Sally, I know your are very busy and I also know you are always looking for good people.  Attached is a copy of a Resume for a person I have worked for in the past.  I have forwarded it on to HR also.

Thanks,

Mark


Yup.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Bert
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:50 AM
To:	Bresnan, Neil; Whalan, Jubran; Williams III, Bill
Subject:	EES for 06/27/01


Eric,

Attached is the assignment agreement.  It has been faxed to Barry and to Mark
Hawkins at Mercado.

Stephanie


Dude, I am totally joking around with you.  You always look cute.  Well at
least when you were dating me you always looked cute.


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:45
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/06/2000 07:59:13 AM
To: " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*jcasas2@enron.com." <jcasas2@enron.com>
cc: " - *Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Perrone, Brian"
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Herzog, Hans"
<hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon, Charles"
<cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: DPL REVISED OFO

DPL has just revised its OFO for the following days:

Tuesday March 7th - previous OFO volume was 943 dth, please deliver 763 dth
instead.

Wednesday March 8th - previous OFO volume was 863 dth, please deliver 743 dth
instead.

Chris Germany will be advised of this change via a spreadsheet sent by Herndon
at 9 am est.


Here is the document that Chris is using (if you don't already have it).
---------------------- Forwarded by James Hoff/DEN/ECT on 05/17/2000 14:19
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Chris Hoekenga" <choekenga@br-inc.com>
05/15/2000 10:18

Please respond to <choekenga@br-inc.com>
To: <Mark.Whitt@enron.com>
cc: <James.Hoff@enron.com>, <Shonnie.Daniel.com@br-inc.com>, "Lee Hanse"
<lhanse@br-inc.com>
Subject: Lost Creek Issues

Attached is the list of issues we talked about at the last member's meeting.
After reviewing the LLC and Capacity Allocation agreement I believe we are
O.K on numbers 1,2 and 4.  Give me a call at your convenience and we can talk
about the rest.

 - LOSTCREEKISSUES.DOC


January 29, 2002

NESA MEMBERS:

Attached is our latest and greatest brown bag being held February 20, 2002.
Everyone that registers for this event by February 8, 2002, will be
automatically put into a drawing for Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo
tickets.  YEE-HAW!

Hope to see you there!

Lana Moore
Director of Education
NESA
(713) 856-6525

 <<Storage Economics.doc>>


The DCMA states in 6.01 that notice can be given by the designee.  Karl
thinks the notice must come from the DCM (ENA).

Does it matter? I don't mind ENA giving the notice in this case, but I wanted
to see what the team thinks.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 10:40
AM ---------------------------

KWiemer@milbank.com on 01/08/2001 10:19:10 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com,
Catherine.Clark@enron.com, john.cody@csfb.com, Roger.Ondreko@enron.com
cc: LHarris@milbank.com

Subject: RE: CA Development

To facilitate Enron's meeting the notice requirements under the Development
and Construction Management Agreement, attached are our comments to just the
draft notice of intent to purchase received on Friday. Our comments to the
Assignment and Assumption and the Bill of Sale will follow shortly.

I assume that the ABB transformer, together with a second LM 6000, will be
going to CAED II?

Regards, Karl Wiemer

 <<enxt notice.PDF>>

-----Original Message----- From:?? Kay.Mann@enron.com
[SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent:?? Friday, January 05, 2001 5:39 PM To:????
Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Catherine.Clark@enron.com;
john.cody@csfb.com; kwiemer@milbank.com; Roger.Ondreko@enron.com

Subject:??????? CA Development

(See attached file: Purchase Option Notice(CAED I)rev1.doc)(See attached
file: Assumption with GE ack(CAEDI)rev1.DOC)(See attached file: Bill of
salerev1.DOC)

Attached are drafts of the documents to effect the transfer of two GE
turbines and one ABB transformer to CAED I and CAED II.? The dates and
amounts are bracketed, as pending the determination of the closing date. We
will need sets for both CAED I and CAED II, with II receiving the
transformer.? These will be prepared with the forms are agreed.

These documents are subject to internal Enron review, but in the interest of
time I am sending the documents to everyone.

Thank you,

Kay ?<< File: Purchase Option Notice(CAED I)rev1.doc >>? << File: Assumption
with GE ack(CAEDI)rev1.DOC >>? << File: Bill of salerev1.DOC >>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s),
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message
from your computer.

 - enxt notice.PDF


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
06:22 PM ---------------------------

Mark Tawney
11/14/2000 05:33 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather Memo

The Weather Risk Management Group will transfer Catherine Woolgar from the
Oslo office to the Houston office as soon as she is able to transition out of
her responsibilities in Olso.  In Houston, Catherine will assist in trading
the US portfolio and be responsible for a number of EOL cities.  Catherine
has developed a very good understanding of trading weather risk management
products and the peculiarities of the weather market.

Ross McIntyre in the London Office will continue to provide general support
to the Oslo office while developing relationships with the commodity desks in
London and with the market generally.  Additionally, Ross will continue to
assist in the development of the trade and portfolio analytical systems to be
utilized globally by the weather desks.

In oder to significantly grow the weather risk management business, we are
committed to the vision of trading and orginating locally while managing
globally.  Tthe Weather Risk Management Group ultimately expects to have
weather trading in most Enron's offices that trade other commodities.
Accordingly, as soon as commercially feasible, Catherine will return to
London to work with Ross McIntyre to establish a trading presence in the
London office.


How about 4:00?

Sarah Wesner@ENRON
09/12/2000 06:00 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Margin Lines

John - we could be ready by Thursday.  What time does your market close (what
is the earliest in the afternoon you can meet?)


I believe the registration deadline for the Nov 7 election has passed.  I'll
ask Eliz to forward the registration materials to you so you can be ready for
the next election.  Also, if you were registered in Harris County before you
may still be on the rolls at your old precinct ... you should ask.

	A G Gelotti@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/02/2000 12:36 AM

		 To: Steve Kean@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Harris County - Early Voting Shuttle!!!!!

Steve,
My wife and I have been out of the country and have not registered to vote
nor do we have absentee ballots to vote.  Any suggestions on how we can vote?

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Harris County - Early Voting Shuttle!!!!!

Avoid the crunch on election day by voting early!

ENRON is providing employees with
complimentary shuttle service
 from the Enron Building to the downtown early voting site!!

Thursday, November 2
and
Friday, November 3
1319 Texas Avenue @ Austin Street
7:00 am until 7:00 pm
(transportation by Beal's - pick-up on the West end of Andrews Street)

In order to vote early at this site,
you must be registered in Harris County
and present your drivers license for ID verification
(your voter registration card is not necessary)

Please take advantage of this opportunity and VOTE!!

For election-related questions, please reference this website:
www.co.harris.tx.us/cclerk/elect.htm


Vince,

Would I be able to get a copy of your presentation last night at GARP?  I
have a coworker who was unable to attend.

Thanks,

Allen Bryson
Conoco Inc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn - Oncall

Date:		5/20/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Sorry for not getting back to you sooner (I was out of town last weeek) -
unfortunately, I have a 2:00 already on my calendar but am available later.
If you want to meet with Alan & Jeff first and see me afterwards, that's ok
with me.

Tara Sweitzer
08/19/99 01:22 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan B
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Online / Legal

Torrey, and myself would like to set-up a time for Monday to discuss a few
EOL issues that we feel pertinent to the Legal Department. If you could let
me know if  the afternoon ( 2:00) works for you I would greatly appreciate
it. Once I hear from you I will set-up a room for us all to meet.

Thank you for your time, TARA SWEITZER


When Bill Miller calls to sell megawatts for a minimum price,   make sure
that you follow up with an adjustment bid to ensure that fixed price.
If you are confused on whether to adjust or not,  ask him well before the
deadline to adjust bid.

We had some confusion on this issue on Friday.    If you have any questions
on this issue let me know.

JMF


I would be open to this as well.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [SMTP:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
> To:	arem@electric.com
> Cc:	douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> Subject:	Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
> of Su spension DA
>
> I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached
> proposal.  I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
> everyone.
>
> NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
> having had a chance to think more about it.  I wanted to run it by
> everyone
> to get your thoughts before submitting a redline.  If you feel this
> warrants
> a conference call I will gladly set one up for today.  Time is of the
> essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible.  If we all
> agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
> tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.
>  <<arm-puc-plan.doc>>
> Proposal Benefits
>
> 	1.	We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
> proposing.
> 	2.	Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
> 	3.	Strong argument for avoiding any contract review.    Our
> verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but
> add
> details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
> and validation
> Thank you,
> Janie Mollon
> Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
> Office:  602-629-7758
> FAX: 602-629-7772
> Mobile:  602-625-3892
>  << File: arm-puc-plan.doc >>


I'm told now we may have a deal

-----Original Message-----
From: Kean, Steven J. [<mailto:steve.kean@enron.com>]
Sent: 26 November 2001 20:00
To: Steve Lipin
Cc: Denne, Karen
Subject: RE:

I don't have any comments to add.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lipin [<mailto:slipin@BrunswickGroup.com>]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:38 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.
Subject:

This email is sent by Brunswick Group Limited, 16 Lincoln's Inn Fields,
London, WC2A 3ED (also the registered office). The company is registered
in England (No. 2094879).

