How is the research going on whether we can set up the plan the way we want
to?  My understanding is that you were going to do some research for us.
Thanks.  Michelle

"Wilson, Jeanne" <jkwilson@velaw.com> on 04/05/2000 11:25:23 AM
To: "'Michelle Cash'" <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>
cc: "Bloom, Brian" <bbloom@velaw.com>
Subject: RE: EIP Incentive Plan

Michelle,

 I am unclear as to what you are asking for below.  Vinson & Elkins
needs additional information before it will be possible to turn another
draft of the plan.  Specifically, I was under the impression that you were
going to review the second draft and give me additional comments.  Also, we
are researching whether the plan will qualify as a bonus plan (vs. a top hat
plan) and need to resolve that issue.  But most importantly, we cannot draft
a deferral provision for purchasing stock options or phantom stock
appreciation rights until we know the details of that provision will be
(such as whether you want it to tie in with an existing stock incentive plan
and the details of how you want it to work).  I am happy to redistribute a
copy of the March 16 draft to anyone you wish. Please call me if you wish to
discuss this.

 Best regards,
 Jeanne Wilson

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Cash [mailto:Michelle.Cash@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:27 AM
To: Gene Humphrey; fmackin@aol.com; Wilson, Jeanne; Susan Carrera; Aaron
Brown; Tony Jarrett
Cc: Kim Bolton
Subject: EIP Incentive Plan

I spoke with Corporate Compensation yesterday (Kim Bolton) about the option
of
paying for stock options/phantom stock with proceeds from the EIP incentive
plan.   She is working on obtaining approval for that provision.

Otherwise, I believe that we are ready to review a final version of the
plan.
Jeanne, could you please circulate one?

I'll be in San Antonio for the law conference the rest of the week, but this
process should not wait for me.  Once corporate comp gives it the ok, we
should
be ready to finalize it.

Michelle Cash


Thanks for forwarding mail to me.  I apologize for the inconvenience of
this.  My current e:mail address is sally.beck@enron.com, as suggested within
the past few months by the technology group that all addresses use the long
name.   HOWEVER, my e:mail address prior to that was sbeck@ect.enron.com.
That was printed on my business cards, many of which are still in circulation
I am sure.  When ECT became ENA, I changed my e:mail address to drop the ect
reference and to use my long name rather than sbeck.  So I can see why you
would receive my mail on occassion if someone is either making an educated
guess on the address or referencing my old card.  SInce there are at least 2
sbeck's here, have you thought about adopting use of your long name address
rather than the shorter version to help in further differentiating between
us?   That might help eliminate confusion going forward.


Hey Sweetie,

Wazzup!  Get up, Get Down, Get Funky, Get Loose!  I see that you are already
on the internet.  Send me something CUTE.

Love,

Mom


Check this out it goes on for ever.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dra. Ana Robles [mailto:villaalejandra@caribe.hn]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:53 AM
To: paul lucci
Subject: Fw: FELIZ NAVIDAD
Importance: High

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nilcio Duran" <Nilcio.Duran@ccmail.stdfruit.hn>
To: <villaalejandra@caribe.hn>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: FELIZ NAVIDAD

> Saludos..........
>
>
>


A reminder to the Houston crew. The meeting starts at 11:30. Please, be on
time.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
05:32 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
08/23/2000 03:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin
Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Rodney Keys/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava
Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, DeMonica
Lipscomb/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kirstee Hewitt/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew D
Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Guiseppe
Paleologo/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael SCHILMOELLER/ENRON@Gateway, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V
Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Praveen
Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Norma
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Presentation

Maureen Raymond and Elena Chilkina will give a presentation tomorrow
at our Thursday Staff meeting entitled "Introduction to the Metals Industry".

We will also have in attendance our new HR Rep, Norma Villareal and
Staffing Rep, Toni Graham.

See you there!

Shirley


IN THE MONEY: Another Sign Investors Don't Trust Enron
Dow Jones News Service, 11/26/01
Dynegy Board Silent On Status Of Enron Takeover >ENE DYN
Dow Jones News Service, 11/26/01
Enron, Banks Formalize $690M Debt Extension To Dec. 14
Dow Jones News Service, 11/26/01
Citigroup Has $2.38B Less To Lose On Enron Due To Swaps
Dow Jones Capital Markets Report, 11/26/01
Enron Is Sued Over 401(k) Plan; Plaintiffs Seek $850M
Dow Jones News Service, 11/26/01
STOCKWATCH Enron falls 14 pct on mounting concerns over Dynegy deal
AFX News, 11/26/01
USA: UPDATE 1-Enron shares slide lower as merger doubts intensify.
Reuters English News Service, 11/26/01
USA: Enron lawsuit seen as wake-up call for pensions.
Reuters English News Service, 11/26/01
USA: US Corp Bonds-Bonds tighten, analysts fret on Enron.
Reuters English News Service, 11/26/01
Petrobras, Petros, close to buying Enron's stakes in CEG/CEG Rio - report
AFX News, 11/26/01
TALES OF THE TAPE: Energy Traders' Perfect Storm Stalls
Dow Jones News Service, 11/26/01
INDIA: UPDATE 1-India's AV Birla group denies bid for Enron unit.
Reuters English News Service, 11/26/01
Enron's Stock, Bonds Drop on Concern for Dynegy Bid (Update8)
Bloomberg, 11/26/01

Dynegy Bonds Slip as Enron Purchase May Harm Credit Rating
Bloomberg, 11/26/01

ENRON SHARES SLIDES TO ALL-TIME LOW
CBS.MarketWatch.com, 11/26/01

IN THE MONEY: Another Sign Investors Don't Trust Enron
By Michael Rapoport

11/26/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
A Dow Jones Newswires Column

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- If you needed any further proof that investors no longer trust Enron Corp. (ENE), here's another piece of evidence - one that goes to the heart of the recent plunge in the company's stock.
Enron doesn't simply trade for less than its book value; it fell below that milestone weeks ago. No, now it trades for less than ONE-THIRD of its book value.
That's a rare level for a company of Enron's size and prominence. And it may mean, among other things, that investors have decided that they simply can't place any further faith in the veracity of Enron's earnings and balance-sheet figures, much-revised as they've been - something that has unnerving implications for any attempt to value the company fairly.
First, let's be clear about what this means. Enron stock is currently about $4 a share; the company's reported book value is about $12.90 a share. In other words, Enron stock sells for less than one-third of what shareholders would get if the company were to liquidate - were to turn all its assets into cash, pay off all its liabilities on its balance sheet and give what's left over to shareholders.
This is an uncommonly dismal level for any company, even a troubled one. For comparison's sake, Dynegy Inc. (DYN), which has agreed to buy Enron, trades at about three times book value, as does El Paso Corp. (EPG), a competitor of both companies. In fact, Enron has the second-lowest price-to-book ratio of any company in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index - only Conseco Inc. (CNC), another troubled company, is lower, by an eyelash.
Part of the problem is undoubtedly the continuing fear among investors that Dynegy's agreement to buy Enron will fall apart, and the belief that Enron will have to file for bankruptcy if it does, in which case Enron shareholders would be hard-pressed to realize any value. The Dynegy deal now amounts to about $10.60 per Enron share, itself well under Enron's book value; the huge premium that level offers over Enron's current stock price is an indication of the big risk investors see that the deal won't be consummated in its current form.
But given Enron's current woes, it's certainly also possible that Enron is trading at such a big discount to book value because investors don't feel they can trust the earnings and balance-sheet numbers coming out of Enron. Those numbers, after all, are the raw material that form the basis for valuing Enron, or any other company, by computing figures like price-to-book and price-to-earnings ratios.
And the Enron debacle has been all about the quality of those numbers, with Enron shifting assets off its balance sheet to outside limited partnerships from which some of its executives benefitted. In terms of those numbers, the ground has shifted underneath investors three separate times now - when the company slashed its reported shareholder equity by $1.2 billion to unwind its transactions with one of those partnerships, when it restated nearly five years' worth of earnings downward by a total of $586 million, and when it revealed that it could take further charges and was facing an imminent deadline to post collateral on a $690 million note. (That deadline has now been extended until Dec. 14.)
When you've gotten punched in the face three times, it's not unreasonable to fear there'll be a fourth blow, no matter how much the puncher assures you there won't be. Given Enron's insanely complicated structure, and the way bad financial news has dribbled out of the company over the past several weeks, who can guarantee there aren't more such shocks yet to come?
That's what investors appear to be fearing, and that may be part of the reason Enron stock has fallen so precipitously. Thanks to Enron's repeated demonstrations that its numbers can't be relied on, investors no longer have a firm, trustworthy basis on which to value the stock. And so, not surprisingly, the value is getting ratcheted down to the most conservative, bare-minimum level.
An Enron spokesman couldn't be reached for comment.
It's ironic, in a way. For a long time, it was hard to properly value Enron because its structure and finances were so complex and hard to decipher. Now it's hard to properly value Enron because the company's attempts to clarify its finances have made it clear that it's hard to expect investors to trust in their accuracy.
-By Michael Rapoport, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5976; michael.rapoport@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Dynegy Board Silent On Status Of Enron Takeover >ENE DYN
By Christina Cheddar
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

