Kath, I know I'm not an Enron employee but if no one at Enron wants a spot, wanted to let you know I would be most interested in a spot.  Thank You!

lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sheppard, Kathryn
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:25 AM
To:	Blackburn, Jody; Cavanaugh, Darren; Elafandi, Mo; Emmert, Caroline; Eriksson, Fredrik; Erwin, Kenton; Gang, Lisa; Gilbert, Jim; Hammond, Don; Kane, Paul; Mays, Wayne; O'Neil, Murray P.; Sarnowski, Julie; Sheppard, Kathryn; Slaughter, Jeff G.; Thome, Jennifer; Thompson, Virginia; Tully, Mike; Williams, Bill
Subject:	WTC Parking

Portland Employees-

At this time Enron Portland has 5 parking spots allocated based on floor space and number of employees.  As UBS employees leave we do not automatically have the ability to take over their spots.  However, in renegotiating our lease with PGE we will address the possibility of taking over more that the 5 allocated spots.  We will keep you updated as to the progress of this.  For now, Khymberly Booth is checking into the availability of 1 or more of our spots and will offer any available spots to Portland employees based on Portland office seniority.  We will contact you individually if a spot becomes available.  If you have any questions please contact Kathy Sheppard or Khymberly Booth.

Thanks-
Khymberly Booth


Sure.  Chris Hill (212) 946-8887

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Garcia, Paul
Subject: Chase custody account

Paul:

Laurel Adams told me that you would provide me with a name and phone number
of someone at Chase for purposes of negotiating the global custody account.
Do you have any information?  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Steve,

I am sending you a variety of charts with prices and operational detail.  If
you need to call with questions my home number is 713-463-8626.

As far as recommendations, here is a short list:

 1.  Examine LDC's incentive rate program.  Current methodology rewards sales
above monthly index without enough consideration of future
      replacement cost.  The result is that the LDC's sell gas that should be
injected into storage when daily prices run above the monthly index.
                    This creates a shortage in later months.

 2.  California has the storage capacity and pipeline capacity to meet
demand.  Investigate why it wasn't maximized operationally.
                      Specific questions should include:

  1.  Why in March '00-May '00  weren't total system receipts higher in order
to fill storage?

  2.  Why are there so many examples of OFO's on weekends that push away too
much gas from Socal's system.
       I believe Socal gas does an extremely poor job of forecasting their
own demand.  They repeatedly estimated they would receive       more gas than
their injection capablity, but injected far less.

 3.  Similar to the power market,  there is too much benchmarking to short
term prices.  Not enough forward hedging is done by the major
                    LDCs.  By design the customers are short at a floating
rate.  This market has been long historically.  It has been a buyers market
and the
     consumer has benefitted.

Call me if you need any more input.

Phillip


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/18/2001 12:11 PM -----

	"Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
	05/18/2001 11:48 AM

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
(E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail)" <anchau@shellus.com>,
"Bill Chen (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>, "Douglas Oglesby (E-mail)"
<doao@chevron.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail)" <jeff.hanson@phaser.com>,
"jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail)" <jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>, "Joseph
Alamo (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Kathleen Magruder (E-mail)"
<kmagruder@newpower.com>, "Marcie Milner (E-mail)" <Marcie.Milner@enron.com>,
Michael Nelson <mnelson@electric.com>, "Mona Petrochko (E-mail)"
<mpetroch@enron.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>, "Rebecca
Schlanert (E-mail)" <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail)"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Robert Morgan (E-mail)"
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor  Davis' Lead Bond Counsel Holds Teleconference Today wi th
Financial Analysts: Summary

> Governor  Davis' Lead Bond Counsel Holds Teleconference Today with
> Financial Analysts: Summary
>
> The host of the teleconference was Mr. Joseph Fichera, CEO of Saber
> Partners (serving as Governor's independent Bond Counsel)
>
> Mr. Fichera's goal appeared to be to calm the financial markets as the
> Governor is hoping under a best case scenario to put the bonds out to
> market sometime in June.  Fichera told me yesterday that he does these
> calls on an "as needed" basis.  There appeared to be some concern that the
> "media is getting ahead of the story" and the inference could be made that
> this is causing problems for the Governor's MOU legislation (which they
> also said they hope to have signed by June) and perhaps for the emerging
> "Plan B" as well.
>
> A replay of this teleconference is available at www.energyinfo.ca.gov.ca
>
> Mr. Fichera broke down his statement into the following sections:
>
> California State Senate: Pieces of Governor's MOU legislation moving in
> separate committees; in the Senate this is positive for moving it forward.
>
> Assembly Plan B Group: Assemblymembers Keeley, Dutra and Nation are
> working together and have good ideas to move the Governor's MOU
> legislation through.  Fichera said that the Governor's office is meeting
> with both parties but the plan is still in the  formative stages.  He
> added that they still have the Senate to deal with and no movement on the
> proposal is imminent.  They are hopeful that it will be "moving toward
> resolution in a week or two."
>
> Generators: Fichera stated that since the Governor's meeting with the
> generators, a subgroup has agreed to continue to meet with Governor's
> staff and advisors to resolve the issues.  He stated that the issue of
> litigation and investigations by the AG's office is "off the table" for
> discussion and that topics of discussion are limited to supply issues and
> managing the coming summer.
>
> QFs: Governor's team has facilitated 5 days of discussions with SCE and
> QFs over past two weeks; most QFs are represented at these negotiations.
> They continue to discuss the back payments owed and lower prices going
> forward to give pricing stability to CDWR and the market.  Their hope is
> that due to negotiations, the QFS will all be fully available to the
> market this summer.
>
> PGE:  They see the bankruptcy judge's refusal to allow certain QFs to get
> out of their contracts as a positive development.
>
> QFs on-line: There are currently 700 MWs off-line; this is better than
> their model anticipated for May.  They expect more than 90%
> on-line by June.  Last month 1700 QF MWs off-line; Fichera explained that
> standard QF contracts have severe penalties if not on by June 1 during
> peaks but that they are allowed to be off during off-peak hours.  He added
> that they are still trying to resolve their issues.
>
> Key aspects of budget plan (by this I believe he meant energy financing,
> not the annual budget):  conservation and contracts
>
> Conservation: They built in a 4% reduction in demand and 3% reduction for
> price elasticity--conservatively projecting  7% in conservation.  He
> stated the we saw 9% conservation in March and April, "so we think our
> model is conservative."  Fichera added that the new electricity rates go
> out in June and they expect that this will cause a "good reaction" due to
> price signals and demand reduction.
>
> They also built in 2% in natural load growth to their projections as well
> to further ensure a conservative estimate.
>
> Energy Costs: Projected ($1.78 billion) vs. actual ($1.80 billion) equals
> a variance of 1.4%
>
> May Energy Costs:  As of May 6th, right on budget target, with a variance
> of less than a half percent
>
> Contracts:  Fichera stated that DWR continues to execute new contracts and
> reduce the net short exposure in the spot market.  He added that 10-20% of
> necessary contracts are not yet executed, but rather in the agreement in
> principal stage.  He released the following stats:
>
> Needed executed contracts completed (these percentages must refer to
> projected load accounted for): 43% for May, 67% for June, 48% for July,
> 42% for August
>
> When agreements in principle added in: 73% for June, 67% for July, 60% for
> August:
>
> Questions from analysts:
>
> Have you built-in an assumption that QFs will be able to opt out of
> contracts?  "No, we do not because we are fighting the opt-out positions.
> The bankruptcy judge refused to allow this and the AG is probably going to
> be involved to stop that.  A few hundred MWs have gone into the market.
> We are aware of this issue, which is why we're pushing the MOUs--this
> litigation would stop if we get an agreement on the MOU because the back
> payment issue would be settled."
>
> Timing with SDG&E,  where are you on MOU or Agreement in Principle?  We
> have to constantly reevaluate our negotiations   due to other decisions
> {happening simultaneously around us].  We are resuming face to face
> negotiations on Monday and we are still resolved to reach an agreement.
> There is no drop dead date.
>
> Generators working group? We're discussing DWR credit issues, summer,
> support for MOU--the generators have issues with outstanding payments due.
> The Governor expects them to provide haircut re: those payments and that's
> part of discussion.
>
> QF resolution: will gas QFs be released from contracts?  We don't know
> what PG&E is going to do but they could do that-- release at any time--no
> indications yet--haven't affirmed all the contracts yet.  We want to avoid
> this in the SCE situation.  There are a lot of overlapping QFs that supply
> both utilities.  We are trying to set a standard as to what we are looking
> for.
>
> Bond issue timing? The current plan, assuming there is no further action
> by the legislature, is to close sales 91 days after bond sales, on Aug.
> 14.  We have sufficient cash to carry us through this period.  We are
> making a bridge loan from the General Fund.  In June we see improved
> revenue stream from ISO; rate increases will also improve cash stream.
>
> Can you give us any prices on new contracts?  Not on new contracts, we are
> resisting for market reasons giving out individual prices for individual
> contracts.  Our website has aggregated average prices for contracts signed
> so far.
>
> Where is the legislature?  Legislators want to see sharing of the pain--so
> far the focus has been mostly on generators.  The undercollection is
> associated so far with the generators, legislators are beginning to see
> that only about 1/3 of the undercollection is tied to generators.  So
> should QFs and commercial banks share the pain?  Some think some are less
> guilty than others.  We can only deal with Edison.  The media has gotten a
> little ahead of the process, this is going to take longer than a few
> weeks.
>
> Handicap?  Lead horse?  The Assembly is more organized and focused right
> now on enhancements and changes to the Governor's  plan; the Senate is not
> as organized, though we have engaged with Senator Burton--we met with him
> 3 times this week.  And the Senate Majority leader has sponsored a bill to
> implement the Governor's plan.
>
> If QFs freed up from contracts under bankruptcy or otherwise released from
> contracts--how does this affect your financial plans?  "I think it would
> change it dramatically.  It would be a budget busting event."  That's why
> we're resisting in court and pushing the MOU and hope that the legislature
> sees why bankruptcy is not a viable solution.
>
> Does this need to be solved before bond issue?  The combination of AB1x
> and 31x gives us ironclad bonding authority and the legal ability to
> recover all costs.  We think that only a few QFs can survive without
> long-term contracts, so it's also possible that not all would go into spot
> market, few may be able to survive as merchant generators.
>
> Windfall profits tax--helpfulness of generators--did they perform
> adequately during summer of 2000?  What are your expectations of their
> performance?  The Governor did not have a quantitative answer in mind--he
> left that open as to how he'll evaluate their performance. People at DWR
> and ISO will probably have the strongest influence on the Governor in this
> matter.
>
> Bond issue timing?  We are working with the treasurer and hope to sell
> bonds by end of June "if stars are aligned"--it may be one mega-deal or
> several tronches (sp?)--this is still open for discussion.  Even with the
> rising prices that we expect this summer, most of our net short will be
> under contract or reduced due to demand side management and thus we don't
> expect our budget to be busted.
>
> Extended bridge financing commitment?--irrelevant because we don't have
> authority to issue for 90 days.
>
> Renewable QFs/gas prices--is there anything can you do--levelize gas
> prices so they can operate under "S-rack" (sp?) price formula?
>
> Many options have been discussed, to bring them into the market we need
> such issues to become part of the global settlement and to continue to be
> worked out.
>
> Polanco MOU legislation: is it identical to the Governor's view or already
> changed?  This is the implementing legislation for the Governor's MOU--not
> changed so far.  Governor did not put MOU on table as legislation that
> could be changed. (He went on to explain that anything taken out must be
> replaced in some other fashion to keep the MOU balanced...) This is going
> to take some time; however, we do have a sense of urgency--we are hoping
> for a vote sometime in June.  The MOU has deadline of August 15.
>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Senior Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>


