i am just kidding.  i wouldn't ever pay for it.  anyway i am going with
people from work so it woulnd't look to good if i was bringing hookers into
my room.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	TMS Weekly Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		11/14/2001
Time:		1:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


An extra $200 is just a drop in this bucket.   St. Regis sounds good to me.

	"Linda Hayman" <LHAYMAN@skadden.com>
	05/02/2001 03:04 PM

		 To: <mark.taylor@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: St. Regis cost

I am happy to stay at the St Regis at this price but I am also happy to get a
cheap room near the airport.  The price has gone up quite a bit since the
last time I stayed there.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 12:31:13 -0400
From: "Andrea Williams" <AWILLIAM@skadden.com>
To: <mark.taylor@enron.com>
Cc: "Linda Hayman" <LHAYMAN@skadden.com>
Subject: St. Regis cost
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7
Content-Disposition: inline

Mark ? the cost of the room at St. Regis (Thursday, 5/17/01) for one night is
$286.14 (14.5% tax).  I have booked two separate rooms under Linda's name.
Let me know if there is anything else I can do.

?--Andrea


Attached is a revised draft of the Posting Agreement, along with a blackline
against the version you sent me.  Please call if you want to discuss.  Thanks.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Enron.doc
 - Enronred.rtf


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:53 PM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	10/10/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic

Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic
10/10/0 12:43 (New York)

Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic

     Madrid, Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Union Electrica Fenosa SA,
Spain's third-biggest power company, and Enron Corp., the world's
largest energy trader, will invest together in the Dominican
Republic, kicking off the alliance by building a $550 million
power plant and re-gasification facility.
     The partners will build a natural-gas-fired power station
whose 500-megawatt capacity will represent 30 percent of the
country's current electricity demand, said Fenosa in a note,
confirmed with the company.
     The generator will run on liquefied natural gas when it
starts operating in 2002, switching to fuel from the re-
gasification plant when it starts operating in 2003.
     Fenosa has had an alliance with International Power Plc,
formerly National Power Plc, since 1998. That alliance focuses on
Europe, the U.S. and Australia, a Fenosa spokeswoman said today.
     Enron was the first U.S. utility to receive licenses to buy,
sell and import electricity in Spain, after the government started
opening energy markets to competition in 1998. It's also licensed
to market natural gas.
     The Texas-based utility is building a gas-fired power plant
in southern Spain, has a wind turbine factory near Toledo, and
plans another windmill factory in Catalonia.

--Brooke Nelson in the Madrid bureau (34 91) 700-9600 or
b.nelson@bloomberg.net   /ph

Story illustration: UNF SM <Equity> COMP D to chart Fenosa's
performance against the IBEX index.

TOP NRG

DJ Union Fenosa/Enron -2: Construction To Begin 2001 >E.FEN
10/10/0 12:40 (New York)

  MADRID (Dow Jones)--Spanish electricity company Union Electrica Fenosa SA
(E.FEN) said late Tuesday it has reached an agreement with U.S. energy company
Enron (ENE) to invest in energy infrastructure projects in the Dominican
Republic.
  In a release, Fenosa said the deal involves the construction of a
combined-cycle power plant with a 500MW potency, which will use natural gas
from a regasification plant on the island nation.
  The 500MW potency is equivalent to 30% of the Caribbean island's electricity
demand.
  The deal also includes a complimentary project, Fenosa said. This is the
construction of a regasification plant on the republic's coastline, with a
capacity for treating gas equivalent to the consumption of various groups of
combined-cycle plants with a potency of 1300MW.
  The investment for these two projects is seen at around $550 million, of
which $100 million could come from Dominican companies, Fenosa said.
  Fenosa and Enron estimate that construction of the two projects will begin
in
early 2001, with the power plant coming online in 2002. It will operate with
combustible liquid until 2003, at which time the regasification plant comes
online.

  (MORE) DOW JONES NEWS  10-10-00
  12:40 PM- - 12 40 PM EDT 10-10-00


October 11th 2000.

From : Vivek Menezes

To : Mr. Kenneth L. Lay (klay@enron.com)

Chairman & CEO,

Enron Corp.

Dear Mr. Lay,

Further to my emails dated 22/2/2000 & 14/6/2000 introducing Tata Housing  as
a premium real estate developer in India, and specifically, our commercial
complex Technopolis KnowledgePark at Andheri (E), Mumbai. We have been given
to  understand that Enron have acquired an additional space in Kamla Mills
Compound.  We were surprised to note that Enron did not consider Technopolis
KnowledgePark  inspite of it being a ready to move in building with all the
facilities required  for a good Call Center.

A few of these facilities being -

?High speed (100 MBPS) data network with switched interconnection  between
offices.
?Provision for ISDN lines.
?5000 line MTNL exchange on campus
?Power from Tata Electric Cos, which is 20% cheaper than the  Government
supply.
?In addition, a good quality restaurant and 24 hours ATM  facility.
?Central Air-conditioning & Building Automation System.

All these facilities and more were explained to Mr. Edward de Valcourt,
Project Director Communications, Enron Corp., when he visited Technopolis
KnowledgePark on 16/6/2000. Inspite of that, we have once again not been
considered. I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that we
currently have approximately 1,00,000 sq.ft. of space available at
Technopolis  KnowledgePark. We are also in the process of constructing the
IInd Phase in the  same complex which is approximately 60,000 sq.ft. and can
be made entirely  available to you, if required.

Further, we have another building of approximately 1,00,000 sq.ft. located
strategically at Kanjurmarg. This too could be ideal for your requirement.
We  would also like to inform you that Tata Housing has a large land bank and
can  offer properties to Enron for Call Centres across the country.

We request you to once again look into the same and revert to us at the
earliest.

Thanking you

Yours sincerely,

TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.

Vivek Menezes

Manager ) Marketing & Sales

cc : Mr. Sanjay Bhatnagar ) CEO

??? : Mr. Wade Cline ) COO

??? : Mr. P. Sreekumar

??? : Mr. Hemant Luthra

??? : Mr. Edward de Valcourt)emailed  at(Edward.de.Valcourt@enron.com)

????? Enron India Pvt. Ltd.

56, Maker Chambers VI

Nariman Point

Mumbai ) 400 021.


I don't have copies of the assignment docs in my files. Can you see if somebody in Legal or Global Contracts could forward me a copy?

Thanks,
Darren

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:43 PM
To:	Vanek, Darren
Cc:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	RE:

Darren:
Cannon and Kinder Morgan are both in agreement to the assignment.  Do you have a recommendation of what Credit would like the assignment to look like?  Is the one that was used on the first deal OK?  Please let me know so that we can get this going again.

	Thanks,
	Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Sunday, September 09, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	RE:

Jim,
We need to get Cannon and Kinder to agree to the assignment, so the transactions can happen simultaneously. Credit is not comfortable wearing the risk with Cannon for any length of time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Vanek, Darren
Subject:	RE:

The Kinder Morgan assignment could also be put in place with this deal.  Kinder Morgan & Cannon Interest have there own deal and Kinder Morgan has been pretty flexible in the past, so I do not think it would be a problem.  I would like to go forward with this deal quickly to avoid having the Market move against this transaction.  Please get back with as soon as you can.
	Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:57 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Cc:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:

Jim,
Sorry about the delay in correspondence, but we have been reviewing the history of the previous transactions. It appears that the deal was eventually assigneed to Kinder Morgan.  We should pursue the deal with Kinder. We would greatly appreciate any information that you might have about the Kinder assignment as well as your thoughts about pursuing the deal directly with Kinder.

-Darren

From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:39 AM
To:	Rohauer, Tanya; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Cannon Interest Houston Synthetic Storage Transaction
Importance:	High

Tanya,
Quick background: Jim Schwieger brought me this deal last week at the request of Tom Martin. It appears as though HPL did 2 similar transactions similar to this in past.  The information that we have on Cannon contains the following additonal information inCAS:
	Cannon Interests Houston is a dba for Patrick Locke (a person). No financial trading.  All financial trading 	should be allocated to an affiliate, Westpark 	Resources, Inc. executed ISDA.

