Fyi -More articles on the Senate Pipeline Safety  Hearing held in Bellingham
Washington
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron on 03/14/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

"Terry D. Boss" <tboss@INGAA.org> on 03/14/2000 10:01:29 AM
To: "Dave Johnson (E-mail)" <David.L.Johnson@enron.com>, "Mike Terraso
(E-mail)" <mterras@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Articles on Yesterday's hearings from Seattle Papers

State wins OK to inspect pipelines

by Brier Dudley
Seattle Times  staff reporter

[IMAGE]

BELLINGHAM - Federal regulators yesterday agreed to allow Washington state
to  inspect all interstate pipelines within its borders, as requested by Gov.
Gary  Locke and the state Legislature.

"We've got it - we've just got to work out the fine details," Locke said.

State officials think they'll do a better job inspecting the 2,500 miles of
pipelines in the state than the federal Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), an
agency that's been harshly criticized since Olympic Pipe Line's June 10
explosion in Bellingham that killed three people.

Other states have tried unsuccessfully to take control of pipeline
inspections from the OPS, which has only 13 inspectors for the West Coast,
but  only four states now have that authority.

Still unresolved, however, is whether the state will be allowed to impose
safety standards stricter than federal standards.

The state's authority could also be short-lived if the OPS and the oil
industry persuade Congress later this year to reduce states' role in
pipeline  oversight.

Mixed messages about the safety office's position were delivered yesterday
at  a special Senate field hearing on pipeline-safety concerns.

Locke announced that the state was given testing authority, based on a faxed
letter he received just hours earlier from the top administrator for
pipeline  safety.

The fax said the state could take over inspections on condition that only
one  state agency were responsible. A state law approved last week would have
divided  the task between two.

But later in the hearing, OPS' deputy administrator, Richard Felder,
acknowledged under questioning that he would prefer that inspection
authority  remain with his office.

To sidestep that debate, U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash., proposed amending
the federal law that gives the OPS authority over pipelines that cross state
lines.

Because Olympic Pipe Line is almost entirely in Washington - its 400-mile
system parallels Interstate 5 and ends in Portland - Gorton suggested that
states be allowed to regulate pipelines that are over 90 percent within
their  borders.

Olympic, a Renton-based subsidiary of Shell, Texaco, Arco and oil shipper
GATX, testified that it would prefer federal oversight.

"Having a unified set of regulations is important for a smooth operation,"
said manager Carl Gast.

Gorton and U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., hosts of the hearing, both want
the state to have more authority over interstate pipelines.

They're backing legislation that would give states authority and funding to
inspect pipelines themselves and require better collection and sharing of
data  about pipelines' condition.

They also want the stricter standards on pipeline testing, monitoring and
operations.

Murray, whose twin sister teaches at a Bellingham school near the explosion
site, noted that pipelines have spilled 5,700 times and killed 325 people in
the  U.S. since 1986. She also said they leak 6 million gallons of hazardous
material  a year, or the equivalent of the Exxon Valdez spill every two
years.

During the hearing at Bellingham City Hall, the senators also heard
emotional  pleas for stricter regulations from victims' parents. Two
10-year-old boys and  an 18-year-old fisherman died after Olympic spilled
277,000 gallons of gasoline  into a city park.

"There needs to be a zero-spill policy, not `we only kill two or three kids
a  year,' " said Frank King, whose 10-year-old, Wade, died in the explosion.

Katherine Dalen, mother of 10-year-old victim Stephen Tsorvias, said the
accident made people realize their neighborhoods may not be safe because of
the  poorly regulated underground pipelines. Also testifying were city
officials from  Renton, SeaTac and Bellevue. Like Bellingham, those cities
are trying to get  Olympic to provide more information and testing to assure
residents that the  pipeline is safe.

Olympic's Gast noted that the company will use two devices to internally
inspect its entire pipeline later this year.

The cause of the accident is still being investigated by the National
Transportation Safety Board, which has been hampered by Olympic employees'
refusal to testify and by a federal criminal investigation into the
accident.

Copyright , 2000 The  Seattle Times Company

Pipeline blast still evokes anger

Grieving parents urge senators to pass  tough safety bill

Tuesday, March 14, 2000

By SCOTT SUNDE Mail Author
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

BELLINGHAM -- Nine months have passed since Bruce Brabec's stepson died in a
horrific pipeline accident here. But the memories haven't faded.

Photo	?
Mary King weeps as her husband,  Frank, testifies yesterday at a Senate field
hearing in Bellingham on  pipeline safety. Their son, Wade, died in the June
pipeline explosion.
Dan DeLong/P-I 	?
The smell of gasoline when Brabec  fills the family car reminds him of the
fumes that killed Liam Wood, who was 18  and out for a day of flyfishing on
June 10.

The sound of the newspaper hitting the front porch every morning reminds
Brabec of when police arrived to tell him and his wife that Liam had been
overcome by fumes from leaking gasoline and drowned.

"Imagine going home tonight, and your child isn't home -- and never will
be,"  Brabec told U.S. Sens. Slade Gorton and Patty Murray during a Senate
field  hearing on pipeline safety yesterday.

?
	Getting involved

	The public may mail written comments on improving pipeline safety to  the
Senate Commerce Committee, 508 Dirksen Senate Office Building,  Washington,
D.C. 20510.

Anger and anguish mixed freely at the hearing, which Gorton, a Republican,
hopes will bolster efforts to win approval for a tough pipeline safety bill
introduced by Democrat Murray.

The hearing in Bellingham's Depression-era City Hall attracted an overflow
crowd. Townsfolk were forced to huddle around television sets and watch the
proceedings in the lobby. Their frequent applause at the angry words drifted
up  the stairs and into the crowded hearing room.

State and local officials blasted the federal Office of Pipeline Safety as
ineffective. It regulates interstate pipelines such as the one owned by
Olympic  Pipe Line Co. that ruptured and caught fire in Bellingham last
June.

There was anger, too, at Olympic. Officials from cities through which the
pipeline runs said the company had resisted supplying them with data from
pipe  inspections, then agreed by providing "X's and O's" that no one could
understand.

"We have no confidence," said Connie Marshall, Bellevue's deputy mayor,
"that  the Olympic pipeline is safely maintained and operated within our
city."

The company, however, pledged a safer pipeline, pointing to a plan
instituted  in October to add valves, test pressure, strengthen computer
processing and make  sophisticated internal inspections. The company is
trying to improve any system  that may have been at fault in the June 10
accident, said Carl Gast, Olympic  vice president and manager.

"We are not waiting until after the investigation (by the National
Transportation Safety Board) is complete to take action," Gast said.

Gast, who has worked in the pipeline industry for 31 years, called the
company's safety plan "the most far-reaching with which I've ever been
involved."

Olympic runs a 400-mile system that takes petroleum products from refineries
north of Bellingham and at Anacortes to Portland. The system runs near the
Interstate 5 corridor, including through the suburbs east of Lake
Washington.

The victims:

Wade King:  The 10-year-old burned to death while playing in Whatcom Creek
when it  erupted in a fireball June 10.

Stephen Tsorvias: Also, 10, he was playing with Wade when  gasoline ignited
after spilling from a ruptured Olympic Pipe Line fuel  line.

Liam Wood: The 18-year-old was flyfishing on the creek when he  was overcome
by leaking gasoline fumes and drowned.

The anguish at the hearing came from the parents of Wood and parents of two
10-year-old boys -- Wade King and Stephen Tsorvias -- who burned to death as
277,000 gallons of spilled gasoline ignited and a fireball roared down
Whatcom  Creek.

At times, "sadness tears our hearts apart and drowns our spirits," said
Katherine Dalen, Stephen's mother.

Marlene Robinson, Liam's mother, said softly: "I no longer have children to
protect."

They, too, were angry at Olympic and at the Office of Pipeline Safety.

The boys' families have filed wrongful-death lawsuits against Olympic. Frank
King, Wade's father, made it clear yesterday whom he blames for the tragedy.

"The company is an outrage. It needs to be shut down," King said. "Olympic's
gross, wanton recklessness killed my little man."

King said he has evidence that Olympic had a chance in July 1997 to dig up
the pipe where it would later rupture to check for possible problems, but
decided not to because the excavation would be too difficult. Bellingham has
a  water plant near the site of the rupture and numerous water pipes are
above the  pipeline.

In an interview, King produced an Olympic document gathered for his lawsuit
that he said indicated that the company decided not to dig up the pipe. In
1996  and 1997, Olympic did an internal inspection of its pipeline.

Possible defects were identified in the inspections near where the pipe
would  later rupture. But Olympic has said the possible defects did not seem
serious  enough to dig up the pipeline near the water plant.

Olympic Pipe Line spokeswoman Maggie Brown said King's testimony marked the
first time she had ever heard the claim that the company was prepared to dig
up  that section of pipe in 1997 but decided not to.

King's wife, Mary, erupted in frustration that the accident was allowed to
happen.

"If this is properly maintained, regulated, whatever, it won't happen
again,"  she said tearfully. "Anything is going to be better than what went
on in the  past, which was nothing."

In fact, pipeline regulation may be changing.

The Washington Legislature passed a bill this year that sets up a state
pipeline safety program and asks the federal government for the power to
police  interstate lines like Olympic's.

Gov. Gary Locke told Gorton and Murray yesterday that the federal government
may be willing to give the state the authority to inspect interstate
pipelines.  Four states currently have that authority, but the federal
government still  retains the right to punish pipeline companies over
problems found in  inspections.

