I approve.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 11:24 AM -----

	Elizabeth Linnell
	Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
	09/20/2000 10:51 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Flatscreens approval

Steve - Please forward to Eileen Buerkert with your approval.

Eileen - Per our discussion, please make sure these are the black
flatscreens.

Thanks!

----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 10:50 AM -----

	Eileen Buerkert
	09/08/2000 12:01 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Enron IT Purchasing@Enron, Hank Zhang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Ruff/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andy Sikes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PO Approval needed

Elizabeth,

Because of the dollar amount of this PO, I need to have an email approval
from your senior director.  Could you forward this to the appropriate party
(if it's not you) and have him/her email me back with a note saying
"approved" on it?  I will fax this immediately after I receive that.  Thank
you!!

Eileen Buerkert
IT Sourcing and Procurement
713-345-6272
----- Forwarded by Eileen Buerkert/NA/Enron on 09/08/2000 12:00 PM -----

PURCHASE ORDER FORM
	PO No. 20090208
	Master Request:

Order Date:	09/08/2000
WO #:
CO #:	0011		SAP Cost Center #:	100062
Ordered By:	Eileen Buerkert		Phone #:	713 345-6272
Vendor:	COMPAQ DIRECT		Fax #:	317-228-8780
Contact:	TAMMY RAY		Phone #:	800-535-2563
Date Required:
Payment Terms:				NET 30 DAYS
FOB Point:
Ship To:	ENRON CORP
PO # 20090208
1400 SMITH ROOM 523
HOUSTON  TX 77002
ATTN:	LYN MALINA
713 853-1840			Note:
				Please include all ship to information on any packages.
				We will not accept packages without an ENRON PO#.
Bill To:	ENRON CORP
P O BOX 3767
HOUSTON  TX 77253
ATTN:	FELICIA SALEWSKY
713 853-3895

Quantity Ordered:
	Item Number:
		Description:
			Mfgr:   	Unit    Price:
					Price:
14	104741-001	15IN TFT 5010 OPAL	COMPAQ	$922.00
					$12908.00

			Amount:		$12908.00
	Local Sales Tax Applies?      		Sales Tax (8.25%):		$1064.91
			Total:		$13972.91

Notes:	PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS PO BY SIGNING AND FAXING TO Eileen
Buerkert @ 713 646-2450

ENRON CORP	COMPAQ DIRECT

Revision History:	Eileen Buerkert	09/08/2000 12:00:29 PM


I'm calling in (conference call) for this one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/12/2001 01:00
PM ---------------------------

Mark Bernstein@EES
03/12/2001 11:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Co-Op City Meetings

FYI for the conf. call.

thanks,

Mark
3-7516
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES on 03/12/2001
11:30 AM ---------------------------

"Henneberry, Lisa G." <LHenneberry@ssd.com> on 03/12/2001 10:27:25 AM
To: "'mahonl@pbworld.com'" <mahonl@pbworld.com>, "'losi@pbworld.com'"
<losi@pbworld.com>, "'mesko@pbworld.com'" <mesko@pbworld.com>,
"'axz@dmlegal.com'" <axz@dmlegal.com>, "'mdc@dmlegal.com'"
<mdc@dmlegal.com>, "'mark.bernstein@enron.com'"  <mark.bernstein@enron.com>
cc: "Ragals, Jr., William C." <WRagals@SSD.COM>, "White, Robert I."
<RWhite@ssd.com>
Subject: Co-Op City Meetings

This e-mail is to confirm our meeting on Wednesday, March 14 at 9:00 a.m. at
the Squire Sanders offices in New York City.  The address is as follows:

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey
350 Park Avenue
15th Floor
New York, New York
Tel - 212-872-9800
Fax - 212-872-9815

Breakfeast and lunch have been ordered for Wednesday.  I look forward to
seeing you there.

Lisa G. Henneberry
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
(Tel)  202-626-6640
(Fax) 202-626-6780
LHenneberry@ssd.com
www.ssd.com <http://www.ssd.com>


Bodie.  I like Bodie.  Here Bodie, you a goooood booy Bodie.  I'M NOT
KIDDING!!!!

I'd go with Bubba, but that's what we call our cat.


Elizabeth,

 Per your request, I have prepared the following summary.

Western RTO Development:

RTO West.
Area to be included -- WA, OR, ID, MT, Western WY, UT, NV-North & South and
hopefully Canada (BC Hydro and possibly Alberta)
Filed with FERC "Stage 1" documents in October 2000 -- Governance, Bylaws,
Draft of Operating Agreement, etc.
Stage 2 development begun January 2001 with of complete proposal in July 2001
Earliest practical operation Fall 2002 (optimistic based on quick on approval
time)
Plan Quality -- Good overall
Attractive Features -- independent board, single control area and real time
voluntary energy market, all parties on same tariff, a tradeable transmission
right with "use or lose" anti-hoarding provisions.
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users for a ten year period ("use or lose" will mitigate for short
term rights but long term rights on existing system will be tough to get).
Desert STAR.
Area to be included -- AZ, NM, CO, Eastern WY
Governance established and Board has been organized.
Have not yet filed a complete plan
Earliest practical operation Winter 2002 or beyond, depending on when they
actually file their proposal
Plan quality --  Potentially promising
Attractive Features -- similar transmission right regime as RTO West
Unknown -- whether they will have a single control area, whether
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users, board selection committee was manipulated by publics (however
in practice the independent board selected seems to have been little affected
by the search firm nomination process)
CA-ISO.
Area included -- CA IOU's only
Fully operational but with CA/FERC jurisdictional struggle over Board
appointment and independence.
Modifications to meet Order 2000 have been filed which appear to move
transmission rights close to the proposals under discussion in RTO West and
Desert STAR

Cooperative Regional Organization Activity:

Seams.
A joint task force of parties involved in RTO West, Desert STAR and CA-ISO
began meeting in November 2000
Three major seams issues identified and work begun
Scheduling time lines -- aligning processes between three RTOs so that
business across seams boundaries is not hampered for administrative reasons.
Nature of transmission rights and effect on loop flow -- making the
congestion management systems work between the three RTOs.
Export fees -- goal is to eliminate pancaking of fixed cost charges between
RTOs, perhaps by annual transfer payments between RTOs or some other
reciprocity agreement.
RTG Consolidation.
WRTA. SWRTA and WSCC voted to merge in to a single organization, the WIO
(Western Interconnection Organization)
WIO will have three committee:   Planning, Operations, Market Interface.
The Northwest organization (NRTA) has decided to stay independent for now,
but if RTO West forms it may just disappear as a separate organization.

If you need more detail, please let me know.

Steve

	Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
	01/26/2001 12:24 PM

		 To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info

Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California.  Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information.  I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well.  Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!

Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California.  Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.

Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated.  Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were.  What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?

Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.

Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.

Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX.  Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean.  Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.

Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.

Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal.  Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.

Thanks for your help!


tb + 9.5 for 250


I agree.   I told Gary you could make the call.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Form 144: Filing to Sell 32000 Shares of BEST BUY INC (BBY)

********************************
WATCH A PRO TRADE IN REAL TIME

AmericaInvest.com chief technical analyst Harry Boxer
has averaged returns of 2.5% PER DAY in the last 30 days.

See what Harry's trading tick by tick in his real-time
'Technical Trading Diary.'  Beat the bear market with
with both long and short trading ideas.

Sign up for our FREE 15-day trial at
http://216.133.228.197/harry/harryorderpage2.asp?MID=50009

********************************

View complete article at: http://news.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=BBY&article=61725210

BEST BUY CO INC  54.000

Jun 01, 2001 (Vickers Stock Research via COMTEX) --

<bs>Report Date: June 01, 2001

<bs>Filer: SCHEIDERER, CHARLES
<bs>Relation:

<bs>Stock Name: BEST BUY INC
<bs>Stock CUSIP: 086516101

<bs>Stock Symbol: BBY
<bs>Exchange: NYSE

<bs>Trade date: May 21, 2001
<bs>Shares for sale: 32000

Other Companies Involved:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

? Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


ANR/ML7-GDM
PL


Jim,

No changes in the schedule. The meeting will take place, as scheduled,
on the 6th of December at 9:00 a.m. We may have to cancel lunch with the
professors as they have other commitments. The meeting will last
about 2 hours.

Vince


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Team Leader Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		1/9/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


The EES VaR for today is $3.7 million, down slightly from yesterday's VaR of
$3.9 million.


eSource presents SDC Platinum training

SDC Platinum offers detailed transactional information on New Issues, Mergers
& Acquisitions, Syndicated Loans, Private Equity, Strategic Alliances,
Project Finance and others.  The product is designed to allow users to
compare transactions, evaluate advisors, and analyze market and industry
trends.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Basic query techniques for new issues and M&A databases.
? Basic query techniques for trend analysis.

Attend our SDC Platinum Clinic:

May 30     9:00 -11:30 AM   EB552

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


I got it to open.  That was funny!
Here are the pics from liz.

 - after01.jpg
 - before01.jpg
 - cad bar01.jpg
 - reunion02.jpg
 - reunion03.jpg
 - reunion04.jpg
 - reunion05.jpg
 - reunion08.jpg
 - reunion10.jpg
 - reunion11.jpg
 - reunion12.jpg
 - reunion13.jpg
 - reunion18.jpg


Please note the Change:
    ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting -July 7

As we move into the Spring/Summer of 2000, it is time to turn our attention
to the performance review process.  Mid-year is always busy and we have a
number of important tasks and projects in process.  While recognizing this,
it remains extremely important to take time over the next few weeks to gather
necessary information to provide quality and meaningful feedback for our
employees, as well as utilize this information during the year end review
process.

