-----Original Message-----
From: Frei, Laura (ISC at Alcoa)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Kirk Becker'; Velez, Lori (ISC @ Alcoa); Smith, Charles; Jimenez,
Vincent E. (ISC at Alcoa)
Subject: FW: Lets go camping in South America

-----Original Message-----
From: Martha Alexander [mailto:Martha.Alexander@tyc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:37 AM
To: 'Milton.Frei@alcoa.com'; 'Laura.Frei@alcoa.com';
'Carl.Alexander@alcoa.com'
Subject: FW: Lets go camping in South America

> ----------
> From:  Marilyn Alexander
> Sent:  Monday, April 09, 2001 9:28 AM
> To:  Gloria Ray; Maria Rangel; Sarita Kovar; Jeanette McKinney; Sandy
> Brown; Lester Ward; Herbert Wade; Brenda Medack; Silas Waldrup; Juanita
> Sheppard; Martha Alexander; Glenda Mach; Ramon Campos; Josie Lehmann;
> Carolyn F. Webb (Giddings); Dennis Smith; Patricia Hoffman; Paul Drosche;
> Elizabeth Ramos
> Subject:  FW: Lets go camping in South America
>
>
>
> ----------
> From:  Tim Falke
> Sent:  Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:10 AM
> To:  Roy Marshall; Dennis Smith; Forrest Gunter; Janis Stevens; Lawrence
> Perkins; Marilyn Alexander
> Subject:  FW: Lets go camping in South America
>
>
>
> ----------
> From:  Nancy Zgabay
> Sent:  Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:55 AM
> To:  'Stephen Zgabay'; 'Keith @ work'; Tim Falke
> Subject:  FW: Lets go camping in South America
>
> This is awful!
>
> ----------
> From:  Gerald Pohlmeyer[SMTP:GPOHLME@dot.state.tx.us]
> Sent:  Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:14 PM
> To:  Nancy Zgabay
> Subject:  Lets go camping in South America
>
>  <<Amazon_.doc>>
> See attached!!!!!!!!!
> Open in Word!
>
>
>
>
>

 - Amazon_.doc


Hey buddy.  We are having all sorts of problems with St 30, 90% internal.
You should try to sell to someone else if possible.  Maybe Williams??


Dear Vincent,  The Washington bureau will have a full plate when we return from Thanksgiving break.  Congress returns with many lawmakers urging action on energy legislation before the end of the year.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says there's a long list of legislation ahead of energy in the Democrat-controlled Senate, but Republicans are threatening to force a vote through a filibuster.  In turn, Democrats are saying they'll filibuster any energy bill containing a provision to open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.  The legislation battle continues next week.   Peter also says the Washington bureau will continue to follow the FERC's major decisions regarding how it assesses market power.  The Commission announced a major change this week that will impact many of the large and small utilities across the country.   Also next week, we'll see what Energy Daily Publisher Llewellyn King has to say about Pat Wood's performance as Chairman of the FERC.  And rumors are flying about DOE Secretary Spencer Abraham - on Monday, King talks about the whispers he's hearing in Washington.   ENL's Gale Smith will have a report from the Houston bureau next week on a Louisiana company that uses rice hulls to create power.  Agrilectric Incorporated consumes some of this power, but most of the electricity is sold to an area utility company.  We'll have details next week.   Also, Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante will bring us coverage from the Alaska Resources Conference taking place next Thursday and Friday.  We'll also bring you details on the final report regarding the chosen route of the Arctic natural gas pipeline.  The report is due to Alaska's Governor on November 30.   We'll hear from Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies Executive Director John White next week.  ENL's Kym McNicholas will speak with White about his organization's opposition to the state's long-term power contracts.  Catch White from the West Coast bureau next week.   Closing Prices for Nov. 21, 2001:   Crude: $18.96       Unleaded: $0.5273   Heating Oil: $0.5342   Natural Gas: $2.813    Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events. Have a great Thanksgiving break!  We'll see you on Monday.   Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  Real Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


We have length again in NP (on-peak) for 04/24/01 and EES long/short in SDG1
to take care of as well.  There is 25 mws of ST-WBOM length at $266 in
NP-15...there is also 50 mws of ST-Cali length(50/50 over $266) in NP-15.
EES2 is alternatively long off-peak and short on-peak in SDG1.  Enpower deals
need to be made under the appropriate books in NP (buy from imbalance/sell to
?...) and with a $5 spread as normal for EES.  If you have questions, please
let me know.

Thank you,

Bill


SUB's data responses to PS-SP:001 - 004, along with attachments, are below.
Due to problems with the Discovery page these responses are e-mailed.  It is
SUB's understanding that PS-SP:001 - 004 are the only data requests from
Puget Sound to Springfield.  Hard copies are being mailed to Mr. Marshall
and the Hearing Clerk.

 <<Data Response PS_SP_001.doc>>  <<Data Response PS_SP_002.doc>>  <<Data
Response PS_SP_003.doc>>  <<Data Response PS_SP_004.doc>>  <<IOU04.xls>>
<<Aluminum Study Summary.pdf>>

> request_number:  PS-SP:001-004
> firstname:  Steven
> lastname:  Marshall
> e-mail:  marss@perkinscoie.com
> directed_to:  Peter Mershereau
> 1600 Benj. Franklin Plaza
> One SW Columbia Street
> Portland, Oregon  97201
> exhibit_wp-02-e-:  SP-02
> page_numbers:  Pages 4, 9 and Table 4
> request_text:  PS-SP:001:  Page 4, Line 22:  Please provide the basis for
> the use of 7,000 as the number of DSI jobs in the region.  Please provide
> all information available to you on the number of DSI jobs in the region,
> including, if available, the number of jobs by facility, company,
> location, and/or state.  Also include this information for each month or
> year for as many years as available, including forecast data.
>
> PS-SP:002:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the information included in
> Table 4 by company.
>
> PS-SP:003:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the information included in
> Table 4 using the IOU rate testimony, which BPA suggests, would result in
> much higher exchange benefits.
>
> PS-SP:004:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the entire basis for the data
> shown in the table.
>
>
> contact_name:  Steven C. Marshall
> contact_address:  Perkins Coie
> One Bellevue Center, Suite 1800
> 411 - 108th Avenue N.E.
> Bellevue, Washington  98004
> contact_phone:  425-453-7314
> contact_email:  marss@perkinscoie.com
> contact_fax:  425-453-7350
> delivery_instructions:  Please mail hard copies of data responses to Steve
> Marshall.
>

 - Data Response PS_SP_001.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_002.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_003.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_004.doc
 - IOU04.xls
 - Aluminum Study Summary.pdf


Very efficient CC gas units in Entergy and ERCOT are setting price.  Midwest and Plains has gas setting price 4-6 hours per day and coal the remaining 10 hours.   The NE markets (NY and NEPOOL) are the only markets with 10,000 HR gas units setting price across the entire peak.

Keep in mind that current temps are truly "no load" temps for East power (no heating or cooling demand).   The addition of new combined cycle units in our market have been destructive to forward heat rates.

Later.

-----Original Message-----
From: Belden, Tim
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: FW: Power Indices

what fuel is on the margin in your markets that are printing in the $20's?
 -----Original Message-----
From: IntercontinentalExchange [mailto:feedback@intcx.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:55 AM
To: powerindex@list.intcx.com
Subject: Power Indices

IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin

For Power Delivered on Tuesday, November 06, 2001
(Trade Date of Monday, November 05, 2001)

Click here to access index history <http://www.intcx.com/SubscriberServlet/subscriberservlet.class?operation=powerIndexForm&hub=All>.

* volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	 High	 Low	 Wtd Avg Index	 Change ($)	 Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	 $24.85	 $22.00	 $23.40	 - 1.63	 88,800
Comed	 $21.25	 $21.00	 $21.08	 - 1.80	 2,400
Entergy	 $28.50	 $23.45	 $25.41	 - .48	 18,400
Nepool	 $36.75	 $35.25	 $35.77	 - 3.24	 7,200
Palo Verde	 $34.50	 $29.05	 $31.56	 - 1.77	 4,000
PJM-West	 $25.40	 $24.15	 $24.64	 - .01	 88,800
SP-15	 $35.00	 $30.00	 $32.24	 - .97	 5,600
TVA	 $24.10	 $22.75	 $23.73	 - 2.13	 27,200

Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.   Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com <mailto:sales@intcx.com>.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe <http://www.intcx.com/subscribe.html>.

?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Interview ( Jennife Sepeda) "Admin. Position" Conf. Rm. Eb3127

Date:		12/14/2000
Time:		3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


Carlos Sole will be working on it, so I'll let him answer the timing issue.

Kay

	From:  Mathew Gimble @ ECT                           04/17/2001 02:50 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: LOI for Seminole Indians

Kay,

As you and I discussed last week, Enron has met with the Seminole Indian
Tribe ("SIT") and would like to put together an LOI to further proceed with
discussions.  Although we might discuss several deal options, currently, we
are focusing on two different projects (we might want two separate LOIs, let
me know what you have done in the past).  The LOIs need to contain language
that covers the following points:

One project consists of a 500MW, natural gas, combined-cycle facility located
on land owned by SIT in Hollywood, FL
One project consists of a 4x500MW coal or natural gas, combined-cycle
facility located on SIT's Brighton Reservation
Confidentiality language needs to be included (similar to what would be
included in a Confidentiality Agreement)
Exclusivity and reciprocity language also needs to be included, as well as
any non-circumvention language
Twelve month term (at least six months if twelve is obtainable; what was your
experience with the Navahos?)