- KFC.jpg


Audrey,

Do you have a specific format that you would like me to use?

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	FW: Time Reports are Due Tomorrow

Please submit.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041221.txt


Russell:
I will draft something up later today for you  to look at.  With respect to
Richardson Products, the July 29, 1999 Guaranty in the second paragraph
already picks up all ECT affiliates which would include HPL, such that any
physical contract between ECT or its affiliates and Richardson Products II,
Ltd. would already be covered.  Their letter mentions an April 28th
Guaranty.  Does one exist?

Why I don't think that we need to say anything with respect to the July 29th
Guaranty, it certainly wouldn't hurt for them to simply send us a letter
referencing this Guaranty and stating that it is their understanding that the
term "ECT Affiliates" as used in the Guaranty  includes Houston Pipe Line
Company.

Carol


Dick:

After our conversation, I spoke with our settlements people again who
requested an EWEB invoice when Enron owes money to EWEB.  I propose that we
add a section to the Schedule entitled "Accounts" (Part 3(h)) as follows:

"Prior to each payment date for any Transaction, Party A (ENA) shall provide
Party B with an invoice reflecting the net payment owed by a party.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Party B shall provide Party A with an invoice
prior to any payment date on which Party A owes a net payment to Party B.
With respect to all payments hereunder, and except as otherwise directed in
writing, the parties shall comply with the following payment instructions:

[bank, account no., ABA no.]"

Please provide me with EWEB's account data and let me know if you have any
comments.  I'll send the blackline immediately after I hear from you.

Also, I have not received EXECUTED CONFIRMATIONS.  Have these been sent to
anyone at Enron?  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Dear all,

Following up with Vince's meeting on full requirement, we might just start
with the existing Psim model.
The attached spreadsheet  is still running !

You need to create a directory H:\projects\pwrsim before your run the model.
If you want to re-run the model,
you need to close the report because re-run causes the program re-write the
report.

Let us first review what is already there in the PSIM model, if we can live
with the simplistic dispatch
logic in PSIM, the PSIM is the deliverable product for the full requirement
deal.

Alex agrees to write an agenda for this project before the Friday meeting.

Zimin


Vince,

Greetings.

I write at this time to follow up on your kind intercession on our behalf
with Jeff Skilling's office regarding his participation in our Spring
Conference.  We have secured hotel rooms at the Radisson Hotel, will
shortly have to provide a guarantee on those rooms, and would therefore
like to ascertain his participation as keynote speaker the evening of Thur.
2/22.

Hope all is well.  See you Oct. 11th, if not sooner.  Best,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 09:46
AM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt@ENRON on 03/08/2001 08:11 AM
To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: John Arnold/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Enron Mentions

Family Holding
Forbes, 03/19/01

The New Forecast For Meteorologists: It's Raining Job Offers --- Energy
Trading Firms Snap Up Grads of an Inexact Science; No Blow-Dryer? No Problem
The Wall Street Journal, 03/08/01

ENRON PROVIDES TRADING SERVICES TO MANX ELECTRICITY UNDER NETA
CRL, 03/08/01

Energy Trading Companies Pay Big for Weather Talent, WSJ Says
Bloomberg, 03/08/01

ENRON FAILS TO ATTRACT BIDS FOR 30 PCT STAKE IN INDIAN OIL FIELD
Asia Pulse, 03/07/01

SINGAPORE: PetroChina plans five gas, products lines by 2005.
Reuters English News Service, 03/07/01

Companies People Ideas
Family Holding
BY Phyllis Berman

03/19/2001
Forbes
102
Copyright 2001 Forbes Inc.

Lemuel Green, a flour mill owner, took the excess power from the water-turned
generator at his mill in 1908 and sold it between dusk and midnight to
anybody in Alton, Kan. who knew what to do with it. Soon he quit the milling
business and started stringing transmission lines across the western part of
the state. Before his death in 1930 he had built a utility that lit 56 Kansas
communities.
Kansas City's UtiliCorp United is perhaps the only fourth-generation
family-controlled electric utility in the country. Today the outfit, once
called Missouri Public Service, is headed by Lemuel Green's two
great-grandsons.
Richard Green, 46, took over as chief executive in 1985, three years after
his father's death. At the time Missouri Public Service served 200,000
customers in two states and had $245 million in revenues. Richard's brother
Robert, now 39, joined him three years later.
Standing pat was not an option. Deregulation was in the air, and the rules
were changing. The brothers remade the company. They spent $4 billion buying
utilities in other parts of the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
UtiliCorp now serves 4 million customers in seven states and four countries.
More important, they veered off into other parts of the energy business. In
1986 they acquired gas properties from Peoples Natural Gas of Omaha and got a
two-person gas-trading operation as part of the deal. That little trading
operation, now a subsidiary called Aquila, turned into something almost as
valuable as all the rest of the company, with its 4,500 megawatts of power
generated in some 22 power plants around the country.
"My brother and I received strong advice that we would never be able to be
competitive in this business," says Bob Green. Oh, yeah? Aquila has 1,100
employees and competes with the likes of Duke, Dynegy and Enron. According to
Natural Gas Week, Aquila was the fourth-largest power-and-gas marketer in the
country last year. Aquila trades a host of other products as well-everything
from weather-condition hedges to bandwidth.
Problem: Trading operations require capital just as power plants do. The
solution, until now, has been what brother Bob calls "our 'asset lite'
strategy. We want to control the capacity, not own it." So Aquila may provide
the gas to power a so-called merchant plant, one that produces electricity to
sell in the market, in return for a claim on its production. But so far
Aquila has not been a big player in the most profitable parts of the
business-taking on big risk in larger transactions, the way Enron and Dynegy
do.
What to do? In mid-December UtiliCorp announced that it would offer 19.9% of
Aquila to the public, raising capital while creating a market value for its
trading operation, just as competitors Constellation Energy and Southern
Company are doing. The hope is that the new entity will garner a multiple of
20 to 45 times earnings. Then, if all were to go as planned, UtiliCorp would
spin off the rest of the operation in a tax-free distribution.
The timing looks good. Aquila has no material exposure in the California
market. Furthermore, the volatility in that market has been a bonanza for
many firms that trade power, including Aquila. Its trading subsidiary is the
reason UtiliCorp's earnings were up 28% last year, to $206 million, on $29
billion in sales. UtiliCorp's shares doubled in the past year to $30.
But will the California crisis nonetheless poison the market for an Aquila
stock offering? It might. And UtiliCorp cannot afford to hold its breath in
the capital markets forever. Even with its "asset-lite" strategy, the company
is far more leveraged than most utilities, with debt at 56% of capital,
versus the 50% norm for electric utilities. The offering is supposed to raise
$425 million or so that could be used to pay down a bit of the parent's $2.9
billion in debt.
If Bob Green is walking a financial tightrope, you could never tell it by
talking to him. "We see this company as our heritage," he says confidently.
This despite the fact that after seven equity offerings the family's share of
UtiliCorp is now 4%, down from 15% when Richard took over.
Might the Greens lose their heirloom in a takeover battle? They might, but
they might come out ahead anyway. Look at the family history. Lemuel sold
some of his utility assets for $6.6 million in 1927 and diversified into
California orange groves. The assets were resold to Samuel Insull, the
midwestern electricity magnate who came to a bad end when his pyramid of
holding companies collapsed during the Depression. Years later, after
Congress reacted with a law that busted up multistate electric utilities, Bob
and Rick's grandfather bought back Lemuel Green's utility properties for a
song.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The New Forecast For Meteorologists: It's Raining Job Offers --- Energy
Trading Firms Snap Up Grads of an Inexact Science; No Blow-Dryer? No Problem
By Chip Cummins
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

03/08/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A1
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

