Hi!

                  Yes,  we were discussing your lending habits and everyone was calling me a fricken mouch!  Your like a legend around here.
We still need to get together and share some of your previous comments with Craig.  How are you?  I miss you and get regular updates about how you are doing from you know who.  Been to any exciting ports lately.   Any baby news?  Not much new around here - John Craig keeps us laughing.  Take care!

                                                                                Andy


Agreed.  Get me off this list
gba


The following filings by NYISO are pending at FERC:

	-  Filing to extend the expiration date for NYISO's Automated Mitigation Procedure to October 31, 2002, effective no later than November 1, 2001.  (Docket No. ER01-3155) Enron is filing a protest and also participating in drafting the Independent Power Producers of New York protest.

	- Filing to implement multi-hour block transactions in the NYISO Day-Ahead Market, effective on December 1, 2001. (Docket No. ER01-3147).  Enron is intervening in order to monitor this proceeding.

	- Compliance filing in ER01-2536 pursuant to FERC's Sept. 4 order requiring filing of revenue-neutral translation calculation of the in-city price cap into UCAP terms.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact either Howard Fromer (518.427.0531) or me.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


Sure--frankly I thought that we were covered.  Bill Bradford gave me the list
of invitees from credit.  Julia

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com

	Tana Jones@ECT
	05/15/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Letter of Credit Seminar - May 23, 2001

Would it be possible to ask some key people from our Credit Dept. to attend
this semiar?

	Julia Murray@ENRON
	Sent by: Carolyn George@ENRON
	05/15/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne
C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Lowry/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie
Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate, Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Lindeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Sarah
Bruck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, William S
Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Debbie R Brackett/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom
Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendi LeBrocq/Enron@EnronXGate, Nidia
Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica Espinoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Ken
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Carol North/Enron@EnronXGate, Aparna
Rajaram/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter of Credit Seminar - May 23, 2001

 Please mark your calendars.  Emory Ireland and Martin Weinstein of Foley &
Lardner will be conducting a presentation regarding the nuts and bolts of
Letters of Credit on Wednesday, May 23, 2001 from 8:45 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. in
EB5C2.  Please RSVP to Carolyn George at ext. 33439 or
carolyn.george@enron.com if you plan to attend.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


The most recent numbers


Small stuff is staggerd Choice Capacity from LDC, no problem. 10,000 and 8,000
packages appear to be winter supplies for C&I. As long as ENA buys monthly
capacity for C&I market that extra Choice capacity can't cover, we should be
OK.

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 03/15/2000 12:37:50 AM
Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com

To: Chris.Germany@enron.com, Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Capacity Expires

Jeff- Joann sent me this note showing CES capacity that expires 3/31/2000.
Except for the SST, it differs from what we discussed this week.
Please Review.
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron North America Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Joann Collins
 pic14068.pcx) 03/15/2000 10:38 AM

To:   Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  just FYI

 (Embedded
 image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic22645.pcx)
 to file:
 pic22245.pcx)

K#        Type      Market    Expiration Date           Volume    Comments
63281          SST       coh(various)         3/31/2000      134,710
 As discussed
62978          FTS       cpa8            3/31/2000      8000
63282          FTS       cgv10                3/31/2000      6
63283          FTS       cmd4&8          3/31/2000      46
63764          FTS       cpa8            3/31/2000      10000
65458          SST       coh3            3/31/2000      33

These contracts were term contracts since 10/1/99.

thanks
joann

 - pic14068.pcx
 - pic22245.pcx
 - pic22645.pcx


Attached is the TW weekly report for September 7, 2001.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Jan Moore
713-345-3858


Debra, I had to change from Chris to Janet McDaniel for one of your reviewers.  Please let me know
	if you have any concerns.  Thanks. Lynn


OK for me!

	Lisa Lees
	11/14/2000 02:41 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap - 2nd request

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type Mixed
Xylene Fin Swap.  Tom Moran has approved copying the profiles for the new
product type from the following:

 US Benzene Financial Swap CMAI Spot

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 15.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:30 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/13/2000 10:04 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap - 2nd request

Mark,

Please approve the attahced product.

Thanks,
---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/09/2000 09:29 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

Traders: Steve Elliott, Lee Jackson, Adam Metry

US MxXylene Swap  CMAI Spot               Aug-Oct00       USD/Gl-b

A US Mixed Xylene financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by the Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the Term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period;
provided that, if the Term of the Transaction is less than one calendar month
the Determination Period shall be the Term of the Transaction.  The Notional
Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty via the website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable.  The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.

The Term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Aug 2000
to the Termination Date of 31 Oct 2000.

The Index for a Determination Period shall be the mean of the average of the
high and low price in Cents/Gallons of Mixed Xylene published under the
headings &Prices for Period Ending [DATE]: United States: Mixed Xylene)8
under the caption &SPOT: Cents/Lb.8 in each issue of Chemical Market
Associates, Inc.,s Aromatics Market Report (Weekly) that reports prices
effective for such Determination Period. Notwithstanding the reference to
pounds in the caption mentioned above, the prices quoted for this product by
CMAI are in Cents/Gallon.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be gallons and
the volume shown shall be in total number of Barrels (42 US Gallons) per
month.

==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 03:36 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	12/15/2000 03:07 PM

		 To: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com, Mike_D_Smith@enron.com,
Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com, vsharp@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request to DOJ Investigation to Undertake CA Investigation

FYI re: DOJ/CA Situation.  I'm not sure what to make of this in light of the
upcoming change in the Administration, but I thought you would want to be
aware of it.  Also, although the focus appears to be generators, I would
assume that if DOJ elected to go forward andy investigation would be likely
to expand to include major marketers.  John

Friday December 15, 1:03 pm Eastern Time
Justice Dept Asked to Probe Power Crisis
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno has been asked to
investigate whether possible collusion and other illegal activities among
power generators are behind the huge jump in California's electricity and
natural gas prices.

``We are concerned that market power is being abused by generators in the
electricity market to inflate prices and gouge consumers,'' California
Democratic U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer and California State Senate President Pro
Tempore John Burton said in a letter to Reno late on Thursday.

``We request that the Department of Justice investigate potential collusion
and any other unlawful acts by generators in the electricity market,'' they
added.

They noted in the letter that one-fourth of the state's generating plants --
representing 11,000 megawatts of power -- were shut down last weekend,
allegedly for repairs or routine maintenance, when California citizens faced
rolling blackouts.

``Some have suggested that one reason for plant shutdowns is that in some
cases companies are selling natural gas they would otherwise use to operate
their plants at exorbitant prices on the natural gas market,'' they said.

If true, Boxer and Burton said it would explain some of the electricity
shortage problems and raise concern about irregular activity in the natural
gas market.

In a related action, they sent letters to power company executives asking
them to explain why their firms shut down generators while California faced
power shortages.

Wholesale electricity prices in the state have soared as high as $1,400 per
megawatt hour.

Boxer and Burton admitted time is running out for Reno to take action since a
new attorney general will take the helm of the Justice Department when
Republican George W. Bush assumes the presidency in late January.

``However, this crisis in upon us now,'' they said. ``I hope you will take
immediate steps to address this matter, thereby setting a strong example of
leadership for the new attorney general to follow.''

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Jimmy Glotfelty
Senior Electric Policy Advisor to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham
US Department of Energy
Washington, DC
202-586-7131

Email Notification:
Re:  Administration's electric
restructuring bill, evaluate the feasibility of a national electric grid,
help advise the administration on the steps necessary to help solve our
western electric
crisis, work with Congress, and help craft many other policies that will
positively impact the competitive electric industry.  This is a once in
a lifetime opportunity that I felt I could not pass up.
Formerly:
Director; Government Affairs
Calpine Corporation
700 Milam #800
Houston, TX 77002
Direct: 713-830-8633
Fax: 713-830-8871
Cell: 713-594-8153
jimmyg@calpine.com


Chris,
I'm sure there are some I missed.  I beleive some of these books have not
been used for quite some time.  Let me know what else you need from me.
Thanks.

