I think you're missing a "solve" in last sentence.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:48 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision? Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

Thanks.  With that, unless I hear otherwise from folks by 4 PM PST---and all
suggestions on how to make the comment better are welcome and
appreciated---I'll go ahead and forward on to Art O'Donnell.

	Richard Shapiro
	11/30/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision? Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

I would say we engage on this and other issues in California  in a more
assertive manner- message is fine. Laying low and  working backchannels is
working great so far??? NOT

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:41 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision?  Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

As you know, we've been working for about an eternity to unbundle SoCalGas'
system.  90+% of the industry agreed to an unbundling solution and filed it
as a settlement at the Commission.  In opposition, muni generators and TURN
supported SoCalGas' original proposal to essentially maintain the status quo
(SoCalGas eventually came over to our side, as did Southern California
Edison).

A judge's proposed decision came out the day before Thanksgiving adopting the
settlement advocated by the muni generators and TURN.

If it weren't for the continual barrage of retrograde policy pronouncements
coming from the "new" California PUC, folks would be genuinely shocked by the
judge's proposed decision, but as things are, it was somewhat expected.

There's one silver lining:  We managed to get in both settlements an
identical provision that eliminates a substantial amount of financial risk TW
would have faced but for the provision.  So from that perspective, the choice
to go with the TURN/muni settlement and embrace the status quo does no harm.
It does considerable harm, however, when compared to the significant value
that would have been created if the judge adopted the the unbundling
settlement.

We have a chance to go on the record in a trade publication "California
Energy Markets."  Recent events might persuade us to keep a low profile
generally at this point.  On the other hand, perhaps the time is right to
start coming out of our corner just a bit and pointing out the very poor job
this Commission is doing in managing California's energy policy.  I'm
squarely on the fence at this point and am seeking feedback.  A proposed
comment is attached.

Two questions:

1) Do folks think that there's value in providing a comment?

2) If so, does this statement work, or do folks have suggestions?

Thanks,
Jeff

"The California Public Utilities Commission has a choice. It can adopt the
same, common sense natural gas policy for Southern California that,s been in
place and working well for consumers in PG&E,s service territory.  Or it
stick with the status quo, which the industry agrees is at least partially
responsible for bottlenecks and high prices in California.  The proposed
decision opts for the status quo.  That's not going to California,s natural
gas problems and it,s likely to make matters worse in California's electric
industry."


Sally,
I want wanted to congratulate you on your promotion to Managing Director.  I
wish you the best of luck.
Jennifer Medcalf
Senior Director
Global Strategic Sourcing-Business Development
Office: (713) 646-8235
Fax:    (713) 646-2450
Mobile:(713) 562-7199


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041613.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 13 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Click on the following  link to add the 'Financial Trading Agreements'
database to your Notes Workspace:

Link -->


Stacey,

 The new deal, 158220, is missing 10,000 for day 1.  Please let me know when
you have this corrected.  Thanks

Thu
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 09:40 AM
---------------------------

Tina Valadez
03/03/2000 08:23 AM
To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1/2000 Lower Colorado River Vols

Could you let me know when you've had a chance to look at the LCRA volume?

Thank You,
Tina Valadez


Can you please give Sara the NYMEX numbers to review while Mark and I are
out.  Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinari, Sabra L.
Sent:	Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:26 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Lone Star activity

Heres the spreadsheet I keep on the Lonestar nom, the points have been the same all month so far.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:52 PM
To:	Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Kelly, Katherine L.
Subject:	RE: Lone Star activity

I just spoke with Theresa Vos.  She handles the accounting for these deals and she said they have to do everything outside the system because ENA is not collecting the slaes revenue or making the payments to the suppliers.  Joe was very concerned about putting deals in Sitara because he was afraid that we might double bill TXU.  There is also a problem with the Feb activity because TXU recorded all the activity as ENA activity instead of Ponderosa Pine activity.  It also appears that TXU withholds payments for the smallest indiscretions in the billing too.  We can chat about that next week.

Sabra, do you know what points Apache/Cinergy and Williams is giving us the gas at?  I'd like to see that if possible.

Thanks

I'm taking off Friday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinari, Sabra L.
Sent:	Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:31 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Kelly, Katherine L.
Subject:	RE: Lone Star activity

yes, I am basically handling any "old" wholesale business which for now includes the FGT/Citrus, Lonestar and some Enron Compressor stuff on TW.  I do have a Sitara ticket that we are updating for the sale to TXU, just let me know the price and I'll update it.  I'm updating the supply tickets, I believe its a long term deal...I don't know all the details about all this.  Is Joe Parks leaving or something, why are you doing all this stuff now?

FYI:  I call it the Cleburne Plant and it is at the same point as it was for the first 3 days of the month.  The scheduler over there calls me every morning to verify.

Sabra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:19 AM
To:	Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Kelly, Katherine L.
Subject:	Lone Star activity

I don't know if I should call this the Ponderosa Pine plant, the Cleburne Plant, or what.  Think I'll refer to it as Cleburne.

Sabra, Joe Parks told me that you handling Lone Start in the future.

I sold 10,000 dth to TXU for tomorrow.  I believe we have sold TXU 10,000 dth everyday this month so far.  Lyn at TXU asked me if the gas was at the same point for tomorrow and I told her "sure" and I have no idea what points our gas is coming from.

I don't know how much time we need to spend on this.  But, I have not put anything in Sitara and I don't know if I should.  I believe Theresa Voss's (on 3 in Enron Center South) group is handling the accounting for this and I don't know what they need.  I'm going to try and meet her today.

Sabra, are you handling this?  Let me know.  If you are, do you want/need/care if this is in Sitara and Unify?  I believe all of the activity for this deal flowed through ENA before bankruptcy.  Now, I believe the partnership makes all the payments and billings and they probably pay ENA a fee.  Joe made it very clear that ENA is NOT supposed to send out an invoice.

thx
chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 07:27
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark E Haedicke                           04/18/2000 01:10 PM

To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, kraisler@sc.com
cc:
Subject: Site Structure Diagram

For your review -- the latest diagram for the paper website.  Michael, I am
free to discuss this at your convenience.  I am hopeful this structure will
be unregulated in Europe as well.  Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000
01:03 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brandon Wax                           04/18/2000 11:48 AM

To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Site Structure Diagram

Mark,

Attached is the site structure diagram we were looking at earlier.  Let me
know if you have any questions or would like to discuss the credit interface
more thoroughly.  I will also forward the clean presentation copy with I get
it back from graphics.

       -Brandon


Since the NBA season begins tonight, we need to have the fantasy basketball
draft today @ 10:30 AM. Tell me if this is ok.  If you do not remember the
rules, go to the link below and scroll down to the bottom of the page to the
rules link.

The Academy will roll once again!

And by the way plove, it is last day for everyone.  You can take 1 minute out
of every half hour today to make a pick.  Everyone else has agreed.  Besides
it won't be as much fun without my whipping boy again.

basketball.commissioner.com/efba

I never heard anything back from Walker's Westies so The Rounders are taking
his spot.