If I have left anything out or made any legal fauz pas, let me know as soon
as you are able (I'm sure that Bruce and David will do the same).  We told
SIT last week that we would get them something the first part of this week,
so let me know if you see any delay.

My extension is 3-3526 and my cell is (713) 594-0439.

Thanks,
Mathew


I forwarded your request to Luchas Johnson.  He runs the G-Daily-Est book.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
11:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           12/08/2000 10:56 AM

To: Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: G-Daily-Est deals that need to be fixed

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
12/08/2000 10:46 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: G-Daily-Est deals that need to be fixed

Hi again Darron

Here are some more deals that need to be flipped out of the G-DAILY-EST book,

QC3611.1
QC4110.1
QC4394.1
QC4496.1
QC4506.1

Can you please also go through this book to see if there are any more deals
between ECC and another counterparty.  These need to be fixed right away this
morning as I need to invoice and settle them today.  Please call me if you
aren't the person who handles this book, and please forward this message on
to the person who does.

Thanks for your help
Stacey


----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/25/2001 10:49 AM -----

	"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <ENRONPR@bloomberg.net>
	01/25/2001 08:51 AM

		 To: sharonda.stephens@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (BN  ) Colombia's Medellin Utility Drops Isagen Investment,

    enron story

Colombia's Medellin Utility Drops Isagen Investment, Papers Say
1/25/1 8:49 (New York)

     Bogota, Jan. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Colombia's largest municipal
utility, Empresas Publicas de Medellin, won't seek to buy a stake
in state-run generator Isagen because leftist guerrilla attacks on
the power grid have increased its costs, newspapers said.
     The newly sworn in mayor of Medellin, Luis Perez, told a
Senate hearing that the country's third largest city would instead
seek to invest the estimated $400 million the purchase would have
cost into programs to generate jobs in Medellin, the daily El
Tiempo reported.
     ``There is no sense in crying over spilled milk,'' Mines and
Energy Minister Carlos Caballero was quoted by El Tiempo as saying
upon hearing the news.
     The government last year pushed back until 2001 its plans to
sell the state's 77 percent stake in Isagen due to a series of
lawsuits filed by EPM, as the Medellin utility is called. EPM
alleged it had been discriminated against in the sales process
because of anti-monopoly regulations.
     EPM was planning to purchase the government's stake in Isagen
together with Enron Corp. of the U.S. to avoid the anti-monopoly
regulations. AES Corp. of the U.S. and Union Fenosa of Spain were
also interested in Isagen, Caballero said last year.

--Robert Willis in Bogota (571)317-4000 bwillis@bloomberg.net or
through the New York newsroom at (212) 318-2300/jrk

Story illustration: To graph real year-on-year percentage change
in Colombian economic growth, type  {COGCRYOY <Index> GP <GO>} ;

Regional news:               News by category:
NI COLOM   Colombia          NI EM       Emerging markets
NI LATAM   Latin America     NI ECO      Economic news
NI ANREGION                  NI COECO    Colombia economy
NI US                        NI GOV      Government
NI SPAIN                     NI NRG      Energy
                             NI UTI      Utilities
                             NI PZN      Privatizations
                             NI TLS
                             NI MNG
                             NI COS

Company news:
ENE US <Equity>    Enron
AES US <Equity>    AES
1032Z CB <Equity>  EPM
UNF SM <Equity>    Union Fenosa

-0- (BN ) Jan/25/2001 13:49 GMT


<! >
<! >
<! ATTENTION!>
<! You are reading this message because your mail reader cannot display HTML.>
<! If you would prefer to receive text messages from now on,>
<! click the link below or copy it into a web browser.>
<!
http://208.50.155.100/ClickAction?func=S_TurnOffHtml&partname=jjill&uid=81149427
>
<! >

<TITLE>Sp1 D1 02 email</TITLE>

      Click here to forward this message to a friend!

      Click here to change or remove your subscription.


Thank you for choosing Time Warner Road Runner as your high speed online
provider.  Your request has been received and it is currently being processed.
A customer service professional will be in contact with you within 48 hours.
While you wait, here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions.

Q. If I am already a Road Runner customer what will happen to my account?

A. Your account will be transitioned to the new Enron billing system.  This
process is transparent to the end user.  The difference will be seen in your
monthly bill.  Keep in mind that there may still be prorated amount due on the
previous billing method.  Also, an account that is currently delinquent cannot
be transferred until the previous balance is paid in full.

Q. I?m not currently a Road Runner customer.  What is the process?

A. Your address will be checked to verify Road Runner serviceability.  If
serviceable, a customer service professional will contact you to set up an
appointment for a new install.  There are typically two time slot options a
customer may choose, 8am ? 12 noon or 1pm ? 5pm.

Q. Are there any installation charges?

A. All Enron customers will be charged a fee of $39.95 for a standard install
(network interface card not included).  Keep in mind that if you are getting
your computer through the Click at Home project, a network interface card is
already included.  A standard install is one that only required the installer
to
run the cable to an outside wall.  There are extra fees for a network
interface
card and running the cable between an inside wall.


_________________________________________________________________

                   I N V E S T I N G  B A S I C S
                     Wednesday, October 18, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159941
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: American Express
 American Express has "some of the deepest financial planning
 tools of all the online brokerages" -Gomez Advisors,
 Internet Broker Scorecard. Invest with a brand you know and
 trust!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159942

ASK THE FOOL

-- Q. I've just learned that Levi Strauss is a private company,
so I can't buy shares of it. What other major companies are
privately held?

-- A. Take a gander at these biggies: Cargill, Mars, Bertelsmann
AG, Bechtel, Publix Supermarkets, IKEA International, Amway,
Penske, S.C. Johnson & Sons, Montgomery Ward Holding Co.,
Packard Bell NEC, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Hallmark Cards, Borden,
McCain Foods, Hyatt, Hechinger and Domino's Pizza. Some of these
firms offer shares to employees, but individual investors are
out of luck.

-- Q. I've noticed that stocks jump in price when they're added
to the S&P 500 Index. Why is this, and is there any way to learn
which companies will be added in the future?

-- A. You've noticed correctly. When it was announced recently
that America Online would be added to the S&P 500, its shares
quickly rose about 12 percent.

Stocks get added to these indexes to replace ones deemed no
longer worthy of being included, or ones that have merged with
other companies and therefore disappear. The announcements draw
the attention of investors, sending share prices up. And once
the companies are added, index funds that will have to own these
stocks begin snapping up shares.

Unfortunately, the stocks begin moving as soon as the
announcements are made, before they're even officially added. So
there's little time to sneak in and benefit. But if you've
invested in high-quality, growing companies, chances are you may
eventually see some of them added to important indexes.

Got some questions of your own for the Fool? Head to our Help
area or post your question on the Ask a Foolish Question
discussion board.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159943
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159944

_________________________________________________________________

INVESTING BASICS - STOCK SPLITS

Wondering whether to buy a stock before or after a split is like
asking, "Should I eat this peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwich
before or after Mom cuts it in half?

Stocks don't become more inexpensive when they split. True, you
get more shares. But each is worth less. Imagine you own 100
shares of Sisyphus Transport Corp. (ticker: UPDWN). They're
trading at $60 each and total $6,000. When Sisyphus splits
2-for-1, you'll own 200 shares, worth about $30 each. Total
value: (drum roll, please) $6,000. Yawn.

Some people drool over stocks about to split, thinking the price
will surge. Stock prices sometimes do pop a little on news of
splits. But these are artificial moves, sustainable only if the
businesses grow to justify them. The real reason to smile at a
split announcement is because it signals that management is
bullish. They're not likely to split their stock if they expect
the price to go down.

Splits come in many varieties, such as 3-for-2 or 4-for-1.
There's even a "reverse split," when you end up with fewer
shares, with each worth more. Reverse splits are usually
employed by companies in trouble, to avoid looking like the
penny stocks they are. If a stock is trading at a
red-flag-raising $2 per share and it does a reverse 1-for-10
split, the price will rise to $20 and those who held 100 shares
will then own 10.

Companies often split their stock so that the price will remain
psychologically appealing. Sometimes, not splitting would mean
that few people could afford even a single share. If Microsoft
hadn't split seven times in the last decade, each share would be
worth more than $6,500.

With stocks, just as with any purchase, examine what you're
getting for the price. Study the company and compare the stock
price to other numbers, such as earnings. A low price might be
inviting, but a $200 stock can be much more of a bargain than a
$20 one. If your funds are limited, you can just buy fewer
shares.

It's always fun to suddenly own more shares, but splits are like
getting change for a dollar. They're not cause for celebration.
_________________________________________________________________

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

-- If you'd like to learn more about various indexes such as the
S&P 500 (and what companies are in them), pop over to our
collection of index resources.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159945

-- Do your friends and relatives (and us) a favor -- introduce
them to the Fool. If you take a little time to help someone you
care about get on the path toward financial independence, you'll
be giving them an enormous gift. Even if you leave Fool.com out
of it, do spend some time with people, talking finances. There
are few greater gifts you can give someone than a nudge toward
financial independence.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159946

-- If you've got knowledge to share, you could make a few
dollars for it at Soapbox.com. Consider dropping by Soapbox (a
Motley Fool company) to see what other authors are offering.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159947
_________________________________________________________________

A NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR(

I hope you're finding this product useful. The content
originally appeared as part of our nationally syndicated
newspaper feature (which I also prepare). Consider giving your
local editor a jingle and suggesting that they think about
carrying the Fool.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159948

Selena Maranjian
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159949

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159950
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159951
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159952
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159953
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159954

 Sponsored By: American Express
 American Express has "some of the deepest financial planning
 tools of all the online brokerages" -Gomez Advisors,
 Internet Broker Scorecard. Invest with a brand you know and
 trust!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159955

THE SECRET TO A COMFORTABLE RETIREMENT...
 ...is smart planning. Start now with the Motley Fool's
 Roadmap to Retirement online seminar.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159956

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159957

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159958
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-18262-B10182547Address.msg-20:34:10(10-18-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Please reflect in Lotus Notes and follow up.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 03:32 PM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	02/07/2001 03:10 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Top 10 Additions

Dynegy Canada, Inc.
Cleco Marketing & Trading LLC
XL Trading Partners Ltd

There are a couple more worksheets coming in the next few days that we will
probably want to prioritize as well.

