Note:  The following 3 articles deal with 3 different issues:

1st -- Marketing related
2nd - Operations/marketing related
3rd - Legislative/regulatory related

El Paso Explosion Takes 500 MMcf/d Off Market

About 1 Bcf/d of flow on El Paso's South Mainline downstream of Pecos River
(NM) Station ceased after the
pipeline exploded early Saturday, killing 10 people and seriously injuring
two others at a nearby campsite.

El Paso said Monday it was able to compensate for about half that volume
through a combination of fuel
switching by downstream customers, maximum storage withdrawals, an OFO and
other customer cooperation.

The market reaction was rather predictable as all three California points
rose by about 35 cents to lead an
overall price surge. However, utilities in the state did not appear to be
experiencing any supply problems.
SoCal Gas said storage and supplies from other Southwest receipt points were
adequate to avoid any
problems. A gas operations official for Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power
also saw no reason for panic.
From past similar incidents on Southwest pipelines, he expected that the
approximately 80-feet-long section
missing from El Paso's line could be "slapped back into place rather
quickly."

El Paso itself had no estimate for when it can restore service in the
impacted segment; it must get approval
rom the federal investigators before beginning repairs or evaluating a
restart of the adjacent lines. But a large
aggregator and a marketer agreed with the LADWP official that it should be "a
quick mechanical fix" once
repairs begin. The aggregator believed downtime could be as short as a week.

No customers were cut off as a result of the rupture but some were getting
reduced volumes, an El Paso
spokeswoman said.

Northern Natural Gas was seeing a throughput increase of 200-300 MMcf/d
Monday while Transwestern
volumes were up 50-75 MMcf/d as a result of shippers diverting gas away from
El Paso's South Mainline,
an Enron spokeswoman said. A producer said she diverted as much of her
company's gas as possible from
El Paso to Transwestern.

People were reluctant to trade Permian Basin gas Monday, especially at fixed
prices, because of doubts
about how much would be able to flow, several sources said. Permian numbers
rose a little less than 18 cents
as part of the general upturn. However, it was Waha prices that saw a bigger
increase of nearly 30 cents as a
result. "Everything in El Paso-Permian's Keystone pool was going back into
Waha," said a marketer, putting
Waha in the mid $4.60s at a premium of more than a nickel above Henry Hub.

The Southern California border, at an average of nearly $5.30, led the rest
of Monday's market by a large margin.
Before trading began, EnronOnline was offering border swing swaps for the
rest of the month at $5.85-95, a
marketer said. With swing swaps priced so high, it gave sellers more
confidence in what prices they could
command in the day market, he said. "Either way, I wouldn't want to be short
right now at the border."

There were lots of rumors but no facts available on what caused the El Paso
rupture, noted one aggregator.
"But it's a good thing it didn't happen until after California had cooled
off. Otherwise I could easily have seen
the border basis spread from San Juan Basin go as high as $2.50" instead of
the approximate gap of $1.70
egistered Monday by Daily GPI.

A knowledgeable source provided his analyis of the blast: The structure of
the crater made the rupture "look
like a line integrity problem from the way it blew out." The earth can harbor
leaking gas for a while until eventually
everything all goes up at once. People nearby would not have detected
anything because gas is odorless in
long-haul lines; the mercaptan odorant is not added until it gets to the
local distribution stage. Pipeline safety
surveyors usually will look for dead vegetation in the vicinity to detect a
leak, but this was a desert area with very
little vegetation. It is easily possible for escaping gas to hug the ground
for the approximate 500-foot distance to
the victims' campsite and seek an ignition source there. It is a normal
tendency for gas leaking into the atmosphere
to stay close to the ground, and that tendency would have been amplied by the
chilliness of the pre-dawn desert.

The source went on to say, "I think there will be lot more of this [ruptures]
in the future with many pipes becoming at
least 40-50 years old." El Paso was unlucky in experiencing one of the early
incidents, he said, because the situation
applies to the other lines with old pipe. Pipelines used to spend a lot more
money on maintenance when regulation
was tighter and they were still paying for depreciation, he said. "Now
they're more purely for-profit companies after
having written off their [depreciation] costs many times over."

_________________________________________________________

El Paso Blast Kills 10; Shuts Down South Mainline

Federal and company investigators Monday swarmed over the scene of the
devastating El Paso Natural Gas
mainline explosion that erupted near daybreak Saturday, engulfing a party of
weekend campers along the Pecos
River near Carlsbad, NM, and killing 10 people. Two other persons were
hospitalized in critical condition.

Three officials from the federal Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) and 11 with
the National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB) have been at the site of the blast since late Saturday, and two
more OPS officials were en route
Monday. New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who flew to the area on Sunday, said he
wanted to know how many
other potential pipeline "dangers" there are in the state. He called for a
thorough investigation.

About 1 Bcf/d of capacity on El Paso's southern leg initially was lost from
the ruptured 30-inch line and two looped
lines nearby that were shut in after the accident. El Paso was making up some
of the shortfall by drawing the
maximum, 200 MMcf/d from its Washington Ranch Storage Field downstream of the
accident. Increased use of
other pipelines, allocations and cutbacks by customers, and the fact that
weather had moderated in California
helped ease the supply situation. Nevertheless, spot prices increased by
about 35 cents for points in California,
while the rest of the market (spurred by Hurricane Debby) went up about 20
cents.

There was no estimate as to when the looped lines would be back in service,
according to El Paso spokesperson
Kim Wallace.

"We don't intend to put anything back into service until we know for certain
that the remaining pipelines are safe,"
Wallace said. She did not expect them to be back in service today, and could
give no time frame on when they
would be returned to service.

It is "much too premature at this point" to predict when the three disabled
El Paso westbound lines will return to
service, said Patricia Klinger, a spokeswoman with the Department of
Transportation's Research and Special
Programs Administration (RSPA), which oversees the OPS.

"The one that ruptured is definitely going to be out of service for awhile,
and [another line] is badly damaged
from the fire." As for a third adjacent line, that "could potentially be
re-opened," but "we have to test the integrity
of that line" and have it examined by metallurgists, she told Daily GPI.
"Everyone will be working, of course, to
try to get this [line] back in service. But the safe operation of the
pipeline is of premiere importance." The three
lines shared the same right-of-way.

"We're just now able to start looking at exactly what happened, and how to
get that one line back in service,"
Klinger said. "Our metallurgist is on his way right now. I know he's going to
meet with the NTSB when they're
examining the 50-foot section of pipe that's out of the ground" as a result
of the explosion. "I think the company
also wants to decide what types of tests can be done on this line. It's not
piggable."

The NTSB, which has set up a command center in Carlsbad, NM, declined to make
any preliminary speculation
about the cause of the explosion. "It's much too early for us to even think
about the cause of this accident. We're
only dealing with the facts...Right now, we're documenting the pipe itself
and surveying the land. We're going to
look at the chronology of when the [emergency] calls came in..... document
damage to vehicles, and injuries,"
said NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway.

"Probably at this point we're looking at nine months to a year, maybe more"
before the results of the investigation
are publicly disclosed, Holloway noted.

The rupture occurred at 5:30 a.m. MDT in the underground line near the Pecos
River crossing, which is about 30
miles south of the Carlsbad Caverns National Park in a spot popular with
local campers and fishermen. The blast
tore a crater in the earth about 86 feet long, 46 feet wide and 20 feet deep.

According to preliminary reports, the pipeline was underground at the point
of rupture, sending two sections of pipe,
each about 20-feet long, flying hundreds of feet. The gas then ignited and
shot flames from the broken pipe toward
sleeping campers. The NTSB estimated there was a gap of 50 to 60 feet between
broken ends of the pipeline at
the site. The fire burned for about 40 minutes before El Paso workers
manually shut off pipeline valves.

Ten members of two families were burned to death in the blast. The families,
who were related by marriage, were
camping on public land along the river near where the pipeline emerged from
the ground to cross the Pecos in an
aerial crossing alongside a bridge. Six were pronounced dead at the scene and
four others died at Texas hospitals
Saturday night. The dead included five children under the age of six,
including six-month-old twins. Two adults were
listed in critical condition Monday at a hospital in Lubbock, TX.

The ruptured pipeline, which El Paso said was constructed in 1950, is one of
four that runs along the southern branch
of El Paso's pipeline system. There is an adjacent 30-inch pipeline and
another 26-inch pipeline. The fourth, a
16-inch pipeline, was abandoned and is not available for service, Wallace
said. El Paso and federal officials are
particularly interested in the integrity of the second 30-inch pipeline that
ran close to the broken line.

