Post Date: December 12, 2000
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-188 NWP Short Term Firm Availability

Notice Text:
All Shippers Notification:? 01-188??? Dated : December 12, 2000

*** REMINDER ***

NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S
NOTICE OF AVAILABLE AND POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE FIRM TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY1)

??????????????????????????????????????????????? Total??? Available
Pkg? Receipt Point2)????????? Delivery Point2)?????????? Dth/d?????????
Date3)??

A??? Sumas??????????????????? Puget(Canyon)??????????????????? 16,000????????
02/01/01 9)

B??? Sumas??????????????????? Puget(Canyon)?????????????????????
7,000???????? 01/01/01 9)

C??? Sumas??????????????????? Puget(Canyon)?????????????????????
5,000????????? 01/01/01 10)

D??? Sumas????? ??????????????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.?????? 9,772?????????
02/01/01 10)

E??? Sumas(1160)????????? Kemmerer???????????????????????????? 2,750?????????
01/01/01 9)
???? Ignacio Plant(1590)

F??? Sumas(2,390)???????? Monticello(330)????????????????????? 6,016?????????
01/01/01 9)
???? Ignacio(3,626)????????? Rio Algom(300)
?????????????????????????????????????? Moab#2(1,861)
?????????????????????????????????????? Moab(2,283)
?????????????????????????????????????? Arches National Park(17)
?????????????????????????????????????? Vernal(653)
?????????????????????????????????????? Dutch John(125)
?????????????????????????????????????? Redwash(447)

**********************************************************************
Jackson Prairie Receipt Point Capacity
Available for TF-1 or TF-2 Service as specified below

G??? Jackson Prairie??? SIPI????????????????????????????? 47,341?? NOW 5)8)
???? (55,715)??????????????????? Lynden??????????????????????????? 592?????
?????????????????????????????????????? Lawrence????????????????????????
81??????
?????????????????????????????????????? ACME????????????????????????????????
68??????
?????????????????????????????????????? Mt. Vernon????????????????????
115?????
?????????????????????????????????????? Sedro/Woolley??????????? 3,988???
?????????????????????????????????????? LDS Church??????????????????? 133
?????????????????????????????????????? Granite Falls??????????????? 1,536???
?????????????????????????????????????? Machias?????????????????????? 1,840???
?????????????????????????????????????? Snohomish?????????????????????
21??????

H??? Jackson Prairie??? Echo Lake??????????????????????? 33?????? NOW 5)8)
???? (7,530)????????????????????? Duval/Cottage Lake????? 183????
?????????????????????????????????????? Redmond??????????????????? 3,293??
?????????????????????????????????????? May Valley?????????????????????
300????
?????????????????????????????????????? Lake Francis?????????????? 2,808??
?????????????????????????????????????? Covington????????????????????? 263????
?????????????????????????????????????? Black Diamond????????????? 450????
?????????????????????????????????????? Enumclaw????????????????????? 200????

I??? Jackson Prairie????? Sedro/Woolley?????????? 8,300??? 05/01/01 5)10)

J?? Jackson Prairie????? South Lake???????????? 35,500?? NOW 6)
??
K?? Jackson Prairie????? Idaho State Pen.?????? 1,735??? NOW 6)

L?? Jackson Prairie????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.? 98,069?? NOW 6)

M? Jackson Prairie????? Shute Creek???????????? 7,688??? NOW 6)

N?? Jackson Prairie????? Pocatello?????????????????? 1,198??? NOW 6)

O?? Starr Road?????????????? Inland Paper??????????????? 830????? NOW 8)

P?? Stanfield????????????????? Stanfield??????????????????? 3,681??? 01/01/01
9)

Q?? Stanfield????????????????? Stanfield?????????????????? 14,490?? 04/01/02
10)

R?? Shute Creek??????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 25,000?? NOW

S?? Shute Creek??????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 25,000?? 01/01/01 9)

T?? Shute Creek??????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 10,000?? 01/01/01 10)

U?? Shute Creek??????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 15,000?? 11/01/01 9)

V?? Opal Plant??????????????? Western Mkt Center????? 90,000??? 04/01/01 9)

W?? Painter??????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)???????? 8,351??? NOW 8)

X?? Painter???????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)??????? 35,000?? 01/01/01
9)

Y??? Western Mkt Center?????? Crossover 16-Questar?? 50,415?? 01/01/01 7) 9)

Z??? Western Mkt Center?????? Clay Basin?????????????????????????? 4,585???
NOW 7) 8)

AA?? Crossover 16???????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????? 23,152??? NOW
7) 8)

BB?? Crossover 16????????????????? Clay Basin?????????????????????????
10,000?? NOW 7) 9)

CC?? Crossover 16???????????????? Clay Basin??????????????????????????
17,263?? NOW 7)

DD?? Green Rvr/McKinn-CIG? Clay Basin?????????????????????????? 23,152?? NOW
7) 8)

EE?? Clay Basin???????????????????????? Chevron Rangely(6093)???? 7,488???
03/01/01 9)
?????????????????????????????????????????????????? Vernal (1395)

FF?? Clay Basin???????????????????????? Redwash/Questar???????????? 19,240??
03/01/01 7) 9)

GG?? Clay Basin???????????????????????
Rifle?????????????????????????????????????? 7,770??? NOW 7) 8)

HH?? Clay Basin???????????????????????
Rifle??????????????????????????????????????? 1,850??? 01/01/01 7) 10)

II?? Clay Basin????????????????????????? American Soda Ash????????????
1,140??? NOW 7) 8)

JJ?? Jensen (Ut Gas Svc)????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????? 316???
NOW

KK?? Redwash/Chevron??????? Green River-CIG??????????????????? 1,850??? NOW
8)

LL?? Redwash/QPC???????????????
Rifle????????????????????????????????????????? 1,050??? NOW 7) 8)
????
MM?? Greasewood??????????????? Clay Basin??????????????????????????????
2,765??? NOW 8)

NN?? Piceance Quick Cycle?? Green River-CIG??????????????????? 1,005??? NOW

OO?? Barrett???????????????????????????? Kern
River????????????????????????????? 4,097??? 03/01/01 9)
?
PP?? Barrett????????????????????????????? Green River-CIG??????????????????
6,460??? NOW 8)

QQ?? North Douglas??????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????? 3,178???
NOW

RR?? Sand Springs?????????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)???? 23,148???
01/01/01-
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????? 03/31/01 4)

SS?? Sand Springs????????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)?????? 23,148??
11/01/01 4,10)

TT?? West Douglas???????????????? Clay Basin??????????????????????????????
2,354?? NOW 8)

UU?? Calf Canyon(410)??????????? Kern River?????????????????????????????????
703??? 01/01/01 9)
???? Foundation Crk.(293)

VV?? Lisbon??????????????????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????
2,600??? NOW

WW?? Grand Valley??????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????
1,137??? NOW

XX?? Grand Gas????????????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????
1,000??? NOW

YY?? Ignacio Plant????????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????
5,000??? 01/01/01 9)

ZZ?? Ignacio Plant????????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????
1,424??? NOW 8)

AAA? Ignacio Plant??????????????? Green River-CIG????????????????????
11,177?? NOW

BBB?? Ignacio Plant??????????????? Grand Junction???????????????????????
4,000??? 01/01/01 9)

CCC?? Ignacio Plant?????????????? Grand Junction???????????????????????
4,310??? NOW 8)

DDD?? Ignacio Plant??????????????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG)??????? 50,000?? NOW
8)

EEE?? Blanco Hub-TW??????????? Green River-CIG????????????????????? 25,000??
01/01/01 9)

FFF?? Blanco Hub-TW??????????? Green River-CIG????????????????????? 15,000??
01/01/01 10)

GGG?? Blanco Hub-TW????????? Green River-CIG????????????????????? 35,563??
NOW

************************************************************************

1) This notification supercedes all previous Notices of Available and
???? Potentially Available Capacity and is subject to change at any time.

2) Other receipt and delivery points utilizing the described
??? transportation corridor may be available.

3)? Potential Availability date for the Capacity.

4)? Contracts shall include the following subordinate scheduling
??? provision if the requested term extends into a critical operational
??? period:

To the extent Shipper's nominated volumes are not scheduled solely
due to Shipper's subordinate scheduling priorities set forth below,
the monthly base reservation charge will be discounted to $0.00 per
Dth for that quantity only.

Section 14.1(c)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights through any mainline constraint
from the Sand Springs receipt point to the Ignacio Bondad (or
LaPlata-TW) delivery point(s) to have a scheduling priority which
will be subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm shipper
with primary corridor rights that encompass and extend beyond the
Sand Springs to Ignacio Bondad (or LaPlata-TW) corridor.

5) Available for TF-1 or TF-2 transportation service.? TF-2 service
will not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate
for TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to requester's
designated storage contract or storage ownership right. TF-2 service shall
include the following subordinate scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any northflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

6) Available for TF-2 transportation service only. TF-2 service will
not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate for??? TF-2
service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to requester's
designated storage contract or storage ownership right.? TF-2 service
shall include the following subordinate scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any southflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

7) Capacity is not to exceed a one month primary term with evergreen
language.? Any offers with terms greater than one month will need to be
evaluated for possible seasonal flow conditions that may restrict the
available capacity beyond a one month term.

