Stephen,

The comments in Blue as we discussed requires additional clarification.  The
far field distance is that from the proposed sites to the nearest residence.

Mike Nanny

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael D Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/03/2000 05:55 PM ---------------------------

Anthony Butler on 11/03/2000 12:51:15 PM
To: Larry Leib/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael D
Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gary
Bush/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: FCE Test Procedure

Mike:

Attached is the modified guidelines we would like FCE to use.

As explained in my previous e-mail, I have revamped the entire document to
reflect the understanding reached during our conference call.  We have also
tried to specify some additional things throughout the document.

I believe this is a complete and much better organize set of fuel cell
performance evaluation guidelines.  Hopefully FCE can agree and clear the
remaining issues which are summarized below (in blue)...

Request FCEand Developoer to do the following before guideline is complete:

A)  Clearly define differences between base load and max guarantee output.
Guideline currently uses both of these terms as the same loading condition.
B)  FCE must review the items for which plant performance shall be corrected
for.  I have a feeling that not enough attention was given to this subject in
their latest review.
C)  Enron to define  far field noise measurement locations
D) FCE to confirm inclusion of items bracketed in list of auxiliaries to be
accounted for

Larry:  I included a note in the text of the document addressing the reasons
for removing the catalyst efficiency correction from the list of corrections
to be used for unit output power and efficiency.

Regards,

Tony Butler

Larry Leib@ENRON
11/03/2000 12:25 PM
To: Anthony Butler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: FCE Test Procedure

Tony,

I like much the reformatting job.  We should send with the following:

Identify that we have removed recently added reference to catalyst efficiency
from list of conditions for which acceptance test performance corrections
apply.  FCE should provide justification if required for Warrantee Compliance
Test (as BOP system).

Request FCEand Developoer to do the following before guideline is complete:

A)  Clearly define differences between base load and max guarantee output.
Guideline currently uses both of these terms as the same loading condition.
B)  FCE must review the items for which plant performance shall be corrected
for.  I have a feeling that not enough attention was given to this subject in
their latest review.
C)  Enron to define  far field noise measurement locations
D) FCE to confirm inclusion of items bracketed in list of auxiliaries to be
accounted for

Add what else you need to say and forward to Mike.

Thanks,

Larry


Per your request, here is the expanded version of the EBS bullet points from
Donald and I.

----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 10/03/00 11:46 AM
-----
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|
|                         |   Donald Lassere        |
|
|                         |                         |   ? ? ? ? To:
? ? ? ?Sue|
|                         |   10/02/00 03:13 PM     |   Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
|
|                         |                         |   ? ? ? ? cc:
|
|                         |                         |   Scott Bolton/Enron
|
|                         |                         |   Communications@Enron
|
|                         |                         |   Communications
|
|                         |                         |   ? ? ? ? Subject:
|
|                         |                         |   Bullet points for
Rick|
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|

YR2000

Protect and Enhance Existing Assets and Positions

BLM/Forest Service Rights-of-Way Issue - Defeat new federal policy to charge
exorbitant fees and conditions on right-of-way usage.
Day-to-day Global Risk Management support - Providing regulatory and
analytical support to Trading desk and to commercial deal teams to mitigate
regulatory risk and structure deals to avoid regulatory/policy obstacles.

Support Potential Transactions
Curtailment of USF, taxes and avoidance of common carrier regulation -
Provide deal structuring support to limit financial risk to commercial
groups and trading desk.
Provided regulatory analysis to allow bandwidth to be traded on EOL -
Provided due diligence and structuring advice to allow bandwidth to be
bought and sold in a new on-line format; avoiding common carrier regulation
due to new format.

New Market Development
Domestic licensing initiative to support of BWT - Enabling greater time
to market for bandwidth trading by securing state PUC certificates.
This initiative also allows physical infrastructure deployment as part
of bandwidth trading network architecture.
Latin American and Canadian regulatory analysis and licensing to support
BWT and Media Cast - Performed basic market entry licensing for
commercial teams with an emphasis on avoiding traditional regulation on
Media cast and advanced services.

Create and Exploit Opportunities
Ability to obtain Wholesale Prices on Bandwidth and Interconnection -
Using regulatory conditions of the '96mTelecom Act to improve
positions and quickly provision services to customers.
Avoidance of "telecommunications service" regulation of Internet Apps,
IP Products and Media Cast ?- Carefully guided commercial groups in
legal structure, marketing, tax, and physical deployment of service to
avoid traditional telecom regulation.

YR2001
Protect and Enhance Existing Assets and Positions
Legislative action in support of BLM/Forest Service Rights-of-Way
Issue - Continue to curtail onerous right-of-way regulation;
participate in federal avisory commission on right-of-way use.
Continued day-to-day Global Risk Management support - Provide
regulatory and analytical support to Trading desk and to commercial
deal teams to mitigate regulatory risk and structure deals to avoid
regulatory/policy obstacles.

Support Potential Transactions
Support Blockbuster VOD and other multimedia initiatives -
Provide regulatory due diligence and policy support to enable VOD
and other advanced services to be rolled-out. ?Coordinate EBS
efforts with content and distribution partners.
Continued curtailment of USF, taxes and avoidance of common
carrier regulation of Bandwidth Trading in the Americas -
Continue structuring advice to comply with country regulation and
the mitigation of financial and regulatory risk.

New Market Development
Spectrum trading and new markets - Supporting commercial teams
by providing research and policy development to open new
markets or make existing markets more competitive.
Deregulation/regulatory forbearance in Latin America - Begin
pro-competitive de-regulation effort in "closed" market
countries on Latin America.

Create and Exploit Opportunities
Establishment of national CLECs in North and South America -
This initiative will allow the deployment of infrastructure
for bandwidth trading and local loop provisioning.
Collaborate with International Tax to minimize EBS's tax
exposure in Latin America and Canada ?- ? Develop
structuring models to reduce tax risk on international
transactions; seek rulings on how cross-bporder bandwidth
transactions will be treated.


EOL Deals	 From: 10/1/2001   To: 10/10/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 10/1/2001   To: 10/10/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 252	 4,836,400	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 41	 2,041,375
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 140	 2,103,000	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 170	 6,195,037
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 235	 4,083,786	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 162	 9,826,405
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 1,270	 2,061,637	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 494	 1,526,993
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 648	 597,900	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 299	 528,566
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 876	 1,460,474	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 422	 2,179,937
 	 Real Time	 585	 15,050	  	 Real Time	 290	 26,932

 	 Grand Total	 4,006	 15,158,247	  	 Grand Total	 1,878	 22,325,245

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/10/2001   To: 10/10/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 10/10/2001   To: 10/10/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 42	 1,023,600	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 6	 174,000
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 19	 431,200	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 42	 1,119,262
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 61	 896,375	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 17	 870,270
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 178	 523,795	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 57	 155,379
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 75	 85,800	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 36	 68,866
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 139	 310,175	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 75	 374,400
 	 Real Time	 49	 1,225	  	 Real Time	 29	 2,578
 	  	  	  	  	  	 262	 2,764,755
 	 Grand Total	 563	 3,272,170	  	 Grand Total

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/10/2001   To: 10/10/2001
 	 EES	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 9	 1,800
 	 Month-to-Date	 41	 9,400

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 10/10/2001   To: 10/10/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $     17.88
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 800	 400	  $     21.43
 	 Mid C (P, Bal Month)	 6,800	 0	  $     23.50
 	 Mid C (P, Nov-01)	 30,000	 30,000	  $     28.13
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 30,000	 0	  $     35.58
 	 NP-15 (P, Next Day)	 2,400	 0	  $     23.82
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 1,600	 600	  $     18.05
 	 NP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 40,800	 13,600	  $     26.82
 	 NP-15 (OP, Bal Month)	 15,675	 0	  $     21.10
 	 NP-15 (OP, Nov-01)	 16,000	 16,000	  $     23.50
 	 NP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 40,000	 0	  $     28.49
 	 NP-15 (OP, Dec-01)	 8,600	 8,600	  $     27.25
 	 NP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 20,000	 0	  $     34.75
 	 NP-15 (P, Q1 02)	 30,400	 0	  $     33.70
 	 NP-15 (P, Q3 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     47.00
 	 NP-15 (P, Q4 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     37.00
 	 NP-15 (P, Cal 02)	 122,800	 0	  $     37.30
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 11,200	 800	  $     24.59
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 600	 200	  $     13.50
 	 Palo (P, Bal Month)	 115,600	 20,400	  $     26.39
 	 Palo (P, Nov-01)	 110,000	 10,000	  $     26.55
 	 Palo (P, Dec-01)	 10,000	 0	  $     30.50
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     30.75
 	 Palo (P, Feb-02)	 19,200	 0	  $     29.55
 	 Palo (P, Mar-02)	 41,600	 0	  $     29.31
 	 Palo (P, Q1 02)	 121,600	 60,800	  $     29.90
 	 Palo (P, Jun-02)	 20,000	 0	  $     41.88
 	 Palo (P, Q2 02)	 30,800	 30,800	  $     34.80
 	 Palo (P, Q3 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     51.50
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 1,000	 200	  $     14.94
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 4,000	 0	  $     24.34
 	 SP-15 (OP, Bal Month)	 15,675	 15,675	  $     18.92
 	 SP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 95,200	 34,000	  $     26.19
 	 SP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 70,000	 0	  $     27.56
 	 SP-15 (OP, Nov-01)	 16,000	 16,000	  $     19.63
 	 SP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 10,000	 0	  $     31.75
 	 SP-15 (OP, Dec-01)	 8,600	 0	  $     23.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Q1 02)	 60,800	 30,400	  $     32.15
 	 SP-15 (P, Q4 02)	 31,600	 0	  $     36.00
 	 SP-15 (P, Cal 02)	 122,800	 0	  $     37.00

