Karissa-

Thanks for the information.  Tobias just clarified that it is 3,500 instead of 35,000.  Based on these specs we will get you
the price quote by tomorrow afternoon.  We will contact you tomorrow.

Thanks again-
Vanessa Carranza
DealBench
vanessa.carranza@dealbench.com
713-853-5030	office
1-877-368-7170      toll free
832-524-4713	cellular

Karissa Johnson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/08/2001 04:03 PM
To:	Vanessa Carranza@ECT, Tobias Munk@ECT
cc:	Tami Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Gantt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosalinda V Gonzalez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Darlene McKeever/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:	Contract Listing

Attached is a document that lists the projects that we believe would be included in our data room. We expect
roughly 3,000-3,5000 documents and between 5-10 potential bidders. Based on this information, please provide
 a price quote.

Best regards,
Karissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Karissa Johnson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/09/2001 04:44 AM ---------------------------

	 Rosalinda V Gonzalez  02/08/2001 11:15:58 AM

To:	Tami Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karissa Johnson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Gantt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Shemeika S Landry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Lowry@ECT

Subject:	Contract Listing

Per your request, attached the a list of the documents/contracts we have for each asset (per the file categories indicated).  Note that some spreadsheets contain more than one asset as this report was created by country.  In these cases, I highlighted each asset in different colors to indicate where one project ends and another begins.

Please advise of any questions.
Rosalinda
x67929


Note:If you do not want to receive notice of any upcoming programs, please
reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line. You also can limit
notices to specific topics by replying and specifying the topics. Thank
you.

Dear Mr. Dasovich,

Power & Water conference: Water is a critical path for every energy project
and this year it has become more important than ever. A new administration
adds yet another complicating factor to the Pacific Northwest's water and
energy uncertainties. This program's distinguished faculty, including
Judity Johansen (now CEO of PacifiCorp) and former Senator Slade Gordon,
will provide insights that will help anyone dealing with water and energy
supply issues to move more surely through these troubled times.

When/Where: August 16 & 17 at the Renaissance Madison Hotel in Seattle.

Program Co-chairs: Randall J. Hardy of Hardy Energy Consulting and
Elizabeth Thomas of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP.

Information or registration: reply to this announcement; call us at (800)
854-8009; or visit our web site:
http://www.lawseminars.com/htmls/seminars/01powa.

--------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 by Law Seminars International
All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------


Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 25,000 MMBtu/dy for 8/2/00.

The redeliveries will be:

7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley
17,200 to PG&E


----- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 11:56 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/01/2001 05:17 PM

		 To: Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>
		 cc: Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>
		 Subject: [Fwd: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan]

Karen,

I just wanted you to be aware of Edelman's activities on direct access.

Scott

Received: (qmail 77871 invoked by uid 41); 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: from nycxims1.edelman.com (63.96.56.110)  by mx7.quiknet.com with
SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: by nycxims1.edelman.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<FY7A0FGF>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <F1011D165600D411AC5400D0B720EE10A621F8@SFOXMB1>
From: "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
To: dhunter@smithandkempton.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@cmta.net, jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com,
kmills@cfbf.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mday@gmssr.com,  nplotkin@tfglobby.com,
spahnn@hnks.com, wlarson@calstate.edu,  vincent.stewart@ucop.edu,
gharrison@calstate.edu, sgovenar@govadv.com,  hgovenar@govadv.com,
smccubbi@enron.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com,  theo@ppallc.com,
cra@calretailers.com, mmoretti@calhealth.org,  wbrown@lhom.com,
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com, "DiMare, Dominic"
<Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, vjw@ceert.org, rcavanagh@nrdc.org,
rochmanm@spurr-remac.org, rrichter@calhealth.org, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com,
dennis.flatt@kp.org, richard.seguin@kp.org, arm@phaser.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"  <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>,  "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Warner, Jami"  <jami.warner@edelman.com>
Subject: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A139.07D39B10"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Hello to the Direct Access Coalition:

Below you will find a summary of the press strategy that Edelman Public
Relations intends to employ over the coming weeks in collaboration with the
Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and the broader Direct Access Coalition.
I will also outline the information that I need from Direct Access Coalition
members who are willing to be involved in media outreach and interviews.
And finally, I have attached supporting documents that you can use as
background material to prep for your responses to any media inquiries that
you may receive.

This Week

1.   We are drafting a "pitch letter" to send out by the end of this week
via blast e-mail and fax to the following media lists: 1)capitol press corps
reporters; 2) mainstream media reporters working the energy crisis; and 3)
trade media.  We may also outreach to our editorial board list as well.  Our
pitch will be focused on what it will really mean for small business and C&I
customers to lose the option of retail choice at a time when they are
suffering the financial hardships of skyrocketing energy bills. We will
address the effect on California's future business climate if direct access
is not preserved through legislation that corrects the problems that AB1x
caused for retail choice.  And finally, we will address the point that no
matter what direction California ultimately takes, direct access must be a
part of the solution.  Reporters have seen the recent polls which illustrate
California businesses' concerns with the path the state is on so this is a
prime opportunity to build on those recent media stories.

2.    We recommend a conference call with AReM and the Direct Access
Coalition on Friday to address the questions and suggestions on the press
strategy outlined here.

3.     Determine which people in the Direct Access Coalition are willing to
take media calls on behalf of the coalition.

Next Week

1.   Follow up with key reporters who received the pitch letter.

2.   Evaluate the language of SB 27x and determine whether there will be an
opportunity to hold a news conference with Sen. Bowen in the near future.
Monitor movement at the PUC and determine whether a press conference may be
effective in this arena, or whether we may need to use the option of sending
a media alert before the March 7 hearing, followed by a news release after
the hearing.

3.   Place op-eds (opinion pieces) with key newspapers.

4.   Contact radio news shows and TV public affairs shows (i.e. California
Capitol Week and the California Report) to secure
media interviews.

5.    Revise the SB 27x fact sheet (attached) to reflect the realities of
the amended language in SB 27x.

 What We Need From You

1.  If you are willing to speak with the media, or you have
customers/clients with a positive direct access story to tell, please
respond to this email as soon as you can with your name and contact
information.

2.  If you have draft op-eds written that need to be placed with newspapers
on behalf of your association and the broader coalition, we are willing to
do this for the you.

3.  If you have colleagues and/or staff that are already working with the
media it would be helpful to have this information so that we can
collaborate as necessary.

The Documents Below
>  All documents are works in progress, so if you have suggestions on
> potential changes, please feel free to share them with us.
>

Thank you.

>  <<AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc>>
>  <<Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc>>  <<AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc>>  <<AREM Fact
> FINAL3.doc>>
>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>

 - AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc
 - Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc
 - AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc
 - AREM Fact FINAL3.doc


Start Date: 12/15/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121501.txt


Disregard prior message re forms and please review this attachment instead.