A top official of the U.S. Transportation Department told Locke in a letter
yesterday that the federal government may give Washington inspection
authority.

Locke, however, also wants the state to have the authority to regulate
pipelines and to use tougher standards than the federal rules to do so.

Murray's bill would give the states more authority.

Richard Felder, head of the Office of Pipeline Safety, admitted that his
regulators have had problems. "We worked to restore public confidence,"
Felder  said, "but clearly we have a long way to go."

Felder said the office's proposed budget would provide it with more money
for  regulation. He also said his office will propose a new regulation by the
end of  the month to require companies to test the safety of their
pipelines.

Gorton and Murray, however, seemed unconvinced that federal regulators will
get tough. So was Bob Chipkovitch, who runs the pipeline program at the
National  Transportation Safety Board. The NTSB, which has no regulatory
authority, has  repeatedly recommended tougher rules, only to see nothing
happen in the Office  of Pipeline Safety, he said.

For example, 12 years after the NTSB recommended that regulators require
periodic inspections, no such rule has been adopted.

"I hope Bellingham has made a difference," Chipkovitch said. "No, we haven't
seen a change yet (by regulators). But I hope this accident does provide the
impetus to do that."

The NTSB has yet to determine the cause of the June 10 accident. But
Chipkovitch said the investigation so far has shown "significant performance
failures" by pipeline controllers.

He noted that the pipeline rupture began at 3:30 p.m. June 10 after a pump
failure near Woodinville, computer problems at the company's Renton
headquarters  and a valve closed near Anacortes. But 45 minutes later,
refineries north of  Bellingham resumed putting gasoline in the line.

Controllers only started shutting down the pipeline for good at 4:30.

At the point where the pipeline ruptured, there may be evidence of external
damage, Chipkovitch said. Olympic contends that construction at the water
plant  in 1994 damaged the pipe.

But investigators have yet to fully test the damaged pipe. A federal
criminal  investigation into the accident has kept them from doing so. At the
same time,  several Olympic officials have refused to talk to the NTSB,
fearing they would  incriminate themselves.

Chipkovitch said the investigation also focuses on the valve near Anacortes
that closed June 10, increasing pressure in the pipe upstream. The valve
closed  50 times in the six months before the Bellingham accident, he said.

Pipeline accidents

Some of the country's largest pipeline accidents in recent years:

June 10, 1999: The Olympic Pipe Line Co.'s pipeline in Bellingham  ruptured
and 277,000 gallons of jet fuel spilled into Whatcom Creek, then  ignited
(above), killing two 10-year-old boys and an 18-year-old  fisherman. It was
the 43rd reported spill on the line since it was opened  in 1965.

November 1996: Propane from a leaking gas-service pipe exploded in  downtown
San Juan, Puerto Rico, killing 33 people and injuring 69 others.

August 1996: A pipeline carrying liquid butane ruptured in Lively,  Texas,
sending a butane vapor cloud into a residential area. Two residents  tried to
escape, but their vehicle's ignition started a fire that killed  them.

June 1996: A fuel oil line ruptured near Fork Shoals, S.C., spilling  958,000
gallons into the Reedy River.

May 1996: A gasoline pipeline near Gramercy, La., ruptured and spilled
475,000 gallons of fuel into wetlands and a river.

February 1994: A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Edison, N.J.,  destroying
three apartment buildings and leaving 1,500 people homeless.

August 1989: Soil tests result in the discovery of a decades-long spill  in
an Avila Beach, Calif., pipeline which Union Oil Co. had used for  almost 90
years. The entire commercial center of the town was razed in the  cleanup
effort, which is continuing (left). Another pipeline nearby was  found to
have leaked more than 9 million gallons of crude oil over a  50-year period.
Unocal has agreed to pay more than $48 million in cleanup  costs.

May 1989: A gasoline pipeline ruptured in San Bernardino, Calif.,  killing
two people and destroying 11 homes.

December 1980: A corroded line carrying naphtha ruptured in Long Beach,
Calif. The flammable substance sprayed 20 feet into the air, then ignited,
injuring 5 and destroying or damaging 12 homes.

?

P-I reporter Scott Sunde can be reached at 206-448-8331 or
scottsunde@seattle-pi.com

Confidential: INGAA Member Use  only

Terry D. Boss
VP Environment Safety and Operations
INGAA
tboss@ingaa.org
?


Vince:

I have just finished talking with Rick.  He will have the HR person to
workout the details and get me on board this week.   Thank you so much for
your help.  I would like to let you know that your help meant a great deal
for me,  I am not taking it lightly.   I will do my best to get the work down
and live up to yours and Rick's expectations.

Thank you again.

Ding.
6-7072


Rod, Shelley mentioned that you indicated there were written procedures that we needed to check to see if being followed in regards to Measurement.  A lot of new procedures came out of the Continuous Improvement effort and I have a copy of some.  Is this what you are referring to?  Do you happen to have a complete copy of the final report from all the areas?  cvb


Stan -

Lisa Mellencamp, one of Mark Haedicke's lawyers, has just invited me to a meeting on Friday at noon to discuss "contingency planning."  I'll keep you posted.

Try to have a good Thanksgiving.

Rob


Paul,

We see what you refer to as " the Cavanaugh/Edison bill" as a re-play of AB
1421 from last year.  That bill will destroy the retail market.  We opposed
1421 and we'll oppose any son of 1421. We do not want to see it tied to any
aggregation bill, the public goods charge extension or anything else.

Sue Mara

Paul Fenn <paulfenn@local.org> on 02/24/2000 07:03:12 PM
To: Don Dame <DDame@ncpa.com>
cc: Gary Ackerman <foothi19@idt.net>, Beth Bloom <bbloom@apx.com>, Bill Ross
<billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>, Corby Gardin
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, David Bobo <david-bobo@hlp.com>, Greg
Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Ken Czarnecki <Ken_J_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, Kent
Wheatland <KEWH@dynegy.com>, Leah Bissonette <lbissone@energy.twc.com>, Randy
Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
Rob Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger
Pelote <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, Sue Mara <smara@enron.com>, Tom Delaney
<tom_delaney@enron.com>, Vicki Sandler <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>, Dan
Douglass <douglass@earthlink.net>, Don Dame <DDame@ncpa.com>, Old Deuteronomy
<mflorio@turn.org>, Sean Casey <sfc@cpuc.ca.gov>, Jim Price
<jep@cpuc.ca.gov>, Paul Fenn <paulfenn@local.org>
Subject: RE: WPTF, Community Choice

Don,

While the points you make are good ones, I think we should go for it this
year.

First, the Cavanaugh/Edison bill will in part restructure Chapter 854
regarding the role of the default provider, and Edison will be asking for a
solidification of its distribution role, so this it is the natural vehicle
to redress aggregation. If we wait until next year it may be too late,
because we will be pushing rather than pulling. I think Edison and PG&E may
put up less of a fight in this context.

Second, while the League of Cities has not been involved, twelve cities and
counties representing 2 million Californians passed a resolution last year
asking the legislature for Community Choice. The leaders, from the Southern
California Cities Joint Powers Consortium, San Francisco, Oakland, and
Marin County, are actively involved in geting support from Bowen and
Burton. Oakland is planning a statewide conference of cities and national
leaders on Community Choice this Summer, which would coincide with
committee hearings and attract media attention. In both Massachusetts and
Ohio, we had weak support from the Leagues and did the job with about 35
municipalities represented. I am confident we will have that number in
California this year.

Third, TURN is providing strong support for the bill. I believe CALPIRG,
UCAN and other consumer groups will give strong support as a result of the
national coalition for Community Choice legislation, RAGE, which has signed
most of them on the agenda over the past two years.

Finally, the PUC is looking into Distribution Competition this year, and
both the ORA and Strategic Planning are actively interested in Community
Choice as a strategy for making the market work.

As you described it, the legislation allows municipalities to implement
Community Choice programs, and does not require it.

Regards,

Paul Fenn

At 02:17 PM 02/24/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>I truly believe that giving local public entities the right, but not the
>obligation, to provide default commodity service will advance competition
>and provide one more check against host IOU economic hegemony.
>
>To get legislation passed, however, will require at least three components:
>
>1) An informed, supportive bill sponsor (Debra Bowen would be ideal,
>and lots of other legislative support).
>
>2) A bit of national focus and support (say APPA and others)
>
>3) And, vocal support from the League of Cities and other local
>government organizations.
>
>I do not believe we are yet close to at least two of the above three.  I may
>make sense to generate more widespread support and debate before submitting
>a bill which will not pass.  PG&E and SCE will mount a very effective attack
>on any bill giving default rights to local governments.  If we try
>prematurely and fail, subsequent attempts may be doomed to failure as well.
>
>I believe that we should work the turf and see if we can generate some local
>govt. enthusiasm for such a bill, without which it will not likely pass.
>Although I hate to delay, the chances of success may increase if we wait
>6-12 months and use the interim period to gain additional support.
>
>Any rebuttal??
>
Paul Fenn
paulfenn@local.org
Tel/Fax 510 451 1727
American Local Power Project
1615 Broadway 1005
Oakland, CA 94612
United States
local.org


just a little propaganda.  some of this might be old, but it's still fun to
read.

