Amita

Please see below + the attachment.

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 22/09/2000 18:51
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  RAISLERK@sullcrom.com                           22/09/2000 18:13

To: justin.boyd@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LME

I agree with your point in Ned's memo.  We would not be relying on Part 30.10
at all for non-LME business.  That business would be subject to the CFTC's
swap exemption.

I am enclosing a directive with respect to marketing pursuant to your
request.  I will be sending you a separate memo on marketing limitations that
apply to Enron Metals Ltd.  These are not new and should be well known to
MG.  Let's discuss.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - LME.doc


Over the last couple of years we have had numerous social events including holiday parties, company-sponsored outings to Edgefield, post-quarterly meeting outings, and going away parties.  While I hope that people thoroughly enjoy themselves, I ask that you keep in mind that we all have to act professionally and responsibly during and after these events.  I have been working with Chris Calger and Amy Fitzpatrick to put together some guidelines for company-sponsored social events:

The company will provide soft drinks, beer, and wine.  You may choose to order other beverages at your expense.
Functions will run for a specified period of time.  If there is an open bar, we will establish a time certain after which Enron will not pay for any additional drinks.
If you require assisance getting home, please contact a taxi and submit the fare for expense reimbursement with no questions asked.  The last thing in the world we want is to have people break the law or put their safety and the safety of others in jeopardy.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks for your cooperation.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

Biliana Pehlivanova <pehlivanova@sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com> on 01/28/2000
11:54:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AIESEC

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

The following are the  personal and work e-mail addresses of the Polish
trainees in College Station.

Sylwester Rutkowski  sylwesterr@usa.net, sylwester.rutkowski@destia.com
Patricia Dalecka  pdalecka@hotmail.com, patrycia.dalecka@destia.com
Danusia Mas   danusia.mas@destia.com
Lidia Olczyk   lolczyk@usa.net, lidia.olczyk@destia.com
Robert Lyczak   rlyczak@yahoo.com, robert.lyczak@destia.com

I would like to invite you to join us for a paintball game next Saturday,
Feb 5th. The purpose of this event is to develop team building among our
student members, Board of Advisors, and corporate clients.

In addition, I would like to invite you to participate in our Mock
Sales day on Saturday, Feb. 12th.  During this day, the new members will
first receive training on AIESEC sales/knowledge and then role play with our
Board of Advisors and alumni acting as company
representatives. Sharing your AIESEC and work experience would be a
valuable contribution to our training program.

I will get in touch with you regarding these events in the beginning of
next week, as soon as I have the time and place finalized.

I appreciate your interest in working with us.

Best regards,

Biliana Pehlivanova
Vice President of Incoming Exchange
AIESEC Houston


From the 11/26/01 New Dem Daily.  Please let the Colorado DLC know what
you think.

With the U.S. economy in recession and the unemployment rate up above 5
percent, there is naturally some speculation that the millions of former
welfare recipients who began working since the 1996 national welfare reform
legislation was enacted may now be at special risk of falling back onto
public assistance. Indeed, within the last week, columnists E.J. Dionne of
The Washington Post and Bob Herbert of The New York Times have suggested
that the successful welfare reform experiment of the 1990s might soon fall
apart in the wake of recession.

But the facts suggest otherwise.  In an article for the forthcoming
January/February 2002 edition of Blueprint magazine, which will focus on
the next steps in welfare reform, Blueprint Executive Editor Tom Mirga
takes a look at the record and finds abundant evidence that welfare
reform's success story remains stubbornly intact so far despite the new
pressures of a slowing economy
(http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=3961&kaid=114&subid=143).

Exhibit A of Mirga's case is a mid-October survey by the Welfare to Work
Partnership, a voluntary association of more than 20,000 companies who have
agreed to hire welfare recipients.  According to Rodney Carroll, the
president and CEO of the Partnership, 57 percent of the firms he surveyed
said they were still hiring entry-level workers, and another 18 percent
predicted they would be hiring such workers by the end of the
year.  Eighty-seven percent of the firms reported that they had not laid
off any former welfare recipients during the previous two months - which
included the period immediately after the September 11 terrorist attacks
when the travel and entertainment industries took a huge hit.

Mirga also looked at the official numbers in the five states with the
largest welfare caseloads: California, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania, and
Michigan.  In all but Michigan, caseload levels remained stable at
historically low levels since last fall, when the 1990s boom first stalled
nationally.  Michigan experienced a 3 percent increase in caseloads between
September 2000 and March of 2001, but the level of public assistance is
still only about a third of what it was at its peak in the 1980s.

In Texas and Pennsylvania, Mirga discovered that some of the upward
pressure on caseload levels is attributable to deliberate policy changes
that allowed welfare recipients to retain some public assistance while
working in private sector jobs.  While expressing considerable concern
about the effects of a sustained period of rising unemployment, state
officials remain very optimistic about the long-term job prospects of their
former and current clients.

What they understand - and many persistent critics of work-based welfare
reform don't - is that the welfare system has undergone a profound cultural
change since 1996.  Michigan welfare director Doug Howard, who is also
president of the American Public Human Services Association, says work
requirements have permanently and dramatically changed the attitudes of
both recipients and welfare administrators.  "New entrants now come in with
the expectation that welfare is temporary and transitional and that they
need to move into employment and help their family," Howard says.  "There's
been a cultural change for our staff as well, a new attitude about moving
families quicker."

New York welfare agency spokesman Jack Madden echoes this belief that a
more work-oriented system will help recipients weather hard economic
times:  "[They] now have a work history, they understand the importance of
work in their personal lives and they will be able to jump back into
employment when the economy picks up steam again.  You have to compare that
with the old welfare system, which kept people in poverty regardless of the
economy."

The debate over the economy and welfare reform is of particular importance
because the 1996 law is up for reauthorization in Congress next year.  Many
of the original critics of work-based welfare reform, having grudgingly
admitted its success, are now calling for a significant scaling back of
work requirements and time limits on grounds that they can only work in a
red-hot economy with plentiful jobs.

No one is arguing we shouldn't be worried about the impact of the economic
slowdown on welfare recipients, many of whom do not yet qualify for
unemployment insurance if they do lose their jobs.  Today's relatively
positive picture could clearly get worse.  But the answer is to intensify,
not retreat from, the new system of job placement, support services, and
assistance to "make work pay" through health insurance and supplemental
income support, that was at the heart of the 1996 reforms.

The stubborn good news about welfare reform, even in relatively tough
economic times, provides ample evidence that it's no time to turn back from
the most successful social policy innovation of the 1990s.


Sharon/Kriste,

If there are going to be revisions to the leave policy, I suggest that we
make major ones, including a segregation of FMLA leave from other types of
leave --i.e., two separate policies.  Let's talk about this on Tuesday -----
Majorly important!!