Mary


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 10:51 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	RE: Additional Book to Move

Darron,

Please confirm the following:
1. I can't find the book ENA-WT-SOCAL in Estate database (please provide the CP ID)
2. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PRICE (CP ID 11360)
3. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PR-OPT (CP ID 92649)
4. Commodity code: NG or NGGJ?
5. Please provide the cutoff date to determine active deals (e.g. instr_end_dt > ? 1-jan-2002?)
6. Use ENA CP ID 1305 as the other side counterparty?

If I can have all the answers soon then I think the deals move can be completed around 3:00p.m.

Thanks,
Cecilia
x53362

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 8:55 AM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Additional Book to Move

Cecilia,
In addition to moving the deals detailed in my previous email, please move only financial deals with the same counterparties from NG-PR-OPT to ENA-WT-SOCAL.  I realize it's a big list, but how long will the entire process take?  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	More Counterparties

Attached is a long list of counterparty names to move from NG-PRICE into ENA-WT-SOCAL.  Please move only financial deals only.  Please let me know when this is complete.  Thanks.

DG

 << File: PositiveMTMCounterparties.xls >>


Thanks Jeff.  No problem getting off the call as I think you had the time to
more than adequately describe the situation in California.  We are going to
allow OPIC to continue on the path towards loan approval for our project and
see whether any problems flare up from Congressman Sherman.  We're keeping an
eye on whether any other folks in the political realm here in Washington try
to utilize some of Sherman's rhetoric in other instances.  From what I've
heard from you and the GE guys, I'd say there is ample, factual information
to refute such misguided claims.  Thanks again for your help.  Best regards,
Scott

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	05/15/2001 09:50 PM

		 To: Scott Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Sorry I had to get off the call early.  Hope it helped.  If there's anything
else you need, just let me know.

Best,
Jeff


Thank you for the drafts.  We are working on comments and hope to get you a redraft this week.
Question - Can we incorporate Enron Capital $ Trade International (and LD's UK subsidiary) with the U.S. group or should we leave it as U.S. only?
Please give me a call at 203-761-8497 if you have questions.
Bill Rippe
	"Heard, Marie" <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>   11/15/2001 06:34 PM  	                 To:        <rippew@louisdreyfus.com>          cc:        "Williams, Jason R (Credit)" <Jason.R.Williams@ENRON.com>          Subject:        Master Netting Agreement

Pursuant to Jason Williams's request, I am attaching our form master
netting agreement.
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com
                                                                    <<Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h
v1.doc>>                   <<Master Netting Agreement Credit Support Annex 10
d.doc>>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h v1.doc
 - Master Netting Agreement Credit Support Annex 10 d.doc


Here's the letter with some slight changes.
Drew and I thought it better to mention the interconnect for regulatory
reasons.  Questions? let's chat.
Thanks.


This is o.k. for Ken Lay, but we are changing to a more uniform address, so
would likely be better to use kenneth.lay@enron.com.

"Richard Everett" <richarde@centurydev.com> on 06/06/2000 10:36:39 AM
Please respond to <richarde@centurydev.com>
To: <bbh@group1auto.com>, <bdussler@palmetto-partners.com>,
<ecockrel@COCKRELL.COM>, <savoycap@msn.com>, <hjp@pappasrestaurants.com>,
<jim_braniff@ajg.com>, <jdddec@insync.net>, <klay@enron.com>,
<mnk@caller.infi.net>, <mfc-mca@worldnet.att.net>,
<nsholmes@parkwayinvestments.com>, <posres@aol.com>, <pway@wayholding.com>,
<rodc@insource.com>, <tcarey@crcevans.com>, <WalterPye@email.msn.com>
cc:
Subject: Test send

This is a "test email send" of the WPO Forum Group from Richard Everett.  By
return email, please verify that you received this message and let us know if
there is another email address that you prefer us to use.

Thank you.

Joy Powell
Executive Assistant
to Richard Everett
713/871-5119
===================================================
NOTE: The information in this email is confidential
and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, you must not read, use or
disseminate the information. Although this email
and any attachments are believed to be free of any
virus or other defect that might affect any computer
system into which it is received and opened, it is
the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted
by Century Development or any of its affiliates for
any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
====================================================


The PanEnergy spreadsheet is attached.

D


The issue of respect can be addressed in one simple two word phrase - DRAFT
DODGER!!


Received form Doug. I will talk to Doug and update you as appropriate.  Please let me know if you wish instead to schedule a meeting on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	'danielle.jaussaud@puc.state.tx.us'
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Portz, David; Forney, John M.
Subject:	FW: Texas PUC Request
Importance:	High

Danielle,

Thank you for the invitation to discuss scheduling activities for the month of August. As I am sure you are aware this company is undergoing a significant period of turmoil. It would therefore be of great help if you could send a list of specific questions so that we may be able to answer them directly.

If it would aid your understanding of our activity, we have full requirement obligations in both the North and South zones that were to ramp up starting in July. This load was to reach in excess of 100 MW by September. However, the speed of switching and the location of this load were not known. In addition, we have resources off 2 power plants, both located in the South. One of these plants is consistently subjected to various types of command and control dispatch by the ISO and we are obligated to find a market for any residual energy.

I trust this paints a picture of what we do and can help clarify any questions you may have. At this time, I do not feel we are in a position to comment on the actions of other QSEs as any information we have would be purely anecdotal.

I trust all is well,

Doug Gilbert-Smith
Director, Ercot Trading

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Day, Smith L.
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	Texas PUC Request
Importance:	High

See info. below. I received a call this a.m. from the PUC.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jaussaud, Danielle" <Danielle.Jaussaud@puc.state.tx.us>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Subject:	FW: Meeting Request

> I would like to invite you to meet with the PUC Market Oversight Division
> (MOD) staff to discuss certain load scheduling activities of the Enron
> Power Marketing QSE.  The MOD staff is trying to correctly interpret the
> load scheduling data we have analyzed for the month of August 2001, and we
> believe that a meeting would be mutually beneficial in that respect.
> Please let us know who would be the Enron representative who could best
> answer questions about your company's scheduling activities, and whether
> that person would be available in the afternoon of Monday, December 3.
> This is an informal meeting and we do not intend to have a PUC lawyer at
> the meeting.  However, if you do decide to have an attorney represent you
> at the meeting, please advise us.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation and best regards.
>
> Danielle Jaussaud
> Director of Economic Analysis
> Market Oversight Division
> Public Utility Commission
> 512-936-7396


This is a very important working meeting of the Blackout Busters, where we
will be voting on some proposals. We will not be able to reopen any of these
issues in the full committee. Therefore if you have any input to the these
documents, please participate.

The OBMC program is very critical to many of us who want a way out of rolling
blackouts this summer? by committing to curtailing demand when requested.

Many of us discussed? the PG&E,s proposal to CPUC for this program last week,
and determined that it is simply unworkable in its current proposed form.
SVMG must propose specific modifications to make it workable for us.

