Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The IBM e-Energy Executive Forum ) "Personalization, Partnership, and
Profitability"

Designed for executives in the utility industry looking to leverage Customer
Relationship Management in the competitive marketplace. Topics will focus on
how process and technology can be leveraged to gain competitive advantage.
Featured speakers will include IT analysts, solution partners, IBM
executives, and customers including: John Goodman, President of e-Satisfy;
Richard Grimes, Director of CRM Energy Services; David Bonnett, Global
e-Energy Sales Executive, Siebel Systems.

www.ibm.com

Learn more about SCIENTECH'S newest InfoGrid: Venture Capital Firms, Emerging
Technology Companies and Services in the Electric Industry.  Get the latest
news and information available today regarding technologies in distributed
generation, fuel cell, solar, wind and energy information services.  Over 110
companies and over 42 investors are featured in this intelligence product.
Download a sample at www.ConsultRCI.com or contact Chris Vigil at (505)
244-7605 for more information.
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 28, 2001

AES Completes Acquisition of IPALCO

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES) announced that it has completed its
acquisition of IPALCO Enterprises, the Indianapolis, Ind.-based utility with
3,000 MW of generation and 433,000 customers in and around Indianapolis.
IPALCO has now become a wholly owned subsidiary of AES through an exchange of
shares in which each outstanding share of IPALCO common stock will be
exchanged for 0.463 shares of AES common stock. IPALCO common stock was
suspended from trading at the close of the market on March 27.

Analysis: The purchase of IPALCO, an established and respected utility in the
Midwest, will help AES to continue to secure its foothold in this region and
further the company's aggressive expansion efforts along the generation side
of its business. AES already owns CILCORP, an energy services company whose
largest subsidiary, CILCO, serves portions of Illinois and Missouri. (Note
that pursuant to an SEC order, AES will restructure and/or sell its ownership
interests in CILCORP within two years in order to retain its status as an
exempt holding company under PUHCA). Thus, through the purchase of IPALCO,
AES is strengthening a presence in the Midwest that it already has
established. In addition, from this purchase we now know that AES, along with
being a global player, intends to remain dominant throughout the United
States as well. Further, the acquisition represents a rather bright
development for AES, considering that the company has recently encountered
some ongoing challenges related to its operations in California.

First, let's examine the value of AES' acquisition of IPALCO. Certainly, the
3,000 MW of generation that AES gained in the deal must have been the primary
draw, but from comments made by Dennis Bakke, AES president and CEO, the
company apparently also wants to become a marketing presence in Indiana (and
the Midwest as a whole). IPALCO gains in the deal by now being under the
aggressive management of AES; the subsidiaries under IPALCO such as
Indianapolis Power & Light will now stand a much better chance for global
development and expansion.

As with other generation acquisitions that AES has made, the company secures
a decided edge over competitors that may have strong marketing presence but
fewer hard assets. With its strong generation portfolio, to which the IPALCO
purchase only adds, AES can further guarantee to potential customers a
reliable power supply. AES is one of the largest generation companies in the
world, having reached this level through a series of strategic acquisitions.
The company's generating assets include interests in 134 facilities totaling
over 48 gigawatts of capacity. By comparison, Calpine has approximately
36,700 MW, Dynegy has a net ownership of 12,497 MW, and Reliant has about
27,000 MW. In addition, AES' electricity distribution network has over
920,000 km of conductor and associated rights of way, and sells over 126,000
GWh per year to over 17 million end-user customers.

AES has surpassed many of its power supply competitors by maintaining an
aggressive growth strategy over the past year. Recent milestones for the
company are too many to list here. However, highlights include acquiring a
controlling interest in Electricidad de Caracas; acquiring 100-percent
interest in Tractebel Power; purchasing 70-percent interest in the Mohave
Generating Station in Laughlin, Nev.; and purchasing GeoUtilities, Inc., an
Internet-based superstore for energy and telecom services. Just since the
start of 2001, AES entered into an agreement to purchase all of the energy
assets of Thermo Ecotec Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Thermo
Electron Corporation of Waltham, Mass., for $195 million, and announced new
generation development projects in Texas and California. AES also has
continued its international expansion with an acquisition of a 140-MW
oil-fired co-generation facility in Italy, the acquisition of a 290-MW
barge-mounted natural-gas fired generating business in Nigeria, and the
purchase of additional ownership interest in a 1,000-MW hydro plant in
Argentina.

As I've said in the past, AES is a company to watch. Even when acquisitions
that AES is making seem rather small, they must be taken within the context
of the portfolio that AES is building. Whether it's generation, retail
marketing, telecom, or selling electricity over the Internet, AES has a
foothold in many different areas. AES is a major player that can offer the
full package to a customer, which may in the end be its strongest advantage.
The company maintains that it is engaged in three lines of businesses, which
are all equally important to its strategy: power generation, network delivery
services and retail energy marketing. However, it is important to recognize
that AES continues to build a huge generation arsenal and now has the
capability to market its commodity products through its marketing
subsidiaries.

However, although AES has had a fairly successful year, the company has hit
some bumps and made some questionable decisions along the way, all of which
were related to the California market. AES has established several tolling
agreements with Williams Corp. for the power plants that AES owns in
California. Under the tolling agreements, AES essentially rents its plants to
Williams so that Williams can generate fuel to electricity, which it then can
sell on the wholesale market. In other words, Williams had a contract to
market all of the power generated by AES' California plants. In hindsight,
AES may regret the questionable decision to enter into the tolling agreements
with Williams in California. Although AES did well last year, with net income
rising 181 percent to $641 million, the company reportedly lost $11 million
on the lucrative California market. Meanwhile, Williams (NYSE: WMB) reported
unaudited 2000 income from continuing operations of $873.2 million, or $1.95
per share on a diluted basis, versus $178 million, or 40 cents per share on a
restated basis, for 1999. AES also took a hit when it had to pay air
pollution fines and buy power on the wholesale market to meet its obligations
to Williams when it was forced to shut some plants down.

Further, AES (along with other companies) continues to fall under the intense
scrutiny of FERC for pricing that the commission has deemed "unjust and
unreasonable" for power generated at AES-owned plants. FERC's investigation
centers on the unavailability of certain so-called "must run" generating
plants in the Los Angeles area that are owned by AES Southland, a subsidiary
of AES. A "must run" plant is a generating facility that the California ISO
can call upon to provide energy and ancillary service essential to the
reliability of the California transmission network. Several weeks ago, FERC
announced that a preliminary investigation raised serious questions about the
actions of Williams Energy Marketing and Trading and AES.

On March 14, FERC gave the two companies 20 days to explain why they should
not refund $10.86 million to California utilities. Further, FERC said that
"Williams had a financial incentive to prolong any outages" of two AES-owned
plants last April and May. "Williams received more revenues as a result of
the respective outages," the commission said. AES responded to the charges by
saying that the plants were taken off line for repairs and that it did not
share in market revenues from sales of power from the plants. According to a
report in The Washington Post, AES Pacific Group vice president Stu Ryan said
that as long as the plants are in operating condition, Williams decides when
they will run and what it will charge for their power.

As a result of the unavailability of the two "must run" AES plants, the
state's ISO had to obtain power from other plants, also owned by AES, where
the power was much more expensive and the companies made much larger
profits.  The commission said its investigation indicated that AES and
Williams refused to make the two "must run" plants available "for reasons
that were not directly related to the necessary and timely maintenance" of
the plant.

Many power supply companies that were active in the California wholesale
market now are retreating due to the volatility and uncertainty of the
state's market. Although it remains unclear how AES will continue to
participate in the California market, it may be a smart move for the company
to focus on expanding operations in other regions of the United States (such
as the Midwest). Yet, how AES' acquisition of IPALCO will impact the
company's bottom line remains to be seen. Standard & Poor's (S&P) is
reserving its assessment of the partnership for the time being, and is
keeping AES on CreditWatch. AES' double-'B' corporate credit, single-'B'-plus
rating on subordinated debt, and single-'B' rating on the company's trust
preferred securities remain intact pending further review and information
about the acquisition of IPALCO. Also, S?lowered its corporate credit ratings
on IPALCO to triple-'B' from single-'A'-plus, and IPALCO's subsidiary,
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. (IPL), to triple-'B' from double-'A'-minus,
and revised the CreditWatch implications to positive from negative. S?expects
to address the CreditWatch status in the next two weeks.

On March 27, AES shares closed at about $47.75. As of mid-morning on March
28, AES shares were priced at about $50.00. Over the last few days, AES
shares have increased by about 5 percent and have closely tracked the Dow
Jones Utility Average.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Brant,
 EnergyOne has responded to the requested changes.  They agree to the
revision of the MAC language but threw in a money wrench by adding a warm and
fuzzy triggering event  if a party refused to provide security within 48
hours of a reasonable request therefore.  No standard is provided as to the
reason for the request.    They also deleted the original Collateral
Threshold language which was in their first draft.  Please respond to these
matters to me and to Sylvia Pollan.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 09:47 AM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	05/21/2001 08:59 AM

		 To: Sylvia S Pollan/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnergyOne

Attached is a memo of the major items in their comments to our requested
changes.  Let me know when you are ready to discuss.


