----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Sheila Glover
	07/27/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Futures Documentation

Sara,
The clearing agreement is below.
We do not need to complete the Give-up agreement.  We  will execute and clear
through CSFB for this activity.
Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 03:21
PM ---------------------------

"Reis, Steven" <steven.reis@csfb.com> on 07/27/2000 02:58:04 PM
To: "'sheila.glover@enron.com'" <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Futures Documentation

Sheila,

At the request of Kate Goss of our Fixed Income Trading Group
please find clearing documentation and a Give-Up agreement for
executing with additional brokers.

 <<futures.pdf>>  <<3prtygu.doc>>
Please have the clearing documents executed by the appropriate parties and
returned to my attention along
with supporting documents establishing the ability of the entity to trade
futures, authorization of the individual(s)
who signed the documents to be able to do so, trading guidelines and any
applicable resolutions.

With regard to the Give-up Agreement, please have this document executed on
behalf of Enron and forwarded to the
executing broker with instructions to return the Give-Up agreement to me for
final signature and distribution..

Please call with any questions or concerns.

Regards,
Steven J. Reis
Vice President
CREDIT l FIRST
SUISSE  l BOSTON
Legal and Compliance
Tel:   212-325-6365
Fax: 212-325-8282
e-mail Steven.Reis@CSFB.com

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - futures.pdf
 - 3prtygu.doc


[IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Save 10% on everything and pay only $4.99 shipping thru 11/24!  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] These 4x8 cards  include your picture, personal message and mailing envelopes. Click here  to  create an account and save 25% on your Holiday Photo Cards!** searsphotos.com Xbox The Sweepstakes  [IMAGE] Order $50 or more at wishbook.com or sears.com and be automatically entered to win *** one of 100 Xbox game systems! [IMAGE]   You have received this wishbook.com email on behalf of sears.com. If you would no longer like to receive e-mailed special events information, sales notifications, or other messages from sears.com, please click here  and follow the "Unsubscribe" instructions. Or reply to this email with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.  Your e-mail address will be removed within 5 business days from our email marketing list. Thank you!   * Save 10% off any order placed on wishbook.com thru 11/24/01. Discount applies to merchandise only, not shipping and handling or taxes. $4.99 shipping offer applies to standard UPS ground shipping charges only; special handling and additional shipping charges do not qualify. Approximate retail value $17.99. Telephone orders are not included. May not be used with other discounts or offers.  ** Shipping fee of $2.25 per 100 cards is not included. Go to http://www.searsphotos.com and login to your account.  Select a roll to view or upload your images then click the Order Pictures tab. Select Photo Cards. Choose a design and add your image.  Click the Preview or Order tab then Add/View Cart. Enter Promotional Code:  SF6952 and click Apply before checking out. We recommend  that all Holiday Photo Card orders be placed by December 1st so the U.S. Postal Service can get your order to you in time for holiday giving. Your Photo Cards are shipped to you with envelopes and are ready for you to hand out or address and mail to family and friends. This offer good once per account until February 25, 2002. Sears Card and other major credit cards accepted on-line.  Cannot be combined with other offers. Void if copied, transferred or where prohibited by law. Any other use constitutes fraud. Cash value 1/20?.  *** NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. To enter, make a $50.00 or more on-line purchase from sears.com or Wishbook.com between 12:01:00 am EST on 11/18/01 and 11:59:00 pm EST on 12/21/01. Sweepstakes open to legal residents of the 50 United States or District of Columbia, who are at least eighteen (18) years of age at time of entry. 100 Microsoft Xbox game systems will be awarded. Approximate Retail Value (ARV) $300 each.

Message-Id: <20011119164957.5B00.473304-13888@specials.sears.com>
 [IMAGE]


[IMAGE] 		 Fare Sale
			[IMAGE]
	    Dear Susan,  It's the beginning of a new year so why not get things off to a great start by booking a trip to Europe and taking advantage of incredible fares?  This is the post-holiday sale that tops them all! British  Airways announces fantastic air fare specials , starting  at $218 round-trip, to 45 European destinations including  London, Paris and Rome.  Follow this link for more details:  http://www3.travelocity.com/promos/baus_offer/0,,TRAVELOCITY,00.html  Sample Round Trip Fares:  $269 - Boston to Paris $286 - New York to Paris $326 - Washington D.C. to Paris $338 - Atlanta to London $278 - Chicago to London $368 - Los Angeles to London $292 - Boston to Amsterdam $442 - Dallas/Ft. Worth to Amsterdam $452 - San Francisco to Amsterdam  For these or other great fares, click on the link below: http://www3.travelocity.com/promos/baus_offer/0,,TRAVELOCITY,00.html   You must book and pay for your tickets between January 3 and January 17, 2002 for travel between now and April 6, 2002. Higher fares may apply to holiday travel taken March 22 through April 6, 2002.  Happy Travels!  Chris Monroe www.travelocity.com 1-888-TRAVELOCITY (872-8356)  ------------- Apply for the Travelocity World MasterCard and earn points  towards free travel! Visit this link to apply: http://www.travelocitycard.com  ------------- Interested in saving even more on airfare? You'll receive $75 in cash rebates on airline tickets and many other travel benefits when you join the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program today.  http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PP  ------------- Fares shown are for one adult and are subject to additional  charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger Facility  Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of $3.00  per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and taxes/fees  associated with international itineraries.  Fuel surcharges, if  applicable, are included in the fares listed.  Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always be  displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase.  Please note  that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on  all flights, and may change without notice.  For detailed  descriptions of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules  link.   		 travelocity home  customer service  flights  cars  lodging  vacations  cruises

