Please print and fax this to Sheila.  You don't need to print the attachment.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000 12:20
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/28/2000 11:47 AM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
cc:

Subject: Turbine assignment clause

Hi there,

I made some revisions to the language Rose proposed.

Here are some questions/comments:

I deleted the references to changing any delegation of rights/obligations.
I'm not yet clear as to what the agency language will look like, and what
rights we need/want to change (i) the identity of the agent (ii) the role of
the agent (iii) whether the agency can be terminated.  I'm just not that
familiar with the structure yet, but if I can get that information, I'll work
on it.

I suggest we consider using a credit rating instead of "substantially
similiar" comparison.  Just easier to decipher.

Rose/Lisa, I've added some SPV language.

I'm added receipt of final payment as an exception to the credit rating
standard.  In other words, if they have received their final payment, they
can't use credit as a reason to not give consent.

I don't think we should agree to provide a list of power projects done by the
assignee in the past 5 years.  I also think 3 years is a bit much on audited
financials, but I didn't comment there.

I don't like their language that an affiliate must be intending to
own/operate the plant.  I've just bracketed the langauge and added
"construct", since I don't know if this point has already been agreed.

Enough explanation, here it is (with Word file attached below):

Except for as described in Section ___ [ next paragraph], neither Party shall
assign any or all of their duties or rights under this Contract without prior
written consent from the other Party; such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing:  (i) either Party [Agent, too?] may assign any
or all of its duties or rights to any Affiliate or subsidiary without the
other Party,s consent; (ii) Purchaser may assign any or all of its duties or
rights to any Affiliate of Enron Corp., without Seller,s consent, [provided
that such assignee shall construct, own or operate the [Units] for the
purpose of generating electric power for revenue], and (iii) Purchaser may
assign any or all of its rights and obligations without Seller,s consent
following [delivery/substantial completion?].  In each instance the
assignment shall be effective as of the time the assignor delivers notice to
the other party in accordance with [Section ]. [form to be agreed now?]

Seller shall only be deemed to be reasonable in withholding its consent if
the proposed assignee: (i) does not have [a credit rating of ___]
[substantially the same or better credit quality than Agent] unless (a) the
proposed assignee provides appropriate guaranties, letters of credit or other
assurances of payment issued by an entity or person with [a credit rating of
___] [substantially the same or better credit quality than Agent], or (b) the
assignor agrees to remain liable for all liability under this Agreement until
[delivery/substantial completion], or (c) is a party participating in or
providing financing or financing structures, including, without limitation,
structures related to leasing arrangements and project financing, including a
special purpose vehicle receiving financing to develop and/or construct the
project for which Purchaser [or Agent] purchased the Equipment [add
requirement of  delivery of  &rep letter8 from Enron regarding financing
sufficiency], or (d) final payment (except for the retention amount) has been
made to Seller;  (ii) is a direct competitor of Seller in the turbine
manufacturing business, (iii) is an adverse party to Seller in any material
litigation, or (iv) if purchasing the Equipment, such assignee is not
purchasing such Equipment (or rights thereto) as part of a transaction in
which Purchaser, Agent or their Affiliates is providing related goods and/or
services to such assignee.

Purchaser or Agent shall have the right to assign or pledge, from time to
time, all or any portion of their respective right, title and interest in, to
and under the Agreement as collateral for financing of this Facility without
Seller,s consent.

In the instances where consent is required, the party requesting consent
shall request such consent in writing, including the following:

(a) the legal name and address and the form and place of incorporation or
organization of the proposed assignee;

(b) the current published annual report of the proposed assignee, or if no
such report is published three years of audited financial statements and a
description of the proposed assignee,s business, if available; and

(c) [a descriptive list of power generation projects completed by the
assignee during the preceding five years].

Seller shall respond to any request for consent within thirty (30) days
following its receipt of such request.   Seller,s consent if granted shall be
in the form of Appendix __ hereto.  Any failure to respond in writing within
the foregoing period shall be deemed to constitute consent.

When duly assigned in accordance with this Article, (including, following any
collateral assignment, upon foreclosure by any collateral assignee), (i) this
Agreement or the rights and/or obligations so assigned shall be binding upon
and shall inure to the benefit of the assignee (and all rights and/or
obligations so assigned, including, without limitation, any and all warranty
rights, shall be assigned to the assignee as if such assignee were an
original party hereto), (ii) the assignor shall be irrevocably relieved of
and forever discharged from all liability under this Agreement so long as the
assignee executes an assumption of this Agreement and such liabilities and
obligations herein, and (iii) Seller shall look only to such assignee for the
performance of the obligations so assigned.  Any assignment other than as
permitted herein shall be void and without force or effect.


Thanks! You guys are adorable. When I become technologically advanced enough
to get a picture of myself onto the computer, I promise to send it over. In
the meatime, just picture me as a Cindy Crawford type, only thinner. :-)

And on the subject of the BPA deal - I just spoke with Val Sabo, who's
working with Greg Wolfe and Tim Belden to get this deal done. Apparently it's
a good deal; it was put into the system and calculated, then taken out and is
currently being re-negotiated. When Greg and Tim come to an agreement with
BPA, they will most likely send you a revised confirmation. So in the
meantime, Val says to hold off doing anything. We'll keep you posted.

Thanks for checking up on this.

Kate

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           01/05/2001 08:28 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Hey

Just thought it would be a nice idea if you knew who you were talking to in
the Houston office.

Left to right: Kimberly Hundl, Stephanie Piwetz, Kimberly Indelicato, not an
EPMI employee & Amy Heffernan

Have a great day!

KI


Now that the accrual book is fresh on your mind, I would like to propose the
following for Schedule C prudency:

1)  Monetize $20 million of the 2001 accrual gas position to be utilized for
the following Schedule C prudency accounts:

$10 million against the JEA (Northern Florida) short position (170,000 MWh's
on-peak).   We have mid-marketers attempting to buy energy for 01 and 02 in
FL, however, the market is extremely tight with no competitive offers.   The
JEA position is covered with FPL non-firm power, therefore, we are exposed to
on-peak price volatility due to FPL economic curtailment during load
management periods.
$3 million against the VEPCO market-based call option with a look back audit
on pricing.  This deal is an absolute pain in the ass because we are forced
to quote a price to VEPCO that is representative of an actual transaction at
reasonable prices with a rationale counterparty in the SE market.  They can
call on the MW daily, weekly, or monthly.   We can lose as much as $2-3
million/yr on this BS position due to the logistical issues and look back
audit rights that VEPCO has.
$2 million against the MJMUC (inside Associated Electric Coop) 40 MW 7x24
short position in a transmission constrained market area with absolutely no
liquidity.  We have this position marked against the Entergy curves, however,
physical delivery is a major issue which creates curtailment (and LD$)
uncertainty.
$5 million against the OPPD 110 MW daily shaped call (with hourly
flexibility) that is nearly impossible to hedge cleanly.   OPPD is in
Southern MAPP (Nebraska) and delivery risks are significant.  The total deal
is in our books at negative $25 million (10/2/00 curves) and we potentially
have an additional $5 million of exposure due to illiquid nature of MAPP,
scalar risk, and physical delivery risk.

We have several other customer deals that have hair, however, they are
generally more manageable from a physical delivery standpoint.   Each of the
deals above are in illiquid markets with delivery problems and scheduling
flexibility for the counterparty that is incosistent with the current power
trading market.   For these generic reasons and the specific issues outlined
above, I am recommending Schedule C prudency for the amounts indicated
above.
From my standpoint, it is prudent and appropriate to use $20 million from gas
accrual gains to finance these prudency positions.

