Sara

Arbitration - we will agree to English courts as per the language amending
the osla. I will prepare an amendment side letter.

Limitation of Liability - this is our standard position. I propose the
language agreeed to by you for the PB agreement.

I trust this will now close the open issues.

I look forward to hearing from you

Kind regards

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: 17 September 2001 23:51
To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
Cc: kara.saxon@gs.com; Marie.Heard@enron.com; talya.gordon@gs.com;
Sheila.Glover@enron.com
Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
International

Daniel:

Thank you for your response.  Unfortunately, the outstanding issues
relating to the Terms of Business Letter impact our corporate policy.  If
you insist upon arbitration, it should be at either party's option and we
can agree to arbitrate in accordance with the International Chamber of
Commerce Rules.  Also, as you mentioned below, there may be non-prime
brokerage issues that relate to the terms of business and, therefore, are
not adequately addressed in the terms of business letter.  We do have other
business relationships with GSI and again request inclusion of limitation
of liability language in the terms of business letter.  I propose:

"Neither party shall have any liability arising from this Letter or from
any obligations which relate to this Letter for any indirect, special,
punitive, exemplary, incidental or consequential loss or damage."

Please reconsider the foregoing with explanation.  I will be out of the
office 9/18/01 in the a.m.

All remaining documents have been completed and we will have them executed
together with the terms of business letter.

Regards.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Harris+2C+20Daniel+22+20+3CDaniel+2EHarris+40gs+2Ecom+
3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:15 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara
   Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
             International

   Sara

   The terms of business are GSI's general terms and span your relationship
   with GSI generally. There may be non-prime brokerage issues that relate
   to
   the terms of business. Not everything in the TOBs intersects with the PB
   relationship, certainly if you do other business with GSI.

   Re the liability provision, I think your concerns are adequately
   addressed
   in the documentation as drafted.

   I would be grateful if you would come back to me as soon as possible so
   we
   can try to get this wrapped up today.

   Kind regards

   Daniel

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
   Sent: 10 September 2001 21:02
   To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
   Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
   International

   Daniel:

   Thanks for the message.  It seems to me that the terms of the PB
   conflict
   because J14 conflicts with A3, that is, (i)  J14 conflicts with Par.8
   requiring the conclusion that English courts will not apply to the Terms
   of
   Business agreement and (ii) A3 requires that English courts prevail.
   Are
   you agreeing with this analysis?

   Also, there is nothing in the Terms of Business agreement to conflict
   with
   the limitation of liability language of the PB applicable to the PB
   (except
   for silence on the matter).  You didn't address this point.  It is Enron
   Corp. policy to include such language and I would like to limit the
   Terms
   of Business in the same manner.

   Can you call me at 9 am Houston time on Tuesday, Sept. 11?  or suggest a
   different time?  I am not trying to belabor execution of the the
   remaining
   documents.

   Thanks.

   Sara Shackleton
   Enron Wholesale Services
   1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
   Houston, TX  77002
   Ph:  (713) 853-5620
   Fax: (713) 646-3490

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Harris+2C+20Daniel+22+20+3CDaniel+2EHarris+40gs+2Ecom+
   3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Monday, September 10, 2001 1:23 AM
      To:     Shackleton, Sara
      Cc:     Daniella.Bodman-Morris@gs.com; Heard, Marie
      Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
                International

      Sara
      Actually, I believe we resolved these when we spoke. Arbitration -
   more
      appropriate to general terms of business which principally
   contemplate
      the
      regulatory rules to which we are subject (SFA rules). In the event of
      inconsistency, the terms of the PB agreement govern (clause A3).

      I also amended the OSLA by side letter, which I sent over.

      Kind regards

      Daniel

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
      Sent: 07 September 2001 20:45
      To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
      Cc: Daniella.Bodman-Morris@gs.com; Heard, Marie
      Subject: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
   International

      Daniel:

      Thanks for finalizing the Prime Brokerage Agreement (the "Agreement")
      with my colleague Angela Davis.

      I have two points with respect to the Terms of Business Letter
   relating
      to the changes made to the Agreement which I believe we discussed but
      were not in a position to resolve at the time.  These are:

      (1)  Par. 8 Arbitration (which should conform to Clause J, Par. 14 of
      the Agreement).  I recall that we were discussing the possible use of
      arbitration in the Agreement (and existence of arbitration in the
   OSLA)
      so that we would not need to amend this particular paragraph of the
      Terms of Business Letter.  Since we ultimately agreed to English
   courts,
      I think we need to conform the Terms of Business Letter which will
      prevail if in conflict with the Agreement.

      (2)  Par. 8 Arbitration (which should be limited in the same manner
   as
      Clause J, Par. 11 as to limitation of liability).  I believe that you
      and Angela agreed to the revisions in the Agreement.  Why shouldn't
      these be mirrored in the Terms of Business Letter?

      I look forward to hearing from you and completing the rest of the
      account documentation.  Regards.

      Sara Shackleton
      Enron Wholesale Services
      1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
      Houston, TX  77002
      Ph:  (713) 853-5620
      Fax: (713) 646-3490

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and
      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the
      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply
      to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
      all
      copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Twanda, please save under Japanese labor law memo and print for me.  Thanks.
Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:56
PM ---------------------------

Nony Flores
03/24/2000 11:56 AM
To: Michael Gantt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Japanese Labor Law Memorandum

As per Alan's request, attached is the Baker & McKenzie memorandum dated
April 1999, which provides an overview of the principal labor rules and
standards required by Japanese law.

Thanks.
Nony Flores


Jeff Porter is the CES person responsible for looking at their transport.
Last week, he said he was working on their transport numbers.  Also,
yesterday I informed Jeff about some transport CGAS had listed on the EBB.


Mark,

Thanks so much for your kind hospitality.  Please thank Alicia again for me.
How did Lauren's play go last night?  I am getting more excited about a move
away from Houston, especially to Denver.  I hope you and your family have a
great trip and please do give us a call if you swing into Houston.  Talk to
you soon.

Kind regards,

-Larry-


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Hobson, W. Frank" <Frank.Hobson@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hobson+2C+20W+2E+20Frank+22+20+3CFrank+2EHobson+40ElPaso
+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Subject: Agency Form

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - EPNG Agency Agmt Auth 10 2000.doc


He's a goner and he is a Democrat.


went to the rodeo


mbfleming3: yo
Trogg 522: Buddy
mbfleming3: hows the week going for you
Trogg 522: i'm so so tired
Trogg 522: i want to go to sleep in the worst way.
mbfleming3: take a day odd
mbfleming3: off
Trogg 522: no no no, i do like to take fridays off though
mbfleming3: fridays would be better
mbfleming3: so my job search is over.
Trogg 522: yes sir, i mite do that too. REALLY
Trogg 522: so whats the scoop
Trogg 522: you are going to work for barer rite
mbfleming3: going to work for marathon oil
Trogg 522: barker
Trogg 522: cool, where are they
Trogg 522: when do you start
Trogg 522: what are you going to be doing
Trogg 522: can i tell everyone
mbfleming3: one at a time
Trogg 522: oh don't worry, i wrote them all one at a time
mbfleming3: i meant one question at a time
mbfleming3: they are off of san felipe in the galleria
mbfleming3: i start next monday/tuesday
Trogg 522: how many people are you echattig with at this moment?  STOP IT and answer my questions
mbfleming3: i was on the phone
Trogg 522: oh, ok
mbfleming3: i will be starting a new group doing business develp and marketing
Trogg 522: can i tell everyone?
Trogg 522: or do you want to do that.
mbfleming3: you can tell people
Trogg 522: so what is your tittttle
Trogg 522: New Group?   what business are you going to develope?
mbfleming3: phone call please hold
Trogg 522: grrrrrr
mbfleming3: still working on my title.  i will be marketing their existing assets and then any discoveries they have looking to find markets for it and also they are wanting to become more marketing oriented as opposed to just trading their existing supply
Trogg 522: WOW, you ARE the MAN.
mbfleming3: great group.  not very biga nd not very fat (very flat org chart)
Trogg 522: Well congradulations.  I'm sure I'll love having you as a new boss.
mbfleming3: what was your name again
Trogg 522: shoe shine and car wash boy
mbfleming3: well, that means that you will have to come out my way sometime so i can buy you some lunch
Trogg 522: Don't you worry.  I'll be there.
Trogg 522: Ingrid said she was very happy for you.
mbfleming3: thank you


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or the
Global Credit Hotline at x3-1803.


You're so right! I checked around and found that Arizona Public Service still
does the transmission deals for Pinnacle West. I'll change both deals right
away.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/13/2000 04:56 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 474708.01 and 475740.01

Hello, I think the above deals should be in as Arizona Public Service since
they are transmission deals.  Let me know what you find out.

Thanks alot,
Melissa


Start Date: 3/31/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033114.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/31/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/31/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DFISH
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Am I going to be able to get these out on the website today?

