---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
12:28 PM ---------------------------

Carlos Giron <cgiron@mindspring.com> on 03/14/2001 04:43:23 PM
To: Glenn Bohan <gbohan@home.com>, Darron C Giron <dgiron@enron.com>, Brian
Subieville <BSubie@aol.com>, Lola Savannah <lola@pdq.net>, Michael Massimi
<massimi@hotmail.com>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: NIke iD shoes]

Return-Path: <grant.w@mindspring.com>
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.243]) by
walker.mail.mindspring.net (Earthlink Mail Service) with ESMTP id
tavp3f.39ar.37kbi73 for <cgiron@mindspring.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:36:47
-0500 (EST)
Received: from b6jqv (pool-63.52.61.92.atln.grid.net [63.52.61.92]) by
maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12331 for
<cgiron@mindspring.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:36:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <004801c0acdf$d9f0df20$5c3d343f@b6jqv>
From: "grant whipple" <grant.w@mindspring.com>
To: "Carlos Giron" <cgiron@mindspring.com>
Subject: Fw: NIke iD shoes
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:37:58 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01C0AC9C.BEE79EA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Barnett, Linda
To: Becky Runge (E-mail) ; Buckli Stanga  (E-mail) ; Chris  White (E-mail) ;
Eddie Barnette (E-mail) ; Eddie Whipple  (E-mail) ; Grant Whipple (E-mail) ;
Gseaman590308010 (E-mail) ; Hutchison,  Karen ; Ric  Mora (E-mail) ; Virgil_
Barbara and Family (E-mail) ; Seaman, Gary  C.
Cc: Hatch, Mary C. ; Ribera, Cindi  L.
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: FW: NIke iD shoes

-----Original Message-----
From:  Humphrey, Autumn B.
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:52  PM
To: Greg Wines; Barnett, Linda; Carpenter, Tanya K.;  McKay, Scott A.
Cc: jjjk@aol.com
Subject: FW:  NIke iD shoes

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn A  Miller [mailto:glennmill@juno.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:03 PM
To: JanetMoshier@cruisesinc.com; Piponi@aol.com; kperry@family.net;
rosscott@pacbell.net; Tishndic@gateway.net; budsteffen@earthlink.net;
ABHUMPHR@scwater.com;  Schneblyw@cs.com; syndeelynn@Yahoo.com;
jejenkins@earthlink.net; SRush22529@aol.com; Lindsey444@aol.com;
melita_miller@sbcss.k12.ca.us;  Kcromp3011@aol.com; TSchofi527@aol.com
Subject: Fw: NIke iD shoes

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Terri Harry <tpharry@flash.net>
To: Undisclosed-recipients:;
Date: Fri, 09 Mar  2001 09:02:12 -0800
Subject: NIke iD shoes
Message-ID: <3AA90C94.74BC2CE2@flash.net>

Hi
If you've aleady received this, my  apologies. On the other hand, if not,

please read and forward around the world.

Nike now lets you personalize your shoes by submitting a word or  phrase
which they will stitch onto your shoes, under the  swoosh. So Jonah
Peretti
filled  out the form and sent them $50 to stitch "sweatshop" onto his
shoes.

Here's the responses he got... fun and games with Nike...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled for one or more of the  following
reasons:

1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark
2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we  do not
have
the legal right to  use
3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want  any
personalization?
4) Your  Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and
besides,
your mother would slap us.
If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new  personalization
please visit us again at  www.nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Greetings,

My order was canceled but my personal NIKE iD does not violate  any of
the
criteria outlined in  your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC
USA
running shoes was the word  "sweatshop."
Sweatshop is not:
1) another's party's trademark,
2) the name of an  athlete,
3) blank, or
4)  profanity.

I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor  of the
children that made my shoes. Could you please  ship them to me
immediately.

Thanks and Happy New Year, Jonah Peretti

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled because the iD you have  chosen
contains, as
stated in  the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang".
If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new  personalization
please visit us again at nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom  ZOOM XC
USA
running shoes.  Although I commend you for your prompt customer service,
I
disagree with the claim that my personal iD  was
inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's  Dictionary, I discovered

that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not  slang.

