Elizabeth-

Do you still send confirms to counterparties for physical deals done day to
day?  AEP has a problem with one of the confirms on a deal done Jan. 31.
They sold us two packages of 5000 at PGE Citygate for 12.30 and 12.40.  I
entered this as one deal for 10000 at 12.35.  They need the confirm to match
their records for each deal.  If you could send another confirm I would
appreciate it.  Thanks for your help.

Matt Lenhart


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------

"Scarbeko" <scarbeko@entropia.com.pl> on 01/29/2001 07:35:10 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: praca dyplomowa V Edycja MBA Warszawa

Szanowny Panie Doktorze,
?
?
Na samym pocz?tku chciabym sic przypomnie+.  Jestem studentem V edycji MBA w ?Wy_szej Szkole Handlu i Finans?w  Micdzynarodowych w Warszawie i wraz z ?Panami Jerzym Seremakiem i Waldemarem  Mrozem piszemy u pana Doktora pracc ?dyplomow? z finans?w  micdzynarodowych. Nsze prace przesaem do Pana Doktora ?juz w listopadzie  ubiegego roku i do tej pory nie dostaem potwirerdzenia, ?_e Pan je otrzyma.  Bardzo bym prosi o potwierdzenie otrzymania tych_e prac ?lub zaprzeczenie.  ?Panie Doktorze nastepna sprawa dotyczy zapytania  czy Pa?stwa Firma byaby
zainteresowana inwestycjami w budow? elektrowni na  Ukrainie. Pracujc w
firmie konsultingowej kt?ra zajmuje sic min. tego  typu biznesem. Nie jest to
dla nas pierwszy kontakt z tego rodzaju inwestycjami,  poniewa_ w obecnej
chwili przygotowujemy sie do kontraktu? z  niemieck?? firm? Lahmeyer
International na budowc elektrowni 150 MW  Szczeg?ly moge podac je_eli
Panstwo wyrazicie  zainteresowanie.
?
Z powa_aniem Tomasz  Bach?


Brian,

Attached please find a copy of the model for the Monterrey Cogeneration Project (Vitro).  Please give me a call with any questions.

Steve Irvin


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009331&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009331
Request Create Date : 12/6/00 9:14:44 AM
Requested For       : rachel.cady@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Other
Resource Type       : Applications


The FERC "Westwide" order issued at approximately 8 p.m. EDT Tuesday and per the order is effective begining 6/20/01.  It is available at http://www.ferc.gov/electric/bulkpower.htm.

A few hard copies are at my desk in Portland.


FYI.

---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001 03:45 PM
---------------------------

Thane Twiggs@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/10/2001 08:24 PM
To: Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:

Today the Protocol Review Subcommittee passed unanimously a revision request
that will allow ercot to grant "provisional authorization" to QSE to provide
ancillary services for a period of 90 days while any deficiencies in the
certification can be corrected.  The request will be sent to the TAC where it
will have an e-mail vote and I would not anticipate any opposition.

To receive the "provisional authorization" the QSE needs to have performed an
Ancillary Services qualification test in good faith but failed to qualify due
to problems that in the opinion of ERCOT, are noncritical for providing one
or more ancillary services.  My understanding is that Frontera has not had
the primary test.  According to John Adams at ERCOT four have been scheduled
and subsequently cancelled.  It will be critical to schedule and complete the
test to be considered for the "provisional authorization".

I spoke with John Adams regarding staffing to help perform the qualification
tests and he said that they would be able to do the certification tests at
about any time without any major scheduling delays.  The only time when they
would not be able to do the tests would be when ESCA will take control of the
systems to perform cut-over operations.

Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or 8779688967@skytel.com


109TQQ

Print Request:   Selected Document(s): 6,22,39,40,66

Time of Request: December 11, 2000  07:25 pm EST
Number of Lines: 475
Job Number:      59:0:18429396
Client ID/Project Name: 70

Research Information:

General News;American Telephone & Telegraph, NCR, (pooling of interests)

Note:
Hi Jeff, here are the docs I thought were good, keep in mind that I referenced
these in my paper.  Cheers

6 of 67 DOCUMENTS

The Associated Press

The materials in the AP file were compiled by The Associated Press. These
materials may not be republished without the express written consent of The
Associated Press.

August 29, 1991, Thursday, BC cycle

SECTION: Business News

LENGTH: 322 words

HEADLINE: NCR to Sell Stock Privately to Consummate Merger With AT&T

DATELINE: NEW YORK

BODY:

NCR Corp. and American Telephone & Telegraph Co. said Thursday they have
agreed to sell 6.3 million shares of NCR privately as part of the phone
company's purchase of the computer maker.

The companies announced earlier this month they would sell the stock to the
public in a step to obtain regulatory approval of their merger as a "pooling
of
interests."

Such approval provides favorable tax treatment for AT&T. But the company
could not obtain such a ruling from regulators because NCR had repurchased
some
of its stock from the public in the two years preceeding the May 6 merger
announcement, which is not allowed under regulations.

To undo those stock purchases, NCR announced Aug. 9 it would sell the 6.3
million shares back to the public.

But the companies said Thursday they had decided to sell the stock privately
instead, at $ 102.75 a share, to clients of four affiliates of The Capital
Group
Inc., a Los Angeles-based investment management company.

AT&T said the private placement would limit the chances of unfavorable market
conditions at the time of a public offering.

NCR stock closed Thursday at $ 108.12 a share on the New York Stock Exchange,
up 37 cents.

The NCR shares will be converted into AT&T shares when the merger is
completed. The deal will make the Capital Group clients the largest AT&T
shareholder collectively, at about 1.5 percent, the phone company said. AT&T
is
the most widely held stock, so no single shareholder owns a large percentage
of
its stock.

The stock sale will be completed after NCR shareholders approve the merger at
a meeting Sept. 13, the two companies said.

The four Capital Group companies involved in the stock purchase are Capital
Research and Management Co., manager of the American Funds Group of mutual
funds; Capital Guardian Trust Co., a manager of institutional accounts;
Capital
International Ltd., based in London; and Capital International S.A. of Geneva.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

22 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The New York Times Company

The New York Times

July 4, 1991, Thursday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section D; Page 2; Column 5; Financial Desk

LENGTH: 529 words

HEADLINE: A.T.& T. Alters Merger To Win Audit Ruling

BYLINE: By ALISON LEIGH COWAN

BODY:

The American Telephone and Telegraph Company said yesterday that it had
modified the terms of its merger deal with the NCR Corporation to settle
questions about the accounting method to be used in the transaction.

The telecommunications giant is seeking approval from the Securities and
Exchange Commission to use the pooling-of-interest accounting method for the
merger transaction, but some aspects of the deal may not qualify for the
favorable treatment.

The stakes are high for NCR shareholders. If the pooling method is allowed,
A.T.& T. will use an all-stock transaction to buy NCR, which will be tax-free
to
NCR shareholders. If the method is not allowed, A.T.& T. will pay 60 percent
stock and 40 percent cash, with the cash portion subject to taxation.

Special Dividend

Under the pooling method, companies are generally not allowed to pay a
special dividend or otherwise alter their equity capital before a merger. But
in
March, trying to fend off the A.T.& T. takeover by making it less attractive
to
NCR shareholders, NCR paid a $1 special dividend.

To counter that dividend and remove some of questons about using the
pooling-of-interest treatment, A.T.& T. said yesterday that NCR would withhold
its next two quarterly dividends of 37 cents each. A.T.& T. also said that it
would raise the price it is paying for NCR shares by 74 cents each, or $50
million, to $7.4 billion, or $110.74 a share. The higher price, A.T.& T. said,
reflects the increased value it will be receiving in NCR because of the two
forgone dividends.

"The omission of the quarterly dividend would, in effect, neutralize the
effects of the special dividend, and that would prevent the possibility that
the
special dividend could create a problem for pooling," said Jane Biba, an A.T.&
T. spokeswoman.

$1.37 a Share in 1991

She said that under the plan, NCR shareholders would collect a total of
$1.37 in dividends a share in 1991 versus the $1.11 or $1.48 they might have
received had there been no special dividend and had three or four quarterly
dividends been paid before a merger.

She said that A.T.& T. had been told by its auditors, NCR's auditors and the
accounting firm that audits its investment bank that these revisions should
allow the deal to qualify for pooling treatment.

"You have three highly reputable accounting firms who have said this is in
accordance with the literature and that we are entitled to pooling," she said.

Not Yet Convinced

But John C. Burton, an accounting professor at Columbia University and a
former chief accountant for the S.E.C., said he was still unconvinced that the
regulators should approve the pooling proposed.