The Administrative Law Judge was very cooperative. He was planning to issue
the ruling on Friday, March 9, but agreed to wait for out input. He advised
that even though the comment period is over, he would entertain our comments
if we filed petition to file late comments and followed some legal
procedures.

Based on input received from other members, I prepared a working document.
John Wilson from CEC volunteered and converted the working document into a
draft petition. Paul Stephens hand delivered the draft petition to the Judge
on Wednesday. Please note that the draft petition included here is different
than what Paul handed over to the Judge. The two references to the
Transmission level customers were removed at the last minute without much
discussions. However, technically, the petition can not be accepted since it
was not filed with proper legal process. Justin is working to get the legal
support. Meanwhile, we have time this afternoon to review the petition at the
Blackout Busters meeting and make changes, if needed.

In the tradition of SVMG, I outlined our criteria for making any specific
suggestion in the working document. Please review it and bring your comments
to the meeting.

Mukesh Khattar
Energy Director
Oracle Corp.
(650) 506-6980
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@@@@@@_________++++++
?
?
?

Nayeem Sheikh wrote: I agree with Mukesh.

Thanks
Nayeem
?

At 09:47 AM 03/12/2001 -0800, Mukesh Khattar wrote:
I was planing till 2:45. It is less than 10-minute drive from United Defense
to Exodus at that time.

Mukesh Khattar

Laura Goldseth wrote:

 Mukesh & Nayeem, Because nearly 90% of the people who participate in the
 Blackout Busters meeting also attend the Energy Committee Meeting, we were
 hoping that the Blackout Busters meeting be adjourned around 2:30 allowing
 time for participants to travel to Exodus for the Energy Meeting.? Thanks
 for your help in making the schedule work.? Laura

 - SVMG OBMC letter 030701.doc
 - Working Draft Attachment, 030701.doc
 - SVMG_OBMC attachment 030701 Draft.doc
 - mukesh.khattar.vcf


Barry,  Attached is the GTC form without any revisions for any credit
language.  Darren will be getting back with me shortly on the credit issues.


hi


Kate, I don't know if you've received any response, but new counterparty
requests should be directed to the Global Counterparty group.  In this case,
Sam Schott should be able to help you as he does requests for alpha S-Z.
Bernice Rodriguez is his back up.  I set up Enron entities.

Thanks,

Cheryl x33103

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/09/2001 02:06 PM

To: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: New CTPY Name Request

Because I'm not quite sure who to direct this request to, I'm e-mailing
everyone I think might be involved in entering new counterparty names. One of
our mid-marketers has executed a deal with Sierra Pacific Holding Company,
which is a new counterparty name and needs to be added as a choice in
Enpower. Please let me know if I've contacted the correct people, and if I've
contacted the incorrect people. (Sorry!)

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


See below
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Young/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 04:42
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amanda Huble                           12/06/2000 04:39 PM

To: Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jessica
Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Please forward this message to your groups...

Dr. Gary Ross (PIRA CEO)  will here tomorrow to discuss the global oil
markets.

Thursday Dec 7, 2000 in room 8c1 from 3:30 to 5.

Thank you,
Amanda Huble


Please note, the Resolution Center hours have been reduced to 6 a.m. - 7 p.m. Monday thru Friday. You may contact the Resolution Center at 713-853-1411 or submit requests on-line at http://itcentral.enron.com.

We appreciate your cooperation in advance.

Customer and Business Services
Global Infrastructure


Sorry guys.  I'm still working on the February invoice to CES.  I estimate
that everyday this invoice does not get out cost Enron about $4,000 a day.
Feel free to call my boss Scott Neal about the problems you are having.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:46
AM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
03/13/2000 09:33 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

John Singer told me these two producers' deals expired 12/31/99.  We will not
need these set up.

Producer   Pipe  Status

Burkland, Richard  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

Burkland, WIlliam S  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

What is the status on these producers ?  I have invoices and I need to pay
these ASAP, especially Questa (they are calling).

Questa Petroleum  CPA   Deal  213088 set up with meter number per 9911 pay
statement.  Production statement for volumes
      received from John Singer 3/8/00

Phoenix Dominion  CPA/Cipco Deal 142669  Producer invoice available for
information

T & F Operating  PennFuel Invoice in. Deal not set up. Not able to identify
which Penn Fuel (56 or 56W) on CGAS


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 02:51 PM
---------------------------

Kenneth Horton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/16/2000 05:13 PM
To: Sally Beck@ECT
cc: Lynn Bellinghausen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Doorstep Meeting

Sally,

Following our Doorstep meeting today, I am following up on your request that
I forward to you the list of Portland transactions for which we still require
documentation, e.g. invoices, SAP entries, etc.  For the Settlements testing
only, we reduced the deal population from 23 to ten randomly-selected
transactions, in order to facilitate the Settlement group's ability to
complete both its monthly close obligations and our Doorstep request.  The
deal selection is indicated in yellow, and the missing items, in green.

Also per your request, attached are the five "non-standard" deals for which
we have been unable to obtain any information at all.  Our primary need is
just to get a basic understanding of these transactions.

Colorado Springs Utilities  10/1/98-9/30/03 Colorado 50-150 MWs
BPA     10/1/01-12/31/05 NW Delivered 105 MWs
Welded Tube    1/1/98-6/30/05 PGE - NW 5.2-12MWs
British Columbia Power Exchange 1/1/98-1/1/15 COB 85-176 MWs
Harbor Cogen

Thank you for your help, Sally,
Ken


OOOOOOOOOO Yes!  Thank Ya Jeeeesus!

Carolyn Ashley <Cashley@poha.com> on 10/05/2000 08:07:37 AM
To: "'dana.davis@enron.com'" <dana.davis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Choir Rehearsal

No choir rehearsal tonight.  The Winds of Change" choir from the prison will
be singing.  Don't forget we go to Mt. Corinth Sunday afternoon at 3:30 with
Pastor Wallace.  That's Rev. Lisa's church in Humble.

Carolyn H. Ashley
Training & Development Manager
Port of Houston Authority
Phone:  (713) 670-2619
Fax:  (713) 670-2457
E-mail:  cashley@poha.com


I thought you would like this
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Legler, Michael J.; Gomez, Julie A.; Bass, Eric; Martin, Thomas A.; Baumbach, David; Redmond, Brian; Bryan, Gary; Buss, JD; Farmer, Daren J.; Brawner, Sandra F.; Hull, Bryan; Parks, Joe; Rabon, Chance; Ryder, Patrick; Vuittonet, Laura; Weldon, V. Charles; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Gaskill, Chris; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	FW: Give a soup

> >
> > Check it out.
> >
> >
> > People in New York and DC are going to be having to hit food banks
hard.
> > There will be a need in NY for the soup. Below is an easy way to
> help....
> >
> > Campbell's is donating a can of soup to area food banks just by
clicking
> on
> > a football helmet at their website. It's quick, easy, and can be done
> once
> a
> > day.
> >
> > Go to (http://www.chunky.com/click_for_cans.asp) then click on your
> favorite
> > team's helmet and Campbell will donated a can of soup. That is it!
> Please
> > pass this to a friend or 2,3,4...
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals
> .


