that night i had so  much brain damage i couldnt function.

as opposed to ????

"Lafontaine, Steve" <steve.lafontaine@bankofamerica.com> on 05/07/2001
06:29:44 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: you shudda been in vegas

was a great time-sat at bo collins dinner table spoke briefly. by that nite
i had so  much brain damage i couldnt function.

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:31 AM
To: LaFontaine, Steve
Subject: Re: its never gonna break

your guys are probably seeing this as well, but, 50 cents higher our
customer biz was 95/5 from buy side.  now it's 50/50.  can almost smell
blood among the producers.  only problem is trade is sooooo short they cant
see straight.  were the market still not so fundamentally overvalued right
now i'd be looking for a 25 cent move up.  just can't see that happening at
this level though.

********************Legal Disclaimer**************************
This email may contain confidential information and is
 only for the use of the intended or named recipient.  It
has been prepared solely for informational purposes
from sources believed to be reliable, and is not a
solicitation, commitment or offer.  All information is
subject to change without notice, and is provided
without warranty as to its completeness or accuracy.  If
 you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this email and its attachments
(if any) is strictly prohibited and may be a violation of
law.  If you have received this email in error, please
immediately delete this email and all copies of it from
your system (including any attachments), destroy any
hard copies of it, and notify the sender.  Thank you.


Actually that doesnt sound very funny to me.  I mean what the fuck did he do
that for? What was he so mad about? I can imagine that you would be scared
seeing him act like that.  Hopefully he doesn't ever act like that or show
that kind of temper around you.  Anyway its really none of my business i
guess.  I appreciate the sentiment about my family and I will mention it to
my mother.  I hope you feel better.


Jeff Skilling asked me to send you his new e-mail address.  It is:
jeff.skilling@enron.com.  Please let us know if you need any additional
information.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
jeff.skilling@enron.com


FYI, in case you weren't aware.  The below volumes flowed on Dayton's
contract.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
02/09/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------
   Kara Destephanis                02/09/2000 10:27 AM

To: Joann_Collins@enron.com
cc: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Megan
Kovach/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Add'l Gas at COH

Joann,
Apparently the way our contract works, if we have the primary capacity
available I can request gas from you and it will be priced at GDA Columbia
App.  Otherwise we have to price it through Brian/Chris.  Could you please let
me know if we are able to serve these volumes using old CES contracts:

Mkt 5-2  9615 dth total

Mkt 7-1  7600 dth total

Mkt 7-8  321 dth total

Thanks Joann!

---------------------- Forwarded by Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas on
02/09/2000 10:23 AM ---------------------------

Megan Kovach
02/09/2000 10:22 AM

To: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject:

brian ,
could you please get me a price for the following acts
thanks
megan
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Kovach/CES/ColumbiaGas on 02/09/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

Megan Kovach
02/02/2000 09:09 AM

To: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject:

Brian ,
Please buy gas for the following cust for feb these bad boys just landed in my
lap.....FUN FUN FUN
City Of Brea COH-5 Market area 2    870dth
Hawkins Center COH-5 MArket Area 2    480dth
medina county sanitaion COH-5 Market area 2   3028dth
Parma South Pres COH-5 MArket area 2   434dth
Medina County Commiss COH-5  MArket Area 2
4803Dth
Moore Business Forms  COH-7 MArket area 1   7600Dth
Granville IGA   COH-7 Market area 8   321Dth
I am Checking on East Liverpool School of ed and Glacier Vandervell
Thanks
Megan


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/17/01.   Please note that
Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Resources and Sierra Pacific Power
Company were all placed on NO TRADES and Select Energy, Inc. was placed on
Call Credit.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Hello all!

Since we all seemed to survive the "Y2K" bug, we are going to celebrate!

Our "Holiday Millenium" party will be this Saturday.

See attached for information, if you have questions, please call me at 3-5290.

See you there!

Shirley


>                                           AGENT AA/TR BOOKING REF YMFYYA
>
>                                           TAYLOR/MARK E
>                                           EB 3889
>
>   ENRON CORP
>
>
>
>
>
>   DATE:  AUG 21 2001
>
> SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE
>
> CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  26OCT HOUSTON TX     FT LAUDERDA FL 705P    1035P
> CO 1748    V          FRI   G.BUSH INTERCO FLL INTL
>                             TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 1
>                             SNACK                         NON STOP
>                             RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:30 DURATION
>                   AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-800
>                             SEAT 06C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED TAYLOR/MARKE(ID
>
> CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  28OCT FT LAUDERDA FL HOUSTON TX     555P    733P
> CO 249     B          SUN   FLL INTL       G.BUSH INTERCO
>                             TERMINAL 1     TERMINAL C
>                             SNACK                         NON STOP
>                             RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:38 DURATION
>                   AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-900
>
> MISCELLANEOUS         25FEB HOUSTON TX
>                       MON   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **
>
> RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/VF92WS
>
> TAYLOR/MARKE  S0C0413R1056
>
> CO  FREQUENT FLYER COSC471253
> ASSISTANT: HOLLY KEISER 713-345-7893
> *******************************************
> INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
> CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
> CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
> *********************************************
> HIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
> TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
> ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
> ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
> FARES CHANGE FREQUENTLY. WE WILL HAPPILY RE-EVALUATE
> YOUR FARE UPON REQUEST.
> *****************************************************
> THE FARE IS $263.32 NON- REFUNDABLE
> ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED
>
>
>
>
> Teresa
>


Oh, I don't know.............. I guess about as many times as you have to say
"don't do anything unless I ask you to."  Attached is the Schaeffer
Memorandum of Option that Piper Rudnick prepared (just in case they decide to
go ahead and the Option executed today or next week).  The Schaffer's should
probably execute at the same time, don't you think?

Kay Mann
02/09/2001 01:58 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Titan-Schaffer Option

How many times do I have to say EMAIL IT?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001 01:57
PM ---------------------------

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 02/09/2001 11:55:08 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Shindler, Donald A. - CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>,
"Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: RE: Titan-Schaffer Option

Kay:
Just to clarify.  The "blacklined changes" in the fax I sent to you come
directly from the document that you sent to us yesterday.  We will let you
know as soon as we hear anything further.

Thanks, Karen

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Way, Karen S. - CHI
> Sent:   Friday, February 09, 2001 11:45 AM
> To:   'kay.mann@enron.com'
> Cc:   Shindler, Donald A. - CHI; Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI
> Subject:   Titan-Schaffer Option
>
> Kay:
>
> This is to confirm that I have faxed to you at 713-646-3491 the following
> documents:  i) a copy of the cover fax-letter to Mr. Al Freehill, attorney
> for the Schaffers; and 2) the blacklined changes to the Schaffer-Titan
> Option for Mr. Freehill's review per your changes yesterday.  Please call
> Don or me with any questions on this matter.
>
> Karen S. Way
> Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
> 203 N. LaSalle
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
> email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
> (ph) 312-368-2152
> (fax) 312-630-6347
>
____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Done

Jackie Young
02/18/2000 09:57 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 98-6892 Overflow

Daren,

Per Victoria Versen, you can roll deal 166888 forward for one day to cover
the 14 decatherms that flowed on the 15th.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497

Daren J Farmer
02/17/2000 10:44 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 98-6892 Overflow

jACKIE,

You need to talk to the East desk to see if they were allocated this extra
gas on the 14th and 15th.  If they were, we can change the deal.  If not, the
pipes will need to balance out during the next flow day.

D

Jackie Young
02/17/2000 08:37 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-6892 Overflow

Can you please extend sitara deal ticket 16888 to the 15th?  14 dec. flowed
on this day.

Thanks
-Jackie-


Hi Susan,

I changed the code so that it feeds the Ostrip model as Larry (?) requested
by using the formula to derive BasisOffset. In the attached file is the
comparison between the old valuation and the one after the modification.
Please not the changes on the premiums. Please let me know if you or Larry
have any questions/comments on this.

