EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		== One click feeds one person ==
		Please join Emazing in helping feed thousands of people who would otherwise
go hungry this holiday season.  When you click on www.givingpool.org today,
Zthing.com will donate $1.12 to provide a meal for one person - just for
visiting the site! Click  here for more details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Friday December 29, 2000

		Luke 2.34

		The Access Bible, NRSV, New Testament, Page 85-86

		"Then Simeon blessed them and said to his mother Mary, 'This child is
destined for the falling and the rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign
that will be opposed . . . .'"

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		[IMAGE]

		Resolve to ring in the New Year right...
		With EMAZING Greetings! Let our fun, FREE, and easy-to-send Greeting Cards
help you keep up with all the special and everyday occasions the new year
brings.

		It's never too late... Flooz 'em, baby!
		Flooz - the online gift currency you send by email

		FREE $5 for 1st Time Buyers at HALF.com
		Half.com is the hottest site for used CDs, DVD,s, Books & Video Games!

		Get satellite television in only one step.
		Click here for more information on FREE satellite TV!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Neale Donald Walsch: Communion With God

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Robert Powell: Jesus of Nazareth

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Bill O'Reilly: The O'Reilly Factor

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		The Jimi Hendrix Experience

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		Sony eMarker

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		The Sopranos - The Complete First Season

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		Al Pacino: The Godfather Collection

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo.
		- H. G. Wells

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  Another new year...
		Another reason to send an EMAZING Greeting Card! 2001 is going to be full of
birthdays, anniversaries, holidays and everyday occasions. Don't miss
out--send a FREE and fun EMAZING Greeting Card today! Click  here for more
details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


Per Shari this a.m., we had already requested an update on Ritch, Heather's
legal advice from another law firm in Mexico, Lopez Vallardi.  You have
already authorized payment of the bill.  The fax requesting an update from
Ritch, Heather went out yesterday.  What would you like to do?


> > >"You Were an Accident!"
> > >
> > >"Strangers Have the Best Candy"
> > >
> > >"The Little Sissy Who Snitched"
> > >
> > >"Some Kittens Can Fly!"
> > >
> > >"Getting More Chocolate on Your Face"
> > >
> > >"Where Would You Like to Be Buried?"
> > >
> > >"Kathy Was So Bad Her Mom Stopped Loving Her"
> > >
> > >"The Attention Deficit Disorder Association's Book of Wild Animals of
> > >North Amer... Hey!  Let's Go Ride Our Bikes!"
> > >
> > >"All Dogs Go to Hell!"
> > >
> > >"The Kids' Guide to Hitchhiking"
> > >
> > >"When Mommy and Daddy Don't Know the Answer They Say 'God Did It'"
> > >
> > >"Garfield Gets Feline Leukemia"
> > >
> > >"What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?"
> > >
> > >"Why Can't Mr. Fork and Ms. Electrical Outlet Be Friends?"
> > >
> > >"Bi-Curious George"
> > >
> > >"Daddy Drinks Because You Cry"
> > >
> > >"Mister Policeman Eats His Service Revolver"
> > >
> > >"You Are Different and That's Bad"
> > >
> > >"Dad's New Wife... Timothy"
> > >
> > >"Pop!  Goes The Hamster (and Other Great Microwave Games)"
> > >
> > >"Testing Homemade Parachutes With Nothing At All But Your Household
> > Pets"
> > >
> > >"The Hardy Boys, the Barbie Twins and the Vice Squad"
> > >
> > >"The Tickling Babysitter"
> > >
> > >"Babar Meets the Taxidermist"
> > >
> > >"Curious George and the High-Voltage Fence"
> > >
> > >"The Boy Who Died from Eating All His Vegetables"
> > >
> > >"Start a Real-Estate Empire With the Change From Your Mom's Purse"
> > >
> > >"The Pop-up Book of Human Anatomy"
> > >
> > >"Things Rich Kids Have, But You Never Will!"
> > >
> > >"The Care Bears Maul Some Campers and are Shot Dead"
> > >
> > >"How to Become The Dominant Military Power In Your Elementary School"
> > >
> > >"Controlling the playground: Respect through Fear"
> >
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


this guy is a regular carl lewis
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------

Matthew Lenhart
08/25/2000 02:55 PM
To: shelliot@dttus.com
cc:

Subject: Do not try this at home - its more painful then it looks. :)

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000
03:55 PM ---------------------------

Stacy Chang <Schang@cook-inlet.com> on 08/25/2000 02:49:15 PM
To: Matthew Lenhart <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Do not try this at home - its more painful then it looks. :)

 Do not try this at home - its more painful then it looks. :)

  <<pool.mpg>>

 - pool.mpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000
07:54 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 01/30/2000 03:43:57 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

 - ED_c06_Sim&Trees.doc


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfax.com to today's gas & power prices & news.
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

Delete fermis@enron.com by forwarding to web@enerfax.com


Hey Clem can you help us out with this one?  What are the volumes and deal
tickets in question for those two days and what is the location?  We
delivered to you at Centana and Enerfin.  Didn't we have that famous
HPL/TETCO OBA already set up to handle the small volumes that are leftover
after our deliveries to you?  Please let us know thanks!

Jackie Young
12/14/2000 08:59 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy

Victor,

I didn't know that this was you!  I just snapped at the name.  What's up?

Here's the deal.  Enerfin has changed the OBA's effective date again.  It now
is not effective until 12/2000.  Clem says that it's okay but we have to go
back and change up previous months and have the OBA removed and show the
effective date for 12/2000.  Clem is the point person on this.

If need be, come on down and we'll talk.

Bye

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           12/13/2000 05:39 PM

To: Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy

Is this Enerfin gas we delivered?  What are the deal numbers in Sitara and
how much volume are we talking about?
Darren, Isn't there an OBA set up in Enerfin that can handle small volumes?
THANKS

	From:  Meredith Mitchell                           12/12/2000 08:34 AM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL discrepancy

Victor,

What's your opinion on this?  Can we go back and add days to prior month
deals?  Do we use the same price?  If we do decide to do this, we will need
to get TETCO to agree to do a retro for those days as well.

Jackie Young
12/11/2000 03:53 PM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 10/2000 - Days 6 and 19 (98-0439)

The above referenced days have been placed on strangers gas due to (I guess)
the meter not being turned off in time.  The day prior to each of these days
that are assessed to strangers gas, the only active K is the HPL 216.

Can these deals be rolled to cover these couple of days?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


As you know, we are continuously updating the Foreign & Domestic Counsel database so that it can be maintained in the most accurate form; therefore, any new information you may have regarding outside counsel firms that have been interviewed and/or retained in the past 12 months would be greatly appreciated.  Also, if you have any updates to the existing database entries we would also like to hear from you.

Please take the time to help us update this database so it can be a valuable tool for all of us!  Each one of us has full access to the database via your Lotus Notes application; however, if your icon has disappeared from your desktop, click here to add it back on to your desktop >>>>>

Please provide any new information and/or updates either to Nony Flores or Becky Spencer.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

<Embedded StdOleLink>


I'm sorry, but I can't give you full credit on your answer to the second part
of my question. The correct answer was the author's use of the word
"stunning" to describe the $6.2 billion figure. The word is clearly an
editorialization on the amount of the refund requested, and is therefore
journalistically incorrect.  In addition, you failed to extemporize on why a
journalist for an energy trade magazine would leave such gaping holes in
his/her story.

But because I'm feeling lenient this morning, I'll give you the details.

There was no date.

Kate


Ken,  I thought it would be better if I typed my thoughts for you since my
hand writing can be somewhat difficult to read.

Before you decide the methodology for moving our project beyond the D. Ambani
phone call, I would like to share a few thoughts that I believe reduces the
risk of Enron being an E&P buyer.  I know the implications of making a large
E&P purchase are far greater than just the cash requirement, but I believe
with the following changes to the plan presented yesterday and a little 3rd
party information, you may feel more comfortable making this decision.  Under
the buy/sell arrangement a small risk of buying will always be present, but I
believe the risk reward ratio in this case has very strong merit.  My goals
for Enron are three fold; a) sale the assets, b) get cash in the door before
year-end, and c) get fair value for the assets given the current situation.
My comments touch upon five topics:

1)  Reverse the buy/sell process giving Enron the control vote
2)  Pay the Penalty
3) Contact someone at the Janus Fund to talk about Reliance's Financial
condition
4) Thoughts on non-Reliance bidder's
5) Information and the future process

Reverse the Buy/Sell Process:   The plan outlined yesterday using the
buy/sell scenario is the best scenario for achieving all of our goals.  The
risk for Enron which is most troubling is the possibility of being a buyer
versus a desire to be a seller.  I firmly believe if we make one change to
the plan as described below, we can increase our probability of a successful
sale to near 100%.  If we don't use a but/sell arrangement I am concerned
that we will not get fair value or cash in the door this year.   In fact, I
suspect we will elect not to sell because of contract or valuation problems,
which in effect leave us with a stranded asset and a lot of employee
problems.

