NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: ANNE SKAMAROCK
on STORAGE
10/23/01 - Today's focus: News from Storage Networking World

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* A closer look at announcements from Compaq and Brocade
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
How will LAN/MAN Technologies Disrupt the Status Quo?

LAN/MAN industry leaders have one question for you: Do you want
to fall behind? Even with a shrinking LAN/MAN budget, you can
still make the changes and updates you need to stay ahead.
Find out how at Network World's FREE Town Meeting, State of the
LAN/MAN: Embracing Disruptive Technologies.  Register today at
http://nww1.com/go/1022lan.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: News from Storage Networking World

By Anne Skamarock

As Storage Networking World gets underway this week in Orlando,
Florida, my e-mail has been overflowing with press
announcements from the conference. Among some of the more
interesting news is Compaq's introduction of two network
storage products and Brocade's launch of a 16-port switch.

Not one to sit still for long in the storage market, Compaq has
unveiled Universal Storage and the Enterprise Virtual Array
(EVA), the first product to incorporate the vendor's VersaStore
technology. EVA allows users to aggregate storage into
multiple, virtual pools that can be expanded in real-time.

EVA allows customers to define the data protection requirements
for each of the virtual pools on a pool-by-pool basis.
Traditionally, once the data protection, or Redundant Array of
Inexpensive Disks (RAID) level is set for a disk subsystem,
that protection must be used throughout. The V-RAID (Virtual
RAID) capability in the EVA allows the protection level to be
specified for each pool.

Included in the EVA is the ability to produce snapshot copies
of your data. EVA supports the traditional "Snap" capability
whereby storage space is pre-allocated to create the copy. The
technology also supports V-Snap, which uses space as updates
are made to the data. Finally, EVA supports what Compaq calls
"Snapclones." Snapclones are similar to traditional snapshots
however, instead of having to wait for all the data to be
copied, applications can access the Snapclone immediately after
the Snapclone call. This makes performing backups of changing
data significantly easier and faster.

Compaq's other announcement, Universal Storage, is not a new
concept as EMC is offering the functionality too. Very simply,
Universal Storage allows customers to manage all their storage
in a storage-area network (SAN), whether the data is being
accessed directly by an application via block-level transfers
through a server, or by a network-attached storage appliance
connected to both the local network and the SAN. As with the
EVA, Universal Storage gives customers flexibility in managing
their current storage resources as well as scalability when
more storage resources are required.

Finally on the storage-networking front, Brocade announced a
16-port switch, the Silkworm 3800. The 3800 brings together
Brocade's third generation ASIC technology that supports 2G
bit/sec speeds, as well as new Advanced Fabric Services. The
fabric services include hardware enforced zoning for greater
security; inter-switch trunking for greater performance and
reliability; plus improved performance and health monitoring.
The latest version of Brocade's API is available for storage
management software vendors.

There are many, many more announcements that came across my
desk this week and I could write about them for days. However,
I found these especially interesting.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Anne Skamarock:

Anne Skamarock is an analyst with Enterprise Management
Associates (http://www.enterprisemanagement.com).  She has
worked with networked storage for the last 15 years and is
currently focused on the storage practice within EMA. She
can be reached at mailto:askamarock@enterprisemanagement.com
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Compaq
http://www.compaq.com

Brocade
http://www.brocade.com

Storage Networking World
http://www.storagenetworkingworld.com/orlando_2001/
_______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's Net.Worker site

Whether your company is growing larger or scaling back,
corporate managers are looking for ways to cut costs while
retaining and recruiting star employees. One smart solution -
at least on paper - is to let some employees work from home.
Network World's Net.Worker Web site bridges the gap between the
telework concept and the hardware, software and services needed
to make it happen. We bring you news and reviews, sound advice
and keen insight into the technologies and solutions you need
to manage a remote and mobile workforce.

Visit http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


MEETING NOTICE

Cal-ISO Market Participants and SDG&E Stakeholders:

A Cal-ISO Stakeholder meeting will be held in San Diego on Wednesday August
23, 2000 to discuss the preliminary study results of SDG&E's annual
five-year transmission expansion plan and detailed studies being conducted
for the Valley-Rainbow 500 kV Project.   The meeting will be held at:

   Sempra Energy Corporate Headquarters
    Auditorium 3
    101 Ash Street (corner of First Ave & Ash St)
     San Diego, California 92101
    9:30 AM to 2:30 PM
    Lunch will be provided.

For more information on this subject please refer to the ISO web site at
www.caiso.com. Documents pertaining to the 2000 SDG&E Transmission Expansion
Plan are located at:

http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/02/28/2000022816421912528.html

A map showing directions to Sempra Energy's office location from the airport
is available upon request.  If you plan to attend this meeting, please RSVP
to Dave Miller at the telephone number or E-mail address shown below by
Wednesday August 16, 2000.

    David M. Miller, Jr.
   Telephone (858) 654-8623
   E-mail dmmiller@sdge.com
   Fax (858) 654-8636

If you have questions regarding the meeting arrangements, please contact
David Miller.
If you have questions regarding the studies, please contact Steve Mavis at
916-351-2112 or smavis@caiso.com.

Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations
916-608-7055
DFuller@caiso.com


I have not received this back yet.  I will call Ken today.

	Joan Quick
	11/28/2000 04:27 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENA and Crescendo Agency Agreement

did you ever get this back from ken?

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 04:27 PM
---------------------------
From: Joan Quick on 11/09/2000 04:16 PM
To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, kckrisa@apex2000.net, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Castiglione/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron (bcc: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT)
Subject: ENA and Crescendo Agency Agreement

This is the draft of the Agency Agreement between ENA and Crescendo.  I will
have Gerald fill out the notices section with information re Stacy.  Please
look over and  let me know by Monday at noon if you have any changes.

Thanks.
joan

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 03:55 PM
---------------------------
From: Gerald Nemec on 11/09/2000 03:02 PM
To: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Sorry for the delay.  Please review the attached draft.  If it looks OK we
can send to Ken for execution.

	Joan Quick
	11/09/2000 01:38 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

hi gerald,  where do we stand in getting that agency agreement between ENA
and crescendo?

thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
04:09 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
04/11/2001 02:37 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TW transportation index hedges entered into 1/2001

More Deals.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
02:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan Fancler @ ENRON                           04/11/2001 02:33 PM

To: Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vincent Strohmeyer/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Roger G
Leworthy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron
Subject: TW transportation index hedges entered into 1/2001

Thanks for your assistance and that of Jeff.   In addition to the 8 trades
sent yesterday (see below), which Jeff is assisting on the offsetting
positions, we have another done on March 7, 2001  ticket # QV8401.1, please
add it to the list.

At year end Ron Baker worked with your group to document the offsetting third
party positions on the following trades.

NI8156.1
NK4742.1
NT6154.1
NV5358.1

I understand that as a result of that work about 97 third party trades were
identified to offset these 4 Transwestern trades.  Somehow an effectiveness
test was done.  We were not involved in any of that work and I hope all 97
trades (If that is the correct number) are still on ENA's books and are still
effective.  At this time I don't see how I can measure effectiveness without
the third party positions in our books.  Can ENA met the effectiveness
standard and measurement requirements of SFAS 133 or is it the responsibility
of the business unit that originated the hedge.  At this time we are only
measuring our own positions.   Roger, indicated in the below memo that Ernie
was going to do the effectiveness testing.

We need your advice on if we should continue hedging positions with ENA.  I
am concerned that ETS does not have the ability to monitor and maintain
effectiveness when ENA facilitates the transaction because ETS loses control
of the offseting 3rd party position.   I was under the impression that
intercompany trades were kept in an affiliate book.  Perhaps we can get
together next week and work out documentation procedures and the use of the
affiliate book.  Anyday except Monday.

Thanks,  Dan

---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron on 04/11/2001
01:21 PM ---------------------------

Vincent Strohmeyer
04/10/2001 01:52 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW transportation index hedges entered into 1/2001

Jeff,

I hope you can help me with this.  I need to find a way to identify
offsetting 3rd party derivative transactions relating to the internal trades
done with TW for the following deals:

TW RMTC QL2915.1
TW RMTC QL2918.1

TW RMTC QL5424.1
TW RMTC QL5444.1

TW RMTC QL5357.1
TW RMTC QL5358.1

TW RMTC QL9270.1
TW RMTC QL9273.1

Tiffany Miller identified you as the person that did this for our deals with
ENA earlier.  Please let me know as soon as possible, if you can help.  If
not, do you have any suggestions?

Vince
713.853.6701

Roger G Leworthy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/10/2001 11:36 AM
To: Dan Fancler@Enron, Bob Chandler@ENRON
cc: Ron Baker/Enron@EnronXGate, Ernie de Lachica@Enron

Subject: TW transportation index hedges entered into 1/2001

Dan/Bob,
Following my voice mail message (to Dan), I want to circle back on the
accounting impact of the recent internal transportation derivatives between
TW and RMTC.

The concern that has arisen is that TW has taken the "out-of-the-money"
impact of these trades (approx. $27MM) to OCI while RMTC has marked the
"in-the-money" impact through income.

TW has taken its impact to OCI because it is, on a standalone accounts basis,
designating these internal trades in cash flow hedge relationships.

However, from an Enron consolidated financial position viewpoint, the
internal trades cannot be designated as hedges (and, thus, would need to be
reversed which would have a negative impact on earnings of $27MM).

So, in order not to have this negative impact, 3rd party "offset"
transactions in ENA must be identified and documented as cash flow hedge
transactions.

It may be that RMTC has already identified offsetting 3rd party derivative
transactions relating to the internal trades done with TW.