11/26/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- As the market continues to speculate about the status of Dynegy Inc.'s (DYN) takeover of Enron Corp. (ENE), Dynegy's board isn't offering its opinion.
"Any comments coming out of Dynegy are coming from the company's executives," said Jerry Johnson, a Dynegy board member who also is an executive vice president at Safeguard Scientifics Inc. (SFE).
Johnson declined to comment on any matters related the pending acquisition of its larger rival, and wouldn't say whether the board has been meeting to discuss the transaction.
Three other board members, through their representatives, declined to comment as well. Other non-executive directors on the 14-member board either weren't immediately available to comment or couldn't be reached.
As for Dynegy's management, spokesman John Sousa said the company's opinion on the deal remains the same since its last comments on Wednesday.
At that time, Dynegy Chairman and Chief Executive Chuck Watson said Dynegy was continuing its due diligence and was looking to accelerate regulatory approval of the deal.
According to Sousa, Dynegy worked through the holiday weekend gathering information as part of its due diligence efforts.
Meanwhile, Enron continued its discussions to raise between $500 million to $1 billion of additional financing, said Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne. The company also is working to restructure its debt by mid-December, she said.
But investors appear to be voting with their feet. Enron shares were recently down 18.3%, or 86 cents, to $3.85, while Dynegy shares slipped 2.7%, or $1.06, to $39.34. As a result, the already huge discount to the deal's offer price has grown even bigger as the market continues to signal the deal won't get completed on its original terms.
Under the terms of the transaction, Enron shareholders are to receive 0.2685 of a Dynegy share for each share outstanding, or about $8.98 billion, based on Dynegy's recent stock price.
At Enron's recent level, the stock is trading at a 64% discount to the Dynegy offer.
Neither Sousa or Denne would comment on the stock movement.
Dynegy has already provided Enron with a $1.5 billion cash infusion that is secured by Enron's pipeline assets. While that investment has helped Enron's near-term liquidity position, it remains unclear how long the company can remain solvent without any added investments.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166; christina.cheddar@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Enron, Banks Formalize $690M Debt Extension To Dec. 14
By Carol S. Remond and Christina Cheddar

11/26/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Of Dow Jones Newswires

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Enron Corp. (ENE) and a group of banks last week formalized an agreement to extend the due date on a $690 million syndicated loan by three weeks to Dec. 14.
The loan relates to one of Enron's consolidated limited partnerships that owns minority interests in power and energy projects around the world. Enron said last week that Standard & Poor's downgrade of its credit rating to "BBB-" had triggered an obligation to repay the loan by Nov. 27.
People familiar with the matter said last week that lead banks J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. and Enron will use the extension to negotiate a further postponement of the debt to the middle of 2002 when other Enron bank loans come due. About $1.75 billion of Enron's $3.5 billion in syndicated bank loans come due in May 2002 and will likely need to be restructured.
About $250 million of the assets securing the $690 million loan are in the process of being sold and will be used to pay down the loan, reducing the outstanding portion of the loan that will need to be restructured, those people familiar with the matter said.
Enron's shares and bonds continue to suffer from mounting uncertainties about the company's finances and whether those could force one-time rival Dynegy Inc. (DYN) to reconsider its offer to buy Enron, an offer that many see as Enron's only chance to avoid bankruptcy. Enron stock was recently down 18% to $3.84. Meanwhile, Enron bonds are also lower, with the 6.4% bonds due 2004 recently trading at a distressed level of 48 cents on the dollar.
Carol S. Remond; 201-938-2074; Dow Jones Newswires; carol.remond@dowjones.com
and Christina Cheddar; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Citigroup Has $2.38B Less To Lose On Enron Due To Swaps
By Christine Richard
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

11/26/2001
Dow Jones Capital Markets Report
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Citigroup Inc. (C) is expected to extend a hand to Enron Corp. (ENE) by renegotiating a $690 million payment due Nov. 27.
But investors shouldn't be concerned that the financial services giant is too exposed to the embattled energy trading company. Citigroup already may have laid off the loan and other exposure via a series of credit default swap transactions. That means more institutional investors left holding the bag if Enron isn't ultimately rescued from financial collapse by a takeover proposed by Dynegy Inc. (DYN).
Over the last few years, Citigroup has entered into at least six transactions that effectively would allow the bank to lay off the equivalent of $2.384 billion in Enron exposure.
Citigroup was instrumental in setting up Enron Credit Linked Notes Trust, Enron Credit Linked Notes Trust II and Yosemite Securities Trust I, which together raised $1.750 billion; Enron Sterling Credit Linked Notes Trust and Yosemite Securities Co., which raised a combined GBP325 million; and Enron Euro Credit Linked Notes Trust, which issued EUR200 million.
Citigroup, which acts as the default swap counterparty to the trusts, receives the return on the portfolio of single-A-plus-or-better-rated securities, purchased with the proceeds of the offerings, in exchange for providing the payout on the Enron exposure, according to Mary Ryan, director of synthetic securities ratings at Standard & Poor's.
As long as Enron remains out of bankruptcy, Citigroup continues to make payments on the notes, Ryan said.
If Enron defaults, Citigroup would cease making payments to the trust. The single-A-plus-or-higher-rated securities in the trusts would go to Citigroup in exchange for the same nominal amount of now in-default Enron debt obligations. And with speculation mounting that Dynegy will reduce, or maybe even scrap, its offer to buy Enron, the chances of a such a default-driven transfer would appear to be rising.
These notes essentially are synthetic Enron debts, meaning they act like Enron bonds in many respects, but lack key components that make holders true creditors of Enron.
For instance, the holders of these notes, because they don't possess actual Enron obligations - and won't unless the company defaults - are not involved in negotiations to restructure or rollover debt. It has been reported that Enron is engaged in active negotiations over the terms of its debts with creditors.
The synthetic notes all carry a rating equivalent to Enron's rating of triple-B-minus from Standard & Poor's and Baa3 from Moody's Investors Service.
The rating on the securities has been downgraded in recent weeks to reflect the downgrades in Enron's ratings.
Citigroup officials did not respond to requests for further details on the transactions. -By Christine Richard, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-2189;
christine.richard@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Enron Is Sued Over 401(k) Plan; Plaintiffs Seek $850M

11/26/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Enron Corp. (ENE) was sued Monday in the latest of at least three purported employee class action suits the company faces over lost 401(k) retirement savings due to the recent collapse of the price of Enron stock.
In a press release Monday, Eli Gottesdiener, a Washington, D.C. attorney who filed the latest suit on behalf of employees, said it seeks $850 million in plan losses, in part because the company sold Enron stock to its employees knowing the price was artificially inflated.
An Enron spokeswoman declined to comment.
Unlike two similar, recently filed suits against Enron, the latest also contends that Enron offered the stock without the required prospectus.
If proven, the sale without a prospectus "give workers the automatic right to rescind their purchases and receive their money back with interest," Gottesdiener said in a statement.
Enron "locked down" the retirement plan from Oct. 17 to Nov. 19, to make administrative changes, which prevented employees from selling Enron shares as the share price collapsed amid growing disclosures of financial problems.
Earlier this month, Houston-based Dynegy Inc. (DYN) offered to buy its far larger competitor in an all-stock deal that values Enron shares at $10.85 a piece, or about $9.2 billion.
Enron later disclosed that its future earnings would be substantially less than expected and shares fell sharply.
Enron currently trades at $4.05 a share, down from their 52-week high of $84.88 a share in December 2000.
The first suit was filed Nov. 13 on behalf of plaintiffs by Campbell Harrison & Wright LLP in Houston. A second was filed last week by Seattle-based Hagens Berman LLP.
-John Seward; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5400