Shouan


Jeff,
I can't sleep and have been cleaning out emails.  Not my favorite past time
at 2:30am.  I didn't see the draft reorg memo we've been talking about for a
while.  Please send it to me for my review.  I think it is important to get
something out and i believe that people expect some changes
Thanks, m.


Hi there,

Just a note to say hello.  Hello.

Nit Noi sounds good to me tonight, if we don't eat out of the fridge.  I'm
having a craving for ethnic food.

Love,

Kay


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BOWEN, ROBERT J                 LARRY J HUNTER                  Nov 01, 2000
CAMPOS, ANTHONY                 LINDA S BRYAN                   Oct 31, 2000
DIEBNER, BRADLEY M              WILLIAM S BRADFORD              Nov 06, 2000
NEVES, MICHEAL T                SCOTT N CLEVERLY                Oct 25, 2000
SEVER, STEPHANIE G              LISA LEES                       Oct 30, 2000


Who is authorized to sign on behalf of this company?

Thanks,

Kay


Discuss Settlement Period 9 Cash Out Results


Ok, since I have not seen or heard from you, I'm tossing you nameplate.  Maybe my woman will let me put it up in the bedroom, the one we are moving into on Monday.


Sheri,
We are going to NO for JazzFest at the end of April.  April 27th-29th to be
exact.  Let me know if you're going.
DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
03:07 PM ---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  02/20/2001 09:13 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, jennifer_lamprecht@oxy.com, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: southwest.com weekly specials

Would you guys be in for an April b'day trip to New Orleans?  These flights
are dirt cheap.  Thought maybe just fly up late morning on a Sat and come
back Sun morning.  We need to move pretty quick though....

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 09:10
AM ---------------------------

"Southwest Airlines" <special-offers-help@mail.southwest.com> on 02/20/2001
03:24:40 AM
Please respond to "Southwest Airlines"
<special-offers-help@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers1@mail.southwest.com>
cc:
Subject: southwest.com weekly specials

Southwest Airlines e-mail update for
February 20, 2001

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials
II. southwest.com Click 'n Save(R) Specials
III. Other Discount Fare Special Offers Including
 Las Vegas $99/$119 Each Way Extended!
IV. Click 'n Save Subscriber Information

*****Southwest $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials******

I. $30 Each Way for 30 Markets (limited time, only)

This week's 30th Anniversary Specials
(for the following markets, only) are:

Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA

Chicago, IL  Midway
 $30 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX  Hobby

Dallas, TX  Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL  Midway

El Paso, TX
 $30 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Houston, TX  Hobby
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Indianapolis, IN
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL  Midway

Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Providence, RI

Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Lubbock, TX
 $30 each way to/from El Paso, TX

New Orleans, LA
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX  Hobby

Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX  Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM

Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Providence, RI
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Sacramento, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

San Antonio, TX
 $30 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

San Diego, CA
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from San Jose, CA

San Jose, CA
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Seattle, WA
 $30 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $30 each way to/from Seattle, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $30 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Tucson, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

For a limited time, we have extended the
number of markets from 5 to 30.
The 30 markets will change each week,
so, please keep checking back.

The following restrictions will apply:

*21-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel March 13, 2001 through May 23, 2001.
*Purchase beginning February 20 through
 February 22, 2001, midnight Pacific Time.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve the
Southwest Airlines 30th Anniversary Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/

******* southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials********
II. In addition to the 30 markets for the Anniversary
Special, we have included the traditional
southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials.

The following restrictions will apply:

*21-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel March 13, 2001 through August 4, 2001,
 except for May 25 and 28, 2001
*Purchase beginning February 20 through
 February 22, 2001, midnight Pacific Time

Albany, NY
 $64 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $59 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Albuquerque, NM
 $62 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $40 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Amarillo, TX
 $61 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $61 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $61 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Austin, TX
 $60 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $43 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $55 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $34 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $34 each way to/from Providence, RI

Birmingham, AL
 $60 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $45 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Boise, ID
 $34 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Buffalo, NY
 $64 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $34 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Burbank, CA
 $34 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Chicago, IL Midway
 $64 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $66 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $34 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Cleveland, OH
 $59 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $60 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $62 each way to/from Providence, RI

Columbus, OH
 $41 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $62 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $62 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $40 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Dallas, TX Love Field
 $59 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $36 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Detroit, MI
 $55 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 each way to/from Omaha, NE

El Paso, TX
 $60 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $73 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $59 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $65 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $66 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $49 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Houston, TX Hobby
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Indianapolis, IN
 $45 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $55 each way to/from Omaha, NE

Jackson, MS
 $62 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $65 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $43 each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $45 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $36 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $62 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $34 each way to/from Burbank, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $41 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $55 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Los Angeles, CA
 $73 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $45 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Louisville, KY
 $34 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $55 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Lubbock, TX
 $40 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $43 each way to/from Austin, TX

Manchester, NH
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $68 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $57 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Nashville, TN
 $64 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $68 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $38 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

New Orleans, LA
 $43 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $38 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Oakland, CA
 $44 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $49 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Oklahoma City, OK
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $59 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Omaha, NE
 $62 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $55 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Ontario, CA
 $45 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $37 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Orlando, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $34 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Portland, OR
 $44 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $44 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Providence, RI
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $34 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $49 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $45 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $54 each way to/from Spokane, WA
 $70 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Salt Lake City, UT
 $49 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $40 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $59 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

San Diego, CA
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Jose, CA
 $37 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $44 each way to/from Portland, OR

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $56 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Spokane, WA
 $34 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $54 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Tampa Bay, FL
 $45 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $62 each way to/from Columbus, OH

Tucson, AZ
 $70 each way to/from Sacramento, CA
 $34 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $36 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve this
week's Click 'n Save Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/

*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares.html

******** This is the Additional Information section********
Additional Information You Need to Know About All
of Our Sales:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel Online may only be purchased with
 a credit card. Customers holding funds from
 a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
 who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
 those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods, such as President's Day,
 Spring Break, and Easter.

*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

********* Other Special Offers from Southwest**********
III. Coast to Coast is back!  Travel on Tuesday,
Wednesday, or Saturday for only $99 each way.  Travel
on Monday, Thursday, Friday, or Sunday for only $119
each way.  For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_c2c.html

Also, we have 11 shorthaul markets to/from St. Louis
on sale for only $30 each way.  Please visit us, for
more information, at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_c2c.html

********************Friends Fly Free! ***********************
Providence, RI to/from Long Island/Islip, NY $49 Each Way
Take advantage of the special offer by selecting
available flights in the DISCOUNT FARES
column. Note: You must select an even number of
Passengers during the booking portion to get the
correct pricing breakdown.  Friends Fly Free fare is not
combinable with other fares and ticketed passenger
and companion must fly together.  For more information,
please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_FFF.html

*******Las Vegas $99/$119 Each Way Extended!********
Purchase Las Vegas travel through March 15, 2001
Travel on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Saturday for only
$99 each way.  Travel on Monday, Thursday, Friday,
or Sunday for only $119 each way.
For details and additional information, visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_LAS.html

****************** Subscriber Information *******************
IV.  Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/
****************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sthomas@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-99521519R@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Any time a unit is going to come up and it is not on the dispatch please call to inform and to double check with the person sending out the dispatch we have their cell #'s for this reason.  Ask me with any questions thanks,

Mike


I have drafted the attached letter denying the Cal ISO's request to send it
(and the EOB) EPMI and EES' cost information for transactions over the FERC's
cost cap.  Since I believe we are on very firm ground, my initial inclination
was to send no response to the ISO's letter, so there would be nothing to
quote in the press.  However, I drafted this letter at Alan's suggestion for
purposes of discussion.  We should decide whether to send a letter before
distributing this draft more widely in-house to discuss how to parse the
message.