However, if not, we think that the best place for responsibility for getting
these 3rd party trades IDENTIFIED AND PROPERLY DOCUMENTED IN CASH FLOW HEDGE
RELATIONSHIPS is with the business unit that wanted the internal trade in the
first place - i.e. TW in this case.

If this has not already been done, can you have someone in your shop work
with ENA to identify and obtain copies of sufficient 3rd party trades that
hedge the risk hedged by TW. Once this is accomplished, Enron Corp.
consolidated hedge documentation needs to be established as a matter of
urgency; again, we consider this responsibility is best placed in the BU
using the internal trade as a hedge. In this regard, Ernie (effectiveness
testing) and I will be available to assist with this documentation.

Please do not hesitate to advise comments or questions on this matter. I am
preparing the FAS 133 impact 3/31 Pro-Formas based on the identification and
development of the consolidated hedge documentation.

Roger


Welcome to Enron!  You have joined an exciting company at a critical time in
the growth of our organization.  As a part of the Enron team, you will be at
the forefront of the ongoing evolution of our business.

Ours is a dynamic company and it is important for you to understand both the
breadth and the depth of the company you have just joined.  We believe that
"open communication" is critical to the company's ongoing success, as well as
to yours.  As an ongoing part of the New Hire Network, we invite you to
attend the corporate sponsored full day :"Enron at a Glance"  This program
builds upon the orientation you may have received your first day on the job.

Reserve the date!

Date:    Thursday, October 26, 2000
Time:    8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Continental Breakfast at 8:00 a.m.)
Location:   Hyatt Regency - Downtown (Imperial Ballroom)
  1200 Louisiana Street (lunch provided)
  (713)654-1234

You will learn about our various businesses, their products, services,
markets and strategies and how they fit together to make Enron unique in the
energy industry.  You will learn about our regulated and unregulated
businesses, our domestic and international markets, our competitive position
and our organization structure.

Members of the senior management team of the corporation will be there to
review these areas with you personally.  We will also talk about our culture
and values, what sets us apart from other companies in this area, what we
expect of employees and what we offer in return.

Your input is not only paramount, but greatly appreciated.  As new employees
we understand you have questions concerning the ongoing operations of the
various business units of Enron.  We want your questions answered!  Please
e-mail questions concerning the various business units to the following:
jdavis6@enron.com.  Our business unit leaders will address these questions
during our presentation.

Please register by leaving a voice mail message at (713) 853-7181.  In the
event you should have any questions, please call Jeff D. Davis at (713)
345-8908.

We look forward to seeing you on the 26th!


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 09:06 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	02/16/2001 02:17 PM

		 To: IEP <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: www.turnonthetruth.com

The IEP web-site is now on-line at www.turnonthetruth.com .-;please use it
as a resource.  Please note that all references to a retail rate freeze have
been removed.

Thanks,
Jean

----
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)


Guys,

During the RCR Meeting last Monday an RCR of $30 K (US) was approved for legal and consulting support in relation to the ATCO Affiliate Code of Conduct Application.  I was asked by the RCR Committee to summarize the issues we intended to pursue once we had completed a review of the filing.  Below is an email I sent to our lawyer, Harold Huber, instructing him on the areas I wanted him to focus on in his cross examination and argument.  I believe these are fundamental code areas/issues that are of interest to Enron's operations in Alberta/Canada and therefore we should proceed to have our counsel pursue these at the hearing as was envisioned with the RCR request and subsequent approval.  Please let me know if anyone disagrees with me on this.

Regards,

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemstock, Robert
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Harold. R. Huber (E-mail)
Cc:	Dave Vetsch (E-mail)
Subject:	Enron Position - ATCO Affiliate Code of Conduct Hearing

Harold,

I have consolidated the relevant documents you have been working with to prepare your cross into one email for ease of reference:

a) Power Budd Preliminary Report dated July 20, 1999;
b) The Enron Code/Atco Code Matrix;
c) The Power Budd Code/Atco Code Matrix.

For the purpose of confirming the instructions I provided to you, my interest is not to reduce your cross-examination to a word smithing exercise/negotiation with the ATCO witness but rather to put to the ATCO witness questions in specific areas that the ATCO Code has either addressed insufficiently or not addressed at all.  The very best possible result we could achieve would be for the Board to direct ATCO to refile a code that is consistent with the Power Budd Code with the exception that to the extent that ATCO does not incorporate a provision in the Power Budd Code it must provide the Board with an explanation as to why the provision was not included in the ATCO Code.

I recognize you have some concerns about putting the Power Budd Report on the record in the event ATCO can selectively use a portion of it to our detriment.  Based on my review of the Report, I think this risk is very small compared to the benefit of providing the Board with a comprehensive Report prepared by a consultant that was hired by the Alberta Government and consulted all affected parties in Alberta (including ATCO) prior to preparing the Report.  Therefore, I think you should try to get the Report placed into evidence. We can discuss this further if you disagree.

My sense is that the following areas of the proposed ATCO Code should be addressed in your cross-examination:

1) Applicability of the Code

The ATCO Code must apply to all affiliates, not just ATCO's unregulated affiliates as ATCO has a number of regulated businesses in Alberta, the regulated affiliates of the utility to which the code applies must govern this relationship also.  See Vanderveen Page 15.

2) Non-discrimination (see PB Report page 12)

The absence of any reference to this by ATCO in their code other than the one sentence in the Purpose section leaves the code significantly deficient.  Our key concern here is that the code makes it abundantly clear that a utility must not provide its affiliates with preferential treatment relative to its treatment of unaffiliated companies.  See Blanks in matrix and PB Report page 13.

3)   Separation  (see PB Report page 13)

a) Separate Corporate Entity - Each regulated ATCO utility and should be a separate corporate entity from its unregulated affiliates.  I believe they have done this in their reorganization so they should not oppose this requirement in the code.

b) Sharing of Facilities - Atco code is very brief and PB is preferable as it defines what cannot be shared.

c) Corporate Support - Clearly ATCO is advocating no restrictions on corporate oversight versus PB which talks about allowing it subject to some restrictions and emphasizes pricing rules.

d) Joint Purchases - Atco has no requirement respecting appropriate cost sharing relative to benefit or mention of certain products or services that are not appropriate to jointly acquire such as the energy commodity.

e) Separate Officers - a limit of 1/3 of Board of the utility should not also be members of unregulated affiliates is reasonable.

f) Sharing of Employees - Atco want to share those who don't have access to Confidential Info.  Enron/PB advocate no sharing.

g) Employee Movement - there should be a time limit (i.e. one year) on employees not being able to transfer back and forth between the utility and the affiliate.

h) Other Sharing Prohibitions - see PB Code 4.6 (c) - (g)

4) Transfer Pricing

The key point here is definition and application of "fair market value".  As per Enron Code, the onus should be on utility to prove product or service acquired at FMV.  See PB page 16.

5) Marketing and Advertising

Pursue the need for no joint marketing, equal access to written communication, clear rules on responses to customer requests for retailer information, provision of leads to affiliates.  See PB Report page 18.

6) Compliance Plan

Atco has no requirement for development of a plan or its contents.  See PB Report page 20.

7) Audit and Record Keeping

Atco has no audit requirements.  Atco should also be required to keep a complaints log and disclose the records it is required to keep to industry participants.  See PB Report page 21.

8) Enforcement and Penalties

ATCO Code has no provisions whatsoever under this category.  See PB Report page 22.

Regards,

Rob


Just wanted to thank you for your help with my pay check last week.  it was
greatly appreciated.  I am so tired. I didn't get to bed until 1am last night
and had to be here at 5:30.  YUCK!


We are looking for a copy of the agency agreements between ENA and CES, and ENA and CEM.  Would you be a sweetie and see if you have copies of the agencies in your files?  And if you do, please fax me a copy.

humbly yours
chris


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ashley Love" <alove@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	This weekend

Darron:

I just wanted to say "thanks" for joining us this  weekend in Auburn.  I hope you and Kristi had lots of fun.  Of course,  you are always welcome to go with us anytime you want.

It was AWLSOME!

Take it easy and keep an eye out for anybody with a  big black toe,
Ashley


Thanks Mark - my understanding however is that the long description with the
reference to COMEX will be viewable by Reuters users so does this change your
view or would we still be okay, given that the reference to COMEX is quite
benign (i.e. we have similar references in our long descriptions for IPE,
Platts etc.)?


Vince:

We will have cocktails with Andrew at Mi Luna in the Village (on
University, south side of the street between Kirby and Morningside) at 5:30
Monday evening.  You can join in there or meet up with the dinner crew at
the appointed place.

We'll see you Monday.

bbo


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   March 1, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Bridgeline Gas Marketing LLC

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Weather
          Pulp, Paper & Lumber
          Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   New York

Copies will be distributed

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Russell,

Because it covers swaps, a financial lawyer needs to look at it.  Even when
the primary exposure is physical.

Stacy

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/01/2001 07:46 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Randy Otto/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: Gulf Guarantee for Enron

Stacy,
Attached is a draft guaranty from Gulf Resources to cover physical
transactions between their sub, Crestar Energy Marketing and ENA.  Can you
please review this format and provide your comments.  The guaranty covers
purchase/sale and swap transactions, although our primary exposure is only
physical natural gas.  I am not sure if one of the financial attorney's needs
to look at this too

Thanks
Russell

**Randy, Take a look at the guaranty and the types of transactions we have
with this counterparty to understand the need for the guaranty.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rick_Miller@gulf.ca@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rick+5FMiller+40gulf+2Eca+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Diamond, Russell
Subject: Gulf Guarantee for Enron

Russell:

I understand from Jeff McPhail of our marketing group that Enron is looking
for
a parental guarantee from Gulf Canada for one of our subsidiaries - Crestar
Energy Marketing Corp.  (Jeff did not mention the subsidiary Enron was
requesting to have guaranteed).  I am enclosing a form of parental guarantee
that we have signed in the past.  Please review and call with any questions.