"If they're going to pay out 74 cents a share more and NCR is not going to
pay out a dividend, that's just a wash," Professor Burton said. "I don't see
how
that makes a difference. I would hope the auditors of the commission would
make
it clear they can't undertake such an exercise successfully."

The S.E.C. said yesterday that it had no comment.

A.T.&T.'s shares closed unchanged on the New York Stock Exchange yesterday at
$39.25, while NCR shares gained 25 cents to close at $108.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: July 4, 1991

39 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The New York Times Company

The New York Times

May 7, 1991, Tuesday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section A; Page 1; Column 5; Financial Desk

LENGTH: 1474 words

HEADLINE: A.T.&T. Buying Computer Maker In Stock Deal Worth $7.4 Billion

BYLINE: By EBEN SHAPIRO

BODY:

After more than five months of stubborn resistance, NCR agreed yesterday to
be acquired by A.T.& T. for $7.4 billion worth of A.T.& T. stock.

The acquisition signals the American Telephone and Telegraph Company's
determination to expand beyond telecommunications to compete in computers with
giants like NEC and Fujitsu of Japan, Siemens of Germany and I.B.M.

In starting its quest to buy the NCR Corporation, A.T.& T. was seeking a
permanent solution to the problem of its money-losing computer business and
hoping to find a way to expand into new markets, ones that increasingly rely
on
linking computers and communications. Analysts say A.T.& T.'s computer
business
has lost more than $2 billion in six years.

NCR, based in Dayton, Ohio, grew from the National Cash Register Company (it
still makes some cash registers) to become the fifth-largest computer maker in
the country.

When A.T.& T. began its pursuit of NCR in December, many industry observers
were surprised that kindly Ma Bell had put on the grim visage of a corporate
raider. The hostile bid was another milestone in the transformation of the
heavily regulated bureaucratic monopoly that existed before the 1984
court-ordered breakup of the Bell System.

In recent years, as a more aggressive corporation, A.T.& T. has cut costs and
more closely tied executive pay to profit levels.

Robert E. Allen, the chairman of A.T.& T., said yesterday that with NCR the
company would work toward providing "global computer networks as easy to use
and
accessible as the telephone network is today."

Jack B. Grubman, an analyst with Paine Webber Inc., said: "A.T.& T. would
like to be a $100 billion company by the end of the decade. They would love to
be able to go to the chief executive officer of Nestle and say, 'We will
provide
you soup to nuts, your entire information network.' "

Given that assumption, Mr. Grubman and others say more large deals are likely
to follow. "Over the next decade they will do several more deals of this size
or
bigger," Mr. Grubman said.

Under the definitive merger agreement, A.T.& T. will exchange $110 worth of
its own stock for each NCR share, but on the New York Stock Exchange
yesterday,
NCR's shares closed at just $104, up 50 cents. The difference reflects the
fact
that investors are expected to have to wait four months for the deal to close.
But that price is still more than double the $48 that NCR was trading for a
month before A.T T. made its first offer in December. A.T.& T.'s shares
slipped
37.5 cents yesterday, to $36.75.

A.T.& T. dwarfs NCR in size, with 1990 revenues of $37.3 billion, compared
with $6.2 billion for NCR. Still, the computer maker will provide A.T.& T.
important entries into financial and retail industries. NCR is in the process
of
introducing a line of "open system" computers that are capable of being linked
with computers and software made by different manufacturers.

The merger agreement signed yesterday is subject to the approval of NCR
shareholders.

The First Bid

It all started in December, when A.T.& T. offered $90 a share, or $6.1
billion, for NCR. By keeping A.T.& T. at bay during the winter, Charles E.
Exley
Jr., NCR's chairman, was able to cajole A.T.& T. into paying an additional
$1.3
billion.

"He has done a lot for shareholders," said Don Geogerian, head of research of
Dreyfus Management Inc., an institutional stockholder of NCR.

Martin D. Sass of M. D. Sass Investors Services said, "Mr. Exley played his
cards pretty strongly to get A.T.& T. up to $110."

In the end, the booming stock market made a hero out of Mr. Exley.

A.T.& T.'s stock was trading around $30 in December. At the time, A.T.& T.
said it was willing to pay for NCR with stock or cash. A stock offer at that
time would have involved three A.T.& T. shares for each NCR share.

But in April, with the shares of A.T.& T. above $37, A.T.& T. could agree to
meet NCR's asking price of $110, at minimal additional cost.

A.T.& T. plans to issue new stock to acquire NCR. Analysts estimated that the
new stock would dilute A.T.& T.'s per-share earnings by 10 to 15 cents a year.

Staying in Dayton

A.T.& T. said NCR would retain its headquarters in Dayton, and its corporate
name. Mr. Allen, the A.T.& T. chairman, said NCR would continue to support
civic
and philanthropic organizations in Dayton.

The companies have been on the verge of an agreement for three weeks. Part of
the final haggling was over how much protection NCR shareholders would have if
A.T.& T.'s stock price fell while the acquisition was being completed.

In a compromise, A.T.& T. agreed to insure that NCR shareholders would
receive $110 worth of stock as long as A.T.& T. shares traded between $34.125
and $40.625.

The exact number of A.T.& T. shares to be exchanged for each NCR share will
be determined by A.T.& T.'s average closing price during the 20 trading days
before NCR shareholders meet to vote on the merger. A date for the meeting has
not been set, but it is expected to take place in four to five months.

The maximum number of A.T.& T. shares exchanged for each NCR share would be
3.223, if A.T.& T. stock fell to $34.125 or below. The minimum number would be
2.708, if A.T.& T. stock was $40.625 or above.

Analysts said it was unlikely that A.T.& T. stock would fall below $34.125
without a significant overall market drop. Several analysts have predicted
that
A.T.& T.'s stock would rise to about $50 in the next 12 months.

As an all-stock deal, the merger would be tax-free to NCR stockholders.

Some Special Accouting

The all-stock deal also makes it possible for A.T.& T. to use an accounting
treatment known as a pooling of interests, which would be favorable to its
reported earnings.

A.T.& T. and NCR plan to talk to the Securities and Exchange Commission to
determine if the pooling method can be used. If not, A.T.& T. plans to offer
40
percent cash and 60 percent stock.

Mr. Exley led the resistance to A.T.& T.'s offer, initially saying NCR was
worth at least $125 a share. Before NCR's March 28 annual meeting, he said he
would accept $110.

Mr. Exley, who has more than 30 years of experience in the computer business,
played an unusually active role in fending off A.T.& T., as he and his
management team kept the company's Wall Street advisers on a tight leash.

"Let's just say that they are very actively involved in deciding their own
approach to things," said a person working with NCR.

During the takeover fight, NCR contended that A.T.& T. was taking advantage
of a temporary drop in NCR's stock price. But beyond stalling for time, Mr.
Exley had few options after A.T.& T. made its initial bid.

And as time went on, his options were reduced.

Ruling by a Judge

In March, a Federal judge in Dayton threw out NCR's main line of defense, an
employee stock ownership plan, saying that it had been adopted simply to
protect
the incumbent management and that it made a mockery of shareholder rights. At
NCR's annual meeting in March, NCR shareholders voted Mr. Exley off the board,
as A.T.& T. won four seats.

The deal will add considerably to the wealth of Mr. Exley and other NCR
executives. Through stock options and direct holdings, Mr. Exley owns more
than
306,359 shares of NCR, worth nearly $34 million under terms of the deal.
Gilbert
P. Williamson, NCR's new chief executive, has stock options and holdings worth
about $11 million at the purchase price.

Mr. Exley plans to retire after the merger is complete.

A.T.& T.'s unsuccessful ventures in computers began in 1983, with the
company's investment in Ing. C. Olivetti & Company of Italy. Olivetti made a
line of personal computers for A.T.& T. that proved to be unpopular, and A.T.&
T. swapped its stake in the Italian company in 1989.

Now the fate of A.T.& T.'s own computer business is uncertain. By publicly
stating that it will turn its computer operation over to NCR's management,
A.T.&
T. has hurt morale among the 9,000 employees in its computer division.

In preparation for the acquisition, the company has trimmed 1,000 jobs in the
division since fall.

Mr. Allen would not speculate on the fate of A.T.& T.'s computer employees
yesterday.

Several months ago, A.T.& T. said it would pay bonuses to workers who
remained at their jobs for six months to discourage worried workers from
looking
for jobs outside the company.

