The CPUC is very aware that the utilities have gone to the legislature when
the UDCs face elimination of some of the advantages that they have in the
retail market.  We now have a fully-constituted commission (5 members) with
two new democratic appointees with close ties to the governor.  This may
empower the CPUC to take control of issues within their purvue, which
ratemaking and the PX credit, clearly are.  Some members of the legislature
are loathe to get into the CPUC's backyard and "micro-manage".  That being
said, we still face significant risk within the legislature.  We have Steve
Peace, who thinks a wholesale pass-through is adequate for competition, and
Rod Wright, the chair of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee, who
sponsored a similar bill last year and who doesn't believe in retail
competition either.  We have our work cut out for us.

Last year we fought essentially the same battle and defeated the utilities at
attempts to include similar provisions into law for electricity.  We were
able to do so because we had a broad coalition of supporters, including the
environmental community.  Essentially, everyone opposed the utilities'
proposals.

This year we have a different scenario.  SCE is attempting to peel off
environmental groups by rolling in extension of the public purpose funding.
They are also talking to the large consumers, who may perceive that they are
able to get a better deal from the utilities by avoiding the mark-up.

However, it doesn't appear as though the utilities are united in supporting
SCE's language.  We are actively attempting to revive the coalition that was
so effective last year.  We are talking to the environmental groups to try
and keep them in the fold.  This can be done by keeping the two issues of
public purpose funding and competition as separate as possible.

We have been encouraged to settle the PX credit case by the judge.  We are
engaged in the beginning stages of settlement on the PX credit issue with
SDG&E.  We are a long way from settling, however, if we are successful, the
settlement would likely be precedential for both SCE and PG&E.  There is
significant room between the utility proposals for the "retail" portion of
the PX credit and what we are supporting.  We also appear to have the support
of the ratepayer advocates.  We are attempting to get the customer groups to
agree on an outcome, leaving the utilities isolated.  Adoption of our
proposal for the full retail adder is a long-shot.

From a timing perspective, it is possible that we will resolve this issue at
the PUC, before any legislation would become effective.  However, that would
not prevent the legislation from estopping the CPUC decision.

We could use the help of the business units in providing documented
information about the UDCs activities, if its available.  Customer accounts
are very credible, however most customers are unwilling to do that.  We may
also need some assistance from the business units in presenting testimony
when these issues go to hearing before the appropriate committees.

We are working on this issue and will report on any developments.  Thanks.

Jim Badum
03/01/2000 06:22 AM
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Thomas S
Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Janel Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa
Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

So, what do we do to stop this...?

Roger Yang
02/29/2000 04:52 PM
To: Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim
Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES,
Phyllis Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

This is a blatant example of marketing on behalf of SCE.  Of course SCE does
this stuff under the guise of Customer Education.  Do we have anything in
writing provided by SCE that Enron Govt Affairs can provide to the CPUC as
examples of marketing activities, whereby the costs of these types of
activities should be unbundled from the distribution rate.

Of course there is no mark--up what so ever, because the cost of providing
retail commodity is recovered in distribution rates.  Enron Govt Affairs is
currently participating in a proceeding as part of a coalition to determine
what this commodity cost adder should be.

Additionally, the reason there is no premium mark-up for risk management is
because these costs are all pass throughs so there is no price certainty for
the customer.  In fact, there will be price volatility from month-to-month,
if not hour-to-hour.  We do not want to push this last point to much, to the
extent that the customers rally at the CPUC to eliminate the volatility along
with the price signals in favor of interclass and intertemporal subsidies.

Roger

Kelly Cook
02/29/2000 02:02 PM
To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel
Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis
Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

As you would expect, SCE is out telling customers that the proposed
legislative language regarding default electric service is a done deal. The
relevant text in Bruno's message below is as follows:

"SCE believes that the UDC should be the default provider and offer commodity
at a pass through PX price with no adders."

Apparently, SCE is going one step further than a straight pass through of PX
day ahead prices with no adders when in front of industry trade groups. A
potential EES customer has told me that since 1/1/00, John Fiedler, Sr. VP of
Regulatory Policy and Affairs for SCE, has spoken at both CMA and CLECA
meetings and presented with great assurance that in the post transition
period, SCE will purchase both long term and short term energy and pass
through a blended wholesale energy cost with no mark-up to large, end-use
customers.

My interpretation is that such an offering by SCE would put them in direct
competition with ESPs.

Kelly

Bruno Gaillard
02/16/2000 11:56 AM
To: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel
Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis
Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SCE Legeslative Language

SCE has submitted proposed legislative language at the California Legislation
that will define the role of the utility. This language has not yet found a
bill. However, in order to be prepared, Sandi McCubbin has asked me to
forward the proposed  language for analysis.

Bellow is a preliminary analysis of the bill and of our position. Please
expand, edit and complete for legislative action. Please foward to
appropreate people for comments.

Summary:

SCE is defining the basic electric service to include, Distribution,
Metering, Billing, and Customer Service

SCE believes that the UDC should be the default provider and offer commodity
at a pass through PX price with no adders.

Every customer will be charged a non-bypassable charge for basic electric
service (customer charge) and a non-bypassable public goods charge (Energy
efficiency, low income, R&D, and renewable charge). Renewable charge includes
funding for production credits for renewable not under contract with utility,
mandatory state purchase of renewable energy, minimum utility content of
renewable energy, PX green product, Customer credit for Renewables not under
contract with the utility.

DA customers can choose billing and metering services from their ESP and will
receive an avoided cost credit from the UDC for these services.

Analysis:

SCE is trying to preempt through the legislation the role of the utility to
be a Wires and Revenue Cycle Services (RCS) company. Furthermore they see
themselves as being a default provider and offer electric commodity at the
wholesale price, undermining any kind of competition from ESPs.

Their definition of what is included in the renewable credit again undermines
any competition for ESPs in offering these products.

Furthermore, although SCE allows ESPs to offer metering and billing services,
the credit ESPs can receive is based on an avoided cost. The CPUC is
currently presiding over a proceeding, in which it is trying to unbundle RCS.
At a minimum the credits for billing and metering services should be based on
Long Run Marginal Costs.

Position: Actively Oppose

The UDC should be a wires only company. For a UDC, Basic Electric Service
should only include the distribution of the electric power and should be
renamed as Basic Electric Distribution Service. Revenue Cycle Services
(metering, billing,..) should be unbundled from the distribution function.
Costs allocated to these functions should be based, at a minimum, on a Long
Run Marginal Costs or Embedded Costs. The Avoided Costs allocation does not
represent all the costs associated with these services.

The default provider function should be competitively bid out to ESPs and
non-regulated affiliates. The UDCs should be out of the energy service
business including all electric retail functions. The commodity charge for
default customers should include the PX price, all procurement related costs,
and retail marketing related costs.

Currently, the green market is the only viable market in CA for small
consumers.  This proposal would eliminate the competitive market and ensure
market-share dominance for UDC and PX.

SCE's proposal would limit, or seriously restrict, the development of the
market to only UDC-provided green products of PX-provided green products.
This structure creates a subsidy for both the UDCs and the PX for green
products, which would disadvantage competitive offerings for the amount under
contract, providing the UDC with a guaranteed base-load of green-product
demand.  The market available to competitors for green would be only the
demand in excess of the base, for which customers (not ESPs) would receive a
credit from the UDC for the incremental green demand.  Again, because the UDC
would be in the position of doling out credits for green, they would still
control that market.

Attached is a copy of SCE's draft language.


When: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:00 PM-7:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Capital Grille/ 5365 Westheimer/ (713) 623-4600

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Laura Luce has scheduled one last dinner meeting with the Originations Group @  Capital Grille.  Please see the below details:

5:00 PM 	Drinks
6:00 PM	Dinner

Please accept this invite, as it will automatically populate onto your schedule.

Thank you,

Irena


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Mazowita/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

"Mike Gough" <mike.gough@naes.com> on 10/05/2000 10:28:10 AM
Please respond to <mike.gough@naes.com>
To: "Mazowita, Mike" <MIKE.MAZOWITA@ENRON.COM>
cc: "Scarborough, Dan" <dan.scarborough@naes.com>, "Ward, Chuck"
<Charles.Ward@enron.com>

Subject: Tenaska IV outage update

We are finally beginning to put closure on our outage. It has been
frustrating to say the least. We are currently projecting a late Friday or
early Saturday morning startup barring any unseen problems.

MG


Paula,

Thanks. 6:15 works for me. What is dress code at Sullivan's?

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corey, Paula
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 7:33 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Round Table

you bet - i will pick you up friday morning . Is 6:15 ok?


Do you know if you are going to make it yet?