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us
immediately, then delete this E-mail.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************

This email is sent by Brunswick Group Limited, 16 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3ED (also the registered office). The company is registered in England (No. 2094879).

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete this E-mail.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.


I have to keep working until you get here!!!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hogan, Dalton
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Here

Chris,

I forgot to ask if you have been migrated to Windows 2000 or are you still on Windows NT.

dalton

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Hogan, Dalton
Subject:	Here

may05clg

ID cgerman

locations 3224b


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Group

Let,s give a big round of applause to the Weather Team!  Environmental
Finance Magazine ranked the weather group #1 in Online Services and #1 Dealer
in the United States and Europe.  Gary Taylor, manager in weather trading,
comments, "The "Best Dealer" award reflects our counterparties' appreciation
for the significant effort we have made to drive the growth of our market by
making two-sided markets where other companies are only willing to quote
either a bid or an offer.  This award also reflects the innovative nature of
everyone on our desk, and their ability to price non-standard structures for
our customers.  It is truly a team award.  The "Best Online Dealer" award is
simply another testament to the unparalleled success of EnronOnline.  By
providing tight, two-way markets online, we have provided two critical
elements to generate growth in our market: 1) an element of price discovery,
and 2) a quick and easy way to transact."

The Weather Risk Management group launched a new product this week:  Power
Demand swaps.  These contracts use power demand as an index and allow power
market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers, etc...) to
mitigate volumetric exposures.  The first contract the desk offered is for
the PJM power pool.  On EnronOnline, weekly swaps are available and the desk
has placed option contracts on this index in the broker market.  Inquiries
regarding this product should be directed to Claudio Ribeiro (product
manager) x37313, Gary Taylor x31511, or Valter Stoiani x36906.

Competitive Analysis and Business Controls
eSource, Enron's premier corporate-wide research group, launched their new
intranet product, eSearch, on December 1, 2000.  eSource's team of
specialized researchers have created a web site to bring information and
research to every employee's desktop.  The eSearch web site offers many links
to information resources, access to research databases, specialized searches,
sites to purchase books, articles, and reports, and training.  Employees can
use the web site to conduct their own research or as a vehicle to submit
research requests.  eSource's researchers and industry specialists are
available to all Enron business units to provide timely and cost efficient
research, to work with individuals or groups to fulfill one time research
requests, or to design ongoing, customized monitoring projects or news
updates.

Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
EGM Fundamentals is quickly building a team of expert analysts and associates
to work directly with traders and marketers.  The team is already busy
analyzing various commodities and market situations.  For example, an
initiative is underway to analyze current negative fractionation spreads in
the market resulting from rising natural gas prices.  Web sites to host this
analytical information are currently in development for all EGM commodities.
These sites will provide research and analysis, weather, publications, and
any other information that will assist in decision-making or identification
of potential commercial opportunities.  For questions or requests regarding
fundamental research, contact Jennifer Fraser at x34759.  For questions or
suggestions regarding the web sites, contact Heather Purcell at x54057.

Austin Energy
Austin Energy and Enron Sandhill, L.L.C, a subsidiary of Enron North America
broke ground November 29, 2000 for the construction of the Sand Hill Energy
Center, a 180-megawatt peaking electrical generation facility.  Located in
eastern Travis County, the Sand Hill Energy Center will be a natural gas
fired facility that will operate primarily during peak demand periods.  The
$93.7 million project will feature four 45-megawatt General Electric gas
turbines and will be operational May 1, 2001.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBALFLASH

Coal
The London dry cargo seafreight team traded 1 million metric tonne of
Capesize vessel swaps via EOL in one day, (Wednesday 28th November). The deal
was created by combining OTC options and a physically related cash market
deal.  This helps to bring our YTD EOL to just under 2.5 mln tonne.

Off-shore wind energy deal
Enron Wind has signed a power purchase agreement with Swedish energy company
Graninge.  According to the agreement, Graninge will deliver electricity to
consumers using Enron's wind power plants in southern Sweden.  Enron Wind's
Utgrunden off-shore wind park, completed this year, will generate in the
region of 38,000 megawatt hours of electricity, or enough for around 6,000
average homes between the mainland and the island of Oland on the southeast
tip of Sweden.  In an announcement this week, Graninge stated that it plans
to market the power to consumers as 'green' energy.

Happy 1st Birthday EnronOnline!
This week saw EnronOnline celebrate its first birthday.  During the course of
its first year, EnronOnline has passed a number of milestones including the
addition of a range of new functionalities for customers on the site.
EnronOnline has now come of age, having surpassed the $274 billion mark in
notional value in November.  This represents a total of 478,695 transactions
since the site was launched on 29 November 1999.

The first anniversary was marked by giving the media guest access to
EnronOnline in Europe.  A team from Reuters was invited into Enron House to
receive a full demonstration of EnronOnline and as of today will be able to
quote in reports live prices from EnronOnline.  Other media outlets are being
invited to obtain guest access during the coming weeks as the word of
EnronOnline's success continues to spread...

Australia
Enron Australia continues to assist in the region in a supportive role.
Elliott Katz worked on the GEM migration in Singapore last week with an IT
team from London, Oslo and Singapore.  Approximately 40 users, including
Traders, were migrated to Windows 2000 and the CORP domain.  This is an
important step for the Asia Pacific region, as it brings the three biggest
offices (Singapore, Sydney and Tokyo) into line with corporate standards for
desktop computing.

Japan
E-Power, a JV between Enron and Japanese finance company Orix, has announced
proposals for a 2000MW gas-fired power plant at Mutsu-Ogawara, an industrial
area  in northern Japan.   A feasibility study will be undertaken to define
how the project will go forward and this may include the development of an
LNG terminal in the vicinity.  The nature of the permitting process is such
that the plant would not begin operations for six to seven years.  This
project is just one of several options that E-Power are working on in Japan.

NUGGETS & NOTES

&Go Big or Go Home8 ) Mike McConnell/President & CEO-EGM

"Call Back" - Don Schroeder, VP/Crude Trading-EGM

REMINDER

Holiday Party
Enron North America, Global Markets and Industrial Markets
Enron Field
Saturday, December 9
7:00 - Midnight

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Joseph Taylor, Jennifer Rosado, Rabi De, Louis Dicarlo, Scott Churbock,
Kenneth Parkhill, Nicholas Ernst, Dirk Dimitry, Stephanie Taylor, Dimitri
Tagaropulos, Georgia Blanchard, Jona Kimbrough, Jeffrey Baldwin, Patricia
English, Jaesoo Lew, Cheryl Nelson, Gina Abbott, Ryan Keith, Brian Dawson
EGM )Ellen Alexander, Mike Perun

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Gregory Golden
EGM ) Keynan Dutton

FROM THE EDITORS

Thank you to all the contributors to this week's EnTouch.  We want to hear
from the various departments within Enron Americas, Global Markets and
Industrial Markets!  Please continue to send your business highlights,
nuggets & notes or suggestions to Michelle Vitrella or Kathie Grabstald.

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


I really love you.  I can't wait to be with you this weekend.  I bet you are glad you listened to me and did not buy any Enron stock at $21, considering it is at $18 today!!!

Love you,

Tracy


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 08/14/2000 10:47:18 AM
To: Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

DJS400@cs.com on 08/14/2000 09:35:46 AM
To: VIEWPOINTS@chron.com
cc: PAUL_BETTENCOURT@co.harris.tx.us, JUDGE_ECKELS@co.harris.tx.us,
HCRPGOP@AOL.COM, KENNETH.LAY@enron.com, STEVE_LETBETTER@reliantenergy.com
Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

 - ARENA.doc


Holly Lions
914-641-2674


Steve,
Joe Hillings asked me to forward the following names to you for the WTO
Working Group:

Members I plan to select: Jose Bestard, David Merrill, Rob Bradley, Peter
Styles, Scott Bolton, Carolyn Green, Terry Thorn, Hap Boyd, Mac McClellan,
John Ambler, Aleck Dadson and Chris Long.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/14/99
09:47 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/09/99 11:21 AM
To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Global Affairs-WTO Working Group

Peter and I agreed it should be him.   thanks   mcs

good to see you in Napa, too.   mcs

Joe Hillings@ENRON
09/12/99 16:09
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen
McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Enron Global Affairs-WTO Working Group

Mark: It was good to see you in Napa at Steve's excellent meeting. I am ready
to submit my list of WTO Working Group members but would like to select
either you or Peter Styles to participate. Can you kindly advise which of you
should be designated?

