The only valid "Buyback" ticket for Meter #: 1373 is Sitara Ticket #:
246408.  S. Ticket #: 156342 is an old ticket which was used to set up
Buyback
       ticket across Equistar's meters{1552,1384,1062,1553}. If  you recall
this process was done to enable Client Services to automate Equistar
       allocation/billing. The project took place around April 2000
production retroactive back to Jan. 1999.  The link to compute the buyback is
set up
       on S. ticket # 246408.

       Since Equistar has begun doing business via ENA, it was necessary to
establish a "Buyback Ticket " on ENA's Matrix.
       Thus, to answer your question, yes there should only be one "buyback
ticket" for meter #: 1373 on HPL  and ENA.

       ENA activity is kept whole and the swing is on HPL.

       I hope I have addressed all of your questions below however, I am
available for follow up discussion if needed.

       It  has been a pleasure working with you. I learned a lot about the
business while scheduling industrials and thanks for the opportunity.

Daren J Farmer
09/07/2000 08:32 AM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Equistar Buybacks

Robert,

There are three buy back tickets in Sitara for Equistar at mtr 1373.  Two for
HPL and one under ENA.  Shouldn't we have only one buyback for each company?
Also, how do you have the meter set up to allocate between the ENA contract
and HPL contract?

D


Company name:    Spear Leeds & Kellogg
New York (Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, Headquarters)
120 Broadway
6th Floor
New York, NY 10271
Main Phone: (212) 433-7000

Contact Neil Desena
email  ndesena@slk.com


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2007  JAN 30,2002       2:01 PACIFIC      05:01 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Design Pushes
Renewed Interest in Worldwide Nuclear Power Generation, in an Advisory
by Industrialinfo.com

    Business/Energy Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 30, 2002--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources, Inc;
Houston): The rehabilitation of nuclear power generation plants, which
could represent part of the answer to world's power generation needs
over the next 30 years, has taken a few steps forward in the
consciousness of governments and industry in the past six months.
However, nuclear power still has a way to go among environmental
groups and those involved with post-Chernobyl public health concerns.
	   The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) from Eskom in South Africa
continues to claim the attention of both the large power hungry
regions and the capital conscious development areas to which the
modular and smaller output plant could be both affordable and
appropriate.
	   Stakeholders in the project include the U.S. company Exelon with
12.5%, Eskom with 30%, British Nuclear Fuels with 22.5%, Industrial
Development Corporation of SA with 25%, and Black empowerment at 10%.
Currently, Exelon is negotiating for the possible purchase of 40 PBMRs
at a price of around $6 billion (USD). Early in 2001 the company
requested the U.S. National Regulatory Commission to start laying the
groundwork for PBMR licensing.
	   Exelon would like to see the $300 million demonstration unit,
which is planned by Eskom in South Africa as a proven model, to show
that all technical matters have been resolved and that safety,
efficiency and viability are proven enough for U.S. regulatory
agencies to proceed forward with licensing. The plant is to be built
alongside the existing nuclear power station at Koeberg in the Cape
Province of South Africa with work commencing in 2003. If approved,
Exelon may then start concurrent construction of U.S. sites to bring
PBMR-generated power to market at the earliest possible date and at
the best price. Specifications and claims by Eskom, who purchased the
technology after a 21-year development and proving period in Germany,
present the PBMR as small, safe, clean, cost efficient, inexpensive
and adaptable.
	   The PBMR uses multiple coated uranium particles encased in
graphite to form a fuel sphere (60mm in diameter). The PBMR design
makes use of helium as the coolant and energy transfer medium to a
closed cycle gas turbine and generator. The design differences between
the PBMR and Pressurized Water Reactors result in the PBMR being a
safe and economical power plant.
	   The annual world market for power generation is estimated at $70
billion. The PBMR, if it comes through its regulatory trials, would be
in a position to capture a tasty slice of this power action. With 10%
of the shareholding in the PBMR project reserved for new black
empowerment shareholders, 10 plant export orders a year could
contribute nearly $1 billion a year to South Africa's Gross Domestic
Product and another $1 billion in export income. An estimated 57,000
direct and indirect jobs would be created. These figures would double
and triple for 20 or 30 orders annually. If the demo plant achieves
its targets, Eskom will place an order for 10 modules, with the Exelon
order hopefully kicking in immediately for a possible date for the
first U.S. plant in 2007.
	   Eskom will sell PBMR's as a manufactured item with no rights
given. Eighty percent of the costs will be made up of the manufactured
reactor and 20% site construction related. The aim is for 40% of the
sourcing to come from South Africa. Taxpayers money (approximately $50
million so far) is being spent by the South African authorities in
giving all due diligence to the studies and to public feedback on the
project before the "go" decision is given. With this right and proper
concern and the considerable market presence of Eskom and Exelon the
130MW modules will no doubt play a crucial role in the future of
nuclear power generation.
	   The project managers are indicating growing confidence in their
ability to bring the product to market and have recently made a
significant move. A contract has been placed (in mid-January 2002)
with the U.S. company Stone & Webster and South African construction
company Murray & Roberts and black empowerment contractor Proman
Management Services to provide consulting services to the PBMR project
in engineering, procurement, construction management and project
management. Following this development, the PBMR management at Eskom
have gone on record to state that with the multi-national and
multi-disciplinary support now providing leverage, the approval
hurdles for the pilot project should be cleared by the end of 2002
given the crucial general diligence and environmental clearance by the
government.
	   Industrailinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the Energy and Power markets as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at www.industrialinfo.com or
www.iirenergy.com.

    --30--MJB/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources, Houston
             Britt Burt, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS SOUTH AFRICA GERMANY INTERNATIONAL EUROPE
AFRICA/MIDDLE EAST
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION ENERGY OIL/GAS UTILITIES
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.
- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Rakesh,

To confirm our conversation:

Please, go ahead and buy a copy.

Vince

Rakesh Bharati@ENRON
03/29/2001 02:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Vince,

Tanya and I feel that there is a need for a constrained optimization routine
for our VAR related research.   Numerical recipes does not contain
subroutines where equality and inequality contraints can be easily
incorporated.  Also, the number of arguments that can be handled is also
limited.

IMSL provides a comprehensive library of more than 300 C/C++  statistical and
mathematical analysis functions.  We think that it would be of great value to
our efforts and to the efforts of our research group.  Presently the cost is
aproximately around $1500 and Mike Bothwell (Visual Numerics Rep) assures us
as the version is not license protected, we all can use it as long as
simultaneous usage is within the license.

Please let me know if you should need further information.

Thanks,

Rakesh

---------------------- Forwarded by Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Mike Bothwell <mbothwell@houston.vni.com> on 03/29/2001 12:56:03 PM
To: "'Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com'" <Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Rakesh, I'm just following up to see how things looked on this.  Any change
in status?  Let me know I can furhter help you.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor

Rakesh,

As we discussed, the CNL 4.0 PC libraries are not license managed.  Version
5 will be.  The PC Version 4.0 can be installed on a network drive and
called from networked PCs.  As expected, we would ask that Enron honor the
license agreement by allowing only the number of simultaneous uses permitted
by the license.  Version 5.0 will be license managed and can be licensed as
node locked or floating.

With regard to Unix licensing, the current version of CNL for Unix is
license managed.  It can be licensed as node locked or floating.  If you
install the libraries on a Unix server as node locked, the number of
simultaneous sessions on that server is not limited except by the
capabilities of the machine.  A floating Unix license would be checked out
by the individual user to be executed on a local machine.

Also as mentioned, your investment is protected by allowing you to upgrade
in the future by paying only the price difference between your current and
desired platforms.  This upgrade option only applies to licenses covered
under support.

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.  I look forward to
providing you the best math and statistical libraries available today to
help you solve your problems and understand your data.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor


This will confirm that HPL wants a jury trial. Sorry I did not get back to
you sooner.


I realize both of you are probably crazy busy, but I thought I'd drop a
line. I hope everything is going OK during the upheaval.

I have a very good argument (and paper by an academic) to send you regarding
market power analysis for the Enron-Dynegy merger approval process if you
are involved in all of that. Seems like the FERC is going to be trying very
hard to figure out how to do this.

