---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Cchao@cook-inlet.com on 04/12/2001 08:44:48 AM
To: matthew.lenhart@enron.com, steve.south@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Staples Center & Houston Astros

Hey boys,

It looks like we got tickets to the Astros baseball games. If you guys are
interested, let me know and I will reserve it for you. Please pass this
along to Frank for me.

Steve - you can take your dozen kids to the game:)

Have a great Easter weekend!

> HOUSTON ASTRO TICKETS at Enron Field:
> http://astros.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/hou/ballpark/hou_ballpark_seating.jsp
>
> * 25-Apr-01 Astros  Braves  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 27-Apr-01 Astros  Marlins  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 20-May-01 Astros  Reds  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 20-May-01 Astros  Reds  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 3-Jul-01 Astros  Diamondbacks 7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 3-Jul-01 Astros  Diamondbacks 7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 17-Jul-01 Astros  Indians  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 17-Jul-01 Astros  Indians  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 1-Aug-01 Astros  Mets  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 2-Aug-01 Astros  Mets  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 16-Aug-01 Astros  Pirates    4
> Sec. 112 (3rd Base)
> * 18-Aug-01 Astros  Pirates  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 7-Sep-01 Astros  Brewers    4
> Sec. 112 (3rd Base)
> * 9-Sep-01 Astros  Brewers  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 23-Sep-01 Astros  Cubs  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 25-Sep-01 Astros  Cardinals 1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
>
Cindy


Ha!  I appreciate the complement but I like my current job just fine--all I
have to do is crap on a contract now and then and argue with Mary Kay all day
long.  Piece of cake!  DF

Steven Harris
06/19/2000 10:53 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Pueblo

Excellent questions! Are you sure you don't want a job in the Commercial
Group? You talent as a deal maker is definitely underutilized.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           06/19/2000 10:27 AM

To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, John M
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Bill Votaw@ECT, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Pueblo

Thanks for the extremely helpful analysis Steve and John.  I'm getting a
pretty clear sense that this project isn't going anywhere as it is currently
configured.  Just to satisfy myself, though, let me throw out a couple of
observations for the group to react to, along the lines of Steve's "However"
section of his memo:

1.  Running this thing as a baseload unit won't work.  The fuel cost is a
killer.  However, I keep thinking about the $200/mwh 4 Corners spot price
someone mentioned on the phone.   Is there enough volatility at 4 Corners to
support a peaking merchant plant?  How often are those types of opportunities
available, and could a power plant in Alb. capture that upside by
transporting power to 4 Corners over PNMs system?

2.  We have been assuming that the power plant should be a baseload plant.
Someone on the phone last week had some numbers indicating that the DOE/DOD
electric load at Kirtland had a fairly high load factor.  I think we have all
assumed further that the plant should run at a high load factor to sell
surplus power into the grid (either at 4 Corners or, after N.M. elec.
restructuring, into the Alb. area).   I just found the numbers I was
remembering on the conf. call--1998 peak load was 63.6 mw, and total annual
1998 consumption was 334.5 million Kwh.  By my lawyer-math, that is about a
60% load factor for DOE.  If the DOE load is only 60% L.F., and the plant
only generates surplus power when it can capture profit opportunities that
arise when the market clearing price at 4 Corners or in Albuquerque exceeds
some benchmark rate ($.05/Kwh?  $.10/Kwh?  higher?)  the plant might run at a
30-40% load factor on an annual basis.  The question is can we reduce the
capital cost significantly by building a peaker instead of a baseload unit?

3.  Could we get debt financing for a 140 mw plant that had a baseload demand
charge contract for only 65 mw (i.e., DOE) but sold the rest of its output
into the grid only when profit opportunities arose?

4.  If the answer to 3. is no, would ENA backstop the debt financing by
signing a demand charge contract for all surplus power over and above what
the government needs?   At what price?  Based on its knowledge of volatility
and profit opportunities currently available at 4 Corners, and future profit
opportunities that will be available in Albuq. is that just a dumb bet, or
would ENA get interested if someone else (i.e., DOE) split the risk and
reward?

John, how much of the information in your analysis could be sanitized in a
way that we could provide it to Dennis Langley?  If we pull the plug on the
project, I'd like to be in a position that we could let him in on some of our
information on why the turbines we would use can't provide acceptable
economics.  I don't expect that we'd want to disclose the swap value analysis
in Steve's memo, however.

Thanks again, and I'd appreciate anyone's reaction to the above questions.
DF

Stephen Thome@ECT
06/16/2000 06:12 PM
To: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES
cc: John M Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Votaw@ECT, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven Harris@ENRON, Drew
Fossum@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg@ENRON

Subject: Re: Pueblo

John's proposed plant costs are consistent with what we have seen for our
ongoing LM6000 development.   I have priced 130 MW at Four Corners  assuming
Permian gas plus 50 cents for transport.  This also assumes $4.70 per MWh for
O&M and an 8000 heat rate.

For an hourly 7x24 product, the intrinsic value of the gas-power swap is
$52.5 million on a 20 year deal, well below the $108 million estimate of
constructing the facility.  A ten year swap is worth only $42 million (NPV =
-66 m ).  That implies a market mid-price of $34 per MWh levelized over the
period.

Using the ENA Power and Gas structuring model and curves, we can determine
the following:
1.  New build gas turbines cannot compete against the New Mexico market on
price.
2.  LM6000 CCGT efficiency gain does not pay for HRSG and ST over a ten year
period.

However:
1.  Transmission constraints could create market value in Albuquerque that
does not exist at Four Corners.
2.  ENA's power prices typically undersell the market.
3.  Commodity pricing does not accurately value capacity or reliability in
constrained markets.

If Enron wants to do a deal in Albuquerque, we should be selling capacity and
reliability.  Given the number of power- critical industries in the area, we
could look at siting several remote units at different locations in the
city.  Numerous chip manufacturing facilities and the Kirtland base could
support several LM6000's for power reliability that is specific to their
installations.

I might also suggest that peaking units would have advantages over CCGT
units.  Existing generation already provides ample baseload supply, however,
the production of peak and intermediate energy is not necessarily well suited
to existing units.  LM6000's have exceptionally good ramp rates that provide
real value to a utility customer.  Not only can the HRSG/ST hinder the
flexibility of the units, it can add substantial capital and operating
expense with little real market benefit.

We should also explore the ability to schedule load.  If the DOE wants to
peak for a test, would it be willing or able to schedule a test for the
off-peak hours?  Under those circumstances, we might be able to cut them a
break on power and provide reliability of supply.

Steve Thome

503-464-3708

John M Rose@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/15/2000 06:53 PM
To: Bill Gang@EES
cc: , Stephen Thome@ECT
Subject: Pueblo

Bill,

Yesterday, we decided to look at two options for Pueblo; a 60 MW case and a
140 MW case.  In order to match these outputs as closely as possible with
available equipment, I made the following selections:

Case 1
Equipment     3 X GE LM 2500 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1
X 22 MW Steam Turbine Generator
Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft   67 MW
Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F)  73.4 MW
Heat Rate at avg. conditions  8170 Btu/kWh (HHV)

Case 2
Equipment     3 X GE LM 6000 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1
X 44 MW Steam Turbine Generator
Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft   130 MW
Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F)  143.7 MW
Heat Rate at avg. conditions  7900 Btu/kWh (HHV)

There is a wide fluctuation in ambient temperature in Albuquerque and I sized
the blocks based on 95 deg F but used the annual average output at 60 deg F
for estimating power sales.  I have attached files that show the build-up of
the estimated EPC price for the plants.

The required power prices are projected in a simple-minded economics file
attached.  The projections are based on:

70% debt financing at 10% rate.
10-year project and debt life.
8500 hours per year at average output (97% capacity factor).
Gas at $4.40/MMBtu.

The results turn out pretty much as anticipated.  Even with the larger plant,
we'd have to sell the power for over 6c/kWh.


---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/03/2001
04:47 PM ---------------------------
From: Debbie Nowak/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 04:11 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: CONFIRMATION: April 20, 2001 Executive Forum - Rev.

This is to confirm your attendance for the Friday, April 20, 2001, Executive
Forum to be hosted by The Office of the Chairman.  The Forum will begin at
3:00 p.m. and ends at 4:30 p.m in the Enron Building 50M.

If you have any additional questions, please feel free to give me a call.

Thank you.

Debbie Nowak
Executive Development
713.853.3304


Thanks again.


Following up on our conversation re: a visit to Santa Fe when you come to
Houston, check out the Website for The Bishop's Lodge in Santa Fe
(www.bishopslodge.com).   Some friends of mine bought a weekend there at a
silent auction at a charity event recently and their brochure looked great.
The website has pictures, prices, activities at the resort, and a hyperlink
to the Website for the Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce which lists the
activities going on in Santa Fe.  I think you are going to be too late for
their summer opera series, but I took a look and there appears to be other
fun things going on.  The website for the lodge shows a fabulous looking
pool, horseback riding and shooting.  Take a look.


FYI. Certain aspects of this presentation will relate to PPA's/tolling
agreements/interconnection studies and agreements  relating to Enron
developed generation assets from which we intend to purchase power, etc.

