February 6, 2002    Dear Flycheap.com Member:    You are receiving this email because you are a registered user of Flycheap.com and have indicated that you would like to receive travel specials from us.    Here's what you'll find in today's Flycheap newsletter . . .     - Florida Beach Airfares from $128 Roundtrip    - Florida Beach Vacation Packages from $449    - Top 3 Cruise Deals - from only $249    - Vacation Rentals - 7 Nights from $197 per person    - Reserve your Hotel Room online and Save!  For more information, please visit www.flycheap.com

						  FLORIDA BEACH AIRFARES FROM $128 ROUNDTRIP
						Now is the perfect time to visit the Florida beaches.  Be the envy of all your neighbors.  Get a tropical tan without having to leave the states.  From the panhandle to Key West, from St. Pete Beach to Miami Beach, from Daytona to Naples, the Sunshine State has some of the most beautiful and well-known beaches in the entire world.   These roundtrip airfares to the Florida Beaches found on FlyCheap.com include all taxes and surcharges.
		Fort Lauderdale      New York      Boston      Denver   Fort Myers      New York      Atlanta      Dallas   Miami      Baltimore      Chicago      Philadelphia   Palm Beach      Houston      New York      Charlotte   Tampa      Raleigh Durham      Minneapolis      Pittsburgh  				  $172 $185 $211     $172 $194 $227     $176 $206 $207     $174 $177 $220     $128 $151 $192
						Fares available from where you live to everywhere you want to go.   Visit www.flycheap.com  for even more great fares.  Remember to Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

						  FLORIDA BEACH VACATION PACKAGES FROM $449
						  Call 1-800 FLY CHEAP or visit www.flycheap.com    The Florida beaches are more than just sand and sun. You can enjoy fine dining, visit beautiful museums, or shop like never before. Visit Busch Gardens in Tampa, Metrozoo in Miami, Sawgrass Mills Outlet Mall in Fort Lauderdale, or the spring training home of your favorite baseball team. Family vacation or romantic getaway. East coast or west coast. It's your choice. Book now to take advantage of these great deals and the fantastic Florida weather.  Florida beach vacation packages include 3 nights accommodation at the listed resort, airfare via American Airlines, and a compact rental car from Alamo.
		 Fort Lauderdale Days Inn Bahia Cabana			 Fort Myers Beach Outrigger Beach Resort
	New York Boston Chicago Dallas Denver Los Angeles	$449 $459 $489 $529 $679 $589		New York Boston Chicago Dallas Denver Los Angeles	$459 $459 $489 $529 $679 $589

		 Jensen Beach Holiday Inn Oceanside			 Miami Beach RIU Florida Beach
	New York Boston Chicago Dallas Denver Los Angeles	$449 $449 $489 $519 $669 $579		New York Boston Chicago Dallas Denver Los Angeles	$479 $489 $519 $549 $699 $609

		 St. Pete Beach TradeWinds Sandpiper
	New York Boston Chicago Dallas Denver Los Angeles	$499 $509 $539 $579 $719 $639

						Package rates are available from over 200 cities  to over 120 resorts in Florida.   Call 1-800 FLY CHEAP or visit www.flycheap.com

						  ADDITIONAL GREAT PROMOTIONS NOW AVAILABLE:
						 4th Night Free at all Ohana hotels in Waikiki, Hawaii from 3/1/02 through 6/30/02   4th Night Free at the Kauai Coconut Beach Resort in Kauai, Hawaii through 12/23/02   5th Night Free at select Outrigger and Ohana hotels in Hawaii from 4/1/02 through 6/30/02    5th Night Free at the Royal Lahaina Resort in Maui, Hawaii through 6/19/02   7th Night Free at the Days Suites Maingate East in Orlando, Florida through 12/31/02   7th Night Free at Sheraton's Vistana Resort and Sheraton's Vistana Villages in Orlando, Florida through 12/20/02   Double Upgrades at the Kauai Coconut Beach, Royal Lahaina, and Royal Kona Resorts in Hawaii through 6/19/02       Remember to Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

						  TOP 3 CRUISE DEALS
						1.  Caribbean - 7 Nights Aboard Royal Caribbean - from $549    2.  Alaska - 7 Night Princess Glacier Cruise - from only $599   3.  Bahamas - 3 Nights from Port Canaveral - from $249     For other hot cruise deals, visit  www.mytravel.com

						  VACATION RENTAL SPECIAL
						Cocoa Beach, FL - 7 Night Stay for just $197* Per Person   Featuring luxurious 2-bedroom, 2-bathroom condominiums and large private balconies, The Resort on Cocoa Beach boasts a spectacular 3,000 square foot pool and spa and a fabulous water playground-a perfect playground for the entire family!   $1179 total cost including taxes for a 2-bedroom condo  *Per person pricing based upon 6-person occupancy  Click here for more details

						  RESERVE YOUR HOTEL ROOM ONLINE
						Now that you've booked your flights, search for hotels on Flycheap.com's sister site, MyTravel.com. On the MyTravel.com Hotel Search Engine you can reserve online at one of our 53,000 hotels, resorts and inns. It is safe and secure and you'll find some of the best Hotel Rates in the industry.   Click here to reserve your room online

						This email is free service of Flycheap.com and MyTravel USA.   For more information, please visit:  www.flycheap.com         You received this mailing at this address:  sscott5@enron.com   To automatically unsubscribe from Flycheap.com mailings,  please click here      Flycheap.com is part of the MyTravel Group.  Click here  for details.

						Disclaimer: Roundtrip fares require 14-day advance purchase, Saturday night stay, and Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday travel only.  Quoted fares valid 2/26/02 - 3/21/02 and must be ticketed by 2/11/02.  Domestic fares include all taxes and fees.  Fares non-refundable and may not be available on all flights.  Package rates are per person, double occupancy, based on select midweek travel 3/4/02 - 3/29/02 and include all air taxes and fees, hotel taxes, and car rental taxes and fees if applicable.  Package rates are limited, do not include transfers, and must be booked by 2/11/02. Package rates that include car are based on a compact size car.   Top 3 Cruise Disclaimer: All rates are per person, double occupancy, cruise only, do not include airfare, and include port charges unless otherwise indicated above. Government fees and taxes are additional. All rates are subject to availability and may go up, sell out, or be withdrawn by the cruise line at any time.   Disclaimer for Vacation Rentals: Rates shown are per unit for the specific time period listed and include applicable taxes. Guests may not exceed maximum occupancy for specific unit purchased. Rates may sell out at any time. Additional dates and unit sizes are listed on the website.     FL Seller of Travel Reg. No. ST-33310 CST# 2043440-40 IA SOT 645  Copyright ? 2002, MyTravel USA


Vince/Shirley:

I regret to inform that I am terminating my job with Enron today 12/06/2001. Despite the later events I had a great time working with everyone in this company. More particularly, I will miss a lot of the excitement and learning opportunities that The Research propitiated in this last 3 years.

I will be pursuing new opportunities in a different company and as soon as I settle I will inform my new contact info. I will still be residing here in Houston I and I am looking forward to continuing nurturing the friendship we developed throughout these years.

Many thanks.
Paulo Issler


Mr. Lay,

I wanted to send you a note to say I appreciate the way that you have been handling things.  I have alot of respect for you.  My name is Rebekah Rushing.  I consider myself an Enron grandbaby.  My mother, Helena Payne worked for HNG and then Enron for a total of 24 years.  She was an accounting clerk and retired in April of this year when the accounting group was outsourced.  Going through that process with my mother, was an eye opener for me, however after numerous meetings with her supervisor and the human resources department, I feel comfortable that Enron did a good job of taking care of her in that situation.  Her supervisor even made it possible for her to receive her 25 year grandfather clock.  The one thing that does trouble me is the fact that allot of the people that were around in Enron's beginning that we'll call the worker bee's (the people that you could count to get the job done behind the scenes) have lost alot due to the poor decisions that upper management have made.  My mother along with many others  in her situation were the people that this company could and still can count on, they are loyal to Enron and alot of them had the majority of their 401K invested in Enron stock.  This was the majority of their live savings, they do not have anything to fall back on. In my mother's case (as is the case with many other retired or soon to be retired Enron employees) she lost $300,000 in her 401K and only had a little over $400,000 in it to begin with.  I work with a lady that has been with Enron for 23 years and was looking forward to retiring within the next 5-6 years, but now she's not sure if she'll be able to, because she too lost alot in her 401K.  I realize that it's been said many times, a 401K is not a sure thing but the people that I'm referring to had been around for a long time, knew the track record of Enron, and showed their loyalty to the company.   The second thing that concerns me is that this same group of employees have the possibility of being faced with looking for a job.  Most of them are 50 years or older and have been with this company for many years.  They've survived all the different reorganizations because they've had great work ethic.  They weren't always the most 'innovative', but they've always been the most loyal and dependable.  Instead of their dream of retiring, they're now faced with the possibility of having to find another job.  Interviewing will not be as easy for them, because in some cases, they haven't had to interview for another company in quite some time.  I know the politically correct statement is that they will not be discriminated against because of their age, however statistics show that in some cases when a hiring supervisor has a younger candidate and a more mature candidate (45+), they usually will select the younger candidate.  They wouldn't admit to discrimination of age, but it does happen.

These are the people that my heart goes out to.  I wish that there was some way that these loyal and dedicated employees could be taken care of.  I admire you for your decision to waive your rights to the provision that you would have received.  I realize that everyone has lost something due to the events that have occurred, I just wish there was a way that the generation ahead of me that has been with Enron  could recoop a portion of what they've lost.  It the least that they deserve.

Thank you for your time.

Rebekah Rushing (rebekah.rushing@enron.com)
Enron Principal Investments
713-853-3273 - phone
713-646-8010 - fax


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Continuation     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/cl77.pdf

Natural Gas Continuation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ng77.pdf

Brent Continuation     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/qo77.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'm still learning and it seems
every few minutes we face another computer program meltdown. Following are
the changes for these deals.

459985
PGET

459788
Salt River couldn't take the deal, according to Mike Swerzbin, so we had to
go with Williams.

459789
Changed to PSCO

460001
Prebon is broker

460002
Term is Q1-01

458618
SCEM 25 MW of Mid-C Off Peak for Dec. @ $100
This deal was entered yesterday, according to Mike Swerzbin.

Thanks for your patience,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/15/2000 02:47 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 11-15 discrepancies

Jeff Richter
deal 459985
Check with Richter and see if the counterparty should be Sempra or PGET

Mike Swerzbin
deal 459788
Per Prebon counterparty should be Williams not Salt River.

