A few updates, clarifications and suggestions:
To be clear, the Group of Ministers has not approved any specific draft.
They deliberated on various concepts, which approved concepts have been
incorporated into the NCAER Draft VII.
It is our understanding that, just prior to his hospitalization, the late
Minister instructed his Ministry to support the NCAER draft.
The Prime Minister has assumed the role of Minister of Power until a
successor to Mr. Kumaramangalam has been appointed.  I'm sure you are aware
of the dynamic role the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) has played in the
telecommunications reform in India.  The same kind of dynamic role should be
played by the PMO in power reforms.
Mr. N.K. Singh is the Secretary to the Minister and was the person who
actively worked on the telecommunication reforms.  If the Secretary of Energy
has an opportunity to indicate to Mr. Singh (and certainly the Prime Minister
if possible) the need for the Prime Minister's Office to become active in
promoting power reforms and the advisability and need to support Draft VII of
the Electricity Bill, it would be most helpful.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/11/2000 09:52 AM ---------------------------

Jane Wilson
09/10/2000 12:01 PM
To: David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov
cc: Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hillings@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Neil
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear David,

I'm so glad you asked for an update!

We have indeed had an interesting development regarding the Electricity Bill
since your visit.  You will recall that in AMCHAM's briefing, it was
positively noted that the drafting process of the Electricity Bill had been
transparent and that a draft that would provide a blueprint for the
restructuring of the electricity sector to move toward competitive markets
was attained.  Noone was 100 percent satisfied (probably the mark of a good,
passable bill) but many  agreed to the draft and felt, while not perfect, it
would achieve the desired reform.

We have learned that there are actually two drafts of the Electricity Bill
sponsored by the Ministry of Power.  The first has been developed by NCAER
(NCAER draft) in a very transparent process with seven iterations and
comments from 190 parties.  NCAER was hired as a consultant for this purpose
by the Ministry of Power.  At the time of Draft III, a second draft (MoP
draft) was developed in the Ministry which subsequently incorporated some but
not all of the NCAER draft provisions negotiated in the transparent process.
It was the MoP draft that was sent to the Group of Ministers and has been
worked on by the Ministry of Law.

The draft, however, was never introduced in Parliament.  The industry
discovered the existence of the second MoP draft immediately prior to
Minister Kumaramangalam's hospitalization and lobbied him and Secretary Basu
heavily to introduce the NCAER draft in Parliament or, at a minimum, allow a
transparent commenting process on the MoP draft.

Several parties in the industry have now been given the MoP draft, and
Secretary Basu has said he would entertain comments.  (How widely it has been
distributed is unknown.)  In addition, the death of the Minister, who was a
staunch advocate of reform, and the lack of a named successor, has now left
things somewhat uncertain.

The issues as they now stand are:

The existence of two separate Ministry-sponsored drafts, only one of which
was subjected to a wide sector review process.
The need to use the product of a transparent, commenting process once it has
been formulated.
The fact that the fine-tuned balance of interests and clear blueprint for a
transition to competitive markets achieved by the NCAER draft has been lost
in the MoP draft.  For example, the clear deregulation of price provisions in
the tariff section have been removed so that there is, in the MoP draft, full
regulation of price by the state commissions; however, in the state
commission section, there is a provision that allows the State Commission to
permit access to a consumer class and only determine the wheeling charge
(rather than the wheeling and supply price) for that class when it has so
determined.   Thus, there is  an apparent conflict within the statute
regarding the regulation of commodity priceand uncertainty regarding access
to end users.  (There are many such examples.)

Action Item:  Either support the NCAER draft and send it to the Ministry of
Law for legal fine tuning (Basu mentioned that the "form" of the NCAER draft
was not right), or repeat the iterative, transparent commenting process with
regard to the MoP draft.  hWe recommend supporting the NCAER draft because it
reflects a balance of the multiple sector interests.  It is the first such
document produced through an open process in India and was a process
sponsored by the Ministry -- for that reason alone, the Ministry should
promote and support the NCAER version.

Any assistance you can render on this issue will be greatly appreciated by
many parties in the sector.  Let us know how it goes.

Sincerely,
Jane Wilson

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/09/2000 07:51 PM ---------------------------

"Pumphrey, David" <David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov> on 09/09/2000 03:36:09 AM
To: "'sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com'" <sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com>,
"'jane.wilson@enron.com'" <jane.wilson@enron.com>
cc: "Cutler, Thomas" <Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov>

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear Sanjay and Jane,

I wanted to again thank you for the briefings you provided during my recent
visit to India.  Your analysis of developments in the electricity sector were
very helpful.

As you know we are getting ready for the visit of the Prime Minister next
week.  We have several energy events related to the visit and hope to be able
to complete some of the "homework" that you assigned.  It would be
particularly helpful if you could provide any updates on the status of the
Electricity bill.  I understand that the Council of Ministers had approved it
but I don't know if progress has been made in the Parliament.  Also there was
a report that some aspects of the bill had been changed in the approval
process.  Any updates would be useful for us in preparing for our meetings
with Secretary Basu and the Prime Minister.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

David Pumphrey
Department of Energy


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 09:48 AM -----

	"H. Andrew Schwed" <Andrew.Schwed@morganstanley.com>
	05/22/2001 10:22 AM
	Please respond to Andrew.Schwed

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: assignment agreement

Sara,

    I have amended the agreement.  I don't see the details of Annex A, but I
usually don't check that over
anyway.

Thanks,
Andrew

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> Thanks for the email.
>
> I now have my facts straight.  The account is currently in the name of "ECT
> Investments, Inc." (and not Enron North America Corp.).  The specific ECT
> Investments, Inc. account at Morgan Stanley that is being transferred is:
> 038-08826-6 (which is the credit book).
>
> I thought you would want to modify the assignment agreement since it is
> your agreement.  I also wanted to be certain that the Annex A description
> is sufficient for you.
>
> Please call if you have any questions.  Thanks.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com
>
>
>                     "H. Andrew Schwed"
>                     <Andrew.Schwed@morganst        To:
sara.shackleton@enron.com
>                     anley.com>                     cc:     Ketan Parekh
<Ketan.Parekh@morganstanley.com>
>                                                    Subject:     assignment
agreement
>                     05/21/2001 03:54 PM
>                     Please respond to
>                     Andrew.Schwed
>
>
>
> Sara,
>
>     Attached is the amended agreement.  Please call me with any
> questions.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew Schwed
>
> (See attached file: Enron Assignment.doc)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                   Name: Enron Assignment.doc
>    Enron Assignment.doc           Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                               Encoding: base64
>                        Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 - Enron Assignment.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
03/12/2001 01:25 PM
To: ludkam@aol.com
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vince's Itinerary - Wednesday, 3/14/01

Hello Ludmilla:

Attached is Vince's itinerary for his Wednesday trip to California.


Here's the service list
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/06/2000
03:40 PM ---------------------------

DENISE LAGESSE
11/06/2000 03:38 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: service list

Here it is.  It also includes Naomi's name/address.


Dear Mark:

I spoke with Janie Bonnard and Jeanette Elbertson concerning a possible
opening for a Legal Specialist within your group and Jeanette asked that I
forward my resume to you.

During my years at Enron, I worked closely with Anthony Duenner on the
Portland General Merger while I was still with Vinson & Elkins (1996-1997)
and then joined  Enron in 1997 after 14 years with Vinson and Elkins. I
continued to work with Anthony Duenner (1997-2000) in South America and East
Asia.  After a reorganization, I joined the CALME Region at the end of April
2000, as a Manager, and reported to Shawn Cumberland, President and COO for
the Region.

Again, I find myself in the middle of another reorganization, and would be
very interested in discussing a  position in your group, should one be
available.  I can be reached at  X 6-7687,

Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly yours,

Peggy Sichenze


What's going on?  Are you busy?  I'm going to try to get out of here early
again today.  If there's any chance you can get away by 5 let me know and
I'll hang out.

RR


Lillian, please see the attached authorization memo.  It is still in draft
form, but since time is of the essence, Geneva advised me to forward it to
you now so that you could start working on it.  We would like to have the new
company formed today if possible.  I will let you know if I make any changes
to the attached.  In the meantime, please do not hesitate to call if you have
questions.

Susan Scott
x30596


you alive?


Steve,

Please see attached a background note and update relating to the LME fine
issued to Enron Metals.  Please let me know if you have any questions, or
would like any further information on this.

Regards

Julie Green


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY PM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

AFTERNOON HIGHLIGHTS:

ANTITRUST: Supporters and opponents of the antitrust case against Microsoft
released dueling white papers in anticipation of an appeals-court ruling.

PRIVACY: Business and government officials aired an array of privacy concerns.

BUSINESS: Panelists cited the impact of the Internet as a leading reason
for securities' law reform.

E-COMMERCE: A lawyers' panel discussed the prospects for creating a
"trustmark" for e-commerce disputes.

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
International Roundup: Staff Writer Maureen Sirhal looks at the top
high-tech policy news from around the globe.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/international/internatarc
hive2001.htm

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- Insider Interview: Making Sense Of The Faith-Based Initiative
http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/05/0530insider.htm

-- On The Trail: Does The GOP Have Bigger Problems Than Jeffords?
http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/trail.htm

******************************************************
CAPITAL CAREER SOURCE TOP JOBS -- week of 5/28/01
Jeffords switches parties -- Is it time to switch jobs?

1. Cmte for Economic Devt - Pub Affairs Manager
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E70TKRPV
2. Natl Senior Citizens Law Center - Executive Director
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E70YLGZ4
3. NFIB - Asst Dir of Media Communication
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E80KXY4S

For more jobs, go to http://www.capitalcareersource.com
******************************************************

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Bill, you will need to go into your profile in XMS and put me as your assistant in order for me to process your expense reports.  If you aren't sure how to do it, I can do it for you, but I will need your P00# and your password.

