Updated Friday, July 13, 2001 9:33 Pacific Time
Another rate increase -- The California Department of Water Resources, the
agency purchasing a bulk of the state's power needs in lieu of the three
investor-owned utilities, is expected to tell state regulators Friday that
they need to increase electricity rates by as much as 25%. This is because
there are insufficient funds in the current revenue stream to cover a $13.4
billion bond sale, three commissioners with the Public Utilities Commission
told Dow Jones Newswires late Thursday. Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires
<http://www.business.com/directory/energy_and_environment/electric_power_uti
lities/news/full_story/index.asp?uuid=DAC275B5-68A2-4006-AFF5-AD96BF4236EF&s
ource=Dow%20Jones> -- 7/13/01
Judge rejects refunds -- California's claim for $8.9 billion in refunds for
excessive electricity charges "cannot be substantiated," the federal
government's chief energy regulatory judge said yesterday, concluding his
two-week attempt to mediate the California energy dispute. Curtis L. Wagner
Jr., chief judge of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, said "very
large refunds" are due the state because of overcharging by generators,
saying the figure would probably amount to more than $1 billion. Peter Behr
in the Washington Post
<http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55580-2001Jul12.html> John
Woolfolk and Steve Johnson in the San Jose Mercury
<http://www0.mercurycenter.com/premium/local/docs/refund13tk.htm> Mike
Taugher in the Contra Costa Times
<http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/california/stories/wagner_20010713.htm
> Toby Eckert in the San Diego Union
<http://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/fri/news/news_1n13ferc.html> --
7/13/01
Judge spells out opposition to power refund claim -- In a final written
ruling that portrayed California negotiators as obstinate and unwilling to
compromise, the judge who led talks over electricity price refunds said
yesterday the state's claim of $8.9 billion in overcharges "has not and
cannot be substantiated." Three days after negotiations to reach an
agreement ended in failure, Curtis Wagner Jr., the chief administrative law
judge of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, said any refund to
California would have to be much less than what state representatives
sought -- and would not come in cash. Christian Berthelsen in the San
Francisco Chronicle
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/07/13/MN162115.DTL> -
- 7/13/01
Key pieces of power puzzle to be revealed -- Negotiations over two critical
pieces of California's energy crisis - Southern California Edison's
financial stability and the state's ability to pay for its energy
obligations - are coming to a head after months of wrangling. The Assembly
today will see a draft of a plan that would result in huge rate increases
for businesses. John Howard, Hanh Kim Quach and Kate Berry in the Orange
County Register <http://www.ocregister.com/news/rates00713cci.shtml> --
7/13/01
Edison rescue -- A week before its annual summer recess, the California
Legislature remains deeply divided over Gov. Gray Davis' plan to rescue
Southern California Edison from financial ruin--and a growing number of
lawmakers are proposing to let the state's second largest utility fall into
bankruptcy. Convinced that Davis' plan is political suicide, leading
Democrats in the Assembly and Senate on Thursday advanced slimmed-down
alternatives to save Edison. Miguel Bustillo and Nancy Vogel in the Los
Angeles Times
<http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-000057386jul13.story?coll=la%2Dheadlin
es%2Dcalifornia> Kevin Yamamura and Emily Bazar in the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert04_20010713.html> -- 7/13/01
Rate hike may hit businesses -- Businesses would be socked with a big rate
increase, while residential rates could hold steady, under the latest plan
to rescue Southern California Edison and resolve major energy matters the
state has been wrangling over since January. The proposal by Assembly
Democrats likely will draw fire from business interests. Rates easily could
triple for some companies. Meantime, the Davis administration was wrapping
up a plan likely to include further rate hikes to pay for $13.4 billion in
borrowing planned this fall. John Howard, Hanh Kim Quach and Kate Berry in
the Orange County Register
<http://www.ocregister.com/news/rates0s0713cci2.shtml> -- 7/13/01
2 sides face off at EPA hearing on regulating energy plant emissions --
Power plants, refineries and factories need relief from federal clean air
laws if they are expected to respond to energy needs during a crisis,
industry officials told the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency yesterday.
California regulators and environmentalists, on the other hand, said the
federal policy that requires the best available pollution control equipment
to be installed when a new pollution source comes online is absolutely
necessary to protect air quality and health. Jane Kay in the San Francisco
Chronicle
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/07/13/MN233685.DTL>
Chris Bowman in the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert05_20010713.html> Amy Chance in
the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert07_20010713.html> -- 7/13/01
Plan uses public in refund demand -- The Democratic-led state Senate intends
to fill constituent mailboxes with a taxpayer-financed appeal urging
Californians to demand nearly $9 billion in energy price refunds from
"greedy out-of-state power generators." Senate leader John Burton (D-San
Francisco) said the mailers will ask Californians to join the Senate and
Gov. Gray Davis in insisting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
order the refunds of alleged overcharges. Carl Ingram in the Los Angeles
Times
<http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-000057428jul13.story?coll=la%2Dhead
lines%2Dpolitics> -- 7/13/01
State lawmakers lobby for refund on energy purchases -- Thwarted in their
quest for an $8.9 billion refund from wholesale power suppliers, state
officials began applying political pressure Thursday on federal regulators
who will set refund levels. A month after pressure from Congress prompted
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to accept price controls on
electricity, House Democrats from California urged FERC to support Gov. Gray
Davis' refund demands. Dale Kasler in the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert06_20010713.html> -- 7/13/01
Governor hopes 'New FERC' will order refunds -- California Governor Gray
Davis Thursday said he hoped the newly-reconsituted Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission would order $8.9 billion in refunds for the state for
electricity overcharges, despite a FERC judge's report to the commission
that the refund amount was too high. "I would like to believe the
commission, with two new commissioners, will be more sensitive to California
consumers and order all the refunds that are due," Davis said in a
statement. Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires
<http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/story/djbn/?story=/news/stories/
dj/20010712/BT20010712009356.htm&symbol=PCG> -- 7/13/01
Lawmakers tell FERC to act on power refunds -- The U.S. Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission should act on California's demand for refunds on
electricity sales without convening a 60-day evidentiary proceeding as
called for by the commission's chief administrative law judge. That's the
message 31 House Democrats from California sent in a letter Thursday to the
five-member regulatory panel. Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires
<http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/story/djbn/?story=/news/stories/
dj/20010712/BT20010712009404.htm&symbol=PCG> -- 7/13/01
Customers get a payback for conservation -- Nearly a third of Pacific Gas &
Electric customers who have received this month's bill got rebates totaling
$7.6 million as a reward for slashing electricity use in June, the utility
said yesterday. The program that cuts 20 percent off ratepayers' bills if
they reduce usage by 20 percent was a high-profile initiative by Gov. Gray
Davis to promote conservation and decrease dependence on out-of-state
generators. Joe Garofoli in the San Francisco Chronicle
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/07/13/MN186973.DTL>
Dana Hull in the San Jose Mercury
<http://www0.mercurycenter.com/local/center/reb071301.htm> Dominic Berbeo
and Dana Bartholomew in the Los Angeles Daily News
<http://www.dailynews.com/news/articles/0701/13/new23.asp> -- 7/13/01
Enron profits -- Energy trader Enron Corp. said Thursday that second-quarter
profit rose 40% as its sales of natural gas and electricity surged in
California and elsewhere. Net income rose to $404 million, or 45 cents a
share, from $289 million, or 34 cents, in the year-earlier period. The story
is in the Los Angeles Times
<http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000057358jul13.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines
%2Dbusiness> -- 7/13/01
Records suggest Duke was low-price supplier -- Internal documents give a
broader view of power pricing in California's energy crisis and show that
Duke Energy was one of the state's lowest-priced providers. An analysis by
The Charlotte Observer shows the state paid an average of $269 per
megawatt-hour for $3.5 billion of power during the first quarter, according
to documents from the state's Department of Water Resources. Duke was the
fourth-largest supplier to the agency, which buys about one-third of the
state's power. Stella Hopkins in the Orange County Register
<http://www.ocregister.com/news/duke00713cci.shtml> -- 7/13/01
7 California advisers own energy stocks -- At least seven consultants hired
by Gov. Gray Davis to help California buy and deliver power own stock in
power companies doing business with the state, according to financial
statements released yesterday. The personal financial statements prompted
Secretary of State Bill Jones, an announced GOP candidate for governor, to
call for an investigation into a conflict of interest that Jones said could
compromise California's position as an electricity buyer. Mark Martin in the
San Francisco Chronicle
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/07/13/MN98940.DTL> --
7/13/01
Calpine proposes power plant for Alviso -- Alviso, the long-neglected North
San Jose neighborhood abutting five landfills and a sewage treatment plant,
may become the site of two major power plants as well. Calpine has proposed
a 260-megawatt plant to power what would be the world's largest Internet
server farm. This may be good news to the people of Alviso, since the plant
would emit less smog than 89 diesel generators that would have been used
otherwise. Mike Zapler in the San Jose Mercury
<http://www0.mercurycenter.com/premium/local/docs/alviso13.htm> -- 7/13/01
Power plant clears hurdle -- Despite a momentary snag, legislation clearing
the way for repairing and restarting the old Pacific Gas & Electric Corp.
power plant on Coffee Road passed the state Senate unanimously Thursday. It
now goes back to the Assembly for what is expected to be routine endorsement
of Senate amendments, and then moves to Gov. Gray Davis' desk for his
signature. Vic Pollard in the Bakersfield Californian --
<http://www.bakersfield.com/local/Story/700427p-700304c.html> 7/13/01
Davis and energy and polls -- California Governor Gray Davis's popularity is
bouncing back, and pollsters credit the Democratic lawmaker's campaign to
blame the state's energy problems on out-of-state power companies. Davis has
criticized Duke Energy Corp., Enron Corp. and other power sellers as price
gougers since January. This week, Davis used a power-plant opening as a
platform to claim that energy sellers are ``bleeding us dry.'' The
Democratic state attorney general and Democratic-controlled state Senate are
investigating the firms for market manipulation. David Ward and Daniel Taub
at bloomberg.com
<http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?T=marketsquote99_news.ht&s=AO06dKBTNQ2
FsaWZv> -- 7/13/01
Cal-Fed funding approved -- Senate committee Thursday approved $135 million
for California water projects next year, including about $40 million in
projects related to the joint state-federal partnership called Cal-Fed and
$22.5 million for Sacramento area flood-control work. The spending measure
for energy and water projects cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee.
After its approval by the full Senate, the House and Senate will sit down to
reconcile their differing bills. David Whitney in the Fresno Bee
<http://www.fresnobee.com/localnews/story/0,1724,281801,00.html> -- 7/13/01
Senate panel OKs water, flood-control funds -- A Senate committee Thursday
approved $135 million for California water projects next year, including
$22.5 million for Sacramento-area flood-control work. The spending measure
for energy and water projects cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee.
If it is approved by the full Senate, the House and Senate will try to
reconcile their bills. David Whitney in the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert13_20010713.html> -- 7/13/01
Senate holds fast on Klamath plan -- The Senate defeated an effort Thursday
to turn back the clock on the Endangered Species Act and release water to
parched Klamath basin farmers in Northern California and southern Oregon.
The 52-48 vote killed an amendment to a 2002 Interior Department spending
bill that would have effectively scuttled a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
directive that turned off the flow of irrigation waters in the
drought-plagued basin in April in order to protect endangered salmon and
suckerfish. David Whitney in the Sacramento Bee
<http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert14_20010713.html> -- 7/13/01
Smog -- Smog in the United States increased dramatically through the first
half of the year, jumping 25 percent above the same period last year, a
Mercury News analysis of state air-quality records has found. But while
California and the nation were doing worse overall, the Bay Area improved
slightly, with the number of smog violations falling from two to one. Seth
Borenstein in the San Jose Mercury
<http://www0.mercurycenter.com/premium/nation/docs/smog13.htm> -- 7/13/01
Copyright , 2001 Rough & Tumble


