Unless there have been recent changes of which I am unaware, a "gas day" runs
from 8:00 a.m. on one day until 8:00 a.m. on the next day.  Based on this
premise, I need to get a clarification of what you actually mean when you do
a termination letter stating that a contract will be terminated on the first
of a particular month.

As the systems currently work, if a termination date is entered as the first
of any month, the deal is rolled over in Sitara for the ENTIRE month.

If Sitara was changed to better read the dates from Global Contracts, it
would still roll the deal over & allow gas to flow through the 1st (which
would actually be until 8:00 a.m. on the 2nd).

When you terminate a contract on the first of any month:

Do you mean that gas should only flow through the end of the previous month
(which would end at 8:00 a.m. on the 1st of the next month)?

or

Do you mean that gas should flow through the end of the 1st day of the month
(which would end at 8:00 a.m. on the 2nd of the month)?

or

Can it be either, based on the individual situation?  (If so, please explain.)

Please let me know your views on this issue.  I have requested the IT group
to change all of the "1st of a month" termination dates in Global Contracts
to the last day of the previous month in order to prevent Sitara from
assuming that the deal is good for the entire next month.  But, before they
act on this request, we want to make sure that we are interpreting the
meaning correctly.

Thanks in advance for your help.


Attached, please find the "West Desk Organizational Chart".  Please note,
this is chart is for "internal use" ONLY!

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/01/2001 03:35 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

Ginger,

Can you circulate the attached chart to Government Affairs staff.  The
subject line should read "West Desk Organizational Chart."  Please put in the
cover note that the chart is for internal Enron use only.

Thanks,

Alan Comnes

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nicolay, Christi
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:13 AM
To: Comnes, Alan
Subject: RE:

Alan -- Can you send an email to Ginger Dernehl (for distribution to gov't
affairs) that lists the heads of the various desks in West Power?  I've had
some questions from people wanting a list.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001
08:08 AM ---------------------------
From: Debra Davidson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 06:30 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE:

No, we have nothing like this for West Power Trading.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nicolay, Christi
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Davidson, Debra
Subject:

Do you have a similar chart for West Power?  We found this very helpful for
Gov't Affairs people to assist trading better.  Thanks.

 << File: EastPwrOrg_0501.ppt >>


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 12:47
PM ---------------------------
From: Colleen Sullivan on 03/30/2000 12:23 PM
To: mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: storage clarification & issues

Regarding your memo below, following is a status on those items:
1, 2:  The pricing and consistency in pricing for handling intra-month
changes does appear to be an issue.  Since the contract didn't spell out in
detail location by location pricing (and I think intentionally so), we
believe the best way to handle this for April forward is to agree monthly
(during bid week) of the process and pricing for each location.  I know Chris
Germany has prepared a proposal that I think he has discussed (generally, not
specific numbers) with Brian, Doug and Charlie.  I will ask that he forward
this proposal TODAY and finalize the process for April ASAP.  Let me know if
you do not think a monthly process of agreeing to the changes is sufficient.

3.  Local production - unfortunately I think we have opened a can of worms
here.   Here is what is happening:  Your people are nominating this
production (we are not even set up to do behind the citygate nominations),
but the contracts were assigned to us in the Wholesale transaction.  That
means they were valued by us and put into our system at a value.   We are
reviewing this detail now and are finding quite a few discrepancies between
the prices that were listed on the Wholesale Deal List and the actual
contract prices with the producers.  So, this is one issue we will have to
address as indemnification items.  That's problem one.  Problem two is that I
am assuming you all would like this production back since you are doing all
the nominations.  We need to work on a solution for doing this (if that is
what you want).  For Jan, Feb & Mar, however, it appears that we will be the
ones paying the producers, so we will need to get volume information from
your schedulers in order to get this billed and payed for properly.   I'll
follow up with more information on this in the next couple of days.

4.  Monthly invoices - regarding the pipeline demand charges, it sounds like
Chris has been trying to verify all the charges before he sends copies of the
pipeline invoices on to you.  Maybe we should change this process to one
where he sends them to you as soon as he gets them instead of waiting on his
confirmation and review of all the charges.  This means you may see quite a
bit of incorrect data, but at least you'll have something.  Let us know what
you would prefer.  Regarding the January invoice specifically, I do know that
the Columbia Gulf and Columbia Gas packet of pipeline invoices was mailed to
your office yesterday, March 29.  Chris will get all remaining demand charge
statements to your office by Wednesday, April 5, and all corrections he is
aware of as of this date by Friday, April 7.  I apologize for the delay.

5.  Swap confirmations - I spoke with Jeff Hodge and he believes he has a
packet of all the confirms--he is in Calgary today and will be back on
Monday.  Is that soon enough for this to be sent to you?  If not, please
advise and I'll see if his assistant can search for this data.

Thanks for clarifying the storage proxy schedule with the remaining inventory
balances.

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:43:55 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

I forgot the storage attachment ...
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/28/2000 01:42 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Flewellyn
03/28/2000 01:32 PM

To: colleen.sullivan@enron.com@internet
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa

 - storage proxy.xls


The Enron Center Garage has opened.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new building and are currently parking in an Enron Contract garage or on the parking waitlist you are being offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made as spaces become available.

The  Sky Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street level entrance to Enron Center North until  Sky Ring access is available. Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be used as an exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and receive a parking transponder along with a an information packet for the new garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.


February 23, 2001

     Teco Tap  30.000

February 24, 2001

     Teco Tap  17.500

February 25, 2001

     Teco Tap  38.750


Teco Tap       120.000 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron


Tyrell,  Attached are amendments for the letter agreements.  Please distribute to the appropriate individuals.  I have also included the Petro-Canada form.

Barry,  Who in Calgary should work the Petro document?

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.


I've tested in Portcalc the two gas deals (AAA172/AAA173) from the attachment below and the results were good... I made changes to the deal date (changed from 01/23/2002 to 01/04/2002) due to curves not existing on 01/23/2002... O'Neal 3-9686

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kenne, Dawn C.
Sent:	Wednesday, January  23, 2002 4:53 PM
To:	Severson, Russ; Brackett, Debbie R.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Spears, Christopher; Price, Wade R.; Hayden, Frank; Dahlke, Andrea; Saleem, Aftab; Swaim, Michael; Cheung, Cecilia; Lim, Christine; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Hunter, Larry Joe; Stevens, Mechelle; Smith, Regan M.; Theriot, Kim S.; Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Denny, Jennifer; Engel, Tom; Sweitzer, Tara; Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba
Subject:	RE: EOL test trades

Melba and I tested 4 more deals today..2 power and 2 gas.  I am attaching the transaction summary for your review.  Again, we are using the Dynegy counterparty name for testing purposes  Please verify that everything is flowing correctly to the downstream systems.

O'Neal, I will be getting with you tomorrow or Friday about how these look in Tagg and Sitara.  Also, the 11 deals that I tested yesterday, I will need you to check them out as well.  Thanks for your help.

Dawn
3-9353

 << File: trans summary 012302.xls >>


--

>>>> subscribe alumnijobs
Your request to Majordomo@haas.berkeley.edu:

 subscribe alumnijobs "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>

has been forwarded to the owner of the "alumnijobs" list for approval.
This could be for any of several reasons:

    You might have asked to subscribe to a "closed" list, where all new
 additions must be approved by the list owner.

    You might have asked to subscribe or unsubscribe an address other than
 the one that appears in the headers of your mail message.

When the list owner approves your request, you will be notified.

If you have any questions about the policy of the list owner, please
contact "alumnijobs-approval@haas.berkeley.edu".

Thanks!

Majordomo@haas.berkeley.edu
>>>>
>>>>


Carol,

I have forwarded our tax comments on the Master Steel Agreement.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

MRC

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Musch, Susan
Sent: Thursday, May  31, 2001 8:45 PM
To: Clark, Morris
Cc: Gockerman, Matthew F.
Subject: RE: Steel Master Form

Morris,

My comments on the Master Steel Agreement are as follows:

1.   Section 3.7 - The Taxes arising at the Delivery Point should be the
responsibility of the Buyer rather than Seller (i.e., Seller should be
responsible for all Taxes applicable to the Commodity being sold under the
Master Agreement arising upstream of the Delivery Point and Buyer should be
responsible for all Taxes applicable to the Commodity being sold under the
Master Agreement arising at and downstream of the Delivery Point).

2.   Section 3.7 - The phrase "within [___] days" should be added immediately
before the comma in the sentence beginning "[i]f Buyer and Seller are unable
to reach mutual agreement...."