Thanks,

Rick Miller
Assistant Treasurer
403-233-3015

(See attached file: Enron Guarantee.doc)

******* End *******

 - Enron Guarantee.doc


fyi..
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           02/03/2000 01:12 PM

To: Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Opt 60 for 2/4

the OPT 60 contract has been restricted again for 2/4.  I spoke with TCO and
they explained that the notice was posted late (11:15am) due some internal
issue at TCO.  I normally check the notices early am and then again once
nominations has be scheduled.
wges  was=7314 now=0
hopewell was=25500 now=0
cgv1  was=209 now=0

I will need Emporia/Transco to deliver to Hopewell and any markets in oper 1.

thanks
joann


Tyrell, what is status of documents.

Call me on my cell phone. 713-302-6442.


Attached is a copy of my outline presented to IT and Deal Clearing.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Steve,

It appears as though the outside council opinion is no longer keeping us from completing the ISDA.  If you guys are ok with the current language, we can send you an executable copy and you guys can sign and send back with all of the documents that are required according to the ISDA.  We are prepared to provide you with our documents and will send them with the executable copies of the ISDA.

Call me when you get a chance and let me know what your status is.  I think Barry and I will be in So. California the 17th and 18th.  If you have some time, we would like to stop by and see you guys.  Just let me know when you are available.

Thanks,

Kim


----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 01:02 PM -----

	"barry a. weiss" <bawesq@earthlink.net>
	09/19/2000 12:44 PM

		 To: <sheila.tweed@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

As we discussed the following are the references  you can check as we move
along in the hiring process:
?
Keith Martin? Chadbourne & Parke?  202.974.5674
?
Larry Folks (bus unit head for Entergy units I  worked with) Newport
Generation?  949.475.9572????
?
Bill Ford (Entergy Aus bus unit head)? Newport  Generation? 949.622.6982
?
Mark Coleman 408 543 4841? gc Global  Center
?
I look forward to hearing from you
?
Regards
?
Barry???


Daren,

I am trying to make up the gas for ENA deals on meter 1552,8024,1062, (deals
240061, 378904, 394489, 487588).  Per Anita, these need to be kept whole.  I
have the option of a buyback or swing on 1373....but, there is not enough gas
at meter 1373 to do this.  Please let me know if there is another way I can
achieve this.

Thu
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 01:11
PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 12:36 PM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Daren's response.

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 12:36
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/14/2001 12:30 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

We have a buyback under HPL (#586534).  ENA had only 7,000/day scheduled at
mtr 1373 in Feb.  In reviewing the daily volumes in POPS, I didn't see any
days with flow under 18,000.  So, we should not need a buyback for ENA.  Any
shortages should be allocated to the HPL ticket.

D

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 11:03 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Daren - Thu has asked if I can extend deal 343421 thru Feb. '01.  I told her
I didn't have the authority to do this.  It is for Equistar.  It looks like
it is a term deal expiring Jan. '01.   She wants it added to keep the ENA
deal whole.  What do you suggest?

AL
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 10:58
AM ---------------------------
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Aimee,

This is the deal for Equistar.  There is not enough gas at meter 1373 to keep
the ENA deal whole.  I need this deal to create buyback.  This was out there
last month and Anita told me to get the deal extended.  Let me know if there
is another way.

Thu

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 10:23 AM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Why do you need it extended?  This deal may not be able to get extended.
Which meter are you having problems with?

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Aimee,

I am so sorry...I don't know what's wrong with me.  The deal is 343421.  If
you can't extend this deal please let me know.  Thanks

Thu

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 07:59 AM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Re: deal 34342

I don't have access to this ticket.  It is an IM Canada ticket.

	From:  Thu T Nguyen                           03/13/2001 05:45 PM

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 34342

Aimee, please extend the deal above to Feb 01.


Jeff:
Janice and I have been working on a deal with Fred LaGrasta that involves
entering into a Crude Oil Purchase Agreement.  Their lawyer has come back
with the following requests which Janice has asked me to run by you:

1. They want to delete the arbitration provision or at the very least delete
the waiver of the right to recover attorneys fees.  They claim that this
conflicts with an indemnity clause in the agreement for non-performance which
allows for recovery of attorneys fees.

2. They want to delete  subsection (e) of the submission to jurisdiction
clause which contains a waiver of the right to claim immunity from suit,
execution, attachment or other legal process.

Can we give on these points?  They owe us back payments on financial swaps
that we have done with them and the purpose of entering into this Purchase
Agreement is to be able to offset what they owe us under the swaps with what
we owe them for the crude that we purchase.  It's a long story as to how we
ended up here but suffice it to say that this is our only hope of getting
them to recognize the swaps and honor their obligations under the swaps so if
there is any way taht we can accommodate their requests to get the deal done,
that would be great.
Carol


Are you going to take care of this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Prendergast, Pat
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:36 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Baker, Lee
Subject:	FW: Adaytum Invoices Issues

Tracy,
Joe Darensbourg called me today asking about some invoices he received from Adaytum for Contributor Administrator and Advanced Analyst training that I am scheduled to take.  I told him that I had already expensed and sent a check to Adaytum for these two classes.
He, Joe, called me later to ask if I had coded this training to one of the Adaytum projects, namely an O&M project.  I told him I did not.  He said he would send me an email with the project(s) number(s).  I haven't received it as yet.
Lee wants to be sure that you are aware of this since we don't have any way of monitoring what is coming from Adaytum direct to Enron.
Thanks,
Pat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baker, Lee
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Prendergast, Pat
Subject:	Adaytum Invoices Issues

Pat,

Thanks for letting me know about the Adaytum invoice issue that Joe Darensbourg contacted you about.  I have not been involved in any of the invoicing with Adaytum, Tracy Geaccone is handling that for ETS.

Would you please e-mail Tracy and let her know the particulars of this issue.   I assume Joe has taken care of it, but I would like to keep her in the loop on any cost or invoice issues.

Thanks.

    Lee Baker
    Manager Financial Planning
    ETS Operations Financial Planning
    (713) 853-5292


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	eserver@enron.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-eserver+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:05 PM
To:	jderric@enron.com
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - London

The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Sherri Sera
Expense Report Name: London
Report Total: $9,779.95
Amount Due Employee: $9,779.95
Amount Approved: $9,779.92
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Accounting Review
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Just to confirm

	Payment through Wed - 11/14 (with interest) = $14,153,688.78
	Payment through Thur - 11/15 (with interest) = $14,155,586.71

The Settlement Agreement is written based on a Wed payment - if they want to argue for another $1,100 in interest, then we can send it to them in pennies.

Brian


Very impressive.  We don't have to read these, do we?


Yes, you can create the deal ticket.

D

   Aimee Lannou                04/17/2000 10:56 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA 202 and HPL 216 Transport Contracts Needed at Meter 378 for
March 2000

Daren - Would there be a problem if I created a desk to desk for meter 378
for  March 2000 going forward?  It would help out with the allocation
process.  The kind of deal I need is the total opposite of deal # 115101.
Please let me know if there is a problem. Volume management would like this
done today.  Thanls.

- Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000 10:51
AM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
04/17/2000 09:19 AM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA 202 and HPL 216 Transport Contracts Needed at Meter 378 for
March 2000

Aimee:

The ENA 012-27049-02-002 and HPL 012-41500-02-016 contract are not at Meter
378 for March 2000.  I need for you to put the correct deal number for both
contracts in Path Manager.

We need the ENA 202 contract as a delivery and the HPL 216 as a receipt.
Please get the deal in the System this morning and let me know what the deal
numbers are and I will set up the arraignments and let you know what the
Track ID's are.

Thanks,

Fred


----- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on 05/29/01 12:17 PM -----

                    "Michael
                    Gagliardi"           To:     <dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com>, david_ricks@gsdm.com,
                    <mikegag@msn.        tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com
                    com>                 cc:
                                         Subject:     Fw: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #56
                    05/29/01
                    11:29 AM

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: TruOrange@aol.com
 Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 8:19 PM
 To: TruOrange@aol.com; judy.roach@bakerbotts.com
 Subject: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #56

 True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service
 Volume 9, Fax/E-Mail #56, Monday, May 28, 2001
 Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
 Phone
 512-795-8536

 Earl Anderson Commits to Horns; Lyle Sendlein Poised to Come Aboard

 Earl Anderson of San Marcos, the quickest big DT I've seen this year, says
 he
 has committed to Texas unofficially and will make it official Sunday when
 he
 comes to the Longhorns' first mini-camp.
 Lyle Sendlein of Scottsdale Chaparral, another big DT prospect who is so
 fast
 he plays middle linebacker at his school, told me he also plans to commit
 at
 Sunday's camp "if they offer me a  scholarship." Don't worry, Lyle, your
 scholarship will be waiting for you.
 When Anderson and Sendlein commit officially on Sunday, it will give the
 Longhorns the lead in early recruiting in the Big 12 and start them on the

 way to a fourth straight top five national recruiting class.
 Anderson is the highest ranked Texas blue-chipper to pick a college. He is