Mr. Grubman, the analyst, said many of A.T.& T.'s computer employees would be
dismissed. "I don't think that NCR needs more people," he said. He added that
the deal made immediate financial sense for A.T.& T. because it would allow
the
company to replace its unprofitable computer operation with a profitable one.

A.T.& T. said yesterday that the acquisition would result in "one-time
material charges to A.T.& T.'s earnings."

GRAPHIC: Chronology: "Twists and Turns on the Way to a Deal"

Dec. 2, 1990: A.T.& T. offered to buy NCR for $6 billion, in a renewed effort
to
become a power in computers. The offer amounted to $90 a share, 60 percent
above
NCR's last closing price.

Dec. 3: NCR stock jumped 43.6 percent , to $81.50.

Dec. 5: A.T.& T. announced a $90-a-share hostile cash tender offer for NCR
after
the computer maker's board rejected A.T.& T.'s stock bid.

Dec. 6: A.T.& T. said Chemical Bank would lead a syndicate to raise the money
to
finance the deal.

Dec. 10: More than 50 banks agreed to provide financing to A.T.& T.

Dec. 14: Announcing that its directors had unanimously rejected the tender
offer, NCR called the bid "grossly inadequate and unfair."

Dec. 16: A.T.& T. said it would mount a proxy fight to unseat the NCR board.

Jan. 16: A.T.& T. reported that it had received tenders for about 70 percent
of
NCR's common stock.

Feb. 21: NCR created an employee stock ownership plan to help it fend off the
takeover. The plan would put 8 percent of the company's stock in friendly
hands.
NCR amended its bylaws so it could increase the size of its board.

March 10: A.T.& T. said it was willing to raise its offer to $100 a share if
NCR
would frop its objections to the deal.

March 19: Federal Judge Herbert Rice ruled against the employee stock
ownership
plan proposed by NCR. A.T.& T. said it would raise its offer if NCR
shareholders
voted to remove the board.

March 25: In an effort to negotiate a friendly end to the takeover bid, the
companies' chairmen, Charles E. Exley Jr. of NCR and Robert E. Allen of A.T.&
T., met for five hours. No agreements were announced.

March 26: Talks broke down and the prospects of a quick resolution diminished
as
the two sides offered vastly different portrayals of the previous day's
meeting.
A.T.& T. said it would press "vigorously ahead" with its proxy contest. NCR's
chairman said he was willing to continue discussions.

March 27: NCR told A.T.& T. it would agree to be bought for $110 a share,
according to the phone company's statement. A.T.& T. rejected the offer.

March 28: A.T.& T. captured four seats on NCR's board, including those held by
Gilbert Williamson, NCR's president, and Mr. Exley, but fell short of its goal
of replacing the entire board. Executives at both companies said that
negotiations would continue and that a meeting of minds was possible.

April 5: Negotiations appreared to be at an impasse after a week of meetings.

April 21: A.T.& T. said it was willing to raise its bid to $110 a share,
provided it could qualify for favorable accounting treatment and pay for the
deal with its own stock.

April 23: NCR said it was prepared to accept the new offer if its shareholders
were protected from a drop in A.T.& T.'s share price.

April 28: NCR expanded its board by two members, reseating Mr. Exley and Mr.
Williamson.

May 6: After more than five months of talks, NCR accepted an all-stock bid at
$110 a share. (pg. D6)

Graphs: "The Combination" shows the breakdown of 1990 revenues of A.T.&T. and
NCR, in billions of dollars. (Source: Company reports) (pg. D6)

Daily close of NCR shares on N.Y.S.E., Dec. 1990-April 1991 (Pg. D6)

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: May 7, 1991

40 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 Bergen Record Corp.

The Record

May 7, 1991; TUESDAY; ALL EDITIONS

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. C01

LENGTH: 746 words

HEADLINE: IT'S A CONNECTION;

AT&T FINALLY LANDS COMPUTER MAKER NCR
A POOLING OF INTERESTS?

BYLINE: Dan Woods, Record Staff Writer

BODY:

Accountants and regulators, rather than engineers and salesmen,
will probably determine whether AT&T's purchase of NCR will be an
immediate success.

The American Telephone & Telegraph Co. wants to classify its
purchase of NCR Corp. as a friendly stock swap, eligible for treatment
as a "pooling-of-interest" merger, as if the two had been operating
together all along.

Under this method, NCR shareholders won't have to pay taxes on
their profits. And AT&T will avoid huge "goodwill" write-offs, which
would hurt its earnings for at least 10 years.

"Pooling is very important to the success of the merger," said
Joanne C. Smith, an analyst at Nomura Research Institute in New York.

"NCR doesn't cost AT&T very much if they use pooling. And if AT&T
doesn't use pooling, it's going to cut them back to levels of earnings
that they made in 1989."

The federal Securities and Exchange Commission will settle the
issue, balancing pressure from the companies with its skeptical view of
pooling and Treasury Department concerns about millions in lost tax
revenue.

The SEC generally prefers "purchase accounting," in which the buyer
pays cash or securities for the acquired company's assets. Analysts say
the SEC likes this method because clear valuation of assets gives
investors a good idea of what a company is worth.

If purchase accounting were used, AT&T would pay NCR shareholders
$ 7.4 billion, 40 percent in cash and 60 percent in stock, subject to
an agreement guaranteeing NCR shareholders a minimum price.

Accountants would then sift through NCR's $ 1.8 billion of assets on
NCR's books and determine the fair market value of the assets, which is
probably higher than $ 1.8 billion.

The difference between the purchase price and the market value is
put on AT&T's books as "goodwill", an intangible asset that takes into
account the value added to a business as a result of reputation,
patronage, and the like.

Smith estimates that a maximum $ 5.6 billion in goodwill will have
to be written off against earnings if purchase accounting is used,
dropping earnings by about 55 cents per share. Under pooling, she said,
AT&T will probably see earnings drop only 10 cents a share.

If the merger were accounted for as a pooling of interests, AT&T
would simply add the $ 1.8 billion in assets on NCR's books onto its own
books. NCR shareholders would get $ 7.4 billion worth of AT&T stock, and
NCR shareholders would not have to pay taxes on the rise in their shares
until the shares were sold.

But in its attempt to wriggle free from AT&T's embrace, NCR,
through antitakeover measures, may have unwittingly prevented the use of
pooling of interests. Because of these moves, the SEC may disqualify the
deal from using pooling-of-interest accounting.

But analyst John S. Bain, who works for the Raymond James
securities firm in Florida, said the SEC will probably allow the pooling
to go through, albeit reluctantly. He said the SEC dislikes the
antitakeover measures NCR used to fend off AT&T much more than pooling.

Chart, page C01

THE LONG ROAD TO A DEAL

Dec. 2: AT&T offers to buy NCR for $ 90-a-share in stock, after NCR
rejected an earlier bid made privately.

Dec. 5: NCR opposes a takeover but says it would talk if AT&T offered
$ 125 a share, or $ 8.5 billion. AT&T announces a $ 90-a-share cash tender
offer to NCR stockholders
Dec. 16: Two days after NCR rejects the bid, AT&T asks NCR shareholders
to hold a special meeting to vote on removing NCR's board.

March 19: A judge kills NCR's plan to give employees more votes at the
meeting. AT&T promises $ 100 a share in cash if NCR's board is ousted.

March 24: NCR's board authorizes a merger at above $ 100 a share. Talks
fail to reach a deal.

March 28: AT&T wins four board seats at a special NCR shareholders
meeting, but fails in an effort to oust the entire board, which would
have easily paved the way for a takeover. AT&T gets some negotiating
leverage.

April 19: AT&T boosts its takeover offer to $ 110 a share, NCR's minimum
asking price, and changes the terms from a cash purchase to a stock
swap.

April 22: NCR suggests it could accept if shareholders are assured
they'll get the stock equivalent of $ 110 a share, even if AT&T's stock
value falls.

May 1: AT&T representatives take their four seats on NCR's board.

May 6: AT&T and NCR agree to merge.

GRAPHIC: telephone giant into the top ranks of the computer industry.
(2)Gilbert P. Williamson, CEO of the computer unit
CHART - THE LONG ROAD TO A DEAL

LANGUAGE: English

LOAD-DATE: October 2, 1995

66 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The Washington Post

The Washington Post

March 19, 1991, Tuesday, Final Edition

SECTION: FINANCIAL; PAGE D3; ALLAN SLOAN

LENGTH: 805 words

HEADLINE: NCR's Little-Noticed Ploy to Avoid the Clutches of AT&T

SERIES: Occasional

BYLINE: ALLAN SLOAN

BODY:

Watching NCR Corp. trying to escape from AT&T's hostile tender offer is like
watching a guerrilla force setting booby traps to blow up in the enemy's face.
It can't win on a conventional battlefield, so it uses tricks.