Wallace said that none of the company's customers had been cut off of
service, but they were receiving gas as
reduced levels.

She also said that on Aug. 2, a "patrol" inspection, either done by air or
vehicle, was conducted on the pipelines
located near the Pecos River by El Paso officials and no problems were found.
El Paso conducted the last
corrosion test in February and no problems were found then either. Visual
inspections are conducted on all of the
system's pipelines once a month, she said, and the company follows all
federal pipeline requirements for inspections.

Asked whether El Paso planned to change its inspection system immediately,
Wallace said that she did not think
so, but said that if the NTSB review finds something that needs to be
changed, the company will do whatever needs
to be done immediately.

"These situations are so rare," she said. "We don't feel that we need to
change what we're doing now. But if the
situation warrants, we certainly will make any changes necessary."

El Paso is working with family members to take care of their immediate needs,
including hotel accommodations,
food, travel arrangements and medical treatment. The company also is
providing additional services as needed.

"This is a tragic accident and our heartfelt condolences go out to the
families involved," said El Paso Energy President
William Wise. He said the company was working with the NTSB "to investigate
diligently all matters surrounding this
 accident and to establish its cause as quickly as possible."

The fallout of the explosion is expected to extend all across the country, as
federal legislators consider more
stringent pipeline rules following an explosion in Bellingham, WA, that
killed three in June 1999. Locally, Carlsbad
Mayor Gary Perkowski said that he wanted to find out what happened and keep
it from ever happening again.

That reaction was echoed by the New Mexico governor. "I have a lot of
questions," said Johnson. "What is the
reliability of these pipelines? What went wrong? Was it preventable?"

Meanwhile, RSPA was sifting through its history to determine whether the El
Paso blast was the biggest pipeline
disaster on record in terms of fatalities.

Timeline:

5:26 a.m. Aug. 19: El Paso Natural Gas' automated computer reading of the
pressure in the pipeline indicates
673.5 pounds per square inch.

Around 5:30 a.m.: An El Paso Natural Gas employee bow-hunting in the area
sees a large fireball at the scene.

5:30 a.m.: El Paso Natural Gas' automated computer reading of the pressure in
the pipeline drops to 377.19
pounds per square inch.

5:30 a.m.: Carlsbad Fire Department responds to the emergency.

6:12 a.m.: Carlsbad Fire Department arrives at the scene.

6:21 a.m.: El Paso Natural Gas workers shut off the gas line using manual
valves.

Between Jan. 1 and June 30 of this year, there have been 40 transmission
pipeline incidents, according to the OPS.
Fourteen were caused by either external or internal corrosion; 11 were
damaged by outside forces; three were due
to construction or material defects; and 10 were unknown. There was only one
fatality until June 30 of this year on
transmission pipeline incidents, which was caused by an outside force. Eleven
people had been injured through June.

In August 1999, OPS sent a warning letter to El Paso, citing it for a number
of pipeline safety violations in Arizona.
The OPS did not impose a civil fine on El Paso, but it advised the pipeline
that "should you not correct the
circumstances leading to the violation, we will take enforcement actions when
and if the continued violation comes
to our attention."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

El Paso Blast May Cinch Tough Pipe Safety Bill

The explosion on El Paso Natural Gas' system, which killed 10 people over the
weekend, may give Congress
the added boost to pass a tough pipeline safety reauthorization bill when it
returns from recess in September,
Capitol Hill insiders said Monday.

"This just sadly proves why Congress needs to act as soon as it returns [on
Sept. 5] to pass the Pipeline Safety
 Improvement Act before any more innocent lives are taken," said a
spokeswoman for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

In June, Chairman McCain's Senate Commerce Committee voted out the Pipeline
Safety Improvement bill that
would, among other things, give states inspection and oversight authority
over interstate pipelines; require
interstate pipelines to consult with states about their integrity plans;
create stiffer penalties for pipeline safety
transgressors; and offer protection to whistle-blowers who report pipeline
violations. McCain proposed the
agressive safety bill following the product pipeline explosion in Bellingham,
WA, that killed three in June 1999.

"McCain has always been determined to pass this bill this year, but this
obviously sadly strengthens that resolve,"
she said. He "will make a determined effort for this to happen," but whether
it's brought up for a vote on the Senate
floor will be up to Senate Leader Trent Lott (R-MS), the McCain spokeswoman
said.

"I have no doubts" that the Senate will push for pipeline safety when it
returns, said Terry Boss, vice president of
environment, safety and operations for the Interstate Natural Gas Association
of America (INGAA).

On the House side, a companion to McCain's bill has been introduced, as well
as a number of other pipeline safety
measures, but most are at the subcommittee level. But the issue could pick up
steam in the wake of the El Paso
blast. "We must examine why this accident occurred and ensure that it must
never happen again," said Rep. Joe
Skeen (R-NM).

"Definitely it's a tragic situation," Boss said, referring to the explosion
near Carlsbad, NM, which reportedly left a
crater about 20 feet deep, 46 feet wide and 86 feet long. Five of the 10
fatalities were children, who were spending
a weekend camping and fishing with their family along the Pecos River.

The political fallout from the disaster was being assessed in Washington D.C.
yesterday. "Any kind of incident
has political ramifications.....We're just not sure how this is going to
'directly impact'" pending legislation and
regulations, Boss noted.


Shirley,

Yes, It will be  a swap of one machine for another.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/17/2000 12:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: high-end desktop computing?

Vince:

Is this ok to order?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000
12:17 PM ---------------------------

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
03/17/2000 09:34 AM
To: Mark Davidson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: high-end desktop computing?

Mark-

Shirley will order an 800 MHZ machine with 512 MB of RAM, and a large (17"+)
flat-screen monitor for me.

Clayton

Mark Davidson
03/17/2000 08:52 AM
To: Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: high-end desktop computing?

Clayton-

Sorry it took so long to get back to you.  There are a couple of things to
keep in mind:

 -Enron IT supports Enron equipment.
 -All equipment must be purchased through "Enron IT Purchasing"

Our current high end desktop is a 800 MHZ pentium III machine with 128M of
RAM.  You can bump up the RAM to whatever you feel is appropriate. When the
1GHz processors come out (in the very near future) that will become our
standard.

What we want to avoid is getting equipment that we do not have a image for.
The "image" is the complete package of software that we put on a machine when
it is deployed.  If you go out and buy a machine that we do not have a image
for, we can't support it for a multitude of reasons.

Hopefully this answered your questions/concerns.

If not, please call me so that we can discuss this further.

Thanks

Mark Davidson
x 39038

Clayton Vernon
03/14/2000 03:39 PM
To: Mark Davidson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: high-end desktop computing?

Mark-

I have developed a model for Enron that requires ultra-high-end PC
performance (it does many calculations in Excel), and my boss has authorized
me to buy whatever PC I need. I'm looking at the Compaq 850, but Richard (our
floor rep) says no PC's over the 600 series will be supported by IT. I need
to resolve this issue; we are sophisticated buyers, we know the type of
machine we want, and we have the money to pay for it.

Sincerely,

Clayton Vernon
Manager, Research


Well, there's your summo wrestler, a fan, wasabi peas, and I think a sea
shell.

Joya Davis@ECT
07/25/2000 08:04 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Requests from the Office

PLEASE SEE E-MAILS BELOW.  CAN YOU HELP HIM OUT?  I TOLD HIM NOT TO WORRY
ABOUT IT.

Joya' F. Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

----- Forwarded by Joya Davis/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 08:03 AM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	07/25/2000 01:37 AM

		 To: Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Requests from the Office

Hi Joya-

Please see if Kay Mann can help putting the list together.

I am a bad shopper, but I will try!

Cheers,

John

	Joya Davis@ECT
	07/24/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Requests from the Office

WE ERASED THE BOARD!  SO I GUESS YOU ARE OFF THE HOOK.   EVERYONE JUST WANTS
YOU TO HURRY UP & COME BACK :)

Joya' F. Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

	John Viverito@ENRON
	07/22/2000 09:20 PM

		 To: Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Requests from the Office

Joya-

Please send me the list of the things people had requested on the board of my
office, as I will be able to send things back with Alan.  As your gift me be
a bit difficult to send back now, think about something else and tell me!!

Thanks,

John


Ken--

We understand that you may be heading to an auction of the wind business.
We would like to speak to you about this strategy.  An auction seems to us
to be unnecessarily costly and inefficient. We stand ready, willing, and
able to negotiate a purchase with you, and don't believe that a lengthy and
cumbersome auction process will serve anyone's best interests.