	We are holding $900,000. as prepayment of the $.21/mmbtu premium due to amortize 11/00 - 2/01.  Amount 	will be applied to third party sales account 	(4830-999) and allowed to flow through profit/loss.  Remaining 	portion will settle normally 11/00 - 2/00 without the $.21 premium.  Movement of the the $900,00 will take 	place during 4/00 accounting.

I believe that these comments are in relation to the HPL deals and are outdated. In addition, I believe that ENA recently purchased capacity from Cannon, which is reflected in a current annuity due to Cannon. According to notes in TAGG, Barry Tycholiz was the commercial person involved in the capacity transaction.

The new transaction mirrors the old one with a change of time period and pricing:
ENA takes delivery of 2.5bcf/per month @ Houston Ship Channel Index
June 2005 -Oct 2005
June 2006- Oct 2006
June 2007- Oct 2007
June 2008- Oct 2008
Cannon takes delivery of the same quantity @ Houston Ship Channel Index weighted average price for the volume + $0.30
November 2005- Feb 2006
November 2006- Feb 2007
November 2007- Feb 2008
November 2008- Feb 2009

Points of note:
 Original transaction began with HPL taking delivery in June 2000 going through Feb 2003 and later extended through  Feb 2005.
Cannon was required to pay $900,000 March 2000 (storage fee?) and to post a $4.2MM Letter of Credit for the term of the deal.
In addition, Cannon was required to post subsequent Letters of Credit "in the amount of 5,083,333 times the weighted average price determined....."
The quantities are the same as the original transaction, but I do not think that there will be an upfront payment for storage services.

-Darren


Matt,

Here are a couple of links that might be helpful for planning your ski trip.
  Could you also please forward this email on to Ted.  I forgot to copy him
on my email last time that gave my forwarding info and I don't recall his
last name.  He is planning to be in park city with some friends this winter
and wanted to get in touch w/ me.
Let me know if you have any questions regarding park city.  I think the
parkcity info website has some info on Sundance, you just have to dig
through there to find it.
Take care,
Mo

http://www.deervalley.com/winter/winterhome.asp
http://www.resortswest.com/Winter/wdeer.htm
http://www.parkcityinfo.com/
http://www.parkcity2002.org/
http://www.thecanyons.com/home.html

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Rakesh,

To confirm our conversation:

Please, go ahead and buy a copy.

Vince

Rakesh Bharati@ENRON
03/29/2001 02:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Vince,

Tanya and I feel that there is a need for a constrained optimization routine
for our VAR related research.   Numerical recipes does not contain
subroutines where equality and inequality contraints can be easily
incorporated.  Also, the number of arguments that can be handled is also
limited.

IMSL provides a comprehensive library of more than 300 C/C++  statistical and
mathematical analysis functions.  We think that it would be of great value to
our efforts and to the efforts of our research group.  Presently the cost is
aproximately around $1500 and Mike Bothwell (Visual Numerics Rep) assures us
as the version is not license protected, we all can use it as long as
simultaneous usage is within the license.

Please let me know if you should need further information.

Thanks,

Rakesh

---------------------- Forwarded by Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Mike Bothwell <mbothwell@houston.vni.com> on 03/29/2001 12:56:03 PM
To: "'Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com'" <Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Rakesh, I'm just following up to see how things looked on this.  Any change
in status?  Let me know I can furhter help you.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor

Rakesh,

As we discussed, the CNL 4.0 PC libraries are not license managed.  Version
5 will be.  The PC Version 4.0 can be installed on a network drive and
called from networked PCs.  As expected, we would ask that Enron honor the
license agreement by allowing only the number of simultaneous uses permitted
by the license.  Version 5.0 will be license managed and can be licensed as
node locked or floating.

With regard to Unix licensing, the current version of CNL for Unix is
license managed.  It can be licensed as node locked or floating.  If you
install the libraries on a Unix server as node locked, the number of
simultaneous sessions on that server is not limited except by the
capabilities of the machine.  A floating Unix license would be checked out
by the individual user to be executed on a local machine.

Also as mentioned, your investment is protected by allowing you to upgrade
in the future by paying only the price difference between your current and
desired platforms.  This upgrade option only applies to licenses covered
under support.

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.  I look forward to
providing you the best math and statistical libraries available today to
help you solve your problems and understand your data.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
12:17 PM ---------------------------

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
11/15/2000 12:06 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Valero 10/00

I noticed the new October deals for Valero (414065, 414074, 414071) include
both the base Index pricing and the swing Gas Daily pricing.  However, the
old swing deals (148386, 148391, 148382) are still valid through October.
Should these deals be effective for October?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca


The following items were discussed in this week's ETS and Corporate Change Control Item...

Oct. 21
From 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., the Unix team will perform maintenance and reboot app server emerald.  The following applications will be affected:  CAS, ERP/TRV, IZZIE, SIEBEL, WEBMODAL, Commodity Logic.  No impact to ETS users is expected.

Oct. 27
From 4:00 - 8:00 p.m., Trizechan Properties has scheduled a shutdown of all electrical service at 3 Allen Center.  Enron Network Services will power down the 3AC network infrastructure between 3:30-4:00.  There will be no network access during the electrical maintenance and the outage will continue until ENS is able to power up all of the networking devices.  If you need access to 3AC anytime that Saturday, you will need to contact Trizechan Properties beforehand with your security information.  Anyone to attempts to enter the building on Saturday that is not on the list will be denied access.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


The e-mail references a memo previously prepared by Antonio Felix.  Can you
tell me the date of that memo?  I only have two (2) Tozzini memos (12/26/97
and 2/20/98).  Thanks.  Sara

Michael Guerriero@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

08/20/99 07:45 AM

To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Gustavo Junqueira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Don Black has suggested we get you in the loop on the below issues we are
seeking answers on. We have some pending financial transactions that we would
like to work through all the Brazilian mechanics before proceeding. Your
primary contact down here for this issue will be Maria Ines Granado. Please
provide us with your comments as soon as possible so that we do not encounter
a transactional conflict.

Gustavo thank you for all your work to date we will keep you briefed to make
sure we have your input. Please follow up on the Tozzini issue we discussed
to make a final decision on their input.

Thanks
MFG

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/20/99 09:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Gustavo Junqueira                           08/17/99 06:19 PM

To: afac@tfts.tozzini.com.br
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Porter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David S
Reinfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Antonio Felix,

As Enron is finding several opportunities involving financial derivatives in
Brazil, we would like to get from Tozzini Freire Law Firm a summarized but
concise read on the "cans and cannots" of these type of transactions in
Brazil. Here is my understanding of the regulations from the memo you have
already sent to us regarding swaps and prepays as well as a list of the most
common examples of deals that Enron would be encountering in the marketplace.
I would appreciate if you could comment on what is written here and also add
further information so Enron can have some sort of menu of deals of this
nature that can be pursued. I would like to ask you to add your comment in
this same message to make the review process a little easier. Thank you
inadvance for your attention.

Swaps (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

OTC Swaps

The Central Bank regulates swap transactions involving local financial
institutions acting either as dealers for their own account or as
intermediaries to the contracting parties. When the financial institutions
act as intermediaries, the agreements are in fact private agreements
negotiated by two non-financial companies, but become subject to the
requirements and regulations normally applicable to swaps involving financial
institutions. According to regulations currently in force, such swaps can
relate to exchange rates, interest rates, gold and price indices.

All of the swap agreements involving financial institutions must be
registered with CETIP or with another custody and clearing system authorized
by the Central Bank or the CVM (Brazilian SEC). As a matter of practice, the
agreements used by the banks that participate in the swap market do not
follow a standard form, since normally each bank has a particular sample form
with which it feels more comfortable.

Derivatives
In addition to exchange-traded derivatives and OTC swaps involving financial
institutions, there is no legal impediment, in principle, to derivatives
transactions being privately negotiated and entered into between two
interested parties. As a general rule in Brazil, as long as no specific
prohibition is found in the law, parties are free to negotiate agreements
that best suit their interests.

