Tom Swank, the originator and I sat down with Bruce Golden and went through
the porject cost numbers for the GE 7FA combined cycle facility.  At this
point we need to claculate FOM and VOM and other operating expenses.  We feel
pretty good about the project cost numbers.  Let me know if you need more
info than I have already given you.  Bruce Golden has the soft copy of the
project cost numbers.  Thanks
Ben


comments to the swap docuemnts
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 08:41 AM -----

	"Ruth Schonfeld" <Ruth.Schonfeld@macleoddixon.com>
	09/21/2000 05:56 AM

		 To: <Dpef@blakes.com>, <warren.nishimura@blakes.com>,
<brian.kerrigan@enron.com>, <clement.abrams@enron.com>,
<derek.davies@enron.com>, <greg.johnstone@enron.com>,
<peter.keohane@enron.com>, <sara.shackleton@enron.com>,
<soma.ghosh@enron.com>, <tana.jones@enron.com>,
<blair.fleming@royalbank.com>, <ian.mcarthur@royalbank.com>,
<tracy.ross@royalbank.com>, <bpechersky@velaw.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Attached Files from Rick Borden

 - MACLEOD-.DOC
 - MACLEOD-.DOC


I got a tee time for 12:24 on Sunday.

Chris


Please plan to attend the a meeting re: Technical Risk on September 18, 2000
@  2:00 pm in  3321

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me @ 3-0643

Kay  3-0643


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


Here is the info:
Bank:   Compass Bank
Transit #: 113 010 547
Account #: 0600 1564
For credit to the account of Roderick J. and Kathleen R. Hayslett

Thanks.   I would like this done as soon as possible as I will be needing the
funds at the end of the week.
Rod Hayslett

"Erik Solis" <erik.solis@painewebber.com> on 09/06/2000 01:18:56 PM
To: "'Rod.Hayslett@enron.com'" <Rod.Hayslett@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: confidential

unfortunately, i do not have those instructions in my files. could you please
offer them again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rod.Hayslett@enron.com [SMTP:Rod.Hayslett@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:23 AM
To: Erik Solis
Subject: Re: confidential

Do you still have the instructions for the wire to Compass Bank in the
files?   I would like it wired there.

"Erik Solis" <erik.solis@painewebber.com> on 09/01/2000 10:07:37 AM

To:   "'rhaysle@enron.com'" <rhaysle@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  confidential

Rod,
we executed those shares yesterday at 85.1875.
call when you need me to wire.
Erik


Craig, - In addition, it is our understanding that the ISO has not cut
transmission capacity to Southern California, although that action would have
the same effect as cutting transmission to the north.

Jim - I have forwarded this information to Paul & Alan so they can pursue
this issue with the Governors.  Could we also give this information to
Clearing Up, if they promised not to quote us?  Do you think that would be
helpful?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 10:46 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
01/26/2001 10:26 AM
To: craiggannett@dwt.com
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, csandhe@enron.com, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: COB Exports denied

From an operational perspective, during a Stage 3 Emergencies, the ISO has
three options available to keep the lights on.   It can (1) buy more power
(under its DOE granted Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power
transactions, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export power from
its system.  The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero transmission
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users can't get
capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that the ISO
gets cheaper power over customers in the NW.

I was thinking of a political approach to solving this problem.  I was
wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to
write a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get
Steve Wright to sign on given that this  situation must make it more
difficult for him to balance his budget.

The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there
would be if BPA engaged in such actions and that California is simply  trying
to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.  It could also point out
that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's
Section 202(c) orders to get the power it needs for an emergency and that
this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and
reasonable rate determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.  I wouldn't
bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.  I don't
think we want to encourage that.

What do you think?  Call me.


<<World hunger Override Letter.DOC>>
 Attached for you review is a draft of the World Hunger Override
Letter.
 - World hunger Override Letter.DOC


FYI.  Thought you might be interested in seeing this.  Hope all is well.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietz, Rick
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Scott, Donna; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Global Risk Management Operations Organization Announcement

  [Dietz, Rick]

FYI - You will see some familiar names in the Sally Beck organizational announcement that follows...

Sally Beck- (Managing Director Energy Operations)@ENRON
06/26/2001 05:00 PM

Sent by:	Enron Announcements@ENRON
To:	Global Risk Management Operations List
cc:	Richard Causey/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	Global Risk Management Operations Organization Announcement

I am pleased to announce the following changes in the Global Risk Management Operations organization:

Bob Hall will lead operations for Enron Americas. Bob previously served as one of the business controllers for gas operations for Enron Americas, with direct responsibility for Gas Logistics and Volume Management.  The leadership team reporting to Bob will include Peggy Hedstrom (Calgary Operations), Jeff Gossett ( U.S. Gas Risk and South America Operations), Stacey White (U.S. Power Risk), Leslie Reeves (U.S. Gas and Power Confirmations and Settlements), and Bob Superty (U.S. Gas Logistics).

Brent Price will continue to lead Operations for Enron Global Markets and fulfill his dual role as Chief Accounting Officer for Enron Global Markets.

I am very pleased to announce that Kevin Sweeney will lead Operations for Enron Industrial Markets.  Kevin brings to his new role extensive risk and operations experience from stints in our Houston, London and Singapore offices.  Kevin fills the role that was previously held by Brenda Herod, who will now report directly to Beth Apollo.

Beth Apollo will be the Operations Project Manager for the assimilation of EES Wholesale. This will include Deal Capture, Risk Analysis,  Confirmations, and Global Data functions which have been moved into EWS under Global Risk Management Operations.  Successfully leveraging the infrastructure to support the EES business plan will also require close coordination with Gas Logistics, Settlements and the Operational Analysis (OA) process, and Beth will actively coordinate operations efforts with these teams and the commercial teams.  I have asked Beth to project manage the effort to look for opportunities to streamline and improve systems, processes and controls, and to consider alignment, where it makes sense, with existing EWS processes.  Reporting to Beth will be Scott Mills, with a focus on Deal Capture, Risk Analysis and Confirmations, and  Brenda Herod, with a focus on invoicing control guidelines and reporting requirements.

Beth will also continue to manage the Global Services function, which includes the consolidated DPR process and Global Operations Standards, led by Shona Wilson, and the Global Data function which is lead by James Scribner.

Mike Jordan will continue to lead operations for Enron Europe, working closely with me and other EWS operations leads to insure the proliferation of best operational practices worldwide for Enron.

Thanks for your continued support especially in exploring and seizing commercial opportunities to strengthen our contributions to Enron.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


'Arry (calxa@aol.com), Lime Ex-splurt Extraordinaire, wrote:

[snipped]

>I highly recommend David Moore's book "The Roman Pantheon"
>very thorough research into the uses and development of Roman Cement....lime
>and clay/pozzolonic ash; the making and uses of lime in building.

>I find it almost impossible to put down

Why am I not surprised ?

I suspect that if someone were to build a town called Lime, make
everything in the town out of lime, provide only foods that have
some connection to lime and then bury the Limeys in lime when
they're dead, 'Arry would move to that town in a flash and think
that he had arrived in Paradise on Earth.

According to my v-a-a-a-ast network of spies, sneaks and sleuths,
this next issue of The Last Straw focusses on lime... and to no one's
surprise, will feature some of the musings/wisdom/experience of our
Master of Lime, 'Arry .

Those same spies/sneaks/sleuths tell me that the format of this
next issue is a departure from the norm and may be a Beeg Surprise
to some.

Me ?  My curiosity is piqued and am itchin' to see this Limey
issue of The Last Straw and if you are afflicted with the same and
do not yet subscribe, it may not be too late:

 thelaststraw@strawhomes.com
or www.strawhomes.com

--
Itchy


I think we should respond, but I am not quite sure what we should say...I
will read it.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/20/2001 07:24 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings---Getting rates secured for DWR

FYI.  Looks like Peace is rattling the CPUC's cage pretty well.  Let me know
if you'd like to respond and we can get Jeanne Bennet to throw something
together.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 07:22 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/20/2001 06:46 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings

In a letter to the Commission dated March 14, 2001, the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR) expressed its views concerning the
determination of the California Procurement Adjustment (CPA).? (Copy
attached.)
The ALJ has issued the attached ruling stating that he will consider DWR,s
concerns in issuing a draft decision implementing an interim CPA, and in
order  to so,?he has?modified the original schedule.? He will issue a  draft
decision as soon as practical.? In the interim, parties may file and  serve
comments focused solely on DWR,s letter no later than 5:00 p.m.  tomorrow.?
Nothing like giving folks lots of time to respond.? The  email from the CPUC
went out at 4:08 this afternoon.
?
Dan
 - CPUC01-#93188-v1-A0011038_et_al__DeUlloa_Ruling__.doc


Jay A. Vandenberg
Emissions Risk
Enron Global Markets
jay.vandenberg@enron.com <mailto:jay.vandenberg@enron.com>
713.345.7612
ECS 03603


I shall!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:28 PM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: RE: Monday

Keep me posted...have fun!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     RE: Monday
                    03/06/2001 04:27
                    PM

I am riding this weekend and will find out.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:24 AM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: RE: Monday

Good!  I thought I just had a checkup with Bikesport shortly before I
stopped riding.  I was just a little afraid I might need grease.

