Here are this week's survey results.

AVG            +108
AVG w/o High & Low  +107
Median              +108
Standard Deviation    9
# of Responses        57
High           +130
Low            +89
Last Year           +46

Thank You!

George Ellis
BNP PARIBAS

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


here you go,

tell me what you think.

i spent a lot of time on this


Please cancel Greg Whalley for the Exec. Impact & Influence Seminar for
November 6 & 7.

Liz Taylor
x31935

Enron-admin@FSDDataSvc.com on 10/16/2000 08:32:27 AM
To: gwhalle@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey

***REMINDER***

We have not yet received your feedback.  Your input is
very valuable and to be included in the participant's
summary report, it must be received NO LATER THAN CLOSE
OF BUSINESS on Wednesday, October 25.  Without your
feedback, the participant may not receive a summary
report or be eligible to attend the program.

___________________________________________
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Lawrence Whalley,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Wednesday, October 25.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

EFXXCU    (Lawrence Whalley)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith
at Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: James S. Prentice
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: expjsp05
Report Total: $645.43
Amount Due Employee: $645.43

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Alan,

The Board has now adjourned to Executive Session (2:55 PM) with NO public discussion about Enron and our Scheduling Coordinator status (althought there was some brief reference to SCE not going into bankruptcy but there may be other participants they need to deal with - comment made during the budget discussion).  Below are some of the issues that may be of interest:

Information Policy.  They are trying to "Streamline" dissemination of information to Federal and State agencies.  They are going to be trying to change the tariff language to create a "Safe harbor" for entities like FERC and EOB (or whatever State agency has current oversight authority of the ISO)  What this safe harbor does is, assuming all parties have signed an appropriate confidentiality agreement with the ISO, when the EOB requests "confidential" information the ISO would deliver this information ASAP - there would be a 5 day delay before the government agency could release this "confidential" information to the public, during which time the market participant(s) involved could petition to stop public disclosure of this information (it seems to set backwards the process today, where they have to subpoena us for the data)  The other catch here is, if the EOB gets the data, and ANY other government agency asks the EOB for the information, assuming the confidentiality agreements have been signed, allow for the EOB to pass this data on to the requestor.  I believe the 5-day restriction on that entity then starts.  No matter what, this policy would seem problematic - to date I don't believe there is any state agency which has proved to be particularly trustworthy when it comes to keeping information confidential.

Congestion Management - Mr. Kristov has outlined several steps to a new congestion management mechanism.  There are 3 phases to this proposal, interim with the ISO imposing limits on scheduling by generators and bids (no more negative dec bids), Develop a mechanism for the Day Ahead and Hour Ahead process (which was not described - apparently it is still in the formative stages) and finally develop and implement protocols and software which can deal with congestion in Real-Time.  Mr. K points to the addition of new Gen to the ISO system which is causing much of this new congestion and the negative dec bids.  They will be filing this plan with the FERC soon.

FTR Auction - the presentation was just to show how FTRs are derived and to get a "rubber-stamp" approval to hold the auction in April.  Well, it didn't seem to work out that way.  Apparently Mr. Florio doesn't like the FTR market, there is concern that the ISO will not get the "right market value" for the FTRs and there was concern about congestion payments.  The Board voted to "move" this item and leave it open for further review prior to the next Board meeting, where they may vote to ask FERC to allow them to suspend or reduce the term of the auctioned FTRs.  We need to watch this for further developments.

CERS Relationship - Ziad Alaywan outlined the current and pending changes made as a result of FERC action on 11/20.  Transition:  As of 11/13 CERS has not been getting proprietary views of the BEEP stack.  As of 11/16 CERS is no longer being supplied with previews of the D/A and H/A scheduling results and by 11/30 at 2359, CERS - CAISO will no longer be providing any remaining D/A, H/A and R/T information and presumably by 12/6 CERS payments will be made and will halt all OOM calls to CERS and the ISO will resume only making OOM calls to all participants when necessary as per their Tariff.  You can expect a market notice to this effect sometime tomorrow.

That's it!

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Blair, Kit; Dasovich, Jeff; Hall, Steve
Subject:	RE: CAISO Board Meeting

Listening now.  I will keep an ear open for the ESP issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Mara, Susan; Perrino, Dave
Cc:	Blair, Kit; Dasovich, Jeff; Hall, Steve
Subject:	CAISO Board Meeting

Is going on as we speak.  Sue or Dave: can you listen in?

Board of Governors
Location: California ISO; 877-381-5998 Passcode: ISO


Should this go into Janine's efforts on Markets?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Montovano, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Massachusetts

Jim - here is Frank's take on summit in Mass.  Looks like we will have opportunity for change in Mass. I iwll be putting together a more comprehensive plan shortly. SM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rishe, Frank
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Montovano, Steve
Subject:	Massachusetts

Steve -

See attached  article.  The Energy Summit turned out to be quite worthwhile and well timed, as I was able to get a better perspective of what opportunities we may have to make changes next year.  Also, had a chance to chat briefly with Chairman Connelly, Commissioner Vasington and Commissioner Keating, and others. The most telling part of the article is the last paragraph where Speaker Finneran says, "We'll be doing some adjustments" in legislation next year, "Some of them may be vary large adjustments, but they will be adjustments. We're trying to formulate the phase of deregulation, an enhanced deregulation, if you will."  My sense is that competitive Default service may be a possibility, supplier consolidated billing may also require a change to the legislation. Clearly, it is a time to try to hone in on what EES and ENA's wish list is for Mass

I met with DeTore Thursday night as well, and would like to reschedule a meeting with you and him within the next couple of weeks if possible.

Let's discuss.

Frank

 << File: Article on MA Energy Summit.doc >>


Gaylord Container is shut down by Credit, but it should be open, so it is
going to come back thru as an amended counterparty.


To All:

I have attached an omnibus confirm worksheet for a transaction with this
counterparty.  We require a guaranty from their parent.  We recently
transacted with this counterparty at which time we required the same
collateral (Marie Heard worked on this).  They failed to provide the guaranty
and unwound the positions.  Now they say they will provide the guaranty. At
the time of the initial transaction they sent over thier format which Shari
Stack reviewed and commented, which I have a copy of.  I feel we should
attach a red-line version of this guaranty to the confirm for their review.

Please advise,

Russell.


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 03:51 PM -----

	Jeremy.Pitts@BAKERNET.com
	06/15/2000 10:30 AM

		 To: John.Viverito@enron.com
		 cc: Shinji.Toyohara@BAKERNET.com, Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com,
Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com, James.Plaisted@BAKERNET.com,
Anne.Hung@BAKERNET.com, Edwin.T.Whatley@BAKERNET.com, Susan.Musch@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Financial Trading

John - Our memorandum is attached.  Please let me know if you have any
questions
or comments.

Best regards

Jeremy Pitts

Registered Foreign Lawyer - Jurisdiction of Primary Qualification - New South
Wales
Designated Jurisdictions - England and Wales and the State of Victoria
Direct Tel:  (81-3) 3479 3839
Direct Fax:  (81-3) 3479 0225
Voice/Fax Messaging: (81-3) 4464 6094

This is an e-mail from Baker & McKenzie - Tokyo Aoyama Law Office (Qualified
Joint Enterprise Offices).

The contents of this e-mail may be privileged and confidential and are
intended
only for the use of the addressee. No one else may copy, forward, disclose or
use all or any of it in any form. If you are not an intended recipient, please
notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your
system.
Thank you.

 <<Memo E 6.14.00-1.doc>>

 - Memo E 6.14.00-1.doc


Melissa:  I am waiting for a "package" from Kim Hundle of all power financial templates for a complete review.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Hundl, Kimberly; Aucoin, Evelyn
Subject:	Payment Language on Financial Power Confirms

Sara,

It has been brought to my attention that the payment language we are using for financial power trades that are less than one month in duration does not mention that payment is due 5 business days after the floating price is determinable.  It basically says 5 business days after the last day of the month.

The fifth (5th) Business Day following the date on which the Floating Price is determinable (this language is in all confirms with a calculation period of one month or longer).

The fifth (5th) Business Day following the last day of the month that includes the Calculation Period (this language is in all confirms with a calculation period less than one month).

Can you draft payment language for trades less than one month that states payment is due five business days after the floating price is determinable?

Call me if you would like to discuss.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


Dear classmates,

My wife, Eve, is co-chairing this year's Oakland
Ballet Gala, which will be held at the newly renovated
Rotunda Building in Oakland on May 5.  She would like
to know if any of my classmates would be interested in
attending this year's Gala.  She has promised me that
it will be THE event of the year!  If you are
interested, please e-mail me your address and she will
put you on the invitation list.  If you have any
questions, please feel free to call her (510-627-1635)
or e-mail her (egrossma@portoakland.com) at her
office.