-Eric


I would like a copy of the Pompano Beach and Deerfield Site Plan Approvals,
please.
Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Williams/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
07:28 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Kim Ward                           02/05/2001 05:26 PM

To: Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SMUD

Guys,

I am showing SMUD prices for 2, 3 and 5 year financial swaps at Malin for
15,000 MMBtu.  Prices look like - 2 yr=$7.60, 3 yr=$6.60, and 5 yr. 5.76.
Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kim
x30685

ps.  This will fall under the current swap agreement with any applicable
credit language attached.


PLEASE FORWARD TO INTERESTED FOLK...

Business and the Environment Day
at UC Berkeley
April 19th -

Seating is limited for all events - Come Early!
Free admission

12:45-2:00 pm: Second Annual Haas Earth Day Lecture on Business and the
Environment
Amory Lovins, CEO (Research), Rocky Mountain Institute
"Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution"
Introduction by Dean Laura Tyson
Wells Fargo Room, Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley

Amory Lovins, co-author of Natural Capitalism, will discuss how changes in
natural capital (the natural environment and ecosystems that support all
human and economic activity) are already affecting the way we do business,
and how leading corporations are gaining competitive advantage through
superior environmental performance. He will talk about how corporations can
employ advanced resource productivity strategies to move toward becoming
ecologically sustainable, reduce environmental impact, and improve the bottom
line.

Mr. Lovins is the co-founder and CEO (Research) of Rocky Mountain Institute
(RMI), a nonprofit organization that assists businesses, communities, and
governments to create more wealth and employment, protect and enhance natural
and human capital, and increase profit and competitive advantage through
resource and operational efficiency. The Wall Street Journal named Mr. Lovins
one of 39 people world-wide "most likely to change the course of business in
the '90s"; Newsweek has praised him as "one of the Western world's most
influential energy thinkers"; and Time recognized him with one of their Hero
of the Planet awards.

Sponsored by the Haas School of Business and Net Impact at Haas
For more information, contact Eric Strand at strand@haas.berkeley.edu

3:00-5:00 pm: Energy and Resources Group Energy Forum
Dr. Severin Borenstein, UC Energy Institute
Prof. Richard Norgaard, Energy and Resources Group, and others
"Re-De-Regulation: Planning, Learning, Blundering and the Future of
Electricity in California"
Sibley Auditorium, Bechtel Engineering Center

Sponsored by the Energy Resources Group, UC Berkeley

6:00 - 8:00 pm: Ninth Annual ERG Lecture on Energy
Dr. Arthur Rosenfeld, California Energy Commission
Sibley Auditorium, Bechtel Engineering Center

Dr. Rosenfeld, UC Berkeley Professor Emeritus in Physics and in the Energy &
Resources Group, is a present member of the California Energy Commission. His
work on energy efficiency is widely recognized as the standard against which
other studies are judged.

Sponsored by the Energy and Resources Group, UC Berkeley
For more information, contact Donna at dbridges@socrates.Berkeley.EDU

Adam Berman
Haas School of Business
(510) 981-0568
berman@haas.berkeley.edu


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:46 PM -----

	Tara Rafter
	02/20/2001 06:08 PM

		 To: Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wiley Cauthen/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Fitzgerrell/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Kikumi
Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella
Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi
Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Rochelle
Lessner/ENRON@enronxgate, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky L
Merola/TNPC/EES@EES, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, FRED
MILLER/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Fred
Rimington/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gavin Russo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shepherd/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Henry
Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terence H
Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Wilson/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James Sandt/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: 2000 Lobbying Expenses

Please provide your assistance in completing the attached questionnaire
relating to 2000 lobbying activities.  I would like to receive all completed
questionnaires on or before March 9, 2001.  If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at 713-345-8362.  Thanks so much for your help.

Tara Rafter
Director
Enron Corp. Tax Planning


Understanding there won't be a call on Monday, here's a draft of the auction
slides that we've been working on for folks to review.


What a great addition to my day.

I'm getting close to being finished with the year end crises (I hope I hope I
hope), and I'm looking forward to fuelcelling again.  Thanks for being
patient.

See you tomorrow.

Kay


Monica,

Things are a little bit unsettled right now. I am working on them and will have something shortly.
Your patience is appreciated.

Andy Zipper


No, I don't need one, but thanks for hunting that down!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Young, Kay
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Deutsche Bank

Tana:  The current Net Works ca with Deutsche Bank was filed under "Du".  Sorry about that.  You weren't in your cube so I gave a copy to Mark Greenberg.  Do you need one.?

Kay Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Ph:   713-853-6794
Fax: 713-646-3393


Hal,  FYI, Attached is another form of O&M agreement specifically for
offshore lines.  The structure of this agreement is different from our
current deal, but the provided services in this form may be a good start for
the Mariner O&M form.


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

eSource
eSource, Enron's research group, has experienced an overwhelmingly positive response to the research training which it has hosted.  Participation and interest by Enron employees has exceeded expectations and many classes were quickly filled.  As a result, repeat classes have been offered and new sessions have been added to the program.  In addition to the Lexis-Nexis and Dow Jones classes, eSource has now begun hosting sessions on Piranha (financials and pricing information), Investext (analyst reports and market analysis), Global Access (financials and corporate activity), and Securities Data Corp. (M&A, debt).   eSource has also arranged long distance sessions using interactive web tools for Enron employees around the world.  Watch for e-mails announcing new training sessions, either in Houston or in a virtual desktop mode.

Since our launch in December, the eSearch website has received over 230,000 hits.  The site today offers Enron employees access to 34 electronic databases.  These databases offer the latest financial and business on-line research capabilities in a cost-effective manner.  In this era of information explosion, databases are constantly being reviewed to ensure that Enron's research needs are being met.  If you know of a professionally relevant database that might be added to eSearch, let us know.  Meanwhile, to further fulfill Enron's research needs, eSource is arranging for desktop access to good-old-fashioned libraries too.  Books from public and local university libraries can be located, borrowed and delivered to employees' desks.  This should be particularly helpful for those with more specialized or technical research needs.

We are also proud to report that at a recent local research conference, Enron's eSource was featured as an industry trailblazer for having invented itself into a combined virtual library and intranet-based research center capable of delivering a broad range of research products and services via the user's desktop.  Attendees from Reliant, Shell, Halliburton and ExxonMobil and others were duly impressed.

As for the future, watch for Version 2.0 of the eSearch website, http://esource.enron.com, scheduled to launch soon.  It will feature greater functionality and additional content.  Look for new features like "Industry Overviews" and links to information providers like Frost & Sullivan, Country Watch, and World Energy Markets.