MIke Swerzbin
deal 459789
Per Amerex cp should be Public Service of Colorado not El Paso

Mike Swerzbin
deal 460001
Amerex does not recognize it.

mike Swerzbon
deal 460002
Per Amerex term should be Q1'01 not Jan'01

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following Amerex deal:
Buy SCEM 25 mw of MID-C off-peak hrs for DEC' at $100.


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/29/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
1/29/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 3,702.
1/29/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 549,362.
1/29/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 250,640.
1/29/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 505,686.


About ten days ago, I sent the attached E-mail containing an Assigned
Cmmr.'s Ruling pertaining to the SCE MOU. The  ACR set forth a "model" for
determining revenue requirements for SCE's retained generation. On Friday,
SCE, as directed, filed comments on the Ruling.  Comments from other parties
are due this Friday, the 11th.

Of primary importance is that SCE used its comments to promote the
methodology for recovery of retained generation costs it had set forth in
Advice 1534-E-A (forwarded  to you last week).  This method provides for an
annual rate true-up mechanism and trigger mechanism.  Such mechanisms allow
for rate increases (or decreases) with the filing of an advice letter.

If we are opposed to such trigger / true-up mechanisms  we need to submit
comments on Friday and/or  a protest of the Advice Filing (also due on the
11th).

Jeanne Bennett

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBennett
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:25 PM
> To: Harry Kingerski (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Robert Neustaedter
> (E-mail); Scott Stoness (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail); Tamara Johnson
> (E-mail)
> Cc: MDay
> Subject: FW: Com Lynch & ALJ DeUlloa's Ruling mailed 4/27/01
> (A.00-11-038 et a l.)
>
> Attached is an Assigned Cmmr.' ruling issued this afternoon pertaining to
> SCE's Memorandum of Understanding with the Governor.
> The ruling is soliciting comments on the appropriate manner of regulating
> utility retained generation. The Ruling sets forth a specific model and
> asks parties to comment thereon.  Comments are due May 11, 2001.
>
>
>
>
>  <<CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc>>

 - CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc


Please prepare contract:

ECT is selling 10K a day at HSC minus $.075 at Katy Tailgate all month (AUG
99) and ECT has the option to sell an additional 10K a day (option is daliy )
at Katy tailgate at HSC minus $.0125.
Thanks!

JW


Shirley,

Please, put Oleg Bodnar on Jeff Shankman's and John Arnold's schedules
for an interview. He should be already on John Lavorato's schedule.

Vince


Thanks for the note.  I certainly know by responses that I am getting tonight
who is in the office late!  I was told that the memo would come out today -
you just had to be here at dinner time to see it!  I am really pleased about
how we have been able to improve the perception of what our group does and
its importance to the organization.  And yes, we need more female names on
these lists!  --Sally

Tana Cashion @ ENRON   01/12/2001 07:43 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations!

Congratulations on your promotion!  What a great statement to how far you
have brought Energy Operations.   I'm sure your team will be excited to see
your efforts recognized.  Also, it is very encouraging to see a female name
on the list.  Best of luck!

Tana Cashion


Sounds good to me.

From:  David Port @ ENRON
        01/08/2001 10:17 AM

To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Risk Forum Luncheon, January 9, 2001

yes

From:  Cassandra Schultz
       01/08/2001 10:08 AM

To: David Port, Sally Beck
cc:

Subject: Risk Forum Luncheon, January 9, 2001

want to reduce the time to 1 hr on weeks we don't have specific
agenda/speakers?
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 01/08/2001
10:07 AM ---------------------------

From:  Araceli Romero
    01/08/2001 10:01 AM

To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawn
Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT,
Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Barry Pearce/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Araceli
Romero/NA/Enron@Enron, Mercy Gil/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy
Lewelling/NA/Enron@Enron, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Giselle
James/Corp/Enron, Inga Latson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Risk Forum Luncheon, January 9, 2001

This is a reminder that the next Weekly Risk Forum Luncheon will take place
Tuesday, January 9th,  from 11:30a.m. to 1:00pm in conference room EB-2868.
Lunch will be served; consequently, if you are unable to attend please advise
accordingly.

Thanks,
AC Romero
3-0402


How about 11:00 on Tuesday ?  I have placed this on my  counsel's calendar.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Sheila,

I would like to hire Anita DuPont as a senior admin assistant, reporting
to Shirley.

Please, call me about it after you review the resume.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
08/02/2000 08:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Anita DuPont Resume

Vince:

Here is the resume you requested.  Thanks.   Anita


Shubh,

How are you doing through all of the uncertainty associated with DPC these days? Are we still waiting for the lenders to decide whether or not they will continue funding the project? What is the MSEB's current position?

I'll give you a call Wednesday morning (Mumbai time).

Best Regards,

Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Bates/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
04:22 PM ---------------------------
From: Amanda Huble/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/20/2001 10:03 AM
To: Airam Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Quezada/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jessica Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Vuittonet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Please forward this to your groups.

PIRA is coming in May to do their semi-annual energy outlook.

Greg Shuttlesworth- North American Natural Gas --- May 14th 3-5 pm (30 C1)
? New Production Outlook
? Price Direction
? Demand Fundamentals

Dr. Gary Ross - World Oil Outlook --- May 16th 7-8:30 am --32C2
? OIl/ Demand/ supply Outlook
? Regional balances
? OPEC Rhetoric

Jen Fraser
34759


To members of the RTO West Stage 2 RRG and interested parties:

The upcoming conference between representatives of FERC and various western
states was discussed briefly at the March 23 RRG meeting.

Attached for your information is the notice FERC issued on Friday, March 23
with respect to that conference.  The conference will still be in Boise,
Idaho but it has been moved to April 10.

- Sarah

 - el01-47.00b.doc


Pierre-Philippe,

Thanks for your message. I shall be traveling for the next 3 days. In case
you want to reach me, you can always use my AOL E-mail address. I shall send
you the outline of my presentation in a week. I shall make my trip
arrangements later this week and I can book the hotel myself. What hotel
would you recommend?

Vince


Please find attached the following article/s:
'The e-commerce offensive of the giants ,,Big, ,,Beautiful, ,,B2B''' - Handelsblatt

Kind Regards,
Kuldeep Chana


You now have edit access to the financial trading agreements database.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 04:53 PM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	05/10/2001 04:46 PM

		 To: "tana.jones@enron.com" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request for randy.otto@enron.com

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034072&Page=
MyReq.


Bill:

Please deploy the following local.env file into TDS stage. It will connect to sitstge instead of sitpara, so we can complete the dealcapture to CPR to positions loop.
(We cannot use sitpara because we cannot create deals into the production instance sitpara points to.)

Thanks


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042618.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Dear Mr. Lay,

i have just returned home after picking up Victor at Shepherd/Kirby and
bringing him to the grocery store.  He shared with me that you had stopped
to say hi and gave him $20 from your wallet.  This email is to convey my
warmest personal thanks to you for your generosity to those less fortunate.
i have paid for an apartment on Commonwealth for 3 years for him, and check
on him every day...he has also volunteered his time and efforts to several
of my former work projects - JDF, MS150, etc.

i will be going into redeployment next monday, and hopefully will be
fortunate enough to stay on at ENRON.  If it doesn't work out, please know
that I am grateful for the 4 years I spent there - the company has treated
me very well, and i will always remain loyal and dedicated to you.

I applaud your integrity and ethics - should you ever need any volunteer
assistance, please call me at 713  863 - 7615.

Sincerely,

Deb Gebhardt

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Hi Richard.  I was just wondering if you sent this to me because of my recent
inquiry to Joe re: personnel profiles for power marketing/trading folks for
our Australia efforts?  thanks

Richard Ingersoll@ECT
02/19/2000 08:52 PM
To: Rebecca A. McDonald@ENRON
cc: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON

Subject: Re: Paul Quilkey

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca A. McDonald @ ENRON                           02/18/2000 05:51
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Paul Quilkey

Please join me in congratulating Paul Quilkey in his new role as Vice
President leading our efforts in Australia.  Joe Hirl has assumed a leading
role in the formation of our business in Japan.  Joe also has regional
responsibility for trading activity.

Paul's appointment is in recognition of the critical role Paul has played in
Enron Australia's successful commencement and the body of outstanding work he
has accumulated to date in his career with Enron. It is worth noting that
Paul joined Enron as recently as the Associate intake of 1995.  In the short
time since then Paul has developed and grown through various positions to his
current Trading and Origination role, a position of great responsibility in a
dynamic young business making aggressive inroads into the Australian market,
and far from Enron's traditional US markets.

Please join me in congratulating Paul on his appointment.

Rebecca


The Houston desk has asked me to prepare a form of confirm for a credit
derivative based on the bankruptcy of a Canadian reference entity.  Before I
talk to Canadian counsel about the bankruptcy laws there I thought I should
check with you guys and make sure you haven't done this already - any issues
you know of?
Thanks, Mark


He did!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Let's discuss - there were quite a few changes to be done first.

The first place to demo will be the Thursday lunch meeting to the Net Works
team when ready.

Thomas D Gros@ENRON
12/12/2000 01:13 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CommodityLogic All-Module Demo

If you would like, the team will be prepared to show live demonstrations of
the latest versions of all four CommodityLogic modules next Thursday,
December 21st.  This would probably require about 2 hours.  The versions
displayed will be:

Financial Management Module 2.0
Financial Invoice Exchange 1.1
Confirm Central 1.0
Contract Exchange 1.0

Please let us know if you are interested in attending.

All the best,

Tom


Start Date: 2/1/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020121.txt


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 07:11 PM -----

	"Carl Guardino" <cguardino@svmg.org>
	04/10/2001 06:10 AM
	Please respond to cguardino

		 To: <cguardino@svmg.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Energy Rates - Increases

Dear Energy Committee Member -

I just spoke with two of Governor Davis' top energy advisors.  As you know,
the Governor mentioned the need for a rate increase in his televised address
last Thursday night.  While his speech, and corresponding notes, went into
some detail on how that increase would impact residential customers, it did
not go into great detail on the increase to commercial customers.

As you know, the PUC's proposed increase was not at all proportional
relative to use by residential and commercial customers, and the
corresponding rate increase for each.  SVMG has long argued that some level
of increase would probably be necessary, but that any rate increase should
be proportional to use.  For instance, since residents use approximately
one-third of the power, then residential customers should absorb one-third
of the increase (taking into account, of course, the most vulnerable
residents), and commercial customers should absorb the two-thirds in a way
that is proportional to use.

I am encouraged by my phone call with the Governor's advisors, in that they
seemed to agree strongly that the PUC proposal was not at all proportional,
and seemed to concur that such a disproportional structure would be damaging
to California employers.  They are going to send me more details tomorrow
(Tuesday) about the Governor's plan, and I will then pass that information
along.