I thought I would send this to you and you could just try to guess what we
want to do.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 10:31
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/14/2000 10:28 AM

To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WestLB docs

Here's a start...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 10:28
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           07/14/2000 10:25 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WestLB docs

Kay - I contacted Jim Burns and asked him to send me the WestLB docs.  Here
they are.  If you need anything else let me know and I can get it directly
from Jim.  He is very familiar with the WestLB facility.

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000
10:18 AM ---------------------------

j.burns@pecorp.com on 07/14/2000 09:40:34 AM
To: Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: WestLB docs

Gregg

Per our conversation

 <<Acquisition Ag exec>>  <<Cash Collateral Deposit Ag exec>>

JAB

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Acquisition Ag exec.doc
 - Cash Collateral Deposit Ag exec.doc


Jim, hold off until I let you know to go.

Thanks
dave


If you have information to complement or complete what is here, please let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stark, Cindy   On Behalf Of Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Smith, Gary; McCarty, Danny; Lowry, Phil; Hayslett, Rod; Hartsoe, Joe; Hotte, Steve; Fossum, Drew; Corman, Shelley; Cordes, Bill
Subject:	DRAFT STATUS REPORT ON ETS 2001 GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Importance:	High

Attached is a draft on the status of 2001 Goals & Objectives for ETS.  Please review and provide Cindy with any comments/answers.

Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel:   713/853-6197
Fax:  713/345-7047
Cindy.Stark@enron.com


Opps.  Didn't mean to leave you out!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/10/2001 10:14 AM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Revised notices for CA I and CAII

I'm attaching the notices for CA I and CA II.  Please pay particular
attention to CA II, since it is the first time it has been circulated.
Obviously, we will need to insert the final purchase numbers.

Lisa, I set it up so ENA is consenting, which tracks the language in the DCMA.

Kay


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     Search  Amazon.com for:

 We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather  not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please  visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please  note that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  sneal@ei.enron.com

[IMAGE]


Is there any migration risk, i.e., can customers choose in Connecticutt?
That will be one of the first questions.


Hi Rod!  Kevin has requested that I book some time on your calendar.  I realize that Kathy is out and no one else seems to have access to your calendar.  I talked to Pam but she can't view it.  Here are the time allotments needed:

1 hour - Kevin Howard/Davis Thames (topic: unknown) - Monday

1 hour - Kevin Howard/Jeff McMahon (topic: EGS financing activities)

Please let me know what you time slots you have available on Monday for these meetings so I may confirm.

Terri Bachand

Enron Global Finance
(713)853-6528


Jim and Rex:

The Lehman Bros. form of "put" works fine from a legal perspective.
Yesterday, I faxed to you one of the "puts" with underlined language
reflecting differences in securities language from our prior swap/forward
deals with Lehman.  The differences may be alright for purposes of the "puts".

Please let Jeff know if the "puts" are acceptable for execution (from the
securities perspective).  I have already initialed the documents from the
swap perspective.  Let me know if you have any questions.

As usual, thanks for your help.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Raquel -

Thanks for the message.  I will get the letter and Password App. out to you
tomorrow.  As to the ETA, the reason we do a side letter on the changes is
because every user of EnronOnline is required to "click" on the on-line ETA
prior to using the system.  Accordingly, the process is really this -

- PGW completes the PA and submits it to EnronOnline
- Presuming approval of the PA, EnronOnline issues the appropriate password
and user id to PGW
 - PGW signs onto the system using the password and user id
 - After being asked to change the password, the on-line ETA appears and PGW
must "click" to accept in order to use the system

Since the ETA is not agreed to until access is first obtained to the system,
if you want to wait to sign the amendment letter, that is fine.  Either way,
I will have them forwarded.

Please let me know if you should need anything further.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Raquel Guzman <Raquel.Guzman@pgworks.com>
	04/26/2001 10:47 AM

		 To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc: Ben Moroz <Ben.Moroz@pgworks.com>
		 Subject: RE: FW: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA

Thanks Mark.  They look OK.  I think Enron needs to send them to us, because
the sideletter to the Electronic Trading Agreement ("ETA") needs to be on
Enron letterhead (see attached).  If it is acceptable to you, please send
the Password App, ETA, and Side Letter to my attention at:

Raquel N. Guzman
Philadelphia Gas Works
Legal Department
Philadelphia, PA  19122

Thanks for your help on this one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Raquel Guzman
Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA

Raquel -

The attached two documents are the ones in Leslie's file for this matter.
If these are acceptable to PG, please let me know and have hard copies
forwarded.

(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Works.doc)      (See attached file:
Philadelphia Gas Password.doc)

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

                    Raquel Guzman

                    <Raquel.Guzman@pg        To:
"'mark.greenberg@enron.com'"
                    works.com>               <mark.greenberg@enron.com>

                                             cc:

                    04/25/2001 04:07         Subject:     FW: Letter
Agreement re EnronOnline
                    PM                       ETA

Mark:  Thanks for looking into this.  I will pass on the good news to my
folks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie.Hansen@enron.com [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 11:03 AM
To: Raquel.Guzman@pgworks.com
Subject: RE: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA

Raquel:

Please see my proposed revisions to the Password App.  Let me know if this
addresses your concerns.  If so, please provide me with the full name of PG
Works, as well as the mailing address and recipient for the side letter so
that I can finalize.

Regards,

Leslie

(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Password.doc)

                    Raquel Guzman

                    <Raquel.Guzman@pg        To:
"'Leslie.Hansen@enron.com'" <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>
                    works.com>               cc:

                                             Subject:     RE: Letter
Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
                    09/14/2000 09:16

                    AM

Leslie:  Thanks.  My only comment is that your suggested language should
also apply to Condition (2), second paragraph, of the "Enron Online
Password
Application." Please let me know if you concur.  Thanks.

     ----------
     From:  Leslie.Hansen@enron.com [SMTP:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
     Sent:  Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:43 PM
     To:  raquel.guzman@pgworks.com
     Subject:  Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA

     Raquel:

     Attached please find the letter agreement amending Section 4(b) of
the
     EnronOnline Electronic Trading Agreement as per our discussion.
Please let
     me know if you have any questions or comments.

     Regards,

     Leslie Hansen
     (713) 853-6121

     (See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Works.doc)<<File: Philadelphia
Gas Works.doc>>

(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Password.doc)


So how do you say "bitch" in Spanish?


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/15/2001>, published as of 10/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


We have attempted to operationalize the Alliance - AOS contract between Enron
North America and Crestar (now Keyspan) as follows:

8:00 am - Alliance announce the % of AOS that will flow the next gas day
(weekend)

9:00 am - Crestar (Keyspan) determines economic viability and informs Enron ,
by phone, of AOS volumes to Enron's central cash desk
               (Patrice Thurston)
  *** The deal will be 'done' at this time as per the AOS contract.

  (Note --  Crestar is in the process of assigning a portion the AOS contract
to BP.  After this assignment has been approved by Enron,
   BP and Crestar will notify Enron of daily AOS volumes)

9:45 am - Enron informs Crestar (Keyspan)   { and BP after contract
assignment}  the contract numbers, volumes, pipelines, and other required
 nominations information
 - Crestar (Keyspan) {and BP after contract assignment}  will nominate on
Alliance to ENA

10:30  - Nominations deadline (1st cycle)

12:00 - Pipelines will (should) confirm all nominations

(all times are MST)

If you have any questions please contact me ASAP.