In the spirit of One Enron, the Performance Review Process (PRC) will be
global for Mid-year 2000.  Vice Presidents and above across all operating
companies will be reviewed and discussed in a consistent manner with
identical criteria.   ENA will review all professional level and above
employees.  The timeline and training for the midyear process are outlined at
the end of this memo.  Your HR Business Consultant is also available to
answer questions.

With regards to the Global Functions, review sessions will be led by the
Global and/or Corporate Functional heads, and will be designed to calibrate
personnel within these areas of expertise.  The Global Functional Review
Areas include:

_ NetWorks/Technology
_ Accounting
_ RAC
_ Finance
_ Human Resources
_ Public Relations & Reg Affairs	G. Whalley
	R. Causey
	R.  Buy
	A. Fastow
	C. Olson
	S. Kean

ENA Mid-Year Process:

ENA has received favorable feedback on the review process used for Mid-year
and Year-end 1999, and as such, will follow the same general guidelines and
process for Mid-year 2000.  The following are key features of the Mid-year
2000 process:

o The focus of the feedback will continue to be on the qualitative aspects,
as opposed to quantitative.  Toward this end, communication of the employee,s
explicit ranking will be left to the discretion of the business unit manager.
o Initial discussions with employees regarding their accomplishments, are
highly encouraged, prior to the Business Review Meetings.
o Mid-year performance results will be used as baseline performance
information for Year-end 2000.
o Creation of 3 standard feedback forms for all peer groups.
o Standardization of criteria for all peer groups.
o   Utilization of a consistent 6 gradation rating scale.
o All exempt employees will be discussed at Business Review Meetings and
placed into one of six categories by peer group.  ENA VP's will be pre-ranked
by the ENA Office of the Chairman and Managing Directors prior to the Enron
PRC.  Non-exempt (overtime eligible) employees will be evaluated by their
supervisors and placed into one of the 6 categories.  The results of the
Business Review Meetings will be the final rankings for exempt employees
below VP, subject to ENA Office of the Chairman.
o A minimum of two representatives from other functional areas will be
required at the Business Review Meetings.  The meetings should otherwise be
rescheduled to allow this very important representation to take place.  The
nominated individuals are illustrated below.
o The top 5 HR priorities/challenges for 2000 should also be agreed to at the
Business Review Meetings.
o Analysts and Associates will be pre-reviewed in a Business Review Meetings
based on their current rotation, then cross-calibrated at the Enron Global
Analyst and Associate Business Review Meeting.

Peer Groups:

 Commercial
 Commercial Support
 Technical
 Specialized Technical

Performance Criteria (for all peer groups):

Innovation/Entrepreneurship
Communication/Setting Direction
Teamwork/Interpersonal
Leadership/Vision/Values
Business Instinct
Analytical/Technical

Guidelines:

o Use of multiple sources of input is encouraged (employee, peers, direct
reports, internal customers, external customers), as is a self-evaluation
o Employees should recommend 5-10 reviewers to Supervisor and Supervisor
should select at least three of the employee,s recommendations
o All feedback must be entered via the Performance Management System located
on the intranet
o Supervisor should consolidate the feedback, prepare a draft of the
Performance Review form and meet with the employee prior to the Business
Review meeting
o Final feedback to exempt employee follows the July 7th meeting
o For VP's & MD's, final feedback follows the Enron Executive Committee
Meeting

Business Review Meetings / VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting
Responsibilities / Actions:

The following list represents suggested groups and the individuals
responsible for each Business Review Meeting.  Attendees at the meetings are
appropriate Supervisors within the Business Unit.  In addition, the Office of
the Chairman requires the attendance of two to three other senior level
representatives from other Business Units to add external perspective.

Area/Function	ENA Lead	Global/Functional Lead*	Required Non-functional  Attendees

COMMERCIAL

Trading	Presto		Dietrich
	Shankman		Calger
	Lavorato		Bowen
	McClellan		Ajello
	Hickerson		Delainey
	Belden

Origination	Redmond		Shankman
	Dietrich		McClellan
	Milnthorp		Belden
	Calger		Presto
	Donahue		Delainey
	Bowen		Lavorato
	Ajello
	Duran
	Ondarza
	Malcolm
	Overdyke
	Thompson/Josey
	Yzaguirre

Finance(*)	Jakubik	Fastow

COMMERCIAL SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL

Legal	Haedicke
Research	Kaminski
RAC	Buy
Technical	Miller/Parquet

Energy Operations (*)	Beck	Causey	Colwell
			Oxley

Business Analysis & Reporting/Tax (*)	Colwell	Causey	Beck
	Mintz

Human Resources (*)	Oxley	Olson

Public Relations (*)	Palmer	Kean

NetWorks/Technology (*)	Perlman	Whalley/McConnell

(*) Note:  Global Functional Review meetings to be held for these areas.

ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee:

Ray Bowen	Mark Frevert	Dan Leff (non ENA rep)	David Oxley
Dave Delainey	Brian Redmond	George McClellan	Mark Haedicke
Janet Dietrich	Julia Murray	Jeff Shankman	Gary Hickerson
Jeff Donahue	Jere Overdyke	Marty Sunde (non ENA rep)	John Lavorato

Outcomes of Business Review Meetings/ VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meetings:

o Calibration of employees into six gradations
o Promotion nominations below VP
o Assessment of  the &right people in the right jobs8
o Assessment of gaps for what is needed in the Business Unit (skills,
capabilities, training,
 experience)
o Top five HR challenges
o Feedback to employees on the results of the meetings, as applicable

Timeline
EP System Open for Feedback    May 17
PEP System Closes for Feedback    June 9
Feedback Collection/Initial Employee    May 17-June 12
 Discussions
Global Functional Review Meetings   June 12-June 16
ENA Business Review Meetings    June 12-July 25
ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting  July 7
Enron Executive Committee meeting   July 31-Aug. 1


Ditto Credit.

Thanks,

Shari


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
 PLEASE  VISIT OUR SPONSORS:
To empower parents in the event of an emergency, we are giving away 100,000 FREE Child ID Kits. The ID Kit allows you to have current details of your children on file in your home. CLICK HERE.

  Dear Dutch Quigley,   NCAA Football Odds  Tomorrow  FAVORITE           OPEN     TODAY    O/U      UNDERDOG  at Fresno St.       17       14 1/2 (60)      Boise St.   Saturday  at Clemson           7 1/2    6 1/2 (53 1/2 ) North Carolina at Georgia Tech     14       12     (52 1/2 ) N.C. State at Syracuse         19       16               Temple at Boston College   10       10     (50)      Pittsburgh at Northwestern     12       11     (48 1/2 ) Penn St. Michigan St.         4 1/2    3               at Minnesota at Illinois          3 1/2    5               Wisconsin LSU                  2 1/2    2 1/2 (45 1/2 ) at Mississippi St. at Georgia          23       22 1/2           Kentucky at Mississippi      14       12               Middle Tenn. at Kent St.         10       11 1/2           Buffalo Toledo              21       23 1/2           at Ball St. at Iowa St.          8        8 1/2           Oklahoma St. at Auburn           14       13 1/2           Louisiana Tech at Kansas            2        1               Missouri at Iowa             10 1/2    9 1/2 (56)      Indiana W. Michigan          9        8               at N. Illinois at Notre Dame       Pk       Pk     (42)      Southern Cal at Ohio              5 1/2    6 1/2           Miami (Ohio) Hawaii               6        7               at Tulsa at BYU              13       12 1/2 (59)      Air Force at TCU              17 1/2   13 1/2           Army at Oklahoma         35 1/2   35 1/2           Baylor at Utah             15 1/2   17 1/2 (52)      Wyoming Tennessee            1        1 1/2 (45)      at Alabama at Oregon            7 1/2    7 1/2 (61)      Stanford at Kansas St.      OFF      OFF               Texas A? at Washington       14       14 1/2 (50 1/2 ) Arizona at East Carolina    10 1/2   10               Memphis at Texas            11       10     (51)      Colorado at Rutgers           1        1               Navy at Idaho            11 1/2   11               La.-Lafayette at Marshall         23       23 1/2           Cent. Michigan at UCF              30       31 1/2           Louisiana-Monroe at North Texas       4 1/2    6               Arkansas St. at UAB              10 1/2   10 1/2           Tulane Bowling Green        2 1/2    5               at Akron at Arizona St.       1        1               Oregon St. at Maryland         23 1/2   25               Duke at Nebraska         25       24               Texas Tech at South Carolina   18 1/2   16 1/2           Vanderbilt Florida St.         11       11 1/2 (52 1/2 ) at Virginia Cincinnati          11       11 1/2           at Houston at Rice             13       13     (50 1/2 ) Nevada at UTEP              1        3               San Jose St. at UCLA             28       30               California at Ohio St.         23       22               San Diego St. at UNLV              4        4               Colorado St.

  ---COOL  NEW REMINDERS---Great Quotes of the DayTravel DigestPet Tips ---FAVORITE  REMINDERS---Entertainment NewsChildren's Product RecallsU.S. Market Indicies  Receive a weekly e-mail with the latest line on NCAA Division I basketball games. CLICK HERE.

