Daren,

KCS wants to take their nom down from 6,500 to 5,700 on the gathering and
increase the Texaco transport by the same volume at meter # 9658 beginning
today.  Are you okay with the change?

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 09:22
AM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 03/27/2001 03:52:45 PM
To: "Bob Cotten (E-mail)" <Robert.Cotten@enron.com>
cc: "Tom Acton (E-mail)" <Tom.Acton@enron.com>, Stretch Brennan
<djb@kcsenergy.com>, Knox Westmoreland <rkw@KCSEnergy.com>
Subject: FW: 2nd rev/ HPL nom. eff. March 28, 2001

Sorry about the confusion on the dates between the subject line (correctly
reflected) and the body of the letter (incorrectly reflected)...the change
for the "shift" between Texaco and KCS should be March 28, 2001.

Bob Withers  <* )) >><
KCS Energy, Inc.
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
Voice 713-964-9434   Fax 713-877-1394

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Bob Withers
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Bob Cotten (E-mail)
Cc: Tom Acton (E-mail); Stretch Brennan; Knox Westmoreland
Subject: 2nd rev/ HPL nom. eff. March 28, 2001

This is a revised Josey Ranch nomination for the month of March 2001.  The
HPL nomination volume to be effective 3/28/2001 is:

      5,700 MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
(800 MMBtu/d decrease)
     2,000 MMBtu/day for TEXACO
(800 MMBtu/d increase)
     7,700 MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.083
@ 14.65 dry) ==> ZERO "net" change

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers  <* )) >><
KCS Energy, Inc.
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
Voice 713-964-9434   Fax 713-877-1394


Approved.
John Nowlan will make sure that someone from Net Works sees it as well so if
they get a call they can discuss it.
m


_________________________________________________________________

F O O L W A T C H
Monday, December 11, 2000

alewis@ect.enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

Close    Change  %Change

FOOL 50   1,781.23   +17.02   +0.96%
DJIA     10,725.80   +12.89   +0.12%
S&P 500   1,380.19   +10.30   +0.75%
NASDAQ    3,015.10   +97.67   +3.35%
(Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

SPONSORED BY: American Express
Why invest with American Express? Exceptional financial
planning tools, round-the-clock customer service and low
commission trading. Trade online with a company you know
and trust!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239251

FOOL ON THE HILL: GE AND JACK WELCH'S LEGACY
Will the recent class of GE-bred leaders make Jack proud? We're
about to find out.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239252

FOOL FOUR: FAREWELL, FOOLISH FOUR
Find out why Tom and David Gardner are saying goodbye to the
Foolish Four strategy.  It's all in the data.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239253

RULE MAKER: MICROSOFT'S LONG-TERM MUSCLE
Matt Richey argues that the market is offering one of world's
greatest companies at a very reasonable price.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239254

RULE BREAKER: WHICH BIOTECHS WILL FAIL?
The key to survival in the biotech game is a company's ability
to develop its own drugs.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239255

RETIREMENT: LOST RETIREMENT DOLLARS
Leaving your old job? Don't take your retirement distributions
and run -- it could cost you big bucks.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239256

TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Get the scoop on the embedded systems market, Teligent's new
funds, and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239257

FOOLISH 8: SMALL-CAP FEARS
What should a small-cap investor fear most? Mistakes, not
illiquidity.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239258

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, MP3.COM, AND SEMI-INSTANT KARMA
Universal Music is hit with a copyright infringement suit, while
My.MP3.com takes the pay-for-play route.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239259

COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE: DOCOMO I-MODE: WILL IT TRANSLATE?
NTT DoCoMo makes no secret of its plans to expand i-mode
abroad.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239260

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
Join our discussions about Nokia vs. Qualcomm, Amazon.com, and
more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239261

FRIBBLE: A COUPLE'S CHRISTMAS
Do you and your loved one stress during the holidays? Check out
a Fool's tips for enjoying the season.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239262

DAILY DOUBLE: COORS BREWS A DOUBLE
Thirsting for stability in this volatile market? You may want
to make a beer run.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239263

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: IBM, INTEL ANNOUNCE CHIP ADVANCES
Intel's transistors will be three atoms thick.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239264

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239265
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239266
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239267
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239268
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239269

SPONSORED BY: American Express
Why invest with American Express? Exceptional financial
planning tools, round-the-clock customer service and low
commission trading. Trade online with a company you know
and trust!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239270

GET A HEAD START ON 2001
Start your investing research now with Industry
Focus 2001. Available in electronic download or hard copy.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239271

FREE PREVIEW OF WIRELESS 201
Get a sneak peek of this best-seller at Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239272

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=alewis@ect.enro
n.com

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239273

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-27682-2000-12-11_18-32-43-667638_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-18:59:59(12-11
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com


Please call me at x30681 prior to installation.

Kim

Hector Ruiz
08/11/2000 09:24 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Cedric Belt/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: The delivery of the equipment you ordered is scheduled.

--- Automatic Notification System ( Request #: ECTH-4N3MHD )
Requested For: John J Lavorato
Requested By:  Cedric Belt

Your order (see below) has been assigned to Isabel Gaona. Technician will
contact you for information and delivery time. Please contact the technician
if you have any question.

EN 6600 128MB INSTALLED IN DESKTOP
EN 6600 128MB INSTALLED IN DESKTOP


TO FIND OUT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHETHER THIS PROGRAM IS ELIGIBLE FOR CLE
CREDIT IN YOUR STATE CLICK HERE:
http://www.celesq.com/index.asp?cat=19906

Hi,

Earn three hours of CLE credit in Ethics by reading this course, Ethical
Concerns for Corporate Counsel, by Robert J. Anello, Esq. & Catherine Foti,
Esq.(see link below), and completing the Affirmation of Self-Study.  Mail
your Affirmation with a check for $59.  You will receive a CLE Certificate
of Completion from Celesq within three weeks.  If you wish to have quicker
turnaround of your certificate, please call us at 800/989-3834.  Click here
to view this course:
http://www.celesq.com/index.asp?cat=18373

Special Platinum Subscription offer -
Because you are In-House Counsel, you are eligible for a special discount
pricing offer. Click here for details:
http://www.celesq.com/index.asp?cat=19735

For more information and/or to review our complete course catalog, please
visit:
http://www.celesq.com/index.asp?cat=19735.

For your convenience, you will receive a different CLE course delivered
right to your e-mail box monthly at a discounted price.

Sincerely,

customer.care@celesq.com
561/241-1919

-------------------

This email was sent to Gerald.Nemec@enron.com. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please reply to this e-mail and type remove in the subject
line.


20k off HPL @ Eastrans effective JULY 26, 2000

Redelivered @

Mobil Beaumont           12200
FCV                                         7800
TOTAL                           20000

Thanks,
Chad Cass


All deals with NP-15 or SP-15 delivery points should use CAISO energy.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/05/2001 02:37 PM
---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
03/05/2001 01:58 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Delano #536366, & #536370, and EESI #525625.2

Please let me know whether these deals have the wrong energy type.  They all
have np-15 or sp-15 delivery points.
Thank you!
Kim


Please find attached the User's Manual for Options Trading
Let me know if you have any questions,
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705


Rick -

attached is an updated RCR budget status report for your review and files

Eric


Just a reminder about today's meeting...It's at 2:30 p.m. in Conference Room 47C2....Hope you can make it...

Emily Sellers
Enron Transportation Services Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB4771
Houston, Tx 77001713) 853-7172
(713) 646-2738

esellers@enron.com <mailto:esellers@enron.com>


I saw a job posting for a Power Trader (24-Hr real time) in the Enron
intranet and I was wandering if we could meet to discuss further.

I have been with Enron for about a year doing power origination and trading
in Latin America. I recently moved back to the US and have been working with
EES for a couple of months. Before Enron I worked a few years in PSEG trading
and Constellation Power Source, but not as a trader. I know the northeast
(PJM mainly) power markets (24 hour) fairly well. I have always been
interested in getting into the trading business and that's why this position
caught my attention.

I hope you feel there may be a potential match here. If you think so, please
let me know and I can forward you my resume.

Thank you

Ignacio
I


Yes, it is working, you're up early this morning, it's not even noon yet.
You must be feeling good today!


Glad to hear progress is being made.
I went to Vandy but a little later... 1992-5.

"Piasio, Stephen [FI]" <stephen.piasio@ssmb.com> on 01/11/2001 01:27:20 PM
To: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: credit facility

Significant progress was recently made between Enron's and Salomon Smith
Barney's counsels.  We have offered Enron a $50 million facility that can be
used for both original and variation margin.  With these elevated NYMEX
margins, I am sure it will help your P/L.

Our counsel, Bob Klein is meeting with Citibank's attorneys to discuss some
of the small issues where we both share some exposure.

Citibank is one of your lead commercial banks while SSB is one of your lead
investment banks.  The relationship is so sound, we will work out the
wrinkles.  I'll be in touch.

P.S. Someone told me you went to Vanderbilt..any chance 1988-1992ish?


I received a call from John Powell reuqesting copies of the agreements for
transacting on EOL (for the legal department).  He was asking about
arbitration and other items.  He didn't specifically ask for GTC's so you may
want to inquire.  Thanks.  Sara
phone 281/378-1114
fax        281/378-1151


Can you look into this
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 08:11 AM -----

	Janice R Moore
	11/06/2000 12:16 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Document retention, etc.