Michelle

Sharon Butcher@ENRON
01/13/2000 05:38 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Leave Policy

Dear Michelle and Kriste:   Please review and let me have your comments.
Thanks.  Sharon
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron on 01/13/2000
05:32 PM ---------------------------

Elaine Paul
12/14/99 08:57 PM
To: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Tosoni/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Leave Policy

Here are a few edits to the Approved Time Off and Leaves of Absence policy.

Benefits has not included a "second or third opinion by another health care
provider paid for by the Company" as it has significant implications to our
LTD plan and has created at least one problem that I am aware of in the past.
We will need to think through what the certification document might look like
and would look to you for some guidelines.   The concern I have is around
privacy and use of information given potential regulation.
Cynthia believes that we should run FMLA concurrent with sick time.  I agree
and have noted that in the document.

Sharon, could you please review the wording to ensure I haven't missed
something here from a legal perspective.  I will follow-up with you by phone
shortly.

Susan, here are the "long-since promised" wording changes we propose.

Thanks,

Elaine


Mark:
FYI. I'm meeting with Lisa Mellencamp tomorrow to discuss what, if anything,
legal should be doing with respect to these counterparties.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/09/99 06:07
PM ---------------------------

Molly Harris
11/09/99 04:27 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Margin Exception Report

Carol

John forwarded your request to me.  Please find attached our latest report.
If you have any questions or would like me to join you and Lisa tomorrow, let
me know.

Thank you
Molly
6-6363


Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

PJM Announces two additional dates for the one-day course Fundamentals of
Available Capacity which will explain the way that capacity will be handled for
PJM West.

January 29, 2002 - Pittsburgh, PA Airport Hyatt
January 10, 2002 - Desmond Hotel, Malvern, PA

Times: 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.  (Registration will begin at 8:00 a.m.)

Target audience:
 Load Serving Entities (LSEs), Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs), and
Generation
 Owners who serve load in PJM West or plan to participate in the PJM West
Available
 Capacity Market, and
 LSEs, EDCs, and Generation Owners who currently use eCapacity. eCapacity II is
a
 redesign of the current version of eCapacity. eCapacity II will handle both the
PJM East
 Unforced Capacity Market and the PJM West Available Capacity Market.

Course topics and additional information and a registration form can be found
from the PJM.com Training page at
http://www.pjm.com/training/training_index.html.

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


On or about Oct .17th I returned a call to  Kathy Pantolo (sp) at
818-846-8141 X 506 (according to my phone log).  As I recall the reason for
her
calling the office was that the Sept. invoice had just arrived and she
questioned NGI price. The scope of our conversation was limited to gas
 prices and how high they were, this is the only conversation I can recall
having with Providence Hospital ...

I hope this sheds a little more light on this issue.
Roger


No, Not EACH TANK per day.

For example, Scenario #1 - of the 8 tanks that we have here.....
Today, we WILL receive at least 20K BBLS of sweet, and it will go into one
tank. We will also receive more than 500 BBL of sour and put it into a
different tank.
Tomorrow, we will pump out of that tank, and will receive into another tank
at least 20K of sweet.
So, within these two days, we will have exceeded the limit on two tanks.

Scenario #2:
Today, we WILL receive at least 20K BBLS of sweet and it will go into two
tanks. We will also receive more than 500 BBLS of sour into a different tank.
Tomorrow, we will pump sweet out of one tank and will continue to go into the
other sweet tank.

So,,
On any given day, we WILL receive/pump in excess of 500 BBLS per day. This
will happen with the use of at least 2 tanks, possibly 3. However, we might
have four tanks full, but not flowing.

Sorry to make this so confusing.

Larry Campbell
07/31/2001 11:38 AM
To: Kay Woods/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EOTT Crude Oil Tanks-Rev 1

Kay, am I to understand that EACH TANK listed below exceeds the 500 bbl per
day throughput threshold?  This is the information I need.  Sorry for not
understanding or making myself clear....

Kay Woods
07/26/2001 10:35 AM
To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bob Bandel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EOTT Crude Oil Tanks-Rev 1

Ooops! Forgot to add S/N's. Not all tanks had one.
On most any given day, we flow at least 25,000 BBL/Day at the Jal Tank Farm.
Today, we may come out of Tank 1408 with sweet and go into Tank 1426 with
sweet. We also, may come out of Tank 1214 with sour and go into Tank 1065
with sour.

Tank 1214 Sour
S/N ??
78,000 BBL Capacity

Tank 1065 Sour
S/N ??
49,960 BBLS

Tank 1488 Sour
S/N ??
40,068 BBLS

Tank 1433 Sour
S/N BM2208
120,320 BBLS

Tank 1435 Sweet
S/N BM2208
120, 480 BBLS

Tank 1408 Sweet
S/N ??
77.367 BBLS

Tank 1426 Sweet
S/N BM213
120,004 BBLS

Tank 1434 Sweet
S/N BM2208
120,005 BBLS

Dublin Station:
Tank 396
62,000 BBLS
Avg 36,000 per week. Will pump 13,000 in a 24 hour period.

Hope this helps
Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Woods/ET&S/Enron on 07/24/2001 09:18
AM ---------------------------

Larry Campbell
07/17/2001 04:18 PM
To: Team Andrews@Enron, Team Big-Lake/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Eunice-Jal/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Eunice-Kermit/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Eunice/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Kermit-WT2/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
KermitTurbine/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Monahans/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Spraberry@Enron, Duane Konen/Remote/Eott@Eott, Richard
Espinoza/Remote/Eott@Eott, Johnnie White/Remote/Eott@Eott, Ray
Noseff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay Woods/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Myron
Maresch/Houston/Eott@Eott, Wade Jordan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Foree/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Clark/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Randall Mobley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Newman/HPL/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bandel/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James R
Lawrence/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: EOTT Crude Oil Tanks

A newly revised rule (Subpart HH) has just been implemented by the EPA
concerning curde oil tanks with a daily throughput of equal to or greater
than 500 bbls. per day.  If there is any tank within your teams area of
responsiblity which equals or exceeds the 500 bbls. per day throughput
criteria, please provide to me the following:

 tank name/serial number

 tank size

 average daily throughput

Thanks for your help in this matter....


please ignore my e-mail re utility.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Thanks for this clear update. Look forward to hearing outcome of Trustee's
receipt and review of previous correspondence.

From: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 06/04/2001 11:15 AM GDT
To: Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Ross Sankey/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Philip Davies/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Raphael
Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Brod/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Nailia
Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Shaw/ENRON@EUEnronXGate

Subject: RE: FW: M.1853 EDF/EnBW - EDF VPP Trustee

All

I talked to the Trustee late Friday. They are reluctant and not intending to
meet with anyone. The want to keep their independence although they did say
that at this point the process has been one sided. They are, however, very
interested in getting as much information as possible for us and others. We
should provide them copies of all the letters that we have sent to the MTF,
EdF,  and PWC as they have not received any of that information as of yet.
With that we should include a cover note and points on the PIM that we have
not covered.