Contact list - this is an incomplete this so please e-mail me the updated
info and I will compile and distribute the  complete list

Enron North America - Patrice Thurston 713-83-5772   /  Mark
Enron  Canada Corp. - Grant Oh  403-974-6778  ,,  Liz Prior 403-974-6725

Crestar / Keyspan - Bruce Kohrs 403-205-7684 ,   Jim Pearson,    Gerry Kurtz

BP - Elizabeth Bartnes
BP - Kelvin Williams 403-233-5738

Kelvin please e-mail Patrice and myself an accounting contact name and number
so that we can our accounting people ready.

Thanks,

Grant


Dee/Pat/Rick:  Here is the diligence memo.  Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 07/09/2000 07:13
PM ---------------------------

"GEORGE T. LEE" <GTLEE@LLGM.COM> on 07/09/2000 07:07:28 PM
To: <MICHELLE.cash@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Employee Benefits Due Diligence

Michelle, attached is our June 22nd due diligence memo that we thought we had
forwarded to Dolores Linfest.  Perhaps we did not have a correct e-mail
address.  Please call me at 713-287-2066 if you have any questions.

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be protected by the  attorney/client or other priviliges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intentded
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by
return mail, e-mail or at 713-287-2066.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments is
prohibited and may be unlawful.  George T. Lee, gtlee@llgm.com.
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:04:50 -0400
From: "ANN MURRAY" <AMURRAY@LLGM.COM>
To: <Dolores.Lenfest@enron.com>
Subject: Employee Benefits Due Diligence
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_FEA6A3D5.A5C4E8A4"

Ms. Lenfest,

Benjamin Clark requested that we forward the attached employee benefits due
diligence directly to you.  As you will note from the highlighted text, the
information provided thus far raises numerous questions relating to employee
benefits matters.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Ann Murray

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be
protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including
attachments,
constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the
designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments, and notify me
by return mail, e-mail or at (904) 630-5336.  The unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and
may be unlawful.

Ann E. Murray
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae
50 N. Laura St. Suite 2800
Jacksonville, FL 32202
(904) 630-5336
amurray@llgm.com

 - 0151526.02


Does anybody want to go see him on Friday March 30?

Let me know.


- cj_3456.jpg


The last two LTNW deals - 349864 and 318870 are changed to correct time
zones. They gave me the option to choose "no" for rerouting of schedules.
They were both EOL deals.

Kate

Cara Semperger
03/23/2001 01:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: A whole bunch of deal errors that I want your opinion on .

I just ran a forward ob for April 2 to check for deals that are in PST when
they should be PDT.

Do you want to change all of these to PPT deals, or do you have time
constraints today?  I need these changed today because we are already setting
up for April.

SW Regions
347721
353734
353813
407053
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

NW Regions
318870
349864

I am particularly worried about how these are corrected because they are long
term transmission deals that cannot be autoscheduled.
503107
503112


i can't go right now.  i have to wait on someone to look at my computer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

coffee?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

BIG BRAT!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

bye

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am not going to replay a drunken conversation with you.  you will have to remember on your own.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whats not the same

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

what are you talking about?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:47 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

i cant figure out what i meant


email me, please


The FINAL Violation Memos for 11/26/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV:  http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification memo Section.


I regret to inform you that Glenn Surowiec has decided to leave Enron to pursue other career opportunities.  Glenn has been a welcome addition to the West Power Structuring Desk and his presence and contribution will be missed.  Please join me in wishing Glenn the best of luck in his future career.

Todd A. Perry
Enron North America	503.464.3729 (work)
121 SW Salmon Street	503.807.6106 (cell)
3WTC, 0306		503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204		todd.perry@enron.com


He mentioned some case he had before but I thought he told me he lost that
case. He never told me that he would be filing anything. In fact, he asked me
to write a letter outlining Felix's parental attributes because they were
still looking at what to do.

	"Elmore, Benjamin" <belmore@velaw.com>
	01/16/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Felix Todaro

I just spoke with Koury and he was anything but reasonable.  He has already
filed an application in the Iowa courts for guardianship and conservatorhip
of Alexis, even though the Iowa Code gives parental preference, which is a
difficult preference to overcome.  Also, the Iowa court doesn't have
jurisdiction until Texas says it does.  He said he told you about some case
he took to the Iowa Supreme Court where the Court granted a grandfather
possession and conservatorship over the father who was an out of state
resident.  Do you remember that?
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:22
AM ---------------------------

Patrick Hanse
10/24/2000 10:06 AM
To: Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Update network and offering values for the CE-ALTE and CE-WEC
paths

FYI
Official notice by CE to MAIN that NO Firm ATC exists from CE or Enron L.C.
to either WEC or ALT E. for time period Nov. 2000 - Nov. 2001 due to
restrictions on the Eau Clair-Arpin  flowgate.
---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 09:51
AM ---------------------------

rnm <rnm@maininc.org> on 10/24/2000 09:14:15 AM
To: christopher.nekolny@exeloncorp.com, atc_interestgroup@maininc.org,
atcsc@maininc.org, cmm@maininc.org
cc: Interconnections@ucm.com
Subject: Re: Update network and offering values for the CE-ALTE and CE-WEC
paths

At 04:53 PM 10/23/00 -0500, christopher.nekolny@exeloncorp.com wrote:
>Ray,
>
>The following paths should have their firm network and offering values
>changed on the ComEd page to 0 MW for the time period of
>11/1/2000-11/1/2001.
>CE-ALTE
>CE-WEC
>RKRD-ALTE
>RKRD-WEC
>ENLC-ALTE
>ENLC-WEC
>
>The reason for this change is that while the MAIN Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate
>(that used to calculate MAIN ATC values) has positive capability, the MAPP
>Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate is posted negative for this time period. Since the
>MAPP Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate is not on the contract path for CE-ALTE,
>CE-WEC, RKRD-ALTE, RKRD-WEC, ENLC-ALTE or ENLC-WEC transactions this is a
>valid third party limit for these directions.
>
>Please ensure that the requested directions have a greater than 5 %
>distribution factor on the flowgate during the appropriate seasons prior to
>changing the posted value. For example, it is possible that the Rocky Road
>directions will not have a 5 % distribution factor on the flowgate and
>therefore the posted values would not have to be altered. If you have any
>questions please let me know.
>
>Christopher Nekolny
>
>
>***************************************************************************
******
>This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corp. proprietary
>information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright
>belonging to the Exelon Corp. family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended
>solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If
>you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified
>that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation
>to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited
>and may be unlawful.  If you have received this E-mail in error, please
>notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and
>any copy of this E-mail and any printout.  Thank You.
>***************************************************************************
******
>
>
>


just seeing if you were back from your trip.  maybe we can go for lunch
sometime this week. let me know when you're free.


The memo to investors says that a new law will take effect on Aug 13 that
puts in place shortened appeal times at the CPUC.  The memo says that the
CPUC does not need to act on the key issues, including suspension of DA,
until Aug 13 or later.  It also says the bonds are now to be sold in
Sept-Oct. The memo states that the CPUC, Governor, Treasurer, etc. have
agreed with the new timetable.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001 09:20 AM -----

	"Manuel, Erica" <Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>
	07/03/2001 08:38 AM

		 To: "Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, AReM <arem@electric.com>,
"Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail)" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jalamo@enron.com>, Megan Beiser <megan.beiser@edelman.com>, "'Robert Morgan'
(E-mail)" <rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Investor Memo - Timetable Update

I just received this document from Angelides' office - it's a memo outlining
a revised timetable for the PUC actions required for the bond sale. FYI. EM.

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
[mailto:philip_angelides@treasurer.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:38 AM
To: FITZPATRICK, Charles
Subject: Investor Memo - Timetable Update

Please note the update regarding the State of California DWR Power Bonds
provided in the attached memo.

 <<Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf>>

If you have any questions, please contact Charles Fitzpatrick at (800)
900-3873.

 - Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf


Apparently, we inadvertently rolled the Duke delivery to Mobil refinery into April and gas flowed to Mobil via Centana from Duke April 1, 2, and 3.  I understand that there were no tickets entered into Sitara to cover that flow, so I have captured the transaction in Sitara utilizing the following tickets:

#727481  reflects the HPLC purchase from Duke on Centana's pipe April 1,2,3 total volume estimated to be 21,490mm
#538950  has been updated to show deliveries to Mobil refinery off Centana's pipe for the same time period, same volume
#727497  reflects HPLC selling the gas back to Duke (payback) at the same price it was purchased, a volume of 10,000mm for 4/12, at meter 7001

Please let me know if there are any questions.  If I've screwed something up, my apologies!!


Indeed I am whipping up a meal for a li'l  lady.  I think I'll just go ahead and buy a pyrex, I should probly have  one, thanks though.  I'm not quite sure how it came to be this way, but I'm  doing it at my house instead of hers.  So I have a HUGE chore to prepare  the casa before tomorrow night.  I've already banished Nels to Tatia's  place.

Ah yes, the brewery picture.  Boy did I  feel B-A-D bad that day!  I really had JUST woken up for that.  Ya,  maybe Friday, we can keep in touch.