The cost/benefit would probably be marginal for you, but I will be there, and
will get you any interesting handouts.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001 11:36
AM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 02:20 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/ENRON@enronXgate,
Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jordan
Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate, Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron,
Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jim
Desrochers/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Murphy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron,
Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate, Gareth
Bahlmann/ENRON@enronXgate, Julia H Chin/ENRON@enronXgate, Brenda L
Funk/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, William Fleenor/ENRON@enronXgate, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Asset Financing - Structured Finance Presentation

We are planning a presentation on certain structure and contracting issues
related to power plant asset financing on Thursday, May 10th.  The
presentation will include lunch from Treebeard's and will begin at 11:30.  We
have scheduled 2.5 hours for the presentation; it may be shorter, depending
on the number of questions.

We plan to include the Portland folks by video-conference.   If you know of
others who would benefit from this presentation, please pass on this
invitation; I have not intended to exclude anyone who may want to attend.  If
there are others at remote locations, please let me or Dina Snow know so that
we can arrange for video-conferencing.  John, I asked Shirley for the names
of your contracts folks and have included them; I still have no information
as to whom else you want to include.  Therefore, please forward this to your
team members as you see fit.

Please RSVP to Dina Snow at X57099 or by e-mail to dina.snow@enron.com by
Tuesday, May 8th.

We will e-mail the conference room location when it is confirmed.

Thanks,

Rose


Laura:
Attached are the letters that I referenced in the previous email.  The
letters:

oppose SBX33--Burton (state takeover of the private electric utilities'
transmission lines)
oppose  SBX6--Burton (state takes significant position in generation, gas &
electric transmission, energy conservation, renewable resources, real-time
meters
support SBX5--Sher (increase funding for energy efficiency)

Again, if you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me at 415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff

 - sbx 33 oppose letter revised.doc
 - sbx5 support letter.doc
 - sbx 6 oppose letter


As regards to US Physical Power, I agree.

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 10:37 AM -----

	Rhonda L Denton
	01/22/2001 10:34 AM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Response 1/19/01

No changes to profile today.

From: Karen Lambert on 01/22/2001 10:23 AM
To: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Allan/LON/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Lafuze/Enron
Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, Molly.Lafuze@enron.net, Alexia
Gonzales/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Furter/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Wells/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON, cbalfou@enron.com, Laurie
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina LaVallee/CAL/ECT@ECT, James Scully/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matilda
Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi
Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Diana Andel/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Response 1/19/01

EnronOnline.com
01/19/2001
Amended Credit Responses Released by Credit -- no new online counterparties
to review
Please complete both contract tabs on the Credit Response by 3:00 p.m. CST
today, if possible.
The document is located in our subdirectory O:\EOL\GLOBAL_EOL and titled
011901 with Ks.xls.


David:
FYI pursuant to my voice mail.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
05:52 PM ---------------------------

MaryF@riskinc.com on 04/13/2000 05:06:21 PM
To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
cc: David.Kistler@enron.com, PaulV@riskinc.com
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Carol,

Paul VanderMarck forwarded to me your e-mail (see below) regarding the
confidentiality agreement.  We are fine with entering into a new
confidentiality agreement, based on the form agreed to by the parties a
year ago, however, a couple of changes to the form are needed.

1.  We would like to make sure that our definition of confidential
information is expanded to include our "cleaned" historical weather data
("Weather Data"), weather-risk internet application ("Web Site"),
associated methodologies, user identification codes, and passwords.

2.  The purpose of the disclosure of RMS confidential information would be
to enhance Enron's understanding of RMS technology and services and their
uses within the marketplace.

3.  Enron is granted by RMS, a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to
use the Weather Data for internal evaluation purposes only.  Enron agrees
that it will not modify, create derivative works of, or distribute the
Weather Data to any third party.

4.  Enron agrees to provide RMS with its comments, criticisms, and
suggestions for changes with respect to the Weather Data and Web Site,
including identifying any errors or malfunctions in the operation thereof.

If you can include these items into the new confidentiality agreement
(based on the one the parties executed a year ago), we would be agreeable
to signing it.

Also, our CEO and CFO will be traveling next week.  If it is at all
possible, we would like to get this confidentiality agreement from you no
later than mid day  (PST) on Friday, April 14, 2000 to secure the
appropriate RMS signature.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  I can be reached at (650)
617-6593.  My facsimile is (650) 617-6565.

Thank you.

Mary Futch
RMS Contracts Department

----- Forwarded by Mary Futch/RISKINC on 04/13/00 02:54 PM -----

                    Paul
                    VanderMarck          To:     Mary Futch/RISKINC@RISKINC
                                         cc:
                    04/13/00             Subject:     Confidentiality
Agreement
                    01:55 PM

----- Forwarded by Paul VanderMarck/RISKINC on 04/13/00 01:55 PM -----

                    "Carol St Clair"
                    <Carol.St.Clair@        To:     PaulV@riskinc.com
                    enron.com>              cc:     "David Kistler"
                                            <David.Kistler@enron.com>
                    04/13/00 01:22          Subject:     Confidentiality
Agreement
                    PM

Paul:
I have spoken with Dave Kistler about the form of CA that you sent to him.
What
we prefer to do is to use the form that was agreed to a year ago (a copy of
which I have attached).  We can either (1) do a new CA based on this form
or (2)
since this CA does not expire for another year, do a side letter that
provides
that the term "Project" as used in this CA means both the project that is
currently described and the new project that we are about to engagae in
with
you.  Please let me know your preference.  My number is 713-853-3989.

Carol

(See attached file: Risk Management Solutions CA 1.doc)

(See attached file: Risk Management Solutions CA 1.doc)

 - Risk Management Solutions CA 1.doc


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ??????
Date:
Subject:


Greg,

In talking to the Interest Rate group.  They did not do a Rate Swap between
ECC and RISKMANTRA.  I've been told that they simply hedged the cashflow
rather than doing the internal interest rate swap.  This info came from Clara
Carrington.

Thanks,
Joe

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
02:40 PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 10/03/2000 08:45 AM
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Greg:  I spoke with Joe and he IS working on the internal rate swap with John
(i.e., ECC/RMT and RMT/ENA).  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 08:44 AM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	10/02/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Greg,

The matrix I was given doesn't mention an internal rate swap.  I'll have to
check with John Griffith in Structuring.

Sara,
Do you know if the Interest Rate swap is also being backed out to RMT?

Thanks
Joe

Greg Johnston
10/02/2000 02:54 PM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Joe, I understood that there should be an internal interest rate swap in
addition to the commodity swap that you just faxed back to me.  Is someone
other than you preparing that document?

Thanks

Greg

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           10/02/2000 01:07 PM

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

I have recieved everything.  I'll send copies of the TD & RBC signatures as
soon as I recieve them.  The Risk Management deal you signed is, in effect,
the Confirm between ENA and ECC.  For tax purposes, ENA does not deal
directly with ECC, so the Risk Management vehicle takes the place of ENA.

Thanks,
Joe

Greg Johnston
10/02/2000 10:50 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

I believe that, as you requested, I have now had executed and returned to you
by fax copies of the commodity swaps between Enron Canada and each of RBC, TD
Bank and Risk Management as well as the two rate swaps between Enron Canada
and each of RBC and TD.  I believe the only other confirm requiring Enron
Canada's execution in this transaction is the back-to-back rate swap between
Enron Canada and ENA, whereby Enron Canada swaps the floating rate for the
fixed rate with ENA.  You can send that confirm directly to my attention by
e-mail and I will get it signed and sent back to you.  I understand that you
will be attending to obtaining counterparty execution of these confirms.
Could you do me a favor and, when you receive the fully executed confirms
back from the respective counterparties, fax fully executed copies of all the
confirms to my attention at 403-974-6707.  I am aggregating copies of all the
documents relating to this financing for our files and will need the executed
confirms as part of that process.

Thanks

Greg Johnston


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012813.txt


Hi I hope you had a happy thanksgiving
We went out to eat because my mom didn't want to cook.
Well see you soon
Julie


Scotty, many thanks.  All the best. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Scott Burdine" <Scott@hbb-law.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Scott+20Burdine+22+20+3CScott+40hbb-law+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	jderric@enron.com
Subject:	Recommendation Letter to St. Mary's

Jim, I mailed the recommendation letter and form for Jimmy to St. Mary's this morning.  Keep me posted.  Scotty


Michelle/Diane,
Assuming you received the updated file from Kathy, here's what I would like to see.

1.  Standard deviation by job group based on age, gender, ethnicity and performance rating
2.  Utilization of Forecast, Probability and/or Trend functions for age gender, ethnicity and performance rating to identify the likelihood of women and minorities promoted within the organization..

Please let me know if Jeanerette needs additional information.
ay
Andrea Yowman
Enron Corp
713-853-1477


From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           03/08/2001 04:38 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: QV7909 - EES rebook

Eric,

For QV7909.1, please change Buyer shortname to ENRONENESERINC and Seller
shortname to RISKMANTRA.

