---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/09/99 10:08 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Santos
31/08/99 08:43 PM

To:   Rio de Janeiro Brazil - Office Staff, Salvador Brazil - Office Staff,
Cuiaba Brazil - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - Office Staff, Melaine
Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa
Wolfe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:  S?O PAULO PHONE LIST - AGAIN

DEAR COLLEAGUES,

SOME CHANGES WERE MADE AT OUR S?O PAULO PHONE LIST AT ARGENTINA OFFICE'S
SHEET.
IF YOU HAVE PRINTED THE LIST BEFORE (DATE 08/30/99), PLEASE, PRINT THE
ATTACHED ONE.

I'M SORRY AND
THANK YOU ALL !!!

(See attached file: PHONE_LIST.xls)            (See attached file:
ASSISTANTS.xls)

MARGARET SANTOS
Receptionist - S?o Paulo

 - PHONE_LIST.xls - ASSISTANTS.xls


worse for SCE and generators, who have to eat the small guy share of the
undercollection
between them. No transmission sale.

D

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> better or worse than ours?
>
>
>                     Dorothy
>                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     <drothrock@cm        cc:
>                     ta.net>              Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
Alternative Edison
>                                          Bailout Plan
>                     07/11/2001
>                     12:20 PM
>
>
>
> let me know if delaney doesn't send to you...
>
> d
>
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Thanks.  415.782.7854.  Better or worse than ours?
> >
> >
> >                     Dorothy
> >                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >                     <drothrock@cm        cc:     Ann.Cohn@sce.com,
> "'Barbara Barkovich
> >                     ta.net>              (E-mail)'"
> <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic
> >                                          DiMare (E-mail)"
> <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,
> >                     07/11/2001           "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
> <fieldejr@sce.com>,
> >                     11:54 AM             "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
> <isenberg@hmot.com>,
> >                                          "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
> <jdasovic@enron.com>,
> >                                          "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'"
> <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
> <lys@a-klaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
> <lysherif@yahoo.com>,
> >                                          "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'"
> <schoongl@sce.com>,
> >                                          "'John White (E-mail)'"
> <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
> >                                          dhunter@s-k-w.com,
> Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
> >                                          Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
> Alternative Edison
> >                                          Bailout Plan
> >
> >
> > I have the plan.....who wants it? send your fax number (and $10 for
> > shipping
> > and handling....just kidding)
> >
> > D
> >
> > Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Folks:  Please see highlighted sections.  Anyone seen Byron's plan?
> Know
> > > where it's headed, etc.?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> *************************************************************************
> > > Power purchase bills exceed $7.5 billion
> > >
> > > Published Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the San Jose Mercury News
> > > BY MARK GLADSTONE, NOAM LEVEY AND DION NISSENBAUM
> > >
> > > Mercury News Sacramento Bureau
> > >
> > > SACRAMENTO -- Six months after jumping into the electricity business,
> the
> > > Davis administration on Monday provided the first detailed glimpse of
> > > California's daily power purchases, showing more than $5 billion in
> > > payments, much of it to government-owned utilities and private
> companies
> > > that state officials have branded as price gougers.
> > >
> > > The state spent an additional $2.5 billion on a variety of contracts
> and
> > > other electricity services designed to stabilize the volatile energy
> > > markets, according to documents that the state agreed to release last
> > week
> > > amid a legal dispute over public access to the data.
> > >
> > > In roughly the first five months of the year, the state shelled out
> $1.2
> > > billion to Atlanta-based Mirant, the most any company was paid for
> > > electricity, followed by $1 billion to Powerex, the marketing arm of BC
> > > Hydro in British Columbia. It also paid $331 million to the Los Angeles
> > > Department of Water and Power.
> > >
> > > The documents raise questions about some of the common assumptions that
> > > have arisen around the electricity crisis. For instance, almost 40
> > percent
> > > of the state's purchases have come from government-run power generators
> > in
> > > California and elsewhere, but not Texas; some of the biggest suppliers
> > are
> > > from the Northwest.
> > >
> > > Gov. Gray Davis, who has ambitions to run for the White House, has put
> > much
> > > of the blame for the soaring costs of power on energy companies based
> in
> > > President Bush's home state.
> > >
> > > The figures are tucked inside 1,770 of pages of invoices that Davis has
> > > resisted divulging, saying disclosure would encourage suppliers to
> charge
> > > more. The state, which last month released information on its long-term
> > > electricity contracts worth $43 billion, agreed Thursday to release the
> > > first quarter details.
> > >
> > > Short on explanation
> > >
> > > The figures were disclosed late Monday by the California Department of
> > > Water Resources, which buys power for the state's financially strapped
> > > major utilities, and seem to buttress the administration's contention
> > that
> > > the price of power is gradually dropping but offer little or no
> > explanation
> > > for what prompted the decrease.
> > >
> > > In January, for instance, the average price for power on the spot
> market
> > > was $321 a megawatt hour. It peaked in April at $332 and dropped to
> $271
> > in
> > > May.
> > >
> > > One megawatt powers about 750 homes.
> > >
> > > Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the price data supports the
> > governor's
> > > assertions that California has been gouged. ``The bad guys are clearly
> > the
> > > out-of-state generators,'' Maviglio said. ``There has been a
> significant
> > > shift of money out of California.''
> > >
> > > But the documents fail to shed much light on whether, as the
> > administration
> > > contends, the price drop was due to long-term power contracts
> negotiated
> > by
> > > the state earlier this year. Critics contend that the Davis
> > administration
> > > panicked and rushed into deals that commit the state to pay high prices
> > for
> > > many years.
> > >
> > > Used for support
> > >
> > > Republican officials used the price information to bolster their
> attacks
> > > against Davis, a Democrat, for signing long-term contracts with power
> > > generators even as the price of power on the spot market was coming
> down,
> > > partly because of the declining price of natural gas used to fuel many
> > > plants.
> > >
> > > ``It's more clear than ever that the long-term contracts are a bad
> > deal,''
> > > said Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Camarillo. ``The governor's really
> > hurt
> > > the ratepayers for the next five or 10 years.''
> > >
> > > The newly released bills highlight the volatility of California's
> energy
> > > market, where the price per megawatt hour ranged from $70 to $1,000. On
> > any
> > > given day, the records show, the prices from seller to seller varied
> > > widely, with some of the highest prices being charged by public
> utilities
> > > and companies outside Texas.
> > >
> > > On one day in February, for example, San Diego-based Sempra Energy was
> > > charging $165 per megawatt hour, the Eugene Water and Electric Board
> was
> > > charging nearly $500 and Duke Energy, a North Carolina company, was
> > > charging up to $575.
> > >
> > > The state's daily spending peaked May 10 at $102.4 million for all
> power,
> > > including the spot market and contracted power.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January on behalf of the state's
> > major
> > > utilities, which were unable to borrow money to buy power after
> amassing
> > > enormous debts for electricity.
> > >
> > > San Jose-based Calpine Corp., which is building several new power
> plants
> > > around California including one in South San Jose, did only $29 million
> > > worth of business with the state in the first five months of the year,
> > > according to the figures.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January when Pacific Gas & Electric
> > Co.
> > > and Southern California Edison Co. were on the ropes financially. PG&E
> > > later went into bankruptcy.
> > >
> > > On Monday, state lawmakers took another shot at trying to cobble
> together
> > a
> > > plan to rescue financially ailing Edison.
> > >
> > > While most concede that a rescue plan Davis worked out with Edison will
> > not
> > > win the necessary support in the Legislature, lawmakers have created
> > > several working groups to come up with alternatives.
> > >
> > > Compromise plan
> > >
> > > On Monday, state Sen. Byron Sher, D-Redwood City, unveiled the latest
> > > compromise proposal that seeks to protect average ratepayers and small
> > > businesses from further rate increases and forces everyone else to help
> > > finance the Edison bailout.
> > >
> > > The ``shared pain'' proposal would force power producers, owed about $1
> > > billion, to take a 30 percent ``haircut'' and agree to forgive about
> $300
> > > million in Edison debts. Edison would be asked to swallow $1.2 billion
> --
> > > about a third of its debt. And big users would be asked to pay off the
> > > remaining $2 billion in debts, possibly by paying higher prices for
> > power.
> > >
> > > In exchange, large companies would be given the opportunity to buy
> power
> > on
> > > the open market, a system that would allow many of them to sign cheap
> > > energy deals.
> > >
> > > Sher presented the proposal to Senate Democrats Monday afternoon, but
> it
> > > remains unclear how much support the framework will receive in the
> > > Legislature.
> > >
> > > Contact Mark Gladstone at mgladstone@sjmercury.com or (916) 325-4314.