<<5-14-01.pdf>>

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - 5-14-01.pdf


We did deliver 30,000 per day to Mobil for Midcon for the month of May.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffin, Rebecca
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Mobil Beaumont - May 2001

Daren,

I want to confirm the May MidCon volumes for Mobil - I think it is 30,000 mmbtu/day?

Please let me know if I should ask someone else...

Thanks,
Rebecca


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000 11:00
AM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 10:53 AM
To: carl.stendebach@abbpge.com, denis.peranic@chkra.mail.abb.com,
coaustin@wt.net, ausco@cnrf.nola.navy.mil, austin@cnsrf.navy.mil,
blarson@genphysics.com, bbarlow7@aol.com, john.d.sample@lmco.com,
sample@idcomm.com, chris.basham@bus.utexas.edu, dan_m_corpman@raytheon.com,
dsmith81@juno.com, blues21@juno.com, john_e_jackson@dell.com,
jjackson1@austin.rr.com, john_stratemeier@bmc.com, strat@ghg.net,
shaloney@aol.com, mike_d_carathers@raytheon.com, mikec1234@aol.com,
rnelson@jellybelly.com, cdrtom@aol.com, rew@aklw.com, lonpjs@dames.com,
guy_newnham@urscorp.com, psc1957@aol.com, quik_mike@hotmail.com,
C01Michael.Laidlaw@usafa.af.mil, sem5615@aol.com, crhoff@aol.com,
rahns@prodigy.net, dgreene@busey.com, marysia@mail.utexas.edu,
FrankO@geapcs.com, psc1957@aol.com, bob.joyce@kvaerner.com, tcmcgill@aol.com,
gbrown@ne.com, bwalden@ipa.net, dowgriff@gapac.com, JWilson55@aol.com,
blubird66@aol.com, shaloney@aol.com, hudgins@lava.net,
JaworowskiRO@nnsy.navy.mil, ronbud@mciworld.com,
kaufman-global@houston.rr.com, jimf@spawar.navy.mil, jasmith@spawar.navy.mil,
mvwohlsc@ix.netcom.com, melissa@toshibatic.com, Jane
Furman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pat
Esslinger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harvey
Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric
Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carla
Galvan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gayla E
Seiter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy
Hodges/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Darby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Havlik/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, curranac@hotmail.com, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, hscheller@canfibreny.com,
rhowell@bechtel.com, Kathleen A Cook/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marilyn Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, J Douglas
McNeilly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, mccurran44@hotmail.com,
hschell@banet.net, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, kathryn.laidlaw@duke.edu,
kal7@duke.edu, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, GAluce@aol.com
cc:

Subject: Warm Fuzzies from B.W.

these are neat.
regards.  scott.

FIVE GREAT LESSONS:

1 -   Most Important Lesson - During my second month of nursing school, our
professor gave us a pop quiz. I was a conscientious student and had breezed
through the questions,until I read the last one: "What is the first name of
the woman who cleans the school?" Surely this was some kind of joke. I had
seen the cleaning woman several times.  She was tall, dark-haired and in her
50s, but how would I know her name?  I handed in my paper, leaving the last
question blank. Just before class ended, one student asked if the last
question would count toward our quiz grade. "Absolutely," said the professor.
"In your careers, you will meet many people. All are significant. They
deserve your attention and care, even if all you do is smile and say
'hello'." "I've never forgotten that lesson.  I also learned her name was
Dorothy.

2 - Second Important Lesson - Pickup in the Rain. One night, at 11:30 PM, an
older African American woman was standing on the side of an Alabama highway
trying to endure a lashing rain storm. Her car had broken down and she
desperately needed a ride. Soaking wet, she decided to flag down the next
car.  A young white man stopped to help her, generally unheard of in those
conflict-filled 1960s. The man took her to safety, helped her get assistance
and put her into a taxi cab. She seemed to be in a big hurry, but wrote down
his address and thanked him. Seven days went by and a knock came on the man's
door. To his surprise, a giant console color TV was delivered to his home. A
special note was attached. It read: "Thank you so much for assisting me on
the highway the other night. The rain drenched not only my
clothes, but also my spirits. Then you came along. Because of you, I was able
to make it to my dying husband's bedside just before he passed away.  God
bless you for helping me and unselfishly serving others." Sincerely, Mrs. Nat
King  Cole.

3 - Third Important Lesson - Always remember those who serve. In the days
when an ice cream sundae cost much less, a 10 year old boy entered a hotel
coffee shop and sat at a table.  A waitress put a glass of water in front of
him.
"How much is an ice cream sundae?" he asked. "Fifty cents," replied the
waitress. The little boy pulled his hand out of his pocket and studied the
coins in it. "Well, how much is a plain dish of ice cream?" he inquired. By
now more people were waiting for a table and the waitress was growing
impatient. "Thirty-five cents," she brusquely replied." The little boy again
counted his coins.  "I'll have the plain ice cream," he said.  The waitress
brought the ice cream, put the bill on the table and walked away. The boy
finished the ice cream, paid the cashier and left. When the waitress came
back, she began to cry as she wiped down the table. There, placed neatly
beside the empty dish, were two nickels and five pennies - You see, he
couldn't have the sundae, because he had to have enough left to leave her a
tip.

4 -  Fourth Important Lesson - The Obstacle in Our Path. In ancient times, a
King had a boulder placed on a roadway. then he hid himself and watched to
see if anyone would remove the huge rock. Some of the king's wealthiest
merchants and courtiers came by and simply walked around it.  Many loudly
blamed the king for not keeping the roads clear, but none did anything about
getting the stone out of the way. Then a peasant came along carrying a load
of vegetables. Upon
approaching the boulder, the peasant laid down his burden and tried to move
the stone to the side of the road. After much pushing and straining, he
finally succeeded.  After the peasant picked up his load of vegetables, he
noticed a purse lying in the road where the boulder had been. The purse
contained many gold coins and a note from the king  indicating that the gold
was for the person who removed the boulder from the roadway. The peasant
learned what many of us never understand. Every obstacle presents an
opportunity to improve our condition.

5 - Fifth Important Lesson - Giving When it Counts. Many years ago, when I
worked as a volunteer at a hospital, I got to know a little girl named Liz
who was suffering from a rare and serious disease. Her only chance of
recovery appeared to be a blood transfusion from her 5-year old brother, who
had miraculously survived the same disease and had developed the antibodies
needed to combat the illness. The doctor explained the situation to her
little brother, and asked the little boy if he would be willing to give his
blood to his sister. I saw him hesitate for only a moment before taking a
deep breath and saying, "Yes, I'll do it if it will save her." As the
transfusion progressed, he lay in bed next to his sister and smiled, as we
all did, seeing the color returning to her cheeks. Then his face grew pale
and his smile  faded. He looked up at the doctor and asked with a trembling
voice, "Will I start to die right away?" Being young, the little boy had
misunderstood the doctor; he thought he was going to have to give his sister
all of his blood in order to save her. You see, after all, understanding and
attitude, are everything.


Susan:  This may look confusing!  It contains all of our "choices" for
preparing the documents.  See Part 2 (Tax Reps) and the end of the document
which has our "choices" of tax forms.

I thought it might be helpful to be very basic about withholding issues,
etc., why we need the tax reps, and what questions we could ask upfront about
a party that would help us select an appropriate tax module.  We tend to not
"think" and expect a party "fill in the blank" when we are preparing draft
documents.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Ahh hah,  I may be able to run up there and view this thing-----any idea on a starting price???
Joe, you have proved your proficiency with scanning in pics of late,  how 'bout sending over that trailer pic.
E, do you have a receiver ball for a draw-tite? ...just in case.  Does anyone have spare room in their attic to store this trailer??

----- Original Message -----
From: Parks, Joe
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com
Subject: RE: trailer

Erik you need to learn how to spell tomorrow. There is no "a". I too am challenge when it comes to spelling. We can overcome these challenges one word at a time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:10 PM
To: knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe
Subject: Re: trailer

chad, joe has more info on this. But, as i understand it, Kim had info
regarding police siezed goods which happen to include this here trailer,
which has been described as 6x10 and in pretty good condition. apparently
someone is going to have access to a picture of it sometime today.

then there will be this auction thing tomarrow described below. Perhaps it
is an opportunity to get us a fire sale deal on a trailer for our cart. e.