When you talk with Dhirubhai we can propose the buy/sell concept  with RIL
making the first bid to purchase.  Enron then has the right to sell at that
price or increase the bid by 5% and RiL must sell.  Since we are now in the
control position the 10% tax logic we talked about yesterday no longer is
valid, so I would describe the 5% as a control premium.  The only reason we
want the buy option is in the event they offer a very low number.  I would
suspect them to bid in the $550 to $650 million range.  They just turned down
my offer to purchase their assets at $450mm and indicated we were
substantially below their value when I tried to engage them in a dialogue.
They know Enron paid $620 million just 12 months ago for the same position.
We know they internally have reserves booked higher than ours and have a
strong desire to have a substantial upstream position that they can control.
It is possible that RIL would bid less than $500 million but I put that
probability at less than one percent.  This reduces Enron's risk dramatically
and increases our probability of getting all of our objectives met. We also
get an added benefit, from pitching the deal with RIL as the first bidder,
because this will  strengthen the perception that we (Enron) want to be the
buyer, which is a key perception to have a fair auction with only one
legitimate buyer, Reliance.

If we  pitch the deal as suggested above,  we need to recognise going in that
they probably want the control position as well.  I believe they would pay a
very large value for these assets due to their tax position and by bidding
first they take great risk of leaving a lot of money on the table or not
getting the deal at all.   I would suspect that they will at a minimum
suggest we flip a coin to see who bids first.  Initially I would just say no,
but we may need to deal with this issue and probably should decide early on
if it is a deal killer.  If we did flip a coin, we would wait until the
documents were final and the escrow agreement was signed so there would be no
backing out without a penalty.  In this scenario it would actually help get a
more impartial document done quicker if neither party knew the bidding
sequence until after the drafting was finalized.

Pay the Penalty: While it is not the way we want to do business, the worst
case scenario under the proposed escrow agreement is to forfeit  $25 million
if we elected not to follow through in an Enron  buy scenario.   Considering
the upside to the buy/sell under either sequence (Enron first or RIL first)
it may be worth the risk of losing the escrow under a black Friday scenario.
I want to think about this over the weekend, but while I was thinking this
afternoon the risk reward seems to be very favorable.

Contact someone at Janus Fund:  This was suggested yesterday and I would
strongly urge you to do this if you feel comfortable making the inquiry.
Janus bought approximately a  5% position in RIL about 1-2 months ago.  I
think you will get a very positive report on both the cash front and their
desire to make the upstream a key part of the company.

Thoughts on Non- Reliance Bidders:  I have spent a lot more time thinking
about this issue.   I can talk you through the reasons, but as long as
Reliance is involved and a western company can only purchase a 30%
non-operated working interest, we will have to take a huge discount to fair
value.  I will be very surprised if we could get $450 million.  Again, going
to the Shell's, BG's,,,etc  early on in the process,  I believe, is a huge
mistake, both internally and externally.

Information Flow and Process:  Ken this is a very sensitive area but I feel
compelled to mention this to you.  I am concerned about too many people
knowing our plan and strategy and possibly others wanting to branch out with
the intentions of helping, but actually causing problems.  This needs to be
managed by one person, not three or four.  To meet all of our objectives this
has to be an orchestrated deal from a to z.  I think you know more about my
background then most others in Enron.  I worked the E&P M&A business for 10
years and did pretty well at it.  I know the oil business and I believe that
is a key to getting a good deal done.  I know these assets and all of the
complex issues surrounding the assets, our subsidiaries, tax issues and the
book considerations.  I'm the best person to get this deal done once you
decide the risk the company is willing to take.  I know the limits of my
authority and I will work within those bounds and keep the OOC completely and
totally informed so proper decisions can be made when necessary.

Ken, I promise you I will use others in the company where and when
appropriate.  If I need help in India, I would not hesitate to ask Sanjay for
such.  However, the last thing we can afford is excess discussion in India on
this deal.  If Dhirubhai agrees to the deal, we need to get a meeting set in
Europe at a neutral site to start the process.  My main objective is to  have
a successful deal.

I have decided not to go to India so we can concentrate on moving this
forward.  Also, I will need your guidance on the future of the E&P plans for
Enron when we decide the direction we plan to take on Panna, Mukta and
Tapti.  I have looked at the key people necessary to make this happen and can
talk to you about that as well if you so desire.

Thanks
jeff


4 counterparties for a total of $10.2MM makes me think that each one must be
pretty large.  I am copying Leslie on this note, as I would like to know the
names of the counterparties in the over 90 day bucket and how many dollars
are associated with each one -- also how likely we think that collection is
in each case.

Leslie:  I know that it may be that reconciliation is not far enough along at
this point to provide this kind of detail, but it is the type of question
that Dave may ask.

Lisa B Cousino
09/27/2000 02:19 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A/R Question on Counterparties for Delainey report

Sally - I checked into the number of counterparties that we included in the
A/R balances that were being reconciled.  It is 4 as stated below.  Please
let me know if you need anything else.  I did deliver copies of they July and
August report to Tammie Shepherd.

Lisa

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
02:11 PM ---------------------------

Brian Heinrich
09/27/2000 01:11 PM
To: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Question - Delaney Report

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Heinrich/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------
To: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Heinrich/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Re: Question - Delaney Report

Actually, counting the monetized counterparty that we lumped in it would be 4
counterparties.

Audrey Cook
09/26/2000 02:42 PM
To: Brian Heinrich/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Question - Delaney Report

Brian,
The answer to your question regarding the number of counterparties in
"reconciliation status" on the Delaney Report is 3.  Let me know if you have
any further questions.  Thanks
ajc


New Hours for the Credit Union

Beginning Monday, March 18,
 StarTrust Federal Credit Union's* new hours will be
 Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 4:30 pm,
including Teller Services and Financial Services.

Remember that QuickLink Internet Account Access, Anytime Loans, our Web Portal,
and our other electronic services are available to you 24x7!

* Formerly Enron Federal Credit Union


Sally and Ted

I have attached both our Project Objectives package and the Remote Office
Questionnaire that we plan to
complete while at the various offices.  Please review at your convenience and
let us know your comments.

Thank you and have a good weekend

Regards
Kate Agnew


The only ID we have for Tristar, an NNG customer, is Kevin Herrmann.

Deborah
HotTap Helpdesk
3-6063

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	sblaydes@tristargas.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	hottap@enron.com
Subject:	New Reports

I have two questions about the Service Requester Scheduled Quantity report
that came on line this week:

1.  Does it have to be legal size?  The previous report was very readable
and it was 8 1/2 x 11, landscape

2.  This report gives no month-to-date totals and now I have to get two
reports on each pipeline every day in order to reconcile our system
correctly.  Is there any way the first page of the old report could be added
to this report so that month-to-date totals can be seen?


Thanks, John, I will add Sarita to my "cc" list.    And, yes, we'll get both you and Phil on Stan's calendar to go over the "Operations Alliances" topic...I will await their call to schedule.

Cindy

From:	John Shafer/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/15/2001 07:32 PM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	RE: ETS Staff Meeting Schedule Changes for the Remainder of May

Cindy,
Will you please add my new Administrative Assistant to your future "cc" lists?  She is Sarita Garza.  Thanks so much.  John

P.S.  I have asked Sarita and Amelia to get with you and see when a favorable date would be that Phil Lowry and I could have about 30 minutes with Stan to go over the "Operations Alliances" with him (since his half day staff meeting was cancelled for May 16).  Anyway, this is just a heads-up that they will be in touch to get a date confirmed.  Thank you.  JHS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stark, Cindy   On Behalf Of Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Tuesday, May 15, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Hotte, Steve; Hayslett, Rod; Hartsoe, Joe; Lowry, Phil; Fossum, Drew; McCarty, Danny; Smith, Gary P.; Prentice, James; Vonderheide, Scott; Harris, Steven; Neubauer, Dave; Hayes, Robert; McCoppin, Dorothy; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay; Pribble, Dan; Nelson, Michel; Rice, Randy; Keller, John; Shafer, John; Peters, Jerry; McGowan, Mike W.; Martin, Jerry D.
Cc:	Benner, Martha; Winters, Ricki; Rita Houser/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON; Campos, Kathy; Hawkins, Bernadette; Alder, Amelia; Sellers, Emily; Armstrong, Julie; Perry, Carolyn; Hogan, Janice; Cappiello, Deborah; Alexander, Betty; Kovalcik, Tammy; Solon, Sharon; Paschal, Zelda; Gallishaw, Melinda; Ladish, Kim; Kudym, Judy
Subject:	ETS Staff Meeting Schedule Changes for the Remainder of May
Importance:	High

This is to advise you that we have canceled next Monday's (May 21) 9:15AM ETS Staff Meeting and will resume the following week on Tuesday (May 29) from 9:30 to 11:00AM in 49C2.

NOTE:  Next week, in the absence of our staff meeting, Stan would like you to send him (via electronic mail) brief, updated bullet points.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks,
Cindy
X36197


Mark just had to run down quick to a meeting.  When he gets out we'll give
you a call & go over this stuff.  We really appreciate your help!