	        CUSTOMER SERVICE   UNSUBSCRIBE     HOW DO I UPDATE MY E-MAIL?    FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?    0  When you registered at Travelocity or Preview Travel, you agreed to receive e-mail. If you would like to change your subscription preferences or if you received this message in error, please click here .    [IMAGE]  You may update your e-mail address within Your Account Preferences. Simply go to the Travelocity reservations page, log in, and select the Your Account  area.   [IMAGE]  Travelocity's online Customer Service  can help you remember it. Just enter your User ID and your e-mail address, and if it matches our files, we will e-mail your password to you.   [IMAGE]      Sabre Connected  Travelocity and Travelocity.com are trademarks of Travelocity.com LP and Sabre is a trademark of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. 2000 Travelocity.com LP. All rights reserved. #240 CST#2050374-40


Should have sent you a copy of this...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 03:22 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           08/15/2000 02:02 PM

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Additions to Attendee List for Dallas ASE

As a result of the creation of the Global Markets business in the last few
days, I would add the following persons to the attendee list for the ASE in
Dallas:

 Brent Price  VP Operations and CAO, Global Markets
 Tom Myers  Director of Accounting, Global Markets

Brent is in London this week, and will be on vacation the week of August 21.
With the demands of a new role, Brent will be best able to address the
feasibility of one or both of them attending.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Larry- out of office (Surgery)

Date:		3/19/2001
Time:		7:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Lynn Blair

Detailed Description:


Daren,

Just call me Mike.
How about Thursday, the 17th at 1:00.  Let's plan on 1 hour. Can you locate
a conference room?

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Daren J Farmer [mailto:dfarmer@ect.enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 5:23 PM
To: Mam@teamlead.com
Subject:

Michael (or Mike..what do you like to be called?),

My schedule is open Thursday afternoon 1-5pm and Friday 1-4pm.  Let me know
the
what works best for you.  Earlier in the afternoon is usually best for me.

Daren


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000033005&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000033005
Request Create Date : 5/4/01 2:34:18 PM
Requested For       : daren.j.farmer@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US NatGas NatGas Book to Book (Trader Access - Website)
Resource Type       : Applications


Nick,

We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research projects
before your visit to Enron.

My assistant, Shirley  Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference call
with me, Stinson Gibner,
and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues. Friday
this week would work for
both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes.

Vince

P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525
(office).

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
cc:
Subject: Visit to Enron

Hello Vince,

It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch
we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the
technical level and otherwise.

I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for
a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was
clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule -
mine is rather terrible:

Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter
Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron
to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to
visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in
Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays.

Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably
is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within
a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be
important for the student support funds to be in place then, so
that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top
talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have
approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft
commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its
potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought
after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this
competition.

Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the
project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the
end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can
happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May.
I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
going. Please let me know what you think.

Best Regards,

Nick


Citizens has modified their NNT storage service, here are the new parameters.

-----Original Message-----
From: CoganJA@aol.com [mailto:CoganJA@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:11 AM
To: plucci@enron.com
Cc: cwlipke@czn.com; sbreen@czn.com
Subject: Citizens - CIG NNT Services

Paul,

Below are the NNT service levels that will become effective October 1, 2001.

October                   6,250
November                6,579
December                6,579
January                   6,579
February                  6,441
March                      5,151
April                        3,750
May                        2,519
June                          838
July                           972
August                       987
September               3,618

Additionally, I would like to confirm that Citizens' CIG TF-1 service effective October 1, 2001, will be 10,550 Dth/day.  Citizens will no longer have a sculpted service.

Should you have any questions, please let me know.

Best regards,

John

The Johnco Group, LLC
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056

Phone  (504) 392-7557
Cell      (504) 491-2784
Fax      (208) 730-4713


Zhiyong,

Thanks.

Vince

	From:  Zhiyong Wei                           01/10/2000 08:10 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: congratulations

Vince,

Congratulations on your promotion to Managing Director. You certainly deserve
it.

Zhiyong


Attached is a Merrill Lynch report concerning Sempra and rate uncertainty in
Southern California.