All the best,

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


I found a more updated version than the one I sent you yesterday.

Best regards

---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 10/17/2000 07:55
AM ---------------------------

Marcelo Parra@MGUSA
10/05/2000 04:04 PM
To: Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Louis
Colarusso/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tom McKeever/EU/Enron@MGLTD

Subject: MG Future structure

Tim,
As discussed, please find attached an updated version of the Enron Metals
North America Structure.  It includes the Brokerage business and updates the
Merchanting operations.  Please review and provide your comments.  I would
like to finalize this and begin the formal implementation of these changes as
soon as possible.

Best regards,
Marcelo
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
E-Mail: Marcelo.Parra@enron.com


Here is a revised version - let me know what you think.


This is from Carol Word, she is working on the Prayer List and will send it
shortly.

Hello all.  My husband and I just returned from a trip to the Alsace region
of France over the Thanksgiving holiday and I thought I would pass on a
little something that applies to the Christmas season I learned.

Alsace lies at the It seems the tradition of decorating a tree for Christmas
began in this area (if there were no borders it would be part of the Black
Forest region of Germany).  The Alsacians are a generous, hardworking,
loving people as a whole.  Many wonderful people have come from this region.
One of the greatest is Dr. Albert Schweitzer.  Dr. Schweitzer began as a
master organist, built them actually and wrote books about them.  Then, he
felt called to the ministry and was a pastor with a compassionate heart.  He
was in Paris at a missions conference and was moved to hear of the tribes in
Africa, lost, without hope, practically no medical care and felt the Holy
Spirit move in his life once again.  He studied medicine and he, his wife
and a team of compassionate men and women moved to Gabon on the West Coast
of Africa and opened a hospital.  There, they cared for the sick in body and
spirit.

The tradition of the Christmas tree began in the early 1500's.  There was a
pastor who was coming home in the early winter evening having visited a
parishioner.  It was nearing the time of celebrating the Birth of Jesus.  As
he made his way through the dark woods, he came upon a fir tree bathed in
light.  It seemed a star sat upon the top of the tree.  The sight held such
wonder that he wanted to share it with his family.  Then, he began to see
the true story and felt that maybe it was not just coincidence that he
happened up that sight.  He cut the tree and began to dress it up in red
with white candles for his church and here is what he told the people (in my
words of course):

The tree is to remind us why Jesus came.  He came to die upon the tree for
our freedom.  The evergreen represents life even when death is all around
(all the other trees loose their leaves and "die") but only the evergreen
goes against the flow.  Its life flows from deep within.  The life of the
Christian flows from deep within.  So, the tree represents life.

The red ribbons and bow represent His Blood shed for us.  The scarlet ribbon
that covers the tree as His Blood that covers our sins.

The white candles represent (1) purity - we are cleansed and made pure
through the shed blood upon the tree, and (2) Light - that Jesus is the
Light of the World and the light on the tree is the Light on our lives.  He
said WE are the light of the world when we allow Him to live in us.

As time passed, all kinds of things have been added and the REAL purpose of
the tree has been forgotten.  One more VERY important thing that is added to
a European tree is the manger.  It is set up under the tree in the center
with a place of prominence.  Usually, the Christ Child is not added until
Christmas morning.  The tree in Europe is left in place until January when
the Three Wise Men came from the east to worship the King and this is when
gifts are usually exchanged.

While I love the giving (and the getting!) and the gathering and the eating
all the fun things that go with Christmas as much as the next person and
maybe more than some, I would like to encourage us all as we enter the
season.  If you have an artificial or real tree, a "color theme" or mix and
match, as you set the tree, remember Who died on a tree for you and your
home.  Let it represent in your home His sacrifice on the bare tree.  Let's
pray for the opportunity to witness in a different way to our unsaved
friends and family.  If you have a tree in your home this year, and you have
unsaved family, as you decorate it, each time you admire it, pray

"Father, let this tree represent You in this home.  Let Your Light shine
through me.  Let me share Your gifts You have given me with those You place
in my path.  As I wrap each present, I pray Your anointing goes with that
gift.  Let the sweater, the scarf, the article of clothes represent Your
covering over that loved one.  Let that toy bring joy to that child and open
a way for me to minister in a fresh way to that young heart.  Each time the
keyboard on that computer is touched, as I touch it, Lord, I know Your
Spirit linger there as it did for Elijah on that bed and the child was
raised.  I want Your resurrection power to flow through me to each person
You have given me to care for.  As I hang ornaments on the tree, let each
one represent a habit, a fear, a concern, a pain, a past unforgiven, a
sickness, a financial burden, a child, a husband, a wife, a future unknown
and uncertain, and the act of hanging be an act of faith of hanging it on
the cross.  An act of placing that care in Your capable Hands.  As the
lights are strung on the tree and home, let Your light shine through me.
Let my home be a beacon of Your Love in a dark, hurting, crying, sighing,
dying world.  As I meet with friends and family and reach out to hug, let my
arms be Your Arms reaching out in love.  Use me, mold me, make me what I
ought to be so I can be more like You.  In Jesus' Name...Amen!"

Just a thought I wanted to share.  We have a chance to make a real
difference in our homes as we allow Jesus to make a difference in our
hearts.

I love you all....Carol Word


It may be too late now, but I would like to meet with them.  Mark

	Peter Keohane
	03/12/2001 06:00 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Visit By Donahue Ernst and Young

As I mentioned DEY representatives will be in Houston March 19/20 and wanted
to meet with you and Jim Derrick.  Jim is not available, but they were
wondering if they could meet with you.  Given Jim's position on these types
of firms, Jim's unavailability, and your schedule do you have any interest in
meeting with them?  Peter.


I think the changes look worse than they are.

I hope these are acceptable to you.

robert
 <<NDA with Enron_.doc>>

 - NDA with Enron_.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2001 10:15
AM ---------------------------

Bill Williams@ECT
04/24/2001 10:03 AM
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "THOMAS CONSTANTINE" <TCONSTAN@LLGM.COM>, chriscobb@akllp.com, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: GE and ABB comments

DO NOT PUT THE CONTRACTOR COMMENTS IN THE B/O CONTRACTS.

I sent a copy to Lee Johnson when first received.  I asked Lee if the
comments had any merit.  (Mostly pertaining to scope of supply comments.)  I
have not heard back from Lee.

I would expect Lee to let me know if any of the comments would have needed to
be incorporated.


When you get a moment


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude21.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas21.pdf

No distillate or unleaded charts today.

Dec WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz-qoz.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG21.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG21.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL21.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


but that's my point.  the demand destruction roared its ugly head beginning
of Jan.  The price level was $9.  Of course there is a lag.  Let's make up a
lag time...say one month.   On Dec 1 cash was trading $6.70.  Probably a
similar lag on the way down.  Cash is $5.20 today.  How much lost demand will
there be in a month if we're still $5.2?   million dollar question if you can
answer that.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/27/2001 08:12:32 PM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: mkts

off the cuff i wud say tho same goes for 5.00 gas-currently 6-7 bcf/day swing
y
on y too much, to buy this level you need to take the view that industrial
america and residential and end users will be able to get back on their feet
and
recocover a lion share of the 4-4.5 bcf/d demand destruction(this assumes as
current. very little if any dist fuel switching. i think the answer is no-not
unless the economy was jump starter quickly-2nd q is gone,so maybe th 4q.
 remember the demand destruction and industrial shit really just started only
6
weeks ago-me thinks it will take longer than that to get back into full swing.
we all trade the y on y gap...all things remaining equal(ie term px for the
summer), starting april we'll have a surplus the other way by july barring a
greenhouse in the ohio valley
    good to hear your view pt as always-even if it is wrong!!! ha

John.Arnold@enron.com on 02/27/2001 08:23:22 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: mkts