I think Andy will be the one we need to get together with initially to
discuss Click Paper.  He may want to run it by her, but now that this is
official, I think we should approach him first.  Any thoughts?

Thanks
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
08/25/2000 06:12 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill W Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bruce Garner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jay Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen R Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allan Sommer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, michael.k.patrick@enron.com, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, EOL Product Control@ECT, Product Control -
London, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Product Control - Houston, Lydia
Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason
Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa
Mandola/Corp/Enron@Enron, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Weatherstone/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary.Weatherstone@enron.com, Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina
Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele
Beffer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosie
Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Norma Yeverino/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina
Gutierrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Rios/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa
Carranza/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jessica Ramirez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Martinez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Graves/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Karsolich/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Michael.Guadarrama@enro.com, Bob Hillier/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Reorganisation

I am pleased to announce that Andy Zipper will taking over responsibility for
EnronOnline.

Please join me in congratulating Andy.


AT THE CALL OF LINDA ROBERTSON THERE WILL BE A CA ENERGY WORKING GROUP
MEETING ON MONDAY, June 18, 2001 at 4:00 PM (EDT).

PLEASE BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS ALL AGENDA ITEMS (AGENDA WILL BE EMAILED
UNDER SEPARATE COVER.)

The meeting will be held at the Enron offices:
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC

For those of you not in Washington, DC please call:
800-713-8600; Code 6261


My fax is 403-974-6706

-----Original Message-----
From: Mills, Scott
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 8:43 PM
To: Zufferli, John
Cc: Liscano, Christina
Subject: RE: Owens Canada

Hard copy only. I will have Christina follow up with you to get a fax number and she will send you the document.

SRM

-----Original Message-----
From: Zufferli, John
Sent: Fri 9/21/2001 2:49 PM
To: Mills, Scott
Cc:
Subject: owens

I received a spreadsheet from Richter but do you have any contract documentation?


When: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB39C1 and OMA3C1

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


I'm tellling everyone that I'm taking off tomorrow.

ckm


Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
February 1, 2001 P.M. Edition

STATES
WASHINGTON -- WUTC sets line sharing, OSS transition, collocation prices

CONNECTICUT -- DPUC tells WorldCom to change collect call notification
policy
MICHIGAN -- Gov. Engler makes high technology a priority
NORTH DAKOTA -- House passes bill to adopt UETA
MISSISSIPPI -- UETA bill set to reach Senate floor
NEBRASKA -- Judiciary Committee to consider cellphone bill
MICHIGAN -- Legislation would prohibit telemarketers from blocking
Caller ID
HAWAII -- Bill would prohibit 'cybersquatting'
TENNESSEE -- Filing fees for telephone cooperatives would rise under
bill
NEW YORK -- Bill would require written notice before terminating service
contracts
UTAH -- PSC to hold technical conference on number conservation
WASHINGTON -- WUTC sets workshop on customer notice rules
FLORIDA -- New '386' area code to take effect soon
NEW YORK -- Time Warner Cable brings VoIP test to Rochester

SECTION 251/252
WASHINGTON
WUTC sets line sharing, OSS transition, collocation prices

The Utilities and Transportation Commission has set a $4 flat fee for
use of the high-frequency portion of the loops in operating areas
service by Qwest Corp. and Verizon Northwest, Inc.  The commission also
determined that Verizon may recover up to $1.98 million and Qwest may
recover up to $5.5 million of their operation support system (OSS)
transition costs.  In addition, the commission addressed several
collocation elements in its order, which was issued yesterday.

This decision addresses Part A of a second generic proceeding to
determine costs and prices for network elements.  During the first
generic proceeding, the commission set the costs and prices for
unbundled network elements (UNEs), including the unbundled loop.  The
first proceeding, which was split into three phases, set costs and
established deaveraged prices for interconnection and UNEs.  The second
proceeding addresses network elements not included in the first
proceeding.

The WUTC rejected the proposal espoused by many of the competitive local
exchange carriers (CLECs) for an exemption from making any contribution
to the recurring costs of the loop.  Instead, the WUTC set a $4 flat fee
for line sharing.  The commission also said it was premature to
determine whether a non-zero price for the high frequency spectrum UNE
would lead to overearning for Qwest or Verizon.

When the commission examined cost recovery issues related to the
modifications Qwest and Verizon made to their OSSs to support a
competitive environment, it determined that Verizon's proposed rates
were just and reasonable.  Verizon's nonrecurring charge for OSS
transition cost recovery is $3.27 per local service request, and its
nonrecurring charge for OSS transaction costs recovery is $3.76 per
local service request.

The WUTC rejected Qwest's proposed OSS transition recovery costs and
ordered the company to charge OSS transition and transaction rates equal
to Verizon's approved rates.  The commission noted that Qwest's proposed
costs were too high--more than twice the level reported by
Verizon--because the company doesn't perform its own OSS modifications.
Qwest relies on Telcordia Technologies, Inc.

The commission allowed Verizon to collect a maximum of $1.9 million and
allowed Qwest to collect a maximum of $5.5 million for OSS transition
costs.  Multiplying Verizon's proposed collection derived the value
assigned to Qwest's OSS recovery by the approximate ratio of Qwest's
access to Verizon's access lines within the state.

The commission also took up a variety of collocation issues.  Verizon
doesn't have to continue offering its Verizon-owned splitter option
beyond Dec. 15, 2000, on lines not currently using the company's
splitters.  The commission found Qwest's assumption that the average
cable length is 100 feet to be reasonable.  It approved Verizon's
estimates for planning and engineering time.  Other collocation issues
addressed in the order include Verizon's costs for cage enclosure and
building modification, efficient splitter configuration, Verizon's
jumper costs, and Verizon's environmental conditioning.

Hearings for Part B of this proceeding are scheduled to begin March 26.
The order is available at
http://www.wutc.wa.gov/webdocs.nsf/6f30f546379903ad8825652a005e07f2/d0c1a5d5db
085e78882569e50082ac29!OpenDocument.
(Docket no. UT-003013, In the Matter of the Continued Costing and
Pricing of Unbundled Network Elements, Transport, and Termination)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
CONNECTICUT
DPUC tells WorldCom to change collect call notification policy

The Department of Public Utility Control has ordered WorldCom, Inc., to
provide advance notice before imposing a collect call blocks on
customers' telephone numbers.  The DPUC's decision adopts a draft order
released last month.  (1/17/01 p.m.)

In March 1999 the DPUC launched an investigation into WorldCom's
blocking procedures in response to complaints that the company had
prevented the completion of collect calls from prison facilities.
Families of inmates said WorldCom didn't notify them that collect calls
would be blocked, even though they always paid their collect call
charges.  Under the company's current tariffs, WorldCom can block
collect calls from correctional facilities without notice.

WorldCom places collect call blocks to prevent "high-toll fraud
situations."  The company identifies end users with unusually high
numbers of collect calls.  It then assesses the end user's payment
history and whether the end user has verified that the calls are
legitimate.  If WorldCom is unable to verify the legitimacy of the
calls, it places a block on the end user's line.

The department determined that WorldCom's procedures are reasonable for
most customers but concluded that the company needs to make more of an
effort to notify a "small segment of the end user population" that is
being maligned by the company's procedures.

The department, however, removed language from last month's draft that
said the imposition of a collect call block constituted "a form of
termination of service."  The department instead simply ordered WorldCom
to revise its notification procedure to "ensure that every end user
subject to the imposition of collect call blocks on intrastate services
shall be provided advance notification."

If WorldCom can't reach a customer by phone and can't provide written
notice by overnight mail, it must use a "live agent" to find the
person.  WorldCom can initiate a collect call block without actual
notice only after trying the options for three days.