Mark Powell:

The changes seem appropriate to me; however, I will defer to Jeff Hodge, my
fellow Committe member, on giving the Commitee's approval to this set of
recommended changes due to his involvement in the Blue Range matter.

	Peter Keohane
	09/13/2000 07:31 PM

		 To: Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Proposed Amendments to the Physical Master re: Blue Range

Mark, I agree with your analysis, conclusions and amendments.  Well done.  I
trust the Legal Trading Committee will also agree, but I will be interested
by their response.

Peter.

	From:  Mark Powell\CAL\ECT                           09/13/2000 05:25 PM

Sent by: Mark Powell
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Proposed Amendments to the Physical Master re: Blue Range

Please see the attached memo and blacklined Master Firm Gas Purchase/Sale
Agreement.


Please find attached the management summary and Hot List for May 11, 2001.
You will be receiving these reports every Monday afternoon.

Thanks,
Misti Day


I am very pleased to announce that Inja Chun has been selected to head up the ENW EBS-IT Organization.  All parts of EBS-IT activities including Origination, Trading, Mid-to-Back office systems, etc. will report to Inja effective today.   Inja Chun is currently a Senior Director and has been with Enron since 1995.  She has been in charge of Mid-to-Back Office and HPL/LRC Pipeline Operations computer systems as well as other ENW systems.  Previously, she worked at Transco for 10 years and was in charge of the Transco Marketing Company's IT effort.  She has a Master's Degree in Computer Science from Kansas State University.

We would like to thank Sue Klinke for her work as acting leader during this interim period.  Sue will be pursuing another opportunity in the Net Works organization. Any additional changes in this group will be announced soon.


Stacey here is the Master draft  we discussed. I am sending you a version with comments.

dp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Dickson, Stacy E.; Nemec, Gerald; Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Enfolio Gas Purchase template

Could one of you please email me a copy of the standard template you use for Enfolio gas purchase agreements?  As we're getting more and more of those agreements, I'd like to add a template in Global Contracts.

Thanks!

Stacey Barclay Richardson
Enron Net Works, LLC - Global Contracts
Stacey.Richardson@enron.com
(713) 853-0569 Office
(713) 646-2495 Fax
(713) 710-6084 Pager


Jeff --

Look at the letter.  I see no issues.  Call me with your thoughts.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharp, Vicki
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Revised Letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 10/16/2001 01:37 PM ---------------------------

 	Enron Energy Services  From:  Vicki Sharp                           10/16/2001 01:38 PM Phone No: 713 853-7413

To:	Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Jim Steffes
cc:
Subject:	Revised Letter

please see the redlined letter below.  I am also forwarding to Jim Steffes for comments.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 10/16/2001 01:36 PM ---------------------------

 	Enron Energy Services  From:  Kathy Dodgen                           10/16/2001 09:49 AM Phone No: 713 853-6077   EB890

To:	vsharp@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Revised Letter

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Thanks.  My guess is that someone ought to go and represent TW.  Fawcett and
Harris ought to make that call.  Jeff D:  I assume you know who Lad Lorenz
is.  Either Jeff:  does Lad's involvement signal anything to us--i.e., is he
their "get stuff done guy" or their "try to look like you are getting stuff
done guy" ?  DF

From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/27/2001 07:51 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum

You get this?  Someone that I know forwarded it along to me.  Know anything
about it?

Best,
Jeff

 - Capacity Forum.doc


Please plan to attend a 1/2 day offsite on Thursday, May 24th beginning at
Noon.  Place to be announced later.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Bob/Bruce,  Will you please help Richard with this data request.

Richard,  Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I am out of the office.

JR

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sanders, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:54 AM
To: Rub, Jenny
Subject: Data Files Needed

I need to get the attached info to assist with the CA litigation. Who should
I call?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 07:52 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com> 05/11/2001 05:27 PM 	   To: "Richard
B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Data
Files Needed

Richard,
 Here are the specifics of what we need to get copied:

M:\NAHOUTRD\Houston\Power\Common\Electric\West\Incremnt\2000

We need all files copied from this directory.  These are the 2000 West Desk
Real Time spread sheets.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


I just figured this was a new way to test us.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jolly, Rich
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	Rice, Randy; Lowry, Phil; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Roensch, David; McCracken, Mike; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Keller, John R.; Maestas, Gary; Gallup, Team; Gallup-Sta5, Team; Gallup-Sta4, Team; Hendricks, Jonny; Greider, Jeff; Soldano, Louis; Ingalls, Todd; Shafer, John
Subject:	RE: Gallup Compressor

Thanks and yes it is suppposed to be September 6th which will be next Thursday. I must have dosed off during this time. Have a good weekend.
RJ

From:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/31/2001 07:18 AM CDT
To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	RE: Gallup Compressor

Rich,  You did mean September 4th instead of October I hope.  I know your doing this to see if anyone really reads your e:mails.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jolly, Rich
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:08 PM
To:	Rice, Randy; Lowry, Phil; Harris, Steven; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Watson, Kimberly; Roensch, David; McCracken, Mike; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Keller, John R.; Maestas, Gary; Gallup, Team; Gallup-Sta5, Team; Gallup-Sta4, Team; Hendricks, Jonny; Greider, Jeff; Keller, John R.; Shafer, John; Soldano, Louis
Subject:	Gallup Compressor

As you know the Gallup motor is being repaired by Industrial Repair Service in Farmington, NM. After a lot of discussion with Alstrom in the States and England they allowed us to have the motor repaired here instead of shipping back to England. This will save us approximately five weeks since it can be repaired in three weeks here versus seven to eight weeks in England. It will be out of the shop in Farmington on the 20th of September  and we'll be ready to install immediately.

The repair costs will be $150,000 and we ETS will be obligated to pay the difference in what Alstrom could have did it for. We'll also ask for whatever dollars it would have cost to send it to England and back.  Industrial Repair Service is doing the job for ETS so this means we will be held responsible for the repair cost and will have to recover our dollars from Alstrom. Arnold will work with Alstom on this after the unit is repaired. I'll assist in any way I can.

We'll still have two years warranty on the motor and Alstom will be responsible to ETS for this.

Thanks for everyone's help on this and we'll continue to have conference calls until we have the unit in service. In case you would like to join the call the next one will be October 4th at 07:30 MST. Call in number 1-877-795-3687   code 844699.

Below are pictures showing the damage. If I have missed anyone please pass the information on.

RJ

--------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 08/30/2001 08:35 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 	  From:  Todd Ingalls                           08/29/2001 11:48 AM

To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ken Crowl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Jeff Greider/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Gallup/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Gallup Failure Photos

Here are the pictures that I have so far.
---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Ingalls/ET&S/Enron on 10/29/2001 11:31 AM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
irsfnm <IRSFNM@compuserve.com>@compuserve.com> on 08/29/2001 11:29:45 AM
To:	Todd Ingalls <Todd_Ingalls@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	Photos

Todd:

Attached are photos of the failed coil and the deteriorated Mylar. Please
let me know if these photos don't make it.

Thank you,

Brett Gladden
Industrial Repair Service
505-327-6363
 - Mvc-011f.jpg << File: Mvc-011f.jpg >>
 - Mvc-006f.jpg << File: Mvc-006f.jpg >>
 - Mvc-004f.jpg << File: Mvc-004f.jpg >>
 - Mvc-003f.jpg << File: Mvc-003f.jpg >>


That's strange - I entered these deals for Matt yesterday, and specifically
typed 2 p.m. into the expiry date. Somehow it changed over, but I've changed
it back and re-saved it - so it should read 2 PM.

Thanks for catching that,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   05/01/2001 07:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: expiry time on 597006.01, 596993.01

Kate, can you please ask Matt about expiry time, the deal strip says 2:00 AM
it should be 2:00 PM on both.  thanks


Thursday @ 4:00

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

Mark Frevert@ENRON
09/08/2000 10:09 AM
Sent by: Nicki Daw@ENRON
To: Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashton
Soniat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Hebert/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie
Jewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Zaccour/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Miller/ECF/Enron@ENRON, ITH/ENRON@Gateway, Ed
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erik
Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared
Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES,
Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence
Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup
Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, l/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Bir/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Anthony Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael W Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Peter F
Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect,
Ronald Acevedo/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scot, t Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wayne
Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sales Practices and Anti-Manipulation Training

Sales Practices and Anti-Manipulation Training has been scheduled for
Thursday, September 14, 2000 and Friday, September 15, 2000.  Attendance at
this training is mandatory.  The sessions will run about 2 hours.  Since each
session can only accommodate 50 people, please call Taffy Milligan at (713)
345-7373 to reserve a seat.