DG


Rahil,

Attached for your review please find a draft of the above-referenced
Agreement.  Please pay special attention to the provisions in the Agreement
which have been highlighted or bracketed.  Please also fill in the blanks
(i.e. the missing definitions).  Feel free to call me with any comments or
questions at 3-9720.  Rhett Jackson in tax is looking into any possible issue
relating to the value added taxes.

Jason


There are no changes from my previous approvals for the two counterparties on
this list.


Yes, you are nuts!  I can't believe that you already have so many gingerbread
houses made.  The cookie exchange was fun - fudge is definitely the easy
route on that one.

I will get the recipe from home tonight and will e:mail it to you tomorrow.
-Sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 12/11/2000 11:19:35 AM
To: "Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: breakfast pizza

Hey--how was your weekend--fudge delivered?

Got my bake sale item done--an 18 layer cookie tower.  Have 9 houses baked
with 3 to go.

Now to show that I really have gone nuts--I thought I would cook breakfast
for the 2nd grade at school on Friday morning....can I have your breakfast
pizza recipe?  We all thought it was great and I think the kids will think
it is fun....

Thanks!

Cindy


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron wants to reschedule a meeting.

On   12/05/2000 02:30:00 PM CST
For   1 hour 30 minutes
With:   James Saunders/FGT/Enron (Chairperson)
  Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron (Invited)
  Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron (Invited)
  Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron (Invited)

Rod's - discuss ETS Structuring/Risk mgmt. Committee


Good catch, Joe.  I saw this on the plane today.  In my view, it underscores
something we have been discussing for several months: The growing scrutiny on
oil tanks/pipelines/trucks and our need to remain on top of this trend, etc.
SWD

	Joe Richards
	07/13/00 07:43 AM

		 To: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy, Robert Sanford, Gary Wright,
Steve Comstock/Remote/Eott@Eott, Jimmy Lee, Jim Coen/Houston/Eott@Eott, Cutty
Cunningham/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan Ralph, Steve Myers, Dan
Cole/Remote/Eott@Eott, Robin Border
		 cc:
		 Subject: Newspaper Article - Koch

Please see attached article in today's Houston Chronicle

Thanks

Joe


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
03:58 PM ---------------------------

Anjam Ahmad
12/07/99 09:33 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 07/12/99 03:32 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  John Sherriff                           07/12/99 03:10 PM

Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: ECT Europe, Enron Executive Committee, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monte L
Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick L
Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

We are pleased to announce the formation of the Credit Markets Group which is
responsible for developing innovative products to better manage the risk of
our internal credit portfolio as well as, looking  for opportunities to
provide third party credit protection.  Initially, we will be making markets
in bankruptcy protection on reference credits which are currently in our
portfolio but we expect to add additional credit products and reference
credits very quickly.

The team will utilise EnronOnline as its primary trade execution tool,
looking to quickly build market share by capturing the eyes of our current
counterparts.  Simultaneously,  we will launch an external web site focused
on credit protection where potential customers will have access to real time
prices and filter on specific reference credits as well as, access to credit
models and research papers on effective credit risk management.  Utilising
e-commerce business principles, we expect to aggressively claim the space for
corporate credit protection.  We expect to make a public announcement about
these new products in late January.

In order to effectively access the global market for credit protection, the
group will be based in London with an initial local desk set up in Houston as
well.  Bryan Seyfried will be transitioning out of RAC, where he was
responsible for the Trading Controls and Research teams in Europe, to lead
the group and he will report to me.


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020116-DENWW.XLS


I Will Send you the "Wire Confirmation" later.

MC


chk email for demand-reduction details.  thx, jeff


Suzanne,

I left the response (which is a letter from Siemens Westinghouse) on the part
of my desk which is next to the window.  I MAY have put it in a file folder
labeled "Westinghouse".  The letter references a letter we sent to them in
the first line.  Please find the letter and fax to Bill.  Thanks a bunch.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 07:06
AM ---------------------------

Bill Fox@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/22/2000 06:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Westinghouse claim/Gleason

Kay:  Thanks for forwarding this letter.  My fax number is 713 646-6597 to
get a copy of  the Westinghouse response.

bill fox

To: Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Westinghouse claim/Gleason

Bill,

I'm attaching an electronic copy of the letter we sent to Westinghouse.  If
you email me your fax number, I'll fax you their response.

Thanks,

Kay


Steve,
 Here is the complaint you requested.  We are searching the court
files to see if a TRO was issued.
 <<SCEvPXcomplaint.pdf>>
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - SCEvPXcomplaint.pdf


Interesting idea!  Hopefully we can find a simpler approach, but I don't see
any inherent problem with something like that if it seems to make the most
financial sense.  Thanks. df

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/18/2000 07:18 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Pueblo

How about doing something along the lines of what we did with UCU on NBPL in
phanthom equity stock?  or something like that-- Mike worked on that deal and
I'm not sure who else-  MK

	From:  Drew Fossum                           02/17/2000 05:50 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Pueblo

I heard from Tino this afternoon and here's what's going on:
1.  Tino has been focused exclusively on right of way issues.  He's been
flying around in helicopters, etc. and not worrying about much else. They've
got environmental people already doing non-field work on possible routes,
like checking for available turtle studies and cultural resource stuff.
Dennis has been focused on the political angles (apparently) and has
purportedly gained some additional intelligence about PNM's effort to get DOE
to re-up their contract for a new two year term.  Tino says DOE told PNM to
pound sand and will continue to take service under month-to-month rollover of
the existing PNM-DOE contract until some alternative (i.e., Dennis) comes
along.
2.  Tino wants to get deeper into talking to us about possible deal
structures very soon.  This topic includes at least three things:  (1) how to
structure the ownership of the pipeline to maximize Enron and Dennis
finincial upside; (2) how to structure ownership of the power plant and
related facilities to maximize Enron and Dennis financial upside, while
satisfying DOE on Indian ownership, and (3) how to streamline the regulatory
approval process.  An example of the concerns Tino and Dennis are focused on
is "if the pipeline has a regulated rate of return, but the power plant has
to share profit with the Tribe ownership entity, where do we put the bulk of
the return???"  Also of concern is how we cut Dennis in on a slice of
upside--stock in Enron?  Profit sharing on the power plant or pipeline
ownership entity?  Something else?
3.  What do the economics look like?  This is obviously a threshold question
that we ought to be moving toward an answer on for ourselves, even if we
aren't in a position yet to share the information.  Specifically, given what
we know about the likely cost of the pipeline, and the likely capital cost
and heat rates of the turbines ENA has available, and what we know about
forward gas curves, and what we know about how much power PNM supplies to DOE
and at what rate (from the document Tino gave us in KC and PNM's tariff), do
we think we can build this thing and beat PNM's current price to DOE?  Can we
beat it by 10%?  Can we beat it by 10% and have enough $$$ to sweeten the
deal for the Tribe (partly because that would make it more attractive to
DOE)?

I suggested to Tino that he ought to put together a list of the issues that
they are working on and that they think we should be working on and what the
critical path issues and decisions are.  If we do the same, then we'd be in a
position to get another meeting together and have a productive agenda and
find out if this project has real potential or not.

Bottom line, I think if our analysis of question 3 is that we can hit decent
RAROC numbers and still undercut PNM's existing DOE contract and cut the
Tribe in on a decent share of the power plant upside, we ought to move
forward aggressively.    DF


Start Date: 1/18/02; HourAhead hour: 8;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011808.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


you should look into this.  not that there are necessarily violations, but
there have to at least be questions.  i used to get a curve report that
showed curve graphs on a volume bar chart.  have you looked at anything like
that lately?  you can find problems with a pretty quick scan.