Members I plan to select: Jose Bestard, David Merrill, Rob Bradley, Peter
Styles, Scott Bolton, Carolyn Green, Terry Thorn, Hap Boyd, Mac McClellan,
John Ambler, Aleck Dadson and Chris Long.

Please advise.

Joe


EPPI Claim for 2000-2001

Enron Processing Properties, Inc (EPPI)  assignment of the GPM Agency Agreement committed EPPI to reimburse KN (now Oneok) for all-in transportation rates above 4.45%.  NNG's must bill minimum rates and those rates are sometimes above the 4.45% all-in rate, therefore Oneok has submitted invoices for transport excesses of $79,165 and $222,315 for the years 2000 and 2001.

The invoices are currently being checked by Gas Logistics and once a final determination has been made coding instructions will be needed for this EPPI commitment.

Prior Claim (1997-1999)

On 2/18/2000, KN submitted a claim for $363,211 covering 1997-1999, I checked the calculations and the claim was revised to $192,000.

During negotiations KN sold the agreements to Oneok and to my knowledge the prior claim was never paid nor were any more demands for payments made.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------

	Dortha Gray
	12/13/2000 02:18 PM

To: Gregory Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Barrett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Leo Paige/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cedric Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Musngi/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Dave Gunther/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Greek
Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry West/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Wilcott/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Faith
Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, kirk_stevens@pgn.com, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade
Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Agatha B
Tran/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron@Enron,
Peter Berger/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Scardino/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Herbold/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric McKee/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael K
Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Montgomery/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas
Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT,
Krysti Knight/HOU/ECT, Dave Andrews/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Elise Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda LaBaume/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:

Subject: 2000 Annual Report/Form 10K Schedule

Find attached (i) a schedule detailing draft distribution dates and (ii) the
responsibility matrix for the 2000 Enron Annual Report.  The responsibility
matrix lists the responsible business unit contact, a corporate contact as
well as due dates.

Gary


A likely story.

By the way, what do you think of having Rob or someone OBS the Coyote Springs
contract so we can use it as a starting point?  That would give me something
to report.

Thanks,

Kay

Roseann Engeldorf
07/18/2000 02:16 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: GE/Enron Conference Call

Kay, I am in Scott's Wednesday meeting.  I know, it is not St. Thomas, but it
is a command performance.

R.


This deal was a sleeve done for EES, and we've had problems with the trade
dates on these before. EES reported this trade to us on 12/6/00, and it was
Matt Motley's understanding that the trade was executed the previous day. He
doesn't care either way, but he suggested you talk to someone at EES - maybe
Jubran Whalan or Neil Bresnan - about what their intent was with the date.

In the meantime, I can change the date to 12/4 if you'd like. What would be
best? E-mail or call and let me know.

Thanks a lot!
Kate @ 503-464-7486

Stephanie Piwetz   12/19/2000 08:15 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 474440.01

Kate-
Please verify trade date for trade 474440.01, we received our executed Enron
Confirmation Letter back from Powerex Corp and they struck thru our trade
date of 12/4/00 and placed 12/5/00.  Matt Motley was trader, Jan 2001,
$375.00,
Cob N/S.  Please check and I will make note and send to Powerex.   Thank you.


Phil,
I agree with your assessment, but would offer some additional information.;
After returning from Austin on Wednesday and learning that Larry Campbell
had;received a negative reaction from EPA Region IX concerning a possible
meeting with them, I worked on this issue most of Thursday and Friday.; The
strategy I discussed with Lou was to locate a local Arizona or California
"political/lawyer" type;who would have the necessary contacts to get us in
there and get the permits moving.; Lou agreed and we have been working on
that strategy while gathering more information related to the "right" contact
that could get this job done.; I personally have had lengthy discussions
(Thursday and Friday) with Lou, Larry Campbell, Bill Kendrick and several key
consultants that have extensive contacts within both Arizona and
California.;We are closing in on a;local law firm and also a "high level;air
consultant";who will be able to get us in at the Director or Air Permit Chief
level;to present (1) our;situation, (2) clean air needs for Arizona and CA,
and (3) how long these permits have already been on file.; We should have
someone identified early this next week.;
;
Let me present the following information to;complement yours:
* ;The permitting timeline;being used;was based on historical
timelines;encountered;while processing prior Arizona projects.; No indication
of backlogs or slower processing in the beginning.; A familiar consultant
(Argent);was used for the air permit applications and no indication was
offered by the AZ DEQ or EPA Region IX that normal processing was not
occurring.; Applications filed in March, 2001 and by letter from the agencies
were deemed complete by mid-April.
* Within the last two weeks, the Arizona DEQ Permit Engineer assigned to the
applications for Station 1 and 2 has stated that he is overloaded and working
on the applications as they are in the "que".; He told Larry Campbell (and I
have verified;it also by talking to outside consultants that permit in
Arizona) that this is true and the AZ DEQ have been very slow lately in
getting permits out. (Caveat: One of the suggestions we want to carry in to
AZ DEQ is that we would be willing to pay for a third-party contractor to
take the permits and work them up;for release to the publishing firm so they
can be sent out for public comment.; AZ DEQ is willing to meet with us and
discuss our applications.);; Even if we get this part going, this is only
part of the problem.; Bottom line is;we must play our cards;correctly at this
juncture to be able to get our applications moved up in the que, typed, and
out for public comment; but EPA Region IX will still have thirty days after
that for their review of those two state issued permits.
* EPA Region IX is a different story.; It is most difficult to put pressure
on them, more so than AZ DEQ.; The applications for Stations 3 and 4 are on
tribal land and these;applications are not delegated to any state air quality
department.;;After the technical meetings in the office last week, Larry made
a couple of calls;to the Permit Engineer;in Region IX and received a negative
response.; Larry was told that the;permits would issue in one to four months
and that;there was no need for a meeting with them.; Again,;my advice at this
point is to find the right person with the right contacts at a very high
level and get the meeting set.; It's one thing to pressure the State of
Arizona and get a permit applications moving; but if we are not very careful
with Region IX we could damage our ability to not only get Sun Devil's
permits, but create audits and compliance situations that are far reaching.;
Again, we must first get a personal meeting with them;to enable us to
present;the need, circumstances, and how long these permits have already been
on file.; Locating the;correct person to help us do that is of upmost
importance!
* Clarifying the complicated point, EPA Region IX has responsibility
to;review and publish not only the permits for Stations 3 and 4, but to also
review the AZ DEQ permits for stations 1 and;2 for 30 days.; Therefore, if we
anger EPA Region IX over permits for Stations;3 and 4, they could delay the
issuance of the permits for Stations 1 and 2 that;have been expedited with
the AZ DEQ.; It's a two-edged sword.
Our Strategy:
* Continue to work on the technical staff permit engineers, but very
carefully.; Indications are that our phone calls are beginning to annoy them.
* Locate a political/lawyer type that has connections at the top of AZ DEQ
and EPA Region IX to help us get the;desired meeting with key;people in order
to;move;the permits.; This should be done within the next week.
* Offer to assist in any manner (e.g., funding a third party) to get the
permit applications moving out of AZ DEQ and EPA Region IX for public comment.
I have some strategic ideas that will increase the;probability that this type
of circumstance will not occur in the future.; I will be glad to discuss any
of this with you on Monday morning.; John Shafer
;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lowry, Phil
Sent: Sun 9/16/2001 8:56 AM
To: Martin, Jerry D.
Cc: Shafer, John
Subject: Red Rock Air Permits Heads up!

At Stan,s staff meeting last week, the discovery of a delay in the issuance
of Air Permits was discussed.; Stan indicated that this was unacceptable.; I
requested that you conduct a meeting that afternoon with key people to
outline a plan of attack to get the permit schedule back on track.; I am
aware that you did such and you provided a voice mail update that indicated a
plan.
;
Here is the problem.; Apparently the matter was further discussed at the
weekly Red Rock status meeting on Friday and the following feedback was
provided by a &little birdie8.; We can expect another unpleasant discussion
at Monday,s 8am meeting with Stan.
;
* Joe Hartsoe has been unable to pursue any discussion with Washington
officials to put pressure on Arizona.; WTC attacks!
* Operations is unwilling to put much pressure on Arizona/EPA out of concern
for future responsiveness from the agency Re: Sun Devil
* Sun Devil is a bird in the bush and Red Rock is a bird in the hand.
* There is no way that we can get the Red Rock project completed as promised
because we waited until it was too late to find out what was going on with
the Air Permits.
* The agency will not allow a bifurcation of the project and let us proceed
with on site construction prior to a permit and delay delivery of the
compressor to the site.
* We haven,t yet had any contact with the agency after the discussion last
Monday.
;
;
;
;

;
;


Thanks for your note.  I will miss your sense of humor - you always put a smile on my face!   Hang in there with the California situation, and hope to see you soon.

Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:23 AM
To:	Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Wishing you well

Well, it was too brief, and I didn't get to work with you nearly as much as I'd hoped. But when I did, it was very enjoyable.  All the best.  These are strange and unsettling days, but it seems that the best among us always land on their feet, so I'm sure that's where you'll end up.  Take care and hope to cross paths again soon.

Best,
Jeff


I found out the problem was that I was not on the system.  I am now listed
but am having trouble with certain of the functions.  I will work with HR
here to get this done.  I selected the same list of reviewers online that I
emailed you earlier.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/06/2000 02:20 PM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry
07/06/2000 07:03 PM
To: Mark Taylor@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reviews

ESA is in the middle of doing mid year reviews.  They have an automated
system which I do not think I have access to because I work for ENA.  HR here
is checking on how I can do the reviews for Andrea, Cecilia and Pia.

With respect to ENA, if you are doing midyear reviews I would suggest the
following reviewers, yourself, Lynn Aven, Andrea Calo, Maria Pia Beccaccini,
and Mike Guerriero.

Let me know if I need to do anything else.

Thanks,
Brent


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	09/25/2000 04:05 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 09/25/00

The EOL approvals for 09/25/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Here's the revised version of the passages for your records.  I just spoke to Goeffrey Colvin and he is now ok with all the changes.

Thanks

Kal


?
EarningsWhispers.com is Barron's Favorite Source for  Earnings Information

Fundamentals Always Prevail: These 14 Stocks Will  Prove It
Since 1994, Alvin Toral averaged a whopping +79.3% yearly. His  secret?
"Fundamentals always prevail": booming revenues and earnings, reasonable
P/Es, strong cash flow. He just said "buy" to 14 fundamentally-solid stocks.
Get  this FREE Report:
http://www.investools.com/c/go/PFUN/WHISP-pfunTB1?s=S601

Despite an onslaught of earnings warnings from tech  companies lately, the
consensus expectation for Oracle (ORCL) is for  at least a penny earnings
surprise and possibly a two-cent positive  surprise.

Bert Hochfeld at Josephthal & Co., one of the more accurate  analysts
following Oracle, is one of two analysts that have an official earnings
estimate of $0.11 per share. Mr. Hochfeld told clients recently that the
company  would meet his expectations with strong U.S. sales offset by
disappointing  European sales.?

The consensus among the 28 analysts is for Oracle  to earn $0.10 per share on
revenue of just under $2.7 billion, yet even the more  conservative analysts
are optimistic. Gretchen Teagarden at Salomon Smith Barney  is one of the few
analysts with an estimate below $0.10 per share, but her  revenue estimate is
slightly above the consensus revenue estimate.

On  Tuesday Chris Shilakes at Merrill Lynch told clients that he is
projecting  earnings of $0.10 per share on revenue of $2.68 billion. However,
he added that  revenue might be slightly better than his projections and
Oracle's continued  improvement with operating margins should lead to
earnings of $0.11 to $0.12 per  share.?

Last week Jim Pickrel at Chase H & Q told clients that  he expects the
company to meet or beat his earnings estimate of $0.10 per share  and revenue
estimate of $2.6 billion. He stated that Oracle's "pipeline appears  robust"
and that the company should achieve 52% revenue growth or better in its
applications business.

The pressing issues regarding Oracle among the  analysts are next quarter and
the recent management turnover. Mr. Pickrel stated  Oracle's Senior Vice
President Gary Bloom's departure would not have much of an  impact, but
turnover in other key management positions is an issue. Yet, the  recent pact
with CitiGroup (C) adds some  confidence in the current team. Richard Davis
at Needham & Co. told clients  recently that this quarter would be fine but
still downgraded Oracle's stock  because of the departure of Bloom and Senior
Vice President Ray Lane reduces the  company's earnings visibility and may
encourage others to leave the company as  well.

Mr. Upin said that Oracle could have a tough February quarter and  could see
its toughest test of its performance in the applications space in the  May
quarter. Yet, overall the analysts like the stock and believe the recent
stock price is a buying opportunity.?

As result, the company will  need to at least meet or beat the $0.11 Earnings
Whisper number and provide the  analysts comfort with the current management
team and the upcoming quarters. If  this can be accomplished during the
conference call on Thursday, some analysts  believe the stock could reach $35
in the very near term. You may listen to  Oracle's conference call at
http://www.nasdaq.com/reference/broadcast_oracle.htm  beginning at 5:30 PM ET
on Thursday.

Click here to visit our Sponsor!

(c) Copyright 2000, EarningsWhispers.com

To  unsubscribe from the Whisper Report, please click here.
http://www.earningswhispers.com/unsubscribe.asp


It is with regret that I have to announce that Jeff Skilling is leaving Enron.  Today, the Board of Directors accepted his resignation as President and CEO of Enron.  Jeff is resigning for personal reasons and his decision is voluntary.  I regret his decision, but I accept and understand it.  I have worked closely with Jeff for more than 15 years, including 11 here at Enron, and have had few, if any, professional relationships that I value more.  I am pleased to say that he has agreed to enter into a consulting arrangement with the company to advise me and the Board of Directors.
Now it's time to look forward.
With Jeff leaving, the Board has asked me to resume the responsibilities of President and CEO in addition to my role as Chairman of the Board.  I have agreed.  I want to assure you that I have never felt better about the prospects for the company.  All of you know that our stock price has suffered substantially over the last few months.  One of my top priorities will be to restore a significant amount of the stock value we have lost as soon as possible.  Our performance has never been stronger; our business model has never been more robust; our growth has never been more certain; and most importantly, we have never had a better nor deeper pool of talent throughout the company.  We have the finest organization in American business today.  Together, we will make Enron the world's leading company.
On Thursday at 10:00 a.m. Houston time, we will hold an all employee meeting at the Hyatt.  We will broadcast the meeting to our employees around the world where technically available, and I look forward to seeing many of you there.


-----Original Message-----
From:  djcustomclips@djinteractive.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-djcustomclips+40djinteractive+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 4:31 AM
To: 290742@mailman.enron.com
Subject: Cable Open Access: Ex-Gore Aide Simon Will Lobby for Enron.(Greg
Simon, hired by Enron    Corp ...

Ex-Gore Aide Simon Will Lobby for Enron.(Greg Simon, hired by Enron Corp. to
be lobbyist)(Brief Article)
TED HEARN

07/02/2001
Multichannel News
10
Copyright 2001 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2001 Cahners
Publishing Company
WASHINGTON -- Greg Simon, who spearheaded the cable open-access effort for
America Online Inc. after leaving the Clinton White House, has signed up to
lobby for Enron Corp., the Houston-based energy trading company with close
political ties to the Bush Administration.
Simon -- a top media and telecommunications adviser to former Vice President
Al Gore and founder of his own lobbying firm, called Simon Strategies --
filed a lobbying-registration form with the clerk of the House of
Representatives on June 18. He also registered Simon Strategies assistants
Kristan Van Hook and Ann Morton as Enron lobbyists.
On the form, Simon said he planned to lobby the White House, Congress, the
Commerce Department and the Federal Communications Commission "in furtherance
of national policies that support competitive access by content providers to
broadband communications networks."
Simon declined to discuss his Enron duties, except to say  he was lobbing for
the company directly, indicating that Enron was not joining Simon's OpenNet
coalition -- the group once funded by AOL to pressure the FCC and Congress to
impose open Internet access mandates on the cable industry.
"I am not registered to do [Enron's] press for them," Simon said in a phone
interview. "You have to talk to them about what they want to say to the
press. That's not what they want me to do unless they give me the go-ahead to
do that."
Enron is a $100 billion energy company with a broadband-services division.
The company signed a video-on-demand deal with Blockbuster Inc., which
collapsed in March with each side blaming the other for the venture's
failure.
Enron chairman Kenneth Lay is a longtime informal adviser to President Bush
on energy issues. He was one of 212 individuals who each raised $100,000 for
the Bush campaign, while Enron provided corporate jets for Bush campaign
officials, according to U.S. News and World Report.
Wendy L. Gramm, wife of Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), is an Enron board
director, according to Enron's company Web site.
U.S. News also reported that Enron employees gave $1.3 million to the GOP
last year. It also stated that three Bush administration officials -- senior
adviser Karl Rove, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis Libby, and
top economic policy adviser Lawrence Lindsey - each owned at least $50,000 in
Enron stock, though Rove has moved to sell the shares.
Sources said Simon is planning to revive the open-access issue on behalf of
Enron and The Walt Disney Co. and perhaps expand the effort to include
nondiscrimination by cable operators against unaffiliated
interactive-television providers. Enron did not return phone calls seeking
comment.
A Disney official has repeatedly said that the company has made no decision
about joining any open-access or ITV coalition.
A source who recently met with Simon said the lobbyist indicated his Enron
job would deal with open access to cable facilities.
"What he said suggested to me that he has had conversations with [Enron and
Disney], and it does seem that those companies have something in common on
open access," the sources said.
Another source said Enron, which owns an 18,000-mile global fiber-optic
network, was looking to deliver content from that plant to end users over the
last mile controlled by cable and phone companies.
"Their interest is, essentially, access to the local loop," the source said.
Cable industry sources said they were puzzled by Simon's latest move and
didn't have a clear sense of where he would begin to apply pressure.
One cable industry wag quipped, "Enron is a major content provider of oil,
gas and electricity."
All Simon would say is that he is "representing Enron Broadband directly.
Anything more, you have to talk to Enron about. I make it a habit not to put
words in my client's mouth."
Folder Name: Cable Open Access
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 93
______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


