Watch out! The Basle Committee is just wrapping up a special holiday present
for bankers - the first-ever capital change for operational risk in banking.
The new proposals come on top of a wave of new ideas in measuring economic
capital for operational risk and managing down losses from people risk,
system risk, process risk and external threats. Hear some practical answers
to selecting methodologies for operational risk discussed by experts in our
Operational Risk iConference.

ERisk is pleased to announce an iConference on

Practical Methodologies for Operational Risk Management

Keynote Speaker: Tony Peccia, Vice President of Operational Risk at CIBC

Followed by a panel discussion, which will include the following
distinguished panelists:

Marcelo Cruz, Director of Operational Risk at UBS AG
Tony Peccia, Vice President of Operational Risk at CIBC
Karim Rajwani, Senior Manager of Operational Risk at Royal Bank of Canada

When: Thursday, December 14 at 12 noon EST/5 p.m. London time.

Topics to be covered: the battle between "quantitative" and "qualitative"
approaches, measuring the success of operational risk management, applying
large institution methodologies to smaller institutions, and much more.

Recommended background reading:
The Operational Risk piece in our Risk Jigsaw
You will need to log in to be able to click through to this tutorial, which
features insights from "expert witnesses" (including panelist Marcelo Cruz),
the 12 steps of the operational risk management process, and links to
additional resources.

Registration: This conference is totally free, and you can participate by
using any computer with Internet access and a telephone.

You will need to register for this conference in advance by clicking here

If you have any questions regarding our iConferences, please send email to
iConferences@erisk.com

See you at the iConference!

Your friends at ERisk.com (formerly eRisks.com)

P.S. The archived slides, polling results, and real-time replays of our
previous iConferences, including our last iConference on compensation for
risk managers, can be accessed here free of charge.

**************************************************************
Your Email:[vkamins@enron.com] is in our eRisks.com mailing list.
If you wish to unsubscribe from future mailings, please change your account
preferences
To subscribe, please register on our website.  [IMAGE]


Alan:
Two things.  1) Assuming that you're lead on the meeting (i.e., agenda, facilitate meeting)---if not, just let us know and we'll take the reins.  2) Seems appropriate to invite Jim to participate.  Sure he'll be interested.  Your call.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Alamo, Joseph
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday

Joseph,

Can you work with Sue and set up a call for Wed.  afternoon.  Perhaps the same call could be our weekly meeting since Sue and Jeff are tied up on Thurs.

GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday
Importance:	High

Oh dear.  Get a story straight?  That's moving the bar pretty darned high, ain't it?  Wednesday looks good for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Mara, Susan
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday

My recollections is that Paul wanted a meeting before meeting with commercial folks to "get our story straight."  Can you set that up? Wed afternoon would work for me.

GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara, Susan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Richter, Jeff; Swain, Steve
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	See you Thursday

Jeff and I are still planning to thumb our noses at the terrorists and fly up there on Thursday morning.  We were planning on a 10 am to 2 pm meeting, working through lunch. Does this sound good to you two?


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030605.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:   1.00 / Final:   0.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/6/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


I case I garbled mine, here 'tis.


Smart call on your part.  NOW we are using long haul FT to serve Doyel
instead of IT.  Whew!


Randy, give them what they want and lets move on - don't give another
guarantee provide the indemnity for the IRS and environmental claims.  Mark
if there is a flaw in my thinking let me know.

Joe, these guys have been exceedingly difficult to deal with - I would think
twice before we bring these guys into any Enron deal in the future.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
10:18 AM ---------------------------

Randal Maffett
01/04/2001 01:13 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fidelity update

Last week during the holidays, we made a lot of progress w/ Fidelity
regarding their "take-out" from the Partnership at Dallas.  We exchanged 2
drafts of a Letter Agreement which says ENA (or an affiliate) will buy their
99% LP interest in Landfill Gas Investments, LP (LGI) on or before Jan 31,
2001.  Included in our draft was a provision whereby the ENE Guaranty would
be extinguished.  However, late yesterday Fidelity came back and said they're
not willing to extinguish the Guaranty completely.  The way the deal w/
Fidelity will be structured, ENA will pay them the delta between the $5.2MM
initial payment they made less the accrued tax credits on the date we close
(est to be $300K+/-).  Fidelity wants 2 things:

protection in the event the IRS disallows/disqualifies the tax credits
accrued (i.e., the $300K), and
protection against any environmental claims that may have occurred while they
were a partner in LGI (June, 200 thru Jan, 2001).

There are 2 basic alternatives to consider:

replace the existing guaranty to LGI with a new guaranty to Fidelity with a
specific cap on the tax credit amount ($300K+/-) and with the same
environmental coverage (up to $5MM) as currently exists but restricting it to
issues which occurred while they were a partner.  The probability of either
ever being triggered is extremely remote.  Replacing the benefactor from LGI
to Fidelity is significant for us because it eliminates future environmental
exposure related to LGI as well as prevents potential future buyers of our LP
interest from seeing that ENE once was willing to issue such a guaranty.
replace the existing guaranty with an indemnity from ENA which provides
Fidelity with the same protection as alternative #1.  Per ENA accounting
since the amount of exposure is limited to $5.3MM in aggregate, this would
not be significant/material enough to be separately identified as a balance
sheet item.

The problem we have is Fidelity has a Guaranty "in hand" and unless you give
me approval to go back and structure our deal around them, we don't have any
leverage to get them to release it.  They are willing to work with us on
either of the 2 alternatives listed above.  This is the only remaining
commercial issue left w/ Fidelity.

Please advise or call to discuss further.  Ext. 33212.  Thanks!

RANDY


Attached is the statement we are using in response to the Maharashtra/Indian
government's invitation to meet to renegotiate.  We plan to decline requests
to elaborate.

John


Steve--touching back to a conversation we had two weeks ago, I have set an appointment to meet with Norm Coleman here in Minnesota to go over energy issues and Enron interests.  As a Mayor he has been heavily supported by Xcel (old NSP).  My sense is that he is going to line up along the lines of the Bush administration energy plan.  I'll send an e mail out to all on this list once I have met with him to keep everyone in the loop.

Sue Walden may already have contacted you about the timing on an event hosted by Mr. Lay for Norm in Houston.  The Coleman folks originally had wanted something this month, but it looks like a January or February date is going to work better.


Ken,

Thank you for the email addresses of Enron's Board of Directors.  I will
present my position to them.

The best attribute of a really good "Top Gun" is that they operate most
effectively in an offensive mode, not in a defensive mode.  Develop and
maintain your offensive positions and follow through.  Too bad about
Andy but, under the circumstances, replacing him is the start of a good
offense.

Good luck!

Neal Shaw

Neal Shaw
U.S. Energy Services, Inc.
Phone:  (402) 861-9520
Cell:      (402) 578-8897
Fax:      (402) 861-0461


Vince,

 Thanks for responding to Christian. I had replied earlier and said that EVT
is based on iid events, and is therefore not useful in weather, where there
is so much correlation going on. Jitendra from AA raised the same issue
yesterday.

Joe

Vince J Kaminski
08/22/2000 04:49 PM
To: Christian Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: extreme value theory applied to weathet

Christian,

About two years ago I asked Joe Hrgovcic
to look tinto EVT applications. As far as I know
he is the only person in the group, in addition to me, looking at EVT.

Vince

Christian Werner@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/18/2000 07:00:42 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: extreme value theory applied to weathet

---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
19/08/2000 10:06 ---------------------------

Christian Werner on 19/08/2000 02:08:56
To: Vince.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:

Subject: extreme value theory applied to weather

---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
19/08/2000 01:15 ---------------------------

Christian Werner on 19/08/2000 01:55:56
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:

Subject: extreme value theory applied to weather

Dear Vince,

Back in July, when you visited our Sydney office you mentioned extreme value
theory. I am wondering whether research is looking into the application
of extreme value theory to power and esp. to weather. In a recent news
article it was highlighted that a trend in the industry towards t_max, t_min,
etc.

