Randy, this is the issue I left you the voice mail on.  Article 6 of the
Gallup Compression Services Agreement (which I am sending to you separately)
with ECS obligates ECS to "work in good faith with CDEC" to establish an
automated system that would automatically have alerted us to peak loading
conditions on CDEC's system.  We had a pretty good idea when we signed the
contract that ECS would not be able to complete that by the contract start
date, so we negotiated a fall back plan under which ECS is obligated to
"assist [Transwestern] in developing a manual system to accomplish the same
result and will hold harmless and keep [Transwestern] whole for all cost and
expenses" associated with the manual system.  We will fight with them about
who owes the $200k that James mentions below based on their failure to
"assist" us in managing the cost.  In the mean time, we need to make sure
that we are doing everything we can to get a handle on the situation to
mitigate future costs.  Do we have someone who is watching this out there?
We are running so full tilt on TW that we may not have as much flexibiltiy to
manage this situation as we expected, but let me know what we can do.  James
had heard that one hold up was the absence of a confidentiality agreement--I
guess between ECS and Transwestern--that would permit ECS to communicate to
us the details on how to access teh key info. from CDEC.  That sounds like a
BS excuse from ECS, but it that's what they are saying, let me know and we
can figure out a solution.  Thanks.  DF

James Centilli
12/14/2000 02:49 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Rebate

Would you please contact Gerald Nemec and review the Gallup Compression
Service Contract in respect to the Load Control Management.  My understanding
was that ECS was to provide a means to access CDEC's online profile in order
for us to make a decision to avoid running the compressor during CDEC's peak
load periods.  We have not received access to this information which has
resulted so far in additional electric cost of $200,987.33 for the period of
July through September.  Additional cost will be incurred for the remainder
of this year, that I have not been able to review yet.  This cost is
averaging $79,000 per month if we continue to run the compressor as we have
in August and September.


I started a spreadsheet for us to keep track of our books, traders, file names, etc.

It is saved in O:\erms\erms_adm\Netco\Controls\Trader Matrix.xls

Please add any other fields you think we should have.  Jeff mentioned he wants to be able to quickly tell what books belong to what traders, O'neil had this idea.
Is everyone ready to start setting up their books today?  Has Scott Neal gotten back to you yet Phillip?

KK


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/13/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	10/13/2000 02:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Meeting been rescheduled between the governor and Skilling yet?

I checked with Skilling's office and there is nothing scheduled.    The
Gov.'s office bascially said "don't call us, we'll call you".

     Maureen


Hi Don,

Just wanted to get this out to you in the hope that you havent worked on January's and this month's schedule. I had already planned to be in Denver to ski (know any good resorts?) and then spend the new year with my family..earlier the plan was to do this from the26th onwards..as scheduled, but since we might not get our vacation from Enron at all.. I was wondering if everything being exegient, I could take off a little early and arrive into say the 4th or so of Jan?

This of course being that I dont upset too many other schedules and no news occurs upon us which would preclude this.

Also on an unrelated note..the people from Trader News called and wanted prices,...but I have not sent them anything not knowing our legal position on the same.

See you in a bit.

Regards,

Punit.


No comments.   And continued good luck with the process.

Best,
Jeff


Sue: Could you use your contacts with Edelman to get on the phone with Scott,
Mark and Karen to jump start this thing?

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/21/2001 08:26 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "ryang@enron.com"
<ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com"
<vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Direct Access

The direct access coalition had a conference call today to discuss
strategy.

The Chamber, Retailers and the Manufacturers met with the Governor's
office and Senator Burton to discuss DA.  The Retailers and the
Manufacturers came away somewhat disenchanted.  There was little support
for DA, especially from Senator Burton, and the Governor's office was
unfocused.  The Chamber wasn't as pessimistic as the others because the
Governor's office was focused on other things and did not necessarily
shoot down DA.

As requested, I urged the group to utilize Edelman Public Relations who
is under contract to AREM.  The group as whole was very supportive.
There was some reluctance for fear of upsetting Senator Bowen and
Governor Davis.  Several members of the coalition, including the
Manufacturers, Retailers, Grocers and myself,  dismissed those fears and
took the tact that the time is now and we have little to lose given
recent statements by legislators and the administration.  Aaron Thomas
with AES agreed to contact AREM and Edelman to develop a strategy but I
think a call from Enron directly to AREM would be beneficial to speed
the process up.

The group is going to meet with DWR and continue their individual
lobbying efforts.  Their intent is to address the bonding and net short
fears raised by finance and DWR.  Enron had discussed hiring bond
counsel.  Has this occurred, and if so, should attend the DWR meeting?

The group is also going to meet with TURN to try and address their
core/non-core issues, if possible in order to try and get them on board
with the coalition proposal.


Steve, FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Unverzagt, Andy
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Olson, Cindy
Cc:	Mcconnell, Mike; Fallon, Jim
Subject:	Re: Enron - Dynegy Integration Team Members

To:  Cindy Olsen
Copy:  Mike McConnell, Jim Fallon
Re: Enron - Dynegy Integration Team Members

As I was reading Ken Lay's announcements about Enron's merger with Dynegy, he mentioned forming an integration team.

Having twenty-three plus years of a wide range of knowledge and experience across much of Enron, I feel and believe I could be a key contributor in the integration of our two companies together.

My career with Enron has ranged from activities with many parts of our trading business, key roles in large and complex Merger and Acquisition projects, as well as working on our various pipelines.

I would like to be considered to be part of the transition team.

Your support would be appreciated,

Andy Unverzagt
Vice President
Enron Broadband Services


Sorry - I read the first e-mail before seeing this one.  Thanks for not asking me where my head was when we talked!! --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Marshall, Lucy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:49 PM
To:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Leff, Dan; Hickerson, Gary; Malcolm, Rodney; Hughes, James A.; Dimichele, Rich; Causey, Richard; Hermann, Robert; Buy, Rick; Beck, Sally; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hayslett, Rod; Shaw, Eric; Collins, Angie; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Zoch, Judy; Elbertson, Janette; Valdez, Christina; Heathman, Karen K.; Westbrook, Sharron; Alcantara, Ana; Collett, Crissy; Blackwood, Connie; Short, Carol
Subject:	Canceling Post Petition Meeting

The Post Petition Meeting which took place every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 am is being cancelled.  We are currently organizing an Enron Wholesale Meeting and will communicate once finalized.  Issues that were addressed at the post petition meeting will be handled at either the Management Committee Meeting or the new Wholesale Meeting.

Thank you.

===================================
Lucy Marshall
Executive Assistant to Jim Fallon
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
Office 713-853-4525
Fax    713-345-7864
Cell    713-417-7802
lucy.marshall@enron.com


Can't wait to see you tonight!

Ps. This documents I am truly think of you at all times.

Love,

Craig

XXX (no bites)


George:
The Select EEI Master has been signed by EPMI and forwarded to Select.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 01:35 PM -----

	Lance Schuler-Legal
	04/11/2001 01:17 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron,
Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, James
Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hawaii Presentation

W. Lance Schuler
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3826
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713/853-5419
Fax:  713/646-3393
Email:  lance.schuler-legal@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 01:11 PM -----

	Darlene C Forsyth/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/11/2001 08:23 AM

		 To: AnnMarie Tiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Brent Vasconcellos/ENRON@enronXgate,
Danny Wilson/ENRON@enronXgate, David C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, James
Sandt/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Quaintance
Jr/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: davidbarbour@akllp.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Charles Delacey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gareth Bahlmann/ENRON@enronXgate, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Bowes/ENRON@enronXgate, Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate, Barry
Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Leslie Linares/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Hawaii Presentation

David Barbour, Andrews & Kurth, with the assistance of Enron representatives
from Global Finance Commercial, Legal, Accounting, and Tax, will make a
presentation on the Hawaii 125/140 Structure on Monday, April 30th, from
11:30 - 1:00, in EB 30C1.

Please feel free to extend an invitation to whomever in your Group who may
benefit from this presentation.

Please RSVP to Leslie Linares at x 57730 or by email, by Thursday, April 27,
as lunch will be served.

Thanks,
Darlene


thanks for showing up to the party on sunday.  your new name backout
ballases!


