As per Sergio's and Rick's request, please find enclosed a quick summary on
the ANEEL's  "intervention" in the MAE.

This note is organized in four main sections:

a) What was it?
b) Initial reactions
c) Enron's view
d) Next steps

a) WHAT WAS IT?

 Aneel has recently issued a series of three Resolutions (160/161/162)
significantly changing the structure and governance of MAE. It has also
amended some of the MAE rules regarding penalties and guarantees on financial
settlement.

 In terms of structure, ANEEL has empowered ASMAE to develop its
responsibilities. ASMAE  is the organization in charge of developing MAE's
basic operational functions, such as metering, contract registering, spot
price calculation and financial settlement. It also has a role in developing
the MAE rules, an effort which started in November 1998 and has not yet come
to fruition. ASMAE formerly reported to COEX, the MAE Board of Directors,
According to the recently enacted Resolution ASMAE will have now a solid line
relationship with ANEEL and it was empowered to develop it basic
organizational functions more independently from the Board of Directors.

 In terms of governance, ANEEL has terminated COEX, a 26 stakeholder Board in
charge or runinng MAE and preparing the MAE rules. The Resolution was
effective immediately. In lieu of COEX, ANEEL has created COMAE, a new 6
member professional  Board, in charge of overseeing ASMAE and developing MAE
rules, on an ongoing basis. COMAE should be operational in two months.
ANEEL,Distributors and Generators should appoint two voting members each.
Similarly to COEX, COMAE will still report to the MAE General Assembly, where
all stakeholdershave a seat (votes are equally split between generators and
distributors)

 In terms of MAE rules, ANEEL has now imposed penalties and guarantees. Those
were part of the MAE rules since the very beginning, but they have never been
implemented. The original MAE rules encompassed a broader range of penalties.
ANEEL has focused solely on the the penalties of financial nature, the ones
strictly necessary to have the financial settlement up and running.

 There is a 60 day period to put the new organization and governance in
place. In the meantime, ASMAE will continue its routine functions. If doubts
arise, ASMAE will clarify directly with ANEEL

b) INITIAL REACTIONS

 Most companies were shocked with the new Resolutions. The Resolutions were
issued on a Friday, late afternoon, to allow agents to dissipate their anger
over the weekend. The measures were considered a unilateral "coup-de-etat"
kind of intervention. A lot of criticism was raised on the "legality" of the
process. Initial reactions challenged ANEEL's ability to intervene in the MAE
rules and terminate COEX.

 Similar reactions were expressed the following week. A COEX meeting (void in
legal terms) was held the following week to verbalize people's angers and
discuss next steps. An immediate General Assembly was scheduled. Several COEX
members got really upset. Reasons vary: some are questioning the necessity of
those actions, although most agree that COEX was not a functioning organic
body. Some COEX member got very emotional: afterall, their hierarchical
positions inside their organizations depend on the status granted  by being a
COEX member.

 ANEEL invited CEOs from all affiliated companies to explain the rationale
behind those measures and avoid direct confrontation with COEX, whose members
are motivated by more parochial views. The meeting was useful and most of the
negative reaction was placated.

 No one is now is now considering any legal action against ANEEL. Most
stakeholders agree that something had to be done, despite the fact that the
way ANEEL invervened was disastrous and with doubtful legal validity. The
issue now is to prepare a new Market Agreement, containing the basic mandates
and addressing utility's concerns.

c) Enron's view

 Enron thinks that the proposed changes were badly needed. Enron has publicly
and in several occasions expressed its view about COEX role in MAE
implementation. In Informativo Regulat?rio # 3, issued back in November 2000,
we blamed the stakeholder nature of COEX for most of MAE problems. Nothing
was being decided. COEX attempted to get the MAE rules in place for more than
two years without success. No one (except a few, including Enron) was
interested in getting MAE up and running. Rather, most agents were interested
in conforming the MAE rules to meet their ad-hoc individual parochial
interests. The COEX attempt to deal with the nuclear issue was a clear na<ve,
retreat to objectives. Procrastination was the rule of the game. In sum, COEX
was not working. The California experience served to surface and enlighten
the maladies of stakeholder's Board. In several instances, we proposed a
professional Board and some form of ANEEL's intervention, as it had the
ultimate responsibility to have a functioning market. R

 ANEEL has reportedly taking our comments into account. Regulatory Affairs
is  proud to have influenced  this process. However, we think ANEEL should
have acted a long time ago. ANEEL now has a sense of urgency. It fully
understands that a non-functioning market would be an obstacle to anyone's
building new short term generation, on a merchant basis. This incremental
generation is key to mitigate the impact of rationing.

  No one doubts that ANEELs intervention was a "coup-de-etat". Legally
speaking, it is also questionable. ANEEL is backed by the Ministry of Energy
and by other Federally owned generations, who have many votes in the MAE.
Despite those deficiencies,  we believe the changes are in the right
direction.

 ANEEL has called Enron and asked for our  individual support as well as to
use our influence in the coalitions groups we are part of (ABRADEE, APINE,
CBIEE and ABRACEEL), to help mitigate the anger and help get the new Market
Agreement in place. Apparently ANEEL did not call any other private utility.
We explained ANEEL how delicate the situation is. The only way to proceed is
to shift the spotlight from the legal issues and try to focus on a new MAE
Agreement, to be signed by all parties. This would require ANEEL some
willingness to negotiate and compromise. They accepted our suggestion. We
have also expressed our view that ANEEL should not further interfere in the
MAE rules, spot pricing and contracts. Our support is contingent on the
integrity of market and contracts, even during a serious rationing. The
impending rationing indeed represents a temptation for the regulator to
further interfere, set caps on spot and the like.

 We have focused most of our effort in examining the three Resolutions and
proposing changes & improvements to be incorporated into a new MAE Agreement.
There are many aspects which need to be clarified/improved in the new
governance and structure as proposed by ANEEL. For example, the hierarchical
lines between ANEEL, COMAE, ANEEL, General Assembly and Board of ASMAE need
clarification. Similarly, the penalty rules need a lot of work to be ready to
be implemented.

 We have prepared several suggestions and we have circulated among industry
players, asking for inputs and feedback. No one is really focused on the new
MAE Agreement. Discussions are still very emotional at this point in time.
However, we feel that some progress has been made. Coalition groups  are not
talking about challenging the Resolution on legal grounds. This is unlikely
to happen on an individual basis. The situation is relatively  under control.

d) Next Steps

 Despite the progress in mitigating the initial anger, there is still a long
way to go. Our initial recommendations to improve the Resolutions,
distributed to industry players, should be technically discussed and agreed.
COMAE members should be appointed: ideally, utilities should agree on the
COMAE members specs, on a slate of candidates and on a process for final
COMAE members selection. Finally, a new MAE Agreement should be signed. None
of them are trivial tasks from a political standpoint.  ANEEL has established
a 60 day transitional period and a safety net if nothing happens: ANEEL
itself would choose the members and will maintain the Resolutions as they
are.

 We are also going to use ABRACEEL to lobby for COMAE seats (one or two) to
be appointed by traders. So far, this group has not been represented in the
COEX and in any other MAE formal or informal discussion groups.  We feel
traders are handicaped and that this is detrimental to the market as a whole
Distributors avoid retail competition while generators avoid wholesale
compatition. Collectively, they avoid competition and therefore the
implementation of the market. Traders are the only ones who strongly advocate
competition, on a genuine basis.

 All of this will keep Regulatory Affairs busy for the next months.


Dear Sally,

We have been preparing this information daily.  Until the end of the year,
either Nancy or I will send it to you.  The full blown exception reporting
will start the first week of January, including elevation of issues (so you
won't get it every day anymore) when Christy starts.  I also have a
contractor currently developing an Access database to capture all exception
reporting info.