When questioned on what their role was, they explained that it was to monitor
the execution of EdF's responsibilities, set up the auction process and
perform the auction. They must insure that the product offered by EDF is
reasonably coherent with the conditions agreed to with the MTF, and finally
they must insure transparency.

On the possibilities to changes certain terms conditions in the decision.
Their role is to ensure that the remedy as agreed is followed through (they
have no power to ensure that the greater purpose of the remedy - i.e. promote
competition is fulfilled). Thus any fundamental changes on conditions that
were precisely stated in the remedy (i.e. noon notification and price level -
stated in the confidential version of the decision) will unlikely be changed,
on these issues we can give it a go, but I see very little probability for
success. Other issues that have not been well defined such as the schedule,
type of  auction (SMP vs PAB) could possibly be influenced.

Bruno

 -----Original Message-----
From:  de Gaulle, Pierre
Sent: 03 June 2001 18:10
To: Gaillard, Bruno
Cc: Sankey, Ross; Davies, Philip; Brun, Raphael; Brod, Simon; Styles, Peter;
Dindarova, Nailia
Subject: Re: FW: M.1853 EDF/EnBW - EDF VPP Trustee

Bruno,

Let's send before meeting with the Trustee a letter similar to EdF and PWC
letters, but incorporating comments on the PIM.

Let's prepare a draft tomorrow, that we will circulate within the group.

Thanks

Pierre

From: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 01/06/2001 18:01
To: Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT, Ross Sankey/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Philip
Davies/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Raphael Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Brod/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: M.1853 EDF/EnBW - EDF VPP Trustee

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicole.Hacker@cec.eu.int [mailto:Nicole.Hacker@cec.eu.int]
Sent: 01 June 2001 17:55
To: Gaillard, Bruno
Cc: Dietrich.Kleeman@cec.eu.int; Gwenaelle.NOUET@cec.eu.int;
Ulrich.Diez@cec.eu.int; Ana.Arana-Antelo@cec.eu.int; pbreen@dc.com
Subject: M.1853 EDF/EnBW - EDF VPP Trustee

Dear Mr. Gaillard,
please find below the contact details for the EDF trustee of the VPP
auctions:
Patrick Breen
Deloitte Consulting
Stonecutter Court
Stonecutter Street
London EC4A 4TR
Telephone: +44 207 3038703
e-mail: p.breen@dc.com

Best regards,

Nicole Hacker
European Commission
DG Competition
Merger Task Force
Phone: +32 2 299 93 91
Fax: +32 2 296 43 01
e-mail: nicole.hacker@cec.eu.int


Kelly,
I'm gonna be early this week.(for once)

I'll take Dallas as my loser this week.

Talk to you later.
Theresa


more information
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 12:47
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/27/2001 09:42 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Panda Energy

Kay,

Our deal with Panda Energy involves 4 LM units.  I believe that this is the
total number of units in our current LV Co Gen project.  Ben is planning to
talk with Lee at GE.

I talked with Panda this morning.  They do not have a fixed close date.  They
are working off the assumption that closing will ocurr within 4-6 weeks of
signing the Letter Agreement.  I believe that this is doable.

Chris Booth will provide you with respective unit delivery dates.  He is
working with Matt Tezyk to determine the serial #'s (apparently GE has not
yet assigned serial #'s to the units).  What price are we assigning to the
LLC member interests in the Northwestern Letter Agreement?  Let's stay
consistent with that document.  The person who will be signing for Panda is
Gary Hubbard, Senior Vice President.

The purchase price is $16.45 MM per unit with a 10% development fee payable
to ENA upon execution of the Letter Agreement.  The balance of the purchase
price will escrowed by Panda upon approval of the Facility Agreement (similar
to Intergen structure) and payable to ENA at closing.  Is this the pricing
information that you need to establish the maximum liability amont?

Ben:  We need to talk re: the transformers.  We quoted Panda $950K per unit
for the two transformers.  It is not clear if the transformers will work for
Panda w.r.t. interconnect voltage and plant configuration.  If we are
re-loading with more LM's, do we need to keep the transformers for our use at
LV Co-Gen?

Kathleen:  I have a call into Bill Lamb at Panda regarding the CA's.  I will
let you know when I hear back from him.

Fred

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/26/2001 06:15 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Panda Energy

Fred,

Dale Rasmussen has been handling the breakout contracts for the LV CoGen
project, and I think the form is in good shape. However, the breakout
contract is for all the LV Co Gen units, but that is easy enough to fix. Does
GE know this is coming?

What are you projecting for a closing date?

 We need the unit numbers (original and serial), associated delivery dates,
price attributable to the units (maximum liability amount), price to sell the
LLC member interests, and the contact persons from Panda for the contract.
Will there be a development fee, and if so, how much?

If you get me the particulars of the deal we can work on it in house.  We
have the forms, so we can get cracking without outside counsel.  In fact,
I've been working on the form letter agreement today in connection with the
other deal.  Retaining outside counsel requires internal approval, which I'm
sure we can get in the next day or two, assuming no conflict of interest. I
can get started on the process if you are ready.

If you think these guys are serious, we can set up the LLC's.  We may want
two LLC's if the total price is in excess of $50mm.  Kathleen, please talk to
me before we do this as I think we should discuss the slate of officers.

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/26/2001 05:56 PM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Panda Energy

Steve:

I talked with Ben this afternoon and understand that we are ready to proceed
with Panda Energy in a transaction involving the sale of member interests in
special purpose entities associated with the four(4) LV units.  I have left a
message with Panda letting them know that we are prepared to proceed and will
begin preparing a set of draft definitive agreements for their review.  I
have asked Panda to confirm that they are ready to receive these documents
and proceed.  I understand that you are in Houston.  Please call/see me
tomorrow morning so that we can discuss this transaction.

Kay:  We need to prepare a draft set of definitive agreements for this
transaction.  Can Carolyn complete this while you are in New York?  Also,
what is the status of the LM Breakout contract for the 4 LV units.  Let me
know.

Kathleen:  We need to confirm tomorrow morning that we have received executed
CA's from Panda.  I have the CA execution originals for the four Panda
entities at my desk for Ben's signature.  These need to be received prior to
sending Panda the definitive agreements.  We will fax signature pages to Ben
tomorrow.

Chris:  See me tomorrow morning to discuss the technical spec's that were
sent to Panda

I will be at my desk by 8 am tomorrow morning.

Thanks,
Fred
x35406


We could catch the show after the Art Car Ball. Don't worry about me. I will
sleep in Friday morning while you are at work.

