>From: "HR News" <NEWSLETTER@ROUTE.MONSTER.COM>

>To: mcausholli@hotmail.com <MCAUSHOLLI@HOTMAIL.COM>

>Subject: Can You Have It All?

>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 1:23:13 -0500

>

>THE MONSTER.COM HR NEWSLETTER

>http://hr.monster.com

>

>To send feedback or unsubscribe, please scroll to the end of this

>newsletter. Do not use the "reply" button.

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>IN THIS ISSUE:

>Week of November 26, 2001

>

>-- FEATURE: Can You Have It All?

>-- FEATURE: Confront Your Fears and Communicate

>-- HEARD ON THE BOARDS: Ex-Employer Sabotage

>-- JOB LISTINGS

>

>Switch your newsletter subscription to the HTML version here:

>http://forums.monster.com/switch.asp?m1=43&m2=4&u=20794906

>

>---------------------------advertisement------------------------------

>Capella University

>

>Complete Your Bachelor's Degree Online

>

>Capella University's accredited Bachelor of Science degree completion

>program in Business enables busy professionals to advance their

>career by completing their degree through a flexible, online learning

>format that accommodates career, family and other commitments. To

>find out more visit:

>

>http://r.monster.com/r.asp?112801_04_01

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>FEATURE: Can You Have It All?

>by Roberta Chinsky Matuson

>

>Can an HR professional really have a career and family without

>tipping the scales? HR professionals are facing the same issues as

>the employees they support. But can they take advantage of the

>programs they administer? Find out here.

>http://hr.monster.com/articles/balance/

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>DASHING THROUGH THE DOUGH

>

>Stuff your stocking with cash this holiday season. Search for a

>seasonal job on Monster!

>

>http://seasonal.monster.com

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>FEATURE: Confront Your Fears and Communicate

>by Paul Barada

>

>The ability to communicate effectively, especially using the spoken

>word, is one of the most essential skills any job seeker can possess.

>Employers are always looking for candidates with good communication

>skills. Learn how to improve yours here.

>http://hr.monster.com/articles/comskills/

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>THE MONSTER.COM HR CAREERS CHAT

>

>Join The HR Careers Expert and other HR pros to chat live Mondays at

>7 p.m. ET in the Events room.

>

>http://my.monster.com/mchat.asp

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>HEARD ON THE BOARDS: Ex-Employer Sabotage

>

>Monster.com member Asherf posts: I left an abusive work environment

>more than a month ago. I've applied for several jobs and gotten no

>response. I believe my former employer is behind this. I've filed a

>formal complaint, but that doesn't help.

>

>The Reference Expert responds: Control your own destiny. Identify

>three or four people you've worked with on a daily basis within the

>last...

>

>Read the rest of The Reference Expert's response:

>http://forums.monster.com/viewmessage.asp?messageid=1864272

>

>Ask The Reference Expert a question:

>http://forums.hr.monster.com/forum.asp?forum=919

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>JOB LISTINGS

>

>Are you hungry for the right opportunity? Donatos Pizza in Atlanta

>seeks a people manager for the Southeast region. Satisfy your career

>goals here.

>http://jobsearch.hr.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=13214487

>

>Put on your shades and get down to business. PacSun in Orange County,

>California, is looking for a payroll representative. Brighten your

>job search now.

>http://jobsearch.hr.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=13214116

>

>The Fairmont Hotel, located on Nob Hill in San Francisco, seeks an

>assistant director of HR. If you're interested in working at the top,

>check this out.

>http://jobsearch.hr.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=13191369

>

>Don't see your dream job listed? Don't worry -- this is just a

>sampling of the hundreds of thousands of jobs posted on Monster.com.

>Find the job you've been searching for here.

>http://hr.monster.com/jobsearch/

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>MONSTER.COM NEWSLETTERS

>

>Unsubscribe from this newsletter:

>http://my.monster.com/unsub.asp?m=43&u=20794906

>

>Subscribe to additional Monster.com newsletters:

>http://my.monster.com/newsletters.asp?mcausholli@hotmail.com

>Questions about using Monster.com: http://www.monster.com/contact/

>Post your resume: http://my.monster.com

>Advertise with us: mailto:AdOpps@monster.com (subject: sponsor)

>

>Send feedback: mailto:HR@monster.com

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Copyright 2001 TMP Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

>

>

>

>

>

>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


[IMAGE][IMAGE]
  [IMAGE] NOVEMBER 2001 Edition   Dear Richard,   Thank you for visiting LoanWeb/4Insurance. On behalf of our sister site www.iHomeowner.com , we're sending this useful iHomeowner Monthly Newsletter to you. It's specifically dedicated to the needs of Homeowners such as yourself. For much more, please visit www.iHomeowner.com , a one-stop solution for all of your homeownership needs before, during, and after the sale.  [IMAGE]    REFINANCE WITHOUT EXTENDING THE LOAN TERM  Let Us Show You How    With the lowest mortgage rates in years, now is the perfect time to refinance.  And, you don't even need to extend the term of your loan. Click here to learn more.     DECORATING: COLOR THERAPY FOR YOUR HOME  Take the Color Quiz    [IMAGE]Color says alot about you and your home.  Take the Color Quiz and find out how to use colors to give the impression you want. Click here to learn more.     REDUCE YOUR ENERGY BILLS  Quick and Easy Ways to Save    [IMAGE]Winter is around the corner, and so are higher energy bills.  Read these ideas to effectively combat those rising costs. Click here to learn more.     HOME AUTOMATION & EXTREME DESIGNS  See What the Future Holds    Home automation is advancing quickly.  Look at what's being planned and check out some extreme home designs already out there. Click here to learn more.     HOME IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CALCULATORS  Automatically Calculate How Much You Need    [IMAGE]Confused about how much paint, wallpaper, insulation, etc., you'll need for your next project?  These calculators will figure it out. Click here to learn more.     GREAT SHOPPING IDEAS FOR YOUR HOME  The Best Online Deals Around    [IMAGE]Check out these incredible online deals for home-related items.  You'll love the selections and save a bundle of cash. Click here to learn more.     THANKSGIVING - FOOD & FESTIVITIES  Create the Perfect Holiday    [IMAGE]Party planning.  Turkey carving.  Leftover recipes.  We have it all.  Celebrate Thanksgiving this year without a hitch. Click here to learn more.      [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Get Your Loan at LoanWeb.com     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Find Your Homeownership Needs at iHomeowner.com     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Save Up to 35% on Your Rates at 4Insurance.com     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Browse Great Shopping Deals for Your Home     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Suggestions for Your Thanksgiving Celebration         Tell us what YOU want to read about in future editions.    Our privacy policy.      To unsubscribe to this publication, just reply to this message and put "unsubscribe" somewhere in the subject line.  You can also unsubscribe by clicking here.


j-flexx,

what you been up to dog?

alan

----- Original Message -----
From: Wolfe, Jason <Jason.Wolfe@ENRON.com>
To: Grigsby, Mike <Mike.Grigsby@ENRON.com>; Lenhart, Matthew
<Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com>; Reitmeyer, Jay <Jay.Reitmeyer@ENRON.com>;
Evans, Ted <Ted.Evans@ENRON.com>; Lisk, Daniel <Daniel.Lisk@ENRON.com>;
<eellwanger@triumphboats.com>; Lane Capron (E-mail 2)
<lane.capron@ci.boston.ma.us>; Alan Julson (E-mail) <aljulson@netzero.net>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:18 AM
Subject: FW: OOPS

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: "Cherry, Beth" <Beth.Cherry@enform.com>@ENRON
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:02 AM
> To: Lindner, Fred; Landry, Ashley; Robinson, Misty
> Cc: Wolfe, Jason
> Subject: FW: OOPS
>
>
> Beth Cherry
> ___________
> Sr. Creative Consultant
> EnFORM Technology
> 713.350.1860
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From
> >Subject: Fwd: FW: Fw: OOPS
> >Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:51:41 -0500
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp <<mailto:veronicacherry@hotmail.com>>
>
>
>  - ATT01044.htm
>  - priceless.jpg
 <<priceless.jpg>>  <<http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


<<NPSPHis.xls>> Kate here is the History for NP15 and SP15, I believe you
should have the most recent information it is on the -emails.
If you have any questions you can call me.