Thanks,
Joe


Mike, this appears to be a very reasonable settlement - proceed on this
basis.  I assume this keeps my number in and around the $600 to $615MM for
the 2000's all in.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
03:27 PM ---------------------------

Mike J Miller
09/12/2000 01:55 PM
To: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  (bcc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

Dick,

I have done some more research on the cost versus Peaker Fee issue.  The
numbers from ENA's side lay out as follows:

ENA Payments vs. NEPCO Costs  $4,449,000
ABB Breaker Costs/Estimate to Complete $   720,000
Reduction in Variable Overheads  $3,000,000
IDC on ENA Overpayments   $   200,000
Fixed Overhead Charged to Variable  $   180,000
Westinghouse L.D.'s- Gleason   $1,800,000
Westinghouse L.D.'s- Wheatland  $   500,000
Preliminary Total Reduction
in Project Costs                  $10,849,000

ENA Payments vs. NEPCO Costs:  ENA paid according to pre-determined cash
curves every month.  NEPCO's actual costs appear to be coming in about $4.5
MM less per the audit results that we both reviewed last Friday.

ABB Breaker Costs/Estimate to Complete:  When we met last Friday, there were
$1,459,000 of Open P.O.'s and other items that NEPCO still needed to
investigate and closeout, you have a copy of the detailed schedule prepared
by Amy Spoede.  Of the $1,459,000, there was $720,000 showing as still owing
to ABB for Circuit Breakers at Wilton Center.  ABB has informed ENA that they
have been payed in full for quite some time, thus I believe that this
$720,000 is an accounting phantom that NEPCO needs to clear up.

Reduction in Variable Overheads:  The $3,000,000 in variable overhead
reduction is the number that you offered to cut this cost in our meeting last
Friday.

IDC on ENA Overpayments:  As part of our agreement with EE&CC/NEPCO, ENA
agreed to pay 2000 peaker construction costs based upon cash curves versus
actual invoices.  The cash curves consistently overestimated NEPCO's actual
disbursements, even after quarterly audits and true-ups.  NEPCO currently
owes ENA over $200,000 in IDC at the cost of capital charged by Enron Corp.

Fixed Overhead Charged to Variable:  Some EE&CC/NEPCO personnel coded time
against variable overheads that should have been charged against the
pre-agreed fixed overheads.

Westinghouse L.D.'s:  ENA paid Westinghouse directly for the turbines.  ENA
has held back $3.5 MM of retainage pending resolution of L.D.'s.
EE&CC's/ENA's position is that Westinghouse owes $2.3 MM of L.D.'s ($1.8 MM @
Gleason, $0.5MM @ Wheatland).  The aforementioned L.D.'s are for delivery and
schedule delays at Gleason and Wheatland.  There is an additional $1.0-1.6 MM
of performance L.D.'s for missing heat rate guarantees at Gleason.  ENA will
negotiate the performance L.D. settlement directly with Westinghouse because
the cure will be getting additional MW's in trade against the L.D.'s.
Otherwise, Westinghouse can cure by minor unit modifications and re-test
versus paying cash L.D.'s.  However, the Delivery and Schedule L.D.'s will
still be negotiated by EE&CC.

Peaker Fee Settlement:  Based on our last meeting and additional research, I
suggest the following path to quickly resolve the Peaker fee amount and
payment.  If EE&CC will take over the risk/reward of the Delivery & Schedule
L.D. issue with Westinghouse, then ENA will recharacterize the amounts
detailed above as Peaker fee payment.  If EE&CC is successful in keeping all
the Schedule L.D.'s from Westinghouse, then it would have a $10.85 MM fee
versus $9.2 MM.  EE&CC only needs to keep $650,000 of the $2.3 MM of
Westinghouse Schedule L.D.'s to have a $9.2 MM fee.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed from here.

Regards,

Mike J Miller


Stevens-

We've moved up the food chain at Destin, but have not received a response
yet.  I'll be out next week.  Check with Joe Casas to see if he hears anything

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 03/14/2001 10:39:16 AM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc: Dan_Cole@eott.com
Subject: BTU protest

Susan,

I know you are quite busy with other items, but have you had time to
discuss the BTU protest with the Enron attorneys?  As I told you before,
Rebel would be more than happy to write "the letter", but I believe it will
have to be submitted by Enron as the shipper.

Thanks,

Stevens


For questions contact Robert Johnston at x39934.

Court Case Denies Rate Hikes

As forecast in our report yesterday, the Federal Court in Los Angeles refused to allow the two California utilities to raise rates to recoup undercollections of their power costs since last August.  We had expected that the court would rule in favor of the utilities, but push the rate hike question to an appeals court.  Instead, Judge Ronald Lew refused to rule on the case because of technical considerations and postponed a hearing until March 5th.  The utilities now face an imminent end to creditor forbearance without the prospect of short-term rate hikes.  Edison reaches the end of its grace period for a $200 million payment today and a $600 million payment on Thursday.  Absent the political cover of the court to impose rate hikes, the Governor and the state legislature are in an equally tenuous position.

Bankruptcy Grows More Likely

Regardless of the legal technicalities, the bottom line is the same.  As we have cautioned since last Wednesday, there is a serious risk that a creditor or
group of creditors could push for bankruptcy, perhapsas soon as tomorrow when the period of forbearance agreed to by financial creditors runs out.
Before this ruling, there was reasonable assurance that the utilities would be restored to health by their court victory. Now there is real fear a coherent deal is
unravelling, and that it will not take much for a small group of financial creditors to break ranks. And the prospects for supplier creditors now look
much bleaker and more dangerous. And there is an increased temptation for the utilities to declare bankruptcy and take their chances with a judge rather
than the California assembly. The politicians will try to find a way to prevent bankruptcy, but it will now be difficult.

Disarray in the Legislature

For now, the only card still being played is the "I give you a dollar, you give me a hot dog" plan, as State Senator Burton accurately summed it up. The state
 pumps money into the utilities in return for some kind of asset -- warrants, transmission lines, whatever, anything that can be brandished in front of the voters as
proof that the utilities suffered and paid. But "there is little or no energy among legislators for either of the proposed solutions," one senior figure in Sacramento
 told our source yesterday afternoon. "Legislators are running scared. And I don't know of a single legislator in either house, on either side, who has the slightest
sympathy for the utiltiies now. They think the utiltiies have either been incompetent or shrewd or both." The ruling will in all likelihood send officials back to the
 drawing board. "Davis will propose a kind of shadow plan by Friday, but there will be no real substance in it. What are we supposed to do in just four
days? There will not be a real substantive plan for three weeks, I think, at the earliest." That period of uncertainty and lack of energy in the legislature could
panic the creditors now.

Bankruptcy Court

If Davis fails to cobble together a last-minute deal for rate hikes and some kind of purchase of transmission assets, then all parties will have to do a workout
 in federal bankruptcy court.  The most likely scenario (which we flagged last week) is that the small IPPs file an involuntary bankruptcy against Edison, followed
possibly by PG&E.  Involuntary bankruptcy would shield the utilities from creditor lawsuits and temporarily relieve them from debt payments.  There is also
speculation in the press this morning that some creditors are talking about a Ch.7 or liquidation proceeding, but that cannot yet be confirmed by sources.


I was just speaking to Edmund Cooper about various swap matters, and he
wanted me to ask the group to not make changes to his entries (for ECT
International) in the Master Swap Agreement Database.  Someone went into one
of his and added a note that the Trade Option Exemption was deleted when it
wasn't.  If you think something is in error or needs to be added, please
consult with him.  Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: 	TruOrange@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:16 AM
To:	TruOrange@aol.com
Subject:	True Orange, October 22, 2001, Part 2 of 3

Recruiting Roundup
Tyler DB Matt Melton, 5-11, 190, 4.43, committed to Texas last week  "because
I knew I wanted to stay in state and, after visiting A&M and Texas
(unofficially), I just like Texas better."
He said he visited UT unofficially because he wants to take his official
visit the December 14 weekend to attend the Longhorn football banquet.
Melton, who has 40 tackles and two interceptions so far this year, said he
had offers "from about 15 or 16 schools, including Texas, A&M, Purdue, TCU,
Baylor and West Virginia."
He is the 16th recruit to commit to Texas. He is a member of my Fabulous 50.
The other recruits who have committed to Texas include nine recruits who are
listed on one or more national top 100 teams.
They are WR Marquis Johnson, 6-3, 200, 4.48, of Centennial High School in
Champaign, Illinois;  DE Chase Pittman, 6-5, 263, 4.7, of Shreveport Evangel;
LB Garnet Smith, 6-3, 221, 4.54, of Arlington Lamar, DTs Sonny Davis, 6-1,
320, 5.0, of Gulf Coast JC in Mississippi and formerly of Austin Lanier, Earl
Anderson, 6-4, 270, 4.8, of San Marcos, Lyle Sendlein, 6-4,  260, 4.8, of
Scottsdale Chaparral, the two-time defending Class 4A champion in Arizona;
OLs  Brett Valdez, 6-4, 310, 5.1, of  Brownwood and Neale Tweedie, 6-5, 260,
4.9, of Allen;  and TE David Thomas, 6-3, 210, 4.6, of Wolfforth Frenship.
Davis made all of the top national lists last year.
The other Longhorn pledges are DT Tully Janszen, 6-4, 255, 4.78, of Keller;
LBs Brian Robison, 6-3, 245, 4.6, of Splendora and Marcus Myers, 6-3, 220,
4.5, of Pflugerville Connally;   WR Dustin Miksch, 6-0, 165, 4.4, of Round
Rock Westwood;  QB Billy Don Malone, 6-2 1/2, 185, 4.7, of  Paris North
Lamar, and  RB/Ath Clint Haney, 5-11, 190, 4.27 of Smithson Valley.
* * * *
Michael Williams, the big and fast linebacker from Lindale I wrote about it
my last issue, went to the Oklahoma-Baylor game Saturday and committed to the
Sooners.
When I talked to him Sunday night, he called it "a soft commitment," and
said, "I'm still going to visit Texas on December 14 and I might visit
Minnesota and Texas Tech, too."
I think he's in about the same boat as Garnet Smith, the Arlington Lamar
linebacker who is committed to Texas.
Both say they are committed, but both want to look around a little bit to see
if they find anything better.
I always compare it to being engaged and dating other people, which makes
getting married somewhat iffy.
Williams probably will wind up at OU and Smith probably will wind up at
Texas, but both cases will bear watching right up to and through signing day
in February.

