United Way Scholars Press Conference, Today at 10:30 AM!!!!
Come see your United Way dollars at work building the workforce of the future!

Please join Jeff Skilling at a press conference today at 10:30 a.m. in Antioch Park to announce The United Way Scholars Program!  Your contribution is helping to provide 50 local high school students with college scholarships and funding for middle and high school technology programs designed to reach thousands of students each year!

USCAA Track & Field Championships, June 9, 2001
The Enron Running Club is seeking runners, sprinters, discus & shot put throwers, high jumpers and long jumpers to compete in the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  Participate in co-ed track relays & field events for all ages and abilities; showcase your energy and talents in a challenging, competitive, and fun environment; participate in an Enron tradition since 1994; experience teambuilding and camaraderie like never before!  For more information or to sign up, contact Cindy Richardson at x3-4770 or sprint to:  http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html

Dad's Day 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Dad's Day 5K and 1 Mile Family Walk benefiting The Prostate Cancer Research and Awareness scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.  If you're interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

The Caladium plants that are in the huge plant pots throughout the Plaza are going to be replaced and will be available for purchasing TODAY for $4.00 in the Plaza by the up escalator from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m..

Wild@Work Brown Bag: Digging Up the Past:  Archaeology at Armand Bayou
Join Armand Bayou Nature Center Executive Director, Ephriam Dickson, as he explores the prehistoric sites of the Clear Lake area. Discover how archeologists reconstruct past cultures from the artifacts left behind and learn how the first residents of Houston made their living.  [No shovels required.]

When:  Friday, June 8th, 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM
Where:  EB 5C2

Free Opera in the Park featuring Houston Grand Opera's Carmen, June 8-10!
Houston Grand Opera's sensational Multimedia Modular Stage production returns for three FREE performances at Houston's Miller Outdoor Theatre on June 8-10 at 8:30 p.m. Bizet's fiery gypsy Carmen, everybody's favorite femme fatale, ignites the summer in a powerhouse production that had audiences and critics cheering when it was first unveiled in 1998.

Houston Grand Opera's revolutionary Multimedia Modular Stage (MMS), with its giant "live" video screens, hydraulic platforms, and hundreds of rotating, colored lights takes the incredible energy onstage and transports it to the farthest reaches of the outdoor venue with a visceral impact equal to that of a rock concert!

Tickets for the reserved seating will be issued between the hours of 11:30am and 1:00pm through the Miller Theatre box office on the day of the performance.  Any remaining tickets will be issued one hour before the performance.

For additional information, visit HGO's web site at www.houstongrandopera.org. Also see volunteer opportunities below.

JOIN THE VOICES OF ENRON TO EXPAND YOUR COMMUNICATION SKILLS!
MAKE NEW FRIENDS!  EXPAND YOUR HORIZONS! ENHANCE YOUR COMMUNICATION SKILLS!  LOSE THE FEAR OF PUBLIC SPEAKING!  HAVE A GREAT TIME!
Day: Thursdays
Time: 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Location: Enron Building
For more information about The Voices of Enron, contact Melinda Pharms, Vice President, of Education via e-mail at <mpharms@ect.enron.com> or by phone at 713/853-3866 - Internal Extension 33866 or Kathy Willard, Vice President, Membership at kwillar@enron.com <mailto:kwillar@enron.com>, phone No. 713/646-7341 - Internal Extension 67341

Dance for All Ball
No Dance Partner Required!

Saturday, June 9
First United Methodist Church
1320 Main St. at Clay

7-9pm:     Dance Lessons by DanceArts   		 		http://www.danceartsballroom.com
9pm-12:   Dancing! with Live Swing Band. . .Chuck's Trio!

Cover Charge: Minimum $5 Donation
(All Proceeds go towards Building Materials for Red Bird Project which aids the economically disadvantaged & elderly)

FREE CHILDCARE AVAILABLE - Fun kid activities!

For More Info: call 5-6528

Kevin Hannon, Boys & Girls Club board member, invites you to join Enron employee John Cote at a Boys & Girls Club summer camp. John and Kevin are looking for commitments from some dedicated ENRON men & women. SPREAD THE WORD - SPOUSES, FRIENDS & OFFICE COLLEAGUES WELCOME - LAST YEAR'S CAMP WAS A HUGE SUCCESS! Details below:

WHAT: 	2nd Annual Houston Boys and Girls Club Summer Camp Weekend with Enron's incredible volunteers!

WHEN:  	Boys Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), June 22 through Sunday afternoon, June 24
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 20 through Sunday afternoon, July 22

		Girls Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 6 through Sunday afternoon, July 8
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 13 through Sunday afternoon, July 15

WHERE:	Willis, TX (75 minutes from downtown Houston -- just north of Conroe)

WHO: 	6-8 counselors per camp to chaperone 75 kids (ages 7-16)

HOW: 	Share all sports activities, including canoeing, hiking, fishing, organizing a talent 			show/bonfire/ghost stories, obstacle course, water balloon fights, softball, 				basketball, archery, football, etc.  (Cooking and clean-up covered by the Houston Boys & 		Girls Club staff.)

CONTACT:	John A. Cote at ext. 33830

Volunteers Needed for Bring Your Child to Work Day!

Bring Your Child to Work Day is Friday, June 29

Please email Jennifer Milligan if you are interested in volunteering and indicate your preference in the below activities:

Registration Table
Houston Police Dept / Stranger Danger / Fingerprinting
Outdoor Activities (SPCA pets, Balloon King, kids crafts, etc.)
Business Etiquette class
Business Art (kids' resumes, etc)
Lunch ticket sales/coordination (in Antioch Park)

WANTED! VOLUNTEERS FOR OPERA IN THE PARK

Carmen, June 8-10, 2001 @ 8:30pm nightly
Hermann Park's Miller Outdoor Theatre

Following is a list of volunteer duties to be assigned daily.

- Distribution of Stagebill programs with inserts of subscription forms and surveys one hour before the show begins.
- Distribution of giveaways items such as fans and plastic cups prior to the performance.
- Collection of surveys during intermission.

If interested please contact LaShabriel Keys at 713.546.0283 or lkeys@houstongrandopera.org.  Check-in for volunteers will be at 6:30pm nightly at the Volunteer Information Tent near the Miller Outdoor Theatre stage.

(Volunteers will receive tickets in the reserved seating section for the Carmen performance, free food, a t-shirt and a voucher for any matinee during the upcoming Opera season.)

The Enron Running Club and the Houston Corporate Athletic Association are seeking volunteers to assist at the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  There are many volunteer opportunities requiring little or no experience including timers, scoring, lane judges, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees, families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are willing to spend the day benefiting a great cause.  If you are interested or would like more information, please contact Kelly Lombardi at x3-8491.

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday's mailing.


This case is killing me!  1) I had to get before 10 AM today.  2) So much for
that leisurely 2-hour coffee and morning paper at the neighborhood cafe---not
today, thank you!  3) My nap!  Fahgetaboutit.

I'm going to be a wreck tonite.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/03/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

Janine Migden
05/19/2000 04:33 PM
To: Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S Laipple/DUB/EES@EES, Adam Cooper/DUB/EES@EES,
Greg F Bechert/DUB/EES@EES, Christopher S Barnum/DUB/EES@EES, Eric P
Niemeyer/DUB/EES@EES, Kevin Kovak/HOU/EES@EES, David Kramer/HOU/EES@EES,
Frank Bercan/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Tim Weithman/DUB/EES@EES,
Dana Saucier/DUB/EES@EES, George C Mossides/DUB/EES@EES, Jill L
Walton/DUB/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT Origination
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Lynnette Barnes/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES,
Laurie Knight/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Summary of Ohio Settlements

Sorry, I forgot the attachments.


Time -   2pm - 6pm
Where -  1400 Smith St
  Floor - 50
  Room - 50M (Executive Dining Room)

Please bring identification. Security will have your names.

Format:
2 hrs presentations -  Troy Blakeney, Overview of HFD (15 min)
   Dr. Persse, Overview of EMS and its Issues (45 min)
   Lisa Connolly, Overview of TriData Study & HFD/Community Discussions (1.5
- 2 hrs)

11/2 - 2 hrs -  HFD Discussions

See you Sunday!

Thanks,
Lisa


I think we can tell Rich yes, but please confirm that for me.  thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/16/99 08:26
AM ---------------------------

Rich Jolly on 12/15/99 06:38:43 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EES

Drew are we OK to go with this? We don't have any "confidential
transportation-related information in our office. We do have some operating
agreements and contracts but they aren't confidential that I know of.
Rich

Drew Fossum
12/08/99 05:18 PM

To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EES

EES is a marketing affiliate, so we do need to be careful about shared
computer systems, phone systems, staplers, paper clips, etc.  If Rich and his
office have no "confidential transportation-related information"  we might be
able to do it, otherwise, the hassles and expense of building marketing
affiliate firewalls might make it counterproductive.   I'm forwarding this to
the experts for a quick yup or nope on this.  Thanks. DF

Michel Nelson
12/08/99 05:24 PM
To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EES

Rich - Per your phone mail, I see no reason why an EES employee couldn't
office in your Region Office, providing he/she pays rent and we not break any
market affiliate rules (if they apply here).

Drew - Saving $ for Enron. Any issues I'm overlooking?

Mike


are you there?


Just go ahead and talk to Dave about the other industries.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 3:01 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	ENA/EES SIC Codes

John,

I surveyed the group.  In general, people are fine but we should ask for a bit more.  This should apply to US only as Milnthorp has already cut a separate deal with Janet.

