Not a bad wire story - relevant for our conference call later today. Reuters
in London called me at breakfast yesterday, then Mark gave them some on the
record comments later. See quote. I had pointed them at lessons to be learnt
in relation to Spain and Netherlands, and you will see there are a couple of
mentions of those countries (though only in context of interconnection
capacity) towards the end of the piece. I think other relevant lessons would
be related to perils of allowing retail and wholesale (esp. pools for
residual capacity) markets to be divorced in regulatory terms one from the
other. Difference from California, however, is that the divorce in Spain and
Netherlands works currently to detriment of new entrants and to the benefit
of vertically integrated incumbents.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:59
AM ---------------------------

Iona Maclean
01/12/2001 08:24 AM
To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex
Parsons/EU/Enron@Enron, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Green/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis- Reuters- Enron
mention

---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 12/01/2001 07:25
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 11/01/2001 18:14:54
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 216668@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK:    ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off
California power crisis.

UK:
ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis.
By Stuart Penson

01/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Jan 11 (Reuters) - California's electricity crisis has sent jitters
through the European power industry but the continent, better supplied than
the U.S. state, will continue down the path of liberalisation, analysts said
on Thursday.

"California is definitely going to help us recognise that there are potential
problems in Europe," said Katharina Gassner, power analyst at the UK's Oxford
Economic Research Associates (OXERA).
"But we would certainly expect those problems to be ironed out as
(liberalised) markets evolve in Europe."

Acute power shortages in California have triggered a surge in wholesale
prices, causing the state's two biggest utilities - Pacific Gas & Electric and
Southern California Edison - to run up costs of $12 billion which cannot be
passed on to customers because prices are capped under state law.

The meltdown of California's flawed experiment in power deregulation has
alerted European regulators to the pitfalls of opening up energy markets to
competition.

But analysts say Europe's ample supplies of electricity mean it will make the
switch to competitive markets without the threat of utility bankruptcies and
blackouts now faced by America's richest state.

The European Union's power markets are opening up to competition under a
European Union Directive which came into force in 1999.

California's crisis, which is sending ripples through financial markets and
topping the agenda of U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, is rooted in a
shortage of power and an apparently unbalanced deregulation model, analysts
say.

Electricity consumption, fuelled by California's high-tech industrial base, is
far outstripping local supply which has not grown significantly for years.

New power projects were a rarity in the 1990s as environmental constraints,
bureaucratic delays and regulatory uncertainty put off investors.

EUROPE HAS POWER SURPLUS

By contrast, most European markets have a significant surplus of power. This
is most evident in Germany, mainland Europe's biggest market, where power
prices crashed after liberalisation in 1998.

"Anyone who assumes what is happening in California is going to happen in
Europe is really not understanding the situation," said Nigel Evans, managing
director in Europe for Energy consulting company Caminus.

"The supply/demand fundamentals in Europe are vastly different to California."

Supply is tighter in Europe's fastest growing markets, like Spain and Ireland.
But unlike in California, there is no shortage of companies prepared to build
new generation.

"I don't think there is any evidence of the system coming under real stress in
any European markets," said David Smol of UK-based consultants Ilex.

"There is lots of new investment on the block."

CALIFORNIA POWER PRICES ROCKET

The Californian price increases, mainly seen on the California Power Exchange,
have been higher than fundamentals justify, said Mark Schroeder, a vice
president of European government and regulatory affairs at U.S. energy group
Enron .

"Prices on the exchange reflect the need to recoup stranded costs rather than
true market fundamentals," he said.

The utilities cannot pass the costs on to retail customers because retail
rates, unlike liberalised wholesale prices, are frozen under state
deregulation laws.

Europe's deregulation plan contains a staggered timetable of market opening
that brings competition ultimately to all consumers, from big industrial
consumers down to private households.

But European liberalisation is not problem free. Transmission bottlenecks are
restricting supply on the borders of France, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands.

Prices in Spain and the Netherlands have been forced higher recently as a
result of constraints on interconnection, much of which is used under
long-term supply deals arranged prior to liberalisation.

"Interconnection is a problem but it's more about freeing up existing capacity
taken up by long term contracts than about building new interconnection," said
Gassner at OXERA.

The development of efficient, free markets across Europe would enable
companies to enter into swaps deals, removing the need for physical
interconnection, Gassner added.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 85

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Sorry to hear about this one.

I have some observations to make from my reading (and re-reading) of the
account:

1 It looks like the old "undue influence" problem again. It seems some
attempts were made by operations to follow up, but nothing happened.

We tell our operations staff they have an obligation to dissent but we don't
have any way to protect them if they do - there is still the fear that if
they upset a trader they can get fired or held back in their career. And that
is because twice a year, at the PRC, that can happen. This incident shows
some of these attributes.

For the operations process to be effective there has to be (and be seen to
be) little significant influence from Commercial Groups over the ranking of
the operations staff.

2 Whoever signed off the new deal lists in the DPR should be asked to confirm
the basis on which they signed it.

3 Why wait for the traders to approve payments to brokers ? Brokerage is in
the P&L and if operations are satisfied the trades are accurate and brokerage
is at the agreed rate, they should simply pay the brokerage.

4 Two weeks to check telephone tapes is unacceptable - it should be done same
day. I would not have waited for the traders to do it, but I would want to
know why it took them so long.

5 Given that these (short) trades were absent from the portfolio during a
highly volatile period of rising prices, I would wonder about motivation in
addressing the position during this time. Essentially, if it had been correct
we would have been reporting losses bigger than the ones we did.

I would pursue explanations to points 2, 4 and 5.

DP

Fernley Dyson@ECT
06/12/2000 02:41 AM
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert
Yeo/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W
Young/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: UK Gas late deal input and deal booking errors - o1.1m hit

James,

Thanks for the note. As described, this is an intolerable situation. I agree
your action points, but we need timelines and quantitative measures of
compliance/improvement - please could you provide a weekly update on this
area specifically and until we are satisfied that things are as they should
be.

On a more general note - let's ensure that the 'Global Standards' address the
lapses in timely action/follow-up identified here so that we can monitor
performance across the business.

Fernley

James New
09/06/2000 10:03
To: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Yeo/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: UK Gas late deal input and deal booking errors - o1.1m hit

On the 7th of June Gas Risk Management became aware that two'late' trades had
been entered into the gas trader's 'Blue book' which were both being booked
significantly late and had a material negative P&L impact (negative o1.1m).
The 'late' deals were done on the 3rd of February (Marcello Romano) and the
30th of March (Haakon Olafson) and were both forward starting sells for
periods in 2003-2004.

Background

1) Input errors

For some considerable time we have been concerned with the number of deal
input errors that have been occurring in the Gas area with the most
significant number coming form the UK Gas traders. Numerous errors have been
found by documentation and risk management over the accuracy and timeliness
of entering deals into the 'blue book' (the Gas traders are currently the
only traders in Europe who do not enter their own trades into the valuation
system - there is currently a big push to change this which has the support
of John Sherriff with a deadline date of 31 July).

In the past documentation and gas risk management have repeatedly highlighted
booking errors to the gas traders but the error rate has not fallen. A log of
all deal input errors has been formally maintained since the beginning of May
which highlights an error rate of 12%-15% of non EOL trades. This has been
discussed with Richard Lewis and corrective action is expected.

2) Deal booking and reconciliation process (Non EOL trades)

Deals are initially written into the 'blue book' by the gas traders when the
deal is done. This book is photocopied several times a day and the deals are
the manually input into GasDesk by documentation on the same day.

Faxed broker statements are received (usually) by documentation the next day
and these are reconciled to GasDesk with errors and amendments made by
documentation liasing with the traders as necessary. At this time brokers
were faxing one statement per trade (relevant later).

3) New Deal sign off

As part of the daily DPR process a separate new deal sheet is prepared and is
signed off by the traders to formally agree the new deals done on the day and
the implied origination P&L. For the 3rd of February Marcello signed off the
new deals sheet and for the 30th of March Jonathan Whitehead signed off.

4) Documentation convention

In the gas market the convention is that the seller sends deal documentation.
(relevant later). Documentation aim to get this out within one the day after
trade booking.

5) Brokerage invoices

Brokerage invoices are usually received monthly by settlements who then
reconcile the trades on the invoice to the valuation system to ensure the
deal is valid before passing the reconciled invoice to the traders to
authorise for payment. Any deals which cannot be found are raised with
documentation who then investigate and follow up with the traders.

Specific details of these 'late' trades

1) Summary

For both these trades no evidence can be found of receiving, or can it be
established that we did not receive, a broker statement which is a primary
control in agreeing the existence and accuracy of new OTC deals.

As Enron was the seller in both cases no documentation was received from
either counterparty which would have alerted us to the trade.

The reconciliation of the brokerage invoices was carried out by settlements
in April and was completed by the 20th with the invoices falling due for
payment on the 27th. The work practice at that time was that brokerage
invoices (including those with non reconciling trade queries) were batched
together and passed to the traders. This would have taken place on the 27th
of April. Details on exactly what was said and done in the 3 weeks between
passing these invoices to the traders for approval (although there are claims
that verbal follow up were made on a number of occasions) and when a mailed
follow up was made on the 22nd of May are hazy. What is clear is that on the
22nd of May Morgan Stanley contacted Enron to try to confirm their position
which was when it was realised that an error could well have occurred.

Over the next two weeks tapes were then checked by the traders with the deals
being booked on the 6th of June.