NCR's latest corporate punji stick is a little-noticed dividend that seems
likely to reduce AT&T's reported profits by $ 5 billion should American
Telephone & Telegraph Co. succeed in taking over NCR.

The NCR maneuver is marvelously innovative. It's also incredibly sleazy,
given the fact that holders of two-thirds of NCR's stock have tendered their
shares to AT&T, which is offering $ 90 a share and says it will go higher if
NCR
agrees to be bought. AT&T hasn't bought the tendered shares because of NCR's
defenses.

The booby trap is a special $ 1 a share dividend that NCR announced on Feb.
21, and that is scheduled to be paid tomorrow. NCR says the dividend is
designed
to put money in the hands of its shareholders. AT&T's minions say
confidentially
that the dividend's real purpose is to poison AT&T's earnings statement if it
buys NCR. The leakers' goal: to get enough NCR stockholders angry enough to
pressure NCR's board to cancel the dividend.

Why haven't you heard about this dividend before? Because NCR announced it
the same day that it unveiled a more obvious booby trap, an abusive employee
stock ownership plan that AT&T is challenging in court. People homed in
instead
on the ESOP, which gives NCR employees 8 percent of NCR's voting power, making
it virtually impossible for AT&T to get the 80 percent majority vote it needs
to
oust NCR's board at a special meeting set for March 28.

Should the dividend be paid, it will almost surely stop AT&T from using a
special accounting method called "pooling of interests" if it buys NCR. If
AT&T
can't use pooling, its earnings will take a tremendous bath. But pooling is
hard
to come by. You must meet 12 criteria, which take 22 pages to outline. Miss
one
criterion, and you're all wet.

"If the dividend is paid, it would be very unlikely that AT&T could get
pooling treatment," says Robert Willens, Lehman Brothers Inc.'s resident tax
and
accounting expert. Willens's firm isn't involved in this deal.

The ultimate arbiter of pooling, the Securities and Exchange Commission,
declined comment.

Here's what's at stake. Let's say that AT&T buys NCR for $ 7 billion, or $
105 a share. If you pool, you add AT&T's profits to NCR's. So last year, the
AT&T-NCR combo would have earned $ 3.1 billion -- AT&T's $ 2.7 billion and
NCR's
$ 360 million. If there were no pooling, AT&T-NCR would have earned around $
2.6
billion -- less than AT&T made without NCR.

Here's why. NCR's tangible net worth -- the value of its plants, real estate
and other things you can see and touch -- is about $ 2 billion. The other $ 5
billion AT&T would pay is for non-tangible assets like NCR's work force and
its
technology. If AT&T can't use pooling, it has to charge its earnings for the
$ 5
billion it paid for NCR's non-tangible assets.

Normally, you get up to 40 years to write off the non-tangibles. Willens
estimates that because computer technology changes so rapidly, AT&T would have
to write off the $ 5 billion over no more than 10 years. That works out to $
500
million a year.

Even though the $ 500 million charge isn't real money -- it requires no cash
outlay and is purely an accounting item -- AT&T will think twice before
throwing
$ 500 million a year of profit out the window. The more NCR can sabotage
AT&T's
accounting, the less AT&T can offer for NCR. And the greater chance NCR has of
staying independent, even though shareholders have overwhelmingly voted to
sell.

This doesn't mean, by the way, that if AT&T can't do pooling, it will walk
away from NCR. The fact that AT&T has made a cash offer -- you can't pool if
you
buy a company for cash -- shows that it's willing to buy NCR without pooling.
Logic suggests, however, that AT&T would offer more money if it can pool than
it
will offer if it can't.

I happen to believe, as NCR Chairman Charles Exley Jr. does, that AT&T will
mess up NCR should its takeover attempt succeed. But Exley has undermined
NCR's
claim to the moral high ground by saying that he would listen to a $ 125 a
share
offer. Of course, his latest ploy is designed to make sure that AT&T can't
offer
that much, or anything close to it.

I asked NCR about the dividend, trying to see if I was missing something.
NCR's answer, read to me by a public relations person, consisted of legalese.
The gist of it: The dividend compensates NCR holders for the fact that the
AT&T
tender offer has stopped NCR from buying its own shares on the open market.
There was "no other reason," the PR man said.

Right. And if you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.

Allan Sloan is a columnist for Newsday in New York.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH


right back at you


Here is what I submitted:

Date filed:		Amount:
11/28/01		$949.39
11/6/01			$21,010.15
10/4/01			$3,319.40
8/15/01			$4,069.72 (this the check that bounced)

I think I deleted my original message I sent but I will send another one just to insure they did get it.

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


Clem called wanting to speak to someone about the guaranty issue.  Who should
I direct him to?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 09:08 AM -----

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	09/15/2000 05:39 PM

		 To: Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement
Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Andre
Templeman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: dpef@blakes.com
		 Subject: Alberta PPA Financing

I thought I might try to sum up.  It seems to me that we both need to
finalize the structure as well as co-ordinate across various groups such that
we all know what each is doing with the view to funding on time by the end of
next week.

1. As soon as possible next week (i.e. Monday) we need to finalize the swap
structure including the credit and covenant package.

2. If there is not already a Term Sheet in place, it may be useful to have
one prepared.  Frankly, it seems from my various discussions with Global
Finance, Credit, Origination, Enron Corp., Royal Bank of Canada and its
external counsel and our external counsel, that there are certain agreements,
documents, deliverables and covenants that are being expected by, or
exchanged between, the parties, but which are not being communicated among
each other and we are therefore working at cross purposes.  Frankly, unless
and until we know what the structure is to look like, what the credit and
financial covenants are to look like, and what the documentation expectations
are, it is difficult if not  impossible to prepare documentation.  For
example:

 (a) I had a confusing conversation with the Bank as to the form of Guarantee
they were expecting from Enron Corp.  I was trying to require the Bank to
accept an Enron Corp. standard form Guarantee, whereas the Bank was looking
for a long form Guarantee that includes the covenants, representations and
warranties of Enron Corp. in its revolving credit facilities.  Based upon
this disagreement, I left a message for Clement to the effect that we may
have a problem to resolve.  However, Clement was kind enough to advise me by
voice mail that in fact Enron Corp. does not have a problem with giving a
long form Guarantee of this nature and that the form of Guarantee had in fact
been provided (by whom I'm not sure) to the Bank.

 (b) The Bank was enquiring as to what would be the governing law of the
Enron Corp. Guarantee, to which I advised it would be Texas law.  However, I
now understand there may be some agreement (by whom I'm not sure) to have the
Enron Corp. Guarantee governed by New York law.

 (c) In any event, I understand that the Bank will be looking for a form of
enforceability opinion from Enron Corp.'s outside legal counsel with respect
to the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the Enron
Corp. Guarantee, as well as certain conflicts of laws opinions with respect
to the governing law of the Guarantee (Texas/New York) being enforceable.

 (d) In my discussions with the Bank this afternoon, it also became aware to
me that the Bank is expecting external counsel legal opinions with respect to
Enron Canada.  Blake, Cassels & Graydon is prepared to provide those legal
opinions.

 (e) As noted above, I have discussed with the Bank that the governing law of
the underlying swap documents would be Alberta, to which they seemed fine.  I
suggested that Ontario law would also be acceptable.

 (f) I assume that Enron Canada ought to obtain legal opinions from the
Bank's external counsel with respect to the documents and obligations of
Swapco (and perhaps even the Bank), but I will need to have this confirmed.

 (g) It came to my attention during my conversations with the Bank this
afternoon that Swapco (or financing SPV) is unaffiliated to the Bank.  This
presents problems as, I understand for accounting purposes, the two swaps
involving Enron Canada cannot be linked, for example by cross-defaults.  At
the same time unaffiliated exposures under de-linked transactions may not be
capable of being set-off.  We undertook to attempt to remedy this situation
through broadening the set-off concepts under the ISDA Master Agreements.

 (h) I do not think the Bank frankly (nor anyone else) has a firm grasp on
the credit/collateralization/margin requirements, which I think is dependent
upon a final understanding of the swap structure.

 (i) From my discussions with the Bank, it seemed to me that they were not
clear as to how their fees and costs would be repaid through the swap
structure.  Although it might be as simple as adding these amounts to the
principal amount of the swaps, I suggested that the Bank prepare a separate
"fee letter" to recover its fees.  More problematically, the Bank was not
clear as to how "increased costs" would be accounted for in the swap
structure.  Generally speaking, a Bank credit agreement contains provisions
that if there are increased costs of funding to the Bank as a result of a
change in Bank regulations or lending or reserve requirements, those
increased costs are flowed through.  They were not sure how this could be
accommodated in a swap structure.  I suggested that there may be some way to
fix this through a price adjustment mechanism in the fixed price or volumes
or through a separate indemnification in the "fee letter".

