Kay,  can you forward the most current PPA to Allyson?

Thanks,
Reagan

---------------------- Forwarded by Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron on 09/14/2000
05:54 PM ---------------------------

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 09/14/2000 03:37:51 PM
To: "'Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com'" <Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com>, "'Chapman
Tom'" <tom.chapman@enron.com>, "'Mann Kay'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Kroll
Heather'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>, "'Keenan Jeffrey'"
<Jeffrey.M.Keenan@enron.com>
cc: "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>

Subject: Update

Gisele Rankin of the Public Staff called me this afternoon to tell me, as
was not entirely unexpected, that the Public Staff will be seeking (and the
Commission will undoubtedly grant) an extension of time of one week within
which to file its testimony.  Her message was very nice.  Tom Chapman was in
my office and listened to it, as well as participating in the follow-up
telephone call that I made to her.  Gisele was out of the office sick Monday
and Tuesday and had not received the data request responses I had been
sending over, although the Public Staff had taken from it from her office
and circulated it.

She confirmed that, with receipt of the information regarding the turbines
today, there is no information outstanding that is due from us.  She said
that she was not in any way assigning blame in the request for an extension;
she was just going to say that the Public Staff needs additional time to
complete its investigation.  She opined that it would probably be
preferable, because the testimony that does get filed next week will be
"cleaner;"  there will be fewer unresolved issues and less need to file and
amendment.  I told her that she could state in her petition for an extension
of time that we did not oppose the request on the condition that it did not
change the October 2 hearing date, and she agreed.  She will put that in the
request as well, and sees no reason that the hearing should be delayed.

She would very much like to see the latest iteration of the PPA (Tom, I
believe you indicated that you would take care of this) and said that it
would be ideal if it could be signed by the time the testimony is filed.
Then there would be no issues outstanding.   The delay in the filing of the
Public Staff's testimony necessitates a delay in the filing of our rebuttal.
I am hoping that this will not be a problem because all the issues between
us can be resolved and then there would be no need for rebuttal.

While Tom was in my office I contacted Len Green in the Attorney General's
office, to ask him about his intervention and to see if we could answer any
questions he might have.  It was clear that he had and has no plans to file
any testimony.  He didn't even have any questions until he gave it some
thought.  He then asked about NC Power's ability to call on the output of
the plant for system reliability reasons, and whether that would be hampered
by Enron's desire to sell at wholesale.  Tom addressed Len's concern
completely by indicating that NC Power had first call on the plant's output.
Len also asked whether the plant would be interconnected to CP & L;  his
concern was with regard to increased opportunities for wholesale sales.  Tom
said that was a possibility down the line, but not imediately.  Len said he
had no further concerns at the moment, but would contact me if he thought of
anything.  As I said, I think it highly unlike that he will file testimony,
but wouldn't be surprised if he were to ask the same questions at the
hearing, to get that information on the record (Jeffrey, take note.)

If you have any questions, give me a call.  Reagan, I will put together a
package of the information you asked for in your e:mail this morning and fed
ex it to you.


Yes, renew my subscription.

	Stephanie E Taylor
	11/29/2000 01:19 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Subscripton Renewal

Dear Mark,

This is to inform you that your subscription to Risk is up for renewal.  The
regular subscription cost through December, 2001, is $599.00.  The cost after
the corporate discount is $509.15.

Please let me know if you would like to renew this publication.  We will be
happy to take care of this for you.  If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Taylor


Frank and Francisco:

Haven't seen you two in awhile!

ENA is considering a financial deal with an offshore entity located in
Panama.  We have no research for this jurisdiction.  I will need to hire
local counsel and send a deriviatives questionnaire for response.  Have you
used Panamanian counsel before?  Please send info.

Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Glenn Schleede, a friend from the early nineties NPC study, provided the attached commentary on the "Generosity of Californians".  I don't whether he sent this to the industry press or just friends.

If anyone is interested, I have the detailed backup.