To  unsubscribe from this Reminder topic, click  here.
To unsubscribe  from SmartReminders altogether, click  here.
[IMAGE]


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/10/2001>, published as of 10/10/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Steve, I just completed the MBA for Executives at Rice.  If I can help you in
any way, please let me know.  Regards, Kyle

---------------------- Forwarded by Kyle Roblee/HOU/EES on 06/02/2000 09:44
AM ---------------------------
 Office of the Chairman
From: Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 06/01/2000 05:27 PM
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Associate & Analyst Programs (Enron-wide email)

Please click on the below link to access a message from the Office of the
Chairman.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/otc1.doc


The ever changing world of Enron

John Lavorato would like to speak to you today.  So Please come to a meeting at 2:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 1:48 PM
To:	Reeves, Leslie; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Keiser, Kam; Theriot, Kim S.; Baxter, Bryce; Wynne, Rita; Aucoin, Evelyn; Allen, Thresa A.; Mcclure, Mark; Miroballi, Angelo; Love, Phillip M.; Valdes, John; Severson, Russ; Dhont, Margaret; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Giron, Darron C.; Couch, Greg; McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	Netco meeting today

I know we have moved this meeting already, but since I have very little info ( only what I read on Yahoo!)
I think we should wait till next week to meet.  So I am going to cancel.

I have given Leslie, Jeff , Stacey and Rita,  Enron BUCKS cards.  Make them buy you a drink.

Let me know if you hear anything.

Thanks for you patients and continued understanding.

bob


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Possibly. And just for your information, I think that request was actually
three sentences crammed into one, with a misspelling thrown in for good
measure. Nice.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           01/12/2001 02:27 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Hey a few of us are going to grab some drinks after work wanna come?


Please include Bill Bradford if possible. Tx Rick


Tana, Kelly, Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type:

	US East Power Phy Firm Spd (LD)

Credit (Tom Moran/Wendi Lebrocq) have approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following:

	US East Power Phy Fwd Firm LD

Please respond no later than 5pm today, Wednesday, September 26.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Subject:	FW: Please approve - US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE: Please approve - US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)

Stephanie:

Please copy the profiles of the US East Power Phy Fwd Firm LD to the US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD).  Please let me know if there are any questions.

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:52 AM
To:	Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	RE: Please approve - US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)

Wendi,

Could you please review the current profiles for US East Power Phy Fwd Firm LD prior to approving this.  I want to be sure that we copy cp's who have execute rights on both the bid and the offer in order for them to have access to this new product.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!
tm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 4:51 PM
To:	Moran, Tom
Subject:	FW: Please approve - US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)

Tom,

What do you think about coping profiles from US East Power Phy Fwd Firm LD?

Thanks,
Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Moran, Tom; White, Stacey W.; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi, Kelly; Elledge, Susan; Sweitzer, Tara; Moorer, Torrey; Lozano, Melba; Walker, Chris; Mandola, Teresa
Subject:	Please approve - US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)

Your review and approval of the following product types in the EOL Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval, please see steps for approval at the bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call me at ext. 39555.
******** DO NOT APPROVE PRODUCT TYPES BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6AM - 11AM***********

Product Type(s): US East Power Phy Firm Spread (LD)    (2166)

Trader(s): Jeff King
Description(s):	US Pwr PhyLD Spd 	ERCOT N2001 vs ERCOT               USD/MWh

A US Power Spread Transaction (as defined below) with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. under which the Seller (the "Spread Seller") and the Buyer (the "Spread Buyer") shall enter into two physical power transactions, under which either (A) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to buy from Enron, Counterparty shall buy the First Product and sell the Second Product, each in respect of the quantity of Firm (LD) energy equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price in accordance with the terms of the "Firm (LD)" definition in Schedule P of the Edison Electric Institute Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00), including, without limitation, any defined terms contained therein, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the master agreement, if any, that governs these Transactions ("Firm (LD) Energy"); or (B) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to sell to Enron, Counterparty shall sell the First Product and buy the Second Product, each in respect of the quantity of Firm (LD) energy equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price.
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Oct 2001 to the Termination Date 31 Oct 2001.
The Contract Price for the Second Transaction in this short description will be the midpoint of the bid and offer price(s) on the Website for the second product listed in the short description at the time of the Transaction if both the bid and offer prices are then available or the available price if only one of such prices is then available. The Contract Price for the First Transaction will be the Contract Price used for the Second Transaction, modified by the price submitted by the Counterparty on the Website.
The Spread Transaction shall mean the ERCOT Transaction together with the ERCOT N 2001Transaction.  The Spread Seller and the Spread Buyer agree that the ERCOT Transaction and the ERCOT N 2001 Transaction shall be treated as separate transactions under any applicable agreement(s) governing such transactions.  Accordingly, for example, if a party fails to perform under the ERCOT Transaction, the other party is not excused from performance under the ERCOT N 2001 Transaction based on such non-performance.  However, unless otherwise expressly defined, the term "transaction" as used on the Website shall mean each of the ERCOT Transaction and the ERCOT N 2001 Transaction.  The ERCOT Transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy to any points within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. ("ERCOT") at Seller's daily election. If and when possible for Seller to designate under pertinent ERCOT scheduling practices, any such points shall be connected to the ERCOT Transmission Grid by Transmission Facilities (as such terms are defined in the ERCOT Protocols) operated at or above 138kV.  The ERCOT N 2001 transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy to any points within the North 2001 Zone as finalized pursuant to the action on April 17, 2001 by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. ("ERCOT") Board of Directors, at Seller's daily election. If such North 2001 Zone is superceded by a zone or zones of different boundaries, Seller shall nevertheless be required, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, to deliver the energy to points within the geographical area coextensive with the originally defined North 2001 Zone.  If and when possible for Seller to designate under pertinent ERCOT scheduling practices, any such points shall be connected to the ERCOT Transmission Grid by Transmission Facilities (as such terms are defined in the ERCOT Protocols) operated at or above 138kV.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').

==============================================================================

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the 	START button
select 	PROGRAMS
select 	TEST APPLICATIONS
select	ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
	PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the	Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select	EnronOnline (this is the EOL Datamanager)
	PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnline
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Partially Approved"
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Kevin Meredith

EnronOnline
(713) 853-9555


A change in the Higgins Brick contact- Ron the owner will be out have J.
call Lori at 3107722813
----- Original Message -----
From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com>
To: <willwestern@email.msn.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: Customer info

>
> Willis,
>
> I just got off of the phone with my credit guy - He says that most of the
> people on this list are not public companies.  It would be very helpful
and
> will expedite the process if you could get the latest audited financial
> statements, with notes, from each of these companies.  With the PG&E
thing,
> credit is swamped, but, if I had the info in hand, I could push our cause.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim
>
>
>
>
> "Willis C. Bennett" <willwestern@email.msn.com> on 04/06/2001 02:05:05 PM
>
> To:   <kim.ward@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Customer info
>
>
> Hope this helps
>
>
> (See attached file: enron1.xls)
>
>
>


Yesterday, Ken Lay spoke with MidAmerican CEO David Sokol regarding the
attached new legislative amendment to provide a limited PUHCA exemption for
companies with a high level of financial stability as determined by
independent market analysts (i.e. "A" rating for Holding Companies or
investment grade rating for utility companies).  This is not a permanent
exemption as PUHCA would again apply should the company loose its high rating.

MidAmerican's lobbyist reported this conversation to me along with Ken Lay's
reported commitment that we would review it as soon as we could.  Reportedly,
Ken Lay was non-committal but not negatively disposed.

The utility strategy is to have Senator Bob Kerrey (D-NE) offer this as an
amendment to a "must pass" piece of legislation during the waning days of
this Congressional session.  This will be separate from the utilities'
strategy to enact Private Use legislation (H.R. 4971, S. 2967 which includes
tax language to exclude water and sewage connection fees from gross income as
contributions to capital and language to increase the amount permitted to
paid into nuclear decommissioning reserve funds primarily  for Commonwealth
Edison) and to enact stand-alone Reliability legislation (S. 2071 and H.R.
2944).

Senator Kerrey has already spoken to Senator Gramm (R-TX) about this PUHCA
amendment and Gramm was reportedly  non-committal but not negatively disposed
to the idea.  I will follow-up with Gramm's staff next week after they've
reviewed it and convey their views to you.  According to MidAmerican,  the
concept to insure stockholder protection along with consumer protection was
Senator Kerrey's idea.

It is possible that Congressman Dingell (D-MI) and Congressman Markey (D-MA)
would still actively oppose this limited exemption, especially given the fact
that Congressman Dingell (who would Chair the Commerce Committee should the
Democrats regain control of the House) has recently said that whether or not
he is Commerce Committee Chairman next Congress, that comprehensive
electricity restructuring legislation including PUHCA repeal is "at least
three years away from happening."

Steve and Rick, can we get a temperature gauge next week as to our position
on this amendment?  As a reminder, Enron's position here-to-date has been to
oppose stand-alone PUHCA repeal as this is the one provision utilities like
Southern Company really want.  To date, this strategy has worked with the
MidAmerican Utility Group willing to support our transmission open access
provisions in turn for our PUHCA exemption support.


Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

The Bidding Period for the PJM July 2001 FTR Auction will open Tuesday, June 12,
2001 (0:00) and will close Monday, June 18, 2001 (24:00).

The results will be posted by Wednesday, June 20, 2001 (17:00).

All FTR Auctions are financially binding.

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


Phillip,

Thank you for meeting with us today. I want to take a few minutes to
summarize the decisions that came out of our meeting.

1. Feedback Approach: We will incorporate the ideas and suggestions you
gave us and move forward with this approach.

2. SME Review of Knowledge System Topics: When the time comes for Topics
reviews, we will send you the name of the SME who is responsible for
sign-off on each topic.

3. Conversion and Arbitrage Problems: We will brainstorm ways to
incorporate more problems without going over our 4-6 hour target. We will
meet with you next Tuesday at 10:00 to review the problems as we've
designed them so far and arrive at a solution. (I will send an e-mail
Monday with the room number.)

Have a good weekend.
Mery

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 03/02/2000
12:27 PM ---------------------------

Allison Navin@ENRON
03/02/2000 09:32 AM

To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron comments on Barton bill

Ginger - Attached are Enron's finalized comments on the Barton bill.  Would
you please forward to all the folks in Rick's group and include Steve Kean?
Many thanks.


To All:

Attached please find a preliminary agenda for our upcoming Wharton Risk
Management and Decision Processes Center Advisory Committee Meeting.  We look
forward to seeing all of you on June 14, 2001. Other details regarding the
meeting will be arriving shortly. In the meantime, if you have any questions
or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Kate Fang or myself.

Regards,

Theresa Convery

 <<AGENDA-preliminary.doc>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Theresa Convery
Administrative Assistant
Risk and Decision Processes Center
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
(215) 898-5688/Fax: (215) 573-2130
tconvery@wharton.upenn.edu

 - AGENDA-preliminary.doc


One point you were checking was the CA.  Any luck?

I called pulled off track on a couple of things, but I can get back to this now.  Billy Fleenor says he has some thoughts on structure from a M-to-M standpoint.  Are you guys interested in having that conversation at this time?

Kay

From:	William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 01:18 PM
To:	Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	RE: NRG bullet points

Kay:

Any progress on drafting a letter of intent, or are you still waiting on feedback from the team?

Just let me know.  Thanks!
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc:	May, Tom; Keeney, William; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject:	Re: NRG bullet points

Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17 AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To:	William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Re: NRG bullet points   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same page before I prepare the LOI.

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >>

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Sorry, I neglected to forward this to you earlier.   You've gotta give these
guys credit for being tenacious!  I'll keep you posted on any meaningful
developments after their meeting with DOE on the 25th.  Thanks for your
patience.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/13/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           07/10/2000 02:39 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Pueblo

 Just got an update on the project that won't go away.  Dennis has a meeting
lined up with DOE decisionmakers on the 25th.  He is going to pitch the
project as an approximately 100 mw power plant, to be owned by (read
"financed by") DOE, with the gas pipeline owned by Dennis and\or third
parties (read "Enron"?).  Dennis has run economics that show the DOE will get
a more than 10% cost savings on the project compared to current PNM rates,
even assuming a fairly high gas transport cost because of the smaller gas
load.  How did he do it?  Very easy:  they ran the power plant economics
using about a $2.00 gas cost instead of current, real world prices.   Dennis'
argument is going to be:  "I'll take the risk on building the pipeline and
the power plant at a capped cost, and then sell the power plant to you."
"You take the risk on gas cost:  if gas cost tracks the 18-24 month average,
you will realize your 10% cost savings, but if current fuel costs continue or
escalate, you lose."    Either way, your reliability improves and you kick
PNM in the shins."  Dennis and Tino apparently think they can sell DOE on
this.  By the way, their current story on Richardson is that he won't resign,
and won't be forced out by the administration because that would create even
more publicity.  You'll love this:  they think Richardson is even more likely
to sign off on the deal now because his chances of being nominated for VP or
cabinet are dead and he now has nothing to lose in DC.  They think his real
angle is now to bring home the bacon to New Mexico and then run for governor
out there!!  Apparently the rank and file out in the home state think he got
hosed and made a scapegoat unfairly.
 I've asked  Lorna Brennan to pull some historical San Juan prices together
to give to Tino to confirm whether his $2 price is wacky.  Other than that, I
just told Tino that we are potentially interested in the pipeline part of the
project if the risks and rewards make sense, and that EE&CC might be
interested in the design/build on all of it.  He said he'd get back to me
after the 25th meeting and tell me whether the project is undead.  DF


Pls incorporate as appropriate into our presentation.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:10 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	CALIFORNIA SUCCESS  & ISSUES

Please update with other info.

Jim


Guys, I assume you are keeping an eye on "California East".  Any help you can
give Kevin would be much appreciated.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/17/2000
06:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           12/15/2000 07:39 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NYPSC Interim Pricing Report on ISO

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
07:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           12/15/2000 07:32 AM

To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dave Delainey, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: NYPSC Interim Pricing Report on ISO

This NY cap proposal must be prevented.   The proposal is essentially
cost-based regulation.   Obviously, if the proposal below was adopted by NY,
Enron's ability to make money is greatly diminished.   In addition, it has
significant effects on the rest of the market in terms of regulatory
uncertainty in the forward markets.

In the past, FERC has ruled to make caps consistent in all 3 NE regions (NY,
NE, and PJM), which leads to quasi caps in the rest of the Eastern
Interconnect.

Jim,
We need an action plan ASAP.   Please coordinate with Dana, Tom May, and
myself.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
07:22 AM ---------------------------

Tom May@ENRON
12/14/2000 06:13 PM
To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Gautam
Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: NYPSC Interim Pricing Report on ISO

FYI.  In the interest of all the developing markets, I think that we need to
make a full court press to ensure that this does not get enough support to
pass at the committee level in New York.  I will arrange a meeting with
regulatory to plan our response.

Tom.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 12/14/2000 06:09 PM
---------------------------
From: Howard Fromer on 12/14/2000 04:30 PM
To: Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug
Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Suneet Sharma/HOU/EES@EES, Gary
Keevill/ECP/Enron@Enron, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NYPSC Interim Pricing Report on ISO

Earlier today, the New York Public Service Commission released a 122 page
draft report prepared by its staff evaluating the NYISO. The report concludes
that the ISO must pursue a wide range of operational reforms and other
consumer safeguards to "ensure a more efficient and stable electric market
that will better protect consumers from dramatic price increases." The report
culminates a months-long investigation begun by the PSC last summer in
response to problems and price run-ups in the wholesale market.

The major recommendations in the Report, some of which have already surfaced
in recent ISO Committee meetings, would be devastating to a competitive
wholesale market and would largely reregulate prices in New York. They
include the following (taken directly from the PSC's Press Release):

Reforming rules and procedures to improve the efficiency of the market and
minimize opportunities for market manipulation, or "gaming," by owners of
electricity generating facilities;
Initiating a $150 per megawatt hour price cap on generators to maintain
reasonable market clearing prices;
Creating a "circuit-breaker" mechanism that will prevent market power abuses
at levels below $150/MWH;
Lowering price thresholds significantly to allow the NYISO to step in more
quickly to investigate and mitigate price spikes;
Granting the NYISO retroactive refund authority to return to consumers gains
that generators improperly derive from market power abuse; and,
Creating a strong deterrent against price abuses by penalizing generators who
repeatedly use improper tactics to raise prices above competitive levels.

The NYPSC, of course, has no legal authority to impose any of these
recommendations. However, they are likely to muster support from the
Transmission Owners, governmental entities and loads, that usually control
enough votes to just  pass a motion at an ISO Committee. This will set up a
confrontation with the ISO Board, which is walking a delicate tightrope
between maintaining its independence and supporting a competitive wholesale
market on the one hand, and dealing with the politics of a hostile
Administration in New York. Last summer, as you may recall, the Board
rejected the $1000 bid cap pushed through by the PSC, voting instead for a
$1300 cap. That action was set aside by FERC, which reimposed the $1,000
level and then made it applicable in New England as well so that there would
be consistency among the three Northeast ISOs (PJM already had the $1,000
cap.)

Thus, whether NY follows the lead of California is likely to be determined by
FERC, and it will have to carefully consider the consistency concerns it
raised last summer in ultimately deciding whether it's OK for New York to set
price caps below its neighboring ISOs.

Attached is a copy of the PSC's Press Release and Report.

http://www.dps.state.ny.us/fileroom/doc8945.pdf


Nagesh ,

I would like to have the CPR Position Manager resorted for the Texas/HPLC
screen as Follows:

Houston Pipe Line
East Texas Gas Systems
NNGB
Humble Gas Pipeline
Oasis Pipeline Company
PG&E Valero
PG&E TECO
Remaining pipelines in alphabetical order.

In addition to this, please sort the location level (zones) under Houston
Pipeline as follows:

01-Thompsonville
14-South Texas
02-Robstown
19-King Ranch
11-Corpus
03-A/S South
04-A/S Central
07-A/S East
08-East Texas
15-Katy
16-West Loop
10-Ship Channel
Remaining zones in numerical order

Let me know if you have any questions or problems.  Thanks.

