---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:19
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 08:03:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG January 2000 deliveries

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
08:09 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 12:22 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Frank
Kronz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Nancy Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Jodi Lutz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: CNG January 2000 deliveries

Hope - approximately 1224 dth per day (this does not include Bayer and Eagle
Glass will swing)

EOG - I will not need any CNG gas for East Ohio.  I will be using most of the
Sempra (5000 dth per day ) gas 4585 dth for my FRPS pool #11344 and 33 dth for
my GRPS pool #10478.    This will leave 382 dth of the Sempra gas for you to
sell.    Please let me know to whom we are selling that to as soon as possible
as I need to release the gate space.

Please let me know if you need any additional info.    Thanks.


Tom:

I forwarded a copy of the ECI unanimous consent to Goldman to see if they
will accept "as is".  I have not heard back.  Goldman legal will email repo
docs.

Regarding Enron Credit Limited ("ECL"), I spoke with Goldman commercial and
understand that someone (don't know who) from London ECL contacted Goldman
inquiring about repos.  I'm happy to facilitate with contacts, etc. so please
let me know.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 01:29 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Whenever you decide whether the UCD for ECI is sufficient or not please let
me know urgently.  Management in London has some aggressive expectations for
a deliverable on repos.  We will have to push back on them if the UCD has to
be redrafted.

I would very much like to give management a clear status and a realistic
time-frame for when we can expect to have the repo capacity in place.

I do recognize the time frame is highly dependent on what the current
situation actually is.  Therefore I am hopeful we can answer the below
questions sooner than later.

If I can provide any help in anyway please let me know.

Tom,

04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara, I do not agree with the view that we cannot use the existing
resolutions for repos.  Please call me at your convenience so that we can
discuss.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Tom Doukas
	04/16/2001 08:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

I am assuming that you are saying that if repos go through the Prime Broker
accounts it is a problem.  The poblem being that the current brokerage
agreements for ECI do not provide for repos.  Is my assumption correct?

Is our UCD adequate as is for repos?

What is our existing format that you mention below?

Are you able to pursue this with Goldman right now today?

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 08:36 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I am not certain that the existing resolution permits repurchase and reverse
repurchase transactions and securities lending, bonds borrow pledge, etc. as
the brokerage consent was not written to accommodate these types of
transactions.  However, if the repo party will accept our existing format,
then we need not worry.  I'll call Ted Leh and try to find the proper Goldman
person.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 08:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Hedger/LON/ECT@ECT, Reza Rezaeian/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara,

Can you please provide your findings on the following items:

1. Determine with Cheryl that ECI is in fact authorized to transact Repos

2. How robust the Goldman Repo agreements are, and their sutability to ECI.

3. An estimate on how long it will take to set up the Goldman Repo Agreements
in ECI's name.

Can you please also provide any ideas how ECI or ECL could transact a Repo
trade today using existing documentation.

London has indicated an urgent need to carry out these transactions.

Thanks,

Tom


you're right....they're full

	Matthew Arnold

	09/11/2000 02:26:50 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: dmb

tuesday night?


The proposal is totally satisfactory to Ken Lay.

Rosalee

"Holloway, Wanda" <Wanda.Holloway@COMPAQ.com> on 04/19/2001 01:44:06 PM
To: "'klay@enron.com'" <klay@enron.com>, "'lynnj@iname.com'" <lynnj@iname.com>
cc: "'babbio@verizon.com'" <babbio@verizon.com>, "Jackson, Yvonne"
<Yvonne.Jackson@COMPAQ.com>
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL:  HR Committee Approval Requested for Option Grant

In light of Jesse Greene's acceptance of the SVP, Strategy position, we have
re-examined his option opportunity for 2001.  As you recall, we deferred a
decision on his option grant in December 2000 pending a decision on his
status.

Now that Jesse has accepted this new role, we are recommending a grant of
125,000 stock options, which is comparable to the December 2000 grant to
other 16b officers in staff positions.  As a point of reference, below are
the option grants made to 16b officers in December 2000:

Blackmore - 375k
Winkler - 350k
Larson - 275k
McDowell - 250k
Elias - 150k
Jackson - 175k
Siekman - 155k
Napier - 155k
Fox - 125k
Milton - 100k
Clarke - 75k (received additional grant of 175k options upon appointment to
CFO)
Walker - 60k (received 250k new hire options in September)
Robison - 0 (recently received new hire grant)

If you have any questions or concerns about this proposal, please let Yvonne
or I know.  If it is acceptable, please advise and we will provide a
unanimous consent for your signature to formalize.  Thank you!

Wanda G. Holloway
Associate General Counsel - Human Resources
Compaq Computer Corporation
MS110701
20555 SH 249
Houston, TX  77070-2698
281-518-6943 (phone)/281-518-7644 (fax)


Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 1:12 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: NG Energy Assignment

 << File: Export.doc >>
here you go
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 1:10 PM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	NG Energy Assignment

 Would you email me confirm # 1148026.    Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Wyoming.Fort Union Gas Gathering.
09/24/2001
Natural Gas Week

EOTT'S RECAPITALIZATION WILL INCLUDE CONVERSION OF UNITS, NEW FINANCING
09/24/2001
Petroleum Finance Week

Stock Rating Reiterations Closing Update
09/24/2001
Dow Jones News Service

APGA Urges EIA to Gather Gas Data to Dampen Price Volatility
NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : September 25, 2001

COMPANIES & FINANCE INTERNATIONAL - Appetite for North American energy assets remains strong
By SHEILA MCNULTY and KEN WARN.
09/25/2001
Financial Times

CALIFORNIA PREMIUM GASOLINE DROPS TO 91 OCTANE RATING
09/24/2001
Octane Week

Williams Invests Big in Deepwater.
09/24/2001
Natural Gas Week
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wyoming.Fort Union Gas Gathering.

09/24/2001
Natural Gas Week
P14
(c) 2001 Energy Intelligence Group. All rights reserved
Fort Union Gas Gathering announced that as of Sept. 5 it had tested and placed in service a 62-mile expansion of its system which will allow it to accommodate increased natural gas production in the Powder River Basin. Gathering system capacity is now at 634 MMcf/d, up from 434 MMcf/d before the expansion.
The system now extends roughly 105 miles from near Gillette, Wyoming, south to Glenrock, Wyoming. The system interconnects with Colorado Interstate Gas' Powder River lateral, the KN Interstate system, and Wyoming Interstate's Medicine Bow Lateral.
Fort Union Gas is a limited liability company whose partners are affiliates of CMS Energy, Northern Border Partners, Western Gas Resources, El Paso and Williams.

EOTT'S RECAPITALIZATION WILL INCLUDE CONVERSION OF UNITS, NEW FINANCING

09/24/2001
Petroleum Finance Week
(c) 2001 Phillips Business Information, Inc.
EOTT Energy Partners L. P. (NYSE: EOT) announced a recapitalization that will include a conversion of outstanding subordinated units and additional partnership interests (APIs) into common units and implementation of a refinancing plan. Upon the plan's successful completion, directors of EOTT's general partner, EOTT Energy Corp., intend to increase the annual cash distribution on common units from $1.90 to $1.95. Elements of the plan require unitholder approval, which will be sought later this year. "We believe that the plan enhances the value of EOTT's common units and places our common unitholders in a position to realize immediate benefit from increases in the partnership's available cash," said EOTT Chairman Stan Horton.
In the conversion of subordinated units and APIs to common units, Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) and Koch Petroleum Group L.P. have agreed to convert all 9 million outstanding subordinated units and $9.3 million of APIs into approximately 4.3 million common units. EOTT anticipates that these changes in capital structure will enhance its ability to increase cash distributions to its common unitholders. An amendment to the partnership agreement will be required to make the conversion.
EOTT also intends to affect equity and long-term debt offerings to refinance short-term debt incurred in connection with a $117 million asset acquisition that it completed in June 2001. The Houston partnership also intends to replace its existing working capital credit facility with a new bank credit line. EOTT said that the financings, which it expects to complete by the end of the year, would not require it to amend the partnership agreement.