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 01:01 PM -----

	Candace L Bywaters
	10/23/2000 08:50 AM

		 To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Rose/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sale of the Point Comfort 12" Pipeline

I sm preparing to open up a bidding activity for the subject Pipeline which
is approximately four miles of 12" pipe under account # 3224.  The nbv is
$18,901.

I have dusted off my list of salvage bidders and under separate cover will
publish these seeking additions or deletions from any of you who care to
contribute.  ;I am assuming that this pipe is not viably operating and would
appreciate any information in this regard if I am incorrect.

As for now, I would like a sample Purchase and Sale Agreement and a
Confidentiality Agreement that I may use with my solicitations.  This would
include some type of alignment sheet depicting the pipe and its legal
description, etc.  You are all seasoned in knowing what level of data I need
at this stage of the offer.

I already have at least one interested party in this and would like to move
forward as soon as possible to get this on the table for bids.  I would
appreciate receiving the necessary materials by October 31, or information of
how I can contribute to this activity.  Also, please let me know if there is
someone else I should copy on this.

Thank you in advance for your assistance in this endeavor.


Helen-

Just checking on whether there will be a lesson time available on Sunday
afternoon.  Saturday late afternoon might work for us as well.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira  (Kali Pereira)


Jim, my understanding is that there continues to be some discussion on
whether there will be functional seperation of the retail and wholesale
businesses and to what extent and under what strategy these are undertaken.
I am not sure that we want to put ourselves in a box under any structure
until these things are completely ironed out eg) country managers et al.  I'm
not in agreement with any memo that further details the organization beyond
what was outlined in the original memo.  However, I am in agreement that this
needs to get resolved ASAP unfortunately Frevert and Skilling and most of the
first world is out this week.  I ask for your patience.

Lets discuss.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/22/2000 05:37 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Miguel
Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Randy Young@ECT
cc:
Subject: See Attached

Draft memo on the functional alignment of South America under the new
organization.  Would like to send out to the South America organization
tonight to give people partial information on work in progress.  Silence is
bothering people a lot and the company is at risk of losing people.
Definitive organization memo out in the coming days, after complete
coordination with wholesale and retail in Houston.  Look at the first version
of the memo.  Please reply with any comments asap.


Rob,

The product descriptions look good.  Go ahead and move forward with the rest
of the process.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977

Robert B Cass
09/21/2000 03:14 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Agua Dulce and Thompsonville Products

Eric - Per your request, I have revised the following product descriptions to
distinguish between Receipt Points and Delivery Points.  Please advise
accordingly:

HPL/Thompsonville:

The Transaction is for delivery of pool gas via the Houston Pipe Line
Company, as scheduled by the Counterparty, at a Receipt Point or a Delivery
Point shown below.  The applicable Receipt Points are:  Lobo Thompsonville
(Meter #9648); Tejas Thompsonville (Meter #6351); or PG&E Thompsonville
(Meter #6296).  The applicable Delivery Point is:  NGPL Thompsonville (Meter
#1342).

HPL/Agua Dulce:

The Transaction is for delivery of pool gas via the Houston Pipe Line
Company, as scheduled by the Counterparty, at a Receipt Point or a Delivery
Point shown below.  The applicable Receipt Points are:  PG&E Riverside (Meter
#6040); PG&E Agua Dulce (Meter #584); Tennessee Agua Dulce (Meter #574); Lobo
Agua Dulce (Meter #7038); Tejas Gregory (Meter #3358); Channel Agua Dulce
(Meter #3500); MOPS/NNG Tivoli (Meter #5674); or Tomcat (Meter #553).  The
applicable Delivery Points are: Tejas Riverside (Meter #3543); NGPL Riverside
(Meter #3545); Channel Agua Dulce (Meter #3500); Tennessee Agua Dulce (Meter
#694); or Koch Bayside (Meter #3537).

Thanks - Rob Cass x 35491

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           09/21/2000 02:14 PM

To: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Agua Dulce and Thompsonville Products

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 02:12 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           09/18/2000 04:22 PM

To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Agua Dulce and Thompsonville Products

Here is the detail on the new products:

THOMPSONVILLE
Receipt Pts
Lobo Thompsonville (Meter #9648)
Tejas Thompsonville (Meter #6351)
PG&E Thompsonville (Meter #6296)

Delivery Pt.
NGPL Thomsponville (Meter #1342)

AGUA DULCE
Receipt Pts.
PG&E Riverside (Meter #6040)
PG&E Agua Dulce (Meter #584)
Tennesee Agua Dulce (Meter #574)
Lobo Agua Dulce (Meter #7038)
Tejas Gregory (Meter #3358)
Channel Agua Dulce (Meter #3500)
MOPS/NNG Tivoli (Meter #5674)
Tomcat (Meter #553)

Delivery Pts.
Tejas Riverside (Meter #3543)
NGPL Riverside (Meter #3545)
Channel Agua Dulce (Meter #3500)
Tenessee Agua Dulce (Meter #694)
Koch Bayside (Meter #3537)

We would like to get these products out by bid week if at all possible.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Tanya:  Do we need to differentiate between the MAC as used in the CSA and in
the Schedule (as an "Additional Event of Default") with respect to the
disappearance of a credit rating from either S&P or Moody's (or both) based
on your usage in power masters?

I believe that we agreed that for purposes of the CSA (when S&P and Moody's
are indicated on the credit worksheet), both ratings must disappear to
trigger the MAC.

For purposes of an Additional Event of Default, should we just pose the
question to credit?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 05:47 PM -----

	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/09/2001 05:31 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Cargill Alliant master

It should say either; therefore, if one were to disappear, an Event of
Default would occur.  This was the intent and is probably consistent with
that in the Master Power agmt.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:22 PM
To: Sacks, Edward
Subject: Cargill Alliant master

Ed:  For the Additional Event of Default (ratings trigger), do you intend the
MAC to apply when only one or both credit ratings disappear?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Michael is still running 102 fever.  I spoke to the doctor again today, and
he said that Michael had a pretty good bit of strep.  I'm feeling better,
though, and have gotten a decent amount of work done.  In fact, Christy
Chapman may give you some original documents I initialled and faxed to her.
I'll explain later.  If I had your fax number I think I would have faxed them
to you.

Have a great day tomorrow.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           10/26/2000 04:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Ledford and Fehr Memorandums of Options

Not yet.  Karen called me after I sent her my e-mail regarding the several
missing items and she assured me she would take care of the acknowledgments.
I did not want to mention it in my e-mail to her yesterday (thought I would
save that until I had a chance to see if she sent anything to Fred and he is
out of town).  I have not forgotten about it though.

How are you and handsome doing?  Feeling any better?  I talked to your other
son "Carlos" today and he was thinking about leaving early to go home
(something he ate yesterday at Massa's).

K-

Kay Mann
10/26/2000 03:52 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Ledford and Fehr Memorandums of Options

By the way, did they ever get the acknowledgments taken care of?


From Christi Nicolay
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 09:59
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 07/03/2001 10:29 PM
To: Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I would guess that AEC has had a change of heart - since they signed the MOU
with Southern.  I would expect them to withdraw their comments.  I will talk
to Jeff Parrish at AEC and find out what's going on.

I talked to Bob Reilley about the EPSA filing.  He made it sound like it had
just been forgotten in the rush and he didn't seem to have a clear idea about
what EPSA should say in a filing.  That's funny since he drafted the original
document we started talking from.  Anyway, we discussed it again and he
agreed to get back to EPSA and discuss a filing.  The topics would be:
(1) MOUs don't mean much
(2) No real progress has been shown
(3) FERC need to oversee the process
(4) FERC needs to ensure a collaborative process is implemented
I didn't tell Bob that Enron wants to stay out of it, but we talked about it
being better to have EPSA carry the ball when we first started looking at
this.  I think your bringing it up in the EPSA phone call will help.  Let me
know if it looks like Bob is not following up with EPSA.

	Donna Fulton
	07/03/2001 01:18 PM

		 To: Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

Joe, I agree with the approach that we should try to get EPSA to file.  I
have spoken with Mark Bennett over at EPSA and he indicated that he hadn't
gotten to it.  Perhaps I should bring it up on the EPSA call this Thursday,
just a gentle reminder.

AEC was the culprit who commented on June 22.  They were extremely negative
about Southern's lack of results in their "attempt" to increase participation
in the RTO.  They said, "Southern suggests no more than the possibility of
another paper 'RTO proposal' by December 15, 2001."  They do ask for a
technical conference by FERC staff and then a settlement judge proceeding
thereafter.

	Joe Connor
	07/02/2001 11:43 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I met with Andy Dearman and Bill Newman of Southern on Friday.  They talked
about what is going on with the non-jurisdictional utilities that have signed
a MOU to develop a RTO.  The group has met a couple of times to discuss the
process they will use.  Confidentiality agreements have been signed, so no
details are available, but they have agreed to a voting structure for the
development.  Southern has about one third of the votes (and 65%of the
assets) and it takes at least two other parties agreeing with Southern to
carry a vote.  Southern says they spent a lot of time convincing the other
parties that Southern was not going to run, or dominate, the process.  After
that, Southern said the group started to pull together and get organized for
the development.