-RAP

----- Original Message -----
From:  Monique.Sanchez@enron.com
To: rparry@bcm.tmc.edu
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:48  AM
Subject: RE: Random questions
Yo!
Yes, I believe your typical campells will have little  mushroom pieces in
it.  And kmart would be a good place to buy a pyrex  dish (glass
baking)....of course you could borrow any supplies from me any  time.  Are
you cooking up some grub for a lil lady???
I heard you  all had a great time.  Saw the pic of you that john said you
"woke up"  for at the brewery.  Maybe we all can get together for a brew
before  john and i are off for alaska on sunday.  we will be gone for a  week
and a half.  Maybe friday after work.
Let me know if you have  any other cooking q's.
Mo
    -----Original  Message-----
   From:   "Robert A. Parry, M.S., DABMP"  <rparry@bcm.tmc.edu>@ENRON
    Sent:   Monday, June 04, 2001 11:32 AM
    To:     Sanchez, Monique
   Subject:   Random questions
   Hey Momar.  Did you have a  peaceful week?  We had a blast.  I've got a
    couple of Q's for ya.  Does cream of mushroom soup have actual  mushroom
   pieces in it?  And where would  be a good  place to buy a glass
   baking/casserole  dish?
   Thanks,
    Robbie


You have been designated as a member of the &Resource Group8 for purposes of
the Enron Wholesale Services (&EWS8) Chinese Wall policy, which is currently
being revised to reflect the new EWS organizational structure.

 The Chinese Wall policy serves to reduce the risk of insider trading
liability by keeping material non-public information &walled off8 from our
equity trading personnel.  The Resource Group acts as a sort of &filter8 so
that certain information may pass through the "wall", under appropriate
controls.  It is critical that we enforce proper compliance with the Chinese
Wall policy.  Without this policy, Enron would not be able to engage in
equity trading activities.

 Early next year, the ENA Legal Department will conduct training sessions on
Chinese Wall policies and procedures for our equity traders, Resource Group
members, and other appropriate employees.  A larger group of employees will
receive the newly revised policies and procedures and be asked to certify
compliance.  In the meantime, please feel free to call Lance Schuler at
35419, Bob Bruce at 57780, or me at 36544 should you have any questions
concerning the policy or the role of the Resource Group.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/18/2001 08:03 PM -----

	Binky Davidson@EES
	03/15/2001 05:35 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: NewPower Withdrawal Notes

Mark Muller sends the attached for your information and comments.


Hello Monika Causholli,

As per your request, please find attached a list of MPA members.

Best Regards,

Jennifer Austin
Statistician
Pulp and Paper Products Council
(514) 861-8812
jaustin@pppc.org


The Kodak IS 110 copier in EB 38K1 will be down for extensive service
beginning Friday, June 30th, through Tuesday, July 4th.

If you anticipate any large copy jobs, please allow extra time for completion
by the copy center downstairs.  The copier should be functional by Wednesday;
however, it could take longer if they find that certain parts need to be
replaced.

Sorry for the inconvenience, but hopefully we will circumvent future service
problems with this machine.

sc


FYI

Any recollection?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:30 AM ---------------------------
From: Gillian Boyer@ENRON on 11/27/2000 10:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arthur Andersen model validation request

Vince,

                  Our goal is to validate that the Enron Global Market book
administrators are accurately using the "spread option model" as developed by
the Research Group.    To determine this, we would like to provide you with
the inputs for a particular deal (as provided by a Global Markets book
administrator) and have you recalculate the deal value.   We will then
compare your results to the values calculated by Global Markets.

 Two Koch deals have been chosen due to their substantial P/L effect.  I have
attached the deal data in two forms: (1) the spread option model that Kara
Boudreau, Book Administrator EGM, provided and (2) an excel spreadsheet that
isolates the 2 deals.

 If there is anything more that we could provide, please don't hesitate to
call me at  x30968.

 Thank you so much for all of your help.

 Gillian

1.

2.


This is very good work.  You make all the points we need to make without
spraining anything in the process.  You have been doing a superb job under
very difficult circumstances.

On another note:  I don't know if you received my page, but the meeting with
Davis was cancelled so I flew back to Houston.  We are trying to get another
time, perhaps as early as this week.  Davis did meet with Greenspan and
Summers, both of whom we had briefed extensively.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 10:23 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/26/2000 07:05 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, MDay@GMSSR.com, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the
27th/28th

You're right, Sue.  Rates can't go up w/out declaring the rate freeze over in
some fashion---trying to finesse it.  Thanks very much for the comments.
Harry also had a good comment---don't specify the amount of rate increase in
our comments; rather note that the rate increase needs to be well-reasoned
and based on facts and evidence.  Will make that change.

	Susan J Mara
	12/26/2000 06:43 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the
27th/28th

Jeff,

This looks good.  It comes across as moderate in tone-- although probably no
one else will ask to leave the rate freeze in place.

I have a legal question -- Under AB 1890, I don't see anyway that the CPUC
can raise rates without ending the rate freeze first.  Am I missing
something? So, how is it clear that the CCPUC can raise the rates on Feb 1?
It's clear,however,  that once the retained assets are valued that the rates
can be changed.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/26/2000 01:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th

Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings.  Few
points:
Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes.
Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf.
Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will
forward that along for folks review later today.
Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail
(415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317).
We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST).
The call in number is 800.713.8600.  Code is 80435.
The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).


The holiday party is this Saturday!  Please take a minute to review these
last-minute details, guaranteed to make our holiday party an exercise in
efficient merriness.....

1. Remember to RSVP.  If you have not done so, please see Kathy Axford or
Anna Mehrer TODAY.

2. Parking will be provided free of charge. Upon your arrival, tell the
bellhop you are an Enron guest.  Should you choose to park in the structure
across Pine Street from the hotel, take the ticket to the front desk for
validation.

3. Responsible drinking is encouraged.   Complimentary towncar services will
be provided by our friend Elaina at IMAX Trans.  Please contact her before
Friday to make arrangements. She can be reached at 503-358-7214, or via
e-mail at
imaxtrans@hotmail.com.  Please include your preferred pick-up time and
address in the e-mail, and Elaina will schedule accordingly.  And remember -
everyone's in the same holiday boat with an ever-increasing list of gifts to
get, so your gratuity to the driver is appreciated.

4. Embassy Suites is offering rooms to Enron employees at a special rate of
$125+tax on Saturday night.  A  breakfast buffet is included (as are those
little bottles of shampoo and shower caps!).  Please call 503-279-9000 for
reservations, and be sure to ask for the holiday rate.

Robert Hicks and his seven-piece swing band will provide the musical stylings
for the evening, so don't forget to bring your dancing shoes. And our very
own Frank Vickers, auctioneer extraordinaire, will once again bring the house
to its knees for charity. Amen!

Schedule of Events:
6:00-6:45    Reception, hors d'oeuvre and hosted beverages
6:45-8:00    Dinner Buffet
8:00-9:00    Door Prizes and Auction
9:00-11:30  Dance the night away......

We are looking forward to a great time!

If you have any questions or suggestions, please see your Assistant today.

Thanks.

Mollie


looks good

Robin Rodrigue
07/10/2000 09:08 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nicole LaPorte/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canada Exotics

Here are the FT Positions including the Exotics.

Robin


For your information ---

Craig Young
---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Young/NY/ECT on 10/19/2000 04:05 PM
---------------------------

"Rice, Kate" <kate@mfainfo.org>@ls.mfainfo.org on 10/19/2000 02:07:41 PM
Please respond to "Rice, Kate" <kate@mfainfo.org>
Sent by: owner-govrelcomm@ls.mfainfo.org
To: "'govrelcomm@ls.mfainfo.org'" <govrelcomm@ls.mfainfo.org>
cc: "Allen, Julia" <Julia_Allen@dc.sba.com>
Subject: September 6, 2000 Minutes from GRC meeting

October 19, 2000

 Attached is the draft of the minutes from the September 6, 2000
Government Relations Committee meeting.
 You will note there are seven Action Items from the last meeting.
Under Item 2, Overview of Regulatory and Legislative Agenda, it was agreed
that the status of the issues that had been previously referred by the
Committee to various subcommittees would be discussed at the next meeting.
The subcommittee chairs have been reminded of this assignment.  Also under
Item 2, several members agreed to create an outline of the legislative and
regulatory issues that involve ERISA and affect CTA's.  A draft has been
produced.
 Item 6, Uptick Rule, Member Silber volunteered to review the SEC
proposal when it is issued and draft a comment letter.
Item 7, CFTC Reauthorization Legislation, MFA staff was to send members the
letter sent to CFTC Chairman Rainer on the issue of single stock futures.
The letter was sent to members in late September.
 Item 11, MFA International Activities, it was suggested that an
article be placed in the MFA Reporter on the FSF international standards
program and the foreign markets access issue.  The article will appear in
the October issue of the MFA Reporter.
 Item 12, the SOP 95-2, Members Esposito and Pierce, agreed to draft
a comment letter which would suggest more flexible disclosure requirements
for fund of funds.
 Item 13, MFA Initiative on Relaxing Regulation D Advertising, a Task
Force would review and develop an outline regarding marketing restrictions
in Regulation D.

 An agenda and materials for the November 2, 2000 meeting in New York
City will be sent to Committee Members the last week of October.

 <<grcsept6mtgmin.9-7-00.doc>>

Thank you,

Julia C. Allen
Managed Funds Association
2025 M Street, N.W.
Floor 8
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone (202) 367-2404
Fax     (202) 367-2140

 - grcsept6mtgmin.9-7-00.doc


Please print and put with other stuff you just printed.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 03:03
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/20/2000 03:00 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Here is my quick pass through the document (solely FCE's changes).  I will
read it again tonight.


Guess what I found out this morning.   It looks like I'll be rotating out of
this job just in time.  Jeff said Louise Kitchen is just like Shankman.
Yikes...  We've (Jeff and I) not to tell Binh anything about her.  Lavo
stresses her out, so I don't think she'd take the job if she knows it's only
going to get worse!!