2) Deal specifics

EES Broker - Morgan Stanley trade on 3 Feb 2000
Trader Marcello
EES Invoice date 1 March; Invoice received before 15 March as settlements
started checking it. (Keren Perrott - settlements started on 13 March)
Discrepancies sent to documentation on 23 May (Chris Ware to Emma Thomson)
Traders contacted  on 24 May after copy of broker confirm was sent on 22 May
as requested by documentation to prove deal.
Deal entered 6 June after traders checked the tapes.

IEB Broker - NP trade on 30 Mar 2000
Trader Haakon
IEB invoice date 6 April; Invoice received before 27 April as settlements
started checking it. (Keren Perrott)
Discrepancies sent to documentation on 23 May (Chris Ware to Robert Vaughn)
Traders contacted on 24 May after copy of broker confirm was requested.
Deal entered 6 June after traders checked the tapes.

 Who was at fault and where did the control break down ?

I do not feel it is constructive to try to attach blame for what happened but
there are lessons to be learned and general observations and conclusions that
can be made and drawn.

Firstly there are major concerns over the Gas trader's accuracy and
prioritisation of booking trades. Despite numerous conversations on the
subject very little improvement has been seen. It has now got to the stage
where documentation are formally recording all errors including what the
error was and who made it. This is now being communicated to Richard Lewis
every two weeks with the aim being not only to reduce the amount of time
trade support spend correcting errors and re running DPRs but also to try to
avoid the incidence of errors such as this. The current error rate is 12% -
15% of non EOL trades. Documentation currently estimate that in 9 times out
of 10 the broker or counterparty are correct.

Secondly around a month ago we contacted brokers and asked for them to
provide us with one statement per day rather than one per deal which will
eliminate any lost statements or missed deals as it will be immediately
obvious when a statement from a broker has not arrived. Most brokers have now
changed but one or two still send one statement per trade. Reconciliation's
of these daily statements to GasDesk are evidenced.

Thirdly it has been impressed on both documentation and settlements to follow
up more vigorously (and by mail) errors and omissions on a more timely basis.
There is however a backlog or broker invoices which have have been checked by
settlements but have nto been checked or approved by the traders. This is
causing concern at the brokers who are chasing payment.

Action Points

Trading

Traders to input their own deals directly into GasDesk

Traders to improve their accuracy of deal booking

Traders to approve invoices on a more timely basis

Trade Support

Settlements to clear backlog of broker invoices

Documentation to chase brokers to send daily deal statements not individual
deal statements

All follow ups to be evidenced with mails used as appropriate

Documentation to check all trades since the beginning of the year versus the
broker records

Documentation to perform a reconciliation with all counterparties to agree
our forward position from July 2000 to September 2006 (the traded part of the
curve)


Can i get my ehronline id?  Thanks.

Mike


This request has been pending your approval for  38 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079466&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079466
Request Create Date : 12/17/01 4:09:11 PM
Requested For       : rodney.malcolm@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


Gerald,

Do you know the status of the Assumption Parish documents?  Are we ready for Enron to execute?

Rakhi
x3-7871

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"P. Keith Daigle" <pkdaigle@neosoft.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22P+2E+20Keith+20Daigle+22+20+3Cpkdaigle+40neosoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:48 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Israni, Rakhi
Subject:	Re: Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02

Gerald:  I have already completed #1. On #2, they just want some
assurance that the property has never had underground storage tanks or
other hazardous waste sources on it.  I believe a letter from LRCI
stating that to its knowledge there have been no such sources on or
under the Property would suffice.  As far as #3, my abstractor has
promised to complete this limited title search today.  I hope to hear
from him tommorrow.

PKD

Nemec, Gerald wrote:

>Keith,  Please revise the document to reflect Item 1 below.  With
>respect to Item 2, our environmental group is reviewing Enron's use of
>the property.  No such uses should be found.  What specifically are they
>looking for with respect to this item.  Finally, any word on the title
>check with respect to item #3.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>From: 	"P. Keith Daigle" <pkdaigle@neosoft.com>@ENRON
>>[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22P+2E+20Keith+20Daigle+22+20+3Cpkdaigle+40neosoft
>>+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>>Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:13 PM
>>To:	Nemec, Gerald
>>Subject:	Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02
>>
>>Gerald:
>>
>>    I have been contacted by Kim Torres of the Assumption Parish
>>Police
>>Jury.  She has some questions and concerns about the Purchase & Sale
>>Agreement, to wit:
>>
>>1).  They want to add warranty language to ? 4 as follows:
>>
>>    Seller warrants that it is the record title owner to the property
>>being sold, and warrants it has good and merchantable title, free of
>>any
>>and all liens or encumbrances, and agrees to indemnify and hold
>>harmless
>>buyer for the same.
>>
>>    Seller warrants that it is a corporation in good standing and that
>>persons executing this sale on behalf of seller has valid and binding
>>authority to do so.
>>
>>I believe this additional language is acceptable with some minor
>>revisions which I will do.
>>
>>2).  They are concerned about the warranty language which covers
>>hazardous wastes in ? 4.  They tell me that they have not done an
>>environmental inspection of the property.  They want to know if there
>>have ever been any underground tanks or other hazardous waste sources
>>on
>>the property.  They are looking for something in writing that no such
>>sources existed.
>>
>>3).  Upon checking the conveyance records, they found that on March
>>31,
>>1993, Louisiana Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. sold the property to
>>Louisiana Resources Co., Inc.  Then, on February 28, 2000, Louisiana
>>Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. again sold the property to LRCI, Inc.  I
>>have not done a title exam so I cannot explain this discrepancy.
>>
>>4).  She gave me the physical address of the property and the name of
>>the Police Jury President which I will insert in the documents.
>>
>>Please contact me to discuss our response to these concerns.
>>
>>Keith
>>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>


Yes, please leave the pc on the right in my office.

7pm.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:46 AM
To:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	Move Information

A couple of questions:

Will you need to keep an office here after Friday?

At what time can the move team begin your move on Friday evening?

Thanks!


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mike/terry/John

Date:		1/23/2001
Time:		9:00 AM - 9:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


SKILLING, JEFFREY K,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
CONNOLLY, LISA


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooke, Ian
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	the 2 mullets

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Clark, Chad; Cooke, Ian
Subject:	muppets


Okay

John Arnold
03/06/2001 12:05 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Greg's Bill

i dont know   sounds good to me

Greg Whalley
02/28/2001 05:32 PM
Sent by: Liz M Taylor
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Greg's Bill

Johnny,

What does Greg owe you for the champagne?  Is it $896.00?

Liz


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 06:16 PM
---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman on 08/29/2000 06:05 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Everest II latest version

This should be the form

Stuart
----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 06:05 PM -----

	Ed B Hearn III
	08/29/2000 05:30 PM

		 To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Everest II latest version


whew!  hey, you're dad's losing it.   whadya mean asleep?  if i'm asleep,
wake me up ferchrissake.

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	11/29/2000 07:02 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

You ain't goin to no play.  I'm goin to da play.  I get home from da play
around 11 or so probly.  You thinking you mite be awake this time???

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:    Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:51 PM
To:   Cameron Sellers
Subject:   Re:

holy shit, are we going to the play tonite?  if so, i'm in big trouble,
since i'm meeting with my mba group tonite.  holy shit.  otherwise, we'll
be there.  let's talk.


Greetings:
Wow, lots of fun out there, eh?  Don't know what it will be like without
Steve Peace around any more....

I have a very mundane question, though.  What prices for intrastate capacity
did the PUC finally come up with in the Sempra BCAP for large generators
under the new "Sempra-wide" rate doctrine?  Thanks a million.

Best,
Jeff


Ben:

Some last minute additions to the site visit attendence list I set you
yesterday:

10/13/2000 Wheatland

Also attending will be

Bob Bruner
Manager, Technical Services
DENA

10/17/2000 Gleason
10/18/2000 Linclon

Also attending will be

Pete Wyberila
Director, Technical Services
DENA

Hopefully the addition of these gentlemen will not cause any issues, but if
not please don't hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Joe Synnott


Premise: FERC should investigate the utility decisionmaking that led the
Califonia market to the point of excess gas demand, rather than rush to
impose gas price caps.

Utilities had ample opportunity to fill up storage last summer, but most
likely choose not to for price reasons.

Transwestern had at least a 100 M/D of available capacity to Califonia and to
the SoCal Needles delivery point through July 2000.

 Avg. Scheduled (compared to 1.1 Bcf/D capacity): April  780
        May  820
        Jun-Jul  980
        Aug  1050
        Oct-Dec 1080 (essentially full)

During the period April-Jul, TW was able to deliver up to the full 750 M/D at
Needles, but on many days SoCal gas instituted "windowing," lowering the
ability to take at Needles to 680-720 M/D.  SoCal's argument was that they
didn't believe that there was sufficient demand to run at the 750 M/D level
(even when TW had nominations of 750 M/D).

El Paso was also not full to Califonia until the last month.   At all times
El Paso  had available capacity at PG&E delivery points.  During the pipeline
outage El Paso was limited in their ability to fully deliver to the North
SoCal delivery point.  However, they were not full for deliveries to SoCal at
the south system delivery point.

2.    Utilities have opposed pipeline expansions to California

Sempra protested Transwestern's 140 M/D Gallup expansion, arguing that there
is no need for new capacity (CP99-522).

Sempra has also protested Questar's application to convert an oil line to new
gas pipeline service to California (S. Trails Expansion).


