Kevin,

Jeff and Susan are in our tax group and have a question stated below regarding the interconnects to ML7.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Walker/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 02:36 PM ---------------------------
From:	Jeff Blumenthal/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 02:07 PM
To:	Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Susan Musch/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	FW: Sigma Factor Request (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm)

Chris,

Can you let Susan and me know exactly where the ML7 interconnects are located?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	Adams, Matthew; Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn; Moorer, Torrey; Gockerman, Matthew F.; Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Lozano, Melba; Meredith, Kevin; Cass, Robert
Subject:	Sigma Factor Request (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm)

Matt or Frank,

Please provide a sigma factor for the following product type requested by Kevin Ruscitti:

US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm

A US gas transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a Secondary Firm basis.  The Contract Price shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The Period of Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 May 2001. The Termination Date is 31 May 2001.
The Transaction is for delivery at an ANR Pipeline Company ML7 interconnect.  The Purchaser will determine at what ML7 interconnect to take delivery.  The volumes Delivered by the Seller are subject to reductions due to operational constraints on the ANR Pipeline system. In the event that scheduled volumes are reduced due to pipeline operational constraints, Buyer will designate an alternate ML7 delivery location until an unconstrained point is designated.  In the event that the Buyer cannot take receipt at an alternative ML7 point, the Buyer must arrange for the gas to be delivered off-system, stored or parked at the Buyer's expense. These reductions due to Pipeline System constraints are not considered a failure to perform by the Purchaser.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per day.

Thanks,

CW
3-7533


Phillip:

This will confirm the meeting scheduled for 4:00 pm on December 13, 2000.
The meeting will be held in Mark Haedicke's office (EB3325).  Thanks in
advance for your participation.

Jeff


I assume you didn't see this because of the fire wall, so I'm resending.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 09:51 PM
---------------------------
To: MICHELE FARRELL/ENRON@enronxgate @ ENRON
cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, JAY DUDLEY/ENRON@enronxgate@ENRON
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Draft interconnection procedure

Jay--Couple notes:

FERC has stated in several orders what it considers "material changes".  You
may want to look at Duke and Consumers procedures to make sure you are Ok
with the interpretations.  Those are some of the orders that I would look to
should a utility try to kick an Enron project out of the queue for a change.

Also, per your comments on No. 16.  I agree with you on "commenced
construction."  What I mean by "commenced" includes the utility purchase of
easements, etc.  I just want to make sure that the Customer is not agreeing
to live with the FERC outcome, unless the Customer tells the utility to
proceed and agrees to be bound by FERC's decision and agrees to pay the
costs.  [[Customer may want to wait to proceed until it sees the FERC
decision.]]  Thanks.

From: MICHELE FARRELL/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/21/2001 10:33 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: JAY DUDLEY/ENRON@enronxgate

Subject: Fwd: Re: Draft interconnection procedure

Please let me know if you have any feedback to Jay's suggested approach to the
Generation Interconnection Procedures section of the tariff.  I don't want to
file this until I hear that you are in agreement.

-----Original Message-----
Date:  03/18/2001  03:10 pm  (Sunday)
From:  JAY DUDLEY
To:  Christi Nicolay;  Mary Hain
CC:  James Steffes;  MICHELE FARRELL
Subject:  Re: Draft interconnection procedure

Mary, Christi.

Thanks for your good comments on the draft interconnection procedures.
Attached is a memo addressing your comments.

Michele Farrell will have the pen to make the changes and to supervise the
filing while I'm out this week.

Jay.

-----Original Message-----
Date:  03/16/2001  12:28 pm  (Friday)
From:  Jim Eden
To:  Dave Lamb;  Frank Afranji;  Jack Todd;  MICHELE FARRELL
CC:  Gary Lindland;  JAY DUDLEY
Subject:  Re: Comments on Interconnection Procedures

I agree with Dave.  I'd agrue for 120 if I thought I could get away with it.

>>> Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM >>>
Frankly, I am more comfortable with 90 days.  Its easier to complete a
project early and send out the info prior to the due date, then to have to go
back and ask for more time.  Depending on the size of the plant and location,
we may be faced with a lot of checking equipment records and field checks to
verify ratings.  I'll ask Gary Lindland how he feels about reducing the time
line.

>>> MICHELE FARRELL 03/16/01 11:02AM >>>
Any feedback on Enron's comments on our draft interconnection procedures that
Jay sent out last night?  Jay and I are trying to get the DC attorneys on the
phone to incorporate some changes.  In particular, Enron wants us to put in a
shorter time for completing the Interconnection Facilities study (60 rather
than 90 days).  Enron says we would still have the flexibility to take longer
if we notify the customer that we need more time.  How do Dave and Jim feel
about that proposal?


It sounds of interest, but before subscribing, could we see a sample --
perhaps 4th Qtr. '00, if they are unwilling to send a courtesy copy of the
current report?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hu, Sylvia
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Cheek, Charles; Williams, Robert C.; Walls Jr., Rob; Haedicke, Mark
Cc: Siess, Kathy; Obrecht, Paulette
Subject: FW: Legal Billing Report Now Available

Would anyone be interested to see this kind of report?  Should library
subscribe an electronic copy and make it accessible through our portal?
Please advise!

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775

 -----Original Message-----
From:  sales@courtexpress.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-sales+40courtexpress+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:32 PM
To: sales@courtexpress.com
Subject: Legal Billing Report Now Available

Legal Billing Report now available..

CourtEXPRESS has released its Legal Billing Report: Individual Attorney
Billing Rates for First Quarter 2001.

The Legal Billing Report is a comparative listing of hourly rates by
Attorney, firm, year of admittance and region.  The report is sorted by
Hourly Rate (highest to lowest), law firm and region.  The Legal Billing
Report has a subscription base of over 200 firms; including the largest firms
in the country.  Law firms use the report as an indispensable analytical tool
in determining and setting the billable rates for their attorneys.
Consultants and Corporate General Counsel use the report to evaluate their
Outside Counsel.

New this quarter: individual billing rates for consultants at the largest
consulting firms in the U.S.

Available in print ($499) or electronic format ($799)

Be in the know  - stay on top of billing rate trends by ordering the Legal
Billing Report  today!  Simply respond to this email and provide the
following information:

Your Name
Firm name
Address
Telephone
Fax
Email address
Credit card number, expiration date and name on the card
Versions:  Print or electronic format

Thank you.

Chuck Chandler
Vice President of Sales & Marketing
866-391-3320 or 202-628-8217 (direct)
--
CourtEXPRESS.com's Business Development Searches:  Internet Tools to Find New
Clients and to Grow Your Practice.


Agree with the first paragraph.

Bets get tougher from here.  Not so obvious and require much larger size to get same juice.  Generally not a good position considering the current world order, or disorder.  Not much juice in gas basis either.  This is where we see whether we are good traders or just great fundamentalists.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	Arnold, John; Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Zufferli, John
Subject:	FW: schedule C

Is there any truth to my thoughts or am I showing my ignorance?
I appreciate your feedback.

Thanks
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Gorny, Vladimir; Port, David
Subject:	schedule C

Looks like all the schedule C activity, we will make quarterly earnings.  That being said, we've lost a lot of cushion and I predict that fourth quarter we will carry some large VAR going into year end.  Let me know if you think we should revisit limits, particularly if we need to offer up to Lavo and crew the best bet for Enron's risk capital.

As an aside, I think the best bet may be gas.  Regarding gas, I'm thinking the "basis" bet is probably more likely than huge NYMEX bet given current NYMEX level may not have enough juice to provide required profit, this being said both price and basis horizon don't appear to have much trading topography?  In East power, we are dog piling length in the Pennsylvania area, an area without a significant gas fired stacks, shorting the Midwest, net net ending up long.   In the West, shorts are still driving risk and in the words of Chuck Berry -how low can it go? Limbo alone suggest we have to hit the dirt sometime, it is trading sub $40 handle

Frank


Dear Energy Supply/Power Marketing Executive:
The following information includes:

The Supreme Court brief EEI filed May 31 responding to the two appeals that the court accepted, one filed by the New York Public Service Commission, 8 other state commissions and NARUC and the other by Enron.  (attached pdf file)
Background on the litigation and a summary of the main points of the brief.
Listing of recent filings at FERC
5/29/2001 issue of FERC Orders - analyses of significant FERC orders. (attached pdf file)

****EEI's Supreme Court Brief - Background****
The states claim that FERC exceeded its jurisdiction under the Federal Power Act when it held in Order No. 888 that it has jurisdiction  over transmission when it is unbundled from a retail sale of energy, as in states that have adopted retail competition.

Enron, on the other hand, argues that FERC incorrectly concluded in Order No. 888 that it lacks jurisdiction over transmission that is sold as part of a bundled retail sale of electricity, as in states that have not adopted competition and still maintain the traditional service to bundled native load customers.

EEI's brief supports the position taken by FERC in Order No. 888 that when transmission is unbundled from the retail sale, FERC has jurisdiction of the interstate transmission aspect, but that where states maintain the traditional scheme of regulation involving bundled retail sales, the states retain jurdicition over the bundled retail sale.

The main points in EEI's brief are:

The result in Order No. 888 is consistent with all of the language in the jurisdictional provisions of the FPA and with the legislative history of the Act.  While recognizing FERC jurisdiction over interstate transmission, it comports with the statutory language by retaining state jurisdiction over "any other sale of electric energy" and maintains that which was subject to state regulation when the FPA was passed in 1935 --- that is bundled retail sales.