As of the writing of this e-mail we have not yet received the official FERC
Order.

We would like to reassure you as a valued Participant that we will keep you
informed on any forthcoming changes.  At the present time, we do not
anticipate
any change in our Market Operations based on discussions during today's call.

Upon receipt and review of the FERC Order, we will provide additional
information.


Hey, it worked great--I replicated several sets of messages without a
problem.  Then, on Sunday, I did something and now can't get the computer to
load up windows.  It stalls out on the "Property of ET&S" screen right after
I turn it on.  Please make it happy again and ship it back up.  (I don't know
if this would cause such a problem, but I may have shut off the computer off
on saturday before I got the message saying "it is now safe to shut off your
computer."  )  Thanks. DF


FYI

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Seyfried, Bryan
Sent:	Monday, May 21, 2001 3:52 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Mack, Iris; Dhar, Amitava; Danilov, Viacheslav; Leppard, Steve
Subject:	George Albanis

---------------------- Forwarded by Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT on 21/05/2001 09:55 ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
21/05/2001 09:31
To:	ECT Enron Credit
cc:

Subject:	George Albanis

Effective immediately, George Albanis, has left the company to pursue opportunities outside Enron.

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Hi there -

Thanks for the compliment on the picture.  It's a little unnerving putting a
digital image of yourself out there and hoping it is a true representation.

So tell me more about yourself.  You must work hard in your job - but what
else do you enjoy.  Are you skier or mountain enthusiast?  What brought you
to Colorado?

I love it hear and take advantage of as many activities as I can...

Do you have big holiday plans?

S

>From: <plucci01@talkmatch.com>
>To: <sgilcrease@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Match.com - You've Got Mail: Hello
>Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:56:56 -0600
>
>Hello,
>
>I ran across you picture and thought you were very attractive.  I sent
>along my profile, take a look.  If there is any interest write back, I'd
>sure like to hear from you!
>
>Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
>http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=65685
>
>The following is my profile text:
>
>Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time.
>I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy
>trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in
>prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching,
>but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or
>college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and
>doesn't take themselves too seriously.
>
>*********************************************************
>
>ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:
>
>Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
>that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.
>
>You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
>clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
>site.
>
>However:
>
>* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
>message as we are unable to remove these.
>
>* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of
>
>your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
>your email to remain anonymous.
>
>Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
>liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
>Match.com Service Agreement.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.


Mike,

Per Gerald's voicemail, the attached Amendment for your review and comment.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


See attached

From: Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/12/2001 08:33 PM

To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications

cc: Mark Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly
Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: EBS Article for eBiz

Jim and Ken --

Attached is an article for eBiz (our biweekly online newsletter), which we
are scheduled to launch at 7:30 a.m. Friday.  Kelly Kimberly has reviewed it,
but has asked that you view the article as well.  Since only EBS employees
received your memo about the restructuring -- and the rest of the employees
did not receive any communication -- it is extremely important to provide
information through this vehicle.

Please let me know of your approval or if you have any questions.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


Also re Nicor, GISB contractrs have been sent for execution.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Oil Traders: Effective Monday October 29, IntercontinentalExchange will list the prompt four months for the WTI bullet/Brent bullet.  These new strips will need to be manually entered into portfolios.

API Developers: The new product ID for the Crude Diff  WTI bullet/Brent bullet is 171.  The old product ID for this market was 18.

Please call the ICE 24 hour Help Desk with any questions  770 738 2101.


What about the access to the 50,000/d of new capacity at Needles that was being constructed? Wasn't that part of this proceeding? SoCal had argued that it would go to TW (we needed it for Red Rock).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Porter, J. Gregory; Rapp, Bill; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	SoCal Unbundling

At yesterdays CPUC meeting the Commission approved on a 3-2 vote the Comprehensive Settlement we supported to unbundle the SoCal system.  This includes open access to their backbone system and receipt point procedures we supported.  I'll distribute the final order as soon as its available with the effective dates and details.  gh


I tried that to no avail. Perhaps there was a glitch. Michelle
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Good morning -

Just wanted to let you know that I've been running the stage version of the
Forward Obligation report using production data, and I seem to be getting all
the same numbers as I do with the production version of the report. I will
continue to compare the two today when I run these reports, just to make
sure. But in the meantime, all looks well. Thanks for your help.

Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 11:32 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Forward Ob test run

    Thanks Kate,

    We were looking for somebody like you. You can run it with any settings,
   as you run it every day.  Make sure you see version 3.0.0.30.

    I think however it is better if you can run  the report against
production data
    because the test data are not good enough. I think David Poston created
    a shortcut on Cara's and Valarie's computers, you can talk to him to do it
    for you as well.