Several top national recruits were in Austin for the Texas-Colorado game,
including DE Bryan Pickryl of Jenks, Oklahoma, who was there on his official
visit.
He wasn't expected back at home until Monday, so I wasn't able to talk to him
after his visit, but before his visit he told me he has narrowed his choices
to Oklahoma, Texas and Missouri.
Top Texas players who were at the game included RB Albert Hardy of Galena
Park, MLB Aaron Harris of North Mesquite, DE Travis Leitko of The Woodlands
and WR Robert Timmons of Flower Mound Marcus.
Players already committed to UT who were there included Smith, Anderson,
Thomas, Janszen, Myers and Miksch.
This Longhorn recruiting class is already ranked No. 5 in the country by a
couple of national recruiting services.
The ranking will improve dramatically if the Horns hold what they have and
add a few top national recruits like DT Rodrique Wright of Alief Hastings, QB
Vincent Young of Houston Madison, DE Larry Dibbles of Lancaster, and some of
the players who attended the game Saturday, like Pickryl, Hardy, Harris,
Leitko and Timmons.
The Horns won't get all of those guys, but they
(continued on page 6)

Recruiting . . (continued from page 3)
will get several of them and their chances are very good with Wright,
Dibbles, Harris, Hardy and Timmons, if he walks the straight and narrow path
for the rest of the season.
They also are close to 50-50 with Pickryl, Young, and Leitko.
If Williams does follow through on his plans to visit Texas the Dec. 14
weekend, his pledge to OU might turn out to be really soft.
Of course, the same could be said of Smith's commitment to Texas, if he
follows through on his announced plans to take other visits.
* * * *
Texas has pledges from five players on my 25-man "difference maker" list,
including No. 4 DT Anderson, No. 11 LB Smith, No. 17 LB Brian Robison of
Splendora, No. 23 OL Brett Valdez of Brownwood and No. 24 QB Billy Don Malone
of Paris North Lamar.
The Horns have a pretty good shot at everyone in the top seven on that list -
No. 1 DT  Wright, No. 2 QB Young, No. 3 DE Dibbles, No. 5 DE Leitko, No. 6 RB
Hardy and No. 7 LB Harris .
They won't get all of that group, but they might get most of them.
* * * *
I think the Longhorns will sign at least four  players from the eight-member
group of superstars that includes Wright, Dibbles, Harris, Hardy, Pickryl,
Young, Lietko and Timmons.
If they do, this class will rank very high nationally, probably in the top 3.
That would give the Longhorns four straight super classes heading into next
season and, for the first time, the oldest group of that foursome would be
seniors or juniors who have redshirted.
* * * *
The Longhorns, with 16 commitments already, have a couple of shaky ones in
Smith, who plans to take other visits, and one player who has an uphill
battle to qualify.
They can take more than the normal 25 limit in a single year because Pittman
plans to graduate from Shreveport Evangel in December and enroll at Texas in
January, which will let him count against last year's total.
Pickryl also plans to graduate early, so he also could be counted back to
last year if he signs with Texas.
I expect the Longhorns to take commitments from another 10 to 12 recruits.
The number will be on the low side if Smith stays solid and Pickryl goes
alsewhere, but it will rise if Smith strays and Pickryl comes aboard.
* * * *
Sonny Davis suffered a torn ACL in a recent game at Gulf Coast JC in
Mississippi and is due to undergo knee surgery this week.
His mother told me he still hopes to graduate early and enroll at Texas in
January. The surgery probably would knock him out of most or all of the
contact work, but should allow him to be fully recovered by the start of next
season.

Game Quotes . .
"We played poorly. We turned the ball over and could not overcome the
adversity we created for ourselves. I give Texas a lot of credit. They have
good players who are well coached. I feel bad that we didn't give them a
better game."
- Colorado head coach Gary Barnett
* * * *
"We did not want to be one dimensional. We knew it wouldn't be easy to run on
Colorado, but we knew we had to keep at it. I thought the offensive line did
a good job and Cedric (Benson) did a great job."
- Texas offensive coordinator Greg Davis
* * * *
"We worked all week against two tight ends and I think in this game they ran
two tight ends maybe four times. They did a great job of coming and doing
exactly what we weren't planning on. But our guys did a pretty good job of
improvising."
- UT defensive coordinator Carl Reese
* * * *
"We forced some turnovers today, and when you got most of the turnovers, you
usually win the game."
- UT linebacker De'Andre Lewis
* * * *
"Sloan Thomas is probably the most underrated wide receiver in the country."
- Longhorn QB Chris Simms, talking about the backup wide receiver who has
scored two touchdowns in each of the last two games
* * * *
"We did self destruct a little bit, but I don't want to take anything away
from Texas. They came out ready to play on both sides of the ball, as well as
on special teams. We made a lot of mistakes today and they had us on our
heels throughout the second half."
- Colorado linebacker Joey Johnson
* * * *
"He's an unbelievable running back. He runs hard and that move he put on to
break that long gain on the shovel pass at the end of the first half was
unbelievable."
- Simms, talking about Longhorn freshman running back Cedric Benson
* * * *
"They beat us in every phase of the game. I don't think it was one particular
thing. We had some turnovers and they put together some long drives. They
also did a nice job in the punt return game."
- Buff linebacker Robbie Robinson
* * * *
"We can't keep our defense on the field that long. We let the defense down.
We self-destructed and Texas took advantage of everything."
- Colorado running back Cortlen Johnson
* * * *
"We not only won, but we dominated, and Colorado is a good football team."
- UT head coach Mack Brown

Texas-Colorado Statistics

Scoring Summary
Texas            7       17       10        7   -      41
Colorado         0        7          0        0 -       7

UT - R. Williams 3 pass from Simms (Mangum kick) 9:09 1Q (7 plays 60 yds)
UT - Mangum 21 FG 11:47 2Q (7 plays, 16 yds)
CU - C. Johnson 9 run (Flores kick) 8:32 2Q (7 plays, 65 yds)
UT - Benson 12 run (Mangum kick) 3:22 2Q (4 plays, 35 yds)
UT - Benson 4 run (Mangum kick) 1:10 2Q (5 plays, 85 yds)
UT - Thomas 24 pass from Simms (Mangum kick) 6:47 3Q (8 plays, 69 yds)
UT - Mangum 34 FG 3:53 3Q (4 plays, 1 yd)
UT - Thomas 29 pass from Simms (Mangum kick) 12:49 4Q (4 plays 47 yds)

        Official Attendance: 83,156

Team Statistics

                        Texas    Colorado
First Downs           25             12
Rushing             8              5
Passing           12               7
Penalty             5              0
Rushing Attempts, Net Yards          40-161         32-124
Net Yards Passing        264            165
Passes Comp., Att., Int.                21-33-0         15-28-1
Total Plays, Offense                 73-425      60-289
Avg. Gain per Play                 5.8         4.8
Fumbles Lost                    0 of  1      3 of 4
Penalties, Yards                      5-40        9-57
Punts, Avg.                  6-35.5       8-33
Time of Possession      33:33        26:27
Third-Down Conversions               3 of 12        2 of 14
Fourth-Down Conversions     0 of  1      0 of 1
Sacks by Team, Yds Lost      1-7          2-16

Individual Statistics

Texas
Rushing - Benson 23-100, 2 TDs; B. J. Johnson 2-46; Mock 2-10; Jeffery 1-7;
I. Williams 3-6; Team 1-minus 2; Ike 3-minus 3; Simms 5-m inus 3.
Passing -  Simms 17-28, 234 yds, 3 TD, 0 Int.; Applewhite 4-5, 30 yds, 0 TD,
0 Int.
Receiving - S. Thomas 3-63, 2 TD; Benson 3-59; B. J. Johnson 4-52; R.
Williams 4-45, 1 TD; Shanahan 3-26; Scaife 1-7; Ike 1-5; Matthews 1-4;
Trissel 1-3.
Colorado
Rushing - Purify 7-51; C. Brown 8-26; C. Johnson 6-22, 1 TD; Hodge 2-13;
Hollowell 1-12; HYouston 7-7; Pesavento 1-minus 7.
Passing - Pesavento 15-27, 165 yds, 0TD, 1 Int.; Hodge  0-1, 0 yds, 0 TD, 0
Int.
Receiving - Graham 5-58; C. Johnson 2-28; Cormier 1-20; McCoy 2-19; Brunson
2-15; C. Brown 1-10; Purify 1-8; Sypniewski 1-7.
Tackles by Texas Players, Unasst., Asst., Total
Lewis 3-5-8; Brooks 5-2-7; Rawls 3-4-7; Pearson 4-2-6; Thornton 4-1-5; Jammer
3-1-4; Vasher 3-0-3; Babers 3-0-3; T. Jones 3-0-3; Tubbs 2-0-2; Boyd 0-2-2;
Anderson 1-0-1; Wilkins 1-0-1; Ungar 1-0-1; Hill 1-0-1; D. Johnson 1-0-1;
Redding 0-1-1; Doiron 0-1-1; Hightower 0-1-1; Gordon 0-1-1; Trahan 0-1-1.
Tackles for Losses:  Babers 1-minus 6; Tubbs 1-minus 3; Wilkins 1-minus 2;
Doiron 1-minus 1; Lewis 1-minus 1.
Sacks: Lewis 1-minus 7.