FYI.  Another Granite Update.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 04/18/2000 11:11
AM ---------------------------
From: Douglas Nichols/ENRON@Gateway on 04/17/2000 09:12 PM CDT
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Pamela Lesh/ENRON@Gateway
cc: JAY DUDLEY/ENRON@Gateway, Jim Barnes/ENRON@Gateway, PATRICK
HAGER/ENRON@Gateway, "SMTP:mike@tonkon.com" <mike@tonkon.com>@SMTP@Gateway,
Lanny Dusek/ENRON@Gateway, STEPHEN QUENNOZ/ENRON@Gateway
Subject: EFSC and NRC Sierra acqusition filings

Jay asked me to give you an update on these - it's as follows:
PGE has filed for NRC approval as an indirect transfer of PGE's licenses for
Trojan.  We have also filed a petition for a declaration ruling that EFSC
approval is not required.

Status:   We anticipate NRC approval by the end of May; no difficulty in
obtaining approval is expected.  NRC has not issued a federal register notice
of it's planned action yet, but we expect that by the beginning of May.   EFSC
will likely decide to grant the petition to issue a declaratory ruling at its
May 19 meeting in Pendleton, and to issue a ruling in our favor at its June
meeting.  We are monitoring both filings.  dn


APRIL 13, 2001:  We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 4/10/01 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to Legal and Credit.


Lexi,

I will be able to attend and am going to try to get to Austin in time for the
faculty lunch.  I will let you know if I can make the lunch for sure after
I've worked out my travel arrangements.

Thanks,
Susan


I think you and I may have different documents.  Maybe we should compare.

Thanks,

Kay


Vince,

Thanks for the extension.

Rakesh

-----Original Message-----
From:	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Tue 1/8/2002 5:05 PM
To:	Bharati, Rakesh
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley; Dupont, Anita
Subject:	RE: extension

Rakesh,

I can extend you leave of absence till
January 15.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:00 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: extension

Hi Vince,

Hope things are going well in Houston.  I am presently in Illinois.  It has been pretty hectic.  I will call soon to catch up.  In the mean time, may I request that my leave be extended by another week?  Thanks very much.

Rakesh


Vince
I support Raymond's email and would welcome the opportunity to have you give
a presentation (formal or informal) to the trading group on latest research
initiatives in Houston.  Please let us know your schedule so that we do not
overly burden you during your visit.  Look forward to seeing you and catching
up over a beer.
Thnx
Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 08:23 AM ---------------------------

Raymond Yeow
07/04/2000 08:21 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kirsty Hogarth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elliott
Katz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Gray/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Your visit to sydney in July

Dear Vince,

Hi !, it's only two weeks until the Aust Energy Risk (17-19 July ) seminar in
Sydney.
Is RISK organising your hotel ?

Otherwise, Kirsty can organise for you,
eg harbour vIew at the Regent or convenience to the seminar location at the
Sheraton ?

We would like to make sure that you have all the necessary "comforts" of home
when you are with us,
Elliott & David can set up a desk for you in the office/trading room with
phone etc
so you can use one of our PC to access email or plug in your laptop.
Please let Elliott or David kmow your requirements.

How long will you be with us ?
Is this your first trip to Sydney ?
There are several of us in the office who would like to take you  for a
meal(s)/ show you the sights etc and
discuss the latest Research findings with you whilst you are in Sydney eg VAR.

Hear from you soon.
Raymond
725pm 4 July


Counting on Paul.

	Susan J Mara
	11/17/2000 06:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Meeting with Da Mayor

Didn't you want to send this to Steffes?


Here is the list for you to keep:

Duke   John Thomas  (713) 260-8569
Utilicorp Mark Gurley  (816) 527-1758
El Paso  Bo Collins  (713) 420-3466
Southern Gary Morshes  (678) 579-5323
Dynegy  Matt Schatzman  (713) 509-6438

Fletch


You're receiving this email as a ConsumerInfo.com customer or subscriber. If you do not wish to receive these communications from us, please follow the unsubscribe instructions at the end of this message. Click here to view our privacy statement.
http://consumerinfo.rs88.net/servlet/cc4?pisXEYWV*itptlQLgkhgEJht*z*UA

------------------------------------------------------------

Refi:

Refinance at the best rates. Guaranteed.

Interest rates have dropped again. Now's the time to refinance with IndyMac Bank Home Lending. We not only have some of the best rates in the business, we guarantee it.

Visit us at www.indymacmortgage.com and find out.
http://consumerinfo.rs88.net/servlet/cc4?pisXEYWV*itptlQLgkhgEJht*z*VA

It pays to get your loan with IndyMac Bank Home Lending.

	$300 "close on time" service guarantee
	$300 Best Price Guarantee
	Loan decisions in minutes
	Competitive rates
	Live loan counselors online

Equal Housing Lender  Member FDIC  ? 2002 IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. , NYSE: NDE.
Registered trade/service marks are the property of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Rates and terms subject to change without notice.

Purchase:

Low mortgage rates. We guarantee it.

Don't settle for anything less than the best deal you can find on your home mortgage. Go with IndyMac Bank Home Lending. We offer some of the lowest rates in the country every day. In fact, we guarantee it.

Just visit us at www.indymacmortgage.com and see for yourself.
http://consumerinfo.rs88.net/servlet/cc4?pisXEYWV*itptlQLgkhgEJht*z*VA

It pays to get your loan with IndyMac Bank Home Lending.

	$300 "close on time" service guarantee
	$300 Best Price Guarantee
	Loan decisions in minutes
	Competitive rates
	Live loan counselors online

Equal Housing Lender  Member FDIC  ? 2002 IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. , NYSE: NDE.
Registered trade/service marks are the property of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Rates and terms subject to change without notice.

______________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by ConsumerInfo.com using Responsys Interact (TM).

If you prefer not to receive future e-mail from ConsumerInfo.com:
    http://consumerinfo.rs88.net/servlet/optout?pisWDXVUEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0

To view our permission marketing policy:
    http://www.rsvp0.net


Dear KEN LAY,

Recently Scott McNealy sent you a letter asking for your participation in an
executive customer survey regarding Sun's performance.  In the event that you
did not receive the letter via U.S. mail, the content of the letter can be
found below.

You can participate in the survey by clicking on this URL.  Thank you for
your time and consideration.

http://survey3.burke.com/tcs/begin.cgi?SurveyID=4889500&keycode=q2y6w&lang=eng

Cordially,

Paige Schehr
Burke CSA
paige.schehr@burke.com

Text from Scott McNealy's letter:

I would like to ask for your support in completing an executive customer
survey. Sun Microsystems conducts this survey with key decision-makers in our
top customer organizations. It will provide us with valuable feedback and
areas for improvement regarding our customers' expectations.

This web survey is administered by Burke Customer Satisfaction Associates, an
independent third party survey company. The survey requires approximately 10
minutes of your time to complete.

Within a few days, you will receive an e-mail from Burke with the appropriate
URL to access the survey.  Your response is very important, so if you are
unable to respond via the web, Burke will follow-up with a telephone call to
complete the survey.

Shortly after the surveys are completed, your Sun account team will review
the feedback we received from your company and discuss resulting action plans
to better meet your needs.  Thank you in advance for your time and
consideration.

Sincerely,

Scott G. McNealy
Chairman and CEO
Sun Microsystems, Inc.


Hello Mike,

	My name is Garrett Stephenson and I am a executive recruiter in the Houston area. I currently have a few opportunities available in ERCOT and WSCC trading and was wondering if you would be interested in looking at these opportunities or if you knew someone that would.   Please let me know a good phone number and time to contact you.   I am representing a great company who is offering great benefits, base, and 17% of the book back to the traders.

Thanks.

Garrett Stephenson
Kane & Associates
Phone : 713-977-3600
Mobile: 281-507-5627


<http://r1.adversend.com/?u=305&l=5&id=4199108>

Get your AmeriOne MasterCard
 here. It is 100% Guaranteed Approval. You can receive card limit up to $7500 with,

- O% interest
- No Credit Check
- No late Charges
- No Checking account required

 <http://r1.adversend.com/?u=305&l=5&id=4199108>

It's Simple and it's Easy!! APPLY HERE  <http://r1.adversend.com/?u=305&l=5&id=4199108>

This email was sent to you by, HotWebCash.com, a marketing partner for JohnsonLane.com Revenue Partners LLC.
Please direct all your concerns about this email to the address listed above.

TO UNSUBSCRIBE enter your email address below and click REMOVE

OR...   REPLY <mailto:hotwebcash@remove.adversend.com> to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This email was sent to: kevin.presto@ubswenergy.com


Please see attached file and call me with any questions.

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
04:45 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
09/11/2000 02:06 PM
To: Darren Delage/AP/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Japan Catastrophe Bonds

Darren,

Glad to hear from you !   I heard that you moved to Japan, hope everything
goes well for you.

The catastraphe option was listed in Chicago broad of trade, but the open
interest was very small.
Internally, Enron insurance group knows a few insurance companies offer such
product. The contact
person is Jim Bouillion.

If you are interested to offer such bond/insurance in Japan,  we can look
into the pricing and "hedging" (i.e. reinsurance)
issues.  I will discuss this with Vince, Stinson and Vasant.

Best Regards,

Zimin

From: Darren Delage@ENRON on 09/11/2000 11:33 AM ZE9
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Japan Catastrophe Bonds

Hello Zimin. I hope all is well with you.