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/04/2001 08:35 AM
To: Vladimir Gorny/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: Gas Curve Validation April 2001

This person hasn't found a violation in a year.  I find that hard to believe.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nguyen, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Gorny, Vladimir; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hall, Bob M; Lavorato, John;
Reeves, Leslie
Subject: Gas Curve Validation April 2001


Some of you may have entered updates to your personal information in eHRonline from Friday, March 1 through Monday, March 4.  However, we experienced some problems with the HR system during this time, and it is likely that certain updates were lost.  If you made an update during this period, please return to eHRonline and review your information particularly for the following four categories:
Banking information for direct deposit
Tax W-4 information
Home address
Emergency contact

Note that the first three categories above are related to payroll.  We are processing payroll for March 15.  If updates are needed for your March 15 paycheck, please eMail your update and P # to "HR Service Connection" before 11 a.m. on Thursday, March 7 for immediate processing.  Put "eHRonline Update" in the subject line and send as urgent so we can expedite processing.

For any updates applicable for future paychecks or non-payroll related, please re-enter your information directly in eHRonline.

Thanks and we apologize for the inconvenience.


-----Original Message-----
From: Crenshaw, Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Adam Stevens (E-mail); Alex Huang (E-mail); Amitava Dhar (E-mail); Anguel Grigorov (E-mail); Anita DuPont (E-mail); Bhalachandra Mehendale (E-mail); Bob Lee (E-mail); Candice Kao (E-mail); Chonawee Supatgiat (E-mail); Christopher Pernoud (E-mail); Eric Cope (E-mail); Gwyn Koepke (E-mail); Heather A. Johnson (E-mail); Jaesoo Lew (E-mail); Jason Sokolov (E-mail); Jose Marquez (E-mail); Joseph Hrgovcic (E-mail); Karthik Rajan (E-mail); Kenneth Deng (E-mail); Kevin G Moore (E-mail); Lance Cunningham (E-mail); Leann Walton (E-mail); Martin Lin (E-mail); Maureen Raymond (E-mail); Mike A Roberts (E-mail); Mitra Mujica (E-mail); Nelson Neale (E-mail); Osman Sezgen (E-mail); Paulo Issler (E-mail); Pinnamaneni Krishnarao (E-mail); Pravas Sud (E-mail); Praveen Mellacheruvu (E-mail); Rabi De (E-mail); Rakesh Bharati (E-mail); Roman Zadorozhny (E-mail); Sandeep Kohli (E-mail); Sarah Wooddy (E-mail); Seksan Kiatsupaibul (E-mail); Sevil Yaman (E-mail); Shalesh Ganjoo (E-mail); Shane Green (E-mail); Shravan Chopra (E-mail); Sofya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Stephen Bennett (E-mail); Tanya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Therese Candella (E-mail); Tom Barkley (E-mail); Tom Halliburton (E-mail); Vasant Shanbhogue (E-mail); Vince J Kaminski (E-mail); Wichai Narongwanich (E-mail); William Smith (E-mail); Zimin Lu (E-mail); Michael SCHILMOELLER (E-mail); Viacheslav Danilov (E-mail)
Subject: FW: More on this subject - Sharing Your Personal Information, It's Your Choice

Here is some more info on the email that we forwarded last week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cunningham, Lance
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:42 AM
To: Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject: More on this subject - Sharing Your Personal Information, It's Your Choice

Shirley,

Please forward to our group.

Lance
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Cunningham [mailto:mcunningham9@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Cunningham, Lance
Subject: Sharing Your Personal Information It's Your Choice

 sm-seal.gif (7805 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sm-seal.gif>	 sm-ftc.gif (15687 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sm-ftc.gif>
 sub_choice.gif (2731 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sub_choice.gif>

 sub_divider.gif (94 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/images/sub_divider.gif>

It's important to find out what happens to the personal information you provide to companies, marketers, and government agencies. These organizations may use your information simply to process your order; they may use it to tell you about products, services, or promotions; or they may share your information with others. More organizations are offering people choices about how their personal information is used. For example, many let you "opt-out" of having your information shared with others or used for promotional purposes.

Learn more about the choices you have to protect your personal information by contacting the following organizations.

 sub_bullet.gif (271 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sub_bullet.gif>	Credit Bureaus
 sub_bullet.gif (271 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sub_bullet.gif>	Department of Motor Vehicles
 sub_bullet.gif (271 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/sub_bullet.gif>	Direct Marketers

The FTC publishes a free brochure, Unsolicited Mail, Telemarketing and Email: Where to Go to "Just Say No," <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/optoutalrt.htm> that provides information on how you can cut down on the number of unsolicited mailings, calls and emails you receive by learning where to go to "just say no."

 sub_divider.gif (94 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/images/sub_divider.gif>

Credit Bureaus

The three major credit bureaus may have different requirements on how to opt-out. You can write your own letter or use our Sample Opt-Out Letter <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/cred-ltr.htm> to request that your personal information not be shared with others or used for promotional purposes.

The national credit bureaus offer a toll-free number that enables consumers to opt-out of all pre-approved credit offers with just one phone call. Call 1-888-5-OPTOUT (1-888-567-8688) for more information.

Visit the web site or phone each bureau for their most up-to-date information.

Equifax, Inc.Options <http://www.equifax.com/>
P.O. Box 740123
Atlanta, GA 30374-0123

ExperianConsumer Opt-Out <http://www.experian.com/>701 Experian Parkway
Allen, TX  75013
Trans Union Marketing List Opt Out <http://www.transunion.com/Personal/MarketingOptOut.asp>
P.O. Box 97328
Jackson, MS  39288-7328

The FTC publishes free brochures on credit-related issues <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/menu-credit.htm>. For a complete list of publications, write for Best Sellers <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/general/bestsell.pdf>, Consumer Response Center, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20580; or call (202) FTC-HELP, TDD (202) 326-2502.

 sub_divider.gif (94 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/images/sub_divider.gif>

Department of Motor Vehicles

State departments of motor vehicles (DMVs) maintain a lot of personal information about you. (Just look at your driver's license, for example.) The Drivers Protection Act <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2721.shtml> gives you privacy rights with regard to information maintained by DMVs. The law lists the ways this information can be used - a DMV may distribute personal information for things like law enforcement, driver safety, insurance underwriting, etc.

A recent amendment to the law now prohibits a DMV from distributing your personal information for other types of uses, including for direct marketing, unless you give them permission.

Contact the DMV in your state for more information.

| AK <http://www.state.ak.us/local/akpages/ADMIN/dmv/general/drrec.htm> | AL <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Alabama> | AR <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Arkansas> | AZ <http://www.dot.state.az.us/MVD/faqs/scripts/faqs.asp?section=dl> | CA <http://www.dmv.ca.gov/> | CO <http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/revenue_dir/MV_dir/mv.html> | CT <http://dmvct.org/copypg.htm> | DC <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#DC> | DE <http://www.state.de.us/pubsafe/index.htm> | FL <http://www.hsmv.state.fl.us/ddl/dppa.html> | GA <http://www.Georgianet.org/dps/divisions.html> | HI <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Hawaii> | IA <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Iowa> | ID <http://www2.state.id.us/itd/dmv/dmvstats.htm> | IL <http://www.sos.state.il.us/depts/drivers/dri_home.html> | IN <http://www.ai.org/bmv/index.html> | KS <http://www.ink.org/public/kdor/driver-optout.html> | KY <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Kentucky> |
| LA <http://www.dps.state.la.us/omvwww.nsf?OpenDatabase> | MA <http://www.magnet.state.ma.us/rmv/privacy/index.htm> | MD <http://mva.state.md.us/> | ME <http://www.state.me.us/sos/bmv/privacy.htm> | MI <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Michigan> | MN <http://www.dps.state.mn.us/dvs/index.html> | MO <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Missouri> | MS <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Mississippi> | MT <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Montana> | NC <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#North Carolina> | ND <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#North Dakota> | NE <http://www.nol.org/home/DMV/form2.htm> | NH <http://www.state.nh.us/safety/dmv.htm> | NJ <http://www.state.nj.us/mvs/> | NM <http://www.state.nm.us/tax/mvd/mvd_home.htm> | NV <http://www.state.nv.us/dmv_ps/> |
| NY <http://www.nydmv.state.ny.us/abstract.htm> | OH <http://www.state.oh.us/odps/division/bmv/frm_dnld.html> | OK <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Oklahoma> | OR <http://www.odot.state.or.us/dmv/index.htm> | PA <http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/home/index.asp> | RI <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Rhode Island> | SC <http://www.state.sc.us/dps/dmv/> | SD <http://www.state.sd.us/state/executive/revenue/motorvcl.htm> | TN <http://www.state.tn.us/safety/> | TX <http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/forms/> | UT <http://www.ps.ex.state.ut.us/dl/default.html> | VA <http://www.dmv.state.va.us/webdoc/citizen/records/release.html> | VT <http://www.aot.state.vt.us/dmv/dmvhp.htm> | WA <http://www.wa.gov/dol/> | WI <http://www.dot.state.wi.us/dmv/optout.html> | WV <http://www.state.wv.us/dmv/forms.htm> | WY <http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/dmv-add.htm#Wyoming> |

 sub_divider.gif (94 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/images/sub_divider.gif>