They said everyone in the group appeared to be ready to find ways to make the
RTO work and resolve the hurdles the non-jurisdictional utilities have been
expressing with the development of other RTOs.  They said there were some
rough spots that had to be resolved and they couldn't be sure agreement would
be reached, but at this point there was a lot of cooperation.

Andy and Bill wanted to convince me that this was not a delaying tactic by
Southern and they were doing everything possible to ensure that a complete
RTO filing could be ready by 12/15/01.  They also said they thought this is
what Ed Holland wanted to discuss with Steve Kean.

We talked about how other stakeholders could have input to the development.
They said that it was too early to make any commitment, but the group had
started thinking about it and they expected an input process to be available
by late summer.
They said Southern was in favor of some process that would provide
stakeholders the opportunity to look at what was being considered and advise
the development group as early as possible.  They said they understood the
difficulty stakeholders had with the approach Southern used in its initial
filing and wanted to do it different, but they pointed out again that
Southern could not dictate the process that would be allowed by the group.
In the meantime, they said if we wanted to provide position papers on any
part of the RTO development they would make sure the papers were circulated
in the group or we could continue to hold bilateral discussions with them or
other members of the development group.

Jim, I still think it would be worthwhile to have a meeting between Ed and
Steve Kean, and I would include you and invite Andy and Bill to come.  I
don't think they want to discuss anything technical at this point; they just
want to convince Enron that the approach Southern is taking provides the
quickest development of a RTO for the Southern area, and they want any help
we can give in convincing FERC to let this process run.

I also think we need to pass on filing a response to Southern's May 15th
status report, either alone or with Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (
Donna, I guess that's who you meant in the memo below, since AEC has signed a
MOU with Southern?).  I will get in touch with Bob Reilley to find out why we
haven't heard from EPSA on its filing.  I still think that's the best
approach.

	Donna Fulton
	06/28/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Southern  supplemental status report

I am attaching the supplemental status report that Southern filed in its
RT01-77 on June 20.  They have included MOUs with Georgia Transmission Corp,
Santee Cooper and Alabama Electric Coop to work on development of an RTO.
These are really general, more of the same of what we've seen from Southern.

Also we had talked  about possible comments on the May 15 Southern filing;
Coral was working on comments through EPSA.  Nothing has been filed by EPSA
yet.

Alabama did file comments on the May 15 status report and they have asked
that the FERC establish a technical conference to "publicly air and evaluate
the alleged governance concerns and the concerns regarding significant
delay..."  Following a technical conference, they ask for a judge to convene
a settlement conference at FERC to "undertake a properly supervised and
serious development of an RTO for the SE without further wasted time."

At this point we could consider filing comments in support of the Coop
comments.


Daren,

Should I change the counterparty on this sale, or is that handled by
marketing?  Also, we may need to look at changing the Storage Agmt.   Please
advise.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers@ECT
12/13/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Has the volumes for the deal below been nomd' yet under the new deal.  Credit
is having a cow because they are showing exposure still under Cannon.  Is
there a way that we can get this done tomorrow?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 05:05
PM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           12/12/2000 03:29 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Julie,

Cannon is not a wellhead producer.  The meters below are assigned to the
following individuals:

Meter #  Scheduler

68  Mary Poorman
4132  Jackie Young
1040  Aimee Lannou
1606  Mary Poorman

These schedulers should be advised of the changes.

Bob

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 01:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

New deal 529753.

Robert, please do your magic.

Kris, I'm not sure who in your group this should go to, this is a sale.

Julie

Brant Reves
12/11/2000 12:24 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cannon assignment

The trades below were originally executed between HPL and Cannon Interests
Houston per terms of a specific Master Physical Agreement.  After recieving
back executed documentation, we are ready to have the trades offically moved
within the various Enron capuring systems from Cannon to Kinder Morgan Texas
Pipeline, Inc. per the terms and conditions of the recently executed Master
Physical Agreement between HPL and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Inc.

First, here are the TAG Nos. of the trades we wish to have assigned.

NU2813
NA0376

Second, several trades are listed within a ERMS book called:  P A M
These trades show a 12-31-00 expiry and their Nos. are:

522284
830689
892696
904035
904276

I am not sure what these numbers are.  But, could you move them as well.

Thanks for your help.

brant


I can so whatever you if I want. I do owe you drinks though let me know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok.  i am not mad at you.  i am just joking!  i like to give you a hard time.  don't "so whatever" me!  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

we were talking about the error and I brought up your name and asked what you do jokingly, then someone said dont blame her because she is cute and I said you are right who is her boss meaning so we can blame him. So whatever

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't remember hearing any compliments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I didnt say anything bad, actually it was a compliment

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Um no.  Should I?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

you are not going to let it go are you?


Sending you a copy of my equity trading research report.
This is Friday's copy.
The JNJ trade worked well.
Will send out Tuesday's report soon.
Bobby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gerry, Robert
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 1:02 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Schneider, Bryce
Subject:	friday equity report

Johnson and Johnson (JNJ) will come out with earnings on Tuesday.

JNJ is currently trading high in its 30 day trading range.
The 30 day high is 60.18.
The 30 day low is 56.23.
JNJ with two hours to close of market is now at 59.85.

JNJ has trended up and in the opposite direction of the Dow in the recent market selloff as investors have moved to safety.

I look for JNJ to swing down from here in its tight 30 day range.

I look to short JNJ now and cover a little under 59.

JNJ is not volatile.
This is a mediocre trade at best and only good for 1 to 1.5 points.
If JNJ continues rallying I look to continue shorting and wait for the 2 to 3 point downswing that will follow.

Yesterday's recommendation of a short MSFT position was a much stronger idea.
But this is Friday's report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harley Davidson (HDI) released strong earnings last night.

The stock rallied to as high as 55.50 (up 1.20) and has since retrenched to 54 (down 0.30).

Harley is a strong short candidate at any point over 55.
It trades down from there into its 30 day range.


Thank you for contacting Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.  We have received your
e-mail and will be responding to it as quickly as possible.

At Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., we strive to maintain a goal of responding to
all e-mail inquiries within 24 hours.  In order to meet this high quality
standard, we respond to customer inquiries in the order in which they are
received.

We look forward to assisting you.  Again, thank you for contacting Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.

0099-8984


April 30, 2001
Notice No. 01-144

TO:
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendment to COMEX Aluminum Supplement No. 1 &Official List of
Approved Brands and Markings.8

The Exchange proposes to amend COMEX Aluminum Supplement No. 1 &Official List
of Approved Brands and Markings8.  The proposed amendment changes the name of
the producer of the &NSA8 brand of aluminum from NSA Ltd to Century Aluminum
of Kentucky LLC. The Exchange has been informed that NSA Ltd. has been
acquired by Century Aluminum Company and that the company name has been
changed to Century Aluminum of Kentucky LLC.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission must approve the proposed
amendment.  The Exchange Membership will be notified when Commission approval
is received and the effective date.

A copy of the proposed amendment can be found at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_144.htm

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at (212) 299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-144)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Opps.

VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 06/01/2001 04:49:31 PM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Re:

THIS IS A CONTINETAL EXPRESS FLIGHT

THEY DONT OFFER FIRST CLASS==

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
----- Message from Kay.Mann@enron.com on Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:48:35 -0500 -----
To:	VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>
Subject:	Re:

Any first class upgrades available?

VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 06/01/2001 04:45:30 PM

To:   KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject:

                                          AGENT VA/VA BOOKING REF
YZEY2A

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN KAY MANN X 57566

  DATE:  JUN 01 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN HOUSTON TX     MEMPHIS TN     745A    930A
CO 4096    Y          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO MEMPHIS INTL
                            TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 11C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN MEMPHIS TN     HOUSTON TX     555P    740P
CO 3841    Y          MON   MEMPHIS INTL   G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL B
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 12C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/JR33G1

MANN/C KAY                               TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7029446540

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


scheije@selectenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

There are numerous emails floating around with suggested changes to the
EDRP and DADRP Manuals. This makes it very difficult for BIC members to
know what is to be voted on Thursday.

Either those wanting changes should come to BIC with motions to modifiy or
we put off the approvals at the moment until there is a better fix on what
it is we are voting for...(or hold revisions for later).

Jim


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  lwbthemarine@alltel.net
Date:  Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:51:43 -0600
Subject:  weather.com - Local Weather - Fairfield, TX
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'weather.com - local weather - fairfield, tx.url'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


please remove my name and information from the registered user list.  Do not
sell my information.

Phillip Allen


Please disregard the first email. I made one slight change.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Sewell, Doug
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Denver Office Expenses


Stinson,

Attached please find a draft Consulting Agreement for use with Henwood.

You will want to review it before you send it to Henwood.  Please see Section
6 in particular.  Also, I put in that arbitration will be in Houston and
Texas law will apply.  We could move that to New York, with New York law if
that is better for Henwood.  If pressed, we could make it Singapore or U.K.
law, with arb in Singapore.  but any other law, including Australian law,
would mean we would need to get this contract reviewed by foreign counsel--so
I strongly urge you to argue for Texas or NY law (no other state, please).