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     RE: Monday
                    03/06/2001 02:46
                    PM

Hey, FYI,

I took your bike by Bikesport on Saturday and was going to leave it and the
guy looked at it on the spot and said it looked to be in great condition.
He aired up the tires and all I need to do is get on it and ride it!!!

Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:10 AM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: Re: Monday

Offer still good.  How goes things with the new beau?  Also, thanks for the
cooked meats.  They were delicious!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     Monday
                    02/26/2001 12:08
                    PM

Morning, Glory,

Hope you are doing well and had a good weekend.

I am still considering the MS 150 and wanted to know if your offer is still
good for borrowing your bicycle.  If you have changed your mind, it is no
big deal.  Promise!

Patti


To all,

Please forward documents to EB2116c going forward.

Thanks,
Joe


Please see the following important stories.  It appears to be quickly
slipping through Davis' fingers.  May be useful to re-group a bit in light of
the following events.  In sum:

Most importantly, in today's Chronicle, it's reported that Davis' staff met
with key Democrats yesterday and lowered the boom.
DWR purchases likely to be about $25 billion and rates may have to go up by
100%.  (See attached story.)
Apparently, one of the big reasons that 8X got held up yesterday is because
Davis' own staff went to D leadership and said, "don't move 8X (a bill that
Davis was said to support) because the $10 billion cap on bonds won't work;
they need much more."
It appears that rate increases will now become part of the mix, whether Davis
likes it or not.
The staff alleged that they were conveying the information before Davis had
been informed of the "bombshell."
Davis was criticized for being at yet another fund-raiser yesterday while the
situation significantly deteroriated in Sacramento.  (See attached story.)
Meanwhile, PG&E has sued--or may be about to sue--the State, saying they
won't pay the QFs according to Davis' plan (which the PUC is supposed to
implement on Tuesday).  (See attached PG&E press release.)
Finally, Mike Kahn has issued an opinion piece in yesterday's Chronicle, in
which he attempts to lump together into one pile Republicans, market
proponents, price gougers and Texans, and defending Davis and Lynch.

******************************************************************************
***********************************************************************
Davis' Measured Plan To Fight the Darkness
Michael Kahn
Friday, March 23, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/23/E
D103778.DTL
COMMENTS on Gov. Gray Davis' energy programs by apologists for former Gov.
Pete Wilson bring to mind Robert Kennedy's admonition that it is better to
light a candle than curse the darkness.
Let's examine the darkness created by Wilson's energy deregulation scheme.
The 1996 law he signed could not have been more wrong headed.
-- Why did it hand energy price control over to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission?
-- Why did it free wholesale prices, while capping the price utilities could
charge customers?
-- Why did the former state Public Utilities Commission force utilities to
sell off their fossil fuel power plants, leaving them vulnerable to predatory
pricing by out-of-state merchant generators?
-- Why did the Wilson-era PUC bar utilities from entering into contracts to
ensure a long-term supply of cheap electricity?
-- Most pointedly, why did California enter into deregulation without enough
available generation to ensure a fair market based on balanced supply and
demand?
These are tough questions. It is not hard to understand why former proponents
of the 1996 deregulation scheme would rather not answer them, preferring to
bemoan the darkness and curse Davis' actions.
The Wilson apologists jeer at plans for the state to purchase the power grid,
though they surely know the value of a well-maintained, fully functioning
electric transmission network. Bottlenecks in the grid impede the sharing of
power between Northern and Southern California. This was a main reason
Northern California experienced rolling blackouts in January while Southern
California had plenty of power.
The state's purchase of the grid will infuse new cash into the utilities,
pulling them back from the brink of bankruptcy, while giving the state a
tangible and valuable asset in exchange.
And ownership of the grid will allow the state to modernize it, removing
bottlenecks and upgrading technology - something the utilities have long
failed at doing.
The apologists ignore the state's strong record on energy conservation and
Davis' actions to enhance these efforts.
California now has the nation's second-best energy conservation record. The
governor has budgeted $404 million in new conservation measures and added an
executive order offering 20 percent rebates to those who reduce their
consumption 20 percent over last year. These measures will reduce commercial
lighting, encourage residential and industrial efficiency and make state and
commercial buildings more energy efficient.
The apologists disregard the fact that the governor has also reversed a trend
that had seen power plant construction in California drop to insignificance
in the '80s and '90s. Since April 1999, the California Energy Commission has
licensed nine major new power plants. Six are under construction. This is
part of a streamlined, fast-track plant licensing process that aims to put an
additional 20,000 megawatts on line by the summer of 2004, a nearly 50
percent increase in generation.
And the apologists refuse to recognize that California is building the right
sort of power plants - efficient, clean and environmentally friendly, with a
strong bent toward renewable power sources.
In fact, while some would go Texas' route and build plants that meet only the
bare minimum of environmental requirements, California is continuing the
effort that has made it the nation's leader in the use of clean, renewable
power sources.
Instead, the apologists engage in name calling, such as the charge leveled by
former Wilson communications director Dan Schnur on this page that Loretta
Lynch, the Davis appointee as PUC chair, is inexperienced and has failed to
deal effectively with the energy emergency.
Forget for a moment that of the 22 people who have served as PUC
commissioners since 1980, only six had any energy expertise before their
appointments.
Forget for a moment that one of the principal architects of deregulation was
Daniel Fessler, the UC Davis contract law professor with no special expertise
in energy issues whom Gov. Wilson appointed as PUC president.
Just consider this: It was the PUC under Lynch that freed the utilities to
buy electricity on cheaper, forward contracts outside the Power Exchange.
This corrected a huge Wilson-era PUC blunder that put utilities in an energy
price straitjacket. The Lynch-led PUC also prohibited utilities from selling
additional power plants, and it began the successful effort to make
California's ISO (the Independent System Operator that runs the state's power
grid) independent of the industry-connected officials who controlled it.
Meanwhile, what sort of grand solutions have the apologists presented? Drill
for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, build nuclear
plants on closed military bases and encourage the construction of dirty
Texas- style power plants in California.
Drilling in the Arctic will not produce a watt of new power for California.
Californians have long said they do not want the risks presented by new
nuclear plants.
And lax Texas pollution rules prompted the Dallas Morning News to charge in a
Dec. 17 editorial that Texans are choking on the exhaust from power plants.
Most disingenuously, the apologists would "let the market work," claiming
that unfettered market forces will soon bring fair and balanced prices. But
the market doesn't work now, as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
repeatedly admitted, most recently with its finding that generators
overcharged the state in January.
Unfortunately, for the most part the same commission had refused to clamp
down on sky-high prices charged by generating companies. Look at New York's
deregulated market, where there are no caps on retail electric prices. Market
forces have done consumers there little good. New Yorkers pay the highest
prices for electricity in the country. And the New York Times has reported
that rates paid by consumers have increased a whopping 40 percent just since
1999.
Those who would allow the market to work (let the darkness reign) know well
that if the market "works" to produce New York-style rate increases in
California, the consequences to the public would be dire.
Compare this to Gov. Davis' well-structured plan for effective energy
conservation and stabilization of the state's electricity market and his
expedited program to bring clean, efficient new power plants on line quickly.
Robert Kennedy would understand Gov. Davis' approach and his critics'
perspective.
Michael Kahn is a member of the state Independent System Operator's board of
governors.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 25

