That is funny.  I just ordered some more to sell on EBay, I can buy four sleeves for $16.50 and they are going for $40 a sleeve on EBay.  You might want to sell them.  We were actually a skit last week on Saturday Night Live.  Pretty funny stuff.  Keep working on your wife about Jazz Fest.  Ash is working her too.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mike Jillard" <mjillard@beaconelectric.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	RE: Andersen

You guys are going to end up as a skit on Saturday Night Live. Also I forgot
to send you so love
for the Care Package. No golf course will let me on with them but that's ok.
I will put them
in my bag with my Firestone Golf balls.
Thanks again for the stuff.

Jilly

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M. [mailto:Phillip.M.Love@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:55 AM
To: dlove8847@aol.com; James Love (E-mail); alove@houston.rr.com; "Jason
<jmjaked (E-mail); Everett" "Smith (E-mail); Frank Binetti (E-mail);
Gregory "Sonntag (E-mail); Mike <mjillard (E-mail); ROCK (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Andersen

-----Original Message-----
From: Hopkins, Stephanie
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Annette Hopkins (E-mail); Bill Hopkins (E-mail); Bobbie-Lynn Gallois
(E-mail); Cathy-Anne Delaune (E-mail); Brady, Edward; Julie Greiner
(E-mail); Katie Devall (E-mail); Kevin Murray (E-mail); Melissa Alford
(E-mail); Tyrus Brailey (E-mail); Kulic, Sladana-Anna; Mills, Bruce;
Doan, Jad; Love, Phillip M.
Subject: FW: Andersen

Stephanie Hopkins
Enron Net Works
Risk Management
(713) 853-5211

-----Original Message-----
From: Morua, Mark (US - Houston) [mailto:mmorua@deloitte.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:10 PM
To: Poche', Tim (US - Houston); Worthing, Ashley; Charles. A. Lestage
(E-mail); Fernando Granda (E-mail); Jennifer J Dubos (E-mail); Kelly
Sills (E-mail); Marcia McMorris (E-mail); Missy St. Germain (E-mail);
Hopkins, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Andersen

This is pretty funny!

Mark A. Morua
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Assurance and Advisory Services
713-982-4574
713-207-3116 (Reliant)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarratt, Joel (US - Houston)
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:03 PM
To: Ellis, Bryan (US - Houston); Paladino, Gianpaolo (US - Houston);
Morua, Mark (US - Houston); LeGrand, Chris (US - Houston); Stephenson,
Allison (US - Houston); Almon, Misty (US - Houston); McIntyre, Nicole
(US - Houston); Schwausch, Scott (US - Houston); Wight, Jennifer (US -
Houston); Rodriguez, Katherine (US - Houston); Murrell, Brian (US -
Houston)
Subject: Forwarding to team REGCO (and selected others) for their
amusement

-----Original Message-----
From: Popfarm@aol.com [mailto:Popfarm@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Jarratt, Joel (US - Houston); jdjarr_99@yahoo.com
Subject: (no subject)

watch what you shred    XXXXPOP
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Wednesday, January 23, 2002    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   continental.com Specials for Susan Scott  [IMAGE]    Travel Tools [IMAGE]  View Flight Schedules In An Instant With Our Electronic Timetables  Whether you're online or on the go, Continental's flight information is always at your fingertips. Visit continental.com  to download the latest flight schedules to your computer, handheld, or internet-enabled device, or use our new PDF version and print only the pages you need.  Click for more info              Travel Updates  Be sure to check continental.com  before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!          This e-mail includes: This Week's Destinations ,  Continental Vacation Offers , Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels & Resorts, & Embassy Suites Hotels Offers , Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels Offers , Alamo Rent A Car Offers , National Car Rental Offers .   continental.com Specials  Airport Hubs This Week's Destinations    Depart Saturday, January 26 and return on either Monday, January 28 or Tuesday, January 29, 2002. Please see the Terms and Conditions  listed at the end of this e-mail.  Purchase continental.com Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at www.continental.com . You can also purchase continental.com Specials for an additional cost of $20 per ticket through our toll-free reservations number at 1-800-642-1617.  Round-trip travel may originate in either city. From/To Cleveland  $119.00 - Hartford, CT $139.00 - Los Angeles, CA $109.00 - Nashville, TN $119.00 - Providence, RI $109.00 - Richmond, VA From/To Houston  $109.00 - Lafayette, LA $109.00 - Mobile, AL $139.00 - San Jose, CA     $109.00 - Shreveport, LA From/To New York/Newark  $119.00 - Greenville/Spartanburg, SC $199.00 - San Diego, CA   [IMAGE]     Continental Vacation Offers    5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles Just for Skiing!    Enjoy the best of Colorado's white powder during ski season. Book a ski package for 5 nights or longer and you can earn 5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles.    For more information about this exciting offer, visit continental.coolvacations.com .  [IMAGE]  Partner Hotel Specials  Hilton, Embassy Suites, Double Tree  continental.com Specials from Hilton Hotels and Resorts, Doubletree Hotels and Resorts, and Embassy Suites Hotels  The following rates are available January 26 - January 28, 2002 and are priced per night. Cities listed are for the nearest airport, not necessarily for the location of the hotel. To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at www.hilton.com/en/hi/promotions/valuerates/ .  Cleveland, OH  Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport - $79  Hartford, CT Hilton Hartford, Hartford, CT. - $159 Doubletree Hotel Bradley International Airport, Windsor Lock, CT. - $119  Houston, TX Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - $109  Lafayette, LA Hilton Lafayette and Towers - $119  Los Angeles Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San Pedro, CA. - $119 Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport, Irvine, CA. - $139 Embassy Suites Hotel Buena Park-Located Near Disneyland Park and Knott's Berry Farm, Buena Park, CA. - $79 Embassy Suites Hotel Los Angeles-Intl Arpt. South, El Segundo, CA. - $129  Newark, NJ Hilton Pearl River, Pearl River, NY. - $145 Hilton Parsippany, Parsippany, NJ. - $69 Hilton Newark Gateway, Newark, NJ. - $209 Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ. - $179 San Diego, CA  Hilton San Diego Mission Valley, San Diego, CA. - $99/Night, 1/26-27 Hilton San Diego Gaslamp Quarter, San Diego, CA. - $289/Night, 1/26-27  San Jose, CA Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View, Mountain View, CA. - $209 Hilton Newark/Fremont, Newark, CA. - $147 Hilton Monterey, Monterey, CA. - $129 Hilton San Jose South/Scotts Valley, Scotts Valley, CA. - $139  Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel. Or call 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these  rates.   return to top       Starwood Hotels continental.com Specials Last-minute Weekend Rates from Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels  Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for this weekend January 25 - January 29, 2002.promo.starwood.com/csco   California Costa Mesa - The Westin South Coast Plaza - $88.00  Culver City - Four Points by Sheraton Culver City - $69.00  Fullerton - Four Points by Sheraton Fullerton - $68.00  Los Angeles - Sheraton Gateway Hotel Los Angeles Airport - $77.00  Los Angeles - The Westin Bonaventure Hotel and Suites - $88.00  Los Angeles - Four Points by Sheraton Los Angeles International Airport - $64.00  Millbrae - The Westin San Francisco Airport - $139.00 Ontario - Sheraton Ontario Airport Hotel - $58.00 Pleasanton - Four Points by Sheraton Pleasanton - $103.00  Pomona - Sheraton Suites Fairplex - $69.00 Rancho Bernardo - Four Points by Sheraton Rancho Bernardo - $74.00  San Francisco - Palace Hotel - $85.00  San Francisco - The Westin St. Francis - $149.00  Santa Clara - The Westin Santa Clara - $77.00  South San Francisco - Four Points by Sheraton San Francisco Airport - $79.00 Sunnyvale - Four Points by Sheraton Sunnyvale - $59.00  Universal City - Sheraton Universal Hotel - $119.00  Connecticut Danbury - Sheraton Danbury Hotel - $75.00  Stamford - The Westin Stamford - $77.00  Stamford - Sheraton Stamford Hotel - $77.00 Windsor Locks - Sheraton Bradley Airport Hotel - $99.00   New Jersey East Rutherford - Sheraton Meadowlands Hotel and Conference Center - $99.00  Edison - Sheraton Edison Hotel Raritan Center - $75.00  Elizabeth - Four Points by Sheraton Newark Airport - $77.00  Iselin - Sheraton at Woodbridge Place Hotel - $71.00  Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany Hotel - $70.00  Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Somerset/Piscataway - $75.00 Mt Arlington - Four Points by Sheraton Mt Arlington - $68.00   New York New York - The St. Regis - $400.00  New York - Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers - $169.00  New York - Essex House - A Westin Hotel - $199.00  New York - The St. Regis Club at the Essex House, New York - $299.00   Ohio Wickliffe - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland East - $64.00   Rhode Island Providence - The Westin Providence - $156.00  Warwick - Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel - $79.00  Tennessee Nashville - Sheraton Music City - $62.00  Texas Houston - The Westin Oaks - $71.00   For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and conditions  below.  return to top  Partner Car Rental Specials continental.com Specials from Alamo Rent A Car  Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations only.  Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, January 26 with returns Monday, January 28 or Tuesday, January 29, 2002.  Alamo    $25 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL) $18 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA) $20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE) $26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR) $18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH) $20 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX) $25 a day in:  Providence, RI (PVD) $20 a day in:  San Diego, CA (SAN) $20 a day in:  San Jose, CA (SJC)     To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make advance reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your reservation online at www.alamo.com  or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.  If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo offers great rates when you book online at www.alamo.com .   For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions  below.   return to top     continental.com Specials from National Car Rental   Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations only.  Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, January 26 with returns Monday, January 28 or Tuesday, January 29, 2002.  National    $28 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL) $21 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA) $23 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE) $29 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR) $23 a day in:  Greenville/Spartanburg, SC (GSP) $21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH) $23 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX) $29 a day in:  Lafayette, LA (LFT) $21 a day in:  Mobile, AL (MOB) $23 a day in:  Richmond, VA (RIC) $23 a day in:  San Diego, CA (SAN) $23 a day in:  San Jose, CA (SJC)      To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make your reservation in advance and be sure to request Product Code COOLUS.  To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at www.nationalcar.com .  Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.  If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, National offers great rates when you book online at www.nationalcar.com .  For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions  below.  return to top  Terms and Conditions  continental.com Specials Rules Fares include an $18.60 fuel surcharge. Passenger Facility Charges, up to $18 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $3 per segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included. Applicable  International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $108, varying by destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase.   For a complete listing of rules please visit:  www.continental.com .    Terms and Conditions for Westin, Sheraton, Four Points, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection, and W Hotels: promo.starwood.com    Alamo Rent A Car's Terms and Conditions:  www.alamo.com     National Car Rental Terms and Conditions: Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic driving restrictions may apply.   return to top      If you need assistance please visit www.continental.com/service .  This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.  View our Privacy Policy .  This e-mail was sent to: sscott5@enron.com      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