Hope you have a great semester!

Pat Bukowski

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Cooper Richey/CAL/ECT on 05/03/2001 12:10 PM ---------------------------
To:	Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_In_ECT_Toronto, Everyone_in_ECT_Montreal
cc:
Subject:	Employee News!

	Please welcome the new faces at Enron........

Tyler Seminuk became a full-time employee on May 1st in the Power Trading group reporting to John Zufferli. Congratulations Tyler!

Stephane Brodeur has moved back (again) from Toronto on May 1st!  Stephane has resumed his place in Trading reporting (again  :-) to Jon McKay.   Please welcome Stephane back - before he transfers again.

Brad Merchant and Robert Schorn started May 1st as Power Settlement Co-op Students reporting to Mark Dupuy. Welcome Brad and Robert.

Cindy Tu started May 1st as an Administrative Assistant II in Toronto reporting to Scotty Gilbert.  Please welcome Cindy.

Marnie Rojo started May 1st in Toronto in a Staff position reporting to Scotty Gilbert.  Welcome Marnie!

Scott Campbell starts with EES Canada in the Calgary office on May 7th reporting to Rob Milnthorp.   Welcome Scott!

Paul Dunsmore starts on May 14th as an Analyst and he's one of our "Super Saturday" recruits starting this year. Please welcome Paul!

Coreen Herring is starting on May 14th in a Staff, Logistics position reporting to Kevin Heal.  Welcome Coreen!

(Mr.) Carey Bingham starts on May 14th reporting to Richard McKeel as a Specialist, IT Development.  Welcome Carey!

Fino Tiberi starts on May 15th as a Manager, Gov't Affairs in Calgary reporting to Aleck Dadson.  Please welcome Fino!

Farewell.....

Jai Hawker resigned his position in Trading on April 19th to pursue a career in Professional Golfing.  Good Luck Jai!

Brian Kristjansen has resigned from Risk and will be leaving us on May 4th.   Best Wishes Brian!


yes


What is the status re signature of the GTC for Weirton?  This needs to be
signed as soon as possible,  as I understand  gas is flowing?

Please advise.

Many thanks !

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


don't forget you owe me dinner...


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/20/2000 10:54 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	10/20/2000 10:34 AM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Doug
Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Duane Nelsen" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Ed Maddox"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Frank
Misseldine" <fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>,
"Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Joe
Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jonathan
Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Ken Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Milton Schultz"
<bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Pete Levitt"
<Pete@calwind.com>, "Robert Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Steve
Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Ted Cortopassi"
<TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "Tom Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Tony
Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Ward Scobee"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
"Trond Aschehoug" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Susan J Mara"
<Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Scott Noll" <snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Lynn
Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank
DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Fw: FERC & California markets

FYI>

----- Original Message -----
From: andy brown
To: smutny@iepa.com ; steven@iepa.com ; kaplan@iepa.com ; dkk ; runwithmee ;
Andy Brown ; Eric Janssen ; cte ; Gregory Maxim ; lmh@eslawfirm.com ;
jdh@eslawfirm.com
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 7:53 AM
Subject: FERC & California markets

Article noting that FERC will have special meeting on Nov 1 re California
markets, also Article that Terry Winter is having a press conference today
(Friday) about how the market will be fixed:
FERC To Meet Nov 9 To Propose Remedies To Calif
                    Pwr Mkt
                    Friday, October 20, 2000 08:17 AM

                    LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--In an unusual move, the Federal
Energy Regulatory                     Commission said Thursday it will meet
Nov. 1 to discuss remedies to California's                     troubled
wholesale power market.
                    Details of a probe into California's wholesale
electricity market will also be released at                     the Nov. 1
meeting. As reported, state and federal regulators launched the probe over
                 the summer, saying the market wasn't workably competitive.
                    FERC also said it expects to hold a public hearing Nov. 9
to discuss possible                     solutions to California's power
crisis.
                    The place and time of both meetings haven't been decided
yet.
                    Regarding Thursday's announcement, FERC Commissioner Curt
Hebert said "rather                     than waiting for Nov. 1 to release
the findings of our staff's investigation, I urge the
chairman to release the completed report now...it can only help heal the raw
emotions                     rampant in the state of California."
                    FERC said it was rare that it would announce details of
its procedures. The                     commission said its own rules don't
allow it to normally announce its procedures.
                    "Because of the need for expeditious action to address
the serious issues affecting                     California electric power
markets and California consumers...the commission is taking
  the unusual step of announcing in advance the procedures it expects to
follow over the                     coming weeks to move forward in these
proceedings," the FERC order said.
                    The commission said it will give a three-week deadline
for parties to intervene and to                     comment on the possible
solutions presented by the commission.
                    FERC said it anticipates issuing an order by the end of
the year "adopting and                     directing remedies to promptly
address to the extent possible the identified problems
adversely affecting competitive power markets in California."
                    If necessary, FERC said it would hold additional meetings
to develop solutions "to                     other identified problems."
                    California's wholesale power prices soared this past
summer. Customers of San                     Diego Gas & Electric Co., a unit
of Sempra Energy Corp. (SRE, news, msgs), paid
market-based rates for power, which resulted in triple-digit utility bills
for its customers.                     The state's three investor-owned
utilities also racked up billions of dollars in debt due
to high wholesale costs.
                    SDG&E customers are currently paying a fixed rate for
their power, while customers of                     the state's other two
utilities are still bound by a rate-freeze.
                    Generators have been accused of gouging customers and
manipulating the market,                     although no evidence has been
offered up yet. However, the FERC investigation may
address that.
                    -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
                    jason.leopold@dowjones.com
Cal-ISO CEO To Announce Remedy To Lower Power
                    Cost
                    Friday, October 20, 2000 08:16 AM
                    (This article was originally published Thursday)
                    LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California Independent System
Operator Chairman and                     Chief Executive Terry Winter will
hold a news conference Friday morning to announce                     a
possible solution to reduce the state's electricity costs.
                    An ISO spokesman wouldn't comment on the details of the
news conference.
                    According to a news release, Winter will speak about
"potential vehicles for containing                     costs, while
maintaining the ISO's high standards of reliability."
                    The ISO controls about 75% of California's power grid and
real-time market. As                     already reported, the grid operator
has come under fire this summer for failing to
immediately reduce a price cap in its real-time market.
                    Currently, state Sen. Steve Peace, D-Chula Vista, is
drafting legislation to merge the                     ISO and the state's
Power Exchange.
                    -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
                    jason.leopold@dowjones.com
                    Quote for referenced ticker symbols: EIX, PCG, SRE
                    , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Here is another presentation, like the other one I sent to you last week.  We
only need 6 copies of this one in color in a spiral binder.  Please give me a
call if you have any questions.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998


Metin,

Great to hear from you.  Believe it or not, my brother lives in Istanbul and
my son Jeffrey and I are going to visit him this summer - somewhere in the
June 23 to June 28 timeframe.  I'd love to see you if it's possible.  I'll
let you know when my plans are firm.

Jeff


Dave would like to schedule a meeting the you today to discuss HPL......
Would 4:00 pm be ok with all of you....???  please let me know your
availability as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Kay


Robin Lorentzen
14250 Chicken Dinner Road
Caldwell, ID 83607-9326
rlorentzen@albertson.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Robin Lorentzen


Jim:
Here is the latest version of the contact list.  Please send back to me your
comments and/or changes to the list.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 89007 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Hi,
?
How is the family???? and the multiple jobs??????
?
We just got back from Omaha --- Linda's 40th High School  reunion. I wish
someone would explain to me who all those old people were that  attended.
?
Putting $1.85 a gallon gas in that beast of hers was sure fun.  I may need a
part-time job if this keeps up long. (Just kidding -- you probably  have
enough to deal with -- right)
?
Jennifer has decided to journey off to Law school at Baylor.  She and Linda
are going to Waco Friday to finalize an apartment.
Chris is managing the I-10 Texas Land & Cattle store.  Keeps him very busy.
(can't even send an e-mail ----- like someone else I know)  (Just kidding)
?
We are looking for property on a lake (Linda's request). Like  there is
anything like that left in Texas. We will probably drop in this  house.
?
Pretty quiet here all things considered.
?
Drop me a line or give me a call when you have some time. Or  if you are
really free we could actually plan a lunch. The price of natural gas  should
help keep Tom from hassling you too much.
?
Ken


Jennifer,
After the Universal-Enron conference call with Elyse Kalmans and Misha
Siegel, we discovered the following:

The majority of the JPI is for-profit and therefore Community Relations
cannot be a sponsoring party.
Elyse recommended I contact Mark Palmer to discuss the sponsorship and the
value tied to EMS, Weather, Plastics & Credit.
Universal was hesitant to comment on dollar amounts for the sponsorship but
noted $250K would be the lowest amount for the JPI Virtual Institute.