Didja git aneeonnya?

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Chet Fenner; Joe Parks; Brian Constantine; Brad Corrier; EriK Wollam
Subject: Last night!

UUhh..what happened to ya'll last night. Thanks for blowing it off w/o letting me know. Ritas were good and plenty, had a few and decided to stick it out alone.  Actually met a whole new PILE of friends there.

HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!!!


Attached is the April 2001 nomination for our takes under the Gas Sales and
Purchase Contract between TXU Fuel Company (previously TUFCO) and SDS.  Please
advise should you have any questions concerning the attached.

Thanks,
CCS

(See attached file: SDSNOM.xls)

 - SDSNOM.xls


Mr. Nimocks,

Greg has decided that he would like to do the 90-minute panel.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor

"Bob Nimocks" <bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com> on 08/23/2000 09:05:45 AM
To: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Liz,

We're considering one of two options:

In the first, Greg would make an independent 20 to 25-minute presentation
followed with 10 to 15 minutes of Q&A. Tim Ling, chairman of TradeRanger,
will open the keynote session at 8:10 with a discussion of the evolution of
his procurement hub and how he and his senior management team intend to
manage fourteen disparate buying organizations through one e-marketplace
representing $120 billion in annual spending.  Tim will be followed by a
McKinsey director, likely to be Ron Hulme or Scott Nyquist, who will discuss
e-business strategy conclusions that McKinsey has drawn concerning the
energy industry.  Greg will then follow in the lineup depending on whether
we start upstream and move down, or vice versa.  We finish at 11:00.

In the second option, Greg would participate in a 90-minute panel with two
to three other executives and moderated by the director from McKinsey. Under
this scenario, Ling opens and is followed by the McKinsey presentation.  The
director then will moderate a panel of three to four executives: Greg; John
Leggate, Group Vice President, IT at BP; Greg Vesey, head of e-business at
Texaco; and/or Brad Kitterman, VP North America, Schlumberger Resource
Management Services.   Each executive would have 10-15 minutes to discuss
his business model and the key issues that the industry must consider during
the next year, followed by Q&A to the entire panel.

Let me know if Greg has a preference to one of these two scenarios and we'll
try to accommodate it.

About the audience:
The audience is consistently made up of a confluence of energy and
technology executives.  About 30% will be comprised of energy professionals
interested in wholesale and retail trading.  For example, we already have
some 70 European gas and electricity executives scheduled to attend.
Cisco's London Office is arranging a Pan American tour for these executives
with a stop at Interactive Energy. Many other wholesale and retail merchants
will also be in attendance, including some large industrial buyers.  Heads
of energy procurement from Ford, United Technologies and e-Mall's (an
eight-state buying consortium's) have attended in the past.

Please let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com]On Behalf Of
Greg.Whalley@enron.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 7:06 PM
To: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com
Subject: RE: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Mr. Nimocks,

How long are you wanting Greg to speak?  What's the format for the
presentations?  Will there be a Q& A after the presentation?

Many Thanks,

Liz

"Bob Nimocks" <bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com> on 08/22/2000 04:31:21 PM

To:   <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Thanks, Liz. I'll keep my fingers crossed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com]On Behalf Of
Greg.Whalley@enron.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:21 PM
To: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com
Subject: Re: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Mr. Nimocks,

I don't know if you have spoken w/Greg as of yet.  However, I do know he is
trying very hard to work this into his schedule.  I'll get w/him again
tomorrow morning for an answer.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley

"Bob Nimocks" <bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com> on 08/22/2000 11:18:54 AM

To:   <whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Greg,
Certainly hope you can join us for the keynote session to describe one
year's experience with EOL and what's in store next.  Tim Ling, chairman of
TradeRanger -- the fourteen-company procurement consortium with BP Amoco,
Shell, Unocal, Total Fina and others -- has confirmed.  Still working with
the others.
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nimocks [mailto:bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:20 AM
To: whalley@enron.com
Subject: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

August 17, 2000

Greg Whalley
Vice Chairman & CEO, Enron Net Works LLC
Managing Director, Enron Corp.
PO Box 1188
Houston, TX  77251-1188

VIA E-MAIL: WHALLEY@ENRON.COM

Dear Greg:

To follow with my phone message, please consider accepting a keynote speech
for Interactive Energy, Tuesday morning, Oct. 24, in Houston. We've
confirmed either the head of the E-Commerce Practice or the North American
Energy Practice from McKinsey and have issued invitations to Tim Ling, the
chairman of TradeRanger (the Shell, BP, Unocal procurement hub), and John
Leggate, Group Vice President, IT at BP.

Interactive Energy has grown to be the largest and most prestigious
e-strategy event (see www.interactiveenergy.com).  Skilling gave the
keynote
last year, announcing the launch of Enron Online. Divisional presidents
from
Halliburton, Equiva, Vastar and Reliant Energy participated in the keynote
session.  More than 1,450 executives attended.  Given the large number of
early registrations and the strong program, we expect this year's to be
much
larger.

Ideally, you would give a one-year update on the growth of the EOL and
describe your vision for Enron's future e-business initiatives and
objectives in this area.  The target audience for the conference is senior
energy management who are integrating technology into their core business
strategies.

Interactive Energy 2000, which will have more than 100 speakers, will cover
technology development across five sectors:

1) Upstream
2) Transportation & Logistics
3) Processes (refining, petrochem, power gen. and gas processing)
4) Wholesale
5) Retail

Press Coverage:
The conference has been a high priority for the trade press as well as the
general media.  At previous years' events, we had editors from more than
twenty general business and trade publications, including the Wall Street
Journal, FT Energy, Oil & Gas Journal, Oil & Gas Investor, World Oil,
Bloomberg, PR Newswire, Dow Jones New Retrieval and others.  National
Public
Radio and All Things Considered aired interviews of our key speakers.  As
result of last year's success, we have numerous media sponsors this year,
including Energy Markets, McGraw Hill, Oil & Gas Investor, Houston Business
Journal, PR Newswire, Utility IT, Petroleum Economist, EnergyCentral.com,
Energy Commerce and others.

Benefits:

Enron Net Works will benefit in four ways:

?    First, you will educate customers and partners.  Cisco is bringing
some 70
senior utility executives from Europe to attend; they would be most
interested in your perspectives.  Energy buyers from such organizations as
Ford, United Technologies and e-Mall (an eight-state buying consortium)
have
attended in previous years.

?    Second, you will motivate management from such vendors as Ariba,
Luminant,
IBM, i2 and SAP and many others to develop IT solutions specific to Enron's
vision.

?    Third, you will educate employees.  Some 43 executives from Enron
attended
last year's event.

?    Fourth, you will persuade recruits.  Capable professionals in this
area
are in high demand. Rising stars of the energy industry will learn of
Enron's innovations and rapid growth.

I hope that your calendar is clear.  Look forward to the possibility of
working with you and your staff.  I'll call to follow up.

Yours respectfully,

Bob Nimocks
President
Zeus Development Corporation
2424 Wilcrest Dr., Suite 250
Houston, TX 77042
Main: 713-952-9500
Direct: 832-200-3706
e-mail: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

"susan schnitzer" <s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net> on 03/27/2001 04:44:45 PM
To: "sandra brawner" <sbrawne@ect.enron.com>, "pam anderson" <pama9@flash.net>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fw: TIGHT  SKIRTS  AND  TEXANS

-----Original Message-----
From: mizzjodi@juno.com <mizzjodi@juno.com>
To: julie615@optonline.net <julie615@optonline.net>; hanaone@aol.com
<hanaone@aol.com>; bbron58584@aol.com <bbron58584@aol.com>; lcbron@aol.com
<lcbron@aol.com>; giannini_sa@williscorroon.com
<giannini_sa@williscorroon.com>; danielle.karwoski@dowjones.com
<danielle.karwoski@dowjones.com>; skaszer@hotmail.com <skaszer@hotmail.com>;
preventdk@dellmail.com <preventdk@dellmail.com>;
leanne_michalek@njb.uscourts.gov <leanne_michalek@njb.uscourts.gov>;
bposkitt@sprintmail.com <bposkitt@sprintmail.com>; kjposkitt@aol.com
<kjposkitt@aol.com>; poskitt@worldnet.att.net <poskitt@worldnet.att.net>;
msawatka@hotmail.com <msawatka@hotmail.com>; s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net
<s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: Fw: Fw: TIGHT SKIRTS AND TEXANS

>>
>
>TIGHT SKIRTS AND TEXANS
>> > > > > > > > > >
> In a crowded city at a crowded bus stop, a beautiful
>young woman was waiting for the bus. She was decked out in a tight
>leather mini skirt with matching tight leather boots and jacket.
>
>As the bus rolled up and it became her turn to get on, she became aware
>that her
>skirt was too tight to allow her leg to come up to the height of the
>first step on the
>bus. Slightly embarrassed, and with a quick smile to the bus
> driver, she reached behind her and unzipped her skirt a little, thinking
>that this would give her enough slack to raise her leg.  Again she tried
>to make  the step on to the bus only to discover she still
> couldn't.
>
>So, a little more embarrassed, she once again reached
>behind her and unzipped her skirt a little more and, for a second time
>attempted the step.
>Once again, much to her chagrin, she could not raise her
>leg because of the tight skirt. With a coy little smile to the driver,
>she
> again unzipped the offending skirt to give a little more slack and again
>was unable to make the step.
>
>About this time, the big Texan behind her in line picked
>her up easily from the waist and placed her lightly on the top step of
>the
>> bus.
> She went absolutely ballistic and turned on the would-be
>hero, screeching at him. "How dare you touch my body!!
>I don't even know who you
> are!"
>
> At this, the Texan drawled, "Well Ma'am, normally I
>would  agree with you, but after you unzipped my fly three times, I kinda
>figured that we was  friends."
>> > > > > > >
>
>
>________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>


----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 02/01/2001 01:24 PM -----

	apisciotta@kelleydrye.com
	01/31/2001 02:01 PM
	Please respond to apisciotta

		 To: sue.nord@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Individual.com - News From a Friend!

