Per Mr. Steven Kean, of Enron Corp. please see below ( Appendix C - Order 888
"Allegations of Public Utilities Exercising Transmission
Dominance).

                                                                 APPENDIX C

          Allegations of Public Utilities Exercising Transmission Dominance

          I.  Examples From Proceedings Before Administrative Law Judges

               These are examples of allegations that various public

          utilities have refused to provide comparable service, either

          through refusals to wheel, dilatory tactics that so protracted

          negotiations as to effectively deny wheeling, refusals to provide

          service priority equal to native load, or refusals to provide

          service flexibility equivalent to the utility's own use.

               A.  American Electric Power Service Corp. (AEP)

               In 1993, AEP filed, on behalf of its public utility

          associate companies, an open access tariff that offered only firm

          point-to-point service with very limited flexibility.  It did not

          offer network service, flexible point-to-point service, or non-

          firm service.  Thus, it did not provide customers with the same

          flexibility that AEP itself has.  Nor did it provide a service

          priority equivalent to that enjoyed by native load.  The

          Commission set AEP's tariff for hearing and, on rehearing, held

          that in order not to be unduly discriminatory, the tariff had to

          offer comparable service.  American Electric Power Service Corp.,

          64 FERC 4 61,279 (1993), reh'g, 67 FERC 4 61,168 (1994).

               At hearing, Raj Rao of Indiana Michigan Power Agency (IMPA)

          (Ex. IMPA-1, Feb 23, 1994) and Kenneth Hegemann of American

          Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP-Ohio) (Ex. AMPO-1, Feb 23, 1994),

          both senior management officials, testified concerning AEP's
,

                                        - 2 -

          alleged discriminatory practices. 1/  AMP-Ohio is an

          association of municipalities in Ohio, some of whose members

          depend on AEP for transmission and partial requirements service.

          IMPA is an association of municipalities in Indiana, and many of

          IMPA's loads are captive to the AEP transmission system.  The

          witnesses alleged as follows:

                    1.  In anticipation of high peak demands, AEP would

               contract for large blocks of available short-term power,

               withhold sale of short-term power, refuse to transmit third

               party short-term power, and require purchases from AEP at

               the emergency rate (100 mill/kwh) when an emergency might

               not exist.  Ex. AMPO-1 at 6.

                    2.  In December 1989, AMP-Ohio negotiated a 20 MW

               purchase of short-term power from Louisville Gas & Electric

               Company (LG&E).  AEP refused to wheel because LG&E had

               earlier that day told AEP it had no power to sell to AEP.

               AEP then bought the power from LG&E and offered to resell it

               to AMP-Ohio.  Ex. AMPO-1 at 6-7.

                    3.  In January 1990, AMP-Ohio solicited bids for

               February power purchases from a number of utilities

               including AEP.  AEP was not the winning bid.  AMP-Ohio made

               arrangements to purchase the power from four winning bidders

               and sought transmission through AEP.  When AMP-Ohio gave AEP

          1/   After the Rehearing Order expanding the scope of the
               proceeding, AMP-Ohio and IMPA withdrew this testimony as no
               longer necessary.  This withdrawal does not change the fact
               that the testimony was sworn to under oath.
,

                                        - 3 -

               the schedule for delivery, AEP refused to transmit the

               power, matched the average price of the winning bids, and

               made the sale itself.  Ex. AMPO-1 at 7.

                    4.  In August 1993, an AMP-Ohio member (Columbus, Ohio)

               was purchasing 10 MW of hourly non-displacement power from

               AEP and, after AEP raised its price to 60 mills/kwh, sought

               another source for the next hour.  Consumers Power Company

               and Detroit Edison Company both offered non-displacement

               power at 40 mills.  AEP refused to transmit, saying it had a

               600 MW unit out and could not resell power from another

               source. 2/  Columbus cancelled the transaction and had to

               buy 10 MW of power from AEP at 100 mills/kwh.  Ex. AMPO-1 at

               7-8.

                    5.  In July 1993, two AMP-Ohio members (Columbus and

               St. Mary's) had been buying hourly non-displacement power

               from AEP when the price rose to 35 mills.  Dayton Power &

               Light Company (DP&L) offered to sell at 23 mills and AEP

               agreed to transmit for one hour.  But for the next hour, AEP

               said it had problems with its system, refused to transmit

               the power, kept the power from DP&L for itself and offered

               to sell power to AMP-Ohio for Columbus and St. Mary's at 100

          2/   AEP generally limited its offer of short-term transmission
               to buy/sell transactions; that is, AEP would buy the power
               from the seller and resell it to the purchaser.
               Supplemental testimony of AEP Witness Baker (Ex. A-73) at
               27-29.  Often, the terms of the buy/sell transaction
               required transmission dependent utilities (TDUs) to maintain
               reserves and meet contractual commitments for at least a
               year.  Id.
,

                                        - 4 -

               mills.  Columbus increased its local generation, but St.

               Mary's purchased 8 MW at 100 mills.  For the next hour, AMP-

               Ohio arranged with DP&L for another 8 MW, hoping AEP would

               transmit under the 24 hour buy-sell agreement.  AEP did

               transmit this power.  Seven hours later in the day, St.

               Mary's Greenup Hydro project power was available and the 8

               MW from DP&L was no longer needed.  If St. Mary's had been

               receiving the hourly power that AEP had refused to transmit,

               St. Mary's could have switched to Greenup power.  But

               because AMP-Ohio had changed to daily service, St. Mary's

               had to pay a demand charge for the entire day, even though

               it used the power only 7 hours and would have paid less

               under the hourly rate.  Ex. AMPO-1 at 8-9.

                    6.  In January 1994, AMP-Ohio sought to transfer power

               from one member with generation to other members, which

               required transmission over AEP and Toledo Edison lines.

               Toledo Edison said yes, AEP said no.  AMP-Ohio's northern

               members purchased emergency power from Toledo Edison.  AMP-

               Ohio then reminded AEP that it had agreed not to deny

               transmission and AEP agreed to transmit.  Ex. AMPO-1 at 9.

                    7.  IMPA arranged to buy 80 MW of short-term power from

               LG&E and have it wheeled, using buy-sell arrangements,

               through Public Service Company of Indiana (PSI) and AEP to

               serve IMPA's load at Richmond (an IMPA member).  The

               delivered price was $.292 per kW-day plus a 1 mill adder.

               At the same time AEP arranged to buy 300 MW from PSI at $.30
,

                                        - 5 -

               per kW day plus out-of-pocket energy costs.  Hence, PSI was

               shipping a total of 380 MW to AEP with 80 MW of that amount

               to be delivered to IMPA's load at Richmond.  Then, on a day

               when IMPA should have received the 80 MW, AEP told IMPA that

               PSI had sold everything to AEP and that IMPA would have to

               buy from AEP at $.63 per kW day plus the cost of energy from

               AEP.  IMPA purchased from AEP under protest.  AEP used its

               control over transmission to intercept the 80 MW at a lower

               price and resell it as short-term power to IMPA.  AEP

               claimed that PSI had terminated its sales to AEP on that

               day.  But the 80 MW was independent of PSI's other sales to

               AEP and would not have been interrupted if AEP had not

               interrupted it.  IMPA-1 at 7.

                    8.  IMPA has combustion turbines owned by and located

               at one member, which IMPA would like to connect to the Joint

               Transmission System owned by IMPA, CINergy and Wabash Valley

               Power Association.  To do so, IMPA needed a metering

               agreement with AEP, to which AEP would not agree.  IMPA-1 at

               6.

                    9.  In January 1994, IMPA had power to sell from its

               turbines when AEP and others needed power.  IMPA offered

               power to AEP but AEP it said could not purchase the power

               without an existing contract.  Moreover, since there was no

               short-term tariff, IMPA could not sell the power to another

               utility.  IMPA-1 at 6.

                    10.  Another example of the utility engaging in
,

                                        - 6 -

               dilatory tactics that raised the customer's transaction

               costs and effectively denied transmission is the "sham

               transaction" provision proposed by AEP.  As filed, AEP's

               tariffs permitted it to deny service merely because a

               portion of the transmitted power might be used to serve a

               former retail customer of AEP.  See, e.g., Ex. BR&WVP-1 (J.

               Bertram Solomon testimony, February 23, 1994).  (As part of

               a settlement AEP filed the pro forma tariff and withdrew

               this provision.)

                    11.  Finally, AEP's originally filed tariff contained a

               "prodigal customer" provision.  Under this provision,

               transmission customers who sought to convert back to

               requirements service had to give AEP five years' notice, in

               which case AEP and the customer would enter into

               negotiations to determine whether AEP will provide service

               at all and if so under what rate, terms, and conditions.

               Ex. S-39 at 1 (Staff testimony).  AEP did not require notice

               from all new customers, only from prodigal customers.  Id.

               at 2.  That a potential customer was previously served by

               AEP is not a reason to treat the customer differently.  (AEP

               withdrew this provision when it filed the pro forma tariff.)