Isabel:  It is ok to pay this invoice per Randy Gay.  If you need anything
else just let me know.  Thanks.


Steve,

Taking summer interns is the best way to screen and identify good candidates
at low cost and low risk. I would take this person in,
assuming you can still run it by the Analyst/Associate program. They closed
the books
for the summer.

Let me know if you run into any roadblock. I shall try help you from here.

Vince

Steven Leppard
03/29/2000 08:31 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: here it goes!

Vince

Do you have any views on taking summer interns here in the Research group in
London?  One of our Analysts has recommended a friend of hers (resume
attached).  I'm sure we could dream up some work for an intern, so let me
know what you think.

Many thanks,
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 03/29/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

Zuzana Strmenova
02/23/2000 10:51 AM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: here it goes!

Thanks, a lot Steve.


I know you are excited about the holidays but
DON"T FORGET-

Mike McConnell, President and CEO of EGM, November 28 from 12 to 1 in EB 30C

Call or email Stacey Dempsey.


Attached is the spreadsheet.  I have updated the Retail Choice and the C&I
lists.  If something is shaded, I am still investigating.  I am now working on
the Wholesale list.  If you have any questions, please call me.

 - Transport Master List for                     Enron.xls


| notifications                                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Zereoue, Amos added to Money Shots's rosters, and Jackson, James dropped.
If you have a cell phone or pager, you can get this information even sooner! Go to your league's web site and click "Options, Notifications" on the main toolbar to have notifications sent to your pager or phone, via text messaging.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffn1106v.cgi
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.       |
|  Your site is always at http://football.fantasy.sportsline.com/spoogers  |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

FB10SP


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012315.txt


Where the heck is Somerset?  And who cares anyway?

I hope you had a happy New Year buddy.  Indrid and I went to Lulling City Market over the weekend.  That is without a doubt the best BBQ I have ever had.    YOU DE MAN!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Goodell, Scott
Sent: Wed 1/2/2002 11:13 AM
To: Anastas, Sherry
Cc: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: New Contracts

To my knowledge, we are not agent for these guys anymore.  I will double check with Germany, but I don't think we should roll into 2002.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Anastas, Sherry
Sent:   Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:06 AM
To:     Goodell, Scott
Subject:        New Contracts

Scott,

In reconciling imbalances with Somerset Gas Transmission Company, LLC, Volume Management has discovered two contracts that were assigned from CES.  If these are valid, we need to load beginning balances as of 12/31/99.

The contracts are as follows:

Contract
Number          Agent for               Type of Service Class           Rate Schedule   Beginning Balance

3005            Dannic Energy Corp      Gathering       Interruptible   I               5,425 mmbtu

3028            Thomas Leeper           Gathering       Interruptible   I               500 mmbtu

I will also need a transport capacity ticket set up.  Please let me know if we should set these contracts up of not.

Thanks,

Sherry Anastas


done.

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
09/11/2000 09:56 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal

Daren-
Thanks for completing Feb 2000 Cashout.
Could you also enter a Demand fee into Sitara for March and April 2000?

March 2000

Sales Ticket # 157278
$0.00 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$3,526.98 Dollars Due Duke

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:

Column H is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 24,452 mmbtus
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$0.00
Column U is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $3,526.98.

April 2000

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,507.56 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$1,549.82 Dollars Due Duke

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:

Column H is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 53,206 mmbtus
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,507.56
Column U is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $1,549.82

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on
09/11/2000 09:12 AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer@ECT
09/05/2000 11:25 AM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Done.

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
09/05/2000 10:14 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Daren,

I believe the best way to enter the fee into Sitara would be as a Demand fee
in your example #1.
If we do the fee this way, we will not  double up the volumes.

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:
THE MOST CURRENT WORKSHEET IS TAB #2 MARKED FINAL

Column G is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 17,278 mmbtus
Column S is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,008.87
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $519.73.

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

Daren J Farmer@ECT
08/31/2000 05:49 PM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Katherine,

There are 2 ways that I can enter this fee into Sitara:
1) I can put the dollar amount in on day 1 as a demand or facility fee.

2) I need you to give me volume(s) and a price to input into the deal.  I
can't just input a dollar amount in Sitara.

Let me know how you want to handle it.

D

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
08/31/2000 05:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

CASHOUT
Please add the following fees for Feb. 2000:

FEE TYPE:
Natural Gas
Physical Forward
Penalty for Over/ Under take

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,008.87 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$519.73 Dollars Due Duke

Thanks- Katherine


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 12:41 PM
---------------------------

"scott neal" <sneal12@mindspring.com> on 04/20/2001 08:37:28 PM
To: <Scott.Neal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

The Dow  topped out in February of 1966 at 995. By September of that year the
Dow had  tumbled to 744. The Dow then rallied to a high of 943 in September
of '67. By  March of '68 the Dow had fallen to 825, only to climb to a highly
speculative  peak of 985 in December of '68. The Dow then sank to 631 in
December of '70.

By April of '71 the Dow had climbed back to 950, only to fall to 869 in
February of '72. A big rally then took the Dow (unconfirmed) to a record high
of  1051 in January of '73, turning everyone bullish. But by December of '73
the Dow  had collapsed to 788. Think that was bad - by December of '74 the
Dow had sunk  to a bear market low of 577. At that time, the gurus and
geniuses of Wall Street  were predicting a 250 Dow and many were talking
openly about the end of  capitalism. Of course, that was the bottom

And that's  the way the greatest bear market since the Depression worked its
way down. By  late 1974 investors were dizzy, they were desperate, they were
wrung-out, they  had left Wall Street, many for  good.


how much does the league cost for softball


The attached letter is being sent to you from Patricia Gillman.

(See attached file: Sanders Letter 4_28_00.doc)

 - Sanders Letter 4_28_00.doc


Today is kind of bleak.  Tuesday is good should something change for you.

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 09/08/2000 04:25:33 PM
To: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>,
"'chris.booth@enron.com'" <chris.booth@enron.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Change Order #3

Lee, Chris and Kay:

Attached is a draft of the Change Order #3 for the Las Vegas Cogen project.
Kay, I will be in Houston on Monday through Wednesday afternoon, but will be
busy most of Tuesday.  Lee had hoped that we could get together, or at least
talk, about this and the facility agreement and payment for Change Order #2.
How is your late Monday afternoon looking?