IN THE NEWS

Chicago And Its Suburbs Pick Enron, ComEd For Power Deals
06/06/2001  Dow Jones Energy Service (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)-The City of Chicago and 47 suburban communities have decided to divide new deals for 400 megawatts of power between Enron Corp. (ENE) and local utility Commonwealth Edison Co., Chicago officials said Wednesday.
In the largest power purchase agreement in Illinois since the state choose to deregulate the industry in 1997, the local government groups will get 60% of their power from Enron and 40% from Exelon Corp.'s (EXC) ComEd. The municipalities use the power for public buildings and public transportation.
Chicago announced Monday that the group has picked ComEd to meet the renewable target by providing 80 megawatts of power created with landfill gas, wind and other sources. ComEd will also provide the coalition with another 80 megawatts of power generated with fossil fuel and nuclear plants, and Enron will provide the other 240 megawatts. The new contracts are expected to go into effect this year.
"We used our purchasing power as local governments to get the best price we could and at the same time to promote competition in Illinois. Enron gave us the most competitive price,"  Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley said at a press conference.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Jennifer Morris, Mike Reen, Daniel Fuller, Jason Paterniti
ENA  - Craig Hawkins, Carol Langston, Mark Morrow, Harlan Murphy, Bruce Petitt, Emily Schwarzbach, Alice Wright, Allyson Zykorie

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - Thomas Kalb, Debra Brannen, Juan Camarillo, Richard Orellana
EGM - Joana Bekerman, Eric Tipp, Kellie Metcalf, Ricardo Charvel, Jason Andrade
EIM - Jaime Araoz, Gabriel Chavez, Enrique Cadena, Rosalinda Castillo, Kimberly Chick, Ana Morena, William Brown, Grisela Escamilla, Paul Burkhart, Jodi Coulter, Douglas McDowell, Catherine Pernot

NUGGETS & NOTES

Enron is hosting the Chicago Energy Risk Management Seminar at The Drake Hotel in Chicago on June 14, 2001.  Topics include: Power Outlook, Natural Gas Outlook, Hedging Strategies, Weather Risk Management and Pulp and Paper Risk Management. The RSVP deadline is June 8th so please contact Laura Pena as soon as possible at x 3-5376.  This is a great event for "new" as well as established customers.  There will be a cocktail reception immediately after the presentations.  Enron will also be hosting seminars in Atlanta, Houston, Denver and San Francisco.  Dates to be announced soon.

Congratulations to Kathy and Craig Taylor, manager in East Origination. They are the proud parents of a baby girl, Katherine Montgomery, born on May 25.

Travel tip of the week:
When booking through TAP or ClickTrip, use preferred domestic airline carriers to recognize special Enron discounts.
	American		28%		American West		15%
	Continental		17%		Delta			10-28%
	Northwest		20%		TWA			19-25%
	United			20%		US Airways		30%

Please note: discounts are confidential and should not be disclosed to anyone other than Enron employees.

EnronOnline Statistics
Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of June 5, 2001.

*	Total Life to Date Transactions > 1,045,000
*	Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $630 billion

experience Enron
Announcing enhancements to experience Enron:
?	To begin your customer's Enron experience, we will send out customized invitations with a Guest Check-In Card that contains detailed instructions about check in.
?	experience ENRON has partnered with the Plaza Reception Desk Staff to create a less stressful check in process for your customers.  Once they present their card, the Plaza Reception Desk Staff will welcome them and present them with a prepared experience ENRON name badge.
?	experience ENRON has also created a new look for your meetings.  Our new table tents, welcome folders, name badges, agendas and presentation templates all have the same look to maintain a consistent feel throughout the visit.
?	All of this is to ensure that your guest has a unique and customized experience that will exceed their expectations and help you reach your business goals faster.
For more information on experience ENRON, visit our website at experience.Enron.com.

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.


w/Lay & Frevert - see Christie Patrick for details


EDF is terminating its line with us today.  Sarah


Dan,
Received this contract but looks like you put in I + .05 instead of I + .005
Can you please correct and send to me?
Thanks

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           10/27/2000 01:11 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Marathon

Dan,
Please prepare the necessary documents.  The accepted proposal is below
Option A.
Thanks,
Gary


can we make it a weekend

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

give me the explanations and i will think about it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

is that a yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't wait to hear those.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i promise if you are serious i will come up with the explanations

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i'm supposed to go to ny with your for one day and you haven't given me a reason why or an explanation for anyone.  keep up charlie brown.  and you didn't answer me about hiring someone!  what does that mean?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

what do you mean, you are worth it for one day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

that's not a good enough reason!  you are worth it for one day!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

because its with me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you tell me why and i will seriously think about it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i think going to ny is in your best interest

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

see you cannot be trusted.  and how is that looking out for your best interests?  should you change your thinking sir?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:13 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

youre right, im sorry, i think i was looking out for me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why would you want to do that?  how is that looking out for me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i think so

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

are you trying to get me in trouble charlie brown?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

really?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you find me the explanation to all and i will find the day!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i am serious, you can find one day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

are you being serious?  i am not my own boss you forget.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you tell me, my schedule is pretty open

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok when?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

cant we just go for one day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

they are lighting the tree on wednesday in ny!  we are going to miss it.


The latest financial news from the ISO

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 01:29 PM -----

	CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com>
	04/30/2001 02:49 PM
	Please respond to "Leiber, Phil"

		 To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO Notice: Market Notice--February Preliminary Invoice

> ISO Market Participants:
>
> Cash clearing related to the preliminary invoice for February 2001 was
> scheduled for today, April 30, 2001.
>
> A preliminary overview of the cash received follows:
>
> Funds due ISO (Accounts Receivable):
>   GMC         $23,049,950.38
>   Market         $972,588,030.84
>             ------------------------
>   Total         $995,637,981.22
>
> Funds Received:
>   GMC         $4,500,303.61
>   Market         $59,136,334.68
>             ------------------------
>   Total         $63,636,628.29
>
> Funds due for ISO GMC, Market Participants (Accounts Payable):
>   GMC         $23,049,950.38
>   Market         $952,742,085.50
>
> Preliminary shortfall:
>   GMC         $18,549,646.77
>   Market         $893,605,750.82
>
> Reallocated shortfall:
>   GMC         $0
>   Market         $912,155,397.59
>
>
> Funds available for distribution to market participants are reduced by the
> GMC shortfall, accordingly, $40,586,687.91 ($59,136,334.68 less GMC
> shortfall of $18,549,646.77) will be available for distribution against
> February ISO market accounts payable of $952,742,085.50, and against prior
> months balances.  Due to this shortfall in receipts from market debtors,
> the ISO is required to perform calculations in accordance with ISO Tariff
> Section 11 and Settlements and Billing Protocol ("SABP") Section 6 to
> determine the appropriate pro-rata distributions to market participants.
> Any potential distributions are reduced to pay previously defaulted
> amounts, or current month GMC obligations of that market participant.
> Distributions will be made upon completion of these calculations.   These
> figures also do not consider any amounts payable directly to market
> participants from the California Department of Water Resources.
>
> As noted in previous communications, the ISO will provide a comprehensive
> reporting of the monthly settlement results after the cash clearing for
> the final (true-up) monthly invoices, and will thereafter distribute a
> current certification of amounts owed.   This report for January 2001 will
> be published shortly.
>
>
> Phil Leiber
> Dir. Financial Planning & Treasurer
> California ISO
> 916 351-2168
> 916-351-2259 (fax)
>
>


Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT
Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Amir Ahanchian/HOU/ECT
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT
Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT
Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT
Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT
Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT


we can hold off on seeing the w alabama house.  just let me know about the
time for tomorrow

e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/09/2001 08:34:43 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Re:Mandell

Good deal.  I think you'll like Bob but, like Dad said, don't feel
obligated.  Don't forget to put the contracts in a folder/envelope and bring
them along.  How many copies did you make?  I'll call the realtors and see
about tomorrow.  Did you want to see 400 W. Alabama again?  It's usually
open on Sunday. LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re:Mandell