>From: "chad knipe" <knipe3@msn.com>
>To: "EriK Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Joe Parks" <joe.parks@enron.com>
>Subject: Re: trailer
>Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:12:05 -0600
>
>What the hell are you talking about???????  Is there some sort of auction
>going on I don't know about?????????
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Erik Wollam
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:35 AM
>To: Joe.Parks@ENRON.com; knipe3@msn.com
>Subject: trailer
>
>how in the hell are we supposed to take advantage of this? Chad, you got
>something going on tomarrow in Humble? Joe? I have depos in my office. No
>can do.
>
>
> >From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
> >To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: RE: FW:
> >Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:13:54 -0600
> >
> >actually its tomorrow, Mar 5, 310 Fisher Rd. Humble Texas ( key map 335y)
> >Time previews begin at 9am, sales begin 10am, all sales must be made in
> >cash
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:06 AM
> >To: Parks, Joe
> >Subject: Re: FW:
> >
> >
> >excellent. when and were do we bid?
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
> > >To: "Brian Constantine (E-mail)" <brianc@saltgrass.com>,   "Chad Knipe
> > >(E-mail 2)" <knipe3@msn.com>,   "Erik Wollam (E-mail)"
> > ><erwollam@hotmail.com>
> > >Subject: FW:
> > >Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:37:03 -0600
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Parks, Kim [mailto:PARKS_KIM@da.co.harris.tx.us]
> > >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:26 AM
> > >To: Parks, Joe
> > >Subject:
> > >
> > >
> > >The trailer is in pretty good condition per the officer and he thinks
>the
> > >tires were okay.  It is 6' x 10'.  Linda is still going to take a
>picture
> > >of
> > >it today at noon and I will bring it home tonight.
> > >
> > >
> > >**********************************************************************
> > >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>affiliate
> > >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
>of
> > >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> >by
> > >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
>(or
> > >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> > >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> >delete
> > >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> >not
> > >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>evidence
> >a
> > >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>be
> > >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>otherwise.
> > >Thank you.
> > >**********************************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> >http://www.hotmail.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


thanks for the info.
PL


Ann here is the Midcoast Amendment.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Osire, Ann
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Dickson, Stacy E.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Osire, Ann
Subject:	GISB Amendment - Midcoast Marketing, Inc.

      Debra,

James Lee at Midcoast Marketing agreed to amending the GISB Base Contract to make Enron the confirming party.  The customer has not been sending us confirmations in a timely manner.  Details are as follows:

Contract #:  96029313
Contact:  James Lee
e-mail: jlee@midcoastenergy.com
Phone #: (713) 821-2079
Fax #: (713) 653-6746

I will be more than glad to send him the amendment, if you can forward it to me.

Thanks,
Ann


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
07:58 AM ---------------------------

Ashley Baxter@ENRON on 10/12/2000 07:19:55 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu Tutos/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Denise Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

We have been able to secure rooms at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley.  Please
note the confirmation numbers listed below.  Thanks!

Claremont Resort and Spa - Berkeley
41 Tunnel Road
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-843-3000

FROM OAKLAND AIRPORT: Go straight out of the airport on Airport Blvd. Turn
right on Hegenberger Road. From Hegenberger
follow signs for 880 North. Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for Hwy 24
to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning
left at the bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

FROM SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT: Follow signs for Hwy 101 North to San Francisco,
take Hwy 80 East to the Bay Bridge to Oakland.
Cross Bay Bridge on Hwy 80, follow to 580 East, and exit onto HWY 24 to
Berkeley/Walnut Creek.  Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for
Hwy 24 to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning left at the
bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
07:15 PM ---------------------------

Lara Marie Berry
10/10/2000 04:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu
Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Denise
Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Simone Lewis/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

Cal Berkeley
General Presentation
Monday, October 16th

This note is to confirm that you are scheduled to attend the Cal Berkeley
General Presentation on Monday October 16th.  This e-mail should contain any
information that you need to know pertaining to your trip.  Please print out
a hard copy and bring with you in case of emergency.  If you have any
questions, there is a list of contacts listed below.

Once again, thank you for offering to help with technology recruiting at Cal
Berkeley.  See you on campus!

Lara

The General Presentation will be held:

Monday, October 16th
The Faculty Club
Seaborg Room - 2nd Floor
7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
**Please plan on arriving at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.

The General Presentation is designed to educate the students on Enron and the
Global Technology Track.  Following the presentation we will invite the
students to ask questions about Enron and the Global Technology Track.
Please plan to arrive at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.  It is
business casual attire.

FLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS:

You are responsible for scheduling your own flight arrangements with your
preferred airline provider.  Please schedule your flight to arrive to the San
Francisco airport on Monday, October 16th.   Please remember that there can
be significant traffic over the Bay Bridge and to get into town at least an
hour prior to the event.  Please make all flight arrangements through the
Travel Agency in the Park so that we are able to take advantage of discount
fares.  If you do not have a representative that you currently use at the
Travel Agency in the Park - feel free to contact Liz Mendiola at 713-860-1140.

RENTAL CAR ARRANGEMENTS:

Once again, you are responsible for scheduling your own rental car
arrangements with your preferred provider.  Your Travel Agency in the Park
representative should be able to assist you with rental car reservations.

HOTEL ARRANGEMENTS:

Hotel reservations are currently being made by our representative at the
Travel Agency in the Park.

As soon as we have confirmation numbers, I will let you know.

San Francisco Airport to The Faculty Club

Take 101 Northbound
Exit to San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge
Exit to 1-80 East
Exit on University Ave.
East on University Avenue for 1.5 miles to Oxford St.
Right on Oxford St., left on Durant Ave., left on Piedmont
You will see parking on the right side

Once again, thank you so much for helping with the General Presentation.
Below are some last minute tips to keep in mind:

Please remember to dress business casual.
Please remember to bring some business cards for students.
I have attached a pdf version of the Global Technology Track  brochure.
Please forward all expense receipts to Grace Garcia.  She will handle any
expenses incurred for this recruiting trip including: flight costs, hotel,
car, food, valet, etc.  However, you must turn in some sort of receipt - so
be sure and save them!

Ashley Baxter   work:  713-853-3589
    cell:  281-793-0567

Lara Berry   work:  713-345-8320
    cell:  713-857-1034

Grace Garcia   work:  713-853-7252

Simone Lewis   work:  713-853-1645


juan.hernandez@enron.com   # 713-853-0383


FYI

Don
---------------------- Forwarded by Donald W Herrick/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
11:19 AM ---------------------------
Kristi Demaiolo @ ENRON   01/26/2001 10:57 AM

To: Donald W Herrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CL Transaction on DealBench

Some positive feedback so far.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kristi Demaiolo/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001
10:55 AM ---------------------------

"Elkouby, Jean-Maurice" <Jean-Maurice.Elkouby@creditlyonnais.co.uk> on
01/26/2001 10:13:53 AM
To: "'Kristi.Demaiolo@enron.com'" <Kristi.Demaiolo@enron.com>
cc: "Perry, Stuart" <Stuart.Perry@creditlyonnais.co.uk>

Subject: RE: Transaction on DealBench

Wow !! Big brother is watching you... Thanks for your message. Actually, we
are quite impressed by how smooth the whole process is. But I think that my
colleague is talking to you at the moment... So far so good. We will see how
banks respond to the system. Many thanks indeed. With kind regards, JM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kristi.Demaiolo@enron.com [mailto:Kristi.Demaiolo@enron.com]
Sent: 26 January 2001 16:08
To: jean-maurice.elkouby@creditlyonnais.co.uk
Subject: Transaction on DealBench

Hi Jean-Maurice,

I just wanted to touch base with you to see how your DealBench experience
is going.  I realize you may have some colleagues that are working with you
that may not have been in our demo in November.  I'm happy to spend some
time with them on the phone walking through the functionality within the
site.  Please feel free to call me at 713-345-3726.

I look forward to hearing from you to know how things are going.

Kind Regards,
Kristi DeMaiolo

*************************************************************************
The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it
by anyone else is unauthorized. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Credit Lyonnais or any of its affiliates. The information contained herein
is recorded for business purposes and use of services is monitored to
protect both the company and its individual users. If you are not the
intended recipient please contact postmaster@creditlyonnais.co.uk
*************************************************************************


Larry,
Thanks for your time earlier today. I have attached the pipeline list - would appreciate your guidance on the liquidity, volatility and how we can best hedge our gas positions for these pipelines.
Regards,
Vivek


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:09 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/27/99 02:05 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil
Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Melissa
Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Frank Kronz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - January 2000 Tn Zn 6 volumes

Here are the January daily volumes for each of the gates.    I know you wanted
an exact volume for 1/1 but I will not have that for all Tennessee Zn 6
markets
until Thursday as Boston Gas and S. Ct. Algorithms will be available then.   I
have estimates in on those gates.  We will need a range from 2700 dth to 3600
dth per day.   This large swing is normal for these types of markets due to
weekends, weather, and customer situations.


Since the time frame is short, I wanted to give you an outline to mark
up/correct.