 No. 3 on my 25-man "difference-maker" list, and Texas also has a
 commitment
 from OL Bret Valdez of Brownwood, who is No. 23 on that list. Sendlein is
 the
 top recruit in Arizona and, if he lived in Texas, he would be high in my
 top
 25.
 Anderson, who says he has grown an inch to 6-4 and now weighs 275, told me

 can still break 4.8 in the 40 on most days. "I ran a 4.78 the last time I
 was
 clocked," he said. "I want to stay below 4.8, so I'm watching my weight
 now."
 I was the first guy to give him a high ranking after seeing his incredible

 quickness last season.
 He said he picked Texas over Texas A&M, Florida State and others because
 UT
 "has the great combination of athletics and academics that I want and it's
 so
 close that my parents won't have to spend a lot of money traveling around
 to
 see me play."
 Besides that, he said, "I've always been a Longhorn fan."
 Sendlein comes from such a Longhorn family that his UT linebacker brother
 is
 named Austin. Their father, Robin, was a great linebacker at Texas and
 also
 played in the NFL for many years. He said he is 6-5, 275, and can run the
 40
 in 4.85. His Scottsdale team has gone 14-0 two straight years and his
 prowess
 as a defender is one of the main reasons for the team's success.
 Sendlein was being recruited by all the top schools in the Pac 10, plus
 Notre
 Dame, Nebraska, Michigan and Penn State.
 Coach Mack Brown said one of the Longhorns' top recruiting goals this year

 was to sign several top defensive linemen, and, while he can't comment on
 individual recruits,  Anderson and Sendlein are top-notch defensive line
 prospects.
 Another great defensive line prospect, Chase Pittman of Shreveport
 Evangel,
 came in at 6-4 1/2 and 261 and ran a 4.8 40 at a Nike camp at LSU
 recently,
 and he also bench pressed 185 pounds 36 times. No one else at the camp was

 able to bench press 185 pounds more than 22 times. Pittman bench pressed
 440
 pounds, a tremendous achievement for a high school junior, at a recent
 charity fund raising event at Evangel.
 He is the younger brother of Cole Pittman, the former UT defensive linemen

 who was killed in a tragic auto accident earlier this year while returning
 to
 Texas for spring training. He is considering Texas, LSU and Oklahoma.
 CB Donald Burgs of Houston Madison plans to come to the second UT
 mini-camp
 on June 10, and there is a good chance he will commit to the Longhorns. He
 is
 a big Texas fan who is No. 15 on my "difference-maker" list.
 * * * *
 FOOTBALL NOTES: A columnist for the Sporting News has picked Texas No. 1.
 I
 like his sentiments and I think the Longhorns will be one of the nation's
 elite teams this season, but it's tough to go all the way when you have to

 win your division of the Big 12, beat a team like Nebraska or Kansas State
 in
 the league championship game and then tame someone like Florida State or
 Miami in the Rose Bowl. Texas could do it, but so could several other
 teams.
 Darrell Royal won three national titles at Texas, but I always thought his

 1964 team might have been his best one. Bear Bryant probably thought so,
 too,
 because it beat his national championship Alabama team and Joe Namath in
 the
 Orange Bowl, but a one-point loss at Arkansas kept the Horns from
 repeating
 as national champs. The point of that flashback is that a team can be
 very, v
 ery good and still not win the national title.
 * * * *
 My next e-mail/fax will be whenever events warrant.
 * * * *
 The True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service includes  at  least  99 fax/e-mails  a
 year and costs $99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes
 26
 newsletters and is published weekly during football season and twice
 monthly
 during most of the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both

 for $130 (or $110 if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take the

 faxes and newsletter  via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of
 page.
 I also  update my 900 number ? 1-900-288-8839 ? frequently with recruiting

 news. My E-Mail address is: truorange@aol.com

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Please find the above article attached


Krishna,

Niclas introduces himself as an associate in the Research Group.
I think we should clarify his status.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

"Michael SCHILMOELLER" <Michael_Schilmoeller@pgn.com> on 08/15/2000 11:08:06
AM
To: NOTES:Niclas.Egmar@ENRON
cc: vkamins@enron.com, Grant_Masson@pgn.com, Stinson_Gibner@pgn.com
Subject: Re: Info help.

Hi Niclas,

I am in the middle of preparing some presentations right now, so it might be
more productive to speak by phone (503-464-8430).  Please leave your number,
if you get my voicemail.

To get you started, you might see if you can get access to the FERC GADS
database of plant forced and planned availability.  It seems others in
Research have asked about this, so you may already have this at your
disposal.  The EIA has a good electronic database of plant FOR and POR
available for free (http://www.nerc.com/~esd/).  I know Alexios in RE/EES has
this.  If you wanted to do it the hard way, you can also ask Jaison to access
the EPA's CEMS data he has summarized on a machine there in Research.  It
contains hourly plant operation for every unit over about 50MW, which you
could aggregate up.

The WSCC 10-year forecast of new plant construction and loads is a good place
to start for plant construction information, but suffers from some notorious
"self-reporting" error.  It is available in pdf form from the web site
http://www.wscc.com/.  Other sources that should be more near-term, but more
accurate are the CEC inventory of plants (http://www.energy.ca.gov/) and the
BPA Whitebook (http://www.transmission.bpa.gov).

As far as basic economic data is concerned, you can either rely on the
reported utility forecasts for loads, or you can go to fundamental data.  The
ultimate source of the census data collected by the US Dept of Commerce,
which you can buy on CDROM for cheap.  It would have this kind of information
by SIC code, by ZIP code.  You may also have access to one of the economic
forecasting businesses (Wharton's WEFA, DRI, etc.)  They have this in highly
digested and complete form.

BTW, Tim Heizenrader, who runs Fundamental Analysis and Research on the West
Desk, is a sharp cookie and should have all this under control.  Is your
client aware of this resource?

Give me a buzz and we can talk more,
Michael

>>> Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@ENRON 08/14/00 12:49PM >>>
Michael,

I'm an analyst in the research group. I would like your help with finding
some information specific for the West Coast. A new analyst on the West Power
desk needs information on planned outages and planned new generation. He is
studying the long-term fundamentals of electricity volatility on the West
Coastso so he also needs info on housing starts, computer sales or industrial
production figures for computer manufacturing, growth of start-up companies,
and population stats.

Any help in finding the needed info would be greatly appreciated. Contact me
or Daniel Kang (new analyst).

Niclas
 - TEXT.htm


Thersa,
I have not spoken to CIG directly about the maintaince.  I was making sure
that everyone was in the loop concerning any CIG business that could have an
impact on Young Storage.  The messages I received talked about Ft. Morgan
Storage Facility. Did not know if FT.Morgan and Young were seperate
facilities or one in the same.

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Theresa.Staab@enron.com [mailto:Theresa.Staab@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:08 AM
To: Poole Jr., Robert W.
Cc: Hack, John W.; 'Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com'
Subject: Re: Young Storage Status

Robert,
I will fax you the invoice for Young Storage right now.  I understood from
Julie Adams at CIG that Young Storage should not be affected by the
maintenance in August.  Is that your understanding?

Let me know if you need further information.
Thanks,
Theresa
(303) 575-6485

                    "Poole Jr., Robert

                    W."                         To:
"'Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com'" <Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com>,
"'Theresa.Staab@enron.com'"
                    <Robert.Poole@atmose        <Theresa.Staab@enron.com>

                    nergy.com>                  cc:     "Hack, John W."
<John.Hack@atmosenergy.com>
                                                Subject:     Young Storage
Status
                    07/31/2001 09:52 AM

Paul & Thersa,
I need to check on the status of the Young Storage field.  I need to update
John on where the phyisical balances are in that field.  I sent you e-mails
concerning the scheduled maitaince CIG is doing with that field in August.
Could you please send me the Young Storage summary in the Young Storage
invoice for June?  What is your expected balance at July 31st?

If you could please send me that information as soon as possible, I would
appreciate it.

Thanks..Robert

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041904.txt


John,

The Long and short name modifications are complete on the first request, the second request for the "new" books with the previous CP long/short names/contacts is also complete.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valdes, John
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Hare, Bill D.
Cc:	Keiser, Kam; Cheung, Cecilia
Subject:	Change to New Books Set up Previously

Bill,

Please review the attached spreadsheet.  We need to change both the short name and long name on the Central CAD GCP ID's 166860, 166863, 166867, 166871, 166875, and 166877 to reflect that they are only GD books.  In addition, we also need to set up new GCP ID's for the FB-CENTX-CAD books to reflect that they are Price, Basis and Index.  Please call me to discuss if needed.  I will be out this afternoon, however, I will be checking my email as well as voice messages and returning calls.  My cell phone # is 713-628-9468.  Thanks.

John

 << File: Book Request Form Central PBI.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Central PBI.xls >>