Luke's growing like crazy.  Great to see the update.  Yeah,   the wedding is
getting near and
the plans are pretty much complete.  We're really just having family so the
plans at this point are minimum.

How's everything in California.  Is Lowery showing up on your doorstep every
Sunday at dinner time?  I wouldn't
be surprised.

Did I tell you about the dinner I attended in NY a month ago.  What an
event.  The party included - get this crew -
Bill Ricigliano, Dan Sweetser, Jonathan Counnnn, Richie Moller, Brian Sh.,
and yes, Vincent Lima.  We were
all privey to Moller drinking a 12 oz. glass of fresh piss.  Some things
never change.

Talk to you soon.

Kevin


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 10/24/2000 09:31:40 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: part-time work

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (rly-xa04.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.73])
by air-xa03.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:51
-0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:48 -0400
Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id MAA18325 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a274f5497734a@nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com> for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:47 -0500
Subject: part-time work
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:49 -0500
Message-ID: <OF1EB17063.BB14093D-ON8625697C.00624EBF@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at 10/18/2000 12:50:19 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
01:00 PM ---------------------------

"Cantekin Dincerler" <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu> on 10/17/2000 10:40:22 AM

Please respond to <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu>

To:   <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  part-time work

Vince:

I enjoyed the lunch and part of your presentation last week (I had an other
engagement to attend to, and hence could not make it to the rest of the
presentation and reception following it).

I appreciate the part-time offer, however, I must admit that I did not find
the terms very favorable. Unlike a person who is permamently located in
Houston, I would have the inconvenience and cost of commuting between
Austin
and Houston, and of accomodation both in Austin and Houston.

I really would love to work in the Research Group and am sincere about
this.
I would just hope that you would consider compensating me at manager level
so that I can cover transportation, accomodation expenses and more
importantly, justify the decision to devote at least half of my time to
Enron away from my thesis.

I will be looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Best,
Cantekin Dincerler

Doctoral Candidate
The University of Texas at Austin
Graduate School of Business
Department of Finance
office: (512) 471-1676
fax   : (512) 471-5073
home  : (512) 472-5356
cell  : (512) 680-5355
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020617.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS4'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/6/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Looks like we can get some help to automate the swaption notification process
going forward...
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 11:31
AM ---------------------------

Ron Nolte
06/29/2000 12:32 PM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

Souad,

There are expiration dates for swaptions/options on the "Detail" button in
TAGG Deal Capture.  Let's
do the following.  Go into TAGG Deal Capture and check to make sure these
dates are valid for swaptions/options.

We will write a report that you can run that identifies deals that are
expiring.

Thanks, Ron

Brent A Price
06-29-2000 02:49 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

We really need to raise the priority on getting this done.  We had a swaption
with significant value to Enron not get excersied this month due to
breakdowns in the manual process.  Let me know how extensive this will be
from an IT perspective.  Thanks

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           06/28/2000 09:53 PM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

the reason for this message and the other message addressed to Jeff Johnson
is that we have system modifications that due to system resources may or may
not get done.  note the ClickPaper comment.
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
06/28/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

Ron Nolte
06/28/2000 03:49 PM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

Souad,

We can implement this - the question is "when". As I indicated to Jeff, we
are currently working on ClickPaper
but we will work on whatever is a higher priority from Enron's point of view.

Thanks, Ron
do to get your request

Souad Mahmassani
06-28-2000 02:47 PM
To: Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TAGG modification request

Ron,

A series of significant events took place this week where it made it more
apparent that a modification in Tagg is highly needed.   Without going into a
lot of detail regarding the events, the modification desired is simply an
Expiration Date field for certain types of transactions (Swaptions), where a
date is keyed by the user at the time the trade is entered into TAGG.  In
addition, this feature will permit TAGG to prompt the user or users with a
message box of the Expiration date and associated Deal Number at a later
time, before the expiration date becomes current (i.e. a week before the
expiration date becomes current).