Eric

Robert B Cass
07/14/2000 11:31 AM
To: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Map and test - 2 Nat Gas Indices in TEST

Please map and test the following two (2) indices which are in TEST for Eric
Bruce (trader):

INDEX:   Gas Daily - WAHA - HeHub
SORT CODE IN TEST:  1006
ABBREV:  Waha-HeHub
PRODUCT TYPE: US Gas Fin Swap
DESCRIPTION:  The Index for a day shall be the difference between (i) the
Daily Midpoint price published on such calendar day under the heading "Daily
Price Survey" in the Permian Basin Area: Tex intras, Waha area section of Gas
Daily, or if a calendar day is not a Business Day then the price used shall
be the Daily Midpoint price published on the next succeeding Business Day,
and (ii) the Daily Midpoint price published on such calendar day under the
heading "Daily Price Survey" in the Louisiana--Onshore South - Henry Hub
section of Gas Daily, or if a calendar day is not a Business Day then the
price used shall be the Daily Midpoint price published on the next succeeding
Business Day.

INDEX:   Gas Daily - HSC - HeHub
SORT CODE IN TEST:  1001
ABBREV:    HSC-HeHub
PRODUCT TYPE: US Gas Fin Swap
DESCRIPTION:   The Index for a day shall be the difference between (i) the
Daily Midpoint price published on such calendar day under the heading "Daily
Price Survey" in the East -Houston - Katy, Houston Ship Channel section of
Gas Daily, or if a calendar day is not a Business Day then the price used
shall be the Daily Midpoint price published on the next succeeding Business
Day, and (ii) the Daily Midpoint price published on such calendar day under
the heading "Daily Price Survey" in the Louisiana--Onshore South - Henry Hub
section of Gas Daily, or if a calendar day is not a Business Day then the
price used shall be the Daily Midpoint price published on the next succeeding
Business Day.

Thanks!  - R


Ted, Anjam's and myself's meeting at MG in NY office on 7/20/00 was
productive.
I am working on a summary of this discussions (1a version layout)
and will send it to you after consulting with Anjam.

Regards,

Tanya.


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 04750

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Get ready.  Beginning in November, electronic pay stubs will be available to all employees who have their paychecks direct deposited into their bank account.  Electronic pay stubs are an easy, fast, and efficient way for you to get your payroll information.  They will also help Enron to realize a considerable savings in time and dollars spent over traditional printed pay stubs.

If you prefer to receive a hardcopy of your pay stub, click on the link below to complete a request form.  This form must be submitted to Payroll by October 15, 2001.  Unless you submit a form your pay stub information will default to electronic viewing.

Please click on the link below.

Name:             CHRIS GERMANY
Personnel number: P00503219
Phone:            7138534743

If you have questions about electronic pay stubs, please contact Janice Priddy (Payroll) 713-853-7839 or Marie Newhouse (ClickAtHome) at 713-345-4185 or send an email to  Enron.Payroll@enron.com (Enron Payroll in Outlook).

Stay tuned for more details in the coming weeks.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0810709/i.asp?r=13182&s=YXYCFXWE&l=9


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
01:36 PM ---------------------------

Joseph Hrgovcic
12/16/99 09:46 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Emission trading

Vince,

 I spoke with Susan Wood, who heads up our emissions marketing effort who
says we don't really have any materials we send out. She did recommend the
Emissions trading handbook which can be purchased for $50 from
http://www.etei.org/handbook_changed.htm.

 In general, the site http://www.etei.org/ is a great source of info, and the
the parent site, http://www.emissions.org should be checked out as well. If
you'd like me to purchase the handbook (it will take three weeks) let me know.

Joe

Vince J Kaminski
12/16/99 08:15 AM
To: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Emission trading

Joe,

Do we have any materials about it?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99
08:14 AM ---------------------------

Adam Brulinski
12/14/99 08:22 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Emission trading

Thank you in advance.

Let me just mention that the issue is quite urgent so I would appreciate if I
could get sth ASAP.

Adam

Vince J Kaminski
99-12-14 15:24
To: Adam Brulinski/WAR/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Emission trading

Adam,

Let me gather some information for you.

Vince

Adam Brulinski
12/14/99 08:08 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Emission trading

Szanowny Panie,

Chcielibysmy zaczac propagowac w Polsce idee handlu prawami do emisji
zanieczyszczen. Dlatego tez prosilbym o przeslanie, najlepiej droga emailowa
materialow dotyczacych tej koncepji - glownie chodzi mi o strone
"merytoryczna".

Z powazaniem,

Adam Brulinski


Here is the January file.  If you have any questions feel free to give me a
call.

Robin
x57478


The Indian Mesa sale closed last night in NY.  Our team did a great job.  All we have to do now is convince Enron's creditor's committee to let us use the net proceeds through a sale of the wind company!

Regarding the sale, we are wrapping up today the revised '01 numbers and the '02 and '03 projections and expect we will have the teaser done for a Monday distribution as planned.  Happy New Year.  Adam


Need a hard copy ... I don't have a password for cera

	Eric Benson
	01/20/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: High Speed Regulation in California - CERA Alert

Steve, Rick and Jim -

Below is an article from CERA that summarizes the current situation in
California.

Eric

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 01/20/2001 09:59 AM -----

	webmaster@cera.com
	01/19/2001 05:16 PM

		 To: messages@cera.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: High Speed Regulation in California - CERA Alert

Title: High Speed Regulation in California
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2208

A Feverish Pitch
The pace of regulatory and political events in California has taken on the
feverish pitch of the energy market crisis itself. Important decisions
regarding a wide range of market structure issues are being made quickly at
the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the state Legislature,
increasing the level of uncertainty most market participants already perceive
in the quickly evolving California market. Sudden changes are being made to
the
market structure, changes that used to require years in California,s complex
regulatory and legislative proceedings.

As rolling blackouts have rippled through urban centers of Northern California
on January 17 and 18, including in portions of downtown San Francisco,
Sacramento, and the Silicon Valley, state officials are scrambling to set up
the appropriate credit mechanisms to ensure the continued delivery of scarce
western energy supplies to California,s two largest utilities. Even at prices
near $800 per megawatt-hour (MWh), the California Department of Water
Resources
(CDWR), attempting to buy power on behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
and Southern California Edison (SCE), has been unable to secure enough to keep
the lights on. In the mean time, legal actions by some energy suppliers
threaten to tip the utilities into bankruptcy*and are being held at bay only
by
direct intervention of California,s governor.

Below is a summary of the various state actions being pursued concurrently:

*California governor. California Governor Gray Davis continues to attempt to
act on behalf of PG&E and SCE to secure long-term contracts for supply from
merchant generation owners and marketers in California. On the same front, the
governor has been negotiating with generators in an attempt to keep them from
seeking compensation through the courts for energy delivered to the utilities.
Court-ordered reimbursement could prompt bankruptcy.

*Legislature. Bills have been approved to authorize continued power purchases
on behalf of PG&E and SCE by the CDWR, to restructure the independent system
operator,s (ISO) governing board to consist of five members appointed by the
governor, to restrict the ability of the ISO to enter into a broader
interstate
regional transmission organization (RTO) without the explicit approval of
California,s Electricity Oversight Board, and to prohibit the divestiture of
the investor-owned utilities, remaining generating assets until 2006. The
vehicle for pursuing authorization of state bond financing for acquisition of
transmission assets and construction of new generation facilities is still
being developed.

*California Public Utilities Commission. On January 18 the CPUC adopted a
decision prohibiting the sale of SCE,s Mohave Generating Station to AES. This
voids a sale that was announced but not closed. The CPUC also delayed
decisions
regarding SCE,s application to end its rate freeze and the prudency criteria
for utilities entering into long-term supply contracts.

Some of these issues will continue to evolve as they progress along their
respective and sometimes intersecting paths, and some will need to pass
through
multiple review bodies. This rapid and erratic evolution has not helped to
decrease either the financial risk associated with supplying energy to
California,s two largest utilities, or the level of uncertainty in developing
new generation to supply California in the future.

The ISO anticipates that it will call stage 3 emergencies (reserves less than
1.5 percent) for January 19 and will most likely continue to curtail
interruptible customers through the weekend. Western energy supplies are being
strained by recent heavy usage of hydroelectric facilities where water
supplies
are already as much as 25 percent below average, owing to low precipitation
and
continued plant outages near 9,000 MW in California. The gravity of the
financial condition of California,s two largest utilities is exemplified by
the
need for other, more creditworthy intermediaries, including California
municipal utilities, state agencies, and some unregulated energy suppliers, to
act as temporary  guarantors for the acquisition of energy on behalf of PG&E
and SCE.

**end**

Follow above URL for full report.

*********************************************************
Come Shoot the Rapids with us at CERAWeek2001, "Shooting the Rapids:
Strategies and Risks for the Energy Future" in Houston, February 12-16, 2001!
For more information and to register, please visit
http://www20.cera.com/ceraweek/
*********************************************************

E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Western Energy,

**********************************************************************
To make changes to your cera.com account go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Very belated reply - I am cleaning up old e:mails today, and came across this
one that I had not answered.  Commercial does not sign confirmations at this
point.  Too many to make that practical these days.  When I started the
confirm desk in 1994, traders were signing confirms at that time. Once they
knew that they had someone who would take responsibility to make sure they
were right, they were very glad to pass that responsibility to me.  In the
early days of power, the traders once again were signing confirms.  Obviously
interested in the details of every deal that was done.  But as the business
grew, that too changed.  --Sally

	Barry Pearce @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/17/2000 07:53 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confirms

Sally/Brent

Quick question - your confirms - are they signed by both Commercial & Comm
Supp (as Attorney at Fact) - or by just one or the other?