Let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's       Interest Rates   US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   2.5%  0.15%  3.75%  4.5%  1.75-2.75%       [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  USD Hits New Multi-Week Highs As Recovery Story Continues  October 23, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8884 $/JPY..122.67 GBP/$..1.4207 $/CHF..1.6658  USD Hits New Multi-Week Highs As Recovery Story Continues by Jes Black  At 9:00:00 AM US BTM/UBSW sales (exo n/a, prev -1.3%) US Redbook (exp 0.7%, prev 0.6%) Event: Chairman Greenspan to speak at 8:00 AM to a meeting of the American Bankers' Association in Washington  The dollar added to Monday's gains, reaching fresh multi-week highs across the board on continued optimism for the US economic future. There is confidence the US economy can recover from this terrible third quarter and this is being reflected in US equity market strength and subsequently the dollar. USD hit six-week highs of 88.72 vs. EUR and 1.6674 against CHF in European trade after a sleepy Asian session. The dollar also hit fresh nine-week highs of 1.4201 against sterling and 122.84 yen.  Dealers drove the dollar higher for both domestic and external reasons. Fueling gains at home is the fact that of 225 companies in the S?500 reporting Q3 earnings so far, 85% matched or exceeded projected targets. Therefore, investors are looking ahead to an economic recovery next year and pushing up stocks now. Fears about the war on terrorism and concerns about the current economic environment have been discounted. Case in point: yesterday's surprise announcement of two deceased postal workers who were exposed to anthrax failed to substantially move the dollar lower. For that reason, the risk-aversion problem is fading for the dollar, and USD has now moved beyond September 11 attack levels. In fact, after dealers put fears of war aside they began to reassess relative growth rates amongst the majors and found the US economy to have better long-term prospects.  USD/JPY advanced above its offshore high of 122.60 to a fresh 9-week high of 122.84. Support is seen at 122.60 and the dollar's upswing may intensify should it break 122.80, where stop-loss orders are rumored to be placed. Major technical resistance is seen around 123.25. Weighing on the yen was today's economic data from Japan which showed consumer confidence fell in September fell to 36.9, down four points from June and the weakest reading since 35.2 in September 1998.   Sterling also dipped below yesterday's nine-week low of 1.4215, to a new low of 1.4208. Dealers say comments made by Bank of England member Allsopp that he was concerned by the  four-year long overvaluation of sterling  pressured the pound. Allsopp, who is an external member, said a fall in sterling's value of as much as 10% would be welcome. He also felt UK interest rates should be cut further to tackle a combination of a weakening global economy and a slowdown in UK consumer demand. Minutes of the MPC's September and October meetings, released last week, showed that when the committee voted 7-2 on September 18 for a 25 basis point rate cut, Allsopp was one of two members to vote for a half point cut.   Sterling is now hovering below the 50% Fibonacci retracement of this year's uptrend from around 1.37 to 1.48. If sterling's 6-cent slide in two weeks does not stabilize as investors take profit from the recent sell-off, cable will target 1.4120, the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of this year's same uptrend from June. Boding well for the pound is the fact that the Bank of England appears ready to ease monetary policy again in order to bolster economic growth. The decline in September inflation below the 2.5% target will provide the central bank with leeway to cut interest rates again by another 25-bp this year and the BoE's willingness to spur growth (unlike the ECB) will benefit the pound.   EUR/USD came under further pressure on Monday following bearish economic forecasts from Germany's six leading economic institution as well as uninspiring comments from ECB members about the plunge in growth. This stands in sharp contrast with market perception that aggressive fiscal and monetary policy will pay off for investors who bet on the US recovery. Some investors chose not to wait until Thursday's ECB meeting because aside from reassurances that inflation would fall below the targeted 2.0% level by next year, the ECB appears reluctant to give another 25 basis point cut this week. This will likely keep pressure on the euro. However, even if the ECB were to lower rates, the market reaction could be muted because it has already been priced in for some time now. Therefore, the euro again finds itself in a lose/lose situation because the ECB has failed to promote growth. A break of 88.70 sees EUR/USD targeting 88.25/50 area followed by 87.25, the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of this year's uptrend from 83.45 to 93.35.  USD/CHF passed yesterday's 6-week high of 1.6640, to reach a fresh high of 1.6680. Gains against the Swiss franc highlighted the fact that the risk premium that investors paid to be in the franc has faded. USD/CHF is now above September 11 attack levels and even though the dollar has corrected against the European currencies it still has more room to rise, especially against the Swiss franc, dealers say. Target is the 1.6735 area. However, any major negative developments for the US, at home or abroad, would quickly translate into gains for the franc  Meanwhile, amid a lack of key data, dealers will await any possible direction Greenspan might give them this week from three scheduled appearances. Greenspan is scheduled to speak today at 8:00 AM at a meeting of the American Bankers' Association in Washington and has other appearances as well on Wednesday and Friday via satellite.   Dealers will also look to see if Wall Street enjoys Tuesday as well as it did yesterday in the face of earnings reports for Q3. So far, of 225 companies in the S?500 reporting Q3 earnings, 85% matched or exceeded projected targets. This has fueled gains in the Dow and Nasdaq and today's futures are up 33 and 9 points respectively. Xerox, Daimler Chrysler, and Exxon are reporting before the market open and only one major company, ATT&T, is reporting after the bell.  	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis USD Extends Broad Rally to Pre Sep 11 Highs       Articles & Ideas  EURO: German IFO Will Remind ECB to Build Growth    Dollar Comeback Stopped by Risk of Terrorism       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		  This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .


FYI.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dozier, Mike <MDozier@caiso.com>
To: IEPA <IEPA@caiso.com>
Cc: Riley, Ed <ERiley@caiso.com>; Kindel, Barbara <BKindel@caiso.com>;
Malugani, Carol <CMalugani@caiso.com>; Timson, David <DTimson@caiso.com>;
Jaschke, Allen <AJaschke@caiso.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:33 PM
Subject: ISO Requirements for Generating Unit Direct Telemetry

> Independent Energy Producers Association (IEP) Representatives:
>
> The attached letter requests your assistance in providing information to
IEP
> members regarding the ISO's recently-adopted requirements for direct
> telemetry from Generating Units that are providing -- or intend to provide
> -- Ancillary Services (other than Regulation) to the ISO.  Those
> requirements provide that such Generating Units utilize the Data
Processing
> Gateway (DPG) technology for direct telemetry effective as of June 1,
2001.
> We are particularly interested in ensuring that owners of Generating Units
> that may currently be operating under the terms of existing power purchase
> agreements be aware of the ISO requirements in advance of termination of
> those agreements so that they may plan and budget for the installation of
> the DPG technology in a timely manner.
>
> If time permits, we would also request that you inform IEP members of the
> ISO's December 7 stakeholder meeting to discuss DPG requirements, among
> other matters.
>
> Your assistance in disseminating the information contained in the attached
> letter is greatly appreciated.  A hard copy of the attached letter will be
> provided by FedEx.  Please feel free to contact me or one of the ISO
> employees identified in the attached letter if you have any questions.
> Thank you.
>
> Mike Dozier
> ISO Manager of Contracts
> (916) 608-5708
>
> >  <<Smutny-Jones IEP.GCP DPG QF Letter 001130.doc>>
> >
>

 - Smutny-Jones IEP.GCP DPG QF Letter 001130.doc


dinner around 7ish will be fine - but we will come  out earlier to help out
and have drinks

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 01/18/2001 10:10:46 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Houses

Hi Eric,

I don't think you want to look at it.  Notice that it is just one block from
the railroad tracks.  Talk about noise!

What time do you want to have dinner Saturday night?  I just got back from
the grocery store so everything is ready to prepare.  I will email Shanna
next.  Talk to you in a bit.  LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Houses

> I went by some houses last night . . .
>
>
> This house was by far the nicest and best bang for your buck, but in a
suspect neighborhood - it looks like they are building a lot of townhouses
> close though
> check it out . . .
> http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=203161
>
> These were nice too - more contemporary though . . .
> http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=389305
>
> We should probably go look at these on Sunday.
>
> Love,
> e
>


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/25/2001>, published as of 09/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 6)


Your stomach has to produce a new layer of mucus every two weeks otherwise it
will digest itself.


whenever - I am going to leave here pretty soon.  So whenever the best time for you is, just let me know.  Is the car ready?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	megan rogers <megrogers_99@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 10:45 AM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Subject:

I have your palm.  The guy from Archer called me this
morning.  Have you had a chance to call him???
What time do you want to pick up the car?