Direct Marketers

The Direct Marketing Association (DMA) offers the Mail, Telephone, and E-mail Preference Services, which allow you to opt-out of direct mail marketing, telemarketing and/or direct e-mail marketing from many national companies. Use the links below to access information and forms for the DMA's Mail, Telephone and/or E-mail Preference Services.

Visit the DMA's website <http://www.the-dma.org> for their most up-to-date information.

Direct Marketing Association
Mail Preference Service <http://www.the-dma.org/consumers/offmailinglist.html>
P.O. Box 9008
Farmingdale, NY  11735-9008

OR

Preference Service Manager
Direct Marketing Association
1120 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6700

Form in html format <http://www.the-dma.org/consumers/mps-sht.html>

Direct Marketing Association
Telephone Preference Service <http://www.the-dma.org/consumers/offtelephonelist.html>
P.O. Box 9014
Farmingdale, NY  11735-9014

OR

Preference Service Manager
Direct Marketing Association
1120 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10035-6700

Form in html format <http://www.the-dma.org/consumers/tps-sht.html>

Direct Marketing Association
E-mail Preference Service <http://www.e-mps.org>

Send via fax to: (212) 790-1427

The FTC publishes a free brochure on Shopping by Phone or Mail <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buying/mail.htm>. For a complete list of publications, write for Best Sellers <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/general/bestsell.pdf>, Consumer Response Center, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20580; or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357), TDD (202) 326-2502.

 sub_divider.gif (94 bytes) <http://www.ftc.gov/images/sub_divider.gif>

Contact Us <http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/talk_to_us.htm> | Search <http://www.ftc.gov/search> | Complaint Form <https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01> | FOIA <http://www.ftc.gov/foia/index.htm> | Privacy <http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm> | Site Map <http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/sitemap.htm> | Home <http://www.ftc.gov/index.html>

Last Updated: Wednesday, July 25, 2001


Dan, I offer my apologies once again for the delayed response.  It would be
nice if the California energy crisis would evaporate the away gas vaporizes
under normal atmospheric conditions, so that my work load could ease
dramatically.  But, no such luck.

With respect to your modifications to 4.2(iv)(b), 4.2(v), (4.2((vi), the
definition of "Act", the changes to "Arbitration Disputes to be Arbitrated",
they are acceptable.  However, at the risk of being a nitpicker, the word
"parties" in the language added to the "Arbitration Disputes to be
Arbitrated" paragraph should read "Parties."

Also, on or before the Effective Date, it would be appreciated if the City
could receive a list of the initial contact staff members of Enron who are
located on the trade floor.

For your information, the certified copy of the resolution no. 8040, adopted
March 12, 2001 by the city council, authorizing the city manager to sign the
Enfolio contract, will be delivered in the very near future.  I could fax to
you as soon as I get a fax number.  Please omit the draft resolution and the
deleted opinion of counsel in the final dispatch to me.  If the red-line and
strike-out changes [introductory paragraph, 4.2(iv)(b), 4.2(v) and (vi),
Act, Arbitration Disputes to be Arbitrated] could be removed, that would be
great.

The City has another inquiry.  The OFO language on page 2 of Appendix "1"
suggests that Enron is not responsible for OFO-related charges if it doesn't
receive properly or timely notice of an OFO condition.  Is this so?
Further, under what conditions would the City be required to give Enron
notice of an OFO?  Finally, EFOs are not addressed in this contract.  Do the
words "or other order or notice from a Transporter" in the Operational Flow
Orders paragraph contemplate EFOs?

I'm optimistic that we can wrap this up pretty soon.  Look forward to your
response to this e-mail.  Thanks, Grant.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:36 PM
To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

Grant,
     Sorry for the delay in responding to your additional inquiries.
     7.   Re 4.2(iv)(b) - I would propose the clause to read:  "(b) file a
petition or otherwise commence, authorize or acquiesce in the commencement
of a proceeding or cause under any bankruptcy or similar law of the
protection of creditors, or have such petition filed against it and such
proceeding remains undismissed for 30 Days, provided if a petition is filed
against the Affected Party and the  Affected Party is actively pursuing all
steps to have such proceeding dismissed and provides the other party with
reasonable documentation supporting its actions to cause such proceeding to
be dismissed, then such Affected Party shall have an additional 30 Days to
effectuate such dismissal,"
     8.   Re 4.2 (v) and 4.2 (vi) -  "20 or more Gas Days" is acceptable.
     13.  I will change the definition of "Act" as you suggest.
     21.  I propose that language be added whereby the parties shall first
attempt to settle the matters to be resolved by the use of binding
Arbitration by mon-binding mediation and if that does not resolve the issue
to the satisfaction of the parties, such matter shall thereafter be
resolved by the use of binding Arbitration.  Is this an acceptable
resolution?
     22.  We cannot agree to any list of parties who are authorized to
enter into transactions under the contract.  Our position is that whoever
answers the trading phone during trading hours is authorized to bind the
company.  However, we will provide the City with an initial contact list of
the people on the trading floor whom the city can contact as of the date
the contract is signed; however, the persons who are authorized to enter
into a transaction with the city will not be limited to the initial contact
list.  Of course, the city could always attempt to contact someone on the
initial contact list.  Will an initial contact list be acceptable?

Please let me have your thoughts concerning the above.
                                                   Dan.

                    "Kolling, Grant"

                    <grant_kolling@city.palo-a        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                    lto.ca.us>                        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                                                      cc:

                    03/16/2001 05:09 PM               Subject:     RE:
Enfolio Master Firm
                                                      Purchase/Sale
Agreement

Dan, please accept my apologies for replying so late.  I was out of town
again, and am back at trying to complete 5+ days of work within 3 days.

Thanks for accepting a lot of our requests.  Let me follow up with a couple
of additional inquiries.

7.  Re 4.2(iv), please suggest language as you've indicated in sentence 2.
Anything along the lines you've proposed likely will be agreeable.

8.  Re 4.2(v) and (vi).  How about 20 days?

13. Definition of "Act."  I suggest you refer to Article 11, sections 5 and
9 of the California Constitution, to be more specific.  Section 3 is not
regularly cited as the line of authority to the best of my knowledge,
though
I can see how the language could lead  one to cite it.

21.  In California, the concept of binding mediation is not recognized, if
I
have understood our outside counsel at prior mediations in which I've
participated.  Mediation is non-binding.  As a practical matter, it can
cost
almost as much in terms of time, money and effort to proceed to mediation,
but the "rules of engagement" are not as tight as are found in arbitration.
We avoid the rigid procedures.  I believe Enron should consider this
approach at times.  Having gone through a couple, I would not recommend to
my client that we would proceed any further once the mediator makes a
proposal that's acceptable to the parties.  The cost of arbitration is not
worth it.  That's why we in California tend to prefer mediation to
arbitration.