Have you heard of something called "Track changes"?  It's a WORD feature that
is used -- a lot -- for redlining drafts.  I see it used all the time on
documents that I receive from 3rd parties and I use it myself.  It has become
popular because other tools, like CompareWrite and similar software, are not
compatible w/ more recent versions of WordPerfect and WORD, so changes are
often missed in marked drafts.
I learned during a recent visit at my old law firm that that they've
forbidden use of "Track Changes" and are advising their clients to do the
same b/c the past changes never go away and can be retrieved forever by
someone who knows anything about word processing technology.  Which makes for
interesting results in document discovery..... among other things.  Just
thought I'd pass this along.

Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)


i thought you sniffed that stuff on the weekend for fun anyway


Tana, I spoke with Steve Castleberg last week (3/2).  We have closed out this
application since Alliant Energy Corporation is already approved with an
execute ID and Steve Castleberg is a user under that entity.  After speaking
to him, he will access the site using his current ID under Alliant Energy
Corporation.  Thanks.

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter; Sacks, Edward
Cc: Sever, Stephanie
Subject: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc. as authorized agent for IES
Utilities, Interstate Power and Wisconsin P&L

The fellow from Alliant keeps calling me to check on the status of his access
to EnronOnline.  We received the executed ETA Amendment about 3 weeks ago and
he is really hot to trade.  Can you give me some estimate of when we can
expect to get him out of Credit, or call him if there are some credit
issues?  His name is Steve Castleberg and his ph: is 608/877-8207.  Thanks!


April 8, 2001, 10:45PM

                           Learn the ins and outs of filing after mid-April
deadline

                           By GARY KLOTT
                           Tribune Media

                           For the many millions of individuals who have yet
to file their 2000 income tax returns, there is no
                           reason to panic.

                           If you need more time to file your return, you can
easily get a filing extension.

                           And if you can't afford to pay your tax bill now,
you can buy more time to pay up. While you may be
                           subject to interest and penalties for payments
made after April 16, you can put off the day of
                           reckoning for months without fear that IRS
collection agents will come after you. There is even a
                           loophole in the law that will enable many
individuals to get an extra month to pay up without being
                           assessed interest or penalties.

                           Nevertheless, April 16 is a critical deadline for
anyone who has yet to file his tax returns. You'll need
                           to file either your tax return or an extension
request by the deadline. And to avoid interest and
                           penalties, you'll generally need to pay any taxes
owed by April 16.

                           April 16 is also the deadline for making IRA
contributions for 2000 returns and for making the first
                           installment of quarterly estimated taxes for 2001.

                           Filing extension: If you'd like more time to file
your return, getting a filing extension is simple. In fact,
                           the IRS has expanded the options this year for
obtaining a filing extension. You can now do it by
                           phone, computer or mail.

                           The traditional way to get an extension is to fill
out IRS Form 4868, "Application for Automatic
                           Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income
Tax Return" and mail it to the IRS by the April 16
                           deadline. If you're using tax-preparation software
or a tax professional, you can file your extension
                           request by computer. Or you can phone in your
extension request by calling 888-796-1074.

                           If you owe the IRS money, another option for
requesting an extension is to make the payment by
                           credit card (American Express, Discover or
MasterCard) on the Internet or by phone through one
                           of the two companies the IRS has authorized for
processing credit card payments. Details on the
                           option are included in the Form 4868 instructions.

                           By making the extension request, the IRS will
automatically give you four more months, until Aug.
                           15, to file your return.

                           You can get an extension for any reason. No
explanation is asked for when requesting an extension.

                           But be aware that your extension request only
gives you extra time to file your return, not to pay
                           your taxes. To avoid interest and possible penalty
charges, you must estimate how much you owe
                           and make the payment with your extension request
by the April 16 deadline.

                           Unable to pay: If you can't afford to pay your tax
bill, you should at least file an extension request by
                           the April 16 deadline.

                           Though you'll be subject to interest and possible
penalty charges for late payment of your taxes,
                           you'll avoid being hit with a late-filing penalty,
which runs a steep five percent a month (up to a
                           maximum 25 percent.)

                           Installment plan: If you still don't have the cash
to pay your taxes by the time your extension runs out
                           on Aug. 15, you can negotiate with the IRS to pay
your balance due in monthly installments. You
                           make the request for an installment agreement when
you file your completed tax return using Form
                           9465, "Installment Agreement Request."

                           "Offer in compromise": If you can't afford to pay
all you owe in taxes, even in installments over a
                           period of years, you may be able to work out a
settlement with the IRS. The IRS recently expanded
                           its "Offer in Compromise" program, in which
taxpayers in tough financial situations can offer to settle
                           for less than they owe. Offers are submitted using
IRS Form 656, "Offer in Compromise."

                           A loophole offers an extra month to pay up: If all
you need is an extra month or so to come up with
                           the cash to pay your tax bill, there is a way you
may be able to get a short reprieve without being
                           subject to interest or penalties.

                           All you need do is take the IRS up on its offer to
calculate your tax bill for you.

                           If you're eligible for the offer, fill out your
tax return, stopping short of computing certain totals, and
                           send it in by April 16. The IRS will compute your
tax and send you a bill for any tax owed. If you
                           pay within 30 days of the notice, you won't be
assessed any penalties or interest.

                           To take advantage of the loophole, your taxable
income must be less than $100,000 and you can't
                           itemize deductions. The full list of eligibility
requirements and step-by-step instructions are contained
                           in IRS Publication 967, "The IRS Will Figure Your
Tax."

                           Retirement account contributions: If you hope to
contribute to an Individual Retirement Account, the
                           final deadline for 2000 tax-year contributions is
April 16, even if you obtain a filing extension.

                           The deadline is more flexible for self-employed
retirement plans. Contributions to Keogh or
                           Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) plans can be
made up until the due date of your return, which
                           can be later than April 16 with a filing
extension.

                           Estimated tax deadline: For self-employed workers
and other individuals who need to make
                           quarterly estimated tax payments to the IRS, April
16 also is the deadline for making the first
                           installment for 2001.


-----Original Message-----
From: Manuel, Erica [mailto:Erica.Manuel@edelman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Allen, Stevan; AReM; Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail); Fairchild,
Tracy; Frank; Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail); Manuel, Erica; Megan
Beiser; Norm Plotkin; Warner, Jami
Subject: San Diego Union-Tribune: Rush to beat direct-access purchase
ban spurs fear

This article specifically mentions the threatened lawsuit by AREM as having
caused the PUC to drop its proposed order to ban direct access
retroactively.
Rush to beat direct-access purchase ban spurs fear
By Ed Mendel
STAFF WRITER
September 12, 2001
SACRAMENTO -- Some utility customers, mainly businesses, are rushing to sign
contracts with generators for cheaper power before regulators enact a
long-delayed ban, raising concern that costs may go up for the remaining
customers.
The state plans to ban "direct access" contracts with generators to keep
customers with utilities in order to help pay for power bought by the state
since January. Those state purchases will be covered in part by a $12.5
billion bond paid off by ratepayers over 15 years.
But many businesses, which say they need cheaper power now to remain
competitive, are signing contracts to bypass the utilities before the Public
Utilities Commission bans direct-access pacts, an action that could come as
soon as tomorrow.
"We have seen a significant increase in the last month," said Ed Van Herik,
a spokesman for San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
He said the amount of the annual SDG&E power load shifted to direct-access
contracts with generators increased from 10 percent at the end of July to
17.4 percent at the end of last month.
Allowing customers to shop around for cheaper power was the main promise of
the state's failed attempt to deregulate electricity. But when the utilities
ran up huge debts and could no longer borrow, the state began buying power
for utility customers in January.
To avoid harming the economy with a massive rate increase, the state decided
to spread out payment of the soaring cost of wholesale power by obtaining
decade-long power contracts and issuing the $12.5 billion ratepayer bond.
Now the state wants customers to remain with the utilities for two reasons:
paying their fair share of the state-subsidized power received earlier this
year and preserving a ratepayer base large enough to pay off the long-term
contracts and the bond.
The power provided by the state to utility customers looked like a bargain
earlier this year, when prices on the wholesale market skyrocketed while the
state raised rates for the customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and
Southern California Edison by about one-third.
The state has not raised rates for SDG&E customers. But an increase
averaging 12 percent for SDG&E residential customers is on the PUC agenda
tomorrow, along with several other actions that may be taken to pave the way
for issuing the $12.5 billion ratepayer bond.
PUC President Loretta Lynch said that before wholesale power prices began
soaring last year, about 16 percent of the power provided by the three
investor-owned utilities was being bought through direct-access contracts.
By last March, she said, the amount dropped to 1 percent.
"Certainly, the direct access tanked because the marketers dumped their
customers back on the utilities when the price rose last year," Lynch said.
But as wholesale power prices dropped in June, direct-access contracts began
to look like a better deal, and a number of customers have left the
utilities to get cheaper power.
At Southern California Edison, the number of customers with direct-access
contracts grew from 32,547 on June 21 to 37,718 by the end of last month --
an increase of 5,171, said Steve Hansen, an Edison spokesman.
"Now that the market has turned, everyone is bailing as fast as they can,"
said Mike Florio of The Utility Reform Network, a San Francisco-based
consumer group.
Most of the electricity obtained through direct-access contracts in recent
months apparently has been bought by businesses that use large amounts of
electricity.
"Most of the providers which serve small customers have simply stopped doing
business in the state," said PUC Commissioner Carl Wood, who with Lynch
outlined the PUC's proposed actions at a Capitol news conference late last
month.
The PUC delayed action to ban direct-access contracts, waiting for the
Legislature to act on proposals that would have allowed businesses to bypass
the utilities if they paid an "exit fee" to cover their share of
state-subsidized power.
The ban on direct-access contracts originally proposed by the PUC would have
been retroactive to July 1. But the retroactive provision was reportedly
dropped after a lawsuit was threatened by the Alliance for Retail Energy
Markets, a group of power marketers.
In the Legislature, a provision allowing utility customers to obtain
direct-access contracts beginning in 2003, if they pay exit fees, was added
to the Assembly version of a plan passed last week to keep Edison from
joining PG&E in bankruptcy.
The addition of the direct-access provision is one reason that the Assembly
version of the Edison plan is supported by the California Chamber of
Commerce. But the Assembly plan pushed by Gov. Gray Davis faces opposition
in the Senate.
Senate President Pro Tempore John Burton, D-San Francisco, said the Senate
would send an Edison bill back to the Assembly after making it a
"less-egregious giveaway" to the utility.
The main provision in the Assembly plan would allow Edison to eliminate most
of its debt by issuing $2.9 billion in bonds that would be paid off by
ratepayers.
The Foundation for Consumer and Taxpayer Rights, a consumer group in Santa
Monica, calls the Edison plan a "bailout" and is threatening to place a
measure on the ballot that would ask voters to overturn the plan should it
be approved by the Legislature and governor.
And TURN, the San Francisco consumer group, says the Assembly version of the
Edison rescue plan is more generous to the utility than a tougher plan
approved by the Senate in July and giving Edison an additional $1.8 billion.