Emily Sellers
Enron Transportation Services Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB4771
Houston, Tx 77001713) 853-7172
(713) 646-2738

emily.sellers@enron.com <mailto:esellers@enron.com>


In preparing for our meeting with Exxon, I have hit a dead end with regards
to the "Agreement"  he cites in his fax to us.  I have searched and others as
well to no avail.    Therefore,  would you ask Jacobson to fax  you/me  the
entire agreement he is referring too because it does not exist in our world.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Armin Rest
5003 15th NE 306
Seattle, WA 98105
resta@u.washington.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Armin Rest


thanks again

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	RE: MARCH 3

I can. Let me just tie up a couple El Paso discrepancies for the last few days, and I'll let you know ASAP.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Symes, Kate
Cc:	Thompson, Virginia
Subject:	MARCH 3

Kate,

Can you tell me if there was a real-time cut with PGE  on this day on peak?

thanks

diana


Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded43.pdf


Hey, do me a favor and only send this stuff to the house email (jhyatt@msn.com).  Hope you and the family are doing OK.
Luv
k

-----Original Message-----
From: Tina Leavy [mailto:tina_leavy@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:41 PM
To: DALBRITTON@cox.rr.com; rda2c@unix.mail.virginia.edu;
Bandrews257@aol.com; maanbr@hotmail.com; KCARRLCSW@AOL.COM;
elena_carver@yahoo.com; sjplus5@hotmail.com; sweetie05291983@msn.com;
Kravenoriole5610@msn.com; MDOCKENS79@MSN.COM; NNCYMorgan@msn.com;
M011602@YAHOO.COM; apdiving@aol.com; fowlerj_23102@msn.com;
resqdisp@yahoo.com
Cc: cardiac696@aol.com; EMT607@aol.com; Misnic20@yahoo.com;
vamtblues@aol.com; jhyatt@msn.com; Hyatt, Kevin; ntisti95@aol.com;
ellen@pwarc.org; Leavylaw@aol.com; Leavys@msn.com; tammy_Leavy@msn.com;
Jsay251425@aol.com; cmarsh3892@aol.com; medic_99us@yahoo.com;
belmontrm2@juno.com
Subject: Fwd: Nine months later

>From: Cardiac696@aol.com
>To: H20MLNCRWL@aol.com, Cardiac734@aol.com, found1@earthlink.net,
>Iwannatlk@aol.com, Pita651@aol.com, neldavis@juno.com,
>Mikedeni@aol.com, firefighter@va.prestige.net, Resdive626@hotmail.com,
>   UJSDNTNO@aol.com, EMT607@aol.com, Chrisdfiredog@aol.com,
>Laubertimes5@cs.com, Tina_Leavy@msn.com, CMarsh3892@aol.com,
>Emsequalnolife@aol.com, MWCMANDIE@aol.com, Jwalsh@medicorpihn.com
>Subject: Nine months later
>Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:21:38 EST
>
>
> >  Nine months later...
> >
> >  Jack decided to go skiing with his buddy, Bob.
> > They loaded up Jack's minivan and headed north.
> >  After driving for a few hours, they got caught in a
> >  terrible blizzard.
> >
> >  They pulled into a nearby farm and asked the attractive
> >  lady who answered the door if they could spend the night.
> >  "I realize it's terrible weather out there and I have this
> >  huge house all to myself, but I'm recently "widowed,"
> >  she explained. "I'm afraid the neighbors will talk if I let
> >  you stay in my  house."
> >  "Don't worry," Jack said. "We'll be happy to sleep in the barn.
> >  And if the weather breaks, we'll be gone at first light."
> > The lady agreed, and the two men found their way to the barn
> >  and settled in for the night. Come morning, the weather had
> >  cleared, and they got on their way, enjoying a great weekend
> >  of skiing.
> >
> > About nine months later, Jack received a letter from an
> >  attorney. It took him a few minutes to figure it out, but he
> >  finally determined that it was from the attorney of that
> > attractive widow he had met on the ski weekend.
> >  He dropped in on his friend Bob and asked, "Bob, do you remember
> >  that good looking widow woman that let us sleep in her barn on
> > our ski trip up North?"
> > "Yes, I do."
> >  "Did you happen to get up in the middle of the night, go up to the
> >  house and pay her a visit?"
> >  "Yes," Bob said, a little embarrassed about being found out.
> >  "I have to admit that I did."
> > "And did you happen to use my name instead of telling her your
> >  name?"
> >  Bob's face turned red and he said, "Yeah, sorry, buddy. I'm afraid
> >  I did. Why do you ask?"
> > ..
>..
>.......
>......
>......
>......
>.......
>........
> > > > >   > "She just died and left me everything."
> >  (And you thought the ending would be different, didn't you?)
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042314.txt


Tanya,

Here it is.

Ludmila Kaminski
Escondido Village, 32B
Stanford University, CA 94305

Phone: (650) 497 6938
       (650) 465 9415 (cell)

Vince

Tanya Tamarchenko
10/13/2000 09:12 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: your wife's coordinates in Stanford

Vince,
I am looking forward to meet your wife and son in Stanford.
Would you send me their coordinates?

Tanya.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000 08:02
AM ---------------------------

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 07/27/2000 01:23:16 PM
To: "'cgerman@enron.com'" <cgerman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Bored Meeting

This one's cute.??? ii

 <<BORED MEETING.EXE>>

 - BORED MEETING.EXE


Get ready.  Beginning in November, electronic pay stubs will be available to all employees who have their paychecks direct deposited into their bank account.  Electronic pay stubs are an easy, fast, and efficient way for you to get your payroll information.  They will also help Enron to realize a considerable savings in time and dollars spent over traditional printed pay stubs.

If you prefer to receive a hardcopy of your pay stub, click on the link below to complete a request form.  This form must be submitted to Payroll by October 15, 2001.  Unless you submit a form your pay stub information will default to electronic viewing.

Please click on the link below.

Name:             TANA JONES
Personnel number: P00502659
Phone:            7138533399

If you have questions about electronic pay stubs, please contact Janice Priddy (Payroll) 713-853-7839 or Marie Newhouse (ClickAtHome) at 713-345-4185 or send an email to  Enron.Payroll@enron.com (Enron Payroll in Outlook).

Stay tuned for more details in the coming weeks.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0810709/i.asp?r=20461&s=WVBUTONU&l=9


Dan, Joe and Charles:  Let's meet in the hallway 15 minutes before to discuss
strategy.  Joe, we can share a cab.  thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
03:26 PM ---------------------------

"Van Way, Cathy" <Cathy.VanWay@mail.house.gov> on 07/21/2000 02:58:23 PM
To: "Black, Andy" <andy.black@mail.house.gov>, "'Betsy Moler'"
<Elizabeth.Moler@ucm.com>, "'Bill Moore'" <bmoore@worsham.net>, "Bolster,
Bob" <Bob.Bolster@mail.house.gov>, "'Bob Nordhaus'" <rrn@vnf.com>, "'Bud
Albright'" <Bud_Albright@reliantenergy.com>, "'Cal Odom'" <codom@eei.org>,
"'Chris Giblin'" <chris_m_giblin@reliantenergy.com>, "'Chuck Gray'"
<cgray@naruc.org>, "'Cindy Bogorad'" <BogoradC@spiegelmcd.com>, "'Cindy
Marlette'" <Cynthia.Marlette@FERC.FED.US>, "Hagerty, Curry"
<Curry.Hagerty@mail.house.gov>, "'Cynthia Sandherr'"
<Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>, "'Gene Peters'" <gpeters@epsa.org>, "Stansell,
Heather" <Heather.Stansell@mail.house.gov>, "'Jane Cirrincione (APPA)'"
<jcirrincione@appanet.org>, "Bentley, Jason" <Jason.Bentley@mail.house.gov>,
"'Jeanne Wolak'" <jhwolak@southernco.com>, "Kelliher, Joe"
<Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov>, "'Joe Nipper'" <jnipper@appanet.org>, "'John
Ryan'" <jryan@mayor.lacity.org>, "'Kathryn Steckelberg'"
<KSteckelberg@eei.org>, "'Kerrill Scrivner'" <kscrivner@txu.com>, "'Marc
Yacker'" <myacker@elcon.org>, "'Marty Kanner'" <mkanner@kannerandassoc.com>,
"Willis, Mike" <Mike.Willis@mail.house.gov>, "Erickson, Miriam"
<Miriam.Erickson@mail.house.gov>, "'Montee Wynn'" <montee.wynn@nreca.org>,
"Betfarhad, Ramsen" <Ramsen.Betfarhad@mail.house.gov>, "'Randy Davis'"
<rdavis@sdsatty.com>, "'Renee Eastman'" <creastma@srp.gov>, "'Rich Glick'"
<richard.glick@hq.doe.gov>, "Waguespack, Stephen"
<Stephen.Waguespack@mail.house.gov>, "'Tom Bonner'" <TDBonner@midamerican.com>
cc:

Subject: Moday meeting

We have reserved 2218 Rayburn for the group to meet on Monday at 8 am to
discuss the various proposals that have been offered.  Attached is a
proposal that has been circulating among some of you to address the State
role in unbundling.  Also attached is a modification of the market power
language discussed yesterday.

 <<stateamend.wpd>>  <<marketpower.wpd>>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Black, Andy
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:31 PM
To: Van Way, Cathy
Subject: Meeting Monday 8a

We have decided to conduct the next meeting Monday at 8a.  Room will be
announced.  Please get any proposals in to my email by Friday 11a.  Thanks
>

 - stateamend.wpd
 - marketpower.wpd


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

Jane S Saladino
08/28/2000 11:49 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

Darron, I believe you were ask about this last month.  it is still causing a
pricing difference this month too.  Please call me so we can staighten out
the deal or you can call Laura Scott in Canada and argue your point.  This is
on open OA difference and will continue to be until you handle it.

Elizabeth L Hernandez
07/21/2000 04:34 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jane S Saladino/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

I was able to change the first deal in Sitara, but the other pricing request
I did not feel comfortable making any changes.  Would you please look at this
pricing issue for Client Services since they need to get it paid on Monday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
07/21/2000 04:31 PM ---------------------------

Jane S Saladino
07/21/2000 04:10 PM
To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

Please correct the following deals:

Enron Canada purchase deal # 121397  Was 4.18427 should be 4.10185  This is
due to a Buy/back at Chippawa which reduces our Sithe transport by
$70,191.70   I normally book this manually (with Journal entry) but with SAP,
it needs to be in Unify and this is the only deal I can book it to.  The
Sithe transport is in Canadian dollars and this reduction is in US $.