I wanted to consult your advice as to what tactics would be best at this
point.  Is Mark Palmer definitely the correct contact?  Would you prefer to
contact him on this front?

Thanks.
Colleen


We have length on peak Monday, 04-23 in NP-15.  The energy is in PGE3, 25 mws
are under ST-WBOM and 56 mws are in ST-CALI.  We need to sell all 81 mws.  In
Enpower we buy the 25 mws from imbalance under ST-WBOM, and sell them under
ST-WBOM.  ST-WBOM is long at $230.  We buy the 56 mws under the ST-CALI book
and then sell it off for a profit split under the ST-CALI book.  I will be in
Seattle this weekend.  If you have any questions, you can reach me on my cell
phone.

Thanks,
Bill


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron on 12/12/2000
01:21 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sharon Solon                           12/12/2000 12:53 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie
McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Deb
Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ETS MONDAY MORNING STAFF MEETINGS

FYI...Here is Julie's answer when I asked about weekly reports.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron on 12/12/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

Julie Armstrong
12/12/2000 11:53 AM
To: Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ETS MONDAY MORNING STAFF MEETINGS

Sharon:
Since the meetings are canceled till January 2nd, reports are not required.
However, if those individuals are in the office and want to update their
respective areas during the holidays, that would be great.  Thanks.

	From:  Sharon Solon                           12/12/2000 11:48 AM

To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS MONDAY MORNING STAFF MEETINGS

Due to the schedule below, what will be the weekly report schedule?  No
reports on December 22 but have reports on the December 29th for January 2
meeting?
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron on 12/12/2000
11:44 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
12/11/2000 01:03 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
jerry.d.martin@enron.com, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/NPNG/Enron@Enron, Ruth Mann/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Houser/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Amelia
Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne
Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki
Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tammy
Kovalcik/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melinda
Gallishaw/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kim Ladish/OTS/Enron@Enron, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, alexander.betty@enron.com, Amelia
Williams/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS MONDAY MORNING STAFF MEETINGS

This is to advise you that we will NOT have ETS Monday morning staff meetings
on December 18 or December 25.

Please make note that the next ETS Staff Meeting will be held on Tuesday,
January 2, 2001 at 9:30AM in 49C2.   And then on January 8, we'll resume our
regular schedule of having our staff meetings on Monday mornings at 9:15AM.

Regards and Happy Holidays,
Cindy
X36197


Here are the Gas Daily prices for Sonat on the days of allocated flow:

10/12 --  101 mmbtu @ $5.135
10/20 --    62 mmbtu @ $5.02
10/24 --    63 mmbtu @ $4.81
10/25 --    52 mmbtu @ $4.835
10/26 --  377 mmbtu @ $4.64
10/27 --  371 mmbtu @ $4.60
10/28 --  538 mmbtu @ $4.475
10/29 --    84 mmbtu @ $4.475

Let me know if you need any more info.

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 11/06/2000 08:18:31 AM
To: "Susan W Pereira" <Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com>
cc: Dan_Cole@eott.com
Subject: Gas Daily Prices for Bazor Ridge

Susan,

There was a small amount of gas sold from the Kahuna Gas plant in October.
I have spoken with Joe Casa with Enron and he is going to provide volumes.
Can you please provide me the October pricing or give me the name of
someone who can?

Thanks,

Stevens


TO: Mark E. Haedicke
RE: Take TheLaw.net Challenge!
FROM: Mark Whitney, CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net  REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

If you are a savvy legal compusearcher you will not want to miss this
opportunity to take the TheLaw.net Challenge, below. On the other hand, if
you ever feel challenged when it comes to computer research, stay with us. We
can help.

Before you begin, forget that TheLaw.net's searchable cases overlap West and
Lexis' to the tune of more than four million entries across more than 175
Federal and state appellate jurisdictions. Just put it out of your mind.

Forget that it is very easy, using our software, to quickly learn for
yourself how courts have treated the particular cite, statute, rule or
regulation you are interested in learning more about. Forget that it is easy
for you to quickly pop up cases when all you have is a cite, party name,
author, counsel, court, and so forth.

Forget that one of the major differences between TheLaw.net and The Two
Headed Monster, is that everyone gets all of our highly usable, authoritative
data with a national scope, all for a low flat rate. Finally, forget (if you
can) that TheLaw.net delivers all of this and much, much more, on an
unlimited use basis, directly to your desktop under the following terms and
conditions:

--$345 annually for you; regularly $395 (Save $50 until April 30)
--$575 for you and a partner, annual unlimited use rate (Small Office Special)
--$1195 for you and four others, annual unlimited use rate (Workgroup Edition)
--April Enterprise Specials:
----$1895 for 10 annual, unlimited use rate (April Special)
----$3995 for 25 annual, unlimited use rate (April Special)
----$7995 for 50 annual unlimited use rate (April Special)
--pay only for active users
--paralegals, librarians and backoffice staff are on us
--conduct real legal research with a seamless national scope
--all subscribers install at work, at home and on their laptops
--no passwords or user names
--unlimited tech and reference attorney aftercare
--no CDs to chase around the office
--all you can eat - no surprises - no gamesmanship
--30 day unconditional money back guarantee
--to subscribe, go to our homepage and click "SIGN ME UP":
http://www.thelaw.net

We recognize that West and Lexis are King when it comes to enhancing public
records and churning them in their searchable databases. But, for all of
these highfalutin enhancements, one rarely hears the word value uttered in
the same sentence with the names of either of these two companies.

Which leads to some questions that you ought to be asking:

Q: How much are all of these enhancements worth to you?
Q: Are these enhancements timesaving or frustrating?
Q: Does it make sense to continue with onerous annual contracts?
Q: Can the list of expensive items be shortened with low, flat-rate options?
Q: Rather than switching, should you simply redefine relationships with
existing vendors in light of less expensive, authoritative options?
Q: How can you ever expect to fully leverage publicly available web based
documents and databases on behalf of the enterprise in the absence of a set
of standards, processes and best practices for doing so?

The answer to the last question is to have a one-stop front-end to that
subset of the more than two billion pages online that belong a click or two
away on your desktop. That's where we come in. Proprietary searchable case
law aside, TheLaw.net, not West or Lexis, is King when it comes to getting
you around online.

--WEB BASED PRIMARY AUTHORITY JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER

There is no longer a debate about whether publicly available web based
documents and databases will continue to loom large in the practice of law.
That debate was completely foreclosed when West recently bought FindLaw for a
reported $37M and Lexis poured a bunch of money into a portal called
lexisONE. Both companies are now attempting to brand these free sites as the
best place to begin when you want to find authoritative information on the
public web.

Are these web sites the best place for seasoned professionals to begin? As an
attorney, you are, per se, a sophisticated consumer of information.
Accordingly, we invite you to take TheLaw.net Challenge and decide for
yourself.

--HERE IS YOUR ASSIGNMENT SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO ACCEPT IT

Using lexisONE, find Chapter 60 (Tax) of the Consolidated Laws of New York.
Do you have a stopwatch or timer ready? Good. By the way, lexisONE is located
at: http://www.lexisone.com. Before starting, read on for a heads up on a
couple of key factors relevant to your assignment.

Starting at lexisONE should give you a big advantage. Why? Well, to begin
with, this is Lexis we're talking about; the same company that just took out
a full page ad in the current edition of Law Office Computing which claims,
in relevant part, that if "you're a solo or small-firm attorney, the LexisONE
service has everything you need to practice more effectively, run your office
more efficiently, and keep up with the latest legal tools and trends."

So are you ready? Are you excited? You should be, because you are about to
discover just how effective and efficient you can be using lexisONE since,
after all, they have "everything you need".

Oh yes. One more datapoint before you begin. If you are lucky enough to
eventually locate the link to the Consolidated Laws of New York that lexisONE
provides, be forewarned that this link has been DYSFUNCTIONAL for at least
the past two weeks.

Why? Well, for one thing, the State of New York upgraded its massive web site
on, or about, March 23, 2001. Since then, this portion of lexisONE's site has
suffered from a nasty case of LINKROT. Translation: lexisONE is not current
or complete as to some critical primary authority.

