Mark,

For your views/thoughts...

Thanks

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 02/06/99 11:09
---------------------------

Elena Kapralova
02/06/99 11:03
To: David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: GTCs Related Issues

Clifford Chance prepared a first draft of GTCs for UK traded commodities.
There are couple general issues emerged from our discussion today that are
relevant to all commodities:

1. Drafted GTC state that "the transaction shall be deemed executed at the
time that Enron sends electronic  message of acceptance" later referred as
Electronic Confirmation to the counterparty and "the parties may also
complete a written confirmation". "But in the event of any conflict Enron's
electronic records or paper copies" of them  shall prevail.

The question (David? Louise?)  is whether it makes sense to continue sending
written confirmations in this case? I know that the current business
processes assume that deals done Online, after they hit the Books, are
processed in the exactly same manner as deals done over the phone. However,
in case of the online trades when one paper record already exists, additional
written confirmation may be redundant.(?)

2. As it was decided not to modify Masters on a client by client basis, the
text on the screen asking to accept GTCs as well as electronically generated
Confirmation text should say that  the customer accepts that this transaction
is governed by GTC (available onlie) unless there is a Master Agreement in
place.

regards,
ek


I think Mike should sign

Peter Styles@ECT
04/20/2001 04:57 AM
To: Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Bauer/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Catherine McKalip-Thompson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Jacobson/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: DRAFT response to Greenpeace Kyoto letter

Jeff: Following our conference call yesterday, Nailia and I will send you a
European Government Affairs mark-up later today. We'll try to incorporate any
views expressed by Paul Hennemeyer and Doug Wood too.

Jeffrey Keeler@ENRON
19/04/2001 22:00
To: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Bauer/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Catherine McKalip-Thompson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Jacobson/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: DRAFT response to Greenpeace Kyoto letter

Attached is a first draft of a response to Greenpeace's April 5 letter to
Jeff Skilling asking for Enron's answers to some specific questions on the
Kyoto Protocol and climate change.   Similar letters were delivered by
Greenpeace Europe in native languages to Enron's offices in the UK,
Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium.

I have attached a copy of one of the letters below.  All the questions are
the same in each.

I have drafted a response with the goals of:

1)  Being responsive to Greenpeace without being defensive or without
"greenwashing."   We have an already-published public "statement" on climate
change and a very positive, solution-oriented story to tell, with many facts
and accomplishments to back up our statements.   I think our letter can land
in the stack that they consider "positive" responses, and not in the stack of
non-responses or "we don't care" responses.

2)  Steering away from directly answering the no-win questions about "Kyoto."
  I think we can respond to the letter in a way that provides meaningful
answers to the general themes of the letter.   I have discussed this with
many of you already, but I strongly feel that we should not get dragged down
into debates over what we like/dislike, support/oppose about Kyoto....we'll
quickly get into questions we can't now answer, and may never be able to
answer.   I'd prefer it if we rise above the politics of the issue and look
solution-oriented by saying counties and companies should continue to be
engaged in this important issue.

3)  Developing corporate-wide messages that we can use in multiple
applications -- arming our PR and govt. affairs advocates with a tight script
to use in their efforts; responding to shareholder inquiries and annual
meeting Q&A;  Ken Lay or other executive speeches and presentations;
something for our Corporate Responsibility annual report.

Sorry for the long preamble, but climate change has become a very sensitive
issue of late, and our message/strategy needs to be very coordinated and we
need to have one clear set of statements that everyone in the company can
understand and use.  With that said, I also believe that these messages
should be used very carefully, as the subject matter is complex and straying
too far from the basics can be dangerous.  We should designate one or two
clear spokespeople that can answer any follow up to the Greenpeace letter by
press or policymakers, and really stick to the boundaries of what's in our
response letter.

There is also the issue of customizing responses from the European offices,
using this letter as a template and adding a few examples of Enron good deeds
in the local areas.   I am not opposed to doing so, but would again
appreciate being able to review these responses before they go.  Please let
me know if you have other views.

I would like to send our response by early next week, maybe even Monday 4/23
if we can turn it around that fast.  Thank you for your input and assistance
and I look forward to your reply.

Jeff

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


The lenders would like a list of the potential producers in Bolivia for
Cuiaba I and if info is available on their holdings please provide that as
well.  Can we also give the details of the Vintage transaction as an example
of our capabilities?   If their consent is required can you obtain?

KFW is ok on relying solely on the back-up fuel supply support but OPIC is
not there yet.

Also, KFW is offering to allow us to go back to floating on interest rate.
They will provide the cost within the next 24 hours, but they have indicated
that it will be significantly less than US$250,000 for a current estimated
annual savings of 60 bps.  This sounds like a good move to me.


Gosh, my memory is short!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Jeff Nogid
	01/23/2001 03:57 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Credit Suisse First Boston ("CSFB")

Sara-

I have left a message with Steven Haratunian asking him for a legal contact
and their deal numbers for our 2 equity forwards.  I will pass them on as
soon as I hear from CSFB.

Jeff Nogid
Enron Global Finance
713-853-4782

	Sara Shackleton
	01/23/01 03:52 PM

		 To: Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Credit Suisse First Boston ("CSFB")

Clint/Jeff:

ENA has an ISDA master agreement with an affiliate of CSFB (but not CSFB).
Can you provide me with the name of a CSFB lawyer so that I can send over a
form of ISDA Master Agreement with Enron Corp.?  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Ben,

This version of the SPA is revised pursuant to our conversation this morning
and is redlined against the version submitted to ENA by Steve Hase last
week.  Feel free to call me with further comments.  Best regards.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

>>> <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com> 05/01/01 07:26PM >>>

I did not get your revision to Hase's draft. Please resend. Thanks.

"Aaron Roffwarg" <aroffwarg@bracepatt.com> on 05/01/2001 06:49:19 PM

To:   <ben.jacoby@enron.com>, <stuart.zisman@enron.com>
cc:   <Chris.Booth@enron.com>, <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
Subject:  Greystone/Haywood - Extension of Dates

Ben and Stuart,

Attached is Amendment #2 to the SPA reflecting the business terms Ben and I
discussed this afternoon.  As you will see this structure (with the
promissory note) is different from the structure described by Steve Hase in
the attached email.  Please let me know if the deal has evolved since our
latest discussions.  Please note that this is being sent to ENA only.
Please call me with your comments at your earliest convenience.  Best
regards.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com      by bracepatt.com; Tue, 01 May 2001
15:29:24 -0500
Received: FROM aesc.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Tue May 01 15:40:09 2001
-0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from 207.92.93.17 ([207.92.93.2]) by aesc.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1);      Tue, 1 May 2001 16:22:53 -0400
Message-id: <fc.000f749c00763c4c3b9aca0044810ab2.763dd3@aesc.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:32:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Greystone/Haywood - Extension of Dates
To: ALouison@hunton.com
Cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com, stuart.zisman@enron.com, aroffwarg@bracepatt.com,
prollin@aesc.com, mbarr@hunton.com
From: "Steve Hase" <shase@aesc.com>
References: <11A113B59DF4D311A0DE00805FA7F323028FC4E6@DCMAIL1>
In-Reply-To: <11A113B59DF4D311A0DE00805FA7F323028FC4E6@DCMAIL1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-Path: shase@aesc.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2001 20:22:53.0236 (UTC) FILETIME
=[800B0F40:01C0D27C]

Audrey,

Ben and I have reached an agreement which will be documented as follows:

1)  Extension of Dates -- May  11 becomes May 9 (Wed)

2)  Ben will edit the latest version of the Amendment #2 so that

a) on Aug 1, we pay the greater of the $1.5MM ($2.5 less $1 paid at
exercise) and the Additional Compensation (less the $1 MM)

b)  a separate agreement whereby Corp guarantees the payment on Aug 1.

The intention is to sign the Amendment #3 before 5/9.

Thanks everyone for making this happen.

Steve Hase

(See attached file: #1283523 v5 - AMENDMENT NO 2 TO SPA.doc)

 - Red Am2 to SPA.doc


Tom Moran has approved the suggestion directly below regarding customer
profiles for uploading.

Please let me know if you agree.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 04:46 PM
---------------------------

From:  Lisa Lees
10/24/2000 03:15 PM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: US Gas Phy Index approval required

Shall we copy customer profiles for US Gas Phy Index Fwd Firm non-TX >1Mo<
1Yr.

Need to know by end of day today.