3.   Section 3.7 - The following sentence should be inserted before the
sentence beginning "If either party is exempt from Taxes...":

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Party is not liable for any applicable Taxes
that are legally imposed on the other Party and that are refundable to the
other Party, including without limitation value added or goods and services
taxes.

4.   Section 9 - The following sentence should be added to the definition of
Delivery Point:

For purposes of  transactions involving an Option on the Commodity, the
Delivery Point shall be defined to mean the date of delivery to the Buyer of
written confirmation of the purchase and sale of the Option, which date shall
be in all cases not earlier than one day following the day of acceptance of
the Counterparty,s offer.

5.   Section 9 - The phrase "goods and services taxes," should be added to
the definition of New Taxes immediately after the phrase "value added taxes,".

6.   Section 9 - The words "value added, goods and services," should be added
to the definition of Taxes immediately after the word "use,".

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Best regards,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Clark, Morris
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Musch, Susan
Subject: FW: Steel Master Form

Susan,

Can you please take a look at the attached steel master agreement  and
provide any additional language that you think is necessary (I imagine it
should work similar to the paper and pulp master that we discussed).  My
concern with the steel master is twofold: (i) it will be used for
international counterparties; and (ii) the treatment of options in many
foreign jurisdictions.  Thanks for your help.

MRC

 -----Original Message-----
From:  St Clair, Carol
Sent: Friday, May  25, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Clark, Morris
Cc: Murray, Julia
Subject: Steel Master Form

Morris:
Could you please review and sign off on the tax language?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 03:07 PM -----

	Carol St Clair 05/25/2001 02:52 PM 	   To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Steel Master Form

Julia and harry,
Enclosed is a revised draft of the Steel Master Agreement for your review.
Could you please forward this to Cheryl?  Thanks.

 << File: STEEL WORKING DRAFT NO.4 5-25 RED.DOC >>  << File: Steel Working
Draft No.4 5-25.doc >>

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


pls print asap.  thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/09/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/08/2000 11:08 AM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, fkelly@gbmdc.com,
sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Gallup compliance filing

Here is a draft of the compliance filing regarding our operational control
agreement with ECS.  Please let me know your comments by C.O.B. tomorrow.  At
this point I'm not planning to file the agreement, just a report as requested
by the Commission.

I'm still working with ECS to finalize the agreement.  Their attorney is
checking with his resident experts to make sure ECS, by expressly giving TW
Operational Control, does not somehow cross the line into retail wheeling.  I
do not expect the agreement to change significantly.


Bible Study this Wednesday, November 29th will be held in room 30C1 from
12:00 to 1:00 today.  Carol Word will be giving the lesson.

Hope to see you there
Mary Kay


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/11/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,781
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,357
Total Life to Date Transactions	515,690

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/11/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,932	77%
Enron Europe Limited	171	35%
Global Products	195	36%
Enron Metals	483	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,754,492,066
MTD	30,628,446,748
LTD	309,798,863,793
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,411,749,354

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,508,644,681

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	603
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,107
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,328
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,963


I am sending an e-mail about the power plant. I as told by an employee of
the plant they would let us know why the plant made so much noise and  so
much vibration. I have heard nothing but noise  and felt vibration. my wife
is scared because of the add in the news paper about how the plant could
explode if the person in charge of it made a mistake . I was not informed of
this plant being built. The newspaper said that the plant was being built in
a nonresadintal area there are 8 homes in this area alone. We should not
have to put up with the noise and vibrateing. Me and my family moved in the
country to avoid all the noise . Now that is all we here we can not enjoy
the outside like we use to and i am tired of it no one tell anything.
someone needs to tell us something .I thank you for your time.
                                        Thanks
                                          Carl Stout

            ps my e-mail is spider1735@hotmail.com hope to hear from you.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Greetings from Amazon.com.

We thought you'd like to know that we shipped your items today,
and that this completes your order.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com, and we hope to see you again soon.

You can track the status of this order, and all your orders, online by
visiting "Your Account" page at http://www.amazon.com/your-account.
There you can:
        * Track order and shipment status
        * Review estimated delivery dates
        * Cancel unshipped items
        * Return items
        * And do much more

The following items were included in this shipment:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Shipped  Subtotal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1        Betty Crocker's New Cookbook   $25.00  1       $25.00
1        Better Homes and Gardens New C $21.56  1       $21.56

---------------------------------------------------------------------
               Item Subtotal:  $46.56
         Shipping & Handling:  $5.47
                       Total:  $52.03
--------------------------------------------------------------------

This shipment was sent to:

	Scott E. Hendrickson
	3719 Graustark St.
	Houston Texas 77006

via UPS Ground (3-7 business days).

For your reference, the number you can use to track your package is
1Z411E0W0326044832.  You can refer to our Web site's Help page or:

http://www.amazon.com/tracking

to retrieve current tracking information.  Please note that tracking
information may not be available immediately.

If you've explored the links on "Your Account" page but still need to get in
touch with us about your order, e-mail us at orders@amazon.com.

On your next visit to our Web site, come see what's New for You by
clicking the link on the right-hand side of our home page, or by
visiting this URL:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/recs/new-for-you/new-for-you.html/ref=cs_ae_nfy

We've selected an assortment of new releases, recommendations, and
informative articles that we think would appeal to you.

Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
orders@amazon.com             http://www.amazon.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Virendra,

Several books were set up in Risktrac will incorrect names.  Is it possible
to simply change the names of the books already set up or do we need to have
new books set up?

Thanks,
Robin


When you get a chance, would you path out deal 211642 please?  For Feb and
Mar?


Brent, also who has the risk of Y2K under our contracts?  If energy is not
delivered because of a Y2K problem, is that a force majeure event or
otherwise excused?  Your are right to raise this issue.  Let me know what
response you are getting.  Take care.  Mark


Hi Vince,

Have a look at my homepage which I have been updating (see Energy Markets):
www.acmc.uq.edu.au/~gwd/EnergyExchange.html

Regards Glen Dixon
Part - Time Phd Student - Department of Mathematics (University of
Queensland)

P.S I am hopefully attending the Australian Risk Conference where you are a
speaker in July 2000 (Sydney). Hope to hear you speak.

 Glen W. Dixon
  Project Officer - Procurement Profiling
  Queensland Purchasing
  Department of Public Works

  "Important

  This electronic message and any attachments are supplied in
good faith and are believed to be free of Year 2000 or other date related
problems (i.e. Year 2000 compliance).  The Department of Public Works
forwards this message and attachments to you on the basis that you use them
at your own risk.  The department accepts no responsibility for damage or
loss (arising from negligence or otherwise) which may occur through the use
or transmission of this message and attachments and recommends that you
conduct your own independent tests to determine Year 2000 compliance before
use.

  The contents of this electronic message and any attachments
are intended only for the addressee and may contain privileged or
confidential information.  They may only be used for the purposes for which
they were supplied.  If you are not the addressee, you are notified that any
transmission, distribution, downloading, printing or photocopying of the
contents of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited.  The
privilege or confidentiality attached to this message and attachments is not
waived, lost or destroyed by reason of a mistaken delivery to you.  If you
receive this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail or
telephone.

  Thank you."


Attached is a follow-up data request for FERC's Bulk Power  Investigation.
Please direct your response, as soon as possible, in care of  Brian
Harrington via e-mail, if possible at the following address.

E-mail: Brian.Harrington@FERC.FED.US

FAX: 202-208-0193

Mail:?? Federal Energy Regulatory  Commission
????????? C/O Brian  Harrington
????????? 888 First  St. N.E.
??????????Washington,  D.C. 20426

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact  Brian Harrington
(202/208-2493) or me. Thank you for your prompt response.

?

Michelle Veloso
Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates
Energy Markets Division
202/208-2008


> DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION
>
> Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order!  Please read and retain this
> e-mail for your records.  It contains important information relating to
> your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell.
>
> Your Dell customer number is:  12831599
>
> Your order number is:  506990233/506990241
>
> Your total "Out of Pocket" amount:  $1156.97
> The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and
> taxes.
>
>
> Your Online Sales Point of Contact:
> We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are
> Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time.  You can reach our office
> by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at:
> US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com <mailto:US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com> .
>
> Estimated Ship Date:
> We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 01/31/01.
> Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee
> the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in
> manufacturing.  Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and
> conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com <http://www.dell.com>.
>
> Total Satisfaction Policy:
> If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll
> refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked.  You
> are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us.
> EPP Customer Care contact options: 1-866-220-3355,  option 4 or use the
> e-mail box  US Relationship EPP@dell.com .
>
> How to Check Order Status:
> If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's
> automated order status inquiry system at:  1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's
> Order Status Page at: <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp>.
>
>
> You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped,
> by going to:
> <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum>.
>
> How to reach a Technical Support Representative:
> Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell
> technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3.
> You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number".  The "Service Tag
> Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code
> label on the back of the system.  Please have this number ready before you
> contact the technical support representative.
>
>
> Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program.  It is
> my pleasure to work with you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Jerome Alder
> Dell Sales Rep.
> EPP
> 1-800-695-8133
> Ext. 49761
> Email:Jerome_Alder@Dell.com
>
>


MARK YOUR LUNCH CALENDARS NOW !