Our next conference call will be held this Friday, August 18th at 10:00 a.m.
New York time.  If you wish to participate, please call 888-904-9318 and
give passcode "US REG" and leader is Stacy Carey.

Stacy Carey
Director of U.S. Regulatory Policy


Start Date: 10/5/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100507.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


The word is that giving the notice could put the equipment on the balance
sheet.  If the Coral deal didn't close, the equipment would be tainted.
Therefore, the giving of the notice needs to occur after we feel certain that
the Coral transaction will close.

The assignment and assumption agreement have been reviewed by Rob Taylor, and
he thinks the agreement is fine.

Kay

Raimund Grube
12/04/2000 07:01 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Coral Energy

Kay,

I will be out of the office for the next two days (Tuesday and Wednesday).
We are in the process of getting the DASH signed -- Rebecca Walker will be
pursuing signatures tomorrow.

The other outstanding issues are the Option Notice, the Assignment Agreement
and an agreement with Coral. Have we received an update regarding the Option
Notice from Rob Taylor?

Rebecca needs to know when to send the wire transfer by 2:00 PM on the day
before any funds need to be sent.  In addition, we do need to give WLB at
least two days notice of any wire transfer (formally 5 days, but Rose
Engeldorff indicated that we should be OK with 2 days).

 If you have any questions, you may contact me at 713-516-5409 for the next
two days.  I will be back in the office on Thursday.

Best regards,
Raimund D. Grube


I love you too, sweety.  Have a great day.  See you tonight


Yo baby whats up?  Thanks for hanging out with me on Monday night.  I had a
really good time (even if you were preoccupied with the Dave thing).  I hope
all is going well for you.  I am actually working a day shift which is pretty
cool because there is a lot less to do on the day shifts.  So, what do you
have going for the rest of the week?  I have a work function tonight.  One of
my friends is moving to the Calgary office so we are all going for beers at
the Lucky Lab in southeast.    I got a call from my date from hell.
Aparently I told her last week that we could grab a movie tonight.  I don't
want to go so I think I am just going to tell her that this work thing is
going to last too late.  Anyway how is your grandmother doing?   Are you
excited about your party this weekend?  I went and bought a couple dress
shirts and a tie for my christmas party at Nordstrom yesterday and ended up
spending $184 !  Just on two shirts and a tie.  I should just refrain from
even going to that store.  Check ya later sweetie!


Here is an update on the activities for E-Trans.  Please remember that we are
under confidentiality agreements with the other parties of E-Trans and this
must not be discussed outside the Company.

It appears that the other parties of E-Trans are willing to go to the next
level of discussions on E-Trans and we hope to start discussions of the
commercial and policy issues as early as next week.  The additional parties
will be ALSTOM/ESCA, PJM, CalPx, and APX.  We will begin to discuss the
technical detailing the meshing of the forward and real-time markets and
system integration the following week.

We will also have two ALSTOM/ESCA employees that will be based in Houston to
support the project for the next four weeks.

The Task List and Schedule is as follows:

1. Prepare ESCA Consulting Agreement
2. Determine Commercial Structure for E-Trans
3. Detailed Description of each parties responsibility
4. Begin Technical Discussions
 a. Meshing the real-time and forward markets (Policy)
 b. Integrating the system  (Technical)
6. Product for FERC Filing
 a. Make off-the-self manual (Thane)
 b. FERC Tariff

September 21, 2000
Commercial and Policy Meeting
Chicago
Attendees:
John Florey CalPx
Ed Cazalet/Ralph Samuelson APX
Kenneth Laughlin PJM
Randy Berry Alstom/Esca
Jim Steffes Enron
Janice More
Jeff Brown
Thane Twiggs

September 27-28
Technical Meeting
Houston Woodland,s Conference Center
Attendees:
Andy Ott PJM
Randy Berry ESCA ?
David Sun
Ralph Samuelson? APX
John Flory CALPX
Steve Walton Enron
Lloyd Will
Charles Yeung
Jeff Brown
Thane Twiggs

October 4-5
Technical Meeting
TBD


Looks good to me.  Lets not say anymore about ECS than what Donna has in the last bullet.  Thanks. df

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martens, Donna
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 6:29 PM
To:	Winckowski, Michele; Taylor, Gina; Lindberg, Lorraine; Donoho, Lindy; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Petersen, Keith; Miller, Mary Kay; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	RE: pipeline project questions

Gina -regarding TW's Gallup Project:
 In-service dates were: Bloomfield -4/6/2000; LaPlata "A" -4/20/2000; and Gallup -5/1/2000 (Sempra protest delayed the issuance of certificate until 1/13/2000).
10,000 HP was added at the Gallup Compressor Station; coolers and not compression were constructed at Bloomfield and LaPlata which reduced the temperature of the gas flowing in the San Juan Lateral.  This reduction in temperature caused the lateral and associated down field compressors to operate more efficiently creating an incremental 50,000 Mcf per day of firm capacity on the  Blanco to Thoreau segment of the San Juan Lateral.  The project enabled Transwestern to maintain its mainline operating pressure from Thoreau west to California at 950 psig at all times thereby accommodating shifts in market demand to the east without restricting delivery capacity to California.  As a result, TW is able to once again operate its mainline west of Thoreau at its certificated capacity of 1,090,000.
Total final costs filed with FERC were $13 million.  As stated in the original application, the project was funded with internally generated funds.
Please talk to Drew regarding the rates.
The shipper data is correct.   All the contract terms are for five years with the exception of El Paso Energy at 5 1/2 years and North Star Steel which expires on March 31, 2008.
As the Commission observed in the January 13 Order, ECS is not a jurisdictional company; whereas the motor that they would own is a jurisdictional facility.  Transwestern was therefore instructed to restructure its relationship with ECS so that Transwestern would have sufficient control over the motor to assume regulatory responsibility for the motor's operation.  Transwestern and ECS signed an Operational Control Agreement obligating Transwestern to assume operational control over the motor with respect to all facilities and activities subject to the Commission's jurisdiction.  DREW -ARE YOU OKAY WITH THIS?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winckowski, Michele
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Taylor, Gina; Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Petersen, Keith; Martens, Donna
Subject:	RE: pipeline project questions

	Gina - Northern never built facilities under the East Leg 2000 Open Season.  Donna Martens should be able to answer the Gallup questions.  Thanks MW

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Gina
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Winckowski, Michele; Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject:	FW: pipeline project questions

Michele,

Can you provide the information requested below on NNG?

Lorraine,

Can you provide the TW information?

Please let me know if you need assistance.

Thanks, Gina

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Haden, Sarah
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Taylor, Gina
Subject:	FW: pipeline project questions

Gina,

Below are Katharine Fraser's questions.  She eventually agreed to reveal them to me! :)  I told her we would get back to her as soon as possible.  However, I just received her e-mail.

Thanks!
Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	katharine_fraser@standardandpoors.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-katharine+5Ffraser+40standardandpoors+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	sarah.haden@enron.com
Subject:	pipeline project questions

Sarah,

As we discussed, Inside FERC has lost track of current information on a couple
of Enron projects for our online Pipeline Tracker service. As you can see below,
the questions are quite basic.

One, Northern Natural East Leg 2000 was scheduled to go into service in Nov.
'99, but at some point had a delay. I'd like to know if and when it went into
service; if it was built under blanket authority or was it certificated*; if it
indeed runs 264 miles from Iowa to Illinois and if so, what is the diameter; how
much did it cost, $300 million?; if it has a postage stamp rate, and if so, what
is it?; who are the shippers?; and with whom does it compete?

* If that's the case, please provide the docket number.

For the other, Transwestern Gallup, I'd like to know if it went into service
Feb. 1, 2000, as planned; how much compression was added at the Bloomfield and
LaPlata "A" stations (or anywhere else for this project); if it added 140,000
Mcf/day, bringing the mainline to 1.09 Bcf/day; if it cost $11.6 million as
projected and if internal funds were used; and what are the rates, which FERC
ordered the company to disclose. We had the shippers listed as follows: Duke
Energy Trading and Marketing LLC, 40,000 Mcf/day; El Paso Energy Marketing Co.,
40,000 Mcf/day; Southern Energy Inc., 25,000 Mcf/day; Sempra Energy Trading
21,500 Mcf/day; Reliant Energy Services Inc., 10,000 Mcf/day and North Star
Steel Co., 3,500 Mcf/day. Is that data still correct and what is the duration of
the deals? Five years? Also, in approving the project, FERC ordered Transwester
to restructure its relationship with Enron Compression Services Co., which was
to be the owner of the project; how was that structured?

Katharine Fraser
Associate Editor
Inside FERC
The McGraw-Hill Cos.
1200 G St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 383-2272
fax (202) 383-2125
katharine_fraser@platts.com


Vin:

The balance in my 401K plan is $547,038 in the Stable Asset Acct.  There is around $200 in ENE and $200 in one of the other funds.  How I got that who know!
Esop is around $105.  The majority has been transferred to my IRA's over the years.
Cash Balance Plan would not allow me access today!  I think it is around $35,000.  I believe Pat should have a copy of my last statement (June 30, 2001)

I hope this is what you were looking for?
	Jim Schwieger


Dr. Bill McMullen called you this morning and said that you had called
the school last week asking for courses that they scheduled for quantitive
analysis.

They gave your name to Dr. McMullen and he would like you to email
him exactly what you are looking for.

His email address is:  mcmullew@tamug.tamu.edu

Thanks!

Shirley


Thanks.