At some point the people at lexisONE obviously determined that the
Consolidated Laws of New York were indeed among the items needed to "practice
more effectively". Today it is hard to know what they think.

--WE PROMISED YOU A CHALLENGE

Are you skilled enough to PRETEND that the link is working while trying to
find it anyway? This way you can still get a feel for the effectiveness and
efficiency you would have experienced using lexisONE had the link been
working. Incidentally, if using lexisONE, you can find this link in less than
two minutes, you are a God to us! Really.

Now snap back to reality and consider that when you have a subscription to
TheLaw.net you can view the specific page containing Chapter 60 of the
Consolidated Laws in six or seven seconds by simply sliding through our
smooth hierarchy of pre-configured Federal and State Statutes Menu. Once you
locate the law you want to know more about, you can enter the statutory cite
into our case law search engine, check New York from among the 175+ Federal
and state appellate jurisdictions at your fingertips and quickly pop up a
list of relevant cases that have construed the item you need to know more
about.

--THELAW.NET IS A BETTER MOUSETRAP. PERIOD.

Free web site portals are fine for law students or an occasional reference
when you are not under the gun. But, unless you have complete disregard for
your time and your clients' best interests, if you are browsing the public
web for purposes of serious research, you should have the right tool for the
job. Only then will you be as "efficient" and "effective" as possible. The
last thing you need is another ill-considered free web site.

--REMEMBER THAT CASE LAW WE TOLD YOU TO FORGET?

You can stop forgetting now and consider that subscribers to TheLaw.net
Professional Legal Browser not only get all of that great case law with a
national scope, but they receive slick, pre-configured menu-driven access to
more than 50,000 web based documents and databases including Federal and
state statutes, rules, forms, regulations, executive agency databases,
legislative tracking tools, every major metropolitan newspaper, local rules
and forms, pattern jury instructions, court calendars and contact
information, expedited pathfinders to most Federal dockets, executive agency
databases, columnists, real-time national news and wire services, corporate
backgrounders, polls, searchable dictionaries, encyclopedias, calculators,
selected law journals and law reviews, nearly 10,000 helpers arranged across
dozens of practice areas, and much, much more.

If lexisONE "has everything you need" how can it be that we have 30,000 more
deep-links to web based documents and databases and 35,000 more than FindLaw?
Hmmm.

--THELAW.NET: THE SUM OF THE ALTERNATIVES

Within one business day of New York upgrading their web site, subscribers to
TheLaw.net were informed via a free special email alert that we had updated
their software and that the new homepage for the Consolidated Laws is right
here:
http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=0

As of this writing (Sunday, April 8, 2001) LexisONE is still linked to the
old outmoded location: http://assembly.state.ny.us/cgi-bin/claws

Once this message gets passed around the Net someone at Lexis will see it and
fix the broken link. We are happy to help out, because even when the New York
Consolidated and Unconsolidated Law links are finally functional, LexisONE
still merely provides the following:

--one link to New York Consolidated Laws Homepage
--one link to New York Unconsolidated Laws Homepage
--one link to the New York Constitution Homepage

--Cf. THELAW.NET PROFESSIONAL BROWSER:

--Linking by Constitutional Article, we provide 22 hand-titled links to the
New York Constitution.
--Linking by Statutory Subject Matter we provide 96 hand-titled links to the
New York Consolidated Laws, plus one link to the Consolidated Laws Homepage
and one link to the Consolidated Laws Index for a total of 98 links.
--Linking by Statutory Subject Matter we provide 25 hand-titled links to the
New York Unconsolidated Laws, plus one link to the Unconsolidated Laws
Homepage for a total of 26 links.
--We provide an additional separate link to the search interface for these
laws.
--In total, TheLaw.net provides 147 hand-titled, deep-links just to this
discrete subset of New York primary authority.
--LexisONE provides three links and two of them are broken.

TheLaw.net literally removes more than 90% of the time wasted online. If you
begin with lexisONE or FindLaw, you need to add an additional layer of effort
to get to specific statutory subject areas of the Consolidated Laws that we
completely eliminate with our detailed deep-links.

--ON THE OTHER HAND, LEXISONE MAY BE "GOOD ENOUGH"

Surely, lexisONE must have some replicable process in place for maintaining
their links. But if statutes from a major metropolitan state can disappear
from the radar, what happens when you have a really important issue to
research, such as: "Do Trendy Clothes Catch Trendy Clients?" We are not
lying. See for yourself. (This link works.)
http://www.lexisone.com/lifestyle/style/040101b.html

It could be that our standards are unreasonably high. Maybe we should take
our lead from Lexis-Nexis Chief Technology Officer Allan McLaughlin who made
the following lexisONE observation in the recent article "Lexis-Nexis and
West Battle Online", published by The American Lawyer and law.com: "It's not
our best product," confides McLaughlin, "but for a lot of lawyers, it's good
enough.'"

Good enough? Hopefully you are not one of the THOSE lawyers.

Given the inclusion, in our tool, of searchable proprietary case law, we have
tried to clarify some of the differences between a marginally maintained free
directory and a true best practices software solution. We thank you for
taking TheLaw.net Challenge.

--YOU ARE NOW CORDIALLY INVITED TO VISIT OUR WEB SITE

Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Check our TOP 25 FAQs: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs.htm
Check our References: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm
View Sample Tutorials: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm
Our prices are always at: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
Sign up online at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm
Call toll free with any questions and we'll book a subscription for you:
1.877.4.LAWNET [877.452.9638]

--CONSIDER OUR VISION: A FIRM FOUNDATION AT A LOW FLAT-RATE

TheLaw.net, privately held and successful from Day One, represents the next
logical step; a big improvement over slogging through two billion web pages
and otherwise watching legal research costs spiral out of control at a time
when with normal free market principles at work, such costs would be
plummeting.

Imagine. No surprises. No meters. No printing, downloading, pay-per-view or
on-demand fees. In short, none of the gamesmanship you have come to expect
and never appreciated.

At your option, we can build your packages and deliver them today via our web
site or we can ship CDs via U.S. Priority Mail or FedEx. We thank you for
your time and we hope to hear from you soon while the April savings last!

Regards,

MARK WHITNEY
CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
Chicago - San Diego, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)

******************************************

CASES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE AND YEAR OF ORIGIN
-----Sorted in Order of Federal Circuit
---------See also, http://www.thelaw.net/compare.htm

--United States Supreme Court 1900
--Federal Circuit 1982
--U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit 1950

FIRST FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 1930
--Maine Supreme Judicial Court 1996
--Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1930
--Massachusetts Appeals Court 1930
--New Hampshire Supreme Court 1930
--Rhode Island Supreme Court 1950

SECOND FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 1930
--Connecticut Supreme Court 1950
--Connecticut Appellate Court 1950
--New York Court of Appeals 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 2nd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 3rd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 4th Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 2nd Dept. 1955
--Vermont Supreme Court 1930

THIRD FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, New Jersey 1999
--New Jersey Supreme Court 1930
--New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Eastern, Pennsylvania 1997
--Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Superior Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 1950

FOURTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, Maryland 1999
--Maryland Court of Appeals 1950
--Maryland Special Court of Appeals 1950
--North Carolina Supreme Court 1945
--North Carolina Court of Appeals 1968
--U.S. District Court, South Carolina 1999
--South Carolina Supreme Court 1996
--South Carolina Court of Appeals 1996
--Virginia Supreme Court 1930
--Virginia Court of Appeals 1930
--West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals 1991

FIFTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 1930
--Louisiana Supreme Court 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1980
--U.S. District Court, Northern, Mississippi 1997
--Mississippi Supreme Court 1994
--Mississippi Court of Appeals 1994
--Texas Supreme Court 1950
--Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950

SIXTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 1930
--Kentucky Supreme Court 1945
--Kentucky Court of Appeals 1945
--Michigan Supreme Court 1930
--Michigan Court of Appeals 1965
--Ohio Supreme Court 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District 1950
--Tennessee Supreme Court 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950

SEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 1930
--Illinois Supreme Court 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District 1985
--Indiana Supreme Court 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District 1940
--Indiana Tax Court 1986
--Wisconsin Supreme Court 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV 1945

EIGHTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 1930
--Arkansas Supreme Court 1957
--Arkansas Court of Appeals 1957
--Iowa Supreme Court 1995
--Iowa Court of Appeals 1995
--Minnesota Supreme Court 1930
--Minnesota Court of Appeals 1983
--Missouri Supreme Court 1960
--Missouri Court of Appeals 1960
--Nebraska Supreme Court 1965
--Nebraska Court of Appeals 1965
--U.S. District Court, North Dakota 1999
--North Dakota Supreme Court 1930
--North Dakota Court of Appeals 1930
--South Dakota Supreme Court 1965

NINTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1941
--Alaska Supreme Court 1960
--Alaska Court of Appeals 1960
--Arizona Supreme Court 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Central, California 1998
--California Supreme Court 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate District 1930
--Hawaii Supreme Court 1930
--Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 1930
--Idaho Supreme Court 1965
--Idaho Court of Appeals 1965
--Montana Supreme Court 1993
--Nevada Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Court of Appeals 1950
--Washington Supreme Court 1935
--Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division 1969

TENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit 1930
--Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
--Colorado Supreme Court 1930
--Colorado Court of Appeals 1930
--Kansas Supreme Court 1982
--Kansas Court of Appeals 1982
--New Mexico Supreme Court 1930
--New Mexico Court of Appeals 1930
--Oklahoma Supreme Court 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Appeals 1994
--Utah Supreme Court 1950
--Utah Court of Appeals 1950
--Wyoming Supreme Court 1993

ELEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit 1981
--Alabama Supreme Court 1955
--Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 1955
--Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals 1955
--Florida Supreme Court 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District 1950
--Georgia Supreme Court 1940
--Georgia Court of Appeals 1940

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy
professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to
remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the
email address that you would like removed in the subject line OR call toll
free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy
Statement".
*****************************************************************

FindLaw is a registered trademark of West Group. Lexis, Lexis-Nexis and
lexisONE are registered trademarks of LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed
Elsevier Inc.


Great.
Let's meet in Teb's office at 9.
If you bing the standard expansion contract, we can decide which provisions to put in the tariff.
Then, you and I can go through the individual contracts.
Based on our review we can decide if there are any deviations and if any are material.

-----Original Message-----
From: Holtzman, Staci
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:42 AM
To: King Jr., Frazier
Subject: RE: Meeting on Material Deviations

Sure.  I'll be there.

-----Original Message-----
From: King Jr., Frazier
Sent: Mon 1/28/2002 9:31 AM
To: Holtzman, Staci
Cc:
Subject: Meeting on Material Deviations

Staci,

Teb has a very narrow window to meet with us on material deviations.
Can you meet from 9 to 10 tomorrow?

Frazier


In case you enjoy looking at this stuff, please see attached.
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:08:49 -0400
From: "Richard Abraham" <rsabraham@tecoenergy.com>
To: "Claude DeMars" <cedemars@tecoenergy.com>, "Frank Busot"
<flbusot@tecoenergy.com>, "John Duff" <jtduff@tecoenergy.com>, "Kevin E.
Fleming" <kefleming@tecoenergy.com>, "Lucinda J. Saporta"
<ljsaporta@tecoenergy.com>, "Yogesh  Patel" <ympatel@tecoenergy.com>
Cc: "George D. Jennings" <gdjennings@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Fwd: Frontera Pictures
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_104A2B56.D0B1FF44"

Attached are some excellent pictures taken by David Kiepke of Frontera's
rotor at the Alstom repair facility in Richmond.

Abe
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:20:16 -0400
From: "David E. Kiepke" <dekiepke@tecoenergy.com>
To: "Richard Abraham" <rsabraham@tecoenergy.com>
Cc: "Yogesh  Patel" <ympatel@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Frontera Pictures
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_104A2B56.D1B0FE45"

Frontera Rotor Pictures in Alstom Power Repair Facility.

 - Frontera Rotor Inspection, Alstom Shop.doc
 - Frontera Rotor Parts, Alstom Shop Inspection.doc


No, I sent the email to you by mistake.  We will be at Sheri's tomorrow.  How
do you know her?  Is it through Dawn?  When Sheri sent the message to
everyone, I noticed your name on the list and called to ask, but you didn't
pick up, and I didn't leave a message.

DG


We have received the EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreements from the referenced CPs dated as listed.

Ash Grove Cement -6/5/2001
East Bay Municipal -6/13/2001

Copies will be distributed to legal and credit.


I thought you all would enjoy this.

http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2000-02-23/feature.html/print.html


I just spoke with Kim Hundl in the Confirms group. She's been told by PGE
that they do not want confirmation letters sent for daily deals. Apparently
there are a bunch of these in the system under your desk that are noted to be
confirmed. The confirms group can change all of these deals to "no confirm,"
but they wanted to double-check with you guys first. Do you agree with PGE,
or would you like these deals confirmed? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate


Attention:                    Reuters
                                    Simon Cheshire

Thank you for your interest in EnronOnline.

Following is a guest password that will allow you temporary view only access to EnronOnline. Please note that the Guest User ID and Guest Password are CASE SENSITIVE.

Guest User ID:                        JOR46768
Guest Password:                      JT92VH66

Please visit our web site at http://www.EnronOnline.com, and select the Register for EnronOnline link.  We look forward to receiving your completed Password Application and Registration Form so that your company may be considered for transaction access.

Sincerely,

Danny Lee
EnronOnline
713-853-HELP(4357)


I've been through both documents and can not find my comments.  I wonder if
there is a later draft somewhere?


fill me in.  how can i eavesdrop??

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NG YEAR ENd Quiz

I belong to a natgas discussion group on the internet. This is from one of
the guys. Basically they are a bunch of gastraders from various firms ( a lot
of producers, some industrials, some small shops and few i--banker types) I
found the test to be mildly amusing. And since I had no idea what 'club no
minors' was-- i was hoping for some insight from you guys. Fortunately, the
lovely Ms. Shipos was able to fill me in.

Anyway, while occasionally garbage, the discussions do provide insight on
what others are thinking of production, storage and other such matters. And
when I was a marketer, I found a few leads. Finally, since a lot of the
information revolves around gossip about a particular 'super trader' at the
big ENE , i find it amusing that one of the most reserved and modest
individuals I know is so talked about on the internet.

JF


"The Internal Revenue Service has announced that effective Jan. 1, 2000 the
reimbursement rate for business use of personal vehicles will increase from
31 cents per mile to 32.5 cents per mile.  Enron will reimburse at the new
rate for all mileage charges incurred after Jan 1".


Please print attachments.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/19/2000 04:21
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/19/2000 04:13:08 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: InterGen/ENA - GE Turbines & ABB Transformer

Attached are clean and redlined versions of revised drafts of (i) the
Letter Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP relating to CA
Energy Development I, LLC and the GE generator set, and (ii) the Letter
Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP relating to the ABB
transformer.  The Letter Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP
relating to CA Energy Development II, LLC and the GE generator set will
be in the same form as item (i) above with changes to reflect the proper
LLC.

To expedite matters, these revised drafts are being sent to you before
review by InterGen with the understanding that InterGen may have
additional changes and comments.

In addition to changes necessitated by the substitution of Sweetgum for
Tejas, the letter agreements have been revised to reflect the following
requirements of InterGen:

(i)  The parent guaranty on behalf of Sweetgum Energy LP has been
deleted;

(ii)  A mutual covenant requiring the Parties to use all reasonable
efforts to satisfy the conditions precedent as been added to the end of
Section 3; and

(iii)  A no shop clause on the part of ENA and its affiliates has been
added as  a new Section 17.

The reference to the TRY Ventures International agreement was deleted
from the letter agreement relating to the ABB transformer since it is my
understanding that the ABB transformer was not covered by Coral's
agreement with TRY.  ENA would nevertheless be protected by the general
language of the clause.

Although InterGen is still reviewing these documents for tax and other
concerns, for now the only contemplated changes to the LLC Agreements
and the GE and ABB acknowledgement letters are those needed to reflect
the substitution of Sweetgum for Tejas.

InterGen is still reviewing the Facility Agreement and exhibits
thereto.

I have passed on ENA's suggestion regarding the extension of the
closing date, but have not yet had a response from InterGen.

Doug Pedigo will be tied up tomorrow morning, but Doug and I are
available after lunch for a telephone conference to discuss any comments
you have on the closing.

George


Dad,

What is the rule for guests on the weekend?

Chris


I just wanted to say I love you and God bless you.