EES Proposed that they own all SIC Codes EXCEPT the following:

Mining
Oil and Gas Extraction
Paper Manufacturing
Chemical Manufacturing
Petroleum and Coal Manufacturing
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
Fertilizer Industry
Rail Transportation

In our discussion with Dave, we suggested and he agreed that Primary Metals should be added

In discussions with the different regions:

ENA should add:
Refining
Grain Processing - Baughman and Luce
Meat Processing - Luce
Cement Manufacturing - Luce
Auto Manufacturing - Luce, Baughman
Aerospace Manufacturing - Tycholiz, Baughman
Heavy Industrial Equipment Manufacturing (caterpillar, john deere) - Baughman
Paper Manufacturing should include - pulp, board, lumber, etc.
Glass Manufacturing - Luce ( I suspect Dave will resist this because of their Owens Corning deals)

Let me know if there is anything else I should do.

Chris


We borrowed (deal227922) about 22,000 dt from CNG for the 28th and we will
pay it back (deal 227926) on the 29th.  ENA will pay CNG $.03 times the daily
balance on the 28th.  This gets confusing because we already have a parking
deal from the weekend that comes out in April.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 06:23 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/14/2001 05:49 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John
Larrea (E-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi
(E-mail)'" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>,
"'McNally Ray (E-mail)'" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen'
(E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote
(E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom Ross
(E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)"
<Chudson@iepa.com>, steven kelly <steven@iepa.com>, "'Anne Kelly (E-mail)'"
<kelly@hnks.com>, "'Chuck Cole (E-mail)'" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>,
"'Delany Hunter (E-mail)'" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "'DJ Smith
(E-mail)'" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "'Hedy Govenar (E-mail)'"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Maureen OHaren
(E-mail)'" <Oharen@hmot.com>, "'Mike Monagan (E-mail)'" <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
"'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Robert Ross (E-mail)'"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "'Ron Tom (E-mail)'" <Rtom@govadv.com>, "'Scott Govenar
(E-mail)'" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "'Susan Mccabe (E-mail)'"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, <rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<lchurch@epsa.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEP News Update

Following is the latest IEP news . including an Associated Press story that
quotes Jan's response to the State Senate Investigation announced earlier
today.

Thanks,
Jean

______________________________________
March 14, 2001, Wednesday, BC cycle
5:10 PM Eastern Time

SECTION: State and Regional

LENGTH: 941 words

HEADLINE: California lawmakers probe energy markets for manipulation

BYLINE: By JENNIFER COLEMAN, Associated Press Writer

DATELINE: SACRAMENTO, Calif.

BODY:

  State lawmakers announced Wednesday they will investigate whether energy
wholesalers manipulated California's power and natural gas markets to drive up
prices, a probe they say could lead to action by the state attorney general.

  Meanwhile, federal regulators said they will make several changes in
oversight to expand the West's power supply, including speeding approval of
natural gas pipeline projects and letting major power users who cut
consumption
resell the electricity they save.

  In California, Senate leader John Burton announced creation of a committee
to
investigate the state's volatile electricity market. A similar Assembly panel
has been formed to look into natural gas prices. Both expect to begin hearings
next month.

  The state has been struggling with a tight electricity supply since summer
due in part to high natural gas prices and power plant outages for scheduled
and
unplanned maintenance.

  Burton said he suspected electricity wholesalers shut down plants to create
an artificial shortage and boost prices. If lawmakers find evidence of that,
they will turn it over to the state attorney general for action, which could
include prosecution and court action to seek refunds.

  "Clearly, early evidence suggests that there has been market manipulation by
the power generators which led to rolling blackouts and then higher
electricity
prices," said Burton, D-San Francisco, referring to outages that hit Northern
Californians twice in January.

  California saw a modest 4 percent increase in demand in one year, while
wholesale power prices in that time rose 328 percent, he said.

  Committee Chairman Joe Dunn said the panel will ask energy wholesale
executives to testify, and issuing subpoenaes if necessary. Duke, Dynegy,
Mirant
and Reliant will be among major providers included, he said.

  Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers
industry group, said wholesalers will cooperate, but warned that if it
becomes a
"witch hunt" it could discourage them from building plants in California.

  "We believe this investigation will find nothing except that power producers
have been working around the clock to keep the lights on in California," he
said
in a written statement.

  Burton said the investigation could affect any rescue deal Gov. Gray Davis
crafts with the state's two largest utilities, Pacific Gas and Electric and
Southern California Edison.

  Davis is negotiating the state purchase of transmission lines owned by
Edison, PG&E and a third investor-owned utility, San Diego Gas & Electric, to
help Edison and PG&E pay their wholesale power bills.

  Lawmakers need to know how much of the money owed to the wholesalers "is
reasonable and how much of it was basically gaming the system," Burton said.

  The power generators blame the high prices on poor planning by California
lawmakers who voted to deregulate the state's electricity market in 1996.

  That law prevents PG&E and Edison from passing on high wholesale prices to
their customers. The utilities say they are nearly $14 billion in debt and on
the brink of bankruptcy due to wholesale power prices that have soared since
June, in part because of rising natural gas prices.

  Wholesalers have cut off their credit, leading the state to buy power for
them. California has committed $3.7 billion in tax money to such purchases
since
early January and plans to recoup it from utility customers over several
years.

  The California Independent System Operator, which oversees the state's power
grid, says generators imposed "unjust and unreasonable" charges totaling $555
million during December and January.

  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a strong supporter of
deregulation,
last week found that wholesalers have been overcharging for California
electricity, ordering 13 companies to refund $69 million. It gave the
companies
until March 23 to appeal.

  Attorneys general in California, Washington and Oregon are pursuing similar
investigations. U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., has asked the Justice
Department
and Federal Trade Commission to launch inquiries.

  Sen. Bill Morrow, R-Oceanside, said he wasn't "overly impressed with
investigative efforts so far on the federal level with FERC and others in
their
willingness to actually turn over the stones."

  Tom Williams, spokesman for North Carolina-based Duke Energy, expressed
annoyance at the news of a Senate probe.

  "It is wearing thin," said Williams, noting that Duke already has been
subjected to federal investigations and has testified twice before the state's
legislative energy committee, with no findings of wrongdoing.

  The Assembly committee is investigating natural gas pipeline capacity and
reserves. That committee plans to call gas company executives and FERC
representatives to testify.

  Because natural gas is largely regulated by the federal government,
lawmakers
are trying to determine whether they have authority to investigate market
manipulation, said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek.

  In Washington, FERC said it would overhaul its regulation of the Western
energy market to increase supply. Changes include:

  - Letting large commercial power users sell power they save at a wholesale
rate to be set by the commission.

  - Reallocating FERC staff to work on applications for natural gas pipeline
and hydroelectric projects.

  - Urging hydroelectric plant operators to examine how they can more fully
use
their available water resources by adding or upgrading turbines or making
other
improvements.

  On the Net:

  California ISO: www.caiso.com

  FERC: www.ferc.fed.us

GRAPHIC: AP Photos SC101-102

LOAD-DATE: March 14, 2001

                              10 of 28 DOCUMENTS

                   The Associated Press State & Local Wire

The materials in the AP file were compiled by The Associated Press.  These
materials may not be republished without the express written consent of The
Associated Press.

                     March 14, 2001, Wednesday, BC cycle

                             4:13 PM Eastern Time

SECTION: State and Regional

LENGTH: 203 words

HEADLINE: Senate rejects utility bankruptcy bill

BYLINE: By MARCY GORDON, AP Business Writer

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:

  A proposal that would have required California's financially troubled
utilities to pay their power bills even if they file for bankruptcy protection
was rejected Wednesday by the Senate.

  Senaourt to avoid their debts," Wyden said.

  The proposal had brought objections from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.,
who
said it would put the Senate in the inappropriate position of deciding the
"pecking order" of creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding.

  California's two biggest utilities, Southern California Edison and Pacific
Gas and Electric, say they've been pushed to the brink of bankruptcy by more
than $13 billion in high wholesale power costs that state law has barred them
from recouping from consumers.

  Both were denied credit by electricity wholesalers earlier this year. To
keep
the lights on for their customers, the state in early January began spending
billions to buy power on their behalf.

  Meanwhile, Gov. Gray Davis is negotiating with Edison, PG&E and the state's
third investor-owned utility, San Diego Gas & Electric Co., to purchase their
transmission lines.

  The governor says the state acquisition would give the utilities a
much-needed influx of cash and help them pay their debts.

LOAD-DATE: March 14, 2001

                              12 of 28 DOCUMENTS

                   The Associated Press State & Local Wire

The materials in the AP file were compiled by The Associated Press.  These
materials may not be republished without the express written consent of The
Associated Press.

                     March 14, 2001, Wednesday, BC cycle

                             2:37 PM Eastern Time

SECTION: State and Regional

LENGTH: 1326 words

HEADLINE: California's electricity crisis at-a-glance

BYLINE: By The Associated Press

BODY:

  Here is a look at developments in California's electricity crisis:

  WEDNESDAY:

  - Sens. John Burton and Joe Dunn announce a Senate committee will
investigate
whether power generators illegally manipulated California's electricity market
to drive up prices over the past year. If the panel finds wrongdoing, the
state
attorney general should sue for refunds, Burton said.