-----Original Message-----
From: EHS1100@aol.com [mailto:EHS1100@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Tex1100@aol.com
Subject: Eleven Hundred Springs current calander 4/01

If you are getting these emails by mistake or no longer wish to get them,
type "remove" and send it back at us.

Here is the current calander, but we are adding shows all the time. For up
to
date info be sure to check our website www.ElevenHundredSprings &
www.1100springs.

APRIL
Fri 13 Southern Junction

Sat 14 Cabaret w/ Charlie

Thurs 19 Outskirts in Wichita Falls

Fri 20 Golden Light

Sat 21 Blue Light

Thurs 26 Satalite Lounge in Houston

Fri 27 Roadhouse in Huntsville

Sat 28 Sons of Hermann Hall w/ Billy Jo Shaver

MAY
Thurs 3 Private Party

Friday 4 Jovitas in Austin 8-10pm

Sat 5 Cabaret in Bandera

Fri 11 Lone Star Park in Grand Prarie 7-10

Sat 12 Dans Bar in Denton

Thurs 17 Continental Club in Austin

Sat 19 Boars Nest in Dallas

Sun 20 Private Party

Thurs 24 Neon Spur in Wichita Falls

Friday 25 Blaines Pub

Sat 26 Private Party

Sun 27 Blanco's in Houston for the "River Oaks Music Festival"

Thurs 31 Casbeers in San Antonio

JUNE
Fri 1 Sangerhalle in New Braunfells

Sat 2 Private Party

Thurs 7 Surf Club in Corpus

Fri 8 Blancos in Houston

Sat 9 Private Party

Fri 15 Porchlight Music Thing in Milford (south of Waxahachie)

Thur 28 Love & War in Texas in Plano

Fri 29 White Elephant in Ft Worth

Sat 30 Americana Jam 2001 in Hico


(See attached file: HPLN1209.xls)

 - HPLN1209.xls


I don't know the YMCA's policy on rain outs so  I will assume that we still
have a game tonight.  Our game is at 7:45 tonight.  Please let me know if you
will be there.

Eric


Just got this. She is taking a harder line that Sen Dunn did yesterday. I'll wait to hear from them on the nonwaiver agreement. I'll find out what happened at today's meeting of the generators and Sen Dunn

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from your system.
Received: from lcmail2.lc.ca.gov	by PKNS.COM; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:07:58 -0700
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) id <0GGN005014BBA4@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for MLK@PKNS.com; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmsx05.senate.ca.gov ([165.107.183.35]) by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) with ESMTP id <0GGN0077T49WUK@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for MLK@PKNS.com; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by senmsx05.senate.ca.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <KRL3JH4D>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:04:26 -0700
Content-return: allowed
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:09:56 -0700
From: "Montgomery, Alexandra" <Alexandra.Montgomery@sen.ca.gov>
Subject: confidentiality agreement & document protocol
To: "'MLK@PKNS.com'" <MLK@PKNS.com>
Cc: "Paschal, Ronda" <Ronda.Paschal@sen.ca.gov>, "Drivon, Laurence" <Laurence.Drivon@sen.ca.gov>, "'ldrivon@drivonandtabak.com'" <ldrivon@drivonandtabak.com>
Message-id: <A9680A8ACC43D511A3A200508BAF06665C5E81@senmsx04.senate.ca.gov>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_BR8uwvpTv7M4z4zxH8f6Lg)"

Mike,

Attached are the Select Committee's Confidentiality Agreement and Document
Depository Protocol.  As Senator Dunn reiterated a number of times during
the hearing and meeting with you, the three conditions for compliance are
that Enron sign the attached confidentiality agreement, sign the attached
document depository protocol and deposit into the depository documents
responsive to the Select Committee's priority list of 16 document
categories.  These 3 conditions remain the same.  The Select Committee does
not agree to enter into a "protective order."  The attached confidentiality
agreement is intended to be just that and not "an outline for a proposed
protective order."

The Senator and Larry Drivon will review your proposed nonwaiver agreement
and get back to you on that after they have had a chance to do so.

Should you wish to discuss this further, please feel free to call Larry
Drivon at (916) 445-5831.

Alexandra
(916) 445-5831

 <<DOCUMENT REPOSITORY PROTOCOL GENERIC blank sign.doc>>

 <<Conf Agrmnt _Generic_July 17.doc>>

 - DOCUMENT REPOSITORY PROTOCOL GENERIC blank sign.doc
 - Conf Agrmnt _Generic_July 17.doc


Dear Candidate,
You were recently selected by The Office of  The Managing Director
for a free listing on The International Executive Guild's CD-ROM.
Our researchers gather information from many recognized
sources, including professional associations and societies, trade
organizations, newspaper and magazine publications, web
presence, and referrals from existing members.
As a highly respected professional in your field of expertise, we
believe your contributions merit very serious consideration for
inclusion on The International Executive Guild's CD-ROM.
To maintain the level of accuracy, we ask you to click on the
web address highlighted below and fill out the brief bit of
information required for inclusion.
There is no cost or obligation to be listed on The International
Executive Guild's CD-ROM.
Remember, this site is for executives, professionals, & entrepreneurs
only!
Congratulations,
Office of  the Managing Director

If you wish to be removed from our list, please submit your request
at the bottom of this email.

Registration Form
(US and Canada Only)

Please fill out this form if you would like to be included in the  registry. For accuracy and publication purposes, please complete and send this form at the earliest opportunity. There is no charge or obligation to be listed in The  Registry.

Your Name

Your Company

Title

Address

City

State or Province

Country
USACanada
ZIP/Postal Code

Day Time Telephone

Home Phone
(Not To Be Published)
Email

TO HELP US IN CONSIDERING YOUR APPLICATION, PLEASE TELL US A LITTLE ABOUT YOURSELF...

Your Business
(Financial Svcs, Banking, Computer Hardware, Software, Professional Svcs, Chemicals, Apparel, Aerospace, Food, Government, Utility, etc.)
Type of Organization
(Mfg, Dist/Wholesaler, Retailer, Law Firm,
Investment Bank, Commercial Bank, University,
Financial Consultants, Ad Agency, Contractor, Broker, etc.)
Your Business Expertise
(Corp.Mgmt, Marketing, Civil Engineering,
Tax Law, Nuclear Physics, Database Development, Operations, Pathologist, Mortgage Banking, etc.)
Major Product Line
(Integrated Circuits, Commercial Aircraft, Adhesives, Cosmetics, Plastic Components, Snack Foods, etc.)

Note: Submitting this form will be made by email, not by use of  www.  Confirmation of its delivery is made by browsing your outgoing mail.

Thank you for filling in this form, we will contact you with more information.