International Hedge
Central Bank regulations authorize that Brazilian companies enter into
transactions abroad, either in exchanges or having a financial institution as
their counterpart, to hedge against the fluctuation of interest rates,
exchange rates or commodity prices in the international markets.

Such hedge transactions must refer to payments in foreign currency scheduled
to be made by or to the Brazilian company in respect of commercial or
financial rights or obligations, or to payments in local currency arising out
of certain financial obligations subject to the variation of exchange rates
and payments relating to imports, exports or local transactions involving
commodities priced according to their valuation in foreign exchanges. The
commercial market exchange rates are applicable to foreign exchange
agreements referring to remittances of currency in connection with hedge
transactions.

When the underlying obligation/right is registered with the Central Bank, the
corresponding hedge transaction must be informed to the Central Bank within
10 days of its execution. When there is no registration with the Central
Bank, the banks executing the foreign exchange agreements relating to the
hedge transaction must verify the existence of the obligation/right being
hedged.

Examples

Commodity swap between two Brazilian companies:
As per what has been said above, there is nothing that precludes Enron Brazil
of entering into a swap with another Brazilian company regarding any
commodity traded by Enron (Pulp, Paper, Petrochem products, Power, Gas).
Enron does not need to be a financial institutions to provide swaps
transactions. On the other hand, I am not sure yet on the following points:
(1) Does such swap agreement should be registered with CETIP or any other
clearing system to be valid under Brazilian regulations? (2) What are the
taxes involved in a swap?

Commodity swap between a Brazilian company and an offshore company:
This kind of deal seems to be also available in the Brazilian market and the
only difference from example 1 would be the fact that it must be registered
with the Central Bank and it would involved transfer of foreign currency.

Commodity swap between two offshore companies but involving Brazilian exports:
I am not sure if Brazilian regulations would have anything to do with a
transaction like this one. I would assume that a Brazilian exporter would
sell to their offshore subsidiary and such subsidiary would sell to their end
customer. Enron would step in and offer a swap agreement for the offshore
subsidiary of the Brazilian company therefore Enron would not have any
involvement with Brazilian regulations because it would not be dealing with
Brazil.

Prepays (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

The regulations currently in force governing export prepayments, especially
Central Bank of Brazil's Carta-Circular 2624, of February 14, 1996, establish
that all repayments of principal under such transactions must necessarily be
made by means of shipments of the relevant exported goods.  Carta-Circular
2624 allows cash remittances abroad only in regard to payments of interest
under the facility.  Therefore, it is not possible to structure a transaction
where the repayment of principal will be made only in cash or where the
borrower has the ability to choose between paying cash or exporting the goods.

A transaction that involves structuring a direct loan to the Brazilian
company where the value of the principal of which would be tied to the price
of the relevant commodity is very difficult to be approved.  Under a direct
loan registered with the Central Bank the borrower may remit all due amounts
of principal and interest in accordance with the schedule of payments
attached to the certificate of registration. The problem with such
alternative is that, although there are no express regulations preventing it
to do so, the Central Bank will most probably not issue a prior authorization
for such type of loan, as it only normally issues authorizations for normal
loans where the principal is a fixed amount and the interest rate is either a
fixed rate or a floating rate (normally based on LIBOR or US Treasury).  It
should also be noted that generally speaking all interest payments under such
an agreement are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% p.a.

CC 5 Account

A possible alternative way to structure a prepay would be by using a
non-registered loan with the Central Bank.  Under such alternative, the funds
disbursed by Enron under the loan would be remitted to Brazil through an
international transfer of Brazilian currency, as allowed by Circular 2677 of
the Central Bank of Brazil. The international transfer of Brazilian currency
("International Transfer") is a system which uses a non-resident current
account in Brazil and the Brazilian interbank foreign exchange market to
effect remittances of funds to and from Brazil.  Under such system, a lender
that wishes to disburse funds to a Brazilian borrower makes a foreign
currency deposit with a bank located outside of Brazil ("offshore bank")  and
instructs the offshore bank to deliver such dollars to a Brazilian bank in
exchange for Brazilian currency.  Such Brazilian currency is then deposited
in a non-resident account held by the offshore bank in Brazil and thereafter
transferred to the borrower. The repayments follow the inverse procedure,
i.e. the borrower deposits the amount in a non-resident account of an
offshore bank and instructs it to exchange the funds into foreign currency
and deliver them to the lender abroad.

The main differences between the registered loans and the non-registered
loans are that the non-registered loans are not subject to prior approval by
the Central Bank of Brazil (and therefore not subject to scrutiny as to their
minimum tenors and applicable interest rates) and the applicable foreign
exchange rate to non-registered loans is the floating rate (as opposed to the
commercial rate of exchange). All transfers of funds to Brazil as
International Transfers are subject to a Financial Transactions Tax ("IOF")
at the rate of 2% on the amount transferred, plus a bank fee that normally
ranges from 0.4% to 0.6% of such amount.  Any interest payments under a
non-registered loan are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% (or 25%
if the lender is located in a tax-haven jurisdiction).

I don't think this type of transaction is the best way to circumvent some of
the Brazilian regulations regarding prepayment given the bad press that deals
via the CC 5 Account mechanism would bring to Enron but I have it addressed
just in case someone does not share the same opinion.

Examples

Financial prepay between two Brazilian companies
Not allowed unless the company providing the prepay qualifies as a financial
institution as per Brazilian law. Since it will not be the case in Enron's
cases, we should not focus in these kind of transactions.

Financial prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
As it has been mentioned before it is allowed as long as Enron can structure
the prepay in way where there is a pre-established amortization schedule for
principal and interest. It is very hard to structure a prepay with specific
split between principal and interest because the objective of the prepay is
to lock on a certain volume of a product and not on a specific price.
Therefore, if Enron prepays for a specific product on a floating basis the
attached value of that commodity can go up or down as the market fluctuates
as well as the total value associate to the deal. Such value can be either
principal or interest and it is impossible to determine what it will be.

Financial prepay between two offshore companies but one being a subsidiary of
a Brazilian entity
I think there is no restrictions in this case given the whole deal will be
closed offshore and the Brazilian authorities are not going to be involved.
It will most likely be a deal involving three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Physical prepay between two Brazilian companies
No restrictions.

Physical prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
No restrictions as long as there is physical deliveries.

Physical prepay between two offshore companies but  involving Brazilian
exports
No restrictions. It would also involve three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Thanks,

Gustavo


Please format the text files to be processed through GRMS in the following
manner.

1) Sort by book id, then by master deal id, then by reference date.
2) The dates must be in the following format.  4-Mar-97
3) The book names must be the same every day.
4) If the cell should contain a number please put a zero if there is no
value.  GRMS will not recognize a N/A in a field that is supposed to contain
a number.
5) Please name the files in a manner consistent with those below.

If you have any questions feel free to give me a call.

Thanks,
Robin


The following servers will be coming down, please click on the icon for more
details and scheduled times :

PR1 (Apollo Production) and PR2 (HR Production) Servers will be DOWN

WHEN: 06.00PM (CST) Friday 12-15-2000  TO: 03.00PM (CST) Sunday 12-17-2000

There are three business reasons for this extended outage:

(1) Production Build activities associated with recent Enron expansion and
acquisitions
(2) Enhanced functionality
(3) System maintenance

What does this mean to our customers?

We do not expect your normal activities within the system will be affected.
However, in the unlikely event that you come across an unexpected result,
please contact the ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.

Thank you.


Can we set this up for next Tuesday morning?

Thanks,

Eric
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000 03:40 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           01/07/2000 03:34 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reminder: December Earnings meetings

Would you please set this up with them?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
03:33 PM ---------------------------

Sean Kiehne@ENRON
01/07/2000 10:51 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Stevenson/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Roest/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reminder: December Earnings meetings

A reminder that we would like to meet with each of the regional desks to
discuss December earnings.  If possible, we would like to meet Mon. or Tues.
of next week (Jan. 10).