     The command from the command prompt should be:
      C:\Enpower\stage > FwdObl user_id user_password  pwrprodn_ded
    (ask the IT people if this doesn't mean anything to you, I can phone
       David as well you want me to)

     Thanks,
     Kroum
     713-853-9980

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:11 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Semperger, Cara
Subject: Forward Ob test run

I'd be more than happy to run a test of the new forward obligation report in
order for you to move it to production. I do use the application everyday
when determining the West desk positions in relation to each other, so it's a
report I'm familiar with and also one that may affect me if it's changed.
Please let me know if you'd like me to run the report and under what terms.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


>    Market Participants:
>
>    This notice announces the "re-opening" of the Summer
> 2000 Market Participating Load Trial Program.  Note that this program has
> also been referred to as the Summer 2000 A/S Load Program.   It involves
> load participation in the Non-Spin and Replacement Reserve and also the
> Supplemental Energy markets.  This re-opening notice does not apply to the
> Summer 2000 Demand Relief Program.
>
>    On February 29, 2000, the ISO issued a Market Notice
> for the "Summer 2000 Market Participating Load Trial Program" soliciting
> participation in the ISO's Ancillary Services and Supplemental Energy
> markets by additional Participating Loads.  The ISO proposed to
> accommodate such participation from June 15 to October 15, 2000 by Loads
> that could provide telemetry of their Demand data to the ISO's Energy
> Management System pursuant to a "relaxed" Technical Standard.  The ISO
> indicated that it would accept proposals for up to the following amounts
> of capacity for bidding in the specified markets:
>
>      Non-Spinning Reserve:   400 MW
>      Replacement Reserve:   400 MW
>      Supplemental Energy: 1,000 MW
>
>    In response to that solicitation, the ISO received
> several proposals and has been working to implement participation by the
> respondents.  In the course of the implementation process, the ISO has
> determined that the actual amounts of capacity that will potentially be
> available to participate will be below the maximum for any of the listed
> services.  Approximately half of the 400 MW in Non-Spin and Replacement
> has been committed (some subject to CPUC approval) leaving approximately
> 200 MW available in each category.  Approximately 750 MW is still
> available in the Supplemental Energy category.
>
>    Therefore, the ISO wishes to announce a re-opening
> of the period for submittal of proposals for the "Summer 2000 Market
> Participating Load Trial Program"  The ISO seeks to obtain the total
> amount of participation requested for the trial program within the time
> available.  At this time the ISO plans to leave this solicitation open
> until the maximum capacities are reached as noted above.  Also it should
> be noted that while the solicitation will be open until the requested
> capacities are reached,  the current timeframe of the Summer 2000 Trial
> Program and the applicability of the "relaxed" Technical Standards runs
> only through October 15, 2000.  At this time the ISO expects to continue
> this Load Program beyond October 15, 2000, however a final decision on
> continuation and the exact technical and commercial details applicable to
> any such continuation will be reached late this year based on a review of
> the Summer 2000 Program experience.
>
>
>    Additional respondents should follow the process and
> requirements set forth in the February 29, 2000 Market Notice in all
> respects other than the date for delivery of proposals.  This can be
> located on the ISO Home Page at  http://www.caiso.com/clientserv/load/ .
> or by navigating from Client Services to Stakeholder Processes to
> Participating Loads.  There are 4 documents listed under the Feb 29
> posting entitled " Formal Invitation for the Summer 2000 Load
> Participation in the ISO Ancillary  Service and Supplemental Energy
> Markets. "
>
>    If you have any questions, please direct them to
> Mike Dozier at 916-608-5708.
>
>
>    Don Fuller
    Director, Client Relations


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000005820&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000005820
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 10/26/00 2:27:45 PM
Requested For       : mark.breese@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Sorry guys, I missed a change. The TCO capacity going to BG&E (19,293/d) was
added to the Exhibit for the first quarter of 2000. The new file is attached.

---------------------- Forwarded by Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas on 01/13/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

Noel Bartlo
01/13/2000 04:22 PM

To: Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Phil
Glaessner/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, emcmich@ect.enron.com,
sdickso@ect.enron.com, jhodge@ect.enron.com, rbarbe@ect.enron.com,
cgerman@ect.enron.com, sneal@ect.enron.com, csulliv@ect.enron.com, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Retail Exhibit Revision 1-13-00

I have revised Exhibit 1 of the retail supply agreement pursuant to our
meeting
last week. Two changes were made:

 1)  Tennessee Zone 6 premium for 1/2000 was corrected to +.06.
 2) Volume requirements for Choice programs with storage were
reduced in most cases to account for storage gas being withdrawn. These are
the
final volumes.

 - GAS PURCHASE AGMT EXH 1 REV                     1-13-1.xls


fyi, for fuel cells and CRRA
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 05:33
PM ---------------------------

Stephen Plauche
10/16/2000 05:22 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Contact List

Kay,

 This may not be the most up-to-date version of the Fuel Cell Team Contact
List, but its a start.  It needs to be updated anyway.  Take care.