                    B.  Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy)

               Entergy filed a partial settlement largely adopting the NOPR

          pro forma tariffs except for two provisions (headroom and

          ancillary services).  Because the settlement predated the filing

          date for customer testimony before the ALJ, the customers did not
,

                                        - 7 -

          address the need for Entergy to file a tariff.  However,

          customers did make allegations of discriminatory practices, as

          follows.

                    1.  Customers alleged that Entergy flat-out refused to

               wheel.  Louisiana Energy and Power Authority (LEPA) witness

               Sylvan J. Richard testified that LEPA's predecessor systems

               could not obtain interconnections from Entergy.  Ex. SJR-1

               at 50.

                    2.  Customers also alleged that Entergy refused to

               provide service priority equal to native load and refused to

               provide service flexibility equivalent to the utility's own

               use.  For example, LEPA witness Richard testified that even

               after state commissions ordered interconnections and other

               coordination services, LEPA's predecessors were still not

               able to obtain coordination services because Entergy was not

               willing to coordinate and because the transmission service

               it did offer was inflexible, unidirectional point-to-point

               service, which prevented economic coordination with others.

               Id. at 50-51.

                    3.  South Mississippi Electric Power Association

               (SMEPA) witness J. Bertram Solomon testified that Entergy's

               original "open access" tariff was restricted to point-to-

               point service, proposed separate charges for each operating

               company, and required the cancellation of existing

               agreements in order to take service under the proposed

               tariff.  Ex. SMEPA-10 at 28.  Entergy eventually filed a
,

                                        - 8 -

               network tariff, but proposed different local facilities

               charges for the various Entergy public utility operating

               subsidiaries.  Id. at 29.  Since these local facilities

               charges were higher than the transmission component of the

               subsidiaries' bundled rates, Entergy obtained a competitive

               advantage.  Id.

                    4.  The Arkansas Cities and Cooperatives (ACC) is a

               group of cities and cooperatives that own or operate

               electric generation or distribution systems in Arkansas.

               ACC Witness Steven Merchant testified that Entergy has

               segregated the wholesale market between two of its

               subsidiaries, Arkansas Power & Light Copmpany (APL) and

               Entergy Power, Inc. (EPI).  Ex. SMM-1 at 16.  In marketing

               power and energy in Arkansas, EPI is subject to an Arkansas

               Commission order that bars EPI from competing with APL for

               wholesale loads without first obtaining a waiver.  Id.

               Recently, EPI requested this waiver for all wholesale

               transactions in Arkansas except for wholesale customers

               currently served by an Entergy subsidiary; in other words,

               EPI requested the Arkansas Commission to expand competition

               for all wholesale customers except where EPI might compete

               with APL.  Id.  ACC witness Merchant concluded that, since

               EPI does not compete with APL, Entergy insulates APL's

               wholesale business from competition and denies those

               wholesale customers access to EPI as a source of power,

               thereby limiting alternative generation sources available to
,

                                        - 9 -

               ACC.  Id. at 17-19.  (Entergy's witness Kenney stated that

               Entergy has recently filed a joint motion with ACC to the

               Arkansas Commission seeking to extend the waiver and permit

               EPI to sell to APL's wholesale customers.  Ex. JFK-11 at 14-

               15.)

               C.  Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)

               Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) attached several

          documents to its 1988 complaint in Docket No. EL89-4.  These

          documents were provided to support NCPA's claim that PG&E's

          unreasonable practices under the PG&E/NCPA Interconnection

          Agreement (IA) effectively denied NCPA access to transmission

          properly requested under the IA.  Although the parties eventually

          settled and the Commission terminated the docket with a letter

          order dated May 18, 1988, these documents provide allegations of

          PG&E using dilatory tactics that so protracted negotiations as to

          effectively equal a refusal to wheel. 3/

                    1.  PG&E stated that since transmission was not

               currently available, it was entitled to wait 72 months

               before providing transmission; that is, transmission access

               could not be granted before the passing of the 72-month

               notice period.  NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex. 3.  However, the IA

          3/   All of these incidents are related to and examples of PG&E's
               conduct described in the NOPR (FERC Stats. & Regs. 4 32,514
               at 33,073 n.151), that is, the history of PG&E's attempt to
               avoid its commitments made to the California owners of the
               California Oregon Transmission Project (COTP).  However,
               these incidents are not exactly the same as the incidents
               described in the NOPR, because NCPA is not one of the owners
               of the COTP.
,

                                        - 10 -

               provided that transmission be provided when it becomes

               actually available.  PG&E also requested substantial

               additional information, which NCPA considered beyond that

               reasonably necessary for a study, but still provided.  PG&E

               then determined that transmission was not available,

               reasoning that transmission was unavailable unless all the

               transmission requested could be provided 8760 hours per year

               without restrictions or limitations, extending through the

               expiration of the agreement in 2013.  NCPA 1988 Complaint at

               9.

                    2.  On November 27, 1987, NCPA made a new transmission

               request to PG&E, seeking 50 MW of bi-directional

               transmission at Midway.  NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex. 5.  On

               January 28, 1988, PG&E filed an interconnection agreement

               with Turlock Irrigation District (TID) that provided TID

               with 50 MW of bi-directional transmission at Midway.

               Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 42 FERC 4 61,406, order on

               reh'g, 43 FERC 4 61,403 (1988).  On February 22, 1988, PG&E

               advised NCPA that all firm transmission service available at

               Midway had been fully subscribed.  NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex.

               6.  Then, on March 29, 1988, PG&E filed with the Commission

               an interconnection agreement with Modesto Irrigation

               District (MID), that provided MID with 50 MW of bi-

               directional transmission at Midway.  Pacific Gas & Electric

               Company, 44 FERC 4 61,010 (1988).  At about the same time

               (in the last week in March 1988), PG&E advised NCPA that the
,

                                        - 11 -

               allocations of transmission to TID, MID, and others,

               including a not yet finalized allocation to Sacramento

               Municipality Utility District, had used all the transmission

               available at Midway.  NCPA 1988 Complaint, Exs. 7 and 8.

               D.  Northeast Utilities Service Company (NU)

               This is the case where Northeast Utilities acquired Public

          Service of New Hampshire (PSNH) (Docket No. EC90-10).  New

          England Power Company (NEP) witness Robert Bigelow's direct

          testimony expressed concern over the "relatively restrictive

          transmission policies of both" NU, on behalf of Northeast

          Utilities' public utility subsidiaries, and PSNH.  Bigelow Direct

          Testimony at 21 (filed May 25, 1990).  In his cross rebuttal

          testimony, Mr. Bigelow testified that "NU has a poor track record

          as a provider of transmission service" and "PSNH also has an

          abhorrent track record as a provider of transmission services."

          Bigelow Cross Rebuttal Testimony, at 3 (filed June 20, 1990).

          Mr. Bigelow described both NU's and NEP's (his own company)

          failure to provide service flexibility equivalent to their own

          use.  Except for NEP's TDUs, both NEP and NU historically

          provided only point-to-point transmission, which required

          separate scheduling for each transaction.  Bigelow Cross Rebuttal

          at 4.

               E.  Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and
                   Electric Company

               The evidence in this merger proceeding (Docket No. EC89-5)

          included testimony from a number of witnesses describing
,

                                        - 12 -

          instances of Edison's conduct.  Richard Greenwalt was the power

          supply supervisor for the City of Riverside, California.  He was

          responsible for scheduling all purchases of energy for Riverside

          and for the cities of Azusa, Banning and Colton, California.

          Greenwalt testimony at 1 (November 1989).  (These four cities and

          Anaheim, California, are collectively referred to as the Southern

          Cities or Cities.)  Joseph Hsu was the Director of Utilities for

          Azusa.  Hsu testimony at 1 (November 1989).  Gale Drews was the

          electric utility director of Colton.  Drews testimony at 1-2

          (November 1989).  Bill Carnahan was the director for Riverside.

          Carnahan testimony at 1 (November 1989).  Gordon Hoyt was the

          general manager of the Anaheim power department.  Hoyt testimony

          at 1 (November 1989).  Dan McCann was the power coordination

          supervisor for Anaheim.  He supervised Anaheim's load scheduling

          and is a former Edison employee, having worked for Edison for 20

          years.  McCann Testimony at 1-2 (November 1989).  These witnesses

          testified that Edison refused to wheel as follows.

                    1.  Edison's policy was to curtail the Cities any time

               it could be justified using any of a list of acceptable

               reasons to deny interruptible transmission service.  Id. at

               22-23.

                    2.  Edison would not generally provide transmission

               service when Edison could save money by itself purchasing

               the economy energy that would be wheeled.  McCann testimony

               at 19.  The Cities called Edison every hour to request

               interruptible transmission service.  Id..  Edison often
,

                                        - 13 -

               refused to sell energy available in the Western Systems

               Power Pool to the Cities and then made available higher cost

               contract energy or partial requirements service.  Id. at 19-

               20.