  The committee will ask wholesalers' executives to testify, and subpoena them
if they refuse, said Burton, D-San Francisco, the Senate leader.

  - A legislative aide says the Senate panel is considering issuing subpoenaes
for wholesaler documents on the California market and asking the companies'
executives to testify.

  - Duke Energy spokesman Tom Williams expresses annoyance at the news of a
Senate probe, saying there have already been several investigations and no
finding of wrongdoing.

  - Assemblyman Fred Keeley says the Assembly has formed a committee to look
into natural gas issues. Because natural gas is largely regulated by the
federal
government, lawmakers are trying to figure out whether they have the authority
to investigate whether supply and prices were manipulated.

  - Gov. Gray Davis' administration continues negotiations with Edison, PG&E
and San Diego Gas & Electric over the governor's plan to buy their
transmission
lines to help Edison and PG&E pay their debts.

  - The state remained free of power alerts as power reserves stayed at
healthy
levels.

  - Assembly members Fred Keeley and Hannah-Beth Jackson and environmental
groups plan a news conference to urge approval of energy conservation and
renewable energy proposals.

  TUESDAY:

  - Davis issues an executive order promising 20 percent rebates to Southern
California Edison, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and San Diego utility
customers
who cut power use 20 percent this summer.

  - Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill's office says Davis is underestimating
California's summer electricity shortage. The state faces a shortfall of 3,900
to 7,100 megawatts during daily periods of peak demand, the report says. One
megawatt is enough for about 1,000 homes.

  Using flawed state Energy Commission numbers, the governor is overestimating
how much new electricity generation will be online this summer, especially
early
in the season, and overestimates savings from conservation, the report says.

  - The state Senate plans to form a special committee to investigate whether
power generators illegally manipulated California's electricity market to
drive
up prices. The suppliers vehemently deny such allegations.

  - Citing skyrocketing energy costs, particularly in the West, President Bush
backs off a campaign pledge and tells Congress he will not regulate carbon
dioxide emissions from power plants. The decision comes after heavy lobbying
from the coal industry and is a blow to conservationists who see curbing
emissions of such "greenhouse gases" as key to reducing global warming.

  - State Controller Kathleen Connell says legal issues prevent her from
releasing records on state power purchases sought under the state open records
law by The Associated Press and several other news organizations. Connell says
she is awaiting an opinion by Attorney General Bill Lockyer on whether she can
release the information. Davis opposes releasing it.

  - Secretary of State Bill Jones calls for an audit of the state's energy
spending, saying the secrecy around the contracts for power purchases has led
to
a lack of oversight and accountability.

  - Proposals for two new power plants that could be running by summer have
been received by the California Energy Commission. The plants, which together
will produce 225 megawatts, will be fast-tracked through the application
process
to help meet higher electricity demands this summer. That's roughly enough
power
for 225,000 homes.

  - Officials say guidelines expected Wednesday on whether Edison, PG&E or
their customers will begin paying off the $3.7 billion in taxpayer money
committed to buying power on their behalf will likely be delayed.

  - No power alerts are declared, as operators of the state grid continue to
find enough electricity to meet demand.

  - Eight California counties expect to lose $11.1 million in property taxes
in
the next five months because the five energy producers who owe the money say
they are due even more from Southern California Edison. Some school districts
in
those counties - Imperial, San Joaquin, Riverside, Alameda, Contra Costa,
Inyo,
Kern and San Bernardino - say the defaults could hurt their ability to finance
expansions or repairs.

  - Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt meets with Los Angeles city officials to discuss
expanding a coal-fired power station in Utah to send electricity to Southern
California.

  - The United Farmworkers Union holds a protest in Blythe, a desert community
near the Arizona border, to protest a proposed power plant opponents contend
would pollute the air farmworkers breathe.

  - U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Palo Alto Democrat, asks U.S. Attorney General
John
Ashcroft to investigate whether electricity wholesalers engaged in unlawful
trade practices to drive prices higher.

  - A 510-megawatt power plant in western San Diego County moved a step closer
to final approval. The Otay Mesa generating project won approval from the
California Energy Commission's siting committee. The public 30 days to comment
on the plan.

  - Edison International stock falls 47 cents a share to close at $14.88;
Pacific Gas and Electric Corp. stock closes at $14.24, dropping 28 cents a
share.

  WHAT'S NEXT:

  - The Legislature considers dozens of bills to encourage energy
conservation,
increase alternative power and streamline power plant siting.

  - The California Public Utility Commission meets Thursday to consider
whether
to bar PG&E and Edison from laying off about 3,000 workers. The utilities say
it
could help them cut costs and ease their $14 billion debt. A PUC
administrative
law judge says the layoffs could cause response times to customer outages to
suffer.

  The PUC will also discuss restructuring the interruptible customer program.
The program gives big electricity users a discounted rate in return for
shutting
down their power when the state is short of electricity. After January's
rolling
blackouts, the PUC froze the program and said PG&E and Edison could no longer
fine interruptible customers for not complying.

  - An order from Davis requiring businesses to substantially reduce outdoor
lighting after business hours takes effect Thursday. Businesses that fail to
comply face a potential fine of $1,000 a day.

  - Attorneys for three generators and the ISO return to federal court March
19, when a judge is expected to decide whether power suppliers can be forced
to
sell to the grid.

  - Generators have until March 23 to appeal an order by federal regulators to
refund $69 million in January power charges. The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission required suppliers to justify prices exceeding $150 per megawatt
hour. It determined last week that some sales were priced too high, even
taking
into account high natural gas prices, air quality control costs and plant
maintenance.

  THE PROBLEM:

  - High demand, high wholesale energy costs, transmission bottlenecks and a
tight supply worsened by scarce hydroelectric power in the Northwest and
maintenance at aging California power plants are all factors in California's
electricity crisis.

  Edison and PG&E say they've lost $13.7 billion since June to high wholesale
prices that the state's electricity deregulation law bars them from passing
onto
ratepayers, and are close to bankruptcy.

  Electricity and natural gas suppliers, scared off by the two companies' poor
credit ratings, are refusing to sell to them, leading the state to start
buying
power for the utilities' nearly 9 million residential and business customers.

LOAD-DATE: March 14, 2001


Daren-

Sell to Tenaska Marketing
July Deal # 399791

Tenaska is indicating that the sale for July 2000 should be priced at $3.56.
Could you confirm our sale price should have been $3.58?

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on
10/05/2000 08:03 AM ---------------------------

Kristen J Hanson@ECT
09/15/2000 09:37 AM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Cleburne Plant

FYI- The purchase invoices have arrived and were given to Megan. Please feel
free to call Darren with any questions.
Thanks,
Kris

Daren J Farmer
09/13/2000 04:01 PM
To: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Cleburne Plant

Well, folks, the Cleburne deal has started.  The deal has not been finalized
through legal.  However, we were able to "get between" a few deals and make
some money before we finalized it.  The Cleburne plant was down 7/31-8/7 and
8/31.  On these dates, we bought gas from Tenaska IV Texas Partners and sold
to ANP and Tenaska Marketing.  Because things were not set up, I could not
enter the deals until now.  Please review the following deals and settle with
the customers.

Buy from Tenaska IV
 July 399763
 Aug 399773

Sell to Tenaska Marketing
 July 399791
 Aug 399797

Sell to ANP
 Aug 399814

The trading desk these are on is "ENA-IM Cleburne".

Kris - I have forwarded invoices from Tenaska IV to you via intercompany
mail.  (I received both invoices this week)

 I am sure there are questions, just give me a call.  Tanks.

D


I am from the Associate/Analyst department and I am sending out this test email.  If you are no longer an associate or analyst, or would not like to receive future information please let me know, so that I can remove you from the distribution list.  If there is someone you know that did not receive this email please have them to email me.

thank you,

jc


As always, thanks very much for your help.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001
02:31 PM ---------------------------

Chris Abel
08/11/2000 11:38 AM
To: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahmaan Mwongozi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: book admins

The attached list includes all Liquids book administrators, their respective
files and their phone numbers.  Please use this list to contact the
appropriate person when any originations issue arises.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Abel/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:31 AM
---------------------------

John Swinney
08/11/2000 11:17 AM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: book admins

Admin   DPR   Phone #

John Swinney  BAS0800  3-9111
   SpecII0800
   Spec0800
   Metals0800

Pat Stafford  0800dbrc  5-8638
   0800dist
   0800dist2
   0800rprc
   USUK0800

Michelle Nelson 0800blrc  5-8091
   0800cfrc
   RES0800
   FRT0800

Sony Wilson  Ngl_0800  3-7729
   EGLI0800

Anjali Abraham  0800btx   3-7434
   0800plas

Shifali Sharma  wti0800   3-5170
   wti_prepay_0800
   0800CAN

I think this is it.  If you need anything else, let me know

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 03:34
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           11/06/2000 02:29 PM

To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: VEPCO files Interconnection Proc. at FERC

On 10/27/00, VEPCO filed interconnection procedures at FERC (Docket No.
ER01-247)(Protests due 11/17/00).  These largely mirror CP&L's
interconnection procedures that were recently approved by FERC.  Therefore, I
do not think that Enron should protest or intervene.

Customer is required to pay for the cost of a new system impact/facilities
study if the study information/interconnection/upgrade costs change due to a
customer higher in the queue losing its queue spot.
System impact studies should take 60 days or less.  Facilities studies should
take 90 days or less.