The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed  for
long
hours at low wages and  under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates
from  1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your
first
email.

Your web site advertises that the NIKE iD program is "about  freedom to
choose and freedom to express who you are." I  share Nike's love of
freedom
and  personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it
done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build  my
own
shoes, and my personal iD  was offered as a small token of appreciation
for
the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I  hope that
you
will value my  freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to
reject
my order.

Thank you, Jonah Peretti

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the  NIKE iD
web
site that "Nike  reserves the right to cancel any personal iD up to 24
hours
after it has been submitted". In addition,  it further explains: "While
we
honor most personal iDs, we cannot honor every one.
Some may be (or contain) other's trademarks, or the names of  certain
professional sports teams, athletes or  celebrities that Nike does not
have
the right to use. Others may contain material that we consider
inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our  products.
Unfortunately, at times this obliges us to  decline personal iDs that may

otherwise seem unobjectionable. In any event, we will let you  know if we

decline your personal iD, and we will offer you the chance to  submit
another." With these rules in mind, we cannot  accept your order as
submitted. If you wish to reorder  your NIKE iD product with a new
personalization please  visit us again at www.nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for the time and energy you have spent on my request.  I have
decided to order the shoes with a different iD,  but I would like to make
one
small request. Could you please send me a color snapshot of the
ten-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes?

Thanks,
Jonah Peretti

As one forwarder writes:

... this will now go round the world much farther and faster  than any of
the
adverts they  paid Michael Jordan more than the entire wage packet of all

their sweatshop workers in the world to do...

I normally avoid making a plea to pass on these things,
but this time I say:

JUST DO IT

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno  offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join  Juno today!? For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


We have no way to input a storage deal for Cilco.  The way that the contract
is set up, does not fit into the systems as they are.

D

   Aimee Lannou                02/04/2000 09:31 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Grant, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cilco Storage Withdrawal

Daren - Can you set up a deal for the Cilco withdrawal for Dec. 99 going
forward?  I know a deal has never been set up for this but volume management
wants a deal set up so they won't have to set up an accounting arrangement
evey month.  Please let me know, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.

Aimee


El Tiempo around 6 tonight?

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture -- Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:36 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Cc: January, Steve; Zadow, Raetta; Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: Receipt Points

	Bob, you are correct in your statement.  But I want to be sure Koch understand
	when they nominate their receipt at Carlton of 2828 the delivery on that
	path will be 2828 less fuel.  Otherwise I agree with you statements.  I will
	be out next week, but Raetta is up to speed on this issue if you have any
	questions.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Blair, Lynn
Subject: FW: Receipt Points

Lynn:  Please verify that if Koch realigns their 35,000/d contract (K# 20510)such that their MDQ at Carlton matches their Carlton flow obligation of 2,828 and has the rest of their 32,172/d at Marshall (They would need to realign 30 mcf from Carlton to Marshall to effectuate the above, and I've checked with Doug Aschwege to make sure he would approve it.) that Steve's and my interpretation as described below is correct.  Basically the question is whether the Carlton flow obligation is only the Tariff stated volume (ie., no fuel imputed) and that the remainder of the MDQ plus fuel on the whole 35,000/d will flow as primary firm receipts at Marshall.  Thanks for your help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Steve (EKT) [mailto:Steve.Phillips@entergykoch.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Subject: Receipt Points

Bob,

Per our conversations earlier this month,  My contract 20510 needs to have
only 2828 mmbtu at Carlton and 32172 at Marshall.  All of the fuel for the
transport needs to be taken from Marshall.  Currently, this contract has
2858 at Carlton.  This is 30 above my obligation.  After this change is
made, it is my expectation that under no circumstances will my volume at
Carlton be curtailed below a receipt volume of 32568 at Marshall.   A
combination of 2828 plus 32568 gives me a delivered volume of 35000.  That
is my firm entitlement and curtailments below that are unacceptable as long
as my nominations are primary FT.