Also I have the following deals which are scheduled different on our side
that Enron Canada and causes me about a $500 out of balance each month.  We
have netted this with other out of balances in previous months but with SAP,
I can no longer do this. Here is what happens:

ENA Books:  Purchase Deal 290657  for 30,390  MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.005 = $4,125,442.50
            Sale Deal 290652 for     ( 5,000) MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.0075=    678,375.00

  Total          $3,447,067.50

Enron Canada Books:

            Sale                  for 20,000 MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.005=   $2,715,000.00
  Sale                  for  5,390 MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.     =      732,501.00

  Total          $3,447,501.00

I don't know why we book a purchase and sale but it messes up the deal in
SAP.  Can we change the ENA sale deal 290652 to posting -.005 and the ENA
purchase deal # 290657 tier it for 25,000 at Posting -.005 and balance at
posting.  Let me know as soon as possible.  I need to pay this AM on Monday.

Thanks, Jane


this is cute!

 - RABBIT.jpg


The following items are attached for the PRC Committee Meeting this
afternoon:   Agenda; Folder Packets

If you have any problems or questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Thanks,

Jackie Martin (713-345-3563)
Assistant for
Gina Corteselli (713-345-3377)


Kevin,

Per our conversation this morning, the attached spreadsheet should give you an idea how we are managing NGPL NSS storage.  The spreadsheet breaks out the current inventory level and the daily rights associated with the storage.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Lee

312-541-1211


Set up by Vanessa Bob/36781 for Cindy Olson


The 2000 Form W-2 will be mailed to your address of record by January 31,
2001. If you have not received your form by February 20th, you may request,
in writing, for a duplicate copy to be sent to you. Please note that a
written request, including authorized signature is required.

When requesting a duplicate form, please specify the year for which you need
a copy, sign your request, and include the following information:

 Name
 Complete Mailing Address
 Phone Number
 Social Security Number

You may mail your request to:
 ENRON CORP
 EB 1528
 P O BOX 1188
 HOUSTON TX   77002

Or you may fax your request to 713-646-3755.

Your request will be processed within one week of receipt.

If you have a question regarding the information on your Form W2, please
contact the Payroll Call Center at 713-345-5555 option 1.

Thank you


When: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:00 PM-4:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

TJae,
Please could you get us a room for 20-30 mins,

thanks,

doug


Gerald,

There are a number of things that have come up on which I hope to get your assistance, concerning both Dow wells 13 and 14 and the land sale to Texas Brine.

Starting with Dow, I have written a (very rough!) draft reply to Gary Chapman's letter of October 2 regarding a new amendment to the Brine Services Agreement.
We still would like them to buy the pad gas, but, given the equipment purchases needed if we do have to remove the pad gas, we have to have a concrete deadline for whether they will buy the gas (Dec. 14).  Even so, in talking to Dave Owen it seems to me that the equipment may not be installed for rebrining by the time we exit the wells.  How do we handle that type of delay contractually?
Dave Owen has told Dow that we are not interested in allowing the fresh water option that Dow suggested in their letter, so I did not even address it here.  I think they understand that we want no part of that.
Perhaps we can discuss these and other issues after you've read the draft.

As for the Texas Brine land sale,
Jean has asked me to draw up a timeline to close.  I have spoken to the Texas Brine folks, and unless something goes really wrong with their environmental analysis,  we all expect this to close by the end of November.  The timeline reflects this, but I would like you to take a quick look and see if I am missing anything, as there really are not that many steps.
TB has not gotten back to us on the draft sale document, but I'm hoping to get it soon.
There has been a bit of delay as they have requested access to any environmental assessments we have done on the land.  All the channels I have pursued tell me there has never been anything done by Enron (per Kyle Purvis).  If you know anything about this, please let me know!
Do you have a draft of the easement agreement (?) for the March land sale?  I don't have alot of details about location etc, but I think I could find them out if necessary.  Perhaps while we are waiting for a reply on the sale doc we can hammer out the language for the easements on that and on the new land sale.

I think that's it for now, have a great weekend and please let me know if you have time to talk early next week.  Thanks!  Eva


<<MF June 6th 2001.pdf>>

			Good Wednesday Morning - Comments From The Local
Guys!

Yesterday, we received revised numbers on first quarter productivity, which
came in at -1.2% quarter-over-quarter on an annualized basis. On a
year-over-year basis, productivity remains at a relatively healthy 2.5%
rate, although this is half the pace at which it was running less than one
year ago. A slowdown in productivity is not unusual during an economic
slowdown. Corporations face fixed costs, while business is declining.
Unfortunately, that is why there are layoffs. With lower corporate costs,
productivity should improve as the economy picks up steam. Tomorrow, the
market will be receiving the weekly initial jobless claims, which are
expected to remain near last week's level. Lehman Brothers' economists look
for first-time unemployment insurance filings to total 415,000 for the week
ended Saturday, June 2.

The 30-year US T-Bond yield is 5.65%.
The 10-year note yield is 5.25%.
The 5-year is trading at 4.83%.
Spot crude oil is trading at $27.44 p/b.
Natural Gas - Henry Hub -  is trading at $3.85 p/mcf.

			AD Time:

New Federal Insider-Trading Rule (Rule 10b5-1) have been adopted by the SEC
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This rule greatly enhances an
insider's/employee's ability to trade his/her corporate shares during
blackout periods.
Previously, without the protection of this new SEC rule, employees and
insiders could safely trade only outside of designated blackout windows.
Under this new rule, insiders/employees may have the ability to purchase and
sell their corporate shares even during blackout periods if a written plan
was established and in force when the insider/employee was not in possession
of material, non-public information.
The new rule contains other restrictions and should be reviewed carefully.

Lehman Brothers has established a turn-key plan that take into account the
regulatory procedures for establishing such a plan.    Please email us or
call us for more information.

				Lehman Brothers' Research.

IMPACT CALLS

Procter & Gamble(PG) 2 - Buy A. Gillin Lefever, .212.526.5801
Morphing Into An Attack Aircraft Carrier
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $63.6 EPS 2000 N/A $2.95 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $79 - 53 EPS 2001 $3.10E $3.10E $3.11E 20.5
Mkt Cap: $90.8B EPS 2002 $3.25E $3.25E $3.27E 19.6
FY: 6/30 Price Target $69 $69
Rank 3 2
*We are upgrading PG to a Buy (2) rating based upon what we perceive as a
good trading opportunity in front of their June 15 outlook
meeting. We expect the meeting to highlight (1) more aggressive actions to
reduce PG's asset base than previously telegraphed; (2)
expect FY 02's recurring earnings growth to be confirmed at the
consensus-implied 6-8% rates and (3) expect previously stated long-term
growth targets to remain in place.
*Cost cutting /right-sizing remains the theme for the balance of the
calendar year / majority of FY 02. A very focused effort will
improve PG's competitiveness, but there is a reasonable probability PG will
exceed the previously telegraphed $400-$800 M in
incremental restructuring charges in order to further accelerate the
restructuring process.
*PG is slowly shifting its attention to sales growth but 4-6% long-term
growth is at least one fiscal year out. Maximum upside is
$72.00 absent any earnings-enhancing news.

National Service Indus(NSI) 3 - Market Perform D. Zwyer, .212.526.2008
Lowering Rating As Stock Approaches Price Target
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $25.73 EPS 2000 N/A $2.45 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $27 - 18 EPS 2001 $2.00E $2.00E $2.07E 12.9
Mkt Cap: $1.1B EPS 2002 $2.30E $2.30E $2.30E 11.2
FY: 8/31 Price Target $27 $27
Rank 1 3
*We are lowering our rating on National Service Industries' stock to 3
(Market Perform) from 1 (Strong Buy) based on valuation. The
stock has increased 37% since we initiated coverage on September 27, 2000,
outperforming a 10% drop in the S&P 500, and is near
our $27 price target. At about $26, NSI's stock trades at 13 times est.
fiscal (August) 2001 EPS of $2.00, and 11 times est. 2002 EPS
of $2.30. We do not see significant upside in the stock price from current
levels, and believe the shares will move with the market in
the near-term rather than outperform.
*We continue to expect difficult earnings comparisons for the second half of
2001, with a flattish 3Q (May) and a lower 4Q compared
with the prior year level. For the full year 2001, we expect lower earnings
in all segments: lighting, chemicals, linen rental, and
envelope. The risk to earnings going forward is a worse than expected drop
in non-residential construction impacting the company's
lighting business. Also, a drop in consumer spending would impact the linen
rental business.

Power 	D. Ford, .212.526.0836
No, The Sky is NOT Falling
*A change in investor sentiment towards the wholesale market has resulted in
a sell-off in the energy merchant stocks. We believe this
sell-off has been overdone and would recommend buying shares of Aquila,
Dynegy and Mirant.
*In our opinion, the apparent change in sentiment has been the result of
three factors: 1) a sector shift into tech stocks; 2) increased
perceived political risks on both the federal and state levels; and 3)
concerns about the potential for contracting commodity prices and
margins.
*While we do not see any catalysts that will stem this flow in the
near-term, we believe that preannouncement and upside earnings
surprises are just around the corner.
*Our favorite picks are energy merchants: Aquila, Dynegy and Mirant.

Global Crossing(GX) 2 - Buy D. Fletcher, .212.526.3375
Near-term Opportunity In Weighing Positives vs. Negatives
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $12.94 EPS 2000 N/A -$4.04 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $38 - 9 EPS 2001 -$3.25E -$3.25E -$3.17E N/A
Mkt Cap: $11.4B EPS 2002 -$3.19E -$3.19E -$3.15E N/A
FY: 12/31 Price Target $28 $28
Rank 2 2
*With the stock approaching all time lows, we believe positives outweigh
negatives here, and stock offers good near term upside.
*While long term challenges remain, such as dependence on IRUs for
growth/funding, GX is off 24% in last two weeks, is making
good progress in Commercial and is a clear leader in the bandwidth sector.
We believe there is good near term upside. In terms of
DCF valuation, we get to $15-$20/share, even haircutting our (below
guidance) #'s by 20%.
*GX has signed >$600M in Commercial contracts year-to-date, and Comm Svcs
grew 7% seq, in Q1, and should grow 9%+ in Q2.
*The subsea market is rationalizing, and the 4 major subsea players could
become 2 over next 12 mos.
*Long-term challenges include IRU sales, and 01 guidance may prove
aggressive, though we believe that is in the stock, and we
believe the company can hit our 01 Cash Rev number of $6.71B, +30% Y-Y.