Here's how I understand the deal:

People's has the Manlove gas storage facility.  We have presented to People's
a nonphysical method to monetize it, similar to what was done with Bammel.
Since this is a regulated asset, regulatory approval will be required, and
the consumers will receive part of the benefit of the monetization.  The
essence of our deal is that Enron will receive 50% of the net earnings, up to
$25mm, as our fee.  In consideration for this fee, Enron takes the financial,
legal, accounting and engineering lead. Peoples and Enron will work together
on the regulatory strategy formulation and implementation.

We want to present a draft MOU to Peoples this week.  The basic goals are:

Define scope of the agreement
Define our lead role in the 4 stated areas
Create exclusivity for Enron
Define financial arrangements (cost/profit)
Get an acknowledgement that what was presented to them was proprietary, and
covered by our confidentiality agreement.
Define term (5 years)

Each party bears their own internal costs, and third party costs are split
50/50, with prior approval.  In that regard an immediate concern is getting
the engineering work kicked off.

We want the agreement broad enough to cover physical withdrawals.  We do not
want it specific to this field, since we want the benefit of the use of our
methodology.

Please correct/supplement, etc.

Thanks,

Kay


Mark

I know I promised you a weekly trading update.  I got a little distracted
this week.  I will get it done.

John


Mich, lets get Kelly and Dawn on phone. I thought we could assign without ee's needed to do anything further?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 12:21 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:	FW: Canadian legal entity

Are you working on the new Contracts?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 12:20 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Keohane, Peter; Hedstrom, Peggy
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Milnthorp, Rob; Beck, Sally; Zufferli, John
Subject:	Canadian legal entity

The name for the Canadian entity which will enter into both Master Agreements and individual commodity transactions is: "UBS Warburg Energy (Canada) Ltd.", as confirmed by Lou Eber: UBS Chief Legal Counsel.

I am working on chasing down the parental guarantee issue.

Dave


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042111.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS


"Kapoor, Arrun" <kapoor@eurasiagroup.net> on 04/05/2001 12:01:44 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: former Turkish Prime Minister Tansu Ciller in Eurasia Group Round
table, "Turkey's Political Stability"

Please find attached an invitation to our upcoming roundtable, "Turkey's
Political Stability," with former Turkish Prime Minister, Tansu Ciller.  The
program will be held on Friday, May 4th in the New York offices of Eurasia
Group.

Please email info@eurasiagroup.net or call Jonathan Whitmore at 212.213.3112
with any questions.  To register for the roundtable please fax the
registration form to 212.213.3075.

To stop receiving invitations for future Eurasia Group events, please reply
to this message and type "REMOVE" in the subject header.

****************************************************

Eurasia Group is pleased to announce a breakfast roundtable in the next in
our Eurasia Forum series:

TURKEY'S POLITICAL STABILITY with TANSU CILLER, FORMER TURKISH PRIME
MINISTER

Discussant: TBD

Chair: Ian Bremmer, President, Eurasia Group

DATE: Friday, 4 May 2001
TIME: 8:30am - 10:00am
PLACE: Eurasia Group Executive Offices
461 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor (enter on 40th Street)
New York, NY  10017

A public row between the Turkish president and prime minister in
mid-February sparked market turmoil that resulted in an overnight 30%
devaluation in the lira and a crash of the IMF-backed stabilization program.
These events led to the resignations of the central bank governor and
treasury undersecretary and have tested the staying power of the country's
three-party government coalition.  In response to this instability, the
Turkish government appointed former World Bank Vice President, Kemal Dervis,
as the new Minister of Economics in hopes of resuscitating the country's
fledgling economy.

Ciller was elected Prime Minister in June 1993; her True Path party led
several coalition governments until 1996.  After losing her seat in 1996,
her party formed a coalition with the center-right Motherland Party which
was followed by an alliance with the conservative far-right Welfare Party.
The later move resulted in heightened tension between True Path and the
military and business establishment.  In the current financial turmoil, Ms.
Ciller has attempted to reposition herself as a force that will regain the
nation's financial and political stability.

TURKEY'S POLITICAL STABILITY
4 MAY 2001    ?   NEW YORK

NAME: ____________________________________

TITLE: ____________________________________

COMPANY:____________________________________

ADDRESS:____________________________________

____________________________________

E-MAIL:____________________________________

PHONE:____________________________________

FAX:____________________________________

PLEASE CHARGE MY AMEX/VISA/MASTERCARD:  $150

CARD #: ____________________________________

EXPIRATION:______________

SIGNATURE: ____________________________________

[ ] MY CHECK FOR $150 IS ENCLOSED
[Please make checks payable to Eurasia Group, 461 5th Ave., 14th Floor, New
York, NY  10017]

To ensure proper registration or to receive a full refund please send notice
by Wednesday, May 2nd via fax to 212.213.3075 or via e-mail to
info@eurasiagroup.net.

This event is an informal business discussion with U.S. and foreign policy
makers, press, and senior level executives from companies active or
interested in Turkey.  The formal presentation will be on-the-record; the
Q&A will be off.  If you have any questions or need further information
please contact Jonathan Whitmore or Arrun Kapoor of Eurasia Group at tel.
212.213.3112; please RSVP via fax to 212.213.3075 or e-mail to
info@eurasiagroup.net.  Participation fee: $150; complimentary for Eurasia
Group members and press.

***************************************
Arrun Kapoor
Director, Programming
Eurasia Group
461 Fifth Avenue, Floor 14
New York, New York  10017
t: 212.213.3112
f: 212.213.3075
www.eurasiagroup.net

 - Invite NY.pdf


Kam:  I am asking that we spend 30 minutes going over the questions that I sent out Friday.  I kept the same time since we had a room for that time slot but I know you guys have been really busy with the move so let me know if there is another time that would be better for you.

Monica Clay
x57227


Stan's day just opened up for this Thursday the 4th, or we could do 2:30 to 5:00PM on Monday, October 29, or 2:30 to 5:00PM on Tuesday, October 30.   Otherwise, that's it.   Please advise asap.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Stark, Cindy
Subject:	FW: Azurix 2002 Plan Review

What else can we do?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Angela Ramirez/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX@ENRON   On Behalf Of Angela Ramirez@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Anderson, Michael
Cc:	Garrison, John L; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Re: Azurix 2002 Plan Review

John is on vacation from Thursday, October 18th and will return on Wednesday, October 24th.

Angela

	Michael Anderson 10/02/01 03:10 PM 	  To: Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON  cc: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, John L Garrison/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Angela Ramirez/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX  Subject: Re: Azurix 2002 Plan Review << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

This will work for me - I will check with John Garrison

	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate 10/02/01 10:18 AM 	   To: Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX  cc: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Azurix 2002 Plan Review

Stan is available October 18 from 1:00-3:00 in his office.  Will this work?


As you know, exceeding this limit would require contacting the Enron Board of
Directors.  Jeff Skilling is keenly interested in this measurement.  In
conversations with Ted Murphy today, Jeff has asked that he receive a daily
report from Ted on component V@R.  Ted called me about 3:00 pm today (Houston
time) to let me know about this requirement.  Obviously, we want to meet
Skilling's request with information that is as timely, accurate and  complete
as possible.  Therefore, we were concerned about feeds from London that over
the past several weeks have caused one London commodity or another to be
excluded from the first run of component V@R.  (Mike:  I assume that you are
very familiar with these feed problems from your representative that you send
to the daily 8:30 meeting.)

I pulled Steve Stock out of a pre-PRC meeting to meet with Ted, Shona, Ramesh
and me at 4:00 today.  Realizing that the time was very late in London, we
tried to reach you both at home numbers and by cell phone to include you in
the meeting.  Since we could not do so, we continued without you given that
Skilling will want to see this report daily starting tomorrow.

Here is the key fact to know:  It takes 3 hours to run the component V@R
calculations, once all inputs have been received and processed.  The
Component V@R calculations are kicked off at 6:30 am Houston time, producing
an approximate completion time of 9:30 am Houston time.   With this
timeframe, our goal would be to have the component V@R report to Jeff by
approximately 10:00 am Houston time.

Given current calculation times, in order to consistently calc component V@R
including all London feeds, London books (UK power, UK gas and Nordic power)
will have to be completed, calculated and officialized by 4:00 am Houston
time (10:00 am London time).  If this time frame is not met, then component
V@R reports for Jeff will be incomplete.  We had hoped to discuss this with
you today so that you could work with your operations staff, systems support
and traders to insure that you could consistently meet a 10:00 am London
requirement for officialized books.