Beau


Donna, my portable PC I am using today is an IBM ThinkPad 600.  Please let
	me know if you need more info than that.  Thanks. Lynn


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

"The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>@ls.eei.org on
11/08/2000 10:28:43 AM
Please respond to "The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>
Sent by: bounce-app-ippexecs-33275@ls.eei.org
To: "Generation and Power Marketing Executives" <app-ippexecs@ls.eei.org>
cc:
Subject: Alliance FERC Alert-Regional Market Reports

Attached for your information are:

1.  The FERC orders regarding the meeting to be held Thursday, November 9.
2.  Annoucement of a hearing in San Diego on November 14.
3.  FERC report on bulk power markets in the Southeast Region
4.  FERC report on bulk power markets in the Midwest Region
5.  FERC report on bulk power markets in Northeast Region

These files will also be made available on the Alliance of Energy Suppliers
web site - http://www.eei.org/alliance
Should you have any questions concerning these reports, contact Jack Cashin
at 202-508-5499, or jcashin@eei.org

Nancy Tarr
Manager, Business Development
ntarr@eei.org

 - FERC 11-14 hearing.pdf
 - nov 9 panels.pdf
 - FERC.Southeast.PDF
 - FERCMidwest.PDF
 - FERCNortheast.PDF


Hair Loss Got You Down? Would You Like to do Something About it?

    Mention product code 15 to receive a $50 discount on your first order of hair accelerator.

Patented Hair Accelerator products are an all natural scientifically  proven way to stop hair loss and grow new hair!
Hair Accelerator products are the first drug-free "total attack" program that aggressively combats hair loss internally and externally. Our hair loss products have been clinically tested at Hospitals and Universities throughout the World.

Also Receive our FREE Online Guide to Hair Loss

       Start feeling confident again!                     Take the first step now!                                         We Can Help You!

  Click Here For Details

If you wish to be taken off our mailing list please click here .


Just a reminder:  The Industrial QBR is scheduled for Monday as follows:

   DATE:   8/14/00
   TIME:    1 PM - 4 PM
   PLACE:   EB 3321

Please mark your calendars for this meeting.


Andy,

As we discussed at our last meeting, I attach for your review a proposal to
expand the link between EnronOnline and HoustonStreet on a global basis.  I
think the proposal makes a lot of sense when entering new global markets.
If you have time, I would like to discuss this proposal and our current
round of financing at HoustonStreet tomorrow afternoon.  Are you available
tomorrow afternoon to talk?  Any time is good with me.

Best regards,
Frank

 <<EOL JVproposal.225.ppt>>

 - EOL JVproposal.225.ppt


I understand that some of you may not have received the attachment to Bob's
email.  I have attached it here for your review.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  I can be reached at
212-332-1203.

Thanks,

Kimberly Summe

 <<Convertible Bonds.doc>>


Jeff:

Attached is the latest version of the draft revised tariff(s) to file
when ETI gets final full approval.

The revisions are in redline (red and/or blue) per your request.

Let me know any issues.  Steve will be back in town Friday.

Jeremy
B & C

 - Enron CaliforniaTariff Sept v.4.doc


17:13:00 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Hodge, Jeffrey T.'
17:13:00 Synchronizing Hierarchy
17:13:01 Synchronizing Favorites
17:13:01 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
17:13:09 	   14 item(s) added to offline folder
17:13:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
17:13:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
17:13:10 	   3 item(s) added to offline folder
17:13:10 	   1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
17:13:11 	   1 item(s) updated in offline folder
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
17:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
17:13:12 Synchronizing Views
17:13:12 Synchronizing Forms
17:13:12 Done


Mark,

Firstly, thanks for the email on the reorganised EWS legal group. I am
delighted to be part of the legal policy group and look forward to working
more closely with you in connection with that and with Enron Wholesale
Services generally.

Secondly, I have faxed to you (to 001 713 646 2600) PRC feedback on our VP
candidates: Jon Chapman, Justin Boyd and Marcus Von Bock. I am happy to
discuss any of this with you if you so wish. If you need the same in respect
of me, no doubt you can get that from Michael Brown.

Thirdly, I attach for your information the Enron Europe Legal Department
Reorg Announcement which I hope to issue on Wednesday, together with my
working version of the org. chart.  Please let me know if you have any
comments on either document.

Thanks.

        Mark


Has this gone to Ken yet.  If not please send.

Maureen McVicker
06/21/2001 02:55 PM
To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Last FINAL version

Lora:

This is the new "Final" version.  The difference from the earlier version is
- a few slides were taken out and the order of the remaining slides were
rearranged.

Please get a copy of this new "Final" to Ken Lay.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 06/21/2001 02:53 PM -----

	Ursula Brenner
	06/21/2001 01:05 PM

		 To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Last version

This is the final version, including the changes Jeff just requested.

Ursula


What a tangled mess.  please call and splain what's going on here.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Bob Chandler                           05/10/2000 10:33 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

Please note that if TW eventually decides to file for a tariff change to
allow cash in lieu of in-kind fuel retention that Rod would like to see our
proposed accounting methodology included in the filing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

05/10/2000 10:25 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

If FERC is going to tell us the accounting or specifically approve our
proposed accounting then I have no issues.     I do not want to have a tariff
change with our interpretation of accounting requirements for it, without
that specific approval.   So I guess we need to specifically ask for approval
of the accounting.

	From:  Bob Chandler                           05/10/2000 09:32 AM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

See responses below.

Rod Hayslett

05/10/2000 06:38 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

Some simple questions?

As I indicated this morning, it's not that I "want" to classify these credits
as revenues in order to achieve any commercial, regulatory, overhead
allocation or tax objectives, but if all other factors are considered equal
believe that revenue treatment is the most appropriate decision from  both
GAAP and FERC USofA standpoints.

FERC USofA

In the "Shipper Supplied Gas" section of Order 581 the Commission concluded
that "it is not appropriate to mandate revenue recognition for gas provided
by shippers for compressor fuel and other pipeline system use and used to
provide transportation services.  Instead, each pipeline will have the
discretion to determine whether it will recognize revenue for these
transactions in its accounting records...Pipelines electing to recognize
shipper provided gas as revenue must also recognize an equal amount of
purchased gas expense.  Pipelines would credit the appropriate transportation
revenue account (Accounts 489.1 through 489.4) and record an equal amount in
Account 805, Other Gas Purchases."    We have chosen not to recognize
revenue, but we do want to track our transactions, so we debit and credit
different subaccounts of acct 805.  The over-retained volumes on TW are
debited to acct 805 and credited to acct 495 Other Revenues (also in
accordance with Order 581. However, for internal reporting we map the 495
credit to cost of transport (expense).    Sounds reasonable to me.    Will
you be able to continue that in SAP? Yes.  We'll be using statistical orders
in lieu of subaccounts.
While the Commission agreed that pipelines would not be required to recognize
shipper provided gas on its books, it did require those who chose to do so to
record it as transportation revenue, not as a credit to fuel or gas purchase
expense.

GAAP

Revenues.  Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6 defines revenues
as inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its
liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or purchasing goods,
rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity's ongoing
major or central operations.

In the TW proposal the cash inflows are the result of a fuel charge factor in
the transportation tariff.  TW's ongoing major or central operation is the
rendering of natural gas transportation services to shippers pursuant to its
tariff.  Therefore  the credits resulting from the assessment of the fuel
charge constitute transportation revenues.    I don't think there is a
limitation with respect to cash received in lieu of gas.  When gas is
retained we can debit and credit 805 and it's a wash.  When we receive cash
we have to charge a balance sheet account (Cash) and credit an income
statement account.  We can't opt out of recording an earnings creating
transaction.   What is the argument that this cash does not just take the
place of Gas you would have received and should track the normal accounting
for gas?  The cash alone cannot take the place of a retained volume; the cash
together with a gas purchase is the volumetric equivalent of a volume
retained.   Under this proposal we would charge gas purchase expense when the
cash is used to buy gas that would replace the volumes not retained in
kind.   I am concerned that what you are proposing may not work as well after
the next rate case (since I don't believe it likely we will be allowed to
continue to collect the windfall) and we may be setting ourselves up for
restatements.    But I guess it really won't matter, because whatever we do
FERC will have specifically ordered us to account for it that way, isn't that
right?  There is nothing about our current or proposed accounting that would
have to be changed as the result of a future rate case that changes the
volumetric retention factors.  However, if a tracker is imposed, then we
would have additional entries to make, similar to those we now make on NNG.
In any event, the  imbalance cashout  approach described below  would result
in the recording of fuel retention entries  (debit and credit account 805)
exactly the same as we now record for volumes  retained.  It would merely
result in the additional entry to resolve the imbalance by debiting cash and
crediting the imbalance receivable from the shipper.

Expenses.  Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5 speaks to the
recognition of expenses and losses:  "Further guidance for recognition of
expenses and losses is intended to recognize consumption (using up) of
economic benefits...during a period.  Expenses...are generally recognized
when an entity's economic benefits are used up in delivering or producing
goods, rendering service, or other activities that constitute its ongoing
major or central operations..."