22.  I have to insist on behalf of my client that we assemble some list.
Surely, Enron can submit a list of people that will be initially approved
to
engage in authorized transactions.  We can do the same.  We've had an
unfavorable experience with another Texas-based
energy company regarding the scope of its representative's authority.  We
don't want to litigate the issue of due authority.  That list would help
It's not a matter of the city claiming the authority to back out of the
contract, because someone arguably didn't have the authority.  There are a
ton of cases which would make it extremely difficult to make that claim.

Thanks.  Grant.
          -----Original Message-----
          From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
          Sent:     Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:13 PM
          To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
          Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
          Subject:  RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

           << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >> << File: 0071988 RESO Enron.doc
>>
          (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

          Grant,
               I have reviewed your requested changes and have made
the changes which
          do not require explanation or clarification.  Those changes
are reflected
          in the above document.  Let me go over your list of items:
               1.   I have deleted the word "DRAFT".
               2.   I have left a blank for the date within the month
of March 2001
          when the contract would be executed by the City.
               3.   I have changed the word "may" to "shall".
               4.   Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity does not fit
in a
          Deficiency Default, it is just the maximum quantity that can
be handled by
          a party at a particular point.  I do not think their is an
omission.
               5.   I have added the word "reasonable".
               6.   The procedue for how the Termination Payment is
determined is
          provided, if the City disagrees with the method and values
provided in the
          statement and is unable to convince the Company to revise,
the statement,
          then the issue is to be resolved in arbitration.  At the
point that a
          Termination Payment calculation is necessary, a long drawn
out period
          should not be necessary to attain closure.
               7.   We need to limit the duration to 30 days,  neither
party should
          be required to wait 60 days before it could accelerate the
other party's
          obligations under the Contract.  We might be able to add
language to extend
          the period if we had some documentation stating the steps
that a party was
          pursuing to cause the proceeding to be dismissed and the
other party was
          otherwise kept whole from a credit exposure.
               8.   I have kept the 30 days because 5 days is too
short a period.
          During a holiday period, one scheduling error could cover
the entire
          period.  Article 3 has language which provides a remedy for
a party if a
          scheduling default extends for more than 5 days during any
month.
               9.   The reason is because Enron Corp. is the rated
entity and no
          separate rating applies to ENA.
               10.  I have changed "a" to "the"
               11.  I have eliminated the  60 day limitation on the
duration of an
          event of Force Majeure.
               12.  This merely addressed the possibility of a
imbalance amount being
          due when a pipeline aggregates imbalances using multiple
points, and the
          language would allocated the payment based on the amount of
the imbalance
          that a particular party may have caused.  I think the
language is clear as
          written.
               13.  The definition of Act was one of the items that I
had requested
          that you review and complete as necessary so that all
appropriate statutes
          were referenced.  I am still waiting for your language.  I
started filling
          it in using language that had been provided by the City.
               14.  I added the word "reasonable".
               15.  I have made the requested change relating to
GAAAP.
               16.  This is a late payment provision and as such a
believe that the
          provision should be more than a party's rating, as such I
have kept the 2%
          over prime language.
               17.  These amounts were determined by the credit group
and any change
          needs to be discussed with that group.  BBB-  is considered
investment
          grade and I understand that Enron Corp.'s rating is BBB.
ENA is not a
          rated entity and that is why the language relates to Enron
Corp.'s rating.
               18.  The elimination of the opinion of counsel did not
change the
          requirements relating to the representations that we expect
the City to
          have made.  If the City cannot make these representations,
then we need to
          know that before we execute the Contract.
               19.  I have added the word "reasonable".
               20.  The party that has the Transport Agreement with
the Transporter
          should have the legal right to obtain the information based
on its
          contract.
               21.  It is our position that any dispute be arbitrated.
We can agree
          to meditation if we can make the outcome binding on the
parties.  I am
          willing to discuss any changed language that you might care
to offer.
               22.  We have found that personnel of both our Company
and that of our
          Customers change so rapidily that the list is not workable
and merely
          allows a party to back out of transactions it does not like
on the basis
          that the person who agreed to such transaction was not on
the list.
          Therefore , we object to any listing of approved parties who
can transact.
          We believe that each party should be responsible for the
actions of its
          employees and should stand behind any transactions that
those parties may
          enter into pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
Contract.

               I will be out of the office on Friday, but will be in
all next week if
          you care to discuss any of these matters.

                              "Kolling, Grant"

                              <grant_kolling@city.palo-a        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                              lto.ca.us>
<Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Kolling, Grant"

<grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
                              03/02/2001 03:43 PM               cc:
Kim.Ward@enron.com

Subject:     RE: Enfolio Master Firm

Purchase/Sale Agreement

           <<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

          Dan:

          First, I've attached the proposed resolution which
authorizes the City
          Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

          More importantly, I need to inform you that our senior
management has
          reviewed the referenced contract; I have been asked to
present additional
          changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration and to
raise questions
          about certain of its terms and conditions.

          Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and proceed to the
end of the
          exhibits.

          1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of the Enfolio
agreement
          which
          should be deleted.

          2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not contain
the words "1st
          of
          January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until the parties
have signed the
          contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach as of the
date it signs
          the
          contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires the City
to proffer the
          to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

          3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City (Customer)
wants Enron
          (Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic Transaction,
as defined.
          Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should be
changed to "shall."

          4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first sentence:
Buyer's Requested
          Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's failure to
Schedule the
          Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a Seller's
Deficiency Default.
          How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity fit into a
Seller's
          Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested Quantity does
not include a
          Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is the reason
for the
          omission?

          5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line 23 refers
to "reasonable
          attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys' fees."
To be internally
          consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable attorneys' fees."

          6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A statement
showing the
          determination of the Termination Payment will be prepared.
It's unclear
          whether the City is entitled to review and challenge the
determination
          before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The City
should be entitled
          to
          receive a copy of the determination and to question it
before it is
          obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please clarify,
or permit the
          City to exercise these rights.

          7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering Event will
exist if a
          bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.  Is this
(under
          bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within which one
may seek
          dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer to the 11
USC section
          that
          backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

          8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30 days" to "5
days."  The
          City
          is concerned with the number of days that Enron may be
permitted to fail to
          Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by Enron.

          9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a default by
Enron Corp.
          (ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's default in
this regard?
          Please explain.

          10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed to refer
to "the Company"
          ?

          11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the force
majeure provision
          as drafted.  It states that the parties must perform even if
a FM event
          (earthquake) would prevent either or both parties from
performing with the
          60-day period stated therein.  There is no such limitation
under California
          law in the absence of a contract provision to the contrary.

          12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron translate the last
sentence?  We
          don't understand it.

          13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why Section 3 is
referred to?

          14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add "reasonable"
before
          "attorneys' fees.

           15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP means
generally accepted
          accounting principles, consistently applied, with respect to
Company, and
          governmental generally accepted accounting principles,
consistently
          applied,
          with respect to Customer."

          16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete "two
percent over".  The
          City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City believes
the 2% over prime
          should not apply to it.

          17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What does Enron
believe the
          City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million threshold is
mentioned.  Also,
          what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an investment grade
rating?

          18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we have agreed
that the
          opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps and
warranties are being
          deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties" is
nevertheless included
          in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted, because the
City has not
          undertaken a court search as is our custom and practice
whenever we issue
          an
          opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is not ...
Party."

          19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add
"reasonable" before
          "attorneys' fees."

          20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by "to the
extent it has a
          legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

          21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We do not as a
matter of
          legal
          policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate disputes.
Is Enron
          amenable to mediation?  This process is less formal and less
costly in my
          opinion.

          22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like the
Agreement to include
          a list of employees for Company and Customer who are
authorized to trade on
          behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be added to
this section to
          this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as an
Exhibit C.

          Thank you so much for considering these issues.  There are
others which I
          hope to receive from staff next week and which I will
forward to you for
          response.

          Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be out of
town after today
          until Wednesday, March 7.