>
> Hey Mom,
> I would like to see the Mandell and the Huldy - preferably tomorrow before
> 4ish.  Let me know if that works for you.  Dad is welcome to see whichever
> houses he would like.
>
> FYI, I am meeting with Bob Dunn today after work, and I made copies of the
> contracts.
>
> L,
> E
>
>
>
>
> "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/09/2001 06:43:42 AM
>
> Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
>
> To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Do you want me to check with the realtors to see if those houses are open
> this weekend and, if not, do you want me to make appts.?  Let me know.
> I'll
> do that today.  I would like Dad to see Mandell but that's up to you.  He
> can't do it today, I don't think.  But, if you would like to see something
> today, I'll try to arrange it.  I would prefer to see all of them the same
> day but I will leave the up to you.  I didn't want you to think that I
have
> forgotten about you.  Did you download the contract and make copies?  LU-M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Re:Mandell
>
>
> >
> > no i haven't driven by yet.  i would like to see the mandell house again
> > before putting a contract in on it.
> >
> > -e
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 02:45:35 PM
> >
> > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> >
> > To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
> >
> >
> > Did you drive by Huldy?  If so, what did you think?
> >
> > We can do a contract whenever you want.  Did you call B. Dunn?
> >
> > Talk to you later.  Love, Mom
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 11:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: Re:Mandell
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am fine with seeing more houses before buying but was thinking that
> it
> > > might be a good idea to get the ball rolling on the Mandell house
(i.e.
> > low
> > > ball contract). This does not mean that I am wanting to buy right
away,
> > but
> > > more of testing the market and resolve of sellers.  Let me know when
> you
> > > are available to see more houses.  I am free whenever, except for
> > Saturday
> > > after around 4 pm.
> > >
> > > L,
> > > E
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 10:19:51 AM
> > >
> > > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > >
> > > To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> > > cc:   "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
> > > Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
> > >
> > >
> > > It's been so long since we talked, I don't know what I'm supposed to
be
> > > doing.
> > >
> > > Just finished real estate school and learned a few things - well, my
> > memory
> > > was refreshed.  Re: precertification for a loan.  A non-committal
> > response
> > > from an online source does not mean that you are precertified.  And,
> you
> > > must be real careful about all conditions relating to said loan.  Dad
> > > thinks
> > > you should call Bob Dunn (call Dad for number.).  Bob is in the
> mortgage
> > > business and is a good guy to have on your side.  His office is near
> San
> > > Felipe and Voss.  You should probably get this ball rolling so you are
> > > ready, don't you think?
> > >
> > > I am busy today but let me know if you want to see anything Friday.
We
> > > could wait until the weekend to see what's open and make appts. for
> > > whatever
> > > else you want to see.  I recommend that you see a few more before
> making
> > an
> > > offer but that is up to you.
> > >
> > > Let me know what I can do.  LU-M
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > > To: <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:11 AM
> > > Subject: Re:Mandell
> > >
> > >
> > > > Any news?
> > > >
> > > > -e
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Wow.  It sounds like you really have your heart set on having a jock strap or 2 on display at your place...I may have to get in tough with some of those Patriots.

>From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
>To: "Molly Coffin"
>Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
>Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:03:04 -0500
>
>Forget that, I'm expecting a new hanging planter for Christmas. (Tee
>hee).
>
>Kisses,
>Jeff
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Molly Coffin [mailto:mollycoffin@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:02 PM
>To: Dasovich, Jeff
>Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
>
>
>
>See...reading Martha Stewart Living may make me rich yet!
>
>
>
> >From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> >To: "Scott Laughlin" , , , "eldon sellers (E-mail)"
> >CC: , , ,
> >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:23:35 -0500
> >
> >Molly gets all her picks from "The Living Guide to Picking NFL Winners"
>
> >by Martha Stewart. Note on p. 12 of this months version: Martha shows
> >how to make hanging planters out of the jock straps worn by the front
> >line of the New England Patriots.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Scott Laughlin [mailto:scottwl@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:06 PM
> >To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com; mollycoffin@hotmail.com
> >Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com; cameron@perfect.com; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com;
> >PSellers@pacbell.net
> >Subject: Re: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> >
> >
> >No, I want her picks! This is going to start a major bidding war...
> >
> >
> > >From: Nancy Sellers
> > >To: "'Molly Coffin (Hotmail)'"
> > >CC: 'Sean Maloney' , Cameron
> >,
> > >Jeff Dasovich , "Prentice @ Berkeley"
> > >, Prentice Sellers ,
> > >Scott Laughlin
> > >Subject: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:22:50 -0700
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Molly, please fill out this sheet for me!
> > >
> > > <>
> > >
> > ><< PickSheet-Week8.xls >>
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >**********************************************************************
> >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
>sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
>the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
>enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
>message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
>an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
>enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
>the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
>anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> >**********************************************************************
>
> _____
>
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>

  _____

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com <http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp>


Randy,

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Greg yesterday.  I am looking forward
to exploring with you both specific pricing on selected counterparties, and
various applications for this product such as L/C substitution and hedging
recognized MTM earnings.

 Attached please find our template non-disclosure agreement.  I will call you
on Monday to discuss your timing on how we might proceed.

Regards,  Bruce


I do too, but I think you should send it with the appropriate caveats (which
I communicated verbally to her).

Richard Shapiro
07/10/2000 05:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES
cc:
Subject: Job Description

Thoughts? I continue to think this is an unproductive exercise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 07/10/2000
05:52 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway@ENRON
07/10/2000 04:52 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Job Description

Please review.  Let's discuss my changes when you get a chance.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 04:25 PM -----

	Britt Davis@ENRON
	10/16/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Vote/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bonnie White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Attorney Recruit:  Cheryl Nelson

Twanda,

Per Richard's voice-mail, this is to advise that Nelson will be meeting the
Unit for a lunch/interview on Wednesday, from around 11:45 to around 2:30.
Let me know if you need more information.

Britt


I have received your E-Mail.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	lunch w/ will

Date:		12/13/2000
Time:		11:30 AM - 12:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


I'll be here.


Tremaine:

Thanks for the update.  If you e-mail me the signature page (eliminating the
page number), I can work to obtain ENA's signatures while you finalize the
document.  In addition, do you want me to forward ENA's incumbency
certificate to your attention for delivery to Citibank?  It might be easier
if all documents associated with the escrow account (incumbency
certificates, fee letter and Form W-9) are delivered to Citibank by one
party.  Let me know.

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Tremaine S. [mailto:TremaineWright@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: 'Reuter, Marisa'
Subject: RE: ENA/NorthWestern: Escrow Agreement

I heard from Citibank and in addition to making reference to the letter
agreement they would like for us to include the text from the note in the
text of the Escrow Property paragraph.  I will revise the draft to reflect
those comments and distribute a copy this evening.

As for the number of signature pages, three sounds good to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Reuter, Marisa [mailto:MReuter@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:58 PM
To: 'TremaineWright@paulhastings.com'
Cc: Keffer, John; 'kay.mann@enron.com'; 'chris.booth@enron.com'
Subject: ENA/NorthWestern: Escrow Agreement

Tremaine:

I thought I'd check in to see if you had heard back from Citibank on the
revised Escrow Agreement.  Also, how many originals does NorthWestern want
executed?  I suggest 3--one for Citibank, one for NorthWestern and one for
ENA?  Do you agree?  Let me know.