 Session 1 Thursday, Sept. 14  2:00 p.m.
 Session 2 Thursday, Sept. 14  4:00 p.m.
 Session 3 Friday, Sept. 15  9:00 a.m.
 Session 4 Friday, Sept. 15  2:00 p.m.

Location details will be forwarded upon registration.

If you have any questions, please contact Mark Taylor at (713) 853-7459.

Mark Frevert / Mark Haedicke


INTEROFFICE MEMO

From: John Lavorato & Dave Delainey

To: All of ENA and EES

Re: ENA and EES Industrial SIC Codes

As Enron continues to build its origination and customer business in the US, it is becoming increasingly important that both ENA and EES target the appropriate industries and customers with our respective value propositions.  Double coverage and duplication waste resources and damages Enron's reputation in the market place.  It is also important that the right product, solution and sales technique are utilized to ensure the maximum benefit for our customers and Enron.

Consistent with the past, EES will be focused on those SIC codes or industries that are less energy intensive and are less sophisticated in their management of energy.  ENA shall continue to target and cover those industries and customers that are very energy intensive and employ significant process load.  We ask that both organizations respect the boundary.  In those few cases where this policy is not appropriate, please over communicate to ensure close coordination between ENA and EES before customer contact.

Effective immediately in the US and regardless of total energy consumption or number of sites, the following SIC codes have coverage responsibility in ENA.  All other industrial and commercial SIC codes and activity will be managed by EES.

ENA SIC Codes:

Primary Metals Mining and Extraction
Oil and Gas Extraction
Paper and Forest Products
Chemicals - except for pharmaceutical, biotech and small specialty chemical that will be EES customers
Refining
Petroleum and Coal Manufacturing
Plastics and Rubber Manufacturing
Fertilizer
Rail
Auto - restricted to the Big Three - Ford, GM and Daimler-Chrysler
Cement
Aerospace - restricted to Boeing, Raytheon, GE Aircraft, Allied Signal, Hamilton-Sundstrom
Large Agricultural Processing


Barbara Kurtz
121 Hilton
Lexington, IL 61753-1003
bekurtz@ilstu.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Barbara Kurtz


You probably haven't had time to look at the Duke Energy price.  When you get
a chance could you please let me know what the correct price is for May 2000
production.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
09/01/2000 07:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           08/30/2000 08:48 AM

To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pricing Issue for 5/00 production - Duke Energy

Elizabeth,
Sorry, I can't remember if we had talked about this pricing issue or what.
Were you looking into this issue  for me or was it passed to someone else.
Please see the email below.  I believe the system is pulling in the wrong
price for WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I.. for 5/00 production.  The deal # is 250237.
 I looked at the publication and it shows that the price should be $2.95.
The price of $2.95 plus $1 would equal the price of $2.96 which is what Duke
is
claiming the price to be instead of what we are showing which is $3.95.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000
08:42 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           08/28/2000 01:58 PM

To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pricing Issue for 7/00 production

Elizabeth,
I have a pricing discrepancy and I was not sure if I send this to you or
Oneil.
It's for Duke Energy, 5/00 production, deal # 250237.  Duke believes our
price is too high.  The system downloaded a price of  $3.95
The price should be WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I. , which is $2.95 for that month.  (
WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I. + 1 ) Duke believes we should have paid them $2.96.
I think the system pulled in the wrong price.  Could you please let me know
if you handle this pricing issue or someone else?

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
09:24 AM ---------------------------

Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/14/2000 11:00 AM
To: Anil Swani/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mac
McClelland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EBS business development in the Middle East

Rick:

I received a message from Mike McConnell yesterday about co-ordination in
the middle east. I think ur experiences with EBS relate to some people who
may have visited ur region before I took over. I do not think that u will
have a problem working with Anil. He understands the sensitivities and has
worked in the Middle East earlier for over 5 years. I have asked him to
co-ordinate with ur team. Pls help him get started.

Sanjay

	enron india

	From:  Anil Swani                           11/14/2000 12:41 AM

To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mac
McClelland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: EBS business development in the Middle East

Dear Rick,

You might remember me; we met in September when you visited Metgas in Mumbai
with the LNG team. At the time I presented a piece on the MetGas equity sale
and opportunities of cooperation with the Indian Oil Company.

Following Sanjay's new role in the organisation, he has now charged me with
developing the EBS business in the Middle East. In this regard I had a
telecon with Mac McClelland yesterday, the details of which are copied in the
mail below.

I would like to visit Dubai possibly next week to see the Dubai Internet
City, meet with senior officials at the Internet and Media cities to identify
what opportunities there could be for EBS.

We look forward to closely cooperating with you and your team in Dubai.

With best regards,   Anil
****************************************

	enron india

	From:  Anil Swani                           11/13/2000 12:40 PM

To: Mac McClelland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rory Bonafe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Conference call regarding Middle East EBS support

Mac,

You would be aware that Sanjay Bhatnagar has been given the responsibility of
managing EBS business in the Middle East and Asia and our team reports
directly to him. We are currently wanting to develop an EBS strategy for the
Middle East. For this objective Amr Ibrahim (Director, Regulatory) and myself
would like to plan a visit to Dubai in the near future (possibly early next
week). We would like to have a half hour conference call with you today to
discuss this visit. Based on your exposure and presence in Dubai, we would
like to seek advise from you on the below, which would be the objective of
our trip;

Dubai Internet City. We are well aware of this tremendous infrastructure that
has been developed in Dubai. Our information is based on what was available
on the web. We would like to see this facility, meet with the relevant people
in the Communications group and establish what business opportunities could
be available for EBS. From our understanding, the DIC infrastructure has
being developed by Siemens, Sun and Cisco. Fibre connectivity is provided by
a local telecom party.
Business potential. We would be developing a business plan for the Middle
East region and would like to identify what support we could get from Enron's
immendate presence in the region, in the way of direction.
Immediate business opportunity. What are the low hanging fruit for EBS in the
Middle East region and what are the first areas we should focus on that would
give us success, to quickly neutralize cost.
How do we get multiple entry visas for Dubai. Is it possible to get a one (or
three) month visa. Can we them for coming Sunday or would it be a rush? We
have Canadian and Danish passports.

I will call you at 12 noon (Dubai time) this morning.

With best regards,   Anil


Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Fran
503.464.7973


Hey, twice in one week!? News in Austin, fyi...

Here are thumbnail descriptions of the companies AV Labs seeded:

DForward: Developing software to help companies trade commodities the way
Enron Corp. handles energy, bandwidth and other commodities. "We like to
think of it as Enronizing -- that's a new verb for us -- some of the
commodities markets, things like paper, chemicals, steel, that kind of
stuff," Adams said.


FYI...

I faxed this today.

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


Several of you have inquired whether the recent memorandum to employees regarding cost savings opportunities is intended to affect the policies regarding the selection of outside counsel.  The answer is no.  Outside counsel and their fee arrangements will continue to be selected and negotiated only by the legal department, and I will continue to approve (or disapprove) each proposed counsel engagement that you recommend to me.  George Wasaff of GSS and I will work together to ascertain whether there are cost savings opportunities that should be applied to our outside legal counsel, but GSS will not be involved in the retention of outside counsel or in any negotiatons with outside counsel.  The goal is, as it has been, to be cost effective and intelligent in our selection and compensation of outside counsel. Please call me if you have any questions.  Jim


Looks like a real time guy put this deal in - along with three others - for
El Paso. Real Time isn't used to marking confirms on their deals, since
they're usually just trading hour-ahead. Let me know how you'd like these to
be changed (i.e. "yes-agreement" or "yes-counterparty to send confirm"), and
I'll do that right away.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
02/15/2001 07:24 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Public Service Company of N.Mexico #522906

This deal looks to me like it needs to be confirmed, but it was marked no
confirm.  Do you know of a reason why it shouldn't be confirmed?  If not, I
need a contact name so that i can send out a letter on it.
Thanks!
Kim


To clarify the memo that I sent yesterday concerning Buyer vs. Seller on
Intercompany deals, I want to make sure that everyone understands that not
only will the Seller side post on the SITARA deal but that the Volume
Feedback Reconciliation report  will reflect the error(s) associated with the
buy side as well.  It will no longer show the the error(s) generated by the
sales side as it currently does.  This change will coincide with the way SAP
reports Intercompany transactions.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Note: The Volume Feedback Reconciliation report is the report which I
distribute on a daily basis.

Thanks,
RHP

---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
10:20 AM ---------------------------

Regina Perkins
02/03/2000 05:32 PM
To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francis S
Lim/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Buyer vs. Seller on Intercompany Deals

It has been brought to my attention that SAP will not use the Buyer as the
governing value associated with Intercompany deals but the Seller.
Currently, SITARA captures the volume bridged back on the buy side not the
sales side.  I wanted to make sure that those of you who would be impacted by
the change were aware of how SITARA would reflected the volumes associated
with Intercompany deals.  If there are any concerns with this, please let me
know as soon as possible.  I will need to have an adjustment made to the
Volume Feedback Reconciliation report to reflect this change once it has been
finalized.   It may be a month or two before this is implemented but I wanted
to make sure everyone had advance notice.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at X39222.