                    3.  When Anaheim requested Edison provide firm

               transmission of power from neighboring states, Edison would

               often agree to provide non-firm service but would not

               integrate the capacity for many years in the future, saying

               that its control area did not need capacity at that time.

               Hoyt testimony at 9.  Since the selling utility was

               interested in a sale of capacity, not just energy, the

               transaction would not occur.  Id.  Edison repeatedly used

               its control over transmission to deny Anaheim access to low-

               cost firm power.  Id. at 9-10.

                    4.  While Edison provided short-term firm transmission

               service to the Cities, it would only provide long-term firm

               service for three specific resources:  the SONGS nuclear

               plant, a specific IPP, and Hoover Dam power.  Hoyt testimony

               at 20.  One of Edison's reasons for denying long-term

               transmission was that Edison desired to reserve the

               transmission for its own future (unspecified) needs.  Id.

                    5.  In the 1970s, Edison refused to allow the Cities

               access to the Pacific Intertie.  Hoyt testimony at 21; Drews

               testimony at 7-8.

                    6.  In 1988, Edison refused to provide transmission

               service for a Cities power purchase from Public Service
,

                                        - 14 -

               Company of New Mexico (PSNM) from Palo Verde Nuclear

               station.  Hoyt testimony at 21.

                    7.  Edison has refused to provide requested firm

               transmission from

                    - California-Oregon border to Midway Station

                    - Nevada-Oregon Border to Sylmar Substation

                    - Palo Verde Switchyard to Vista

                    - SONGS Switchyard to Vista.

               Carnahan testimony at 15.

                    8.  Riverside requested transmission from Palo Verde

               and was told that such service was not available.  Carnahan

               testimony at 16.  Edison offered Riverside only 12 MW of

               curtailable transmission entitlement to provide Riverside's

               share of Palo Verde.  Id.  This service was neither large

                    enough or long enough, and Edison insisted on

                    unreasonable terms and conditions.  Id.

                    9.  Azusa, Banning and Colton had a contract with

               Edison that entitled them to use their Palo Verde firm

               transmission path to schedule energy to meet their contract

               energy obligation.  Edison refused to permit the three

               cities to use that path.  Edison did not contest that the

               contracts allowed this use, but said that the scheduling of

               such small amounts of energy for the three cities would be

               too burdensome.  Greenwalt testimony at 14.

                    10.  Edison would not respond in a timely manner to the

               Cities' requests, routinely taking months to respond.  Drews
,

                                        - 15 -

               testimony at 15.

                    11.  During the 1980s, Edison provided Colton with some

               transmission service to allow the Cities to reach certain

               suppliers, but limited the choices available to the Cities

               and imposed terms and conditions that increased the Cities'

               costs and placed Colton at a disadvantage against Edison.

               Drews testimony at 9.  Arranging alternative generation

               sources was difficult because the Cities always had to first

               get Edison to state whether it would provide transmission.

                    12.  During 1988 and 1989, a dispute arose between

               Edison and the Cities concerning the Hoover Uprating

               Project.  Drews testimony at 16.  Edison argued that for the

               months when units were out of service for uprating, and

               Southern Cities capacity was reduced to zero, Southern

               Cities would not receive an energy credit, even though

               energy was still available and used by Edison.  But the

               contracts allowed a participant who did not have capacity to

               still schedule its energy as non-firm energy on the capacity

               of another participant.  Id. at 16-17.

                    13.  In 1986, Azusa negotiated a power purchase

               contract with the California Department of Water Resources

               in increments of first 5 MW and then 2 MW (for a total of 7

               MW).  Hsu testimony at 14.  First Edison assured Azusa that

               the transmission for the additional 2 MW would not be a

               problem.  Id.  Then Edison would not agree to amend the

               transmission service agreement for the additional 2 MW.  Id.
,

                                        - 16 -

                    14.  In 1986, Azusa notified Edison of Special

               Condition 12 4/ purchases from PG&E and requested firm

               transmission service.  Id.  Two months before service was to

               begin, Edison notified the Cities of a problem with the

               transmission lines.  Id.  Transmission was eventually

               granted, but only after a four-month delay and substantial

               losses to the Cities.  Id.  Then Edison decided there was no

               problem with its transmission facilities.  Id. at 14-15.

                    15.  In 1986-87, the Cities purchased 20 MW from PG&E

               and 80 MW from Deseret G&T Cooperative.  Hoyt testimony at

               7-8.  Edison stated that without reinforcement of its

               transmission system, Edison would not provide the

               transmission.  Id.  There was a five-month delay during

               which the Cities were forced to purchase from Edison at a

               higher cost.  Id. at 8-9.  Then Edison decided that the

               transmission system did not need reinforcement.  Id. at 8.

                    16.  Edison also refused to provide a service priority

               equal to that of native load.  It would curtail the Cities

               in order to purchase more economy energy for itself.  McCann

               testimony at 28.  If Edison could make the purchase, it

               would curtail the City and use the energy for itself.  Id.

               When Edison curtailed the Cities, they were not able to

          4/   Special Condition 12 of the Integrated Operations Agreement
               between Edison and the Southern Cities defined certain
               Special Condition 12 resources and allowed the Cities to
               make certain uses of those resources, subject to certain
               restrictions.
,

                                        - 17 -

               purchase economy energy and instead purchased energy from

               Edison.  Id. at 24.

                    17.  According to Edison, the interruptible

               transmission it provided the Cities was interruptible for

               any reason.  Id. at 20.  A purchase could be terminated the

               hour after it is begun or even during the hour.  Id.  As a

               result, the Cities lost opportunities to make advantageous

               economy purchases.  Id. at 20-21.

                    18.  Edison also refused to provide customers

               flexibility similar to the flexibility Edison provided

               itself.  Edison's refusal to provide bi-directional

               transmission service restricted the Cities' abilities to

               purchase hydroelectric energy from the Pacific Northwest.

               Hoyt testimony at 22.  Because most contracts with Northwest

               utilities require a return of power, the Northwest utilities

               would not deal with the Cities without transmission to

               return energy.  Id. at 22-23.  Edison did provide bi-

               directional transmission to the Los Angeles Department of

               Water & Power (LADWP) to accommodate flows to and from

               Arizona.  Id.

                    19.  Riverside was unable to obtain non-firm service

               more than two hours in advance of need.  Carnahan testimony

               at 18.

                    20.  Riverside and Colton were both served out of

               Edison's Vista substation.  Although the two cities were on

               the same 69 kV bus, Edison would not allow them to sell
,

                                        - 18 -

               energy to each other.  Greenwalt testimony at 17.

                    21.  Riverside's agreement with Edison allowed

               Riverside to purchase a block of energy through the WSPP and

               divide it up among the four Cities (Azusa, Banning, Colton

               and Riverside).  Greenwalt testimony at 17.  When Riverside

               had excess energy from other sources, Edison would not

               permit it to sell that energy to the other three cities.

               Id.  For example, Riverside attempted to sell Deseret energy

               transmitted by LADWP to the Edison system.  Id. at 17-18.

               LADWP would not break out the Cities' shares of that energy,

               and Edison would not accept the energy as a delivery for all

               four cities.  Id. at 18.  Edison argued that because this

               energy was excess energy that Riverside could not use,

               Riverside did not have transmission rights to bring it into

               the control area.  Id.  As a result, Riverside paid for the

               energy delivered by LADWP to the Edison control area, but

               could not sell it to the other three cities, and gave it to

               Edison itself, which consumed the energy without making any

               payment for it.  Id.  Riverside tried a number of

               alternative paths, including using WSPP transmission where

               Riverside paid Edison 5 mills to connect to Azusa, 5 mills

               to connect to Banning, and 5 mills to connect to Colton for

               each megawatthour.  While this approach was successful for a

               while, eventually Edison refused to permit these sales.

                    22.  Edison claimed that the Cities only have

               transmission rights to bring in enough Special Condition 12
,

                                        - 19 -

               energy to satisfy the Cities' load.  Greenwalt testimony at

               18.

                    23.  Edison contended that the Cities' load

               requirements were satisfied first by integrated resources

               and then by Special Condition 12 and economy energy

               purchases.  Id. at 19.  When the Cities' integrated

               resources exceeded their load, any Special Condition 12

               resources became excess.  Under Riverside's Deseret

               contract, the Cities were required to take a minimum of 35

               MW each hour.  Id.  Edison acknowledged that it was

               obligated to buy, or allow the Cities to sell, any excess

               energy from Riverside's integrated resources.  Id.  However,

               Edison refused to give the Cities credit for excess Special

               Condition 12 energy brought into the area, claiming that the

               Cities could not have brought it in because they did not

               have transmission rights.  Id.