Stock Rating Reiterations Closing Update: TUNE INTU CHKP

09/24/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Company               Symbol  Brokerage Firm        Reiterated Rating:
Microtune             TUNE    Prudential             Buy
Intuit                INTU    Prudential             Buy
Check Point Sftwr     CHKP    Buckingham Research    Strong Buy
Quest Diagnostics     DGX     Merrill Lynch          NT Buy/LT Buy
Thoratec Labs         THOR    Adams Harkness         Buy
Star Gas Prtnrs       SGU     Dain Rauscher Wessels  Buy
No. Border Prtnrs     NBP     Dain Rauscher Wessels  Buy
Sanmina               SANM    CSFB                   Strong Buy
Juniper Networks      JNPR    Buckingham Research    Neutral
Vitria Tech           VITR    Buckingham Research    Accumulate
Netegrity             NETE    Buckingham Research    Strong Buy

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : September 25, 2001
APGA Urges EIA to Gather Gas Data to Dampen Price Volatility
The American Public Gas Association (APGA) has called on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to begin collecting and distributing "relevant and timely" natural gas production and consumption information on a regular basis to help temper the "extreme price swings" in the market.
"We believe that such information, if available on a timely basis, would achieve the twin goals of providing better transparency in the marketplace and effectively promoting stability in natural gas markets," wrote APGA President Bob Cave in a letter Friday to EIA Acting Administrator Mary Jean Hutzler.
Specifically, the group of municipal distributors urged the Department of Energy (DOE) agency to "exercise its broad jurisdiction" under the Federal Energy Administration Act (FEAA) to "collect and disseminate" information pertaining to production, production capability, pipeline capacity, pipeline capacity utilization and end-use consumption by customer class. This "is not intended as an inclusive list of needed information, but rather as a starting point."
By gathering this additional information, Cave believes the overriding significance that the gas industry currently attaches to the American Gas Association's (AGA) weekly storage reports would diminish. "AGA's weekly storage report is an important piece of data because industry participants perceive it as an indicator of the balance in supply and demand. But, because it is just about the only relevant and timely data available in the marketplace, there is an inordinate amount of price volatility associated with its anticipated release and its actual release," he said.
APGA "firmly believes that the only way to combat such volatility is to make available to the marketplace other relevant production and consumption data, so that the AGA report is viewed in its proper perspective," Cave noted.
The group recommended that the EIA meet with other industry trade groups and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission "as promptly as possible to develop a comprehensive list of the needed data to permit EIA to fulfill its statutory mission" under the FEAA.

COMPANIES & FINANCE INTERNATIONAL - Appetite for North American energy assets remains strong - The pace ...
By SHEILA MCNULTY and KEN WARN.

09/25/2001
Financial Times
(c) 2001 Financial Times Limited . All Rights Reserved
COMPANIES & FINANCE INTERNATIONAL - Appetite for North American energy assets remains strong - The pace of mergers and acquisitions in the oil and gas industry shows no sign of slowing, write Ken Warn and Sheila McNulty.
Global economic uncertainty and weak oil and gas prices are not slowing the pace of consolidation in the North American energy industry.
With some oil and gas companies bullish on energy prices over the longer term, Canadian assets, in particular, look set to remain in strong demand.
The appetite for energy assets could even strengthen as companies look for secure and readily accessible oil and gas supplies following the attacks on the US, some analysts believe.
"We are starting to see a lot more interest in domestic players," says Martin Molyneaux of Calgary-based First Energy Capital. "Assets in political hot spots have been sharply marked down."
Duke Energy, the biggest US utility owner, last week agreed to buy Westcoast Energy, a Canadian pipeline company, for about USDollars 8.5bn in cash, stock and assumed debt.
TransCanada Pipelines, the country's biggest pipeline company, on Friday sold some of its gas marketing and trading operations to a unit of BP.
At least two other Canadian energy companies may be on the block.
Husky Energy, the integrated oil and gas producer, confirmed last week it was in talks with unnamed "parties" on "potential transactions".
Calgary-based Husky, which is majority-owned by companies controlled by Li Ka-shing, the Hong Kong businessman, has a market capitalisation of C$7.9bn (USDollars 5.04bn).
The company has heavy oil assets in western Canada, refining and marketing operations, and expertise in natural gas. Husky's assets could be divided among several purchasers, analysts believe, with US, Canadian or international companies among the possible buyers.
Canadian Hunter, a smaller producer which is focused on natural gas, has seen its share price rise 15 per cent over the past four weeks amid takeover speculation.
"Any American company that wants to set up a presence in Canadian natural gas could find Canadian Hunter attractive," Mr Molyneaux says.
PanCanadian Petroleum, one of Canada's biggest natural gas producers, is one of a handful of Canadian companies seen as having the scale to be a consolidator in the industry, but even it could fall prey to a US or international buyer. It is due to be spun off next month by majority-owner Canadian Pacific.
US energy companies say they have been increasingly looking to Canada because it is relatively unexplored compared with the US.
"Reserves have generally declined in the US over the past 10 years," says Rob McKee, executive vice-president of exploration and production at Conoco.
"The lower 48 states are much more drilled and explored than Canada is." Conoco itself acquired Gulf Canada Resources in July in a USDollars 6.3bn deal - the largest oil and gas deal in Canadian history.
Analysts suspect the terrorist attacks on the US could bolster the arguments for opening the environmentally sensitive Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to drilling.
That would lessen US dependence on foreign energy sources. "Perhaps this will provide the push to open up the Arctic refuge," says Bill Featherston of UBS Warburg.
Investors' wariness of energy companies with assets in politically sensitive areas has taken its toll on Canada's Talisman Energy, which has seen its share price under pressure since the attacks on the US.
Talisman has a 25 per cent stake in the Greater Nile Oil Project in Sudan, a country wracked by civil war and which was formerly a haven for Osama bin Laden.

CALIFORNIA PREMIUM GASOLINE DROPS TO 91 OCTANE RATING

09/24/2001
Octane Week
(c) 2001 Phillips Business Information, Inc.
With little fanfare, the octane rating of premium gasoline in California has dropped from 92 to 91. The change occurred in the first week of August. While the California Energy Commission (CEC) says the switch was made to help refiners deal with the upcoming MTBE ban in the state beginning in 2003 and the subsequent demand for ethanol, some say other factors are at work - such as Unocal's RFG patents.
"To say it's just the ethanol issue... no way," said Will Woods, executive director of the Automotive Trade Organizations of California. "We don't believe that for one minute."
The CEC lowered the octane rating of premium gasoline in California after asking Kinder Morgan, the state's primary fuel pipeline operator, to survey oil refiners about whether or not they wanted to make the change, said CEC spokesperson Rob Schlichting. When refiners said yes, the CEC made the switch, he said. "As California moves ahead without MTBE, it is difficult to create 92 octane gasoline," he continued. "They would have to use a lot of other blending components."
It's cheaper to use Unocal's patents to make 92 octane gasoline than it is to blend around them, Woods said. But it's even cheaper to switch to 91 octane and never have to worry about the Unocal patents again, he continued.
Schlichting admits that he has heard that avoiding the Unocal patents is a big benefit of the new octane rating, but said that was not the reason the CEC did its initial study. The decision was not made with any government involvement, and was a result of industry input, he said.
While the octane rating has dropped, the price of premium gasoline has not dropped accordingly, Schlichting also acknowledged. "I don't think it's enough of a quality change that you'll see a drop in price," he said. "After all, it's not inferior gasoline."
"It sounds like a profit maximizing strategy to me," Unocal spokesman Barry Lane said. "We find it very interesting that they drop octane, but margins remain the same. The consumer will ultimately decide if this is a good idea or not."

Williams Invests Big in Deepwater.

09/24/2001
Natural Gas Week
P18
(c) 2001 Energy Intelligence Group. All rights reserved
Williams will invest more than $400 million to develop the infrastructure for the Devils Tower deepwater project, the company announced last week.
Devils Tower is being developed through an innovative, but increasingly popular, third-party midstream transaction by Williams. The field will be majority owned and operated by Dominion Exploration & Production, while Williams will build the infrastructure for Dominion to use (17#37-07).
In exchange for the use of the facilities required to produce the Devils Tower field, Dominion and Pioneer Natural Resources, the minority field owner, will make fixed monthly payments. Williams will own the floating production facility and export pipelines. Williams has contracted with Dominion to operate the floating production facilities.
A portion of the expected revenues for the project through 2011 will come from these fixed payments associated with the use of the infrastructure. The fixed payments will begin upon facility commissioning and will provide more than 50% of the anticipated revenue for the first five years of the project, Williams said.
Williams will assume responsibility for payment of the truss spar floating production facility which Dominion had already contracted from J. Ray McDermott's SparTEC subsidiary. The facility will handle up to 60,000 b/d of oil from as many as eight wells. First production is expected in mid-2003. Reserves are estimated at 50 million-75 million bbl of oil.
The field is located in Mississippi Canyon Block 773 in 5,600 feet of water. Dominion is the operator and 75% interest holder. Pioneer has the remaining stake.
In addition, Williams plans to build two separate oil and gas pipelines from the floating production facility. The 18-inch Canyon Chief gas pipeline will run 96 miles to the Mobile Bay lateral owned by Transco, a unit of Williams. The Transco lateral will move the product to Williams' Mobile Bay gas processing plant. The natural gas liquids will then be shipped to Williams' Baton Rouge fractionator and other downstream markets on the Tri-States and Wilprise pipelines, which are operated and partly owned by Williams.
The oil line, the Mountaineer pipeline, will transport crude oil from the deepwater platform to an onshore oil terminal.