The other immediate action to take is to ask Mike to work with David Hardy on
what we understand to be an almost-completed task of including UK spread
options in V@R calculations using the V@R engine.  Those V@R calculations
that are done through Excel calculations are not captured and included in the
component V@R calculations.  While there are other commodities that will
currently be excluded from component V@R reports, they are deemed to be less
material than the UK spread options.  Ramesh felt that it is only a matter of
days before this is completed.  Mike, we would like for you to stay on top of
this from an operations perspective to insure that this happens.

I should note that the firm 10:00 am deadline for officializing books in the
UK will only result in producing a report for Jeff by 10:00 am Houston time.
We don't know what Jeff's expectation will be regarding timing.  It is
probably safe to say that we should be actively looking at process and
systems changes that could result in the ability to deliver such a report
earlier in the morning.

Mike, I will call you during my morning commute on Thursday to see whether or
not you have any questions or if there are concerns about consistently
meeting the 10:00 am deadline in London.


Mike, here are two draft sets of talking points covering Stan's initial phone
call with Ted Davis to discuss whether a settlement meeting would be useful
and the subsequent settlement meeting itself.  Please give me any comments
you have and I'll send to Stan or have available to hand to him at our
meeting, which I understand is scheduled for 9 am on Tuesday.  I'll  be
calling in from Arizona.  Note there is at least one issue we ought to think
about a bit more--whether to have Stan imply there may be other goodies
available other than the Hobbs Line.  I'm inclined to avoid implying that,
but to have Stan primed to pull out additional goodies if necessary.

I have not yet completed a bullet point outline of the settlement proposal
for Stan to send to Davis after Stan and he meet.  As things currently stand
it would basically be identical to the second sheet of talking points.   I
would prefer to finalize that document after we meet with Stan, both to
minimize the paper in front of him at the Tuesday meeting and to allow the
Davis outline to be tailored to reflect the strategy we arrive at with Stan
(I think I'm safe in assuming we will tinker with the strategy a bit on
Tuesday morning).  If we do modify the strategy, I'll also modify the talking
points.

Britt and Barrett, I wanted you to know the timetable in part because, if
Stan decides to go forward,  we need to send Barrett's suggested letter to
Jad verifying continued application of the settlement privilege to Stan and
Ted's discussions.   I intend to call you after the Stan meeting to advise.
Just in case you don't hear from me by late morning Tuesday, please give Mike
a call to confirm whether to send the letter.  I may have fallen into the
Grand Canyon or been bitten by a hila monster.


Martha Skeeters
RR1 Box 117B-4
Norman, OK 73072
skeeters@telepath.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Martha Skeeters


Hi.  My brother just called.  would you mind if I gave him the Sunday Cubs
tickets.  If you've already secured people for them, not big deal, but I
think his kids would get a big kick out of it.  They're both big ball
players.


Boy, I'd like to know where I'm going to be for the next 2 days too!

	Tom Moran
	06/09/2000 09:19 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 6/8/00

Tana,

Can you please give us a detailed breakdown of where you'll be every minute
of the 2 days you will be out of the office.
Additionally, we need to know who the backups to your backup will be.

tm  :)

From: Tana Jones on 06/09/2000 09:16 AM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 6/8/00

You are a god and your name will be revered through all time!!!

	Tom Moran
	06/09/2000 09:14 AM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities,
Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 6/8/00

There are no EOL responses for 6/8/00.

Regards
tm


Tana/Kelly/Karen:

The product long descriptions below will fall under two new product types:
   CAN Recycled OCC Phy
   CAN Recycled ONP Phy

 Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product
types from the following:

 US Recycled OCC Phy
 US Recycled ONP Phy

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, May 30.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lozano, Melba
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Sever, Stephanie
Cc: Nelson, Gary; Walker, Chris
Subject: FW: Approval needed for 2 product types (CAN Recycled OCC and ONP
Phy)

Stephanie:

For CAN Recycled Occ phy  they want to copy US Recycled OCC Phy (2008)
For CAN Recycled ONP phy they want to copy US Recycled ONP Phy (2009)
For CAN Newsprint Phy they want to copy US Newsprint Phy (2006)

If you have any questions the best person to ask is either Chris or Gary
regarding these products.

Thanks,
Melba Lozano
713-345-8986
713-646-8511 Fax
713-698-4847 Pager

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walker, Chris
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Taylor, Mark; Collins,
Harry; Moran, Tom; Mao, Shari; Hoang, Charlie
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi,
Kelly; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Cass, Robert B.;
Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba; Alatorre, Carlos
Subject: Approval needed for 2 product types (CAN Recycled OCC and ONP Phy)

Please approve the following 2 product types in Data Manager after 11:00
A.M.  Attached are the GTC and long descriptions.

CAN Recycled OCC Phy
CAN Recycled ONP Phy

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	John-1/2 day Vaction

Date:		4/26/2001
Time:		5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Jim,

As requested, Enron North America Corp. is confirming that Sacramento Municipal Utility District has acquired Parcel 8887.0 and a portion of Parcel 8889.0 through the capacity release process.  Both of SMUD's bids are not contingent on satisfying any conditions, therefore, the capacity described below should be awarded effective February 1, 2002.

Parcel 8887.0:

	10,000 Dth/day 		Kingsgate to Malin	02/01/02 through 10/31/05	100% of Max Tariff Rate	(approx $0.298595 per Dth)

Parcel 8889.0:

	10,000 Dth/day 		Kingsgate to Malin	02/01/02 through 10/31/08	100% of Max Tariff Rate	(approx $0.471975 per Dth)

Unfortunately, no one bid on the remaining 42,500 Dth/day of capacity in Parcel 8889.0, or the 10,099 Dth/day of capacity in Parcel 8885.0 which terminates on 10/31/02.

Call me if you need anything else,

Ruth Concannon
ruth.concannon@enron.com
713 - 853 - 1667


I just talked to Bob, and I don't know if he's responded yet, but I thought
I'd fill you in anyway. He's been talking to his contact at Constellation
about changing these deals over, but hasn't received a concrete answer yet.
I've reminded him and he said he WILL talk to the guy and resolve it today.
I'll keep on it, and let you know when these deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/29/2001 11:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I hate to bug you with this.  Whenever you can spare a second would
you ask Bob about this?  I am afraid it is going to slip through the cracks.

Thanks for your help!
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hi Bob, I was wondering if you have contacted Constellation about the 6
trades that are in the system with the Cal Px as the index price.  All of
these trades start flowing in July of this year.

The deal numbers are as follows:

453152.01
453175.01
453294.01
462109.01
471888.01
471889.01

Let me know if Constellation agrees to change these deals to the Dow Jones so
I can send a letter for them to sign.

Thanks,
Melissa


Steve:

I talked with Ben this afternoon and understand that we are ready to proceed
with Panda Energy in a transaction involving the sale of member interests in
special purpose entities associated with the four(4) LV units.  I have left a
message with Panda letting them know that we are prepared to proceed and will
begin preparing a set of draft definitive agreements for their review.  I
have asked Panda to confirm that they are ready to receive these documents
and proceed.  I understand that you are in Houston.  Please call/see me
tomorrow morning so that we can discuss this transaction.

Kay:  We need to prepare a draft set of definitive agreements for this
transaction.  Can Carolyn complete this while you are in New York?  Also,
what is the status of the LM Breakout contract for the 4 LV units.  Let me
know.

Kathleen:  We need to confirm tomorrow morning that we have received executed
CA's from Panda.  I have the CA execution originals for the four Panda
entities at my desk for Ben's signature.  These need to be received prior to
sending Panda the definitive agreements.  We will fax signature pages to Ben
tomorrow.

Chris:  See me tomorrow morning to discuss the technical spec's that were
sent to Panda

I will be at my desk by 8 am tomorrow morning.

Thanks,
Fred
x35406


I don't know anything about Shelby, but I take it that you don't think it
impacts Haywood at this late date.

Kay


I'll be calling in from out of the office, as will Sheila.


All

I have received a few notes about this since this one but I will try to
respond to all questions here. Please see below responses in RED:

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           08/03/2000 17:54

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Transitional Assignments

Please note this is confidential at this point!

To document what we discussed by phone, I met with Sally Beck and Brent Price
today.  Fernley Dyson has a vacancy that he is attempting to fill, but it may
be 3 to 6 months before the position is up and running.  To accomplish the
need in the meantime, Sally and Brent have agreed to share the duties as
follows:

Brent - April 1 to June 15
Sally - June 16 to August 15

They are traveling to the UK the week of 3/20 and would like to schedule some
time with you on either Monday afternoon or Wednesday.  Please let us know
what is good for you.
I have free time on the morning of the 20th. I will book out a room from
11-12am in HR. Please let me know if this is a problem.