8) This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
This capacity can be made available by providing one business day??? written
termination notification to the current holder of the??????? capacity.

9) This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
This capacity can be made available by providing ten business days
written termination notification to the current holder of the capacity.

10) This capacity is currently under contract and does not contain an
evergreen clause.

11) This capacity is "mitigated" capacity and will not contain an
evergreen clause.

12) This capacity is available only for the term offered.? No evergreen
clause available.?

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING AVAILABLE AND
POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE
TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

To request Potentially Available Transportation Capacity available on the
first
day of January 2001, Shipper must submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of
the
Letter Agreement provided below.? This Letter Agreement must be received by
Northwest no later than 2:00 pm Central Time on December 13, 2000.? Northwest
will accept or reject the Prearranged Offer by no later than the end of of
the
gas day on December 14, 2000. If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable,
Northwest
will provide a 10-day termination notice to the current holder of the
Capacity,
post the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no later than two
business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise specified in this
posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the procedure set
forth
in Northwest's tariff.

To request the Potentially Available Transportation Capacity with the? one
business day termination provisions as indicated by footnote "8)",? Shipper
must
submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter Agreement provided
below.
Upon receipt of this Letter Agreement Northwest will either accept or reject
the
Prearranged Offer within 24-hours. If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable,
Northwest will provide the one business day termination notice to the current
holder of the Capacity, post the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the
capacity no later than two business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless
otherwise specified in this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded
pursuant
to the procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff.

To request Available Transportation Capacity, Shipper must immediately submit
a
Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter Agreement provided below.?
Northwest
will accept or reject the Prearranged Offer within two (2) business days of
receipt of the prearranged offer.? If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable,
Northwest will post the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no
later than two business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise
specified in this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the
procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff. Northwest has the right to re-post
Available capacity for bid ith or without prearranged offers.

??????? _________________(Date)

____________________________ (Company Name)
____________________________ (Company Address)
____________________________ (City, State, Zip)

VIA FACSIMILE - (801) 584-7076

Northwest Pipeline Corporation
c/o Williams Gas Pipelines - West
Attn: Candace C.? Karpakis
295 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84158

Re:???? Prearranged Offer for Available or Potentially Available
Transportation
Capacity on Williams' Northwest Pipeline Transmission System

Dear Candace:

_______________________ ("Shipper") submits the following bid for available
or
potentially available transportation capacity ("Capacity") designated as
package
_____ on Northwest Pipeline Corporation's ("Northwest") "Notice of Available
or
Potentially Available Firm Transportation Capacity" dated December 12, 2000.
Shipper recognizes and agrees that the Capacity will be subject to the
Special
Conditions set forth in this posting.? Shipper's request? is?? or?? is not
(circle one) contingent upon confirmation that its offered discount rate
provides use of receipt/delivery points outside the receipt/delivery point
corridor specified in the package.? If maximum rate is offered, this
provision
does not apply.? Shipper understands that its prearranged offer is subject to
the Special Conditions described below.

Shipper understands that Northwest will post the prearranged details of this
offer for such Capacity for bidding and Shipper will have the right to match
the
highest bid value upon close of the bid process.? Northwest will not disclose
the identity of the prearranged bidder in such posting.

Service Type:?????????? TF-1 Large Customer

Contract Demand(Dth/d): ____________________

Receipt Point(s)(if other than those posted for the designated package of
capacity)????????????????????????? ____________________
Delivery Point(s)(if other than those posted for the designated package of
capacity)??????????????????????????????? ____________________
Daily Reservation Rate: $_______/Dth? (applicable surcharges, volumetric
charge
& fuel are additive)

Term:______________________________to___________________________________

Evergreen Requested (circle one):?????? Yes?? or???? No

Identity of any affiliate of Northwest involved in Shipper's transaction:
Indicate "None" or "Name the Affiliate":
_________________________________________________

Northwest's acceptance of Shipper's prearranged offer for the Capacity will
constitute a binding agreement between Northwest and Shipper.? Shipper shall
be
awarded the Capacity at the terms agreed upon in this Letter Agreement if no
bids are received with a greater economic value for such Capacity during the
bid
process. If Shipper elects to match a bid with a greater economic value, it
shall be awarded the Capacity according to the terms of the matched bid.
Shipper
agrees to electronically execute a service agreement on Northwest's
Electronic
Bulletin Board which confirms the terms of the final accepted transaction.

If you have questions or comments regarding the above referenced information,
please contact __________________________ at ______________________
Phone Number) ______________________(Fax Number).

Sincerely,

______________________________???????????????? (Name)
______________________________???????????????? (Title)

(Accepted? /? Rejected) by Northwest:

Date: _______________?? Name: ________________________________

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(For Prearranged Offer Agreement)

If the prearranged offer for the Capacity is accepted at a discount rate
which
provides for the use of receipt/delivery points outside the specified
receipt/delivery point corridor for the Capacity, the accepted prearranged
offered discount rate shall apply no matter which receipt and delivery points
are utilized by Shipper, or any temporary replacement Shipper, under capacity
release transactions, including segmented releases.? If the accepted
prearranged
offered discount rate for the Capacity does not provide for use of
eceipt/delivery points outside the specified receipt/delivery point corridor
for
the Capacity, the accepted prearranged offered discount rate shall apply to
Shipper, or any temporary replacement Shipper, only to the extent that both
Shipper and any temporary replacement Shipper utilize receipt points within
their respective primary firm receipt/delivery point to primary firm delivery
point corridors, otherwise, Shipper will be liable for Northwest's maximum
tariff rates.

If you are interested in discussing any of the Available or Potentially
Available Capacity, please call Candace Karpakis at (801) 584-6996 (work) or
at
(801) 971-5983 (cellular).

Word:? F:\NWP Capacity Postings\2000 All Shipper Notices\01-188 12-12-2000??


jmf
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 03:23
PM ---------------------------
From: Stewart Rosman on 10/20/2000 10:49 AM
To: John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transalta Service Summary

John here is a brief summary of a service transaction which we have with
Transalta:

Enron serves as schedule coordinator for Transalta for all SC-SC trades and
exports on a day ahead basis.  The exports are exposed to transmission cuts
and could affect real time.  All costs are passed through to Transalta so it
is key we record when energy does not flow to Victorville Lugo.  Perhaps to
help record what activity gets done on a daily basis Les or myself should
record in Lotus Notes the transactions that are exported.  Let me know if
that will solve any confusion.  Thanks.

Stewart

PS I need your real time service numbers for Aug, Sept


I just spoke to the insurance company.  They are going to cancel and prorate
my policy and work with the Kuo's to issue a new policy.


Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST).

Last Year      - 97
Last Week      + 7

Thank You,
Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Is he availabe tomorrow?

Once you get a picture of availability (maybe you have it all ready), ask
Sheila what she wants to do. She may want to re-schedule for tomorrow morning.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 11:06 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GE Meeting Today

Scott Dieball isn't available today.  Is he key, or should we try for
tomorrow?  I didn't know how urgent the meeting was.


As most of you know, NRG's proposed purchase of two coal plants in Conneticut (UI's territory) was recently cancelled due to regulatory issues at FERC.   The purchase and sale transaction between Wisvest and NRG was originally entered into almost two years ago.   The proposed purchase price of $350 million for 1000 MW of coal was a "bargain price" at the time due to environmental risks that are specific to the state of CT.

Over the past 2-3 years, the State of Conneticut has threatened to have these coal plants shut down due to pollution issues and Wisvest was concerned enough about this risk that they "puked" the plants to NRG for $350/kW in early 2000.   At a minimum, it is expected that $100-150/kW of SCR and/or scrubbers will be required at these facilities to appease the CT regulatory bodies.

My strong view is that, as a practical matter, the plants cannot be shut down or the lights would go out in CT.   The area where the plants are located is quite possibly the most congested area in the entire Eastern Interconnect.   The load pocket is significantly short MW and transmission import capability is inadequate to serve the load in this area.   In a true "locational marginal price" environment, the prices would likely be similar to Zone J in New York   Currently, pricing in NEPOOL is generally socialized with congestion costs spread equally to all loads, regardless of who causes the congestion.

In the recently proposed "single NE RTO" model, it is about 80% certain that the PJM "locational marginal price" market model will be implemented sometime between mid-2003 and mid-2004.   At that point in time, consumers in the congested areas of NEPOOL (in-city Boston and CT) will be exposed to higher energy prices, while consumers in Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island should see lower prices.

Given the facts above, coupled with traditional asset companies too long to show good bids for incremental assets, I think EWS should pursue discussions with Wisvest immediately and attempt to buy these coal plants at what could be extremely favorable economics relative to our forward curve in NEPOOL and our bullish view for relative pricing at the asset "node".

If we could buy these plants for approx $250/kW with $150/kW of environmental upgrades, the resulting "all-in" (depr, fixed & variable O&M, fuel costs, NOx, SO2, capital reserve, interest) 7x24 plant cost would be approx. $34-36/Mwh.    This is lower than our energy only socialized NEPOOL curve.   Additional upside is derived from positive basis, ICAP, ancillary services, emissions allowances, and long term requirements sales to LSE's.

Lavo and Louise - This could be the "Alberta PPA" for 2002.   Lots of "hair" but lots of upside.

