Please be sure that your desk is completely cleaned out and that there is NOTHING left in your area._______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
As you all know, our move is scheduled for this weekend.  Hopefully,  you and your groups are all progressing well in your preparations for the move this Friday. Please take the time to read the information contained in this message because most of the information contains reminders or FYI items and will be important to you and your group.  Please forward this to those in your group that may need this information.

?	Voicemail instructions - Please have everyone in your group clear all new voicemail messages by 5:00 PM, Friday, 11/16.  All saved messages, greetings and recorded names will be saved.  If a message is left before cutover the message will be saved, but the message light will not be displayed when you arrive.  As a precautionary meassure please check voice mail upon your arrival Monday morning even if the message light isn't on.

?	Building access - ECS will not be available for general access until Monday morning at 5:00 AM.  Due to the gas and power moves being combined, it is unlikely that the move team will be prepared for the POC's to come in on Sunday to unpack.  (Separate instructions will be generated for those who are needed to test trading applications.)  NOTE: Only those whose names have been approved and submitted to security will be allowed access on Sunday.
o	Monday - 5:00 AM for all employees

?	Security & badges -  All POC team members should be familiar with the routes into ECS as we discussed at our recent move meeting.  Please be sure to share this information with all of the people in your group.  If you need additional copies of the floor plans that have the access routes highlighted, please contact Carli Smith (5-3473). Please stress to everyone to have their badges with them at all times.  No one will be allowed access without their badge.  If anyone tries to access the building from the garage via the skyring and they do not have their badge, they will be sent back through the garage to the street level to walk across the street to the round kiosk in the Enron building lobby to get a guest pass and then proceed back to ECS via the 2nd floor and the skyring.

?	Move team colors - As mentioned at the move meeting, the following is a list of the color designations (vests) for the various teams that will be on the floor when we move in.
o	Red - Move Team
o	Orange - Desktop Support/IT
o	Green - Telephony

?	Newspaper subscriptions - The delivery location for all newspaper subscriptions need to be changed to ECS 05/06.  It is our intention to have all daily newspapers delivered to the mail desk located in the ECS 2nd floor corridor.  It will be the responsibility of the assistants to either pick up the papers for their group or designate someone in their group to pick up the papers.  If your papers continue to be delivered to your old floor of ECN, contact Sunny Rodgers (3-6116).

?	Move boxes -  Please encourage your group to pack and bring no more than about 6 boxes per person.  You may call Facilities (3-6300) if you need to request additional boxes.

?	Move labels -  If you run out of labels or if you are missing any labels, please call Carli Smith (5-3473) to have additional or missing labels printed.

?	Laptops - Important - Please ensure that all cable locks have been removed from all laptop computers by 5:00 PM on Friday.  If any cable locks are left on the computers they will be destroyed by the move team in order to move the computers as scheduled.

.	Bottled water - Every kitchen has an ice machine that also dispenses filtered water.  The large bottles of water (5 gallon) will not be allowed on the floor.  We would also like   to discourage the use of small bottles of water due to limited storage space and the availability of filtered water at several locations.

?	Phone sets - Although most of you are aware of this, we just wanted to remind you that there will be only one phone on each desk - either a turret or an Avaya, but not both.  Do not tag your phones, a new phone will be waiting for each person on their desk in the new building

I hope I have covered some of the outstanding questions or issues you might have, but if I have missed something, please let me know.  Thanks so much for all your help and hard work.


We have received the executed Non-Disclosure Agreement dated 11/20/00 between
the referencec Counterparty and Enron Net Works LLC and EnronOnline, LLC.  A
copy will be sent to Dave Samuels.


Just talked to Steve Jackson at AEP and it looks like they may want to use
DECAF to do intramonth confirmations.

We will have to come up with a way to confirm just certain deals and not all
deals.

I will add to the meeting for next week.

thanks

bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/18/2000 04:38 PM
To: paul.e.day@uk.arthurandersen.com @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: London Visit

Paul,

I shall be in London in the beginning of October.
I shall notify you about the timing of my trip later this week.

Vince

paul.e.day@uk.arthurandersen.com on 09/18/2000 03:29:50 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: London Visit

I understand this has been cancelled - no problem - life is kind of hectic
here
anyway!!  Why don't we try to rearrange next time you're over?

Kind regards

Paul Day

To:   Paul E. Day
cc:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Date: 25/08/2000 19:10
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject:  Re: London Visit

Paul,

Thanks for your message. I am in process of
finalizing my plans for the trip to London in the end of
September. I delayed  responding to you message till
I had more specific information.

Unless there a major change in my schedule, I shall arrive
in London on Monday morning (September 18) and  leave on
Thursday in the evening.

Please, let me know what would be convenient time
to meet. You can send me an E-mail message and my secretary
will contact to confirm the date and place of the meeting.
My assistant's name is Shirley Crenshaw and her phone
number is 713 853 5290.

I look forward to meeting you, Tom and Julian.

Vince Kaminski

paul.e.day@uk.arthurandersen.com on 08/25/2000 11:53:02 AM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   tom.o.lewthwaite@uk.arthurandersen.com,
julian.leake@uk.arthurandersen.com
Subject:  London Visit

I understand that you will be in London around 20 September.  Tom Lewthwaite
has
asked me to arrange a meeting between you, Tom and Julian Leake.  I understand
that you have met Tom and Julian before.   I would also like to attend - I am
a
manager in our UK Financial Services practice with responsibilty for Enron
from
a UK financial services perspective.  We would like to discuss any risk
management concerns that you may have and any internal initiatives with which
we
could assist.

If you are happy to meet on this basis, I would be grateful if you could let
me
know how you to proceed (whether I should arrange timings with you, your
secretary, someone in London etc).  You can contact me on +44 20 7783 7446 (at
Enron's London offices) or on this e-mail address.

Kind Regards

Paul Day

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


that is just gross


ISDA PRESS REPORT - THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2000

* Firms Alter Derivatives Use As Rule Change Looms - The Wall Street
Journal Europe
* OTC Derivatives Market Grows - Financial Times
* D.C. Bar Panelists Call for Tax Law Review In Wake of FASB Rule
Change on Derivatives - BNA, Inc.
* Ops Execs See Raised Profile - Operations Management
* UK Association Sets Up Think Tank - Operations Management

Firms Alter Derivatives Use As Rule Change Looms
The Wall Street Journal Europe - November 30, 2000
By Joe Niedzielski

Some big U.S. corporations are altering their use of derivatives in the
run-up to a new accounting rule that goes on the books next year, according
to a survey of senior financial executives released by Solution133.com LLC.

The basic findings of the survey of more than 100 senior executives at
Fortune 1000 companies confirm what some observers of the derivatives
markets have been saying for several months: Corporations will stick with
simple, or plain vanilla, derivatives instruments because of the complexity
and requirements of the new rule known as Financial Accounting Standard 133.

In its broadest form, FAS 133, requires corporations to report on their
balance sheets the fair market value of their holdings of derivatives and
that they be marked to market.

Corporations have publicly voiced their concerns in recent years that the
standard may result in significant earnings volatility and hurt their share
prices. That concern remains among the top issues for those corporate
executives surveyed by Solution133.com, an Internet-based resource of
information and tools that lets companies tackle the valuation, accounting
and reporting requirements of the new rule. Solution133.com is a joint
venture of PricewaterhouseCoopers and Gifford Fong Associates.

"Hopefully, all companies that produce U.S.-based GAAP (Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles) financial statements are evaluating their use of
derivatives and hedges, especially understanding the impact on earnings
volatility that could occur as a result of FAS 133," said Stan Friedman,
Solution133.com's chairman and chief executive officer.

The new standard has also been viewed by many observers as a spotlight into
the risk-management profiles of U.S. corporations. That's because the
standard also requires corporations to describe their risk-management
strategies and reasons for undertaking a particular hedge at its inception.
The correlation, or effectiveness, of the derivative with the hedged item
must also be tested.

Solution133.com said the results of the survey reflect an increasing concern
that these requirements expose a company to an unprecedented degree of
outside scrutiny. Not surprisingly, those corporations surveyed ranked
testing for hedge effectiveness, documenting risk-management strategies and
valuing derivatives as their three chief concerns with the new accounting
standard, though earnings volatility closely followed.

"Some of the large companies that we're dealing with are much more concerned
about doing the hedge effectiveness test than anything else," Mr. Friedman
said.  The survey also suggested that corporations will become more risk
adverse and alter their selection of derivatives.

"No longer able to defer gains or losses, companies are being forced to
review their derivative strategies and internal assessment of risk in more
detail," the Solution133.com report said. "Accounting requirements are top
of mind as executives evaluate their positions and many companies are
anticipating changes or adjustments in their earnings."