If you can not see the links or images  in this e-mail, click  here  and sign in to select to receive future e-mails in text format only. http://www.delta.com/emailprograms/
 SkyMiles Offers Special Offers
 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] In this email Your Special Offer     @delta.com [IMAGE]  Manage E-mail Programs  Subscribe/Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Special Offers from delta.com [IMAGE] Hello Mr. Farmer,  This fall, our SkyMiles partners are offering great savings on hotels and gift items, as well as special offers for credit cards and loans. Not only will you save money with these products and services, you'll also earn miles. To learn more, take a look at the offers below .  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]Partner Offers[IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Delta SkyMiles Credit Card Double Miles on Everything You Buy. From 10/15/2001 to 11/30/2001, earn Double Miles on everything you buy, everywhere you use your Delta SkyMiles Credit Card from American Express. That means double miles not just at supermarkets, gas stations, home improvement stores, drugstores, etc. - but everywhere you use the Card. [IMAGE] American Express  [IMAGE] Go  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Radisson Hotels The Radisson Go Free Package makes it easy to go! The Go Free package includes 2 weekend nights for the price of 1, a free breakfast for two and a free Go Pack. Also earn 500 SkyMiles per stay. To book and for complete terms, click GO.  Valid through 12/30/01. [IMAGE] Radisson  [IMAGE] Go  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE] See America with Starwood Hotels & Resorts Stay at Westin
, Sheraton
, Four Points
 by Sheraton, St.Regis
, The Luxury Collection
 and W Hotels
 and take advantage of $49 to $179 weekend rates (Thurs-Sun) and savings of up to 40% on weekday rates (Mon-Wed) from now until January 27, 2002.* To take advantage of these and other special rates book online or call 1-877-782-0114 - mention promotion code GOUSADL. [IMAGE] Starwood  [IMAGE] Go  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 1800Flowers.com Every day is a great day to gift, and earn double miles! As a Delta SkyMiles member, you'll earn double miles** for any purchase of $29.99 or more when you mention promotion code DEL. [IMAGE] 1800Flowers.com  [IMAGE] Go  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE] LendingTree Refinance your home at LendingTree.com/Delta now--rates are incredibly low! Earn thousands of miles with your transaction, and with our real estate, home equity and auto products too. How? Click GO! [IMAGE] Lending Tree  [IMAGE] Go  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]Terms and ConditionsReturn to Top. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] *For complete Terms & Conditions visit Starwood online .  **Exclusive of applicable service and shipping charges and taxes. Items may vary and are subject to availability, delivery rules and times. Offer available online and by phone. Offers cannot be combined and are not available on all products. Offer valid through 12/31/01. Subject to the 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 participation in the Delta SkyMiles Program. All standard Delta SkyMiles program rules and conditions apply. Void where prohibited. ?2001 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, INC.   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
  [IMAGE] COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Delta Air Lines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of this message or its contents, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.  This is a post only e-mail. Please do not respond to this message. [IMAGE]


Pay it. Have a nice time.


i HEA RYOU LOUD AND CLEAR.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 08:06 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	03/06/2001 07:41 PM

		 To: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Escalante (E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'"
<bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa
(E-mail)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack
(E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe
Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<joer@calpine.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo
(E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'"
<kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>,
"'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Steve
Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Tony
Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'" <alexm@calpine.com>, "Bob
Szymanski (E-mail)" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "'D. Frank (E-mail)'"
<dfrank@seawestwindpower.com>, "'David Dickey (E-mail)'"
<david.dickey@calenergy.com>, "'Doug Levitt (E-mail)'" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Eric Edstrom'"
<edstrome@epenergy.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Julie Simon (E-mail)'" <jsimon@epsa.org>,
"'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'" <lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "'Mark J. Smith'"
<mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "'Nam
Nguyen'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <Pete@calwind.com>,
"'Rich Dyer (E-mail)'" <rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "'Robert Frees
(E-mail)'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Scott Harlan'" <harlans@epenergy.com>, "'Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail)'" <ted_cortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Thomas Heller
(E-mail)'" <hellertj@apci.com>, "'Tom Hartman'" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "'Ward
Scobee (E-mail)'" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown
(E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
"'Jean Munoz (E-mail)'" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Katie
Kaplan (E-mail)'" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi (E-mail)'"
<kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson
(E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom
Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
		 Subject: FYI_____ISO announces  Market Stabilization Proposal

Greetings:
The ISO will be holding a conference call to discuss a Market Stabilization
Plan on Friday at 10:00 a.m. PST. They will be releasing the plan tomorrow
by COB (midnight) and IEP will review it ASAP.  We will also participate in
the Conference Call on Friday and let everyone know what is going on.  We'll
keep you posted....

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Woertz, Byron [mailto:BWoertz@caiso.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:43 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
Subject: CAISO Notice - Market Stabilization Proposal - Conference Call

                ISO Market Participants:
                The ISO has developed a market stabilization plan, designed
to stabilize operations and control costs in California, to be implemented
in the next two months.  It would remain in place for the near term (through
Summer, 2001 and beyond) and includes changes to existing ISO practices as
well as an expansion of the ISO's responsibilities.  Because of the need to
move quickly so that the plan can be implemented by this summer, we will be
unable to hold a full stakeholder review process.  But, we do want to
discuss the plan with you so that you can understand the proposal and the
reasoning behind it.
                The ISO will post this plan on the ISO web site at
http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/ <http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/> , by
COB tomorrow.  In addition, we will host a conference call from 10:00 a.m.
to 2:00 p.m. PST this Friday, March 9, to discuss the plan with you and
clarify any outstanding issues.  We then plan to request the Board's
approval for this plan on March 15th in order to be able to implement the
plan by summer.
                The call in information is as follows:
                Market Stabilization Conference Call
                Friday, March 9, 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. PST
                Call-In Number:         877-381-6005
                Conference ID #:        760357
                Leader Name:    Byron Woertz
                Following the call, you may submit any comments on the plan
to us by close of business on Tuesday, March 13.  You may send your comments
to bwoertz@caiso.com.  We will do our best to summarize your comments and
present them to the Board at their March 15 meeting. In addition, there will
be a public comment period on the 15th.
                Please contact me if you have any further questions.
                Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
                Director, Client Relations
                (916) 608-7066


1. For this week, please be sure you have read a story on determinants or
costs
of long-term or very high inflation and/or on very high or long-term
unemployment.  Later in the course we will examine changes in unemployment and
inflation (and their relation) in the short run; this week we focus on
definitions and long-run determinants and costs.  (Hint: for unemployment,
what
has happened to the workweek in France?)

2. Concerning growth, you might want to look at:  Report: Corruption Ruining
Economies Of South Asia
        http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/19991101/wl/asia_un_1.html
(a Reuters story)

3. Concerning measurement of "The New Economy," a fellow student recommends
the
Economist article at
http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/current/index_fn8276.html
will all the pretty pics and graphs, or the plain text version below.

E-xaggeration: The digital economy is much smaller than you think

NEWSPAPERS and magazines are packed with stories about the digital economy,
the information-technology (IT) revolution and the Internet age. That their
pages are filled with advertising from IT firms presumably has nothing to do
with it. Such firms account for a quarter of the total value of the S&P 500,
and this week Dow Jones announced that Microsoft, Intel and SBC
Communications will be included in its industrial average from November 1st.
Not before time, many say, for high-technology businesses now account for a
huge chunk of the economy. Actually, they don't.
New figures published on October 28th by America's Department of Commerce
appear to support the view that IT is very important to the American
economy. The department now counts all business spending on software as
investment (previously, it was a cost). This has both increased the apparent
size of IT investment and boosted America's rate of growth in recent years.
But measuring the size of the "new" economy is a statistical minefield. The
most generous estimate comes from the OECD, which tracks the
"knowledge-based economy". It estimates that this accounts for 51% of total
business output in the developed economies-up from 45% in 1985. But this
definition, which tries to capture all industries that are relatively
intensive in their inputs of technology and human capital, is implausibly
wide. As well as computers and telecoms, it also includes cars, chemicals,
health, education, and so forth. It would be a stretch to call many of these
businesses "new".
A study published in June by the Department of Commerce estimates that the
digital economy-the hardware and software of the computer and telecoms
industries-amounts to 8% of America's GDP this year. If that sounds rather
disappointing, then a second finding-that IT has accounted for 35% of total
real GDP growth since 1994-should keep e-fanatics happy.
Perhaps unwisely. A new analysis by Richard Sherlund and Ed McKelvey of
Goldman Sachs argues that even this definition of "technology" is too wide.
They argue that since such things as basic telecoms services, television,
radio and consumer electronics have been around for ages, they should be
excluded. As a result, they estimate the computing and
communications-technology sector at a more modest 5% of GDP-up from 2.8% in
1990. This would make it bigger than the car industry, but smaller than
health care or finance. In most other economies, the share is lower; for the
world as a whole, therefore, the technology sector might be only 3-4% of
GDP.
But what, you might ask, about the Internet? Goldman Sachs's estimate
includes Internet service providers, such as America Online, and the
technology and software used by online retailers, such as Amazon.com. It
does not, however, include transactions over the Internet. Should it?
E-business is tiny at present, but Forrester Research, an Internet
consultancy, estimates that this will increase to more than $1.5 trillion in
America by 2003. Internet bulls calculate that this would be equivalent to
about 13% of GDP. Yet it is misleading to take the total value of such goods
and services, whose production owes nothing to the Internet. The value added
of Internet sales-ie, its contribution to GDP-would be much less, probably
little more than 1% of GDP.
This is not to deny that the Internet is changing the way that many firms do
business-by, for example, enabling them to slim inventories-but, in the near
future, as a proportion of GDP, it is likely to remain small.
A Luddite's lament