We regret the recent response to the subject email "Password Security Notice"
that you may have received.  The particular email was inappropriate and the
ISC has therefore taken immediate disciplinary action against the individual
responsible.

Allan Sommer
Integrated Solutions Center (ISC)


Scott,
The wife is out of town until Saturday night.    I can play alot of golf on Saturday,  but I need to spend time with the wife on Sunday.     I will be available for the golf marathon on Saturday.    I have one player for Saturday morning,  but I dont have a player for Sat. afternoon yet, although I have another co-worker who is interested.
Should I fill this spot as well?

JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jacobucci, Scott" <Scott.Jacobucci@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jacobucci+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EJacobucci+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	RE: golf

John,  I am setting up a tee time for Sunday 8/5 around 8-9 AM at Augusta
Pines.  I just wanted to confirm if you could play Saturday afternoon at TPC
or Sunday morning at Augusta Pines?

Talk to you soon,

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: John.M.Forney@enron.com [mailto:John.M.Forney@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:16 PM
To: Jacobucci, Scott
Subject: RE: golf

Scott,
I heard that the TPC was in decent shape.    Are you planning on playing on
Saturday in the morning or afternoon?
How many people do you have in the group?

JForney
713-853-7160

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jacobucci, Scott" <Scott.Jacobucci@ElPaso.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jacobucci+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EJacobucci+40ElPas
o+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:13 AM
   To:     'jforney@enron.com'
   Subject:  golf

   John,

   Just checking to see if I have your email address correct.  Did you find
   out
   anything on TPC?

   Scott

   ******************************************************************
   This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
   Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
   use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
   If you have received this email in error please notify the
   sender.
   ******************************************************************

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Hi Team!  I will be out of the office on Friday, March 31st.  Please call
Scott Goodell at 713-853-7711 with any questions you may have.

Later


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Novosel, Sarah; Fromer, Howard;
Landwehr, Susan M.; Guerrero, Janel; Allegretti, Daniel; Roan, Michael;
Hoatson, Tom; Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Presto, Kevin M.;
Belden, Tim; Herndon, Rogers; Black, Don; Misra, Narsimha; Brown, Jeff;
Aucoin, Berney C. ; Maurer, Luiz; Twiggs, Thane; Lavorato, John;
Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; Duran, W. David;
Calger, Christopher F.; Nord, Sue
Subject: Enron's FERC filing opposing icap

Today at FERC, Enron filed a pleading requesting the complete elimination of "icap" as a product (including any "reserve type" products) based on the fact that the real time spot markets of the RTOS can effectively price this in the cost of energy.  The pleading also includes a proposed interim approach (with a two year sunset date).  This pleading was made in response to FERC's request for comments on "Ensuring Sufficient Capacity Reserves In Today's Energy Markets."

The pleading and affidavit of Larry Ruff, PhD are attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
12:40 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
08/07/2000 12:31 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Breckenridge Offsite - August 18 - 20, 2000

FYI!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
08/07/2000 12:31 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samer Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Breckenridge Offsite - August 18 - 20, 2000

Hello everyone:

Attached is the Itinerary and Agenda for the Breckenridge offsite, Friday,
August 18 to Sunday August 20th.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks!

Shirley


FYI, Mark
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Black, Don
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	Re: Taping conversations in california

Mark, someone from our side dug this up with the help of outside counsel it appears.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Black/HOU/EES on 08/03/2001 01:11 PM ---------------------------

 	Enron Energy Services  From:  Mike D Smith                           08/03/2001 12:46 PM

To:	Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Re: Taping conversations in california

Here is the answer on taping.  Looks like we can't do it w/o consent.  MDS
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 08/03/2001 12:45 PM ---------------------------

"Kristen Bird" <kb@quinnemanuel.com> on 08/02/2001 07:32:19 PM
To:	<sdietric@enron.com>, "Shon Morgan" <sm@quinnemanuel.com>
cc:	<msmith1@enron.com>
Subject:	Re: Taping conversations in california

Mike/Sarah,

California Penal Code Sections 631 and 632 make it a misdemeanor to record a telephone conversation without the consent of all the parties.  In addition, civil penalties are available in the amount of $5,000 per violation.  This is true whether the caller is in California or some other state.  If either party is in some other state, however, you may want to also check the law of that state.

If you are planning on taping a conversation, you should get unambiguous consent from all parties on the call before you begin taping.  Once you begin taping, you should again say words to the effect of, "the parties have consented and awknowledge that this conversation is being recorded" so that you have a record of the consent.  There does not appear to be any requirement of a periodic beep or tone (but it probably doesn't hurt so that the parties don't claim they didn't know that portion of the call was being recorded).

Monitoring and/or eavesdropping also is not acceptable in California without the consent of all parties to the call.  Similar disclosures would need to be made in that regard.

We have numerous former prosecutors in the office with experience with the statute so let me know if we can help with anything specific.