That has led to an increased focus on avoiding any speculative activity.
"The more exotic the instrument, the more likely the internal scrutiny on
its merits," the report said.

Of the 75% of the corporations surveyed that used derivative, many said they
would avoid more customized or targeted derivatives and stay with the plain
vanilla type until they fully understood the possibility of any earnings
ramifications.

OTC Derivatives Market Grows
Financial Times - November 30, 2000

The global over-the-counter derivatives market grew by almost 10 per cent in
value during the first half of this year, according to Swaps Monitor
Publications, a US research group. SMP said the notional size of the global
derivatives market grew to Dollars 103,900bn at the end of June 2000, an
increase of 9.8 per cent from Dollars 94,600bn in outstanding derivatives
transactions at the end of 1999.

Interest-rate swaps increased by 11.1 per cent in the first half of the year
to a total notional value of Dollars 58,500bn from Dollars 52,000bn at the
end of 1999.

The swaps, which involve the swapping of a fixed-interest rate payment for a
floating rate one on debts of same maturity and value, are increasingly
being used by investors as a means of hedging fixed-income investments.
Interest-rate options remained unchanged at Dollars 12,300bn, while
interest-rate forwards grew to Dollars 8,600bn from Dollars 8,300bn.  The
figures are compiled from databases of about 120 global OTC derivatives
dealers.

D.C. Bar Panelists Call for Tax Law Review In Wake of FASB
Rule Change on Derivatives
BNA, Inc. - November 29, 2000

The Democratic chief tax counsel for the House Ways and
Means Committee said Nov. 28 he thought Congress should review the taxation
of derivatives in view of changes to the accounting rules for reporting of
gains and losses from derivatives.

John Buckley spoke at a program on derivatives presented by the D.C. Bar
Section on Taxation Committee on Financial Instruments and Products. Other
speakers included Mark Price and Steve Rosenthal of KPMG, and Chuck Wheeler
of Alston & Bird.

Price said Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, adopted in 1998 by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board and amended in June (118 DTR G-7,
6/19/00), requires separate accounting for derivatives, using a
mark-to-market approach like that used under Internal Revenue Code Section
475. The new rule requires that any change in the value of the derivative be
"booked"--included as a gain or loss in determining the company's income for
financial accounting purposes--even if the company has not disposed of the
derivative.

The result, Price said, is to create increased volatility in the company's
determination of income and loss for accounting purposes. Wheeler said that
companies do not want this increased volatility to apply to their
determinations of income for tax purposes.

Price said the accounting profession adopted new standards for derivatives
because of numerous problems, including:
* incomplete reporting, in that some companies reported no information
or reported information only in a footnote;
* inconsistent reporting, in that companies used different rules for
determining cost and value;
* difficulty in applying the accounting rules; and
* lack of transparency, in that companies took different approaches in
their treatment of derivatives,
meaning income was not determined under the same rules and
information on financial statements could not be compared with reliability.

Issues for Congress to Study

Buckley said the mark-to-market approach is slowly being
adopted in the tax system. He said it was not something he favored across
the board but in his view it made sense for the tax system to apply the
mark-to-market approach to derivatives. He said the problems identified by
Price in accounting for derivatives also applied to the tax system--there is
uncertainty and inconsistency.

Buckley also said it would simplify recordkeeping to conform
the tax system to the accounting approach, and he favored Congress looking
at this question. He said that Congress's adoption of the mark-to-market
approach for securities in the early 1990s was the right approach, and he
thought that the Financial Accounting Standards Board had taken an
"interesting and important step" in adopting FAS 133.

Buckley said he sees the problem of defining a derivative as
a major issue for the tax law, and questioned whether the accounting
definition was "workable." Other panelists said it is, but Price noted that
the definition is very fact-specific, and Wheeler said the rules are so new
it is too early to tell whether companies will attempt to structure
transactions to use the accounting definition.

Buckley said an additional issue would be whether gains and
losses from derivatives should be treated as capital or ordinary under a
mark-to-market approach.

Hedge Accounting Reduces Volatility

Wheeler said that some companies show reserves on their
financial statements to account for potential losses in value, but that this
is not generally used for tax reporting. Rosenthal said a current Tax Court
case involves the Internal Revenue Service disputing a company's use of a
"credit adjustment" to reduce income.

Price said the rules allow companies to elect to use "hedge
accounting." He said a company which recognized gain or loss from a
derivative identified as a hedge could have an offsetting gain or loss from
the item being hedged. Thus, hedge accounting reduces the volatility created
by FAS 133 for companies that hedge their risk. However, FAS 133 contains a
strict definition for a hedge, and an item could lose its character as a
hedge because the definition is reapplied every quarter to the same item.
The panelists noted that for tax purposes, once an item is considered a
hedge, its character would not change subsequently.
Price said the new FASB rule applies to entities that report
to the Securities Exchange Commission and are effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2001, for companies reporting on
a calendar year.

Ops Execs See Raised Profile
Operations Management - November 27, 2000

Operations and technology executives are taking on a larger role within
firms and ate receiving more senior job titles as a result, according to a
Russell Reynolds Associates study to be released this week. "The head of
operations is no longer just a senior v.p., but is now at the partner
level," said George Wilbanks, partner with Russell Reynolds.

The shift has been prompted by a number of factors, including the blurring
of lines between banks, insurers,
mutual fund firms and other financial services companies, and the growing
importance of multiple channels and the subsequent complexity of operations
and information. "Firms need much more robust technology and operations
platforms to handle the added complexity," Wilbanks said. The study - 2000
Recruiting Trends in Investment Management" - also found an increase in the
number of searches in operations, because many firms do not have someone in
place who can take on a more executive role.

U.K Association Sets Up Think Tank
Operations Management - November 27, 2000
.
The Computing Services and Software Association, the U.K. trade association
for the IT services and software sector, is establishing a think tank to
investigate applied technology in the financial and business sectors. The
idea originated with members, who were noticing the proliferation of
technology initiatives and wanted ways to navigate them, said Andrew Muir,
director of global securities solutions for Mercator, and chair of the
banking and finance group for CSSA.

With so many software initiatives, it is difficult for the industry to know
how to direct research and development to apply the evolving technology,
explained Muir. For example, SWIFT's SWIFTNet, the new Internet Protocol
based network, will impact on initiatives such as Continuous Linked
Settlement and the Global Straight Through Processing Association, Muir
said. The bi-monthly meetings will begin Dec. 14 in London and then white
papers will be issued to promote thought and provide direction to the
industry, Muir noted.

Muir will head up the soon-to-be-named think tank and will be joined by
Anthony Kirby, the ax-executive director of the GSTPA, who is now heading up
a team responsible for B2B at Bolero.net, and John Wilson, a director with
London-based consultancy CityIQ. There will also be senior representatives
from the leading securities firms, including Deutsche Bank and UBS Warburg,
and other vendors, an industry official noted.  Calls to Wilson and Kirby
were not returned.

End of ISDA Press Report for Thursday,  November 30, 2000.

THE ISDA PRESS REPORT IS PREPARED FOR THE LIMITED USE OF ISDA STAFF, ISDA'S
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED CONSULTANTS TO ISDA.  THIS PRESS REPORT IS
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION (EITHER WITHIN OR WITHOUT AN ORGANIZATION), AND ISDA IS
NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY USE TO WHICH THESE MATERIALS MAY BE PUT


Oludare Ogunmadewa
1919 East Beech road
Sterling, VA 20164
oludarebo@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Oludare Ogunmadewa


Attached is a marked version of the Assignment Agreement with our initial
comments.  In addition to the comments marked, we also have a few other
questions.

Although we do not object to it being mentioned twice, why is the lease
assigned pursuant to this Assignment Agreement when there is also a separate
lease assignment agreement?

How was the employment of the persons listed on Exhibit A to the Assignment
Agreemement effected?  Were they terminated or did they resign?  Is there any
documentation regarding this?

We may have further comments after review by Enron and our labor attorney.
Please call Cle at (713) 221-1314 or me at (713) 221-1131 with your comments.

Thanks.

Scott L. Miller
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
Phone (713) 221-1131
Fax (713) 222-3242
email:  smiller@bracepatt.com

 - Redline AMPS Assignment Agreement.doc


Looks good to me.