Megan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com


If you would like a copy of the information  Mary references below, please
advise me via e-mail and I will make sure you receive a copy.  The notice is
attached. Please VIEW from Lotus Notes.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/17/2000 12:01 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mary Hain                           11/16/2000 05:23 PM

To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Orders/Notices

Please download the PX's pricing report and copy for any of the real time,
day traders, mid marketers, fundies and orig people who express interest.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 05:26 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
11/16/2000 07:18 AM

To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>,
<marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Orders/Notices

Please see attached.  One of the Notices is for the CalPX's report entitled:
Price Movements in California Power Exchange Markets:  Analysis of Price
Activity; May-September 2000.  If you would like a copy, please let me know.
Thanks.

 - EC96-19.1


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 05:44 PM -----

	Jeff Blumenthal
	07/11/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: questionnaire on Internet trading on commodities.DOC

Carol,

I've reviewed the attached questionnaire and have the following comments:

1.  Section 5. --  I am not aware of any restrictions on the ability of a
non-Mexican entity to offer financial derivatives to Mexican counterparties
where such countparties are "vetted" before trading commences.  It seems
that, for so long as derivatives are not offered to the public at-large, then
such an offerings can be made.

2.  Section 9(c) -- A withholding tax, as well as value-added tax, will apply
to payments made by a Mexican counterparty to a non-Mexican entity pursuant
to certain financial derivative transactions.  In addition, a non-Mexican
entity making payment to a Mexican counterparty will be required to pay
Mexican value-added tax pursuant to those certain transactions.  (Please
refer to the e-mail that I sent yesterday, which indicates that payments
pursuant to those 16 financial derivative transaction descriptions provided
to me by Jaime Williams will not be subject to any Mexican withholding or VAT
tax since they fall outside of the regime that would otherwise subject such
payments to Mexican tax.)  I have been working extensively with Mexican tax
counsel on these issues, so please consider Rich, Heather y Mueller's "No"
response as relevant only to a tax applicable to transactions conducted
through the internet (and not with respect to the underlying transaction).

Please call me at ext. 35777 with any questions.

Best regards.

   Carol St Clair                07/11/2000 09:53 AM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: questionnaire on Internet trading on commodities.DOC

Jeff:
FYI.  Let me know if you have any thoughts on this.  Mark and I hope to talk
with Pablo sometime tomorrow.
Carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 09:52 AM -----

	"Pablo Perezalonso" <pperezalonso@rhm.com.mx>
	07/07/2000 08:52 PM

		 To: carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: questionnaire on Internet trading on commodities.DOC

  Attached please find an initial draft of the questionaire. We are still
working on it and we will send a revised draft next week.

Regards

Pablo Perezalonso Egu?a
Ritch, Heather y Mueller, S.C.
pperezalonso@rhm.com.mx
tel: (52) 5-2076533

 - questionnaire on Internet trading on commodities.DOC


TOPIC(S):  Bushton Salt Storage
 DATE:  Monday, December 11
LOCATION:  691
TIME:  1:30-3:00 pm


The T3 new disk storage technology and new database server for TAGG/ERMS
database were successfully implemented last weekend. No problems have been
reported. Nagesh and Ramesh reported performance improvement of CPR and
RisktRAC. Although users have not noticed significant improvement of the
system, we believe that performance gain will be seen when system load is
high and that the new disk storage technology will provide us with better
fall-tolerance and better performance in the long run.

I want to thank everyone involved in the implementation for the good work.
Special thanks go to Michael Barber for his sacrifice of first two days of
his vacation to configure the new server and disk and for his excellent work
during the implementation. Many thanks also go to the DBAs, Alex Hsieh, Brian
Ngo, Soo-Lian Ervin and Mable Tang for their diligent work in making database
migration and performance measurement and in making sure of a smooth database
migration. I want to specifically thank Nagesh Kavi for his great efforts of
coordinating all system testing among development groups. I also want to
thank Malcolm Wells, Wilford Stevens, Terry Sanvido, Dave Commensen and Jay
Krish for their active support during the implementation. Many thanks also go
to the Ganapathy Ramesh, Jeremy Wong, Ed Calderon, Dave Wei, Senthil
Mayilsamy, Narasim Kasaru, Nayan Dattani, Ron Nolte and Mike Swain for their
hardworking in testing all applications of related systems. Special thanks
also go to Unify team for having made the implementation by the end of year
2000 possible by swapping the server and the new T3 disks with TAGG/ERMS and
for their cooperation during the implementation. Last but not least, I want
to thank Jeff Gossett, Kam Keiser, Errol Mclaughli, Michelle Bruce, Shifali
Sharma, John Swinney and Stacey White for their efforts of performing user
acceptance testing on the New Year Eve day.

Thanks

Zhiyong


I would like to invite each of you to participate in a brainstorming session
with me on Friday, January 12 from 8:30 am through lunch.  The purpose of
this meeting will be to surface and capture ideas around the potential
commercialization of mid and back office services that we provide.  I know
that many of you have ideas about services and/or products that could be
marketed and some of you have been involved in arrangements where we have or
are currently providing services to outside parties.  While there are efforts
underway with certain modules under CommodityLogic, I want this session to be
used to take a broader look at how we might market mid and back office
services.  I hope that you will be able to attend.

Details on location of the meeting and more exact timing will be sent to you
on Monday when Patti returns from vacation.


Martin - You gave me Jeff George rather than Eddie George. - I don't want to
use all my points to pick him back up in Free Agency.

QB - Steve McNair
RB - Jeff George
RB - Tim Biak.
WR - Iasaac Bruce
WR - Tim Brown
WR - Jerry Rice
K & D - Tennessee

Why do I like my team better than those 2nd place - NY Tailors?


Dale:
I will be sending you the CA's some time this morning.  I needed to wait till
we had our conference with the investment bankers, CSFB, to know which
companies were going to the second round.  I did not want to send you the
CA's of companies that were not going on to the second round.  Please give me
a call if you have any questions.
Ben


SU was fun, but there was  a little incident with a streaker (more like a
stroller on stage).  Otherwise, it was great.  Paige did really well, and she
was front and center for most of their act.

I don't know what we are going to do about Thanksgiving.  Neil and I are
negotiating. I neglected to discuss it with Paige this weekend, of course.
It is hard to believe it is only a few weeks away.

Michael and I are both better, although he didn't get better until Friday
night.

Hi to all!

Love,

Kay

"Lisa Clarke" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 10/30/2000 04:21:28 PM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Hi!

Hello!

How did things go in Georgetown? I just wanted to see how it went and tell
you again how sorry I am that things did not work out so that we could see
you. Also, are yall going to Palacios for Thanksgiving? Are you staying at
the bed and breakfast? I think we are going to come down on Saturday morning
and we were thinking about getting a room for that night. Bobby claims that
the pink house becomes the house of snores when we all stay there. He may
have a point!

Are you and Michael feeling better??

Love you!

Lisa


Ken:

Yesterday, we received a copy of your letter to Sanjiv Sidhu.  Thank you so
much for writing the letter to him on our behalf.   I will call today to see
if he has time to visit with us.

On another note, we will be starting our campaign on September 29th
(limited for the weekend, and saturation starting after the Olympics on
October 2nd) for two weeks.    We will continue to raise money, and go up
after that as the money comes in, but we felt the time is right to inform
the public on Social Security.

To update you on monies received from your appeal, they are; Willie
Alexander $500; Ben Love $1K; Gay Lauderdale, Williams, $25K; Bob
McNair,$25K.  Thank you for your help on this.

I will keep you posted.     Again, thank you.

Jeanette N. Goodman

 - winmail.dat


Mr. Olfati,

You could contact Greg Piper to discuss.  You can reach Greg at 713-853-6161.