Thanks,
RHP


Sounds cool, I have never met the guy, but hopefully he can help in DC
PL


Margaret,

I shall try to invite Hunter Shiveley who is in charge of Gas Market
Fundamentals.

Vince

Margaret Carson@ENRON
11/02/2000 09:57 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting TUES

Vince  Do you  plan on  inviting  anyone  from the power  issues side
--perhaps Ben Jacoby, Julie Gomez, Jean Mrha, Scott Neal  to  this meeting?
Thanks  Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/02/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John Goodpasture                           11/01/2000 05:53 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting

Margaret Carson is going to join us in the meeting next week with Nesbitt.
Vince will check with ENA to see if they also want to attend.  I would also
like to determine if ETS and/or NBP would want to send a representative(s),
although Margaret said she would take copious notes for distribution to other
key players as necessary.  We should ask Nesbitt how he would structure a
deal for multiple clients (eg. ETS, NBP, ENA, and maybe El Paso).

[We need to remain aware of any "affiliate" issues that may result, and make
certain that we are in complete compliance with the regs.]

I will wait until after our meeting with Nesbitt before deciding if/how to
approach El Paso.  Presumably, if asked to particpate, they would share the
cost and have independent access to any working model that is developed.

JNG

---------------------- Forwarded by John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron on 11/01/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/30/2000 04:42 PM
To: John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dale Nesbitt

John,

I talked to Dale Nesbitt. He suggested that the best way to evaluate his
model is to
go through a one week intensive project with assistance of somebody from his
company.
Our cost  is a flat fee of $12,500 that would be deducted from the purchase
price of $55,000,
in case we buy the software package.

The price of 55K is indicative and will be adjusted based on the required
level of support.

Dale will be in Houston next week. I have tentatively invited him to visit
with us on Tuesday,
November 7, at 3:00 p.m. He will adjust if you are busy at this time.

Please, let me know what you think.

Vince


I'm sure that many of you are aware that there has been a great deal of
activity lately related to Enron's evaluation of possible acquisitions.  John
Goodpasture's group has kept a large number of ET&S people engaged in looking
at a number of potential deals.  While these deal evaluation projects have
become routine around here, we all must remember that these projects are
extremely confidential.  Even after a potential seller has announced that it
is up for sale, the fact that Enron is looking at a potential deal, as well
as any of our internal analysis of the deal, remains strictly confidential.

I realize that many of you have ongoing business relationships with employees
of some of the companies that we have evaluated or may evaluate in the
future.  If you find yourself in such a situation, and a business contact at
the target company asks whether Enron is evaluating the contact's company or
assets, the only appropriate response is that Enron personnel are not
permitted to discuss potential acquisitions.  Please be aware that the
confidentiality agreements that we typically sign as part of the acquisition
evaluation process preclude any communication by Enron people with employees
of the target company.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this requirement, please do
not hesitate to give me a call.  Thank you for your assistance.  DF


Powecor and Aloca Australia  are approved

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 15-08-2000 01:38 CDT
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:

Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/11/00

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 01:38 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	08/11/2000 03:57 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/11/00

The EOL approvals for 08/11/00 are attached below.

Regards,
tm


you should have this. i sent it out yesterday.  the scapegoating continues....

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Probing the 'palace coup' -- or "eating their own"

-----Original Message-----
From: Tracey Bradley [mailto:tbradley@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Aryeh Fishman; Andrea Settanni; Dan Watkiss; Jacqueline Java;
Kimberly Curry; Ronald Carroll
Subject: Probing the 'palace coup'

FYI

Probing the 'palace coup'
Electricity: A panel focuses on price hikes and the actions of the ISO president.

September 26, 2001

By KIMBERLY KINDY
The Orange County Register

SACRAMENTOA state Senate committee is set today to start serving 16 subpoenas on electricity producers and officials who manage California's energy grid to determine whether they acted in concert to manipulate energy prices.
T
 he investigative committee, headed by state Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, is focusing on a series of events last fall filled with enough Shakespearean plot twists and intrigue that it has earned a name around the Capitol: "the palace coup."

Lawmakers and consumer groups allege that the events - directed by the man who heads the state's energy grid - fueled the California energy crisis, pushed the state into the power-buying business and helped make billions of dollars for power producers.

The central question behind the palace coup is whether Terry Winter, the president of the Independent System Operator, acted alone when he took steps to remove key price caps designed to limit the amount power generators could charge.

Winter defied his own board and Gov. Gray Davis when he filed a 50-page request to remove the caps, records and interviews show.

"I don't know how these events could have taken place without some concerted effort," said Dunn.

The subpoenas will force those involved, including Winter, to provide sworn testimony about the events to the committee, and to turn over e-mails, personal calendars and memos.

Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the governor felt "betrayed" by the actions of Winter.

"The governor believes it was the defining moment, when what was a mounting problem turned into an instant crisis," Maviglio said.

Winter refused comment, referring all questions to the public relations office. ISO spokesman Gregg Fishman said Dunn's committee will find no criminal conduct. The decision was made by ISO upper management with one goal in mind: to keep the lights on. At the time, generators were refusing to sell power in California because of the price caps.

"It was an emergency," Fishman said.

"We had to take action.''

What became known as the palace coup began on Oct. 26 when ISO board members voted for severe restrictions on the amount of money electricity producers could charge for power. The restrictions would drive prices as low as $65 per megawatt - nearly 12 times below the $750 per megawatt limits of seven months earlier.

"They (electricity generators) grinned and beared the $750 price cap, but this new plan by ISO was too much," said Dunn, whose committee has been investigating since March.

"All hell broke loose.''

Records show that on Oct. 31, power generators and electricity traders filed letters with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, demanding that the new plan be killed. The letters, six in all, were sent within two hours of each other and represented dozens of power generators.

"If not removed immediately, the (ISO) price cap will sow confusion in the market, threaten reliability and stifle new investment in generating capacity,'' read one letter written by Duke Energy Vice President William Hall III.

Although there is nothing illegal about the generators acting together to lobby against price caps, Dunn believes the letters and other actions around the same time showed clear coordination among energy officials. He said the main aim of the subpoenas will be to determine whether collusion occurred to "fix" prices, which would violate federal trade laws.

In the Oct. 31 letters, electricity producers told federal officials that if price caps weren't removed it would lead to a collapse of the energy market.

The generators got their way.

The next day, the federal commission killed the new pricing plan. What was left in place was a $250 price cap established five months earlier.

Power producers then turned their attention toward killing that cap, saying they couldn't make a profit even under these constraints.

They began to withhold power from California, and on Dec. 7 the ISO declared its first Stage 3 emergency and braced for blackouts, which were narrowly averted.

What followed the next day is considered by the governor and Dunn to be the pivotal moment of the energy crisis.

Winter, who in his position as president and chief operating officer of the ISO, submitted a 50-page emergency request, asking federal officials to abolish the $250 price cap. Final authority over lifting the cap rested with the federal government.

Neither the ISO board, which had established the price cap, nor the governor learned of Winter's actions until the cap had been removed. In fact, the attorney who helped draft the emergency request, Charles Robinson, was in a meeting with representatives of the governor and ISO board members just hours before the filing was made. He didn't mention anything about it.

"In retrospect, we should have told them,'' Robinson said.

With the price caps gone, the generators filed paperwork with federal regulators justifying higher costs.

"The ISO staff sat in a meeting with the governor's key energy advisers with poker faces, not saying a word about something that was going on at the exact same moment,'' Maviglio said. "It was beyond belief that they failed to mention something so significant. This action accelerated the utilities' move toward bankruptcy and forced the governor to move the state into the power-buying business."

Prices for electricity jumped from an average of $249 a megawatt to $700 a megawatt within three days, ISO records show.

Dunn believes the resulting overcharges for electricity exceeded $30 billion.

Robinson said the filing - granted two hours after the request - helped rather than hurt Californians. Prices, he said, did not spike as a result. Instead they followed the skyrocketing price of natural gas - which is used to run power plants to generate electricity.

Robinson said the emergency order allowed the ISO to secure refunds should overcharges for electricity be proven to federal officials.

"We believe the action we took addressed a severe concern,'' Robinson said. "In our view, we did not believe we changed or made worse the financial situation. We felt we made it better because it introduced a process for review and refund."