Thanks.


February 22, 2002    Dear Flycheap.com Member:    You are receiving this email because you are a registered user of Flycheap.com and have indicated that you would like to receive travel specials from us.    Here's what you'll find in today's Flycheap newsletter . . .     - Great Airfares from $102 Roundtrip    - Top 3 Cruise Deals - as low as $249    - Vacation Rentals - 7 Nt Key Largo from $365 per person    - Reserve your Hotel Room online and Save!  For more information, please visit www.flycheap.com

		  CHECK OUT THESE GREAT AIRFARES
		These roundtrip airfares found on FlyCheap.com include all taxes and surcharges.
	 Phoenix to Las Vegas  San Francisco to Los Angeles  Raleigh Durham to Ft Lauderdale  Kansas City to New Orleans  Pittsburgh to Atlanta  Detroit to Omaha  Hartford to Orlando  New York to West Palm Beach  San Diego to Albuquerque  Salt Lake City to Seattle  Washington DC to Dallas  Charlotte to Tampa  Chicago to Las Vegas  Cincinnati to Houston  	 $102   $124   $150   $155   $172   $179   $190   $192   $197   $203   $204   $211   $222   $239
		Fares available from where you live to everywhere you want to go.   Call 1-800-FLY CHEAP or visit www.flycheap.com    Remember to Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

		  TOP 3 CRUISE DEALS
		1.  Caribbean - 7 Nt Grand Princess - from $599 with $99 upgrades!    2.  Bahamas - 3 Nights on Carnival - from only $249   3.  Alaska Cruisetour - 10 Nights on the Ocean Princess - from $1299     For other hot cruise deals, visit  www.mytravel.com

		  VACATION RENTAL SPECIAL
		Key Largo, FL - 7 night stay from just $365* per person   Everything you could want for a perfect Florida vacation-tropical elegance, luxurious suites and a myriad of activities await you at Ocean Pointe Suites.   From just $1459 total cost including taxes for a 1-bedroom condo  *Per person pricing based upon quad occupancy  Click here for more details

		  RESERVE YOUR HOTEL ROOM ONLINE
		Now that you've booked your flights, search for hotels on Flycheap.com's sister site, MyTravel.com. On the MyTravel.com Hotel Search Engine you can reserve online at one of our 53,000 hotels, resorts and inns. It is safe and secure and you'll find some of the best Hotel Rates in the industry.   Click here to reserve your room online

		This email is free service of Flycheap.com and MyTravel USA.   For more information, please visit:  www.flycheap.com         You received this mailing at this address:  sscott5@enron.com   To automatically unsubscribe from Flycheap.com mailings,  please click here      Flycheap.com is part of the MyTravel Group.  Click here  for details.

		Disclaimer: Roundtrip fares require 14-day advance purchase, Saturday night stay, and Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday travel only.  Quoted fares valid 3/12/02 - 4/4/02 and must be ticketed by 2/25/02.  Domestic fares include all taxes and fees.  Fares non-refundable and may not be available on all flights.    Top 3 Cruise Disclaimer: All rates are per person, double occupancy, cruise only, do not include airfare, and include port charges unless otherwise indicated above. Government fees and taxes are additional. All rates are subject to availability and may go up, sell out, or be withdrawn by the cruise line at any time.   Disclaimer for Vacation Rentals: Rates shown are per unit for the specific time period listed and include applicable taxes. Guests may not exceed maximum occupancy for specific unit purchased. Rates may sell out at any time. Additional dates and unit sizes are listed on the website.     FL Seller of Travel Reg. No. ST-33310 CST# 2043440-40 IA SOT 645  Copyright ? 2002, MyTravel USA


Jinsung:
These need to be posted in DB!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

Jonathan Hoff
10/30/2000 05:12 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 O&M Preliminary Budgets

---------------------- Forwarded by Jonathan Hoff/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 05:12
PM ---------------------------

Jonathan Hoff
10/30/2000 05:06 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 O&M Preliminary Budgets


just faxed it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Tambornino [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Yesterday's Class

It's not on Izio, so if you could fax it, that would
be super.  My fax here at work is 925-933-4150.  Many
thanks

JT

--- "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> wrote:
> Yes.  And she handed out last time's mid-term.  It
> was take home at that
> time, though.  It's open book; we have the whole
> time, but she said it
> should take about 90 minutes (which means that it
> will take me the whole
> time).  You want me to fax it to you?  Check the
> website first. It may
> be posted there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Tambornino
> [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:43 PM
> To: Dasovich, Jeff
> Subject: Yesterday's Class
>
>
> Hey Jeff,
>
> I had to miss last night's class, as you may have
> noticed.  Were there any notes, handouts, sample
> questions, etc for next week's exam?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JT
>
> =====
> Joseph Tambornino
> Vice President
> Hall Equities Group
> (925) 933-4000
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
> on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or otherwise. Thank you.
>
**********************************************************************

=====
Joseph Tambornino
Vice President
Hall Equities Group
(925) 933-4000

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Ashley,

Another professor I contacted. His web page is
http://are.Berkeley.EDU/~rausser/
Can we firm up the trip date? I shall be able to line up some meetings

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000
01:46 PM ---------------------------

vkamins@ect.enron.com on 08/11/2000 01:44:52 PM
To: rausser@are.berkeley.edu, vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Recruiting

Gordon,

This is the information about our recruiting program.

Vince

 - enron1.pdf


great, Andrea, shall we discuss rollout asap?  Thanks!!  Michelle

Brian Schaffer@ENRON
09/18/2000 09:55 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Revised Data Protection Policy

I'm comfortable with this approach.

Michelle Cash@ECT
09/18/2000 01:13 AM
To: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Revised Data Protection Policy

Andrea,

I don't think we need a certification.  I suggest an email mailout, with the
policy residing on the hr web site.  It would be a good idea to place a link
to the policy on all pages that involve HR data, such as PEP, comp data base,
SAP HR, etc.

Brian, what do you think?

Michelle

Andrea Yowman@ENRON
09/17/2000 04:21 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Revised Data Protection Policy

Do you need any type of certification that the employee has read and accepts
like the "Certificate of Compliance"?  Can we put it on the front page of
ehronline and HROL?  Should this just be an email mailout?  Should this
reside on the hrwebsite?

Michelle Cash@ECT
09/15/2000 03:08 PM
To: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Revised Data Protection Policy

Andrea,

Brian and I were talking about the dissemination of this policy.  It seems as
if it should come from your group and go out globally.  What do you think?

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 03:08
PM ---------------------------

Michelle Cash
09/06/2000 11:43 AM
Sent by: Twanda Sweet
To: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Holsworth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Noel
Higgason/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary P
Smith/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad
Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Revised Data Protection Policy

Attached is a revised draft of the Employee Data Protection Policy, which is
required because of directives by the European Union.

Please provide me with any questions or comments on this policy.

I would appreciate any comments by Monday, September 11, 2000 so that this
policy can be rolled out quickly.

Thank you.

Michelle Cash


Jeff,

I will sponsor you in the amount of $957.23 in the MS 150.

The Green Hornet


Plan to put this on the website (probably post-phase 2).  Please let me know
of any comments...


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/22/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/22/2000 11:18:32 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE; Luntz Focus Groups

Attached please find the edited deregulation speech.

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>>

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Buried somewhere in these e:mail messages is a resume.  Please print for me
and put it in a resume folder (along with some others that I have in my
outbox).  I will need to review them when I am back.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 05:52 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           02/22/2001 11:14 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Superior performer - a should hire

Dear Sally,

This person comes as very highly recommended (my husband says she is one of
the best people he has ever worked with).  Do you have any suggestions on who
could use her business development skills?

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 11:13
AM ---------------------------
From: Joel Henenberg/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/22/2001 11:05 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE:

Hi Shona, Tandra does look like a good candidate.  We are holding up on our
open reqs for now, however, will pass onto IT.

Regards

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shona Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Joel Henenberg
Cc: Mary Solmonson
Subject:

This person is an outstanding performer.  My husband indicated that she was
the highest rated senior in her class, and one of the best people he has ever
worked with.  She recently left KPMG to work for a start up company, who is
now going bankrupt.

Please let me know if you are interested.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 09:10
AM ---------------------------

"Coleman, Tandra" <TColeman@FuelQuest.com> on 02/21/2001 08:19:30 AM
To: "'shona.wilson@enron.com'" <shona.wilson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

Hi Shona.  Randy told me to send my information.  I'm interested in hearing
about some of the opportunities you have to offer.  Please give me a call if
you have any questions.