          II.  Other Examples of Transmission Disputes

               Disputes over transmission are not uncommon, contrary to

          EEI's suggestion.  Some recent examples taken from pleadings and

          other documents and from Commission orders reveal that it has

          been very difficult for various entities in the electric power

          industry to agree on transmission rights.  These examples also

          reveal that even after issuance of AEP and the Open Access NOPR

          with its proposed pro forma tariffs, there has been considerable

          controversy over whether various utilities' "open access" tariffs

          deviate from those tariffs.  (The Commission has allowed
,

                                        - 20 -

          utilities that adopt tariffs that match or exceed the non-rate

          terms and conditions in the NOPR pro forma tariffs to obtain

          certain benefits.)

                    A.  In a letter of February 3, 1995 to Mr. Gerald

               Richman of the Commission's Enforcement section in the

               Office of the General Counsel, Steven J. Kean, Vice

               President, Regulatory Affairs, Enron Power Marketing, Inc.

               (Enron) alleged that Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NiMo)

               refused to wheel power from Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E)

               to Enron under RG&E's transmission contract with NiMo;

               however, when Enron revealed the buyer, NiMo did wheel power

               for RG&E to the buyer.  Mr. Kean alleged that this was not

               an isolated incident.  NiMo argued that the contract did not

               require it to provide RG&E with transmission to Enron.  It

               also said that the principle of comparability does not

               require the service.  Letter of November 21, 1994 from NiMo

               representative A. Karen Hill to Gerald Richman.

                    B.  The Commission's Task Force Hot Line (Hot

               Line) received a complaint that a member of the New

               York Power Pool (NYPP) refused to transmit power that

               another member bought from a power marketer.  In a

               letter of November 17, 1994, from Chair Moler to Mr.

               William J. Balet, Executive Director of NYPP, Chair

               Moler explained that the Commission's enforcement staff

               had investigated and found the allegation to be true.
,

                                        - 21 -

                    C.  In Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency

               v. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), 73 FERC 4

               61,350 (1995), NSP and SMMPA had a contract under which

               NSP agreed to provide transmission service.  However,

               the parties had numerous disputes over the service.

               The Commission found that NSP had misinterpreted the

               contract in several ways.  For, example, SMMPA argued

               that it should be able to directly schedule its

               deliveries of energy out of the NSP control area and

               that it should not be limited to particular points of

               delivery.  NSP argued that only it was entitled to

               control the physical operation of scheduling.  The

               Commission found that the clear language of the

               contracts gave SMMPA the authority to schedule its own

               power.

                    D.  Mid-Continent Area Power Pool, 72 FERC 4 61,223

               (1995), involved MAPP's membership criteria, which made it

               impossible for a power marketer to join MAPP and obtain the

               benefits of certain transmission services available only to

               MAPP members.  The Commission found that the membership

               criteria may be unreasonable, particularly since there may

               be less burdensome ways of setting up membership criteria

               for non-traditional entities.

,


Shelley,
I was contacted by the generator work group to participate as a pipeline representative in the drafting of the straw man proposal on Tuesday (remember our generous offer of help?).  I guess that would also commit me to attending the Thursday session.

From:	Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/08/2001 01:48 PM
To:	Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Generator/Pipeline Discussions on Service Flexibility

Attached are official minutes of the 2nd Generator Pipeline meeting January 23, 2001.  The next session is scheduled for  Thursday, February 15, 2001 from 10:00 to 2:00 in Houston at Reliant's office in Houston at 1111 Louisiana Street.
The generator group is meeting on February 13 to redraft the straw man proposal.

Please let me know if your are planning to attend.  I need to send a listing of our attendees by February 12.


When would everyone like to get together to discuss?  Maybe we could all do
a little research and then meet (or conference call) early next week to
divide and conquer.

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA  94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:03 AM
To: tasker@haas.berkeley.edu
Cc: Anil Sama; Mark Guinney; Cvavrek
Subject: Group Project--E221

Greetings Professor:

Our group consists of Jeff Dasovich, Mark Guinney, Anil Sama and Carolyn
Vavrek.

We propose to examine the recently failed acquisition by Coke of Quaker
Oats:  Why merge?  What was the value?  Upside?  Downside?  Why did it go
bust?  Should it have gone through?  What's up with this Buffet guy,
anyway?

If you have any concerns with this proposal, please let us know.

Finally, if possible, we'd like to present on Thursday, April 26th.

Best,
Jeff
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"COOLEY, MATTHEW" <MCOOLEY@ridgways.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Taylor, Craig
Subject:	FW: ready for the next hunt

R. Matthew Cooley
Vice President - Marketing
Ridgway's Management Services
713-830-3935

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Anderson [mailto:Eric_Anderson@transwestern.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:00 AM
To: David Anderson (E-mail); COOLEY, MATTHEW; David Shavlan (E-mail);
Dan Boyles (E-mail); Weston Butler (E-mail); Monte Ezell (E-mail)
Subject: FW: ready for the next hunt

 - ATT00001.htm
 - rock103.com.afghanihunt.mp3


Please would you please provide a name within RBC for our Treasury group to
contact re. transfer of funds.

The full amount will be C$294,800,000 (interest rate swap cashflows will
require re-adjustment, Mike E has asked that these be forwarded to Tracy-RBC
internal Legal for interest rate schedule)

We would like C$235,840,000 to be transferred directly to Govt of Alberta on
behalf of Enron Canada Power
C$58,960,000 to Enron Canada.

Full detailed instructions will be provided by Laura Scott tel: 403 974 6728

As discussed with Mike, the interst rate swap will be fixed Thursday
afternoon, & funds transferred early on Friday 22

Regards,

Soma


Seen this one?


Lloyd,
Do I need to input security requests for this guy to get Enpower,  telephone,  etc?

JMF


Hi John, I hope all is going well.  I have heard lots of great things about
your on-line system.  I hope it is going well on your end.

I just wanted to touch base with you to see how you are doing with the
fundraising.  I find it a very humbling process asking people for money.
You should hit up Chris at Koch :)

Sheila

 - att1.htm


To all,

Mark Russ is representing one or more associate under your supervision.  We
need as soon as possible,  your prepared feedback and evaluation on each
associate you supervise.

You may e-mail or send via interoffice mail this information to either Mark
or myself.

Thanks for your prompt attention to this important matter.

Wilma J. Williams
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
PH:  713-853-6603
EB 4514


kate, i don't think this deal should have a broker.

kerri


Get ready.  Beginning in November, electronic pay stubs will be available to all employees who have their paychecks direct deposited into their bank account.  Electronic pay stubs are an easy, fast, and efficient way for you to get your payroll information.  They will also help Enron to realize a considerable savings in time and dollars spent over traditional printed pay stubs.

If you prefer to receive a hardcopy of your pay stub, click on the link below to complete a request form.  This form must be submitted to Payroll by October 15, 2001.  Unless you submit a form your pay stub information will default to electronic viewing.

Please click on the link below.

Name:             LARRY CAMPBELL
Personnel number: P00501496
Phone:            7138539351

If you have questions about electronic pay stubs, please contact Janice Priddy (Payroll) 713-853-7839 or Marie Newhouse (ClickAtHome) at 713-345-4185 or send an email to  Enron.Payroll@enron.com (Enron Payroll in Outlook).

Stay tuned for more details in the coming weeks.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0810709/i.asp?r=16972&s=FTNDNBJS&l=9


Janet,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


does it get any uglier than this?


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil43.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded43.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG43.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG43.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL43.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom1-9-02.pdf

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-9-02.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/04/99 11:13 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           10/27/99 02:46 PM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cross Timbers

I discovered it was a non-ISDA master, so I had to delete the weather.


Steve and Peter:  From a control point of view, we should have at least one
director based in Houston.  Does that present any significant tax risk?  Let
us know.  Mark Haedicke
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 11:11 AM -----

	Mark Powell
	05/01/2001 10:24 AM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Beth Apke/HOU/EES@EES, Morris Richard Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrew
Wu/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Canadian Retail

A.  Corporate Structure - To facilitate the meshing of EES' existing Canadian
affiliate (Enron Energy Services Canada Co. Ltd. ("EES Canada")) and Enron
Canada Corp.'s mass market retail venture (Enron Direct Limited Partnership
("Enron Direct Canada")), I propose a simple corporate structure as follows:

Enron Direct Canada's business will be set up as a subsidiary of EES Canada.
This will involve:
a. a general conveyance of the assets of Enron Direct Canada to its general
partner, Enron Direct Canada Corp.;
b. the sale of the shares of Enron Direct Canada Corp. from Enron Canada
Corp. to EES Canada; and
c.  a services agreement whereby Enron Canada Corp. provides key services to
Enron Direct Canada.

By setting up Enron Direct Canada as a distinct subsidiary of EES Canada,
both entities will continue to operate as they do today.

As such, (i) Enron Direct Canada will continue to be operated by the staff
currently in place in Calgary, but within the EES corporate structure, and
(ii) EES Canada's existing business will continue to be operated as it is
currently.

B.  Governance - I understand from Peter that a few years back, it was
decided, for corporate law and, more importantly, tax-related "permanent
establishment" issues, that all directors and officers of Enron Canada Corp.
would be Canadian-resident employees of Enron Canada Corp.  Accordingly,
Enron Canada Corp. was re-organized with a nominee board of directors now
consisting of Rob (as the senior Canadian commercial employee) and Peter (as
the senior Canadian legal employee) with officers being the Vice-Presidents
or Managing Directors in Canada responsible for the various commercial or
commercial-support groups.