Jan Smutney-Jones, who was the ISO board chairman at the time and executive director of a group that represents power generators, said Winter did not consult him about eliminating the price cap. Smutney-Jones also said he was unaware of anyone in the power-generating community being consulted.

"Terry did this by himself,'' said Smutney-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers.

"He did what he thought had to be done at the time to keep the power flowing."

The ISO board called an emergency meeting the next week demanding Winter explain his actions. Some board members pushed to have Winter removed, but there were concerns such action would lead to more chaos, the governor's spokesman Maviglio said.

James J. Hoecker, the former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chairman, defended making the December decision and also defended Winter.

"They filed an emergency motion, and we were not about to let California go dark,'' Hoecker said.

"They (ISO management) did what any independent system operator would do."

What Dunn's committee hopes to learn is why all these events transpired. He believes memos and e-mails around the time of Winter's Dec. 8 actions should provide vital clues.

"We don't know why he did what he did, but we are eager to find out," Dunn said. "Terry said he made that filing in the interest of Californians, but I find that argument has no basis in fact.''


Rich
Thanks for the information.
Please contact RUPP AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY,INC.
                       740 E Highland Ave #100
                       Phoenix, AZ 85014
                       (602) 277-0439   Fax (602)277-0460
                        www.ruppaerialphoto.com <http://www.ruppaerialphoto.com>
This company produces very detailed aerial coverage used by the city and developers in Phoeniz and Arizona. We cuurently have the city of Phoenix mapping
Since they are local, they may have, or be able to produce good areail coverage for our proposed routes for Sun Devil.
Thanks, and let me know how your inital contacts go.

-----Original Message-----
From: Plachy, Rich
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Martin, Jerry D.; Spalding, Norm; Alexander, James C.
Cc: Cebryk, Doug; Lohmann, Jon M.; Brantz, Gene L.
Subject: FW: GITA GIS for Oil and Gas meeting

This company is pushing digital and space imagery for pipeline aerial photography.  May be worth investigating as this is likely where we are headed in the near future and in fact, may be a more 'efficient' product now for some projects.

Based on the moving of technology toward digitally interfaced mapping, if we have knowledgeable people available, this might be a good investment.
For Phase VI aerial photography, we checked this out and found:
    The turn around time for aerial digital photography was much, much better than for film photography.
    Costs seem to be lower although not of significant magnitude.
    Overlay onto drawing system files would be much easier & faster especially if system is laid out in this format - which I understand Enron is headed towards.
    Shortcoming was the fine detail or ROW objects - telephone pole shadows, etc. that show up on film but not on current digital technology.

For Phase VI, we wound up sticking with film to be sure we got what we needed.  We did not have time to do it twice and there was risk plus it seemed sure we would eventually have to do the film later for the detail.
These shortcomings will probably go away in the next generation of digital cameras.  In addition, in a short FERC filing deadline, these details do not appear necessary for FERC, only for later detail engineering design.  I do not know time constraints if any, but Doug might consider for Sun Devil.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Gottfried [mailto:petergottfried@gis1.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Lowry, Phil
Cc: Plachy, Rich; Perkins, Rick; Larry Abbott; Frank Osburn; Crump, Michael
Subject: GITA GIS for Oil and Gas meeting

Phil:

Thank you very much for taking the time out of your schedule to meet with me and my colleagues concerning mapping, information technology, and imagery.  I am getting in contact with Mike Crump to discuss the logistics of a demonstration project for the Minnesota area.

As I mentioned to you, we will be at the GITA GIS for Oil and Gas Conference demonstrating our "e-maps" internet delivery solution.  Conference dates are September 17, 18 and 19th at the JW Marriott Hotel by the Galleria (713) 961-1500.  We would like to meet as many Enron folks as possible at this meeting, so it you would be kind enough to circulate this email to the appropriate individuals.  They may call me at 407-718-3880 for trade show times or arrange for a hands on demonstration.

Thank you again for your time and I look forward to working with you in the future.

Peter K. Gottfried, M.S., M.B.A.
Natural Systems Analysts, Inc.
P.O. Box 1598
Winter Park, Florida   32790
407-644-6650
petergottfried@gis1.com <mailto:petergottfried@gis1.com>
www.gis1.com <http://www.gis1.com>


Pls get me in on the meetings with Galasinsi and Mcchane. df

Keith Petersen
12/20/2000 07:48 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

Apparently, someone has told Stan that they can make some changes to the
horsepower and some of the piping and increase thruput by 30 to 50 MMcf/d.
Steve Harris told Drew that the theory had not been proven as of yet.  Steve
was surprised with the announcement.  I'm told that Stan believes that
operationaly we can be ready by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
Apparently Stan has talked with someone at FERC about expidited treatment (I
do not have confirmation on this. It is all hear say.).  Terry Galasinni and
I have a meeting tomorrow (12/21/00 in the PM) to discuss what is happening
and how we are to get the information quicker.

Donna is continuing to work on the 10 MMcf/d expansion.  Once we know exactly
what is happening we will modify our filing to match.

An update on the possibility of moving 20 MMcf/d off the San Juan Lateral and
the cleaning of the lateral.  I have talked with planning and they have
confirmed that if we only flow 850 MMcf/d on the lateral and by cleaning the
line they can increase the suction to the Gallup compressor to 775 psig, the
existing equipment will work to gain the incremental 10 MMcf/d from east of
Thoreau to the California border.  We are going to meet with Bob McChane
today to discuss.

Keith

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           12/20/2000 07:26 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

What changes is Stan talking about?  I saw the article where he talks about a
30-50/per day project-  where did that come from??   MK

Stanley Horton
12/19/2000 06:15 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S@Enron ., Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

Lets make sure we are picking-up on the other ideas Phil has for getting
additional capacity on Tw.  If any of his ideas require regulatory approval
we will probably want to include in the same certificate application.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
08:19 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
01/26/2001 07:59 AM
To: bobb.supertravel@wspan.com, audrau@yahoo.com, Memaw1995@aol.com,
Kathy.Crenshaw@inteq.com @ Enron, Kayla Crenshaw/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, jimmywgordon@hotmail.com,
IMYoars@aol.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, kip.wia@alpha1.net,
emlea@usa.net, youens@cyrunner.net, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Thibaut/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Laura Valencia/Corp/Enron@Enron, hmel5345@aol.com
cc:
Subject: What shall we tell our children.

This is good!

 Vice  Presidential  candidate  Sen. Joseph Lieberman recently
 asked  the question, "What will we tell our children if every
 vote is not counted?"

 Here is the response of one citizen:

 "As  a  former  teacher,  I  have  been  concerned  about Joe
 Lieberman's  question,  "What  will  we  tell  our children?"
 What  we  should, and must, tell our children is that if they
 fail  to  mark the right answer on an exam, or do not fill in
 the  entire test, they will not get credit for their answers.
 If they do it often enough and if they do not ask for help or
 read the directions properly, they will fail.

 We  should  tell  them  that  when they are older and move to
 Florida,  they  must  fully read their ballot and remove the
 entire chad and not keep an entire nation waiting because of
 their mistakes.

 We  must also tell them to read and read well, to play by the
 rules and expect a favorable outcome.

 Teaching them to make excuses for their mistakes has led to a
 society of victims unable to take responsibility.

Amen and Amen!


Mr. Hyvl,

Happy New Year!  Hope you enjoyed the holidays.  Did you have a chance to
see if we could raise the threshold of $10 million for a Letter of Credit?
(see message below)

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W.
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 1:58 PM
To: 'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'
Subject: RE: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

I agree.  The Accounting Dept. informed me that there are two days that
sometimes land on the 25th that CPS considers a holiday.  One is the day
after Thanksgiving and the other is during Fiesta for the Battle of Flowers
Parade.  I requested that they just pay a day early if the 25th lands on one
of these CPS holidays.

I have one more request, however.  In 4.5. Collateral
Requirement/Termination Payment Threshold, could you raise the threshold of
$10 million for a Letter of Credit to $15 or $20 million (whatever you feel
comforable with)?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:57 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Cc: Janet.H.Wallis@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Christian,
     I believe this is covered because the language states that if the 25th
is not a
Business Day, the payment will be due the next Business Day.  Business Day
is a defined term as a day when the Federal Reserve Banks is New York are
open for business.  I cannot agree to a Customer's Business Day because it
is not a defined term and may differ from the standard definition of
Business Day.  Therefore that change should not be incorporated.  Do you
agree?

                    "Pfister,

                    Christian W."         To:     "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"

                    <CWPfister@cps        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                    -satx.com>            cc:

                                          Subject:     FW: FW: Enfolio
Contract with CPS
                    12/15/2000

                    05:48 PM

Mr. Hyvl,

There was one change that you did not make that I requested.  It was
difficult to tell since only a single word was bolded.