For the past few days, I have been hoping to spend time following up on the
issues, not only in the deal capture arena, but in all reporting. Once the
markets calm down, I'll be able to do so.

Best regards

Shona

---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 12:07
PM ---------------------------

Nancy Hernandez@ECT
12/13/2000 10:36 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: consolidated Global Standards 12_1`2

Shona:

attached is the updated Global standards spreadsheet for Dec 12th.

Nancy


Kay:

Do you want to continue to hold off on the wire until the letter gets signed? FYI, Louise has given the OK to the wire.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	stephen.swift@ps.ge.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Mann, Kay; mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
Cc:	Jacoby, Ben; john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject:	RE: NorthWestern

Kay,

The letter looks fine.  Please address the letter to Jeff Darst 1 River Road
Building 36-3E Schenectady, 12345 with a copy to me.

Jeff's fax is 518-381-1513.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,

Steve Swift

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Swift, Stephen L (PS, CommOps); mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: NorthWestern

Gentlemen,

Pursuant to my discussion with Mr. Swift, I am enclosing a draft letter
for your review.

Kay

 <<Lttr to Steve re consent.DOC>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


- Cyberletter Ken Lay.doc


...includes column for "team"

 - EOTT TX NM Tks


Hello Vince:

My name is Fati Liamidi.  I work as an Associate in the URM group in EES.
I have come up with an value proposition which I think could make sense for
my group and wanted to run it by one of your colleagues to see if they could
help me out in terms of pricing.
Would you mind directing me toward somebody in your group who would be
willing to talk to me?  The idea involves options.

Thanks you very much in advance.

Fati Liamidi
3-4563


Good news.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2001 12:09
PM ---------------------------

"David Hunt" <drhunt@watervalley.net> on 06/07/2001 11:52:38 AM
Please respond to <drhunt@watervalley.net>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: <cpuasdmin@clarksdale.com>, <priest@yazoopsc.org>

Subject: RE: MDEA power contract/agency

The answer is yes but there will need to be contracts between MDEA and each
of the Cities.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:41 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net
Cc: wmontjoy@brunini.com
Subject: MDEA power contract/agency

David,

Is it possible for MDEA to purchase power from EPMI as an agent for the
Cities?  This will obviate the need for any type of security.

Thanks,

Kay


I have ceated deal 163005 to cover the flow for Feb

D

Jackie Young
02/04/2000 03:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-1534

Daren,

The above mentioned meter (delivery) shows a small flow of 24 dec. on
2-1-00.  The sitara deal (151694) has a stop date of 1/31/2000.

Can you please extend the deal thru 2-1-00 to cover this small volume?

Thanks
-Jackie-


David:  Hope you got back home alright!  I'll follow up if Shari is unable.
Also, did you tell me that you had a copy of some type of Australian
financial policy memo and/or trading guidelines for the Australian market?

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/11/2000 12:26 AM
To: Shari Stack@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement on behalf of Enron Australia Finance Pty
Limited

Shari, Westpac have contacted me re putting in place an ISDA with EAF. As far
as we ar concerned it will cover just power trades and commodities. A couple
of questions.

Our credit sheet required a MAC trigger (fall below BBB-) for additional
credit support. Was this changed? The ISDA Schedule Westpac sent me has no
such provision?
Can I have a copy of the Enron Corp.guaranty you finally settled with
Westpac?

 Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/11/2000 04:17 PM ---------------------------

mlindeman@westpac.com.au on 04/11/2000 03:16:02 PM
To: david.minns@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ISDA Master Agreement on behalf of Enron Australia Finance Pty
Limited

David,

Further to our telephone conversation, please find attached a draft copy of
the
Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement.  I have based this draft on the
recently
completed agreement between Westpac and Enron North America Corp and your
draft
sent to me in September last year.

I would be grateful if you could review this draft and advise me of any
comments
that you may have.  If you require a copy of the American Schedule, please let
me know and I will be happy to forward one to you.

As a  Guarantee is to be provided by Enron Corp, I would be grateful if you
could supply a copy of this document for our review.

Please do not hesitate to contact me on any  of the numbers below should you
have any questions.

Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to hearing from you very
shortly.

Regards

Margaret Lindeman
Documentation Administrator
Documentation Support, Markets
IB Legal
Direct Telephone:   9284 8671
Facsimile Number:   9283 1861
Email Address:      mlindeman@westpac.com.au

(See attached file: 3050 enron australia finance.doc)

 - 3050 enron australia finance.doc


EnronOnline
Trade Counts and Volume for April 17 th, 2001

			EXTERNAL		INTERNAL		TOTAL
COUNTRY	COMMODITY	CATEGORY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	UNIT OF MEASURE
Austria	Power	Physical	        16 	           37,028 	        -   	                   -   	        16 	           37,028 	MWh
Belgium	Natural Gas	Physical	        11 	         875,000 	        -   	                   -   	        11 	         875,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial	        17 	    13,043,000 	          4 	      2,295,000 	        21 	    15,338,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial Option	        -   	                   -   	          2 	      4,360,500 	          2 	      4,360,500 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Physical	      215 	      7,140,092 	          6 	      1,209,000 	      221 	      8,349,092 	MMBtu
Canada	Power	Financial	          1 	             1,860 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	             1,860 	MWh (Canada)
Denmark	Power	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          3 	           40,800 	          3 	           40,800 	MWh
Germany	Power	Physical	        60 	         754,763 	        -   	                   -   	        60 	         754,763 	MWh
Germany	Weather	Financial	          1 	                    1 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                    1 	Average Temperature
Norway	Power	Financial	          6 	         142,128 	        -   	                   -   	          6 	         142,128 	MWh
Singapore	Oil Products	Financial	          1 	             5,000 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	             5,000 	mt
Switzerland	Power	Physical	        19 	           10,150 	        -   	                   -   	        19 	           10,150 	MWh
United Kingdom	Crude	Financial	          9 	         690,000 	          1 	           25,000 	        10 	         715,000 	Barrel
United Kingdom	Metals	Financial	      336 	           15,981 	        37 	             1,275 	      373 	           17,256 	LME Registered mt Lot
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP	      230 	    46,728,200 	        -   	                   -   	      230 	    46,728,200 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP Option	          4 	      1,850,000 	        -   	                   -   	          4 	      1,850,000 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	          8 	           20,000 	        -   	                   -   	          8 	           20,000 	IPE mt
United Kingdom	Petchems	Financial	          1 	             1,000 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	             1,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Power	Physical	        22 	      1,733,280 	        -   	                   -   	        22 	      1,733,280 	MWh
USA	Crude	Financial	      140 	      6,660,000 	      107 	      4,520,000 	      247 	    11,180,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Financial Option	        13 	         650,000 	          3 	         150,000 	        16 	         800,000 	Barrel per month
USA	Crude	Physical	          6 	         961,000 	        -   	                   -   	          6 	         961,000 	Barrel per day
USA	LPG	Financial	          6 	         200,000 	        -   	                   -   	          6 	         200,000 	Gallon
USA	LPG	Physical	          1 	           15,000 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	           15,000 	Gallon
USA	Natural Gas	Financial	      935 	  327,230,046 	      606 	  244,566,576 	   1,541 	  571,796,622 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Financial Option	        19 	    16,600,000 	          3 	      3,000,000 	        22 	    19,600,000 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Physical	   1,765 	    19,274,436 	        57 	         755,332 	   1,822 	    20,029,768 	MMBtu
USA	Oil Products	Financial	        10 	         302,738 	          5 	             1,786 	        15 	         304,524 	Barrel
USA	Paper	Physical	          1 	                500 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                500 	Metric Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Paper	Physical	          1 	                250 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                250 	Short Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Power	Financial	        44 	         289,452 	        33 	         239,060 	        77 	         528,512 	MWh
USA	Power	Physical	      407 	      6,960,635 	      135 	      3,420,794 	      542 	    10,381,428 	MWh
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          3 	      4,300,000 	          3 	      4,300,000 	EUR/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          1 	         900,000 	          1 	         900,000 	GBP/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          1 	           32,258 	          1 	           32,258 	USD/1
			   4,305 		   1,007 		   5,312