 As you may have heard,I moved to Enron Japan about 2 weeks ago in order to
foster a financial trading presence here, with the intention of utlizing this
location to better optimize the management of Gary's exisitng portoflios, as
well as to identify and act on local trading or financial opportunities.

One peripheral, recurring idea has been for Enron to somehow establish a
market in catastraphe bonds and/or insurance. Earthquakes are perhaps the
greatest risk that the Japanese people fear according to various polls, a
natural response to the significant number of earthquakes that occur in the
area . Such a product  would have tremendous and widespread appeal and from a
cursary review,  it does not appear that there is a developed,liquid market
for such products.

I was wondering if you could talk to Vince briefly about his thoughts
regarding the feasibility of such a product, in terms of hedging where a
 natural offset is not found. Is this a product that research feels a hedge
can be made against with a reasonable amount of statisitcal confidence? I
realise this is vague and if you need any more information, please contact
me.

Sincerely,

Darren
81-3-5219-4635


Don,
Please advise of your interest in the following Candidate.

Thank you,

Courtnie Parker
EA
(713) 853-5315
courtnie.parker@enron.com


The attached file is an update to the previuous version that I sent this
morning.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-10-00Daily VolsPM.xls


Attached is the link that will allow you access to referenced database.
Please note, that we have recently upgraded the database to add the ISDA
definitions, branch offices approved for trading, and market disruption
provisions.  This information should be inputted for the new master swap
agreements on a going forward basis, but we still need to go back and
repopulate the data for the existing master swap agreements.

Also, FYI, the "See" drop down is our nickname for the name changes and
mergers reference.  If an item is filled in for that entity it should show
you any prior or new names for the counterparty.

If there is anyone else who would like the link, please let me know and I
will forward it to them.


Lynn will come to my office at 9 am.  Julian will try to be here too but he
has an 8am meeting and may be late.  I can call you if you like, but just let
me know which number.  SS

P.S.  Shall I just schedule a call with you and Mark?


----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 07:28 AM -----

	Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/16/2001 07:22 AM

		 To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Schaefer/HPL/Enron@Enron, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: EIX. PCG: QFs Prepare to File SCE Involuntary Bankruptcy Next
Week

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Paul Patterson <Paul_Patterson@xmr3.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Paul+20Patterson+20+3CPaul+5FPatterson+40xmr3+2Ecom+3E+40EN
RON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 7:11 AM
To: Schneider, Chip
Subject: EIX. PCG: QFs Prepare to File SCE Involuntary Bankruptcy Next Week

Credit Suisse First Boston
Paul Patterson
Good morning,
? Yesterday, Coram, a QF, said that it signed a petition to file involuntary
bankruptcy against Southern California Edison. Reportedly, the petition is
under review by five other renewable QFs.  Apparently, certain gas-fired QFs
are now forming a second petitioner group.
? We believe that it should be fairly easy for Coram to collect the two other
signatures needed to make a petition valid. Whether the petition will
actually be filed is unclear since the QFs may only be attempting to expedite
a resolution for the utilities and themselves.
? On Wednesday, a federal court allowed Caithness, another QF, to place a
lien on an Edison asset, thus giving it a secured claim effective in 90 days.
Edison is filing an appeal and an automatic stay of decision.
? The Caithness decision may prompt Edison's other unsecured creditors to
seek similar motions. As we previously indicated, we believe that QFs pose
the greatest risk of filing involuntary bankruptcy against the utilities
because of their dire financial situation.
? Although Governor Davis and the utilities purportedly continue to negotiate
a recovery plan, there is no assurance of legislative cooperation. In
addition, we expect news of the petition to cause near-term weakness in the
utilities' stocks. Therefore, we recommend that investors avoid EIX ($13.59,
Hold) and PCG ($12.92, Hold), unless they have a high tolerance for risk and
volatility.

Please call us with any questions you may have.
Regards,
Paul Patterson, 212-325-5876
Neil Stein, 212-325-4217
Wen-Wen Chen, 212-538-0223
Emily Lao Chua, 212-325-1982

If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender, please
click on the following link and confirm your request:
Mailto:K-8-62573-654519-2-151-US2-09FC2F8C@xmr3.com
You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal.

 - ppp031601.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000 06:28
AM ---------------------------

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/15/2000 05:32:31 PM
To: " - *Herzog, Hans" <hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter, Jeffrey"
<jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon, Charles"
<cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Stiles, Marianne"
<mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: " - *Whited, John" <jwhited@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
Subject: Out of Office

Everyone,

I will be out of the office tomorrow, and Friday, 3/16 & 3/17.  Please contact
Charlie Dalphon, 703-561-6469, if you need gas or have questions.  If there is
an emergency I will have my cell with me, 410-440-4118, or you can try me at
home 410-727-8941.  If you try to call me Friday, please speak loudly, as I
plan to be in a crowd watching basketball and celebrating St. Patrick's day.

Brian


Yes I am working on that with Bruce Golden to reduce that.  It should be more
like 5 to 6 months for the construction.
Ben


Kay, I will be out attending a seminar -- but, don't hold it up for me.
Thanks!  Michelle

	From:  Kay Chapman                           10/13/2000 12:52 PM

To: Tana Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Daniel Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah A Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Mission Impossible - HR Associate Groups Recommendation and next
steps

How does next Friday October 20, 2000, look for everyone ??? I have morning
and afternoon available.  I even have a 10:00 am if you just want to move the
date and not the time.

Kay

Tana Cashion @ ENRON   10/12/2000 02:28 PM

To: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Mission Impossible - HR Associate Groups Recommendation and next
steps

What is the first availbale day that David can be at the meeting?  Let's try
to schedule a time that day.  THanks - Tana

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Chapman @ ECT                           10/12/2000 02:24 PM

To: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah A Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gerry
Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Mission Impossible - HR Associate Groups Recommendation and next
steps

The Monday October 16, 2000 meeting at 10:00 am needs to be moved again.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but David Oxley is going to be traveling..

Thanks,

Kay


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Paul/HOU/Dynegy on 12/01/2000 11:25
AM ---------------------------

Joe Paul
12/01/2000 11:48 AM

To:   "Pat Gillman" <PGILLMAN@schiffhardin.com>
cc:   <Gene_L_Waas@calpx.com>, kamarlantes@calpx.com

Subject:  Dynegy comments on PX proposed Code of Conduct

Dear Pat,

Attached are the comments of Dynegy regarding the proposed  PX Code of
Conduct. You have received or will shortly receive comments from PG&E and
SCE that Dynegy supports. To the extent that some of the suggested changes
can be adapted to the current rules, (as suggested by PG&E) we would be
willing to assist you in making those changes consistent with our comments.

We continue to believe, as our comments have pointed out, that many of the
suggested changes are vague, overly broad, have no standards of
materiality, fail to distinguish between types of offenses in the
punishment and severity, prohibit the legitimate assertion of procedural
and substantive rights, levies excessive fines, provides for no de novo
review and provide no comfort at all that any information submitted on a
confidential basis will be afforded the proper protection.

I know that considerable effort has gone into the development of these
rules, but it is our position that the proposal you are making goes way
beyond any authority that the PX thinks may have been delegated to it by
FERC. As has been pointed out, the PX is not a self regulating body, but
one that is regulated by FERC.

With respect to our comments, I have used the redline method to highlight
changes and comments to the PX 11-03 draft. On your tool bar there are 3
icons that you can use to navigate through these comments.

As part of my comments regarding the confidentiality tariff (Section
19.3.3), I have referenced a non-disclosure agreement. This is in an
attached file called "protective order". Unfortunately, I could not make
any changes (since it is in a PDF format) but as you read through it, you
can see that it is easily adaptable to a non-disclosure agreement and
covers all the points that I referred to at the last meeting.

Finally, please understand that my failure to comment on any section does
not indicate approval. The areas I pointed out, in addition to those
covered in the PG&E memo, are the major points of departure.

(See attached file: Dynegy Comments 2nd draft code of conduct.DOC)(See
attached file: protective order.pdf)

 - Dynegy Comments 2nd draft code of conduct.DOC
 - protective order.pdf


Message points are fine.  Here's a point or two more:

It doesn't make sense to return resource construction and procurement to
utilities.
Resources owned by the utility stay in the utility's rate base (and,
accordingly, in rates) well beyond the time in which market prices drop and
cheaper alternatives exist.
The empircal evidence is unequivocal.  Stranded costs were paid for by
California consumers because the resources utilities had in their rate base
were above market prices.   SDG&E consumers paid ____ dollars; PG&E ____
dollars to date, etc.
If merchant plants are built, the merchant plant's owners take the risk  of
dropping market prices, not the utility's ratepayers.

Mid-west also experienced price spikes.  However,
Market responded with resource construction.
Prices dropped through the floor.
Note:  Tim Heizenreider provided tons of articles to me on this point.  We've
not used it very much and I don't know why.  You may want to check with Jim
Steffes.  Also note that the spikes were much more pronounced than we're
seeing in California--possibly due to the reliance on spot markets.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/31/2000 11:28 AM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: DRAFT Talking Points for Cal Energy Markets Talk

Attached for your review are draft talking points for the Cal Energy Markets
conference I'm speaking at on Thursday in SF.  All comments, suggestions,
etc. are appreciated.  Thanks.