In the TW proposal natural gas volumes are consumed in the operation of
compressor engines to render natural gas transportation service to
shippers...the ongoing major or central operation of the company.  Receiving
cash from shippers in accordance with the Tariff's fuel charge does not
reduce the consumption of natural gas volumes in rendering transportation
service, Instead it provides economic assets (cash) to the company to pay for
the gas volumes that have to be acquired to run the compressors.  Therefore
the proceeds from the fuel charge represent transportation revenues for the
company, not a fuel or gas purchase expense reduction.     I recently
received a memo from Susan Scott (Legal) indicating that in approving tariff
changes to allow shippers to pay cash for fuel use rather than to provide
in-kind volumes, FERC looks at the situation as being analogous to cashing
out an imbalance, where the imbalance was created by the shipper not
delivering the fuel retention volumes.  If we followed FERC's lead here we
would record the fuel retention entries with a debit and credit to Account
805, then credit the cash receipt from the shipper as a reduction of its
imbalance.  Any gain or loss on the cash-out would be credited to Acct 495
(gain) or charged to Acct 813 (loss), just like any other gain or loss on
resolution of an imbalance.

I think the cashout approach will probably meet the objective of not bloating
reported margins...at least if the tariff language is consistent with this
concept.  If you prefer this cashout approach to my original proposal to
record fee revenue, then I will go ahead and re-draft the accounting memo
along those lines.  Any final determination of the appropriate accounting,
though, would have to be made after the language in the tariff revision is
finalized. However, if the cashout approach is your preference, then I expect
that we could work with Rates to make sure that the tariff language doesn't
conflict with the cashout approach.

Shall I re-draft and recirculate the memo using the cashout approach?

Rod Hayslett

05/08/2000 06:32 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

I guess I'd like to understand the reason for wanting to call them
revenue?

	From:  Bob Chandler                           05/05/2000 06:04 PM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

I don't disagree that there are frequently numerous ways to account for
things--and some ways are better than others for tax, regulatory, financing
and other purposes.  From an historical perspective before Order 636 we
didn't seem to have any difficulty recording the proceeds from the PGA
tracker portion of the tariff as transportation revenue.  Under the proposed
circumstances, we are charging a fee based on average fuel retention
percentages that are set somewhat higher than actual consumption and there is
no requirement for a true-up.  In this circumstance, even though we may call
it a fuel reimbursement factor, it seems to be more characteristic of revenue
than expense credit.

That having been said, if it's deemed to be advantageous to the company to
account for these cash proceeds as an expense credit, I could support
crediting the proceeds to a/c 805 similar to our accounting for volumetric
fuel retention.  If that's the path you'd like us to follow, I'll amend the
draft memo accordingly.  Please confirm.

Rod Hayslett

05/05/2000 06:58 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

My first blush problems are 2.     1) This is really reimbursement for an
item that is designated an expense - compressor fuel and so I don't know why
you want to show it as revenue.     2)   Having a stat order will not help
the income statement presentation of revenues, a lower percentage of costs
being recovered from demand charges, a major factor if we decide to make TW
really stand on its own.

What is the reason for wanting to bloat the revenue in the income
statement?     Explain the logic for showing a revenue item for the contra of
an item that has been determined to be an expense.

	From:  Bob Chandler                           05/04/2000 04:16 PM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

If we go with the transport revenue approach, we would for sure set up a
separate SAP statistical order to accumulate the fuel reimbursement fee
separately from the other revenue components.  If you think this approach is
distortive from a reporting trend perspective, we could classify these
revenues as "other gas revenues" on our GAAP statements--similar to the way
we've classified excess fuel retention revenue in TW's 1999 GAAP statements.

Rod Hayslett

05/04/2000 02:41 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

I would think at a minimum we would like to have some kind of a tracking
account (nojn-FERC)  for accounting purposes to be able to tell the earnigs
impact of the transactions.      I have a problem with recording the revenue
in a plain transportation revenue account since it will skew the percentage
of transport revenues collected from demand charges  which is an important
piece for the financial world.   Ultimately I guess FERC will tell us how to
account for it.

	From:  Bob Chandler                           05/04/2000 12:55 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steve Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Jerry Thomas Moore/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo

From what we have so far been able to learn about the referenced proposal,
and after discussions with Dan Fancler, I prepared the attached draft of an
accounting memorandum for your consideration.

Please advise if you have additional facts or ideas to be considered.

By copy of this memo I'm asking Jerry Moore for excise tax advice as to
whether TW would risk incurring excise tax if we record gas sales to the
shippers and then retain the volumes for fuel.


[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	Click Here to Start Shopping  [IMAGE] Ashford has the gift solution for you. Our new Gift Center makes it convenient for you to search by occasion, by price or by gifts for him or her. We've pre-selected some of our favorite items and made it easy for you to find the perfect gift for someone special in your life. Start your gift shopping today by clicking on the selections below.

[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		 [IMAGE] P.S. Please feel free to forward this email to all of your friends. They'll thank you for it! Friends can subscribe to Ashford.com email by clicking here: Subscribe to Ashford.com . [IMAGE] Let us hear from you. If you have any suggestions or any problems with your email, or if you need to change your email address, please contact jschunter@ashford.com.  [IMAGE] You are receiving this email because you have subscribed to the Ashford newsletter. To unsubscribe, send a message to unsubscribe@ashford.com   and put the word 'remove' in the subject line.
		[IMAGE]


Please review the transport positions in sitara for next month.  We should
have the Baja transport included.  100,000 short for PG&E topock, 80,000 long
Citygate, and 20,000 long KRS.  The sj to socal transport should be broken
out to like 24,000 topock, 14,000 mojave, and the balance to pg&e topock.
Also, please check on the kingsgate to malin and stanfield to malin for next
month.  What about sj to waha?

Patti, please run a report showing all of the sitara transport deals.  Thank
you!

Mike


Looks good to me, although I will have a new fax number soon.  I will ask
Twanda to send it to you once I know what it is.  Michelle

	LaVerne Essoufi@ENRON
	05/12/2000 10:49 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Phone list update

Please make the necessary corrections to following attachment to help update
our current phone list.

Thanks,
LaVerne


This is purely fun.  Open the .ppt attachment.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert B. Weisenmiller [mailto:rbw@mrwassoc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Alan Comnes
Subject: Fwd: FW: No blame, no pain, no gain...

cute

Bob

Delivered-To: mrwassoc@moe.sfrn.dnai.com
Reply-To: <bill@jbsenergy.com>
From: "Bill Marcus" <bill@jbsenergy.com>
To: "Jeff Nahigian" <jeff1@jbsenergy.com>, "Jim Helmich" <jim1@jbsenergy.com>,
   "Gayatri Schilberg" <gayatri1@jbsenergy.com>,
   "Rachel and Barry (E-mail)" <orlins_bergman@msn.com>,
   "Andrews Family (E-mail)" <andrews4549@cs.com>,
   "Patricia Wheeler (E-mail)" <wheeler@yolo.com>,
   "Bill Spratley (E-mail)" <wspratley@aol.com>,
   "Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
   "Brady Johnson (E-mail)" <BradyJ@atg.wa.gov>,
   "Cynthia Mitchell (E-mail)" <ckmitchell@powernet.net>,
   "Chris Bowman (E-mail)" <cbowman@sacbee.com>,
   "Ed Smeloff (E-mail 2)" <esmeloff@puc.sf.ca.us>,
   "Fred Schmidt (E-mail)" <fschmidt@halelane.com>,
   "Eric Witkoski (E-mail)" <epwitkos@ag.state.nv.us>,
   "Jack Pous (E-mail)" <lduci@earthlink.net>,
   "JA Savage (E-mail)" <honest@compuserve.com>,
   "Jan Hamrin (E-mail)" <jhamrin@resource-solutions.org>,
   "Jan McFarland (E-mail)" <jmcfarland@worldnet.att.net>,
   "Jim Caldwell (E-mail)" <tgaljhc@aol.com>,
   "David Argue (E-mail)" <david.argue@sympatico.ca>,
   "Paul Chernick (E-mail)" <PChernick@ResourceInsight.com>,
   "Robyn Kain (E-mail)" <robyn@jcis.net>,
   "Sara Myers (E-mail)" <ssmyers@worldnet.att.net>,
   "Savannah Blackwell (E-mail)" <savannah_blackwell@sfbg.com>,
   "Shawn McMurray (E-mail)" <ShawnM@ag.state.ar.us>,
   "Steve Ostrover (E-mail)" <sostrover@econone.com>,
   "Theresa Mueller (E-mail)" <theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us>,
   "Tom Greene (E-mail)" <greenet@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us>
Subject: FW: No blame, no pain, no gain...
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 17:01:55 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-Envelope-To: <rbw@mrwassoc.com>
X-MDRemoteIP: 208.59.199.22
X-MDRcpt-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Florio [ <mailto:mflorio@turn.org>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:19 PM
To: gbrownstein@turn.org; bfinkelstein@turn.org; rcosta@turn.org; nhoge@turn.org; turn@turn.org; hayley@turn.org; marcel@turn.org; jfeazell@turn.org; shawkes@turn.org; freedman@turn.org; raka@turn.org; shlomit@turn.org; rshattuc@turn.org; randy@turn.org; janthony@turn.org; dwightcocke@turn.org; katmack@turn.org; vicw@cceeb.org; rtf@cpuc.ca.gov; zabel.allan@epamail.epa.gov; bkermish@best.com; peter@awad-singer.com; drichard@well.com; mbarmor@muse.sfusd.k12.ca.us; mbarmor@muse.sfusd.edu; joel@awad-singer.com; lgg2@pge.com; rtfrtf@pacbell.net; peter@stopwaste.org; lga@mother.com; bill@jbsenergy.com
Subject: Fwd: No blame, no pain, no gain...