Stephen


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:49 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
01/12/2001 04:16 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Research Re-Org

Please let me know of any corrections.
--Stinson

Teams reporting to Krishna, Tanya,  Mike, and Maureen have no changes.

ENA/EGM/EIM support to be primarily organized by type of support rather than
by business line under Stinson and Vasant:

Stinson
(EBS)
Martin Lin(*),  Shalesh Ganjoo, Chonawee Supatgiat, Iris Mack
(Option Pricing)
Zimin Lu,  Alex Huang, Tom Halliburton,  Bob Lee,  Paulo Issler,  Ken
Parkhill,  Tom Barkley, Hector Campos

Vasant
(Power)
Martin Lin(*),    Lance Cunningham,    Sevil Yaman
(Risk and Market analysis)
Amitava Dhar,    Joe Hrgovcic,    Nelson Neale,   Kate Lucas

(*) Martin to have the option of maintaining ties to EBS or to gradually move
to mainly power fundamentals.


November 2001

Dear Friends & Family,

Happy Thanksgiving!  We hope that all of you are able to spend quality time
with your loved ones over the long holiday weekend.

Sophie and I would like to inform you that we have recently moved to New
Orleans, Louisiana (NOLA), as of Labor Day weekend.  As many of you know,
our recent transition is a result of Sophie's admission into the Tulane
School of Medicine.  She is currently pursuing her life-long dream of
becoming a doctor and we are both very excited for this opportunity.

NOLA is a familiar environment for both of us; it's where we met nearly
four years ago.  We are still maintaining a partial residence in Houston
and try to visit family & friends at least once a month.  I am still based
out of the Accenture Houston Office and currently work on a project in
Atlanta during the week.  Although we will be a little further away from
all of you, we very much look forward to your visits.  And we're especially
happy to announce that we'll be able to entertain you in our new loft
(unless, of course, Med School exams are going on).

Please feel free to update the following contact information and take note
of the upcoming events that will be taking place in New Orleans...

UPDATED CONTACT INFORMATION -

     Our new address:                   3700 Orleans Avenue #4404
                                   New Orleans, LA 70119

     Our new phone number:              504-934-1027

UPCOMING EVENTS IN NEW ORLEANS -

     Nokia Sugar Bowl (Only if UT makes it):  Tuesday, January 1, 2001

     Mardi Gras 2002:                   Friday, January 25 ? Tuesday,
     February 12, 2002

     NFL Super Bowl 2002:               Super Sunday, February 3, 2002

     Jazz Fest 2002:                    Friday, April 26 ? Sunday, May 5,
     2002

We hope that all of you and your families are doing well at work, in school
and at home.  Please keep in touch and let us know if you'll be in the
area!

Take Care (and Laissez le Bon Temps Rouler!),

Andrew & Sophie

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


Paul,

Just thought that I would let you know that the Red Rock deal which we were discussing yesterday does have an offsetting deal with OneOK, the supplier correct?  Anyways, the P&L impact on those two deals taken together is 0.  So, I am still looking into finding an offsetting Burlington Wic deal for Grigsby's WIC position.

Carole C, Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell


Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 924 MMBtu/d (85%), with San Juan lateral throughput at 849 MMBtu/d.  Total East deliveries averaged 479 MMBtu/d.

El Paso's average deliveries to California were 2146 MMBtu/d (73%):
- PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 716 MMBtu/d (63%)
- SoCalEhr, capacity 1250 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 985 MMBtu/d (79%)
- SoCalTop, capacity 540 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 445 MMBtu/d (82%)

Friday's posted Gas Daily prices:
	SoCal gas, large pkgs	  1.94 (-.635)
	PG&E, large pkgs	  1.855 (-.61)
	TW San Juan		  1.62 (-.70)
	TW Permian		  1.71 (-.70)

Enron Online bases:
		Dec-Mar		Apr-Oct
Perm-CA	.05 (-.03)	    	.21 (-.02)
SJ - CA	.20 (even)  	       	.41 (-.03)
SJ-Waha	.20 (+.04)	       	.26 (+.01)
Perm-Waha	.05 (+.01)                 	.06 (+.01)


Sure you are busy.  Sorry about the troubles.

Would it be possible for us to get a read-only account for Enron Online
so that we can monitor things?

--
Jim Nusbaum             rjn@predict.com
Chief Technology Officer
Prediction Company
phone: 505-984-3123     fax: 505-983-0571


Yep.

Jim has asked me to do some accounting stuff for him - but unless I'm reading it wrong - this does not change our plan.

Let's talk, I'd obviously like to get things sorted.

B.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Pearce, Barry
Subject:	Netco

ARe you still in?