George left me a message looking for an update.  If you talk to him, would
you let him know that I sent the invoicing language to GE, but my contact
wasn't in the office.  I expect to hear from them soon.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/02/2001 05:24:04 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreements

 <<2SX801!.DOC>>

Kay:

We have enclosed for your review the initial draft of an amendment to the
letter agreement pertaining to CA Energy Development I LLC.  Please review
and advise of any comments at your convenience.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2SX801!.DOC


Is this the letter from Krimsky's buddies (I can't read it because I'm on my blackberry)? I thought this was Southern Company (I.e. the utility).
--------------------------
Ben Jacoby
(713) 853-6173

-----Original Message-----
From: "Gloria Castellanos" <gcastellanos@southernfacilities.com>@ENRON [NOTES:"Gloria Castellanos" <gcastellanos@southernfacilities.com>@ENRON]
To: Jacoby, Ben <Ben.Jacoby@ENRON.com>
CC: cabele <cabele@southernfacilities.com>
Sent: Mon Dec 17 14:51:04 2001
Subject: Purchase of Enron at South Florida

Thank you for your return phone call today, attached, please find an
electronic copy of the letter federal expressed to both you and Kay Mann
on Friday.

Please call me to discuss upon review.

Also, I would like to have a clear understanding of where you are with
respect to the December 9th payment on the Palm Beach ground lease.

Thank you in advance for your assistance. Look forward to speaking to
you tomorrow with the intention of moving this along.

Charles R. Abele, Jr.
Southern Facilities Development, Inc.
2901 SW 8th Street, Suite 204
Miami, FL 33135
Tel: (305) 541-3738
Fax: (305) 541-1314
cabele@southernfacilities.com


Ben,

Sorry, I sent old version. Use attached one below. Jin


Steve, Lou's write up is attached.  The issues accepted have the effect of
"bookending" the issue of the native load exception.  On the one end, the
states argue that FERC has no jurisdiction to impose open access on
transmission (bundled or unbundled) that is associated with the providers'
native load service.  On the other end, Enron argues that FERC has
jurisdiction over all transmission and it was error for FERC not to exercise
that jurisdiction once it had concluded that to do so was needed to eliminate
undue discrimination.

Joe Hartsoe deserves a lot of credit in being persistent on this because, had
Enron not petitioned, there is a scenario in which the Court would consider
only the negative side of the issue:  Was FERC authorized to do even the
little that it did?
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by bracepatt.com; Mon, 26 Feb 2001
10:39:07 -0600
Received: FROM dcex3.wilmer.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Mon Feb 26 10:47:51
2001 -0600
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: FROM dcex2.wilmer.com BY dcex3.wilmer.com ; Mon Feb 26 11:35:17
2001 -0500
Received: by dcex2.wilmer.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<15T7HGFJ>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:35:17 -0500
Message-ID: <C72E469FD563464EA42AC501F8CCB30704749473@dccl40.wilmer.com>
From: "Cohen, Louis" <LCohen@Wilmer.COM>
To: "Joe Hartsoe (E-mail)" <jhartso@enron.com>
Cc: "Jeffrey D. (Dan) Watkiss (E-mail)" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>,  "Killory,
Ted" <TKillory@Wilmer.COM>, "Palansky, IJay"  <IPalansky@wilmer.com>,
"Plotnick, Michael" <MPlotnick@wilmer.com>,  "Cohen, Louis"
<LCohen@Wilmer.COM>
Subject: Supreme Court Action in FERC Cases
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:35:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0A012.1A1432F0"

Here is a  summary.? I included the cites just in case.? Let me know if you
need  more.
?
The Supreme Court  today granted two petitions for certiorari to review the
D.C. Circuit's decision  in Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. FERC,
225 F.3d 667  (2000).? The Court granted the petition of New York and other
states (New  York?v. FERC, No. 00-568)) to consider?whether FERC may preempt
state  jurisdiction over transmission of energy from generators to retail
customers in  the same state.? (The Court declined other questions?New
York?had  raised.)? The Court also granted the petition of Enron Power
Marketing,  Inc. (EPMI v. FERC, No. 00-809) to consider whether FERC has
jurisdiction to  regulate all transmission in interstate commerce, including
transmission for  bundled retail sales, and whether FERC is obligated under
the Federal Power Act  to eliminate undue discrimination by requiring
transmission-owning utilities to  provide service on the same terms to all
users, including bundled retail  sales.? The cases will be argued together,
probably not before October  2001.


FYI.  May want to cover.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 10:33 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	03/29/2001 08:58 AM

		 To: <mmilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: US House panel sets April hearings on Calif crisis

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Wed, 28 Mar
2001 17:14:17 -0600 -----
To:	"Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Paul
Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	US House panel sets April hearings on Calif crisis
FYI

US House panel sets April hearings on Calif crisis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
     WASHINGTON, March 28 (Reuters) - The U.S. House Government Reform
Committee said Wednesday it would hold three field hearings in California
next month on the economic fallout from the state's chronic electricity
shortages.

     The hearings will take place on April 10 in Sacramento, April 11 in San
Jose, and April 12 in San Diego.

     California, which has struggled to keep the lights on since last autumn,
is widely expected to face blackouts during the peak power demand months of
the summer. On Tuesday, state regulators approved an average 40 percent
increase in consumer electricity rates to cover the soaring cost of energy
and pump more cash into the state's near-bankrupt utilities.

     "The energy crisis in California has ramifications for the entire
country, and it looks like it's going to get worse before it gets better,"
Rep. Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican who heads the panel, said in a
statement.

     "The problems are costing California's economy billions of dollars, and
that's going to affect the economy of the entire country," he added.

     The committee will hear testimony from power generators, utilities,
government entities, and local organizations.

     Neighboring states have complained that California's thirst for power
has boosted wholesale electricity prices throughout the western region,
forcing some energy-intensive businesses like paper mills and mines to
temporarily close.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Copyright , 2001 Reuters Limited.


Is Jeff available?

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
07:43 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
05/23/2001 03:17 PM
To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: NARUC Summer Committee Meeting

We should do it.,....and should check Ken or Jeff's availability.

From: Lisa Yoho on 05/23/2001 03:11 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NARUC Summer Committee Meeting

Steve and Rick:

I just received a call from NARUC's meeting coordinator, and she is putting
together a panel of speakers to address "what is needed to achieve a balanced
energy policy" at the summer committee meeting.   The panel will consist of 2
state commissioners, a consumer "type", an environmental advocate, and an
energy CEO.  She is interested in having someone from Enron on the panel,
which is scheduled for July 16th in Seattle.

Are we interested in doing this?

Lisa


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 08:43 AM -----

	Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/23/2001 06:41 PM

		 To: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Kaiser US/UK Setoff w/MG and ENA

Tracy:

Kaiser is hopeful that an answer on this can come quickly as they would like
to enter into the physical index deal as soon as tomorrow or Friday.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ngo, Tracy
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:17 PM
To: St Clair, Carol
Cc: Wolfe, Greg
Subject: Kaiser US/UK Setoff w/MG and ENA

Carol,

West power is looking to do a financial swap with Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical
Corporation ("Kaiser Aluminum") whereby Kaiser Aluminium would buy the swap
and pay ENA float.  Kaiser Aluminum International Inc. ("Kaiser
International") has a big market presence in the UK and MG has significant
forward financial and physical metals positions with Kaiser International
which I believe are quite out-of-the-money.

Can we find out whether or not we can perform a bilateral, affiliate NETTING
AGREEMENT between Kaiser International and Kaiser Aluminum with MG and EPMI?
If the UK is going to continue to do short-term new metals business with
Kaiser International and if we can get comfortable with metals forward
positions that are OTM, we would like to use this position and leverage off
of it for trading liquidity in the states.  Secondly, does the netting need
to just pertain to global financial business or can it include physical as
well?

If possible, I'd like to see if you and a UK trading attorney can speak about
the overall concept and briefly address any UK and domestic law conflicts.
Please call when you have a opportunity to discuss.  ENA is looking to enter
into a power swap for June '01.  I'm not sure if this concept is achievable,
and if it is, in the time frame we're facing.  However, if we can't do a June
swap, then we'll try for a July swap.

Regards,
Tracy


Colleen, we still show the 1,000 dt/day of Equitrans capacity on our CES (now
New Power) sheet.  Do you know if CES ever agreed to take this contract?


Here is the best information I have.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
15/02/2000 10:32 AM ---------------------------
cc:
Subject: Holiday Schedule

Please see attached holiday schedule for year 2000.


Thanks.  I got Jim's and Eric's right after lunch.  Jim was definitely not impressed but he said we would talk tomorrow.  Eric seemed disappointed but I think if we can bump his retention from $50,000 to $75,000 per six months, I think I can get him over the hump.  He is great value if we can get him for that.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:18 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Cc:	Whalley, Greg
Subject:	RE: The Natives are Getting Restless

We will have employment contracts done soon and employment letters to those not getting employment contracts by tommorrow or Saturday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:07 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	The Natives are Getting Restless

John,

You or Greg need to address the various groups with whatever generic information you can as to where we are in the process, expected timeline, hurdles before start up again, starting VAR and general organizational structure.  People are moving from frustration to feeling insulted that they are expected to sit still with no information.  I know you have a lot on your plate but if we really want people to hang in there a little longer before we address each individual's situation they need some sense of when they can expect closure.