Kent

 <<Amendment Number 3.doc>>


Excellent!  I hope Briden's project attracts fewer vultures than Dennis
Langley's.  I need to go to Midland on the afternoon of the 12th, so could
meet in Houston conveniently on the morning of the 12th or anytime 10 am or
later on the 11th.  I could meet on the 10 th after 10, but less
conveniently.  Just let Martha know what the plan is and she'll deploy me.
Also,  when you say they want TW to "build, own and operate the plant" you
mean the gas pipeline facilities, not the power plant, right?  Must be
because $20 mil. would be a pretty cheap power plant.  Thats a pretty cheap
pipeline also for the length--about 40 miles, right?  DF

Jeffery Fawcett
06/27/2000 04:17 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry
Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Rich
Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Caithness Big Sandy, LLC. Project

The project's consultant, George Briden, of Snake Hill Energy, called me
today to say that Caithness Corp. has decided to move forward with plans for
the Big Sandy, LLC. Project.  To refresh your memory, the project is a
proposed IPP to be located about 40 miles south of TW's pipeline along
Highway 93, about 2 miles outside of Wickieup, Arizona.  I've attached a
simple bitmap below (click on it and hit "view") indicating the location of
the project relative to Transwestern's facilities.  Ultimately, the project
would be built for approx. 1,000 MW of generation in two phases.  Phase 1
will burn approx. 80,000 Dth/d, and phase 2 will burn an additional 120,000
Dth/d.  Initial indications are for the project to be in service in early
2002, with the lateral pipeline and gas service required as early as Q2, 2001.

Caithness Corp., based in New York, is a privately held company with diverse
interests including geothermal (renewable) electric generation facilities
(Coso Plant) in California.  George reported that Caithness would like for
Transwestern to build, own and operate the plant with facility costs (current
estimate, $20.3MM) to be amortized vis-a-vis a throughput/rate commitment.
Caithness would also like the project to be interconnected to El Paso's
system and the Questar Southern Trails Pipeline if that project should ever
be completed.

Obviously, we'll have to wade throught the legal/regulatory issues
surrounding this deal structure, as well as the requisite credit assurances.
With respect to the former, I think if we view this pipeline
ownership/operation structure more as a financing mechanism with associated
operating agreements, then we're probably OK.  With respect to the later,
George assured me that Caithness can/will set-up a funding mechanism that
would give Transwestern sufficient assurance of payback.

George would like to bring down a couple of representatives from Caithness to
meet with Transwestern sometime the week of July 10.  He suggested either
Omaha or Houston for the meeting, inasmuch as he'd like Drew Fossum to be
present.

Drew, I'm thinking it might be easier/better to have the meeting here in
Houston given our immediate access to maps and engineering data regarding the
lateral pipeline.  If you concur, what day(s) do you have open that week and
is there an opportunity for you to hop Bill's plane for either one or both
legs of the trip down here?  I'll ask Ron Matthews and maybe one or two
others to join us so we can cover a fairly broad base of functions in one
sitting.

Will you get back with me as soon as you can?  Others on the distribution, if
you can sit tight we'll get you more information as this meeting date/time
comes together.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 07:12
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 01/24/2001 06:25:43 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: daily charts and matrices as hot links 1/24

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil13.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded13.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Stripmatrix13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


I'm on a call until about 10.  I'll come down and try to grab you and susan
and lets call MKM and get a plan.  df

Steven Harris
02/15/2001 08:49 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/Enron@EnronXGate, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Expansion

Drew, I think your last question is the one most critical to us at this
point. The marketers can go out and start selling the project but are having
a hard time defining how the capacity will be allocated. I left a message
yesterday for Mary K. regarding these same issues. Thanks.

Drew Fossum
02/14/2001 04:38 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Expansion

There were several questions left for legal/regulatory to work on at the
close of our meeting today.  I'll try to restate them, and add my initial
thoughts, so we can all be sure to focus on the correct problems.

Q 1. Can TW use "negotiated rate" agreements for its new 150 mm/d expansion?

A.  Yes.  Independence, Guardian, and other new pipeline projects were
certificated on the basis of negotiated rate contracts.  The only restriction
is that we need to always offer cost-based recourse rate service as an
alternative to negotiated rates.  We hope to use negotiated rate agreements
for the entire 150 mm of capacity, but we won't know until the contracts are
executed how much of it will be negotiated rate contracts and how much of it
will be under recourse rate contracts.  I guess that means that in the cert.
app., we just tell the commission that we will be 100% at risk and that given
the huge interest in the open season, we have no doubts about our ability to
sell the full 150.  We should also tell the Commission we expect to sell the
capacity using negotiated rate contracts or recourse rate contracts or a
combination of both.

Q 2.  Can we give prospective customers a "cafeteria style" menu of options
(to steal Jeff's term), like the following:
 1.  5 yr. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.60 plus fuel and surcharges (or
whatever number we decide on)
 2.  10 y. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.45 plus fuel and surcharges
 3.  15 yr. neg rate deal at a locked in $.35 blah blah
 4 .  15 yr cost based recourse rate plus fuel and surcharges (importantly
this option is not locked in and will float with TW's actual rate levels and
fuel retainage percentages)

A.  I think the answer here is "yes."  Whatever options we come up with for
1, 2, and 3, we will always have to offer 4 as well.  Susan and Steve
Stojic:  please confirm that we have the right to define specific negotiated
rate options and stick to them.  Otherwise, this negotiated rate approach
could get completely unstructured such that we end up with some guys taking
our specific options and other guys custom tailoring weird variations (like a
7 yr, 231 day contract at $.51764, for example).  I'm not sure that would be
a bad thing, but we need to think about it.  We need to be sure we can tell a
customer "no" and make it stick if he tries to mix and match by asking for
the 5 yr term and the $.35 rate, for example.  I think we can lay out options
of our choosing and then enforce a "no substitutions" policy (this is
sticking with the "cafeteria" theme) but we need to be sure.

Q.3.  If we can use the "cafeteria options" approach, how much flexibility do
we have in structuring the options?

A:  This one is hard.  We need to be sure that the price and term we choose
to offer for options 1-3 is solely within our discretion.  We don't want to
be second guessed by FERC as to whether we should have offered option 1 at
$.58 instead of $.60.  Susan and Steve: if you guys confirm that we have
discretion in how to structure our negotiated rate options, does that mean we
can slant the economics of the negotiated rate options so they are a better
deal than the recourse option (for most shippers)?  I.e., could we
deliberately  incent shippers to sign on for the short term deals--i.e., by
offering options 1-3 at $.55, $.45 and $.40 instead of the $.60, $.45, and
$.35 shown above.  I suspect that is what Guardian and the other pipes did to
obtain 100% subscription under neg. rate deals.

Q.4.  How do we allocate capacity to customers if demand exceeds supply???