Bombshell Warning on Power Cost
Spending may double and rates skyrocket, governor's office tells Legislature
Greg Lucas, Lynda Gledhill, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N176940.DTL
Top Davis administration officials told lawmakers yesterday that the state
may have to spend twice as much as expected on electricity purchases over the
next two years - requiring rate increases of as much as 100 percent.
The stunning admission by the Davis administration contradicts his repeated
promises that his plan to ease California's energy woes could be done without
a rate increase.
California will probably need to issue $23 billion in bonds for electricity
buys, more than double the amount Davis said would be needed by the state to
keep electricity flowing until California's cash-poor utilities can get back
on their feet.
Administration officials told lawmakers to stop action on a bill that would
have capped the state's energy purchases at $10 billion.
But a Davis spokesman said the numbers were far from firm.
"There are a lot of scenarios being run . . . and until we complete the
negotiations, this can be added up any way you want," said Steve Maviglio,
press secretary to Davis.
"Those numbers are not based on any reality right now," he said. "There are
too many things up in the air."
Assembly Democrats told a different story.
They said Tim Gage, director of Davis' Department of Finance, Cabinet
Secretary Susan Kennedy and John Stevens, Davis' top energy aide, met with
Assembly Democratic leaders and dropped the bombshell.
And they did so just as those same leaders were trying to convince fellow
lawmakers how important the bill was to the Davis administration.
They also said that Davis, who was in the Palm Springs area for most of the
day and briefly attended a fund-raiser at a golf club, was unaware of the
figures.
PURCHASES IN BILLIONS
The three top aides said that electricity purchases for this year by the
state would be $16 billion, not the $10 billion initially predicted. An
additional $7 billion in state power purchases would be needed next year,
they said.
The state has been buying power at a clip of $45 million a day since Jan. 17
because the troubled utilities could no longer afford to make the purchases.
From the start of the energy crisis, the state has planned to repay its power
purchases through bond sales. The bonds would be paid off by a portion of the
amount ratepayers are charged on their monthly bills.
Davis has so far insisted that enough money could be found to cover the $10
billion without raising rates.
But his aides said if the size of the bonds ballooned to $23 billion, a hefty
rate increase would be necessary.
INCREASE UPON INCREASE
The Public Utilities Commission is already planning to make permanent a
temporary 9 percent increase. An additional automatic 10 percent is scheduled
for no later than March 2002.
But the aides said, on top of that, an additional 60 percent to 80 percent
increase would be required to cover the debt service.
"For some time, I have believed a fundamental part of solving this problem is
admitting there needs to be a rate increase, and the numbers that have been
shared today make that inevitable, and we should start dealing with the
reality as soon as possible," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek
(Santa Cruz County).
One consumer advocate said the revelation means the utilities are closer to
bankruptcy because the state and ratepayers won't have the cash to bail them
out.
And it could mean political trouble for Davis.
"Unless the governor issues an ultimatum to lower the prices, everybody's
bill will double, and he will not be able to run for re-election in 2002,"
said Harvey Rosenfield, head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights.
PG&E THREATENS SUIT
The news came as Pacific Gas and Electric Co. threatened to take the state to
court over Davis' plan to force the company to pay back certain creditors.
Davis' proposal would require the utilities to pay alternative power
generators for all the power that they supply, something PG&E said it cannot
afford to do. Several of the generators shut down earlier this week as
rolling blackouts spread across the state.
The bill stalled yesterday in the Assembly as Republicans objected. Lawmakers
will resume debate Monday.
Earlier in the week, Davis announced that action would be taken by the
Legislature and the Public Utilities Commission that would guarantee payment
to the alternative energy providers. He also said the state -- which has
spent $3.7 billion to purchase power -- should be paid back first.
Without that promise, several of the small biomass, solar and wind producing
plants -- called qualified facilities -- said they would have taken Southern
California Edison Co. into bankruptcy court. The alternative generators
provide enough electricity to power roughly 6 million homes.
PG&E said it cannot afford to pay the alternative producers and reimburse the
state for the billions it has spent purchasing power.
"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," Gordon Smith, PG&E's
president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
DIFFERING VIEWS ON COSTS
According to PG&E's numbers, the company collects $400 million a month in
rates. It says the average price to pay all the generation sources exceeds
$1. 4 billion a month.
But consumer advocate Nettie Hoge said the utilities are exaggerating their
own costs in order to try to keep as much money as possible.
"It's just absurd," said Hoge, the head of The Utility Reform Network. "They
have a temper tantrum every time something doesn't go their way."
The bill PG&E objected to is necessary to allow the PUC to order utilities to
pay small power generators who agree to sign lower-priced contracts to
provide energy.
The proposal offers generators a choice of agreeing to a five-year contract
at $79 per megawatt or a 10-year deal at $69 per megawatt, Davis said. The
going rate now is about $150 a megawatt. The PUC wants to act as early as
Tuesday to bring some financial relief to the generators, who have been paid
pennies on the dollar.
Assembly Republicans objected to the bill in part because it would allow the
PUC to change the formula for setting the price paid alternative producers so
that it no longer considered the price of natural gas.
Co-generators -- some of the largest of which are operated by oil refineries
-- say without the price of natural gas as a consideration, it would cost
them more to produce energy than what they would be paid for it.
E-mail Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1

Davis at Fund-Raiser as His Bill Languishes
Critics say he should have been at Capitol
Greg Lucas, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N171337.DTL
While the Assembly struggled -- and failed -- to pass a bill aimed at keeping
hundreds of small energy generators from bankruptcy, Gov. Gray Davis attended
a $10,000-a-head golf fund-raiser yesterday in Palm Desert.
Organized by Duane Dauner, president of the California Healthcare
Association, the event was held at Bighorn Golf Club, a luxurious private
country club of which Dauner is a member.
Davis' top political adviser said the governor didn't play golf, just stopped
by a luncheon before the round began so he could return to Sacramento.
But during Davis' absence, a bill he backed -- critical to bailing out small
power generators -- languished in the Assembly.
On Thursday, lawmakers canceled next week's long-planned annual trip to
Washington, D.C., to focus on energy issues.
"There is not a lot of electricity to be found on the golf course," said
Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a chief
critic of Davis and the state's utilities. "He ought to be in Sacramento to
try and solve the crisis and not prospecting for contributions in the grass
in Palm Springs."
The Democratic governor has been frequently criticized for the time he spends
raising money for his campaign fund, money that comes from well-heeled
interests with dozens of issues pending before his administration.
Since becoming governor, Davis amassed $25 million by the end of 2000 --
averaging more than $1 million a month in contributions, often from fund-
raisers directed at specific industries.
Garry South, Davis' political adviser, said Davis was in Palm Springs to
dedicate a University of California building and "dropped by a lunch"
preceding the golf.
South said the fund-raiser "was a diverse group of people that paid varying
amounts of money."
Lawmakers canceled their yearly visit to federal officials on issues
important to the Golden State because they didn't want to give the impression
that "there was somewhere else more important than California," said state
Sen.
Don Perata, D-Oakland.
Raising money at a tony golf resort during the crisis simply looks bad,
Perata said.
"We have to be really careful because the public's patience and their
confidence in what we're asking them to do depends on how they see us
reacting to the problem," he said. "This will be negatively interpreted."
Other lawmakers said the governor's top-level staff was working on the
problem but acknowledged the golfing fund-raiser looked bad.
"It's not the best symbolic message, but I feel we have to give him the
benefit of the doubt," said Assemblywoman Carole Migden, D-San Francisco.
Davis did appear briefly yesterday on nationally broadcast CNBC to talk about
the energy crisis and blast power generators for allegedly overcharging the
state. He appeared live from Palm Springs.
The California Healthcare Association represents nearly 500 hospitals and
boasts on its Web site that it "influences public policy development through
both legislative and regulatory advocacy efforts."
Last month, the group introduced a legislative package to expand nursing
education and streamline college requirements for nurses.
One of the bills calls for spending $120 million a year on nursing classes.
The group also is lobbying the new Department of Managed Health Care, which
is staffed by Davis appointees, to speed up payment of $1 billion in late
bills owed to hospitals.
Davis signed a bill last year that gave the HMO czar the power to sanction
health care plans for failing to pay Dauner's clients, the hospitals, on
time.
In his first six months in office, Davis attended a fund-raising dinner at
Dauner's house that brought in an estimated $100,000. It was part of a spree
that netted the governor a record-breaking $6.1 million in half a year.
At the time, Dauner told the Los Angeles Times: "We don't talk policy at
those kinds of things, or legislation. This was really more of a social
event. He talked about his goals and probably spent more time discussing
education than anything else."
Dauner could not be reached for comment yesterday.
E-mail the reporters at glucas@sfchronicle.com and bsalladay@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 13

	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 23, 2001
CONTACT: PG&E News Department (415) 973-5930

PG&E Responds to Energy Proposals in Sacramento
	San Francisco -- Pacific Gas and Electric Company today announced that it
will be forced to challenge actions now being contemplated by the State of
California to impose new demands on its frozen rate structure. The proposed
actions will destabilize its current situation with creditors and put the
entire possibility of reaching a balanced solution to California's energy
crisis at risk.
	This week, the State has made clear its intention to use Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's existing rate structure to begin fully paying Qualifying
Facilities (QFs) in advance, for future power purchases, starting April 1,
and to reimburse the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in advance of any
other generating source, including utility-retained generation, bilateral
contracts, QFs or the Independent System Operator (ISO).
	"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," said Gordon R.
Smith, president and chief executive officer of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. "The numbers just don't work."
	Currently, under frozen rates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company has been
collecting approximately $400 million per month for the purchase of electric
power. This revenue has been used in payments to power suppliers, including
power purchases from irrigation districts and bilaterals, to cover costs of
operating our retained generation, and is insufficient to cover payments to
the ISO and QFs. The average combined energy bill from all of these sources
exceeds $1.4 billion a month, and may go even higher in the coming months.
Moreover, the utility's financial condition has been further jeopardized by
the failure of the DWR to acknowledge responsibility for the full "net open
position," i.e. the power that must be purchased on the spot market. This
dispute over the net open position is threatening to accrue additional
liabilities for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
	"We continue to work with State officials to develop a constructive,
comprehensive solution that assures that California has a reliable and fairly
priced supply of power. Nevertheless, we have a duty to our suppliers,
lenders and shareholders to protect the assets of the utility, and we must
challenge any action by the State to force us to pay out more than is
collected in rates," Mr. Smith concluded.
	?


nice.  i knew that would be a better choice.  saturday night is on dog.  we
are going to golf sat also if you are in.  let me know.  tee time is at 11.