Tom


This is Steve Kean's PAB


Hi Gang,
?
Here is the contact info for the trip.?
?
We will be staying at Alpine Ridge #24A.?  Direct telephone to condo is
970-728-5564.
?
Contact at Alpine Lodging:?  970-728-3388.
?
You already have the flights but here they are so  you can print and
distribute accordingly:
?
American West Flight 2763 Dec. 9 @6:05  a.m.
????????????????????????????????  Houston to Phoenix
??????  "??????????  "?????? "??? 6360 Dec. 9 @ 10:00  a.m.
?????????????????????????????????Pheonix  to Telluride arrive 11:47 a.m.
?
??????  "???????????  "?????? "??? 6241 Dec. 14?@ 9  a.m.
?????????????????????????????????  Montrose, Colo. to Phoenix
??????  "????????????  "?????? "?? 2273 @ 1:15  p.m.
??????????????????????????????????Phoenix?to
?????????????????????????????????  Houston???????
?????????????????????????????????  arrive 4:50 p.m.
??????????????????????????????????????????


Hedging for coal and oil price risk.


Effective: We have a new system to prepare expense reports called:

Expense Reporting System:  XMS

In order for us (your assistants) to prepare your expense reports you will
need
to log on the system and give us your permission.  I will provide you step by
step
instructions to do so.  I will make it as easy as possible.  It is very
important
that you do this otherwise we will not have access or permission.

(1)  LOGGING ON TO THE SYSTEM:
                Log on to xms.enron.com and enter your logon ID and password.
                 (Your log on ID is your P00 # or your NT ID and your
password is ENRON)
(2)  SELECTING APPROVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
                 Select MY INFO button-Then go to Concur Expense tab and
select WORKFLOW.
                     Click on the spyglass to pick your approver (your
manager) then your Administrative Asst.
                                          Be sure to SAVE YOUR SELECTION.
(3) CHANGING YOUR PASSWORD
                 Select MY INFO button-Then select MY PROFILE-Then CHANGE
PASSWORD
                  (Type in your old password twice)  ( If you forget your
password call 31411.)
(4)  CREATING AN EXPENSE REPORT (If you decide you would like to prepare your
own expense report)
                 Select MY WORKSPACE tab, then CREATE EXPENSE REPORT.  Fill
in required fields.
                Select next button
(5)   APPROVING A REPORT
             An email message will notify you of a report pending your
approval.  You can click on the hotlink
             to logon to XMS system.  Approve at  summary level by clicking
on the approval button for the
             Home Page.  Or double click on the title of the expense report
to preview the details.

TO LEARN MORE GO TO THE XMS WEB PAGE:  http://xms.enron.com


Thanks for the note.  I am glad that you are enjoying Portland.  I am still
on the 30th floor, so do drop by sometime when you are in town.  I would love
to see you.  --Sally


I'm sorry my response has been such a long time coming on this issue, but
I've visited with almost every department in our office trying to figure out
what happened to this deal. Basically, Idaho got their scheduled cut by the
Cal-ISO, which in turn means we have to cut our schedule flowing to Idaho. So
Jeremy Morris, one of our California schedulers, cut the first Idaho deal he
found and passed the remainder of the schedule to Real Time to fill, which
they did in a separate deal. So EPMI and Idaho are in agreement that the
schedule got cut, but that we kept them whole by selling the remainder to
Idaho in the hour-ahead market.

Now the question is, how do we confirm the deal? From your side, is it better
if we leave the deal as-is, or restore it to the original 25 mw off peak and
kill the real time deal (which wouldn't really be an accurate representation
of what happened)? Just let me know, and we'll do what we can to help.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/02/2001 12:00 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 565759.01

Kate, please check, deal 565759.01, I verballed the trade with APB on Friday
3/30/01
Enron Sells Idaho
4/2-4/2
220.00    total mw s400
sp 15

Looks like it has been changed, each hour a different mw.
Please let me know the details.
Thanks
Stephanie


Corey,

Thanks.  Was the doc based on any previous Enron transactions?

Thanks,

Kay


I'm pretty sure this is going in across the board for US deals.  If you guys
want to, I have no objection.  We came up with some language to insert into
the first paragraph of the confirm indicating that it is subject to the GTC
and incorporating it by reference.  Bob Bowen has the final version of the
language (I think it varied slightly between various commodities).

Just as a 'heads up' we are also starting down the road of doing away with
confirmations altogether for certain US EnronOnline transactions.  Maybe we
should chat about that and I can give you all the details.  It's going to be
a lengthy and painful process.

	Greg Johnston
	04/25/2001 09:51 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EnronOnline GTC's

Mark, I wanted to get your thoughts on whether ECC can implement this online
GTC policy for its financial and physical transaction completed through EOL.
I would suspect that, if ENA has passed on this, it should be okay for ECC to
follow suit.  Are you implementing this policy just on the financial
transactions or across the board?

Let me know.

Thanks
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT on 04/25/2001 08:40
AM ---------------------------

Dianne Seib
04/23/2001 01:42 PM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline GTC's

Peter and Greg,

Attached below is more information on the subject of Online GTC's.  This will
affect the financial transactions we confirm as ENA as we are currently using
ENA's templates for these transactions.  Can we implement this change for our
ECC financial transactions as well as for physical transactions?

Let me know.

Dianne
---------------------- Forwarded by Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT on 04/23/2001 01:16
PM ---------------------------

Bob Bowen
04/23/2001 12:53 PM
To: Charlie Hoang/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie
Lee/Enron@EnronXGate, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/Enron@EnronXGate, Ron
Nolte/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: EnronOnline GTC's

Good News!  We finally received approval of the language to be used for
EnronOnline transactions
subject to General Terms & Conditions so that we do not have to attached the
GTC's to every
confirmation sent.  Again, the language attached is for particular products,
so please check with your
respective legal groups to get their approval.

I would like to start this process next Monday, April 30, 2001.  Can everyone
meet that deadline?  If
this does not affect you, please reply so.

Attached is the final language (don't let the file name fool you):


Attached [finally] is Calpine's revisions to the Exhibit "C" to the Operating
Agreement at the South Point project.  These revisions are intended by
Calpine to be consistent with the discussions here in Houston during our p.m.
meeting on Monday, Oct. 16.

Please review the Exhibit with careful attention to the impact of the revised
operating parameters on TW's linepack (particularly the plant's variable
operations) during the day.  If possible, could I see a preliminary
determination of the acceptability of this revised exhibit by week's end?
Thanks.


Attached for your review are draft IEP Comments in  Response to the
Commission Order on the California market structure.?These  comments are due
on Nov. 22.? These comments have built off the outline  previously discussed,
as well as Jan Smutny-Jones "Statement to FERC" circulated  last week.? These
comments continue to be a work in progress, as we prepare  for the actual
filing next week.
?
As previously arrange, IEP is convening a  conference call at 10:00 a.m.(PST)
on Monday, Nov. 20 to discuss these  comments.? The call-in numbers will be
circulated on  Friday.
 - 001116_IEP_Comments_EL00-95_draft4.doc


<http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/001.ht3.jpg>
Energy Info Source's U.S. Transmission Report is a 550-page, 4 part report which provides all you need to know about the fast changing transmission industry. The report takes a wide-ranging look at changes in the structure of the business, assesses current and projected reliability issues, examines how transmission is effecting bulk power markets, and analyzes the FERC-mandated RTO filings.
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/ustran1.jpg>
Now in its 15th year of publication, Wheeling & Transmission Monthly is the only source of comprehensive information on transmission and bulk power filings at the FERC. Every filing at FERC during the past month is summarized, complete with docket number for pulling the entire file. The most important filings are featured in "Bulk Power Highlights." WTM also covers the key decisions at FERC, and stories at the Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators. It is a continuing update to your U.S. Transmission Industry Report. Normally $345, it is FREE with your order of the U.S. Transmission Report. Delivered in pdf format by email. Published by the Power Marketing Association.
Click Here to Download Ordering Information, a Complete Table of Contents and a Free Issue of Wheeling & Transmission Monthly <http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=9xr4vqn6.6t9wqqn6.hbw4vqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pmaconference.com%2Ftransinfo.pdf>
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/001.ht4.gif>