I tried to make this Agreement reflect the terms in Henwood's proposal, and
believe I succeeded.  Our form has some additional terms not contained in
their Proposal, as well as FCPA boilerplate (ie., the "Business Conduct" and
"Drug Policy" language).  Also, I just want to point out that this Agreement
allows them to subcontract the work--but only with our written agreement.
Under their Proposal, the subcontractor costs will be charged to us at cost
plus 15%--so you might not want to do it.

Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Bonnie


Thought you might like this.

-e
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 04:50 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           12/15/99 04:06 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A$M and its "second tier" status

---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 12/15/99 04:05
PM ---------------------------

"Michael P. Lyons" <mlyons@gwinnroby.com> on 12/15/99 12:28:44 PM
To: "William J. Murphy (E-mail)" <bmurphy@velaw.com>,
Trinamaurer@worldnet.att.net, "Russell Berry" <berryruss@aol.com>, "Russell
Berry" <berry_russell@hotmail.com>, "Rebecca Lemoine" <rlemoi2@lsu.edu>,
michele_murphy@msn.com, "McDonald, James"
<James.McDonald@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Matt Chaney" <mchaney@jandflaw.com>,
JROBERTS@BARONBUDD.COM, jdavis@brownsims.com, "Janice Hinshaw"
<jhinshaw@gwinnroby.com>, "Heather E. Kitzman" <hkitzman@cooperinst.org>,
"Gus David Oppermann V" <gopperma@ricefowler.com>, "Gary Joe Jimmy Joe Frank
Billy Bob Jack (E-mail)" <jacktxcpa@aol.com>, dkelley@beacongrp.com, "Dan
Vickers (E-mail)" <warickco@flash.net>, credd2002@aol.com,
corbymaurer@worldnet.att.net, "Chris Miller (E-mail)"
<"chris_miller"@nextlink.net>, chris_miller@nextlink.net, "Chris Edwards"
<rattlers@earthlink.net>, "Chris Egan" <cegan@mail.smu.edu>,
cheb75@yahoo.com, brian.s.mcclure@ac.com, "Ami Chokshi"
<achokshi99@yahoo.com>, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: A$M and its "second tier" status

Hate to promote the obvious.  US News & World Reports has their most current
college rankings out, and, yes, Texas is in the top 50 schools in the
country.  A$M in the meantime has returned to their fabled "second tier"
status where all "second tier" schools belong.  I don't really care if Texas
Monthly prints a huge front page article that says "UT....THE BEST SCHOOL IN
TEXAS".....Of course Texas Monthly would never do that because IT ISN"T
NEWS!!!!!!!   Tell us something we don't know!  You will recall that a couple
of years ago, Texas Monthly reported that a$m was "the best school in Texas",
relying on US NEWS & WORLD REPORTS rankings.  I guess that was short lived.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/natunivs/natu_a.htm
 - att1.htm
 -  USNews - edu.url
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 12/15/99 04:05
PM ---------------------------

"Michael P. Lyons" <mlyons@gwinnroby.com> on 12/15/99 12:40:09 PM
To: "William J. Murphy (E-mail)" <bmurphy@velaw.com>,
Trinamaurer@worldnet.att.net, "Russell Berry" <berryruss@aol.com>, "Russell
Berry" <berry_russell@hotmail.com>, "Rebecca Lemoine" <rlemoi2@lsu.edu>,
michele_murphy@msn.com, "Matt Chaney" <mchaney@jandflaw.com>, "McDonald,
James" <James.McDonald@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Kitzman, Heather"
<hkitzman@cooperinst.org>, jdavis@brownsims.com, "Janice Hinshaw"
<jhinshaw@gwinnroby.com>, "Gus David Oppermann V" <gopperma@ricefowler.com>,
"Gary Joe Jim Bob Frank Billy Bob Jack" <jacktxcpa@aol.com>,
dkelley@beacongrp.com, "Dan Vickers (E-mail)" <warickco@flash.net>,
credd2002@aol.com, corbymaurer@worldnet.att.net, chris_miller@nextlink.net,
"Chris Egan" <cegan@mail.smu.edu>, "Chris Edwards" <rattlers@earthlink.net>,
"Cheb" <cheb75@yahoo.com>, brian.s.mcclure@ac.com, "Ami Chokshi"
<achokshi99@yahoo.com>, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: UT/a$m business school and engineering school comparisons

Whoops.  Looks like a$m is STILL ranked considerably lower than Texas in both
Business and Engineering, in spite of the fact that every agroid will tell
you differently.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/cat13wi.htm
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/cat12spc.htm

 - att1.htm
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 12/15/99 04:05
PM ---------------------------

"Michael P. Lyons" <mlyons@gwinnroby.com> on 12/15/99 03:54:03 PM
To: Trinamaurer@worldnet.att.net, "Russell Berry" <berryruss@aol.com>,
"Russell Berry" <berry_russell@hotmail.com>, "Rebecca Lemoine"
<rlemoi2@lsu.edu>, "Murphy, Billy" <bmurphy@velaw.com>, "Kitzman, Heather"
<hkitzman@cooperinst.org>, "Jonathan Gansell" <jgansell@gwinnroby.com>,
JROBERTS@BARONBUDD.COM, jdavis@brownsims.com, "Janice Hinshaw"
<jhinshaw@gwinnroby.com>, James.McDonald@SouthernEnergy.Com, "Gus David
Oppermann V" <gopperma@ricefowler.com>, "Gary Joe Jim Bob Frank Billy Bob
Jack" <jacktxcpa@aol.com>, dkelley@beacongrp.com, "Dan Vickers \(E-mail\)"
<warickco@flash.net>, credd2002@aol.com, corbymaurer@worldnet.att.net,
chris_miller@nextlink.net, "Chris Miller \(E-mail\)"
<"chris_miller"@nextlink.net>, "Chris Edwards" <rattlers@earthlink.net>,
"Chris Egan" <cegan@mail.smu.edu>, cheb75@yahoo.com, brian.s.mcclure@ac.com,
"Bobby McGehee" <bmcgehee@gwinnroby.com>, "Ami Chokshi"
<achokshi99@yahoo.com>, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Fw: Big 12 Conference, University of Texas, Document 1629_108
Football Coach Comments & Player Comments from Mon. Revision [108]

-----Original Message-----
From: Teamlink <support@pivotalcc.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:37 PM
Subject: Big 12 Conference, University of Texas, Document 1629_108 Football
Coach Comments & Player Comments from Mon. Revision [108]

>====TeamLink Document Update====
>
>University of Texas Football Coach Comments & Player Comments from Mon.
>Revision [108] has just been updated by the Athletic Department and is
>attached to this email.
>
>
>====Special TeamLink Offer====
>
>Longhorn Football fans, the 1999 season is almost over but you can
>relive all of the exciting action by ordering the Longhorn Video Season
>Ticket.  Call (512) 478-1833 to get your own piece of Longhorn history.
>Mention Texas TeamLink and save 10%.  Perfect for the Orange blood on
>your Christmas list.
>
>====Web Sites====
>
>Get more info at the official athletics site:
>http://www.texassports.com
>
>Be sure to check out official Longhorn merchandise at:
>http://www.coop-bookstore.com
>
>To modify what we send you go to:  http://www.texasteamlink.com
>
>
>====Customer Support - 7 days a week, 10am-10pm EST====
>
>If you are unable to view the attached document or have other questions,
>please contact us:
>
>Toll Free: 1-800-599-9402
>Email:  mailto:support@pivotalcc.com
>
>Live Online Customer Service:  available at our website
>
>
>====AOL Subscribers====
>
>Get more info at the official athletics site:  HREF="http://www.texassports.com">Click Here
>
>Be sure to check out official Longhorn merchandise at:  HREF="http://www.coop-bookstore.com">Click Here
>
>To modify what we send you go to:  HREF="http://www.texasteamlink.com">Click Here
>
>
>====First Time Users====
>
>You need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view these documents.  To download
>please go to our website.
>
>

 - 1629_108.PDF


Rev. Coletta Eichenberger
314 High St.
Boonville, MO 65233
cbeichenberger@undata.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Rev. Coletta Eichenberger


Soussan,

Thanks for your message. It would be great to meet you when you come to
Houston.
 I shall be in town on December 7,  flying back from Philly in the morning.
Assuming that the flight is on schedule, I shall be available for dinner.
Please, let me know how I can contact you on Thursday, December the 7th,
to confirm.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 11/26/2000 09:04:01 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Houston visit

Dear Vince,

Greetings from NY and hope that all is well and you had a great
Thanksgiving.  I'll be coming to Houston for 12/6-12/7 and hope you are
available either evening for dinner.  Would be great to see you again and
catch up with the latest... I really enjoyed my visit last April, your
insights, and the risk book you gave me.

I do hope you're available to meet and pls let me know which evening suits
you better.

Best,
Soussan Faiz
Texaco Inc.
914 253 4187


Looks like we can get some help to automate the swaption notification process
going forward...
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 11:31
AM ---------------------------

Ron Nolte
06/29/2000 12:32 PM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

Souad,

There are expiration dates for swaptions/options on the "Detail" button in
TAGG Deal Capture.  Let's
do the following.  Go into TAGG Deal Capture and check to make sure these
dates are valid for swaptions/options.