 	 Grand Total	 1,385,350	 288,475	  $ 1,146.50


I think that this makes sense.  I'd appreciate your thoughts?

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 07:14 AM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/15/2001 06:20 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Project Requires RCR

The following project requires RCR:

Project Lead: Susan J Mara

Project Name: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA

RCR Title: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA

Proposed Expenditure: $2,300.00

To see more detail on this project, click on the following link >>>


Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


I would suggest you take it up with EBay.  See my attachment regarding EBay's policy on Non Paying Bidder.  I have tried to contact the person that you outbid - the person that bid $60.  He has not responded.  I would suggest you try and contact him to have him pay for the item at his highest bid.  I have bid on items before on EBay and it clearly asks you twice to confirm your bidding amount.  I would be more than willing to change your payment if the price got way out of wack.  $61 is actually cheaper than some of the balls were going for this weekend.  I hope the person that bid $60 will respond and "get you off the hook".  Otherwise, EBay will have to intervene on your behalf.  I guess it is possible, their system messed up, but it looks like you approved a bad bid.  Sorry.  Good luck.
PL

Non-Paying-Bidder / Final Value Fee Credit Request Program  This is your place to learn about eBay's Non-Paying Bidder Program and supporting features. Start here if you're a: * Seller who has a non-paying bidder and would like a Final Value Fee credit for your unsold item. * eBay user who is interested in knowing more about what happens when high bidders don't pay.  Non-Paying bidders face the following consequences through this program: * First offense: warning * Second offense: warning * Third offense: Indefinite Suspension <http://pages.ebay.com/help/basics/g-indefinitesuspension.html> What to do if you're a seller with a non-paying bidder
Step	Explanation	Time Frame
1. Contact each other <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?UserInformationRequest>	Contact each other after your listing has ended. Like you, buyers can have emergencies or computer problems. Your high bidder may not be able to respond to you right away for legitimate reasons. 	Generally within 3 business days is a good idea.
2. Payment Reminder <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?myebayportal>.	Send a payment reminder email to your winning bidder. You can customize the email.	After 3 days but not past 30 days of your listing's close.
3. Non-Paying Bidder Alert. <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?NPBComplaintForm>	File a Non-Paying Bidder Alert if you still don't get a response or if you feel you may not receive payment. Remember: In order to collect your Final Value Fee credit, you must complete a Non-Paying Bidder Alert Form on time. eBay then will send an email to you and your high bidder. Your high bidder will be reminded to pay you and informed of the consequences if no payment is sent.	After 7 days but not past 45 days of your listing's close.
4. Request your Final Value Fee credit <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?CreditRequest>.	Request your Final Value Fee credit if you've: a) Filed a Non-Paying Bidder Alert 7 days or more after your listing has ended and b) Tried unsuccessfully to resolve things with your bidder 10 days after you've filed the Non-Paying Bidder Alert Form above. Your refund will be credited to your account within 48 hours.	Within 60 days of your listing's close.
	Worked things out with the buyer? If you have filed the Final Value Fee credit, you may use the Non-Paying Bidder Warning Removal <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?RemoveNPBWarningShow> to remove the warning for the bidder.	Within 90 days of your listing's close.

Special note about Dutch Auctions: They work the same as other auctions with one exception: You may file a Non-Paying Bidder Alert Form only once per auction for as many bidders as necessary. That is, you cannot go back and file additional Alerts if you have more non-paying bidders from the same auction.  Special note to bidders: If you are a bidder and believe you received an unfair warning, you may appeal it by using eBay's Non-Paying Bidder Appeal Form <http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?SendQueryEmailShow&subject=npb>. Warnings will remain on your record until they are successfully appealed.  Visit our Non-Paying Bidder Frequently Asked Questions <http://pages.ebay.com/help/basics/f-npb.html>.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"LAURIN HAYES" <laurinh@prodigy.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:39 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Cc:	eBay Customer Support
Subject:	Re: What are you talking about $1600?

NO I'AM NOT GOING TO PAY 61.00. PLEASE EXAMINE THE ATTACHMENT AND YOU'LL SEE
WHY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@ENRON.com>
To: <laurinh@prodigy.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:30 AM
Subject: What are you talking about $1600?

I have you down for $61 plus shipping, not $1,600.  I show that you bid at
$6.99 and at $61.  There was no bid for $19.99 listed at all.  I am sorry if
you did not mean to bid $61, but it is hardly out of the range - these balls
were selling this weekend for $80-90.  If your winning bid was $200 or
higher I could understand your complaint and we could make an adjustment,
but $61 is not an unreasonable amount.  Please let me know if you are
planning on paying the $61(I will pay shipping if you use PayPal).  If not,
I need to contact EBay for resolution.  I need a response as soon as
possible.  Thanks.
PL

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

Received: from vmc-ext.prodigy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by vmc-wfldad with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:52:25 -0500
Received: from garak.ebay.com (miles.ebay.com [216.33.156.140])	by vmc-ext.prodigy.net (8.11.0.pi.sasl.milter.rejectatdoor.disable/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0M0nmB190628	for <laurinh@prodigy.net>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:49:49 -0500
Received: from wallace.sjc.ebay.com (wallace.sjc.ebay.com [10.1.20.64])	by garak.ebay.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0M0lJ930764	for <laurinh@prodigy.net>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:47:19 -0800
Message-Id: <200201220047.g0M0lJ930764@garak.ebay.com>
To: laurinh@prodigy.net
From: bidconfirm@ebay.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="==_MIME-Boundary-1_=="
Subject: eBay Bid Notice - Item 1065594740: Enron Titleist TP 90 Golf Balls
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:47:20 PST

[IMAGE]

Thank you for bidding in the Collectibles:Advertising:Gas and Oil:Other Gas, Oil category, thorhawk!

[IMAGE]
      We appreciate the trading you do on eBay and want to confirm the details of your bid.      Item name:  Enron Titleist TP 90 Golf Balls   Item number:  1065594740   Your current bid:  $16.00   Your maximum bid:  $1,600.00   End date:  Jan-21-02 22:36:59 PST   Current price:  $16.00     To view the item you're bidding on, click here:  http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1065594740 << File: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1065594740 >>
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] Own your own TIMESHARE in Florida, Hawaii, Mexico, Aspen, Lake Tahoe, San Francisco, etc. Timesharing is a great concept and eBay is the place to get Great Deals! Visit www.ebayTimeshares.com << File: http://www.ebayTimeshares.com >>     Direct from IBM!  FREE shipping on software, including ViaVoice speech recognition from $19.99.  Hot Deals on refurbished IBM Servers!  Technical training/courses too!  BID NOW! << File: http://www.ebaystores.com/ibm >>    Save Big on CDs & DVDs! Get 12 CDs FREE (+ s&h) from Columbia House! Choose from a wide selection of top artists like 'N Sync, Faith Hill, Jennifer Lopez and more -- all at incredible savings. Plus, order 4 DVDs for just 49  each (+ s&h) featuring recent Hollywood hits and all your favorite stars! Click for details:   CDs at chcd.com from Columbia House << File: http://mojofarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-2357-104 >>   DVDs at chdvd.com from Columbia House << File: http://mojofarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-2357-103 >>   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Safety Tip: It is against eBay policy for a seller to contact you about buying a similar or identical item outside of eBay.  This type of transaction is not covered by the services we provide to protect you - such as feedback, insurance and dispute resolution.  For your own protection, please do not participate.   Note: Your bid is considered a binding contract with the seller (except for Real Estate and other non-binding bid categories). For more information on what to do if you placed this bid by mistake, click here:  http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?RetractBidShow << File: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?RetractBidShow >>

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] You selected to receive this email notification when you registered.  If you do not want to receive these notices in the future, click here:  http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?OptinLoginShow << File: http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?OptinLoginShow >>  . You will be asked to log in.  Then, click NO next to Bid Notices.    Copyright 1995-2001 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.