CR and AL,

We bought 8000 from Richardson (#245410) at Teco - Lone Star Katy and sold it
to Tufco at that point on 5/12/00.  At 3am Tufco cut us on the sale,
resulting in only 6,000 flowing to Tufco for the day.  We need to find out
what PGE did with the remaining 2,000 we bought from Richardson.  Did they
deliverit to us at HPL?  Or did they cut Richardson?  Or, are they showing
that we have gas stranded at that point?  Please look into this and let me
know.

D


Jeanie,

I have a friend who is interested in an HR position with Enron.  She spoke of a rotational program for HR that I am not familiar with.  Do you know anything about the program, or who I might forward her resume to for an HR related position in general.  She has a few years of experience with a smaller firm, and I think she's looking for a company with a more established HR department like Enron.  Also, do you have knowledge of specific positions we are trying to fill in ENA?  Any info would be helpful.  Thanks.

Mat


fyi

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

-----Original Message-----
From: Van Pelt, Chris [mailto:CVanPelt@gigaweb.com]
Sent: 20 November 2001 16:11
To: Pickering, Mark
Subject: FW: Giga Proposal and Order Form.

Mark,
Below you will find Julies response to your initial questions.
I am looking forward to getting you and Julie on the phone to discuss the most
recent updates and lay out some of the questions and issues you are/will be facing.
Regards
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Giera, Julie
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Hurwitz, Bonnie; Van Pelt, Chris
Cc: Nelson, Gregory; Cecere, Marc; Jette, Susan
Subject: RE: Giga Proposal and Order Form.

My rating of Big 5 capability is:

Accenture:  Excellent with actual integration work; especially surrounding applications in the financial arena, manufacturing, consumer products.  Less experience with Oil and Gas; but good skills with newer web applications.  Prefer to take entire portions of the projects themselves, rather than work collaboratively with customers. Expensive.  Weaker on actual M&A strategic work, planning of an integration  or leading an entire effort like this.  Again, prefer to have control, rather inflexible in their approach, very dedicated to procedure and process - which is good to an extent...but tends to spend way too much time with administrative tasks and creating reams of paper and meetings than getting anything done when they are managing an effort like this.   Better choice for actual integration work, but should give them whole applications or departments (like finance, or distribution for example).  Not good with applications that require a lot of interface with other project teams and multiple business units.  Does not play well with others, so carve up chunks of the effort they can do on their own and you will get good results.  Lots of M&A integration experience as a result of their close relationships in the banking industry and consolidation that has been prevalent there over last 15 years.

PWC:  Very strong overall M&A strategy.  Great documentation of business processes for multiple vertical industries which can be very helpful in managing projects like this.  Project Management tools are strong, as is collaboration with other project teams or other business units.  particular strengths in integration work in financial services, manufacturing, telecomm; especially with applications like SAP and supply chain.  Price wise; middle of the pack.  Good choice for either role; but would recommend PWC serve either as project manager OR as integrator; not as both.  Would stretch them too thin with companies your size and complexity, I think.

Deloitte:  My favorite for M&A leadership and integration work.  Solid pricing, great business process documentation through templates they have created.  Very collaborative; works well with others.  Solid project mangement.   Experience with M&A for about 10 years; multiple projects and initiatives.  Good value for the money.  Particular strengths with CRM, Supply chain, ERP (SAP and Peoplesoft).  Vertical industry expertise in oil and gas,manuf, financial services, telecomm industries  Good value for money;but will also work to ensure that knowledge transfer occurs; so that internal IT personnel learn as much as they can.  Very customer friendly.  Good choice for either component; project management of entire merger - due to deep knowledge on process and knowledge data bases; also very strong integration practice.   If I had to choose, I would choose Deloitte to manage the project.

KPMG:  Weakest of all the companies in both project management and integration work.  Has not had a lot of experience with M&A leadership; does not have the strength of documented tools and business processes of the others.  Actual integration work would be ok, especially surrounding SAP, JDEdwards, Manugistics.  Project Management is ok, but there are better choices in the others right now.  KPMG is undergoing tremendous stresses internally right now; their European operation is really a loose federation of companies who are independantly owned.  The European portions are attempting to sell themselves to KPMG competitors; so internal politics detract from the ability of this company to focus on a large integration effort that may span 12 - 24 months.  Pricing is highly variable; depending upon business unit.

Cap Gemini/E&Y.  The old E&Y had an excellent M&A practice that had years of experience with actually constructing deals, managing efforts, and doing integration work.  Cap Gemini has some experience with actual integration of companies, as they have been involved in key mergers in Europe and have done some pretty impressive work with large, complex integration efforts.  Cap Gemini presence still very, very weak in the US; E&Y personnel are still in the majority - however the E&Y personnel in the US are mainly in the management consultancy area, very few of the actual integration programmers remain here; most  of that work is being done by the Cap Gemini side of the house in Europe.  Cap Gemini and E&Y have done an impressive job with their own merger; one of the better run efforts in recent years; so from that perspective they would be an interesting choice.  Tools and methodology for project management are strong, integration work in US has been weakened a bit since the majority of this work has been passed over to Cap, and Cap's strength resides in Europe.  Pricing is mid-range, good value for dollar.  Experience with the major ERP and CRM apps; less experience with supply chain and buying exchanges.  Would be a good choice for project management, and if integration work were to have a major European component, would be a good choice for that portion of a project like this.

Bottom Line:  Best Choices for Project Management in order of preference:  Deloitte Consulting, PWC, CGE&Y, Accenture, KPMG
Best Choices for integration work:  Accenture/Deloitte, PWC, CGE&Y (higher in preference if big European component), KPMG.  Warning with Accenture:  Does not play well with others, and does not collaborate well with clients.  If, however, Enron prefers to have a company completely manage the merger, and does not wish to be involved quite a bit in this effort; then Accenture is a very solid choice.

Best Regards,

Julie

-----Original Message-----
From: Van Pelt, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Giera, Julie
Cc: Nelson, Gregory; Cecere, Marc; Inquiry
Subject: FW: Giga Proposal and Order Form.
Importance: High

Some urgent questions from Mark Pickering.

Also, it sounds as though he would like a physical visit.
I've emailed to clarify that point.
Could your respond to this asap?
-chris

I have attached Mark's Vcard and his contact information below:

Phone: 713-853-7698
Mobile: 712-740-7406

Dear Inquiry Group:  Please log as Inquiry, Julie and I have coordinated already.
thx

-----Original Message-----
From: Pickering, Mark [mailto:Mark.Pickering@Enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Van Pelt, Chris
Cc: Chisley, Katherine; Costello, Lisa
Subject: RE: Giga Proposal and Order Form.

Chris,

I have 2 questions that I'd like you to put to your M&A groups.

1) How would Giga rank the big consultancy firms in their ability to work as overall co-ordinators for a complete company to company merger such as ours.

2) How would Giga rank the big consultancy firms in their ability to work as IT integrationc onsultants for a company to company merger such as ours.

I need these answers ASAP as we may use your results in our choice of company.

Given what I know now, I would also request that we have your M&A expert visit us early next week, as originally planned. I will also bring along the head of our integration team. Co-ordinate through Katherine.

Regards

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

-----Original Message-----
From: Van Pelt, Chris [mailto:CVanPelt@gigaweb.com]
Sent: 19 November 2001 18:38
To: Pickering, Mark
Subject: Giga Proposal and Order Form.

Mark,
It was a pleasure (as always) meeting with you last week and I am looking forward to working with you in the next year.
Attached you will find a revised proposal and subsequent order form for Option 2 as we discussed.

I've set up the call with Julie Giera (Mark Cecere will likely join) for November the 29th at 10:00 a.m.  I believe
you are aware of this and Catherine has put it on your calendar.

I hope that you will have a great Thanksgiving.
Sincerely,
Chris Van Pelt

Technology Advice. Business Results
Giga Information Group
www.gigaweb.com <http://www.gigaweb.com/>
Office: (972) 893-5325
Cell: (214) 914-0653
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information of Giga Information Group, Inc. It is intended for review only by the person(s) named above. Dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited by all recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.


<<021210910001[1].gif>>

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - 021210910001[1].gif


Haven't heard much from you..are you vacationing???  Are just having a big
Valentine's celebration?  I'll be lucky if I get to see my husband for
Valentines!  But I did get roses...from the HOUSEKEEPER!  She's so sweet.

Well the "Control" police hit me again today...but this time only one.  He
was checking out our german workers, to see if they were "illegals".  It's
so funny, they KNOW I'm not german, but there never question my legal or
illegal status.  It's because I'm American.  If I spoke with an Eastern
Europe accent, they'd be all over me.  Prejudices are world wide.
Obviously, there are either toooo many of these police or tooo little work
for them to do to keep bothering me.

So what's your Valentine plans???


