I will be circulating the report below weekly.  Please let me know if you
would prefer not to be on the distribution list.

Information Management Weekly Milestones Report ) 1/26/01

Portal.
? Business Analyst presented IM Survey Results Report to technical team.
Report shows what Business Units/Functional Units need to access from a
portal.

? Based on BA report, technical team is developing a prototype portal to show
the User Experience team for &look and feel8 input.

? Monty Myers joined the task force to represent portal development efforts
for EES.  Challenges to access corp driven information from EES have been
identified.

? myhome.enron.com targeted as choice portal name.

? Kathy Schultea will handle Andrea Yowman,s responsibilities for portal
security development.

Unstructured Data Management/Enterprise Search Engine tool.
? The three competing products are Autonomy, Verity and Inktomi.  The
Software Selection Team met with Autonomy and Verity last week.  Inktomi is
being consulted via phone.

? The SST is currently reviewing and completing the evaluation criteria
matrix using input from the three vendors being considered.  The matrix
results indicate the vendors have similar offerings.  We may need to pilot
all three vendors.

? The SST plans to get quotes on software prices from all three vendors.  GSS
has been consulted.

? BP Amoco was contacted to gain their perspective on Autonomy.  BP,s
application of Autonomy appears to be similar to what Enron desires.  The
Autonomy project has been in progress at BP since March 2000.  The
implementation has not been smooth.  Three other BP contacts were suggested
for additional testimony.  BP concluded Autonomy was an immature product.
Every challenge encountered resulted in Autonomy bringing in consultants to
develop patch solutions to resolve.  On a side note, BP uses a product from
Addept Software (UK) that serves the same function as what is envisioned with
Expert Finder.  More details on how this product is used will follow.

? EES is looking to purchase Verity.  Azurix is already using Verity.  EBS
has agreed to purchase/pilot Autonomy.

? Enron London had a negative experience piloting Autonomy.

? The UDM/ESE tool of choice needs to respect existing authority for
confidentiality. Each vendor,s product is being tested for confidentiality
and  security.

IM Strategy Proposal.
? Steve Kean is scheduled to attend the February 7th IM Task Force Meeting.
The Task Force will present the IM Strategy proposal and the  recommendation
to appoint an executive coordinator for IM ASAP.  Similar to Rick Causey,s
sponsorship of SAP, we will request like sponsorship for IM.

? Task force members are collecting examples of duplicate efforts.


I meant Joan Stramsky not Marge. Sorry about that. Joe

Joe Hillings
08/07/2000 05:57 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES (bcc: Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron)

Subject: Friday's Enron Presentations To USG Foreign Service Officers

Steve: The session organized for the the 32 foreign services officers at
Enron on Friday was excellent. Margaret Carson again this year put the
program together and also made one of the presentations. The reaction from
the visitors was gratifying. I know several of the FSOs who participated and
no doubt many throughout the Enron system will be in contact with them
throughout the globe over the next several years.

Joe Sutton keynoted the meeting giving attendees an overview of Enron but
also anwered several questions. This set a high tone for the rest of the
presentations by Mike Dahlke, Gloria Ogenyi and Margaret Carson on the
regional issues and projects important to Enron.

Earl Tisdale did a first rate job in explaining gas control operations in the
gas control presentation center and Kevin Presto, Christi Nicolay and Craig
Taylor were similarly effective on our power and gas trading floors.

Enron has been involved in the PESA hosted week for FSOs with a mixture of
DOE and DOC officers with energy assignments for the seven years the program
has been in existence. We have received many benefits both in Washington and
across the world from these people most of whom are headed for foreign
assignments. Our participation produces value for many at Enron involved in
policy, advocacy and development.

Each of these people deserve our thanks along with Carrie Robert, Courtney
Votaw and Marge Nadasky who facilitated the sessions.

I am not certain how to let all these people know what an outstanding job
they did for Enron on Friday but thought you would know the proper way to
thank them for a job well done.

Joe


Post Date: November 10, 2000
Category: MAINTENANCE
Subcategory: NWP MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
Subject: 01-158 December 2000 Monthly Maintenance

Notice Text:
All Shippers Letter # 01-158
Date:?? 11/10/00
Time:?? 15:30hrs

TO:???? All Shippers
Subject:??????? December 2000 Maintenance

WILLIAMS GAS PIPELINE-WEST / Northwest Pipeline SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
as posted 11 - 10, 2000

The following maintenance work is scheduled on Williams Gas Pipeline-West /
Northwest
Pipeline (WGP-W) during the month of December 2000.? The scheduled
maintenance is
Northwest's most recent projection of potential system impacts.? This
schedule is provided to assist you in planning your business for the coming
month. The impacts are estimates, which could change depending on other
scheduling factors.? If any scheduled maintenance activities change, an
updated notice will be posted to the EBB as soon as possible.

UPCOMING DECEMBER? SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE

*** November 27, 2000 - December 15, 2000

20" Camas - Eugene Pigging Project

Due to permit issues imposed by the City of Gresham, anomaly repair work on
the 20" Camas - Eugene line has been delayed from the original repair date of
October 23 & October 31, 2000, until the week of November 27, 2000 through
December 15, 2000.? It is not known at this time if any pipeline anomalies
will require repair. The 20" Camas to Eugene is paralleled by a 30" / 20"
loop line and no impacts are anticipated at this time.