You might have this info anyway....
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001 12:12
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/22/2001 12:03 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Kay,

The following are the officers of CAED I & II:

David W. Delainey President
Janet R. Dietrich  Managing Director
Mark E. Haedicke  Managing Director and General Counsel
Robert J. Hermann  Managing Director and General Tax Counsel
Julia Heintz Murray Managing Director, General Counsel, Finance and Secretary
Ben F. Glisan  Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Michael J. Miller  Vice President
Stephen H. Douglas  Vice President and Tax Counsel
Elaine V. Overturf  Deputy Corporate Secretary
Teresa R. Callahan  Assistant Secretary
Kate B. Cole   Assistant Secretary
Denise A. Ernest  Assistant Secretary

Kay Mann
01/22/2001 10:12 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Could you let me know how many there are, so I'll know how we want to handle
this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001 10:10
AM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 01/19/2001 06:14:02 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com

Subject: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Kay,

Please have the appropriate managing directors and officers of CAED I
and CAED II execute the attached resignations and return the executed
resignations to Doug Pedigo.  If any other persons were manging
directors or officers of CAED I or CAED II prior to closing, please have
them execute similar resignations and furnish them to Doug.  Thanks.

George

 - 5bx_j01_.DOC


Pat,

You should have been included on this.  I probably won't go to these meetings
since I won't be dealing with Unify much in the future.  I don't mind going
with you for the first couple of times if you need me to, though.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------

Heather Choate
01/05/2000 07:33 PM
To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angelina V Lorio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ragayle
Pellum/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Recurring Logistics Unify Meeting

  Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss Logistics Unify Issues and
Priorities
 on a Bi-Monthly basis...

  Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the Month
 Beginning, Tuesday, January 11, 2000
 at 2pm in EB3013

   If at any time you are unable to attend, please call Heather Choate at
x33278.


I caught the call the other day- didn't hear anything that warranted the
reaction seen.Next time I'll send something stronger to drink....
> ----------
> From: 	Greg.Whalley@enron.com[SMTP:Greg.Whalley@enron.com]
> Sent: 	Monday, March 12, 2001 4:17 PM
> To: 	Matthews, Michael L [PVTC]
> Subject: 	Re: Energy impact vs. GDP
>
>
> does it get any uglier than this?
>

--------------------------------------------------------------
Reminder:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure.
Do not use e-mail to send us confidential information
such as credit card numbers, changes of address, PIN
numbers, passwords, or other important information.
Do not e-mail orders to buy or sell securities, transfer
funds, or send time sensitive instructions. We will not
accept such orders or instructions.  This e-mail is not
an official trade confirmation for transactions executed
for your account.  Your e-mail message is not private in
that it is subject to review by the Firm, its officers,
agents and employees.
--------------------------------------------------------------


To all,

I spoke with Jan Aspuru (OUC) this morning.  He indicated the max volume they would take summer would be 60,000 mmbtu/day ten year term.  He went on to say that a winter drop to 50,000 mmbtu/day would help put our proposal in line with what they are currently looking at.  We should assume winter to be November - March.

Items to consider:

Scott - Is their a price drop to entice them into 60,000 baseload to gain access to the winter economics on the 10,000 drop.  i.e.  Do we offer Hub plus .53 for sixty baseload?  Something to consider and your call.  When LNG comes up, notice I said when, we can sculpt.

FM - standard natural gas industry language?  If LNG becomes cover, doesn't allow for any shipping delays, etc.
LD strategy - do we put caps on penalties or an out clause if nondelivery occurs for a certain number of days, presumably a number of months consecutively.

Timeline - We need to get a proposal to them by mid-month.  It appears a short negotiation period to close ends can be had after the previously mentioned July 1 deadline.  Short means about a month.

During our initial discussion, OUC suggested preferred pricing would be Gas Daily Zn 2 plus $.55.  We suggested with our risk management abilities we would consider any pricing they preferred and further suggested Index with the right to convert to Gas Daily or others.  Does the desk have a preference? - Gas Daily exposure seems better for us - but conversion could still be had even under a Gas Daily contract - need your thoughts.  In this regard, I have set a meeting with credit, Phil I'd like you to attend, at 9am tomorrow to begin the process.

Give these items some thought and I will schedule a meeting for Wednesday, June 6th at 4pm in 3259 to discuss.

Phil and I will continue to work toward that meeting.

Thanks for your assistance as we move forward to this agreement.

Regards,

Jared


Do you guys agree with Vernon's answers?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mercaldo, Vernon
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:01 PM
To:	Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn; Miller, Kent
Subject:	Responses to Virginia Power

Please review and let me know if you would like me to change anything you are not comfortable with before I send out to Virginia Power. (I am still waiting on the cities from Gas Control). Jo, you wanted me to get the Plainview South number from planning but see if the way I worded the reponse works.  I will get back to him separately on the fuel language response.

Thanks!


We finally got the website up with photos and tunes.  Hope you have a chance to check it out.  It is at www.truebluegrass.com.   If you don't wish to receive True Blue mail in the future, please just reply with that info and we'll do our best to see that doesn't happen again.  Those of you who were at the Freight show last Sunday - thank you.  Your support was greatly appreciated.  The turnout was great at our first Bay Area appearance, and we look forward to doing it again.  Our next show in the vicinity will be in Davis in January - details to follow at a later date.  That's all for now!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
12:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           03/16/2001 10:25 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2 missing from the mailing list

hingoran@rice.edu
planck@rice.edu


Pam, this is an updated copy of the form.  Please disregard the first note
sent.

Thanks again,

adr

Audrey Robertson
01/23/2001 02:01 PM
To: Pamela Daily/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron (bcc:
Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: An Additional Move

Pam, at your convenience, would you please handle the attached request for
Kevin Hyatt.  We would like to move Michelle Lokay over one space in the
dogbone area.

Please see request attached.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude43.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas43.pdf

Jan WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clf-qof.pdf
Jan Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Jan Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG43.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG43.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL43.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom12-10-01.pdf


I'll send it tomorrow I promise.  I was going to work on it this weekend, but
I couldn't get logged on and I've been a little busy this morning.

Thanks for reminding me.

RR


The incremental financing cost, by my calculation is less than 100,000 and it
was determined to be prudent in light of ENA's interest in keeping these
off-balance sheet, regardless of their use in Canada or the US.  My estimate
is based on 26MM balance, four month average duration (staggered payments),
6% interest rate and 15% withholding tax.  Matt Berry of ENA Finance and
Morris Clark were part of our discussion on this matter.  The reason that we
do not look at it over an extended term is becasue this West LB structure was
put in place as a bridge until Enron determined if the machines were to be
used in Canada or the US.  At that time Enron would put in place either a
Canadian or US permanent structure that would be more tax-efficient.

I am available to talk about this further.  Let me know.

Chris

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           01/31/2000 10:37 AM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: WestLB Transaction

Further to my voice mail, FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 01/31/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           01/26/2000 10:52 AM

To: John J Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: WestLB Transaction

John, the attached is a summary by Greg of the financining for the turbines
purchased from New Brunswick Power.

In summary, ECC pays the bank, West LB directly in three installments under
an off-balance sheet lease financing arrangement.  The first installment of
$US 9MM was made Dec. 1/99.  The next installment is due Feb. 1/00 of $US
8MM, and the third installment is due roughly March 31/00 of $US 8MM. The
"drag" on the financing is that West LB through whom ENA structures its
off-balance sheet turbine financings is not a Canadian resident for tax
purposes, and therefore is not tax efficient to ECC in that there is a 15%
withholding tax payment on the interest (not principal) component of each
lease/financing payment.  An off-balance sheet financing with a Canadian
resident financial institution would eliminate this tax inefficiency, and
this is what I was referring to when I indicated some work may still be
required to restructure the turbine financing.  The withholding tax if we
keep this structure will total roughly C$ 500,000 over all of the
lease/financing payments (Chris Calger has the exact figure).  Any decision
to change the structure should have regard to these costs and the transaction
costs and fees associated with finding a new Canadian resident off-balance
sheet lender.  In addition, if we decide to keep the turbines, or sell or
transfer the turbines to ENA or a third party (depending on commercially what
it is we decide to do with them), additional work may be required to take
title to the turbines, or to assign/restructure the West LB financing and the
New Brunswick Power purchase agreement.  I am confident that the bulk of
commercial legal work for any of these transactions can be handled
internally, but that the tax legal work may require the input of outside
counsel.