Thank you,
Joannie

Enzo Olfati <holfati@ispheres.com> on 03/19/2001 10:40:03 AM
To: "Jeffrey K. Skilling (E-mail)" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: advanced arbitrage enabling technology out of Caltech

Jeff,

I'd like to introduce you to?our company?and set-up a?one-hourconference
call?and discussion with you?and/or?someone you?trustto evaluate?this
opportunity.

iSpheres Corporationisco-founded by the Chairman of  Computer Science
Department at California Institute of Technology.

iSpheres enables dynamic arbitrage opportunities in commodities  trading.
With iSpheres, trading firms wrap applications like steel  marketplaces,
energy marketplaces, demand planning systems, and production  planning
systems as components, and derive additional business value by  monitoring
these components for real time interdependent events and then  reacting to
those?composite events  based on business rules.

iSpheres provides a software framework for developing and deploying these
loosely-coupled Web Services or Meta-Applications. These applications are
assembled from multiple components, each of which was previously itself an
application and data source, to enable new business processes.

For example, a $22 billion investment bank uses the iSpheres Meta
Application Framework,?to  detect and react to interdependent market events.
This enables them to optimize  and automate the acquisition and response to
relevant dynamic?events in  their Market Intelligence information
environment.

The build out of the Internet and the rapid  deployment of eBusiness
applications over last several years has established the  need and created
the ability to build and deploy loosely-coupled Web Services or  Meta
Applications.

Please advise, otherwise I'll  follow up with you in 3-5 days.
Thanks,

H. Enzo Olfati
Account Manager
www.iSpheres.com
tel.978.461.4840 direct.510.302.6767

P.S.?I have also  e-mailed this to others at Enron?to determine the
appropriate contacts  to?have the discussion  with.


Once again today I participated in the discussions on possible electricity
legislation held in the offices of Majority Whip Tom DeLay with other
interested parties including industry segments, public power and state
regulators.  The other congressional participants were staff to Reps. Steve
Largent and Chip Pickering.

After meeting all week (except Wednesday), the group was unable to reach an
agreement or even a provisional consensus on what could be placed in an
electricity title that could be added to the comprehensive energy package
that the House Energy and Commerce Committee will begin to process next
week.  Congressional staff will report to their bosses on the status of the
discussions as of this afternoon and from there the Members will determine
whether to proceed further.  There is a general perception that committee
leaders will elect NOT to take up electricty legislation at this time and in
the context of the broader package in the absence of broadly supported
legislation.

In the end, the discussions did not bear fruit because divisions remained
over the usual issues and along most of the usual fault lines.  As the drafts
progressed during the week, we succeeded in deleting the original language
that would have had Congress weigh into the bundled/unbundled and
federa/state jurisdictional rules at the very time that likely adverse action
in Congress could in turn adversely impact the Supreme Court case.

A last minute attempt was made by the congressional staff to stitch together
a minimalist electricity title that would have included reliability (with the
understanding that the NERC discussions could produce modifications more to
our liking), PUHCA repeal, PURPA reform, interconnection language and federal
siting.  However, in each instance there were one more politically relevant
interest groups not willing to go along.  Cong. DeLay's staff also tried to
link PUHCA repeal to those who had joined an RTO.

There was also an attempt to strip it down to reliability, interconnection
and siting (eminent domain) -- but again there was either disagreement on the
details or objection from those who favorite subject was left out of the
minimalist package.

There was one rather interesting discussion when the public power folks
floated language on market power that included a sentence that would have
made the filed rate doctrine inapplicable to antitrust challenges to market
rates.  Needless to say, I strongly objected as did EPSA and others.

As noted, the lack of an agreement reduces our exposure when the mark up
occurs.  In the absence of an electricity title, refund, price control and
other issues should not be germane to the package that the subcommittee will
take up on Tuesday and the full committee next Friday.  That package will
have five issues addressed: conservation, clean coal, hyrdo, nuclear and
reformulated gasoline.  Details to follow once legislative language is
released.


Please send me the details of the nomination error when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Mike


little exageration never hurts........remember....he's fourteen!

he's the man!


Please note on your calendars:   the PGE Risk Management meeting originally
scheduled for October 24th has been rescheduled to October 29 from 1:45-3:15
pm PST.

To participate in the discussion, please use the following number:

503-464-2663

Thank you.


What do you thnk about amazon gift certificates of $30.00 to the group?

Let's put the "Tick" on selling mojave index for feb-oct 2001.  heavy orig if
he can find a nice market.

Let's put Ina on the west desk trip for Feb.  We should book it now to send a
nice message to the group after our last cancellation.

Grigsby


Steve,

Thanx.

Vince


I have reviewed the La Plata Facilities O&O Agreement.  Lee, could you please review the same and see if you agree with this assessment?  It appears to me that the pigging facilties could qualify as either of the following:

Special Services.  This would be subject to prior written consent and agreement between the Operator (TW) and the Operating Committee (TW & NWPLRepresentatives).  If NWPL agreed, their share of the cost would be in proportion to their ownership interest.  If we did obtain their approval, future O&M cost attributable to the pigging facilities could be shared among the owners.  (We've agreed to a flat fee for 2000 through 2003 with a 3.5% escalator starting in 2001.)

Addition or Expansion.  Demonstrate that the pigging will add incremental transmission capacity. We have to give notice to NWPL and they have 60 days to participate.  If they participate, they share in the cost at their ownership interest, but they get a share of the incremental capacity at their ownership interest.  If they don't indicate a desire to participate in 60 days, we can proceed with the Expansion (without any approval, but also no cost sharing).  Also, any incremental O&M associated with an expansion cannot be passed on to any owners not participating in such expansion.

I think if we went the Special Services route, we would need to justify the need for these facilities to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the facilities at current levels.  I think we would spend alot of time arguing this with them and in the end they would probably approve it subject to them not incurring any cost.  (They probably don't have $260,000 ($1.5MM * .174) sitting around in a budget somewhere that they'd like to fork over for these facilities.)  Rich, what do you think?  How difficult would it be to demonstrate that these facilities are necessary for maintaining the current operating levels of the facilities?

Recommendation:  To save us the 60 days notice period of an Expansion, I think we should notify them that it's a necessary Special Service and ask for approval (& to pass along their share of the cost), but to be prepared to eat 100% of the costs to obtain their timely approval and proceed with the installation of the facilities.  In this event we would need to agree on the inclusion of future O&M attributable to these facilities.

FYI, their ownership interest is still officially 22.3% since they have not executed the Amendment that has been tendered to them 3 times, first by me and twice by Lynn Blair.  If	they execute the Amendment that incorporates the 4/1/98 expansion of the facilities, their ownership interest will be 17.4%.


Attached is the Weekly Report for week ending October 6.  For those
interested in the electric industry, please note the complaint filed by
California Municiapl Utilities Association today requesting a reinstatement
of cost-based rates in Calfiornia.

Also attached is the Commission agenda for the next public meeting
The Order No. 637 Watch Reprot is updated.

Lastly, Chairman Hoecker's speech to Congress is attached.


Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of May 21 - 25, 2001

Paul Kaufman

Mon  5/21  Houston TX
Tue  5/22  Houston TX
Wed  5/23  Portland OR office, a.m.; Helena, p.m.
Thur  5/24  Helana
Fri  5/25  Portland OR office

Sue Mara

Mon  5/21  San Francisco CA office, a.m.;
10 - 4 Real-TIme Pricing Workshop [2 pm Dentist]
Tue  5/22  San Francisco CA office
Wed  5/23  San Francisco CA office
Thur  5/24  ISO Board, Folsom and IEP Board, Sacramento
Fri  5/25  San Francisco CA office, a.m.;
9 - 11 AReM Meeting
Vacation beginning 11:30 am

Jeff Dasovich

Mon  5/21  San Francisco CA office
Tue  5/22  San Francisco CA office
Wed  5/23  San Francisco CA office
Thur  5/24  Vacation
Fri  5/25  Vacation

Sandi McCubbin

Mon  5/21  Sacramento CA
Tue  5/22  Sacramento CA
Wed  5/23  Sacramento CA
Thur  5/24  Sacramento CA
Fri  5/25  Vacation

Mona Petrochko

Mon  5/21  Dallas TX
Tue  5/22  Washington DC
Wed  5/23  Houston TX
Thur  5/24  Houston TX
Fri  5/25  San Francisco CA

Alan Comnes

Mon  5/21  Portland OR office
Tue  5/22  Portland OR office
Wed  5/23  Portland OR office
Thur  5/24  Portland OR office
Fri  5/25   Portland OR office


Kay,

Here are the drawing numbers for the stacks that we talked about yesterday.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/03/2000 08:42
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 10/02/2000 05:01:35 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Enron Change Order/Stacks

Chris,

Please use these drawing numbers for reference in the purchase change orders
for the exhaust stacks.