INITIATING COVERAGE

Black Hills(BKH) 2 - Buy R. Gross, .212.526.3143
Initiate With Buy, Target Price $62 (A)
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $55.20 EPS 2000 N/A $2.37 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $55 - 22 EPS 2001 N/A $4.20E $3.77E 13.1
Mkt Cap: $1.5B EPS 2002 N/A $3.70E $3.35E 14.9
FY: 12/31 Price Target N/A $62
Rank N 2
*Strength In Western Power Markets Driving Near Term Results. Rapid Growth
In Unregulated Power Generating Capacity And
Successful Roll-Out Of Communications Network Drive Outlook Longer Term.
*Strong, Low Cost Utility Franchise Underpins Earnings And Cash Flow. Rate
Freeze Extended Through 2005.
*Potential Four-Fold Increase In Unregulated Generating Capacity By 2003
Primary Source Of Mid -Term Earnings Growth. Coal
Ownership Provides Opportunity For Further Significant Expansion.
*Strong Backdrop For Offsystem Sales And Fuel Marketing Funding Ramp In
Generating Capacity. Western Power Markets Tight
Beyond Current Year
*Communications Near Cash Flow Inflection Point As Rapid Acceptance Of
Bundled Service Offering Coupled With Mid-Year
Completion Of Network Drive Sharp Turn In Cash Flow And Valuation.

FOCUS STOCKS

McDonald's Corp(MCD) 1 - Strong Buy M. Speiser, .212.526.3255
McREIT? New tax ruling could spark spec of REIT spin-off
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $29.41 EPS 2000 N/A $1.46 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $36 - 25 EPS 2001 $1.46E $1.46E $1.49E 20.1
Mkt Cap: $40.7B EPS 2002 $1.66E $1.66E $1.67E 17.7
FY: 12/31 Price Target $38 $38
Rank 1 1
*A favorable IRS tax ruling on REITs can spark speculation that MCD can
unlock value by spinning-off its multi-billion dollar real
estate portfolio. With a new CFO to be appointed, this can further fuel
speculation. Reit 1-Strong Buy
*The IRS has reversed a tax ruling on treatment of REITs; this will present
oppty's for co's with lots of real estate, like MCD, to spin-off
real estate b/c it could now be done on a tax-free basis
*In the US, MCD has about $8bil of property & equipment & earned $1.4b of
rental income in 00
*The risk is the elimination of a steady income stream. But, the value of a
REIT is the tax benefit & higher Returns to MCD; lower
MCD earnings (no rental income) would be more than offset by ownership of
the REIT & its tax-free benefits
Back-of-envelope analysis yields $270mil in value ($0.20/share) due to
shifting the rental income of owned sites under franchised
stores to non-taxable status; other benefits are likely.

Electronic Data Sys(EDS) 2 - Buy K. Keirstead, .212.526.0442
Addressing the Balance Sheet and Other Concerns
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $61.90 EPS 2000 N/A $2.29 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $67 - 38 EPS 2001 $2.63E $2.63E $2.64E 23.5
Mkt Cap: $29.6B EPS 2002 $2.98E $2.98E $3.00E 20.8
FY: 12/31 Price Target $75 $75
Rank 2 2
*EDS shares have underperformed the major indices and CSC shares since
reporting strong 1Q01 results. We attribute this to some
concerns around the recent acquisitions, the need to access the public
markets to finance these deals and the increase in DSO's and the
drop in cash flow reported in 1Q01.
*Late last week we had a private call with the controller of EDS to address
the balance sheet issues. We believe that the key issue is
the volume of large deals ramping in 1H01. Receivable terms on large
outsourcing deals are often extended in the early stages of
contracts. On selected large deals, we also suspect that EDS (and perhaps
others) may be offering up-front price discounts, adding to
the cash flow requirement although average margins over the life of a
contract appear stable. We do not expect DSO's to decrease
materially until perhaps 4Q01.
*At 23 times forward estimated EPS for a 15% EPS growth rate story with high
visibility, we remain comfortable with EDS and our 2-
Buy rating.

COMPANY/INDUSTRY UPDATES

Integrated Oil P. Cheng, .212.526.1884
Weekly U.S. Crude Oil & Refined Products Inventory Summary
*Absent any new major refinery or pipeline accidents, we expect gasoline
futures to drop to below $0.80 per gallon within the next
several weeks. In addition, gasoline inventories should continue to build on
average by about 0.5-1.0 million barrels per week over
the next two months due to strong domestic output and weak demand. We
continue to recommend an underweight position in the
independent refiners group.

Paper & Forest Products P. Ruschmeier, .212.526.9898
IRS Revenue Ruling Supports Bullish Timber Thesis
*As we indicated yesterday (6/5/01), IRS revenue ruling 2001-29 has positive
implications for the pending merger between PCL and
TGP and positive implications for a structural shift in timber ownership
from C-Corps to REITs over time. We are reiterating our
favorable ratings on companies with the greatest timberland exposure
including WY, LPX, TIN, BCC, IP, BOW, & TGP.
*Yesterday (6/5/01) we learned that the IRS reversed a 1973 revenue ruling
that prevents REITs from engaging in the active conduct
of a trade or business.
*We believe the ruling is an important first step in paving the way for
timber-rich companies to transition ownership of timber cash
flow from a C-corp. structure to a tax-advantaged REIT structure.
*We believe the ruling supports a favorable outcome to the PCL/TGP merger.

Internet Healthcare R. Rouse, .212.526.7347
MORE CRO UPSIDE - THE BIOTECHS ARE COMING !!!
*The CROs are poised to take advantage of two significant trends that we
pose are underway: 1. the much anticipated "biotech bulge"
may be upon us sooner than expected (a long-term catalyst); and 2. this is
in addition to our previous call for efficiency gains and
margin upside given a return to normalized late-stage trial volume (a
near-term catalyst).
*Proprietary pipeline analysis and industry anecdotes lead us to the
proposition that the beginning of a wave of novel drugs is entering
clinical development. This creates bottlenecks for drug sponsors and
opportunities for service vendors. Diversified CROs (CVD,
PPDI, & QTRN) and niche providers (AAII & ARRY) could reap benefits as early
as this year while those more clinically focused
(KNDL & PRXL) could see upside by the end of next year.

Insurance/Life E. Berg, .212.526.2805
Estate Tax Reform: With New Focus Any Damage Will Be Minor
*An effort by us to quantify the impact on life insurers of the change in
the Federal estate-tax law passed last week by Congress is
leading us to affirm our 1-Strong Buy ratings on Manulife, Nationwide, and
John Hancock.
*The bottom line to our analysis: While these three life insurers and others
could lose as much as one-third of their existing estate-tax-oriented
policies and growth in new sales of estate-tax-oriented life insurance could
also slow by a third its still not a big deal. The
entire loss, between existing and new policies combined, would translate
only into about a 5 % to 10 % loss of revenues and earnings
companywide because estate planning is only a portion of their business.

Albertson's, Inc(ABS) 3 - Market Perform M. Adler, .212.526.7146
Right-sizing the business is still to come
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $27.73 EPS 2001 N/A $2.08 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $38 - 20 EPS 2002 $1.96E $1.93E $2.04E 14.4
Mkt Cap: $11.3B EPS 2003 N/A N/A $2.25E N/A
FY: 1/31 Price Target N/A N/A
Rank 3 3
*ABS is just beginning the arduous process of a turnaround, with a new CEO
that is willing and able to lead. He is evaluating every
aspect of the business, and is prepared to right size the company through
divestitures of profitable assets that have weak long-term
prospects.
*ABS reported 1Q01 EPS of $0.46, $0.01 ahead of our estimates and consensus.
Sales were in line with our estimates, but the
operating margin deteriorated by only 39 bp versus the 60 bp we had
forecast.
*We have lowered our 2Q01 estimate from $0.47 to $0.45, and our FY02
estimates from $1.96 to $1.93.
*With our new lower estimate, ABS' stock is trading at a 2001 P/E 14.4x, a
mere 1.5 multiple point discount to KR, which we rate a 1-
Strong Buy ($24.78). We think this gap is too narrow given the differences
in earnings outlook and asset quality, so we are
maintaining our 3-Market Perform rating

David C. Morris
Sr. VP Lehman Brothers
713-652-7112/800-227-4537
dcmorris@lehman.com

Disclosure Legend: A-Lehman Brothers Inc. managed or co-managed within the
past three years a public offering of securities for this company. B-An
employee of Lehman Brothers Inc. is a director of this company. C-Lehman
Brothers Inc. makes a market in the securities of this company. G-The
Lehman Brothers analyst who covers this company also has position in its
securities.
Key to Investment Rankings: This is a guide to expected total return (price
performance plus dividend) relative to the total return of the stock's local
market over the next 12 months. 1 = Strong Buy (expected to outperform the
market by 15 or more percentage points); 2=Buy (expected to outperform
the market by 5-15 percentage points); 3=Market Perform (expected to perform
in line with the market, plus or minus 5 percentage points); 4=Market
Underperform (expected to underperform the market by 5-15 percentage
points); 5=Sell (expected to underperform the market by 15 or more
percentage
points).
This document is for information purposes only. We do not represent that
this information is complete or accurate. All opinions are subject to
change.
The securities mentioned may not be eligible for sale in some states or
countries. This document has been prepared by Lehman Brothers Inc., Member
SIPC, on behalf of Lehman Brothers International (Europe), which is
regulated by the SFA. ?Lehman Brothers, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - MF June 6th 2001.pdf


As requested a "final" meeting has been arranged on Monday, 9th August at
Clifford Chance (a room has been booked for the full day).  Could you please
let me know asap if this is going to be a problem.

I am waiting to hear from David Gilbert/Ken Raisler of Sullivan & Cromwell to
ascertain who will be attending.  I will follow up this pm.

Andrew Wilkinson will not be able to attend this meeting - he is on paternity
leave at present.