The History of Transmission in the U. S.
The Impact of FERC Orders 888 and 889
FERC's Push Toward RTOs through the Merger Approval Process
Discussion of the Creation of TransCos
Detailed Analysis of FERC Order 2000
Detailed Discussion, Analysis, and Comparison of October 15 RTO Filings -- including Innovative Rate Treatments
Discussion of Current ISOs and Projections on their Jan. 15 RTO Filings
Listing of FERC Dockets and Policy Statements Regarding RTOs
Maps of Proposed TransC0 and RT0 Territories

  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/001.ht5.gif>

Review of NERC's 2000 Reliability Assessment
Review of FERC Investigation of Bulk Power Markets
Discussion of California's Wholesale Market Problems
Analysis of Pricing Trends and Price Caps in ISOs
FERC Action On October 15th RTO Filings
Detailed Discussion, Analysis, and Comparison of January 15 RTO Filings
Tables of Regional Demand and Capacity

  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/002.ht8.gif>

Analysis of FERC Conditional Approval of GridSouth TransCo
GridSouth's Request for Clarification on FERC Order
Analysis of FERC Conditional Approval of GridFlorida TransCo
Analysis of FERC Rejection of Southern Company's SeTrans GridCo
Analysis of FERC Directed Changes to Southwestern Power Pool/Entergy Hybrid RTO Proposal
Update on Alliance and Midwest ISO Settlement
Analysis of FERC Conditional Approval of RTO West

  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000013/ustran1.gif>

History of FERC RTO Activities
Analysis of Southeastern RTO Mediation Report
Analysis of Northeastern RTO Mediation Report
Update on RTOs - Alliance and Midwest
Update on TransCos - ITC, TransLink, and WestConnect

Click Here to Download Ordering Information, a Complete Table of Contents and a Free Issue of Wheeling & Transmission Monthly <http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=9xr4vqn6.6t9wqqn6.hbw4vqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pmaconference.com%2Ftransinfo.pdf>
This email was sent to those who signed up for it. If you believe it has reached you in error, or you are no longer interested in receiving it, then please click here <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=kam.keiser@enron.com> to edit your preferences.


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 04:06 PM
---------------------------

Don Miller
08/29/2000 04:02 PM
To: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Teaser


Barry and Stephanie, I'll check on this when I get in in the morning.  I have a faint recollection that copies of the agreement were included in PGT's filing, but I may have it confused with another proceeding.  I was going to check it out from home but changed my mind when I discovered that the RIMS copy of the filing is over 900 pages!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wed 7/25/2001 6:07 PM
To: Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Miller, Stephanie
Cc: Grigsby, Mike
Subject: RE: Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

Steph./ Becky .. is there a possibility that there is a condition precedent "out" clause to Newport Gen regarding rolled in vs incremental tariff ( incl.) fuel that would allow them to not have to take on this transportation?  If so, this could affect the Malin Supply out of Nov 2002. Is there any way that we can see the TA's that were filed with FERC that underpinned the 2002 expansion?

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:   Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:19 PM
To:     Miller, Stephanie
Cc:     Tycholiz, Barry; Steffes, James D.; Lawner, Leslie; Nicolay, Christi
Subject:        RE: Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

Yep - in fact, they did.  I just haven't got around to summarizing the order yet.  Here's some excerpts:

"We reach no determination regarding whether PG&E Transmission's system-wide cost of fuel will increase above the current cost, since the outcome depends on numerous factors, such as the total pipeline volumes transported and the price of fuel.  Instead, as discussed below, and in accordance with Enron's request [way to go, FERC!!], we will act to insulate existing shippers from increased fuel costs attributable to the proposed expansion."

After suggesting that it would have been more appropriate to calculate fuel costs by using the average of the latest twelve months of actual data in place of the theoretical maximum rate, FERC directed "PG&E Transmission to design a surcharge to ensure that expansion shippers are subject to an incremental fuel charge for fuel costs above the costs attributable to fuel absent the proposed addition of 97,500 horsepower of compression.  In addition, PG&E must indicate compliance with this condition whenever it files to adjust its compressor fuel surcharge and whenever it files its annual gas fuel reimbursement reports." (emphasis added)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Miller, Stephanie
Sent:   Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:48 PM
To:     Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Cc:     Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:        RE: Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

Do you think the Commission would apply this same principal to PGT's 2002 expansion?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:   Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:36 PM
To:     Miller, Stephanie; South, Steven P.; Gay, Randall L.; Sullivan, Patti; Allen, Phillip K.; Shireman, Kristann; Superty, Robert; Calcagno, Suzanne; McMichael Jr., Ed; Smith, George F.; Grigsby, Mike

Cc:     Nicolay, Christi; Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James D.; Canovas, Guillermo; Pharms, Melinda; Kaufman, Paul; Fulton, Donna

Subject:        Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

According to the Draft Order that was voted out at the Commission meeting today, the subject project, as amended to reflect the approval of the California Action Project, is approved, subject to certain conditions including restrictions on rolled-in rate treatment.

The Commission was concerned that the additional fuel costs could exceed the rate reduction to existing shippers.  Kern River's projections were based on a $3.00/dth cost of gas.  The Commission conditioned its approval of rolled-in rate treatment by providing that, "in its future compliance tariff filing to roll-in the costs and lower transmission rates, Kern River must submit revised exhibits showing the excess revenues over the incremental cost-of-service, and the net benefits after anticipated fuel costs are considered" (Kern River's settlement in RP99-274 requires it to reduce its rates for existing customers coincident with the in-service date for newly certificated facilities if it receives approval for rolled-in rate treatment).  Additionally, if during any year, the combined level of the electric and gas fuel expenses exceed the benchmark level(s) of excess revenues established in the tariff filing, then Kern River must allocate the excess portion of fuel costs to its expansion shippers.  Thus, Kern River must always assure that this expansion does not increase costs for existing shippers.

The Commission rejected concerns of the existing firm shippers as well as SoCal Gas about the potential for additional curtailment at Wheeler Ridge.  The Commission found that the potential for increased curtailment did not warrant rejection or modification of Kern River's proposal, in part because SoCal Gas does not offer firm service on its system and therefore existing shippers have never had any assurance that Socal Gas would accept their gas.

The Draft Order is 49 pages long.  Please advise if you would like a hard copy.


Dana -

Thanks for your comments.  As to the name, that is taken care of.  As to
Paragraph 2, I believe the language merely requires that the fact that
disclosure of the Confidential Information (CI) has been made, that a review
of the CI is underway or that discussions between the parties are underway
(including the status of these discussions) are the only things prohibited by
this provision.  It does not say that the existence of the agreement cannot
be disclosed.  If there is any particular part that you find objectionable,
let's talk about it as this is a provision that is fairly standard for Enron
and carries some importance.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	"Dana C. Grogan" <dcgrogan@cmsenergy.com>
	05/11/2001 08:52 AM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc: "Debbie T. Adams" <dtadams@cmsenergy.com>, Stephen.Abbanat@enron.com,
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
		 Subject: NDA - CMS Energy - Panhandle Pipe Line Companies

  This agreement should be in the name of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company.

We want to strike item #2.  The language provides that we will not disclose
the "existence" of the confidentiality agreement.  Normally, we only agree
not to disclose the confidential information.

If these changes are acceptable, we will be ready to arrange a meeting.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Dana Grogan
dcgrogan@cmsenergy.com
(713) 989-7230

Tana.Jones@enron.com on 04/03/2001 01:10:13 PM

To:   tsmehta@cmsenergy.com
cc:   Stephen.Abbanat@enron.com, Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject:  NDA - CMS Energy - Panhandle Pipe Line Companies

At the request of Stephen Abbanat, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   We would appreciate it if you could please
verify whether "CMS Energy-Panhandle Pipe Line Companies" is the correct
legal name of your company.  If you have any comments or questions, please
call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897as I will be on
vacation the rest of this week.

(See attached file: cms energy.doc)

(See attached file: cms energy.doc)

 - cms energy.doc


Bud and Chris:

The RTO West Filing Utilities asked for comments from interested stakeholders, to be returned to you today, regarding the following topics:

Paying Agent Agreement
Schedule Coordinator Agreement
Bylaws Revisions
Pricing and Losses -- Revised Draft Proposal
Planning -- Revised Draft Proposal

Pricing and Planning.
On behalf of NRU, we have previously commented on the basic pricing and planning components proposed by the FUs.  A copy of our comments is attached here.  What with the quite recent distribution of the revised pricing and planning drafts, and given the clarification session last Friday re: same, we are still working to understand the revised pricing and planning drafts.  To that end, we are meeting today with certain FU representatives in order to flesh out our understanding.  As such, for purposes of the comment you seek today, NRU repeats its previous basic comments as contained in the attachment.  We will provide you with any further comment once we have a handle on the newly revised pricing and planning proposals.