---------------------- Forwarded by Craig J. Dean/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US on
08/24/2000 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From: Randy A. Hyzak on 08/17/2000 11:22 AM
AABS / Audit
Phone Number: (214) 969-8653
Cell Phone: (214) 289-5840       EYComm: 3274992

To: Craig J. Dean/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica, Ryan
Shultz/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica
cc:
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

Thought you boys may enjoy!
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy A. Hyzak/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US
on 08/17/2000 11:22 AM ---------------------------

dhyzak@quantaservices.com on 08/17/2000 10:38:51 AM

To: Randy A. Hyzak/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica,
ghyzak@ashford.com@Internet
cc:
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

-----Original Message-----
From:  Martin, Shannon
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:31 AM
To: Andy Michel (E-mail); Barry Goss (E-mail); Chris Cole (E-mail);
Dwayne Hyzak; Fritz Boehm (E-mail); Jason Kroll (E-mail); Jeff Deatsman
(E-mail); Jess Morris (E-mail); Kendall Bowlin (E-mail); Kristi Fenton
(E-mail); Mik Hogan (E-mail); Ray Cole (E-mail)
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

 <<att1.unk>>  <<ATT05881.txt>>

Shannon Martin
wk. (713) 985-6424
c.    (713) 857-0392
Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE: PWR)
1360 Post Oak Blvd., St. 2100
Houston, Tx. 77027

-----Original Message-----
From: Pradeep.Rao@chase.com [mailto:Pradeep.Rao@chase.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:38 AM
To: sachin.menon@us.cgeyc.com; anil.advani@ey.com;
westley.s.stockton@us.arthurandersen.com;
joel.w.hermes@us.arthurandersen.com; jdurham@minutemaid.com;
cerones@yahoo.com; smartin@quantaservices.com; dhyzak@quantaservices.com;
Don.Bleasdell@smedica.com; pobrien@quantaservices.com
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

Don't tell me this doesn't get you excited.....true or not........more
likely
than not........dammit, i hate waiting.....at least I get to see him
FRIDAY!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Pradeep Rao/CHASE on 08/16/2000 10:36 AM
---------------------------

c.sean.muller@us.arthurandersen.com on 08/16/2000 11:28:13 AM

 To: robert.a.hawkins@us.arthurandersen.com,
 jonathan.c.grahmann@us.arthurandersen.com, Pradeep
 Rao/CHASE@CHASE, b_mortee@hotmail.com,
 david.n.sanders@us.arthurandersen.com

 cc:

 Subject: FW: williams and BJ

from a friend in Austin....
The uncut version.

i went to both the am and the pm practices yesterday, and let me
re-re-re-iterate that we have a great group of receivers and that the stud
dog bad ass mofo of the group is roy williams.  he is physically way beyond
not only vasher and the walkon CBs trying to cover him, but the rest of the
college ranks.  ahmad brooks was standing by him in street clothes, and
there ain't a chance he could stop roy.  roy flies past people and gets way
the fuck up there and takes the ball out of the clouds.  he's a fucking
randy moss, but you know what?  he's bigger than randy moss and as fast as
randy moss and probably has as good a vertical as randy moss:

Moss
height: 6'4"
weight:  198 lbs.
40 speed: 4.3
vertical: ?

Roy
height: 6'5"
weight: 210 lbs.
40 speed: 4.3
100 speed: 10.38
high jump: 6'10"
long jump: 24'

we may just have the next superhuman WR on our team.  pray for no injuries.
i'm going to the pm practice today, too.  got a hard-on just thinking about
roy.  probably will see a few NFL GMs there.

and the other WRs are spectacular, too.  sloan is 6'2" and does well at
establishing and holding position vs. the cover man.  BJ is 6'1" and has
really soft hands.  i watched BJ, vasher and jeffrey field 12-15 punts each
at 60 yds with a cross wind in the pm session.  vasher and jeffrey had
technical problems and bobbled or dropped almost half.  BJ never bobbled or
dropped one.  as soon as it's close, he just sucks it in and takes off.  and
that's how he catches balls on the crossing routes.  vacuum hands.

it's going to be unfuckingreal a year or two down the road when these guys
have experience and simms gets to throw to them on the field three at a
time.  you can't doubleteam them all.

put simply, i think the days of our using white 5'7" WRs are over.

******************************************************************************
*
Note:          The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible
for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP
******************************************************************************
*
 - att1.unk
 - ATT05881.txt


Susan will be in around 9:30 - 10:00 today.


Harry,

A little birdie told me today was your birthday!!  Unfortunately the little
birdie gave me the wrong email address the first time or you would have had
this email earlier.  Anyway, I wanted to wish you a very Happy Birthday.
Hope you have a great day and we'll see you guys this weekend.

Robin


Jim

Of course I agree.

Not playing any hockey and it's killing me.

Hopefully I'll see you next time.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jim.Agah@saccapital.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jim+2EAgah+40saccapital+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	lavorato@enron.com
Subject:	SAC visit...

John,
Sorry I missed you on your recent visit to SAC.  I hope the visit was rewarding and offers good potential.  Gavin has told me about your meteoric rise to the upper echelon of one of the US's fastest growing and profitable companies...good stuff.  Congrats on your successes, and stay in touch with us, because this place is growing at warpspeed as well.
Funny, I was thinking about how much trouble and discouragement we both had in getting sales and trading jobs out of Kellogg.  Guess Goldman, et. al., weren't too bright after all.
Are you still playing hockey?
Jim


Here is the text of their spot. Attn: PSI, dub will  arrive tomorrow.


he is correct it should be july 02, but he has july 01

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/20/2001 04:15 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: natsource check out

mike says 555403 is Q3-02 - it's been changed
but  he thinks 555404 should be Jul-02, not Q3-02 - is Natsource broker sure?

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource check out

555403
broker has Q302

555404
broker has Q302

thanks


Tana:

Amoco Oil Company is not authorized to trade US power -- not a current
trading partner and not FERC approved.
Mariner Energy, Inc. is not authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit.

Commonwealth Edison Company IS AUTHORIZED to trade US power.

Leslie


Start Date: 10/12/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101216.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_RED
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ORANGE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_YELLOW
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BLUE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GREEN
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GOLD
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


that is my reputation


that was a good comeback

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maybe I like trouble

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:

you better be careful about drinks I think you might be in trouble


Shelley,

I am ready to meet at your convenience.  I will have Ricki set up some time on your calendar.  Thanks.

Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:00 PM
To:	Dietz, Rick
Subject:	Performance Review

Rick,

Here is the draft written review that I prepared on my travels.  Please let me know when you would like to sit down and have a face-to-face discussion.

 << File: dietz, rick.doc >>


Hello,

Thank you in advance for taking the time to review Zach's resume for
potential opportunities at Enron.? I appreciate your offer to identify if
there are areas within Enron that could utilize his technical, business and
project implementation skills.

Zach has worked the past 4 years as a technical consultant in our Customer
Relationship Management practice of Deloitte Consulting.? His experience
demonstrates a broad range of technical and business expertise working for
clients such as the State of California, Puget Sound Energy and Kaiser
Permanente.? Zach also played an integral role in the international
e-commerce project based in Switzerland.

Zach is interested in finding a position which will enable him to leverage
his technical skills in a business role for a company.? His contact
information is listed on his resume if you feel as though his skills would
meet the needs of a division within Enron.

Thank you again for your time,

Andrea Crump
# 404-631-2062 - work
# 713-859-7850 - cell
# 916-772-1624 - home

Attachment: Zach Streight.pdf (resume)

 <<Zach Streight.pdf>>

 - Zach Streight.pdf


I think it can be accomplished so long as we have no obligation to agree to
any particular terms in the definitive docs.  I don't see why we would need
to DASH exclusivity.

See you soon,

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/16/2001 11:30 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro

Subject: Re: PSEG - Exclusivity Letter & Comments

Isn't that accomplished by having the agreement be simply an exclusivity
agreement wherein the consideration for the duration of exclusivity is the
$300k? Fred's checking with credit to see if we need to DASH exclusivity
(although I find it hard to believe that we would).

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/16/2001 08:41 AM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: PSEG - Exclusivity Letter & Comments

Gentlemen,

I think we also need to be certain that we have a decent amount of discretion
in whether we close, otherwise we have to consider the DASH process at this
time.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/16/2001 01:12 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PSEG - Exclusivity Letter & Comments

From a commercial perspective, I don't have a problem leaving out the
exercise price during the 30 day option period, so long as our obligation to
sell is contingent upon the negotiation of a purchase agreement and the
agreement on purchase price. $300k seems fair for a 30 day exclusivity.

Regards,

Ben


Dave,
Could you possibly help me set a shortcut to test this report today. I
believe what Kroum is asking is for me to run the STAGE report against
PRODUCTION data. Does that sound correct? I thought you'd know more. Just
holler over here whenever you get a chance.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/19/2001 09:30 AM
---------------------------
From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 11:32 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Forward Ob test run

    Thanks Kate,

    We were looking for somebody like you. You can run it with any settings,
   as you run it every day.  Make sure you see version 3.0.0.30.

    I think however it is better if you can run  the report against
production data
    because the test data are not good enough. I think David Poston created
    a shortcut on Cara's and Valarie's computers, you can talk to him to do it
    for you as well.

     The command from the command prompt should be:
      C:\Enpower\stage > FwdObl user_id user_password  pwrprodn_ded
    (ask the IT people if this doesn't mean anything to you, I can phone
       David as well you want me to)

     Thanks,
     Kroum
     713-853-9980

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:11 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Semperger, Cara
Subject: Forward Ob test run

I'd be more than happy to run a test of the new forward obligation report in
order for you to move it to production. I do use the application everyday
when determining the West desk positions in relation to each other, so it's a
report I'm familiar with and also one that may affect me if it's changed.
Please let me know if you'd like me to run the report and under what terms.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


All,

My apologies.   Here is the current version of the captioned Schedule (dated
as of 10/18/99).