Regards,
Jennifer Jones
609-520-4452

 - NPSPHis.xls


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey Bolton/HOU/EES on 09/22/2000 07:08
PM ---------------------------

"Suzanne Tegen" <stegen@resource-solutions.org> on 09/20/2000 06:18:08 PM
To: "Paul Jones" <pajones@newwestenergy.com>, "karen norris"
<norris@GMER.com>, "Jean Wilson" <jean.wilson@pacificorp.com>, "Albert
Davies" <adavies@enron.com>, "Kevin McCutcheon" <kmccutch@enron.com>, "Stacey
Bolton" <sbolton@enron.com>, "Al Ingram" <aeingram1@bpa.gov>, "Barrett
Stambler" <barrett.stambler@pacificorp.com>, "Bud Beebe" <bbeebe@smud.org>,
"dan lieberman" <danlieberman@utility.com>, "Janel Guerro (Enron Corp.)"
<jguerrer@enron.com>, "Jay Goth" <jgoth@powersavers.com>, "Jennifer
chamberlin" <jennifer.chamberlin@pgees.com>, "Julie Blunden"
<blunden@greenmountain.com>, "rick counihan"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Rick Kohl" <rkohl@prefenergy.com>,
"Stephen Huntoon" <huntoon@home.com>, <rmaddox@ctco-op.com>,
<eileen.dudley@greenmountain.com>, "Jerri Brown (GMER)" <brown@GMER.com>,
"Brian Killkelley" <killkelley@greenmountain.com>, "Tom Rawls (GMER)"
<rawls@GMER.com>, "scott mccorry" <mackesgrp@email.msn.com>, "Nadia Adawi"
<Nsadawi@aol.com>, "ZMatt Freedman" <freedman@turn.org>, "Sheryl Carter"
<scarter@nrdc.org>, "Liz Robinson" <lizrob@libertynet.org>, "karl Rabago"
<rabago@rmi.org>, "john white" <info@ceert.org>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (IEP)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Dan Kirshner" <dank@environmentaldefense.org>, "Blake
Early" <bearly@lungusadc.org>, "Bill Spratley" <was@spratley.com>, "Allan
Nogee" <anogee@ucsusa.org>, "Bob Lane" <bob.lane@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Liz Robinson"
<lizrob@ecasavesenergy.org>
cc:
Subject: 1999 Green-e Verification Press Release

All,

1999 proves to be another successful year for Green-e, thanks to all of you.
The press release about the Green-e 1999 Verification Report is attached and
can also be viewed on our website at:

http://www.green-e.org/media/pr/99verification.html

Suzanne Tegen

Center for Resource Solutions
Presidio Blg 49
PO Box 29512
San Francisco, CA 94129
415 561-2100
fax  561-2105
****************
Switch your home and office to renewable power!
See www.green-e.org

 - 1999 Verification.doc


What have you decided about Dow going forward?  Please call.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/26/99 10:11
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary G Gosnell                           07/24/99 10:17 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dow Chemical Company

Willie received a call from Mike Billings, the trader at Dow,
and he requested that deal #EY0963.1 from 6/15/99 be revised
from Dow Hydrocarbons to Dow Chemical.

He is currently signing and sending back the other trades that were
changed.

Is it okay to change this deal also, and on a "going forward" basis, all
trades must be through Dow Hydrocarbons...

let me know...thanks...mgg


A way to reflect on what is really important.  I love all of you very much.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Evans
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:41 AM
To: Everyone
Subject: FW: Thoughts from me to you.....

This really makes you think.  Take a look.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Evans [mailto:KenE@lakesideind.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:36 AM
To: 'Judye@fsgllc.com'
Subject: FW: Thoughts from me to you.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Marshall
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 7:13 AM
To: Corporate Office
Subject: FW: Thoughts from me to you.....

-----Original Message-----
From: denjo7 [mailto:denjo7@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Wren, ward; Watkins, bill/nancy; Selset/ron-sharon; Scheef, cary;
Ryan Sweet; Roehl, dennis/Joie; Parks, bonnie/bill; Olbu, Dee/Leo;
Mclean, Karin; Lycan, Norma J/Bob; Lindall, Barb; Foushee, jackie; Fabs;
Dye, sheila/steve; Clayton, Ernest O; Burdette, Jay; Alice/art; Hegna,
Paul/Alice
Subject: Fw: Thoughts from me to you.....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roehl, Linda CLK-STAFF" <roehll@issaquah.wednet.edu>
To: "linda @hotmail (E-mail)" <ljroehl58@hotmail.com>; "Denny and Joie
(E-mail)" <denjo7@email.msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: FW: Thoughts from me to you.....

>
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: Meredith-Shapiro, Renee    AD
> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:12 PM
> > To: 'Betsy At Work'; 'Bob Ramsey'; 'Donna at home'; 'Kay Dudley'; 'Ken
> > Boone'; 'Larry Marks'; Aahl, Terri           SS Staff; Barbara McBride;
> > Bohall, Fran         MMS-STAFF; Caley, Hollie           CR-Sec;
> > Clausius,Jane DSC-STAFF; Dodd, Cherie          AP STAFF; Foote, Cathie
> > IHS-STAFF; Garvey, Andrea  CH; Hopman, Carol        SH-STAFF; Hunley,
Dawn
> > IVE-Staff; Kathy Schroeder; Linda Symons; Pike, Sandie
IMS-STAFF;
> > Rackers, Anne      BLMS-STAFF; Roehl, Linda         CLK-STAFF; RoeJean
> > Grant; Sholberg, Barbara    MH-STAFF; Simpson, Judy       PLMS-STAFF;
> > Thompson, Cyndi      EN-STAFF; Wakkuri, Charlene BW-Staff; Cathy Halton;
> > Karen Miller; Myers, Rucey C; Nancy Jackson
> > Subject: FW: Thoughts from me to you.....
> >
> >
> >
> >  <<TodayOnly.pps>>
>


Membership:  Please remember that we have commitments to our  philanthropies even though you may have completed your hours.  We are in  need for people to sign up for:
KEEP PACE TRANSITION NIGHT
Tuesday,  January 29; 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Call Jane Price at 281-587-1990
Atria Retirement Home - Bingo and Painting, Call Diana Denton for dates  (281-370-6765).

-Claire  Loria


Thanks Ann.  Pls send to me going forward (at least as long as we're here).

-----Original Message-----
From: Schmidt, Ann M.
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:09 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: Restructuring Today Tuesday December 4 2001

Hey Jim,

In case you still wanted to read this publication.  I am sending this to you now because I feel if King Publishing wants to sue at this point they can go ahead and make their case with all the others.  Enjoy. A.

-----Original Message-----
From: U.S. Publishing Co. [mailto:daily@restructuringtoday.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:55 PM
To: RT Reader
Subject: Restructuring Today Tuesday December 4 2001

(see attached file:  rt011204.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
U.S. Publishing Co.
1-800-486-8201


Further to our conversation here is the GISB draft for your review.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041702.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Notice No. 00-387
November 9, 2000

TO:  NYMEX Division Members

FROM:  The Board of Directors

RE:  Termination of Members Retention and Retirement Plan

As you have been previously advised, on Wednesday, October 4, 2000 the
Board of Directors voted unanimously to terminate the New York
Mercantile Exchange Members Retention and Retirement Plan (the Plan)
conditioned upon the Exchange receiving a satisfactory Private Letter
Ruling from the IRS in connection with the Exchange's pending
demutualization plan.  On October 17, 2000, the Exchange held an open
members meeting to discuss the termination of the Plan and to answer
any questions.  At the meeting, a number of members requested that the
Board review its decision to use the 8.5% discount rate recommended by
Deloitte & Touche in connection with termination of the Plan.  At the
members meeting, it was agreed that the Board would review the
discount rate issue again at its next regular meeting.

Following the members meeting, the Exchange obtained two additional
professional opinions from actuaries.  One opinion stated that the
appropriate range of discount rates that should be used in terminating
the Plan should be between 7.8% and 8.1% and recommended using a
discount rate of 8.0%.  The third opinion recommended that the
appropriate range should be between 7.47% and 8.32% depending upon
various credit and other related actuarial issues.  Each of the
actuaries (including Deloitte & Touche) attended the Board meeting on
November 2, 2000 to present the rationale in support of their
respective recommendations and to answer any questions posed by
members of the Board.

The Board was advised by the Exchange's General Counsel, as well as by
two independent outside counsels, that in order to avoid even the
appearance of a conflict of interest, the Board should delegate
authority to choose an appropriate discount rate to a committee of
Directors who do not have any financial interest in the Plan.  The
Board passed a resolution in which it approved the recommendation of
its Counsel and delegated authority to select an appropriate discount
rate to a special committee (the Committee) composed of five Directors
who did not have an interest in the Plan.

After the Board formed the Committee, the members of the Committee,
the actuaries and the legal advisors left the room to discuss the
matter privately.  After thoroughly reviewing the matter, the
Committee returned and unanimously resolved and determined that the
appropriate discount rate that should be used in connection with the
termination of the Plan is 8.0%.

On October 23, 2000, the Exchange received a satisfactory Private
Letter Ruling from the IRS.  At its meeting on November 2, 2000, the
Board set a target closing date of November 15, 2000 for the
demutualization transaction.

Eligible participants of the Plan who are members at the time of the
closing of demutualization will receive service credit under the plan
through December 31, 2000.  All other rules regarding eligibility and
continuous service requirements will be applied according to the terms
and conditions set forth in the Plan.

Under the terms of the Plan, in the event of termination, Qualified
Participants (i.e. those participants with at least 15 years of
Continuous Service, as defined in the Plan) are entitled to a payout
equal to the net present value (NPV) of the scheduled ten-year benefit
payment that they would otherwise have received if the Plan had not
terminated, to the extent of the assets held in trust for this
purpose.  If there are remaining assets in trust after making payment
to the Qualified Participants, those remaining assets are to be
distributed to participants with Continuous Service (as defined in the
Plan) between 10 years and 14 years.  These 10 - 14 year participants
are entitled to the NPV of a fraction of the benefits they would have
received had the Plan remained in place until their normal retirement
age; the numerator of the fraction is the number of whole years of
Continuous Service and the denominator is 15.  If there are not
sufficient assets to pay each 10 -14 year participant their calculated
sums, then each 10 - 14 year participant will receive a pro rata
distribution.  These 10 - 14 year  participants must be members of
record at the time of the closing of demutualization in order to be
eligible to receive any distribution.