Santiago

Errol McLaughlin
05/03/2001 03:45 PM
To: Santiago Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NYMEX Settles

Santagio,

Attached are the NYMEX settles from Jan '98 forward.

Thanks,

Errol


Are you shittin' me?  Do we do this every quarter?  DF

01/14/2000 05:28 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
01/14/2000 05:28 PM
01/14/2000 05:28 PM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Enron PAC/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Emily
Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Anne
Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amelia
Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Alma
Navarro/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Boycott materials

Please provide to me the materials, if any, described below that may exist in
your organization as soon as you can.

The fourth quarter (1999) report to the Commerce Department in compliance
with the anti-boycott provisions of the Export Administration Act is due by
January 31, 2000.  Please review your fourth quarter files and provide to me,
by January 21, 2000, any language, oral or written, in any communication to
or from any company or person in your area of responsibility during the
fourth quarter which might have been boycott-related.


494842 should be peco

495168  should be 175.00


The following is what I have found at Pebble Beach for the month of March:

Only one weekend is available for both the hotel and golf.  Accommodations at
Inn at Spanish Bay for 4 guests arriving Thursday, March 8, 2001 departing
Sunday, March 11, 2001.  There is a minimum of a two night stay but you can
use any combination within these dates.  Ocean View room rate is
$525.00/person/night.

Golf Availability:
Links at Spanish Bay - Friday, March 9 at 7:20 a.m. - Golf Fee $185.00/pp
includes 2 carts
Pebble Beach Golf Links - Saturday, March 10 at 12:00 p.m. - Golf Fee
$300.00/pp includes 2 carts
Spyglass Hill Golf Course - Sunday, March 11 at 7:30 a.m. - Golf Fee
$225.00/pp includes 2 carts
(Please note:  Only these courses and these tee times are available to play
on these dates.)

If you are not planning to stay on property, tee times can only be reserved
60 days out at The Links at Spanish Bay, 30 days out at Spyglass Hill and one
day in advance at Pebble Beach Golf Links.

Average high temperature in the Monterey area during the month of March is 62
degrees and the average low temperature is 45 degrees.

Attached is some information on the hotel and golf courses as well as driving
times and directions from nearby airports.

The resort will only hold these dates until the end of the week so please let
me know if you would be interested in confirming.  If you choose to look at
alternate dates, I would be happy to check availability for you.
THANKS!!


The following are the liquidations for the transport book that are hitting
the texas desk(a negative is expense that is hitting - need a revenue entry
to clear):
Liq #  Type  Prod Month Amount
N71394.1 Physical 0002  $372,649.99
    0003  $401,449.98
N78544.1 Physical 0002  $372,649.99
    0003  $401,449.98
NA7655.1 Financial 0002  ($344,375)
    0003  ($368,125)
NA7651.1 Financial 0002  ($369,750)
    0003  ($395,250)

Please call with any questions.
PL


Dynegydirect will be unavailable beginning at 5:00pm today for system
maintenance.  We request that you please log out of the system while we are
performing maintenance.  Dynegydirect will be available tomorrow, October
23, during normal business hours starting at 2:00am until 6:30pm. Should
you have questions, please contact eCare at 713.767.5000 or 1.877.396.3493.

Dynegydirect  e-Care
Dynegy Inc.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002

E-mail:
e-care@dynegydirect.com

Phone:
North America 877.396.3493
United Kingdom 0800.169.6591
International  +1.713.767.5000

Fax:
North America 877.396.3492
United Kingdom 0800.169.6615
International  +1.713.388.6002


Steve, apparently I'm developing an overactive imagination when it comes to
FERC decisions.

In Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, 74 FERC ? 61,102, reh'g denied, 75
FERC ? 61,272 (1996), and Transwestern, 90 FERC P 61,044, in which FERC
approved LFT services, the Commission accepted the pipelines' statements that
they would not sell capacity that is not available (i.e., will not
double-sell), rather than limit the service in some way or reject the filings.

In Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., 79 FERC ? 61,394 (1997), the
Commission approved of the pipeline's selling of capacity that becomes
operationally available for various reasons from time to time.

But I have not been able to locate the general statement along the lines of
"pipelines can use their own discretion to determine whether capacity is
available" that I thought existed.


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 07/13/99 03:27
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Sager
07/13/99 02:10 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, jcotner@gibbs-brun.com, sroach@gibbs-brun.com
Subject: NERC Response to TVA letter - First Draft

Attached is a first draft.  It is likely heavy handed but we can chop down
from here (don't want to scare NERC away but need to set the record
straight).


While seemingly small in the scheme of things these days at Enron, on 12/14/01 EPMI did get a FERC win against MISO's proposed $1000 fee for each non-confirmed transmission service request for firm PTP of one week or longer.  FERC used our (In house written) argument almost verbatim!


Many thanks to all for this rapid resolution. It was a little awkward when we
could not tell our new starter what his functional line was!

With thanks

Heidi

	Scott Mills@ECT
	18/11/2000 01:34 AM

		 To: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

I think that it makes perfect sense now that Sydney rolls into London.  Sally
and I have discussed this in the past and she will concur.  Hope all is well!

SRM

HEIDI MASON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/16/2000 07:37 PM
To: Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

I dont know how 'international' the year end review will be. I will contact
Mike Jordan directly and find out specifically who the line should be. I have
discussed it with Mike when I was in London and his only concern was that the
move to London was in line with Sally's understanding and that you and she
was comfortable with it.

 Thanks for your help on this.

With thanks

Heidi

	Scott Mills@ECT
	17/11/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

Since a majority of the activity is power related, I would imagine that
Justin should roll into the overall power group in London.  They may have
other ideas!
The mid-year reviews were localized to Sydney only, will this be different at
year end?

SRM

HEIDI MASON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/16/2000 04:50 PM
To: Scott Mills@ECT
cc: sally.beck@enron.com
Subject: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

Scott

With all our reporting changing to London Office and now it appears some
restructure of risk and the broadening of Sally's role, what are we going to
do for the second report for our new risk manager, Justin Den Hertog - he has
taken over from Alan.

He reports to me locally, but functionally he would traditionally have
reported to you on behalf of Sally's area. I assume this has now moved with
the rest of us and would therefore be either James New or Mike Jordan in
London? Can you please advise me via return email as we are working on our
PEP stuff, reviews etc.

With thanks

Heidi


This one I remember seeing before but I don't remember making an interview
decision one way or the other.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 07:49
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           04/04/2000 10:10 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Recruiting Ops/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Job No. 78728

Mark,
Another resume for your review.  He is not as strong as some of the others,
and the employment history is
a little jumpy in the beginning, but has been more stable the last 5 years.
Let me know what you think.

Nedre
31659
---------------------- Forwarded by Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000
11:05 AM ---------------------------

"Joe Meynier" <jmeynier@ev1.net> on 04/03/2000 07:28:58 PM
Please respond to <jmeynier@ev1.net>
To: <Nedre.Strambler@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Job No. 78728

 - 127.wpd
 - REF.WPD
 - MYRES.WPD


I'm looking for an article that appeared on page 12 of the May 17 issue of
Investment Dealers' Digest entitled "CFTC contacts Blackbird, which reignites
debate."
Mark Taylor
413/1157


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
12:59 PM ---------------------------

"Glover, Rusty" <rglover@halff.com> on 01/19/2001 11:14:32 AM
To: "Beard, Jaime" <JBeard@Halff.com>, "JON CROSS (E-mail)"
<joncross@rlkengineering.com>, "BRAD DAVIS (E-mail)"  <doodoc@hotmail.com>,
"RIDDLE (E-mail)" <clayriddle@yahoo.com>, "KYLE (E-mail)" <KFKU@dynegy.com>,
"JENNIFER (E-mail)"  <JM.GLOVER@MERITENERGY.COM>, "KAK (E-mail)"
<kcameron@yahoo-inc.com>, "SHELLEY (E-mail)" <scameron@yahoo-inc.com>,
"CHERYL (E-mail)"  <ckhalla@swbell.net>, "ROCHELLE (E-mail)"
<rdblue@seark.net>, "CAMILLE (E-mail)" <kcdavis@pdq.net>, "LARRY HANS
(E-mail)"  <hansl92@aol.com>, "Fletcher, Thomas" <TFletcher@Halff.com>,
"Dewey, Daniel" <DDewey@Halff.com>, "Almaguer, Michael"
<MAlmaguer@Halff.com>, "DAREN (E-mail)" <daren.j.farmer@enron.com>, "BRAD
BARNHARDT (E-mail)" <farmer_bernie@hotmail.com>, "ANDREA & MICHAEL (E-mail)"
<mad399@yahoo.com>, "KRISTIN ROAN (E-mail)"  <kroan@lafp.com>, "JOE (E-mail)"
<hockeywinger@earthlink.net>
cc:
Subject: FW: Heavy LOAD

-----Original Message-----
From: John Riggins [mailto:jriggins@hill-wilkinson.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Ryan Smith; Rusty Glover; Plemons Mike; Mike Plemons; Mike Eggleton;
Justin Biggs; Greg Barberee; Eric Fischer; Brady Jones; Archer Brent;
jlriggin@aol.com; Becky Riggins; gdfarley1@aol.com;
cwright3400@yahoo.com
Subject: FW: Heavy LOAD

John Riggins
Project Engineer
Hill & Wilkinson, Ltd.
800 Klein Road
Plano, TX 75074
214.507.1947

-----Original Message-----
From: Swanson Terry [mailto:tswanson@hill-wilkinson.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Everyone
Subject: FW:Heavy LOAD

This is why our superintendents do not drive cars >>>>>>>>>>> one of
them might try this.