If measuring the size of the technology sector is hard, calculating its
contribution to real economic growth is trickier still, because the prices
of IT goods and services (adjusted for quality) have fallen sharply relative
to the prices of other goods and services. For example, official figures
show that America's spending on IT has risen by 14% a year in nominal terms
since 1992, but by more than 40% a year in real terms. This figure is so
high partly because it is extremely sensitive to assumptions about the rate
at which the price and quality of IT is changing.
The Commerce Department calculates that the technology sector has
contributed 35% to overall economic growth over the past four years. But
because such figures are based on spending in real terms, the Goldman Sachs
study reckons they are misleading. In nominal terms, IT has accounted for a
more modest 10% of GDP growth in the past four years.
Another popularly quoted figure is that business spending on IT has risen
from 10% of firms' total capital-equipment investment in 1980 to 60% today.
But again, this is based on constant-dollar figures, and so it hugely
exaggerates the true increase. In terms of current dollars (and before the
latest revisions), Goldman Sachs calcuate that business investment in
computers accounts for 35% of total capital spending, not 60%. And even this
exaggerates the importance of IT, because much of the money goes to replace
equipment which becomes obsolete ever more quickly. The share of IT in
additional "net" investment is much smaller. Computers still account for
only 2% of America's total net capital stock.
For years economists have been seeking in vain for evidence that computers
have dramatically raised productivity. One explanation for the failure of
productivity to surge may be that official statistics are understating its
growth. Another is that much investment in IT has been wasted: hours spent
checking e-mail, surfing the Net or playing games reduce, not increase,
productivity. A third may simply be that IT is still too small to make a
difference: for the moment, appropriately enough, you can count the digital
economy on the fingers of one hand.
That is changing, and firms are learning. And note this: if you add in all
computer software and telecoms (on the widest definition), the share of IT
in the capital stock rises to 10-12%. As it happens, this is almost the same
as railways at the peak of America's railway age in the late 19th century.
Railways boosted productivity and changed the face of Victorian commerce.
Hype is hype-but the new economy may yet happen anyway.

LINKS
The Commerce Department's statistics on information technology spending are
summarised in a press release
<http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/1999/cb99-205.html>. The complete
text of Emerging digital economy II
<http://www.ecommerce.gov/ede/report.html>, issued in June 1999, has been
released on the web. Details of the OECD's research on knowledge-based
economies are available here
<http://www.oecd.org//dsti/sti/stat-ana/prod/scorebd_summ.htm>. Forrester's
latest e-commerce estimates are published as a chart and table
<http://www.forrester.com/ER/Press/ForrFind/0,1768,0,FF.html>.

David I. Levine                 Associate professor
Haas School of Business    ph: 510/642-1697
University of California    fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA  94720-1900                            email:
levine@haas.berkeley.edu
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/


His list does not include any of the transport positions.  It also includes some deals with the Chicago office that should not be included in the deal value.

DG

-----Original Message-----
From: McCaffrey, Deirdre
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: Peoples Cash Flow 1-22-02 - Russell.xls


Thanks alot.

-----Original Message-----
From: Customer Service10
[mailto:customerservice10@sierratradingpost.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:36 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: 1967119/Shipping/Change of Method

Dear Mark Whitt,

Thank you for your recent order via our website. Fortunately, we were able
to change your shipping method before the package shipped. It will now be
shipped via expedited ground, and should arrive in 5-7 business days. This
will change the total cost of your order to $79.40.

Unless you choose another method, all web orders are shipped SURFACE (via
Parcel Post). This is your most cost effective shipping option (unless time
is a factor), because it's based on the very low "bulk" rates Sierra Trading
Post is able to negotiate due to its huge shipping volume.

If you would like to specify another method of shipment, please remember to
do so in the "Shipping" choices section during check-out, or place a note in
the "Comments" section.

Thanks for shopping with us. We appreciate your business.

Sincerely,

Vici
Customer Service
Sierra Trading Post
trk


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:59 AM
To:	Rawson, Lester
Subject:	RE: 1/30

Bill and I are considering having Real time do the EPE preschedules since they are the ones that live and die by them anyway.  That way you would be released from that burden and any errors would be all on the ownership of RT.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rawson, Lester
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:20 PM
To:	El Paso dispatchers; Greg Grill; jhadda; Kathy Peterson; Luis Zaragoz; Powermarketing
Cc:	Semperger, Cara; Cutsforth, Diane
Subject:	1/30

I'll be out tomorrow and Thursday back on Friday.

Diane Cutsforth will be working on the EPE schedule. She can be reached at 503-464-3831.

See ya'll Friday.

Les

 << File: EPE_JAN_2002.xls >>


names for software addition of Hear Me

Fletch Sturm
Andy Lewis
Robin Menear
Patrice Thurston
Kevin Ruscitti
Geoff Storey
Sylvia Pollan
Martin Cuilla
Kelli Stevens
Tom Donohoe
Joe Parks


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanchez, Monique
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	'jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com'
Subject:	FW: Everest Tragedy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanchez, Monique
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:53 AM
To:	'hotmail.com,ksanchez@houstonisd.org,sscott5@enron.com,emharris@dow.com'
Subject:	FW: Everest Tragedy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanchez, Monique
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:52 AM
To:	'jake_scarbrough@hotmail.com,'; 'jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com,'
Subject:	Everest Tragedy

This email just came in today.  One of our brokers from New York has a brother in-law who just summited Everest yesterday at 10eastern.  There is a west gas trader that works in new york that is writing the account below.  Apparently there was a drastic change in the elements and several are already dead and there is a major rescue underway.  I haven't even found anything on this yet on the internet, though i expect there will be news shortly.  I thought you all would be moved by this account.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Frank Ermis" <fermis@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Frank+20Ermis+22+20+3Cfermis+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Sanchez, Monique
Subject:	Fwd: FW: spoke too soon