This request carries a lot of value for it allows ENA to avoid a variety of
risks underlying missing execution of certain types of trades.  This issue
was addressed in the past and I would like to raise it again.

Can we implement such modification? Your prompt response is highly needed and
your feedback is appreciated.

Thanks.

I work on the confirmation desk, reporting to Jeff Sorenson.  Please call me
if you have any questions or suggestions (X37580).


Here's what I hear about who's scheduling what:

The UDCs are scheduling their own g & t
CDWR is scheduling for all UDCs (including SDG&E) in the bilateral market for
day ahead and day of
CDWR is scheduling for all the UDCs (including SDG&E) in the ISO real time
market


Hi Robin,

Attached is the IMPositions TXT file. Here are the following post ID's for
the official books as well.

IM Cand West Financial  827908
IM Cand West Physical   827931
IM Cand West Gas Daily 827935

IM BC Physical 827936
IM BC Financial  827912
IM BC Gas Daily 827937

Geri's Book 827921
Options Gas Daily 827926

Have a good night,
Brian


Tom - Here is the 2002 plan we worked on prior to the bankruptcy filing.  Also, the two logistics employees you mentioned are included with Bob Hall on the file David sent you earlier.

Laynie
x3-3131


Hi, Sooz

Just returned from the Workman Gallery to pay for the painting--which, by the
way, I really like.  It's so nice to know you like something immediately and
don't have to sneak up on it for another look to make up your mind!  Anyway,
I was asking Wally about her gallery--she's been in business for 20 yrs, and
I'm sure in that time there were some really bad times for her here in
Austin.  I was telling her about you, and she said the woman who owns Sloan
Jordan Gal. in the arboretum is an attorney here in town, and is sure she
must have a business manager to run the place.  (Gail or Gayle something.)
Anyway, she said we should call her and invite her to lunch so you could talk
with her.

K, J & G are coming in Sat. for Karin's haircut.  Always anxious to see
Grayson.

Hope our tickets to "Chorus Line" are good.  I'm really looking forward to
it.  The performance starts at 2:30--a decent hour for you to get here.  We
can go out for drinks and dinner afterward.

Glad your painting turned out well.  Looking forward to seeing what a
difference it makes.  Have a good weekend.    love, mum


I'll handle.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Angela Davis@ENRON
	01/10/2001 06:43 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOG Monitization

If you would like me to handle the matter, I'll go.  Otherwise I will not.
Please let me know.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Angela Davis/NA/Enron on 01/10/2001 06:42 AM -----

	Marion Sczykutowicz@ECT
	01/09/2001 05:53 PM

		 To: dbarbour@andrews-kurth.com, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Bowes/NA/Enron@Enron, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint
Walden/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Virginia Dennard/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOG Monitization

A meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, January 10, at 10:15 AM in EB2071
to discuss the above-referenced subject.

Attendees:
Clint Freeland, Host
Gareth Bahlmann
Bill Bowes
Ann Marie Tiller
Clint Walden
Sara Shackleton
David Barbour (A&K), via phone

Marion Sczykutowicz
713/853-5331
713/646-8517 (Fax)
msczykut@enron.com


What is this for?


I definately support  a promotion.  I have not given up on the contract,
although I have not figured out how to make it more palatable for her while
ensuring
she is committed to Enron.

Scott

Frank W Vickers@ENRON
05/15/2001 02:04 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tammi

Scott, Tammi told me that she has chosen not to sign the Employment
Contract.  I understand her issues.  Even before she informed me of her
decision I was thinking that we should support her for mid-year promotion to
Director.  I would like to get your thoughts on this.

Frank


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
03:20 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           12/21/2000 02:24 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Portcalc at home

We can now calc at home/on the laptops.  After you dial in,( connect to
remoteservices.enron.com and log in), select start/programs/trading/xterm off
of the menu.  Xterm will bring up a window ... type in runm.  After that it
is calcing as normal.  From what I can tell it works okay.  Let me know if
you have any problems.

Dave


You are working too hard.