Thanks again.  LL
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 03:07 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  10/19/2000 05:47 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne
Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Gas Phy Index approval required

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

Trader:  Tori Kuykendall
EXAMPLE:

US Gas Phy Index

US Gas Phy Index Fwd Firm non-TX >1Mo<1Yr (RESTRICTED)

US Gas Phy Index       IF EPSJ Blanco Avg           Oct00-Dec00         USD/MM

A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The volumes
scheduled to be delivered are subject to reductions due to normal operational
constraints on the El Paso Natural Gas Pipeline. The reductions caused by
these constraints are excused nonperformance and are not considered a failure
to receive or deliver firm gas. The Contract Price shall be derived from the
Index, as adjusted by the price submitted by Counterparty via the website.
The Period of Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the
Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Oct 2000
to the Termination Date of 31 Oct 2000.
The transaction is for delivery at El Paso San Juan Blanco non-Bondad.
The Index for a month shall be the El Paso Natural Gas Co. - San Juan Basin
price as listed in the section entitled "Prices of Spot Gas Delivered to
Pipelines", published in the first issue in such month of Inside Ferc's Gas
Market Report.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.

==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986


Please review the home addresss and phone number shown on this eMail.  DO NOT RESPOND if the information is correct.  However, if incorrect then reply to this eMail with the correct information so you HR records can be updated accordingly.  Your home information is important in case the Company needs to forward critical materials to you or contact you regarding important Company information.

Address Line 1: 20311 MIMOSA GLEN
Address Line 2:
Address Line 3:
City: SPRING
State: TX
Country: US
Zip: 77388
Phone: 2813556504


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 01:52
PM ---------------------------

	From:  William Kelly                           04/07/2000 01:52 PM

To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Game

I appreciate your inviting the Risk group on this outing.  I understand about
the ticket issue, but the gesture is what counts anyway.

Thanks again.

WK


MArk--I put out a couple of calls to find on the 2002 Governors race in Wyoming, and the feedback I got was similiar to what we talked about.....there has not been a clear candidate yet, and Joe Meyers name is one of three possible Republican contestants. (the other two that are being talked about are Eli Bebout and Ray Hupkins--don't know if I got my spelling right on these boys!).  Apparently there was alot of discussion about the current US Senator, Craig Thomas, wanting to run and so everybody was pretty much waiting until he made up his mind before jumping into the race.  My understanding is that Thomas did make up his mind about 2 weeks ago to stay in the Senate, so your Mr. Meyers may very well be strongly considering a run.


This is something I did 6 months ago to describe the major parts of the
permitting process.

The Storage Permit time cycle is not guaranteed and can be lengthened if
objections from the public are received. We have good relations with the
local area and do not expect objections unless they come from competitors.
The procedure is as follows:
a. Submit application to commission.
b. Department of Natural Resources reviews application. (2-3 days minimum)
c. Public notice issued for public comment. (10 days minimum)
d. Public hearing is conducted.
e. Post hearing public comment period. (1 week minimum period dependent upon
comments received)
f. The commission will review the hearing record and respond to comments. (1
week minimum period dependent upon comments received)
g. Notice is sent to the La. State House and Senate Natural Resources
Committees for comment. They have 2 weeks to respond. If there is any major
public opposition to the application, the legislature committees can be
expected to become involved, otherwise the usual response is "no comment".
h. With no negative responses in item g above, the commission will issue the
permit. (1 day minimum depending upon the availability of the Commissioner
for signature). Interesting note, the commission is not required to abide by
any finding of the legislative committees.


Somehow the "one-part rate" glossary item fell off of TW's list so I've
revised it again.


Here's the path to the California prices sheet:

P:Trading/California/CAScheduling/Cash/Position/CA/2001/feb2001/Cal Prices

Have fun with that.


--

Subject: Cute story

Anyone who's been single and over the age of 18 can relate to this.

When I was younger I hated going to weddings ...it seemed that all of my

aunts and the grandmotherly types used to come up to me, poking me in the

ribs and cackling, telling me, 'You're next.'

? They stopped that crap after

I started doing the same thing to them at funerals.


LLoyd Will and Kim Melodick have requested your help in identifying what YOU feel it takes to be successful within each functional unit of East Power.  This feedback will be used to create a recruiting, retention and development tool that will assist East Power in identifying the skills and training that are key to your group's success. Please take some time to answer the attached four questions as they relate to your area.  Your participation and cooperation is greatly appreciated.

Sarah Zarkowsky x53791
Ben Brasseaux x58747
Meliza Evanson x57855

Enron North America
Human Resources


Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
11:36 AM ---------------------------

Shauncy Mathews
10/26/2000 10:22 AM
To: Janet Warri/NA/Enron@Enron, Leticia Flores/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elida
Aguilar/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: I Picked you

---------------------- Forwarded by Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

	Elida Aguilar @ ENRON

	10/26/2000 08:48:03 AM

To: bheiman@worldnet.att.net, PFlores@corestaff.com, Lori
Boutte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Albernita Travis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: I Picked you

----- Forwarded by Elida Aguilar/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000 08:46 AM -----

	Rose Rivera@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/26/2000 08:41 AM

		 To: Jan Dunn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Debbie
Lucadou/HOU/EES@EES, Denissa Arredondo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elida
Aguilar/Corp/Enron@ECT, acontreras@appleorthodontix.com, Amanda
Camacho/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica
Quintana/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: I Picked you

----- Forwarded by Rose Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/26/2000 08:40 AM -----

	Irma Fuentes@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 08:35 AM

		 To: Rose Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frances
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cynthia U
Espinoza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patricia
Moreno-EECC/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, G G Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: I Picked you

I picked YOU!!!   Has nothing to do that you are all my only friends!!!!
Really.
----- Forwarded by Irma Fuentes/Enron Communications on 10/26/00 08:32 AM
-----

	G G Garcia@ENRON
	10/26/00 07:58 AM

		 To: Belinda Trevino/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Irma Fuentes@ENRON
COMMUNICATIONS, Debbie Lucadou/HOU/EES@EES, Irma Rodriguez/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bonnie Allen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: I Picked you

> -----Original Message-----
>
>   > "I Picked You"
> >  > My instructions were to send this to four people that I wanted God
to
> >  > bless and I picked you.
> >  >
> >  > Please pass this to four people you want to be blessed as well as
the
> >  > person who sent it to you. This prayer is powerful and there is
> >  > nothing attached, please do not  break this pattern; prayer is one
of
> =
> >  the
> >  > best gifts we receive. There is no cost but a lot of rewards, let's
> >  > continue
> >  > to pray for one another.   God bless and  have a nice day!
> >  >
> >  > "Father, I ask you to bless my friends, relatives and e-mail buddies
> >  > reading this right now.  Show them a new revelation of your love and
> >  > power.  Holy Spirit, I ask you to minister to their spirit at this
> very
> >  > moment.  Where there is pain, give them your peace and mercy.  Where
> >  > there is self-doubt, release a renewed confidence through your
grace,
> >  > In Jesus precious Name." Amen >>
>
>


Randy, your proposal is fine by me.  Jim


President Bush's statement on 201.

	Larry Decker
	06/05/2001 04:37 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: POTUS Statement re: 201

President's Statement Regarding a Multilateral Initiative On Steel

WASHINGTON, June 5 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following was released today by the
White House:

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

This Administration is committed to free trade as an engine of growth. As
part of our free trade agenda, we are committed to ensuring that American
industry and American workers can compete on a level playing field. That is
why, today, I am announcing my intent to launch an initiative to respond to
the challenges facing the U.S. steel industry. This initiative will be
designed to restore market forces to world steel markets and eliminate the
practices that harm our steel industry and its workers.

The U.S. steel industry has been affected by a 50-year legacy of foreign
government intervention in the market and direct financial support of their
steel industries. The result has been significant excess capacity,
inefficient production, and a glut of steel on world markets.

My decision to pursue this initiative comes after extensive consultations by
Members of the Cabinet with our industry, our steelworkers, and interested
Members of Congress. We have discussed the challenges facing U.S. steel
manufacturers, and we understand that we have a critical stake in a healthy
U.S. steel industry.

Thus, I intend to take the following steps. First, I am directing the United
States Trade Representative, in cooperation with the Secretary of Commerce
and Secretary of the Treasury, to initiate negotiations with our trading
partners seeking the near-term elimination of inefficient excess capacity in
the steel industry worldwide, in a manner consistent with applicable U.S.
laws.