We are also obligated to pay GST, but this is ultimately reimbursed through
the lease financing (althoguh there is a time value of money component that
is not recovered from the time GST is paid and when the GST rebate is made).
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 01/26/2000 10:20
AM ---------------------------

Greg Johnston
01/25/2000 05:22 PM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: WestLB Transaction

Peter, referring to your request for an update as to the status and mechanics
of the West LB transaction relating to our acquisition of the NB Power
turbines, please be advised as follows:

1.  Although ENA executed the Acquisition and Development Agreement (the
"Agreement") with WestLB, all of ENA's interest in that Agreement was
immediately assigned to Enron Canada, meaning that we are directly
responsible for making all funding requests and all cost of borrowing
payments to WestLB.

2.  The initial payment on the turbines was made through WestLB for an amount
of US$9,000,000 on December 1, 1999.  GST was payable on US$5,000,000 of that
amount.

3.  The next installment is due to NB Power on February 1, 2000 and is for an
amount of US$8,000,000.  Laura Scott will be initiating the funding request
in the next day or so to allow the advance to be a LIBOR advance.  WestLB
will then attend to paying the installment payment (plus GST) to NB Power on
Feb 1.

4.  The final installment payment is for an amount of US$8,000,000 and is due
on the earlier of the date on which we commence disassembling the turbines
and March 31, 2000.

5.  The cost to Enron Canada for utilizing WestLB, who is not registered in
Canada to carry on business, is that we are required to pay withholding tax
of 15% on all costs of borrowing (ie. interest payments).  The interest is
calculated at a LIBOR rate.

6.  WestLB has now registered themselves in Canada for GST purposes and will
be making the required GST payments to NB Power and then applying for the GST
rebate, which rebate amount is for our account under the Agreement.

7.  WestLB is aware that, depending on how we proceed with our required use
of the turbines, they will be taken out either with respect to (i) the
interim financing or, if the interim financing period is short (ie. if we
were going to proceed immediately to finish paying for the turbines and
commence moving them), (ii) when we put the SPV in place to build the
project.

8.  If we determine that the turbines are to go to Houston and be moved into
the US, the withholding tax issue obviously disappears.  If we determine to
proceed with the project in some fashion but the interim financing period
will be more than a month or so, it probably makes sense to remove WestLB
from the interim financing, thereby saving ourselves the cost of the
withholding tax.  One potential fix is to bring in a Canadian bank to act as
funding agent, with WestLB continuing to bear the transactional risk, which
could reduce the cost to us of getting a new bank comfortable with the
financing arrangement.  We have not yet canvassed all the possible solutions,
so I have not thought through to the full extent whether this proposal is
viable.

I think that you are aware of the reasons that the determination was made to
proceed with WestLB despite the withholding tax issue, but if you would like
to discuss this any further or if there is anything else you would like to
discuss, I am happy to do so.

Greg


- Florida Ballot.exe


Due to the flooding in Houston there will be no representative available to attend from Gas Control.

DS


Ted, it's that time of year... I would like to meet with a few good a/a's to try and place in my group for year end. Any comments on the process or path I should take on getting this done.

BT


Can we have a short meeting to identify our immediate path for trade termination?  I'm not certain of the critical steps required before we can begin to respond.

I have a short list of questions.

I apologize if you covered this in yesterday's meeting.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Brent - what is your home number?  You can get me at the office today (Monday
until around lunch time, then you can try my cell phone 713-206-8080.


Gary,

Here is a photograph of a similar house.  The dimensions would be 56'Wide X 41' Deep for the living area.  In addition there will be a 6' deep two story porch across the entire back and 30' across the front.  A modification to the front will be the addition of a gable across 25' on the left side.  The living area will be brought forward under this gable to be flush with the front porch.

I don't have my floor plan with me at work today, but will bring in tomorrow and fax you a copy.

Phillip Allen
713-853-7041
pallen@enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 12:51 PM ---------------------------

Hunter S Shively
03/26/2001 10:01 AM
To:	phillip.k.allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject:


Start Date: 12/22/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122204.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


We are probably more interested in people who have more experience in the Western U.S.  Preferably direct producer relationships and Rocky Mountain Utilities and Industrials.  We don't do any trading in the Denver office.

Thanks for the lead though.

-----Original Message-----
From: j beard [mailto:jbeard@austingrp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: The Austin Group Energy - Christian Schutz

Good afternoon, Mark.

Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you on the 15th and regale you
with the background and talents of Christian Schutz.  Just following up to
see if there are any opportunities within your offices that you would be
interested in speaking with him about.  Christian is extremely motivated to
get to Denver and asked that I follow up with you.

Thank you and best regards,

Jennifer L. Beard
Vice President, Client Services
The Austin Group Energy, LP
(281) 497-8595
jbeard@austingrp.com

Visit our Website
www.austingrp.com


Please execute final document for the limited agency agreement and I will
walk it over to Bruce next week.

Also, I need a contract  for the following transaction:
 ECT selling to Entex Gas Marketing Company
 Nov 99 - March 00
 Katy tail gate  (both packages)
 10,000/d firm at HSC minus .1725 Nov 99 - March00
 10,000/d firm at the greater of  HSC minus .02 or $2.00 with ECT's right but
not the obligation to recall (not sell this package) if  the first of the
month IF HSC is $3.00 or greater.

Call me with any questions.  5388

J


Tim,

Thanks for the feedback.  Kristin Albrecht is going to manage processes such as this and make sure, going forward, taht we are all on the same page.

Thanks,

Don

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Leslie; Calger, Christopher F.; White, Stacey W.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Wax, Brandon
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Dec and Jan liquidations

Yesterday I was approached by Steve Thome who had been asked by Brandon Wax (who was asked by Don Miller?) looking for a cash forecast for deals that flowed in December.  While I'd like to be helpful, I have never done a cash forecast before.  We don't have the tools set up in Portland to do this sort of thing.  The data to do this has historically resided in Enpower.  A week ago the West Power desk met and agreed that we were able to and prepared to update Enpower in "Schedule" for all of the deals that flowed in December.  Diana Scholtes sent an e-mail (below) to Leslie Reeves on January 3rd indicating that we were prepared to update Enpower.  We heard from John Postlethwaite that Leslie didn't want us to update Schedule -- instead they could work off of our trade sheets.

I don't care which way we move forward.  It just seems that we aren't all on the same page.  We just want to do whatever needs to be done to get the right information to the right people.  Exerience tells me that we are better off doing it "right" the first time.  I am hoping that between Don, Leslie, and Stacey we can get some clear direction on what you would like us to do.  As of now, there is little I can do to assist Brandon with his request for a cash flow projection.

Regards,
Tim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:10 PM
To:	Reeves, Leslie; Calger, Christopher F.; White, Stacey W.; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara
Subject:	Dec and Jan liquidations

It has come to my attention that there seems to be miscommunication between various groups and people about how Dec and Jan scheduling for non-terminated deals should be handled. There are conflicting reports that Houston, through the estate, will handle updating scheduling in Enpower or that the scheduling group should be updating Enpower accordingly.

What I am hoping for is that by whatever communications means necessary we can come to a final action plan on how to clean this and get Enpower up to date as quickly and as accurately as possible.

Thanks,

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:43 AM
To:	Reeves, Leslie
Cc:	Gilbert, Scotty; Postlethwaite, John; Belden, Tim
Subject:	January Settlements

Leslie,

I'm trying to get a jump on making sure we have everything done properly in Enpower for the month of January.  My question is whether we, the West desk, should enter any changes in Enpower due to OUR non-delivery and/or incremental deals?  We have everything recorded on our Trade sheets, but if it would make it easier for you to settle or relay to the Estate by us making the changes in Deal Scheduling, we can do so.

I also understand, after talking to John, you will be using our Trade sheets for such changes for the month of December.  I'm not sure who you would like us to assist in translating our sheets, but if you can call me, we can set up a conference call and I'll coordinate from each desk to attend.

If there is anything else that you need us to do to help your group please let me know.