 (j) The Bank is anxious to see paper, and I am not sure who is preparing the
paper and consolidating it in a distribution package to the Bank.  For
example, I think a package that includes all of the swap Master Agreements
and related documentation (which I believe Mark T's group will prepare in
Houston), the Enron Corp. Guarantee (which I've indicated above seems to have
already been provided in draft to the Bank) and all other documentation needs
to be sent to the Bank as soon as possible, as well as to Blake, Cassels &
Graydon and Vinson and Elkins if they are to be giving legal opinions to the
Bank in connection with the transaction.  Of course this depends on
finalization of the structure as well as the credit and other covenants
package.  In concept, I have told the Bank, and I believe the Bank agrees,
that the form of the ISDA Master and related documentation would be the same
as the form of ISDA Master which currently exists between ENA and Royal Bank
of Canada, and the Bank asked that they at least be provided with that paper
as soon as possible.  Perhaps Tana could look after delivering that as soon
as possible, if not this afternoon, Monday morning.

Frankly, I think this project, if it is to get funded on time, needs a
measure of co-ordination and communication of internal and external
expectations.  It may be worthwhile to convene a conference call with all
relevant groups (i.e. Legal/Global Finance/Credit/Origination) on Monday
morning.

Regards,
Peter


In an effort to keep you informed of the progress at Enron Field, we have
organized monthly tours for all Executive Committee members.  These tours
will take place once a month, and will last approximately one hour.   We hope
that you will make time to tour the stadium, as it will provide you with the
opportunity to ask questions and experience the progress of Enron Field first
hand.

Please mark your calanders, as these tour dates have been confirmed with the
Astros and Brown & Root.  They are as follows:

- October 29, 1999
- December 3, 1999
- January 7, 2000
- February 4, 2000
- March 4, 1999

All tours are schedule for 4:00 p.m., and transportation will be provided for
you.  One week prior to each tour date, we will send a reminder with specific
details pertaining to each tour.  At that time, we will ask for confirmation
of your attendance - so we may handle all logistical issues with the
appropriate parties.

Again, we look forward to your attendance at these tours, as they promise to
be extremely informative.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you.

David Tagliarino (x3-7883)


A reminder:  900am Monday, my office.  3882

We need the spread sheet on the transformer payments, please.

Thanks,

Kay


...okay, maybe it's not THAT good but it's cooked and the beer is plentiful.

Hey everyone,

Just wanted to test the waters and see what kind of interest there was in
doing Steak Night tomorrow night at Little Woodrows.  I feel like it's been a
while since we really rallied the troops and I know I have personally missed
the interaction.  It's also been a while since we've attempted to solve the
worlds problems over cold Shiner and I think the world may be the worse for
it.  So, get back to me and let me know if anyone's up for an evening of
eating, drinking and most definitely being merry.  If it looks like 'a go',
I'll shoot everyone a follow-up email complete with ETA.

The one and only,

sscott5

"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace
for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting
started."


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041312.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


541200
541201
broker says these are not his deals.


Alan,

I am still pulling together info on PG&E's resources/generation.  Once I have
that assembled, I will incorporate it in the model along with the UMFOR data
on SCE that you sent me.  Meantime, this is roughly the same version of the
model that you already have.  It may represent an update from one I had sent
to Tim and Jeff earlier, however.  If anyone has any questions, feel free to
give me a call.


Please find attached our Weekly Report (10th August 2000) for your perusal
and information.

Regards,

Beverley


Attached is the above referenced document.  Please note, the obligation of
the Operator to make short fall loans has expired and has been removed.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3817
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


in my car


Start Date: 4/3/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040322.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These changes
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successful
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe.
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton,s departure, the ability to
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromising
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yielding
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension of
Enron,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries and
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron,s Net Works business unit
as well as a new unit ) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron,s merchant
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assume
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadership
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibility
for managing all of Enron,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of North
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for the
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region
will report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office of
the Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for
Enron,s wholesale energy business in India and will transition this business
into Enron Global Assets in the near future.

Diomedes Christodoulou, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, has joined
EBS as Chief Commercial Officer.  Diomedes will be located in London and will
focus his origination activities on global opportunities, with near term
attention to the wholesale and enterprise sectors.  Diomedes will report to
the EBS Office of the Chairman.

Jim Bannantine, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, will be joining EES
to lead EES, commercial efforts outside North America and Europe.  In order
to ensure a smooth transition for our South American businesses and to
facilitate our asset sales activities, Jim will remain in South America for
at least the next several months and continue to serve as CEO of Enron South
America.  Throughout the transition, Jim will report to Cliff Baxter and to
the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale Services.  Following the
transition, Jim will join EES.

In addition to these changes in our international asset operations
activities, we are making the following changes in our merchant wholesale
businesses and the commercial support functions:

Enron Net Works
Louise Kitchen will assume Greg,s previous responsibilities as President and
CEO of Enron Net Works, reporting into Mark and Greg.

Enron Americas
Concurrent with the transfer to Enron Global Assets of responsibility for
operating Enron,s South and Central America asset base, all trading,
marketing, and new asset development activities in these regions will report
into a new entity, Enron Americas.  Enron Americas will have responsibility
for all wholesale merchant businesses across North, Central and South
America.  Dave Delainey, President and CEO, and John Lavorato, Chief
Operating Officer will comprise the Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas.

Enron Europe
The Enron Europe organization, which includes Enron,s businesses in Australia
and Japan, and Enron Metals, remains unchanged under the leadership of John
Sherriff, President and CEO, and Michael Brown, Chief Operating Officer.

Enron Global Markets
Enron Global Markets, under the leadership of Mike McConnell, President and
CEO, and Jeff Shankman, Chief Operating Officer, will continue to have
responsibility for Enron,s Middle East and LNG operations.  With the
exception of Ecoelectrica in Puerto Rico, all operating power plants and
associated personnel in the Caribbean and Central America will transfer to
Enron Global Assets.  Enron Global Markets will also continue to manage the
commodity businesses in crude and products, coal, weather, insurance,
equities, interest rates, foreign exchange, and agricultural products.

Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Industrial Markets, organization, under the leadership of Jeff McMahon,
President & CEO, and Ray Bowen, Chief Operating Officer, remains unchanged.

Commercial Support for EWS
The commercial support functions for EWS will remain with, and be managed by,
the individual business units.  We are creating no incremental overhead in
the creation of EWS, and in fact hope to reduce our operating costs by more
efficient utilization and sharing of resources across EWS.

To this end we have asked several people to take on an expanded role across
EWS in addition to their ongoing roles within their business units.  These
newly defined roles are as follows:

Mid and Back Office Operations ) Sally Beck will lead Mid and Back Office
Operations across EWS.  These services will become part of Enron Net Works,
with Sally reporting to Louise Kitchen and Rick Causey, Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer.  This alignment creates a coordinated
services organization with IT and e-commerce platforms to support the
wholesale businesses and to maximize opportunities to commercialize these
services.  Mid and Back Office services for all commercial activities will
continue to be organized with dedicated operations controllers responsible
for specific commodities and/or geographic locations.
Legal ) Mark Haedicke will serve in the role of General Counsel for EWS.
Regulatory and Government Affairs ) This function will remain organized on a
regional basis.  Rick Shapiro will support all EWS businesses operating in
the Americas, and Mark Schroeder, who is based in London, will support all
European and Eastern Hemisphere operations.  Rick and Mark will also continue
to support all other Enron businesses operating in their respective regions
and will continue to report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and Chief
of Staff.
Public Relations ) This function is also organized primarily on a regional
basis.  Eric Thode will have responsibility for North American activity,
Enron Net Works, and Enron Industrial Markets.  Jackie Gentle will continue
in her role for Enron Europe (including Japan and Australia) and John Ambler
will have responsibility for activity outside North America and Europe as
well as providing support for Enron Global Markets and Enron Global Assets.
These individuals will also continue to have a split reporting relationship
to Mark Palmer, Vice President of Communications.
Business Analysis and Reporting ) Wes Colwell will expand his role to cover
EWS reporting in addition to his current role in North America.

Attached for your review is an organization chart for Enron Wholesale
Services which summarizes the changes described here.  As this organization
continues to evolve we will keep you informed of any additional changes.