Daren:
Per conversation with Ryan McGrath @ AEP in Ohio, he & Genaro Mendoza @
Enron are trying to settle 05/01 gas sales, netout. Per Ryan he is missing
3 sales deals (Sales to AEP by HPL or ENA ),  @ WAHA Hub, that he stated,
per his understanding, Genaro is not reflecting under ENA. The info that he
provided  re: the missing deals are as follows:
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.18 or   $33,022.00
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.09 or   $32,311.00
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.365 or $34,483.50

I checked with Julie Meyers, (see e-mail below), and she suggested that I
contact you. Can you help with this one? I don't reflect any 05/01 sales to
AEP in Unify.

Thanks!
Tess

----- Forwarded by Tessie N Ray/AEPIN on 06/25/01 07:24 AM -----

                    Julie L Meyers
                                         To:     Tessie N Ray/AEPIN@AEPIN
                    06/22/01 04:41       cc:
                    PM                   Subject:     Re: AEP is missing 3 deals for 05/01.(Document link: Tessie
                                         N Ray)

I would ask Daren Farmer at Enron.

Julie

Tessie N Ray
06/22/2001 04:14 PM

To:   Julie L Meyers/HO1/AEPIN@AEPIN
cc:   Genaro.Mendoza@enron.com, Charlene L Richmond/HO1/AEPIN@AEPIN

Subject:  AEP is missing 3 deals for 05/01.

Per conversation with Ryan McGrath @ AEP in Ohio, he & Genaro Mendoza @
Enron are trying to settle 05/01 gas sales, netout. Per Ryan he is missing
3 sales deals (Sales to AEP by HPL or ENA ),  @ WAHA Hub, that he stated,
per his understanding, Genaro is not reflecting under ENA. The info that he
provided  re: the missing deals are as follows:
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.18 or   $33,022.00
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.09 or   $32,311.00
   WAHA HUB, 7900 @ $4.365 or $34,483.50

Can you help with this one? I don't reflect any 05/01 sales to AEP in
Unify.

Thanks!
Tess


Have a wonderful holiday weekend.

JP


This will make your day!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           11/01/2000 10:26 AM

To: Barry.Belcher@PSS.boeing.com
cc: jadd202@aol.com, hghanley@aol.com, Jmcilvoy@houston.rr.com,
tshield@entergy.com, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT
Subject: Happy Halloween!

-
This one is too cute!

 - ATT19368.jpg


Teco Tap       20.000 / Enron ;  82.083 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


I need to have a CES counterparty set up in global please.

Customer Commonwealth Atlantic Limited Partnership (CALP)
  12500 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 200
  Fairfax, VA 22033-3804

I don't think CALP has assigned the contract to ENA.

I have a copy of the agreement if anyone needs to see it.

Thanks
Chris G 3-4743


The volume and complexity of our legal work has increased dramatically over
the past few years.  I think this environment requires additional time to be
devoted to legal planning and review in order to provide the best possible
service to our clients.  Within the next month, I have asked Janette to
schedule a Quarterly Legal Review for each group listed on our new
organizational chart .  I  would envision that we would focus on the
following:

review of the current monthly legal report and significant legal issues
review of the top ten legal risks
form contracts and other documentation projects
legal budget
legal resources, inside and outside
performance metrics

In addition, I am proposing that any energy trading contract for a term
longer than one year by initialled by an AGC or member of the OGC.  Let me
know what you think about that.

Mark Haedicke


FYI.  Please keep confidential until further notice.  Important to note that
this was delivered with the understanding that NO ONE has agreed to the
specific language.  It was a quick turn around (at Hertzberg's request) to
get the original, negotiated agreement into Legislative language (i.e.,
Martian) as soon as possible so that Hertzberg could try to move on it in the
Legislature as soon as possible.

In addition, the Commission is likely to come out with its proposed "rate
agreement" sometime this week, and is likely to release DWR's "revenue
requirement" next week.  I heard from the Gov's financial advisor that Edison
and DWR EACH want 2 cents out of the PUC's recent 3 cent rate increase.  It's
going to get very interesting from here.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001 04:11 PM -----

	"Simpson, Rick" <Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
	07/10/2001 04:12 PM

		 To: "'dhunter@s-k-w.com'" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Simpson, Rick"
<Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
		 cc: "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Dominic
DiMare (E-mail)'" <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail)'" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
<fieldejr@sce.com>, Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com, "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
<isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith
McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
<lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'" <lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'John
White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "Mike Kahl (E-mail)"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>
		 Subject: RE: Final Legislative Language

You all are awesome.  Many thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@s-k-w.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
Cc: 'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'; 'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'John Fielder (E-mail)'; Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com;
'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea
(E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'; 'John
White (E-mail)'; Ann.Cohn@sce.com; Mike Kahl (E-mail)
Subject: Final Legislative Language

Rick-
Attached please find our final draft of legislative language per your
request. We are ready and willing to draft other sections or language as
needed by you or the Speaker. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions about the draft. Please note there are disagreements over two
sections of language and they are so marked.

FYI - I will be sending this document out to the entire Working Group for
their information.

Thank you,
Delaney

 - FINAL Legislative Language.doc


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 08:12 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	05/29/2001 08:07 PM

		 To: ktycholiz@houston.rr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Agency Draft

Barry, For your review.


Effective March 1, 2001 Enron North America (CO 0413) employees will begin
using XMS (Expense Management System) to process employee expense
reimbursements.

XMS is a web based employee expense reimbursement system which will provide
the following benefits;

? More timely reimbursements to employees
? User friendly Web access
? Ability for employee or designated administrative assistant to submit
expense reimbursement
? Greater efficiency and lower cost
? Efficiently integrated with the current SAP accounting system

This system will REPLACE our current manual expense reimbursement process.
All employee expense reimbursements for ENA employees submitted after March
1, 2001 should be done via XMS.

Following are details regarding system access, training and support.

To access the system go to the Enron Home Page and type http://xms.enron.com
in the address field.

LOGON ID
Enter your personnel number (P number).   HR information is loaded
automatically into XMS, but an incomplete load may mean that some people's
IDs are not updated.  If your P number doesn't work, try using your first
initial and last name (lower case).  If you can't log in to the system, go to
the IT Central web page from the Enron home page and select Services>Security
Requests>eRequest or call (713) 853-5536.

PASSWORD
The first time you log in, the password is upper case ENRON.  The system will
guide you through confirming your personal information and changing your
password.  The Enron Code of Ethics prohibits the sharing of passwords and
logging on as another person.  Please observe Enron,s policy.  If you have
forgotten your password, call the Resolution Center at (713) 853-1411.

TRAINING
Go to the IT Central web page.  Select Services>Training.  Click on
"Schedules" in the North America column, and go to the XMS Workshop schedule
to choose your class.  If no classes are listed, call the training department
and place your request at (713) 853-1816.  Those in outlying locations and
those who prefer on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to isc.enron.com
and clicking on "training and education," then LEAP (shown as a link).  Use
xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.

DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page.
Select Services>Training. Click on "Documentation" in the North America
column and choose XMS User's Guide from the list.

APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Call the ISC help desk at (713) 345-4SAP (4727). Do not call Accounts Payable
with questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data.


Everything is going okay.  Dynegy has bought us out.  I think that if I was still in structuring then I might be worried, but I am trading natural gas options and the desk I work for has been very profitable.  I think that the natural gas and power trading floors are the main reason they bought us.  I would think they would like to keep things as they are on these desks, but you never know.  It will take 6-9 months before anything happens.

How are you doing?  I haven't heard from you in a while.  I would love to get together sometime.  My phone number is (713) 853-6247.  Call me sometime.

I guess you are working for Jeff Young now?  He used to be my boss.  How is the Europe group?  Are they still the same?  I am not for sure how your company is set up now.

How is married life?  Is you wife in the US now?  Are you still in DC?

Talk to you soon.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mattias Palm <Mattias.Palm@paconsulting.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 8:30 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	How's everything?

Hey John,

Been following the latest development of your firm. Hope everything turns
out well in the end.

Would be fun to meet up for a drink some time. I'm in Houston on a regular
basis.

Hope all is well

> Mattias Palm
> Principal Consultant
>
> PA
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20006

mattias.palm@paconsulting.com

202.442.2545              (office)
202.442.2001               (fax)
703.628.5684               (mobile)


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Williams/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000
07:59 AM ---------------------------

Charles T Muzzy
08/10/2000 03:58 PM
To: Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cora
Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darren Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark L
Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: Bike Road Rage!

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

"Webb, David" <WebbD@EPEnergy.com> on 08/10/2000 02:56:35 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: Bike Road Rage!

>
>
>  <<sportszeru biciklis.mpg>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - sportszeru biciklis.mpg


Sherri,

Our friends at the University of Texas are planning a conference on energy
economics and finance in February of next year. They would like very much to
have
Jeff Skilling as a keynote speaker.

Given our good, long-term  relationship with UT,  I would recommend
that Jeff speaks at this conference I talked to Prof. Ehud Ronn
a few times about this conference and  I think that this will be
an excellent forum to present Enron's accomplishments and
agenda for the future.

I shall send a separate message to Jeff about this request.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
11:35 AM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/20/2000 11:12:46 AM
To: rcausey@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince,

Good morning.

In my 9/14 e-mail, I advised you of the practitioner-industry CEFER (Center
for Energy Finance Education and Research) Conference we are planning for
Spring 2001.  As you know, we would like to invite Jeff Skilling to be the
keynote speaker at the Thur. evening dinner.  The following day's four
topics consist of Risk management, Deregulation, Real options, and
International/globalization.  The majority of invitees would be
(predominantly U. S.-based) energy-industry practitioners, as well as
several academics.

Given lead time issues in these matters, we have reserved hotel rooms in
Austin for Feb. 22, 2001.  Could I ask you to ascertain Jeff Skilling's
availability for that evening?

Thanks,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Enclosed is a form of hedge fund ISDA template.  I have blacklined it against
the Union Spring schedules.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Susan, Tana,

Could you please let Dee Travella at FUNB know the status of the Master
Agreement between ENA or ECTRC and FUNB. She has today received a schedule
for a Master Agreement between FUNB and Enron Credit.com. However, the credit
default swap traded with FUNB was done through ENA.

 I should be grateful for your assistance in this regard.

Many thanks,
Elaine Bannerman-Sowah
---------------------- Forwarded by Elaine Bannerman-Sowah/LON/ECT on
06/07/2000 18:48 ---------------------------

Elaine Bannerman-Sowah
29/06/2000 15:23
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: First Union National Bank - ISDA Master Agreement

Dear Tana,

 Could you please inform Dee Travella at FUNB of the status of the ECTRC
Master Agreement. I believe the FUNB Legal contact is  Lori Walsh.

Dee's number is 001 704 383 8778.

Many thanks,

Elaine Bannerman-Sowah

Phone : 020 7783 4923
Fax: 020 7783 4907.


An update on Locke Liddell's activities with Ecogas.
Received: from bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ([172.16.1.17]) by po.bracepatt.com;
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:28:54 -0600
Received: FROM mail2.lockeliddell.com BY bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ; Mon Feb 21
09:32:07 2000
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected by CyberGuard
Received: from daex01.lockeliddell.com (daex01.lockeliddell.com [10.8.2.50])
by mail2.lockeliddell.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09252; Mon, 21 Feb
2000 09:33:05 -0600
Received: by daex01.lockeliddell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
id <FCXPV5V7>; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:32:47 -0600
Message-ID:
<A1B4C8FB2C95D211A5A90008C7F4872401C443D5@houex01.lockeliddell.com>
From: "Pieringer, Stan" <SPieringer@lockeliddell.com>
To: "'rstephens@bracepatt.com'" <rstephens@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "'jerrel@rmisp.com'" <jerrel@rmisp.com>
Subject: Ecogas misc.
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:15:24 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

            Rob, I have  heard nothing from DTE Biomass since I sent them
the schedule to the proposed MOU January 21.   I had previously sent it to
them January 6.    In fact, I haven't heard anything from them since they
got our money before Christmas.   I will follow up in the next few days
unless there has been some development I don't know about.

            Also, wanted to report that we were asked to help with a $5,000
writ of execution on Ecogas property in Austin.   Some suit in JP Court in
Travis County over a debt by the Company's former subsidiary Ecogas
Cryogenics Inc. in Washington state.  The Company answered without counsel
but then apparently forgot about it.  The constable was at the door when we
got the call on Thursday.  We are in touch trying to work it out.

Regards,

            Stan Pieringer
            Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
            600 Travis Street, 35th Floor
            Houston, Texas 77002
            voice: 713/226-1224
            fax: 713/223-3717
            spieringer@lockeliddell.com <mailto:spieringer@lockeliddell.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------

Dick Jenkins
03/02/2000 05:12 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: AGL

we need to determine if he will be the point person.  need to check with
scott, but it appears that someone should attend.


FYI, I am attaching the current term sheet for the Rio Gen EPC contract which
is has been approved by AA and I believe Global Finance.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 01:05
PM ---------------------------
From: Mary Cilia on 10/03/2000 03:54 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EPC Term Sheet

 - 38178_8.doc


Frank Quebbemann
1300 Alton Rd 4-D
Miami Beach, FL 33139
fquebbemann@the-beach.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Frank Quebbemann


FYI: the Real Time portion of these information sessions has been rescheduled
for 2:00pm in Mt. Hood.

---------------------- Forwarded by Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT on 03/23/2001
12:29 PM ---------------------------

Amy FitzPatrick
03/23/2001 10:11 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Portland Job Opportunities

JUST A REMINDER ABOUT THE BELOW INFO SESSIONS FOR TODAY!!!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT on 03/23/2001
12:18 PM ---------------------------

Amy FitzPatrick
03/22/2001 02:47 PM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Portland Job Opportunities

Listed below are several positions which may become available over the next
several months in the Portland office.  We will be holding information
sessions on Friday, 3/23 in Mt Hood.  Listed below are details regarding the
time of the information session, position, department and hiring manager.

Time Position   Department   Hiring Manager
10:00 Senior Specialist  Fundamentals Analysis  Tim Heizenrader
10:30 Specialist/Analyst  Real Time   Bill Williams III
11:00 Specialist/Senior Specialist Volume Management  Chris Stokley
12:00   Research Analyst  Renewable Power Desk Elliot Mainzer
2:30  Power Prescheduler  Scheduling   Cara Semperger

Please feel free to attend any of these sessions to learn more about the
available opportunities.

Attached are more detailed descriptions of the above mentioned positions.  We
will be considering internal candidates as well as external candidates for
the above positions.  If you are interested, please let Amy FitzPatrick know
no later than close of business Wednesday, March 28, 2001.