(Corrected 04:34 PM)

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
STOCKWATCH Enron falls 14 pct on mounting concerns over Dynegy deal

11/26/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd
NEW YORK (AFX) - Shares of Enron Corp were down 14 pct in midsession trading as concerns continued to mount over the energy giant's acquisition by Dynegy Inc, with investors focusing more and more on the deal's breaking clause, dealers said.
At 12.45 pm, Enron shares were trading down 65 cents at 4.06 usd, a decline of 14.0 pct. Dynegy was down 1.60 usd at 38.80, amid broad declines in energy shares as crude prices sank.
The DJIA was up 57.70 points at 9,892.86. The S&P 500 was up 6.24 points at 1,143.27. The Nasdaq composite was up 11.94 points at 1,886.99.
Dealers said that with Enron shares having slid well below the Dynegy offer price of 9.85 usd a share, the ChevronTexaco affiliate may well reconsider its offer, or walk away from the deal all together.
"People are making the bet that perhaps Dynegy may cancel the deal, and that's there a lot more risk in playing the arbitrage," said Jefferies & Co market strategist Art Hogan.
The deal with Dynegy contains a "material adverse change" clause, which could be invoked to call the deal off, he said.
As part of its due diligence, Dynegy is examining details of Enron's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week, which reportedly contained information it had not received previously.
Enron shares have plunged further since the filing, in which Enron revealed a number of new financial problems including a possible obligation to repay a 690 mln usd note due Nov 27.
Enron subsequently received an extension on the repayment until mid-December.
Since the beginning of the year, Enron shares have lost over 90 pct of their value after it was revealed that the company would post hefty third-quarter charges linked to risky investments by the firm's former chief financial officer.
"At this point, with so much smoke around the fire, I think the shares are rightly valued," said Jefferies' Hogan.
ng/gc

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: UPDATE 1-Enron shares slide lower as merger doubts intensify.
By Janet McGurty

11/26/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
NEW YORK, Nov 26 (Reuters) - Shares of troubled energy giant Enron Corp. continued to lose ground on Monday amid fears that the proposed acquisition of the company by smaller rival Dynegy Inc. will fall through.
Enron stock was down 61 cents, or 12.9 percent, at $4.13 in active midmorning trade on the New York Stock Exchange. Dynegy has agreed to pay $10.55 per share for Enron.
"The market is acting like the deal is not going through or not going through at the original terms," said Michael Heim, an industry analyst at A.G. Edwards & Sons.
Heim said that among three possible scenarios - the deal goes through as planned, it is canceled, or it is restructured - the first is the least likely.
"Escape clauses" built into the Dynegy-Enron deal give the buyer the option to back out if there is serious deterioration in Enron's business or assets.
"Dynegy has a good claim that the 'material adverse condition' clause has already been triggered, either by the $690 million loan being accelerated, earnings (being) down or the ongoing trading business weakness," he said.
Last week Enron said it could be forced to pay a $690 million debt this week because of a credit downgrade, but the payment deadline has been delayed until mid-December.
Enron's recent admission that lower volumes at its trading business - the crown jewel that Dynegy most covets - could cause low fourth-quarter earnings raises the possibility that the trading business is losing its profitability. Continued lower volumes there would remove a key attraction for Dynegy.
"Every day that goes by where Enron trading volumes become less, it decreases the value of the assets Dynegy was trying to buy in the first place," Heim said. "Besides trading and marketing, what value does Enron have?"
The majority of Enron's physical assets are spoken for, with partnerships and creditors getting first dibs and Dynegy getting the first right to exercise its option to acquire Enron's Northern Natural Gas pipeline.
Dynegy, which is 26.5 percent-owned by energy giant ChevronTexaco , is to swap 0.2685 share of its own stock for each share of Enron. Shares of Dynegy were down $1.27, or 3.1 percent, at $39.13 in midmorning NYSE trade.
Enron agreed to a Dynegy buyout after it was overwhelmed by a series of problems, including a U.S. regulatory probe of off-balance-sheet dealings by its officers, a $1.2 billion cut in shareholder equity, and cuts in its credit ratings.
Enron subsequently restated its earnings, but investor unease snowballed and its share began tumbling. The shares were above $90 in August 2000.
Heim said he was not sure that EnronOnline, Enron's online trading platform, is the premier property it once was.
"Two years ago it had some value, but now others have been able to duplicate it. It's not the computer systems - it's the traders and network that Enron had. If those go away, the value lessens.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: Enron lawsuit seen as wake-up call for pensions.

11/26/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
HOUSTON, Nov 26 (Reuters) - A Washington, D.C., lawyer said Monday he hopes heavy losses suffered by Enron Corp. employees will spur Congress to limit employee investments in their employers' stock through 401 (k) retirement plans.
"How many workers have to lose both their jobs and their retirement savings before Congress steps in and puts a stop to this by placing a cap on the amount of company stock that can be in a 401 (k) plan?" lawyer Eli Gottesdiener asked.
Gottesdiener released a statement Monday saying he had filed a lawsuit on behalf of employees of the beleaguered energy giant who have lost an estimated $850 million on Enron stock held in their 401 (k) retirement accounts.
The suit is the third one filed against Enron that alleges the company breached its fiduciary duty to employees by encouraging them to invest in its stock at artificially inflated prices. All three suits seek class-action status.
Enron's shares have fallen from a high of $90 in August 2000 to less than $5 today, their decline accelerating since Oct 16 amid a series of disclosures about its deteriorating finances.
Like many other companies, Enron makes matching contributions to its employees' 401 (k) retirement accounts in its own stock. It also requires them to hold the stock they receive in matching contributions until they turn 50.
Enron employees were also prevented from selling Enron stock held in retirement accounts for several weeks from mid-October due to a change in the retirement plan's administrator.
Gottesdiener said investment advisors recommend investing no more than 15 percent of a portfolio in a single stock, but that participants in 401 (k) plans offering employer stock as a choice typically hold 33 percent of their portfolio in that stock.
"Congress sensibly placed a 10 percent limit on company stock in traditional defined benefit plans back in 1974, but at the behest of the corporate lobby, it placed no such cap on defined contribution plans," he said.
The absence of such a cap in defined-contribution 401 (k) plans was "completely indefensible," he said.
Gottesdiener's suit alleges that Enron violated federal securities law by offering and selling Enron stock to employees without issuing a prospectus. If proven, this would give workers the right to reverse their purchases, he said.
Gottesdiener is also involved in class action pensions litigation against New York Life Insurance Co. and SBC Communications Inc..

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: US Corp Bonds-Bonds tighten, analysts fret on Enron.