*** November 10, 2000 - December 8, 2000

Vernal Pigging Project

WGP-W crews continue to excavate and repair anomalies between mainline valve
2-7
(M.P. 213) to mainline valve 2-10 (M.P. 263). Based on current data, it is
not known how
many pipeline anomalies will require repair.? Gas outages may be required
during this period
and will be communicated as quickly as the information becomes available.

***Dates are estimates and are subject to change.

WGP-W
st


David , if this is going to cause you political flack with Mary Joyce lets
just kill it - we have revised the original plan and this is probably not
needed.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Mary Joyce@ENRON
09/05/2000 02:51 PM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENA Comp suggestions for Project Raptor

David,

  I need more information on the project and who exactly the individuals are
who you feel should participate in this program.  Generally, developers and
deal people throughout the company are not provided with additional incentive
since this type of work is part of their job.  However, this project may be
an exception.  Please call and lets discuss.

Thanks!

MAry

David Oxley@ECT
08/30/2000 09:21 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA Comp suggestions for Project Raptor

I have been discussing with Dave Delainey how we might align the
compensation/rewards for the group of 4 or 5 VP's and Directors we have
assigned to disposing of our large portfolio ($650mm). The project is due to
complete in June 01 and Dave and my concern is whether we can make sure they
are motivated to close on time and get the best possible price for us. Dave
believe the up side could be as much as $150mm and the downside as much as
$300mm (the difference between best and worst prices/sales).

My suggestion is that we do the following and I would like your comments or
concerns if any:

Enter into contracts or an agreement (the later would be one way - us to them
and obviously easier) with each of them outlining the following:

Bonus targets based on financial targets and PRC performance for calendar 01
(ie if you rank in top 3 categories and you realise over $650 from this
project we will pay you not less than $300k)

Equity award on closing, on the basis of successful closure and above line
value (ie only in the event that this closes in June 01 and realises more
than $650mm we will grant you $200k in options, if above $800m then $350k in
options.)

Dave would like for me to get back to him on this asap.

David


Attached is a memo outlining key aspects of the recommendation issued by the assigned Administrative Law Judge in the above-referenced case.  The recommendation is now before the full Commission, which we expect will rule by mid-October.  Please call me if you have any questions.


To Jim's last point.  I understand that the good 'ol utility system was often
operated with little regard for basic economic principles, but there's
something in this that seems very odd and difficult to assess, and it seems
to always be tied to this notion that "California is a net importer, even in
the winter."  I'm going to start with the economics and then let folks
describe why it seemingly doesn't apply in Western electricity markets.

Just about every theory of economics and trade would lead to one conclusion:
If California closes it's doors the other Western states will pay higher
prices for power and/or face increased threats to reliability.  I'm
struggling to try to determine why these basic principles aren't applicable
to Western power markets.  I understand that the PNW is a very complex place
and that the reasons could be embedded in the arcane structure that has
developed over the years.

To keep it simple (though not necessarily accurate), I've confined the
analysis to a world in which only the PNW and California exist.

The basic situation: The PNW peaks in the winter; California peaks in the
summer.

Let's take two scenarios:

1)  The West, less California, is so awash in electricity that even in its
peak--the Winter--it still has power to send to California, i.e., it has so
overbuilt it's system that it has persistent surpluses to sell to California.

Irrespective, there have (to my limited knowledge) always been sales from CA
to the PNW during the winter, when the PNW is peaking.
The only conclusion that one can make, assuming that the PNW is awash in
electricity, is that the PNW takes the power in California because it makes
economic sense to do so. That is, during the winter peaking months, it must
be cheaper on the margin for the PNW to buy from California rather than
produce itself.  Otherwise, it's difficult to understand why it would buy
from California during this month, particularly if they're long.  As such, at
a minimum, the PNW's electric bill will necessarily increase if California
closes its doors.

2) Neither the PNW , nor California, has indigenous capacity to meet peaking
load.  Therefore, the PNW must buy California's power during its peaking
summer period, and California must buy power during it's summer peaking
period.  In this case, not only will the PNW's bill go up if California
closes its doors, the lights are likely to go because they'll be short power.

I realize that this is a simplistic model, and that there could be other
legitimate economic factors driving the flows out of California to the PNW
(e.g., transmission costs).  And again, I also realize that economics may not
have traditionally been a driver in the industry.  But I thought it might be
useful to get a common framework in place as a starting point for the
question that Jim asks.

With that, I'll pose the question (understanding the simplicity of the model
set forth above):  Given that California sends power north--even if the PNW
is long---how can California closing it doors not increase the PNW's cost of
power?

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	02/28/2001 08:05 AM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism

It seems to me that this information leads one to conclude that the value of
an open transmission network is that California does not have to build 5,000
MW of power plant (4,500 MW max input + 10%) in state.  In other words, if
California were to disconnect from the grid, someone would have to build
additional power plants in-state.

The cost to California consumers is therefore the annual carrying cost of 10
500 MW plants (made even more expensive after California expropriates the
current fleet of merchant generation).

From the perspective of the remainder of the West, the question still remains
- if California does go it alone, what is the economic impact?  Other than
legal arguments about Interstate Commerce, why should the Federal Government
want to continue to pursue open acess?  This is the hard question that we
need to answer.

Jim

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	02/27/2001 09:40 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Cost of Protectionism

Jim, Jeff:

Jim asked me in a voice mail what would be the cost to California of moving
from the current (evolving) system of open access to a "protectionist"
environment where access to the grid would be determined by a political body
responding to populist pressures.