Attached is the ESP definition taken from the commodities regulations.


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.

       louis.eber@ubsw.com


Gary:

HPL received  volumes at the above meter during 1/1/99 thru 6/99.  Prior to
1/1/99, ENA was purchasing some of the volumes from I P Petroleum under
contract #016-44386-102; Deal #341832.   This deal expired 12/31/99, but the
volumes continued to flow and be allocated to I P Petroleum by Pioneer.
Since there was no deal to cover these volumes, these volumes were allocated
to HPL Strangers Gas Contract.

Volume Mgmt had previously requested a deal to cover these volumes from
someone, but never received one.

Here are the months and volumes that need resolution:

Prod. Mth Mmbtus
Jan. 99    6,510
Feb. 99    6,395
Mar. 99  14,789
Apr. 99  16,866
May. 99    8,415
Jun.  99  13,858

Total  66,833

Possible Solution:

1.  Need a Deal to cover the periods in question, or
2.  Provide authorization to writeoff the volumes.  (Print & return original
to Clem Cernosek)

 APPROVAL to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

PS:   My understanding is that neither  I P Petroleum nor Pioneer have
addressed any issues concerning these volumes.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:46 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Calcagno, Suzanne
Subject:	FW: Dynegy Promotes Matt Schatzman to President and CEO of Energy	 Convergence Business

Another big promo for Matt.  The guy can't be stopped!	ii

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Helburg, Charles J
> Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:28 AM
> To:	Alatorre, Hector; Catlett, Laurie; Dees, Debra; Gensler, Quentin;
> Heiser, Suzanne; Hungate, Cynthia; Immer, Ingrid; McBeath, K Mark; Monley,
> John; Payne, Leon; Prodoehl, Paul; Ramos, J Linda; Rush, Russell; Sansom,
> William; Shaull, Barbara; Smith, Elsie; Taylor, Janice; Walleck, Lynn
> Subject:	FW: Dynegy Promotes Matt Schatzman to President and CEO of
> Energy Convergence Business
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Prodoehl, Paul J
> Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:50 AM
> To:	Catlett, Laurie E; Heiser, Suzanne J; Egner III, Paul F; Helburg,
> Charles J; Payne, Leon M; Ezernack, Diane L; Douglass, M Clay
> Subject:	Dynegy Promotes Matt Schatzman to President and CEO of
> Energy Convergence Business
>
> Breaking News FYI...
>
> Wednesday January 16, 10:54 am Eastern Time
> Press Release
> SOURCE: Dynegy Inc.
>
> Dynegy Promotes Matt Schatzman to President and CEO of Energy Convergence
> Business
>
> HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 16, 2002--Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN - news)
> today announced that Matt K. Schatzman, previously president of Energy
> Trading, has been promoted to president and chief executive officer of the
> company's energy convergence business. In this capacity, Schatzman will
> add energy marketing and origination, commercial asset management,
> operations and development of Dynegy's U.S. generation facilities, and
> Dynegy Canada to his current responsibilities, which include all energy
> transportation, logistics and risk management activities. He will continue
> to report to Dynegy Inc. President and Chief Operating Officer Steve
> Bergstrom.
>
> Schatzman joined Dynegy in 1990 as director of Transportation after
> spending three years at Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. He served in
> positions of increasing responsibility in the gas marketing and trading
> fields and was promoted to vice president in 1992. In 1996, he was named
> vice president of Trading and Operations for Dynegy's power marketing
> subsidiary and subsequently was promoted to vice president and general
> manager in April 1997. From April 1998 until August 1999, Schatzman served
> as executive vice president, Marketing and Origination, where his
> responsibilities included oversight of all long-term marketing and
> origination in gas and power throughout the United States as well as
> oversight over Dynegy's retail operations.
>
> Cliff Hare, formerly senior vice president of Marketing and Origination
> for the Southeast, has been promoted and will replace Schatzman as
> president of Energy Trading. After spending 10 years with Southern Natural
> Gas Co., Hare joined Natural Gas Clearinghouse, Dynegy's predecessor
> company, in 1987 and has served in various departments within the company,
> including transportation, gas trading, power fuel and gas and power
> marketing. He will relocate to Dynegy's Houston headquarters and will
> report to Schatzman.
>
> Dynegy Inc. is one of the world's premier energy merchants. Through its
> global energy delivery network and marketing, logistics and risk
> management capabilities, Dynegy provides innovative solutions to customers
> in North America, the United Kingdom and Continental Europe. The company's
> website is www.dynegy.com.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Contact:
>
>      Dynegy Inc., Houston
>      Media:
>      John Sousa or Steve Stengel, 713/767-5800
>      or
>      Analysts:
>      Margaret Nollen, Arthur Shannon
>       or Katie Pipkin, 713/507-6466


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001 05:31 PM -----

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/09/2001 05:22 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-09-01

Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


dinking, i will meet you around 2:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

that's not acceptable.  come play now.  ok so where can laura and i go?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i have to go back into lavo's office in a few minutes, then i have to go to lunch with john and one of our research guys from chicago, i will be back around 1:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

come down here and visit me


Please attached!


Dear everyone,

We understand the as members of Enron Research group, all of us are working
on very interesting projects, some of which are ground-breaking, and we all
keep a very keen mind on any development of new technology.  We also find
out, through our own experience, that at this age of information explosion,
it becomes more and more difficult to have enough time and energy to keep
abreast with most of the exciting stuff taking place in this department, let
alone in the industry.  It is also our personal experience that many a
project we are working on has partially been attempted by other members of
this group.

As a remedy, we propose that the research group start an informal brown bag
lunch group meeting, once every two weeks on Friday, for about 50 minutes.
It is hoped that it will provide a forum for us to facilitate with new
technology and development, as well as with each other,s work, so that we do
not have to reinvent the wheels.

We envision the following: In this meeting (or seminar), each one of us will
take turns to make presentations to the group. The topics could range from
theoretical consideration to practical implementation, be it option pricing,
process modelling, insurance issue, or Monte Carlo simulation, or anything
one finds fascinating.  The presentation material could be papers you have
been reading recently, projects you are working on,  some problem that
bothers you, or an idea that is fascinating. You  choose your own
presentation style.  It could be
everything-you-always-wanted-to-know-but-were-afraid-to-ask, hand waving
style, or it can involve nitty-gritty, detailed derivations, anyway a style
that suits you and the topic.  Or it can simply be a dry-run for your
presentation at the next Risk Conference.  Zimin and Alex will take upon the
responsibility of organizing the seminar.

We hope the seminar will be up and running in two-three weeks. For that
purpose your support will be greatly appreciated. Please let either Zimin or
Alex know if you are interested in giving a presentation to the group and
provide a tentative schedule. Surely the rest of the group will be happy to
hear your presentation.

We encourage everyone to participate this brown bag meeting, either to give a
talk or just sit in.