Following this model, Rob Milnthorp and an employee from the legal department
would appear to be the appropriate directors of the EES' Canadian
subsidiaries.  In the short term, the Iegal employee/designee would be me;
however, the new lawyer hired to work for Enron Direct Canada would assume
the role.

With respect to the officers, no changes are required with respect to Enron
Direct Canada.  With respect to EES Canada, I propose that Rob be appointed
as the Chairman, President and CEO and I be appointed as Secretary for the
interim.

Unless I hear otherwise, I will proceed on the basis of these proposals.

Regards,

Mark Powell


Please plan on attending our third in a series of Credit/Legal seminars.
This seminar will be held tomorrow,  Wednesday, April 4th, from 2:00 - 3:30
p.m. in EB49c3 and will be a continuation of our discussion regarding the
Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement.  Refreshments will be provided.
Please e-mail my assistant, Becky Spencer, if you are unable to attend.


To Place an order . . .
PLEASE CALL 973-376-0005 ask for Order Dept.www.winelibrary.com
or e-mail us at swl@winelibrary.com
1. #16063 - Rotllan Torra 1997 Tirant - $89.99 (Only $71.99 when you buy a case)
95 points  Wine Spectator / Wine Library Super Tasting Star !
"Powerful and intense, this Spanish red is as ripe and rich as young Vintage Port, bursting with flavors of black cherries and blueberries, chocolate and coffee, supported by muscular yet round tannins. An impressive achievement in an age of blockbuster wines. Best after 2003. 500 cases made. (500 cases produced)." Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
2. #15993 - Cerro 1998 Manero ( Tuscan ) - $28.99 on sale
92 points Stephen Tanzer
Limit 2 6-packs per customer, this is a limited offer !!!
"Virtually impenetrable blackish-ruby. Potent, deep nose melds plum and berry fruit, oak spices and vanilla. Super-dense, powerful and mouthfilling; really coats the palate with flavor. Firm tannins add to the impression of structure. Long and sumptuous on the back end." Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
3. #16345 - Louis Bernard 1999 Chatenauf Du pape $26.99 (Only $21.59 when you buy a case)
92 Points Wine Spectator / Best Chat-Du-Pape buy in a long time
"Soft and smooth, a full-bodied, low-acidity beauty that coats the palate with its seductive flavors, cascading with roasted game, toasted coconut, ripe plum and blackberry complexity. Stunning red. Best from 2005 through 2020. 5,000 cases made." Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
4.  #15827 - Dominus 1998 Red - $84.99 On sale
91 Points Wine Spectator / Wine Library Super Tasting Star !
"Earthy, elegant and refined Cabernet blend, delivering layers of currant, tar, black cherry, cedar, coffee and anise, all sharply focused and framed by just the right amount of tannin. Drink now through 2009. 6,000 cases made." Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
5.  #14175 Behrens & Hitchcock 1999 Oakville "Fortuna" Merlot $65.99 (Only $52.79 when you buy a case)
90-92 Points  Robert Parker
"(500 cases of 100% Merlot) is a dense, very chewy merlot with oodles of smoky blackberry and cherry fruit. The wine is unctuously-textured, with plenty of glycerin, and a heady, concentrated finish. It will be delicious when released, and age well for at least 10-12 years." Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
6.  #15236 - Pepper Bridge 1998 Cabernet Sauvignon $63.99 (Only $51.19 when you buy a case)
The day after the "Super Tasting" people were calling like crazy for a few wines, however none more then this spectacular wine form Washington State. The 1998 pepper bridge is a massive, explosive, ripe fruit bomb. The 1998 vintage is one of the great in the Pacific North West's history. This wine is very limited so please act quickly if you were looking for it !  Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
*****************************
Hot Best Buy`s - Give these outstanding whites a try!
1.  #16151 - Defaix 1998 Chablis Petite $12.99 on sale -  reg. $19.99
Wow! This Petit Chablis is a stunning value, something not to be missed! Medium bodied with nice fruit . . . very easy drinking . . . an absolute steal for the money.If you are a chardonnay fan you will be blown away by this steal !  Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
2.  #16149 - Defaix 1997 Chablis "Cote De Lechet" $19.99 On Sale -  Reg $29.99
89 Points Robert Parker
"The sea breeze and lemon scented Chablis Cote de Lechet is a fat, ripe, medium to full bodied wine with richly strewn layers of pears, stones, and flint-like flavors. This lively wine was aged in 15% new oak barrels, and yet there are no traces of wood in either its aromas of character."  Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!
3.  #16148 - Herve Seguin 2000 Pouill Fume $14.99 on sale -  Reg $19.99
This wine made from 100% Sauvignon Blanc is clean, crisp and very well balanced. Tasted recently by our Wine Library staff and brought in based on it's lively flavor and value. If you enjoy wine to go with shell fish or salmon this is a great example of a super match ! Have your own tasting notes? Post your own review of this wine on Wine Library.com!


Have you reviewed that ladies resume that I gave you 2 weeks ago?

If so what do you think?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

Rognstad Helge <HRognstad@EUROMONEYPLC.COM> on 08/22/2000 09:24:29 AM
To:
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: FREE pensions and fund management news online

Dear Colleague,

I am pleased to announce that ii-Q.com, the connection for intelligent
investors, has now been launched and can be accessed free of charge at
http://www.ii-q.com - click on this link now for the very latest news -
updated throughout the day.

Multimedia interviews already on the site include webcasts from pensions
minister Jeff Rooker, David Willetts, the shadow social security secretary,
Nigel Thomas, fund manager at ABN Amro Growth Fund and Nick Fitzpatrick,
head of investment consulting practice at Bacon & Woodrow. Also at ii-Q.com,
you can access multimedia jokes from Phillip Warland, director general of
AUTIF and David Cranston, director general of NAPF!

In addition to the latest pension and fund news, ii-Q.com offers a
comprehensive investment mandate database, a training and events section, as
well as a wealth of publications from Euromoney Institutional Investor.

The ii-Q.com website specialises in high quality, multi-media content for
professional investors in the UK pensions and funds industries. It is led by
an award-winning editorial team of former Financial Times Group writers with
more than 25 years' experience at the top of specialist financial
journalism.

If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me
directly on +44 207 779 8764, or by e-mail at hrognstad@ii-q.com

Kind regards,
Helge Rognstad
Marketing Manager

ii-Q.com, the connection for intelligent investors http://www.ii-q.com

Data protection: ii-Q.com operates in accordance with the data protection
act. If you do not wish to receive further information from us, please send
this email back and type in "unsubscribe" in the subject window.

;e


Dan,

Today, I entered into some conversations with the City of Palo Alto regarding
fixing forward gas prices for them.  They have a copy of a Master agreement
and a copy of an ISDA which are currently in their legal department.  They
have requested a copy of the GTC language which would allow us to transact in
the immediate future, although I am still pushing for a Master.  They
currently have a Power Master in place with EPMI.

Could you forward a copy of the General Terms and Conditions to Monica
Padilla with the City of Palo Alto at Monica_Padilla@city.palo-alto.ca.us
first thing in the morning?  Please let me know if you have any questions or
issues.

Thanks,

Kim Ward

503-805-2117


Let me know if there is anything else I need to do to the breakout
agreements.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.Williams@enron.com [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com; Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: THOMAS CONSTANTINE; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com;
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com; michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com;
karla.hesketh@us.abb.com
Subject: GE and ABB B/O contract: Assignment and Assumption Agreement

I heard back from ABB this morning.  Karla Hesketh (ABB) is checking to
see
if any comments came in on the Assignment and Assumption Agreement.  We
should have the GE ready to go if , according to Dale, Rose and Lisa's
Global Finance comments are in.  Lee Johnson has said he is ready to go
to
the office and sign for GE.

In the realm of a checklist that I am tracking for Jim Gilbert on the
EPC
contract owner required information being ready to go, these 2 documents
(E-Next B/O Contracts for LVCII on both ABB and GE; same for the
Assignment
and Assumption Agreements) are the keys to meeting our obligations.  All
other requirements are in place and on hold pending the trigger being
pulled on the tolling agreement and subsequent dash approval.

I am trying to coordinate for Dale as he is still in Denver, under sleep
deprivation.  Let me know how  I can help.

Regards

Bill W.
503-464-8958
503-704-9801 (cell)


-----Original Message-----
From: O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:09 PM
To: Cavanaugh, Darren; Sarnowski, Julie; Emmert, Caroline; Thompson,
Virginia
Cc: Baughman, Edward
Subject: FW: CAISO Notice: Weekly ISO Operations Conference Calls

All,

We need to be on these weekly conf. calls.

It is now more important than ever that we stay up on all ISO current events.