Please call with any questions.

Thank You,

Sean
3 3928


Please see attached letter, same subject -- signed, hard copy to follow.

 <<SRP Change.doc>>

 - SRP Change In Scheduling Practices_.doc


See attached WSJ article, particularly the last paragraph.  The message is:
there has not been enough deregulation;  the government is still very much in
the way.  California is a perfect example:  the market has responded to
demand increases with thousands of megawatts of new generation, but state and
local officials have not sited them, and companies like Enron are offering
price protection, but utilities are not allowed to take advantage.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/14/2000 10:38
AM ---------------------------

Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/14/2000 08:32 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul Kaufman@ECT,
Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D Steffes@EES,
Steven J Kean@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie
Mandelker@ECT, filuntz@aol.com
cc:
Subject: California Power Issue

Attached is an article about deregulation, price volatility, California power
issues and how EES and other energy management type of companies are helping
with solve these problems.

Attached is an article about how PG&E is offering incentives to its larger
customers in California that which asks them to use less energy, in turn the
customers are guaranteed to be blackout free. There is a little controversy
over this issue because the incentive is not offered to small business or
residents.


At some point very soon, we need to talk about how the whole range of
contacts that need to be made in D.C. will be made- Hillings does not know
about the deal as far as I know. Let's talk before the end of the week.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/03/2000
07:22 AM ---------------------------

Dennis Vegas@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/02/2000 07:54 PM
To: Daniel Castagnola/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard Shapiro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Key Contacts in IFIs and OPIC

Because this whole issue is important to of our projects -Gaza, Guatemala, I
wanted you to have an idea of the strategies being considered. Nothing is
definitive, they want to lay our the risks and approaches necessary to
protect all projects and relationships. If you have any thoughts concerning
the approach, let me know! I will keep you posted as things unfold.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/02/2000 07:41 PM ---------------------------

Keith Miceli@ENRON
08/02/2000 05:26 PM
To: Steven J Kean@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen.Denne@enron.com,
Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Johan
Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Henry.Means@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Key Contacts in IFIs and OPIC

FYI.  Keith
---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron on 08/02/2000
06:24 PM ---------------------------
From: John Hardy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/02/2000 05:01 PM
To: Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bill Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Key Contacts in IFIs and OPIC

Keith
 Following on our conversation, let me propose a couple of guiding factors in
terms of a communications strategy for summer for Washington.  The overriding
consideration should be to give OPIC operating flexibility to work with us in
accomplishing our financing objectives without a lot of scrutiny from others
around Washington that might be interested in getting political benefit from
putting OPIC's political management on the hot seat.  We will be meeting with
OPIC shortly after the announcement to set out the reasons why nothing much
has changed. Our objective I think around Washington should be to quietly
inform our friends and other critical players so that no one is surprised by
learning of the shift and no one considers it to be a big deal.  So I would
propose that after meeting with OPIC we make the rounds and talk to our
contacts at State, DOE, Treasury, the Executive Directors at the World Bank
and the IDB, EXIM and the other agencies as well as the appropriate staffers
on the Hill that might have cause to comment on OPIC's decisions.  In each
case we should be laying out the arguments why this transaction makes sense
and why in the end nothing much has changed.  Hope this helps.  Thanks John

Keith Miceli@ENRON
08/02/2000 03:06 PM
To: John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Key Contacts in IFIs and OPIC

John:  I understand that you are in the know about Summer.  Therefore, could
I prevail on you to provide me with a list of the names and titles of those
from the aforementioned groups who we should consider sending a letter to
inform them of the transaction.  I assume it would be the U.S. Executive
Director, of World Bank and IDB, plus OPIC President.  You know better than
me, so I'll stand by.  Your input will be included in a workbook we are
developing for a major communications rollout plan--both internal and
external. Thanks, Keith


Oxley says for me to keep my word..we need Whalley's or Frevert's approval ..do you get it or do I? Need go ahead ASAP!
--------------------------
Rick S.


Hey Guz- how's it going? I hear you took that job where you are working
those funky hours. I thought you would appreciate this little story about
the ant and the grasshopper!!! Remember to vote!!! Later, Jeff

>From: Nathan Bennett DNET <NBennett@deltanet.net>
>To: "'Jennifer Yax'" <jay@severson.com>,        "'jfbosu@hotmail.com'"
><jfbosu@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Remember to Vote
>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:01:03 -0700
>
>My dad sent this to me.  I think you will enjoy this.
>
>Subject: FW: Rember to Vote
>
>
>Ant it the truth!
>
> > Subject: FW: Remember to VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > A story you must read!
> >
> > THE CLASSIC VERSION -
> >
> > The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his
> > house and laying up supplies for the winter.  The Grasshopper thinks
>he's
> > a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.  Come winter,
>the
> > ant is warm and well fed.  The grasshopper has no food or shelter so he
> > dies out in the cold.
> >
> > THE MODERN VERSION -
> >
> > The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his
> > house and laying up supplies for the winter.  The Grasshopper thinks
>he's
> > a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.  Come winter,
>the
> > shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why
>the
> > ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and
> > starving.  CBS, NBC and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering
> > grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a
> > table filled with food. "America" is stunned by the sharp contrast.  How
> > can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is
> > allowed to suffer so?
> >
> > Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody
>cries
> > when they sing "It's Not Easy Being Green."
> >
> > Bill and Hillary Clinton make a special guest appearance on the CBS
> > Evening News to tell a concerned Dan Rather that they will do everything
> > they can for the grasshopper who has been denied the prosperity he
> > deserves by those who benefited unfairly during the Reagan summers, or
>as
> > Bill refers to it as "temperatures of the 80's."
> >
> > Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where
>the
> > news stations film the group singing "We shall overcome".  Jesse then
>has
> > the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake.
> >
> > Al Gore exclaims in an interview with Peter Jennings that the ant has
> > gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and calls for an immediate
> > tax hike on the ant to make him pay his "fair share".
> >
> > Finally, the EEOC drafts the "Economic Equity and Anti-Ant Act",
> > retroactive to the beginning of the summer.  The ant is fined for
>failing
> > to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to
> > pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.
> > Hillary gets her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a
>Defamation
> > suit against the ant.  The case is tried before a panel of federal
>judges
> > that Bill appointed from a list of single-parent welfare recipients who
> > can only hear cases on Thursday's between 1:30 and 3:00 PM when there
>are
> > no talk shows scheduled.  The ant loses the case.
> >
> > The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of
>the
> > ant's food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be
> > the ant's old house, crumbles around him since he doesn't maintain it.
> > The ant has disappeared in the snow.  And on the TV, which the
>grasshopper
> > bought by selling most of the ant's food, they are showing Bill Clinton
> > standing before a wildly applauding group of Democrats announcing that a
> > new era of "fairness" has dawned in America.  The grasshopper is found
> > dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken
> > over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.
> >
> > Remember to Vote

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Hello,

I am applying for the credit analyst position placed on the monster.com.

Please find my resume attached.

Sincerely,
Monika Causholli


testing


yes, still on for dinner. 7:30pm is ok for me.  let know where and when.  I
look forward to seeing you and Scott.

Steve Pearlman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
06/20/2000 10:39 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dinner

Scott,

Are we on for dinner?  I invited Scott Porter to join us - hope that is okay
with you.  Any time from about 7:30 on is okay for me, but I would prefer
later rather than earlier, because I have to run a few errands out in the
direction of the Galeria after work.  Let me know.

Steve


The appointment with the pediatrician is at 1100.  I catch up with you later
today.

Kay


Mark:
Here is a first cut at where things stand on projects that I am handling.  I
will continue to update it as long as I am here, but thought you should have
it just in case.  All of these files are on top of the file cabinets near the
window.