Any thoughts?


Attached please find a follow up to today's Natural Gas market analysis.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 10-23-01 Nat Gas intraday update.doc


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/23/2001>, published as of 10/23/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 5)

Publisher's Notes:

FINAL


---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
03:17 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
02/16/2001 03:26 PM
To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Firmness Codes

Here is the list of Firmness types from Enpower, which I promised to get for
you so that we can review to see if they are up to date for the EEI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
03:25 PM ---------------------------
From: Nikolay Kraltchev/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/16/2001 03:15 PM
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Firmness Codes

Hi Rhonda!

This is the list I found.

Please let me know if something is missing.

Thanks!
Nikolay


===================================================

JoC Online Daily E-mail Newsletter
Friday Edition
October 26, 2001
Armed Forces Day (Benin)
www.joc.com

===================================================

Take the Daily Quiz, sponsored by APL.

Which country exported the most goods in terms of
value to Pakistan in 2000?

Click on
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50PuU0AU

===================================================

TODAY'S TOP HEADLINES:

* Bailout helps Northwest into black
* Suspected hijacker discovered in container
* Canada to pre-clear U.S. goods
* Hong Kong hints at opens skies
* Port security an all-hands effort: CG official
* DOT sets procedures for airlines payments
* Stolt, others form chem tanker pool
* S&P affirms PSA rating
* Vastera loss widens, but revenue soars
* Massport director resigns
* Pakistan presses insurers to drop war-risk surcharge
* Brazil will write off Santos port debt
* ValuShip names Norton Lilly agent
* Europe View: Railways still on the dole
* JoC Week Special Report: Cargo security

===================================================

ADVERTISE IN THE ONLY MEDIUM THAT IS SPECIFIC TO
YOUR INDUSTRY!
Subscribers rely on the Transportation Telephone
Tickler as the only source to find the geographic
and alphabetical listings on over 20,000 companies.
The deadline to advertise in the National Edition
is November 30th.  The advertising benefits are
endless. Call (800) 222-0356 or visit
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50QfI0A3
for more information. Mention Code ENL1.

===================================================

BAILOUT HELPS NORTHWEST INTO BLACK
The airline posted a profit of $19 million in the
third quarter, thanks to $249 million in aid.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRd0AC

SUSPECTED HIJACKER DISCOVERED IN CONTAINER
Italian authorities arrested a stowaway in a
container furnished with a bed, toilet and
electronic gear.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRe0AD

CANADA TO PRE-CLEAR U.S. GOODS '
Electronic processing will replace paper records
and inspections for low-risk goods entering at
land border crossings.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRf0AE

HONG KONG HINTS AT OPENS SKIES
In a reversal of long-standing policy, Hong Kong
has agreed in principle to open up its aviation market.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRg0AF

PORT SECURITY AN ALL-HANDS EFFORT: CG OFFICIAL
A Coast Guard official said that port security will
be the responsibility of all people involved in the
port environment.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRh0AG

DOT SETS PROCEDURES FOR AIRLINES PAYMENTS
The U.S. Department of Transportation has announced
procedures for air carriers to use in applying for
the additional compensation available under a program
to compensate airlines for their losses resulting
from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRi0AH

STOLT, OTHERS FORM CHEM TANKER POOL
The joint venture would combine European chemical tanker
coastal fleets.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRj0AI

S&P AFFIRMS PSA RATING
The agency said the terminal operator's long-term
outlook is stable despite reports that Evergreen
Marine Corp. would shift its transshipment hub from
Singapore to Malaysia.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRk0AJ

==================ADVERTISEMENT====================

2-day seminar opportunity with low in-season rates
sponsored by National Cargo Security Council and DSI
Security, November 14-16, Radisson Mart Plaza, Miami,
FL. During the recent horrific times, one of the many
questions that has surfaced is "Taking Responsibility".
Over 20 speakers on such subjects as "Who Is Responsible
In Your Company," "Interfacing with Law Enforcement,"
"Reducing Loss Exposure," and many other important
cargo security topics will be presented. Pending
Senate port security bill will be examined in detail.
Exhibit hall included. Reasonable registration fee
of only $199. Contact NCSC at
 ncsc@cargosecurity.com.

===================================================

VASTERA LOSS WIDENS, BUT REVENUE SOARS
The cross-border trade management software and
services company reported a third-quarter net loss
 of $9.9 million.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRl0AK

MASSPORT DIRECTOR RESIGNS
Virginia Buckingham resigned just weeks after
hijackers at the agency's Logan International Airport
boarded two planes that crashed into the World Trade Center.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRm0AL

PAKISTAN PRESSES INSURERS TO DROP WAR-RISK SURCHARGE
The government is offering for pay for damage to
ships or cargo calling at its ports as an incentive
for insurers to withdraw war-risk surcharges.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRn0AM

BRAZIL WILL WRITE OFF SANTOS PORT DEBT
The Port's management company owes $130 million.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRo0AN

VALUSHIP NAMES NORTON LILLY AGENT
The planned start-up of new container services between
the U.S. West Coast and Europe, said it has appointed
Norton Lilly International as its general agent for
North America.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RRp0AO

...and exclusively in JoC ONLINE
EUROPE VIEW by Bruce Barnard
RAILWAYS STILL ON THE DOLE
While airlines bid adieu to state subsidies, governments
continue to protect rail operators.
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RQE0Ae

...and only in JoC WEEK
SPECIAL REPORT: CARGO SECURITY
No quick answers for spotty
cargo security...changes have made the Senate's
proposed Port and Maritime Security Act tough to
track...tighter air cargo rules can reduce terrorist
threats, but not eliminate them...What's the future
of ocean cargo documentation?
To subscribe, visit
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50RHs0AH

===================================================

SUBSCRIBE to JoC WEEK and get access to JoC ONLINE
Go to
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50PuU0AU
for complete coverage of international trade and logistics.

===================================================

TO SPONSOR THE E-NEWSLETTER OR ADVERTISE IN JoC ONLINE
Call Tammarra Askew at 973-848-7077 or e-mail: taskew@joc.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FEEDBACK

E-mail: editor@joc.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TO UNSUBSCRIBE

unsubscribe_joc@news.joc.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forward To An Associate
If you haven't already done so, please forward this
newsletter to one or two of your business associates.

Reading A Forwarded Copy of This E-Mail?
Now you can receive you own daily e-mail newsletter
with a summary of the day's top stories delivered
right to your own e-mail in-box.  To subscribe,
simply click on
http://news.joc.com/cgi-bin7/flo?y=eDWI0BejkZ0n50QEo0A8

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CUSTOMER SERVICE

Phone: (800) 331-1341
E-mail: customersvs@joc.com

   JoC ONLINE
Phone: 973-848-7000
Fax:   973-848-7016
Mail:  JoC Online
       33 Washington Street
       13th Flr.
       Newark, NJ 07102-3107

   Copyright 2001 The Journal of Commerce Group


The DC Circuit Court of Appeals has extended the date for states and sources
to comply with the EPA's NOx SIP Call regulation to May 2004, from the
original May 2003 date.

Background

Back in May 1999, a federal Court stayed the NOx SIP submittal deadline for
States, pending the final outcome of the NOx SIP litigation.   After the DC
Circuit Court decided the case in March 2000, EPA asked the court to lift the
stay on the NOx SIP submittal for States and give the states the same amount
of time they would have had to submit their SIPs, had the stay not been
imposed in the first place.   Industry sources opposed lifting the stay, and
also asked the court to move the complaince deadline back a year, due to the
delays caused by the litigation.

The Court lifted the stay on June 22, 2000, but was silent on the issue of
the compliance deadline.  States are now required to develop their "State
Implementation Plans" (SIPs) by October 31, 2000.

Yesterday, the Court decided that sources should have until May 2004 to
comply, giving sources an extra year to prepare for the new regulatory regime.

Remaining Questions

With the previous 2003 compliance deadline, the NOx SIP Call regulations were
on the same time schedule as the Section 126 petitions, which were approved
by EPA (though a separate regulatory process -- a nearly-identical fallback
to the NOx SIP call) for many of the same sources and states as the NOx SIP
Call.   The Section 126 Rule is going to be litigated starting this coming
November, but the Court has not yet issued a stay of those regulation, nor
has it delayed the compliance deadline to 2003.   Unless the Court places a
stay on the 126 Rule and delays the compliance deadline to 2004, sources
could still be required to make substantial NOx reductions starting in May
2003.   We expect the Courts to resolve this issue sometime before the 126
litigation commences in early November.

Enron Activities

SIPs are being developed by the states, with a deadline of October 31, so
Environmental Strategies will be spending the next few months working to
ensure that the rules that are crafted in the states provide the most
favorable treatment possible for our assets while providing a competitive
advantage to our traders.   While the delay could benefit some Enron assets
that need to comply with the regulations, it could also benefit our
competitors, who have another year to defer environmental compliance
decisions that would likely increase their costs and create other
disadvantages for them.

We will keep you posted with any developments as they occur.

Jeff Keeler  (202) 466-9157
Mary Schoen (713) 345-7422


Use this one:

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/05/2001 12:25 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ABB acknowledgement letter

This will need to be signed by ABB today.  I would guess 3 originals.

Ben, I suggest we let Kathleen coordinate the assembly of the docs to be
signed.