Two years ago, Bradley Hoggatt was heading for an academic career in
meteorology, intent on discovering more about how hurricanes form. But just
before he started working on a doctorate, a very different opportunity blew
in.
Now Mr. Hoggatt forecasts weather for a floor full of M.B.A.s who trade
billions of dollars in weather-sensitive energy commodities such as natural
gas and electricity for Aquila Inc., the trading subsidiary of a big Midwest
utility.
With no business background himself, Mr. Hoggatt is also trading complex
financial contracts based on his predictions. "I'm putting my money where my
mouth is," says the tall, square-shouldered 28-year-old.
Weathermen and women have become a hot commodity in the exploding
energy-trading business. While off-target forecasts on television may
frustrate parents and schools and embarrass politicians, as they did this
week on the East Coast, they can lose bundles for electricity and natural-gas
traders. So as trading has boomed, so has demand for trained meteorologists,
a profession that traditionally hasn't paid all that well and is often the
butt of jokes.
From Wall Street to Houston's Louisiana Street, where many energy companies
have set up shop, recent graduates are earning twice what they would earn at
the National Weather Service or in academia. "The appetite for weather is
insatiable," says James L. Gooding, director of meteorology at Duke Energy
Corp. A former NASA scientist, Dr. Gooding will be adding a fourth forecaster
to his Houston team in the next year.
Enron Corp., an energy-trading giant based in Houston, has more than doubled
its staff of weather forecasters to nine in the past three years, plucking
talent from places like the Weather Channel. Williams Cos., a Tulsa, Okla.,
competitor, is endowing university fellowships to lure meteorology students.
And since 1999, Aquila, which is owned by UtiliCorp United Inc., of Kansas
City, Mo., has hired two other meteorologists from Mr. Hoggatt's alma mater,
the University of Wisconsin, plus another scientist with a Ph.D. in
climatology.
That hiring paid off a bit during this week's winter storm in the Northeast.
While many on the East Coast were getting miscues from TV weathermen on a
pending, possibly historic blizzard that fizzled in New York and other
cities, traders at Aquila simply looked to Mr. Hoggatt.
Last Friday, Scott Macrorie, an electricity trader for the Mid-Atlantic
region at Aquila, stopped by to see how the storm was progressing. Mr.
Hoggatt's team told him temperatures in his region of interest would be lower
because of the storm, though the snowfall forecast on TV seemed a little
high. Sure enough, temperatures fell and snowfall in many cities was less
than predicted, lifting electricity prices and making Mr. Macrorie a profit
that he says was in the tens of thousands of dollars.
About 500 university students in the U.S. graduate each year with bachelor's
degrees in meteorology, according to the American Meteorological Society. An
additional 300 or so graduate with masters degrees or doctorates. Until just
a few years ago, those graduates didn't typically have many options: TV for
those who had the blow-dried look, back-office jobs with the government or a
handful of private consultants for those who didn't. Research was an option.
And some airlines and utilities kept a few meteorologists on staff to help
position airplanes or power-line repair trucks during storms.
Now, deep-pocketed trading companies are offering many meteorologists with
graduate degrees salaries ranging from $60,000 to $90,000. Performance and
trading bonuses can double or even triple the figure. That compares with the
roughly $33,000 the National Weather Service pays a junior forecaster with a
graduate degree.
"It's a bit unusual for meteorologists to have the prospect of lucrative
employment after graduation," says John Nielsen-Gammon, a professor of
atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University. "This is a bit of a switch."
So far, there has been no dearth of meteorological talent available, partly
because the National Weather Service wrapped up a big expansion project in
the mid-1990s and slowed hiring. It hires only to replace people who leave,
about 30 to 50 meteorologists a year.
And the high-pressure world of billion-dollar commodity bets isn't for
everyone. When Carl Altoe graduated from Penn State, one of the nation's top
meteorology programs, he got a heavy sales pitch from Enron. "It's quite an
impressive place," he says of Enron's trading floor, but he wasn't sure
forecasting skills alone would be enough to make the grade. "I would be
afraid that if money wasn't made in a hurry, I'd be tossed," says Mr. Altoe,
who accepted a position with the National Weather Service in Marquette, Mich.
For others, having forecasts count puts a new thrill in the old art. After
two years as a manager at the Weather Channel's Latin American division in
Atlanta, Jose Marquez posted his resume on an Internet job site run by the
American Meteorological Society. Enron called.
"Have you heard about Enron?" Mr. Marquez remembers being asked. "And I said,
honestly, `No.'"
During a visit, Mr. Marquez, a 33-year-old Navy-trained meteorologist, found
Enron's trading floor exhilarating. Enron courted Mr. Marquez heavily,
tracking him down three times during his Christmas vacation in Puerto Rico.
Mr. Marquez decided the sprawling trading floor was just the sort of active
work place he was looking for. Also, he'd be getting a 10% to 15% boost over
his Weather Channel salary, before potential bonuses from Enron.
"I'm getting more money than I would anywhere else," he says.
Weather has long affected prices of everything from grain at Chicago's early
commodity markets to the stocks of retail companies on Wall Street. Jon
Davis, a meteorologist for Salomon Smith Barney in Chicago, started
forecasting the weather for agriculture traders back in 1985.
But volatile energy prices have raised the stakes for forecasters who are
able to gauge air-conditioning use in the summer or natural-gas demand during
the winter heating season. Meanwhile, all sorts of companies are turning to
energy traders and Wall Street for "weather derivatives," complex contracts
used to hedge financial risks associated with the weather. "With every
passing year, you do more energy and more energy," Mr. Davis says.
Despite big advances in data collection and modeling, betting millions of
dollars on weather forecasts can still be tricky business. Short-term
forecasts are pretty good. Predicting weather two weeks from now is chancy.
Most meteorologists get their data from the government, particularly the
National Weather Service. Many then tweak it with their own interpretations
or forecasting models.
Disappointed last year by poor long-term forecasts from 11 private
consultants, Aquila has a contest offering $100,000 to the meteorologist or
team that can best predict temperatures in 13 major U.S. cities over the
course of a year. "I call it the forecast bakeoff," says Mr. Hoggatt.
The high stakes also mean more pressure on forecasters. WSI Corp., a
Billerica, Mass., weather-forecasting firm, started an energy service last
year, and Jeffrey A. Shorter, a WSI vice president, says energy clients can
be less forgiving than his other clients in TV and aviation, especially when
the forecasts are wrong. But, he adds, "presumably, more often than not,
we're right."

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

ENRON PROVIDES TRADING SERVICES TO MANX ELECTRICITY UNDER NETA
2001-03-08 08:43 (New York)

     (The following is a reformatted version of a press release issued
by Enron and received via electronic mail. The release was not confirmed
by the sender.)

ENRON AND MANX ELECTRICITY ANNOUNCE POWER TRADING AGREEMENT

     London, March 8 -- Enron announced today that it has concluded a
long-term power trading agreement with the Manx Electricity Authority
(MEA), representing one of the first deals with an embedded generator
specifically designed for the New Electricity Trading Arrangements
(NETA). Under the agreement Enron will provide 24-hour trading services
to MEA under NETA in an innovative deal structured to maximise the value
of the electricity interconnector between the Isle of Man and UK
mainland.
     The A45 million interconnector runs between Bispham in Lancashire
and Douglas on the Isle of Man and is capable of carrying 40MW in each
direction. At 105km it is the longest AC interconnector cable in the
world.
     "The development costs of the interconnector to the UK placed us
under pressure to put the link to the highest and best economic use and
we feel our relationship with Enron has accomplished this" said Mike
Proffitt, Chief Executive of MEA.
     "Our commitment to reducing the price of electricity on the Isle of
Man is firmly embedded in MEA's five year plan and our trading
partnership with Enron will greatly assist us in achieving this goal."
     Richard Lewis, Managing Director of UK gas and power at Enron,
commented: "This is a great transaction for both parties and fits well
into Enron's trading portfolio. MEA will benefit from Enron's expertise
as one of the UK's leading energy traders and will provide us with their
skills as operators of their generation plant and the interconnector. It
is significant in that we believe it is one of the first embedded
generation transactions specially tailored for the new trading
arrangements."

Media Contacts:

Alex Parsons
Enron
Tel: 020 7783 2394

Alison Cottier
Manx Electricity
Tel: 01624 687798

(db)LO
                                     -END-
-0- (CRL) Mar/08/2001 13:43 GMT

Energy Trading Companies Pay Big for Weather Talent, WSJ Says
2001-03-08 06:47 (New York)

     Kansas City, March 8 (Bloomberg) -- The growth of energy
trading floors in the past several years has made meteorology a
glamour profession, even for forecasters who never even intended
to predict the weather on television, the Wall Street Journal
reported.
     Weather affects commodities trading and determines
electricity and natural gas supply and demand. That's why large
energy trading companies like Enron Corp., Williams Cos. and
UtiliCorp United Inc. recruit top weather-forecasting talent, the
paper said. Meteorologists with graduate degrees can command
$60,000 to $90,000 a year, far higher than the $33,000 the
National Weather Service pays a junior staffer.
     Energy traders use in-house weather forecasts to make quick
bets on the direction of electricity and natural gas prices. Fast
and accurate predictions can earn huge profits, the paper said.
     Many meteorologists say they like the pace and action of the
trading floor. While some in the profession work in broadcasting,
most meteorologists labor in the less visible and action-oriented
worlds of academia or government research, the paper said.

(Wall Street Journal 3-8 A1)

ENRON FAILS TO ATTRACT BIDS FOR 30 PCT STAKE IN INDIAN OIL FIELD

03/08/2001
Asia Pulse
(c) Copyright 2001 Asia Pulse PTE Ltd.