Issues:

Housing - They will each be bringing their families with them (Brent - spouse
and 2 small children - the baby will need a crib; Sally - husband and 3
children - ages 15, 11 and 2).  I understand that the houses which have been
vacated due to returning expats have all been filled, so can you have someone
arrange for corporate housing that will accommodate them? I think the best
way to go here is for us to use serviced apartments as it will be very
difficult to find a lease for such a short period for this type of
accommodation. My assistant, Lisa, has put a call in to a service who can
help us find serviced accommodation in South Kensington/Chelsea area or in
Dolphin Square where we have people now who are very satisfied. Is there a
reason you are partial to South Kensington/Chelsea? What if we find
accommodation in another nice area of London within a short commute to the
office? When I have some options, I will let you know, probably on Monday.

Immigration - Due to the fact that they will be traveling back and forth and
have made trips already, I feel it would be best to apply for work permits
versus using the visa waiver.  I have sent them the forms and requested that
Brent complete his and file immediately to increase chances of getting his
sometime shortly after he arrives in the UK.  I have informed him that he
should arrive without his family if the permit has not been received by April
1. Brent's work permit will be submitted today and we may receive if before
April 1st, but it is unlikely. The way it works for this is as follows: Brent
will receive the work permit from us and if he is here, he will have to leave
the UK and enter with the work permit for it to be validated. If his family
are in Houston, they will need to receive entry clearance in the US prior to
arriving in the UK. This takes approx 7 working days and they will require
either Brent's original passport and work permit or a certified copy of each
along with other things such as marriage and birth certificates. If Brent
decides to bring his family with him to London prior to receiving the work
permit, they must say they are coming on a vacation for a short period of
time and have a return ticket to back it up. Once the permit is received, the
family can either travel back to Houston and submit the entry clearance visas
there or they can all travel to Amsterdam where they are currenlty issuing
entry clearance without a problem. There is always a small element of risk in
going to Amsterdam, however, as do not have to issue the stamps there, they
just do it because they are nice! Work permits are arriving approx 4 weeks
from date of submission. We can discuss all of this on the 20th.

Tax - Please confirm whether PAYE will need to be paid for them during the
short term assignment and then reclaimed through a treaty benefit. PAYE is
due after 60 days; however, if Brent and Sally are really only going to be
here for approx 75 days, I am not going to inform the Revenue that they are
here. If this extends beyond the set time, we can look at options but the
only responsiblility that Brent and Sally will have is to ensure they
complete the tax organiser in order for us to get the tax back. Also, as we
would have to apply the treaty here, we need to ensure the salary costs stay
in Houston. Jane, have you discussed this point?

Benefits - I have suggested that they remain on US domestic payroll and
benefits and, if medical claims arise that exceed what they would have spent
in the US, they may claim the excess on the expense report. Agreed.

Per diem - We need to discuss the appropriate amount based on family size.
Jane, please call me to discuss. I have left you a message, thanks

Let me know of any other issues we need to address.  As always, I appreciate
your help.

Jane


Shelley-
	Attached is a file with a page for each month showing cash in's and cash out's with totals for each and detail of each.
These are volumes after bookout.  I pulled this information from TSS Invoicing for each month and sorted it by volume amounts.  The majority\minority categories are based on the numbers of customers that were in either cash in or cash out, rather than on the volume.  If the majority\minority categories are based on volume, then three months change: Oct 00, Nov 00, and April 01.

	Let me know if this is what you needed or if there are other reports I can pull.  I will also send this to Jim Studebaker, maybe he can incorporate it into his spreadsheet of prices.

Galen


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041312.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Tom,

Sorry about the phone tag.  I was calling to determine next steps re: Enron.
The last, I believe, was that you were going to get together with your team
to discuss possibilities.

Hope all is well.

Got anyone down in Texas that can count votes...accurately? :)

Mike


Hi Steve,

I shall call you Friday morning my time.

Vince


9.	MINORITY INTERESTS

	Enron consolidates a limited partnership (the Limited Partnership), for which the consolidated third party's ownership interest is reflected in minority interests on Enron's balance sheet in the amount of $691 million at September 30, 2001.  The Limited Partnership assets include a $690 million note payable from Enron and certain merchant investments, both domestic and international.  Enron anticipates the receipt of $250 million from the sale of one of the Limited Partnership's investments, a local gas distribution company in Brazil, upon the closing of the sale which is pending certain regulatory and other approvals.  Enron may be required to use the net proceeds upon the closing of the sale, or a portion thereof, to repay a portion of the note payable.

	The November 12, 2001 downgrade in Enron's senior unsecured debt rating to BBB- by Standard & Poor's has caused a ratings event related to the Limited Partnership.  This ratings event started a nine business day period during which Enron has the right, until November 26, 2001, to either post an unsecured letter of credit equal to Enron's note payable, repay the note payable with the Limited Partnership investing such proceeds in permitted investments, or to purchase the investors' interest in the Limited Partnership.  To the extent that Enron does not satisfy this requirement by November 26, 2001, the investors have the right to immediately begin to liquidate the Limited Partnership assets.  Additionally, as a result of the rating downgrade, the investors, subject to certain actions, are able to accelerate and assign the note payable.  Consistent with the restructuring plan discussed in Note 2, Enron is currently working with the lenders to develop a mutually acceptable amendment or waiver to the transaction documents in order to avoid an early Enron payment obligation.

	Either as a result of the restructuring plan discussed in Note 2 or to raise cash to repay Enron's obligation discussed above, Enron may sell the Limited Partnership assets for amounts below their carrying values.  The net proceeds from the sale of such assets can be used to repay Enron's obligation.  Accordingly, Enron may be required to record asset writedowns, possibly as early as the fourth quarter of 2001.

	It is not possible to predict whether Enron will be able to favorably complete the actions described above.  In the event that Enron fails to pay any debt obligations when due, including when such obligations may be accelerated, or is unable to refinance or obtain a waiver of its obligation, a series of events would begin which could impact Enron's compliance with the terms of its Revolving Credit Agreements and certain other obligations, including bank debt facilities.

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Mark

Dan Reck is hoping to enter into discussions with Canadian National, who are
insisting upon the inclusion of a non-raid provision in the confidentiality
agreement, the offending clause is attached.

In speaking with Dan, his view is that it is more likely that Canadian
National would want to employ some of our people than us wanting to employ
any but their most senior people.

The period proposed is for one year after the date we have terminated our
discussions. I have asked that Canadian National consider a 6 month period
and they have not yet responded.

In looking at the legal policy on this, I see that the head business person
and you, as the General Counsel, will need to be comfortable with this
provision.
Once you have had the chance to review it I would be grateful if you could
advise as to what we are able to accept and who you believe is the "head
business person" who will also need to sign off on this.

Many thanks.

Marcus


From now on, the ercot load applet/application is located on the file server
(M Drive) rather than running locally from the client PC.
There are 2 ways to run the applet/application

1) As desktop application

Create an Desktop ShortCut which points to the following file

  M:\Fundamental Analysis\Development\Ercot\sercot.jar

     ( Or simply COPY the "Ercot RT Load" shortcut (under M:\Fundamental
Analysis\Development\Ercot\) and PASTE it to your desktop)

2) As browser applets

 http://wnahou-000832/ercot.html

      ( if you never visit the site before,  you need to setup security
certification. call me (x39865) and I can install it for you)

Let me know if anyone have any problems.

Thanks,
--a.w.

	From:  Kayne Coulter @ ECT                           09/19/2000 05:01 PM

To: Alex Wong/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Ercot Load

Rudy Acevedo
Juan Hernandez
Kayne Coulter
Mitch Robinson

These are the names that you asked for.

Thanks
Kayne


I appreciate the message, Tom, and by this email am requesting that my
clients give this some thought.  Either Mike or I will be back in touch with
you shortly.  Thanks again!  DF

Tom Rutherford <comd3@swcp.com> on 11/08/2000 04:52:16 PM
To: "Drew.Fossum@enron.com" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Legislative session

Hope you are doing well. The upcoming legislative session will, at the
least,be considering pipeline safety proposals, and possibly tax
measures. Should we visit about me at least monitoring the session for
Transwestern? Please call..505-265-7129..thanks, tom rutherford


Mark:

I spoke briefly to Steve Pruett this past week regarding the Cypress JOA cash
call issue that you had inquired about.   As I mentioned in my voicemail to
you, I was not aware of the farmout arrangement or JOA with Kelley and had
not been asked to review the farmout agreement or the JOA.  I obtained copies
of the documents and asked Steve to fill me in on how the situation
developed.  Steve was out of the office much of last week; he followed up
Friday with the attached email message.