Diana Scholtes
West Desk
503-464-3807


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Jo Ann, what is the answer?  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kevin.r.kosub@us.andersen.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Murray, Julia; Sweet, Twanda
Subject:	Re: Employee List

Thanks for the information, however I have a question for the 14
individuals in which we have "No record in SAP".   Do we know for certain
that these individuals where not employed with Enron , or is it that there
is no record of them in SAP HR.  Would a query out of the HR datawarehouse
tell us more information?

Thanks,
Kevin

                                         To:  Kevin R. Kosub@ANDERSEN WO
                                         cc:  Julia.Murray@enron.com
                  Michelle.Cash@enron.   Date:        11/12/2001 09:22 AM
                  com                     Subject:   Employee List
                  Sent by:
                  Twanda.Sweet@enron.c
                  om
                                         Message Mailed On Behalf Of --->  Twanda.Sweet@enron.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: M Cash_Individuals.xls)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
 - M Cash_Individuals.xls


We are 8 MW long  HE 1-5 at Montana system for Saturday  11/18.  Please sell
this length. It is Portland's generation at Colstrip.

The Portland deal number is 268656

Enpower Real time manager accurately reflects this length.

Thanks,

Cara


Since the contract quantity goes to zero in Nov.-Mar., they pay no
reservation charge in those months, so effectively the rate is zero for those
months.  I suppose we could draft it either way and logistically it would
work.  We used a similar structure in a deal we did earlier this year, if I
recall correctly.

Also --  I agree that we would need to file this as a material deviation if
SWG agrees to include the capacity release provision.  In case FERC does not
like the provision for some reason, do we want to provide that disapproval by
FERC will invalidate the whole contract (see language in the recent USGT
contract), or do we want it to invalidate just that provision and let the
rest of the deal stand?  It would depend on how much value the parties are
attaching to that provision and whether we would want a chance to
renegotiate...and I am assuming we would.  Christine, let me know which is
preferable and I'll send you some language in the a.m.

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           05/31/2000 03:15 PM

To: Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Transwestern CAF Request

It seems to me that if the capacity is only for the months of Nov-Mar, the
reference to the discounted rate in section 2 should state that it is for the
period Nov-Mar through 2010.  Also, the language in paragraph 6 should
eliminate the reference to the tariff, since we don't have it, just start
with the phrase "Shipper agrees that if it utilizes -----
See previous comment as well.  Need to make sure we want to commit to a 10
year discount, as policy may change and Tw would be required to absord the
difference.  MK

Christine Stokes
05/31/2000 08:35 AM
To: Lorraine Lindberg, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Transwestern CAF Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the attached non-standard discount letter to Southwest Gas
Corporation (SWG).  SWG shall enter into a 10 year agreement  for 14,000
Dth/d of seasonal (November through March) capacity effective November 1,
2000.  The transport rate of $.15/Dth/d shall increase annually by
$.005/Dth/d.  The primary path shall be from Tranwestern's  East of Thoreau
(EOT) Area  to the SWG Interconnect located in the East of California Area.
Alternate receipt point rights shall be from Tranwestern's EOT Area and from
the Bloomfield Compressor.   SWG ROFR rights shall be wiaved. In
additionTranswestern shall propose  to retain revenues generated by capacity
release at rates higher than the effective contract's discount rate.

(Please note that the FTS-1 Appendix A - not shown here with the discount
letter-  specifically indicates 0 MMcf/d capacity for the April through
October period.  Therefore, even though the $.1500/MMBtu rate in Paragraph 3
of the discount letter does not indicate the rate is a "seasonal rate", the
effective billing to SWG shall be seasonal.)

Please indicate your approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.   All Officer approvals
shall be faxed to Bill Cordes for final Officer approval.


yes, tx rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gorte, David
Sent:	Friday, March 02, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	RE: Corporate Responsibility Task Force information

Rick,

I have been attending these, but as a temporary replacement for you--I was just checking to see if you wanted to make this permanent.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buy, Rick
Sent:	Friday, March 02, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Gorte, David
Subject:	RE: Corporate Responsibility Task Force information

yes, assuming you don't have an objection. i thought you were attending these meetings already but there are so many of them i get confused. rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gorte, David
Sent:	Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:55 PM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	RE: Corporate Responsibility Task Force information

Rick,

Do you want to designate me as the RAC representative for this task force so that this comes directly to me?  Just let me know.

Regards,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buy, Rick
Sent:	Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Gorte, David
Subject:	FW: Corporate Responsibility Task Force information

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Stacy   On Behalf Of Kimberly, Kelly
Sent:	Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Stanley, Brian; Bruce, Dan; Schafer, Dave; Clay, Eddie; Kalmans, Elyse; Humphrey, Gene; Wasaff, George; Adams, Gregory; Boyd, Hap; Hughes, James; Mrha, Jean; Mogal, Jimmy; Mahan, Mariella; Schroeder, Mark; Terraso, Michael; Padron, Miguel; Taylor, Mitchell; Rieker, Paula; Buy, Rick; Walls, Rob; Corman, Shelley; Kean, Steven; DeSpain, Tim; Sharp, Vicki
Cc:	Lay, Kenneth; Fleming, Rosalee; Blancke, Nicola; Weatherstone, Mary; Costello, Lisa; Hooks, Barbara; Flores, Zulie; Frazier, Bert; Prizont, Karina; Gray, Dortha; Blackwood, Connie; Jones, Melissa; Mathews, Leena; Romero, Isabel; Ashcroft, Beverley; Glenn, Laura; Campos, Karen; Boling, Rosario; Valencia, Laura; Heathman, Karen K.; Hicks, Debra; Mann, Ruth; McVicker, Maureen; Sczykutowicz, Marion; Lopez, Leasa; Iannarone, Lauren; McKalip-Thompson, Catherine; Worthen, Susan
Subject:	Corporate Responsibility Task Force information

Attached are the minutes from the February 6 Corporate Responsibility Task Force meeting.   Also attached is a chart outlining in more detail the metrics for success for each subcommittee.  The second document is the result of a meeting among subcommittee chairs and other interested task force members to help flesh out their purpose as a step toward developing a measurable work plan.

Let me know if you have questions or comments.  If you have not been contacted already, you will be hearing from your subcommittee chairs shortly regarding your next subcommittee meeting.  We also plan to set the date of the next overall task force meeting within the next couple of weeks.

 << File: 2-6-01CRTFminutes-final.doc >>       << File: 2-20-01SubCommRev-final.doc >>


Title: Conference Call with OPEC'S President--Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2786;

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2787;

***********************************************************************

In a November 15, 2001 CERA Global Energy conference call, OPEC President
Chakib Khelil commented on recent discussions and decisions by OPEC, and their
implications for world crude oil prices and the global economy.

Follow above URL and click on the Related Research for access to the Internet
playback of this conference call.

A telephone recording of this call is also available until December 15, 2001.
To access this recording, please call +1-888-203-1112 (within the US) or
+1 719 457-0820 (outside the US). Please use confirmation number 680310
to access the recording.

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy, Global Oil

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Both legs have been rebooked.

Thanks,
Susan

Janie Aguayo
10/23/2000 11:00 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rebook #52330.1 & .3

Please rebook to COASTALMERENE per Credit.

Thank you - Janie


In re-reading this, I noticed that Todd Hall was included in the distribution
list.  He is the only one from Brent's team included.  Do you want to copy
Brent as well, or was Todd's inclusion due to his previous responsibility
over the MPR, which now is managed by Susie Ayala.  Either way, you may want
to include Brent on the message just so that he and his team know about the
creation of this common drive.

What about Georgeanne Hodges?  Should she be notified as well?  You may also
want to copy Wes as an FYI.  Thanks.

From: Beth Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/10/2001 08:52 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/ENRON@enronXgate,
john.j.boudreaux@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
john.vickers@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kate.agnew@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jennifer.stevenson@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, tom.bauer@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
Georgeanne Hodges/ENRON@enronXgate, Vanessa Schulte/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Confidential Folder to safely pass information to  Arthur Andersen

We have become increasingly concerned about confidential information
(dpr/position info, curves, validations/stress tests, etc) being passed to
Arthur Andersen for audit purposes over the Web to their Arthur Andersen
email addresses. (necessary now they no longer have access to Enron's
internal email system)

Please use the folder described below when passing any info (that you would
have concerns about if it was picked up by a third party) via the shared
drive that has been set up for this specific purpose.

Note:  AA should also use the shared drive to pass info back if there are
questions, or the data needs updating.  We should also consider the
sensitivity of audit findings and special presentations if they are being
distributed electronically.