>From: Trevor Vaughan <TVaughan@prebon.com>
>To: "'fermis@hotmail.com'" <fermis@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: spoke too soon
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:24:13 -0400
>
>this is an email form owen west, he' s a basis trader form j.aron who's
>scaling everst
>we've been getting weekly update that were all pretty honky-dory till this
>one
>this email was sent fom 8000 meters yesterday
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Donald Tencellent Jr.
> > Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:07 AM
> > To:	Trevor Vaughan
> > Subject:	FW: spoke too soon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > From: 	Nagle, Rita[SMTP:rita.nagle@gs.com]
> > Sent: 	Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:47 AM
> > To: 	Donald Tencellent Jr.
> > Subject: 	FW: spoke too soon
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: himex [mailto:expedition@everestbasecamp.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:03 AM
> > To: patrickw@Youthstream.com; gamacorp@aol.com; owenandsuz@yahoo.com;
> > richard.ruzika@gs.com; rita.nagle@gs.com; njones@thecarlylegroup.com;
> > jeff.reznick@gs.com; dmandel@sjga.com
> > Subject: spoke too soon
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately i am too late to halt my last email. Perspective comes
> > quickly
> > at 8000 meters and today, thinking back on the ascent and all the rock
> > climbing moves on that ridge that might have left me dead given my
> > perpetually clumsy condition (wrsened by AMS), I am happy to be alive.
>The
> > weather is beautiful but the mountain has bitten back and many are dead
> > and
> > dying, including friends of mine from my own team who summitted too late
> > for
> > the north side. By the time i am allowed to send this, the media will
>have
> > already begun reporting on this tragedy. I was slowed by my vomiting and
> > had
> > i continued, i likely would have been trudging up with this group.
> >
> > In my last email there is black humor concerning one of my friends:
> > ensuring
> > his safety so suz and i could take a vacation. He is stuck on the ridge
> > now,
> > dying, and will likely be dead by morning. One of our strongest guides
>is
> > with him and he, too, will probably die. This guy is super strong but
>the
> > altitude has snatched him. We're in shock here and can do nothing but
> > stare
> > into telescopes and pray that they continue the bleak fight. I have been
> > assigned NOK duty and have made two very tough phone calls to young
>wives.
> > A
> > member of the Aussie expedition died suddenly at Camp 2 this morning, 3
> > Russians are stuck with our men on the ridge, and a spaniard is flirting
> > with death right now after a bout with cerebral edema, despite Chris
> > Warner's valiant effort to get him down from the ridge last night. When
>i
> > think of this mountain now, i think only of death.
> >
> > Russ is quite experienced in hig-altitude rescues but this is the first
> > time
> > he has unleashed the team for our own. It is a totaly professional
> > logistical operation (locating and moving oxygen and regulataors back up
> > into the jet stream), relying heavily on the sherps who are just
> > incredibly
> > strong. Many stories of heroism over last 24 hours and many to come. The
> > guide and the client spent the night on the ridge (8650 meters),
> > incoherent
> > and immobile, freezing, but they were saved when Asmus turned around
>from
> > a
> > desperate stumble home, climbed the second step (brutal) for the second
> > time
> > in 10 hours, and delivered oxygen to the desperate pair just before
>dark.
> > Asmus tried to roust them and then had to dash for lower altitudes,
> > reaching
> > top camp (8300 meters...still incredibly dangerous) at 11:30 pm. It was
>a
> > relatively warm night (just below)and both client and guide were seen
> > moving
> > space blankets this morning through the telescope. Alive. But they could
> > not
> > stand. One could not see. No comms. Bivouacs above 8000 meters are epics
> > and
> > you are sure to read about this.
> >
> > Coordinating therescue from the Col, Russ then rousted all available
> > bodies
> > and they started up the ridge for the second time in as many days, Purba
> > and
> > Lopsang leading the way back into the death zone, humping oxygen. The
> > American expedition came upont the bodies this morning and have given up
> > their summit attempt (remember, they failed last week and also failed in
> > '99
> > so this is a huge sacrifice) to make the rescue. It looked bleak this
> > morning but after some injections our teammates began to move, carried
>by
> > the strong Americans. As i type, they have been moving at a snail's pace
> > and
> > the Americans will soon have to leave them to save themselves.We hope
>our
> > sherps are there by then and can take over for what is turning out to be
> > an
> > absolutely epic and incredibly dangerous rescue. Remember, that ridge is
> > 14
> > inches across for stretches, dropping 10,000 feet on either side. When i
> > gazed down 2 nights ago, it was truly like staring out of the window of
>a
> > plane, so steep was the drop. The sherps are going to have to be
>supermen.
> >
> > From the ridge and high camp, chris and asmus (they've been wasting
>there
> > for over 36 hours now) have been gathering oxygen for the 2000 meter
> > descent
> > to ABC. They are sucking some themselves to ensure we don't have a
> > double-rescue. I'm feeling better and i may be going up to the col to
>help
> > with the rescue, assuming we get these guys off the ridge alive. Too
>high
> > for a helo on this side so we'll have to platoon them down asap. Other
> > members who summitted earlier are still up too high, too slow descending
> > from 'safe' camps, and i may help them down as well. So i will not be
>back
> > by mem day--we have to get these people down.
> >
> > The drama unfolded yesterday as i stared through a spotting scope,
>sulking
> > and making occasional trips to the waste moraine. The client was slower
> > and
> > slower and then he just stopped on the summit snow field. I thought: uh
> > oh.
> > Russ had warned them hours before to turn but summit fever had taken
>hold
> > and the guide was pursuaded by the client. Soon russ was on the radio
> > screaming at the guide to drag the client down, but the hour grew late
>and
> > suddenly a successful summit evolved into a death trap, both men
>immobile
> > and nearly incoherent, the guide kicking and draggin the client, to no
> > avail. Asmus was with them and performed valiantly, as i mentioned, but
>no
> > one was in a position to help. At that height, every second counts and
>the
> > other teams rushed past on their way to safety. When you rush into a
> > burning
> > building you can't linger, especially if your physical performance is
> > literally cut in half.
> >
> > I am praying for these two--and the russians--and  it's hard to think f
> > anything else as they progress home, mumbling, step by step. I have
> > messages
> > from their wives but they are unable to [process spoken language at this
> > point. Even if they get down, i wonder what the results will be. It's
> > really
> > sad. I am sure they are also severely dehydrated--i'll explain the
>process
> > when i get home but siffice to say you literally can't boil water fast
> > enough to keepup with needs of body at altitude. My heartbeat at top
>camp
> > was 180 when i was 'resting' in my sleeping bag before the attempt. My
> > tongue split down the middle even though i was trying to keep the fluids
> > coming at a rate of a liter an hour, doing nothing.
> >
> > I feel lucky today. Very lucky. When i think of my own descent, alone,
> > throwing up along the way yesterday, i realize just how razor-thin this
> > whole thing is. There were times on the ridge where i was hanging by my
> > jumar on a supposedly new rope, ony to reach the anchor point to find a
> > ten-year-old knot, totally fried by the uv rays. Other times i stepped
>in
> > snow footprints and slipped, sliding down on my stomach until the rope
> > jerked taut. Too many ways to die here.The aussie who gave me his water
>in
> > the bowl may have prevented another casualty. Who's to say? Problem here
> > is
> > that, unlike the events we're used to when we sprint to the finish line
> > (we
> > used to say in crew that the perfect race was when you passsed out at
>the
> > finish), you have to reserve a certain amount to get the hell down the
> > mountain. And it's so hard to do that. Is a quarter tank enough? Half?
>Or
> > do
> > you need even more because, in truth, you are dying from the moment you
> > leave camp 3 (not even top camp).
> >
> > I will pass this info only when the word is out--sorry--but will keep
>you
> > updated from there once i talk ro russ. It's hard watching friends die
>but
> > we're helpless down here.
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


__________________

Gentlemen:
Please be advised that there will be a FERC Group conference call on
Wednesday, April 18, 2001 at 2:00 p.m. EDT.  The dial-in information is as
follows:

Date:        Wednesday, April 18, 2001
Time:         2:00 p.m. EDT
Host:          Dan Watkiss
Dial In:        800-447-1794
Host Code:   909007  (Dan only)
Participant:    929770

You may reply by e-mail or call 202-828-5856 with any questions.  Thank you.


We shall talk on Monday.    There was a discussion about this on Friday, Noel,
Phil, Melissa, Joanne and myself.    Someone will be in touch on Monday.

Joan_Veselack@enron.com on 01/29/2000 11:37:23 AM
Please respond to Joan_Veselack@enron.com

To: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Heidi
Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
bperrone@columbiaenergy.com
cc: rsupert@ect.enron.com, sneal@ect.enron.com, rallwein@ect.enron.com,
Joann_Collins@enron.com, vlamadr@ect.enron.com, kkelly@ect.enron.com,
shendri@ect.enron.com, djenkin@ect.enron.com, cgerman@ect.enron.com, Kim
Novsek
Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
Subject: Re: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 - NEED ANSWER

What's the final answer.... do you need the enduser gas or do you want me
to cut the enduser gas? P

 If you really need the enduser gas... the only other option is for me...
is to beg TCO to let me inject some pool gas into storage for that gas day
to avoid the $10 withdrawal penalty... but we would still incur the overrun
charge plus the additional overrun charge to get the gas into storage. Need
a decision by 1 pm CST time on Monday, January 31st. Thank you!!!!

Please pass this note to Melissa... still don't have her e-mail address.

Can't wait for it to warm up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Joan Veselack
 pic29906.pcx) 01/27/2000 07:38 PM

To:   hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:   mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com,
      Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
      Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
      Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
      Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  TCO STOW Overage - 1/24

Kara/Heidi, please give this to Brian and Melissa.

Because the burns significantly increased on 1/24 from the forecasted
amount (+16749). Contract #63281 was over-run and Storage #51407 was
over-withdrawn. Contract over-run is $.21 per dkt and storage
over-withdrawls are $10 per dkt.

Because the forecast was lower, I let Joann use the extra space for CES
Enduser Market. TCO will let me cut gas to CES Enduser Markets as a retro.
Not sure if you want this gas to flow or try to make it up over the
weekend. If you need the gas to flow because of OFO penalties, maybe the
storage over-withdrawal is cheaper than incurring OFO penalties. Please
tell me what you want me to do. Need to do the retro's ASAP while TCO is
still feeling generous.

FYI, the traders at Enron talked to Noel Bartlo on Tuesday. Noel said any
costs over the space that retail had (134,710 for choice), Enron had the
right to pass on the costs. I really hope the Noel communicated that to CES
Retail. I would hate to have a huge misunderstanding between Enron and CES
Retail. Remember, we schedulers are caught in the middle... and don't try
to cause unnecessary pain.

63281/236 coh 7-1        2934/2872
63281/170 coh 7-5        1922/1881
63281/99  coh 5-2        427/418
63281/221 cpa8-35   1639/1604
63281/220 cpa8-35   511/500

Total                    7433/7275

 - pic29906.pcx


Hi, Sally,

Thanks for your email. Attached please find my resume. I just rotated out of
CTG of ENA and joined Risk Management of EBS for my third rotation. I'd like
to meet and talk briefly with you. Let me know your convenient time. Thank
you.

Jun

	Sally Beck@ECT
	07/19/00 12:41 PM

		 To: Jennifer Bratton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Yvan
Chaxel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin Chola/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelly
Friesenhahn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Cheryl
Ingstad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nicole La/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erwin
Landivar/SA/Enron@Enron, Nicole Palczer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Inderpal Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Glenn
Surowiec/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miguel Vasquez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jun
Wang/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Laura Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Grant Zimmerman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Associates PRC Meeting - To Be Rescheduled

Today's Associates PRC meeting that was to begin at 1:30 has been cancelled
and will be rescheduled for a date yet to be determined.  Both the morning
Analyst PRC meeting and the Associates PRC meeting were scheduled for the
same location and with Joe Sutton as chair.  The Analysts PRC meeting is
apparently running very long, so someone from the program office called to
cancel the Associates PRC meeting for this afternoon.  I will let you know as
soon as I know a rescheduled date.

In preparation for today's PRC meeting, I was able to meet in person with
most of your supervisors to get input on your job responsiblities,
accomplishments and performance.  For those that were unavailable for a
meeting, we managed a phone call or at least a series of voice mails to
accomplish the same thing.  I also have any materials that you may have
provided to your supervisor for the mid-year review process, as well as
copies of the internal feedback that was gathered through the PEP system.

With this delay in the meeting date, I have the time to ask for a copy of
your resume.  The PRC process clearly focuses on your performance
specifically from January through June 2000.  However, it would be helpful to
me in representing you to at least be familiar with your backgrounds.  Please
e:mail a copy to me or you can send a hard copy to EB3015.  A couple of you
have come by my office to meet with me.  I would also be happy to put a name
and face together for others of you or to talk by phone if you are not in
Houston.  My extension is 35926.