A.  Ideally, we'd be able to allocate the 150 to the guys who want to buy it
the way we'd prefer to sell it.  Under the above example, assuming Stan,
Danny and Steve decide short term deals are better, what if we get 100 mm/d
of offers on each of the 4 rate/term options described above.  That's 400
mm/d of demand for a 150 mm/d project.  Can we sell 100 to the guys who want
option 1 ($.60/5 yrs) and the remaining 50 to the 10 yr/$.45 guys?  That
really hoses the recourse bidders.  Do we have to cover the recourse demand
first and then allocate the remaining capacity pro rata to everyone else?
Pro rata to everyone?  Under the rule that negotiated rate bids have to be
deemed to be at max rate for purposes of allocation, pro rata to everyone may
be the right answer.  Or at least its the answer until we've filled the
recourse rate guys' orders, then we can give the remaining capacity to the
neg. rate guys whose bids we value most highly (using some objective
nondiscriminatory calculation of course).   Ugh.

Susan and Steve--please take a crack at questions 2-4.  I think 1 is answered
already.  I haven't done any research yet, so maybe these questions are
easier than they currently seem to me.  Get me and MKM on the phone at your
convenience to discuss.  We've gotta move quick so the marketers can get out
and sell this stuff.  DF


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kenneth Shulklapper                           09/21/2000 10:20 AM

To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>,
"'Chad.Landry@enron.com'" <Chad.Landry@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Etiquette - rerun

NIce Man! Especially #10

Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:

> >  1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> >   2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> >   3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> >   saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> >   face.
> >
> >   4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> >   5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> >   6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> >   my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> >   additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> >   7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> >   to fart.
> >
> >   8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> >   week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> >   feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> >   to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> >   9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> >   on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> >   jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> >   10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> >   teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> >   11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> >   immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> >   would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> >   12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> >   to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> >   the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> >   rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> >   13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> >   care about the protein content.
> >
> >   14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> >   15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> >   don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> >   It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.


(For e-mailing list removal information see bottom of e-mail.) [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

	?
	Hear Major League Baseball Live in your RealPlayer

	From opening day to the pennant races, RealPlayer 8 Plus is a great way to
hear MLB games live on the Internet! You can't be a real fan without it!
	?
	Get it Now!
	?
	Your Online Box Seat to Major League Baseball

	?Download now and get audio broadcasts of MLB games.
	?Follow your favorite team at home or on the road.
	?Keep up with your fantasy players live, all season long.
	?
	RealPlayer Plus offers a full line-up of features

	In addition to MLB, you'll also get:
	?Amazing audio and video
	?Full-screen video (with an Intel Pentium IIIc processor)
	?Easy access to 2,500+ radio stations
	?
	[IMAGE]Get it all now!
?	?	?

You are receiving this e-mail because you downloaded RealPlayer(R) or
RealJukebox(R) from Real.com(TM) and indicated a preference to receive
product news, updates, and special offers from RealNetworks(R).  If you do
not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the Remove Me
link below.

Remove Me |  Privacy Policy

Real.com, RealPlayer, RealJukebox and RealNetworks are trademarks or
registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products
listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective
owners.


As most of you know, American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston to Los Angeles was hijacked yesterday and then crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York.  We are very sorry to report that we believe an Enron employee was on board that flight.   Nick Humber, a director in Enron Wind's commercial origination group, was listed on the flight's manifest, and although his family has not received official confirmation that he boarded the flight, they have been unable to contact him.  Nick was based in Boston and was traveling to Los Angeles for a meeting.  We have talked with Nick's family and offered our full support.  Please continue to keep Nick's family and everyone affected by this horrific event in your thoughts and prayers.


fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Boudreaux, Shanna
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Townsend, Judy; Germany, Chris; Lamadrid, Victor; Neal, Scott;
Versen, Victoria; Ordway, Chris
Subject: FW: TE Restriction for Oct 18-19

FYI...

October 18, 2001

An unplanned outage at the ATHENS (ATH) Ohio Compressor station has
occurred.  Due to high throughput levels already in the system and the
restriction at ATH, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (TE) will not be
accepting physical increases for Gas Day October 18, 2001 upstream of
ATH.  This would include the entire Access Area, Market Zone 1 30 Inch &
24 Inch, Market Zone 2 upstream of the ATH compressor station.  Due Pipe
makeup cannot be accepted for Gas Day October 19,2001.  These
restrictions may be extended through the weekend.   Meter operators are
reminded to flow at scheduled volumes.

Should you have any questions, please contact your Operations Account
Manager.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000 09:17
AM ---------------------------

Hap Boyd@ENRON
04/19/2000 10:28 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron Wind Policy Meeting

SK - I let Hap know that you will be attending.  mm

Steve,
I had sent you an email on a meeting to discuss Enron Wind's policy positions
and regulatory and legislative needs. The meeting will be held on Tuesday,
April 25 at 9:00 am in Kurt Huneke's conference room. Please let me know
whether or not you'll be able to attend. Thanks.
Hap


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042117.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   3.53)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012804.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


Your brother sold those tickets for me, so sorry, they are gone.  Hey, I am
meeting them in Atlanta and the Jocks adn Jills sports bar in CNN Center
before the game.  Please come join us.  I will arrive about 11:30 a.m.  Talk
to you soon.  WAR DAMN EAGLE!!
PL


Richard Shapiro
	02/21/2001 04:50 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California

Please distribute to entire group - recent talking points and proposals re:
California .
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/16/2001 08:49 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@mail.acom2.com> @ ENRON, Scott Govenar
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, BTC <BCragg@GMSSR.com>
cc:

Subject: Ken Lay's email to Sen. Brulte

Greetings All:

First, I am apologizing in advance for any typos in this email.  Schedule is
very tight, but I wanted to make sure that everyone had it first thing this
morning, with some back-up info that I've included below.

Attached is the email that was sent to Ken Lay's office yesterday evening for
delivery to Sen. Brulte.  It's of course confidential.  Few points:

I don't have Bev's email, so if you could please forward to her, that would
be appreciated.
As we discussed (Jim, Mike, Bev, Scott, Hedy) on our lengthy call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that the plan is still to "wallpaper" Sacramento with
our proposed legislation.
This email does not contain the legislation.  Mike sent the "final" versions
of our legislation out yesterday, except for the siting piece, which I
believe Brian Cragg of Mike's office is finalizing today.
You'll note that we promise Senator Brulte in the email that we'll deliver to
his office today the proposed legislation.  Again, based on our call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that we would simultaneously release the proposed
legislation to the rest of the world at the same time.
When we spoke on Wednesday, we decided that the Sacramento team would
determine to whom we would circulate the proposed legislation at the same
time that we deliver the Senator Brulte. I'm assuming that you folks will
handle that end of things.  Please let us know at your convenience to whom
you've decided to circulate.
This email does, however, include a "summary" of our proposed legislation.
But I'm not certain that the summary included in this email is the
appropriate language to distribute "to the world," or if we'll need instead
to tailor some new language.  I think we all agreed that we need a "one
pager" to accompany the legislative package so that we can communicate the
package effectively.
We also discussed the need to quickly develop a coalition to support our
proposals.  We didn't finalize that plan.  Perhaps the Sacramento team could
propose a plan to do that.  Perhaps we could start with our friends in the
Direct Access coalition?
We also talked about the need at this point to engage in PR and to get the PR
machinery activated, also with the goal of effectively communicating our
legislative package/message.  We're in a meeting with folks today where we
can discuss getting that side of things going and Karen Denne has contacted
Marathon and they're pondering some things that we can do in the near term.
You'll note that there's a considerable amount of information about the DWR
credit issue.  As I recollect, we discussed the issue in depth on the call.
You note that attached to the email is a "legislative fix" to AB1X that could
solve the credit issue and an attached set of "taking points" related to a
second alternative to solving the credit issue:  a PUC order clarifying that
DWR will get its money for power purchase costs.
Note also that Steve Kean reminded me that we've got to continue to push to
get the utilities out of the merchant function.  Accordingly, I've put a
brief paragraph on that issue in the note to Brulte in the last section
(legislative solution) under the topic "create a real competitive retail
market in California."  To the best of my knowledge, we don't have
legislative language on that piece yet, and it seems that we'll need to
discuss it in considerably more depth before doing so.