MO

-----Original Message-----
From: CRCommunications [mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:49 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
Subject: CAISO Notice: Weekly ISO Operations Conference Calls

MARKET NOTICE
May 15, 2002
Weekly ISO Operations Conference Calls
ISO Market Participants:
Attention: Operations Personnel
Beginning May 22, the ISO will host a weekly conference with ISO Operations
staff, Scheduling Coordinators, Municipal Utilities, IOUs and other control
areas to review and discuss current operational issues.
The ISO's objective for these calls is to provide a forum for discussion of
current operational issues.  We will begin the calls with a review of any
current operational issues at the ISO and provide time for feedback from
participants on these issues. Then participants will have an opportunity to
raise operational issues from their viewpoint.
The calls will be open to anyone, but will likely be most useful to
operations managers, forward market and real time schedulers and other
personnel involved with unit dispatches.  We anticipate that Generators,
Municipal Utilities, IOUs, and other control areas will participate.
The first call will be held Wednesday May 22 from 11 AM to noon (PST)
Subsequent calls will be held every Tuesday from 1:30 to 2:30 (PST) from May
29 to June 25.  In late June we will evaluate the calls with participants to
determine whether and how best to continue this dialogue, especially during
the summer.
The call in information is: 877-670-4111 Passcode 589314
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact
Sue Happ at shapp@caiso.com or (916) 608-7059.
Client Relations Communications.0920
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


th e attachment you sent wont open. can you send another.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cavazos, Virginia
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Will, Lloyd; Storey, Geoff; Luce, Laura; Milnthorp, Rob; Greenberg, Mark; Weatherspoon, Patricia; Scribner, James; Hedstrom, Peggy; McKeel, Richard
Cc:	Wong, Joe
Subject:	FW: ENA IT 2002 Budgets

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wong, Joe
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Cavazos, Virginia
Subject:	ENA IT 2002 Budgets

This document contains information for our IT Budget review meeting scheduled for this Wed. at 1:00.  Most people will be calling in via a conf. call (see meeting notice for details); otherwise it is in ECN 1835.

Objectives - review part of the 2002 IT costs & allocations for ENA, answer any questions, and obtain your approval to proceed with these projects.

The attached spreadsheet contains all the IT projects being allocated to ENA.  We will only review the projects in blue.  The list contains the name of the project (column C), Project Description (column D), Allocation Basis (column N), EA Allocation % (column O), and Costs being allocated to EA (column P).

Thanks.  Joe.
 << File: ENA Project Review.xls >>


Attached is the most recent draft of the guidelines.  Please let me have your
comments.  Sara

Lynn Aven@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/27/99 05:59 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Argentina Trader Guidelines

Sara:  I probably have them somewhere but if you could forward to me the
latest guidelines, I will look at them and we can discuss.  All I remember
looking at was a marked up copy that you had while we were in Sao Paulo.

Lynn

Sara Shackleton@ECT
12/20/99 04:20 PM
To: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Argentina Trader Guidelines

Lynn:  Weren't you going to take a look at the Trader Guidelines for
Argentina?  Let me know if you have any questions or if I can help you
further.  Thanks.  SS


Below, is an attachement of a Daily Risk Reporting Checklist for Book
Administration.  The checklist was developed as an aid in helping ensure
books are officialized.  If you have any suggestions on making this checklist
more comprehensive please advise.

Thank You

Joel
---------------------- Forwarded by Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000
12:03 PM ---------------------------

Connie Sutton@ECT
11/06/2000 03:13 PM
To: Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BA Daily Checklist


Hi Heather,

The next i2 Board of Directors, Compensation Committee and Audit Committee
meetings (after the Oct 23rd meeting) are scheduled for Tues, January 16,
2001, at 8:00 a.m.  With the exception of the January 2001 meeting, no
others have been set.  After we receive our 2001 Earnings Release dates we
will schedule the Audit Committee and i2 Board of Directors meeting dates.

NOTE:  Effective immediately, Keith Larney (469-357-4497) and his
assistant, Shea Dugger (469-357-4195) of Legal will be taking over the i2
Board of Directors, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee meeting
responsibilities.

I will be collaborating with them on the October 23 meeting but if you have
any questions or concerns, please contact Keith or Shea.

Thanks!

Barbette Joy Watts
Executive Assistant to David Becker
One i2 Place, 3rd Floor
469-357-3460 (Direct)
469-357-6769 (Fax)
barbette_watts@i2.com

                    Heather_Dalto
                    n@Dell.com           To:     Barbette_Watts@i2.com
                                         cc:
                    10/09/00             Subject:     Board dates
                    08:19 AM

Hi Barbette-

Can you send me the dates for any upcoming Board mtgs?  I'm going over
Tom's
calendar w/ a fine tooth comb & want to make sure that what we have is
correct.

Thanks!
Heather


Mark,

I left you a message regarding The National Forum on Corporate Finance
at  Rice.

They would be delighted if you could serve as a panel  member
at this conference.

Here are the coordinates of the professor at Rice who
is in charge. I would appreciate if you could call him
and let him know if you can attend.

Thanks.

Vince

Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


Mike:
Here are the questions for the Lincoln Energy Center facility.  Please give
us a call if you have any questions.
Ben


Sorry I just sent you an E-mail in error.  Please ignore.


If you look at the attached list we are due to make a lot of these dates in
the next two weeks.  The biggest problem in Europe is probably that Edmund is
obviously out of the office and there are no dates even for his.

These delays are causing chicken and egg problems with the metals customers.
We can't mail if there are no pas etc.  The big metals roll-out is in London
first week in October so we do need them by then,

If there are re-prioritisation issues please contact Bruce Garner who needs
them for that week.

Please let me know.

Thanks

Louise

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
15/09/2000 11:46
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Naveed
Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EnronOnline New Markets/Products Weekly Update 9/8/00

Attached please find the latest version  of the New Markets/Products Report.
The report is updated every week.

Let me know if you have any questions

Thank you!

Leonardo Pacheco


Scott:
Thanks.  I'll let you know when a time has been sent out.  On your mark-up,
could you please call Rick and let him know that we also need to take out
"Approved Transaction Counterparty" from Section 6.1(a) as we have addressed
that now in the Force Majeure definition.   Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"SCOTT AVITABILE" <SAVITABI@LLGM.COM>
	06/26/2000 05:58 PM

		 To: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, "JOHN McGREEVY" <JMCGREEV@LLGM.COM>, "PAUL
BRUCE WRIGHT" <PWRIGHT@LLGM.COM>
		 cc: <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Ace Call

Its good for me.

>>> "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 06/26/00 06:56PM >>>

Guys:
Looks like the ACE folks are not available tomorrow.  Would a call with them
on
Wednesday morning at 9 (Houston time) work?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Guys,

Mike wanted me to forward this message to you both.

Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: Bledsoe, Michael [mailto:Michael.Bledsoe@ca.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Ring, Richard; RStandley (E-mail); Rfisher2 (E-mail); dj (E-mail);
Mike Carville (E-mail); Paula Sutphen (E-mail); Lori Winter & Joe
Aksentowitz (E-mail); David Vaughn (E-mail); Stephanie Davis (E-mail)
Subject: Superbowl Party and Fish Fry

Super Bowl Party!

When:		Feb 3rd at 3pm, the game starts at 5pm
Where:	16319 Hickory Point Rd

What:		Bring something to drink and optionally your favorite dip

Fish, Potato Salad and Fun in abundance.

The perfect combination will take place on Feb 3rd at the Bledsoe residence.  We are combining a Fish Fry with the big game.  Due to the fantastic fishing the past few months the freezer is full of Trout and Redfish and it's time to make some room for the excellent fishing coming up in the next few months.  Please RSVP via email or call 281-855-4252 so we have an idea of how much fish to cook.

Looking forward to seeing everyone and having fun with the football and commercials!

Mike Bledsoe
FSG Regional Manager - Mavericks
Michael.Bledsoe@ca.com
Office     713-625-9461
Fax          713-561-9980
Pager      877-461-4383
Alpha     888-BEEP-CAI
Cell         832-656-1189


Attached is the latest risk policy from Peoples.  It appears that they have
only made the one change that is highlighted.  However, I would request that
we all re-read the policy in its entirety to ensure that there are no other
changes which are not highlighted.  Vlady - here are some thoughts on your
comments.

1 - Stop limit size.  I don't think we will be succesful in trying to change
this at this point.  Peoples Board has been presented with the $10 million.
As we discussed, there can be no actions taken by the risk committee unless
unanimous and we can always try to change it once we get going.
2 - I changed Appendix I to reflect a Stop Loss Trigger limit determination
period of each fiscal year.
3 - There are no differences in notifications for the 50% and 75% levels.
The easiest thing to do may be to handle this internally if we want a
different notification at the higher threshhold.  It does not need to be a
formal part of enovate's policy unless we feel it absolutely necessary.
4 - The VaR language you provided has been incorporated as Appendix IV.

Overall, there have not been many changes.  I would like to get final
comments, subject of course to Peoples changing their minds on something, as
soon as possible.  My goal is to execute this policy the first part of next
week.  Let me know if this is practical.