List Removal
Click Here


Ginger:

Could you please forward this along to the Quinn-Gillespie folks---David
Lugar in particular?  Thanks very much.

Others:
Attached are excerpts from the California Leg Analyst's Report--an
"independent" institution in Sacramento--on the electricity crisis, the plan
thus far to address it, and the effect that the solution might have on the
State's financial position.  Also have attached URL to full report.
http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/2001_pandi/pandi_toc_anl2001.html

Best,
Jeff


Dan, Keyspan / Gulf  bought out Crestar - Crestar holds the Alliance
capacity.  BP is taking assignment of only a portion the volume of the
contract with Enron.

Dan, can you call Bruce Kohrs @ Keyspan for final clarification and
confirmation.  403-205-7684

Thanks

Grant

Dan J Hyvl
05/14/2001 02:11 PM
To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: proposed amendment to CEMC/Enron Alliance AOS agreement

Grant,
 Question?  What is Gulf doing in these transactions.  Is it in place of
Crestar or BP or what?  Who can answer?


Take a look at my worksheet and let me know what you think.  Look at column H
in the Daily Activity tab, this shows my actual daily and monthly
injections.  Also, on 9/16/200, we did a storage transfer to NIPSCO for
500,000 dth.

Our total capacity is 6,050,607 dth.  We have all the tariff rules in the
Strg Rules tab.


As a follow up to our discussion earlier this week on commercialization of
mid and back office services and managing those responsibilities for EWS, I
will have a timeline for your review on Monday that will pinpoint key dates:
Unify conversion, EES absorption, HPL sale, commercialization, Todd Busby's
arrival, etc.  I will also have details of resource needs.  We can use this
to set internal expectations on the timing of successfully handling all of
these initiatives.  I will welcome your comments on the timeline.  --Sally


Vince:  I am very enthusiastic about your interest and possible
contributions towards a 22nd Century human blood system.  I have
attached a letter that discusses the endeavor.  Please note that it has
a built-in automatic release in the event you need to terminate.  It has
a confidentiality statement as well.  If it is acceptable, please sign
it and fax it back to me at 713 965 2114 at your earliest convenience.
Al Arfsten

 - Kaminski Acceptance  011601.doc


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 07:40 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	03/02/2001 04:53 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments-re:DWR Creditworthiness/Letter-re:Direct Access

 <<X22350.DOC>>  <<BILASALT.DOC>>

 - X22350.DOC
 - BILASALT.DOC


Here are our picks for the incoming class.

Gas

Analysts:

Gabrial Chavez
Nate Blackburn
Phillip Berry (Maybe for Sally Beck or Beth Perlman)
Sachin Gandhi
Miguel Nasser
James Wininger

Associates

Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Power

Analysts:

Elizabeth Johnston
Possey Martinez
Gary Justice

Associates:

Doug Seaworth
Dustin Collins
Eduardo Gil
Pearce Hammond
David Maskel
Michael Kelly

Please confirm how many of these we can lock up.

Lavo


REAALLY?? I see how it is.  Smell a free dinner and all of a sudden ya wanna
hang out


Vasant,

Can you send me the electronic version of the documents for Ben Gleason
(cost of capital)? I would like to play with the numbers and check a few
ideas.

Vince


Hey girls!  I can't believe I missed seeing y'all this weekend!  I'm so
sad............Farrell and I had to leave early the next morning cause he
had work - it's football season!  I told y'all he got a new job, right??
He is the JV Defensive Coordinator at Highland Park!  He loves it!
I would love to get together with y'all soon.  I will be in Austin this
weekend (and for all of the home games).  Are you going to Austin  for the
game this weekend, Susan?  Let's try and make plans to do something!
I can't believe that Elizabeth is engaged - I am so happy for her!  I
called her yesterday and left a message.  Do y'all know any details about
the wedding, etc.?  Chas and Laura have set their date - April 20, 2002!
We are all so excited!
Let me know what y'all's plans are for this weekend!
Miss you!
Steph
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------
   Hector Campos                12/21/2000 10:30 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: hocampos@hotmail.com
Subject: Address for Recommendations

Vince,

Please forward the recommendations to the following address:

2569 Windbreak Dr.
Alexandria, VA 22306

Don't forget to label each envelope, e.g. "Columbia", etc., and to sign
each envelope over the adhesive seal. I must receive the package
before the new year in order to meet the submission deadline.

Thank you for your time, and happy holidays.

-Hector


I ran a redline from the last version I had electronically.

I've forwarded the current version to Herman for his review and approval.
Due to some of the changes, Enron may need some revisions as well.

Kay


Ditto:  Caps, stink, but if they must be done in the short term, only do them
for residential (since of course the damage that wholesale prices will
inflict will grossly outweigh and alleged benefits). But any caps must be
accompanied by real, strucutural reforms.  Have a great time.  Please let us
know how it goes.  (I have a sneaking suspicion they listen to you more than
you let on.)

Best,
Jeff


Peter:

	At the request of Tanya Rohauer, I am advising that Enron North America Corp. is willing to sign the Net-Out Agreement that you forwarded.  Do you want to prepare the execution copies or do you want us to do so?

	As an aside, we do not understand the reference to Oct 3 in your e-mail.  That date has past and is inconsistent with payment dates for physical gas in general.  Also,  this refers only to the Net-Out Agreement.  Others will be contacting you concerning the Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement.

Thanks,

Jeff Hodge
713-853-6911


Jeff will be talking to Fielder on this.

SCE said at our meeting Monday that they DID NOT want to talk about these issues at the PHC -- they wanted to address it through the advice letters. This one shouldn't even be up an issue at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Pagano@sce.com [mailto:Matt.Pagano@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:35 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: dgrueneich@gralegal.com; dhuddles@enron.com; Diane.Romeyko@sce.com;
ehughes2@enron.com; gyoung2@enron.com; mday@gmssr.com;
mevans3@enron.com; Riley, Tom
Subject: RE: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Hi Sue,

I'm sure you will agree that this is one of those issues that will be
discussed at the PHC.  Since the UDCs have been ordered to verify that DA
customers entered into contracts by the 9/20/01 suspension date, SCE is
using the 10/5/01 cutoff date to fulfill that requirement. Regarding the
UC/CSU system, they are on the list Enron provided by the 10/5/01 deadline.