The Exchange is reviewing the census data and other pertinent
considerations with its actuaries, and all preliminary calculations
should be regarded as tentative and subject to change pending the
results of that review.  At this time, the Board believes that there
are sufficient assets to pay each Qualified Participant his or her
lump-sum benefit, based upon the approved a discount rate of 8.0%.  At
this time, it appears that after making payments to Qualified
Participants, the remaining assets will be sufficient to provide pro
rata benefits to 10 - 14 year participants.  10 - 14 year participants
can calculate their approximate distribution amount by multiplying the
NPV benefit of their corresponding age (see attached Schedule) by the
fraction of their whole years of service (10/15, 11/15, 12/15, 13/15,
or 14/15) by twenty-six (26%) (which at this time appears to be the
approximate  percentage of "remaining assets" available compared to
the total of all partial benefits otherwise calculated).

Qualified Participants who are already receiving benefits received
their last quarterly payment in October 2000.  Remaining obligations
to such participants will be valued in the same manner as other
Qualified Participants.

It is anticipated that actual payouts under the termination procedure
will be made in mid-January 2001.

As of December 31, 2000 it is expected that total Plan assets will be
approximately $33.5 million.  Regardless of the discount rate used,
100% of the assets of the Plan will be distributed.  Using a discount
rate of 8.0% the Qualified Participants will receive approximately $30
million or ninety percent (90%) of the total Plan assets and 10 - 14
year participants will receive the balance.

For illustrative purposes, and subject to the conditions noted above,
the attached Schedule represents an approximation of the anticipated
lump-sum payment to a Qualified Participant who has reached the age
indicated (but who has not yet begun receiving quarterly benefits) as
of December 31, 2000.

In the event that any member has any questions in connection with
termination of the Plan, please contact Chris Bowen at 299-2200 or
Suellen Galish at 299-2215.  Copies of  both the original and amended
Plans are available.

Separate But Related Matter

Contrary to erroneous information which has been disseminated by
others, neither the original Members Retention and Retirement Plan nor
the amended Plan provides for member votes on amendments.  In
accordance with Section 8 of the original Plan, in 1997 the amended
Plan was approved by a three fourths (3/4) vote of the Board.  Section
8 of both the original and amended Plan provides that "the Board of
Directors of NYMEX may at anytime, amend or terminate this Plan in
whole or in part, upon the affirmative vote of three fourths (3/4) of
the entire Board".  Section 8 of the Plan further specifically
describes how the Plan assets are to be distributed in the event of
termination.  Section 8(C) (1) states that the net present value of
lump sum termination payments shall be "calculated by using the
applicable interest rate determined by the Board in its sole
discretion, in good faith, and such determination shall be conclusive
and binding on all parties".  Section 11, entitled Authorization of
the Plan and which remains unchanged  from the original Plan, only
applies to the original authorization of the Plan which occurred in
1990.

Again, contrary to erroneous assertions that have been made, neither
the original Plan nor the amended Plan makes any reference to a specific
discount rate that should be used in calculating NPV.  In fact, the estates
of two deceased former members
(Mel Miller and Leon Grappel) that erroneously have been reported to
have received lump sum payments based upon a discount rate of 6.0%
actually received payments based upon discount rates of  7.4% (paid in
1992) and 7.2% (paid in 1993), respectively.

Inaccurate contentions and allegations diminish and undermine what we
are seeking to achieve as a global financial institution.

Attachment

Age @ 12/31/00   NPV Benefit (8.0% discount)

59.5     $204,100
58.5       194,600
57.5       185,600
56.5       177,000
55.5       168,800
54.5       161,000
53.5       153,600
52.5       146,500
51.5       139,700
50.5       133,200
49.5       127,000
48.5       121,200
47.5       115,600
46.5       110,200
45.5       105,100
44.5       100,200
43.5         95,600
42.5         91,200
41.5         87,000
40.5         82,900
39.5         79,100
38.5         75,400
37.5         71,900
36.5         68,600
35.5         65,400
34.5         62,400
33.5         59,500
32.5         56,800
31.5         54,100
30.5         51,600

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-387)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Jim,

Process seems to working fine.  Payments getting made.

One question, the calculation is running 6 days of financial assurance required, rather than 3.  Is this just because of the holiday and weekend or have they changed the calculation requirement?

Thanks

Wade

-----Original Message-----
From: Francoeur, Ellen
Sent: Thu 12/27/2001 9:49 AM
To: Stubblefield, Wade; Nettelton, Marcus
Cc: Gulluni, Maria; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Arnold, Cheryl; McDonough, Linda
Subject: Enron Daily Notice

 <<Daily Notice - 12_27_01 EEMC.doc>>  <<Daily Notice - 12_27_01 EESI.doc>>


It is with sadness and regret that we announce that Cliff Baxter is resigning
as an employee of Enron.  We are happy, though, that Cliff,s primary reason
for resigning is to spend more time with his family.

Cliff is a unique talent.  His creativity, intelligence, sense of humor, and
straightforward manner have been assets to the company throughout his
career.  He will be missed.

Cliff joined Enron in 1991 and was a key member of the team that built Enron,
s wholesale business.  Before becoming Vice Chairman of Enron, Cliff served
in a variety of positions in Enron,s wholesale businesses, culminating in his
appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Enron North America in
1999.

We have asked Cliff, and he has agreed, to continue in a consulting role for
the company while concluding negotiations on a number of key asset
dispositions.

Please join us in thanking Cliff for his service to the company and in
wishing him the very best.


up or down what

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

okay...up or down???

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you are supposed to ask up or down

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Sounds good to me!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

going across the street

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

so what are we doing tonight?


I'll send you the final doc's so we can discuss.  I generated the forms, then
finance and the banks commented on the forms.

Kay

Karen E Jones@ECT
01/23/2001 12:49 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TURBOPARK STUFF/CA Development I and II notice of exercise of
purchase option

Hi Kay.  How are things??  I'm trying to educate myself (always a scary
proposition) on moving equipment out of TurboPark, since hopefully we will
have the need to do that soon for Pastoria.  Any further thinking on the
whole topic beyond what you've provided below?  Like where I can find forms
of the B of S and Assignment docs?  And, did you do the docs, or does finance
(I kind of assume we take the laboring oar on all of these, but thought I'd
see what your experience proved to be).  Please give me a ring when
convenient.  Thanks.

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/03/2001 07:03 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TURBOPARK STUFF/CA Development I and II notice of exercise of
purchase option

I am working on a deal to move TurboPark equipment into Enron owned LLC's,
with a simultaneous sale of  80% of the equity to a third party.  This deal
is supposed to close by Jan 15, so I'm getting a crash course on TurboPark
and how to get stuff out of it during the early phase.  I thought I would
share what I'm learning, if nothing else as a form of therapy.

Attached to the email is what I believe to be the proper form of notice to
take something out of TurboPark.  Five to fifteen business days' notice is
required.

There will be other documents involved as well:

Bill of Sale
Assignment and Assumption Agreement
UCC releases, if applicable (UCC filings are made on all delivered equipment)

I suspect a consent by the equipment seller may also be required.  More to
come on this one.

As I learn more about the process I will keep you advised.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/03/2001 08:52
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 08:28 AM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: CA Development I and II notice of exercise of purchase option

I am attaching a revised draft notice of intent to exercise the purchase
option for the equipment for the CA transactions. We need two separate
notices - one for CA I and one for CA II.  Ben/Fred/Rebecca, could you please
prepare a draft of the two exhibits?

Lisa/Catherine/Rose, I revised the form of notice to make it track the
participation agreement and the development and construction management
agreement.

I've tentatively dated the notice as of this Friday.  By my calculations,
Monday is our drop dead date since a waiver of the 5 day period is not an
option, and the deal dies if not closed by the 15th.

Ben mentioned that I should be drafting a "release letter" for the banks
and/or DevCo. It would be a big help if someone could point me to the section
in the documents which set forth the requirements of the release, since I'm
still wading through it all and haven't found the relevant language yet.
Also, please advise of the results of the conference call which you had with
the lenders (?) and/or their lawyers regarding the issue.

I am working on the assignment and assumption agreement.

Thanks,

Kay


FYI - We agree with the 17.500

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 11:51:38 AM

To:   Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01

Have spoken w/ both gas controls (HPL/DEFS) and will agree with your
17,500.

                    "Melissa
                    Jones"               To:     "Eileen Ponton"
<kponton@duke-energy.com>
                    <mjones7@txu.        cc:     "David Avila"
<davila1@txu.com>, "Charlie Stone"
                    com>                 <cstone1@txu.com>
                                         bcc:
                    03/08/01             Subject:     Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW
FOR
03/07/01
                    09:27 AM

We disagree.  We show 17.500, that was 0200 to 0900 @  60 rate which equals
17.500

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 10:56:39 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU,
Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01

Per my gas control, Tufco went to 60,000 at midnight and reduced to 45,000
at 3:00 am due to PG&E having a compressor down.  Nom rate calculated on 3
hrs at 60,000 and 6 hrs at 45,000.  Please let me know if you have heard
differently.

DATE      NOM       FLOW - MCF           FLOW - MMBTU

3/07      18,750         14,140               14,522

BTU = 1.027


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 12:49 PM -----

	Fred Kelly@EES
	05/10/2001 12:44 PM

		 To: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jay
Ferry/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, David Sweitzer
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jay Ferry/HOU/EES@EES,
David Hart/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: FW: Paths of influence

Dirk/Jay - thanks for the quick response.  I want to insure we have
accurately portrayed the situation to you both (the real duration of our
requests, and the real response time of the utilities).  Don't want anyone to
walk into a response of "..... we've only had that request for XX days....".
We do need help though if we want to achieve our aggressive schedule.