Here is letter from the AG.
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:39 PM
> To: Andy Pickens (E-mail); Barrett H. Reasoner (E-mail); David J. Noonan
> (E-mail); Jean Frizzell (E-mail); Michael L. Kirby (E-mail); Michael
> Molland; Mike D. Smith (E-mail); Peter Meringolo; Richard B. Sanders Esq.
> (E-mail); Robert C. Williams (E-mail); Susan Bisop (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: Document Preservation Letter for Enron
>
> FYI
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Rochman [mailto:ROCHMAR@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 9:43 AM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Subject: Document Preservation Letter for Enron
>
>  <<EnronPreservationLetter.wpd>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - EnronPreservationLetter.wpd


----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 03:46 PM -----

	Sheila Glover
	08/17/2000 03:24 AM

		 To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clara
Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Japan Trading and Enron Global Markets LLC Trading

Susan,
I would appreciate your assistance in determining how the book needs to be
organized.  In what legal entity it needs to be.  The P&L for management
purposes will roll up to Financial Trading in Global Markets.
Thanks. Sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 17/08/2000 03:17
---------------------------
From: John Viverito@ENRON on 17/08/2000 03:16
To: Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Enron Japan Trading and Enron Global Markets LLC Trading

 Darren-

 Pursuant to your questions relating to interest rate and foreign exchange
trading in Japan, please review the advice below:

 Interest Rates and Foreign Exchange Transactions.

 Transactions with respect to interest rates and foreign exchange (other than
financial futures transactions) are generally not subject to specific
regulation in Japan.  Banks, securities companies are permitted to enter into
transactions of this type as part of their ancillary business, but are not
granted an exclusive mandate to conduct these transactions.

 Accordingly, it would be possible for Enron Japan Corp. to conduct interest
rate and foreign exchange transactions with ordinary Japanese corporations as
well as financial institutions.

 However, in the event that Enron Japan does conduct interest rate or foreign
exchange transactions with a  corporation that is not a financial
institution, the risk that the transaction may be considered to be gambling
increases.  The fact that one of the parties to a derivative transaction is
authorized by statute to enter into the transaction will constitute a defense
to an allegation that the transaction constitutes gambling.  If neither party
to the transaction has the benefit of a specific authorization, it will be
necessary to rebut an allegation of gambling by arguing that the parties had
a legitimate business reason for entering into the transaction.  Baker &
McKenzie has stated that this risk is relatively low and are not aware of any
cases where such activity has been problematic.

 In addition, where the transaction constitutes an OTC financial futures
transaction (for example, a swap where the price is based on an interest rate
index quoted on a financial futures exchange in Japan), the transaction will
be regulated under the Financial Futures Trading Law (see below).

 Financial Futures Transactions.

 In summary, under the Financial Futures Trading Law, if Enron Japan wishes
to conduct financial futures brokerage business it must hold a license.  If
Enron Japan does not hold such a license, the counterparties with whom it may
conduct financial futures transactions will be limited to banks, securities
companies and members of a Financial Futures Exchange who are licensed as
financial futures brokers.  Financial futures transactions include the
following:

  (a) futures contracts in relation to currencies, etc. and listed options
with respect to currencies, etc.; and

  (b) OTC financial futures transactions.

 With regard to the question as to whether the trades that you engage in have
to be booked under Enron Japan Corp., or whether you can execute for Enron
Global Markets LLC, this is really a tax question for Susan Musch, who I have
copied on this e-mail.  My general understanding is that, so as not to
develop a permanent establishment for tax purposes, which could create tax
liabilities for an offshore entity conducting such activities, the trades
should be booked with Enron Japan Corp. This is subject to Susan's advice,
which will provide you further details and perhaps more sophisticated methods
to approach this issue.

 Looking forward to seeing you back in Japan.

 Best regards,

 John

	Darren Delage@ECT
	08/16/2000 12:13 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Glover, Jan-Erland
Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron Japan Trading and Enron Global Markets LLC Trading

Hello John,

As you know, I am looking at returning to Tokyo on temporary assignment
effective September 1 to support our efforts in Enron Japan as well as to
leverage the locational advantage for Financial trading (part of Enron Global
Markets LLC) From what I understood of our earlier conversations, there is
not a legal issue with entering into foreign exchange or fixed income trades
with another counterparty located in Tokyo, whether it be another US bank or
a Japanese bank.  Can you please generally confirm this?  Do the trades that
I engage in have to be booked under Enron Japan/ or can I execute for Enron
Global Markets LLC?

Sheila,
If the trades that I do in Japan have to be booked under Enron Japan, how
does the accounting work to effectively transfer P&l back to Gary's RC? (ie
how are we accounting for proprietary trading p&l in London office?) and are
there any nuances that I need to be aware of in the booking/implementation of
these trades

Jan,
 what information are you going to need from Sheila's group in order to be
comfortable with the transaction and accounting process? {either on
proprietary and/or on order flow originating either in Japan or abroad- ie an
Australian interest rate hedge that I conduct out of Japan

Sincerely,
Darren


Hello all,

Apologies for any delays, but Carrie is out sick.


<<FERC_File.csv>>  <<FERC_Table_Def.csv>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - FERC_File.csv
 - FERC_Table_Def.csv


Yes.  How's that for an answer.

I think you want to revise against this version, since this is the latest
version Lee has seen, then blackline against the 20th version.

THANKS!!!

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/30/2001 09:55:23 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration IIproject

No problem.  I left you a voice mail message.  This looks like the
agreement that I made these revisions to and sent to Carlos Sole (and
copied you on) on March 20.  That agreement deleted the agency
references, etc. and included Lee Johnson's changes to some of the
specific performasnce guarantees in Article 10.  It did not, however,
include turbine 28. Let me know if you want me to revise the atached
document or the one I sent to Carlos.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com; leff.johnson%ss.ps..ge.com@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration
IIproject

Hi Pete,

I have a fire drill for you.  This contract needs to between Salmon
Energy
LLC and GE, with no agency reference.  In other words, a CA Development
form.  Any chance of getting this today?

The delivery dates on one of the turbines will be changing, as is the
payment schedule.  Also, the designation of one of the turbines will
change.  Salmon will be receiving units 19, 20, 23 and 28 (a new one).

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
09:10
AM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/27/2001 01:19 PM

To:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay
      Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, scofer@llgm.com, tconstan@llgm.com
cc:   Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject:  GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
      project

Bill Williams has confirmed that the attached version of the LVC-2
contract
is the final form.  I have added a footer stamp identifying it as "Rev 5
-
3/27/01".  Everything else is identical to the draft circulated March
12.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)


Print job.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:19
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:46:03 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Christopher"
<christophercobb@akllp.com>

Subject: FW: Compared Document

Here is the blackline showing changes made from version 5.  Again, I
apologize for the delay.  As you can see, the blackline has deleted
certain section headings and internal section cites. I will have IT
debug version 6, so this shouldn't affect any future blacklines.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Gregory, Donnye
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 2:33 PM
> To: Lindo, Jacqueline E.
> Cc: Thompson, Peter J.
> Subject: Compared Document
>
> Here is your compared document.  I think that both versions of this
> document were corrupt.  We can talk later about fixing them.
> <<TEST_RED.DOC>>
 - TEST_RED.DOC


I'm serious.  Are you referring to the proposal that no one knows about that
everyone knows about?  We going to celebrate?

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/08/2001 06:27 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Can you be home

har har - don't tell though - I want it to be a surprise

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
> Sent:   Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 PM
> To:   Nancy Sellers
> Cc:   'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @ Berkeley
> Subject:   Re: Can you be home
>
>
> What's Sunday?  Would that be "frog gras?"
>
>
>
>
>                     Nancy Sellers
>
>                     <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Jeff
> Dasovich'"
>                     ndavi.com>
> <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
>
> <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
>                     05/08/2001 04:29 PM            <PSellers@pacbell.net>
>
>                                                    cc:
>
>                                                    Subject:     Can you be
> home
>
>
>
>
>
> for Sunday's dinner?  I think I will order some foie for myself!
>
> Nancy
> (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>
>
>
>


where are you going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	RE: Tenaska IV 11/01

Thanks.  Glad to know you are still here.  I'm not sure when I send an email now if the person on the other end is still here.  I will be leaving, though.  I've given two weeks notice.  I'll let you know who will be taking over this gem of an account.

Megan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Daren J.
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Parker, Megan
Subject:	RE: Tenaska IV 11/01

What's the big deal?  It's only one digit...But, if it will make you happy, I will fix it.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:57 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	RE: Tenaska IV 11/01

Can you look at this again?  I'm missing the 7 before the decimal point.

Megan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Daren J.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Parker, Megan
Subject:	RE: Tenaska IV 11/01

done.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	Tenaska IV 11/01

Darren:
It's that time again.  Please remove the price on deal 384258 for Nov and add a demand fee of $3,096,547.98.