We have a key meeting on December 20 with those interested in putting the
financing together with us for this deal.  Appreciating the demands on your
time, is there any way that we could get on your schedule for even 15
minutes some time prior to the 20th?  We are ready to hop on a plane and
come to you at a moment's notice.  Let me know if you think this can work.

Many thanks,
Katie McGinty
==========
Kathleen A. McGinty
Vice President, Asset Management
Natsource, LLC
1120 19th Street, NW
Suite 730
Washington, DC 20036
O: 202-496-1423 x229
C: 703-282-5472
E: kmcginty@natsource.com


Dear Gerald Nemec,

Option trading is now available at Datek Online-for just $9.99 plus
$1.75 per contract.

This new capability's highlights include:

?????A suitability test that determines the level of option trading
?????that's appropriate for individuals who seek to use our system.

?????A state-of-the-art online order entry system.

?????Real-time market and account information that helps our
?????customers choose sensible option strategies.

?????Most competitors charge quite a bit more for an option trade.*

To learn more about option-based investment strategies and their
risks, visit the Datek Online Learning Center. If you decide that
option-based investment strategies are right for you, complete and
send us your application and Datek will determine the level of option
trading that's appropriate for you.

Sincerely,

Datek Online Brokerage Services LLC
Member NASD / SIPC
www.datek.com

Of course, you can lose your entire investment and there is no
guarantee that you will realize your desired result. Therefore,
option trading is not suitable for all investors. Additionally, you
should carefully read the options disclosure document,
Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, which is included
with the application or you may obtain by calling Customer
Support at 1-800-U2-DATEK or by contacting Datek Online at
support@datek.com or by writing to Datek Online Brokerage Services
LLC, 100 Wood Avenue South, Iselin, NJ 08830.

*Based on a survey conducted on 9/1/00 among major online brokerages.

You were emailed because you are a current user of Datek Online's
Streamer. If you would like to be removed from our list, please
go to: http://datek1.m0.net/m/u/dtk/d.asp?e=Gerald.Nemec%40enron.com

#37984


Kevin-

Have a quick look before I send it out.


A;0041598;MPRSDNTN  ;014;008;N;Danny McCarty;Danny McCarty - (Approved);

;@@@@@@@@@


Looks like Justin has already contacted S&C.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Justin Boyd
	08/09/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FX Transactions

Gentlemen - please see below as well as the S&C memo attached.  I will also
send you a related email later.

Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:55
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 17:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


Mr. Galvan - I wanted to let you know that Mr. Lay is out of the office until
Monday, so he will not be able to see your e-mail until then.

Rosalee

GALVAN666@aol.com on 07/26/2000 03:10:24 PM
To: Kenneth.Lay@enron.com
cc: julie.mason@chron.com, osanchez@cnl.ci.houston.tx.us
Subject: Sports Arena Deal

Dear Mr. Lay:
             My name is James Partsch-Galvan. I am the Libertarian Candidate
for Texas Rep. 147. I do not support this new Sports Arena Deal. I was on the
winning side last year, and I am galvanizing to be be on the winning side
this year.
I find it very deporable that the Sports Authority cancelled its Board
Meeting tomorrow. This is another dirty trick that the Sports Authority is
making to make it harder for citizens to voice their opinions. This is one
more reason for taxpayers to vote no for any taxpayer funds to fund a new
arena that is not needed.
Sincerely, James Partsch-Galvan
Libertarian Candidate for Texas Rep. 147
http://www.galvan.org


HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:52:09 GMT
Content-type: text/x-oasis-csv
Connection: close

REQUEST_STATUS=200
ERROR_MESSAGE=
TIME_STAMP=20010410205209PD
VERSION=1.4
TEMPLATE=transstatus
OUTPUT_FORMAT=DATA
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_CODE=SPP
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_DUNS=959415852
RETURN_TZ=PD
DATA_ROWS=1
COLUMN_HEADERS=CONTINUATION_FLAG,ASSIGNMENT_REF,SELLER_CODE,SELLER_DUNS,CUSTOM
ER_CODE,CUSTOMER_DUNS,AFFILIATE_FLAG,PATH_NAME,POINT_OF_RECEIPT,POINT_OF_DELIV
ERY,SOURCE,SINK,CAPACITY_REQUESTED,CAPACITY_GRANTED,SERVICE_INCREMENT,TS_CLASS
,TS_TYPE,TS_PERIOD,TS_WINDOW,TS_SUBCLASS,NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY,OTHER_CURTA
ILMENT_PRIORITY,START_TIME,STOP_TIME,CEILING_PRICE,OFFER_PRICE,BID_PRICE,PRICE
_UNITS,PRECONFIRMED,ANC_SVC_LINK,ANC_SVC_REQ,POSTING_REF,SALE_REF,REQUEST_REF,
DEAL_REF,IMPACTED,COMPETING_REQUEST_FLAG,REQ
UEST_TYPE,RELATED_REF,NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG,STATUS,STATUS_NOTIFICATION,STATUS_
COMMENTS,TIME_QUEUED,RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT,TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE,PRIMARY_PROVIDER_
COMMENTS,SELLER_REF,SELLER_COMMENTS,CUSTOMER_COMMENTS,SELLER_NAME,SELLER_PHONE
,SELLER_FAX,SELLER_EMAIL,CUSTOMER_NAME,CUSTOMER_PHONE,CUSTOMER_FAX,CUSTOMER_EM
AIL,REASSIGNED_REF,REASSIGNED_CAPACITY,REASSIGNED_START_TIME,REASSIGNED_STOP_T
IME
N,SPP
01007304,SPP,959415852,EPMI,848921276,N,CONTROL/HILLTOP,SVR55,HIL345,"CISO","P
ACE",12,12,HOURLY,NON-FIRM,POINT_TO_POINT,PEAK,FIXED,W/O ANCILLARY
SRVCS,1,,20010407170000PD,20010407220000PD,6.9000,6.9000,6.9000,MW-HR,Y,SC:(SP
P:RQ);,SC:M;,,,,,0,N,ORIGINAL,,,RECEIVED,MAILTO:mark.guzman@enron.com;,,200104
07175856PD,20010407160000PD,20010410185159PD,,,,,Carolyn
Bonari,(775)834-4180,(775)834-4296,sppc.oasis@sppc.com,Don
Norman,,(503)464-3740,lester.rawson@enron.com,,,,


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/06/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           09/06/2000 09:47 AM

To: Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CIAC

Fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/06/2000
09:47 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           09/06/2000 09:22 AM

To: Robert Guthrie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CIAC

Robert, in response to your question, I don't know who the El Paso tax
contact is, but I'll find out & let you know.  Thanks again.


Steve,

I assume it's 9:00 a.m.  my time, Monday.
It works for me.

 I haven't responded in time to the
your message re Thursday. I had a few back
to back meetings in the morning and I read your message quite late
into the day.

Vince

Steven Leppard
11/10/2000 04:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince, Tani

FYI.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000
10:27 ---------------------------

	Calendar Entry

Research Meeting w/-Michael, John, Tani, Richard, Joe, Steve & Vince Kaminski
Brief description:
Date:
Time:

13/11/2000
15:00 - 15:45

Detailed description:

 Invitations

		Phone/Ext	Include
Chairperson:	John Sherriff/LON/ECT	37359	  Yes
Organised by:	Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT		  No

Invitations sent to:	Tracie McCormack
Kirsten Nelz
Steven Leppard

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


Gerald,

Maybe this is what you were looking for  -  this is the only Fixed Price
Election language we use in Confirmations (only Flex Price deals).

Please let me know if I can help you further.

Regards,
Ellen
x54099


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Russell on call

Date:		6/12/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Jon, I'm attaching a memo sent to me by one of my
previous Enron people in China.  Lillian Li no longer
works for Enron and was not available to help us in
Beijing (she got married and will be moving in June).
Anyway, she has this travel agency friend who has
recommended stuff for Shanghai and Beijing.  It's all
spelled out in the attachment.  For 3 days in
Shanghai, for ($285 per person for 3 days and
nights),$90 USD a day per person which includes hotel,
meals, transportation, tickets, etc. sounds
reasonable.  What do you think?  I do like the sight
seeing she recommended.

Then, in Beijing for 7 nights in a good hotel,
sightseeing, transportation, tickets, tour guide, etc.
for ($525 per person for 6 days and nights), $88 per
day per person didn't sound bad either.  Here in
Beijing I like the sightseeing she recommends.  Again,
what do you think?

What she failed to tell me was the cost of the airline
ticket from Shanghai to Qingdao to Beijing.  Could you
check on that for us?