Thanks,

Lee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Storm, Michael E (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 4:21 PM
> To: Lee Johnson
> Subject: Enron Change Order/Stacks
>
> Lee,
>
> Hope this will work for the Change order
>
> Drawings are as follows:
>
> 45 Ft Heavy Base  BM-6000-X-45HVY
>
> 45 Ft extension  BM-6000-EXT-45
>
> 45 Ft Standard Base BM-6000-X-45
>
> Mike Storm
>
>  g   S&S Energy Products
>  ___________________________________
>     A GE Power Systems Business
>  Michael E. Storm
>  Projects
>  Phone: (281) 457-9601  Dial Com 351-9601
>  Fax:  (281) 862-1611, Pager 888 487 5741
>


Ruth,
Here is an estimated November purchase.  Crestone won't have final measurement until next week.

Call me if you have any questions.

Theresa


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042323.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


I am looking forward to the salad.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Sally,

Thank you again for passing my resume to Ted Murphy. His recruiter is trying
to work the scheduling between myself and the six people that Ted wants me
to meet with. It is all very positive and I appreciate all your help.

I am also very interested in Enron Broadband Services on the commercial
side. With my options and structuring background, I believe that it would be
a great fit. What would be the best way to get my resume in front of Ken
Rice or the right person in his group? I am attaching an electronic copy for
easy forwarding.

Thank you

Rob

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

 - RStalford415.doc


Louise

This isn't quite how I recall it looking yesterday. If my memory serves me
well, your sketch showed - all in one line:

"You want to buy 20000 from Enron"

What you have sent today shows:

"You want to buy 20000...
[product short description]
from Enron for 2.18"

To me, this is less clear. Would it not be simpler, and completely
unambiguous, to state:

"You want to buy from Enron 20000
[product short description]
for 2.18"

Similarly, "You want to sell to Enron 20000
[product short description]
for 2.18"

Regards
Christopher
___________________________________________

Christopher Millard, Clifford Chance
200 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4JJ, England
Voice: +44 171 956 0023 / Fax: +44 171 600 5555
Email: christopher.millard@cliffordchance.com
Web: http://www.cliffordchance.com
___________________________________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lkitchen@enron.co.uk [SMTP:lkitchen@enron.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 9:36 AM
> To: Christopher.Millard@CliffordChance.com; ssefton@enron.co.uk;
> jboyd@enron.co.uk; Mark - ECT Legal Taylor; David Forster;
> jjuggins@enron.co.uk; Elena Kapralova; Edmund Cooper;
> gilbergd@sullcrom.com; Timothy.Hughes@CliffordChance.com;
> Charlotte.Stalin@CliffordChance.com
> Subject: Re: FINAL AGENDA FOR LEGAL SIGN OFF MEETING - MONDAY 9TH
> AUGUST
>
>
>
> AS AGREED BY ALL OF YOU YESTERDAY - see attachment
>
> Long day yesterday, but thanks for everyone's help I think we made a lot
> of
> progress.
>
>
> (See attached file: Transaction Screen.doc) << File: Mac Word 3.0 >>

***********************************************************************

The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). This
information may be subject to legal professional or other privilege or may
otherwise be protected by work product immunity or other legal rules.  It
must not be disclosed to any person without our authority.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not
disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it.


<! >
<! >
<! ATTENTION!>
<! You are reading this message because your mail reader cannot display HTML.>
<! If you would prefer to receive text messages from now on,>
<! click the link below or copy it into a web browser.>
<!
http://208.50.155.100/ClickAction?func=S_TurnOffHtml&partname=columbiahouse_music&uid=84715283
>
<! >

<title></title>

11.23.01

	Dear Paul,

Skip the stress of Holiday shopping -- it´s easy to make them holly and
jolly with ColumbiaHouse.com Gift Certificates. Plus, you can already
pick up Angie Stone´s just out new set!

	Unlimited 60% off...No full-price purchase necessary! (plus shipping and handling)

	(plus shipping & handling) details

expires: 12/4/01

Start Shopping

<form method="get" action="http://www.columbiahouse.com/soft?">

<input type="hidden" name="memid" value="kv73eg9nam9z4x5e4gjm">

<input type="hidden" name="olc" value="8eac91mbj7">

<input type="hidden" name="tk" value="9471">

		<select name="searchtype">

		<option value="ARTIST">Artist</option>

		<option value="ALBUM">Album</option>

		<option value="MUSIC_PULL_NO">selection#</option>

		</select>

		<input type="text" size="10" name="searchfor">

		<input type="image" src="http://images.columbiahouse.com/ch/images/se2/email/go_button.gif" border="0">

 Alternative

 Classical

 Christian

 Country

 Dance

 Gospel

 Hard/Metal

 Jazz/Blues

 Latin

 Light & Easy

 New Age/World

 R&B

 Rap

 Rock

 Soft Rock/Pop

 Soundtracks

 Holiday

 Bestsellers

 Bargain Titles

 Web Extras

 50 Music Milestones

 Deluxe Box Sets

 Greatest Hits

</form>

		Give Them The Gift Of Music!
ColumbiaHouse.com Gift Certificates

		details

			Don´t know what to get 'em this holiday? Let them click for their own
perfect present with our brand new Gift Certificates! Not only can your
family and friends order the latest and greatest music, they can take
their pick from thousands of the hottest DVDs and videos around. It´s shopping made simple!

			Go Shopping!

		Angie Stone´s latest "Mahogany Soul" featuring the hit
Brotha.
Angie Stone "Mahogany Soul"

		details

			JUST RELEASED -- and we´ve already got it! The retro-soul star is
back and she´s givin' it up for good guys everywhere with Brotha
and the bonus remix, Brotha (Part II) featuring Alicia
Keys and Eve. "Soul" also sways to the beat of the O´Jays-sampled Wish I Didn´t Miss You and the Musiq Soulchild duet The Ingredients Of Love.

			Go Shopping!

		The Holiday Gift Center

		Skip the long lines and crowded parking lots -- it´s a snap to wrap up
your Holiday shopping at our Gift Center! Here´s just a few of the great
gifts you´ll find:

				Stevie Wonder

At The Close Of A Century

				Save 34%! 70 wonderful songs -- from Superstition and You Are
The Sunshine Of My Life to Living For The City and My
Cherie Amour -- plus a great 96-page color booklet.

				Various Artists

Pop Music: The Modern Era

				A 2 CD set -- just $2.99! Features 38 monster hits from Lauryn
Hill, Billy Joel, Aerosmith, Bruce Springsteen,
Herbie Hancock, Michael Jackson and many more.

				Enya

Paint The Sky With Stars

				The red-hot singer collects 16 of her very best Celtic-spiced stunners,
including Orinoco Flow, Marble Halls, Caribbean
Blue, Shepherd Moons, Watermark and 2 exclusive cuts.

				Linkin Park

Hybrid Theory

				One of the year´s biggest breakouts! Bizkit-sized riffs and heavy
grooves collide on the new hit In The End, One Step Closer
and Crawling.

			Start Shopping Now!