As Steve mentions in his email, there were extenuating circumstances and
timing issues, but certainly it was a mistake for a rig to be moved and a
well spudded without agreements in place and for documents to be signed
without appropriate review and approval.  I understand that John Thompson and
Steve made the decision to move the rig and spud the well when they had a
term sheet and draft agreement that they anticipated being able to sign in
short order.   Allen Wilhite and I frequently work together to get
documentation finalized and in form for Steve's execution.  From Steve's
reaction when I told him I had not reviewed or initialled the farmout (which
had been initialled by Allen), I believe he had assumed that had been the
case in this situation as well, although he did not try to place
responsibility on Allen.

Steve is one of the best and the brightest I've worked with at Enron.  He is
extremely busy, working very hard to manage the portfolio of existing E & P
assets, as well as working on new deals.  I have worked with Steve enough to
know that he would never have intentionally failed to follow our procedures.
I think this incident was a mistake that will not be repeated.  I will remind
the ECR group at Monday's staff meeting that review by the legal department
is required before any agreements are signed.

Where do we go from here?  Would you like for me to arrange a meeting with
Steve?  Please let me know if there is anything further you would like for me
to do.

Steve raises the issue of staffing in his email.  In light of the level of
activity for new ECR deals, time that is required in assisting Global Finance
with Condor and a funding vehicle for the VPPs, and the increased legal time
required as Bonne Terre, Cypress, and Vastar are no longer managed by third
parties, being able to provide quality and timely legal advice is
increasingly difficult, and staffing is an issue that I hope can be addressed
soon.

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:04 PM -----

	Steve Pruett@ENRON
	11/09/2000 07:18 PM

		 To: teresa.g.bushman@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kelly Farmout Agreement - Cypress Venture

Teresa:

Thank you for approaching me directly about the issue of my failure to obtain
legal review of the subject farmout agreement in Enron Energy Capital
Resources' (ECR) Cypress Venture.  The circumstances of the event follow to
the best of my knowledge, without confirming with Allen Wilhite who is
presently inaccessible:

Rozel Energy, led by Bill Rogers, identified a high potential / relatively
low risk prospect in late August on acreage held by Kelley Oil & Gas (sub of
Contour Energy).  He commissioned a lease check and found that Kelley
controlled 90%+ of the acreage, but it was set to expire on Sept. 28, 2000.

Rozel, after reviewing the prospect with ECR technical personnel and
receiving approval to do so, sought to acquire top leases over the prospect
only to find that others had already top-leased a significant portion of the
prospect.  Had the Kelley lease expired, these parties would have controlled
and drilled the prospect.

Rozel, with the help of Allen Wilhite, approached Kelley for a farmout.
Kelley asked to be presented with a prospect review under the concept that
Kelley would be willing to farmout approximately 50% of its interest, or
farmout all of its interest retaining an ORRI convertible to a WI APO or
higher ORRI at its option.

Kelley elected to participate for 50% of its interest in the well before the
farmout agreement was drafted.  Kelley agreed to general terms in a brief
letter agreement.  Kelley sought to operate the well, which ECR rejected due
to Kelley's poor track record in drilling deep S. Louisiana wells.  Rozel
Energy is the operator in absence of Enron having an operating vehicle.
Rozel employed a seasoned contract operator in S. Louisiana, Stokes and
Speiler, who are being managed daily by Arvel Martin and Bob Devine, who each
have over 25 years experience in mangement of drilling operations.

Inasmuch as the operation of the well was in dispute, the negotiation of the
JOA and the farmout agreement was strained and Kelley was non-responsive to
Allen's efforts to finalize the agreement.  Allen, Craig Fox, Arvel Martin
and I met with Kelley's Land Manager and VP of Operations and established a
dialogue and rapport (we thought).  The initial draft of the farmout
agreement was put together on Sept. 15th by Kelley and Allen.  Allen did not
share the draft with you then as we were still apart on certain deal
provisions, particularly who would operate.  ECR members were in dispute over
the importance of operations.

With Kelley's consent and our high level of confidence that we would reach
terms with Kelley, we moved our rig in and spudded the well a few days prior
to the Sept. 28th lease expiration.  Allen and I continued to be frustrated
with not reaching final contract terms with Kelley after the well was
spudded.  I pressed Allen to finalize an agreement and he presented an
agreement signed by Kelley on October 16, 2000 (effective Sept. 15, 2000).
Following my signature and upon his departure to Kelley's offices to deliver
the document, I asked him if you had reviewed JOA and he said no.  I asked
him if it was required or customary for Legal to review JOAs, and he said it
was sometimes done but there are rarely revisions.  I did not ask
specifically about farmout agreements.  The Kelley farmout was the first
farmout in a directly-owned asset that I had encountered.  I failed to
recognize the distinction between numerous farmouts that I had seen executed
by our GP's in our Juniper, Bonne Terre (historically) and Texland ventures,
and a farmout with Enron's name on the line.

It is my job as a Vice President to know what requires Legal review.  I have
been made aware that farmout agreements and JOA's in directly owned assets
(as opposed to LP's with a GP such as Juniper) require Legal review and
signoff.  The compliance meeting last week underscored that point.  We had
outside counsel (Lisa Jaubert) under your direction review the Tri-C and
Manti farmout agreements and your initials are evidence of your approval.

I respect you as an attorney and business partner and commit that I will be
diligent about obtaining your review of agreements and ask you when in doubt
as to whether legal review and approval is required on a particular item or
issue.

The demands that our large oil & gas exploration portfolio places on you is
another issue that we should discuss.  The Bonne Terre, Cypress and Vastar
ventures have significant drilling activity that has commenced and will
continue.  Dissolution of Bonne Terre and distribution of the assets to ENA
(to be held in BT Exploration LLC) will increase the legal and commercial
activity level.  We have another prospect in Cypress that is being promoted
and will be spudded in the next 10 days, so expect to see a farmout agreement
on the S. Riceville prospect late next week.

I would be pleased to discuss these matters with you and Mark Haedicke in
person if you desire.  I regret my failure to obtain your review and approval
of the Kelley farmout agreement and commit to preventing a repeat of the
mistake.  I am concerned about the pace of agreements that we face in the
immediate future on our direct-owned ventures.   I look forward to working
with you on ways to better manage our business process in Cypress-Acadian,
Bonne Terre & Vastar ventures.


we are playing tenn.  they are going to hammer us.  i am going in.  it should
be on at 530 espn your time.  griese and davis starting sunday?


---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/07/2002
02:00 PM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
03/07/2002 01:44 PM
To: Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
cc: Ulrich Schomakers/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron@ENRON,
Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Marecic/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Antwort: Availability Definitions

Hello Klaus,

I am trying to do a comparison between the 1.5 MW availability definitions
used in Germany versus the one used here in the US.  Per your attached
e-mail, we both use the Enron Availability (EA) definition, however the
definitions are different due to the number of available counters in the PLC
and the placement of the "MT" term in the equations.  In Europe you are
limited to 4 counters while the US VisuPro has 7 and in Europe you include
the MT term in both the numerator and the denominator while in the US we only
include it in the denominator but we deduct 4 hours per month as a
maintenance allowance.

With respect to the timers, the differences center on how 8 status timers are
treated which result in a slightly higher availability for US turbines given
the same operating conditions.  The status timers are: "Overvoltage",
"Undervoltage", "Underfrequency", "Overfrequency", "Outside Temperature too
low", "Gear oil temp too low", "Line fault voltage" and "Line fault
frequency".  In the European EA these values are counted as "Down Time" and
are added in the denominator but not in the numerator resulting in a larger
denominator and therefore a lower overall availability.  In the US EA these
terms are added in both the denominator and the numerator thereby resulting
in no change, either negative nor positive.

With respect to the "MT" term, the European EA includes this number in both
the numerator and denominator which means the "MT" term does not affect
European EA regardless of how much time a European turbine stays in
maintenance mode.  In the US the use of the "MT" term results in a lower EA
result for values where the maintenance time exceeds 4 hours per month (48
hours per year).

This brings me to my questions:
1.  Do the 8 status timers result in very significant impact on the EA term
in Germany and throughout Europe?
2.  Can you quantify, in percent EA, the impact of these 8 status timers for
some typical turbines?
3.  Can you give me an example of how much "MT" time you accumulate in a
month for a typical turbine?

If you have any other thoughts or ideas on how we might quantify the
differences between the two EA definitions I would like to hear them.

Best Regards,
Hollis

---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/06/2002
03:09 PM ---------------------------

Klaus Holtel@TWTDE
03/06/2002 02:09 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Ulrich Schomakers/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE,
Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Klaus
Eilermann/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE
cc: Klaus Eilermann/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Andrea
Meiners/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Uwe Geisink/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE

Subject: Re: Antwort: Availability Definitions

Hi Hollis,

in VisuPro we have two different calculations of "EA" = Enron Availability.

