>From: "stanley czajkowski" <sjplus5@hotmail.com>
>To: BJLord2@aol.com, cahemming@hotmail.com, Cardiac696@aol.com,
>cardiac734@aol.com, cardiactech@adelphia.net, cmarsh3892@aol.com,
>dwestwood@erols.com, emsequalnolife@aol.com, found1@earthlink.net,
>Gary_Butt@dom.com, haasdc@borg.com, haasmb@netscape.net,
>jwalsh@medicorpihn.com, katwilliams@juno.com, kesterl@hoffman.army.mil,
>kidd108@attbi.com, Larry.Gordon@usmc-mccs.org, maniac_8@hotmail.com,
>okfine66@aol.com, pd4byot@aol.com, pita651@aol.com, ralph.walters@gsa.gov,
>rdavies@twcny.rr.com, s-t-a-k@msn.com, shedrick@erols.com,
>tina_leavy@msn.com, welsh@ibb.gov
>Subject: Fwd: LOL
>Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:58:49 -0500
>
>
>
>
>>From: ladybee108@webtv.net (?-?ug)
>>To: dudley1011@webtv.net, Luvtochat23L@webtv.net, grandmabet3@webtv.net,
>>jscanlo5@twcny.rr.com, MSdowjones@webtv.net, SANDIWINGS55@hotmail.com,
>>slater@mybizz.net, doctor_ray@webtv.net, sjplus5@hotmail.com,
>>Chasmolucy@webtv.net, MISTY-729@webtv.net, pjd1059@aol.com,
>>ealat@adelphia.net
>>Subject: LOL
>>Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>
>>
>>Two older men are sitting on a park bench talking and one of them asks
>>the other about his sex life. The man answers that he has an excellent
>>sex life and is still very active. The other man confesses that his
>>sexual appetite has greatly diminished with old age so he asks the other
>>man if he has any secrets for staying sexually vital.
>>"Well," answered the man, "I eat rye bread everyday. That is my secret.
>>If you just eat rye bread, your sex life will improve dramatically." The
>>other man decides to follow this advice and finds a bakery nearby. He
>>tells the clerk behind the counter that he wants all of the loaves of
>>rye bread that they have in stock. The clerk then asks the man, "do you
>>want whole loaves or do you want us to slice them?"
>>The man looks puzzled and asks the clerk, "what is the difference?"
>>The clerk responds, "well when it's sliced, it gets harder faster." To
>>which the man responded, "how come everyone knew about this but me."
>>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


Testing... DL-Portland Real Time Shift e-mail address.
If you DO receive this message please send me a quick response
to let me know this e-mail address is working.
thanks, Jill


On July 1st, Project Apollo and Beyond launched its final SAP implementation.
Enron now has an integrated, common financial, human resources, procurement,
and project management system throughout the majority of Enron's businesses.
By far Enron,s largest SAP implementation, this &go live8 added approximately
8500 new users ) raising the total user population from Apollo and Beyond
implementation efforts to over 13,000 Enron employees and contractors.

A highlight of this implementation was the rollout of eHRonline, an
intranet-based system that enables individuals to manage their personal
information and time management activities plus view their pay information
and benefit elections.  This new system gives the power and capability for
managing your information to the person who knows the most about it ) YOU!

The Apollo and Beyond solution will yield savings of over $30 million per
year plus provide increased speed and accuracy of information.  Once
post-implementation efforts have been successfully completed, the focus will
turn to system support, enhancements, and additional projects to help
leverage Enron's SAP system for increased growth and profitability.

Many thanks to the HR, financial, project and procurement communities for
their efforts towards the vision of +One Enron,!

For questions or assistance, please contact Enron,s SAP support organization
at 713-345-4SAP.


There seems to be a fundamental issue which must be clarified among the TFG if we are to keep this proceeding manageable, and I'm afraid that the draft which has been circulated is heading in the wrong direction.  Portland General was of the opinion that ripple claims were to be deferred to a later date and not to be considered by the Judge at all in this phase of the proceeding.  Given the issues in this case regarding unlawful retroactivity, differences between the California and PNW market structure, and an unduly short timeframe in which to hold a hearing, there is no reason to start getting into the counter claim/cross claim morass unless and until the Judge and/or the Commission rules that refunds are required as a matter of law.  In that event, each member of the TFG (and for that matter, every party to the proceeding) has to have fully reserved its rights to file counter and cross-claims in order to seek compensation from any other party for liability which may have been ordered to the parties filing affirmative cases.

This approach does not mean that a party cannot defend itself in this phase against another party who makes an affirmative claim against it in the initial round of testimony .  Such party should be able to defend against not only the specific price, volume, etc. of the claim, but also should be able to respond with a counter-claim against the party initially claiming the refund in order to ascertain the net refund, if any, due the proponent.  Cross-claims can be deferred and are not necessary at this point.

Limiting the first phase in this manner should allow a record to be developed as to the net amount of refunds potentially due to those filing an affirmative case, but need not, at this point, develop cross-claims or start up the next "ripple."

Avoiding ripple claims to the greatest extent possible in the first phase of this proceeding would also answer the question of whether the parties could try to expand the bases for refunds, since the Judge (and/or Commission) would have already made rulings as to the definition of "spot market" and other parameters of a refund calculation.  We should be taking positions on all of these market structure issues in the testimony and filings we make now, and the resulting decisions will guide further phases.

This was Portland General's understanding of what the ripple stipulation was intended to reflect.  PGE does not support an approach which would greatly expand this phase of the proceeding to incorporate filings on ripple claims at the end of this month, and I'm not entirely sure that the current draft was intended to do that.  However, that is my reading of its effect.  Are others in agreement with the general approach outlined in this email or do we need to schedule a quick conference call to discuss/confirm the  principles and details of how we go forward?


---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/08/2000 12:06 PM ---------------------------

Tim.Fagan@UAECorp.COM (Tim Fagan) on 03/07/2000 02:30:45 PM
To: Bruce.Golden@enron.com
cc: Reed.Wills@UAECorp.COM (Reed Wills)

Subject: EPC Scope Document

Bruce,

Please find attached an EPC scope document to be used in obtaining preliminary
pricing from vendors. Please provide comments or call with any questions.

Thanks

Tim Fagan
201-307-8989 x169

 - EPC Scope of Work.doc


Approved.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 11:45 AM -----

	Robert Bruce@ENRON
	Sent by: Robert Bruce@ENRON
	12/12/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Mark, may I please have one of the new thin desktop monitors? -- thanks, Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


We are pleased to announce that Jim Noles, president and chief operating
officer of Enron Wind, will assume the additional role of chief executive
officer, effective immediately.  Jim will continue to be based in Houston.

Jim joined Enron Wind as its president in May of this year.  Prior to that
appointment, Jim was managing director for Enron's Operations Support Group
of Global Asset Operations and provided operations and maintenance oversight
and technical assistance to Enron's worldwide facilities.

Previously, Jim worked with Enron International's Asset Management team where
he formed the North American Asset Management Group to provide operation and
maintenance services to Enron North America's electricity generation peaker
plants that entered into service in 1999.  Jim joined Enron in 1995 as vice
president of Enron Development Corp. to head up its Middle East Regional
Development team.

Prior to joining Enron, Jim was an international marketer for TRW's Systems
Integration Group with responsibilities in the Middle East.  Jim served in
the U.S. Army for 25 years, culminating his career as a Brigadier General.
His education includes a bachelor's degree from the University of North
Alabama and a master's of public administration from the University of
Alabama.

Jim has a solid track record in development, sales, operations, and
leadership and has had a positive impact on Enron Wind's growth and
profitability in the short period since joining the company.  Please join us
in congratulating Jim on his promotion and new responsibilities.