NEW DELHI, March 8 Asia Pulse - US energy major Enron Corporation's bid to
sell its 30 per cent stake in Panna-Mukta and Tapti oil and gas field has met
with lukewarm response primarily due to inherent problems with the project.
Several glitches in the joint venture agreement and disputes with other
partners in the joint venture, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) and
Reliance, have kept away international oil giants like Royal Dutch Shell,
British Petroleum and BHP of Australia, industry sources said.
While Enron is believed to have pegged the sale price of its stake in the
Indian venture at US$700 million, independent evaluations by various domestic
and international companies have discounted the figure between US$250 to
US$380 million factoring several pending agreements and unresolved issues,
sources said.
ONGC, which holds 40 per cent stake in the US$900 million venture, Reliance,
having 30 per cent interest in the gas fields, and Indian Oil Corporation
(IOC) are among the 4-5 companies that are left in the fray for acquiring
Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd (EOGIL's) stake in Panna-Mukta and Tapti fields.
Inspite of over three years of operation, Panna oilfield's processing tariff
has not yet been fixed with ONGC and the promoters have not yet reached a
final agreement on gas transportation cost from Tapti, sources said.
Besides, delivery point for Panna has not been determined which has resulted
in a 10 per cent revenue loss which the government deducts from the total gas
revenue of the company.
(PTI) 08-03 1002

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

SINGAPORE: PetroChina plans five gas, products lines by 2005.
By Chen Aizhu

03/07/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

SINGAPORE, March 8 (Reuters) - PetroChina has mapped out plans for a massive
pipeline gridwork to be in place by 2005 and to ship huge hydrocarbon
reserves in China's west to its thriving east, government and industry
officials said on Thursday.
"A total of five pipelines are planned in the 10th five-year plan
(2001-2005), four gas and one for refined oil products," a senior industry
official told Reuters by telephone from Beijing.
Officials estimated total cost of the projects at 50 billion yuan ($6
billion) at least.
Topping the agenda and the largest of the five projects is the 4,200-km gas
trunk line winding eastwards from China's central Asian region Xinjiang to
the Yangtze River Delta.
Construction of the $4.8-billion project is set to start later this year.
Officials said construction would begin with the 1,600-km eastern section
from Jinbian in northwest Shaanxi province to Shanghai, where initial gas
supply is expected to land in 2003.
The longer western section connecting Tarim to Jinbian is slated for
completion by 2005, officials said.
PetroChina aims to move between 12 and 20 billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas
through the trunkline in 2005.
HUGE UNTAPPED RESERVES
Officials estimated about 720 bcm of recoverable gas reserves remain in the
Shan-Gan-Ning and Tarim basins. PetroChina's most recent big discovery in the
Sulige field in the northern Ordos basin has proven reserves of 220 bcm.
PetroChina is hoping to lure foreign firms to invest in the project,
including top three oil majors ExxonMobil , Royal/Dutch Shell Group and BP
Amoco .
Also under planning is a three bcm-per-year gas pipeline from Jinbian to
Beijing, Hebei and Shandong. Sources said Shell and PetroChina were jointly
studying the project.
A third gas line is planned from Zhongxian in the gas-rich southwest Sichuan
to Wuhan and Hunan provinces in central China, officials said.
U.S. gas and electricity firm Enron Corp is a joint developer in the Sichan
gas block, which will send supplies via the proposed 740-km line.
Sichuan, which produced 7.995 bcm of gas in 2000, is presently China's top
gas producer, according to official data.
The fourth gas pipe, stretching 953-km eastwards from Qaidam basin to Lanzhou
in the northwest, is expected to be operational in May with an annual
capacity of two bcm, according to Beijing-based industry newsletter China
OGP.
The project, which targets PetroChina's subsidiary refineries in Lanzhou,
will cost 2.25 billion yuan, China OGP said.
LONGEST PRODUCTS LINE TO MOVE OIL SOUTH
PetroChina also is set to build a 1,247-km refined products pipeline from
Lanzhou to oil-thirsty Sichuan to move surplus products out of the remote
northwest region.
A feasibility study for the line, which would be the longest products
pipeline in China, was approved recently, a senior official with the State
Development Planning Commission told Reuters from Beijing.
Officials said the project would replace rail transport and eventually cut
PetroChina's oil distribution cost.
"The railway system has a bottleneck which only allows a limited oil flow at
one time, and it's much more expensive (than pipeline)," said a Beijing-based
PetroChina official.
When built in 2005, PetroChina would be supplying five million tonnes a year
of mostly gasoline and diesel to Sichuan, one of China's most populous
province and which buys most of its oil by rail or ship from neighbouring
provinces.
($1=8.277 yuan).

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


521693 broker has us selling

thanks


Please get this info to me and I will pass it on to AA.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
02:52 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Smith@ENRON
11/06/2000 05:14 PM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monthly Gas Testing

In order for us to complete our monthly gas testing, please provide the
following items.

 P&L top sheet for the last day of August.  Additionally, if the majority of
the P&L pertains to curve shift, please provide the P&L top pages for five
of  the  largest days including the Curve Shift Reports.

  Central Firm
  Central Intra-Month

 P&L top sheet for the last day of September.  Additionally, if the majority
of the P&L pertains to curve shift, please provide the P&L top pages for five
of  the largest days including the Curve Shift Reports.

  Central Intra-Month
  FT - West
  FT-Northwest
  Mgmt- West
  West Gas Daily
  Storage (Curve shift reports only)

Thank you in advance for your help.  If you have any questions, please
contact me at 5-7346.

Sharon


Christi: As discussed, attached is a copy of a quote that the NYISO has asked me to include in a press release they plan to issue announcing the release of some draft ICAP principles that have been developed by the three northeast ISO staffs. I've discussed the quote with Sarah, and have included some new language to make clear that Enron does not support ICAP markets, but while we have them this is a good idea. I haven't shown this language to the ISO yet, as I'm waiting to hear back from Rick on whether Enron wants to be quoted at all. I'd appreciate it if you could take a quick look at the attached revised quote and perhaps run it by Rick. Thanks. Howard


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 05:49 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	07/19/2000 05:48 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 07/19/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/19/00.

Regards,
tm


The report named: West Power Desk Daily Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=24&report_name=West+Power+Desk+Daily+Position+Report&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/27/2001>, published as of 12/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Laura has told me that she would like for me to get together with you in order for you to show me around the joint Enron & People's Energy website used in the Chicago office.  I would be happy to do this anytime in the next few days at your convenience.  The advantage of being a brand new intern is that I don't have many scheduling difficulties.

--Phil


FYI,   hgm
---------------------- Forwarded by Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron on
08/02/2000 02:31 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sheila Walton @ ECT                           08/02/2000 08:22 AM

To: Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Status Report - ENA NI/Issues - Manager/Director Level

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 08:20
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Knudsen @ ENRON                           08/01/2000 06:30 PM

To: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status Report - ENA NI/Issues - Manager/Director Level

Per Dave's note below - sounds like he want to insure the managers are
staying on top of this and wants proof.  Please keep working with the
managers and push this through.  Any that you have now, please forward to me
so I can update the status report and forward to Dave.

Thanks

Sheila

David W Delainey@ECT
08/01/2000 06:13 PM
To: Sheila Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron,
John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Status Report - ENA NI/Issues - Manager/Director Level

Shelia, to ensure we are all on the same page, I am looking for a copy of the
review plus a written plan to rectify performance or counsel out from each
supervisor.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
06:10 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Knudsen @ ENRON                           08/01/2000 05:33 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Status Report - ENA NI/Issues - Manager/Director Level

Attached is a report reflecting the status of ENA Manager/Director level
employees who were rated either Needs Improvement or Issues at the mid-year
process.

We will update this report on a weekly basis.

Let me know if you have any questions regarding this - X36628.


I believe this advice letter has the windowing information I need.  It is no
longer available on their website (too old!)

Can someone in your office please get a copy?

Thanks

Stephanie


info on the inspection for draw # 19 i/a/o $289,056.53.

By the way congratulations on your new position as CEO with Enron.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Temica Lacy
Sent:?? Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:46 AM
To:???? Fernando Parra
Cc:???? Shelly Lambert
Subject:??????? Jeffrey Skilling/#10386513

Have received the inspection back and the following has been noted:

1. Carpet (scheduled value $35,000.00) drawing $15,750.00.? Not completed.?
No credit given.

CO #21

1. Hardware (scheduled value $42,164.11) Just started to install.

Please advise.

Thanks,

Temica Lacy
ext.1695

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

************************************************************************

The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission
is confidential.  It may also be privileged work product or proprietary
information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other
than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because
of this information is strictly prohibited.

************************************************************************


Gerald, we recently placed a $50,000 bond for HPL for Franchise Tax
Certification for you.

I understand from our broker, John L. Wortham that our surety, St.
Paul/Seaboard Fire & Marine was informed that Marsh USA will be handling the
HPL bonds effective 06-01-01 (please see attached email).

I am attaching a list of outstanding bonds that HPL has in place.   Should
these bonds be canceled? Or if these bonds are still required, you may wish
to consider placing with your new agent of record, Marsh USA.  They can
either be replaced all at once or just prior to expiration.

Please note while most of the bonds were placed with St. Paul/Seaboard Fire &
Marine there are a couple that were placed with Liberty Mutual Insurance
Company.

Please let me know how you wish to handle the outstanding bonds.. Thanks.

If you have questions, please give me a call 713 853-5687.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Vicie Coleman" <vcoleman@jwortham.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Vicie+20Coleman+22+20+3Cvcoleman+40jwortham+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Grisaffi, Mary
Cc: Phil Bair
Subject: Houston Pipe Line Company

Mary, we have received information from Roger Bumgarner at St. Paul/Seaboard
that Marsh USA has been appointed agent of record effective June 1, 2001 on
the HPL bonds he writes.

As you know, there are three bonds with Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and
two through Insurance Company of North America.  I presume we will  be
receiving notice that Marsh has been appointed on them, also.   However, we
have not yet received information to that effect.

Vicie Coleman
John L. Wortham & Son, L.L.P., Houston
P.O. Box 1388, Houston, TX  77251
Telephone No. 713/346-1432
Telefax No. 713/520-1260


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Quick, Joan
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Quick, Joan
Subject:	mark.sleeper@williams.com


Do you have it now?

Greg Whalley <gregwhalley@yahoo.com> on 03/16/2001 08:24:04 AM
To: whalley@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

i didn't get the email

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address -  Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.


I have a few concerns about this.  We are suppossed to be the only point of
contact for changes in tagg.  This is an internal control issue that leaves
all responsibility for errors in tagg with risk.  If other people are
touching deals in tagg, any errors will then have to be investigated further
and thus take longer to resolve.