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com

                    "Mara, Susan"
                    <Susan.J.Mara@        To:     <Matt.Pagano@sce.com>,
                    enron.com>            <dhuddles@enron.com>
                                          cc:     <ehughes2@enron.com>,
                    11/02/2001            <gyoung2@enron.com>,
                    03:11 PM              <mevans3@enron.com>, "Riley, Tom"
                                          <Tom.Riley@enron.com>,
                                          <Diane.Romeyko@sce.com>,
                                          <mday@gmssr.com>,
                                          <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>
                                          Subject:     RE: Pending DASR's for
                                          Existing Enron Customers

Matt,

I thought I'd respond for Diann.  The decision is pretty clear on this.
As you recall, the issue was raised by UC/CSU who specifically mentioned
that the utilities were unilaterally setting deadlines for submission of
customer names and DASRs. Let me quote:

Section F, p. 19:

"In its rehearing application, UC/CSU seek clarification on whether
D.01-09-060's prohibition of any new contracts for direct access
services after September 20, 2001, allows or requires utilities to
refuse to process DASRs for an account under a pre-September 20
contract."

p.20:

"We reaffirm that for the time being, and unless the Commission states
otherwise in a subsequent decision, utilities are required to process
DASRs relating to contracts or agreements that were executed on or
before September 20, 2001, including DASRs for service to new facilities
or accounts if the underlying contract pursuant to which those DASRs are
submitted allowed for the provision of that additional service."

p.21

"For purpose of utility compliance with D.01-09-060, we want to make it
clear that, unless otherwise directed or allowed to in a subsequent
Commission decision, utilities cannot set a deadline after which they
could refuse to process DASRs relating to contracts excuted on or before
September 20, 2001."

Matt, these are just the highlights.  The Decision has more language
providing additional clarity.  By the way, this decision was mailed on
October 12 -- after your October 5 deadline. I think the Decision is
crystal clear.  You must accept all DASRs for contracts signed on or
before September 20 and you cannot set artificial deadlines after which
you will not accept those DASRs.

So, given the above.  Can you please explain your position?

Regarding the Novemver 1 date -- you may remember the Rule 22 meeting
held by the utilities, ESPs and customers in eaarly October.  The ESPs
agreed to make a good faith effort to provide a complete customer list
by November 1, with the understanding that additional names and
facilities could be added later with some verification process to ensure
the DA contract was signed on or before September 20.  We agreed to do
this to help the utilities meet their obligations under D. 01-09-060.
Enron has met that commitment.

Sue Mara
(415) 782-7802

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Pagano@sce.com [mailto:Matt.Pagano@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:29 PM
To: dhuddles@enron.com
Cc: ehughes2@enron.com; gyoung2@enron.com; mevans3@enron.com; Mara,
Susan; Riley, Tony; Diane.Romeyko@sce.com
Subject: Re: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Hi Diann,

It seems there is a bit of confusion.  I agree with you that there is no
longer a DASR submittal deadline in accordance with decision D
01-10-036.
However, SCE will only accept DASRs for those customers on the certified
list Enron provided by the 10/5/2001 deadline (see previous emails
supplied
below).  I'm not sure, but perhaps the 11/1 date you are referencing is
in
the Advice Letter filed jointly by PG&E and SDG&E?

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com

                    dhuddles@enro

                    n.com                To:     Matt.Pagano@sce.com

                                         cc:     ehughes2@enron.com,

                    11/02/2001           gyoung2@enron.com,
mevans3@enron.com,
                    01:49 PM             TRiley@enron.com,

                                         Susan.J.Mara@enron.com

                                         Subject:     Re: Pending DASR's
for
                                         Existing Enron Customers

Matt, neither Enron nor the Commission agreed with SCE's arbitrary date.
Further, SCE's approach is in violation of the CPUC's decision on
rehearing
(D 01-10-036), which requires SCE to continue to accept DASRs as long as
the respective contract is signed on or before 9-20-01.

Therefore, Enron reserves the right to continue DASRing accounts for
eligible contracts until the CPUC directs otherwise.

Thanks.

Matt.Pagano@sce.com on 11/02/2001 02:39:09 PM

To:   dhuddles@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Diann,

I received your attached customer list dated 11/1/01, however, per the
attached note sent to you on 10/03/01, SCE's deadline to submit a
certified
customer list was 10/5/2001. SCE will use the list you submitted on
10/5/01
@ 3:58pm (attached below) as your certified list.

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)

Thanks,

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com
----- Forwarded by Matt Pagano/SCE/EIX on 11/02/2001 12:15 PM -----

                    Sheila Advani
                                         To:
                    10/03/2001           cc:
                    03:43 PM             Subject:     Updated Direct
Access
                                         Suspension Information -
IMPORTANT
                                         PLEASE READ NOW

As a result of input from the Rule 22 Working Group meeting held
yesterday,
October 2, 2001 in San Francisco, Southern California Edison is
extending
the date by which ESPs should provide the customer list information as
requested in the original SCE communication below.    Please provide a
certified list of customer information not previously submitted to SCE,
as
set forth in the original e-mail below, no later than

     5:00 p.m.Pacific Daylight Savings Time, Friday, October 5,  2001

This list should be sent via e-mail to Sheila Advani at
Sheila.Advani@sce.com.

We have attached the template below to use for your convenience.

(See attached file: DA Cust List Template.xls)

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Manager.

Original SCE Communication Sent on September 21, 2001

Pursuant to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decision
issued yesterday, the right of end-use customers to acquire direct
access
service is suspended as September 20, 2001.  Specifically, the CPUC
order
states:

     "The execution of any new contracts, or entering into, or
verification
of any new arrangements for direct access
             service pursuant to Public Utilities Code Sections 366 or
366.5, after September 20, 2001, is prohibited" (Ordering
             Paragraph No. 4).

             and,

            "PG&E, SCE and SDG&E shall not accept any direct access
service
requests [DASRs] for any contracts executed
             or agreements entered into after September 20, 2001."
(Ordering Paragraph No. 7).

In order to comply with the CPUC order please provide Southern
California
Edison with a certified list of your direct access customers that have
written contracts or agreements executed on or before September 20,
2001,
for which DASRs have not yet been submitted.  This list may be subject
to
verification in the future, therefore, please be prepared to produce
evidence of these contracts or agreements upon request. The following
information must be included for each customer on this list for your
DASR
to be eligible for future processing:

Please include the following information for each customer on this list:

     ?    Customer Name
     ?    Service Account Number
     ?    Service Address
     ?    Contract Date

This list should be sent via e-mail to Sheila Advani at
Sheila.Advani@sce.com, no later than
     5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Savings Time, Monday, September 24, 2001

For those direct access customers that have certified contracts or
verified
agreements executed on or before September 20, 2001, ESPs must submit
the
respective "connect" Direct Access Service Requests (DASRs) within 30
calendar days following the effective date of the order.  All "connect"
DASRs submitted for accounts, which are not on the ESP's certified list,
will be rejected or canceled.  SCE will not process any "connect" DASRs
after 5:00 p.m., October 20, 2001.  SCE will continue to accept
"disconnect" and "update" DASRs (for changes to billing and/or metering
options) for existing Direct Access customers.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Manager.