Second, I am directing the U.S. Trade Representative, together with the
Secretaries of Commerce and the Treasury, to initiate negotiations on the
rules that will govern steel trade in the future and eliminate the underlying
market-distorting subsidies that led to the current conditions in the first
place. Absent strict disciplines barring government support, direct or
indirect, for inefficient steel-making capacity, the problems confronting the
U.S. steel industry and the steel industry worldwide will only recur.

We see these negotiations and the goal of restoring market forces as being in
our interest and in the interest of our trading partners and their steel
industries. That is why we would like to work cooperatively with our trading
partners in pursuing this initiative.

Third, I am directing the U.S. Trade Representative to request the initiation
of an investigation of injury to the United States industry by the
International Trade Commission under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974.
This action is consistent with our WTO obligations.

This three-part strategy, coupled with further restructuring of the U.S.
industry, should help the industry meet the challenges it faces. I look
forward to working together with the industry, the steelworkers, Congress,
and our international trading partners in support of this important
initiative.

Contact: White House Press Office, 202-456-2580


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz@ENRON
02/12/2001 11:49 AM
To: Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA - West Gas Orig

Edie, Darren, further to our conversation.  The only reporting that I would
like to send upstairs is broken down into two categories.  West Gas Trading,
and West Gas Origination.  All orig ( even Denver ) is coded to 107321.
Inside of west gas orig we have created a tracking mechanism through Darren,
that provides a seperate report broken down by individual or group but I am
the only person who needs this data for right now.

Edie, please ensure that on a go forward basis that the actualized income
streams have been coded in the proper places and that we do not double count
again.

Call if any questions.

BT


Help me to understand.....if electricity is an "essential use" to a customer,
shouldn't they be on a firm schedule?  Can we take our firm customers and put
them on an interruptible tariff and claim "essential use" everytime the ISO
calls a curtailment.  Hmmmm.   Sounds like the I-6 to me.

Susan J Mara@ENRON
12/05/2000 07:02 PM
To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Interruptible Programs OII

i have the sense that our customers may not like this.  Any thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 04:58 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	12/05/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Interruptible Programs OII

Yesterday, a number of parties to the Interruptible OII c.00-10-002) filed
their proposals for what changes should be made to the utilities'
interruptible programs.  A summary of those filings will be distributed later
this week.  In addition the Energy Producers and Users Coalition filed an
emergency motion yesterday to make certain "refinements" to the utilities'
programs.

Specifically, the motion requests that the Commission:

1. Order Edison and PG&E to implement Optional Binding Mandatory Curtailment
(OBMC) programs for all distribution level customers.  The OBMC should
provide flexible program criteria, recognizing that not all customers have
the same operational capability to control the manner and extent of
curtailment as envisioned by the Commission in directing the implementation
of mandatory curtailment plans in D.91548;

2. Establish clear procedures by which customers who are not operationally
suited to participate in the OBMC but who face some level of increased
environmental damage, health or safety risk upon sudden curtailment may
qualify under the "Essential Use" category of customers; and

3. Approve a new service alternative for customers that would experience a
disproportionate business interruption and economic impact upon interruption.

Let me know if you want to see a copy of the motion.

Dan


Hi Scott,

I have these questions:

What do we mean by configuration?  We are telling them that we will give them
the configuration by date x, but I'm not sure what we mean.

What was decided on spare parts, if anything?

I know it is repetitive, but could you email me a basic timeline of what you
see as the key dates for site designation, shipping, anything else you can
think of?  I've started a timeline but would like to cross check.

I was hoping to have it done before noon, but the 930 conference call will
impact that.  I have a meeting this afternoon from 230 until 500 or so, so
I'm trying to get done before then.

Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/02/2000 07:32 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: P.O.

When you have the draft P.O. done, I would like to block of some time to
discuss it.  I will leave my schedule fairly open today.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Strategic Management Society" <sms@mgmt.purdue.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Strategic+20Management+20Society+22+20+3Csms+40mgmt+2Epurdue+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Reynolds, Connie
Subject:	Affiliation Update/Changes for San Francisco Conference Program

Dear San Francisco Authors,

Please check the SMS Web site for your listing in the conference
program.  If we have inaccurately listed your name and affiliation,
please send the corrected information, plus new contact information if
you've moved, to the SMS Executive Office.

Also, please note the date and time of your presentation(s)...

The change must be received in the SMS Executive Office no later than
Monday, August 27, 2001.

Thank you...

SMS Executive Office
1310 Krannert Center
Purdue University
W Lafayette IN 47907-1310
USA
Phone: 765-494-6984
Fax: 765-494-1533
Email: sms@mgmt.purdue.edu
Web site: www.smsweb.org


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=05/22/2001>, published as of 05/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)


To: All
From: Joan Dreskin

For the conference call Monday 12/11/00 here are the call in instructions as
follows:
The Access Number in which you will need to connect to the conference call is
712-271-3842.
The passcode in which you will need to enter when the system prompts you to
is 31311 after entering in the passcode, you will need to push # then you
will need to announce yourself once connected to the conference call.? The
time of the conference call is 2pm - 3:30pm eastern time.

Thank you,
Quadeia Washington
Administrative Assistant for Joan Dreskin

-----Original Message-----
From: Dassistant
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:56 AM
To: Dassistant; 'Stephen R. Melton (E-mail)'; 'Shelley Corman (E-mail)';
'Carl Levander (E-mail)'; 'Richard J. Kruse (E-mail)'; 'Claire A. Burum
(E-mail)'; 'Judy Neason (E-mail)'; 'Daniel F. Collins (E-mail)'; 'Janice
Alperin (E-mail)'; 'Peggy Heeg (E-mail)'; 'David Hendrickson (E-mail)';
'mcmaho1m@kochind.com'
Cc: Joan Dreskin
Subject: RE: privileged and confidential/attorney work product

To: All
From: Joan Dreskin

For the conference call today Thursday 12/07/00 here are the call in
instructions as follows:
The Access Number in which you will need to connect to the conference call is
415-228-4834.
The passcode in which you will need to enter when the system prompts you to
is 57287 after entering in the passcode, you will need to push # then you
will need to announce yourself once connected to the conference call.? The
time of the conference call is 2pm - 3:15pm eastern time.

Thank you,
Quadeia Washington
Administrative Assistant for Joan Dreskin

-----Original Message-----
From: Dassistant
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:43 PM
To: Stephen R. Melton (E-mail); Shelley Corman (E-mail); Carl Levander
(E-mail); Richard J. Kruse (E-mail); Claire A. Burum (E-mail); Judy
Neason (E-mail); Daniel F. Collins (E-mail); Janice Alperin (E-mail);
Peggy Heeg (E-mail); David Hendrickson (E-mail); 'mcmaho1m@kochind.com'
Subject: privileged and confidential/attorney work product
Importance: High

Attached please find a proposal by John Morris to prepare an economic
analysis of pipeline affiliate concentration into specific geographic
destination markets vis-a-vis non-affiliates.? I would like to discuss this
proposal with our group on Thursday afternoon (2:00 est).? I will forward on
call-in instructions tomorrow.? Please be aware that this proposal is
privileged and confidential and was prepared as attorney-client work
product.?? Mr. Morris' information is set forth below.? It may be valuable to
ask Mr. Morris to join us for the conference call in order to answer your
questions.

-
John R. Morris
Vice President
Economists Incorporated
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC? 20036
Voice: 202.223.4700
Fax:?? 202.296.7138


Rick - Linda is tied up with Rick and Mark.  She asked that John and I get with you today so we can get final approval for the transparency language.  Leon with the Committee called us this morning seeking our thoughts.  Give us a ring when you have a chance and then we can follow up with Loiuse.

Thanks - Chris

Attached reflects our efforts to further tighten the language on transparency.


Start project  with Elene for Mark


MJ,

How are you?  It was good to see you when I was out there.  Things here are busy as ever!  I have some guy friends going to napa valley in a couple of weeks and they would like a recommendation for a place to stay.  I know you have stayed in napa before - do you have any recommendations?  I appreciate your travel agency services!!

I hope all is well and to see you soon.

Thanks,

Kim


Too bad. Going back to calgary on the 26th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ryan Fleming" <flemingryan99@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	Re: New Years?