You are invited to attend the EWS Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring:  TIM BATTAGLIA

Topic:  Steel Origination

Thursday, April 19, 2001
11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
EB 5 C2


Please make sure my Cont. onepass account is credited and my Marriott rewards
account.

	SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>
	03/23/2001 05:15 PM

		 To: RICHARD.B.SANDERS@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject: TICKETED  27MAR HOUSTON TO LAX  -------- TICKETED AND UPGRADED

                                          AGENT SS/SS BOOKING REF ZYR7VF

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN TWANDA SWEET X39402

  DATE:  MAR 23 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27MAR HOUSTON TX     LOS ANGELES CA 230P    406P
CO 1509    Y          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      *********SEAT 2B CONFIRMED********

HOTEL                 27MAR LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN MARRIOTT
                      28MAR 333 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
                            LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
                            TELEPHONE: (213) 617-1133
                            CONFIRMATION: 81101053
                            REFERENCE: REGB00
                            RATE: RAC USD 259.00 PER NIGHT
                            ADDITIONAL CHARGES MAY APPLY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  28MAR LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     350P    905P
CO 1506    Y          WED   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      ********SEAT 3E CONFIRMED*********

      AIR FARE 1637.20      TAX 131.30          TOTAL USD        1768.50
                                            AIR TOTAL USD        1768.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD        1768.50

PAYMENT: CCAX378501018762006/0301/A000020

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/I07B51

SANDERS/RICHARD B                        TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7026273460

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COTP028685
**********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Tom,

The Thamm #1 well came on line for first delivery on Tuesday, 2/1/00 at
6:45pm.  The contract calls for first of the month pricing.  Please create a
one month baseload firm deal ticket in sitara based upon the following:

Counterparty    Meter    Volume   Price

Union Gas Corporation   9823    500mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC less $0.10

Susan will create a firm ticket for the term of the deal once our geologists
have gathered enough data to forecast the reserves for this well; at such
time, we will request that this ticket be zeroed out.

If there are any questions or concerns please give me a call.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


Group,

From now on do not sell the generator's schedules real time for all day or
for a good portion of the day  like we used to because the ISO has been
cutting our exports at NOB in conjunction with our gen schedules.

Per Chris Foster, if we decide to sell any of the gen schedules real time we
only do it for a couple of hours at a time. That way when we see that the ISO
cuts the exports we can immediately cut the gen schedule.  This is the way I
was told to proceed in these cases in the future.

If you have any questions ask Chris or Bill

thanks,
Monika


The Methanol Plant is up and making spec product.  Rates will be increased to
full rates on Thursday, March 30, if oxygen is available.


Here are the facts to be converted into Talking Points / Facts Sheet for CA
TEAM.

Thanks,

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 02:14 PM -----

	Mary Schoen
	02/22/2001 02:55 PM

		 To: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA Supply Realities

Attached is a memo comparing the CEC's forecasted supply and a more realistic
look at what additional resources might be available this summer.

The bottom line is that:

1.  The CEC significantly underestimates the outages that may occur this
summer.  They estimate in their 5,000 MW supply deficit for the summer that
expected outages will be around 3,000MW.  However, November and December saw
significantly higher outage levels.  (7,265 MWs) The FERC has investigated
these outages and found no improprieties- just that the plants are overtaxed
from running at higher than normal capacities.

2.  There are a lot of uncertainties surrounding the 1,244 MWs of projected
supply from rerating/restarting existing thermal and renewable projects.  It
is very unclear how much of this will be able to come on line by this summer,
if at all.  As evidenced by the e-mail I sent out this morning, local
communities may be very opposed to restarting shut down units.  In addition,
these units are likely to be uneconomical.

3.  In the existing resource pool, there are roughly 1,430 MWs of peaking or
other generation units that are running up against their operating hour
limitations from air quality regulations.  The Governor has ordered the local
air quality districts to address these restrictions,  We are beginning to
seem some movement; however, the US EPA has yet to weigh in on these relaxed
standards.

4.  The distributed generation/back-up generation capacity to make up some of
the shortfall is still an unknown.  While there has been some relaxing of the
limitations on run hours for back-up generation at "essential public
services" the increase in DG is expected from "clean" sources, not diesel
emergency generators.

5.  The CEC is doing everything it can to get 50+ MW peaking units on-line by
this summer.  They are promising a 21-day permit application approval process
and are offering to pay half of the cost of offsets, for "clean" sources of
generation in critical areas.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

CEC's Summer Forecasted Peak Demand - Resource Balance:

List of Peakers running into their operating hour limitations:

Also available in hard copy format only:
(please e-mail me your fax number if you'd like a copy)

Table 1:  Fully Executed CA ISO Summer Reliability Agreements (the ISO
Peaking Facilities)
Table 2:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Renewables Construction Status Summary
Table 3:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Rerate of Non-CEC Projects
Table 4:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - CEC Rerate Status Summary
Table 5:  Idle Biomass Plants Potentially Capable of Restart
Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Greg_Hathaway@dom.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Mckay, Brad
Cc:	b.mckay%enron@dom.com
Subject:	brad.karp@edftrading.com

Greg Hathaway

Office Phone: 804.273.4421

Virginia Power Energy Marketing
5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Fax: 804.273.2927

greg_hathaway@dom.com


I will send Ina the final plan this AM.

----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:32 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Cc:	Rangel, Ina; Forster, David
Subject:	RE: almost final
Importance:	High

Scott please provide Ina and the assistants with the info they need to start the churns.  They must be submitted by NOON today.  I have to meet with the move team to work the timing issues.

The trading simulation is already at risk as all commercial people may not be relocated by Thurs.

Thanks,
Tammy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neal, Scott
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:28 AM
To:	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Subject:	RE: almost final

Tammy,

I will have final for you by 10:30am.  Bob is working on his supoort people right now and we will be meeting to allocate/place
assistants at 10:00am.  I will send shortly thereafter.

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:17 PM
To:	Neal, Scott
Cc:	Rangel, Ina
Subject:	almost final
Importance:	High

Scott,
Attached is the file with Lavo's changes.  Note he's added a couple of interest rate desks and put gas weather and another fundies person in - Bob Superty was looking for 3 logistics support people that should be on the floor,  Tammy Jaquet, Richard Pinion, and Natalie Baker.  Please assign them and the assistants a desk.

We are out of time on turning this churn in.  I must have it by noon.  I will be meeting with the move team tomorrow afternoon to set move dates.  I'm being asked about  the trading simulation for next week and since your churns aren't set I can't provide an answer.

Ina, please pull in whomever you need to work on the churn,  be sure and get with Superty's asst to help you with those people etc.

Regards,
Tammy

 << File: 6th floorplan 01 30.xls >>


Mr. Fournier:

This is Janette Elbertson, Mark Haedicke's Assistant.  I spoke with your
assistant this morning and this meeting has been rescheduled for Thursday,
March 1, at 11:30 am in Jim Derrick's office.  Lunch is scheduled after the
meeting if that meets your schedule.

Mark Haedicke is traveling this week.  I will call your e-mail to his
attention upon his return on Friday.

	"DAN FOURNIER" <dan.fournier@blakes.com>
	02/09/2001 09:42 AM

		 To: <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Dear Mark:

I trust you had a pleasant holiday season.  I understand that our meeting
with Jim Derrick and you has been rescheduled to the first part of March.
Your assistant gave us the choice of March 1 or 2.  Although we can
accommodate both dates, March 1 works better for David Jackson.

Our understanding is that Blakes is not getting any further work from Enron
as a result of the circumstances under which we could no longer continue
acting for Enron in litigation involving Westcoast, another Blakes client.

As you can well imagine, the prospect of losing our valued relationship with
Enron is extremely disappointing, especially considering the significant
inroads we had made during the last couple of years in getting to know Enron,
its various businesses and representing your interests on a number of major
transactions and initiatives in Canada.

At this point in time, we need to better understand where we stand and
whether there is any prospect of representing your interests in Canada.  One
of our concerns in trying to mend fences is our relationship with your
Calgary office which we perceive to be paramount in any effort to
re-establish the kind of relationship we had with Enron prior to this
incident.  As a result, we would like to seek your views on this prior to our
meeting in Houston so as not to further aggravate our relationship with the
Calgary office.