I want to make sure EBS is consistent.

Currently - one of either Jim F or Paul R are signing all of them - rightly
so at the moement - not many deals and they want to see all.

Thoughts?

B.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 10/13/2000 05:02:10 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg101600.pdf


One of my GARP connections at El Paso has put forth a white paper for
discussion. He is hoping it will be adopted across the industry.  He will be
presenting it June 5th, at the next GARP meeting in Houston, to be hosted by
El Paso at El Paso.  He is collecting feedback before the upcoming meeting.
Please review, and comment to either myself of Lloyd at the address below.

Thanks,
Frank

His email address is:
Lloyd.Bloom@ElPaso.com


Ken:

Please take a look at this deal summary sheet.  As we discussed, our goal is
to come up with a structure that we can use for all of our "pool" sales
behind SoCal and PG&E.  CAn you get with the key folks and see if they like
the approach and to set the index premiums and discounts?

C


Guys, where is Rebox - it seems to have disappeared?  I assume you guys are
working on the accounting issues necessary to book the swaps on the Garden
State deal.

Regards
Delainey


Please read the attached memo regarding the significant shift in the
Commission's policy.   The policy sets out new interconnection criteria, but
announces that a pipeline may not deny an interconnection on economic grounds.


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041013.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


I'm sending down a copy of the letters.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Mahoney, Peggy
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Bolton, Stacey; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

Thanks, Peggy...MLC

Peggy Mahoney
08/06/2001 01:16 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I just talked to Stacey and I think we'll send a letter discussing the fact that the funds have
run out, etc.  I'll be back to you with a draft.
Thanks
Peggy

Marianne Castano
08/02/2001 12:05 PM
To:	Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

This is in regard to discontinuation of the Biz Mix product -- as you can see from the messages from Stacey below, we have stopped offering the product because the energy credit funds have been depleted.  I'm still going to ask Richard Ring (He's on vacation)  on Monday your question -- ie, is there any way we can continue with it, notwithstanding.   I fear he is going to say its possible to do so, but at an extreme loss of $$$....MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 01:01 PM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 12:00 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

You're welcome.  Hope I see you on Monday.  My understanding is that surprisingly some of the money that we've already submitted has been paid due (despite the fund being depleted) to overpayment/accounting issues with other entities.  This also has to do w/ the time lapse between filing for reimbursement for 3 months prior (i.e. I don't think Richard anticipated getting paid for some of January's purchases because technically the fund ran out in December).  There is definitely not enough money to continue buying going forward in the C&I fund.  It might be replenished next January provided direct access goes through.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Thanks, Stacey.  I hope all's well.  I'm going to get with him on Monday (I'll be in Houston) -- I seem to recall his mentioning that one particular fund is not 100% depleted, and that technically, we could continue to offer the product.  Do you remember his noting this?  MLC

From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 11:30 AM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Richard is on vacation until Monday.  To continue the Bizmix product, we would need the customer credit monies.  The customer credit monies for the Bizmix were depleted in January.  Perhaps Richard can work a deal for tags, but I still think this would be a premium and affect their positions in CA.  I'm sure Richard will give you more detail, but wanted to make sure you were aware of the situation w/ the incentive funds.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Peggy informed me on Monday that she did not want to send any notice letters to customers advising of the discontinuation of bixmiz, and asked if we could somehow, someway, continue to offer the product going forward.  I have a message into Richard re:  Peggy's message to me...MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/01/2001 05:21 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Michael Terraso/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

My suggestions are below.  Thanks Heather for the helpful update.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:30 PM
To:	Bolton, Stacey; Ring, Richard; Castano, Marianne
Subject:	CA BIZMIX Issues

Hello all!

I met with Diann Huddleson today and she clarified some issues for me regarding the DASRing of customers in California.  Unfortunately it wasn't what we wanted to hear.

On the easy side of things, all residential customers (PGE, SCE, SDG&E) were turned back to the utilities starting May 30th (DASRs were submitted and they are cycling off now depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.)  These customers received a letter letting them know about it.

On the commercial side of things (Diann had no distinctions between small commercial & large commercial & industrial customers), SDG&E customers have been ours all along and have never been DASRed and reDASRed.  In PGE & SCE, IBM behind PGE was also never put through the DASR process and has continuously received our product.  All other PGE & SCE customers were originally submitted for DASRing back to the utilities on - January 31!!!!!  That provides enough issues of its own, but I'll get to that.  PGE did a virtual switch so as of Jan 31 all these customers became PGE's again, but with SCE, when a customer was switched depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.  All de-DASRed customers were then re-DASRed back to us starting June 21, and Diann indicated that not only all of our old customers were re-DASRed, but new contracts were being executed and these new customers were also being DASRed to us.  No communication about all of this has been sent to the customers, but as we discussed, some personal basis notice may have been given to our larger customers through the reps.

So - I'm not worried about the residential side - we'll have to send them an annual historical label next April (with perhaps a letter explaining why they're still receiving info from us).  As far as the commercial/industrial .......

1.  No notice was provided to probably the majority of the customers. [Bolton, Stacey]  We (or PR) should prepare a customer letter as discussed with Peggy, notifying them that they are no longer receiving Bizmix ASAP.
2.  They've been receiving system mix since Feb 1 and we've been proceeding as if it were actually BIZMIX - i.e. the 2nd quarter labels they just received indicated BIZMIX, as appropriate to the customer. [Bolton, Stacey]   We should look into purchasing green tags to make these customers whole if we will be more than 5% off of our projection v. what we actually delivered.  The regs allow for discrepancies between projections and actual, and you don't have to show an extra column w/ the difference if you are w/in 5% delta band between projection and actual..  We can change the projection for third quarter and include this information in the customer letter.
3.  What are the new customers (those as being DASRed to us the first time as of June 21) being told they are receiving?  Are they being marketed BIZMIX? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should ensure this is not the case with origination.  Someone in Jeremy B.'s shop will most likely know.
4.  As far as dates are concerned for reporting purposes, will we just use those given as the date of submission (i.e. Jan 31, May 30, June 21) as it is impossible to pinpoint when each individual customer transferred? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should discuss this a bit.  I'm not sure that this will really matter at the end of the day.  The CEC has instructed us all along to send labels to the customers, which we have.  We'll report the purchases (brown and green) as normal at the end of the year.

Let me know your input.

Heather

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Let's catch up when you're ready.

1.  Received NEW draft from Pacific Gas & Electric.  Need to do ISDA
comparison.
2.  Susan is out JUNE 1 and "Columbus Dispatch" needs to be finalized.  We
sent blackline Friday afternoon.  Details will happen Tuesday morning.
3.  Let's talk.


Daren, I just wanted to let you know that I submitted the churn for your
Lucent phone last week.  They have to create a duplicate extension so that it
can be plugged in at your desk.  I apologize for it taking so long ... it's
the first available slot that they had.

Laura

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001
08:46 AM ---------------------------

Move-Team
02/16/2001 11:13 AM
Sent by: John Salinardo
To: Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Slone/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: HPL/ENA

Your request has been added to the 2/21 churn.  Thank you.

Laura Vuittonet@ENRON
02/15/2001 04:55 PM
To: Move-Team/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT, Ben Hill/HOU/ECT, David A Cummings/HOU/ECT@Enron
Subject: HPL/ENA


See if there is anythiing of use in here for your high tech group messages.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 05:21 PM -----

	Rob Bradley
	09/25/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Digital Power Demand: JP Morgan Report

The JP Morgan report below gives further credence to the Mills/Huber thesis
of digital-age power growth.  The in-the-trenches story is different from
some of the academic studies by the conservation mavens.

- Rob

 - jp morgan.pdf


Some comments from Tim on the outline

Because the prices are based on L3Day NYMEX prices, when two out of three
prices have already been posted, it is impossible for parties to hedge their
risk for November.  [For your information but not for the filing - We have a
big position for November so we need to get this pushed off until December or
we could lose alot of money].
By basing the caps on heat rates from 1999, the ISO assumed that this was the
proper test period.  This is not a good test year given that generators lost
alot of money in 1999.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/27/2000 11:09 AM CDT
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, dexickson@mwe.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Pleading to Stop ISO

Here is the outline of some points to make in the filing today.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MGRIGSB>
To: Allen, Phillip K. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pallen>, Gay, Randall L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rgay>, Heu, Mog </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mheu>, Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kholst>, Huang, Jason </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jhuang>, Kuykendall, Tori </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tkuyken>, Lenhart, Matthew </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mlenhar>, Lisk, Daniel </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dlisk>, Reitmeyer, Jay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jreitme>, Sanchez, Monique </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msanch2>, Scott, Susan M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sscott5>, Smith, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msmith18>, South, Steven P. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ssouth>, Sullivan, Patti </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Psulliv>, Tholt, Jane M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jtholt>, Tycholiz, Barry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Btychol>, Wolfe, Jason </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jwolfe>
Date: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:41:38 GMT
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Polsky, Phil
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:57 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Summary for Grigsby.xls

MIke,

Attached is the updated summary regarding expansions in the west.  There is only one change - PGT 2003 expansion.  The expansion has now dropped from 230,000 MM/d to 160,000 MM/d due to PPL dropping out.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Phil


Richard, did this get properly taken care of?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: K #27291 - Invoices not capturing incremental fees for alternate points

[Hanagriff, Richard]  Will these new rates be entered so the reps can generate the revised invoices?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Elizabeth
Sent:	Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:58 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick; Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	K #27291 - Invoices not capturing incremental fees for alternate points

FYI - In working to load rates for the FERC California reporting requirements, it appears that for the last four months Duke Energy T & M contract #27291 has not been billed the incremental fee of $0.06/dth for alternate deliveries to the Cal Border (over and above the base discount negotiated for the contracted primary points).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
x3-6928


Start Date: 3/9/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Please find attached confirmations for Tenaska and Richardson.  There still may be a confirmation coming for Astra.