We will write a report that you can run that identifies deals that are
expiring.

Thanks, Ron

Brent A Price
06-29-2000 02:49 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

We really need to raise the priority on getting this done.  We had a swaption
with significant value to Enron not get excersied this month due to
breakdowns in the manual process.  Let me know how extensive this will be
from an IT perspective.  Thanks

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           06/28/2000 09:53 PM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

the reason for this message and the other message addressed to Jeff Johnson
is that we have system modifications that due to system resources may or may
not get done.  note the ClickPaper comment.
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
06/28/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

Ron Nolte
06/28/2000 03:49 PM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TAGG modification request

Souad,

We can implement this - the question is "when". As I indicated to Jeff, we
are currently working on ClickPaper
but we will work on whatever is a higher priority from Enron's point of view.

Thanks, Ron
do to get your request

Souad Mahmassani
06-28-2000 02:47 PM
To: Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TAGG modification request

Ron,

A series of significant events took place this week where it made it more
apparent that a modification in Tagg is highly needed.   Without going into a
lot of detail regarding the events, the modification desired is simply an
Expiration Date field for certain types of transactions (Swaptions), where a
date is keyed by the user at the time the trade is entered into TAGG.  In
addition, this feature will permit TAGG to prompt the user or users with a
message box of the Expiration date and associated Deal Number at a later
time, before the expiration date becomes current (i.e. a week before the
expiration date becomes current).

This request carries a lot of value for it allows ENA to avoid a variety of
risks underlying missing execution of certain types of trades.  This issue
was addressed in the past and I would like to raise it again.

Can we implement such modification? Your prompt response is highly needed and
your feedback is appreciated.

Thanks.

I work on the confirmation desk, reporting to Jeff Sorenson.  Please call me
if you have any questions or suggestions (X37580).


Rick

As per your request, see attached summary regarding our activities in Brasil
from Jan to April.
Unfortunately we couldn't sent to you before due to a lot problems we are
facing here.
Thanks
Sergio Assad


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041019.txt is empty.


Bible Study will be held today Wednesday, December 13th from 12:00 to 1:00 in
conference room 30C1.  Carol Word will be giving the lesson.

SPECIAL NOTE:

Since I will be on vacation until January 2nd here is your notice for the
next couple of Bible Studies.

Bible Study will be held today Wednesday, December 20th from 12:00 to 1:00 in
conference room 30C2.  Carol Word will be giving the lesson.

Melissa will be checking on the conference room for Wednesday, December 27th
and will send out a notice that morning.

Thanks and I hope everyone has a safe and blessed Holiday

Mary Kay


With Sara Shackleton, Carol St. Clair, Elizabeth Sager, Leslie Hanson


Edith,

I talked to Tom Swank today on the Synthetic Combined Cycle. Tom wants to
have the capacity payment numbers based off of mid and bid curve as well as
offer curve for indicative proposal to Aquila. Carl told me that you already
ran the model one month ago. Is it relevant idea? Let me know your thought.
Thank you.

Jinsung (37330)


In preparation for our conference call on Monday, attached are two memos
prepared by Sam Behrends regarding possible timing of the merger.  We asked
Sam to prepare these memos to help Paul in his negotiations with TANC and
SMUD.

We'll talk to everyone on Monday.  If you need to reach me this weekend, my
number is (301) 320-5721.

Sarah


http://search.netscape.com/cgi-bin/search?cp=nsiwidsrc&search=reverse+search&x
=36&y=1
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
02:16 PM ---------------------------

ERisk <ERisk@email.eRisks.com> on 04/05/2001 10:41:53 AM
Please respond to <info@erisk.com>
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Risk management portal update

We are sending you this email because you requested more information
from us after hearing us speak at a conference, stopping by our
booth in an exhibit hall, or indicating to one of our partners that
you would like to receive risk management-related emails.

_______________________________________________________________

We redesigned and relaunched our free risk management portal
http://www.erisk.com
Here are some of the exciting new features you can explore on our
redesigned site:

RISK NEWS AND ANALYSIS
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0Bia0Al
ERisk's experienced editorial and journalistic staff now offer
insightful Weekly News Analysis and original Feature Articles in
addition to risk-relevant Daily News stories.
New: A second look at the usefulness of RAROC in our feature
"Between RAROC and a Hard Place"
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0B4W0Ai

RISK COMMUNITY
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0BWh0Aa
We are continuing provide free online educational and networking
opportunities through our iConference series.
The Job Listings and Events Calendar have been relocated to the
"News" section of the site.
New: Register for upcoming iConference on Economic Capital
Attribution on April 11
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0BSA0Ar

RISK REFERENCE & EDUCATION
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0Bic0An
Check out our new, unique Risk Jigsaw tutorial, Research Archive,
and Hot Topics along with the Case Studies, Risk Links, and ERisk
Encyclopedia you knew and loved on our old site.
New: Take an in-depth look at Credit Risk Management in the new Risk
Jigsaw piece
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0BWf0AY

ERISK PRODUCTS & SERVICES
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0Bif0Aq
Did you think ERisk was just a website?  Find out about our
Consulting, Analytics, and Risk Transfer Advisory Services here.
New: Get an overview of our products and services at
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0B5C0AP

Visit our homepage to take our site tour and discover the new
ERisk.com today.  Then register (for free) at
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0BXt0An
to access our content and receive weekly risk news by email!

If you have any questions or comments about our site, please
contact info@erisk.com.

Your Friends at ERisk.com

****************************************************
To unsubscribe, please forward this email to
unsubscribe_contacts@email.eRisks.com
To subscribe to our regular email newsletter and receive
iConference invitations, register at
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbE0CBQRR0EFL0BXt0An


Tana,

Accounts Payable received a hard copy of your expense report; however, it is
not submitted in XMS for us to process for payment. Please go back into XMS
and select the report and click submit to your manager for approval. The
report not submitted is for $728.58.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,

Vance Bates
Accounts Payable
713-853-5731


Stuart,

I have difficulties opening the attachment.
Please, resend as a  .doc file  or  a   .pdf file.

Vince

"Stuart Russell Hamel" <hamel@ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 04:52:12 PM
Please respond to <hamel@rice.edu>
To: <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <jason.sokolov@enron.com>
Subject:

Dr. Kaminski:

Please see our attached paper.

Thank you,
Jed Howard, Brian Nelson, and
Stuart Hamel
(713) 218-8903

 - winmail.dat


Dude,

Just wanted to wish you a very Happy Birthday. I hope they're not too rough
on you over there. Have a great day, and congratulations.

See you tonight for a sweet rage.

LATE!

Scotty
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Sam,

Maureen's article will be OK. Stinson can take a look at the final version on
Monday.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           10/18/2000 06:37 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Newsletter, Monday 23 Oct.

Vince,

I see that you are flying around a lot this week, but I wanted to let you
know how it's going with the newsletter.  I've scheduled Steve Bigelow as the
"person of the week."  Regarding Technical Corner, I sent you a copy of
Maureen's article for your review.  Bob Lee told me he has also sent you
something.  I'd appreciate your guidance on which one to use.  I believe
Maureen's is time-sensitive, so I'd vote for that one if you've had a chance
to look it over.

I'm going to be out of town the rest of today and Thursday-Friday to attend
my uncle's funeral in Illinois.  If you fly over Illinois, please wave! :-)

Have a safe trip(s),

Sam


Please find attached the EEOS / NEPCO weekly project update for week ending November 23, 2001.

If you have any questions, you can call me at (713) 646-6106.

Mark


sounds good - i will make the reservations for sat.  is 7 o'clock ok?

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Bass [mailto:lwbthemarine@alltel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:00 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Cc: K. Bass
Subject: Re: Dinner

Let's do Sat. night, if okay with you.-Dad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bass, Eric" <Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>
To: "Dad (E-mail)" <lwbthemarine@alltel.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Dinner

Any news?  Which night do you want to get together?

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I don't think this agreement  will be on the agenda until next week.

If things change (moving up or back), I'll let you know.

Thanks,

Kay

Christi L Nicolay@ECT
08/01/2000 09:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO's form interconnection agreement

I will review this.  What is your time frame please?  Thanks.

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           07/31/2000 09:49 AM

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO's form interconnection agreement

Attached is the form interconnection agreement provided by Virgina Power, for
your information, review, etc. It is a new form which is currently under
review by VEPCO.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/07/99 03:00
PM ---------------------------
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: mdoucett@ei.enron.com
Subject: Re: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: etc.enron.com: no
data  known)

Mark:

let me try again:

FPL


thanks Ray

Delainey


Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-09738     Eff Date: 2001-10-28

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                    51,479                51,479
Working                      51,479                51,479
Capacity Allocation          40,671  CCR           40,671
Confirmed                    40,671                40,671


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022721.txt


Please find attached a 3rd draft of the Joint Stipulation of Issues.  It attempts to reflect the comments of about 20 of the TFG's participants.

No one has requested a conference call.