I have little that Steve does not probably know by heart.  But a few comments
to Steve's point on siting new power plants.  I ASSUME "SENATE ENERGY
COMMITTEE" IS THE FEDERAL SENATE, NOT THE STATE SENATE.  I HAVE GEARED MY
SUGGESTIONS TO THINGS THE FEDS CAN OR SHOULD DO.:

THE PREAMBLE: The continuing lack of leadership by the Governor is causing
serious concern for anyone looking for a stable environment in which to make
the $billions in investments required for new power plants.  The desparate
search for blame placing (of exactly the guys that would make the
investment), the lawsuits, the simplistic, outright misrepresentations of
what happened and is happening, the threats of condemnation, etc. are doing a
good job of making the public very uneasy and effectively destroying the
"market" that resulted in the largest initiation of investment in power
plants in the state's history.  To the point, the debt lenders are getting
nervous; the equity providors are getting nervous.  (Duke:  "I would have
less third world risk developing a plant in Brazil...")  If the final result
of all of this is a public power agency that basically controls the grid and
the buying and selling of power, the cynic might observe that we will have
traded the accusations of greed of the present environment for a reversion to
the old environment of inefficiency and escalating rate bases.  In my
opinion, there is no way that the governor's present political initiatives
will result in the number of power plants that are necessary to cover the
demand.  He may be covering the near term price/supply issues with his CDWR
initiative (I note that it is winter time and power demand is down,
notwithstanding stage 3 alerts - wait until summer peak demands...), but
destroyed the desire of the long term risk takers to develop new plants in
this market.  If the politicians think the "state" can do the development, I
don't think so.  Think about it:  there just is not anyone in the IOUs or
CDWR or the Munis or any state agency that can make the decisions necessary
to make the investments required IN A TIMELY MANNER.    The public entities
do not even have the staffs to do the required work, much less the political
environment to get anything done, given the continued thirst for "doing
things right" vs "doing the right thing."  Maybe we will get back to long
term power purchase agreements for the development of new power plants.  I
point out that the Standard Offer contracts developed by the "State" and
entered into 15 - 20 YEARS AGO in a regulated environment by nearly 10,000 MW
of QFs are STILL OUT OF THE MONEY.  (Per SCE, since the PX began in 4/98,
only during August and December of last year were they in the money.  We
checked it out - they are right.  That is astounding.  And we want to go back
to that??)  Enron would be pleased to participate in long term PPAs,
especially since we are developing several sites, and can make money doing
that.  But if we want to be statesmen about this, we need must get a market
paradigm back.

THE SUGGESTIONS :

1. Federal Environmental issues:  There are 4 agencies in CA that get
involved in air issues:  US EPA, CEC, CARB, and the local AQMD.  Lot's of
rhetoric that each is just doing its own job, but the de facto result of that
many agencies looking at the inevitably overlapping issues is that the
requirements end up much tougher than they need to be.  Letting the state
deal with the last 3, and focusing on the US EPA because of where Steve will
be testifying, seems like the US EPA (probably through a change in law at the
Federal level) could do the following:

 a. Take a leadership position in rationalizing the rat warren of districts
and basins and ERC creation and transfer restrictions.  To our utter
amazement, every little district that we have gone into to develop power
plants have completely different rules and have required a completely
different approach re ERCs- SF Bay Area, South Coast, San Joaquin County,
Kern County, Placer, etc.  ERCs are the single biggest problem we have in
moving forward on the development of over 2000 MW of new plants we have on
the books.  I point out the ERC market in the east for SOX.  SOX ERCs
produced in Ohio can  be used in a new plant in Indiana.  This is not
technically crisp, but was a rational, political decision as part of the
Clean Air Act.  We need that same rationalization now in California.
Granted, CA and its politics was probably the genesis of the arbitrariness of
AQMD vs county boundaries vs basin boundaries, but if we can get the state to
the table to change this, the EPA will be involved.  Leadership by all is
necessary.  When 2.5 ppm new plants are being held up, the 100 ppm plants
will continue to be used to produce the power.  Do the math and tell me if
the pollution produced during the period of delay is worth the result.  Do it
again realizing that many of these 2.5 ppm plants will never be developed,
given the difficulty.

 b. Consider impact fees:  the concept of "pay to pollute."  In LA, there are
car pool requirements to reduce pollution.  If a company cannot or will not
carpool sufficiently, they can pay a fine that the district applies (I think)
to general programs, like electric water heaters vs gas, electric lawn mowers
vs gasoline, mass transit, etc.  Implement a similar program for power
plants. Work in concert with the local air district and the EPA to develop a
program that allows the developer to pay the market price for credits (FYI:
+$20 million for Pastoria) which the district uses to develop credits from
existing sources that have not yet been cleaned up  (see list 4 lines above,
and others.)  Necessity:  power plant proceeds while credits are being
develop.  If it takes 10 years to develop the credits, consider issues and
value of fact that the 2.5 ppm plant will eventually replace the 100 ppm
plants.

 c. Stop the crusade for ever lower BACT requirements that are based on vague
representations, inconclusive data and over zealous developer agreements.
Example:  Several years ago, Goalline Technologies developed SCONOX for NOX
reduction in a 25 MW unit in LA.  Good thing to do, but based primarily on
the results of that small unit and the salesmanship of Goalline's president,
we got ratcheted down on our 500 MW plant in Pittsburg to 2.5 ppm.  SCAQMD
calls to SCR vendors indicated "we can do that".  EPA jumped on board.
Guarantees from EPC contractors with LDs for nonperformance are different
than "we can do that" from an equipment supplier.  Now, EPA and others are
wanting 2 ppm, again based on vague data.  Sam even advises requests to
consider ~1 ppm.   (I point out that there are ZERO frame 7Fa units in
operation at these levels in California.)  GE has told us "absolutely not" to
a 2ppm guarantee.  However, I believe that requirements will in fact be
reduced again by EPA, just because they can.  Again, do the math on delaying
or stopping the development of, say, a 2.5 ppm plant (because EPA wants 2
ppm) in favor of the continued operation of a 100 ppm plant.  Hugely more
resultant pollution.

 d. Be open minded and proactive with developers' novel methods of creating
new sources of ERCs.  PG&E had a heck of a time creating ERCs for their Otay
Mesa 500 MW power plant in San Diego, ending up putting new engines in 4
harbor boats and +100 garbage trucks.  Enron has several similarly dificult
initiatives underway (Steve cannot tell anyone this, FYI only:  we are
looking at replacing engines in harbor boats in SF Bay, replacing engines in
"yard" locomotives in Sacramento and LA, replacing agricultural pumping
engines in the Central Valley, putting SCR technology in cement plants all
over CA.)  We could take years to get these programs approved as did PG&E, or
we can take several months, with EPAs (and others) leadership.

2. Federal Siting Issues:  California is at least attempting through
legislation to speed up the siting on new power plants.  Unfortunately, the
Federal agencies do not have the time line requirements to provide their
review on the speeded up schedules.  For example, a request of the Fish and
Wildlife Department for a review/permit gets put on the priority pile, first
come first serve:  shopping centers, housing developments, power plants,
power lines, etc.  I understand that our Pastoria project had 65 F&W
applications ahead of it when we applied.  And, there was no limitation on
how long they could take to get the review done.  I understand that one power
project has waited 2 years for its review.  The only way we got our permit
was Sam Wehn begged F&W to figure a way to get it done ahead of the 65 other
applications.  Fortunately, F&W figured that we could reapply under an EPA
rule in this specific case, which did have a timeline limitation.  We should
not have to rely on luck to get plants permitted.  Suggestion:  require the
federal agencies involved in power plant or transmission line permitting to
speed up their review/permitting times to be consistent with the state
initiatives to speed things up.

3. Market Issues:  I will not go into this in detail, as Steve is more able
than I to vocalize these issues.  However, from a power plant development
point of view, if we want the private sector to develop MERCHANT power
plants, and I believe we do because of the enormity of the investment
required, we must get back to a market structure.  As I am sure Steve
remembers, one of the big issues we all dealt with in "deregulation" was
stranded cost.  We can avoid those issues by getting the private sector to
make the investments.  Steve knows all the issues:  stability, liquidity,
credit worthy counterparties, lots of counterparties, etc.

	Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
	01/26/2001 10:24 AM

		 To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info

Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California.  Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information.  I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well.  Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!

Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California.  Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.

Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated.  Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were.  What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?

Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.

Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.

Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX.  Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean.  Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.

Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.

Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal.  Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.

Thanks for your help!


This is fine with me.  Should we send a BCC to Dave Cook and Howard Hawks.

Richard B Sanders
01/13/2000 03:11 PM
Sent by: Twanda Sweet
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Letter to John Pope

Attached is a new draft of the letter to John Pope with all comments
received.  Dick Ingersoll will send this out to TVA tomorrow.  If you have
any other additions, please get them to me today.


Attached is the spreadsheet requested that consolidates common findings in
London across commodities.  Let me know if you have any questions or comments.


Here's the document we discussed.? It is one of our  approved fact sheets.
?
If you have any trouble with the file, let me  know.
?
Ken
 - Constructive plan.doc


Joe, Jeff an Bob:
Here is a summary of those counterparties that have had specific objections
to our new form of Annex A:

1. Sithe Energy - wants New York law to apply

2. Voest-Alpine Intertrading USA, Inc. - won't agree to the setoff
language.   Credit should be consulted prior to any further trades to see if
they are okay with this given our relationships with this entity.

3. Madison Gas & Electric - will not agree to the "or otherwise" language in
the setoff language.  Again, this is a credit issue.

4. Cargill - wouldn't review the new language because we are close to getting
a master in place with them.  Sara expects this to happen in the next few
days.

5. Idacorp Energy Solutions, L.P. -  same as Cargill.  I am working on this
one and their attorney owes me a response.  This one may take a few weeks.

6. Formosa Plastics - this is the counterparty that sent the threatening
letter.  It didn't appear from our records that we have traded financial
derivatives with them recently.

7. General Electric Company - won't accept the chnages and have failed to
tell me specifically what they object to.  I will continue to follow up with
their attorney.