I am in particular referring to the news article below:

http://213.219.22.254/i-wex/resources/ef290600.htm

In the past we have observed a similar trend where customers are asking for
t_max, t_min, or below or above precipitation structures. The choice in the
past has been the burn analysis on historical data. However, we are in
particular interested in the extreme events, and the application of EVT could
provide a meaningful tool for the analysis.

Has the research group looked into the application of EVT to weather? EVT has
a long history of application in hydrology (which would cover parts
of the precipitation structures...). Also, research (esp. at ETH in Zuerich)
is indicating the application of EVT to V@R....

Thank you!

Regards,
Christian


Hey,
What's going on?  I wanted to get up to date on recruiting.  I also wanted to
ask you something.  I heard some info from my wife regarding a kid that was
recruited and commited to UT from Jersey Village.
DG


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 05:45 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/14/01 05:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached.


Whoever wrote this did an excellent job


----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is a special product promotion brought to you by ThomsonFN.
If you do not wish to receive future mailings, please click below,
and simply send us a blank email.
mailto:remove-0aj4zh22a3s9txzbrgqg9vb0g6khz9y@adm.chtah.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Take Control Of Your Investing!

(Get the Knowledge and Information You Need to Beat The
Market and Build Personal Wealth)

Dear Investor,

In the next few weeks, BusinessWeek Investor Workshops
will be conducting a FREE Investing Education seminar
in your area.

In this free 90-minute seminar, you'll learn powerful
investing strategies that every investor needs to capitalize
on their investing. You'll learn how to use information,
tools and smart strategies to build wealth in the stock
market -- even in volatile times like today.

To meet the high demand for this free seminar, we
have scheduled the event in various locations in your
area. Seating is limited at each location, and the event
will fill up quickly, so we recommend you claim your FREE
tickets within the next 48 hours to assure your seat.

==========================================================
Click below to select a location close to you, and reserve
your FREE seats for this exciting event:

http://chtah.com/a/tA7$YmMAEcxF0AHxKwTAEi7oq.AFjAb7DT/invh1

Or, to reserve your seat via phone, call:

1-800-806-3278
==========================================================

About Your FREE Seminar:

History has shown that 85% of money managers don't beat
the S&P 500 (their benchmark for success). So why blindly
follow an investment "guru", or buy from a list of "Hot"
stock picks from someone you've never heard of, when you
can get the KNOWLEDGE and INFORMATION you need to make
your OWN investment decisions and TAKE CONTROL of your
investing.

During the FREE 90-minute seminar, you'll review the
information needed to understand the inner workings of
Wall Street and effectively manage your investments. No
get-rick quick techniques, just smart and practical
methods to help you manage your money:

* You'll learn how to research INFORMATION so it takes as
  little time as possible to do the maximum research.

* You'll access powerful web-based investment TOOLS to find
  investments that are appropriate for your own personal
  objectives and your own personal tolerance for risk.

* You'll uncover new STRATEGIES to make better investment
  decisions, and avoid the most common investing mistakes.

With BusinessWeek Investor Workshops' simple 5-STEP INVESTING
FORMULA, you'll see how to invest responsibly and build
up your portfolio for early retirement.

You'll learn:

* How to properly SEARCH for an investment
* How to NARROW stocks to find the best of the best
* How to use a combination of technical analysis and
  indicators to TIME your entry
* How to determine exactly when to GET OUT
* How to MONITOR your portfolio and stay on top of your
  investments

You'll also learn about 7 CASH FLOW INVESTING STRATEGIES;
alternate investing methods to help you supercharge
your portfolio:

1. Why index shares are making index mutual funds obsolete
2. How to generate monthly income using covered calls
3. Using Options to make big profits with limited risk
4. Profiting from market trends
5. How to capitalize on the emotions of a stock split
6. Using LEAPS as a low-cost substitute for stocks
7. Enhancing income potential from your LEAPS portfolio

Investors nation-wide have attended this free seminar, and
seating at these events is limited. If you'd like to attend,
claim your two free tickets today.

==========================================================
Plus: Get 2 FREE Gifts for Registering Online Today:
==========================================================

When you register online, you'll get a copy of BusinessWeek
and Standard & Poor's "Inside Wall Street: Investing for
Success", a complete guide to investing in stocks, bonds, and
mutual funds. With over 70 pages of concise commentary and
information, this guide gives you the essentials to
understanding Wall Street direct from the experts who have
been setting standards for market performance for over
100 years.

As an added bonus, you'll also get a FREE two-month
subscription to BusinessWeek Magazine and BusinessWeek
Online, your source for feature articles, headline news,
key market updates and business analysis from around
the world.

These FREE gifts are only available when you register in
advance, while seats are still available.

So take control of your investing. Click the link below to
reserve your seats to this FREE 90-minute investing
seminar.

(But hurry, seating at the location is limited, and the
event will fill up quickly.)

==========================================================
To claim your free tickets, and reserve your seats for
this exciting event, click the following link:

http://chtah.com/a/tA7$YmMAEcxF0AHxKwTAEi7oq.AFjAb7DT/invh1

Or, to reserve your seat via phone, call:

1-800-806-3278

==========================================================

We'll see you at the seminar!

Sincerely,

BusinessWeek Investor Workshops

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(c) 2001 McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This service is powered by oneFN on behalf of ThomsonFN.
OneFN Privacy
Click here to see the oneFN Privacy Policy:
http://chtah.com/a/tA7$YmMAEcxF0AHxKwTAEi7oq.AFjAb7DT/invh2

"Note:  ThomsonFN does not produce or endorse this product,
and assumes no responsibility for the use thereof."


Post Date: November 14, 2000
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-164 Available/ Potentially Avail Firm

Notice Text:
All Shippers Notification:? 01-164??? Dated : November 14, 2000

To:???? ??????? All Shippers

Subject: ?????? NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S
???????? ?????? ?? NOTICE OF AVAILABLE AND POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE
??????? ??????? FIRM TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY1)

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????????????????????????????????????????? Total???
Available
Pkg? Receipt Point2)????????? Delivery Point2)??????????????? Dth/d?????
Date3)??

A??? Sumas??????????????? Puget(Canyon)???????????????????????????? 21,000??
NOW

B??? Sumas??????????????? Puget(Canyon)?????????????????????????????? 7,000??
12/01/00 9)

C??? Sumas?????????????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.? ? 9,772?? 02/01/01 10)

D??? Sumas(1160)????????? Kemmerer??? ? ??????? ? 2,750?? 12/01/00 9)
???? Ignacio Plant(1590)

E??? Sumas(2,390)???????? Monticello(330)???????????????????????????? 6,016??
12/01/00 9)
???? Ignacio(3,626)????????? Rio Algom(300)
??????????????????????????????????????? Moab#2(1,861)
??????????????????????????????????????? Moab(2,283)
??????????????????????????????????????? Arches National Park(17)
??????????????????????????????????????? Vernal(653)
??????????????????????????????????????? Dutch John(125)
??????????????????????????????????????? Redwash(447)

**********************************************************************
Jackson Prairie Receipt Point Capacity
Available for TF-1 or TF-2 Service as specified below

F??? Jackson Prairie??????
SIPI????????????????????????????????????????????????? 47,341?? NOW 5)8)
???? (55,715)??????????????????????
Lynden??????????????????????????????????????????????? 592?????
?????????????????????????????????????????
Lawrence??????????????????????????????????????????? 81??????
?????????????????????????????????????????
ACME?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 68??????
?????????????????????????????????????????? Mt.
Vernon??????????????????????????????????????? 115?????
???????????????????????????????????????????
Sedro/Woolley???????????????????????????????? 3,988???
??????????????????????????????????????????? LDS
Church?????????????????????????????????????? 133?????
??????????????????????????????????????????? Granite
Falls????????????????????????????????????? 1,536???
???????????????????????????????????????????
Machias????????????????????????????????????????????? 1,840???
???????????????????????????????????????????
Snohomish???????????????????????????????????????? 21??????