Thanks,
Megan

 << File: 2001FuelMgmt Nov(12-11-01).xls >>


Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:09:37 -0500
From: "Jay Mccormick" <jmccormick@cajunusa.com>
To: "Richey Austin" <raustin@advancedaromatics.com>,	"Jerry Marcotte" <Jmarcotte33@aol.com>,<ChrisJ@cajunusa.com>,	<DaveM@cajunusa.com>, <MarkM@cajunusa.com>,	"Ponce Sauceda" <ponce.sauceda@stoltoffshore.cc>,	"Ty Wilson" <ltywilson@yahoo.com>, <rt_rev_mcc@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fw: try it, it works
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from smtp3.ev1.net	(smtpout.ev1.net [207.218.192.47])	by mail.cajunusa.com; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:35:12 -0500
Received: from default [207.218.216.137] by smtp3.ev1.net  (SMTPD32-6.06) id A79E15C400C6; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:34:22 -0500
Message-ID: <000e01b1dff1$767f9860$89d8dacf@default>
From: "RON LANDRY" <kajunron@ev1.net>
To: <LndryMj@aol.com>
Cc: "jay mccormick" <jmccormick@cajunusa.com>
Subject: Fw: try it, it works
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1988 00:08:25 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01B1DFBF.2A59F480"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Harter <atastn@bellsouth.net>
To: The Goetches <gocampers@aol.com>; Shaune Harter <shaune@dwave.net>; Ron
Landry <kajunron@ev1.net>; KOSCELNICK,JOHN P. <KOSCELJ@apci.com>;
Hippo@Enter.Net <hippo@enter.net>; Bubba McDonald <mcdonah@apci.com>; Bill
Fehling <wbf362@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:44 AM
Subject: try it, it works

 - Stephen King - the hand.doc


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are rescheduled/derated outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 102901R.xls


Attached are the consolidated Global standards reports for 12/20 and 12/21.

Nancy


Good news for Body Shop members! The Body Shop will reopen Monday, January 7, 2002. While we recognize that the Body Shop is a tremendous asset to all of our employees' health and wellness, we must reopen it without an Enron subsidy. Therefore, the membership fee will increase from $25 to $30 per month for all Enron employees and contractors. Spouse memberships will remain at $15 per month. Locker fees will remain at $10 per month and members may keep their current locker. (If you emptied your locker after the Body Shop closed in December, please notify the Body Shop reception desk that you would like to reoccupy it.)
The overall price increase, coupled with reduced expenses, will enable the Body Shop to reopen and remain open on a cash-neutral basis to meet creditors' requirements. Payroll deductions will be reactivated with the January 15th payroll and will include the increased fee. If you do not wish to continue your membership, please contact the Body Shop to cancel your membership via email only at <mailto:Body.Shop@enron.com>.  Membership information and enrollment forms can be accessed below:

The Body Shop's new hours will be 6:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 6:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. on Friday. Saturday hours are not offered at this time.
Although laundry service has been discontinued, towels will continue to be available for your convenience. Once the ongoing membership base and associated revenues have been stabilized to support staffing and housekeeping, exercise classes will be scheduled. We anticipate exercise classes to be available within a few weeks. Massage therapy services will continue and are available by appointment by calling extension 3-3047.
Whether you are a continuing member or considering new membership, there is no better time for you to take advantage of the Body Shop and to take care of your personal health and well being than right now, at the beginning of 2002.
Your continued support is greatly appreciated.


....This just in....

Here are our updated imbalances per contract & total:

 Historical Current Mth Cumul.
201K: (12.807)  (8.181)  (20.988)
202K: (13.951)  7.879  (6.072)
203K: (6.152)  (267)  (6.419)
204K: 27.392  (6.306)  21.088

Total: (5.516)  (6.875)  (12.391)
     Due Oasis


Vince - Thanks so much for the job description.  I forwarded it to our legal
counsel for their review, and they were very pleased with it.
They said it really helped them to understand what Vincent is actually doing,
which will enable them to better prepare his case.

Thanks again.

Candace

Vince J Kaminski
01/07/2000 12:20 PM
To: Candace Womack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vincent Tang

Candace,.

Sorry for additional delay. Editing took a long time.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:18 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/04/2000 12:11 PM
To: Candace Womack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vincent Tang

Candace,

Sorry for the delay. I shall edit the job description and forward it to you
later today.

Vince

Candace Womack
01/04/2000 11:24 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca Shelp <rshelp@tindallfoster.com>, "R. van Ravenswaay"
<rvanraven@ix.netcom.com>, Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vincent Tang

Vince - Will you please review the following job description which Tindall &
Foster has prepared, and edit it as needed for Vincent Tang's position?
We need this job description in order to proceed with the other steps
necessary in obtaining Vincent's green card.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this.  Thanks.

Candace
x30651

---------------------- Forwarded by Candace Womack/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
11:17 AM ---------------------------

Rebecca Shelp <rshelp@tindallfoster.com> on 12/28/99 02:07:34 PM
To: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace Womack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Reed <lreed@tindallfoster.com>
Subject: RE: Vincent Tang

I still do not have a job description for Vincent's position.  Maybe
Enron does not have one?

Candace, here is a sample job description.  Please check with Vincent's
supervisor on modifying this for the job description.  This was my best
guess, but I may be way off... If so, we have many other generic
examples to use instead.  Just let me know.

Generic title:  Operations Research Analyst (Alternate Titles Analyst
Operations Research; Research Analyst)
Overview:  Provides research support for specific projects and programs.
Essential Functions:
Projects may involve collecting and analyses data to formulate
recommendations, policies or solutions.
Marginal Functions:
May involve mathematical or simulation models of problem for solution by
computers or other methods: Analyzes problem in terms of information and
conceptualizes and defines problem.
Studies information and selects plan from competitive proposals that
affords maximum probability of profit or effectiveness in relation to
cost or risk.
Prepares model of problem in form of one or several equations that
relates constants and variables, restrictions, alternatives, conflicting
objectives and their numerical parameters.
Defines data requirements and gathers and validates information applying
judgment and statistical tests.
Specifies manipulative or computational methods to be applied to model.
Performs validation and testing of model to ensure adequacy, or
determines need for reformulation.
Prepares reports to management defining problem, evaluation, and
possible solution.
Evaluates implementation and effectiveness of research.
May design, conduct, and evaluate experimental operational models where
insufficient data exists to formulate model.
May specialize in research and preparation of contract proposals
specifying competence of organization to perform research, development,
or production work.
May develop and apply time and cost networks, such as Program Evaluation
and Review Techniques (PERT), to plan and control large projects.
May work in association with engineers, scientists, and management
personnel in business, government, health, transportation, energy,
manufacturing, environmental sciences or other technologies.

I look forward to your response.

Rebecca Shelp
Legal Assistant
Tindall & Foster, P.C.
600 Travis, Suite 2800
Houston, Texas 77002-3094
Telephone:  (713) 229-0636 ext. 101
Fax:             (713) 228-1303
Email:  rshelp@tindallfoster.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 02/07/2000
10:30 AM ---------------------------

troy_a_benoit@reliantenergy.com on 02/07/2000 10:19:10 AM
To: "Ami Chokshi" <Ami_Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: 8TH NOMS

(See attached file: HPL-Feb.xls)

 - HPL-Feb.xls


they are working it still

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	J&J Zufferli <jzufferli@shaw.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:11 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Re: car

I actually meant for employment :-)  that was the larger concern for me.

love, jess
----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Zufferli@enron.com>
To: <jzufferli@shaw.ca>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: RE: car

> subject to mechanical inspection from the Vancouver Porsche dealership.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   J&J Zufferli <jzufferli@shaw.ca>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:03 PM
>    To:     Zufferli, John
>    Subject:  car
>
>
>    The pictures are pretty sweetie.  Looks in  great shape.  Did you sign
>    the original documents today?
>
>    love, jess
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>


i am gonna drink like a kennedy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mena, Luis
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Meet the Pool, Venue change

I am gonna drink like Jenna Bush

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:11 PM
To:	Mena, Luis
Subject:	RE: Meet the Pool, Venue change

i am definately bringing back some talent to the stabbin cabin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mena, Luis
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Meet the Pool, Venue change

i'll be pissed if i don't tackle some clam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Mena, Luis
Subject:	RE: Meet the Pool, Venue change

i will be pissed if i can walk out of this party

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mena, Luis
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	FW: Meet the Pool, Venue change

now its a party

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Coleman, Jacqueline" <Jacqueline.Coleman@ENRON.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Coleman+2C+20Jacqueline+22+20+3CJacqueline+2EColeman+40ENRON+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Coleman, Jacqueline
Subject:	Meet the Pool, Venue change

The party is still on.

Due to the weather, the Pool party will be moved inside to the Imperial
Ballroom East, 3rd level of the Hyatt Regency.

see you there!


Dave Adams' phone number iw 612-373-5388

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Probably not, my sister is in town.


Enjoy!
 - 20011124ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011124ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


Phillip,
I'll be down in about twenty minutes.
Zac


We are doing a gag gift exchange.  Usually it is pretty good, so try and bring something.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: Christmas Party

what date is this planned for. BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: Christmas Party

We would love to have you and Kim.  Might even be some snow by then.  Just let me know if you can make it so they can get a good head count.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: Christmas Party

I think we should still do this, and I may join you guys.