Gladiator, The Matrix, Meet the Parents, Charlie´s Angels, Pay It
Forward and many more! Get 4 DVDs for 49 cents each (plus shipping &
handling)! Click here to join our DVD Club.

From Holiday gifts to up-to-the-minute hits, you´ll find it all at
ColumbiaHouse.com -- stop by now!

Thanks,

	This Columbia House Special Offers Mail is an exclusive service for Club members. If you wish to unsubscribe to this email, click here to update your email preferences or reply to this message with "unsubscribe" in the subject line. You are subscribed as plucci@enron.com.

To ensure that the "unsubscribe process" has been completed successfully please allow 2 weeks. We do apologize for any interim emails that are received while we are updating our records.

Thank you for shopping at ColumbiaHouse.com.

Copyright © 2001 ColumbiaHouse.com All rights reserved.

kv73eg9nam9z4x5e4gjm


Attached is a file that has all of the Central Region EOL products.  EOL needs to reassign trader names and books to these products.  I realize that not all products will initially be active, but we are in the process of getting everything ready for the restart of trading business.  Just put a trader name in column H for the corresponding EOL product.  If you have any questions, let me know.  Thanks.

DG


Please remove me from the Clickpaper.com approval list, and replace me with
Julia Murray or her designee.

Thanks

	Tana Jones
	10/04/2000 08:57 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Clickpaper Approvals 10/3/00

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	10/03/2000 06:10 PM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Clickpaper Approvals 10/3/00

The Clickpaper approvals for 10/3/00 are attached below.

Regards,
tm


Can you confirm that the listed Liquid Payments Netting Agreements would not apply to power-related receivables held by Enron Power Marketing, Inc.?

Thanks
-----------------------------------------
Trey Cash
713.853.6935 (voice)
281.664.4767 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winn, Melinda
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Cash, Trey; Ephross, Joel
Subject:	FW: Master Netting Agreements

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Winn, Melinda
Subject:	FW: Master Netting Agreements

Attached is a copy of the master netting assignments list that sets forth those that are signed and/or currently being worked on.  As you can see, BP Amoco, Dynegy and Reliant have recently been executed.  A master crude netting agreement has been signed with ConAgra.  Liquid payments netting agreements have been signed with Coastal, Conoco, Morgan Stanley, Sunoco and Valero.  Master Netting Agreements have previously been executed with PG&E, The New Power Company and Entergy-Koch Trading, LP.

Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie
x33907

		 << File: MASTER NETTING AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENTS.doc >>
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: Master Netting Agreements

Please let Melinda know.  Don't forget to include PGE and New Power.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winn, Melinda
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Cc:	Ephross, Joel; Cash, Trey
Subject:	Master Netting Agreements

Mary, could you tell me which parties have executed the agreements and which are currently in negotiation?

	Thanks,
	Melinda


I just wanted to thank all the girls and the parents for the autographed t-shirt and the restaurant gift certificate.  I really appreciate it.  I had a lot of fun working with the girls.  They were all so enthusiastic and committed to the team effort.  It was very rewarding for me to see how the team came together and improved so much.  The girls have a lot to be proud of.  I hope to see everyone in the spring soccer program or next fall.  Thanks again to all the parents for your efforts and time commitment, especially to Terry, Jon and Vicki.

Have a great holiday season.

Take care,

Susan Pereira

P.S. - Terry, could you forward this on to the Reeses, please?  I don't have their email address.  Thanks.


We are doing commercial this morning, have we got the other numbers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Killen, Faith
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 8:13 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	FW: First Pass at NETCO

Who can I work with to get the first names of the individuals listed for Gas Trading, as well as the split between structuring/fundamentals/trading? (I see some of the latter in the name column, is that the entire group? it would be helpful to have them grouped separately.) In a lot of cases there are several listing for some names, and they appear to be IT people. We're building a plan based on title, so that's why I need this info. Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 5:43 PM
To:	Killen, Faith
Subject:	First Pass at NETCO

 << File: NETCO 2pm312.xls >>

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


I'm so glad your going! I signed up to go shopping.  I'd love to join you
guys for dinner!

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 04/26/2001 01:55 PM CDT
To: Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Hi!!!

I'll be there.  I didn't sign up for the organized activities.  I'll just be
hanging out.  The Swap Group is having dinner Wednesday night, if you haven't
already made plans do you want to join us, we're about 15 in number right now!

	Andrea Calo@ENRON
	04/26/2001 01:07 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hi!!!

Hey Tana,

I haven't seen you on any activity list for the conference.  Will  you be
attending?

Regards,

Andrea


Lorraine, I dont have a problem with continuation of this sampling, but we
better hear from our conservative tight fisted attorney first....

Lorraine Lindberg
11/10/2000 02:02 PM
To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: PNM PCB testing

I am in the process re-negotiating PNM's FT on TW.  PNM has requested that TW
continue to sample for contaminants at Rio Puerco, Belen and Ft. Wingate on a
semi-annual basis during the term of the new contract which could be as long
as five years out from 10/01.  Are we planning on continuing to sample these
points in the East of Thoreau area?  Are there any objections to agreeing to
this sampling?

Thanks for your quick reply.

Lorraine


The Senate voted on the Interior Appropriations Bill late yesterday.  Our
amendment passed, which prevents either BLM or the Forest Service from
enacting new fiber optic federal lands rights-of-way policies.  The BLM made
a last ditch effort to defeat this in the Senate, but we had reached key
Senators and staff and they got nowhere.

Action now moves to Conference, which for us means a focus on the House
Conference members.  Scott and I will spend the next 2 days meeting with the
key Republicans in the House.  We've already recruited the important
Democrats.  Interior Approps Subcommittee Chairman Regula remains opposed, at
least publicly, but we think we can get other Members to swing him.  We trust
he'll come up with a sensible, face saving compromise on his own, eg,
formally beginning a review process with his Subcommittee having oversight --
at this point, our language literally forbids BLM or Forest Service from even
meeting to discuss the issue.

We continue, though, on several other fronts:

1. We have the New Dems writing OMB on the issue and several Senators and
Congressmen writing BLM and USFS
2. We've increased the pressure on the White House, and are letting them know
through very senior back door channels that in our opinion, BLM/Forest
Service have not gotten the message.  Our position is that we'll be satisfied
that they've changed their evil ways when the new assessment on the Mt. Hood
EBS build is retracted.
3. We're preparing both Senate and House authorizing Committees for the
longer-term issue next session.  We have no trouble finding champtions eager
to own the issue
4. We're engaging the Western Caucus for same
5. Our adhoc coalition continues to grow in numbers and clout with over 20
companies and associations now actively engaged.  Enron chairs this
initiative, with a tangible side benefit being much increased visibility and
stature as a serious communications player.
6. Scott is successfully engaging state and local officials to weigh in from
the end-user perspective

BLM is on the retreat and has asked for a meeting, which we've refused.   We
don't think they've given up though, and it's likely an issue of pride at
this point.  So until the Approps process concludes we're continuing with the
full court press.

Steve


I think you're missing a "solve" in last sentence.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:48 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision? Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

Thanks.  With that, unless I hear otherwise from folks by 4 PM PST---and all
suggestions on how to make the comment better are welcome and
appreciated---I'll go ahead and forward on to Art O'Donnell.

	Richard Shapiro
	11/30/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision? Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

I would say we engage on this and other issues in California  in a more
assertive manner- message is fine. Laying low and  working backchannels is
working great so far??? NOT

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:41 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision?  Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

As you know, we've been working for about an eternity to unbundle SoCalGas'
system.  90+% of the industry agreed to an unbundling solution and filed it
as a settlement at the Commission.  In opposition, muni generators and TURN
supported SoCalGas' original proposal to essentially maintain the status quo
(SoCalGas eventually came over to our side, as did Southern California
Edison).

A judge's proposed decision came out the day before Thanksgiving adopting the
settlement advocated by the muni generators and TURN.

If it weren't for the continual barrage of retrograde policy pronouncements
coming from the "new" California PUC, folks would be genuinely shocked by the
judge's proposed decision, but as things are, it was somewhat expected.