INDIVIDUAL.COM

Here's an article recommended by: Aileen Pisciotta
and it comes to you via Individual.com, Inc.

The following message was attached:
Sue -- Here is an article reporting the advantages to Earthlink of the
AOL/Time Warner ISP access requirement.

Best regards.  Aileen.

HERE IS THE STORY WE WERE REQUESTED TO SEND YOU

This story appeared on http://www.individual.com January 31, 2001
_________________________________________________________

[B] Earthlink CEO: AOL-Time Warner merger to increase customer access

By Kelley O. Beaucar, BridgeNews

Washington--Jan. 30--Internet service provider Earthlink Inc. may be
playing second fiddle to mammoth AOL-Time Warner in the world of ISPs, but
Chief Executive Officer Garry Betty says its cozy relationship with the
largest
media company in the world is agreeable to them. No doubt, as EarthLink's
newest pact with AOL-Time Warner includes access for the smaller ISP to 20
million households.

*           *           *

"It provides us access to Time Warner cable in 20 million homes ... for us
that's the only significant thing the merger had done for us,"  Betty told
BridgeNews Tuesday, shortly after the Atlanta-based company released its
fourth-quarter earnings, which beat analysts' expectations and provided mostly
positive guidance for 2001.

Betty explained that EarthLink, which is the second largest ISP in the
world with a current total of 4.7 million paid subscribers has been both a
competitor and partner with AOL for several years. AOL-Time Warner now has
nearly 30 million Internet subscribers, for a total of 130 million customers.
Betty said the newly merged corporation's giant footprint gives his own
company
no pause.

"They (AOL) are as much a source of technology and customers as they are
very formidable competitors,"  he said. Earthlink already has a licensing
agreement with AOL for its Instant Messaging protocol, and use AOL-owned
Netscape's server applications. In return, Betty added,  "many of our
customers
come to us directly from AOL."

Betty said he didn't share the concerns held by Internet and media
companies that AOL-Time Warner's merger will create a monopoly.  "I think
competition will take care of itself,"  he noted. The agreements AOL-Time
Warner made with the Federal Trade Commission and Federal Communications
Commission to open up access to smaller companies guarantees competition will
occur, Betty added.

EarthLink is the biggest benefactor of the government's open access deal
with the media giant, as Time Warner's cable lines will be opened up to the

ISP beginning in the second half of 2001, Betty said.

As for the rest of EarthLink's business, the company is looking forward to
expanding its own footprint in the high-speed market in 2001 and it doesn't
foresee problems from the current slowdown in the economy, Betty said. The
Internet companies that did get hit the hardest in 2000 depended heavily on
online advertising for revenues, EarthLink only depends on ads for 2% of its
income, he said.

"It's not going to impact us too much,"  he said, adding the ISP may be
affected slightly from the slowdown in PC sales.

Today, 84% of the company's revenues come from dial-up narrowband
customers. Officials hope to diversify that percentage, focusing on broadband
via digital subscriber line (DSL), wireless, satellite and cable platforms.

Officials said the company's broadband subscriber base has already grown
760% from 1999. The key is keeping costs down and customers happy, an issue
many companies have had problems with of late, especially those with DSL.

"There are challenges that are well-documented,"  Betty said, adding,
"we've done a lot better job than just about anybody in DSL."

Earthlink reported fourth-quarter revenues of $286.8 million Tuesday and
net losses excluding acquisition-related costs of $52.2 million, or 40 cents
per share, beating First Call/Thomson Financial estimates handily by 11 cents.

The company's annual revenue of $987 million is almost a 50% increase over
1999. Company officials said they expect revenues to reach $1.2 billion to
$1.3

billion by the end of 2001 and an annual loss of 85 cents to $1.05 per share.

Shares of EarthLink were recetnly trading at 8 27/32, up 4.04% on the day.
END

_________________________________________________________

Individual.com is the #1 provider of free, individualized news
and information to business people over the Internet.  Visit us at
http://www.individual.com to browse the largest free collection of business,
financial, industry, trade, and company-specific news and information
on the web.

This news story was sent by Aileen Pisciotta through Individual.com.
You will not receive email messages directly from Individual.com
unless you register at http://www.individual.com.

Get more headlines and stories like this delivered FREE to your
desktop every business morning! Register at
http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.

Individual.com also brings you FREE news on your investments!
Sign up at http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.
___________________________________________________________

Entire contents Copyright , 1999-2000, Individual.comv, Inc.,
8 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA


Vince,

I'd like to get someone to sit with one of team for a couple of days.... To
help with reviewing code.

There seems to be two view of how this is currently working.

Your team seems to think Winston group is not being co-operative enough.

Winston's team seems to think they are co-operating...

I'd like to resolve this.

If my suggestion above doesn't work (putting some in your team for a couple
of days) , I would like for us to sit down with Winston, Nilay and Tanya and
try to work out what's happening.

Regards

Steve
------------------------
Tel: 713-345-8980
Cell: 281-541-1862
Page: stevestock@pagenetips.com


Does anyone in Credit know the answer to this question, as I don't?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Tana,

I was just following about these trades.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:36 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	Riskmantra vs. EGM

Tana,

There are about 20-30 deals in pending sent to legal status that are Riskmantra vs. EGM.  My question is should we even be doing trades with Enron Gas Marketing.  And if we should, can we set up an ISDA with RMT with an effective date of 9/5/01?

Thanks,

Patrick


Just met w/ Skilling and Whalley.

Var for gas has temp increase of $15MM until next friday (12/15/2000).
Jeff is calling for an executive comm mtg to ask for an additional $40 MM of
corp var until next wed (12/13/2000).

One issue is UK power will be over VAR everyday starting probably thurs or
fri of this week, unless we increase them as well. (They sweep retail deals
into book once a week on this day). This increase only needs to be $2-3-
million.

Fasten seat belts and apply oxygen masks.

Rick


Jan


Wanda Curry mentioned that SCE was going to have a couple day delay in giving
us more information about our PX credits because they were working on a
request from Loretta Lynch to forward details on PX credits to her.  The
context is probably the SCE/PGE Advice letter filings to change PX credit
formulas.  Could result in our SCE PX credit exposure ($130 Million) soon
becoming public through some CPUC document .


I hear you are good at facilitating a quick "meating"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dunn, John" <John.Dunn@enform.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:45 PM
To:	Wolfe, Jason; Dunn, John; Elliott, Allan; Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Cherry, Beth
Cc:	'JWilkerson@reliant.com '
Subject:	RE: Do we play today?

I'm playing.  I will be in the office at 5:30 for a quick meeting, but I will join you after that.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Wolfe@enron.com
To: John.Dunn@enform.com; Allan.Elliott@enform.com; Michael.Cherry@enform.com; Matt.Sample@enform.com; Beth.Cherry@enform.com
Cc: JWilkerson@reliant.com
Sent: 11/13/2001 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: Do we play today?
Who is playing, and when should we start? Get back at me so I will know
when to show up.
Thanks,
DJ
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Dunn, John" <John.Dunn@enform.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:43 AM
   To:     Elliott, Allan; Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Cherry, Beth;
             Wolfe, Jason
   Cc:     ''''''''Jondaworky (JWilkerson@reliant.com) ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Subject:  RE: Do we play today?
   I'm going to shave my team name in the back of my mullet.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Elliott, Allan
   To: Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Cherry, Beth; Dunn, John;
   '''''''''''''Jason.Wolfe@ENRON.com' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Cc: '''''''Jondaworky (JWilkerson@reliant.com) ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Sent: 11/13/2001 11:35 AM
   Subject: RE: Do we play today?
   Ack!! Trying to catch up here after several days of vacation.  Quite
a
   meandering collection of emails.  You should get your tee shirts and
why
   not go the whole 9 yards and get custom license plates... take pride
in
   your losing streak!!  Unfortunately I don't think I can make the game
   tonight, but Thursday or Friday for an xbox demo would be cool.
   IT Traveler
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


the book is ENA-FT-WT-SOCAL.  Answer to question 2 & 3 - yes
Commodity code NG
Move deals as of 1/1/02
Do not understand question number 6 - other side should remain counter party
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 10:51 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	RE: Additional Book to Move

Darron,

Please confirm the following:
1. I can't find the book ENA-WT-SOCAL in Estate database (please provide the CP ID)
2. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PRICE (CP ID 11360)
3. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PR-OPT (CP ID 92649)
4. Commodity code: NG or NGGJ?
5. Please provide the cutoff date to determine active deals (e.g. instr_end_dt > ? 1-jan-2002?)
6. Use ENA CP ID 1305 as the other side counterparty?