If you have any questions about any of the materials in the email, please
don't hesitate to contact me or Jim or Sandi to discuss.  I can be best
reached to day by pager at 888.916.7184.

Thanks to all for helping pull this together.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 08:27 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve:
Here's a substantially more cleaned-version, with attachments.  There's a
hard copy on your chair.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 05:57 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office tomorrow detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will
also identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our
proposed language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001 04:35 PM -----

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	03/12/2001 04:22 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: can you please look over

I've just omitted the offensive language on the lines....

i need to get something back to them.....thanks,
ca


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
01/04/2001 04:43 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Praveen
Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane
Green/HOU/EES@EES, Seksan Kiatsupaibul/HOU/EES@EES, Nelson
Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Research Group Party on January 6, 2001

Please let me know by 2:00 PM tomorrow whether you are coming to the Research
Group Party on Saturday.  Also,if you are attending,  what food item will you
bring and how many adults and children will be attending.  I need to know
final numbers so I can buy the paper goods, drinks, etc. that are being
furnished for the party.

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 01/04/2001 04:26
PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont
01/02/2001 03:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yana
Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li
Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman
Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann
Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Seksan
Kiatsupaibul/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson
Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Research Group Party on January 6, 2001

Hope you can join us.

Regards,
Anita


FYI.  I think that the press on Gov. Davis is a bit misleading.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 11:05 AM -----

	Mike D Smith@EES
	03/21/2001 09:35 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY
EFFICIENT BUILDINGS -- EES Wins $1.5 million

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 03/21/2001 09:35
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Andrew Wu                           03/21/2001 09:19 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-0504

To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY
EFFICIENT BUILDINGS -- EES Wins $1.5 million

Vicki and Mike--

It is true that the CEC "awarded" us a contract for $1.5MM of grants under
the AB970 program.  I use quotes around the award because we had responded
only to an RFQ, not an RFP, so the issuance of the "award" based only on an
RFQ was unusual (perhaps due to urgency of program).  As the RFQ didn't
include any terms and conditions, after the "award", we started negotiating
the terms and conditions of the contract.  We have been hung up on
consequential damages and indemnities, so on March 12 I prepared a mini-TAF
covering these issues for executive approval.  George Hernandez' assistant
picked up the mini-TAF on March 13.  I haven't seen it since and so I don't
know whether the mini-TAF was fully signed or not.  George is out of the
office and I have just left his assistant a message.  I am hopeful that no
one has signed the actual contract pending approval of the mini-TAF.

If I can track down the status of the mini-TAF I'll re-send an email with
status.

AW

Vicki Sharp
03/20/2001 11:28 PM
To: Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY EFFICIENT
BUILDINGS -- EES Wins $1.5 million

Did we sign these contracts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 03/20/2001 10:44
PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/20/2001 03:46 PM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, gfergus@brobeck.com, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ren, Lazure/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, jklauber@llgm.com, Tamara
Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, James Wright/Western Region/The
Bentley Company@Exchange, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
psmith3@enron.com, mjackso7@enron.com, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY EFFICIENT
BUILDINGS -- EES Wins $1.5 million

EES is listed as receiving $1.5 million for 7.5 MWs of reduction

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 01:45 PM -----

	"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
	03/20/2001 01:19 PM

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<anchau@shellus.com>, "Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
"Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail)" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "'Michael Nelson' (E-mail)"
<mnelson@electric.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>,
"Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "'Robert
Morgan' (E-mail)" <rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
arm@phaser.com, "brbarkovich@earthlink.net" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net'>,
cra@calretailers.com, dennis.flatt@kp.org, dhunter@smithandkempton.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com,
drothrock@cmta.net, gharrison@calstate.edu, hgovenar@govadv.com,
jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com, kgough@calpine.com,
kmccrea@sablaw.com, kmills@cfbf.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com, mday@gmssr.com,
mmoretti@calhealth.org, nplotkin@tfglobby.com, randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com,
richard.seguin@kp.org, RochmanM@spurr.org, rrichter@calhealth.org,
sgovenar@govadv.com, smccubbi@enron.com, spahnn@hnks.com, theo@ppallc.com,
vincent.stewart@ucop.edu, vjw@ceert.org, "Warner, Jami"
<jami.warner@edelman.com>, wbooth@booth-law.com, wbrown@lhom.com,
wlarson@calstate.edu
		 cc:
		 Subject: Press Release: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR
ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS

Megan Beiser
Assistant Account Executive
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
Phone: (916) 442-2331
Fax: (916) 447-8509