Start Date: 1/27/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012714.txt


If you are reading this message in plaintext or if you have an AOL address you must click on this link: http://listserv.otcjournal.com/otcjournal/20010602-1.html  and wait for a web page to automatically open up to properly read this newsletter.
[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

  [IMAGE] June 2, 2001 [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Volume IV, Issue 49 [IMAGE]     Email : info@otcjournal.com   URL : http://www.otcjournal.com    To OTC Journal Members:     [IMAGE] Market Comment [IMAGE]  We are in a very listless market right now. The NASDAQ has given back the 300 point gain it enjoyed from the last 1/2 point surprise rate cut from the FED. Every time the NASDAQ looks at 2000, it runs back up like a hooked fish when it first sees the fisherman's boat. Many technicians believe the NASDAQ needs to trade into the 1900 to 1950 range before it can move on to higher ground.   Microcaps are drifting down on light volume, reaching low risk entry points which will seem cheap when the next volume surge takes them back up. We are entering Earnings Pre-Warning season, a new 21st century phenomenon created by our litigious society.   Many fund managers are waiting to pounce on beaten down technology stocks as they sell off when earnings warnings are issued. Everyone's buying cheap now, positioning for what might be one of the most prolific 4th quarters of all time in stocks.   Now would be a great time to review the trading strategies for accumulating on dips we shared with you in our May 12th edition . Click Here , and read the first section.   Two of our featured companies have been in the news this week, and here's an update for you on both:      [IMAGE] XML Global Technologies (OTC BB: XMLG) Featured in Investor's Business Daily   Thusday, May 12th's edition of the venerable Investor's Business Daily carried an article in the Internet & Technology Section, authored by Sarah Z. Sleeper entitled "U.N Group OKs 'Language' That Could Spur E-Business".   The article mentions that the U.N.'s group OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) has announced the specific International standards for programming with ebXML.   Long term readers know one of our featured companies, XML Global Technologies has been developing programming tools for this new and revolutionary programming language which is expected to become the new International Standard by which all computer systems communicate with each other.   XML Global is mentioned in the article along with Sun Microsystems, IBM, and Oracle. Here are several excerpts:   "With little fanfare, the e-conomy received what might prove to have been a pretty good jolt."  (first paragraph) "It's backed (ebXML) by a bevy of tech heavy-hitters. They include Sun Microsystems, Inc., IBM Corp. and Oracle Corp." (5th paragraph) "The biggest win is going to be for the average consumer, said David Weber, as vice president at Vancouver B.C.- based software firm XML Global Technologies, Inc. EbXML will reduce costs for companies." (11th paragraph)  The article goes on to describe recent international demonstrations of the product where XML Global participated along with Bea Systems, Commerce One, and Sun Microsystems.   Clearly XML Global Technologies has placed itself directly in the path on an oncoming tidal wave of new programming opportunities, and is the David in a team of Goliaths headed towards the adoption of ebXML.    Rarely are microcap stocks prominently mentioned in the company of such huge success stories. XML Global has a tiger by the tail.   The stock has drifted back on light volume to the $.90 range. You should have a look at it down here.   We are trying to get permission to reprint the entire article for the benefit of our members. We may have it in PDF Format by the middle of next week. Stand by for more information.     [IMAGE] Envoy Communications, Inc (NASDAQ: ECGI) Announces March Quarterly Earnings [IMAGE]  This past Tuesday after the market closed Envoy announced its 21st Consecutive Quarter of Year-Over-Year Growth in Revenue and EBITDA. This company is putting on a remarkable corporate performance in a hostile business climate.   Here are the quarter to quarter comparisons: (all figures are in Canadian Dollars)       March Quarter 2000 March Quarter 2001 Percentage Increase Revenues $12,938,527 $20,430,030 57% EBIDTA Earnings $2,135,919 $3,074,254 44% Earnings Before Non-Cash Expenses $857,286 $1,282,121 49% EPS Fully Diluted .03 .03 0%    Investors should note that the company's sales were up 57% over the same quarter the previous year to $20,430,030. Real, after tax cash earnings increased 49% to $1,282,121. EPS stays the same due primarily to non-cash expenses. The accounting standards for these non-cash expenses are changing this summer to accurately reflect the company's financial performance.   The editors of the OTC Journal continue to believe this stock is worth $5 per share US. Yet, it continues to languish in the high $2 range due to complete lack of sponsorship from Wall Street. The OTC Journal is the only substantive forum for investment ideas that follows this company.   Now that the market is turning, management recognizes it is time to go to Wall Street and present itself to the institutional community if it ever hopes to create a significant result on behalf of long suffering shareholders.   Patience should pay off for investors. Wall Street will eventually discover this company because Wall Street loves profits again. This is a low risk growth stock to accumulate on dips. Their history of profitability mitigates many of the risk factors associated with micro cap investing, and investors will eventually come along that want this stock.    The OTC Journal is a proud partner of the SwingWire.com Online Investment Community . A next generation Online Analyst Exchange providing Members the ability to search, review, track and monitor some of the Internet's best Online CAs (CyberAnalysts). Members have the opportunity to potentially achieve higher returns by viewing top performing portfolios and receiving real-time alerts from favorite CAs.    SwingWire.com  also has a lucrative incentive model for experienced investors and traders who consistently outperform the market. Share market ideas with other like-minded investors, establish a proven track record, provide insightful commentary, attract followers and ultimately become one of the Internet's highest paid and most sought after CyberAnalysts!    Click here to receive your FREE 30-Day Trial Membership with no further obligation. Sign Up Today!        Disclaimer   The OTCjournal.com Newsletter is an independent electronic publication committed to providing our readers with factual information on selected  publicly traded companies. All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other pertinent criteria with a view toward  maximizing the upside potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.  Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from certain of the companies which it features.  Likewise, this newsletter is owned by MarketByte, LLC.  To the degrees enumerated herein,  this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent publication.   Click Here  to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered, or visit the following web address:  http://www.otcjournal.com/disclaimer.html  for our full profiles and http://www.otcjournal.com/trading-alerts/disclaimer.html  for Trading Alerts. MarketByte LLC has been paid the following fee by XML Global for a year of representation: $100,000 cash, 60,000 shares of free trading stock, 60,000 shares of restricted stock, and 60,000 options exercisable at $2. The 60,000 shares of free trading stock have been contributed by a third party on behalf of the company. Please review our policy on selling shares found within our Mission Statement at our home page.   All statements and expressions are the sole  opinions of the editors and are subject to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities  mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein.   The editor, members of the editor's family, and/or entities with  which they are affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication.   The profiles, critiques, and other editorial content of the OTCjournal.com may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein.   THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN  SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN  CONSENT OF THE EDITORS OF OTCjournal.com.   We encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites of  the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com . We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at  http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm . Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at its web site.     Unsubscribe Here     You can unsubscribe from this list at any time by Clicking Here  and HITTING SEND. If you are having difficulty removing yourself or wish to change your address please go to http://listserv.otcjournal.com/opt.cgi?email=alewis@ect.enron.com .

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

  ---
You are currently subscribed to otcjournal as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-otcjournal-1163964L@lyris.otcjournal.com


This look ok?  It will be presented to Dave Duran to execute Monday am unless
you suggest otherwise.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 05:42
PM ---------------------------

"Pedigo, Doug" <DPedigo@INTERGEN.com> on 05/18/2001 01:39:24 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: CA re energy management services

Thanks.? I have changed the party to the parent of the two entities in
question and put the project particulars in the introductory paragraph.?
Otherwise, all of your changes were fine.? You can go ahead and have the
agreement executed and fax or send over.

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Pedigo, Doug
Subject: CA re energy management services

Doug,

Here's the revised CA.? I highlighted the changed terms.? In addition, I
deleted the prior paragraph 11 which said that the agreement supercedes a
prior CA.

I don't know if the InterGen indentity and signatory are the same,? but
obviously I left that for you to determine.? I expect that the Enron entity
which will bid will be EPMI, so I used that entity.

(See attached file: InterGen North America CA may 18.doc)

I beefed up the definition of confidential information due to the
complexity of the issues, and I added 6 months to? the term since things
won't get cranked up for a while.

I look forward to talking to you at your convenience.? Have a good weekend.

Kay

?
 - InterGen North America CA may 18.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
04:51 PM ---------------------------

azminab@petronas.com.my on 02/02/2001 01:54:20 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com, rex.w.bennett@usa.conoco.com,
gavin.watson@riskmetrics.com, jsahp@ms.com, tom.doo@gs.com
cc: azminab@petronas.com.my
Subject: Benchmarking

Gentlemen

 Please provide an LCD projector or overhaed projector for our short
presentation.

Regards

 DISCLAIMER  : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("Message")
 is  intended  only  for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
 contain  confidential  information.   You  are hereby notified that the
 taking  of  any action in reliance upon, or any review, retransmission,
 dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or any
 part thereof by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
 prohibited.  If  you  have  received  this Message in error, you should
 delete this Message immediately and advise the sender by return e-mail.
 Opinions, conclusions and other information in this Message that do not
 relate  to  the official business of PETRONAS or its Group of Companies
 shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by PETRONAS or any of
 the companies within the Group.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30630.pcx)
 - pic30630.pcx


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Forgot to send the darned thing to you!  Sorry.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 09:04 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/10/2001 05:28 PM

		 To: hgovenar@govadv.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com,
skean@enron.com, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Hearing in Boise

Greetings:

Sue Landwehr will be sending around a more comprehensive summary of what
happened at today's FERC hearnig in Boise but asked me to pass along the
following.