Sheila Advani
e:mail: Sheila.Advani@sce.com
Electronic Communications Coordinator
Southern California Edison -ESP Services
Westminster
(714)895-0240 or PAX 54240
Fax: (714)895-0347

                    dhuddles@enro
                    n.com                To:     matt.pagano@sce.com
                                         cc:
                    11/01/2001           Subject:     Pending DASR's for
                    03:01 PM             Existing Enron Customers

Matt, let me know if you have any questions about the data contained in
this file.  thanks!

(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)
(See attached file: DA Cust List Template.xls)
(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)(See attached file: DA Cust List
Template.xls)(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 08:53 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/05/2000 09:33 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "MBD" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Draft Proposal to CPUC

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing a limited quantity of specified information on a timely basis.  We
believe that the limited production we propose will enable the Commission to
commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange
of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by
cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities
have not waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever
and that any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or
other responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the
future, if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents
that are protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work
product privileges.

 [SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION:  Generally speaking, the documents and
information that the Commission seeks can be found, if they exist, within
EPMI, EES and Portland General.  To the extent that EEMC or EESO are
relevant to the Commission's investigation, any documents would be located
within EES.  Thus, we do not anticipate specific document productions from
either EEMC or EESO.]

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can
provide it.  With respect to the other entities, to the extent that
corporate histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate
producing these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic Transaction Documents for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered which includes economic data.   It is
intended that this economic data will provide the Commission with financial
information regarding the Enron Entities which will be useful to its
investigation.   We anticipate producing public filings regarding financial
data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic Transaction Documents in the
second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are limited in number and there will probably be limited
documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent they act as a
scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell generation
output, do not have the specific documents that pertain to each generation
unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General, do have
documents and information for Enron Wind, Saguaro and Las Vegas
Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
document productions.

  For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about one
half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  In addition, those
transactions which do involve Portland General sales into California are
limited to sales to the ISO and PX, and long term contracts with two small
California municipal utilities.  Thus, the Commission will receive the
essential transactional information regarding these sales from the ISO and
PX.  Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000
electronic Transaction Documents in summary form similar to the data being
provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant.  [We propose that
the Commission defer requesting production of other information until it has
reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant proportion of
their energy into the California market.  At that time a more accurate
assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will be valuable
given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the California
wholesale market.]

[Alternate ending to paragraph:   We propose for the voluminous Portland
General generating cost and maintenance data, that these documents be made
available in Portland for inspection from a representative sampling of
facilities.  If there are specific documents that the Commission would like
copied from that production, we can discuss the arrangements for producing
these documents.  We propose to make these documents available in Portland
in a third wave of document productions]

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of transaction data
for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty,
quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is a purchase or a
sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this information, it is
possible that some entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those
transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
business.  EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more
limited role in the wholesale markets which are the subject of the
Commission investigation.  However, EES can also provide similar electronic
Transaction Data with the proviso that it will not include the specific
names of its retail customers but instead will provide a blind customer
number.  This additional restriction is important to EES because many of
EES's customers have agreements whereby they must be notified of any
subpoena and provided an opportunity to object.  EES cannot meet your time
frame to release information and give its customers the notice they require.
Given that EES was a retail provider and the fact that the identity of
retail customers is of little or no relevance to the functioning of the
wholesale market, we do not believe protecting the identity of retail
customers is an unreasonable limitation or narrowing of the request.  We
anticipate producing the transaction data in the second wave of document
productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition, if, at the
request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the Commission or a
court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests for production be
limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities reserve the right to
limit the production of documents in conformance with such order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 05:29
PM ---------------------------

Shari Mao
05/12/2000 04:42 PM
To: Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Presentation

I've changed the Deal Flow Page to include additional headcount and the
Support Structure Summary Page to include costs.  Let me know if you need
additional changes!

Thanks,
Shari
3-3859


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042023.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred: -700.00 / Final: -699.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Laura:

Am I correct in understanding that Xuma signed the EBS form without
modification?  If that is the case, we should prepare the NDA with Enron Net
Works LLC as the party in lieu of EBS and have Xuma execute the revised
agreement.  In the future, we need to use the Net Works form of NDA; however,
since the EBS form has already been sent to and accepted by the Counterparty,
I'm okay using this form.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen

	Laura Howenstine@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/23/2000 10:23 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Tana/Leslie,

Attached is the NDA that we used with Xuma.  They've signed it in hard copy
and sent it back to me, but since then our group has switched from EBS to Net
Works.  Please advise as to how you need to modify this.

Thanks,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 10/23/00 10:07 AM
-----

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 03:44 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Here is the NDA for XUMA.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/12/00 02:48 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: one more NDA

Thanks, Robin.  I actually have another NDA to ask you for and it's a last
minute request for a meeting that I'm attending tomorrow in San Francisco
(for which I'm leaving in an hour or so).

The counter party is a company called XUMA.  The relevant info is below.
Thanks and I'll follow the same procedure as with onexchange.

Regards,
Laura

NDA needed for:
XUMA
160 Pine Street - #200
San Francisco, CA 94111

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 12:37 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Here is the NDA.  Please select the "Read Only" option in order to open and
print.  Please print 2 originals for signature so each party has an original
executed NDA, or you may e-mail it to them as long as they follow up with 2
originals.  After the other party executes it, you will need to get an EBS
attorney to initial it before an EBS VP or above can execute it on our
behalf.  If you have any questions please call me and please make sure I get
an executed original back.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/11/00 04:31 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Robin,

The information that you require for the NDA is in the message below.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 04:33 PM
-----

	ed@onexchange.com
	09/11/00 02:17 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Laura,

Here's all the info:

Ed Cuoco
onExchange
Reservoir Place
1601 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02451
781.672.3400  x223
781.672.3408  fax
www.onexchange.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Laura_Howenstine@enron.net [mailto:Laura_Howenstine@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Ed Cuoco
Subject: NDA

Ed,

I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I have not been able to pull up your
street address on your web site - I get a message that the server is busy.
If
you send me the relevant info on Onexchange, as requested below, I'll send
it on
to our legal department to expedite the NDA.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

Laura Howenstine
Manager, Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0308 (office)
713-304-7819 (mobile)
laura_howenstine@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 01:59
PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Robin Hill   |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          12:24 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     NDA
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Laura, please send me the full legal name and address of the company and I
will
draft the NDA for you to forward to the client.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net


Ina,

 Where can we put Barry T.?

Phillip

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
02:32 PM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz
11/13/2000 08:06 AM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Employee on 32

I will be relocating to 32 effective Dec. 4.  Can you have me set up with all
the required equipment including, PC ( 2 Flat screens), Telephone, and cell
phone. Talk to Phillip regarding where to set my seat up for right now.