ENRON GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
AND ENRON WIND

 As part of our company-wide initiative to examine our assets and investments
around the world, we are considering a variety of options with respect to
EGEP and EWC.  As a consequence, we are putting these businesses under Cliff
Baxter,s direction.  Jeff Sherrick, CEO of EGEP, and Jim Noles, CEO of Enron
Wind, will report to Cliff.

CORPORATE STAFF

 We are consolidating the corporate staff functions: Human Resources,
Government Affairs, Public Relations/Communications and Administration.  In
that regard, Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President of Human Resources and
Community Relations, will report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and
Chief of Staff.

COMMITTEE STRUCTURE

 In light of the increased leadership opportunities created by Enron,s
growth, the Executive Committee will be expanded to include more of our
business unit leaders.  The primary role of this committee will continue to
be the communication of relevant information across Enron,s businesses and
the coordination of activities across those businesses.  We will also be
drawing on this group to lead company-wide initiatives such as the
performance review process and evaluation and creation of new businesses.
The Executive Committee membership is shown on the attached list.

 We are also forming a new committee ) the Enron Corporate Policy Committee.
This group will be responsible for overall corporate policy, personnel
management policy and corporate strategy.  The Enron Corporate Policy
Committee membership is also shown on the attached list.

 We are confident that these changes will align our talent and our capital to
our highest return opportunities.  Please join us in congratulating and
supporting all of these individuals in their new roles.


Kerry,

Based upon your review of the attached, is there any way that one of our
subsidiaries could decline to include bargaining unit personnel in receipt of
this benefit?  Let me know asap.

Thanks a lot!

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 05:08
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           01/24/2000
10:06 AM

To: All Enron-Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Over $50 -- You made it happen!

On Wall Street, people are talking about Enron.  At Enron, we're talking
about people...our people.  You are the driving force behind every success
that our company has experienced, including our high-performing stock price,
which surpassed the $50 mark only a few days ago. You made it happen!

To show our appreciation for your hard work and commitment to Enron,s
continued success, eligible regular full-time and regular part-time employees
who were on the payroll of a wholly-owned Enron company at Dec. 31, 1999 will
receive 50 Enron stock options.  A special stock option award certificate and
a copy of the stock plan will be sent to you in the next few weeks.

About the stock options grant:
? The grant was effective Jan. 18, 2000, therefore, the option grant price is
$55.50.
? Options will have a seven-year term, which means you must exercise these
options before seven years have passed.
? Options will vest 25 percent on Feb. 28, 2000 and 25 percent each
subsequent January 18th thereafter until fully vested, as long as you are an
employee of Enron.  This means you may exercise 25 percent of these options
as early as Feb. 28.
? This grant is made in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Enron
Corp. Stock Plans and the award documents, which you will receive in the
coming weeks.

Due to varying international restrictions and legalities, Enron employees in
certain international locations will receive some other form of recognition.
Your local management and human resources representative will communicate
further details.

Visit home.enron.com for additional information.  There you can access a list
of frequently asked questions regarding stock options.  And you can view a
special message from Ken Lay.  To access the special message, you must have
IP-TV and a sound card. If you are not able to view Ken,s message, a
transcript is available.  If you encounter any technical difficulties, please
contact your PC Help Desk.

Again, thank you for all you do to make Enron a successful global energy and
broadband services company and a great place to work.


Dan

For what its worth (given that HPL is about to leave the Enron fold and I'll
have to start all over with AEP's credit group!!), Roche would accept the GTC
execpt the crucial part about collateral threshold and suggest the below
language.

Comments??

Lee

---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001
12:27 PM ---------------------------

"Radigan, William J {Purc~Parsippany}" <WILLIAM_J.RADIGAN@ROCHE.COM> on
05/29/2001 04:41:05 PM
To: "'Lee.L.Papayoti@enron.com'" <Lee.L.Papayoti@enron.com>
cc: "Griffith, Bob {PROC~Freeport}" <BOB.GRIFFITH@ROCHE.COM>
Subject: RE: Proposed contract language

Lee,
We presently have approved the following paragraph in regards to hedging
responsibility with another one of our natural gas suppliers with whom we
lock in prices through Futures buying.? Would this paragraph be acceptable in
lieu of your article 12 in HPL's Terms and Conditions??

Bill

Financial Responsibility: In the event that in HPL's sole, but good faith,
business judgment, exercised in a manner consistent with general commercial
standards, HPL has reasonable grounds for insecurity of RVI's ability to
perform its obligations under this Agreement, HPL may demand adequate
assurance of performance from RVI.? Adequate assurance shall mean, but not be
limited to, sufficient security in a form, for a term, and in an amount
reasonably acceptable to HPL, including, but not limited to, a standby
irrevocable letter of credit.? If RVI fails to deliver such adequate
assurance within ten (10) business days following receipt of a written
request by HPL, then RVI shall be considered to be in default of this
Agreement. Similarly, in the event that in RVI's sole, but good faith,
business judgment, exercised in a manner consistent with general commercial
standards, RVI has reasonable grounds for insecurity of HPL's ability to
perform its obligations under this Agreement, RVI may demand adequate
assurance of performance from HPL.? Adequate assurance shall mean, but not be
limited to, sufficient security in a form, for a term, and in an amount
reasonably acceptable to RVI, including, but not limited to, a standby
irrevocable letter of credit.? If HPL fails to deliver such adequate
assurance within ten (10) business days following receipt of a written
request by RVI, then HPL shall be considered to be in default of this
Agreement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee.L.Papayoti@enron.com [mailto:Lee.L.Papayoti@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Wiilliam Radigan
Cc: Bob Griffith
Subject: Proposed contract language

Mr. Radigan

We have developed the language that is required to be able to enter into a
fixed price transaction for the Freeport Plant.

Because our existing physical contract is an older format, it proved to be
cumbersome to modify it.? Therefore, we would enter into a new agreement
for the fixed price volume as follows:

(See attached file: roche-gtc-2001-049crfm.doc)

Any volumes over the fixed price volumes would continue to flow under the
existing agreement.? The new contract would be the first volumes through
the meter.

Please call to dicsuss after you have had a chance to review.

Lee Papayoti


Good Evening:

Attached is a copy of my attempt to reflect our discussions today.  In
reviewing the discussion notes, it appears that we're expanding, rather
than limiting, the number of unresolved points.

Perhaps we'll all feel more inclined toward agreement tomorrow.

Evie

 - Draft Issues Outline 061801 (Redline 061401).doc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Re-validation Mtg w/Sheila, Ramona & others - 4102

Date:		10/11/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dear Louise-

Just wanted to pass a bit of information along that made me proud....

My informational webmaps are the most visited sites of all the Fundy's web sites.  In fact we have three of the top seven sites!!!!

WOO HOO!!!

Julie  :-)


Jackie,

This is the spot deal we talked about last week.  Craig Falbaum is working on
negotiating a price.

D

Jackie Young
01/24/2000 11:03 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 98-6725 (Deal Needs To Begin At 1st of Month {1/1/2000})

Daren,

The above mentioned receipt meter is on the 215K (Sitara #152638) beginning
the 21st day of January 2000.  The actual flow date @ this meter began on
January 1.  Can you please show the start-date in Sitara as 1/1/2000?

I don't know if this information is of any help but 12/99's business @ this
meter was on the 215K as well.

Thanks.

-Jackie-
3-9497


Dede,
I'd also like to participate, and 2pm Houston time is fine for me.

Nicole Daggs
Legal
Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP
678-579-6900

-----Original Message-----
From: ntrask@pwrteam.com [mailto:ntrask@pwrteam.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Tillett, Nina
Cc: david.perlman@powersrc.com; elizabeth.sager@enron.com;
fmdutton@aep.com; nicole.daggs@mirant.com
Subject: Re: "Into" Products

Dede,

If you do have a conference call, I'd like to participate.  The time you
suggest is fine for me.

Thanks,

Noel

Noel Trask
Exelon Power Team
300 Exelon Way
Kennett Square, PA 19348
Phone: 610-765-6649
FAX: 610-765-7649

                    "Tillett,

                    Nina"                To:     <fmdutton@aep.com>

                    <NTillett@reli       cc:
<david.perlman@powersrc.com>, <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>,
                    ant.com>              <ntrask@pwrteam.com>,
<nicole.daggs@mirant.com>
                                         Subject:     "Into" Products

                    11/14/2001

                    06:23 PM

           This is a reminder to Mitch that he is going to draft some
language for our "going forward" transactions dealing with anticipated
changes to "into" obligations.  GO MITCH GO!