Thanks,

TK


-----Original Message-----
From: Murphy, Tim [mailto:Tim.Murphy@ElPaso.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:36 AM
To: 'Bump, Dan'; 'Whitt, Mark'
Subject: FW: Santa

BEYOND FUNNY

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Julia,

I am sending you a copy of the nondisclosure agreement I received from a
professor at UT
Austin. Three UT academics developed a model that may be useful in our pricing
applications. They envisage the possibility of either selling this model to
Enron or of joint research
effort in this area.

Can you, please, take a look at the attached legal document.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu> on 05/17/2000 08:56:42 AM
To: Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>,
"'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "'vkaminski@aol.com'" <vkaminski@aol.com>, "'Shirley Crenshaw'"
<Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
Subject: pricing default and our May 22 conference call

 <<nondisclosure agreement.doc>>
Dear Vince:

I spoke with Ms Crenshaw yesterday afternoon about a conference call about
developing internet course material.   If you have already discussed this
with your colleagues, it might be helpful if you could very briefly outline
the questions and issues they might raise in the conference call so that I
can be a bit better prepared.

Ms Crenshaw also mentioned that you never received my earlier email
regarding the credit spread model I developed with Stathis and Sergey.  My
earlier email follows, and the nondisclosure agreement is attached.

I look forward to talking with you next week.

regards,

Sheridan
Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Sheridan Titman
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 12:48 PM
> To: 'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'
> Cc: Stathis Tompaidis
> Subject: pricing default
>
>
> Dear Vince:
>
> I really enjoyed meeting with you yesterday and learned a lot from our
> discussions.
>
> The UT Office of Technology Licensing and Intellectual Property has given
> us the attached form which they would like you to sign before we send you
> a copy of our paper on pricing default.  Please let me know if this is
> agreeable to you.
>
> I hope we have the opportunity to work with you in the future, either on
> the debt pricing models or on the other issues we discussed.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> regards,
>
> Sheridan
>
>  << File: nondisclosure agreement.doc >>
> Sheridan Titman
> Department of Finance
> College of Business Administration
> University of Texas
> Austin, Texas 78712-1179
>
> 512-232-2787 (phone)
> 512-471-5073 (fax)
>
> titman@mail.utexas.edu
>

 - nondisclosure agreement.doc


Meeting Attendees:Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynette Malone/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Wetterstroem/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Alix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan S
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leei-Hong Chen/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Wisemiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa Lehn/HOU/EES@EES

Items discussed during the meeting & respective follow-up tasks.

1)  DNS name for the project was selected,
 http://Entelligence.enron.com/

2)  Type of Users
 Identified the types of users and assigned names to each type.   Users named
are approvers for User Acceptance Testing (UAT).
Originator  Jennifer Frazer
Trader/Financial Linda Clemmons
Trader/Physical Jeff Shankman (will delegate to desk director)
Sr Trading Manager Jeff Shankman
Sr Operations Manager Sally Beck
Administrator  Mary Solmonson

Originators will be the primary users (80-90% usage)

Followup Item:
Mary Solmonson will finalize the User names for UAT signoff.

3)  Use Cases and Actors (user types)
It was decided that capturing the requirements as Use cases will not be done
with the GIA business users.   Users stated that all types of users will have
access to all reports.  The functionality for each report will be same for
all user types.    Selection critieria and report content for each user type
will be controlled by a security  function.   Use case may still  be used by
the Technology team, when required, to help engineer a better technical
architecture.

4)  User Signoff of requirements document for Phase I deliverables:
Signoff for non-administrative functions:  Jennifer Fraser
Signoff for administrative functions:  Mary Solmonson

(addtl comments not discussed during yesterday's meeting)
User change requests  to requirements after signoff will be evaluated for
impact to schedule and cost.  Need signoff for Phase I deliverables before
Phase I project schedule is finalized.

5)  New user requirements reviewed:
Find Like Prospects (required for Phase I)
Peak Daily Volumes (required for Phase VII)

Followup Item:
Lynette Malone:  Changes to requirements discussed in yesterday's meeting
need to be applied to the Requirements document

6)   Administrative Requirements
Changes to administrative requirements are still outstanding.   Users are
meeting Friday, Feb 18 to discuss their requirements.    Based on the outcome
of that meeting, administrative deliverables for Phase I will have to be
reviewed again and cost and schedule will have to be re-evaluated.
Administrative requirements include GIA region administration,  Data
cleansing,  Administration of products/internal companies/deal nature to
identify deal activity captured in the Entelligence database.

Followup Item:
Mary Solmonson:  Define changes to administrative requirements.

7)  User Preferences
Requirements for User preferences are not yet defined. User preferences will
NOT be a Phase I deliverable.   Mary Solmonson said User preferences will
probably be deferred until Phase VII.


Gentlemen:

I have been advised by J. Nassos that Peoples (through WestLB) will be
exercising the ABB option today. I have asked that they send me a copy of the
notice of exercise of option, and I left Mike Sandridge a voice mail telling
him to expect it this afternoon.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kay


Associates & Analysts

As many of you are aware, "Bring Your Child to Work Day" is scheduled for Friday, June 29th from 8:30 - 11:30 am.

We encourage you to volunteer for one of the many activities that have been planned for the day.  Activities vary in length from one half hour to one hour.  This will be a good opportunity to meet other Analysts & Associates while having fun with the kids.

Attached below please find a detailed schedule of activities.  If you are interested in volunteering, please contact Jennifer Milligan (x3-5272) by Wednesday, June 27, at noon.

Traci Warner
Julie Davidson
Alex Hernandez

-------------------------------

Antioch Park Bazaar
Time: 9:00am -11:30 am ongoing in Antioch Park
Children will have a choice of a variety of activities. Are your children interested in the environment?  They will have an opportunity to plant a Texas native plant in a take-home pot while listening to a representative from Houston's Natural Legacy.  All children love to see animals.  Golden Retriever Rescue and the Bright & Beautiful Therapy Dog Association will bring their loveable dogs to amuse the children.  Houston Police Department will also bring their K-9 investigative dogs along with SWAT, DARE, patrol cars and police motorcycles.

Enron Federal Credit Union Bingo
Time:  Sessions every 30 minutes beginning at 9:00am in EB5C2
Come by the Credit Union Booth in EB5C2 and play the M*O*N*E*Y Game (Bingo Style). Kids will have fun playing the M*O*N*E*Y Game and learning about the Credit Union. They will also have a chance to win a fun prize and receive a cool giveaway!

Stranger Danger
Time: Sessions every 30 minutes beginning at 9:00am in EB4C2
Each day it seems we hear about another child crime.  Do your children know enough to protect themselves and avoid the danger?  This course will increase their awareness of the dangers in their surrounding areas.  The facilitator will deliver safety techniques they can use immediately.  The children will also be finger printed by HPD for your records.

Body Shop
Time: 30 minutes sessions beginning at 9:00am in The Body Shop
For this company coordinated event, the Body Shop will allow children in the facility.  Certified instructors will be in the gym to teach Enron children about the benefits of good fitness and nutrition.  Interval Aerobic classes will be available for children 6-12 years old; Kickboxing classes will begin every 30 minutes for children 12 years and up.  Parents can enjoy a free 5 minute massage while their children are in class.  A 10 minute tour of the facilities will be available after each aerobic session.

IT Events
Time: 30 minute sessions beginning at 9:00am in EB568, EB572, EB564
Three different classes have been developed for any child 9 years and older.  They can attend one or all the courses.  First, they may attend a Power Point class where each child will build their own business card.  Another option provides your child with an opportunity to write a thank you note to Jeff Skilling using Microsoft word.  The third option is to attend a course providing each child with an opportunity to learn how to send an email to their parent using Microsoft Outlook.

Build Your Resume
Time: Two one hour sessions beginning at 9am and 10:30am in EB20C2
What skills do you need to find a job?  The children (Ages 9 and up) will learn to write their accomplishments in a resume format.  They will also practice "selling" their best qualities and achievements. A special 30 minute session is designed for children 6-8 years old beginning at 10:00am.

Manners for Super Kids
Time: One hour sessions at 9:00am and 10:00am in The Energizer
Can you shake hands with unquestionable authority?  Has your body language ever been misunderstood? Children will have a chance to brush up on their social skills with a Manners for Super Kids class which includes an exciting Match Game.