If there is a better way to skin this cat (no pun
intended, just that all these Nancy boys are afraid of
the chinese food and all) please advise.

Congrats,look forward to seeing and hearing from you.....Dan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 - Trip.doc


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a forced outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this outage. Any
questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 112601.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


Ben-

It was good to see you- I'll give you a buzz next time I'm in Houston.

Let me know if you have any questions about UT, BSchool, app process, etc...

I gave your email to Loncto-

Here's to a lot of golf next year if you decide to come to Austin!

D


Jeff:

Thanks for your attention on this matter. I am leaving for China tomorrow
(Saturday 6/9) and will return on Saturday 6/16. I am confirmed to depart for
Sao Paulo on 6/19. Is there a phone # I can reach Joe Kaischkill on? If so, I
would contact him when I get settled in in Shanghai. On the contrary, I can
be reached on Monday 6/18 in my office in Miami at 305-443-6665 or on my
mobile 305-773-0319.

Thanks again for your help.

Best regards,
Joe Alcantara

On Fri, 08 June 2001, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

>
>
> Joe:
>
> You can expect a call from Joe Kaischkill about setting up a meeting in Sao
> Paolo to discuss your proposal.  Let me know if there's anything else that
> I can do to help.
>
> All the best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>                     mail@joesdesk
>                     .com                 To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
>                                          Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     06/04/2001           cc:
>                     03:30 PM             Subject:     Brazil
opportunity-completed
>                                          one-pager
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
> I did a final draft of the one-pager I sent you earlier. I am attaching it
> here as it communicates the idea better. Please send along to whomever you
> feel should recieve it and let me know when I can contact who & when. I
> will be traveling on Friday am for 1 week.
> Thank you.
> Joe Alcantara
>
>
>
> (See attached file: DearJeffreyIII.doc)


No, but thanks for the offer.
Ben


Valery,

I may be in Dallas in the next few weeks.
I shall probably come to Dallas one Friday.
 I shall let you know well in advance.

Vince

"Valery Kholodnyi" <vkholod1@txu.com> on 01/04/2001 08:29:37 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: My model for spikes

Dear Dr. Kaminski,

I would like to apologize for the delay responding, I was on vocation.

Thank you very much for your interest in my work and for your suggestion to
meet
for lunch/dinner. I will be truly happy to do so. In this regard could you
please let me know what day might be convenient for you. Since I am going to
fly
from Dallas, I would like, if possible, to plan it in advance.

I look forward to hearing from you and to seeing you soon.

Sincerely,
Valery Kholodnyi


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  ClearCase Patch
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This patch will resolve several issues involving the MVFS (ClearCase
file system.)
Backout: Remove the patch
Contact(s):  Troy Beyer  713.345.8316  713.406.1782

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 4/28/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London  thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  ISDN Calling Name and Number
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for number and name to appear on telephone displays.  If
testing is successful,
permanent changes will be put into effect at a later date.  These will not be
service affecting.
Backout: Unbusy trunk group.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard       713-853-0558
  Harold Williams      713-345-8917

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


>From: "Jack Oliver, Deputy Chairman, RNC" <gopteamleader@gopteamleader.com>
>To: "mtaylo9@lsu.edu" <mtaylo9@lsu.edu>
>Subject: Call Your Senators: Pass The President's Growth Plan
>Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 04:36:17 -0500
>
>
>
>"Congress and the President must act again to help our economy and to
>prevent the situation from worsening. We must get our workers back to work
>and strengthen our businesses so that they can continue to be productive
>and hire more employees." House Speaker Dennis Hastert to Congressional
>Republicans, November 19
>
>In the aftermath of September 11, our economy needs a boost.  President
>Bush and Members of Congress agree on the necessity of an economic stimulus
>package, yet there has been no package passed by the Senate.
>
>President Bush has proposed an economic stimulus package that provides
>needed assistance NOW without significant increases in unemployment, state
>mandates and business taxes.  The President wants the Senate to pass a bill
>that focuses on job creation instead of creating new taxes on employers or
>new costs on states.
>
>CALL YOUR SENATOR(S) TODAY, and tell them to support the President?s
>economic growth plan.
>
>Senator John Breaux (D-LA)  Phone  (202) 224-4623
>
>Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA)  Phone  (202) 224-5824
>
>Please also take the time to FORWARD THIS MESSAGE to everyone you know who
>will help the President get the economy moving again.
>
>To contact your Senators, go here
>http://www.gopteamleader.com/findsenators.asp
>
>The debate over economic stimulus packages is plainly explained in a
>November 16th op-ed appearing in the Washington Post: "The President wants
>to create more jobs, while the Senate democrats propose entitlements.  If
>you were unemployed, which would you prefer?"  ("Tax Cuts Are the Best
>Stimulus" by R. Glenn Hubbard).  The full article appears below and is
>reprinted at
>http://www.gopteamleader.com/hubbard.asp
>
>Tell your Senators TODAY that you'd prefer job creation.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Jack Oliver
>Deputy Chairman, Republican National Committee
>
>
>************************************************
>
>Tax Cuts Are the Best Stimulus
>
>
>By R. Glenn Hubbard
>
>Washington Post
>Friday, November 16, 2001; Page A47
>
>
>With most indicators of economic production, such as employment and
>purchasing, showing further decline in October, some have argued that
>President Bush's growth plan would have little stimulative effect. They
>prefer the Senate Democrats' plan, on the grounds that spending is a better
>way to revive the economy.
>
>Permit me to differ. The president's plan, included in the stimulus plan
>passed by the House, addresses the nation's underlying economic problems.
>If enacted, the tax cuts will quickly deliver a boost to move the economy
>back toward its long-run growth path. The plan, it is estimated, would
>result in 300,000 more jobs and add half a percentage point to the 2002
>growth rate.
>
>Here's how tax cuts help stimulate the economy. Tax cuts for individuals
>give them more money to spend and invest. Tax cuts for business for three
>years -- long enough to have a serious effect -- would make investment less
>expensive, so businesses would be encouraged to buy equipment, increase
>production and expand employment.
>
>It is a major fallacy to praise new spending plans as "stimulus." This
>ignores the fact that a dollar spent by the government is one fewer that
>can be spent by private businesses. Furthermore, new spending programs
>almost never go away, and they lead to more inflexible regulation of the
>economy. New spending programs are not only unlikely to make the economy
>grow, they also are an undesirable response to terrorism risks.
>
>Instead, it is important to take advantage of the flexibility and
>innovation of the private sector. This will reduce the negative effects on
>job growth as part of our necessary response to terrorism.
>
>The real underlying economic problem is that the terrorist attacks took a
>direct toll on the economy and, more important, on the confidence of
>American households and firms. The combined effect tipped a fragile rate of
>economic growth into negative territory. But the attacks did not undermine
>long-term productivity growth, so economic fundamentals remain strong.
>
>The challenge is simply to restore the health of the economy quickly. And
>Congress needs to do so in the way that will be most beneficial. Assistance
>for dislocated workers is important, and the president has already proposed
>an aggressive package to provide it. But spending should not be confused
>with economic stimulus.
>
>The basic source of uncertainty and loss of consumer confidence is fear
>over job loss, and the fact is that additional spending, even on
>unemployment insurance won't give people jobs. Indeed, the excessive
>expansion of unemployment insurance proposed by the Senate would actually
>increase unemployment, because it would discourage job applicants from
>accepting new positions. Moreover, the Senate bill would err by raising
>taxes on employers -- exactly the wrong thing to do at this moment.
>
>Until one addresses the underlying source of the uncertainty, there will be
>no guarantee that hemorrhaging federal dollars will do any good. Lower tax
>rates are the best way to create jobs and make large and small businesses
>grow. Acceleration of future tax cuts, which Congress has already chosen,
>will help the economy.
>
>Despite the repeated claim that only poor households will spend additional
>income, evidence indicates almost all households spend about the same
>percentage of their tax cuts. Business tax relief is essential because it
>encourages firms to expand investment and employment. With tax cuts, firms
>would be able to replace existing machines with more productive ones,
>precisely the kind of change that frees up funds to hire more workers.
>
>The economy needs help now. The president wants to create more jobs, while
>the Senate proposes new entitlements. If you were unemployed, which would
>you prefer?
>
>The writer is chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers.
>
>(Reprinted by permission of the author)
>
>************************************************
>
>Paid for by the Republican National Committee.
>
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter, simply click here:
>http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a31344a56465125a0
>
>To subscribe to this newsletter, please click here:
>http://www.gopteamleader.com/signup.asp
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I forwarded your request to Luchas Johnson.  He runs the G-Daily-Est book.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
11:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           12/08/2000 10:56 AM

To: Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: G-Daily-Est deals that need to be fixed

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
12/08/2000 10:46 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: G-Daily-Est deals that need to be fixed

Hi again Darron

Here are some more deals that need to be flipped out of the G-DAILY-EST book,

QC3611.1
QC4110.1
QC4394.1
QC4496.1
QC4506.1

Can you please also go through this book to see if there are any more deals
between ECC and another counterparty.  These need to be fixed right away this
morning as I need to invoice and settle them today.  Please call me if you
aren't the person who handles this book, and please forward this message on
to the person who does.