EEI's brief highlights the changes in the industry and the changing uses of the interstate grid.  Order No. 888 also recognizes and accommodates these changes.  We dispute the claim made by both the states and Enron that "unbundling" is just an accounting change that does not change jurisdiction.  The states argue that they always had jurisdiction over transmission when bundled and that unbundling cannot change that.  Enron argues that since FERC has jurisdiction over interstate transmission, the "accounting" issue of whether it is bundled or unbundled cannot eliminate FERC jurisdiction.  Instead, we explain that unbundling at the retail level is a necessary step to implement the fundamental policy made by states when they adopt retail competition.

Responding to the states, we argued that when states make the policy choice to adopt retail competition, unbundling of transmission from energy is necessary to implement that policy.  In order to allow access to transmission by competitive suppliers, FERC jurisdiction over transmission is appropriate.  It is also consistent with the FPA proviso that states have jurisdiction over the retail sales of energy.  The sale of transmission service separately is not a sale of energy,

Responding to Enron, our brief argues that to adopt Enron's argument that FERC should regulate all transmission, even that in a bundled retail sale, ignores six decades of history and judicial interpretation leaving to the states jurisdiction over any transmission sold as part of the retail electricity sale.  Congress has amended the FPA on several occsadions, but has not altered the allocation of federal/state responsibility.

                                == RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  CAISO, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON filed a joint Order No. 2000 Compliance Filing.  RT01-85-000.  Comments due by June 19, 2001.

*  SPP, pursuant to the Commission's March 28, 2001 Order, submitted its RTO compliance filing.  RT01-34-003.  Comments due by June 18, 2001.

*  ENTERGY SERVICES, pursuant to the Commission's March 28, 2001 Order, submitted its RTO compliance filing.  RT01-75-003.  Comments due by June 18, 2001.

*  The following entities filed responses to SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY's Status Report and GRIDSOUTH's Status Report on discussions between themselves pursuant to the Commission's March 14, 2001 Order.  RT01-74-002.  Filed June 1, 2001.

-  GRIDSOUTH
-  SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY-  CALPINE EASTERN
-  NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP.
-  CENTRAL ELECTRIC POWER COOP.
-  ELECRICITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PIEDMONT MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY and the Cities of ORANGEBURG and SENECA, SC

*  PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., SIERRA PACIFIC POWER CO. and NEVADA POWER CO. filed a joint request for clarification of the Commission's April 26 Order granting, with modification, RTO WEST's petition for Declaratory Order.  The issue involves export fees in the rate proposal.  RT01-35-001.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  NEW HORIZON ELECTRIC COOP. filed comments regarding GRIDSOUTH TRANSCO's Order No. 2000 Supplemental Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-002.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. and TAMPA ELECTRIC CO. filed a joint request for approval of a transmission pricing plan that will facilitate the divestiture of their transmission facilities to GRIDFLORIDA RTO.  ER01-2205-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

*  CAISO submitted its compliance filing regarding Demand Response pursuant to the Commission's April 26, 2001 Order.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  NYISO filed a request for authorization to reduce the written notice requirements applicable to meetings of various committees from 7 to 5 days.  ER01-2162-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  The following entities filed responses to the CAISO's May 11, 2001 compliance filing regarding creditworthiness issues.  ER01-889-005.  Filed June 1, 2001.

-  OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
-  ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOC.
-  NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
-  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
-  CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
-  MIRANT CALIFORNIA, MIRANT DELTA and MIRANT POTRERO
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION and RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
-  DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, EL SEGUNDO POWER, LONG BEACH GENERATION and CABRILLO I and II
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

*  LUZ SOLAR PARTNERS VIII and IX filed a request for the Commission to resolve certain outstanding interconnection issues with SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON stemming from the Commission's May 16, 2001 Order.  EL00-95-020, EL00-98-019, et. al.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORP. and PPL ENERGYPLUS filed a joint request for rehearing of the Commission's May 4, 2001 Order which accepted amendments to the modified Reliability Assurance Agreement which has a new method for allocating revenues derived from payments by capacity deficient entities of the capacity deficiency rate to those committing needed capacity.  ER01-1440-002.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  MIRANT AMERICAS ENERGY MARKETING, MIRANT CALIFORNIA, MIRANT DELTA and MIRANT POTRERO filed a joint protest regarding the CAISO's first (May 18) and second (May 25) status reports filed pursuant to the Commission's April 26, 2001 Order.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  WESTERN SYSTEMS COORDINATING COUNCIL filed the Third Amendment to the WSCC Reliability Criteria Agreement regarding procedures to allow the Reliability Compliance Committee to request additional information and modification of the RMS Operating Transfer Capability criterion to change the time period for reducing flows on stability limited paths from 10 to 20 minutes.  ER01-2167-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL filed a response in support of the NYISO's filing for exigent circumstances to implement Automated Mitigation Procedures by June 15, 2001.  ER01-2076-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION and RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES filed an emergency motion requesting expedited consideration of the rehearing requests of the Commission's "Market Mitigation Order".  EL00-95-031, EL00-98-030, et. al.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION filed a request for clarification regarding the Commission's May 16, 2001 Order regarding whether the Order is preliminary or final as to QF issues.  EL00-95-035, EL00-98-034, et. al.  Filed May 31, 2001.

*  ISO-NE filed a request for expedited approval of its Standard Market Design based on the PJM market design.  ER01-2192-000 and EL01-85-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed its Seventy-Fourth Agreement Amending the NEPOOL Agreement which addresses the appeals process by the NEPOOL Review Board and Review Board Code of Conduct.  ER01-2140-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed the approved changes to Market Rule 17 regarding three-part bidding and Net Commitment Period Compensation.  ER01-2144-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  ISO-NE filed a proposal to restructure Installed Capacity as a product and to impose a substantial deficiency charge.  EL00-62-026.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed to expand its membership to ANP FUNDING I, CONSERVATION SERVICES GROUP, DOMINION NUCLEAR MARKETING III and NORTHEAST GENERATION SERVICES CO. and to terminate membership of NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY.  ER01-2193-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

(2) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP. filed an unexecuted Interconnection and Operation Agreement between INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. and DPL ENERGY.  ER01-2163-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  PUGET SOUND ENERGY filed a Blanket Service Agreement for Retail Network Integration Transmission Service, a Retail Network Operating Agreement and a proposed Schedule 4R for its OATT in order to provide energy imbalance service for certain retail customers.  ER01-2149-000.  Comments due by June 19, 2001.

*  METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. d/b/a GPU ENERGY filed a Generation Facility Transmission Interconnection Agreement between itself and the BENTECH GROUP OF DELAWARE.  ER01-2190-000.  Comments due by June 21, 2001.

*  CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. filed a revised Appendix K, monthly facility fee, to the executed Facility Interconnection and Operating Agreement with LUMBERTON POWER.  ER01-1853-001.  Comments due by June 21, 2001.

*  CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. filed a revised Appendix K, monthly facility fee, to the executed Facility Interconnection and Operating Agreement with ELIZABETHTOWN POWER.  ER01-1859-001.  Comments due by June 21, 2001.

*  SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, on behalf of GEORGIA POWER, filed an Interconnection Agreement between GEORGIA POWER and DUKE ENERGY MURRAY.  ER01-2166-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, on behalf of GEORGIA POWER, filed an Interconnection Agreement between GEORGIA POWER and DUKE ENERGY SANDERSVILLE.  ER01-2173-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  MID-CONTINENT AREA POWER POOL, on behalf of its Regional Transmission Committee, filed an Inadvertent Settlement Tariff governing inadvertent interchange.  ER01-2195-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

*  MID-CONTINENT AREA POWER POOL filed long-term firm, short-term firm and non-firm service agreements under MAPP Schedule F with numerous surrounding utilities.  ER01-2189-000.  Comments due by June 21, 2001.

*  MID-CONTINENT AREA POWER POOL, on behalf of its Regional Transmission Committee members subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, filed amendments to Schedule F that incorporate the NERC transmission loading relief procedures for the curtailment of firm transmission, including generation to load service.  ER01-2207-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

*  CALPINE CONSTRUCTION FINANCE CO. filed a motion to intervene regarding CENTRAL MAINE POWER CO.'s Interconnection Agreement between CENTRAL MAINE and CALPINE.  ER01-2032-000.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  ENTERGY filed revisions to its standard Generator Imbalance Agreement involving schedule curtailments, schedule confirmations, billing fees and the timing of preparation of invoices.  ER01-2201-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP. filed an answer to DUKE ENERGY FRANKLIN's motion to intervene regarding AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP.'s filed executed Interconnection and Operation Agreement between COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER CO. and DUKE ENERGY FRANKLIN.  ER01-1900-000.  Filed June 5, 2001.

*  ENTERGY filed revisions to its OATT regarding the portion of the Order 614 Tariff containing the ancillary services schedules 3-6.  ER01-2214-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

*  SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed a response to DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA and ALCOA POWER GENERATING's motions to intervene regarding SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS & ELECTRIC CO.'s revisions to its OATT updating rates, amending Energy Imbalance Service, establishing a charge for exceeding transmission reservation, establishing a Power Factor Correction Service, providing Interconnection Procedures, and adding a dynamic scheduling provision.  ER01-1938-000.  Filed June 5, 2001.

*  MISO filed proposed revisions to its OATT related to the MAPP asset acquisition.  ER01-479-001.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  WOLVERINE POWER SUPPLY COOP. filed a notice of withdrawal of its application to change its Rate Schedule FERC No. 4, Wholesale Service to Member Distribution Cooperatives.  ER01-1815-000.  Comments due by June 20, 2001.