Each state was only allowed to have two people at the table.  For California
it was Assembly Speaker Hertzberg and Geoff Brown (newly appointed CA PUC
Commissioner).

Hertzberg did a credible, matter-of-fact job of explaining what California's
doing to resolve the crisis (nice to know that there's someone out there who
can explain what the heck California's doing).  Hertzberg then asked that
FERC do "its part" by imposing price caps in Western wholesale markets.

Hertzberg didn't mention the PG&E bankruptcy or Davis' deal with Edison.

Overall, the "no price cap" message won the day (though Breathitt seems to be
under considerable pressure to give in to caps).

The Governor of Arizona (Jane Hull) had a staffer deliver a letter signed by
9 republicant governors opposing price caps.  Sue will be distributing the
letter.

Best,
Jeff


Brad this file is also located in the O: drive.  Stfin/Accounting/.

Thanks.

Dana


I didn't make tooo many changes.  Take a look at Florida and Koch.


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 8;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012308.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


It's muster - to pass inspection...(how does mustard make sense?  It's not
like the Grey Poupon commercials.)

                     Main Entry: 1mus?ter
                     Pronunciation: 'm&s-t&r
                     Function: noun
                     Etymology: Middle English mustre, from Middle French
mostre,
                     monstre, from monstrer
                     Date: 14th century
                     1 : a representative specimen : SAMPLE
                     2 a : an act of assembling; specifically : formal
military inspection b :
                     critical examination c : an assembled group : COLLECTION
d :
                     INVENTORY

Get some rest, it's probably pretty easy to catch a cold with the damp, cold
weather there.

Susan


You are scheduled to attend the EnronAnywhere Portal Project Meeting.
When:   Wednesday, April 18, 2001
Where: EB50M Dining Room
Time:    12:00 - 4:00
Lunch will be served.
Thank you in advance for helping us to create ONE Enron.  Your attendance and
participation is certain to make this project a huge success.
Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Marie Hejka
EnronAnywhere
3 9698

P.S.  Note, we decided not to send a pre-workshop assignment.
See you there.


Tana,
It was a pleasure speaking with you today. Attached is our company
information and the candidate we spoke
about.
Please give me your feedback.
Thank you

Michael W Fuchs
Managing Partner
Sales Consultants of Hunterdon County
33 Main Street, Clinton, NJ, 08809
(908) 735-0250 (tel)
(908) 735-6322 (fax)
mfuchs@schunterdon.com (E-mail)

 - marketing office 2.doc
 - Debbie Ramkerrysingh.doc


We have received a proposed assignment from PPL Corporation to PPL Energy
Plus, LLC wherein they would like to assign their financial transactions
(two), any guaranty relating thereto (do we have one covering financial?),
and any master agreement (we have no financial agreement with them).  Is this
OK with Credit?  I am having a copy of the assignment walked down to you.  If
someone else is going to approve this, let me know.


Rod

Thank you for the introduction.

For my part I am responsible for finance & Regulation at Wessex

Our work over the next month is to set out the heads of terms of contracts
between the regulated asset company and the new unregulated service company.

Attached is a note we have prepared setting out payment principles.  You
will see initial thoughts on issues such as who has what risk.

In considering this it may be useful to note some important points about the
UK Water industry, viz
1    The Licence holder (asset company) retains ultimate responsibility -
and criminal liability - for service delivery
2    The UK industry is very political and hence loose contracts are
necessary to deal with unexpected events.
3    The regulatory reporting requirements are very detailed & will require
annual information on the costs of both the Licence holder & (probably) the
service company

On the timing of your vist I am trying to arrange a tour of Wessex & its
assets for Thursday and or Friday next week.  You can also discuss some of
the issues on the contracts with the in house team.  unfortunatly I have
meeting with the regulator on the Thursday & am tied up much of Friday - but
it is probably better for you to spend time with people doing the  real work
rather than me.

Monday can be used for our meeting with the lawyers.  This will probably be
later in the day and go on into the evening.

I will get you a more detailed itinerary soon.

with best regards

Keith

cc John

-----Original Message-----
From: rhaysle@enron.com <rhaysle@enron.com>
To: kharris@azurix.com <kharris@azurix.com>; lgawith@azurix.com
<lgawith@azurix.com>; kwillett@azurix.com <kwillett@azurix.com>
Cc: cskellett@azurix.com <cskellett@azurix.com>; jale@azurix.com
<jale@azurix.com>
Date: 28 June 2000 23:58
Subject: Introduction

>Name:      Rod Hayslett
>Phone:         713-853-6178
>Location:      Houston (Enron Building  - EB4054)
>FAX:           713-646-3708
>EMAIL:         rhaysle@enron.com (or whatever you see as the address to
>this message)
>Background:    20 + years trying to figure out how to make something a lot
>more than a regulated return out of a regulated              business.
>10+ years in the US Navy, reaching the rank of Captain.     Experience in
>Finance, Accounting,               Information Systems and Administrative
>Areas.     Currently have Commercial responsibilty over some
>telecommunications startup services companies relating to Rights of Way and
>fiber optic line rights and              coordinating responsibilities over
>the Pipeline Market Services Area.
>
>Current Job:   CFO of Enron's Gas Pipeline Group. (which means here,
>whatever the boss wants tackled next)
>Home Phone:    281-292-2467
>
>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the Wessex Water IT Support Centre on:

44-1225-732088 or email support@wessexwater.co.uk

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

 - STRUCTURE OF CONTRACTS (4).doc


In addition to World Markets Energy information  <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket.asp>
 and Country Analysis and Forecasting, <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_CountryAnalysis.asp>

eSource now offers free access to World Markets - Regulatory Analysis

World Markets Regulatory Analysis offers:

		Daily Reports - Legal, regulatory and policy developments in 185 countries. Comprehensive monitoring of legislative, regulatory and policy
 			changes for each country
		Email Alerts -  Automatic daily email alerts of current and impending legal, regulatory and policy changes affecting the development of markets
		Daily Analysis - Same-day in-depth assessment of the impact of legal developments by in-house analysts. Features detailed analysis of key legal
			changes written exclusively for Regulatory Analysis by a unique network of legal experts in more than 180 countries
		Country Reports - Assessments of the legal systems in 185 countries, including rules on establishing a business and restrictions on foreign investors

		Access World Markets Regulatory Analysis:  http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_regulatory.asp

										***

		For additional new products and reports, visit eSource's Hot Topics page at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp


Advanced Technology and 10 Free Online Equity Trades+

Dear Keith, A Holst,

As an active trader, you know that having the tools you need to trade
is essential in today's market. So, when you open an account with
Datek, you'll have access to real-time market information, the ability
to customize your trading screen and direct access trading.
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1158766X84234X

See how you can take advantage of what Datek has to offer:

    ?   One Low Commission - just $9.99: Datek is the only online
        broker that gives you one simple low commission for both
        market and limit orders for any online equity trade up to
        5,000 shares.

    ?   FREE Streamer(R) 3.0 Quote Service**. With Streamer Real-Time
        Quotes you have access to customized quotes and charts that
        show you the movements of any stock in real time.

    ?   FREE Level II Quotes and Real-Time Charts***. Our Streamer(R)
        Level II Quotes provide a complete picture of the real-time
        momentum of any Nasdaq stock, by showing you the top 15 bids
        and offers from all ECN's and Market Centers.

    ?   New: Customize your own Trading Site. What do YOU want to
        see on screen? Datek offers three floating windows that let
        you enter direct access orders faster, store your orders for
        the right moment, and watch your account balance update in
        real time.

    ?   FREE access to Datek Direct(SM)?. Control the routing of your
        Nasdaq orders with direct access - without paying higher
        commissions. And unlike other online brokers, Datek does not
        charge you for ECN fees.

    ?   FREE Real-Time Screener??. Find stock opportunities that fit
        your investment strategy by matching criteria you input with
        real-time performance information.

    ?   Fast Trade Execution*. If your marketable online equity
        order isn't executed within 60 seconds, Datek will waive
        the commission.

If you act now, you can also capitalize on a limited-time offer for 10
free online equity trades+. Just open an account by depositing or
transferring $500 or more before December 31, 2001. Please be sure to
include the offer code AZZ when filling out your application.
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1158766X84234X

Take advantage of this limited time offer - and Datek's free tools for
active traders - by opening an account today.

Sincerely,

Ed Nicoll
Chairman and CEO
Datek Online Holdings Corp.
www.datek.com

P.S. Do you have questions about opening a Datek account? Please
contact Datek Customer Support at support@datek.com or call us at
1-800-U2-DATEK (1-800-823-2835) from 8 AM to midnight ET on weekdays,
and from 9 AM to 7 PM ET on weekends.

Our Privacy Policy:
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1154847X84234X
Legal & Disclosure Notice:
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1154848X84234X
Customer Agreement:
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1154850X84234X

+ Open and fund an account with a minimum initial deposit of $500
before 12/31/01 and get 10 commission-free online equity trades,
up to 5,000 shares for each trade per account. Free trade credits
will expire within one year of issue date if not used. Limit one
new account offer per type of account. Offer cannot be combined with
other offers.