Thanks for your help
Stacey


So far so good.

"Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com> on 04/16/2001 06:23:07 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "'rvicens@deltapower.com'" <rvicens@deltapower.com>

Subject: RE: Delta Power status

Assuming that is 1pm central, that is fine with Paul, Hastings.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 6:30 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
Cc: Lang, Gregory F.; 'ccampbell@kslaw.com'; 'jkeffer@kslaw.com';
'rvicens@deltapower.com'; 'iparker@freshfields.com';
Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Delta Power status

Hi there,

I suggest a brief status call tomorrow at 100 central to assess where we
are and what we need to finish.  How does this time work for everyone?

Thanks,

Kay

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/16/01 19:23:15
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


Following is from today's Inside FERC.  The Commission rejected Phase III b/c
Transco filed contracts for 210,000dth/d, representing firm commitments,
rather than for the 404,000/dth/d proposed in the original application.  The
delay in filing was caused by the protracted negotiations over siting
between Transco and the State of New Jersey.  The rejection leaves a gap in
the capacity needed to serve the NY/NJ market and may improve the
chances for success of the other proposed projects in the NYC area sponsored
separately by Duke, ElPaso, Iroquois and jointly by Duke/Williams/KeySpan.

Please let me know if you need any additional information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. will have to start the FERC approval
process all over again for
more than half of its originally anticipated MarketLink capacity. In an April
26 order, the commission said
previously granted certificate authority for 404,000 Dt/day of capacity on
the expansion into the New York
City metro area has expired.

Earlier this month, Transco tried to persuade FERC to allow it to build
sufficient facilities to move the
gas it had under contract for the project,s phase three--only 210,000 Dt/day
of the phase,s planned
404,000 Dt/day (IF, 23 April, 4). But that request doesn,t square with the
commission,s Dec. 13 approval of
project phasing, said last week,s order (CP98-540). In the December ruling,
the commission said that
"should Transco desire to construct some configuration of the remaining
MarketLink facilities and
services that differ[s] from what has been authorized (in the Dec. 13 order),
Transco will be required to file
an application for a new certificate for those facilities."

As a result, Transco now has authority to build only 166,000 Dt/day of
phase-one capacity, scheduled
to be online Nov. 1, and 130,000 Dt/day of phase-two capacity, expected to be
in service Nov. 1, 2002.

"As the history of the MarketLink project amply demonstrates, we authorized
Transco to construct this
project on the basis that the capacity was fully subscribed. Now, almost
three years after Transco filed its
application, one year after we certificated the project, and four months
after giving Transco more time to
obtain contracts, Transco still does not have a market fully subscribing
phase three," said last week,s order.
Transco was required to show contracts by April 13 for the full 404,000
Dt/day capacity of phase three, and
when it couldn,t do so, certificate authority expired on that date, FERC said.

"Of course, Transco is free to file a new application requesting certificate
authority to construct and
operate the facilities needed" to provide phase-three service, the order
added.
In filings before FERC acted, the state of New York said Transco should be
given the go-ahead for
phase-three construction because "new capacity is needed to serve growth in
the traditional core market as
well as the rapidly increasing demand for gas to generate electricity in the
New York City area." While only
a small percentage of the contracted phase-three volumes-- 25,000 Dt/day out
of 210,000 Dt/day-- is
designated for delivery to New York City, the shipments into the region
"should help to alleviate capacity
constraints and bring down the high market prices that have been experienced
over recent periods," the
state went on to say.

Expressing the contrary view, Rep. Bill Pascrell in a short but pointed
letter expressed his opposition to
the proposal to build downsized facilities for phase three.


I have a link that looks like a lightbulb on my Lotus notes desktop.  If you
don't have it, talk to your assistant.  I'll call you at lunch or on monday


CES and CEM will still exist for awhile, maybe forever due to legal issues. I
wouldn't begin canceling anything as the Choice customers are still in CES's
name and we don't want any capacity returning or other problems. They should
begin to be transferred to NPC soon. Why don't you hold off for now. Larry
Friedeman (419/878-4760) is actually the last CES employee and can be reached
in his Toledo office through 3/31/01.

Chris Germany@ECT
12/12/2000 01:32 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES and CEM

I believe ENA is still agent for Columbia Energy Services and Columbia Energy
Marketing on several pipelines.  Rich Contos's (the only CES person I know)
last day is this Friday.  I left Rich a voicemail asking him if CES/CEM
should continue to exist as a legal entity on the pipelines.

As ENA, I believe I sould at least begin terminating the agency (and
liability) relationships.

Comments/questions??


Please send to Paul Addis at AEP, I lefft you a voicemail on Monday with his
number
Tel 614 223 1315
Fax 614 223 1331

I would also like to see a copy as it is going to be very difficult making
changes with 6 companies having to approve it..

What exactly are the changes?

Andy has my fax number

From: Mark Taylor on 05/16/2000 04:38 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: What happened with the NDA?

If the NDA is the Confidentiality Agreement for the Energy Trading Platform
(group of six?), I have marked it up with only those revisions I thought
essential (having discussed them with Andy) and am now waiting to hear back
regarding where I should send it (have left voice mail for Greg and Andy is
checking).

If the NDA is something else, please let me know.

	Louise Kitchen
	05/16/2000 06:10 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: What happened with the NDA?


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                    Tuesday, November 28, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217051
_________________________________________________________________

                         Close   Change  %Change

            FOOL 50   1,734.45   -30.31   1.72%
            DJIA     10,507.58   -38.49  -0.36%
            S&P 500   1,336.09   -12.88  -0.96%
            NASDAQ    2,734.98  -145.51  -5.05%
            (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 SPONSORED BY: NDB
 Apply Now and get $75 in Free Trade Commissions when you
 open your account with National Discount Brokers / ndb.com.
 Another way we take you under our wing.
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=217052

FOOL ON THE HILL: COUNTING LUCENT'S CASH
  Investors watching this company needed to go beyond the bottom
  line.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217053

ELECTION FOLLY 2000: STILL NO PRESIDENT, BUT...
  We don't have a president, but we do have the answers for our
  election contest.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217054

RULE MAKER: JDS UNIPHASE, THE THRILL OF DISCLOSURE
  A Fool listens to JDS Uniphase's recent analyst conferences and
  shares what he learned.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217055

TOP NEWS STORIES
  Get the latest on Dycom, Checkpoint, Amazon and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217056

OUR ANNUAL YEAR-END REPORT: INDUSTRY FOCUS 2001
  Our writers pick the companies and industries to watch in 2001
  in our annual year-end research report.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=217057

RULE BREAKER: IS ECHELON A RULE BREAKER?
  Does the company that links smart devices to the Internet make
  the cut?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217058

FOOL'S DEN: VALUING FOOD STOCKS
  Jeff Fischer has an appetizing analysis of food stock
  stability.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217059

DRIP PORT: WHY WE'RE KEEPING CAMPBELL SOUP
  Drip Port gives a long-term business a long-term chance to
  perform.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217060

WORKSHOP: A SHARPE RATIO SUMMARY
  The Sharpe Ratio is a useful Workshop tool for comparing return
  with risk. Todd Beaird enumerates the shortcomings.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217061

COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE: THOUGHTS ON THE NASDAQ "BEAR" MARKET
  The meaning of risk tolerance is defined by your stomach, not a
  piece of paper.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217062

FOOLISH FOUR: CHRISTMAS BONUS BONANZA
  One of the best problems to have at this time of year is how to
  spend your Christmas bonus.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217063

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: KELLOGG FOCUSES ON THE FUTURE
  The food giant's top exec doesn't want managers obsessing over
  near-team earnings numbers.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217064

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
  Join the discussions about how the Grinch stole Disney, and
  others.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217065

FRIBBLE: TAKING STOCK OF THE HOLIDAYS
  During this hectic time of year, don't forget to stop and smell
  the, uh, pinecones.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217066

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: BASSETT HOUNDS
  The furniture specialist barks -- and it bites.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217067

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217068
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217069
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217070
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217071
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217072

 SPONSORED BY: NDB
 Apply Now and get $75 in Free Trade Commissions when you
 open your account with National Discount Brokers / ndb.com.
 Another way we take you under our wing.
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=217073

ATTENTION, BIOTECH INVESTORS: NEW INVESTING GUIDE
  Learn to analyze the potential of biotech companies
  with our new biotech investing guide.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=217074

FREE BOOK FOR FOOLS ONLY!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=217075

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=217076

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-20743-2000-11-28_18-50-10-6781089_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-22:20:08(11-2
8-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


mwilczek@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 14:00  and  16:00 in the 1 December
2000
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify
prices:
PJM: 1:00 - 6:00, 13:00 and 22:00
OH:  2:00, 5:00, 6:00 and 22:00
HQ:  2:00, 5:00, 6:00 and 22:00
NE:  1:00, 2:00, 5:00, 6:00 and 22:00

Prices in the 2 December 2000 Day-Ahead Market are correct.