See below to see what "The Man" has to say.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001 09:44
AM ---------------------------

Ora_L._Ash@dom.com on 01/05/2001 09:34:31 AM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Contract 571492

Yes, you can flow 100%.   I confirmed that this was a part ot the rate case
settlement.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 01/05/2001 09:50:36 AM

To:   Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES
cc:

Subject:  Re: Contract 571492

In the old days, you could only flow 7/12 of the MDQ from secondary points.
That was when these contracts were good for the whole year.  So you are
telling me the "rules have changed"?  I can now flow 100% from secondary
points?

Ora_L._Ash@dom.com on 01/05/2001 08:38:35 AM

To:   Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: Contract 571492

You can use the full contract MDQ to move from and to secondary points.  Of
course,  this would be subject to any secondary restrictions.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 01/04/2001 04:48:44 PM

To:   Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES
cc:

Subject:  Contract 571492

We have a FTGSS contract with a MDQ of 40,148 dts.  The primary receipt
point on this contract is storage.  BUT, we can flow some of this gas from
secondary points like Oakford or the Pools.  How much gas can be sourced
from Secondary receipt points?


I would like to move to the new garage.  Let me know what I need to do.

	Parking & Transportation@ENRON
	Sent by: DeShonda Hamilton@ENRON
	05/03/2001 03:08 PM

		 To: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica I Arriaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Barber/Enron@EnronXGate, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christine
Drummond/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal Elrod/Enron@EnronXGate,
Lisa Gillette/Enron@EnronXGate, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Kerrigan/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin
Kuykendall/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrew H Lewis/Enron@EnronXGate, Molly
Magee/Enron@EnronXGate, Kim Melodick/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris
Meyer/Enron@EnronXGate, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Norden/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/enron@enronXgate, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adriana Celedon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Graves/Enron@EnronXGate, Wilford
Stevens/Enron@EnronXGate, Soo-Lian Eng Ervin/Enron@EnronXGate, Dorie
Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle
Kettler/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad
McSherry/Enron@EnronXGate, Patti Sullivan/Enron@EnronXGate, Hope
Vargas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Louis Allen/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raquel
Lopez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Enron Center Garage

The Enron Center Garage has opened.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new
building and currently park in the Allen Center and Metropolitan garage are
being offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the
new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The
cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is
currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly
employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to
the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made
as spaces become available.

The Saturn Sky Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be
opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street
level entrance to Enron Center North until Saturn Sky Ring access is
available. Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be
used as an exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to
Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your
email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and
receive a parking transponder along with a new information packet for the new
garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and
Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.

(You may enter & exit on Clay St. and Bell St., also pedestrians, will have
to use the garage stairwell located on the corner of Bell & Smith.)

Please respond via e-mail if you are interested in acquiring one of these
spaces.


nope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

whatever.  so i was right about your puff break wasn't i?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thats my goal

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you actually know what that is?  i'm impressed!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

why am i a fink

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:35 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are all talk.  and you are a fink.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i know im all talk, ill be down in a little while

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you have all the answers don't you?  don't you think that someone will figure out your little plan?  oh and thanks for coming down here and giving me some news.....fink


I meant 2001.

Scott Neal
10/24/2000 10:25 AM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin
Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 top target customers

I would like each of you to list your top 5-10 target customers for 2000 by
12pm tomorrow.  Please let me know if you have any questions.


8:47:59 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Sanders, Richard B.'
8:47:59 Synchronizing Hierarchy
8:48:00 Synchronizing Favorites
8:48:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
8:48:37 	   54 item(s) added to offline folder
8:48:37 	   1 item(s) updated in offline folder
8:48:37 	   1 item(s) changed read-state in offline folder
8:48:37 	   9 item(s) deleted in offline folder
8:48:37 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
8:48:37 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
8:48:40 	   9 item(s) added to offline folder
8:48:40 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
8:48:43 	   14 item(s) added to offline folder
8:48:43 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
8:48:43 	   3 item(s) deleted in offline folder
8:48:43 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
8:48:44 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
8:48:44 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
8:48:44 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
8:48:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
8:48:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
8:48:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
8:48:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
8:48:45 	   3 item(s) deleted in offline folder
8:48:45 Synchronizing Views
8:48:46 Synchronizing Forms
8:48:47 Done


Thanks.  I think that's, well, a very aggressive view of how IOU debt and past and forward DWR costs are likely to be treated.  Be happy to discuss further if you like.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Evelyn Kahl [mailto:ek@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Jeff:

1.	Yes, very likely.

2.	415.421.4143

3.	I've been faced with implementing DA deals this last week.  I've heard
two marketers say that there will be no "exit fees" -- i.e., no
responsibility for utility debt or past or forward DWR costs.  Is this a
commonly held view (or fantasy) among marketers?

Evie

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Thanks, Evie.

1) If someone writes a decent appeal, might you folks be interested in
signing?
2) Do you have Michael's # where I can reach him tomorrow.  Sorry for
the bother.  And if you'd like to hear about what we're thinking about
regarding QFs, be happy to share it with you as well.

Be safe,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Evelyn Kahl [mailto:ek@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Hi Jeff:

1.    Don't know at this point what if anything we'll do.  We haven't,
as you undoubtedly seen, taken a lead on DA issues.  We do, however,
have another case up our sleeve that would aid DA should it come to be.
More when that develops.

2.    Yes, Michael does QF work.  He typically works with the QFs who
have contracts to sell power; I work more on the consumer side with the
QFs who build primarily to self-serve.    (In other words, he looks more
a power generation, I look more at end-user issues.)  Certainly feel
free to call him.  He's in DC today at the RTO workshops, but I believe
he'll be here tomorrow.

Hope you're safe and well.

E

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:47 PM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Hi Evie:

Two quick things:

1) My understanding is that the PUC has denied the applications for
rehearing.  There's a group that is fixing to take it to the court of
appeals level--can't see any downside ( a) argument is that the PUC
erred in its decisionmaking--no record, no facts, no evidence, etc., and
that it needs to go back to the drawing board and get the process right
before it suspends anything--and b) the heavy-lifting was already done
getting the app. for rehrng prepared).  Seems like getting a chance to
re-argue at the PUC has alot of positives.  Were you planning on doing
anything?

2) I want to talk to Michael Alcantar about some interesting QF ideas,
but wanted to check with you first.  Frankly, I'm ignorant as to whether
that still occupies a big spot on his plate, if he represents the same
folks, etc., and thought I'd check with you first.

Hope (all things considered) you're doing well.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Kam,
The data-base-id for all Canadian books has been changed to 'CANADA' from ERMS on the database.
We will also create the corresponding basis book-id for the Canada Price books in the Canada book mapping table.
Over the next week, I will talk with Zhi and get this setup so that once the entries are created in the ERMS tables, we will automatically update the same in RisktRAC.

Regards,
Ramesh


Gabriel,

I'm not sure if Binh sent an email to you and to Controls to explain the
Canadian origination variance.  You may already be aware, but on the Orig
Sched the originations are converted to $US using the spot rate for the day.
However when the originations are calculated for the Report tab the rate
applied is the average rate for the month.  Therefore these values will never
be the same.  Nicole is going to talk to Kathy when she gets back to Canada
on Monday.  Nicole says she has found a way to modify their spreadsheet so
that both values are calculated using the daily spot rate.   If you haven't
recieved an email from Binh explaining this issue you might want to forward
the attached message from Nicole to Michael and Chris.