The consumer group also says the direct-access provision in the Assembly's
Edison plan has "major loopholes" that would allow large customers to leave
the utilities without paying their fair share of state power costs.
"TURN opposes the reintroduction of direct access, because any 'savings'
that are claimed to occur are really nothing more than the result of cost
shifting to those who do not or cannot abandon utility service," the
consumer group said in a statement.
Copyright 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.

Erica Manuel
Edelman Worldwide / Sacramento
916/442-2331 phone
916/447-8509 fax
erica.manuel@edelman.com


well.
now that i've got your interest....

hello and hi and i'm still unemployed but working as
location scout (for free) on a short independant film
that my friend joe bini is directing... and we need a
couple of interior shots that would take one day to
film...

would you be interested in letting us taking over your
place for one day? it's a rather invasive thing,
having a movie shot in one's home, but it would only
be for one day, and everything would be cleaned up
afterwards just like new and fancy....

also, it will probably be a cool little film, as
werner herzog is doing the voice over (for sure) and
may (good possibility) play the lead.

there would be no payment for your graciousness, but
you would get a copy of the film and an invite to the
premier! it will hopefully enter some film
festivals...

thanks for letting me know if you're interested,
and kisses to both of you!!!

colleen

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


If these services are coming over, I think we should consider Goddard in TO for the last commercial position.


Are you referring to the EOP origination?  IT was working on the issue last night and I'll follow up this morning to see what the resolution was.  That information did not roll into the DPR.

Rogers Herndon@ECT
05/21/2001 07:21 PM
To:	Jeffrey Jackson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject:	Re: EWS Power East New Deal Report

Jeff -

I think that new deal info may have even rolled into the DPR.  can you check and could you get us a revised new deal report with accurate p&l.

Thanks,
Rogers

Jeffrey Jackson@EES
05/21/2001 02:27 PM
To:	EWS Power East New Deal Report
cc:
Subject:	EWS Power East New Deal Report

<Embedded StdOleLink>


All,

We have seen some symptoms of problems with the voicemail system.

The Problem:
The Message Waiting Indicator (MWT) on the Meridian phones is not lighting for several hours after new messages are received.

What we are doing about it:
I have contacted PGE Telephone Services and they have opened a trouble ticket to have the problem looked into.

The workaround:
If you are expecting messages or if you have not checked your messages in a while because you have not seen the MWT light, please proactively check your voicemail box by dialing x7600, hit the # key for you mailbox, and enter your password.

I will send out an update message when I have more news.

Regards

Dave Steiner
Enron Net Works, LLC
Office - (503)464-3701
Cell - (503)703-1553


Non.


GREENFIELD CAPITAL PROJECTS

Cuiaba Pipeline (Bolivia/Brazil)- Joe Kolb reports that construction in the
Ridges is now proceeding in all areas.  Directional drilling of some of the
Ridges is progressing more slowly than originally anticipated due to the
hardness of the limestone.  Specialists are being called in.  Restoration of
disturbed areas is being accomplished at a rapid pace in anticipation of the
onset of the rainy season.  Joe will be going to inspect the route along with
Edgar Zuleta (Corp EH&S South America) next week.

RioGen/Eletrobolt PPs (Brazil)- Joe Kolb is waiting for a pipeline
reroute-specific conference call to be scheduled (as per the last project
conference call) to discuss the issues.  Joe conferred with Lauren Goldblatt
and John Ayers (Enron SA) and John is working to ensure that the conference
call is scheduled and to ensure that the school/orphanage is avoided.  Bob
Moss will be presenting his route findings to Lauren, Joe, Susan W., John
Ayers, Lisa Alderman (Enron SA), and Keith Micelli on Friday, Oct. 26.

Metgas Pipeline (India) - Joe Kolb reports that the approval of the two
laterals from the Metgas mainline may delay the overall project.  Lauren
Goldblatt offered wise counsel on alternative ways to obtain government
concurrence without having a full-blown public hearing.  The goal is to close
financing by the end of March 2001.  Main controversy is not related to
environmental matters but associated with ROW acquisition.

Powertel - Joe Kolb received considerable information from Annat Jain (Enron
India) on this fiber optic project.  It appears that it will have minimal
environmental impacts because the cable is being suspended aerially from the
existing electric transmission towers and is being buried only at
substations.  Impacts will mainly be from the equipment moving along the
corridor.

ACQUISITIONS

Project Crane (Quebec, Canada and Port Angeles, Washington) - Don Stevens has
been informed that Enron did submit a non-binding bid for Quebec City.  We
are currently in negotiations over the terms of our bid and there is at least
one other bidder still in the hunt.  We won't make it to the next round
unless we can resolve the terms and conditions sticking points. No further
due diligence is planned at this time.

Project INGA (California and Pennsylvania) - Don Stevens reviewed DASH
(draft) from George Schaefer.  Environmental issues have been addressed in
the DASH.

Military Base Privatization (Maxwell AFB/Gunter Annex) -  Joe Kolb provided
direction to Stephan Laroche (Enron OEC) on how to develop information
requested for operating the wastewater systems.  The information related to
tracking waste disposal.

CWT Thermo-Depolymerization - Don Stevens is preparing an environmental
issues matrix for the various feedstocks which may be used in the process.

Project Delta - Don Stevens has completed the review of Dames & Moore's
Preliminary Environmental Reviews of four potential underground natural gas
storage well locations.  The proposed locations are in the states of
Washington, Utah and New Mexico.

Project Toucan -  After meeting with Georgia Pacific management,  Enron is
not interested in the Brunswich, GA site due to the product being
manufactured.  Enron's offer would not be as competitive as others.  Also,
Enron is not interested in the Woodland Mill as it appears that they have
operational issues.  Enron will send a couple of engineers to the site for
review.  Enron will only be bidding on the Leaf River, MS site.  Given the
altered scope, no work is required in evaluating Brunswick.  By November 1,
2000 Enron will decide whether to submit a bid for Woodland.  Georgia Pacific
still requires that binding bids be submitted by mid-November and this date
will apply to both Leaf River and Woodland.  The current schedule has the
management approval process beginning on November 9, 2000.  Don Stevens
conducted a review of documents supplied by Georgia Pacific regarding the
Leaf River site.  Don Stevens will be conducting a due diligence site visit
of the Leaf River facility on October 29 - 30, 2000.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

BMPs - Joe Kolb distributed all three linear facility BMPs to the Enron EH&S
Council for their review.  All comments have been received and evaluated for
the Pipeline BMPs.  Joe Kolb sent the Fiber Optic BMPs to Wilson Dietrich
(EBS) for his review and comments. The Electric Transmission Line BMPs were
sent to Bob Moss (EE&CC) for his review and who passed them on to Dennis
Alexander (EE&CC) for his staff to review.  Initial responses are positive.

EHS Guidelines - The Environmental Sub-Committee (of the EHS Council) will
conduct a review of the Enron EHS Guidelines and lead the effort to revise
them to ensure that they have a broader scope to cover Enron's diverse asset
portfolio (power, pipelines, pulp/paper mills, metal recycling, etc.).  This
effort will include the identification of EHS BMPs and will likely include
the construction BMPs Joe Kolb has been developing.

EHS Intranet Site - Gavin Dillingham continues to work on the EHS intranet
site. The target date for launch of the site is now December 1st. Most
content has been received for the site. We are also waiting on the approval
of the Renewable Portfolio Standard information from the Environmental
Strategies group and the Regulatory and Legislative Reports from Marc
Phillips. These two items should be approved by the end of the week.

Life Cycle Analysis Phase I - A.D. Little has completed their identification
of Enron's products and services.  A meeting will be held either Friday, Oct.
26 or Monday, Oct. 30 to discuss follow-up questions with the business
units.

VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY RELATIONS

Solar Panel Donation - Joe Kolb and Michael Terraso visited  the Armand Bayou
Nature Center last week, discuss their use of the panels, and have agreed to
donate the panels.