Kevin,

I would greatly appreciate if you could help me in this case. Yaron's father
helped me
a lot to open many doors at Berkeley.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
05:39 PM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/24/2000 05:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kristin
Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Yaron's Resume

Vince,
Kevin Hannon is the executive lead for Cornell and he needs to approve.   I
am not sure if they have already interviewed on campus.  He should go through
the on-campus screening process before attending a Super Saturday.  We are
reserving the Super Saturday weekend for individuals that are highly likely
to receive an offer.  I will forward this to Kevin and Kristin Gandy.
Although they are responsible for Graduate recruiting at Cornell, perhaps it
is possible for him to interview when they go on campus.
Charlene

Kevin and Kristin,
Please see Vince's message below. Would it be possible for an undergraduate
to interview while you are at Cornell?  Please let me know.

Thanks

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/24/2000 04:37 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Yaron's Resume

Charlene,

Please, help. This is a son of a professor at Berkeley who helps me a lot in
the recruiting process.
His son goes to Cornell. Can we invite him (the son, not the professor) to a
Super Saturday? I really want
to repay the debt to his father who is very instrumental in  my recruiting
efforts.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 04:37:25 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Yaron's Resume

?
 - Yaron-RESUME3.doc


1. 458641 is correct.

2. 458801

3. 458802

And 458718 has been changed to a PM expiry time.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/14/2000 03:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource checkout

missing deals:

buy el paso
cal 04
cob
50.25
25 mw
could be deal 458641???

buy ees
Q2
cob
52.95
50mw
off peak

selling constellation
Q2
cob
53.00
50 mw
off peak

also deal 458634, expiry time is wrong, should be pm


The attached memo is being forwarded to you at the instruction of Jeff Hodge.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


Due to overwhelming demand, it looks like we will be filing Appendix A with
the settlement.? A final version will be circulated soon.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC
Sent:?? Monday, April 03, 2000 9:21 AM
To:???? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'agenergy@aeca.com';
'agoldberg@lgl.twc.com'; 'Alexander, Michael@sce'; 'Amirault, Paul@AEC';
'aod@newsdata.com'; 'athomas@newenergy.com'; 'awattslaw@earthlink.net';
'awodtke@aandellp.com'; 'Baldwin, Mark@IGS'; 'bbrunel@SMUD.org'; 'Beck,
Steve@PG&E'; 'Bellenger, Geoffrey@PGE'; 'Black, Larry@SWG'; 'Blue,
Greg@Dynegy'; 'bmcc@mccarthylaw.com'; 'Bosley, Kirby@Reliant';
'bradylaw@pacbell.net'; 'Bretz, Cathy@PG&E'; 'Brown, Keith@SWG'; 'Brown,
Sam@SW'; 'Brown, William@SWG'; 'Burkholder, John@cts/whb'; 'Bushman,
Tom@CellNet'; 'cbaker@ns.net'; 'Cervin, Peter@BR';
'cgoodman@bellatlantic.net'; 'Chancellor, Craig@Calpine';
'charles_doering@rmiinc.com'; 'Chau, Andrew@sShell Energy'; 'Checketts,
Bob@KR'; 'Cluff, Drew@Duke'; 'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com'; 'Collette,
Martin@Econone'; 'Comnes, Alan G.@MRW'; 'Connell, Bruce@Conoco'; 'Cotroneo,
Eileen@PGE'; 'Counihan, Rick@Green Mountain'; 'Cushnie, Colin@SCE';
'Dahlberg, Lynn@KR'; 'Dasovich, Jeff@Enron'; 'Davis, John@KR'; 'Day,
Michael@GMSSR'; 'Dickinson, Sandy@PGE'; 'difellman@earthlink.net'; 'Douglass,
Dan@SES'; 'dsloan@pge-nw.com'; 'ecrem@ix.netcom.com'; 'ehahn@spurr.org';
'Eisenman, Eric@PGE'; 'eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us'; 'Elsesser, Evelyn@IP';
'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'eric@gcnet.org'; 'ewo@jmbm.com'; 'Fawcett, Jeff@Enron';
'fergusonM@epenergy.com'; 'fogelmanm@steefel.com'; 'Folsom, Bruce@Avista';
'Foss, Rob@Coral Energy'; 'frazier@bull.som.yale.edu'; 'Frost, Pete@Conoco';
'Fullerton, Mark@WHP'; 'Gaillard, Bruno@Enron'; 'ghinners@reliantenergy.com';
'Golden, Patrick@PGE'; 'gpickering@idahopower.com'; 'Graham, Roger@PGE';
'grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'Hall, Rich@IGS'; 'Hannah,
Jim@TXU'; 'Harris, Mike@Reed'; 'Harris, Steve@TW'; 'Hawiger, Marcel@TURN';
'Healy, Bill@EPNG'; 'Hensman, Kevan@Aera'; 'Hilen, Christopher@Reliant';
'Hoglund, Patrick@PGE'; 'Honeycutt, Bedellia@REMAC'; 'Huertas, A.@Enron';
'Huhman, Steve@SoEnergy'; 'inggm@sce.com'; 'jbennett@gmssr.com';
'jgopal@energy.state.ca.us'; 'Jimison, John'; 'jmct@gmssr.com';
'jmpa@dynegy.com'; 'john.walley@swgas.com'; 'Johnson, Kirk@PGE'; 'Johnson,
Pamela@REMAC'; 'jond@qstr.com'; 'Jordan, Richard@SWG'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com';
'jthomson@penn.com'; 'jurewijl@sce.com'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'Katz,
Stefanie@SET'; 'Kebler, Curtis@Reliant'; 'Keeler, Paul@BR';
'keith-sappenfield@hlp.com'; 'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com';
'kirk.t.morgan@wgp.twc.com'; 'Klatt, Gregory@SCGC'; 'kmills@cfbf.com';
'Kramer, Daniel@CIPA'; 'kschellin@mtpower.com'; 'Larmour, Jack@Dynegy';
'Latterel, Maria@PGE'; 'Ledene, Ben@WGS'; 'Leslie, John@Luce'; 'Lindh,
Karen@CIG/CMA'; 'Lins, Steve@Glendale'; 'Litteneker, Randall@PGE'; 'Lizak,
Greg@Itron'; 'Louttit, Craig@PGE'; 'Lu, Frank@LADWP'; 'Maan,
Raveen@Cerberus'; 'malcantar@aandellp.com'; 'Masuda, Scott@LADWP'; 'McClay,
Shelley@Coral Energy'; 'mcclintocke@epenergy.com'; 'McConn, Kathy@EPNG';
'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; 'Meadows, Ted@UDS';
'Meadows, Ted@Ultramar'; 'Miller, Jerry@PGE'; 'Miller, Preston@WGP'; 'Moench,
Mark@KR'; 'mtran@energy.state.ca.us'; 'nge@value.net'; 'O'Donnell, Mike@PGE';
'office@mccarthylaw.com'; 'O'Loughlin, Matthew@SCE'; 'Orr, Carl@PGE';
'Oshirock@pacbell.net'; 'Pate, Michael@OEM'; 'paul.macavoy@yale.edu';
'Pedersen, Norm@SCGC'; 'Pelote, Roger@Williams'; 'Pettinato, Bob@LADWP';
'phanschen@gj.com'; 'placourciere@sf.whitecase.com'; 'Pocino, Mark@RC';
'Pocta, Mark@ORA'; 'Porter, Doug@SCE'; 'Power, Patrick@LB'; 'Radtke,
Otto@CO'; 'Ramirez, Jaime@SWGas'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'Reid, Al@PanCanadian';
'rgloistein@orrick.com'; 'rhc@mrwassoc.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com';
'rmccann@cal.net'; 'rnemec@mediaone.net'; 'robertg@greenlining.org';
'Rochman, Michael@CUB'; 'Rochman, Michael@SPURR'; 'Rosmon, Lewis@Tractebel';
'Ross-Leech, Diane@PGE'; 'Roth, Rosalie@Solutions'; 'Roth, Tom@ET';
'rtask@norm.com'; 'salleyoo@dwt.com'; 'scarter@nrdc.org'; 'scohn@SMUD.org';
'Shively, R.@Energynamics'; 'Silva, Larry@Glendale'; 'simonsen@rmi.net';
'Skaff, Andy@Dynegy'; 'sneiman483@aol.com'; 'Soong, Gwen@IGS';
'sscott3@enron.com'; 'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us'; 'Stout, M.@sempra-slns';
'Sullivan, Catherine@Southernenergy'; 'Sutton, J.C.@scana'; 'Sweeney,
Richard@CVernon'; 'tbeach@vdn.com'; 'thompson@wrightlaw.com'; 'Tisdale,
Roger@Occidental'; 'toca@compuserve.com'; 'tomb@crossborderenergy,com';
'vhconsult@earthlink.net'; 'ward@phaser.com'; 'Weil, James@Aglet'; 'Wesson,
Parks@Astra'; 'whited@paceresources.com'; 'Wood, Bill@CEC'; 'Wraff@adnc.com';
'Wright, Elizabeth@LB'; 'Yap, Cathy E.'; 'Yu, Peter'; 'Zaiontz, Jean@BP';
'Zanaboni, Kathy@RES'

Cc:???? Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM; Sullivan, Glen J.; Follett, B. David - TPDBF;
Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL;
Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Brill, Thomas R.; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Purves, Ralph
A.; Nilarp, Margarita - TP3MXM; Angeles, Zenee G. - TPZGA; Watson, Steven -
TP2SAW; Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB; Reed, William; Schavrien, Lee; Lorenz, Lad
- TPLPL; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW

Subject:??????? RE: GIR Settlement

Later today, SoCalGas and the parties supporting a comprehensive capacity
settlement will file a motion with the Commission that will include the
capacity (and perhaps the retail term sheet) that was forwarded to most of
you Friday evening.? The motion will ask the Commission for some additional
time to file a detailed, written settlement document.? The term sheet that
will be filed with the motion will not include an Appendix A, SoCalGas'
proposal for primary and secondary receipt point access.?? Parties are still
formulating language on these receipt point issues and those matters will be
finalized with the final settlement document.