Good to hear from you.
After a great F, had an okay G.  Held a lot of term length on the
risk/reward play.  Figured if we got no weather, all the customer and
generator buying would be my stop.  It was.  Amazing that for the drop in
price in H, the strips have really gone nowhere.  just a big chop fest.
i here your arguments, but think they are way exagerated.  Agree with 1.5-2
bcf/d more supply. Call it 2 with LNG.  Imports from Canada should be
negligible.  Now let's assume price for the summer is $4.  No switching,
full liquids extraction, methanol and fertilizer running.  Electric
generation demand, considering problems in west and very low hydro, around
1.5 bcf/d greater this year with normal weather.  Means you have to price 2
bcf/d out of market.  Don't think $4 does that.  What level did we start
really losing demand last year?  It was higher than 4.   concerned about
recession in industrial sector thats occuring right now.
Think gas is fairly valued here.  Dont think we're going to 7.  But I think
fear of market considering what happened this past year will keep forward
curve very well supported through spring.  we're already into storage
economics so the front goes where the forward curve wants to go.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/26/2001 04:48:06 PM

To:   jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  mkts

its been a while-hope all is well. not a great few weeks for me in ngas-not
awful just nothing really working for me and as you know got in front of
march/apr a cupla times, no disasters.
   well im bearish-i hate to be so after a 4 buck drop but as i said a
month ago
to you-and now pira coming around. 5.00 gas is a disaster for the natgas
demand.
now production up strongly y on y...you guys agree on the production side?
  i know youve been bullish the summer-think im stll in the minority-but
here
you go, we have y on y supplly up 2/bcf+ demnad loss 3.5bcf/d, 5.5 bcf/day
y on
y swing . then i submit as we started to see due huge rate increases R/C
demandd
energy conservation will be even more dramatic this summer which will
effect
utilty demand/power demand ulitmately.  if pira rite we lost 1.56 in jan
for
this factor i say it cud be bigger this summer as ute loads increase, power
pxes
rise and consumers become poorer. there will be more demand flexibilty in
the
summer part in the midcon and north as AC is more of a luxury item than
heat. i
say 5-6% lower use in residentail/utilty power consumption due rationing is
another .7/1bcf/d loss.
  put all this together we wud build an addional 1284 apr thru oct on top
of
last years 1715  build basis last year temps and todays prices. takes us to
3.6
tcf or so. what am i missing my man-summer has to go to 4 bucks or lower to
restore demand??? thots.

as far as that other thing, the p&c its still alive, shud know more soon
and ill
keep you posted.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
05:20 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
11/13/2000 04:59 PM
To: Jennifer Baer <jbaer1@maine.rr.com>, "Amanda Barnard"
<ajbarnard@houston.rr.com>, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bythewood
<rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com>, "derek
campbell" <derek.campbell@paslode.com>, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, maxnbev@wesnet.com (Max Fledderjohann), "garynkay"
<GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
kristi.giron@cfisd.net, "Keeling, Ingelisa" <ikeeling@velaw.com>, "B. Kenne"
<yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @ ENRON, "Ray Vincent" <raylvincent@hotmail.com> @
ENRON, Mark Troyer <mtroyer@swbell.net>, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Wilson
<gxwilson@us.oracle.com>, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ed Zajicek
<e.zajicek@pentasafe.com>, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------
From: Sheri Thomas on 11/13/2000 04:48 PM
To: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

wow...kind of says it all, doesn't it?
ST
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 04:46
PM ---------------------------

<Jennifer_Lamprecht@oxy.com> on 11/13/2000 02:25:42 PM
To: Chis.Gales@Compaq.com, jeff_chapman@mentorg.com,
rwalls@lgl.ci.houston.tx.us, sheri.thomas@enron.com, tkuyken@enron.com,
Derek_Hawkins@oxy.com, Ian_Johnston@oxy.com, Jerry_Lanier@oxy.com,
Jim_Lipka@oxy.com, Gail_Rudloff@oxy.com, Gordon_Wilkinson@oxy.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tripp, Tracey [mailto:Tracey.Tripp@ENRON.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Tracey.Tripp@ENRON.com]>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 1:24 PM
To: CandMSERV (E-mail); Hank Tripp (E-mail); Heather Beken (E-mail);
Jennifer Lamprecht (E-mail); Judy Tripp (E-mail); Kara Babers (E-mail);
Megan Butler (E-mail); Randy Hounsel (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

 <<county total.jpg>> How scary!
<<county total.jpg>>
Regards,
Tracey Tripp
Enron Global Messaging
713.853.1606

 - county total.jpg


Dan,

I am sending Energy one Ventures BAC agreement.  Please make the appropriate
marks.

Thanks,

Sylvia Pollan
---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

"Owens, Kathie" <KOwens@UtiliCorp.com> on 03/27/2001 01:05:59 PM
To: "'sylvia.s.pollan@enron.com'" <sylvia.s.pollan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: BAC agreement

Sylvia,
Attached is the agreement that was sent to you.
Any questions, call me.  402-926-5291.
Thanks,
Kathie

 <<ENR-EOV-1.doc>>

 - ENR-EOV-1.doc


Barry, the re-org announcement is being drafted to indicate that the West and Texas are not affected.  In that announcement is it you and Mike or you and Phillip or you, Mike and Phillip that are leading the West ?

Frank


All:

	The West requested that we reschedule these meetings to 1:30 CST so as not to conflict with lunch in Portland.

Regards,
Bill (x53492)

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:


Isabel,

Please confirm before 830 central this morning (when GE's rep will be in my
office to sign docs) that these documents have final approval of GE's
counsel, as I believe Kent is not available to review documents today.
Obviously, I cannot present revised documents to a commercial representative
of GE without knowing that his lawyer has signed off on the documents, except
to the extent that the changes are obviously minor.

Kay

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 01:47:15 AM
To: "Kent Shoemaker (E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Rick Vicens
(E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "John Tisdale (E-mail)"
<jtisdale@arclightcapital.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>,
"Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Pegasus - GE Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

We attach clean and blacklined copies of the following:

(a) the GE Consent and Agreement;
(b) the GE opinion;
(c) the GE Letter Agreement; and
(d) the GE receipt of funds letter.

We would be grateful for your confirmation that these documents are in final
form.

Regards
Isabel

 - COMPARE004.DOC
 - NY003700033.DOC
 - NY003701281.DOC
 - COMPARE003.DOC
 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003699615.DOC
 - COMPARE002.DOC
 - NY003700961.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Steve Meheen <Steve.Meheen@merlinproduction.com> on 01/29/2001 10:14:33 AM
To: "'Mike.McConnell@enron.com'" <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc: Bob Fulton <Robert.Fulton@merlinproduction.com>
Subject: LNG Facilities

Dear Mr. McConnell,

After reading this mornings Wall Street Journal article with interest, I
thought it appropriate to write you, introducing our firm to you and our LNG
facilities.

Coincidently, we had talked to our friends at Vinson and Elkins a few weeks
ago about an introduction to the right person in Enron to discuss our LNG
projects with.

I am sending by courier hard copies of the items attached to this e-mail.

We look forward to meeting you, and discussing the LNG opportunities in
greater detail.

Yours faithfully,

Steve Meheen

 <<LNG Brochure 1-29-00.PDF>>  <<McConnell ltr (29Jan01).doc>>  <<MIM dec
2000 rev7 portrait small_.doc>>

 - LNG Brochure 1-29-00.PDF
 - McConnell ltr (29Jan01).doc
 - MIM dec 2000 rev7 portrait small_.doc


I will remove the open season reference.  Some pipeline tariffs do refer to
open season for capacity release, but it may cause confusion so probably to
remove it.

The terms you referenced are defined in the product description.  The EOL
access agreement makes it clear that the product description is binding on
the counterparty.

	Colleen Sullivan
	11/06/2000 12:42 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl
Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: New Product--Suggested Language Changes

Last week I sent copies of the product description and GTC to Becky Cantrell
(regulatory) for comments and she did make a couple of suggestions which I
agree with.  First, in both the description and the original GTC we refer to
an open season; however, this product is for capacity release, which would
not be subject to an open season--only bidding.  So, Gerald, unless you have
some objection that we have overlooked, I believe it is appropriate to remove
the words "or open season" in the product description.  Regarding the GTC,
since we were planning on eliminating Paragraph 3 anyway, which had the open
season reference, I think that one is already taken care of.

The other question she had is how we would define the following terms and how
they would be made a part of the contract:  Reference Pipeline, Rate
Schedule, Primary Receipt and Delivery Point.  Please let me know your
thoughts on this.