Please contact me at 713-544-4017 if more clarification is needed.

Thank you.

Steve Phillips


Approved.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bollinger, Joni
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:58 AM
To:	Kirk, Steve; January, Steven; Blair, Lynn; Dornan, Dari; Lagerstrom, Karen; Miller, Kent
Subject:	CAF for UCU SBA

Please reveiw the attached and return your comments/approval to me by Friday, August 31.  Thanks!

 << File: SBAprovider7-01.doc >>

Joni Bollinger
NNG Marketing
phone: (402) 398-7427
fax:      (402) 398-7413
joni.bollinger@enron.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron on 11/27/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Deb Cappiello                           11/21/2000 09:44 AM

To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Bischoff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Armstrong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, /ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Branney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Fowler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Connie Hook/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Mason/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny
McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Nielsen/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frank Oldenhuis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Semin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Neal Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G
Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, LD Stephens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, India
Torres/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Phone List Attached

---------------------- Forwarded by Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Deb Cappiello                           11/21/2000 09:41 AM

To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Bischoff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Armstrong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, /ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Branney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Fowler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Connie Hook/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Mason/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny
McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Nielsen/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frank Oldenhuis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Semin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Neal Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G
Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, LD Stephens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, India
Torres/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Phone List

 Additions:  Jan Moore, India Torres -
 Changes:  Passcode No. for morning/weekend conference no.


no thanks necessary - you have done a great job - now keep it up.  The courts are going to rule if some bonuses can be paid out - there are no guarantees, so I would not count on them approving it.  They are supposedly negotiating to have us stay on 5 & 6.  Nothing really new on those fronts.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Edward
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:14 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: New news

There were a few more questions that I had about the new developments but i figured it would be easier than going to a conference room to talk about it...

First of all, i am glad that i get to remain in this group of people...i think that there could be plenty of good opportunities surface from this.  Second, i appreciate you, or whoever it was that chose me, having the confidence and faith in my ability to get the job done.  I definitely take that as a compliment and a challenge to continue to perform well. Who was it that bought us?  Didn't you mention something about going to the courts looking for money for performance bonuses for those of us who are continuing on to SwapCo?  How soon will we know if we'll be able to remain in the same building?

that's about all that i can think of...if you get any more news today, please send it my way too...

See you Monday...


All

A reminder that you are scheduled to interview for the Trading Track Thursday,  November 1st, from 2.00 pm onwards.   Resumes and schedules will be forwarded to you shortly.

Regards,

Karen Buckley


Ward, this is hot off the press, please let me know if this is sufficient, if
necessary we can refine the attachment.

Kurt
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 05/16/2002
03:23 PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
05/16/2002 02:57 PM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: March Clear Sky Curtailment

Kurt,

The spreadsheet we discussed for March is attached. Having rerun the numbers
I found a typo on the email that was sent out before. The billable
curtailment should have been 10,737,017  not 10,737,107. This also affected
the Curtailed production.Taking this typo into account the values in the
spreadsheet agree with the values previously provided. The spreadsheet is
still in the order that the site provided, not time or turbine sorted. In
addition I haven't done any formatting, so number of decimals varies. Lastly
the times in this sheet, unlike the sheet from the site, are in UTC like
SCADA (VisuPro).

Mark


(per April Weatherford) - Conf Rm per Lisa Zarsky - 3-4321


Vince and Stinson,

We met Bill Bradford yesterday, the credit model modification turns out to be
three projects.

1) Potential exposure calculator

   This requres forward curves simulation and revaluation of all deals over
the tenor (typically 20 years).
   It needs multi-factor HJM and gas-electricity joint factors of loading.
Output from this model is the maximal loss amount and
   its confidence interval.

   Expected delivery time: 1 month

2) Include Asian option model into the current XLL calculation engine.

    This is more concrete and simly to do.

    Expected delivery time: 2 weeks.