You are receiving this email because you are
subscribed to one or more email newsletters
from Crosswalk.com.  Once in a while, we have
information we need to share with all of our
subscribers.  We promise we won't bombard your
inbox!
_____________________________________________

Dear Crosswalk.com subscriber,

We'd like to send you great deals on the latest books and Christian
music, alert you to intriguing Web sites, and let you know of ways you
can pray for and assist in crisis situations around the world. Don't
miss out!  Click here to be included in our Crosswalk Presents
newsletter:

http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/T.ASP?A3.57.3579.1.261895.?drct~261895~V9udWFWFS8ES

We'll email you occasionally with special offers from our sponsors.
We'll NEVER sell or rent your email address to anyone else.

AND -- By signing up today, you'll receive a $5 coupon toward a purchase
at Family Christian Stores Web site (http://www.familychristian.com).*

Go ahead -- get a jump on your Christmas shopping at Family Christian
Stores Web site, and sign up for more great deals delivered to your in
box. Click here!

http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/T.ASP?A3.57.3579.1.261895.?drct~261895~V9udWFWFS8ES

* Expires 1/15/02. No cash value. One coupon per customer, not valid
with any other offers. We'll email you the coupon code after you sign
up.

____________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from this list immediately, click here:
http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.57.261895
or send an email to U-A3.57.261895@lists.crosswalk.com.
You will be taken off the list immediately! Please note:
we use this list sparingly and for information that
we consider very important for all of our email
newsletter subscribers.  By unsubscribing, you may miss
important information regarding your newsletter subscriptions.
If you have questions, send them to us at
newsletter-feedback@crosswalk.com.


This is a copy of your message sent to ACVance@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I was surfing through the pictures on this web site and ran across yours.  I found you to be extremely attractive and your interests to be similar to mine.  That is except for your religious match, are you really looking for a Buddhist?  Anyway take a look at my profile and drop me a line if there is any interest.  I hope to hear from you soon!

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=0

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


I'm glad you had a great time.  It meant a lot to Lisa and me that you were
able to spend
the entire weekend with us.  I honestly can't remember the last time I had so
much fun.  I
hope you felt the same way.  Talk to you soon.

Kevin


Thanks.  Tribolet sent it along.  Here it is.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 02:53 PM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/10/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:Trustee letter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject:

Hi:  Could you send me a copy of the Trustee letter?  Email would be great;
otherwise, fax is 415.782.7854.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Daren - Pat gave me a a spreadsheet showing what should be allocated to
Greens Bayou.  I checked the deal ticket (286824) and it ends on 6/17.  There
is still two more days that need to be reallocated.  Please let me know if
you can extend this deal or create a new one.

Thanks.

AL


Start Date: 2/23/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022309.txt


Kay:

Here's another copy...

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:49 AM
To: "Douglas Turner" <dcturner@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON; Mitro, Fred
Cc: Michael Carlson; Becky Alex; Mitro, Fred; Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Draft LOI

Attached are clean and marked versions of our comments to the LOI. We should
have the referenced Tolling Agreement term sheet to you by Wednesday.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience when you will be prepared to
discuss our comments. Thanks much.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: "Douglas Turner" <dcturner@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Thu 5/24/2001 2:40 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred
Cc: Michael Carlson; Becky Alex
Subject: Draft LOI

Gentlemen,

At the request of Becky Alex, attached for your review is a draft of a Letter
of Intent relating to the Midway project located in Central Florida.   Please
respond with questions or comments to Becky at 813-228-1107.

Cordially,
Doug Turner

 - Enron LOI.v1.522.doc <<Enron LOI.v1.522.doc>>


-----Original Message-----
From: Sharon Brass
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:00 AM
To: Terry Myers; Maureen McCann; Ted Bockius
Subject: FW: Bobby Riggins was in an accident

FYI

Thanks,
Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: ? Cumings, Cindy [mailto:Cindy.Cumings@COMPAQ.com]
Sent:?? Monday, July 17, 2000 9:35 AM
To:???? 'Sharon Brass'; 'Sharon Fothergill'
Subject:??????? Bobby Riggins was in an accident

Please send to Terry, Maureen and others that know Bobby...
Thanks,
Cindy Cumings
eMarketing Manager GVC
Compaq Computer Corporation
(281) 518-7762
cindy.cumings@compaq.com

Visit the GVC Inline site at http://nonstop.inet.cpqcorp.net/easupport
-----Original Message-----
From:?? Houston Racing Triathon Club [mailto:houstonracing@excite.com]
Sent:?? Monday, July 17, 2000 9:16 AM
To:???? houstonracing@excite.com
Subject:

As many of you may know there was a serious bike accident last Saturday.? A
drunk driver came off 290 and hit a group of cyclists just finishing the
Cyfair ride.? Tragically the first rider, Bruce Maughs, was killed.? Three
other riders, Barbara Carlson and HRTC members Bobby Riggins and Tim Hunt
were seriously injured.? Bobby is in Ben Taub hospital, and Tim and Barbara
are in Memorial Hermann Hospital and all have undergone surgery.? Our
thoughts go out to them, and the family of Bruce Maughs.? According to the
Harris County Sheriff's Department, the driver is to be charged with
involuntary manslaughter.

===========================================
Houston Racing Triathlon Club
Hotline: 713-572-0767
Web Page:http://www.houstonracing.com
E-mail: houstonracing@excite.com
Address: P.O. Box 130404
Houston, TX 77219
===========================================

_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html


I am attaching a contact sheet for the attorneys who will be working on this
matter.  Please feel free to call any of us at any time.  I look forward to
meeting you on Monday.

 - Doc1


Monday,  December 11, 2000

To:  All PX Market Participants

From:     John Yurkanin
Chief Operating Officer

Re:  Loss of Continuity in PX Day Ahead Auction Due to ISO Rule Changes

The emergency tariff filing by the California ISO last Friday has had a
negative
effect on the  PX day ahead auction market.  The mixture of soft and hard caps
results in a complete disconnect and unacceptable risk to all of our
participants and will probably not provide the ISO with its sought after
reduction in real time energy sales and procurement.  The overall effect will
be
that supply will still defer to the higher realized price opportunity the ISO
offers.

The PX is petitioning Terry Winter of the ISO to immediately allow for
adjustment bids on any submitted schedule at any price relevant. The hard cap
retention on adjustment bids has resulted in a nullification of meaningful
forward bids in the day ahead auction.  This is not a software failure or
issue
with the ISO; it is a policy issue that may have been overlooked in the ISO

?s
most recent emergency market response.

We all commend the ISO for its efforts in keeping the lights on and share
their
concern of an overworked staff trying to procure energy.  But their recent
policy change will not help California and undermines a meaningful reference
price for spot markets.

In addition to asking the ISO to amend its emergency tariff the PX is also
filing directly today directly with the  FERC an emergency intervention to ask
for action to correct this market damaging outcome.   Your support of our
actions with both the ISO and the FERC would be most appreciated.


Attached please find a clean copy of the most recent version of the City
of Austin Agreement (the second document below), as well as a blackline
showing changes from the last version circulated on December 14.  The
Agreement deletes references to specific performance guarantees for
combined cycle plants. The Agreement now has the exhibits rolled in. To
complete the agreement, we need to include the date of execution, the
addresses and contacts for Sections 25.1 and 25.3, and Exhibit H-2. Let
me know if you would like me to e-mail a copy of this directly to Lee
Johnson and Kent Shoemaker.

 Please call when you have the opportunity to discuss the form
agreement you asked me to create.
 <<CRO- City of Austin/GE Facility Agreement Versions 3 to 4.DOC>>
<<Gas Turbine Agreement Draft of 12/13/00.DOC>>
 - GE Facility Agreement Versions 3 to 4.DOC
 - 00.DOC


Thanx.  Very professionally written.  I only had to look up a couple of words.

LC


Yes, Barry Pearce is on the list.  I'll make the alterations indicated below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Oquinn, Kari
Subject:	FW: Netco list

Is Barry Pearce in the list?

See below for alterations

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	Netco list

Eric Moon resigned
Haedicke	Back in
Elbertson	Back in

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Vince:
I was in the power modeling presentation the other day and wanted to know if
I could get a copy of your presentation.  Thanks agin for taking the time to
go through this important material with us.
Regards,
Ben Rogers
3-7998


Andrew Heinle
Tariff Administrator
Midwest ISO
317-249-5594
aheinle@midwestiso.org

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Joe Gardner
> Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 6:17 PM
> To:	Andrew Heinle
> Subject:	FW: Important Notice Regarding MISO Generator
> Interconnection Agreements
>
>
>
> Joe Gardner
> Midwest ISO
> 701 City Center Drive
> Carmel,  Indiana 46032
>
> Phone: 317-249-5446
> Pager:  317-394-4293
> e-mail:  jgardner@midwestiso.org
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Jeff Webb
> Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 5:33 PM
> To:	Misotransowner (E-mail); Miso_Update (E-mail); PSG Exploder
> (E-mail)
> Cc:	Joe Gardner; *Operations Directors
> Subject:	Important Notice Regarding MISO Generator
> Interconnection Agreements
>
> The Midwest ISO has modified the process of transition from
> Interconnection and Operating Agreements that are in negotiation to
> the Midwest ISO Interconnection and Operating Agreement.  The new
> process is described in the attached and will be posted to the MISO
> web page and OASIS.
>
>  <<Update to Int transitions.doc>>
>
> Jeffrey R. Webb
> Director of Planning
> Midwest ISO
> 317-249-5412
>
 - Update to Int transitions.doc


Attached are the final draft of the talking points on Enron's deal to support
Davis in exchange for competition.