Hi there.  Will either one of you be able to help me with
this?

Thanks,
Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 07/13/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Susan Flynn@ECT
07/06/2000 11:42 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confirmation Letter

 Tan and Susan - can one of you handle this?  I called Diane Anderson and
told her that I'll be leaving Enron and won't be able to help her.  I told
her I would foreward the email on to you.   Thanks!

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 11:34 AM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	07/06/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Confirmation Letter

Susan,

I am working with Joe Hunter to prepare the individual letters to our
counterparties
for the below detailed project.   In order to fill in the blanks in the first
paragraph
of Carol's template, it is necessary for me to know the appropriate section
in
each counterparty's Agreement that references the existing confirmation
procedures
(the "Confirmation Procedures").

Would it be possible for you to provide me with copies of the Master
Agreements
for each of the following counterparties, so I can fill in the blanks and get
these letters
out the door:

Bank One (formerly FNB)
Bankers Trust Company
Barclays Bank PLC
The Chase Manhattan Bank
Citibank, N.A.
Credit Suisse Financial Products
Elf Trading S.A
J.Aron & Company
Paribas
Phibro Inc.
Royal Bank of Canada

I would be happy to come up and retrieve them as soon as you have them ready.
If you have any questions, please give me ( 3-0443) or Joe ( 3-3316) a call.

Thanks - we're looking forward to being able to implement this procedure.
-Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 07/06/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter @ ECT                           07/06/2000 08:41 AM

To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Confirmation Letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                06/16/2000 09:25 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confirmation Letter

Joe Hunter has asked me to draft a form of confirmation reply letter that we
could send to our counterparties in lieu of signing their confirmations.
This form of letter with the appropriate chnages could also be used by those
counterparties that we confirm.  Please let me know if you have any comments
on this form or any concerns about implementing this process.  Thanks.
Carol


To all,

AEP has recently stopped signing our Financial Confirmations due to the fact
that the ISDA Master shows that they are the confirming party.  We have never
signed their confirmations, nor do they even send confirmations currently.
AEP has indicated that they would be willing to amend the Master for the
confirming party to be Enron.  Can one of you please start this ball rolling?

Thanks,
Joe


Ken:

Mark H. asked me to forward to you this initial draft term sheet.  We would
like to talk to you, and presumably one of your colleagues, tomorrow
regarding the possible antitrust implications of the proposed structure.
Please give me a call and we can schedule a time.

Thanks,

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2000 06:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark E Haedicke                           03/01/2000 05:47 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Bigtoe

Mark, give me a call.  Mark


i talked to him last week and we are going to schedule something for next
week.


For hand delivery of your tickets, please provide an Enron location.
If you prefer, we can Fed Ex your tickets to your home. There is an
additional charge for this service.
Thanks,
Natalie


Attached is the file for the Riverside Unit or "Badlands" for August.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-464-8298 or Darren Cavanaugh at 503-464-5105.

Jim


Paula,

 35 million is fine

Phillip


Stacy  is working with Constellation on a Master / GISB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:36 PM
To:	Johnson, Cheryl
Cc:	Vanek, Darren; Dickson, Stacy E.; Perlingiere, Debra; Rodriguez, Bernice; Anderson, Bridgette; Campos, Anthony; Elledge, Susan; Gonzales, Sharon; Bryan, Linda S.
Subject:	FW: Constellation Energy Source, Inc., CP 55358
Importance:	High

Cheryl,

I have reviewed the current contracts and deals in place with Constellation Energy Source, Inc. (CP ID 55358) and found that we have deals extending through 08/31/01.  However, the only current deals are with ICC Energy Corporation (an alternate payee under our contract with Constellation Energy Source, Inc. ).  There are NO current deals with Constellation Energy Source, Inc. at this time.

We currently have two master contracts in place as well as two spot GTCs.  I imagine that we will need to terminate all these agreements, but Legal is unaware of any changes with this counterparty.  Darren, can you please provide Stacy Dickson with the name of your contact at Constellation?

We also do not have ANY master agreements in place with Constellation Power Source, Inc. - all business (telephonic and EOL) is being covered under GTCs.  Stacy or Debra, do we have any negotiations in place for a master under this name?  Darren, can you work with Stacy on this?

Please let me know if we need to terminate or trade suspend the Constellation Energy Source, Inc. agreements.

Thanks,
SBR x30569

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Johnson, Cheryl; Vanek, Darren
Cc:	Rodriguez, Bernice; Perlingiere, Debra; Anderson, Bridgette; Dickson, Stacy E.; Nemec, Gerald; Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Subject:	RE: Constellation Energy Source, Inc., CP 55358
Importance:	High

Cheryl,

Please do not suspend this CP until my group can review the current contracts in place and any deals that may have been covered by those contracts.  Bridgette Anderson will be looking at this once trading slows tomorrow.  We'll discuss it and get back with you tomorrow afternoon.

Has anyone in Legal heard anything on this?

Thanks,
SBR x30569

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Cheryl
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 6:50 PM
To:	Richardson, Stacey; Vanek, Darren
Cc:	Rodriguez, Bernice
Subject:	Constellation Energy Source, Inc., CP 55358

Hi Stacey,

Got a request from Darren in Credit, to change the status of the subject CP to non-trading.  When I made the change, I got the edit that indicates that 8 contracts are still active on the record, and the maintenance group is HOUGAS.  Per Darren, all trades should be under CP ID 55134, i/no/ Constellation Power Source, Inc.  I just want to make sure those can be moved if the record is in a non-trading status.

This is also flagged for EES, should that link and retail flag be added to the Constellation Power Source record, even though it is not known to be one of EES's customers at this time, or at least it hasn't been flagged as such at this time?  I also went in to make that change, but since you are working on those contracts, I wanted to run it by you first.

Cheryl Johnson
Enron Net Works
Global Data Management
713.853.3103


Attached is a reference document that I prepared for Steve Kean that shows
current and former Enron and Corporate Policy Committee membership as well as
VP PRC membership.


Hi Keith!

Thanks so much for your additional thoughts, which I will definitely pass on
to our business units.

As for your nephew, please have him send his resume to me.  I'll be happy to
see what I can do.

Again, on behalf of Enron and everyone involved in the project, especially
Vince and I and Ken Parkhill, we had a great and informative experience with
the entire Tiger Project.

Best regards!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
07:15 AM ---------------------------

Weigelt <Weigelt@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/06/2001 04:40:10 PM
To: "'christie.patrick@enron.com'" <christie.patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: thanks

Christie;

I wanted to send a short note to express my thanks to Enron, and give some
additional thoughts about the Enron presentation.  Both students and staff
enjoyed our interaction with Enron.  We hope Enron got as much from the
project as we did.

I also had some additional thoughts about EnronOnline.

- During the presentation, the students referred to a market's "critical
mass".  However, we never defined what we meant by that.  We had several
discussions on this topic.  I think the best way for Enron to think about
this is in terms of the psychology of traders.  Critical mass gives a market
liquidity.  Traders seem to think about liquidity in terms of breadth (how
many products are being traded) and depth (the number of bids and offers).
Our thoughts were that when a trader pulls up a screen, he (or she) wants to
see bids, offers, and trades occurring.  So a simple (and cheap) metric that
Enron could use to determine whether rivals are approaching critical mass is
simply to pull up screens and see if trades are occurring, and how quickly.
Traders will generally not use a trading platform that lacks "action".

- In terms of New Power, I feel it is extremely important that your managers
create an identity for the company.  Luckily no rival has done this (though
Green Energy is closer than most).  The company that can communicate a
simple and powerful message will create a competitive advantage for itself.
I believe you can differentiate yourself in this market (though you are
selling a commodity).  Since you are essentially selling service,
differentiation is always possible.