Please send any comments directly to Peggy.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
07:29 AM ---------------------------

Peggy Mahoney@EES
05/24/2001 12:32 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES,
Elizabeth Ivers/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Koenig/Enron@EnronXGate, Paula
Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Max Eberts/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Draft - Background and Q&A for CA residential customers

Attached is the first Q&A draft.  Please review, add questions, edit, etc.
This will be used as a guide for media and government affairs responses.

Evan/Diann - It needs to be tailored for use as a customer service script.
There are some blanks we could use your help on - noted in blue.

Max Eberts at 58804 and Beth Tilney at 35022 will be the contacts for edits
via email or by phone.  I will call-in when I arrive in Washington at about
1:30pm.

Thanks
Peggy


Sara, Cheryl and Marie,
This is the documentation for the Executing Broker relationship with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.  This is for ECT Investments, Inc. only and should be for BS, MSDW and GS as clearing brokers.
Thanks. Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wallendorf, JeanMarie" <JWallendorf@kbw.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Wallendorf+2C+20JeanMarie+22+20+3CJWallendorf+40kbw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Glover, Sheila
Subject:	NEW ACCOUNT PAPERWORK

Sheila,

This is the account paperwork that we spoke about. If something does not
apply let me know. The legal contact is Karen Jackson (212)323-8509.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. (212)323-8450
 <<Corp Res.pdf>>  <<FREERIDING>>  <<DVPWORKSHEET>>  <<Full Trading
Authorization.doc>>

> Thank You,
> Jeanmarie Wallendorf
>
>
>
> This communication is confidential and is intended solely for the
> addressee.  It is not to be forwarded to any other person or copied
> without the permission of the sender.  Please notify the sender in the
> event you have received this communication in error.  This communication
> is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any
> securities discussed herein.  Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. makes no
> representation as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained
> in this communication.
>
>
>

 - Corp Res.pdf
 - FREERIDING
 - DVPWORKSHEET
 - Full Trading Authorization.doc


Pat,

I think that we should probably send the newest people to the first
training.  What do you think?

Liz, Susan, Mary, Sabrae?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
09/12/2000 03:25 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Daren

The number of interested people turned out to be larger than the room can
handle.  Can you just send 3 or 4 for this meeting and I will set up a
secondary date for the others.

Thanks
Russ
x37386
---------------------- Forwarded by Russ Severson/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
09/08/2000 02:14 PM
To: Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz Bellamy/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabrae
Zajac/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Hadix/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eddie
Janzen/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Russ,

I would like for the following people from the Texas region to attend:

Liz Bellamy
Sabrae Zajak
Mary Poorman
Susan Hadix
Tom Acton
Mark McCoy
Eddie Janzen

Let me know if this group is too large and move some to a later date.  Thanks.

D

Russ Severson
09/08/2000 08:53 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA TRAINING

I will be giving a training session on Wed   9/13/00  in 21C2 from 3:00-4:30
pm.
I would like for you to send to the class any new logistics personnel that
you might think could use a Sitara overview.
If someone cannot make it at this time, let me know their names and I will
try to schedule something for them at a later time.

If possible, please send me a note on who might be attending, so I can get an
approximate head count.

Call me or e-mail me if you have any questions

Russ
x37386


If you're receiving this email its because we're still waiting on a response from you.  Please reply to this message ASAP.  See below for details.

Thanks,

Dan

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop (stand alone computer).

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


ihad the wrong  guy...he thinks you look like the guy on the  right
 - bff.bmp


Barry sent me a copy of the draft memo announcing his role within EBS.  Since
Scott Pleus is currently in that role and does have people reporting to him
in EBS that are in trading operations, I would suggest that the memo contain
a mention of the transition:

Example:

 Scott Pleus is currently Director of trading operations for EBS.  He will be
transitioning to an origination role within EBS in mid May as Barry Pearce
assumes his responsibilities for EBS.  The current trading staff for EBS will
report to Barry effective with his start date in May.

I also heard from Barry today that Todd Lindholm let him know that he is out
of the picture with regard to commercial support for bandwidth trading
operations and that Barry will report to John Echols.  So sounds as if that
is clarified.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Andrew_M_Ozuna@bankone.com on 03/07/2001 11:41:43 AM
To: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Sagewood Phase II

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew M Ozuna/TX/BANCONE on 03/07/2001
01:41 PM ---------------------------

Andrew M Ozuna
03/06/2001 03:14 PM

To:   "George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
cc:
Subject:  Sagewood Phase II

George,

Thank you for the opportunity to review your financing request for the
Sagewood
Phase II project.  Upon receipt of all the requested information regarding the
project, we completed somewhat of a due diligence on the market.  There are a
number of concerns which need to be addressed prior to the Bank moving forward
on the transaction.  First, the pro-forma rental rates, when compared on a
Bedroom to Bedroom basis, are high relative to the market.   We adjusted
pro-forma downward to match the market rates and the rates per bedroom we are
acheiving on the existing Sagewood project.  Additionally, there are about
500+
units coming on-line within the next 12 months in the City of San Marcos,
this,
we believe will causes some downward rent pressures which can have a serious
effect on an over leveraged project.  We have therefore adjusted the requested
loan amount to $8,868,000.

I have summarized our issues as follows:

1.  Pro-forma rental rates were adjusted downward to market as follows:

     Pro-Forma                           Bank's Adjustment
     Unit           Unit Rent Rent/BR    Unit Rent      Rent/BR
     2 BR/2.5 BA         $1,150          $575           $950           $475
     3 BR/Unit      $1,530         $510       $1,250         $417

2.  Pro-forma expenses were increased to include a $350/unit reserve for unit
turn over.

3.  A market vacancy factor of 5% was applied to Potential Gross Income (PGI).

4.  Based on the Bank's revised N.O.I. of $1,075,000, the project can support
debt in the amount of $8,868,000, and maintain our loan parameters of 1.25x
debt
coverage ratio, on a 25 year amo., and 8.60% phantom interest rate.

5.  The debt service will be approx. $874,000/year.

6.  Given the debt of $8,868,000, the Borrower will be required to provide
equity of $2,956,000, consisting of the following:

     Land -                   $1,121,670
     Deferred profit& Overhead     $    415,000
     Cash Equity              $1,419,268
     Total                    $2,955,938

7. Equity credit for deferred profit and overhead was limited to a percentage
of
actual hard construction costs.

(See attached file: MAPTTRA.xls)

 - MAPTTRA.xls


Family,
Thought you might enjoy this.
-Mark

> When you thought I wasn't looking (by a child)...
>
>
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw you hang my first painting on the
> refrigerator, and I immediately wanted to paint another one.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking I saw you feed a stray cat, and I
> learned that it was good to be kind to animals.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw you make my favorite cake for me
> and I learned that the little things can be the special things in life.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking I heard you say a prayer, and I knew
> there is a God I could always talk to and I learned to trust in God.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw you make a meal and take it to a
> friend who was sick, and I learned that we all have to help take care of
> each other.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw you give of your time and money
> to help people who had nothing and I learned that those who have something
> should  give to those who don't.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I felt you kiss me good night and I
> felt loved and safe.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw you take care of our house and
> everyone in it and I learned we have to take care of what we are given.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw how you handled your
> responsibilities, even when you didn't feel good and I learned that I
> would have to be responsible when I grow up.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw tears come from your eyes and I
> learned that sometimes things hurt, but it's all right to cry.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I saw that you cared and I wanted to be
> everything that I could be.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I learned most of life's lessons that I
> need to know to be a good and productive person when I grow up.
>
> When you thought I wasn't looking, I looked at you and wanted to say,
> "Thanks for all the things I saw when you thought I wasn't looking."
>


Yes, Dennis, we got it by e-mail and fax.  Thanks.

"Buckley, Dennis" <Buckley@puc.state.pa.us> on 11/30/2000 07:56:07 AM
To: "'kenneth.lay@enron.com'" <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: John Quain Info

 <<points1.doc>>  <<JMQres.doc>>
Rosalie:

Chairman Quain asked me to forward these to Dr. Lay for his consideration.