One for new VisuPro version and PLC program for USA (Montfort, Klondike, ...)
and the other for the old VisuPro version for Europe.

The Remote Control department use for the montly availability report to Adam
Umanoff the calculation:

  Enron Availability: EA[%] = (SOT+ MT) / (SOT+DT+MT+RT) * 100%

Europe:
The running PLC program of the Bachmann controller in Europe supports only 4
Timer:

Timer:
System Ok Time  SOT
Down Time    DT
Maintenance Time  MT
Repair Time   RT

Survey Time (ST)  = SOT+DT+MT+RT

Availability:
Enron Availability: EA[%] = (SOT+ MT) / (SOT+DT+MT+RT) * 100%

USA:
The PLC program and VisuPro for USA supports 7 Timer:

Timer:
System Ok Time  SOT
Down Time    DT
Maintenance Time  MT
Repair Time   RT
Line Out Time    LOT
Weather Out Time  WOT
External Stop Time  EOT

Survey Time (ST)  = SOT+DT+MT+RT+LOT+WOT+EOT

Availability:
Enron Availability:  EA[%] = (SOT+LOT+WOT+EST) / (SOT+DT+LOT+WOT+EST+MT+RT) *
100%

Kind Regards,
Klaus Holtel & Klaus Eilermann

---------------------- Weitergeleitet von Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE am
06.03.2002 09:44 ---------------------------

Klaus Eilermann
06.03.2002 09:25
An: Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie:
Thema: Re: Antwort: Availability Definitions

wie besprochen ...
----- Weitergeleitet von Klaus Eilermann/SERVICE/TWT/DE am 06.03.02 09:27
-----

	Ulrich Schomakers
	05.03.02 21:23

		 An: Klaus Eilermann/SERVICE/TWT/DE, Andrea Meiners/SERVICE/TWT/DE, Uwe
Geisink/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE
		 Kopie:
		 Thema: Re: Antwort: Availability Definitions

Klaus,
could you please answer that email and explain it correctly, that everybody
understands it. Discuss that with Andrea and Uwe.
Please do that tomorrow.

Thanks
Uli

---------------------- Weitergeleitet von Ulrich Schomakers/SERVICE/TWT/DE am
05.03.2002 09:21 PM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough@ENRON
05.03.2002 07:53 PM
An: Ulrich Schomakers/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie:
Thema: Re: Antwort: Availability Definitions

Uli,

At the bottom of this document there are 4 calculations for availability.
They are Machine, Operational, Line and Enron Availability.  Which one of
these availabilities do you include in your monthly reports to Adam when you
are reporting availability?

Best Regards,
Hollis

Ulrich Schomakers@TWTDE
02/22/2002 06:35 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Antwort: Availability Definitions

Hollis,

here our calculation.

Best regards
Uli

Hollis Kimbrough@ENRON
21.02.2002 07:49 PM
An: Ulrich Schomakers/SERVICE/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie: Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON
Thema: Availability Definitions

Hello Ule!

In the Senior Management reporting (for Adam) can you provide me a definition
of the availability terms you propose to use?  We want to compare them to the
definitions we are going to use to ensure that they are similar.

Right now our plan is to use the Enron Availability definition
(SOT+LOT+WOT+EST)/(SOT+DT+LOT+WOT+EST+MT+RT) from the VisuPro system for the
1.5 MW WTG and the Machine Availability (Op Hours/ Line Hours) for the other
turbines.

Best Regards,
Hollis


Start Date: 12/13/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121305.txt


R. Todd Gross
NYMEX/Location/Basis Options
281-340-0875

Again Jesus said, 'Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am
sending you.'
John 20:21 (NIV)

Jesus again identified himself with his Father. He told the disciples by
whose authority he did his work. Then he passed the job to his disciples of
spreading the gospel of salvation around the world. Whatever God has asked
you to do, remember: (1) your authority comes from God, and (2) Jesus has
demonstrated by words and actions how to accomplish the job he has given
you. As the Father sent Jesus, Jesus sends his followers...and you.


From:  Michel Nelson                           12/16/99 05:50 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EES

Rich - Is this really worth the hassle? All the upside is on the side of EES,
all the downside (work) appears to be on our side. It would appear to me that
EES could rent an office in some executive office space provider .....but
maybe I don't have my Enron hat on.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/16/99 05:34 PM

To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EES

If the cost savings are worth a little bit of hassle, we can do this.  We'll
need to make a FERC filing by the end of the 1st Q 2000 to identify the
"shared facilities."  Also, if you decide to go forward, don't do it until
1-1-2000 so we don't have to scramble to get the info in front of FERC this
quarter.  Let me and Maria know what you decide to do and we'll arrange a
briefing on the specific rules to be aware of and we'll make sure we
understand the situation fully so we can properly disclose to FERC what is
up.  Please call with any questions. Thanks.  DF

Rich Jolly on 12/15/99 06:38:43 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EES

Drew are we OK to go with this? We don't have any "confidential
transportation-related information in our office. We do have some operating
agreements and contracts but they aren't confidential that I know of.
Rich

Drew Fossum
12/08/99 05:18 PM

To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EES

EES is a marketing affiliate, so we do need to be careful about shared
computer systems, phone systems, staplers, paper clips, etc.  If Rich and his
office have no "confidential transportation-related information"  we might be
able to do it, otherwise, the hassles and expense of building marketing
affiliate firewalls might make it counterproductive.   I'm forwarding this to
the experts for a quick yup or nope on this.  Thanks. DF

Michel Nelson
12/08/99 05:24 PM
To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EES

Rich - Per your phone mail, I see no reason why an EES employee couldn't
office in your Region Office, providing he/she pays rent and we not break any
market affiliate rules (if they apply here).

Drew - Saving $ for Enron. Any issues I'm overlooking?

Mike


here are the last two on the list

Taria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Reed, Taria
Subject:	RE: Datasheet

I just got handed another list...

Can I get the datasheets for the following companies:

Enron Global Markets LLC
Enron Liquids Fuels, Inc.
Enron Fuels Caribbean L.P.
Enron Petrochemicals Company
Enron Gas Liquids, Inc.
Enron Clean Fuels Company
Enron Reserve Acquisition Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Singapore Pte Ltd
Enron Capital & Trade Global Resources Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade International Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade International Corp. - Singapore Branch

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reed, Taria
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Datasheet

Attached are datasheets for:
Enron North America Corp.
Enron Canada Corp.
Enron Power Marketing Inc.
ECT Investments, Inc.
Enron Credit Inc.
(all on one document)

Taria Reed
Corporate Secretary Department
ext. 57628

 << File: datasheets.doc >>


alewis@ect.enron.com, hello,

Top Options Market Maker Jon "Dr. J" Najarian invites you
to his personal and comprehensive Options Seminar.

Option Wizard provides the scholarship discount.

Order from the store at http://option-wizard.com,
and receive your choice:

Option Wizard Online software package or
$400 cash rebate

Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.

SCHEDULE
Monday, January 22 - Tuesday, January 23
Chicago, IL Regal Knickerbocker Hotel

Sunday, February 11 - Monday, February 12
San Francisco, CA Embassy Suites San Francisco Airport

Plus 3 more . . .

COMPLETE SCHEDULE, BIO, AGENDA, OTHER SEMINARS
http://option-wizard.com/seminar.shtml

***********************************************************

BRIEFLY:

***********************************************************

Scan Wizard review in December, 2000 issue of
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF STOCKS AND COMMODITIES.  traders.com.

***********************************************************

Latest Option Wizard feature:  Earnings and Options,
Jan. 2001 ACTIVE TRADER magazine.  activetradermag.com.
Issue may also include Scan Wizard review.

***********************************************************

LEADER IN MACINTOSH REAL TIME: TRENDSETTER PRO ANALYST V. 4
Just got 500% faster with new Internet feed.
So powerful, some buy a Mac just to run Pro Analyst.
http://www.trendsoft.com/ProAnalyst/main.htm

***********************************************************

TOP MARKET TIMER BERNIE SCHAEFFER'S MONDAY MORNING ALERT.  FREE!
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/redirect.asp?CODE=G800KW&PAGE=1

==========================================================

All the holiday best,   Option Wizard   http://option-wizard.com

***********************************************************

REMOVE   mailto:remove@option-wizard.com?subject=Remove


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:56 AM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	02/08/2001 05:01 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>,
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Mike
Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Robert
Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Andy
Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug
Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>
		 Subject: Governor's Executive Orders

Attached are the Governor's Executive Orders and letters to FERC and Bush
signed today, in one document.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - EXECUTIVE ORDERs.doc