BT

Dates please.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Christmas Party

FYI

We are planning on joining Crestone for a combined Denver Christmas party.  The cost for our share will be approximately $1,000.  I know it is not cheap, but I think it is an important signal and morale booster which is critical at this time.  We have a long way to go in this deal.


Per Terry at Gas Control - there will be no over injections for 11/1/01.

Kelly M. Loocke
Enron North America
713-853-3570
pager:  877-872-7966


You have been  invited to attend the above-referenced meeting on Wednesday, February 6, 2002 at 9:00 a.m. in ECS 05116.

Ren?e Ingram Carter
713-853-4866


Here are the changes I sent to Alan.

----- Forwarded by Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 04:40 PM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	02/15/2001 03:18 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Here are the final changes for the EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Kaye Ellis
EB3876A
713-853-5968


Ed's cell  816  719  3095


John,

You might recall we spoke a few weeks ago about a system with more
intelligence for out-of-hours trading than just leaving the products on Last
Trade is Mid.

Attached is a suggestion for how such a system might work. It builds on
Offset to Last Trade functionality.

The simplified description is: It tracks two variables: Intensity(Speed) and
Bias (Buy or Sell emphasis).  As Intensity increases, the Spread increases.
As Bias increases, the Offset increases.

I'll call later to see what you think of the idea.

Dave

Program Criteria

The formula which defines the trading decision-making program will need to
work with several criteria/inputs/definitions. These might be:

Intensity (Speed) - The average time between transaction attempts, regardless
of whether they are buys or sells. Measured as a moving average over the last
[Intensity Factor] transactions by comparing the timestamp of the transaction
Tibco messages for the Product.
Obviously, the lower the Intensity calculation, the higher the transaction
flow. Therefore a high Intensity number indicates low transaction flow.
Intensity Factor - The number of transactions to be included in the moving
average Intensity calculation. A possible value for this might be [4].
#Buys - The number of Buys which have occurred.
#Sells - The number of Sells which have occured.
Transaction Count - Could be either #Buys or #Sells (whichever last occured).}
Buy Offset - The Offset value which will be applied if a Buy occurs.
Sell Offset - The Offset value which will be applied if a Sell occurs.
Offset Reversion Ratio (ORR)- The amount by which the Buy Offset should be
reduced if a Sell occurs (or amount Sell Offset should be reduced if a Buy
occurs). A possible value for this might be [0.3]. If the application of the
ORR results in a reduction of less than 1, then the reduction shall be 1.
Transaction Reversion Ratio (TRR)- The amount by which #Buys should be
reduced if a Sell occurs (or amount #Sells should be reduced if a Buy
occurs). A possible value for this might be [0.3]. If the application of the
TRR results in a reduction of less than 1, then the reduction shall be equal
to 1.
Spread Minimum - The minimum Spread value allowed. A possible value for this
might be [0.04]
Spread Maximum - The maximum Spread value allowed. A possible value for this
might be [0.50]
Offset Minimum - The minimum Offset allowed for both Buys and Sells. A
possible value for this might be [0].
Offset Maximum -The maximum offset allowed for both Buys and Sells. A
possible value for this might be [0.50]
Initial Offset - The Buy and Sell Offset used when the program is started
Initial Spread - The Spread used when the program is started
Spread-Offset Minimum - The minimum amount by which Spread must exceed
Offset. Prevents a possible arbitrage opportunity for the customer. A
possible value for this might be [0.01]
Dead Interval - The period of time which must pass before the program will
recalculate the above Criteria, if no transactions have taken place during
the Dead Interval. A possible value for this might be [240] seconds.

Program Outputs

The program should output the following variables as a result of combining
the above Criteria in a user-defined Formula:

Spread (integer) - as per current Stack Manager
Offset (integer) - as per current Stack Manager
Suspension (boolean) - Whether or not the Product should be suspended.
Normally "False"

Program Interface and Operation Principles

The user should be provided with a GUI which will allow them to define a
relationship among the above Criteria, which will produce and apply the
Outputs to a particular Product. This relationship would be defined with
Intensity Formulas and Transaction Formulas.

Every time a Transaction occurs, or a Dead Interval passes, the Criteria will
be recalculated and the user-defined formulas will be reviewed by the
program. If a Dead Interval passes without any transactions taking place,
then Intensity = Intensity +240 and #Buys=#Buys-TRR and #Sells=#Sells-TRR and
Buy Offset = Buy Offset- ORR and Sell Offset = Sell Offset - ORR.

If the user-defined Formulas (see following) indicate that a change in spread
should occur, then if the Offset is zero (in the case of a trade occurring)
or if no trade has occured (during the passing of a Dead Interval), the
system shall perform a Last Trade is Mid calculation around the last
transaction, adjusting the buy and sell prices according to the new Spread
value.

Any adjustment to the Spread shall respect the Spread-Offset Minimum. If a
reduction in the Spread should violate the Spread-Offset Minimum, then the
Buy Offset (or Sell Offset, or both as appropriate) shall be reduced
accordingly. Similarly, if the Offset is increased by a Transaction Formula
to a level greater than the Spread, the Spread shall be increased to maintain
the Spread-Offset Minimum.

GUI/Formulas Example:

Constants
Intensity Factor: [4]
Dead Interval: [240]
Offset Reversion Ratio (ORR): [0.3]
Transaction Reversion Ratio (TRR): [0.3]
Spread Minimum [0.04]
Spread Maximum [0.50]
Offset Minimum [0]
Offset Maximum [0.49]
Spread-Offset Minimum [0.01]

         INPUTS           OUTPUTS
Intensity Formula
Formula # Intensity   Spread Offset  Suspension
S1  >220   -0.01 n/a F
S2  <30   +0.01 n/a F
S3  <10   +0.02 n/a F

Transaction Formula
Formula # # Transactions  Spread Offset  Suspension
V1  <4   n/a -0.01 F
V2  >3   n/a +0.01 F
V3  >5   +0.01 +0.02 F
V4  >10   +0.02 +0.04 F
V5  >15   +0.04 +0.15 F
V6  >20   n/a n/a T

Note that #Transactions would be #Buys or #Sells, as appropriate. Note also
that #Buys and #Sells are not intended to be an absolute count, but rather
are a moving measure of the number of buys or sells which have recently
occured.

In this example, all Constants and Formulae are editable by the user through
the GUI.

Simulation

Obviously, if we want to proceed, we will want to conduct several simulations
to prove concepts and evaluate responsiveness. However, to give some idea of
how the above might work when a market starts to run in a particular
direction, please see the attached:

Additional Features

System Notifications

There should be two kinds of notifications for the Robotrader, which will be
similar to Stack Manager Garbage Checks: Warning and Failure levels for both
Offset and Price. The warning levels will trigger a pager message. The
Failure levels will trigger a pager message and the product will be
automatically suspended. The Price checks will be against prices input by the
trader (not relative price movements, but actual price). There should be both
maximum and minimum price checks (e.g. gas is trading at $5.50. The
notification levels could be $8 at the top end and $2 at the bottom end).
Offset checks will only be against a maximum value.

Dave


When: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US
& Canada).
Where: TBA

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


John, I am going to be in Los Angeles on Monday and Tuesday to attend to a
family matter.  If you make a decision on the position during that time
please feel free to give me a call on my cell 702-0463


Should these not be converted to ENA - IM Texas ???  Some time ago - we were
told this desk was dead and the existing deals would end.  This desk is not
included in any Texas desk portfolios.

The ECT desks are supposed to be inactive - however - these deals keep
rolling - and
someone created some new ones?   If the desk is active - should we change it
to ENA - IM Waha -
as ECT is no more ???


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 10/16/2000
04:27 PM ---------------------------

10/16/2000 02:12 PM
Nancy Bagot
Nancy Bagot
Nancy Bagot
10/16/2000 02:12 PM
10/16/2000 02:12 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Options filing

Shelley, once the filing is made at the Commission, I will hand deliver
copies to the following (all are pre-filing meeting attendees, along with Bob
Flanders who set up the OMTR/policy meeting):  Bob Flanders, Ed Murrell,
Laurel Hyde, Kim Bruno, Kathleen Dias, Demi Pulas, Mike Coleman, Bob
Petrocelli and John Carlson.

PLEASE NOTE that I will be at a technical conference at FERC tomorrow.  All
additions or questions about the filing should go to Mike Van Norden
[202-466-9148].

I will be available via beeper at 800-346-3310.

-Nancy


State has only signed up 500 MW according to this article

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:57 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	02/14/2001 08:11 AM

		 To: <rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: California Governor Requests Additional $500 Million to Buy
Energy

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Wed, 14 Feb
2001 08:00:19 -0600 -----
To:	"Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	California Governor Requests Additional $500 Million to Buy Energy
California Governor Requests Additional $500 Million to Buy Energy
Dion Nissenbaum , San Jose Mercury News, Calif.