*  ARIZONA INDEPENDENT SCHEDULING ADMINISTRATOR ASSOC. filed a revised Original Service Agreement No. 2.  ER01-2198-000.  Comments due by June 22, 2001.

(3) MARKET COMPLAINTS

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene regarding NSTAR ELECTRIC & GAS' complaint against SITHE contesting market-based rate authority due to market power in the Northeastern Massachusetts Area.  EL01-79-000.  Filed June 4, 2001.

-  SITHE (an answer)
-  ISO-NE
-  MIRANT COMPANIES
-  MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.
-  CALPINE EASTERN CORP.
-  BRAINTREE ELECTRIC LIGHT DEPT., READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPT. and TAUNTON MUNICIPAL LIGHTING PLANT
-  PG&E ENERGY TRADING-POWER
-  POWER DEVELOPMENT CO.
-  CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO.

*  BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION filed a supplement to its May 7, 2001 answer to CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY's complaint against BC HYDRO, POWEREX, MIRANT, the BPA and the LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER claiming that they withheld power during a period of peak demand to create a shortage and raise the price.  EL01-65-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. and PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. each filed answers to the CITY OF VERNON, CA's complaint against the CAISO seeking an order that the CAISO may not require interruptions of VERNON's firm service to customers in order to provide power to other utilities that have chosen not to procure or schedule resources in advance to serve their loads.  EL01-75-000.  Filed June 4, 2001.

*  INDECK MAINE ENERGY filed a complaint requesting fast track processing against ISO NE requesting an Order to require ISO NE to dispatch all available generation before it may impose bid caps or declaring a capacity shortage.  EL01-86-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

(4) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

*  MIDWEST ENERGY filed a request to transfer operational control of its transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-106-000.  Comments due by June 14, 2001.

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., on behalf of WEST TEXAS UTILITIES CO., PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA and SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER CO. filed a request to transfer operational control of their transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-94-000.  Comments due by June 14, 2001.

*  KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO. filed a joint request to transfer operational control of its transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-108-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC CO. filed a request to transfer operational control of its transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-109-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE CO. filed a request to transfer operational control of its transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-111-000.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  UPPER PENINSULA POWER CO. and AMERICAN TRANSMISSION CO. filed a request for authorization to transfer operational control and ownership of UPPER PENINSULA's transmission facilities to ATC.  EC01-105-000.  Comments due by June 18, 2001.

(5) MISCELLANEOUS

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene regarding the WESTERN SYSTEMS COORDINATING COUNCIL, WESTERN REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ASSOC. and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ASSOC.'s proposed merger into a single organization, the WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL.  EL01-74-000 and ER01-2058-000.  Filed June 4, 2001.

-  AVISTA CORP., SIERRA PACIFIC POWER CO., NEVADA POWER CO. and PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
-  PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC.
-  PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

== RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  CAISO, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON filed a joint Order No. 2000 Compliance Filing.  RT01-85-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed an Order No. 2000 Compliance Filing.  RT01-85-000 and RT01-83-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  DESERTSTAR submitted an informational letter briefly outlining its progress towards forming an RTO and requesting that the Commission allow them until June 15, 2001 to submit their Informational Filing.  RT01-44-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

*  SOUTH CAROLINA CONSUMER ADVOCATE filed comments regarding GRIDSOUTH TRANSCO's Order No. 2000 Supplemental Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-002.  Filed June 1, 2001.

*  NYISO filed a request for authorization to reduce the written notice requirements applicable to meetings of various committees from 7 to 5 days.  ER01-2162-000.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed its Seventy-Third Agreement Amending the Restated NEPOOL Agreement which amends Ancillary Service Schedule 2 to reflect a non-$0 Capacity Cost charge in the cost recovery formula.  ER01-2161-000.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  The following entities filed briefs pursuant to the Commission's May 16, 2001 Order Granting Motions for Emergency Relief in Part and Deferring Action on Other Aspects of Motions and Proposed Order Under Section 210(d) Directing Interconnections with Qualifying Facilities and Establishing Further Procedures.  EL00-95-020.  Filed May 30, 2001.

-  COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA and the ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
-  CROCKETT COGENERATION
-  RIPON COGENERATION
-  SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
-  SUNRAY ENERGY

*  The following entities filed responses to NYISO's filing for exigent circumstances to implement Automated Mitigation Procedures by June 15, 2001.  ER01-2076-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

-  H.Q. ENERGY SERVICES
-  NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
-  PPL ENERGYPLUS
-  NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP. and ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
-  MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP
-  An Association of New York State's largest commercial and industrial consumers
-  NRG POWER MARKETING
-  DYNEGY POWER MARKETING
-  Certain MEMBERS OF THE TRANSMISSION OWNERS COMMITTEE of the ENERGY ASSOC. of NEW YORK STATE
-  AQUILA ENERGY MARKETING CORP., EDISON MISSION ENERGY and EDISON MISSION MARKETING & TRADING
-  ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOC.
-  INDECK COMPANIES
-  KEYSPAN-RAVENSWOOD
-  WILLIAMS ENERGY MARKETING & TRADING CO. in support of EPSA
-  INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS OF NEW YORK

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed a motion for clarification regarding the Commission's May 16, 2001 "Further Order on Removing Obstacles to Increased Energy Supply and Reduced Demand in the Western United States".  Specifically, cost allocation issues regarding interconnections.  EL01-47-000 and EL01-47-001.  Filed May 31, 2001.

*  PSEG COMPANIES filed a motion to intervene regarding NYISO's filing for exigent circumstances to implement Automated Mitigation Procedures by June 15, 2001.  ER01-2076-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

(2) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  The following entities filed responses to SPP's revised OATT amendments, which, among other things, accommodate retail access in Texas, include rollover rights like PJM's, and address property rights when locations of firm basis delivery are changed, creditworthiness, and other issues.  ER01-1989-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

-  EAST TEXAS ELECTRIC COOP., NORTHEAST TEXAS ELECTRIC COOP and TEX-LA ELECTRIC COOP of TEXAS
-  GOLDEN SPREAD ELECTRIC COOP. and LIGHTHOUSE ELECTRIC COOP.
-  TENASKA POWER SERVICES

*  BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION filed a motion to accelerate the effective date of the Commission's May 7, 2001 approval of its 2002 Transmission and Ancillary Services Rates from October 1, 2001 to July 1, 2001.  EF01-2021-000.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP. filed a motion to intervene regarding CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT and FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION's notice of cancellation of their joint OATT.  Each had previously filed separate OATTs to replace the Joint OATT.  ER01-2020-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

*  SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER CO. filed and answer to NORTHEAST TEXAS ELECTRIC COOP.'s (NTEC) request for a declaratory order that the cost of upgrading certain transmission grid facilities of the SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER CO. should be rolled in and not directly assigned to NTEC.  EL01-73-000.  Filed May 31, 2001.

(3) MARKET COMPLAINTS

*  SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT filed a Section 206 complaint against CAISO regarding neutrality adjustment charges for the year 2000 which SALT RIVER claims exceed the $0.095/MWh rate cap set forth in the CA ISO Tariff.  EL01-84-000.  Filed June 1, 2001.

== RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  The following entities filed requests for rehearing regarding the Commission's April 26, 2001 Order approving RTO WEST and TRANSCONNECT's stage one Order No. 2000 Compliance Filing.  RT01-35-001 and RT01-15-001.  Filed May 29, 2001.

-  The CITY OF SEATTLE
-  IDAHO POWER CO. and PACIFICORP
-  IDAHO CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITIES ASSOC., IDAHO ENERGY AUTHORITY, MARKET ACCESS COALITION, NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WA and WESTERN PUBLIC AGENCIES GROUP
-  ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
-  DIRECT GENERATION & TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE
-  RTO WEST & TRANSCONNECT

*  CAISO filed its Second Status Report on Implementation of the Mitigation Plan contained in the Commission's April 26, 2001 Order.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed May 25, 2001.

*  The following entities filed briefs pursuant to the Commission's May 16, 2001 Order Granting Motions for Emergency Relief in Part and Deferring Action on Other Aspects of Motions and Proposed Order Under Section 210(d) Directing Interconnections with Qualifying Facilities and Establishing Further Procedures.  EL00-95-020.  Filed May 29, 2001.

-  INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOC.
-  CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
-  RIPON COGENERATION
-  RIDGEWOOD POWER
-  LUZ SOLAR PARTNERS
-  WHEELABRATOR HUDSON ENERGY CO., WHEELABRATOR SHASTA ENERGY CO., WHEELABRATOR LASSEN INC., and WHEELABRATOR NORWALK ENERGY Co.
-  CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL and GOAL LINE
-  CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL and CERTAIN CALIFORNIA QUALIFYING FACILITIES
-  WATSON COGENERATION CO.
-  DYAMIS, INC.
-  COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
-  CALPINE CORP.
-  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

*  The following entities filed responses regarding the Commission's April 26 Order regarding mitigation and monitoring of the CA wholesale market and a western wholesale rate investigation.  EL00-95-012.  Filed May 25, 2001.

-  NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
-  SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-  CITIES OF REDDING, SANTA CLARA and PALO ALTO, CA and the M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION and RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES
-  CAISO-  LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER
-  CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
-  CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY OVERSIGHT BOARD
-  CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC.

*  The following entities filed requests for rehearing regarding the Commission's April 26 Order regarding mitigation and monitoring of the CA wholesale market and a western wholesale rate investigation.  EL00-95-031 and EL00-98-030, et. al.  Filed May 25, 2001.