Regards,
Kristen

Kristen Bird
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017

(213) 624-7707 (phone)
(213) 624-0643 (fax)

>>> "Sarah Dietrich" <sdietric@enron.com> 08/02/01 04:47PM >>>

What is the law regarding the taping of telephone conversations in California in
the following instances:

--  both the caller (taping party) and recipient are located in California and

--  the caller (taping party) is not in California but the recipient is located
in California.

Must a statement be made that the call is being taped?  If so, are there any
magic words?

Should there be a beep or tone periodically during the conversation?

Any other requirements?

We would appreciate a response as soon as possible, preferably early Friday.

Since I will be out of the office on Friday, please include Mike D. Smith in
your response so that he can relay it to our business people.

Thank you again for your assistance.

Regards,

Sarah

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
Cc:	kengruhl@citlink.net
Subject:	Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Saturday Sept 15, HE 8:00 to Sunday Sept. 16, HE 7:00

Notes:
1) This is a tuning day, so expect lots of swing.
2)  MW outputs are average values only in order to schedule overall gas
nomination for the 24 hour period.
3)  Actual MW must be handled in real time.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic01543.pcx)
 - pic01543.pcx


You should indicate that the severance plan is subject to the approval of the Enron Corp. Board of Directors.  We do have a plan in place, but we haven't terminated any employees under that plan  in the last few weeks.  So, we can't say that there is not plan in place righ now.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Russi, Estalee
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Severance Announcement
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Wes Colwell held a floor meeting yesterday where he announced what he thought the severance packages would look like, 1 1/2 weeks for each year of service and 1 1/2 weeks for every $10,000 of your annual salary maximum of 39 weeks no doubling.  Apparently that is not correct or has not been approved so I was going to send out the following announcement to those who attended his meeting for clarification.  Please give me your feedback as soon as possible.

Estalee

Yesterday in Wes Colwell's floor meeting a possible Severance Plan scenario was discussed.  The Severance Plan is under review and at this time we do not have a defined plan in place.  Once we know exactly what the plan will look like we will communicate to you as quickly as possible.  We are sorry for any misunderstanding there may be.  Please feel free to contact your HR Representative with any additional questions.


Attached is the weekly report re ECT Litigation.


New deals:

Nov #151202
Dec #151203


Start Date: 12/19/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121908.txt


Lillian, I forgot to add that the slate of directors and officers for
Capacity Management Corp. will be identical to that of Transwestern Pipeline
Company.,


Dan:
Here are the questions some of your guys sent us yesterday.  I recently faxed
you pages which state the amount of the Enron Guarantees, which are mentioned
in these questions.  Please give myself or Don Miller a call if you have any
additional questions.  Thank you!
Ben


Dan,
If  we have a full requirements contract with no minimums can they choose not
to run their plant and therefore not take any gas?
South Hampton Refining has requested this for January.  Can you give me some
feedback.

Thanks,
Gary


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, October 9
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
October 6.

Thank you,
Katherine


I need a Destin class.  The only think I know about Destin is that its a
Transco Z4 Mainline Point.


Jeff,

Do we know how much Edison's total under collection is?  Would it be as simple as to determine their total (around $3 billion?) and  gross receivable (before any payments - 145 million) and calculate the % (around 5%)?  This would result in a pretty small percentage.  Another way to look at it would be on a % of load basis.  If you use the DA load information Sue forwarded to us on October 1st,   this % (5.7%)  would also be very small.  How do you think they will look at it?  I think we would all agree to a 5% haircut, if they would JUST PAY US!

Wanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October  23, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Curry, Wanda; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:	RE: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Wanda:  I faxed the examples that Edison faxed us and that you and Michael and I talked about some time back.  I'm sure that's how Edison would calculate it.  Does it make sense to run the numbers and see what our "contribution" to Edison's undercollection would be under Edison's view?  If you need another copy, let me know.  Question:  I don't know what our book looks like on this issue, but if we were to take the "netting" through a reduction in the PX credit going forward, how much of a hit would that be, particularly if we were to get the $120 MM up front?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Jeff --

How would we calculate EES' "contribution" to SCE undercollection?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

I talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:

They plan to "settle" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.
Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.
He said that they will propose to net it out in one of two ways:  1) lump sum netting (i.e., if they owe $50MM and the share of the undercollection is $30 MM, then they pay the ESP $20 MM; or 2) future reductions in PX Credit (i.e., they pay the ESP $50 MM, and then reduce the PX going forward until the $30 MM is paid down).  The numbers are illustrative only.
In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)
I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.
He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison "meet and confer" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.
Fielder is also the point person on "getting ESPs paid" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.
It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.

If you have any questions, let us know.

Best,
Jeff


What are the cost per trade?

-----Original Message-----
From: Heather K. Strauss [mailto:heather_strauss@prusec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: CL/CO - Barton

Mark,

The fee for this account is $35.00 per year.

Regards,

Heather Strauss
Assistant to Michael Barton

*************************************************************************************************

The confidentiality of Internet e-mail cannot be guaranteed. Information you
send us
over Internet e-mail could be viewed by persons other than the intended
recipients.
Therefore, you should not include your account numbers, credit card numbers,
passwords, home address or other private information in your e-mail messages.
Also, we will not accept buy or sell orders or cancels, address changes, funds
transfer requests or other instructions normally requiring your signature by
e-mail.

All market prices, data and other information in this communication are not
warranted
as to completeness or accuracy and may be subject to change. This communication
is not an official record of your account and should not be relied upon for
information
regarding your account. Please refer to your Trade Confirmation and Client
Statement
which are the official records of your account. If there are any discrepancies
between
this transmission and your Trade Confirmation and Client Statement, you should
rely
on the Trade Confirmation and Client Statement and contact your local branch
manager with any questions.

This information is being sent to you for your information or at your request.
If you do
not wish to receive any further information about our products or services,
please
send a message via e-mail to PSI_DO_NOT_EMAIL@ PRUDENTIAL.COM.

Prudential Securities Incorporated
One Seaport Plaza New York, NY 10292

*************************************************************************************************


Gentlemen:

Please advise me soonest your availability for a conference call re: the
above-referenced topic
on Thursday, November 30th at 3:00 PM PST.

[Note:  it was previously suggested for 2:00 PM PST but conflicts preclude
scheduling the call
for that timeframe.]

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 04:38 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/29/2000 03:42 PM

		 To: "John Burkholder" <burkee@cts.com>
		 cc: "Mike Alexander" <alexanms@sce.com>, "Rick Counihan"
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Colin
Cushnie" <cushnice@sce.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Mike Day"
<mday@gmssr.com>, "Paul Amirault" <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>, "Doug Porter"
<porterdk@sce.com>, "Tom Beach" <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
		 Subject: Re: Letter Proposal and more

I suggest a quick conference call to discuss.  How's tomorrow (Thursday) at 2
pm work for folks?  Let me know and I'll set up a call-in number.


The information books should be in everyone's hands by about 8:30 Thursday
morning.  Let me know if you have any trouble getting your copy.  Michael
Ratner is now building a baseline economic model for each of the four (4)
assets using data presented in the information memoranda.  Once the model
works, we will be able to modify the data to run various cases for various
asset combinations.  We need to identify all synergies and any other areas of
special consideration that could impact our valuation (i.e. does ownership of
Minnegasco provide any strategic opportunities, any value in the AC line
access to northeast pipelines, etc.)

You should soon receive another smaller packet from Merrill Lynch describing
two different deal structures for our consideration - one is a "prepaid
lease" arrangement, the other a "leveraged partnership".

I am trying to set up a meeting with Robert Eichenroht to discuss PUHCA
issues and how this deal would be impacted if we were to include either the
Arkla LDC or Minnegasco package.

Non-binding EOI's are due next Wednesday and time is short.  Bill Cordes will
be in Houston next Tuesday and we have tentatively scheduled a group meeting
for 8:00 AM.  [Location not yet confirmed, but we will try for a video conf.
room so Omaha can participate.]  Please mark your calendars.