8. Basin Exploration, Inc. - same as General Electric.

9. TransMontaigne Product services Inc. - sent letter out on March 30 saying
they would respond in 30 days and I have never heard back from them.  I will
follow up with their attorney.

10. Reliant - they didn't accept the new language that we added as clause (z)
to Section 3(e) and wanted to deal with this differently in the confirmation
as a trigger that would give us the right to call for collateral.  Credit
should be alerted.

11. Devon Energy - they had in the past requested more time to review Annex A
and when I followed up with them last week, they still didn't have a response.

12. Smurfit - Stone Container - same as Devon energy.

13. Public Service Gas & Electric Company - we are close to finalizing an
ISDA with them.  If we do any trades with them before one is signed they have
requested chnages in few areas to match what we have agreed to in the iSDA
negotiations.  I can prepare a mark-up.


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 02:44
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           01/31/2001 03:42 PM

To: ragan.bond@bhlp.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: sandals

-

?????????????PAKISTAN HOLIDAY VACATION

?????A married couple were on holiday vacation in Pakistan. They were
?????touring around the marketplace looking
?????at the goods and such, when they passed this small sandal shop. From
?????inside they heard a gentleman with a Pakistani accent say,
?????You foreigners! Come in. Come indo my humble shop."

?????So the married couple walked in. The Pakistani man said to them, "I
?????have some special sandals I tink you would be interested in. Dey make
?????you wild at sex like a great desert camel."

?????While, the wife was really interested in buying the sandals after what
?????the man claimed, her husband felt he really didn't need them, being
?????the sex god that he was.

?????The husband asked the man, "How could sandals make you into a sex
?????freak?"

?????The Pakistani man replied, "Just try dem on, Saiheeb."

?????The husband, after much badgering from his wife, finally conceded to
?????try them on. As soon as he slipped them onto his feet, he got this
?????wild look in his eyes; something his wife hadn't seen in many years--
?????raw sexual power.

?????In the blink of an eye, the husband grabbed the Pakistani man, bent
?????him over a table and yanked down his
?????pants. He then ripped down his own pants and grabbed a firm hold of
?????the Pakistani.

?????The Pakistani then began screaming,
?????"YOU HAVE DEM ON DE WRONG FEET!"


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
04:27 PM ---------------------------

"The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>@ls.eei.org on
11/09/2000 02:51:56 PM
Please respond to "The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>
Sent by: bounce-app-ippexecs-33275@ls.eei.org
To: "Generation and Power Marketing Executives" <app-ippexecs@ls.eei.org>
cc:
Subject: Alliance Info Alert - FERC Reporting

Attached is a summary of recent FERC activities (PDF file) and the weekly
Alliance Express. The following is a summary of the most recent FERC meeting,
followed by a listing of the most recent FERC filings.

In a brief meeting yesterday, FERC approved a Final Rule adopting Section 203
merger filing requirements, generally as proposed, and extended the existing
NYISO bid cap in its non-spinning reserves market and the related mandatory
bidding requirement until such time that the New York market can be
determined to be "workably competitive."  At the same time, FERC ordered a
technical conference to explore changes to the NYISO reserves market, and
urged market participants to reach a consensus on a preferred solution, next
steps, and deadlines for resolution/implementation.  Additional details are
provided below.

FERC Updates, Streamlines Merger Filing Process

FERC unanimously approved its proposed Order revising the reporting
requirements for mergers.  However, Comm. Hebert did so with reservations, as
discussed below.  Commission staff stated that the Order closely follows the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking previously issued, but adds more detail and
more certainty to the industry.  Staff stated that the Order is improved over
the proposed rule because it includes exemptions from reporting for certain
entities and it more precisely defines geographical areas and products.

According to FERC, the draft Order:

-  revises the Commission's filing requirements to reflect existing merger
policy based on FERC's 1996 Merger Policy Guidelines;
-  provides more detail for the industry in developing competitive market
analyses.  The rule continues the existing screening process for mergers with
potential horizontal competitive concerns.  In addition, the rule establishes
informational requirements for vertical competitive analyses.
-  streamlines filing requirements for transactions that do not raise
competitive concerns; and
-  reduces the industry's regulatory burden by eliminating outdated filing
requirements.

The Rule will take effect 60 days after its publication in the Federal
Register.

Commissioner Reaction:

Comm. Hebert expressed reservations that, although he was voting for the
Rule, FERC should not be duplicating the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) market concentration analyses and that FERC
should follow the lead of anti-trust enforcement officials, who could also
analyze mergers faster and more confidentially. He also stated that FERC
should review the filings after the DOJ or the FTC review them, not before,
and that there should be a definite time frame for review.  Hebert did
mention that he was pleased that RTOs and the disposition of transmission
assets would be exempt, that ancillary services would be considered as a
separate product and that the Final Rule opens the door for alternative
market analysis.

Comm. Breathitt supported the Final Rule, stating that it should expedite the
approval process and that the regulatory burden should be eased due to the
fact that older, irrelevant requirements have been dropped.  She indicated
that the Final Rule balanced the need for speedy decisions while protecting
the public interest by stating that the process will be "efficient yet
sufficient".  The Commissioner said that she was pleased the Final Rule
addressed technical issues such as computer modeling as well as retail
competition and one of her main concerns, confidentiality.

Comm. Massey fully supported the Final Rule, emphasizing that it would
improve response time, lessen the need to ask for more data and allow the
industry to better predict Commission actions.  Like Commissioner Breathitt,
Massey was pleased that the Order will allow market modeling analysis that
will better enable FERC to evaluate market concentration and allow applicants
to point to other factors when concentration appears too high.  Massey also
stated that the new Rule includes the ability to address many of FERC's
concerns, such as future mergers when they occur in succession, retail
competition, mitigation by the enlargement of markets through RTOs and
analysis of ancillary services.  In sum, he averred that the Order will
provide FERC with the tools it needs for accurate analysis, while taking into
consideration the rapid changes in the industry.

Chairman Hoecker also voiced his support and noted that he felt that this was
a very important Rule.  In response to Comm. Hebert, Chairman Hoecker said
that the DOJ and FTC actually wait for FERC's report before issuing their
own, that the anti-trust enforcement agencies rely on FERC's expertise when
reviewing mergers in the electric and gas industries.  There is a major
positive connection between industry consolidation and RTOs and that both are
reconfiguring the markets and effect how they work, he noted.  Because the
RTOs enlarge the size of the subject market, he indicated, RTOs will help to
preserve competition.  Therefore, more and larger RTOs should allow for more
mergers, he said.  The Chairman cautioned that this is not to imply that
joining an RTO is a requirement for a merger, but that it would certainly be
viewed favorably.

NYISO Bid Caps Extended Until Ancillary Service Market Shown to be Workably
Competitive

In a 3-1 decision, with Comm. Hebert dissenting, FERC extended the existing
NYISO bid cap in its non-spinning reserves market and the related mandatory
bidding requirement until such time as that market can be determined to be
"workably competitive."  At the same time, FERC ordered a technical
conference to explore changes to the NYISO reserves market, and urged market
participants to reach a consensus on a preferred solution, next steps, and
deadlines for resolution/implementation.

In so doing, FERC rejected certain aspects of NYISO's September 1 and 8, 2000
compliance filing, submitted pursuant to its May 31, 2000 order imposing a
temporary bid cap through October 31.  The ISO's efforts to correct market
flaws identified in the order and further strengthen market performance had
not yet satisfied the Commission's directives, FERC concluded.  FERC found
that while NYISO has achieved solid progress in certain areas, overall the
ISO has not shown sufficient improvement to warrant raising and then
gradually lifting the temporary bid cap in the ISO's non-spinning reserve
market by April 2001, as the ISO requested.

Commissioner Reaction:

Comms. Hoecker, Massey and Breathitt all endorsed the order as an "imperfect
solution," yet a pragmatic approach toward resolving the flaws plaguing the
ISO's market.  Comm. Hebert faulted the Commission for squandering an
opportunity to incentivize additional supply by lifting the price controls.
Hoecker and Breathitt joined Hebert in expressing disappointment in the lack
of the ISO's progress, but contended that significant outstanding issues must
be resolved before the bid cap can be lifted.

In other action, FERC accepted NYISO's and NEPOOL's proposed Emergency Energy
Transaction Agreement, allowing NYISO and ISO-NE to provide emergency service
to each other (ER00-3638-000);

Stricken items included CAE-16 (NEPOOL's 64th Agreement Amendment proposing
the elimination of In Service and instituting new rules governing certain
import transactions (ER00-3577-000)).

                               == RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1) RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  ISO NE submitted its changes to Market Rule 17, Market Monitoring,
Reporting and Market Power Mitigation, in compliance with the Commission's
July 26, 2000 Order.  ER01-368-000.  Filed November 1, 2000.

*  ISO NE submitted its Special Interim Market Rule in compliance with the
Commission's July 26, 2000 Order.  ER00-369-000.  Filed November 1, 2000.

*  ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS filed to intervene regarding DYNEGY's
filing to request approval for the withdrawal of the ILLINOIS POWER CO. from
the MISO.  ER01-123-000.  Filed November 6, 2000.

*  EL SEGUNDO POWER filed a motion "requesting order on request for rehearing
by date certain" in complaint that challenges the CA ISO's ability to set the
rates for the energy that it can compel generators to produce for reliability
under its standard form contract.    ER00-1830-001.  Filed November 3, 2000.

*  CA ISO filed an unbundled grid management charge in order to recover its
administrative and operating costs.  ER01-313-000.  Comments due by November
22, 2000.