          Sincerely,

          Grant Kolling
                    -----Original Message-----
                    From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com
[mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
                    Sent:     Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:16 AM
                    To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
                    Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
                    Subject:  Re:  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
          Agreement

                     << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
                    (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

                    Grant,
                         I have incorporated the language you provided
to me in
          the attached
                    document.  I have been informed by the Corporate
Secretary's
          office that
                    they will issue a Certificate of Incumbency
showing that the
          person
                    executing the contract for ENA is authorized to
execute
          contracts for ENA.
                    No other party signs as to form or terms, however,
the
          officer executing
                    for ENA will require that the deal person and I
initial on
          the line next to
                    his signature.  I have reviewed the proposed draft
          resolution.  ENA will
                    accept the enacted resolution and will not require
that the
          City Attorney
                    issue an opinion.  If the attached contract is
acceptable,
          please print off
                    2 originals, have them approved, signed and
forward to me
          for ENA's
                    approval and signature.  Once the contract is
fully
          executed, I will return
                    one fully executed original to you for the City's
file.

          (See attached file: 0071988 RESO Enron.doc)


Probably the best thing is for the call to go ahead, that way Jerry can
brief Mr. Skilling on our plans for the remaining dinners throughout the
year and Mr. Skilling can decide on the best one for him to attend.

Does that sound feasible to you?
Erica

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Erica Harris
Subject: Re: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Erica, Jeff is currently scheduled to be on vacation July 19.  Would it be
possible to schedule during the next quarter?

Thanks,
Joannie

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 12:09:54 PM

To:   "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Dear Mr. Skilling:

I write on behalf of Jerry Murdock, who is currently in Europe.  Mr.
Murdock
asked me to pass on the following information regarding your telephone call
scheduled for 10:00am (CST) on Tuesday, May 15.

Insight Capital hosts a quarterly dinner with Robert Rubin and Steve
Friedman and other selected guests.  Our next dinner is scheduled for July
19 and will be held in Aspen, Colorado.  The Current State of the Global
Market will be one of the topics under discussion and Jack Welch of GE is
one of your fellow invitees.

The purpose of your conversation with Mr. Murdock is to discuss the above
in
more detail and to more fully brief you on the purpose of these dinners.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further
information.

Erica Harris
Insight Capital Partners
680 Fifth Avenue
8th Floor
New York, NY  10019
(212) 230-9276

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the
message,
is strictly forbidden.

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the message,
is strictly forbidden.


for my schedule
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/28/2001 10:23 AM ---------------------------
From:	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 09:10 AM
To:	Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ENRON@enronXgate, James Prentice/ENRON@enronXgate, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	James Weitekamp/ENRON@enronXgate, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Virginia O'Neill/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Keiser/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Barnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas Meers/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Robert Guthrie/ENRON@enronXgate, James Saunders/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy Campos/ENRON@enronXgate, Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janice Hogan/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Gilbert/ENRON@enronxgate, Greek Rice/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	June Quarter Forecast Meeting and Commercial Business Review

Please note the following changes:

Commercial Business Review originally scheduled for Friday, June 22 at 1:30-3:30 has been moved to Wednesday,
June 20 from 1:30-3:00 in 49C2.  This meeting is for commercial and commercial support people only.

Quarter Forecast Meeting originally scheduled for Wednesday, June 20 from 1:30-2:30 has been moved to 3:00 that same day in 49C2.

Thanks

Tracy


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 06:38 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/13/2001 03:29 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "ryang@enron.com"
<ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com"
<vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legislative Update

The following bills passed out of the Senate Energy, Utilities and
Communications Committee today.  All of the bills were amended
substantially.  I will forward amendments as soon as they become
available.

SBX 5 (Sher) passed on a vote of 7-0 - $1.2 billion energy efficiency
and conservation measure
SBX 6 (Burton) passed on a vote of 6-0 - State Transco
SBX 33 (Burton) passed on a vote of 6-3 - Public power authority


Robin only bought 2074 dt's for the 2nd.  According to the sheet, the Tenn Z6
volumes were 2220 dt's.  I told Brian at CES we were going to short Energy
North by 146 dt's (the requested 1227 dt's but we only have 1081 dt's).

Please let me know how you sourced the gas.


hopefully downtown baby!


Hi Sue...

Boy, I couldn't write too much on this thing!  Too tiny!!

Dan wanted to tell you that there is leftover potatoe casserole on the top shelf of the fridge...help yourself.

I guess that's it for now. Hope you don't freeeeeeze tonight.

Love, JUDY
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Don't you love "competition"
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000 09:56
AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/09/2000 03:54 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CalPX Requests Exclusive Right To ISO Forward Pwr Trades

Just curious, but do we agree that the PX is the most liquid forward market,
or is the OTC already more liquid that the PX?   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 09/10/2000
09:56 ---------------------------
From: Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/10/2000 22:45
To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul Kaufman@ECT,
Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D Steffes@EES,
Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie Mandelker@ECT,
filuntz@aol.com, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT, Liz@luntz.com, Mona L
Petrochko@EES, Peggy Mahoney@EES, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Bradley@ENRON, Shelley
Corman@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: CalPX Requests Exclusive Right To ISO Forward Pwr Trades

CalPX Requests Exclusive Right To ISO Forward Pwr Trades

10/04/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Power Exchange requested Monday that
if the state Independent System Operator is given the ability to purchase
forward power, it make its trades only through the CalPX.
The ISO filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission last month for
approval to buy forward power because it said utilities underscheduled
supply, forcing the ISO to buy expensive emergency power last summer.
"We are generally supportive of (the ISO's) procuring power in the forward
markets, but we want to make sure the ISO does that procurement through us
because it should be done in the market with the most liquidity," said CalPX
spokesman Jesus Arredondo.
In its filing with the FERC, CalPX said that experimentation with "fledgling"
forward markets would place customers at risk for higher transactional costs
and might discourage the development of forward markets in California.
The ISO controls most of the state's power grid and real-time market, and the
CalPX is the spot market where electricity is bought and sold in the state.
   By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com


As some of you might already know, I resigned today.  I feel fortunate and blessed to have had this experience here at Enron.  Not only have I learned a tremendous amount, but I also have met some very talented and unique people.  I am not 100% sure what I will do at this point, but I will probably be heading up to NYC in January.  I feel sad to end this chapter, yet excited as I begin a new one in my life.

As always, it has been a pleasure working with you!  Keep in touch.  I will be interested to see what happens.

Carole C. Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell
713.467.3860 home
carole_frank@excite.com


Any progress on our access. We would really like to get a look at the weather up here.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gaskill, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:02 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: New Fundy's Site

I am waiting on a list of people who have signed with UBS - I requested one yesterday afternoon from HR.  I will send an e-mail when we get the security set up.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:52 AM
To:	Gaskill, Chris
Subject:	New Fundy's Site

Chris,

Can you make sure that the guys in Calgary have access to the new fundy's site. I am having problems getting in.

Thanx

Chris Dorland


(See attached file: HPLN0103.xls)

 - HPLN0103.xls


Please plan to attend a meeting regarding MidTex.
Room 3013, Monday, Feb. 28 - 1pm.

We will be discussing the nominating procedures on the HPL/MidTex
interconnects.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

- Aimee


Attached are some slides that INGAA recently put together to demonstrate
that (1) marketing affiliates do not hold capacity solely on affiliated
pipelines and (2) that marketing affiliates receive discounts that are
comparable to the discounts given to marketers as a class.


January 29, 2002

NESA MEMBERS:

Attached is our latest and greatest brown bag being held February 20, 2002.
Everyone that registers for this event by February 8, 2002, will be
automatically put into a drawing for Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo
tickets.  YEE-HAW!

Hope to see you there!

Lana Moore
Director of Education
NESA
(713) 856-6525

 <<Storage Economics.doc>>

 - Storage Economics.doc


Ron,
 Here is the last document.
Thanks
Gary
 <<FERC_Table_Def.csv>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - FERC_Table_Def.csv


Brett, since Enron owns NEPCO - true risk transfer under a fixed price
contract is difficult.  However, I do like the behaviour that you get from
such accountability (ie) high incentive to get done on time and on budget.
My experience with NEPCO on cost plus has been very unfavourable (don't like
#1).  I will be supportive of any structure that aligns our interests
appropriately.  You might want to bounce a few ideas off Dan.  I have already
given him a heads up on the value at stake if we can come in at the low end
of the scale and early.