  Carol


PG&E GT-NW Plans Lateral Across Washington State
PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest (GTN) said it received market requests for about three times the capacity on a proposed lateral that would cross Washington and compete with Northwest Pipeline for rapidly expanding power generation markets in the western half of the state along the I-5 highway corridor. GTN closed its open season for the Washington Lateral Project June 22. It was the third open season for a GTN pipeline expansion this year. Meanwhile Northwest Pipeline has four expansions of its own planned for the region.
"The level of customer interest we received demonstrates the increasing demand for gas in Washington State," said Peter Lund, vice president of the PG&E National Energy Group, which includes GTN. Lund said GTN envisions a pipeline capable of transporting 300,000 to 400,000 Dth/d of gas. GTN said it received expressions of interest from local distributors and power generators.
The lateral would begin at GTN south of Spokane and head west to the Mid-Columbia area in central Washington, across the Cascades to the I-5 corridor in western Washington, which is served currently by only Northwest Pipeline. The ultimate route for the project has not been determined, and exact delivery points will be determined as the pipeline works out agreements with customers, the company said. "I want you to know that Mount Rainier is in the middle of the route area we are looking at but we will not be going over Mount Rainier because it's a national park; there's no way we are going to do that," said a GTN spokeswoman. "We're basically going to go from east to west over the mountains to I-5."
The pipeline companies in the Pacific Northwest have worked themselves into an expansion frenzy with two large mainline expansions and this new state-crossing lateral planned by GTN and four large laterals, including a new line to Vancouver Island, planned by Williams' Northwest Pipeline.  The power crisis has been the primary driver. Up until the last few decades, the region has relied on hydroelectricity and wood for its power generation, but now it is turning to natural gas.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Charles A - HR
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:	RE: Orgination Candidates

We are targeting the 14th of July.  More news to come.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Davies, Neil; Taylor, Charles A - HR
Subject:	RE: Orgination Candidates

Neil/Charles,

Update please?

Incidentally, Lavo vetoed EGM's involvement.

David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:	Re: Orgination Candidates

What date is it?

From:	David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/14/2001 04:58 PM
To:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Neil Davies/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Melodick/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Orgination Candidates

Chaps,

The team have identified 17 Manager and Director level Commercial candidates which we are looking to bring in for a super-saturday type event primarily for Duran's area. We'll refine list and may see some fall out before the (yet to be arranged) day.

It seems some of these guys may be of interest to EGM as well. Unless you have a huge problem the plan would be to invite Per Sekse and maybe someone from Nowlan's area to join the panel. Maybe they will want one or two that we don't.

Do you want to interview?

David


much grass

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 04:11 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Blue Dog

Marisa has the Cert of Incumbency and signature page (3 originals) of the
Escrow Agreement.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


Vance, I've been attempting to call you .  Your voicemail is full and my
return voicemail keeps getting rejected.  I suggest you clear out some room.
I would be happy to change my schedule and meet either at 12 or 12:30.  I
don't really want an hour with him but will do what you need.
mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 04:35 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           12/06/2000 01:24 PM

To: abraham5@flash.net, bgacg@flash.net
cc:
Subject: Excel Calendar

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 01:22 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           12/05/2000 02:54 PM

To: bgacg@flash.net
cc:
Subject:

Bonnie -

I have tried to send this to you at your general email address but it keeps
being returned to me so I'm trying this email address.


FULL NATIONAL Asset & Background Searches

Just call us Toll Free at (888) 729-8976 and PROTECT YOURSELF

AmericaFind Inc.

24 hour OR LESS Turn Around Time.

Just call us Toll Free at (888) 729-8976 and PROTECT YOURSELF

What do you Really Know about your Employee?
What do you Really Know about your Lover?
What do you Really Know about your Baby Sitter?
What do you Really Know about your Business Associate?

You NEED to protect yourself! You NEED to know the TRUTH!

WE CHECK PEOPLE OUT FOR YOU!!!

Just call us Toll Free at (888) 729-8976 and PROTECT YOURSELF

In 24 hours OR LESS we can tell you everything to allow you to make an informed decision!!

*All Real Estate owned in past 15 years, *All Corporations & DBA's, *STATE AND FEDERAL Civil Judgments,
*Bankruptcies and Liens covering past 15 years.!! *All State and Federal Misdemeanor
and Felony Criminal Convictions.!! *Much more!

Do NOT go uninformed. Let AmericaFind Inc. Tell you the TRUTH!

REMEMBER..WE CHECK PEOPLE OUT FOR YOU!!

Just call us Toll Free at (888) 729-8976 and PROTECT YOURSELF.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AS A COURTESY, IF YOU WOULD LIKE
To be removed from further mailings send an email from the
address you want removed to mailto:removeme@iraqmail.com?subject=Remove


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
01:57 PM ---------------------------

"the shockwave.com team" <shockwave.com@shockwave.m0.net> on 06/23/2000
10:49:22 PM
Please respond to shockwave.com@shockwave.m0.net
To: pallen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Download Frogger before it hops away!

Dear Phillip,

Frogger is leaving shockwave.com soon...

Save it to your Shockmachine now!

Every frog has his day - games, too. Frogger had a great run as an
arcade classic, but it is leaving the shockwave.com pond soon. The
good news is that you can download it to your Shockmachine and
own it forever!

Don't know about Shockmachine? You can download Shockmachine for free
and save all of your downloadable favorites to play off-line,
full-screen, whenever you want.

Download Frogger by noon, PST on June 30th, while it's still on
the site!

the shockwave.com team

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unsubscribe Instructions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sure you want to unsubscribe and stop receiving E-mail from us? All
right... click here:
http://shockwave1.m0.net/m/u/shk/s.asp?e=pallen%40enron.com

#27279


This request has been pending approval for  2 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081004&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081004
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/15/02 12:45:53 PM
Requested For       : randal.frisbie@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Tuesday, November  20, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, November  19, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $2.3800	          $1.8900	          $2.0225	+    .4136	         293,000	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $2.4700	          $1.8700	          $2.1529	+    .5234	         270,300	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $2.4600	          $1.9300	          $2.0774	+    .3593	       1,472,500	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $2.3275	          $1.8600	          $1.9720	+    .3835	         238,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $2.3400	          $1.8150	          $2.0306	+    .4295	         422,700	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $2.3300	          $1.8150	          $2.0073	+    .4024	         251,300	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $2.5200	          $1.8550	          $2.1374	+    .4885	         248,500	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $2.4800	          $1.8200	          $1.9198	+    .3116	         244,200	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $2.5000	          $1.9650	          $2.1221	+    .3847	         244,600	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $2.4500	          $1.8200	          $1.9795	+    .4371	         103,300	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $2.4700	          $1.8800	          $2.0918	+    .4279	         328,900	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $2.4300	          $2.0700	          $2.1744	+    .3588	         243,500	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $2.1000	          $1.7150	          $1.7930	+    .4001	         165,400	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.4200	          $1.8950	          $2.0090	+    .3880	         519,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.4500	          $1.8950	          $1.9945	+    .3900	         121,200	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $2.3900	          $1.8100	          $2.0449	+    .5635	         217,200	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $2.5000	          $1.9800	          $2.1417	+    .3887	         605,300	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $3.0000	          $2.0600	          $2.3471	+    .5403	         367,500	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $3.0900	          $2.2100	          $2.5296	+    .5388	         399,000	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.2375	          $2.4100	          $2.6257	+    .6410	         327,600	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $1.7800	          $1.5900	          $1.7077	+    .5433	          83,200	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $1.9300	          $1.7650	          $1.8250	+    .5531	         128,000	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $1.7500	          $1.4900	          $1.5583	+    .3706	         129,800	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $2.0500	          $1.8900	          $1.9756	+    .5850	         287,000	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $1.9500	          $1.8300	          $1.8850	+    .4775	         226,600	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.0900	          $1.6300	          $1.7492	+    .4700	         310,000	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $2.2000	          $1.7500	          $1.8735	+    .5027	         213,800	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Hey sugar, I am here, it is crazy, lots of people moving, we are having to copy over our files and things to UBS directory.  Anyway, I love and miss you.