Regards,

Marisa

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/30/01 15:58:49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

============================================================================
==

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Yes...I am a true Longhorn.  I think that's why I like Steak Night so much.
I mean how can you beat sitting on a deck, drinking a beer and solving the
words problems (OK., 2 out of 3 ain't bad).  Anyway, Wednesday night sounds
good to me, although, given how work has been going lately I doubt I'll be
able to get there before 7:30.  Just do me a favour and forewarn Pat that
Emily may be attending so he can prepare properly (I don't want any
bloodshed).  I think a couple co-workers are also planning on coming so it
should a good group.

Susan


Following please find the New EnronOnline Executive Summary. This summary
will be sent on a daily basis.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/11/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	2,911
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,462
Total Life to Date Transactions	351,630

EnronOnline Percentage of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/11/00
Enron North America	75%
Enron Europe Limited	36%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	24%
Enron Metals	3%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	43%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,936,402,472
MTD	14,664,724,141
LTD	183,357,784,599
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,621,429,450

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	12,988,516,754

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	507
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,238
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,877
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,458


Do you know decision makers at companies that EES can call on?

If you do, you can turn your ROLODEX into CASH! It's fast, it's
easy--and it could mean big bucks for you AND for Enron.

Don't wait--click below for details today!

http://home.ees.enron.com/vision/comm/demo/leads/


come down here and visit me


Thanks.  Let me know if and when they get out of hand again.  I am reviewing the majority of forms now myself before they go to you.  The bad ones go back to Settlements, good ones go to Risk.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Valdes, John
Subject:	RE: Forms

good, I have some direct meters forms that are under tolerance.  Not a big deal, I simply signed them without looking at them.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valdes, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Love, Phillip M.; Keiser, Kam; Palmer, B. Scott
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Forms

Are the forms any better this month???  If not, let me know where they are lacking and I will correct.  Thanks.

John


Start Date: 1/3/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010324.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 02/02/2001 12:59:28 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MGMT 656

Here is your latest roster. We are up-to-date on all changes but, of
course, the students may still drop/add up to the second week of module 5.
When the time comes, please check your roster carefully and make sure that
the people on the list really are attending your course. Mistakes happen so
I just would like to make sure we have a correct record.

As always, let me know if you would like the excel folder with e-mail
addresses. I don't send them at the same time to avoid overwhelming our
e-mail system. Thanks for your help!

- Pam (713-348-6223)
 - 656.doc


brenda please set up in mydirectory as the next TVA letter
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
04:48 PM ---------------------------

"Robert J. Madden" <Rmadden@Gibbs-Bruns.com> on 02/15/2000 04:23:46 PM
To: "'elizabeth.sager@enron.com'" <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: TVA/EPMI

Elizabeth:  Here is the draft response to TVA's 2/10/00 letter.  Please note
that we need to fill in a fax number for Gary Jackson on teh blank line of
his address block.  Call me if you have any questions.

 <<1T4V01!.WPD>>

 - 1T4V01!.WPD


Please note that the name change from FirstWorld Communications, Inc. to
Verado Holdings, Inc. was just completed today 04/12/01.

Please find attached the Preliminary Name Change/Merger Notification Report
for April.  To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select
Enable Macros and Read Only.

Please note that:
 ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
 Inactivations will be made on May 1

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.


On Thursday, September 27th the ISO conducted a conference call to discuss the
status of the launch of their Inter-SC software upgrade.  During the call
several  SCs requested an extension of the market simulation to include the
week
of October 2nd.   The PX will in turn extend our market simulation for the
entire week of October 2nd using the following schedule:

(See attached file: Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc)

The ISO has scheduled a follow-up call on Wednesday, October 4th to discuss
the
readiness of their software and to determine a comfort level from its
customers
regarding a launch date for the software upgrade.   Currently the ISO is
working
toward a launch the week of October 23rd.

 We will provide an update after Wednesday's call.

We will NOT have a PX call on Wednesday, calls will resume on Thursday,
October
5th.

Thank you.

 - Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc


Return-Path: <love@cl.uh.edu>
Received: from  rly-za01.mx.aol.com (rly-za01.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.97]) by
air-za05.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:19:21 -0500
Received: from  b25tr.cl.uh.edu (b25tr.cl.uh.edu [129.7.166.5]) by
rly-za01.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:19:17 -0500
Received: by B25TR.CL.UH.EDU with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<X6S33M7G>; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:21:01 -0600
Message-ID: <02903EC33ADAD211A9CD00A0C98455E704B1A8A1@B25TR.CL.UH.EDU>
From: "Love, Dianne" <love@cl.uh.edu>
To: "'plove570@cs.com'" <plove570@cs.com>
Subject: FW: Golf's new rule
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:21:00 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denise James [SMTP:drjames@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:01 PM
> To:   Lew Rosenfeld; Love, Dianne; Linda Hester; Lisa Cross; Barry Pulaski
> Subject:  FW: Golf's new rule
>
>
> Word is circulating around the links that a proposed revision to the rules
> of golf is being sought in South
> Florida that would replace the traditional call of "Fore."
> When a player hits an errant shot, he would be allowed to call "Gore"
> while
> the ball is still in flight. He
> could then replace the ball in the same spot and hit it again. The player
> could do this until he is satisfied the ball is going to drop where he
> intended to hit it in the first place.
>
> A recent test of this new rule was recently played out in an exclusive
> club
> in Palm Beach County, Fla., and the first hole took only 21 days to
> complete.
>


Dear Colleagues,

Some of you have been asking for the final version of the manifesto.  The
copy attached is the FINAL version.

David

 - Manifesto DJT 1-25-01.doc
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
Phone:  (510) 642-1075
Fax:  (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================


F.P.,

Do you have your schedule yet?  Let me know as soon as you can.  I need to
schedule a trip with work and I'll schedule it around your visit.  Looking
forward
to seeing you.

KR


I discussed the work permit issue with the UK and they agree we need to apply
as quickly as possible - especially for you, Brent, as it usually takes 4
weeks.  Please complete this form as quickly as possible (Brent, for you
today would be great!) and email to Tara Rozen.  They can then file on
Friday.  If the permit is not in by April 1, we suggest you arrive without
your family until the permit is approved.

Jane


I am missing alot of deals for Mike Swerzbinh and Sean Crandall.  Do you know
if they are still entering deals?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:51 PM
To:	Benson, Robert; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Davis, Mark Dana
Subject:	FW: UBS Trade Products

Please complete Hayden's form for your respective regions.

Keep in mind that this could act as potential position limit set forth by UBS so be careful in completing this form.   In addition, UBS has a liquidity reserve used to adjust curves when marking P&L.    The "liquidity reserve" accounts for the fact you can't liquidate at the mid and with big positions you probably can't even liquidate at the bid (offer).

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:18 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Zufferli, John; Lavorato, John
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	UBS Trade Products

My apologies if this has been done, but I'm in process of assembling list of products that UBS will be trading.  If this list has been compiled, please direct it to me.