Thanks,

Gregg


Phillip/Mike -

Per my earlier e-mail...

Additionally, this candidate currently works in our London office as an Analyst and is looking to come over to the Houston office.  We would like to get him into the November 1st interviews.

His contact information is on the resume, but here is his number as well
+ 4 4  ( 0 )  2 0  7 7 8 3  5 5 5 8   .

Thanks!

Adrianne
x57302
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Grigsby, Mike
Subject: Another ENA Trading Track Candidate

Hi Phillip and Mike!

Is there any way you could contact the below candidate for the ENA TRading Track?

I appreciate your extra effort!

Kind regards,

Adrianne
x57302


Bob -

My initial response is that the amendment can be provided.  I am not sure,
however, that we satisfy the rationale behind the collateral/lc by doing
this.  Remember, until the counterparty actually confirms with Enron (or
performs the transaction), Enron does not maintain any direct contractual
relationship with the Counterparty.  All Enron has is a confirmation from the
broker, the party with whom we have contracted through the BrokerClient
product.  In this situation, both the broker and Enron are really in the same
position as if the transaction were a telephone trade by a broker.

I will give this a bit more thought and discuss possible options with Mark.
Maybe it is as simple as obtaining a document from the counterparty under
which they acknowledge (1) the broker is authorized to act on its behalf, (2)
the relationship is truly one of agent and principal such that the actions of
the broker (e.g., transacting online) are really the actions of the
counterparty and (3) the counterparty agrees to be liable to Enron as if the
counterparty had, itself, performed the transaction online.  The last point
could be used to tie any breach of a transaction to the master
agreement/GTC's between Enron and the counterparty - the same method that is
currently employed to calculate the Liquidated Damages under the BETA.

Let's talk further next week after I have discussed this with Mark.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Bob Shults@ECT
	04/06/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg
		 cc:
		 Subject: Broker Client

Andy and I have worked to come up with a way to give the Brokers a greater
incentive to execute via Broker Client.  To date we have only had 7
executions.  4 out of the 5 Brokers have not even given us security yet and
are therefore not able to execute.   What we would like to do is draft an
amendment that would have the brokers warrant that they have confirmed with
the counterparty.  We will be willing to free them from responsibility under
the liquidated damages (assuming no fraud, misrepresentation...) once they
have confirmed each day.  We would expect them in return that the broker use
all means possible to help us get the counterparty to perform.  Andy would
like me to implement this by April 15th.  Can you draft an amendment to do
this.


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
	Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
	Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
	YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer browser, 5.0 or higher.


This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

This looks fine to me.
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn [mailto:CCampbell@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:30 AM
To: 'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'; 'iparker@freshfields.com'
Cc: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Subject: Salmon LLC Agreement

<<2XFNRED.DOC>>  <<2XFN08!.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

Enclosed are clean and blacklined copies of the final draft of the First
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement.  The blackline
reflects changes from the 4-04-01 draft which was attached as Exhibit A to
the letter agreement.  The only outstanding matter is to fill in three blank
dates on pages 1, 2 and A-3.  Please review and advise of any comments.
Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures 136643v8
136643vR8/7

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011002.txt


I updated the Transco rates and fuel for April.  It is in the "Offseason
Rate" tab in the "2000tran03" file.


Hi Stacey,

Zhiyun Yang has given me your e-mail address recently.

I am interested in your company and would like to meet with you to discuss
my background and possibility of joining Enron.  My background is diverse: I
have five years of experience in financial analysis in banking industry and
three years of Risk Management at PacifiCorp.  I also have strong computer
skills and I am a problem solver.  In terms of education, I am pursuing MS
in Decision Analysis at Portland State University.  I am looking for a
position utilizing my analytical and computational skills at a dynamic
company such as Enron.

Thank you for your time and I am looking forward hearing from you.

 <<Hasnah Mat-Amin.doc>>

 - Hasnah Mat-Amin.doc


Joseph,

Can you work with Sue to set up a meeting?  Anytime 1 p.m. or later is ok
with me.  Call should include Hartsoe, Alverez (works for Hartsoe), Mary
Hain, Steffes (if available).

Alan Comnes

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/20/2001 09:50 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Draft FERC Comments

Let's get together later today on the phone and discuss where we are with
EPSa, WPTF and what if anything enron should file.  ALso new guy in DC office
-- Ray alvarez -- need to get him involved

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 09:49 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/19/2001 06:03 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <MMilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<mark_j_smith@fpl.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <steve.huhman@mirant.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <bzycher@rand.org>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, <roger.pelote@williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft FERC Comments

Attached is a preliminary first draft of the WPTF comments to be filed on
Thursday with regard to the FERC Staff's market monitoring proposal.? It is
essentially based on Ben Zycher's draft paper concerning this issue.? Ben
has made a number of astute economic arguments in response to their
proposal.? In several areas, questions?are indicated, or a suggestion  that
there is a need for additional material to support the statements  made.?
?
It would be helpful to see the drafts in progress by other WPTF  members.? By
reviewing them we can make sure that inconsistent observations  are not made
and WPTF's own filing can be enriched by additional policy  arguments
concerning the staff proposal.
?
Dan
 - 3-22-01 WPTF Comments - Draft 1.doc


Gary's letter responding to a series on "poor Edison" in the LA Times.  I
reviewed it in advance -- looked good to me.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 08:27 AM -----

	Gary Ackerman <foothillservices@mindspring.com>
	05/15/2001 11:36 PM
	Please respond to foothillservices

		 To: letters@latimes.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter in re "Edison's Agony"

To the Editor;

The series of articles published last week by Ms. Cleeland called "Edison's
Agony" continues your unbroken string
of balanced and informative reporting on the California energy crisis.  My
group of merchant generators and power
marketers include many pre-competition Edison empoyees, and employees from
other utilities as well.  We are
sympathetic to the situation of those who currently serve under the Edison
banner.

We note, however, that something is amiss in your series, and only lightly
touched.  That is, the role of SCE in
advancing the legislation and policies in favor of competition in Californa.

It was SCE, and its CEO Mr. Bryson who masterminded the state deregulation
legislation.  Although SCE's Mr.
Bryson  objected vigorously to forced sales of power plants, and asked for
long terms power purchase contracts, those
lost battles gave way to winning the stranded-cost-recovery war.

SCE did well in adopting to the new reality, until the wholesale rates flew
up, and left the utility unable to recover its
costs.  SCE made a deliberate calculation in May of 2000 to leave its
customers unprotected from cost shocks.  There
was no hedging undertaken for future power purchases when the wholesale
forward prices exceeded SCE's historical
generation component of rates.  As a result, the debts piled up.

Empathize with career employees of SCE, and with dedicated, hard working
linemen who are always ready to serve at
the cost of their private pleasures. But please, get it right.  Much of this
misery was the avoidable direct consequence
of actions taken by, not avoided, by the SCE management team.

Gary B. Ackerman
Executive Director
Western Power Trading Forum
6155 Almaden Expy, Suite 230
San Jose, CA 95120

650-324-3250


Your comments are needed for Carla Harris who sat in for Keegan Farrell on September 1st.  Please return as soon as possible.  Thank you!-Becky

Ratings: Excellent = 5 Above Average = 4 Average = 3 Below Average = 2 Poor = 1

Initiative:		_________
Cooperation:	_________
Punctuality:	_________
Attendance:		_________
Quality of Work:	_________

Rate the worker's skill level in relation to the job :_________

Would you request this person again? (Y/N) :_________

Comments:


Dr. Henao - 713-467-2800
Dr. Goffman - 713-467-0990

Killian Gilbert-Smith
713-525-5416

E-Mail Disclaimer

Note:  This e-mail message and all attachments are intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the
intended addressee, please contact the sender and delete the
information from your computer.  If you are not the addressee of
this message, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute
it.  No opinion expressed or implied by the sender necessarily
constitutes the opinion of the company or its affiliates.


Dale:
I will be sending you the CA's some time this morning.  I needed to wait till
we had our conference with the investment bankers, CSFB, to know which
companies were going to the second round.  I did not want to send you the
CA's of companies that were not going on to the second round.  Please give me
a call if you have any questions.
Ben


i heard langley is out for the year.  who will fill that gap?


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040714.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  21.59)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DANTE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  13.60)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   5.09 / Final:   4.70)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  46.55 / Final:  42.15)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 09:58 AM
---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman on 05/17/2000 09:19 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Here's the list of the Software Licenses Needed for NetCo showing the detail break out of the Total # Instances between User, Server, and Other.

(A few sections still need the instances broken down by type and we'll include them as soon as they're available.)

For the Oracle database products we've included a separate tab with the specific details which apply there.

Steve


We believe the password would have been sent to Mark Haedicke.  He will be
back in the office tomorrow and Janette will try and locate it for us when he
gets in.