APPENDIX "1"  FINANCIAL MATTERS  BILLING, INVOICE DATE, CHARGES AND PAYMENT

"Buyer shall remit any amounts due on the 25th day of the Month in which
Seller's statement was received.  If the due date for any payment to be
made
under this Agreement is not a Customer's Business Day, the due date for
such
payment shall be the following Customer's Business Day."

There are very few instances where our Business Day would be different from
your business day.  However, as an example, the day after Thanksgiving is a
CPS holiday.  This year, we had a gas payment due on that date which we
sent
on the following Monday.  This is probably the only holiday CPS has that
your company may not have.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:57 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Christian,
     Attached is the modified contract with the changes you requested.
Please print off 2 originals and have them signed.  Please fill in the
purchase order number information on the invoices section of Exhibit A.  If
the number is not available, them please delete the information requiring
the number from the billing and payment provision.  Forward the signed
copies to me or Janet Wallis and we will proceed with execution by ENA.
(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)

                    "Pfister,

                    Christian W."         To:     "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"

                    <CWPfister@cps        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                    -satx.com>            cc:

                                          Subject:     RE: FW: Enfolio
Contract with CPS
                    12/15/2000

                    04:16 PM

Unfortunately, we don't have a purchase order issued yet so I can't give
you
a number.  I know that would make it easier for you guys, but I don't think
we can issue one until right before the first gas purchase.  First, a
purchase requisition needs to be issued.  Then, a purchase order will be
released following approvals by the various individuals authorized to sign
off on them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:13 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Cc: Janet.H.Wallis@enron.com
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Christian,
     If the purchase order number will be the same for all deals under the
contract, can you give me the number so that I can include it as a part of
your address for Invoices.

(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)


Ken Lay spoke with several California CEOs this morning and urged them to get
personally involved in pushing for a comprehensive set of reforms.  Three
expressed willingness to help.

Scott McNealy (Sun):  contact person - Piper Cole (piper.cole@sun.com);
scott.mcnealy@engeng.sun.com.  Mcnealy wants, by close of business today, a
"cheat sheet" of the talking points to use with politicians (the "8 or 10
elements of the solution") with the expected comeback he may hear from the
political leaders and our response to that comeback.  He says he hasn't spent
time working on issues in Sacremento so we may also want to include a list of
suggested contacts.
Kevin Sharer (Amgen): contact person - Sarah Jensen, VP of Engineering and
Operations (805.447.6785); ksharer@amgen.com.  Sharer wants the same
information as McNealy and he and McNealy both indicated their willingness to
call a meeting of other California CEOs.  Sharer will also be having
breakfast with Hertzberg one week from today.
Robert Day (Trust Co of the West):  said that he is very close to the mayor
of Los Angeles.  He urged Ken to call the mayor (mentioning Day).  Ken would
like some talking points for that call.

Jeff - please put these items together.


Our department will be migrated to Outlook in two groups.  The first group
will be migrated on Monday, June 11,  and the second group will be migrated
on Tuesday, June 12.   You will receive four e-mails from the Outlook
migration team.  Please do not delete them.  You will need to open the four
e-mails and follow the instructions to migrate to Outlook.

Assistants, you will be responsible for scheduling training for yourself and
your assignments.  It is recommended everyone attend a one hour training
class.  Training can be scheduled by contacting Maggie Cruz at extension
3-1816.  (Assistants, please coordinate training with your backup so both of
you are not in training at the same time.)  Outlook migration specialists
will be on the 38th floor to answer questions Tuesday and Wednesday, June 12
and 13.

Listed below is useful information provided to us by the Outlook Migration
team.

E-mail Policies

Users will be restricted to a Mailbox size of 100 MB.

Further mailbox size restrictions are detailed as follows:

Issue Warning at 75 MB - users are automatically sent a warning from the
System Administrator explaining they are near their Mailbox limit.

Prohibit Send at 100 MB - users are prevented from sending e-mail, yet they
can still receive internal and external messages.  Users must reduce the size
of their mailbox by deleting old mail, saving attachments to a local drive,
etc. before they can send e-mail again.

Inbound/Outbound Mail Size Limits - inbound and outbound e-mail messages will
be limited to a size of 10MB.

Deleted Item Retention - users will be able to recover deleted items from
their mailbox as old as 8 days.  Deleted items include e-mail messages,
folders, contacts, calendar entries, tasks, notes, journal entries and
meeting notices.

Archiving - archiving will not be a supported feature of Outlook 2000.

Migration Preparation

Clean Your Mailbox - due to new space limitations on your mailbox, you are
advised to clean your Notes mailbox of old, unneeded messages BEFORE
migration.  If you are at the 100MB limit on the day of migration, you will
not be able to send messages once you are in Outlook.

Limits on Items Migrated  - from the day of your migration, only 30 days of
old mail will be migrated from your mailbox.  This includes mail in your
inbox and other folders.  Calendar items dating back one year from the day of
migration will be migrated (with the exception of repeating appointments).

The following people will be migrated Monday evening, June 11.

Adams, Suzanne
Bushman, Teresa
Cash, Michelle
Clark, Bart
Corbet, Nancy
Daniels, Eddy
Davis, Angela
Dickson, Stacy
Edison, Andy
Elbertson, Janette
FitzGerald, Genia
Flores, Nony
George, Robert H.
Goode, Diane
Guinn, Linda
Haedicke, Mark
Hansen, Leslie
Hearn, Ed
Heinitz, Mary
Hodge, Jeff
Legal Temp 1
Legal Temp 2
Legal Temp 3
Legal Temp 4
Mann, Kay
Maxwell, Matt
McCullough, Travis
Meraz, Claudia
Mellencamp, Lisa
Milligan, Taffy
Moore, Janet H.
Nemec, Gerald
Nettelton, Marcus
Ogden, Mary
Perlingiere, Debra
Portz, David
Sager, Elizabeth
Sanders, Richard
Simmons, Linda
Sol,, Carlos
St. Clair, Carol
Sweet, Twanda
Tweed, Sheila
Van Hooser, Steve
White, Ann Elizabeth
Zucha, Theresa

The following people will be migrated Tuesday evening, June 12.

Aronowitz, Alan
Bailey, Susan
Boyd, Samantha
Braddy, Martha
Bruce, Robert
Bruck, Sarah
Carolan, Dominic
Castillo, Connie
Collins, Harry
Cook, Mary
Crady, Ned
del Vecchio, Peter
Doucette, Margaret
Farrell, Keegan
Ferguson, Samantha
Garcia, Nita
George, Carolyn
Gray, Barbara
Greenberg, Mark
Gresham, Wayne
Haas, Merrill
Heard, Marie
Hendry, Brent
Jones, Tana
Keiser, Holly
Koehler, Anne
Korkmas, Deb
Lauterbach, Elizabeth
Legal Temp 5
Legal Temp 6
Legal Temp 7
Lindeman, Cheryl
Lovelady, Steven
Lyons, Dan
Martinez, Mary Helen
Mayer, Laurie
Murray, Julia Heintz
Nachawati, Majed
Nelson,  Cheryl
Panus, Stephanie
Pinto Leite, Francisco
Rivera, Coralina
Robison, Michael
Rogers, Daniel
Sayre, Frank
Shackleton, Sara
Shanks, Reginald
Spencer, Becky
Stoler, Lou
Taylor, Mark
Viverito, John
Young, Randy

Many thanks for your help in making this a smooth migration to Outlook.

Nony Flores and Janette Elbertson


"You cannot be dependent upon your eyes when your imagination is out of
focus.8 - Mark Twain

Watch the Enron Building lobby on Wednesday, April 25th, from 11:30am to
1:00pm for information on some of
Enron's new innovative businesses.  You'll have the opportunity to meet
various business representatives and discuss
their products and services from the creative minds of our employees.  Watch
for Vince Kaminski
who will be present during this exciting exchange of information.

Featuring:
Deal Bench, enron.credit.com, Weather Risk Management, Enron Trading Game and
Xcelerator

Word of the Day
cerebration \ser-uh-BRAY-shun\, noun:
The act or product of thinking; the use of the power of reason; mental
activity; thought.


Sean Maloney has sent you an Evite Invite!

To view your Invite, simply click the following Web address:
http://www.evite.com/r?iid=FAPMEKTHNQKSBVWELTMU

This Evite Invite is covered by Evite's privacy policy*.
To view this privacy policy, click here:
http://www.evite.com/privacy

********************************
Workin' for the weekend? - With only two days to call your
own, you've got to make them count. The Citysearch Weekend Guide makes
workin' for the weekend worth it.
http://weekend.citysearch.com?cslink=nsltr-evite-invite

Need some help?  See below!
*********************************

Perhaps your E-mail program doesn't recognize the Web address as an active
link.  No problem!  You can copy and paste the Web address into your Web
browser.