11/26/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Nov 26 (Reuters) - U.S. corporate bonds outperformed
Treasuries on Monday as traders edged back to their desks
following the Thanksgiving Day weekend, in the midst of a broad
revival for corporate bonds of all stripes.
In secondary trading, spreads, the yield difference between
the bonds and comparable maturity U.S. Treasuries, tightened about
0.01 percentage point.
"I would expect a continuation of the tightening, especially
with Treasury interest rates going up," said one trader. "Absolute
corporate yields are starting to look pretty attractive."
Corporate bonds, especially junk bonds, have outperformed
Treasuries this month as investors developed a new tolerance for
risk. Though absolute returns for investment-grade corporate bonds
are negative, they are even worse in the Treasury market, where
investors appear more convinced that the current U.S. economic
downturn won't be deep or long.
"The successes in Afghanistan and some milder-than-anticipated
economic data have combined to increase investor appetite for
risk," wrote fixed-income research service CreditSights Inc. in a
report dated Monday. "While the severity and swiftness of the bond
market's correction was a surprise, it hasn't changed our basic
view of U.S. corporate bonds and we continue to recommend
overweight positions."
This week's forward calendar remains quiet.
In early trading, 10-year Treasuries rose 10/32, as their
yields fell to 4.971 percent.
ENRON
Market participants are closely watching Houston-based Enron
Corp. as the largest U.S. energy trader tries to merge
with smaller cross-town rival Dynegy Inc. , keep its
investment-grade credit ratings, and manage a load of $9.15
billion of debt and other obligations, much of which is unsecured
and coming due within 13 months.
Of this debt amount, $690 million could come due by
mid-December, and $3.9 billion immediately if Enron falls to junk
status. The key to resolution of this matter, some observers
believe, is Enron's banks.
"The goal of the banks now is to re-cut their exposure to gain
as much structural seniority or asset liens as possible, take out
fees, raise rates, take down total exposure, and generally improve
their risk-profile under multiple scenarios," said CreditSights.
"The very bankers who are supplying liquidity through new
secured bank lines and who are rumored to be considering equity
investments are the ones on the hook (and unsecured) for $3
billion in bank loans," wrote Carol Levenson, an analyst for
GimmeCredit, another fixed-income research service. "If Dynegy
backs out (in the interest of self-preservation), these vital bank
renegotiations might save Enron but leave unsecured bondholders as
the patsies."
Enron's existing 6.4 percent notes maturing in 2006 and 6.75
percent notes maturing in 2009 were bid on Friday at 57 cents on
the dollar, down from around par on October 12, before Enron first
reported third quarter results, which it later revised downward.
Enron shares have fallen 94 percent this year to their lowest
level since early 1989.
DATA
Investment-grade and junk bond spreads narrowed 0.1 and 0.27
percentage point last week, respectively, to 1.68 and 7.84
percentage points, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. Junk bond
spreads have narrowed 1.45 percentage points this month.
For the month, junk bonds have returned 2.996 percent, while
investment-grade corporate bonds have lost 2.355 percent and
Treasuries 3.488 percent, Merrill Lynch said. For the year, the
respective bonds are up 4.777, 9.634 and 6.565 percent.
For a complete list of upcoming or recently priced bond deals,
please click on .

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Petrobras, Petros, close to buying Enron's stakes in CEG/CEG Rio - report

11/26/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd
SAO PAULO (AFX) - Petroleo Brasileiro SA and its pension fund Petros are close to winning regulatory approval to purchase Enron Corp's stakes in gas distributors CEG and CEG Rio, daily Valor Economico reported.
Valor said Petrobras last week reached an agreement with the Regulatory Agency for Public Service Concessions of Rio de Janeiro local authorities, under which it agreed to undertake a series of investments in exchange for approval to acquire Enron's 13.38 pct stake in CEG and its 33.75 pct stake in CEG Rio.
It said the deal now passes to Rio de Janeiro governor Anthony Garotinho for approval.
as For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
TALES OF THE TAPE: Energy Traders' Perfect Storm Stalls
By Christina Cheddar

11/26/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES (This story was published originally Friday)

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Here's one 2001 outlook that couldn't have been more wrong.
Around this time last year, pundits and fund managers were touting "the perfect storm" of market forces that were coming together to make the energy trading business one to watch in 2001.
Then came the California power crisis, and allegations of price-gouging and fears of credit defaults began to cloud the outlook for the group. That was followed by renewed volatility in power prices, and this time the prices were headed down, not up.
And then came a crushing blow against trading firms - the unraveling of the industry's largest player, Enron Corp. (ENE).
Simply put, the perfect storm stalled, and a business once buoyed by high gas prices, strong demand and tight supply now lies in tatters.
The stocks of companies whom some say should be valued more like growth stocks than utilities are instead mired at around nine-times earnings - about where traditional utilities trade.
And the chance for recovery in 2002?
Basu Mullick, portfolio manager of the Neuberger Berman Partners fund, is willing to bet there is. He thinks energy traders deserve at least the same price-to-earnings multiple as the broader market's median, which is currently between 16- to 17-times future earnings, he said. It's just a matter of time before the stocks get there.
"They were just recovering from Gray Davis," Mullick said, referring to the governor of California, who had accused "out-of-state" energy traders of artificially inflating the price of power in the state, and triggering the state's energy crisis. "Now, they are recovering from Enron."
The fund manager also blames lower commodity prices, warm weather and poor demand for the recent weak performance in the group.
"Energy convergence companies are putting up terrific growth rates," he said. "I don't think they should get the same valuation as a garden-variety utility."
Still, others think the stock market is continuing to make distinctions between the energy traders by taking a harder look at the companies' strategies and financial disclosures.
Enron's precarious financial situation underscores the importance of accounting issues. Although many of Enron's financial problems aren't solely the fault of mark-to-market accounting issues, there has been growing attention paid to this form of financial reporting because of the earnings volatility it can create.
Answers Elude Investors

Investors are asking hard questions, and not always getting the answers they want.
Using mark-to-market methods, a company calculates the fair market value of a commodity position - whether it's a contract, an option, a swap, etc. - at the time, even if the value of the position is realized over a longer period. The problem with this method is the actual cash a company realizes from the position might not be the same value the company calculated in its original assessment. Also, sometimes it isn't easy to calculate the fair value of the commodity position. This is particularly true in instances where the market for the commodity isn't liquid.
Over time, companies with the highest level of disclosure regarding their mark-to-market gains will most likely trade at higher multiples to counterparts that provide little or no disclosure, said ABN AMRO Inc. analyst Paul Patterson.
Encouragingly, it appears companies may already be responding to the call for added disclosure. According to a survey Patterson conducted, more companies with energy trading units were willing to disclose the details of their mark-to-market accounting practices during third-quarter conference calls compared with those in the second quarter.
Patterson said he prefers earnings that are cash-based.
"All things being equal, we believe reported earnings that more closely reflect the timely realization of cash have a higher quality associated with them than earnings that do not," he said.
He expects investors to become smarter and learn to distinguish between earnings growth through accrual accounting and growth fueled by mark-to-market accounting.
At the end of the day, it is not a matter of simply producing profits, but being able to say where those earnings came from, said one investor, who manages a pension fund.
Some investors also may be placing a greater emphasis on the cash flow the energy merchants produce.
Tim O'Brien, portfolio manager of the Gabelli Utilities Fund, said energy merchants that own the physical power assets to back up their trading positions should trade at a premium to an independent power producers and traditional utility companies. Still, the stocks should be valued at less than the growth rate of the company because of their heavy exposures to commodity prices.
Energy merchants include companies such as Dynegy Inc. (DYN), Duke Energy Corp. (DUK) and Dominion Resources Inc. (D).
According to O'Brien, the group never deserved to have the price-to-earnings multiples above 20- to 30-times earnings, which were once paid for the stocks.
"We all got sucked up by the up-leg of the cycle and forgot just how cyclical these companies are," O'Brien said, adding that the average multiple should be in the high single-digits to the high-teens.
As for independent power producers - which are companies without regulated operations that own power plants to generate electricity to sell and trade in the wholesale market - the group may wind up being valued on the basis of the replacement costs of the assets in their portfolio, according to O'Brien.
"One analogy is that they are basically like commercial real-estate plays," O'Brien said.
That could mean stocks such as Calpine Corp. (CPN), which is already in the lower-half of its trading range, may have further to fall.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166; christina.cheddar@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
INDIA: UPDATE 1-India's AV Birla group denies bid for Enron unit.