FYI:  Here's monthly share price date over last five years for:  OAT, KO,
PEP, S&P, BRKA, BRKB.  (I included Berkshire in the event we want to say
something about Buffet's recent performance.  I've attached another file with
a chart that shows Buffet versus S&P for 1, 3 and 5 year performance)

For the OAT, KO, PEP, etc. file, calculated year-on-year performance
(excluding dividends).  Also, you'll see highlighted in yellow month-on-month
performance for 2001.  But ain't done any chart for that stuff yet.  Thought
we'd discuss first.

Best,
Jeff


------------------------------------------------------------
Schwab Signature Services e.Bulletin - September 2000
------------------------------------------------------------

1.  Dreaming of an Overseas Retirement
2.  Internet Scams
3.  Is Trading Stocks "Just Like Gambling"
4.  Election 2000 - An Investor's Guide
5.  Financial Services: The Urge of the Merge
6.  Come Walk the Boards
7.  After Hours Trading Becomes Extended Hours Trading
8.  Decimalization:  What is It
9.  Price Alerts: Faster Than Ever
10. Just Say "Trade": Expanded Speech Recognition on
    Schwab by Phone(TM)
11. Attend a Schwab Workshop - Learn How to Take Control
    of Your Portfolio
12. A Smart Way to Invest in Technology
13. CEO Speakers Series
14. Argus Roundtable

Welcome to the September Edition of the Schwab Signature
Services e.Bulletin.

To send us your feedback, change your e-mail address, ask
account questions, or to unsubscribe, go to the bottom of
this e-mail.

If you have not set up your Schwab account for Web
access, please contact your Signature Services team.

************************************************************
Receive a $100 Gift Certificate for opening a new Schwab
account online now.

Offer good until October 15, 2000

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv1t/sept/promo/

************************************************************

Dreaming of an Overseas Retirement?
------------------------------------------------------------
Many Americans dream of retiring to an exotic locale
overseas. The dream can come true for those "expats" who
plan their retirement wisely. Here's a look at retiring
abroad, with links to valuable online resources and a guide
to some of the decisions you'll make on such issues as
health, taxes, voting status and Internet access.

Read the full article
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv2t/sept/retire/

Internet Scams
------------------------------------------------------------
Pump and dump. Virtual stocks. Pyramid schemes. These are
just a few of the online frauds, scams and swindles that
tempt the unwary investor. Remember, if an alleged
investment sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't
legitimate. Another hint: beware of an e-mail that
announces that you're on the "friends and family" list of
an IPO you've never heard of. Protect yourself from these
deceptions, and others, by reading this article, which
describes each scam and also refers you to links at
the SEC and other regulators for more information.

Read the full article:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv3t/sept/internet/

Is Trading Stocks "Just Like Gambling?"
------------------------------------------------------------
There are certain parallels between investing in stocks
and gambling on games such as roulette and blackjack. But
it's important to know where these similarities end, and
how the practices or an astute investor are much different
than those of a casino gambler. This article explains how
the Las Vegas odds favor the house, and why gambling is
not the same as intelligent, long-term investing.

Read the full article:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv4t/sept/investing/

Election 2000 - An Investor's Guide
------------------------------------------------------------
The Presidential campaign is heading into its stretch run,
and the Republican and Democratic candidates have staked
out positions on the issues that most concern investors.
Where do they differ - and where do they agree? This
analysis from the Schwab Washington Research Group*
summarizes where the candidates stand on taxes, the Federal
budget, health care, education, and retirement savings. If
you think there's hardly any difference between the two
platforms, you're in for a surprise.

*Schwab's Washington Research Group and Technical Analysis
Group are part of Capital Markets & Trading, a division
of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Read the full article:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv5t/sept/election/

Financial Services: The Urge of the Merge?
------------------------------------------------------------
The once staid world of financial services appears to be
undergoing tremendous change, as commercial banks,
insurers, brokers and others grapple with new technologies
and deregulation. Recent legislation by Congress was
expected to trigger a wave of cross-industry mergers and
acquisitions. Yet this feeding frenzy has been slow to
begin, due to Y2K concerns, rising interest rates and
lower stock prices. What's the outlook now for a
convergence? Will bankers gobble insurers, or vice versa?
Where are some of the opportunities for investors? Read
this analysis from the Washington Research Group.*

*Schwab's Washington Research Group and Technical Analysis
 Group are part of Capital Markets & Trading, a division
 of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Read the full article:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv6t/sept/mergers/

Come Walk the Boards
------------------------------------------------------------
Check out our new streamlined message boards at
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv7t/sept/boards/.
Since July, we've added eight boards on popular topics
such as mortgages and margin investing. If you haven't
registered, do so today!

After Hours Trading Becomes Extended Hours Trading
------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an update on new trading times and policies:
- Pre-Market session: Order entry begins at 7:45am ET,
  Execution between 8:00am - 9:15am ET
- After Hours session extended: Order entry begins
  at 4:05pm ET, Execution between 4:15pm - 8:00pm ET
- Ability to trade odd and mixed lots
- Most Listed and Nasdaq securities are available

Remember that Extended Hours Trading poses certain risks
and may not be for everyone. Schwab reserves the right to
change or modify hours of operation for extended hours
trading at any time.

To learn more go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv8t/sept/extendedhrs/

Due to limited liquidity in extended hours trading
sessions, there are no assurances that an investor's
stock order will be executed.

Decimalization: What is It?
------------------------------------------------------------
Decimalization is the process of converting the pricing
of equities from fractions to decimals. Currently, U.S.
markets quote and price stocks (and their underlying
options) in fractions, while most foreign markets use
decimal pricing. The conversion process will take place
gradually, with the first phase on August 28.

To find out more about this conversion and how it might
affect your trades and investments, check out
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv9t/sept/decimal/

Price Alerts: Faster Than Ever
------------------------------------------------------------
Now Signature Services clients who subscribe
to Schwab's Price Alert service can receive their Price
Alerts even more rapidly. We are accelerating the delivery
of Price Alerts, which can be delivered to you via e-mail
or pager.

Price Alerts are triggered by criteria you select for
securities you request. If one of your stocks rises above
or drops below the market price you've set in advance, you
will know right away.

To subscribe to Price Alerts, click here:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv10t/sept/alerts/

Just Say "Trade": Expanded Speech Recognition on Schwab
by Phone(TM)
------------------------------------------------------------
We recently added the capability to place trade orders
using speech recognition on Schwab by Phone. Just call in,
and the system will prompt you to speak key words that
allow you to get quotes, place, review or modify trade
orders, and review account balances.

You'll find this service handy when you're away from your
computer for access to your Schwab account.

To try Schwab by Phone, call 1-800-435-8804 and press 1
for Quotes or press 2 for Trades. Telebroker, our touch-
tone service is also available at 1-800-272-4922.

For more information, go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv11t/sept/phone/

Attend a Schwab workshop - Learn How to Take Control
of Your Portfolio
------------------------------------------------------------
Investing Foundations2: Putting Your Plan Into Action(TM)
Learn about Schwab's Core and Explore (TM) strategy,
designed to help minimize risk and improve your ability to
maximize portfolio performance.

Space is limited. Please call 1-877-762-7280 (from 9:30am -
6:00pm ET, Monday - Friday) to reserve a spot.

A Smart Way to Invest in Technology
------------------------------------------------------------
MarketPro Talk featuring Dennis McKechnie, PIMCO Funds
Wednesday, September 13, 2000 at 7:30pm ET

Technology has been the engine driving the stock market's
remarkable bull run, yet many investors have held off
buying tech stocks. Have you ever considered having an
expert pick tech stocks for you? Listen in an get involved
in the discussion.

Funds focusing their investments on companies involved in
a single sector - such as technology - may involve a
greater degree of risk than an investment in other mutual
funds with greater diversification. Please read prospectus
carefully before investing.

To find out how to participate in this live Webcast, go
to:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv12t/sept/marketpro/

CEO Speaker Series
------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, September 21, 2000
7:00pm ET
Mr. George Bell
President and CEO
Excite@Home

Excite@Home combines the reach and recognition of one of
the Web's most popular sites with the broadband power of
the world's leading cable Internet provider. The result is
a new way of delivering interactive entertainment,
communication and commerce to the home. Join George Bell
as he describes how he helped establish Excite@Home as a
dominant marketing force worldwide.

To find out how to participate in this live Webcast, go
to:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv13t/sept/speaker/

Argus Roundtable
------------------------------------------------------------
"Focus on the Baby Boomer"
Wednesday, September 27, 7:00pm ET

Baby Boomers are moving through their peak earning years.
The health care, financial service, and leisure industries
are experiencing heightened demand from this large
demographic group. Join Argus analysts in this live video
event as they discuss companies that are "Baby Boomer
plays" and debate which ones they feel are most attractive.

For more information and instructions on how to
participate in the Argus Roundtable, go to:
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv14t/sept/argus/

------------------------------------------------------------
To change your e-mail address
------------------------------------------------------------
Log on using the link below, and you will be taken to the
page that will allow you to update our e-mail address
securely.  For your protection, we are unable to accept
instructions to change your e-mail address sent in reply
to this message.