If I can have all the answers soon then I think the deals move can be completed around 3:00p.m.

Thanks,
Cecilia
x53362

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 8:55 AM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Additional Book to Move

Cecilia,
In addition to moving the deals detailed in my previous email, please move only financial deals with the same counterparties from NG-PR-OPT to ENA-WT-SOCAL.  I realize it's a big list, but how long will the entire process take?  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	More Counterparties

Attached is a long list of counterparty names to move from NG-PRICE into ENA-WT-SOCAL.  Please move only financial deals only.  Please let me know when this is complete.  Thanks.

DG

 << File: PositiveMTMCounterparties.xls >>


Two points were apparent after my last conversation with Bill Olson about a
month ago:

1) Texaco has convinced Bill that the plume of elevated TDS originates from
an offsite source; an old waterflood operation toward the northwest and
upgradient of the Texaco and NNG facilities. Although our data from 2-3 years
ago indicated the source as Texaco's old brine ponds, Bill indicated that
Texaco has more recently presented data that is more regional in scope and
implicates the waterflood operation. I have not seen any of this recent data.

2) Bill has accepted Texaco's single soil boring in the former crude oil pit
area as evidence that the pit was not the source of oil found in NNG's
monitor well MW-3. I don't agree, but our best chance of convincing him
otherwise will not come until Texaco excavates the old pit area and completes
the additional assessment activities we agreed to in our meeting with them
last year.

In light of these two points, I think it is going to be difficult to convince
Bill that NNG should not adhere to the biennial sampling until things are
settled between Texaco and NNG. However, if you are going to give it a shot,
I suggest that you present the position that:
1) Texaco has already demonstrated (whether correctly or not) that the
dissolved phase plume of TDS originated from another source;
2) Texaco has already demonstrated that they were the source for the
dissolved phase plume of benzene measured in NNG's fenceline monitor wells;
and,
3) The only unresolved issue is the presence of PSH in monitor well MW-3.
In light of this, the only monitoring NNG should be responsible for is
measuring PSH thickness in well MW-3 since it makes no sense to collect
groundwater samples from a well containing free product.

Also, the last information I have on Texaco's activities is an assessment
report dated July 1997. If you would get a copy of any more recent reports
and correspondence it would be a big help.

Another thought to consider, prior sampling history indicated a declining
trend of benzene concentrations at NNG's fenceline monitor wells. If this
trend has continued, additional sample data would be beneficial to our future
discussions with Texaco and the OCD.

Larry Campbell
10/22/99 09:44 AM
To: George Robinson/OTS/Enron@Enron, Bret Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: NNG Eunice Station

Bret, what do you think about this?  We have pretty much proven that we are
not the culprits is this activity.  I have a problem conducting an ongoing
sampling for an issue that were not responsible for, even though we initiated
the sampling activity.  I plan on visiting the OCD about this issue and
either forcing them to justify why we should continue the sampling when the
data points to our neighbors.  Additionally, because of the turnover and
inability to get the guilty party to get moving on this, spending additional
money and not receiving any return seems like a waste of time.  Thoughts....

George Robinson
10/22/99 08:42 AM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Bret Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: NNG Eunice Station

The last groundwater sampling event at the Eunice Station was completed in
August 1997. Subsequently, the OCD approved our revised sampling plan that
calls for biennial sampling. In light of this we were due to sample this past
August. I held off on sampling in hope that Texaco would soon assume this
responsibility, however, since it does not appear that this is going to occur
anytime soon enough I will schedule a sampling event within the next four
weeks. Since there are only six monitor wells to sample at this site,
sampling can be completed in one day by one person at a cost of about $2500
(including expenses and lab costs).


I thought it might be a some help if I distributed a red-lined version of
this document prior to tomorrow's meeting.  I hope you find this of some use.

Jeff


Hi Mark,

Thanks for your response.  Sorry, I didn't provide you my number here in
Tokyo.  For future reference, my office number is 81-3 5219-4578.  I'll try
to give you a ring Wednesday morning (Houston time) to discuss the going
forward strategy.

 Attached hereto, are the draft documents, modified in accordance with your
comments/questions and my responsive comments (which are set forth below in
red).

Look forward to seeing you soon.

Hi Susan-

Please review the attached documents from the tax perspective.  Thanks.

Best regards,

John

	Mark Taylor@ECT
	08/22/2000 06:59 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Japanese ISDA Documents

Dear John:

So sorry for the delay.  I hope it hasn't caused too much inconvenience. No
problem!  I would have called to apologize in person but believe it or not I
don't have your phone number!   Here are my comments to the draft documents
you sent:

Part 1 (b)  In our other derivatives trading, the cross default test applies
to Enron Corp. with a Threshold of US$100,000,000.  To accomplish this in the
schedule, Threshold Amount for the Enron party would apply to our Credit
Support Provider if there is going to be an Enron Corp. guaranty and the
dollar figure adjusted accordingly.  The Schedule has been revised.  Please
advise if the equivalent change should be made to paragraph (b)(iv)(B) of
paragraph 13 of the CSA.

Part 1 (d)  Has Baker & McKenzie recommended this?  We rely on local counsel
advice for this provision but our preference is that the termination in a
bankruptcy context not be automatic unless it needs to be.  The risk in the
automatic situation is that the market moves significantly before we are even
aware of the situation, i.e. the outstanding transactions terminate
automatically, leaving us with an open, unhedged position which we are not
able to protect since we are not aware of it.  In the U.S. the bankruptcy
code allows us to terminate after the filing of a bankruptcy according to the
terms of the agreement so we know exactly the time to rehedge.   According to
B&M, the ability to set-off against Japanese counterparties is limited by
certain laws relating to insolvency including the Bankruptcy Law.  These laws
give a trustee the right to cherry pick contracts.  Accordingly, it is the
general practice in Japan for parties to elect automatic early termination to
ensure that close out netting takes place before the trustee's right to
cherry pick comes into effect.  In December 1998, a netting law came into
effect in Japan which specifically permits close out netting (notwithstanding
the trustee's right to cherry pick).  The netting law only applies where one
of the parties to the transaction is a financial institution (Mitsui Marine
and Fire, Sanwa and IBJ, would all qualify).  From a legal perspective, it is
now arguable that automatic early termination should not be adopted (for the
same reasons as are described in you message).  However, as a matter of
Japanese market practice, B&M has advised that most schedules with Japanese
counterparties still specify automatic early termination.  Accordingly, the
automatic early termination provision in place.  Please confirm that this is
acceptable.  Please also note, that the automatic early termination provision
will be necessary when Enron Japan deals with Japanese corporations that are
not financial institutions.

Part 1 (e)  We usually choose Loss here as the method which gives the
non-defaulting party the most flexibility.  Market Quotation is often
suggested because of its apparent objective nature.  However, in many of the
markets where we operate, quotations will not be available, where they are
available they may well not be meaningful, and the Loss method gives
flexibility (while still requiring commercial reasonableness).  The Schedule
has been revised.

Part 1 (h)(ix)  This Additional Event of Default only applies when there is
no collateral annex.   When we have the ability to ask for (or be asked for)
collateral in the case of a downgrading, we build that event into the
Paragraph 13 to trigger a reduction of the threshold to zero which requires
the posting of collateral to cover any open position.  If the party fails, it
then becomes a default allowing termination.  The Schedule has been revised.

Part 1 (h)(x)  Wouldn't the cross default be triggered before this could
happen?  B&M has advised that although the cross default provisions may well
be triggered before this clause applies, the clause is standard in Japan and
is not detrimental to Enron, therefore the clause has been left in place.

Part 2  Have our internal Tax people approved this?  I have copied Susan
Musch on this e-mail, so that she may review the documents for tax purposes.

Part 3  I am not familiar with the Representative Director concept or some of
the corporate documents referred to.  Since Enron Corp. will be a Credit
Support Provider, does it have a Representative Director, etc.?  The clause
has been modified to allow different documents to be specified in connection
with the Enron Corp. guarantee.  Please fill in the blanks to specify the
appropriate documents.  Sorry for the oversight.

The legal opinion requirement is one that we can waive if local counsel does
not think it necessary.  In many non-US jurisdictions, local counsel have
advised that an opinion be obtained - in some cases derivatives transactions
are so uncommon that they might be outside the ordinary course of business
and therefore require special board approval; in others, derivatives would
not be permissible activities for a company unless express provision is made
in the corporate documents, etc.  B&M has stated that in practice they have
never been given or asked to review a Japanese law opinion in relation to a
specific ISDA schedule entered into by a Japanese counterparty and would
expect Japanese counterparties to be reluctant to provide such opinions.