Rick tells me that he intends (with Steve) to talk with Lay about this at the
9:30am tomorrow (on Friday).

Jim


Tana:  Please see Sami's message below.  Is there something you can send?  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

Sami Arap@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/05/2000 09:18 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Sara;

Are you also involved in EnronOnLine ?  I only got a copy of an EOL summary
but would like to receive a more detailed memo about such business.  Can you
provide me with any additional materials ?!

Thanks,

Sami

Sara Shackleton@ECT
05/04/2000 04:29 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Hi, Sami!  Sorry we missed the call yesterday.  I just wanted to update you
on some of the financial trading issues in Brazil (and I have added you to
the working group list).  I am going to finalize our "swap matrix" for
Brazil.  On the physical trading side, I had asked a physical trading lawyer
to call you and am wondering if Elizabeth Sager ever called or emailed.
Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 05/04/2000 01:21:59 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Andrea.Bertone@enron.com, Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com,
Rick.Hopkinson@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br, Krishna@tozzini.com.br
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your message below. Please find attached hereto free
translation into English of new foreign investor's regulations in Brazil. We
are preparing a memo to you in connection with such new regulations and are
finalizing the matrix prepared last year. We will send them to you shortly.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/04 12:08 pm >>>

AFAC and Marcelo:  I hope this message finds you both well.  I would like to
finalize the matrix which was prepared last year so that we can create a
"baseline" for future updates.  Please feel free to date the matrix as of
December, 1999, if you wish.  Please forward any recent changes to me for
comment  and I will respond immediately.  Then we can move on to other things!
Thanks for your help and attention to this mattter.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
10:34
AM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 03/13/2000 06:27:26 PM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:   Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br
Subject:  Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your E-mail below. We will be reflecting the new changes in the
regulations in the chart and will be sending it to your review as soon as
possible.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 03/13 2:29 pm >>>

Greetings to you both!  It has been awhile since we last spoke.  I would like
to
finalize the matrix which we have been discussing since the latter part of
1999.
Although we were awaiting new Central Bank regulations, I am beginning to
think
that the Central Bank revisions will not impact the matrix except with respect
to transactions which may be entered into by entities that are the subject of
the Central Bank regulations.  Please let me know whether or not you agree or
can offer any suggestions.  Thanks and regards.  Sara

 - Res2689a.doc
 - Ins325a.doc


Rick,
Attached are drafts of the letters notifiying Williams, Apache and Lone Star
that ENA will be acting as agent for Tenaska IV. Please review the letters
and get back to me on the following items:

Person to send the letters to at the respective companies
Fax #'s to fax it to on Friday
Name and adress of ENA person to direct inquiries to
Name and phone number of person to direct questions re: the notification
letter
People at Tenaska to copy and their address and fax #'s
Comments on substance of the letter (please review carefully my reference to
what ENA is acting as agent for--it is specific as to noms, scheduling and
billing, not a general agency for all things under the contract--is that
correct?)

If you don't mind, please forward any email response to Bob Walker and leave
me a voicemail. I will be out of the office Friday, but checking voicemail
and coordianting with Bob to get these out.

Also, once we send these letters out, we should be prepared for each of these
entities to ask to see the agency agreement. They may, in fact, not be
comfortable dealing with ENA with just this letter.


Please review the attached outage report.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are approximately 65 NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 3rd floor.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNN	12404	804
CNBC	12405	805
MSNBC	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
Bloomberg	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. We are testing an additional software product to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, message logging and printing. This system is being tested within the environment and will be available in the next few weeks.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


Hope you had a great holiday season!  Just checking to see if there is any new info on my ESOP rollover error situation.  Let me know if you heard anything.

Tom


The Unix server that Unify Production runs on (Proton) went down this
morning.  The Unix team is working on it.  I will let you know as soon as
Unify is available.

d.n.


-----Original Message-----
From: Kyle, Candace [mailto:Candace.Kyle@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Alice (E-mail); Bobi Miesel (E-mail); Clare (E-mail); Daisy
(E-mail); Parks, Kim; Lmh (E-mail); Swann, Lori; Mary (E-mail); Mom
(E-mail); Susie (E-mail); Sylvie (E-mail); Terry (E-mail)
Subject: CPR Texas style

Two cowboys from Texas walk
into a roadhouse to wash the
trail dust from their throats.
They stand at the bar,
drinking a beer and talking
about current cattle prices.
Suddenly, a woman at a nearby
table, who is eating a sandwich,
begins to cough.
After a minute or so, it becomes
apparent that she is in real distress.
One of the cowboys looks at her
and say, "kin ya swaller?"
The woman shakes her head, no.
"Kin ya breathe?"
The woman begins to turn blue
and shakes her head.
The cowboy walks over to the woman,
lifts up the back of her dress,
yanks down her panties, and slowly
runs his tongue from the back
of her thigh up to the small
of her back.
The woman is so shocked, that
she has a violent spasm and the
obstruction flies out of her mouth.
As she begins to breathe again,
the cowboy walks slowly back to the
bar and takes a drink from his beer.
His partner says,
"Ya know, I'd heard of that there
"Hind Lick Maneuver, but ain't
never seen nobody do it."


Mark,

Your header is wrong on the 4th page.  The other pages say "David Berberian"
and the 4th Page has some other guys name.

	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	05/16/2001 04:41 PM

		 To: lmilfred@na.ko.com
		 cc: Jake Staffel/Enron@EnronXGate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, sallred@na.ko.com
		 Subject: Coke/Enron Non-Disclosure Agreement

Linda -

I have reviewed the below agreement that Stephanie forwarded.  It is
acceptable.

Please have Mr. Cosey sign the necessary originals and have them forwarded to
me or to Tana Jones at Enron.  Our address is 1400 Smith Street, Houston,
Texas 77002.  We will ensure countersignature by Enron.

If you should need anything, please call me or Tana (at 713-853-3399).

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 04:37 PM -----

	"Stephanie P. Allred" <sallred@na.ko.com>
	05/15/2001 11:34 AM

		 To: "Mark Greenberg" <mark.greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc: "Kevin Cherry" <kcherry@na.ko.com>, "Linda L. Milfred"
<lmilfred@na.ko.com>, "Maria Wheeler" <mwheeler@na.ko.com>
		 Subject: Enron Non-Disclosure Agreement

Mark,
Per our discussion last Friday, I am attaching a revised NDA which has your
proposed changes (not revision-marked) as well as the changes we propose to
make in additon to those (which are revision-marked).  The only
revision-marked changes are in the second paragraph regarding written and
oral disclosures.  After speaking with Linda Milfred (an attorney I work
with), we thought the change we made regarding oral disclosures is more
appropriate than what you and I discussed last week.  I will be out of the
office for the rest of the week, so:

1.   If the changes are acceptable, please call my assistant Maria Wheeler
and she can accept the changes and prepare originals for Jackson Cosey's
signature; or

2.   If the changes are not acceptable, please either call Linda Milfred at
(404) 676-6631 to discuss or leave a message for me and I will call you
back at the first of next week.

Regards,

Stephanie Allred

(See attached file: Enron NDA.DOC)
 - Enron NDA.DOC


eThink Stuff For Sale!
That's right; get your very own eThink apparel, accessories and office
gadgets at the Signature Shop online.  Direct your web browser to the
Signature Shop, and then click "eThink Merchandise" to see the complete
line.  Happy shopping!

eSpeak is back!  Tuesday, December 5 at 10:00 am Houston time, please join
Chairman and CEO Ken Lay for an open-mike eSpeak event.  This is your last
chance of the year to ask Ken questions about the issues most important to
you.  Don't miss it!


I have just received the letter SFA promised us.  SFA have accepted our
argument that our proprietary bond and equity trading can be carried on in
London through an unregulated UK entity.  The letter also states that SFA
will not be applying their consolidated capital supervision rules to the
unregulated entity, which they have the discretion to do.

From a regulatory perspective this means we can move ahead at full speed to
set up an appropriate Chinese Wall and then begin trading.

Best regards

Paul


Do I need to do anything?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 10:57 AM -----

	Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/08/2001 08:26 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:

Sara:

I received a call from Mega today.  That financial gas/power deal could come
together today.  Attached is the draft confirm you prepared.  Let me know
ASAP if you have any "issues" with closing this deal pursuant to the language
you prepared.  I will contact you immediately if it closes.

Thanks!

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Daryl DWORKIN on 10/24/2001 12:43:01 PM
---------------------------

 10/24/2001 11:55
        AM        Daryl DWORKIN
   BNP PARIBAS

 10/24/2001 11:55
        AM
                  ---------------------------------------------------

To:   Daryl DWORKIN

cc:

bcc:

Subject:  BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures AGA Survey......RESULTS!!

Here are this week's survey results.

AVG            +50
AVG w/o High & Low  +50
Median              +50
Standard Deviation   8
# of Responses       54
High           +74
Low            +30
Last Year           +71

Thank You!

Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 11:46 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	07/31/2000 02:15 PM

		 To: goetscrj@bp.com, kneenjm@bp.com, mcadammj@bp.com,
elaine@citizenspower.com, clong@enron.com, csandhe@enron.com,
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, laurie.ferber@gs.com,
hall2r@kochind.com, lanced@kochind.com, william.mccoy@msdw.com,
steven.kline@pge-corp.com, schindlg@phibro.com, mgoldstein@sempratrading.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comment Letter

Attached is our first draft of a comment letter on the CFTC's Regulatory
Reinvention proposal.  The comment letter must be submitted to the CFTC by
next Monday, August 7.  I would appreciate your comments by COB this
Wednesday, August 2.  Of course, I am available to discuss the draft as
well.  At this point, I do  not think we need to have a conference call on
this and we can just coordinate and assemble the comments.  If others feel
differently, please let me know.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Comment Letter.doc


Please review this list and our proposed solutions.  I would like for us to provide the consolidated list to Jeff on Monday, 07/30, (since we have no staff meeting next week).  Let me know if you see any omissions.

1) Management skills
    * Enable employees to provide anonymous feedback to other desk controllers
    * Management class

2) Mentality/Dedication of employees
    * Spread projects around within desk
    * Know what your employees goals are and try to assist them in achieving those goals
    * Amex gift cards (from both Risk and Trading)
    * Spend 2 weeks with new employees investing our time in them to help them learn
    * Have more group outings

3) Manual processes
    * Attend IT meetings (Greg)
    * employee for Greg

4) Development of analytical skills
    * Use quizzes as a tool to identify areas where employees are deficient
    * Let group members teach each other  (I don't remember exactly what this point was...help me re-word it)


Martin,
?
I've calculated the total points everyone has earned over the  course of the
season based on where they finished each week.? For ties, i  took total bench
points to determine ranking - i think that's the way we do  it.
?
Assuming we all started with 100:
Greg  Martin????????? 158
Mark Friedman???? 152
Gary Lamphier???? 147
Scott Earnest??????  144
Tony  Harris????????? 143
Jeff Gossett????????  142
Bill Kasemervisz? 141
Martin Cuilla???????  139
Mike Morris????????  138
Gary Taylor????????  136
?
Of course, this doesn't take into account the points we've bid  on for
players we've picked up during the year.
?
Gary


My emphasis on IS was just that she IS a VP of Enron Corp., not Enron Net
Works (which we found out yesterday she was not an officer of).

	Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 03:30 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: RE: FW: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

I know Beth Perlman is a VP of Enron Corp. ) that,s why I suggested she sign
the MOU instead of Philippe in my email to you yesterday.  I don,t understand
your emphasis on the word &is8.

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Ward, Bob
Cc: Greenberg, Mark
Subject: Re: FW: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Beth Perlman, who IS a VP of Enron Corp.

	Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 01:52 PM
		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Ogg/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Mark,

Please send a signed copy of the MOU to James Morris at the address below.
By the way, who signed the it?  Thank you.

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

-----Original Message-----
From:  James Morris [mailto:jammo@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Ward, Bob
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: RE: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Hey guys...
Send it to
1 Microsoft Way
Bldg 1 rm 2006
Redmond, WA 98052

Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Bob [mailto:Bob.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:29 AM
To: James Morris
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

James,

We have a signed copy of the MOU ready to send to you.  I need your address.
Thank you.
Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409


<<2rz503!.DOC>>  <<2RZ5RED.DOC>>  <<2R6LRED.DOC>>

Kay:

Enclosed is a revised draft of the proposed letter agreement for the 7EA
turbines reflecting Ben's business points and the matters discussed in our
telephone conference earlier today.  Also enclosed is a blacklined copy
reflecting revisions from the December 15, 2000 draft of the prototype
letter agreement.  Although we have enclosed a blacklined draft reflecting
revisions from the final draft of the CA/ED-I letter agreement, this is
difficult to read due to our re-arrangement of the reps and warranties.  If
you have any questions or comments, please advise.  (I have received the
courier package with the GE Facility Agreements).

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 129569v3
  129569vR3/2
  129569v3 R 128541v18

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2rz503!.DOC
 - 2RZ5RED.DOC
 - 2R6LRED.DOC


Please prepare an enfolio agreement.  Thanks


Would you like me to schedule a meeting to discuss real time data feeds to
customers? If so who should attend?

I also would like to follow up with True Quote and Houston Street from a
business perspective on the exchanges.  Is it ok for me to contact them to
get a feel on progress on their side.  If so who are the commercial contacts
at True Quotes and Houston Street?


you can go ahead and make the changes.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/15/2000 10:20 AM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Broker Fees

 453152   broker has .0075 - trader mistake/should be .0075 not .75

 450710  broker has .0075 - trader mistake/should be .0075

 451976  broker has .0075 - part of sleeve/either 451976 or 451977 should
have .0075 fee

 457489  broker has .0075 - no broker fee

 457465  broker has .0075 - no broker fee

 454511  broker has .0075 - part of sleeve/either 454511 or 454512 should
have .0075 fee

Would you like me to go ahead and make these changes? Please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/15/2000 08:04 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Broker Fees

can you check on the following fees:

453152   broker has .0075

450710  broker has .0075

451976  broker has .0075

457489  broker has .0075

457465  broker has .0075

454511  broker has .0075

thanks


Deer All:

I have a person that might fit what we are looking for in the 8th spot or to
fill a gap left by Joe (who is currently unable to provide a firm response).

B.J. Johnson. Played football with Chad and I at Jesuit. Was a year a head
of us. Met Zander at UH in College and hung with he and Brian while they
were rooming together. Went to lawschool a few years after me. Is out and
doing well with at a well known plaintiff's lawfirm.
Nice guy. He mentioned a year or so ago to call him if we ever had a spot.
His dad used to take him hunting and BJ wants to return the favor. Looking
for a place he could take his dad once or twice a year, just to get out
there not to shoot deer. He has two small girls, is busier than I am and
would go no more than the rest of the Houston boys.

He is a good guy. Don't know much about his deer hunting experience, but I
don't care about that.

Chad and Brian give him the stamp of approval. My thought is we could
proceed as set with Chris and I splitting the 8th spot, but if Joe winds up
taking a job out of state (which is a possibility) we would be left with two
spots to fill and less time to do it. I think it might be best to offer this
spot to BJ and fill up all 8 spots, then if we lose Joe, Chris and I can be
the fall back plan.

Thoughts and comments from the McComb guys please.

Erik.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Congratulations on a job done well in a short period of time.  Your note of thanks to everyone was a nice one.   I am sure that the team appreciates your leadership.  --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Stock, Steve
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:31 AM
To: DL-IT Front Office; Ballmer, Charles; Barber, Michael; Chitradurga, Sundar; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Luu, Duong; Nat, Steve; Nommensen, Dave; Ogden, Arlene; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Ray, Edward; Schomer, Chris; Tang, Mable; Warner, John; Wei, Zhiyong
Cc: McAuliffe, Bob; Webb, Jay; Perlman, Beth; Rub, Jenny; Johnson, Jeff; Greig, Iain; Smith, Regan M.; Kitchen, Louise; Pickering, Mark; Piper, Greg; Beck, Sally
Subject: Estate Migration
Importance: High

The Estate version of the systems were commissioned successfuly onto Estate hardware this weekend with the users completing their testing on sunday, and it looks as though we are in good shape for doing the same for NetCo this week.

Just a few weeks ago there was a lot of doubts that it could be done, but thanks to a great display of team work, and just plain hard work, with many late nights (and a few sleep overs....), we met our first major milestone!!!!!

Thanks for the outstanding efforts over the last two weeks, that made this weekend possible.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />best regards

Steve


FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 10:12
AM ---------------------------

Nick Moshou@ENRON
12/07/2000 10:13 AM
To: Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Spinnaker - Supply Verification 11958SU - October 2000
production

Christy,

Per our conversation I have attached below the updated version of the
Reallocation difference.   Texas General Land received 21.8945% of the total
volume which was 55,645 mmbtu.  After updating the spreadsheet Spinnaker will
owe HPL approximately $36,000.

Thanks,
Nick


I just spoke to Leon Branom on the activity in the accounting entity 1691 and agree it should be assigned to Todd.

Thanks,

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trujillo, Vicsandra
Sent:	Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Swafford, John; Ng, Mark; Fischer, Mary
Subject:	FW: Entity Changes - Co. 1691

Essie and Leon have proposed xferring Co. 1691 to your world (see below).  Do you concur?  Please let me know Monday morning.

Regards,
Vicsandra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Patricia A.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Trujillo, Vicsandra
Subject:	FW: Entity Changes

If you have not already made these decisions, Essie's guidance should be helpful.

Patty Lee
Corporate Tax
x35172
EB1774

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Essie Locklear
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 10:16 PM
To:	Patricia A Lee
Subject:	RE: Entity Changes

Please see my comments in red below.

Essie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Patricia
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Locklear, Essie
Subject:	Entity Changes

Essie,

Can you recommend where these companies each fit within the new organization?  If possible, can you also give an indication of the rank - 1 through 5?

Thanks,

Patty

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES on 09/17/2001 03:42 PM ---------------------------
From:	Leon Branom/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/17/2001 02:56 PM
To:	Vicsandra Trujillo/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Richard Laird/HOU/EES@EES, Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Entity Changes

I have a few entities that may need to change groups or be assigned to a group.

18T - EI Indonesia Operations LLC
	This entity is not in TIS, SAP, nor Hyperion.  The 2000 tax return has no income, assets, or liabilities.  There is a corporate data sheet for this company, but this entity seems to have been inactive since it's creation.