           I met with our traders today and I am sure of only one thing --
it's a mess.  Mitch - if you're not ready to draft, we should maybe just
set up a conference call next week to discuss.  If so, can we do it
Monday, 11/19 between  2 p.m. and 3 p.m. (Houston time)?

Dede Russo
Reliant Resources Legal Department
P.O. Box 1384
Houston, TX  77251-1384
(713) 207-5240
(713) 207-0161 (fax)
drusso@reliant.com

The preceding e-mail message contains information that is confidential,
may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges,
and may constitute non-public information.  It is intended to be
conveyed only to the designated recipient's).  If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please do not read, copy or disclose
the contents of this communication to others and please notify the
sender at (713) 207-3331.  If you are not the intended recipient, we
would appreciate your forwarding the message back to us and deleting it
from your system.  Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Thank you.

****************************************************************************
******************
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Generation Company

proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
copyright
belonging to the Exelon family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended solely
for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If you are
not the
intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If
you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any
printout.

Thank You.
****************************************************************************
*****************


Thanks Vince.  This is great.

By the way, did you get copies of the journal with our paper?

John

At 04:59 PM 3/23/01 -0600, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>No problem.
>I look forward to it.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 03/23/2001 09:04:44 AM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Request
>
>
>Vince,
>
>Would you mind making a few luncheon comments to the Texas Finance Festival
>group at our sat luncheon?  I struck out with Andy and Sheridan thought
>that you could relate very well to the group.  How about it?
>
>John
>
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


hi Matt,
Just checked our voice mail at home. call me at work today at 303-355-7653.
we very rarely check the voice mail at home. you can always  leave a message
on our car phones as they roll over to the office
love Mom


Attached is an agenda for the business meeting with Crescendo this Thursday.
We will be meeting 9:00am to 1:00pm.  Due to a tight time schedule, lunch
will be brought in.  Please let me know today if you will be in the meeting
during lunch.

Mark Whitt, if you want to call in or have us call you for any portion of it,
please let me know.

Thanks,
Mark Castiglione


Henry is a code name.  It happen to both of us this pass week/weekend.

>>> <Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com> 11/26 11:19 AM >>>
You are so nasty!!!!!!! Who is Henry (that get's on your nerves)? I can
take a breather anytime now.  I have an 11:45 meeting today and then after
that, it's just wait and see.   I am thrilled for you, you deserve
everything you're receiving now and so much more!!!

I too am very glad to be your friend...I only wished that we lived in the
same city and could visit more often.  When God put us together, he knew
what he was doing, AS ALWAYS!

I love you my sister.

Also, you need to be careful on the e-mail and use code words, if you know
what I mean.  You know I know how to READ!!!

Love ya!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Valada Brawner" <VBrawne@nicor.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 10:15 AM
   To:     pmims@enron.com
   Subject:  Friends for Life

   I want to say that I am very thankful that the Lord has blessed you to
   be apart of my life.

   Let me know what happens to you, on today.  You have soooooo much
   experience that you can go anywhere.  If I can be of some help let me
   know.

   Patrice I really Love Ron.  My sister-in-law say my eyes were beaming.
   I was a good girl.  Henry gets on my nerve sometimes.  I was running
   late this morning, therefore I did not have enough time this morning.
   It would have been oooonnnnnn.  There is so much I would like to
   disclose to you on today.  I know other things are on your mind.  Let me
   know when you can take a breathier.  Your brother man is trying to act
   right, but, I am playing hard ball.  I need to go to Tex, and Denver.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hi Folks,

Lots of email pouring in on these guys so I wanted to share the latest here:

Griese "Questionable" But Should Start

Entire Story:   http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2001/1012/1263238.html

DENVER -- After missing most of Thursday's practice with a sore throwing
shoulder, Denver Broncos quarterback Brian Griese was a full participant in
Friday's workout and was expected to start on Sunday in Seattle.

The Broncos added Griese to their injury report on Friday morning, listing
him as questionable.

An hour later, however, Griese had no obvious discomfort during a 75-minute
workout. Coach Mike Shanahan said he was confident that, barring any
setbacks, Griese will play against the Seahawks.

Griese has had surgery twice on his shoulder, after the 1999 and 2000
seasons.

Shanahan said Griese reported soreness in his shoulder after Sunday's 20-6
win over Kansas City. The injury likely occurred in the first half, since
Griese threw only five passes after intermission. For the game, he was
11-of-20 for 121 yards with one touchdown and one interception.

"It was sore after the game, but we didn't think it was anything that would
keep him from playing," Shanahan said Friday. "He couldn't practice
(Thursday). He just took a few reps and it was sore. That's why we put him
on the questionable list. I wasn't really sure where we'd be at (Friday).

"But he was able to make it through practice and he was effective. So if
there's no setback, then he'll be able to go Sunday."

If Griese had been unable to practice Friday, Shanahan said, the Broncos
would have prepared backup Gus Frerotte for a starting role.

"If you don't practice Thursday and Friday, then you don't start," Shanahan
said. "But he was able to go through the whole practice, and he practiced
well."

[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [  OUR VIEW  ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

Scary news to see him listed but sounds like good news that he'll play.
Gotta love Shanahan making a mockery of the "Questionable" listing saying
he's confident Griese will play.   As we've been telling you since May, you
should back up your valuable skill guys in great situations with their real
backup.   It was a lot better before Ed McCaffrey's injury but Griese would
probably qualify as one of those guys in great situations.   If you (or your
arch rival) own Griese, it's a good idea that you grab Frerotte if you
haven't already.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Derrick Alexander Improving

From an interview with Dick Vermeil today on KCChiefs.com

Question: Did (WR) Derrick Alexander take a full day of reps?

VERMEIL: "Not the full amount but he did work. I asked him after practice
how he felt and he said he felt good. I don't know how long it's been since
he's said he felt good."

ESPN.com is also reporting on their Injuries page that Alexander will be
able to play this week. (although I take that page with a grain of salt)

[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [  OUR VIEW  ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

It's a risky play here.   We'd told you this week that it wasn't looking
good for Alexander's back.   He seems to be over the Achilles trouble but
the back was so stiff earlier this week he couldn't tie his shoes.   That
appears to be getting better.   Still though, he's a large risk.   I would
still shy away unless I didn't have any alternatives close to him.   A sore
back is the kind of thing that could tighten up at any time and it's just
too risky in my opinion.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

More as we hear it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
Dear  SmartReminders Member,
 Get FREE  Ghirardelli Chocolates with your Thanksgiving Bouquets...  only from Proflowers! Click Here to Order your Thanksgiving Bouquets!    What a better way to say "thanks"  to someone you love this Thanksgiving, than with flowers and chocolates!  Whether you choose the beautiful Long  Stemmed Autumn Roses , the gorgeous  Autumn Bouquet , the fabulous  Thanksgiving Bouquet , the thoughtful Home  for the Holidays Bouquet  or any of the other great bouquets, you  are assured of getting the freshest flowers, delivered directly from  the growers, at half the price!      You'll get Proflowers' 7-day  freshness guarantee and, as a special Thanksgiving Bonus, a FREE  box of delicious Ghirardelli Chocolates  with selected Thanksgiving  bouquets.      Place your order now for delivery when you specify. You can order  as late as 10pm Eastern Time on Tuesday the 20th for delivery on  Wednesday the 21st - the day before Thanksgiving! Plus you can get  automatic e-mail confirmations that tell you exactly when your flowers  are shipped and exactly when they're delivered.      Whether you want to buy flowers  for yourself or send them to someone you care about, our relationship  with Proflowers gives you the twice the freshness at half the price.      Happy  Thanksgiving!

	 Having  trouble clicking on the above offer? Please click  here instead .

We respect  your privacy and are a Certified Participant of the BBBOnLine
 Privacy Program.  To be removed from future offers,click  here.
SmartReminders.com  is a permission based service. To unsubscribe click  here .


Mark, Ron, Alaadin and Hollis:

I am uncomfortable, extremely uncomfortable, with trying to make this test
pass by using data that is not synchronized within the same period of the
test as the remaining turbines. This is not in keeping with the spirt of the
test. It is clear that we did not pass the ATP even this second time and that
the cause of our failure is the failure of the Omnitron's to provide us with
reliable data.

I wish to point this out in my weekly SCADA report to add futher backbone to
our need to replace the Omnitron switches with Hirschmann's.

Lets not spend any more effort on this particular test, but wait until we
have the Hirschmann's installed. I will speak with O&M and with our customer
about this problem.