Part 5 (b) (g)&(h) These representations originate with CFTC rules in mind
(although they may be helpful for other reasons as well).  If neither party
is in the US, the CFTC reason may go away.  On the other hand, since we are
choosing New York law to apply the argument might be made that US federal law
applies as well.  If that is our theory, there are additional representations
(the Eligible Swap Participant reps) that we should think about putting back
in.   These representations were tailored with the Japanese prohibition on
gambling in mind. I was not able to find the "eligible swap participant"
representation in the Enron US ISDA Form (although there is a reference to
this in the opinion).  Please inform me as to the wording that needs to be
added for New York purposes.

Part 5 (d)  We are currently evaluating whether we should revise this section
to make reference to the ISDA 2000 definitions.  While I think we will get
there, we haven't actually made the decision yet.  So far I guess we leave it
the way it is.  OK

Part 5 (j)  My only concern here is with the value of the Enron Corp.
guaranty as a form for a guaranty from a Japanese entity.  Any differences in
Japan from US practice we should be worried about?  For the swap
counterparties currently being considered by Enron (Mitsui Marine, IBJ and
Sanwa) no guarantees are being required.  B&M has advised, the form of the
Enron Corp. guarantee would generally be acceptable for guaranteeing the
obligations of Japanese counterparties.  However, there are a number of
changes that may be considered including switching the governing law and
jurisdiction provisions to Japan for ease of enforcement against parties
whose principal assets are located in Japan.  It is recommended that the
guarantee be reviewed in further detail before it is actually proposed to
counterparties.

Paragraph 13  I have to admit I'm not as familiar with the Paragraph 13
provisions as the Schedule.  My only concern here is with the MAC clause and
it looks like there's a glitch in the form.  It seems to me that if the
counterparty is only rated by one of the 2 major agencies we shouldn't be
pegged with a MAC if only one of our agencies stops rating us.  The way it is
drafted now if either S&P or Moody's stops rating us, even if the remaining
rating is very high we will have a MAC occur.  The counterparty doesn't have
to worry about Moody's at all.  Just a thought.  The suggested change has
been made.  Additionally, the provision has been modified to provide that a
MAC will occur with respect to Enron, only if both rating agencies downgrade
Enron Corp.  Please confirm this is OK.

On the guaranty, you will need to run the choice of law and jurisdiction
changes past Clement Abrams at Corp. Legal.  My only comment is that we would
usually have a cap that is a bit higher (in this case maybe an extra
$5,000,000) than the threshold in the CSA - that gives the counterparty a
little wiggle room if we fail to post collateral after the threshold is
exceeded.  I will separately forward the guaranty to Clement Abrams for his
approval. The cap has been increased to US$20,000,000.

Tana is preparing a red-line for me that hopefully will show all of the
changes between the US form and the Japan form.  I may have a few more
comments after I see how that comes out but don't expect many.  I apologize
that the red-line was not fully made against the US form.

I hope this is helpful.  Mark-  This has been very helpful! Please feel free
to call and we can walk through these over the phone if that would be
useful.  We should also talk about the most efficient way to prepare these
going forward.  It might make sense for Credit to send their worksheets to
the paralegals here for a first draft which would then go to you for review
before going to the counterparty.  It may slow things down by a day or two
but it would free you up to work on other things.  All excellent ideas.

We're looking forward to having you back.  Looking forward to seeing you
soon.  Thanks again.


Maureen - please forward on to Barry when you get his e-mail address.

Barry - I don't know Humberto personally, but looking over his resume, I
thought he might be a fit in your organization.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
03:00 PM ---------------------------

"Humberto Kuhn" <BetoKuhn@msn.com> on 05/21/2001 11:17:21 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Humberto (Beto) Kuhn, resume

Dear Steve:? With sincere and advance thanks, and pursuant to your recent
conversation with my brother, George, I attach a copy of?the short version?of
my resume.? I have a longer detailed version, as well as numerous references,
that I will be pleased to furnish you.? In addition, I am at your disposal at
any time that?you or any others at ENRON should wish to meet with me.?
Again,?my thanks for your assistance and guidance.
?
Kind regards,
?
?
Beto Kuhn
Cell:? 713/ 906-8463
Res:? 713/ 467-3974
 - RESUME HGK,Short Form 05-01.doc


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


Sally - A new idea popped into my head - I don't know if it makes things
easier - or if everyone would like the idea, but here goes:

What if we gathered, as a whole family, for a couple of days, somewhere easy
- in Texas - like the Hill Country Hyatt, or somehwere in Galveston, or the
YO Ranch or somewhere.   We might spend one night or two - plan something
fun for the kids, get a big suite where the adults could toast mom and dad
with champagne and appetizers - spend time playing games, whatever - just go
somewhere easy - and just spend a day or two.

Then, at that event, we could give Mom and Dad a gift certificate for a more
special (and far-away) trip for them - like a four-day weekend in San
Francisco - or somewhere they'd really like to go.

This would eliminate travel hassles for all of the families involved - but
provide us all an opporunity (albeit condensed) to get together - and Mom
and Dad would still get to go someplace fun.    Maybe we could "chip in"
varying amounts to Mom and Dad's trip so that cindy and richard could afford
it.

Thoughts?   -Cara

Cara White
Community Development Coordinator
USTA Texas Section
1-888-883-6388
cWhite@texas.usta.com


I inadvertently tripped over the NNG website today--it makes no mention of Dynegy's ownership.  The address is www.nng.enron.com <http://www.nng.enron.com> and I got there through a link from www.enron.com <http://www.enron.com>.  Not a huge problem, , but it is confusing.  I didn't look, but Dynegy has its own NNG website, right?   DF


<<Davis response-pr.doc>>

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - Davis response-pr.doc


I would recommend that if we keep Roy Boston we not keep Pat Keene and move Bob Frank to Texas with Roy Boston in the Mid-C.

Jim


Please find attached a memo and powerpoint  presentation that memorializes
the above-refrenced meeting. I would ask that Kevin and Tim forward this on
to everyone in their group who should see it- we did'nt have a good list of
names. Thanks and feel ree to call if you have any questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
12/08/2000 08:32 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: "George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> @ ENRON
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com@ENRON, CCampbell@KSLAW.com@ENRON,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com@ENRON, areynaud@coral-energy.com@ENRON,
dwhaley@coral-energy.com@ENRON, TSeigler@coral-energy.com@ENRON

Subject: Re: DeltaView Document Distribution

Because of schedules, we would like to cancel the 10 AM call, and proceed
with the noon call. I apologize for the inconvenience. Please let me know if
this does not work for you all.

Thanks,

Ben

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/07/2000 05:07:09 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com
cc: areynaud@coral-energy.com, dwhaley@coral-energy.com,
TSeigler@coral-energy.com
Subject: DeltaView Document Distribution

Attached is a revised draft of the Letter Agreement which has been
redlined to show the changes from ENA's last draft.  I am also attaching
an insert which such be substituted for Section 6.2(e) of the LLC
Agreement.

 - Redline.rtf
 - 5wn6w01_.DOC


Please find attached the above article from the e.Business Review, July 2001.

Kind Regards

Sarimah Black


They have not signed an EEI Master Power Purchase Agreement, or any master
agreement with us, and are under credit review. Our starting position with
this counterparty is that we will only accept changes to the EOL GTCs, as set
out in any EEI Master Power Purchase Agreement agreed with EPMI. Please head
off at the pass and save them any further unnecessary outside counsel legal
bills!

Regards

Marcus

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/21/2001 03:22 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Virginia Electric & Power Company

I just received a phone call from Paul Varana, outside counsel to the
referenced counterparty.  His phone number is 713/752-4514.  He said that
VEPCO wasn't happy with the form of GTC attached to the physical online power
confirms and was going to be sending me a letter requesting certain
revisions.  He said the letter would come from Francine Matthews at VEPCO.  I
looked this counterparty up in my database, and it appears that we approved
them to trade physical power with an override letter.  Usually, we don't
allow any changes to the online GTC, but with physical power & the override
letters, I know there is some wiggle room.  I don't know how you want to
handle this, if you want to wait for the letter from VEPCO to come in and
then deal with the issues, or head him off at the pass.  Just let me know.


It is definitely a CES deal that will be over in Sep or Oct of this year.

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
05/25/2000 04:52 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Local Production for June

If the deal is confirmable as a deal that came across on CES's books
[reported as an active deal by CES to ENA], then the deal is a CES deal (CES
- Statoil). BUT, if this is a newly discovered deal - - - - we will need to
confirm with Risk (Mark Breese) to ensure proper booking & that the deal has
been quantified; OR if it is a newly negotiated deal or a deal finalized
after 1/1/00, then it should be entered without the CES prefix (statoil).
Based on the production dates of deal# 280185 and #226563, as combine with
the fact and that I can not find anything in the CES deal listing (CES
'books') specifying a 333/day deal with Statoil I am again hesitant to use
the CES prefix (nor can I confirm that deal #226563 should have been entered
with the CES prefix.