I haven't looked at this yet...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 01:51
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           10/16/2000 11:48 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

Kay - John Nassos prepared the following form of promissory note for loans to
enovate.  Can this substitute for Bracewell's promisorry note?  Let me know
what you think.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
11:45 AM ---------------------------

j.burns@pecorp.com on 10/16/2000 10:18:38 AM
To: Paul.Burgener@enron.com, Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

FYI and comments.  The attached would be issued for funding short-term needs
of enovate.  Thanks

JAB

> ----------
> From:  Nassos, John G.
> Sent:  Monday, October 16, 2000 10:15 AM
> To:  Burns, Jim
> Subject:  Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.
>
> Attached pursuant to your request is a form of promissory note for member
> loans to enovate, L.L.C.  Of course, Enron needs to review it and approve
> of the form as well.  As we discussed, the note is set up as a demand note
> that does not bear interest.
>
> Please call if you have any questions (ext. 4413).
>
>  <<Promissory Notes - shell.doc>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Promissory Notes - shell.doc


Louise,

I spoke with Victor yesterday and he said that the numbers we saw in our Cogentrix meeting reflect our standard QF valuation methodology including a residual value of $250 kW, grown at 2.5% until the end of the contracted period.  I had him do a sensitivity analysis by dropping the value to $100 kW and it only had a $50 million impact.

Let me know if you have any additional thoughts.

Don


Dear Stan:

I greatly appreciated the opportunity to meet with you on Tuesday, and
recognize
that the length of our meeting disrupted your schedule.  I thank you for your
frankness during our discussion.

I do want to reiterate that the business operations of GRI and IGT are
significantly different than those of a utility.  In addition, the evaluation
performed over the past six months has shown that the "mechanical" aspects of
the merger are straightforward.  I believe that basing a CEO selection
dominantly on these two criteria would subject the merged entity to an
unnecessary risk of failure.

Critical to the success of the Institute will be its ability to deliver
demonstrable value to its customers.  All of the critical building blocks will
exist at the combined Institute.  To capitalize on this opportunity, the
leader
must be able to foster a creative, entrepreneurial environment in which
integrated teams work in concert, not in strife.

I encourage you to speak with members of both current and past organizations
that I have headed to gage the level of excitement and commitment that I have
been able to instill and my ability to create an atmosphere of mutual support
and respect from an initial environment of conflict.  My resume documents the
bottom line profit/loss impact that results from these effective teams.

During our discussion you asked if I could work effectively with Bill as the
COO
of the "Institute."  Not only is the answer clearly yes, I emphasize that even
during last year when conflict between GRI and IGT became visible to DOE, Bill
and I made joint visits and presentations to DOE and others to provide a

**********************************************************************

?united
front? and mitigate adverse effects.  During the past six months, I have had
the
opportunity to work closely with Bill and sincerely believe that he would
provide a complementary set of skills and capabilities.

The 300 people that will initially form the Institute deserve the maximum
opportunity for success.  I firmly believe that I have demonstrated the
commitment, leadership skills and energy necessary to successfully merge the
best aspects of GRI and IGT. I do not believe that you will be able to
identify
another individual that has as high a likelihood of forging an integrated team
that will maximize the impact of the Institute on its current and future
customer bases.

I look forward to our continued interactions.

Stan Borys


Ms. Holland,

I am a first year law student at Tulane, and currently seeking a summer
associate position with a well-regarded Houston law firm.

I have attached my resume and would very much like to meet with you while I
am home in Houston during winter break in order to discuss a possible
clerkship with your firm.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Warmest regards,
Katy Gottsponer

 - resume-KGottsponer.doc


Greetings Mark:

Here is the latest.

ENA signed a short-term deal (5 -week term, I believe) with DWR that goes
through the end of the month, at which time we have the option to extend the
deal to a five-year term.  We are discussing other longer-term deals, too.

As Steve points out, we've had serious concerns regarding DWR's
creditworthiness.  (DWR, the Dept. of Water Resources, is the state agency
that Davis made the purchaser of power when the utilities hit the financial
skids a few months ago and the market stopped selling them power.)