Thank you.

Regards.

Tracy - Ext. 7374


---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
07:30 PM ---------------------------

"Bonner, Thomas D" <TDBonner@midamerican.com> on 04/27/2000 12:36:46 PM
To: "'apkavanagh@aep.com'" <apkavanagh@aep.com>, "'aae@dellnet.com'"
<aae@dellnet.com>, "'Ron_Moeller@cargill.com'" <Ron_Moeller@cargill.com>,
"'Linda_Thrasher@cargill.com'" <Linda_Thrasher@cargill.com>,
"'Elizabeth.Moler@ucm.com'" <Elizabeth.Moler@ucm.com>, "'myacker@elcon.org'"
<myacker@elcon.org>, "'csandhe@enron.com'" <csandhe@enron.com>,
"'cstinger@gpu.com'" <cstinger@gpu.com>, "'jryan@cla.ci.la.ca.us'"
<jryan@cla.ci.la.ca.us>, "'bud_Albright@reliantenergy.com'"
<bud_Albright@reliantenergy.com>, "'chris_giblin@reliantenergy.com'"
<chris_giblin@reliantenergy.com>, "'bonnie.suchman@troutmansanders.com'"
<bonnie.suchman@troutmansanders.com>, "'CREASTMA@srpnet.com'"
<CREASTMA@srpnet.com>, "'wneal@oppd.com'" <wneal@oppd.com>,
"'adeboissiere@cinergy.com'" <adeboissiere@cinergy.com>,
"'blibro@mnpower.com'" <blibro@mnpower.com>, "'tanderson@lthenergy.com'"
<tanderson@lthenergy.com>, "'susan_l_labombard@ameren.com'"
<susan_l_labombard@ameren.com>, "'dlimbac@alleghenyenergy.com'"
<dlimbac@alleghenyenergy.com>, "'JSheffer@En-NetServices.com'"
<JSheffer@En-NetServices.com>, "'Annie.Caputo@ucm.com'"
<Annie.Caputo@ucm.com>, "'larry.bruneel@wepco.com'"
<larry.bruneel@wepco.com>, "'loomis@neesnet.com'" <loomis@neesnet.com>,
"'bburchet@wrf.com'" <bburchet@wrf.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Meeting on Roundtable Policy Statement

I just received the following questions from NARUC re: the transmission
provisions.  My initial political response to the majority of the questions
(goodness knows you're not going to get a substantive response out of me --
that's other folks' job) is that these things are going to happen anyway as
a result of external factors (particularly RTO formation).  Our proposal
reflects an attempt to find a reasonable transition process to get from
point A to point B.

I don't expect to do a whole lot of the talking at this meeting, so our
legal types should be prepared to go.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gray, Charles [mailto:CGray@naruc.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 9:34 AM
To: 'Bonner, Thomas D'
Cc: Mele, Chris
Subject: Meeting on Roundtable Policy Statement

Tom -

In preparation for our meeting this afternoon, I've put together the
following questions.  Look forward to seeing you at 1:30.

Here are the questions:

Questions concerning transmission jurisdiction:

1. How would FERC's jurisdiction over all transmission services
work (retail and wholesale, bundled and unbundled)?
2. Particularly, in a mechanical sense, how would FERC's authority
to regulate the transmission component of bundled retail service work?
Would FERC set a rate that would then be reflected in retail rates and
bills?
3. Would this process directly or indirectly require that retail
services be unbundled, notwithstanding State policies to the contrary?
4. Is it the case that the principles require that all transmission
uses be treated identically?  E.G, would bundled retail and unbundled
wholesale services be provided under identical rates, terms and
conditions?  Is it the stakeholders' view that these are equivalent
services?
5. Retail customers have borne the burden of financially supporting
the cost of the transmission network through so-called residual
ratemaking.  Do the stakeholders believe that these customers have any
equitable claim on the transmission system?  Should native load
customers be compensated for any loss of priority or preferential access
to transmission services?
6. Do the stakeholders support the extension of FERC's jurisdiction
to all transmission services provided by all classes of transmission
owners, e.g. munis, coops and PMAs?  More specifically, would FERC have
jurisdiction over bundled transmission service provided to customers of
munis and coops?  If so, would such services be treated identically with
wholesale services? With IOU services?
7. Must FERC have exclusive jurisdiction over all transmission uses
or is some compromise involving shared jurisdiction over retail services
possible?  E.G., right of appeal to FERC for discriminatory State
commission decision, delegation of FERC authority to regional group of
State regulators.
8. Concerning the Roundtable Policy, how does the reservation of
transmission capacity for native load work?  Does this mean that they
will have preferential rights to capacity in constrained situations?
Does it matter whether retail services are bundled or unbundled?


Are you part of this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dalia, Minal
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Davenport, Lacrecia; Hayden, Frank; Port, David; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Khanna, Bharat
Subject: FW: CNN show about Enron

-----Original Message-----
From: Gustafson, Mollie
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:35 AM
To: DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject: FW: CNN show about Enron
FYI?

-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Gustafson, Mollie
Subject: FW: CNN show about Enron

 Note that there will be a show on CNN about Enron today at 6pm (Eastern)

AIRS   <http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/moneyline/images/icon.triangle.gif>6:00 p.m. ET on CNN, CNNfn
Replays at 10 p.m. ET on CNNfn
Tuesday, November 27, 2001
  <http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/moneyline/images/2001/11/enron.ap.jpg>

What to do when your company's stock has dropped 90 percent? Find out how a Houston energy company is making a comeback and moving forward on a controversial buyout. Join Lou Dobbs for a report on the troubles at Enron.

Click here <http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/> for CNN.com's complete coverage


This was great -- and I saw myself in a number of these!!  It must be too
long -- but that is who I am right now!  --Sally


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/17/01.   Please note that
Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Resources and Sierra Pacific Power
Company were all placed on NO TRADES and Select Energy, Inc. was placed on
Call Credit.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Dont worry about getting the press reports. Our PR dept has that covered.

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	11/30/2000 05:00 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>,
rgiibbs@gibbs-bruns.com, Robert.C.Williams@enron.com, msmith1@enron.com
		 cc: "Lamb, Daniel G." <DLamb@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: San Diego Case Status Report

Here are the results of our efforts so far:

Discussions with Local Counsel:
 Here is the list of firms and individuals that we have contacted as
well as the results of conflict checks and availability.  In short, There
are some conflict issues with several of the firms.  One firm was directly
conflicted.  Another has as one of its partners, the wife of Len Simon, the
lead plaintiff's counsel in our case.  Assuming that conflicts can be
resolved, we have five different lawyers available to be interviewed on
Monday.

 <<status11.30.doc>>
Economic Experts

 Local

  Retained:  Carey P.  Mack,  Bruno & Mack
  The best testifying expert in town, economic accounting
damages.  Relates best to San Diego jury.   Not an anti-trust
model building type of expert.

  Tom Lambert
   Solo (he is checking conflict list right now.  If no
conflict, he is willing to work for us.)

  Broadshatzer, Wallace, Spoon & Yip
   Roberta Spoon (on vacation)
 National
  Charles River
    Gordon Rausser will be meeting with CEO of
Enron, Ken Lay on other matters on Friday 10:00a.m. in Houston on another
matter.  They are very interested in being retained.  They are doing
conflict check. He is willing to stop by and see you if that would be
helpful.
  NERA
   Waiting for response

Non-testifying Consultants

 Larry Ruff
  RETAINED: to assist in reviewing EPMI data.

Procedural Issues:

 We are investigating to see whether there are any California
defendants to consider removal.  Because we  attended  the press
conference (momentarily and obtained a copy of the complaint) we should
assume that  the removal clock is ticking.
News Reports

 We have identified a service that has recorded the news reports
about this lawsuit.  There are 28 hits so far for TV reports.  It will cost
$300 per clip to obtain them.  Do you know if Enron is getting these clips
from the public relations firm?  Should we get them?

Anti-Trust Law School Professors.

 We have identified Tom Campbell (ran against Diane Feinstein for
Senate.  We have a number for him in Washington good until tomorrow.  He was
former Director Competitive Compliance Division FTC, has Harvard Ph.D. in
Economics.  Should we contact him?

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - status11.30.doc


You have a appt at 12:00


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/28/2000
07:28 AM ---------------------------

Bill MacDonald <bill@crgmail.com> on 08/25/2000 06:49:47 PM
To: CRG Publications Subscribers
<IMCEAEX-_O=COMPENSATION+20RESOURCE+20GROUP+2C+20INC+2E_OU=HEADQUARTERS_CN=REC
IPIENTS_CN=CRGPUB@crgmail.com>
cc:

Subject: Compensation Resource Group, Inc.'s Publications

August 25, 2000
Dear Subscriber:
Compensation Resource Group, Inc., http://www.crgworld.com, would like to
thank you for taking an interest in our 2000 Survey of Current Trends - A
survey of Executive Benefits for the Fortune 1000. We would like to let you
know that a full color PDF version of the seventh annual survey has been
posted to CRG,s Publications web page, http://www.crgworld.com/publications.
To download a free copy of the Survey:
1. Go to http://www.crgworld.com/publications.
2. Type in your E-Mail address and click Login.
3. If you have not previously registered with us, you will be asked to fill
out the short registration form.  Once you complete the form, click "SUBMIT".
Then you can download and print.
Once again we would like to thank you for your continued interest.

Sincerely,
William L. MacDonald
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer


Barbara,

We shall extend the funding for the seminar in the fall for the next season.

I shall be glad to cover the cost of a coffee mug with our logos. Can you
identify a
producer who can come up with a design?
I think that we may use the company that produces
RICE memorabilia.

I shall run  the design through our PR Department and then we can have it
produced.

Vince

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 05/24/2000 01:15:12 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com (Vince Kaminski)
cc:
Subject: Rice/Enron Finance Seminar Series

Vince:

I have checked with our accounting folks and it looks like the balance in
the seminar account is under $5000.  This will get us going in the fall so
we have some flexibility for the next Enron funding - whatever works best
on your end.

Also, I am interested in pursuing the idea of designing some sort of a gift
- a coffee cup perhaps - to give to our seminar guests.  I think we could
do something neat with the Enron and Rice/JGS logos that folks would be
happy to display on their shelf or desk top.  What do you think?