11/26/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
(Recasts with denial, comments from financial institution in paragraphs 5-6)
BOMBAY, Nov 26 (Reuters) - The Aditya Vikram Birla Group, a leading Indian conglomerate, on Monday denied newspaper reports it was looking to buy U.S. energy giant Enron Corp's 65-percent stake in the beleaguered Dabhol Power Company.
"There has been no expression of interest in Dabhol. We are not interested," a top AV Birla group official told Reuters.
Two leading Indian business dailies earlier said the group, whose interests range from textiles to cement and carbon black, is eyeing Dabhol to expand its interests in the domestic power sector.
The Economic Times and the Financial Express said the group was exploring the possibility of submitting an expression of interest to Indian financial institutions to buy Enron's stake in the company.
An official of state-run Industrial Development Bank of India, the leading financier of the $2.9 billion project in the western state of Maharashtra, said he has not heard from the Birla group.
"We have not received any official communication from them," the official, who did not wish to be identified, told Reuters.
The spokesman for Dabhol was not available for comment.
FIGHTING FOR SURVIVAL
Enron Corp, which is fighting for survival in the United States amidst investor doubts over its corporate governance practices, owns 65 percent of Dabhol. General Electric Co and Bechtel own 10 percent each, while the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) owns 15 percent.
Dabhol and MSEB have been fighting over payment defaults and high tariffs for over a year. The dispute has affected India's efforts to attract foreign investment in the power sector and caused Enron and its U.S. partners to announce plans to exit the project.
Tata Power Company Ltd, India's largest private sector utility firm, and BSES Ltd, another utility company and a member of India's largest conglomerate, the Reliance Group, are already in talks to buy Enron's stake.
The AV Birla Group has adopted the route of mergers and acquisitions in recent years to consolidate its position in key industries.
Last week, one of its group companies, Grasim Industries Ltd, bought a 10-percent stake in India's largest cement maker, Larsen & Toubro Ltd
Earlier this year, Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd, another group company, entered the information technology sector by buying out France's Groupe Bull SA's 50.35 percent stake in PSI Data Systems
But the group's track record in the power sector has been less than impressive.
Two joint ventures with Britain's Powergen Plc to produce over 1,000 megawatts of electricity in two Indian states have not made much headway since they were announced in the mid-1990s.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Enron's Stock, Bonds Drop on Concern for Dynegy Bid (Update8)
2001-11-26 16:45 (New York)

Enron's Stock, Bonds Drop on Concern for Dynegy Bid (Update8)

     (Adds analyst comment in 4th paragraph.)

     New York, Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp.'s stock price
declined to a 14-year low and its bonds plunged 10 points on
concern the company won't secure $1 billion in fresh capital,
threatening its plan to be acquired by Dynegy Inc.

     ``The clock is definitely ticking,'' said Jon Kyle
Cartwright, a debt analyst at Raymond James and Associates. ``The
question is the survivability of Enron.''

     J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. executives met
today to line up investors for as much as $2 billion of bonds
convertible into stock. The company needs the money to operate
until Dynegy completes its $23 billion purchase. Dynegy unveiled
its plan to make the acquisition on Nov. 9.

     Enron shares and bonds, which opened lower, tumbled after 1
p.m. when no announcement for fresh financing was made. Enron's
6.4 percent notes that mature in 2006 plunged to 48 cents on the
dollar, down from 55 cents on Friday. The bonds now yield 26
percent. Enron shares declined 15 percent, or 70 cents, to $4.01.

     Concern that rival Dynegy may change or cancel its bid for
Enron has pushed Enron's stock down 55 percent in the past week.
Enron's shares had plummeted 86 percent since mid-October after
the company reported a $618 million third-quarter loss and said
expansion into water, telecommunications and retail-energy sales
cost it $1.01 billion.

     ``You haven't heard anything from Dynegy today, and that is a
bit scary,'' said Andy Palmer, who doesn't hold Enron bonds in the
$2 billion he helps manage at ASB Capital Management Inc. in
Washington.

     Part of the third-quarter charge was connected with limited
partnerships run by the chief financial officer. He was ousted,
and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission started an
investigation into Enron's accounting. The company earlier this
month restated its earnings for the past four years.

                        Talks on $1 Billion

     Under the buyout, Enron investors would receive 0.2685 Dynegy
share for each share held. That valued Enron at $10.41 a share, 21
percent more than Enron's share price that day.

     On Friday, the buyout valued Enron at $10.85 a share, more
than double Enron's closing price of $4.71. The widening of the
difference between the value of the offer and Enron's stock price
indicates investors doubt the buyout will go through.

     Shares of Enron traded as low as $3.76 today, rebounding to
close at $4.01. The stock was the most active in U.S. trading
Wednesday and Friday. Dynegy dropped $1.15, or 2.85 percent, to
$39.25. The stock has fallen 30 percent this year. Both companies
are based in Houston.

     Egan-Jones Ratings Co. lowered its rating on Enron's credit
today to ``BB-'' from ``BB.'' ``Dynegy needs to show its support,
or Enron will slide,'' the firm said in a report.

     Moody's Investors Service hasn't issued a report on Enron
since the company filed its 10-Q quarterly report with the SEC a
week ago. The ratings agency's analysts haven't returned calls for
comment.

     Moody's cut Enron's long-term credit rating on Nov. 9, though
it maintained an investment grade.

                          `More Problems'

     ``Time is not Enron's friend,'' said Stewart Morel, co-head
of investment grade debt research at UBS Warburg LLC. ``There is
increased concern in the market that there may be more problems
that are yet to be disclosed.''

     On Wednesday, Enron got a three-week reprieve from lenders on
a $690 million note due this week, giving the company more time to
restructure its finances. Dynegy Chief Executive Officer Chuck
Watson said he was ``encouraged'' by the commitment to extend the
note payment, as well as the closing of a $450 million credit
facility, and that Dynegy remained committed to the merger.

     Terms of the $690 million note were outlined for the first
time in the Enron filing a week ago. Enron also said that it has
less than $2 billion in cash and credit lines left. If the
company's cash reserves run too low, Enron's credit rating may be
cut below investment grade. That would trigger $3.9 billion in
debt repayments for two affiliated partnerships.

     Enron said in the filing that fourth-quarter profit might be
hurt by a drop in its trading business. Companies such as Aquila
Inc. and Mirant Corp. have reduced their activity with Enron
because of credit concerns.

     ``Should the Dynegy deal fall through, we don't view it
likely that Enron would be able to remain as a stand-alone
company,'' Youngberg of Edward Jones said. ``Without Dynegy, the
credit rating will fall, causing their trading business to dry up
further.''

     Enron, the biggest energy trader, once handled about a
quarter of U.S. gas and power transactions.

     Enron's bankers met with leveraged buyout firms and two
industrial companies to seek an investment, the New York Times
reported last week. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.
agreed to terms that give each of them a $250 million equity stake
as part of a transaction to be completed today.

Dynegy Bonds Slip as Enron Purchase May Harm Credit Rating
2001-11-26 15:16 (New York)

Dynegy Bonds Slip as Enron Purchase May Harm Credit Rating

     New York, Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Dynegy Inc. bonds have
fallen as much as 9 percent this month on investor concern the
energy trader's proposed $23 billion purchase of rival Enron Corp.
will erode its credit rating.

     Dynegy's 6.88 percent coupon notes due in 2011 are trading at
$932 per $1,000 face value, down from $1,024 last month, according
to Merrill Lynch & Co. data. Yield on the debt has risen to 7.9
percent from 6.5 percent as investors demand more return to
compensate for the increased risks of the securities.

     Dynegy's credit is rated ``Baa3'' at Moody's Investors
Service, the lowest rung of investment grade, and ``BBB+'' at
Standard & Poor's, two levels higher. Each ratings company said it
may cut Dynegy's credit rating if it buys Enron, which comes with
about $15 billion in debt and a regulatory inquiry into financial
partnerships set up to keep debt off its books.

     ``If you put Dynegy and Enron together it will have a
detrimental effect on Dynegy's credit rating,'' said Tim Nelson,
senior credit analyst at U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Cos. in
Minneapolis, which holds Dynegy bonds.

     Dynegy's 7.45 percent coupon notes due in 2006 are trading at
$1,019 per $1,000 face value, down from $1,085 last month,
according to Merrill. The notes yield almost 7 percent, up from
5.4 percent.

     Enron's credit is rated ``Baa3'' at Moody's and ``BBB-'' at
S&P, the lowest level of investment grade. Both ratings companies
are reviewing the credit for a possible downgrade and say Dynegy's
buyout plan is what's keeping the grades above junk.

     ``I don't think right now anybody knows exactly what Enron
is,'' said Mark Simenstad, who holds Dynegy bonds in the $5
billion he helps manage at Lutheran Brotherhood.

     ``Dynegy has proven to be pretty well-managed over the years
so you have to give them the benefit of the doubt here,''
Simenstad said. ``The hope is that if there's something they don't
understand they'll walk away.''

     Dynegy has $3.9 billion of bonds outstanding, most of which
come due between 2002 and 2011, according to Bloomberg data.