We are falling behind our target schedule due to a lack of pulse meter
contact installations.  How hard would it be to get informal org charts for
the metering side of SCE, SDGE, and PGE (just simple bob works for jim who
works for tom who reports to bill), and......, to identify who (within
Enron/CEC/ISO) has the relationship(s) with those groups?

The execution side of the boxter effort asked Jay who they could talk to to
insure we were working "smart" in California with respect to getting interval
meters modified to include pulse contacts.  The execution team wants to
insure that we aren't standing in the wrong long line.  We want to know who
we could/should call to express our "appreciation" for all their cooperation,
and to insure they knew our aggressive timetable.   How many times have
you/we heard "........ oh....., that's what you are doing....., if someone
had just called me........, I could have........".

The request for "contacts" (and to know the metering org chart inside each of
these three utilities) was so we could attempt to penetrate those three org's
(SCE, SDGE, PG&E) at the optimum level.  Additionally - if we have acct mgmt
folks that have relationships - we want to leverage those.

Tom - can you provide to those listed above the short exec summary of what we
have requested from SDGE, SCE, PGE, and...., what their response has been
(use the attached XLS chart).  Help charactarize when we officially made
request, so that we provide an accurate perception of the three utility's
responses.

Thx

From: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on 05/10/2001
11:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Fred Kelly/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Paths of influence

Jeff, we are rolling out a CEC/CALISO curtailment initiative in California
that provides major benefits to our customers. Before the program can be
implemented, customer facilities need to be equipped with a pulse generating
meter (a modified version of a regular meter). As we are no longer the MSP we
now have to rely on the UDCs to install these meters. We fully expect to pay
for these installations but we are getting major push back in SCE and PG&E
territory with respect to scheduling these installations. If we were to go by
PG&E's schedule (12 weeks), the summer will be over and most benefits will be
lost.

We are under the impression that Enron is plain dirt in the eyes of the UDC
employees, and we are being singled out by the rank and file folks as the
major culprit for the energy crisis. However primitive that opinion is, we
are stuck with it. Please note Jay Ferry's contention below.

Is there a way for you to nudge some UDC executives and ask them to instruct
their field crews to start cooperating?  We could use the help.

Dirk A. van Ulden
Director, Account Services
Enron Energy Services, Northwest Region
(925) 543-3879
2-way pager 877-680-9472
Fax (925) 543-3550
dirk_vanulden@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Ferry,Jay
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:32 AM
To: vanUlden, Dirk
Subject: Paths of influence

Dirk,

We have been working with Mike Connaly and his boss, Mel Calais, at SCE to
expedite deployment of pulse meters.  Do you know the chain of command there
and if there is anyone higher that we could call if work continues to move
along at a snail's pace.  Please call me (713-646-7086) or respond by e-mail,
if you can't reach me.

Thanks,
j


Melissa:  Brant Reves has just confirmed for me that financial power deals in
the name of Aquila will change to Utilicorp United Inc. when the ISDA Master
is signed (any day now).  Of course, the confirm will be an ISDA confirm, as
well.   SS


I took a brief look at the ABN guaranty--while not as offensive as many,
there are several policy issues, including the fact that there is not a
limitation on consequential damages, and that it does not have pay after 5
days language that is, in a word essential. While I hate to start a battle of
forms, I would recommend sending ABN the standard trading guaranty.

Sarah Wesner
06/28/2000 09:37 AM
To: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ed Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Margin Lines

Good news.

ABN Amro told us yesterday that they want to pursue this line and have it
closed by the end of the week.  They asked us to send them a copy of the
documentation where it stands up to now.  They gave us a copy of their
mark-up of the Corp Guarantee which I gave to all of you.  ABN is motivated
to get this done and will be amenable on pricing.

Bank One talked to Jeff Shankman last night and has agreed to an effective
rate of 0 for the initial margin.  They will charge us FF+30 but will
reimburse us at FF+30 for any cash margins (see Schedule 1.)  Also Bank One
will charge $2.55 a side for the commission ($5.10 total.)  Jeff told Bank
One that ENE recently decided to pay all of its brokers the same fee
(explains discrepancy between documentation and commission quotes from
trading floor.)  As for the variation margin, the charge will be FF+30.  Bank
One has  documents:
Customer Agreement - amendments will be made to Schedule 1 to reflect newly
proposed commercial terms.
Enron Corp. Guaranty - Bank One needs to discuss Joel's request for Enron
standard documentation
Credit line document - Jason/Sara need to make any necessary comments
Master Note (Promissory note) - NY law/jurisdiction will be acceptable.  Bank
One needs to discuss Joel's' request for standard Enron documentation.

Let's get together today so that we can organise ourselves to get our
comments to the docs consolidated and close these as quickly and efficiently
as possible.

Thanks, Sarah


I've just been invited to a couple of meetings on Friday PM--the kind of
meetings where the word "invited" is used humorously.  I think I'm still
clear after 4:00 pm Omaha time so could be dialed in after then if it would
be useful.  Sorry to be such a pain inthe ass but getting fired would be a
real inconvenience right now so I'd better post at these meetings.  I'll have
Martha coordinate with you guys.


Bjorn,

Vince forwarded your message to me.

I think it is a relatively easy task to achieve the synchronization with Houston's Exotica Options Library.
Just install Houston's Exotica.xll in London office, which will not take more than one hour.
We can routinely ship the excutable whenever we update the library for installation in London.

There are good reasons to do this:

1)  We make changes to Exotica frequently. In this sense, it is very hard to keep
ONE version across the company if offices outside Houston want to maintain their own
version.

2)  It is not necessary and cost effective to maintain different versions. As matter of fact, it is harmful
to have different versions. At the end of the day, it is Enron's P/L, different versions of Exotica would
produce a small difference in per unit basis, however, this difference could  be amplified to
a large discrepency due to the large trade volumes.

3) The London research plans to rewrite Exotica in C++. In our view, Exotica's routine is
small and self-contained, the objective programming will not add much value to it. While
it is nice to have a C++ version, but we think it should be assigned a low priority. We
are not moving to C++ any time soon in Houston.

Let me know if this answers your question. My phone number is 713-853-6388.

Zimin Lu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 1:00 PM
To:	Hagelmann, Bjorn
Cc:	Lu, Zimin; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Exotica's different versions

Bjorn,

I don't think the scope of the project is really that big. When we looked
into it, it seemed like a relatively minor issue.

To me, it's  really a matter of routine maintenance that should not be
an equivalent of a Desert Storm operation.

Zimin and I will call Slava on Tuesday and determine what has to be done.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hagelmann, Bjorn
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Murphy, Ted; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: Exotica's different versions

Vince:

We had discussed this briefly before I went on vacation. What did you want to do with this?

Regards

Bj?rn Hagelmann
Director
Rac - Market Risk Management
E-Mail: bjorn.hagelmann@enron.com
Office:  + 1 713 345 7984
Mobil:   + 1 713 302 5279

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Danilov, Viacheslav
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 02:25
To:	Hagelmann, Bjorn
Cc:	Nath, Tani; Gibner, Stinson
Subject:	Exotica's different versions

Hi Bjorn,

some time ago we, you, Stinson and I, had a meeting in Houston regarding having the same versions for Houston and London.

We agreed that you would talk to Ted Murphy to get his support for this project. I know that Ted did not come to Houston at the time he planned and therefore you were not able to talk to him (you were on holidays when he came to Houston).

This project is really big (several man month work) and we cannot do this without Ted's support. You know that requests from RAC are always taken very seriously.

Please, could you talk to Ted to get his support.

many thanks,

Slava


March 2000 or March 2001?

To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com@ENRON,
flombar@columbiaenergygroup.com@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: International Paper/Union Camp - PLEASE READ

One correction:  It is our understanding that we will nominate this contract
until March 2000, not until the fuel management responsibilities expire in
2002, unless we are successful in negotiating an extension of the ENA/CES
Retail alliance beyond March 2000.

Joan Veselack@ENRON
02/16/2000 02:36 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com,
flombar@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: International Paper/Union Camp - PLEASE READ

To ensure everyone is on the same page. International Paper/Union Camp
contract expires with CES Retail to perform the Fuel Management Duties in
2002. Fred Lombardo has been handling the fuel management responsibilities
from Pittsburgh and will leave CES at the end of February. CES is outsourcing
these management responsibilities to Alliance Energy Services. CES has a term
supply contract with Enron for 6900 delivered to Union Camp and this expires
at the end of March 2000. CES is in agreement that Enron will continue to
nominate this gas until the end of March 2000.

The Contract signed between CES and Enron, states that ENA has the agency
rights for the International Paper Contract.

Enron's understanding is that Enron will continue to nominate this contract
until CES's fuel management responsibilities expire in 2002. Colleen and
Melissa, please ensure both companies are on the same page. Fred Lomabardo
and his boss, Don Deal, were going to outsource the nomination rights of this
contract to Alliance Energy. This is not allowed per the Contract language.

In addition, Union Camp does not want to sign the agency agreement required
by TCO, because it is vague. Enron needs this agreement signed so we can
nominate the gas under Enron's accounts on TCO. We need CES's help in getting
this matter resolved ASAP.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/25/2000
07:12 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger@ECT
08/24/2000 06:04 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SDG&E

Steve,

SDG&E came out with the attached RFP for fixed price power.  They are
requesting proposals for several standard blocks through 12/03.  Responses
are due August 30.  ENA/EPMI will be prepared to respond, if appropriate.  In
the meantime, we continue to price the full requirements residential
structure and await any news from the governor's office/legislature.  I can
be reached at 503-464-3735.