?

?
 - HOMEDEPOT1.DOC


call Amanda Huble and she will place you on my calendar

Thanks


asshole

John J Lavorato@ENRON
12/23/2000 10:51 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

john

I cant' seem to make my gambling problem go away.

bills +3 250
denver -7 250
jack +3 1/2 250


Sally,

Congratulations on your promotion. . .it is well deserved!  You have been
such a big influence in my career, and I sincerely appreciate all that you do.

Thanks again,
Carrie
---------------------- Forwarded by Carrie Slagle/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 10:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           01/12/2001
07:31 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Managing Director and Vice President Elections

The Managing Director PRC Committee met this week to elect individuals to
Managing Director and Vice President positions.  These employees are
recognized as outstanding contributors to the organization, whose individual
efforts have been instrumental in the continued success and growth of the
company.  We are pleased to announce the election of the following new
Managing Directors and Vice Presidents.  Please join us in congratulating
these individuals on their new appointments.

Managing Director ) Commercial

Phillip K. Allen, ENA (EWS) West Gas Trading - Houston
Franklin R. Bay, EBS Entertainment on Demand - Houston
Timothy N. Belden, ENA (EWS) ) West Power Trading - Portland
Michael R. Brown, EEL ) Executive - London
Christopher F. Calger, ENA (EWS) West Power Origination - Portland
Joseph M. Deffner, ENA (EWS) Treasury & Funding - Houston
Timothy J. Detmering, ENA (EWS) Corporate Development - Houston
William D. Duran, ENA (EWS) Generation Investments - Houston
Robert S. Gahn, EES Commodity Structuring - Houston
Kevin C. Garland, EBS Broadband Ventures - Houston
Ben F. Glisan, Jr., Corporate ) Global Equity Markets - Houston
Robert E. Hayes, ETS COMM Marketing - Houston
Phillip R. Milnthorp, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination & Trading - Calgary

Managing Director ) Commercial Support

Sally W. Beck, ENW (EWS) Energy Operations Management - Houston
Fernley Dyson, EEL Finance & Support Services - London

Vice President ) Commercial

Gregory Adams, EES MMC Management - Houston
Robert Bayley, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Jack D. Boatman, ETS Market Development ) Houston
Rhenn Cherry, EES Assets/Labor ) Houston
Niamh Clarke, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Peter Crilly, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Derek J. Davies, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Calgary
Mark D. Davis, Jr., ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
Charles Delacey, Corporate Finance ) Houston
Paul Devries, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Toronto
Christopher H. Foster, ENA (EWS) West Power Trading ) Portland
Jeffrey F. Golden, EES Corporate Development ) Houston
Michael D. Grigsby, ENA West Gas Trading Group - Houston
Troy A. Henry, EES Bundled Sales-Heavy Industrial ) Houston
Rogers Herndon, ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
James W. Lewis, EES Underwriting ) Houston
Christopher Mahoney, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Andrew Marsden, EBS Broadband Ventures ) London
John McClain, EBS Broadband Wholesale Origination ) Houston
Kevin J. McGowan, EGM (EWS) American Coal ) Houston
Albert E. McMichael, Jr., ENA (EWS) Gas Commodity Structuring ) Houston
Ermes I. Melinchon, Central America Origination ) Houston
Steven R. Meyers, EES Consumption ) Houston
Lloyd D. Miller, ENA (EWS) Portfolio Management ) Houston
Michael A. Miller, Wind Development / Execution-General Administration )
Houston
Marcello Romano, EBS EEL-Broadband Trading ) London
David A. Samuels, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline - Houston
Per A. Sekse, EGM (EWS) Global Risk Markets ) New York
Edward S. Smida, EBS Video on Demand ) Houston
Mark Tawney, EGM (EWS) Weather Trading ) Houston
Jon Thomsen, EBS Business Development ) Latin America/Canada ) Portland
Barry L. Tycholiz, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination - Houston
Frank W. Vickers, ENA (EWS) East Gas Origination ) Houston
Amit Walia, Corporate, Corporate Development ) Houston
William White, EBS Global Bandwidth Risk Mgmt ) Houston
Jonathan Whitehead, EEL EA Trading ) Japan
Mark Whitt, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination ) Denver
John A. Zufferli, ENA (EWS) Canada Power Trading - Calgary

Vice President ) Commercial Support

Beth Apollo, EEL Financial Operations Executive ) London
Marla Barnard, EBS Human Resources ) Houston
Karen L. Denne, Corporate, Public Relations ) Houston
Georganne M. Hodges, ENA (EWS) Trading, Origination & Power Plant Accounting
) Houston
Phillip Lord, EEL Transaction Support ) London
Peggy Mahoney, EES Marketing ) Communication ) Houston
Steven Montovano, Corporate, Government & Regulatory Affairs ) Dublin
Laura Scott, ENA (EWS) Canada Accounting ) Calgary
Richard C. Sherman, ENA (EWS) Transaction Support ) Houston
Gregory W. Stubblefield, EES Financial Planning & Reporting ) Houston
Dennis D. Vegas, CALME International Public Relations ) Houston

Vice President ) Specialized Technical

Sami Arap Sobrinho, ESA (EWS) Legal ) Houston
Merat Bagha, EBS Sales Engineering ) Houston
Justin Boyd, EEL Legal ) London
Mary Nell Browning, EBS Legal ) London
Jonathan Chapman, EEL Legal ) London
Robert D. Eickenroht, Corporate, Legal ) Houston
Mark Evans, EEL Legal ) London
David Forster, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline ) Houston
Janine Juggins, EEL Tax ) London
Peter C. Keohane, ENA (EWS) Canada Legal ) Calgary
Pinnamaneni V. Krishnarao, ENA (EWS) Research Group ) Houston
Travis C. McCullough, ENA (EWS) Finance Origination, Mergers/Acquisitions )
Houston
Michael Popkin, ESA (EWS) SA- Risk Management/Network Integration ) Houston
Elizabeth A. Sager, ENA (EWS) Physical Trading ) Houston
Richard B. Sanders, ENA (EWS) Litigation ) Houston
John W. Schwartzenburg, EECC Legal ) Houston
Michael D. Smith, EES Legal ) Houston
Marcus Vonbock Und Polach, EEL Legal ) London
Jay C. Webb, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline Systems ) Houston

Vice President ) Technical

Donald R. Hawkins, ETS Quality Management ) Houston
John R. Keller, ETS Engineering & Construction ) Houston


Attached are more permit matrix suggestions (real estate) made available to
Reagan Rorschach on Permitting matters.  Bill Lane of Kilpatrick Stockton
called earlier with Environmental permit input and I passed that input on the
Reagan. I have a good comfort level about the accuracy and depth of the
Permitting/Regulatory Due Diligence effort at this point.

Outstanding Regulatory Items on my "To Do" List are to (i) finalize the EWG
Application and get it filed with the FERC; (ii) inquire about the need for
and mechanics of getting a Power Marketer Certificate for North Carolina
Power Holdings, LLC or for the two LLCs that is acquiring and (iii) receive
feedback from Bracewell and Patterson on Regean's Permit Matrix.

I will be forwarding my comments on the DASH to Dwight by  4:00 p.m. this
afternoon.  I have scheduled a meeting with Mark Haedicke for 10:00 a.m. on
Tuesday, January 9 to review my Risk Memo and the DASH prior to Dave
Delainey's return to Houston.

More Updates later,

Steve

----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001 01:40 PM -----

	"Duncan, Allyson" <ADuncan@KilpatrickStockton.com>
	01/05/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: "'Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com'" <Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com>,
"'Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com'" <Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Permits for Cogentrix Plants; #247747

Comments from the real estate attorney.  Please let me know if you want
clarification of follow up.  None of the things he mentions are of the
shut-down magnitude type, even if you do ultimately need them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Benson, Jeff
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Duncan, Allyson
Subject: RE: Permits for Cogentrix Plants; #247747

Allyson -

Assuming that we're just taking over an existing permitted facility, I do
not think that there are additional necessary real estate permits. There are
a few thoughts that may or may not be applicable, depending on what is
planned at the facility.

- If there is an elevator at the facility, they are permitted by the
Department of Labor.  The client will need to notify the Department of name
change and will then the elevator(s) will be inspected in the normal course
and licensed under our client's name.

- It is my understanding that there will not be construction activities - if
this is incorrect, our client will need (a)land disturbance (also called
grading) permit, (b) building permit. Upon completion, any new construction
would receive certificate of occupancy.

- I don't think they are planning subdivision but any subdivision
contemplated for the property would require applicable city/county
approvals.  The nature of those approvals would depend on the circumstances.

Jeffrey A. Benson
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
3737 Glenwood  Ave., Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27612
Ph: 919-420-1773
Fx: 919-420-1800

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan, Allyson
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Lane, Bill; Benson, Jeff
Subject: FW: Permits for Cogentrix Plants; #247747

Could you please take a look at the attached matrix and see if you can think
of any other licenses and permits that could arisse that would shut down
this facililty?  As usual with things involving Enron, they want it right
away.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com [mailto:Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 4:52 PM
To: aduncan@kilstock.com; blane@kilstock.com; cthompson@bracepatt.com
Cc: Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com; Dwight.Beach@enron.com
Subject: Permits for Cogentrix Plants

Allyson, Bill and Clark:

Following up on my e:mail to Allyson of yesterday, I am forwarding a more
complete permit listing prepared by Reagan Rorchach of Enron's Power
Development Group.  I would appreciate your reviewing the attached with an
eye toward any customary permits that appear to missing.

Please give me a call as soon as possible.