Talk to you soon.

love

The Puffy Frog Piggy


I always compile a contact list for Energy Operations during the holidays
(Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years).  Just let me know who appropriate
contacts will be, especially for the DPR and MPR, during the dates that you
are out.  Sounds as if you should see a white Christmas!  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 03:53 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 09:26 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: vacation plans

Dear Sally,

I'd like to take vacation from December 15 - 26 to goto Canada.  Please let
me know if this doesn't fit for some reason.

Best regards,

Shona


Lexi,

I would like to volunteer for the Information Session on September 17.  My apologies for not being able to help out with this year's spring recruiting, but from the beginning of October through last Friday I couldn't take a single day off from work.  Fortunately, I'm in a new rotation and they have a bit more flexibility when it comes to my schedule.

Thanks,
Susan
x31455


Due to lack of interest, this meeting is CANCELLED.  You are free to continue
with your activities as planned.

If you are around the resort Thursday afternoon, Mark would be happy to meet
up in one of the bars for an informal get together, but no "official" meeting
scheduled.

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicki Daw/NA/Enron on 15/11/2000 14:22
---------------------------

Mark Frevert
09/11/2000 13:50
Sent by: Nicki Daw
To: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EWS Meeting at Management Conference

Greg and I would like to have an informal meeting of our Wholesale leadership
team when we meet in San Antonio for the annual Management Conference.  If
your schedule permits, we would like to get together at 4pm on Thursday to
talk about the new organization, resources, next year plans, and anything
else you would like to discuss.  Appropriate refreshments will be served.
Hope to see your there.

Mark

  Date:  Thursday, 16th November
  Time:  4pm - 5.30pm
  Venue: Uvalde C
    Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort

  Attendees Philippe Bibi
    Ray Bowen
    Michael Brown
    Dave Delainey
    Mark Frevert
    Jim Hughes
    Louise Kitchen
    John Lavorato
    Mike McConnell
    Rebecca McDonald
    Jeff McMahon
    Jeff Shankman
    John Sherriff
    Greg Whalley


i rsvp
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 08:40
PM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 05:41 PM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Karen
Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal
Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dinner Invitation - April 10, 2001 (For Trading Track)

You are cordially invited to attend cocktails and dinner on April 10, 2001 at
La Colombe d'Or restaurant located at 3410 Montrose Blvd (a map can be found
at www.lacolombedor.com).  Cocktail hour will start at 7:00 pm with dinner to
follow.

Please note:  this dinner is for the Trading Track Program.

Please RSVP to Ted Bland at extension 3-5275 before April 6, 2001.


Pretty funny.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           11/13/2000 10:09 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           11/13/2000 08:43 AM

To: kristi.giron@cfisd.net
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:43 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
11/10/2000 03:52 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Lorenz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 03:52 PM
---------------------------

"Vance, Norman" <NVance@hess.com> on 11/10/2000 03:28:15 PM
To: "Greg Couch (E-mail)" <Greg.Couch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

Friday, November 10, 2000
IN THE NEWS..."Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play,"
The Shreveport Times, by Don Walker

"It's a ballot that perplexed Florida voters but was no match for the wits
of first- and fourth-graders at Stockwell Elementary School in Bossier City.

"Disillusioned and upset by the lingering chaos of this week's presidential
election, fourth-grade teacher Lisa Burns pulled a sample of the
controversial Palm Beach County, Fla., ballot off the Internet on Thursday.
She then put her class of 9- and 10-year-olds to the test.  'I gave them a
ballot and had them take a blue marker to vote for Al Gore and a red marker
to vote for George Bush. Then I had them put their name on the bottom of the
ballot and turn it in.'

"Turns out this election was mere child's play. Not one of the 22 students
present in class Thursday was confused by the ballot. Each one was marked
without error.

"Well, if a fourth-grader could do it, how about a first-grader? Down the
hall in Stacey Robinson's class, the ballot was handed out to 6- and
7-year-olds. Robinson used an overhead projector to point out Gore's name,
then asked the class of 24 students to find his bubble on the punch-card
ballot.

"'It wasn't a vote,' Robinson said. 'I just wanted to experiment to see if
they could find the correct bubble.'

"When the ballots were turned in, 19 of the first-graders marked the correct
bubble for Gore, three picked Buchanan's bubble, one picked Bush's and one
marked the bottom bubble for the 'Natural Law' party.

"'If a first-grader can choose the correct bubble, there's no legitimate
claim. Anyone could have done it,' Robinson said. 'A grown adult who took
any time at all could find it.'

"Still, even in a first-grade classroom, vote tabulations were the subject
of protest and controversy. 'I thought we were voting,' Brady McCoy, 6, of
Haughton grumbled after he was told to find and punch the 'Gore' bubble. 'I
wanted to vote for George Bush!'"


vkaminski@aol.com


More fun on the way!!!  Below is the description for the new US Paraxylene
physical product type.  Should we copy the profiles from another US
petrochemical physical product type???  Please send me your comments.

Thanks!!!

Frank

Comercial is rolling out the following new product for Paraxylene FOB
Physical Forward.

Commodity:  Paraxylene FOB
Currency:  USD
Default UOM:  mt
Country:  USA

Description:

A Transaction with Enron Petrochemicals Company, a division of Enron Liquid
Fuels, Inc., under which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase
Paraxylene with minimum purity 99.70%,  on a FOB basis and at the specified
quantity/tolerance, quality and price. The quantity shall be the volume
submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline. The price shall be the price
submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline multiplied by the quantity.


I know the following goes without saying, but I wanted to highlight a few
specific points relevant to this transaction.

As all of you know, the sale of Brownsville and Caledonia to Cinergy was
recently announced.  As the press release indicated, the terms of the
transaction were not released.  While Allegheny (with the sale of the 2000s)
took the same position in its announcement, the purchase price was
subsequently released to the market (by Allegheny).  Cinergy and Enron both
agreed in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, to not release the price and terms
without the other's consent (i.e. THE PRICE AND TERMS WILL REMAIN
CONFIDENTIAL).

To the extent legally permitted, Cinergy will not release the price as part
of its regulatory filings, and in fact, will redact the price from all of its
filings.  If, through your involvement in this process, you inadvertently
learned the price, you must keep it to yourself.  As we all know, information
moves around this organization very quickly.  With two deals on very similar
assets in the market at once (Allegheny and Cinergy), it only makes sense to
contain the external flow of information.

By the way, both transactions should close March/April 2001.

Thanks for your help in this process, and your co-operation in keeping this
information confidential.

Regards,

Don
3-0492


C4C presents...
The Haas House of Horrors Halloween Ball
sponsored exclusively by Clorox.

The Halloween Ball is tomorrow (Friday, October 27th) and will definitely be
tons of fun.? Wanted to pass on important information regarding the party.?
Don't forget, you can still pick up your tickets tomorrow in the courtyard or
purchase tickets at the door.

1. BUS INFORMATION
The bus will be leaving from Cronk Gate, and is scheduled to leave PROMPTLYat
7:30 pm and 8:30 pm.? The bus will leave without you! You cannot switch bus
times!?  The 7:30 bus will be leaving the Atrium at 12:15 am and the 8:30
will leave at 1:15 am.

2. COSTUMES
Costumes are highly recommended! Dress up and be creative!

3. RAFFLE TICKETS
Raffle tickets are $5 and can be purchased at the door.? Great prizes include
Clorox Prize Pak's, gift certificates (Raleigh's, Triple Rock Brewery, Rick &
Ann's Restaurant and Jimmy Bean's), Microsoft Office 2000, REI Trail Kits,
Haas Computing Credit Vouchers and Alcatel Liquors gift pack.

4. CASH BAR/FOOD
Sorry guys, it is a CASH BAR, NOT open bar, after all it is a fundraiser!
Please remember to eat beforehand.? Food WILL NOT be served.

5. LOCATION/DIRECTIONS
The party is located at the Atrium in San Francisco, 101 California St (on
the corner of California St. and Davis St)

Car:? Take I80 West towards San Francisco; go over the Bay Bridge.? Exit on
Fremont St.? Turn left on Fremont, Fremont becomes Front St.? Turn Right onto
California and Turn right onto Davis St.? Parking is available in the
Embarcadero Garages (located under the Embarcadero Center), entrance is on
Front St.