JNG


John looks good.  I have a call into Lisa Sawyer to get her opinion on the 9/30 target date.
	But you can go ahead and get this to Debbie.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:02 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	NNG Winter Ops. presentation

Lynn,
This revised presentation has Larry Berger's Flowing Gas changes, do you approve before I send it to Debbie.

 << File: Northern Natural Gas Winter Operations Meeting 2001.ppt >>

Thanks: John Buchanan


Yowser, Jeff!  You had 501 participants during the live eSpeak session, and 297 people have read your transcript from 11 a.m. until 4: 10 p.m.   I'll send another email at the end of the day tomorrow, as the first 24 hours after an event normally carry the highest readership stats.

Cheers,
Sarah.


All:

ECS will be signing Christmas cards to send to our customers tomorrow
afternoon (sorry for the late notice).  You are invited to join in the
festivities at Slainte Irish Pub (509 Main Street) at 2:30pm.  Grinches need
not attend, as much merriment will abound.  Come early or come late  -  hope
to see you there!

~John


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 01:06 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  CoganJA@aol.com                           04/02/2001 12:35 PM

To:	<cfoster@enron.com>
cc:	<sbreen@czn.com>
Subject:	Fwd: Citizens Gas Supply Offer - PPL counter proposal

Chris,

Here is the counter.  I will talk to you before I get own the plane.

John

Return-Path: <tjcrupi@pplweb.com>
Received: from  rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (rly-yg01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.1]) by air-yg04.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:22:00 -0500
Received: from  mailgate.pplweb.com (mailgate.pplweb.com [167.155.6.158]) by rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:21:32 -0400
Received: from dl23003x.papl.com (dl23003x.papl.com [167.155.16.38])	by mailgate.pplweb.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.8.6) with SMTP id PAA19127;	Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:17:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: tjcrupi@pplweb.com
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)	by em-srv-f.papl.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25798;	Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:16:21 -0400 (EDT)
Disposition-Notification-To: tjcrupi@pplweb.com
X-OpenMail-Hops: 2
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:16:20 -0400
Message-Id: <"H0000f820a8747f1.0986238980.em-srv-a*"@MHS>
Subject: Citizens Gas Supply Offer - PPL counter proposal
MIME-Version: 1.0
TO: CoganJA@aol.com, sbreen@czn.com
CC: jacammarano@pplweb.com, baveety@pplweb.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="openmail-part-00489817-00000001"
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

Sean/John,
We'd like to thank you for puttting together this offer for bundled supply to
our Griffith facility.  We are very agreeable to the structure and general
framework that you have laid out.  We did make a few modifications however and
you can find them in the attached redlined version of your proposal.  We will
available to discuss this proposal with Citizens.

Thanks

Terry

 - PPL - Griffith Gas Sales Proposal-rev.doc


To re-cap:

I've changed three Short Term West Hourly deals to reflect what all parties
have agreed to - EPMI sells to Sierra Pacific Holding Co., HE 23-24 on 4/28,
HE 1-24 on 4/29, and HE 1-6 on 4/30. Instead of selling to the Automated
Power Exchange, we'll be using them as the broker, paying a $.03 per MW fee,
and selling to Sierra Pacific. Following are the changed deal numbers, for
reference:

595705
595714
595819

I believe this should clear up any discrepancies we had among different
counterparties' invoices. Now all we have to do is cross our fingers....no,
just kidding. Please let me know if you have questions, or if problems arise
from these changes.

Thank you,
Kate


Chris--The attached table is an updated version of the one I sent you last
night.   The only thing missing is the AGL numbers which I am finalizing now,
since we understand our latitude with respect to the storage.   I will forward
a complete version of the attached to you with the AGL numbers shortly, but I
wanted to get you the COH Choice numbers, which now reflect the Baseload
storage withdrawals volumes for March.   Also, the attached version contains
the correct numbers for the programs scheduled by K. Novsek.

One other point, the COH choice volumes shown in the rows labelled 'PRIM' are
total requirements less storage withdrawals only.  I have not subtracted the
volumes of March physical hedged previously hedged by Brian Perrone.

Please call if you have questions.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03 00 SUPPLY NEEDS - ALL LDCS                     (MASTER).xls


As long as the wire amount is OK, I don't think Houston will catch on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Thome, Stephen
Subject: RE: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

Steve,

The difference is because I rounded the purchase prices from AEP and Avista in the P&L spreadsheet, rather than taking a weighted average.  The wire request amount is correct.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Crandall, Sean
Cc: Sewell, Doug
Subject: RE: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

Sean,

I came up with a $3936 difference between this and your wire requests.  The wire requests were on the high side.  I am sending it off to Houston with a note that we may need to revise it.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Thome, Stephen
Cc: Scholtes, Diana; Belden, Tim
Subject: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

								6th Week	  	 Gross Revenue	  	 Expense	  	 Net P&L
	128	 88	  	  	 20.5	 19.25
Point	 Buy/Sale	 Counterparty	 On	 Off	 Price	 Deal #	 	On Hours	 Off hours	 On Hours	 Off hours	  	  	 On	 Off	 Total
MC	 S	 CRC	 	-25	 150	 508906	 	0	 2200	  $                -   	 $     330,000 	 $           -   	 $  42,350 	 $           -   	 $287,650
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	75	 658386	 	3200	 0	  $        240,000 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $   174,400 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 73	 600522	 	6400	 4400	  $        467,200 	 $     321,200 	 $   131,200 	 $  84,700 	 $   336,000 	 $236,500
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 72	 600521	 	6400	 4400	  $        460,800 	 $     316,800 	 $   131,200 	 $  84,700 	 $   329,600 	 $232,100
MC	 S	 GRAYS	 -10	 	64	 715879	 	1280	 0	  $         81,920 	 $             -   	 $     26,240 	 $         -   	 $     55,680 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -14	 	47.5	 664061	 	1792	 0	  $         85,120 	 $             -   	 $     36,736 	 $         -   	 $     48,384 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 	-13	 47.5	 664061	 	0	 1144	  $                -   	 $      54,340 	 $           -   	 $  22,022 	 $           -   	 $  32,318
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 	42.9	 448835	 	6400	 0	  $        274,560 	 $             -   	 $   131,200 	 $         -   	 $   143,360 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 	42.75	 447576	 	6400	 0	  $        273,600 	 $             -   	 $   131,200 	 $         -   	 $   142,400 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Air Products	 -6	 	41.19	 737863	 	768	 0	  $         31,634 	 $             -   	 $     15,744 	 $         -   	 $     15,890 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Douglas	 -25	 	37.15	 831359	 	3200	 0	  $        118,880 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $     53,280 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Intel	 -4	 	34.6	 802102	 	512	 0	  $         17,715 	 $             -   	 $     10,496 	 $         -   	 $      7,219 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	34.5	 822090	 	3200	 0	  $        110,400 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $     44,800 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -15	 	31.85	 871641	 	1920	 0	  $         61,152 	0	  $     39,360 	 	  $     21,792
	41472	 12144	  $     2,222,981 	 $  1,022,340 	 $   850,176 	 $233,772 	 $1,372,805 	 $788,568 	 $2,161,373

	Total	 -324	 -138


Souad,

In connection with the confirm I sent you earlier, I am also attaching a form
of fax letter for transmittal of the confirm to the Counterparty.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 11:32 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	08/25/2000 09:53 AM

		 To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Grupo Califra, S.A. de C.V. Deemed ISDA


Tom,

I recently received this nomination and the total package of gas for the
aforementioned changed as follows:

Counterparty    Meter  Last Nom  Latest Nom  Chg.
Walter O & G    9747  3,901mmbtu/d  3,426mmbtu/d  (475)mmbtu/d
Walter O & G    9787  1,604mmbtu/d  1,713mmbtu/d    109mmbtu/d
Walter O & G    9808  4,890mmbtu/d  4,950mmbtu/d      60mmbtu/d
Superior Natural Gas   9741  2,783mmbtu/d  2,570mmbtu/d  (213)mmbtu/d
          Total change  (519)mmbtu/d
I've made the change in my spreadsheet.

vlt
x3-6353


We drinking beer tonight?  You called me to late yesterday.