 <<Tandra.DOC>>
Thanks,

> Tandra Coleman
> www.fuelquest.com
713-222-5798

 - Tandra.DOC << File: Tandra.DOC >>


Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

Trade Count:
 175  Trades
 8.0  Million Barrels
  9  Counterparties Transacting Today
 27 Counterparties Transacting to Date


I don't know who Frank Bayouth is, but the computer said it was unable to
send my little missive to him.  I'll try again and see if it recognizes you.
DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/13/99 09:32
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/13/99 09:21 AM

To: Frank Bayouth@Enron, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Enron Tag Line Change

Q:  What has ECI done for me lately?  A:  Forced me to get new business
cards.  Thanks a lot.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/13/99 09:20
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Office of the Chairman                           12/10/99 05:49 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Enron Tag Line Change

Dear Enron Employees:

 With the addition of communications to our core businesses, it is
appropriate for us to modify our existing tag line to simply "Endless
possibilities."  This change is effective immediately and replaces our
current tag line of "Natural gas. Electricity. Endless possibilities."

 To achieve our goal of a unified Enron brand, each employee has the
responsibility to make the Enron image a consistent and strong identity.
This is partially accomplished through correct application of the logo and
tag line.  A revised Corporate Identity Guidelines Book has been developed to
assist you in following the correct standards.  You may obain a copy of this
new book by completing a Forms Request and ordering Item #42629.    These
guidelines will also be made available electronically on the Brand Site at
home.enron.com.

 We'd like to take this opportunity to remind all of you about the importance
of maintaining a consistent look, especially with our stationery and business
cards.  It has come to our attention recently that some employees are having
these items produced by outside vendors and are not following the established
guidelines.  This must stop immediately.  Please use the internal resources
available to you for these items.  They will ensure that all guidelines are
followed correctly and consistently.  If you have questions on how to get
these items or on the guidelines, you may contact Marge Nadasky in Corporate
Identity at marge.nadasky@enron.com.

 One name, one company....one Enron.  Our recent reorganization brings us
another step closer to realizing this goal.  Please make sure you do your
part to protect and strengthen the Enron brand around the world.

 Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.

      Office of the Chairman


For your reading pleasure, I'm sending a copy of the infamous 97-10.

Kay


I too am a little worried about the outcome on Saturday.  I am bringing two friends that are University of Texas Alums and am just hoping to show them a good time and what true tailgating is all about.

There will be including myself 7 adults and my 3 year old son.  Is that too many?  Please let me know.  Everyone is extremely exciting and my son is now to the age that he will really enjoy it.  Last year we always took him on game day to see the raptors and he was kind of interested, but now he really enjoys animals.

Thanks again for all of your help arranging this trip.  Please also let me know again when the scholarship dinner is going to be held, I am sure some of my family would really enjoy attending.  Thanks see you at Chuck's.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	hendrix2@alumni.auburn.edu@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	RE: funds

I'm planning on it. In fact, I talked with Joe Shelnutt a little while ago
and reminded him I'm bringing you guys out there after 1 pm.

If you want, I can plan to meet you at Chuck's at 12:15 Friday.  How many
in your party?

sam

PS...After watching us the past 2 games and watching UF against LSU, I
revise my earlier prediction and now am thinking it is not going to be
pretty.


These deals are entered with SP delivery point and firm energy type.

Thanks!

560021
560662


FERC will have representatives here on Thursday December 7, 2000.  Christi
Nicolay asks that we stay out of the control room and mind our manners.

Thanks
Kayne


The 8th at 8:30 is good. The extension is fine as long as it is short.

	melanie.gray@weil.com
	11/01/2000 12:00 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com, Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Settlement Conference Call

The Trustee has proposed a conference call with Paulker on Nov. 8th beginning
at
8:30 am our time.  Are you both still available and want to go forward at that
time.

Also, they have asked that we agree to delay the briefing on the arbitration
motion.  The request, from Jane, is that they would like to first see if we
can
resolve this without the need to incur more legal fees and that a delay of a
few
weeks to allow that process to continue will not prejudice either party.  The
schedule right now, as set by the court yesterday, is the Trust's response is
due on Nov. 13th. and our reply would be due on Nov. 17th.  The court is
scheduled to hear argument on Nov. 28th.

I like the idea of keeping pressure on them, but I don't view an extension as
unreasonable or as prejudicial to EPMI.  Let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (713-546-5000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Susan, I understand that Isabel Recindes, Drew Hill, Gerno Mendosa, Michelle
Stevens, and Sherry Thomas may report directly to you. One of Enron Canada's
key customers (AEC) has been attempting for the past six months to work with
above on obtaining a detailed breakdown regarding an ongoing transaction
between Enron North America and AEC (the "Harper/Chicago" transaction). Out
of frustration with dealing with above individuals, Bill Hogue at AEC has now
elevated the issue to me. Can you please assist Bill in getting the
information he is requesting. Please advise.

Thanks in advance,

Rob Milnthorp
President & CEO
Enron Canada


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 08:49 AM -----

	dramage@bassberry.com
	05/17/2000 03:11 PM

		 To: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

 <<2105231.01>>

 - 2105231.01


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

c.john.thompson@enron.com on 11/13/2000 09:33:25 AM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

THOMPSON,C J  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on THOMPSON,C J  until you have
approved the list.


---------------------- Forwarded by Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
08:01 AM ---------------------------

	Elida Aguilar @ ENRON

	11/09/2000 03:48:26 PM

To: Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Does Heaven have a phone number?]

----- Forwarded by Elida Aguilar/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 03:48 PM -----

	"Guzman, Julia" <Julia.Guzman@photomask.com>
	11/08/2000 03:03 PM

		 To: "Hernandez, Esther" <Esther.Hernandez@photomask.com>, mguzman@fcoa.com,
Tiffany_Franks@tivoli.com, kim_moss@amat.com, Elida.Aguilar@enron.com,
sarriaga@healthsmart.net, 99jesse@netzero.net, c-trevino@worldnet.att.net,
gabrielacevedo@yahoo.com, mhernandez@thermon.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Does Heaven have a phone number?]

Julia Guzman
Global Traffic Analyst
DuPont Photomasks Inc
131 Old Settlers' Blvd
Round Rock, TX   78664
(512) 310-6548 (phone)
(512) 310-6503 (fax)
(512) 507-5170 (cell)

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra Garza [mailto:neudag@ttuhsc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:59 PM
To: Julia.Guzman@photomask.com
Subject: Re: Does Heaven have a phone number?]

>Return-Path: <lifino@worldnet.att.net>
>From: "MIKE  HANEY" <lifino@worldnet.att.net>
>To: "Steve & Cindy" <hark@nts-online.net>, "SEXY MAMA" <neush@ttuhsc.edu>,
>   "SANDRA" <smeyers@llano.net>, "Rita" <DANDRJONES2@AOL.Com>,
>   "Rick Haynes" <Portaplaze@yahoo.com>, "Randy Haynes"
<Tracker204@yahoo.com>,
>   "Mayorga" <teranteran@AOL.Com>, "Marice" <sixcraig@AOL.Com>,
>   "Lauren Meyers" <chickadette67@AOL.Com>,
>   "Jim Morrison" <nounzinda@yahoo.com>, "Jackie" <jjprice@webtv.net>,
>   "Dennis Wingert" <dwin1977@cs.com>, "Debra" <neudag@ttuhsc.edu>,
>   "Carolyn Williams" <cmw922@AOL.Com>, "Bander Fisher" <rednab@ipa.net>,
>   "Breeden, Nancy" <nbreeden@risd.k12.nm.us>,
>   "Brown, Bill Mack" <circleg@brooksdata.net>,
>   "Camp, Paula" <bepcamp@risd.k12.nm.us>,
>   "Carlyle, Janet" <jfcarlyle@yahoo.com>,
>   "Carroll, Jamie" <jc1332@hotmail.com>,
>   "Chavez, Margaret" <mchavez@risd.k12.nm.us>,
>   "dboden" <dboden@highfiber.com>, "drkim" <drkimbell42@yahoo.com>,
>   "Holloway, Martha" <bmmhollo@risd.k12.nm.us>,
>   "McDonald, Helen" <hmcdonal@risd.k12.nm.us>,
>   "Carol Carroll" <ccarroll@risd.k12.nm.us>
>Subject: Re: Does Heaven have a phone number?]
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:50:42 -0600
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carol Carroll <ccarroll@risd.k12.nm.us>
>To: McDonald, Helen <hmcdonal@risd.k12.nm.us>; Holloway, Martha
><bmmhollo@risd.k12.nm.us>; drkim <drkimbell42@yahoo.com>; dboden
><dboden@highfiber.com>; Chavez, Margaret <mchavez@risd.k12.nm.us>; Carroll,
>Jamie <jc1332@hotmail.com>; Carlyle, Janet <jfcarlyle@yahoo.com>; Camp,
>Paula <bepcamp@risd.k12.nm.us>; Brown, Bill Mack <circleg@brooksdata.net>;
>Breeden, Nancy <nbreeden@risd.k12.nm.us>
>Date: Monday, October 16, 2000 9:56 AM
>Subject: Does Heaven have a phone number?]
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Get a Kleenex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> > Does Heaven have a phone number?
>>> >> > Mommy went to Heaven, but I need her here
>>> >> > today,
>>> >> > My tummy hurts and I fell down, I need her
>>> >> > right away,
>>> >> > Operator can you tell me how to find her in
>>> >> > this book?
>>> >> > Is heaven in the yellow part, I don't know
>>> >> > where to look.
>>> >> > I think my daddy needs her too, at night I hear
>>> >> > him cry.
>>> >> > I hear him call her name sometimes, but I
>>> >> > really don't know why. Maybe if I
>>> >> > call her, she will hurry home to me.
>>> >> > Is Heaven very far away, is it across the sea?
>>> >> > She's been gone a long, long time she needs to
>>> >> > come home now!
>>> >> > I really need to reach her, but I simply don't
>>> >> > know how.
>>> >> > Help me find the number please, is it listed
>>> >> > under "Heaven"?
>>> >> > I can't read these big big words, I am only
>>> >> > seven.
>>> >> > I'm sorry operator, I didn't mean to make you
>>> >> > cry,
>>> >> > Is your tummy hurting too, or is there
>>> >> > something in your eye?
>>> >> > If I call my church maybe they will know.
>>> >> > Mommy said when we need help that's where we
>>> >> > should go.
>>> >> > I found the number to my church tacked up on
>>> >> > the wall.
>>> >> > Thank you operator, I'll give them a call.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > forward this to at least 7 people if you love
>>> >> > your mom.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


I set up a meeting for next Friday in Washington with Ed G. and Ralph Reed,
starting at 7:30 am.