Zimin Lu
Alex Huang


----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 01/04/2001 09:46 AM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	01/04/2001 09:32 AM

		 To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Microsoft

Bias Suit Against Microsoft Aims at `Flat' Workplace Hierarchies
By Yochi J. Dreazen and Jess Bravin
Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal

01/04/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A10
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

The lawyers pursuing a racial discrimination lawsuit against Microsoft Corp.
are gearing up to put merit pay and other cherished tenets of the New Economy
workplace on trial before both a jury and the court of public opinion.
The suit, which was filed yesterday in federal court in Washington, D.C.,
seeks class-action status on behalf of hundreds of current and former black
employees of the Redmond, Wash., software giant. The plaintiffs, a group of
seven current and former Microsoft employees, accuse the company of racial
discrimination with regard to promotions and compensation, and also allege
that Microsoft wrongfully terminated some of its black employees. The suit
asks for at least $5 billion of compensatory and punitive damages.
"They have a plantation-type mentality when it comes to the treatment of
African-American employees at the company," said Willie Gary, the
high-profile plaintiffs' attorney bringing the suit, who also is involved in
a similar case against Coca-Cola Co. "It borders on corporate slavery."
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer said he couldn't comment on the
specifics of the suit, but said, "We have a fairly strong track record of not
tolerating discrimination in any of our employment practices."
The 66-page complaint takes issue with otherwise ordinary interactions among
Microsoft employees, in contrast with some recent discrimination suits
against other big corporations that featured accusations of abusive language
toward black employees and of racist office displays, including nooses and
swastikas.
The suit alleges that some of the most widely replicated aspects of a New
Economy workplace -- "flat" corporate hierarchies where workers can bypass
managers and merit pay that isn't tied to an employee's seniority -- allowed
Microsoft to systematically discriminate against its African-American
employees.
The suit amends an existing action filed on behalf of Rahn Jackson, an
eight-year veteran of Microsoft's Washington, D.C., office who had led a team
of employees selling software to the U.S. military. Mr. Jackson claims that
despite receiving solid scores on performance reviews, he repeatedly was
passed over for promotions that went to white employees. Mr. Jackson has
since left Microsoft, and now handles corporate sales for one of the
company's biggest competitors, Sun Microsystems Inc., of Palo Alto, Calif.
The case could foreshadow a wave of similar claims against other
high-technology companies, especially if the sector sheds thousands of
workers amid the slowing economy.
John C. Fox, who heads the employment-law practice at Palo Alto's Fenwick &
West, said his law firm has spent weeks readying layoff plans for Silicon
Valley companies, which are preparing for a major round of cuts slated for
Monday. He declined to name the companies.
But whenever there are layoffs, lawsuits inevitably follow, Mr. Fox said.
"There will be a lot of discrimination claims. You can bet your bottom dollar
on that," he said. He predicted, though, that because there are relatively
few minorities working in Silicon Valley, most discrimination claims will
come from white male workers more than 40 years old -- who are protected by
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
The Jackson suit against Microsoft focuses on the fact that at many
companies, including Microsoft, managers are asked to grade their employees,
with the scores used in awarding promotions, stock options and pay raises.
Many younger employees cherish such systems, which allow skilled but
relatively inexperienced workers to get paid more and rise faster than they
would have under a traditional seniority system. The subjective nature of
such evaluations, however, could permit managers to discriminate against
employees because of their race (or age or sex), as the plaintiffs in the
Microsoft case allege.
Indeed, Mr. Jackson said in an interview that he and other black employees
were being paid less than a third as much as comparably situated white
employees and received fewer stock options. Microsoft denies black employees
were routinely paid less than their white counterparts, though it refused to
specifically address the suit, saying personnel matters are confidential.
The suit also highlights the potential for controversy that exists when
companies enact "flat" hierarchies designed to allow junior employees to
freely interact with senior managers as a way to increase productivity and
tear down barriers between workers. Mr. Jackson's suit, for instance, accuses
Microsoft of fostering a hostile work environment by allowing a junior white
employee to publicly challenge and defy him, and to bypass him in the
office's formal chain of command.
Microsoft's Mr. Ballmer, however, insisted his company has "worked very hard
to promote minority and women employees," despite having to contend with a
general shortage of engineering talent in the software industry. Microsoft
has invested more than $100 million in initiatives to stimulate interest in
science and technology among women and minorities, he noted.
---
Rebecca Buckman contributed to this article.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Business/Financial Desk; Section C
TECHNOLOGY
New Bias Lawsuit Is Filed Against Microsoft
By The New York Times

01/04/2001
The New York Times
Page 4, Column 3
c. 2001 New York Times Company

WASHINGTON, Jan. 3 -- Seven former and current employees of the Microsoft
Corporation filed a lawsuit today contending that the company had engaged in
racial discrimination in its employment practices, and seeking certification
as a class action on behalf of all former and current black Microsoft
employees.
The suit, filed in federal district court here, builds on a discrimination
suit brought in June by Rahn D. Jackson, a former account executive for
Microsoft. Mr. Jackson's complaint was refiled today to include the six other
plaiontiffs.
Mr. Jackson said today at a news conference here that he had raised his
concerns with Microsoft before filing his suit, but that he received little
response.
''We really didn't want to have to be here today,'' he said.
The plaintiffs are four former employees from Microsoft's office in the
District of Columbia and two former and one current employee at its
headquarters in Redmond, Wash.
The case is scheduled to be heard by Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who
presided over the government's antitrust case against Microsoft and ordered
the company to be split into two parts. Microsoft, which is appealing, has
argued that Judge Jackson committed substantive errors in the antitrust case.
Deborah Willingham, vice president for human resources at Microsoft, said the
company was ''100 percent committed to diversity.'' She declined to comment
on the specific complaint because she had not reviewed it.
Willie E. Gary, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said at the news conference that
Microsoft discriminated against black employees in evaluations, compensation,
promotions and termination.
''There are glass ceilings and glass walls in place for African- Americans at
Microsoft,'' he said.
Mr. Gary, who won a bias lawsuit against the Walt Disney Company last year,
also represents four plaintiffs in a pending discrimination suit against the
Coca-Cola Company.
Mr. Gary presented employment figures that he said supported the complaint.
In 1999, 2.6 percent of the company's employees were black, Mr. Gary said,
and of the company's managers, just 1.6 percent were black. Mr. Gary said
that he gathered the figures by speaking to Microsoft employees and from
internal company documents.
Ms. Willingham said that ''Microsoft has a zero-tolerance policy toward
discrimination in the workplace.'' She added that, ''We take any allegations
of discrimination very seriously, and immediately investigate any concern
that is raised.''
A company spokeswoman said that 2.7 percent of Microsoft's domestic work
force of 27,249 was black and that in the last three years, there had been an
81 percent increase in the number of black employees. The percentage of all
minority employees at the company has risen from 16.8 percent in 1997 to
about 22 percent of the domestic work force today, she said.
This is not the only lawsuit contending racial bias at Microsoft. In October,
Monique Donaldson, a former program manager for Microsoft, filed a lawsuit
against the company claiming racial and gender bias; that lawsuit is pending
in federal district court in Seattle.
And Peter Browne, who had been Microsoft's highest-ranking black executive
before leaving the company in September, filed a discrimination lawsuit
shortly after his departure.

Photo: Rahn Jackson is one of the plaintiffs in a suit against Microsoft.
(Associated Press)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Hi John,

I'm out of town, but will give this a look when I return.

Kay

j.nassos@pecorp.com on 01/30/2001 05:16:08 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Gregg.Penman@enron.com, t.hermann@pecorp.com, r.dobson@pecorp.com

Subject: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate

Hello Kay -

It's been a long time since we've last spoken and I hope things are well.
In November, Gregg Penman had sent me two confidentiality agreements related
to enovate and asked that I forward any comments to you directly.  I finally
have reviewed them and have a couple comments.

The only proposed changes that need explanation are in paragraphs 1 and 3 of
each agreement.  Paragraphs 1 and 3 are typical provisions in a
confidentiality agreement where each side is evaluating a transaction.
However, the confidential information disclosed under these particular
agreements is going to be used not only for trading activities but also in
connection with audit rights related to an existing and ongoing contractual
relationship.  The confidentiality agreements should not affect enovate's
and PMW's rights under the LLC Agreement.  Accordingly, the proposed changes
are my attempt to clarify the usual text.

Please call if you wish to discuss.  I believe my procrastination has
resulted in the business people wanting to sign these up next week, so your
attention to this is appreciated.  Thanks.