SPCA Course
Time: One hour sessions at 9:00am and 10:30am in EB560
Animals are intelligent with personalities and feelings.  The 6-8 year old course will look at how animals and people communicate.  It will help the children build a more effective relationship with their pet.  In the 9 and up class, the children will experience a variety of activities focusing on pet care.  The facilitator will focus on the programs they offer in the neighborhoods and community.  Children will also learn about the importance of spading and neutering their pets.


Since I wrote on your copy of this e-mail here is what Bill sent to us yesterday.

Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: William_P_Saviers@dom.com [mailto:William_P_Saviers@dom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: pvrana@jw.com; apincus@lowenstein.com; Ruzinsky, Bruce;
metkin@lowenstein.com; Iris_G._King@DOM.COM; Jeffrey_A_Davis@DOM.COM
Subject: Enron Contracts

Ruth, here is a summary of contracts with Enron North American and Enron
Energy Services which we can use in our conference call.

(See attached file: Enron Contract list sent to Enron  6 4 2002.doc)

William P. Saviers, Jr.
445 W. Main St.
Clarksburg, WV 26301
Phone:  (304)627-3340
Cell:  (304)677-2485
William_Saviers@dom.com


The second phase of reconstruction on IH 45 between W. Dallas and Memorial
will begin Saturday, November 11, 2000, all northbound lanes will be closed
at 7 PM.  All northbound traffic will detour to US 59 North to IH-610 Loop.
Two northbound lanes will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000, at 5 AM.

  The Houston Avenue / Memorial Avenue exit and the entrance from Pease,
  St. Joseph's Parkway, and Walker  will be closed until further notice.
Anyone
  typically using these routes must find an alternate route.

The following routes are recommended by the Texas Department of Transportation

New Ramp Chartres at Runnels to IH 10 West

Louisiana North to IH 10 West on ramp

Allen Parkway to Studemont or Waugh to IH 10

West Gray to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

Bagby (W. Dallas) to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

San Jacinto to IH 10 East

North on main to IH 45

Travis to IH 45

The Downtown District is updating it's web site with detailed road closure
maps and suggested alternate routes.  This information is available at
http://www.downtownstreets.com. Please check this site regularly for updates
on street closures.


Approved,

Vince Kaminski

Information Risk Management
04/05/2000 03:50 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For Vince J Kaminski's approval

Below you will find a copy of a request that is awaiting your approval.
Please advise us as to your approval or rejection of this request by way of
email,  since your system does not allow you to open the icon that was
submitted by way of a doc link.

I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.

Leola Barnett
Information Risk Management
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
04/05/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

	 Security Resource Request System				Pending VP Approval
 Resource Request					How to find the status of this request...
	General Information		Initials:

Requestor:	Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT	Phone:	(713)853-6286
Requested For:		Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT
Request Type:	Update Access
RC #:	100038	WO #:
Company #:	0011	Priority:	High
Manager:	Mike A Roberts	VP:	Vince J Kaminski
Location:
					In the Request Processing section, see the status column for each requested
resource.
					Look at the overall status of the request in the title bar above. The status
will display Closed when your request is complete.
					Click the "Status" button below.
Comments:
					Request #: JSOV-4F8R44
					Submitted: 01/04/2000 01:58:37 PM

	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database
	Bloomberg	$1,800.00 monthly	Not Started

	Request Processing Path
Processed By	Status	When	Comments

	Manager	Approved	01/20 12:57 PM

	VP

	Security

	Implementation

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
2
3
4
5
6	Jason Sokolov
Jason Sokolov
Jason Sokolov
Jason Sokolov
Mike A Roberts 	01/04/2000 01:56:27 PM
01/04/2000 01:57:47 PM
01/04/2000 01:58:30 PM
01/04/2000 01:58:37 PM
01/20/2000 12:57:16 PM


Krishna,

I have already sent the letter.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J.
Subject:	Letter to the Embassy in Chennai

Vince:
	I sent you the wrong file earlier. Please use this one instead.
Thanks,
Krishna.
 << File: Krishna's Letter to the Embassy.DOC >>


John,

Jeff and I had many excellent meetings with your team and received a very
good run down of their businesses.  We went out to dinner with the key
players and I think they understand our new vision and they appeared to be
fired up.  As a follow-up to those meetings and our QBR,  Jeff and I would
like you to prepare a more definite business plan for the future. This will
represent your way forward for the remainder of 2000 and then 2001.  We would
like some additional pieces to your previously thoughts as well.  Listed
below are a few of the issues that we would like you to address and include
in your plan. Also listed below are key items that were included in your "way
forward" pieces of the QBR.

Once this is done, we will present it to Mark Frevert and then the other CEOs
in the wholesale group so that everyone knows where we are going and what our
plan is to change this part of our company.

Your vision of the future
Present historical total earnings from the group as a whole and by individual
groups (on 2 pages only).  Steps to grow your group to achieve our initial
discussions of big earnings leaps.  2001 - $200 mm and how to become a real
player in the business and get to a $500 mm business
Timeline to accomplish your goals and vision
Identify and address the leadership issues in your business.  Identify not
only how you think it should be organized and the resources that will be
required but also who else you need to get you there.
SWOT analysis as a group and by each business
Specific obstacles that need to be addressed to achieve your vision and goals
Identify potential assets needed to accomplish the desired growth.  Storage
facilities and control of information keeps coming up as a possible way to
gain a competitive advantage.  Could we purchase and/or build key storage
facilities and use info. like we do in gas.  Could we  buy space in the key
areas around the world?
EOL;  Although I realize many people in your group may have a different view,
EOL is a way to gain (or attempt to gain) a competitive advantage in an area
where we do not have it.  Identify your plan and action steps to lever EOL
and get people to really use it and put out many products and tight spreads.
I also want to begin really monitoring the percentage deal flow for the
traders  and they need to realize that we are doing so.  How do we do 1,000
trades a day on EOL?
Resources - how do we attract top talent since we don't offer a piece of the
book? What kind of packages would it take to attract that talent? Could we
attract younger talent and put with associates and analysts?  What
compensation issues do we need to address?
Technology - Could we uses satellite photos to monitor ships to see if
deliveries will be on time in low storage level areas?  Is there other
technology out there that will help you?
Information Technology - identify specific needs with prioritization.  Is
Project Thunderball the answer?
Singapore - How do we make them real players and more effective in the
market?  Do we have the right people and trading staff there?
Should we team up with FPL and let them trade resid on EOL?  Is this a way to
jump back into the resid market?

Please present and take Jeff and I through your plan by Sept. 13th.

Thanks and if you have any questions about the process and what we are
looking for, please don't hesitate to discuss with both of us.

Mike

Listed below are some of the  specific goals and ideas from your QBR.

Goals
? Become the #1 Global Products Trading Co both physically and financially by
exploiting strengths in key products
- Distillates
- Petchems/Plastics & NGL,s
- Gasoline & Components
- Financial Crude
? Expand and control E-Space
- EOL Trading & Marketing Teams
? Dominate ARB market
- Establish strategic storage in key markets
? Develop Research group to support trading
? Capitalize on key acquisitions to strengthen and support trading activity

The Way Forward (Petchems/Plastics)
? Establish step change in the business through EOL
? Trading Financial/Physical Naptha
? Strategic storage in Rotterdam, Singapore
? Strategic investments and/or offtake agreements
? Distribution market
? Explore financing arrangements, acquisitions
? Refine product portfolio
- Refinery chemical streams
? Penetrate spot market

The Way Forward (LPG,s)
? Begin trading S.E. Asian Market
? Restructure or exit Cremona
? Expand into Naptha Asia Pacific
? Access to USA import/export
? Offer all financial/physical products online

The Way Forward (Products)
? #1 Physical ARB player
? Develop/Expand Transatlantic gasoline business
? Naptha supply S. America
? 4 - 6 new traders
- Naptha, Resid.
? Expand EOL & Marketing

The Way Forward (Crude)
? One new trader - Houston
? Penetrate the physical market
- Structured offtake/supply agreements as trading bases
? Develop EOL Crude Team
- New products (grades) - LLS, HLS, WTS, Bowriver
? Posting Plus (P+)
? Options
- Increase counterparty base
- Access to additional e-commerce platforms

EOL/Marketing/Origination
? Build Marketing & EOL teams within the book
? Use origination to support commercial functions
- Trading, Marketing & EOL
? Pricing - Tightest tradeable spreads
? New Products
- Spreads, Option, Other Commodities
? New Counterparties
- Key to liquidity & growth
? Drive Platform to become the Hub
- Physical partner
- Synergistic Platforms
? Houston Street, Brent Broker, Red Meteor, eNymex
? ChemConnect, ChemMatch, Envera, Elemeca
- Our own bricks & mortar
- Shipping & operations

Man Power Requirements
? Petchems
- Two Aromatic traders
- Two associate/analyst
? LPG,s
- One analyst
- EOL support
? Group
- M & A Expert & Support ) 2
- Research Group - 3
? Total - min 30 people

Man Power Requirements
? Crude Oil
- One International Trader
- Two to three associate/analyst
? Products
- Two to four Resid traders
- One to two Distillate traders
- Two Naphtha traders
- One Gasoline trader
- Four to six associate/analyst


I am fine thank you. How are you and your family doing? and Happy New Year
as well! I will put it in the car on Sunday :o)

Love ya back!