Cool.


No more voice mails.  Call me or let's agree to a time.  Sara


I see that both of these deals have counterparty contact names in them now -
did this get taken care of by somebody else? I'm sorry for the late response
- I was out sick on Friday. Let me know if there's something else I can do on
these deals.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/19/2001 06:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: contact names

There are two deals that do not have contact names.  Can you check with the
trader and get him to enter names.  The confirmation has to have a contact
name or it cannot be prepared.

Thanks!

Deals #500465 and #500467


America West Airlines Weekend Surf'n Go
Wednesday, November 22, 2000

This is a post-only mailing. Please do not respond since messages will not be
read.

Due to the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, tickets must be purchased by
Thursday, November 23, 2000. Outbound travel must be Friday, November 24 with
return travel on Tuesday, November 28 or Wednesday, November 29, 2000

Current Fare Sales
******************************************************************************
*******
$99 Internet Fare Sale

Take advantage of $99 fares each way to many America West destinations when
you purchase your tickets by Friday, December 1, 2000 and travel between
Tuesday, November 28, 2000 and Wednesday, February 28, 2001. Travel
restrictions apply; visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp. For additional
information contact the americawest.com Internet Support Desk at
800-327-7810.

10% Off Fares to/from Canada

Purchase your tickets at americawest.com and receive an additional 10% off
when you travel to/from Vancouver and Toronto, Canada. Purchase your tickets
by Sunday, November 26, 2000 and travel between Monday, November 27, 2000 and
Wednesday, February 28, 2001. Visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp for details.

Free Stopovers in Las Vegas

We're adding some excitement for our cross-country travelers - a free
stopover in Las Vegas. When you connect through Las Vegas we will waive our
normal $60 stopover fee. Visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp for details.

Special Offers
******************************************************************************
*******
America West Gift Certificates

Wrap up the holidays with the gift of travel from America West. Available in
$25, $50 and $100 denominations, America West gift certificates can be used
to purchase America West tickets or an America West Vacations package. Simply
visit http://www.americawest.com/giftcertificate.htm

to place your order.? Holiday gift shopping has never been easier!

Weekend Surf'n Go
******************************************************************************
*******
To purchase a weekend Surf'n Go special fare, go to
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_emailfares-e.asp

Round trip coach fares for travel between:

$79 ??? Albuquerque, NM? - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Austin, TX? - Phoenix, AZ
$149 ?? Austin, TX? - Portland, OR
$199 ?? Baltimore, MD - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Denver, CO? - Orange/Santa Ana, CA
$69 ??? Las Vegas, NV? - Los Angeles, CA
$69 ??? Las Vegas, NV? - Phoenix, AZ
$69 ??? Los Angeles, CA? - Las Vegas, NV
$79 ??? Los Angeles, CA? - Tucson, AZ
$69 ??? Ontario, CA - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Orange/Santa Ana, CA - Denver, CO
$79 ??? Orange/Santa Ana, CA - Phoenix, AZ
$79???? Phoenix, AZ - Albuquerque, NM
$139 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Austin, TX
$199 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Baltimore, MD
$69???? Phoenix, AZ? - Las Vegas, NV
$69???? Phoenix, AZ? - Ontario, CA
$79 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - Orange/Santa Ana, CA
$139??? Phoenix, AZ? - Portland, OR
$99 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - San Francisco, CA
$99 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - San Jose, CA
$139 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Spokane, WA
$149??? Portland, OR? - Austin, TX
$139??? Portland, OR? - Phoenix, AZ?
$99???? San Francisco, CA? - Phoenix, AZ
$99 ??? San Jose, CA? - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Spokane, WA - Phoenix, AZ
$79 ??? Tucson, AZ? - Los Angeles, CA

Terms and Conditions:

Purchase Ticket By:? Thursday, 11/23/00, 9:00pm PDT
Travel Outbound:? Friday, 11/24/00?
Travel Return:? Tuesday, 11/28/00 or Wednesday, 11/29/00
Travel On:? Flights operated by America West and America West Express
Purchased Through:? americawest.com
Ticket Refundability:? Non-refundable
Itinerary Changes:? Subject to seat availability, $75 change fee, and
difference in fare if applicable
Minimum Stay:? 2 nights
Black Out Dates:? None
Routing:? Round trip only, Routing restrictions may apply
Other Discounts:? Not combinable with any other discount
Seat Inventory:? Limited - subject to availability
Federal Excise Tax:? $2.50 per flight segment through December 31, 2000.
$2.75 per flight segment effective January 1, 2001.? A flight segment is
defined as a take off and landing

Passenger Facility Charges:? Up to $20 per person, depending on itinerary

America West Vacations
******************************************************************************
*******
Book your vacation online http://www.americawestvacations.com/

These rates are effective for stay Friday, November 24 through Tuesday,
November 28, 2000 and do not include airfare.

$276/four nights*?????? Las Vegas, NV - Circus Circus, Las Vegas, NV

Book online or call America West Vacations at 1-800-356-6611 for details.

Terms and Conditions

*Rates quoted are per person, based on double occupancy, and may not apply to
groups or during holiday/convention dates as specified by individual hotels.?
Terms & Conditions apply. Prices and offers are capacity controlled and
subject to change; availability is limited. , 2000 The Leisure Company.? CST
2043556-20

???????

Hilton Hotel Specials
******************************************************************************
*******
These room rates are effective November 24 through 27, 2000

$49/Night?????? Albuquerque, NM - Doubletree Albuquerque, Albuquerque NM

$199/Night????? Austin, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites Austin, Austin TX

$89/Night?????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Glendale, Glendale CA

$109/Night????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Torrance/South Bay, Torrance CA

$119/Night ???? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport,
Irvine CA

$89/Night?????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San
Pedro CA

$67/Night ????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Whittier, Whittier CA

$119/Night ???? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport,
Irvine CA

$67/Night ????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Whittier, Whittier CA

$69/Night?????? Phoenix, AZ? - Doubletree Guest Suites Phoenix Gateway
Center, Phoenix AZ

$79/Night ????? Phoenix, AZ? - Doubletree Scottsdale Paradise Valley,
Scottsdale AZ

$119/Night????? Phoenix, AZ? - Hilton Mesa Pavilion, Mesa AZ

$68/Night?????? Portland, OR? - Hilton Garden Inn Portland/Lake Oswego, Lake
Oswego OR

$87/Night ????? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Concord, Concord CA

$119/Night ???? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco Airport
North, San Francisco CA

$89/Night ????? San Francisco, CA? - Doubletree Modesto, Modesto CA

$199/Night????? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View,
Mountain View CA

$189/Night ???? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton San Jose and Towers, San Jose CA

$89/Night ????? San Jose, CA? - Doubletree Modesto, Modesto CA

$199/Night????? San Jose, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View, Mountain
View CA

$129/Night????? San Jose, CA? - Hilton Newark/Fremont, Newark CA

$189/Night ???? San Jose, CA? - Hilton San Jose and Towers,
San Jose CA

$69/Night?????? Spokane, WA? - Doubletree Spokane City Center, Spokane WA

These room rates are effective November 24 through 28, 2000

$109/Night ???? Baltimore, MD? - Hilton Washington Embassy Row, Washington DC

$54/Night ????? Denver, CO? - Doubletree Hotel Denver? - Southeast, Aurora CO

$75/Night ????? Los Angeles, CA? - Doubletree Anaheim/Orange County, Orange
CA

$75/Night?????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Doubletree Anaheim/Orange County,
Orange CA

$89/Night ????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro,
San Pedro CA

$59/Night ????? Tucson, AZ? - Doubletree Guest Suites Tucson, Tucson AZ

To book this week's Hilton "Family" Value Rates, visit
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values_main.html. Check online for specific

dates for each hotel location or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for "Value
Rates."

Terms and Conditions:

Value Rates are available only during the specific week in which they are
published via the America West Surf'n Go Internet site and www.hilton.com.
Limited availability; rooms at these Value Rates are sold on a first-come,
first-served basis. Availability, rate, and terms of occupancy are not
guaranteed and will be confirmed at time of reservation. Participating hotels,

rates and terms are subject to change without notice. Single or double
occupancy.? Early check-in, late check-out subject to availability. No extra
charge for children when they stay in parents' or grandparents' room; total
room occupancy subject to local fire safety regulations and other applicable
laws or regulations. Rates vary by season, do not include any other fees or
charges,

including without limitation state or local taxes or gratuities and are
subject to change without notice.? Advance booking required.? One night's
nonrefundable deposit is required at time of booking. Offer cannot be
combined with any other special discounts, coupons, certificates, special
rates, promotional offers, award stays, or meeting/group stays. Hilton
reserves the right to cancel any Value Rate at any time without notice.
Hilton is not responsible for the terms

of other offers in the program, or for any electronic, computer, telephone,
security, virus or any other problem or damage related to use of the program
or its offers.