     Shares of Houston-based Dynegy, which topped $47 two weeks
ago after Chief Executive Chuck Watson said the Enron purchase
would boost earnings by at least 35 percent next year, fell $1.30
to $39.10 in mid-afternoon trading today. Enron's shares, down 92
percent this year, fell as much as 80 cents, or 17 percent, to
$3.91, a the lowest since 1987.

ENRON SHARES SLIDES TO ALL-TIME LOW

By CBS.MarketWatch.com

4:53 PM ET Nov 26, 2001

HOUSTON (CBS.MW) -- Enron shares fell as much as 20 percent Monday,
crashing through the $4 level for part to set an all-time low and cast
additional doubt on the energy merchant's plan to be acquired by rival
Dynegy.

Enron (ENE) set a new all-time low of $3.76 Monday afternoon before
closing at $4.01, off 70 cents. More than 60 million shares changed
hands, making it the most active issue on the New York Stock Exchange.

The stock has lost about half its value since Dynegy announced an
agreement to buy Enron on Nov. 9 and more than 85 percent of its value
in the past month.

Meanwhile, shares of Dynegy (DYN) lost $1.15, or 2.8 percent, to stand
at $39.25.

The collapse in Enron's share price has made it more likely that Dynegy
and Enron will have to renegotiate the terms of their original deal, in
which 0.2685 of a Dynegy share would be exchanged for each outstanding
Enron share.

However, the Financial Times reported that Dynegy remains confident of
its ability to complete a deal for Enron, which has been seeking $500
million in private equity capital to shore up its finances.

"We continue to hear reports the Enron's energy marketing and trading
business, once the crown jewel of the company, has eroded badly with
counterparties only willing to do shorter-term deals," A.G. Edwards
& Sons analysts Charles Fishman and Douglas Fischer wrote in a
research note Friday.

Enron investors do not believe that the merger is likely to occur under
the current terms, the analysts said.

Chance of Dynegy backing out

_______________________________________________________________________

On Monday, Michael Heim, also of A.G. Edwards, attributed Enron's
latest stock drop to "growing belief that the likelihood of the (merger)
deal is not so likely."

He pointed out that the outlook for Enron is "not very favorable" but
in the meantime, it's doing everything it can to stay "afloat" while
working on closing the deal.

Last week, Enron said it got a bank extension on a $690 million note to
mid-December. The note was originally set to come due in 2003, but was
bumped up to Nov. 26 due to a rating downgrade at Standard & Poor's.
<http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B81418CA4%2D11A5%2D4C7C%2DA602%2DCF3DA4BCAA7B%7D>

The payment by itself is manageable because Enron has about $2 billion
in cash on its hands, Heim said, but "the event moves Enron's merger one
step closer to the point in which Dynegy is able to exercise the
merger's material adverse condition clauses and back out of, or
restructure, the merger deal."

Heim has a "sell" rating on the stock.


The following would be used only in response to media questions regarding
PG&E credit exposure.

Enron does not comment on specific credit exposures.  We are confident we
have established adequate reserves related to energy issues in California and
regardless of what happens there we are also confident we will meet our 2001
(recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

(If pressed on the accuracy of the amount listed in PG&E's declaration)
There are lots of numbers being tossed around for all parties that are owed
money by PG&E.  All of them are subject to to modification as information is
corrected or updated.  The numbers in PG&E's initial filing were estimates
based on six month old PG&E data that may have been assembled very quickly.

(If pressed on the amount in the creditor committee letter)  Enron will not
comment on specific credit exposures.  We will not confirm or deny any such
numbers rumored to be in confidential correspondence.  Any number presented
would need to be further examined relative to collateral, reserves and other
credit offsets available under the circumstances.  Again, we are very
confident that no event related to this issue will prevent us from meeting
our 2001 (recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

If we are asked if we filed to be on the creditor committee, I would confirm
that we did, and we are.

Mark


FYI - See below.  Deb

----- Forwarded by Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 11:04 AM -----

	Teresa Callahan@ENRON
	08/28/2000 10:59 AM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia
Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
John Swafford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greek Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James L
Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Becky Stephens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Norman/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lanette Earnest/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Cole/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Geneva Holland/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sylvia
Hu/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wanda LaBaume/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Johnson Leo/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Monica Butler/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Thatcher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hardie Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol
Essig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Taria Reed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Ng/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angela Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed Dissolutions/Cancellations - 3 Entities

The below listed companies are being considered for
dissolution/cancellation.  Please let me know by Friday, September 8, 2000 if
there is any reason not to terminate.  If I receive no responses, we will
proceed with the dissolutions/cancellations.
ENACT I, L.L.C.,  a Delaware limited liability company
ENACT II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
WINRS LLC 1999-1, a New York limited liability company

Please distribute this memo to all interested parties within your group.

Teresa A. Callahan
Corporate Secretary's Office
EB4804    Ext. 58444


Sick  of static & dropped calls?  Worried that you or your loved ones won't be able to summon help in a crisis?   The Amazing ezBooster is the solution!   Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell   The Amazing ezBooster Can Save Your Life!!! *For the lowest price anywhere  - and a FREE BONUS for orders of 3 - you can INSURE your safety & that  of your loved ones!!!   Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell   You won't believe our prices -- these are not misprints - and don't overlook  the BONUS on quantities of 3!!!!   Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell     OUR *BEST DEAL* ON THE AMAZING ezBOOSTER --    *3 for only $12.99!!!!!!*   PLUS THE SPECIAL BONUS - FREE!  AN AMERICAN PEN -- SHOW  PRIDE IN OUR GREAT  COUNTRY!!!!   Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell   Shipping & Handling for all quantities is $5.00, and you may order in  individual units, as follows:               1  Amazing ezBooster for $5.99 .......2 Amazing             ezBoosters  for $9.99                         (By the way, folks-*these sell in retail stores & on TV for $19-$29!!)                           We very much appreciate your business, and in closing wish to remind you  not to forget -              IN  EMERGENCIES, GOOD CELL-PHONE RECEPTION MAKES             *all*  THE DIFFERENCE   For more great deals, and to learn of our donations, with your help, to  the Red Cross Relief Fund, please visit us SaveRealBig.com


Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 12/07/00 03:57 PM
-----

	Allison Easton@EES
	12/07/00 03:49 PM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: The intent of the voter is unclear

 - winner.jpg


This is a draft proposal that our coalition, ARM, sketched out on a
transition to a competitive default provider.  Any  thoughts/concerns with
the draft proposal will be appreciated.  Thanks.

Mona
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 09/21/2000
02:27 PM ---------------------------

"Counihan, Rick" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com> on 09/20/2000 07:19:07 PM
To: "'athomas@newenergy.com'" <athomas@newenergy.com>, jleslie@luce.com
cc: arm@phaser.com, jleslie@luce.com
Subject: RE: Proposal for Transition to New Default Service Provider

Oops,  forgot to attach my handiwork....

-----Original Message-----
From: athomas@newenergy.com [mailto:athomas@newenergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:42 PM
To: jleslie@luce.com
Cc: arm@phaser.com; jleslie@luce.com
Subject: Re: Proposal for Transition to New Default Service Provider

Here are my edits.  I did not do much flushing out of arguments to support
positions in the piece.

 - Rick Draft 1.doc


Here is an update on the activities for E-Trans.  Please remember that we are
under confidentiality agreements with the other parties of E-Trans and this
must not be discussed outside the Company.

It appears that the other parties of E-Trans are willing to go to the next
level of discussions on E-Trans and we hope to start discussions of the
commercial and policy issues as early as next week.  The additional parties
will be ALSTOM/ESCA, PJM, CalPx, and APX.  We will begin to discuss the
technical detailing the meshing of the forward and real-time markets and
system integration the following week.

We will also have two ALSTOM/ESCA employees that will be based in Houston to
support the project for the next four weeks.