G??? Jackson Prair?? ie????? Echo
Lake??????????????????????????????????????????? 33?????? NOW 5)8)
???? (7,530)?????????????????????????? Duval/Cottage
Lake????????????????????????? 183????
???????????????????????????????????????????
Redmond?????????????????????????????????????????? 3,293??
?????????????????????????????????????????? May
Valley?????????????????????????????????????????? 300????
??????????????????????????????????????????? Lake
Francis????????????????????????????????????? 2,808??
???????????????????????????????????????????
Covington?????????????????????????????????????????? 263????
??????????????????????????????????????????? Black
Diamond????????????????????????????????? 450????
???????????????????????????????????????????
Enumclaw?????????????????????????????????????????? 200????

H??? Jackson Prairie????? Sedro/Woolley???????????????????????????????????
8,300??? 05/01/01 5)10)

I??? Jackson Prairie?????? South Lake???????????????????????????????????????
35,500?? NOW 6)
??
J??? Jackson Prairie?????? Idaho State Pen.??????????????????????????????
1,735??? NOW 6)

K??? Jackson Prairie????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.????????????????? 98,069?? NOW
6)

L??? Jackson Prairie????? Shute Creek????????????????????????????????????
7,688??? NOW 6)

M?? Jackson Prairie????? Pocatello??????????????????????????????????????????
1,198??? NOW 6)

N??? Starr Road?????????????? Inland
Paper????????????????????????????????????? 830????? NOW 8)

O??? Stanfield?????????????????
Stanfield??????????????????????????????????????????? 3,681??? 12/01/00 9)

P??? Stanfield??????????????????
Stanfield????????????????????????????????????????? 14,490?? 04/01/02 10)

Q??? Shute Creek?????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)???????????????? 25,000?? NOW

R??? Shute Creek????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)?????????????????? 35,000
12/01/00 9)

S??? Shute Creek????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)??????????????????? 15,000??
11/01/01 9)

T??? Opal Plant????????????? Western Mkt Center??????????????????????
90,000?? 04/01/01 9)

U??? Painter??????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)???????????????????????
5,000??? NOW 8)

V??? Painter?????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)???????????????????????
3,351??? NOW 8)

W??? Painter????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)?????????????????????
35,000?? 12/01/00 9)

X??? Western Mkt Center?? Crossover 16-Questar?????????? 30,415?? 12/01/00 7)
9)

Y??? Western Mkt Center?? Crossover 16-Questar?????????? 20,000?? 12/01/00 7)
9)

Z??? Western Mkt Center?? Clay Basin?????????????????????????????????
4,585??? NOW 7) 8)

AA?? Crossover 16???????? Green River-CIG????????????????????????? 23,152??
NOW 7) 8)

BB?? Crossover 16???????? Clay Basin????????????????????????????????????
27,263?? NOW 7) 8)

CC?? Green Rvr/McKinn-CIG Clay Basin????????????????????????????? 23,152??
NOW 7) 8)

DD?? Clay Basin?????????? Chevron Rangely(6093)???????????????????? 7,488???
03/01/01 9)
???????????????????????????????????? Vernal (1395)

EE?? Clay Basin?????????? Redwash/Questar????????????????????????????
19,240?? 03/01/01 7) 9)

FF?? Clay Basin??????????
Rifle????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 7,770??? NOW 7) 8)

GG?? Clay Basin??????????
Rifle??????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1,850??? NOW 7) 8)

HH?? Clay Basin?????????? American Soda Ash??????????????????????? 1,140???
NOW 7) 8)

II?? Redwash/Chevron????? Green River-CIG??????????????????????? 1,850??? NOW
8)

JJ?? Redwash/QPC????????? Rifle??????????????????????????????????????????????
1,050??? NOW 7) 8)
????
KK??? Greasewood?????????? Clay Basin??????????????????????????????????
2,765??? NOW 8)

LL?? Barrett????????????? Kern
River???????????????????????????????????????????? 4,097??? 03/01/01 9)
?
MM?? Barrett????????????? Green River-CIG??????????????????????????????
6,460??? NOW 8)

NN?? Sand Springs???????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)????????????? 23,148??
12/01/00-
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 03/31/01 4)

OO?? Sand Springs???????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)????????????? 23,148??
11/01/01 4,10)

PP?? West Douglas???????? Clay Basin????????????????????????????????????
2,354??? NOW 8)

Q Q?? Calf Canyon(410)???? Kern River??????????????????????????????????
703????? 12/01/00 9)
???? Foundation Crk.(293)

RR?? Ignacio Plant??????? Green River-CIG??????????????????????????????
5,000??? 12/01/00 9)

SS?? Ignacio Plant??????? Green River-CIG???????????????????????????????
1,424??? NOW 8)

TT?? Ignacio Plant??????? Grand Junction?????????????????????????????????
4,000??? 12/01/00 9)

UU?? Ignacio Plant??????? Grand Junction??????????????????????????????????
4,310??? NOW 8)

VV?? Ignacio Plant??????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG)?????????????????? 25,000??
NOW 8)

WW?? Ignacio Plant??????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG)??????????????????? 15,000??
NOW 8)

XX?? Ignacio Plant??????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG)??????????????????????
10,000?? NOW 8)

YY?? Blanco Hub-TW??????? Green River-CIG???????????????????????????????
20,000?? 12/01/00 9)

ZZ?? Blanco Hub-TW??????? Green River-CIG?????????????????????????????????
30,000?? NOW 8)

************************************************************************

1) This notification supercedes all previous Notices of Available and?
??? Potentially Available Capacity and is subject to change at any time.

2) Other receipt and delivery points utilizing the described
??? transportation corridor may be available.

3)? Potential Availability date for the Capacity.

4)? Contracts shall include the following subordinate scheduling
??? provision if the requested term extends into a critical operational
??? period:

To the extent Shipper's nominated volumes are not scheduled solely
due to Shipper's subordinate scheduling priorities set forth below,
the monthly base reservation charge will be discounted to $0.00 per
Dth for that quantity only.

Section 14.1(c)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights through any mainline constraint
from the Sand Springs receipt point to the Ignacio Bondad (or
LaPlata-TW) delivery point(s) to have a scheduling priority which
will be subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm shipper
with primary corridor rights that encompass and extend beyond the

5)Available for TF-1 or TF-2 transportation service.? TF-2 service?
??????? will not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed
??????? ratefor TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked
??????? to requester's designated storage contract or storage
??????? ownership right. TF-2 service shall include the following
??????? subordinate scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any northflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

6)??? Available for TF-2 transportation service only. TF-2 service will
??????? not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate for
??????? TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to???????
??????? requester's designated storage contract or storage ownership?????
??????? right.? TF-2 service shall include the following subordinate??
??????? scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any southflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

7)??? Capacity is not to exceed a one month primary term with evergreen
??????? language.? Any offers with terms greater than one month will need to
??????? be evaluated for possible seasonal flow conditions that may restrict
??????? the available capacity beyond a one month term.

8)??? This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
??????? This capacity can be made available by providing one business day
??????? written termination notification to the current holder of the?
??????? capacity.

9)??? This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
10) This capacity can be made available by providing ten business
??????? days written termination notification to the current holder of
??????? the capacity.

11) This capacity is currently under contract and does not contain an???
evergreen clause.

12) This capacity is "mitigated" capacity and will not contain an???????
evergreen clause.

13) This capacity is available only for the term offered.? No evergreen???
clause available.?

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING AVAILABLE AND
POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE
TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

To request Potentially Available Transportation Capacity available on
the first day of December 2000, Shipper must submit a Prearranged Offer
in the form of the Letter Agreement provided below.? This Letter
Agreement must be received by Northwest no later than 2:00 pm Central
Time on November 14, 2000.? Northwest will accept or reject the
Prearranged Offer by no later than the end of of the gas day on November
14, 2000. If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable, Northwest will provide
a 10-day termination notice to the current holder of the Capacity, post
the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no later than two
business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise specified in
this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the
procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff.

To request the Potentially Available Transportation Capacity with the?
one business day termination provisions as indicated by footnote "8)",?
Shipper must submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter
Agreement provided below.? Upon receipt of this Letter Agreement
Northwest will either accept or reject the Prearranged Offer within 24-
hours. If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable, Northwest will provide
the one business day termination notice to the current holder of the
Capacity, post the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no
later than two business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise
specified in this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant
to the procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff.