( February 14, 2001 )

Feb. 14--SACRAMENTO, Calif.--As Gov. Gray Davis works to craft a bailout plan
for California's two largest electric utilities, California's fledgling foray
into the power business is coming at an ever more expensive price that is
nearing $2 billion.

For the second time in about a week, the Davis administration alerted
lawmakers Tuesday that it needs another $500 million to buy energy on the
costly short-term market while negotiators try to work out long-term
contracts with power suppliers.

That brings the two-month state price tag to about $2 billion, far exceeding
early estimates that California would have to spend about $1 billion to
launch its energy buying program. The news has left some lawmakers worried
that the state is burning through money without making enough progress in
resolving the underlying problems.

With the bills piling up, Davis is looking to present Southern California
Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric with a plan by week's end to rescue the
two companies edging ever closer to bankruptcy. The state was forced to start
buying power because the two utilities have exhausted their credit.

For now, the governor's advisers appear to have decided on state ownership of
the utility transmission lines as the foundation of any deal, according to
sources involved in the negotiations.

In a Tuesday press conference, Davis said he has not settled on transmission
lines, but wants to make sure that the state gets something in return for
rescuing the companies.

"What I will propose, hopefully this Friday, will not be a bailout, it will
be a buyout," Davis said.

Buying the transmission lines has become the most-favored option in the
Capitol in recent days as what one consumer activist called the "crown jewel"
of any solution. A state Senate committee formally embraced the idea Tuesday
by approving a bare-bones bill that encourages Davis to buy the transmission
lines as part of any utility deal.

Several issues must be settled before a transmission line deal is final. It
still isn't clear what the lines are worth, or whether the utilities will
have to pay capital gains taxes on the lines if they sell them to the state.
And under the law, the federal government may have veto power over any
transmission line deal. But negotiators expressed confidence they can resolve
those issues.

However, the state is still struggling to put together low-cost, long-term
contracts with power companies that are essential to keeping electric bills
close to current levels.

When legislators gave Davis the power last month to sign the energy deals,
they set aside $500 million to tide the state over until it could get the
contracts in place. That came on top of another $1 billion from other funds
that have been used to buy energy that now costs about $45 million a day.

California won't be able to stop spending so much until it signs enough
long-term contracts. But negotiations have been plodding along and so far the
state has managed to come up with only about 500 megawatts -- enough to power
a half million homes.

"I am starting to get concerned about the pace at which they appear to be
entering into contracts," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Santa Cruz. "It is
slow and there don't appear to be many of them."

Davis has released few details about the contracts, but has expressed
optimism that his negotiators will be able to put together enough deals to
solve the problems.

"No one ever expected this to be a slam dunk because it's a tough
negotiation," said Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio. "But we're making
progress."

Ultimately, the state is supposed to be reimbursed for its mounting
expenditures in the spot market, under terms of a $10 billion power-buying
bond bill approved by the legislature two weeks ago. The treasurer's office
intends to sell the first of those bonds in May, and their proceeds will be
transferred to the state general fund.

Later bond issues will generate money to be used for the long-term contracts.

Bond investors will be repaid by utility ratepayers, but it is not yet clear
whether that will involve a rate increase.

Staff writers Cheryl Devall, Mark Gladstone, Chris O'Brien and Hallye Jordan
contributed to this report.

-----

To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper,
go to http://www.sjmercury.com

(c) 2001, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune
Business News.


I don't use the start menu to access my pipeline EBB which is what I think this is.  But I do go to this website on the internet
	==>    http://escript.dom.com/

to access the Dominion EBB.  Dominion used to be called CNG.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deluca, Bryan
Sent:	Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:54 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Request from Application Integration
Importance:	High

My name is Bryan DeLuca, and I am with the Application Integration Team.  We are doing a routine maintenance and are wondering if you are still using the Energy Scheduling Weblinks CNG program? You will find this program under the start menu \ programs \ Business Applications.

Please reply back to this email letting us now if you ARE, or ARE NOT using the Energy Scheduling Weblinks Cng program anymore. If you are not using this program anymore it will be removed.

Thank you for your time,
Bryan A. DeLuca
Application Integration Team


I wont harass you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

not sure.  why?  so you can harass me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you coming to the front porch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are killing me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whatever, I understand your embarrasment in getting caught

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

will you get it in your little skull that this time it was a guy.  that's why i immediately asked you.  and how would you know if i was staring, which i wasn't, unless you were?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

would you stop lying about the guy, Im not going to hold it against you for staring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that you want the male looker to come

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

just you baby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Can i bring your male admirer?


Mark,  Attached are drafts of the confirms.  Please review and if acceptable,
please forward.  Sorry for the delay.


The location of the meeting is 3AC 14C2.  If you have any questions feel free
to give me a call.

Shelly Escamilla
646-6246
---------------------- Forwarded by Grisela Escamilla/NA/Enron on 07/18/2000
10:04 AM ---------------------------

Patrick Hansen
07/18/2000 09:58 AM
To: Monica Talan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn
Aven/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Mills@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor@ECT, Julie Ramos/SA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Leonardo
Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Grisela Escamilla/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Meeting of Friday at 8:00 am

Please confirm your assistance to an EOL Argentina meeting to be held on
Friday 21, at 8:00 am, in Houston office.
We will confirm the meeting location soon.
Thank you.

Patrick


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Exchange Information <Marketing@NYMEX.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	Exchange Information
Subject:	(01-398) CORRECTION: REMINDER ON EFS REQUIREMENTS FOR NATURAL GAS	 FUTURES

December 4, 2001
Notice No. 01-398

TO:		NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
		NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:		J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

SUBJECT:	CORRECTION: REMINDER ON EFS REQUIREMENTS FOR NATURAL GAS
FUTURES
____________________________________________________________________________
_____

Previously, in Notice to Members #01-366, the Exchange announced a new
program that commenced on November 1, 2001 and that permits the exchange of
swaps for futures in Natural Gas futures contracts.  As an informational
follow-up to that notice, this notice includes the text of this EFS rule.

				AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 6.21A

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

 Rule 6.21A.  EXCHANGE OF FUTURES FOR, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, SWAP
TRANSACTIONS  (Pilot Program)

(A) (1) An exchange of futures for, or in connection with, a swap (EFS)
consists of two discrete, but related, transactions; a swap transaction and
a futures transaction.  At the time such transaction is effected, the buyer
and seller of the futures must be, respectively, the seller and the buyer of
the swap.  The swap component shall involve the commodity underlying the
futures contract (or a derivative, by-product or related product of such
commodity).  The quantity covered by the swap must be approximately
equivalent to the quantity covered by the futures contracts.  The swap
component of an EFS transaction must comply with the applicable CFTC swap
regulatory requirements.  The initial term of the pilot program shall be
three years from the effective date of this Rule 6.21A.

	(2) Eligible Contracts and Transactions.  EFS transactions may be
effected only for transactions in the Exchange's Brent crude oil futures
contract  * or in the Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract (for a period
of six months following implementation of the pilot program for Natural Gas
EFS transactions) * .

(B)(1)  The report of an EFS transaction shall be given on the Floor of the
Exchange during the hours of futures trading.  (2) EFS transactions *
involving the Brent contract * are permitted until the close of trading on
the last trading day in the expiring contract month [of the applicable
contract(s)].  * (3) EFS transactions involving Natural Gas contract are
permitted until two hours after trading terminates on the last day of
trading in the expiring contract month. *

(C)  A report of such EFS transaction shall be submitted to the Exchange by
each Clearing Member representing the buyer and/or seller.  Such report
shall identify the EFS as made under this Rule and shall contain the
following information: a statement that the swap component of the EFS
complied with the applicable CFTC swap regulatory requirements at the time
the EFS was entered into between the buyer and seller, a statement that the
EFS has resulted or will result in a change of payments or other such
change, the kind and quantity of the futures, the price at which the futures
transaction is to be cleared, the names of the Clearing Members and
customers and such other information as the Exchange may require.  Such
report (form) shall be submitted to the Compliance Department by 12:00 noon,
no later than two (2) Exchange business days after the day of posting the
EFS on the Floor of the Exchange.

(D)(1) Each buyer and seller must satisfy the Exchange, at its request, that
the transaction is a legitimate EFS transaction.  Upon the request of the
Exchange, all documentary evidence relating to the EFS, including a master
swap agreement and any supplements thereto, shall be obtained by the
Clearing Members from the buyer or seller and made available by the Clearing
Members for examination by the Exchange.  Additionally, if the buyer or
seller is a Member/Member Firm, the Exchange may obtain the information
directly from such person(s).