Part 3

Recruiting Roundup

Today (Monday) was the day the Longhorn coaches could start another big
recruiting push by going to top recruits' schools and homes, but the big game
Saturday has pushed that back a week.
But don't worry about it. Coach Mack Brown wrote the book on recruiting and
his previous four classes at Texas have been very good, and some of them have
been great.
This year's class has a chance to be as good as any Brown and his assistants
have signed. There's a chance it could be the best of the bunch, even better
than the top-rated Chris Simms, Cory Redding class.
They already have 16 commitments, about half of them from players who have
been on at least one national top 100 list, and their class already is ranked
as one of the top five in the nation.
Let's take a look at where they are and where they are going:
OFFENSE
Quarterback
UT has a commitment from Billy Don Malone of Paris North Lamar, who is a lot
better than most of the gurus think, and the Horns have close to a 50-50 shot
at Vincent Young, the wonder kid at Houston Madison, who had his usual game
Friday for the undefeated Marlins, doing everything on offense and even
running an interception back for a touchdown. (Yes, he plays defense, too,
when needed.)
Running Back
The Horns have a commitment from Clint Haney of unbeaten Smithson Valley and
are in the hunt for power-runner deluxe Albert Hardy of Galena Park and
elusive Selvin Young of Jersey Village. They have an outside shot at Lorenzo
Booker of Ventura, Cal., the nation's highest rated running back.
Tight End
David Thomas of Wolfforth Frenship, a national top 100 player on some lists,
is already committed. He is very good. The only other TE the Horns are
recruiting is Eric Winston, the humongous pass catcher and blocker deluxe at
Midland Lee.
Wide Receiver
National top 100 star Marquis Johnson of Champaign, Ill., and Dustin Miksch
of Round Rock Westwood are already committed. Robert Timmons of Flower Mound
Marcus, a supremely talented player who has little playing experience because
of transfer problems, is a possibility, and, if the Horns don't get him, they
might wind up with Biren Ealy of Cypress Falls or Anthony Wright of Klein
Forest.
Line
The Horns already have a pledge from Neale Tweedie of Allen, a great pass
blocker who is on several national top 100 lists, and from Brett Valdez of
Brownwood, a tremendous run blocker.
They are still recruiting Justin Blalock of Plano East and Tony Ugoh of
Spring Westfield. Blalock is the best run blocker I've seen this year.
DEFENSE
End
Chase Pittman of Shreveport Evangel, a national top 100 player, has committed
and will enroll in January and go through spring training, which will give
him a chance to see action as a true freshman. The Longhorns are in the hunt
for Bryan Pickryl of Jenks, Okla., a speed rusher deluxe, Larry Dibbles of
Lancaster and Travis Leitko of The Woodlands. All three are on every national
top 100 list I've seen.
Tackle
Texas has commitments from four top tackles - Sonny Davis of Gulf Coast
Community College, a JC in Mississippi, Earl Anderson of San Marcos, Lyle
Sendlein of Scottsdale Chapaparral and Tully Jantzen of Keller. Davis has
some academic issues. Sendlein also is a very good offensive lineman and
Jantzen is swift enough to play end. Texas has a very good shot at Rodrique Wr
ight of Alief Hastings, the nation's top DT, and at Marco Martin of Mesquite,
another national top 100 player. Kasey Studdard of Highlands Ranch, Colo, who
excels at DT and OG, also is a strong possibility. It's 50-50 on whether he
will play offense or defense in college. He is the son of David Studdard, a
former UT offensive line star who had a long career with the Denver Broncos.
Linebacker
Texas starts three seniors and needs a great group. Garnet Smith of Arlington
Lamar, Brian Robison of of Splendora and Marcus Myers of Pflugerville are
already committed and the Horns are still recruiting several top one from
Texas and across the country. A. J. Nicholson of Winston Salem, N. C., and
Aaron Thomas of North Mesquite are national top 100 middle backers who are
strongly considering Texas, and Michael Williams of Lindale and Rufus
Alexander of Baton Rouge Christian Life, are fast outside backers the Horns
are recruiting. Another possibility is Lance Mitchell a top JC linebacker in
California who ir orignally from Dallas. He is considering taking a visit.
Defensive Backs
Matt Melton, a hard-hitting safety from Tyler, is already committed. Swift
Edorian McCullough of North Garland, the Class 5A 100 meter champ, also is
considering Texas, along with Brodney Pool, a big, fast safety from Houston
Westbury.
Kicker
Texas is looking for a kicker, but has not homed in on one yet. The coaches
want someone who can kick off into the end zone consistently.

Longhorn Basketball Adds Pair

Twotop basketball recruits have signed with Texas, head coach Rick Barnes has
announced.
Brad Buckman, a 6-9, 235-pound forward from Austin Westlake, and Kenton
Paulino, 6-2, 165, a com bo guard from  Los Angeles Fremond HS who will play
for Maine Central Institute this season, are the new signees.
"Signing Brad and Kenton is another sign that our program is really on the
rise," Barnes said.  "Both have great athleticism and an attitude of winning
about them that we need to continue to bring to The University of Texas."
Buckman plays for coach Clifton McNeely is at Westlake and is a national top
30 recruit.
The No. 2 high school prospect in  Texas according to Mike Kunstadt's Texas
Hoops, Buckman averaged 19.8 points, 10.4 rebounds and 4.3 blocks per game
during his junior season.
He also is tabbed the No. 15 prospect in the nation by Clark Francis' Hoop
Scoop.  Buckman earned Most Outstanding Player honors at the prestigious
Pitt3 Five-Star Camp this July in Pittsburgh, Pa.
"There's not a program in the nation that did not go after Brad during the
recruiting period, so to come out on top in that battle is a huge win for
us," Barnes said.
"Brad turned down four of the most storied programs in college basketball
history for the opportunity to play at Texas." Barnes said.
"He made one of the biggest jumps in his game that I have seen during the
summer camp period.
Brad has a tremendous competitive fire and is one of those players that fans
here will really appreciate."
Paulino plays under coach Carl Hendrickson at Maine Central.  He starred at
Fremont High School under coach Sam Sullivan, where he averaged 24 points a
game and earned Los Angeles Co-Player of the Year accolades during his senior
campaign.
"Kenton is one of those explosive scoring guards that we need in our
program," Barnes said.
"He is a very good shooter with range and an exceptional athlete who
high-jumped 6-10 in high school. Kenton is the complete guard we were looking
for."

Horns Sign 2 in Softball

Texas softball coach Connie Clark has signed centerfielder Tina Boutelle of
Katy Taylor and second baseman Chezare Sievers of Aliso Niguel HS in Mission
Viejo, Calif.
"We are excited about signing two of the top recruits in the country," Clark
said. "Tina and Chezare will be immediate impact players for us. We only lose
two players to graduation in the spring of 2002 and are pleased to have Tina
and Chezare as our newest additions to the softball program."
Boutelle, a 5-5 left-handed hitter, was named first team All-American as a
junior while helping her team to a 31-4 record and a second-place finish at
the Texas 5A State Championship.
She also is an All-District and All-Greater Houston selection. She was named
to the Texas Girls Coaches Association All-State Team and first team Academic
All-District in 2000.
Boutelle helped the Katy Cruisers club team to its second consecutive ASA
Gold National Championship in 2001, playing with UT freshmen pitcher Cat Os
terman and third baseman/shortstop Tiffany Anders. With her addition, the
Longhorns will have five players on the roster that have played for the Katy
Cruisers.
"Tina is definitely a long-ball threat," Clark said. "She has tremendously
quick hands and extremely good foot speed. Tina also is the type of player to
make things happen because she plays with a lot of passion and enthusiasm."
Sievers  finished her 2001 season with a .427 batting average and 19 RBIs.
She was named first team All-League and second team All-County as a junior.
The 5-0 infielder also was named first team All-California Interscholastic
Federation (CIF) as a sophomore. She is a member of the California Cruisers
club team, which placed second at the 2001 ASA Gold National Championships to
the Katy Cruisers.
"Chez can cover a lot of ground," Clark said. "She is an extra-base type of
hitter who also has the ability to play the short game. Chez also has
tremendously quick hands and I think fans will be excited to watch her play."

Longhorn Women Start Fast

Sophomore center-forward Stacy Stephens led the Longhorn women's basketball
team to the championship of the Paradise Jam Tournament in St. Thomas last
weekend.
Stephens was named the tourney MVP after leading Texas past Southern
California, 66-64, in the championship game. She had 16 points and six of
them came in the final two minutes.
Freshman Heather Schreiber was named to the All-Tournament Team after scoring
13 points, and another freshman forward, Kala Bowers, had 10 points.
Stephens and senior point guard Kenya Larkin had led Texas to a 75-70 upset
win over No. 23 Wisconsin in the semifinals game Saturday.
Stephens had 17 points and 13 rebounds against the Badgers and Larkin added
14 points and six assists. She also made four free throws in the final two
minutes.
The Longhorns are off to a 3-0 start and host No. 19 LSU Thursday night.

Texas Men 4th in Tourney

The Longhorn men lost to No. 20 Indiana, 77-71, Saturday in the third-place
game in the Great Alaska Shootout Tournament in Anchorage.
Freshman point guard T. J. Ford led Texas with 16 points and eight assists.
Senior forward Chris Owens, held scoreless in the first half, got 14 after i
ntermission.
Texas lost to Gonzaga, 67-64, in the semifinals. Sophomore Royal Ivey had 15
points for the Longhorns.

The Perfect Christmas Present
For Horns Who Have Everything Else - A Gift Subscription to True Orange
and/or the E-Mail/Fax
A subscription to True Orange is the great gift you can give again and again.
Sure beats Christmas shopping, birthday shopping or anniversary shopping.
The only thing better is  a gift of  True Orange and the True Orange Fax  -
and you can give both for just $130 a year ($99 if they take both by e-mail).

o  I am enclosing $45 for a gift subscription ($35 e-mail)
o  I am enclosing $130 for a gift subscription to the newsletter and the fax
($99 e-mail)

Name of Recipient

Address (& fax no., if applicable)

City, State, Zip

Your Name

Any Message You Want on Card


I've thought about you a few times in the last few months, didn't want
to intrude upon an already bad situation with my bullshit questions.
I'm hearing some pretty depressing stuff from the people I know at ENE.

I wish I had the capital to open my own shop.there will be talent and
opportunity a plenty on the market soon.  I'll ask around.I've got some
friends at Duke and Dynegy from B-school, the Gianoucous (spelling??)
brothers (John and Dimitri.from elementary school) started their own
outfit a while back, and my old man is at Schlumberger and has good
contacts in general (if you aren't married to a trading environment).

Give me a few days, and I'll be in touch.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Cuilla, Martin [mailto:Martin.Cuilla@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Mike Contant (E-mail)
Subject: will work for food

you guys have any job opening for ex natural gas traders that made their
now almost defunctc ompany over 40 million in the last two years?  not
sure how much longer ene is going to be around and i'm checking out my
options!