The Task List and Schedule is as follows:

1. Prepare ESCA Consulting Agreement
2. Determine Commercial Structure for E-Trans
3. Detailed Description of each parties responsibility
4. Begin Technical Discussions
 a. Meshing the real-time and forward markets (Policy)
 b. Integrating the system  (Technical)
6. Product for FERC Filing
 a. Make off-the-self manual (Thane)
 b. FERC Tariff

September 21, 2000
Commercial and Policy Meeting
Chicago
Attendees:
John Florey CalPx
Ed Cazalet/Ralph Samuelson APX
Kenneth Laughlin PJM
Randy Berry Alstom/Esca
Jim Steffes Enron
Janice More
Jeff Brown
Thane Twiggs

September 27-28
Technical Meeting
Houston Woodland,s Conference Center
Attendees:
Andy Ott PJM
Randy Berry ESCA ?
David Sun
Ralph Samuelson? APX
John Flory CALPX
Steve Walton Enron
Lloyd Will
Charles Yeung
Jeff Brown
Thane Twiggs

October 4-5
Technical Meeting
TBD


Matt Motley
ref: 478877
Amerex shows cp as AEP not Sempra


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042304.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   4.68 / Final:   4.65)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

* European Transactions, Percentage, and Notional Value unavailable today due to Holiday.

Due to size constraints on the Outlook System, the Public Report can no longer be included in the same email with the Weekly Management report. The Public Report is still accessible, however, at the intranet site address listed below. For this week, we will also be sending a supplemental email with the Public Report attached.
The Weekly Management and Public reports can now be accessed directly through the EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access these report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site, please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose at x31670.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Jeff,
You had suggested some "wholesalers" and utilities the conference and I don't
know which if any are pure generating companies.  Would you say that SCE and
PG&E suffer from high prices and therefore support price caps?  We're thinking
of Bryson and Glynn and I want to make sure someone can speak to the issue of
price caps scaring away investment.  Would Southern and Reliant fit this bill?

Thanks a ton.  Sorry that the school's fundraiser called, I hope that didn't
bother you.
Rob

Here are your wholesalers and utilities:

 * Southern Energy-CA
 * Dynegy
 * Enron
 * PG&E Gen
 * APX
 * Calpine
 * Reliant
 * Sempra
 * PG&E
 * LADWP-David Freeman
 * Duke Corp-Richard Priori
 * PECO-Corban McNeill
 * Cynergy-Jim Rogers
Sierra Pacific-Walter Higgins

Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football299.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1218e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1218c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1218v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1218t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1218ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Joe Horn, WR NO - Matty Updated 12/21/01
Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Frank Updated 12/21/01
A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Tori Updated 12/21/01
Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.

Kurt Warner, QB STL - Hunter Updated 12/21/01
Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.

Rich Gannon, QB OAK - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Russell
Updated 12/21/01
Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Marvin Minnis, WR KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01

Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.

Tony Richardson, RB KC - Neal/McKay Updated 12/21/01
Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Gonzalez, TE KC - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.

Brett Favre, QB GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01
Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.

Trent Green, QB KC - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01

Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01
Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.

Johnnie Morton, WR DET - Hunter Updated 12/21/01
Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.

Reggie Wayne, WR IND - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.

Amani Toomer
, WR NYG - Tori Updated 12/21/01
Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.

Marvin Harrison, WR IND - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.

Duce Staley, RB PHI - Giggles Updated 12/21/01

Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.

Shawn Bryson, RB BUF - Neal/McKay Updated 12/21/01
Bryson will start in place of the injured Travis Henry this week. Consider him as a No. 2 RB if you need help at that spot.

James Thrash, WR PHI - Frank Updated 12/21/01

Thrash was not very consistent during the regular season and may not catch a lot of TD passes in the final games of the NFL regular season. He will be a No. 2 wideout at best during the Fantasy playoffs.

David Patten, WR NE - JWillie Updated 12/21/01
Patten's numbers have dropped off in recent weeks. Don't use him unless your team is very thin at wide receiver.

Joey Galloway, WR DAL - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01

Galloway has been a disappointment for Fantasy owners this season. Unless you're in a deeper league, starting Galloway during your playoffs isn't recommended.

Troy Brown, WR NE - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Brown has been an inconsistent Fantasy receiver this year. He may not be a reliable option during the Fantasy playoffs.

Warrick Dunn, RB TB - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Dunn has been inconsistent this season. He will be a No. 2 back at best during your playoffs.

Antowain Smith, RB NE - JWillie Updated 12/21/01
Smith is a must-start player during the Fantasy postseason. Even if his yardage totals aren't good, he is a tremendous TD threat.

Keyshawn Johnson, WR TB - Giggles Updated 12/21/01
Johnson has caught a lot of passes this season, but has only one TD reception. Nevertheless, he will still be a reliable receiver in your playoffs.

Anthony Becht
, TE NYJ - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Becht hasn't been a consistent target for the Jets this year. He may not be very valuable during the Fantasy playoffs.

More Updates

Teams, Rosters

		Bass/Hull
Eric Bass

Player	TM
Pos	Status	Next	Bye	FA

Green, Trent	KC	QB	Active	SD	Week 10	100

Williams, Ricky	NO	RB	Active	@TB	Week 2	100

Davis, Stephen	WAS	RB	Active	CHI	Week 9	100

Brown, Troy	NE	WR	Active	MIA	Week 16	100

Boston, David	ARI	WR	Active	DAL	Week 1	100

Moulds, Eric	BUF	WR	Active	@ATL	Week 5	100

Carney, John	NO	K	Active	@TB	Week 2	100

Buccaneers	TB	DT	Active	NO	Week 2	100

Hasselbeck, Matt	SEA	QB	Reserve	@NYG	Week 6	100

Smith, Emmitt	DAL	RB	Reserve	@ARI	Week 6	100

Jones, Thomas	ARI	RB	Reserve	DAL	Week 1	100

Dyson, Kevin	TEN	WR	Reserve	@OAK	Week 3	100

Ismail, Qadry	BAL	WR	Reserve	CIN	Week 13	100

Wilkins, Jeff	STL	K	Reserve	@CAR	Week 8	100

Total Active Players: 8
Total Reserve Players: 6

NFL Injuries for Bass/Hull

Updated	Player	Team	Pos	Injury
Expected Return

12/21/01	Davis, Stephen	WAS	RB	Knee	Questionable for Sunday's game vs. Chi.

12/21/01	Williams, Ricky	NO	RB	Rib	Listed as probable

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Regarding the proposed language in 2(c), I would recommend that such provision be modified so that if SunTrust is a party to any new credit agreement, the covenants contained therein would govern the swap agreement going forward.  Since chances are good that SunTrust will continue to be a lender, this modification would obviate the need to monitor FGT's compliance with potentially inconsistent terms between the old and new credit agreements.  If SunTrust ceases to be a party to FGT's credit agreement prior to the maturity date of the swap, then the terms and conditions in effect at the time of SunTrust's withdrawal would apply prospectively.

-----Original Message-----
From: Schroeder, Maggie
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Jesse III, John; Shackleton, Sara; Dobin, Nora
Subject: FW: Revised Confirm

John, FYI
Nora, If you could review the other provisions to make sure that they picked up our changes.
Sara, Could you please give a general review?  If you are not the correct party (Jeff Nogid gave me your name), could you give me guidance as to who could assist?

Thanks to everyone.

-----Original Message-----
From: Newby.Steven [mailto:Steven.Newby@SunTrust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Schroeder, Maggie
Cc: Kuykendall.Ken; Avant.Phillip
Subject: Revised Confirm

Maggie -

Attached is another revision of the swap confirm.  Ken wanted to make some
clarifying changes to the copy we sent to you last week.  Sorry for the
confusion and please feel free to give me a call to discuss.  If this is
acceptable let me know and I will send a clean copy.  Thanks.