-  MIRANT AMERICAS ENERGY MARKETING, MIRANT CALIFORNIA, DELTA and POTRERO
-  PPL ENERGYPLUS, PPL MONTANA and PPL SOUTHWEST GENERATION
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
-  AUTOMATED POWER EXCHANGE
-  WILLIAMS ENERGY MARKETING & TRADING CO.
-  DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA and DUKE ENERGY TRADING & MARKETING
-  ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOC.
-  CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
-  CITY OF SAN DIEGO
-  SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-  AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOC.
-  CITIES OF REDDING, SANTA CLARA and PALO ALTO, CA and the M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
-  SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
-  TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  CALPINE CORP.
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER CO.
-  CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
-  CITIES OF ANAHEIM, AZUSA, BANNING, COLTON and RIVERSIDE
-  CAISO
-  The CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY
-  CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC.
-  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
-  CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
-  CITY OF BURBANK
-  LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER
-  METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
-  DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, EL SEGUNDO POWER, LONG BEACH GENERATION, CABRILLO I & II and NRG POWER MARKETING
-  IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION and RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES
-  AVISTA ENERGY

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene regarding CAISO's proposed revision to its by-laws regarding the composition and authority of its Board.   EL00-95-030 and EL00-98-029.  Filed May 25, 2001

-  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
-  ENRON POWER MARKETING and CORAL POWER

*  CAISO filed a response to the request of the CITIES of ANAHEIM, AZUSA, BANNING, COLTON and RIVERSIDE, CA, in response to which the Commission shortened the time period for answers to the CITIES request for clarification of the Commission's April 26 Order regarding mitigation and monitoring of the CA wholesale market and a western wholesale rate investigation.  EL00-95-012.  Filed May 29, 2001.  Comments were due May 25, 2001.

*  The following entities filed responses regarding the proposed escrow account for unpaid bills in the Commission's April 26 Order regarding mitigation and monitoring of the CA wholesale market and a western wholesale rate investigation.  EL00-95-012.  Filed May 29, 2001.

-  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
-  COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA and the ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
-  CITIES OF ANAHEIM, AZUSA, BANNING, COLTON and RIVERSIDE, CA
-  CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
-  METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
-  OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
-  SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-  AVISTA ENERGY
-  RELIANT POWER GENERATION and RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  DYNEGY POWER MARKETING
-  CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
-  POWEREX CORP.
-  NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
-  PUGET SOUND ENERGY
-  CITY OF VERNON, CA

*  NEPOOL filed a request for rehearing of the Commission's April 25, 2001 Order which rejected NEPOOL's proposed confidential information policy provision.  ER01-1398-002.  Filed May 25, 2001.

*  BRAINTREE ELECTRIC LIGHT DEPARTMENT, READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT and TAUTON MUNICIPAL LIGHTING PLANT filed a joint request for rehearing of the Commission's April 26, 2001 Order granting certain market monitoring and mitigation in ISO NE.  ER01-368-002.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed its Seventy-Fourth Agreement Amending the NEPOOL Agreement which addresses the appeals process by the NEPOOL Review Board and Review Board Code of Conduct.  ER01-2140-000.  Filed May 25, 2001.

*  NEPOOL filed the approved changes to Market Rule 17 regarding three-part bidding and Net Commitment Period Compensation.  ER01-2144-000.  Filed May 25, 2001.

(2) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  NERC's Market Interface Committee filed a request for a new OASIS business practice standard regarding accepted but unconfirmed firm daily point-to-point service and reservation timing limits.  RM95-9-013.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. and COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. of INDIANA withdrew their April 20, 2001 filing, which would have amended the generator Interconnection Procedures set forth in Attachment K of COMED's OATT.  ER01-1833-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  AMEREN SERVICES CO. filed a Transmission System Interconnection Agreement and Parallel Operating Agreement between itself and AMEREN ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CO.  ER01-2122-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  AMEREN SERVICES CO. filed a Transmission System Interconnection Agreement and Parallel Operating Agreement between itself and AMEREN GENERATING CO. and AMEREN ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CO.  ER01-2123-000.  Comments due by June 15, 2001.

*  MICHIGAN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CO. filed an unexecuted Generator Interconnection Agreement and Operating Agreement between CONSUMERS and MONTCALM COUNTY RENAISSANCE TRUST.  ER01-2126-000.  Comments due by June 14, 2001.

*  PJM filed an executed Interconnection Service Agreement between itself and MIDDLESEX GENERATING CO. as well as two executed Interim Interconnection Service Agreements between itself and MIRANT AMERICAS ENERGY MARKETING.  ER01-2127-000.  Comments due by June 14, 2001.

*  COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. filed a motion to intervene and support DUKE LEE ENERGY's May 7, 2001 filing of a tariff to provide Emergency Redispatch Service.  ER01-1988-000.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  TXU ENERGY SERVICES CO. and TXU ENERGY TRADING CO. (joinly) and TENASKA POWER SERVICES filed motions to intervene regarding SPP's proposed revised OATT in order to accommodate retail access in Texas, include rollover rights like PJM's, address property rights when locations of firm basis delivery are changed, creditworthiness, among others.  ER01-1989-000.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed a protest regarding the CITY OF VERNON's compliance filing consisting of a revised Transmission Owner Tariff, pursuant to the Commission's March 28, 2001 Order.  EL00-105-004.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. filed comments regarding CITY OF VERNON's revised Transmission Owner Tariff.  EL00-105-004.  Filed May 29, 2001.

*  UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMS filed a request for rehearing regarding the Commission's April 27, 2001 Order accepting with modifications PACIFICORP's revised OATT with changes to energy imbalance and power loss provisions.  ER01-798-003.  Filed May 29, 2001.

(3) MARKET COMPLAINTS

(4) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

*  NIAGARA MOHAWK HOLDINGS and NATIONAL GRID USA filed a joint answer to AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF NIAGARA's protest and request for a hearing regarding vertical market power and control of access to transmission lines involved with the NIAGARA MOHAWK and NATIONAL GRID merger.  EC01-63-000.  Filed May 30, 2001.

*  UPPER PENINSULA POWER CO. and AMERICAN TRANSMISSION CO. filed a request for authorization to transfer operational control and ownership of UPPER PENINSULA's transmission facilities to ATC.  EC01-105-000.  Filed May 25, 2001.

*  MIDWEST ENERGY INC. filed an application for authorization to transfer operational control of certain jurisdictional transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-106-000.  Filed May 24, 2001.

*  KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO. filed an application for authorization to transfer operational control of certain jurisdictional transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-108-000.  Filed May 25, 2001.

*  EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC CO. filed an application for authorization to transfer operational control of certain jurisdictional transmission facilities to the SPP RTO.  EC01-109-000.  Filed May 25, 2001.
_________________________________________________________

Nancy Tarr
Manager, Business Development
EEI Alliance of Energy Suppliers
701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Telephone:  202-508-5680
FAX:  202-508-5600
www.eei.org/alliance

ntarr@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
 - FERC Orders052901.pdf
 - Brief & Appendix No 00-568.pdf
**********
Log on to Our Energy Future ( www.eei.org ) to get the facts on today's issues and learn about solutions we can all take part in.


Carolyn,

Please revised the signature page for escrow instruction to reflect Chris
Calger as a signatory.

Thanks,

Kay


In approximately one month (9/9/2000), we are targeting that a new version of
the Oracle NT client (8.1.6), Borland Database Engine (BDE) 5.1.1 and
Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2.5. to all Corp/ENA workstations.
This software provides the connectivity from your workstation to Enron's
Oracle databases and the applications supported by them.  We are currently in
the process of testing all the applications managed by Corp/ENA Information
Technology to ensure that they will be compliant with this new software.

This change may also effect your own developed MS-Access, MS-Excel
spreadsheets, and/or MS-Query documents that retrieve data from Enron's
Oracle databases via ODBC drivers. As part of the upgrade, all Oracle ODBC
connections will be upgraded to compliant driver versions.

If you would like to test your MS-Access databases and/or MS-Excel
spreadsheets under the new software releases, please use one of the
workstations at one of the following locations for your testing:

General users
EB2230D
EB2778B
EB0504P
EB4857

Traders and developers only please
EB2904E
EB3067
EB3138B

You may contact your floor support representative for any testing assistance.


I think he'd be good.  Do you want me to set up interviews?  MHC

From: Richard B Sanders on 12/03/2000 06:53 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trading Atty.

What do you think about Bill as a trading atty?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/03/2000 06:52 PM -----

	"Bill Gage" <gage@bkollp.com>
	12/02/2000 03:34 PM

		 To: "Richard Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Trading Atty.

Sanders - Anything ever come of that trading job we  were talking about.? I
saw a deal from Prescott the other day looking for a  "electrical trading
atty for an international energy company".? It looked  like the job you were
talking about so I sort of assumed that our discussion was  a non-starter.?
Let me know.? Thanks - Gage
?
William A. Gage, Jr.
Buck, Keenan & Owens,  LLP
700 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas  77002
713-225-4500
713-225-3719 - Fax
gage@bkollp.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/28/99 09:13 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djcustomclips@djinteractive.com                           07/27/99
08:04 AM

Please respond to custom.news@wsj.dowjones.com
To: 94094@mailman.enron.com
cc:  (bcc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Derivatives: Nord Pool ASA-Nordic Power Futures - Week

Nord Pool ASA-Nordic Power Futures - Week

                 NORD POOL ASA-NORDIC POWER FUTURES-WEEK        27/07 09:55
GMT
 SYMBOL BID Z  BID    ASK   ASK Z  HIGH   LOW   PRE CL  LAST  VOLUME  OP IN
GU31-99    20  65.00  65.75    10  65.25  64.50  66.75  65.25     100
3524
GU32-99 ...