Amy - This is a copy of the job description you sent out to the floor when I
took the Deal Control position. I've modified it slightly to reflect some of
my own observations of the position.

There is a position available in Deal Control, reporting to Jeff Richter and
the Short Term California desk. If you're interested in applying, please
contact Amy FitzPatrick by (INSERT DATE HERE).

Following is a summary of the responsibilities associated with this position:

To facilitate the entry of West Power deals, including short term and long
term desks and the services desk, into the trading systems.
Follow-up with Deal Clearing Settlements groups in Houston to verify accuracy
of trades in the system.  This includes timely follow-up with the traders for
clarification.
Ensure that all trades are entered by a daily deadline.
Calculate and report weighted averages of daily price and volume to Dow Jones.
Prepare and distribute daily reports to ensure all books are balanced and
report discrepancies to management.
Track and report daily and monthly error discrepancies to management and
deliver reports for possible solutions to rectify errors.
Calculate weighted averages between brokered trades and trades executed
through Enron OnLine and the Intercontinental Exchange.
Report any technical mishaps to appropriate personnel in Houston and track
computer problems until demonstrated resolutions.
Test any updated versions of applications requested by programmers and report
back any adjustments needed.

The most important attributes one must possess to succeed in this position
are persistance and a positive attitude. Working knowledge of Microsoft Excel
is essential, as is a general software aptitude.

How does that sound? Let me know if you need more.

Thanks,
Kate


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042708.txt


Thank you for registering for the AOL Instant Messenger(SM) service!

Your registration for screen name ljmenron has been received.

You are now one step away from being able to:
* Communicate instantly -- it's fast, easy, fun and free!
* Create your own Buddy List(r) feature -- see when your friends and family
are online.
* Meet new friends in our chat rooms or by searching our member directory.
* Follow your stocks and news headlines, exchange files and images and much,
much more.

Please reply to this message within 48 hours to complete the registration
process.
Simply click on reply and type 'OK' as the text of your message so that we can
confirm that your e-mail address is valid. Confirming your registration is
very
important -- it ensures that using screen name ljmenron you can use all
current
and future features of the AIM(SM) service as well as the following great AOL
web products:
* AOL Calendar(SM) (aim.aol.com/redirects/aimemail/calendar.html)
* AOL Hometown(SM) (aim.aol.com/redirects/aimemail/hometown.html)
* My AOL.COM  (aim.aol.com/redirects/aimemail/myaol.html)
* AOL.COM(SM) Personal Finance Web Center
(aim.aol.com/redirects/aimemail/finance.html)

As a security precaution you will not be able to obtain or change your
password
or update your e-mail address until you confirm your registration.

Upon confirmation you will receive a welcome message with valuable links to
FAQs
and other helpful information.

Download the AOL Instant Messenger(tm) software from the AOL.COM(SM) web site
(aim.aol.com/redirects/aimemail/download.html), if you have not already done
so.

To use the AIM service when you are away from your computer,
click
here for information about our Quick
Buddy service.

Again, thank you for registering for the AOL Instant Messenger service!

You received this one-time-only e-mail because you successfully registered
for the
AIM service. If you do not wish to receive e-mail from the AIM service in the
future,
click here.


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010722.txt


Daren---Just wanted to make sure you heard about the CES changes on Midcon on
the 16th and 17th, so let me know if you didnt get Carlos' sheet.

Mark
x33396


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041122.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GUZ
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  49.25 / Final:  49.24)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


All,

 At our offsite in Miami next week, each of you are on the agenda to present
your business and goals.  This will be very short, only 20 minutes (an agenda
will soon follow but we will have a business meeting from 8am - 11:30am on
Saturday).  Please prepare a few of pages on power point and submit to Cathy
Phillips so that she can have all the presentations ready for that Saturday
morning.

Attached below is a copy of the abbreviated goals that I submitted to
Frevert, summarizing EGM's 2001 goals.  Please do not hesitate to change the
list and add to it, it is only a guide and was used as a quick reference of
EGM for the Enron board.  After this meeting, I will take each of your
presentations and make a more comprehensive goals and objectives list for EGM
as a business unit.  Also please add some of your other specific goals that
illustrate where you want to be by year end regarding your competitive
position and/or market share.  For example, to be the largest marketer of
coal in the US, to be the largest options player in crude and products, or
what ever is appropriate.

Also attached, for your information, is a recent  presentation from the coal
group.  We thought that this was an excellent format and review.  In the
upcoming weeks, we would like to see an update on each of your businesses as
well.  I will let you know more in the next few weeks about the timing and
format.

Thanks,
Mike


Frank:

BEWARE!  This ISDA was almost finalized but for disagreement about assignment
and arbitration (so there's not much in the Annex A to dispute).  Check Lotus
Notes first and add to this file.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 11:54 AM -----

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	03/15/2001 08:43 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYSEG

Hi Sara, Maria Gelnett from New York State Electric & Gas called me.  She
would like to talk to an attorney about annex A that is attached to the
financial confirmation letters that we send them.  I have attached the
confirmation letter that she is reviewing.

Maria's phone number is (607) 762-7688.

Thanks,
Melissa


please check fees on the following trades,  thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
08:43 AM ---------------------------
Stephanie Piwetz   02/02/2001 05:32 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: bro fees with Bloomberg

Kate, please verify with traders
tom
deal 512827.01
enron sells merrill
260.00   Q2    2001
25 mws

bloomberg has fee .005   we have zero

bob badeer
deal 512927.01
Enron sells merrill
Q2 2001
250.00

bloomberg has .005 fee, we have zero

if fee
please add

thanks


Kyle,

My question on #8 had more to do with the wording of the minutes of the MIMO
meeting on Oct. 25.  I knew that Entergy's tariff allowed same day move ins.
The point of the question was that the way the minutes were worded, it
appeared impossible to handle.  Some SET members on the call last week
thought it might have been a typo in the minutes.   They said "According the
minutes of the move in/move out meeting on Oct. 25, under "Rejection of MIMO
for a Date in the Past", there was a 'strong
recommendation' that CR's not send move in dates less than current date +1
day."   Several people commented they thought it should have said "current
date -1 day."   That would allow you to request a same day move in.

This was supposed to be discussed in Austin today or tomorrow.

Thanks,

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick, Kyle [mailto:KPatrick@reliant.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:53 AM
To: set@ercot.com
Subject: TX Set C C C C Minutes for January 16th

All,
Here are the TX SET Change Control Conference Call Minutes.  Please
review and inform me if I have not recorded something accurately.  The
next change control call will be Wednesday January 23, @ 10:00 a.m.
Central Standard time.  I apologize in the delay with getting these out.
There are several Change Controls and Questions that will be addressed
this week at TX SET.  TX SET will meet in Austin at the ERCOT MET CENTER
Tuesday 22nd and Wednesday 23rd please RSVP to Terri Wagoner of ERCOT
twaggoner@ercot.com.
.
Thanks,
Kyle
713-488-5685

 <<TX SET Change Control Conference 01-16-02.doc>>


-----Original Message-----
From: Legal - James Derrick Jr.
Sent: Mon 1/14/2002 4:02 PM
To: DL-GA-all_enron_worldwide2
Cc:
Subject: Retention of Documents

This is to remind all employees that, as earlier instructed, in view of the pending and threatened legal proceedings involving the company, no company records, either in electronic or paper form, should be destroyed.  In the event of an office closing, please contact Bob Williams at (713) 345-2402 to arrange for storage of any records.

Please call Bob with any questions.


Zimin,

Sorry if you get this impression. The real reason is that I treat
the lunch meetings as an opportunity to get updates on things
that are going on at more remote locations. I interact with each of the
members of your group daily and I know what's going on.

I agree with you, however, that the lunch meetings are not exclusively
for my benefit,  but also for the benefit of  the other members of
the group. I shall make sure that you have the opportunity
to communicate  your contribution to the company.

Vince

Zimin Lu
06/20/2000 02:47 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Improve Communication

Vince and Stinson,

The valuation group has accomplished a lot during last six months.  The
number of
projects we are working on is keeping increasing.   However, when comes to the
staff meeting (Thursday lunch meeting), we are often left out for updating
our projects.
This makes me feel that what we are doing is no longer interesting or worth
mentioning.

I am hoping that we can get  more exposure, despite we are still in the old
economy.

Zimin


Here are the confirms that Joe prepared.
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	03/29/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirm

Stacy,

See attached.  We do have an executed ISDA with NUI Energy Brokers, Inc.
Also, there is Draft language in the header and footer that you may want to
take out.