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:51 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ben Gwaltney @ ENRON                           12/06/2000 09:23 AM

To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Updated - Approval Authorizations

Here is the new policy.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Gwaltney/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Dallman                           11/07/2000 11:27 AM

To: Ben Gwaltney/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Zabriskie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Martin/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Updated - Approval Authorizations

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Dallman/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/07/2000
11:24 AM ---------------------------

Richard Causey

11/07/2000 09:18 AM
Sent by: Sharron Westbrook
To: Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Echols/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Bob Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Dallman/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Knepshield/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jim
Gearhart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron, Shawn
Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Terrie Wheeler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John
Berggren/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Misty Barrett/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Duncan/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Updated - Approval Authorizations

As mentioned in my previous memo regarding Cash Control Standards, approval
authorizations are critical to our cash control environment.  Corporate
Accounts Payable is actively pursuing a "Workflow" system to route invoice
images for approval and processing.  This workflow solution will not be
implemented until early 2001.  In the interim, an approval process will be
implemented by AP and Treasury to ensure invoices have proper approvals and
correct general ledger coding.  Effective Monday, November 20 the following
approval authorizations will be required for all invoices, payment requests
and wire transfer requests that are $1,000,000 or greater:

(A)  Those NOT approved by an underlying contract or RAC require two
approvals:  a Managing Director approval of the payment, and an Accounting
Director approval of the general ledger coding.

(B)  Those that ARE approved by an underlying contract or RAC require an
Accounting Director approval of the payment  and general ledger coding.

In both examples above, supporting documentation must be attached.  If not
attached, then the payment will not be processed.

To assist us with implementing this approval process, I'm requesting each of
you to accumulate signatures of the Managing Directors and Accounting
Directors in your business unit using the attached form.  Please forward this
information to Larry Dallman (JFR568) by Friday, November 10th.

This new process becomes effective Monday, November 20th.  It important to
provide this information or payments greater than $1,000,000 will not be
processed.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzgerald, Genia
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Noske, Linda J.
Subject:	FW: THIS IS SWEET!!!!

 -----

 - Afgani-Stealth.JPG


Dear Sara,

During the past year, you've used NetstockDirect.com as a way to research or
enroll in a direct stock plan.  You know how easy it is to get started with
an automatic investing plan, and why long-term, steady investing is a good
strategy for building wealth.  You've probably also heard of our new
ShareBuilder program by now.  We think it is a better, cheaper and faster
method of investing than direct stock plans, and we want to give you $50 to
prove it.  Just go to www.sharebuilder.com/promo/50/en091300.htm, open an
account and make your initial investment.  After your first transaction, we
will deposit $50 into your ShareBuilder account.

SHAREBUILDER.COM - FASTER, CHEAPER AND BETTER THAN DRIPs & DSPs
ShareBuilder has great features that will let you quickly create a
personalized plan of investing.  It provides much greater flexibility and is
easier to use than a traditional direct stock program:

? NO ACCOUNT FEES - No entry or account setup fees to get started.
? NO MINIMUMS - start with any dollar amount and invest any amount.
? LOW COST - $2 recurring transaction charges, $1 for children's custodial
accounts.
? GREAT SELECTION - buy any major stock on the NYSE or NASDAQ.  (Choose from
over 3,000 companies or 68 index stocks - not just those with direct stock
plans!).
? SIMPLE STATEMENTS - a single page shows all your stocks at once.
? NO PAPERWORK - all transaction records are available online.

WE'D LIKE TO GIVE YOU A $50 BONUS TO PROVE OUR POINT
If you are currently investing using a direct stock plan, we will pay you $50
if you open an account and start investing with ShareBuilder.  To take
advantage of this limited-time offer, simply go to
www.sharebuilder.com/promo/50/en091300.htm, open an account and start a
ShareBuilder investing plan.  After your first transaction occurs, we'll
automatically deposit $50 in your account to help you get started.  But
please note that this offer expires October 31, 2000.

If you currently have shares in a direct stock plan, you can easily transfer
them to your ShareBuilder account.  It will be easier to track your
positions, make changes to your investing plan, keep track of your investment
records and, if you need, sell your shares instantly during market hours.  No
DRIP Or DSP even comes close on service, yet many charge more.

YOU CAN STILL COUNT ON NETSTOCK'S RELIABLE CUSTOMER CARE
I'm sure you will find ShareBuilder to be a much easier way to invest - open
an account today and let us prove it to you!  If you have any questions about
how to open your ShareBuilder account or how to set up your ShareBuilder
Plan, please contact our customer care professionals via email at
mailto:customercare@netstock.com or call us toll-free at 1-888-NET-STOK
between the hours of 6 AM and 6 PM Pacific Time, Monday through Friday.

Sincerely,

Jeff Seely
President and CEO
Netstock Corporation

P.S. You are receiving this email because you have a Netstock Direct Account.
You may unsubscribe, update or change your e-mail preferences, by visiting
the "Account" section of www.netstockdirect.com.