In the meantime, I hope this limited information helps, and will keep you
posted as I learn more.

Sincerely,

Carl Guardino

 - winmail.dat


Attached please find the final executive communications document
with completed phone numbers for the millennium rollover weekend.

The Y2K Corporate team and all Enron business units will be monitoring
the Y2K event the day prior to and following the rollover.

Each Enron major site has developed contingency plans, and every
Enron location will be contacted for status checks as the century rollover
occurs.

We look forward to reporting our Y2K success.


Kay,

 I will be down that weekend, but I am not sure about the rest of the family.
All is well here.  I will try to bring some pictures if I can't bring the
real thing.

Keith


Mr. Titman:
I have not heard back from Professor Ronn, so I am not sure as of now whether
or not I can meet with him.  I will give him another call today to see if he
is available.  Thanks
Ben


Happy New Year.  We hope your holidays were enjoyable and restful.  For a pleasant start to 2002, please join your Enron colleagues for coffee and donuts this Friday, January 11, from 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. in the lobby of the Enron Building.  We look forward to seeing you there.


I actually received the last document I need to put otgether binders this
week.  Linda and I will compile closing binders with all the relevant
documents next week and send you one set for your files.  I will send copies
of the RBC documents to Rick at the same time.

So, when are you going to come and enjoy our crisp weather?  Mark Taylor
e-mailed me saying he thought it was a good idea for you to come up here to
train Linda and Sharon.  It ain't Stampede, but at least Peter and I can
return the hospitality.

From: Tana Jones on 11/10/2000 11:15 AM CST
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canadian Prepay

Rick Borden at Macleod Dixon sent us a fax requesing copies of the documents
on the prepay.  Can you send him a copy?  Also, when they're all together,
can you send a copy to me for our files.  Thanks!


A helpful FERC order as we work on asset management deals:

New Horizon Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Duke Power Company, EL00-101-001.
Order on Rehearing. Order issued October 11, 2000 addressing a complaint by
New Horizon Electric Cooperative, Inc (New Horizon) against Duke Power Co.
(Duke) seeking FERC resolution of four disputed issues, including treatment
of energy imbalances not prevented by dynamic scheduling. New Horizon's
complaint claimed that energy imbalance service does not apply to it, since
it will employ dynamic scheduling to effectively remove its load from Duke's
control area. Further, New Horizon maintained that any deviation between the
dynamic schedule and the actual metered delivery of energy constituted
inadvertent interchange energy (which is the net difference between actual
and scheduled interchange energy between two control areas) and proposed that
any differences would be returned in-kind within two hours. On November 9,
New Horizon filed a request for rehearing or clarification of the October 11
Order. Order issued February 26 granting New Horizon's request for rehearing
or clarification of the October 11 Order. Order clarifies that, to the extent
dynamic scheduling by New Horizon operates successfully; New Horizon should
not be subject to charges under Duke's Schedule 4 Energy Imbalance Service.
In such circumstances, any imbalances between energy deliveries on behalf of
New Horizon and New Horizon's load should be accounted for by Duke as
inadvertent interchanges only. In addition, Order directed parties to
negotiate in good faith to establish a standard for the successful operation
of dynamic scheduling.


- KFC.jpg


Hi Grant,
As requested I have sent a quick summary document giving an up-to-date
description of the VaR model.
I may well have missed some points but Cantekin has worked closely with me on
any changes so it is worth
consulting him on any details I have missed.

Thanks
Kirstee


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000
03:00 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Garrett Tripp                           03/09/2000 02:51 PM

To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RPU

The following pricing has been completed for RPU LM6000 deal.

The price for the 6/1/01-9/30/06 term.
$4.01kw-mo Spread Option Value Plus $1.67kw-mo Capacity for  a Total Price of
$5.68

Assumptions:
47 MW year one, 25 MW year two through six at MAPP (curve) ISO
Heat rate 10,200
Max run hours 1400
Summer only deal
VOM $3.02
NG at NNG Ventura with 0.10 summer adder
7x16 product
97% Availability Factor

Yrly Price without capacity


I have responded below.  Also, my title is Managing Director and General
Counsel of Enron Wholesale Markets.  I would add a bullet " comparison of
masters in use in North America."   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 01:15 PM -----

	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
	09/19/2000 12:34 PM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc: Mary Cunningham <MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org>, Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org>
		 Subject: North American Energy and Power Committee Meeting: invitation dr
aft and questions

   Mark

 Bob, Mary and I have been discussing a variety of issues and need
your input before sending out the invitation, which we should do soon.
Please advise on the following:

   1.  We continue to feel the name of the committee
(including Power) is not sufficiently expansive to accommodate the growing
markets involving energy and other new derivatives. We were considering
something like Energy and Developing Derivative Markets?  We thought the old
name Commodities had a traditional rather than a forward-looking sound to
it. What are your thoughts?  I like Energy/Emerging Markets Committee or
Energy and Emerging Markets Committee.

   2.  As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, invites
should go to US companies and non-US companies with a US presence in the
energy/commodity markets. Non-members should be invited as in London. We
told people at the London meeting about the Houston meeting so they are on
notice. Also, if there are minutes of that meeting produced soon they will
probably refer to the meeting so there may be no need to invite them.
Individual call-ins should be discouraged, but we might consider giving
people an opportunity to gather at ISDA NY and plug a small group in from
there. It's unlikely we will get many people from NY to go to Houston just
for this meeting.  I am ok with plugging people in from NYC so long as we
know exactly who we are plugging in.

   3.  When you suggested Enron as the venue, were you
offering a conference room or should we be considering the Doubletree or
somewhere else?  .  Did we ever settle hours, etc. and whether there should
be some kind of "social event" afterwards and for whom?  All of this is
obviously intended to increase the profile/activity of the committee;
highlight the upcoming conference; focus on the issues that are not as
significant to the European committee. Should we agree to a general social
event, we'll include in the attached draft invitation.  I am ok having a
social event, but wonder if we shouldn't see how this meeting goes and plan
next time accordingly.  Please schedule a room at the Doubletree.  I would
suggest 3:30 and plan on a two hours meeting.

   4. Attached is a draft invitation. Please
comment on the text, etc.   Would you prefer to be the signatory? No
    <<Energy Agenda Draft.doc>>

   I look forward to your thoughts.
   Many thanks, Ruth

 - Energy Agenda Draft.doc


Join the 2001 Enron Running Club!

? More than 35 sponsored charitable runs;
? More than 40 intra-club runs hosted throughout the year;
? Race registration and packet pick up on sponsored runs;
? A marathon program including the Big 3 Warm-up Series (20K, 25K, and 30K)
and the Houston Marathon;
? A track and field program that offers training and opportunities to compete
at local and national levels;
? Participation in team relays from track and field to marathons;
? Eligibility for HCAA and USCAA  membership;
? Complimentary runner,s singlet for new members;
? ERC running gear at approximate cost to the ERC;
? Discounts at RunSport, Fleet Feet, and Run Wild Sports;
? Monthly luncheons featuring guest speakers;
? Members are kept up to date on running events;
? Team camaraderie and teambuilding.

DETAILS

Information about 2001 benefits, policies and sponsored events, are included
in the following:

	RENEWING MEMBERS

	Existing members wishing to renew their membership,
	please see the following:

		NEW MEMBERS

		New members wishing to join, please read and complete the following:

If you have any questions, please call me at (713) 853-4770 or e-mail me at
cindy.richardson@enron.com.

Thank you,

Cindy Richardson


Yes.  Thanks.
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron


I will be out of the office starting this afternoon 11/8 and will be back on
Monday. Aimee 3-0506 will be the point person for any questions but the
following people will do some of my desk, thanks.

Mark - HPL Pools
Bob C - Daily noms, path ENE and Bridge Back
Tom - Tufco
Sabrae - BP transport, NNGB, Carthage

If you have any questions please let Aimee know, thanks

Carlos


Shirley,

What day is she coming?

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
12/04/2000 01:36 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin
Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interview Schedule for Iris Mack

Below is the interview schedule for Iris Mack.  I will give your her
resume on Thursday.

8:30 AM   Vince Kaminski
9:00 AM   Stinson Gibner
9:30 AM   Tanya Tamarchenko
10:00 AM  Zimin Lu
10:30 AM  Vasant Shanbhogue
11:00 AM  Molly Magee

Thanks!

Shirley


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040703.txt


Please see the attached file for your respective area (by your last name) and make sure you're comfortable with your latest forecast numbers (excluding salaries).  I have added a Capex section for any groups that will plan on spending capital dollars.  Please be as detailed as possible.

Assume forecast dollars are only reflective of the estate.  For those ENW groups likely to have resources moving to NETCo, please include those forecast dollars in the "NETCo" tab.  E.g., If we need a total picture of Jenny's spend, we'll add the "Rub" tab (estate) with the "NETCo" tab Jenny submits.

Jenny/Beth P.,
A license / maintenance renewal schedule was obtained from GSS.  We put together a summary tab called "Lic-Main Breakout".  These dollars are reflected in your respective forecasts.  Please review for completeness and ensure we are not double counting any dollars already included by your folks.

Please confirm your respective numbers and reflect any changes you know of by end of day today.

Thanks,
Mike


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009596&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009596
Request Create Date : 12/7/00 4:03:17 PM
Requested For       : kelly.lombardi2@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Complete trips

 Note: These results cover a metro area with several airports. Review your
choices carefully.

   $237.50

Fri
5-Jan-01
4hr 9mn  New York (LGA)
Depart 12:30 PM   to   Houston (Hobby)
Arrive 3:39 PM
Flight: 1669

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Sun
7-Jan-01
3hr 17mn  Houston (Hobby)
Depart 6:55 PM   to   New York (LGA)
Arrive 11:12 PM
Flight: 1454

Details and purchase options.

   $237.50

Fri
5-Jan-01
4hr 22mn  New York (LGA)
Depart 5:30 PM   to   Houston (Hobby)
Arrive 8:52 PM
Flight: 1685

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Sun
7-Jan-01
3hr 17mn  Houston (Hobby)
Depart 6:55 PM   to   New York (LGA)
Arrive 11:12 PM
Flight: 1454

Details and purchase options.