*  NEPOOL submitted supplemental information related to its filing of the
Sixty-Fourth Agreement amending the NEPOOL Agreement, which proposed the
elimination of In Service.  ER00-3577-000.  Comments due by November 14, 2000.

(2) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  DUKE ENERGY filed an amendment to its Catawba interconnection agreement
with NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP COOP.  ER01-282-000.  Comments due by
November 21, 2000.

*  DUKE ENERGY filed an amendment to its Catawba interconnection agreement
with the SALUDA RIVER ELECTRIC COOP.  ER01-281-000.  Comments due by November
21, 2000.

*  DUKE ENERGY filed an amendment to its Catawba interconnection agreement
with NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY No. 1.  ER01-280-000.  Comments
due by November 21, 2000.

*  ALLIANT ENERGY, on behalf of IES UTILITIES, INTERSTATE POWER and WISCONSIN
POWER AND LIGHT, filed new rates under its OATT to reflect the transfer of
certain transmission facilities to AMERICAN TRANSMISSION CO.  ER01-312-000.
Comments due by November 22, 2000.

*  WOLVERINE POWER SUPPLY COOP. filed to change its Rate Schedule FERC No. 4,
Wholesale Service to Member Distribution Coops, to make the debt
restructuring charge applicable to all energy delivered to its member coops,
to add standby service rates and to remove references to entities that no
longer exist.  ER01-285-000.  Comments due by November 21, 2000.

*  WOLVERINE POWER SUPPLY COOP. filed an amendment to its OATT to accommodate
Michigan retail choice and to add delivery scheduling and balancing service
as a new service for generators interconnected to its transmission system.
ER01-286-000.  Comments due by November 21, 2000.

*  POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER filed a revised Attachment H-9 to the PJM OATT
reducing the Other Supporting Facilities Charge for lower voltage deliveries
in the PEPCO zone of PJM to SOUTHERN MARYLAND ELECTRIC COOP.  ER01-336-000.
Comments due by November 22, 2000.

*  WOLF HILLS ENERGY filed a motion to intervene out of time to support the
Interconnection and Operation agreement between itself and AMERICAN ELECTRIC
POWER SERVICE CORP. and to deny the protest of TVA.  ER00-3688-000.  Filed
November 6, 2000.

(3) COMPLAINTS

*  AEP and SOUTHWEST POWER POOL each filed an answer to ENRON's motion for
summary disposition regarding ENRON's complaint, in response to AEP's updated
market analysis, that AEP SERVICE CORP. administered the AEP OASIS and tariff
in a manner favoring AEP's merchant function.  ER96-2495-015, et. al.  Filed
November 6, 2000.

*  POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER (PEPCO) and the SOUTHERN PARTIES filed a motion to
answer the protest of SOUTHERN MARYLAND ELECTRIC COOP and PANDA-BRANDYWINE
regarding PEPCO's divestiture of generation assets pursuant to restructuring
initiatives in Maryland and the District of Columbia.  EC00-141-000 and
ER00-3727-000.  Filed November 6, 2000.

*  DUNKIRK POWER, HUNTLEY POWER and OSWEGO POWER filed a motion to answer
protests filed by numerous entities regarding FERC's jurisdiction over
station power.  EL00-113-000.  Filed November 6, 2000.

*  ALLEGHENY ENERGY SUPPLY and PPL MONTOUR filed an answer to protests
regarding their purchase of certain jurisdictional facilities.  ER00-3727-000
and EC00-141-000.  Filed November 6, 2000.

(4) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

(5) MISCELLANEOUS

                                       ==OTHER NEWS==
*S&P Revises MISO Outlook to Negative
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/001107/ny_s_p_15.html
 - allianceexpress110700.doc
 - FF110300.pdf


hallo y'all.   it would seem from the feedback i have received from doug and
john that easter weekend would be far preferable to the 29th or the first
weekend in may.

well y'all i cannot commit just yet, so once again i will convey the
following:  if you absolutely cannot get to the pedernales on the two
lattermost aforementioned weekends, speak now or forever hold your peace.

will let y'all know asap.  but this here communication thing is mutual
endeavor and i would like to hear from everyone just to be sure.

rol
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


>FYI.  Please keep confidential.  John White's trying to go after the contracts.  Hap Boyd, who's on his Board, is opposing John's action and asking him not to go forward.  Too bad.  He was ready to launch.  Not sure what Hap's sensitivities are.  John's asked me not to intervene at this point.

Best,
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hap.Boyd@enron.com [mailto:Hap.Boyd@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Rachel McMahon
> Cc: Cavanagh, Ralph; steve_ponder@fpl.com; jweisgall@aol.com;
> joer@calpine.com
> Subject: Re: for Board review and comment
>
>
>
> John,
> As you know I do not favor attacking the DWR contracts. I don't want our
> company name associated with such an attack. The companies that
> negotiated
> the contracts did so in good faith at a time when prices were high and
> expected to continue so. We have defended contract sanctity in the past
> and
> should continue to do so. If copanies want to voluntarily renegotiate,
> that
> is up to them and DWR. I intend to stay out of it and would urge CEERT
> to
> do the same.
> Hap
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
> Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
> estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


See attachment for the latest California phone list:


Here are the DPL questions.  Don and I are going through these questions this
morning and talking with Ross  and Chris.  Thanks!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
09:14 AM ---------------------------

Dplflan@aol.com on 10/18/2000 06:18:51 PM
To: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

Ben-
This is a lengthy info/doc request - please give me feedback on how best we
can close the loop.

Thanks
Susan Flanagan

 - DocReq 001013b.doc


Kathleen,

Carlos has Illinois, so keep him copies please.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/26/2001 09:31 AM

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Greene Option and Memorandum of Options for all option
agreements.

Regarding Fehr:

Per your e-mail below, you indicated that Hillary Fehr called you and asked
what you needed from her.  I would think that we would definately need her
phone number and current address.  Regarding any legal documentation, I have
a call in to Karen Way requesting that she provide her input.

Kathleen

.

Rusty Stevens
03/23/2001 03:54 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Greene Option and Memorandum of Options for all option
agreements.

If I call to ask about dividing the check, she will undoubtedly say we have
to do it.  From a legal perspective there is normally something called a
Qualified Domestic Relations Order that we or other parties would require
before splitting proceeds.  Can you find out what document they will need to
produce to our satisfaction so that we don't breach the deal by splitting the
check.  I guess we could write out two checks and make them out to Hillary
AND Luke so they both have to cosign and can each deposit one check in their
respective accounts.

As to sending the option renewal check out with the Greene document, I think
that it would be better to send it along with the other $5000 check so they
get more money in one instance.  I think my suggested cover letter said
that.  How much longer before we send the deal out?

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/23/2001 01:12 PM

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, karen.way@piperrudnick.com

Subject: Re: Greene Option and Memorandum of Options for all option
agreements.

The Greene Amendment to Option and Amended Short Form of Option have been
approved by Carlos, but not yet forwarded to the Greenes or their attorney.
It was my understanding that you wanted to send the Option renewal premium at
the same time we sent the proposed agreements.  Is that still the case?

With regards to the Fehr Memorandum, it is true that Karen way did not
prepare a Memorandum for this Option, but I think I have a draft of one for
them.  We definately need to get this taken care of and have the Fehr's
execute it and get it recorded.  We need to send them an option payment by
April 2, so we can send the Memorandum at that time.  Can you please find out
if we should issue separate checks for the Fehrs?

Kathleen

Rusty Stevens
03/23/2001 12:53 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, karen.way@piperrudnick.com

Subject: Greene Option and Memorandum of Options for all option agreements.

I spoke to Mark Gershon at today and among other things we discussed, I
mentioned that we were working on the Greene option agreement extension.
What is the status of the extension ?

Secondly, I mentioned to Mark that I had heard from Hillary Fehr and she
indicated that she and Luke were no longer married.  She wanted to know what
we needed from her in that regard.  I told her to send us a brief letter
stating that, and to ask that we send her a copy of any notices (of exercise
of option or whatever) at her dad's address.  Apparently the plan is to have
Luke continue to reside in the house in the interim, but she said "for now".
I let her know that our option agreement precluded their selling the house
and that it would be to their disadvantage to give up the potential upside
anyway.

Mark pointed out that we need to make sure we have recorded Memorandum of
Option Agreements for all of our agreements - particularly this one - so they
dont try to sell anyway and have a lender do a title search and not find out
that the property was encumbered with our option agreement.  I understood
that we had not done memorandums for all of the parcels under option, and
would appreciate an update and plan of attack to get them in place.

Thanks


These things are usually a waste of time and money.

	"Rob Kean" <rob.kean@worldnet.att.net>
	01/13/2001 11:24 AM
	Please respond to rob.kean

		 To: "Steve & Melissa Kean \(E-mail\)" <skean@enron.com>, "Melissa Kean
\(E-mail\)" <kean@rice.edu>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Republican Senatorial Inner Circle

Have either of you ever heard of these guys?  I got a solicitation for a
contribution which includes a "membership" and the ability to buy entrance
to the inauguration of GW Bush.

Ever hear of them?