Kay


Any news on this data?

-Eric


713 304 8716

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 01/23/2001 11:03:41 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: I'm here!

   Why don't I call you after I ask Michael?  I don't know what he has
in mind for entertainment.  Also, what is your cell phone number in case I
can't reach you at work?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:02 AM
To: cbrashear@velaw.com
Subject: I'm here!

My trip cancelled, so I'm around.  I can pick Michael up at your place if
this is easier for you.

Kay
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Jeff,
Ellen Su and I are working on it for today.
Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:47 PM
To:	Price, Brent A.
Cc:	Hickerson, Gary; Lawyer, Larry; Glover, Sheila
Subject:	RE: Funds to be wired today

Thank you guys.  In addition, what about moving all financial futures to fimat today, where we have a $20 million line?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Brent A.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	Lawyer, Larry; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Mcconnell, Mike
Subject:	FW: Funds to be wired today

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Price, Brent A.
Subject:	FW: Funds to be wired today

fyi...sg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Perkins, Mary; Round, Samuel
Cc:	Hickerson, Gary; Brogan, Theresa T.
Subject:	Funds to be wired today

Mary and Sam,

The attached schedule details the funds of $124.7 million to be received today from Brokerage accounts.
$85 million is being received from our funds and $40 million from other entities.  Everyone was very cooperative in getting this done this morning.
Wiring instructions have been send to the Brokers for the full $124.7 million.

We have added the Wiring instructions and exact amounts to the schedule.

 << File: FundingOverview102501.xls >>


<<2RZ502!.DOC>>  <<2rz602!.DOC>>  <<2rz802!.DOC>>

Kay:

We have enclosed the most recent drafts of the following "prototype"
documents:

1.  Letter Agreement for the turbine transaction;
2.  Letter Agreement for the transformer transaction
3.  Limited Liability Company Agreement fur the turbine/transformer
transaction.

These documents were last revised on 12/15/2000.  Since that time, we made a
number of changes to the letter agreement in the InterGen transaction that
you might also wish to consider for the prototype.  These items include (i)
provisions for submission and approval of the facility agreement, (ii)
requirement that the entire purchase price be funded into escrow upon
approval of the facility agreement, (iii) pro-ration of property taxes, (iv)
requirement for liability insurance through date of commercial operation,
and (v) tweaks in the termination language that would provide a right to
terminate, rather than automatic termination.  Let me know if we can be of
any assistance.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 129569v2
  129570v2
  129572v2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2RZ502!.DOC
 - 2rz602!.DOC
 - 2rz802!.DOC


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain
these outages.

In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable
you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 091801R.xls
 - 091801.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


I give all void requests to Claudette Danials.  She enters all voids and stop
payments for the AP department now.  We cannot void MSA checks in SAP.  What
we do is a journal entry to reverse the original expense (converted to SAP
coding) and outstanding checks.  Lupe and the Wire Team do enter their own
voids when it is a wire, but since this one was a check, Claudette should
have it.  I do remember seeing the Goldman Sachs void request and I discussed
it with Lien Nguyen on our wire team before she gave it to Claudette.

Ben

Stephen Wolfe @ ECT

09/06/2000 06:30 PM
To: Ben Gwaltney/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kortney Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lupe Spencer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Check to be Reversed

Ben,

As per a voicemail I left you today, one of the Enron Global Markets Teams
(Global Risk Markets) is awaiting the reversal of a check (to Goldman Sachs)
that was wired out instead.  Kortney Brown and Dana Davis had worked with you
and Lupy Spencer on this before.  Last anyone heard, it had made it to your
desk.

I was checking to see if that was the case and if there would be any
difficulty in voiding a legacy MSA check on the new SAP system.  Please let
me know what you find or if you need any further information.

Stephen


<<_HMW01_.DOC>>  <<Titan-Schaeffer Optionredline.DOC>>

Kay: Per your request, attached hereto please find the blacklined
Titan-Schaffer Option with those blacklined changes per your email yesterday
and sent to Mr. Freehill today for his review.  I have also attached the
coverletter sent to Mr. Freehill for your files.  Please feel free to call
with any questions or comments.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

I appreciate the heads up -  I'll try to chase down the fax (it hasn't been
delivered yet).  Can you email me the blacklines just in case?

Thanks,

Kay

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - _HMW01_.DOC
 - Titan-Schaeffer Optionredline.DOC


Attached is a revised version of the capacity release letter, reflecting a comment from Michelle.


Carol Phillabaum
567 Palisade Ave
Teaneck, NJ 07666
cphillabaum@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from
selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds,
such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the
company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide
relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their
energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of
California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's
employees were financially devastated when the company declared
bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made
an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a
result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their
basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron
stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep
buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair
the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Carol Phillabaum


I think it would be useful to get in touch with the HR leadership and review what is being done and get their ideas on what they think should be done.  More than anything I want the organization to know who to go to with their ideas and cut down on the noise level and the perception that we aren't doing anything.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Donovan, Bill; Brindle, John
Cc:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Pieper, Kalen; Smith, Gary; Barnard, Marla
Subject:	Security Concerns

Steve

I and my fellow HR VP's are volunteering on Monday to spend the first 2 hours of our day checking id's and that security pass pictures match individuals using them before letting them in the building. In fact, I am planning to order some peaked caps and t-shirts with SECURITY emblazened on them today. Robert and I are also going to Best Buy tomorrow to pick up a couple of those hand held metal detector wands to waive around..........................I could go on.

The security stinks, our employees do not feel comforted and we need to do something about it. I am prepared to do it myself!

David
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pieper, Kalen
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 2:40 PM
To:	Krueger, Johanna; Oxley, David; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Gray, Judy; Lopez, Leasa; O'Callaghan, Mickey
Subject:	Re: Concerns

Johanna,

These are excellent ideas.   David/Robert, can we incorporate into our overall approach?

Johanna Krueger
09/21/2001 10:26 AM
To:	Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Mickey O'Callaghan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Concerns

Good Morning Kalen--

Since the attack on America, last week, 9/11/01--Life as we know it will never be the same.  Although, as a nation, ( individuals) we are trying to recover & put the pieces back, we know the journey ahead will be hard ( especially after what Bush discussed last night).  I bring this up for several reasons; as an American & an Enron employee.  After talking w/ Enron employees, about terrorists attacks, possible cell groups in our own back yard--we are fearful--this is an understatement.  However, we know, as employees, the importance of getting back to the work, Enron is paying us to do.  How do we balance the two?  I have some ideas I have shared with Leasa & Judy--I'd like to suggest them to you, as I feel they are steps we can put into place to help our Enron employees feel safe.

1)Let's have an evacuation drill
2) On your floor know where the nearest stairwell (s) are located
3) Someone assigned to a handicapped employee--in the event of an evacuation--this person would ensure they get out safely
4) Update floor/ fire warden--who are they?  Leasa told me that the one on our floor is from 1998
5) Have one or two contacts in each group that would be responsible for making sure everyone knew what was happening in the event of an evacuation ( people come in @ different times etc...)
6) Vent/ talk meetings w/ managers over lunch ( see paragraph #2 for explanation)

Also, I do not think it is unreasonable to think some of our employees are suffering from ( or will suffer from) Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome! I propose that managers/ leaders of groups hold a "vent/ talk" meeting--over lunch--where employees can feel free to talk about their concerns, fears, anger etc..--It is so important that we do this.  If not some of the repercussions may be people resigning -for fear of working downtown/ in a high-rise etc...( Judy & I talked about this).

I feel this is an opportunity for HR to really make a difference/ contribute/ & have a strong impact, in assuring our employees we are taking active measures to ensure their safety & want to address their feelings.    I'd like to know what your thoughts are on this?  If you'd like to discuss the further, I'd welcome the opportunity.

Thank you for your time.

Johanna

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Good  Morning,
?
I have attached a  press release that may be of interest to you.
?
If you have any  questions regarding it, or if we can be of assistance in any
other way, please  call me directly at 972-245-8300.
?
Thanks and best  regards,
Katheryn  Stalker

?

Risk  Limited Corporation

Box 612666?? Dallas, Texas 75261?? USA??? Tel:  972.245.8300?? Fax:
972.245.8318???  www.RiskLimited.com
 - Press Release Dr. Rafael Campo 5-2-01.doc


PROCESSING

None

TENDERED

02-062	Questar	Eff 1/1/02		Interconnect & Operating K	  	EXECUTED

26471	PPL		Eff RR In-Service	20,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27642	Calpine	Eff RR In-Service	40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27803	BP		1/1/03-12/31/04	25,000/d	Blmfld to Needles	Tendered 1/28

27821	Cinergy	2/1-2/28/02		5,000/d	Cen Pool to Topock	Negotiating 2/1

27834	WGR		4/1/02-10/31/02	5,000/d	WTx Pl to PG&E Topk	EXECUTED

27835	WGR		11/02 - 12/03		10,000/d	WTx Pl to Socal	EXECUTED


...because I'm good enough, I'm smart enough and dog-gonnit people like me.

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Stadler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Congratulations

All,

Thanks for all your help the other week ... the article in the e-mail below
highlights the effect on Enron!!!!