I guess my main question for you is, does a problem exist in the current
system?  Is risk not addressing your issues and needs on a timely basis?  If
so, we need to readdress that issue and resolve it in a more timely manner.

Please let me know if the others disagree with me.

Thanks.
PL


Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Black, Don; Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Black, Tamara Jae; Harvey, Claudette; Misra, Narsimha; Meyn, Jim; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Dernehl, Ginger; Muhl, Gil
Subject:	FERC to discuss all East proposed RTOs

FERC's agenda for its 10/24/01 meeting includes "Discussion of RTO Developments" for the Northeast, Southeast (of interest, the agenda does not include the GridFlorida docket) and Midwest.  The agenda also includes separate docketed items:

-- Reliability, Security and Market Operations
-- Electricity Market Design and Structure

Claudette, TJ and Ginger -- can you please forward to your groups?  Thanks.


Get FREE* computer learning from Video Professor on a subject of your choice. For over 15 years, Video Professor has taught millions of people how to use their computers, and we can teach you too, FREE.
										  Simple 'What-You-See-Is-What-You-Do' way to learn  Plays like a video on your computer screen A complete & comprehensive lesson FREE & RISK FREE  Over 4 million satisfied users    Select from these titles available FREE...  Windows - Outlook - Excel - Access - PowerPoint - FrontPage - Works Quicken - Internet - Word - WordPerfect - Lotus 1-2-3 - DOS

											*You only pay $6.95 shipping and handling conveniently billed to your Visa, Mastercard, American Express of Discover card. When you call, you will be given the option to review additional lessons without obligation to purchase. IBM & PC compatible computers only. Limit one free lesson per household. Running time is approximately 60 minutes. Some restrictions may apply.
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++  This email is not sent unsolicited. This is an Opt in Network mailing! This message is sent to subscribers ONLY.  The e-mail subscription address is: pmims@enron.com To unsubscribe please click here. or Send an email with remove as the subject to remove@brain2002.com  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ EF5FC181-B64C-4D5D-997F-CD3D9F87F5A5


Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 12, No. 3, October 29, 2001

 Simms Throws 4 TD Passes, Benson Rushes
For 157 Yards as Longhorns Gore Tigers, 35-16

Junior QB Chris Simms and true freshman RB Cedric Benson had career-best days
and the UT defense held Missouri to just one first down in the first and
third quarters Saturday in Columbia to lead Texas to a 35-16 victory.
On a day when upsets reigned across the country, particularly in the top 10,
and five of the eight previously unbeaten teams lost, the Longhorns took care
of business and ran their record to 7-1 overall and 4-1 in the Big 12.
With Oklahoma's 20-10 loss at Nebraska, the Sooners, Longhorns and Aggies are
all tied atop the standings in the Big 12 South.
But the Longhorns have to win out and Oklahoma has to lose another conference
game for the Longhorns to make it to the Big 12 Championship Game.
Saturday's victory at Missouri was a fairly easy conquest, thanks to the
stout UT defense and a great performance by the offensive line that allowed
Simms to complete 24 of 30 passes (80%) for 229 yards and four touchdowns and
Benson to run for 157 yards on 31 carries, an average of 5.1 yards a pop.
But some strange things happened to thwart the Longhorns in the early going.
On their first drive, for example, they held the ball almost 10 minutes,
rolling 78 yards in 19 plays, but they got zero points because they stalled
at the Tiger 2 and Dusty Mangum missed the chip-shot field goal.
They also drove into Missouri territory on their second possession, but again
stalled.
Missouri finally got rolling to start the second quarter and scored first.
That seemed to wake up the Longhorn offense and it took control and wore out
the Missouri defenders.
Here, briefly, is how the game went
First Quarter
Texas won the toss and deferred. Missouri took the ball and Marcus James ran
the UT kick back to the 38. The Longhorn defense forced a quick three-and-out
and the UT offense had its most time-consuming drive of the year, going 78
yards in a laborious 10-minute, 19-play drive to the Tiger 2, but Dusty
Mangum missed the chip-shot field goal. Missouri went three-and-out again.
The Horns drove to midfield again, but stalled as the quarter ended. Texas
had a huge lead in statistics, with 7 first downs to 0 for Missouri, a 99-24
edge in total offense, and a 12:03 to 2:57 bulge in time of possession, but
the game was all even at 0-0 in the only statistic that counts.
Second Quarter
The Tigers finally got their offense untracked to start the second quarter
and drove 76 yards, primarily on the passing of QB Kirk Farmer, to take a 7-0
lead with 11:12 left. Victor Ike ran the kickoff back to the 36 and the
Longhorns went 64 yards in 10 plays to tie it up. Simms connected with WR B.
J. Johnson on the 5-yard TD toss, but the big play was a 27-yarder from Simms
to TE Bo Scaife on third-and-2 at the Missouri 32. Mangum's kick tied it,
7-7, with 5:44 left. After the UT defense forced another quick 3-and-out and
got a short punt, Simms found Scaife again on the first play for a 28-yard
gain to the MU 13. A WR reverse by Johnson got 5 yards and Benson got 5 more
and a first down at the 3 before Simms faked to Benson and hit TE Brock
Edwards for the final 3 yards and the TD. Mangum's kick gave Texas a 14-7
lead with 1:50 left. The Tigers stormed down the field in the final two
minutes, primarily on the running of 5-10, 225-pound Zack Abron, who gained
37 yards in three carries. His 16-yard tackle-breaking run to the 5 gave the
Tigers a first-and-goal, but his next try gained only a yard and Farmer threw
two incompletions before Brad Hammerich booted a 22-yard field goal to cut
the UT lead to 14-10 with 7 seconds left. The Tigers outgained the Longhorns
in the quarter, 120 to 104 yards and had a 9-5 edge in first downs.
Third Quarter
Texas got the ball and again made a long, time-consuming drive, but this time
it counted because Simms scored from the 1 to cap a 73-yard drive and Mangum
converted for  a 21-10 lead with 8:50 left. the Longhorns overcame a
third-and-11 early in the drive when Simms scrambled and found Brett Robin
for 24 yards. Vasher intercepted Farmer four plays later to give the Horns
great field position at the MU 48. The Longhorns couldn't move, but the pick
kept Missouri bottled up deep in its own territory throughout the quarter and
allowed Texas to start its possessions around midfield in a quarter that was
dominated by defense after Texas' impressive opening drive.  The Tigers made
only one first down in the quarter and Texas, after getting five first downs
on that opening TD drive, managed only one more in the entire quarter.
Fourth Quarter
The Tigers finally figured out their best offense  was to hand the ball to
Abron and he bulled for 16, 19, 3 and then 7 more for a TD. Missouri's pass
for a 2-point conversion failed and left UT on top, 28-16, with 7:41 left.
Not to be outdone, Benson shredded the Missouri defense for 11, 20 and then 4
before Simms scrambled left and found  Robin, who scampered the final 25
yards to complete a 39-yard scoring play. Mangum's kick gave Texas a 35-16
lead with 4:27 left.

Texas and the BCS

The next Bowl Championship Series (BCS) standings will be a lot different
from the first ones that were announced last week and Texas will be a lot
higher than it was in the last one.
In the first standings, which were announced last Monday, Texas was ranked
No. 6 behind five teams with perfect records. The BCS standings are like golf
in that the lowest score is the best score.
Oklahoma came in at No. 1 in the first standings at 3.06, followed by
Nebraska at 6.40, UCLA at 8.34, Miami at 12.01, Virginia Tech at 13.88, Texas
at 15.35 and Michigan at 15.91, to round out the top seven.
But a rash of upsets claimed OU, UCLA and Virginia Tech.
Since OU lost to Nebraska, the Sooners won't tumble far, but Texas should
pass UCLA and VT. Of course, Michigan is so close to Texas that the
Wolverines might pass the Horns if they keep winning.
Under the BCS formula, the top four teams in the final standings are
guaranteed berths in one of the four BCS Bowls, which are the Rose, Orange,
Fiesta and Sugar.
The Rose Bowl will get the national title game this year. Right now, that
looks like a Nebraska-Miami battle, but both teams have some big games left
before making that date.
Texas could make it to the Rose Bowl, but it would require some big upsets,
like Texas A&M or Texas Tech upsetting Oklahoma, and then Texas beating
Nebraska in the Big 12 title game.
But the Longhorns will make it to one of the big BCS bowls if they keep
winning.

Key Games for BCS Watchers

If you want to keep tabs on the Longhorns' chances to wind up in good shape
in one of the big four BCS bowls, the key is that they have to win their
final three regular season games.
Assuming that happens, here are some key games to watch for the rest of the
season:
This Saturday's key games are Michigan at Michigan State, Tennessee at Notre
Dame and UCLA at Washington State.
The big ones the following Saturday, Nov. 10, are Texas A&M at Oklahoma and
UCLA at Oregon.
On Nov. 17, Texas Tech hosts Oklahoma, Syracuse is at Miami, Michigan is at
Wisconsin and Virginia Tech is at Virginia.
On Thanksgiving weekend, Michigan hosts Ohio State, Nebraska goes to Colorado
and Oklahoma State plays at Oklahoma.
The big games on Dec. 1 are Miami at Virginia Tech, Tennessee at Florida and
Oregon State at at Oregon.
If Oklahoma loses to A&M, Tech or OSU and the Longhorns win out, Texas would
qualify for the Big 12 Championship Game on Dec. 8.
The final BCS rankings will be released on December 9, the day after the Big
12 and Southeastern Conference have their championship games.
Texas probably will be fourth or fifth in the BCS rankings to be released
today and the games mentioned above will be big determining factors in where
the Horns wind up.

Jackson, McClintock to Redshirt

It looks like senior LB Lee Jackson and junior DE O. J. McClintock will
redshirt.
Both have been out with injuries all season and head coach Mack Brown said
last week there are no plans to play them.
He said Jackson is still having troubles with his toe and his leg. He said
McClintock won't play unless the team suffers some injuries at DE.