1/1/02
1/2/02
1/7/02
1/9/02
1/11/02
1/13/02
1/15/02
1/16/02
1/21/02


thanks for the help

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hillier, Bob
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Webb, Jay
Subject:	Product Suspension on Friday

Greg, the Call Center called me on Friday saying that your products had dropped off the WEB during the maintenance window on EOL.  The reason for this is that each month your product has a different Product ID, and your September product did not have the flag set to not suspend. I have set the flag in the database for product "53549, US WTI Swap Nymex LD Sept 01" so that it will not suspend in the future.  Also we have added a procedure in the Control Center to make sure we check for this near the end of every month so we set the flag appropriately for each new month's product.

bbh

 << File: Hillier, Bob.vcf >>


Vincent Edling will be there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erb, Kim [mailto:KErb@houston.deepwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM
To: Ana Maria; Andy Edling; Anita Kudla (E-mail); Cindy Dick (E-mail);
Gina Hemphill (E-mail); Isabel Torras; Matt Bajmanlou (E-mail); Robert
Wall; Shelley Corman (E-mail); Steve Hanner; Terrell Hemphill (E-mail)
Subject: Practice - Friday & Saturday

Hello Pelicans,

Just a quick reminder of our scheduled practice Friday at 5:15 and Saturday
at 12:00 noon.  As this is our first emailing, please confirm receipt of
this message.

See everybody Friday.

Kim R. Erb   **
Supervisor, Marketing Services
(713) 232-7612
kerb@houston.deepwater.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jeff Poche/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jeff Poche/HOU/AZURIX@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 2:04 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Anderson, Michael
Subject:	Information Request

Tracy,

Here is the Azurix information you requested.  I have not sent it to Corp so you need to include it in your information.

Let me know if you have questions.

Jeff


Thank you.

From:	Theresa Hess/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 09:04 AM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:	Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	FW: GISB Member Ratification Ballot

I'll take care of this.

Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	GISB1@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-GISB1+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:50 PM
To:	Gisb@aol.com; GISB4@aol.com
Subject:	GISB Member Ratification Ballot

Dear GISB Members,

In .pdf format bookmarked, please find the attached ballot to record your
vote on the ratification of a recommendation modifying two GISB standards.
The recommendation was adopted by the Executive Committee (EC) on May 29,
2001.  To record your vote, please fill out page two of this communication
and either email (gisb@aol.com) or fax it (713-356-0067) to our office by
June 15.  The shortened period for ratification was approved by the EC on May
29.  Should the recommendation be ratified, it will be included in the
publication of version 1.5 of the standards.

The EC voting record and discussion of this item is contained within the EC
minutes of May 29, 2001.  The EC minutes can be found on the GISB home page
(www.gisb.org), as can the request, recommendation, and related subcommittee
and task force minutes.  Transcripts of the EC meeting where this
recommendation was discussed can be ordered by calling the GISB office --
713-356-0060.

Also attached are the recommendation and the Executive Committee draft
minutes of May 29, 2001.  Please feel free to call the GISB office if you
have any difficulty retrieving any of this information.

Best Regards,  GISB Office

The GISB organization follows a privacy policy, which does not permit
distribution of contact information. As such, all email addresses are denoted
blind in correspondence.  Upon receipt of notice, the GISB office will modify
the distribution to no longer carry your address.  If you would like to add
other participants from your organization to this distribution list, please
also email such request to the GISB office.

 - bt010529 ballot recs minutes.PDF


Good news!

Hub	76,295

Transport	100,182


======================================================

TR's State NewsWire

. . .daily intelligence on communications
industry news and policy from the editors
of Telecommunications Reports. . .

======================================================

*Table of Contents*
June 6, 2001

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- PUC conditionally supports Verizon interLATA bid
CONNECTICUT -- SNET challenges city's telecom certification
TENNESSEE -- BellSouth to ask TRA to support market-entry bid
soon
MICHIGAN -- PSC adopts '616' area code 'split'
NEW YORK -- Nassau County restricts use of wireless phones
WEST VIRGINIA -- Verizon to appeal $18M access-rate reduction
CALIFORNIA -- Wood proposes 'anticramming' rules
MISSOURI -- House passes rights-of-way bill
GEORGIA -- WorldCom says FX calls subject to 'recip comp'
CALIFORNIA -- ALJ suggests requiring Pacific Bell to permit
intraLATA toll presubscription
CALIFORNIA -- PUC extends deadline for Pacific Bell interLATA
filing
IOWA -- Board mulls revoking LTDS's certificate
NEBRASKA -- PSC to discuss implementing '511'
NEBRASKA -- PSC seeks copies of MDU contracts
CONNECTICUT -- DPUC expands Lifeline assistance in tribal areas
MICHIGAN -- Customers can bring complaints without counsel
OREGON -- Group criticizes AT&T price hike
MINNESOTA -- MP Telecom upgrades network
MASSACHUSETTS -- CTC activates Springfield fiber network
GEORGIA -- AGL networks to install fiber in Atlanta

______________________________________________________

PENNSYLVANIA -- PUC conditionally supports Verizon interLATA bid

The Public Utility Commission today lent its support to Verizon
Pennsylvania, Inc.'s application to provide in-region interLATA
(local access and transport area) services, subject to several
conditions to ensure market competition.  Today's decision
concludes a formal investigation that began when Verizon
requested the commission's support in January.  (1/9/01)

In a 3-2 vote, the PUC told Verizon that it must agree to a
permanent assurance plan with "self-executing" remedies based on
the New York model already accepted by the FCC and to increased
penalties for failure to meet performance standards.  Verizon
said that it will accept these conditions and that it plans to
file its interLATA bid with the FCC "shortly."

Commissioners Nora Mead Brownell and Terrance J. Fitzpatrick
dissented.  Commissioner Brownell said, "I cannot, in good
conscience, affirm that these markets are open as envisioned
under the [federal Telecommunications Act of 1996]."  Both
dissenting commissioners listed several areas in which Verizon
had failed to meet the FCC requirements to determine that local
markets are open to competition.

A WorldCom, Inc., spokesman told TR, "We agree with the
dissenters and hope the FCC will recognize that problems still
exist and force Verizon to fix them prior to allowing them to
offer long distance."

Once Verizon files its market-entry bid with the FCC, the PUC
will present its recommendation.  Section 271 of the Act requires
the FCC to consult with the U.S. Department of Justice and
relevant state regulators before ruling on such applications.
(Docket no. M-00001435, Consultative Report on Application of
Verizon Pennsylvania Inc., for FCC Authorization to Provide In-
Region, InterLATA Service in Pennsylvania)

______________________________________________________

CONNECTICUT -- SNET challenges city's telecom certification

Southern New England Telecommunications (SNET) has filed an
appeal in Superior Court (New Britain) challenging the Department
of Public Utility Control's decision to grant the city of Groton
a certificate to provide telecom access services.  (Docket no.
00-03-12)

SNET argues that Groton "is not legally empowered to offer
telecommunications services to those who are not inhabitants of
its electric service area" under Connecticut General Statutes 5
7-233i.  Groton's customers as defined in its application would
all be noninhabitants, SNET said.

In its April 11 decision, the DPUC agreed with Groton's argument
that "[the statute] has no language prohibiting a municipality
from offering wholesale telecommunications service."

______________________________________________________

TENNESSEE -- BellSouth to ask TRA to support market-entry bid
soon

BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., has notified the Regulatory
Authority that it plans to request support for its bid to enter
the Tennessee interLATA (local access and transport area) market
"by the end of July."  Compliance with the 14-point "competitive
checklist" of section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act
is a prerequisite for FCC authorization to provide in-region
interLATA service.  The FCC must consult with the U.S. Department
of Justice and relevant state regulators before ruling on the
applications.

BellSouth asked the TRA to schedule hearings on its application
for the first week of November.  BellSouth asked the TRA to
support its section 271 bid in 1997, but the company withdrew the
request before the TRA could decide whether to endorse it, a TRA
staff member told TR.

______________________________________________________

MICHIGAN -- PSC adopts '616' area code 'split'

The Public Service Commission yesterday approved a geographic
"split" to relieve number exhaustion in the "616" area code.

A north/south geographic split will be implemented with a
dividing line that follows the northern boundaries of Saugatuck,
Hamilton, Hopkins, Wayland, Middleville, Hastings, and Woodland
rate centers.  Customers in and to the south of these rate
centers will receive a new area code.  Customers to the north of
the rate centers will retain 616.

Permissive dialing will begin by July 13, 2002, and mandatory
dialing will begin Feb. 15, 2003.  Wireless carriers will have an
extended permissive dialing period through Feb. 15, 2004.  (Case
no. U-12850)

______________________________________________________

NEW YORK -- Nassau County restricts use of wireless phones

Nassau County today enacted an ordinance requiring the use of
hands-free devices when operating wireless phones while driving.
"Although mobile phones provide convenience for our busy lives,
their use must conform with the need for public safety," Nassau
County Executive Thomas Gulotta said.

Emergency calls to police, fire, ambulance, or health care
providers are exempt from the requirement.  The ordinance
authorizes the police department to fine up to $100 per
violation, a Nassau County spokesperson told TR.  The ordinance
takes effect July 1.

______________________________________________________

WEST VIRGINIA -- Verizon to appeal $18M access-rate reduction

Verizon West Virginia, Inc., yesterday said it plans to ask the
Public Service Commission to reconsider an order requiring
Verizon to reduce its access rates by $18 million over three
years.  The PSC's order addressed an AT&T Corp. complaint.  While
the reduction is smaller than the $27.6 million suggested by
AT&T, it's larger than the $6 million cut Verizon proposed.

Verizon said that, if given the chance, it would demonstrate that
the PSC was "misguided in seeking to mirror in-state and
interstate access rates."  The telco said the order gives AT&T
and other long distance companies a free ride on its network at
the expense of consumers.

The PSC ordered the access charge reductions to be passed through
to West Virginia toll customers.  Verizon responded, "People
shouldn't hold their breath waiting for AT&T to pass along any
savings."  (Case no. 00-0318-T-C, AT&T Communications of West
Virginia, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc.)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- Wood proposes 'anticramming' rules

Public Utilities Commissioner Charles Wood has proposed rules to
regulate the inclusion of noncommunications charges on phone
bills.  Existing law, which authorizes only communications-
related charges on phone bills, is scheduled to expire July 1.
(1/5/01)  The proposed rules are designed to prevent "cramming,"
which is the placement of unauthorized charges on phone bills.

The proposed rules require telecom companies to obtain a
customer's written consent before including noncommunications
charges on phone bills.  Customers may revoke their consent at
any time without charge and may identify a dollar maximum per
charge and per billing cycle on noncommunications charges.
Telecom companies may not disconnect or threaten to disconnect
basic local phone service for nonpayment of noncommunications
charges.

Under the proposed rules, telecom companies must take
"reasonable" precautions to screen vendors and billing agents
before agreeing to provide noncommunications billing services for
them.  Noncommunications charges must be identified in a separate
section of phone bills.  Comments are due June 20.  (Rulemaking
00-02-004)

______________________________________________________

MISSOURI -- House passes rights-of-way bill

The House has passed a bill restricting local governments'
authority to regulate public rights-of-way.  The measure now goes
to Gov. Bob Holden (D.).  Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. and
competitive local exchange carriers support the bill, but the
Missouri Municipal League "fought the bill tooth and nail," a
league spokesperson told TR.