At the request of John Pavetto, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the agreement  meets with your approval, please
execute it and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will have it
executed by Enron and return a copy to you via fax.  If you have any comments
or questions please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


I haven't totaled everything up yet but it is $125 plus $5 for free agents
(which it sounds like you had none) plus you get $30 $20 $10 for 1st 2nd 3rd
place weekly finish respectively

Tori Kuykendall
12/12/2000 11:17 AM
To: Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: fantasy football

hey martin - i know i havent paid for the fantasy league at all - but i am
trying to figure out how much i owe - i think 3 of my transactions shouldve
been free because 1 was to change kickers on the same team and 2 were to
change my defense on the bye week - so, without any winnings - i think i owe
$145 - can you verify?  thanks.  also - can you tell me if i won anything for
making the semi-finals?


Jeff:

You had better pray that none of us at EECC get a questionnaire from Fortune.

Best Regards,

Nieves G. Soto


Joe,

Randy will have to e-mail me if you would like to be added as a user.  I
sent him the list to view, but he has not contacted me at this time to make
any changes.  I am sure it won't be a problem.  I will help in any way I
can.

Regards,

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Jennifer Ross
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

Jennifer, if Randy has updated the user list. I would like to set up a login
and password.
Let me know.
Thanks,
Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Ross [mailto:jross@pira.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

I am so sorry, I sent the first e-mail without it, & then just sent it to
Randall..

Here it is!

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Jennifer Ross
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

Jennifer, I did not get the attachment, did you mean to forward it to me?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Ross [mailto:jross@pira.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:57 AM
To: randall.curry@bhlp.com
Cc: Parks, Joe
Subject: PIRA Users

Randall,

Attached is a Company Usage Report, so you can view who has online access to
what.  If you care to make an additional changes please email me and I will
do so.

Thanks,

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant
affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant
affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


All are currently active in the system and showing they are receiving salary.    We are in the process of correcting some system information issues surrounding Larry Cash and expect to have everything finalized this afternoon.
Thanks, H

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Hall, Bob M; McLoughlin, Hector; Reeves, Leslie
Cc: Beck, Sally
Subject: RE:

HR gave the list to me - I hope they are still getting paid

-----Original Message-----
From: Hall, Bob M
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:03 PM
To: McLoughlin, Hector; Reeves, Leslie
Cc: Kitchen, Louise; Beck, Sally
Subject: FW:

Hector and Leslie

Larry Joe Hunter, Larry Cash, and Jon Lewis are all still with Enron.

Will you please find out why Louise thinks they are gone.

Thanks

bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Wed 1/2/2002 1:26 PM
To: Oquinn, Kari; Hall, Bob M; Beck, Sally; Luce, Laura
Cc:
Subject:

The following people have been identified as no longer with the company although they are on the Netco list.  Please let Kari know on any changes (Jeanie is out).  I assume there are no problems but if so let me know.

Larry Hunter    - Documentation
Deidre McCaffrey - Gas Origination
Larry Cash - Gas Settlements
Jon Lewis - Risk


Please join us in welcoming Julie Kearney to the Human Resources department in Portland effective September 17, 2001.  Julie has been working as a Manager in Human Resources for EBS since April of 1999.  Prior to joining EBS, Julie was a recruiting manager for Triad Technology Group.

In the meantime, if you have any questions or need assistance, please do not hesitate to see Amy or Grace.


NO STAFF MEETING TODAY, JUNE 30, 2000
      HAPPY  HOLIDAY

This is a reminder !!!!!  There will NOT be a Friday Meeting June 30, 2000.

    Date:  Friday June 30, 2000

    Time:  2:30 pm - 4:30 pm

    Location: 30C1

    Topic:   Combined Staff and Budget Meeting

If you have any questions or conflicts, please feel free to call me (3-0643)
or Bev (3-7857).

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643


Attached is a draft Nonwaiver Agreement per our telephone conferences of
yesterday after the meetings with Senator Dunn.  I am available in my office
for a conference call to discuss this.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
Kathryn A. Pugh at kpugh@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from
your system.

 - 289271_1.WPD


As you know, Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) has been reorganized under the leadership of CEO Jim Fallon.  Rich DiMichele supports Jim as COO of EWS, while also continuing in his role as head of Enron Broadband Services (EBS).  EWS businesses include:  Enron North America, EBS, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Global Markets, Enron Europe and Enron Canada.  EWS' business focus remains on maximizing creditor value and determining which businesses and assets will be a part of Enron's reorganization plan.

In addition to Rich, reporting to Jim are:

?	Don Miller - ENA
?	Gary Hickerson - EGM
?	Rodney Malcolm - EIM
?	Eric Shaw - Enron Europe
?	Kyle Kitagawa - Enron Canada
?	Lance Schuler - General Counsel
?	Barry Pearce - Chief of Staff
?	Dave Gorte - RAC
?	Kent Castleman - Accounting
?	Shanna Funkhouser - Human Resources

Enron Wholesale Services

<Embedded MS Organization Chart 2.0>


I hope I am not too late.


The report named: East Power Desk Daily Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=14&report_name=East+Power+Desk+Daily+Position+Report&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


FYI - I will talk to you separately. See other e-mail

Jose
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/31/2001 08:39 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
05/31/2001 08:38 PM
To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Renunciando a ABRACEEL

Luiz. After consideration of currents events we believe this in an opportune
moment for you to resign as President of Abraceel and turn over the reigns to
your successor.

Two reasons.  First,  the President's position in Abraceel is one that you
could not fill from Houston and given your imminent departure you need time
to advise your Board and plan for an orderly transition; secondly, as
President of Abraceel, you are called by the press to make public statements
to defend the position of power marketers in general. This is why we wanted
you in that role in the first place, but due to the current circumstances
that has become a temporary liability.

When you speak to the Press, you are mostly identified by the informed sector
leaders as Enron, no matter how thoroughly you try to clarify that  you are
speaking as President of Abraceel. In the meantime,  Orlando is in the middle
of intensive negotiations with the government members and some of your recent
comments have been untimely, in that it makes it appear, in public, that the
Crisis Management Group issue leader, in insensitive to the power marketers
(read Enron) position, thus undercutting his leverage. That also puts you in
an awkward position, because as President of the organization you are not
serving the membership by not engaging in the public debate.

But this does not mean that you are not still fully engaged in the battle!.
Your prediction that the "policy makers" are taking decisions that will hurt
the market may come true, and if so, we Enron, will come out fighting.

In the mean time,  we will be needing your background and knowledge to move
our viewpoints through the open doors that have been presented to us in the
negotiations.

Rick Shapiro has committed your assistance to the region as long as it is
needed. Joe and Orlando would have wished that the clock could be stopped and
you physical departure be postponed. But they are well aware that it is not
fair to you and your family to postpone the move. We will work something out
so that you can provide assistance from the USA.

Thank you for your perseverance on this long fight.

Jose

Luiz Maurer@ENRON
05/31/2001 09:26 AM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Renunciando a ABRACEEL

Bestard

Obrigado por me ajudar neste assunto.

Gostaria que a orienta??o de resignar a Abraceel fosse formalizada por
escrito, caso isto n?o gere inconvenincias.??LM????


I have made a number of edits of the presentation today.  There are many more
to go.  I think that we can get it shaped up by Friday.  It will require a
lot of coordination to shape it up by Thursday.  In the event that it can't
be whipped into shape by Thursday, I think that we need to boil it down to a
few themes that we present at the group meeting.  We then can finish the
presentation and get it to FERC Friday AM before the call.  Who is making the
final call on this?  How are we going to coordinate?