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 12:38 PM
---------------------------

Brian Hoskins
06/27/2000 08:46 AM
To: Barry Steinhart/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roberto
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis
Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Her Story vs. His Story

> > > > > > << > HER STORY:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > He was in an odd mood when I got to the
>bar to meet him, I thought it might have been because I was a bit late.
>He didn't say anything much about it. He seemed silent, distracted and
>his only eye contact seemed judgmental.  I decided maybe I should never
>wear that dress again.  Well, maybe it was the color.  Maybe I should
>never wear this color again either.
> > > > > > > The conversation was so slow going so I thought maybe we
>should go off somewhere more intimate so we could talk more privately.
>He didn't really seem to agree, but we went off to this quiet, little
>restaurant and he's STILL acting a bit funny and I'm trying to cheer him
>up, be witty and tell cute stories, but I start to wonder whether it's
>me or something else.
> > > > > > > He doesn't smile much, so I ask him, but he says no. But you
>know I'm not really sure. I wonder and then I think about the 5 pounds
>I gained this past month. I bet he thinks I'm a fat hog now. Anyway, in
>the cab back to his house, I say that I love him and he just puts his
>arm around me, but doesn't squeeze. I don't know what the hell this all
>means or what I should think because you know he doesn't say it back or
>do anything.
>We finally get back to his place and I'm wondering if he's going to dump
>me. So I try to ask him about it but he just switches on the TV.
>Reluctantly, I say I'm going to go to sleep. Then, after about 10
>minutes or so, he joins me and we have sex. But, he still seems really,
>really distracted, so afterwards I just wanted to leave. I roll over and
>sniffle a little real quietly. He snores. I dunno, I just don't know,
>what he thinks anymore. I mean, do you think he's met someone else?
>
>
> > > > > > > HIS STORY:
>
>Shitty day at work. Tired. Got laid though.


201 Situation:

Powell Goldstein called to clarify what the situation is after several
misleading trade press articles indicated that the Administration was leaning
against filing a Section 201 initiation.   The Bottom Line is:  the
Administration is still very much undecided on how to proceed on a 201
investigation and even more undecided on which remedy to implement if harm is
found.   We have learned from Senior level officials they are considering the
following options:

Option 1: The Administration will initiate a Section 201 investigation on
steel with an accompanying statement saying that the initiation does not in
anyway indicate if and what remedy would be implemented.  The threat to an
Administration investigation, is that quotas are the expected remedy.  By
taking this approach, the Administration would allow the ITC to determine if
the imports are trade related or a result of industry market structure, while
placing a chilling effect on the possible implementation of quotas.   The
USTR supports this approach; the Department of Treasury has not been persuade
it is prudent; the  Department of Commerce is trying to negotiate the middle
ground; and the White House is still undecided.

Option 2:  Allow the Senate Finance Committee to initiate a 201
investigation, but issue a similar statement indicating no remedy
commitment.

Timing:

The EU-US Summit is meeting the second week of June and this will be on the
agenda, so do not expect anything before June 14.  The Senate Finance
Committee is in transition after Sen. Jeffords switched parties and the
Committees are being reformulated, which could take several weeks.  Look to
the end of June for a decision by the Administration.  The Administration
will face pressure to make a decision after the Steel Workers converge on
Washington next week.

Remedy:

There has been some confusion about a Multilateral Steel Agreement (MSA)
being negotiated in place of a 201 investigation.  We have learned that this
is not going to happen.  The MSA is one of the possible remedies, but the
Administration has made it clear that it would only be a possible remedy if a
Sec. 201 investigation is initiated.  An MSA would require voluntary
restraints negotiated between all steel producing nations.  Another option
are voluntary restraint agreements (VRAs) which are bilaterally negotiated
agreements.   The other options are well known:  quotas, tariffs,
quantitative restrictions, etc.


Peter, Louise has requested a review of the various forms to be utilized in NETCO.  It is my current understanding that Canada trading will be included.   Therefore, we need you to review the Canadian physical forms.  I have mentioned the matter to Bradford, who will be calling you with Credit concerns and suggestions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 10:41 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Contracts

I have given Mark Taylor my comments on the financial forms and he will be revising them.  I have met with Van Hooser and Hodge to discuss gas and have spoken with Bradford to get his perspective on gas.  We will be narrowing the menu of forms, revising in respect of certain terms, and studying possible construct changes to assist in credit matters.  Mark mentioned next Tuesday as a target which I will try to meet.  The EOL forms will be completed first.  Any questions, call me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Cook, Mary
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank; Luce, Laura; Lagrasta, Fred; Redmond, Brian; Breslau, Craig
Subject:	Contracts

The gas contracts we need include the following, can you give us timescales. I understand that we have had issues getting these together and time is now running out.  Mark, I believe, has put you in charge or gas -please could you give us a timescale.

Draft Master Firm
Draft Master Swap
GTC (physical)
GTC (financial)

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/17/2000
01:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett @ ECT                           10/17/2000 09:45 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Systems - ERMS

John -

Again,  we are having "big time" systems issues.  While we are having the
usual length of time issues (a few people were here past midnight last
night), the issues that occured last night are much more serious than in the
past.  The system brought through totally inaccurate information on a few
books.  (Positions,  value,  etc.)  Luckily, these errors were all caught
last night,  but if a less experienced person had been on those books,  it
could have been a disaster.  (Traders getting incorrect positions and p&l and
interest rate and credit getting incorrect numbers.)  I have contacted those
in ERMS that need to be involved,  but I would appreciate it if you could
provide additional support to this effort.

Thanks,

Jeff


No, because they are in networks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Becker, Melissa
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	question-no hurry

Should I include Mike Sullivan's group as part of Global Accounting? Call me if you want to discuss.  Thanks!


Ann Bike and Elizabeth Hernandez were suppose to handle the booking of this deal.  It is a real deal.  ENA is paying a 5 cent demand charge on 310000 for the opton to park gas in March and take out in August/.  Please contact Ann Bike for the sitara dealnumber.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ellis, Laurie
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Cal Hub - Aug 2001

Jane, Cal Hub has invoiced ENA $15,500.00 for August 2001.  However, I do not show anything in our system.  Do you know if this is valid and if so, do you know the Sitara number?  Thanks.

Laurie Ellis
Specialist - Gas Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone: (713) 345-9945
Fax:  (713) 646-8420
email:  laurie.ellis@enron.com


Each meter is now to be treated seperately: Tickets have been created
accordingly.

Meter 1233

Base  148376
Swing  148382
Buyback 148381

Meter 1394

Base  148390
Swing  148391
Buyback 148396

Meter 8018

Base   148376
Swing  148382
Buyback 148381

Volume Management will need to set up accounting arrangements to cover
November and December 1999. Scheduling will repath and renom Unify, and
reallocate POPS for January.

If anyone has anything to add to this please let me know.

Ken


Clarifications:

SDG&E's Bill cap is as follows

Residential: $68 per mouth through 1/1/01 and $75 per mouth through 12/31/01
for those who consume 500kWh per month or less - market prices for the others
residential.
Commercial: $220 per mouth through 1/1/01 and $240 per mouth through 12/31/01
for those who consume 1500 kWh per month or less - market place for other
commercial
The decision intends to allow for future adjustment of the kWh monthly
consumption for bill caps retroactive to June 1, 200 to ensure that customers
in hotter inland regions have an appropriate level of usage cap and medium
size commercial customers are provided relief.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/22/2000
02:56 PM ---------------------------

Bruno Gaillard
08/21/2000 03:45 PM
To: Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Chris
Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES,
Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT, mday@gmssr.com, SF Directors,
Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain@Enron,
James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: SDG&E Rate Cap

Duque's Decision passed 3-2 (Duque, Neeper, Bilas - Lynch, Wood) - Both
Neeper and Bilas said that they were only voting for this decision because of
pressure. They both felt that last meeting's decision provided sufficient
relief and provided for a investigation to address longer term problems.

Summary:

The Decision institutes a rate stabilization for residential and commercial
customers
 Residential: $68 through 1/1/01 and $75 through 12/31/01 for those who
consume 500kW or less - market prices for the others residential
 Commercial: $220 through 1/1/01 and $240 through 12/31/01 for those who
consume 1500 kW or less - market place for other commercial

Other rate schedules: Subject to market prices

Implementation date: Retroactive to 6/1/00 - SDG&E will provide a credit for
those customers that are eligible no latter than September 30th

The decision intends to allow for future adjustment of the kWh rate caps
retroactive to June 1, 200 to ensure that customers in hotter inland regions
have an appropriate level of usage cap and medium size commercial customers
are provided relief.

The bill stabilization plan requires SDG&E to file comments, by September 30,
addressing the implementation and transition of a Levelized Payment Plan
(LPP) for all customers on an "opt out" basis. However, the procedure for the
implementation of the LLP will allow customers to readily exercise choice,
while those that do not exercise choice will default into the LPP.

The Commission will also further study the bill stabilization plan as to
direct access customers.

Revenue shortfalls are to be booked into the TCBA for future recovery of the
net shortfall.

Discussion:
Senator Alpert, Assembly Women Davis, Mayor Golding , the former mayor,
several members of the City and County of San Diego Board of Supervisors made
a public appearance. All thanked the Commission for  having this special
session. All supported the Wood decision. All stated that it did not  go far
enough and insisted that all customers should be subject to the cap. Assembly
Women Davis stated that she would be going back to the legislation  to pass
the Davis/Alpert Bill establishing a cap for all customers. However,
Asseblymember Wright, chairman of the Utilities and Commerce Committee, has
been open and has shown opposition to the Alpert/Davis bill.

If you have any questions, please call me at 415-782-7810

Bruno Gaillard - Government Affairs


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/30/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,811
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,896
Total Life to Date Transactions	391,409

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 10/30/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,412	72%
Enron Europe Limited	112	32%
Global Products	141	33%
Enron Metals	146	9%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,505,936,632
MTD	42,459,620,469
LTD	211,151,854,740
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,002,203,863

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	14,965,234,107

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	539
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,106
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,871
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,639


The tax representation which should be included in Section 6(d) of the
Letter Agreement is as follows:

Since its formation, the LLC has not made any tax elections on behalf
of the LLC, including any tax election that causes the LLC to be treated
as anything other than a disregarded entity in accordance with Income
Tax Regulations section 301.7701-3(b).