Daren


Attached is a draft of the SSEP standard packaging contract.  This is
currently
being converted to our EDrafter Web-based format (The business person fills
in a
database of information and populates the document, which is then sent to the
customer).  Our next phase in this process would actually be to make EDrafter
available to the customers for them to fill it in and work from it in a
ProjectNet extranet workroom environment.

Regardless of what document we end up with in our process, I think we should
consider a similar process for our "template document".  It would be efficient
for the business people (for example, the SSEP sales force can generate the
attached contract in about 10 minutes) and would free up legal time for both
parties.  Just food for thought.

Kent

 <<Package Standard Contract.doc>>

 - Package Standard Contract.doc


Dear ALJ Biren:
?
Attached is?Exhibit 22, which during the hearings was  admitted?with my WHP
direct?testimony (Ex. 8) on June 5, 2000.? I  understand that you
directed?parties to provide electronic copies of all  exhibits.? This
complies with that directive.? Thank you.
?
?
John Burkholder
?
on behalf of Western Hub Properties, LLC
?
BETA Consulting
Burkee@cts.com
(760) 723-1831 Voice
(760)  723-1891 FAX
 - Exhibit22-GIR(WHPALJQ2.1.3.5).doc


Ever wonder what happens to the ideas in the Idea Vault?  The possibilities
are almost endless, but here is how your idea might be "discovered":
Putting your idea in the Idea Vault gets it in front of everyone at Enron.
You might make a connection with someone on the other side of the world who
is working on a similar concept.
The eThink team checks regularly, and, when we know who might be able to
help, we route ideas to various people at Enron.
Various business groups check the Idea Vault in their weekly staff meetings
to see if Enron's next big initiative is waiting there.
The Enron Xcelerator is looking for fresh business initiatives, and they
might find some in the Idea Vault.

Visit the ThinkBank today and make a deposit or a withdrawal!

Tuesday, Mar. 6, at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Judy Schlesinger on eSpeak.
Judy, the manager of eSource, will be on hand to answer your questions and
explain how the eSource research group's industry specialists and resources
can help you gain a competitive advantage.

If you attended or watched the all-employee meeting on Feb. 21, you heard
Jeff and Ken introduce our new vision "To Become the World's Leading
Company."  What do you think it will take to make this happen?  Share your
ideas in the new eMeet category:  "The World's Leading Company:  What Will it
Take?"


sara- valentis llc is definitely domestic.. checking on delaware or CT..

Their inhouse legal counsel is Arthur Amron... please cc him on ISDA..
aamron@wexford.com 212 203 862 7012

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/25/2001 09:03 AM
To: Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Re: Valentis and CD Holdings

Caroline:

No Deemed ISDA, we decided that yesterday for the long-dated deal.

We are working on the draft masters for emailing.  Please send me the
information about your counterparties' lawyers so we can begin negotiating.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	04/25/2001 06:42 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron
		 Subject: Valentis and CD Holdings

Please send the draft ISDAS to:

Marty Lifgren- mlifgr@wexford.com
Charles Davidson- cdavid@wexford.com

We agreed that the fastest way to proceed wwas to send the ISDA or can we
still send the deemed ISDA?.


Christi & Sarah --

Do we have to do something related to this?  Thanks.

Jim

Note also that in a separate development FERC
simultaneously opened a broad investigation under Section
206 of the Federal Power Act to apply the new
market-based-sales policy to all U.S. sellers nationwide.
What this means is that, although only three utilities are
mentioned in this initial order, it is expected that FERC
will continue to take steps to constrain what it believes
to be erratic wholesale markets. Reportedly, some 30
companies are awaiting similar reviews by FERC to
determine if the commission believes they exert market
power. The 206 investigation reportedly also requires
power providers with market-based sales authority to amend
their tariffs within 60 days to provide FERC with
open-ended authority to order refunds if the commission
determines that market manipulation has occurred.


Joe Stepenovitch dropped: Garner, Charlie OAK RB
and acquired: Biakabutuka, Tim CAR RB

Natural Gas Gridiron Address:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/home/0205

Questions about this site?  Check out our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
at http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/support_faq.html
or our detailed on-line help at
http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/coach.html


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 08:49 AM -----

	Tanya Roy <troy@chbh.com>
	12/27/2000 06:48 PM

		 To: "'Dick.Varner@eweb.eugene.or.us'" <Dick.Varner@eweb.eugene.or.us>,
"'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: Jim Deason <Jdeason@chbh.com>, Larry Cable <lcable@chbh.com>, Tom Grim
<Tgrim@chbh.com>
		 Subject: EWEB-ENRON Conference Call

A dial-in conference call has been scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday,
December 28, 2000 at 9:30 a.m. pacific standard time to discuss the
EWEB-ENRON deal.

The Dial-In Phone Number is:
1+888-311-9051
Access Code #: 30003

If you have any questions regarding this conference call, please call.
Thank you.

Tanya Roy
for Jim Deason
Cable Huston Benedict Haagensen & Lloyd LLP


Howard,

Thanks for the message and the paper.
We shall hold an internal  follow-up meeting next Monday to
review potential projects on which we could cooperate in
the future.

Vasant and I will contact you to discuss our recommendations
regarding the future research agenda.

Vince

"Kunreuther, Howard" <kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu> on 12/14/2000 10:07:11 AM
To: "Bouillion (E-mail)" <james.l.bouillion@enron.com>, "Carrick (E-mail)"
<george.carrick@enron.com>, "Hoog (E-mail)" <david.hoog@enron.com>, "Kaminski
(E-mail)" <vkamins@enron.com>, "Vasant (E-mail)" <vshanbh@ect.enron.com>
cc: "Doherty, Neil A" <doherty@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Kleindorfer, Paul"
<kleindorfer@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Thomas, Louis A"
<thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Weigelt, Keith W" <weigelt@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Working with ENRON on catastrophic risk

Dear Vince, Jim, George, David and Vasant:

Neil Doherty, Paul Kleindorfer and I very much enjoyed our discussion last
Wednesday at Wharton  with you on future joint research  with Enron over the
coming year. In particular, we see the whole area of capital management and
catastrophic risk as a fruitful area for foint collaboration. I am sharing
this message with Louis Thomas and Keith Weigelt who direct the FAP MBA
program in the hopes that we can find a team to work with us on these issues
next semester.

Attached is a revised version of our paper on "Evaluating Risk Bearing,
Mitigation and Risk Transfer Using Exceedance Probability Curves: Project
Update".   We would greatly appreciate you and your colleagues looking at the
section on "Cat Bonds Covering Multiple Risks" (pp. 15-19) to see whether our
example and conclusions make sense to you. We look forward to working with
your team at Enron   regarding ways that we can build on these preliminary
findings to make cat bonds for weather risks  more attractive.

Best wishes for the holiday.

Regards,

Howard
 Howard Kunreuther
Cecilia Yen Koo Professor of Decisions Sciences and Public Policy
Chairperson   Operations and Information Management Department
1326 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall
Wharton School
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6366
Phone:215-898-4589
FAX:215-573-2130
Email:kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu

 - EPCurvePaper-FINAL-D10.doc


Dear  ANDREW, Enron? K-Mart? Major companies are folding, Executives are  ripping off the little guy.   Who can you trust?  Yourself.  Did you hear the story of the guy who had a 1.5 million  dollar 401K with Enron and it's now worth ZERO! There's no better time to  think about having something to fall back on... a business of your  own.   I've made millions of dollars on the Internet and I  answer to no one. I have no boss and I can say "no" to whomever I wish  (except my wife). If I don't want to get up until 10 a.m. one day, I  don't. If I don't want to work 5 days a week, I won't.  No one runs  my life except me and nobody can ruin it.  It should be this  way for everyone. And it can. You CAN do what I've done and find freedom  through owning your own business. The only thing that is stopping you  right now... is YOU!  I'll even make it easy on you. I'll guarantee  that you can use my system and make $1,000 in 15 days or less! I've done  it regularly for years now, and so can you!    <CLICK HERE>  to find out how....

 The previous was an advertisement. The views  expressed in it are those of the MiningGold only. As with any business  you could make more or less money than the results described. Your  results will be based on your individual monetary investments, business  experience, expertise, and your level of desire. There are no guarantees  concerning the level of success you may experience, other than MiningGold's  product performance & return policy, if applicable.      You are receiving  this Special Offer as a valued iExpect.com member. If you do not wish  to receive any Special Offers from us in the future, please click here   to unsubscribe.[IMAGE]


Karen:

Here are additional suggestions:

Larry Ellison, Oracle
Carol Baartz, Autodesk
Steve Jobs, Apple
Jim Morgan, Applied Materials
Ko Nishamura, Solectron
Scott Cook or Steven Bennett, Intuit
Brian Halla, National Semi
Eric Benhamou, 3Com

Let me know if you plan to add them and I'll email their government affairs
folks.

Piper

From: Karen.Denne@enron.com
Importance: High
X-Priority: 1 (High)
Subject: Meeting Info for Thursday
To: piper.cole@Sun.COM
Cc: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:10:33 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14,
2000) at 05/14/2001 07:05:29 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline

Piper -- Thanks so much for your assistance in pulling this meeting
together.  Attached is a sample invitation we'll send from Ken Lay to the
CEOs of the companies in the attached spreadsheet.  I appreciate your calls
to the policy folks at these companies to supplement the email from Ken --
hopefully, we'll get a good turnout.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thank you!