On a final note, I wanted to ask a favor.  My nephew recently graduate from
Michigan State University with a degree in business.  I brought him to
Wharton to work on the Tiger Projects.  This was because I knew he could add
value, and because I thought he needed more experience in some strategy
areas.  He served as project coordinator and worked on several projects
(including Enron).  I was hoping I could get him an interview at Enron since
he expressed interest in your company.  Any help you could offer is
appreciated.

Thanks again for making the experience memorable to the students.

Keith


Hi John,

Neil and I discussed this last night.  I know we are interested in at least
as many games as we had last year.  I'll check with him and get back to you.

Hope all is well.  I haven't forgotten you!

Kay


Jeff, I do have a copy but I'm not in the office today.  Ask Joseph if he has
a copy, I think I forwarded one there.  Also, attached is the legal letter
template that we use for retainment.  Use this document and make the
necessary changes.  If changes are drastic, we will need to get it approved
by Sharon Butler in Legal.  I will be checking e:mail periodically, so e:mail
if you need anything further.  Have a GREAT TURKEY DAY!!!!!!!

gngr

Jeff Dasovich on 11/22/99 05:24:56 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: engagement letter template

left you a voice mail.  need to draft an engagement letter for the attorney
we've hired for ECI in california.  do you have a copy of the final version
of the engagement letter drafted to retain rochelle chong in california?  if
so, thought i'd crib from it.  thanks, jeff


Dear Traders,

I have been finding and fixing a great number of transmission deals lately
and I have noticed the following that keeps coming up:

When you put in a deal, please include the wheel if you are using
transmission and be sure to route it properly.
When you schedule transmission for a deal, please be sure to separate light
load hours and heavy load hours and put them in at different prices. (except
Sundays and holidays, which are for the most part at LLH prices all day).

Please also record OASIS numbers in your Deal Entry or in Deal Scheduling
when you request tranny.  Both Deal Entry and Deal Scheduling have fields for
OASIS numbers.  If you don't provide OASIS numbers, I may have to rely on the
counterparty's documentation as proof of # of MW requested.

Here's a cheat sheet of LLH and HLH prices by company:

BPA    LLH $  2.25       HLH $ 5.00
NPC    LLH $ 2.40       HLH $ 3.60
SNO    LLH $ 1.75       HLH $ 2.25
PAC      LLH $  5.84      HLH $ 5.84

Of course, there are stipulations and these prices are not set in stone.
Please use your experience and discretion when entering transmission prices.

Thanks guys,

Virginia


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011421.txt


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
	Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
	Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
	YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer browser, 5.0 or higher.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipperer, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:19 AM
To:	Schneider, Bryce
Subject:	Updated NYISO Forecast Comparison Model

I made a couple minor changes, please check and insure that the numbers are valid. I checked them with what's in the database and they match.

Mike


Kay:

This past Friday, I received six original signature pages to the Letter
Agreement, but did not receive original signature pages to the Guaranty.
Could you forward the signature pages to the Guaranty at your earliest
convenience?

Thanks,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:54 AM
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com; mreuter@kslaw.com
Subject: NW escrow agreement

Hi there,

I believe Chris should be back today, so I wanted to follow up on this.

I don't have any recollection of where we left the escrow agreement with
NW.  Please get with MKahn or Jerry DeBerry to see if we can get consensus
on the current form of escrow agreement.  Once we have that, Enron (Chris)
will make contact with Citibank.

Thanks,

Kay
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


oh yeah.  Well anyway, hope you have a good week.  Take care.


January __, 2000

Via Facsimile

MEMORANDUM TO:	Paul Simons
	(Enron Europe Limited)

	Mark Taylor
	(Enron North America Corp.)
 FROM:	Kenneth M. Raisler
	David J. Gilberg
 RE:	Enron Online/Credit Product

This memorandum summarizes the proposed procedures we discussed during our
meeting on January 13, 2000 for use in connection with the credit derivatives
product (the &Product8) to be offered by Enron Capital & Trade Resources
International Corp. and its affiliates (collectively, &Enron8) through &Enron
Online8.  These procedures, which we will be assisting you in preparing, are
designed to reduce Enron,s exposure to those entities on whose credit the
Product will be based (the &Reference Entities8) as well as Enron,s exposure
to other related types of liabilities.  We have previously outlined these
areas of exposure in our memoranda dated December 15, 1999 and December 22,
1999.
1. Disclosure * All Reference Entities should be advised, by letter, of the
fact that they will be included in the list of entities that will be the
subject of the Product.  These disclosures will of course be separate from,
although related to, the disclosures to be provided to counterparties to
transactions in the Product.

? This disclosure should inform the Reference Entity of the introduction of
the Product, and describe the general nature of the Product and the manner in
which it will be traded (e.g., through Enron Online).

? In general, however, Enron need not request that the Reference Entities
consent to or acknowledge their inclusion in the list of the Reference
Entities, except as set forth below in paragraph 2.

  2. Consent * Enron should, however, obtain the prior consent of certain
types of Reference Entities before including them in the list of Reference
Entities.

? In particular, consent should be obtained from any Reference Entities with
which Enron has a significant trading relationship that includes advice or
other services that could result in Enron being considered a fiduciary of the
Reference Entity or that could otherwise give rise to common law duties that
could be violated if the Reference Entity does not consent to the arrangement.

? Enron need not seek consent from those large and sophisticated
counterparties to which Enron merely provides prices and with which Enron
trades on an exclusively arms, length basis with no advisory or similar
services being provided and with no fiduciary obligations.

? Where consent is sought, Enron should include a request that the Reference
Entity acknowledge its receipt of the letter and its consent to being
included in the list of Reference Entities.  If a Reference Entity fails or
refuses to execute the letter, Enron will need to make a determination, on a
case-by-case basis, as to whether it is comfortable including that entity on
the list of Reference Entities.  However, it should be recognized that, by
requesting consent, Enron may be limiting its ability to treat an entity as a
Reference Entity in the absence of consent.

3. Chinese Wall * We understand that it will not be feasible to construct a
complete &Chinese Wall8 between the operations related to the Product and
Enron,s other trading activities.  This is due primarily to the fact that
activities related to the Product will utilize the same credit function as
Enron,s other trading activities.  However, Enron should implement a modified
Chinese Wall between the trading operations.  This approach would enhance
Enron,s ability to defend successfully against any claims of impropriety or
breach of duty by facilitating Enron,s ability to demonstrate that
information had not been shared by other traders with those trading the
Product. This could be accomplished through a number of procedures.

? First, Enron should maintain the maximum possible degree of physical
separation between personnel responsible for pricing and trading the Product,
on the one hand, and Enron,s other trading activities, on the other hand.
Even if personnel involved in the Product are located on the same floor as
other traders, it would be prudent to place them in a separate area of the
floor set off by partitions or similar features.

? Second, procedures should be developed to prohibit the flow of information
between Product traders and other traders if such information is material to
the creditworthiness of trading counterparties and is not in the public
domain.  In addition, all trading personnel should be instructed with respect
to the procedures through training programs.

? Finally, senior supervisory officers of Enron should be assigned to monitor
communications between the groups of traders and to review and make
determinations on requests by traders to communicate information that would
otherwise be prohibited under the procedures.  These procedures will be
similar to those that have been developed in connection with Enron,s equity
trading activities.

4. Restricted List -- Enron should establish and maintain a &restricted list8
of those entities on which Products may not be traded.

? Initially, the list could be used to exclude those entities on which it is
not feasible for Enron to offer Products due to the nature of its
relationships with such entities; e.g., those entities with respect to which
Enron might be considered a fiduciary and which have not consented to their
inclusion and those entities about which Enron has or regularly receives
material, non-public information.  In addition, those entities with which
Enron has entered into confidentiality agreements will most likely need to be
excluded, depending on the terms of such agreements.