Here are some things to consider.  We can talk more and I welcome Sue Mara or
Steve Walton's input:

California is a net importer so any restraint of trade would risk the state
being able to meet its own demand.  See attached slides that show PNW-CA
trade.  Even in the winter, power on a net basis flows south.

Limiting open access would primarily act to hold in-state generators hostage.
 this will kill incentives for new investment

If the ISO's proposal for market power mitigation are any guide of where a
protectionist ISO would go:
 in-state generators would be required to sell forward or lose their market
based rate certificates
 load serving entities would be required to contract forward for load and a
reserve margin.
  This is costly: it will lead to centralized planning solutions to
reliability rather than more efficient market     outcomes
 Artifical notions of "just and reasonable" rates (on top of unreasonable
reserve requirements) would lead to severe   reliability problems.  (In other
words, if Steve Peace has his way, the imports into the state will drop
off     signficanly)

There is no reason the state would be more effective at expanding the grid
(e.g., Path 15) than the current system.  (Although, admittedly the current
system has flaws.  The CAISO was set up with little thought to transmission
expansion planning.  Other RTOs are not repeating this mistake.).


Your deal # 581358.1 is showing a price of 65.70 but on the Real Time
spreadsheet, I see 65.00.  Which is correct?

Thanks for you help

Judy


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
01:58 PM ---------------------------

"Val Generes" <valgeneres@ev1.net> on 03/09/2001 12:56:09 PM
Please respond to "Val Generes" <valgeneres@ev1.net>
To: <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: BB

?
 - burkebrooke2.jpg
 - burkebrooke1.jpg


richard sanders in our litigation group will be calling you to get some more
details re this.
have you seen the transcripts of the exams? can we get?
will you have someone in your shop work with mary heinitz here (713-853-3245)
about pulling together our proof of claim?

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com

	"Jerald Ancel" <Ancel@sommerbarnard.com>
	05/21/2001 03:19 PM

		 To: <Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Heartland Steel

After tennis yesterday with Dave Kleiman counsel to the creditor's committee
our conversation turned to Heartland Steel.  You will recall that the
committee  had launched a series of 2004 exams concerning activities of the
company board.  It appears that the committee is looking at potential actions
against the board arising out of decisions to create short term operating
capital by stretching unsecured creditors.  David, intimated to me that they
had discovered certain minutes of the board which discuss these issues
specifically.


- kudlow060701.doc


When: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 3801

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

To discuss CPs getting termination letters: Johns Manville, Kerr-McGee, Virginia Power, Whirlpool.

To discuss other CPs which raised issues: Stone, Select, etc.


when can i burn those cds?


I do not believe that statement is correct.  The limitation was required in
the corporate documents of the company, so it should apply to all
agreements.  Can you send me up a copy of the Password Application and I will
give Steve Norris a call.  Thanks.

	Camille Gerard@ENRON
	10/14/2000 12:44 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ClickPaper Approvals for 10/05/00 and 10/06/00

Tana,

We now have an application from Tembec, Inc.   Steven Norris, as Treasurer,
is the one signing the Password Application for Tembec.   When John Cummings
met with him last week, Steve stated that he would be involved in setting up
the users for Physical transactions.

After reading the requirements below, it sounds like the two signature rule
applies to Financial transactions only.

In other words, can we set up Steve as well as his users with Physical access
without two officers' signing?

If so, then we could get them on-line with Physical access and then work on
whatever we need for Financial access.

Thanks for your help!
Camille
36150

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/10/2000 04:28 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper Approvals for 10/05/00 and 10/06/00

On the 10/05/00 List:  Tembec, Inc.'s bylaws require that agreements signed
by the company must be signed by any two of the following officers:   the
President or a Vice President together with any Director, Secretary or
Assistant Secretary.  If you are going to trade with them online you must
ensure that the Password Application gets signed by those officers, or if not
by those officers, they must provide a resolution if any officer except those
above signs the documentation.  Because of this signatory restriction
EnronOnline was hesitant to open them for financial trading.  It's up to your
group, but you must comply with these special signatory requirements.  If you
would like Legal to pass on the documentation if you are unsure, forward it
up to me.


Attached please find the legal risk memo for the Ohio Schools transaction.


Elizabeth- I think it best that at this stage I opt out of this engagement. The situation I described to you is looking more and more like it is going to happpen and there is a real possibility I am totally engaged by the time this conference comes around. I am sorry if this poses a problem for you but there should be plenty of time to arrange an alternate. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Elizabeth Bassine" <e.bassine@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Elizabeth+20Bassine+22+20+3Ce+2Ebassine+40worldnet+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	Economist

Hi Rick, hope you're doing okay .  . .
Have a request re your write-up.  Can we,  please, shift the emphasis from the 'effective cro' - to how you managed the  risk inherent in the huge transition Enron has made, completely evolved, from an  energy to an ebusiness company.  Address online marketplaces/the value-add;  the shifting strategies involved in transitioning the company . . .
Is this okay?
I'll need the paragraph/bullets by Thurs pm, if at  all possible.  Thanks, Rick and take care -
PS  Also need your brief bio and complete  contact info (incl mailing address)


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Hi, Elizabeth!

Cynthia asked me to forward you our Master Services Agreement relating to our
telecom products and the Master Media Services Agreement relating to
advertising.  We will be making conforming changes to both agreements to
correct nits as we find them, but will send you any substantive changes we
may make.  Let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie

P.S.  I can't believe that the day I saw you so many times I forgot to
congratulate you on becoming a VP!  Am I slow or what?(you really don't need
to answer).  CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!  You deserve it!