To change your e-mail address or to subscribe/unsubscribe to this weekly
mailing, please visit? http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_subscribe.asp .


Will you or anyone in your group attend.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valley, Lisa
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Miller, Kent; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	December 4, 2001

Dave Neubauer will be hosting a social hour/hors d'oeuvres in Minneapolis for some of the North End customers.  If you are available and would like to attend, please let me know.  The details are as follows:

	Tuesday, December 4th
	4:00 pm - 8:00 pm
	Embassy Suites Hotel - Minneapolis Airport

Thank you.


NO problem///   we need to get together sometime..........

the kid!


Matt, your new responsibility for 7:30 meeting will be to go over all gen
outages in the west by region and fuel type, and to discuss the previous days
gen numbers and load forecasts.  Including pricing info and heat rates from
the Portland guys and/or Megawatt Daily will also help.  Effective on
Thursday.

Thanks,
Mike


Kate and Teresa:

We are working on a time sensitive project and ask that you assist us in determining the names of various Enron entities by doing an historical analysis or whatever means you use.

The entities I need info on are:

Enron Gas Processing Company
Enron Gas Marketing Canada
Enron Oil Canada Ltd.
Enron Oil Corporation

Are these prior names of current Enron entities, are they existing entities, etc.?

Please call me if you need any additional info or if my request is confusing.

Thanks for your help!

Marie
x33907


As of the 6th TW and NNG are balanced, I agree with Gary we need to stay balanced.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spraggins, Gary
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 12:33 PM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers
Subject:	TW/NNG Imbalance

Looks like we made up gas NNG owed TW the last few days, so lets stayed balanced on a daily basis.

Gary


SUB's data responses to PS-SP:001 - 004, along with attachments, are below.
Due to problems with the Discovery page these responses are e-mailed.  It is
SUB's understanding that PS-SP:001 - 004 are the only data requests from
Puget Sound to Springfield.  Hard copies are being mailed to Mr. Marshall
and the Hearing Clerk.

 <<Data Response PS_SP_001.doc>>  <<Data Response PS_SP_002.doc>>  <<Data
Response PS_SP_003.doc>>  <<Data Response PS_SP_004.doc>>  <<IOU04.xls>>
<<Aluminum Study Summary.pdf>>

> request_number:  PS-SP:001-004
> firstname:  Steven
> lastname:  Marshall
> e-mail:  marss@perkinscoie.com
> directed_to:  Peter Mershereau
> 1600 Benj. Franklin Plaza
> One SW Columbia Street
> Portland, Oregon  97201
> exhibit_wp-02-e-:  SP-02
> page_numbers:  Pages 4, 9 and Table 4
> request_text:  PS-SP:001:  Page 4, Line 22:  Please provide the basis for
> the use of 7,000 as the number of DSI jobs in the region.  Please provide
> all information available to you on the number of DSI jobs in the region,
> including, if available, the number of jobs by facility, company,
> location, and/or state.  Also include this information for each month or
> year for as many years as available, including forecast data.
>
> PS-SP:002:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the information included in
> Table 4 by company.
>
> PS-SP:003:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the information included in
> Table 4 using the IOU rate testimony, which BPA suggests, would result in
> much higher exchange benefits.
>
> PS-SP:004:  Page 9, Table 4:  Please provide the entire basis for the data
> shown in the table.
>
>
> contact_name:  Steven C. Marshall
> contact_address:  Perkins Coie
> One Bellevue Center, Suite 1800
> 411 - 108th Avenue N.E.
> Bellevue, Washington  98004
> contact_phone:  425-453-7314
> contact_email:  marss@perkinscoie.com
> contact_fax:  425-453-7350
> delivery_instructions:  Please mail hard copies of data responses to Steve
> Marshall.
>

 - Data Response PS_SP_001.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_002.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_003.doc
 - Data Response PS_SP_004.doc
 - IOU04.xls
 - Aluminum Study Summary.pdf


Do you want legal bills for this aspect of the project sent through on the
EnronOnline work order or separately?


please go
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
01:55 PM ---------------------------
From: Jenny Rub@ENRON on 10/31/2000 01:25 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob McAuliffe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Dziadek/NA/Enron@Enron, Martin
Bucknell/LON/ECT@ECT, Henry Terech/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Knight/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thais
Hensch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Nina
Garcia/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daisy Yanez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elaine Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Therese Candella/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tara
Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Fieldhouse/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dealerboard Vendor Executive Presentation

We are in the final selection phase of dealerboards for our new trading
floor.  Two vendors have been asked to come in an present executive overviews
of their products, company and future direction.  The attached document
contains the dates, times and location of the briefings (IPC Information
Systems and BT Syntegra).

If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Stuart
Fieldhouse at x35699.

Thanks.    Jenny Rub


Mark --

Here is what Richard is comfortable with...

	"We continue to schedule gas and power deliveries and to the extent that we are able to do so, given current conditions, we will perform on our contracts."

Call or e-mail me your thoughts.

Eric


What do I have with you in non-registered accounts?

Chris


The two new pooling points are as follows:   1).  Aqua Dulce Pool   = 987349

            2):  Corpus Christi Pool  =  987350


I'm always here so just coordinate with my assistant, Ina Rangle.   Thanks,
John

Kathie Grabstald
11/20/2000 02:32 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENSIDE Newsletter

Good Afternoon, John!

Thanks for agreeing to be one of the Profile articles in the next issue of
the ENSIDE.  Michelle Vitrella assured me that you would be an interesting
topic!  Our newsletter is set for publication in February and I am setting my
interview schedule now.  I would love to sit down and visit with you for
about 30 minutes in the early part of December.  Please let me know a day and
time that is convenient for you.

I look forward to hearing from you!
Kathie Grabstald
ENA Public Relations
x 3-9610


Mark,

Tanya requested that I forward the following email to you.  Please contact me
if I can provide any further information or assistance.

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Radous/Corp/Enron on 01/03/2001
07:03 PM ---------------------------

From:  Tanya Rohauer @ ECT
         01/03/2001 06:57 PM

To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund

Has Mark Taylor been informed?

From:  Paul Radous @ ENRON
         01/03/2001 04:53 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund

A little update on the hedge funds.

Apparently, these types of customers do not contact us if they do not receive
confirmations of their trades.  This has lead to a problem.  Smith Barney has
indicated that they completed a January swing buy from Enron, trade date
11/28/00.  We have no record of the trade, and the tapes have since been
erased/destroyed.   And, of course, they never sent correspondence to us
indicating that they lacked a confirmation.  In defense of Smith Barney, they
might have contacted us if we had been anywhere close to timely on our
issuance of the other confirmations.  Since our traders transacted without
approval, we were not prepared with the special language.   I had no idea
this trade existed until the c/p disagreed with our mark to market numbers.

John Arnold is in discussions with the counterparty.  I am supposed to be
hearing the resolution tomorrow.  The position on the trade in dispute is
approximately $1MM out of the money from Enron's perspective.

I will keep you posted.


The following Late/Pending nom has been rejected:

Company: 000236    Arng: 37147-15052    Eff Date: 2001-11-27

                          Nominated
           Location        Quantity

Receipt    P1037161          10,000
Delivery   P1037147          10,000

REJECTED REASON: POOL OUT OF BALANCE

This document was created by TCO0060  in the DB2P subsystem in TRANS ID SMI0, program TJ90018


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to help?  Forward this e-mail to your friends, and have them
sign-up @ http://www.bushetrain.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bush Recount News
http://www.georgewbush.com

Contents:

1    Talking Points: Summary of Florida Supreme Court Decision

2    Help the Bush Cheney Florida Recount Effort

3    Dissenting Opinion of Chief Justice Charles J. Wells

4    Statement By Secretary James Baker

5    What They're Saying...

"Well, if you're a fan of chaos, you're in Nirvana."
- John Shubin [Florida Elections Expert] MSNBC, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

1
SUMMARY OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DECISION

~ A deeply divided Florida Supreme Court has opened up a Pandora's
  box of inconsistent standards, flawed hand counting, and delays
  that call into question Florida's ability to be represented in
  the Electoral College.

~ Further, the court's narrow, liberal majority has made a mockery
  of the idea of "counting every vote" by selecting only certain
  ballots and providing no standard to count them.  The four
  activist justices rewrote Florida's election laws after the
  election -- a clear violation of federal law.

~ Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Wells offered a stinging and
  forceful dissent; concluding:

  ~ "The majority's decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which
    will certainly immediately follow under the United States
    Constitution"

  ~ "The majority's decision to return the case to the circuit
    court for a count of the under-votes from Miami-Dade County or
    all counties has no foundation in the law of Florida as it
    existed on November 7, 2000..."

  ~ "I have a deep and abiding concern that the prolonging of
    judicial process in this counting contest propels this country
    and this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary
    constitutional crisis.

  ~ Judge Wells said the county-by county decision-making on the
    "clear indication of the intent of the voter":  "is fraught with
    equal protection concerns which will eventually cause the
    election results in Florida to be stricken by the federal courts
    or Congress."

~ For example, in Miami-Dade County, the justices reinstated 168
  votes that were awarded to Gore as the result of manual recounts
  conducted in only some precincts - all of them overwhelmingly
  Democratic. This would be the ultimate in treating some votes
  differently from others.