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/09/2000 11:12 AM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	10/07/2000 01:19 AM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Temecula, Calif., Forms
Committee to Study Electric ...

Temecula, Calif., Forms Committee to Study Electric Deregulation
Dave Downey
?
10/06/2000
KRTBN Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News: North County Times - Escondido,
California
Copyright (C) 2000 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News; Source: World
Reporter (TM)

TEMECULA, Calif.--Shocked by San Diego County's experience with skyrocketing
electric rates this past summer, the City Council has formed a committee to
study ways of shielding Temecula residents from similar jolts when the
deregulation wave washes into Riverside County in a couple of years.

The council appointed colleagues Jeff Comerchero and Mike Naggar to serve on
the electric needs committee, scheduled to hold its first meeting later this
month.

"Deregulation is something that is supposed to be friendly to customers,"
said Mayor Jeff Stone.

It turned out to be anything but these past few months as temperatures
soared, sending demand for electricity to power air conditioners and monthly
electric bills for neighbors to the south through the roof. The rest of the
state watched in amazement as the 1.2 million customers of San Diego
Gas&Electric sweated through a long, hot summer, serving essentially as
California's guinea pigs in the statewide experiment with electric
deregulation. They were the first to feel the effects of wildly fluctuating
wholesale rates passed directly on to customers.

"We're concerned that deregulation may have that sort of effect on Temecula
and our residents, and we would like to try to avoid Temecula residents
getting a double or triple bump on their bills," Naggar said.

"The electric deregulation took San Diego officials by surprise," he said.
"They were asleep. We now know what can happen, and we don't want to be
caught asleep."

One of the things the committee will look into is whether it would make sense
for Temecula to try to contract with an electric provider to bring in
relatively cheap power for its 54,000 residents. The area is served by
Southern California Edison.

San Marcos and Chula Vista have held talks with the Enron Corp. about the
possibility of providing power to their residents to hold down rates. Those
cities are studying the experience of Palm Springs, which in 1997 contracted
with Portland Gas and Electric to provide residents with a flat rate for
electricity for five years.

Whether such an arrangement would work for Temecula is anyone's guess, Naggar
said.

"If it turns out we can't do anything, at least we've gotten everybody's
attention," he said.

Naggar said the council has yet to form a committee charged with monitoring
San Diego Gas&Electric's proposal to string new lines across huge metal
towers through Southwest County, to relieve San Diego's electric rate
explosion. Cities and communities throughout Southwest County have rallied
against the project, saying they don't want the visual blight and perceived
health threat from having fat power lines buzzing 150 feet overhead.

The San Diego-based utility is expected to name a preferred route soon.

"I get about five or six e-mails a day on the preferred route subject,"
Naggar said. "It is a hot, hot, hot issue. But there is nothing for us to do
until they make a move. If they decide to go down the middle of Temecula, I
can assure you we'll make a move. If they decide to go through the (Santa
Rosa) Plateau, I can assure you we'll discuss it."

Temecula council members have been unanimously opposed to bringing new power
lines through, or near, the city since the project was unveiled about two
months ago. And, in September, City Manager Shawn Nelson sent off a letter to
the utility expressing the city's opposition to routes through the pristine
hills of De Luz to the west and the verdant Wine Country to the east as well.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 99

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Niamh,
I examined how VAR of "Financial Products" portfolio depends on
term-structure of correlations between BRENT and 61NY. Here are the results
(for positions on 11/6/00):

1). If we assume correlations of 1 across all forward contacts for Brent and
61NY
as well as between Brent and 61NY for all maturities,

VAR=$424,199

2). If we calculate correlations based on first 18 contracts prices for both
Brent and 61NY
together and assume longer maturity contracts are all perfectly correlated,
then

VAR=$1,868,949

3). Same as (2) but correlations are based on 12 first contracts, everything
beyond that is perfectly correlated, then:

VAR=$1,106,773.

Conclusion 1:  when we use higher correlations, VAR goes down (as we
expected).
Conclusion 2: correlations depend on how many forward contracts we use to
calculate them. We should use all liquidly traded contracts, because prices
for those contain statistically reliable information.

I chose 18 initially, what is your suggestion?

Regards,

Tanya.


Let's use EPSA.

Jim

Susan J Mara
05/14/2001 05:00 PM
To: rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
jklauber@llgm.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Tracy
Ngo/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: ISO Compliance Filing on Credit May Need Protest

On May 11, the CA ISO made a "compliance filing" for the April 6 order on
credit worthiness in the real-time market.  Whereas the FERC order REQUIRED
the ISO to get creditworthy parties -- the ISO portrayed it as an obligation
of the buying party.  Therefore, the ISO's letter says that the ONLY party to
come forward to provide credit support was DWR -- and because of DWR's
"fiduciary obligation to conserve the finite resources that have been placed
at its disposal", DWR REQUIRED access to the ISO's control room floor and
non-public data.  This is outrageous and just shows that the ISO has, in
effect, become a state-run, vertically-integrated utility. Question -- do we
want to protest this? Or sit by and see what the generators do? If we want to
comment, it would be due June 1.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


I will be getting in town at 7pm on Friday the 22nd.  I would love to go to
dinner, so if you make reservations for that night I can probably make it
around 8pm.  If everyone else can't do it on the 22nd, then I hope to see
you all sometime before I head back to California.

Jen

>From: Laura Jahnke <ljahnke@aerotek.com>
>Reply-To: ljahnke@aerotek.com
>To: Susan Edwards <susan_s_edwards@yahoo.com> , Ash Mace
><ashley.a.mace@williams.com> , Katy Hester <katyhester@hotmail.com> , Emily
>Hillegeist <ehillegeist@hotmail.com> , "Kelbarker@aol.com"
><Kelbarker@aol.com> , "Corinne_Connally@Dell.com"
><Corinne_Connally@Dell.com> , Laura White <LWhite@StageStores.com> ,
>lisa.gillette@enron.com, lodgesarah@hotmail.com,  elaina5@hotmail.com,
>sonderfan@hotmail.com,  kaseywalker@mindspring, sscott5@enron.com
>Subject: Annual Christmas Dinner
>Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 13:45:25 -0500
>
>Hi Girls!
>It's that time again.  We need to get everyone together for our annual
>Christmas Dinner.  I have spoken to many of you and tried to come up
>with a good time for everyone.  Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be
>a "perfect day", but how about Friday-Dec. 22nd?  Please respond and
>tell me what you think.  I have had a few suggestions for a
>place-Churrasco's, America's, Ruggles, Benji's, Sullivans-please send a
>suggestion.  Don't say it doesn't matter because majority vote will win
>and there will be no recount.  The time will probably be around 8 p.m.
>I know the 22nd is close to Christmas, so the 19th has also been
>suggested-but I am afraid not everyone will be in town yet.  Please send
>me your thoughts on the day, restauraunt, and if we should plan
>something after dinner.  I can't wait to see everyone and hope all can
>make it!
>-Laura
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


I'm sure she had things put together well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Sharon [mailto:sharonward@akllp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

Kay,

I think it was around 3p.m. on Saturday.  His name is Charles (Charlie).
His middle name is something like Coudair (sp?).  Tammy has been working
on making lists and folders of all of her outstanding matters, so
hopefully we are ready to make the transition.

Sherry

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Ward, Sharon
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

I called her office and they told me.  What time Friday?  What's his
name?

Do you have a handle on what she was working on?  I wouldn't want to
bother her about anything.