As always, thank you so much for your support of our efforts over here.  It
is truly appreciated.

bbo

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek      713-348-5384 (voice)
Assistant Professor of Finance    713-348-5251 (fax)
Jones Graduate School of Management   ostdiek@rice.edu
Rice University     www.ruf.rice.edu/~ostdiek/
6100 Main Street - MS 531
Houston, TX 77005-1892


Ben, please use these for TECO. thanks, Scot
---------------------- Forwarded by Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/23/2000 01:38 PM ---------------------------

Scot Chambers
03/23/2000 10:59 AM
To: Robert E Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: LM6000 Proforma O&M Questionaire

Bob, here's the blank forms for info. Also, there is a questionnaire written
for SC LM6000 plants. Answer what you can and ignore if n/a or redundant.

The DePere info sheet is in hardcopy since we did it over in your
workstation. I'll have a copy faxed. Please provide you fax #.

thanks


PLEASE OPEN THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENT AND SNED IN YOUR RESPONSE ASAP.  THIS IS
A QUICK SURVEY THAT WILL HELP THE SVMG TO PREPARE A PROTEST TO PG&E IN
REGARDS TO THE OBMC PROGRAM.  THANK YOU FOR TAKING A MOMENT TO PROVIDE US
WITH YOUR CONCERNS AND FEEDBACK.
 - OBMC protest 041201.doc


I don't understand.  We were dealing with Ameren Services Company, who had
been approved to trade online and they are the agent for Union Electric
Company and Central Illinois Public Service.  Now they want to trade as
another agent, for Union Electric and other affiliates.  Why are we not going
to allow them to trade online?.  Leslie has approved them to trade over the
counter under this name.

SHARI STACK
08/29/2000 05:28 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/29/00

Thanks for this. Please consider "Ameren Energy, Inc. as agent" declined by
Legal.

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 05:27 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	08/29/2000 05:26 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/29/00

I just had this conv. w/Mark and Marcus Nettleton today about parties acting
as agent, or in some fiduciary capacity online.  What I am being told is that
the system is set up for parties to only act as principals for online
trading.  It does not deal with agent, fiduciary or similar relationships.
The only exception to this rule so far has been GPU where they had an agency
relationship with 3 utilities, on the power side, where Leslie had some
specific documentation that she got signed.  But I am told should not be
entering into transactions with counterparties as anything other than
principals, except under extraordinary circumstances.

	Shari Stack
	08/29/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/29/00

Tana:

"Ameren Energy, Inc. as agent":  On hold til I speak with Leslie. I imagine
they will need to sign our std. Consent & Acknowledgement form which allows
them act as agent. It would be helpful to know for whom they are acting as
agent. Do you know this?

**************************

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

Ameren Service Company - Restricted by Credit
Oglethorpe Power Corporation.- Not a current CP/Not FERC approved
Curbell, Inc. -   Restricted by Credit

Thanks,

Shari


-----Original Message-----
From: 	McConnell, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:59 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill; Kilmer III, Robert
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	TransPecos LOI 1/15/02

Bill and Rob,

Attached is the latest stab at the referenced LOI.  Please call Kim or myself with any questions about what we were trying to achieve with the new language.

Also, if you are able to get your comments back to us by around 2:00, we'll route this to the rest of the internal "check points" before we present it to Kinder Morgan.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


Sharen,

Kate Symes asked me to email you and let you know that we do verbal confirms
with Valley Electric.  We speak with Valley quite often, and confirm deals
with them over the phone.  We have never sent them paper confirms, and we
would like to keep the relationship the way it is.  If you have any questions
please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,
Stan
(503) 464-3829


you still here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: RE:

good try at the lingo but an inappropriate usage due to the fact monday morning is when YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO WORK OUT.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Mon 11/26/2001 4:01 PM
To: Arnold, John
Cc:
Subject: RE:

thanks for the look

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Arnold, John
Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To:     Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:        RE:

I went already lazy

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To:     Arnold, John
Subject:

Did you go this morning?  If not, do you want to go after work?


Oops!  June 6th is a Wednesday, not a Tuesday!  Many thanks to Nidia Mendoza
for calling this to my attention!

----- Forwarded by Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 04:40 PM -----

	Becky Spencer
	04/04/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Nidia Mendoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Radous/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward
Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate, Brant Reves/Enron@EnronXGate, Veronica
Espinoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudwell Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate, Ken
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Aparna Rajaram/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason R
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Russell Diamond/Enron@EnronXGate, Darren
Vanek/Enron@EnronXGate, Carol North/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendi
LeBrocq/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: MaryHelen Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet Cones/Enron@EnronXGate, Keegan
Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Esmeralda
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, (bcc: Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Upcoming Dates for Credit/Legal Seminar (Revised)

Please note new dates times and locations!

We will be continuing the Credit/Legal seminars on the following schedule.
Please add these dates to your calendars:

Session 3:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13
April 4 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 4:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 (continued)
April 18 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 5:  The Credit Worksheet
May 9 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c1

Session 6:  Letters of Credit, Guaranties and Equity Structures
May 23 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 7:  Higher Risk Counterparties, Early Termination, Master Netting
Issues and Canadian Issues
June 6 (Tuesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 8:  (if needed)
June 20
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 9:  (if needed)
July 11
2:00-3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

A reminder e-mail will be sent a day or two before each session.  Due to the
amount of information discussed and time constraints, please be aware that
the topics on these dates may run over to the following sessions.


WAMEX Holdings - http://www.wamx.com/

Please find below the two most recent press releases for Wamex Holdings,
Inc. (OTC: WAMX)

Tuesday May 29, 7:02 am Eastern Time

Press Release

Wamex Secures Bridge Funding to Help Get Internet Trading System Online

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 29, 2001--Wamex Holdings Inc. (OTC:WAMX -
news) today announced that it received the first cash payments as part of
an advance towards the funding it needs to get its Internet Trading System
online.

Macrocom Investors, LLC, a New York financial firm, has agreed in
principle to initial financing in the amount of $500,000, with the
prospect of further investment when due diligence is completed, according
to Sascha Mundstein, Wamex CEO.

The advance, Mundstein speculated, could be the first increment in a total
financing package that will enable Wamex to fulfill its role in the
"Instox" joint venture pledged to bring its Internet Trading System online
worldwide, and generating revenues.

"The funding is contingent on Macrocom's satisfaction that the Internet
Trading System software really works, and we know that it does -- it has
been demonstrated," Mundstein said.

The Wamex CEO expressed the hope that this financial boost signals major
progress toward the total recovery of Wamex, which he has been working to
achieve since taking over the company late in 2000.  Wamex is 50% partner
in a joint venture with Trat.net Ltd. and CSCO Ltd., officially named
"Instox." Instox is developing the Web site that will bring investors
international access to a direct, online, one-on-one, "no middleman"
trading facility, wherein third party price manipulation and distortion
may be greatly reduced or eliminated.

"The day Instox opens the Internet Trading System to investors will be the
day the investment business begins a radical change for the better,"
Mundstein said.

Safe Harbor Statement: This release may contain certain forward-looking
statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual events or
results may differ from the company's expectations.

Contact:
Asset Professional Services, Houston
Jack Burney, 713/729-5233
burney00@swbell.net

Thursday May 31, 7:01 am Eastern Time

Press Release

Wamex to Complete Problematic 3-Year Audit and File Its 10K With SEC

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 31, 2001--Wamex Holdings Inc. (OTC:WAMX -
news) today announced the impending completion of a problematic 3-year
audit, which will pave the way for the filing of an up-to-date 10K annual
report with the SEC.

The audit and 10K filing will remove a significant obstacle to the
re-listing of WAMX stock on the OTC Bulletin Board, Sascha Mundstein, CEO,
speculated.

"Hopefully, we will complete the audit in the very near future and the
filing of the 10K annual report will follow shortly," Mundstein said. "The
pursuit of an accurate audit has been an arduous task, and we will be
happy to put it behind us. We are geared to keep Wamex dealings absolutely
accurate and above board in the future."

Wamex lost its listing in mid-2000 after two of its officers were charged
with illegal dealings. They have subsequently left the company. The
company itself, Mundstein said, has never been accused of any wrong-doing.

The audit was complicated by a convoluted trail going back to 1998,
involving problems such as monies deposited in subsidiary and alternate
companies by previous management, before Mundstein took charge last year
to rescue Wamex. Former executives connected to these transactions have
long since resigned from the company and foregone any control of its
stock.

The prospect of Wamex's return to the OTC Bulletin Board, and the
projected opening this year of the "Instox" international Web site,
offering the private investor a chance to trade one-on-one without
middlemen and price distortion, Mundstein said, "puts our corporation back
on the track leading to stability and profitability."

Safe Harbor Statement: This release may contain certain forward-looking
statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual events or
results may differ from the company's expectations.

Contact:
Asset Professional Services, Houston
Jack Burney, 713/729-5233
burney00@swbell.net.

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to wamex-unsubscribe@listbot.com


Recap of my discussion with Heidi:

 All Confirms done and signed by Sydney
 Reconciliation and Cash Management of Futures account done by Sydney

 By the end of the month, Enpower data will be mechanically extracted to
produce invoices
  (as opposed to manual keying of data in spreadsheets and verification by
Sydney and Houston)
 A Settlements Clerk has been hired (starts 07/24) and will report to Heidi.
Settlements clerk will prepare invoices.
  Invoices will be approved by Risk Book Admin. (Paul/Allan) and Heidi

 Paul and Allan will have a direct line to Heidi and a dotted line to
myself.  Apparently there is some concern voiced by both
 of these guys regarding additional risk related opportunities elsewhere in
the company.  I think that Paul is trying to get involved
 in the Japan activities.  Heidi indicated that neither seem happy with the
current situation and reporting to Sue.

 Heidi and I will continue dialogs.

Sue is not a prerequisite for anything above.  Sydney has it covered!

SRM (x3548)


Attached are two versions of a press release.  We plan to issue one of these before market open tomorrow.  The second version assumes financial close on the remainder of the secured credit facility (I need someone to confirm or deny).  The first version speaks only to the merger and our debt restructuring efforts.  Please review and provide comments as soon as possible to me and Karen Denne (karen.denne@enron.com).  I understand that Jeff McMahon and Jimmy Lee will discuss the attached at 7:00 CST tomorrow.