ShareBuilder(tm) is brought to you by Netstock Investment Corporation, a
registered broker-dealer, member of the NASD and SIPC and a subsidiary of
Netstock Direct Corporation. Copyright 1999-2000 Netstock Investment
Corporation. ShareBuilder is a trademark of Netstock Direct Corporation.
Patent Pending.

 This email was sent to:  sshackl@ect.enron.com


Mtg w/ Jeannie Mandelker EB 47112


I'm forwarding your message to the group here -we all wanna give you a big
hug!  I never really said anything to Carla because I liked working with her,
but that was always kind of a sticking point with the folks here in Houston
-she never would tell us when something was changed so we would always have
to run extra reports to make sure that we caught everything that might have
gone into pending.  It wasn't a huge deal, but it certainly helps if you
wanna drop an email or give us a call to let us know when anything changes
-that's how we do it here; everyone knows to tell documentation when they
revise any deals.  Also, don't forget to put notes in anytime you change
anything in Deal Entry to CYA.  So glad to have you and I can't wait to meet
you!
Not sure how good a tan you're gonna get around the New Year, though.  I
could let you know about some good tanning salons while you're in town (j/k).
Thanks again!
Kim

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/08/2000 10:24 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Deal #471740 Mieco

She didn't "warn" me that you were cheesy, but she did mention you were a
peach too! And anyway, I love cheesy e-mails.

But since I'm writing, I might as well mention that I have a deal that was
changed last night by one of our traders, and I think it needs to be
re-confirmed. It's deal number 476435 - Mark Fischer caught his own error and
changed the delivery point from Palo Verde to Mid-C.

And speaking of confirms and all that good stuff, that's one area I was never
really told about; so if you or anyone else in your group has any information
to share - anything that I could do to make your jobs easier or to make our
jobs synchronize better - PLEASE let me know. I'm very humble about how much
I have to learn, so the more people teach me, the better.

I believe I'll be coming down to Houston after the new year to meet people,
tour the place, and get a suntan! So if you don't want to call or e-mail with
every detail, you can compile them all and give me the run-down when I'm
there. Whatever works for you guys - just let me know.

Thanks a lot,
Kate


Harry:

Please handle as appropriate.

Regards, Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 02:10 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	09/07/2000 02:03 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Letter of Guarantee

Per Credit, Charlie Hoang on the Confirm Desk needs an Enron Corp. guaranty
of the attached physical pulp & paper deal.  I told Credit that your group
handles physical P&P.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 02:01 PM -----

	Charlie Hoang
	09/07/2000 01:58 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter of Guarantee

Tana, per my discussion with Paul Radous, I am
supposed to provide you with some information.
Counterparty has requested a Letter of Guarantee
from the parent company of ENA for pulp purchase.
Enclosed is the contract for this deal.  If you have
questions, please cal me.  Thank you.


I ended up staying up (must have been that last cup of coffee!) and revising
the agreement last night.  Attached is a clean copy.  I am having my
secretary run the blackline this am and she will email it to you (her name is
Deborah Morris, so look for an email from her.)  IMPORTANT!-- There are
several bracketed notes in italics that call to your attention items for your
input.  These are intended to be removed before this goes to VEPCO!

Kay--I'll call you later today or tomorrow, after we get their changes and
have a chance to review them.  Best regards.

 - VEPCOcln3.doc


i think i might be going to this gas conference on aug 7th.  that is a
monday.  if that is the case, i will try to fly into town either fri night or
saturday so i can have more time there.  i will let you know more monday.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:57 PM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
01/09/2001 02:26 PM
To:	Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 03:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Matt Motley                           01/05/2001 08:30 AM

To:	Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Motley/PDX/ECT on 01/05/2001 06:34 AM ---------------------------

Kristian J Lande

01/02/2001 06:15 PM

To:	Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:	Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999


Project GEM wants to hear from you!!!  Your workstation has recently been
upgraded to Windows 2000.  Our goal is to establish a common global
infrastructure that provides you with a stable and robust computing platform
for emerging technologies.  This innovation through standardization also
validates Enron,s status as an &Innovative Technology Leader8.  Additionally,
we are committed to providing the highest standard of customer service,
resolving IT issues promptly and professionally, while exceeding the customer,
s expectations.  Your feedback is key to our success in knowing how well we
have performed in meeting these goals as well as where we need to improve for
future upgrades.  Please help us with this process by taking a few minutes to
complete this survey about your recent experience with the Windows 2000
upgrade.

Please click   GEM Survey

Thanks in advance for your participation.
Sorry for the earlier problem.


Are you free for drinks either Monday or Wednesday?


Per Rod's comments, are we comfortable with the following three names as
off-line reference entities?