Boarding was a no go as Brad had to bail for work.  I'm going to be in
panorama for new years with the family.  Wont be around much this year for
the holidays, next year will be spent in the 'Deer.  I will be here on the
26-28 of December, will you be around still?

Ryan

>From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
>To: flemingryan99@hotmail.com
>Subject: New Years?
>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:07:18 -0600
>
>Are you guys going to be in the southern part of Alberta for New Year's?
>Any plans? Trying to figure out what everyone is doing. How was boarding?
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Thanks Amy for all your work with us this Summer.....GOOD LUCK w/school!!

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


David,
Can you resend 1/26/00 MPR?  I mistakingly deleted file before all worksheets
were printed.

Thanks,
Patti (Sally's assistant)


Gentlemen -

The MSEB letter below is an unfortunate event.  MSEB is positioning itself to
claim that it owes no money to DPC for approx. 3 months of billings because
it has a mis-declaration claim against DPC.

In our initial review, our lawyers, both in-house and outside counsel,
believe that DPC will prevail on this issue.  We are currently preparing a
more detailed legal analysis.  But it will likely affect DPC's cash flow and
may affect DPC's ability to complete Phase II.

It is also disappointing that MSEB has chosen to start a brawl before the
results of the Review Committee are announced and the parties have the
opportunity to meet to discuss the results.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/01/2001 10:53 AM ---------------------------

Paul Kraske
02/28/2001 08:17 AM
To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Mathis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suhas
Tuljapurkar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: christopher.walker@linklaters.com, jonathan.inman@linklaters.com,
lbrasher@skadden.com

Subject: MSEB letter you wanted scanned

Legal team-
Attached is a copy of the letter delivered to us earlier tonight by MSEB
claiming payment of 400 crores from DPC on account of availability
mis-declarations.  We will likely respond to the letter tomorrow referring
the matter to dispute resolution under the PPA and pulling the MSEB letter of
credit for the amount still outstanding under the December bill.  Feel free
to call me if you have any questions regarding the foregoing or the
attached.  Regards,
Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/28/2001 07:24 PM ---------------------------
From: Mrudula Gadade on 02/28/2001 07:19 PM
To: Paul Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: MSEB letter you wanted scanned

Regards,
Mrudula.


Good news,

My article will be in the Perspectives section of this Sunday's Chicago
Tribune.  The Trib's web site is www.chicagotribune.com.  They left what I
sent them largely intact.  I was especially surprised by that, since they
had said that the article would be 800 words, I gave them more than 1400,
and I believe what's getting published will be just below 1300.

I'm very excited, and deeply grateful to Tom.

Love you all,

Mark

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL Gas Daily


I will be away from the office beginning December 13 and returning on
December 26.  I will occasionally be checking my voicemail box.  If you
need more immediate assistance please call Martin Cominsky at
713-627-3490, ext. 122  or email him at Mcominsky@aol.com.

Thank you, and have a great holiday.

Jeff Sokoloff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


Thanks, Sarah.  Question:  Could we, and should we, attempt to pre-empt the
FERC report and try to get press coverage of the BP paper before FERC
releases the results of its investigation?

	Sarah Novosel
	10/04/2000 11:58 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Investigation on California

This is just a rumor, but we heard on the EPSA call today that Scott Miller
is trying to get his report on the California part of his investigation to
the Commissioners by Friday of this week.

Also, the EPSA/Boston Pacific paper continues to be revised, but EPSA wants
to get it to FERC as soon as possible (but if Scott completes his report by
Friday it may not be in time for Scott's report), so they have asked us to
review the report and Executive Summary and get comments back to them for a
conference call on Friday.  Since we will be at FERC during the EPSA call, we
will need to get any comments we may have to Julie by Thursday evening or
Friday morning.

Thanks everyone.

Sarah

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000
11:06 AM ---------------------------

"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> on 10/04/2000 09:35:45 AM
To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Boston Pacific Statistical Research Project

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Don Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy

DATE: October 4, 2000

RE: Boston Pacific Statistical Research Project

Attached is the latest draft of the full Boston Pacific statistical research
project, reflecting the comments made by EPSA members.  Both clean and
redlined versions are attached.  There are two major changes in the project:
1) the seven-page summary is the Executive Summary of the report; and 2) all
cost estimates for new peakers have been removed.

Please review the documents so we can discuss them on a conference call on
Friday, October 6th at 11:00 a.m. EST and then release it to Scott Miller for
the FERC investigation.  Please dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the Julie
Simon/EPSA call.  If you have any questions or comments, please contact Julie
Simon at 202-789-7200 or jsimon@epsa.org before the Friday call.

Attachments

Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC  20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
jgallagher@epsa.org


FYI.  Here are letters Enron (Steve Kean) sent to US Senators about real
solutions for California.  The Feinstein / Murkowski letters are very good
overviews of our recommendations on what to do and what not to do.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 07:57 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	02/26/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Letters to Senators

Attached are the letters sent to Senators Wyden, Feinstein & Murkowski.


The conference room is located by the kitchen on the 31st floor.  If you have
any questions, please call "Z" at ext. 5-4858.

Thanks!


Please be informed, Steve's  2002 Plan Strategy Meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 9, 10:00 - 11:00a in EB-1336.

Please mark your calendars accordingly.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

(713) 646-2551 Fax


I wanted to advise you that Ken has joined another board - nCUBE, Corp.
nCUBE is in the video on-demand business.  Blockbuster and Enron have entered
into an agreement with nCUBE that it will provide video streaming media
appliances, software applications, technology consulting and design for the
on-demand service.

Rosie


When Mark.Taylor@enron.com sent e-mail to GILBERGD@SULLCROM.COM (10/13/1)
Sullivan & Cromwell has received spam from your domain or e-mail address in
the past. If you need to send e-mail to us
please contact PC Support at (212)558-4277.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.


I was not in the office today.  I just check my emails from home.  I'm taking Matt Fleming to YOUR BBQ place next week.  He hasn't found a job yet.  I told him that it felt like a bunch of us estaters would be let go soon, don't know why, just a feeling.

-----Original Message-----
From: Goodell, Scott
Sent: Wed 1/2/2002 11:36 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Cc:
Subject: RE: New Contracts

are you in the office today?
Luling is by the pound, so my eyes are bigger than my gut.
Try Swinging Door in Richmond, TX.
Are you a Joe's fan in Alvin?

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Goodell, Scott
Subject: RE: New Contracts

Where the heck is Somerset?  And who cares anyway?

I hope you had a happy New Year buddy.  Indrid and I went to Lulling City Market over the weekend.  That is without a doubt the best BBQ I have ever had.    YOU DE MAN!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Goodell, Scott
Sent: Wed 1/2/2002 11:13 AM
To: Anastas, Sherry
Cc: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: New Contracts

To my knowledge, we are not agent for these guys anymore.  I will double check with Germany, but I don't think we should roll into 2002.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Anastas, Sherry
Sent:   Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:06 AM
To:     Goodell, Scott
Subject:        New Contracts

Scott,

In reconciling imbalances with Somerset Gas Transmission Company, LLC, Volume Management has discovered two contracts that were assigned from CES.  If these are valid, we need to load beginning balances as of 12/31/99.

The contracts are as follows:

Contract
Number          Agent for               Type of Service Class           Rate Schedule   Beginning Balance

3005            Dannic Energy Corp      Gathering       Interruptible   I               5,425 mmbtu

3028            Thomas Leeper           Gathering       Interruptible   I               500 mmbtu

I will also need a transport capacity ticket set up.  Please let me know if we should set these contracts up of not.

Thanks,

Sherry Anastas


how'd you get to $189 - had the damn truck for 2 weeks.  I am back three
half days a week

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Cc: 'Eldon Sellers'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @
Berkeley
Subject: Re: did I forget

did i mention that rental fees to use the truck are $67/day?

that aside, our net account is now:

Nancy owes Jeff for Abalone ($67/entree)      =    $149,756.39
Jeff owes Nancy for parking fees ($67/day)    =            $189.00
Nancy owes Jeff                          $149,567.39

Also, thanks a million for the delicious dinner, the very competitive game
of spades, letting me do my laundry, and compelling conversation about
watery/non-watery tomatoes.

Best,
Jeff

You back at work???