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
                    01/09/02 01:26        Subject:     RE: E-Card from Hope
                    PM

Hi honey,

how are you? Yes, I'm dying to get my gown?  Anytime this weekend, how
about bringing it to church on Sunday.  Just put it in your car.

Love ya!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:10 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  E-Card from Hope

   Hope has sent you an e-card from Easiest Greetings!
   You can view your card at the following address:

http://www.greetings.easiest.com/index.cfm?key=111570&email=patrice%2El%2Emims%40enron%2Ecom&name=Patrice

   EasiestGreetings is a service provided by Easiest.com.  Visit
   Easiest.com at:
   http://www.easiest.com/

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I have a question about how this deal is entered.  You have it entered as
every day of the week including Sundays and Holidays for the hours 7 -22.  I
think that will duplicate the off peak hours you have entered for Sundays on
#533134.  It is already flowing Sundays, 24 hours on #533134.  Is this in
addition to those hours or is it a duplication?

Also, do you want these two confirmed on one letter or as two separate
deals.  If together, please put a note in the comment section of deal entry
sp we will know to confirm both on one letter.

Thanks!


I have written a short outline of the task at hand.  Jim and Jonathan, could
you please review/correct/elaborate?

Thanks,
Vasant


Jim I will incorporate your suggested changes into the new draft.  I will work on recomposing the paper.  There will not be a vote this coming Thursday.  Doug and I will attend the meeting.

Were there any other suggestions besides the Exec Sum and the Header?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	Maurer, Luiz
Cc:	Yeung, Charles; Nicolay, Christi L.; Shapiro, Richard; Walton, Steve; Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	MY THOUGHTS ON BALANCED SCHEDULES IN ERCOT

LUIZ --  Attached is a version that I changed.  Mainly formattting the intro.  I think that our current draft is too long without a short synopsis up front. We want a White Paper that reads like an advocacy piece.  Please add to whatever you are doing.  Also, move forward with contacting Larry Ruff for (1) his analysis of your and my combined draft and (2) a simple affadavit on this.  Govt Affairs will pay up to $10k for this work out of our current budget.  We need to have this finished by Tuesday EOB.

CHARLES -- We need to make sure that Monday and Tuesday someone calls everyone on the Committee considering changing these rules on Thursday.  Let's get the list and start lobbying actively.  Call me if you have any questions.  Please talk with Doug Gilbert-Smith about who and where.  Maybe Christi and Jean Ryall can help.

CHRISTI -- Pls make sure that Steve Walton and Sarah Novosel are ok with this statements.

Thanks.

Jim << File: Balanced Schedule 11.21.01.doc >>


There are clearly a large number of people who need to know what is happening
on the integration of the MG metals business and a large number of fluid
teams working on different aspects of the project; however, most issues
related to the integration process will only be of interest to a subset of
the people involved.

We currently have two main forums for information sharing available to
members of the integration team:

The weekly newsletter produced by Fiona Grant in PR, which from 30 June
onwards will be sent to EEL management and the heads of those departments
represented on the Integration Team.
A weekly meeting on Friday mornings from 8am to 9am in NW1006, which has been
put in place to provide team leaders with an opportunity to update the entire
integration team on their top two or three issues for the past and/or coming
week.

For now, I expect the weekly update and the weekly meetings to meet the
information needs of the integration team.  If you feel this is not adequate,
then let either myself or Fiona Grant know and we'll do a re-think on the
subject.

To this end, and in the interests of ensuring that we conclude our discussion
in the allotted time, the following are a few organisational points I would
like everyone to bear in mind when attending the Friday morning meeting:

Attendees should distinguish between presenters and audience at the weekly
meeting.
Presenters should attend if at all possible and, in the event they are unable
to attend, should nominate a replacement for the meeting (replacements should
be notified to Esther Gerratt in advance of the  Friday morning meeting if
possible).

For the time being, presenters and their designated areas are:

- Eric Gadd  Commercial and Acquisition progress
- Amita Gosalia  EOL
- Justin Boyd  Legal
- Toby Knight  Premises
- Barry Sangster  IT infrastructure
- Bob Campbell  IT applications
- Richard Sage  Middle and Back Offices and Project Management
- Lloyd Fleming  RAC
- Tim Davies  Credit
- Anne Edgley  Finance
- Anne Hicks  Cash Management
- Janine Juggins  Tax
- Andrea Kerch  US GAAP and Due diligence
- Nigel Sellens  HR
- Fiona Grant  PR
- Bruce Garner  Business Development

As  this is intended to be an "update"-only meeting, any unresolved
substantive issues are to be taken off-line and the resolution reported the
following week.
Lastly, I would request that presenters focus on communicating, in an
efficient manner, things which affect other functions within the integration
process.  Doing so will assit other presenters in relaying the information
presented at the meeting to other personnel in their respective areas.

I hope you find this useful.   We want to keep the information flowing as we
continue the integration process, but at the same time we need to make sure
we use our time wisely and efficiently.

Regards,
Eric


FYI.  Discouraging first response from Governor's office.  More
tomorrow.  Marybeth
 - tyson_to_davis.doc


Don,
Please advise of your interest in the following Candidate.

Courtnie Parker
Enron North America
(713) 853-5315
courtnie.parker@enron.com


I would add a sentence indicating that the contract and counterparty numbers will continue to fluctuate on a daily basis due to terminations.  Also, I would remove the org chart.

Regards,

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wax, Brandon
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:11 AM
To:	Murphy, Harlan; Tweed, Sheila
Cc:	Richter, Brad; Baughman Jr., Don; Racicot, Paul
Subject:	Letter to E&Y

Attached is the letter we intend to send to E&Y.  Please forward any comments ASAP to Don Miller.

	WAX

 << File: 1-28EandYMemo.doc >>


see attachment
Joel Bluestein
Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Phone 703-528-1900
Fax 703-528-5106


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012741&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000012741
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/8/01 4:34:26 PM
Requested For       : anita.dupont@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


i dont book these trades


************************************************
Weekly Web Specials
************************************************

________________________________________________________
1) WEB SPECIALS INTRODUCTION

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.  Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets
subject to change.

Our Web Specials are available via our home page at http://www.alaskaair.com
or
http://www.horizonair.com

________________________________________________________
2) WEB SPECIALS VALID DATES

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel:

Originating:
Wednesday, April 18, 2001
Thursday, April 19, 2001
Saturday, April 21, 2001

Returning:
Saturday, April 21, 2001
Monday, April 23, 2001
Tuesday, April 24, 2001

________________________________________________________
3) WEB SPECIALS FARES

All fares quoted in US dollars, without airport fees and segment tax.

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK             Barrow, AK                   $209.00
Anchorage, AK             Butte, MT                    $369.00
Anchorage, AK             Cordova, AK                  $89.00
Anchorage, AK             Eugene/Springfield, OR       $279.00
Anchorage, AK             Ontario, CA                  $279.00
Anchorage, AK             Orange/Santa Ana, CA         $289.00
Anchorage, AK             Phoenix, AZ                  $289.00
Anchorage, AK             Sacramento, CA               $269.00
Anchorage, AK             Seattle, WA                  $189.00
Barrow, AK                Anchorage, AK                $209.00
Boise, ID                 Spokane, WA                  $59.00
Burbank, CA               Portland, OR                 $149.00
Butte, MT                 Anchorage, AK                $369.00
Butte, MT                 Eugene/Springfield, OR       $149.00
Butte, MT                 Ketchikan, AK                $349.00
Butte, MT                 Ontario, CA                  $199.00
Butte, MT                 Orange/Santa Ana, CA         $209.00
Butte, MT                 Phoenix, AZ                  $219.00
Butte, MT                 Sacramento, CA               $149.00
Butte, MT                 Seattle, WA                  $99.00
Butte, MT                 Spokane, WA                  $139.00
Cordova, AK               Anchorage, AK                $89.00
Cordova, AK               Juneau, AK                   $79.00
Cordova, AK               Yakutat, AK                  $69.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Anchorage, AK                $279.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Butte, MT                    $149.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Ketchikan, AK                $249.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Ontario, CA                  $179.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Orange/Santa Ana, CA         $189.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Phoenix, AZ                  $199.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Sacramento, CA               $149.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Seattle, WA                  $59.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Spokane, WA                  $119.00
Juneau, AK                Cordova, AK                  $79.00
Ketchikan, AK            Butte, MT                    $349.00
Ketchikan, AK             Eugene/Springfield, OR       $249.00
Ketchikan, AK             Seattle, WA                  $209.00
Los Angeles, CA           Vancouver, BC                $139.00
Ontario, CA               Anchorage, AK                $279.00
Ontario, CA               Butte, MT                    $199.00
Ontario, CA               Eugene/Springfield, OR       $179.00
Ontario, CA               Seattle, WA                  $149.00
Ontario, CA               Spokane, WA                  $159.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Anchorage, AK                $289.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Butte, MT                    $209.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Eugene/Springfield, OR       $189.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Seattle, WA                  $179.00
Petersburg, AK            Spokane, WA                  $209.00
Phoenix, AZ               Anchorage, AK                $289.00
Phoenix, AZ               Butte, MT                    $219.00
Phoenix, AZ               Eugene/Springfield, OR       $199.00
Phoenix, AZ               Seattle, WA                  $179.00
Phoenix, AZ               Spokane, WA                  $179.00
Portland, OR              Burbank, CA                  $149.00
Portland, OR              San Francisco, CA            $79.00
Sacramento, CA            Anchorage, AK                $269.00
Sacramento, CA            Butte, MT                    $149.00
Sacramento, CA            Eugene/Springfield, OR       $149.00
Sacramento, CA            Seattle, WA                  $79.00
Sacramento, CA            Spokane, WA                  $99.00
San Francisco, CA         Portland, OR                 $79.00
San Francisco, CA         Vancouver, BC                $99.00
Seattle, WA               Anchorage, AK                $189.00
Seattle, WA               Butte, MT                    $99.00
Seattle, WA               Eugene/Springfield, OR       $59.00
Seattle, WA               Ketchikan, AK                $209.00
Seattle, WA               Ontario, CA                  $149.00
Seattle, WA               Orange/Santa Ana, CA         $179.00
Seattle, WA               Phoenix, AZ                  $179.00
Seattle, WA               Sacramento, CA               $79.00
Seattle, WA               Spokane, WA                  $59.00
Seattle, WA               Wrangell, AK                 $199.00
Spokane, WA               Boise, ID                    $59.00
Spokane, WA               Butte, MT                    $139.00
Spokane, WA               Eugene/Springfield, OR       $119.00
Spokane, WA               Ontario, CA                  $159.00
Spokane, WA               Petersburg, AK               $209.00
Spokane, WA               Phoenix, AZ                  $179.00
Spokane, WA               Sacramento, CA               $99.00
Spokane, WA               Seattle, WA                  $59.00
Vancouver, BC             Los Angeles, CA              $139.00
Vancouver, BC             San Francisco, CA            $99.00
Wrangell, AK              Seattle, WA                  $199.00
Yakutat, AK               Cordova, AK                  $69.00