David Jackson and Jim Christie, two key members of our senior executive, and
I would be available to discuss this matter with you at your convenience
Wednesday, Thursday or Friday of next week.  Perhaps you can let me know what
works best for you and we could initiate the call.

Thanking you in advance for your kind consideration.

Best regards,

Dan


Congratulations to 2 new weekly winners and our first repeat:  JAM took 1st
for the week and Prentice was 3rd.  Nancy had her second weekly win, placing
2nd.

Barrie maintains her rookie of the year honors even though she had a very
bad week, and Donna who ended in last place last year is now in 6th place.

Big ranking swaps - JAM went from 14th to a tie for 3rd and Prentice went
from 11th to a tie for 3rd.  The bottom 5 remained unchanged -

Week 3 results are on the Week #3 tab.  Cumulative payouts are on the Payout
tab.  Cumulative points are on the Total tab.

My regular e-mail is working fine:  eldon@interx.net.  If you send your
picks by e-mail, please use this address.

 - Scores99.xls


Good luck.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Furrow, Dale; Herndon, Rogers; Black, Don; Dayao, Anthony; Pagan, Ozzie; Woulfe, Greg
Subject:

I'M GOING TO SPEND THURSDAY AFTERNOON WORKING WITH DAVE - HONESTLY - NOT ON THE GOLF COURSE.  SO LET''S CANCEL THE MEETING.\

JOHN


plz see below for responses in red.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/30/2000 02:53 PM
To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged,
M/VIndustrialBridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

More questions; can either of you answer?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

"Ted Rosen" <trosen@jwortham.com> on 11/30/2000 02:27:21 PM
To: <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged,
M/VIndustrialBridge.

Jim,

Sharron seems content with what you have provided regarding Enron's
responsibility to insure, etc.   Thank you.  She is now asking the following:

1.  What is Enron claiming for?
response - siemens westinghouse is/will be claiming for full and total loss
of the generator.  a replacement generator is currently being manufactured in
austria and will arrive in port of houston, tx in the mid april 01
timeframe.  we have a meeting sched with them next week.  we'll attempt to
determine what the "value" of just the generator is from siemens-westinghouse
(i.e., we have a price for the gas turbine generator unit, but not separate
prices for just the gas turbine and the generator).

2.  What is the financial extent of Enron's claim?
response - plz refer to above comment.

It seems to me that the short answers to these questions would be:

1. The cost to repair the generator that Enron was supposed to receive from
SWPC.
response - again, we are talking about a total loss and not just a repair.
plz see above.

2.  Unknown until SWPC actually tears down the generator and determines the
extent of damage and the cost to repair.
response - again, the generator will not be repaired.  therefore, this
question is n/a.

Those answers, however, will certainly provoke further questions such as:

1)  When and where is SWPC going to tear down the unit,  inspect it, and
determine the repair costs?
response - plz see prior email.  also, the generator will not be repaired.
therefore, this question is n/a.

2)  Isn't the water damage just getting worse as the generator just sits
there unopened, with no measures taken to prevent further deterioration?
response - plz understand that siemens westinghouse still has care, custody
and control of the damaged generator.  at this time, siemens westinghouse
considers the generator a total loss.  normally, this would have been a great
question.  however, given the circumstances, this question is n/a.

Jim, if anyone can provide a response to Sharron's questions, please let me
know what you find out.

Thanks,

Thanks,

Ted Rosen

>>> <James.P.Studdert@enron.com> 11/30/00 01:18PM >>>
Will this do?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 01:09 PM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben
      Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
      Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, trosen@jwortham.com
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.  (Document link: James P Studdert)

thanx for note.

ref: section 19.2.1, cargo insurance of the "purchase contract between
enron equipment procurement company and siemens westinghouse power
corporation (a siemens company) for one (1) w501d5a gas turbine generator
package," y2k(6)-2-98 contract, r3 (ct) 03/17/99, provides that:

"Purchaser shall provide or cause to be provided and maintained for the
period of transportation, in sufficient time so as not to delay Seller's
transportation of the Equipment, Cargo Insurance for Equipment.  Such
insurance will be provided as Marine Cargo Insurance on a warehouse to
warehouse basis insuring Equipment against loss or damage arising from
customary "all-risk" marine perils (including war, strikes, riots and civil
commotion) while in transit.  The deductible (the responsibility of Seller)
shall be Twenty Five Thousand US Dollars ($25,000) for each and every
physical damage loss.  Purchaser shall provide, or cause to be provided,
Seller the opportunity to review and comment on the draft Cargo insurance
policy prior to its placement.  Such review shall occur as soon as
available.  Seller's review shall be limited to 15 days from Purchaser's
submission of draft Cargo Policy.  Purchaser shall incorporate or cause to
be incorporated Seller's suggested changes to the Cargo Policy provided
such provisions are common, customary, and are reasonable commercially
available.  Such policy shall specify Seller as an additional insured and
waive any rights of subrogation against Seller under such policy."

where Purchaser is enron.
where Seller is siemens-westinghouse.
where Equipment "shall mean the CT-Unit and all other material and supplies
to be furnished by Seller pursuant to the Scope of Work."
where CT-Unit "shall mean a nominal 501d5a gas turbine generator econopac
with generator package with all its ancillary and auxiliary equipment."

hope this helps.  we can fax a cc of this section as needed.  plz advise,
including names and fax numbers.  also, plz advise if addl info needed.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/30/2000 12:46 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

Please see the comments from Ted Rosen below and advise if this can be
answered.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

James P Studdert
11/30/2000 09:23 AM

To:   David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.

David, can you come up with the requested documentation, and if there is
none, can you write an explanatory memo as to how this came down?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

"Ted Rosen" <trosen@jwortham.com> on 11/30/2000 09:19:51 AM

To:   <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.

Jim:

Thanks for the reply. Sharron has focused on the comment that the unit has
not actually been "delivered" to  Enron and that title, ownership, and
custody are still with SWPC.   She is therefore questioning Enron's
insurable interest.

I have commented to her that Enron can insure goods titled to another party
as long as Enron has instructions to insure the goods.  Sharron does not
dispute this, but has asked if there is any documentary evidence that would
show that Enron had instructions to insure this cargo. I think we can
interpret "instructions" liberally.  If there is a purchase order or
similar agreement that states that Enron is to insure the turbine, that
should be sufficient.  Would you please ask for this?

Thanks and regards,

Ted Rosen

>>> <James.P.Studdert@enron.com> 11/29/00 11:08AM >>>
Here's the response, finally.
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 10:24 AM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      Industrial Bridge.

plz see addl comments below in blue; i.e., reflects conversation with mr.
matt tezyk.
regards.  scott.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/29/2000 10:13 AM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw
11/29/2000 08:38 AM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Re: Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.
      (Document link: Scott Laidlaw)

regrets.  i thought that this had been previously responded to.  see below
for comments in red.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/28/2000 08:51 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

No one has bothered to respond!  The questions below need to be answered BY
SOMEONE!  Underwriters are growing impatient, and if no response is
forthcoming, they will assume we have withdrawn the claim and close their
file.  Can SOMEONE please respond?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
08:45 PM ---------------------------

James P Studdert
11/15/2000 12:17 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.

Gentlemen, if I've left out who this should be directed to, please forward
to whomever can provide the answers.

Is Enron Equipment Procurement Co. still pursuing a claim against Enron
cargo insurers?
comment - we probably need to discuss this with ena's ben jacoby so that
you can receive specific guidance.  as i understand it, since enron's
insurance (e.g., marine cargo) is primary, enron will pursue a claim
against the enron cargo insurer.
further comment - the answer remains "yes."  again, must discuss with ena's
ben jacoby because of his commercial involvement/expectations.

If so, I must provide proof of ownership of the damaged generator (other
than an e-mail message).  Please provide ASAP.
comment - what do you need?  while enron has made approx. 95% of the
payments for the gas turbine generator unit, it is likely that ownership
still resides with westinghouse - i.e., it was never delivered per the
equipment purchase contract with enron.  again, what type of documentation
do you need?  does it matter if westinghouse is still in the loop?
further comment - at this time, title, ownership, care, custody and control
remain with westinghouse.  further, westinghouse must continue to be in the
loop because the monies for the damaged might ultimately be paid to them -
i.e., westinghouse provides enron with a new replacement generator; then,
westinghouse receives the insurance money to cover their loss/damaged
generator.