Please keep in mind this is a DRAFT that will be circulated to all parties to EL01-10 tomorrow.  It will no doubt be subject to further negotiation.  While it is highly unlikely that all the parties will reach agreement on a Joint Stipulation by the due date on the procedural schedule(i.e., Thursday, August 16), we nevertheless should make an effort to get it out to the other parties as early as possible tomorrow.

Accordingly, please propose only those additional revisions that you feel are critical at this time.  If I have not heard from you by 10:00 a.m. EDT tomorrow, August 15, I will go ahead and serve the other parties with the document conspicuously marked "DRAFT".

(Don't you hate this process?)

Regards,

Patricia Fry Godley
Van Ness Feldman
(202) 298-1940

 - VANDOC_106417_2.DOC


Please join me on Thursday, January 11 from 1:00 to 4:00 pm for a special
information session for the Operations Management teams supporting Enron
Americas, Enron Global Markets and Enron Industrial Markets.   We will focus
on assessing, managing and mitigating operational risk.  Details on the
location for the meeting will be sent to you early next week.

I look forward to seeing everyone at this meeting on the 11th.  The things
that we will discuss will be important for each and every one of you as you
carry out your roles in 2001.  I hope that you will make every effort to
attend.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you have a conflict that
will keep you from attending the meeting.


Ina:
Can you get a small drink refrigerator for the office stocked with:
Water (lots)
Diet Coke
Coke
Dr. Pepper
Diet Pepsi
Various Fruit Drinks

Thanks,
John


Thanks, same to you.

I was not here on the day so this is late but best wishes.

Kathy M Lynn
01/25/2001 04:50 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Happy Birthday

Happy Birthday! Please tell everyone that you are 29 so you don't blow my
cover since we were born on the same day! Hope you have a great birthday.


In order to explain who WECC is, I must lay a little historical background.  If you will recall, when EPAct'92 was passed, the usual view was that FERC could order wheeling, but only on a case by case basis.  There had been an effort to include an RTG provision in the bill, but it died when the conference committee was finalizing the bill.  There was a view by many in the West at the time, that it would still be better to move ahead with self-implementation of open access rather than waiting for litigation.  In the summer of 1994, first WRTA (Western Regional Transmission Assocation) then SWRTA (Southwestern Regional Transmission Association) and NRTA (Northwest Regional Transmission Association) were filed.  They were developed in an open process that included, perhaps for the first time, the transmission owners, the transmission dependent utilities, new market entrants and state regulators.  The IPPs and Marketers were participants, including Enron, Electric Clearing House (now Dynegy), DesTec, CalPine, Tenaska, etc.  FERC responded in November telling WRTA that it would have to accept comparable transmission access.  Instead of collapsing as predicted by the "just say no" crowd, the members accepted the conditions and accepted those conditions.  WRTA formed in June of 1995.

While the RTGs appear rather tame today, at the time they challenged the traditional view, offering to provide open access tariffs.  When the FERC issued the NOPR that gave us Orders 888/889 just prior to WRTAs formation, the participants in the three Western RTGs members responded during the summer of 1995 by working together to develop the key concepts of what became OASIS.  With the filing of the current OATTs, much of the ground breaking work of the RTGs was done, but they remained a forum for discussion of the interface between commercial and reliablity.  A common planning data base was developed in which included non-traditional participants and their ideas to be included.  The Western Market Interface Committee (WMIC) was organized by the RTGs and has had a continuing role in bringing the the three (soon to be two?) RTOs proposals together.

When the Western RTGs were organized in 1995 they were formed outside of WSCC.  WSCC had a very restrictive policy, allowing only utilities to be members.  When they grudgingly allowed IPPs to join, it was still by half-measures.  For instance, WSCC would allow only employees of the member to attend, so new, small members could not employ a consultant for joint representation.  When the RTG discussions were underway, the good old boys wanted it inside WSCC with the same kinds of restrictions.  We broke that mold, formed separately and then through the FERC order approving WRTA force WSCC to open its membership fully or to face the creating of a separate planning organization.  The change passed by one vote, but the change occured.

Once all the organizations were up and running (WSCC, WRTA, NRTA, SWRTA) it was obvious that there was substantial duplication of meetings and functions.   Serions talks of a merger began in about 1998.  They went very slowly, but finally produced a common organization to be called the Western Electric Coordinating Council (WECC), which would merge WSCC, WRTA and SWRTA together initially.  NRTA will likely vote to merge as well.  WECC is a RRG as far as NERC is concerned.

While the new bylaws do not go as far as I would have liked, they do further open up the WSCC process and provide for some consideration of the commercial impact of reliablity rules.  Is this a transitional phase? Perhaps.  Does it go as far as the EISB proposal?  No, but I see no reason to play "smash-em, bash-em" will every effort that hasn't followed the latest turn in our thinking.  As I hope this memo shows, we have been evolving the industry, never as fast as Enron or others (myself included) have wanted it to change.  The WECC will reconsititue the WSCC board under new membership rules and opens the possiblity of changing the entrenched senior staff as WSCC to breath some life into the organization.  At a minimum, the change from WSCC/WRTA/SWRTA/NRTA to WECC will provide interim improvement while the debate over EISB works its way to a conclusion and further change takes place.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Yeung, Charles
Sent: Fri 9/28/2001 8:26 AM
To: Shelk, John; Novosel, Sarah
Cc: Robertson, Linda; Nersesian, Carin; Walton, Steve; Perrino, Dave; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject: RE: WECC

This is the first I have heard of WECC.  I assume it is a "Western" NERC -type organization?

 I understand that the traders in the West are not too concerned about forming single standards applicable to both the East and West.  They would however, like to see more consistency in practices between TPs within the West itself.  Sounds like WECC may be able to do this. One of the big problems with the WSCC has been that it was not as stringent in dictating operating requirements on its members as the East has tried to be.   At NERC, WSCC members have always argued deference to the West due to system differences.  Unfortunately deference to the West has meant little to no standardization in the West over many transmission access practices, leaving it up to the sub-regions or individual TPs to decide.  I am not saying they are not technically justified, but there has been no incentive to bring about more consistent practices.

Is WECC consistent with EISB?  It depends, if WECC is sovereign over any other organization for standards approval, then I would say no.  I think WECC should be subject to the EISB process and have to get standards approved through EISB as well.  The problem is that EISB is voluntary and if WECC can go directly to FERC, then it becomes effectively the same as "deference to the West" -type language we have been fighting against.

So my verdict on WECC depends.....
As I noted in an earlier note, I believe there are those pushing for NERC to continue doing "reliability-only" and establish a contractual relationship to coordinate with EISB.  The WECC could take the same approach.  If this scenario plays out, I believe customers will leave NERC and put their money into EISB.  We must then work towards making NERC merely a transmission operators' advocacy group ( i.e. EEI is transmission owners advocacy group).  They can exist to focus on reliability - but have no direct standards setting authority.  They must be a member of EISB and participate as a member in one of the market sectors.

If anyone has any more info on WECC, please share it.

Charles Yeung
713-853-0348

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Shelk, John
Sent:   Friday, September 28, 2001 7:05 AM
To:     Novosel, Sarah; Yeung, Charles
Cc:     Robertson, Linda; Nersesian, Carin
Subject:        WECC

What do we think of FERC's approval of the new WECC this week?  As I understand it from the trade press, this new group is a merger of the WSCC and two other groups.  The new entity will handle reliability for RTOs, etc. and others in the West.  Is this consistent with our views on reliablity, EISB, etc.?

Thanks.


Guys,

We need a Confidentiality Agreement with these guys.  Pls. call Julie Ferrara
(3-4890) or myself if you need any more info.

AccuWeather, Inc.
385 Science Park Rd.
State College, PA  16803

Contract Administrator   Leisa Byron

Rahil
3-3206


Mike, lets discuss just after Wayne and I get together to discuss the
technical book or in conjunction.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
06:25 PM ---------------------------

Mike Coleman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/15/2000 03:12 PM
To: ddelain2@ect.enron.com, Dave Parquet
cc: Wayne Mays
Subject: Planning for Technical Support Requirements

Dave and Dave,

Wayne Mays and I are trying to assess technical support requirements for the
next 12-24 months.  We would like to talk with each of you to get you input
on the direction the company is going, and what type and level of support is
likely to be required as we go forward.

If possible, we'd like to schedule a brief (30 minute) conference call,
preferably within the next week, with each of you to discuss these issues.
If you have a time that would be convenient, please let me and/or Wayne know
so that we can get it scheduled.

Thanks!

Mike Coleman


Attached is you ercot digital certificate.

The portal is located at the following web site  https://mockmarket.ercot.com

I have a copy of your certificate if you require another copy or changes
required.

I have selected all areas except for market switching.


OK thanks.  I'll presume its dead until I hear otherwise.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
11:26 AM ---------------------------

Mark C Austin@ENRON
01/12/2001 11:13 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharon Smith/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Agnew/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: December New Deals Request

Darron,

Per our earlier conversation, the following is a list of new deals that we
have identified for further testing.  At your earliest convenience, could you
please provide the applicable deal ticket and forwards details for these two
deals?  Please let me know if you have any further questions or comments.

Thank You,

Mark Austin
ext. 68680


What should I tell him?
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcus Eller [mailto:meller@csu.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:37 PM
To: Harrison, Tyrell
Subject: gas contract

Tyrell, what is the status of our gas contract?