Regards,

Chris


Can do- will get back to you in a few days w/ more details. Thanks.

From: Mark E Haedicke@ECT on 09/26/2000 02:50 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: The Anti-trust Seminars

Rick:  I would like to have a presentation on local rules such as ISO rules
in the various locations where we operate.  Can your group do this as we work
on the legal presentations.  I believe this is already happening in part, but
I would like to make more institutionalized.  Let me know.   Mark

	Richard Shapiro@EES
	09/08/2000 09:42 AM

		 To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: The Anti-trust Seminars

I agree and am copying this message to Mark and Jeff- Thanks.

To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: The Anti-trust Seminars

I sent you along yesterday a copy of the e-mail re the participation by Rob
and me in the seminars that Blakes is doing for the traders and originators
in Canada.  Thinking about it more this morning, I am wondering whether the
seminars that Sullivan & Cromwell are doing in the US are too narrow in
their  focus.  That is, it is important for traders not merely to understand
the competition/anti-trust rules but also  the rules and practices of the
market surveillance panels or committees that operate, I think, in each of
the ISO jurisdictions.   It is that piece that Rob and I will be  trying to
add in Canada.  Just a thought in case you want to raise it withJeff Hodge or
Mark Haedicke.


Thanks for the dinners, and the breakfast, and the company.  It was fun.  And
don't get cranky, but I'm going to be in and out of things this weekend since
I have midterms Monday and Tuesday.  Likely means that I'll be studying in
Berkeley and SF during the days on Sat and Sun but will be present for the
evenings.  H0pe that works.

Kisses,
Jeff

PS I'm trying, lord knows I'm trying, to stay out of it, but it's going to
start raining up at the Dome very, very soon.......


Im fine with it.
m

From: Shanna Funkhouser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 03:28 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Health Clubs -- NY

Jeff and Mike,

Some of our employees in NY have asked whether we would be offering the same
Health Club reimbursement as what Enron Metals offers in NY.

Ultimately, it is a business cost, not an HR decision.  Metals reimburses up
to $500/year which seems very reasonable.

I think it would be good to offer this to even the playing field with Houston
based employees.

Thanks,
Shanna


note the attached Heating Oil inventory graph.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 05:47 AM
---------------------------

John Griffith@ENRON
10/10/2000 06:21 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: API and API Crude, Distillate & Unleaded Stocks Graphs

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000
06:20 PM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 10/10/2000 06:11:56 PM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:

Subject: API and API Crude, Distillate & Unleaded Stocks Graphs

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: UnleadedStocks.pdf)(See attached file: CrudeStocks.pdf)
(See attached file: HeatingOilStocks.pdf)(See attached file:
PADDIIstocksCL.pdf)(See attached file: PADDIstocksHO.pdf)(See attached
file: PADDIstocksHU.pdf)(See attached file: API.pdf)
 - UnleadedStocks.pdf
 - CrudeStocks.pdf
 - HeatingOilStocks.pdf
 - PADDIIstocksCL.pdf
 - PADDIstocksHO.pdf
 - PADDIstocksHU.pdf
 - API.pdf


Thanks for the clarification Vince I appreciate it. We have a significant
resource problem here in India, given we have a renegotiation about fall in
our laps. Anshuman is one of our key analysts and we are very proud of his
abilities and future potential for Enron. Once we have Dabhol off the "life
support system" we could look at a longer assignment. As far as the present
one month assignment is concerned, I would rather go for an early start say
5th Feb till 5th March. Is this convenient to you and Jeff.
Neil

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/24/2001 10:41 PM
To: Neil McGregor/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandeep
Kohli@Enron

Subject: Anshuman

Neil,

I would like to apologize for the confusion regarding Anshuman.
We have floated a number of possible scenarios regarding his
trip to Houston and there was a lot of confusion
regarding the terms (given that I was talking to Sandeep
every few days).

Currently, we expect Anshuman to come   to Houston for one month
to work on the DPC  project (at Jeff Shankman's request). The lawyers advised
me that we need an L1  visa  for him, irrespective of the duration
of  his stay.

Sorry for the confusion.

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: (713) 853 3848
Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


The Annual Compliance Meeting has been rescheduled for November 8, 2001 from 8:30 to 10:00 at the Doubletree Hotel, LaSalle Room B.  I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused you.   Please change your calendars and we will see you on November 8th.  Thank you and if you have any questions, please call me at ext. 31939.

Donna Lowry
Sr. Director
RAC Compliance
(713) 853-1939
(713) 646-4039 fax


Re:  Clarksdale see below.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 01:46 PM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	05/11/2001 05:04 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale  Master Gas Agreements

Attached are drafts of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for gas.  Upon
completion of a guaranty I will incorporate a section for same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


yes

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

John,

2. Do you assume at-the-money straddles? If not, please give us deltas and
gammas. See you at 5:30 tomorrow. Vlady.

John Arnold
06/12/2000 08:47 AM
To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vlady:
In preparation for our discussion tomorrow, can you run VAR numbers for some
mini-portfolios:

Portfolio 1.   +1000 November Nymex
                -1000 December Nymex

 2.     -1000 July Nymex Straddles

 3.     +1000 July 2002 Nymex

 4.     +1000 July 2002 Nymex
         - 1000 August 2002 Nymex

 5.     +1000 July Socal Basis

 6.     +1000 July Chicago Basis
          -1000 July Michcon Basis

 7.     +1000 July Henry Hub Index

 8.     +1000 July 2003 Chicago Basis

Again, these are separate portfolios.  I'm trying to check that the VAR
numbers make logical sense.
Thanks,
John


Sorry Mike wrong address
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/28/2000 12:22 PM
To: Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Guys, lets get together to get final resolution to these issues including the
peaker fee asap.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Theresa Vos@ENRON
11/28/2000 12:00 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Warren
Schick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Attached is the Cost Summary for the 2000 Peakers with actuals thru
11/17/00.  I still have not received any cost reports from Nepco.  Please
call me if you have any questions.

thanks,
theresa
x58173


Commencing with an NHK (Japanese public TV) report and quickly spreading to
media inquiries and wire reports, earlier today a story spread through Japan
that the Enron affiliate E Power has immediate plans to build at least one
large (1000 MW) power plant.   In fact,  it appears that E Power has been
pursuing this prospect, but nothing has progressed to executive management or
board approval.   We are using the following statement to respond to media
inquiries:

Enron and its affiliates, including E Power, continuously look at a number of
projects around the world.  There is a good deal of advance preparation and
various factors that need to be evaluated before these projects can progress
forward through approvals.  Therefore, it is Enron's practice not to comment
on these projects until they reach a sufficiently advanced stage of
development to have a significant prospect for success.  Enron and/or E Power
do not have a power project in Japan which is sufficiently advanced to
warrant comment at this time.

We will keep you apprised of further significant developments.

John


Return-Path: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (rly-yg01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.1]) by
air-yg05.mail.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 18:00:52 -0500
Received: from  mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.152.140.66]) by
rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 18:00:36 -0500
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id XAA19726 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 23:00:07 GMT
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) by
dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA24406 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 86256874.007E6242 ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:26 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <86256874.007E61A1.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:29 -0600
Subject: Re: Mark-to-Market
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000
05:00
PM ---------------------------

From: Wade Cline@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 01/28/2000 07:17 AM ZE5B

To:   Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J
      Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: Mark-to-Market  (Document link: Vince J Kaminski)

Sandeep,

Can DPC sell to MSEB and have EIPL buy an equivalent amount of power from MSEB
at another spot on their grid, and then EIPL sell to the 3rd party state?

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao@ECT
01/27/2000 04:00 PM

To:   Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade
      Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  Re: Mark-to-Market  (Document link: Wade Cline)

Sandeep:
     I met with Bob today and discussed the deal structure we put together. On
the mark-to-market issue, Bob and his colleague Wess told me that as long as
payments are tied to one particular plant, we cannot m-t-m them. They had same
problem with plants here in the US (like the peaking plants) and they had to
separate the plant from power sales to be able to m-t-m the assocated
cashflows.
What they did is: they sold power from the plant to an outside party and
bought
it back from them at completely different (multiple) locations. The buyback is
not tied to any specific plant and is marked to maket. Even if Enron can
somehow
mark-to-market a deal with DPC, it can do so for only 50% of the cashflows
because only 50% of DPC is owned by outsiders.  And a simple loan to an
affiliate cannot also be marked to market.

     Bob was suggesting that if EIPL buys options from DPC and from some other
plants and in turn sells power to AP or Karnataka then we could have a case
for
m-t-m. Politically DPC selling power to EIPL may not be the best solution, to
put it rather mildly!

Our alternatives, as I see them, are
1. Do the deal as we structured it. The only difference is that Enron doesn't
mark it to market and income is      earned only in 2002-03.
2. Do the deal as we structured it. EIPL/Enron then sells the contract to
another party at a profit. The problem, of course, is finding this party and
forking part of the profit to them.
3. Same deal, except revenue securitization is done through an outside party
in
India (not EIPL).

Bob said he will think about the issues some more this week. Let me know when
you will be here next week so we can meet with Bob together. I will be going
to
Boston for Tuesday and/or Wednesday (Feb.1-2). I can book an appt. with Bob
for
us.

Sandeep Kohli@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/23/2000 09:45 PM

To:   Robert Butts, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao@ECT
cc:   Vince Kaminski, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ananda
      Mukerji, Jaiprakash Desai/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Mark-to-Market

Bob,

I wanted to continue the analysis on mark-to-market that I had spoken to you
about on the phone.