Key Statistics

Colorado had 244 yards offensively in the first half, but managed only 45 net
yards and just two first downs in the second half.

Subscribe To The E-Mail/Fax To Get Year-Round Football
& Recruiting Scoops !
Save Big As
An Internet Subscriber !
Whether you live close to Austin or far away, the True Orange E-Mail/Fax
Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn football and Longhorn recruiting
- instantly. It has about 110 to 120 timely e-mail/faxes a year, primarily
about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send your check to
True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip the coupon
below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail, just
include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (an $11 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange via the Internet  and to subscribe
to the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)

First BCS Standings Due Today

The first Bowl Championship Series standings are going to be released today
(Monday) and the Longhorns should rank just about seventh, which,
coincidentally, is where they are in both major polls this week.
What that mean is that Texas has a very good chance to land one of the four
major BCS bowl spots if they take care of business and win their final four
games to finish the regular season at 10-1.
Upsets have thinned the ranks of unbeaten teams in the last two weeks,
leaving only eight teams in major college football with perfect records.
They are No. 1 Miami, No. 2 Oklahoma, No. 3 Nebraska, No. 4 UCLA, No. 5
Virginia Tech, No. 10 Maryland, No. 14 Washington State and No. 16 Brigham
Young.
At least two of those teams will lose in the near future because Oklahoma and
Nebraska clash this week and Washington State and UCLA meet in early November.
The top two teams in the final BCS standings will play for the national title
in the Rose Bowl on January 3.
Texas coach Mack Brown and his Longhorns hope to be in that game, but their
chances are somewhere between very slim and none because Oklahoma would have
to lose twice in the regular season for that to happen and then the Horns
would have to beat the Big 12 North winner, probably Nebraska.
But, by winning out and finishing 10-1, the Longhorns would have a great
chance to play in the Sugar Bowl in New Orleans in the post-season.


Have you heard any more about this?  I didn't see it on my calendar.  This
does conflict with Philippe's Thursday staff meeting I believe.  Maybe
Philippe will cancel that.  Let me know.  Thanks. --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 05:36 PM
---------------------------
From: Laura Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/13/2001 08:08 AM
To: Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan
Bruce/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/ENRON@enronXgate,
Jay Webb/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Lite Bytz Panel Discussion

In recognition of the one-year anniversary of Enron Net Works (ENW), Beth
Perlman is hosting a panel discussion at the April 12th session of her Lite
Bytz weekly lunchtime series.  The panel, which will be comprised of ENW
leaders, will be open forum and interactive.  We will invite the audience to
submit questions in advance and also have the opportunity to present
questions directly to you, at the session.  Beth indicated that this special
presentation would not be complete without you.  This should be a fun and
presenter-friendly session with virtually no preparation on your part
required.  I will contact your assistant to confirm your availability for
this special anniversary session of Lite Bytz, scheduled for April 12, 2001,
11:30-1:00.


Can you guys look at preparing credit terms for the ISDA as you probably know
them better than I.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000 01:54
PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 07/28/2000 01:51 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Pacificorp Power Marketing ("PPM")

I received a call again from Gary Ordway.  Who will be preparing credit?
Gary asked that his credit person be copied and his name is John Fryer.
Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000 01:42 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/10/2000 02:25 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pacificorp Power Marketing ("PPM")

All:  I received a request from PPM to send our form of ISDA to document
trading.  We previously sent a draft to these guys on 1/13/99.  The only
difference is that they now want to trade and the Scottish Power acquisition
is done.  The contact is:

Gary Ordway
830 N.E. Holladay
Suite 200
Portland, Oregon  97232


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		2/11/2000
Task Start Date:	2/11/2000


Hello Vince,

We've now got some slick results on rigorous and replicable avg temp
forecasting models for twelve major U.S. cities, with implications for
weather derivative demand and supply (although they are not yet written
up formally).  Will you be in Phila anytime soon?  I would like to sit
down with you for a couple of hours to show you the results and
discuss.  Are you still interested in pursuing a joint project?  I am
excited about this.

All the best,

Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold
WP Carey Professor

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


Try Lynn Richardson for a primary contact. BUT, she would not be my first
choice for reliable good information.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT on 03/13/2001
01:42 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "LYNN RICHARDSON" <lerichrd@wapa.gov>
03/11/2001 09:06 PM

To: <amy.clemons@enron.com>, <Cara.Semperger@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: WACM Transmission Losses

Attached is a spreadsheet showing your entity's loss obligation to WACM for
the period March 1 through 10.  You have already received March 1-5
accounting last week.  However, I changed the tracking slightly and now all
the days of each month appear in one file, so that March 6th through the 10th
is the only new data you are receiving.

Please ensure that you are calculating and delivering the concurrent losses
with the parent tag.  As of this time, there were no prices posted for Palo
Verde nonfirm for March 9th or 10th.

Please let me know if you have specific feedback about something in the list
or if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Lynn Richardson
Public Utilities Specialist
RMR
(970) 461-7440

 - EnronMarch2001.xls


P.S.

I'd like to rear end you too.


Just for everyone's information - I've entered two buys from Seattle City
Light to negate an earlier sale of power to the company (Deal 317868). The
deals are as follows:

515404
STCA buys SCL
2/8/01-2/28/01
SP-15
Off Peak
$115.00

515420
LTCA buys SCL
3/1/01-3/31/01
SP-15
Off Peak
$115.00

I'm giving you this disclaimer either because you asked me to enter the deal,
the deal is in your book, or the deal will affect your calc. The volume is
shaped between 1 and 2 MW. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kate


When: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Stacey's desk

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This is the new hire that will be coming in on the 15th.


I can't open the attachment, can you?

K-

Kay Mann
01/30/2001 01:10 PM
To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Shaeffer redline

I ran a redline from the last version I had electronically.

I've forwarded the current version to Herman for his review and approval.
Due to some of the changes, Enron may need some revisions as well.

Kay


Attached is a transcript of the voicemail message I got from Dale McMaster.

I spoke to Dale on the telephone today and he said they are not following the
normal consultative process on this change but rather are just consulting the
following entities: members of the Operations Committee (Enron, Atco, Enmax,
Engage, IPCCAA, IPPSA), SaskPower, Powerex, CalPx, and WattEx.  Dale intends
to take these rule changes to the Power Pool Council for approval at their
meeting on Wednesday Nov 15 at 11:00 am.  He said this is part of the "Pool
Rule Change" elements of the 10 point plan released by ADRD on Nov 3.  I
asked Dale if I should copy any comments we may wish to submit to the ADRD
and he indicated that would be a good idea.

We can discuss how to proceed further at our meeting this afternoon.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/13/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Dale McMaster <Dale.McMaster@powerpool.ab.ca> on 11/10/2000 05:36:48 PM
To: "Rob Hemstock (E-mail)" <rhemsto@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: For your consideration

 - 00 11 09 Emergency Rules .doc


I need to get the attached info to assist with the CA litigation. Who should
I call?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 07:52 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/11/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Data Files Needed

Richard,
 Here are the specifics of what we need to get copied:

M:\NAHOUTRD\Houston\Power\Common\Electric\West\Incremnt\2000

We need all files copied from this directory.  These are the 2000 West Desk
Real Time spread sheets.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


202-434-5000 main


Vince,

I agree.  If you think that this candidate would be good for your group
specifically - I would invite him in directly.

Hope all is well.
Ashley

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/24/2000 04:09 PM
To: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Ashley,

This is one resume I got today. I think that it makes sense to invite him
for an interview directly with my group. He does not qualify as an analyst
candidate.
What do you think?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC


Christie,

Feb the 20th is the best time for me.

Vince

Christie Patrick
01/23/2001 11:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Hi Vince!

The best dates for me are the 16th or the 20th.

Please let me know!

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
11:29 PM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/23/2001 11:46:32 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>, "'christie.patrick@enron.com'"
<christie.patrick@enron.com>
cc: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Tiger Hosts:

This is a reminder that the deadline for setting up the Mid-Project review
dates for your Tiger Team is Friday, Jan 26.
The following are the remaining available dates/times.  Please let me know
what works best for you at your earliest convenience.

Monday, Feb 12    4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 13   4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Wed., Feb 14        4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Friday, Feb 16      10:00-12:00  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 20   6:30-8:30

Again, this will be based on a first come-first serve basis. You may come to
campus or this can be done by videoconference.  If you choose the latter,
please provide to me a call-in number for the conference.