? Enron should also establish procedures to monitor its receipt of
information regarding Reference Entities on which Products are listed.
Pursuant to these procedures, Enron should suspend the listing of quotations,
and therefore the issuance of new Products, with respect to a Reference
Entity, if Enron is in possession of material, non-public information
regarding such Entity of a type, or in situations, that render suspension
necessary or advisable.  This would include situations in which Enron is
considering an investment in or a joint venture with a Reference Entity.  In
addition, the procedures should provide for Reference Entities to be excluded
or deleted for reasons unrelated to Enron,s possession of information as
well; e.g., where Enron has reached or exceeded its credit limits with
respect to such Entities.

? The procedures should state that Enron may close out an open position for a
Product held by a counterparty, if the counterparty specifically requests
Enron to do so.  The procedures should also address the pricing of the
closing transaction, however, and establish a mechanism for such pricing that
minimizes Enron,s potential exposure to liability as a result of its
effecting a transaction while in possession of material, non-public
information.

? Enron should provide training to the appropriate personnel, which should
include instructing such personnel not to furnish Product counterparties with
any notification or explanation of a Reference Entity being placed on the
restricted list.

As noted, we will be assisting you in developing these procedurew, which will
need to be integrated into Enron,s existing policies and procedures.  In
addition, as we have advised you in our prior memoranda, there are no
procedures that will fully insulate Enron from the potential liabilities
arising in connection with its offering of the Product.  However, the
implementation of the types of procedures described above should assist Enron
in mitigating such risks and defending against claims that might be made by
Reference Entities.
Please call us if you have questions on these or other issues.

K.M.R.
D.J.G.


summer or winter

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net>
>To: "T FEDER" <lawfeder@msn.com>, <WILLIAM.HOGAN@ANICO.COM>
>Subject: RE: get on the bandwagon
>Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:19:03 -0500
>
>SOCCER IS RIGHT UP THERE WITH THE OLYMPICS.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: T FEDER [mailto:lawfeder@msn.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:02 PM
>To: amacadams@integratech.cc; Corey.Ray@twtelecom.com;
>cristina@cdlanguage.com; ctjeremiah@kjf-llp.com;
>texaslawyer98@hotmail.com; injurylawyer@msn.com; erwollam@hotmail.com;
>Parks, Joe; mediatetoday@yahoo.com; mereli97@yahoo.com;
>nyfeders@msn.com; Towsontwo@aol.com
>Subject: get on the bandwagon
>
>
>
>Get on the band wagon for soccer:  from the Washington Post....."Now the
>time is right. Because 1) Soccer fever is sweeping the country like
>malaria.
>And 2) We can get a short-term lease on a quality vehicle. And that's good,
>considering we're in a single-elimination situation, and we play 83-time
>winner Germany on Friday. Not to put too fine a point on it, but many
>Germans rank soccer behind only "full scale war" as the favorite sport of
>the country. (Hey, how about France, huh? Talk about gagging on the
>fromage!
>Three games, no goals. Au revoir, Pierre. Isn't it just like the French to
>go out early and leave it up to us to beat the Germans?)"
>
>
>USA USA USA
>
>
> >From: "Hogan, William" <William.Hogan@ANICO.com>
> >To: "Andrew Biggs (E-mail)" <abiggs@tvmcapital.com>, "Danny Gillespie
> >(E-mail)" <danny@idealflow.com>, "David S. Dunson (E-mail)"
> ><David.S.Dunson@chase.com>, "Dickie Gregg (E-mail)"
> ><dhgregg3@cyberbay.net>, "Jack Belcher (E-mail)"
><jbelcher@chemweek.com>, >"Joe Parks (E-mail)" <jparks1@houston.rr.com>,
>"Jordan Levin (E-mail)"
> ><jr.levin@thewb.com>, "Jordan Levin (E-mail 2)"  <JR.Levin@thewb.com>,
> >"Laura Merritt (E-mail)" <lmerritt@bracepatt.com>, "Richard Mullen
> >(E-mail)" <rmullen@loyaltymatrix.com>, "Richard Mullen (E-mail 2)"
> ><richard_mullen@yahoo.com>, "Robert Williams (E-mail)" <rww7w@aol.com>,
> >"Stacey Schnitzius (E-mail)"  <Stacey_schnitzius@bmc.com>, "Todd Feder
> >(E-mail)" <lawfeder@msn.com>, "Ward Sheffield (E-mail)"
> ><wsheffield@hahnclay.com>
> >Subject: New e-mail
> >Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:25:11 -0500
> >
> >New e-mail address:
> >
> >galvetraz@houston.rr.com
> >
> >WJH
> >
>
>
>
>
>Todd C. Feder
>Kelly, Jeremiah, & Feder, L.L.P.
>5900 Memorial Drive, Suite 350
>Houston, Texas 77007
>(713) 839-8131
>lawfeder@msn.com
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
>http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>
>************************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its
>relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material
>for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
>distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
>the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
>contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and
>any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)
>and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
>Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
>recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
>basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>************************************************************************
>

Todd C. Feder
Kelly, Jeremiah, & Feder, L.L.P.
5900 Memorial Drive, Suite 350
Houston, Texas 77007
(713) 839-8131
lawfeder@msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/29/99 07:56 AM
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
09/29/99 04:47 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Online Trading

Tana,

ECT Houston can engage in commodity/weather derivatives trades direct with
French counterparties, without having to use EEFT as the UK regulated
arranger.  Put another way, whatever ECTRI can do from a regulatory
perspective, the same applies to ECT Houston.  Please refer to the completed
list that Edmund sent.

As for engaging in derivatives trades with utilities, this does not give rise
to the issues as under US laws.  [In respect of new counterparties, standard
due diligence as to corporate authority, etc will need to be done].

Hope all's well!

Justin/Ed

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           28/09/99 16:48

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Trading

Per Mark's conversation, you were going to get back to us on the scoop on
France and utility counterparties.  Any update?


Hi Mark,
I'm really sorry to have heard about your Dad. I know I'm just one on a long
list of people that always enjoyed his company, hospitality and high
spirits...he always treated me like a bro and I know how much he meant to you.
I'm heading north to Humboldt with Stacey this afternoon (been in Sac all
week) and will probably be there for a little while.  Be sure to let me know
where you're gonna be, 'cause I plan on heading further north sometime.
Hope to see you soon, and I'll be in touch until then...
-Marc

Get FREE Email/Voicemail with 15MB at Lycos Communications at
http://comm.lycos.com


As a benefit of membership in the Western Coal Council, we are sending the
latest issue of the Western Coal Advisory in .pdf format. You'll need Adobe
Acrobat Reader to view this file.? This program is available at no charge at
Acrobat Reader.

You will be receiving a printed version in about 10 days.

We hope you enjoy receiving this copy in advance, and thank you for your
continued support of the Western Coal Council.

Janet Gellici, Executive Director
www.westerncoalcouncil.org

If you do not wish to receive this newsletter in the future, simply reply to
this message with "REMOVE" in the subject area, and we will remove your
e-mail address from future transmissions.? Thank You!
 - autumn2000.pdf


I will be taking vacation days March 13-15.

Twist
3-6203


Please send me the Oglethorpe activity in excel for Dec 2000.

thanks


Richard

Following our meeting I have been discussing the voice recording requirements
with other members of the project team, and I need to correct one piece of
information I supplied to you.