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043010.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Document attached

 - Concurrent Employment Common Paymaster.doc


We are currently discussing several potential approaches for a "Phase VII" expansion project.  We have preliminary work underway on several potential scenarios, some of which might involve Gulfstream as an upstream transporter.

As part of these discussions, Gulfstream has inquired about FGT's interest in providing a capacity lease for backhaul service (approximately 20-30 miles - they did not identify the specific market).

My questions are:
	(1) Backhaul capacity lease with an interstate pipeline - Do you see any problems/issues?  The lease arrangement would be with Guflstream Pipeline.

	(2) If this backhaul lease capacity is used by Gulfstream to provide deliveries to an electric generator, would the FP&L Favored Nations Clause be triggered?


Hi Mark,

Please forward this information to the time-keeper in order that her time off
will be coded  correctly. An alternative would be for Carol to complete her
timesheets before she leaves.  With SAP this can be done in advance.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 07/06/2000 07:33 PM
To: Michele Word/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Carol St. Clair

Michele:

Just to let you know that I have approved the following for Carol:

1. In addition to the 6 weeks that Enron allows for leave, Carol will add to
that period by using any remaining vacation time that she has for 2000 (I
believe an additional 10-12 days).

2. After that time is used up, Carol will be on an unpaid leave of absence
until December 31, 2000.

Please let me know if there is anything else you need.

Mark


I will attend the UT Super Saturday.  Who is in charge of the event?


Gus,

I believe that Ben is also looking for all the historical reports.  If those
are available, please provide them to Ben.

Thanks,

Don


THANKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Grigsby, Mike
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.; Tholan, Scott; Turner, Nancy
Subject:	El Paso Update 7/23/011

Sources at OPS indicate that once OPS completes its review of line 1110 and approves it to come back online, there is no formal process to grant El Paso permission to bring the entire system back to full capacity at 1.1 bcf/d. Therefore, once the inspection/repairs are completed by El Paso, the company will seek permission from OPS to resume to full service. OPS would probably grant them approval within a matter of days. The uncertainty still lies in the time it will take to interpret pigging data and for OPS to conduct its review.


Nicole Mendez

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Manguba, Jimmy
Sent:	Friday, February 23, 2001 11:38 AM
To:	Stokes, Cindy; Ingram, Renee; Mendez, Nicole; Lunz, Lisa; Wackerle, Donna
Cc:	Aune, Stacey; Armstrong, James; Cernosek, Frank
Subject:	Please send this file to all your respective users

Win2000 problem (not my fault)

Symptoms: 	1. Sluggish performance in any Microsoft Office product.
		2. When using the SAVE AS feature ... Users typing is faster than the computer.

Workaround:	Double-click the file attached ... save to disk and execute the file.

Status:		Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem with Enrons network structure.  No ETA.

FYI:		Everytime a file, such as a spreadsheet or document, is open it is stored to a folder on the H:\ drive as a shortcut.  Eventually this folder is overwhelmed with shortcuts and thus causing the problem.

Please note: 	This is only for EB24 users and friends.


All:

As some of you may be aware, we appear to be getting close to entering a
transaction with NSTAR to serve its all-requirements power needs for its
Residential and Commercial customer class Default Service obligations.  The
deal would be for a term of 6 or 12 months commencing July 1, 2001.  NSTAR's
service territory covers Boston and surrounds, as well as south-eastern
Massachusetts.  This prospective deal is very similar in nature to the
Standard Offer Service deals we have entered into with United Illuminating,
NSTAR, and most recently, Central Maine Power.

Here is the status at this point:
NSTAR achieved various levels of signoff for the basic deal structure (both
with regulators and internal senior management).  NSTAR has indicated that it
has basically come down to price and they could potentially pull the trigger
as early as Monday, but certainly within a couple of days at the most.
NSTAR has requested updated pricing by 10 AM Eastern on Monday 3/26 to be
held firm through COB same day (contingent upon execution of definitive
agreements by that time).  They are seeking pricing updates from competing
suppliers so we are not exclusive at this point.
NSTAR/Enron have worked through our extensive markups on their proposed
contract, and have compiled a list of outstanding contract issues. (Note:
Marcus Nettelton has been leading our legal efforts on this deal, and can be
reached at 5-8161 to discuss contract issues).   While the number of
outstanding contract items are numerous at this point, my sense is that there
are no real deal breakers on either their end or ours.  In fact, they have
agreed to many of the open issues in our previous contract with them for
Standard Offer Service, so they could potentially agree to our terms without
much delay, thereby potentially making execution on Monday a possibility.

Attached is a draft DASH for this deal .  I request that you review it
promptly with a goal to have each of your signoffs for this deal in principle
by mid-afternoon on Monday so as to enable us to transact on Monday if
necessary.  The parameters that are still in motion are:  (1) price (again to
e updated Monday morning), but will maintain same NPV value; (2) term (they
may end up just going for 6 months); and (3) exact volume they source from
us.  As for volume, they indicated they may want to go with us for something
less than 100% of their requirements for the first 6 months (they estimate
anywhere between 50-100%), and then potentially a smaller percentage for the
second 6 months if they do end up doing a 12-month deal.

Please feel free to call me (978-449-9936 office, 978-448-9260 home over the
weekend) if you would like to discuss in more detail.   Berney Aucoin in
Structuring will be on point to run internal traps on Monday as may be
necessary.  Thanks in advance.

Regards
John


Jeff:

Here are the draft definitions and the list of which companies are to review
which definitions.  They have asked for our comments by the 15th (next
Wednesday).  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/07/99 08:51 AM
---------------------------

Corrinne Greasley <CGREASLEY@isda.org> on 12/01/99 10:26:23 AM
To: "'bobna@crt.com'" <bobna@crt.com>, "'simon.smith@eastern.co.uk'"
<simon.smith@eastern.co.uk>, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'patricia.hogan@gs.com'" <patricia.hogan@gs.com>,
"'prince.keir@gs.com'" <prince.keir@gs.com>, "'ccerria@hess.com'"
<ccerria@hess.com>, "'MacraeE@mbcl.co.uk'" <MacraeE@mbcl.co.uk>,
"'roffeym@mbcl.co.uk'" <roffeym@mbcl.co.uk>, "'bmccoy@ms.com'"
<bmccoy@ms.com>, "'rita.pearson-schwandt@energie.rwe.de'"
<rita.pearson-schwandt@energie.rwe.de>, "'dbf@vitol.com'" <dbf@vitol.com>,
"'edmund.ha@ontariopowergeneration.com'"
<edmund.ha@ontariopowergeneration.com>,
"'joseph.campos@ontariopowergeneration.com'"
<joseph.campos@ontariopowergeneration.com>, "'lmcmurray@exchange.ml.com'"
<lmcmurray@exchange.ml.com>
cc: Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org>,  "', kellis@cravath.com'"  <>,
kellis@cravath.com
Subject: Draft of the Supplement to the 1993 Commodity Derivatives Definit
ions

Attached please find the most recent draft of the 1999 Supplement to the
1993 Commodity Derivatives Definitions to be used in preparation for the
telephone conference call scheduled for 11am New York time, tomorrow
December 2, 1999.   You do not need to review this draft prior to the call.
It will serve as the basis of dividing up the rates for final review.  The
introduction and practice note will follow shortly.

Thanks again for your assistance in this project.

Bob Pickel
General Counsel

 <<supp1130a.doc>>

 - supp1130a.doc
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/07/99 08:51 AM
---------------------------

Corrinne Greasley <CGREASLEY@isda.org> on 12/02/99 06:08:25 PM
To: "'bobna@crt.com'" <bobna@crt.com>, "'simon.smith@eastern.co.uk'"
<simon.smith@eastern.co.uk>, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'patricia.hogan@gs.com'" <patricia.hogan@gs.com>,
"'prince.keir@gs.com'" <prince.keir@gs.com>, "'ccerria@hess.com'"
<ccerria@hess.com>, "'MacraeE@mbcl.co.uk'" <MacraeE@mbcl.co.uk>,
"'roffeym@mbcl.co.uk'" <roffeym@mbcl.co.uk>, "'bmccoy@ms.com'"
<bmccoy@ms.com>, "'rita.pearson-schwandt@energie.rwe.de'"
<rita.pearson-schwandt@energie.rwe.de>, "'dbf@vitol.com'" <dbf@vitol.com>,
"'edmund.ha@ontariopowergeneration.com'"
<edmund.ha@ontariopowergeneration.com>,
"'joseph.campos@ontariopowergeneration.com'"
<joseph.campos@ontariopowergeneration.com>, "'lmcmurray@exchange.ml.com'"
<lmcmurray@exchange.ml.com>, "'adele.raspe2@pseg.com'"
<adele.raspe2@pseg.com>, "'shindlg@phibro.com'" <shindlg@phibro.com>
cc: Kianga Ellis <kellis@cravath.com>, Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org>
Subject: 1999 Supplement to the 1993 Commodity Derivatives Definitions

Following our telephone conference call today a list of the commodities and
firms which will be responsible for verifying the associated Reference Price
Source has been prepared (see enerlist.xls attached).  This file also
contains the telephone, fax and e-mail details of all the participants in
this project.  As requested a blacklined copy of the last several sections
of the draft  Supplement will be sent to everyone on Monday, December 6,
1999.

Please send all price source changes, amendments or updates along with
comments on the Introduction and Practice Note to Kianga Ellis at Cravath,
Swaine & Moore by fax on 212 474 3700 by December 15, 1999 with a copy to
me.  After all the changes have be complied consideration will be given to
rearranging some of the reference price sources by region or product as was
suggested at the meeting today.

If you encounter any problems opening the file please contact Corrinne
Greasley by e-mail (cgreasley@isda.org) or by telephone on 212 332 1200 and
a copy will be sent to you by fax.

If you have any questions or comments I can be reached by email at
rpickel@isda.org or by telephone on 212 332 1200.

Thanks again for your assistance in this project.