900 Number Updated Daily

I update my 900 number every day with football and football recruiting news.
The number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 or
older to call.

Coach's Corner

The Longhorns, now ranked No. 5 in both polls after a rash of upsets
Saturday, are playing well, but they need to keep working to get better, head
coach Mack Brown said Sunday.
After studying films of the 35-16 victory over Missouri, Brown said he and
his assistants were generally pleased with the team's play.
But he said the defense will work on hard on tackling this week. "We weren't
pleased with out tackling," Brown said. "We weren't pleased one back gained
over 100 yards on us. We've got to get back to work on that."
He also said the defense did a good job in permitting Missouri to get into
the red zone only three times all day "but they scored all three times.
That's not what we want."
The offense played a pretty good game, he said, adding that tackle Mike
Wiliams "played great. He's our offensive player of the week."
Defensively, he said the player of the week is CB Quentin Jammer, who held
the Tiger's nationally ranked WR Justin Gage to two receptions for 14 yards.
He was averaging 7.5 receptions per game and ranked second in the Big 12 in
that department.
Brown also said he is concerned about some aspects of the kicking game. "We
kicked two balls out of bounds on kickoffs," he said. "We've got some issues
there we've got to correct."
He said backup LB Reed Boyd, who plays on several of the kicking teams, "was
our special teams player of the week."
Asked how he prepares his team for games like the next two, against Baylor
and Kansas, when the opponents are losing and struggling, he said, "Baylor
played A&M and Oklahoma tough. Our guys need to play football because they
like playing it. If they can't get excited about playing football, they don't
need to be playing football at the University of Texas."
He also said, "Our guys need to understand that everyone wants to knock them
off."

The Perfect Christmas Present
For Horns Who Have Everything Else: A Gift Subscription to True Orange and/or
the E-Mail/Fax
A subscription to True Orange is the great gift you can give again and again.
Sure beats Christmas shopping, birthday shopping or anniversary shopping.
The only thing better is  a gift of  True Orange and the True Orange Fax  -
and you can give both for just $130 a year ($99 if they take both by e-mail).

o  I am enclosing $45 for a gift subscription ($35 e-mail)
o  I am enclosing $130 for a gift subscription to the newsletter and the fax
($99 e-mail)

Name of Recipient

Address (& fax no., if applicable)

City, State, Zip

Your Name

Any Message You Want on Card


Carol

Can you sit in on this call with me ?   Thanks
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 11:46 AM -----

	"Andy Katz" <AKatz@eei.org>
	05/29/2001 11:31 AM

		 To: <louv@acespower.com>, <fhilton@aep.com>, <lrgroff@aep.com>,
<Christine_Schwab@dom.com>, <Francine_Mathews@dom.com>,
<rsbaker@duke-energy.com>, <pjpa@dynegy.com>, <mtwilliams@edisonmission.com>,
<RReyna@energyusa.com>, <Tracy.Ngo@enron.com>, <ed.zabrocki@msdw.com>,
<william.mccoy@msdw.com>, <daniel.sarti@neg.pge.com>,
<Jeremy.Weinstein@pacificorp.com>, <kabedin@powersrc.com>,
<Shari_Stack@reliantenergy.com>, <cward@utilicorp.com>,
<mcrocker@utilicorp.com>, <pharrod@utilicorp.com>, <william.dudley@xemkt.com>
		 cc: <martyjo.rogers@axiaenergy.com>, <hemu@dynegy.com>,
<elizabeth.sager@enron.com>, <jcrespo@hess.com>, <wfhenze@jonesday.com>,
<dperlman@powersrc.com>, <rosteen@powersrc.com>, <drusso@reliantenergy.com>,
<babak.pooya@southernenergy.com>
		 Subject: Conference Call for Collateral Annex Group

Since I will be traveling on Friday - we had to change the conference call on
Thursday 2pm EST...If you are able to participate, please call
1-800-.860-2442  In addition, based on responses received regarding
availability to date, we are tentatively planning to have the working group
meeting in Houston during the week of July 23rd.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
 - Andy Katz.vcf


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Pete Van De Gohm@EES
	02/26/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Michael Hicks/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Draft NPC Report

Steve:

Need to met with you before May 8th, but would like to do it in the next 2
weeks,  to discuss Enron's position on this NPC report.  I am currently
coordinating with Andrew Parsons, Mark Holsworth etc.  Rob sent me a copy of
the 2 Feb 2001 NPC update letter and draft executive summary received by Ken
Lay.  I sent Rob a note outlining the questions I saw the report raising form
an Enron perspective.  Comments below.

Pete

---------------------- Forwarded by Pete Van De Gohm/HOU/EES on 02/26/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

Rob Bradley@ENRON
02/26/2001 09:57 AM
To: Pete Van De Gohm/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michael Hicks/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Draft NPC Report

This is important enough to get Steve Kean's direction just to make sure all
the right people are in the loop.  I am not the right person, although Lay
sent me a note on it.

- Rob

	Pete Van De Gohm@EES
	02/26/2001 09:36 AM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Michael Hicks/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Draft NPC Report

Rob:

Thought I'd send you the latest draft of the report, it's 85-90%  final (the
recommendations are 100%).

Questions the report raises for Enron:

Is Enron part of the oil & natural gas sector or the banking and finance
sector?  Both are looking at information sharing mechanism to mitigate risks
to IT systems.  The Banking & Finance sector has been operating an
information sharing and analysis center (ISAC) for over a year.  Discussions
with members of the banking and finance sector indicate it has value.

If Enron is a part of the oil & natural gas sector, are we willing to take a
leadership role and enter into a potential LLC with other Council member
companies to form an ISAC for this sector? Cost to Enron would be based on
number of individuals receiving alerts etc., however, it could be as low as
$13K per year.  An additional cost would be to appoint an employee to the
LLC's governance body to ensure Enron's needs were addressed.  Archie Dunham,
CONOCO's Chairman, has agreed to champion this initiative if the Council
recommends it at the 6 June  meeting.

Current coordination:

The legal issues have been worked by a sub-group lead by Tom Carmel, CONOCO.
Mark Holsworth, Corp. Legal has been our representative.  Recent DOJ action
regarding information sharing to mitigate IT risks seems to indicate that
anti-trust will not be an issue.  Steptoe & Johnson, LLP have undertaken a
review of the liability issues and suggested ways to mitigate them.

Mike Hicks and I have been working with Mark Thibodeaux, Corp. IT Compliance,
and will be meeting with Steve Kean and others in the security and IT
protection efforts in next two weeks.

Recommendation:

Enron participate fully in the oil and natural gas sector's efforts - As
Enron becomes more and more dependant on IT, having a mechanism that provides
tailored vulnerability information and solutions in a "one-stop-shop" format
is valuable and can lead to reduced insurance premiums.

Pete
---------------------- Forwarded by Pete Van De Gohm/HOU/EES on 02/26/2001
08:02 AM ---------------------------

Marshall Nichols <mnichols@npc.org>@listmail.npc.org> on 02/25/2001 06:59:43
PM

 -  CIP CSC Draft 2-25-01.pdf


Hey guys,

Please use the following for accounting for MHEB / Eservices deals in Enpower.

Thanks,
Don

	This request is complete, effective upon refresh of the EnPower System.

	      CP/ID:				103582
Long Name:			EPMI-MANITOBA-HYDRO
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-MHEB-SVCE
Power Portfolio:			SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:				same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:			Power Desk-Houston

	      CP/ID:				103583
Long Name:			EPMI-Southeast-Public-Service-Administration
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-SPSA-SVCE
Power Portfolio:			SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:				same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:			Power Desk-Houston

 	      CP/ID:				103585
Long Name:			EPMI-MOBILE-SVCE
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-MOBL-SVCE
Power Portfolio:			SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:				same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:			Power Desk-Houston

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Velasco, Jennifer
Sent:	Monday, July  16, 2001 5:26 PM
To:	Arnold, Thu Pham; Ebow, Amber; Schott, Samuel
Cc:	Blevins, Jennifer; Jenkins, Jason; McIntyre, Burton; Trevino, Susan
Subject:	New Power Books
Importance:	High

Please set up this power book request ASAP and advise when done.

Thank you!!

Jennifer Velasco
Risk Controls
X 5-2526

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dahlke, Andrea
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	Velasco, Jennifer
Subject:

Long Name:			EPMI-MANITOBA-HYDRO
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-MHEB-SVCE
Power Portfolio:		SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:			same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:		Power Desk-Houston

Long Name:			EPMI-Southeast-Public-Service-Administration
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-SPSA-SVCE
Power Portfolio:		SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:			same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:		Power Desk-Houston

Long Name:			EPMI-MOBILE-SVCE
ERMS Short Name:		EPMI-MOBL-SVCE
Power Portfolio:		SVCE
Power Sub-portfolio: 		SVCE
Traders:			same as EPMI-MDEA-SVCE
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:		Power Desk-Houston


IN THE MONEY: Hedge Funds Say Yes To New Enron Terms

   A Dow Jones Newswires Column

  NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- News that Enron Corp. (ENE) and would-be suitor
and savior Dynegy Inc. (DYN) are working to renegotiate their merger
agreement has done little to assuage market jitters about Enron's fate.

Published by: Dow Jones News Service
Date: 11/27/2001
Word Count: 758
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 100
Folder Name: Enron Corp.

Full-text article available at
http://nrstg1p.djnr.com/cgi-bin/NewsRetrieval?cgi=WEB_ST_WC_STORY&DBNAME=DJNS&HDAN=DJ0133101604&Search=Enron%20Corp.%3A0000001529&QID=1529&QT=S&HDSC=DJ

Articles are included at no charge for flat-fee corporate customers. (Under standard pricing, charges apply.  For details, click the $ icon on the Dow Jones Interactive home page, located at http://www.djinteractive.com.)
______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


hi gerald,  where do we stand in getting and agency agreement between ENA and
crescendo?

thanks


Hey ...
Just wondering if you're at work ?  Get my message yesterday?
Angie

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here


Clement,
Attached are clean and blacklined drafts of the Enron guaranties for the
Indian Mesa II project.? In each, we have changed the materiality threshold
from $50M to $100M and removed the brackets from Oregon as Enron's state of
incorporation.