86M - Enron Net Works LLC
	Despite the name, this entity appears to be a MTM company.  Per September financials, this company has about $3M of MTM and about $8K of expenses, nothing else.

The next 5 companies were my responsibility while in EBS, and did not get assigned during the reorg.

80Y - Enron Broadband Acquisition, Inc.
	This entity was created in 2000 for the acquistion of WarpSpeed Communications (now Enron WarpSpeed Services, Inc. 83N), and then dissolved upon completion of merger.  Company is around with a small amount of assets and liabilities, but no I/S items.  83N is my responsibility.
	I think this entity should stay with 83N.  So I suggest it be assigned to Leon.  It should be 4 - easy.

1579 - EBS Network Co.
	Division of 17H.  This one should possibly be assigned to Networks & Services group.  Not currently on our list of companies.
	I think this could go to either Holding/Administrative Companies (Same as 17H) or Network & Services (Leon).  4 - easy.

1691 - EPI-EBS Europe
	Set up last month to centralize merchant asset activities.  Broke out the activities of 1179.
	A similar entity (1179) was assigned to Commodity and Trade (Todd Richards and Mary Fischer) so this one should be assigned to them as well.  4 - easy.

1307 - EBIC-Apache, LLC
	Rolls up to Cherokee Finance VOF, a CFC.
	Cherokee Finance VOF is assigned to North America (Glen Walloch and Kevin Walker).  Maybe this one should also go to them as the only tax which may have to be provided would be foreign tax.  4 - easy.

1689 - EPI-EBS Ventures, LLC
	Set up last month to centralize merchant asset activities.  Broke out the activities of 1307.
	Same as 1307.  It should be assigned to North America (Glen Walloch and Kevin Walker).  4 - easy.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Leon Branom
Senior Tax Analyst
Networks and Services
(713) 345-8702  office
leon.branom@enron.com


This memo will confirm the above referenced meeting will be held in Room
EB2868 tomorrow morning, 12/14/2000 at 9:00 a.m. Houston Time and 3:00 p.m.
London Time.  Next Thursday, December 21, it will be held in Room 50M03.

Claire/Lauren

For everyone calling in from the London office, please advise them to dial
the following number:  713-345-3324.  Also, since I was unable to find James
Nu on the email address, will you make sure he is aware of the room change?

Thank you in advance.

Dorothy


Sounds promising - keep it moving.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
06/26/2000 08:47 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FPL Update

We spent three days meeting with the FPL guys last week.  The meetings were
productive, and we are making progress.  Lew has instructed these guys to get
down into a lot of detail on the business plan/core competencies, which we
did!

They also floated the valuation of their existing assets - $3.1B for 3947 MWs
or $789/kW.  We walked them through our peaker valuation as well.  We didn't
debate the valuations, but rather we decided to go ahead and have Clement and
Jinsung try to pull together a consolidated model for NewCo.  That is being
done, and should be ready Monday/Tuesday.

It is apparent from these meetings that they are looking for ENRON to provide
several key pieces to NewCo (other than peakers and dev. projects):

1. Enron culture and emphasis on intellectual capital (including HR approach).
2. Trading and marketing expertise.
3. Enron style finance.
4. Select management spots.
5. Supplement development team.

The interesting debate is how we get compensated for the significant impact
that the Enron "halo" is going to have on NewCo's IPO ( particularly if we
deliver the items listed above).  I raised this incremental value issue with
them.

FPL's key pieces include:

1. Core "operating" competencies and asset management techniques.
2. Construction management techniques.
3.  Select management spots.
4.  National development team.

The FPL risk in this whole exercise is if Lew is unsuccessful in convincing
Broadhead that owning some % of NewCo is not a better value proposition that
owning 100% on FPLE; and/or the decision to wait until Florida deregulates
before spinning out FPLE.  Glenn Smith stopped by last week and he
highlighted these issues as well.

We have a lot of work to do this week including a need to determine Trading &
Marketing model; develop potential services agreements (QF, back office);
refine our financial model and expand to include new projects, turbine capx,
etc.; expand development framework;  pull pitch together to float NewCo by
investment bank, etc.....

I am happy to expand on exactly where we stand with FPL.  I guess we also
need to think about staffing if both Cinergy and FPL move forward (let's just
sell the peakers to Cinergy for $1.25B and let them do their own IPO).

Regards,

Don


6:30 ish.

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/05/2000 01:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

what time should I come over?


David, just heard that you joined the 2001 Enron MS150 team -
congratulations!  Look forward to seeing you out at Tully Stadium on the 20th.

Jeff


Susan,

I just returned from a four month maternity leave.  I have not seen executed
documents.  Attached are the final version of the documents on the system.  I
will track down the signed versions (if they were returned by EOTT during my
absence) and send you copies.

Stacy


(Thanks Mark)

Dear Jason

Currently, on our test site, we have

for Stock Quotes

 Current  Change  Time
ENE 68.81  +0.059  21:35 28 JUN 2000
DIS 39 5/32  -23/32  21:35 28 JUN 2000

for Headlines

UPDATE 1-US mulling best strategy in EU trade rows [Reuters (17:04)]
U.S. states urged to fight United Airlines merger [Reuters (16:57)]

What do you think?  I know we add text to the headlines when we give Reuters
credit for them (hence the '[Reuters . . .').  Do you think we can get by
with adding the time for the headlines?

About the stock quotes, what do you think?  I think the way it's currently
set out makes it looks like the price on the stock market at 21:35 is exactly
68.61 for ENE.  This is okay only if (i) that actually is the case (i.e.,
it's a Reuters time stamp from NYSE and not our own) and (ii) we're allowed
to do that in the contract.  What's the verdict?

Sorry to bother you both, but we are at the coding stage, and the sooner I
know that what we've been doing is correct or incorrect we can proceed or
modify what we're doing accordingly.

Many thanks in advance

Jay

From: Mark Taylor on 28/06/2000 14:28 CDT
To: James Bruce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

We may have a problem with adding our own time stamp.  First, I believe our
agreement with Reuters limits our ability to modify their content and
restricts what we can say about the current nature of the quotes (they are
time delayed) and second, we don't want our time stamp to make people believe
that the quote was even current as of that time - since it won't be.  It
might be ok to have the entire quotes section headed by a line indicating
when it was last refreshed.  Many sites providing quotes like this have a
line (usually towards the bottom) indicating the delay period and most people
using those sites know they have to refresh their screen to update them.
Jason Peters is the expert on the terms of that agreement, so if you still
feel like you need to add something you might check with him.

	James Bruce
	06/28/2000 11:26 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

Mark

As I understand it, the answer is 'no'--we get a quote from Reuters but not
the time stamp.  The time stamp that would appear is the one that we place
next to it, telling the user when the quote was placed on the site.  So if
you happen along at noon and you see 'ENE 70 9am', you know that you're most
certainly not getting a recent price.

Jay

From: Mark Taylor on 28/06/2000 11:05 CDT
To: James Bruce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

Will the Reuters feed contain a time stamp?  Some other sites let you know
what  time the trade was done that resulted in the quote.

	James Bruce
	06/28/2000 08:03 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

Dear Mark

Do you know of any legal issue that there could be about adding our own time
stamp to a stock quote from Reuters (so that people viewing the site would
know when the stock quotes were last updated by us)?

Let me know if I should direct this question to someone else.

Thanks Mark

Jay


thanks for the work on the new locations the changes are as follow below.

From:  Melba Lozano
  02/14/2001 11:54 AM

To: Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Please review new locations

Steve,

Please review the attached language for the new locations.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

Location:	Misc.Northwest pipeline gas  North of Green River
Abbreviation:
(as it appears on the web)
	< NW No. GR >
Sort Code:	4550
Description:
(as it appears on the web)	The transaction is for receipt point gas, North of
Green River, south of Kemmer at seller,s choice of point on Northwest
Pipeline.
REQ'D BY:	Steve South

Location:	Misc. Northwest pipeline gas  South of Green River
Abbreviation:
(as it appears on the web)
	< NW So. GR>
Sort Code:	4550
Description:
(as it appears on the web)	The transaction is for receipt point gas, South of
Green River at seller,s choice of point on Northwest Pipeline.
REQ'D BY:	Steve South


Yes, my sister, you have been heavy on my mind.....is everything okay with you?  How are the proceedings coming along?

Everything on my end is okay...still alot of unanswered questions and i'm just waiting to get answers.  The positive is that we do have a buyer for the trading group....because it could of easily have been the situation, whereby, nobody was interested.  Thank God that did not happen.

I've got to plan a birthday party for Jordan next week, and as usual, i'm wracking my brain trying to decide what to do,  I detest parties on Saturday at these public place because of the large crowds.  Got any ideas?

By the way, has Marcus learned how to read yet?  Jordan tells me he really wants to learn how to read, and I want to make sure that my baby is not behind the rest of the pack.  I went to the library yesterday and checked out about 7 books for my baby.  We are some reading fools these days.

Write back!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Valada Brawner" <VBrawne@nicor.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:15 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	When this email reaches you, I pray that you are fine and well. Just because I have not spoken to y

When this email reaches you, I pray that you are fine and well.  Just because I have not spoken to you, does not mean I don't MISS YOU.

VAL


Good morning.

I'm looking for a confidentiality agreement between ENA and Peoples Energy
Resources on or around Nov. 23, 1999.  Can either of you help me?