Bart: Closest stop is Embarcadero St. Station.? One way fare is $2.65 and
don't forget, the last train to leave BART on Friday is at 12:25 am.

Looking forward to seeing everyone tomorrow.? Please feel free to email me
with any questions.

Wendy


> Please note that Section 3.4 of the draft User's Guide contains an
> unintended error.  In paragraph 3 of Section 3.4, in the new language, the
> sentence should read:  "Merely specifying the Deliverable Obligation
> Category (e.g., Bonds or Loans) would be inconsistent with the intent of
> the Notice of Intended Physical Settlement."  The change will be made.
>
Robert Pickel
General Counsel


Attached is a revised list of GCP additional adjustments in Blue,
highlighting the correct name and CP ID of the Counterparty with the name
discrepancy resolved.

Adnan

To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: ClickPaper approvals, 12-7-00 _ GCP Response

GCP adjustments are highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_ENA)

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
12/07/2000 09:00 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 12-7-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for December 7, 2000.


Our comments and proposed edits (using the Comments and Track Changes
features of MSWord) are attached.

>>> "ELAINE E. HUFF" <EHUFF@LLGM.COM> 03/20 4:59 PM >>>
Attached you will find the draft of the Response of the Group to the Motion
for Relief from Stay filed by the Debtor.  As an initial caveat, we have
prepared this as the scrivener for the Group.  Like the rest of the Group, we
have not specifically reviewed the substance of this with our client and we
reserve the right to suggest changes based on our client's comments, as we
expect the rest of the Group will.  In addition, we have the following
comments:

1.  In carefully analyzing the Motion for Relief from Stay as part of
preparing this Response, we became convinced that the Debtor meant that the
preliminary injunction was to remain effective and does not intend to grant
general relief from stay as to the Federal District Court action.  It seems
to us that the Debtor is basically saying by this motion that we should
proceed in front of FERC, but nobody has the prerogative, without seeking
further relief of stay from the court, to proceed outside of FERC to resolve
the charge-back issues.  Accordingly, we did not feel it was appropriate to
address this issue in the response.  The Group may want to consider
approaching Debtor's counsel on this issue.

2.  Technically, by asking the Court to include the Amendment 22 proceeding
as part of the Relief from Stay, we are expanding the relief.  We have tried
to soft sell this issue as was suggested by the Group to suggest that this is
simply a related proceeding that is required to go forward to grant complete
relief as part of the Debtor's motion.  If the Debtor objects to the expanded
relief, the court will likely not grant it because it was not specifically
the subject of the motion.  We probably need to lobby Debtor's counsel to
help get this accomplished without the requirement of filing an additional
motion for relief.

3.  Check Exhibit A to make sure that all parties are listed and the
appropriate counsel is listed.  I am trying to simply list the "bankruptcy"
counsel so that Debtor's counsel knows initially who to contact if there is
any question relative to a party.  We have not intentionally left anybody
off.  If someone is missing, it is inadvertent and we will certainly add them
to the list.

If there are others of your Group who should receive this, please forward it
to the other members of group.

We have set up a conference call at 12:15 E.T. to discuss this matter.  The
dial-in number is 1-800-569-0883.  The confirmation number is 5096040.  If
you have any questions prior to that time you may contact Carl Eklund in New
York at 212/424-8482 or Jim Huemoeller at 303/291-2632.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 - PXResponse2.doc


Tana:

Koch Gateway Pipeline Company Inc. is not approved to trade US power -- not a
current CP and not FERC approved.

Please keep Shari as my back-up for now and make sure she is copied on the
credit approval sheets.  Since I won't be here in the morning, Shari will
handle the EOL response.

Leslie


REMINDER FOR THE TSWG CONFERENCE CALL , WEDNESDAY  @3:30PDT

Call In Number (877) 670-4111  Passcode 246870.

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


Sounds like you want to make a suggestion.  What is it?

Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:

> I'm easy-the menu is fine-you guys can also talk it over at Thanksgiving
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 2:41 PM
>    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>
>    Yes, nothing is set in stone.  I really have not discussed the menu with
>    anybody.  What would you perfer?
>
>    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>
>    > does it matter
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 1:58 PM
>    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >
>    >    Thanks-  Do you like my menu for Christmas?
>    >
>    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >
>    >    > will bring you back some cajun chef at Chistmas
>    >    >
>    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 11:42 AM
>    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >
>    >    >    I like to make my own chili.  I load it up with beans, Sue
>    uses
>    >    pork and
>    >    >    beans(it's O.K.), but I like the beans mom used to use.    I
>    was
>    >    told I
>    >    >    needed
>    >    >    to put a little more kick into my chili, so I figured that I
>    would
>    >    ask
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    best-JOE.
>    >    >
>    >    >    Hey, for Christmas, I will provide the Ham and all the
>    >    >    beer,wine,pop,liquor,
>    >    >    pie,chips , nuts and bread. I will have Amy make some
>    barbacued
>    >    weiners.
>    >    >    I will
>    >    >    need you to make double baked potatoes. I will have Jean bring
>    the
>    >    >    polish
>    >    >    sausage and corn/greenbeans.  I may get some sourerkraut and
>    >    dumplins
>    >    >    from
>    >    >    Stoysich also.  I will tell dad that he can pay for the ham.
>    >    >    I will have Joey bring a relish trey  and some lasagne.( I
>    thought
>    >    it
>    >    >    was
>    >    >    pretty good)
>    >    >    Do we need anything else? We are all off on that day, so we
>    can
>    >    start
>    >    >    the party
>    >    >    as early as 3P.M. or earlier if you think, my guess is that
>    you
>    >    will be
>    >    >    at the
>    >    >    casino that morning. Please advise.
>    >    >
>    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >
>    >    >    > since when do you cook-Ithought Sue did everything
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:14 PM
>    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    I need his recipe. We had a chili cookoff and I made my
>    own
>    >    chili
>    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    came in
>    >    >    >    3rd out of 5 people.  I beat 2 women, but My chili was
>    not
>    >    spicey
>    >    >    >    enough.
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    > Cajun Chef-can only get it here.  Too bad.
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:33 PM
>    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    You mean the stuff you buy or the gas that comes out
>    of
>    >    my
>    >    >    butt
>    >    >    >    after I
>    >    >    >    >    make chili.  Speaking of chili, what does Joe put in
>    his
>    >    to
>    >    >    spice
>    >    >    >    it up.
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    > All the gas stocks getting hammered.  Natural gas
>    is
>    >    >    bursting at
>    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    seams.
>    >    >    >    >    > Your bill should go way down
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>
>    @ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:19 PM
>    >    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    I ordered the pies for our big Thanksgiving day
>    >    feast at
>    >    >    >    Jeanies.
>    >    >    >    >    Wish
>    >    >    >    >    >    you could be there.  Dad is bringing the beer,
>    he
>    >    said
>    >    >    one  12
>    >    >    >    pack
>    >    >    >    >    >    would do, I told him to bring a case, just in
>    case
>    >    >    someone
>    >    >    >    wants
>    >    >    >    >    more
>    >    >    >    >    >    that one can. I know that Joan is not coming to
>    >    dinner.
>    >    >    >    Should we
>    >    >    >    >    >    invite her to Christmas or wait for her to
>    call.
>    >    If
>    >    >    you
>    >    >    >    ever
>    >    >    >    >    talk to
>    >    >    >    >    >    her, you may want to mention that her father is
>    >    still
>    >    >    alive
>    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    lives in
>    >    >    >    >    >    the same house that she was raised in.  I hope
>    she
>    >    comes
>    >    >    for
>    >    >    >    >    Christmas.
>    >    >    >    >    >    If she doesn't, I doubt that I will ever invite
>    to
>    >    >    anything
>    >    >    >    again.
>    >    >    >    >    But
>    >    >    >    >    >    that is that fucking Links "better that
>    everybody
>    >    >    >    else"attitude.
>    >    >    >    >    I
>    >    >    >    >    >    might just turn that sideways and stick it up
>    his
>    >    German
>    >    >    ass.
>    >    >    >    Hey
>    >    >    >    >    our
>    >    >    >    >    >    stock is going up, how bout yours?
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************
>    >    >    >    >    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
>    its
>    >    >    relevant
>    >    >    >    >    affiliate and may contain confidential and
>    privileged
>    >    material
>    >    >    for
>    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review,
>    use,
>    >    >    >    distribution or
>    >    >    >    >    disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
>    are
>    >    not
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    intended
>    >    >    >    >    recipient (or authorized to receive for the
>    recipient),
>    >    please
>    >    >    >    contact
>    >    >    >    >    the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
>    >    >    >    >    enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>    all
>    >    copies
>    >    >    of
>    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
>    are not
>    >    >    intended
>    >    >    >    to be
>    >    >    >    >    an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>    evidence
>    >    a
>    >    >    binding
>    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
>    its
>    >    >    affiliates)
>    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    the intended recipient or any other party, and may
>    not be
>    >    >    relied on
>    >    >    >    by
>    >    >    >    >    anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    >    otherwise.
>    >    >    Thank
>    >    >    >    you.
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************