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Sharon [mailto:sharonward@akllp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

Thanks Kay.  I've call off the dogs.   I guess you know that Tammy had
her baby on Friday - 5lbs. 14oz!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 9:01 PM
To: Ward, Sharon
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

I received word that the switch deal is off. Thanks anyway.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Amanda,

Could you set up the following people with Read and Write access the the O:\Research folder.  Chris is moving all the information over to the new O: drive. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Thanks.

Mike Maggi
Andy Zipper
Larry May
Jeb Ligums
Dutch Quigley
John Lavorato
John Griffith

John


Mark,

Attached is the BP EOL amendment.

Stacy


We have received an executed Amendment to Guarantee Agreement from Great Lakes Power Inc., Guarantor for Maclaren Energy Inc., which increases the amount of the Guaranty.

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


FYI.  Status report from Watson, Farley.  Deborah, please print out and file.

     B.K.D.

----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/02/2000 07:49 AM -----

	jlim@wfw.com
	08/02/2000 06:14 AM

		 To: david.best@clyde.co.uk, Matthias.Lee@enron.com, Britt.Davis@enron.com,
Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com, Harry.M.Collins@enron.com
		 cc: ngregson@wfw.com
		 Subject:

Please see attached.

(See attached file: 18028916.doc)

 - 18028916.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
11/10/2000 04:17 PM
To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: looking for "Fat Tails" in time-series for NGI-SOCAL

Naveen,

I got NGI-SOCAL prices for prompt, prompt+1,...,prompt+59 contracts.
For each contract I calculated moving average based on 21 log-returns as
well as moving volatility. Then I calculated normalized log-returns:

[ return(t)-ave(t) ] / vol(t)

and compared the results to normal distribution.

I COULD NOT FIND Fat Tails!

Volatility changes a lot from day to day, so when people look at
log-returns (not normalized) it seems that there fat tails (big spikes, large
returns more frequent than normal),
which comes from the fact that volatility is not constant (at all).

See the spreadsheet is under O:\_Dropbox\Tanya

Tanya


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 09:53 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/14/01


The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for  4/18 and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\April_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a
duplicate copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'TCO Storage':  Shows the daily swings taken by CES on its (paper) storage
injection for the month.    Daily swings on TCO storage may be used to meet
some or all of the daily swings at delivery points off TCO as shown in the
"Daily Change' worksheet.    NOTE:  THis worksheet omitted pending resolution
of issues related to TCO storage.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 04-18-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Albert
Sent:	Tuesday, January 01, 2002 12:27 PM
To:	Solberg, Geir; Williams III, Bill
Cc:	DL-Portland Volume Mgmt
Subject:	DA ahead Cali schedule taken to the HA market 01/02/02

To whom it may concern:

For January 2, 2002, the in order to pass phase II within the CISO market, I agreed to take a schedule from the DA to the HA in NP15 with the APX.  The schedule is for 17mw on peak.  I built a load zone in PGE3 (ST Cali) and took the trade with the APX to zero.  Please be sure to reempliment the original schedule.  I spoke with Max @ the APX and the schedule was changed because the APX could not verify the schedule with their customer (Sierra Pacific Holdings).  If you have any questions please give me a call.

Bert


one of my friends is picking me up. i guess we will see you there around 7.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Rebecca J Newson" <rjnewson@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Rebecca+20J+20Newson+22+20+3Crjnewson+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	Friday gas needs

----- Forwarded by Rebecca J Newson/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on
07/18/01 10:23 AM -----

                    Al J
                    Reiter@DUKEPO        To:     blreese@duke-energy.com, dacluff@duke-energy.com,
                    WER                  dtedesco@duke-energy.com, Darren
                                         Stephens/NorthAmerica/EnergyServices@DukePower,
                    07/18/01             jmtaggart@duke-energy.com, James
                    10:15 AM             Stebbins/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         kglenny@duke-energy.com, Kim
                                         White/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         mschneider@duke-energy.com, PEC'S, rjnewson@duke-energy.com,
                                         Steven Fliflet/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         dlsmith@pplweb.com, amy.mulligan@enron.com, Steven
                                         Fliflet/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         jpritchard@citlink.net, David P
                                         Pell/PrimeSouth/NorthAmerica/EnergyServices@DukePower,
                                         jjbischoff@pplweb.com, Beck
                                         Mayberry/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, rspear@pplmt.com,
                                         tedmayes@aol.com, Tom Carlson/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         Michael Wells/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         wralkema@pplmt.com, MaryAnne
                                         Schneider/SLC-Control/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC,
                                         dbowers@duke-energy.com@DukePower, mschneider@duke-energy.com,
                                         Todd Hendricks/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Sherry
                                         Davis/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, George X
                                         Ouzounian/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Michael
                                         Kerr/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Tyler J
                                         Kristensen/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Christopher S
                                         Smart/SLC-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Allen K
                                         Nielsen/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC, Ted
                                         Romo/SLC-Mktg/EnergyTrading/PEC@PEC
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Friday gas needs

(Embedded image moved to file: pic08759.pcx)

 - pic08759.pcx


NewEnergy, Inc. has changed its name to AES NewEnergy, Inc.  This is a name
overlay in GCP.


fairly quiet market
 - marks.xls


No problem

	<Suzanne_Nimocks@mckinsey.com>
	12/07/2000 02:18 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tomorrow's meeting

I realized that we'll have quite a few people there tomorrow: Rick, Mary ,
Jeff,  you, me, Jon.  Do you have a problem if Dan comes too, or would you
rather not.

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


Bryson?


This e-mail will confirm the new time for the site visit by your company at
LV Cogen I & II.  The relevant information is as follows:

	LV Cogen
Site Visit Date	Monday, October 16, 2000
Site Visit Time	8:00 AM to 12:00 PM
Directions to Hotels/Site	See DealBench - LV Cogen (Section V through End) Due Diligence
List/Plant Pictures Section
Meeting Time/Place	Las Vegas Cogen
	1701 East Alexander Road
	North Las Vegas, NV  89030

	Meet Bill Williams at 8:00 AM
Enron Site Visit Coordinator	Bill Williams
	503.464.8958 (O)
	503.704.9801(M)
	bill.williams@enron.com
Enron Site Visit Team	Bill Williams
	Dan Hammonds
	Mark Mullen
	Plant Manager
	Plant Engineer

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for LV Cogen I & II,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.345.8992.


Please look over this and get back with me on any changes you would like to
make.

I am going to set up a new counterparty in our system:  Enovate LLC.  Under
this new counterparty will be 3 books in Tagg:  FT-ENOVATE, INTRA-ENOVATE,
AND FT-INT-ENOVATE.  The INTRA-ENOVATE book will hold deals such as the
Trunkline deal and will retain Rho & Drift.  The FT-ENOVATE book will be a
flat book only used for  the confirmation process (deals must be in an FT
book to be confirmed).  The FT-INT-ENOVATE book will pass Rho & Drift to the
interest rate group.  This book will be used for EMW related deals not
specific to Enovate.

The current entity Enron MW LLC will continue to be used and will have the
following books in Tagg:  FT & Intra NSS1, FT & Intra NSS2, and FT & Intra
TP.  FT and Intra MEH books will no longer be used.

The P&L will sum the 3 Enovate books to arrive at one number.  The other
columns on the P&L(NSS1, NSS2, and TP) will be unaffected.

I had planned on just adding the Enovate books, but think we really need to
set up a new entity as well.  I have run this by accounting and have their
approval.  Let me know what you think and we will start the process.  We will
have this completed by the end of this month.

Thanks.

DG
713-853-9573


Javier,

Do you know anyone that might be interested in this?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Joelene Whittaker [mailto:jwhittaker@stmassociates.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:51 PM
To: Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject: STM - Sales Director Referrals

Hello Paul,

My name is Joelene Whittaker and I am a recruiter with STM Associates. DTE Energy, www.dtecs.com/sitemap.html <http://www.dtecs.com/sitemap.html>, has retained us to assist them in placing two Director of Sales for Eastern and Western Regions. The Eastern position will be located in Ann Arbor, Michigan and the Western position in Denver, Colorado.  Both Director of Sales will report to the Vice President of Sales.

Qualifications of this position include a minimum of 5 years of sales experience and an additional minimum of 2 years experience with a trading company is preferred.  The successful candidate will have a strong understanding of U.S. Coal, Transportation and Electric Utility industries, including coal tolling, marketing and origination functions used in support of coal trading operations.  Solid experience in finding ways to capitalize on opportunities in the coal and transportation business is a must.  A background which includes Senior-level contract negotiations is required.