	Carol St Clair
	01/24/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Opinions

Tana:
Last week Mark circulated a memo concerning the new ISDA Opinions that are
now available on the ISDA website until the end of January.  Can you find out
what our ID and Password are so we can access them?  Given Mark's illness,
I'm not confident that this is something that he will be able to look into
before the deadline.

.Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Fran-

Stacey showed me a gas book request that you'd sent looking for a book code.  We are working on figuring out how to do all that, so just hang tight and we'll let you know.

Thanks!

Andrea


Mary:  We deleted this counterparty from the legal/credit list yesterday.
Since commercial is not pushing, we determined that it would be imprudent to
hire outside counsel at this time.  Sara


So are you not talking to me anymore or something?  I emailed once and called
twice in the past week and a half  and haven't heard back from you?


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hour beginning 05:00 in the April 28, 2001 Real-Time
Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify prices:

PJM: 01:00, 03:00, 04:00, 06:00 and 21:00
HQ:  06:00 and 21:00
OH:  06:00 and 21:00
NE:  06:00 and 21:00

Prices in the April 29, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be found
at
the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2001 05:27 PM -----

	Margaret.Allen@enron.com
	02/08/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: mark.palmer@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Media info

Mark, let me know if this is what you were looking for:

   $2Million on 1st Quarter buy-- $1.5M on National Cable and $.5M on spot
   Working with EMS, we received a 100% increase in value on the national
   buy and 66% increase in value on the spot buy
   National Cable buy includes CNN, CNNfn, CNBC, ESPN, Fox News, Discovery
   Cannel and The History Channel
   Our spot buys cover NY, DC and Houston on CBS and ABC


Could you please forward my "P" number.  I am unable to get into the XMS
system and need this ASAP.

Thanks for your help.


Hi Stacy,

I don't know if Jeff or Debra mentioned this to you, but this is a master we
need in place in connection with a gas/power asset management arrangement
with the cities of Yazoo City and Clarksdale Mississippi.  As you can see,
Jeff suggested you take a look at it before it is sent to the customer.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 08:31
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
05/14/2001 09:57 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale Master Gas Agreements

Kay:

That would be great.

Jeff

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/14/2001 08:44 AM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale Master Gas Agreements

Hi Jeff,

Did you want Stacy to take a look at this?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 08:43
AM ---------------------------

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
05/11/2001 05:04 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale  Master Gas Agreements

Attached are drafts of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for gas.  Upon
completion of a guaranty I will incorporate a section for same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


can you supply us with a post_id for
The report  RSR0500 and RSR0503_CONS
so we may see how long it will take to do the changes
you requested.
Francis


here is the file you requested.  Thanks for your help.
PL


Jeff,

     Thanks again for taking the time to meet with Alfredo and I yesterday.
We felt the meeting was very useful and informative.  Talk with you soon.

Mark


Maureen,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
08:37 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Carson@ENRON
02/22/2000 01:51 PM
To: Beth Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Speakers for a CEO Meeting with Governor Johanns

Beth  I do not have  any experience  with the  agri-business  energy sector
supply and price  impacts but someone in
Vince Kaminski
s  group  might??? Please  Try  him.  regards  Margaret


Per my fax (37 pages) of 8/29/99, attached are copies of (1) the existing and
proposed Annex A (general terms for the omnibus) and (2) proposed option
formats for ISDA and omnibus.  My purpose was to "ISDAize" the omnibus
particularly in the cap/floor/collar world.  Please note the Par.2 Payment
section and revised definitions.  You do not have "old" confirm templates
because I cannot acces on my computer (but all was included in the fax). Did
you receive the fax?   SS


EOL and Peoples transaction explain year and quarter.  The biggest reason is
EOL.  I think the month to date numbers are up because we are experiencing an
increase in EOL trading in the Gulf Coast Region.  Let me know if you need
more info.

Hunter


Professor Vincent Kaminski
Vice President of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Professor Kaminski

    I , Masayuki Fujita was the only Japanese attendee of the Energy
Derivatives seminar
in Houston last December and a member of Japanese consultation firm:
Mitsubishi Research
Institute, Inc. I would be very honored if you can meet with me 17 or 18
April after
attending Energy Trading Summit in 12th-14th. As you know, Japanese
electricity trading is
on the way of deregulation beneficial to the consumers from a long stage of
the nine major
companies' regional monopoly. We are giving a hand to help the Ministry and
industry to
find the right course of them. I and my colleague Yamada, who will attend Risk
Publications Monte Calro seminar in Four Seasons Hotel, would like to visit
you and your
company for studying the sophisticated risk management at Enron. In return,
we may give
you the information about recent institutional progress and major electricity
companies
response in Japan.

    We are now personally translating your book "Managing Energy Price Risk"
second
edition and wondering if you have not given the right to publish in Japanese
and nay give
us the chance to help you introduce modern technology to manage energy risk
in the
Japanese energy industry.

    I do not hope Japanese English power prevent me to pass my sincerity to
you and I can
visit you soon.

    Best regards,

Masayuki Fujita
Principal Financial Engineer
Financial Technologies Section
Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
3-6 Otemachi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-8141
Japan
Tel +81-3-3277-0582
Fax +81-3-3277-0521


Carol:

Have you had a chance to recap our "offsite" discussion?

Also, what can you tell me about Montana Power Company (1st draft ISDA)?

Stop by in the a.m regarding exercise of your swaption.  What does your
confirm say about the form of notice of exercise and the exercise date (or
period)?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Pumpkin recipe dip attached.

Absolutely - I would love for you to continue on the newsletter for next year.  Perhaps you would consider being the official Editor for next year?  That is the job that you are really doing!

Meagan sent her application in to OU today.  It's one of four schools to which she will apply, so nothing definitive yet.  But it is nice to get one out the door!  --Sally

My assistant is faxing the two pages regarding news from national.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rgladstein@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October  23, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Re: November Newsletter Deadline

Sally - We can probably use the pumpkin dip recipe; with so many ads we may need 2 pull-out pages (calendar/minutes being one).  Plus, it would be great for everyone to have it for the upcoming holidays.
Faxing or email will be the best way to get info to me today - it's back-to-back dentist appointments, manicures (my indulgence!), tumbling, cheerleading, etc. so I will out more than I'm in.
I really enjoy the newsletter and will be happy to remain in this position for next year (if you'd like me to!).  With my advertising/journalism background - although it's been a lot of years since I've used it very much - this is just my "thing".  And with such rapid changes in technology, it's a challenge to learn new skills!
Have a great day, and I'll look for the additional info - Thanks!  Robin


Attached is a matrix of Order 637 issues by intervenor/customer indicating which issues they protested.  Along with Teb's outline being prepared, I thought this might be useful as an at-a-glance sheet for each customer especially prior to any informal meetings that may be held before filing revisions to our original proposal.  If you have any questions, please give me a call.  gh


Currently, I am receiving exception reporting from many of your groups in
EXCEL.  We have started to build a database to replace the EXCEL reporting.
In order to make the reporting easy on you we would like to build the
database around your current systems.  In order to do this, you and people in
your groups will be receiving calls from Kelly Tisman, who is responsible for
building the database.  Please make some time to show her your systems and
needs as far as the reporting is concerned.

Attached is the list of people she is planning to contact.  If it needs
updated, please let Kelly know.

Thanks

Shona


Can you help out my buddy Mike?  He will probably take us out for a fabulous
lunch.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000 11:48
AM ---------------------------

Michael H Garred@EES
07/26/2000 10:46 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Contacts

Do you have contacts and phone's # for Sonat and for East Tennessee pipes?

Thanks buddy.
mhg


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa; Lucci, Paul T.; Felling, Amy; Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: fundies packet


Hi all,

I hope the Financial Times has been working with you to get the paper
delivered to you. For those of you who are still having trouble, I have
arranged for 20 papers a day to come to the Evening MBA Program office as a
work-around for the rest of the term.  We will keep a few days worth as
space allows.

Please follow a couple of ground rules so that this will work for everyone:
*Please be considerate and only take a paper if you are sure that you did
not receive one at home. Do  not take one just because you left yours at
home. If you want to review the paper at Haas before class, please use the
Web or the Long Library copies.
*In the event of a delivery problem, please call or e-mail the Financial
Times (see below), unless they have just told you that they cannot get the
paper to you. In this case, ask FT to mail the paper to you instead of
reluctantly trying to get a carrier to go to your house.
*Be patient if you come to the office and we have run out of papers. We
will try to increase the number of back-ups if necessary.
*When you come to the office to pick up a paper we will have a list for you
to record the missed delivery. Please help us to track the problems.

We received our first papers today and have last Friday's as well.

For contacting the Financial Times in the event of problems or address
changes, please ask for Gayle at:  FT Education [fteducation@etcdata.com]
or (800) 628-8088.

I hope this is helpful to those of you who have had severe problems with
the paper.

Have a great SHORT week and a happy Thanksgiving.

-Shawn

_________________________________________
Shawn Allison, Associate Director
Evening MBA Program, Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Tel (510) 643-0435 Fax (510) 643-5902


- xmassuit.gif