Please let me know when you get these, and if you can open them.

Thanks!

Dennis J. Buckley
Counsel to the Chairman

 - points1.doc
 - JMQres.doc


Don't worry I'm not going to do it.  Don't I still need to collect from you for the loser's pool.  $60.00

-----Original Message-----
From: jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com
[mailto:jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: RE: football pool 25.00 per person no pay no win!

can you send it on by tomorrow before the game starts?


JULY 7      TECO TAP             120.000/ HPL IFERC
                     LS HPL KATY          30.000/ ENRON

JULY 8   TECO TAP                 40.000/ENRON;             80.000/ HPL IFERC

JULY 9     TECO TAP                 40.000/ENRON ;           80.000/ HPL IFERC


print
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 09:16 AM -----

	Joe Hartsoe
	11/01/2000 11:14 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Order issued by FERC , EL00-95-000

----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000 11:12 AM -----

	"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
	11/01/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>,
<jhartso@enron.com>, <marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Order issued by FERC , EL00-95-000

The order issued from today's meeting is attached.  It is approximately 80
pages.

 - EL00-95.1


Here it is.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/04/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:52 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Here is the attachment...

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 02/03/2000
03:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:51 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Attached is my draft of a request for rehearing.  It incorporates Mr.
Stojic's and Mr. Kelly's initial comments.  Please review it and let me know
if you have any comments on or before Tuesday afternoon (I will be out of the
office Monday).  Thank you!


Following is a summary of the action items we discussed.  There were two items that came up after the meeting that I have added to this list (benchmark server and Frank's portfolio hierarchy draft).

 If I left anything out please respond back to everyone, thanks!

Andrew
x57534

Day1 requirements - RisktRAC operations

1) User List
Need to gather list of all employees that will be using risktRAC for book administration, verify list, then ensure they are setup in the RisktRAC database.
(related to 3) Security Access).

2) Migrate users to Netco
Need to check with network security and/or integration team to find out when the users IDs will be
converted to run on the Netco network.  (Dependency for running RisktRAC on Netco).

3) Security Access
Work with Stephanie to follow up with Security on approval for RisktRAC application: confirm groups and approvers.  	Ensure everyone who does not have RisktRAC will have an e-request submitted.

4) RisktRAC Training
Once users have access to Netco RisktRAC setup timeframe for basic training.  If time permits a hands-on overview could also be arranged, as long as someone can access the Netco RisktRAC from their desk (either user or developer).

5) Website connectivity:
Distribute RAC website URL to Netco employees
(confirmed with Bhupesh - http://rac.netco.enron.com )

6) Disable Spreadsheet Position loading:
In RisktRAC disable the ability to load exotic spreadsheets for Day1 users.

7) Day1 Portfolio Hierarchy
(This step can occur before the books are loaded into RisktRAC.)

Review with Frank Hayden the ideal portfolio hierarchy that should be setup, then have users start building the structure without any associations to real portfolios.
The book-portfolio tie-in will occur with action item 8) Day1 Book-setup Spreadsheet.

8) Day1 Book-setup Spreadsheet
a) Discuss timeline for loading Day1 book data from the book-setup spreadsheet;
    Discuss validation issues and cutoff for loading data.
    Note expected book counts are 164 for Gas and approximately 55 - 60 for Power.

b) Add two columns in the spreadsheet for portfolio creation and hierarchy placement, have users fill in this data with guidance from IT.

9)  Control RisktRAC screen-access
Discuss necessary business groups and screen-access to setup in RisktRAC:  Gas Users, Power Users, Credit Users, Market-Risk Users, any other groups that come to mind.

10)  Book-creation/Portfolio audit:
Develop simple adhoc report to help audit books that are not associated with portfolios.  Discuss validation specifications with Ramesh.

11) Financial checks and balances:
How can reported position/P&L numbers match up with those reported by accounting?  Need to find out who owns the accounting reporting and see if some adhoc verification can be implemented.

Known RisktRAC requirements beyond Day1

1) Desktop RisktRAC portfolio security
Review how to implement portfolio-level security in the RisktRAC that is already present on the RAC website.

2) Benchmark Server:
Review with infrastructure how to migrate a copy of the Benchmark Server to a Netco server.
Debbie and Ramesh to discuss further.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject:	Production Area - Scheduled Maintenance

February 05, 2002

To: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers and
Shippers

Re: Production Area - Scheduled Maintenance

Construction work is scheduled for Transco's Station 35
located in Harris County Texas from mid February until
approximately July 1, 2002.  Depending on the level of firm
transportation requests, Transco may need to limit the
availability of secondary and interruptible transportation
through Station 40 in East Texas. All shippers affected by
any necessary capacity allocation will be notified as soon
as possible.

If you have any questions, please call Terry Fitch at (713)
215-3361 or John McGrath at (713) 215-2514.

Terry C. Fitch
Manager
Gas Operations


Ben/Mike,

Did you guys work out anything on the 12th slot?

Thanks,

Kay


Notice No. 01-405
November 29, 2001

To:	All Exchange Members / Member Firms
	All Exchange Clearing Members

From:	J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

Re:	Exchange Extends EFS Window for Natural Gas

The Exchange will extend the Exchange of Futures for Swaps window for its
Natural Gas Futures contracts until 6:00 P.M., for today's trading session.

Please contact Thomas LaSala at (212) 299-2897 with any questions.


Hi Scott,

I have some questions:

The obligation to try to improve performance  about the specific performance
(ie minimum) standards frequently has a time limit, say 6 months.  Do you
have a sense for the appropriate time period here?  Would it make sense to
require them to work longer on the first 2.0 and 2.4 than the rest?

Will we have a drawing number for a standard foundation design, or will we
need to put words around it.  I know we discussed the need for pilings as the
most significant change.  Do you think that this difference is enough?  Did I
understand that we want them to pay us at the end for non-standard
foundations (as opposed to a credit).

On termination, are we going with the average value no matter what the reason
for termination, with a rep along the lines of whay you wrote, plus some
monitoring ability.

On assignment, they mentioned a corporate guaranty.  I was thinking of using
something broader due to various financing/balance sheet considerations,
perhaps tying it to a guaranty from a BBB rated entity.

Do we want an option to have them store these, which would then impact
payment?

Thanks,

Kay


After having conducted our first of several business reviews, Enron Global
Markets - Office of the Chairman would like to outline the following
organizational changes effective immediately.

The Global Risk Markets group under Jere Overdyke illustrates enormous
opportunities given the size of those businesses.  To better focus on the
different commercial functions and to capture market share and value, the
group is being realigned.  Jere will continue to manage Global Risk Markets
and build on our insurance capabilities.  Mark Tawney is responsible for our
weather business and will now report to the EGM Office of the Chairman.

Brent Price will be joining Enron Global Markets as Vice President of
Operations and Chief Accounting Officer.  He will report to the EGM Office of
the Chairman, and to Sally Beck, Vice President of Global Risk Management
Operations.  In his role as Chief Accounting Officer, Brent will also report
to Rick Causey, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for
Enron Corp.  Reporting to Brent in his new position will be Sheila Glover,
business controller for Financial Products; Todd Hall, business controller
for weather; and Scott Earnest, business controller for global products and
coal.  In addition, Tom Myers will join Brent's management team as Director
of Accounting.  Brent and his team are responsible for all accounting, risk
reporting and trading operations for all the businesses within EGM.

Cindy Skinner will join the Enron Global Markets team with responsibility for
Human Resources.  She will also report to David Oxley and the HR organization.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their assignments.