I thought that it was getting very difficult explaining the whole transaction
by
phone, so I am having Krishnarao who is in Vince's group explain the
transaction
to you.

Krishna has been helping us structure the deal here in India, and he has just
returned to Houston from India after working with the team here.

He will seek an appointment with you to explain the transaction.  I would like
you to please spend some time with him, and then based on the discussion
please
send us a note detailing how sucha a transaction would be marked to market.

Please cosider the fact that currently there are no such transactions from the
Indian side.  This is a very important transaction for us, and we may need to
repeat this in coming months, hence setting up the system to account for these
maybe well worth it.  Also, what I am concerned about is that there will be an
Enron India (EIPL) account in India based on Indian GAAP, and upon
consolidation
there will be a US GAAP accounting in the US.  It is here that we would like
to
have mark-to-market accounting.  EIPL is structured through Mauritius, and
then
Caymen Islands.

Another key question to consider is that when we m-t-m the transaction in the
US
there will be a tax accruing in the year of m-t-m (say 2000).  However, in
India, as a result of the accrual accounting, there will not be any income
showing till the year 2002 or 2003.  We will need to know how that would get
treated, and whether there is a way to get credit for the tax payable in the
US.
I am also confused about whether US tax would be levied, since none of the
income is being brought back into the US (remains overseas - subpart-F and
other
concerns).

Finally, we have been working hard in structuring a fixed price contract and
getting a fixed for floating swap in the US (this is still not allowed to
Indian
Corporates).  I need you to think about this too, and see if some type of
accounting will solve this issue.  Krishna knows what I am talking about, and
will brief you on the same.

Krishna - Please walk Bob through the three structures we had worked here.

Look forward to your help and comments.  This is going to be an exciting
project
for us all.

Regards,
Sandeep.


Heather,

I'm guessing that Peoples wants to use this form in lieu of the credit
agreement.  Maybe I'm wrong.

Kay

"Heather Brown" <hbrown@bracepatt.com> on 10/16/2000 02:11:13 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

Kay -- The attached notes look like they would be used for member loans to
Enovate under the LLC Agmt (i.e., loans for capital expenditures and other
purposes not covered by the credit facilities provided under the Credit
Agreements).   (As you'll see when you review the attachments, those notes
are non-interest bearing demand notes.)

Re:  the attached form of note -- it should work for purposes of member loans
under the LLC Agmt, but you will need to decide how the LLC Agmt loans and
the Credit Agreement's revolving loans "work" together ... i.e., can the LLC
Agmt loans be paid from cash flow that would otherwise go to pay down the
revolvers, and will they be subordinated to the revolvers?

Heather

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/16/00 01:51PM >>>
I haven't looked at this yet...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 01:51
PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Gregg Penman
 pic22646.pcx) 10/16/2000 11:48 AM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

Kay - John Nassos prepared the following form of promissory note for loans
to enovate.  Can this substitute for Bracewell's promisorry note?  Let me
know what you think.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
11:45 AM ---------------------------

j.burns@pecorp.com on 10/16/2000 10:18:38 AM

To:   Paul.Burgener@enron.com, Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

FYI and comments.  The attached would be issued for funding short-term
needs
of enovate.  Thanks

JAB

> ----------
> From:   Nassos, John G.
> Sent:   Monday, October 16, 2000 10:15 AM
> To:     Burns, Jim
> Subject:     Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.
>
> Attached pursuant to your request is a form of promissory note for member
> loans to enovate, L.L.C.  Of course, Enron needs to review it and approve
> of the form as well.  As we discussed, the note is set up as a demand
note
> that does not bear interest.
>
> Please call if you have any questions (ext. 4413).
>
>  <<Promissory Notes - shell.doc>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

(See attached file: Promissory Notes - shell.doc)


It is on like Donkey Kong.  Too bad Im going to have to "show you guys" how
its done on the golf course.  We need to get a pony keg for the pre-party.
1201 sounds good but Im afraid of that chick.
-Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.Williams.III@enron.com [mailto:Bill.Williams.III@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:50 PM
To: m.scott.kuehn@intel.com
Subject: RE: The weekend cometh

Scott,
There is a woman's exhibition game beforehand!  SWEET!  It is the Seattle
Lady Saints and the Portland Reign...Excellent.
Golf tomorrow at 8:48 at Tri-Mountain...Thayer should be coming as well.

Give me a call tonight...and how bout the 1201 tonight?

B

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Kuehn, M Scott" <m.scott.kuehn@intel.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kuehn+2C+20M+20Scott+22+20+3Cm+2Escott+2Ekuehn+40intel
+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:01 AM
   To:     Williams III, Bill
   Subject:  The weekend cometh

   Ahoy young Williams.  Where do you want to play golf on Friday?   I
   think
   something in North or East Portland would be cool.  We definitely need
   to
   get a pony keg for the bbq Friday afternoon.  The note I sent at work is
   copied below.  Only a couple people have responded.
   Later.
   -Kuehn

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Kuehn, M Scott
   Sent:   Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:56 PM
   To:     Szatkiewicz, Jason M; Staneff, Matthew A; Breuer, Lisa A;
   Nicholson,
   Bradley A; Hroncich, Timothy B; McGuire, Mike; Junker, Richard D;
   Behunin,
   Abigail J; Greenfield, Scott D; Jarman, Parry W; Tseng, Nancy H;
   Maloney,
   Paul; Bunnell, Lisa A; Lee, Ken; Corless, Preston L; Lowell, Randall W;
   Hass, Sam M; Hess, Mike J; Billa, Roberto A
   Subject:     Timbers game this Friday

   To all,
   The Portland Timbers are playing this Friday evening.  Admission is ~$5
   and
   the game starts at 7pm.  These games are a blast and it would be fun if
   we
   could get a group together.  There will be a pre-party at my house from
   5:30-7:00.  Please let me know if you would like to go.

   Also, Please forward this message to anyone else in your team that would
   be
   interested.
   Directions to my house and PGE park are attached.

   Directions to my house (we will be in the backyard):
   http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?BFCat
   =&Pyt=Tmap&newFL=Use+Address+Below&add
   r=2349+NW+Flanders&csz=Portland+OR+97210&country=us&Get%A0Map=Get+Map

   Portland Timbers/PGE Park info:
   http://www.pgepark.com/timbers/schedule.cfm

   -Scott


Richard,

Thanks for the voicemail and email.  Congrats to you also.  Hopefully we will
get a chance to work together more often.  I'll give you a call on my next
trip to London.

Mike

Richard Harper
08/01/2000 02:52 AM
To: Mike McConnell
cc:
Subject: Congratulations.

Mike, congratulations

Richard


John, attached is a brief memo for you to pass on to J. Sutton.  It address
both Ontario and Alberta.  My understanding is that the two people that Mr.
Sutton is meeting next Wednesday at the Canadian Embassy  are Jim Wilson
(Ontario Minister of Energy) and Tony Clement (Ontario Minister of the
Environment , also Minister of Municipal Affairs).  Accordingly, I suspect
that the  part on Ontario will be most relevant for Mr. Sutton's purposes.
It occurs to me that Mr. Sutton might want: a) a brief profile of each of
Wilson and Clement  (i.e there is some personal data that he may find of
interest for conversation purposes - i.e. Wilson is very proud of the fact
that his great- uncle, Father Jim Wilson, founded Little League baseball in
Houston); and b) a memo setting out some key messages which Mr. Sutton might
deliver regarding the Ontario market.  Let me know and I can get that stuff
to you on Monday to forward on.


SENT ON BEHALF OF GEORGE TOCQUIGNY

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marty Sunde                           02/08/2001 10:11 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
  888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
  EB 889

To: George Tocquigny/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Gruma's call for help, re: Cal.

George, consider Scott Gahn, Rick Shaprio or Jeff Dasovich.

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  George Tocquigny                           02/07/2001 03:55 PM

To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Gruma's call for help, re: Cal.

Marty,
I rec'd. a call from Steve Brunner this afternoon, requesting assistance from
us regarding their California situation.

Irwin Gordon just returned from Cal. and has many questions about the future
direction of California's energy environment, and what Gruma's options might
include.  Boiling it down, Irwin and his senior leadership team would like to
meet with Enron's "California expert" to talk about the current and future
scenarios, in order that Gruma can make more intelligent near-term
decisions.  They would like to do this next week if at all possible.

FYI, we have already had several conversations with Steve over the past week
pertaining to our current posture in California, and I've furnished him with
the letter we sent to our customers, and the PowerPoint slides prepared for
meetings on the subject.  While these were helpful, Gruma's response was "not
enough depth...didn't answer all of our questions."

Steve gave me a good overview of Gruma's questions and issues which I can
discuss further with you or whomever you designate to meet with Gruma.

Let me know if I can further clarify.
George


Greetings Mary Beth:

I'm touching base to see how progress is coming on the document that's being
prepared for the Governor's office.

Best,
Jeff


Pretty small stuff from a dollar standpoint.  Perhaps the sky is not falling.

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
09/22/2000 04:29 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Updated Enron Discrepancy list

This seems too small to bother with. What do you think?