To request Available Transportation Capacity, Shipper must immediately
submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter Agreement provided
below.? Northwest will accept or reject the Prearranged Offer within two
(2) business days of receipt of the prearranged offer.? If the
Prearranged Offer is acceptable, Northwest will post the Prearranged
Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no later than two business days
after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise specified in this posting,
bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the procedure set forth
in Northwest's tariff. Northwest has the right to re-post Available
capacity for bid with or without prearranged offers.

??????? _________________(Date)

____________________________ (Company Name)>
____________________________ (Company Address)
____________________________ (City, State, Zip)

VIA FACSIMILE - (801) 584-7076

Northwest Pipeline Corporation
c/o Williams Gas Pipelines - West
Attn: Candace C.? Karpakis
295 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84158

Re:???? Prearranged Offer for Available or Potentially Available
Transportation Capacity on Williams' Northwest Pipeline Transmission System

Dear Candace:

_______________________ ("Shipper") submits the following bid for
available or potentially available transportation capacity ("Capacity")
designated as package _____ on Northwest Pipeline Corporation's
("Northwest") "Notice of Available or Potentially Available Firm
Transportation Capacity" dated November 14, 2000.?? Shipper recognizes and
agrees that the Capacity will be subject to the Special Conditions set
forth in this posting.? Shipper's request? is?? or?? is not?? (circle one)
contingent upon confirmation that its offered discount rate provides use
of receipt/delivery points outside the receipt/delivery point corridor
specified in the package.? If maximum rate is offered, this provision does
not apply.? Shipper understands that its prearranged offer is subject to
the Special Conditions described below.

Shipper understands that Northwest will post the prearranged details of
?this offer for such Capacity for bidding and Shipper will have the right
to match the highest bid value upon close of the bid process.? Northwest
will not disclose the identity of the prearranged bidder in such posting.

Service Type:?????????? TF-1 Large Customer

Contract Demand(Dth/d): ____________________

Receipt Point(s)(if other than those posted for the designated package of
capacity)????????????????????????? ____________________
Delivery Point(s)(if other than those posted for the designated package of
capacity)??????????????????????????????? ____________________
Daily Reservation Rate: $_______/Dth? (applicable surcharges, volumetric
?charge & fuel are additive)

Term:______________________________to___________________________________

Evergreen Requested (circle one):?????? Yes?? or???? No

Identity of any affiliate of Northwest involved in Shipper's transaction:
Indicate "None" or "Name the Affiliate":?
_________________________________________________

Northwest's acceptance of Shipper's prearranged offer for the Capacity
will constitute a binding agreement between Northwest and Shipper.?
Shipper shall be awarded the Capacity at the terms agreed upon in this
Letter Agreement if no bids are received with a greater economic value for
such Capacity during the bid process. If Shipper elects to match a bid
with a greater economic value, it shall be awarded the Capacity according
to the terms of the matched bid. Shipper agrees to electronically execute
a service agreement on Northwest's Electronic Bulletin Board which
confirms the terms of the final accepted transaction.

If you have questions or comments regarding the above referenced
information, please contact __________________________ at
______________________(Phone Number) ______________________(Fax Number).

Sincerely,

______________________________???????????????? (Name)
______________________________???????????????? (Title)

(Accepted? /? Rejected) by Northwest:

Date: _______________?? Name: ________________________________

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(For Prearranged Offer Agreement)

If the prearranged offer for the Capacity is accepted at a discount rate
which provides for the use of receipt/delivery points outside the
specified receipt/delivery point corridor for the Capacity, the accepted
prearranged offered discount rate shall apply no matter which receipt and
delivery points are utilized by Shipper, or any temporary replacement
Shipper, under capacity release transactions, including segmented
releases.? If the accepted prearranged offered discount rate for the
Capacity does not provide for use of receipt/delivery points outside the
specified receipt/delivery point corridor for the Capacity, the accepted
prearranged offered discount rate shall apply to Shipper, or any temporary
replacement Shipper, only to the extent that both Shipper and any
temporary replacement Shipper utilize receipt points within their
respective primary firm receipt/delivery point to primary firm delivery
point corridors, otherwise, Shipper will be liable for Northwest's maximum
tariff rates.

If you are interested in discussing any of the Available or Potentially
Available Capacity, please call Candace Karpakis at (801) 584-6996 (work)
or at (801) 971-5983 (cellular).

Word:? F:\NWP Capacity Postings\2000 All Shipper Notices\01-164 11-14-2000
WGP-W
Dap/cc

?


Hi, Robbi!

Can you give me a call?  853-3907.

thanks!

Marie


Please see attached.
Regards,
Jim


To All:

This is in response to the article in Gas Daily last week that mentioned the
need for a short term working capital loan from the City of Philadelphia to
cover their cash crunch due to higher natural gas prices.  Veronica and I
spoke today to Tom Smyth, Controller of Philadelphia Gas Works, to understand
this situation and gain comfort in their current credit situation.  Tom
confirmed that a rate hike has been proposed to cover the increase gas costs
associated with current market conditions.  Their last rate hike was in 1992,
at a time when natural gas prices were in a more stable environment.  He
reiterated that this rate hike will alleviate the cash crunch that the entity
has experienced and will provide enough cash flow to operate in this
environment.   Further confidence in the stability of Phil Gas Works is
derived from the fact that the entity is a political sub-division of the City
of Philadelphia and is the only gas supplier to residents and businesses in
the city.  Currently ENA is selling between 10,000-15,000 mmbtu/d to the
counterparty incurring a 30-day receivable risk of $1.5 to $2.3MM, which is
under their current credit limit.

Regards,
Russell


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
03:05 PM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 01/16/2001 01:36:51 PM
To: "Oncale Z (Zach)" <ZONCALE@equiva.com>, "Vignes AB (Andrew)"
<ABVignes@equiva.com>, "LeBlanc K (Keith)" <KLeBlanc@equiva.com>,
"'Chad.Landry@enron.com'" <Chad.Landry@enron.com>, Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Monceaux [mailto:jmonceau@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Alli Reviere; Brian Reeves; candepea@hotmail.com;
Cynthia.L.Paschall@m1.irs.gov; jessica daquilla; gavin schwing; jeanne
Fontenot; jennifer danna; Jonas Beatty; Mitch Andrus; melanie stover;
Mitch Work; nat (work); nat monceaux; Shawn & Ali; paula tregre
Subject: Fw: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

----- Original Message -----
From: <mdaville@prhc.net>
To: <smire@akool.com>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Fw: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Monica Daville/Eunice/phccorp on
01/12/2001 02:40 PM ---------------------------

Dolly Moreau
01/12/2001 02:29 PM

To:   Amy M Fremin/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Arlene
      Chachere/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Beverly L
      Rozas/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Carla R
      Fontenot/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Christine
      Sonnier/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Connie R
      Joseph/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Dale Semar/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Debbie Langley/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Debbie
      LeJeune/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Delores LeDay/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Denel LaFleur/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Diana H
      Heinen/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Dolly Moreau/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Doris Brown/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, James
      Manuel/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp, Jana
      Reviere/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Jean
      Higginbotham/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, L. D.
      Savoy/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Lanell
      Landreneau/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Larry
      Walker/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Liz Lowe/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Lynn
      Pavich/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Marcella R.
      Prejean/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Mary Fontenot/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Melissa L Buller/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Michelle
      Fruge/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Missy Joubert/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Monica Daville/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Nick
      Pavich/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Pat Aguillard/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Rhonda Medlin/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Roddy
      Hebert/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Ruth Evans/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Sandra J Colligan/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Shane
      Fontenot/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Shannon D'
      Aubin/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Theresa Veillon/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp,
      Toby Savoy/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Tony
      Johnson/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp
cc:

Subject:  Fw: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Dolly Moreau/Eunice/phccorp on
01/12/2001 02:14 PM ---------------------------

Peggy J. Morgan
01/12/2001 09:37 AM

To:   Jackie L. Verrette/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp,
      dmorgan@rev.state.la.us, beaniebabe599@cs.com, dmichele01@aol.com,
      agaudet@iberiamedicalcenter.com, rcchase@vvm.com, Dolly
      Moreau/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Marcella R.
      Prejean/Eunice/phccorp@phccorp, Catherine M.
      Gallien/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp, Ann
      Hume/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp, Barbara L.
      Quattlebaum/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp, Renee
      Thibodeaux/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp, Chris
      Simon/Opelousas/phccorp@phccorp
cc:

Subject:  Fw: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

----- Forwarded by Peggy J. Morgan/phccorp on 01/12/01 09:34 AM -----

                    Pat Walls
                                        To:
                    01/12/01            cc:
                    09:11 AM            Subject:

----- Forwarded by Pat Walls/phccorp on 01/12/01 09:08 AM -----

                    Trula Saeger
                                        To:

                    01/12/01            cc:
                    09:02 AM            Subject:

----- Forwarded by Trula Saeger/phccorp on 01/12/01 08:59 AM -----

                    Sue Wiley
                                        To:
                    01/12/01            cc:
                    08:53 AM            Subject:

----- Forwarded by Sue Wiley/phccorp on 01/12/01 08:52 AM -----

                    "Delores
                    Gilreath"           To:
                    <kdcg@earthli       cc:
                    nk.net>             Subject:

                    01/11/01
                    03:29 PM

----- Original Message -----
From: Janet Theado <jtheado@integragrp.com>
To: 'Barbara Theado' <BATDRT@cs.com>; 'Delores Gilreath'
<kdcg@earthlink.net>; 'Douglas Campbell' <wdc341@msn.com>; 'Jan Bennett'
<Jan_Bennett@cgha.com>; 'Kathy Olberding' <Kato2265@aol.com>; 'Martha
Crisp'
<m_crisp@compaq.net>; 'Michael Crisp' <mccrisp@surfsouth.com>; 'Sherry
Crisp' <astrofl@bellsouth.net>; 'Tricia Baker' <Trixilea@cinci.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject: FW: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

> > > >> > > > > This Is Scary!!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > The Phone Will Ring Right After You Do This. . .
> > > >> > > > > Just read the little stories and make a wish.
> > > >> > > > > Scroll all the way to the bottom and there is alittle
message
> > > >> > > > re    -then
> > > >> > > > > do
> > > >> > > > > it.  No attachment on this one.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I'm 13 years old, and I wished that my dad would come home
> > from
> > > >>the
> > > >> > > > army,
> > > >> > > > > because he'd been having problems with his heart and right
> > leg.
> > It
> > > >>was
> > > >> > > > > 2:53
> > > >> > > > > p.m. that I'd made the wish. At 3:07 p.m. (14 minutes
later),
> > the
> > > >> > > > doorbell
> > > >> > > > > rang, and there he was, luggage and all!!
> > > >> > > > > Katie
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I'm 20 and I've been having trouble in my job and on the
> > verge
> > of
> > > >> > > > > quitting.
> > > >> > > > > I made a simple wish that my boss would get a new job.
That
> > was
> > a
> > > >>1:35
> > > >> > > > and
> > > >> > > > > at 2:55 there was an announcement that he was promoted.
> > > >> > > > > Lisa
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Believe me... this really works!! Just scroll down to the
> > end,
> > but
> > > >> > > > while
> > > >> > > > > you
> > > >> > > > > do, make a wish. Whatever age you are, is the number of
> > minutes
> > it
> > > >> > > > will
> > > >> > > > > take
> > > >> > > > > for your wish to come true (ex. you are 15 years old, it
will
> > take
> > > >>15
> > > >> > > > > minutes for your wish to come true).
> > > >> > > > > Go!!!!!!
> > > >> > > > > *
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > *
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > *
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************************
> > > >> > > > > **********************************
> > > >> > > > > *********************************
> > > >> > > > > ********************************
> > > >> > > > > *******************************
> > > >> > > > > ******************************
> > > >> > > > > *****************************
> > > >> > > > > ****************************
> > > >> > > > > ***************************
> > > >> > > > > **************************
> > > >> > > > > *************************
> > > >> > > > > ************************
> > > >> > > > > ***********************
> > > >> > > > > **********************
> > > >> > > > > *********************
> > > >> > > > > ********************
> > > >> > > > > *******************
> > > >> > > > > ******************
> > > >> > > > > *****************
> > > >> > > > > ****************
> > > >> > > > > ***************
> > > >> > > > > **************
> > > >> > > > > *************
> > > >> > > > > ************
> > > >> > > > > ***********
> > > >> > > > > **********
> > > >> > > > > *********
> > > >> > > > > ********
> > > >> > > > > *******
> > > >> > > > > ******
> > > >> > > > > *****
> > > >> > > > > ****
> > > >> > > > > ***
> > > >> > > > > **
> > > >> > > > > *
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > STOP!!!!!!!!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Your wish will now come true in your age minutes!!
> > > >> > > > > Now follow this carefully.... it can be very rewarding!!!!
> > If
> > you
> > > >> > > > > send this  to 10 more people, other than the 5 that you
> > already
> > > >>have
> > > >> > > > to
> > > >> > > > > send
> > > >> > > > > to, something major that you*ve been wanting will happen.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>_________________________________________________________________________
> > > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > >
> > > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > > >http://profiles.msn.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Katalin,

Please send me your address etc.,  and I will forward a copy of the agreement.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


fyi.  michelle

----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 02:27 PM -----

	Gene Diers@ENRON
	06/09/2000 07:54 AM

		 To: Gary Buck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom O
Moore/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Carmen Ayala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Holsworth/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT, AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT SERVICES, PROJECT
WORK DESCRIPTIONS (LONG AND SHORT FORM)

I talked briefly to Carmen this morning about plans to revise the above
agreements and associated arrangements for processing them. ]

Since I am retiring on June 30, 2000, I have no territorial interest in what
happens but I think I would be remiss if I didn't at least offer a couple of
comments:

1.  Taking the agreements in the name of Enron Corp. while irksome to some
has been effective.  It allows any/all commercial companies to reference an
agreement.  This provides for consistency not only in the manner in which
vendors treat different operating companies but also in the manner in which
we treat different vendors.  I think it keeps vendors from employing a divide
and conquer approach.

2.  The agreements need to be updated.  I know that there are some reasons
for using two agreements, i.e., MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT and AGREEMENT FOR
PROJECT SERVICES, but I would vote for combining them if the problems could
be worked out.  It's not that the current agreements are bad but there is
some duplication, terms that are confusing, clauses that are missing, etc.,
all things that could be fixed rather easily.

3.   I don't see why the agreements couldn't be generalized somewhat to cover
all kinds of professional services as opposed to just IT consulting.

4.  If commercial companies need/want to sign PWD's, why can't we work out an
arrangement wherein the PWD is still subject to a Corporate master agreement
but the commercial company signs and indemnifies the corporation, e.g., for
anything that they might do on the PWD.

I realize that nobody has asked me and maybe I don't really understand what
it is that you are trying to accomplish in the modified processbut as I view
it with from an overall Enron Corp., I am concerned that we might be chunking
a methodology that has served us.

Thanks.  gene


-----Original Message-----
From: 	mailings@smartmoneylist.com (SmartMoney.com Mailings)@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	SmartMoney.com Please Reply *770545&BED668916B*

Welcome to the SmartMoney family!

To complete your registration and/or mailing list sign-up,
we need to verify your e-mail address.  Should anything
change with your account or service, we will use this
email address to contact you.

Please reply to this message to verify your email address
is cooper.richey@enron.com.

Simply click the reply button (or use the Message menu and
select reply) in your email program and click send.

Thanks again!


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
11:18 AM ---------------------------

Energy Info Source <custsvc@energyinfosource.com> on 11/17/2000 11:57:25 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: Distributed Generation Update

Energy Info Source is privileged to make available to you a free sample
issue of its Bi-weekly Distributed Generation Update Report.  This report
contains the latest news on fuels cells, microturbines, wind, and solar
provided in PDF format delivered to you via email every other week all
for only $75/year for an individual subscription (corporate subscriptions
for multiple users are available for $200/year).