Nancy Sellers

<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Jeff Dasovich'"

ndavi.com>                     <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:     "'Eldon Sellers'"
<Eldon@direcpc.com>,
07/17/2001 02:33 PM            "Prentice @ Berkeley"

<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>

Subject:     did I forget

to mention that parking fees are $67 a day?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Hey--

Well, as far as I know, the phone number works! :-)  Talking next week would be fine. I'll be back in Philly as of Sun evening. ie: EST, 2 hours ahead of Denver :-)

I'm not sure if I should be offering my congratulations or not, you failed to mention whether you were one of the 3 who made the final cut... regardless, you sound like you're hanging in there.

I'm sitting in the airport, on my way home and thrilled to be doing so.

Talk to you later!

Steph

  plucci01@talkmatch.com wrote:

Hey,

Thanks for the phone number, I hope it works! It's a little crazy for me this weekend also. Why don't I call you during the first part of next week and see if we can set something up. What time zone will you be in?

As far as the job goes, three in this office made the final cut. So we are waiting around for our next set of orders. I'll explain more later. Take care.

Paul

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
messag! e as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.

  _____

Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your holiday gifts!

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.


Make sure we keep all visitors at a considerable distance from the trading floor.


Yes.
Maureen - please schedule.

From: Michael GrimesCORPENRON/ENRON@EUEnronXGate on 07/06/2001 03:05 AM GDT
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Meeting Request - July 25th

Steve -

I,ll be in Houston July 23-26 and would like to get together to bring you up
to date on the latest developments in Japan regarding EBS and EGM, as well
as; energy markets.; Would you; have half an hour on the morning of Wednesday
the 25th?

Thanks,

Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 11:21 AM
---------------------------
CHRISTY
CHAPMAN
08/16/2000 05:41 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Agenda for East Gas Strategy Meeting

Here you go.  If you have any other questions, please let me know.


Hey,

Forgive my delay in calling you back, but I haven't come up for air today.
I will try to call you later today or tomorrow.

Patti


AGA for 1/19/01 is -90 w/d

Website information:
http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp
Drop down Box to "Storage"
In-house Analysis
My files are the last three files.

When the dialog box asks to upadate links click "NO".


Please note that with the authorization below, interconnection issues with
the attached utility still need to be addressed.  (This includes agreement,
queue, facilities if needed, etc.)  Call us if you need assistance.  Thanks.

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/30/2001 02:20 PM

To: Chris Lackey/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Golden/HOU/EES@EES, Marc
Pana/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Ozzie Pagan/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen A
Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, sscott3@enron.com,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, jader@enron.com,
Michael Brown/Enron@EnronXGate, mark.bernstein@enron.com,
john.llodra@enron.com, janelle.scheuer@enron.com, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Guillaume/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, joe.gordon@enron.com, splauch@enron.com,
jennifer.n.stewart@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com, Posey
Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pearce W Hammond/Enron@EnronXGate, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jason
Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Wheeler/Enron@EnronXGate, Mason
Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com,
david.fairley@enron.com, george.mccormick@enron.com, wjennin@enron.com,
joseph.wagner@enron.com, elizabeth.johnston@enron.com, bill.rust@enron.com,
Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Billy
Braddock/Enron@EnronXGate, steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com,
terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com,
kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com,
patrick.hanse@enron.com, Karla Compean/Enron@EnronXGate, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Thane
Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andy Rodriquez/Enron@EnronXGate,
Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, susan.scott@enron.com, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Easier for EPMI/EES to purchase from industrials

Attached is FERC authorization for EPMI and EES to purchase power from
industrials NATIONWIDE (effective March 6, 2001--Does not expire).  The
industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer license from FERC
(subject to EPMI and EES making certain after the fact quarterlty filings for
the industrials).

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations and used
primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public utilities"
subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at wholesale) can sell
power at wholesale from such facilities to EPMI and EES without prior notice
under section 205 of FPA (would usually require 60 day advance notice
filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff.

West Desk:  This is similar to the authorization that FERC gave last week to
purchases from industrials in WSCC.

____________________________________
On April 27, FERC issued an order granting EPMI and EES the authority to
purchase power from IPPs at market-based rates.  As the attached order
indicates, the effective date of the EPMI and EES rate schedules is March 6,
2001.

 - ER011394.wpd
 - ER011394.doc


As you may have noticed, there was a network error during today's eSpeak with
Dr. Ben Gilad.  Although the questions and answers were not visible during
the second half of the eSpeak session, Dr. Gilad did answer all the questions
he received.  As always, the transcript of the discussion will be available
in the eSpeak archives.

If the technical issue prevented you from asking a question during today's
session, please email your question to Amy Oberg at Enron Energy Services.
Dr. Gilad has generously offered to respond to questions that could not be
submitted during the live event.


Just checking up on you to see how you're feeling.  Are you feeling alright?
How did the last test go?


Darrell and I appreciate Heidi "volunteering" to make another trip to Seoul and we recognize she is going out of her way to assist EGA on this issue.  Darrell felt Heidi earned the trust of the SK accountants during the audit and this would help us receive the additional information we need quickly.   As Beth states below, EGA will go with Heidi and take the ball to make sure all the issues are resolved.

Again, we appreciate Heidi and her extra effort and Beth working with us on this issue.

Sommers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Apollo, Beth
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:15 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Buy, Rick; Beck, Sally
Cc:	Port, David; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Dyson, Fernley
Subject:	Action plan on Seoul Issue from recent Doorstep

We had a conference call this afternoon to discuss the next steps
(Participants:  Beth, Shona, David Port, Jeff Sommers, John Bergren(EAS),  Heidi Mason (person who did Seoul Doorstep from Australia), Darrell Kinder (in charge of the Enron Seoul office and the SK relationship))

The net result of our discussion was that Heidi will be making another trip to Seoul (in 2 weeks) to scope out the deals since the inception of the JV (Jan 99) and to validate that the assumptions that she made in her analysis are correct.  One of Jeff Sommers' people from Houston will accompany her in order to meet some of the people there and take a hand off from Heidi(since she has a day job in Australia)in terms of following up to see that these issues are resolved.

Major Issues to be looked at on round 2:   -- see further detail from Heidi below
1.  Figure out if SK Gas really is intentionally running unprofitable transactions thru the JV with their 100% owned entity SK Global  and quantify(note the $.5mm below is on 		an accrual basis not MTM)
2. Emphasize the need to both the JV and to Enron SK that they need to formalize a trading policy(brought up by AA in the doorstep they did a year ago)
3.  Take a deeper look at their International sales(outside of Seoul) as there are much fewer controls in place; credit issues could be a problem
4.   Propose some regular reporting that should go to the Enron JV people to monitor transations and improve communication

I know Heidi is not thrilled about going back(she had to eat meals with locals who were eating eye balls!)and she is very busy running the Australian operations and back office, but knows that this is an important issue.  Darrell Kinder feels like she will get the best results.    Fernley, just an FYI to you, so that you know she will be heading back there for a few days.

Jeff and I will schedule a seperate download session with the 3 of you for the SK Gas JV once the next trip is complete.

Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mason, Heidi
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:31 AM
To:	Shona Wilson@Enron; Apollo, Beth; Kinder, Darrell; Ford, Allan
Subject:

Preliminary to tomorrow's call I have been talking to Darrell about the additional work that we need to look to do at SK Gas.

At a minimum, the things I believe we need to do are:

Obtain details of the profitability of all affiliated company deals for the period since inception of the JV.  I have received from SK Gas a break-up of the total P+L for 2000 by transaction type. It is the Cargo trading as per below that we are interested in. Overall there appears to be little movement therefore in the net profit for the year to 31/12/2000 v the rolling 12 months we have.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

The data that we have for May 2000 to April 2001 indicates a total loss for trading with SK Global of approx 0.5mn and this is after the inclusion of the one large profit deal that made 0.5mn. Without that deal the loss would have been 1mn dollars versus a profit of 1.8mn on trades with independant counterparties, which is the main reason why we feel we need to further assess these deals further. Regardless of the outcome of the testing however, we need a better process to allow for a current review of these deals either before or when they are done, in line with the JV agreement.

We need to determine from SK Gas, their trading policy, be this written or verbal. There may perhaps be a reason why the deals with SK Global show a more frequent loss if, for example, SK Global take shipments that SK Gas can not sell elsewhere ie a buyer of the last resort? Without knowing the policy it is very hard to come to any clear conclusions as to the trend seen to date.
We need to review the circumstances of some of the larger SK Global deals to try and assess why they were loss making trades. Again, without knowing the trading policy and doing the review so far in arrears, makes it difficult to effectively review all the circumstances of the trade. Therefore, going forward we need to ensure that we implement a policy that ensures SK Corp staff are able to review these trades as they occur when the market factors are more to hand.