SB 369 would prohibit local governments from requiring telecom
companies to obtain a franchise to use rights-of-way but would
grandfather franchise agreements in effect May 1.  The bill would
prohibit rights-of-way rental fees but would authorize local
governments to impose rights-of-way permit fees, which would be
limited to "actual, substantiated costs reasonably incurred" in
managing the public rights-of-way.

Local governments would have to process rights-of-way permit
applications within 31 days after receiving a complete
application.  Telecom and cable TV companies would be authorized
to identify rights-of-way permit fees on customer bills.

______________________________________________________

GEORGIA -- WorldCom says FX calls subject to 'recip comp'

WorldCom, Inc., has asked the Public Service Commission to
determine that calls originated by BellSouth Telecommunications,
Inc.'s customers to competitive local exchange carriers' foreign-
exchange (FX) customers should be considered local and therefore
subject to reciprocal compensation.  Proper treatment of FX
traffic is required to meet item 13 (reciprocal compensation) of
section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996's 14-
point "competitive checklist," MCI said.

Treating CLECs' FX traffic as long distance provides "significant
competitive advantages" to BellSouth because it permits BellSouth
to assess access charges on local calls and "shields BellSouth's
local FX service from competition," WorldCom said.  (Docket no.
6863-U)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- ALJ suggests requiring Pacific Bell to permit
intraLATA toll presubscription

Administrative Law Judge Karen Jones has recommended that the
Public Utilities Commission require Pacific Bell to permit
MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC's customers to
presubscribe to Pacific Bell's intraLATA (local access and
transport area) long distance service.  The recommendation was
made in a draft arbitrator's report about the companies'
interconnection agreement.

Pacific Bell said the requirement would be confusing to customers
and would require the company to identify a separate billing
channel or generate a bill solely for intraLATA long distance
service.

"It is blatantly discriminatory for Pacific to refuse to provide
intraLATA toll service to MCI's local service customers," Ms.
Jones said.  She said, "Pacific's arguments of 'customer
confusion' and 'billing' concerns do not have merit."  "Customers
could receive three different bills for the three different
services, and other carriers cope with billing for only one of
those three services.  There is no reason that Pacific should not
be able to provide a bill which includes only intraLATA
services."  Comments on the draft arbitrator's report are due
June 20.  (Application 01-01-010)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- PUC extends deadline for Pacific Bell interLATA
filing

Public Utilities Commissioner Geoffrey Brown has extended Pacific
Bell's deadline for filing information demonstrating its
compliance with the interLATA (local access and transport area)
market-entry requirements of section 709.2 of California code.
The section requires the PUC to find that permitting Pacific Bell
to enter the California interLATA market doesn't harm the long
distance market substantially.  The commission also must find
that Pacific Bell's entry is based on fully open local exchange
access and that the company isn't engaging in anticompetitive
behavior or improper cross-subsidization.  (5/7/01)

Pacific Bell asked the PUC to extend the deadline from June 4
until "mid-June," when the company plans to file its section 271
application with the PUC.  Mr. Brown granted the company's
request and said he would establish a comment filing schedule
after Pacific has filed its section 709.2 assessment and section
271 application.  (Rulemaking nos. 93-04-003 and 95-04-043 and
Investigation nos. 93-04-002 and 95-04-044)

______________________________________________________

IOWA -- Board mulls revoking LTDS's certificate

The Utilities Board has ordered LTDS Corp. to demonstrate why its
operating certificate shouldn't be revoked.  The board is
concerned that "actions on the part of LTDS do not appear to be
the actions of a bona fide competitive local exchange carrier."

The board said there appears to be no voice traffic from or to an
LTDS customer in any exchange other than Fairfield.  The company
ordered and then cancelled orders for voice trunks in the Pella,
Chariton, and Centerville exchanges.  It ordered trunks in the
Grinnell and Sigourney exchanges, although it has no assigned
"NXX" codes there.  The company's tariff also fails to include a
residential rate.  It was deleted in a Jan. 19 tariff revision,
the board said.

It said state law obligates each local exchange utility to serve
all eligible customers within the utility's service territory,
unless explicitly excepted from the requirement by the board.
(Iowa Code section 476.29(5))

LTDS must file direct testimony by June 22.  Petitions to
intervene are due July 3.  Additional comments from the consumer
advocate and intervenors are due July 17.  Prepared rebuttal
testimony from LTDS will be due Aug. 3.  A hearing is scheduled
for Aug. 14.  (Docket no. TCU-01-13 - In Re: LTDS Corporation)

______________________________________________________

NEBRASKA -- PSC to discuss implementing '511'

The Public Service Commission has scheduled an Aug. 15 workshop
to address implementation of the "511" dialing code as an
Advanced Traveler Weather Information System (ATWIS).  It will
provide route-specific weather forecasts and road condition
reports to callers based on specific location information they
provide.

The PSC approved implementation of 511 for the ATWIS May 23.  The
commission directed the Department of Roads and the Nebraska
State Patrol to begin deploying the ATWIS.  (Application no. C-
2506/PI-48 - In the Matter of the Application of the Commission,
on its own motion, to seek comment on the establishment and
implementation of '511' as a statewide three-digit calling number
reserved for access to ATWIS)

______________________________________________________

NEBRASKA -- PSC seeks copies of MDU contracts

The Public Service Commission has requested by June 15 copies of
all contracts that all certified telecom carriers have entered
into with multiple dwelling units (MDUs).

In April 1999 the PSC issued an order clarifying its policy for
residential MDU access.  Qwest Corp. appealed the PSC's order to
the Nebraska Supreme Court, which affirmed a majority of it.  The
court remanded to the PSC the issue of whether the rates it set
for MDU access comply with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Eighth Circuit's (St. Louis) decision in Iowa Utilities Board v.
FCC (120 F. 3d 753).

After reviewing the case's testimony, the PSC said it's
"disturbed" that some telecom carriers still may be utilizing
contracts with MDUs that contain exclusive access and/or
exclusive marketing provisions "in apparent blatant disregard of
prior orders of this commission, as well as the FCC."  (Docket
no. C-2534/PI-50 - The Commission, on its own motion, to examine
the potential noncompliance with Commission orders entered in
Docket no. C-1878/PI-23)

______________________________________________________

CONNECTICUT -- DPUC expands Lifeline assistance in tribal areas

The Department of Public Utility Control has amended its Lifeline
plan to enhance assistance to individuals living on American
Indian tribal lands.  The measure adds language proposed by
Southern New England Telecommunications, which enhances
"subscribership and infrastructure deployment" within American
Indian communities by including a Lifeline credit of up to $30.25
per month and reducing Link Up service connection charges to
qualified applicants by $100.

The amendment follows an Oct. 5, 2000, FCC order to encourage
increased subscribership and infrastructure rollout in tribal
areas.  (Common Carrier docket 96-45)

______________________________________________________

MICHIGAN -- Customers can bring complaints without counsel

The Public Service Commission yesterday ruled that business and
residential telephone customers can bring "slamming" or
"cramming" complaints to the commission without the assistance of
an attorney.  The PSC's ruling involved a complaint filed by
Seaway Painting LLC against WorldCom, Inc., about a billing
dispute.

The PSC dismissed the complaint, as requested by the petitioner,
but concluded that Seaway may refile its complaint and proceed
"with the assistance of a person of its choice, who need not be a
licensed attorney."  The commission based its decision on a
provision of the Michigan Telecommunications Act, which provides,
"Hearings shall be conducted in a manner as to optimize
expediency, convenience, and the ability of end users to bring
and prosecute, without the assistance of counsel, complaints
alleging [slamming or cramming] while preserving the rights of
the parties."  (Case no. U-12863)

______________________________________________________

OREGON -- Group criticizes AT&T price hike

The Qwest Communications International, Inc.-backed Oregon
Coalition for Consumer Choice yesterday criticized AT&T Corp. for
its recent announcement of an 11% increase in consumer long
distance rates.  "This rate hike from AT&T just underscore the
importance of bringing real competition to the Oregon long
distance market," said Dan Lavey, coalition director.

The group said Qwest's entry into the Oregon interLATA (local
access and transport area) market would save a customer who made
only one 10-minute long distance call $2.80 per month, more than
$33 a year, over AT&T.

______________________________________________________

MINNESOTA -- MP Telecom upgrades network

MP Telecom, the telecom subsidiary of Minnesota Power, yesterday
announced that it has completed a major upgrade of its fiber
optic network with dense wavelength division multiplexing
technology.  The upgrade allows the company to increase greatly
data capacity serve to its customers in Minneapolis-St. Paul,
Duluth, St. Cloud, Brainerd, Grand Rapids, Hibbing, Virginia, and
Eveleth.

The company also has completed a 395-mile fiber optic network
connecting southern Minnesota to Minneapolis-St. Paul.  This
network ties in Rochester, Owatonna, Albert Lea, Austin, Winona,
and Red Wing.

______________________________________________________

MASSACHUSETTS -- CTC activates Springfield fiber network

CTC Communications has activated one of its four fiber networks
in western Massachusetts.  CTC PowerPath customers in Springfield
currently use the network, which was purchased from a variety of
dark fiber suppliers under a 20-year lease agreement and light up
by Cisco System, Inc., optronics.

The company said it will activate fiber access to its network in
over 60 locations throughout the New England and Mid Atlantic
states this year.

______________________________________________________

GEORGIA -- AGL networks to install fiber in Atlanta

AGL Networks LLC has started building a fiber network in Atlanta.
It will include 616 conduit miles in Atlanta's central business
district and the cities of Buckhead, Galleria, and Sandy Springs.
AGL Networks is a subsidiary of AGL Resources, Inc., an energy
services holding company that serves customers in Georgia,
Tennessee, and Virginia.

======================== END =========================

To view this issue online, go to http://www.tr.com/statenews/.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including
electronic, without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 2000, 2001 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc.  (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day, except holidays.

Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Jennifer Erschen, E-mail: mailto:jerschen@tr.com
Editor

Gayle Kansagor, E-mail: mailto:gkansagor@tr.com
Associate Editor-Online Publications

Steve Arlowe,  E-mail: mailto:sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst

Susan McGovern,  E-mail: mailto:smcgovern@tr.com
Senior Telecommunications Analyst

Victoria Curtis,  E-mail: mailto:vcurtis@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst

Account Services:
Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 312-6065 (fax), E-mail:
mailto:ecallahan@tr.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
09/13/2000 05:19 PM
To: John Disturnal/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: correlation triangle

John,

Thanks for the fax.  I think we can build a similar model as in fx market
outlined in my writing attached below.
Give me your comments and we will make it work.