That said, we have a specific request of the Filing Utilities and consultants.  We may best understand the pricing proposal when we know which charges are imposed on a transmission customer, in a variety of scenarios.  Prior to the Feb. 11-12 negotiation sessions, please provide us with materials specifying the applicable transmission charges under the revised draft pricing and congestion management proposals, for the following transmission customer scenarios.  Assume in each case that  the transmission customer: (a) is located within the RTO West geographic footprint; (b) is subject to BPA's "company rate"; and either (c)(1) is not exposed to congestion, or (c)(2) is exposed to congestion:

1.  Unconverted NT, nominal forecasted load growth, one power supply source (e.g., a BPA "full requirement" customer):
   a.   with no GTA service.
   b.  with GTA service.
2.  Unconverted NT, unexpected load growth (e.g., greater than current cataloged rights), one power supply source (e.g., a BPA "full requirement" customer):
   a.  with no GTA service.
   b.  with GTA service.
3.  Unconverted NT, nominal forecasted load growth, multiple power supply sources (e.g., a BPA "partial requirement" customer):
   a.  with no GTA service.
   b.  with GTA service.
4.  Unconverted NT, unexpected load growth (e.g., greater than current cataloged rights), multiple power supply sources (e.g., a BPA "partial requirement" customer):
   a.  with no GTA service.
   b.  with GTA service.
5.  Unconverted NT that changes power suppliers.
6-10.  Same as 1-5 above, but assume in each case that the NT contract was converted to RTO West service.
11.  Unconverted PTP, used for service to load only:
   a.  with no GTA service
   b.  with GTA service
12.  Unconverted PTP, used for service to load and through wheeling:
   a.  with no GTA service
   b.  with GTA service
13.  Unconverted PTP, used for through wheeling
14-16. Same as 11-13 above, but assume in each case that the PTP contract was converted to RTO West service.

Bylaws.
Regarding the proposed changes to the Bylaws Article VI, NRU recommends that the original text concerning the number of candidates to the Board of Trustees be retained.  That is, an "executive search firm" would assemble "a slate of qualified candidates numbering twice the number of vacancies to be filled . . . [except for the first full Board, when the search firm would] assemble a slate of 15 qualified candidates."  Article VI.3.2.  Reducing the number of candidates to the same number of vacancies on the Board, as proposed, puts authority in the hands of the "executive search firm" seeking candidates, rather than with the Trustees Selection Committee.  That search firm may, or may not, be responsive to the Trustees Selection Committee.  The Trustees Selection Committee was intended to be, and should remain, the ultimate authority in selecting Trustees.  The proposed Bylaws change inappropriately places that authority in the hands of a third party search firm.

In addition, NRU renews its objections to the Bylaws as previously made in FERC Docket No. RT01-35.  Our comments herein do not in any way express or imply acquiescence to the Bylaws as filed in RTO West's prior submittals to FERC.

PA and SC Agreements.
Finally, as to the Paying Agent and Scheduling Coordinator Agreements, each of them need to be part of the March 1 filing with FERC.  NRU is coordinating our comments with other interested stakeholders, and with BPA, regarding these agreements.

RRG Negotiations.
We expect the RRG's Feb. 11-12 sessions to consist of negotiations between and among stakeholders, including the FUs. To that end, persons with authority to negotiate materials to be contained in the March 1 filing should be present for the full negotiation session.  Two days should be adequate to resolve any differences among us, but if not then NRU strongly urges that the negotiations continue so that something like consensus be reached.  We are much better served by an honest attempt at closure, than we are by meeting self-imposed deadlines that may impede actual resolution.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Shelly Richardson, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 61845
Vancouver, Washington  98666-1845
U.S.A.
voice (360) 737-2464
fax (360) 737-2661
shellyr@pacifier.com <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfax.com to today's gas & power prices & news.
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking http://www.enerfax.com


Sheila, FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cady, Rachel
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Studebaker, James ; Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike
Cc:	Holmes, Bradley; Laferla, Lynda ; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Cramer, Lanny; Cooper, Tim; Howard, Jack; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia
Subject:	RE: Purchase Gas at Bridgeline Napoleonville Storage

There's got to be a way to pick it up since PNR parks (receipts) are picked up on the Market Summary.  Perhaps make purchases and sales pathed noms into a a purchase/sale point? Thanks for following up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Studebaker, James
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 9:24 AM
To:	Cady, Rachel; Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike
Cc:	Holmes, Bradley; Laferla, Lynda ; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Cramer, Lanny; Cooper, Tim; Howard, Jack; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia
Subject:	RE: Purchase Gas at Bridgeline Napoleonville Storage

Rachel, the Market Summary report only picks up delivery quantities; therefore, it will pick up a sale of gas at a point in the supply area as this is a delivery out of linepack.  But, this report will not pick up a purchase in the supply area as a purchase registers as a receipt into the system.  This is why the purchase at Bridgeline Napoleonville (a receipt quantity) does not show up on the report.  We will need to see what we can do about that and get back with everyone.  I will talk with Larry Hill or Donna McGregor and let you know what we can do.  Thx, Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cady, Rachel
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:38 AM
To:	Studebaker, James ; Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike
Cc:	Holmes, Bradley
Subject:	RE: Purchase Gas at Bridgeline Napoleonville Storage

Jim, please make sure that you work on correcting the Market Summary and other reports that may be needed for accounting and Gas Control such as a system balance report.  This purchase is still not showing up at least on the Market Summary.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Studebaker, James
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:16 AM
To:	Cady, Rachel; Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike
Cc:	Holmes, Bradley
Subject:	Purchase Gas at Bridgeline Napoleonville Storage

Rachel and others:

Attached is a screen shot from TMS showing the scheduled purchase from Bridgeline Napoleonville Storage.  It has been scheduled for everyday in September so far.  Also attached below is a screen shot from the Scheduled Quantity by Cycle screen of the same purchase quantity for 9/14th.  Please call us if you have any questions.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>


Kay:

My only comment is in Section 5(e). The specific reference to Article 19.2 of
the Facility Agreement should be deleted, and the paragraph should read
"...as may be required pursuant to the Facility Agreement, ...".

I'd like to be able to send this out on Tuesday. Please let me, Fred and
Chris know when you have reviewed this draft.

Thanks,

Ben

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/11/2001 06:29:24 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'ben.f.jacoby@enron.com'" <ben.f.jacoby@enron.com>,
"'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>
Subject: Revised 7EA Turbine Letter Agreement

 <<2RZ504!.DOC>>  <<2RZ5RED.DOC>>

Kay:

We have enclosed clean and marked copies of a revised draft of the 7EA
turbine letter agreement reflecting revisions from the draft previously
distributed on January 8, 2001.  Please review and advise of any comments.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures: 129569v4
  129569vR4/3

 - 2RZ504!.DOC
 - 2RZ5RED.DOC


Daren:
There is a spot deal and an exchange deal for 9/6.  The spot deal is 391119
and the exchange deal is 231758.  They both have the same volume scheduled,
10,545 MMBtu.  Which deal do we use?  Duke shows the volume on the exchange
deal.  There is also spot deal 387571 for day 6, but I think it's OK.  The
deal was for 30,000 MMBtu and we have an actual of 29,420 MMBtu

Megan


Attached is a draft Complaint to the Alberta Market Surveillance
Administrator respecting the Balancing Pool's offer strategy for Clover Bar.

Please provide any comments as soon as possible.

Peter


GWF ???

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: DWR Power Assets

Counterparties with whom DWR has option of fuel are GWF, Calpine, Dynegy, Coral, Sunrise, Sempra, Wellhead and Pacificorp

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	DWR Power Assets

Jeff, thanks again for attending the discussions with DWR.

Do you have any recon.... on exactly which plants DWR has the right to bring the fuel on. As Mark indicated, it was about 1/3 of their exposure, and most of that was in the south service area, but I am very interested in the actual facilities and whom used to bring fuel to them or run the units.'

There is a zero sum game on fuel... but the landscape changes depending on who buys it and how they buy it!

Any thoughts.

BT


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

The "Governmental Aprroval" sections work as we discussed: Under Article
10.2, initial effectiveness is contingent on receipt of an ICC Order
acceptable to each party (note-this is an ICC order "required" for the
agreement to take effect). The Agreement can terminate under 15.1(e) if a
"Judgment" (court order, regulatory order etc.) determines that, as a
result of Hub Transactions, Peoples is subject to comprehensive regulation
as a natural gas co. or loses its Hinshaw status. Under 15.2, the Agreement
terminates if it is found void or illegal, or at the option of either party
if found void or illegal in part with frustration  of purpose. The intent
of our wording in these sections, and the related definitions, is to
eliminate the termination right (which was included in Peoples'intial
draft) for a regulatory action, such as an ICC order which adopts an
unfavorable ratemaking treatment for Hub revenues, but does not find the
agreement to be illegal or void. The thought was that, after Peoples
obtains an accpetable intial blessing from the ICC, the risk of some later
regulatory action short of a finding of illegality should rest with Peoples
during the Agreement's term.