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Ellen Wolfe <ellen@tca-us.com>                           08/23/2000
02:29 PM

Please respond to ellen@tca-us.com
To: James D Steffes <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
cc: Mary Hain <Mary.Hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>,
Sarah Novosel <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>, Tim Belden
<Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Susan J Mara <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
Subject: Re: Edited Draft of FERC Presentation

Jim and others,

I think we are suffering from not enough time to fully iterate this, as well
as little information on what
others are going present.

The basic messages as I see them (and not having trued this up with Mary or
others) are:

1.  The markets are working consistent with physics and economics; demand is
up, supplies are down and higher
prices are resulting.
2. Characteristics of the retail markets have resulted in risks being passed
to end users.  Are such issues
impeding wholesale markets?  If so, perhaps FERC can influence movement in
this area.
3. We shouldn't equate outcomes at the retail level with bad structure at
wholesale level.  The key is to
distinguish the retail issues so that FERC can focus on the wholesale issues.
4. Any remaining concerns should be studied further rather than simply
receiving blame for the outcomes we've
seen:  Whether there is market power?  Whether rather it's a matter of
scarcity rents?  What are appropriate
scarcity rents?  Is monopsony power on the buyers' side (utilities) causing
undesirable economic and reliability
outcomes.   (And out of this should be consideration of whether an
across-the-board $250 cap is the right one,
especially given that the ISO staff itself recognizes that this is a poor
proxy for what buyers are willing to
pay as scarcity rents.)

That's my 2 cents.  I don't know what Mary's additional thoughts are, nor how
what other parties will say may
affect what we should emphasize.

Certainly, though, your feedback is invaluable.  If you reply with feedback
I'll do what I can to see that
Enron's message reflects your preferences.

Regards,
Ellen.

James D Steffes wrote:

> Mary & Joe --
>
> Given the time frame for our response (2 - 4 minutes), we need to prepare
not
> only our "leave behind" but also our "oral message".
>
> I want to make sure that everyone agrees with the theme and content of our
> verbal discussions.  Can you please put out an outline of the message and
> details and then make sure the Trading desk and CA Govt Affairs agree with
the
> form and delivery (set up a conference call if necessary)?
>
> This is a very complicated issue and very short time frame to deliver.  The
more
> we prepare I think the better we'll do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                              Name: August 24 presentation
to FERC1.ppt
>    August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt       Type: Microsoft PowerPoint
Show (application/vnd.ms-powerpoint)
>                                          Encoding: base64
>                                       Description: Microsoft PowerPoint 97

 - ellen.vcf


Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Head, Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


Per Sally, Tuesday, June 13 has been set for PRC Meeting.  Please block off
all day on your calendar (8:00 AM to 7:00 PM).  I will notify you of location
at a later date.  Please email or call me if you have any questions,

Thanks,
Patti x39106


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Regina Blackshear@ENRON
08/31/2000 07:28 PM
To: ginregblack@yahoo.com, ashp_2@yahoo.com, rubesblack@yahoo.com,
vblack4538@aol.com, l_carter61@hotmail.com,
sonia_l_castorena@reliantenergy.com, Yolanda Clay<yoclay@flash.net>,
Amber.Ebow@enron.com, Loneta Edison<Loneta.Edison@wcom.com>,
NAGILL443@aol.com, Tammy Green <tcgreen@flash.net>, locacherri@aol.com, "R
Jordan"<rhondamjordan@hotmail.com>, "BENEDICT
PETERS"<bouncing98@hotmail.com>, barbtuwhite@yahoo.com, lanetia
yarbrough<yar_bro@yahoo.com>, Diane Salcido/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eve
Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derick
Jones/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amber Limas/HOU/EES@EES, Shirlet
Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: IM

>> > "Be Still"
>> >
>> > God, what do you mean to be still and know you are God?
>> >
>> > My child, what I mean is:
>> >
>> > Though the earth be removed,
>> > Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled,
>> > Though the mountains shake with swelling,
>> > Though the wind blow,
>> > Though the storm rage;
>> >
>> > IN OTHER WORDS
>> >
>> > Though your bills are due,
>> > Though they give you a hard time on your job,
>> > Though your husband won't act right,
>> > Though your wife won't act right,
>> > Though your children are disobedient,
>> > Though there's sickness in your body,
>> > Though your enemies get on your NERVES;
>> >
>> > Stop your WORRIES!
>> >
>> > Stop your COMPLAINING!
>> >
>> > Stop your DOUBTING!
>> >
>> > Stop your FROWNING!
>> >
>> > Cease your fears, and dry up those tears!
>> >
>> > For I'm right there to comfort you,
>> > I'm right there to guide you,
>> > I'm right there to hold you up,
>> > I'm right there to heal you,
>> >
>> > I'm right there to deliver you.
>> >
>> > So cast your cares upon me for I careth for you.
>> > My child this is what I mean by being still and knowing I
>> > AM GOD.
>> >
>> > FOR I AM GOD ALL BY MYSELF!!!
>> >
>> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Tanya:

I know you're swamped so I'll try to make this easy and you can answer "yes"
or "no", etc.

1.  Is First Union National Bank the correct name?  (as opposed to First
Union National Bank, Charlotte)

2.  Threshold for cross default:  We used $100,000,000 for ENE and
$50,000,000 for FUNB.  FUNB wants $100,000,000.

3.  Documents to be delivered:  FUNB will produce audited/consolidated
financials for First Union Corporation.  We requested FUNB financials.

4.  With respect to the ENA master only (the CSA):

 (i)  FUNB wants to post 10-year government bonds in addition to cash and
L'C's

 (ii)  I sent you the FUNB matrix  Is it acceptable?

 (iii) FUNB wants to revise the MAC trigger to include "Baa3 by Moody's" and
"failure to have a Credit Rating from either S&P or Moody's".

 (iv) FUNB wants to revise the definition of "Qualified Institution" to
include not only the rating we assign, but also "having assets in excess of
$10 billion" and also not subject to approval by the non-downgraded party

 (v)  FUNB wants all demands for delivery or return of collateral to be made
on a Valuation Date.  I think we should retain language that demands can be
made on or after a Valuation Date.  But I think we could agree that demands
be made prior to 5 pm New York time.

5.  With respect to the ENA master only (the Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of
First Union National Bank):

 (i)  FUNB wants a $30,000,000 cap (as opposed to the $15,000,000 cap we
proposed)

Two different FUNB people keep calling me, one on the ENA front and the other
with respect to ENE.  Now you know why your assistance is always greatly
appreciated.

Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I am doing fine.   Have a mild headache.

I do not have any plans as of yet.  Did you need me to take you to pick up your car?  I can do that, just let me know, ok.

You were in a daze yesterday.   You seem ok today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:

Good morning,

How are you doing?  I enjoyed our ride in this morning.  I wish it could have been longer, sorry it wasn't.  I so wished it could have been longer, you look so good today.  Let me know what your plans are this evening, maybe I will have some time to spend with you.  I will let you know just as soon as I know.  It is really up in the air right now.  I don't want you to cancel anything.  Hope you have a wonderful day.

I think I am in a still in a daze from this morning, I can't imagine how I would feel if we would have stayed longer, probably very calm and wonderful.  I still feel wonderful, but something seems to be missing, anyway, better work.

Talk to you soon, my sexy thing.


The e-copy.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001
03:44 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
05/17/2001 04:34 PM
To: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Arora/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Demand buy-down proposal

As we discussed....... as much flesh as we can put on this by midday
tommorrow would be quite helpful. I would think there are significant
aggregation opportunities available to us once this is implemented. Let me
know what else you need from me. Thanks.


Bill, the language that we have used for discounting had a 200 basis point
amount attached to it. It should not be included based on our last
conversation.. If this is going to be attached as a schedule  then it still
needs to go through some changes.

The calculation, summary page is almost complete.

BT .


Tana:

None of the following CPs are authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit:

Anadarko Energy Services
Copano Energy Services/Upper Gulf Coast
Primagaz Trading Paris
AEP Communications, Inc.
Aquila Broadband Services, Inc.
Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.
Octagon Resources, Inc.