John, can you fill in the missing details?

Cyndie

Chris Germany@ECT
05/25/2000 04:19 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Local Production for June

John, I took the volumes on deal 226556 to 0 for the term of the deal
starting June 1.  This is the purchase from Belden & Blake behind NYSEG.

I changed the volume on deal 226563 from 1 dth/day to 1500 dth/day.  This is
the purchase from StatOil at CPA.  The price on this deal is NX1 + .434 and
the price on John's worksheet is NX1 + .54 (per MCF).  John, is this price
adjusted for dth??

I created deal 280185, purchase from StatOil, volume of 333 day, the price is
NX1+ $.56 PER MCF.  This is a purchase of local production behind the
citygate.  David, this deal probably needs to be hedged in Sitara.
Cindy - deal 226563 is a purchase from CES - Statoil Energy.  I set up deal
280185 with the same counterparty.  This deal should have been in the system
effective 1/1/2000.  According to Elizabeth, we should not use the CES -
StatOil Energy.  It doesn't matter to me how its set up, however, this deal
should have been in the system from Jan and it is the same type of deal as
deal 226563.

I changed the volume on deal 226747 from 1 dth to 1100 dth/day.  This is a
purchase from Questar and it is also local production behind CPA.
John, there are 3 deals for Questar, the other 2 deals have volumes of 0
right now.  Can you tell me how the volume should be split out for pricing
purposes?

Molly, I created deal 280132, FOM priced sale to CES.  This deal will be
matched with the CPA local production deals.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Thanks
cg 3-4743

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 02:41
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/24/2000 05:26 PM
To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com,
jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Local Production for June

Please send this email to anyone that may need to see it.  I'm sure I left
someone out.

This is citygate gas ENA will sell to CES for June.  This will reduce the
numbers on the sheet Doug sent us yesterday.

East Ohio Gas on CNG
10,000 dth/ month from Power Gas Marketing

CPA on TCO
500 dth/day from Power Gas Marketing
1,833 dth/day from StatOil
1,100 dth/day from Questa - Note:  this is an estimated volume.  We should
know the actual volume in the next day or so.

Note:  CES is not taking any Carnagie gas at CPA.

National Fuel
250 dth/day from Belden & Blake.  The deal expires 6/30/2000.

Equitrans
All of the Equitrans is production or pool gas on the pipeline.  ENA
nominates this gas.  CES still has a citygate load of 1,280 dth/day for June
on Equitrans so the production gas will be delivered to CES.

CES will not be receiving any local production behind Peoples or NYSEG.


Do you know what she is talking about.  Do you have to have a seperate book for futures and options for Crude, unleaded and Heating Oil??

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Wong, Jeremy
Cc:	Valdes, John
Subject:	RE: new org regions

Kam,

I will update the regions for the books.  Also please advise which gas book is for future and which one is for the options.  Same for commodity Crude, Unleaded, and Heating Oil (the future & options books for these 3 commodities could be the same and could be different.  But currently you only have 1 book set up for each of these 3 commodities).

Cecilia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:24 AM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia; Wong, Jeremy
Cc:	Valdes, John
Subject:	new org regions

Can you please change the org regions for the attached books.

Thanks

Kam

 << File: Book Request Form  Financial final.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Central final.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form East final.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Texas final.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form West final.xls >>


I have also received regrets from Horton, but confirmation from Metts
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 09/08/99 07:42
AM ---------------------------

Nicki Daw@ECT
09/08/99 05:09 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Sherri
Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Enron Advisory Council Meeting

Unfortunately, Mark Frevert is unable to attend the Enron Advisory Council
Meeting on 16-17 September as he will be attending Analyst meetings with Mark
Koenig in London and Brussels.  Please accept his apologies.

Regards

Nicki


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
CAMPOS, ANTHONY                 CONSTANCE  SUTTON               May 18, 2000
ST. CLAIR, CAROL L              MARK  TAYLOR                    May 17, 2000


if i could get a guaranteed contract plus tips i would skip the trip.  remember how great my legs would look dancing all over the chicks.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry.Ralston@Fluor.com [mailto:Jerry.Ralston@Fluor.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:47 PM
To: vicki glover; Laura Ralston; rkralston@yahoo.com; Gene Agnew;
Rng1993@cs.com; SteerMom1@aol.com; Keith at work; jp3t@pocketmail.com;
Dana Ralston; Jerry & Sue Ralston; Charles Rolston; Homer Rolston; Jane
Rolston
Subject: Open Mouth, Insert Foot

Subject:  Open Mouth, Insert Foot

1. CURL UP AND DIE
I walked into a hair salon with my husband and three kids in town and asked
loudly, "How much do you charge for a shampoo and a blow job?"
- Melinda Lowe, 39, Seguin TX

2. PAD PLEASE
An insurance man visited me at home to talk about our mortgage insurance.
He was throwing a lot of facts and figures at me, and I wanted to follow as
best I could, so I told my 6-year-old son to run and get me a pad. He came
back and handed me a Kotex right in front of our guest.
- Kate Newman, 46,Winston-Salem, NC

3. HO, HO, HO
I was taking a shower when my 2-year-old son came into the bathroom and
wrapped himself in toilet paper. Although he made a mess, he looked
adorable, so I ran for my camera and took a few shots. They came out so
well that I had copies made and included one with each of our Christmas
cards.  Days later, a relative called about the picture, laughing
hysterically,and suggesting I take a closer look. Puzzled, I stared at
the photo and was shocked to discover that in addition to my son, I had
captured my reflection in the mirror wearing nothing but a camera!
- Name Withheld

4. LADY GOLFER
I was at the golf store comparing different kinds of golf balls. I was
unhappy with the women's type I had been using. After browsing for several
minutes, I was approached by one of the good-looking gentlemen who works at
the store. He asked if he could help me.Without thinking, I looked at him
and said, "I think I like playing  with men's balls."
- Colleen Collins, 31, Ferndale, MI

5. NUTS ABOUT YOU
My sister and I were at the mall and passed by a store that sold a variety
of nuts. As we were looking at the display case, the boy behind the counter
asked if we needed any help. I replied, "No, I'm just looking at your
nuts."
My sister started to laugh hysterically, the boy grinned, and I turned
beet-red and walked away. To this day, my sister  has never let me forget.
- Faye Emerick, 34, Ellerslie, MD

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.  Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect
the views of the company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------


I mentioned it to my family last night but nobody took me seriously.  I'm
not sure what kind of position and/or how much they would offer me.  Right
now I'm only making $29K a year and to live in CA I would think I would need
to make at LEAST $35K a year to meet the cost of living, etc.  I would also
ask for a signing bonus to go towards moving costs.  I am very serious about
moving there.  But it all depends on how good his offer is and what kind of
position it is.  I don't know where I would live - Their office is in
Beverly Hills and I know I couldn't afford to live there.  What do you
think?  As far as time frame, I'm thinking February.  That would allow me to
get through the Hollidays and break my lease.  I'm not sure what Dave's
reaction would be.  Things have been going really good lately and he's been
opening himself up a lot more towards me.  For example, he won't tell me he
loves me and that's fine.  But the other night when he thought I was
sleeping, he kissed me on the forehead and whispered it to me.  Yeah.  So
again, I don't know.  I'm sure he'll be dissapointed but I think he will
understand.  He's not the type to say, "No, don't go!  I love you and I want
you to stay!"  Even if it was how he felt.
What about you?  When do you think you'll make your move?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 8:58 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE:

So, you are really serious about this then huh?  I thought you were just
thinking about it.  So where were you thinking of living? Have you
discussed it with your family.  How much would they have to offer you in
order for you to move and what kind of time frame are you thinking about.
What do you think daves reaction will be?


val-

download these songs if you get a chance tonight and i will try to burn them
tomorrow if that is cool.   they are all good

artist
  song
Nelly    Country Grammar
Bone Thugs     ??? just pick a good one
Jay Z     Big Pimpin  & Can i get a what what
Easy E     8 Ball
NWA     Days of Wayback
Brand Nubian    Pass tha gat
Crucial Conflict    Hay
Snop Dog    Lodi Dodi
Limp Bizkit    Nookie
DJ Quik     Black Pussy


Attached is the final standings for the pool.  Please verify your score.  We
had a little drama for second place, Chuck won the tie breaker due to a total
of 158 versus Wolfie's 145(total score was 154).  Special congratulations to
Matt Lenhart for bringing up the rear(nice pick on the last game too).  Hope
to see you guys next year.
PL


Dave:
Can you do the same printout today of children for product #33076
Thanks
John


Maybe he cancelled this week since he is out next week.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           04/05/2001 11:41 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: DELETE MY PREVIOUS MESSAGE _ I HAD THE DATES WRONG


We all attended (parts of) a day long event which I believe Vince is hosting
on Wharton and a project they are doing for us, I personally would like to
see the results of that before doing more with Wharton as overall Vince and
Jeff Shankman have Wharton pretty well covered.