Thanks in advance. .

Barry

If there are any questions... Give me a call.  ( 403-) 245-3340.


Rick:

One new projects have been added tot he list of hot deals for June 1st.
They--and their suggested action times--are as follows:

  Project  Originator  Description
EWS
  Midway   Dave Duran  Investment in Peaking capacity in Florida ($277
million).
Suggested Action Item: Communicate with SMontovano, and Marchris findings,
and compile GA comments for RAC if any.  It is not clear at this stage
whether this project shall replace Ft. Pierce which also aims at acquiring
peaking capacity in Florida (same originator).

Of course, please let me know if you have any question.

Brgrds

AI


I'll join you and I'll be bringing my friend charlie.

mike

>From: James Sharkey <j-sharkey@kellogg.nwu.edu>
>To: ddomenighini@etrade.com, Cameron Johnson <Cameron.Johnson@WREI.com>,
>     tcalton@precastcorp.com, mikestubbe@hotmail.com, rick@osubeavers.com,
>       andrew Beattie <Andrew.Beattie@wfsg.com>, mark.guzman@enron.com
>Subject: Saturday Night
>Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:34:51 -0600
>
>Hey guys, I'm getting into PDX on Saturday afternoon and Stacie & I wanted
>to know if any of you were available to do anything Saturday night.  I
>realize the 23rd is very close to XMAS and there is a high probability of
>respective family events.  Regardless, if you are free, Stacie & I are
>going to hit the town and would love to hang.  Obviously significant
>others, or anybody else is welcome.  This ain't no restricted affair (So
>Stubbe you are allowed to bring your gay lover!!!!).  See ya...
>
>Shark
>
>P.S. We can save the Dolphin outing for another night.
>
>James Sharkey
>Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.  USA
>j-sharkey@kellogg.nwu.edu
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Seems that we could provide Lay/Skilling with the power point slides as prep
for any calls.  As a starter, it would be useful to provide McNeally with a
letter that he could send to federal and state decision makers.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	10/06/2000 06:47 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Jeff --

Let's see if we can get material to Lay or Skilling to call McNeally this
week (Oct 9) so that we ask if they'll talk with Rebecca by Oct 15.  What
exactly do we need to give to Lay or Skilling before the call?  What will
Enron send to McNeally if he agrees?  Do we have all of this?

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	10/06/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Agree completely.  Notion I had was that we give Rebecca the slides, tell her
the story on background, then she trots off to interview McNeally, Ellison,
etc.  Just a thought.  Might be easier, faster channel that achieves the
quick action/message we're looking for.

	James D Steffes
	10/05/2000 08:30 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

I don't disagree with Jeff that the WSJ would be a great message point.  I
would recommend, however, that one of Enron's allies interview for the
story.  For Enron to speak for the hi-tech industry is a bit questionable.
Better if we can approach Intel or Sun now and ask them to talk with R. Smith.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/05/2000 04:55 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rebecca Smith

FYI.  Rebecca got back in touch wanting to talk about the history of dereg in
California.  Been trading messages.  When she gets back to me with what she
wants to discuss, I'll check back in before having the conversation.
Question:  What about giving her a copy of our high tech slides with the
intent of getting her to do a story on it?  She might be a good "carrier."
Thoughts?  One story has already hit the SJ Mercury News.

Best,
Jeff


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
AHMAD, ANJAM                    DALE SURBEY                     May 22, 2000
CARSON, MARGARET M              JAMES D STEFFES                 May 26, 2000
CARSON, RICHARD L               RICHARD B BUY                   May 22, 2000
CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J             WINCENTY J. KAMINSKI            May 24, 2000
GANJOO, SHALESH                 PEYTON S GIBNER                 Jun 15, 2000
GHOSH, SOMA                     TIMOTHY DAVIES                  May 31, 2000
KAMINSKI, WINCENTY J.           DAVID W DELAINEY                Jun 05, 2000
OVERDYKE, JERE C.               DAVID W DELAINEY                Jun 12, 2000
PEYTON, JOHN A                  RANDAL T MAFFETT                Jun 05, 2000
ROTENBERG, DOUGLAS M.           DAVID L. HAUG                   Jun 15, 2000


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/19/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,326
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,799
Total Life to Date Transactions	369,832

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/19/00
Enron North America	74%
Enron Europe Limited	36%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	33%
Enron Metals	10%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,719,144,474
MTD	27,834,820,973
LTD	196,527,055,244
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,905,197,410

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	13,796,439,827

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	524
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,215
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,718
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,547


Happy Birthday old man.  I am not sure if my voice mail will make it to you(I
got some weird instructions), so I thought I would cover my bases.  I have
been real busy at work and did not mail your gift until Friday.  It will be a
few days late - sorry.  Hope you enjoyed your bachelor time this weekend.
Can't beat peace and quiet.  Talk to you soon.
PL


Here is the New Date Bucket format that we need for your mini-benches for the
Benchmark(not the Lavo Bench) for July.

1. July
2. Aug. Index
3. August
4. Sept
5. Oct
6. Nov
7. Dec
8. Jan '01
9. Feb '01-Dec '01
10. Jan '02 - Dec '02
11. Jan-Dec '03
12. Jan-Dec '04
13. Jan '05-Dec '10
14. Jan '11-Dec'15
15. Jan '16-Oct '23

If you have any question give me a call.

Thanks,
Robin
x57478


See the list below identifying persons in Global Finance Legal.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 12:55 PM -----

	Darlene C Forsyth
	10/26/2000 11:47 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: EGF Legal Employee List


Attached is the Aquila/ENA weather HDD confirmation. A couple of points to
note.

The Aquila company listed on the Confirmation is the one having an ISDA with
Enron. I'm not sure if ENA is the Enron counterparty.
If we elect we can put a specific payment date in or just leave it to as 20
Business Days after the Floating Amount is detetmined.
If there is an Aquila/ENA ISDA then that should be referenced  in Paragraph 1.

Will you pass it on


The Agreements will be ready first thing in the morning for signatures.
Final edits are being completed by Bear Stearns; all the negotiating is done.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


I got a bill in the mail for an annual IRA fee.  Can I just transfer from my
CMA?

DG


Good job!!!!!!!!...........Sorry, about getting you some of the other prices you needed.  I have been having problems with my email, but I think its been Finally fixed.  Let me know if you need any thing today.

Regards,

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Greg
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Mckay, Jonathan
Cc: Luc, Albert; Bruce, Chad; Grier, Scott; Dalgleish, Randel
Subject: Haul-All Gas Deal

Jon, this deal is signed.  Please buy gas.  thank you gmann
Greg Mann
Sales Manager
(403) 663-2817
fax: (403) 663-2899
greg.mann@enron.com <mailto:greg.mann@enron.com>