Additional markets are available at
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp
Check the Alaska Web Specials page periodically as additional markets and
dates
may be added.

________________________________________________________
4) WEB SPECIALS RULES

* Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
* Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
* Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
* Valid on new bookings only.
* Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require
immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
* Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
* Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last
date of your planned travel.
* Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $18 or
segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as one
takeoff and one landing.
* Other restrictions apply.

________________________________________________________
5) HILTON HOTEL SPECIALS

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit the
Hilton web site at http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

========================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about our
great products and prices, you can  unsubscribe by visiting our Web site at
http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


Attached is the first draft of the prehearing statement in response to the
OII. Mona and I will be revising it. If you have any any comments / concerns,
please provide them by 12 pm PST, Thursday 8/10/00.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/09/2000
04:11 PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 08/09/2000 03:30:43 PM
To: <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>
cc: "Michelle Dangott" <MDangott@ArterHadden.com>
Subject: Prehearing Conference Statement

Attached is a first draft of the PHC statement, which is based on the outline
Mona sent me yesterday.  Please get me any comments by the close of business
Thursday, so that I may prepare a final version that evening.  Redline
comments would be greatly appreciated.

Dan

 - PHC Statement - First Draft.doc


Per Geoff Roberts


Mark,

According to the listing agent, the annual gross income for this unit is $22,800.  This is actual income from the past year. Expect this year to be somewhat less.  Also, a contract has been offered on this property, but not yet accepted.  I'm going over there to take a look today.

Randy

----- Original Message -----
From: Whitt, Mark <mailto:Mark.Whitt@ENRON.com>
To: Randy Lasater <mailto:randylas@vail.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: MLS Properties from RANDY A LASATER

Can you find out wha the average rental income is on one like this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Lasater [mailto:randylas@vail.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:27 PM
To: Paul Lucci
Cc: Mark Whitt
Subject: MLS Properties from RANDY A LASATER

Here's one I ran across. Not huge, but great location(walk to the gondola).  VERY rentable.

Randy

To view these listings, double click on the attached files.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


THIRD EXTRAORDINARY SESSION CALLED
Governor Davis has called a special session on Tuesday, October 9 to consider and act upon legislation affecting the operation, maintenance, finances, and financial viability of investor-owned utilities that provide electricity or natural gas to California residents and businesses, including their procurement portfolios and practices, and service by alternate energy providers in their service territory.
Extraordinary (Special) Session Rules and Procedures
Call of Special Session:
Only the Governor has the authority to convene a special session of the Legislature. In convening the session, the Governor must issue a proclamation outlining the reasons for the special session, and only issues specified in the proclamation may be acted upon.
Election of Special Session Officers, Committees and Bill Referrals:
The election of officers and the appointment of special session committees are separate from the Legislature's regular session. In some instances, special session committees are comprised of different committee members than those appointed to regular session committees.
Identification of Special Session Bills and Publications:
Separate record-keeping publications (File, History, Journal and Roll Call) are printed for each individual extraordinary session. Special session bills are identified by specific paper colors (i.e. blue or green). For example, documents in the 2001 Second Extraordinary Session are printed on green paper.
Introduction of Special Session Bills:
There is no limit to the number of bills that a member of the Legislature may introduce during the extraordinary session, and none of the bills introduced during the extraordinary session count toward the member's bill limit in the Regular Session.
Special Session Bill Procedures and Calendars:
There is no bill introduction deadline during special sessions, and the "30-day in print" rule and committee file notice requirements do not apply. Special session bills also are not subject to the regular legislative session calendar, committee and/or floor deadlines. The sine die deadline requiring session to adjourn on November 30 of the second year of a legislative session does apply to the Special Session.
Effective Date of Special Session Legislation:
Simple majority vote special session bills take effect on the 91st day after the special session is adjourned. Urgency measures and other two-thirds majority-vote bills take effect immediately upon the Governor's signature. The Governor has 12 days from the date it is received on his desk to sign or veto legislation. Similar to the Regular Session, a special session bill may become law without the Governor's signature.
End of Special Session:
Only the Legislature, by concurrent resolution, may end a special session. The concurrent resolution takes effect upon passage by both houses of the Legislature, and is not subject to a Governor's signature or veto.


The vast majority of these made me laugh out loud...enjoy!  SRS

?

 - coolpics.doc


Mike- I have their trader coming into the office tomorrow- they are a macro
fund (they manage Harvard's endowment fund) that trades commodities- mostly
crude and metals.  I want to get them into some gas and power trades.
Specifically, I want to get them into the short Rockies trade for the summer
that we have Tudor in.

Johnny recommended I have you speak to them- can you give me a few minutes
during the day to talk to them about the west in general.

I have him in all day- we are sitting with Mike Roberts to do the weather
update from 6 am-7:30 - would be great if we could get you between 7:30 and
8:30 am.  If not, let me know when is good- Ina will know where I am

Rgds,
Caroline
cell 917-324 1999


Return-Path: <ckoger@email.msn.com>
Received: from  rly-yb04.mx.aol.com (rly-yb04.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.4]) by
air-yb01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:48:58 2000
Received: from  cpimssmtpu04.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu04.email.msn.com
[207.46.181.80]) by rly-yb04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May
2001 14:48:20 -0400
Received: from ckoger ([63.25.119.250]) by cpimssmtpu04.email.msn.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3225);  Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:35 -0700
Message-ID: <001f01c0e54a$90ffd5c0$fa77193f@ckoger>
From: "ckoger" <ckoger@email.msn.com>
To: "Teresa Waldrop" <Tjwaldrop@aol.com>, <Rrlowery@aol.com>,        "Rock,
Rosie" <RRock@expressfashion.com>, "JOEL Pace" <PACE@dwlaw.com>,        "JANE
ALLISON" <janeallison@earthlink.net>,        "FRED LOWERY"
<FREDL1910@AOL.COM>, "FRANCES ASHE" <FASHEGM@AOL.COM>,        "Foster Henry"
<hsf1944@yahoo.com>,        "Clarice S. Orange" <cassie611@juno.com>,
"Christina Renee DeMoss Goodman" <chris_rose_rory@netzero.net>,        "BUBBY
LOWERY" <NASCAR9@AOL.COM>,        "Barbara Waldrop" <bswaldrop@aol.com>,
<Acohonomo@aol.com>
Subject:
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:43:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0E520.A3A53000"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
Disposition-Notification-To: "ckoger" <ckoger@email.msn.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2001 18:46:35.0861 (UTC)
FILETIME=[065F9850:01C0E54B]

Our perfect baby!
?
Rylyn Breck Koger!
?
Back to see Momma.
?
J
 - Mvc-027s.jpg
 - Mvc-026s.jpg


As everyone already knows we(Enron) does not have a shared drive for the
Daily.est.  So if everyone could update the sheet with their own volumes and
email me back i will consolidate it to (1).  Thanks

Please have your est volumes by 5:00pm Jan 25 (Tuesday)


is attached. ?I apologize. ?I sent it out yesterday, but apparently AOL
crashed and mail did not gothorugh yesterday. ?You ?can reach me at
801-582-2719 or 202-251-4784. ?Thanks.
 - enronrefund.wpd


I think we need to update tariff sheets explaining the contract has terminated.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doll, Jeanette
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	TW rate sheets

Teb,

In talking with Michelle Brown about billing the Conoco contract, she was wondering if we needed to changed the tariff rate sheets for the Current Firm Customers.  I believe I copied you on the Conoco contract e:mail on the TCR II surcharges.  I was thinking (before talking with Michelle) that we really did not have to change those tariff sheets (5B.02 and 5B.03); however, I am not so sure anymore.  The CFC rates on 5B.02 do not apply to Conoco anymore.  So do we need to take them off?  There is a note on 5B.02 that says the surcharges on 5B.03 (TCR II) are applicable to the CFCs listed on 5B.02.