The department gave WorldCom until Feb. 25 to change its procedures and
directed the company to submit a written copy of the new procedures by
Feb. 28.  WorldCom also must file status reports each month through
June.  (Docket No. 99-03-37, DPUC Review of MCI WorldCom, Inc.'s Collect
Calling Notification and Termination Policies)

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MICHIGAN
Gov. Engler makes high technology a priority

One of the initiatives Gov. John Engler (R.) outlined in his State of
the State address is ensuring "unfettered access to the information
economy."  During his speech yesterday, Engler said local governments
shouldn't be allowed "to erect stoplights and expensive tollbooths on
the information highway."

The governor said he has asked the Public Service Commission, the
Michigan Economic Development Corp., and the e-Michigan office to
recommend immediate reforms.  The Economic Development Corp. assists
businesses seeking to expand or relocate within the state, and
e-Michigan oversees the government's initiative to provide information
electronically.

Engler said, "We need to eliminate excessive access fees.  We need to
curb lengthy negotiation.  We need to curtail costly delays.  The public
interest demands that we break the grip of these broadband bandits."

INTERNET
NORTH DAKOTA
House passes bill to adopt UETA

The House has passed by a 95-3 vote a bill that would create a Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act to provide a legal structure for transacting
business over electronic media.  (1/2/01 p.m.)  HB 1106 has been
referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

MISSISSIPPI
UETA bill set to reach Senate floor

The Senate Committee on Appropriations has passed SB 2678 to enact the
Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), clearing the way for the
bill to proceed to the full Senate.  Earlier this week the Senate
Committee on Fees, Salaries, and Administration also approved the
measure.  (1/30/01 p.m.)

The bill, introduced by Sen. Neely C. Carlton (D., District 22), aims to
facilitate e-commerce by giving electronic records and signatures the
same legal effect as their pen and paper counterparts.

WIRELESS
NEBRASKA
Judiciary Committee to consider cellphone bill

The Judiciary Committee has scheduled a hearing for tomorrow to consider
a measure intended to reduce the number of traffic caused by drivers
using wireless phones.  LB 42 would create a "rebuttable presumption of
negligence" if a driver were in a traffic accident while using a
wireless phone.  Sen. David Landis (I., District 46) introduced the
measure.

The committee is scheduled to meet at 1 p.m. in Room 1113 of the State
Capitol.  Because the committee is scheduled to hear six other bills
tomorrow, it's difficult to predict what time LB 42 will be addressed, a
legislative staff member told TR.  It's "possible but not probable" that
the committee will vote on the measure tomorrow, the staff member said.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
Legislation would prohibit telemarketers from blocking Caller ID

Rep. Chris Kolb (D., District 53) has introduced HB 4126 to prohibit
telemarketers from blocking residential telephone subscribers' Caller
ID.  HB 4126 would prohibit local exchange and interexchange carriers
from providing any network element or service to a telemarketer that
would block or otherwise interfere with a residential subscriber's
Caller ID.

The measure has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Technology.

INTERNET
HAWAII
Bill would prohibit 'cybersquatting'

Rep. Avery B. Chumbley (D., District 6) has introduced SB 1276 to
prohibit "cybersquatters" from registering Internet domain names that
are widely recognized trademarks.  The measure would prohibit profiting
by selling the domain name to the trademark owner.  SB 1276 would add a
new cybersquatting section to chapter 482, Hawaii Revised Statutes,
which pertains to trademark protection.

SB 1276 would make it illegal to register in bad faith a domain name
that is the same as or "confusingly similar" to a mark that is already
famous at the time of registration.  The bill would allow courts to
consider several factors in determining bad faith, including the degree
to which the domain name reflected the name of the person who registered
it.  Courts also could consider whether the person who registered the
domain had used the name previously in offering legitimate goods and
services.

Individuals could bring a civil action against alleged violators of SB
1276 seeking several types of relief, including compensatory damages,
punitive damages, and injunctive relief, which would force the offender
to relinquish the domain.  Instead of seeking actual damages and
profits, the individual filing the suit could choose to receive
statutory damages of between $2,500 and $100,000 per domain name.

SB 1276 has been referred to the Economic Development and Technology
Committee, the Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Housing Committee, and
the Judiciary Committee.  Its text is available at
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessioncurrent/bills/sb1276_.htm.

FUTURE OF REGULATION
TENNESSEE
Filing fees for telephone cooperatives would rise under bill

Rep. Frank Buck (D., District 40) has introduced HB 355 to increase the
fees telephone cooperatives pay to file certain documents with the
secretary of state.  HB 355 would boost the amount telephone
cooperatives pay to file articles of incorporation from $25 to $30.  The
fee for filing articles of dissolution would jump from $15 to $20, and
the filing fee for a certificate of change of principal office would
increase from $5 to $10.

The bill's text is available at
http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/bills/currentga/Bill/HB0355.pdf.

WIRELESS
NEW YORK
Bill would require written notice before terminating service contracts

Sen. Charles J. Fuschillo (R., District 8) has introduced SB 880 to
require mobile telephone carriers to provide written notice of the
termination date of long-term customer contracts.  The notice would have
to be provided at least 45 days before the contract's termination date.

The measure is intended to help customers whose mobile service contracts
have a provision allowing the provider to continue service after a
contract expires for another term at a new rate if the customer fails to
request termination.  Fuschillo hopes written notification will enable
consumers to "shop for a plan that better fits their needs, or to shop
for more up-to-date equipment or type of service."

The bill has been referred to Consumer Protection Committee.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT
UTAH
PSC to hold technical conference on number conservation

The Public Service Commission has scheduled a Feb. 22 technical
conference to review the resources available to meet its numbering needs
for the relief plan it ordered for the "801" number planning area
(NPA).  In August the commission ordered a number pooling trial to take
place in the 801 NPA.  (8/11/00 p.m.)

The issues discussed at the technical conference will include
conservation measures being used, measures that may need modification,
and measures that may need to be implemented to ensure efficient use of
the existing numbering resources.  (Docket no. 99-999-04)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
WASHINGTON
WUTC sets workshop on customer notice rules

The Utilities and Transportation Commission has scheduled a Feb. 28
workshop to discuss its customer notice rules.  The commission has
proposed moving the rules from the tariff rule to the industry-specific
rules.  During the workshop, participants will have the opportunity to
comment on the placement of the rules and their content.

Comments are due Feb. 20.  (Docket no. U-991301, Utility
General-Tariffs, Chapter 480-80 WAC)

NETWORK MANAGEMENT
FLORIDA
New '386' area code to take effect soon

Florida's new "386" area code will take effect Feb. 15 in several
counties that were split from the "904" area code last fall, the Public
Service Commission has announced.  The PSC voted to split the 904
numbering plan area in September 2000, and North American Numbering Plan
administrator NeuStar, Inc., assigned the 386 area code in November
2000.  (11/28/00 p.m.)

When the 386 area code takes effect, permissive dialing will begin for
Columbia, Flagler, Hamilton, Lafayette, Suwannee, and Union counties and
parts of Volusia, Putnam, Alachua, and Gilchrist counties.  Mandatory
dialing is scheduled to begin Nov. 5.

ADVANCED SERVICES
NEW YORK
Time Warner Cable brings VoIP test to Rochester

Time Warner Cable has expanded its trial of local Internet telephone
service to the Rochester, N.Y., area from the initial test site in
Portland, Maine.  The service, which is being marketed to Time Warner
Cable's Internet service provider (ISP) customers as an additional
offering, uses voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) technology.  The
Rochester test will include up to 1000 of the company's ISP customers in
part of Monroe County, N.Y.

Time Warner Cable said its Portland test has shown "excellent customer
acceptance," adding that market research in New York indicates that
between 40% and 50% of its ISP customers would subscribe to the VoIP
service.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Brandi Kerns, E-mail: bkerns@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


I agree.  The draft with Lindy's changes still makes our point.  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke, Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject:	RE: SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding

I'm a little nervous actually commenting that we have Shipper imbalances.  Here are my comments.