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 02:40 PM
---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/22/2000 03:30 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT, Kay Mann@ENRON, Robert P Virgo@ECT, Brian
Hulse/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Mayeaux/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank R
Cervenka/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Updated Enron Discrepancy list

Ben,

Per our conversation, attached is the requested Punchlist.  The original,
estimated value to correct all the discrepancies was approximately $250,000.
After our discussions with SSEP on September 19, 2000, staffing levels and an
increased productivity correcting the discrepancies took place.  Currently,
we estimate that SSEP has about $35,000 left to correct and we expect them to
finish by September 30, 2000.  Please note that the aforementioned
description does not include the discrepancy we discovered concerning
Enclosure Area Classification relating to gas migration.  We estimate that it
will cost approximately $2,000 per unit ($48,000) to correct.  Our
engineering is looking at this now and we plan to have an answer on this next
week.

If there is any further assistance we can provide, please contact me at
713-646-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/22/2000 11:53 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Engineering & Construction Company
	From:  Frank R Cervenka                           09/21/2000 01:47 PM

To: armstrongm604@cs.com
cc: Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: Updated Enron Discrepancy list


Please handle this.  Call me with any questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 02:21 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
12/29/2000 06:58 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Additional Public Record Act request for informatio n
provided by the ISO to the CPUC

Mary,

Any direction you can provide on how to handle would be appreciated.  I think
any response is due 1/10.

GAC
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 12/29/2000 06:58
AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
12/28/2000 12:25 PM
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, mday@gmssr.com, gfergus@brobeck.com
cc:

Subject: CAISO Notice: Additional Public Record Act request for informatio n
provided by the ISO to the CPUC

Here is another one.  Pklant to send any letters re this one -- mary hain had
done so in the past, I believe.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/28/2000 12:22 PM -----

	"Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>
	Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
	12/27/2000 04:53 PM
	Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne"

		 To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO Notice: Additional Public Record Act request for informatio n
provided by the ISO to the CPUC

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

On December 19 the CPUC received a second Public Record Act request for
information provided by the ISO to the CPUC which may include information
subject to ISO tariff section 20.3.  This request was forwarded to the ISO
today by the CPUC.  Attached please find the Public Record Act request and
the letter from the CPUC providing that any comments from the ISO regarding
the request must be submitted to the CPUC by no later than January 10, 2001.
Market Participants wishing to provide comments to the CPUC on the request
should submit such comments directly to the CPUC in accordance with the
instructions in the attached December 27 letter from the CPUC.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.


Lorraine:  here's what we would have to show FERC, along with some of my
comments.  Let me know if you have additional ideas, and I'll turn it into a
draft to send around to the usual suspects.

1.  Rate impact on TW customers; method by which TW would collect the costs
of the acquired capacity.

 -  I assume TW would be at risk for any undercollection of revenue
associated with the PNM capacity; thus there is no cost-shift potential to
other shippers.
 - Net costs will be separately recorded.

2.  Would acquisition of PNM capacity enable TW to gain control over access
to upstream capacity and supply sources in a manner which would permit TW to
limit customer choices or improperly tie use of the acquired capacity to
other pipeline services?  (I think Mary Kay will be able to help us explain
the "no tying" part).

3.  Would TW's marketing affiliates receive preferential treatment?

 - No TW marketing affiliate will be involved in the proposed transaction
 - Acquisition of PNM capacity will not result in any undue preference or
advantage to any affiliated entity.

4.  Will TW as a holder of capacity receive preferential treatment over PNM's
customers, to the detriment of PNM's customers?

 - No.  PNM will be making the capacity available to TW only during periods
in which it has unused capacity available on its system, so any impact on PNM
shippers should be minimal.
 - Service contract under PNM's tariff does not provide for unduly
preferential treatment of TW.

5.  How will capacity be managed or otherwise integrated into TW's existing
open access operations?

 - TW will enter into service agreements with PNM from time to time to
transport gas on the portion of PNM's line from Blanco, NM (i.e., the Blanco
Hub operated by TW) to Rio Puerco, NM, where PNM's system interconnects with
TW's mainline.  Resulting available capacity will be posted according to TW's
tariff.
 - The capacity will be used to serve customers under TW's FTS-1, LFT and ITS
(right?) rate schedules from the Blanco receipt point to delivery points on
TW's system.
 - Lorraine -- we need to discuss our arrangement with PNM -- Would we be
able to acquire on an as-needed basis?  Would it be an ordinary service
agreement as provided in their tariff?  Which would come first, our deal with
PNM or with our shipper?  It might be good to come up with some examples of
likely scenarios.

6.  Would acquisition of PNM capacity prevent unnecessary construction of new
facilities?

 - Yes.  Demand currently exceeds available capacity on the San Juan
Lateral.  Transwestern was unable to construct San Juan Phase II because of
prohibitively high costs of obtaining an easement on Navajo land.  Using the
PNM Blanco to Rio Puerco line is one of the few remaining alternatives
available to TW to expand this portion of its system.  It would enable TW to
transport an additional ______ of gas for shippers from the San Juan Basin to
delivery points on the mainline of TW's system without the need for expanding
the San Juan lateral.  The acquired capacity would benefit customers by
effectively providing incremental capacity on a constrained portion of TW's
system, at minimal cost to TW and no environmental disturbance.  Would enable
both TW and PNM to use their systems more efficiently.


Lucy,

#32 and #29 are fine.

#28 paid weekly on 1/5.  Then he switched to biweekly.  He should have paid
260 on 1/12.  Two weeks rent in advance.  Instead he paid 260 on 1/19.  He
either needs to get back on schedule or let him know he is paying in the
middle of his two weeks.  He is only paid one week in advance.  This is not a
big deal, but you should be clear with tenants that rent is due in advance.

Here is an updated rentroll.  Please use this one instead of the one I sent
you this morning.

Finally, can you fax me the application and lease from #9.

Phillip


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:06 PM -----

	James D Steffes
	02/27/2001 02:41 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, bhansen@lhom.com, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, JBennett@GMSSR.com, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, jkradin@marathon-com.com, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, ken@kdscommunications.com, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron,
Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
rlichtenstein@marathon-com.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, syamane@marathon-com.com, SGovenar@govadv.com,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Database of Public Documents

The following items are available or being produced by Enron resources to
support the on-going activities related to California.  If I've missed
anything, let me know.

When anyone needs new material, please feel free to contact John Neslage.

John Neslage will keep the material and should be apprised of any new
material.  John's number is 713-853-6827.

Thanks,

Jim

------------------------------------------

READY TO GO

Steve Kean Letter to Sen. Feinstein  RE:  California Status
Steve Kean Letter to Sen. Wyden RE:  Information Release
Enron Fixes for California (attached)
CERA Highlights on California Crisis

IN PRODUCTION

One Page Fact Sheet - Buy Books, Not the Grid
One Page Fact Sheet - Enron's Opposition to Cal ISO Takeover by California
Politicans (Mirant v. ISO)
One Page Fact Sheet - How Big a Blackout for Summer 2002?
One Page Fact Sheet - Enron's Global Solution
EPA Package - Necessary Fixes to Increase Supply


Installation is complete.  Extension is 30905.  Please let me know if you
require any changes to service.

Note to Specialists:  You will be provided new face plates asap.

tm


Mike,

Edison can deal with the letter, either in it's pre-SoCalGas modified form,
or with the SoCalGas edited letter.   Unless you hear otherwise from us,
consider us signatories (using Doug Porter's name).

However, I do agree with Michael Rochman that the SoCalGas version's
comments on point five are a bit weaker than I would like.  It is more than
a matter of having to duplicate the effort already expended, it is also a
matter of having to justify that level of effort in light of a diminished
perception (at least) of the chances of implementation of the results of
that effort.  I would prefer that be indicated politely, but clearly.

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

                    Michael
                    Rochman              To:     "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>,
"'Pocta, Robert
                    <rochmanm@spu        M.'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'Counihan,
Rick'"
                    rr.org>              <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
                                         "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
                    12/11/2000           <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'John
Burkholder'"
                    10:57 AM             <burkee@cts.com>, "'Mike Alexander'"
                                         <alexanms@sce.com>, "'Craig
Chancellor'"
                                         <craigc@calpine.com>, "'Colin
Cushnie'"
                                         <cushnice@sce.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich'"
                                         <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Paul
Amirault'"
                                         <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>, "'Doug
Porter'"
                                         <porterdk@sce.com>, "'Tom Beach'"
                                         <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>,
"'Amirault, Paul'"
                                         <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>, "'Craig
Chancellor,
                                         Calpine'" <craigc@calpine.com>,
"'How-Downing,
                                         Lindsey'"
<Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>, "'Phil
                                         Davies, WGSI Calgary'"
<PhilDavies@aec.ca>,
                                         "'jleslie@LUCE.com'"
<jleslie@LUCE.com>, "'Jeff
                                         Fawcett, Transwestern'"
<jfawcett@enron.com>,
                                         Michael Rochman
<rochmanm@spurr.org>, "'Rick
                                         Counihan, Greenmountain.com'"
                                         <counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'Bayless,
                                         David@Utility'"
<david.bayless@utility.com>,
                                         "'Dingwall, Brian@UEM'"
<bdingwall@unitedgas.com>,
                                         "'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'"
<eke@aelaw.com>,
                                         "'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'"
                                         <johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu>, "'Jun,
                                         Christine@aelaw'" <chj@aelaw.com>,
"'Karp,
                                         Joseph@Whitecase'"
<karpjos@sf.whitecase.com>,
                                         "'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
                                         "'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'"
<joe.paul@dynegy>, "'Pocta,
                                         Mark@ORA'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'Scott, Susan@TW'"
                                         <sscott3@enron.com>, "'Worster,
Gerard@TXU'"
                                         <gworster@txuenergy.com>,
"'kmills@CFBF.com'"
                                         <kmills@CFBF.com>, "'Karp,
Joseph@Whitecase'"
                                         <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com>, "'Skaff,
Andy@Dynegy'"
                                         <askaff@chrm.com>
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Proposed revisions
to CSA Letter