M

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net


Lindy, if all FERC wanted is  a list and contacts, this looks fine.  If they
wanted exact MDQ and usage numbers for each customer, let me know.  DF

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           12/11/2000 05:39 PM

To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Request

Not having received the request,  it seems like the quantity related to the
contract would provide them better info than a contact name and phone
number-  did they specifically ask for that inf0??  upon answer, work
directly with Drew as I'll be out.   MK

Lindy Donoho
12/11/2000 04:22 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Request

Please see my original message below.  Are you okay with TW forwarding this
info to FERC?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:21 PM ---------------------------

Steven Harris
12/11/2000 04:19 PM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC Request

Maybe you should ask Drew or Mary K.

Lindy Donoho
12/11/2000 03:01 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FERC Request

In response to a request of Steve January from FERC, I've put together a list
of Transwestern's "major" shippers to California with contact names and phone
numbers.  I've defined "major" as anyone with total firm contracts of
25,000/d or more.  Please see the attached list.  Is everyone okay with me
passing this along to Ray Montini at FERC?

Let me know if it's okay to go or if I need to run this by anyone else before
sending it out.

Thanks,
Lindy


CACT NG sheets for Thursday


eSource presents Investext training

Investext offers immediate online delivery of original-image and full-text
research reports from more than 800 of the world's top investment banks,
market research firms, and trade associations.  This product is designed to
provide all the information you need to know about a particular company,
industry, or market.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Querying by company ticker in order to retrieve analyst reports.
? Querying via Investexts free text module to retrieve industry-specific
information: including statistics, economic indicators, analysis, trends,
forecasts and surveys.

Attend one of our Investext Clinics:

May. 11 - 10:30 -11:30 AM  EB572

And

May. 16 - 10:30 -11:30 AM  EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


I will check with Michael and see if it's feasible to do a quick evaluation
of his software here in Houston.

--Stinson

Vince J Kaminski
04/24/2001 05:22 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Willow and Pathstar evaluations

Stinson,

He keeps bugging us about it.
Any thoughts what we should do?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
05:22 PM ---------------------------

"Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com> on 04/24/2001 10:03:24 AM
Please respond to "Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Willow and Pathstar evaluations

Hi Vince -

Hope all is well with you.

Sharad hasn't had time to evaluate our Willow Tree or Monte Carlo software
since the middle of last year.  Is there somebody else that could do it?

Please let me know who I should send the evaluation to.

Best Regards,

Michael Curran
CEO
Quantin' Leap Limited
Piercy House
7 Copthall Avenue
London EC2R 7NJ

Tel: +44 (0)20 7562 3450
Fax: +44 (0)20 7562 3411

mailto:mcurran@quantinleap.com

http://www.quantinleap.com


Claire:
Here is the information for the Calpine project that we talked about
yesterday and that Jim Simpson sent you the e-mail about.

Hypothetical 4 LM 6000 Peaking Project in Eastern PJM
VOM:  $2.23
H.R. 10,5000
Gas Curve: Transco Zone 6
Power Curve: East Hub Curve in PJM
Commercial Operations Date: 6/1/01

We are looking for a 3 and 5 year capacity number ($/kw-mo.) one number for
each time period.  Please let me know if you need any more information
regarding the project.  Thanks for your help.
Ben


Subject:		Post Petition Organizational Meeting
Day:			Tuesday
Date:			December 11, 2001
Time:			9:00 AM CST
Location:		ECN 5C2 (old building)


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Mark E. Koenig
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Mark Koenig
Report Total: $1,718.02
Amount Due Employee: $1,718.02

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


You're on.  He's getting to be such a good age for theater.

ckm

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 03/16/2001 03:18:56 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: The Lion King

   I would love to.  He is going to flip over it!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Brashear, Charlotte
Cc: Mann Neil (E-mail)
Subject: Re: The Lion King

My guess would be the week of the 4th of July, then again sometime in
August.  I agree that he really should see it.  If you want to take him,
that's great, or we will be glad to take him.

Kay

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 03/16/2001 03:12:14 PM

To:   "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:   "Mann Neil (E-mail)" <nmann@erac.com>

Subject:  The Lion King

           I keep forgetting to discuss this with you.  The Lion King will
be
here for the entire month of July, and Michael MUST see it.  I don't care
whether you two take him or me, but it's an absolute.  This will be my
third
time to see it.  The tickets go on sale around June 1.  Do you know yet
when
you will be on vacation?
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Sorry in getting back with you soooooo late, but it's been crazy around
here!!!!!  Thank YOU again for lunch!!!!  I enjoyed it!!!  Maybe we can go to
lunch again soon.  Let me know  :)

Regards,

Dena Pawlowski
ENRON North America
P.O. Box 1188
1400 Smith Street, EB-3524c
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
Office:  713-853-5073
Pager:  281-631-1310


FYI

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McDonald, Rebecca
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J.
Subject:	RE: Moddeling support for DPC related issues

Vince,

I'm sorry for taking so long in responding.  Thank you for allowing us to access Sandeep.  We may have a need for his time and if so we will try to give you as much notice as we can.  Thanks for the offer, it is appreciated.

Regards
Rebecca

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince
Sent:	Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	McDonald, Rebecca; Hughes, James A.
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince
Subject:	Moddeling support for DPC related issues

A quick  update on the status of Sandeep Kohli.

He is working currently in my group. He is available on a very short notice to help you with
any quantitative modeling  that can be required in making decisions regarding
our DPC strategy. In case you need his help, he can also rely on the support
of other members of my group with skills in different areas.