> PR01:104
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> 03/20/2001 01:30 PM
>
>
> GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY EFFICIENT
> BUILDINGS 03/20/2001
>
> SACRAMENTO
>
> Governor Gray Davis today announced that the California Energy Commission
> has signed 12 grants and contracts totaling almost $9.2 million to install
> "energy smart" technology in commercial and industrial buildings
> throughout the state.
>
> "Our campaign for conservation and improved energy efficiency will
> translate into real reductions in the summer when we need it most - and
> beyond," Governor Davis said. "With these grants in place, California will
> continue to set the national standard for energy efficiency."
>
> The agreements signed by Governor Davis will account for about 93
> megawatts of projected savings from buildings outfitted with demand
> responsive building systems technology. Demand responsive building systems
> work by using software that automatically dim lights, reduce air
> conditioning use, and cut other electrical loads. They operate in response
> to signals from the Independent System Operator (ISO) or from an electric
> utility or service provider.
>
> Under the agreements, commercial electricity customers will agree to shave
> peak loads by 10 to 30 percent upon receiving the signal from the ISO.
> They will be paid by the ISO to curtail electricity load in their
> buildings in real time.
>
> In addition to these grants, the Governor also announced that an
> additional eight megawatts of electricity would be saved through grants to
> the K-Mart Corporation. K-Mart will use a $2 million grant to replace old
> lighting fixtures with energy efficient ones in its 85 California stores.
>
> The demand responsive program and the innovative efficiency and renewables
> program covering the K-Mart grant are parts of AB 970, which was passed
> last year. The bill is designed to reduce at least 220 megawatts of peak
> load by June 1, 2001.
>
> The Governor has proposed an additional $70 million in his New Demand
> Reduction Initiative program that would yield an additional 160 megawatts
> in savings from demand responsive building systems.
>
> For more information, please contact the California Energy Commission.
>
> Demand Responsive Contracts:
> 1. Sacramento Municipal Utility District, $882,750, target savings: 10
> megawatts
> 2. Roseville Electric, $956,000, target savings: 10 megawatts
> 3. Pacific Gas and Electric, $1,411,026, target savings: 35 megawatts
> 4. Seiben Energy Associates, $340,245, target savings: 1.3 megawatts
> 5. Apogee Interactive, Inc., $422,915, target savings: 5 megawatts
> 6. Enron Energy Services Op. Inc. , $1,500,000, target savings: 7.5
> megawatts
> 7. San Diego Regional Energy Office, $1,085,476, target savings: 3.125
> megawatts
> 8. Global Energy Partner, LLC, $1,540,000, target savings: 15 megawatts
>
> Grants:
> 1. Cisco Systems, $40,460, target savings: 1.2 megawatts
> 2. Alameda County, $260,964, target savings: 1.2 megawatts
> 3. Hewlett Packard, $445,693, target savings: 1.8 megawatts
> 4. Foothill College District-De Anza, $283,140, target savings: 1.3
>
>
>
> Megan Beiser
> Assistant Account Executive
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
> Phone: (916) 442-2331
> Fax: (916) 447-8509
>


Hallo together,

attached is the first overview of the SQL interface.

At the moment I only use the data from the files in the "ParkData" directory.

If we change the plant version, we can use further data.

Please, check the field assignment.

Best regards,

Clemens W"ste

ENRON Wind


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

"Laura Ide" <lide@riskwaters.com> on 12/22/2000 11:54:31 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Energy & Power Risk Management 2001

Dear Vince,

I would like to confirm the invitation for you to participate at our annual
congress in Houston. Following our conversation, I would be most interested
in  including a presentation on 'Modeling price volatility in US power
markets'  in the pricing, hedging & trading stream on the 14th May,  2001.

I am keen to confirm each speaker and session by the end of next week, which
will then allow time to work with each presenter on titles and points that
will  provide an accurate summary for the session.

If you have any overall views or suggestions regarding the conference feel
free to email me at pbristow@riskwaters.com or call me on  212 925 6990,
extn. 225. I look forward to confirming your participation at  Energy & Power
Risk Management 2001. IMPORTANT: Due to system problems I am  using another
system. Please do not reply to this email. Please reply to the  address given
above.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Bristow

Manager of Conferences, USA

Risk Waters Group
 - spktemp2.doc


I made changes to  (h) Sections 8.1 (c) and 8.2 (c) changing the days for
providing Performance Assurance form 3 to 10. I also changed (i) "Downgrade
Event "  to 10 days to make it consistent with (j).

 <<SMUD Redline EEI (5.15.01).doc>>

 - SMUD Redline EEI (5.15.01).doc


I recognize that Aug 17 is Jason Garvey's last day, I am fine with that date.


I think I better stick around my new job for a little longer before I run
off.  I've got a training class again next week so I'm going to be out 2 days.

I think I'm going to Austin in late Feb for the internship interviews.


FOLLOW ME TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!!

I Am looking for people with good work ethics and extrordinary desire to earn at least $10,000 per month working from home!

NO SPECIAL SKILLS OR EXPERIENCE REQUIRED. We will give you all the training and personal support you will need to ensure your success!

This LEGITIMATE HOME-BASED INCOME OPPORTUNITY can put you back in control of your time, your finances, and your life!

If you've tried other opportunities in the past that have failed to live up their promises, THIS IS DIFFERENT THEN ANYTHING ELSE YOU'VE SEEN!

THIS IS NOT A GET RICH QUICK SCHEME!

YOUR FINANCIAL PAST DOES NOT HAVE TO BE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE!

CALL ONLY IF YOU ARE SERIOUS!

1-800-533-9351 (Free, 2 minute message)

DO NOT RESPOND BY EMAIL AND DON'T GO TO SLEEP WITHOUT LISTENING TO THIS!

" The moment you commit an quit holding back, all sorts of unforseen incidents, meetings and material assistance will
rise up to help you. The simple act of commitment is a powerful magnet for help." - Napoleon Hill

To be REMOVED from this list, simply click reply and submit.


I received an email this morning regarding the reports viewer.  I agree with
restriciting the access to these sensitive reports, but I don't agree with
removing myself from those allowed to review positions.  I not only run one
of the largest financial books on the floor, but I also manage the West
physical book.  Phillip Allen passed on the IM WEST physical book to me two
months ago.  While Phillip acts as manager of the sub books in the west, I am
managing all physical positions.

Mike Grigsby


My name is Ramesh Rao and I work for Beth Perlman in Net Works.  Based on the email below, I'd like to get with each of you to discuss the FY 02 budget for my team and get your feedback.  As a first step, I will set up a meeting or a conference call with each of you shortly.

My team supports the mid-back office for Gas and Power i.e. Unify, DCAF 2, TAGG Confirmations and EnPower Confirmations.  Unify is used by Gas for Logistics, Vol. Management, and Settlements.  It is used by Power for Settlements.  Unify also supports Financial Gas and Power, which is used in Houston, Calgary and London.  Confirmations are handled by DCAF 2, TAGG Confirmations or EnPower Confirmations as the case may be.

Since your teams use one or all of these applications, you share the costs.  I can meet with each of you (or your representative) individually or meet with everyone as a group.  Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

Thanks,

Ramesh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Perlman, Beth; Beck, Sally; Pickering, Mark; Piper, Greg
Cc:	Storey, Geoff; Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Will, Lloyd; Gaskill, Chris; Milnthorp, Rob; Luce, Laura; Haedicke, Mark E.; Greenberg, Mark; Colwell, Wes; Killen, Faith
Subject:	New Start

We have unsuccessfully attempted to find sponsors for the project list you gave to me in our meeting.  I would therefore like to start the game again but starting from zero and working our way up. Assuming we are starting with no budget for IT development, please could you sit down with each of our Business Sponsors and agree a number with them.  They are:

Tim Belden (or his appointed person) for West Power
Lloyd Will for East Power
Geof Storey for Gas
Laura Luce for Peoples and Global Net
Chris Gaskill for Gas Fundys
Rob Milnthorp (or his appointed person) for Canada.
Mark Haedicke/Greenberg (or his appointed person) for Legal.

Each of the above will be allocated their charge for IT development and capital (apart from Geof who will allocate across the desks) and therefore is the best person/people to decide on the costs.  Please could you arrange a short meeting/discussion with each and agree a budget as the process so far is not working.

I am assuming its zero at the moment.

Thanks

Louise