 << File: SoCalCPUCAdviceLetter11-20-01.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke, Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject:	SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding

Attached is a draft of the letter that we propose to send to the CPUC regarding the AL2837 proceeding in which SoCal Gas is proposing changes to its "windowing" criteria. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. We need to file this tomorrow, so please communicate any comments to me by the close of business today, if possible. Thanks.

 << File: 11-21-01 Transwester Advice Comments 2837-A - DRAFTl1.doc >>


The attached file contains our latest daily volume requirements for 3/14 thru
3/16.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-14-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


ALL ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND

Post MBA, Post Internet Start-Up Career Decisions 2001 Joint program Univ.
Mich. alumni, Haas alumni

Panel topic questions: o???????What short and long-term trends can be
expected in Bay Area job market for director level and above, executive
candidates? o???????What are up and coming industries or fields in the Bay
Area job market. How can those jobs best be accessed?
o???????Assume a job candidate has experience at Internet start-up companies,
perhaps several over the past 2 years. How should Internet start-up
experience be leveraged towards next career decision? How should this
experience be presented to next potential employer, especially if the
companies went out of business? Will candidates be penalized if they have
jumped from Internet start-up to Internet start-up over the past several
years?
o???????How does the job market of San Francisco compare to that of Silicon
Valley/South Bay? Is it worth it for residents of San Francisco to commute or
relocate to Silicon Valley/South Bay?
o???????What skills or experiences are necessary to make the jump from senior
director level to vice president? From vice president to COO?
o???????In the past few years there was a glut of senior job titles at
start-up companies. Do you believe some people will have to downgrade their
title in their next career moves?
o???????Assume a job candidate has received an MBA degree from a top ranking
school 5 years ago and has successfully progressed up an executive level
management career. At that point, what is the relative importance of the MBA
on the resume, versus the experience and accomplishments?

Target Audience:?
MBA Graduates and soon to be graduates
From University of Michigan, Haas School of Business, Kellogg, UT Austin,
Tuck. Other MBA alumni clubs invited. Director to Vice President Career
Level, mostly high tech and software related fields

Panel Members:
o???????John Morel, Associate Director alumni Career Services Haas School of
Business
o???????Craig Smith, Consultant, Heidrick & Struggles,
o???????Brian McDugal, Vice President, Management Solutions,
o???????Margaret Steen, Careers Reporter, San Jose Mercury News,
o???????Moderator: Gretchen Alarcon, Director of Human Resources, Icarian,
Inc. (UMBS MBA 1997),

Date and Time:
Wednesday, May 2nd
Networking reception 6:00 p.m.?
Panel presentation 7:00 pm

Location:
Scores Restaurant? Conference Center
2200 Bridgepointe Parkway in San Mateo
650-357-1998

Directions:
Take Highway 101(or 280) to Highway 92 East before the San Mateo Bridge. Exit
Mariner,s Island Blvd. ramp. Make a right turn at the light onto Mariner,s
Island Blvd. Make a right at next light onto Fashion Island Blvd. Follow into
Bridgepointe Center at 2200 Bridgepointe Parkway. Free parking.

Event Contact Person:
Christine Mohan, 415-440-3367


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Kevin P. Hannon
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: New York and London Trips
Report Total: $15,986.78
Amount Due Employee: $15,986.78

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:58 PM
To:	DL-NETCO Gas Traders; DL-NETCO Power Traders
Cc:	Forster, David; Mandola, Teresa; Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject:	**IMPORTANT** Stack Manager Users
Importance:	High

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


I will be out of the office Wednesday 11/21/01.  You can ask Jessica Presas or Laura Vuittonet to assist you.

Thanks
Ina Rangel


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: SpreadmatrixCL77.pdf)(See attached file: crude77.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - SpreadmatrixCL77.pdf
 - crude77.pdf


I switch back and forth from night to day shifts it depends on the week.  I
have been working day shifts this week.  I would say I would like to watch
the game but I am actually going to the game.  What about a beer later in the
week or this weekend.  I think Johnson might be in town soon, I reecieved an
email from him this week.


FYI...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------

stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com on 11/20/2000 10:08:44 AM
To: lale@dynegy.com, rwhyde@duke-energy.com, kdenne@enron.com,
bob.escalante@powersrc.com, rllamkin@seiworldwide.com,
paula.hall-collins@williams.com, jmball@ns.net, smutny@iepa.com,
steven@iepa.com, kedson@ns.net, mwilson@pstrategies.com, kaplan@iepa.com,
rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com, knorton@mcnallytemple.com,
kassandrag@calpine.com, jackp@calpine.com, joer@calpine.com,
john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com, curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com,
roger.pelote@williams.com
cc:

Subject: Cal-Tax

Reliant has recently joined the California Taxpayers Association and I
attended their Board meeting last week.  I recommend that all CA generators
and market participants join the group.  It is likely that there will be
tax legislation impacting our industry; it would be to our advantage to
have an active, well-respected group on our side during any legislative
battles.  When there was a threat of a windfall profits tax on  the
gasoline companies earlier this year, Cal-Tax responded quickly and helped
stop the effort.

As the legislative rhetoric heats up we need to start thinking about
becoming more proactive.  This membership is one way of getting help on tax
issues.  I encourage others to suggest other proactive steps we might take
individually or as a group.  And while I'm at it ---  I also recommend
membership in Cal. Manufacturers Assoc.

The Cal-Tax membership is very reasonable, $10,000 for a Board position and
5,000 for corporate non-Board level.  The group has very good information
and email services which your tax people would appreciate.  For information
on membership, pls call Joyce Showalter, 530/335-4032.  Currently Duke and
Reliant are board members; I'm not sure if any others are members.  Pls
call if you have questions.


Thank you, Rebekah.  This works very well for Ken.

Rosie

   Rebekah Rushing @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS                09/19/2000 01:23 PM

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ken
Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
R Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J Miller/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anabel
Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lilia Roman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Quarterly EBS Technology Committee Review Meeting

Per Kevin Garland's request, I've scheduled the following meeting.

DATE:  October 4, 2000
TIME:  3:30 - 4:30 pm
PLACE:  50M03

Thanks!

Rebekah Rushing (rebekah_rushing@enron.net)
Enron Broadband Services
Broadband Ventures group
713-853-3273 - phone
713-646-8010 - fax


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Katherine L.
Sent:	Friday, April 19, 2002 3:45 PM
To:	'lvalencia@Hess.com'; 'beverly.b.beaty@williams.com'; Homco, Meredith; Garcia, Clarissa; Patton, Anita K.; Germany, Chris; Denetsosie, Troy; Bryan, Gary; Lamadrid, Victor; Allwein, Robert; Garza, Maria
Subject:	Fun for when your bored....

http://www.cmi-lmi.com/kingdomality.html


Please assign.  This is an Annex A for a general corporate.  An Annex B
should be attached.  Both Annexes should read SAMPLE or DRAFT with our
exclusionary language.  Obviously the Annex B will not have anything on it
other than reference to credit determination.  Please e-mail today to John
Malowney.  Thanks.  SS  and call if you have questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/09/99 01:32
PM ---------------------------

John Malowney
11/09/99 12:07 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sample agreements

Being that the potential counter party is Fred Meyer (AKA Kroger Co.) I would
consider them a general corporate.  JOHN

Sara Shackleton
11/09/99 07:03 AM
To: John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sample agreements

Before I send the draft, please let me know the type of customer (general
corporate, utility, municipal, etc.).  Thanks.  Sara

John Malowney
11/08/99 06:26 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sample agreements

Sara, would you e-mail me a sample Master ISDA and "two page" confirmation
that I can forward on to a customer in regards to a financial fixed for
floating swap.  Thanks !!    JOHN


Rob -- This info is great.  For use w/ the media, we'll need to simplify, and
it would be helpful to have specific examples of what a utility would pay and
the overall result of a market with price caps, the current "open" market
(under ISO regulation, buying from the PX) and a pure open market (using
hedges to manage risk).

thx.
kd

	From:  Rob Bradley                           07/21/2000 01:40 PM

To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: Generic One-Pager on Price Caps

Here is a one pager on the general problem of price regulation.  Next we will
need to discuss the particular cases and identify specific distortions, which
the field people will have to provide.

- Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 07/22/2000
01:34 AM ---------------------------

James D Steffes@EES
07/20/2000 11:01 PM
To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Generic One-Pager on Price Caps

Rob --

I think this is a great start for the outline of policy reasons against price
caps.  If possible, let's run it by PR to see what more structure they want.

Jim

Rob Bradley@ENRON
07/19/2000 02:56 PM

To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Generic One-Pager on Price Caps

See if this is of use and whether I need to do more.

I hope it sets a framework from which the specifics of the price cap examples
and distortions can be added.

- Rob


Per our conversations with Tony Walden at VNG, Tony has been instructed not to release any funds to Enron per Beth White, VP & Controller of AGL.  AGL is the parent of VNG.  I will be out of the office on Wednesday, but if you need any more information from Settlements, please contact Margaret Dhont, at 713-853-7683.

Here's the blow by blow:

Tuesday a.m.
Tony Walden (VNG) told Kay Khan (settlements coordinator for ENA) that he had the payment set up in their system to pay ENA $7,264,089.42, but that per Beth White, VP & Controller of AGL no payments were to be released to Enron.

Around 11:30 - Bryce Baxter contacted Beth White to find out what the issues were that would prevent payment.  Left message.

Tuesday p.m.
Around 3:00 - Bryce Baxter called Beth White again and spoke with her secretary.  Her secretary said she would send Beth a text page and would call back as soon as possible, but haven't received return call yet.

Around 4:30 - Bryce Baxter called Beth again and left another message.  Kay Khan also called Tony Walden again and left another message, letting him know we hadn't received a call back from Beth White.

David Jones has also called a couple of his Commercial counterparts at VNG/AGL today, but was not able to get a response.  I tried to talk to David tonight so I could give you specific names, but was unable to reach him.


Justin -

Further to our conversation yesterday I have reviewed the existing HDD Swap
GTC's.  In contrast to the Financial GTC's which when read with the ETA are
drafted on the basis that the GTC's only apply if an ISDA has not been
executed,  the HDD Swap GTC's have been drafted to work in unison with the
ISDA framework.  The HDD Swap GTC together with the specific documentation
for each transaction constitutes a Confirmation under the ISDA Form.   I have
made some drafting changes in this regard the most important of which is the
carve out of the language in the ETA which provides that GTC's will only
apply if an ISDA has been executed.

Incidentally - with respect to the ETA - it seems to provide that the
relevant GTC's will apply in respect of a Transaction if an ISDA is not in
place on the trade date of such transaction, however it does not seem to make
any provision for circumstances where an ISDA/Master Agreement is entered
into subsequent to the execution of a Transaction.   In such circumstances on
a literal interpretation of the ETA, the pre-existing Transaction would
continued to be governed by the GTC but future Transactions would be governed
by the ISDA/Master Agreement.  From a netting perspective this is not ideal.
Is this the intention ?

Give me a shout when you have had a chance to review the attached.

Denis


Hey Brenda,

I was wondering if you guys went to Disney World yet.  We went and had a good
time, although it was very hot.

Let me know.


Notice on the tags when we go hourly could be 30 minutes or less.   Additionally, if we use them as sink when we go hourly, they will have to be part of the day-ahead tag.   If these issues are not crystal clear with them, I have no interest in even showing an offer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

TEA is ok with allowing hourly scheduling from either internal units or to the border, as long as Enron is handling all scheduling and tags and gives sufficient notice for schedule changes.  I assured him that we would handle those functions.  So, we need to offer for:
	1)  June-Sep'02, 20MW, 5x16
	2) Cal'02, 20MW, 5x16

Billy
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 5:40 PM
To:	Braddock, Billy
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

We need the hourly option to allow for non-GTC sources, but we will deliver into-GTC border hourly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

TEA will let us go hourly 5 times per month and change the source if we go hourly, as long as the source remains a unit on the Ga-ITS.  However, he doesn't want a full 50MW block in the June-Sept period, just 40MW.  The 40MW is actually already at the high end of his range (needs 30-40MW for June-Sep).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 3:04 PM
To:	Braddock, Billy
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

Will he let us go hourly at least 5 times per month and change the source if we go hourly.   This essentially would require they provide parking and lending for up 20 MW in the Cal and 40 MW in the June-Sept.   Can we at least get a 50 MW block in the June-Sept period?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:44 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

An offer from any Scherer unit(s) would work.  He understands the odd lot will demand a premium, but I can't talk him into a round 50MW.  So, 2 pieces of energy:
	1)  June-Sep'02, 20MW, 5x16
	2) Cal'02, 20MW, 5x16

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Braddock, Billy
Subject:	RE: TEA - into MEAG

Ask him if Scherer 1,2,3 and/or 4 would work?   Let him know that an odd lot would command a $2.50-3.00/Mwh premium on top   In addition, even if we used Scherer, it would be from any one of the facilities therefore the transmission would need to be able to use any of the Scherer units as a source.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	TEA - into MEAG

TEA is looking to buy 20MW, 5x16, June-Sep'02, into MEAG.  Also looking to buy 20MW, 5x16, Cal'02, into MEAG.  I told them we may be more willing to offer into GTC.  His response was he would need to know which facility or interface would be the source (I suspect this is so he can reserve ahead to use his network transmission).

Any interest?

Billy Braddock
Manager - Enron Power Marketing Inc.
713-345-7877 (work)
713-646-4940 (fax)
713-503-2166 (cell)


January 23, 2002
Dow Jones Newswires
Calif Attorney Genl Says Likely To File More Energy Suits
Dow Jones Newswires

SAN FRANCISCO (AP)--California Attorney General Bill Lockyer said Wednesday
he is likely to file more unfair business practice lawsuits against energy
suppliers he thinks overcharged for electricity.

But Lockyer, in a telephone interview, said after a yearlong investigation
he has found no criminal wrongdoing by any energy suppliers. He said he has
discovered possible civil violations of California consumer laws prohibiting
overcharging - violations that carry no jail or prison time.

Lockyer's disclosure came a week after the state's top law enforcement
official sued Pacific Gas and Electric Corp., the parent to Pacific Gas and
Electric Co., for allegedly siphoning billions from its underling and
forcing it to seek federal bankruptcy protection.

The PG&E suit is "the first of many I would expect in the energy area to
overcome overcharges," Lockyer told The Associated Press.

"We've devoted a huge amount of investigative and lawyering time to get back
the money...generators extracted from Californians," he added.

Lockyer declined to name other companies that he would sue, but his office
has subpoenaed records from Dynegy, Enron Corp., Mirant Corp. and Reliant
Energy - all of which have denied wrongdoing. In the interview, the attorney
general did mention Enron by name, saying "we're still looking at the energy
overcharges," and he accused Enron of withholding documents.

Enron, a major energy trading concern, has filed for bankruptcy protection
following the disclosure that it misstated its earnings by hundreds of
millions of dollars.

PG&E, the only supplier Lockyer has sued, blamed its woes on a 1996
California law that left it unable to collect the full price of electricity
from its customers.

Lockyer's disclosure that he hasn't discovered criminal conduct, including
no evidence of a conspiracy to fix prices, comes nearly a year after he said
he wanted to jail Kenneth Lay, Enron's chairman. Lockyer told the Wall
Street Journal in May that, "I would love to personally escort Lay to an 8
by 10 cell that he could share with a tattooed dude who says, 'Hi my name is
Spike, honey."'

On Wednesday, Lockyer declared the statement "rhetorical excess," adding,
"So far...we haven't found criminal behavior associated with pricing
policies."

Still, the city of San Francisco has accused 13 energy suppliers of
manipulating prices in a suit that is pending in San Diego County Superior
Court.