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv15t/sept/change/

------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, ask account service questions, or provide
feedback
------------------------------------------------------------

The Schwab e.Bulletin is brought to you as a complimentary
service.  If you would prefer not to receive this is the
future:

1.  Log on to your account using the link below.
2.  Under Choose Your Alerts, uncheck the box next to
    e.Bulletin and then click continue.

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv16t/sept/unsub/

For account service questions, please send a secure e-mail
by logging on to your account at:

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/1sigserv17t/sept/accntserv/

To provide feedback about Schwab's e.Bulletin, please
send all feedback directly to online.editor@schwab.com

We appreciate your comments!

------------------------------------------------------------
The Schwab e.Bulletin mailing list is managed and used
exclusively by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.  Schwab does not
sell or rent information about its customers to any third
party.

Notice:  All e-mail sent to or from the Charles Schwab
corporate e-mail system may be retained, monitored, and/or
reviewed by Schwab personnel.

(c) 2000 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.  All rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE (0900-8327).


Thanks Steve,  actual savings prior to allocation was $782,375   I miss
calculated when I sent the memo.

	Steven J Kean@EES
	08/01/2000 09:11 AM

		 To: Gary Fitch/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tax Valuations for YR2000

Congratulations!

Gary Fitch@ENRON on 07/27/2000 12:02:47 PM
To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Tax Valuations for YR2000

Bill, we hit a home run this morning with HCAD.  They have agreed to take my
reduced valuation on the Enron fleet.  A reduction of  $16,079,000 in taxable
value.  This results in savings of $482,375.  That's not all, our allocation
based on records for operations outside of the state of Texas resulted in
additional savings of $1,559,638. Total savings to our 2000 budget will be
$2,042,013.


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 02:22 PM -----

	David Portz
	02/20/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: TVA

----- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 02:07 PM -----

	Edward Sacks@ENRON
	02/20/2001 12:22 PM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: TVA

David,

TVA's proposed credit assurance language should be amended to reflect our
standard language with the downgrade event being established at BBB- or
Baa3.  Also, your redline should also delete any subjectivity which provides
the TVA the unilateral right to call for additional or replacement
collateral.  In looking at historical agreements (i.e. master options
agreement), our standard credit provisions have been accepted.  I will
forward another email with their prefered gty form.  It appears that we
currently have outgoing gtys; however, they govern certain agreements like
the Master Options Agmt.  Comments or questions, please call.

Ed Sacks

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron on 02/20/2001
11:54 AM ---------------------------

Joseph Wagner
02/20/2001 09:57 AM
To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: TVA

Dave and Ed,

We closed two option deals with TVA last week.  They have sent the following
comments on our standard confirms.

Dave - Rogers has already commented on the 16 hour call.  His comment was
that this is a 16 hour call, all or none, not up to 16 hours.  Secondly, the
option is exercisable in 50 MW blocks (increments of 50MW) not a minimum of
50 MW.  Please look at the rest of the language and let me know your
thoughts.  Thanks.

Ed-  there are some credit additions on page 3 under credit assurance.  Let
me know what you think.

Thanks guys.

-Joe


Included  is the monthly volatility

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dimitry, Dirk
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	RE: Volatility??

Thanks Monika

What about monthly volatility, instead of annualized volatility.

Dirk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causholli, Monika
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Dimitry, Dirk
Subject:	RE: Volatility??

Hey Dirk,

Here is the volatility using the RISI NBSK delivered to US

 << File: volatility.xls >>


Soaring Electric Use More Fiction Than Fact
Chronicle investigation finds power companies manipulate data to excuse their
towering rates Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
Sunday, March 11, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/11/M
N213155.DTL

Power companies say it so often, and with such certainty, that it has become
a virtual mantra: "Skyrocketing" energy use by Californians is a root cause
of the state's power crisis, and justification for surging electricity
prices.
But a computer analysis of electricity usage data by The Chronicle reveals
that the mantra is a myth -- that overall growth in electricity demand hasn't
been nearly as great as the industry portrays it.
The industry has painted the summer of 2000 as the equivalent of a 100-year
storm in meteorology -- an event so powerful and unexpected that the existing
infrastructure was devastated by its force.
The statistics show that 2000, taken in total, was nothing of the sort.
Moreover, two independent state agencies' assessments of California's power
plant capacity appear to show that the growth should have been easily
accommodated.
The companies have defended their practice of increasingly taking power-
generation plants out of service by arguing that heavy demand and consequent
plant usage necessitated major, time-consuming repairs.
"The claims that demand growth is rampant and that it was totally unexpected
and due to the Internet economy, to Silicon Valley, or server farms,
or people recharging cell phones -- that's bogus," said Tom Kelly, assistant
executive director of the California Energy Commission. "About as bogus as
you can get."
The Chronicle's findings are based on data collected by the California
Independent System Operator, a manager of the state's electricity grid. They
show:
-- Total electricity consumption in California increased only 4.75 percent in
2000 from 1999, a sharp contrast to claims of industry representatives, who
have repeatedly relied on isolated, loose or selective comparisons that make
growth appear as high as 20 percent. In fact, the single greatest hour of
electricity usage in 2000 was actually lower than any peak demand period in
1999 or 1998.
-- Average peak demand -- the average of the highest hour of electricity
usage for each day -- increased only 4.79 percent from 1999 to 2000. Even
during the months of May to September in 2000, when the greatest spikes in
electricity usage occur, demand growth was only 8.31 percent higher than the
same period the year before.
-- More than 30 days of critical power shortage warnings, so-called Stage 3
emergencies, and two days of blackouts this year occurred at times of
moderate energy use -- levels often below those at which neither warnings nor
blackouts have occurred in the past.
The findings appear to buttress suspicions that the "skyrocketing demand"
explanation for rising energy prices is a cover for what is really happening
--
that power companies have simply started charging more for an essential
commodity, regardless of whether it is in short supply.
Presented with The Chronicle's findings, Gary Ackerman, a representative for
the Western Power Trading Forum, a trade group representing power companies,
said the calculations support the industry position that electricity demand
is growing strong.
"That's pretty healthy growth for California as opposed to the long-term
historical average, which is close to 2 percent," he said. "To me, that's
really strong growth."
Energy demand is certainly on the rise in California -- growth of more than 4
percent is still double what was projected -- and the state has obviously
fallen behind in building power plants.
Even though a recent study found California ranked 47th out of the 50 states
in per-capita energy consumption, the surging demand explanation has become
so accepted that leading officials accept it as gospel. Gov. Gray Davis has
made energy conservation -- 10 percent, at that -- a centerpiece of his
efforts to solve the crisis.
"Energy use is growing," said state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, citing
the growth of Silicon Valley and high-tech operations statewide. "There's
been tremendous growth, whether manufacturing or high tech -- cell phones,
faxes, whatever. The stuff is growing."
Yet the energy industry has been steadfast in its insistence that the
consumer is largely to blame. In testimony and submissions to government
bodies considering prescriptions for the crisis, energy demand growth has
consistently been overstated.
Joe Bob Perkins, the chief operating officer of Houston-based Reliant Energy
Inc., told the U.S. Senate in January that California's growing economy and
high summer temperatures caused electricity use to "surge dramatically" -- a
demand growth of 13 percent.
Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant, said Perkins' testimony was based
on estimates by the federal Energy Information Administration of monthly
retail electricity sales.
"We do stand by that," Wheatley said. "Unfortunately, it does not track with
ISO data."
The industry-backed Edison Electric Institute said in a report that
electricity demand grew by anywhere from 5 percent to 21 percent during the
spring of 2000, compared with the same period a year earlier.
Russell Tucker, an economist for the institute, said the group's figures were
derived by identifying the single highest hour of electricity demand for each
spring month of 1999 and 2000 and comparing them, finding the May peak rose
21 percent.
Granted, the state Energy Commission uses the same model to determine whether
California has enough plant capacity to meet demand. But the presentation
makes it appear that overall demand, not just the absolute peak, is growing
by 21 percent. When the peak of each day is averaged and compared from year
to year, May's figure was much lower: 12.79 percent.
Also, nowhere did Edison's report note that the peak hour of 2000, a load of
43,784 megawatts on Aug. 16, was actually lower than the peak hours of either
of the previous two years -- 45,884 on July 12, 1999, or 44,406 on Sept.
1, 1998.
The Chronicle analysis of average peak demand showed that no month last year
grew more than June's 15.34 percent, though no blackouts occurred in that
month. May and June were the only months when demand growth exceeded 10
percent, the analysis showed. Most months recorded 4 percent or 5 percent,
and some -- such as September -- were less than 3 percent.
Two months, October and December, had demand levels lower than the year
before -- 4.22 percent less for October, 1.46 percent lower for December.
Mike Florio, a consumer lawyer and board member of the ISO, said that even
growth of less than 5 percent from 1999 to 2000 would seem overstated, since
1999 was a relatively mild weather year and 2000 was a much hotter one. "You
are quite right," Florio said. " 'Skyrocketing' demand is a myth."
MARKET MANIPULATION?
Consumer representatives and some politicians have long suspected that,
rather than dire imbalances between supply and demand, market manipulation is
behind the crisis.
Generators and power marketers adamantly deny this, saying they have done
everything they could to keep the lights on. They say they ran aging,
decrepit plants at higher-than-normal levels last summer to accommodate what
they described as unprecedented demand. They also say that, at great expense,
they delayed much-needed maintenance in order to keep the power flowing.
Their claims have received some support from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which said in a report last month that it found no evidence power
companies were using maintenance schedules to manipulate supply. The report,
however, was heavily qualified by the FERC, which said it did not investigate
other forms of manipulation. Moreover, the agency acknowledged that the bulk
of its investigation was conducted by simply calling power plants and
questioning them over the telephone.
The supply side of the energy equation is harder to penetrate, in part
because supply data are confidential. Thus, the question of how blackouts
could have occurred at such low levels of demand in January is hard to
answer. What is clear is that, at times, during the crisis this year, as much
as 12, 000 megawatts of electricity supply have been unavailable for use,
mostly because of unplanned plant outages -- about four times the level
anticipated by the ISO.
Power companies say the old plants they bought were not capable of producing
to the levels sketched out by the ISO and the Energy Commission, and that
everything from low water conditions, emissions limitations and high
temperatures last year caused less energy to be available than was
anticipated.
But others suggest that what began as a shortage caused by a withholding of
supply to drive up price has turned into one caused by withholdings out of
fear of not being paid.
What did go up, unquestionably, were wholesale electricity prices.
While average electricity usage during the heaviest hours last year increased
by less than 5 percent, prices charged by power companies to the utilities
that deliver juice to consumers increased more than 289 percent.
In June, the cost of a megawatt hour increased more than fivefold, going from
the 1999 level of $30.53 to $170.60. In October, prices doubled over the same
period a year earlier, going from $53.47 to $111.04. And in December --
despite a 1.46 percent decline in electricity usage from the previous
December -- peak wholesale electricity prices hit $425.59. They'd been $31.88
one year before.
Then the pace of price increases began to accelerate within the last six
months of 2000. Overall, average peak usage during December was about 31,200
megawatts, about a fifth lower than it was in August. Average prices in
December? They just about doubled, to $425 a megawatt hour.
The companies' explanation for rising prices despite falling demand was that
more and more plants had to be taken offline for repairs, decreasing supply.
Even given the high number of inoperable plants, questions remain about why
the existing supply could not cover demand.
On the blackout days of Jan. 17 and 18 fewer plants were offline -- and more
electricity was available -- than on days when the state managed to squeeze
by without turning out the lights.
Even today, with Stage 3 alerts having faded away, at least temporarily,
demand levels remain more or less the same as when California was in a
constant state of emergency. Moreover, the lists of offline plants are as
long as ever.
AMPLE POWER SHOULD EXIST
The Energy Commission and the ISO have concluded that California's power
plants are capable of generating more than 45,000 megawatts of electricity.
That means that even with plant repair outages, low water levels decreasing
hydraulic generation, air-pollution rules and other environmental
constraints, the power companies should be able to accommodate all but the
most extreme spikes in demand.
According to industry data obtained by The Chronicle, the Western Systems
Coordinating Council, a government-backed trade group in Salt Lake City,
concluded California would have considerable surpluses throughout 2000,
including margins as high as 39 percent in December, based on data provided
to it by the ISO. Even under low water conditions, the ISO reported, the
state would have total power resources of 47,532 megawatts in that month. Yet
unplanned outages were far higher, and the system began to crash that month
and into this year, at far lower levels of demand.
"Clearly," Florio said, "we should not be having a shortage at 2 a.m. on
Christmas Eve, when the only person awake is Santa Claus."
Chronicle Database Editor Erin McCormick assisted in data analysis for this
report. Chronicle editorial assistant Claire Smith assisted in data
collection for this report. / E-mail Christian Berthelsen at
cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at s
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Franky,