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020104-DENWC.XLS


because i want to go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yes i am

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no you are not.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

im going to call ny and tell them you should really go up there now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok you are boring!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i'm funny.  don't you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

jerk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ya think?


Scott,

I appreciate your input. Thanks.

Vince

Scott Stoness@EES
11/19/2000 08:48 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re KRISHNARAO, PINNAMANENI V Review

I made a mistake and put comments for another person into Krishnar's PRC.
Please make sure that you ignore it if I can't get it fixed.  Below is what I
intended to put in.  My apologies.

I will get my assistant to get it deleted and put this information in on
monday.  It won't let me do it now.  I guess it does not pay to leave 30 or
40 reviews to the last day.  Paula: Please fix this for me and let Vince know
either that it is fixed or cannot be fixed.

Innovation/Entrapraneurship
No Basis

Communicating Goal Setting
No Basis

Team Work / Communication
Excellent.  Very easy to work with and get along with.

Business Instincts
Excellent.  Krishnar is consistent in asking to help out and asking what more
he could do to help us out.

Analystical Technical
Excellent.  Krishnar has a very strong grasp of what we are doing and how it
should be done.

Overall
Excellent.  My interactions with Krishnar have been limited but positive.
Krishnar is always positive with a positive attitude to get the job done.

Strengths:
Very strong analytical skills with a desire to add value.

Areas for Improvements
I don't understand Krisnar's role (is leading all research people on our
floor or just some) well and have had limited interaction with him.  {all has
been positive when it has ocurred} This suggests that Krishnar might spend
more time define what his people are doing and getting feedback about their
performance, and developing the project scope better.


You would need to go to clickathome.enron.com, sign in, then go to internet options.  Click on the order button next to Time Warner and then select yes for the question asking if you are a current TW subscriber.  Let us know if you need additoinal assistance.

From:	Michelle Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 04:10 PM
To:	Clickathome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	jimboman@bigfoot.com@SMTP@enronXgate

Subject:	Time Warner Cable question

I already have Road Runner cable internet service at home.  How can I be under the "discounted Enron plan?"  Do I need to cancel and start over or can my bills automatically be reflected?  Thanks.


Check out how I entered deal 289172, the final prices are $4.415, $4.435,
$4.455, and $4.475.

Comment?


Congratulations on the new position!  Look forward to seeing you now
that you're back in the neighborhood.  Good luck!

Rick Hornby
617 354 5304 x 115
Tabors Caramanis & Associates
www.tca-us.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:24 PM
To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com;
raa@vnf.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com;
Jeff.Alexander@enron.com; Al.Alexanderson@enron.com;
Keonee.Almaida@enron.com; hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us;
Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com; Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com;
gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com; paulb@citizenspower.com;
paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@Skadden.com;
raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com;
sbuchheit@bracepatt.com; alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com;
vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov; johncameron@dwt.com;
Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com; ajchambe@llgm.com;
Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com;
Victor.Contract@enron.com; powerlac@aol.com;
Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com; michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca;
kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com; wcurry@enron.com;
gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com; mday@gmssr.com;
dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com; Tom_Delaney@enron.com;
sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com; Mary.Doyle@enron.com;
Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com;
steve.c.hall@enron.com; Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@NWPPC.org;
jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us; rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com;
Steve_Hawke@pgn.com; dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us;
Scott.Helyer@enron.com; mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com;
rhornby@tca-us.com; mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com;
Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com; cfi1@tca-us.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com; montrey@aol.com;
danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com;
karid@perkinscoie.com; pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com; Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com;
Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov; kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com;
rdking@bpa.gov; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
rsk@schwabe.com; gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com;
Holli.Krebs@enron.com; ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com;
wdlamb@bpa.gov; John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com;
srlarson@bpa.gov; Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us;
zora.lazic@bchydro.com; kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com;
Debi.LeVine@enron.com; lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com;
Robert.Loeffler@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov;
rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx; david_lucio@iep.illinova.com;
king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca; kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com;
Mark.Maehr@enron.com; Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com;
John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com; maurw@perkinscoie.com;
Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com;
Christi.Nicolay@enron.com; tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com;
Sarah.Novasel@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com; PObenchain@idahopower.com; Pegy.Olds@enron.com;
Carol.Opatrny@enron.com; tpaine@avistacorp.com; Dave.Parquet@enron.com;
bpascoe@mtpower.com; afpaschke@bpa.gov; ccperigo@bpa.gov;
wlpernas@stoel.com; lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; npickover@bracepatt.com;
Phillip.Platter@enron.com; Alfred.Pollard@enron.com;
Walt.Pollock@enron.com; gporter@sppc.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com;
jquint@puget.com; arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com;
Bobby.Reeves@enron.com; preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com;
shellyr@pacifier.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov;
atrodrigues@bpa.gov; rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com;
Rothfelder@rlo-law.com; Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com;
asettanni@bracepatt.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com;
msmith1@enron.com; Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org;
Sid@enron.com; msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com;
small@wrightlaw.com; small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us;
Mike.Smith@enron.com; Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com;
Harvey.Spigal@enron.com; mstauffer@mtpower.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net; JKStier@BPA.gov;
rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com;
Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com; tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com;
James.K.Tarpey@enron.com; Jake.Thomas@enron.com;
ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com; maryann@pnucc.org;
mtierney@sempra.com; robin_tompkins@pgn.com; Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com;
AW.Turner@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Lisa.Urick@enron.com;
rvermeers@avistacorp.com; Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com;
John.Walley@enron.com; kristiwallis@sprintmail.com; walshl@howrey.com;
swalton@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; kaward@bpa.gov;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Carol.Wardell@enron.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com;
sawatson@bpa.gov; judy.welch@NWPP.ORG; 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM;
Kwenzel@zzz.com; cwestadt@sppc.com; Brian.Whalen@enron.com;
Bill.Williams@enron.com; klwmtp@worldnet.att.net; lyn_williams@pgn.com;
Greg.Wolfe@enron.com; Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com;
Ed.Wood@enron.com; mwood@stoel.com; Steve.Wright@enron.com;
Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com; WSCC@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Christian.Yoder@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com;
Steve.Kean@enron.com; Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com;
D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com; Carla.Hoffman@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com;
Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Roger.Fragua@enron.com;
James.B.Fallon@enron.com; Michael.Etringer@enron.com;
Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com; Stacy.Dickson@enron.com;
Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com; Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com;
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Sean.Crandall@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
t.briggs@enron.com; Stacey.Bolton@enron.com; dbenevid@enron.com;
dbenevid@enron.com; Tim.Belden@enron.com; Robert.Badeer@enron.com;
Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com;
Portland.West.Desk@enron.com; assad@elektro.com.br;
Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Alberto.Levy@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Allison.Navin@enron.com; Amy.Fabian@enron.com;
Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com; Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com;
Bill.Moore@enron.com; cristinah@elektro.com.br;
Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com; Carmen.Perez@enron.com;
Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Chauncey.Hood@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com;
Damon.Harvey@enron.com; Dan.Staines@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Dave.Mangskau@enron.com;
Donald.Lassere@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Eidy.Catala@enron.com;
Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com; Frank.Rishe@enron.com;
Geriann.Warner@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com;
Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
Howard.Fromer@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
Janine.Migden@enron.com; Javier.Pantoja@enron.com;
Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com; Jean.Ryall@enron.com; Jeff.Brown@enron.com;
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Joao.Paixao@enron.com; Joe.Allen@enron.com; Joe.Connor@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Jose.Bestard@enron.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com;
Kerry.Stroup@enron.com; Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com;
Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com;
Laurie.Knight@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Linda.J.Noske@enron.com; Linda.Robertson@enron.com;
Lindsay.Meade@enron.com; Lisa.Yoho@enron.com; Lora.Sullivan@enron.com;
Luiz.Maurer@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Marchris.Robinson@enron.com;
Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com; Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; Melinda.Pharms@enron.com;
Michelle.Belzak@enron.com; Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com;
Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com; Patrick.Keene@enron.com; Ray.Alvarez@enron.com;
Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com; Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Robert.Hemstock@enron.com;
Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com; Robin.Kittel@enron.com;
Ron.McNamara@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Rubena.Buerger@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Scott.Bolton@enron.com; Sergio.Assad@enron.com; Stella.Chan@enron.com;
Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com; Steve.Montovano@enron.com;
Steve.Walton@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Sue.Nord@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com;
Terri.Miller@enron.com; Thane.Twiggs@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Tom.Delaney@enron.com; Tom.Hoatson@enron.com;
Tracy.Cooper@enron.com; Valeria.Lima@enron.com; Vinio.Floris@enron.com;
Xi.Xi@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Howard.Fromer@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Janine.Migden@enron.com;
Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Jane.Wilson@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; kmagruder@newpower.com; scovino@newpower.com;
Rebecca.Carter@enron.com; Shelley.Corman@enron.com;
Janet.Butler@enron.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com;
Brad.Richter@enron.com; Greg.Piper@enron.com; Kevin.McGowan@enron.com;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
new address will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


Dear SAMANTHA BOYD,

You have been added to the waiting list for the following.