I would like to see us try to re-insert words to the effect that if the
Commission throws out the CSA after haranguing the parties to reach an
agreement, it will seriously discourage future settlement efforts by
parties. That is not a deal-breaker for me, just a suggestion. Otherwise
the comments are fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: MBD [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:43 AM
To: 'Pocta, Robert M.'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com';
'John Burkholder'; 'Mike Alexander'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Colin
Cushnie'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; MBD; 'Paul Amirault'; 'Doug Porter'; 'Tom
Beach'; 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'; 'How-Downing,
Lindsey'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'jleslie@LUCE.com'; 'Jeff
Fawcett, Transwestern'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Rick Counihan,
Greenmountain.com'; 'Bayless, David@Utility'; 'Dingwall, Brian@UEM';
'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'; 'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'; 'Jun,
Christine@aelaw'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM';
'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'; 'Pocta, Mark@ORA'; 'Scott, Susan@TW'; 'Worster,
Gerard@TXU'; 'kmills@CFBF.com'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'Skaff,
Andy@Dynegy'
Subject: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Here are some edits to our letter from socal.  I do not feel they diminsh
the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as you
would expect.  They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the procedural

events at the end of the letter.  If this gets them on the letter, I say
let's sign.  I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the
letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today.  I really
appreciate the quick turnaround.  Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:GWright@sempra.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'
Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Mike,
Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a
minute.  The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we
discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one).

Gillian

<<CSA Letter SCG.doc>>

Gillian A. Wright
Regulatory Case Manager
Sempra Energy
555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
(213) 244-3833
(213) 244-8820 fax
gwright@sempra.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 08:21 AM ---------------------------

Sarah Palmer
04/02/2001 04:26 PM
To:	Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Enron Business Article for Your Review

Jim, I believe you forgot to attach your revised document.  Thanks for your kind comments.

Jim Schwieger
04/02/2001 03:10 PM
To:	Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Enron Business Article for Your Review

Sarah:
I think you have done a great job on the article.  I know the Weather Group will appreciate the comments.  I did make a few changes and saved them as the same document with a "_Schwieger" behind it.  I have no pride of ownership and Im not a writer so do with it as you see fit!

	Thanks,   Jim Schwieger
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 03:07 PM ---------------------------

Sarah Palmer
04/02/2001 02:45 PM
To:	Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, stephen.bennett@enron.com, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Enron Business Article for Your Review

OK, here's an initial draft of your Enron Business article.  Please review and return your comments to me as soon as possible.  The deadline for changes is noon on Wednesday.

Mike: please be sure that everyone quoted has a chance to review their quote.  Also, one more question: who is the female in the photo shoot -- you just told me there were no female meteorologists!

Thanks, guys, for taking the time to meet with me.  I enjoyed writing this one.

Warm regards,
Sarah.
x39843

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Kay:

The tour we are conducting next week is designed to provide Livingston County
officials with a first hand view of the Lincoln Energy Center in Manhattan,
IL.

The scope of work which Piper Marbury (Mark Gershon, Karen Way) is working
under is described below:
 1.  Interface with Livingston officials to determine appropriate invite list
from Zoning Board of Appeals, Plan Commision, and County Board
 2.  Attend the tour on 8/22 (approx 4 hours) - Presentation to attendees,
site tour, bus ride to and from Livingston
 3.  Handle follow-up issues/questions from Livingston officials

We conducted a similar tour for the Kendall County officals in June and it
was very beneficial in terms of obtaining our local zoning and other
approvals.  We are obviously hoping for a similar result with the Livingston
County group.

Call me to discuss.

Fred

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           08/14/2000 06:36 PM

To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Livingston County Tour of Lincoln Energy Center

Hi guys,

I want to make sure that you are comfortable with whatever services are being
provided by Piper Rudnick, so that there won't be any surprises when the bill
comes in.  Could you give me a brief outline of their scope?

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 06:31
PM ---------------------------

"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on 08/09/2000
05:48:44 PM
To: "Fred J. Mitro (E-mail)" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Rusty Stevens (E-mail)"
<rsteven@enron.com>, "Susan M. Landwehr (E-mail)" <slandweh@ees.enron.com>,
"Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Jim Murphy (E-mail)"
<jvmurf@mediaone.net>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,
"Novak, Theodore J. - CHI" <Theodore.Novak@piperrudnick.com>, "Shindler,
Donald A. - CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen S. - CHI"
<karen.way@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Livingston County Tour of Lincoln Energy Center

Mason Hall,  Livingston County Coordinator, has confirmed that the County
Agriculture and Zoning Committee, other key County officials and staff would
like to join us for a tour of the Lincoln Energy Center on August 22, 2000.
Current plan is for a bus to pick up participants in Pontiac at 10 a.m. and
to  return by approximately 2:30 to 3:00.  Lunch will be served at the site.
Mason anticipates approximately 15 to 20 participants.  We are also planning
to invite certain Township and City of Pontiac officials and should consider
other potential invitees including neighbors and other politicians.

Mark A. Gershon
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
Phone:   (312) 368-2127
Fax:   (312) 630-5338
Mark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/26/2000 04:09 PM
-----

	Rob Bradley@ENRON
	10/26/2000 03:39 PM

		 To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New EIA Electricity Demand Growth Estimate: 3.1% growth in 1999

Attached is a press release from the DOE's Energy Information
Administration announcing a 3.1% increase in power generation last year.

This is the 3rd increase in the 1999 electric generation estimate from EIA.
The first estimate was 1% growth from 1998, the second 1.6%, and the third is
3.1%.  The 1999 increase comes on top of a 1998 increase of 3.5%--a year that
some attributed solely to the El Nino warming spike.  Even if so, 1998 is now
normalized by the 1999 jump.

Pancaking 3-4% growth years is really phenomenal, especially when the EIA
forecast is around 1.5% per year growth.

Something is going on with electricity demand, and Mark Mills'
Internet-electron thesis is looking better and better.

Whatever occurs with 2000 demand and generation, some consumption (phantom
generation) has been lost in California from the shortages.  Only with an
open production (and transmission) market do we know how much demand is
really growing.

- Rob

Energy Information Administration
EIA Reports
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, DC  20585

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OCTOBER 26, 2000

    Nonutility Net Generation Up 37 Percent in 1999

Net generation of electricity from nonutility (nonregulated)
generators increased 37 percent in 1999, advancing from
11 percent to 15 percent of total net electricity generation
according to information released today by the Energy
Information Administration in "Electric Power Annual 1999
Volume II" (see Figure).  Electric utilities (regulated
generators) and nonutility generators combined to produce a
record 3.7 trillion kilowatthours in 1999, a 3.1 percent
increase over 1998.

The shift in electricity generation from regulated to
nonregulated generators was driven largely by State-level
restructuring legislation which requires or encourages
divestiture of a utility's generating assets.  In 1999,
50,884 megawatts of electricity generating capability was
sold by utilities to nonutilities.  In addition to the
purchases of generating assets from utilities, nonutility
companies added 6,769 megawatts of new capability, compared
with the 3,689 megawatts added by utilities.

Additional highlights from the report include:

*  Over half (54 percent) of the nonutility net generation
   of nearly 0.6 trillion kilowatthours was from gas.  Coal,
   however, increased its share of nonutility net generation
   to almost 23 percent in 1999 from 16 percent in 1998,
   primarily as a result of recent purchases of coal-fired
   generating capability from utilities.  More detailed data
   on nonutility capability will be available later this
   month with the release of "Inventory of Nonutility
   Electric Power Plants in the United States 1999."  For
   detailed utility capability data, see "Inventory of
   Electric Utility Power Plants in the United States 1999"
   at:
   http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/ipp/ipp99_sum.html

*  Although there was a 3.1 percent increase in net
   electricity generation, utility and nonutility emissions
   of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide were up 2.1 percent
   and 3.0 percent, respectively, as most new generating
   capability is gas-fired.  Nitrogen oxide emissions remained
   unchanged from the 1998 level.

"Electric Power Annual 1999 Volume II" is available on EIA's
Internet site at:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epav2/epav2_sum.html
Printed copies of the report will be available in November
from the U.S. Government Printing Office, 202/512-1800 or
through EIA's National Energy Information Center, 202/586-8800.
The figure referenced above may be viewed along with this
press release on EIA's Web Site or can be requested from EIA's
Press Contact.

**************************************************************
The report described in this press release was prepared by the
Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical
and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy.
The information contained in the report and the press release
should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration
and should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any
policy position of the Department of Energy or any other
organization.
**************************************************************

EIA Program Contact: Robert Schnapp,  202/426-1211
EIA Press Contact:
National Energy Information Center, 202/586-8800

EIA-2000-19
--------------------------  To Unsubscribe  -----------------------------
You are currently subscribed to eiapr as: [rbradle@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-eiapr-111608L@tonto.eia.doe.gov.
Please do not use the reply button.


WE CUT THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULES RT. HE 13 EPMI_CISO_SPP 40 MW EXPORT AT SUMMIT. ALSO EPMI_CISO_TOBY FOR THE SAME HOUR GOT CUT FROM 25 TO O AT NOB.

I COULD NOT FIND THE VOLUME MGMT EMAIL ADDRESS SO I AM ONLY SENDING IT TO YOU.

GEIR