Please delegate this project and any others to someone else.  Let me know who will be working on these projects while you are away.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby
x37031
-----Original Message-----
From: Berutti, Aaron
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Grigsby, Mike
Subject: WestRateSheet

Mike,
Just wanted to keep you updated on the Rate Sheet project.  Franky sent me this email this morning.  Let me know if there is anything I can do for you in the meantime.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: Sulistio, Franky
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Berutti, Aaron
Cc: Dronet, David
Subject: RE: WestRateSheet

Hi Aaron,
I may not be able to get to this WestRateSheet until Mid November because I may be taking 2 week family leave starting this wednesday to care for my son.

I apologize for the delay.

Regards,
Franky

-----Original Message-----
From: Berutti, Aaron
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Sulistio, Franky
Subject: WestRateSheet

 This is the excel sheet that is linked to EOL Listen or we would like to be linked to EOL Listen that hopefully we can make a web page out of so that it can be posted on the plasma screen.

Aaron
 WestRateSheet


Thought I would remain incognito.


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for 6/15/2000.   I
will send 6/16/2000 later tonight.

Thanks,

Kyle


Just to confirm from our telephone conversation, I will be depositing
$8,046.60 Canadian to your TD account.  This is a retroactive payment per
David Oxley.  I'll forward you the calcuation as well.
Janice


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------

Regina Blackshear@ENRON
03/30/2000 04:59 PM
To: vblack4538@aol.com, sonia_l_castorena@reliantenergy.com,
Amber.Ebow@enron.com, Tammy Green <tcgreen@flash.net>, GRHRDH@aol.com,
jacelyne hill <YELLOWGIRLHILL@netscape.net>, rhondamjordan@hotmail.com,
"BENEDICT PETERS"<bouncing98@hotmail.com>, rosemary.a.reynolds@usa.xerox.com,
"WhiteBL(Barbara)"<BLWhite@equiva.com>, Yvonne Acosta/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tharsilla
Broussard/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Whiting/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y

this is nice
---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron on
03/30/2000 03:55 PM ---------------------------

"LaTonya Carter" <l_carter61@hotmail.com> on 03/30/2000 03:49:07 PM
To: anthonya@risecom.net, dana62_@hotmail.com, regina.blackshear@enron.com,
music@axs4u.net, DBUAKA1998@aol.com, v_ashford@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y

>From: "Alvita McKinney" <vitamae47@hotmail.com>
>To: queen33@hotmail.com, fdeary@hotmail.com, derexw@hotmail.com,
>l_carter61@hotmail.com, asmith@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us,
>fbrown@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us, ckizzee@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us, deiedre@usa.com,
>sweetmama_nicey@hotmail.com, dishonest19@hotmail.com, c-traylor@ti.com,
>asiaabdullah@ProdigyBiz.net, Karibbean@excite.com, valliar2000@yahoo.com,
>lewisf@TIRR.TMC.EDU, Juan_Johnson@hotmail.com, Onlysexylady@aol.com,
>KalimahAbdullah@PZLQS.com, dmukes@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us,
>suebeehoney25@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y
>Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:43:54 CST
>
>
>
>>>ENJOY THIS READING.
>>
>>>A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y
>>>
>>> > I ran into a stranger as he passed by.
>>> > "Oh, excuse me please" was my reply.
>>> >
>>> > He said, "Please excuse me too;
>>> > wasn't even watching for you."
>>> >
>>> > We were very polite, this stranger and I.
>>> > We went on our way and we said good-bye.
>>> >
>>> > But at home a different story is told,
>>> > How we treat our loved ones, young and old.
>>> >
>>> > Later that day, cooking the evening meal,
>>> > My daughter stood beside me very still.
>>> >
>>> > When I turned, I nearly knocked her down.
>>> > "Move out of the way," I said with a frown.
>>> >
>>> > She walked away, her little heart broken.
>>> > I didn't realize how harshly I'd spoken.
>>> >
>>> > While I lay awake in bed,
>>> > God's still small voice came to me and said,
>>> >
>>> > "While dealing with a stranger, common courtesy you use,
>>> > But the children you love, you seem to abuse.
>>> >
>>> > Look on the kitchen floor,
>>> > You'll find some flowers there by the door.
>>> >
>>> > Those are the flowers she brought for you.
>>> > She picked them herself, pink, yellow and blue.
>>> >
>>> > She stood quietly not to spoil the surprise,
>>> > and you never saw the tears in her eyes."
>>> >
>>> > By this time, I felt very small
>>> > and now my tears began to fall.
>>> >
>>> > I quietly went and knelt by her bed;
>>> > "Wake up, little girl, wake up," I said.
>>> >
>>> > "Are these the flowers you picked for me?"
>>> > She smiled, "I found 'em, out by the tree.
>>> >
>>> > I picked 'em because they're pretty like you.
>>> > I knew you'd like 'em, especially the blue."
>>> >
>>> > I said, "Daughter, I'm sorry for the way I acted today;
>>> > I shouldn't have yelled at you that way."
>>> >
>>> > She said, "Oh, Mom, that's okay. I love you anyway."
>>> > I said, "Daughter, I love you too,
>>> >
>>> > and I do like the flowers, especially the blue."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ====================================================
>>> >
>>> > Are you aware that:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > If we die tomorrow, the company that we are working for could easily
>>> > replace us in a matter of days. But the family we left behind will
>>>feel
>>> > the loss for the rest of their lives. And come to think of it, we pour
>>> > ourselves more into work than to our family - an unwise investment
>>> > indeed. So what is behind the story?
>>> >
>>> > You know what is the full word of family?
>>> > FAMILY = (F)ATHER (A)ND (M)OTHER, (I) (L)OVE (Y)OU ?
>>> >
>>> > It is worthwhile to share more time with them as they are getting
>>>older.
>>> > Make balance among all things.
>>> >
>>> > Fill life with love and bravery and we shall live a life uncommon.
>>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Kim:

I will handle this request from the Planning side, please let me know who my counterpart in Marketing will be.