Steve

*****************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended solely for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of
or taking action in reliance upon this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you have received this email in error
please contact the sender and delete the material
from any computer.
****************************************************************


here is something to be proud of.  i can put this on a resume.  tom, you can
say you lived it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------
To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LSU Is Ranked Party School Champ

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 12:15 PM
---------------------------

Shanna Husser@EES
08/17/2000 12:09 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, ccampbel@tosco.com, jkcarruth@fedex.com, Joey
Esperance/LON/ECT@ECT, JLGaither@equilon.com, BZ202449@msxssc.shell.com,
Michelle LeBlanc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, gary_l@deq.state.la.us, bowmanja@us.ibm.com
cc:
Subject: LSU Is Ranked Party School Champ

---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000 12:06
PM ---------------------------

Staci Roy <staci@mcgarr.com> on 08/17/2000 12:00:49 PM
To: "'Amy Brown'" <whoop_97@hotmail.com>, "'Dave Sheffield (work)'"
<sheffidw@WellsFargo.COM>, "'Shanna Husser'" <shusser@enron.com>, "'Tasha N.
Devall'" <Tasha.Devall@ey.com>, "'Williams, Denise'"
<Denise_Williams@fmi.com>, "Barrow (E-mail)"
<Barrow_Peacock@Mail.BankOne.Com>, "Brett Roy (E-mail)"
<brettr@vistacreek.com>, "Heather Boshears (E-mail)"
<heather.boshears@us.pwcglobal.com>, "Jennifer Bonura (E-mail)"
<jennifer@chescom.net>, "Joe Thomas (E-mail)" <jthomas@mail.smu.edu>,
"Michele Colls (E-mail)" <Michele084@aol.com>, "Mom & Dad Roy (E-mail)"
<kjroy@attglobal.net>, "Robin Hughes (E-mail)" <Mshuggies@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: LSU Is Ranked Party School Champ

LSU Is Ranked Party School Champ
Distinction Disappoints University  Officials
BATON ROUGE, La., Updated 9:13 p.m. CDT August 16, 2000 --It's a  distinction
officials at Louisiana State University wanted to avoid, but now  the word is
out: LSU has been ranked the No. 1 party school in the Princeton  Review of
the nation's top colleges.
Despite seminars on alcohol abuse and  new policies for fraternities and
sororities regarding alcohol consumption,  LSU edged out the University of
Alabama for the top spot. The University of  Texas "won" third place.
Chancellor Mark Emmert said LSU is no more a party  school than any other
university.
The Princeton ranking was disheartening  news to university officials still
shaken after the Aug. 19, 1997, death of  an LSU student who drank
excessively during a celebration of his acceptance  into a fraternity.
Brigham Young University was dubbed the top "Stone Cold  Sober" school in the
review.

The top 20 "Party Schools," according to the Princeton Review:
1.  Louisiana State University
2. University of Alabama
3. University of  Texas
4. Florida State University
5. University of Colorado
6.  University of Tennessee
7. University of California at Santa Cruz
8.  Tulane University
9. University of Wisconsin
10. Ohio University,  Athens
11. University of New Hampshire
12. University of Michigan
13.  University of Vermont
14. Ohio State University
15. New York  University
16. Lehigh University
17. Southern Methodist University
18.  University of Florida
19. University of California at Santa Barbara
20.  Union College
The top 20 "Stone Cold Sober Schools," according to the Princeton  Review:
1. Brigham Young University
2. Wheaton College
3. California  Institute of Technology
4. U.S. Naval Academy
5. U.S. Coast Guard  Academy
6. Samford University
7. Cooper Union
8. Wellesley  College
9. Mount Holyoke College
10. Calvin College
11. Haverford  College
12. Golden Gate University
13. U.S. Air Force Academy
14.  College of the Ozarks
15. Grove City College
16. Wells College
17.  Simmons College
18. Illinois Institute of Technology
19. Colorado School  of Mines
20. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology


Ollie,

Congrats on hooking up with a little long-term action.  Always thought you'd be one of the first to go.  Send her down south to Portland if it looks like she's getting board with your "itsy bitsy".

I've kept in touch with Carl and Brett but not much else.  Funny how time can just slip by.  I think back to the days in school and yup...just like I thought, everything seems so cool.  I think of how nice it would be to have scores of friends within a block and three bars to choose from... but it didn't seem that super at the time.  I specifically remember getting pissed on a Tuesday night, playing darts at Shakers with throngs of 20 something girls around and shrugging it off as "boring".

You may be suprised to hear it, but I am still on with Enron and looking forward to a buyout in a week or so.  As strange as it may seem, this whole fiscad may have been a huge blessing in disguise...I'll just keep my fingers crossed.

I'm doing a lot of skiing this year.  Let me know when and where we should meet up.  I'd like to see the likes of Toby, Ty, Nate, Ken and even Palmy.

"got fuel to burn, got roads to ride" -Neil Young

Deano
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dean, Craig" <Craig.Dean@ENRON.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 05:46:59 -0800
To:  <cdean12@earthlink.net>
Subject: FW: You still suck at baseball....

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Smith [mailto:olivermsmith@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:30 PM
> To: Dean, Craig
> Subject: You still suck at baseball....
>
>
> CRAIG!
> What the hell have you been up to?  I just got your email address from
> Carl.
>   I havent talked to him in about 2 years either.  Last year I tried
> everything to get your address so you could come to my wedding.  I got
> married last July.  My wife, Jennifer, is just finishing up at the U, so
> she
> is a little younger than us, but she's really cute, intelligent, blah,
> blah....  Anyway, are you still in Portland?  I heard you were working
> at
> Enron, but apparantly they do not know that since I tried calling
> several
> times and they had no idea who the fuck I was talking about.  Man, Enron
> has
> had a tough time.  Amazing considering the talent that works at that
> company...not being sarcastic.  You should do the prudent thing and
> become a
> teacher/baseball coach like me...no stress, summers off, and job
> security.
> Plus, the pay is not as bad as it's made out to be...considering you get
> a
> pension when you retire.  I love it.  Anyway, I don't feel like typing
> anymore, so either give me a call, or I can give you a call if you send
> your
> number.  I'd love to catch up.  My cell:  206-293-1459.  Call after 2:30
>
> (yes, that is the end of my work day)  Hope to hear from you soon.
>
> Ollie
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>

--


Donald and Lisa will not be skiing this weekend, please call them if you have
questions on schedules.

Donald is all NW points and COB,

Lisa is all SW points and PV.

Thanks,

c


Charlie,
Your self evaluation was solid.  The only suggestion I have is for you to add a few specific examples (details) of the things that you are most proud of or that you (as an Associate) think are noteworthy.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Ed


Jim,

Can we meet on Friday to discuss this topic.
The person who supports power, Grant Masson,
will be out for the next two days.

Vince


The problem is in getting the original in their hands (where?) by tomorrow.
Does it have to be an original?

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 11:04:21 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Delta Documents

Kay:

Can we at least get the membership certificates signed by Tuesday?  This
seems to be the only document required in advance of closing.  If we can't
get the 80% membership interest certificate in the lender's possession on
the closing date, then there is a lien perfection issue for them to deal
with, and I thought we could accommodate their request and avoid the problem
altogether.  Please advise, as Greg and Isabel will be calling within an
hour or so to finalize the mechanics on this.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: Re: Delta Documents

I've asked GE for the LOC by Wednesday, but I haven't gotten a response.

I'll have difficulty getting executed docs by Tuesday, since sigs are
coming from Portland.  I'll have to check to see what can be done.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 10:02:44 AM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Delta Documents

Kay:

Can you get executed documents back to me on Tuesday?  Greg has requested
that we send the original membership certificate representing the 80%
interest to the collateral agent Tuesday night by overnight delivery to
hold
in escrow until closing, in order that the collateral agent is in
possession
of the certificate (for purposes of legal opinions) upon closing on
Wednesday.  Greg is planning to fax signature pages of all of their closing
documents later today.  (I will be out of the office at a meeting with
another client most of the afternoon today).

There is one last question with GE dealing with the letter of credit for
the
retention amount, as this affects our disbursement instruction letter.  I
advised Greg that GE's normal practice was to send the retention L/C after
receipt of payment.  He is considering this, but may want to talk to GE
about the ability to present the L/C at closing.  Do you have any thoughts
on this?

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Friday , August 4,2000

Interview begins at  9:00 a.m.

9:00 a.m. Vince Kaminski - EB1962

10:00 a.m. John Lavarato - No Interview

11:15 a.m. Mike Roberts / Jose Marquez
                           (Luncheon Interview)
3:00 p.m.  Hunter Shively - EB32C2

3: 15 p.m. Jeff Shankman - EB32C2

3:30 p.m. John Arnold - EB32C2

3:45 p.m. Toni Graham-

Itinerary and Resume will follow ......

                       Thanks
                 Kevin Moore
Please note: DO NOT OFFER  Mr. Bennett a position without JOHN LAVARATO
APPROVAL