Leslie


Will we capture these "accelerations" in our accomplishments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/19/2000 11:09
PM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
07/19/2000 07:44 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT, Kyran
Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sadia
Haider/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: recent developments

Several recent developments, and in the interest of economy (mine!), I am
copying all of you, who will have varying interests in this.

First, as soon as the upper house of parliament passes legislation, Austria
will have accelerated their market oppening, to 100% in power by 2001,
October, and by 2002, October for gas.  Sadia, you will want to reflect this
in what you are doing for Kyran/EES, and Kathryn, you will want to note this,
if Investor Relations is updating this data for analysts.  Margaret, FYI to
you, too.

Second, I note that this decision was reached after being supported by a
studyby the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), saying
liberalisation would bring down prices by 12-15%.  Paul H., suggest you have
Viviana get a copy, and if in English, send copies to Margaret Carson.

Belgian cabinet has approved draft regulation lowering power threshold to
20GWh p.a.   This goes to 10 GWh on 31 December 2002.  Sadia, I think this is
again an acceleration, to be reflected in your updated numbers.  Margaret and
Kathryn, also note.

Finally, Kyran, I see that EnergieNed has issued a study saying that there is
"not a direct relationship between efficiency and deregulation".  I may take
issue with this, depending upon what the full text says.  Can you work with
Teun/Sadia to obtain a copy, and, if not too lengthy, get it translated for
my review (and presumably your's, too)?  thanks

Please do not hesitate to contact me should any of you have any questions.
thanks  mcs


Attached are the shippers who have not paid their Jan transportation invoices.

MS reps
Call your shippers ASAP and provide an explanation as to why they are paying late.  There seems to be a few shippers who always pay late - North Star Steele, CMS, KN.  If you feel that we need a marketer to get involved with your late payers, please contact them.

thanks


Message Points

Recent legislative proposals designed to have the state play a dominant role
in developing, owning and operating power plants in California (SB6X--Burton)
and buy PG&E and Edison's electric transmission assets (SB33X--Burton) are
taking California in the wrong direction and won't solve the State's
electricity crisis.
Two new bills are equally disturbing:  AB60X (Hertzerg) would make plant
certification contigent upon the developer agreeing to sell the power to the
state at "just and reasonable, cost based rates."  SB39X (Spier) would make
power plant owners public utilities
The proposals represent a political solution, not a commercial, financial,
economic or technical solution.
As a political solution, these bills will not increase supply, decrease
demand, or get the utilities back on their financial feet.
In fact, it's worse than that.  These bills will exacerbate California's
problems:
The transaction contemplated in SB33X is extremely complex, requiring
approval by state and federal authorities, bondholders, creditors and
others.  California will be forced to spend an enormous amount of time and
resources trying to achieve the deal, with no certainty of success,
particularly in view of PG&E's public opposition.  In the meantime, summer
approaches, and the gap between supply and demand remains staggering.  This
complex, costly and litigious alternative will not lessen the serious threat
of blackouts that California faces this summer.
SB6X would have the state finance, develop, own and/or operate power plants
in the state.

? Unfortunately, the proposal being offered will not solve the problem;
rather, it,s a significant step backward that will make matters worse in
California.

? The reason?  Rather than remove California,s roadblocks to increased
generation and transmission investment, this proposal requires California to
use taxpayer dollars to get into the business of financing, owning and
operating power plants and transmission.

? The best solution ) recognized across the country and around the world ) is
for the state to allow private companies to site new generation immediately.

? Once built, California could easily enter into contracts with private power
plant developers and avoid using taxpayers, dollars.

? Given government,s other failed experiments in other large scale
participation into public power, like TVA, BPA, NYPA, it is highly unlikely
that a California state agency will succeed in doing something that private
capital is better equipped and willing to do.

? In the short, the proposal is neither in the public interest nor rational.

? Issuing debt to build power plants and take over transmission systems costs
consumers money and takes money away from investments in schools and other
important priorities.

? We would be willing to work with the Legislature to help craft a bill that
gets more supply in California quickly, efficiently, and in an
environmentally sound manner, but this draft achieves only one goal:
creating more bureaucracy.


Following is the text of an email announcing the simulation, which I intend to send out first thing in the morning to all UBS Warburg Energy employees (i.e. Houston-based UBS employees), as per John Lavorato's request. If you have any comments, please email me by 8:00 am CST.

Thanks,

Dave

We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


Barbara,

Yes, ECT does not exist any longer. It's safer to say
the seminar is sponsored buy Enron Corp. WE have a reorganization every
three months.

Vince

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 01/27/2000 03:23:08 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: sponsorship

Vince:

I just realized that I am still saying that the seminar series is sponsored
by Enron Capital and Trade Resources.  Should I change that to Enron North
America?

Thanks.

bbo


could you please look into this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
06/23/99 02:03 PM ---------------------------

	Declined
Declined by: Lisa Mellencamp
Chairperson: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor
Sent by: Linda J Simmons

Start: 06/24/99 10:00 AM
End: 06/24/99 11:00 AM

Description: Meeting-Set off issues, EB38C1

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).
Meeting Dates:

Detailed description:
   Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT declined your invitation.

On   06/24/99 10:00:00 AM CDT
For   1 hour
With:   Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT (Chairperson)
  William S Bradford/HOU/ECT (Invited)
  Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT (Invited)
  Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT (Invited)
  Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT (Declined)

Meeting-Set off issues, EB38C1


Okay. Thanks. We will work on JPM Chase.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kean, Steven J. [<mailto:steve.kean@enron.com>]
Sent: 26 November 2001 00:39
To: Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen; Steve Lipin; Michael Buckley
Subject: RE: first draft of release attached

My comments

-----Original Message-----
From: Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:14 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen
Subject: FW: first draft of release attached

this is apparently falling apart as I type this.  For your reading
pleasure, I send the attached.
-----Original Message-----
From: steve lipin [<mailto:stevelipin@hotmail.com>]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:46 PM
To: deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject: first draft of release attached

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
<http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************

This email is sent by Brunswick Group Limited, 16 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3ED (also the registered office). The company is registered in England (No. 2094879).

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete this E-mail.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.


Vince,
It was a pleasure to meet you last week at our Rodeo night.  I am glad you
could join us.

I am going to fax you the invitation to the Houston Symphony Partners party
that we discussed.  I hope you can attend.

Keep in touch and let's get together for lunch and/or seeing "American
Beauty."

Jana Phillips
713-658-9296


Attached please find the translated news clips from Bolivia (February 29).


Here it is.  Let me know if you have any questions.

dp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sonnonstine, Max
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Redline guaranty

Good Afternoon,
	How's that redline guaranty coming for Mountaineer Gas?  Tom Brown?  Just doing my daily check-in.

Thanks,

Max


When will the buybacks and swings be set up for July?  I am a little
concerned with the long weekend coming up.  I believe that we agreed that
these would be set up by the 3rd work day, which would be Friday the 7th.
(Six days of flow.)  I definitely don't think that we should any later.  It
would be great if this could be handled sooner, miimizing our economic impact.

Additionally, we need to get the Industrial spreadsheet up and running
again.  This report is very beneficial to Gas Control, industrial traders and
schedulers on call.

Let me know what you think.

D


Dave - my comments are below in red.  I'm assuming that "end of the day" is
the end of the trading day, but this seems a bit ambiguous since the trader
in Japan may be thinking about a different "day" than the trader in London,
etc.  Will the orders be cancelled if our trader removes a product during the
day and then reactivates it?

	David Forster@ENRON
	08/21/2000 05:57 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Price Limit Order Language

Mark,

Further to our conversation today; How is this?