3) Incorporate Krishna's "EAM" option valuation into the credit model

    This one is not yet urgent.

I may need more resources to accomplish these tasks.   Paulo has difficulty
to commit himself to even to the second task,
citing that he has other things to do.  Therefore I need your help in setting
the prorities.

Thanks,

Zimin


Dave:
Can you do the same printout today of children for product #33076
Thanks
John


Jeff,

Here is the application from SPB.  I guess they want to use the same form as
a new loan application.  I have a call in to Lee O'Donnell to try to find out
if there is a shorter form.  What do I need to be providing to the buyer
according to the contract.  I was planning on bringing a copy of the survey
and a rentroll including deposits on Monday.  Please let me know this morning
what else I should be putting together.

Phillip

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
08:47 AM ---------------------------

"O'Donnell, Lee (SPB)" <LODonnell@spbank.com> on 02/15/2001 05:36:08 PM
To: "'Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com'" <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

I was told that you were faxed the loan application.  I will send attachment
for a backup.  Also, you will need to provide a current rent roll and 1999 &
2000 operating history (income & expense).

Call me if you need some help.

Thanks

Lee O'Donnell

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com [mailto:Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:34 AM
To: lodonnell@spbank.com
Subject:

Lee,

My fax number is 713-646-2391.  Please fax me a loan application that I can
pass on to the buyer.

Phillip Allen
pallen@enron.com
713-853-7041

 - Copy of Loan App.tif
 - Copy of Multifamily forms


Please note the following request by Richardson to suspend another month of
their contract for the month of August.  We will have to account for this
contract suspension in the August forecast with an estimated loss of
$116,203. 500  (35,700 MM/d * 31 days* $.105)

Dennis -   Our records indicate that the new terminate date should be
4/31/02.  Let's discuss if you need some documentation to make the system
reflect this termination date.  CS

Perry - Please verify if your capacity sheets reflect this 4/31/02 terminate
date as well.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron on 07/25/2000
08:00 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dennis Lee                           07/24/2000 02:18 PM

To: Perry Frazier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Richardson Products Cr 24198

Brad at Richardson advises that he will suspend volumes on CR24198 for the
month of August, 2000 and will extend the term of his contract to October 31,
2001.  Brad states he will follow up with a written request.

Dennis


Steve,
Not a bad move for NEM.

I got it at 17.5 when the option was exercised against me.

Vince

Steve Bigalow@ENRON
04/27/2001 08:11 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 4/27

good morning,  strong open today. You can buy your NEM and  AU. However, I
will be glad to debate the point of whether inflation will be a problem for
the foreseeable future.

Buy ATSN and ACTU on open

Steve


See attached file


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 04:06 PM
---------------------------

"Amir Cyrus Ahanchian" <acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com> on 03/02/2001 10:43:08 PM
To: eric.bass@enron.com, reeder@mail.utexas.edu, bird3397@yahoo.com,
dandelionwine1@hotmail.com, dganc@yahoo.com, tyrell.harrison@enron.com,
brian.hoskins@enron.com, jefflerner@aol.com, btmazumdar@zdnetonebox.com,
moranito@hotmail.com, nghiatn@hotmail.com, Suresh_vasan@enron.net,
jwiseman@newregency.com
cc:
Subject: BE CAREFUL IF AT WORK!! Guaranteed, the best email ever!

--
Amir Cyrus Ahanchian
acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com - email
(512) 682-6996 ext. 1087 - voicemail/fax

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com

Return-Path: <jpcary96@hotmail.com>
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.32.180.196]) by mta08.onebox.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP          id
<20010301232248.EMWB29651.mta08.onebox.com@hotmail.com>          for
<acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:22:48 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:22:46 -0800
Received: from 204.27.156.147 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 01 Mar
2001 23:22:42 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [204.27.156.147]
From: "Patrick Cary" <jpcary96@hotmail.com>
To: acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com, bwfox_us@yahoo.com, rowdy_1999@hotmail.com,
orenmax@hotmail.com, jared_haun@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: CAREFUL IF AT WORK!! best email ever!
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 17:22:42 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1c12_5b32_765b"
Message-ID: <LAW2-F272VhEUsebmsp0000c2d0@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2001 23:22:46.0106 (UTC)
FILETIME=[85E593A0:01C0A2A6]