* Datek will not charge a commission ($9.99) for any marketable online
order that is not executed within 60 seconds, measured from the time
that "processing" began until the time the order is "executed". This
applies to all orders using Datek's "Auto Routing" for any NYSE, AMEX,
or NASD stock that are marketable after 9:45 A.M. ET, are marketable
upon entry and remain marketable for 60 seconds. The market in the
stock must not be locked, crossed or halted. We do not extend this
commitment to short sales, OTC Bulletin Board Stocks, Option Trades,
or any order that is "stopped" at a price improvement, or during
Extended-Hours trading sessions.

** Real-time quote privileges differ for professional users. Datek
account holders must maintain a minimum account value of $500 to
receive this free service.

*** Level II quotes on the Streamer(R) brand real-time quotation
service are available free for those who trade more than 20 times a
month and maintain a minimum account balance of $500 with Datek.
Nonprofessional users who trade 20 or fewer times per month can access
Level II quotes for $9.99 per month, while professional users can have
access for $50 per month.

? Datek Direct(SM) is a tool, as the name implies, that allows
customers to direct their Nasdaq orders to a specific execution venue.
The name should not be deemed to imply that a customer is dealing
directly with the marketplace. All orders are processed through Datek
Online Financial Services LLC, a registered broker/dealer.

?? Use the link below to read Datek's 3rd Party Research Disclosure Notice
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1154846X84234X

Streamer(R) is a registered trademark of Datek Online Holdings Corp.

High volumes of trading and volatility may result in executions at
prices significantly away from the price quoted or displayed at the
time of order entry.

This e-mail is just one of the ways that we keep you and other
Datek account holders up-to-date about product and service
innovations and beta testing at Datek. These communications
may also spotlight special incentives that we hope will motivate
you to consider trying something new at Datek. Please let us know
if you'd prefer that these e-mails not continue.
http://datek2.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4872500825X1154851X84234Xkholst%40enron.com

System response and access times may vary due to market conditions,
system performance and other factors.

? 2001 Datek Online Financial Services LLC, Member NASD/SIPC

CC-18 / #84234


OJ for President!

	"John Miriam Kartozian" <jamkartozian@jps.net>
	11/29/2000 07:45 PM

		 To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Hornswoggled & Bamboozled

I thought they were the prosecution team at the OJ trial.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 04:25 PM -----

	"CARL EKLUND" <CEKLUND@LLGM.COM>
	04/19/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Close out of contracts

Richard,

Has the call been scheduled?  If so, please advise of dial in information.
Thank you.

>>> <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com> 04/19/01 10:54AM >>>

I have asked my asst, Twanda Sweet, to set up a conf. call on this for
Friday. Jim is right--we need to be prepared for anything. Bill- I heard
today that PG&E has sent us a letter or otherwise communicated to us that
they are looking for a letter from us on valuation and are going to
challenge our setoffs. Any news?

                    "JAMES
                    HUEMOELLER"          To:     "Elizabeth Sager"
<elizabeth.sager@enron.com>,
                    <JLHUEMOE@LLG        richard.b.sanders@enron.com,
travis.mccullough@enron.com
                    M.COM>               cc:     "CARL A. EKLUND"
<CEKLUND@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN KLAUBERG"

<JKLAUBER.NYC2.HEADQUARTERS#032#NEW#032#YORK@LLGM.COM>
                    04/17/2001           Subject:     Close out of contracts
                    03:00 PM

I don't want to make a pest of myself, but I'm curious as to how the
process of closing out the terminated contracts is coming.  In particular
has Enron completed the process of obtaining quotes so that the amount of
the Termination Payments is set.  I'm concerned that PG&E would be more
likely to hit the LC's once the amounts have been set.  We'll be ready to
file something if they try that, but I'd like a heads up so that we know
the possibility is out there.

==============================================================================

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).
If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


Congratulations Jeff!  And great pictures - big brother looks a bit happier
than the last time I saw him.

Mark


Subject: Energy Market Report - 1/28/02

Energy Market Report
Monday, January 28, 2002

*See attached pdf file.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
January 28, 2002 for January 29, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     18.80     -2.95      22.00    -0.50
Mid-Columbia      18.80     -2.95      22.00    -0.50
COB               21.00     -2.25      22.25    -2.50
N. California     23.50     -1.50      25.00    -1.50
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA         NA       NA
S. California     23.00     -2.00      25.00    -2.00
Mead              22.75     -2.50      25.75    -1.25
Palo Verde        22.75     -0.75      25.75     0.00
Inland SW         19.50     -4.00      25.75    -1.25
4-Corners         23.00     -1.50      24.50    -1.50
Central Rockies   22.00      0.25      26.00     3.25
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     17.25     -3.75      18.50    -3.50
Mid-Columbia      17.25     -3.75      18.50    -3.50
COB               17.00     -2.00      18.00    -4.00
N. California     16.75     -4.75      19.50    -4.00
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA         NA       NA
S. California     17.00     -4.00      19.00    -4.00
Mead              17.50     -3.50      19.50    -3.50
Palo Verde        14.00     -3.75      16.50    -4.00
Inland SW         13.50     -4.25      16.50    -6.50
4-Corners         14.50     -4.50      16.50    -4.00
Central Rockies   11.50     -4.50      13.50    -6.00
_________________________________________________________
Enron-omic Stimulus?

Despite the continuing grip of a cold snap, and a rash of unit outages over
the weekend, most Western power prices for Tuesday delivery ended slightly
weaker in the first trading session of the new week.  "Flows are up and
hydro's cheap," explained one marketer of the weather's inability to inject
strength into Western markets.  "If the weather weren't as cold as it is,
the market could even be worse for sellers."  As usual over the past few
months, references to Enron were peppered across the mainstream media on
Monday.  UBS Warburg, the Swiss bank that is in the process of purchasing
the now-defunct EnronOnLine, plans to have the trading business in full
operation by the end of February.  To staff the reborn operation, UBS
Warburg has offered contracts to about 625 of EnronOnLine's 800 former
employees.  The transaction is still pending the approval of various federal
agencies.  In another chapter of the Enron saga, Vice Chairman J. Clifford
Baxter's death was ruled a suicide by Harris County Medical Examiner Joye
Carter on Saturday.  Baxter was considered an important potential witness in
the Enron affair after whistle-blower Sherron Watkins cited his discussion
with then-CEO Jeff Skilling about the company's dubious accounting
practices.  A suicide note was found at the scene, but the details of the
note have not yet been released.  Equally serious are allegations made by
Rep. Henry Waxman of California, indicating that the White House had
apparently changed the contents of a draft energy proposal circulated
through Congress in March of last year to add a provision that specifically
aided Enron Corp. in India.  According to Rep. Waxman, "the provision
appears to have been added to the plan during the period in which the White
House directly controlled the drafting."  The Bush Administration has
understandably tried to distance itself from their biggest political
contributor, denying that its energy plan was crafted to help Enron.  In
related news, GAO head David M. Walker will likely sue Vice President Dick
Cheney for refusing to turn over documents relating to the VP's meetings
with Enron representatives last year.  It would mark the first time the
investigative arm of Congress sued another branch of the government for refu
sal to cooperate with an inquiry.  The Vice President insisted that the GAO
was overstepping its bounds. "Their jurisdiction extends to agencies created
by statute. That's not me," asserted Cheney, "I'm a constitutional officer.
And the authority of the GAO does not extend in that case to my office."
Save it for the judge, Dick.  In gas news, NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas
futures fell hard in Monday trading, with the February contract losing 12.9
cents to settle at 1.908$/mmBtu, and the March contract close behind,
plummeting 12 cents to close at 1.984$/mmBtu.

Heavy load energy prices in the Northwest fell almost 2$/MWh on the low end
for Tuesday delivery.  Healthy hydro flows and a cold front that did not
quite live up to its prediction took the brunt of the blame.  Peak goods at
Mid-Columbia changed hands from 18.8 to 22$/MWh on Monday.  Flows at Chief
Joseph remained as strong as ever this year, coming in at 110 kcfs Tuesday,
105 kcfs Wednesday and Thursday, 100 kcfs Friday, 85 kcfs Saturday, 65 kcfs
Sunday, and 110 kcfs next Monday.  Temperatures were predicted to remain
well below normal through Friday, with lows expected to flirt with freezing.
The latest six-to-ten likewise called for temperatures to remain near to
below normal from February 3 to 7.  There were no new unit outages to report
on Monday.