Check it out and if you'd like to subscribe, click on the following link
to order online or call us at 888-986-2250 (303-986-7449 if in Canada)
to order by phone.  We accept Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.

http://www.energyinfosource.com/rapid/report_generation.cfm#subscribe

Viewing the report requires Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher, available
free at:

http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

----------------------
If you want to be taken off our mailing list or for more information:

Energy Info Source, Inc.
email: custsvc@energyinfosource.com
phone: 888-986-2250

 - DistGen09_24.pdf


I am no longer at Enron and am available at sanjaybhatnagar00@yahoo.com. My
US mobile after 15th March will be 832-368-4164 and my mobile in India is
91-98102-67215 when I am in India.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Phase IV and V Expansion EB39C1

Date:		4/25/2001
Time:		2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020520.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


This is the Los Angeles Times article Mark has been working on...

California; Metro Desk
Electricity Cost Data Spread the Blame Power: Many suppliers charged more
than the firms that Davis has pilloried, records show.
RICH CONNELL; ROBERT J. LOPEZ; DOUG SMITH
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

07/10/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
B-1
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company

SACRAMENTO -- California's energy meltdown involves a far more diverse group
of wholesale electricity merchants than suggested by Gov. Gray Davis, who has
aggressively blamed a handful of Texas companies, state records show.
During the first three months of this year--one of the worst stretches of
power shortages during the crisis--an assortment of public and private
entities charged the state prices averaging well above some of those paid to
Texas firms, according to documents released to The Times on Monday by the
Department of Water Resources, which now buys power for California.
Among those setting and collecting some of the highest average prices per
megawatt-hour were a Canadian public utility, a subsidiary of San Diego Gas &
Electric's parent company, and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power,
the report shows. Their average prices ranged from $498 a megawatt-hour
charged by Powerex, the trading arm of British Columbia's BC Hydro, to $292
an hour by the DWP.
In fact, some of the biggest private power companies singled out for
criticism by Davis and other state officials--Dynegy Inc., Duke Energy and
Mirant--charged less than the average prices the state paid for the period.
Those companies' average prices ranged from $146 to $240 per megawatt-hour,
according to an analysis of the documents.
The figures cover the various types of spot and longer-term power purchased
by the state during three months that included rolling blackouts and more
than a month of razor-thin reserves, leading to continuous power emergencies.
Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the governor has directed his sharpest
barbs at private out-of-state generators because, in general, they have
reaped the highest profits over the longest period.
"You have to look at the whole picture," Maviglio said.
"The governor was expressing his displeasure with the arrogance of the
generators who wear cowboy hats," he said. "Their profits were 100% to 400%
above last year. . . . Just because there are other entities who are charging
us more [per megawatt-hour] doesn't change the fact that we are getting
ripped off by companies from Houston, Tulsa, Atlanta or Charlotte."
The report by the Department of Water Resources was provided to The Times on
the same day the state released 1,700 pages of documents on California's
electricity purchases on the volatile spot market for the year's first
quarter.
The records detail how the state spent nearly $8 billion buying power in the
first five months of the year, and underscore the complexity of the state's
energy problem. They also show that patterns of high prices are not limited
to a few generators.
Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the water resources agency, said that the
reports together show that prices were extremely volatile early in the year.
"All the prices were high," he said, noting the downward trend in costs since
his agency began buying power in mid-January.
The average price per megawatt-hour for all state purchases went from $316 in
January to $243 in May. Spot prices fell from an average of $321 per hour to
$271, the reports show.
In the first quarter of the year, some public entities' prices far exceeded
those of the biggest private companies. For example, Houston-based Enron, one
of the nation's biggest power traders, charged an average of $181 per
megawatt-hour. And Atlanta-based Mirant, which sold the most to the state, a
total of $706 million, charged an average of $225 per megawatt-hour.
By contrast, a Calgary, Canada, firm, TransAlta Energy, averaged $335 a
megawatt-hour, and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District had average
charges of $330 per megawatt-hour.
A spokesman for Enron, Mark Palmer, said recently that the "vilification of
Enron was based on politics, not facts." Spokesmen for BC Hydro could not be
reached late Monday to comment on its huge sales to the state. In the past,
the utility has defended its pricing practices, saying it has offered
last-minute hydroelectric power that helped keep California's lights on.
A spokeswoman for Sempra, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric,
said late Monday the company was unable to comment because it had yet to see
the figures released by the state. Officials at DWP, who could not be reached
Monday evening, have defended their pricing, saying the costs of producing
the power needed by the state were extremely high.
More Power Bought Than Projected
Hidalgo, of the Department of Water Resources, said his agency's efforts,
coupled with conservation by business and consumers and falling natural gas
prices, have begun to tame the state's market.
Still, the state had to purchase $321 million in power in April and May,
about 10% more than Davis' analysts had projected.
Hidlago said that was because of hot weather in May and other supply problems
in April. He said reports will show that power purchases fell short of state
projections in June and early July.
The reports also will show that prices paid by the state were down in June
and July, partly because spot prices have fallen sharply, often to well under
$100 a megawatt-hour.
A summary Department of Water Resources report released Monday credited
Davis' program of nurturing new power generation and establishing long-term
power contracts with with "moving the California electric energy industry
closer to normalcy."

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 12:46 PM -----

	Bill Windle@ENRON
	06/05/2000 09:39 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savitabi@llgm.com, Sbehrend@llgm.com, Jmcgreevy@llgm.com,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gaurav Babbar/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: policy

Attached is a clean copy of the ACE USA draft policy.

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Windle/Corp/Enron on 06/05/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

"Hoog, David T TL16" <David.Hoog@ACE-INA.com> on 06/02/2000 06:08:37 PM
To: "'Bill.Windle@enron.com'" <Bill.Windle@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: policy

see if this works. <<EnronPolicy.doc>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill.Windle@enron.com [SMTP:Bill.Windle@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 5:12 PM
> To: Hoog, David T TL16
> Cc: dhoog@att.net; Carol.St.Clair@enron.com; Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com;
> Leslie.Hansen@enron.com; Gaurav.Babbar@enron.com; Savitabi@llgm.com;
> jmcgreevy@llgm.com; sbehrend@llgm.com
> Subject: Re: policy
>
>
> David,
>
> Unfortunately we were unable to accept all changes. Would you please
> forward a clean copy of the draft policy to those listed above (cc).
> Thanks.
>

 - EnronPolicy.doc


This link should work - I sent it to myself and tested it.  This will take
you straight to the page on the DPUC website where the document is posted.
The first document is the draft decision; the second is the notice of written
exceptions.  Let me know if you need anything further.

Thanks.

Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191

----- Forwarded by Margo Reyna/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 05:25 PM -----

	Margo Reyna
	12/07/2000 05:25 PM

		 To: Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

http://www.dpuc.state.ct.us/DOCKCURR.NSF/f5c4efacb773316a8525664e0049ea32/bac9
4d9333de97a1852569ac006a1532?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,Lightrade

Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191


Would you send me an Oglethorpe invoice for Feb please?


I saved the file for us to send to Susan Trevino for all the book access requests.  I added the control group and put goss, kam, valdes and his people in there.  So make sure you add that group to your book requests.  Please take a look at this file and let me know if we need to make any changes.  I plan on sending this file to Susan Trevino by tomorrow afternoon.  The file in located in the Netco directory under controls/desk matrix.  Thanks.
PL


Forgive the length, but it was a long couple of days.  Apologies in advance,
since I'm sure I've missed something.  Hopefully, it hits the highlights and
gives a good flavor.  Please foreward to anyone I've inadvertently missed.
Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Best,
Jeff


Hi Felicia,

I would like to have one (1) AMEX gift certificate for $50.00 processed as
soon as possible.

Thanks,
Rod


Thanks to the DC team - Well Done!

	Chris Long@ENRON
	07/27/2000 04:34 PM

		 To: raislerk@sullcrom.com, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Stopped anti-energy amendment!!!

Today we were successful in killing an amendment that was offered by Rep.
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) in the House Banking Committee during its markup of
the Commodities Future Modernization Act of 2000.  This amendment would have
stricken language that provided an exclusion from CFTC jurisdiction for all
non-agriculture transactions (energy, metals, broadband).  The amendment
failed, largely due to pressure from Enron, by a vote of 20-12.  Rep. Ken
Bensten (D-TX) joined Chairman Leach in speaking against the amendment.