 <<Conf Ag enovate L.L.C. (evaluation of enovate LLC) v1 ENOVATE CMTS
MRK.doc>>  <<Conf Ag Peoples Energy Resources Corp. (evaluation of enovate
LLC) revision 3 PEC CMTS.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Conf Ag enovate L.L.C. (evaluation of enovate LLC) v1 ENOVATE CMTS MRK.doc
 - Conf Ag Peoples Energy Resources Corp. (evaluation of enovate LLC)
revision 3 PEC CMTS.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 04:09 PM
---------------------------

Scott Neal
10/05/2000 01:41 PM
To: sneal12@mindspring.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Montana Forest Fire picture

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 01:41 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Andrea Ring                           10/05/2000 01:12 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Montana Forest Fire picture

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                10/02/2000 02:04 PM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: FW: Montana Forest Fire picture

Subj:    Montana Forest Fire picture
This is awsome and at the same time rather chilling.  Mother nature is
spectacular
This awesome picture was taken in the Bitterroot National Forest here in
Montana on August 6, 2000 by a fire behavior analyst from Fairbanks,
Alaska by the name of John McColgan with a Digital camera.  Since he was
working while he took the picture, he cannot sell or profit from it so he
should
at least be recognized as the photographer of this once in a lifetime
shot

 - ATT09176.jpg


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042619.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Brant:

Please call me or schedule time to discuss Bridgeline ("CP").  In particular,
you should note the following:

(1)  CP requests cross default with US 100 million for ENA and US 20 million
for itself.
(2)  Change in ownership as default trigger is different from your proposal.
(3)  CP requests US 15 million Enron Corp. guaranty and increases its
guaranty cap to US 15 million
(4)  Docs to be delivered:  ONLY CP's guarantor to deliver annual
unaudited/quarterly unaudited consolidated financials
(5)  Review setoff (elimination of affiliates)
(6)  Review transfer because CP has a proposal for ENA
(7)  Change to collateral thresholds - bilateral US 15 million

Also, I think Susan verified with you that you did not intend to use a
non-specific MAC (even though the credit worksheet is marked as such).

I'll wait to hear from you.

Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 11:48 AM -----

	"Peters, Jason" <jasonpeters@akllp.com>
	12/08/2000 03:05 PM

		 To: <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: <trevor.mihalik@bhlp.com>, <brant.reves@enron.com>
		 Subject: Schedule to Master Agreement - Bridgeline/ENA

  Sara,

Attached for your review, please find a blacklined copy of the
above-referenced Agreement marked to show our requested changes to the
draft prepared by ENA in March.  Please call me at 713-220-4124 with any
comments or questions.

Thanks,

Jason
 <<Blackline 594071.2 vs. .1 Schedule to Master Agreement -
Bridgeline.DOC>>
 - Blackline 594071.2 vs. .1 Schedule to Master Agreement - Bridgeline.DOC


Yes, the correct name does include "Inc." at the end. And yes, Steve Hall
said the master agreement works for this trade. He and Bob Ellery at Sierra
talked over the agreement and decided to use the name that Sierra Pacific
Holding Co. is doing business under. I've changed the deal (573679) in
EnPower. Please let me know if you turn up any more questions.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/12/2001 06:52 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Holding Co.

Hello, Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. is a choice in Enpower.  Is this the
correct name with the "Inc." on it?  I am assuming that Steve Hall said it is
OK to use the master agreement for this trade.

Thanks,
Melissa

   Kate Symes                04/11/2001 07:38 PM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Request for New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Holding Co.

Regarding the deal Chris Foster did on 4/6 with Sierra Pacific Holding Co. -

Bob Ellery, Sierra's Director of Energy Resources, and Steve Hall, one of
Portland's most expeditious lawyers, have decided to execute the deal under
the designation Sierra Pacific Industries, which is also named in the master
agreement. We still, however, need this name added to the counterparty list
in EnPower.

Thank you all for your help on this, and I appreciate your future assistance
in getting this deal out of the "New Counterparty" void.

Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


I'll get to this later today.   Call if you have immediate issues.  Sara

	"Ho, Wendy" <who@velaw.com>
	06/08/2000 05:15 PM

		 To: "Shackleton, Sara (Enron)" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Project PATS

Hi Sara,

Gareth and I were going over the documents this morning and was wondering if
you have any comments on the revised Swaps (the three currency swaps and the
two option swaps).  Could you fax me your comments?

Could you also forward to me the Master Agreement btw UBS and Enron and
Enron's std language with respect to set offs, jurisdiction etc.. (as per
your e-mail two weeks ago).  Thanks.

Wendy Ho
Vinson & Elkins
1001 Fannin St. Suite 2300
Houston, TX 77002
tel: 713-758-3895
fax: 713-615-5849


Excellent work.  Thanks for the update.

Jeff

Robert Johnston
01/11/2001 12:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rommel Aganon/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Brazil coffee estimate: latest @35mm

After weeks of media reports and official Brazilian govt forecasts of a 25-27
million bag crop, we are finally getting to the real likely crop figure of 35
million bags, which we forecast in mid-November  (see report below the Dow
story).  I believe that this is the kind of information that can be a real
winner for the EGM Agricultural traders by clarifying the confusing and
misleading reports from Brazilian official sources.

RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rommel Aganon @ ENRON                           01/11/2001 10:19 AM

To: Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Brazil coffee estimate: latest @35mm

Robert, we hit another one on the head.

-- DJ MARKET TALK: Brazil 01-02 Coffee Crop Seen Near 35M Bags --

  Contact us in London on 44-20-7842-9358 or in New York on 201-938-4435.

  1614 GMT (Dow Jones) Brazil 01-02 crop seen in 35 million bag range, says
trader. However, much too early to put a firm figure on it with possibility of
weather, other upsets, he adds. (CHH)

Confidential
                               Enron North America Competitive Analysis
 & Business Controls

TO:  Gary Hickerson
FROM: Robert Johnston
CC:  Erin Willis, Elsa Piekielniak, Vince Kaminski, Scott Tholan
RE:  Brazilian Coffee Crop Forecast
DATE:  06 November 2000

1. 2000-2001 Crop

This crop flowered from September 1999 to January 2000 and was harvested from
April 2000 to November 2000. The peak of the harvest occurred in June/July.
The 2000-2001 crop is currently being exported, and exports from the crop
will continue into the first half of 2001.  The consensus from our sources is
that this crop will be bigger than expected and total 32-33 million bags.
Brazil,s Ministry of Agriculture (Embrapa) is expected to release an official
total in the next 10 days, which may or may not be accurate.  The most recent
government forecast called for 28.9 million bags.  Growers have been issuing
similarly lower crop yield estimates for 2000-2001 as a way of calling
attention to a probable bad harvest and pressuring the government to provide
more generous financing subsidies.

The current dry weather impacts the 2001-2002 crop, not the 2000-2001 crop,
which is largely harvested.  Crop receipts issued by cooperatives in Brazil
are 11 percent greater than they were in 1999-2000.   Our top source in
London believes that the 2000-2001 crop has been largely discounted by the
market and that the focus should be on 2001-2002.

2. 2001-2002 Crop

This is the crop that should be currently flowering in Brazil, but was
impacted by the June frost and the October dry weather.  The harvest for the
2001-2002 crop will run from April 2001 to November 2001 and will be exported
in the second half of 2001 and in the first half of 2002.  The Brazilian
government is likely to release its 2001-2002 forecast in December or January
2001.  The 1999 plantings garnered expectations of a 2001-2002 crop yield of
44-46 million bags.  However, recent weather problems have caused a
significant downgrade of this forecast to between 33 and 40 million bags.