Regarding the recording of internal calls, it is possible to not record calls
made on the Lucent digital phones internally, but ALL calls made on turrets
(the phones the traders use) would have to be recorded, whether internal or
external. This is due to the way in which the voice recording system must be
connected to the turret system. Therefore, could you assume when considering
what the corporate requirements are that we cannot exclude internal calls.

My apologies for this mistake, we are going to investigate the development of
a solution to this problem with the vendors under consideration. I will keep
you in touch with all progress that is made.

Many thanks for your time this morning.

Regards

Stuart Fieldhouse
x35699


Attached is the August 10, 2001 draft of the proposal to FERC regarding the
allocation methodology based on the latest comments from Lynn Miller.

As we discussed yesterday during the Official Committee conference call,
today I am circulating this draft to the Official Committee, the attorneys
for the Official Committee, the CalPX and the attorneys for the CalPX.  I
would like to receive all comments back from this group by Weds, August 15,
at which point I propose to circulate the draft to the Unofficial Energy
Sellers Group, and the Coral FERC litigation group that initiated the
proceedings that resulted in the April 6 order from FERC rescinding the
chargebacks issued by the CalPX through March 5.  PG&E also asked for an
advance opportunity to comment on the proposal, which we should consider
offering in light of PG&E's more cooperative approach.  I propose to allow
several days for comments from the broader distribution group, and propose
thereafter to file appropriate proceedings concurrently before FERC and the
CalPX bankruptcy court seeking approval of the proposal, as we have
discussed.  Approval from District Judge Moreno should  follow after the
bankruptcy court approval is obtained.

As soon as the Official Committee's attorneys have prepared drafts of the
moving papers that will be submitted to FERC and the bankruptcy court, we
will circulate copies to the members of the Official Committee for comments.

Please let me have your comments as soon as possible.  Thanks.

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE* The information contained in this e-mail message is
intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as
such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail, and
delete the original message.

 - FERC Proposal  Weg rev Aug 10 01.DOC


And, how might I get them?

--Lizzette

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:22 PM
To:	Palmer, Lizzette; Sullivan, Kriste; Butcher, Sharon
Subject:	RE: M&A's

boy, do i

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, Lizzette
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Sullivan, Kriste; Butcher, Sharon
Subject:	M&A's

Do any of you have any forms or checklists that you use in reviewing proposed transactions to identify labor & employment issues as part of the due diligence process?

--Lizzette


Tana:  I've already spoken with Clem this morning and he is on board with
this form.  The changes we are making are not substantive so let's make 'em
(marked in yellow on the hard copy I've delivered to you) and get this signed
right away.  Clem is going on vacation Friday.  We should also email a copy
to Jack Foley when the revisions are made.  PG&E will send execution copies
to me.  The paralegal handling this is Maryann Friel at (415) 973-4599.
Thanks for your help.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 11:02 AM -----

	"Foley, Jack" <JRFc@pge.com>
	05/01/2000 11:51 AM

		 To: "'Sara Shackleton'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: Rod Nelson <Rod.Nelson@enron.com>, "Pearce, Karola (Law)" <KKP2@pge.com>
		 Subject: RE: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of PG&E

Sara,

I am attaching our guarantee format for your review.  Please note that I
have inserted the "cap" at $ 10 million.

If you have any questions, please call me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara Shackleton [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Foley, Jack
Cc: Rod Nelson
Subject: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of PG&E

Jack:  I just spoke with Karola and she tells me that you want to talk about
the
guaranty.  I didn't recall if you had ever reviewed our proposed format.
Also,
I am aware that Enron Corp. previously issued a "General Guarantee
Agreememt" on
behalf of Enron North America Corp. (formerly, Enron Capital & Trade
Resources
Corp.) on January 28, 1998.  Which format are you interested in using?  Our
cap
for financial transactions with PG&E is, I believe, $10 million.  Please
give me
a call as I am the first point of contact for negotiating the guaranty.
Thanks.
Sara

 - EnronGnt.doc


Please generate master for my review.  Thank you.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 03:28 PM -----

	Jason R Williams@ENRON
	11/21/2000 01:11 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Master Physical for UGI Utilities

Dan & Debra -

Attached is a credit worksheet for a Master Firm Purchase/Sale for UGI
Utilities.  Please prepare a draft and send to Claire Neri at UGI at your
earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Jay Williams


Enjoy!
 - 20011223ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011223ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


Pablo,

Will you stop by when you get a chance to do the following:

1. set up network connection to laptop
2. download passport and gasselect on desktop and laptop
3. level the monitors

Thanks,
Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 03/11/2001 05:50
PM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel
03/06/2001 11:21 AM
To: Pablo Torres/Corp/Enron
cc: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Passport and Gasselect

Pablo,

Can you do this for Mike Grigsby?

Thanks,
Ina
---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 11:19 AM
---------------------------
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Passport and Gasselect

Ina,

Passport will probably need to be set up on Mike's desktop by an IT person.
Most of the time they have to copy the application from my desktop
to make it work. For Gasselect, I will check with Mike and see if it is
working. I believe all he needs is the login ID and password to make that
work.
If you need anything else, let me know.


I regret to announce that David Gallagher has decided to leave Enron.  David
has led our Continental Gas group for the last 2 years, and has built for us
a market leading franchise and the best team in the industry.  David is a
highly respected individual both within the company and outside the company,
and we will miss his professional attitude and great character.

He leaves a very strong team behind him.  Didier Magne and Carsten Sterz have
built this business with David from day one, and they will continue to own
their respective books: France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy and Spain for
Didier, and all the German-speaking countries plus Eastern Europe for
Carsten.  Dave Furner will continue to trade the Zeebrugge hub.  Nicola Craig
will continue to run the Continental option books.  Rudy Dautel, director,
will join the group as Head Trader, and Didier, Carsten and Nicola will
report to him.  Dave Furner will report to Didier Magne.  Rudy has a wealth
of trading experience in US nat gas, crude oil, UK nat gas, and most recently
Spanish power and LNG.  Rudy will report to me.
Steve Asplin, director, will head up large scale origination for Continental
gas, as distinct from the trading / mid-marketing functions of Didier and
Carsten.  Steve will report to me.
Cathy Christmas will continue with her key role as Head of Operations for the
group, reporting to David Hutchinson.
 All other reporting lines will remain the same.

Please join me in wishing David well for the future, and congratulating Rudy,
Steve, Carsten and Didier on their new and expanded roles.

Richard Lewis


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Nothing.  I will give you the print out along with the receipts to approve and once you sign off on it  I will go into the system and approve it.

Louise Kitchen
04/10/2001 03:54 PM
To:	tammie.schoppe@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - LK040401

What do I do with these?
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 03:53 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  eserver@enron.com                           04/04/2001 03:48 PM

To:	"louise.kitchen@enron.com" <louise.kitchen@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - LK040401

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Tammie Schoppe
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: LK040401
Report Total: $724.54
Amount Due Employee: $724.54

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 03:53 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  eserver@enron.com                           04/09/2001 10:42 AM

To:	"louise.kitchen@enron.com" <louise.kitchen@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - 04/02/01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Brian L. Redmond
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: 04/02/01
Report Total: $205.82
Amount Due Employee: $205.82

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 03:53 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  eserver@enron.com                           04/10/2001 03:43 PM

To:	"louise.kitchen@enron.com" <louise.kitchen@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - LK040501

The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: LK040501
Report Total: $823.04
Amount Due Employee: $823.04
Amount Approved: $823.04
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pending
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


At this point, yes, that's sort of how I feel about it.  Unless someone can
come up with some damned good reasons to do otherwise.


Do we include a 'confirmation' group in the plan - I am unsure where it falls on the front plan.

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Darren:
Please zero out the price on deal 384258 for 9/01 and add a demand fee for $2,861,611.46.