Thanks,
Joe


Following our meeting Friday, we propose to make the following assumptions
for resubscription of capacity rolling-off in 2001 (Steve, please let us know
if you would like to change any of these numbers):

     Assumption Current or Extension
Plan Capacity  Months  Rate  Rate &/or Volume

EOT to WOT 20,000 Feb-Dec $.15  (KN @ $.1310)
EOT to WOT 70,000 Nov-Dec $.15  (Agave @ $.14)
EOT to WOT 8,000 Apr-Dec $.15  (APS @ $.1520)

BL to TH 20,000 Dec  max  (Valero BL to TH @ max*)

EOT to EOT 10,000 Mar-Dec $.025  (Duke - Atoka @ $.02)
EOT to EOT 30,000 Apr-Dec $.035  (Continental 15,000 @ $.07)
EOT to EOT 25,000 Oct-Dec ??  (PNM @ $.11 - decide assumption by Wed)
EOT to EOT 400,000 Nov-Dec $.0075  (USGT @ $.0075)
EOT to EOT 40,000 Nov-Dec $.07  (Agave @ $.06)
EOT to EOT 20,000 Dec  $.02  (Valero TH to EOT @ max*)

IG to BL 18,000  Jan-Dec $.04  (Duke 18,000 @ $.03)
IG to BL 4,000  Feb-Dec $.04  (Vastar @ $.06)
IG to BL 15,000  Dec  $.04  (BRT @ $.05)

S. IG to BL 120,200 Jan-Dec $.02  (Red Cedar I/C:  Southern @ $.02, Red Cedar
@ $.02)
S. IG to BL 32,800 Jan-Dec $.02  (La Maquina I/C)
S. IG to BL 26,000 Feb-Dec $.02  (Red Cedar I/C:  Vastar @ $.06)

We're assuming:
 Agave will extend their contract for 1 or 2 years.  Assumed extension rates.
 PNM will extend their contract, but probably at a higher volume and lower
rate.
 Amoco will not reduce their MAXDTQ (6,500 IG to WOT, 3,500 BL to WOT).  Rates
  range from $.175 to $.205.


Good points.  Paul's traveling.  I think it would be a good idea to re-group
on the QF issues in California because the terrain has changed considerably
in CA.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	10/12/2000 08:58 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Info I Sent to Etringer

Jeff & Paul --

Let's make sure that we know how this information is being used by the
commercial people.  I'm always worried about sending out % estimates of
future regulatory outcomes because these opinions frequently become "fact".

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/11/2000 06:50 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Info I Sent to Etringer

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 06:53 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	09/15/2000 05:49 PM

		 To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Mike:
Here's the memo on PX-based pricing for QFs that we discussed.  If you have
any questions, don't hestitate to get in touch.

Best,
Jeff


Mr. Sinha -

Unfortunately, Ken Lay will not be able to attend the May 16 dinner.  He also
has a conflict on September 28, the next meeting of the ISB Governing Board.

Rosalee

"Pramath Sinha" <pramath_sinha@isbindia.org> on 04/24/2000 11:11:25 AM
To: "Kok Peng Teh" <kpteh@gic.com.sg>, "Kenneth Lay" <klay@enron.com>,
"Jurgen Schrempp" <jurgen.schrempp@daimlerchrysler.com>, "Jurgen Dormann"
<jurgen.dormann@aventis.com>, "John Mack" <mackj@ms.com>, "James Schiro"
<james.schiro@us.pwcglobal.com>, "Jacob Wallenberg"
<jacob.wallenberg@enskilda.se>, "Henry Paulson" <henry.paulson@gs.com>, "Gary
Tooker" <gary.tooker@motorola.com>, "Daniel Vasella"
<daniel.vasella@group.novartis.com>, "Bon-Moo Koo" <hylee@office.lg.co.kr>,
"C. Boonstra" <c.boonstra@philips.com>
cc: "Pramath Raj Sinha" <pramath_sinha@mckinsey.com>,
<neeraj_bharadwaj@hotmail.com>
Subject: Invitation to ISB Dinner on May 16, 2000 in New York

Dear Governing Board member,

This is just let you know that three of our Board members - Victor Menezes
(Citibank), PC Chatterjee (The Chatterjee Group), and Uday Khemka (the SUN
Group of Industries) - are co-hosting a fund-raising dinner for the ISB on
Tuesday, May 16, 2000 in New York. While I understand this is short notice,
in case you are in New York on that date and also available for dinner, we
will be delighted if you could join us. Rajat, Dean Jacobs, and a number of
other Board members and supporters will also be there.

Please block off the date on your calendar and let me know if it is
possible for you to attend. We will be sending out a formal invitation in a
few days. Also, do let us know if you have any suggestions on who we should
invite for the event.

Please also note that the next meeting of the ISB Governing Board will be
held in New York on Thursday, September 28 from about noon to 6PM.

With best regards,

Pramath Sinha


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:36:36 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Paul
Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: House Energy Subcommittee May Propose CA Emergency Options
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

This was published in Electric Power Alert's PowerPlus Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

House Energy Subcommittee May Propose CA Emergency Options

House Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX) is
predicting an emergency energy bill for California may be presented early
next week to mitigate the state's power crisis through the summer. Among the
hotly debated topics that may appear in a compromise bill were wholesale
price caps, the possibility of granting federal regulators authority to site
new power generation and transmission, mandatory demand side mitigation, and
the removal of retail price caps for ratepayers.

While the state faced a second straight day of rolling blackouts,
subcommittee members quizzed the three Federal Energy Regulatory
Commissioners March 20 about the California situation. According to Barton,
at Republican leadership meetings taking place at the same time, the
California crisis was at the top of the agenda. Barton said he plans to
discuss possible legislation with Subcommittee Ranking Member Rick Boucher
(D-VA) after another panel is heard on March 22, and ideas will be considered
over the weekend. But while he said it remains unclear whether anything will
be presented, uncertain, time was of the essence -- he insisted that
proposals would have to be introduced early next week. The remarks are
another sign that the enormity of this summer's potential crisis is sinking
in with legislators.

There seemed to be an uneasy acceptance during the hearing that California
will inevitably come up short by several thousand megawatts this summer, and
the need for unpleasant temporary mitigation measures has become urgent. Last
week, in the Senate, Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR) offered a compromise with
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in which he would accept temporary price caps as
long as the state abandoned its steadfast refusal to pass wholesale rates
onto consumers.

One of the more surprising suggestions came from Commissioner Linda Breathitt
(D), who has been the most reserved FERC member throughout the crisis. She
suggested that FERC's role in siting new transmission and generation
facilities ought to be reconsidered.

"Under the Federal Power Act, the commission has no role in the permitting
and siting of these new facilities," she said in her prepared statement. "I
am beginning to believe this may need to be changed. FERC may need to have a
greater role in the siting of new infrastructure, because shortages of
generation and transmission likely will no longer be just single state
issues. I believe these shortages could become interstate commerce issues
that must be addressed by the Federal government."

In a frank exchange with Barton, the Commissioners all seemed in varying
degrees amenable to the idea. "I think it is an intriguing idea," said
Commissioner William Massey (D). FERC Chairman Curt Hebert (R) seemed
cautiously approving of the idea, but only after noting that siting is done
by the states for very good reasons. He warned not to "hardwire it," and
acknowledged "some sort of one-stop shopping is a good idea." While Breathitt
asked for Congressional authority for siting, Barton wondered about some
measure that would give the state a time limit to do its own permitting
before stepping in. But he added that something probably needs to happen. "I
think it is the federal role to step in temporarily," he said.

Among the more contentious issues raised was temporary wholesale price caps.
Arguing that FERC needed "to call a time out from this broken western
electricity market," Commissioner Massey called for such caps calculated on a
generator-by-generator basis with a $25 per megawatt addition, a firm sunset
provision, and an exemption for new generation. He argued that without such
protection during a grueling summer, a voter backlash could emerge and
threaten the entire concept of electric competition in the region.

But the Subcommittee seemed decidedly hostile to the idea. Indeed, several
Republican members pointed out throughout the debate that FERC only has
ratemaking jurisdiction over 47 percent of the western market, which would
limit their effectiveness. Additionally, many expressed the concern that it
would effectively cut off potential power imports from Mexico and Canada.

It also appears increasingly unlikely FERC would put any such authority into
use. Hebert, as he did before a Senate committee the previous week, warned
that price caps have a dubious history, and added that they provide "no
incentive to move into the forward market."

Breathitt also hesitated, suggesting that other options should be pursued
first, and that price caps would only work if state regulators approved and
public power authorities could be brought into the scheme.

Democratic Subcommittee members grilled the Commissioners about their recent
refund orders for January and February that were calculated from proxy market
prices. Boucher wanted to know why findings of "unjust and unreasonable"
prices were limited to Stage 3 emergencies. "We deserve a more complete
answer," he said. Hebert argued that to investigate further would stray
outside their jurisdiction as set out by last year's California orders, and
that the Commission did a thorough job of examining a wide range of
transactions. In dissenting from this view, Massey expressed concern that
FERC was limiting its scope, particularly in light of evidence from the
state's own market monitors and scholars that market power abuse was likely.

Rep. Mary Bono (R-CA) applauded FERC's recent efforts. "While I believe that
wholesale price caps are not beneficial for our long-term needs," she said.
"I do believe, and further encourage, FERC to exercise its authority to call
into question wholesale rates."

Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) insisted that possible market gaming was
detrimental to everyone. "Markets are built on public confidence," he said.
"And right now the public has little reason to have confidence in the
dysfunctional market that has been permitted to develop in California." He
pressured the Commissioners to consider investigations of other companies
under section 206 of the Federal Power Act, beyond the recently announced
investigations into Williams Energy and AES. Some GOP members criticized the
Democratic fervor to paint generators as unethical profiteers.

Rep. Steve Largent (R-OK), who represents Williams' home state, raised doubts
about the validity of any such investigation. He demanded to know how exactly
FERC established just and reasonable rates. When the Commissioners failed to
present a satisfactory answer, he complained, "how can you hold someone
accountable to a standard you don't know?" and suggested the investigation
was "unconstitutional."