Zimin


More questions.  Most of them are already answered.  Thanks!
Ben


Just to save you from having to call me, my husband Thomas Burton and I will
attend the dinner on May 13.  Just let me know what to bring.

Andrea J. Preisinger
Employee Relations
Methodist Health Care System
713-394-6685 (office)
713-790-5099 (fax)
713-404-8302 (pager)
preisinger@tmh.tmc.edu


Am I supposed to do anything here?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 04:53 PM -----

	Stephen H Douglas
	05/31/2000 12:23 PM

		 To: pwright@llgm.com, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Language for the Confirmation

Below is slightly revised language to be included in the ISDA agreement being
entered into in connection with the EEX transaction.  Not having the
transaction documentation to review in connection with this clause, I have
bracketed several portions of the clause to be filled in as dictated by such
documentation.  Please call with any follow up.  Steve.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

Morris Richard Clark
05/30/2000 07:24 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Language for the Confirmation

Tana,

The language in the Schedule should reflect what is in our Form#3, whereby
"Enron Re:" is the U.S. entity and "Swiss RE - EFR" is a Barbados entity.
Also, the tax form requested should be a W-8.

In addition, the following language should be added to the confirmation:

United States Federal Income Tax Characterization and Reporting.  The parties
recognize and intend that, for United States federal income tax purposes, any
payment by [Enron Re] of the [Floating - this assumes that Enron Re is paying
such amount] Amount will be treated as a payment pursuant to a guaranty by
[Enron Re][of the obligations of Bob West Treasure, LLC to make payments
pursuant to Section ___ of the [underlying Financing Agreement between Bob
West Treasure and Royal Bank of Canada - this needs to be clarifed - is the
payment related to the RBC loan or the insurance payment by EFR?  If it is
the RBC loan then this clause is appropriate but if, alternatively, it is the
EFR insurance payment, then the reference needs to be changed accordingly.]]
The parties agree that to the extent either of the parties is required to
report any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit relating to the
Transaction for United States federal income tax purposes, such party shall
report such item consistent with the characterization set forth above and
shall not take any position on any tax return or report relating to United
States federal income taxes which is inconsistent with such
characterization.  The parties recognize that the manner in which they have
agreed to characterize the Transaction for United States federal income tax
purposes may be different from the manner in which the Transaction is
characterized for non-United States federal income tax purposes and for
accounting, regulatory or other purposes.  The provisions of this Section are
not intended to affect the manner in which the parties report the Transaction
for such other purposes, or the interpretation of the provisions of the
Confirmation and the rights and obligations of the Parties arising hereunder,
for any purposes.


The January check just arrived at Chantilly. Kathy is fedexing it directly to
Cash Management for morning delivery.  The late receipt is due to the fact
that
it was addressed to the old Fairfax office and not to the Irvine CA address
requested on the invoice.   I just spoke to Robin Barbe (who checked with
their
accounting staff) and understand that Enron feels that the effort to stop the
check, and immediately execute a wire transfer would not be productive.
Regards,
Roman

Paulette Heuer
03/30/2000 11:00 AM

To:   Joan.Veselack@enron.com
cc:   Roman Bakke/EME@EME, Dick.Jenkins@enron.com, Robin.Barbe@enron.com,
      Chris.Germany@enron.com, Mark.Feldman@enron.com,
      Victor.Lamadrid@enron.com, Katherine.L.Kelly@enron.com, Leslie R.
      Shafer/EME@EME, Chereyl Spencer/EME@EME

Subject:  January OPT 60 Payment

Joan,

CALP has received the wire transfer payment for the month of February (thank
you).  However, January's check , which was mailed on March 24th, has still
not
arrived.  I have to make both a debt payment and a partner distribution on
Monday, April 3rd. Since the partners only receive distributions twice a year,
it would be helpful if CALP received Januarys payment.  Could Enron put a stop
payment on January's check and have the funds wire transferred to CALP's
account
tomorrow?  Anything you could do would be helpful.

Thanks!

Paulette


Attached are two letter our commercial lead on the salt soaked unti wants to
send.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:14
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           11/08/2000 12:40 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: My Changes to Westinghouse Letters

Kay:

Please review the attached, in particular letter 1 which deals with setting
the record straight on events to date. Thanks.

Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 12:24
PM ---------------------------

Roseann Engeldorf
08/14/2000 11:23 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
bcc:

Subject: Turbines Galore

Rob made some changes in the e-mail I sent last Friday.  He put the info
about the Assignment and Assumption Agreement in para. 2 and used more
defined terms from the ADA.

I think we can use the same A&A agreement to notify WestLB of our intent to
assign the P.O. and give notice as to the closing date.  However, the current
form of A&A agreement has sig. blocks for only ENA and WestLB.  Seems like
you need a sig. for the assuming party!  Particularly since that party is
purporting to give notice to WestLB of its intent to pay the purchase price!

Rose

To effectuate the movement of turbines out of the WestLB LM6000 structures
the following needs to take place:

1) ADA - Assignment of the Purchase Option.  On at least 5 (five) days notice
to WestLB, ENA will assign the Purchase Option for the subject equipment and
ancillary agreement to the purchasing entity.  This assignment (the
"Assignment")  must release the Lessor (WestLB)  from all its obligations
under the Turbine Purchase Agreement with respect to the subject equipment
and ancillary agreements.  This means that GE Packaged Power (a division of
GE) and other vendors must release WestLB from its obligations with respect
to the subject equipment and contracts.  (Kay - Could this be done by an
amendment to the scheduled equipment under the various agreements between
WestLB and the various vendors? Rose - I believe so, along with entering into
the new contracts reference in 3))

The assignment agreement to effect this is explained below and can be
prepared by Kay, Rose or Rob.

2) ADA - Closing of the Purchase Option.  WestLB requires at least 5 (five)
days written notice of the exercise of the purchase option and  this notice
can be included in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement.   The purchase
price for the subject equipment and agreements will be the "Termination
Amount" as defined in the ADA, as allocable to the subject equipment and
contracts.  This amount is equal to the sum of i) the aggregate outstanding
amount of the Advances, plus ii) any Transaction Expenses then due and owing.
plus iii) all accrued amounts due on any Lessor Yield or Facility Fee, plus
iv) any amounts owed for any costs reasonably incurred by the Lessor with
respect to the subject equipment and contracts.  The particular amounts of
the foregoing costs and fees allocable to the subject equipment and contracts
should be determined in coordination with Lisa Bills and Humberto Cubillos.

The Assignment and Assumption Agreement  used to consummate the Purchase
Option is attached as Exhibit G to the ADA and can be prepared by Kay, Rose
or Rob.  It needs to be executed by ENA, ENA's Designee as assignee and
WestLB.  A detailed list of the equipment and contracts being assigned must
be prepared by the assignee and attached to the assignment.

3) Assignment under the Turbine Purchase Agreement.  The Purchaser (WestLB)
under the Turbine Purchase Agreement (the "Turbine Contract") may assign a
portion of its rights and obligations under the Turbine Contract to an
affiliate of ENA without the Seller's consent.  Kay has structured the
Turbine Contract to allow the assignee to enter into separate purchase
agreements with GE Packaged Power for the equipment being assigned.   The
documents to transfer title of the equipment from WestLB (in the case of
equipment that is already fabricated) and  to replace ENA with another
business unit on the purchase agreement should be prepared by the business
unit attorneys involved in the transfer, based on a form of contract which is
very similiar to the Master Purchase Agreement. (Rose - the assignee/new
owner needs to step into the turbine contract even if title has  passed to
WestLB, as there are lots of rights (warranty, indemnity) the new owner needs
to have.  It seems to me that you would transfer title in the assignment,
then step into the remainder of the other rights in the new contract - a/k/a
facility agreement.  Then you delete the assigned equipment from the Master
Agreement.)

 The tax specialists from both ENA and the acquiring business units should be
advised as to the planned date of title transfer.

 Same generally holds true for the ABB transformers, except that the
assignment to an Enron SPV may require a form of security.


Tim always tells me EPMI's biggest problem about accessing transmission
with the ISO is the lack of public information.  Tim wants all ISO
information - as he says "more, better, faster."  In other words he wants:
meter and outage information, water levels, bids and schedules, actual
flows, transmission availability and congestion.

Making this information available is necessary for three reasons.  This
information would help the market to police itself and provide better price
signals producing a more efficient market.  It would remove competitive
advantages held by monopsony load servers and generators owning a large
percentage of the generation in the market.  It would also, as Sue points
out, remove the transmission availability knowledge advantage held by the
grandfathered transmission contract holders.

Susan J Mara@EES
09/08/2000 12:06 PM

To:   Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc:   Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:  Re: ANSWERING YOUR QUESTIONS ON CA TRANSMISSION ACCESS  (Document
link: Mary Hain)

OK.  I'll take a shot in answering your questions, Steve. Others are free
to comment as well.

The transmission issues in the ISO are greatly lessened.  If you talk to
the traders, they LOVE it.  Before April1, 1998, they had no sales to CA.
Now, they have millions of dollars of sales.  Why?  -- no transmission
access to speak of before the ISO took over.

We still have some problems, however.  The problems have been there since
day one and FERC has punted on them.  We have a huge FERC case dealing with
many of them.  We also appealed a stupid FERC order on Path 15 probably at
least a year ago and have heard nothing from FERC on it. The traders have
also seriously considered a FERC complaint on Path 15.

So, what are the access issues?

Path 15 is the major constraint point between northern and southern CA.
Has been for years. The transmission fix is basically adding a third
intertie line between Tracy and Tesla. When I left PG&E in 1996, the
estimated coast was $300 million.  The congestion costs did not justify
building the line then.

PG&E continues to control Path 15 and tells the ISO what's left after PG&E
allocates the capacity and decides what the rating is and when it changes.
There is no transparency.  PG&E has the ability to use Path 15 to advantage
Diablo Canyon given the existing contracts.  Carl has looked into it
somewhat and doesn't think PG&E is, but;... The ISO says it can't interpret
PG&E's contracts with the munis and filed some funky thing with FERC about
how it's some kind of overseer -- we protested and have now appealed.  The
munis have been receiving preferential access since Day One -- their
contracts were generally subservient to the IOU rights -- more like
interruptible -- but once the ISO started, all of a sudden, the muni rights
became super firm superceding the IOU rights (as far as we can tell from
sketchy filings and discussions with ISO staff). That's why we have pushed
the issue.  Also, Dynegy and Power Exchange (not the PX) have rights on
Path 15.  Tim Belden would love to get some info on how that constaint is
being operated.