Thanks,

Kay


ben
I thought about this after we talked.  You probably don't have a copy of the
model after Sean Keenan made adjustments to the balance sheet.  It now
balances.


Great news.  With respect to the Commissoners, I think it makes sense to go
back through Ellen and ask if she could set up meetings with a few
commissioners ater the staff briefing.

"wgramm" <wgramm@osf1.gmu.edu> on 07/17/2001 03:23:19 PM
Please respond to <wgramm@osf1.gmu.edu>

To: "Jerry Ellig" <jellig@gmu.edu>, "Steve Kean" <skean@enron.com>

cc: "Susan Dudley" <SDudley@gmu.edu>

Subject: FERC course on for Thurs, July 26, 1-4 p.m.

Susan got it done -- it'll be Thursday, July 26, 1-4 p.m. at FERC (a room on
the 3rd floor?).  Susan has talked with Bill Albrecht.  He'll probably be
coming in on Wed. p.m. Steve, any ideas about a Commissioner strategy?
(invite them to attend, if the FERC folks agree; ask the FERC folks to do
the inviting; ask the FERC folks to help set up meetings afterwards or a
follow on if they like what we do and think it useful for Commissioners; try
to do a walkaround -- that is, offer to have Jerry, Bill, Susan visit
commissioners individually Friday a.m. after the course or Thursday a.m.
before the course?) Wendy

Wendy Gramm, Regulatory Studies Program
Mercatus Center
George Mason University
703-993-4884


Mr. Enloe -

Ken Lay asked me to let you know that regrettably he will be in Europe, so
unable to attend the dinner.

Rosalee

"Enloe, Ted" <Ted.Enloe@COMPAQ.com> on 08/10/2000 02:08:44 PM
To: "Capellas, Michael" <Michael.Capellas@COMPAQ.com>, "Chris A. Davis
(E-mail)" <Cdavis@onisystems.com>, "George H. Heilmeier (E-mail)"
<ghh@telcordia.com>, "Judith L. Craven (E-mail)" <lynnj@iname.com>, "Kenneth
L. Lay (E-mail)" <klay@enron.com>, "Kenneth Roman (E-mail)"
<kenroman@worldnet.att.net>, "Lawrence T. Babbio Jr. (E-mail)"
<babbio@BellAtlantic.com>, "Lucille S. Salhany (E-mail)" <lucie@jhmedia.com>,
"Peter N. Larson (E-mail)" <hkiss@bruncorp.com>, "Thomas J. Perkins (E-mail)"
<kjewett@kpcb.com>
cc:
Subject: Friday, September 29, 2000

I would like to request that you reserve the evening of Friday, September
29, 2000 for a dinner in New York honoring Ben Rosen as he retires from the
board of Compaq Computer Corporation.

Further details (time, location, etc.) will follow.

Please reply to this email ASAP and let me know your availability.

Thanks, Ted


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wright, Lee
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Bodyshop
Subject:	Security Smart ID Tags-Off Property Usage

To remain consistent with Enron's directive to improve security access to the building, all Enron Body Shop members are required to check-in at the Body Shop Front Desk and present an Enron Photo ID badge or another form of Photo ID to the Security Officer each time you visit.  To assist our members who participate in outdoor activities during their visit, Security SMART ID tags are available at the Body Shop Front Desk for your convenience.  Simply slide the SMART ID tag through the shoe laces between an eyelet and snap the tag closed.

The SMART ID tags serve both as a safety identification tag while members are exercising off property as well as provide the security identification verification required when entering the Body Shop.  Each day you plan to exercise outside, present your Enron Photo ID Badge or another form of Photo ID to the Front Desk Receptionist to receive your temporary Security SMART ID.  Your Photo ID will be returned to you when you return the SMART ID tag to the Front Desk at the end of your visit.


We have secured the open marketers seat on the Advisory Committee at the
MISO.  This is a 2  year commitment.

Jeff


Brian,

Unfortunately I won't be able to make it, but thanks for the email.  Hope
everything
is going well with you.  Have a great time at the party and tell Sweets I
said Happy
B'day.

Kevin


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 02:23 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	12/19/2000 02:09 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-430) Margin Rate Change for Natural Gas

Notice No. 00-430
December 19, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE FOR BACK MONTH CONTRACTS

Effective Date:    Tuesday, December 19, 2000 (close of business).

Futures Contract:  Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures.

Contract Months: April 2001 Through December 2003;
***FORWARD 3 MONTH MARGINS REMAIN UNAFFECTED BY THIS NOTICE***

Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Margins on Back Month Henry Hub

Natural Gas Futures Contracts

Effective Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 (close of business)
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):            Old:  $14,000  New:  $7,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin):                Old:  $15,400  New:  $7,700
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $18,900  New:  $9,450

Current systems calculate the margin requirement for spread positions by
first determining the "Scan Risk" and then multiplying the number of spreads
by a rate set by the Exchange.  Scan Risk is determined by netting the
outright margin required for each leg of a spread.

Because there is a difference between the outright margin required for the
January, February, and March 2001 delivery months and other months, each
spread which includes one leg in either the January, February, or March 2001
delivery months will have its requirement (at the clearing member rates)
calculated at $9,500 starting on Tuesday December 19th.  This figure is
determined as follows:

Example At Clearing Member Rates for December 19th Margin Change:
One Long January, February, or March 2001 NG  (1 x $14,000)   =        $14,000
One Short April 2001 - December 2003 NG     (1 x $7,000)    =   -     $  7,000
Net Scan Risk                         ($14,000-$7,000) =        $  7,000
Spread Rate                          (1x $2,500)     =   +     $  2,500
Total Requirement                                 =        $  9,500

NYMEX Division Margins on Natural Gas Futures Spreads - Requirements for
Spreads with One Leg in Designated Months

January 2001 ) March 2001
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):               $  9,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin):                   $10,450
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):               $12,825

NYMEX division margins on Natural Gas Futures spreads comprised exclusively
of months April 2001 through December 2003 will remain unchanged.

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&r
efdoc=(00-430)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I'll give it a look.

ckm

From: Heather Kroll/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/15/2001 07:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Acceptance Test for FCEL

Kay,

I am gathering responses to Interrogatories from the CT AG, CL&P, UI and some
enviro group called Environment Northeast regarding our fuel cell filing with
the DPUC.  Can you help me answer the following questions?  And if you can,
will you?  Ultimately, we want to respond with as little information as
necessary to answer the exact question and to offier nothing else to them.
Usual stuff.

Thanks,

Heather

EN-1. Describe the &acceptance test8 referred to on page 3 of your testimony,
including performance standards and the period of time over which they will
be  measured.

EN-12 Please provide copies of any technical, engineering or other reports
developed by or on behalf of CRRA concerning this project or the use of fuel
cells.

 I've asked Steve Plauche and Scott Healy to answer this too so answer only
if you know anything different.

I very much appreciate it!


I've attached a draft of WPTF's reply to the resopnses of FERC and the
ISO/Oversight Board to WPTF's motion for judicial notice of various documents
surrounding the price cap incident this summer in the governance appeal,
along with a response to FERC's and the ISO/Oversight Board's motion to
strike portions of our initial brief related to those documents.

I look forward to discussing this with you on Monday.

Ron

 - 0129438.01


I have written a C++ code to do the following: For a given curve,
the code will filter out the seasonal factor.  It then fits the deseasoned
curve to a smooth function of the form  f(t)=a+A/(t+B)c, with 0<c<.5. ?The curve fitting is achieved by using Conjugate Gradient method. ??As Tanya pointed out, this form of function ensures that  ?f(t)2*t - f(t-1)2*(t-1) >0, which is useful in calculating forward-forward ?vol. ?The outputs are season patterns (2 different patterns are allowed)?and the smoothed curve.  One can then calculate forward-forward vol?from the smoothed curve and superimpose the seasonal factors back?onto the curve.??This procedure is not useful for VaR calcuation. However, I believe it ?is useful for other situations which require the knowledge of  seasonal ?forward-forward vols.  For example, in power plant valuation and?credit exposure simulations, it would reflect the reality more closely?if we add seasonality to our forward-forward vol in simulating the forward?prices. ??Attached are the spreadsheet and XLL file. I will forward the C code if?any of you is interested. ??Alex??


Good Morning Vince,

Here is my email address for your reference.
 sburchett@RiskLimited.com

Cheers,
Shannon

Risk Limited Corporation

Box 612666 Dallas, Texas 75261 USA Tel: 972.245.8300 Fax:  972.245.8318 www.RiskLimited.com


I need you guys to look at this quick and give me advice.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/12/2001
06:11 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Craig Buehler                           02/12/2001 02:50 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ranelle Paladino/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jo
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EOL Routing/Approval - Urgent

***  EOL ROUTING ***

Please send your approval by return email, to Craig Buehler, for the EOL
packages listed on
the attached spreadsheet.  Each of the packages (22 in total) shows the path,
sustainable capacity
and proposed rate for each product.  The rates are estimated to provide a
measure for the dollar
amount of the discount (per our current discount policy).  These 22 products
are the initial deals
being offered; subsequent packages will be routed as they are developed.
Please call Craig, at
713-853-6964, if you have questions.  After approval by Legal, Reg Affairs
and Marketing, the
approvals and/or comments will be forwarded to Danny McCarty for review.

Thanks,

Craig


There were some schedule changes to april and may due to some training
classes on the last weeekend in April.  If anyone has conflicts let me know
or trade where possible.

ryan