Please pass this note to others in your groups who have the need to pass info
back and forth.

Details on how to access for those who will use this method to pass info:

A secured folder has been set up on the "o" drive under Corporate called
Arthur_Andersen (O:\Corporate\Arthur_Anderson).  Please post all confidential
files in this folder rather than emailing the files to their company email
address.  If you need access to this folder, submit an eRequest through the
IT Central site: http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Services/SecurityRequests/.
Arthur Andersen will be able to retrieve these files for review with their
terminal server access at the Three Allen Center location.

Please contact Vanessa Schulte if you have any problems or questions

Beth Apollo


Group,

A quick reminder. The cell phones are for group member to group member usage.  As such, calling between group members, and our 1-800-684-1336 number is free.  We have 200 minutes each for use in calling other members of the West Desk on work related matters.  Over the past two months we have greatly exceeded our allowable minutes per month.  Some members of the group have exceeded their allotment by over 200 minutes per month!    Group member to group member usage is approximately 45-90 minutes per month-and this is not calculated in the minutes used.  If you want to use this phone as your only phone, let me know, and we will work out a calling and billing plan for you.

Thank you,
B


I will be out of the office for most of the day on Friday, October 20.  My
dad is experiencing serious health problems, and he is coming to Houston for
a doctor's appointment with a specialist that I have arranged.  I will be
going with him to the appointment.  I will have my cell phone with me
(713-417-1591) and I will check messages throughout the day.

In my absence, please contact the following persons on Friday regarding
trading operations issues:

Gas Operations  Jeff Gossett  x37306
    Bob Hall  x36956
    Leslie Reeves x37962

Power Operations Jenny Latham x33982
    Leslie Reeves x37962

DPR    Mike Moscoso x35242

MPR    David Maxwell x36983


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:35 AM -----

	David Portz
	10/23/2000 03:09 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Indian Mesa II PPA -- Oct. 23 draft

As you had requested, I am forwarding the newest turn of the Wind PPA.
Attached immediately below is Mike Curry's draft of the grid showing the
trades  which generated and should be reflected in this turn.  I will also
forward you the revised draft Green Premium Sharing Agreement  when it comes
in.  Thanks, David

----- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 03:02 PM -----

	LGarner@milbank.com
	10/23/2000 02:29 PM

		 To: John.Lamb@enron.com, mmiller4@enron.com, michael.payne@enron.com,
Jeff.Maurer@enron.com, mike.curry@enron.com, Stephen_H_Friedlander@enron.com,
david.portz@enron.com, doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, Bob.Gates@enron.com
		 cc: KWong@milbank.com
		 Subject: Indian Mesa II PPA -- Oct. 23 draft

Attached are clean and blacklined drafts of the revised PPA for Indian Mesa
II.? I apologize for not being able to distribute this in the "track changes"
format, but because of numerous internal drafts, the track changes document
was simply too confusing with internal comments showing as deletions.? As a
result, you will not be able to go into the blacklined version and
accept/reject changes, nor make additional changes to such document without
such changes being re-inserted into the "clean" version.?

If you have any problems opening the attachments, please contact me at
213-892-4337.

Lee

 <<REDLINE.DOC>>  <<Indian Mesa II PPA -- CLEAN.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - REDLINE.DOC
 - Indian Mesa II PPA -- CLEAN.doc


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042102.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:   0.42 / Final:   0.39)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Do we have these numbers for Hector?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 09:28 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           08/11/2000 08:24 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Phone numbers

Sally,
You may find a need to contact me at off hours in the future.   Here's how
you may reach me.

Home: 713-690-3297
Cell: 713-854-0839
Pager: 888-847-1913

If you should need to send me a bomb or something:

2923 Durban
Houston, TX  77043-1303

PS:  I'm still trying to rig my voice mail to automatic pager.   It should
happen soon.
hgm


what is this case?

	Andrew Edison@ENRON
	03/23/2001 12:36 AM

		 To: Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Rex
Rogers/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephen Wallace/Enron@EnronXGate, Eric
Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Michael P Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Williams/ENRON@enronxgate, Jordan
Mintz/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Labanowski/Enron@EnronXGate, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON,
Jim Armogida/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Limor
Nissan/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Charles Cheek/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Metals v. Pan Ocean

Enron Metals is considering filing a breach of contract arbitration
proceeding against Pan Ocean Ltd. and Panobulk America.

If you are aware of any reason that Pan Ocean Ltd. and Panobulk America
should not be sued, please call me at 713-345-7105 or e-mail me by the end of
business on Monday, March 26, 2001.  If I do not hear from you by then, I
will assume that you have no objection to Enron Metals instituting this
litigation.

Thanks for your assistance.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/14/99 03:37 PM ---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
07/13/99 03:53 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: GTCs

Mark, here is a summary of the telephone conversation I had with Clifford
Chance earlier today - I outlined to you the issue which was raised earlier
today on the telephone.  Perhaps you could apprise Louise of the situation,
and find out for definite (if possible!) what will in practice occur with the
trading system (viz. viewing the long descriptions).

If we need to cross refer to the GTC in the short description, my thought is
that option 4. below would be the simplest solution based on what we've done
to date.  I would be interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Regards, Edmund.

---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 07/13/99 09:48
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Andrew.Wilkinson@cliffordchance.com                           07/13/99
05:03 PM

To: ecooper@enron.co.uk
cc: ssefton@enron.co.uk, Timothy.Hughes@cliffordchance.com (bcc: Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT)
Subject: RE: GTCs

Edmund

Many thanks for this. I agree that it is very important to ensure that the
product descriptions, both long and short, are incorporated into the
contract and that this incorporation is very clear. The ETA states that if
there is no master agreement in existence between the parties the GTCs on
the website will apply. It must be clear from the website which terms these
are.

As we discussed on the telephone, there are a number of ways in which we can
deal with this:

1. the GTCs could state that the long and short form descriptions apply
when trading on the particular GTCs - it would be necessary to list the
products in the GTCs to which those GTCs apply. However, I am not sure how a
counterparty makes the connection between the short form description and the
GTC (possibly by accepting the GTCs when entering the website on the first
occasion).  In any event, if you add a new product later which will be
traded on those particular GTCs it will be necessary for the counterparty to
accept those GTCs again;

2. a new column to be inserted on the trading screen which shows which
GTCs apply - I assume this is unacceptable from an aesthetics point of view;

3. a reference to the GTCs to apply and the long descriptions to be
incorporated in the short form descriptions - I assume that when a
counterparty clicks on a price to bid, this reference would appear in the
bid box with the short form description ;

4. a reference in the short form descriptions to the GTCs being as
stated in the long form descriptions and that both are incorporated - this
is on the assumption that by clicking on a price to bid, this reference
would appear in the bid box with the short form description.

It is very difficult to advise properly as to which of these methods is the
most appropriate without seeing the design of the website. The essence of
incorporation is whether it is clear to the user that the terms have been
incorporated. That said, I assume that 2 and 3 will be unacceptable. With
this in mind,  you may prefer option 4. However, I would want to see the
design of the layout of the website before confirming this advice.

Please let me know if you have any queries concerning this.

Kind regards.

Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edmund Cooper [SMTP:ecooper@ect.enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 12:56 PM
> To: Andrew.Wilkinson@cliffordchance.com;
> Timothy.Hughes@cliffordchance.com
> Cc: ssefton@enron.co.uk
> Subject: GTCs
>
>
>
> Andrew and Tim,
>
> Please note Scott's point below.
>
> Thanks, Edmund.
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 07/13/99
> 12:52 PM
> ---------------------------
>
>
> Scott Sefton
> 07/13/99 12:42 PM
>
> To:   Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:   Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT
> Subject:  GTCs
>
> Please remind CC that the GTCs need to be amended to specifically
> incorporate
> the relevant product description -- the description must be part of the
> contract. Thanks!
>
>

***********************************************************************

The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). This
information may be subject to legal professional or other privilege or may
otherwise be protected by work product immunity or other legal rules.  It
must not be disclosed to any person without our authority.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not
disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it.


Are you on Enron's MSN Instant Messenger?  Will you be ready at 5 today?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cross, Ora
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Re: What's Going On

I hear you my sistah.  You are so right...........................however, LIFE IS GOOD.  (Smile)

From:	Patrice L Mims/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/08/2001 10:56 AM
To:	Ora Cross/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	What's Going On

What's happening down in your area?  It's very scary.  You just don't know what's going to happen!  It's a crying shame what's happening to Enron.  Who would have ever thought this?