~ The Court ordered a recount of all counties' undervotes, but
  there are five major problems:

  ~ First, in many counties the undervotes aren't even segregated,
    so they will have to be machine tabulated and separated. We
    know this causes chads to fall off ballots and other
    degradation of ballots.

  ~ Second, 16 counties don't even know which of their non-votes
    are undervotes and which are overvotes.

  ~ Third, even in counties that have attempted to separate the
    undervote, there are serious problems. In Miami-Dade, the
    number of undervotes submitted to the Circuit Court is
    different from the number identified in the November 8
    machine recount. There can be no confidence that the pool of
    undervotes is untainted and consistent.

  ~ Fourth, the majority accepted two different standards (the
    liberal Broward standard and the more objective Palm Beach
    standard) further proving votes are treated differently in
    each county.

  ~ Fifth, as Chief Justice Wells said, the liberal court
    majority failed "to make provision for: (1) the
    qualifications of those who count; (2) what standards are
    used in the count-are they the same standards for all
    ballots statewide or a continuation of the county-by-
    county constitutionally suspect standards; (3) who is to
    observe the count; (4) how one objects to the count; (5)
    who is entitled to object to the count; (6) whether a
    person may object to a counter; (7) the possible lack of
    personnel to conduct the count; (8) the fatigue of the
    counters; and (9) the effect of the differing intra-county
    standards.

_________________________________________________________________

2
HELP THE BUSH-CHENEY FLORIDA RECOUNT EFFORT

Want to help? Forward this e-mail to your friends.  Then, if you
have not yet given to the Bush Cheney Recount, contribute online
using our secure servers here:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfmAID=IVFFBXFAZHGH

AOL Users: Bush Cheney Recount

_________________________________________________________________

3
DISSENT OF CHIEF JUSTICE CHARLES J. WELLS

"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution."

Excerpt:

"I want to make it clear at the outset of my separate opinion that
I do not question the good faith or honorable intentions of my
colleagues in the majority.  However, I could not more strongly
disagree with their decision to reverse the trial court and
prolong this judicial process.  I also believe that the majority's
decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which will certainly
immediately follow under the United States Constitution.

"My succinct conclusion is that the majority's decision...has no
foundation in the law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000,
or at anytime until the issuance of this opinion.  The majority
returns the case to the circuit court for this partial recount of
under-votes on the basis of unknown or, at best, ambiguous
standards with authority to obtain help from others, the
credentials, qualifications, and objectivity of whom are totally
unknown.  That is but a first glance at the imponderable problems
that the majority creates.

"This case has reached the point where finality must take
precedence over continued judicial process.  I agree with a quote
from John Allen Paulos, a professor of mathematics at Temple
University, when he wrote that, "[t]he margin of error in this
election is far greater than the margin of victory, no matter who
wins."  Further judicial process will not change this self-evident
fact and will only result in confusion and disorder.  Justice
Terrell and this Court wisely counseled against such a course of
action sixty-four years ago.  I would heed that sound advice and
affirm Judge Sauls.

Full Opinion:
http://a388.g.akamai.net/f/388/21/1d/www.cnn.com/ELECTION/200/resources/fla.sc
.opin1208.pdf

_________________________________________________________________

4
STATEMENT BY FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES A. BAKER, III
December 8, 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen,

This has been a rather eventful day here in Tallahassee.  Two
Circuit Court opinions throwing out challenges to absentee ballots
in Seminole and Martin counties.  A federal judge ordering the
counting of overseas absentee ballots in many counties that were
not counted for technical reasons.  And of course, the
disappointing 4 to 3 decision of the Florida Supreme Court just
announced, which will require manually recounting tens of
thousands of non-votes and undervotes in all Florida counties that
have not yet had a manual recount - and trying to do so by
December 12.

This is what happens when for the first time in modern history, a
candidate resorts to lawsuits to try to overturn the outcome of
an election for President.  It is very sad.  For Florida, for the
nation, and for our democracy.

Today's ruling by four justices of the Florida Supreme Court is of
course a disappointment.  Its reasoning and result place the Court
once again at odds with sound judgments of Florida's lower courts,
the Florida Legislature, local election officials, and, in our
view, the US Supreme Court.  This action will unfortunately
produce ongoing uncertainty and could ultimately disenfranchise
Florida's votes in the Electoral College.

The ruling of the Florida Court's four justices is flawed in much
the same way we think as its November 21 ruling that was vacated
unanimously by the United States Supreme Court.

Let me read you what Chief Justice Wells said in part of his
dissent today:
"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand the
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution...  [T]he majority's decision to return this
case to the circuit court for a count of the under-votes from
either Miami-Dade County or all counties has no foundation in the
law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000, or at any time
until the issuance of this opinion...  [T]he prolonging of
judicial process in this counting contest propels this country and
this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary constitutional
crisis.  I have to conclude that there is a real and present
likelihood that this constitutional crisis will do substantial
damage to our country, our state, and to this Court as an
institution." [pp. 41-42]

We agree with the three justices who dissented from the action of
the other four.  We believe this ruling is inconsistent with
Florida law, federal law, and the United States Constitution.
Therefore, we have no alternative other than to appeal once again
to the United States Supreme Court for relief.  We have already
put in motion the process to do so.

_________________________________________________________________

5
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING...

Judge Andrew Napolitano  [Fox News Legal Analyst]:  "...what is
this doing?  Changing the rules yet again, in the face of a federal
law that says you can't change counting procedures and rules after
six days prior to the election."
-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

Jim Axelrod [CBS News Correspondent]: "One of the first people I
saw after the Supreme Court ruling was Dexter Douglass, a member of
the Gore legal team.  I asked him what was next.  He said, 'Chaos.'
So far, nothing's been done to help clarify the situation."
-CBS Evening News, 12/08/00

Tim Russert  [NBC News]:  "...we could have chaos and a
constitutional crisis...This is as close to a political civil war
as I've ever witnessed."
-NBC Nightly News, 12/08/00

Mike Isikoff  [Newsweek Magazine]:  "...The Republicans got a bit
of a shot in the arm.  I was just reading the dissent of Chief
Justice Wells on this case, and he is pretty stinging.  It is
surprising language from a chief justice of a state court.  He
pretty much says flatly that his colleagues were wrong as a matter
of law.  They're going to be reversed by--he predicts they will be
reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and also projects--talks about
a constitutional crisis that is going to flow from this.  So if
the Republicans need some leg to hang their position on, they've
got it in this dissent..."

John Gibson:  "Mike Isikoff, a crucial question is here.  What
standard is this recount going to be counted under?  Any clue?"

Mike Isikoff:  "No.  That is exactly the question that I think is
going to loom largest over the next few days."

-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

Paid for by Bush-Cheney Recount
http://www.georgewbush.com
______________________________________________

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

To become an eChampion click here:

http://www.echampions2000.com


I will be out of the office starting  07/01/0200 and will not return until
07/16/2000.

I will be out of the office from Saturday, July 1st through Sunday, July
16th, returning Monday, July 17th.  I will be checking voice mail messgaes
regularly and will have access to e-mail.

Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 02:37 PM -----

	"Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
	02/28/2001 08:57 PM

		 To: "'Sanders, Richard'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Status of Duke Energy v. State and ISO v. Reliant et al.

Richard,

 Per Gary's request, here is the status of Duke Energy v. Governor
Davis and ISO v. Reliant.

Duke v. State of California.

 According to a news article, on February 27, 2001, Duke Energy Corp.
suspended its lawsuit against Gray Davis and the State "after the California
Department of Water Resources agreed to buy power from Duke that was
formerly being provided under contracts with two financially trouble
utilities."

 Originally, Duke argued that Governor Davis exceeded his authority
under the Emergency Services Act when he commandeered Duke's long-term
contracts.

 The case is suspended until an April 30 hearing.  I am trying to
obtain a copy of any order and/or stipulation filed with the Court.

ISO v. Reliant, et al.

 I.  Brief Summary of Complaint

 In ISO v. Reliant, et al., ISO seeks a preliminary injunction to
require six Reliant entities, Williams Energy Marketing & Trading, four AES
entities, and Dynegy Power Corporation (collectively, "Defendants") to
provide generation in response to ISO's emergency dispatch instructions.

 ISO's sole allegation is that because Defendants submitted to the
ISO Tariff by participating in the ISO markets and by entering into
Scheduling Coordinator Agreements and Participating Generator Agreements,
Defendants cannot refuse to generate in response to an emergency dispatch
order.  This allegation is based upon section 5.6.1 of the Tariff.

 II.  Current Status of the Case -- February 23, 2001 Stipulation

On February 23, 2001, the parties entered a stipulation, which states, in
relevant part:

   The Reliant Defendants, Williams, and Dynegy
(collectively "Generator Defendants") will comply with emergency dispatch
orders of the California ISO under the terms of the ISO tariff without
regard to whether ISO allocates the cost of power produced in response to
such a dispatch order to a creditworthy Scheduling Coorindator until the
earlier of the following:

   (a) 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on March 19,
2001, or

   (b) two business days (but in no event less than 48
hours) after written notice to this Court and the parties by a Generator
Defendant that this stipulated obligation is terminated as to it.

   3. Notice of termination by a Generator Defendant of
its obligation under paragraph 2(b) shall not affect the stipulated
obligations or remaining Generator Defendants except that, on receipt of
such notice, each remaining Generator Defendant shall have the right to file
with the Court an election terminating its obligation. In the event of such
an election, the obligation of a terminating Generator Defendant to comply
with ISO dispatch orders imposed by paragraph 2 shall end 48 hours after
written notice to ISO of the election to terminate. Each terminating
Generator Defendant shall have the same right and status to participate in
any legal proceedings that follow the initial notice of termination,
including any appeal.