Karen

(See attached file: NoCalCEOInvite.doc)(See attached file:
NoCalCEOinvitelist.xls)
_____________________________________________________________________
_______
/______/\  Piper Cole
/_____ \\ \  Vice President, Global Public Policy
/______\ \\ /  Sun Microsystems, Inc.
/______/ \/ / / 901 San Antonio Road, MS PAL1-554
/______/ /   \//\ Palo Alto, CA 94303
\______\//\   / /
\______/ / /\ / Phone: 650/336-6633
\______/ \\ \  Fax:   650/336-0835
\______\ \\  E-Mail: piper.cole@sun.com
\______\/  http://www.sun.com/policy


John Van Gelder has recently transferred from EBS-Portland to work in the
West Origination group.

John began working with Enron Energy Services as a summer intern in 1998. In
January 2000, he started working with Enron Broadband Services, and was
promoted from Associate to Manager while working with their Wholesale
Origination group.

John received his Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering at the
University of Kansas and completed the Master's program at the University of
Michigan's School of Business Administration.

Please welcome John to our Portland office!

Regards,

Chris


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 09:56 AM ---------------------------

John Applegate <japplegate@houstonstreet.com> on 03/30/2001 04:57:37 PM
To:	Linda Bradley <lbradley@houstonstreet.com>
cc:	"Frank Getman, Baycorp Holdings" <FGetman@baycorpholdings.com>, "Bob Shults (E-mail)" <bob.shults@enron.com>
Subject:	Testing Schedule

Linda:

FYI, I spoke with Bob Shults this afternoon.  We set up a meeting for Monday
morning, 9:00 EST.  Our objectives are to finalize a testing schedule for
the week, discuss the business questions we emailed Bob on Thursday, and
develop specific metrics to define when we are ready for "go live" from
Enron's standpoint.

John

John Applegate
Vice President
Business Development
(603) 766-8706
 <<John Applegate.vcf>>

 - John Applegate.vcf


Chris, you are officially the king today!  With the PSCo deal this
effectively eliminates the LM position assuming we successfully sell LV.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:15 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
10/04/2000 07:16 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CA ISO Sumer Reliability Generation

Dave,

The CA ISO Board met today and approved a plan to provide capacity subsidies
to up to 2,000 MW of new supply.  There was 71 proposals from 24 companies.
We offered 7 proposals.  Their decision criteria is ridiculous and subject to
change, but it looks like we won the following:

1 LM6000 - 45MW - Pleasonton - $6.9MM per year for three years -  $153/kwyear

1 LM6000 - 45MW - LODI - $6.9MM per year for three years - $153/kwyear

4 FT4's - 96MW - Southern/Palo Alto - $13.2MM per year for three years -
$137/kwyear

Las Vegas Cogen / EPMI 225MW Palo Verde Sale $10MM per year for three years -
$44/kwyear

In the first three deals, we have the full rights to the energy; capacity
payments are for availability.  These payments, combined with reasonable toll
values, terminal value and EPC costs, make the projects economic (DASH
forthcoming).

The last deal is a bit strange and non-conforming but the ISO likes it
because it is priced very low.  Basically, we agree to deliver power to the
ISO at the California border next summer priced at PX Index plus $20/MWh.  CA
ISO takes power, sells into PX and receives Index.  This is cheaper than what
they are paying for new capacity in state.  The $20 premium is simply the
basis between Palo and SP15.  In 2002 and 2003, LVCogen commits to sell 500
hours to CA ISO and receive PX for its energy.  In 02 and 03, the Palo/SP
spread collapses so an asset buyer sees this $20MM as gravy.

Lot of moving parts - I will keep you posted.  Parquet, Mcdonald and Laird
are doing a great job.

Chris


To the attention of:
Mr Jeffrey K. Skilling
President and Chief Executive Officer
Enron

Dear Mr Skilling,

These are extraordinary times for all of us, and I want to share with you
important news concerning our next Annual Meeting.

The events of 11 September and their aftermath have created a special
interest in our upcoming Annual Meeting. We all share the understanding
that we are living in a new era of fragility and are looking for signposts
that establish a way forward. Participation in our Annual Meeting of top
business, political, intellectual and civil society leaders promises to
make our Annual Meeting, more than ever before, the place where we confront
our problems head-on.

This calls for an Annual Meeting that is much more interactive than in the
past. We therefore have developed a programme concept designed to engage
our Members and participants in dynamic discussion and problem solving on
key aspects of the Global Agenda. We appeal to you to consult the programme
concept from 15 November onwards on our website (http://www.weforum.org)
and to provide us with your feedback as soon as possible.

In order to develop a road map of international cooperation for the future,
we believe the most pressing issues for us to tackle are reversing the
global economic slowdown, bridging the poverty and educational divides,
enhancing security and improving cultural understanding throughout the
world. With these as our goals, we felt that New York would be the ideal
place for our next Annual Meeting. The decision has the enthusiastic
approval of the Forum's Foundation Board and Business Council as well as
the full support of Governor George Pataki and Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. The
Annual Meeting 2002 will represent an unparalleled effort to mobilize all
the leaders behind our mission: to bring business and society together in
partnership to improve the state of the world.

We will work closely with your staff to provide all necessary information
related to travel, accommodation and security. The Meeting will start on
Thursday 31 January and end on Monday 4 February 2002. The principal
location will be the Hotel Waldorf Astoria.

We will spare no efforts to make sure that the informal spirit of Davos and
its hard-working atmosphere are not only preserved but intensified, and
that the Meeting will be truly outstanding in its collective impact. We are
confident that we can count on you to give this exceptional "Davos in New
York" your full support and engagement.

Klaus Schwab
Founder and President
World Economic Forum


Just thought it would be a nice idea if you knew who you were talking to in
the Houston office.

Left to right: Kimberly Hundl, Stephanie Piwetz, Kimberly Indelicato, not an
EPMI employee & Amy Heffernan

Have a great day!

KI


Alert!
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due.  It is critical that you login to iPayit and take immediate action to resolve this invoice.

Remember, you play an important role in ensuring that we pay our vendors on time.

Tip!:  You must login to the system to forward this invoice to another user.

To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
http://iPayit.enron.com
Note:  Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.

First time iPayit user?  For training materials, click on the link below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
North America: ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
Europe: European Accounts Payable at +44-20-7783-7520.
Asia-Pacific: Sydney Accounts Payable at +61-2-9229-2336


I have reserved EB38C1 for the time period 8:30 - 10:30 for Tuesday February
13, 2001.  Will this be sufficient.  If we need more time, we can move back
into my office if necessary.  See you Tuesday.

	Phil DeMoes@ENRON
	02/08/2001 09:59 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Les Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Meeting

Dan,

Lets meet to contiune discussions on the Southern Co LOI Tuesday 9 am if ok
with you.  We should have a better handle on the interruptible issues and the
Venezuela out.


Peter,

Thanks for the update.  By the way, is the new version in Word?

Kay


----- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Cindy Olson Executive VP Human Resources & Community Relations
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	11/13/2000 06:46 PM

		 To: Enron Employees United States
		 cc:
		 Subject: Holiday Schedule 2001
  Cindy Olson  Executive VP
   Human Resources & Community Relations
Please click on the URL below for Enron's 2001 Holiday Schedule.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/2001sched.jpg


Wednesday, November 21st

Breakfast:  Assorted Breakfast Tacos/Fruit
Lunch: Domino's Pizza
Assorted Pizza and Soft Drinks

Monday, November 27th

Breakfast:  Assorted Pastries/Fruit
Lunch:  James Coney Island
Two Coney's (Chilli, Cheese, Onions)
or
One Hamburger (Cheese, Lettuce, Tomato, Pickles, Onions)
Assorted Chips
Cookie or Brownie
Assorted Soft Drinks

Tuesday, November 28th

Breakfast:  Assorted Crossiant Sandwiches/Fruit
Lunch:  Crumley's
Assorted Sandwiches
Tortilla or Baked Potato Soup
Assorted Desserts
Iced Tea


Please find attached our Weekly Report for 3 August 2000.


confusion (created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

  (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Re: OECD Meetings June 26-28, Paris (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on
2/9/2000)

 Development Center Class Reminder  - James D Steffes (created by
Ernie/HOU/ECT on 3/1/2000)

 UPDATED Qwest press release (created by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Draft PGN/Pertamina Singapore Gas Transportation Agreement (created by
Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Revised eSpeak Schedule (created by Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT on 2/11/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 DEN Release (created by Beth Meyer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Gov't Affairs Activities (created by Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/8/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Andrew Makk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mac McClelland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Article re Bush/Enron (created by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 Department of State Personnel Joining Enron's Washington Office In June
(created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/11/2000)

 Motley Fool article (created by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 29 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 2/29/2000)

 Department of Commerce Missions On Clean Energy-Request For Enron's
Participation (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Video Screens in EB Elevator Cabs (created by Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT on
2/11/2000)

 Re: Video Screens in EB Elevator Cabs (created by David Mims/Enron
Communications on 2/11/2000)

 Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Department of Commerce Missions On Clean Energy-Request For Enron's
Participation (created by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Alliance To Save Energy-A Possible Annual Award? (created by Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Meetings in Houston, 14-16 Feb. (created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on
2/9/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

  (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 8 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/8/2000)

 Ask Why? Campaign (created by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Stamp Tax Dispute (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 9 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/9/2000)

 Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700 (created by Carolyn
Green/HOU/AZURIX on 2/9/2000)

 Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia (created by Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Government Affairs - The Americas March 30 Department Meeting (created by
Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 2/25/2000)

  (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: New Position (created by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 1/28/2000)

 MAJOR ACTIVITIES AS OF 1/14/00 (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 1/29/2000)

 Vacation (created by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (created by Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron on 9/21/2000)

 Message not deliverable (created by Administrator@wyden.senate.gov
(Administrator) on 2/26/2001)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Andrew Makk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (created by Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron on 9/21/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)


You are so photogenic and I'm not :( unhappyness.  But your photos look
great.  Perhaps it's the skill of the photographer...wait, I didn't mean
that...please keep sending photos.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:52 PM
To: ted.bockius@ivita.com
Subject: Monaco

(See attached file: MT Monaco 1.jpg)


Interesting reading - some applicable for Florida.