Published by: Dow Jones Energy Service
Date: 07/27/1999
Word Count: 122
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 93
Folder Name: Derivatives

Full-text article available at
http://nrstg1p.djnr.com/cgi-bin/NewsRetrieval?cgi=WEB_ST_WC_STORY&DBNAME=DJFIN
&HDAN=NRG9920808404&Search=Derivatives&QID=94094&QT=R&HDSC=NRG

Articles are included at no charge for flat-fee corporate customers. (Under
standard pricing, charges apply.  For details, click the $ icon on the Dow
Jones Interactive home page, located at http://www.djinteractive.com.)
______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 1999 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/28/99 09:13 AM ---------------------------

To:
	Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
From:
	Ernie/HOU/ECT@ECT, ext. 3-0357
Date:
	07/28/99
Subject:	Class Confirmation - Shari Stack

	Shari Stack has enrolled in Effective Negotiating

Class Days and Times:
  9/13/99  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  9/14/99  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
EB552,  Houston
No Show/Participant Fee: $795.00

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.  If you have any questions, please call
the ECT Development Center Team at 853-0357.

Thank you.


Rosalee, just heard back from Mr. Derr's assistant.  Unfortunately, he is
unable to attend. Please delete his name from the  letter/invitation. Thank
you. Chris


Leon, thanks for the list.  If this is a complete list of the parts which are
replaced, what parts are "common" between the 3505 and the 4700?  Bill Scott
is the attorney on this for Enron and I have copied him on this
correspondence  "wcs@modrallcom."  Plese keep him in the loop on this......

"Leon O'Bryan" <OBryan_Leon_L@solarturbines.com> on 08/27/2001 01:51:31 PM
To: <lcampbe@enron.com>
cc: <Rich.Jolly@enron.com>

Subject: Common Parts request

Larry,

The hardware that is replaced during overhauls is:
All Bearings (#1,#2,#3)
All seals #1 brg, IGV & variable stators, #2 brg, #3 brg, #1
nozzle,              #2 nozzle, #3 nozzle
All hardware (nuts, bolts, washers for cases, housings etc.)
All gaskets and packings (air/oil tube, oil drain tubes etc)
All o-rings (oil inlet tubes, etc)

This applies to recoupes and standard engines.  The thing different on the
recoupe is that some of the hardware for the cases is different and the
internal blankets are replaced.

If you have any questions or if I can be of further service, please do not
hesitate to give me a call.

Leon O'Bryan
(801) 352-5100-office
(801) 560-2136-Cell


Please forward electronic copy of letter.  Ed wants to send it to several people (internal).

Thanks

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Daren,

Thank you for the proposal, I look forward to discussing this further with
you over the next week.

Dave

                    "Farmer, Daren
                    J."                     To:     <DyckD@valero.com>
                    <Daren.J.Farmer@        cc:
                    enron.com>              Subject:     Valero RFP Issued June 1, 2001

                    06/29/2001 04:29
                    PM

David,

In response to the RFP you issued on June 1, 2000 for electric power and
natural gas supplies, Enron would like to present the following offers
for your gas supply in Texas:

For deliveries to the Corpus plant:
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
less $.04 for a term of one year.
           or
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
less $.035 for a term of two years.

For deliveries to the Houston plant:
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
less $.005 for a term of one year.
           or
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
flat for a term of two years.

For deliveries to the Clear Lake Plant:
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
less $.005 for a term of one year.
           or
           10,000 Mmbtu per day, priced at Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel
flat for a term of two years.

Under this offer, Enron reserves the right to serve the plants from any
of the pipelines listed under Appendix D:  Table 2 of your RFP (HPL,
EPGTT, Kinder Morgan).  I appreciate your review of this offer.  Please
contact me at 713-853-6905 with any questions or comments.

Thank You

Daren Farmer
Enron North America
Ph:  713-853-6905
Fax:  713-646-2391
E-mail:  dfarmer@enron.com


Thanks Darren, I appreciate it.  We all know how often Enerfin's numbers
change. Chances are we would have had to reverse any entry we made.
Victor

Daren J Farmer
11/02/2000 02:47 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Sorry about this, Victor.  I didn't even pay attention to the date.  I was
thinking this was October business.  We will definitely be able to do
somthing with this on our side and not involve the East Desk.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
11/02/2000 02:06 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn
Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECTCynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

I'm assuming from your answer that this is free gas for HPLC at this point.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/01/2000 06:34 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Is this date really June of 1999?  Hopefully we're not just finding out about
this?

I don't think we can even process this request.  The East Desk was not up and
running on Unify in June of 1999.  All of our pathing for June of 1999 was in
Autonoms and it's not y2K compatabile. With the volumes involved being so
small and the accuracy of the data at Enerfin in question, why don't we let
this volume hit the new OBA at Enerfin as a PPA???

I welcome your thoughts.
Victor

	From:  Cynthia Franklin @ ENRON                           11/01/2000 02:50 PM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Victor,
Can we go this far back? Please advise.
Cindy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000
02:54 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young@ECT
11/01/2000 11:25 AM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Cynthia/Meredith,

Can you please scroll below to my request to Daren regarding 98-0439 and see
if you can assist me w/this request?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:23
AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
11/01/2000 10:16 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Jackie,

Please get with the East Desk on this.  If they agree, we can roll the deal.

D

Jackie Young
11/01/2000 10:03 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Daren,

On the above mentioned dates, there was no nomination at the Enerfin meter.

6/3/99 and 6/8/99 revealed activity for ENA (202K).  Can the deal be extended
for 6/4 (548 dec.) and 6/9 (40 dec.) to cover this flow so that Volume
Management can create an accounting arrangement for these two days?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Mr. Skilling, by studying Enron I've concluded that you, its driving force, are an adventurer at heart, one who loves new ideas, discovering and exploring new worlds of thought, and taking the untried path rather than the proven, overly-traveled one.  That is why I am reaching out to you personally.
As you know, the world is now one huge marketplace uniting many different cultures, attitudes and beliefs.  Never before in the history of the world has there been a greater need for people to embrace diversities with an understanding that our differences can work together to produce profound advantages for all if only we will learn the art of tolerance, acceptance and understanding.  And what company is better qualified to carry this message than the culturally-diverse and wildly-successful workforce of Enron?
I would like to work with Enron in a public relations capacity, traveling throughout the nation and abroad, educating the public about the dangers of intolerant attitudes and sharing the success story of Enron as a lesson in the value of unity.
May I meet with you briefly to discuss my idea, which I am confident will not only improve the lives of those hearing and receiving the message, but will also serve as an excellent investment of public relations dollars for Enron?
I may be reached by telephone at 281-443-2446 or by e-mail at bnreine@yahoo.com .   I hope to hear from you very soon.
Thank you,
Carla D. Harris

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messengerhttp://phonecard.yahoo.com/


Bryant Baker at Bridgeline is asking me to approve this deal so Bridgeline can bill ENA for the storage service.  Normally I wouldn't worry about it but since we are in negotiations with Bridgeline I'm not sure what to do.

Is a confirm generated if I approve this ticket?

Also, when does this deal terminate in the global contracts system?

thx


Jesson -

Since you are too weak to show me a bid, here is an updated term sheet.  See
you tomorrow morning at 9am.

Swank


Mary:
Enclosed is the Counterparty form that we have come up with for Multi-Product
Guarantys.  Depending upon the products that need to be covered, each
Guaranty will need to be modified to make sure that it describes the proper
entities and products.  I will send along the Enron form of this shortly but
please pass this along to the appropriate people in the credit group.

Jeff, Stacy and Harry,
Are you going to change the Physical product form of Guaranty to look more
like this?  Power has changed their form and it may help for us to all be
consistent especially when we are asked to amend an existing Guaranty to
include more products.  If you do decide to amend your form, please send the
new form to credit.

Thanks for everyone's input.

Carol


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg_Hathaway@dom.com [mailto:Greg_Hathaway@dom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Williams, Jo; Miller, Kent; Mercaldo, Vernon
Cc: Gregg_Tyson@dom.com; Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com;
Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com; Stacy_Lee@dom.com; Mark_Moyer@dom.com;
Brent_Cinnamond@dom.com; MLDotter@aol.com; johnwayneking@aol.com; George
Briden; Duane_K._Duclaux@dom.com; Scot_Hathaway@dom.com;
Guy_Chapman@dom.com
Subject: NNG Letter asking for Written Clarifications

Jo, Kent, Vernon:
Good morning!  Hope all is going well in Omaha and Houston.  As we discussed at
lunch in Kansas City we were going to request some information from you in
writing and to that extent please see the attached file.(See attached file:
Northern Letter asking for clarification.doc)

Greg Hathaway
804.273.4421
Virginia Power Energy Marketing (VPEM)
5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Innsbrook 3rd Floor
_______________________________________________________________________________


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Team Leader Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		4/3/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:15 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	Body for Death


PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU ARE COMPLETELY PACKED BY 3:00 PM.  THE MOVE TEAM WILL BE ON THE FLOOR BY 3:00 PM.

ALSO:

1. EMPTY VOICEMAIL
2. TAKE HOME LAPTOPS AND PALM PILOTS, IPAQ'S OR BLACKBERRY'S
3. TO BE HERE AT LEAST ONE HOUR PRIOR TO YOUR NORMAL TIME ON MONDAY MORNING.  THE FLOOR WILL BE OPEN BY 5:00 AM
4.  PACK HEADSETS. (BOX,  BLACK WIRE TO EARPIECE AND BLACK CORD THAT CONNECTS UNDER DESK) ONLY LEAVE GRAY WIRES

LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS  OR IF YOU NEED ANY HELP
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


Great idea.