I plan to meet with Reagan tomorrow morning on this work product.

Thanks,

Steve

----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 03:12 PM -----

                    Reagan

                    Rorschach@ENR        To:     Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn
                    ON                   Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
                                         Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    01/04/2001           cc:

                    03:01 PM             Subject:     Permit Issues

Attached is the most recent permit matrix (see the second tab of the
spreadsheet).  I still have some outstanding issues as some phone calls
have not been returned.  I expect those to be resolved tommorrow.  If you
can think of anything else, please let me know, and I'll take care of it.

Issues requiring action are bolded in red in the spreadsheet.  Brief
summary--

   I cannot find record of a stormwater permit for the coal handling
   facility.  I think they need one, Dave K.??
   I need to know how tall the stacks are at each plant.  If they are under
   200 feet, they may not be regulated.  However, we should examine the FAA
   notifying criteria (height and location) to evaluate compliance.
   Are there any antennae or transmitters on the stacks?  FCC permits will
   be involved (or need to be) if they do.
   Is the coal handling facility in the Lumberton city limits?  I am
   getting conflicting reports on this from the locals.

Lastly, I have not asked for written confirmation for any of the
information gathered so far.  If we need it; however, I can get it.

Please review and comment.

Thanks,

Reagan Rorschach
x5.3363

(See attached file: Alamac Permit Matrix.xls)


I have no seat for him until Feb 15th when Palmer leaves.  I will see what I
can find out in terms of Kam moving.
PL


Mason

Did Rob make a price on the ANP. If not can we finalilze a price on this toll and give John Llodra a call.

Harry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamlin, Mason
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:01 PM
To:	Stalford, Robert; Arora, Harry
Subject:	RE: ANP Pricing Summary

Attached are the vol curves we are using.  Please look over them and let me know if you would like to change them.

Thanks,

MRH

 << File: Vol Curve Info.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stalford, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Hamlin, Mason
Subject:	RE: ANP Pricing Summary

Mason,

Harry would like to see the individual gas vols, power vols, and correlations used in your calc. Thanks.

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamlin, Mason
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert; Davis, Mark Dana
Cc:	Llodra, John; Herrera, Fernando
Subject:	ANP Pricing Summary

Please review the attached update.

Thanks,

MRH

   << File: ANP summary 011022.xls >>


Ed and Mark,

As we discussed, I spoke to Jeff Hodge and Travis McCullough about the best
way to document this deal.  We all agreed that it is better to document the
deal as a deferred payment on the sale of natural gas rather than as a loan.
Documenting the deal as a loan does not add any protection for Enron and in
fact, may be detrimental because of the various laws concerning loans and
lenders.  The protections  and remedies afforded by the Master track those
that Enron would have under a loan document.  Enron would be in no better
position to collect from NUI in the event of bankruptcy under a loan document
than under the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.  Additionally, I assume
that NUI, being a regulated utility, will not want to or be able to document
this deal as a loan.

Please let me know if you need additional information on this topic.

Stacy


Jay,

I need to compile a report that shows transaction volume by basis location(Basis Swaps) and volume by location for Phys Forwards as well as Finc Swaps for Power.

We have given them a list of the locations at which we like to make markets.  They want to see historical volumes at those location to judge the liquidity at each location.

You can reach me at 713-515-3949 or x37041.

Thanks for your help.

Phillip


Forwarded at the request of Joe Hillings:

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/06/99
10:15 AM ---------------------------

"Linda Schmid" <schmid@uscsi.org> on 12/03/99 12:41:00 PM
To: Undisclosed.Recipients@smtp-gw.vma.verio.net
cc:  (bcc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron)

Subject: Aaron letter change

Dear Transborder Data Flow Working Group:

A significant change has been made to the letter to Aaron.  The following
two paragraphs have been rewritten to achieve recognition of the adequacy of
the existing federal and state legislative framework.  Under the procedures
of the Directive, the Commission will have to make a determination of
adequacy, thus, the rewrite to soften the suggestion of how they make that
affirmative determination.

Article 25 of the EU Directive calls for "adequate," not "equivalent"
protection, and the Financial Services Modernization Act, added to the
existing federal and state legislative framework, establishes a high and
enforceable standard for notice, choice, access, and security of consumer
information. This comprehensive legislative framework achieves equivalency
to the Data Protection Directive in protecting customer information covered
by Title V of the FCRA.

Over the next 18 months, the European Commission should follow the process
of rulemaking and implementation of the Act during the Safe Harbor
transition, in order to make a subsequent determination of adequacy based on
how the Act is interpreted and applied.  In the short-term the Commission
should conclude that the federal and state financial services regulators,
with their new statutory privacy mandate, can serve as the independent
enforcement bodies for those financial services companies that choose to
certify under the Safe Harbor.

Please let me know if you object to this change.  The comments are due
today.

Sincerely,

Linda Schmid
Director Electronic Commerce
Coalition of Service Industries
805 15th Street NW, Suite 1110
Washington D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 289-7460
Fax: (202) 775-1726
Email: schmid@uscsi.org

************************************************************************
Visit http://www.WorldServicesCongress.com to view industry resolutions for
the WTO Services 2000 Negotiations.
************************************************************************

 - CSI draft letter to Aaron 11_ 19.doc


==================================================
NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS:
Due to the shutdowns on Capitol Hill, all access restrictions for
NationalJournal.com have been lifted. No password or "I.P. recognition" is
required to access Technology Daily or the rest of the site.
==================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY AM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MORNING HIGHLIGHTS:

INTERNET ACCESS: Schools and libraries faced a Sunday deadline for blocking
access to online pornography.

TELECOM: The FCC will consider a proposal to allow some carriers to license
larger chunks of wireless spectrum.

TRADE: The AFL-CIO launched an ad campaign against trade-negotiating
authority.

LABOR: The Labor Department decided against pursuing AOL for using volunteers.

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- OPENING ARGUMENT: Why The Terrorism Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/openingargument.htm

-- BILL STATUS: The Latest Updates On Key Legislation
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/bills/billprogress.htm

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Per our discussion a few months ago, would you please send us the morning report in excel format so we can extract the data for our studies and graphs?  The last time the morning report was modified, I believe that one of the to-do's on your side was to provide this.

Thanks.  Call if you have questions.  x7707.


thanks. sheila

From: Sara Shackleton on 03/27/2001 06:59 PM CST
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Wednesday, March 28 is the target execution date for the ECI customer
agreement and assignment (from ENA) of the Securities Loan Agreement/credit
book.  I am not certain if Cheryl was able to expedite delivery of the new
ENE guaranty.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Sheila Glover
	03/27/2001 02:10 AM

		 To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Tom,
The day i received this I responded to Sara and cc'd richard that I was okay
with transferring the Stock Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI.  The ENA was
executed and the ECI piece is what is in process.

Sara,
Any update?  How far are we away from exectution?  Do you need anything from
anyone?

Thanks. Sheila

Tom Doukas@ENRON
03/26/2001 11:59 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate@ECT,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Just wanted to follow up to see if we have a time frame as to when the letter
will be fully executed.

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 03/22/2001 08:41 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Here's a recap for everyone.
Our original negotiation with Bear (for the Securities Loan Agreement) was in
the name of ENA, and, ENA had an existing account agreement with Bear.
However, Bear insisted that the account agreement was "too old" and that we
negotiate a new agreement.  I agreed on the condition that this not hold up
execution of the Securities Loan Agreement.  We have one or two final points
remaining on the new account agreement which we'll execute for both ENA and
Enron Credit Inc.. ("ECI").  We have the authorized trader list for ECI and
are waiting for Richard to designate the new officer/director slate but we
are prepared for execution by the existing officers in London.  The
assignment instrument will be very short for transferring the ECI book from
ENA to ECI.  It will take only a few days to replace the existing ENE
guaranty for the Securities Loan Agreement.

Jeff and Sheila:  Please verify that both ENA and ECI do not  need the
Securities Loan Agreement.  I believe it is just ECI and we can transfer the
existing agreement to ECI.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	03/21/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: BEAR Guarantee letter

Sara,

I just spoke with Russ Miron from Bear Sterans regarding our Guaranty to
Reduce funding to 20% per side.

I had asked him about when they will be executing the agreement.  He said
that his lawyers are ready to sign but are under the impression that you have
one remaining point to resolve and that this point is holding up the
finalization of the agreement.

Is there an issue from our side?  If not we should be able to get this
execution taken care of immediately?

Thanks,

Tom
713-853-9074


Hi Mark,

I wanted to keep you more informed on the various things I am working on and
my progress and meant to copy you on the last email.  Also, I am preparing a
memo/report on the deals I have completed with GSS and will copy you on the
report.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001 12:43 PM -----

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	04/12/2001 12:42 PM

		 To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT, Selena Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cassandra Schultz/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Nordstrom/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Updated Brokerage Agreement Status

Attached please find the most recent Brokerage Agreement Status Report.   The
Agreements executed or prepared for execution within the past two weeks
include:

Bear Stearns/ECI
Goldman Sachs International/ECT
Sanford Bernstein/ENA
Merrill Lynch/ENA
Deutsche Bank (Frost)/ ENA and ECT
Sanford Bernstein/ENA & ECT (electronic)
Salomon Smith Barney/ENA & ECT (electronic)
Bear Stearns/ENA & ECT (electronic)

 If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001 12:29 PM -----

	Keegan Farrell
	04/12/2001 12:18 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Brokerage Agreement Status

Here is the document you have requested.  Thanks,

Keegan


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2000 08:57 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
02/29/2000 06:02 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 2/29

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/29/00.

Regards
Molly