An update...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/19/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/19/2000 02:04:19 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: karla.hesketh@us.abb.com, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com

Subject: LM 6000 Transformers

Kay,
Below are the prices as well as the ex-work factory dates (ship dates).  As
Ben
and Frank and I discussed last Friday this is what we need the option
extension
to the 30th of June to reflect.  Please give me a call when you can.  We need
to
get this done this PM if at all possible.  Frank and I will both be out of our
offices for the rest of the week and this will get very difficult.

Thanks

MIIKE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O
Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on 06/19/2000 01:58 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Frank Chmiel/StLouis/USTRA/ABB
 image moved   06/16/2000 03:48 PM (Phone: +(314) 679-4702)
 to file:
 pic04072.pcx)

To:   Ben.jacoby@enron.com
cc:   Michael O Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Karla
      Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Dennis
      Bowman/StLouis/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
Subject:  LM 6000 Transformers

Ben,
     This note is based on the information provided to me earlier today by
Mike
Sandridge and confirms what the adjusted values would be for each tarnsformer
type, making the following conditions:

1-The quantity of transformers released under the agreement would be decreased
to 10.
2-The option payments for the ten production slots have been deducted, as
shown
below, along with the remaining net price / each transformer type.
3- Two of the $50,000 non-refundable optional production slot payments  are
cancelled. (LNL 9521-3 and 4)
4- In order to meet the terms of the latest agreement, the contract should be
signed by June 19,2000.  If that is not practical, at a minimum, the 10%
progress payment against the value of the contract would be due for wire
transfer immediately. That value would be 10% of $7,884,600 = $788,460.00.

     Therefore the Equipment Pricing Table is revised as shown below.

|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Table    | Primary        | ABB Neg.       | ABB Data Sheet |
| Item     | Voltage        | Number         | #              |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Quantity / Net Price ($) /     |
  | Each                           |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 1   | 138 to         | FC011400-2C    | HU-Enron-2C    |
| (3       | 13.8-13.8      |                |                |
| winding) | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $610,300.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($768,000-50,000-107,700 =     |
  | $610,300)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 2   | 230 / 115 kV   | FC011400-1C    | HU-Enron-1C    |
| (3       | to             |                |                |
| winding) | 13.8-13.8 KV   |                |                |
|          | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Six (6) @ $834,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($884,000-50,000 =             |
  | $834,000)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 3   | 138 / 13.8 KV  | FC011400-2D-LS | HU-Enron-2D-LS |
| (2       | (84/112/140)   |                | (Low Sound)    |
| winding) |                |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $830,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($858,000+22,000-50,000=       |
  |  $830,000)                     |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|

     The ABB Performance data sheets that match up to the three designs that
will be shown in the contract are also attached herein.----------------------
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2C.doc)  (See attached file:
TecFC011400_1C.doc)
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc)

The revised arrangement for schedules and trigger dates is as follows:
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   ABB   | Trigger  | Delivery  | Number |    MVA    |  High   | Comments  |
|  Item   | Date for |  Date Ex  |   of   |  Rating   |  Side   |           |
|   No.   |  Design  |  Factory  | Windin |           | Voltage |           |
|         |  Issues  |           |   gs   |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-3  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-4  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, | Dec. 15,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-5  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|     LNL |   June   | Dec.      | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-6  | 19,      | 15,2000   |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |   2000   |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    1    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    2    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|

Hope this covers the open issues .
     Regards,
     Frank Chmiel

 - pic04072.pcx
 - TecFC011400_2C.doc
 - TecFC011400_1C.doc
 - TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 03/20/2001
01:52 PM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz
03/20/2001 01:18 PM
To: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tyrell
Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Shippers List - Kern Open Season

This is the list of shippers and the office that is representing them.

Office Company  Capacity Ratio

ECC Petro-Canada Package 2 .25
ECC Hunt Oil  Package 2  .25
ENA  Kennedy Oil 1&2  .25
ENA  Huber  1&2  .25
ENA  FMI Weld 1&2  .25
ENA  Patina  1&2  .25
ENA Cannon  1&2  .25

If there are any questions on this, give me a call.

Barry


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 01:47
PM ---------------------------

Scott Hendrickson
07/25/2000 01:37 PM
To: Julie Gomez, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Fraley,
bruce.s.grant@lmco.com, Ejmunion@aol.com
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000
01:34 PM ---------------------------

John Craig Taylor
07/25/2000 01:25 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N
Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

<< > You have just received the "Aggie Virus"
  >
  > As we don't have any programming experience, this virus works on the
  > honor system.  Please delete all the files from your hard drive and
  > manually forward this virus to everyone on your mailing list.
  >
  > Thanks for your cooperation,
  > Texas A & M Computer Engineering Dept >>


Are these additional counterparties?  I only look at lists I receive from
Credit.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 08:11 AM -----

	Samuel Schott
	03/23/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate,
Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Re: ClickPaper 03-20-01 Amendment _ GCP Response

Rgds.

Samuel

From: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 10:37 AM
To: Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ClickPaper 03-20-01 Ammendment

Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/13/2001>, published as of 11/13/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

FINAL


we need to chat....didn't know about the other cafe!!!!

that's awesome.  can't wait to hear more.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Monique Sanchez" <moshuffle@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 1:59 PM
To:	dutch_quigley@yahoo.com; emharris@dow.com; jake_scarbrough@hotmail.com; jshakerdge@natsource.com; krweaber@pfdj.com; pstevens@hershnerhunter.com; patbelle@mail.ev1.net; susan_m_scott@hotmail.com; Scott, Susan M.; jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
Subject:	Happy New Year

I apologize for sending a mass email.  A few of you have tried to reach me
the last few days by phone and mail and I have been working all but the a
few hours a day that I sleep or play outside.

I have taken on two part time jobs in addition to Deer Valley. I have
started working at the internet cafe...since I used to be here a lot of the
time anyway.  I worked last night from 10-2am after my DV shift.  I waited
on my first celeb..albeit one that only I would
recognize....http://www.eonline.com/On/People/kmetko_pic.html....pretty
funny...he tipped me .50 on 2.50..ha.  The town is loaded with intense
looking film types with their dark rimmed glasses...north face down jackets,
cell phones and ski caps...its pretty funny.  This morning I went for a jog
around down town....I walked down Main st. on my way back and there are all
these people getting photographed along the street...you look at them and
try to figure out if they are famous but they all look like any other guy.
The cafe is a hub for a lot of the news media to send out their stories and
photographs of the fest.  There are 25ish computers in this cafe and all are
being used right now..it is crazy.

I also started work at Windy Ridge Cafe

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


i'm back. 415.782.7822.  jeff


Let me know if you are okay with these and I will forward to Stan


Did you receive my e-mail re SAT.?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490