Lee

 <<6191664 blk>>  <<6191688 blk>>  <<6191858 blk>>  <<6191664-Enron Guaranty
of Purchaser's obligations under PPA (Renewable Energy Purchase Agreement)
for Indian Mesa II>>  <<6191688-Enron Guaranty of Green Premium Sharing
Agreement for Indian Mesa II project>>  <<6191858-Enron Guaranty of Seller's
obligations under PPA (Renewable Energy Purchase Agreement) for Indian Mesa
II project>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - 6191664 blk.DOC
 - 6191688 blk.DOC
 - 6191858 blk.DOC
 - LA1-6191664-Enron Guaranty of Purchaser's obligations under PPA (Renewable
Energy Purchase Agreement) for Indian Mesa II.DOC
 - LA1-6191688-Enron Guaranty of Green Premium Sharing Agreement for Indian
Mesa II project.DOC
 - LA1-6191858-Enron Guaranty of Seller's obligations under PPA (Renewable
Energy Purchase Agreement) for Indian Mesa II project.DOC


Tim will be speaking from 12 - 1 today in Mt Hood.

All other sessions will be 11 - 12

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dunton, Heather
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Classes 11-12 Mt Hood

Please join Enron Training Sessions 11-12  MT Hood.
The goal is to provide an overview of each major function in our office to anyone who is interested in learning about what goes on here.

Schedule:

1/4 Tim Belden - Floor Overview

1/7 Matt Motley  - Term Trading
1/8 Sean, Diana, Richter - Cash Trading / California Market
1/9 Stewart, Paul, Foster - Middle Market / Services
1/10 Tim H - Fundies
1/11 Alan - Regulatory

1/14 Donald - Scheduling
1/15 Bill - Real Time
1/16 Scotty - Volume Management
1/17 John - Risk Management
1/18 Susan, Steve, Christian - Credit & Legal

1/22 Todd - Structuring


Thaniks for the note.  Christie is now organizing our university
relationships, so direct the communication to her.  Thanks again

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/09/2000 05:59 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Fletcher School/Enron

Dear Steve:   Last month while at my reunion at the Fletcher School of Law
and Diplomacy
at Tufts University, some of the school officials told me that Enron has
hired about eight
Fletcher graduates recently and is happy with them.   The school is also
happy and wants
to strengthen its relationship with Enron.   They had earlier this year
contacted a Laura
Kalmans, Director of Community Development at Enron, to discuss various ideas
for cooperation
with Enron that would strengthen our capacity in environmental matters and
give the students
exposure to real world issues, but nothing happened and they lost contact.

They asked me who they should contact to find out how to pursue this and I
said
I thought it might be you or someone under you.    They now want to send a
letter
to someone at Enron on this proposal.  It is OK if it is addressed to you or
should I tell
them another name?   Please advise me how to steer them in the right
direction.

Many thanks.  David Merrill

---------------------- Forwarded by David Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/09/2000 06:33 PM ---------------------------

Laura Karch <Laura.Karch@tufts.edu> on 09/05/2000 03:15:08 PM
To: david.merrill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fletcher School/Enron

Dear Ambassador Merrill,

I understand that you and Betsy Ginsberg had a conversation at reunion last
month about a possible
partnership between the Fletcher School and Enron.  Thank you for generously
offering to help us
explore this connection.  We believe there are strong synergies between
Professor Bill Moomaw's
International Environment and Resource Policy program and Enron's business
model.  There is
currently a strong recruiting relationship between Enron and Fletcher; there
are nine Fletcherites
at Enron at this time.  I'm confident that our strong recruiting relationship
is a solid first step
from which to launch an even stronger partnership.

In order to explore expanding this relationship Ms. Elise Kalmans, Director
of Community
Development, agreed to arrange a meeting for Bill and me last spring.
Unfortunately, the scheduling
did not work out, and Ms. Kalmans then began a maternity leave so we had
trouble identifying a new
point of contact.

I appreciate your suggestion that we aim to work through Stephen Kean.  As
Senior Vice President for
Public and Environmental and Government Affairs, he does sound like the ideal
contact with whom to
discuss Professor Moomaw's program and its students. How do you suggest we
proceed?  Should we send
a letter from Interim Dean Trachtman to ask if Mr. Kean would be willing to
meet with Professor
Moomaw?  May I mention that you suggested we write him?

At Betsy's suggestion, I have attached the presentation outline we prepared
for Enron, along with
the letter we originally mailed to Elise.  I would be very interested in any
suggestions you may
have.  If you have any trouble opening the powerpoint file or word document,
please let me know and
I would be happy to mail or fax them.  Thank you again for your kind offer of
assistance.

Sincerely,

Laura Karch
Associate Director, External Relations
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy
617-627-2720

 - IERP enron.ppt
 - enron Kalmans.doc


Ken:

Joe and I have visited with Jeff Skilling and Joe Sutton on major themes for
Enron's oral history, and Joe Pratt has written down some questions we will
ask tomorrow.

We have had 7 interviews so far (including Jack Bowen and Bill Strauss) but
will pick up the pace in early December when Joe is through with his
semester.  Next summer will also be a very active time.  Charls Walker is
scheduled, and we will get on the calendars of some of the older folks (HNG
directors) in the next weeks.

- Rob

	Joeprattuh@aol.com
	10/18/2000 07:50 PM

		 To: Rob.Bradley@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Lay Visit

Rob,

In our earlier meeting with Lay, he seemed to want to talk about changes in
the corporate "visions" over time. He also seemed interested in exploring the
idea of corporate culture. Both of these themes can be included under the
broad heading of strategic vision and the creation of a corporate culture
capable of pursuing that vision.

Specific questions are more difficult to imagine at this point. I think we
should rely on the general approach taken with Skilling and Sutton: How were
the various "visions" that have guided Enron's development been defined? How
were they achieved? What do you see as the key issues that should be
addressed in our history?  Who are the crucial "cluster" of people to
interview for each issue? How do you see this project being used within Enron?
I'll bet we can have a very productive hour with these general questions.

- Joe Pratt


CONGRATULATIONS ON THE CLOSURE OF THE ALAMAC/AIG TRANSACTION!! Fantastic
effort and job well done from beginning to end! I don't remember the other
folks involved on your deal team but I do know this deal would not have
happened had it not been for you three! I remember when we started this last
July (remember the $1 DASH ?!), the hurdles that kept popping up (oh, just a
little bankruptcy proceeding), and the s-l-i-c-k structuring of the entire
transaction. Bought if for $3.5 million, sold it for $26 million, marked an
incremental $5 million on a coal contract, and still have the right to
"broker" another sale and keep 90% of the proceeds ( another $10+ million)!!
Pretty awesome.

This was really a great job by all! Let me know the date of the celebration
dinner!


How are you with the following counterparties for this transaction: Coral, Duke, Dynegy, Reliant?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"DeVeny, David" <David.Deveny@Bmo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	'jarnold@enron.com'
Subject:

John:

Bank of Montreal would like to take Enron up on the offer you made this
afternoon to help balance our short swap exposure with your organization and
replace it with a third party Enron may have offsetting transactions with.
Per our conversation, to offset the contracts that we are short to Enron,
our position would allow us to accommodate the following transactions:

Buying five and a half (5.5) contracts a day December 2001 (Z01) natural gas
last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying sixteen and a half (16.5) contracts a day January 2002 through
December 2002 (F02-Z02) natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to
a third party
Buying four (4) contracts a day April 2003 through October 2003 (J03-V03)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying two (2) contracts a day January 2004 through December 2008 (F04-Z08)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party

If you find an appropriate offsetting positions please contact me at
212-605-1475.

Thank you,

David DeVeny
Bank of Montreal
Commodity Derivatives Group

****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.


This is the draft copy of the Global Standards Report, primarily for ENA, for
September 2000.

Please review and provide comments.

Thanks,
Mike


I am looking for the merger documents dated 12/30/99 wherein Devon Energy
Corp. merged with Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., and PennzEnergy
Exploration and Production Company, L.L.C.  If you've got a copy can you fax
it to me via 646-3490.  Thanks!


Ramiro Castano

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:40 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject:

what is ramiro's last name?


Clayton,

It translates into a credit risk for those on the other side of the hedge.
Many producers have a long history of poor timing of hedges.
I could give you quite a long list. They definitely need a bright
adviser who will tell them the price of gas two years from now.

Vince

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	06/29/2000 01:02 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: from today's paper

Vince:

Here's an amazing factoid in today's paper related to the issue of how much
money you can "make" (sic) by hedging:

...

Other companies analysts say are saddled with hedges include El Paso Energy
Corp. and Coastal Corp., which are merging.

A Coastal official declined to comment on the company's forward positions.

Although El Paso is known for its pipeline business, it produces gas as
result of its $6.2 billion acquisition last year of Sonat. "More than 90
percent" of that gas is hedged through the rest of the year, said Bruce
Connery, vice president of investor relations. The forward contracts are for
$2.40, he said.

Hedging in the current market plays to the company's primary aim of meeting
investors' expectations, Connery said.

"Our first goal is to deliver the earnings goal that we set out, and that
dictates that we hedge out commodity volatility," he said.

...

$2.40??? Are you kidding????