Any questions, please contact the FAP office.

Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
215.573.8394   fax 215.573.5727
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------

Craig Breslau
12/19/2000 01:24 PM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ormet

Could you please send the service agreement into Koch for the Ormet
transaction.  This memo that I wrote to Scott details the rates that we have
negotiated with Koch.  Koch has to post our deal for five days, so could you
please try to send it out today if at all possible.  I am also sending you
the draft letter agreement that Koch sent to us which we will also need to
execute.  We will also need to put an IT agreement in place with Koch.  They
have offered the same discounted rates on an IT basis for any volumes above
the 15,000/d of FT.

Also, could you please arrange to put in place an IT agreement on Cypress for
delivery to Ormet Aluminum's Burnside,LA

Thanks for your help.

Craig
---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------

Craig Breslau
11/16/2000 04:37 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ormet

Scott:

Ormet's Burnside,LA Aluminum refinery is dually connected to Koch and Cypress.
The transport rates that  Koch has quoted for FT to Ormet are as follows:

From Bridgeline/Paradis or LRC/ Paradis .03 demand charge

from Venice     .05 demand charge

from the Mobile Bay pooling point on Koch .045 demand charge
(if we buy upstream of the pooling point then we would also pay a .0246
gathering fee on Mobile Bay)

In addition we will be charged .0022 ACA from any of these receipt points.

The fuel rate is 1.6%.  This will be passed on to Ormet.

Koch has agreed that any volumes in excess of the 15/d of FT will be at the
same discounted rate, but will flow on an IT basis.  If this IT is cut, we
still must use best efforts to transport from other receipt points on Koch or
on Cypress.  Ormet pays all additional transport costs.
Additionally, we have a price re-opener if Koch changes from monthly
balancing at any point during the contract term.
I am working with Koch to get secondary delivery points on Koch in the event
that the desk wants to take the gas elsewhere (i.e. if Ormet doesn't need the
gas or if you choose to deliver off of Cypress).  If you have any preferences
for alternate delivery points, please let me know.

As I mentioned, we  have already quoted NYMEX + .055 as the all-in delivered
price to Ormet.

Ormet would like to come to agreement on this transaction today (his wife is
due any day so he will be out of the office starting tomorrow).  They are one
hour ahead of us so your comments are greatly appreciated.

Thank you for all of your help on this deal.

Craig


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
09:32 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/07/2001 09:37 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/7/01


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>
To: "'Rachel McMahon'" <rachel@cleanpower.org>; <blunden@hotmail.com>;
<counihan@greenmountain.com>; <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>;
<dank@environmentaldefense.org>; <rich@ceert.org>;
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>; <jweisgall@aol.com>; <jlevin@ucsusa.org>;
"Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>; <srose@ecovote.org>;
<lnelson@westernrenewables.com>; <hap.boyd@enron.com>;
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>; <emiller@siliconenergy.com>;
<olsendil@concentric.net>; <smitty@greenbuilder.com>; <rachel@rnp.org>;
<taschehoug@mnmethane.com>
Cc: <vjw@ceert.org>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: for Board review and comment

> I can't support the letter and would like to see CEERT abandon this course
> of action.  I believe that there are better ways for CEERT to achieve its
> goal of furthering renewable development, such as supporting a properly
> designed green direct access bill.
> Jack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rachel McMahon [mailto:rachel@cleanpower.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:34 PM
> To: blunden@hotmail.com; counihan@greenmountain.com; rcavanagh@nrdc.org;
> dank@environmentaldefense.org; rich@ceert.org;
> emaddox@seawestwindpower.com; jweisgall@aol.com; jlevin@ucsusa.org;
> jackp@calpine.com; srose@ecovote.org; lnelson@westernrenewables.com;
> hap.boyd@enron.com; steve_ponder@fpl.com; emiller@siliconenergy.com;
> olsendil@concentric.net; smitty@greenbuilder.com; rachel@rnp.org;
> taschehoug@mnmethane.com
> Cc: vjw@ceert.org
> Subject: for Board review and comment
>
>
> From V. John White:
>
> Board Members,
>
> Attached is a letter to the head of the California Department of Water
> Resources (CDWR) regarding the state's power purchase contracts.
>
> The review and comment of the CEERT and Clean Power Campaign Boards is
> welcome and solicited.  Time is of the essence - please respond as soon as
> possible.  We can hold a conference call to discuss, if necessary.
>
> Following Board review, I intend to show this letter to the Governor's
> office before sending it to CDWR.


I am a total procrastinator.

We are leaving for snowy lands this weekend. and as I have never been to Colorado before, it appears that I do not appreciate how cold it is there.  I am looking to borrow appropriate cold weather clothing, women's size 8 or 10, if anyone is willing.  Please let me know ASAP.  Call me at 713-807-7910.

Thanks,

Amy B


Our first flag football game is tonight! Are you in?

Nick Hiemstra
03/27/2000 10:00 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Game Tonight

What game?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           03/27/2000 08:55 AM

To: Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Amir Ahanchian/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Game Tonight

The game is at 8:45 at the Post Oak YMCA.  The Post Oak YMCA is outside the
loop at the corner of San Felipe and Augusta.

We have eight as of now, so make sure and let me know if you can't make it
for any reason.


Jeremy,

I want to move all deals currently in the INTRA-EMWMEH book into the
FT-IM-ENOV book.  Attached is a forwards detail by risk of the deals in
question.  Let me know if you have any further questions.  I need this done
this week if possible.  Thanks.

DG    3-9573


Enron announced today that its common stock will now be traded as an Over-the-Counter (OTC) equity security under the symbol "ENRNQ."  This follows a decision by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to file an application to delist Enron's common stock, which means that Enron's common stock and related securities are suspended from trading on the NYSE.  Enron is considering whether to appeal the NYSE's decision.

The NYSE has standard criteria for listing stocks, which can be found on their website at www.nyse.com.  Enron recently fell below the following listing criteria: average closing price of a security less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period.  Quotation service for Enron's stock will now be provided by the National Quotation Bureau, LLC "Pink Sheets."


I:

Kim Ward in Houston x3-0685 is taking over management of this account.  My
understanding of the new deal is that the fixed price deal expires 12/31 and
Kim has renegotiated the arrangment at index + .05/MMBtu.  Please contact her
to confirm.

Thanks

C

Isabel Y Resendez
01/31/2001 09:09 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECt
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: akzo

Chris,
I am back to this issue.  I have been told that the way we can fix the a/r
issues is to change the way the deal is entered in sitara.  I wanted to make
sure you agree with the change.  The way the deal is entered now is
1,125 daily  and the rest at the NGI index.
The days that Akzo takes less than the 1,125 the volumes allocation changes.
Making the system want to charge them more since it adds more volumes to the
NGI price.

I was wondering if we can change the deal to:
1,125 * #of days in month @ $2.6676
remaning volume  @ $NGI index.
This way it reflex the way ENA has invoice Akzo(since Akzo takes the require
1,125 on a monthly basis.

Please e-mail me back letting me know if this change agrees with how you
wanted Akzo to be invoice and that will reflex how Akzo has been invoice.
thanks
isabel
713-853-0440

---------------------- Forwarded by Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Isabel Y Resendez
10/19/2000 09:40 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: akzo

Good morning Chris,
I have a question on Akzo's invoicing.  Since we invoice Akzo manually I am
trying to reconcile the system with what we have invoice Akzo.
The way we are invoicing them is that we assume that they take the 1125 mmbtu
daily.  However, there is one or two days of each month(almost) that they
take less than the 1125/day.  That changes the numbers.  As it looks I may
have to go back and do PMA invoices to invoice them balance.  I wanted to
speak with you on this before I actually do anything.  Here is an example:

August manual invoice:
34,875 @ 2.6676 =  $93,032.55
24,520 @ 4.4775 =  $109,790.09
Total        $202,822.64

System Invoice:
34,633  @  2.6676  = $92,386.99
24,762  @   4.4775=   $110,871.86
Total          $203,258.85

Difference         $436.21
The reason to the difference in volume is that on 8/8 only 883 mmtu flowed.

The balance is not a big one but it is over my limit to overwrite.
My questions is do you want me to go back and send Akzo PMA invoices???
Give me a call if you need to speak to me about this.
thanks
isabel


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.


Lee:
Check the PUC website for information---it sounds like the PUC's inquiry into
the adequacy of SoCal's insfrastructure, i.e., in state transportation.
Should be a lot about it on their website (www.cpuc.ca.gov).  If you come up
empty, leave me a voicemail (415.782.7822) and I'll track things down.

Best,
Jeff

	Lee Huber
	06/06/2001 11:11 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CPUC

All I know is as follows    On March 27,2001 the Commission issued a scoping
memo in 00-11-002.  The scoping memo added the issue of the adequacy of
SoCal's transmission system to the issues to be addressed in this proceeding.

An ALJ ruling dated April 26,2001, provided that the adequacy of SoCal's gas
transmission system and the effect on its customers be bifurcated from the
other issues in this proceeding.  The ALJ's ruling provided that any party
filing testimony on March 23,2001 would be allowed to file supplemental
testimony on the SoCal capacity issue.