Drop me a note on where you end up.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000
05:14 PM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs@ENRON
12/20/2000 06:07 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: EPC for Eletrobolt

Dave:

Do you have any general guidance on how you would like for me to approach the
EPC contract with NEPCO Houston?  The three options that we currently have on
the table are:

Fixed engineering/internal costs with pass-through on external costs with fee.
Same structure with cap.
Fixed price contract.

Our last conversation was very focused on a fixed price contract.  My
conversations with Dan Leff were moving in the direction of one or two.  My
concern on a fixed price number is the timing and my negotiating position,
but I understand your issues.  Any general thoughts would be helpful.

Thanks,
Brett


Chris--The attached file is an update of our March 2000 needs.   There are 3
changes versus the prior version sent earlier today.  These are listed below.

Please call if you have questions.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03 00 SUPPLY NEEDS - ALL LDCS                     (MASTER).xls


Louise - Here is the list.  Please identify your absolute superstars - franchise players.  Thanks.  Ted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jenkins, Alicia
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Bland Jr., Ted C.
Subject:	AAs in EA as of Nov 19th
Importance:	High


FYI Tuesday, October 23 was Jan's 20 year anniversary with Enron.


fyi
jan red jan 32/33 with sep @392


yes


Eric:

Clay Harris and I met with the Venezuelan Ambassador this afternoon and reiterated our interest in arranging a meeting for Enron with President Chavez, who will visit the UK during 21-24 October.  The ambassador responded initially that Chavez's schedule had been "set for months" and that changing the schedule would be difficult.  After further discussion, he said Chavez would certainly be interested in discussing the project, and that they might be able to make time on the schedule at about 1100 hours on Tuesday 23 Oct.  We provided a brief overview of the status of the project, and he asked that we provide as soon as possible names and bio information for whoever would meet with Chavez if this comes off.  He promised to get back to us as quick as he can.  Please let us know who will be available from Houston for a possible Tuesday morning meeting here.  Thanks.

Jim


Have you requested my upgrade?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/19/99
10:09 AM ---------------------------

Felix Buitron
12/15/99 08:45 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Felix Buitron/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:45
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  General Announcement @ ENRON                           12/06/99 06:20
PM

Sent by: General Announcement@ENRON
To: All Enron North America And Corp
cc:
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

In an effort to continuously improve the service we provide to our customers
we have created one central mail ID for all IT Purchase Requests.  This new
ID is Enron IT Purchasing.  Please send all future IT Purchasing requests to
this ID as opposed to sending your requests to one individual in the
purchasing group.  If you do not use this ID your purchase request may be
delayed.  Also, please remember that all Technology purchases should go
through the IT Purchasing department if you intend to use them for business
purposes.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Regards,
Bob Hillier
Application Systems


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/15/2000
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

11/15/2000 06:45 AM
To: Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management
Responsibilities

What does this mean to our budgets?     Is there a contract with EES that
allows them to make an "intercompany profit" on this business?     The reason
for my concern is 1) EES is a marketing affiliate and 2) profits paid to
affiliates are not allowed under several of our joint venture agreements and
will come under intense scrutiny at the FERC.     I will need to understand
in detail what I am going to be billed from EES.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/15/2000
06:42 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Steve Kean & Bill Donovan                           11/14/2000 06:36 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Houston
cc:

Subject: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management
Responsibilities

Responsibility  for daily operations of building support services in the
Enron Building, Houston leased offices, and Two Pacific Place (Omaha) will be
transitioning from Corporate to Enron Energy Services (EES) by year-end.  The
areas affected include facility operations and maintenance of mechanical,
electrical, and air-conditioning systems; mail delivery;  housekeeping;
food, copier, and records services.

This transition of services, as presently managed by Enron Property and
Services Corp. (EPSC), is designed to optimize value to Enron,s Business
Units by leveraging facility management businesses now offered by EES to
their commercial customers.  EPSC staff having administrative responsibility
for these services will report to Enron Facility Services, a subsidiary of
EES,s Global Energy Services group led by Daniel Leff, President and CEO.

EPSC is responsible for Enron,s internal real estate and office development
needs, including leasing, space allocations and facility planning, project
and construction management, furniture systems, and office relocation.  EPSC,
in its development role, remains a part of Enron Corporate Administration
Services (ECAS) along with Corporate Security and the Aviation Department,
reporting to Bill Donovan, Vice President, Corporate Administrative Services.

This alignment of responsibilities offers the opportunity for EPSC to focus
resources on effective utilization of our existing office space assets and
managing the development of Houston,s new Enron Center Campus project.


Attached is a brief proposal for economics arguments against the CPUC's
proposal for load based price caps.  Obviously, these arguments would also
apply to the ISO Board's recent decision.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:00 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>
              10/27/2000 10:58 AM

To: <mary.hain@enron.com>
cc: <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
Subject: Motion for Interim Relief by CPUC

Mary:

cc: Ron, Jim

I have had a quick read-through of the CPUC Motion, as requested. There
would appear to be two salient points.

1) CPUC asks for FERC to impose strict load-differentiated price caps. These
would be imposed using a formula based on "margina1 heat rates" times an
index gas price. So the maximum cap would be around $100 and the minimum
could be quite low off-peak - more like $30-40/MWh. Needless to say this
does not recognize the opportunity costs of power in other markets. It was
also completely make redundant any trading into California. The prices would
rise immediately to the low caps, so there would be no incentive for anyone
to enter into any commerical hedging arrangements. The mechanism is
basically similar to the old SRAC QF contracts, but without the capacity
payments.

2) CPUC asks that FERC require all jurisdictional generators AND marketers
to offer forwards contracts for a substantial portion of their capacity at
FERC regulated rates and conditionns for 18-36 months. They claim these are
like the UK and Australian "vesting contracts", but these involved
significant capacity or options payments as well. CPUC request that all
generators and marketers should be instructed to begin preparation of
cost-based filings (how this would actually work is not stated).

Needless to say the implementation of any of this would be wiping out the
market for up to three years, and eliminating any potential profits from
current long positions in the market.

The schemes they have proposed have numerous problems - even if the
objectives were desirable - so there is plenty to poke holes in. The
decision on whether to file any response to me would seem to be based on
whether these issues will be completely addressed in FERC's order, making
the CPUC Motion irrelevant. If there is any chance that the CPUC could be
taken seriously their motion should be opposed, as the restrictions on the
market are quite onerous. Any players with long positions in the market
would stand to lose quite a bit under the proposed capped rates at these
levels.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


Your message

  To:      OMeara, Dina; Edmiston, John; Gas Daily (E-mail); Iferc1
(E-mail); Iferc2 (E-mail); NGI (E-mail)
  Sent:    Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:31:58 -0400

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

OMeara, Dina on Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:36:02 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:South Brunswick:TORMXSMB01

 - C.DTF


- Lunch(1).jpg


trying to keep from sucking on a tailpipe in my garage.  Just hanging in there and waiting to see what happens.  I have a few feelers out.  We will just see what happens.  How are things with you?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sonntag, Gregory B." <gbsonnta@utmb.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:

How are you holding out?


Amber---

Marriott fell off July 1, 2000 behind BUG.