RZ

---------------------- Forwarded by Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2000 12:31
PM ---------------------------

Andrew Champion
03/27/2000 12:20 PM
To: Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Congratulations

We passed... check out this article - Ramesh pointed it out to me:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000323/sc.html

"Moody's raises Enron Corp long-term debt..."

"...Stress testing and VAR calculations in the Wholesale business are
consistent on a relative scale with other commodities trading firms..."


I am not sure it solves matters.  Stikemans opinion points out:

1.  as I indicated this morning, "money" means actual currency - notes and
coins - not funds transferred by wire into an account, which would likely be
treated as an "intangible" resulting in the various requirements/concerns I
pointed to this morning regarding perfection by registration;

2.  although, in their view, the validity of the transfer approach would be
recognized by a court (in Ontario at least), given that the intention of the
Transfer Annex is to provide security for contingent obligations under the
Master Agreement and the lack of relevant case law, there is a material risk
that the Court would nonetheless characterize the transfer as a security
interest subject to the requirements for perfection.

With our present understanding, in the absence of any definitive case law,
and without an unequivocal opinion we can rely on, I am not sure we can rely
on the transfer approach to solve the problem, particularly with high volume
counterparties who likely are going to create the largest exposures.

Peter.

   Carol St Clair                03/20/2001 09:19 AM

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cash Collateral In Canada

Peter:
Thanks for responding and sorry about you having to repeat this again as I
was not aware of your previous discussions.  In Stikeman's November 2000 ISDA
Collateral Opinion, they suggest as an alternative course of action to modify
the Credit Support Annex to create a debtor/creditor relationship between the
parties and to provide for an outright transfer of cash instead of a pledge.
Do you have any thoughts on this?  Is this an alternative that we should
consider implementing with some of our more persistent high volume
counterparties who are giving us a hard time about not being able to post
cash collateral to us?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Peter Keohane
	03/20/2001 09:58 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Cash Collateral In Canada

In the past few weeks, I have discussed this issue with Brent H., Mark T.
Chris G. and Mary C.  Under the PPSA jurisdictions in Canada, which includes
Alberta and Ontario among others, cash held on deposit as collateral is not
clearly categorized as "money" but more likely an "account".  Although
certain categories of collateral can be perfected by possession, including
"money", "intangibles", which includes "accounts", cannot be perfected by
possession.  The issue comes down to whether we will accept the risk that a
wire transfer to an account designated by us constitutes "money".  Although
it is not clear, the better view is that "money" means cash in hand and not
on deposit.  The risk is that an unperfected security interest is subordinate
to various parties, including a bankruptcy trustee and to subsequently taken
but properly perfected security interests.  I will admit, however, that this
seems to be a risk that others in our market take (although likely
unknowingly).

Accordingly, to perfect the "account" a registration is likely required at
the PPR, which is something we do not want to get into.

Even then, as an "account" is an "intangible" certain conflicts rules for
perfection by registration need to be considered, as the PPSA jurisdictions
provide that perfection of an intangible is governed by the laws of the
jurisdiction where the debtor is located, as determined by the location of
its principal place of business or chief executive office. i.e.  registration
may be required in some other jurisdiction entirely.  Further, an advance
search would have to be done to see if there are competing prior
registrations.  Also, as the PPR is not a guaranteed title registry,
registration priority does not necessarily guarantee security priority, and
law firms will not typically give priority opinions under the PPSA.

Lastly, if there is an insolvency and the deposit holding institution is also
a creditor of the counterparty, there may be some argument that the deposit
holding institution will assert rights of set off over the account.

In terms of updating advice, the statutory provisions have not to my
knowledge changed.  I suppose there is some possibility that a court has
recently determined that "money" includes deposits that we are not aware of,
and I could ask outside counsel to research this issue.

Peter.

   Carol St Clair                03/20/2001 07:45 AM

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cash Collateral In Canada

Peter and Greg:
One of our counterparties is questioning why we won't accept cash collateral
in Canada.  They claim that under the current state of the law, holding cash
collateral is the method for perfecting.  Please advise.  Should we ask
Stikeman to update their advice to us on this?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Attached is a rough draft of a response letter to Wildhorse concerning the
nominations.  Barbara and I are still reviewing, so there will be some
further changes, but in the interest of time, I thought I would send this out
for everyone's review.


Price for April 6-8th  is $3.13

Thanks so much
Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Handlin/ENERGY/TXU on 04/05/2002
10:45 AM ---------------------------

"Germany, Chris" <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com> on 04/04/2002 04:16:11 PM

To:   "Mazowita, Mike" <Mike.Mazowita@ENRON.com>, "Kelly, Katherine L."
      <Katherine.L.Kelly@ENRON.com>, "Dinari, Sabra L."
      <Sabra.L.Dinari@ENRON.com>, "Denetsosie, Troy"
      <Troy.Denetsosie@ENRON.com>, "lynn.handlin@txu.com"
      <'lynn.handlin@txu.com'>
cc:   "Hill, Garrick" <Garrick.Hill@ENRON.com>, "Germany, Chris"
      <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com>

Subject:  Lone Star activity for Sat 6th - Mon 8th.

Lynn, we would like to roll the deal we've been doing all week.  For the
weekend, we are selling you 10,000 dth per day at the same point.

I will be out tomorrow.  If you have any questions please call Kathy Kelly
at 713-853-5858 or Troy Denetsosie at 713-853-5966.

Thanks

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Gerry,

Let me review my calendar in the beginning of the next year and I shall
E-mail you
with a suggested date. My assistant will update my schedule for 2001 in the
first week
of January and I shall be able to select a date for ypur presentaton.

Vince Kaminski

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 12/21/2000 10:43:50 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hello

Dear Mr. Kaminski

Please excuse the cancellation due to illness.  The students do not care who
they infect near the end of the semester, they just want to get done!

Here is my available schedule for next year.  I am now overloaded next week
with tasks to complete the semester.  I do hope that we can reschedule
during the first quarter next year.

I would note that my schedule is most free for Thursday or Friday.  I could
fly out late Wednesday night.

Cordially,

Gerry

Teaching Schedule
M 11-12
T and R 10-12 and 2-4
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
M 6-8
T 6-8
W 6-8
(R=Thursday)
Workshops:
Jan 12-13 Des Moines
Jan 26-27 Des Moines
Feb 9-10  Des Moines

IEEE WPM Conference
Feb 28-31 Columbus, Ohio


Louise,

In response to Tina's e-mail here is a quick list of the pipeline.  I am having the pretty hot list sheet updated and re-sent to you and Dave.

Tex-Mex    Pursuing other MOUs to become anchor or fill the HVDC capacity.  Max continuing negotiations with DeAcero and CFE.  ABB to visit in the next two weeks.  Possibility of magnetizing with TECO's Frontera.

Clarksdale/Yazoo  Finalizing asset mgt contracts.  To start May 1.  40MW long this summer in SPP.

AIG  Sale docs in progress.  Most work centered around asset mgt and brokerage agreement.

Ft. Pierce  forward movement on agreements this week.  Looking to revise cost estimates and timeline for Tuesday meeting.

Homestead  Switched permit application to 501Fs.  FPL still interested in 3yr tolling.  Need to present opportunity.

The rest will be included in the official hotlist memo.

Regards,
Ozzie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rode, Tina
Sent:	Friday, April 13, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Baughman, Edward D.; Brown, Michael; Curry, Mike; Pagan, Ozzie
Cc:	Duran, W David
Subject:	Re: Hot List 04-12-01

Please provide a hot list or project list to Louise as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Tina

---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Rode/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 10:58 AM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
04/13/2001 10:49 AM
To:	Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	tammie.schoppe@enron.com
Subject:	Re: Hot List 04-12-01   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Yes - but I am still looking for something similar for the rest of the groups - Baughman, Pagan, East Power and South East Power.

Tina Rode
04/13/2001 10:13 AM
To:	Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Hot List 04-12-01

Attached is the Hot List that you requested.  Let me know if you would like to receive this weekly.

Thanks,

Tina

 << File: Hot List4_12_01 Team.xls >>

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Effective today, please send future correspondence to me at :
staceykn@yahoo.com.  Thanks.


Mike and Zachary:
Enclosed are the execution versions of the Amendments which have been
executed by Enron and which Lisa will be sending to you for execution by your
client.


I attended a TXOGA pipeline committee meeting yesterday and the Grandfather
legislation was discussed in detail. The following information is in addition
to the previous message on this legislation:

Several members could not agree on whether the option being offered by TNRCC
of using old standard exemptions to "authorize" grandfathered emission
sources would be pulled off the table on September 1, 2001. The general
consensus is that companies should complete the process of using the old
exemptions by September 1 in case TNRCC does not allow this option anymore;

Although the legislation allows 0 to 20% reductions on pipeline engines in
West Texas, TNRCC has indicated that they will not require reductions in West
Texas, except for "huge emitters". No one knows what they mean by huge
emitters;

TNRCC is required to reduce compressor engine NOx emissions by 50% in East
Texas, but MAY require 50% VOC reductions in East Texas. No one has heard
whether TNRCC will require VOC reductions. VOC reductions on a 2-cycle
engine, especially on a Cooper engine with good combustion characteristics,
could be problematic;

The TXOGA Pipeline committee will take the lead on responding to the
regulations that are developed due to this legislation. I will certainly
participate in this process.