Marcus


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

Melissa Rodriguez
03/28/2000 10:03 AM
To: gonzalez316@hotmail.com, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: FRIENDS

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
09:58 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Joe Gonzalez" <gonzalez316@hotmail.com>
03/28/2000 09:45 AM

To: LMeza@Gatewayhomes.com, CDGonzalez316@AOL.Com, reba4982@aol.com,
ggarza@bcm.tmc.edu, vbabelen@netscape.net, mrodrig3@enron.com,
Ana.Guzman@coachusa.com, udydz@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: FRIENDS

>From: Elizabeth Meza <lmeza@gatewayhomes.com>
>To: Avis Bellard <abellard@gatewayhomes.com>, 'Carmen'
><lowgmc90@yahoo.com>, 'Diana' <dvalenz@tmh.tmc.edu>, 'Henny'
><marquez@tvpromofl.com>, "'Joe G.'" <gonzalez316@hotmail.com>, 'Lisa'
><mariavalenzuela@bankunited.com>, 'Lorena' <masterlore@aol.com>, 'Pat'
><pbarboza@bcm.tmc.edu>, 'Sonia' <sonia@getamco.com >, Tiffanny Webb
><twebb@gatewayhomes.com>
>Subject: FW: FRIENDS
>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:36:46 -0600
>
>No need to send it back I know you all care!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Avis Bellard
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9:31 AM
>To: Alma Guzman; Elizabeth Meza; Karen Luce; Tiffanny Webb; Susan Gilliam
>Subject: FW: FRIENDS
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karen Luce
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9:08 AM
>To: Aimee Brash (E-mail); Aundrea (E-mail); MICHELLE ROSS (E-mail); Vickie
>Colavito (E-mail); Kathy Hayes; Avis Bellard
>Subject: FW: FRIENDS
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathy Hayes
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9:04 AM
>To: 'TONI@TRANSOCEANIC.COM'; Susan Gilliam; Brigitte Bowman; Michelle
>Glover; Karen Luce; Alma Guzman; Arturo Vasquez Jr.
>Subject: FW: FRIENDS
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: toni@transoceanic.com [mailto:toni@transoceanic.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9:04 AM
>To: denisej@transoceanic.com; deniseb@transoceanic.com;
>vickie@transoceanic.com; maryd@transoceanic.com; rebecca@transoceanic.com;
>jacky@transoceanic.com; sandy@transoceanic.com; dedee@transoceanic.com;
>jayi@transoceanic.com; barb@transoceanic.com; kim@transoceanic.com;
>marys@transoceanic.com; theresa@transoceanic.com; maryw@transoceanic.com;
>Gina.M.Koveleskie@pahou.panmail.com; Kathy Hayes; KAArdh@aol.com;
>kimanne@dellnet.com; mdfergusonrdh@dellnet.com
>Subject: FW: FRIENDS
>Subject:FRIENDS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I HOPE I GET THIS BACK
>I believe that without a friend you are missing out on a lot!!!
>  Don't be confused by friends and acquaintances,
>  there is a difference!
>  Because I care about you,
>It's national care week . . .
>and you get to send
>  messages to all your friends
>   telling them that you
>  care about them and make them
>feel good about
>  themselves and if they write back . . .
>   (just once)
>  then that means that they care
>   about you too.
>  BUT, you have to send it right now!!
>  Send it to everyone you care about and
>if they send
>  it back . . . that means they care too. . .
>  but don't just send it back,
>send it on to everyone..
>  Have a nice day, and I'm glad we are friends!!!
>THIS IS A ROSE OF FRIENDSHIP YOU MUST
>  PASS IT TO AT LEAST 4 FRIENDS!!!
>  GO!
>  @}-----}------
>
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - image001.jpg
 - image002.gif


Please respond to Ben.  He will co-ordinate answers.

Thanks,

Don
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 09:29 PM
---------------------------

nkplagens@duke-energy.com on 12/07/2000 05:57:05 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: ecallaway@wallerlaw.com, rmartineau@wallerlaw.com, lnettles@velaw.com,
tfisher@brunini.com, jpsynnott@duke-energy.com
Subject: Additional requests for Caledonia and Brownsville sites

Don, I would like to requests the following additional information on the
Caledonia and Brownsville sites.

Caledonia

   Copy of SO2 allowances for 2000 and 2001.  Are these allowances
   transferrable?
   SPCC plan
   Emergency Response Plan
   CEMS QA/AC Plan
   CEMS Certification Test Report
   Copy of monthly log of fuel heat content, fuel usage, & total heat input
   per air permit for 1999 and 2000
   Copy of annual emissions reports (or similar)as required
   Any water supply agreements with local utilities.
   Copies of CEMS daily reports with all NOx, fuel, and MW values for each
   turbine for one operating day for the months of June, July, August,
   September and one winter or shoulder month.

Brownsville

   Copy of SO2 allowances for 2000 and 2001.  Are these allowances
   transferrable?
   Copies of CEMS daily reports with all NOx, fuel, and MW values for each
   turbine for one operating day for the months of June, July, August,
   September and one winter or shoulder month.
   Copies of well reports, logs, and drawdown reports for the 2 water
   wells.
   Copies of any permits, certifications, approvals necessary to install
   and operate the wells.
   Provide the proposed plan to further address the nois issue at the site.
   Explain permit efforts, if any, for "condensate" at plant.


America West Airlines Weekend Surf'n Go
Wednesday, November 22, 2000

This is a post-only mailing. Please do not respond since messages will not be
read.

Due to the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, tickets must be purchased by
Thursday, November 23, 2000. Outbound travel must be Friday, November 24 with
return travel on Tuesday, November 28 or Wednesday, November 29, 2000

Current Fare Sales
******************************************************************************
*******
$99 Internet Fare Sale

Take advantage of $99 fares each way to many America West destinations when
you purchase your tickets by Friday, December 1, 2000 and travel between
Tuesday, November 28, 2000 and Wednesday, February 28, 2001. Travel
restrictions apply; visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp. For additional
information contact the americawest.com Internet Support Desk at
800-327-7810.

10% Off Fares to/from Canada

Purchase your tickets at americawest.com and receive an additional 10% off
when you travel to/from Vancouver and Toronto, Canada. Purchase your tickets
by Sunday, November 26, 2000 and travel between Monday, November 27, 2000 and
Wednesday, February 28, 2001. Visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp for details.

Free Stopovers in Las Vegas

We're adding some excitement for our cross-country travelers - a free
stopover in Las Vegas. When you connect through Las Vegas we will waive our
normal $60 stopover fee. Visit
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_faresales.asp for details.

Special Offers
******************************************************************************
*******
America West Gift Certificates

Wrap up the holidays with the gift of travel from America West. Available in
$25, $50 and $100 denominations, America West gift certificates can be used
to purchase America West tickets or an America West Vacations package. Simply
visit http://www.americawest.com/giftcertificate.htm

to place your order.? Holiday gift shopping has never been easier!

Weekend Surf'n Go
******************************************************************************
*******
To purchase a weekend Surf'n Go special fare, go to
http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_emailfares-e.asp

Round trip coach fares for travel between:

$79 ??? Albuquerque, NM? - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Austin, TX? - Phoenix, AZ
$149 ?? Austin, TX? - Portland, OR
$199 ?? Baltimore, MD - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Denver, CO? - Orange/Santa Ana, CA
$69 ??? Las Vegas, NV? - Los Angeles, CA
$69 ??? Las Vegas, NV? - Phoenix, AZ
$69 ??? Los Angeles, CA? - Las Vegas, NV
$79 ??? Los Angeles, CA? - Tucson, AZ
$69 ??? Ontario, CA - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Orange/Santa Ana, CA - Denver, CO
$79 ??? Orange/Santa Ana, CA - Phoenix, AZ
$79???? Phoenix, AZ - Albuquerque, NM
$139 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Austin, TX
$199 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Baltimore, MD
$69???? Phoenix, AZ? - Las Vegas, NV
$69???? Phoenix, AZ? - Ontario, CA
$79 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - Orange/Santa Ana, CA
$139??? Phoenix, AZ? - Portland, OR
$99 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - San Francisco, CA
$99 ??? Phoenix, AZ? - San Jose, CA
$139 ?? Phoenix, AZ? - Spokane, WA
$149??? Portland, OR? - Austin, TX
$139??? Portland, OR? - Phoenix, AZ?
$99???? San Francisco, CA? - Phoenix, AZ
$99 ??? San Jose, CA? - Phoenix, AZ
$139 ?? Spokane, WA - Phoenix, AZ
$79 ??? Tucson, AZ? - Los Angeles, CA

Terms and Conditions:

Purchase Ticket By:? Thursday, 11/23/00, 9:00pm PDT
Travel Outbound:? Friday, 11/24/00?
Travel Return:? Tuesday, 11/28/00 or Wednesday, 11/29/00
Travel On:? Flights operated by America West and America West Express
Purchased Through:? americawest.com
Ticket Refundability:? Non-refundable
Itinerary Changes:? Subject to seat availability, $75 change fee, and
difference in fare if applicable
Minimum Stay:? 2 nights
Black Out Dates:? None
Routing:? Round trip only, Routing restrictions may apply
Other Discounts:? Not combinable with any other discount
Seat Inventory:? Limited - subject to availability
Federal Excise Tax:? $2.50 per flight segment through December 31, 2000.
$2.75 per flight segment effective January 1, 2001.? A flight segment is
defined as a take off and landing

Passenger Facility Charges:? Up to $20 per person, depending on itinerary

America West Vacations
******************************************************************************
*******
Book your vacation online http://www.americawestvacations.com/

These rates are effective for stay Friday, November 24 through Tuesday,
November 28, 2000 and do not include airfare.