Thanks,
Robin

PS The Bench by trader tied out for the 23rd.  I'll be in a little early
tomorrow to tie it out for the 24th.  Bye.
---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000
11:43 PM ---------------------------

Nicole LaPorte
08/24/2000 01:20 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Origination Problem

Robin,
I spoke with Kathy regarding the problem we are having with origination. Her
explanation is as follows:
This is an fx issue. Because origination is denominated in a currency (USD)
which is different than our functional currency (CAD), origination expense
will be comprised of not only origination but also currency gains and losses
on origination. Everyday orig. is retranslated in C$ using the current rate
and any fx gains or losses relating to that is added to origination.
Therefore, the total origination as per the "origination" tab will NOT equal
the origination as per the "report" tab. Robin should add in the translation
gains/losses to get it to reconcile.
I hope this explanation makes sense and is acceptable. I know you're used to
the two numbers reconciling but since we were asked to denominate our
origination in US dollars (about 2 months ago) these two numbers will never
again be the same.
Please call if you have any questions,
Nicole


Not too sure how important, but wanted everyone to see the discussion from Jamie Wimberley at CAEM.

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jamie Wimberly" <Benjamin.Wimberly@Verizon.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jamie+20Wimberly+22+20+3CBenjamin+2EWimberly+40Verizon+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	kmalloy@caem.org
Subject:	Response from Jamie Wimberly

Jim:

Thank you for your thoughtful response.  Even if Enron is a "hot button"
these days, we remain big fans of yours.

In regard to your comments on the letter, I disagree with some of the
assertions.

First, I am fairly confident that no major piece of energy legislation
will be passed this year.  As you can see from the attached
congressional update for the DE Task Force prepared by Bev Jones (former
VP for Consolidated Natural Gas), Jimmy Hayes (former Member of
Congress, and Nancy Etkin (former head of Natural Gas Vehicle
Coalition), there is every indication that legislation is going to get
bottled up in the Senate.  I agree with the assessment.

Moreover, the legislation that is being considered has almost nothing in
it of direct relevance to "getting it right" in regard to restructuring.
Without pressure, I expect no federal leadership on restructuring
issues.  While I do agree that commissions are usually a stalling
tactic, both Ken and I are dismayed at the lack of focus, resources
(i.e., DOE has devoted almost nothing of any sort to restructuring) and
lack of qualified personnel directed at promoting more competition in
the energy market.  While you and I may have some idea of what is
necessary (and that is a stretch for me -- given the complexity of the
challenges), I can safely say the vast majority of folks have no idea
what to do -- especially about the tricky jurisdictional questions
involved.

I personally think one way to craft a "new federalism" on restructuring
is to bribe the states into more action.  The federal government does
this with education, housing, etc.  Why not with restructuring?  A
carrot for those states which are moving forward, linked to definite
metrics of progress and openness.

I also strongly believed that state PUCS and federal agencies like FERC
are being pushed to the limit about what they can accomplish given
declining budgets and personnel.  I further think that this slows the
whole process down.  Think about it -- telephone deregulation, a growing
crisis in regard to water, record levels of mergers and acquisitions,
historic changes in regard to natural gas and electric regulation -- all
piled on top of each other for these folks.

Good catch on the numbering of the recommendations cited in the letter.
This has been corrected.

I look forward to seeing you in September at the Board meeting.

Jamie

P.S.   Speaking of the DE Task Force, have you and Bob Frank made a
decision yet to participate?  I hope you do, but I need to know as soon
as possible.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Jamie Wimberly (E-mail)
Cc: Shelk, John
Subject: Letter from Leadership Council to Bush WH

Jamie --

Thank you for keeping me in the loop on your activities.  While I am
always supportive of more public statements pushing competition, neither
I nor Enron can sign on to the letter.

First, I am concerned that having Enron sign on will distract from your
messages.  Enron is a "hot button" in DC and will change the proper
focus.

In addition, I would argue that the recommendation for a national
commission is out of place with the current timing of FERC and
Congressional action -- which is imminent -- while a commission would
delay action on the Hill and at FERC, thus supporting the forces against
competition.  Let's not study this too much - we know what to do.  Move
away from the commission.

Also, I'm not sure how providing federal grant money only to states that
promote competition supports our efforts.  Making GA pay for PA is a
distraction from the main fights at FERC and on the Hill.

Finally, I would guess that more funds to FERC and other agencies will
only be used to increase enforcement against those in the industry.
While Enron wants markets that work well, the core problem is that we
haven't deregulated enough - not that markets aren't working.

Also, I don't know where the recommendation numbers from the Bush/Cheney
plan came from -- I think it was an earlier document -- there are no
such numbers in the final printed version of the report that I have.

If you want to talk, please let me know.

Thanks,

Jim

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - DE leg update Aug 27.doc


Here is the correct summary -- my apologies for the error.

Entergy Services, Inc.  ER01-1866-000, ER01-1593-000 and ER01-159-001.  Interconnection and Operating Agreement. On March 21, 2001, Entergy Services, Inc. files an unexecuted interconnection and operating agreement with the following parties: Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, a joint action agency organized and existing under the laws of the State of Mississippi, composed of the Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission of the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi (Clarksdale) and the Public Service Commission of Yazoo City of the City of Yazoo City Mississippi (Yazoo City); Clarksdale; and Yazoo City.  On May 29, 2001, FERC accepted and suspended Entergy Services, Inc.'s March 21, 2001 agreement -- subject to hearing, settlement discussions, and refund -- to be effective May 1, 2001. FERC accepted the proposed generator imbalance agreement, to be effective May 1, 2001.  On April 25, 2001, Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy Services), acting as agent for Entergy Mississippi, Inc., submitted an unexecuted network integration transmission service agreement and an unexecuted network operating agreement with 1) Mississippi Delta Energy Agency; 2) the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi; and 3) the City of Yazoo City, Mississippi, to be effective as of May 1, 2001.  On June 14, FERC issues an order in which it accepts for filing, subject to the outcome of an evidentiary hearing and settlement procedures, and suspends for a nominal period, an unexecuted Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement (NITSA) and an unexecuted Network Operating Agreement (NOA) between Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy) and the following entities:  Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and the City of Yazoo, Mississippi.  FERC also grants Entergy's request for waiver of the 60-day prior notice requirement to permit the NITSA and NOA to become effective May 1, 2001, subject to refund.  Pursuant to Rule 603 of FERC's Rules of Practice and Procedure, FERC also sets the agreements for hearing, but holds the hearing in abeyance pending settlement discussions between the parties.  FERC also consolidates Docket No. ER01-1866-000 with Docket Nos. ER01-1593-000 and ER01-1593-001.  Request for Rehearing due July 13.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Tapscott, Ron; Acevedo, Rudy; Carson, Mike; Connor, Joe; Fairley, David; Forney, John M.; Garcia, Miguel L.; Hernandez, Juan; Herndon, Rogers; Johnston, Elizabeth; Kim, Grace; Kroll, Heather; Lotz, Gretchen; Mccormick, George; McNamara, Ron; Pagan, Ozzie; Podurgiel, Laura; Rust, Bill; Saibi, Eric; Staines, Dan; Terrell, Jim; Wagner, Joseph; Wilson, Jeffrey
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Steffes, James
Subject:	Entergy/MDEA interconnect update

You have probably already received a report of the interconnect agreement described below.  The updated portion, describing FERC's order issued last week, appears in italics.  If you would like more information please let me know.

Susan Scott Lindberg
713.853.0596
sscott3@enron.com

***
Commonwealth Edison Company.  ER00-3668-001.  Settlement Issues.  Commonwealth Edison proposed to install equipment at its East Frankfort substation (East Frankfort) to accommodate the 138 kV interconnection of University Park's 300 MW peaking generation facility.  Under the agreements, University Park is wholly responsible for the costs of relocating two 345 kV transmission lines and one 12 kV line at East Frankfort. On November 8, 2000, FERC accepted and suspended Commonwealth Edison's September 12 agreements, subject to refund and subject to Commonwealth Edison making a compliance filing to: 1) set out specific charges for the proposed interconnection of University Park's generation facility (together with supporting documentation); and 2) provide support for the proposed direct assignment of facilities to University Park.  On June 4, 2000, regarding Commonwealth Edison's revisions to its unexecuted interconnection agreement filed in compliance with FERC's November 8 order, FERC: 1) accepted the proposed charge of $900,000 for a T-tap connection and $300,000 ($1.2 million) for protective relaying as directly assignable to University Park; 2) rejected Commonwealth Edison's estimated $9 million for the enhancement of East Frankfort and other changes to the September 12 interconnection agreement not contemplated in the November 8 order; and 3) rejected Commonwealth Edison's proposed $1.5 million charge related to the line relocation costs, set this matter for hearing, and held the hearing in abeyance pending settlement discussions between the parties.  On June 12, the Chief Judge issues an order designating a settlement judge, Judge Jacob Leventhal, and directing him to convene a settlement conference, to explore the possibility of settlement, to discuss the differences between the parties, and in general to conduct the settlement negotiations.  Chief Judge also directs all parties to have persons present at the settlement negotiations with authority to negotiate and accept or approve settlement terms. Chief Judge explains that Judge Leventhal will be available to meet with the parties individually or in groups, in person or by telephone prior to the conference.  Further, he states that a settlement conference will convene in a FERC hearing room on June 21, 2001 at 10:00 A.M.