Thanks,
Megan


I have all the CES and CEM capacity releases in Sitara  We have;
 several contracts for Atlanta Gas Light - all CES,
 we have 3 small Boston Gas deals on 1 contract in Z6 - all CES
 we have 1 z3 to Z6 deal from S. Jersey - on CEM

I still need to enter the PSNC capacity from St 85 to PSNC - real low on my
priority list right now.

I sent Janet Edwards at CES a request to get ENA set up as agent for CEM -
this has not been done yet.

Please show this email to the CES Transco scheduler for confirmation.

ta da  :)


Molly,

This is the list of people we can ask to interview Iris.
I would include one (or possibly more) people from  each group below,
depending on availability.

1. Debbie Brackett or Bill Bradford
2. Ted Murphy, Bjorn Hagelman or David Port
3. Mark Tawney  or Joe Hrgovcic
4. Greg Whalley or Louise Kitchen

I shall send a message to them explaining that we try to identify the best
fit for a good
candidate.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           12/18/2000 11:57 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Iris Mack

Iris would like to come on Thursday, 12/28/2000, to visit with you and your
group.  She will be in New Orleans, and will just fly in for the day.

Molly


Here we go.........


Please see the attached revision to the meeting notes.  You will see the
change indicated in RED under Issue #2, Gas Daily.  We want to put this item
on HOLD for now because there are more implications to this change that we
need to resolve before coding begins.  The focus for now should be on putting
physical positions in TDS--identifying all issues associated with it, resolve
questions on where/how to get the position data, what should be filtered,
design of the new screens, etc.

Also, for your information--from now on we will be including Jeff Gossett and
Russ Severson in our weekly meetings as I believe they can help tremendously
with position reporting and how we currently get information from Sitara,
CPR, ERMS & TAGG.  I will send you all an e-mail on Monday letting you know
the time and place of next week's meeting.  Normally I want to hold the
meetings on Wednesday afternoons; however--next week I may have to move it to
Tuesday.  I will let you know first thing Monday morning.  Let me know if you
have any questions or concerns.


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
09/29/2000 02:13 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

I would like to take a day of vacation next Friday, October 6th if it ok.
Anita will be here.

Thanks!

Shirley


I am available at 1 pm.  Let me know if that still works for you.

	Heather Kroll
	03/04/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Let's meet tomorrow to discuss these contracts.  We need to put this issue to
bed fairly soon.  Are you available at 1:00?

Regards,

Heather

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather,  I did receive the Ash Handling Agreement from Bill White and I am
reviewing and should have comments shortly.  I  have not received the Coal
Handling Agreement yet from Kris' attorney.

	Heather Kroll
	02/27/2001 03:26 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Please give me an update on the redrafting of the ReUse agreements.  I
thought you told me that their attorneys were drafting, but from this e-mail
I don't think Kris Johnson is aware of that.  Please follow up with their
attorneys and let me know when to expect a new draft.

Regards,

Heather Kroll
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 04:24
PM ---------------------------

"Johnson, Kris" <KrisJohnson@Cogentrix.com> on 02/27/2001 02:51:36 PM
To: "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather:

Please give me a quick update on the status of the Lumberton and
Elizabethtown coal and ash contracts from Enron's perspective.  Are we still
shooting for a March 15th closing date.  As of now I will out of town on the
15th, but reachable.

Thanks, hope all is going well.

Kris Johnson
1-800-827-3873, ext. 105


Wes' memo finally went out to Sherriff.  DPR won't change at this point in
time.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 11:50 AM
---------------------------
From: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 08:10 AM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

There has been a fair amount of discussion about this as well as the
reporting of drift for the North America businesses.  Both Mike McConnell and
Jeff Shankman are opposed to moving the location of drift in the DPR.  I know
that North America included US drift in its plan and includes "drift
earnings" in its margin.  I believe you do the same in Europe.  Jeff is
adamant that we not  move US drift from EGM's section of the DPR and has
asked for UK drift to remain, as well.  You may want to call Jeff.  Sally and
I will do what ever you guys decide.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jeffrey A Shankman
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Wes Colwell
Cc: Sally Beck
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

Please deal with this.  Wes, you know what I think and what we've decided
on.  Jeff
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hickerson, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

FYI

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
07:21 AM ---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
02/27/2001 06:07 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Gary

I prepare the London Summary and I have been requested by John Sherriff here
in London to have changes made to the reporting format of the Executive
Viewer report.  John's request and the changes he has asked for are detailed
below.  In essence, John would like Enron Europe's 'UK Drift' revenue to be
reported under the 'Enron Europe' heading in the Exec Viewer instead of being
reported under the 'Global Markets' heading.  If you agree to this change
could you advise Chris Abel and Johnny Thibodeux to make the appropriate
changes.  If, however,  you would like to discuss the matter further please
contact John Sherriff.

Regards

Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Kass/EU/Enron on 27/02/2001 23:50
---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
23/02/2001 16:27
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Kass/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

Michael - Please move forward with these changes.

John

James New
23/02/2001 16:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

The attached is the format I believe we discussed and agreed with Ted a few
days ago. In order that the guys in Houston will make the changes they
require your authorisation.

If you can authorise by return then Michael Kass and I will forward it on to
the necessary people below.

If you are not happy with the attached please let me know what needs to be
changed.

Thanks James
---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 23/02/2001 16:14
---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
22/02/2001 10:47
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Changes are required to the reporting format of Enron Europe's P/L in the
Executive Viewer .  Below is a list of these changes as well as the person
responsible for effecting each change:

Gary Hickerson: The UK Drift book is to be reclassified from the 'Enron
Global Markets' heading to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Susie Ayala: The Enron Europe (Net Fair Value) Equity Investments book is to
reclassified from 'Merchant Summary' to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Chris Abel: The following changes are to be made to the books reported under
the 'Enron Europe' heading:
 - J Block is to be reported as a separate line item;
 - Structured Derivatives UK is to include all other structured derivatives
and power/gas accruals (currently reported under 'Other' line item);
 - For each of the Electricty books, could you change the word Electricity to
Power in the headings (for consistency purposes).


Thank you for attending one of the Executive Breakfasts held at DePelchin
Children,s Center this week. Seeing is believing.  I hope you enjoyed seeing
first hand how the dollars you give really do make a difference.

As was mentioned in the breakfasts, it is very easy to make your contribution
this year by simply clicking on the United Way link,
http://unitedway.enron.com or go directly to Internet Explorer or Netscape
and type in unitedway.enron.com in the address field.  Either option should
take you directly to Enron,s United Way 2000 Campaign site.  Pledge cards
will not be distributed this year, so please make your pledge electronically
- it only takes minutes!

Please call me at 713/853-3264 if you have questions or have any difficulties
at all accessing the site.

Thanks again! Your participation is important to the success of the campaign.


Aneela:

I received the referenced agreement in inter-office mail.  According to
Cheryl's latest report,  identical agreements were executed by both ENA and
ECT Investments, Inc. on or about 4/12/01.

What is it that you are asking us to do with the draft from "Jamie"?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: John Riggins [mailto:jriggins@hill-wilkinson.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Ryan Smith; Rusty Glover; Plemons Mike; Mike Plemons; Mike Eggleton;
Justin Biggs; Greg Barberee; Eric Fischer; Brady Jones; Archer Brent;
jlriggin@aol.com; Becky Riggins; gdfarley1@aol.com;
cwright3400@yahoo.com
Subject: FW: Heavy LOAD

John Riggins
Project Engineer
Hill & Wilkinson, Ltd.
800 Klein Road
Plano, TX 75074
214.507.1947

-----Original Message-----
From: Swanson Terry [mailto:tswanson@hill-wilkinson.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Everyone
Subject: FW:Heavy LOAD

This is why our superintendents do not drive cars >>>>>>>>>>> one of
them might try this.