Vince Kaminski


Without overselling this right now, (as I only received the information
through a source other than the utility),  It looks like EOG is going to make
some serious adjustments to their gas choice program.  Here is what I know so
far.  EOG is meeting with the marketers who are serving residential customers
behind their system  to try to get their support on their program ideas
before formally submitting it to the PUCO.  The following are the parameters
that I have received so far:
Voluntary Capacity Assignment
Local storage goes with the customer and is built into the base distribution
rates
Third party billing
If EOG does the single billing they will buy the receivables at 99%
Balancing and trueups will be monthly
Rollout process in June
Program would begin in September
Open the entire service territory
Rumor has it that this has been preshopped with Chairman Schrieber.  I will
be making a trip to Cleveland to discuss the details with East Ohio and will
meet with Rob Tongren (Ohio's Consumer Counsel) to get his insight on this as
well.   EOG is the second largest gas utility in Ohio and represents 1.2
million customers.


SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN
530 BROADWAY
SAN DIEGO, CA  92101
tel: 619-446-3000
fax: 619-446-3010

Hotel Information: http://courtyard.com/SANCD

ARRIVAL CONFIRMATION:
 Confirmation Number: 81643512
 Guests in Room: 1
 Name: MR ERIC BASS
 Guest Phone: 7138530977
 Number of Rooms: 1
 Arrive: 28 Dec 2000
 # Nights: 3
 Depart: 31 Dec 2000
 Room Type: ROOM - QUALITY
 Guarantee Method:
  Credit card guarantee
 Cancellation Policy:
  CANCELLATION PERMITTED-BEFORE 1800 DAY OF ARRIVAL

SPECIAL REQUEST:
  NON-SMOKING ROOM, REQUEST NOT AVAILABLE
  NEAR ELEVATOR, REQUEST NOTED

RATE INFORMATION:
 Arrival Date: 28 Dec 2000
  Room Rate:  89.10 Per Night. Plus Tax When Applicable
  Rate Program: AAA AMERICAN AUTO ASSN

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
Any Inquires Please call 1-800-321-2211 or your local
international toll free number.

Confirmation Sent: Thu Nov 30 09:51:00 2000

Legal Disclaimer:
This confirmation notice has been transmitted to you by electronic
mail for your convenience. Marriott's record of this confirmation
notice is the official record of this reservation. Subsequent
alterations to this electronic message after its transmission
will be disregarded.


Please remember to fill out the status sheets of the curves which you have completed.  This can be found at o:\common\curve validation\estate reporting\gas\progress summary.

Thanks,

Kathy


Please confirm that this schedule works.  It is the only day
that worked for everyone.  Jeff Dasovich is still in the Sierras so I can
check
in with him Monday.

  The agenda sounds simple but don't be deceived, there are many
many options.  Please be prepared with a list of 3 top speaker choices.

  1.  Topics of panels.

  2.  Speaker list.  Try to agree on an 'A' list who we can start
calling and a 'B' list of alternates.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/24/2000
05:43 PM ---------------------------

Steven J Kean@EES
08/24/2000 12:28 PM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@EES
To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Chris
Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES,
Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT@EES, mday@gmssr.com@EES, SF
Directors@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@EES, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Mary Hain@Enron@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron@EES, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@EES, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT@EES

Subject: Re: Daily Update / Legislative Update - 8/23/00

It's hard to formulate a position without more of the specifics, but I think
our message should generally be:
We support providing immediate rate relief to small residential customers.
We believe that relief is best provided by giving San Diego the ability to
procure power on a fixed price basis from the market.  San Diego has offers
in front of it now; those should be evaluated and the legislature and the
commission should give San Diego the flexibility to accept one or more of
them.  This is sounder than running huge deferrals (deficits) to be later
recovered from consumers.
Rate relief should be accompanied by real reform.  Rate caps have bad long
term consequences: they cause shortages.  Combining short-medium term rate
relief with expedited siting of new facilities will address the near term
problem while laying the proper groundwork for a long term solution.

Bruno Gaillard@EES
08/24/2000 11:08 AM
To: Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Chris
Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES,
Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT, mday@gmssr.com, SF Directors, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Daily Update / Legislative Update - 8/23/00

This email reflects today's events in Sacramento. The information provided is
subject to change because of constant flux. However it is important for us to
provide this information for feedback and to caution as to new regulations
that may affect some deals in the making .

Governor Davis, Assembly Women Susan Davis, and Senator Alpert had a press
conference.

They will introduce a rate/bill stabilization plan for SDG&E and an
expediting siting bill. There is no language as of yet.

Although there is no specific language, the following elements may be
included:

The stabilization plan will be applicable to residential and probably
commercial customers in SDG&E
The bill cap may be set at $68 for residential.
The cap will be in place until the end of 2002
There will be language on expediting siting for generation plants

Sam Wehn and Sandra McCubbin have been talking with the CEC executive
director and several legislators about the siting portion of the bill.

Any comments as to the bill cap proposal?


Do you owe money? Is it getting troublesome keeping track
of all those bills and whom you owe how much and when? Would
it not be easier if you could just make 1 monthly payment
instead of several? We can help!

  If your debts are $4,000 US or more and you are a United
States citizen, you can consolidate your debt into just one
easy payment! You do not have to own a home, nor do you need
to take out a loan. Credit checks are not required!

  To receive more information regarding our services, please
fill out the form below and return it to us, or provide the
necessary information in your response. There are absolutely
no obligations. All the fields below are required for your
application to be processed.