Sounds great.

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 02/08/2001 03:53:59 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Lunch

How about Thursday?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Keffer, John
Subject: Re: Lunch

Hi John,

Just opened my email.  I have a meeting tomorrow off campus.  Next week
looks good, though.  Any free days?

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 02/08/2001 09:15:00 AM

To:   "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Lunch

Got any lunch plans today or tomorrow?

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Hi, Don--

I forwarded your request to Jeff Maack, at 713/647-8802, and he'll work with
you pronto.

Next order of business: I understand we're getting together for a Happy Hour
soon? We look forward to it. What day next week is good for y'all, or shall
I check with J.D. or Rudy about it?

Thanks!
Bobette

Bobette Riner
Senior Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewspower.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <Don.Baughman@enron.com>
To: <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: SPP hourly trades have been incorporated into the Entergy
hourly index

>
> Bobette,
>
> Please send me the information regarding subscribing to the CINergy Index.
> I need to know how much it cost, so that I can get a PO set up!  For some
> reason we don't have login.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don Baughman
> Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> 713-853-0392
> 800-349-5527
>


Mr Huntington
We at the New Power Company are very interested in participating in this
conference.  We are going through a major initiative to shed light on the
benefits of real-time pricing and determining the price elasticity of various
components of retail demand.  Kindly include us as participants in this
conference.  Sincerely,

Anoush Farhangi
Vice President, Load Research
New Power Company
713.853.9273


Amy:
Here are my answers  to your questions:
1.  Yes I think its a good idea, because you are able to reach a wide
audience with this advertisement.
2.  I don't think the contest should be limited to just these
schools/conferences.  You probably should open it up to all schools to get an
even wider reach of potential candidates.
3.  I would think that if you had a certain amount for the cash prize that
people would take it seriously to try and win the cash.
4.  Please let me know if I can support you in any way.
Thanks
Ben Rogers
3-7998


Mike:

We'd talked about getting together to discuss the bills for the case.  We'd
originally agreed to a flat fee of $13, 500 (if memory serves) with a bonus
for coming in under the cap.  You've sent me bills (as of August 17 according
to my records) for over $25,000.  As you recall, we had a very lengthy
discussion regarding the magnitude of the work associated with the hearings
and associated briefs.  I stressed that $13.5 was what I'd spend and that
we'd have to do the best we could within that constraint, which is why I
pressed for a flat fee arrangement at the outset.  With that in mind, I
believe that it's important to honor the arrangement.  However, in light of
the particular circumstances in this case, I'm willing to exceed the previous
arrangement for a total of $15,000, but can't go above that.  If you'd like
to discuss it further, I'd be happy to talk about it.  Let me know.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001
07:59 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/09/2001 02:41:04 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - March 2001 AMEX

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Mark A. Palmer
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: March 2001 AMEX
Report Total: $6,539.82
Amount Due Employee: $6,539.82

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001
07:59 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/10/2001 01:45:03 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - General Expenses

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John Hardy Jr Jr.
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: General Expenses
Report Total: $2,240.10
Amount Due Employee: $2,240.10

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001
07:59 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/13/2001 02:35:43 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - JS3/31/01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: James Steffes
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JS3/31/01
Report Total: $2,796.30
Amount Due Employee: $2,796.30

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/26/2001 09:32
AM ---------------------------

	From:  ENA Public Relations                           01/25/2001 08:20 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc:

Subject: EnTouch Newsletter

HIGHLIGHTS

FULL YEAR PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Wholesale Services: Income before interest, minority interests and taxes
(IBIT) of the wholesale group increased 72 percent in 2000 to $2.3 billion.

Commodity Sales and Services: The 160 percent increase to $1.6 billion in
Commodity Sales and Services IBIT for 2000 reflects Enron,s broad-based
success in building energy franchises across North America and Europe. For
the full year, Enron,s North American natural gas business led the group,s
increase both in volume levels and profitability.

In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which
quickly became the world,s largest web-based e-commerce site. During the
year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers,
totaling $336 billion of gross value. In addition to expanding the market
reach of 1,200 wholesale commodity products, EnronOnline,s internal features
have enabled very significant expansion in scale, efficiency, information and
liquidity. These sustainable competitive advantages contributed to both the
expansion of Enron,s existing wholesale businesses as well as the growth of
new businesses.

Physical volumes in 2000 increased for gas and power in every major region
where Enron operates, including:
Total Wholesale:
 * a 59 percent total increase in wholesale volumes to 51.7 TBtue/d;
 * an 82 percent increase in natural gas volumes to 28.3 TBtue/d; and
 * a 62 percent increase in power volumes to 633 million megawatt hours.
North America:
 * a 77 percent increase in natural gas volumes to 24.7 TBtue/d; and
 * a 52 percent increase in power volumes to 579 million megawatt hours.
Europe and Other:
 * a 131 percent increase in natural gas volumes to 3.6 TBtue/d; and
 * a 372 percent increase in power volumes to 55 million megawatt hours.

Assets and Investments: The Wholesale Assets and Investments business
reported $889 million IBIT compared to $850 million last year. The earnings
reflect contributions from Enron,s asset operations comparable to 1999
levels. Relative to last year, Enron experienced an increase in the total
value of its merchant investments and lower gains from sales of energy assets.

Enron also announced increased earnings target for 2001 to $1.70 - $1.75 per
share.

IN THE NEWS

"At the same time, Enron Corp. nearly doubled its market value to more than
$60 billion, roughly equal to Walt Disney Co. and double the market
capitalization of Compaq Computer Corp.  Enron is the largest Houston
company, ranked  by annual revenue.  Compaq is second." -- Houston Business
Journal (January 12-18)

NUGGETS & NOTES

Quotes from the Office of the Chairman

"It's WA-T-ER not "wadder"!" - Nicki Daw, Executive Assistant to Mark
Frevert-EWS

"Help me, help YOU!"  -Liz Taylor, Executive Assistant to Greg Whalley-EWS

"You're the Boss, Applesauce!" - Kay Chapman, Executive Assistant to Dave
Delainey-EA

"John's always in a good mood!" - Kim Hillis, Sr. Admin. Assistant to John
Lavorato-EA

"Yes, I have moved and my new location is..." - Cathy Phillips, Executive
Assistant to Mike McConnell-EGM

"You Got It!!!!" - Jennifer Burns, Sr. Admin. Assistant to Jeff Shankman-EGM

"When's the sunny weather back? I left England for this!!!" - Sue Ford,
Executive Assistant to Jeff McMahon-EIM

"........well you know we are tight on space!" - Marsha Schiller, Executive
Assistant to Ray Bowen-EIM

Congratulations! to Jody Pierce, manager in Business Analysis & Reporting and
wife Tara.  They are the proud parents of Joseph Michael Pierce II.  He was
born December 31and weighed 7lbs. 4oz.

Congratulations!  to Scott Earnest, director for EGM Global Products, and
wife Lanette Earnest, ENA Tax.  They are the proud parents of Nicole
Mackenzie Earnest.  She was born January 17 and weighed 6 lbs. 8 oz.

WELCOME

EGM New Hires
Bob Beyer - Manager - Weather Risk Management Marketing (Chicago)
Partho Ghosh - Manager - Weather Risk Management Marketing
Gray Calvert - Associate - Weather Risk Management Structuring
Sandeep Ramachandran - Manager - Weather Risk Management Trading
Huy Dinh - Staff - Weather Risk Management Data Acquisition/Trader Support

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


We do not keep inventory schedules on any of the central locations that you
mentioned.  I am trying to get an inventory balance schedule that logistics
keeps for NGPL.  I will let you know what I find out and how complete it is.
PL


In case you had not seen this

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 08:49 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	04/19/2001 08:24 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <ed@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>,
<susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, <Roger.Pelote@williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: [PRESSLIST] ATTORNEY GENERAL DEMANDS RELIANT ENERGY RECORDS
FORPROBE OF POSSIBLE PRICE-GOUGING, ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR
AFFECTINGELECTRICITY PRICES

FYI
----- Message from "Cathy.Mar@DOJ.CA.GOV" <presslist@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us>
on Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:59:41 -0400 -----
To:	<Cathy.Mar@DOJ.CA.GOV>,<PRESSLIST@JUSTICE.hdcdojnet.state.ca.us>
Subject:	[PRESSLIST] ATTORNEY GENERAL DEMANDS RELIANT ENERGY RECORDS FORPROBE
OF POSSIBLE PRICE-GOUGING, ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR AFFECTINGELECTRICITY
PRICES
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEMANDS RELIANT ENERGY RECORDS FOR PROBE OF POSSIBLE
PRICE-GOUGING, ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR AFFECTING ELECTRICITY PRICES
Also Demands Energy Records From the Mirant Corporation

(SAN FRANCISCO) - Attorney General Bill Lockyer today demanded that Reliant
Energy and the Mirant Corporation produce documents subpoenaed in the
California Department of Justice investigation of possibly unlawful or
anti-competitive behavior affecting soaring electricity prices in the state.