Robert Pickel
General Counsel

 <<enerlist.xls>>

 - enerlist.xls


FYI - what do you all think?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 08:19
AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 12/17/99 05:29 PM
To: Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Just to clarify, its not the relative age of the production date, but the age
of the event itself.

d.n.

To: George Smith, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Do any of you see a problem with limiting this to the current month or
current month +1
Need to know soon

Scotty

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           12/17/99 03:25 PM

To: Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trisha Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave McMullan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Scotty/Richard,

Our DBAs would like to see what we can do to reduce the qty of rows in
Contract_Event_Status.  We have over 1 Gig of data in that table.  I would
like to suggest we have a nightly or weekly or monthly process to delete any
row with a Last_Mod_Date over a month (or two) old.  So if someone balances
February 1999 this month, we will keep it around for a month (or two).

Does any one else have a desire to keep this data for a shorter/longer period
of time?

This is not an audit table.  This is just a "log" every nom/track/balance/EDI
send/Fax send/sched qty/quick response since the beginning of time.

d.n.


United Way Scholars Press Conference, Today at 10:30 AM!!!!
Come see your United Way dollars at work building the workforce of the future!

Please join Jeff Skilling at a press conference today at 10:30 a.m. in Antioch Park to announce The United Way Scholars Program!  Your contribution is helping to provide 50 local high school students with college scholarships and funding for middle and high school technology programs designed to reach thousands of students each year!

USCAA Track & Field Championships, June 9, 2001
The Enron Running Club is seeking runners, sprinters, discus & shot put throwers, high jumpers and long jumpers to compete in the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  Participate in co-ed track relays & field events for all ages and abilities; showcase your energy and talents in a challenging, competitive, and fun environment; participate in an Enron tradition since 1994; experience teambuilding and camaraderie like never before!  For more information or to sign up, contact Cindy Richardson at x3-4770 or sprint to:  http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html

Dad's Day 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Dad's Day 5K and 1 Mile Family Walk benefiting The Prostate Cancer Research and Awareness scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.  If you're interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

The Caladium plants that are in the huge plant pots throughout the Plaza are going to be replaced and will be available for purchasing TODAY for $4.00 in the Plaza by the up escalator from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m..

Wild@Work Brown Bag: Digging Up the Past:  Archaeology at Armand Bayou
Join Armand Bayou Nature Center Executive Director, Ephriam Dickson, as he explores the prehistoric sites of the Clear Lake area. Discover how archeologists reconstruct past cultures from the artifacts left behind and learn how the first residents of Houston made their living.  [No shovels required.]

When:  Friday, June 8th, 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM
Where:  EB 5C2

Free Opera in the Park featuring Houston Grand Opera's Carmen, June 8-10!
Houston Grand Opera's sensational Multimedia Modular Stage production returns for three FREE performances at Houston's Miller Outdoor Theatre on June 8-10 at 8:30 p.m. Bizet's fiery gypsy Carmen, everybody's favorite femme fatale, ignites the summer in a powerhouse production that had audiences and critics cheering when it was first unveiled in 1998.

Houston Grand Opera's revolutionary Multimedia Modular Stage (MMS), with its giant "live" video screens, hydraulic platforms, and hundreds of rotating, colored lights takes the incredible energy onstage and transports it to the farthest reaches of the outdoor venue with a visceral impact equal to that of a rock concert!

Tickets for the reserved seating will be issued between the hours of 11:30am and 1:00pm through the Miller Theatre box office on the day of the performance.  Any remaining tickets will be issued one hour before the performance.

For additional information, visit HGO's web site at www.houstongrandopera.org. Also see volunteer opportunities below.

JOIN THE VOICES OF ENRON TO EXPAND YOUR COMMUNICATION SKILLS!
MAKE NEW FRIENDS!  EXPAND YOUR HORIZONS! ENHANCE YOUR COMMUNICATION SKILLS!  LOSE THE FEAR OF PUBLIC SPEAKING!  HAVE A GREAT TIME!
Day: Thursdays
Time: 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Location: Enron Building
For more information about The Voices of Enron, contact Melinda Pharms, Vice President, of Education via e-mail at <mpharms@ect.enron.com> or by phone at 713/853-3866 - Internal Extension 33866 or Kathy Willard, Vice President, Membership at kwillar@enron.com <mailto:kwillar@enron.com>, phone No. 713/646-7341 - Internal Extension 67341

Dance for All Ball
No Dance Partner Required!

Saturday, June 9
First United Methodist Church
1320 Main St. at Clay

7-9pm:     Dance Lessons by DanceArts   		 		http://www.danceartsballroom.com
9pm-12:   Dancing! with Live Swing Band. . .Chuck's Trio!

Cover Charge: Minimum $5 Donation
(All Proceeds go towards Building Materials for Red Bird Project which aids the economically disadvantaged & elderly)

FREE CHILDCARE AVAILABLE - Fun kid activities!

For More Info: call 5-6528

Kevin Hannon, Boys & Girls Club board member, invites you to join Enron employee John Cote at a Boys & Girls Club summer camp. John and Kevin are looking for commitments from some dedicated ENRON men & women. SPREAD THE WORD - SPOUSES, FRIENDS & OFFICE COLLEAGUES WELCOME - LAST YEAR'S CAMP WAS A HUGE SUCCESS! Details below:

WHAT: 	2nd Annual Houston Boys and Girls Club Summer Camp Weekend with Enron's incredible volunteers!

WHEN:  	Boys Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), June 22 through Sunday afternoon, June 24
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 20 through Sunday afternoon, July 22

		Girls Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 6 through Sunday afternoon, July 8
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 13 through Sunday afternoon, July 15

WHERE:	Willis, TX (75 minutes from downtown Houston -- just north of Conroe)

WHO: 	6-8 counselors per camp to chaperone 75 kids (ages 7-16)

HOW: 	Share all sports activities, including canoeing, hiking, fishing, organizing a talent 			show/bonfire/ghost stories, obstacle course, water balloon fights, softball, 				basketball, archery, football, etc.  (Cooking and clean-up covered by the Houston Boys & 		Girls Club staff.)

CONTACT:	John A. Cote at ext. 33830

Volunteers Needed for Bring Your Child to Work Day!

Bring Your Child to Work Day is Friday, June 29

Please email Jennifer Milligan if you are interested in volunteering and indicate your preference in the below activities:

Registration Table
Houston Police Dept / Stranger Danger / Fingerprinting
Outdoor Activities (SPCA pets, Balloon King, kids crafts, etc.)
Business Etiquette class
Business Art (kids' resumes, etc)
Lunch ticket sales/coordination (in Antioch Park)

WANTED! VOLUNTEERS FOR OPERA IN THE PARK

Carmen, June 8-10, 2001 @ 8:30pm nightly
Hermann Park's Miller Outdoor Theatre

Following is a list of volunteer duties to be assigned daily.

- Distribution of Stagebill programs with inserts of subscription forms and surveys one hour before the show begins.
- Distribution of giveaways items such as fans and plastic cups prior to the performance.
- Collection of surveys during intermission.

If interested please contact LaShabriel Keys at 713.546.0283 or lkeys@houstongrandopera.org.  Check-in for volunteers will be at 6:30pm nightly at the Volunteer Information Tent near the Miller Outdoor Theatre stage.

(Volunteers will receive tickets in the reserved seating section for the Carmen performance, free food, a t-shirt and a voucher for any matinee during the upcoming Opera season.)

The Enron Running Club and the Houston Corporate Athletic Association are seeking volunteers to assist at the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  There are many volunteer opportunities requiring little or no experience including timers, scoring, lane judges, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees, families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are willing to spend the day benefiting a great cause.  If you are interested or would like more information, please contact Kelly Lombardi at x3-8491.

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday's mailing.


Greg

Thanks for the presentation. We will let you know the acceptance rate.

Neil


Dear PIRA Client:

The following Current News & Analysis articles have been published on PIRA's
website:

1)  April Weather: US And Europe About Normal, Japan Warm
2)  Implications For US Petroleum Demand In 2001 After The Latest DOE
Revisions To 2000
3)  Futures Market Fails To Reward OPEC's Price Achievements

Please go to http://www.pira.com

These articles can be found in the Client section of PIRA's website.  You
will need a PIRA Online acount in order to gain access.  For account
information please contact John Graziano, jgraziano@pira.com

Best regards,

PIRA Energy Group


Ben,

Here is the latest contact list.

Regards,
                James J. Heckler
  Global Energy & Project Finance
  (212) 325-5809
  CREDIT | FIRST
  SUISSE | BOSTON

 <<E2 Investor List.xls>>

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - E2 Investor List.xls


here you go,

tell me what you think.

i spent a lot of time on this


Geir zeroed deal 581368, and added deal 592672. There is another deal
corresponding with this that completes the path from Four Corners to NP-15.
Please let me know if you see this come through.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/25/2001 01:13 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 581368

Can you kill this deal or zero out the volumes?  thanks.

   Kate Symes                04/24/2001 05:27 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 581368

I just spoke with Jesse Bryson in Real Time, and he said this should actually
be 2 buy-resales - one from Four Corners to ZP-26, and one from ZP-26 to
NP-15. Let me know how that sounds to you, and I'll enter the deals.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/24/2001 03:23 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 581368

Should this be NCPA, since we do not have transmission with them.  Or maybe
it should be a buy/resale.  let me know.  Thanks.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Ava-35842/Market Services Council Mtg. conference room 42C2

Date:		5/3/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Janice,

Following your earlier request to Robert for the liquids GTCs, I attach the
latest versions that we have developed.  Apart from a couple of minor
additional comments from London Tax we currently have no further amendments
that we wish to make to these documents.

If you have any queries please feel free to contact Justin or myself.

Kind regards, Edmund.

---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 07/27/99 02:08
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Andrew.Wilkinson@cliffordchance.com                           07/27/99
10:25 AM

To: ecooper@enron.co.uk
cc:  (bcc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT)
Subject:

 <<Petro(CIF).doc>>  <<Petro(CIF).rtf>>  <<Petrochemicals.doc>>
<<Petrochemicals.rtf>>

Please find attached documents as requested.

Kind regards

Andrew Wilkinson

 - Petro(CIF).doc
 - Petro(CIF).rtf
 - Petrochemicals.doc
 - Petrochemicals.rtf