?

?
 - HOMEDEPOT1.DOC


$0 bid for skip hicks


This is off the WPTF web site

http://www.wptf.org/contacts1.htm


As an update to portfolio, the Salomon Smith Barney  account was down 3.2% from Friday's close to Monday's close. NOT BAD  considering. I have also attached a survey of community foundations investment  results compile by Colonial Consulting Group. To put in context these results,  we were up 3.78%  for the 2nd quarter and down 1.47% year to date. From the  initiation of our diversification program in Jan. 2000, the portfolio through  the 2nd qtr of this year is up 3.22%.
Robert W. Paddock
Managing Director - Fund  Development
Greater Houston Community Foundation
713-960-1990bpaddock@ghcf.org
 - Survey Results 2nd qtr 2001.xls


Great background - hope you are well.

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martinez, Barbara
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	5th Conference in Monterrey

Nice picture!
 << File: 5th Conference in Mty.jpg >>


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/29/2001>, published as of 10/29/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Kate,

Please approve and autoschedule annuity # 580471. It's for 10/31/2000.

Les


You all should have received instruction from Sheila W. on the system for
salaries. I need that info late today so I can look at over the weekend.
Numbers are due Monday am. Rick


I'm not particularly wild about many of the changes proposed by GE.  Seems
that it would be a good idea to get a consensus on how to respond.  Here are
the issues I see:

Indemnity issues:
They should indemnify us from claims by their employees/subcontractors.
Indemnity should be triggered by strict liability as well as negligence.
What is a cognizant government?

Limit of liability issues:
They want to limit their indemnity obligation to 100% of purchase price.
They want the limit of liability to apply to gross negligence, if possible.
They don't want to clarify that they have to indemnify us for another party's
claim for consequentials (as in a personal injury claim).

We've don't have anything concrete on assignment yet.

Comments?

Sheila has asked that we change Wednesday's call to 1100 Central, or 100
Central if 1100 doesn't work.  Is this a problem?

Kay

They should have to
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/11/2000 04:07
PM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 09/07/2000 07:46:07 PM
To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Sheila.Tweed.@enron.com,
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
Martin.W.Penkwitz@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: GE Language

Folks,

Having conferred at last with my colleagues, I can now forward to you our
draft language for the Indemnity and LOL clauses.  As Steve mentioned in his
earlier message, he has suggested some issues to discuss which could bring
us closer to resolution on that issue.  Please let me know if you have any
question!

Best regards,

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - MajorClausesGE01.doc


Mark -

 I need your advice and help with this revision to an EnronOnline location
description.
Dick Jenkins is concerned with contractual problems and requests an urgent
revision to the location description (TETCO M3) that follows:

The transaction is for delivery at Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. - Zone M3.

He wants to ensure that the delivery shall also include anywhere on the M3.
Therefore, I have revised the location to the following:

The transaction is for delivery at Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. - Zone
M3, and all downstream delivery on the M3.

Please advise if this is appropriate as we need to get a ticker item posted
on the website as soon as possible.

Thanks -

Rob
x35491


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041712.txt


Jim and Jeff --

I spoke with Brian Cragg about the Commission's adjustment of QF prices.  He
said that to date they have only done it on a going forward basis.  They did
say when they issued their decision in March which changed the formula for
QF  pricing that they were going to continue their examination of the
formula inputs and additional future changes could be made retroactive to
March.  To date they have not taken further action.

In the past, when the Commission has made changes to rates to reflect
overcollections or undercollections, they have not gone back and
recalculated each bill. The corrections are made on a going forward basis.
Thus in the case of the PX energy charge, the energy charge on customer's
future bills would be reduced to reflect the past over payments.
Conversely, the PX credit would be reduced to reflect the fact that they
were to high in the past.

Jeanne

-----Original Message-----
From: James.D.Steffes@enron.com [mailto:James.D.Steffes@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 8:57 AM
To: JBennett@GMSSR.com; jdasovic@enron.com; James_D_Steffes@enron.com
Subject: RE: CPUC Authority to Adjust Rates

Jeanne --

Not quite sure that I am getting the picture.  Let me lay it out more
directly.

The PX Credit for October 2000 was $225 based on the actual market rates.

Now FERC is saying that October 2000 hourly prices for CalPX DA and CalPX
HA markets were "too high" in June 2001.  Can the CPUC change the PX Credit
for October 2000 and make the Utilities recalculate our Negative CTC?

What is prospective?  Have they ever done this before?

Jim

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-JBennett+20+3CJBennett+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 7:35 PM
   To:     Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Jim Steffes (E-mail)
   Subject:  CPUC Authority to Adjust Rates

   Jeff and Jim --

   I have done some research into the issue of whether the CPUC would be
   able
   to restate the UDC's PX Energy Charges (and thus PX Credits) back to
   October
   if the FERC were to apply its mitigation plan back that far. Thus far,
   my
   research indicates that the answer is yes (or at least there is a strong
   argument that the answer is yes) and it would not violate the rule
   against
   retroactive rate making.  The reasoning is as follows:

   The Commission (as affirmed by the courts) have ruled that they may
   subject
   a utility's rates to refund to account for adjustments made pursuant to
   a
   methodology or formula adopted before the date the utility's rates
   became
   subject to refund. Thus any ratemaking is considered prospective because
   the
   formulas are in place before the utility's rates are made subject to
   refund.
   The PX Energy Charge is calculated pursuant to the formula/mechanism set
   forth in the utility's tariffs.  These charges were always subject to
   adjustment on a prospective basis due to the settlement process.  The
   change
   in energy prices which would be effected by the FERC ruling could very
   well
   be viewed as an adjustment made pursuant to a formula.  Thus the change
   would not be considered retroactive ratemaking.

   I had a chance to talk with Mike Day for a couple of minutes about this
   issue.  He concurred with my analysis.

   Jeanne

   P.S. Please forward this e-mail to anyone you think needs to see it.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Ted Murphy, Tom Bauer, Jim Brown and I met yesterday to schedule the next
series of operations/controls reviews of Enron offices or certain companies
in which Enron holds an ownership interest.   Attached is a copy of that
schedule.  Please contact Ted or me if you have any questions.  You will note
that the full make-up of the teams is being worked on currently.  We have
identified the lead on each review, however, from RAC, Operations and AA.


Hey guys.  Let's try this.  Take the data from 2000 and change the
following.  Take Keystone West volumes to 850,000/d rateably, then add the
new gen numbers posted below.  You will need to add this demand to the EOC S
ML demand numbers (Is Salmayuca included in this number?).  We should use the
2000 waha west volumes for now.  You should end up with reduced ehrenberg
volumes for the reduction in Keystone west volumes and the addition of New
Gen demand.  Run the storage balance at 2000 Socal in this scenario.  We will
then plug forward with waha west volumes to balance Socal in 2001.  Also, add
columns to adjust (90%, 60%, 50%, etc) the burns for new gen in SW.  We
should then look to adjusting socal demand down for the high hydro/increased
NW imports to CA scenario that could happen.  Use the SP-15 2000 gen numbers
and then back out the avg of 1999 and 2000 power imports.  I would like to
avoid averaging 1999 and 2000 socal gas demand. Use a 10,000 heat rate to
reduce gas demand.  Have Jay adjust EOC demand for normal weather.  We may
have to refer to the load sensitivity data from west power to reduce the SW
electric loads and then back out of gen numbers using a 10,000 heat rate.  We
will then be exposed to EPNG and the OPS increasing Keystone west volumes
between now and next summer - run the 2001 with this possibility as well.
Take Key West to 1.1 bcf.  Let me know where my errors in approach may be.