Is the generator to be repaired?
comment - no, the generator is not to be repaired.  instead, a replacement
generator is being manufactured in austria for westinghouse and is to be
delivered to the port of houston in the mid-april01 timeframe.

If so, when and where.
comment - n/a.

Underwriters surveyor needs to examine it when it is taken apart.
comment - n/a.

The surveyor was told when he made an inspection at the Port that a
detailed repair estimate would be provided to him on the other unit that
was damaged, and this would provide a guide as to the type of damage on our
unit.
comment - only the generator was damaged.  the gas turbine is complete and
resides in houston.  i do not understand your comment about damage to
another unit
further comment - the "other unit" does not belong to enron - i.e., it
belongs to another westinghouse client.  plz understand that the "other
unit" was immersed deeper in salt water than our unit.  as a result, its
damage was greater.  in that we are getting a replacement generator, we
have to assume that the "other unit" that was also damaged is also being
replaced.  therefore, it can be inferred that the damage estimate for both
generators are approximately the same.

To date, nothing has been sent to our surveyor.
comment - none.
further comment - we are not sure about your statement.  our understanding
is that you previously both communicated with and sent the accident survey
of westinghouse's underwriter to our surveyor.

As it has been over three months since the unit arrived in Houston in its
damaged condition, if Enron expects to collect from Enron cargo insurers,
we must move forward in providing the information previously requested, or
prejudice Enron's claim to recovery due to lack of cooperation with the
adjuster/surveyor.
comment - noted.


Hey Stephanie, I can see that you are super super swamped, so I am trying to
help by doing some of the paralegal work to get several of the URGENT
brokerage agreements done.  I do need your help on the following:

1. As I mentioned earlier today, the last few tasks I left for you for Enron
Credit Inc. are critical.  I jsut need for you to call that contact to find
out when they will have the tax I.D. number and let her know that we
corrected the final slate of officers via Richard Sage and not by the info in
the system and we want the info in the system updated right away.  We were
able to get certain key documents to Bear in order to open the account but
that stunt was contigent on our getting to them the outstanding information
immediately thereafter and they are calling us on it.  Sara represented to me
that this work was extremely urgent.

Sara, maybe you can provide some guidance to Stephanie about whether she
should put extra focus on these other tasks.

2.  As per my previous emails yesterday and today, please have the documents
ready for Goldman International by the end of the day Thursday.

thanx.
Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Prices in the January 13, 2002 Real-Time Market are correct.

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 21:00 - 23:00 in the January 13,
2002 Hour-Ahead locational reserve market.

Prices in the January 14, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

Please note that Market Monitoring will no longer be reserving prices due
to ECA-B.  Code modifications were made on December 20th to incorporate
into the Real-Time price, the BME price in the presence of congestion.  The
incorporation is now an automatic process that is prescribed by the NYISO
tariffs.  This message will appear in price reservation announcements
through January 31, 2002.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: RRING@EES.ENRON.COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628547Y@lyris.nyiso.com


Sorry, as I had signed a resignation letter I assumed that the changes had
already happened.
Sue is faxing to Jeff Hodge today to execute.

the Directors are: Derrick, Haedicke, Frevert
the officers will be: President Frevert
   Secretary Jeff Kinneman
   Treasurer Craig Chaney

From: Sara Shackleton on 22/03/2001 08:41 CST
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Here's a recap for everyone.
Our original negotiation with Bear (for the Securities Loan Agreement) was in
the name of ENA, and, ENA had an existing account agreement with Bear.
However, Bear insisted that the account agreement was "too old" and that we
negotiate a new agreement.  I agreed on the condition that this not hold up
execution of the Securities Loan Agreement.  We have one or two final points
remaining on the new account agreement which we'll execute for both ENA and
Enron Credit Inc.. ("ECI").  We have the authorized trader list for ECI and
are waiting for Richard to designate the new officer/director slate but we
are prepared for execution by the existing officers in London.  The
assignment instrument will be very short for transferring the ECI book from
ENA to ECI.  It will take only a few days to replace the existing ENE
guaranty for the Securities Loan Agreement.

Jeff and Sheila:  Please verify that both ENA and ECI do not  need the
Securities Loan Agreement.  I believe it is just ECI and we can transfer the
existing agreement to ECI.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	03/21/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: BEAR Guarantee letter

Sara,

I just spoke with Russ Miron from Bear Sterans regarding our Guaranty to
Reduce funding to 20% per side.

I had asked him about when they will be executing the agreement.  He said
that his lawyers are ready to sign but are under the impression that you have
one remaining point to resolve and that this point is holding up the
finalization of the agreement.

Is there an issue from our side?  If not we should be able to get this
execution taken care of immediately?

Thanks,

Tom
713-853-9074


Monika,

Could you send me the Chilean capacity spreadsheet you'd put together?  Thanks.

Karen


Bob,
I'll take Oakland as my winner this week.

I gave Lucci my $20.

Theresa Staab


Marshall,

A number of my associates. The names are to be determined.

Vince

Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/12/2001 12:48:21 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Resume

Vince,
     Who else besides you will be speaking with him?

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters Associates
Tel: (212) 704-0596
Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
http://www.robertwalters.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 1:35 PM
> To: Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> Cc: Zimin.Lu@enron.com; Paulo.Issler@enron.com;
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> Subject: RE: Resume
>
>
> Marshall,
>
> We shall call him on Wednesday after 2:30.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/12/2001 11:23:31
> AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Resume
>
>
> Vince,
>      He can talk today after 2:30pm today or Wednesday afternoon as well.
> His work # is 713-544-5989.  Let me know.
> Regards,
>
> Marshall Brown
> Vice President
> Robert Walters Associates
> Tel: (212) 704-0596
> Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
> mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> http://www.robertwalters.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Monday, March 12, 2001 11:40 AM
> > To:     Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> > Subject:     Re: Resume
> >
> >
> > Marshall,
> >
> > Looks interesting. Can we arrange an exploratory phone interview?
> >
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/09/2001 07:46:22
> > AM
> >
> > To:   Vince Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Resume
> >
> >
> > Vince,
> >      How are you.   This candidate would be interested in any positions
> in
> > your group.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Marshall Brown
> > Vice President
> > Robert Walters Associates
> > Tel: (212) 704-0596
> > Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
> > mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> > http://www.robertwalters.com
> >
> >  <<ZHAN_REN.DOC>>
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and
> could
> > be intercepted by a third party.
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> >
> > (See attached file: ZHAN_REN.DOC)
> >
> >  << File: ZHAN_REN.DOC >>
>
>
>


paperloop.com
BRUSSELS, July 18, 2001 (paperloop.com) - Frantschach Pulp and Paper has ordered an automatic chip storage and reclaiming system for its two pulp lines at the Steti plant in the Czech Republic. The revamp will be implemented in two stages to avoid a shutdown. The first phase of the upgrade will be completed in February 2002 and the final work will be wrapped up in July 2002.
 A spokesman said the Steti mill produces 250,000 tonnes/yr of bleached and unbleached kraft pulp. The new system will enhance safety and product quality.
Steti's paper mill produces 200,000 tonnes/yr of sack paper, machine-glazed (MG) wrapping paper and linerboard. A revamp of the plant's PM is also planned for next year. The unit's 12,000 tonnes/yr capacity of MG paper is set to gradually rise to 31,000 tonnes/yr following the upgrade.


A vote was taken, and NY,NY was declared the winner.  I then went around to
everyone and the were cool with NYNY because it was putting an extra $100 in
everyone's pocket.  If you want to talk to everyone and try and convince
them, let me know.  By the way, how do I get my high score weekly money?  DO
I have to wait until the end of the season.
PL


Let me know if this is what you wanted.


Are Bill Collectors Hounding YOU? Are Your Credit Card Bills TOO MUCH? WE CAN HELP! Our Non-Profit Credit Card Consolidators can help you reduce your credit card bills and unsecured debt, FREE OF Charge!

http://www.eloangroup.com

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1hcl.803w8


I talked to our CPUC attorney, Jeanne Bennett.

There is a CPUC tomorrow at which a vote could be taken
It is not on the agenda now, but that doesn't stop a vote
The CPUC could decide by majority vote to take up the issue at the meeting
and then vote to enact the ban on direct access -- all without any notice to
the public
We will have a representative at the meeting.
Jeff is contacting coalition members to work the legislative angle.
There is another CPUC meeting on 2/22

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


15 USC 3361 allows the President to declare a natural gas supply emergency if
there is a severe shortage or one is imminent in the US or any region
thereof.  I have not examined this section in detail, and I think it may
address allocation more than anything, but it may be something we want to
look at.  I don't think it was repealed in 89 ir 92.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Rimmer, Todd
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Raab, Eric
Cc:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: USTeleNet Transaction

If we purchased the switch from an outside party and then leased it to USTeleNet under a capital lease, the asset would still be booked on UST's books at its FMV.  There would be no associated gain as the asset was never theirs (the third party would get the gain on sale).  Bullets 3 and 4 would be basically the same, except for the cash going to a third party.