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy for 10/4/00.

The redeliveries wil be 0 as well.


Randy,

Could you please send me the info on the ethics course?  Thanks.

DG


Vince,

I just wanted to keep you informed - I have not received a contract from D-G
Energy Systems yet.  They had said they would send it last weekend but it
never came.  I sent Helyette Geman an e-mail yesterday asking the status but
she has not responded yet.

Karla


ENW VENTURES PORTFOLIO NEWS

Acta's New B2B Data Server Now Available for Multiple Operating Platforms;
ActaWorks 4.4 Significantly Expands Support for Industry-Leading Data
Integration Solutions

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 12, 2000--Acta Technology, Inc., the leader
in business-to-business (B2B) data integration, announced today the general
availability of ActaWorks 4.4, the latest version of its award winning
enterprise data server. ActaWorks 4.4 provides recent product and performance
enhancements that previously were available only for Windows NT (under
ActaWorks 4.3). Acta made the announcement at the eBusiness Conference and
Expo in New York City.
The new product significantly expands support for the industry-leading
provider of B2B data integration. With ActaWorks 4.4, businesses with Windows
NT, Windows 2000, and Unix environments (HP-UX, Sun Solaris, and IBM AIX) can
all employ Acta's new enhancements for packaging and delivering the data
essential for B2B eCommerce and business intelligence.
Among the new features is a repository architecture that enables centralized
metadata management and multi-user development. As businesses implement a
data platform to support both internal and external access to enterprise
data, the need to manage metadata from external and internal sources becomes
critical -- and the need for multiple users increases.
The addition of these new enhancements further solidifies Acta's leadership
position in B2B data integration, a rapidly emerging component of B2B
integration. Industry analysts have sized the data integration market at $15B
(cumulative) by 2005 -- a market that is being driven by the growing need to
provide information-rich data both inside and outside the extended
enterprise.
_________________________________________________________
OTHER NEWS

o Myutility Raises $3.5 Million, Buys Utility Business

NEW YORK -- Myutility, an energy services marketplace
and information provider for businesses, said it
bought the Teldata Solutions automated meter reading
systems (AMR) and revenue cycle services (RCS) business
from National Grid Group, which simultaneously invested
$3.5 million in Myutility. National Grid purchased
Teldata, a data acquisition products and services
firm, last year. Myutility said it will use the
funding to expand its services and for operations
and is still seeking additional funding. Myutility
raised an undisclosed amount of seed capital from
TSG Equity Partners in September.
http://www.myutility.com/
_____________________________________________

o Managed ASP Cosential Raises $1.8 Million in Funding

WILTON, Conn. -- Cosential, a managed ASP for architecture,
construction, and engineering companies, said it
raised $1.8 million in financing. Silicon Alley
Venture Partners led the round, which included Milestone
Venture Partners and Venture Quest. The company
will use the funding to launch a new ASP service.
Cosential said its enhanced ASP product will be
available in the first quarter of 2001.
http://www.cosential.com/
_____________________________________________

AQUILA ENERGY CORPORATION (*TBA*) Files for $425.00 Million Initial Public
Offering

http://www.ipo.com/ipoinfo/profile.asp?p=IPO&c=0001128032

Aquila Energy Corporation is a wholesale energy merchant
that provides comprehensive energy solutions to clients
in North America, the United
Kingdom and continental
Europe.

Lead Managed By: Lehman Brothers
________________________________________________________________________
Trade-Ranger integrates multiple buying programs

HOUSTON, Dec. 13 -- Trade-Ranger, an Internet marketplace for the procurement
of supplies by the energy industry, has integrated another type of software
into its site to eliminate barriers to its customers and to help build
liquidity.
Allen May, interim co-CEO, told LocalBusiness.com the site has added another
buying tool, iPlanet BuyerXpert software, at the request of one of its
founding partners. Trade-Ranger already had Oracle Corp.'s iProcurement and
Commerce One's e-procurement programs.
"Our members are transacting, we have integrated multiple buying tools to the
Commerce One platform, and we are continuing our effort to build the most
efficient content hub in the industry," May said.
"We will adopt the best-of-breed technology," he said.
Houston-based Trade-Ranger was incorporated in August. Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL)
is based in Redwood City, Calif., while Commerce One (Nasdaq: CMRC) is based
in Pleasanton, Calif. Meanwhile, iPlanet is a product of iPlanet E-Commerce
Solutions, a Sun-Netscape Alliance. Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: SUNW) is based
in Palo Alto, Calif.
Trade-Ranger is building its membership, and no numbers were immediately
available, May said.
Technology can be a barrier to liquidity growth, May said. Some marketplaces
simply tell customers they must adopt that marketplace's technology, he said.
"We definitely have an open policy," May said.
He added that Trade-Ranger has made a significant investment in technology,
although he was unwilling to disclose the amount spent.
Formerly the Energy and Petrochemical Exchange, the Houston-based exchange
announced its formation on April 11. The exchange describes itself as
"created by the industry for the industry."
Membership is available to all companies, buyers and sellers, in the
upstream, downstream, retail and petrochemical sectors. Upstream refers to
oil and gas producers, while downstream refers to the refining section of the
business.
The original 14 founding partners are Royal Dutch/Shell, BP, TotalFinaElf,
The Dow Chemical Co., Conoco Inc., Motiva Enterprises, Occidental Petroleum,
Equilon Enterprises, Phillips Petroleum, Mitsubishi Corp., Repsol, YPF,
Statoil, Unocal and Tosco.
The collective annual purchasing budgets of the founding partners exceeds
$125 billion worldwide.
____________________________________________________________
GM, Ford take $1.26-billion US stake in Commerce One software company

12/12/2000
The Canadian Press
Copyright (c) 2000 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
DETROIT (AP) _ Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. will take a combined
$1.26-billion US stake in Commerce One, making the business-to-business
software company a technology partner in the automakers' Covisint online
exchange.
Pleasanton, Calif.-based Commerce One said it will issue to GM and Ford 14.4
million shares apiece, with each stake valued at about $631.8 million, based
on Commerce One's close Tuesday of $43.88 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The
combined number of shares represents a 14 per cent interest in Commerce One.
Half the shares for each company will be held in escrow until 2002, and will
be released to Ford and GM upon satisfaction of certain conditions. If
conditions are not met, the shares will be released to the two automakers in
mid-2004.
Commerce One said it will undergo a corporate restructuring into a holding
company and get a two per cent equity interest in Covisint, the Internet
exchange started by Ford, GM and three other automakers. Covisint
incorporated for business Monday.
Commerce One's stake in Covisint will be held in escrow until the completion
of the restructuring, on which Commerce One shareholders are to vote next
year.
Commerce One will be entitled to a share of the revenue generated by the
Covisint exchange for an expected 10-year term, as well as be paid for
consulting services it provides to Covisint.
``We look forward to continuing our efforts with Covisint to deliver a global
e-marketplace platform for the automotive industry,'' Mark Hoffman, Commerce
One's chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. ``Covisint is an
excellent example of Commerce One's business model and reflects our
commitment to moving the world's business commerce onto the Web.''
In addition to Ford and GM, Covisint's backers include DaimlerChrysler AG,
Nissan and Renault, as well as Commerce One and fellow software firm Oracle.
Covisint is supposed to act as an Internet marketplace for the auto industry,
allowing suppliers and automakers to swap information and conduct business
far more quickly and cheaply than they have in the past.
Detroit's automakers have said Covisint should be able to route their
purchases of $250 billion a year in goods and services.
Covisint said it has more than 250 customers on two continents already using
its services, including catalogues, auctions, quote management and
collaborative design.
______________________________________________

o Compaq Adds $100 Million to Storage Investment Fund

HOUSTON -- Compaq Computer said it is expanding
its storage investment fund with an additional $100
million in 2001. The company's investment program
focuses on accelerating the development and adoption
of storage hardware, software, and utility provider
technology. Compaq has invested in storage firms
such as HighGround Systems, Prisa Networks, and
StorageNetworks.
http://www.compaq.com/
_____________________________________________

o Remote Net Access Firm iPass Adds $20 Million to Round Four

REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. -- iPass, a provider of global
remote Internet access services, said it has closed
its fourth, Series F round with an additional $20
million, bringing in Cisco as a new investor. Total
funding for the round was $50 million. As reported
in September, Crosspoint Ventures, Accel Partners,
Comdisco, Equant, Rogers Communications and Sand
Hill Capital also contributed to the round. iPass
said it will use the funds to extend the development
of its settlement and authentication technologies.
http://www.ipass.com/
_____________________________________________

o Securant Technologies Lands $31 Million in Series C

SAN FRANCISCO -- Securant Technologies, which provides
access management software and services for Internet
business security, said it raised $31 million in
its Series C round of funding. Oak Investment Partners
led the round, which included Merrill Lynch and
individual investors. Oak Investment Partners general
partner Fred Harman and Richard Pierce, senior vice
president and COO of Inktomi, will sit on the company's
board of directors. The company will use the funding
for product development, sales and marketing, and
for international operating expenses.
http://www.securant.com/
_____________________________________________

o FIS Gets Funds from Autodesk; Autodesk Invest in Two Others

CAMARILLO, Calif. -- Facility Information Systems,
a provider of enterprise software for facility management
and corporate infrastructure resource management,
said it received funding from Autodesk Ventures.
Financial details were not disclosed. Separately,
Autodesk said it also invested in Alchemedia, a
developer of technology that protects against unauthorized
use of digital images, and Izoic, a software firm
focused on managing underground infrastructure maintenance.
Autodesk said the three investments totalled $3
million. Alchemedia also received funding in that
round from Carlyle Venture Partners and Hollinger
Capital. Izoic received funds from Insight Capital
Partners and Bechtel Ventures as well as Autodesk.
http://www.fisinc.com/
http://www.autodesk.com/
_____________________________________________

o App Infrastructure Firm Exenet Has $35 Million First Round

NEW YORK -- Exenet Technologies, an application
infrastructure provider, said it closed its $35
million initial round of funding. Telecom Partners
and CIBC Capital Partners participated in the round.
Exenet will use the funding to expand its outsourced
infrastructure service for ASPs, independent software
vendors, value added resellers (VARs), Regional
Bell operating companies, local exchange carriers,
and other corporations. Exenet provides lT outsourcing
and application infrastructure services, including
directory services, management services, storage
services, database management, and bandwidth provisioning
services.
http://www.exenet.com/


Got a question about Enron or what our businesses are doing?  Ask Jeff
Skilling!  Join him for an Office of the Chairman "open mike" session today
(May 30) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question.  Jeff will try to answer it during his event and you can read the
transcript later.