Here are instructions on how to copy and paste:
a. With your mouse, highlight the *entire* Web address above
b. Select the EDIT menu and choose COPY
c. Go to your Web browser and *click inside* the window where
you normally type a Web address to visit
d. Select the EDIT menu and choose PASTE
e. Now hit ENTER on your keyboard to take you to the Web address

It's that easy! :-)

If you would like further assistance, we're happy to help - please send
E-mail to support@evite.citysearch.com

* Updated 01/09/01.


Northeast RTO Mediation Report

The Commissioners heard a report from the ALJ who presided over the Northeast RTO mediation.  As you may recall, the Judge did not support our position (which was to get a single Northeast RTO up and running, with PJM leadership and based on the PJM system) by no later than November 2003 (the PJM proposal).  As expected, the Judge reiterated his disagreement with the PJM proposal and urged the Commission to take a "go slower" approach that includes a minimum 12 month up-front assessment of technology and "best practices" determinations.

Pat Wood first questioned why the Board makeup should consist of existing ISO board members.  He acknowledged that the existing ISO board members have experience but questioned whether the benefit of having their experience is outweighed by the possibility of continued parochial interests that may be retained by these board members.  He thinks perhaps the board should be made up of totally new board members.  Ironically, in the mediation only a couple of consumer advocate-types supported this type of approach.  Everyone else believed that using the existin ISO board members makes more sense since they all have experience.  We supported a board makeup weighted in favor of PJM so that implementation of the PJM system would be assured.  Pat seems to think this presents too much of a political problem.

Pat also expressed concern that FERC not take action that would upset the existing, functioning markets.  He said FERC should not force a result if it does not know what the outcome will be and could disrupt the existing markets.  He questioned whether they should take a different, slower approach in the northeast, perhaps putting some regional functions into place soon (e.g., interregional transmission planning and expansion) and put off other issues (a single real time balancing market) that may be harder to implement at first.  Pat says that technology assessment is a big issue and can be a show stopper if it is not done correctly.  Under the PJM proposal, the new RTO would form by the end of the year and would start market design (based on the PJM system) immediately.  Doing an upfront assesment could delay implementation significantly.  He said perhaps some things can be done sooner than 18-24 months.  If he is thinking that long-term is 18-24 months, then we could be okay because the PJM plan takes 24 months to implement.  But, his statements on technical assessment are troubling and sound like he may be willing to delay the startup of market design until this takes place.

On the positive side, Nora Brownell reminded everyone that New York and PJM have very similar systems but they have a lot of problems working together and that these problems may be a hindrance to the developing retail markets.  She seems to think that things cannot remain as they are.

Nothing was decided and it is unclear when FERC will issue an order in this proceeding.  We will keep you posted.

Sarah


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

Lloyd Will
09/11/2000 03:20 PM
To: Keith Fraley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole
La/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Marc Bir/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Chen/Corp/Enron@Enron, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Ramesh Swaminathan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Price Spikes

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 03:17 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           09/11/2000 01:46 PM

To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Price Spikes

FYI.  A good paper.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

Christi L Nicolay
09/11/2000 01:46 PM
To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, John Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Price Spikes

Steve--Thanks.  This paper sheds alot of light on why Cal. is problematic.
Jeff, Jim S., and I talked about it today because of Kevin's desire to be
able to float his entire position against the pool and the reg. group idea
that some "penalty" or separate charge should be attributed to those that
cause the big congestion (primarily because of the Cal. problem that day of
is cheaper than day ahead due to the caps.)

Steve Walton
09/07/2000 09:13 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Price Spikes

Christi,
 I found this to be a very interesting paper on the California Price Spikes.
The conclusion is that price caps are infact creating part of the problem.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Walton/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 08:52
PM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 09/06/2000 12:29:49 AM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: wgibson@nwppc.org, steve.walton@enron.com, philip.h.carver@state.or.us,
blsilverstein@bpa.gov, adavis@state.mt.us, lnordell@state.mt.us,
lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, dave.robertson@gt.pge.com, kewh@dynegy.com,
arneo@ep.cted.wa.gov
cc:
Subject: Price Spikes

The attached paper (which was presented to the OPUC by its author last
month) provides a nice summary of some of the reasons behind the turmoil
in California.

Carl

 - VanVactor-PriceSpikes081400.PDF


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
dilia.ramos-cavazos@sabre.com.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Return-Path: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
Received: from mailhub2.sabre.com ([192.168.133.89]) by
          email2.sabre.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
id
          G3ZDCP00.C89 for <dilia.ramos@email2.sabre.com>; Mon, 13 Nov
          2000 14:38:49 -0600
Received: from mailgate1.sabre.com (mailgate1.sabre.com [144.9.158.91])
 by mailhub2.sabre.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA29621
 for <dilia.ramos@sabre.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:38:48 -0600 (CST)
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by mailgate1.sabre.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA21555
 for <dilia.ramos@sabre.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:24:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id
PAA20715
 for <dilia.ramos@sabre.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:24:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id
<Tac1c0a264fdad0073f@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<dilia.ramos@sabre.com>;
 Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:24:42 -0600
Subject: NDA-Sabre Corporation
To: dilia.ramos@sabre.com
Cc: Dovie.Keprta@enron.com, Leslie.Hansen@enron.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFAF2BE53F.5C418372-ON86256996.006F94BD@enron.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:24:04 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3
(Intl)|21 March 2000) at
 11/13/2000 02:20:10 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
 Boundary="0__=86256996006F94BD8f9e8a93df938690918c86256996006F94BD"
Content-Disposition: inline


MWilczek@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 1:00 and 21:00 in the September 30,
2001
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA 20001006B to verify
prices:

HQ:  18:00 and 19:00
NE:  18:00 and 19:00
OH:  18:00 and 19:00
PJM: 18:00 and 19:00

Prices in the October 1, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


This is a copy of your message sent to Chloee32@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I was surfing through the pictures on this web site and ran across yours.  I found you attractive and your profile to be interesting!  Take a look at my profile, I think we have similar interests.  (At the very least we are the same height)  Anyway drop me a line if you would like to talk more.

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=65685

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: NEAL WEINBERG
on PRODUCT REVIEWS

10/18/01 - Today's focus: Intrusion detection management
Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Intrusion detection systems from Cisco, ISS offer the best
management features
* Links related to Network World product reviews
* Featured reader resource
____________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by Opticom

Unable to get budget approval for new infrastructure devices?
Maximize the capital investments you already have. . . Working
with your existing NMS, Opticom's iView provides value-added
network intelligence to service providers and enterprises for
increasing operational efficiencies. ROiView(tm) demonstrates how
improvements in asset utilization, vendor management and
capacity planning help your bottom line.
Go to:
http://nww1.com/go/3467499a.html and see for yourself!
____________________________________________________________
Getting certified? Ensure your success with practice tests!

Network World and Boson Software partner to conveniently bring
you affordable, high-quality technical practice tests. Loaded
with more than 200 questions highly rated Boson tests help you
prepare for your certification exams from today's leading
companies such as Cisco, Compaq, IBM, Hewlett Packard, IBM,
Linux, Microsoft and Sun. Visit
http://nww1.com/go/1015netsmart.html

____________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Intrusion detection management

By Neal Weinberg

In our last report, we detailed the performance of five
network-based intrusion detection systems - products from
Cisco, Computer Associates, Enterasys Networks, Intrusion.com
and Internet Security Systems. This time, we'll look at how
these products tested for management and other features.

Managing a large network of sensors is typically achieved
through a three-tiered architecture: a central management
console, sensors and an event collector that off-loads
processing from the management console but reports back to it.
Under this arrangement, one event collector manages up to 50
sensors, for example, but each management console supports
multiple event collectors. All the vendors except CA have
embraced this model. CA doesn't use the event collector, just
the sensor and management console.

Cisco and Internet Security Systems (ISS) tied for top honors
in this category. Cisco's Secure Policy Manager, which runs on
Windows NT/98/2000, supports the best event management along
with a highly intuitive, logically designed interface that was
a breeze to use. Items were color-coded and easily sorted, and
we could configure which fields we wanted displayed, easily
viewing more (or less) detail as we specified.

The ISS RealSecure Manager, which resides on Windows 2000/NT or
Solaris platforms, is on par with Cisco's Secure Policy
Manager, supporting excellent event management, good reporting
and the best integration of applications.

CA, Enterasys and Intrusion.com were a step below, but were
still good in this category.