SoCal filed supplemental testimony.

We are not a party. We need to know if it is too late to become a party, if
we wanted to. Also was any other supplemental testimony filed by other
parties??


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz@ENRON
02/12/2001 11:49 AM
To: Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA - West Gas Orig

Edie, Darren, further to our conversation.  The only reporting that I would
like to send upstairs is broken down into two categories.  West Gas Trading,
and West Gas Origination.  All orig ( even Denver ) is coded to 107321.
Inside of west gas orig we have created a tracking mechanism through Darren,
that provides a seperate report broken down by individual or group but I am
the only person who needs this data for right now.

Edie, please ensure that on a go forward basis that the actualized income
streams have been coded in the proper places and that we do not double count
again.

Call if any questions.

BT


What do you think of Boogie Woogies? If not there, someplace relatively close
would work--Rock Bottom, Fernando's, etc. Let me know!

To: Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tonight

You betcha,  I get off around 5:30-5:45 where were you thinking.


FYI,  I will be leaving at 3:45  tomorrow  for a doctors appointment.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Teco Tap  10.938 / Enron


Jan:  Thanks for your note.  Tim Belden has asked Dana to book a conference
room - maybe you can coordinate with her.  It might also be nice if there is
a spare office or two that could be booked for the day (including the
morning) so we will have a place to work when not in the meetings.  The only
people I know of coming from out of town will be me and Ken Raisler, a lawyer
with Sullivan & Cromwell in New York.  We will have a better idea of any
audio-visual equipment we need as we get closer to the meeting date.

JAN M
KING
02/09/2000 12:30 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Visit to Portland - March 6

Mark:  If there is anything you need in the way of facilities for this
meeting, please let me know.  I would be happy to assist.


Sounds great--I'll coordinate with Shirley.  Jacob was very excited about his prior meeting with you and the group.

Molly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Magee, Molly
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince; Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Hello

Molly,

Kim Watson would like us to bring Jacob for another interview.
We can do it later this week.

Vince

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:22 PM ---------------------------
From:	Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 09:17 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	RE: Hello

Hi Vince,

If you are still interested in bringing back this gentleman back for another interview, I would very much like to meet with him.  Sean talked with him when you brought him in a few weeks ago and he thought it would be a good idea for me to meet with him so we can compare thoughts.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince
Sent:	Monday, April 16, 2001 1:21 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni; Kaminski, Vince
Subject:	Re: Hello

Kim,

This is a letter from one of the job applicants who works for PROS.
It seems that the system they develop for Williams
is more a scheduling system.

Would you like to ask him to come back for another interview,
to get more information out of him?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 01:18 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
"Jacob Y. Kang" <jacobyk@yahoo.com> on 04/11/2001 11:18:44 PM
To:	Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Re: Hello

Dear Vince:

It was so nice meeting and talking with you too. I did
not take any pen back, I lost my pen too somewhere in
Enron.

As I mentioned to you, after I got my Ph.D in 1999, I
have been working two years as Lead Scientist and
Science Manager in energy division at PROS Revenue
Management Inc. in Houston.

I developed and implemented the mathematical models
for Trading Optimization System and Firm
Transportation Optimization System.

The Trading Optimization System becomes the most
popular product in the industry this year. Duke Energy
just signed the contract to buy this product
yesterday.  Conoco and Williams also signed the
contracts for it. According to PROS Sales Department,
the potential marketer to buy this product exceeds 15
companies in one or two years.

Enron is the ideal place for me to continue my
research and system developing efforts to combine
revenue management with risk management. I am
confident that I can make significant contributions to
Enron in this area.

I would like to thank you again for giving me this
opportunity to come to Enron for this interview. I am
looking forward to having the opportunity to work in
Enron.

Sincerely Yours

Jacob

--- Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> Jacob,
>
> It was nice meeting you. Did take by any chance
> my pen? If not, I apologize.
>
> Vince
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Hey,
Surprised to hear from you.  jeff is in charge of nat gas operations and reports to sally beck who is in charge of all back office ops.  as of this morn, he is still here.   i've heard some wacky enron rumors before but this one is pretty good.  where'd you hear this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robertson, Heather" <HRobertson@cloughcapital.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Robertson+2C+20Heather+22+20+3CHRobertson+40cloughcapital+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	Hello!

> How are ya?!
>
> Question:  ever hear of a guy named Jeff Gossett (sp?) at Enron?  Supposed
> to be high up, but quit two weeks ago?  Maybe even reported to Skilling?
> Lemme know what you know...
>
> We should catch up, eh?  =)
>
>
> Heather Lockhart Robertson
> Clough Capital Partners, LP
> 260 Franklin Street
> Boston, MA  02110
> P: 617-204-3409
> F: 617-204-3434
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
02:39 PM ---------------------------

Angela Barnett <angieb46@yahoo.com> on 10/16/2000 10:13:38 PM
To: lsharis@msn.com, kttn0965@aol.com, Topey0661@aol.com,
kkjohnson@velocityexp.com, lpepple@patriothomes.com, Mok66@aol.com,
judy.hernandez@enron.com, nikki.johnson@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Mean Momsannefanny]

--- Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net> wrote:
> Date: 16 Oct 00 16:40:31 PDT
> From: Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net>
> To: Angie Barnett <angieb46@yahoo.com>, Pam Buesking
> <pbuesking@juno.com>,
>   Carol Denton <cdentonjhs@netscape.net>, Karla
> Funnell <jimmie4ever@aol.com>,
>   Donna Hixon <dhixonhhe@netscape.net>,
>   Laurie Pepple <LPepple@patriothomes.com>, Debbie
> Perry <ncc2103@aol.com>,
>   Kim Rathka <mykim2u@aol.com>, Traci Rininger
> <tlr_je@hotmail.com>,
>   Jan Secor <JCsdaughter19@cs.com>,
>   Marcia Tuskey <NDFan-Ref@worldnet.att.net>,
> <Geobethkal@aol.com>,
>   <bmetcalf863@earthlink.net>,
> <boysthree@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Mean Momsannefanny]
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account
> today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822 name=Forwarded
Message
> From: "Laurie Lauer" <jakenlaneysmom@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Mean Momsannefanny
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 22:31:50 EST
>
> Many of you have seen this before- but I just LOVE
> it - It is hard being a
> mean MOM!!!  Laurie
>
>
> >From: JBD3@webtv.net (JENNIFER STICKLER)
> >To: DSTICKLER3@AOL.COM, THI6771985@AOL.COM,
> DMCMILLE@IUSB.EDU,
> >JAKENLANEYSMOM@HOTMAIL.COM, GLORRIE2@MSN.COM,
> PBOEPPLE@AOL.COM
> >Subject: Fwd: Mean Momsannefanny
> >Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own
> public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2.2 message/rfc822
> From: Annefanny1@aol.com
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:40:43 EDT
> Subject: Fwd: Mean Momsannefanny
> To: JBD3@webtv.net
>
>
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2.2.2 message/rfc822
> From: "Lisiewski, Joyce (x220)"
> <jlisiewski@jcfcleve.org>
> To: "Witriol, Phyllis (x227)"
> <pwitriol@jcfcleve.org>,
>         "Roth, Lacey J. (x325)"
> <lroth@jcfcleve.org>,
>         "Miller, Sylvia (x210)"
>   <smiller@jcfcleve.org>,
>         "'Ann Lewis'" <annefanny1@aol.com>,
> "'Brett'"
>   <brettwarden@aol.com>,
>         "'Chris Fallon'"
> <nightwolf1376@hotmail.com>,
>         "'dirtclay22_2000@yahoo.com'"
> <dirtclay22_2000@yahoo.com>,
>         "'Elena Rosin'"
>   <elena@bigpond.net.au>,
>         "'Michele Winter'"
> <MICHELEANDSCOTT@email.msn.com>,
>         "'Monika Flom'" <moni_flom@hotmail.com>,
>         "'Pam Oakes'" <poakes@hahnlaw.com>,
>         "'PHDWILDCAT@aol.com'" <PHDWILDCAT@aol.com>,
>         "'Wilkins, Adrienne L (CLEVELAND CL 646)'"
> <AWilkins@pclient.ml.com>
> Subject: Mean Moms
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:17:22 -0400
>
>
> > Mean Moms
> > I loved you enough . . . .
> >
> > Someday when my children are old enough to
> understand the logic that
> > motivates a parent, I will tell them:
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to ask where you were
> going, with whom, and what
> > time you would be home.
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to insist that you save
> your money and buy a bike
> > for yourself even though we could afford to buy
> one for you.
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to be silent and let you
> discover that your new
> > best friend was a creep.
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to make you go pay for
> the bubble gum you had
> > taken and tell the clerk, "I stole this yesterday
> and want to pay for it."
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to stand over you for two
> hours while you
> > cleaned your room, a job that should have taken 15
> minutes.
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to let you see anger,
> disappointment, and tears
> > in my eyes.
> >
> > Children must learn that their parents aren't
> perfect.
> >
> > I loved you enough . . . to let you assume the
> responsibility for your
> > actions even when the penalties were so harsh they
> almost broke my heart.
> >
> > But most of all, I loved you enough . . . to say
> NO when I knew you would
> > hate me for it.
> >
> > Those were the most difficult battles of all.  I'm
> glad I 'won' them,
> > because in the end you won, too.
> >
> > And someday when your children are old enough to
> understand the logic that
> > motivates parents, you will tell them . . . .
> >
> > Was your Mom mean?  I know mine was.
> >
> > We had the meanest mother in the whole world!
> >
> > While other kids ate candy for breakfast, we had
> to have cereal, eggs,
> > and toast.
> >
> > When others had a Pepsi and a Twinkie for lunch,
> we had to eat
> > sandwiches.
> >
> > And you can guess our mother fixed us a dinner
> that was different from
> > what other kids had, too.
> >
> > Mother insisted on knowing where we were at all
> times.  You'd think we
> were
> > convicts in a prison.
> >
> > She had to know who our friends were, and what we
> were doing with them.
> >
> > She insisted that if we said we would be gone for
> an hour, we would be
> gone
> > for an hour or less.
> >
> > We were ashamed to admit it, but she had the nerve
> to break the Child
> Labor
> > Laws by making us work.
> >
> > We had to wash the dishes, make the beds, learn to
> cook, vacuum the
> > floor, do laundry, empty the trash and all sorts
> of cruel jobs.
> >
> > I think she would lie awake at night thinking of
> more things for us to
> > do.
> >
> > She always insisted on us telling the truth, the
> whole truth, and nothing
> > but the truth.
> >
> > By the time we were teenagers, she could read our
> minds.  Then, life was
> > really tough!
> >
> > Mother wouldn't let our friends just honk the horn
> when they drove up.
> > They had to come up to the door so she could meet
> them.  While everyone
> > else
> > could date when they were 12 or 13, we had to wait
> until we were 16.
> >
> > Because of our mother we missed out on lots of
> things other kids
> > experienced. None of us have ever been caught
> shoplifting, vandalizing
> > other's property or ever arrested for any crime.
> It was all her fault.
> >
> > Now that we have left home, we are all educated,
> honest adults.
> > We are doing our best to be mean parents just like
> Mom was.
> >
> > I think that is what's wrong with the world today.
> >
> > It just doesn't have enough mean moms.
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Crystal Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/29/2000 09:45 PM ---------------------------