Marc


Please note the following on the 6/5/00 list:

We are shutting down Aquila Risk Management Corporation for all financial
trading effective today.  All financial trading should be done out of
Utilicorp United Inc.  This counterparty was on the original approval list,
and I previously had them shut down for financial trading.  Credit will put
them on tonight's list, meanwhile, we need to open them up to trade all
financial immediately.


Mark,

As mentioned on my voicemail message.  Please confirm that we are OK to go
ahead and have the US participate.

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Messinaj@sullcrom.com on 06/06/2000 05:34:09 PM
To: dave.samuels@enron.com, justin.boyd@enron.com,
marly.didizian@linklaters.com, nick.west@linklaters.com
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
Subject: Enron Online Game terms & disclaimers

Attached is our black lined mark-up of the disclaimers that you sent to us on
Friday.  Our additions are double underlined.   Please contact us with your
comments or questions.

J.M.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - discl.wpd


I sent an e-mail to MAPP about possibly attending the OASIS class the week of
March 19th.  Just waiting on the specific dates and times before I can
commit.  Also need to talk to the Hourly brass about attending!!!!!!!!!!!

To: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

We need to send someone with more experience than Karla and Gary have
currently.  I would suggest Pat or Matt if they can get away for a day.  If
not them, maybe they can suggest someone from the hourly desk.
ds

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bill Rust                           02/14/2001 01:34 PM

To: Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

Doug,

While I would like to go to this OASIS seminar, I will be in Las Vegas
Tuesday afternoon through Thursday night, 20 MAR - 22 MAR. Who else can we
send? Karla? Gary?

Bill Rust

	From:  Doug Sewell                           02/14/2001 10:43 AM

To: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

Bill, here is the training I told you about.  We definitely need someone to
attend to keep up with MAPP changes.  Are you on the MAPP email distribution
list yet?  Let me know if you need help getting on.
ds
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:41
AM ---------------------------

"William J. Head" <wj.head@mapp.org>@mapp.org on 02/13/2001 04:18:05 PM
Sent by: owner-rin@mapp.org
To: <rin@mapp.org>, <rtc@mapp.org>, <mrc@mapp.org>, <sot-trainers@mapp.org>,
<sotwg@mapp.org>, <mc@mapp.org>, <rrc@mapp.org>, <pemmem@mapp.org>
cc: <sco@mapp.org>, <sl.duncan@mapp.org>, <ca.anderson@mapp.org>
Subject: OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

To:    ALL OASIS USERS

From:  Tami Anderson, MAPP Transmission Operations
  Dan Fredrickson, MAPP Transmission Operations
  Jolene Gleason, MAPP Transmission Operations

Date:  Tuesday, February 13, 2001

Subject: OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

This is a notice to update the OASIS users on the status of the MAPP
implementation of the 1.4 version of OASIS.

Several processes are on-going in an effort to meet the March 1, 2001 OASIS
1.4 production date.  These include:

1. Communication process:

 a. OASIS Workshop: Feb 14-16:
All Sessions are currently full for the Lecture and Lab.

 b. For the OASIS users who were unable to attend this Workshop and are
still
interested in taking the class, MAPP Staff would like to offer another class
the week of March 19-23. We have received enough potential interest to teach
two more lecture/lab sessions. Please send an email (if you have not already
done so) to sl.duncan@mapp.org if you are interested in attending a class
during that week.

2.  Implementation process:

 a. OASIS 1.4 Beta Releases and bug fixes continue to be released by ESCA
(the JTSIN vendor) on a daily basis.  The next major software release will
be OASIS 1.4 Beta 3, on Friday, February, 16:

OASIS 1.4 Beta Release #2 is located at:
http://mappb3.oasis.mapp.org/OASIS14/NODE/MAPPB3
The only requirement to use this test node is a valid Tradewave certificate.
Please send an email to ds.fredrickson@mapp.org to indicate any problems
that are encountered while testing this beta release.

 b. MAPP Validation and Request Evaluation Processes revised:
MAPP Staff is working with OATI to implement the modifications required to
the automated
processes due to the OASIS 1.4 changes.  Testing will continue through the
month of February.

 c. Attached are tables indicating some of the major changes in requesting
service that OASIS users should be aware of.  These tables show pre- and
post-OASIS 1.4 functionality.  OASIS users are encouraged to familiarize
themselves with these changes, and to exercise them on the test site prior
to the March 1 implementation.

 d.  Coming next week: February 28 / March 1 Cutover Plan

Thank you.

Tami A. Anderson
MAPP Senior Engineer
ta.anderson@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8423

Dan Fredrickson
Supervisor
ds.fredrickson@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8441
Fax:     651-632-8417

Jolene Gleason
MAPP Senior Engineer
jl.gleason@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8444

 - Summary of OASIS 1_4 Changes.doc


Cindy, Ron's secretary, sent me the filed version.  Here it is.

Sarah

Mary Hain@ECT
10/09/2000 02:20 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Fw: Filed version of FERC filing

We made a separate filing.  Ron hasn't sent me the final draft.  But when he
sends it I'll forward it.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/06/2000 07:44 PM CDT
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Fw: Filed version of FERC filing

Sue & Mary --

What ended up happening with our filing?  Did we make a separate case?  I
liked the IEP filing but thought that it may have been too conciliatory?

Let's talk on Oct 9 Monday.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/06/2000 07:42 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/06/2000 12:12 PM

		 To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fw: Filed version of FERC filing

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/06/2000 12:12 PM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	10/05/2000 07:12 PM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Scott Noll"
<snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Rob
Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelsen" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Dean
Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>,
"Curtis Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Doug Levitt"
<SDL@calwind.com>, "Ed Maddox" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Frank
Misseldine" <fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Milton Schultz"
<bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Pete Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Robert Frees"
<freesrj@apci.com>, "Ted Cortopassi" <TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "Tom
Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Ward Scobee" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Fw: Filed version of FERC filing

Note:  Attached is the Filed version of the IEP Comments on CAISO Amendment
No. 31.  Thanks for your time and comments.

----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Brown <ABB@eslawfirm.com>
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail) <steven@iepa.com>; Katie Kaplan (E-mail)
<kaplan@iepa.com>; <smutny@iepa.com>
Cc: Douglas Kerner <DKK@eslawfirm.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:54 AM
Subject: Filed version of FERC filing

> Attached in PDF format is the final document filed at FERC today regarding
> the CAISO price cap filing.  ABB
>
> Andrew B. Brown
> Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA  95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>
>

 - 001005_IEP_Mo_Interv_ER00-3673_ISOT_Am_31.fin.PDF


great.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brawner, Sandra F.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Oxley, David
Cc:	Brawner, Sandra F.
Subject:	RE: Amendments

Yes, I signed and returned the original one last week.  Your assistant verified that Enron had received it.  It is the revised one I am curious as to the status.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Brawner, Sandra F.
Cc:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Amendments

Did you already sign? I'm happy to see if we sort out any confusion on wording later but I think we need to get a signed copy from you asap.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brawner, Sandra F.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Oxley, David
Cc:	Brawner, Sandra F.
Subject:	Amendments

David,

Per a conversation with John Lavorado he mentioned that an amended agreement was coming for my signature.  I was curious as to when I should be expecting the amended agreement, could you confirm please.


I would mention Carlos in the email, or have it shown as sent by him.  If it
were me (and not him), I would have you send it under your own name, but
explain that you are helping Carlos.

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Indian matter

I am getting ready to send Michelle Blaine a question regarding some proposed
gifts that Mat Gimble and crew want to give the "new" Seminole Indian Chief.
Would you rather the question be sent by you?  If so, let me know and I will
explain, otherwise I will just copy you on the e-mail.

K-

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Your list is very close to mine.  I'm making a list as I go back through the
draft, so I'll update when I get through.

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/01/2000 05:25 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: P.O. Exhibits

I looked through the exhibit package that you sent me.  I have highlighted
the exhibits that believe that  we definitely need.  I also listed some other
potential exhibits.  What are your thoughts on our specific requirements?

Exhibit A (Purchase Amount)--I assume that we need this schedule.
Exhibit A-1 (Contractors Affidavit)--Do we need?
Exhibit A-2 (Lien Waiver)--Do we need?
Exhibit B (Work Schedule)--I assume that we don't need this Exhibit as the
schedule is to be agreed?
Exhibit C (Seller Scope of Work)--I assume that we will attach a schedule
similar to the scope division document that we have exchanged with FCE
Exhibit C-1 (Contractor Clarifications)--Do we need this exhibit?
Exhibit C-2 (Unit Scope of Supply)--Can this document be combined with the
specifications?
Exhibit C-3 (Training)--I assume that we need this schedule?
Exhibit D (Subcontractors)--Do we need?
Exhibit E (Fuel Specifications)--I assume that we need.
Exhibit F Performance Guarantees)--Do we need since it is in the body of the
agreement?
Exhibit G (LDs)--N/A
Exhibit H (Performance Tests)--We are currently working on a draft.
Exhibit H-1 (Output & Heat Rate)--Contained in H.
Exhibit H-2 (Sound)--Should be incorporated into Exhibit H.
Exhibit H-3 (Emissions)--Should be incorporated into Exhibit H.
Exhibit H-4 (Ready for Test)--Do we need?
Exhibit I (Insurance)--Do we need?
Exhibit J (Enron Guaranty)--Do we need?
Exhibit K (Site Plan)--N/A.
Exhibit L (Seller Guarantee)--Do we need to cover advance delay payments?
Exhibit M (Governmental)--Do we need?
Exhibit N (Owner Obligations)--We need.
Exhibit O (Change Order)--Do we need?
Exhibit P (Specs)--Probably need to be conceptual design.