-----Original Message-----
From: SHIELDS, TERRY K [mailto:tshield@entergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:35 PM
To: 'bfrihart@enron.com'
Subject: FW: eBay product

-----Original Message-----
From: McIlvoy, Karen D. [mailto:Karen.D.McIlvoy@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Davis (E-mail)
Subject: FW: eBay product

http://home.houston.rr.com/surrenderownz/auction.htm


I would watch what you say...maybe you will be the next flavor of the
week for her...just kidding.  I am hoping that she is over that phase
in her life......that really disappointed me that she was doing
that....her husband is a really great guy.
--
NGFC, tcooper@ngfc.com on 17/10/2001


Is Calpine Energy Services, L.P. a name change from Calpine Power Services
Company?  If it is I need to see the name change, because I have a financial
master executed under Calpine Power Services.  Can you fax it to me at
713/636-3490.  Thanks!

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	11/10/2000 10:01 AM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities@ECT, Enron Europe Global CounterParty@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit GCP Responses 11/09/00

Attached is the list of GCP Signoffs on EOL Approvals for 11-09-00, marked in
RED

Adnan

Bradley Diebner@ECT
11/10/2000 07:54 AM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/09/00

Regards,
bd


I am not familiar with this system but it seems philosophically we should protest even though we don't currently do any business on this pipeline.
What do you guys think?

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 6:17 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Inquiry?

Tom, does your group have any dealings with Acacia Natural Gas?  It's a Texas intrastate owned by Mitchell.  They have made a filing for approval of Section 311 rates for interruptible service and they have set up their Operating Conditions so their affiliate will get higher priority over other parties who are paying the same rate (priority within the same rate will be based on whoever has the earliest transportation agreement).

Would appreciate hearing from you in the next day or so.  Comments are due on the filing by Nov. 7th, and if we want to protest, we'll have to get our facts together.

Thanks.

Becky.


Louise,

Please see below for the GTV II project weekly status update and the attached file for the updated project timelines.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Dave Nommensen, Russ Severson, Narasim Kasaru, Jay Krish.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physcial deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process & its unit testing have been completed.
o	Changes for the view aggregation has been completed.
o	Changes for the position manager are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Establishing communication between TDS client & Sitara server & its testing has been completed.
o	Other IT items are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to TDS deal valuation are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).
o	Creating GDI Calc in ERMS is in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Development of live feeds has been completed and handed over to the user for testing.

Plans for the week ending 4/6/01:
?	Continue the development of GTV-II phase 1.
?	Finalize the requirements for GTV-II, Phase 2.

Issues:
None

Regards.

Zhiyong


Can you set up a meeting?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 07:26 AM
---------------------------

Sean.Kiehne@enron.com on 03/02/2000 06:36:33 PM
To: David.Oliver@ENRON.COM, William.Kelly@ENRON.COM,
Jeffrey.C.Gossett@ENRON.COM, Eric.Bass@ENRON.COM
cc: Brenda.F.Herod@ENRON.COM, Brent.A.Price@ENRON.COM,
Sharon.Roest@enron.com, Jennifer.Stevenson@enron.com
Subject: February Earnings

We would like to meet with each regional desk to discuss February gas
earnings.  Please email or call me to set up a time.

Thank you,

Sharon Roest
5-7346


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 04:12
PM ---------------------------

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/20/2000 02:53:42 PM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Whited, John" <jwhited@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Joann.Collins@enron.com"
<Joann.Collins@enron.com>, " - *Robert.Allwein@enron.com"
<Robert.Allwein@enron.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Joan.Veselack@enron.com"
<Joan.Veselack@enron.com>
Subject: Re: COH Choice for 4/21 - PLEASE READ - WEEKEND SETUP

Just a note that the bill from TCO goes to Aristech and CES pays Aristech for
both demand and commodity. Any gas we buy from Enron should not include any
commodity costs. Thanks JPP

Joan.Veselack@enron.com on 04/20/2000 12:12:17 AM
Please respond to Joan.Veselack@enron.com

To: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Chris.Germany@enron.com, Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
Robert.Allwein@enron.com, Joann.Collins@enron.com
Subject: Re: COH Choice for 4/21 - PLEASE READ - WEEKEND SETUP

Kara, because we are close on the SST's max MDQ, we are going to use some
of Aristech's Capacity. Also, to be pro-active on the huge temperature
swings that we have been seeing on the weekends, we are going to do a 50/50
split with storage. Hopefully, this will prevent overrun charges and
overdelivery gas. Cross our fingers!!!!!!!!!  This has been approved
through Jeff Porter, the CES Choice God!!!!!

Also Joann Collins is on call this weekend. Friday is an "unofficial
holiday" for us. Joann will be in the office tomorrow morning to do Choice.

Contract Changes:

7-1: 67693     11558
     67829     5000 (aristech capacity)
Total          16558

7-5  67693     9693
     67829     3527 (aristech capacity)
Total          13220

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey, you guys having fun yet?  Did you watch the game last night?  The Yankees are awesome--Eldon's been submitted to the loony bin.

Best,
Jeff


Unfortunately there're not.  I already checked.


-
 >    Idiot #1
 >    I am a medical student currently doing a rotation in toxicology at the
 poison control center.  Today, this woman called in very upset because she
 caught her little daughter eating ants.  I quickly reassured her that the
 ants are not harmful and there would be no need to bring her daughter into
 the hospital.  She calmed down, and at the end of the conversation happened
 to mention that she gave her daughter some ant poison to eat in order to
 >    kill the ants.  I told her that she better bring her daughter into the
 Emergency room right away.
 >    Here's your sign lady.  Wear it with pride.
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 2
 >    Seems that a year ago, some Boeing employees on the airfield decided to
 steal a life raft from one of the 747s.  They were successful in getting it
 out of the plane and home.  When they took it for a float on the river, a
 >    Coast Guard helicopter coming towards them surprised them.  It turned
 out that the chopper was homing in on the emergency locator beacon which
 activated when the raft was inflated.  They are no longer employed at
 >    Boeing.
 >    Here's your sign guys.  Don't get it wet, the paint might run.
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 3
 >    A true story out of San Francisco: A man, wanting to rob a downtown
 Bank of America, walked into the branch and wrote "this iz a stikkup.  Put
 all your muny in this bag."  While standing in line, waiting to give his
 note to
 >    the teller, he began to worry that someone had seen him write the note
 and might call the police before he reached the teller window.  So he left
 the Bank of America and crossed the street to Wells Fargo. After waiting a
 few minutes in line, he handed his note to the Wells Fargo teller.  He read
 it and, surmising from his spelling errors that he wasn't the brightest
 light in the harbor, told him that she could not accept his stickup note
 because it was written on a Bank of America deposit slip and that he would
 either have to fill out a Wells Fargo deposit slip or go back to Bank of
 America.  Looking somewhat defeated, the man said "OK" and left.  He was
 arrested a few minutes later, as he was waiting in line back at Bank of
 America.
 >    Don't bother with this guy's sign.  He probably couldn't read it
 anyway.
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 4
 >    A motorist was unknowingly caught in an automated speed trap that
 measured his speed using radar and photographed his car.  He later received
 in the mail a ticket for $40 and a photo of his car.  Instead of payment, he
 sent the police department a photograph of $40.  Several days later, he
 received a letter from the police that contained another picture, this time
 of handcuffs.  He immediatly mailed in his $40.
 >    Another sign (though this guy might be onto something worth thinking
 about)!
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 5
 >    Guy walked into a little corner store with a shotgun and demanded all
 the cash from the cash drawer.  After the cashier put the cash in a bag, the
 robber saw a bottle of scotch that he wantedbehind the counter on the shelf.
 >    He told the cashier to put it in the bag as well, but he refused and
 said, "Because I don't believe you are over 21." The robber said he was, but
 the clerk still refused to give it to him because he didn't believe him.  At
 this point the robber took his driver's license out of his wallet and gave
 it to the clerk.  The clerk looked it over, and agreed that the man was in
 fact over 21 and he put the scotch in the bag.  The robber then ran from the
 store with his loot.  The cashier promptly called the police and gave the
 name and address of the robber that he got off the license.  They arrested
 the robber two hours later.
 >    (Remind me to have more signs printed up.  Give this guy his!)
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 6
 >    A pair of Michigan robbers entered a record shop nervously waving
 revolvers.  The first one shouted, "Nobody move!" When his partner moved,
 the startled first bandit shot him.
 >    (This guy doesn't need a sign, he probably figured it out himself.)
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 7
 >    Arkansas: Seems this guy wanted some beer pretty badly.  He decided
 that he'd just throw a cinder block through a liquor store window, grab some
 booze, and run.  So he lifted the cinder block and heaved it over his head
 at the window.  The cinder block bounced back and hit the would-be thief on
 the head, knocking him unconscious.  Seems the liquor store window was made
 of Plexi-Glass.  The whole event was caught on videotape.
 >    (Oh, that smarts.  Give him his sign!)
 >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >    Idiot # 8
 >    Ann Arbor: The Ann Arbor News crime column reported that a man walked
 into a Burger King in Ypsilanti, Michigan at 12:50 am flashed a gun and
 demanded cash.  The clerk turned him down because he said he couldn't open
 the cash register without a food order.  When the man ordered onion rings,
 the clerk said they weren't available for breakfast.  The man, frustrated,
 walked away. >>

>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------