My key points would be that (a) FERC needs to push ahead with its "right sized" RTOs and (b) focus on standardizing the tariff and market design [no more collaborative efforts].  Two simple, easy to understand thoughts.

Also, I think that it's a mistake to use the term "large RTOs".  We don't want large RTOs.  We want RTOs that cover natural markets and benefit consumers.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shortridge, Pat
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Philipp, Meredith; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Robertson, Linda; Shelk, John; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	RTO week follow up

In the aftermath of RTO week and following up on Rick's successful pre-briefings, we should be out spinning on the back end as well.  Perhaps Sarah, Meredith and I can come up with some thoughts on message points and send them around for comment.  Sound OK?


FYI our 10:30 meeting today

- Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001
06:41 AM ---------------------------

Tony Hamilton@ENRON
04/20/2001 06:35 AM
To: Mike.A.Roberts@enron.com
cc: Tani.Nath@enron.com
Subject: Re: London Status Report - Research Weather

Tony Hamilton
04/20/2001 04:03 AM
To: Stephen.Bennett@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: London Status Report - Research Weather

Hi Mike,

Please find a list of our current daily products and services, together with
identified research projects (to-date) for European Weather research - this
has been forwarded to Tani Nath to aid her recommendations for a 2nd Met. for
London.

1) This week:

* A meeting with James Willis (Agriculture) has been arranged for Monday
afternoon to discuss weather input for Softs.
* Following suggestion from Tani, meeting has been pencilled in with Pierre
Aury (Coal Trading) to discuss  weather input.
* At present we are providing Kristian Lande (Continental Power) with daily
precipitation outlook for Spain - he is working towards getting a daily
weather breifing for Power set up.
* A meeting with Alex McLeish (Global Products) has been pencilled in
following his return from Houston to discuss the way forward in building a
forecast model for Crude API based on HDDs on either side of the Atlantic.
* We have made progress in getting additional information on European Ports
following meeting with Scott Moncrieff and Sylvie Mostura (Shipping and
Transportation) - we now get forwarded daily reports for some Baltic, Black
Sea, Scandanavian, Italian and Indian ports, which include various degrees of
weather information.
* We now supply North Sea conditions and forecasts as a part of the 8am UK
Gas Briefing.
* We've added a midday "update" for UK Gas traders if/when MRF ensembles
warrent changes or clarification.
*Following extremely useful meeting with Tani Nath, it is now clear that need
for 2nd Meteorologist will have to be cleared with her superiors here in
London before moving forward.

2) Still to follow up
* Get meeting with Chris Mahoney to determine if we can provide any
additional support (e.g. daily briefing) for Crude and Products.
* Follow up on a potential morning briefing for Continental Power.
*Get meeting arranged with David Anderson at ECMWF to discuss data products
and services they provide.
*Continue to investigate Model GRIB data to produce a "confidence interval"
for model output.
*Meet with Ross Mcyntire to determine needs from weather drivatives
*Develop a standard hydro product (daily updates) for Continental Power
(Spain specifically)
*Develop Forecast Verification scheme and internal forecasting tools
*Avistar recorded Europe briefings

3) Challenges:

* Still appears to be some confusion over whether we are moving desks this
afternoon or not!
*Karin Ahamer (the team assistant here) is going to verify later exactly
which PCs we will be using from Monday next week (some of the loaner PCs we
are currently using contain important software left over from their previous
users).
* Our time in assembling reports is becoming more efficient on a daily
basis.  However as our product load increases this may become a factor over
next few weeks.

______________

Mike,

We look forward to talking with you and Vince later today!

See you later,

Tony


EES length will be in NP-15 for 04_20.  You can find the length under PGE3
load zone as EES2.
Thanks,
Bill


The report named: Power West P/L <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=28&report_name=Power+West+P/L&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


FYI -  Though Mitch has the  gov't's 4 guiding principles wrong. They are:
protecting consumers, creating a stable business climate, protecting the
environment, and promoting new ways of doing business and alternative
sources  of energy.
----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 05/07/2001 09:03 AM -----

	"Optican, Mitchell E." <OpticanM@state.gov>
	05/04/2001 01:21 PM

		 To: "'Aleck.Dadson@enron.com'" <Aleck.Dadson@enron.com>
		 cc: "Santillo, Patrick" <patrick.santillo@mail.doc.gov>, "Dykeman, Peter"
<peter.dykeman@mail.doc.gov>
		 Subject: Today's Meeting

Aleck,

First, thanks for spending time with us this morning.  I think it was a very
worthwhile meeting.

In your thinking about a scheme to satisfy Harris government political
concerns, please consider that the Premier said on May 1 that he is
insisting that before deregulation four conditions will have to be met over
the next 12 months. These are: a guarantee that consumers will be spared
from sharp rate hikes; a reliable supply of power; adequate environmental
safeguards; and continued support for alternative power sources.

I think we need, therefore, to consider how to freeing up the wholesale
market would not cross these four conditions.  For example, deregulating the
wholesale market would not appear to have any negative impact on
environmental safeguards or continued support for alternative power sources.
It may be that such a deregulation would have a positive impact (I noted in
today's WSJ that ENRON and 4 other companies are calling for CO2 caps).  How
could deregulating the wholesale market "guarantee the consumers will be
spared from sharp rate hikes" and "provide a reliable supply of power"?

I think that any plan for reducing market risk that ENRON could suggest (as
you mentioned, Ontario could contract for future deliveries at a set price)
would seem to meet that requirement.  What needs to be clear is the
mechanism whereby this would be done.

If an alternative plan is then contrasted with the consequences of ENRON
pulling out of the Ontario market and the reciprocity repercussions for OPG
in NY, perhaps the Harris government would have the political cover as well
as the incentive to qualify its May 1 statement to include a November 2001
opening for the wholesale market.

best, Mitch


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
01:47 PM ---------------------------
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

I still don't understand.  But we are net short crude, and Crude, company
wide got longer 1000 contracts yesterday.  This is counter to what you are
saying below... Jeff

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

You are correct, JBLOCK got longer 495K barrels.  However, crude is a huge
hedge component on this deal and net crude position for Liquids is short.
As you can see on the Component VaR graph, with the short position in crude,
it is eating up most of Agg-Liquids VaR.  Therefore, putting on any long
position in products (this includes LPG's) would act as a hedge.

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/07/2000 12:41 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

how did it reduce var if we added to the underlying positions?

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

JBlock does take up some of the VaR for Agg-Liquids; however, it is not a
contributor of VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6.  As matter of fact,
the VaR for JBlock went down.  The component VaR graph below shows that
heating oil was a hedge but no longer as of yesterday.  Gasoil is still a
hedge for Agg-Liquids but the hedge is reduced.

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/07/2000 12:07 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

Where is the mention of J Block hedges.

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 12:04 PM

To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

Liquids desk has a VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6 of  $8.2MM, over
its limit by 3 percent.

The violation was due to heating and gasoil going shorter by 939K barrels.
Essential, shorten the heat/gasoil position reduced the overall net long
products, portfolio causing the crack spreads to widen when crude oil is net
short 5MM barrels.

Furthermore, volatility on crude was up 3 percent with 15 cents upward move
in price.

Christian


The DealBench business case applies but the technology stinks.  We are planning to redesign DealBench with the idea to allow it to integrate with EOL.  The concept is to allow a product to evolve from auctions to principal to specialist based markets.

Short term, GSS can try to use DB.

Regards,
Michael

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Guadarrama, Michael
Subject:	RE: Global Strategic Sourcing Question

Why wouldn't we use the deal bench auction platform ? This provides for open auctions with participants changing their bids in real time, no ?


I just got off the phone with Bill Nissen.  He is at an ABA seminar at which
Paul Archietzel spoke today.  Mr. Archietzel is with the CFTC's Division of
Economic Analysis and (Bill believes) is very involved in rule drafting and
promulgation.

According to Bill, Mr. Archietzel stated in his speech that he believes it
was no accident that Congress referred to "agricultural commodities" (rather
than the enumerated grains and meats) in the CFMA when establishing which
commodities will continue to be subject to full regulation.  Mr. Archietzel
also expressly stated that there is at least a possibility that pulp and
paper would be considered "agricultural commodities" as used in the CFMA.

Obviously, then, the upcoming rulemaking process could be of critical
importance to our pulp and paper business as well as our agriculture
business. We will clearly need to monitor the process very closely, and
strongly consider getting involved in the comment process.

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


I already checked the blue book for the Chicago area and it's exactly the
same as for Houston.  Which means that the prices should be comparable, so
I'll probably try to sell it here first.   I just found out that I should
have the "offer" in a couple of hours.  It's a big mess.  I'll have to tell
you that story later.  My blood pressure surely shot up after talking to the
analyst HR moron.  If you need any help cracking some heads I'm certainly in
the mood for it!!

I'll let you know what I find out.
Robin

Gabriel Monroy
02/05/2001 01:36 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Car

Well,  you are in a good position because you could sell your car but you
don't necessarily have to.  In Enron terms this would be called a put option
and we charge for it, so make sure you pay me premium.    The actual
paperwork takes no time. It could be done in a day. Now, if your question was
the time that you can actually find a potential buyer....well, that really
depends on how much you want for it.  Have you decided on a  "floor".  In
other words, decide how much is the minimum you would accept for your car.
Another thing I would do is check the prices in Chicago.  Prices for cars
vary a little  depending on the city. So see if comparable cars in Chicago
are selling for less, that way, it might be a good opportunity to try to sell
it here.  SInce you don't have to sell it, I would check the market very very
well.  You don't need the money, and you don't need to sell it. You have the
power. If you decide to advertise it,  don't mention anything about Chicago.