There's one silver lining:  We managed to get in both settlements an
identical provision that eliminates a substantial amount of financial risk TW
would have faced but for the provision.  So from that perspective, the choice
to go with the TURN/muni settlement and embrace the status quo does no harm.
It does considerable harm, however, when compared to the significant value
that would have been created if the judge adopted the the unbundling
settlement.

We have a chance to go on the record in a trade publication "California
Energy Markets."  Recent events might persuade us to keep a low profile
generally at this point.  On the other hand, perhaps the time is right to
start coming out of our corner just a bit and pointing out the very poor job
this Commission is doing in managing California's energy policy.  I'm
squarely on the fence at this point and am seeking feedback.  A proposed
comment is attached.

Two questions:

1) Do folks think that there's value in providing a comment?

2) If so, does this statement work, or do folks have suggestions?

Thanks,
Jeff

"The California Public Utilities Commission has a choice. It can adopt the
same, common sense natural gas policy for Southern California that,s been in
place and working well for consumers in PG&E,s service territory.  Or it
stick with the status quo, which the industry agrees is at least partially
responsible for bottlenecks and high prices in California.  The proposed
decision opts for the status quo.  That's not going to California,s natural
gas problems and it,s likely to make matters worse in California's electric
industry."


Doug,

Propane prices as promised.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
05:28 PM ---------------------------

Elena Chilkina
08/23/2000 02:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Propane prices

Vince,

Please find attached file with propane price statistics. There are two kinds
of data: (1) prompt month futures prices, no location specified, starting
from 1987; (2) index prices for different locations (North Sea, Venezuela and
Saudi Arabia), starting 1988. Source of both is Platts publications.

Please notice that price of futures in given in US cents/gallon, and index
prices in USD/MT.

Sincerely, Elena


FYI - I need to talk with Shona tomorrow to get a read on what Rick wants
here.  Do you have any ideas given your on-going conversations with David
Port?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 06:07 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           04/23/2001 06:08 PM

To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Operational Issues

Focusing the right people on the right issues is always a good idea.  I would
like to visit with you to understand what you mean by "operational issues".
My team has a meeting every other Monday focused on operational risk and we
have various working groups that focus on key projects or initiatives that
vary with need.  A daily meeting on operational issues would need to have the
appropriate team members there, and I hesitate to add an additional meeting
to any key folks on my team if operational projects/initiatives are being
covered either in our Monday operational risk meeting or in another forum.
--Sally

From: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:55 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Operational Issues

I think the daily IT issue meeting has been quite successful in addressing
problems in systems and working toward resolution on systems related issues.
I would like to expand the scope of this meeting to include daily operational
issues as well.

I plan on restarting my attendance at these meetings on Wednesday. Can the
RAC people listed above please make a start at some of the recurring issues.

Thanks, Rick


OK.  Now either Mary Theresa Franklin or Angie needs to path out this deal in
Unify with a zero volume.

Gloria G Barkowsky
04/11/2000 12:42 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources

contract               mid                 acct              producer

8G1064             5089201        RP2109406         Devonian
8G1064             5105901        AT5105901         Devonian
8G1064             5118301        AT5118301         Devonian

Here they are - sorry it took so long to find.  Thanks, Gloria 3-7118

Chris Germany
04/04/2000 03:35 PM
To: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources

OK this is metered production on CNG.

Gloria will let us know which CNG contract to path this deal with.
The meter numbers are 50089201, 5105901, and 5118301 and this is CES
production.

After Gloria lets us know which contract(s) to use, Angie will path this deal
in Sitara with a zero volume.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 02:42
PM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           04/04/2000 02:31 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources

I believe that this is metered production.  We hav a fixed price contract
through Aug00.

Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:59 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Devonian Resources

If this is metered production then its not cut (it just flows to the pool).
If its pool gas then it probably is cut, so you tell me.  Metered production
or pool gas on CNG?

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           04/04/2000 01:39 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources

Why was this gas cut??

My Phone number is 330-493-7790.

John

Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:01 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Devonian Resources

I took the volume on deal 226742 (Devonian Resources) to 0 for April.

Hey John, give me a call when you get a chance so we can chat about this.
Also, send me your phone number.  I can't find it.


ditto -- nice work Rob.  Your insights on project stanley are also much
appreciated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/31/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
07/31/2000 07:31 AM
To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Alberta PPA

Your work on the  Alberta PPA has not gone unnoticed and really is a  model
for the rest of the group as to how to approach the review and analysis of  a
significant transaction w/ huge reg. risk-  the thoroughness and quality of
your work were top notch as was the teamwork you exhibited thoughout the
process..... not to mention the external leadership you provided on the issue
w/ folks like Larry Charach. Thanks very much!


Please print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 12:33 PM -----

	Raul Rizo-Patron
	02/20/2001 07:21 PM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Project Ice - DCF Assumptions

Below are the primary DCF assumptions:

1.  WACC = 11%

2.  EBIT from existing business was calculated as an average of 1999 and 2000
with certain adjustments.  Growth rate is 4% per annum.

3.  Financial trading earnings estimates as per John Nowlan are as follows
(urea and ammonia only):
Yr 1 - $0.5MM
Yr 2 - $2.5MM
Yr 3 - $5.0MM
Yr 4 - $7.8MM
Yr 5 and future - $10.3MM per year

4.  Origination earnings estimates as per John Nowlan are as follows (all
products):
Yr 1 - $5MM
Yr 2 - $10MM
Yr 3 - $20MM
Yr 4 - $25MM
Yr 5 - $30MM
Future - $5MM incremental earnings every year

5.  Working capital requirements continue to grow at the same pace (ie. no
efficiency in working capital assumed).

6.  $2MM of capex every three years for capital improvements (in addition to
annual maintenance items that are expensed on the Income Statement.)

Raul


Chewies on the way!!!!


Daren,

I tried to get KCS to give me the nom earlier but it is just now coming in.  The nom on Vance's spreadsheet was 7,129.  KCS is reducing the gathering piece to 5,500.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 12:26 PM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 03/28/2001 11:16:01 AM
To:	"Bob Cotten (E-mail)" <Robert.Cotten@enron.com>
cc:	Knox Westmoreland <rkw@KCSEnergy.com>, Stretch Brennan	 <djb@kcsenergy.com>, "Tom Acton (E-mail)" <Tom.Acton@enron.com>
Subject:	f.o.m. HPL nom. eff. April 1, 2001

This is the estimated Josey Ranch nomination for the month of April 2001.
The HPL nomination volume to be effective 4/1/2001 is:

			   5,500	MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
		   1,500	MMBtu/day for TEXACO
		   7,000	MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.083
@ 14.65 dry)

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers  <* )) >><
KCS Energy, Inc.
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
Voice 713-964-9434   Fax 713-877-1394


Attached is the Management Report for March 2, 2000

External Trading

 Total  2-Mar-00  To Date

 Number of Transactions   1,318   39,023
 Gross Notional Value $   637,277,968   13,129,374,294

 Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)    424,869,517

 Number of New Counterparties transacting today    4
 Number of Counterparties having transacted to date    241

 N.A. Gas

 Number of Transactions   1,127   32,294
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   261,678,370   6,471,431,520
 Gross Notional Value $   551,488,333   10,620,243,866

 UK Gas

 Number of Transactions   33   2,058
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   5,977,500   269,261,500
 Gross Notional Value $   12,330,379   541,168,873

 Belgium Gas

 Number of Transactions   1   83
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   750,000   22,600,000
 Gross Notional Value $   94,688   33,472,410

 U.S. Power

 Number of Transactions   123   3,283
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   1,202,694   26,879,287
 Gross Notional Value $   45,503,075   970,246,728

 UK Power

 Number of Transactions   2   191
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   118,548   8,922,070
 Gross Notional Value $   3,540,218   339,678,661

 Swiss Power

 Number of Transactions   -     32
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   -     55,777
 Gross Notional Value $   -     1,232,034