Additional Exhibits
1.  Form of Release.
2.  Water Specifications.
3.  Degradation Curves.


Vince,
Thanks!
?
Can you also let me know who my contact is for getting copy approved by
Enron so we can use it in our publications?? I will try Fiona Grant again,
but I'm not getting anywhere.
?
Thanks,
Julie
----- Original Message -----
From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
To: Julie
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:16  PM
Subject: Re: new invoice for energy and  weather

Julie,

I signed the request for a check  today.

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com> on  05/09/2001 04:47:05 PM

Please respond to "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>

To:??  "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:??  <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
Subject:?  new invoice for energy and weather

Vince,

Please find  attached a replacement invoice for invoice number 215. ? This
invoice  includes the correction in charges for the weather course, and for
only one  attendee for the energy derivatives course.

If you should have any  questions, please contact me.

Sincerely,
Julie
(See attached  file: Enron283_9_04_01.doc)


This looks good!  Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:06 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	10/25/2000 08:01 AM

		 To: tom.briggs@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Gramm Proposed Changes

Please find attached Part 1 of  <<Gramm changes 1.pdf>> the proposed changes
from Gramm staff to the House passed version of the CEA bill.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Gramm changes 1.pdf


It appears that the only position under this CP's GTC expired in Mar02.  Therefore the only issue on TRC is the A/R of $275,466 (consisting of Jan02 invoice amount $132,370 and Mar02 invoice amount $143,096).  In our list we show this CP with a status of "expired."  No need to send termination letter.

Susan: please update the Demand Letter Log -
	Termination Letter column: Expired
	Comment column: $275,466 A/R outstanding.  On 3/12/02 Charles Comfort of TRC said TRC will pay the Jan02 invoice this month and will pay the Mar02 invoice in April.

Thanks

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Phil,  Can you send Tyrell the schedule that is to be attached as Appendix A?


FYI.  Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 10:40
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nicole West @ ENRON                           01/24/2000 05:11 PM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Corp.'s Subsidiaries


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 09:04 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/31/2001 05:04 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, "msmith1@enron.com" <msmith1@enron.com>,
"ryang@enron.com" <ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: FW: Audit Reports in A.00-11-038 et al.]

Attached, please find the CPUC's audit of PG&E.

Received: (qmail 13015 invoked by uid 41); 31 Jan 2001 17:08:39 -0000
Received: from smtp.gmssr.com (HELO nt2.gmssr.com) (38.227.228.2)  by
mx7.quiknet.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 17:08:39 -0000
Received: by nt2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <D4Z37A0S>; Wed,
31 Jan 2001 08:49:43 -0800
Message-ID: <415FF4AF3C7BD111AD1F00805FCB6D4A359A2C@nt2>
From: MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>
To: "'Scott Govenar, Enron lobbyist'" <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Subject: FW: Audit Reports in A.00-11-038 et al.
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:49:41 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C08BA5.CE72E4A0"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

-----Original Message-----
From: Hartmann, Audra [mailto:ath@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:54 PM
To: 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'ad046@detroit.freenet.org'; 'anchau@shellus.com';
Minkin, Angela K.; 'aorchard@smud.org'; 'askaff@energy-law-group.com';
Hartmann, Audra; 'athomas@newenergy.com'; 'berry@apx.com';
'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'bill.mccallum@ci.fresno.ca.us';
'blaising@braunlegal.com'; 'bloomje@la.whitecase.com';
'bob_anderson@apses.com'; 'bpowers@seniors.org';
'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'; 'btenney@landuselaw.com'; 'cafield@pirg.org';
Linsey, Steve; 'chilen@llgm.com'; 'chrism@mid.org';
'chrisw@greenlining.org'; 'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com'; Walwyn, Christine M.;
'ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net'; 'cpeyton@sacbee.com';
'cread@steptoe.com'; Danforth, Christopher; 'dcarroll@dbsr.com';
'ddavie@hesinet.com'; 'derkp@newsdata.com';
'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'dkk@eslawfirm.com'; Lafrenz, Donald J.;
'dmarcus@slip.net'; 'douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov';
'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'ed@apx.com'; 'ed@clfp.com'; 'edwardoneill@dwt.com';
'ell5@pge.com'; 'emitchel@angnewspapers.com'; 'epoole@adplaw.com';
'fchristi@arterhadden.com'; 'fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov'; 'foothill@lmi.net';
'fosterbc@sce.com'; 'foxba@sce.com'; 'frank.cooley@sce.com'; Fua, Faline;
'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'fwmonier@tid.org'; 'gdreed@sidley.com';
'georgeperrault@msn.com'; 'gerhordt.herbert@msdw.com'; Kinosian, Robert;
'glwaas@calpx.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com' <mailto:'gtbl@dynegy.com'> ;
'hbd@gweiss.com'; 'hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us'; 'hf@energy-law-group.com';
'hodgesjl@pacbell.net'; 'honest@compuserve.com'; 'howens@seniors.org'
<mailto:'howens@seniors.org'> ; 'huse@eesconsulting.com';
'imoosen@gralegal.com'; 'j3m9@pge.com'; 'jbarthrop@powersavers.com';
'jbennett@gmssr.com' <mailto:'jbennett@gmssr.com'> ; 'jbushee@sablaw.com';
'jcpaine@stoel.com'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com'; 'jeff@hmhresources.com';
'jep@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'jerryl@abag.ca.gov' <mailto:'jerryl@abag.ca.gov'> ;
Zeller, Jason; 'jleslie@luce.com'; Lo, Jeanette; 'jlondon@gralegal.com';
'jlyoung@sempra.com'; 'jmalkin@orrick.com'; 'jnnc@chevron.com'
<mailto:'jnnc@chevron.com'> ; 'joe.paul@dynegy.com'; 'jogg@jhenergy.com';
'jon.jacobs@paconsulting.com'; 'joseh@lif.org'; 'jparrott@sempra.com'
<mailto:'jparrott@sempra.com'> ; DeUlloa, Joseph R.;
'jsilva@edisonenterprises.com'; 'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com';
'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; Wong, John S.; 'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us';
'julesan@aol.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org'; 'jyf1@pge.com'; 'jyoung@ebmud.com';
'karen@klindh.com' <mailto:'karen@klindh.com'> ;
'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com'; Malcolm, Kim; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com';
'kmcspadd@milbank.com'; 'kmelville@sempra.com'; 'kmills@cfbf.com'
<mailto:'kmills@cfbf.com'> ; Kajopaiye, Kayode; 'kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com';
Hattevik, Kerry; 'ktilton@gralegal.com'; 'lgurick@calpx.com';
'ljhubbard@sempra.com' <mailto:'ljhubbard@sempra.com'> ;
'LKristov@energy.state.ca.us'; 'lmh@eslawfirm.com'; 'luluw@newsdata.com';
'LVanWagenen@sempra.com'; 'lys@aelaw.com' <mailto:'lys@aelaw.com'> ;
'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com';
'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com' <mailto:'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com'> ;
Stevens, Maria E.; 'mgomez1@bart.gov'; 'mhg@hetrading.com';
'mmattes@nossaman.com'; 'mpa@aelaw.com'; 'mrh2@pge.com'
<mailto:'mrh2@pge.com'> ; 'mschwebs@energy.state.ca.us'; 'mshames@ucan.org';
'musicamaria@yahoo.com'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'natutt@duanemorris.com'
<mailto:'natutt@duanemorris.com'> ; 'nevillm@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us';
'normkr@aol.com'; 'nryan@environmentaldefense.org'; 'NXK2@pge.com';
'oshirock@pacbell.net' <mailto:'oshirock@pacbell.net'> ;
'pat.williams@dhcmail.com'; 'patrickm@crossborderenergy.com';
'paul.harris@bridge.com' <mailto:'paul.harris@bridge.com'> ;
'pbray@newpower.com'; 'peter_fox-penner@brattle.com'; 'phanschen@mofo.com';
'picketse@sce.com'; 'pjmuller@ricochet.net' <mailto:'pjmuller@ricochet.net'>
; 'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'; 'pmcdonne@wenet.net'; 'psly@ebmud.com';
'randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov'; 'randy_britt@mayco.com'; White, Rosalina;
'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'rcosta@turn.org'; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com';
'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'RJP2@pge.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com'
<mailto:'rliebert@cfbf.com'> ; 'rmccann@cal.net';
'robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com'; 'rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com';
'ronknecht@aol.com'; 'rpernell@energy.state.ca.us'
<mailto:'rpernell@energy.state.ca.us'> ; 'rrcollins@n-h-i.org';
'rrh3@pge.com'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'rtavares@energy.state.ca.us';
Feraru, Robert T.; 'sberlin@mccarthylaw.com'; 'scottst@mid.org';
'sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'; Casey, Sean F.;
'sgreenberg@realenergy.com' <mailto:'sgreenberg@realenergy.com'> ;
Gallagher, Sean H.; 'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us'; 'smoss@hooked.net';
'smutny@iepa.com'; 'ssmyers@worldnet.att.net'
<mailto:'ssmyers@worldnet.att.net'> ; 'thaines@smud.org';
'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us'; 'thoulihan@mdbe.com';
'tom.oneill@abnamro.com'; 'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'
<mailto:'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'> ; 'twetzel@thermoecotek.com';
'uwua@worker.com'; 'wbooth@booth-law.com'; 'whe1@pge.com'; Tapawan-Conway,
Zenaida G.; Pedersen, Susan; Malcolm, Kim
Subject: Audit Reports in A.00-11-038 et al.