CA's eTrust Intrusion Detection Management, which runs on
Windows 98/NT/2000 and Millennium Edition platforms, delivered
the best statistics reporting of all five products tested. Its
reports were comprehensive and complete. But eTrust was limited
by the fact that it used several different applications that
should have been integrated.

While Enterasys' Web-browser based Dragon Policy Manager had
good reports and statistics, its event management wasn't as
robust as the other products.

Intrusion.com's RealSecure appliance was the easiest to
install. Within 15 minutes, we were up and running with minimal
tweaks. The Cisco Secure IDS, an appliance, also was easy to
install, but because the product supports so many advanced
settings and configurations, it was easy to get lost trying to
find things.

Finally, all of the products supported a full complement of IDS
features. Cisco Secure ID supported the largest database of
known attack signatures, while Intrusion.com's database was the
smallest. Enterasys supported the most granular attack
database, providing more details about attacks than the other
products.

For the full report, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2001/1008rev.html

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Neal Weinberg:

Neal Weinberg is features editor at Network World, in charge
of product reviews, Buyer's Guides, technology primers,
how-tos, issue-oriented feature stories and the Technology
Insider series. You can reach him at mailto:nweinber@nww.com.
_______________________________________________________________
Promote your services and generate qualified leads!  Register
on Buy IT, NW Fusion's Vendor Directory and RFP Center.  It's
cost-effective and eliminates the headaches of finding new
business.  List your company today and access millions of
dollars in RFPs posted by active buyers.  Go to NW Fusion now!
http://www.nwfusion.newmediary.com/091201nwwprovnwltr1

_______________________________________________________________
RELATED LINKS

IDS tools get more selective
InfoWorld, 06/12/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0612idstools.html

Intrusion battleground evolves
Network World, 10/08/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2001/1008bg.html

The archive for Reviews is:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Audio Primers

Are you behind on the basics of technologies such as ATM, IP
Multicast and VPNs? Check out our library of audio primers -
quick explanations of networking topics and technologies,
including IPv6, SANs and DSL vs. cable. These less-than-10-
minute primers will not only explain how these technologies
work, but they'll also show you through slides and diagrams.
http://www.nwfusion.com/primers/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


The information you needed for 1100, roughly 310K, should be a firm book
variance as well on the other side.  Portfolio accounting should have a
variance that offsets this(hopefully we have not already taken it, I will
look).  This means you will not have any actuals on it for FRED.  I will
start looking for dec info you just requested.
PL


Weekly meeting with:
Rick Buy
Bill Bradford
Debbie Brackett
Philippe Bibi
Ted Murphy
David Port
Stephen Stock
Vince Kaminski
Beth Perlman
Sally Beck


Hello Richard,

You have 37 NEW MESSAGES in your INBOX online at http://www.golfq.com/ some of which may be last minute promotions up to 1/2 OFF from courses in your area... To read your messages, login with:

Your userID: FAIRWAY
If you have forgotten your password, select "Forgot My Password" and submit Your email address: richard.ring@enron.com

To be REMOVED from the future newsletter distribution and/or Weekly Inbox Status, once you login, select "Edit My Profile", then select "No" for "newsletter" and/or "Inbox Status"... To DELETE your profile from our database, you may reply to this email with request for deletion.

The GolfQ.Com Newsletter will be coming your way within the next 24 hours... Some of the topics will include:

1) Last Chance for Q-PARTNERS MEETING in Houston and Dallas on Tuesday and Wednesday Feb. 5th & 6th.
2) February Promotions
3) The 2002 Wear Your Wildest Tournament at Waterwood Resort (between Houston and Dallas)
4) Win 1 of 4 PGA Pro-Am Spots at a tournament at River Ridge
5) Upcoming Online Store
6) And whatever else I can dream up by then!

Thanks.

Soheil
Online Username: ADMIN


I am interested in the online version.  My login id is:  mmccon1
thanks,
m


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
01:50 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           04/13/2000 01:29 PM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT,
patty.soria@halliburton.com, elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com,
apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yolanda Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: : Rescuing Hug

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 04/13/2000 01:18:50 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: : Rescuing Hug

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

 <<RESCUINGHUG.JPG>>

 - RESCUINGHUG.JPG


Ok, as long as you try your "darnedest"!  :-)

Should we also ask Dave Perrino or anyone else?

Should I coordinate with Joseph to get a room in your office?

Jennifer

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	06/20/2001 03:55 PM

		 To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Meeting with CERA next week

Let's do it. I'll do my darnedest to make it.

Best,
Jeff

	Jennifer Thome
	06/20/2001 02:59 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting with CERA next week

Jeff:

As I told you I was planning to do, I have arranged a meeting with CERA next
week (I will be in town for the infrastructure conference) on Wednesday, June
27 at 9am in the Enron office.  We will meet with Mike and Peter (see bios
below). Please let me know ASAP if this does not work for you.  I explained
to Mike that we really appreciate their research and just wanted a quick
meeting with them face to face.

Jennifer

Michael Zenker
Director, Western North America Energy
Oakland, CA

Michael Zenker has over 15 years, experience in the energy industry. He is an
expert on wholesale electricity and natural gas markets in western North
America. Mr. Zenker has extensive experience with California,s new
electricity market and with power generation strategy and asset divestiture.
He has assisted clients with retail marketing strategies and in procuring gas
and electricity, and gas and electric transmission capacity. Mr. Zenker was
most recently the Manager of Energy Trading at Southern California Edison,
where he was responsible for electricity and gas trading, and dispatching
Edison,s nuclear, coal, gas/oil, hydro, and power contract resources. He was
also responsible for natural gas transportation and storage at Southern
California Edison. Mr. Zenker holds an MBA and a BS in Nuclear Engineering
from the University of California.

Peter F. Moritzburke
Associate
Oakland, CA

Western North American energy
Western power markets
Western and regional market dynamics
Western wholesale electricity markets
Generation asset divestiture
Generation asset values
Western fundamentals analysis
Peter Moritzburke specializes in the analysis of western US electricity and
gas markets and evolving regional energy market dynamics. He has experience
in analyzing both US and Latin American energy markets. Prior to joining CERA
he worked with the Independent Energy Producers Association in California
assisting in negotiations of agreements for the Western Power Exchange
(WEPEX). Mr. Moritzburke holds a master's degree and a BA from the University
of California.


Gary,

In preparation for the Outlook migration, we have come up with the basic structure of the public folders needed for EWS Legal.  The initial access to create and/or rename folders should be given to the users identified next to the group and/or subgroup (i.e. for Enron Global Markets - grant access to Alan Aronowitz and Nita Garcia).   Upon completion of the migration, the assistant assigned to each of these groups will procure access to others in her group and create additional folders as they may be needed.

Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the attached information.

Thanks.

Janette Elbertson and Nony Flores


Vince:

Can you give me some background on Bogdan?

Many thanks.  Shawn

---------------------- Forwarded by Shawn Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/12/2001 08:12 AM ---------------------------

Awenda2000@cs.com on 02/11/2001 11:26:12 PM
To: shawn.cumberland@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Bogdan Szopa - CV

Dear Shawn,
It was a pleasure talking to you today. I will call you upon my return from
Europe. In the meantime we will stay in touch via e-mail.

Enclosed is my curriculum vitae.

Best regards,
Bogdan M. Szopa

 - BOGDAN  res..doc


FYI.? The attached documents contain the errata we expect to file with the
Commission later today.? As you can see, the changes are not substantive.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent:?? Thursday, April 27, 2000 5:58 PM
To:???? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC
Subject:??????? GIR

 <<ld2d-#69954-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#69955-1.DOC>>

Here's the draft errata filing (plus adding 2 new parties) for tomorrow.? Can
you circulate?? -- Glen

 - ld2d-#69954-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69955-1.DOC


----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 03:09 PM -----

	Stacy E Dickson
	03/15/2001 10:48 AM

		 To: tporter@hess.com
		 cc: Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Credit Language

Mr Porter:

Per the request of Cary Carrabine, attached please find my review of the
credit that you proposed to add to the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.
Please call me with your comments at (713) 853-5705.

Sincerely,

Stacy Dickson


Sherry,

I am in receipt of your draft of a GISB between  HPL and OGE Energy
Resources, Inc.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Ok - so here is the latest on Aruba.  We have decided to go through Continental vacations instead of fun jet for 2 reasons.  One, direct flights on Continental to Aruba and two, it is slightly less expensive.  Dates have changed slightly.  We are leaving at 1:30 on Tuesday, Oct. 16 (arrive at 7 ish) and return on Saturday the 20th st 3:30ish.

If you guys are interested you could do either, wed thru sun on fun jet or tues thru sat on continental vacations.  Dee Espinoza at TAP booked us.  And with either trip, you can cancel up to 24 hours in advance without penalty.

Let me know if you have any questions

Kim