The problem has been simple and significant---while our brilliant Governor
and Legislature gave DWR the authority to buy power on behalf of the
cash-strapped utilities, they neglected to t spell out how DWR would recover
its costs of buying the power.

Based on comments from us and other suppliers regarding the creditworthiness
issue, the California PUC issued an order last week establishing that 1) the
PUC would indeed pass DWR's power costs through to ratepayers and 2) the PUC
would NOT second-guess (i.e., impose "reasonabless" standards) on any
contracts signed by DWR as a condition of passing the costs through to
ratepayers.

With the CPUC decision (and other language that ENA's negotiated into the DWR
contract), ENA is close to being comfortable signing the 5-year deal, even in
the face of the FERC order.  That's predominantly due to the fact that the
power price in the 5-year deal would come in well under the $150/MWH
threshold that FERC has set up for any sort of "refund review."  But other
things could crop up between now and the exercise date that could muck things
up. I'll keep you posted on developments  as they transpire.

The big problem (as Steve notes) is that the State is on the verge of (some
say hell bent on) taking over the entire electricity industry in California
in perpetuity.  Our original proposal focused on getting price volatility and
the utilities' financial position back under control.  Our contracting
proposals have always been couched in the context of a temporary, stop-gap
measure.  That is, the state would do the minimum amount needed via contracts
to stabilize prices while simultaneoulsly doing what was necessary to get
de-regulation back on track in California.  And once the situation had been
righted, the State would as soon as possible exit the industry and let the
market step back in.  Unfortunately, command-and-control, anti-deregulation
policymakers have taken hold of the agenda (with the blessing, seemingly, of
the Governor), and are moving the state toward a "takeover" response.  That's
what we're actively opposing.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate.

Best,
Jeff


_________________________________________________________________________
MARK, This email message may be a recurring mailing.
If you would like to be removed from our email announcement list,
click on the link below (You may need to copy and paste the link
into your browser)click below: http://216.242.110.66/remove/unsubscribe.html
__________________________________________________________________________

Dear MARK:

On behalf of the WHO'S WHO Historical Society, I am pleased to inform
you that you have been selected as a possible candidate for
the 2001/2002 edition of International WHO'S WHO of Professionals.
This is the definitive work on the world's leaders in commerce, economics,
policy, and trade.  In today's difficult economy admission to a powerful
network of professionals can be a career lifeline.
We do require additional information and ask that you complete the data
form via the Internet at http://www.internationalwhoswho.com/fax/5166.htm

There is no fee associated with your listing in WHO'S WHO, and we do not
distribute member information for resale.   Our goal is to provide
reference information and a networking forum for world leaders.

Nomination to WHO'S WHO is an honor in itself.  The Society was founded
in 1928 and provides the most comprehensive listing of professionals whose
contributions shape and direct the destiny of nations.  Our
unabbreviated biographies, of the most successful professionals from 150
countries, are housed in private libraries and collections around the
world.

Current members who grace our pages include leading business executives,
heads of state, noted academics and other professionals.

Our editorial deadline is quickly approaching.  I urge you to act today.
If you delay, I cannot guarantee the committee will have ample time to
review your submission.

Sincerely,

Terrence J. Leifheit
Executive Director

PS:  Please be sure to fill in the fax and e-mail sections so we can get
proofs of your biographical write-up to you quickly if you are selected
for inclusion.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/20/2001 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Fritz Rumscheidt@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/20/2001 09:11 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Dick Westfahl Retirement


Lindsay, these product descriptions are approved by me on behalf of the legal department (subject to the point I made about the "Reference Period" and your explanation back to me this morning) -- Bob Bruce

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicke, Scott
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Arnold, Matthew; Renaud, Lindsay; Bruce, Robert
Subject:	Updated L&S Description

This copy has the change Bob mentioned - Scott
 << File: Product Descriptions.doc >>