In more positive movement, yesterday the House Commerce Committee passed its
version on the bill including a provision that exempts metal trading
multilateral trading facilities from CFTC jurisdiction.

Congress goes into recess tomorrow and we will have a better sense on how the
Rules Committee plans to reconcile differences between the versions of the
bill later this week.  The Senate is still the unknown.

Call me at any question - Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000 05:28
PM ---------------------------

Chris Long
07/26/2000 06:32 PM

To: "Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov>
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Bradley:

We have learned that two amendments will be offered tomorrow my Rep. Maloney:

#1  - Strikes lines 15-25 from page 41 and the entire page 42 (these are the
sections of HR 4541 as reported out of the Ag. Committee which address the
exemption for all most non-agriculture commodities trade on an electronic
facility.

#2  - Request a comprehensive study on the President's working group, DOE,
and FERC.

We strongly oppose amendment #1 which intends to more heavily regulate the
energy derivatives industry.  Please have Rep. Bentsen voice his opposition
to this amendment.  My guess is that amendment #2 should and will be ruled
non-germane, however this is not a compromise we would support.

Thanks - Chris
                  (202) 466-9158

"Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov> on 07/26/2000 05:31:08 PM
To: Chris.Long@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Chris, I will look this over and get back to you.

> ----------
> From:  Chris.Long@enron.com[SMTP:Chris.Long@enron.com]
> Sent:  Wednesday, July 26, 2000 5:21 PM
> To:  Edgell, Bradley
> Cc:  RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
> Subject:  CEA Hearing tomorrow
>
> <<File: CFTC.gov.doc>>
> Bradley:  The highlighted talking points could be used by Rep. Bentsen in
> response to an amendment focused on the energy derivative industry.
> Additional CFTC oversight is clearly not warranted, nor is a study needed.
> Call me with any questions at (202) 466-9158.
>
>
>
> (See attached file: CFTC.gov.doc)
>


In California, all customers can choose--large and small.  There are core (small customer) and noncore (industrial customers).  Consumption volume differentiates the two.  Noncore customes receive cheaper transporation rates.I'm not sure what sort of limitations you're specifically focused on.  There are requirements regarding storage requirements (customers must have some storage) and requirements to pay a share of past "stranded costs" caused by the move to competition.  And noncore customers on PG&E have more flexibility to buy in-state transportation than customers on SoCal have.

If there's anything else, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neal, Aida
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 6:54 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Market Characteristics

Per our conversation, I am trying to put together some data on the status of gas markets in California, Nevada, Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Oregon.  In particular I need the gas market characteristics in these states.  Are the markets open to retail competition for commercial and industrial customers and if so, what are the requirements and are there some limitations.  Please E-mail me your response as I will be in Long Beach tomorrow.

Thanks.

	Aida


Fran-

 Though this is a mess, I will attempt to explain the changes I have made (given the information that I received from Bill Williams III this morning):

   I took deal # 421598.1 from 4 to a 7 MW by adding an extra 3 MW's at a $0 price.  LP owes us $0 for the energy that was ramped down because we buy it back from them.  I added deal # 754187.1 to purchase back the 3 MW at a $0 price. I put in a $0 price because we paid LP for these 3 MW's thru annuity # 531549.1 that pays LP 70% of what we sold the 3 MW for on real time (deals # 530654.1, 530716.1 and 530689.1) Please remember these changes span 2 days: 2-23-01 and 2-24-01.

  I changed deal # 530689.1 from W Hourly book to ST NW because ST NW recognizes both purchase from PGE (529161.1) and sale to Puget (530689.1).  There is an intra-desk annuity # 531524.1 with which ST NW is compensating ST W Hourly for remarketing the power and an intra-desk deal # 531546.1 with which ST W Hourly is compensating LT NW for the basis price of $48.

  Below is a snapshot of what the deals now look like in scheduling.
  I hope this helps to explain everything.
  Please let me know if you have any questions.

  Thanks,

  Virginia

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Good morning Ms. Milligan,

Please review and submit approval to Enron Messaging Administration.  The
note will be sent this evening to the NYMEX Hedge Exemption List (this list
includes: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT Calgary,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT New York and
Everyone_in_ECT_Denver).

We are trying to get approval to send the message out ASAP as requested;
until approval is received, the message is scheduled to be distributed this
evening.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Administration

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Gwynn,

Sally wasn't quite sure what you wanted.  She put together a little something
- if you can use it fine, if not, that's fine too.

Opportunities for accounting professionals in traditional and in
non-traditional roles, such as transaction structuring, risk analysis and
commodity operations.

Patti x39106

Gwynn Gorsuch@ENRON
03/28/2001 01:56 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted C Bland/Enron@EnronXGate, Kim
Cadena/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: National Association of Black Accountants

Laura Schwartz and I are working on pulling together the article that goes
with the photo taken last week for the NABA national newsletter.  We get
approximately 550 words to tell the Enron story in anticipation of our
recruiting presence at the NABA national conference in July.  Are there any
particular messages you would like us to get out there with regard to
opportunities in EWS and EES for accountants?  Please let me know your
thoughts before the end of next week (the sooner the better - the final due
date for photo and story is April 13).

Many thanks

Gwynn Gorsuch
Enron Corp.
Workforce Diversity
713.853.7407 direct line


I will be in Phila.  Please grab materials for me.

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           12/06/2000 02:57 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Caroline
Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amanda
Huble/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PIRA World Oil Outlook Presentation

Dr. Gary Ross (PIRA CEO)  will here tomorrow to discuss the global oil
markets.

Thursday Dec 7, 2000 in room 8c1 from 3:30 to 5.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 09/27/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca> on 09/25/2000 05:53:40 PM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT, "'dan'" <ddorland@smednet.com>, "'jenny'"
<jgeorge74@hotmail.com>, "'K-Dog'" <StephanieKreuz@aec.ca>, "'Steel's lil
buddy'" <msawyer999@hotmail.com>, "'Zing Dong'" <zinger01@hotmail.com>
cc:
Subject: turn sound on

-----Original Message-----
From: Ganden, Garrett (CA - Calgary)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 4:04 PM
To: George, Mike (CA - Calgary)
Subject: per your request

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Balija [mailto:RBalija@smednet.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Brian Kapusta; 'Damon Reidel (E-mail)'; 'Everett Willier (E-mail)';
Garrett Ganden (E-mail); Juan Carlos Dubon; Kevin Soloski (E-mail);
'Lisa Thody'; Perry Zich (E-mail); Rudy Zich (E-mail); Shane Turriff
(E-mail); Stan 'Yumbo' Matotek (E-mail); Tammy Farion & Dan Pintaric
(E-mail); Trevor Pohl (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Airport announcements

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary James
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Anna Rybak; Ryan Jorgensen; Adam Carroll; Richard Balija; Derrick
Hauser; Rob Webb; Trevor Didluck; Richard Marsters; Craig Robinson;
Rennie Hamilton; Tina Mitchell; Jaime Ong
Subject: FW: Airport announcements

-----Original Message-----
From: RYAN SMITH [mailto:c.bonky@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 2:44 PM
To: Bruce/Debbie; Steve Zschockelt; Colin Lemecha; Gary James; Kathy
Carey; keith thompson; Leo Paquin; PETER MACK
Subject: Airport announcements

Turn your sound on......

 - Airport Announcements.doc


On the Tennessee side this deal was handled as a Back to Back and was
therefore
not 'scheduled' so I really never dealt with the particulars of this deal.  I
will try and dig up whatever info I can find on this issue.

Phil


I like this answer.

Gregg Penman
08/29/2000 08:15 AM
To: Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

Matt - Thanks for the explanation.  That makes life much simpler, at least
for now.  Illinois is currently the only state where we have employees or
inventory.  We are merely purchasing and selling natural gas in the other
locations.  If that changes in the future, I will let you know.

As always - thanks for your thorough review,

Gregg

To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

Gregg:

We should register Midwest Energy Hub, L.L.C. ("Midwest") for Sales & Use Tax
in those states in which Midwest has nexus.  Nexus requires a physical
presence (employees or inventory).  If Midwest, in foreign states (outside of
Illinois), is merely purchasing and selling natural gas, for delivery by
common carrier; Midwest does not have nexus.  Rather, Midwest is acting much
like a mail order seller.