$276/four nights*?????? Las Vegas, NV - Circus Circus, Las Vegas, NV

Book online or call America West Vacations at 1-800-356-6611 for details.

Terms and Conditions

*Rates quoted are per person, based on double occupancy, and may not apply to
groups or during holiday/convention dates as specified by individual hotels.?
Terms & Conditions apply. Prices and offers are capacity controlled and
subject to change; availability is limited. , 2000 The Leisure Company.? CST
2043556-20

???????

Hilton Hotel Specials
******************************************************************************
*******
These room rates are effective November 24 through 27, 2000

$49/Night?????? Albuquerque, NM - Doubletree Albuquerque, Albuquerque NM

$199/Night????? Austin, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites Austin, Austin TX

$89/Night?????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Glendale, Glendale CA

$109/Night????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Torrance/South Bay, Torrance CA

$119/Night ???? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport,
Irvine CA

$89/Night?????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San
Pedro CA

$67/Night ????? Los Angeles, CA? - Hilton Whittier, Whittier CA

$119/Night ???? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport,
Irvine CA

$67/Night ????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Whittier, Whittier CA

$69/Night?????? Phoenix, AZ? - Doubletree Guest Suites Phoenix Gateway
Center, Phoenix AZ

$79/Night ????? Phoenix, AZ? - Doubletree Scottsdale Paradise Valley,
Scottsdale AZ

$119/Night????? Phoenix, AZ? - Hilton Mesa Pavilion, Mesa AZ

$68/Night?????? Portland, OR? - Hilton Garden Inn Portland/Lake Oswego, Lake
Oswego OR

$87/Night ????? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Concord, Concord CA

$119/Night ???? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco Airport
North, San Francisco CA

$89/Night ????? San Francisco, CA? - Doubletree Modesto, Modesto CA

$199/Night????? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View,
Mountain View CA

$189/Night ???? San Francisco, CA? - Hilton San Jose and Towers, San Jose CA

$89/Night ????? San Jose, CA? - Doubletree Modesto, Modesto CA

$199/Night????? San Jose, CA? - Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View, Mountain
View CA

$129/Night????? San Jose, CA? - Hilton Newark/Fremont, Newark CA

$189/Night ???? San Jose, CA? - Hilton San Jose and Towers,
San Jose CA

$69/Night?????? Spokane, WA? - Doubletree Spokane City Center, Spokane WA

These room rates are effective November 24 through 28, 2000

$109/Night ???? Baltimore, MD? - Hilton Washington Embassy Row, Washington DC

$54/Night ????? Denver, CO? - Doubletree Hotel Denver? - Southeast, Aurora CO

$75/Night ????? Los Angeles, CA? - Doubletree Anaheim/Orange County, Orange
CA

$75/Night?????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Doubletree Anaheim/Orange County,
Orange CA

$89/Night ????? Orange/Santa Ana, CA? - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro,
San Pedro CA

$59/Night ????? Tucson, AZ? - Doubletree Guest Suites Tucson, Tucson AZ

To book this week's Hilton "Family" Value Rates, visit
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values_main.html. Check online for specific

dates for each hotel location or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for "Value
Rates."

Terms and Conditions:

Value Rates are available only during the specific week in which they are
published via the America West Surf'n Go Internet site and www.hilton.com.
Limited availability; rooms at these Value Rates are sold on a first-come,
first-served basis. Availability, rate, and terms of occupancy are not
guaranteed and will be confirmed at time of reservation. Participating hotels,

rates and terms are subject to change without notice. Single or double
occupancy.? Early check-in, late check-out subject to availability. No extra
charge for children when they stay in parents' or grandparents' room; total
room occupancy subject to local fire safety regulations and other applicable
laws or regulations. Rates vary by season, do not include any other fees or
charges,

including without limitation state or local taxes or gratuities and are
subject to change without notice.? Advance booking required.? One night's
nonrefundable deposit is required at time of booking. Offer cannot be
combined with any other special discounts, coupons, certificates, special
rates, promotional offers, award stays, or meeting/group stays. Hilton
reserves the right to cancel any Value Rate at any time without notice.
Hilton is not responsible for the terms

of other offers in the program, or for any electronic, computer, telephone,
security, virus or any other problem or damage related to use of the program
or its offers.

To change your e-mail address or to subscribe/unsubscribe to this weekly
mailing, please visit? http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_subscribe.asp .


See attached:

Loss/Limit Notifications:

None

 - DPR 21.xls
 - Power Report 21.xls
 - Gas Report 21.xls


FYI
----- Forwarded by Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications on 07/07/00 08:54 AM -----

	Michelle Hicks
	07/07/00 08:38 AM

		 To: Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Master BWT Agreement

fyi
----- Forwarded by Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications on 07/07/00 08:45 AM
-----

	JNatori@tokyo.whitecase.com
	07/07/00 02:49 AM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
MSuzuki@tokyo.whitecase.com
		 Subject: Re: Master BWT Agreement

Michelle,

I discussed the corporate authorization issue with Mika Suzuki, a Japanese
lawyer in our office.

1.  Basically, we believe that Japanese corporations can enter into the
Master Bandwidth Purchase and Sale Agreement.

     A.  There is no specific internal authorization required in Japanese
corporate law and practice, unless the transaction is considered
"important."  Obviously, the question of what is "important" is relative.

     B.  Generally, larger companies have internal directors' rules that
specify a monetary amount above which transactions must be subject to board
approval.  Outsiders are usually not privy to that information and, having no
notice thereof, are not prejudiced by failure of the company to follow its
own internal approval procedures.  There is case law to support that notion
with regard to the claims of innocent contract counter parties.

     C.  However, if the counter party has notice that board approval is
required, but has not been obtained, or the counter party is "negligent"
(like a constructive notice type of situation) the counter party will not
have the benefit of any lack of authority argument or defense.

     D.  We note that the draft Master Agreement provides a representation
and warranty regarding due authorization in Section 10.(a)(iv).  Although not
determinative, this provision should be considered by a Japanese court.

     E.  As the execution of the Master Agreement does not involve a specific
transaction and transaction amount, it is unlikely that it would fall into
this "important" matter category requiring board approval.  However, the
transactions will have to be judged on a case-by-case basis.

2.  A.  In the BWT context, if the bandwidth purchaser is not going to use
the bandwidth itself (i.e., the purchaser plans to re-sell the bandwidth),
the purchaser will have to be licensed as a telecommunications carrier under
the Telecommunications Business Law of Japan (the "TBL").

     B.  In order to be licensed as a telecommunications carrier, the general
rule is that the registered business purpose of the corporation must specify
that its business purpose is to carry on telecommunications business.
(Please see the corporate register of the Applications YK and Network YK for
examples of this.)  We note that the draft Master Agreement provides a
representation and warranty regarding licensing in Section 10.(a)(iii).

     C.  Basically, a violation of the licensing requirement should not
affect the validity of the contract, but simply result in the bandwidth
trader becoming subject to the penal provisions of the TBL.  However, one
should keep in mind that the intention of the TBL is to protect the public
good and, to the extent that disregard of its licensing requirements in
connection with BWT might be considered a threat to or undermining of the
integrity of the telecommunications system, broader regulatory action may be
a possibility.  In that regard, an action for specific performance of a
bandwidth delivery obligation by the unlicensed trader may be problematic.

We hope this answers your initial question.

Best regards.

Jeff

>>> <Michelle_Hicks@enron.net> 06/27/00 05:28AM >>>

Jeff,  Here is the latest version of the Master Agreement.  The scope of the
review at this time is limited to whether Japanese companies are authorized to
enter into such an agreement.  I will let you know when or if the traders are
interested in having the form reviewed from a Japanese law perspective.
Please
let me or Cynthia know if you have any questions or comments.  Best regards,
Michelle
----- Forwarded by Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications on 06/26/00 03:34
PM
-----
|--------+------------------------>
|        |          Marie Heard   |
|        |                        |
|        |          06/26/00 03:17|
|        |          PM            |
|        |                        |
|--------+------------------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |      To:     Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications      |
  |
cc:                                                                   |
  |      Subject:     Re: Master BWT Agreement(Document link not
converted)    |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

                         (See attached file: samplembpsa.pdf)
 - TEXT.htm


All requested changes to points in the production PLE system must be sent to the PLE group by a TW business user (Facility Planning/Gas Control for physical points, Marketing for non-physical) via email in order for us to make the changes.  We cannot make changes to points based on testing defects.

If you have any questions please let me know.

Thanks

Linda