---------------------- Forwarded by John Metzler/LON/ECT on 03/05/2000 18:44
---------------------------

	From:  Rod Nelson                           02/05/2000 23:52

To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: approvals

      trading cp approval  reference credit approval

Ultramar Corp.     approved $5MM  approved $5MM

Petro-Canada    approved $5MM  approved $5MM

Louis Dreyfus Corp.    approved $5MM  approved $5MM

I assume that you will also seek approval from Legal.  I am still evaluating
Preem.

Rod


I spoke with Craig Glazer, the new director for PJM regarding their concept
for PJM West, which includes the following:

- Single market, rules, and tariffs for all companies
- No seams
- Reliability criteria of existing control areas in ECAR etc,
- PJM West could use PJM market
- A power exchange such as APX could be established as a competitive option
for day ahead transactions.
- Designed to be flexible
- Native Load exception is eliminated
- LMP
- Transcos could be a part of it

We talked at length about LMP and I suggested the hybrid as an option for a
variety of reasons.  He does not believe the hybrid method will work because
a study demonstrated that using past information to develop commercially
significant flowgates does not work since the paths will change, resulting in
insufficient coverage of costs which would have to be socialized.  He further
stated that there is insufficient data in the midwest to identify the
constraints and we would have to rely on info provided by companies like AEP.

Given our current efforts to develop a single RTO, I think we should meet
with the PJM folks and talk to them about our issues and see if we can come
to some agreements.  Craig thinks it is logical that FE might join PJM West.
I asked him if they were open to alternatives to LMP and he said he didn't
know.


The holiday party is this Saturday!  Please take a minute to review these
last-minute details, guaranteed to make our holiday party an exercise in
efficient merriness.....

1. Remember to RSVP.  If you have not done so, please see Kathy Axford or
Anna Mehrer TODAY.

2. Parking will be provided free of charge. Upon your arrival, tell the
bellhop you are an Enron guest.  Should you choose to park in the structure
across Pine Street from the hotel, take the ticket to the front desk for
validation.

3. Responsible drinking is encouraged.   Complimentary towncar services will
be provided by our friend Elaina at IMAX Trans.  Please contact her before
Friday to make arrangements. She can be reached at 503-358-7214, or via
e-mail at
imaxtrans@hotmail.com.  Please include your preferred pick-up time and
address in the e-mail, and Elaina will schedule accordingly.  And remember -
everyone's in the same holiday boat with an ever-increasing list of gifts to
get, so your gratuity to the driver is appreciated.

4. Embassy Suites is offering rooms to Enron employees at a special rate of
$125+tax on Saturday night.  A  breakfast buffet is included (as are those
little bottles of shampoo and shower caps!).  Please call 503-279-9000 for
reservations, and be sure to ask for the holiday rate.

Robert Hicks and his seven-piece swing band will provide the musical stylings
for the evening, so don't forget to bring your dancing shoes. And our very
own Frank Vickers, auctioneer extraordinaire, will once again bring the house
to its knees for charity. Amen!

Schedule of Events:
6:00-6:45    Reception, hors d'oeuvre and hosted beverages
6:45-8:00    Dinner Buffet
8:00-9:00    Door Prizes and Auction
9:00-11:30  Dance the night away......

We are looking forward to a great time!

If you have any questions or suggestions, please see your Assistant today.

Thanks.

Mollie


This morning a draft of RAC's Inflation Model Review was discussed with Anjam.

All points as presented in the draft were agreed upon.

Also, four new points were amended as suggested by Anjam:

The RPI short-term model could be improved by a combination of the
information available from the GILTS and RPI Swaps market.
Add:  "This is an issue across all Enron's econometric models." to section
PLLU and DZCV Short-term, First Point.
To implement some of the suggestions requires additional statistical and
programming resources.
Additionnal human resources with advanced econometric modelling skills are
required given the current workload of the european research team.

Please find the final version attached.

Please note that the short term solution has been to freeze the curve.

The medium to long term solution involves futher research towards a sounder
and more efficient model.
Given the current workload of the European Research Group, it is necessary to
hire a new member of staff with strong economics and econometrics background
to address this issue properly.

RAC will communicate to the Financial Trading Group and Risk Management the
actions to take as the curve will be frozen.

Thanks,

Rodrigo


Sara and I were told this morning, by our London office, that the MG
acquisition has closed.  Based on what we have heard about MG's New York
activities, that may mean that Enron is now the owner of some
CFTC/NFA-licensees (such as FCM's, CTA's, pool operators, etc.).

I realize we may well not have acquired the domestic businesses to which I am
referring, and if we have, someone may already be addressing this.
Regardless -- do you think it would be a good idea for us to focus on this
Monday, i.e., get with whoever is overseeing the MG acquisition from ENA
Legal's perspective, and just make sure futures regulatory issues are being
properly addressed?  let me know what you think -- Bob


i have to go back into lavo's office in a few minutes, then i have to go to lunch with john and one of our research guys from chicago, i will be back around 1:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

come down here and visit me