Information in general is pretty sketchy on real-time transmission.  We
have complained to the ISO about how the ISO knows what's going on in
transmission (as do the utilities), changes what it does, which then
changes prices, and then doesn't tell us until after the fact.  The ISO has
promised to do better, but I don't think has implemented any real changes
yet.

Advantageous access.

Except for what's going on in Path 15, I don't think the IOUs have any
advantages on access -- except with respect to Regulatory Must Run
resources like nuclear and hydro -- but I think it's resource specific,
rather than owner specific. The munis are another story.  See next item.

Munis Preference

This is a huge issue here and I assume across the country.  In making a
devil's bargain with the munis, the FERC has put the ISO into an untenable
situation.  The "sanctity of contracts" under any and all conditions has
created preference for incumbents (not the IOUs -- but everyone who had a
transmission contract with the IOUs) and poor rights for those poor
schlepps like us who have come into the new market.  The ISO cannot operate
the system this way and is forced to give the munis/Dynegy more than they
had originally and to let them do things no one else can do (e.g., some
munis get to change their schedule after the actrive hour begins, some get
to do it every half hour, so far most haven't had to pay for ancillary
services, etc.)

There are many, many examples of how we are discriminated against (in
addition to Path 15) and of how FERC has shined us on -- but yet we fight
on. The most recent muni giveaway is the litigation surrounding the "new"
transmission charge for CA -- into this has been entangled the rules for
munis joining the ISO.  The munis want huge handouts to join. And part of
the "new" T rate includes hundreds of millions of subsidies for munis --
I've pointed out that this amounts to the IOU's customers paying for the
munis' stranded transmission costs, when they are already paying for the
IOUs' stranded generation costs, but this argument fell on deaf ears in the
ISO.  It's really not our issue, but it does make you kind of sick about
where public policy stands in this state.

Feel free to call (415) 782-7802

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 07:43 AM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed
away from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its
ISO and PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other
parts of the country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in
priorities for utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path
15"?  Does that control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there
other examples and are there links between these "preferences" and the
current problems in California?  As we are trying to convert reliability
and pricing concerns into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to
have available to us.


CES is buying 2500 dth/day from Equitable in Tenn Z4.  CES is selling 2500
dth/day to FirstEnergy in Tenn Z4.  Looks like a match to me.  I told Fred
with Equitable the information John Singer gave to Phil below.  For future
reference Fred's number is 412-395-3295.  A backup contact at Equitable is
Steve Rafferty, 412-395-3268.

Per John, FirstEnergy bought the meter (??) from Beldon & Blake effective
12/1/99.  On CNG, we are showing a purchase (deal 141688) and a sale (deal
141952) for 2500 dth/day with Beldon & Blake.  I don't see a sale anywhere to
FirstEnergy.

Also, I still see an Equitable supply (deal 135956) on CNG for 3226 dth/day.
I believe this is a duplicate of deal 138741 in Tetco M2.

Comments?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 10:23
AM ---------------------------

pvillag@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/29/99 03:29:10 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jan sale to FirstEnergy @ Carroll Co Meter

Chris,

This has to do with that TENN zone 4 deal that you e-mailed me about this
morning. Like I mentioned earlier, we never scheduled this gas, it was handled
on a back to back basis.

Phil

---------------------- Forwarded by Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/29/99
03:33 PM ---------------------------

John Singer
12/29/99 03:05 PM

To: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Jan sale to FirstEnergy @ Carroll Co Meter

Phil,
FirstEnergy called to change the contract number for the sale I made to them
(originally to Belden & Blake) to be delivered to the Carroll Co Meter.  The
new contract number is 32082.
If you receive this email before you page me, that's what the page is about.
Call or email me with any questions.
Thanks,
John

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Mr.  Germany,  will be inputting the Dayton sales for TGT into sitara for
Abril?

graci


<<CSFB_EnergyTech_May1701.pdf>>

Summary:

* U.S. President George W. Bush unveiled his National Energy Policy
today.  In our report we list the recommendations made by the National
Energy Policy Development Group (NEPD) as they pertain to Renewable and
Alternative Energy.  In addition, following each recommendation, we provide
our views on the potential impacts on specific CSFB covered companies
(AstroPower - APWR, Ballard Power Systems - BLDP, Capstone Turbine - CPST,
FuelCell Energy - FCEL, Proton Energy Systems - PRTN) in the Energy
Technology sector.
* We would note that many of the recommendations instruct certain
departments or individuals to conduct further research on various topics and
to report back to the President at a later date.  Our view is that many were
included as a counter point to more contentious issues and may receive
somewhat limited action from the Administration.
* Overall, we are not changing our estimates or recommendations on any
of our companies at this point in time.  The proposed solar tax credit
when/if passed will cause us to review our forecasts for AstroPower.  We are
not forecasting incremental unit volume of production given the capacity
constraint of the company, although residential installations tend to have a
higher revenue per watt and higher margins than non-residential markets and
therefore could result in higher EPS contribution.

Regards,

Marko Pencak
416-352-4580
Cameron Jeffreys (Associate)
416-352-4581

Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON

 - CSFB_EnergyTech_May1701.pdf


Lorraine, here is the letter.  You will need to fill in the address;
otherwise it's ready to go.  Let me know if you need anything else (including
initialling).


The new deal should have the same price as the deal that you copied.

D

Michael Olsen@ENRON
02/26/2001 02:54 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 637225

This is the deal we made for El Paso last Friday to replace deal 235670,
which had Teco.  Julie Meyers needs a price to be added to the deal.  Which
price should I add?


Sara Shackleton is ill today and will not be attending the Raptor lunch
meeting.

Kaye


Sounds exciting.  Keep me up to date on how everything is going.

Talk to you soon,

Kevin


We are in bid week right now, so I have to work late and can not take
vacation, so I am catching a 10 p.m. flight out tomorrow and get to auburn
about 2 a.m.  I will be at your brother's by 7:15 a.m. on game day - you
better be ready.  I am coming in on Thursday night for the Georgia game and
may stay in Birmingham that night...any vacancies?  I think we may play golf
on Friday.
PL


[Nelson, Cheryl]  Good morning, I am in early today because I am leaving early for the day a 3:30 p.m. doctor's appointment that will take the rest of the afternoon.


Kimat, I copied Sep forward on deal 202939 to deal 380571 and changed the
counterparty to new power.


-----Original Message-----
From: Esproull@aol.com [mailto:Esproull@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 2:39 PM
To: daren@barkerassociates.com; Whitt, Mark; diamondj1@msn.com;
ckwagoner@rexnet.net; sjernig@entergy.com; Croozr531@aol.com;
randmbarlow@webtv.net
Subject: Fwd: FW: To My Dear Wife

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <mappling@chematch.com>
To: McAfee, Larry <lmcafee@chematch.com>, Creasman, Scott <screasman@chematch.com>, Arthur Carpentier (E-mail) <acarpentier@pyapc.com>, Dwayne Hyzak (E-mail) <dhyzak@quantaservices.com>, David Zaozirny (E-mail) <david.l.zaozirny@us.arthurandersen.com>, Jeff Sproull (E-mail) <Esproull@aol.com>, Wade Sanders (E-mail) <wsanders@qup.com>
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:32:46 GMT
Subject:

To My Dear Wife:
During the past year I have tried to make love to you 365 times. I have succeeded 36 times, which is an average of once every ten days. The following is a list of why I did not succeed more often:

54 times the sheets were clean
17 times it was too late
49 times you were too tired
20 times it was too hot
15 times you pretended to be asleep
22 times you had a headache
17 times you were afraid of waking the baby
16 times you said you were too sore
12 times it was the wrong time of the month
19 times you had to get up early
9 times you said weren't in the mood
7 times you were sunburned
6 times you were watching the late show
5 times you didn't want to mess up your new hairdo
3 times you said the neighbors would hear us
9 times you said your mother would hear us
Of the 36 times I did succeed, the activity was not satisfactory because:

6 times you just laid there
8 times you reminded me there's a crack in the ceiling
4 times you told me to hurry up and get it over with
7 times I had to wake you and tell you I finished
1 time I was afraid I had hurt you because I felt you move

To My Dear Husband:
I think you have things a little confused. Here are the reasons you didn't get more than you did:
5 times you came home drunk and tried to screw the cat
36 times you did not come home at all
21 times you didn't cum
33 times you came too soon
19 times you went soft before you got in
38 times you worked too late
10 times you got cramps in your toes
29 times you had to get up early to play golf
2 times you were in a fight and someone kicked you
    in the balls
4 times you got it stuck in your zipper
3 times you had a cold and your nose was running
2 times you had ! ! a splinter in your finger
20 times you lost the notion after thinking about it all day
6 times you came in your pajamas while reading a dirty book
98 times you were too busy watching football, baseball, etc. on TV

Of the times we did get together:
The reason I laid still was because you missed and were screwing the sheets.
I wasn't talking about the crack in the ceiling, what I said was, "Would you prefer me on my back or kneeling?"
The time you felt me move was because you farted and I was trying to breathe.

Once you read this letter you have to keep it going.
This game has been played since 1996.
You must send this letter to 7 people.
On the 5th day someone will ask you out or say "I love you."
This is not a joke.  It has worked for many years.
If you break the chain, you will have bad luck with guys/girls
forever.
This is just for future readers.
This began in 1996, not much of a past, but it works.
So here are the rules:
*If you read this on a Sunday, wish for a really fun week
*If you read this on a Monday, wish for money
*If you read this on a Tuesday, wish for love
*If you read this on a Wednesday, wish for success
*If you read this on a Thursday, wish for anything you want
*If you read this on a Friday, wish for a really hot date
*If you read this on a Saturday, wish for an important phone call
Send this to seven people (after you make a wish).
Make sure it is sent as soon as you read it or your wish won't come true.


- MJUN0700.doc


Dear Mark

While your judgment is normally so sound, do you really think we are headed in the right direction here with next Friday's designated speaker.  Is this appropriate for this super important, interested, motivated and highly discriminating group?  Enthusiasm is evident but  ....

Your dutiful, obedient servant, only desirous of what's best for Enron.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCullough, Travis
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:50 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: ISDA North American Energy and Developing Products Committee Meet	ing- July 27, 2001 --11:30 a.m.(EST)/10:30 a.m.(Central)

thanks -- I'm really looking forward to sharing my thoughts on this topic.  It's high time that people start seeing things my way on the whole subject of cross-commodity master trading agreements, and this is just the forum for me to further my agenda and launch my diabolical master plan ... BWAAA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA.

Am I scaring you?