I have not seen the increased volumes.  I will ask andy tomorrow about them.
The original 13K and 30 K are in Sitara.
PL


Vincent,

Sorry for a delay in responding to your message.
I shall be very glad to write a letter of recommendation.
Please, send me the forms.

I hope you are doing OK.

Vince

Vincent Tang <tang_vincent@yahoo.com> on 02/28/2001 01:10:33 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Recommendation letter

Dear Vince,

How are you?

I am just wondering whether you have received the
email I sent to you a couple of weeks back.  In that
email, I asked whether you would have time to write me
a recommendation letter to support my application for
a Master Program (Mathematical Finance) in Columbia
University this coming fall.  If you will be able to
write the letter, would you please let me know?
Thanks a lot.

Best Regards,

Vincent Tang

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


The following is a list of staff that need updating on your OASIS site.  As
discussed please Email
the user names and passwords for the new accounts directly to the users
indicated below.

Please remove the following users from your site.

Morse
Webb
Hickle
Halmark
Burger
Haile
Zarritta
Norman

Please add the following users to your site.

Miguel Garcia    miguel.l.garcia@enron.com      (713) 853-5458
Rudy Acevedo      rudy.acevedo@enron.com     (713) 853-7171
Juan Hernandez  juan.hernandez@enron.com       (713) 853-0383
Gretchen Lotz     gretchen.lotz@enron.com    (713) 853-6261
Maria Valdes      maria.valdes@enron.com     (713) 853-6350
Smith Day       smith.l.day@enron.com          (713) 853-4201
Laura Podurgiel laura.podurgiel@enron.com  (713) 853-6470 (if this is a
active account please rest the password)

If you have any questions please call me at 713-853-3383.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Binh Pham/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 10:04 AM
---------------------------

Hang Bui
04/26/2000 09:49 AM
To: "Le, Hien" <HLe@cei-crescent.com>, Binh Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, tbui@uh.edu
cc:
Subject: FW: Fw: cuckoo clock

---------------------- Forwarded by Hang Bui/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 09:49 AM
---------------------------
To: Hang Bui@ect, Misti Day@ECT, Daniel Falcone@ENRON,
Subject: FW: Fw: cuckoo clock

Subject: FWD: Fw: cuckoo clock

The other night I was invited out for a night with the "boys".  I told my
wife that i would be home by midnight...promise!  Well, the hours passed and
the beer was going down way too easy.  At around 3 A.M., drunk as a skunk, I
headed home.  Just as I got in the door, the cuckoo clock in the hall
started up, and cuckooed 3 times.  Quickly, I realized she'd probably wake
up, so I cuckooed another 9 times.  I was really proud of myself, having a
quick, witty solution, even when smashed, to escape a possible conflict.
Next morning my wife asked me what time I got in and I told her 12 o'clock.
She didn't seem disturbed at all.  Whew!  Got away with that one!  She then
told me that we needed a new cuckoo clock.  When I asked her why she said
"Well, it cuckooed 3 times, then said "oh fuck", cuckooed 4 more times,
cleared it's throat, cuckooed another 3 times, giggled, cuckooed twice more,
and then farted.


Kay,

I don't know if Rahil forwarded this to you or not, but here is the VEPCO term sheet.

H

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:33 PM
To:	Karla Haislip (E-mail); Jim Hayes (E-mail); John J. Mable (E-mail)
Cc:	Kroll, Heather
Subject:	Follow-up from our meeting
Importance:	High

Karla, John, and Jim,

It was good meeting with you at your offices last week.  Attached is a draft proposal highlighting the new structure we had agreed upon during our discussions.  Please review the proposal and comment as necessary, as agreeing upon a common premise will help us move forward more efficiently.  We will be meeting again later this week to discuss the various options that are available, and would appreciate your feedback with respect to specific structures, definitions, etc. you may have in mind (and that we may not have captured here).

Feel free to call either Heather or myself with questions or ideas at anytime.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Rahil
713.853.3206


?
Subject: Click and go to http://www.enerfax.com if can not view  properly.htm

?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
																					[IMAGE]

														[IMAGE]

																			Click here for  a daily email link

																Enerfax Daily

																												[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]

																									Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 6,  2000? -? ? Need a  Past Issue
-Click Here

																																	[IMAGE]

																							Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 6, 2000

																									[IMAGE]
																																[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																													Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 5? -?  November 6, 2000

																														[IMAGE]

																									CFTC  Report Shows Speculators Neutral on Energy Futures

																									?  ? ?Speculators maintained a neutral position on crude and  heating oil
futures for the week ending last Tuesday, having cut  bets on rising prices
they made a few weeks ago, according to the  CFTC report. The neutral posture
helps to explain why the market has  had trouble getting out of the recent
price range. As a group, the  hedge funds are not looking for a rally or a
big decline, they're  just watching for fresh indicators. Crude oil prices
have been  between about $32 and $34 per barrel on the NYMEX since
mid-October,  after a brief rally to $37. Prices closed Friday at $32.71 per
barrel. Speculators had bought 39,480 crude oil contracts and sold  40,373
contracts, giving them a net short position of 893 contracts.  The funds held
net-long positions for most of the year, with a peak  of 47,171 lots in
February. Similarly, speculators' heating oil bets  were almost neutral. Net
long positions were 1,436 lots after  declining every week from a high for
the year of 25,780 lots on  September 12th. The following table shows the
changes.

																									Contract? ? ? ?Date? ?  ?Longs? ? ?Shorts? ? Longs Minus  Shorts
																									Crude? ? ? ? ?Oct. 31?  ?39,480? ? 40,373? ? ? ? ?  ?-893
																									Crude? ? ? ? ?Oct. 24?  ?35,427? ? 39,316? ? ? ?  ?-3,889
																									Heating Oil? ?Oct. 31?  ?12,574? ? 11,138? ? ? ? ?  1,436
																									Heating Oil? ?Oct. 24? ?14,484?  ? ?6,277? ? ? ? ? 8,207
																									Gasoline? ? ? Oct. 31? ? 6,377?  ? ?5,092? ? ? ? ? 1,285
																									Gasoline? ? ? Oct. 24? ? 5,525?  ? ?6,056? ? ? ? ? ?-531
																									Natural Gas? ?Oct. 31? ?13,023? ?  ?9,924? ? ? ? ? 3,099
																									Natural  Gas? ?Oct. 24? ?17,018? ?  ?8,524? ? ? ? ? 8,494

																															[IMAGE]

																															Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 6? -?  November 6, 2000

																														[IMAGE]

																														Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 6, 2000

																												[IMAGE]

																								ONEOK and Duke Signed Long Term Transportation  Agreement

																								?  ? ONEOK and Duke Energy have signed a long term natural gas
transportation agreement under which ONEOK will transport all the  volumes
needed to power a 500 MW Power Plant in Oklahoma owned by  Duke. ONEOK Gas
Transportation's pipeline system will move up to  85,000 MMBtu per day to
Duke's combined cycle McClain Energy  Facility in Newcastle. Financial
details of the agreement were not  disclosed.

																													[IMAGE]

																										Financial Summary

																															[IMAGE]

																						")} TC
																		[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img14.gif
 - img15.gif
 - img16.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img8.gif
 - img26.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img27.gif


-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Rawlings-Curtis [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:31 AM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Hey you..........

Just thought I'd say good morning.  Want to send you a song I downloaded by
Coldplay called "Trouble".  Makes me think of you, but in a good way.  Send
me Marks e-address, or pass mine on to him please, he needs to send me some
dirty jokes!  Hope to hear from you soon. - Christina

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Hey stranger,

Haven't talked to you in while, how are things going?  The trip was absolutely incredible.  We went scuba diving, swam with stingrays and drank enough (rum for me personally) to drown a large school of fish.

Anyway, I've decided I'm a no go for Austin this Thursday night.  I'm already exhausted and Jen Bowles offered to drive Friday morning so I've decided to take her up on the offer.  After the Caymans last weekend, Lisa's wedding this weekend and San Diego next weekend I've decided my best move is to try and conserve some energy.  Regardless, I will see you and Doug Saturday night and we'll do our catching up then.  My parents are coming to the wedding as well so I'm sure they'll want to have a nice chat with you and Doug.

Talk to you soon,
Susan

Hope Law Review isn't wearing you too thin.


We are trying to think of something nice to send to Patti to show her our
appreciation for her hard work.  I was thinking of a gift basket from SPECS
with some nice wine.  Can you tell me what kind of wine she likes or suggest
another alternative for a gift that she may enjoy.  Thanks.


(1) 281 292 1469
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


I assume you mean a master between Garden State and ENA?  Please let me know
where we are in the whole process.  thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 07:18
AM ---------------------------

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   09/20/2000 10:32 AM

To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Citibank/Garden State Paper Q3 transaction

Garden State is still me.