Louise

Christie Patrick
05/21/2001 07:01 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy
Zipper/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J Kaminski/Enron@EnronXGate,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Wharton

Guys--

First of all, Louise, I understand we have a baby??  CONGRATULATIONS!!
(details please, at your earliest chance)

Regarding the Wharton e-Business Initiative (see below for one of the many
eMails I've received concerning Enron's participation--link to the referenced
web site for specific agenda; also, I've received several voice messages from
leaders of the effort).  The information below discusses one of the  forums
(coming up 5/31-6/1) that comprise an on-going e-business initiative in which
Enron has invested with Wharton.

 The participants from Wharton include senior level professors; while there
may be some student involvement, the intentional focus is high level
discussion and research endeavors at the professorial level.
Other participants in WeBI are Corporate representatives.  The idea is for
the professors to offer their latest research issues, promote discussions
among the corporate participants to talk through the professors research and
other research in the literature, as well as for the professors to listen for
new areas for which commercial eBusinesses are seeking new research.

Again,  this is intentionally designed as a High Level Professor
participation on the Wharton side, and high level e-Business Corporate
executives on the other side. This is intentionally designed to create a
high-level 'e-think-tank' environment for senior level professors and
corporate executives.

O.K.....have I labored enough to describe what WeBI is all about??

As opposed to the several other efforts Enron University Affairs has to
DIRECTLY increase Enron's favorability and familiarity on campus at levels
above recruiting, but that ultimately trickle down to recruiting, this is
intentionally a research/discussion effort. Clearly, the Enron Brand equity
in dealing with professors is that the professors ultimately incorporate work
from information from the participatory forums into their class teachings,
references, course work, etc.

A few weeks ago, Louise and I breifly chatted about Enron's involvement in
this effort.  Clearly, there is a HUGE interest by the Wharton professors and
other corporate participants involved to have Enron attend and
participate---they quite respectfully call me and eMail me very
frequently.......All of this is very interesting to me and I have shepherded
our minimal involvement-in-fact........ yet the question remains:  is there
someone at Enron, directly involved in Enron's eBusiness initiatives,
interested in jumping into this effort and participating?  Do those of you
involved in these businesses think it worth your time and expense, or the
time and expense of one of your senior (at least Director level) people to
participate?  Would it be viewed, at least at this time,  simply as an "Enron
brain drain" (I've received this realistic and possibly quite legitimate
concern from more than one business person at Enron).

The bottom line is, I'd like to be able to respond intelligently and honestly
to those at Wharton committed to this effort.  I feel more than comfortable
telling Wharton that, at this time, Enron is satisfied to participate in the
WeBI effort largely at the
financial level it has already invested--with the option to participate at
other levels in the future, at Enron's discretion.

ALL comments solicited----

Many thanks!!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:02 PM ---------------------------

HartleyR <HartleyR@wharton.upenn.edu> on 05/21/2001 03:03:44 PM
To: "'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ICG/Wharton Forum meeting May 31-June 1

Christie,

Lee Goldring, our new Forum director mentioned that he placed a call to you
to introduce himself and follow up on Enron's representation at the next
meeting.  I'm emailing this information to you to alert you to the situation
since I do not think you would want Enron to go unrepresented at the next
meeting. To date, no one from Enron has registered for the Forum sponsored
Online Conversion Workshop,  the Forum meeting on 5/31 or the Members Only
meeting on 6/1.  Please note that the "From Browsers to Buyers: Online
Conversion Workshop" on May 30th is purely optional in case some folks from
Enron are interested in attending.  Since the Forum is co-sponsoring the
Workshop -- WeBI affiliated registrants will not be charged the $495
registration fee as an added benefit for their sponsorship.

Here are all the relevent links to the Forum agenda and registration sites
for your convenience:

Forum Agenda:  http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu/meetingNotes/m_n_5_01.asp
Forum Registration site: http://ecom.wharton.upenn.edu/conferencereg/Reg.asp

From Browsers to Buyers: Online Conversion Workshop:
http://aresty-direct.wharton.upenn.edu/execed/conversion/index.html

Please let me know if there's anything I can help you with.

Best regards,

Robin

Robin Hartley
Associate Director
Wharton Electronic Business Initiative

University of Pennsylvania
Vance Hall - Room 415
3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104
tel (215) 898-4158/fax (215) 898-1905
hartleyr@wharton.upenn.edu
http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu


Kay -

Do we have a confidentiality agreement with General Motors?  Net Works is
looking to do some work with GM.

Please let me know when you have a chance.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


I have already responded previously to Sheila Knudsen, but I will respond
again.

 Name: Marie Newhouse (Maria E. Newhouse)
 E-mail: marie.newhouse@enron.com
 BU: Corporate
 Do I code invoices:  NO
 Do I approve invoices:  YES
 Am I a remote user:   Sometimes

Thanks,
Marie Newhouse
Ext 54185

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of iBuyit@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:42 AM
To: All Enron Employees United States@ENRON
Subject: Reply Requested: Do You Code Or Approve Invoices?

Do you code or approve invoices for goods and services that are processed by
the Houston-based Accounts Payable center?
If yes, please read and respond to this e-mail.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

On May 1st, iBuyit Payables will be activated for all organizations supported
by the Houston-based Accounts Payable processing center (for example,
invoices submitted via AP drop box to 600 Jefferson, Houston).  If you code
or approve these invoices, the iBuyit Payables project team has important
information to share with you about the iBuyit Payables system, training, and
the May 1st transition to the new system.

To identify yourself as a future iBuyit Payables Coder or Approver, please
respond to this e-mail upon receipt with the following information:
*  Full Name (First, Middle, Last)
*  E-mail address
*  Business unit (For example, Corporate, ETS, EWS, EES, or EBS)
*  Do you code invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Do you approve invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Are you a remote user? For example, do you dialup to access the Enron
network? (Yes/No)

This will ensure that you receive important iBuyit Payables information.
Thank you for your response!

Attached is important iBuyit Payables training information:

 << File: iBuyit Payables Training Information.doc >>


We have received the executed Assignment and Amendment of ISDA Master
Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2000, between Delamarva Power & Light Company
("Delmarva"), Connective Energy Supply, Inc. ("Connectiv Energy")  and ENA.
 This agreement   (i) assigns all of Delmarva's right, title and interest in
and to the ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1998,  between ENA
and Delmarva to Connectiv Energy, (ii) amends  the "Threshold Amount" in Part
1(b) of the Schedule to $100,000,000 for ENA, Conectiv Energy, and each of
their Credit Support Providers, (iii) adds in certain other legal form
changes, and (iv) adds a counterparty Guaranty issued by Connectiv (Connectiv
Energy's Credit Support Provider) in favor of ENA in the amount of
$10,000,000.   Copies of the documents will be distributed.


Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


(See attached file: LSN0608.xls)

 - LSN0608.xls


I couldn't agree more...Happy Holidays!

Sue

Paul Harvey writes:
We tried so hard to make things better for our kids
that we made them worse.
For my grandchildren, I'd like better. I'd really like
for them to know about hand me down clothes and
homemade ice cream and leftover meatloaf sandwiches. I
really would. I hope you learn humility by being
humiliated, and that you learn honesty by being
cheated. I hope you learn to make your own bed and mow
the lawn and wash the car. And I really hope nobody
gives you a brand new car when you are sixteen. It
will be good if at least one time you can see puppies
born and your old dog put to sleep. I hope you get a
black eye fighting for something you believe in, I
hope you have to share a bedroom with your younger
brother. And it's all right if you have to draw a line
down the middle of the room, but when he wants to
crawl under the covers with you because he's scared, I
hope you let him. When you want to see a movie and
your little brother wants to tag along, I hope you'll
let him. I hope you have to walk uphill to school with
your friends and that you live in a town where you can
do it safely. On rainy days when you have to catch a
ride, I hope you don't ask your driver to drop you two
blocks away so you won't be seen riding with someone
as uncool as your Mom. If you want a slingshot, I hope
your Dad teaches you how to make one instead of buying
one. I hope you learn to dig in the dirt and read
books. When you learn to use computers, I hope you
also learn to add and subtract in your head. I hope
you get teased by your friends when you have your
first crush on a girl, and when you talk back to your
mother that you learn what ivory soap tastes like.
May you skin your knee climbing a mountain, burn you
hand on a stove and stick your tongue on a frozen
flagpole. I don't care if you try a beer once, but I
hope you don't like it. And if a friend offers you
dope or a joint, I hope you realize he is not your
friend. I sure hope you make time to sit on a porch
with your Grandpa and go fishing with your Uncle. May
you feel sorrow at a funeral and joy during the
holidays. I hope your mother punishes you when you
throw a baseball through you neighbor's window and
that she hugs you and kisses you at Christmas time
when you give her a plaster mold of your hand. These
things I wish for you through tough times and
disappointment, hard work and happiness. To me, its
the only way to appreciate life. Send this to all of
your friends who mean the most to you. We secure our
friends not by accepting favors but by doing them.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/