We are asking for recommendations from coal trading executives within the energy  industry.  Would you take a moment to consider colleagues whose experience fits DTE's profile and who you would deem as a high caliber candidate for the position.

I appreciate any help you may provide and look forward to hearing from you.  I can be reached at (801)531-6500 or via e-mail jwhittaker@stmassociates.com <mailto:jwhittaker@stmassociates.com>.

Regards,
Joelene Whittaker
STM Associates


Nidia:
This is not our current form.  I have asked Susan Bailey  to send you our
current form for this deal.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

	Nidia Mendoza
	06/12/2000 02:57 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: LC format sent to Ferrell International Limited

Please see attached doc.

If this doesn't satisfy legal requirements, please send me the latest format
as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Nidia
x3-4868
fax:  713/853-4868


done

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fleming, Matthew B.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Dinner

Wednesday night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Fleming, Matthew B.
Subject:	Dinner

When are we going to dinner?  Have you ever been to Paulies on Westheimer close to Shepherd?


My apologies if this has been done, but I'm in process of assembling list of products that UBS will be trading.  If this list has been compiled, please direct it to me.

I'm interested in getting the greatest granularity possible breaking it out by VaR portfolio name, trader, trading book, commodity, instrument, location, tenor, relative liquidity for each instrument expressed in contract/day (i.e. could impact holding period for VAR) and best risk mitigator.  (Regarding best risk mitigator, I'm not looking for liquidating position comments, but rather best hedge given curve location.)  This will help in directing correlation efforts for VAR.  See attached spreadsheet for suggested format.

Thanks,
Frank


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 20, 2001 5:00pm through April 23, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:        ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/20/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  SysAdmiral Users
Purpose: SysAdmiral terminal server icons on General Cluster will not be
available due to maintenance.
Once the maintenance is completed the icons will point to the new 2.3.11
production and development environments.
Backout:  None
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


was it fun?  was the area nice?  were you in the mountains of oaxaca, or
something?


Please let me know your Executive's availability for an EWS Budget Meeting on
Tuesday, May 1 @ 11:00 a.m.  Please note that the budget meetings will be
every Tuesday @ 11:00 a.m. for the month of May.  The meetings should be no
more than 1 hour.  I'll advise you of the location.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


FYR
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyer, Vance
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Philipp, Meredith; Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Q&A

Jim --

We would appreciate your blessing on this revised Q&A for the web.  All of the questions previously of most concern to you have been removed.  We have added in a question about related parties and basically put in the broad FASB parameters.  The Q&A enables us to stick in some fashion to the commitment Ken made on the last analyst call while also removing some low-end calls into public relations from people who have no idea what any of this means.

Thanks

Vance Meyer


Just a quick overview of observations/conversations from the South Sound
Technology Conference in Tacoma yesterday.  The conference was a regional
gathering on Puget Sound area leaders, telecom/tech, and educators.  Notable
participants were Rep. Adam Smith, Sen. Cantwell, and Gov. Locke.  Rep. Norm
Dicks' office was there but he was on a defense trip to Europe.

Statements from Maria Cantwell:
She hoped the change in the Senate will change the direction of the Bush
Energy plan and she endorsed the Feinstein/Smith price cap legislation as
much needed relief for the Northwest.
She described her support for competition in the telecom industry.  (while
not specific, it was a reference to Tauzin/Dingell which she didn't seem
supportive of).
She endorsed S.88, the Sen. Rockefeller bill to create tax incentives for
broadband deployment.

I didn't get any time with Sen. Cantwell, but I did spend some time with
Stacy Baird, her LD and her Chief of Staff (whose name escapes me at the
moment).  I followed up with Stacy on our conversation last week in DC and he
told me that he was interested in EBS' thoughts on telecom issues going
forward after Tauzin/Dingell fades.

Statements from Gov. Locke:
Gov. Locke wanted the state to do a better job reaching out to area
businesses and encouraged more public/private parnerships.  He gave the
example of too many streets being ripped up for fiber and that the state
should provide more leadership in managing infrastructure development.
The energy situation will be a critical factor in tech growth in WA.  He
stated that some high-tech companies are threatening to leave Silicon Valley
because of the energy crises and that WA may find itself in a similar
position.

Unfortunately I didn't get an opportunity to speak with Locke after his
remarks.

Statements from Rep. Adam Smith
He pretty much echoed Locke's concern that energy supply and prices may cause
the region to lose jobs.
He supported Tauzin/Dingell stating that he didn't think most people
understood the "seriousness" of broadband infrastructure issues.  He seemed
to believe that the RBOCs are the only hope for immediate DSL roll-out.

I spoke with Rep. Smith for about 10 minutes, mostly about telecom
competition.  He mentioned that he had spoken to "Enron's DC people" about
energy, but I was unable to ascertain if it was a positive dialogue or not.
On telecom competition he had much the same perspective as Rep. Boucher last
week (RBOCs need to invest in new facilities free of competitors), but
recognized the point that the RBOCs should not be rewarded for years of
foot-dragging after the Telecom Act.

I also made a good contact w/ Rep. Dicks' district director who wants to
follow up on telecom infrastructure/trading issues.

MEDIA:

I was approached by to reprters, TV and print, to discuss energy, Gov. Davis,
and his meeting w/ Pres. Bush.  I declined and directed them to Karen Denne.l

Takeaways:

The conference was a good opportunity to get our message out - I was able to
talk about the benefits of bandwidth trading AND the need to open the cable
monopoly,
I made some good contacts with Qwest, Terrabeam (laser last-mile company),
and the WA Software Alliance (Lew McMurran, their director of public affairs
mentioned he knew and worked with Paul Kaufman).
Energy is a HUGE issue in the tech community and it was never far from the
discussion.  I was asked on the panel, "If Enron is advocating a new
commodity structure for telecom like it did for electricity, can we expect
CA-like problems in the future?"  I think I answered it well, but I think we
will find it tougher to separate out businesses/messages in the future.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks, Scott


I have put together a file to check the official flag of the books. This is
in response to the email below from Gossett, please read.
I am asking that this file be run, printed out and left on my desk every
night for each person that officializes books.

The files are located in the Financial Books (The Family) folder.

Pipe Options Official Post Id's.xls
G-DAILY_EST Official Post Id's.xls
NG-PRICE Official Post Id's.xls

Kori ---- Please see me to set up you file

Thanks
Dutch

---------------------- Forwarded by Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 11:35
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett                           10/16/2000 11:03 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Official Books

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
11:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael E Moscoso                           10/16/2000 09:59 AM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Beardmore/NA/Enron@Enron,
Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Official Books

We have been tracking books that are not officialized on a daily basis.  This
list goes to Sally Beck and is reviewed at the end of each week by Rick Buy.
Rick has been vocal about taking corrective action if people forget to
officialize.   It is imperative that we take extra care to ensure that all
books are marked official each night before going home.  A control process
should be implemented immediately to absolutely avoid being on the list.

Please contact me if you have any questions (x-35242).

Thanks,
Mike


Jim,

	Per your and others' authority, on Friday, December 15,  I sent to Sharron West, the lead adjuster for Underwriters on the above-referenced three insurance claims, a request for an extension of time by which the insureds could filed suit against Underwriters through and including March 15, 2002.

	I will give you a call on Wednesday, and if you have heard nothing by then from Underwriters, we can discuss a follow-up.  I would greatly prefer to have some response before the intervention of the Christmas holidays.

	I will keep you advised.

	Britt


Start Date: 10/28/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102802.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041815.txt


Please find the attached EES Position Report for 7/21/2000.  I expect our
position to be about 300 contracts shorter than yesterday.  If you have any
questions, please contact me at x3-5070.

Thanks,
Monica


this one looks nice - although slightly expensive.  maybe we can go see it

L,
e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/11/2001 06:17:16 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Welcome to www.har.com! (4)

?
?http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?MLNUM=516080
 - Welcome to www.har.com! (4).url


Thank you.  Will you please convert the positions to contracts.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bike, Anne
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:37 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Mike Grigsby @ Home (E-mail)
Subject:	Counterparty Exposure  - Positions by Basis Locations

Mike: Attached is the data you wanted for the West Desk, only.  Credit can give you the information for the entire floor.  Russell Diamond has been called back to work on the project.  I would still use Tanya as the contact.

Now that all of the data has been collected for the West, we can sort and present it however you want on Monday.

Have a good weekend.

Thanks

Anne << File: Credit_10_26_totals.xls >>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	PRC-Interview

Date:		1/25/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


- Craig Jeffers_Resume.doc