In light of the above, could you please advise regarding Midwest's physical
presence in Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Texas and
Wisconsin.  Thanks.

- Matt
x33979

	From:  Gregg Penman @ ENRON                           08/21/2000 04:37 PM

To: Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

Matt - Per our conversation today, the following e-mail was sent by Russell
Murrell regarding the impending name change of Midwest Energy Hub, L.L.C.  My
understanding is that we have already bought/sold natural gas in Oklahoma,
Texas, and Louisianna.  The remaining states in his e-mail are potential
future places of business.  I will leave it up to your discretion as to how
you want to pursue registering for taxes in these locales.  I am guessing we
may want to register in those states we have already transacted in.  Please
let me know what you think we should do.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000
02:33 PM ---------------------------

Russell E Murrell
08/21/2000 02:19 PM
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

We may want to add Arkansas to this list too...

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell E Murrell/Corp/Enron on
08/08/2000 09:51 AM ---------------------------

Russell E Murrell
08/04/2000 11:17 AM
To: Teresa Callahan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

We will be doing the vast majority of our business in Illinois;  however we
may also transact in Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, Texas, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, Kansas.

Thanks for your help.  Let me know if you need anything.

Russell
(312) 541-1159


The attached file contains the current estimate for remediation projects.

George C. Robinson, PE
Contract Environmental Engineer
Cypress Engineering
ENRON Office: (713) 646-7327
ENRON email: george.robinson@enron.com


Attached is the draft term sheet for the Midway toll.  I have pulled in the
language from the earlier draft and incorporated Black Hills language where
applicable. I have left the pricing blank for now, subject to a refresh from
structuring.

Let's discuss sometime tomorrow.

Fred


Vance,

Deals have been created and entered in Sitara as highlighted below:

Bob

Vance L Taylor
10/20/2000 04:17 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - CUMMINGS & WALKER AND EXXON

Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty    Meter   Volumes  Price    Period  Global no.
Cummins & Walker Oil Co.  9857   600mmbtu/d  100% Gas Daily less $0.18 9/26 -
9/30 96048113
448381           100% IF/HSC less $0.18 10/1 - 10/31 96048113

Suemaur Exploration Co.   9856   2700mmbtu/d  100% Gas Daily less $0.10 10/20
- 10/31 96023525
448385

FYI, Susan will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of November.
Additionally, this is Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
04:18 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Esther Buckley                           09/26/2000 01:59 PM

To: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne E
Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne
Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - CUMMINGS & WALKER AND EXXON

See attached letters for First Deliveries


final draft of RPU.  Let me know if this is ok

If we get the PPA value today, we will include.

RPU tells us that the only thing that will be made public is the $14MM
turbine pricing.

RPU will provide us with a list of all bidders and their pricing.


John:

I got the e-mail last night with the tabs for the breakdown of the current 184 for Operations, inclusive of Power and Gas Logistics.  (The tabs total 184 with one Associate noted on a separate line in Power Logistics, and 183 without that Associate, so I don't know whether you are using 183 or 184 currently for the Operations total.) Taking this number to 100 in total is obviously a big change - 45.6% reduction.  At this moment, I don't know how feasible that is.  But I will work with Jeff, Stacey and Leslie to find out.

We  need some questions answered first to go through this:

1)  Who is coordinating the look at headcount reductions for Gas and Power Logistics?  Together, those groups represent 25% of the 184 headcount.  Going in, I would asssume that they would take their proportionate share of reductions - should be 21 reductions.  We need to know who we should work with to coordinate this.  Need names and weekend contact numbers.

2)  What will the overall headcount be for Netco?  What we need to know is how many gas and power traders there will be and whether or not their anticipated business scope changes.  If commercial numbers don't change and the business scope doesn't change, a 45.6% reduction is probably out of the question.

3)  Is the 100 number for Operations only a start-up number?  Could we anticipate adding staff as business ramps up, approval is obtained for physical gas business, etc.?  Or is the 100 number intended to be the total headcount for all of 2002?

4)  What are UBS' expectations for mid and back office?  What are the views from Legal and UBS on creating confirmations for EOL transactions?  There were some discussions with Leslie Reeves about not confirming certain types of transactions.  One firm, and I don't remember whether it was UBS or not, mentioned that we might not be the confirming agent on transactions, and that instead we would review third party paper prepared for confirmations.  That is a completely different activity than we normally engage in, and would make a difference in staffing - perhaps requiring more people!   We need to know those things from UBS to take a real stab at a revised number.  Should we just pool our knowledge from various discussions that have been had with UBS, or is there someone with UBS that we should be talking with this weekend to get there view of what is required?

5)  Does the internal RAC group go forward under a headcount reduction - i.e. will we be coordinating and providing information to them, or will UBS assume some of their functions?  This may impact our staffing needs.  What about consolidated risk reporting - will Stacey and Jeff simply transmit data to UBS, or Netco have to provide some consolidated risk reporting before sending info to UBS?

We may have more questions, but these are key now to get at a feasible number.

--Sally


Jason,

No problem. I am glad I could help. They finally called a few
days ago when they had to make the decision.

Vince

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           03/02/2000 06:07 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Say hello to a new summer associate

Vince,
I received the letter from A&A program last night.
They offered me a position of a summer associate, and I have to accept it by
March 13.
This is a tremendous news for me, and I am looking forward to this summer.

Thanks for all your help,

Jason Sokolov


Again, Kent is negotiating this directly, so I don't know what the current
version looks like.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 01:59
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/09/2001 03:23:08 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject: Salmon Energy: Consent and Assignment Agreement

Kay:

Here are my comments to the consent and assignment agreement.

Kent

 <<NY003699615_.doc>>

 - NY003699615_.doc


I  would love it if we could meet.  We have made a little bit of headway in
this effort, but quite frankly, not much.  In fact, I have seen DASH's that
is indicating the purchase of public equity and I am trying to find out who
and how etc these are being transacted.  Can you set something up or do you
need me to. I will bring somebody from my group to help and learn so we
probably need a conference room.  Thanks for keeping this issue alive.
Donna  P.S.  Has Marie moved to EBS or is she still with you?

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/23/2000 08:59 AM
To: Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: monitoring of equity accounts

Donna:  It's been awhile since we last spoke about advising Enron companies
of existing brokerage accounts.  It has also been determined (in legal) that
the accounts will remain with ME and not move to Alan A.  I have some
temporary assistance in that an A&K lawyer, Jason Peters, is working up here
for another few weeks.  I was hoping that we could all meet and put our
"project" into action.  Please give me a call and suggest some time when we
may meet.  Thanks.  Sara


Humberto - I forwarded your resume to Barry Hunsaker who is general counsel
at EOG Resources.  As you may know, EOG used to be Enron Oil and Gas, a
majority-owned Enron subsidiary.  A couple of years ago, Enron sold its
interest in EOG and it became a stand alone company.  EOG Resources has been
doing very well.  I don't know if they are looking for lawyers now, but I
think I sent your resume to the right place.

"Humberto Kuhn" <BetoKuhn@msn.com> on 05/21/2001 11:17:21 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Humberto (Beto) Kuhn, resume

Dear Steve:? With sincere and advance thanks, and pursuant to your recent
conversation with my brother, George, I attach a copy of?the short version?of
my resume.? I have a longer detailed version, as well as numerous references,
that I will be pleased to furnish you.? In addition, I am at your disposal at
any time that?you or any others at ENRON should wish to meet with me.?
Again,?my thanks for your assistance and guidance.
?
Kind regards,
?
?
Beto Kuhn
Cell:? 713/ 906-8463
Res:? 713/ 467-3974
 - RESUME HGK,Short Form 05-01.doc


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/06/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           09/06/2000 09:47 AM

To: Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CIAC

Fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/06/2000
09:47 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           09/06/2000 09:22 AM

To: Robert Guthrie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CIAC

Robert, in response to your question, I don't know who the El Paso tax
contact is, but I'll find out & let you know.  Thanks again.