Regards

KLC


Attached is the May 2001 "At A Glance" report. A couple of additions this month, which include a section on Capital Expenditures with Pay Backs and some analysis of the recent new hire survey that we set up. Please call if you have any questions.

DCL


I will meet with Kim this afternoon on her comments on ConfirmLogic.  Bottom
line, no sign off from Kim at this point.  Thought you might want to know.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 08:56 AM
---------------------------
   Kim S Theriot                04/17/2001 10:58 PM

To: Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update on ConfirmLogic

I wanted to give you a quick update on ConfirmLogic....

Testing was done last week on the ConfirmLogic module.  On Thursday, we
discussed with Kathryn Cordes and the ConfirmLogic IT team the items that we
had found that were "show stoppers" as far as releasing the product for Beta
Testing.  Some of the major Items found were the inability to properly handle
Basis Swaps for Gas and inability to display meaningful Index References for
Power (they were pulling in a code rather than a description of the Index).

The team worked on the "fixes" and migrated the code last night.  Today
during testing, they found that the new code had actually caused problems
with the fixed price and volume information, which was working previously.  I
talked to Kathryn and she said that the were rebuilding the code.  She said
that someone had tested the fix last night and everything worked fine.  We
plan more testing in the morning.

They are doing a high-level demo this Thursday for Beta Customers just to
introduce the module.  They were planning on having more extensive Beta demos
for each client starting next week but realize that those may have to
postponed further.

We have told them that we would not sign off for Beta testing until we were
comfortable that the items that we identified were working.  We need
consistent, stable days of testing before I will feel comfortable.

Overall, we like the "new" streamlined version of the screens and feel that
it will be a good product if they can work out the data display issues.

Call with any questions.

Kim Theriot


The attached media statement was sent out to media this evening. John Ambler
has asked me to forward the same to you fyi
regards
Jimmy


Gerald,

Any progress on the above subject?  Let me know when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Chris Hilgert
Enron Compression Services
Work: 713-853-7350
Cell:   713-857-2479
www.enron.com/compression


off of i-10


This should be 214.00 - I've changed it.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   02/22/2001 01:50 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 529368.01 Motley

Kate, can you please check price on following deal
Enron Sells to Aep     2/22/01
April 01
we have price of 114.00
ICE broker paper has price of 214.00

Thanks


yes.

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 08/25/2000 09:32:11 AM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

Is this the SOTW report you requested? NN

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 12:26 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject:

Don't forget the progress report.

Thanks,

Kay


I want to take a moment to thank each of you for having a summer Analyst or
Associate work on your team. I also want to remind everyone what a high
stakes activity this is for Enron.
Based on your recommendation, we will make offers at the end of the summer to
those interns who perform, and who you endorse as a potential future member
of your team. Those interns who have had a good experience and accept our
offer will be the lowest risk hires we make - from any source. We will have
effectively interviewed and watched them work for 2-3 months. They also have
the potential to be the most effective advocates and talent scouts we have,
when they return to campus. On the flip side, those who don't have meaningful
assignments, or have bad experiences during the summer can severely hurt our
efforts.
Thank you again for being part of this very important activity. If you have
any questions, or if areas of concern arise during the summer, please contact
Ted Bland (x35275), Traci Warner (x33242) or me (x36671).
We appreciate your contributions to this important effort for Enron.
Billy


Dear Medicine Bow Shipper:

This morning, WIC requested authorization from the FERC to place the
Medicine Bow Loop project (pipeline and compression) into service.  We
requested and anticipate approval next week, and assuming that approval, the
project will  be placed in service late next week.  Under the terms of your
Medicine Bow Loop contracts, the reservation rates and your initial first
month MDQ's will become effective December 1, 2001.  I will update you on
any developments and notify you when we have received and accepted the
approval requested above.

For Medicine Bow Lateral Shippers, your MDQ's will proceed as set forth in
your contracts, and you will see a reduction in your rate for November to
12.6 cents per dth (to reflect total MDQ's exceeding 350 Mdth/day) and for
December to 12.0 cents per dth (to reflect the Medicine Bow Loop
in-service).

Please call me if you have any questions.

Laine Lobban
719-520-4344
719-331-3379 (cell)

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Dear Tori Kuykendall,

Thank you for shopping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

The gift you selected Fresh Flower Cornucopia, will be delivered to Natalie on 11/16/01.

Below is a summary of your order :

Billing Information:

Tori Kuykendall
4419 Stackstone Ln
Katy,
TX 77450.

Shipping Information:

Natalie Baker
3824 Villanova
Houston,
TX 77005.

Card Message:

Natalie Thanks for all of the clothes and for the use of the bassinet for Erin.  We hope you and your family have a wonderful Thanksgiving.   Tori, Pat, Erin and Donna

Order Summary :
Order number is 867044300.
Product : Fresh Flower Cornucopia :    59.99
Service Charge        :    7.99
Tax(where applicable) :    5.61
Total Charge          :   73.59

If you have any questions, please feel free to e-mail us at customerservice@1800flowers.com, visit our online Customer Service Chat, or registered users can use our on-line order tracking.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Director of Customer Service
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

You're on your way to special savings at CDNOW.com.  To get 15% OFF your next online purchase of $9.99 or more, click the link below:

http://cdnow.com/from=btk:h:8fl:test


It is Paige's 21st today (YIKES)  I'll be back Monday


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 November 2001 	[IMAGE]

   Mileage Statement   [IMAGE]  Thank you for choosing to receive Continental Airlines OnePass  statement communications electronically. Your latest statement is  now online.  To view your mileage activity since your last statement, log into your account and visit the "Activity Since Your Last Statement" area.  [IMAGE]  To access your new statement, just visit Your Account at:  https://onepass.continental.com/your-account .  If you have any questions regarding your account, please e-mail the  OnePass Service Center at OnePass@coair.com  and make sure to  include your name and OnePass number (FE003899) in your e-mail message.  [IMAGE]  OnePass Brings You More of Europe with New Alliance Partner KLM  [IMAGE]We're pleased to increase your mileage earning and reward travel opportunities with new alliance partner KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.  To celebrate we're offering double miles on KLM flights systemwide. Visit onepass.continental.com  to learn more.

Travel Updates
Be sure to check continental.com  before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

If you need assistance please visit www.continental.com/service .
View our Privacy Policy
This e-mail was sent to: john.griffith@enron.com
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


i would have paid you in full Tueday morning and resigned my bookie
services...

John J Lavorato@ENRON
12/31/2000 10:43 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Almost pulled off the 4 tease yesterday.
I was robbed

Denver +3 350
Phili +3 350


can you send it through lavo.  he's suppose to pay for it.
thanks,
john

Liz M Taylor
02/09/2001 09:16 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Super Bowl

Hi Johnnie,

I think you may have encrypted your reply about the reimbursement of the air
fare from the Super Bowl.  I was unable to read your response.  Please send
again.

Liz


Dave,

Attached for your review, please find a clean draft of the above-referenced
Agreement.  Please note that there are several provisions which I have
highlighted for your special attention.  This Agreement will require several
additional changes after you provide me with the payment tables.  Please call
me at 3-9720 with any comments or questions.

Jason


Thanks, I've incorporated your changes.

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           12/04/2000 08:25 AM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

First,  I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter??  confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone
wants to bid for a longer term they can--
Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed
above-
Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again.

MK

Steven Harris
12/04/2000 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some
available and were not looking to expand there.

Drew Fossum
12/04/2000 07:57 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group.  Should we also solicit
turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal.
border to Thoreau?  Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained
segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on?  DF

Lindy Donoho
12/01/2000 02:22 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Draft Open Season Posting

Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion.  Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!


Lee,
 Please review the attached GTC confirm to see if this is what you want.  I
talked to Darren Vanek about this last evening and he had no problem in
structuring the transaction in this manner.

	Lee L Papayoti
	05/23/2001 03:54 PM

		 To: Rudwell Johnson/NA/Enron, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Roche Vitamins, Inc. - Freeport

I am working with Roche Vitamins, who are trying to trigger a fixed price for
the remaining term of their HPL contract, from June01 to Feb02.  They want to
trigger a fixed price for about 400 MMBtu/d.

Rudwell - we discussed a collateral threshold of $100,000 with this entity,
based on the limited information that we have received from this privately
held company.  I assume this is still correct?

Dan - could you send me some draft language that we would insert into the HPL
contract for the collateral threshold matter???  It is a typical HPL physical
contract (HPL already has the right to request payment securities for good
cause) - if you don't already have a copy of the contract, let me know and
I'll fax it to you.

Roche want to review the language and get it approved internally before doing
anything.

Thanks

Lee