Cost cutting ideas are still coming into the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage).
We know you've got some great ideas tucked away in that brainy head of yours
-- deposit them into the ThinkBank!

There's some fiesty conversations going on in eMeet
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf.  Start your own today!


Oops, I sent you the wrong nom...  Here is the correct HPL Nom for August 11,
2000..  Sorry....

(See attached file: hpl0811.xls)

 - hpl0811.xls


Your list is very close to mine.  I'm making a list as I go back through the
draft, so I'll update when I get through.

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/01/2000 05:25 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: P.O. Exhibits

I looked through the exhibit package that you sent me.  I have highlighted
the exhibits that believe that  we definitely need.  I also listed some other
potential exhibits.  What are your thoughts on our specific requirements?

Exhibit A (Purchase Amount)--I assume that we need this schedule.
Exhibit A-1 (Contractors Affidavit)--Do we need?
Exhibit A-2 (Lien Waiver)--Do we need?
Exhibit B (Work Schedule)--I assume that we don't need this Exhibit as the
schedule is to be agreed?
Exhibit C (Seller Scope of Work)--I assume that we will attach a schedule
similar to the scope division document that we have exchanged with FCE
Exhibit C-1 (Contractor Clarifications)--Do we need this exhibit?
Exhibit C-2 (Unit Scope of Supply)--Can this document be combined with the
specifications?
Exhibit C-3 (Training)--I assume that we need this schedule?
Exhibit D (Subcontractors)--Do we need?
Exhibit E (Fuel Specifications)--I assume that we need.
Exhibit F Performance Guarantees)--Do we need since it is in the body of the
agreement?
Exhibit G (LDs)--N/A
Exhibit H (Performance Tests)--We are currently working on a draft.
Exhibit H-1 (Output & Heat Rate)--Contained in H.
Exhibit H-2 (Sound)--Should be incorporated into Exhibit H.
Exhibit H-3 (Emissions)--Should be incorporated into Exhibit H.
Exhibit H-4 (Ready for Test)--Do we need?
Exhibit I (Insurance)--Do we need?
Exhibit J (Enron Guaranty)--Do we need?
Exhibit K (Site Plan)--N/A.
Exhibit L (Seller Guarantee)--Do we need to cover advance delay payments?
Exhibit M (Governmental)--Do we need?
Exhibit N (Owner Obligations)--We need.
Exhibit O (Change Order)--Do we need?
Exhibit P (Specs)--Probably need to be conceptual design.

Additional Exhibits
1.  Form of Release.
2.  Water Specifications.
3.  Degradation Curves.


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011214.txt


Chaundra, FIRST THING TUESDAY AM, please print all of these out.  Then
prepare 3 collated sets and distribute to me , Sara and Stuart.  Thank you.
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 05:28 PM -----

	Brian Schwertner@ENRON
	09/01/2000 04:48 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Updated: Raptor Public Company information

Attached are the UPDATED proposal sheets and the UPDATEDstock ownership
calculation for all the public companies that are involved with the Raptor I
transaction.

UPDATED proposal sheets:

These sheets now include the strike price as requested by Mary, and also the
changes noted by Stuart.

Stock ownership calculation:

Mary,

This now includes the information regarding Active Energy.  You will see on
the schedule the information as of 8/3/00 and as of 8/8/00 the IPO date.

Brian Schwertner
3-7576


This is a post-only mailing.  Please do not respond to this message.

Click here www.aei.org/inv010614.htm to register online.

Thursday, June 14, 2001, 10:00-11:30 a.m.
Wohlstetter Conference Center, Twelfth Floor, AEI

In response to the recent electricity price increases in California, Gov. Gray Davis has called on the federal government to cap electricity prices in the western United States. However, price caps have traditionally led to shortages and other negative economic consequences. At this seminar, leading economists will discuss the causes of the crisis and will debate policies that have been proposed to combat the soaring energy costs and frequent power outages associated with the crisis.

9:45 a.m.
Registration

10:00
Introduction:  	KEVIN A. HASSETT, AEI

Panelists:	                SEVERIN BORENSTEIN, University of California at
                                Berkeley
                                JERRY HAUSMAN, Massachusetts Institute of
                                Technology
                                WILLIAM HOGAN, Harvard University

Moderator: 	HAROLD FURCHTGOTT-ROTH, AEI

11:30		Adjournment
___________________________________________________________

I will attend the seminar on June 14.

Name:

Title:

Affiliation:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Telephone:

Fax:

E-mail:

__ Please check if this is a new address.

You may register online at www.aei.org/inv010614.htm, or fax this form to 202.862.7171, or mail this form to Conferences, American Enterprise Institute, 1150 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036.

For additional information, please contact Jessica Pohl at 202.828.6025.
If you do not wish to receive e-mail notifications and invitations in the future, please e-mail seminar@aei.org and your name will be removed from our email lists.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Williams/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
01:19 PM ---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/11/2000 01:10 PM
To: Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GAS DEAL w/Oregon Steel Mills

Gas team,

Dave Fuller in West Origination is trying to get the credit requirements for
the following 3 year gas financial deal:

Term:  01/01/2001 thru 12/31/2003
Volumes:  7,500MMBtu/day
ENA pays float (Sumas Inside Ferc)
CP pays fixed ($$$$???)

Since I need to get the fixed price for this deal, hypothectically though,
the cp is a "credit upfront" customer.  Assuming prevailing market prices,
what would your estimated Letter of Credit be for the deal above?  I've sent
a cws to legal for a draft ISDA.

Quick response appreciated.  Please let me know if you need more info to swag
this L/C.  I would assume that we need lots of cushion should the market tank.

Tracy


The Government of Alberta Power Purchase Arrangement Auction of the regulated
generation Plants and Units commenced Wednesday, August 2nd, and will
continue through a number of rounds over a number of days and possibly
weeks.  Enron Canada Power Corp. (ECPC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron
Canada Corp., is an Invited Bidder participating in the Auction.  For
strategic corporate purposes and as a result of restrictions imposed under
the Auction Participation Agreement and the Auction Rules (compliance with
which is secured by a US$27MM Bid Deposit), any information, details or
speculation regarding ECPC's involvement in the Auction, including whether
ECPC is participating or continuing to participate in the Auction or has
withdrawn from the Auction at any time, the Plants or Units ECPC is or is not
bidding on, the amounts ECPC is bidding or is approved for bidding, and any
other information whatsoever about the Auction process is to be kept strictly
confidential.  In particular, the Auction has been followed closely by the
media and may be of interest to shareholders, investors and other
constituents, and such communications are prohibited until after the Auction
has been completed and the Winning Bidders have been announced by the
Government of Alberta.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Peter Keohane, Enron
Canada Corp., at 403-974-6923 or Peter.Keohane@enron.com.


The attached can act as a starting point for discussions around Enron's purchase of Pioneer's Powder River Basin Methane supplies.

Once you have reviewed it please give me a call at 303-575-6473 and we can discuss it.


Dear Bob and Dave,

Following our review of the website text today, Louise has asked me to flag a
business process requirement in respect of the Contact EnronOnline.

It has been decided to remove the reference and hotlink to the Legal &
Privacy statement from underneath the "I would like to request a Guest
Read-Only account" wording in Section 4 of the website text.  As a result, we
need to ensure, as part of the business process, that there is text in the
email which is sent out to the party requesting a Guest Account stating that
the Guest Accounts are bound by the Legal & Privacy statement.

If you have any queries please feel free to contact myself or Justin.

Regards, Edmund.


Neil,

You have my proxy.  Please let Anthony know what you think.

Thanks,

Kay

Anthony,

Venison would be tough to swallow without teeth.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

ACastellese@Technip.Com on 12/07/2000 07:19:07 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: deer

Since I bought Bobbi a spot on the deer lease we have a total of 6 deer to
kill this year. If you want more than one deer your welcome to it. 6 is way
more than we can eat. Unless we skip breast feeding and start the baby on
deer meat.

How do you want it processed?  1 or 2 deer?

Italian Sausage
Smoked Sausage - Mild-Medium-Hot
Pan Sausage - Mild-Medium-Hot
Hamburger

Kay.Mann@enron.com on 12/06/2000 04:08:12 PM

To:   ACastellese@Technip.Com
cc:
Subject:  Re: deer

yes please


The $5 million is strictly an internal trading #, and is irrelevant from an acct. standpoint.   We can ignore it for the DASH.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Bills, Lisa
Subject:	New Albany - Preparation of the FASH

Kevin,

In connection with Lisa's preparation of the FASH for this transaction, she has asked whether there are any "hedges" that need to be unwound.  I told her that from our conversations, I was of the opinion that there were (approx. $5,000,000 in costs associated with the unwind).  Please confirm.

Stuart