So my question:  Do we just leave the tariff sheets alone, since Conoco's contracts under the Global and Mini- Settlements have terminated, or do we need to update this sheets?

I do not think this is urgent, but I wanted to ask.

Jeanette


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack@ENRON
04/19/2000 11:43 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: vlamadr@enron.com, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
sstonestreet@columbiaenergygroup.com, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Storage on TCO - PLEASE READ

To ensure everyone is on the same page.... Steve Stonestreet at TCO and I had
a conversation on how TCO works its storage ratchets. Steve, if I have
misstated something, please let us know.

There is a FSS schedule that tells the ratchets, minimum injections, maximum
withdrawals, etc. This FSS schedule has been updated in the attached
spreadsheet with Enron's SCQ and Enron's MDSQ, which enables Enron to know
its different volume requirements.

Based on the attached schedule, each month there are different Maximum
Monthly Injection Quantities (MMIQ)  based on Enron's SCQ. There is no
Minimum Injection Quantity required by TCO.

TCO Injection Session and % of SCQ;

April = 15%
May = 20%
June = 20%
July = 20%
Aug = 20%
Sept = 13%
Oct = 7 %

If you add these months up, the total Injection is 115%. Essentially,
shippers have an extra 15% that does not have to be used during the injection
period. Please note, Shippers can inject all year around on TCO (November is
5% and December through March is 10%... typically not done).

For example, Shippers do not have to inject the ratchet amount in April
(15%). If the Shipper falls behind on the STOI, and the Shipper needs to
catch up on STOI in the future months, and the Shipper wants to go over the
ratchet level for that month, then TCO will need to give its prior approval
(I sound like a lawyer). Typically, TCO is more willing to approve
overinjections in the early months of the injection session versus
overinjecting in September and October, when TCO is full.

Some other basic rules;

Shippers do not have to fill storage 100% by October.

Shippers cannot have more than  60% in storage by June 1st, unless
overinjection is approved by TCO.

Shippers can have daily net withdrawals in the summer, and it works the same
way it did in the Winter. Depending on the % SCQ, this will determine the
MDWQ. As of today, 8.3% is in the ground so Enron can net withdraw 54,324.
Once Enron is between 10% to 20%, then the MDWQ is 70,521... but remember
Enron's SST is only 54,324 until October 1st... so other transport will need
to be used to avoid overrun charges.

Why do we care about all of this....

Enron wants to slow down on the injection into storage. Because choice still
uses storage withdrawal in April and storage withdrawal is used for
Hopewell... there may be days that we are net withdrawing. As long as we stay
below 54,324... there will not be penalties. If we go over this amount, we
will need to get gas controls approval... the same drill we use for
overinjections above 36,304.

TCO Schedulers... we have been doing a great job monitoring this so far.
April is a very hard month to monitor storage. Remember, if we have problems
running Storage reports from our PC's or Laptops, TCO has the ability to run
the reports and TCO will run it on the weekends if necessary. From these
reports, we can determine if we need to get the overwithdrawal or
overinjection approval from TCO's Gas Control. TCO's gas control will need a
volume amount to place in their book... which is the bible for TCO enforcing
penalties. The penalties are pretty steep... max is $10 dkt.

Please save this note for future reference.


Errol,

I have saved a DPR, in the regions path, for the NG Gas Deferred for 10/01. Please save the file NGDKRS1001good, as your file for the NGDKRS1001. I had to change your beginning balances for 10/01 to tie to your ending balances for 09/01 and I changed your gross book balance so that it ties to the value in Schedule C. These changes, however, did not change your P&L for the month.

Thanks!

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


I just left you a message Callme 35587

	Kirk McDaniel@EES
	01/22/2001 08:35 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders@ECT
		 cc: Mary Clark@ENRON
		 Subject:

Richard

Good Morning. What's the status on the transcripts? When do you want to get
together in order to provide Beth with the outline? Pls advise

Cheers
Kirk


Vince,

I just wanted to follow-up with you regarding the action items that were
taken away from yesterday's meeting with you, Mike Roberts, Norma, and myself.

1)  Tony Hamilton
As you know Tony's official start date was March 12, 2001, and he has yet to
receive a paycheck.  London's pay cycles are different than ours however, and
they only get paid on the 20th of each month.  Tony did not receive a
paycheck on March 20th because all of his new hire information has to be put
into SAP (the payroll system) by the first of the month for the employee to
receive a check on the 20th.  Consequently, Tony will not receive his first
paycheck until April 20th.  If you would like for me to try and work with the
London office however and try to get him a paycheck quicker than that, please
let me know.

2)  Joe Carson
From what I am able to gather, Gary Hickerson did make Joe Carson an offer
that consisted of a one-year contract.  However, Gary is out of town until
Monday, and no one is sure of the specifics of the deal.  Would you like me
to contace Joe to find out the specifics, or would it be more acceptable for
me to wait until Gary returns so that I can get all of the facts.

I look forward to working with you.

Thanks,
Anne Labbe'


FYI.  A couple of comments on the GE contract.

Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 12/04/2000
10:37 PM ---------------------------

John Guidry
12/02/2000 03:36 PM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron, Roderick Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Glauco
Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Mucci/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

Brett,

Just a few comments.  Exhibit H-2 Training and Exhibit B-2 Specifications
need to be added.  Exhibit N-1 does not have the unit price.  The Contract
Terms do not have the contract price.

John

Brett R Wiggs
01/01/2001 09:49 AM
To: John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron, John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron, Roderick
Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Glauco Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Mucci/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

I failed to forward this to you guys yesterday.  Please work to come up with
consolidated comments as soon as possible.  Same comment on major problems as
opposed to small comments.

Thanks,
Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 01/01/2001
12:48 PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/29/2000 03:18 PM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

The first of these two documents contains the key terms of the GE contract
for the ESA deal.  It was prepared by GE.  Your comments would be appreciated.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000 12:14
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 11/29/2000 07:10:18 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

 <<ESA_Electrobolt_Summary of Contract Terms-112800.doc>>

 <<ESA_Electrobolt_Exhibits.DOC>>

Here's what I think we should have on the ESA exhibits.  Let's see if it
will hunt.

Thanks,
Lee


Eyeforenergy is pleased to announce that one of our sponsoring publications, Risk in Focus (www.riskinfocus.com) has just agreed to sponsor 5 tickets to the upcoming Energy Exchanges Online Europe conference taking place in Amsterdam, February 19-21st at the Hotel Okura.

This means we have 5 tickets to give away at noon (GMT) on Friday.

With speakers from Powergen, Bergen Energi, RWE Trading, Endesa, El Paso, the European Energy Exchange, the UK Power Exchange, and the Amsterdam Power Exchange to name a few, this event is your opportunity to get the lastest news on the energy trading industry.  With the recent changes in the industry, can you afford not to be networking with your peers at this crucial time?

For more information on the conference simply go to www.eyeforenergy.com/freedraw and fill in your contact details.  Recipients will be notified by 1pm GMT on Friday 25th January.

See you in Amsterdam!

The Eyeforenergy Team.


-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Thomas [SMTP:kthomas@betzcompanies.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM
To: 'dimoore@airmail.net'
Cc: 'bettynance@delnet.com'
Subject: Directions to  My Place

Denise/All Others:

Here are the directions to my house.

Take Beltway 8 South, get off at So. Post Oak, make right.  Go to first
light, this is Ridgecreek Dr. - I think it is W. Ridgecreek, may be E.
Ridgecreek, make a left (good markers are an auto parts store, Little Ceasars
Pizza and a Food Arama Food store shopping center.  Go to second stop sign
which is Ridgestone St., make a left.   Continue on this street to the second
stop sign, this is East Ridgecreek Dr., make a left.  Continue on this
street, you will go over a little bridge; at first stop sign this is still
East Ridgecreek, make a right.  From here all the streets are East Ridgecreek
Dr. which are divided by blocks, you want to go to the third street, make a
left.  My house is the second house on the right, 4859 East Ridgecreek Dr.
If you have problems call me on my cell phone 832-493-2699.  See you there! !
! !

Your Sister in Christ our Lord
Katherine T. Dailey


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 08:46 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	03/26/2001 05:10 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-111) NYMEX ACCESSc Web Site UPDATE

As of Monday, March 26, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESSc web site remains unavailable.
We expect to have the web site available on Sunday, April 1st for trade date
April 2nd. We will inform you if the web site becomes available earlier.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESSc Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESSc
price information at 1-800-438-8616.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-111)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.