Enron Earth Day Festival/Buffalo Bayou Challenge - Joe Kolb and Gavin
Dillingham have developed a proposal for how to implement a possible "Bayou
Challenge," which would be a bayou cleanup activity.  A meeting with
Community Relations folks to discuss the proposal will occur on October
26th.  The Corporate EHS group will participate in a trial run December 8th
to work out the kinks.

ADMINISTRATIVE

Safety Contract Person - Donnie Willmann made offer to contract safety person
to assist in old CALME region.  Contractor has verbally accepted pending
review of contract.  Should start within the next two weeks.

Environmental Award - On Oct. 21 Donnie Willmann accepted an Environmental
Award on behalf of Ken Lay and Enron for their efforts in promoting
environmental awareness and improving the environment in the Houston area.
The award was presented at an Environmental Forum 2000 at the George R. Brown
Convention Center.  The award was presented by Carol Mims Galloway, City
Council Member, District B. Enron was the only company in Houston presented
with an Environmental award.

EUROPE, INDIA and ASIA

Spain Arcos ) Alan Stringer is preparing the Enron Europe Ltd. Construction
Health and Safety and Environmental Management Plan.

Regional Support Co-ordination Team-Europe ) Alan Stringer made a
presentation to Enron Europe explaining the role of EHS Corp. in the Due
Diligence Process emphasizing environmental and social issues.

Enron Metals ) Alan Stringer is preparing  the integration of Enron EHS
guidelines for Enron Metals Europe.  Bal Wong conducted  an EHS inspection
of  Henry Barth Singapore warehouse.  Scott Watson scheduled to conduct EHS
inspection of Henry Barth USA warehouse in California.

Poland, Turkey, UK ETOL ) Alan Stringer continues to work with plant
management in preparing procedures that meet Enron EHS Guidelines.

UK ) Isle of Dogs New Project ) Supporting Engineering Services in
preparation of EIA and IPPC permit application.

CALME

Puerto Rico, San Juan Gas - Donnie Willmann met with the Puerto Rico
Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to finalize the waste characterization plan
for the Feasibility Study and Risk Assessment.  EQB gave verbal approval for
the waste characterization plan.  Characterization will begin Nov. 13.

Panama, San Francisco Site - Bill Curra is currently assisting the
remediation work.

Panama, Bahia Las Minas (BLM) Power Plant -  Bill Curra continues to support
remediation activities at BLM Plant.  No problems have been incurred.
Project is anticipated to be finalized by Nov. 10.  Gus Eghneim is reviewing
proposals for the emission testing work.  Selection of contractor will be
done Oct. 27.  He is also assisting in developing the cleanup work plan for
hydrocarbon contaminated unlined detention basin.

SOUTH AMERICA

Bolivia, GasOriente Boliviano Ltda. - Edgar Zuleta participated in the Owners
Audit and the Emergency Action Plan audit and the Mechanical Completion
task-force The EAP will also apply to the pre-operational activities.

OEC / NORTH AMERICA

2001 Safety Action Plan  -  Scott Watson  competed the OEC Facilities 2001
Safety Action Plan.   The Plan will be presented to Mark Dobler (OEC) and his
staff for approval and implementation at all OEC facilities.

Medical Surveillance & Wellness Program - Scott Watson received protocol
material from Mary Ann Roman De Meza.   He is currently preparing the Medical
Surveillance & Wellness Procedure.

Caledonia & New Albany Plant Facilities - Scott Watson conducted EH&S Audits
at New Albany  and Caledonia Plants on Oct 24 - 27.

Wheatlant Plant, CEMS Standard Operating Procedures - Ramiro Garcia completed
the CEMS Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Emergency Response Plan
(ERP) for Wheatland Plant.   SOP and ERP were submitted to the state on
October 23.  Also submitted the Quarterly Compliance Monitoring/Deviations
Report to the state on October 24.

2000 Peakers, Due Diligence  ) Gus Eghneim is preparing responses to
questions received from potential buyers of the 2000 Peakers.  Responses will
be submitted to Enron legal department.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

INGAA NSR Task Group - Marc Phillips is heading a newly formed INGAA Task
Group on New Source Review. The first conference call for the group is
scheduled for this Friday.

EPA Regulatory Activities - Marc Phillips distributed to Enron personnel a
listing of 88 actions, mostly regulatory, that EPA plans on taking between
now and January 20, 2001. Fourteen of the actions were identified as having
an impact on Enron. This information was presented at the EH&S Council
meeting.

TNRCC Commissioners Work Session - Marc Phillips attended the TNRCC
Commissioner's Work Session where the Commission directed TNRCC staff to lift
the temporary hold on the review of certain New Source Review (NSR) permit
applications. This hold had affected applications for new permits and permit
amendments received after September 18, 2000, which would authorize new
emissions of NOx in the eight-county Houston/Galveston ozone non-attainment
area.

Office and Field Ergonomics Safety Procedures - Russell Tucker issued the
second draft of the proposed "Enron Office Ergonomics Program" safety
procedure and the first draft of the "Enron Field Ergonomics Program -
Construction" safety procedure for review and comment by the members of the
Enron EH&S Council.

Enron Houston Accident and Injury Reporting, Investigation and Recordkeeping
- Russell Tucker assembled the final three forms necessary to complete the
attachments to the "Enron Houston Accident and Injury Reporting,
Investigation and Recordkeeping" procedure commissioned by the Enron EH&S
Safety Sub-council for development. The procedure is awaiting review by
Maryann Roman De Meza, after which it will be released for review and comment
by the Safety Sub-council members.

ADVOCACY

Pipeline Safety Legislation  - While there is still a slim chance that the
Senate (McCain) legislation may be included in a last-minute appropriations
package, most Capitol Hill sources are pessimistic that a bill will be passed
this Congress. The Administration, concerned that it could shoulder the blame
for killing safety legislation in Congress, is planning an "Executive
Action," which will likely take the form of a Clinton Executive Order, paired
with the release of a DOT rule on integrity management for liquid pipelines
(which was expected shortly anyway.)

MTBE Legislation -- S. 2962, which passed the Senate Environment Committee in
September is not expected to be included in any last-minute appropriations
legislation.  The issue will likely be addressed next Congress.  Enron has
secured commitments of several key members of Congress that "transition
incentives" for MTBE producers will be considered along with any legislation
to ban or limit the product.

Clean Air Act/"Multi-Pollutant" Legislation -- it is likely that next
Congress will consider CAA reform legislation, and much attention is already
being paid to approaches to reducing emissions of multiple pollutants (SO2,
NOx, Mercury, CO2) from the electric generation sector while also fixing
problems with the New Source Review program.   Out of concern that merchant
gas generation, distributed generation, energy efficiency and other "clean"
solutions might be left out of the discussions, Jeff Keeler and consultant
Joel Bluestein organized a meeting of environmental groups and competitive
generation companies (PG&E Gen, Calpine, Trigen, NiSource, El Paso) to talk
about the inclusion of clean energy/IPPs in a multi-pollutant bill.   We will
be drafting a legislative solution in the coming weeks so that it can be
circulated with environmental groups, utilities, and eventually Capitol Hill
and new Administration representatives by the start of next Congress.

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE/COMMERCIAL SUPPORT

Clean Air Act/NOx SIP Call Supreme Court Appeal -  The states of Ohio,
Indiana, Alabama, Michigan, South Carolina, West Virginia and Virginia have
petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the NOx SIP call case,
which was upheld in favor of EPA by a federal appeals court earlier this
year.   The states (backed by some industry groups) are hoping that the case
will be linked in the minds of the justices to the EPA's appeal of the NAAQS
8-hour standard case, which will be heard by the Supreme Court on November 6.
(even though one case held for EPA and the other against)   If the Court
decides the two cases are related this could delay a decision until later
next year, and perhaps sway the court into finding against EPA in the SIP
case as well.

Clean Air Act/Energy Efficiency -  Mary Schoen is working on several issues
related to the use of energy efficiency projects to generate tradable
allowances/offsets in NOx control programs.  Indiana is developing its NOx
SIP, and because of the excess of allowances in its budget, would be a prime
target for including energy efficiency set-asides. EES is interested in
creating such a program, and Mary is working with EES and some of its Indiana
customers to advocate the use of energy efficiency projects to meet NOx
reduction targets.  Mary is also working in California to find offsets for
ENA new generation, and has talked with the Bay Area AQMD about using EES
energy efficiency projects to generate offsets.  Stacey Bolton met with the
Center for Resource Solutions, who is developing a "Negawatt" program in PA,
and informed EES who could benefit from participation with commercial
customers in a pilot program.

EES Premium Power Group - The Environmental Strategies team has been working
with EES' new venture into power quality, distributed generation and
reliability to assist them with intelligence about environmental drivers for
their business.  Jeff Keeler introduced EES to DOE and EPA officials working
on power quality issues, as potential sources of information, policy support
and funding.  Mary Schoen is working on a "template" environmental
regulations affecting distributed generation.   Mary is also working to
address a new Texas regulatory proposal that would severely restrict
distributed generation.  Stacey Bolton provided a summary of incentive monies
available for fuel cells and renewable resources.    We expect to provide
substantial support for this EES business as they organize in the next
several months.

California Retail Electric Market -   New Power Company is taking over EES'
residential customers in the California retail market, and Stacey Bolton is
working with NPC to advise them on regulations and reporting procedures
related to the provision of green power products to customers.  Stacey is
also advising NPC on markets in Ohio, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Energy Efficiency/California Pilot Project - SDG&E is looking to create a
pilot project to offer competitive energy providers the chance to take over
some of its residential customers and offer a "bundled" package of energy &
services, including many energy efficiency solutions.   Mary Schoen is
working with NPC on potential business opportunities related to this pilot
program.