I'm interested in getting the greatest granularity possible breaking it out by VaR portfolio name, trader, trading book, commodity, instrument, location, tenor, relative liquidity for each instrument expressed in contract/day (i.e. could impact holding period for VAR) and best risk mitigator.  (Regarding best risk mitigator, I'm not looking for liquidating position comments, but rather best hedge given curve location.)  This will help in directing correlation efforts for VAR.  See attached spreadsheet for suggested format.

Thanks,
Frank


Please call in @ 1330 Pacific. Call In Number (877) 670-4111  Passcode
246870.

There is no set agenda today.

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


To:	    Employees

From:	    ENRON Benefits Department

Subject:    All Employees Participating in the ENRON Domestic Benefit Plans

Enron Benefit Plans
Summary Annual Report

The basic financial and insurance information on the back of this page, as well as the material below, provide a Summary Annual Report for the Enron Benefit Plans.  The annual report for each plan has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

NOTE:  You may receive a report for a benefit plan in which you are not a participant or under which you are not entitled.  Entitlement to benefits under any of the plans is based on the provisions of each plan.

Your Rights to Additional Information

You have the right to receive, upon request, a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan.  For insured plans, insurance information (including any sales commissions paid by insurance carriers) is shown in the annual reports.

To obtain a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan, write or call:

Enron Corp Shareholder Relations
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7311

(713) 853-6161

You also have the right to receive from the plan administrator, on request and at no charge, a statement of the assets and liabilities of the plan and accompanying notes, or a statement of income and expenses of the plan and accompanying notes, or both.  If you request a copy of the full annual report from the plan administrator, these two statements and accompanying notes will be included as part of that report.

You also have the legally protected right to examine the annual report at the main office of the plan (Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX  77002-7311) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., or to obtain a copy from the U.S. Department of Labor upon payment of copying costs.  Requests to the Department should be addressed to:  Public Disclosure Room, N-5638, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.


<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<title>Energy News Live Daily Wrap-Up</title>

Dear Mike,

The Department of Energy is hosting a conference on Clean
Coal Technology on Monday in Washington.  The conference will take a
look at where coal-fired generation could be headed in the
future.  U.S. Energy Association Chairman John Derrick, the
Chairman and CEO of Pepco, is among those scheduled to speak.

Look for energy legislation to move to the forefront when
lawmakers return from Thanksgiving break.  Republicans in the Senate
say they want to take action on energy legislation in December, while
Democrats aren't as sure of the time frame. Next week, the Washington
bureau will bring us an update on where legislation stands and
what the chances are that we'll see a comprehensive energy bill
before the end of the year.

The North American Electric Reliability Council will release
its 2001/2002 Winter Assessment on Tuesday; our Washington bureau
will bring us coverage.

If MTBE is banned, the gasoline industry will have to
drastically increase production of ethanol.  On Monday, the
Houston bureau's
Gale Smith will have a report on some companies
looking at alternative ways of making ethanol.  We'll find out
which products have a chance at becoming a substitute for MTBE.

A recent poll taken by Deloitte & Touche says power
deregulation in Texas won't mean an immediate rate reduction for
consumers.  The Houston bureau will have more from Deloitte &
Touche's Branko Terzic on Monday.

ENL's Kym McNicholas reports the California Power Authority is
meeting over the weekend to discuss the scope and direction of its
Energy Resource Investment Plan.  The plan is due to the
legislature and to the governor by February 15, 2002.  Kym will bring us
the latest on Monday from the weekend meeting.

Also on Monday, the California Energy Commission will hear a
petition for reconsideration of its decision on Calpine's
proposed Metcalf Energy Center.  After the meeting we'll have
comments from the counsel to the petitioners Stephan Volker.

Jolen Operating Company President David Fleischaker will speak
with us from Oklahoma City on Monday.  He'll give us a status check
of energy legislation and discuss what he feels is the real
problem behind Enron.  We'll hear from Fleischaker during the
2:00 p.m. ET newscast.

From Dallas on Monday, RBC Capital Markets Director
Mark
Easterbrook is joining us.  Easterbrook will talk about the
performance and outlook for Master Limited Partnerships in the
energy industry and which investors are suited to buy MLPs.  Catch him
during the 3:00 p.m. ET newscast.

Broadcasting Note: I just want to give you a heads up on the schedule
for next week.  ENL will be dark on Thursday and Friday for the
Thanksgiving market holiday.

Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.
Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue
to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.
Have a wonderful and relaxing weekend!

Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5
p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

    Jay Rickerts,
EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor

      View today's Energy Wrap Video

      Windows Media Player:
56K  |
100K  |
300K

      Real Player:
56K  |
100K  |
300K

      (Requires Windows Media Player or Real
Player)

Experience all that Williams
Energy News Live has to offer!

If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to
continue,

subscribe now

To stop receiving this letter,
unsubscribe now

If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know or
call
 (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

Comments? Suggestions? Let us
know or
call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

      Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All
Rights Reserved.


pls print for my wed. mtg.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/07/2000
04:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Randy Rice                           02/07/2000 02:42 PM

To: Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
Choquette/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Kolarik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie
Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Maybee/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Glenn
Lewis/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Guy Bruner/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Conference call number for Cunningham Electric Contract
discussion

Here are the documents we will be discussing on our conference call. Our
"talking points" are in RED.
thanks R2


I send you the wrong date before.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT on 07/07/2000 06:49
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Reeves
07/07/2000 07:41 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IM TXT FILES

Please note I also attached our excel file as I made a change from the one
that Brian saved out there.
Kathy


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000724633, Password Reset

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000007002


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041618.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 18 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	CWR memo

From the phone call, there was some trouble opening the attachment.


I think we are going to name the baby after your new boss at
KOCH......."Uday"!!!!!!!!

MC


Can I see the Trunkline OBA too

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Bryant, Mike
Subject:	FW: Trunkline OBA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Farrell, Sharon
Subject:	RE: Trunkline OBA

Sharon

I'm not sure Sheila is the one for sign off.
Also, I'm not sure we have our act together.
We need to do that before the draft goes out.
I am especially concerned about the suggested tolerances.
Given our recent discussions, they may be too low.
If anything, it seems like they are less then the recent Shelley/Mike guidelines.
(Maybe we need some more "official" guidelines.)
If Trunkline sees these numbers, it may be hard to change the tolerances.
Finally, Shelley and Mike may be concerned if we sent it out without their comments.
I will continue to press for input.

Frazier

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Sharon
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:17 PM
To:	King Jr., Frazier
Subject:	RE: Trunkline OBA

Why can't we just get Sheila's signoff.    It isn't like we are doing anything radical here.   Trunkline hasn't even seen it yet, so they might make more changes --- it's just our standard GISB agreement.   I think Trunkline should actually review before Shelley anyway.   (for discussion purposes)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:45 PM
To:	Farrell, Sharon
Subject:	Trunkline OBA

Sharon,

I have placed several calls to Shelley about the Trunkline OBA.
I have not heard back and she is not in today.
So, I just sent the draft to Mike to get his input.

Frazier


Please find attached this week's publication of the Global Markets Monitor
for 08 December 2000.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda and
Gwyn Koepke


This article stems from confidential docs submitted to the Governor's office,
which were leaked to the press.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/02/2001 09:54 AM -----

	smara@enron.com
	Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
	05/02/2001 09:51 AM
	Please respond to smara

		 To: smara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by smara@enron.com.