This should give us a picture of the Socal deliverability for 2001.

Thanks,
Mike


I'm thinking 3 and 4 are not as nice as 5 and 6, but that this would be OK, and preferable to moving to the North Tower and that we should be trying for a longer lease, with breaks we can exercise at our option. We should be in a good negotiating position.

Thought?

Dave
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Bridges@ubsw.com <Mark.Bridges@ubsw.com>
To: Forster, David <David.Forster@ENRON.com>; louise@enron.com <louise@enron.com>; Pat.ODonnell@ubsw.com <Pat.ODonnell@ubsw.com>
CC: Beth.Barrett@ubsw.com <Beth.Barrett@ubsw.com>; bdugan@ubspw.com <bdugan@ubspw.com>
Sent: Mon Jan 28 08:56:04 2002
Subject: Real estate issues re: UBSW Energy, LLC in Houston

Hello Pat, Louise, Dave

The UBSW real estate department is reviewing the current/future lease
terms for UBSW Energy LLC, in Houston.  According to Brian Dugan, our
lead real estate guy on the bank side, the building owner has offered
a nine month lease to stay in the South Tower on the 5th and 6th
floors.  After the nine months we will be offered the option to sign
up for an additional 18 months but we could be moved down to floors 3
and 4.  Is this a significant issue?  I understand that the 3rd and
4th floor foot prints are similar to 5/6.

If UBSW Energy is willing to relocate to the North Tower, they can
get a lease for 5-9 years but this tower may be less suitable.  What
are the issues here?

The integration real estate team plans to meet this afternoon with
the Bank's outside legal firm we use for real estate issues.  We have
a target date of this Friday to try to resolve all real estate issues
in order to meet the DAY 0 legal integration date of 2/6/02.

Your thoughts please.

Mark

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


You still have access to test - the data is just old - but strangely won't effect you too much.   Doubt it will be refreshed - due to production being the priority.

Stephanie will set you up in the new production by the end of the day.  Don't get too excited - it all looks the same.
All the programming effort has been put on the website.

Temporary link to new production cluster

http://remoteservices.netco.enron.com/   (select - UBSWenergy Cluster)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 4:40 PM
To:	Engel, Tom
Subject:	RE: EOL access

Thanks,

Will the test database be converted by Thursday?  We will be unable to verify that the deals are bridging correctly unless we can see the EOL reports.

Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Engel, Tom
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 4:36 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: EOL access

You will have access soon - Stephanie will send you your ID's and passwords.

We have a lot of work to do in there - so we don't want everyone in there quite yet.  The problem is - if traders are playing with the products while we are trying to re-build the products and data elements with UBS names - we are going to have issues.

The other thing I want to make sure everyone understands - this is our new production data base - not a test data base.
There are a limited number of authorized users assigned to "testing" or playing around with the data - and they are responsible for cleaning it up too.
We will allow people to play for the simulation only.

Once we finish building our UBS production data base - we will the copy it to our test data base - and resume our bridge testing from there to the other test environments (our test environment still has the old Enron data).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 3:18 PM
To:	Engel, Tom
Subject:	EOL access

Tom,

Everyone in risk management needs to get access to EOL bridge monitor and reports.  What do we need to do to get this and how soon can it be granted?  We need this by Thursday to be prepared for testing.

Thanks

Kam


Kim and Michelle,

	Attached is a revised version of the capacity release letter agreement, which is red-lined toshow changes from the prior draft.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	james_mcdonnell@ca.campbellsoup.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-james+5Fmcdonnell+40ca+2Ecampbellsoup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:26 PM
To:	james.galea@sympatico.ca
Cc:	mvanrassel@rpmtec.com; mitchmilestone@home.com; CJONES@mackenziefinancial.com; jonch@magic.pmh.on.ca; lavorato@enron.com; Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com
Subject:	Re: real picture or not

Scary yes, but how can you even consider it's reality?  How the hell do you
think they developed the film?  It's not likely, given their proximity to
the approaching plane, that they would have had a rat's ass chance in hell
of escape.  Use your noodle you MBA pencil neck!

MMMPPPACKER

james.galea@sympatico.ca on 09/27/2001 02:02:14 PM

Please respond to james.galea@sympatico.ca

 To:       mvanrassel@rpmtec.com

 cc:       mitchmilestone@home.com, James
           McDonnell/CA/CAMPSOUP/CSC@CSC,
           CJONES@mackenziefinancial.com,
           jonch@magic.pmh.on.ca, lavorato@enron.com,
           Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com

 Subject:  real picture or not

Guys:

I'm not sure this picture is for real, but it's scary enough anyway.

James

(See attached file: missing.jpg)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
confidential information and is intended solely for use by
the individual to whom it is addressed.  If you received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender, do not
disclose its contents to others and delete it from your
system.

**********************************************************************

 - missing.jpg


As a follow-up to my memo re: tax treaty countries, I called Jeff Blumenthal
about Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania & Venezuela, since they were not on the list
and in a separate memo, and he said that they adopted tax treaties after the
Tax Code binder was published.


Paul:

Thanks for the e-mail.  I agree with your assessment.  I also want to thank
you for your support of the legal department.  We feel like we are part of
the team and I appreciate your efforts in that regard.

Take care,

Mark


Good point.  Thanks.  Should we tell HR that so they are straight on what each company is doing?
	Just a thougt.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: Differential Pay for November

Florida said since Mary Lou is working from home no one get's differential pay.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Garcia, Ava
Subject:	RE: Differential Pay for November

	Ava, what about Florida?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Southard, Miranda
Cc:	Blair, Jean; Blair, Lynn; Hernandez, Bert; Minter, Tracy
Subject:	Differential Pay for November

Miranda the following are those who will get differential pay for the month of November:

Jean Blair, North Team, for 11/15 Bert Hernandez, TW,  will get differential pay and for 16/30 Tracy Minter, TW, will receive differential pay.

I know I am late and apologize if you have any problems please let me know.

Thanks,
Ava-35842


I'll try to find one.

D

Darnellmo@aol.com on 01/29/2001 04:15:04 PM
To: darron.c.giron@enron.com
cc:
Subject: mom is in trouble now

ok, here is the story...I cannot seem to find the voice thing for your
auburn
tiger. ?I tried to find a web site to order the guy another one and can't
find that either. ?Name is silly slammers.. please order another one for
him;
I will repay you..Probably as soon as the new one comes in I will fnd the
old
one. ?Sorry about that. MOM ?????????

That dealership in brooklyn that refurnishes those cars I told you about is
called Fast Action Car Dealership..couldn't find that site either.

You and your brother need to think about the sept trip to Estes Park...I
want
to make reservations soon. ?I realize that you already have a trip planned
to
CO this year, ?and am not sure if your KS cousins will even be there, but we
need to talk about this. ?Lar and I are going irregardless of who goes...the
more I look up about this place the more I like it. ?MOM


Since Hiring Greg Wolfe and another marketer, AEP has been going after a lot of people in our Portland office.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoppe, Tammie   On Behalf Of Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:36 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	AEP hired our credit person in Portland

Not good.
Tracey Ngo was excellent.
Huge salary increase and sign on.


Here are my corrections/concerns/questions about the EPMI portion of the
filing.

We need to coordinate this with PGE and Enron Wind and make sure they file to
revise their tariffs and agree to the change of the code of conduct.  Are you
handling that Sarah or do you want me to?
The filing and tariff do not include the Commission approved FTR sales into
California, that needs to be added.
Do we have any idea how close the SEC is to ruling?  It's my recollection
that FERC does not like indefinite notice periods, as we have requested, nor,
under their rules, do they permit a notice period of longer than 120 days.
Has counsel looked at whether FERC has made special exceptions for mergers?