Green-E Outreach to Commercial Customers -  Green-E is doing some outreach to
commercial sources about certification under the Green-E program, and Stacey
Bolton has been meeting with Green-E to discuss potential business
opportunities for Enron associated with green power offerings to these
commercial customers.

Climate Change -  Jeff Keeler spoke on a panel at the Forbes Magazine
Environmental Superconference in DC, on the topic of Business Opportunities
related to Climate Change.   Jeff also helped organize a briefing by the
White House and EPA for gas industry representatives, to hear about proposals
related to establishing baselines to show "additionally" under the CDM and JI
mechanisms, which will be a hot topic for discussion at COP 6 in the Hague.


The EnPower database will be down from 4 PM Friday afternoon (6 PM Houston) to 4 PM Saturday afternoon (6PM Houston).  The reason for this is the NETCO/Estate database and hardware split that is occuring this weekend.

You must re-boot your machines following this shut down to access any EnPower applications.

Susan Amador
503.464.8681 office


Money Mail from CNBC

Visit us online at http://www.cnbc.com/mm.html
To cancel or change your subscription options, please
follow the instructions at the end of this message.

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
SAVE up to 75% on Life Insurance. FREE instant Quotes from
top-rated insurance companies. Stop paying too much and
visit ReliaQuote, rated #1 Life Insurance Service on the
Internet!
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMT531&site=http://www.reliaquote.com/termlife/default.asp?sourceid=0290000001000000053

----------------------------------------------------------

Good evening!
Here is your Money Mail for Thursday, May 31.

BUZZ AT THE BELL
Bargain hunters made a comeback try today, but all three
major indexes are still down four days out of the past six.
Recall that only a week ago, we toasted the Nasdaq
Composite's sixth straight higher close. That was 200
points ago.

Investors initially bid stocks sharply higher Thursday,
snapping up shares beaten down in Wednesday's selloff. But
their stamina failed before a serious attempt at last
week's summit could be mounted.

Only the Nasdaq Composite managed a significant move. It
climbed 26 points, or 1.3 percent, to 2,111. The Dow Jones
industrial average rose 39 to 10,912 and the Standard &
Poor's 500 edged up 8 points to 1,256 -- fractional
advances for both.

One hitch might have been this morning's report on weekly
unemployment claims. The government says initial jobless
filings rose for a third straight week, while a measure of
ongoing claims hit a seven-and-a-half-year high. Stocks
usually brush off these erratic weekly labor figures. But
it's hard to ignore bad news three weeks straight.

Adding to economic concerns, a survey of Chicago-region
purchasing managers showed factory activity at
recession-esque levels in May. That's another hint recovery
could be further off than any of us would like to think.

But check your portfolio before you get start feeling too
negative. About two-thirds of S&P 500 stocks rose today,
led by those of cellular-phone companies,
photographic-products firms and health care providers.

Among the biggest losers were publishers, insurance
brokers, restaurants and precious-metals miners.

Scott Gerlach
Managing Editor, CNBC.com

MAJOR INDEXES AND VOLUMES
* Dow Jones Industrials: 10,911.94, up 39.30 or 0.36%
* Dow Jones Transports: 2,945.90, up 44.29 or 1.53%
* Dow Jones Utilities: 393.22, up 4.75 or 1.22%
* S&P 500: 1,255.82, up 7.74 or 0.62%
* NASDAQ Composite Index: 2,110.50, up 26.00 or 1.25%
* Russell 2000: 496.50, up 2.54 or 0.51%
* FTSE: 5,812.90, up 9.00 or 0.16%
* NIKKEI: 13,262.14, down 231.21 or 1.71%
* Ten-Year Treasury Note Yield: 5.39%

* NYSE volume (preliminary): 1.1 billion shares
* Nasdaq volume (preliminary): 1.8 billion shares

* To see our complete U.S. index list,
http://www.cnbc.com/news/markets/world.html?ReferrerID=MM

SCOUTING REPORT: FRIDAY
Brace yourself for some bad news. Those weekly jobless
claims figures that have been sliding of late are about to
get backed up by another weak monthly employment report.
Forecasters think the economy lost about 90,000 jobs in
May, and they expect the unemployment rate to tick up to
4.6 percent. These numbers probably are priced into the
market already, so don't expect the bottom to fall out --
unless the forecasts prove optimistic.

ECONOMIC CALENDAR
*Nonfarm payrolls for May, forecast: -90,000.
*Unemployment rate for May, forecast: 4.6 percent.
*Average hourly wage for May, forecast: +0.3 percent.
*NAPM manufacturing index for May, forecast: 43.7.

STOCKS
* Technical Analysis Mailbag *
Given recent bearish action, the Nasdaq and S&P 500 could
see more downside.
http://www.cnbc.com/010531stevens-stocks.html?ReferrerID=MM

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
GE Prepaid Offers Great Rates On Long Distance.
Only 10c per minute!

Kids away at camp...  Family at the beach... Traveling on
business...  GE Prepaid Virtual Phone Cards is a terrific
way to keep in touch with family and friends.  Only 10c per
minute for all calls in the US.  Buy a GE Prepaid Virtual
Phone Card online and start saving NOW!.  Just click here:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMB531&site=http://www.geprepaid.com/indexPP.jsp?WhoAmI=CNBC

----------------------------------------------------------

TOMORROW ON CNBC
* Squawk Box Guest Host: Lawrence Kudlow, CNBC Economics
Commentator
* To view the latest CNBC guest list:
http://www.cnbc.com/cnbctv/shows/guestlist.html?ReferrerID=MM

HOTSPOTS ON CNBC.COM
* CNBC Store:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MM&site=http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=1064298%26siteid=36208939%26bfpage=cn
* Golf Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/worklife/lifestyle/golf.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Loan Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/loan/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Message Boards:
http://www.cnbc.com/community/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Small Business Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/smallbiz/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Your Portfolio:
http://www.cnbc.com/portfolio/defaultscreen.html?ReferrerID=MM

Please do not reply to this email. It is sent from an
unmonitored address.

To cancel or change your subscription options, please go to
our Money Mail FAQ page
(http://www.cnbc.com/hlp/moneymailhelp.html) and follow the
instructions. If you cannot click on the link, copy and
paste it into your browser.

If you are interested in advertising with CNBC, please go
to our Advertising Info page
(http://www.cnbc.com/common/footerlinks/adsales.html). If
you cannot click on this link, copy and paste in into your
browser.


Ken:

Very shortly after we spoke, I was informed that we had lost the Enron
HomePC Program. This is a great emotional blow to us and I am beyond
disappointed.

We understood that given our recent  strong performance against Dell, they
would do anything to embarrass us in our own backyard.  We have very strong
insight into their intent and knew they would  use this aggressively in
their PR campaigns.

However, clearly it was our job to win the business on the merits of the
individual program and to compete hard for it. We believed that we had a
creative offer on the table that would create great value for your
employees. Obviously, we did not perform to your expectations.

Following is the summary of our activities together which was created before
we heard the news.

I pride myself in developing strong executive relationships with our
customers, and I would welcome the opportunity for us to put our heads
together in order to look for ways we can move the relationships between our
two companies to a higher level.

I also think we should discuss the PR positioning. As a member of our Board,
and as a leader in the Houston community this will be news and I am hopeful
we can find a creative way to balance it.

Again, I accept it was ours to win in the marketplace but regret it had to
come to this. I look forward to your call.

M

From our Enron team:

* EBS Product and Service Supply Agreement

Compaq will continue to honor the Product and Service Supply Agreement
executed on January 18 between EBS and Compaq, whereby Compaq agreed to
purchase broadband services from EBS (on a take or pay basis) in proportion
to EBS' purchase of NT servers and attached storage.  It is also important
to note that we have been actively partnering with EBS on non-contractual
areas, such as our ongoing technical joint development and marketing efforts
around the Windows Streaming Media product.  I understand that our teams
have been working very closely together -- and with Microsoft -- to resolve
technical issues with Windows Streaming Media and thereby speed EBS' market
deployment.

The major issue is that Enron does not support traffic to many of our
concentration point so we need to be creative.

Bottom line, we are down to solvable problems with solution activities
underway.

* Windows 2000

During the last week of May Compaq responded to a request from Enron to
support Windows 2000 deployments, and placed people on site with no defined
contract or process due to Enron's requirements.  At this writing, no
contract has been signed, and the current contract iteration is at number
fourteen.  Apparently the delivery scope has changed several times and there
have been a few mistrals. Compaq is continuing to provide resources despite
the fact that no contract is in place and will work with Enron to ensure a
successful completion of the project.

* Power Management

Jesse Greene, our CFO, will act as the contact point for Enron for power
management services. The issue is we have existing contracts at favorable
rates but we will break the log jam.

* HomePC Program

For several months, Compaq and Enron have been working the solution to bring
technology and Internet access into the homes of every Enron employee.
There have been many creative discussions around hardware and financing to
allow Enron to fully subsidize the package provided.  Compaq, Enron and
Compaq Financial Services had gotten to a point where the $35 per month cap
was going to require the specifications of the hardware to be reduced.  In
recognition of the value of our partnership and our mutual desire for this
program to be the premier program in the industry, we have increased the
specifications of the hardware while taking significant pricing actions and
financing rate reductions.  These actions will actually allow Enron to
support better than expected hardware with the extended warranty for $34.28
per month.   This will truly be an industry-leading program when launched
later this fall.