Perry
713-853-0667

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chanley, Earl
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 6:05 PM
To:	Frazier, Perry
Subject:	FW: Tie in

PT

Can you follow up with the marketing on this?
I contacted Mr. Bradly for the locations and vols.
Volume = 200 mcfd
Press = may need compression unknowned at this time
line = TG385
Three well at first for above volume
location = WCRR    BLK 1    SEC 30
Would you let me know if marketing contact Mr. Bradly and if there is anything I can assist with

Thanks
Earl Chanley
505-625-8031

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Toews, John
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Johnson, Richard C ; Chanley, Earl
Subject:	Tie in

I received a call form Bob Bradly who is representing Vern E Falkner, and he needs to talk to someone about possibly doing a tie-in to our pipeline in Hansford County Texas. His phone number is 405-842-4334.
I attempted to contact both of you via phone and was unsuccessful, hence the e-mail. Did not wish for this to fall through the cracks.  Thanks, John Toews, OCC


Mark:  Attached is a communications plan for the ESA consolidation that is
underway as a consequence of the CALME disbandment and final stage efforts to
sell assets in Brazil and elsewhere.  Jim Bannantine and his senior
management team have been meeting with the Chairman's Office on the
consolidation, which included a request for a communication plan for both
internal and external audiences.  The plan incorporates recommendations from
a meeting that Jim chaired yesterday and subsequent inputs from his
management team.  Regards, Keith


PLEASE NOTE SPECIAL HOURS

Notice No. 01-349
October 22, 2001

TO:       All NYMEX Members/Member Firms
          All NYMEX Clearing Members
          All NYMEX Floor Traders
          All NYMEX Operations Managers

FROM:     George Henderson, Vice President

RE:       Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the November 2001 options contract for Unleaded
Gasoline (GOX1), Heating Oil (OHX1) and Natural Gas (ONX1) is Friday,
October 26, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting
documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and
299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trade=s adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers TO your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer FROM your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 5:55 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s)
at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT           APPROXIMATE TIME            USUAL   FAST
FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES                       OF MESSAGE        EVENT TIME
E-MAIL    (E)
                           AVAILABILITY
BOTH      (B)

Announce Out-of-the                 4:45PM          4:45PM        F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21         5:40PM          5:55PM        E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final      6:30PM          5:55PM        F

Announce Exercise/Assignment        7:15PM          7:15PM        B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is         11:30PM         11:30PM        F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 <<EXPFORMSPEC.XLS>>

(See attached file: EXPFORMSPEC.XLS)

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


-----Original Message-----
From: Bishop, Serena
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Bishop, Serena; Williams III, Bill; 'El Paso dispatchers'; 'Greg
Grill'; 'jhadda'; 'Kathy Peterson'; 'Luis Zaragoz'; 'Powermarketing';
Portland Real Time
Subject: Schedule for March 10th-11th and revised schedule for March 9th


Attached is a draft of the Contractor Protocols which work with the services
agreements of Hanover Measurement Services Company (Stone Entity) which were
circulated by Mary Cook last week.  Please review in conjunction with the
services agreements and provide comments

.


what do you mean, house guests from la jolla?

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/10/2001 10:25 AM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: A little change in plans

we are going to have house guests from La Jolla on Sunday, so I don't think
that golf would be appropriate - but you guys can still play without us.
Let me know before I cancel the tee time.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


>From: marketingDM@sdabocconi.it

>To: mcausholli@hotmail.com

>Subject: SDA Bocconi - Masters Division

>Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:17:34 +0000

>

>Dear Ms. Causholli,

>

>we thank you for the interest shown in our activities.

>

>Following to your request we inform you that you can pay the

>application fee in US Dollars if you can't do a bank transfer or

>check in Euro. Please, refer to you bank for the change rate as it is

>not fix.

>

>About check card and envelopes we can send it to you, so please send

>to us your mailing address.

>

>You need to send your original transcripts and reference letter via

>mail, so that you can complete just you application for admission

>online.

>

>Our MBA Progarmme is opened to graduates of every discipline

>with a Univesrity diploma.

>

>Besides, we would like to inform you that you can consult our course

>description at www.sdabocconi.it and calendar of our information

>session at www.sdabocconi.it/ad/en/md/calendario1.html

>

>For any further information, please, do not hesitate to contact us.

>

>Sincerely,

>Marketing Service

>Master's Division

>EI

>

>------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

>From: "Monika Causholli" <MCAUSHOLLI@HOTMAIL.COM>

>To: mcf@sdabocconi.it

>Subject: Questions for the master

>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:23:59 -0800

>

>

>

Hello,

>

I am interested for the master's degree at Bocconi and I have a few questions regarding the application below:

>

1) Can I pay the application fee in US dollars? I don't know if I can write a check in Euros. If yes, how much would it cost in US dollars?

>

2) I downloaded the application packet from the internet but I can't find the CHECK CARD that is required for the application. Where can I find it?

>

3) It says in the instructions that the envelopes provided should be used for the letters of recommendations and transcrips. But since I downloaded the application I don't have the provided e chosen just the MBA?

>

5) Can I do all application process online including recommendations, transcrips?

>

6) One of the questions in the application asks for the graduate degree, does this mean undergraduate degree? The reason I ask is that I haven't seen any question asking for undergraduate, only fo dollars instead?

>

Thanks for your help,

>

Monika Causholli

>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

>

>SDA Bocconi - Corporate Finance & Real Estate Dept.

>Via F. Bocconi, 8 - 20136 Milano Italy

>Course Secretary: Ms. Chiara Corti

>Phone number: +39 02 5836.6813-6816-6872

>Telefax number: +39 02 5836.6821

>Email: mcf@sdabocconi.it

>Web Site: www.sdabocconi.it/mcf/

>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2001
03:54 PM ---------------------------
From: Greg Caudell/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/02/2001 01:53 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Check this...

I incorporated some comments and info provided by IR.


The FERC interest rate is 9.02%.  I updated the NPV's based on that rate.  I added  a comparison between the 15% discount rate per term for the rates as bid.

Thanks,
James


Ann, I haven't heard from you with regard to whether you want me to work the
table at this program.  Please let me know...thanks, SRS


I know this is a duplicate email for some.  I am resending this email using a
more complete list of people.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________

Please see the attached memo.


I would probably drop the range volume and go with a specific amount... 10,000 - 25,000 instead of up to 200,000 as I am sure there is no way they will get that high.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:56 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Whitt, Mark
Subject:	EPNG Capacity Proposal

Steph,

Here's my proposal for Valero.  Would you (& legal?) like to review it before I send it?

Dave << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal.doc >>


-----Original Message-----
From:	Scott Tanner [SMTP:scott.tanner@truequote.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:13 AM
To:	chris@apbenergy.com;
Subject:	APB

Please click on the link below for a Happy Hour invitation from APB and True Quote

http://www.truequote.com/news/happyhour.htm


Mr. Lay,

I am writing to you this afternoon because I am concerned for the safety of me and my coworkers here at Enron.  In light of the recent events that have happened I am worried that security here at Enron is still lacking.  I only say this because just this morning I forgot my Enron badge, so I had to get a guest pass, this of course is not a big deal and happens all the time.  However, I had my backpack with me like usual and nobody seemed to even raise an eyebrow.  Now obviously I pose zero threat to Enron but I feel like somebody who walks in with a guest pass needs only a drivers license, which hasn't been a problem for most terrorists to acquire, of somebody who works here at Enron.  Can you see where I am going with this?

Anyway, I'm a first year analyst and this whole event makes me more and more nervous as time progresses and the events unfold.  I only come to you with this concern because I am not the only one of my friends who have mentioned it.  Please take this into consideration and know that I only raise this issue for the safety of everybody.

Sincerely,

Aaron Berutti
ENA Gas Fundamentals


Ben,

Here you go.

Andrew


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
05:55 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
12/12/2000 04:27 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: presentation on Tuesday

Vince,
I will be out of the office this Thursday afternoon.
Here is what I can present on Tuesday related to power prices:

Do you want to discuss it with me some other time?