**********

Full Name :
Address :
City :
State :
Zip Code :
Home Phone :
Work Phone :
Best Time to Call :
E-Mail Address :
Estimated Debt Size :

**********

Please allow upto ten business days for application
processing.

Thank You

Note: If this e-mail arrived to you by error, or you wish
to never receive such advertisements from our company,
please reply to this e-mail with the word REMOVE in the
e-mail subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences

j9aqqi2


Rick Shapiro
Portland registration in cal
Former CEC commissioner -- Bob Mussiter


- haloween_invite.doc


Don't know what you think, but Duncan Sheik is playing at the Mucky Duck tomorrow night...Thurs could work for me too, we'll see.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jennifer Bowles" <jkbowles@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jennifer+20Bowles+22+20+3Cjkbowles+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, May 07, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	Re: You want philosophical...you get philosophical

I loved it!  Thanks for the "mantra"... very good young Susan, very good...
I would love to get together this week.... what does your's look like?
Thursday night possibly???

Thank you too for hanging out with us this weekend... I had a ball (which,
as you know was a pleasant surprise!).... it is always a pleasure my dear
:o).

AND, thank you for offering wedding help... I may just take you up on that
at some point...

Love you,

Jen

>From: "Scott, Susan M." <Susan.M.Scott@ENRON.com>
>To: "jennifer bowles (E-mail)" <jkbowles@hotmail.com>
>Subject: You want philosophical...you get philosophical
>Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 09:25:06 -0500
>
>Okay, you asked for it....
>
>				The mind I love must have wild places, a
>tangled orchard where dark
>                                   damsons drop in the heavy grass, an
>overgrown little wood, the chance of a
>                                   snake or two, a pool that nobody's
>fathomed the depth of, and paths
>                                   threaded with flowers planted by the
>mind.
>                                   - - - Katherine Mansfield
>
>I absolutely love this quote.  It manages to state, significantly more
>eloquently than myself, my own personal mantra of the last few years...I
>want to be pleasantly surprised.  Which is ultimately why I don't see it
>within my power in the near future to settle.  Maybe years down the road
>when desperation has set in I'll break down and throw myself at some
>sub-par individual, but let's hope it never gets to that point or if it
>does that I'm bordering on senile and just don't know any better.
>
>Anyway, I'm so glad we got to spend so much time together at Deborah's
>wedding and I love hanging out with you Mom and Becka (sp?)...they crack
>me up.  If there's anything I can do to assist you with this wedding,
>let me know...even if you just need someone to run errands with or
>support your ideas.  I'd love to get together sometime this week for a
>drink, coffee, dinner, or whatever if you have any free time.  Maybe
>Lisa would be available as well?
>
>Talk to you soon,
>Sue

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


You received this e-mail because you registered on the E*TRADE Web site, or
on one of our partners' sites. If you do not want to receive partner e-mail
offers, or any E*TRADE marketing e-mail, you can change your preferences now.
You are subscribed at: sscott3@enron.com

[IMAGE]

E*TRADE Partner Offers
Special Offers for Empowered Investors

Dear SUSAN,

Dell
Double Your Memory - Free

Intel
Double Your Memory - Free

Servers
Shared
Printers

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]Dell(tm) PowerEdge(tm)
300 Servers
Starting
at only $999!
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]Shared
website hosting
Starting at
$17.95/month
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]HP DeskJet 952
printer
Photo-quality images, only $249!

[IMAGE]

Copyright 2000 Dell Computer Corporation. U.S. only.
Pricing, specifications and availability may change without notice. Taxes and
shipping charges are extra, and vary. May be combined with other offers. U.S.
only. Valid for Dell Small Business Center purchases only. Dell, the Dell
logo, Dimension, Dell Inspiron and PowerEdge are trademarks of Dell Computer
Corporation. The Intel Inside Pentium III Processor logo is a registered
trademark of Intel Corporation.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

?

E*TRADE and the E*TRADE logo are registered trademarks of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
or its subsidiaries. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property
of their respective owners. All rights reserved.

?

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, E*TRADE is not responsible for
the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the
products or services advertised. E*TRADE takes your privacy seriously. To
learn more about E*TRADE's use of personal information, please read our
Privacy Policy. If you do not want to receive further mailings from E*TRADE,
unsubscribe now. If you have previously unsubscribed from E*TRADE's e-mail
list, but have received this mailing, please note that it takes approximately
five business days to process your request.

[IMAGE]


Susan,

Attached is the mater netting agreements table of contents including the liquids agreements and the ConAgra master agreement.  As soon as Credit provides me with fully executed copies I will make copies for your binder as well.

Thanks.
Nony

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:48 PM
To:	Flores, Nony
Subject:	master netting project

Nony,

As discussed, attached is the general index and my table of contents, which describes the agreements in narrative form.

Thanks for your help.

 << File: executed master netting agreements.doc >>                    << File: master netting agreements (table of contents).doc >>
Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Gerald,

Im still getting the capital $ pulled together.  The attached two files list
the air quality permits and water dischage permits.  Ill have to fax to you
the list of road crossings.  Let me know what else you need.  Thanks

Ken
---------------------- Forwarded by Ken Choyce/DEN/ECT on 08/25/2000 01:47 PM
---------------------------
    - Site List - KChoyce.xls


here is Jennifer's message ....
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:14
AM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/15/2000 02:43 PM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Bridge Problems

Beth,
I know you are at the VP level but I thought I would forward you the memo
below.
I wrote it to explain to the EnronOnline Call Center the various issues we
have been having with the "bridge" since they get a vast
number of internal calls when we have a problem.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I should be funneling
these concerns to a particular person.
Thanks.
Jennifer
3-5824

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/15/2000 02:31 PM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/10/2000 05:22 PM

To: EOL Call Center
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bridge Problems

Over the last 8-10 business days, we have had a some issues on the bridges. I
want to educate you a little bit on what can cause
"bridge problems".