Veronica Perez@ENRON
11/29/2000 09:14 AM
To: Crystal Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sarah Reyna@ECT,
Grisela Escamilla/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Escamilla@Enron, Anabel
Gutierrez@ECT, Luly Stephens/NA/Enron@Enron, Yvette Pinero/NA/Enron@Enron,
Flavia Negrete/NA/Enron@Enron, olivia.herrera@weatherford.com,
lindaloz3@aol.com
cc:

Subject: FW: JESUS

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Perez/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Linda Escamilla
11/29/2000 08:34 AM
To: cantu@storge.fm.bcm.tmc.edu, yanezee@texaco.com,
escamilc@spring-branch.isd.tenet.edu, Laura.Gutierrez@enron.com,
alex.hidalgo@solvay.com, Dbarn70@gateway.net, tommymarcos@mail.cotas.com.bo,
ElisaM@senterra.com, Veronica Perez/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dawn.Rudewig@HALLIBURTON.com
cc:

Subject: FW: JESUS

______________________________________________________________________
___
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - Jesus1.pps


attached is a quick cut at the 2001 Budget adjustments for HPL.

Total Budget for 2001 was $6.2.  Saving for the remainder of year assume
sale completes by June 1 could be a possible $2.6.

This is just based upon Headcount reduction.

Let me know what you think/

thanks

bob

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           01/22/2001 01:59 PM

To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 2001 Anticipated Budget Adjustments for HPL Sale

During the budgeting process for 2001 I gave Dave Delainey an estimated cost
savings for Energy Operations assuming the sale of HPL. Since this is clearly
on the horizon, we need to take a close look at opportunities for cost
savings and our estimated timing on those savings.  I will ask James by copy
of this memo to set up a meeting late this week to cover this.  I want to be
able to get back with Dave with more detailed estimates of cost savings.


just to call you later in case it rains to see if we're still going out to
memorial park.  I wouldn't even mind just going to the Y or something and
throwing on one of the basketball courts that are open.

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           11/13/2000 02:31 PM

To: Luis Mena/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

713-628-3104  - why?

Luis Mena@ENRON
11/13/2000 02:23 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

What's your celly-cell number?


The governor thinks the state can require wholesale rebates
-- Forwarded Message --

>Energy rate relief bill gets
>OK
>State Senate passes
>rollback; legislation to go to
>Assembly
>By Ed Mendel
>STAFF WRITER
>August 11, 2000
>
>SACRAMENTO -- The state
>Senate approved legislation
>yesterday that would cut
>San Diego's soaring electric
>bills by half and could credit
>consumers for excess rates
>paid since June 1.
>The measure, if passed by
>the Assembly and signed by
>the governor, would reduce
>bills to the level San Diego
>Gas & Electric Co. customers
>were paying in July 1999.
>While customer payments
>would be cut in half,
>however, SDG&E ratepayers
>could be liable in several
>years for the balance.
>The credit to consumers
>would hinge on a finding of
>improper overcharges by
>power companies.
>The
>rollback-and-reimbursement
>measure -- carried by two
>San Diego Democrats, Sen.
>Dede Alpert and
>Assemblywoman Susan Davis
>-- sailed out of the Senate
>with support from 24
>Democrats and four
>Republicans.
>All three of the Republicans
>who represent parts of San
>Diego County voted for the
>bill. The 27th vote needed
>for two-thirds approval of
>the urgency measure came
>from Sen. Bill Morrow,
>R-Oceanside.
>"We have a dysfunctional
>market that is not working
>and has been just so
>incredibly painful for the
>people I represent," Alpert
>told the Senate. "We need
>your help. We need it now."
>San Diego is the first area of
>the state fully affected by
>deregulation legislation
>enacted four years ago. But
>other areas will be
>deregulated within two
>years, and legislators do not
>want soaring rates in their
>districts.
>A vote on the Alpert-Davis
>bill in the Assembly was
>delayed for at least a week
>because of potential
>opposition from Republicans.
>Gov. Gray Davis, who is
>proposing a similar reduction
>that would not be
>retroactive to June 1, has
>taken no position on the bill.
>"It's important to keep this
>bill moving along," said
>Morrow, who said he
>struggled with the vote
>because the bill does nothing
>to speed up the construction
>of new power plants.
>The bill, AB 2290, would cut
>rates to the July 1, 1999,
>level and make the reduction
>retroactive to June 1 of this
>year. State and federal
>regulatory agencies would
>be asked to determine if San
>Diego ratepayers have been
>improperly overcharged.
>In the years ahead, San
>Diego ratepayers could be
>reimbursed for high rates
>paid this summer through a
>credit that would lower their
>monthly bills -- but only if
>the investigation finds an
>improper overcharge and
>that repayment can be
>collected from those
>responsible.
>Alpert said the cost of the
>credit could be born by
>energy generators for
>overcharging, SDG&E for
>failing to make cheaper
>energy purchases, and the
>state and federal
>government for not
>protecting ratepayers.
>"I don't think anybody
>believes anybody is going to
>be 100 percent responsible
>for this," Alpert said.
>The governor Wednesday
>asked the Public Utilities
>Commission to meet Aug. 21
>and reduce rates for SDG&E
>customers by half, dropping
>a typical residential bill from
>the current level of $120 a
>month to $65.
>The governor's plan is similar
>to the Alpert-Davis bill, but
>it's not retroactive to June 1
>and would take effect this
>month. Critics of the
>governor's plan doubt that
>an investigation will result in
>the recovery of an
>overcharge from
>generators, marketers or
>SDG&E.
>Nettie Hoge, executive
>director of The Utility
>Reform Network, said that
>what Davis has proposed is
>likely to be not a true rate
>reduction, but simply a plan
>to spread the payment of
>high rates over several
>years.
>"San Diegans can't afford a
>pay now and pay later
>scheme," Hoge said. "They
>are in the midst of an
>economic and public health
>crisis."
>The Alpert-Davis bill needs
>at least six Republican votes
>for approval in the
>Assembly. Alpert said two
>Assembly Re


yo, i'm still coming.  saturday would be great.  I'm in the city all day and
night, and the only plans i have are to go to the game sat.  I'll call you
when i get a chance.  My cell phone is 832-444-7702.

Looking forward to seeing you.

mat

Andrew Brief <andybrief@yahoo.com> on 03/08/2001 08:12:46 AM
To: Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Hey

stud-

when are you coming?

sadly, i have  abig work weekend, but we can maneuver
around it. i am on call friday and sunday. am off all
day saturday and would love to meet out saturday night
(after your game--nig east tourney, i assume). make
sure to call me asap.

646-935-9340

page 917-389-3882

brief
--- Matt.Smith@enron.com wrote:
>
> I should be good for a place to say, but I certainly
> appreciate the offer.
> I'm definitely still coming, though.
> Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, tell
> me when you're free, and we'll hang out.  You and
> Jess up for dinner?
> Right now, saturday night is the only night I have
> plans (basketball game).
> I'll be going out afterwards, though.  Just let me
> know.
>
> Later.
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


that is classy


Additional Information for Security Resource Request  EMLN-4RWQS7 has been
provided by Security.

To view the request, double click your left mouse button on the Notes
document link below.