(2) For [all NYMEX Division contracts] * the Brent contract *, no EFS that
is linked to or contingent upon entry into a second, offsetting swap
transaction may be transacted during Regular Trading Hours at any time that
NYMEX offers trading in its contracts, unless trading in a market is halted,
such as during a physical emergency.   * For the Natural Gas contract, no
EFS that is linked to or contingent upon entry into a second, offsetting
swap transaction may be transacted at any time. *

(3)	Failure by a buyer or seller, or its Clearing Member to satisfy the
Exchange that an EFS transaction is bona fide shall subject such buyer or
seller, if a Member/Member Firm, or the Clearing Member to disciplinary
action.  Such disciplinary action, depending on the gravity of the offense,
may be deemed to be a major offense of the Exchange's rules.  Further, if
the buyer or seller is not a Member/Member Firm, the Exchange may conduct a
hearing before the Business Conduct Committee to limit, condition or deny
access to the market.

(E) Each EFS transaction shall be posted by the Floor Members and cleared
through the Exchange in accordance with normal procedures and by the
Clearing Members involved.

(F)  All omnibus accounts and foreign brokers shall submit a signed EFS
reporting agreement in the form prescribed by the Exchange to the Exchange's
Compliance Department.  Such Agreement shall provide that any omnibus
account or foreign broker identified by a Clearing Member (or another
omnibus account or foreign broker) as the buyer or seller of an EFS pursuant
to Rule 6.21A(C), shall supply the name of its customer and such other
information as the Exchange may require.  Such information shall be
submitted to the Exchange's Compliance Department by 12:00 noon no later
than two (2) Exchange business days after the day of posting the EFS on the
Floor of the Exchange.  Failure by an omnibus account or foreign broker to
submit either the agreement or the particular EFS information to the
Exchange may result in a hearing by the Business Conduct Committee to limit,
condition or deny access of such omnibus account or foreign broker to the
market.


Kay:

Attached are copies of the Salmon promissory note to PPL and the Security
Agreement.  Greg says a Financing Statement is coming from Freshfields.
Greg asked for an ENA letter similar to the GE letter to be signed at escrow
funding agreeing to the execution of these forms at closing.  I will
duplicate the GE letter.  I'm still waiting on his and Isabel's response to
our proposal re the escrow.  Greg advises that the additional language on
the Turbine Contract should be coming shortly.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Lang, Gregory F. [mailto:gregorylang@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:03 AM
To: 'ccampbell@kslaw.com'
Cc: 'iparker@freshfields.com'; 'lisa.obrien@freshfields.com'
Subject: Salmon Security Agreement and Inter-Company Note

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 12:03:14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:
Subject:
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:12:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0C8EA.DC921EC0"

 - ATT537097.txt
 - ATT537098.htm
 - Salmon Security Agreement.doc
 - Salmon Intercompany Note.DOC


I'm not sure I understand it.  I wonder if they mean payment in full has been
made as of the time of the assignment.

I'm clearing some other stuff off my desk so I can get to this, hopefully
this afternoon.

Kay

To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Contract Verbage

Kay:

The last sentence of this clause was not included in my last draft.   After
being on vacation for four days, I can't remember why I did or didn't do
what.   Please let me know if you agree that this last sentence should be
added and if there are any other changes needed.

Thanks.
Kathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 09:30 AM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/30/2000 11:48:23 AM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, Kathleen.Clark@enron.com
cc: karla.hesketh@us.abb.com

Subject: Enron Contract Verbage

Dear Team,
Dave mentioned that probably the only other change would be in the assignment
section article xxii and that should not be any big change.

MIKE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O
Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on 06/30/2000 11:44 AM
---------------------------
|------------->
|(Embedded    |
|image moved  |
|to file:     |
|pic05234.pcx)|
|             |
|------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Frank Chmiel/StLouis/USTRA/ABB                                          |
  |06/30/2000 11:38 AM (Phone: +(314) 679-4702, Dept.: FIELD SALES)        |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------|

To:   Michael O Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
cc:   Karla Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, David
      Onuscheck/ETI/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
Subject:  Enron Contract Verbage

Security Level:?         Internal

Mike,
     When  we  spoke  this morning, Dave advised that one change to the
language
that  will  be  required is  the addition of the words in red , in bold added
by
ABB at the end of this paragraph in section 22.2 of the contract.

     In  the  case of an assignment to a party described in (ii), (vi), or
(vii)
(other  than   Enron  Engineering  &  Construction  or  NEPCO),  Seller shall
be
entitled  to  request  and  receive  an  appropriate guaranty, letter of
credit,
payment  bond  or  other  reasonable  form of payment security, in amount not
to
exceed the amount of the Purchase Amount remaining to be paid at the time of
the
assignment,  unless  the  assignor  agrees  to  remain  liable  for  all
future
liabilities  under  this  Agreement.  A letter of guaranty, letter of credit,
or
payment bond provided by an entity rated BBB+ or better shall be deemed to be
an
appropriate  form  of  security  for  the purpose of this provision , so long
as
payment  in  full  has  been  made  in accordance with the schedule set forth
in
Article VI.

     Additional commentary may come later today when Dave reaches his first
stop
on his flight back to Raliegh.
     Frank

 - pic05234.pcx


Mr. Kean:

I assume that you have received my letter and enclosed information of
November 14.

If that material prompted any questions, I will answer them promptly.

I hope that with your continuing involvement that we can fund some of these
scholarships through the generosity of Enron executives such as yourself.

Thanks for your continuing interest.

C.MacDowell


Jeff,

Please pass this note onto whomever on the call asked the question "what
would Enron be paid if there was an electricity curtailment?"

I talked with staff on the West Desk and confirmed that if there is an
unscheduled electricity curtailment (i.e., rolling or widespread blackout)
power scheduled by EES to a retail customer would still flow, assuming it had
been prescheduled.  EPMI (acting as EES's scheduling coordinator, or SC)
would be paid the ISO decremental  (dec) price for that power.  EPMI would
pass that revenue (along with the cost of supplying that power) onto EES.

If the blackout continued for some time (i.e., days), presumably EES would
adjust its preschedule and there would be no net sales into the ISO.

Whether the retail customer gets a payment for being curtailed depends
completely on the contract between EES and the customer.  Presumably the
force majure provisions of the contract would protect EES from utility
blackouts.

Alan Comnes


Several changes have been made to Stack Manager and the website. These changes are outlined below and will be visible by all as of Monday September 3, 2001.

Stack Manager Changes

Activate/Inactivate Stack - This functionality allows the trader to pull a product's prices from the website without suspending the product. If the Top of Stack limit order functionality is activated for a particular product this should be used to pull the stack prices from the website without pulling the entire product; therefore, if there are top of stack limit orders against the product they will remain visible and transactable on the website.

If a product's stack is inactivated the font for that product will be grayed out in stack manager. If the stack is active it will appear in black font.

To use this feature, select the product, right click and choose "Inactivate Stack". When you are ready to reactivate your prices, select the same product, right click again and choose "Activate Stack". There are also icons on the tool bar at the top of your screen which will Activate/Inactivate the stack of the highlighted product. See screen shot below for the icons.

Changes to Product Properties - Currently when modifications are made to certain properties within the product properties screen, the product will be suspended and pulled from the website. Now instead of being suspended, the product's stack will become inactive. Once the changes have been made and saved to the properties of a product simply click the Activate Stack icon as discussed above.

Website Change

Restrictions on Top of Stack orders - If Top of Stack limit orders are allowed on a product, but the trader is not showing both a bid and offer, limit orders will not be able to be placed on that product.

If you have any questions please call me at 31787. Thanks.

Savita

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


Surprise! You've just received a Yahoo! Greeting
from "Mike" (msable@sdge.com)!

To view this greeting card, click on the following
Web address at anytime within the next 60 days.

http://greetings.yahoo.com/greet/view?8CECCYIV7X62H

If that doesn't work, go to http://greetings.yahoo.com/pickup and
copy and paste this code:

8CECCYIV7X62H

Enjoy!

The Yahoo! Greetings Team

-------------------------
Yahoo! Greetings is a free service. If you'd like to send someone a
Yahoo! Greeting, you can do so at http://greetings.yahoo.com/

Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://rd.yahoo.com/mktg/greetings/txt/confirmation/tagline/?http://personals.yahoo.com


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001 10:18 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	07/12/2001 11:37 AM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today Thursday July 12 2001

(see attached file:  rt010712.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010712.pdf


This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight.  Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 11pm and may continue to be unavailable until 1 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed.  Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time.

Blackberry users:  Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes.

If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.


Per our conversation, below is the info you requested:

Counterparty: InterGen Energy North America,   909 Fannin Ste. 2222, Houston,
Texas 77010   Attn: Dave Rogers

Scope: The scope of our discussions will encompass, at the minimum physically
connecting to Intergen's 1100 MW Deweyville power plant to the A/S line and
executing monthly transactions, and at the other end of the spectrum,
connecting to their plant and tolling our gas on a long term arrangement.

Information Flow: The info flow will be "bi-directional" and will range from
pure engineering info relative to our pipe specs to notional price
information.

 We would like to have our first meeting with Intergen next week so please
let me know if there is any other information you will need to prepare a C/A.