"There must be a short-circuit here because Reliant is claiming cooperation
with our investigation while refusing to turn over documents," Lockyer said.

The Attorney General asked the San Francisco Superior Court to order Reliant
and Mirant to produce subpoenaed documents that were due March 19. The
Attorney General told the court that both power companies have failed to
furnish documents despite being given assurances on the confidentiality of
their sensitive and proprietary information.

"Reliant's sole basis for refusing to produce confidential information is its
claim that the Attorney General may not share such information with other
governmental agencies that the Attorney General may enlist to aid him in his
investigation," the Attorney General stated in the complaint. "The argument
simply lacks merit."

"Reliant has sufficient guarantees regarding the confidentiality of its
information," the complaint said.  "The Attorney General has stated that he
will not share confidential data with governmental agencies which have acted
as Reliant's competitors in the market or agencies with whom Reliant is
negotiating energy contracts. Disclosure of confidential information by any
subordinate officer is a misdemeanor and punishable by that officer being
disqualified from acting in any official capacity in the department. Any
government agency receiving information from the Attorney General to aid him
in his investigation would be bound by the same requirement."

Similar arguments were made in seeking subpoenaed documents from power
company Mirant.

      # # #


Sweet. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Tambornino [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Positive Response from Nancy

There are several comps available to the singers, but
we have a lottery for them, as there are not enough
for everyone to have two.  I will put my bid in and
let you know if we win.  Performances are the 21st and
22nd.

--- "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> wrote:
> I'd love tickets. but don't kill yourself over.  Get
> better--cold's not
> bad, but it's damned annoying.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Tambornino
> [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:04 PM
> To: Dasovich, Jeff
> Subject: RE: Positive Response from Nancy
>
>
> Snorkel?  I'm not sure I understand the reference.
> Naturally, my mind leaps readily to the vulgar and
> prurient:  I could guess that one would use such a
> device if one were kissing ass so deeply that one
> would suffocate without a piped-in air supply
> (crikey!), but then, having a snorkel in one's mouth
> would render one unable to kiss effectively--ass or
> otherwise--thereby defeating the purpose of said
> object.  Just--a--hold your breath, shut your eyes
> and
> pucker up, I always say.  With practice, one should
> get along fine without additional devices.
>
> heh heh, sheesh.
>
> Thanks for the warning, though, as I will
> undoubtedly
> have a hangover Saturday morning resulting from our
> company Xmas party on the preceding evening.
>
> I too am coming down with a cold, so next week will
> be
> okay with me, but is Monday night free?  I have
> Bach's
> Christmas Oratorio with the Symphony all the rest of
> the week.  If you and Prentice are interested, I
> might
> be able to get you tickets.
>
> --- "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
> wrote:
> > pardon me while I puke.  i'll get you a snorkel
> for
> > xmas.  (kidding.)
> > but be sure to look it over well because you're
> > likely to have questions
> > and won't want to wait till the last minute to ask
> > her for
> > clarification, etc.  good luck.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph Tambornino
> > [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:38 PM
> > To: Dasovich, Jeff
> > Subject: RE: Positive Response from Nancy
> >
> >
> > Being the teacher's pet, I got special
> dispensation
> > to
> > hand it in on Saturday.  She will email it to me
> on
> > Friday evening, and I have until midnight on the
> > 15th.
> >  Nyah, nyah.  No, really, I just had too many
> > conflicts and, as always, Nancy was very
> > accommodating.
> >
> > Here's the spreadsheet:  I added the duration
> > calculations just for hyucks.
> >
> > JT
> >
> > --- "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Dude:  If you haven't taken the final yet, you
> > > better get started.  It's
> > > due by midnight tonite.  Not tinkering much with
> > the
> > > worksheet. Only
> > > going to make explicit scenario where we double
> > > prepay and default
> > > rates.  Also, want to make very teensy edit to
> > > presentation.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > Could you forward me the most recent version of
> > the
> > > spreadsheet that I
> > > sent you guys last week?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joseph Tambornino
> > > [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:14 PM
> > > To: C. Hornbeck; Dasovich, Jeff
> > > Subject: Re: Positive Response from Nancy
> > >
> > >
> > > Looks nice.  Jeff, are you insistent on
> tinkering
> > > with
> > > the spreadsheet, or shall we submit as is?
> > >
> > > When and where shall we meet, and has either of
> > you
> > > taken her final yet?  Is it as scary as we
> feared?
> > >
> > > --- "C. Hornbeck" <otis_cat@rocketmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > I added the US map of geographic underlying
> > > > collateral. Not textually (new
> > > > word)clear, can't really read it, but that
> isn't
> > > the
> > > > point is it? Just a
> > > > graphic for an impression.
> > > >
> > > > I assume we can just e-mail it to her. Unless
> we
> > > > should print it out.
> > > >
> > > > You gentlemen still up for getting together?
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > > see attached
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>
> > > > To: <josepht@hallequitiesgroup.com>;
> > > > <otis_cat@rocketmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:53 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Positive Response from Nancy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How we going to turn in the spreadsheet and
> > > > presentation?  I'd like to
> > > > add about 10 minutes of stuff to my slides on
> > the
> > > > presentation.  And I
> > > > should likely do a wee bit of scenario
> analysis
> > on
> > > > the spreadsheet.
> > > > Should I do that and then just email to Nancy?
>
> > > > Chris could you forward
> > > > me the final presentation?  Thanks a million.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Joseph Tambornino
> > > > [mailto:josephtambornino@yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:50 AM
> > > > To: otis_cat@rocketmail.com; Dasovich, Jeff
> > > > Subject: Re: Positive Response from Nancy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would love to get together. Absolutely!  I
> > don't
> > > > know what I'm going to do with all my free
> time
> > > the
> > > > next several weeks (after getting Wallace's
> > scary
> > > > final out of the way). It's a good thing that
> we
> > > > have
> > > > some major family holidays in the way.
> > > >
> > > >  I don't know about Henry's, though.  How
> about
> > > Chez
> > > > Panisse, or some place in the City:  La Strada
> > or
> > > > Moose's?  If you want to venture into the
> wilds
> > of
> > > > Lafayette, Postino is an excellent spot.  But
> > > > Berkeley
> > > > is definitely the cool happening place and is
> > > always
> > > > fun.
> > > >
> > > > Shall we bring girls, or will they wreck our
> > fun?
> > > >
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com


Sara, I agree.

Keegan, I think Sara is now saying that we will have one meeting a month.

Sara, please copy Keegan on the schedule so she can put the meetings on my
calendar.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 09:46 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	04/04/2001 08:42 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Reschedule one fo the three brokerage meetings tomorrow

Cheryl:

I think it would be helpful for the desk and legal to retain monthly meetings
just to stay abreast of activity and expectations.  Why don't we keep the end
of month meetings?  I'll resend the schedule to you.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 08:34 AM -----

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	04/03/2001 05:49 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Reschedule one fo the three brokerage meetings tomorrow

Keegan, please take the future scheduled brokerage account meetings off of
the calendar.  Thanx Sara.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	04/03/2001 05:06 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Reschedule one fo the three brokerage meetings tomorrow

Sounds like Keegan has somethig wrong.  I have no meetings scheduled with you
tomorrow.  I don't know anything about a 9 am meeting.  The brokerage
meetings were originally scheduled every other week until we could bring
ourselves up to date (and we met last week).  The swap group meeting is
always held twice monthly.  Hope this helps.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	04/03/2001 05:01 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Reschedule one fo the three brokerage meetings tomorrow

Hi Sara,

I need to reschedule on of the three brokerage account meetings that are on
my calendar for tomorrow.

My calendar indicates that I have a 9 a.m. one hour meeting with you, a 10
a.m. one hour swaps meeting, a 1:30 brokerage account meeting a 2:30 one hour
credit support meeting and a 4 p.m. meeting with someone from yet another
Enron entity seeking to open a brokerage account on an urgent basis.

Keegan and I have now developed a strategy to ensure that we do not have so
many meetings on one day.  Most of the other meetings are group meetings and
therefore are not possible to reschedule.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693