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

By JEFF GERTH and LOWELL BERGMAN

 uke Energy, a power-generating company accused of overcharging
customers millions of dollars during California's year-old energy
crisis, has secretly offered Gov. Gray Davis a deal that it hopes
will solve its legal problems while helping to calm the state's
chaotic electricity markets.

 The proposed settlement, outlined in documents prepared in March
by Duke's lawyers, calls for an end to various state
investigations, private lawsuits and state complaints to federal
authorities accusing Duke of overcharging.

 In return, Duke would make an unspecified "appropriate payment"
but admit no wrongdoing.

 "Duke is committed to sharing pain" and "expediting high-level
confidential discussions that would embrace the governor's
political and public relations needs," according to the documents,
which were given to The New York Times by someone who wanted the
issue aired publicly.

 Governor Davis acknowledged the secret discussions in an interview
in San Francisco yesterday, and said he hoped to meet with more
generators soon. But he insisted that none of the companies would
escape a substantial payment because, he said, they have penalized
the state with excessive prices.

 "My general approach to the energy companies is that you have
already charged the utilities a 50 percent credit penalty for the
power they were buying from you," Mr. Davis said, so "you're going
to have to have a very substantial reduction" in what the companies
are owed.

 Mr. Davis said Duke had walked in with "a number of demands,"
including an end to state inquiries but that that was not likely to
happen.

 "We're not about to call off the dogs," said the governor, a
Democrat who will seek re-election next year.

 Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is a major investor in
California's wholesale electricity market, having spent more than
$1 billion since the state opened its generating plants to outside
operators in 1996.

 It is also near the top of the list of companies accused of
overcharging. Duke has been ordered by federal regulators to
justify or refund $20 million in disputed charges this year, an
amount that is third-highest among federally regulated companies in
the California market.

 By entering secret negotiations with Mr. Davis and being the first
generator to settle, Duke could gain a public-relations advantage,
in much the same way that the Liggett Group donned a white hat by
being the first company to open talks with the state governments in
the tobacco-litigation wars.

 "We've just simply tried to be part of the solution," Richard B.
Priory, Duke's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview,
adding that the company was "offering ideas" and "throwing in
suggestions."

 Publicly, Mr. Davis has disparaged out-of-state electricity
generators before and after he began talking with them privately.
In an interview two weeks ago with The Los Angeles Times, he called
the generators "the biggest snakes on the planet Earth" for their
pricing practices.

 California's electricity costs have risen to about $28 billion
last year from $7 billion in 1999. By some estimates, they could
approach $70 billion this year * $2,000 for every resident. The
state has stepped in to buy power for financially crippled
utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric, which is now in
bankruptcy court.

 The Davis administration has struck power deals with companies
like Duke in hopes of securing a stable and affordable source of
power. To pay those bills, Mr. Davis is seeking the largest
municipal bond issue in American history, $12 billion, although
some state officials privately estimate that the final amount will
be higher.

 The governor hopes the bond issue will eventually take the state's
taxpayers off the hook. But how those costs are allocated among
ratepayers, utilities and generators, and whether the bond issue
can even succeed, remain unanswered questions. A major impediment
to resolving the electricity crisis, according to state officials,
utility executives and economists, is the secrecy surrounding the
administration's negotiations.

 Several Republicans have sued the Davis administration to learn
the terms of specific contracts entered into by the state. On
Monday, the administration released a 67-page financial analysis,
including its most detailed disclosure about the overall costs of
state electricity contracts. Last week Republicans blocked
legislation that Mr. Davis says he needs to pass the bond issue.
The bill could come up for a vote later this week.

 "The thing that has hindered Governor Davis the most among the
legislative ranks is the demand for secrecy over the negotiations
and the agreements that have been reached," said Senator Joseph L.
Dunn, a Democrat from Santa Ana and the chairman of a select
committee investigating the price spikes.

 Mr. Davis, in the interview, said there were legitimate commercial
reasons for keeping contract terms confidential.

 The political uncertainty has spilled over into the markets, where
the bonds would have to be sold. The state's credit rating, while
still solid, is slipping.

 Already companies that do business with California, like Duke, are
citing the state's creditworthiness as a reason for charging higher
prices in their dealing with the state, though the state has
stepped in as buyer since February.

 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently ordered
generators to justify high prices in California this year or pay
$125 million in refunds. The companies * including Duke, Reliant
Energy, Dynegy Inc. and the Williams Company * deny any wrongdoing
and cite the state's credit situation as one reason for the high
prices.

 Mr. Priory, the Duke chairman, said that resolution of credit
issues would lead his company to drop the so-called "credit
premium" it now charges on power sales. As of March 7, Duke was
owed more than $100 million by the state's power managers,
documents show.

 In its confidential submission to Mr. Davis and his aides, Duke
said it would "forgive an appropriate amount of certain
receivables, or make an appropriate payment based upon a
methodology that fairly represents its share of alleged
overcharges."

 The documents do not give an amount, but Duke's 2000 annual report
shows that its wholesale energy division had written off $110
million for power sales to California that had not been collected.
(Even with that write-off, the unit's profits before taxes doubled
from 1999 to 2000, and quadrupled for the first quarter of this
year.)

 Duke's "preliminary global settlement template" of March 9 goes
on: "Duke is committed to sharing pain with state and others on a
fair and equitable basis, without admitting legal liability,
because Duke has done nothing illegal."

 Duke says that much of its California power was sold last year on
the forward markets, not the more volatile and higher-priced spot
markets. But Mr. Priory also noted in his interview that at least
10 percent was sold for "whatever the market price is."

 On March 23, Duke's lawyer, at the request of Mr. Davis's legal
affairs secretary, forwarded to the governor's office additional
information about pending litigation involving Duke and its power
sales in California. The documents show that a top Duke priority is
the "prompt suspension of state investigations, lowering of
rhetoric and stay of state litigation," as well as the withdrawal
of state-related claims at the federal energy commission.

 Also in March, the operators of the state's power grid told the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that wholesale electricity
prices in California were more than $6 billion above competitive
prices over the previous 10 months. Duke has questioned the
methodology of that submission and wants the claim withdrawn.

 The inquiries of concern to Duke include those being conducted by
the office of the attorney general, William Lockyer, and the
California Public Utilities Commission.

 Barry P. Goode, the governor's legal affairs secretary, says he
subsequently referred Duke's lawyer to the attorney general's
office. The two state agencies say that their inquiries are
continuing. Sandra Michioku, a spokeswoman for Mr. Lockyer, said,
"Our investigation is ongoing."

 Loretta Lynch, the president of the utility commission, said in a
telephone interview yesterday, "The public utilities commission has
not been involved in any settlement discussions with generators and
our investigations into overcharges and withholding are ongoing and
strong."

 The Duke documents say the company should be given preferential
treatment for its conciliatory stance.

 Other generators said they were not involved in settlement
discussions with Mr. Davis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02DAVI.html?ex=989822260&ei=1&en=70
3c8bd8125d53df

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


guys, please ensure that this is handled.