Think he forgot you on this list!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/29/99 03:05
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           12/29/99 02:49 PM

To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Besancon/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Rodney
Rogers/GCO/Enron@Enron, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Producer Shut-in list for Victoria 18" line work

HPL will be completing tie-ins to replace the Guadalupe River Crossing on the
Swinney to Victoria 18".  The following meters will be shut in at
approximately 8:00 AM on January 4, 2000 and be brought back on-line sometime
during the evening of January 6,2000:

986833  Marks #1 Common Point
989730  Swickheimer
984056  Cologne
985754  Battle Fld
985982  Coletto Creek
986063  Mokeen
986140  Swickheimer
989620  Duty #1
984046  Apache
985547  Freeman
989664  Talber Graham
986757  Sheridan Energy
985972  Hughes & Hughes
986668  Pentex
985541  Esperanza
984724  New Horizons
984959  Dynamic
985360  BNP Petroleum
984143  Hilcorp
984286  Spindletop
985430  Southern Gas
989679  Strand Energy
989663  Edge Petroleum
985801  Vintage
989629  Petro Corporation
986722  Duke Three Rivers Gas Plant
989736  C&E Berclair
989813  C&D Lucas
986725  Southern Resources
986015  Mider
985192  Delhi Sarco

If you have any question please feel free to call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary


Iet me know if I can help. I will be back friday
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Outstanding outcome- Ray, this was an incredible result given the challenging
context, to say the least....You should feel quite proud of this achievment-
Thanks!

Linda Robertson
05/14/2001 01:06 PM
To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Tariffs Approved

Excellent, and congratulations.

	Ray Alvarez
	05/14/2001 12:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Tariffs Approved

The rate case that the governmental affairs group filed in January, on behalf
of Transredes, has come to a very successful conclusion and the new rates
will go into effect towards the end of this month.  The rates are not much
lower than what we filed for, and represent a very significant increase over
the previous rates.  The tariff methodology and revised regulations, put into
effect by the Supreme Decree, were followed to the letter by the regulator
despite political pressure to arbitrarily keep rates down.  The deliverables
here were to (1) obtain a tariff methodology via Supreme Decree that would
make the company finance-able / rescue it from dire financial straits and (2)
file a rate case and prosecute it to obtain hard rates in accordance with the
tariff methodology.  This second deliverable has now been completed.
Transredes has had a bond issue pending since last year due to the
uncertainty about rates; it is my understanding that the financial market
loved the ruling and that Transredes sold $40 million worth of bonds in about
5 minutes!  This ruling should also significantly increase Transredes's
market value, relative to Enron's efforts to sell its interest in the company.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Doug Farmer
05/11/2001 06:09 PM

To: Peter E Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Hansvander.klink@shell.com.br, Hans.h.vanderklink@si.shell.com
cc: Jan van den Berg/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, John
Naphan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Cyro Camacho/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Pedro
Elio/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Fernando Gonzalez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES

Subject: Tariffs Approved

Gentlemen,

I am delighted to report that SIRESE approved substantial increases in TR's
tariffs consistent with the Law and Regulation.  The details are :-

     Existing Tariff SIRESE Approved % Increase TR/CLHB Proposed TR/CLHB %
Increase

Gas Export (including surcharges)  $0.18  $0.2205  22.5%  $0.26 (excluding
RG)  44.4%
Liquids Domestic    $1.05  $2.46  134.3%  $3.25    209.5%
Liquids Export     $1.55  $2.31  49%  $3.35    116.1%

CLHB's tariffs were also approved as follows $1.19  $2.20  84.9%  $3.528
196.5%

As you can see we did substantially better than CLHB (comparable with our
liquids domestic) !!

We will get a detailed report on the assumptions used by SIRESE to reach
their conclusions on Monday, but our inteligence suggests the following :-

1. Export gas volumes increased to 100% TR capacity, and 100% GSA + Cuiaba 2
assumed for SDA and TEMIN purposes
2. RG Compresion project deleted
3. Interest rate reduced to 10 or 10.5 % i.e. the rate in our bond issue
4. Liquids expansion in the South reduced
5. Some continuity of service CAPEX reduced
6. Unknown OPEX reduction and maybe a change to the OPEX allocation between
concesions
7. OCC in service date slipped from 2003 to 2004.
8. Debt/Equity assumption changed from 60/40 to 70/30

Our strategy to respond to each of these points is as follows :-

1. Volumes.  Covered by 8% rule, we can blete but can expect little back
here.  Clearly we will appeal if volumes exceed installed capacity in the
short term i.e. 2002/2003.
2. RG Compression - not worth fighting for since we don't even have the
support of BG
3. Interest Rate - We'll get this back when we do a tariff  revision and
actual rates are used.  When we get the detail we will appeal if Jan feels we
have concrete grounds i.e. commision costs etc. are omited.
4. Liquids Expansion in the South.  Here we intend to do a detailed analysis
of exactly what has been deleted and as a result what liquids/gas production
will be shut in.  If possible all assumptions to be agreed with the affected
producers (PB, BG, Vintage and Chaco).  We will then write to those
producers(copy SIRESE , VMEH etc.) stating that on their recommendation the
project scope was reduced by SIRESE.  We will give them an estimate of the
lost liquids/gas production (in both volume and cash terms) resultant from
this decision.  We will tell them that since they proposed these reductions
we have no intention of appealing them but invite them to appeal.
5. Continuity of Service Capex.  We need to see the detail here.  We will
take the moral high ground and be absolutely clear that we are not prepared
to compromise our safety and environmental standards.  We need to see exactly
what has been removed, but my thought is that if that means we are unable to
provide some services (e.g. LPG transportation) or the continued operation of
some liquids laterals, we should write to those producers affected suggesting
that if they wish these services to be continued they need to appeal the
decision.  Again since this is Capex we will get it back in the end on tariff
revisions as long as the expenditure is approved on an annual basis in the
SIRESE budget process.
6. OPEX - need to see the detail on Monday.
7. OCC - will not appeal - we need to do a detailed study to develop an OCC
strategy.
8. Debt/Equity ratio.  Strictly speaking what has been done is in accordance
with the Law/Regulation - the regulation says the maximum allowed equity is
40%.  However, we have very strong grounds to appeal since : a) we are
currently miles away from 60/40 let alone 70/30, b) we can only borrow for
CAPEX (as per bond issue and the policy of all/most banks/lending
institutions) with the case presented in the rate case if we borrow to cover
100% of CAPEX we can easily demonstrate that we are still miles away from
60/40.  We intend to fight this one very hard using all the
external/independant help we can get.

As you are all aware our big exposure with the rate case was that the much
needed substantial increase in liquids tariffs would not be approved and we
would be subjected to some form of arbitary cut.  This has not happened
SIRESE has now approved and hence owns these substantial increases.  Having
got the big hike our job is now to claw back as much as we can from the above
strategy in the full knowledge that the results of these efforts will be much
smaller and hence managable increases.

Attached is an analysis of the individual impacts on the tariff of the above
points and the corporate model using the new tariff with our volume
assumptions (i.e. the worst case).

Regards,
Doug


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

"Andy Katz" <AKatz@eei.org> on 03/01/2000 05:16:54 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, wfhenze@jonesday.com, rosteen@powersrc.com
cc:
Subject: Redlined Remainder of Master Agreement

I've added today's comments to remainder of contract, including Patty's
latest comments on Sch P and have renamed the file .  I plan to ship this to
Fritz in the morning so his people can do the formatting and return it for
our shipment to Houston tomorrow night.  You prompt comments would be
appreciated.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org

 - Std contract VERSION 2-1.doc


Thank you for helping on this.


Its coming ok -

I have a few things I will email you in a minute, and I have Lynette looking
as well.  I am getting it from all sides down here!

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	03/23/2001 11:27 AM

		 To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: how we doing on the supply-demand data?


Thanks.

Vince

Osman Sezgen@EES
02/17/2000 08:42 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "William Eaton" <enernet@hicom.net>@ECT, Michael Lassle/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: NJ Alliance

Michael Lassle is in charge of our lighting best-practices. He is the person
Mr. Eaton should contact.  Michael is in Houston and his number is
(713) 853-5023.

Osman

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
02/17/2000 07:55 AM
To: "William Eaton" <enernet@hicom.net>
cc: Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: NJ Alliance

Bill,

I forwarded your message to my associate, Osman Sezgen, who supports our
Energy Services group. He will E-mail you the name of a contact at
Enron.