First, what I want to explain is their is ONE GUI bridge application for
users (backoffice users) to monitor the bridge but there are MULTIPLE
systems that EnronOnline transactions can be pointed to downstream. This is
important to understand because if you do not know this ,
it may seem like we are having the same problem over & over; ie "the bridge
is having problems". But in actuality, it is DIFFERENT
problems. Still not good - but at least it cannot be isolated to ONE
problem.

Also, due to multiple systems (Sitara, Enpower, GasDesk, Tagg/ERMS,
Powerdesk) are listening for messages from one EnronOnline,
a "bridge" problem could be one of many issues. Some of which are:

 The server for EnronOnline  messenger goes down (doesn't send message to
bridge to process)
 The Enron network goes down (cannot send message thru bridge)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down
 Sitara server goes down
 Enpower server goes down
 Tagg/ERMS server goes down
 Deal worker in ANY system gets "hung up"
 Huge volume slows down processing time for one or more downstream systems
 Scheduled outage for maintenance on server on weekend was not re-started on
Sunday

and the list goes on.....................................

FYI In the past week & 1/2, the following actions happened, which caused
"bridge" problems.

 Scheduled outage for maintenance on TAGG/erms server on weekend was not
re-started on Sunday (not smart)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down (affected Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)
 Deal worker in Sitara system got "hung up" and servers had to be bounced
 Member of EnronOnline Dev Team changed data for specific tokenised periods
during trading hours instead of end of day
  (This failed deals in bridge for Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)

One thing to remember is you are getting calls from traders & back office.
Traders are calling because they cannot see deals in their
position manager application of their system. If they are gas traders, if
could be Sitara or Tagg system. If they are a power trader
calling, they cannot see it in Enpower. ecetera, ecetera

If a back office person calls, they are watching the monitor GUI and they can
see deals queing/backing up and know there is a problem.

We are working to resolve some of these issues, particularily,
multi-processing tools, as we know the # of transactions will only increase.
Please feel free to email me if you have any questions. I hope this was
helpful.

See below for explanation of problem on Wednesday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/09/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

KARIE HASTINGS
08/09/2000 02:06 PM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Kinkead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Production Problem

I am forwarding a message that explains the Sitara Production problems from
this morning. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Karie (36759)

At  9:50am this morning a DealWorker process in the Sitara system became
unresponsive.
At  10:00 am it was determined that the EOLBridge in sitara was not
processing new deal requests
and diagnostics lead to an indication that the dealworker was not functioning
properly.
At 10:14, am the Dealworker was forced down and a new one restarted.
At 10:21 am , the EOLBridge began processing deals.

The cause of the is difficult to determine, but indicators point to an error
in the CORBA product we are using,
most likely due to scalability issues of that product and of Sitara. This is
an issue that is actively being addressed.

--Mark Kinkead
3-1961


As of this morning, we have lost access to TAGG applications.  All Windows
2000 users will not be able to access TAGG until the upgrade is completed.
The team anticipates completion of the upgrade by the end of the week.

Thanks.
Nony


Group,
We have had some problems recently with the creation of HA finals, with SQL errors, and as a result we have not been able to run reports. If it is a weekend (or holiday), we first need to import DA finals and then create DA finals in CAPS. After this is done we can import HA finals, and create the HA report. If the boxes are not checked, the CISO may have missed publishing certain hours. Please look in the load zones to find what hour-ahead finals may not have been published, or where CAPS may have just missed pulling them in. Sometimes it helps to pull the missing hour-ahead finals in individually. Once all the finals are in the load zones and int. interchanges, you should be able to create the final report. Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Bill


John,

Please find attached the resume of Angie Zeman, who is an analyst working a
rotation in East Gas Logistics.  She is an outstanding perfromer and is
interested in pursuing opportunities  in London.  Who is the best person in
your organization to communicate her interest and my recommendation?

Thanks.

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 06:23 AM
---------------------------

Angie Zeman@ENRON
12/04/2000 05:00 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Angie's Resume


I wanted to bring to this group's attention the Maryland PSC staff's comments
regarding BGE's standby service proposal.  The proposal in its current form
is a result of numerous settlement meetings among BGE, staff, Enron, Trigen
(a developer of on-site generation), and several large industrial customers.

In staff's comments, it talks about the DG-related issues raised -- but not
addressed -- by BGE's filing, and it encourages the Commission to adopt
state-wide policies to promote a vibrant competitive market for DG
services.   Harry -- it appears that our many hours spent educating the staff
(and others) on DG issues was well worth the time.   Significantly, staff
states in its comments that:

"A third issue that can impact the adoption of DG services is that of
interconnection policies.  Interconnection policy differences between the
IOUs (statewide) can significantly retard the development of a vibrant DG
industry for services to customers.  As with other aspects of electric
restructuring, Staff believes that common accepted rules that have statewide
applicability will promote electric services competition.  Hence, the
adoption of &one8 set of interconnection standards could provide a good
incentive for developing a DG services market in Maryland.  Staff believes
that eventually, the State of Maryland may need to adopt 'a proposed' set of
interconnection standards that apply Statewide."