Clayton


> Yesterday, I was on the bus travelling home from work. A man of
> Arabic-appearance got off at the stop before mine and I noticed that he
had
> left his bag behind. I grabbed the bag and ran after him, caught up with
him
> and handed him back his bag. He was extremely grateful to me and when he
> checked the contents of his bag I noticed what appeared to be large
bundles
> of banknotes and white powder. He looked around, Made sure nobody was
> looking and whispered to me:
>
> "I can never repay your kindness sir, but I will try to with a word of
> advice for you and your friends: Tell everyone you care about to stay away
> from the University of Alabama. I was terrified. "Is there going to be a
> terrorist attack?" I whispered. "No, sir", he whispered back "It's a shit
> hole."
>
>
>
>


I just spoke with Matt Commons, and he is going to join enron, but didn't
know of the additional sign on  (5k to 10k).  Also, he will be joining our
finance area as his first rotation.  Thanks.  Jeff


I have reviewed the attached revised guarantee and find it acceptable, but
for the following two minor items:

Paragraph 2:  As I discussed with Sara (and she found this acceptable), we
prefer to be more specific and replace the proposed "the nature of the
claim" with "the underlying agreement and the parties thereto".

Paragraph 8:  The insertion at the end of the Paragraph should begin with
"Capitalized".

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Samantha.Boyd@enron.com [mailto:Samantha.Boyd@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:05 PM
To: barrettp@coned.com; douglasp@coned.com; rozmusg@coned.com;
jaina@coned.com; lublingc@coned.com; irwinp@coned.com; fortem@coned.com;
dooleys@coned.com
Cc: Janelle.Scheuer@enron.com; Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Please find attached our final draft of the Guaranty.   I have also
attached a red-lined version for your convenience.  Should you have any
questions, please contact me at the number referenced below.

(See attached file: Guaranty(Consolidated Edison Co of NY) - A (RED).doc)

(See attached file: Guaranty(Consolidated Edison Co of NY) - A.doc)

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com << File: Guaranty(Consolidated Edison Co of
NY) - A (RED).doc >>  << File: Guaranty(Consolidated Edison Co of NY) -
A.doc >>


Start Date: 12/15/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121507.txt


pena - 1:30; Spurling @11:15 and D'Amato @12:00

11:15 D'Amato
12:00 Sperling
1:30 Pena meeting  - Tentative
3:30 Janel Guerrero

Flying up on company plane.


Brant:
Aquila Canada has been striking the "affiliate" language in the setpoff
provisions of Annex A to the Onibus confirmation.  Are you okay with this?

Carol


FYI - I'll let you know what she finds.

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
01:19 PM ---------------------------

Lora Sullivan
05/29/2001 10:51 AM
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Calls to/from Commissioner Hebert

Maureen,

I've checked Linda Robertson's call sheet from January 2001 and do not find
any record of incoming calls from Commissioner Hebert to Linda.
Nonetheless, she may have initiated a call TO him.

I'ved tried to reach Linda on her cell phone -- no success.  Perhaps Rick
could raise this question with Linda when he joins her on the 11:00 AM (CDT)
conference call today?

I'm also checking with Sarah Novosel and Joe Hartsoe -- both of whom are out
at meetings at the present time.  When I get any responses I'll let you know.
Thanks for holding down the fort!

Lora

	Lora Sullivan
	05/29/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Request from Rick Shapiro

Rick Shapiro has asked for a list of calls received (or calls made to)
Commissioner Hebert since January, 2001.

Please advise.

Thank you.

Lora


I spoke to Waymon Pong and Ken Ertman with PG&E today about the Electronic Commerce contract and discussed TW's concerns about the broad nature of the terms. I explained that all TW wanted was to have the ability to Nominate in PG&E's system when TW executed a Market Center deal. It turns out that TW has not lost it's ability to nominated in PG&E's system nor does it depend on TW signing the new contract, the new contract was meant to govern electronic contracts on the Marketing side of the deal. TK can continue to do her deals as she does today (fax and phone) and Customer Services Reps. can go into PG&E's PipeRanger system to nominate contracts.

If you have any questions please give me a call ext. 37429

John Buchanan


This is to confirm tomorrow's USEC Meeting with Richard Kingdon and Michael
Woo.  The meeting will take place in EB3321 @ 10:00a.m. on Tuesday, March 21.

Many Thanks,

Liz


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 04:00 PM -----

	TeiglandL@sullcrom.com
	03/15/2001 03:52 PM

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: second try: Allegheny ISDA side letter

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Allegheny  ENRON side letters(v1).DOC


Why didn't we have the following language in the tax payment section:
;
.; "In no event shall Payments in Lieu of Taxes include, apply to, or be
required to be made for Real Property Assets and/or Tangible Personal
Property exempt under Florida Statutes in existence as of the Effective Date
or any date prior to commencement of operations of the proposed Facility, as
such statutes may be amended from time to time."
;
Somehow this was missed because we didn't follow the Pompano form closely
enough...;
-----Original Message-----
From: Krimsky, Steven
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mann, Kay
Subject: FW: Deerfield Beach Energy Center

This is the City's red-line against our draft.
;
I will call to discuss.
;
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Maurodis <attorney03@deerfieldbch.com>@ENRON
Sent: Thu 6/7/2001 10:31 AM
To: 'orshefskyd@gtlaw.com'
Cc: Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: Deerfield Beach Energy Center

attached is revised agreement (staff presently reviewing).

Please acknowledge receipt.

Andy Maurodis

;<<73PB05! (1).DOC>>

;- 73PB05! (1).DOC <<73PB05! (1).DOC>>


Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 7900 MMBtu/dy effectuve 10/12/00.

The redeliveries will be 7900 MMBtu/dy from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL.


ENW Ventures Portfolio News
PentaSafe testing new security software

HOUSTON, Dec. 7 (LocalBusiness.com) -- PentaSafe Security Technologies Inc.,
which develops Internet security products, said testing begins this month for
its newest software, which provides security for Web servers used in
e-commerce.
The Houston-based company's new software, VigilEnt Security Agent, is
designed to protect information in the server from intrusion, loss and damage
from both internal saboteurs and external hackers. It is expected to be
available to the general market in the first quarter of 2001.
The new product extends the company's current offerings, which protect
operating systems, applications and databases.
Steve Latham, vice president of strategic planning and development for
PentaSafe, said the new software provides more than 100 system checks as
online businesses prepare to move into production mode. It makes
recommendations on how to secure identified risks and "lock-down" the secured
system. Once the system is in operation, it continues to monitor and detect
incidents.
"It is important especially for companies that are in a hurry to test before
they go into production," he said. "A lot of times they rush through to get
things ready and make some mistakes in their application servers so that they
are not secure."
"It looks at 'is your system set up right?' and 'who has access?' as to who
can make changes," Latham said.
PentaSafe's new software locks down and secures the server, just as a
homeowner secures the window and doors of his home "before the storm comes,"
he said.
The new software is designed to work with BEA Systems Inc.'s (Nasdaq: BEAS)
WebLogic Server 6.0, the latest release of BEA's Java application server.
PentaSafe could potentially work with other vendors as well, Latham said.
_____________________________________________________________

o Softbank/Vivendi Venture @Viso Closes Two Offices

PARIS -- European incubator @Viso, a joint venture
between Vivendi and Softbank aimed at assisting
U.S. Internet companies gain market entry into continental
Europe, said it will close its offices in Spain
and the Netherlands. It will also suspend plans
to open a Milan, Italy office. Managing director
Daniel Scolan said the company had been seeking
new investment opportunities from those offices,
but decided to concentrate on current portfolio
companies at its Paris and Munich offices.
http://www.atviso.com/
_____________________________________________

o Emulex Acquires Giganet for $645 Million

COSTA MESA, Calif. -- Emulex, a publicly traded
supplier of Fibre Channel host adapters, said it
has agreed to acquire Giganet, a developer of IP
networking services in a deal worth approximately
$645 million. Emulex will acquire Giganet for approximately
4 million shares in common stock and assumed options.
Giganet will become the IP Networking group of Enulex.
Neil Ferris, Giganet president and CEO, will take
a seat on Emulex's board of directors. Giganet Inc.'s
investors include H&Q Venture Associates, Innocal,
Mariposa Investment Holding, Merrill Lynch, NTT
Leasing, Telsoft, and W.R. Hambrecht.
http://www.giganet.com/
http://www.emulex.com/
_____________________________________________

o E-Business Platform Verano Acquires Agilent Subsidiary

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Verano, which delivers an electronic
business platform for integrating business processes
and providing measurement and reporting capabilities,
said it has acquired Agilent Technologies' Automation
Integration Software business based in Calgary,
Alberta. The financial terms of the deal were not
disclosed. As part of the acquisition-deal, Agilent
will take an equity stake in Verano. Verano was
founded in 1996 with funding from TechFarm, Chase
Capital Partners, Deep River, and Charter Venture
Capital.
http://www.verano.com/
http://www.agilent.com/
_____________________________________________

 Jeffrey I. Snyder
Enron Net Works Ventures
jeffrey.snyder@enron.com
713.345.8746 (o)
713.646.2126 (f)


Jeff -

On the call will be Scott Tomashefsky from the CEC and Daniel Poller from
McKinsey will be present as well, strictly in a background, secondary
capacity.  There may also be some members of the Resource Agency's Natural
Gas Working Group as well.  They were invited as a courtesy.  Hope this
answers your questions.  Thank you, again.

Regards,

Michele

Michele Yoskovich
McKinsey & Company
555 California Street, Suite 4700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-318-5093
Fax: 415-318-4627

<Jeff.Dasovich@
enron.com>             To:     <Michele_Yoskovich@mckinsey.com>
03/22/2001             cc:
12:31 PM               Subject:     Re: Dial-In Info for Call w/Mary Nichol's
representatives

Will do.  Do you know yet who will be on the call from your end?  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

<Michele_Yoskovich@mck

insey.com>                    To:
jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc:

03/22/2001 02:05 PM           Subject:     Dial-In Info
for Call w/Mary
Nichol's representatives

Hello Jeff -

Due to logistical complications, I've had to go to a Dial-In number for our
call with you tomorrow.  So, if you could, at 1:30pm PST on Fri, Mar 23,
dial:   877-322-9648, Partic. Code:  329 193

Thanks for your cooperation.  Let me know that you got this information.

Thanks again,
Michele

Michele Yoskovich
McKinsey & Company
555 California Street, Suite 4700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-318-5093
Fax: 415-318-4627

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+