Vince Kaminski

"William Eaton" <enernet@hicom.net> on 02/16/2000 08:25:02 PM
To: shelm@globalcloud.net
cc: steing@conedsolutions.com, robert.blake@conectiv.com,
marianne.abdul@conectiv.com, bekmank@conedenergy.com, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, robinsonm@conedenergy.com, nwilson@delmarva.com,
hudsonw@detroitedison.com, cndavis@duke-energy.com,
hbburnham@duke-energy.com, jhickman@duke-energy.com,
paul.skurdahl@engageenergy.com, James Mackey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, mrollhei@enron.com, hnmorris@metromediaenergy.com,
npalmer@execpc.com, chibbard@noresco.com, mhuang@usgen.com,
bshay@powerdirect.com, cmidura@pseg.com, ghallam@energy.twc.com
Subject: NJ Alliance

AESP members and utility affiliates,
We are looking for a good fit with one of the utilities intent on doing
business in the NJ, CT, PA, NY territory. Our qualifications and company
profile may be previewed at our web site, www.lightsourceonline.com. Email
contact information in response to this message.
Thanks,
Bill Eaton

 - att1.htm


Did you find the box in your office?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 08:29 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: MDEA

Please print two copies.

On the stuff you had copied for me, please have the copy sent to John Keffer
at King & Spalding.  I'll keep the originals.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:28
AM ---------------------------
From: Genia FitzGerald@ECT on 05/11/2001 10:54 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA

Kay,

Here is the Cover Sheet and Attachments for the above C/P.  I wasn't sure
about the due diligence on the "agency relationship" so was unsure as to
whether to put those riders in.  I have attached those riders so you can
advise me.  The Agreement is housed in your directory minus the General Terms
and Conditions.  When you are ready to send the Agreement then I can attach
the GTC.

Thanks,
Genia


I have not heard

	Rosalee Fleming
	11/20/2000 01:19 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Ken Lay Draft Letters

Re:  the attached.  Do we know yet whether it will be on the agenda?

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 11/02/2000 05:10:35 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Ken Lay Draft Letters

Steve, Ken did sign the Advisory Council letter.  He does want to brief the
Enron Board at the December meeting, if it can be worked into the agenda.  I
am copying Rebecca on this also.

Rosie

p.s.  Do you want us to mail out the Advisory Council memo letter?

From: Steven J Kean on 11/01/2000 04:12 PM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: Ken Lay Draft Letters

Please ask Ken to sign the following.  But, in the Advisory Council letter
delete the reference to the December Board meeting and check with Ken on
whether he still plans to brief the Enron Board at the December meeting (I
believe he talked to Kelly Kimberly about this).
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 04:10 PM -----

	Susan Worthen@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/31/2000 10:37 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Ken Lay Draft Letters

Steve,

Per our meeting yesterday, attached are the draft letters from Ken Lay to the
Board and Advisory Council.  l will deliver a box of Annual Reports today so
that they can be delivered to Rebecca Carter once the letters are signed and
returned to you.

Please call me if there are any questions.

Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp
713/646-6579  713/345-6164 fax
3AC 1525


Boyd,

I am not sure you have seen this agreement.  If you haven't, please give it a
look for "fatal flaws", or information you think we need to be informed.

Thank you,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 05:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           07/13/2000 11:24 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: The Peoples Gas Light Company

Kay - Sounds like Jeff is okay with the affiliate Master Purchase Sale
Agreement from an Enron transactional point of view.  As this document will
be filed with the ICC, I want to make sure that Boyd is agreement.  Assuming
Boyd gives the all clear, we need to decide if we intend to file this right
away or wait for the Hub Agency Agreement to be completed and make a joint
filing.  However, I am cautiously optimistic that we are not too far apart on
the Hub Agreement.  We had a commercial meeting yesterday and despite the
obstacles presented by my supposed MEH partner, Roy, I think we made some
headway.

Talk to you later,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
07/13/2000 11:07 AM
Sent by: Jenny Helton@ECT
To: Roy Rodriguez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg
Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: The Peoples Gas Light Company

Attached is a memo regarding the above.


Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Valdez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
04:06 PM ---------------------------

Ted Murphy
02/11/2000 04:06 PM
Sent by: Veronica Valdez
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Review of Business Unit Internal Controls

Attached is a document that I am not sure is entirely necessary; however,
depending on the response will indicate the need for implementation.


Tom:
My assistant spoke to Judy Smith about myself and my partner grabbing an
extra seat on the jet to Tampa.

My partner and I were invited to the game by a couple of gentlemen from New
York that I do business with.  Unfortunately, since I run the nat gas
derivatives desk and February expiration is next Monday, the only way we
could go is if the jet were coming back Sunday night.  No commercial flights
would get us back in time.

Judy indicated it was fine if we caught a ride on the way back, so my
contacts in NY booked the trip, including buying game tickets.  I am now
hearing that you may be leaving early Sunday night.  I was just wondering if
your plans had firmed up.  Obviously, it would be tremendously helpful to me
if the plane were leaving after the game.

Please advise,
John


Once upon a time there lived a king.
The king had a beautiful daughter,
the princess.

But there was a problem.
Everything the princess touched would melt.
No matter what;
metal,
wood,
plastic
anything she touched would melt.

Because of this, men were afraid of her.
Nobody would dare marry her.

The king despaired.
What could he do to help his daughter?

He consulted his wizards and magicians.
One wizard told the king,

"If your daughter touches one thing
that does not melt in her hands,
she will be cured."

The king was overjoyed.

The next day,
he held a competition.
Any man that could bring his daughter an
object that would not melt would marry her
and inherit the king's wealth.

Three young princes took up the challenge.

The first prince brought a very hard alloy of titanium.
But alas,
once the princess touched it,
it melted.
The prince went away sadly.

The second prince brought a huge diamond,
thinking that diamond is the hardest substance
in the world and would not melt.
But alas,
once the princess touched it,
it melted.
He too was sent away disappointed.

The third prince approached.
He told the princess,
"Put your hand in my pocket and feel what
is in there."
The princess did as she was told,
though she turned red.
She felt something hard.
She held it in her hand.
And it did not melt!!!

The king was overjoyed.
Everybody in the kingdom was overjoyed.
And the third prince married the princess
and they both lived happily ever after.

Question:

What was the object in the prince's pants?

(Scroll down for the answer)

?

?

?

?

?

They were M&M's of course.
They melt in your mouth, not in your hand.

?

What were you thinking?

?
 <<ATT00010.gif>>  <<ATT00013.gif>>  <<ATT00016.gif>>  <<ATT00019.gif>>

 - ATT00010.gif
 - ATT00013.gif
 - ATT00016.gif
 - ATT00019.gif


As we get closer to the date, we will again be making dinner reservations for
all interested.  I'll request RSVP's to dinner in early August.

Lysa

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Perrino, Dave
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Perrino, Dave
Cc: Walton, Steve; Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@Enron; Nicolay, Christi; Davidson,
Debra; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Alvarez, Ray; Novosel, Sarah; Hall,
Steve C.; Denne, Karen; Tracy, Lysa; Davidson, Debra; Landwehr, Susan M.;
Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE-SCHEDULE NOTICE - Western Government Affairs Meeting
Importance: High

Dear All,

As a result of the recent volume of activity in Washington DC, with mediation
proceedings, refund discussions and the need for key members of our team that
need to attend these meetings, it has been decided to re-schedule the meeting
of the Western Government Affairs group to Wednesday, September 12, in
Portland, 10AM-5PM.

For those of you who had planned on attending, I am sorry to cause you this
inconvenience.  Hopefully for those of you who wanted to attend, but
couldn't, this will offer you the opportunity to participate on September 12.

Due to the volatility of policy related issues in our region, I would expect
there may be some modifications to our current agenda below.  As these
changes occur I will communicate this information to you.

Any questions or concerns, please contact me.

Kind Regards,

Dave

	  From:  Dave Perrino                           07/20/2001 09:36 AM

To: Steve Walton/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Davidson/ENRON@enronXgate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve C
Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@Enron, Karen
Denne/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Lysa Tracy/ENRON@enronXgate, Debra Davidson/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Draft Agenda for - Western Government Affairs Meeting

Below is a draft agenda for our planned meeting on Wednesday August 1 in
Portland Oregon from 10-5.  Tim Belden will be joining us from11:30-1PM
(thanks Debra) and the agenda is taking Tim's time into account.  We will be
meeting in the Mt. Hood Room, a working lunch will be provided (thanks
Lysa).