What's up guys?  Sorry for this mass e-mail, but you have got to see this
... be careful if you are viewing this at work or anywhere public.  I know
there are a few of you I haven't been in touch with for a while, but please
forgive me as I've been tied up in a shithole in Paducah, KY.  I hope all is
well with you.  Enjoy this e-mail.  BTW - Jared, this is a REAL forward ...
send me more of this stuff instead of the other crap that comes my way!
Adios,
Patrick

If only I knew who these girls were!

----Original Message Follows----
From: "alan armstrong" <astronga@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: KappaKappaDelta@yahoogroups.com
To: kappakappadelta@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [KappaKappaDelta] best email ever
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:07:50

 >
 >
 >
 >>
 >>Note: forwarded message attached.
 >>
 >>
 >>__________________________________________________
 >>Do You Yahoo!?
 >>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
 >>a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

X-Apparently-To: samueljking_2000@yahoo.com via web9007
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from sm5.texas.rr.com (24.93.35.219)  by mta310.mail.yahoo.com with
SMTP; 16 Feb 2001 23:37:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s5b6e2 (cs162118-22.austin.rr.com [24.162.118.22]) by
sm5.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1H7Y5e24149 for
<samueljking_2000@yahoo.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:34:05 -0600
Message-ID: <001201c098b5$16c0a3c0$6501a8c0@austin.rr.com>
From: "Brian Starnes" <starnes@austin.rr.com>
To: "Sam King" <samueljking_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: game on
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:40:09 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C09882.8FC69320"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Content-Length: 863920

strippers r fun
?
----- Original Message -----
From: brian.starnes@amd.com
To: starnes@austin.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: FW: game on

?
-----Original Message-----
From: TEA Lee, Lloyd [mailto:llee@aus.telusa.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Starnes, Brian; Cary Yarosh;  Chris Schild; Darwin; David; Eric Bergold;
Robinson, Jeffrey; Jesse; John White;  Mark Helton; Matt; Michael Arn;
Michael Gunterman; Michael Pham; Todd  work
Subject: game on

best just forward this one to the  crib....
<<game1.jpg>> <<game2.jpg>> <<game3.jpg>> <<game4.jpg>> <<game5.jpg>>
<<game6.jpg>> <<game7.jpg>> <<game8.jpg>> <<game9.jpg>> <<ggame10.jpg>>
<<ggame11.jpg>>

 - game1.jpg
 - game2.jpg
 - game3.jpg
 - game4.jpg
 - game5.jpg
 - game6.jpg
 - game7.jpg
 - game8.jpg
 - game9.jpg
 - ggame10.jpg
 - ggame11.jpg