LC


www.reliaquote.com
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
 FAMILY SECURITY You work hard to give your family basic life necessities such as food, clothing and a home. You are the key to your family's financial security. Your spouse and children count on you for so much.   OUTSTANDING VALUE Term life insurance makes it possible for you to purchase a significant amount of coverage at an affordable price. It is a small price to pay for your family's protection should misfortune occur.  COMPLETE PROTECTION Term life insurance provides money to help your family should the unthinkable happen. The death benefit can help your family keep food on the table, pay for your children's education and even pay off the mortgage. 	     10-Year Level Term Life Insurance Male/Female Monthly Premiums No Nicotine    $250,000  $500,000 Age Male Female Male Female 35 $10.33 $9.19 $16.19 $14.00 40 $13.30 $11.64 $22.32 $18.82 45 $19.43 $16.63 $35.57 $22.88 50 $29.49 $22.32 $54.69 $40.25 55 $44.89 $32.12 $85.32 $59.94     Sample rates underwritten by First Colony Life Insurance Company. Term life insurance subject to the terms of Policy Form nos. 1420 (96) et al and 1421 et al which includes an exclusion period of death by suicide. Premiums include a $50 annual policy fee. No nicotine use includes use of all nicotine and nicotine substitutes. Subject to state availability and issue limitations. Based on premiums paid monthly. Rates are higher for other underwriting classifications. ReliaQuote Inc. is a licensed insurance agency dba ReliaQuote Insurance Services in CA, license #0C16621.
 Copyright 2001 ReliaQuote, Inc. All rights reserved. If you feel you've received this message in error, or if you  no longer wish to receive these special offers please   Click Here


Mary Kay, Lindy told me you had spoken with her about the issue that was
raised on Friday with regard to allocation of FTS-1 and FTS-3 capacity.  I
believe that a slight modification to page 80B may be needed to reflect the
fact that FTS-3 will not be allocated along with FTS-1; I'll draft the
modification and circulate it.  Question:  would you prefer to circulate a
new pro forma Sheet No. 80B sometime in the next couple of weeks, or wait
until we make our compliance filing (whenever FERC issues its order)?


Thanks.  Attached is the official GE numbers.  Hopefully they match up.....

Eric

Kay Mann
11/29/2000 12:46 PM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Here's how the numbers are being handled in another LM deal.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000 12:46
PM ---------------------------

Tracee Bersani@ECT
11/28/2000 03:26 PM
To: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Here it is.

Regards
Tracee

From: Cheryl Lipshutz on 11/28/2000 03:24 PM
To: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Tracee,
Aren't there 8 LM 6000 turbines?  If so, do you have the serial numbers to
the last two ones?

	Tracee Bersani
	11/28/2000 02:59 PM

		 To: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Rob/Kay,
As discussed in today's meeting, I have the turbine serial numbers for you:

1.  LM 6000 Serial numbers:

Regards,
Tracee
713-345-5688


I'm back.  I will review and comment on their responses.

	Mark Knippa
	11/27/2000 11:11 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec
		 cc:
		 Subject: ECS/EES Master Contract

The Holiday is over bud.

Where are we with EES relative to this Master Agreement.  Let me know when we
can discuss.

thanks
mk

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 11:10
AM ---------------------------

Bo Barnwell@EES
11/20/2000 09:13 AM
To: Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ECS/EES Master Contract

Mark,

Please forward to the person sitting in for Gerald.  Also, please let me know
who this person is.

As always, Thanks.    Bo
---------------------- Forwarded by Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES on 11/20/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Mike D Smith                           11/17/2000 03:31 PM

To: Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Greg
Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S Laipple/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: ECS

Here is the master, clean and red lined to the changes that ECS wanted.  I
have not worked on the TA yet.  MDS


Do you want to go over to the game in two weeks?  I got four tickets - 2 for
your brother and 1 for me.  Ashley is staying home.  Let me know.
PL


My  friend Sandi sent me this.  I thought you might like it,  too.

GREAT picture!!
> Please read all this first before  opening up the picture.  This is pretty
> cool!  Be sure to read  the explanation below before looking at the
attached
> picture.   You can't really appreciate the picture without knowing what it
is
>  exactly.  This isn't a joke, so don't expect a punchline or  strange/funny
> picture.
> Through the viewfinder of his camera,  Ensign John Gay could see the
fighter
> plane drop from the sky heading  toward the port side of the aircraft
carrier
> Constellation.  At  1,000 feet, the pilot drops the F/A-18C Hornet to
increase
> his speed  to 750 mph, vapor flickering off the curved surfaces of the
plane.
> In  the precise moment a cloud in the shape of a farm-fresh egg  forms
around
> the Hornet 200 yards from the carrier,its engines  rippling the Pacific
Ocean
> just 75 feet below, Gay hears an explosion  and snaps his camera shutter
once.
>  "I clicked the same time I  heard the boom, and I knew I had it", Gay
said.
> What he had was a  technically meticulous depiction of the sound barrier
being
> broken  July7,1999, somewhere on the Pacific between Hawaii and Japan.
> Sports  Illustrated, Brills Content, and Life ran the photo.  The photo
>  recently took first prize in the science and technology division in  the
World
> Press Photo 2000 contest, which drew more than 42,000  entries worldwide.
> "All of a sudden, in the last few days,I've been  getting calls from
> everywhere about it again.  It's kind of neat, "  he said, in a telephone
> interview from his station in Virginia Beach,  VA.
> A naval veteran of 12 years, Gay, 38, manages a crew of eight  assigned to
> take intelligence photographs from the high-tech belly of an  F-14Tomcat,a
> Joint Task Force Exercise as the Constellation made its way  to Japan.
> Gay selected his Nikon 90 S, one of the five 35 mm cameras he  owns.  He
set
> his
> 80-300 mm zoom lens on 300 mm, set his  shutter speed at 1/1000 of a second
> with an aperture setting of  F5.6.  "I put it on full manual, focus and
> exposure," Gay  said.  "I tell young photographers who are into automatic
>  everything, you aren't going to get that shot on auto.  The plane is  too
> fast.  The camera can't keep up."
> At sea level a plane  must exceed 741 mph to break the sound barrier, or
the
> speed at which  sound travels.  The change in pressure as the plane outruns
> all of  the pressure and sound waves in front of it is heard on the ground
as
>  an explosion or sonic boom.  The pressure change condenses the water  in
the
> air as the jet passes these waves.  Altitude, wind  speed,humidity, the
shape
> and trajectory of the plane - all of these  affect the breaking of this
> barrier.  The slightest drag or  atmospheric pull on the plane shatters the
> vapor oval like fireworks as  the plane passes through,he said everything
on
> July 7 was  perfect.  "You see this vapor flicker around the plane that
gets
>  bigger and bigger.  You get this loud boom, and it's instantaneous.   The
> vapor cloud is there, and then it's not there.
> It's the  coolest thing you have ever seen."
> Now open the  picture.

 - CLOUD.jpg


Gerald,

 Paul Miller has requested that I provide copies of the executed Bighorn
gathering agreements for CMS Oil & Gas and Pennaco to Gulfstar.

 I have a copy of the Pennaco agreement, but it was provided as a document
during the Bighorn Due Diligence.  I do not have a copy of a CMS Oil & Gas
Gas Gathering Agreement.

 What is your thought about Northern Border providing the Pennaco Agreement
to Gulfstar?    If that is acceptable, do you have access to the CMS Oil &
Gas Gathering Agreement?

 Thanks.  Eva.


If Ken Lay's going to Sac to have meetings, seems that he should meet
w/Burton.  You agree?  Thx, Jeff


Lisa --

You should also attend.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharp, Vicki
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Keller, James; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	EES Draft Request for No-Action Letter

Jim Keller will be setting up a meeting to discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 09/28/2001 01:27 PM ---------------------------

EveraertN@sullcrom.com on 09/28/2001 12:23:58 PM
To:	vsharp@enron.com, mark.e.taylor@enron.com
cc:	GilbergD@sullcrom.com, Raislerk@sullcrom.com
Subject:	EES Draft Request for No-Action Letter

Please find attached a revised draft of the Request for No-Action Letter.
We have also attached a redline showing the revisions made to the previous
draft.

Sincerely,

Natalie Everaert

 <<No-Action Request - CFTC(v8).DOC>>  <<Redline 09-28 No-Action Request -
CFTC.rtf>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - No-Action Request - CFTC(v8).DOC
 - Redline 09-28 No-Action Request - CFTC.rtf

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>