Rob


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"UNDREA HINES" <uhines@gardere.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22UNDREA+20HINES+22+20+3Cuhines+40gardere+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	dhill@bracepatt.com; gdial@bracepatt.com; Sweet, Twanda; RLanford@ielectric.com; hwatson@jenkens.com
Cc:	CINDY TAYLOR; DELMAR ROBERTS; KRIS WHITE; LISA SOUTHERLAND; MARISA SWEENEY; PARNEVA RICHARDSON; WINNIE HURSTON
Subject:	Fwd: FW: Lawyer Jokes

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:32:42 -0500
From: "DAVID IRVIN" <dirvin@gardere.com>
To: "DELMAR ROBERTS" <droberts@gardere.com>,	"UNDREA HINES" <uhines@gardere.com>,	"WINNIE HURSTON" <whurston@gardere.com>
Subject: Fwd: FW: Lawyer Jokes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_E7BDA318.B3D28FE0"

not bad!
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from gwsmtp.gardere.com ([206.50.30.82]) by gwmail.gardere.com; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:39:16 -0500
Received: from 216.7.131.248 by gwsmtp.gardere.com with ESMTP ( WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Thu, 26 Jul 01 12:34:21 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 716de230-6dbe-11d2-a840-009027115166
Received: by COPN03 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <LL54YKK3>; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:37:33 -0500
Message-ID: <818178D540E7D411BF7A00805F65678C2F27D7@COPN03>
From: "Swain, Sharon" <swain@copn.com>
To: "'sgriffin@velaw.com'" <sgriffin@velaw.com>,	"'pfalvella@gardere.com'" <pfalvella@gardere.com>,	"'pwiggins@gardere.com'" <pwiggins@gardere.com>,	"'dirvin@gardere.com'" <dirvin@gardere.com>,	"'smtakacs@aol.com'" <smtakacs@aol.com>
Subject: FW: Lawyer Jokes
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:37:31 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-WSS-ID: 177E8B17216574-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=windows-1252

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Martin [mailto:Carol.Martin@chamberlainlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:30 AM
To: anne_davis@administaff.com; Karen_Palmer@administaff.com;
lreiff713@aol.com; Debra Langard; Delores Cunningham; Deanna Geschke;
Linda Higginbotham; Jacilyn Pryce; Evans, Susan; Graham, Lita; Swain,
Sharon; moonrydermusic@earthlink.net; Theresa.Zucha@enron.com;
Barbara.A.Taylor@marshmc.com; asalazar@mdck.com; dbebell@mdck.com;
kjenkins@mdck.com; LSSMITH@mdck.com; Anne.Corbet@oceanenergy.com;
pkwild@onebox.com; rebecca.deluca@sylvania.com
Subject: Lawyer Jokes

Did you hear that the Post Office just recalled their latest stamps?
They had pictures of lawyers on them and people couldn't figure out which
side to spit on.

How can a pregnant woman tell that she's carrying a future lawyer?
She has an uncontrollable craving for baloney.

How does an attorney sleep?
First he lies on one side, then he lies on the other.

How many lawyer jokes are there? Only three.
The rest are true stories.

How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?
How many can you afford?

How many lawyers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
Three. One to climb the ladder. One to shake it.  And one to sue the ladder
company.

If a lawyer and an IRS agent were both drowning, and you could only save one
of them, would you go to lunch or read the paper?

What did the lawyer name his daughter?
Sue.

What do you call 25 skydiving lawyers?
Skeet.

What do you call a lawyer gone bad?
Senator.

What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 50?
Your Honor.

What do you throw to a drowning lawyer?
His partners.

What does a lawyer use for birth-control?
His personality.

What happens when you cross a pig with a lawyer?
Nothing. There are some things a pig just won't do.

What's the difference between a lawyer and a vulture?
The lawyer gets frequent flyer miles.

What do you get when you cross a bad politician with a crooked lawyer?
Chelsea Clinton.

This communication may be protected by the attorney/client privilege and may
contain confidential information intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed.  Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White,
Williams and Martin.  Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this e-mail without consent of the originator is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify Carol Martin by telephone at (713) 658-1818.

This e-mail and any attached files may be confidential and subject to
attorney/client privilege.  If you received it in error, please immediately
notify the sender by return e-mail or by calling (713)654-7600.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 05:26 AM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel
05/01/2001 12:24 PM
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: 2- SURVEY - PHILLIP ALLEN

-
Full Name:        Phillip Allen

Login ID:  	pallen

Extension:  3-7041

Office Location:  EB3210C

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Both

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada)  IPAQ

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  YES
    If yes, who?  INA RANGEL

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
    If yes, who?  NO

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
    If yes, who?  NO

Do you have access to a shared calendar?
    If yes, which shared calendar?  YES, West Calendar

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)?
    If yes, please list here:  NO

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  NONE

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:     7:00 AM To:      5:00 PM

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? NO
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):

<Embedded StdOleLink>


See attached letter

EB


I have been speaking with an ex-associate of yours from Valero and he asked
me to pass on his regards to you, Peter Groetzinger.  So, REGARDS from Peter!


Randy from operations side we wouldn't have a problem operating the system if
it can be worked out through legal. If it's decided that we will do this
there might be some additional equipment needed. We can get an operating cost
together if you would like.
Thanks
Rich

Jeffery Fawcett
11/27/2000 03:00 PM
To: Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Citizens request for proposal

Citizens Utilities is in the process of selling off all of its
non-telecommunications businesses throughout North America.  One of their
principal assets, Louisiana Gas Service (LGS) is one of those companies
recently sold by Citizens.  LGS provided gas control and operations services
to other non-LGS companies, including the Citizens Utilities LDC assets in
Arizona.  With the consummation of the sale of LGS, Citizens has told me
confidentially that they have no reasonable way of operating the
interconnect, metering and 1.5 mile lateral pipeline facilities that
interconnects TW and EPNG to the recently constructed Griffith Energy Power
Plant.   Therefore, Citizens is looking to possibly have a 3rd party provide
contract operations services under an operating agreement.  TW has been asked
in writing by Citizens to consider making a proposal to operate these
facilities.

Does TW have an interest in providing contract operations services for
Citizens?  In a related legal/regulatory question, does TW have the authority
to conduct contract services on behalf of others, or would we have to perform
these services as a separate legal entity?  If we do, does this present an
affiliate problem for us if we "share" operating employees?  If these
threshold questions can be accommodated, and TW is not only able to provide
contract operations services for Citizens, but has a commercial desire to do
so, what would we charge Citizens for this service?  Although it would appear
at first blush to be a relatively simple matter to operate these facilities,
remember that Citizens will be receiving gas (potentially) from both TW and
EPNG simultaneously, presenting not only a challenge to balance pressure
between the pipes, but to account for and reconcile deliveries and receipts
from both pipes as well as the plant site.

Although I'm the principal commercial representative for Citizens as regards
transportation matters, I'm certainly willing to step out of the middle of
this negotiation if Operations desires to handle it themselves.  I will be
happy to provide you a copy of the brief 1/2 page letter Citizens sent to me
on the 17th soliciting TW's interest.   Given the relatively short lead time
until LGS operations is sold, Citizens has requested expedited
consideration.  Please let me know how you want to proceed.  Call if you have
any questions.


Didn't see the release.  They gonna be a softwary provider, or something?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:16 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

They have been off the competitive landscape for some time now.  They are
completely changing their business model and kind of alluded to it in the
press release.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	cameron@perfect.com
Subject:

did you hear that commerce1 announced today that it's laying off 50% of
its people?  sounds very ugly.  but i guess that means less competition
for you.

best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Troy, can you call Jill Mearz with TIE and get the same contract information for Gerald. Please forward the information to Gerald as well. Jill (972) 455-2980

Gerald, we are bidding on gas for several IPP's with this company. They are wanting to get a copy of our contract ASAP to begin the initial review process. When Troy forwards you the contract information what would be the turn around for a hard copy and email I could send them.


FYI:

	Cell phone service will be terminated beginning tomorrow, 1/9/01.  If you have not yet made arrangements for new cell service and would like to do so, please let me 	know.

	Thanks,

	Kathy


Kim, can you call me upon receipt of this e-mail.. I require a confirm to be raised as part of a complicated three way transaction.

Barry Tycholiz - 713-853-1587.

BT


Oh shoot!  Yep, I will do that.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Cc:	Boyd, Samantha
Subject:	RE: Transcanada - Mirant assignment

I don't have any record or receiving any such assignment and I checked with the other paralegals and they don't have a record of receiving it.  Can you have Mirant resend it to Samantha Boyd, as she is the paralegal handling the paralegal assignment rotation right now.  Sorry about that!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Samantha
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Transcanada - Mirant assignment

Tana:

I did not receive documentation regarding this assignment nor has it been logged in by one of the other Paralegals.

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Boyd, Samantha
Subject:	FW: Transcanada - Mirant assignment

Who was this passed on to for handling?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Transcanada - Mirant assignment

Hi Tana,

A couple of weeks ago I sent up to you (I think it was you) the letter I
received regarding an assignment between Transcanada and Mirant.

Joyce Reed from Mirant is looking for an update on the status.  Can you
give her a ring when you have a free second (ha!) - 403 218 1031.

Thanks,
Diane

PS - Go Levittown!


Beverly Jones ext Beverly Jones ext


(See attached file: ng042502.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Dear Dave,

Attached please find the Cover Sheet, General Terms and Conditions and
Attachments for the above referenced Agreement.  Please don't hesitate to
call our attorney, Shari Stack at (713) 853-9477 or Kim Ward if you have any
questions.  I can be reached also at (713) 853-6389.

Regards,
Genia FitzGerald
Legal Specialist


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."