Regards
Delainey
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Timme [mailto:atimme@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:10 PM
To: kimberly.r.brown@enron.com
Cc: Brown, Daniel; Pagan, Ozzie; Delainey, David W.
Subject: Alan Timme Expense Report

Kimberly, I was laid off on Monday and have not had my latest expense report electronically deposited into the credit union.  I was assured by management that I would be paid.  The amount is 642.10.  I would think that this is the least enron could do for me since I have only worked for EES for 2 months.

Please ensure that my funds are deposited as soon as possible due to my current financial crisis.

Thank You,

Alan Timme
(713) 592-8535


Cheryl,

It is my understanding that HPL made a decision in 1998, for commericial
reasons, to adopt the GISB Gas Day that all interstate pipelines are required
to observe.  See definition below.  I know that the transportation contract
have been revised to reflect the 9:00 am Central Clock Time convention.  As
to the termination letter issue raised in your letter, I'm assuming that you
are working that out with Shawna Flynn.

Steve Van Hooser

Gas Industry Standards Board Business Practice Standards
Standards and Models Relating To Nominations, Flowing Gas, Invoicing,
Electronic
Delivery Mechanisms, Capacity Release Contracts
Interpretations
Book 1 of 2
Containing Principles, Definitions, Standards and Models
Version 1.4
August 31, 1999
Standards:
1.3.1 Standard time for the gas day should be 9 a.m. to 9 a.m. (central clock
time).

	Cheryl Dudley
	10/02/2000 03:17 PM

		 To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Clarification of "First of the Month" Termination Date

Unless there have been recent changes of which I am unaware, a "gas day" runs
from 8:00 a.m. on one day until 8:00 a.m. on the next day.  Based on this
premise, I need to get a clarification of what you actually mean when you do
a termination letter stating that a contract will be terminated on the first
of a particular month.

As the systems currently work, if a termination date is entered as the first
of any month, the deal is rolled over in Sitara for the ENTIRE month.

If Sitara was changed to better read the dates from Global Contracts, it
would still roll the deal over & allow gas to flow through the 1st (which
would actually be until 8:00 a.m. on the 2nd).

When you terminate a contract on the first of any month:

Do you mean that gas should only flow through the end of the previous month
(which would end at 8:00 a.m. on the 1st of the next month)?

or

Do you mean that gas should flow through the end of the 1st day of the month
(which would end at 8:00 a.m. on the 2nd of the month)?

or

Can it be either, based on the individual situation?  (If so, please explain.)

Please let me know your views on this issue.  I have requested the IT group
to change all of the "1st of a month" termination dates in Global Contracts
to the last day of the previous month in order to prevent Sitara from
assuming that the deal is good for the entire next month.  But, before they
act on this request, we want to make sure that we are interpreting the
meaning correctly.

Thanks in advance for your help.


Attached is a revised version of the memo I sent to each of you last night.
Chuck pointed out an area of confusion in the previous memo which I have
attempted to clarify in this revised version.

Please let me know your thoughts.

TFAH

 - 1190070.01


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/16/2001>, published as of 11/16/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

PRELIM


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 06:05
PM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer%JONESDAY@JonesDay.com> on 08/28/2000 09:13:11
AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Petition for Approval of Master Natural Gas Contract

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

This is the draft Petition sent by Peoples on Friday. I don't see youor
name listed on their distribution list. Gregg Penman has one. I sent
comments in a separate e-mail.
---------------------- Forwarded by Boyd J. Springer/JonesDay on 08/28/2000
09:11 AM ---------------------------

a.browne@pecorp.com on 08/25/2000 09:50:50 AM
Extension:

To:   t.hermann@pecorp.com, bjspringer@jonesday.com
cc:   r.delara@pecorp.com, k.donofrio@pecorp.com, s.fiorella@pecorp.com,
      v.grace@pecorp.com, s.halfin@pecorp.com, m.klyasheff@pecorp.com,
      w.morrow@pecorp.com, j.nassos@pecorp.com, d.wear@pecorp.com,
      t.zack@pecorp.com, g.fox@pecorp.com
Subject:  Petition for Approval of Master Natural Gas Contract

Please forward comments to Jerry Fox.

 <<Pet. for Approval of Master Nat. Gas K>>    <<Docket 00-0000 PGL
Petition with MEH (Buy-sell)>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

(See attached file: Pet. for Approval of Master Nat. Gas K.doc)
(See attached file: Docket 00-0000 PGL Petition with MEH (Buy-sell).doc)

 - Pet. for Approval of Master Nat. Gas K.doc
 - Docket 00-0000 PGL Petition with MEH (Buy-sell).doc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Alice

Date:		5/4/2001
Time:		8:30 AM - 9:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


This is to confirm a meeting for tomorrow, Tuesday, July 11 at 2:00 pm.
Please reference the meeting as Systems Meeting and also note that there will
be a follow up meeting.   The meeting will be held in EB3321.

Call Kim Hillis at x30681 if you have any questions.

k


I'm glad to hear that everything is good.  I'm so excited for you, you'll be
a wonderful mother!

XXOO


While I totally agree with the decision to show an EGS/International operating budget for the full year. However,  I am concerned that we do not have recommendations for the OTC regarding divestitures.  I would think we would want to sit down with Andy and Jeff and go through the inventory of companies in order to put a divestiture plan in place.

I would like to get a feel from the OTC of how much pain they are willing to accept to sell down some of these assets.  The schedule that Louie handed out the other day may have been a good start but I doubt all of that can be accomplished within the 2002 time frame.

I believe the we are going to have to commit to the financial community a sell-down number and how much cash that raises.  I think this really needs to be part of EGS & Corporate Development's 2002 stategy.

I wanted to get your thoughts prior to setting up a meeting.


Another trivial counterparty name change - it's Enmax Energy Corp., not just
plain old Enmax Corp. These deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:52 AM
---------------------------
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enmax

Rhonda,

You are correct!

Rhonda L Denton@ECT
03/14/2001 03:40 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Enmax

540039, 541695, 541715, and 541737 are booked to Enmax Corporation.  I think
they should be booked to Enmax Energy Corporation.  Wendy Conwell in credit
has prepared a credit work sheet on this CP so I believe this is the correct
entity.  Can you check?


Attached is the spreadsheet Raetta put together after receiving all of the billing information to
	review the parties involved in the 3.0 bcf long to the pipe position on NNG for October, 2001.
	If you have any questions, let Raetta or I know.

	Sue, the Pinnacle Natural Gas imbalance is the 5,000/day balancing Pinnacle is allowed
	before volumes go to park and ride. Thanks. Lynn


Sally--

I'm pretty sure that I saw your name on my calendar sometime this week to
talk about Glenn Surowiec, but then it disappeared.  I would be happy to let
you know how he's done (he was pre-ranked in Superior at EBS, so I imagine
you're going to need some ammunition.)  Since I will be in the meeting as
well, I can speak up when details need to get hashed out.  If I mistakenly
missed our appointment, I apologize.  Let me know if I can help.

See you Wednesday...
Brad Richter


Effective immediately Xochil Moreno has accepted an assistant position in
Anthony Dayao's area working with Jodi Dziadek in supporting his team.

Kim Ladish has transferred to us from EES and will be supporting myself as
well as Bryan Powell, Scott Williamson and their respective teams.  She is
located at EB2532B and her extension is 31900.

Please join me in welcoming Xochil and Kim into their new roles.