That suit alleges the suppliers manipulated supplies to keep prices high.
San Francisco Deputy City Attorney Mark Slavin said the city doesn't have
proof of those allegations, but would uncover them as the lawsuit proceeds
in a process known as discovery.

"We think that the discovery process will uncover anticompetitive behavior,"
Slavin said.

The energy suppliers have denied the allegations.

A California legislative committee also investigating a spike in wholesale
energy costs has served additional subpoenas on Enron officials.

The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation in the
Wholesale Energy Market summoned Enron officials to appear for depositions
regarding destruction of documents. Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, and the
committee's chairman, said he's concerned that documents destroyed by
Enron's auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, were covered by a legislative subpoena
issued in June.

Dunn's committee on Wednesday also agreed to subpoena Andersen regarding the
Enron records.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
URL for this Article:
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=DI-CO-20020123-011366.djm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Copyright ? 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


This Reliant job is on http://www.energyjobsnetwork.com but I don't see it
on the Reliant web page.

http://207.68.162.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=644ba1097f27ffb3fe8705e8e47212b9&lat=1016162355&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2eenergyjobsnetwork%2ecom%2fcandidates%2fdisplayjob%2easp%3fnumber%3d2751%26code%3dnesanet

Reliant Energy
Title: Mid-Continent Gas Trader
Location: Houston, TX
Job Number: WG-0005
Sector: Natural Gas
Occupation: Trading
Education:  Bachelors/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description:
Reliant Resources, based in Houston, Texas, provides electricity and
energy services to wholesale and retail customers in the U.S. and
Europe, marketing those services under the Reliant Energy brand name.
The company has nearly 29,000 megawatts of power generation capacity in
operation, under construction or advanced development, or under contract
in the U.S. It is one of the top marketers of both power and natural gas
in North America. The company also has wholesale trading and marketing
operations and nearly 3,500 megawatts of power generation in operation
in Western Europe. At the retail level, Reliant Resources provides a
complete suite of energy products and services to 1.7 million
electricity customers in Texas ranging from residences and small
businesses to large commercial, institutional and industrial customers.
Reliant Resources currently is a majority-owned subsidiary of Reliant
Energy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duties/Responsibilities:
Responsibilities include reporting and explaining in detail trading
positions, mark-to-market evaluations, and profit and loss statements
relating to trading activities.
Must grow and sustain a profitable natural gas trading book, as well as a
natural gas transportation book for the Mid Continent and Chicago regions.
Ability to trade illiquid, uncommon points on pipelines for profit and
capture arbitrage from fuel switching capabilities. Will also assist the
Business Origination and Development group in evaluating projects and
structuring products.

Must have complete knowledge of futures, structured options, extendables,
swaps, and other financial instruments; capacity release and the management
and acquisition of pipeline capacity; the transportation system
infrastructure; and fuel switching capabilities. Understands mark-to-market
and profit and loss reports, technical evaluations and financial modeling.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Skills Required:
Bachelor?s degree required. Must have at least seven years of related
industry experience, as well as five or more years gas trading experience.
Must be able to participate in a team environment, sharing knowledge with
trading and gas control personnel and have the ability to interact with
people at all levels within and outside the company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact Information
mgibbs@reliant.com

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


What is Merrill?

Bernice Rodriguez
05/21/99 02:34 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Belco-Merrill Transactions

In regards to the revised confirmations received from Merrill, do you need
copies of the agreement as well.

The changes on the revisions are for the Payment Date and Fallback Reference
Price that Marie had asked you about.

Please advise.

BR


George,

I am back in the office and ready to focus on the project.  I still have the
concerns that I had last week.  Specifically that the costs of our project
are too high.  I have gathered more information that support my concerns.
Based on my research, I believe the project should cost around $10.5
million.  The components are as follows:

 Unit Cost, Site work, &
 builders profit($52/sf)   $7.6 million

 Land      1.15

 Interim Financing     .85

 Common Areas       .80

 Total     $10.4

Since Reagan's last 12 units are selling for around $190,000, I am unable to
get comfortable building a larger project at over $95,000/unit in costs.

Also, the comps used in the appraisal from Austin appear to be class A
properties.  It seems unlikely that student housing in San Marcos can produce
the same rent or sales price.  There should adjustments for location and the
seasonal nature of student rental property.  I recognize that Sagewood is
currently performing at occupancy and $/foot rental rates that are closer to
the appraisal and your pro formas, however, we do not believe that the market
will sustain these levels on a permanent basis.  Supply will inevitablely
increase to drive this market more in balance.

After the real estate expert from Houston reviewed the proforma and cost
estimates, his comments were that the appraisal is overly optimistic.  He
feels that the permanent financing would potentially be around $9.8 million.
We would not even be able to cover the interim financing.

Keith and I have reviewed the project thoroughly and are in agreement that we
cannot proceed with total cost estimates significantly above $10.5 million.
We would like to have a conference call tomorrow to discuss alternatives.

Phillip


is that the same as "personal reasons" ??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Addis

Don't know if you saw it, but your friend and mine Paul Addis is leaving AEP to "pursue other interests".


I am not aware of any services associated with EnronOnline which the Japanese
office might provide which could be the subject of such fees.

Dave

Susan Musch@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/01/2000 06:17 PM
To: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON,
David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan Aronowitz@ECT, Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Mario,

Yes, we should be ready to go, although the law firm we are using in Japan
(Baker & McKenzie in Tokyo) have indicated that they still have a few open
issues to follow-up on.

Baker & McKenzie have concluded that where an Enron non-Tokyo trading office
receives a payment on a swap from a Japanese counterparty, that payment
should not be subject to Japanese income tax or withholding tax.  Further,
they have advised that consumption tax (Japan's 5% VAT) should not apply to
financial transactions, although Japanese counterparties acquiring physical
product for delivery in Japan would be subject to the 5% consumption tax.

Baker & McKenzie have advised that they need to do some follow-up work with
respect to payments from options and from physical contracts as well as some
further checking on the tax treaties that Japan has with the countries where
our non-Japan trading offices are located.  I expect to have their response
shortly.

One issue that we are currently pursuing is the Japanese tax consequences of
the Enron Japan trading office providing services that benefit the other
Enron trading offices.  In this case, it may be appropriate for Enron Japan
to receive a service fee for such services.  I am in the process of
determining to what extent Enron Japan would be providing services.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information.  I will let you know of any additional developments as soon as
they occur.

Best regards,
Susan

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
05/01/2000 02:50 PM
To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Susan,

Following up on David's email, I understand we are ready to go, right?

Mario
---------------------- Forwarded by Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron on
05/01/2000 02:39 PM ---------------------------

David Forster
04/27/2000 06:28 PM
To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Mario is away until next week.

The Japanese could trade with any Enron office which is posting commodities
on EnronOnline - but are most likely to be interested primarily in the
products posted by Singapore (global products), as it provides the best
timezone overlap. Both physical and financial are possible, but none of the
physical delivery locations on EnronOnline are currently in Japan.

Dave

Susan Musch@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/27/2000 12:38 PM
To: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON,
David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Mario,

Thanks for your e-mail.  I wanted to follow up on one more point just to make
sure we have everything covered for May 1st.  Do we expect the Japanese to do
online trading with the other Enron trading offices?  If so, which offices
would they be trading with and what kind of products would be traded?  For
example, would there be physical settlement (or delivery) of product in Japan
to the Japanese customers or would there be only financial derivatives traded?

I really appreciate your help on this.

Best regards,
Susan

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
04/27/2000 10:55 AM
To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Susan,

Your understanding is correct.

Thanks,

Mario Parra Cardoso
EnronOnline

Susan Musch@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/27/2000 10:46 AM
To: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

I have a conference call set up with our Japanese tax counsel this evening
(Thursday evening Houston time).  After the call, I should be able to confirm
that there are no major Japanese tax issues once our Japan office commences
trading with Japanese counterparties through Enron Online.