Todd Rimmer
Director - EWS Transaction Support
Phone - 713-345-2803
Fax - 713-646-3347
Cell - 713-560-6493

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Raab, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Rimmer, Todd
Cc:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: USTeleNet Transaction

What if we purchase the switch from a 3rd party, i.e. CES?  How would that affect your 1st 2 bullets?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rimmer, Todd
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Mann, Kay; Raab, Eric
Subject:	USTeleNet Transaction

Just to follow-up on our discussion yesterday regarding the accounting treatment assuming that USTeleNet owns the switch and that we purchase the switch and lease it back to them under a "capital" lease, the following would occur:

The asset would stay on their books (however it would be "marked-up" to FMV as evidenced by the purchase price)
They would defer the gain, if any, over the asset's life.
They would record a payable on their balance sheet and recognize interest expense in their P&L as payments are made
We would record the payment of cash to them and book a receivable and deferred interest income (to be recognized over the lease term)

Essentially we are lending them money equal to the FMV of their asset and receiving interest payments in return (i.e. direct financing lease)

I would be happy to go into more detail at your request.  Please let me know as issues develop and I will assist as necessary.

Regards,

Todd Rimmer
Director - EWS Transaction Support
Phone - 713-345-2803
Fax - 713-646-3347
Cell - 713-560-6493


FYI.  Any thoughts Joe & Co.? Is release from contracts an "increase supply"
option?  My fear is that QFs get released and then California's "police
state" mentality kicks in, enacting Exec Orders, legislation, etc. to ensure
that the power from the QF facilities stays in California.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

We are trying to set up energy purchasing arrangements with QFs who get
temporarily released from their contracts.  Take a look at the e-mail below
and see if we can suport them.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
05:26 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Short, Bill" <BSHORT@ridgewoodpower.com>
03/19/2001 03:59 PM

To: "Michael Davis (E-mail)" <mdavis02@coral-energy.com>, "Frank Eckhart
(E-mail)" <ffec@dynegy.com>, "Steve B. Van Leer (E-mail)"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "Doug Fernley (E-mail)"
<doug.fernley@elpaso.com>, "Chris H. Foster (E-mail)"
<chris.h.foster@enron.com>, "Jack Pyburn (E-mail)"  <jack.pyburn@mirant.com>,
"Mark Thompson (E-mail)"  <mark.thompson@nrgenergy.com>, "Marvin (\"Trip\")
K. Ballard (E-mail)"  <marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>, "Shawn Nichols
(E-mail)"  <shawn.nichols@williams.com>, "Kyle T. Hoffman (E-mail)"
<khoffman@caiso.com>
cc: "Bahrs, John" <jbahrs@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Gulino, Dan"
<dgulino@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Holmes, Randy"  <Rholmes@ridgewoodpower.com>,
"Kawash, David"  <dkawash@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Naunton, Chris"
<Cnaunton@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Quinn, Marty"  <Mquinn@ridgewoodpower.com>
Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

 <<Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC>>  <<RIDGEWOOD
_REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC>>

Gentlemen,

In light of the possible backouts in California today and later this week,
if it is possible, Ridgewood Power requests that your organization intervene
in support of the attached emergency filing at the FERC.  Please send this
e-mail to your firm's general counsel and ask him to contact either our
Washington counsel, Carol Smoots (202-496-7196), our general counsel, Dan
Gulino (800-331-8006, x-118) or me at (800-331-8006, x-163).  Any help would
be most appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Bill Short

 - Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC
 - RIDGEWOOD _REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC


Hello guys!

Just to keep you up to date on the Christmas Party Plans that we are working
on.  (Mark your calendars - Invitation to follow)

DATE:  December 15th, 2000

DINNER: MORTON'S OF CHICAGO  TIME: 5:15 p.m.
  400 Post St.
  San Francisco, CA

AFTER DINNER EVENT: STOMP  TIME:    8:00 p.m.
    Marines Theather
    609 Sutter St.
    San Francisco, CA

Total headcount to date is: 50

Cristina


Good morning.  Do you guys have access to these ECTRIC ISDAs below?

Thanks,
Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Latham, Jenny
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Hunter, Larry Joe; Anderson, Diane
Cc:	Shivers, Lynn
Subject:	ISDA'S for London
Importance:	High

Joe/Diane,

We urgently need to receive copies of the ISDA's for the following counterparties (with ECTRIC):

Paul Hartmann AG
Sodra Skogsagama Ek

Please let me know when you will be able to send these to me.  We are very minimally staffed over here (as I'm sure you are as well) and really need your assistance.  Thanks.  Jenny.


Hi Jason,
Hope your work is going fine.  Mom and I are fine.
I hope you have your car & drivers license stuff fixed.
I was thinking (worrying) about that the other day, and it
dawned on me that if you got stopped again, they would probably
(may) take your drivers license. That wouldn't be too good with
you just starting a new job. Let me and mom know, we still worry
about you (and will till we're gone--so don't get in an uproar).
You will understand that when you have kids--natural instinct.
Mom and I are anxious to come see you in March, probably around
3d or 4th. We don't know if you can get a day off, or if you want
to even ask with your new job etc. But think about it and let us
know so we can plan our week off. If we can't see you more than the
weekend, we will leave Monday and do something ourselves on the way
back home. It's only a month away, so let us know what you'd like
or can do as soon as you can.  Thanks.  Say hi to Beth for us.
Dad
PS: Mom bought me the "Riding with the King" CD, so don't send it.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011120.txt


Regarding Willims,  I  left a phone message for Carol Milanowski  with
Williams  regarding a Master  Agreement and their objection to our GTC.

I  have and completed revisions as suggested by Russell Diamond to credit
sections of the Williams' draft  previously sent in March of 1999.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Wes

Are we allocating people like research out to the various wholesale groups.

John


Bob's at lunch right now - I've left a big note on his desk and we'll sort it
out this afternoon. Thanks for the reminder.

Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/29/2001 11:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I hate to bug you with this.  Whenever you can spare a second would
you ask Bob about this?  I am afraid it is going to slip through the cracks.

Thanks for your help!
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hi Bob, I was wondering if you have contacted Constellation about the 6
trades that are in the system with the Cal Px as the index price.  All of
these trades start flowing in July of this year.

The deal numbers are as follows:

453152.01
453175.01
453294.01
462109.01
471888.01
471889.01

Let me know if Constellation agrees to change these deals to the Dow Jones so
I can send a letter for them to sign.

Thanks,
Melissa


Geoff Pollard is the SM for Pac Tel.

From:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/21/2001 04:01 PM
To:	Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike B Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate, Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject:	Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint

I received a call late today from the CPUC (Joyce @ 415-703-2199).  Someone from Pac Tel called and said that his service was switched without authorization - Mike Benson with Payphone group @707-253-8892 or 707-292-1766.

Lamar -- who is the client rep for Pac Tel?  Can they get into Pac Tel and try and find out if we have done something inappropriate?  We need to call this guy back by Monday EOB.  Please let Jeff Dasovich know so he can call Joyce back - I'll be out on vacation next week.

Jim


FYI

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 01:59 PM -----

	Steve Pruett@ENRON
	02/02/2001 12:57 PM

		 To: TERESA.g.bushman@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Internet Update

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron on 02/02/2001
12:23 PM ---------------------------

"TIM HEADLEY" <theadley@gardere.com> on 01/17/2001 02:53:32 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:

Subject: Internet Update

Friends,
?
In case you are interested in the latest intellectual property issues
involving the Internet, I have attached my paper which I will be giving at a
State Bar Seminar in March.? I have also included below a link to that  paper
on Gardere's web page:
?
http://www.gardere.com/newsimages/Internetupdate.pdf
?
?
?
Tim Headley
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite  3100
Houston, TX? 77002-5007
Office:?? 713 276  5320
Mobile:? 713 398 1045
Fax:??????  713 276 6320
www.gardere.com
 - 2001 Internet Update.doc
 - TIM HEADLEY.vcf


Please communicate or distribute as you see fit. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001
03:32 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 07/05/2001 02:28 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Dunn Subpoena

Fighting the kangaroo court actually got us some points with the media.  If
we can continue without getting anyone (other than Dasovich) thrown in jail,
let's fight.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:27 PM -----

	Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/05/2001 02:20 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Dunn Subpoena

The Dunn Committee will be taking up the contempt citations again on Tuesday,
July 10.  We are currently contemplating two actions.   First, we intend to
offer to produce some documents, most notably the ISO bid data sought (which
the Committee already has anyway).  Secondly, as we do not expect this
voluntary partial production to placate the Committee, we are preparing an
action to file in federal court in Sacramento on Monday challenging the
subpoena to the extent it seeks to require the production of documents other
than those we offered to produce.  Robin Gibbs and Mike Kirby are on board
with this.  Please let me know if would like any additional information about
these matters.  Thank you.