   4. The motions heard by this Court on February 16,
2001, including ISO's motion for preliminary injunction, Reliant's motion to
dismiss or stay pursuant to the FERC order, and DWR's motion to dismiss
Reliant's third party complaint, will be deemed submitted at 5:00 p.m. on
March 16, 2001, or at 5:00 p.m. on the day written notice of termination of
the obligation stipulated in paragraph 2 is filed with the Court, whichever
is earlier.

 III.  February 16th Hearing

 Below is a summary of the hearing held on February 16th in the
Reliant case, which I initially prepared on Saturday, February 17th.  I
apologize if you did not receive this earlier.

>  The hearing involved three motions:
>
>  (A) ISO's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
>  (B) Reliant's Motion to Dismiss or Stay
>  (C) DWR's Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint
>
>  Judge Damrell took each motion under submission and stated that he
> will issue an order on or before February 21, 2001 at 5:00 p.m.  He
> ordered the February 8, 2001 TRO to remain in effect until then.  Judge
> Damrell clarified that the TRO requires Defendants to respond to all ISO
> Emergency Dispatch Orders ("EDOs") regardless of the creditworthiness of
> the purchasers.  The Judge encouraged Defendants to stipulate that they
> would respond to ISO EDOs, and gave Defendants until February 20, 2001 to
> do so.  (It appears that only AES is willing to do so at this time).
>
Summary

>  ISO's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Reliant's Motion to
> Dismiss/ Stay are linked in that they essentially relate to the same
> issue:  Are generators obligated to respond to EDOs despite having no
> assurances that they will be paid, i.e., assurances that a creditworthy
> purchaser will be buying the generation in response to the EDO?
>
>  A.  Reliant's Motion to Dismiss or to Stay
>
>  Reliant's motion to dismiss or alternatively to stay was based
> solely upon a February 14, 2001 FERC order conditionally adopting ISO's
> proposed Amendment 36.  This FERC Order (as I understand it from the
> arguments) allows ISO to waive the creditworthy requirement only with
> respect to PG&E and SCE scheduling of energy to meet their own load.
>
>  Parsing the Order, Reliant argued that the Order implicitly means
> that the creditworthy requirement is not waived with respect to all other
> purchases, including EDOs.  Because of the FERC Order, Reliant argued that
> ISO's complaint, which seeks injunctive relief requiring Defendants to
> respond to EDOs without assurances of creditworthiness, should be
> dismissed.  Alternatively, Reliant argued that because the proceeding
> before FERC continues, the Court should stay this case pending the outcome
> by FERC.
>
>  ISO argued that according to the language of the FERC Order, FERC
> explicitly did not rule on the issue related to the application of the
> creditworthiness requirement to EDOs.  And, a stay is improper because due
> to energy crisis, ISO cannot wait for FERC to decide this issue.
>
>  Analysis:  Judge Damrell appeared very skeptical of Reliant's
> interpretation of the Order.  He asked, "If FERC intended that the
> creditworthy requirements apply to EDO, why didn't it address it head-on,
> especially because the importance of this issue was raised by Dynegy
> before FERC?"  He questioned Reliant about several sentences in the Order
> which suggest that FERC explicitly did not decide the issue.
>
>  Judge Damrell is unlikely to stay the proceedings.  He stated that
> the exigencies of the situation are such that he perhaps he should not
> wait for FERC to rule.  He made several comments about how long it takes
> FERC to act, and that the Federal Courts should step in times of crisis
> such as this.
>
>  B.  ISO's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
>
>  In support of its motion for a preliminary injunction to require
> Defendants to provide generation in response to EDOs, ISO argued as
> follows: (1) Defendants submitted to the ISO Tariff by participating in
> the ISO markets and by entering into Scheduling Coordinator Agreements and
> Participating Generator Agreements; (2) Section 5.6.1 of the Tariff
> obligates Defendants to respond to EDOs; (3) EDOs are essential to "keep
> the lights on;" and (4) because the decision to issue EDOs are made only
> in times of emergencies, the ISO does not look at who the purchaser is, is
> not required to by the Tariff, and should not be required to because of
> the current energy crisis.
>
>  Defendants argued that they need not respond to an EDO without
> assurances that they would be selling to a creditworthy purchaser because
> (1) the creditworthy requirement is an essential element of the Tariff;
> and (2) a 2/14/01 FERC Order held that the creditworthy requirement
> applies even EDOs.
>
>  Dynegy raised an additional argument -- ISO and DWR are using the
> EDO procedures to get a price below market and that there is no real
> threat that the lights will go out.  According to Dynegy, DWR can back
> real time purchases including EDOs, but instead DWR backs only purchases
> at a certain price below market.  If generators refuse, ISO issues an EDO,
> with no assurances that the generators will get paid, as a strong arm
> tactic to get this below market price.  Dynegy argued that the reality is
> that the lights will not go out because if generators do not abide by the
> EDOs, DWR has enough money to buy at market rate.  There would be no issue
> here if DWR would pay the just and reasonable rate for the electricity,
> rather than using EDO procedures to lower the rate.  And, DWR can go to
> FERC if it believes that the rate is unjust and unreasonable.
>
>  Analysis:  Judge Damrell certainly appeared to be leaning towards
> the ISO.  He expressed his views that this case involves a narrow issue --
> do the Defendants have an obligation to respond to EDO's without
> assurances that it will get paid in this time of crisis.  His questions
> and comments suggest that he believes that the amount of energy subject to
> the EDO's is small and necessary to avert rolling black-outs.  He
> questioned Mr. Detmer, manager of operation of ISO, who suggested that
> about 5% of purchases at peak are made through EDOs.
>
>  Judge Damrell was not very sympathetic towards Dynegy's argument,
> asking "Are you was saying that DWR, ISO and the State are the cause of
> the crisis?"  Several times, Judge Damrell stated that he thought the high
> wholesale prices caused the crisis.  According to Judge Damrell, "the
> simple fact is, you got rich, and the utilities went broke."  Also, as
> noted above, Judge Damrell does not believe that waiting for FERC to make
> decisions is the proper course in the current energy crisis because FERC
> does not act quickly enough.
>
>  C.  DWR's Motion to Dismiss 3rd Party Complaint

 Reliant brought a third party complaint against DWR, and DWR moved
to dismiss.  As framed by the Court, the key issue is:  does 11th Amendment
prohibit Reliant from joining DWR in the case?  Judge Damrell asked about
the 11th Amendment immunity argument, stating that the issue was not
thoroughly briefed.  The Judge asked the parties to file supplemental briefs
on the issue.

 I am obtaining a copy of these supplemental briefs and I will
summarize DWR's argument in a subsequent email.

> Peter P. Meringolo
> Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP
> Spear Tower
> One Market
> San Francisco, CA 94105
> Main:  (415) 442-0900
> Direct:  (415) 442-1285
> Fax:  (415) 442-1010
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 05:24 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	07/20/2000 04:58 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 07/20/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/20/00.

Regards,
tm


I found her.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/13/2001 04:44 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: My departure from ETS

Nice move.  She's a good find.  How much is the finder's fee?

	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/13/2001 03:00 PM

		 To: David K Bargainer/ENRON@enronXgate, Staci Holtzman/ENRON@enronXgate,
Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet
Cones/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy Phillips/ENRON@enronXgate, Candace
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate, Jan
Cobden/ENRON@enronXgate, Denise LaGesse/ENRON@enronXgate, Philip
Crowley/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, Lorraine Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, Jeffery
Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis
Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/Enron@enronXgate, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob
Burleson/Enron@enronXgate, Steve Weller/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ENRON@enronXgate, Ann Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Donna
Martens/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ruth
Mann/ENRON@enronXgate, Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael P
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, Colleen
Raker/ENRON@enronXgate, William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, TK
Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Don Powell/ENRON@enronxgate, Janet
Butler/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, (bcc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: My departure from ETS

As some of you might already have heard, I will move to Enron Corp.
Government Affairs on April 30.  My primary responsibility will be to advise
the power traders on regulatory and other matters.  While it will be
difficult to leave, I know this is a good opportunity for me.  Thank all of
you for your encouragement, advice and support; this is a great group and I
will miss working with you.


Rick:

Thanks for the message.  I have sent an e-mail to Nick.  I will coordinate
with him.

Mark


Everyone, J.C. asked me to send the following message:

Yesterday, the Houston federal court (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas) entered an Order consolidating all cases "involving or related to the financial difficulties of Enron" before one Judge, Lee Rosenthal (who was the Judge to whom the earliest-filed case had been assigned and who conducted the hearing last Friday). The consolidation order grants a motion that we and other defense counsel had made. It means that all cases in the Houston federal court should proceed in a more orderly, coordinated fashion.

A technical detail - the Order provides for three separate consolidated proceedings before Judge Rosenthal: (i) the federal securities cases; (ii) the derivative cases (at least those that have been filed in federal court); and (iii) the employee benefit plan cases.

Finally, the Order allows parties ten days to file objections to consolidation. While someone may well file an objection, we cannot think of any meritorious grounds for an objection.

As always, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call us.

Terri Richardson
Assistant to J.C. Nickens

This e-mail and any attached files may be confidential and subject to attorney/client privilege. If you received it in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail or by calling (713)654-7600.


Remember to look at your school schedule so we can book our flights to Kansas.

D