I'll help you with research later.

Gabriel


just got into the office..assume you got the bill that Bruno faxed


No, a transaction had been entered into, the Master Agreement to govern it
was signed, getting the certificates was one of the requirements under the
agreement.


I cannot imagine a shirt larger than the one you received.  Yikes.  Sounds
like Neil still has a chance for a new shirt.

We'll have to allow extra time next Monday for a double de-brief.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole on 03/19/2001 09:46 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Withdrawal

Must confess that it's a bit wierd with you not being here.  Although we've
talked on the phone, I''ve ginda gotten used to having a face-to-face weekend
debrief each morning to let my coffee kick in.

PS  Scott also got thw rong shirt size from A&K, he wears XXL and is
disappointed he only got a XL.  I sure hope that they got JD's size right.
I'll have to check with Lance and see what he got.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


I will be out of town on January 19, so Brenda Herod has agreed to make the
presentation for Rick Causey.  Please replace my name with hers for all
communication regarding this Analyst Orientation.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 06:49 PM
---------------------------

	Tracy L Arthur

	01/08/2001 04:33:19 PM

To: Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Stewart Seeligson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/enron@EnronXgate
cc: Kimberly Nelson/OTS/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Downes/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Tracy Williams/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Hutton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ana Alcantara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cherylene
Westbrook/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Analyst Orientation Business Unit Presentations

Thank you all for agreeing to participate with the Analyst Orientation -
Introduction  Enron's Businesses presentations.  The presentations will be
conducted on the dates and times listed below, as previously scheduled.  All
presentations will take place at the Doubletree Allen Center in the Dezavala
room.

If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel
free to contact me at 713-345-7853.

Thank you again,
Tracy Arthur
Communication Specialist

LOCATION:
Doubletree Allen Center
Dezavala Room

THURSDAY, JANUARY 18
ETS  Dan McCarty  Thursday, January 18 9:15 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.
EA  Dave Delainey  Thursday, January 18 9:45 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.
ENW  Louise Kitchen  Thursday, January 18 10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
EIM  Rodney Malcolm Thursday, January 18 11:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
Trading Simiulation -
  Colleen Sullivan Thursday, January 18 1:30 p.m. - 2:00 p.m.
EEL  Paul Chivers  Thursday, January 18 2:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
EGM  Jeff Shankman  Thursday, January 18 2:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
EGA  Rebecca McDonald Thursday, January 18  3:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
EES  Dan Leff  Thursday January 18 3:45 p.m. - 4:15 p.m.
EBS  Stewart Seeligson Thursday, January 18 4:15 p.m. - 4:45 p.m.

FRIDAY, JANUARY 19
Global Finance  Andy Fastow Friday, January 19 8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
Commercial Services Sally Beck Friday, January 19 9:00 a.m. - 9:15 a.m.
Global Technology Beth Perlman Friday, January 19 9:15 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.
Tax   Ed Coats Friday, January 19 9:30 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.


Darrell,

I put your laptop in the bottom drawer on the left side if you are facing your computer.

Thanks,
Christine


Attached is a revised version of the capital charge presentation.  Several clarifications have been made based on issues raised by various business units. One of the more significate is that Cummulative Translation Adjustment will be excluded from Equity.

Cash flow will now include the change in all intercompany balance sheet account - Hyperion lines 0051, 0052, 0037, 0038, 0218, 0486, 0516, 0517, 0660, 0661, 0878, 0901, 0915, 0936 and 0941.  This should simplify the cash flow when cash transfers are made between companies and when intercompany dividends and contributions are made.

Steve Schwarzbach is working on the template to calculate the capital charge for the restated plan.  He will be sending this out on Tuesday.  I have added a slide with the Hyperion lines that I think are need in calculating the Total Capital.  Please let me know if I have missed anything.

Please let me know if you have any questions, issues, etc.


cold front moving into the mid continent  on tuesday of next weekend reaching the east coast by the weekend. to give you an ideal of the cold, tuesdays forcast for el paso is 62-37(hi-lo), weather channel  forcast calls for thu-ri clear, temp range 69-46 with winds out of the south at 12, and the moon should be at about 70%

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com;
cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: FW: Buck

Hey Joe...how bout one of your on-the-money long term forecasts for next
week, focusing on the weekend. Highs, Lows, and wind direction, please.

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: FW: Buck

I WAS TRYING TO POINT OUT THAT ERIC IS STARTING TO SOUND LIKE MICHEAL

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com;
cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: FW: Buck

Joe...this picture was sent from the guy who shot the deer, to Mathew
Zander...Zander connected the guy with Mertz, who placed them on the
"home" property.

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:58 AM
To: Erik Wollam; Brian Constantine; knipe3@msn.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: FW: Buck

How did Mertz email us from Erik's email address?

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:45 PM
To: brianc@saltgrass.com; knipe3@msn.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com;
cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Parks, Joe
Subject: Re: FW: Buck

Never mind, I pulled it up. Not Booger. We have deer like that, we just
need
to go hunting so we can shoot some of them....e.

>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
>To: <erwollam@hotmail.com>, <knipe3@msn.com>,
<kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com>,
><cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com>, <joe.parks@enron.com>
>Subject: FW: Buck
>Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:34:32 -0600
>
>This is
>sick...wrong...stupifying...disconcerting...unbelievable...incredulous.
.
>..very fishy....overall, a GREAT DEER!!!! Must be the protein!!!
>
>
>PIG
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: CREW LAND RESEARCH [mailto:crewland@swbell.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:09 PM
>To: Brian Constantine
>Subject: Fw: Buck
>
>Brian, Here is what a mertz ranch trophy deer looks like, shot by my
>friend
>on Michaels Home Place right down the road from you all! Of course he
>shot
>it off his front porch!
>M and C Zander
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kevin Gilliland" <gilliland@marsltd.net>
>To: "Matthew Zander" <crewland@swbell.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:58 PM
>Subject: FW: Buck
>
>
> > Matthew,
> >
> > Thought you might want to take a look at this one, its a cull buck
off
>our
> > lease.  I shot him with my kids last weekend.  Where are you hunting
>this
> > year, are you still on one of Michaels leases.  Take Care.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kevin C. Gilliland, Psy.D.
> > St. Paul Professional Bldg II, Ste 807
> > 5939 Harry Hines Blvd.
> > Dallas, TX 75235
> > gilliland@marsltd.net
> > (214) 879-6534
> > (214) 905-1998 Fax
> > (972) 898-5238 Mobile
> >
><< FamilyBuck.ipg.jpg >>
><< FieldBuck.ipg.jpg >>
><< Luke.ipg.jpg >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Mark:

I'm not sure who should respond to this --

Leslie
---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------
From: Donna Greif on 02/29/2000 06:17 PM
To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Contact Enron

Was wanting more details on penalties for EnronOnline.  I was only able to
refer him to Legal.

I had passed on your name and told Jim, either you or someone from our legal
department would
follow up with him.

Thanks for your help!

dg
---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Greif/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 06:12
PM ---------------------------

ExternalUser@enrononline.com on 02/27/2000 01:19:00 PM
To: help@enrononline.com
cc:  (bcc: Help)
Subject: Contact Enron

redir = http://www.enrononline.com/home?ID=ContactConfirm
ContactEmail = jmmcarthur@duke-energy.com
submit = Submit
other = on
from = ExternalUser@enrononline.com
subject = Contact Enron
to = help@enrononline.com
host =
CompanyAddress =
ContactPhone = (801)531-4409
CompanyName = Duke Energy (SLC)
Comments = I would like to see, in writing, the penalties associated with
failure by Enron or the parties doing business on EOL for particular gas
trading points.  I have heard verbally from the Calgary office what they
consider the penalties to be, however, I haven't seen anything in writing.  I
assume that unless parties have agreed to these stated penalies, the
penalties would then fall under existing trade agreements.   Is this correct,
and is Enron working on specific penalty provisions for EOL deals?
ContactName = Jim McArthur
sendETA = on


CUSTOMER SERVICE:
For any delivery problems, or changes in address,
simply e-mail CustomerService@energyintel.com
Please be sure to include full subscriber/company name and
address in your e-mail.

For more information on EIG, visit www.energyintel.com

VIEWING .PDF DOCUMENTS:
Use the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view an attached
.PDF document in its full graphic format, that
is, exactly as it is printed. If you don''t have
Adobe Acrobat Reader installed, you can download
it from the internet: http://www.adobe.com
Follow the links at Adobe''s web site to Acrobat Reader.
Once Acrobat Reader is installed, save the .PDF
document to your disk, open Adobe Acrobat Reader
and then open the .PDF document.
*******************************
Copyright (c) 2001 EIG, Inc.
Reproduction in any form (photostatically, electronically,
or via facsimile), including via local- and wide-area
networks, is strictly forbidden without direct
licensed permission from EIG -- contact
Sales@energyintel.com.
Indirect authorization to photocopy individual
articles or other items for internal and personal
use is granted by EIG provided that the
appropriate fee is paid directly to Copyright
Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923.  Tel: 1-978-750-8400.

 - ng010611.pdf


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022722.txt


Kay,

 Here is the most recent scope of work document b/w FCE and ENA.  Thanks.