Other sources in contact with coffee growers in Brazil report the potential
for even greater damage to the 2001-2002 crop, in the range of up to a 50
percent drop, or 22-23 million bags.  Agronomists from Cooxupe, the largest
coffee cooperative in Brazil, have already pegged their first estimate at
27.8 million bags.  Again, however, it is critical to remember that growers
tend to exaggerate weather damage, which is then further exacerbated by
market rumors.  As evidence, dry weather in the spring (Sept-Dec in Brazil)
of 1999 caused alarm regarding the 2000-2001 crop.  Even though the dry
weather did not end until December 1999, there was still time for flowering,
which caused many market watchers to upgrade their forecasts.

While analysts and growers agree that the highly irregular status of the
coffee trees makes the 2001/2002 crop one of the most difficult to evaluate,
the occurrence of average to normal rainfall will greatly sharpen crop
forecasting efforts.  It is most critical for the rest of November and
December.  Recent rains since the last week of October have begun to address
the hydrological deficit in the soil.  Continued, steady, well-dispersed
rains will help offset losses, but estimated irreversible damage to the
expected yield of 44-46 million bags from frost and dry weather to date will
be a minimum of 15 percent, making the new yield forecast no greater than
38-40 million bags.  A shortage of significant rainfall between now and the
end of December could bring yield down to a 30 percent loss from the
forecast, in the range of 33-36 million bags.

Rain is particularly significant because the new planting in recent years has
been concentrated in the Cerrado (savannah) region of Northern Brazil.  The
coffee can be mechanically harvested in this region, but requires significant
irrigation.  The irrigation alone will only partially offset the dry
weather.

The frost damage from June 2000 accounts for a 75 percent crop loss in Parana
and a 20 percent crop loss in Sao Paulo, but these states only account for 20
percent of total Brazilian production.  In Minas Gerais (almost 60 percent of
production), the crop losses are only 10 percent.  Crop losses in Espiritu
Santo, which accounts for 10 percent of production, have been negligible.

Our sources will monitor rainfall and flowering/cherry formation on the
coffee trees, which must occur by January 2001.  The recent rainfall is
viewed as promising and supports our basis for a 33 million bag estimate.


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041115.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:   2.28 / Final:   2.27)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:50 PM ---------------------------

"Sumanto Basu" <BasuS@arentfox.com> on 07/07/2000 04:40:32 PM
To: <Daniel.R.Rogers@enron.com>, <Nancy.Corbet@enron.com>,
<Todd.Peterson@enron.com>
cc: "Michael Kurman" <KurmanM@arentfox.com>, "Eugene A. Massey"
<MasseyE@arentfox.com>

Subject: Draft reponse to COU letter (1st point)

At Gene Massey's request please find attached a draft response to the first
point of the COU letter from Cabot.

 - COU-EAMletter1.doc


Given the negativity toward Enron at the CPUC, should we not file comments if
these express our position?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mara, Susan
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Cc: Kean, Steven; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James; Kingerski, Harry; Sharp,
Vicki; Curry, Wanda; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: AReM/WPTF Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct
Access

Dan Douglass has drafted joint comments for two coalitions in which Enron is
a member -- Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Western Power Trading
Forum.  Robert, feel free to contact Dan directly with your comments.  Let me
know your thoughts as well.  I am out of the office at a WPTF meeting. Dan is
here as well. If you need to contact me, you can leave me a message on my
office phone or try my cell (415 -- 902-4108), but I'm not sure the cell is
working all the time.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:35 AM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com> 06/20/2001 10:59 PM 	   To: "ARM"
<arem@electric.com>  cc:   Subject: Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX
Credit and Direct Access

Attached for your review and comment is my first draft of comments to be
filed on Monday with regard to the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and
Commissioner Bilas.  Please review it carefully, as I have thrown in
everything I can think of on a rush basis, and it may require some
significant  editing.  Pay particular attention to Section V dealing with
Bilas' request  for parties to discuss alternatives to DA suspension.  The
draft offers a  compromise to the DWR's concerns, as expressed in the
Angelides memo.   Also, notice that Section VI urges the Commission to
bifurcate the DA and PX  credit issues, acting quickly on the first, if it
must, but more leisurely on  the PX credit subject.

Finally, I have a suggestion in the form of a question.  How  would AReM
members feel about making this a joint filing with WPTF?  There  is
cross-membership between the two groups and the same issues would be raised
in the separate filings which I am otherwise prepared to draft.  This draft
would requires some modifications so as to refer to the "Joint Parties" as
opposed to solely mentioning AReM, and I might  add a section dealing more
explicitly with WPTF's contribution to getting the zero minimum bill
stipulation  signed in the first place.  Otherwise, the document would stay
much as it  is (subject to your input over the next few days, of course).
Please let  me know what you think asap, as I am already working on a WPTF
draft.   Incidentally, I will also be filing comments on behalf of ABAG which
will  support the positions taken in the attached document, but I am not
proposing  that ABAG also be a party to this filing.  Thanks for your help!
Comments as soon as possible would be very much appreciated!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite  244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:   (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com << File: file://C:\Program Files\Common
Files\Microsoft Shared\Stationery">
<STYLE>BODY {
 MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000;
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
 MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc;
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com >>

 - Blank Bkgrd.gif << File: Blank Bkgrd.gif >>
 - 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft 1.doc << File: 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft
1.doc >>


Hi Mark,

Boy, I'm missing you and Janette!

 I wanted to drop you an email to get more information on Greg's talk at your conference on 10/12.  I believe he's going to address your group on business updates.  Are there particulars you wish for him to cover?  How long is he speaking and at what time?  Do you wants slides?  Will there be a Q&A and if yes, any thoughts on what people will be asking?

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley
Office of the Chairman
Enron Corporation
Tel.   713.853.1935
Fax   713.853.1838


I am Robert Aicher's secretary.  I am updating his rolodex regarding the
Loan and Security Agreement among ABN Bank, ABN and ENA.   The fax I have
is slightly blurred, so I apologize; please confirm the following:

Sara Shackleton   sshackl@enron.com
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7661

Gen:  713-853-6161
Dir:     713-853-6620
Fax:    713-646-8490    (??)

PO Box 1188
Houston, TX  77251-1188


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041813.txt


Julie,

Sorry for the delay. I was traveling a lot the last few days.
I shall send back my comments by Saturday morning my time.

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> on 10/13/2000 04:34:17 AM
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "LC" <les@lacimagroup.com>, "chris" <chris@lacimagroup.com>
Subject: EPRM

Vince,
?
Could you please provide me with an indication on whether you  will be able
to review the latest EPRM article in the next day or so??
?
Look forward to hearing from you shortly.
?
Julie


Attached are five flyers from the California Independent Energy Producers
providing information about the California power issue.


Do you know that Enron is committed to providing procurement opportunities to
minority and women-owned business enterprises?  Do you know how it works?
Ask Calvin Eakins, director of Minority & Women Business Development about
his group's goals for 2001.  Tuesday, July 10 on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston
time.

Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question.  Calvin will try to answer it during his event and you can read the
transcript later.

How do you feel about Enron's cost savings initiatives? Have you thought of
some innovative ways to save money?  Talk amongst yourselves in eMeet
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf .

This week's ideas deposited into the Idea Vault include such interesting
concepts as California time-of-day remote metering via broadband and prepaid
gas cards.  Go to the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage)
for all the details.


Reservation status has changed to RECEIVED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30937
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS3
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/23/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/23/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/21/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/21/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = FOR INFO CALL (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001
01:26 PM ---------------------------

Don Baughman@ECT
05/16/2001 11:08 AM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry F
Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan
Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mauricio
Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dustin
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Girls = Evil

 - GirlsEvil.jpg