Mr. Hyvl,

I added Section 8.9 in your CPS file below incorporating "Utilization of
Small Business Concerns," a clause we are required as a municipality to
incorporate in all of our contracts.  I added it with the Word tracking
feature "in red" so you would not have to type it in yourself.  Let me know
if it causes your company any qualms.

As far as your question regarding purchase orders, all of our purchases from
Enron will reference the same purchase order so that you may use the same
number on each invoice.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 2:38 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Cc: "'Dan.J.Hyv@enron.com"@postmaster.enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Changed as requested.

(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)

                    "Pfister,

                    Christian W."         To:     "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"

                    <CWPfister@cps        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                    -satx.com>            cc:

                                          Subject:     FW: Enfolio Contract
with CPS
                    11/02/2000

                    02:10 PM

Could you change paragraph iii at the end of Representations and Warranties
to read:

"(iii) its obligations to make payments hereunder are unsubordinated
obligations and such payments are operating and maintenance costs which
enjoy first priority of payment under the ordinances of the City of San
Antonio which govern payments by Customer."

There are no indentures to which CPS is a party.  Thanks ...

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Wood [mailto:jwood@mattbran.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:15 AM
To: 'Pfister, Christian W.'; Jon Wood
Cc: Mc Whirter, Daniel D.
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Change the clause after "first priority payment" in (iii) to "under the
ordinances of the City of San Antonio which govern payments by Customer."
There are no indentures to which CPS is a party.  Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W. [mailto:CWPfister@cps-satx.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 8:29 AM
To: 'jwood@mattbran.com'
Cc: Mc Whirter, Daniel D.
Subject: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Mr. Wood,

As requested, Enfolio shortened and simplified the section on
Representations and Warranties.  The new language is highlighted on page 2
of the Appendix and states the following:

"Further and with respect to Customer only, Customer represents and
warrants
to Company continuing throughout the term of this Agreement as follows: (i)
all acts necessary to the valid execution and performance of this Agreement
have been duly adopted, (ii) with respect to the contractual obligations
hereunder and performance thereof, it is not entitled to claim immunity on
the grounds of sovereignty or similar grounds with respect to itself or its
revenues, (iii) its obligations to make payments hereunder are
unsubordinated obligations and such payments are operating and maintenance
costs which enjoy first priority of payment at all times under any and all
indentures to which it is a party."

Do you feel that this language is acceptable?  Thank you for your advice.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 5:17 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Cc: Mc Whirter, Daniel D.; ."'James.I.Ducote""@enron.com'"
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Please review the revised representations and warranties language. If
acceptable, please print 2 copies, sign and forward to Janet Wallis at
Enron for execution by Enron and return of one fully executed copy.
(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)

                    "Pfister,

                    Christian W."         To:     "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"

                    <CWPfister@cps        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>,

                    -satx.com>            "'James.I.Ducote@enron.com'"

                                          <James.I.Ducote@enron.com>

                    10/30/2000            cc:     "Mc Whirter, Daniel D."

                    12:18 PM              <DDMcWhirter@cps-satx.com>

                                          Subject:     RE: Enfolio Contract
with CPS

If you could redraft the "representations and warranties" provision to be
simpler and clearer, I think that we could agree to it.  The other items
look fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Wood [mailto:jwood@mattbran.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:45 AM
To: 'Pfister, Christian W.'
Cc: 'ksyates@cps-satx.com'; Howard Bye
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

My reading is that Enron seeks a continuing representation that (i) all
transactions have the appropriate approval, waiving any defense of lack of
authority, (ii) there is no sovereign immunity (something is left out of
thelanguage) defense to any transaction, (iii) payment for the gas will be
first in the flow of funds, and (iv) the obligations are not subject to
debt
restrictions or other public funds restrictions of the Texas Constitution,
statutes or CPS constituency documents.  I think we can legally make these
representations and warranties, but the language needs some work.  You
should ask them to redraft this provision so it is simpler and clearer.
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W. [mailto:CWPfister@cps-satx.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:16 PM
To: 'jwood@mattbran.com'
Subject: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Mr. Wood,

This is a spot gas contract with Enron that you reviewed on August 8th for
Mary Pelayo and Danny McWhirter.  Enron has added a paragraph under
"Representations and Warranties" that I would like you to review.  I am not
sure exactly what it means.  Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yates, Katherine S.
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:52 PM
To: Pfister, Christian W.
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Sounds like legal mumbo jumbo. I would advise getting John't input in case
he is more familiar with the reasoning behind this jargon.

Katherine S. Yates
CPS Attorney
353-2069

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W.
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:40 PM
To: Yates, Katherine S.
Subject: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Kathy,

This spot gas contract was reviewed by Jon Wood a few months ago.  The
following was added under "Representations and Warranties" by Enron.  I
have
highlighted the text in the attachment so you can see where it was
incorporated (page 2 of Appendix 1).

"Further and with respect to Customer only, Customer represents and
warrants
to Company continuing throughout the term of this Agreement as follows:
(i)
all acts necessary to the valid execution and performance of this Agreement
have been duly adopted, (ii) with respect to the contractual obligations
hereunder and performance thereof, it is not entitled to itself or its
revenues or assets from (a) suit, (b) jurisdiction of court, (c) relief by
way of injunction, order for specific performance or recovery of property,
(d) attachment of assets or (e) execution or enforcement of any judgment,
(iii) its obligations to make payments hereunder are unsubordinated
obligations and such payments are operating and maintenance costs which
enjoy first priority of payment at all times under any and all indentures
to
which it is a party, its constitutional and governing documents and
applicable law, and (iv) its obligations to make payments hereunder do not
constitute any kind of indebtedness of Customer or create any kind of lien
on, or security interest in, any property or revenues of Customer which, in
either case , is proscribed by any provision of its constitutional and
governing documents, any order to judgment of any court or other agency of
government applicable to it or its assets, or any contractual restriction
binding on or affecting it or any of its assets."

Do you think this is acceptable, or do you think I should show this added
paragraph to Jon Wood?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:51 PM
To: Pfister, Christian W.; Mc Whirter, Daniel D.
Cc: James.I.Ducote@enron.com; Janet.H.Wallis@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enfolio Contract with CPS

(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)

Attached please find a revised Enfolio Contract with CPS.  The changes
      incorporated in the attached contract are:
1)  "City Public Service (San Antonio)" has been changed to "The City of
      San Antonio, acting through City Public Service Board".
2)  The effective date has been changed to "October 1, 2000.
3)  The changes requested in items 1 and 2 of the addendum have been
      incorporated.
4) The Utilization of Small Business Concerns language has been added as
      the last item in Appendix "1", and
5)  An additional representation has been added at the end of the
      Representations and Warranties in Appendix "1" relating to the
      necessary authorizations with respect to the execution, delivery and
      performance by Customer of  this Agreement.

If these changes are acceptable please advise and we will forward two
      original copies for execution.

 - CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc


Nancy, I have just returned to Houston from New York.  I have not seen the
fax you mentioned.  Please call me or e-mail to me the information you need
me to consider.  Thank you.  Jim


Ted,

Sally asked me to forward this to you FYI.

Patti
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000 10:10 AM
---------------------------

Clare Ellis-Wood
02/17/2000 10:43 AM
To: Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Barry Pearce to Houston

Wanda

I have just spoken with Barry about arranging a visit for him to Houston.  He
mentioned the week of 28 February being good for him.  I hope this will suit
you and wonder if it will be possible to arrange any meetings with him on the
Tuesday 29 Feb and Wednesday  1 March? I will book for him to arrive on the
Monday and leave Houston on the Thursday.

Kind regards
Clare.


Any idea what amount of switching in gas equivalents does the implied demand
of resid equate to?

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           12/20/2000 03:05 AM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: APIs

JA:
See note on switching. It is hard to monitor the distiallte because any
switching is being absorbed by the incessant arrival of European cargoes. We
hope to have you guys some better numbers before the end of the week.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT on 20/12/2000
09:00 ---------------------------

Alex Mcleish@ENRON
20/12/2000 02:40
To: London, jennifer.fraser@enron.com, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: APIs

PIRA report attached - bit uninspired this week, like the stats.