From: "Strategy Integration Inc." <estrategy@mindspring.com>
To: "Michael Shames" <mshames@ucan.org>, "Mike Florio" <mflorio@turn.org>
Subject: No blame, no pain, no gain...
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 07:21:18 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-RCPT-TO: <mflorio@turn.org>

Michael and Mike,

I got this from Wally Roberts, but it looks like PPT presentation that Jim Sweeney of Stanford was showing at MAG.

You should open it; it's fun.

Eric


Scott Earnest announced in the staff meeting today that in a meeting he had
earlier today with Jeff Shankman and Vince Kaminiski that Jeff announced that
he had gotten the nod from Mark Frevert to manage the LNG book of business.
(This sentence structure is bad, but you get the drift.)  That is probably
what Shankman has alluded to in terms of increased responsibility.  I will
assume that is in addition to gas, but I don't know that for sure.

Scott has been working on setting up the risk books for LNG, working closely
over the last several weeks with Vince Kaminski.  We need to talk about this
business and the best way to support it.  Have you had any conversations with
Jeff on this?


Kevin,

A quick question before our meeting.  Didn't we have a little different form
that you used at HPL?  I thought I remembered a little different version of
the Contract Approval Sheet.  One that had more detail and description of the
risks.

Thanks,
Mike


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 03:13 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/09/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Congressional Hearing Schedule/State Senate Hearing Rescheduled

Following is detailed information regarding the Congressional hearing
schedule this week.

I have just learned that the State Senate Investigative hearings originally
scheduled to begin at10am this Wednesday at the State Capitol has been
rescheduled for the 18th.

If you hear otherwise please let us know asap.

Below are:
 ?  Press Release issued by House Committee outlining hearing schedule and
location
 ?; Media Advisory that outlines hearing participants

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

California Public Utilities Commission President to Testify Tuesday;

Press Release:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman to Testify Wednesday

Witnesses were finalized today for three Government Reform Committee hearings
next week on the California energy crisis:

California Public Utilities Commission President Loretta Lynch will testify
Tuesday morning in Sacramento, where the focus will be on actions taken by
state regulators. She will be joined by the President and CEO of the
California Independent System Operator, Terry Winter.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Curt Hebert will testify
Wednesday in San Jose. He will be followed by senior officials from Pacific
Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison.

Wednesday?s hearing in San Diego will feature testimony from major wholesale
energy producers, including Reliant Energy and Williams Energy Services.

Times and locations are listed below. For a complete witness list, please see
the Committee?s website: www.house.gov/reform.

Schedule:
TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2001 11 a.m. PST

Sacramento Convention Center

1400 J Street - Room #204

WEDNESDAY, April 11, 2001 9:30 a.m. PST

San Jose State University

One Washington Square in Loma Prieta Ballroom

THURSDAY, April 12, 2001 10 a.m. PST

San Diego Board of Supervisors

1600 Pacific Highway- Room #358

;

-30-

;Media Advisory:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; Contact: Mark
Corallo/ Josie Duckett
April 5, 2001 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; (202)225-5074

;

*** Media Advisory***

WASHINGTON, D.C. --- The House Government Reform Committee will hold three
field hearings next week in California to look into the state?s energy
crisis. The hearings, entitled ?Assessing the California Crisis: How Did We
Get to This Point, and Where Do We Go From Here?y will take place on April 10
in Sacramento, April 11 in San Jose and April 12 in San Diego.

TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2001 11 a.m. PST

Sacramento Convention Center

1400 J Street - Room #204

Panel One
Mr. Ed Yates - Senior Vice President, California League of Food Processors

Mr. Lewis K. Uhler - President, The National Tax Limitation Committee

Mr. Pete Verboom - Glenn County Dairyman

Panel Two

Mr. Kevin Madden- General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Mrs. Loretta Lynch - President, California Public Utilities Commission

Mr. Terry M. Winter - President and Chief Executive Officer, California
Independent System Operator

Mr. Larry Makovich - Senior Director, Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Panel Three

The Honorable J. William MacDonald - Acting Commissioner, Bureau of
Reclamation

Mr. Brian Jobson - Principal Power Contract Specialist, Sacramento Municipal
Utility District

Ms. Becky Dell Sheehan - Principal Power Contract Specialist, California Farm
Bureau Federation

Mr. Lewis K. Uhler - President, The National Tax Limitation Committee

WEDNESDAY, April 11, 2001 9:30 a.m. PST

San Jose State University in Loma Prieta Ballroom

One Washington Square

Panel One

The Honorable Curt Hebert - Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Panel Two

Ms. Dede Hapner - Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company

Mr. Robert G. Foster - Senior Vice President of External Affairs, Southern
California Edison

Dean N. Vanech - President, Delta Power Company

Mr. Paul E. Desrochers - Director of Fuel Procurement, Thermo Ecotek

THURSDAY, April 12, 2001 10 a.m. PST

San Diego Board of Supervisors Room #358

1600 Pacific Highway

Panel One

Mr. Sam Hardage - President, Woodfin Suite Hotels, LLC

Mr. John Wiederkehr - President, Certified Metal Craft, Inc.

Mr. Douglas Barnhart - President, Dougles E. Barnhart, Inc.

Mark W. Seetin - Vice President Government Affairs, New York Mercantile
Exchange

Panel Two

Kevin Madden- General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Stephen L. Baum - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, Sempra Energy

Mr. Steve Malcolm - President, Williams Energy Services

John Stout - Senior Vice President for Asset Commercialization, Reliant Energy

;

NOTE: Witness List is subject to change
;
;


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/10/2000
05:49 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
08/10/2000 04:06 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: New Associates

In the fundamentals group under Hunter, there is also research going on
regarding LNG, and distillates, (and gas, weather, etc).  Vikas' background
is in crude and products, and worked at Aquiva with two of Lagrasta's
marketers.  I agreed to take him (6 months ago) and was planning for him to
research crude/products.  Celeste Roberts knows the conversations we had with
Vikas in particular becuase he wanted to start meeting people in my group and
originally did not come through the associate program, where we finally put
him, and she was involved from the beginning.  Li Sun is a Wharton MBA that
Lavo did not originally pick when he went through the list with you, and was
slated to go elsewhere.    I picked her up, after that, and she too is
someone about whom Celeste and I had many conversations. I had met her last
summer, and at Wharton recruiting events.  Prior to John's coming down
Celeste and I had agreed she could come into my organization (gas) to do
research, or to work with Vince--she is an unbelievable modeler.  I have no
idea who the other two are or where they are going, and have not met either
of them.

I suspect now that we have delineated recruiting and staffing, which occurred
recently, we won't have this confusion among the associate program
administrators again.

Not trying to kill you,

Jeff

David W Delainey
08/10/2000 03:08 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Associates

Jeff, you are killing me - we targeted that group specifically to build the
risk business in gas and east power in the short run.  This was well planned
effort.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000
03:00 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway@ENRON
08/10/2000 02:54 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Associates

Dave and John, I spoke to Jeff Shenkman and he has indicated that the
following new associates are to support him in his role in Global Markets:

Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Although Jeff mentioned a fourth associate, these are the only 3 that are
identified in our system.

John after speaking with you, it is clear that you have not been in contact
with Jeff regarding these associates supporting him.

Dave, can we discuss this matter?  I can be reached at 713/853-7351.  My
pager # is 1-800-980-1665.  Thanks.