THEY WILL CONDUCT THE MIGRATION TONIGHT...LOGOFF YOUR COMPUTERS BEFORE YOU LEAVE.

THANKS

TJAE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 8:51 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_UBSW Energy
Subject:	DRAFT:  INFORMATION, Please Read: UBSWE Migration postponed

Due to a variety of circumstances we did not migrate employees to the UBSWE environment tonight (Monday, February 4, 2002). We will communicate further details of the migration plan on Tuesday, February 5, 2002.

Thank you for your cooperation in advance, please contact the Resolution Center at x 3-1411 should you have any questions.

UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042216.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred: -20.00 / Final: -19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:  64.73 / Final:  64.61)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I have two things biting me.

First is time.  I need to turn a draft for Hannon and Rice ASAP.  So,  the
value of a deliberative approach to coming up with a V@R policy will quickly
evaporate if we take 2 weeks to study what the policy should say.

Second,  I have a unique situation.  Our concept of V@R is really unlike the
rest of Enron's today.  What happens today is that network engineers
unilaterally make decisions about deployment, configuration and other matters
which effect the longs and shorts of our asset/contract portfolio that they
view strictly from a network operating standpoint.

A good example was a decision to move our primary TeraPop (three large
servers storing 165 gigabytes each) from Portland to LA.  The servers are
already in place and purchased,  so no capital was involved.  But the
decision has huge ramifications on the future LA/New York and other Bandwidth
usage, and that cost money.  Now it could be that the LA/New York cost is
cheaper than the Portland/New York cost,  the whole point is no one knows.
What our "value-at-risk" policy attempt to corral is these types of decisions
and put them into the hands of the risk management group,  where the decision
will be made with at least some economic work behind it.

I really see the EBS V@R policy to be misnamed,  since we don't really have
the math done to calc V@R.  It really is a volumetric-based control policy
that says you can't make network changes over XX amount of Megabytes (a
storage measure)  or OC-3 equivalents (a bandwidth measure) without Risk
Management making or approving the decision.  I do believe that with
Research's help,  we can in time actually calculate the V@R impact of such
decisions.  At that time,  the policy should be modified to set metrics based
on the V@R calculations.

So if you have an open enough mind to let us co-op your word for a minute,
we need to start turning the minds of the network industry people into
thinking about their decisions as having value effects.  Said directly,
Kevin Hannon has given me authority to write a policy to move control over
significant network changes from the field to the trading floor,  and I am
going to issue something NOW to effectuate that......

So... I really want your views on what we are doing,  but thought you needed
some flavor and an sense of the urgency.  If you can weigh in,  do so
quickly.....

	Barry Pearce
	06/30/00 04:47 AM

		 To: John Echols/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lou Casari/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EBS VaR Transaction Policy

Positive....
----- Forwarded by Barry Pearce/Enron Communications on 06/30/00 04:49 AM
-----

	Ted Murphy@ECT
	06/29/00 11:33 AM

		 To: Barry Pearce/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EBS VaR Transaction Policy

Barry,
Conceptually, I see no reason that a process like this can not be
implemented.  In some way we have attempted to do so through the Enron Corp
Transaction Approval Process (TAP).  I have forwarded to John a copy of this,
along with the Risk Management Policy.   I'll let him share with you if ok (I
really don't want to act as the firm's in-house Kinko's!!).   We have taken
the first step and done poorly on follow-up steps to create a very easy to
follow process for anything other than direct funded capital.  However, some
process around a greater number of assets/deals is better than none.   I
agree that I have not seen a really good fully baked one implemented, but I
think it is wrong not to try.

The only concerns I have is that, given that we want to have "standard"
metrics and approval processes around the firm, EBS creates a process/metric
which is complementary to and integrates with processes/metrics that the
other Business Units are subjected to .
Ted

	Barry Pearce @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	06/29/2000 09:09 AM

To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lou Casari/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Echols/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: EBS VaR Transaction Policy

Hey you guys,

We are trying to implement a 'VaR transaction' policy - and would like your
opinion.

This is going to be tough - because I'm not sure we have implemented a
similiar policy across any of our other 'books' - that is - we looking to
bring in all the accrual/operational assets as well as the MTM stuff
(lambdas). To have a real-live 'configuration' of the system.

If assets/routes/servers etc...are added - what is the impact on the 'value'
of the system and what it's worth.

John has attached a draft below - for your review and thoughts.

I can see how this works in a trading environment - when you actually know
the VaR of your whole trading portfolio. However - I've not seen this done
with a mixture of MTM & accrual assets. Add the spice of a 'operational
system' valuation  - and this will be tough to quantify and model.

Step 1 - configure system and value it
Step 2 - calculate a VaR on this. We will need to do some work here!
Step 3 - calculate the incremental VaR of new deals/amendements/reconfigs etc
- tough....

See what you think?

B.

	John Echols
	06/28/00 05:41 PM

		 To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Barry Pearce/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lou Casari/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Policies

Here is a first rough draft of a "value @ risk" transaction policy.

I would like you to start looking at where we are going on the policy and get
some early thinking going on limits for the V@R.  For example, should we
effectively shut down all server relocations without approval,  or allow some
level of MB of storage to be moved around or reconfigured?

I need some commercial and industry realism for this.  We may need Rick
Paiste or your industry helpers (Marquardt, etc. to help us).

Barry,  Lou,  I need your input.


Attached is an Associated Press (8/22/2000) article about the
California Public Utility cutting rates for most San Diego residents by 43
percent, as well as, approving a rate cut for San Diego's small businesses
and school districts.


I was disappointed,  to say the least, at the return email I received from you so I waited before replying so as not to react in haste. Previously I stuck to facts and did not bring things of a personal nature into the equation. I feel, however, that there are a few things you should know about me and how I have exemplified the ENRON VISION so you can realize why I took this so seriously and why am, to be blunt, ticked off at the resolution.
In the 4 years that I worked on the scheduling desk for Clinton I never missed a day of work.........not one.
I never took vacation during bid week or during tie out time.
Between 96 - 00 I took all but 3 days vacation between the months of May - October so as not to interfere with winter gas operations.
I have had nothing but above average reviews in the past 5 years,  been promoted twice, and received special recognition for working shorthanded through the winter of 99-00.
As you can see I have consistently put ENRON ahead of personal conveniences and strived to do the right thing for the company. I am distressed that the very values Enron holds me to ring hollow with regards to how I have been treated.
Changing vacation rules, be it legally legitimate, does not exemplify INTEGRITYin my eyes!
Not stating a policy change (THERE HAS STILL NEVER BEEN A FORMAL STATEMENT OF THIS CHANGE) does not illustrate COMMUNICATION!
Stating that I will be paid for vacation less any I take between now and the severance date is deceptive at the least and would not constitute RESPECT, EXCELLENCE nor INTEGRITY!
FACT - items 1 - 6 in the original email are 100% true. #2 is of the most significance as the words came from the lips of our HR representative that I would be paid the vacation amount we discussed UNLESS I TOOK ANY VACATION BETWEEN NOW AND JUNE 1st.
FACT - At least 2 people were allowed vacation time off during this transition (Susan Weison, Sheri Wallace)
FACT - If you check my vacation records you will find that I have taken a vacation EVERY YEAR IN MAY. My request was made, like in all previous years, a few weeks before I wanted to take it. HAD I KNOWN THAT THE RULES OF THE GAME WERE GOING TO BE CHANGED I WOULD HAVE MADE MY INTENTIONS KNOWN EARLIER.

In conclusion I do not expect, or even wish for a response. I have enjoyed my time with Clinton Energy and Enron. I have learned much and forwarded my career greatly and for that I am thankful. I just wanted you to know where I am coming from and how an unfortunate situation of severance was turned into one in which I leave being taught a lesson by Enron that does not make me a better person, just a smarter one. This lesson; a spotless record & loyalty to a company means very little. It is better to look out for #1. In the end the company you work for is going to protect their best interests regardless of the rhetoric in their Vision Statement. Thank you for your time.

Respectfully,

Sean Zurbrick

Judy Gray
05/04/2001 09:33 AM
To:	Sean Zurbrick/DUB/EES@EES
cc:	Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Ashley Kerr/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Weithman/DUB/EES@EES, Ken Brooks/DUB/EES@EES, Kriste Sullivan/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	Re: Clinton Energy Vacation Policy & Request

Sean;

Thank you for bringing your concerns to us.  We value the input of our employees, and constantly seek ways to improve the quality of our employee benefits.  After talking to some of the parties involved in this matter and reviewing our vacation policy, we find that your management acted within the scope of its responsibility and within the bounds of our vacation policy.  In addition, we find no evidence of inconsistencies and believe that you and your co-workers at Clinton have been treated equitably and fairly regarding the denial of vacation during this transition period.

In closing, we support the decision to deny vacation requests to the Clinton employees affected by this transition.  Should you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to direct them to your management

Sean Zurbrick
05/01/2001 01:41 PM
To:	Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Ashley Kerr/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Weithman/DUB/EES@EES, Ken Brooks/DUB/EES@EES
Subject:	Clinton Energy Vacation Policy & Request

I have held discussions with Tim Weithman, Ashley Kerr & Ken Brooks (immediate supervisor) regarding a request for vacation for the 3rd or 4th week in May. I have been told recently by both Ms. Kerr as well as Mr. Weithman that those of us being severed from the company are not permitted to take any vacation time between now and June 1st. It would seem that there are several inconsistencies regarding Enron policy as well as how the subject was presented both to the group as well as individually. Below are the inconsistencies I speak of.