Crude went back to the usual pattern and built 2 .4 mbbls, as opposed to an
implied draw (excl SPR) of 2 (although half of this in PADD 5). Perhaps
surprisingly, runs were down again, but most of this was non-CDU, and
gasoline bore the brunt of the output drop as a result.
Distillate demand, the main factor to watch, did fall, but not by much (240
kbd), and only another weak import showing prevented a build. The cold
weather and switching are definitely having an impact, as this demand is well
above last year's Y2K inflated levels. Most of the draw was in low sulphur
material, but PADD 1 still suffered a 500 kbbls drop in heating oil stocks.
However, it does sems to be building up in PADD 3.
Gasoline stocks did build, but interestingly only in blending components, not
the finished material. Evidence of high gas prices impacting on production?
Stocks rose in PADD 1 by almost the same amount as they fell in PADD 3.
Imports were very strong, however, at 500 kbd.
Again, the real shoker was resid - demand up 57% to 1600 kbd, an incredibly
high number, and clear evidence (if repeated next week) of switching.


John,

I met with Ben regarding the Precedent Agreement this evening.  He had the
following questions/comments:

1. "...Shipper's power plant construction by August 1, 2001, then either
Party may terminate this Precedent Agreement by providing the other Party
written notice of such termination.  ; provided that such right to terminate
must be exercised on or before August 3, 2001.  In any event, unless the
Shipper provides written notice to Transco on or before August 3, 2001 that
it will enter into a Service Agreement , the Precedent Agreement will
terminate automatically.

2. Can we make the Guaranty effective after August 3, 2001 if we do not
terminate the Precedent Agreement?

3. In talking to Gerald Nemec, it also occurred to me that we need to
determine any balance sheet effects of the Guaranty in relationship to this
project.  I will check on this tomorrow and let you know.

Thanks.

RDG


probably.  i'll see u there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:55 PM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy
Subject:	RE: BBALL

can't play - maybe we can pick someone up there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blanchard, Timothy
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:55 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE: BBALL

what about hull?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:41 PM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy
Subject:	BBALL

we need a fourth again


I dont know how 'international' the year end review will be. I will contact
Mike Jordan directly and find out specifically who the line should be. I have
discussed it with Mike when I was in London and his only concern was that the
move to London was in line with Sally's understanding and that you and she
was comfortable with it.

 Thanks for your help on this.

With thanks

Heidi

	Scott Mills@ECT
	17/11/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

Since a majority of the activity is power related, I would imagine that
Justin should roll into the overall power group in London.  They may have
other ideas!
The mid-year reviews were localized to Sydney only, will this be different at
year end?

SRM

HEIDI MASON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/16/2000 04:50 PM
To: Scott Mills@ECT
cc: sally.beck@enron.com
Subject: Reporting Line for Sydney Risk Officer

Scott

With all our reporting changing to London Office and now it appears some
restructure of risk and the broadening of Sally's role, what are we going to
do for the second report for our new risk manager, Justin Den Hertog - he has
taken over from Alan.

He reports to me locally, but functionally he would traditionally have
reported to you on behalf of Sally's area. I assume this has now moved with
the rest of us and would therefore be either James New or Mike Jordan in
London? Can you please advise me via return email as we are working on our
PEP stuff, reviews etc.

With thanks

Heidi


I've changed it to off-peak only. I was entering forward deals to exercise
options yesterday, and they were all RTC besides this one - thanks for
catching that. It should be good now.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   03/27/2001 11:52 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 428861.01

Kate, just happened to notice when they entered the leg 2 of the deal
428861.01.... is it suppose to be 7days a week, 24 hours a day,  the
428861.01 is off peak hours only.

Thanks


Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030305.txt


Shirley,

Please, send our logo to Debra.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000
06:33 PM ---------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 06/21/2000 01:59:38 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: seminar mugs

Vince:

Can your secretary forward to Debra Thomas <dthomas@rice.edu>  the Enron
logo in a Word document that Debra can use in a design for the Rice/Enron
Finance Seminar Series mugs?

Hope your summer is going well.

Thank you again for your kind assistance.

bbo


Sorry about the delay I have been waiting for info from New York and Germany.
---------------------- Forwarded by Fiona McNaught/LON/ECT on 06/04/2001
17:52 ---------------------------

Mike Jordan
04/04/2001 16:36
To: Fiona McNaught/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: actual numbers of staff

Fiona

Sally Beck would like some details on our Middle Office Headcount - can you
complete the following table of details and send to Patti please

Power Gas and Credit Risk ( including Head of RM ) 36
Power Gas and Credit Documentation ( including GCP ) 37
Power Gas and Credit Settlements   19
Power Gas and Credit Trade Accounting   24
Nordic Power      8
Metals London      80 ( ish )
Metals NY      21
Metals Recycling Germany    154

cheers

Mike


What's your idea?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jernigan, Steven [mailto:SJernig@entergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:57 AM
To: 'tstaab@enron.com'; 'ncortez@enron.com'
Subject: Let's talk trade

I want a good receiver.  You need a RB.


December 19, 2000

Today's Reminder:
Four Great Specials On Our Discount Fares

Southwest Airlines Gives You the Freedom to Travel
Happy Holidays!

And, Don't Forget:
Reserve and rent your car on southwest.com and
receive double credit for your rental in addition to the
double flight credits you already receive for your flights.
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

***************************************************************
Applies to ALL specials in this email:

*Discount Fares column
*7-day advance purchase
*Roundtrip travel required
*Overnight stay required
*Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
 that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
 itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
 a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
 passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.
*Purchase from December 14, 2000 through
 January 16, 2001, midnight Pacific Time

<*><*><*> We're In It For The Long Haul <*><*><*>
Coast to Coast for $99/$119 each way, based on
 roundtrip travel.
*Travel on a Tuesday, Wednesday or
 Saturday for $99 each way.
*Travel on a Monday, Thursday, Friday, or
 Sunday for $119 each way.
*Travel beginning January 3, 2001 through June 8, 2001
*Florida markets will be blacked out from March 15, 2001
 through April 15, 2001.
*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
 more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/dec2000_c2c.html

<*><*><*><*><*> This Is No Java Jive! <*><*><*><*><*>
The Northwest Coast and Intra-California
*Travel to Seattle, Portland, or Spokane, from Boise,
 for only $39 each way with roundtrip purchase or from
 Salt Lake City, Sacramento, Oakland, or San Jose
 for only $59 each way with rountrip purchase.
*Travel between northern and southern California for
 only $44 each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Travel beginning January 3, 2001 through June 8, 2001
*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
 more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/dec2000_northwest.html

<*><*><*><*> Midwest America On Sale <*><*><*><*>
This Will Jazz You Up and Deliver You From the Blues
*The short-haul markets for Chicago, St. Louis, and
 Kansas City for only $30 each way with roundtrip
 purchase.
*Travel beginning January 3, 2001 through February 15, 2001
*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
 more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/dec2000_midwest.html

<*><*><*><*><*><*> Florida On Sale <*><*><*><*><*><*>
*Travel to and from the state of Florida on fares of
 $39, $49, $59, or $79 each way with roundtrip purchase
*Travel beginning January 3, 2001 through February 15, 2001
*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
 more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/dec2000_florida.html

******* This is the Additional Information section *******
Additional Information You Need to Know About All
Four of Our Sales:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel Online may only be purchased with
 a credit card. Customers holding funds from
 a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
 who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
 those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods, such as President's Day,
 Spring Break, and Easter.

*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

*****DON'T FORGET! RENTAL CAR AVAILABILITY*****
II. Reserve and rent your car on southwest.com and
receive double credit for your rental in addition to the
double flight credits you already receive for your flights.
Receiving a free Award Ticket just got easier.
Check out this special offer at :
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Southwest Airlines e-mail updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [mark.guzman@enron.com]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Thanks for your help.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/15/2001 11:41 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:

Well done.  One other point:  If the PUC rules on the 27th that the rate
freeze is not going to end retroactively, that should put Ken Lay in a much
stronger position to negotiate with Glynn on reaching a deal on payment.

Best,
Jeff


There will be IT representatives on each of the floors again today. If you have any problems with functionality or performance, please ask one of them to assist you. If you are unable to locate someone quickly, feel free to call the bridgeline 1-800-711-8000 (PIN 3454709).

Our preference is to use the IT representatives if possible.

Thank you for your feedback yesterday and your continued cooperation.

Brian Ripley
713-345-4709 (work)
281-541-2927 (cell)