From:  Paul Radous @ ENRON
         09/20/2000 10:13 AM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Citibank/Garden State Paper Q3 transaction

Tanya,

You have been leading this up to this point.  Do you wish to continue, or did
you need an assist?

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Radous/Corp/Enron on 09/20/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 09/20/2000 09:16 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Citibank/Garden State Paper Q3 transaction

All:  I met with Rodney Malcolm and Finley Biggerstaff about the two 7-year
paper swaps between each of Garden State/CITI and ENA/CITI.  Who will be
handling credit for the new master and the transactions in general?  I am
told that this is a Q3 deal.  Thanks.  Sara

Molly:  I left you a vm about prior efforts to amend the ENA/CITI master.
Weren't ;you speaking wth someone at Citibank?


Hi Steve & Ben,

We are planning an early Sunday dinner (one of the few evening slots that are
free in Vince's schedule) at:

Diverso Restaurant
85 Piccadilly
London W1V 9HD
Tel: 020 7491 2222

It's just a few yards to the left of Park Lane hotel on Park Lane, close to
Hyde Park Corner underground and we've been there before.  Vince would like
to discuss the latest developments and it seems like the best opportunity to
do so.  Please let me know if you can make it and I can make sure the table
is booked accordingly.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383

P.S. Vince will be staying at the Park Lane Hotel, telephone number 0171 499
6321


sara

fyi - i am awaiting a rsponse from paul

justin

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Boyd, Justin
Sent: 16 May 2001 15:09
To: Boyd, Justin
Subject: RE: Total International Ltd.

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 16/05/2001 15:13
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
15/05/2001 08:06
To: Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Total International Ltd.

Paul

it's always been my impression that CRM assesses each C/P to determine
whether it meets not only the SFA but also the CFTC test....[although it is
true that in many cases if the SFA test is met so will be the CFTC one

can we chat...

Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 15/05/2001 08:08
---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 14/05/2001 18:26 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Total International Ltd.

Justin:

What lawyer handles daily financial trading issues?  I need to speak with
that person about US swap eligibility rules governing US companies,
specifically, ECTRIC, and who evaluates ECTRIC's counterparties for
eligibility.  The specific issue has to do with Total as you will see from
the string of emails attached.  I look forward to hearing from you.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 06:22 PM -----

	Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate 05/08/2001 02:23 PM 	   To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT  Subject: RE: Total
International Ltd.

Sara,

ECTRI is a UK registered company.  As a subsidiary of ENA, which is
registered under US law, can my trader sleave deals through ECTRI to get
around the eligibiilty issue.  We are working with Total to get a
confidentiality agreement signed but it is taking awhile and we will not be
receiving financial statements to evidence eligibility for another three
weeks.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Maley, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:56 AM
To: Reves, Brant
Subject: RE: Total International Ltd.

Brant
For SFA purposes as they are ulitmately owned by a quoted company on a
recognised stock exchange then this is sufficient to sign them off.   I don't
really know whether this makes them an elligible swap participant for the US
though.
Paul

From: Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/05/2001 09:59 CDT
To: Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Total International Ltd.

I am not quite sure I understand.  Does SFA requirements mean you have a
guaranty, financial statements, or other material that establishes them as an
eligible derivative customer.  One of our marketers continues to try and
trade with them and I still don't fully understand how they are open in
London.  Does meeting SFA requirements establish this customer as an eligible
counterparty under US statutes?

brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Maley, Paul
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Reves, Brant
Cc: Jackson, Lee; Shackleton, Sara
Subject: Re: Total International Ltd.

Brant
We have passed them for SFA requirements in London so yes they can trade
through London no problem at all.  (see Regulatory tab in CAS)
Any problems, let me know.
Paul

From: Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/05/2001 08:30 CDT
To: Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lee Jackson/ENRON@enronXgate, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Total International Ltd.

Paul,

I have a trader that is trying to trade financially with Total International
Ltd., but we have asked that he not until we can sort our some eligibility
issues.  Prior to speaking with Ben Hamida at Total last week, we had never
approached them for financial statements or a guaranty that would establish
them as elibible contract parties.  I noticed that we have significant
financial trading with them in London.  How have you established eligibilty?
My trader is asking, since he cannot trade under ENA with Total, if he can
sleave deals through London.

Any ideas or insight would be helpful.

thanks
brant


---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
04/25/2000 02:10 PM ---------------------------

Brent A Price@ECT
04/25/2000 02:05 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio
Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G
Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Inga
Latson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Organizational Changes

Please forward this e-mail to your teams regarding recent organizational
changes within Gas Operations.


You didnt send this to SoCalGas, on purpose obviously.  What are we going to
do if we get way out ahead of them early on in this process?  Shouldn't re
reconnoiter with Bilas first?   Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:27 AM
To: Colin.Cushnie@sce.com
Cc: burkee@cts.com; craigc@calpine.com; Douglas.Porter@sce.com;
INGGM@sce.com; jdasovic@enron.com; MDay@GMSSR.com;
Michael.Alexander@sce.com; Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; Tom Beach
Subject: Re:

Folks.  Let me throw out a proposal.  I believe that we should immediately
draft a very brief letter or press release that explains why the PD is
misguided and will lead to very bad energy policy for the state, and why
our settlement is the right one and why it's good energy policy for the
state.  The letter should be signed by everyone who signed the settlement.
It needs to be released by the end of this week.  Absent this kind of
action, nothing's going to turn this thing around.  Spending time and money
writing "comments" will be a waste of time and money.  We'll need to do a
lot more, but I think we have to start this way or fold up our tents now.
Thoughts?

Best,
Jeff

Colin.Cushnie

@sce.com             To:     "Tom Beach"
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
cc:     burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com,
11/27/2000           Douglas.Porter@sce.com,
INGGM@sce.com,
08:54 PM             jdasovic@enron.com, MDay@GMSSR.com,

Michael.Alexander@sce.com,

Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com,

rick.counihan@greenmountain.com

Subject:     Re:

I haven't had the opportunity to read the PD yet, but I share your
frustration with the Commission's inaction in the face of significant and
fast moving events.  Our settlement and electric restructuring are clearly
distinguishable.  Arguably, the status quo has, in part, perpetuated the
record high prices being observed of late.  The Commission should have
little to fear by proceeding with its initial direction of statewide
consistency in the intrastate gas industry.

"Tom Beach"

<tomb@crossbordere        To:     "Mike Day"
<MDay@GMSSR.com>,
nergy.com>                <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>,

<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
11/27/2000 03:19          <craigc@calpine.com>,
<burkee@cts.com>,
PM                        <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>,

Please respond to         <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>

"Tom Beach"               cc:     <INGGM@sce.com>,
<Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>
Subject:     Re:

If I'm reading pages 38 - 40 of the Bilas PD correctly, the Commission's
primary concern over the competitive benefits of city-gate pricing is the
fact that PG&E city-gate prices in October were much higher than border
prices plus transportation.  October bidweek PG&E city-gate prices were
high, but only because southern California prices plummeted from the high
levels that they had reached in late August and September, following the El
Paso explosion.  In November, the PG&E city-gate moved back into its normal
relationship with Topock and Malin prices.  For the Commission to be
spooked
by one month of price fluctuations is crazy.

I'm hopeful that my friends at Edison, in particular, can help the
Commission to distinguish what we were trying to achieve in the CS on the
gas side from the mess that is electric restructuring....

Tom Beach

----- Original Message -----
From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
To: <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>; <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>;
<burkee@cts.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>;
<jdasovic@enron.com>; <MDay@GMSSR.com>; <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>
Cc: <Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>; <INGGM@sce.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:27 PM

> The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
> thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
> Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
> have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that
the
> timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.
>
> (See attached file: Proposed.doc)
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>


FYI-- "E" in the weekly report is the $5 million FERC penalty against Kinder
Morgan (for KN marketing affiliate violations).  You all may know this, but
the FPA has similar penalty provisions for "knowing and willful" violations.
Apparently though, it takes much more than simply winning a complaint (like
Aquila v. Entergy, for example) to get FERC to threaten to refer the case to
the DOJ for penalties.  I was wondering why Commissioner Massey filed the
concurrence in Aquila complaining of the lack of sticks FERC has since it
cannot award damages to the winning party and talked briefly with Dan W about
it.  Perhaps if FERC finds some pattern of behavior in abuses by electric
companies from the new data, it will result in some penalties.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000
02:31 PM ---------------------------

Janet Butler@ENRON
03/31/2000 05:13 PM
To: Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Howard
Fromer/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enronn@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Kathleen E
Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES,
Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Edith Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denis
Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FERC Weekly Electric Report

Attached is the FERC Weekly Report for week ending March 24.

Also attached are supporting documents you may be interested in:


The original message is encrypted using Lotus Notes Public and Private Key security.  Encrypted messages cannot be migrated to Microsoft Exchange Server.