However, I understand that initially, the Japan Online implementation will
only entail Japanese counterparties trading internationally (e.g. trading
non-Japanese products).  Based on this assumption, I think we're okay for
Monday from a Japanese trading office perspective.  Please let me know if my
understanding is incorrect.

Best regards,
Susan

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
04/26/2000 03:34 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Jeff,

The marketing material is on its way to Tokyo. This Friday it is expected to
be sent to clients.

As you can see, time is something that we don't have. Could you please let us
know if we are OK to go with the Japanese launch?

Thanks,

Mario

---------------------- Forwarded by Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron on
04/26/2000 03:27 PM ---------------------------

Mario Parra Cardoso
04/19/2000 03:30 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Jeff,

You are right. For the launch of EnronOnline in Japan, local clients will be
offered the ability to trade existing EOL products. Japanese products will be
offered in  the future.

Please be advised, though, that Singapore products are likely to be added to
EnronOnline before the Japanese launch. We expect Japanese clients to trade
Singapore products, in addition to the ones currently available.

Thanks,

Mario

Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
04/19/2000 03:18 PM
To: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Mario,

We have begun discussions with a Tokyo law firm regarding the various
Japanese tax issues related to EnronOnLine.  In that vein, can you please
clarify whether ENA will be offering certain Japanese counterparties the
ability to trade existing EOL products (i.e., products that are not
Japanese-based) and that such offering will commence in May, 2000, while no
Japanese products will be offered until sometime in the future?

If you would, please reply to all listed above so that we can hold
discussions this evening with out Japanese tax advisors.

Thanks for your help, and best regards,

Jeff

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
04/19/2000 10:12 AM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Jeff,

Japan is obviously the country that worries me the most since we intend to
launch the site for Japanese clients in May.

The marketing material is expected to be sent by late next week.

Please let me know how long the process for Japan may still last and if you
anticipate problems.

Brazil and Argentina are expected be launched this summer.

Thanks,

Mario

Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
04/19/2000 09:34 AM
To: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Mario,

We've begun working with our outside tax advisors.  I understand the urgency
of this matter and will see that it is moved along as quickly as possible.
In the meantime, please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
04/17/2000 04:07 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Japan, Argentina and Brazil

Jeff,

Anything new on tax issues related to EnronOnline for the countries above
mentioned?

Thanks,

Mario


Everyone,

I am beginning to receive phone calls and emails from some of the CA
businesses that Ken sent letters to on Monday.  I will be tracking these
businesses through a database, but we need to start following up with phone
calls and additional information.

I will keep you posted on who is asking for more information, and all
materials that we send to these businesses going foward.  However, I will
need your help in placing follow up phone calls.

To that end, I would like Mark and Rick to make the first two phone calls
today.  Keep in mind we sent out two letters.  Before you contact these
folks, you might want to check the list to see which letter we sent out.
(I'm attaching the final list.  The highlighted companies - 15 -  received
the letter from Ken that indicated he would follow up personally.  Everyone
else - 100 -  received the generic letter).

****Whomever you talk with, be sure and confirm the address and phone number
and names for where we should send future information (see list) thanks!!!

Mark Palmer
Ms. Kris Essell (check the spelling when you talk with her)
Public Affairs Rep to Chairman Sherry Lansing
Paramount Pictures
323-956-5202
Asked for additional materials

Rick Shapiro
Tamsin Randlett
Senior Director, Government Affairs
Gap Inc.
415-427-3516
Asked for additional materials


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042402.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


Dear Martin Cuilla,

Thank you for shopping at Sony's ImageStation.com!

This email confirms we received your order on
November 21, 2000 11:54AM PT for the following item:

-----------------------------------------------------------

Prints
10 x $0.49
(total 10 prints; $4.90)

Coupon: 10 free 4x6 prints
(Discount amount: -$4.90)

Subtotal:               $0.00
Shipping & Handling:    $1.99
Sales Tax:              $0.00
-------------------- --------
Total for the order:    $1.99 was charged to your
                              credit card ending in 9575

-----------------------------------------------------------

Your order has been assigned confirmation number 22806.
It will be custom produced to your specification with the
image(s) you included, and will be shipped via
Standard Ground shipping to:

Martin Cuilla
2218 Bellefontaine #B
Houston, TX  77030
United States

An additional email will be sent to notify you when your
order has shipped.

To check the status of your order in the meantime, go to
https://shop.zing.com/shop/sony/secure/account/
and sign-in with your ImageStation.com account.

For questions regarding your order, please contact us at:

ImageStation.com, Inc.
550 15th Street, #26
San Francisco, CA  94103
support@imagestation.com

ImageStation has a great selection of personalized gifts -
from coffee mugs to photo cookies to jewelry.  All you
provide is the picture (including logos, kid's artwork,
images from your scanner, or photos) and we'll provide the
technology to make your gift idea a reality.

There are plenty of items that can be personalized for a
birthday, holidays, or just to say "I love you."  We're
open 24 hours a day with delivery options that get your
gift there on time.  To ensure your privacy over the
Internet we always use secure commerce.

All of us at ImageStation sincerely appreciate your
business.  Please visit us again soon at
http://www.imagestation.com/


Gary/Linda/Jim,

Attached is a document summarizing our notes from the meeting with TGLO.  I wanted to provide this as a template for use in future discussions and formulation of "next steps".  Let me know if you have any corrections or additions.

Eric


You're not done yet big boy.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 05:34
PM ---------------------------

Julie Pechersky
09/19/2000 02:31 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J
Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, Selena Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Reza Rezaeian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Anna
Santucci/NA/Enron@Enron, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: We need your feedback regarding the demonstrations you attended.

We really appreciate your attendance of the demonstrations of Reuters, Bridge
and Globalview software.  Please take a minute
to fill out the attached feedback form so that we will know what you thought
of each application.  Return the completed form to me.

Thanks again for you time!

Julie
39225


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022823.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


Draw up Scheduling procedures for the deal


Yes;  That should be coming soon!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:27 PM
To:	McAdoo, Jack V
Subject:	FW: Enron Federal Credit Union Announces New Name!

Jack,  Can we get you new email address' that have star trust in the name instead of enron.com?  Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron General Announcements
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:05 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_domestic
Subject:	Enron Federal Credit Union Announces New Name!

We're beaming with excitement to share our new name with you!  It's a name that reflects the
true culture and beliefs of your Credit Union, and represents the reliable and innovative services
you expect and enjoy as a member.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

Due to the unfortunate circumstances that surround Enron Corp., we believe it is important to change our name
for the sake of our membership and our organization.  Careful consideration went into choosing a name that we
feel describes our Credit Union's trustworthiness, shining service, and extensive product line that offers value
and convenience to each of our members.

All of your Credit Union accounts remain unaffected, including your membership, loans and other account
services, as does our friendly staff.  Over the next few weeks, watch your mail and our web site (currently www.enronfcu.com) for information about our new web portal and e-mail addresses, as well as communications regarding your options to receive new ATM cards, VISA check cards, credit cards and checks.

Give us a call with any questions at 713.853.6242, or drop us a note at efcu@enron.com.  Also, watch your mail for
information about our new location coming soon!  We look forward to sharing a bright future with each of you under our new name!


I will be attending.

Thanks
MOnika Causholli
Enron Industrial Markets

-----Original Message-----
From: Betty Thompson [mailto:thompson@resourceinfo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:04 AM
To: 2001.Conference-Coronado.Island@mailman.enron.com
Subject: RISI Conference - 2001

October 9, 2001

Dear Conference Attendee:

We thank you for registering for RISI's 16th Annual North American
conference in Coronado Island, California.  This email is to confirm that
you will be attending and to ask you to contact me by Friday, October
12, 2001 if you are NOT.

We look forward to seeing you in California.

Regards,

Betty J. Thompson
Conference Coordinator