During the group meeting in the beginning of April there was no mention of "vacation freezes". The only reference to time that was mentioned was that you must be employed by Enron as of June 1, 2001 to receive the severance package.
During my private discussion, in which both Ms. Kerr and Ms. Gray were present, I was presented with the specifics of the severance package. I specifically remember being asked for my current unused vacation amount. I gave them the amount of 152 hours and was told that I would be reimbursed for that total unless, of course, I took any additional vacation. This implied that regular Enron vacation policies would be in effect. Again, at no time was it presented to me that I was ineligible to take ANY of my earned vacation or that there would be any deviations from normal Enron policy regarding vacation.
At no time has Mr. Weithman, Ms. Gray, Ms. Kerr or any other Enron agent made public a policy of vacation freezes.
At no time were there ever any public or private requests that the plans for those with previously scheduled vacations to be made available to any Enron agent.
I can find nothing in my severance package that states any deviation from the standard Enron vacation policy.
I realize that Enron policy requires vacation approval from the supervising employee. It states in that policy the following:
"An employee's preference for scheduling vacation should be adopted when possible."
"The supervisor must verify that unit staffing needs are met before approving an employee's vacation request."
I am currently still an Enron employee.  I have also verified that staffing needs are met.

In summary, as you can see there are several inconsistencies with regards to the vacation policy for those being severed at Clinton Energy. It more than offends me that I am being prohibited from taken ANY part of the 152 hours of accrued vacation that is, by all accounts, mine to take. This being said, I am formally requesting one last time that I be granted my vacation request during the month of May. Furthermore I would like this approval as soon as possible so that I may make necessary arrangements. As you review this I am consulting an attorney so that I may be advised of my rights regarding this matter.

Thank you,

Sean Zurbrick
614-760-2792

<Embedded StdOleLink>


---------------------- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 11/07/2000
03:08 PM ---------------------------
From: Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA on 11/07/2000 08:08 AM EST
To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Risk Assessment Reporting Memorandum

Please review and come back to me with comments.

tks for your prompt attention.

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
Enron Trading Services Inc
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA on 11/07/2000 08:20 AM -----

	klarsen@mwe.com
	11/03/2000 04:25 PM

		 To: alfred.pennisi@enron.com
		 cc: Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com, ppantano@mwe.com, daron@mwe.com,
darezina@mwe.com
		 Subject: ETS Risk Assessment Reporting Memorandum

Dear Al:
As discussed, attached please find our Memorandum concerning ETS's CFTC risk
assessment reporting requirements.  Included in the Memo is a discussion of
the
information we will need from Enron to file such report.  Thank you.

Best regards,
Kari S. Larsen
McDermott, Will & Emery
600 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Ph:    (202) 756-8374
Fax:  (202) 756-8087
Email:  klarsen@mwe.com

(See attached file: ETS Risk Assessment Report Memo.doc)

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******

For more information on McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY please visit our website at:
http://www.mwe.com/

 - ETS Risk Assessment Report Memo.doc


this is funny.  i just wanted to send it off to you guys before i leave to
cayman.  i hope the weather is good in houston for you guys this weekend.  it
is supposed to be a low of 77 and high of like 87 in cayman.  rough life.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
10:12 AM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 03/27/2001 05:39:29 PM
To: "Ted Leighty" <tedleighty@yahoo.com>, "Pedar Kjesth"
<pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com>, <merlinm@uswest.net>,
<matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "JAKE Istnick" <jakeistnick@hotmail.com>, "David
Shaw" <davidishaw@yahoo.com>, <danielkbrock@hotmail.com>, "Claude.Aldridge"
<Claude.Aldridge@yellowglobal.com>, "Chris Tuttle" <cbtuttle@hotmail.com>,
"Brian Beggs" <brbeggs@hotmail.com>, "Ben Abendroth" <bda76@yahoo.com>,
"Bagby, Joel" <jbagby@caprock.com>, "Andy Patton" <andy.patton@wcom.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

SO TRUE!!
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Lee, Ryan
To: 'ralee@rmi.net'
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:55 PM
Subject: FW: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Zach
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Lee,  Ryan
Subject: FW: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

?
?
Message-ID: <F174Ba1kg3AmsfGdMNF00001bcb@hotmail.com>
From: Steve Renz <steverenz@hotmail.com>
To: salwolf93@yahoo.com, jamesadamic@hotmail.com, johnbucklar@hotmail.com,
cdolan17@hotmail.com, Banjoglass@hotmail.com, joegregg@earthlink.net,
mjmorty@hotmail.com, lakerob@yahoo.com, MWright4u@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:21:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_003_01C0B711.156EBDC0"

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Brett Beezley" <b_beezley@hotmail.com>
To: ALBOULWARE@YAHOO.COM, matha@kumc.edu, TOBLOOMER@YAHOO.COM,
briancboukalik@eaton.com, BRANTPETERSON@HOTMAIL.COM,
Aaron_Brinkman@na.dole.com, bej2147@hotmail.com, PDT2139@aol.com,
cpete26689@aol.com, alexgfranz@hotmail.com, ajennings2@yahoo.com,
jeremiahdavis@teleline.es, JOHNNYWARREN98@YAHOO.COM, mkopes@yahoo.com,
kkrehbiel@kumc.edu, NWARREN48@YAHOO.COM, MTAYLOR7@KC.RR.COM,
steverenz@hotmail.com, forth23@hotmail.com, lakerob@yahoo.com,
mikedrussell@hotmail.com, TRENTMARQUARDT@HOTMAIL.COM,
treyprice_2000@yahoo.com, tennistucker@aol.com, ryan.vanhorn@labone.com,
rossvogel@birch.net, wyatt_22311@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:08:16 -0600

>From: "Jacob Reimer" <jrjhawk@hotmail.com>
>To: jcoffin@ukans.edu, pmcgiffert@hotmail.com, b_beezley@hotmail.com,
>bherrman@eagle.cc.ukans.edu, dardots@aol.com, jgarner77@hotmail.com,
>gizz1dmb@hotmail.com, urdaddy15@hotmail.com, bhagman30@hotmail.com,
>rhymus@aol.com, mcmahonsean@hotmail.com, snewcs@yahoo.com,
>mike_newhouse@hotmail.com, peter.crump@escout.com, kpolian@echelontech.com,
>psak19@hotmail.com, chacer@eagle.cc.ukans.edu, rjwoody@eagle.cc.ukans.edu,
>franksciara@hotmail.com, johnny@genesishealthclub.com,
>tavis.crump@valrad.com, tmcasc1925@aol.com
>Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:52:05 -0600
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Robert Fanelli" <fanelli44@hotmail.com>
>>To: mfanelli@twcny.rr.com, jbarryiipoops@hotmail.com,
>>gizz1dmb@hotmail.com, roepanimal@hotmail.com, jrjhawk@hotmail.com,
>>drc@hotmail.com, jake50k@myvzw.com, billymags@hotmail.com,
>>jtv5407@hotmail.com, melissawilbur@hotmail.com, Timmit1971@hotmail.com
>>Subject: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:06:47 -0500
>>
>>What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>>
>>1.? Women wear high heels to bed.
>>2.? Men are never impotent.
>>3.? When going down on a woman 10 seconds is more than satisfactory.
>>4.? If a woman gets busted masturbating by a strange man, she will not
>>??? scream with embarrassment, but rather insist he have sex with her.
>>5.Women smile appreciatively when men splat them in the face with sperm.
>>6.? Women enjoy having sex with ugly, middle-aged men.
>>7.? Women moan uncontrollably when giving a blowjob.
>>8.? Women always orgasm when men do.
>>9.? A blowjob will always get a woman off a speeding ticket.
>>10. All women are noisy fucks.
>>11. People in the 70's couldn't fuck unless there was a wild guitar solo
>>??? in the background.
>>12. Those tits are real.
>>13. A common and enjoyable sexual practice for a man is to take his
>>??? half-erect penis and slap it repeatedly on a woman's butt.
>>14. Men always groan "OH YEAH!" when they cum.
>>15. If there is two of them they "high five" each other.(and the girl
>>??? isn't disgusted!)
>>16. Double penetration makes women smile.
>>17. Asian men don't exist.
>>18. If you come across a guy and his girlfriend having sex in the
>>??? bushes, the boyfriend won't bash seven shades of shit out of you
>>??? if you shove your cock in his girlfriend's mouth.
>>19. There's a plot.
>>20. When taking a woman from behind, a man can really excite a woman by
>>??? giving her a gentle slap on the butt.
>>21. Nurses suck patient's cocks.
>>22. Men always pull out.
>>23. When your girlfriend busts you getting head from her best friend,
>>??? she'll only be momentarily pissed off before fucking the both of
>>??? you.
>>24. Women never have headaches... or periods.
>>25. When a woman is sucking a man's cock, it's important for him to
>>??? remind her to "suck it".
>>26. Assholes are clean.
>>27. A man ejaculating on a woman's butt is a satisfying result for all
>>??? parties concerned.
>>28. Women always look pleasantly surprised when they open a man's
>>??? trousers and find a cock there.
>>29. Men don't have to beg.
>>30. When standing during a blowjob, a man will always place one hand
>>??? firmly on the back of the kneeling woman's head and the other
>>??? proudly on his hip
>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Jeff,

FYI, I just got this from Tom.  We don't have a very big opportunity here!
Tom did tell me that his numbers were going to be difficult to get.  Not that
i don't want to put $5 trillion on our chart, but what do you think we should
put as market size?  Nat gas, power and our existing verticals only?  What do
you think?