Further, staff talks about the benefits of DG:

"Increasing the use of DG services could help Customers by decreasing their
costs and adding flexibility to their use of electricity services.  Some
parties could argue that increasing use of DG would also help BGE and allow
it to avoid unneeded investments in T&D.  The net result would provide
greater diversity of demand in the wire delivery system and improve overall
electricity service efficiency.   Staff is of the opinion that a fuller
adoption of DG services is a positive development, which can provide benefits
to customers of BGE as well as the IOUs, in terms of avoided (and perhaps
unnecessary) investments in T&D, and also provide benefits to the State of
Maryland in terms of a more efficient electric service industry, including
environmental benefits."

Please let me know if you would like a copy of BGE's standby filing.

Lisa

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/HOU/EES on 05/19/2000 10:41 AM
---------------------------

gelert@psc.state.md.us on 05/19/2000 08:53:35 AM

To:	rbourland@alexander-cleaver.com, gcarmean@psc.state.md.us,
dcarson@sweetheart.com, jconopask@psc.state.md.us, daniel.p.gahagan@bge.com,
s1kilberg@sweetheart.com, edie.l.kinsley@bge.com,
eklingenstein@dgs.state.md.us, wluoma@trigen.com, mmadigan@trigen.com,
john.j.murach@bge.com, mwnayden@ober.com, kjobuszewski@sweethart.com,
stratergy@mediaone.net, smckinley@ingaa.org, jhose@alleghenyenergy.com,
sheldon.switzer@bge.com, rtaylor@dgs.state.md.us, ctimmerman@psc.state.md.us,
jwallach@resourceinsight.com, sriverhbw@aol.com, swise@gfrlaw.com, Lisa
Yoho/HOU/EES@EES, slazarus@psc.state.md.us
cc:	gelert@psc.state.md.us

Subject:	BGE Schedule S filing

Greetings:  Attached are Staff's comments submitted to the Commission with
respect to BGE's Schedule S filing.  This item will be before the Maryland
Commission, at the May 24, 2000, Administration Meeting.  (See attached
file: R-1544cover.doc)(See attached file: R-1544text.doc)

If you have any questions about this matter, you may contact me at (410)
767-8026 (prior to 5/23), or Calvin Timmerman at (410) 767-8058.

Many Thanks,
Gunter

 - R-1544cover.doc
 - R-1544text.doc


>
> TO:   FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
> FROM:  LIZ JONES
>
> DEAR SIR:
>
>  I RECENTLY PURCHASED A FLORIDA LOTTERY TICKET.  AFTER THE WINNING
NUMBERS WERE ANNOUNCED, I REALIZED THAT MY NUMBERS WERE DIFFERENT THAN THE
ONES I MEANT TO PICK.
>
>  I WAS VERY UPSET BECAUSE I MEANT TO PUT DOWN THE NUMBERS THAT WON.
REALLY !!!
>
>  THE INTEGRITY OF THE FLORIDA LOTTERY SYSTEM DEPENDS ON PEOPLE HAVING THE
NUMBERS THEY INTENDED TO PICK.
>
>                SEND ME THE MONEY.  OTHERWISE, MY ATTORNEY THINKS I HAVE A
VERY GOOD CASE, AND I'LL SEE YOUR ASS IN COURT!
>
>  IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?
>
>
>  PS.  I ALSO VOTED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY.
>
>
>


Nicely done!

From:	PEGGY FOWLER/ENRON@enronxgate on 05/03/2001 07:03 PM
To:	Mitchell Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Fwd: ONLINE RUMOR MILL PIECE ATTACHED

We ran the attached in our employee newsline this week, along with other info
from the week.....needed to address newspaper article and thought this was a
good way to do that.

-----Original Message-----
Date:  05/03/2001  03:31 pm  (Thursday)
From:  Kimberlie Zerba
To:  PEGGY FOWLER
Subject:  ONLINE RUMOR MILL PIECE ATTACHED


Rod,

As we discussed earlier today, I am attaching an updated  proposal:

Regards,

Soma


LuckySurf.com, the FREE game that plays just like the Lottery,
has sent out Instant Winner Emails just like this one. And, this Email
could be a $1,000 Instant Cash Winner!
http://click.iexpect.com/iExpectOffer.shtml?c=luckysurf&n=A

Just click below, pick 7 numbers, register, then click a banner. You'll
find out if you've won $1,000 Cash Instantly! All in about a minute.
Plus, you'll automatically be entered in the daily $1-Million Jackpot Drawing.
That's it. No Catch. No Clause.

http://click.iexpect.com/iExpectOffer.shtml?c=luckysurf&n=A

Thanks and Good Luck !
The LuckySurf.com Team

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this Special Offer as a valued iExpect.com member.
If you do not wish to receive any Special Offers from us in the future,
please click the link below to unsubscribe.
http://www.iexpect.com/MyPrivacy.shtml?campaign=LUCKYA&uid=1000176724471DM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Cool!
m

John L Nowlan
10/19/2000 11:44 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tanker Freight Futures

---------------------- Forwarded by John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 11:44
AM ---------------------------

Scott Moncrieff
10/19/2000 11:04 AM
To: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Mahoney/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tanker Freight Futures

c.c. Chris

Hey John

just to let you know we went on line today for the first time with tanker
freight futures
(last week had some teething problems, as eol didnt know about world scale)

anyway we traded 320,000 mts freight in the first day

so encouraging signs .....

(p.s. fyg i think coal have done about 350,000 mts in the last 6 weeks...)