 German Power

 Number of Transactions   9   244
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   93,290   1,884,368
 Gross Notional Value $   1,425,850   34,600,874

 Spanish Power

 Number of Transactions   -     5
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   -     12,913,650
 Gross Notional Value $   -     485,213

 Norwegian Power

 Number of Transactions   5   105
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   73,800   1,856,232
 Gross Notional Value $   1,005,426   27,265,308

 Crude & Products

 Number of Transactions   7   252
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   1,170,000   28,566,184
 Gross Notional Value $   15,975,000   391,322,620

 Petchems

 Number of Transactions   1   39
 Volume of Transactions    10,000   338,000
 Gross Notional Value $   124,000   46,828,900

 LPG

 Number of Transactions   8   178
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   160,000   2,088,000
 Gross Notional Value $   5,131,000   70,884,500

 U.S. Coal

 Number of Transactions   -     85
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     2,033,424
 Gross Notional Value $   -     29,767,433

 U.S. Pulp & Paper

 Number of Transactions   -     4
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     2,550
 Gross Notional Value $   -     1,500,750

 Plastics

 Number of Transactions   -     2
 Volume of Transactions   -     3,000,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     870,000

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   2   63
 Volume of Transactions   5,000   157,500
 Gross Notional Value $   660,000   20,620,150

 U.S. Weather

 Number of Transactions   -     88
 Volume of Transactions    -     93
 Gross Notional Value $   -     55,974

 UK Weather

 Number of Transactions   -     17
 Volume of Transactions    -     17
 Gross Notional Value $   -     4,903

 Number of Users Logging onto EnronOnline:
 External Users with Execution rights    815
 External Users with No Execution Rights    58

 Internal Trading
 2-Mar-00  To Date
 Gas

 Number of Transactions   173   2,884
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   67,462,526   1,167,039,578
 Gross Notional Value $   165,157,633   2,143,255,443

 Power

 Number of Transactions   -     73
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   -     1,001,928
 Gross Notional Value $   -     30,082,728

 Coal

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Total

 Number of Transactions   173   2,957
 Gross Notional Value $   165,157,633   2,173,338,172

Regards

Louise


Daren,

Please take a look at the attached spreadsheet, we have over 500,000mmbtu as
unaccounted for... O'Neal 3-9686


Hi.  Hope the ride back to Sacramento went OK last nite.  It was nice to see
you and catch up. I'm sorry things are so crazy, but in spite of it all, your
attitude's pretty good.  And your new suede jacket is gorgeous.

I know your life is very complicated and I don't want to make it worse, but
if you ever have the time and inclination to go to lunch, dinner, movie,
whatever, I'd definitely be up for it.  Hang in there.  Hope to catch up
again soon.

Best,
Jeff


Bill -

Come by and talk to me about an opportunity starting in october 1st.  Basically, Grays Harbor, Benton and Franklin would like to outsource some real time transactions to us for a short period of time until they get comfortable with SLICE.  They will probably come in for a meeting on September 20th or 21st in the morning to discuss this.  I would like you to be there for the meeting.

Stewart


-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [mailto:JHay@sempra.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:31 PM
To: 'JBennett'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

Second email --

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [ mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com <mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:14 PM
To: 'Hay, James E.'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony First Email

They have not come through yet.  I will let you know.  Thank you.  Jeanne
Bennett

-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [ mailto:JHay@sempra.com <mailto:JHay@sempra.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:00 PM
To: 'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

Ms. Bennett, please let me know if you were able to open the files in the
email that I just sent to you.

        This filing is Exhibit 38.  If you are unable to open the files,
please email me and I will send them to you one at a time.  .... Jim Hay

        Jim Hay
Regulatory Project Manager
Sempra Energy
101 Ash Street HQ14B
San Diego, CA 92101-3017
Email - jhay@sempra.com

         Phone - 619-696-2141 Fax - 619-696-4027

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:57 PM
To:     'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony  First  Email

         << Message: FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August
15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Second E-Mail:
Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in
A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Third E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to

ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Van Wagenen, Lynn G.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:33 PM
To:
Cc:     Melville, Keith W.; Hay, James E.
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        Jeanne,  I understand from Keith Melville that you were looking for
various pieces of SDG&E's May 18, 2001 filing in our Revenue Shortfall
Surcharge Application (A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044).  I have included in the
attached note the entire SDG&E filing.  Hopefully, you will be able to find
in the package the information/data you are seeking.  Recognize that there
were some corrections made on the stand by some of the witnesses.  I would
recommend that you check the transcript for those corrections.

        Also, Keith tells me you also wanted a copy of Exhibit #38.  Jim Hay

will send it to you in a separate e-mail.

        Please let us know, if you need further documents in this
proceeding.  Have a great day!

         Lynn G, Van Wagenen
Lynn G. Van Wagenen
Sempra Energy - San Diego
Regulatory Case Management
(619) 696-4055   FAX - Ext. 4027
E-Mail:  LVanWagenen@sempra.com

        -----Original Message-----
From:   Evans, Darleen
Sent:   Friday, May 18, 2001 4:35 PM
To:     bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill, Thomas;
bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com; cjw5@pge.com;
cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; cxw@cpuc.ca.gov;
DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov;
douglass@arterhadden.com; dpritchard@mofo.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; rmccann@cal.net; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;

sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

        Cc:     Croyle, David; Derbas, Mohamed; Evans, Darleen; Fong, Ed;
Hansen, Douglas; Resley, Robert; Rossi, Rosalinda; Saxe, William; Schavrien,

Lee; Schneider, Michael; Swanson, Rich

        Subject:        A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        TESTIMONY:

         << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Croyle Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle Updated PDT(v1).DOC
>>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Derbas PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  <<

File: A.01-01-044 Fong Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong
Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong PD(v1).DOC >>

        _____________________________
ATTACHMENTS/TABLES:

         << File: Bill Impacts (large).xls >>  << File: Bill Impacts
(small).xls >>  << File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large) DecisionTemp1.XLS >>
<< File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large)FINAL Update2.XLS >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)DecisionTemp1.xls >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)FINAL1.xls >>

        __________________________________

        Darleen Evans

        Sempra Energy - Law Department

        619-699-5056

        devans@sempra.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <JHay@sempra.com>
To: Van Wagenen, Lynn G. <LVanWagenen@sempra.com>
Date: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:42:07 GMT
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:24 AM
To:     Reed, Debra L.; Parrott, Jeff; Trace, Jeffrey; Melville, Keith W.;
Deremer, Kenneth; Schavrien, Lee; Savage, Marie; Schneider, Michael M.;
Strong, Michael G.; Derbas, Mohamed; Szymanski, Paul; Swanson, Rich; Resley,
Robert J.; Jack, Stephen J.; Rahon, Steve; Garcia, Sue E.; Weinmeister, Sue;
Roberts, Ted; Farrelly, Terry C.; Brill, Thomas R.; Saxe, William; Kline,
Doug; Farmer, Laura; Larson, Art; Fair, Pam; Avery, James; Overturf, Billie
J.; John, Fred E.; Reed, William

Subject:        FW: Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling
of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:01 AM
To:     Schavrien, Lee; Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Melville, Keith W.
Subject:        FW: Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling
of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

Second of three emails.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ruiz, Annie
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 8:36 AM
To:     ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill,
Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com;
cjw5@pge.com; cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil;
dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; douglass@energyattorney.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; mzr@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
rax@cpuc.ca.gov; riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;
sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

Cc:     Hay, James E.
Subject:        Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of
August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

The following are SDG&E's Exhibit 14 updates.

<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 1).xls>>          <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 2).xls>>
<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 3).xls>>              <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 4).xls>>
<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 5).xls>>               <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario
6).xls>>

Annie Ruiz

Assistant to Jeffrey M. Parrott

Sempra Energy Law Department  HQ-13

Tel: 619-696-4903  Fax: 619-699-5027

E-mail: aruiz@sempra.com