Travis C. McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3882A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax:      (713) 646-3393/3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sager, Elizabeth
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	McCullough, Travis
Subject:	FW: ISDA North American Energy and Developing Products Committee Meet	ing- July 27, 2001 --11:30 a.m.(EST)/10:30 a.m.(Central)

Just in case I forgot earlier - good luck (materials I promise are on the way DOWN to you)
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Stacy+20Carey+20+3CSCAREY+40ISDA+2EORG+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Robert M. Coors; 'JEFFREYS@CAPITAL-RE.COM'; 'LABRAMS@AIGI.COM'; 'MDOUVAS@AIGI.COM'; Daniel Cunningham; 'MCARROLL@VITOLGE.COM'; 'MCDERMME@BP.COM'; 'RDILWORTH@BOFASECURITIES.COM'; 'BOBNA@ART.COM'; 'JOTOOLE@MONTGOMERY.COM'; 'JAMES.WHITMORE@BMO.COM'; 'JMASUDA@BTMNA.COM'; 'GUY.DEMPSEY@BARCLAYSCAPITAL.COM'; 'SMANN@BRR.COM'; 'PUSUNG@BAYLBNY.COM'; 'NANCY.PERSECHINO@BINGHAM.COM'; 'JOHN.PEARSON@CIBC.CA.COM'; 'CHRISTOPHER.NYGARD@CIBC.COM'; 'LINDA_LANE@CARGILL.COM'; 'DAVID_GABNEE@CARGILL.COM'; 'NICK_SUMMERS@CARGILL.COM'; 'JUDY_HINKLIN@CARGILL.COM'; 'MARA_ALEXANDER@CARGILL.COM'; 'KATHY_GERKIN@CARGILL.COM'; 'MIKE_GROVER@CARGILL.COM'; 'MARC_RUBENSTEIN@CARGILL.COM'; 'PHILIP.LEVY@CHASE.COM'; 'PAUL.MOELLER@CESOURCE.COM'; 'KATHLEEN.JONES@CONSTELLATION.COM'; 'AREYNAUD@CORAL_ENERGY.COM'; 'MHELMA@CORAL_ENERGY.COM'; 'CHIP.GOODRICH@DB.COM'; 'LKLEIN@DEWEYBALLANTINE.COM'; 'MMUNRO@DOW.COM'; 'FRUIZ@DOW.COM'; 'MTKAY@DOW.COM'; 'LHERMANN@DUKE-ENERGY.COM'; 'CGRAEBNER@DUKE-ENERGY.COM'; 'BJACOBS@DUKE-ENERGY.COM'; 'AEABBOT@DUKE-ENERGY.COM'; 'JCHE@DYENERGY.COM'; 'DRWE@DYENERGY.COM'; 'PJPA@DYNERGY.COM'; 'GSFO@DYNEGY.COM'; Brad Farnsworth; 'WEDE@DYNEY.COM'; 'MSFA@DYNEGY.COM'; 'GKLA@DYNEGY.COM'; 'HEMU@DYNEGY.COM'; 'JONES@EPENERGY.COM'; 'WAGNER@EPENERG.COM'; 'SHUTTEEJ@EPENERGY.COM'; 'ERICKSONB@EPENERGY.COM'; 'SIDDALLD@EPENERGY.COM'; 'KIMBALLS@EPENERGY.COM'; 'MALCOMR@EPENERGY.COM'; 'HOFERC@EPENERGY.COM'; 'COOPERS@EPENERGY.COM'; 'HEBENSTREIT@EPENERGY.COM'; 'LUMS@EPENERGY.COM'; 'ECHOLSJ@EPENERGY.COM'; 'JAMESONK@EPENERGY.COM'; 'NAGELS@EPENERGY.COM'; 'ARASPE@ELEMENTRE.COM'; 'LCLEMMONS@ELEMENTRE.COM'; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Sager, Elizabeth; Haedicke, Mark E.; 'GLEN.HECHT@EY.COM'; 'LAURA.TORRES@EY.COM'; 'CARYN_M_POLOSKE@EMAIL.MOBIL.COM'; 'RALPH_N_JOHANSON@EMAIL.MOBIL.COM'; 'NOREEN_M_TAMA@EMAIL.MOBIL.COM'; 'SHUI-I-SETO@FLEET.COM'; 'CAROLANNE.GARDNER@GECAPITAL.COM'; 'ALAN.GREEN@GECAPITAL.COM'; 'WENDY.ORMOND@LAW.GE.COM'; 'GLENN.GOGGINS@GECAPITAL.COM'; 'COLIN.BURRELL@GECAPITAL.COM'; 'ED.GREBECK@GECAPITAL.COM'; 'PATRICIA.HOGAN@GS.COM'; 'STEVEN.BUNKIN@GS.COM'; Bob Mancini; 'CCERRIA@HESS.COM'; 'FYATES@HESS.COM'; 'JLOPEZ@HESS.COM'; 'DDELLACONA@HESS.COM'; 'GAUDREAU.GILLES@HYDRO.QC.CA'; Louise Guillemette; 'PAUL-HUS.REAL@HYDRO.QC.CA'; 'POULIOT.MARIE@HYDRO.QC.CA'; 'FUGERE.ALAIN@HYDRO.QC.CA'; 'CAROLYN_LOVERRO@INFINITY.COM'; 'PALAZZO_CHIARA@JPMORGAN.COM'; 'THOMPSON_DON@JPMORGAN.COM'; 'AZAIM@KPMG.COM'; 'GTLEE@LLGM.COM'; 'FWU@LLGM.COM'; 'BRYAN.ADEL@MCD.COM'; 'MICHAEL.IRGANG@MCD.COM'; Carlton D. Pearl; 'GLORIA.SANTONA@MCD.COM'; 'RICHARD.MIKE@MCD.COM'; 'SCHULTZ.HARVEY@MCD.COM'; 'WCHAN@MILBANK.COM'; 'BMCCOY@MORGAN.COM'; 'EPSTEIN@MS.COM'; 'R.CONE@NABNY.COM'; 'GREG.MALCOLM@ONTARIOPOWERGENERATION.COM'; 'MEG.TIMBERG@ONTARIOPOWERGENERATION.COM'; 'BILL.GARVIN@ONTARIOPOWERGENERATION.COM'; 'EDWARD.KIM@PSEG.COM'; 'EDWARD.KIM@PSEG.COM'; 'STEVEN.TITELMAN@PSEG.COM'; 'JAN.PLUMAKER@PSEG.COM'; 'JBANDMAN@PREBON.COM'; 'STEVE.BARR@GEMSLGOV.BC.CA'; 'SCOTT_DIAMOND@PRUFEC.COM'; 'DONALD.LEIBOWITZ@PSEG.COM'; 'CYNTHIA.MIDURA@PSEG.COM'; 'JOHN.SCHMIDT@PSEG.COM'; 'MARIA.SALVATORE@PSEG.COM'; 'JOHN.MCDERMOTT@PSEG.COM'; 'JONATHON_D_PUCKETT@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'CHRISTY_B_BRINKMAN@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'KELLY_L_MCEVOY@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'CREGG_D_LANCASTER@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'JANNALYN_GALLOWAY@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'DRUSSO@RELIANTENERGY.COM'; 'STEVEN.J.KELTZ@SSMB.COM'; 'HWEST@SHERMAN.COM'; 'DPARISI@SHERMAN.COM'; 'JFARNSWO@SKADDEN.COM'; 'MGOLDSTEIN@STROOCK.COM'; 'LKREEN@STROOCK.COM'; 'RAISLERK@SULLCROM.COM'; 'JAMES_BAKER@SUMMITHQ.COM'; 'DFRANK@SABLAW.COM'; 'MYALE@SABLAW.COM'; 'JGROVER@TXU.COM'; 'BHELTON@TXU.COM'; 'TPOWELL@TXU.COM'; 'TONOFRIO@TRACTEBELUSA.COM'; 'SUSAN_POULSON@TRANSCANADA.COM'; 'GARY_MOLNAR@TRANSCANADA.COM'; 'JANINE_WATSON@TRANSCANADA.COM'; 'CHRISTINE_JOHNSTON@TRANSCANADA.COM'; F.B. Cochran lll; 'DBLYTH@VELAW.COM'; 'RFREDRICKSON@VELAW.COM'; 'ACURRY@VELAW.COM'; 'RBAIRD@VELAW.COM'; 'OBYAZITOGLU@VELAW.COM'; 'RRABALAIS@VELAW.COM'; 'PTHEOFANIDIS@VELAW.COM'; 'JDILG@VELAW.COM'; 'GLENNON@VITOLGE.COM'; 'JRINTELL@VITOLGE.COM'; 'WILLIAM.SULLIVAN@WDR.COM'; 'KAUMANE.D.BURTON@WELLSFARGO.COM'; 'MILLER@NEWYORK.WHITECASE.COM'; 'HOWARD.SACAROB@GECAP.com'; 'PMACMILLAN@ONTARIOPOWERGENERATION.COM'; Aronowitz, Alan; 'Ken.Bowen@rbcds.com'
Cc:	Robert Pickel; Ruth Ainslie; Emily Jelich; Scott Marra; Katia d'Hulster; 'Christophe.Chassard@rwetrading.com'; Stacy Carey
Subject:	ISDA North American Energy and Developing Products Committee Meet	ing- July 27, 2001 --11:30 a.m.(EST)/10:30 a.m.(Central)

We would like to invite you to participate in a meeting of the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association's North American Energy and Developing
Products Committee on Friday, July 27, 2001 at 11:30 a.m. (New York)/10:30
a.m. (Houston).
ISDA's Energy and Developing Products Committee, Chaired by Mark Haedicke,
General Counsel of Enron Capital and Trade Resources Corp., focuses on
facilitating and addressing issues ranging from documentation to market
practice related to the prudent development of the range of commodity
derivatives transactions. To that end, we plan to discuss items on the
following agenda:

 <<Agenda - July 27.doc>>

This will be a video conference meeting held at the offices of Goldman Sachs
in New York (1 NY Plaza, 37th Floor, Room 37G) and in Houston (1000
Louisiana Street, Suite 550, Room 5G).  You may also participate by calling
into the meeting on the following phone numbers:  United States:
1-877-718-6588; International:  212-902-0992.  The passcode is:  20952.

Please RSVP via e-mail to Scott Marra: smarra@isda.org.  We would appreciate
knowing if you will attend the Houston location, New York location or if you
will be calling-in by phone.

Additionally, as ISDA is currently updating its database, we apologize if we
have inadvertently omitted anyone from the list.  Please let me know if
there are other ISDA members or members of your institution who should also
receive an invitation to this meeting.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions.
Thank you.

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - Agenda - July 27.doc << File: Agenda - July 27.doc >>