I have discussed with Darrell the option of using resources closer to hand to resolve this, but appreciate his comments that due to the sensitive nature of the arrangements, this will be less than ideal. At the same time, I am not available until the week of the 18th, so timing may also be an issue. Allan Ford is not available to come with me, but I do have an additional resource from Australia if required. Again, there may be an option to use someone else from the region, or AAs who we will need as translators anyway.

Happy to get all feedback and ideas on this plan for tomorrow as I want to have the most comprehensive work plan possible in place before we leave to ensure the visit is as efficient as possible.

Thanks

Heidi

****************************************************************************

Heidi E Mason
Chief Financial Officer
Enron Australia

Telephone:  612 9229 2335
Facsimile:     612 9229 2352
Email:           heidi.mason@enron.com


Attached are the Capital Account Balances - Schedule 3.1(g) and the Financial
Statements - Schedule 3.1(i).


Well, folks, one should never use the word 'final' around here!    Friday's
PRC meeting room location at the Hotel Sofitel has been changed to the Opera
Room!

Cindy


Others attending:  Louise Kitchen, Dave Forster, John Lavarato


I'd love to but I'll be in London

	Marge Nadasky@ECT
	10/11/2000 12:01 PM

		 To: Robert Horton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew S
Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin
Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Karen S Owens@ees@EES,
Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy G
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Video for Management Conference

You recently received an e-mail from Terrie James regarding a video we are
working on for the upcoming Management Conference.  We have been able to lock
in a date and time to do this taping on Thursday, October 19th, from 4-6
p.m.  We are still working on the location for this taping, but plan on this
taking place in close proximity to the Enron Building.

Can you please let me know if you will be available to participate in this
group session?  If not, we will be following up with some individual taping
the week of the 23rd.

If you have questions, feel free to contact Terrie James on Ext. 37727, or
myself on Ext. 36631.

Marge Nadasky


Phillips Breckenridge is scheduled for an in person interview on Wednesday August 15,2001.  Phillips Breckenridge is interviewing for Job # 109717  .His resume is attached for your review. Please accept this request so an appointment will be reflected on your calendar.

Thank you,
Gretchen Hardeway
5-8701


something was wrong with the email system and all the emails i sent a week
ago are getting there now.  everyone is emailing me asking what the hell my
emails mean.  i pay attention to your emails.


Yeah, give me about 10 minutes.


Kelly Johnson just called and confirmed there will be a Special Board Meeting at Noon in EB-5001 today.


I believe this was intended for the other Susan Scott...I'm with Nat Gas trading.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi
Subject:	FERC Order on MSG

Susan, Could you or someone else be on the lookout for FE's tariff filings in compliance with this order.  Thanks.
Janine
----- Forwarded by Janine Migden/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001 09:10 AM -----

	Janine Migden 05/08/2001 09:08 AM 	   To: Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S Laipple/DUB/EES@EES, Adam Cooper/DUB/EES@EES, Dana Saucier/DUB/EES@EES, Tim Weithman/DUB/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, John Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Reinecke/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Buranit Suttabustya/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter Vint/HOU/EES@EES, Robert D Gresch/HOU/EES@EES, Anthony Barnhart/DUB/EES@EES, Eric P Niemeyer/DUB/EES@EES, John D Burrows/HOU/EES@EES, Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Anderson/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT  cc: (bcc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron)  Subject: FERC Order on MSG

FERC has approved FE's modifications to its market based tariff (MBT) to accomodate the provision of 1120 MW of MSG with the following changes:

1.  On the subject of billing, FERC noted that it could see no reason why the MSG customers should be treated differently than the MRT customers who recieve a bill on the 5th of the month for the previous month's usage and must pay by the 19th, giveing customers 14 days.  Thus, FE waasordered to change the billing timetable to be consistent with the MRT.  This gives us more time to make payment.

2.  FE is required to submit rate schedules which it had failed to do, covering, Service Schedules A &B, Application for Service, Form of Service Agreement, Form of Certificate of Concurrence, Saummary of Transmission and Ancilliary Service Charges and Code of Conduct.

Also in the order was a discussion of assignability since Shell argued that  MSG should be assignable from one marketer to another or to an aggregator.  FERC said that since Sec. 18.01 of the MRT provides that a customer can assign its rights and obligations with the written consent of FE which consent can not be unreasonably withheld, assignment is allowed.

I am faxing a copy of this to Nicole and Gloria for our Houston files, should anyone want to read the order.

Janine


SK - I've taken care of booking him a conf room/office on 47.  mm

As an organisational announcement is imminent, and it is no secret, that I
will be assuming responsibility for Asia (including Japan), Africa, and
Australia, I am planning to fly to Houston on Sunday, 13 Feb., and would like
to meet each of you, either because you will become a direct report, or a new
customer.  I will have my assistant, Sharon, coordinate times.  I will look
forward to the prospect of meeting each of you.  Should your schedule not
allow a meeting this time, I will be back in Houston on Monday 13 March.  If
you know of anyone else I should meet, but have inadvertently omitted from
this list, please feel free to advise Sharon, as well.   thanks  mcs

Sharon - for many of these people I can go their offices, but see if Maureen
can find a space I can land for meetings, as some will not have offices.


Yes,
	2022 Windsor Houston TX 77006

	Send it there.

	What's my tally??? And what is Enron going to reimburse??

	geof

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	vicki storey <vickistorey@yahoo.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-vicki+20storey+20+3Cvickistorey+40yahoo+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	gstorey@enron.com
Subject:	Fwd: Confirm Address for Tax Returns

--- vicki.l.meszaros@ca.pwcglobal.com wrote:
> From: <vicki.l.meszaros@ca.pwcglobal.com>
> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 09:24:21 -0600
> Subject: Confirm Address for Tax Returns
> To: vickistorey@yahoo.com, gstorey@enron.com
>
> Hi, Geoff,
>
> Could you please confirm that your Windsor address
> is to be used on your
> tax returns.  Also, would you like your completed
> tax package sent to this
> address?  We will be sending out your returns as
> soon as possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vicki Meszaros
>
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
> Phone (403) 509-7469
> Fax (403) 781-1825
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the
> person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged
> material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
> or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited.   If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete
> the material from any
> computer.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


"Kirkpatrick, Joe" <joe.kirkpatrick@nrgenergy.com> writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

In order to have a functioning market model it is imperative to have a
level playing field for all market participants.

Is it a level playing field or even appropriate for any individual
market participant to dispatch generation and transmission facilities
that affect the economics of other market participants? The dispatch of
transmission and generation to resolve congestion must be made with the
overall economics of the entire market in mind. The only entity that has
the information and empowered to make these decisions is the NYISO.

With that in mind why does a particular market participant have control
over major interfaces that interconnect New York and PJM. Specifically
the control points would be the Linden-Goethals phase angle regulator
and the Hudson Farragut phase angle regulators. These PARs are under
ConEd control and are utilized by ConEd to facilitate whatever
requirements they deem required. As this is being written the New York
PJM schedule is 546 MW out to New York with a flow of 762 MW the flow on
these PARs (including Ramapo) is ~1500 MW to New York.

Are the interests of all market participants being considered by a
market participant that has over 40% of the load in New York State, that
has control over a significant amount of generation utilizing OOM
dispatches and by having control over a significant amount of
transmission facilities capable of altering the flow into New York City
and Central x East.

I suspect not.

Case in point..

There is a transmission constraint in an area in New York city. This
constraint can only be monitored by ConEd and therefore is resolved
utilizing an OOM dispatch request. Generation was reduced to resolve the
constraint, there is another generator in the area that can be reduced
to resolve the constraint, but it would appear that this control action
is not utilized . Coincidently the power from this other generator is
under contract to ConEd (take-or-pay). There is also a PAR
(Linden-Goethals) that can be moved to alleviate the constraint, which
unfortunately is not utilized either. Instead generation is reduced that
does result in additional uplift charges that is socialized as a cost to
all loads in New York. Whether the right economic decisions are being
made is an issue but the larger issue is why is a market participant
with a large economic interest making these decisions.

The NYISO was asked why the PAR was not utilized as a control action to
alleviate the constraint, simply put since the PAR is not under their
control they do not consider it as a control action.