Course Title : 'Effective Communication:  Teamwork & Collaboration'
Session Code : 111401

The course details are given below for your confirmation.

Type            : Instructor Led Course
Course Code     : T&C

Session Code    : 111401
Starting Date   : Nov 14, 2001 8:30 AM
Ending Date     : Nov 15, 2001 4:30 PM

Number of Units : 14
price           : $400.00

Location        : Enron Building

                  1400 Smith
                  Houston, TX   77002

Meetings        :
      Start Time:  Nov 14, 2001 8:30 AM
        End Time:  Nov 14, 2001 4:30 PM
     No instructors or rooms have been assigned to this meeting.

      Start Time:  Nov 15, 2001 8:30 AM
        End Time:  Nov 15, 2001 4:30 PM
     No instructors or rooms have been assigned to this meeting.

You will be notified if a seat opens.

Thank you,
Docent Learning Management System.


Rod,  to my knowledge the Commission has not specifically defined what is de
minimus.   The working definition of an Operating Unit or System is taken
from an Office of the Chief Accountant Interpretative Letter issued  May 26,
1961.  "The principal tests are amount of investment, character of the
property acquired, and continuity of operation.  The following have been
deemed to be operating units or systems: a large compressor station, a
processing plant, an important measuring station, a gathering system or
important segment thereof,  a transmission line or important segment.  If the
transaction involves such a small amount of property as to be de minimus, it
need not be considered as an operating unit."  If a customer is attached to
the facilities to be sold it is considered prima facie evidence that the
property is an operating unit or system.

In a July 8, 1992, the NNG Rate department in an interoffice memorandum
regarding the Definition of an Operating Units or System noted "The
Commission has not specifically defined de minimus, however, based on past
rulings we can assume that the investment must be something less than $9
million, or a pipeline less than 7.586 miles."

The 1.091 miles of 6" pipe and Faribault TBS #1 and the Northfield 4"
branchlines of 4.9 miles and TBS have a net book value of $57,712.

My main concern, if we use the de minimus rationale, are we not setting a
precedent in which future sales or acquisitions will have to be viewed?  Some
of those future de minimus sales could involve gains!

Again, it is not clear how the Commission will make its determination.  The
downside, if the Commission rejects our argument, NNG will have a $ 58K loss
on the sale of these assets.

Rod Hayslett

11/27/2000 12:23 PM
To: Gary Zahn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Asset Divestiture Approval

I want to make sure of this.

	From:  Gary Zahn                           11/27/2000 10:56 AM

To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Asset Divestiture Approval

I think an argument can be made that the amount is de minimus which leads to
a non-operating unit designation.

	From:  Bob Chandler                           11/21/2000 05:17 PM

To: Gary Zahn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron

Subject: Asset Divestiture Approval

Gary:  Are you OK with the non-operating unit assumption based on deminimus
NBV?
If you're OK with it and the lawyers are OK, then it must be OK for me.

Rod:  I don't have a clue why Steve Harris should have to sign off on this
project.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000
05:08 PM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

11/21/2000 05:06 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Asset Divestiture Approval

Can anyone think of a reason why this should not be done or why the
assumptions made here are not all 100% correct?   Is there any risk on the
accounting?   Where is the contract for sale?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/21/2000
05:04 PM ---------------------------

Dave Waymire
11/20/2000 12:35 PM
To: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Asset Divestiture Approval

Attached is a  "Asset Divestiture Approval Form" for the sale of the
Faribault Minnesota branchline location # 83801 consisting of 1.091 miles of
6" pipe and the Faribault TBS#1 and the Northfield branchlines location No.'s
85001 and 85002 consisting of approximately 4.9 miles of 4" pipe, and the
Northfield TBS#1.

Please indicate your approval or rejection of this proposal on the approval
form and return to either James Centilli (EB4250) or David Waymire (OMA0755)
by 5PM Monday, November 27th.  If you have questions or concerns, please
contact James Centilli (853-5028) or myself (398-7062).

These branchlines are experiencing heavy encroachment.  The Faribault
branchline is currently being odorized by NSP per a previous arrangement in
order to comply with a commitment NNG made to the DOT to transport odorized
gas because of the population density along the pipeline.

There is no threat of a by pass by selling these branchlines.  There is an
estimated annual O&M savings of $10k to $20k plus the avoided expense,
exposure and operational headaches of not having to monitor high pressure
branchline odorization.

The net book value of these facilities is $57,712.  The facilities will be
sold for $1.  In addition, NSP has agreed to enter into a 1 year
transportation agreement guaranteeing incremental revenues of $350,000.

The net book value of the facilities, is assumed to be of such small value as
to be de minimus as allowed by previous rulings of the Commission and  will
be treated as a non-operating unit.  This will allow the undepreciated
balance to be cleared to depreciation reserves.

The sale will require that the Northfield TBS be relocated upstream of the
main line take off at an estimated cost of $225,000.

David


ROBERTS JR,MICHAEL A  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on ROBERTS JR,MICHAEL A  until you
have approved the list.


[IMAGE]

Register now -- before it sells out!
Your customers are already signed up.
Click here to register and/or see the attendee list!

The Atlanta LDC Forum promises to be the largest gathering of energy buyers
in the Southeast. Network with your customers and hear from industry experts
about the growing gas and power crunch in the Southeast Region. The last 4
LDC Forums were sold out, so don't be too late!

Special Focus at this year's Atlanta Forum:

Risk management
Supply constraints and availability
New projects
Will California problems spread to the Southeast?

Click here to go directly to the Atlanta LDC Forum Registration Form
For an agenda, a pre-listing of attendees or more information, visit our
website at
www.interchange-energy.com (then click on the Atlanta Forum)
or call Jerry Ribnick at 763-545-1515 or 800-427-3976

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
		? ?The LDC Forum Series
?Atlanta
June 4-5. 2001	?Chicago ?
	Sept. 10-12, 2001?	?Boston
		April 18-19, 2002
Interchange Energy Group, 620 Mendelssohn Avenue North, Suite 161,
Minneapolis, MN 55427
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
If you prefer to not receive future e-mails regarding The LDC Forums, please
REPLY to this message and indicate REMOVE in the subject field.
 - 9915star.gif


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
11:18 AM ---------------------------

Energy Info Source <custsvc@energyinfosource.com> on 11/17/2000 11:57:25 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: Distributed Generation Update

Energy Info Source is privileged to make available to you a free sample
issue of its Bi-weekly Distributed Generation Update Report.  This report
contains the latest news on fuels cells, microturbines, wind, and solar
provided in PDF format delivered to you via email every other week all
for only $75/year for an individual subscription (corporate subscriptions
for multiple users are available for $200/year).

Check it out and if you'd like to subscribe, click on the following link
to order online or call us at 888-986-2250 (303-986-7449 if in Canada)
to order by phone.  We accept Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.

http://www.energyinfosource.com/rapid/report_generation.cfm#subscribe

Viewing the report requires Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher, available
free at:

http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

----------------------
If you want to be taken off our mailing list or for more information:

Energy Info Source, Inc.
email: custsvc@energyinfosource.com
phone: 888-986-2250

 - DistGen09_24.pdf


Just one note.  I have a typo in your company name in the address, it needs
an "r".  Fax it back to me at 713/646-3490 and I will get it signed by
Enron.  Thanks for such a quick response!

	"John Dean" <john.dean@excambria.com>
	12/14/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Excambria Non-Disclosure Agreement

Thank you Tana. Shall I fax the executed copy back to your attention? Can
you please provide me with your fax number?

Regards,
John

John Dean
VP, Business Development
Excambria, Inc
One Waters Park Drive
Suite 200
San Mateo, CA  94403
Telephone: 650-377-4347
EMail: john.dean@excambria.com
www.excambria.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 3:14 PM
To: john.dean@excambria.com
Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; Rahil.Jafry@enron.com
Subject: Excambria Non-Disclosure Agreement

At the request of Louise Kitchen, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  Please call me at (713) 853-3399 if you have any
comments or questions.

(See attached file: excambria.doc)


Assuming the two of you are still alive?
Darnell