 Here is the PG&E Audit, Commissioner Lynch's statement and the ruling
regarding confidentiality.

<<bwg_pge_report.pdf>> <<STATEMENT OF PUC COMMISSIONER LORETTA LYNCH
1-29.doc>> <<Ruling.DOC>>

 - bwg_pge_report.pdf
 - STATEMENT OF PUC COMMISSIONER LORETTA LYNCH 1-29.doc
 - Ruling.DOC


Sally,

Shari Mao contacted her boyfriend and he gave her the name of a larynx
specialist at Methodist Hospital - Dr. Donald T. Donovan (713-798-5900).  I
hope this might be helpful.

Lisa Cousino


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:11 PM ---------------------------

"Oliver Bennett" <conf-ny@msn.com> on 12/23/99 04:43:51 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: speaker confirmation - Risk 2000, Boston, 13 & 14 June 2000

Dear Vince,

Do you think you would be able to confirm a talk title and bullet points for
your 'new research' talk by the end of the first week of January?  In terms
of the panel discussion we will confirm the actual content and structure
closer to the date of the conference - in the meantime, if you have any ideas
as to how we can make the panel as discussive as possible that would be great.

Best regards,
Oliver

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
    To: Oliver Bennett <conf-ny@msn.com>
    Cc: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
    Date: 22 December 1999 17:25
    Subject: Re: speaker confirmation - Risk 2000, Boston, 13 & 14 June 2000

    Oliver,

    I can cover both presentations.

    Vince

    "Oliver Bennett" <conf-ny@msn.com> on 12/21/99 09:47:30 AM

    To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
    cc:   Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
    Subject:  speaker confirmation - Risk 2000, Boston, 13 & 14 June 2000

    Dear Vince,

    Thank you for agreeing to take part in our annual US congress.
    There were 2 things that I would ideally like you to be involved in.  The
first
    would be to present any new research you may have.  This would be part of
stream
    3 (see attached) which looks at new research in derivatives modelling and
    analysis.  If you would like to present any new research that fits into
the
    rough areas outlined that would be great.
    The second would be part of a panel discussion on weather derivatives
(number 44
    attached).  I have also invited Jeff Porter (Koch) and Ravi Nathan
(Aquila).
    Please let me know if you would like to present any new research and/or
take
    part in the panel.

    i look forward to hearing from you soon.

    Best regards,
    Oliver

    Direct: 212 925 1864 ext.152

    Risk Publications, 270 Lafayette Street, Suite 700, NY 10012, New York
    Fax: 212 925 7585  Email: conf-ny@msn.com
    www.riskpublications.com

 - att1.htm


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001
10:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Tom Briggs on 07/12/2001 10:43 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

cc:

Subject: Congressman Ose loved your letter to Sen. Dunn


Hi everyone.

Here is the DivPerqs list including Board members & DiverseDonors. Please
review and let me know if there are people you would like us to send a
letter of invitation to.

Here's who is on the list for the collectors tour

Heidi and David Gerger
Christy and Lou Cushman
Alton and Emily steiner
Emily Todd
Jay moore
Marshal and Victoria Lightman
Maria Sicardi
Beverley and Howard Robinson

Let me know what you think about that list

 - Diverse Perqs.xls


Per my earlier email, are we trying to get Koch Hydrocarbon Co. changed to
reflect the legal entity as part of the counterparty name?


Attached is a draft of the Consent to Assignment and Agreement relating
to the transfer of certain turbine contracts into the TurboPark
structure.  Please note that the attached is being distributed in
advance of review by Enron and remains subject to its comments in every
respect.

Regards, <<GE Consent to Assignment.DOC>>

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.

 - GE Consent to Assignment.DOC


this weekend we have to hit this new bar called the hub.  i heard it was full
of hotties.  start there and end in your environment (merc room).  how was
cali?


I don't see you in MSN Messenger either.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quezada, Daniel
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Your phone

Chris,
	Your phone is installed down here so i don't think you'll be able to answer it over there.  Do you want me to forward it to Judy's line, temporarily?


i lost your number in austin.  i tried to give you a call last night and
clear up our argument  from saturday.  that got way out of hand and i
apologize for that.  there is no reason for me to be such a hot head about
that.  give me a call when you get a chance and we can clear up that mess.
your parents got your stuff yesterday.  let me know what you want to do with
that tv.  talk to you later.

matt


Hello Celeste:

Plans are in the works to rotate Roy Ibasco from the Research Group into
Henry Arora's group.  Vanessa Carranza is handling the churn request.  I am
not sure of the rotation date, but we need his desk by the 15th for Gwyn
Koepke.

You probably already know all of this, but just in case.

Shirley
3-5290


Current NCL Jr. Members has invited you to "NCL Jr. New Member Social".

Click below to visit Evite for more information about the event and also to RSVP.
http://www.evite.com/r?iid=DBUDQEUKLMXPYYZODLZN

This invitation was sent to you by Current NCL Jr. Members using Evite. To remove yourself
from this guest list please contact us at support@evite.com

This Evite Invite is covered by Evite's privacy policy*.
To view this privacy policy, click here:
http://www.evite.com/privacy

*********************************

*********************************

HAVING TROUBLE?
Perhaps your email program doesn't recognize the Web address as an active
link. To view your invitation, copy the entire URL and paste it into your browser.

If you would like further assistance, please send
email to support@evite.com

* Updated 03/15/01.


Here is the map of our peakers plants.  I am looking for some good bullet
points to go along with them.
Ben


Torrey/Dawn -

Do you guys really think this is a reasonable reqeust.  Looks like there are
in excess of 1500 deals.  If you guys need this field covered,  we need to
come up with a better process than manually changing deals in TAGG.  Let me
know how you would like to handle this or if we need to discuss further.  We
will be happy to assist you any way we can,  short of manually going into
1500 deals.

Thanks

Dawn C Kenne
03/13/2001 05:13 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Broker Clean Up

Jeff,

I am attaching a list of EOL transactions that we need your help "cleaning
up".  With the new Broker-Client application that EOL is bringing on this
weekend, we need to remove EOL from the broker field.  What we have run into
is:  there are many deals in Tagg that have EOL in the broker field but no
EOL number.  We are requesting that risk go through and add the EOL deal
number to the tagg legs where there is none listed.  The reason for this is
that if we remove EOL from the broker field and there is no EOL deal number
reference, then there is no way to no if that deal is an EOL deal.  For audit
purposes, no one could tie back to the deals.

Please give this list to the appropriate risk groups (by index).  Let me know
if you have any further questions.  ALSO, this list is in addition to the
list that I provided Errol yesterday.

Thank you,
Dawn


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
04:13 PM ---------------------------

Mail Delivery Subsystem <Mailer-Daemon@postmaster.enron.com> on 01/29/2001
02:12:38 PM
To: <Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable

The original message was received at Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:11:55 GMT
from [172.28.10.37]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<kcowan@dynegy.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to decmail.dynegy.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<kcowan@dynegy.com>
<<< 554 Mailbox unavailable.
554 <kcowan@dynegy.com>... Service unavailable

   ----- Original message follows -----

Return-Path: <Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com>
Received: from nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.37])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id UAA14891
 for <kcowan@dynegy.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:11:55 GMT
From: Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id
<Tac1c0a2551674dfc3c@nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com> for <kcowan@dynegy.com>;
 Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:11:55 -0600
To: kcowan@dynegy.com
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:11:59 -0600
Message-ID: <OF5997D92A.4A4B2BE2-ON862569E3.006E0453@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at
 01/29/2001 02:10:16 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hey Kenny.

Thanks for checking on me.  My trip to Omaha was okay.  On one hand, it
gave me a real good idea of what type of shape Daddy really is in.  It's
not real good, but he feels optimistic.  You know he has prostate cancer
and I believe it has started spreading into the bones.  He's very, very
weak, can't walk more than 10 to 20 steps without becoming physically worn
out.  Mom has to drive him everywhere he goes, (he doesn't go that many
places).  He's definitely has his good days and his bad days.  He is taking
regular pain pills constantly and has morphine tablets for extreme pain,
which he's in half the time.  It's really sad.  He's lost alot of weight,
but he's in good spirits I guess.    To talk to him over the phone or hear
him over tje radio, you would swear he's in great health.  It's was really
hard for me to get a true perspective because I know he was trying to put
on his best act, so that I would not worry.   It's extremely hard to see
your parents going through this kind of suffering.

He says he going to beat this thing, so alot of times, it's mind over
matter, along with lots of prayer.

Mom is wanting to quit her job, (she's a teachers aide), but Daddy doesn't
want her to do it.  Daddy says he's going back to work.  Please pray for
Mom as well, I know she's scared to death, and doesn't know what to really
do.

Talk to you later!