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 01/27/2001
11:20 AM ---------------------------

"Samantha Slater" <SSLATER@epsa.org> on 01/25/2001 10:46:23 AM
To: <Marchris.Robinson@enron.com>, <steven.krimsky@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: CPC Dual Fuel Study

As promised...

Samantha

Samantha M. Slater
Manager of State & Regional Affairs
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, N.W.
Suite 760
Washington, D.C.  20005
Phone: 202-789-7200
Fax: 202-789-7201
E-mail: sslater@epsa.org

 - New_England_NG_Rpt_101000.pdf


General Counsel of Enron Americas


Rebecca, lets just go forward with HPL on Thursday - Tex Mex, after going
through with the deal team, still has some issues to be resolved.  We will
push this into Q1.  The HPL deal is anticipated to be signed on Thursday
afternoon or Friday morning.

Regards
Delainey


testing you bitch.
mat


Tim -- Cindy manages this program.
Mary -- please give some thought to how we might solicit employee views on
this.
Cindy -- I believe we already allow matching of donations to quasi-religious
organizations: religious schools, for example, and perhaps relief
organizations like Catholic Relief Services?  I think that if we want to
consider extending it we should probably discuss it in a smaller group than
the e-speak forum --  the Enron Foundation Board perhaps?  This could become
controversial, though (recall the Planned Parenthood debate and the periodic
attempts of shareholders to add restrictions through the proxy mechanism).
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/01/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------

Timothy J Detmering@ECT
07/31/2000 05:52 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron's Matching Gift Program

Here is one I just know you will like to spend time on.  I want to try to
convince us to change our matching gift program to allow matching of gifts to
religious organizations.  My suggestion: hold a discussion on eThink, and the
let employees cast a vote.  Please advise.


FYI. As if we weren't having enough fun with electricity....
Note last paragraph of press release calling on government to "get out of the
way" and "let the private sector solve the problems in the gas market."

Jeff

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   CONTACT: James Fisfis
March 5, 2001        (916) 319-2071

GOP MOVES NATURAL GAS TO FRONT BURNER
Assembly Republicans join together once again to request Davis to call
special session.

(SACRAMENTO) ) Assembly Republicans united Monday in asking Governor Gray
Davis to call a special session of the California legislature to deal with
skyrocketing natural gas prices.

&Families and businesses are reeling every month from extraordinary gas
prices.  Pardon the expression, but the natural gas crisis no longer belongs
on California,s back burner,8 said Assembly Republican leader Bill Campbell
(R ) Villa Park).

Assembly Republicans unanimously signed a letter to Governor Gray Davis
asking for him to convene a special session of the legislature to deal with
California,s skyrocketing natural gas bills.  Republicans delivered the
letter to Davis this morning.

&A special session is both a symbolic and a practical necessity.  It tells
Californians that we care about their skyrocketing gas bills.  It tells
businesses everywhere that California is going to provide for its future
energy needs,8 said Campbell.  &Practically speaking, a special session also
allow us to pass legislation which can take effect immediately.8

Republicans believe the electricity and natural gas crises are inextricably
linked.

&California,s natural gas crisis is completely intertwined with its
electricity crisis,8 said Campbell.  &Any plan to deal with our electricity
crisis must have a natural gas component or Californians are going to pay
unacceptably high prices for both.8

Assembly Republicans believe the natural gas crisis has many fronts, all of
which could be addressed comprehensively by a special session.

&Natural gas issues include pipeline capacity, storage, exploration,
alternative fuels and conservation,8 said Campbell.  &A special session lets
us put together a comprehensive solution.8

&The private sector has the expertise and the capital to deal with these
issues if government would just get out of the way.  Republicans believe that
a legislative solution to the natural gas crisis should leave the resources
and primary decision-making to the private sector,8 said Campbell.

# # #
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/05/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

in case you didn't see this

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 03:12 PM -----

	"Costigan, Richard" <Richard.Costigan@asm.ca.gov>
	03/05/2001 02:51 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

 <<press release.doc>>  <<Natgastps - rep legislation.doc>>  <<Republican
Energy Address.doc>>  <<QA.doc>>  <<DOE powerpoint.ppt>>

Attached are documents that were part of today's Assembly GOP press
conference on the pending natural gas crisis.  If you have any questions,
please call me.

Thanks,

RSC

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
(916) 319-2071

 - press release.doc
 - Natgastps - rep legislation.doc
 - Republican Energy Address.doc
 - QA.doc
 - DOE powerpoint.ppt


NYMEX Membership Services
March 19, 2001
Notice # MS-18

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 14, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

John D. Leahy (LAHY-4596)

Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-18)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Casey,

I ran curve queries for the RIJ-N and R6W-Z ancillary curves we discussed the other day.  The queries showed that delta positions were captured for these ancillary curves, which goes against what we discussed yesterday - no VaR on ancillary positions.  (I assume that since we have positions that there is a VaR unless there's another workaround outside of the query) FYI - I used the curve grabber tool in the rac website.

Please give me a call in the a.m. to discuss.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:10 PM
To:	Considine, Keith
Cc:	Trevino, Susan; White, Stacey W.; Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: Ancillary Curves

Excellent question.  Currently I am working with Research to determine correct VAR methodology for ancillaries and as such we do not measure risk on these curves.  Even though this is the case we still require curves to be posted and maintained.
Thanks
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Considine, Keith
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Trevino, Susan; White, Stacey W.; Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	Ancillary Curves

Frank,

The voicemail I left was regarding ancillary curves requested by John.  Burton may have emailed you on the request earlier.  I'm following up b/c he's out.

Question - Do we have a rule regarding whether or not we calculated VaR and capture positions for ancillary business?  Based on discussions with Casey Evans we don't report ancillary activity for her regions (var or positions).  In order to keep consistency across the business, it seems that we would either report all ancillary or none.

Please advise.

Regards

KC


Per our conversation.  Help!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Jaime
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: Irvin, Steve
Subject: FW: Rio Bravo Open Season

FYI...

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Smith [mailto:ibsjhs@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Williams, Jaime
Subject: Fw: Rio Bravo Open Season

Jaime:
Here is the attached CA from El Paso should you have interest in pursuing
capacity on the proposed pipeline to Rio Bravo.
Julie Smith
303-279-1419
----- Original Message -----
From: "Calvo, Armando" <Armando.Calvo@ElPaso.com>
To: <ibsjhs@earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:08 AM
Subject: Rio Bravo Open Season

>
> Please find the attached message about the Rio  Bravo Project.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>  <<Carta OPEN SEASON RIO.doc>>  <<Rio Bravo Open Season Confidentiality
> Agreement 110801.DOC>>
>
>
> ******************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
> Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the
> sender.
> ******************************************************************
>


I think it would be good for us all to settle on a standard level of daily and monthly tolerance.

It will be easier to manage the system if we have consistency.

I understand we may need one standard for larger interconnects and one for smaller interconnects.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:47 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Bryant, Mike
Subject:	FW: Trunkline OBA

Mike, were you ok with the 5% daily tolerance and the 50,000 Dth monthly tolerance?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Sharon
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:53 PM
To:	King Jr., Frazier
Subject:	RE: Trunkline OBA

I discussed wtih Mike before I drafted it.   Trunkline is completely different.   THey are smaller interconnects in constrained areas.    They have a tendency to underdeliver at one of the points.  We don't want to give them alot of slack, but netting together cuts our exposure.   Sheila is Director of Gas Logistics ---- that's who always looked at them before, if at all.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Farrell, Sharon
Subject:	RE: Trunkline OBA

Sharon

I'm not sure Sheila is the one for sign off.
Also, I'm not sure we have our act together.
We need to do that before the draft goes out.
I am especially concerned about the suggested tolerances.
Given our recent discussions, they may be too low.
If anything, it seems like they are less then the recent Shelley/Mike guidelines.
(Maybe we need some more "official" guidelines.)
If Trunkline sees these numbers, it may be hard to change the tolerances.
Finally, Shelley and Mike may be concerned if we sent it out without their comments.
I will continue to press for input.

Frazier

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Sharon
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:17 PM
To:	King Jr., Frazier
Subject:	RE: Trunkline OBA

Why can't we just get Sheila's signoff.    It isn't like we are doing anything radical here.   Trunkline hasn't even seen it yet, so they might make more changes --- it's just our standard GISB agreement.   I think Trunkline should actually review before Shelley anyway.   (for discussion purposes)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:45 PM
To:	Farrell, Sharon
Subject:	Trunkline OBA

Sharon,

I have placed several calls to Shelley about the Trunkline OBA.
I have not heard back and she is not in today.
So, I just sent the draft to Mike to get his input.