Diana,

         Can you point out a deal number of which we are talking about and
you have a problem with.
         (maybe between EAST and WEST).

         In general desk-to desk deals don't get scheduled which means there
won't be any
         schedule changes.

          Thanks,
          Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Symes, Kate; Pate, Brett
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report

Thanks for the quick response!  So how do we get from today to being able to
capture desk to desk deals with all schedule changes?

Diana

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT
To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report

    Hi Diana & Kate,

    You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be
able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage,
    if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes
insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which
    Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things
like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month.

   Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation)
data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with
   Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule
data should be very much the same with all the changes
   in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and
liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and
   it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain
data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation
   the same data from 4/2/1996.

   Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule
between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule
   (liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid
confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format
   of the header for Region, nothing else.

   Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: Forward Obligation Report

Kroum,

I was running the new version of the Obligation Report.  I was not included
in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still
not doing what the "fix" was initiated for.  Originally, my discussions with
Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any
changes made in Deal Scheduling and  2.  All Desk to Desk deals.  Number
(2),   I believe was the difficult one.  When selecting the option on "Show
Deals"  in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate".
This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to
Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes.  Please
contact me for further discussion.  I apologize for not participating and
wasting your time.

Sincerely,

Diana Scholtes
(503) 464-3807

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question

Good afternoon, IT Wizards -

I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now
possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In
the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my
desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed
to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the
difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a
chance.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Attached is Sara Shackleton's Report.

Kaye


I don't know what he is going to do.  I hope that they start Simms, not
because Applewhite is bad but because Simms needs some time to develop.
Although, I think that Mack is going to stay with his 2 QB system because of
pride.

Nick Hiemstra
09/18/2000 04:55 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME WEDNEDSDAY @ 7:00

I was sweating in the 3rd qtr. when we were down 17-14.  What do you think
they'll do about the QB situation?

I do have to say, our QB question has definitely been answered.  I just hope
our defense can hold up.  The Tech and Colorado games should be good guides.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           09/18/2000 04:44 PM

To: Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME WEDNEDSDAY @ 7:00

now, now - you didn't look that great against UTEP.  we will see what happens
once we settle on a qb

Nick Hiemstra
09/18/2000 04:33 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME WEDNEDSDAY @ 7:00

The question is:  could you guys take San Jose State?  What happened to the
running game?


Luchas,

The firm contracts for the following pipelines have either been rejected, permanently released or have been recalled. Enron no longer has capacity entitlements with these pipelines and the contracts (corresponding paths) should be removed from the transportation book.

NGPL
Kern
El Paso
Tennessee
National Fuel
MRT
PG&E, NW (PGT)
Northern Border (NBPL)
Transco

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks
Maria Martinez (Garza)
713-853-7019


For The Week of Tuesday, November 20, 2001
50% of Americans live without a proper Dental Plan.  Even if you already have some form of dental insurance, you need to consider CAREINGTON  MULTI-CARE  This health plan SAVES YOU MONEY on your out-of-pocket health care costs whether or not you have insurance.  And, it can SAVE YOU MONEY on care not covered by your insurance.
ENROLL TODAY for $2,000 in Air and Cruise Discounts -free!
30 Day Money-Back Guarantee

Dental Plan      Savings Up to 70%  Pre-Existing Conditions Included  Cosmetic Procedures Included  	Prescription Plan Up to 13% off brand prescription drugs Up to 50% off generic drugs Mail-Order Program for maintenance drugs Discounts on vitamins and over-the counter drugs
Vision Plan Savings Up to 50% on eyewear Lasik Surgery Included Contact Lenses Included  Eye Exams Included  	Chiropractic Care Up to 50% Savings  Hearing Aids Free Exams 15% discounts

NO BENEFIT LIMITS --- PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS ACCEPTED NO CLAIM FORMS
-- NO WAITING PERIOD

The individual rate of $14.49 per month covers all Five benefits for you AND your family. Plus, save an extra 25% when you purchase an annual membership for only $129-A VALUE OF THREE MONTHS FREE!  Enroll before November 25, 2001 and receive certificates worth up to $2,000 in Air and Cruise Discounts, good through 2003, absolutely FREE
.
GUARANTEED ACCEPTANCE
30 Day Money-Back Guarantee
FREE - $2,000 in Air and Cruise Discounts

You risk nothing by enrolling now, review the plan in the comfort of your home for a full 30 days, make an appointment and use the plan.  If you are not completely thrilled with your savings, you may cancel for a full refund of your plan dues, your Air and Cruise Certificates are yours to keep!
______________________________________________________
Important subscription information
Your privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this offer because you are a registered subscriber to one of our sites or one of our affiliate sites and have requested to receive recurring mailings. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience with offers that include valuable discounts, bargains, special offers, sweepstakes, entertainment, travel and financial opportunities. However, if you feel you have received this message in error or if you wish to unsubscribe, please see the remove instructions at the end of this message.
Thank you for reading our special offers! Please forward this deal alert along to your friends. Have a great day!!!
* This email has been sent to you as a subscriber of MediaTrec.com
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to: http://65.161.31.202/r/r.asp?lid=25
* Enter your email address in the field provided and click "Unsubscribe".


You may think you've seen this, but don't be so sure.  There's lots of good
stuff on this one - takes a while to see it all, but worth it (probably only
if you're Republican, though!).  Be sure to click on "Palm Beach Pokey,"
"GORinch," and the other links at the top of the page.

Have a great weekend!  SRS

 - Dancin Dubya.htm


FYI. SoCalGas is filing in favor of the decision adopting the settlement.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:12 PM
To:	Mark Baldwin (E-mail); Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Donoho, Lindy; Dasovich, Jeff; Pryor, Tony; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Lokey, Teb
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	GIR Conf. Call

A Conference call to discuss any comments we may want to make on the CPUC's Proposed Decision in the GIR Proceeding has been scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2001 at 11:00 AM Houston/Omaha time and 9:00 AM California time.  The dial-in # is 1-877-795-3687 code: 350955.  In Houston, Conf. Rm. 1336 has been reserved for the call.


no, our contact is out of the office today.  i have received my first "we can do business with ena".  that response was oxy.  i have requested they email me their gisb so we can be ready to transact.  are we serious about selling the gas?  or are we just trying to get price quotes?
robin

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Barbe, Robin
Subject: RE: potential buyers for the bridgeline gas

Thanks.  Do you know if we've heard back from Oneok?
Chip Schneider

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Tuesday 12/28/99
9:00am   Aspiration biopsy with specimen collection hematology.

Wed 12/29/99
7:00 am  CT scan without oral preparation
10:00am Bone scan dosage
12:00pm Bone scan examination

Thur 12/30/99

4:00 pm  appointment with Dr. Lee Jin Soo

There you go.


Tana;

Bonavista Petroleum Ltd. is NOT authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit.

***********************
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC -- no change to profile -- authorized
to trade power.

NOTE:  I spoke with Massachusetts Electric Company -- they are a distribution
company and are not FERC authorized to sell power.  So, I'm making a note
that this CP should NOT be authorized to trade US power.

Leslie


A new Kudlow Commentary has been published on Kudlow.com. As a subscriber, you may click the hyperlink below, login, and view the latest commentary. AOL Users please note, you may need to copy and paste the hyperlink into your web browser.

Thank You,

Kudlow & Company, LLC.

http://www.kudlow.com/members/login.asp?To=Content&ContentID=365


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	remaining books

The only books that should still have deals in them, other than NG-Price, will be

Intra-Ont-Cad		all canadian gas daily deals
NGPR-Can
Oil-NG-Spec
Ft-Ont-Central		all consolidated price/basis deals

these books will still have to be calculated after today.

All counterparty deals were moved over the weekend but any remaining desk to desk deals were not touched.  We need to move those ourselves today.
All others need to be calculated and officialized one more time today then inactivated on the Rac website for tomorrow.

KK


The meeting with Peco will be at 1:00pm in 3125b.  Thanks
Ben


Terry,  Attached is a PSA form we have used before with the perspective of
Enron as buyer.  Probably a little more detailed than we need for this one
since the facilities are only estimated at $200,000. Kennedy Oil is Seller
and Enron Midstream Services, L.L.C. is Buyer.

Some further detail on the site lease agreement:

CounterParty is Black Hills Trucking, Inc
Initial 1 year term, then month to month up to 2 years total
Fee $800/month
Black Hill will provide phone and electricity service hookup and Enron to
reimburse
Enron will directly pay phone and electricity bills
Area is approximately  250 ft. X 400 ft. and is fenced off separately
Include is existing 40 ft. X 40 ft. building on site.
Enron reserve right to install any other building reasonably necessary for
site to function as an equipment laydown yard
Enron reserve right to install septic system for bathroom in buildings used
by Enron
Enron needs access at all times through Black Hills front gate to get to site.
Enron will remove all equipment and buildings (except existing) upon
termination.