He is the only one to give me a number yet.  I am going to discuss it at the
staff meeting.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
07:47 AM ---------------------------

Thomas D Gros@ENRON
07/12/2000 04:33 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CommodityLogic Big Numbers

Mike,

Please find attached my initial attempt at 100,000-foot-level numbers for
CommodityLogic.  I am happy to discuss further at your convenience.

All the best,

Tom


I'm proof reading now.  I need a sanity check.  Does the GE acknowledgement
look goofy?  Maybe I should set it up in a separate letter.  I lifted the
language from the consent.

ckm

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 01/03/2001 03:31 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: CA Development I and II notice of exercise of purchase option

how's that pooch doin'?


[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

     [IMAGE]LOVE MA-SHEEN!  [IMAGE]Charlie flips for curvy 'Spin City' co-star    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] CHARLIE SHEEN   "Spin City" star Charlie Sheen is dizzy over a beauty who captured his heart right on the set of his show.   Sheen has taken a shine to gorgeous actress Denise Richards, his co-star for five episodes of the ABC comedy this season.   "Charlie is crazy about Denise," an insider told The ENQUIRER. "He's really fallen hard for her.   "His dad Martin, the star of 'The West Wing,' even came to the 'Spin City' set to meet Denise. Martin is thrilled his son is so happy.   "This is Charlie's first serious relationship in years."    [IMAGE] DENISE RICHARDS  Charlie, 36, and 30-year-old Denise - a former "James Bond" stunner - first met in June 2000 when they worked together on the movie "Good Advice."   "Charlie liked her back then but she had a boyfriend so nothing happened," said the insider. "Then Charlie recommended her for a guest spot on 'Spin City' this season - and she was so good that one episode turned into five."   Once they were face-to-face again, Sheen was quickly smitten.   "Charlie says she is so beautiful that when he acted in scenes with her he had to stare at her forehead because her beauty destroyed his concentration!" revealed the insider.   "When they first started dating about two months ago they kept it hidden from everyone on the set.    "They didn't want people they worked with talking about it.   "While they have gone out to restaurants and shops together, they prefer to stay home. They watch movies and baseball and spend a lot of quiet evenings alone.   "People close to both of them think they're going to be together for a long, long time."  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]PREGNANT LIZ HURLEY IN TEARS AS DAD-TO-BE SKIPS TOWN    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] LIZ HURLEY  Pregnant Liz Hurley jetted from London to Los Angeles for a showdown with ex-boyfriend Steve Bing over their baby's future - only to be cruelly snubbed by the reluctant dad-to-be.   So the three-months-pregnant damsel in distress turned for help to her old Sir Galahad - Hugh Grant!   Tearful Liz phoned Hugh in England - and he hopped a Concorde to be by her side as the party-hearty playboy she's dubbed Bing Laden skipped town.   Liz, 36, and Hugh, 41, huddled at an L.A. restaurant together to discuss tactics.   Now Hugh's vowed to back the beauty all the way in her battle to get Bing to face up to his responsibilities as a father.   Gallant Grant is even demanding a man-to-man meeting with the skirt-chasing movie producer, say sources.   "This plot's getting crazier than any movie Hugh or Liz has been in," declared a showbiz insider who knows the couple.    "Bing knew Liz was heading for L.A. to see him, but he picked that time to leave town with his buddy Mick Jagger so they could party in Las Vegas for a couple of days.   "Liz was distraught, and she turned to the only man she trusts now - Hugh."   Last week The ENQUIRER revealed exclusively how ex-beau Hugh was trying to woo back Liz after Bing - heir to a $600 million real estate fortune - told her he didn't want to be a dad.   "Hugh dropped everything to fly to her in L.A.," disclosed an insider. "That's how much she means to him.    "He hopes by being there for Liz she won't be able to imagine a future without him."  [IMAGE]       	[IMAGE]	 LOSE 10 POUNDS BY DEC. 25th!  Get your FREE diet profile and newsletter, and start loosing weight today! With eDiets.com, you can Lose 10 Pounds By Dec. 25th - our professional staff will help you every step of the way! Click Here!  DRASTICALLY REDUCE YOUR DEBT!  Reduce your monthly payments by up to 50%, become debt free faster than if just making minimum payments, and stop the harassing creditor phone calls! Click here now and reduce your bills today! Click Here!  Get 12 CDs for the price of 1- Nothing more to buy EVER!  Simply buy one CD and you get 11 CDs FREE with nothing more to buy ever.  You'll pay just shipping and handling.  No tricks.   No gimmicks.  It's 100% RISK FREE! Click Here!  GET A NEW CREDIT CARD EVEN W/ BAD CREDIT HISTORY!  With Centennial Card, getting the credit you deserve is as easy as 1, 2, 3! Just answer a few questions so we can see if you qualify for an unsecured or secured VISA
 or MASTERCARD
. Complete a few simple steps and we will start processing your application right away!   Click Here!  REDUCE YOUR AUTO INSURANCE - COMPARE & SAVE!  Quickly compare rates from the most reputable companies in the country. See real quotes tailored especially for you - not estimates.Raise your collision deductible from $200 to $500 and reduce your yearly premium costs by up to 30%.  Click Here!     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] CELEBRITY  FACE-OFF [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]       Dressing your family up in color-coordinated clothes, like Leeza Gibbons did is?   [IMAGE] ? TV Guide Online    Silly         Cute             Dumb        See  Results     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]

If you would like to unsubscribe from Gossip Flash, please click here.

You received  this email because you opted to receive the Gossip Flash Newsletter  through one of our valued partners. If you believe you  received this message in error or would no longer like to receive  this email simply click here . If you have any questions  please email   help@gossipflash.com  and a customer service representative will assist you


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude43.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas43.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG43.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG43.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL43.pdf


They mitigated the shit out of prices (our Pepperhill project was dispatched at $300/Mwh the whole day).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Norteast markets

My be speaking too soon, but Nepool is hanging in there today (24,731).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: Norteast markets

I hear you on the liquidity Rogers.   With Rob making those markets effective next Monday (he is on vacation), we will find out if term liquidity is possible.

Please trust me on this issue.   You will see a significant difference within weeks, not months.   At a minimum, you will at least have price discovery through 2003 on calenders (they may be $3 wide in New York, but that is better than no market).

Keep pushing on this issue.   With the volatility in the NE over the past two weeks, I'm sure you understand our reluctance on term markets in these illiquid areas.

As far as 02 or 03 quotes for E PJM and/or NY, I have heard no markets today and neither has Dana.   The pool is blowing up as we speak.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Norteast markets

Kevin-

Can you keep your ears open for anything summer 02 in J or PJM E.

If I could do one thing I would buy a piece of those.  However, it is hard not seeing anything on EOL.  Kevin, I think we have to seriously reconsider our ability to support EES Northeast business if these markets are not liquid enough.

Thanks,
RH


You found me. My slides are attached in lotus freelance

David Moskovitz
Director
RAP (www.rapmaine.org)
207 582 1135
1176 (fax)
Davidmosk@aol.com

 - dr-icc.PRZ


Yair:  Are we finished?  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	04/13/2001 08:42 AM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

I hope to leave by 3:30 Eastern Time.  Thanks for getting back to me so
quickly.  Though, I'm surprised u guys are open for business today.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 9:41 AM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

I've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and will let you know as
soon as I hear from her.  How long will you be in the office today?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:28 AM

Sara, Allegheny would like to be able to assign to affilaites in the same
manner that we are allowing Enron to make an ssignment so long as the Gty
goes along.  In our case, however, there is no gty, hence the stipualtion
that such assignment must be to an entity with an equal or better credit
rating.  If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at
least BBB+ or better.  Would that resolve your concerns?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

It's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.

(See attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/12/2001
                    10:16 AM

Sara, sorry i didn't get back to you yesterday, I was out sick.  I didn't
notice anything attached, did u send a subsequent e-mail?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:01 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13
Importance: High

Yair:

Attached is my redline.  Call me so that we can discuss the remaining
issues, including:

(1)  Calculation Agent.  We believe that the existing dispute mechanism is
adequate.

(2)  Procedures for Entering into Transactions.  There is no procedure for
dual confirms.  This is too confusing.

(3)  Transfer.  We cannot agree to your assignment provision as it is too
subjective.

The other changes were not substantive.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/10/2001
                    07:46 AM

Sara, any thoughts on my comments ISDA I sent out last week?

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaish, Yair (OGC)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:19 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, I have good news, I think we are very close to executing this baby.

I am attahcing comments to the ISDA.  They reflect comments by our outside
cousel which highlight the differences between this contract and the side
letter/ML ISDA.  They are not much.  I have also made some changes directly
on their draft where I either concurred with Enron or needed to make some
of my own changes.  Pls review and let me know what you think.

I will be leaving the office soon, so if we can wrap it up tomorrow that
would be great (I'm out Monday for Passover).

Yair Yaish
Director and Senior Counsel
Allegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC
212-236-7346

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:10 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

Attached is a blacklined (against the Enron North America Corp. draft of
3/15/01) Schedule and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  I
have tried to incorporate the essence of the March 19, 2001 "swap side
letter agreement."  Please call me to discuss as it would be nice to
finalize by April 6.  Thanks.

(See attached file: 098a Blackline ctr (Allegheny Energy Supply).doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Good Morning Sara,

Have you had an opportunity to review the Right to Terminate Language for the
Merrill Lynch and Bank of Montreal Interest Rate Swap Confirmations?

Please advise if it is acceptable to Enron.

Looking forward to your response.

Regards,

Jorge