If you would like to modify the agenda, please send your edits to me.

10:00   Meeting called to order - Brief Introductions - All
10:10   Overview of Western Government Affairs Priorities (Jim or designee?)
11:00   What are the short-term needs of our Western Commerical Staff? (Alan?
)
11:30   Brief Overview of July 12 Rulings and discussion of the potential
impacts on the West (Ray/Christi/Sarah? and Group)
12:30   RTO/ISO Status Update (in alphabetical order)
  CAISO   (Sue)
  DSTAR   (Dave)
  RTO West  (Steve)
2:00 RTO Strategy discussion "How we move forward and how we should leverage
the recent FERC July 12 rulings"     (Group/Jim?)
3:30 Meetings, RTO's and WSCC - Ranking and Coverage coordination (Group)
4:30 Northwest OASIS "Enhancements" - Solicitation of Trader Comments (Dave)
(Note, Alan, can you please ask Diana,   Sean and Bill Williams III to see if
they can schedule time to attend?)

While developing this agenda from everyone's input I was thinking that NERC
is beginning to assert more and more influence (good or bad) on the entire
industry.  I would like to know if our group feels it would be useful to
invite either Charles Yeung or Andy Rodriquez to our meeting to overview NERC
activities and or Electronic Scheduling?

Also, if Steve Hall has any legal or contract issues he'd like to discuss
during our meeting I'll be happy to add time for that.

Again, as noted above this is a draft and as you can see I have
un-democratically nominated (suggested) folks for leading various
discussions.  Any comments or confirmations of commitment to lead an agenda
item would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks for everyone's input.

Kind Regards,

Dave


I spoke with Scott Miller yesterday about several issues, so of course
California came up.  Scott expressed frustration with the California
situation and indicated that he thinks California will never be able to move
away from its current problems without a comprehensive solution, led by an
entity like the Administration.  Scott said he thinks all the parties need to
come to the table and reach some sort of agreement to net out the differences
between what suppliers are owed and what California thinks it is owed in
refunds.  Once that is accomplished, the parties would then agree to enter
into 1-3 year supply contracts at agreed-upon prices for the bulk of
California's power needs.

Scott has been floating this idea with his colleagues (unnamed) who countered
with "Would Ken Lay agree to something like that?"  I told him that I agree
there needs to be a comprehensive solution to California but I did not know
what Enron would agree to.  I asked him if he has heard anything about the
Vice President's task force and whether the report will propose something
like this.  Scott indicated that he and his group have had no contact with
the task force and he has no information as to what will be in the report.
This workout plan is just Scott's idea for now.

Scott said he thinks the current scenario is unworkable, that there is not a
lot of internal support for Hebert's approach, and that things will get
worse.  For example, Scott said that although generators are the only
suppliers subject to cost justification at present, if the problems continue,
marketers will be subject to the same cost justification in the future.

I thought you all would be interested in this conversation.  I told Scott
that since Joe has changed jobs, that he should feel free to call me with
questions or to talk about things like this, and he also told me to call him
whenever we need him.  Although Scott is not expecting a response from us on
his California idea, if we do have some sort of response, we may want to
convey it to him just to show our interest in working  with him and his group
and that we have a similar interest in resolving the problems in California.


shirley,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
01:19 PM ---------------------------

"Susan C. Hansen" <susan.hansen@stanford.edu> on 04/06/2001 06:14:10 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: clovell@stanford.edu, donna Lawrence <donna.lawrence@stanford.edu>,
hillh@stanford.edu, bambos@stanford.edu
Subject: Visiting Enron May 4th

Dear Vince,

this is great news!  Donna and I are delighted that you have time to see us
on May 4th.

I'll be out of the office next week.  By copy of this email to my
assistant, Carol Lovell, I will ask her to get in touch with Shirley for
scheduling as well as directions on where to meet you.  We'll be glad to
meet with Christie Patrick as well.

Looking forward to meeting you,

Susan

At 05:36 PM 4/6/01 -0500, you wrote:

>Susan,
>
>Thank you for your message. I shall be glad to meet with you on May the
>4th.
>I shall ask my assistant, Shirley Crenshaw (713) 853 5290, to call you to
>set up the meeting.
>
>Also, for your information, we have recently set up a special unit to
>coordinate Enron's
>relationships with the universities. The person running this unit is
>Christie Patrick.
>Please, feel free to contact her and give my name as a reference. I shall
>coordinate the meeting
>on May  the 4th with her.
>
>Vince
>
>
>Additional information re Christie:
>
>Phone :      (713) 853-6117
>
>Email:         christie_patrick@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>
>"Susan C. Hansen" <susan.hansen@stanford.edu> on 04/03/2001 04:33:54 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Visit from Stanford?
>
>
>Dear Dr. Kaminski,
>
>Let me briefly introduce myself, I am the Director of Corporate Relations
>for the School of Engineering at Stanford University.  In this role, I am
>always on the watch for ways to bring our faculty together with companies
>that have an appetite for engagement with top tier research institutions.
>
>I believe you know Hill Huntington, who is a senior researcher with
>Stanford's Energy Modeling Forum.  He suggested I get in touch with you for
>some ideas about contacts at Enron.  I'm in the process of planning a trip
>to Texas in early May along with my colleague Donna Lawrence, the
>university's Director of Corporate Relations.  We were hoping to be able to
>include a stop at Enron on our itinerary. Right now it appears that Friday,
>May 4th would work best for us but we're at the very beginning of our trip
>planning.
>
>The purpose of our visit would be to review the current relationship
>between Enron and Stanford, to give you an overview of current priorities
>in the School of Engineering, and ask for your help in identifying the best
>points of contact.
>
>I look forward to hearing from you about your availability,
>
>Sincerely,
>Susan Hansen
>
>
>
>
>Susan C. Hansen
>Director, Corporate Relations
>School of Engineering
>Stanford University
>Stanford, CA 94305-4027
>(650) 725-4219

Susan C. Hansen
Director, Corporate Relations
School of Engineering
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4027
(650) 725-4219


Steve and Frank, I would be very interested in your comments on the attached.


Michelle,

The below are questions I recieved with respect to the 3 month non-compete agreement for the Trading Track.    May I have your feedback.

Many thanks,

Karen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Linhart, Gary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	Confidentiality Questions for Legal

Karen,

Thanks for taking the time to discuss the confidentiality agreement pertaining to the ENA Trading Track.  As discussed, I am following up with a couple of questions regarding the contents of the agreement, specifically item 1.2.  From what I gather, the agreement very broadly covers the financial industry and I wanted to list a few scenarios to see if they are included or not included by the agreement.
- Non energy, non commodity based private equity firms
- Non energy-sector coverage within a mutual fund company
- Non derivatives based hedge fund
- Non energy based investment banking
- Equity research in with non-energy or commodity industry coverage

Please let me know for each of the above what is included and excluded.

Regards,

Gary Linhart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject:	Trading Track

Pls call and advise when it is convenient for you to drop by my desk today.

Kind regards,

Karen
x54667


Please put on calender

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Collins, Angie
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 8:04 AM
To:	Newlin, Ross; Meyer, Chris; Homco, Jim; Kellermeyer, Dave; Eghneim, Gus; Will, Lloyd; Robinson, Mitch; Gockerman, Matthew F.; Keenan, Jeffrey; Carnahan, Kathleen; George, Robert H.; Portz, David; Hoff, Jonathan; Miller(IBEW), Bill; Miller, Mike J.; Curry, Jim; Vos, Theresa; Jacoby, Ben; Murray, James; Miller, Don; Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	NEW ALBANY SCHEDULES

As most of you may know the New Albany Purchase and Sales Agreement has been executed.  A meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, June 27th to discuss going forward between the execution of the documents and closing.

It is imperative that each of you participate in the meeting.  If you are unable to attend in person, please call in using the following call in information:

Call in Number: 		800-713-8600

Passcode:  		65186

Duration: 		11:30 am - 1:00 pm

Room:			EB 8C1 (Enron Building Participants Only)

Lunch will be provided.

Thank you

Angie Collins
Enron North America Corp.
office: 713-853-3347
fax:  713-646-3059