Stephen
x 33890


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Julia / Danny Staff Meeting in video room EB49C2

Date:		9/4/2000
Time:		8:15 AM - 9:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


1-888-385-5669; host #7688234

Rebecca C. Medley
(954) 768-8230
Assistant to Debbie M. Orshefsky
and Frank Schnidman

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's       Interest Rates   US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%       [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  Japanese Forex Trading Preview  January 28, 7:00 PM: EUR/$..0.8609 $/JPY..133.53 GBP/$..1.4091 $/CHF..1.7077  Japanese Forex Trading Preview  by Darko Pavlovic  At 6:00 PM December Unemployment rate 5.6% vs. 5.5% in November. At 6:50:00 PM Japan December Ind.Prod. (exp 2%, prev -1.7%)  Japan December unemployment rate rose to a record high of 5.6% from 5.5% in November. The number of unemployed rose to 3.37 million. Japan Dec wage earners' spending fell 4.4% y/y and jobs to applicant ratio is down 0.51 from 0.53 in Nov. USD/JPY did not react to news hovering around 133.55 yen. The greenback is up vs. the yen after falling to a low of 133.20 overnight. Speculation of ratings downgrades is also likely to pressure the yen in the immediate future. December Preliminary Ind. output rose 2.1% from November. Oct-Dec Prel. Output fell 2.3% from the previous quarter, 4th straight qtr of decline. Japan Jan manuf. output seen up 1.4% m/m amd Feb manuf. output forecasted to raise 0.6% m/m. Japan Meti repeated ind output in declining trend. Japan's Lower House budget committee passed a Y2.5 trillion deflation-fighting supplementary budget Monday.The second extra budget for this fiscal is aimed to help finance a Y4.1 trillion spending package and support the economy in the outcome of the Sept. 11 attacks. The budget will also help PM Koizumi to speed up much-needed structural reforms. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, now President of Harvard University told PM Koizumi that he fully supports implementation of structural reforms. Summers spoke with Koizumi about the current situations of the forex markets the world economy.Upside capped at 134.50, 134.90 and 135.30. Support stands at 133.50, 132.80 and 132.40.   The dollar held the European currencies near their 6-month lows, but gave up ground to the yen as a result of the gains in its cross-pairs. As an indication of the dollar's strength, the US Dollar Index soared to 120.35, just shy of its 15-year high of 121, but later eased down to around the 120.0-level.    EUR/USD climbed to 86.10 after plunging to a fresh 6-month low of 85.73 in spite of a better-than-expected rise in the German Ifo business climate indicator that rose to 86.3 in January from an extrapolated reading of 85.8 in December. In response to the third monthly rise in the index, Ifo Chief Nerb commented that German appeared to be in the early stages of a recovery, and urged the European Central Bank to continue to lower interest rates to ensure a recovery. The single currency was likely pressured as well by the rise in M3 to 8% in December, and the gain in the M3 three-month moving average to 7.8% in December from the previous 7.4% and well above the inflation target of 4.5%. Nonetheless, the ECB has tended to brush aside the surges in M3 by explaining them as irregularity, though it does create concern whether upward price pressures will deter the central bank from easing monetary policy. Resistance is viewed at 86.60, 87.0 and 87.50. Support is seen at 85.55-- the 71.8% Fibonacci retracement of the move from 82.25 to 95.95, backed by 85.0 and 84.50.   Economists forecasted that tomorrow's release of the Conference Board Consumer Confidence index will rise to 96.9 in January from the previous 93.7, boosted by an increase in consumer expectations. Should the confidence survey surprise even more on the upside, the dollar will likely reap gains from the data that foretells a promising economic outlook.    Other major US data due for release this week include durable goods, real GDP, the FOMC rate decision, jobless claims, employment cost index, personal income and consumption, Chicago Purchasing Managers survey, labor market report, University of Michigan confidence survey, and ISM Purchasing Managers Index.   In addition to President Bush's State of the Union address, tomorrow marks the first day of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy meeting. The majority of analysts have concluded that the Fed is unlikely to cut interest rates when the FOMC unveils its decision Wednesday afternoon, especially after Greenspan adjusted his remarks about the economy with a more upbeat tone.  Key Eurozone indicators consist of Italian foreign trade, French INSEE industry survey, Italian PPI, Euroarea retail sales, German CPI, French unemployment, French current account balance, Euroarea manufacturing PMI, Euroarea HICP, balance of payments, German PMI, French PMI, French INSEE household survey, Italian PMI, Italian CPI and Spanish unemployment. Economic data from the UK comprise the Gfk consumer confidence survey and the purchasing managers survey for manufacturing. Highlights from Japan comprise the labor force survey, the household survey of expenditures, industrial production, Shoko Chukin small firm survey and employment survey.    	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis USD Retreats Ahead of Data Flood       Articles & Ideas  How Will the Dollar Fare Amid the Data Barrage?   ECB: One More Cut       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		  This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .   Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information.


Hey Jeff,

The Associate & Analyst Program is trying to confirm who is doing the presentation at all of the schools.

I have blocked the dates on your calendar with Jennifer Burns, per your request.  Just wanted to confirm with you if these dates are good for you.

Please let me know at your earliest.

Thank you,

Paul LeBeau


596368 - changed to powerex

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/30/2001 02:15 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

596368
broker has powerex


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000
06:36 AM ---------------------------

Matt Besch <m_besch@yahoo.com> on 11/20/2000 08:32:23 PM
To: Mike.Carson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re:

po box 4962
key west, fl 33040

why??

--- Mike.Carson@enron.com wrote:
> What is your address??
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


- Notice of name-email change.doc


Stinson,

No problem.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
07/12/2000 11:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Giuseppe cell phone

Vince,

Can I loan to Giuseppe my cell phone for the summer?

Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Samer Takriti@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 06/28/2000 10:49 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Trading Feature Set

I will be on the call. I may disconnect around 4:00 to attend the traders'
daily meeting.
A couple of issues:
1. Would it be possible to get Gappy a cell phone for the summer? He does not
have a phone at home. I think the reason for avoiding installing a phone in
his apartment is the increasing cost of his Houston stay.
2. It is getting noisier here. Gappy and I are wandering if we could get
office space downstairs (that we share). We will maintain presence on 44, but
we will be able to discuss when needed.
-Samer


Bob,

I found the warranty deed but I could not find the title policy.  I will call the title company that we used to get a copy today.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <wise.counsel@lpl.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	Re: Huntley/question

Phillip,

Have you found the title policy?

Thanks,

Bob Huntley

----- Original Message -----
From: <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>
To: <wise.counsel@lpl.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Huntley/question

> I will try and find my title policy this evening.
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>      From:   "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <wise.counsel@lpl.com>@ENRON
>      Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
>      To:     Allen, Phillip K.
>      Subject:  Huntley/question
>
>
>      Phillip,
>
>      Could you please do me a favor?  I would like  to read your current
>      title policy to see what it says about easements.  You  should have
>      received a copy during your closing.  I don't know how many  pages it
>      will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy  made.
>      I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for  you.
>
>      Thanks,
>
>      Bob Huntley
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>


FYI - I responded to Sharron.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 05:32 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           08/23/2000 05:33 PM

To: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Info for Accounting Offsite

RSVP:  Yes, I will attend.  I will arrive in San Antonio in time for the
dinner on Tuesday evening.  Count me out for golf on Wednesday - I don't
think they would want me to play!

Breakout Sessions:  SAP Reporting Issues
        Analyst/Associates Program
        (I will be glad to participate in any of the sessions, if there are
needs to move anyone around)

Top 4 Objectives for Accounting Group:  Streamline close process
(from a Non-Accountant!!)     Implement data warehouse for flexible reporting
        Increase visible participation in Analyst and Associate recruiting
and          rotations
        Asssure efficient service from COE (or its replacement),
         providing timely, creative solutions and an extremely high
degree of excellence

Dietary/Special Needs:    Something chocolate for dessert!!!


Version 2 is a shortened presentation.


Shirley,

Please, forward my bio to Crystal.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Crystal Barry <CBARRY@IIRLTD.CO.UK> on 02/09/2000 05:05:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Real Options Conference

Dear Vince,

As the above event is drawing closer, I thought I would write a quick email
to finalise a few things with you.  I understand that you would like a guest
to attend, please can you let me know their name and job title.  Also, if you
could send me your conference checklist I would appreciate it, so that I can
finalise details with my audio visual company.

In the meantime, if there is anything I can do for you, please do not
hesitate to let me know on 0171-915-5116.

Kind Regards
Crystal


Andy, that's very helpful.  I hope that as technology improves and the notion of "web services" becomes more widely accepted as a substitute for "behind the firewall" applications, the opportunity exists for Kiodex to serve the broader universe of customers.  But I agree that there should be lots of low-hanging fruit among the many users of derivatives for whom trading is not a core activity.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy.Zipper@enron.com [mailto:Andy.Zipper@enron.com ]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:26 AM
To: sgross@warburgpincus.com
Subject: RE: Conagra is our newest beta customer!
Stewart,
I base my opinion on 15 years trading and marketing risk management
products to corporations. When I was at Bankers Trust, every corporation we
dealt with would ask after completing a deal "can you tell us where we can
get a cheap off-the-shelf system that we can use to manage these things ? "
The problem KioDex has is exactly what you describe: with companies that
where trading of derivative products is core to their mission, the third
party ASP model is an extremely difficult one to sell. There are all the
obvious reasons: security, reliability, continuity etc... What Kiodex needs
to focus on, in my opinion, is the intersection of customers who need the
product but don't view the function as critical to their operation.
For what it is worth.
Andy