Since ConEd does not have the overall market view or the economic
interests of all market participants in mind is it appropriate to allow
them to operate and dispatch a large part of New York State?

When the NYISO is not controlling major inter-area transmission
interfaces but allows that control to be utilized by a market
participant it is a compromise of the entire market. Economics of an
individual market participant are overriding the economics of all other
participants in New York.

This is not a "best practice" that any sane individual would recommend
for any RTO model.

Joe Kirkpatrick


Thanks buddies and buddettes.  I may bring yall some scheduler treats if I make it in on Monday.  Then again I may just forget but remember I love you all.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Loving, Scott
Subject:	IT Activity

No IT activity for Dec. for CGulf or VGS for ENA!


As a clarification, the daily capacity which may be available at Carlton will only be a consideration on non Carlton resolution days rather than non-SOL days.  The attached file shows this.
Ranelle
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paladino, Ranelle
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Aschwege, Doug; Blair, Lynn; Brennan, Lorna; Dornan, Dari; Dushinske, John; Fowler, Bill; January, Steve; Johnson, Robert L.; Lagerstrom, Karen; Mercaldo, Vernon; Neville, Sue; Pritchard, John; Sans Souci, Becki; Semin, Frank; Stevens, Bob; Wilkinson, Chuck; Williams, Jo; Winckowski, Michele
Subject:	short term/daily capacity update

I wanted to make sure everyone was aware of the changes that we have had so far to the available short-term sustainable/daily capacity approvals/postings.  The attached file shows the points that have been approved as potential points for short term sustainable and/or daily capacity.  We currently have 20,000 MMBtu/day posted as available short term sustainable capacity for the month of November for Ventura and Demarc as receipts.  We also have 3,600 MMBtu/day posted as available short term sustainable capacity for the month of November for East leg deliveries.  Daily we may/may not have available 5,000 East Leg delivery capacity and 20,000 Carlton delivery capacity.

Several of the points that have been approved for sale of short term capacity if it becomes available currently show no available firm capacity for the rest of November.  These points include:  TBPL/Beatrice, Pony Express, and Mullinville as receipts and Keystone as a delivery.  If gas control and planning determine we can support additional receipts/deliveries at these points, the available capacity postings could change.

If you have questions or would like to know where the postings are located on our website, let me know.  Also, please forward this on to other members of your team that I haven't included above.  Thanks.

Ranelle


if they don't win i read that they are going to break up the team


I'm with you on that

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE:

The only thing I have to look forward to.

That'll be fine

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

Max Movers (713 680 8700) is coming to my house tomorrow at about 8:30 (first pick up of the day) to move the sofa to your house.  I suspect they will be there by 9ish.  Is that ok?


let me know if you need my help.  I'd suggest leaving vince a voicemail....

Jeff

Piazze <Piazze@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 10/02/2000 12:31:09 PM
To: "'jeff.shankman@enron.com'" <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FAP

Jeff:

It was a pleasure to meet you last week at the Inn at Penn.  It sounds as
though Enron is doing some very exciting things with more to come in the
future.

I called Vince Kaminski a few times last week.  His secretary mentioned that
he was off again this week on a business trip returning on Oct 9th, I
believe.  I am confident that he will get a project proposal to us by the 13
Oct deadline.

Thank you for your support of the Wharton School.  We look forward to having
Enron host a Tiger Team Project.

Sincerely,
Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
(215) 573-8394
(215) 573-5727 fax
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


Mark,
I noticed you weren't copied on this, and as Paul Simons is on holiday
thought I would pass a copy on to you. The FX business which is referred to
is that which was acquired with the Rudolf Wolff asset purchase on 6/30
(executed by MG Metals). Gary Hickerson/Trena McFarland are currently
reviewing the commercial options for this business.
rgds
Janine
---------------------- Forwarded by Janine Juggins/LON/ECT on 01/08/2000
18:56 ---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
01/08/2000 18:35
To: GILBERGD@SULLCROM.COM
cc: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Trena
McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD

Subject: Foreign Exchange from a US entity

David

Further to our recent telephone conversation, we would be grateful if you
would give us a brief written summary on the regulatory and/or legal issues
governing a US corporation transacting foreign exchange with US and non-US
customers. My basic understanding of our telephone conversation was that, as
a non-bank, neither the Fed, the SEC nor the CFTC have any jurisdiction.
However the Commodities Exchange Act prohibits us from contracting with
certain types of counterparties.

The potential business we are looking at currently covers outright foreign
exchange with counterparties such as banks, securities houses, funds,
corporates and, possibly, high net worth individuals. The business also
covers the provision of EFP facilities for these customers whereby they
ultimately receive a currency futures position on the IMM division of the CME
or on FINEX. This latter area is one where, from the Exchanges' points of
view, we would effectively be acting as an executing broker.

I hope this brief description is enough for you to be able to respond but if
you have any questions or would like further clarification, you can contact
me by e-mail or by telephone on +44 20 7265 5421.

Thank you for your help in this.

Kind regards.

Jon Barrett


Hi Andy,

The following spreadsheets represent net generated positions on bullets and strips through the date indicated on the name of the spreadsheet.  I only looked back 90 days, so it won't include any of the strip trading (not a lot) done prior to July 25.  If you want me to have these included, let me know.

Thanks!
 --jay


Start Date: 10/9/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100921.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Per Carol St. Clair, at this time, there is no urgency in finalizing and executing any master netting agreements.  No master netting agreement should be signed without Bill Bradford's or Louise Kitchen's prior approval.  If any questions, please contact either Carol or Elizabeth Sager.

Thanks!

Marie


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Operational Risk Forum 30C2

Date:		11/26/2001
Time:		11:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 04:10 PM -----

	"Nicole Fink" <nicole@pos.org>
	03/13/2001 04:06 PM

		 To: mpalmer@enron.com, janel.Guerrero@enron.com, david Lugar
<DLugar@QuinnGillespie.com>, aameece@qgadc.com
		 cc: rSCHRIEFER@aol.com, bill McInturff <bill@pos.org>, matt Jason
<matt@pos.org>
		 Subject: Enron Executive Summary

Enron Team:

Attached please find an executive summary from the California
statewide survey.  We will do the full presentation of the survey
findings on Friday's conference call (call in information will be sent
to you shortly).

Please give me a call or send an email with any questions or
comments.  Thanks.

Nicole Fink
Public Opinion Strategies
(703) 836-7655
nicole@pos.org

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  exec summary.PDF
     Date:  13 Mar 2001, 16:33
     Size:  18951 bytes.
     Type:  Unknown

 - exec summary.PDF


Folks  -- Attached is a summary of the Commission's Order on California.
Constitutional Crisis here we come.  Later JOE


What the latest with Force?  Should we proceed with this amendment...
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000 05:22 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John Suttle                           02/15/2000 05:17 PM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Forcenergy Inc.

Team,

Can we please amend the collateral threshold in the draft ISDA for the above
referenced counterparty?  The new collateral threshold amount should be
$2,500,000.  No other changes are necessary to the document and I hope
therefore that a full credit worksheet will not be necessary.

Please call me if you have any questions.  Fred is looking for this asap, so
if we could have it to him by noon or so tomorrow, he will be quite
appreciative.

Thanks,

John


Stinson,

Thanks

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"stinson gibner" <sgibner@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:54 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Re: FW: sganjooresume

Vince,
Attached is a draft recommendation letter for Shalesh.  Let me know if I can be of further help.
--Stinson

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here << File: 'http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag2_etl_EN.asp' >>

 - ShaleshJan02.doc << File: ShaleshJan02.doc >>


Whoo-hooo!

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/21/2001 02:16 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/21 Checkout

Amerex West Checkout
No errors- Clean Checkout

Prebon West Checkout
No errors-Clean Checkout

Bloomberg Checkout
No errors-Clean Checkout

Thanks!!


Ross,

The only thought I have with respect to this request would be that it should
not apply if FCEL has failed to comply with its warranty obligations, or has
declined to service the modules after the warranty period has expired.