Despite cold weather and a modest rise in natural gas values at the Socal
border, day-ahead electricity prices softened in the Golden State on Monday.
Heavy load goods lost about 2$/MWh everywhere, while light load prices took
a bigger hit, slipping almost 4$/MWH.  Peak power at SP15 traded between 23
and 25$/MWh, with the bulk of deals done closer to the high end, above
24.25$/MWh. In California politicking, the CPUC voted to reject a compromise
put forth by SDG&E parent Sempra Energy.  The proposal would have used $219
million of the $363 million earned selling power from five-year contracts at
wholesale prices last summer to pay down the balancing account, and thus
benefiting SDG&E rate payers, while allocating the remaining $144 million to
shareholders.  The CPUC said they think the courts will award a higher
number to the balancing account. Californians may soon be allowed to choose
their power provider again, if CPUC administrative law judge Robert Barnett
has his way.  The initiative, a cornerstone of the 1996 deregulation bill,
was revoked September 20, 2001.  However, consumers would have to hurry
their selection, as the option would be back in play for a limited time,
through July 1, 2002.  Barnett said competitive choice was essential to keep
utility customers from unfairly footing the bill for last year's energy
crisis.  On the generation front, Morro Bay #4 (336 MW) and Pittsburg #7
(682 MW) returned to service over the weekend.  Helms PGP #1 (407 MW) joined
sister unit #2 (407 MW) in the out of service category on Monday.  Alamitos
#3 (320 MW) exited the grid on January 26.  Hydro Big Creek (1,020 MW) was
derated, operating at 720 MW.  Sutter Plants (546 MW) was generating at 270
MW.  Tuesday forecasts called for temperatures to linger almost 10 degrees
below normal, with highs in the upper-40s to mid-50s across the state.  The
latest six-to-ten predicted below-normal temperatures from February 3 to 7.

The Southwest was a slight exception to the conditions prevalent across the
WSCC on Monday.  While temperatures were lower than on Friday, peak power
prices remained mostly flat.  Heavy load pieces at Palo Verde traded between
22.75 and 25.75$/MWh, a loss of 75 cents on the low end and no change on the
high.  Temperatures were expected to linger well below normal through
Friday, and the latest six-to-ten predicted likewise from February 3 to 7.
In unit news, coal-fired Navajo #3 (750 MW) returned to the grid Monday
morning, while the ETR for Coronado #1 (395 MW) was revised to early morning
Tuesday, January 29.  Fellow coal unit Huntington #2 (455 MW) also climbed
back onto the grid over the weekend after repairing a tube leak.

David Ramberg and Jessie Norris
_________________________________________________________

Western Generating Unit Outages

Current                            Begins          Ends          Reason
CAISO units <250/7145 total          NA             NA
planned/unplanned*
Alamitos #3/320/gas               26-Jan-02         ?            planned*
Alamitos #6/480/gas               20-Jan-02         ?            planned
Big Creek Project/1020/hydro      28-Jan-02         ?        @710MW,
planned*
Colstrip #3/700/coal              11-Jan-02         ?            repairs
Corondado #1/395/coal             25-Jan-02     29-Jan-02        tube leak*
Encina #4/303/gas                 12-Jan-02         ?            unplanned
Etiwanda #4/320/gas               21-Jan-02         ?            planned
Four Corners #5                   09-Jan-02     14-Mar-02 @392MW,
maintenance*
Grand Coulee #19/600/hydro        10-Dec-01       March          repairs
Haynes #6/341/gas                 07-Jan-02         ?            planned
Helms PGP #1/407/hydro            28-Jan-02         ?            planned*
Helms PGP #2/407/hydro            01-Oct-01         ?            planned
Hyatt/Thermalito/933/hydro        02-Oct-01         ?      @665 MW,
unplanned*
Moss Landing #7/739/gas           29-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #1/725/gas           28-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #2/750/gas           05-Oct-01         ?      @350 MW,
unplanned
Pittsburg #6/317/gas              22-Nov-01         ?            planned
Scattergood #3/445/gas            22-Jan-02         ?            maintenance
Sutter Plants/546/gas             28-Jan-02         ?      @270 MW,
unplanned*

Future
Navajo #2/750/coal                02-Feb-02     25-Feb-02        maintenance

For unit owners refer to pdf version.
*Indicates a change from previous EMR.
______________________________________________________________________

Eastern Markets Pre-Scheduled Firm Power Prices ($/MWh)

January 28, 2002 for January 29, 2002

Peak (Heavy) in $/MWh
                 Low     Change   High      Change
Into Cinergy    17.00    -0.20    18.50      0.50
Western PJM     20.95    -1.30    22.10     -0.40
Into Entergy    15.50    -1.40    18.00     -0.25
Into TVA        16.25    -0.50    17.50      0.40
ERCOT           17.00     0.00    17.50      0.25
___________________________________________________________
As unseasonably warm weather continued and traders harbored little hope of
an upside in the gas market, peak power prices remained mostly steady on
Monday across the Eastern Interconnect.  Traders reported light trading
volume and lots of sunshine outside their windows.  NYMEX Henry Hub natural
gas futures reached new contract lows on Monday, a familiar refrain heard
during the past week.  February lost 12.9 cents in its second to last
trading session, ending the day at 1.908$/mmBtu.  March plunged a similar 12
cents to close at 1.984$/mmBtu.

With a healthy generation landscape and temperatures more usual to late
spring blanketing the region, day-ahead peak electricity prices settled
lower in the Mid-Atlantic on Monday.  Western PJM goods for Tuesday delivery
changed hands between 20.95 and 22.1$/MWh, with most deals done in the 21.05
to 21.5$/MWh range.  Balance of the week trades were heard around 21.7$/MWh,
while balance of the month deals went through near 23.4$/MWh.  Despite an
unusual brief spike to 73$/MWh just after 13:00 EST, LMPs were averaging
21.26$/MWh through 15:00 EST.  Traders reported lackluster trading and no
new outages on Monday.  Tuesday forecasts called for high temperatures to
linger in the balmy 63 to 68 degree range across PJM, before cooling about 5
degrees on Wednesday.  The most current six-to-ten predicted normal
temperatures from February 3 to 7.

Despite record highs near 60 degrees and more of the same expected for
Tuesday, heavy load energy costs were flat to slightly higher in the Midwest
on Monday.  Into Cinergy deals for Tuesday delivery were heard between 17
and 18.5$/MWh, with the bulk of transactions from 17.75 to 18$/MWh.  Most
traders were surprised by the relative strength of the Cinergy hub.  "I
suspect there are quite a few coal units turned off, and most maintenance
schedules have been pushed forward, since the generation clearly isn't
needed," commented one ECAR trader.  In unit news, Quad Cities #1 (821 MW)
remained down for pump support maintenance.  Sources said they expected
sister unit #2 (821 MW) to be taken off-line for the same repairs when #1
returned to the grid, possibly as soon as this week.  The south shore of
Lake Erie, a region where January snow is usually measured in feet, enjoyed
high temperatures in the low-60s on Monday and anticipated the same on
Tuesday.  Indeed, all of ECAR expected similar conditions for Tuesday, while
cooling into the upper-40s was forecast for Wednesday.  The latest
six-to-ten called for normal temperatures from February 3 to 7.

As weak weather-related demand dominated SERC and Texas, peak power prices
weakened on Monday.  Into Entergy deals were done between 15.5 and 18$/MWh,
with the low end reached late in the day.  "I don't see any possibility of a
rally for February.  Gas was hammered again today; the market is very soft
right now," commented one SERC realist.  Tuesday was expected to see high
temperatures solidly in the 70s across SERC and Texas, with slight cooling
predicted as the week progresses.  The most current six-to-ten called for
normal temperatures from February 3 to 7.
___________________________________________________________

California ISO Congestion Index in $/MWh

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 27-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             1.25     3.75
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 28-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 29-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00    52.75
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

OTC Forward Peak Electricity Contracts in $/MWh

                    Mid-C              PV              SP-15
                Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask
BOM            20.00    21.00    22.50    23.50    23.00    24.00
February       17.00    18.50    21.00    22.00    22.50    23.50
March          15.00    16.50    20.75    21.75    21.50    22.50
April          16.00    17.50      NA       NA       NA       NA
Q2 '02         15.75    17.25    24.00    25.00    23.50    24.50
Q3 '02         29.50    31.00    37.00    38.00    36.50    37.50
Q4 '02         27.00    28.50    26.50    27.50    28.25    29.25
Q1 '03         27.50    29.00      NA       NA       NA       NA
Cal '03        28.75    30.25    32.00    33.00    33.50    34.50

Represents the most recent bid/ask spread obtainable
by the Energy Market Report.

Alberta Power Pool Index (C$/MWh)

                    Peak(14)   Peak(16)   Off-Peak    Flat     Change
for  25-Jan-02       37.57      37.27      16.23      30.95    -3.26
for  26-Jan-02       23.80      22.52      11.86      19.17     0.00
for  27-Jan-02       25.82      24.32      11.45      20.25     0.00

BPA's Offer for 01/30/02.

Hours        Amount          NW delivered        COB/NOB delivered
7-22         200MW           Market Price*          Market Price*

*Market price will be determined at time of request.

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures in $/mmBtu

                 Close        Change
        Feb      1.908        -0.129
        Mar      1.984        -0.120

Natural Gas Spot Prices in $/mmBtu

                  Low          High
Sumas             2.02         2.07
So. Cal Border    2.05         2.10
San Juan          1.92         1.97
__________________________________________________________

Economic Insight, Inc. - 3004 SW First, Portland, Oregon 97201,
Telephone (503) 222-2425, Internet e-mail emr@econ.com -
Copyright, Economic Insight, Inc. 2002.


Are you still attending these meetings?

Stacey