Frazier


Do you have the same for the income side?

Gregory Adams
03/14/2000 08:26 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Credit Rating Ratios

Rod,

Here are the credit rating ratios you requested for evaluating a potential
deal.

In the spreadsheet I have given you two sets of figures for the year 2000 --
one set represents what was shown to the Board of Directors in December, the
second set is the current set of "rating agency targets" for the year.

Please call me if you have any questions -- or need assistance formulating an
analysis.

Greg Adams


Keith,
Ron's note pretty well summed it up.  Sorry my earlier correspondence didn't speak clearly enough to these issues.  This is a new electric generation plant.  It doesn't necessarily fall into any existing utility service area, as far as I know.  If anything, it might fall into the City of Famrmington's muni gas service.  However, if the City of Farmington is funding the plant (including  the cost of the interconnect) through muni bonds, it's doubtful they'll have any problem with the source of supply.

I'm interested in the theory that would necessitate our receiving prior permission to interconnect with a direct end-use customer in any area, uncontested or otherwise.  They'll be building the lateral line (or we'll build it, but they own it).  All we're really doing here is the delivery point.  I understood this situation fits within the FERC's new guidelines for construction of such facilities, and would not require a prior notice filing.

Let me know what additional information you might need.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001 09:58 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Ronald Matthews                           01/25/2001 09:49 AM

To:	Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

Ameramex Energy Farm Project will be a new facility with no current supplier.  The location is approximately 0.75 miles southeast of the Bloomfield station.  The load would be served form the San Juan Hub and would not effect firm capacity through Bloomfield.  If you need any details from a Marketing perspective, please call Jeff Fawcett.

Ron M.

Keith Petersen
01/25/2001 08:19 AM
To:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Bret Fritch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

Ron, is this a new plant?  Or is it existing?  If it is an existing plant, is it being served presently?  If it is receiving service, by who?  If this is a by-pass, we will need to file a Prior Notice or obtain a signature from the group serving the load agreeing to the by-pass.

Please let Bret know what the situation is.

Keith

---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001 08:09 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Mary Kay Miller                           01/25/2001 07:43 AM

To:	Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Re: Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

For your info-  MK
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001 07:43 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Ronald Matthews                           01/25/2001 07:13 AM

To:	Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, terry.galassini@enron.com

Subject:	Re: Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

I have talked with the San Juan team and all are aware of the upcoming meeting.  The team leader is Tracy Kuehl but Chris Gaston, Jeff Grieder, Tom Murphy, Blackie Foutz who are on the team can all help with this project.  I will be out of the office until Feb. 5, 2001 but I can be reached by pager, 877-726-7034, or cell phone, 713-304-1021.  My pager has the capability of accepting alpha messages.  You can send them through Lotus Notes with the address of 8777267034@skytel.com.  Do not enter a subject.  Just type in the message area.  Please include you name at the end so I will know who it's from.  If you can set up a meeting after Feb. 5 (preferably Feb. 8 or 9) I would appreciate it so I can attend.

Ron M.

Jeffery Fawcett
01/24/2001 05:39 PM
To:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

Rick Moore with Ameramex called and said their project is moving forward- on a fairly expedited basis.  They've recently obtained a City of Farmington pledge of public funds (a precursor to a formal bond issue) to underpin the financing.

To refresh your memory, this project is another "trigeneration" project.  Ameramex will use the waste steam from the electric generation turbines to heat a hydroponic lettuce farm, as well as use the combustion carbon dioxide.  We've previously provided a route map and estimate (0.75 mi. of 4" pipe, $486K direct/indirect cost) to Ameramex.

Ameramex's financing deal is now dependent upon completion of the interconnect and commencement of service in approx. 7 months.  To this end, Ameramax has requested a walk through of the potential route and a revised (if necessary) estimate of the cost to interconnect.  There are several other issues to be dealt with here, including what is the final deal structure; including whether TW may possibly providing interim financing until the issuance of the muni bonds.

Rick Moore would like to get together with myself and representatives of operations and/or engineering to survey the route and decide on the ultimate design/configuration of facilities.  Depending on the outcome of the survey, he'd like a formal proposal for TW for financing the construction of the lateral and interconnect facilities.

Ron, since you provided all the prior facility planning support, I'd like for you to continue providing the liason support to TW Commercial on this project.  I'll also be calling on the San Juan Team to work with you and engineering to optimize the design/routing of this interconnect/lateral pipeline.  I'll work with the customer to set-up a site meeting when you return to work after 2/5/01.

To bring you and others up to speed, I've included a couple of the original email(s) giving a little more detail on the estimate and a map of the route:

Ronald Matthews
06/16/2000 03:32 PM
To:	Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Energy Farms Project

Jeff,

I talked with the San Juan team and came up with a pipeline route to the proposed Energy Farms site located in S1/2  SE1/4  Sec. 13, T29N, R11W, and the NE1/2  NE1/4 Sec. 24, T29N, R11W all in San Juan County, NM.  Per the correspondence, Energy Farms is looking at a delivery around 15 MMcf/d.  The best approach to serving this load would be to take gas from the suction side of Bloomfield CS.  The 4" pipeline would start there a travel about 0.75 miles to the northwest section of the proposed site (see attached map).  A metering facility would be located at the beginning of the pipeline still inside of TW's property along with the other meter facilities.  Below is a breakdown of the facility cost.  Estimated costs are + 30% and would have to be refined.

0.75 miles of 4" pipeline & side valve		$286,500

4" orifice meter run w/ gallagher flow 		$199,900
conditioner, & flow control

						$486,400

There is a possibility that the meter facility costs could be lower by using an existing metering header system but a more detailed review would be required.  Please feel free to call if you have any questions.  I will send you a copy of the estimated costs for both the pipeline and measurement since they can't be attached.

Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 11:37 AM
To:	Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Bloomfield Project

Attached see a note I sent to Rick Moore.  Rick works for a company called Amerimex.  Rick and I worked together in gas supply at EPNG ("the early years").  Amerimex is a developer of "trigeneration" projects.  In addition to the subject project for Bloomfield, another one is being considered for Santa Theresa, N.M.  If you recall, we were introduced to trigeneration when we were discussing an electric generation plant on the site of a hydroponic tomato greenhouse near Gallup.

Trigeneration is an environmentally friendly technology that utilizes the "byproducts" of electric generation.  "Cogeneration" refers to the process where waste heat/steam generated during the combustion of gas turbines is sold commercially (usually to manufacturing facilities) for plant purposes.  "Trigeneration," on the other hand, refers the process where not only is the waste heat/steam utilized, but also the carbon dioxide.  Therefore, trigeneration is a perfect fit for a greenhouse that requires both heat and carbon dioxide for the plants.

Amerimex has proposed a hydroponic lettuce greenhouse in the Bloomfield, N.M. area.  The facility, to be constructed turnkey by United Technologies, would have a nominal rating of 70 MW, resulting in a gas burn of about 15 MMcf/d.  The plant would require gas deliveries at approx. 500 psig.  The outtake power would be sold both locally and on the grid using a TriStates 69kv transmission line that is proximate to the site.  Given the "politically correct" nature of these facilities, the City of Farmington has agreed to fund construction with a $70MM bond.

As you can see, we're in the very earliest stages of conversation.  We'll keep the group posted on progress.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 04/18/2000 10:38 AM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 10:38 AM
To:	rmoore01@elp.rr.com
cc:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Bloomfield Project

Rick,
It was really great visiting with you the other day.  It never ceases to amaze me how small a world this is.  I hope this project moves forward and we get the opportunity to work together again.

Attached for your use is the schematic you spoke with Ron Matthews about.  It's not too terribly detailed, so I don't know if it will be useful or not.  We have much more detailed images of the Bloomfield area on our alignments, but without a legal description, we're a little blind.

I don't know if you've had a chance to get the legal description for the proposed plant site yet or not, but if you have it, would you forward that on to me?  We could then get started at not only putting together a rough cost estimate for the tap and meter, but we could begin looking for the best route for a lateral line between the facilities.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


I don't know.  Which entity did the weather trade?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bell, Rebecca
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: AIG Commodity Arbitrage Fund Ltd. and AIG Commodity Arbitrage Fund L.P.

Marie,

Which Deemed ISDA is for me to use on W1597.1 for weather?

Thanks,
Becca

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Mulvany, Patrick; Bell, Rebecca
Cc:	Radous, Paul
Subject:	AIG Commodity Arbitrage Fund Ltd. and AIG Commodity Arbitrage Fund L.P.

Patrick and Rebecca:

Attached are the Deemed ISDAs for the referenced counterparties.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie

		 << File: 032conf(aig comm arb. fund ltd.).doc >> 	 << File: 033conf(aig comm arb. fund lp).doc >>


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	01/18/2001 06:40 PM

		 To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carmen Ayala/Enron@enronXgate, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Hillier/Enron@enronXgate, Paul
Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

Attached is what I hope is a pretty complete list of the EnronOnline
contracts I have been made aware of.  There are a few I have open questions
about  or am waiting to receive copies of the contract.  Can each of you
please take a look and think about whether there are any others we may be
missing.  Again, my time frame is short here, so if I can get your response
promptly I would be most appreciative.