Tanya


Per our conversation, it appears that the two companies are going to merge in
October?  Looking at Lotus Notes, I don't think we could pick two bigger dogs
of masters to have in place.  I don't think we want either master to be the
survivor master.  With Chase we have an old 1987 Interest Rate and Currency
Exchange Agreement and with Morgan we have a Master Energy Price Swap
Agreement.  Yuk, yuk.  If I had my druthers I say, LET'S START OVER.  I know
it's far reaching, but maybe we could make it our goal to have this master
replaced by October.  Do you think that's do-able?  Do we have a contact at
Chase/Morgan we can start dealing with?  I'm going to add chase to the
Legal/Credit list just as a tickler for us to get this thing rolling.


Mary:  Heard your news and I wish you the very, very best.  Please stay in
touch!!!!!

Cynthia Sandherr
The NewPower Company
1615 L Street, N.W.
Tenth Floor
Washington, D.C.  20036
(202) 828-8827
(202) 828-6325 (fax)
cynthia.sandherr@newpower.com
----- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/HOU/NewPower on 03/27/01 05:07 PM -----

----- Forwarded by Kathleen Magruder/HOU/NewPower on 03/24/01 02:58 PM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	03/23/01 01:24 PM

		 To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com, dapnucc@teleport.com, dick@pnucc.org,
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com, Frank_Afranji@pgn.com, raa@vnf.com,
Joseph Alamo, ajaldrich@snopud.com, Jeff Alexander, Al Alexanderson@Enron,
Keonee Almaida, hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us, Brenda Anderson, angles@howry.com,
Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, gdb@vnf.com, npbaker@bpa.gov, ellen@tca-us.com,
paulb@citizenspower.com, paulb@citizenspower.com, garybarbour@email.msn.com,
jbartus@cammckenna.com, glynda.becker@mail.house.gov, Samuel Behrends,
bbennett@bpa.gov, sberman@hewm.com, ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov,
KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM, sbooye@Skadden.com, raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us,
tbradley@bracepatt.com, scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com, sbrose@steptoe.com,
sbuchheit@bracepatt.com, alanb@wutc.wa.gov, Jim Byrne,
vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov, johncameron@dwt.com, Doug Carmichael, Ed
Cassidy, ajchambe@llgm.com, Melissa Chiechi, elchristensen@snopud.com,
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us, rcloward@avistacorp.com,
david_cohen@rniinc.com, Bill Comish, Victor Contract, powerlac@aol.com,
Frederick Coolbroth, michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca, kcorum@nwppc.org,
KCurry@bracepatt.com, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com,
kadaly/atty%moheck@mcimail.com, mday@gmssr.com, dearing@chelanpud.org,
tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com, Tom_Delaney@enron.com, sdleonard@earthlink.net,
dldorrell@stoel.com, Mary Doyle, Jay Dudley, mce2280@idahopower.com,
michaelearly@earthlink.net, Katherine Edwards, rle@givenspursley.com,
imaxtrans@aol.com, Chris Elliott, sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us,
kerwin@ect.enron.com, dezickson@mwe.com, Jim Fallon, fallonr@howrey.com,
Elias Farrah, Michele_Farrell@pgn.com, dfaulk@puget.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
Willard Fields, sfisher@avistaenergy.com, pfox@bracepatt.com, Pat Franklin,
John Frazzell, ericf@prestongates.com, don.furman@pacificorp.com,
segfurst@bpa.gov, Jackie Gallagher, craiggannett@dwt.com, Alvaro
Garcia/LON/ECT@ECT, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, wgibson@nwppc.org,
ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us, Pat Gilman, Alex Goldberg,
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com, Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov, Mary Groggin,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Hall, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Leo
Hamblin, whannaford@NWPPC.org, jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us,
rhardy@hardyenergy.com, kharri@puget.com, Steve_Hawke@pgn.com,
dhawkins@caiso.com, marc.hellman@state.or.us, Scott Helyer,
mhenry@bracepatt.com, dwmp@teleport.com, rhornby@tca-us.com, mhornst@aol.com,
dhuard@jmbm.com, Marlene Huntsinger@pgn.com, cfi1@tca-us.com, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, pljacklin@stoel.com, montrey@aol.com, danj@cfmdc.com,
kgjohnson@bpa.gov, ljohnson@pwrteam.com, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mkanner@kannerandassoc.com, karid@perkinscoie.com, pkaufma@ect.enron.com,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@Enron @ Enron, Devon
Kehoe <devon_kehoe@mentorg.com>, James Keller, Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov,
kkennedy@bdbc.com, Rick Kessler, rdking@bpa.gov, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, rsk@schwabe.com, gwilliams8@austin.rr.com,
John Klauberg, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, ekrogh@wiredweb.com,
blafferty@avistacorp.com, wdlamb@bpa.gov, John Lamb, Therese Lamb,
srlarson@bpa.gov, Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us, zora.lazic@bchydro.com,
kaleathley@bpa.gov, pamela_lesh@pgn.com, Debi LeVine, lcg@europa.com,
doug.little@powerex.com, Robert Loeffler, Chris Long, sjlong@bpa.gov,
rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx, david_lucio@iep.illinova.com,
king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca, kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com, Mark Maehr, Randal T
Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sueyen Mao, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Lee Martin@Enron,
maurw@perkinscoie.com, Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McCall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald, brugen@erols.com, mckinley@wpuda.org, mcm@vnf.com,
mcnichol@wapa.com, shauna@pnucc.org, Maureen McVicker,
pmeringolo@brobeck.com, demetcalf@bpa.gov, cemeyer@bpa.gov,
jmilegich@sppc.com, fred_miller@pgn.com, Jeffrey Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jerry.miller@pacificorp.com, Laura Miller, scott.miller@ferc.fed.us, Bill
Miner, phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov, pmohler@hewm.com, emoler@velaw.com,
nkmorgado@bpa.gov, Mike@tonkon.com, krmoxness@bpa.gov, mmps@millcreeklaw.com,
pmurphy@mbllp.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com, bmurtha@acy.sunint.com, Rich
Nassief, tod@mgninc.com, Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com, Patty Nichols, Christi
Nicolay, tmnoguchi@bpa.gov, darcy@tonkon.com, Sarah Novasel@sarah
novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom O'Donnell,
PObenchain@idahopower.com, Pegy Olds, Carol Opatrny, tpaine@avistacorp.com,
Dave Parquet, bpascoe@mtpower.com, afpaschke@bpa.gov, ccperigo@bpa.gov,
wlpernas@stoel.com, lpeters@pacifier.com, jill@pnucc.org, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, npickover@bracepatt.com, Phillip
Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alfred Pollard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walt Pollock@Enron,
gporter@sppc.com, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, jquint@puget.com,
arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us, maraschio@bpa.gov, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Rasmussen, Bobby Reeves/PDX/ECT@ECT,
preiten@pngc.com, reyna2r@kochind.com, shellyr@pacifier.com, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, raroach@bpa.gov, atrodrigues@bpa.gov, rarogers@bpa.gov,
peterroi@erols.com, Rothfelder@rlo-law.com, Richard Sanders,
jsaven@pacifier.com, Michael Schilmoeller/PDX/ECT@ECT,
jschlect@avistacorp.com, Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Seifert, Cara Semperger, asettanni@bracepatt.com,
Richard Shapiro, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Joshua
Sheinkman, jshurts@nwppc.org,  Sid, msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us,
slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com, small@wrightlaw.com, small@wrightlaw.com,
douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us, Mike Smith, Roger Smith, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harvey Spigal, mstauffer@mtpower.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net, JKStier@BPA.gov, rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com,
DASwanstrom@Verner.com, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, tabors@tca-us.com, Ron
Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ect @ ECT, James K Tarpey/DEN/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas,
ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov, jrt2058@idahopower.com, maryann@pnucc.org,
mtierney@sempra.com, robin_tompkins@pgn.com, Ann Tumlinson, AW Turner, Sheila
Tweed, Lisa Urick, rvermeers@avistacorp.com, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Walley, kristiwallis@sprintmail.com, walshl@howrey.com,
swalton@enron.com, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, kaward@bpa.gov, Kim
Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Wardell, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, sawatson@bpa.gov,
judy.welch@NWPP.ORG, 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM, Kwenzel@zzz.com,
cwestadt@sppc.com, Brian Whalen, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT,
klwmtp@worldnet.att.net, lyn_williams@pgn.com, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Vickie
Wolk-Laniewski@Enron, Ed Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, mwood@stoel.com, Steve Wright,
Teresa L Wright/HOU/ECT@ECT,  WSCC, Charles Yeung, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Kean, Travel in the
Park, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bernadette
Hawkins, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Donna Fulton, Roger Fragua/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry W
Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Dickson@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT @
ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, t.briggs@enron.com, Stacey Bolton, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,  Alan Comnes, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Portland West Desk, assad@elektro.com.br, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, cristinah@elektro.com.br, Carlos Gustavo
Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron, Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey
Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eidy
Catala/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gisele S Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Javier
Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Jean R Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joao
Paixao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Kikumi Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Kirsten
Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay
Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Melinda Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan T Covino/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Richter/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting on
April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31, 2001.  I
enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My new address
will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


She did teach me to answer SOMEONE'S questions, but I don't even know who
SOMEONES is! She also taught me to embrace my rudeness.

K

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           01/30/2001 03:44 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: beer?

Didn't your mother teach you that it was rude to not answer someones
questions?