You have offered a price limit order for aaa mmbtus of yyyyy at a price of
xxx. If the price you specified becomes available on EnronOnline, the system
will automatically try to fill your submission and a transaction may result.
Your submission may be filled partially or completely depending on the volume
available. This submission will remain active until for the earlier of (i) xx
hours and yy minutes from your submission, or  (ii) until you cancel it (by
highlighting it and pressing the cancel button on the main screen), or (iii)
the end of the day. The submission  will not be withdrawn by your logout.
Price limit orders are processed by price and then by timestamp. Therefore,
if other price limit orders for the same price have been submitted before
yours, then they will be filled before your submission is filled. This can
result in other transactions completing at the same price as your price limit
order, while your price limit order does not complete.


sorry i didn't call you back on sat.  i had a date that night.


When: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECN38C1

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

meeting requested by Sheri Luong


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy for 8/8/00

The redeliveries will be 0 as well.

 The over-delivery quantity for the Fuels Cotton Valley gas will be valued per
paragraph 3 of the Contract Price section in the Transaction Agreement.


not to announce promos.

John L Nowlan
01/11/2001 11:59 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Org announcement

Could I announce the various promo's across the group in this announcement
also?


I would like to pull together a relatively small group of people to discuss and address issues and opportunities that impace Global Accounting.  This group will have a working session every other week on Tuesday beginning May 15. (These are the Tuesday's that the CAO staff meeting does not take place).   The meetings will be held in 50M03 and will start at 8:30 and last approximately one hour

Please contact me with any questions.  If you will not be able to attend, please call Sharron at x37094.  Thanks.

The members of the Global Accounting Steering Committee are:
Rick Causey
Sally Beck
Bob Butts
Wes Colwell
Fernley Dyson
Rodney Faldyn
Rod Hayslett
Bob Hermann
Kevin Hughes
Phillip Lord
Allan Sommer
George Wasaff


Got the tickets today for Faith Hill-mark your calendar for Oct 13-starts at
8:00   Tina Turner is Sunda7-Oct. 29


Attached is the due diligence review summary prepared by the legal asset
groups for the West Texas Assets at the KN Data Room.  Steve is continuing to
review the information on the gathering/processing portion and we will update
as info is available.


I put in an offsetting trade for the phys/financial swap.  You will have to
process three confirmations to get it done 2 offsetting phys and 1
financial.

Pete


I believe this deal was changed, bu tnot changed correctly.  The hours are
doubled up and it is running 32 hours a day.

Thanks!


I have received several questions from the floor regarding the subject topic.  Here is what I know as of 2:00 today.  This is an evolving process.  Please distribute this note as appropriate:

All movement of 'data' from Enron to UBS is subject to legal approval.  Legal is developing policy guidelines that will govern what and how much data individual users and the IT department can move.

Data can be defined as application data (source code, executables, scripts, etc...), business data (curves, prices, deals, weather forecasts, etc...), and office documents (spreadsheets, word files, etc...)

Data is housed in many different places, including desktop C drives, individual network H drives, common file servers (O/M/R/W drives), database servers, application servers, and web servers.

Several steps have already been completed:

The physical file server environments for UBS have been established.
The physical DB server environments for UBS have been established.
The physical application and web server environments for UBS have been established.
Some file server directories have already been copied.  This was limited to data (executables, risk excel sheets, etc...) necessary for IT to test our critical applications in the new UBS production environment.
Our large EnPower and TDS Oracle databases were also copied for application testing.

Where do we stand?

I am maintaining, and have distributed to this group, an inventory of all software and hardware components associated with our Power application portfolio.  The inventory includes specific common file server directories that are necessary for our Power apps to run.  We have received input from several business owners in this area.
Legal and IT are collaborating on a process for moving file server data. (H/O/M/R/W)  We are expecting a process definition within days, given our Day 0 target of February 6th.  (legal integration date)
At this time, it sounds like individual UBS employees will participate in identifying files on the various file server drives listed above and signing a document specifying that that data movement adheres to legal policy guidelines.  Individuals may even be asked to physically move (drag and drop) files from the old Enron drives to UBS holding drives.  This is still under discussion.
We have made some basic assumptions about the amount of business data to be moved to UBS.  I have provided Tim, Kevin, and Lloyd an overview of these assumptions.  This is also still under discussion.

I will schedule a meeting in the next couple of days to discuss this, and other transition issues, in more detail.

Thanks, Steve


Your message

  Subject: Model for 4/6

was not delivered to:

  rhawk1@epelectric.com

because:

  User rhawk1 (rhawk1@epelectric.com) not listed in public Name & Address Book

 - C.DTF
Received: from postmaster.enron.com ([192.152.140.9])          by
mail.epelectric.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.6a)          with SMTP id
2001040706491852:16994 ;          Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:49:18 -0600
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id
f37CnH620604; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:49:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f37CnGL18130; Sat,
7 Apr 2001 07:49:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2713a52c41ff6cd@nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001
07:49:07 -0500
Subject: Model for 4/6
To: kpeterso@epelectric.com, rhawk1@epelectric.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFFB624550.F9DE44C1-ON88256A27.004560B7@enron.com>
From: Steven.Merris@enron.com
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 05:40:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 04/07/2001 07:45:11 AM, Itemize by SMTP Server on
MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 04/07/2001 06:49:29 AM,
Serialize by Router on MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at
04/07/2001 06:49:33 AM
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
Boundary="0__=88256A27004560B78f9e8a93df938690918c88256A27004560B7"
Content-Disposition: inline

(See attached file: 4_06act.xls)
 - 4_06act.xls


Dave

I'm thinking of hiring Kim Hillis.

I would like your opinion.

Lavo

713-853-7991


you STILL there?!


Shmuel:
Flattered that you would ask.  I should be able to participate.  Let's
discuss further.  Give me a call.  415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff

	"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu>
	02/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fw: IEEE Summer meeting

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu>
To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: IEEE Summer meeting

>
> Dear Jeff
> I am Organizing a Panel at the IEEE Summer Meeting in Vancouver July 15-19
> on the California electricity crisis: cause, remedies and prevention. The
> idea is to have different perspectives e.g. operations, market power,
demand
> side response, supply, regulatory etc. I would like to invite you to take
> part in this panel. As someone that was intimately involved in the
> restructuring you could provide an invaluable regulatory and political
> perspective on how did we get into this and how can we get out. At this
> point I have commitments from Fluckiger of the CAISO, Ed Kahn, Ward
Uggerud
> CEO of Otter Tail Power Company, Gary Ackermann, Executive
Director-Western
> Power Trading Forum and I am waiting for a commitment from Vikram Budraja.
>
> Regard, Shmuel Oren
>


I like it....

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 05:23 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Profit Calc Issue

Kay,

Regarding calculation of the profit, can we add the caviot that "a more
comprehensive calcuation of the profit would be agreed to by the parties in
the definitive agreement."??


For those of you who might be working on LM6000 transactions, there is a
rough cut of a standardized Financial Model and a old Capital Cost
Configuration Model that you can use for current/future LM6000 projects. Both
of them are saved as read-only at o:/naes/from_ko_LM6000/control. If you do
not have access, please compose a Security Request via Lotus Notes.

Please note that there are still work to be done on both models. If you are
assigned with any LM6000 models, please keep me in the loop, and I can fill
you in on the model progress and process.

Thanks.

Clement Lau
x3-9446


Okay so, five hours at work and so far no fallout from christmas party
shenanigans!  This is going better that expected.


Thanks..

We should know something about the well we are currently reentering next week.  Timing on the gathering line is still uncertain.

>>> "Whitt, Mark" <Mark.Whitt@ENRON.com> 10/23 8:33 AM >>>

These are draft versions of the interruptible purchase agreement and
confirm for your gas into Fort Union.  Think about what you what to do
for term, volume etc.  We will then add in the gathering charges.  We
are pretty flexible, so let me know what works for Patina.

Thanks,

Mark

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Nemec, Gerald
> Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:14 PM
> To:	Whitt, Mark
> Cc:	Perlingiere, Debra
> Subject:	Patina Oil & Gas Docs.
>
>  <<Patina Oil  Gas Confirm.doc>>  <<Patina Oil  Gas.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************