Kay

"Levine, Ross" <rlevine@fce.com> on 11/08/2000 03:22:30 PM
To: "'Jacqueline Scheib'" <jscheib@rc.com>, "'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'"
<Stephen.Plauche@enron.com>, Scott.Healy@enron.com, Heather.Kroll@enron.com,
Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: "Leitman, Jerry" <jleitman@fce.com>, "Nock, Herb" <HNock@FCE.com>, "Leo,
Tony" <tleo@fce.com>, "Bentley, Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>, "Mahler, Joseph"
<jmahler@fce.com>

Subject: Additional Contract Item

Jackie, Stephen, Scott, Kay, Heather:

We have an additional item we did not discuss today. We want to add to the
agreement a provision to the effect that:

The Purchaser (include their successors and/or assigns, subcontractors,
vendors, operators, etc.) may not open or in any other manner attempt to
view the interior of the DFC modules without Seller's express written
consent. Failure to comply with this provision would: a) Void all warranties
with respect to the Unit and b) Be considered an automatic violation and
breach of the confidentiality provisions of the agreement and subject to all
remedies for such violation.

Tony: We will also add the same provision to the O&M manuals.

Jackie: Please draft appropriate language for the agreement and include it
in the latest draft of the agreement.

Thank you.

Ross M. Levine, Esq.
Director of Contracts and Contracts Counsel
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
3 Great Pasture Rd.
Danbury, CT 06813

(203) 825-6057
(203) 798-2945 (fax)
rlevine@fce.com (email)

This transmittal and its attached files (if any) may contain proprietary or
confidential information belonging to FuelCell Energy, Inc. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error. Any review, disclosure, use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you
suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at 1-(203) 825-6000, or e-mail at jryan@fce.com and
immediately delete this message and all its attachments.


Hey guys, please update the volumes for 5/00 by April 25, 2000 (tuesday)
@5:00pm.

thanks
joann


Neither ENA/RAC/EGF employees nor family members or others living in their
household or financially dependent on the ENA/RAC/EGF employee may purchase
or sell securities of any entity (or derivatives thereof) listed on the
Restricted List for your or their personal or related accounts or recommend
the purchase or sale of such securities to any person, except with the prior
approval of the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal
Department.

In addition to the trading restrictions above, should you at any time possess
non-public material information about any public company, you, your family
members and anybody that is financially dependent on you, are restricted from
trading in that issue, and you may not disclose the non-public material
information to anyone that does not have a business need to know.

Company Name Stock Symbol

3 TEC Energy Corp.       TTEN
Active Power ACPW
Adrian Resources ADRRF
Beau Canada Exploration Ltd BAU CN
Belco Oil & Gas Corporation BOG
Bonus Resource Services Corp BOU
Brigham Exploration BEXP
CanFibre Group Ltd. CFGL
Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. CRZO
Costilla Energy COSE
Crown Energy CROE
CyNet, Inc. CYNE
Cypress Energy CYZ
Esenjay Exploration ESNJ
FirstWorld Communications Inc. FWIS
Hanover Compressor Co. HC
ICE Drilling Enterprises Inc. IDF
Industrial Holdings, Inc. IHII
Inland Resources, Inc. INLN
Kafus Environmental Industries, Inc. KS
Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co Ltd NSM SET
Paladin Resources PLC PLR LD
Paradigm Geophysical PGEOF
Place Resources, Inc. PLG CN
Quanta Services Inc. PWR
Queen Sand Resources, Inc. QSRI
Quicksilver Resources Inc. KWK
Saxon Petroleum, Inc. SXN CN
Southwest Royalties SWROY
Startech SEH CN
Syntroleum Corp. SYNM
Tejon Ranch Corp. TRC
Tetonka Drilling TDI
TransCoastal Marine Services, Inc. TCMS

The Restricted List is solely for the internal use of ENA/RAC/EGF.  No one
may engage in discussions regarding whether a security is or is not on the
Restricted List with persons outside ENA/RAC/EGF without specific clearance
from the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal Department.

In addition to the above, you are reminded that pursuant to Enron Corp.'s
Risk Management Policy ("Policy"), no ENA/RAC/EGF employee may engage in the
trading of any "Position"  ("Position" means any  commodity, financial
instrument, security, equity, financial asset or liability that are
authorized for trading in
the

Policy for the benefit of any party other than ENA/RAC/EGF, whether for
his/her own account or the account of any third party, where such Position
relates to (i) any commodity,  financial instrument, security, equity,
financial asset or liability which falls within such employee's
responsibility at ENA/RAC/EGF or (ii) any energy commodity.

The prohibitions listed above do not replace or modify the policies set forth
in ENA's Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and
Securities Trading, Enron Corp.'s Risk Management Policy, or Enron Corp.'s
Conduct of Business Affairs.  Should you have any questions regarding the
above, please contact me at ext. 31939.


Here is the text of their spot. Attn: PSI, dub will  arrive tomorrow.


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zufferli, John
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE:

I never wrote nor implied that I was intending to hedge currency exposure with a third party.  I implied that I will hedge with you guys when and where I deem appropriate in the term structure.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:

John,

I don't have all the facts around this transaction, but I don't think you are authorized to hedge currency exposure with outside counterparties as you've outlined in your email to Hickerson, etc.  I'd appreciate some information.

Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 11:03
AM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/19/2001 09:45:40 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'ben.jacoby@enron.com'"
<ben.jacoby@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: Marked

Ben and Kay:

For ease of reference, I am attaching the latest draft of letter agreement,
marked to show all changes since the version sent out on Thursday, April
12th (the version that Ben was commenting on yesterday at lunch).

Regards,

Marisa Reuter

 <<MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC


What's up with you?  I talked to Mark, we both decided.....NO WAY!!!!!!!!!  No just kidding, you better get your best dress ready for you interview!  Your interview questions are going to be REAL TOUGH!

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Rawlings-Curtis [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 11:06 AM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Wassup?

trying to call you at home.  Get off the line so I can get through!

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Coal Trading
The liquidity in trading of the Standard European Coal Agreement has
increased significantly over the last 6 weeks.  Many counterparties that
previously opted to stay on the sidelines finally chose to join the game.
Since the contract's inception at the beginning of the year, Enron has traded
a total of 5.3 million tons against the SECA contract, of which 3.8 million
tons has been traded via EnronOnline since July 2000.  We are 5.3 million
tons of a total traded market of 5.8 million tons.

Principal Investments
Tridium Inc., the leading provider of Internet-based automation
infrastructure solutions, announced the close of a $20 million round of
capital funding. The funds will be used to increase Tridium,s sales and
technical support offices in North America, expand its operations into Europe
and Asia, and enhance its technology and products. kRoad Ventures, L.P. and
Enron North America each contributed $10 million in venture capital.

Corporate Development
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny
Energy, Inc., announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which
Allegheny Energy Supply will purchase three Enron natural gas-fired merchant
generating facilities. The acquisition is expected to close in the 2nd
quarter of 2001.

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

The deadline to provide feedback is Friday, November 17.  If you have been
selected to provide feedback on one of your fellow employees, please take the
time to fill out an evaluation online at www.pep.enron.com.

IN THE NEWS

"Enron Corp., already North America's biggest, buyer and seller of natural
gas and electric power is dead serious about its efforts to capture a big
slice of the $400 billion global trade in pulp, paper and lumber."
-Reuters News Service

2000 CHAIRMAN,S AWARD NOMINEES
Please join us in congratulating the ENA/EIM/EGM/ employees who have been
recognized as Chairman,s award nominees.

Congratulations to:

 Irma Alvarez  Alan Aronowitz  Rick Bergseiker  Carol Coats  Joya Davis
Rufino Durante
 Sue Foust  Julie Gomez  Barbara Gray  Jackie Griffith  John Harrison  Gerri
Irvine
 Kathy Benedict  Michael Kelley  Mike McConnell  Dave Nommensen Ina Norman
Juan Padron
 Veronica Parra  Michael Roberts  Rhonda Robinson Kevin Sweeney  Helen
Taylor  Stacey White

Extra kudos to BARBARA GRAY, who is a finalist for the 2000 Chairman,s
Award.  Barbara and ten other individuals are flying to San Antonio from
around the world to be honored at Enron,s annual Management Conference.  One
of these finalists will be recognized as the 2000 Chairman,s Award winner.

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Anil Chandy, Alejandra Chavez
EGM ) Marty Cates, JoAnne Underwood, Brad Miller

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Mark Wadlington, Jennifer Blay-Smith, Georgian Landau, Kathryn Bussell,
John Coleman, Steven Gillespie, Clarissa Garcia, Ina Rangel, Farouk Lalji,
Eva Rainer, Chuchu Wang, Smith Day
EGM ) Gloria Solis, Carmella Jones, Nancy Haralson

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed outside of Enron.