[IMAGE]
 Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details .     Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Joe Horn , WR NO - The Leather Cheerios Updated 12/21/01 Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.   Maurice Smith , RB ATL - Xtreme Updated 12/21/01 A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Donald Hayes , WR CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.    Chris Weinke , QB CAR - KMB Express Updated 12/21/01 Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.   Kurt Warner , QB STL - The Hillrods Updated 12/21/01 Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.  Rich Gannon , QB OAK - Pierres Flea Circus Updated 12/21/01 Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.   Randy Moss  , WR MIN - Cali Bound Updated 12/21/01 Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.  Marvin Minnis , WR KC - Cali Bound Updated 12/21/01 Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.   Michael Westbrook , WR WAS - Third World Countryman Updated 12/21/01 Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.  Rod Gardner , WR WAS - Baby Blues Updated 12/21/01 Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.    Tony Richardson , RB KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Tony Gonzalez , TE KC - Xtreme Updated 12/21/01 Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.   Brett Favre , QB GB - Cali Bound Updated 12/21/01 Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.  Trent Green , QB KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.   Bill Schroeder , WR GB - Baby Blues Updated 12/21/01 Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.  Matt Hasselbeck , QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.   Johnnie Morton , WR DET - Cali Bound Updated 12/21/01 Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.  Reggie Wayne , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.   Amani Toomer  , WR NYG - The Leather Cheerios Updated 12/21/01 Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.  Marvin Harrison , WR IND - Third World Countryman Updated 12/21/01 Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.   Duce Staley , RB PHI - KMB Express Updated 12/21/01  Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.    Shawn Bryson , RB BUF - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Bryson will start in place of the injured Travis Henry this week. Consider him as a No. 2 RB if you need help at that spot.   James Thrash , WR PHI - Pumpdog Updated 12/21/01 Thrash was not very consistent during the regular season and may not catch a lot of TD passes in the final games of the NFL regular season. He will be a No. 2 wideout at best during the Fantasy playoffs.   David Patten , WR NE - The Wounded Ducks Updated 12/21/01 Patten's numbers have dropped off in recent weeks. Don't use him unless your team is very thin at wide receiver.   Joey Galloway , WR DAL - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Galloway has been a disappointment for Fantasy owners this season. Unless you're in a deeper league, starting Galloway during your playoffs isn't recommended.    Troy Brown , WR NE - The Hillrods Updated 12/21/01 Brown has been an inconsistent Fantasy receiver this year. He may not be a reliable option during the Fantasy playoffs.   Warrick Dunn , RB TB - Third World Countryman Updated 12/21/01 Dunn has been inconsistent this season. He will be a No. 2 back at best during your playoffs.   Antowain Smith , RB NE - She Said Updated 12/21/01 Smith is a must-start player during the Fantasy postseason. Even if his yardage totals aren't good, he is a tremendous TD threat.   Keyshawn Johnson , WR TB - Baby Blues Updated 12/21/01 Johnson has caught a lot of passes this season, but has only one TD reception. Nevertheless, he will still be a reliable receiver in your playoffs.  Anthony Becht , TE NYJ - 2700 HUEVOS Updated 12/21/01 Becht hasn't been a consistent target for the Jets this year. He may not be very valuable during the Fantasy playoffs.   More Updates  Teams, Rosters  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] KMB Express Dutch Quigley    Player TM Pos Status Next Bye Manning, Peyton  IND QB Active NYJ Week 4 Staley, Duce  PHI RB Active @SF Week 5 Dillon, Corey  CIN RB Active @BAL Week 8 Mason, Derrick  TEN WR Active @OAK Week 3 Hilliard, Ike  NYG WR Active SEA Week 12 Stokes, J.J.  SF WR Active PHI Week 6 Stewart, Tony  PHI TE Active @SF Week 5 Nedney, Joe  TEN K Active @OAK Week 3 Raiders  OAK DT Active TEN Week 6 Weinke, Chris  CAR QB Reserve STL Week 14 Redmond, J.R.  NE RB Reserve MIA Week 16 Henry, Travis  BUF RB Reserve @ATL Week 5 Muhammad, Muhsin  CAR WR Reserve STL Week 14 Graham, Jeff  SD WR Reserve @KC Week 17 Sharpe, Shannon  BAL TE Reserve CIN Week 13 Kasay, John  CAR K Reserve STL Week 14 Jets  NYJ DT Reserve @IND Week 11  Total Active Players: 9 Total Reserve Players: 8  NFL Injuries for KMB Express Updated Player Team Pos Injury Expected Return 12/21/01 Dillon, Corey  CIN RB Finger Expected to play Sunday at Bal. 12/19/01 Henry, Travis  BUF RB Knee Will not play on Sunday 12/20/01 Hilliard, Ike  NYG WR Toe Day to day 12/19/01 Mason, Derrick  TEN WR Hip Day to day 12/20/01 Muhammad, Muhsin  CAR WR Toe Status unclear for Sunday's game vs. STL 12/20/01 Sharpe, Shannon  BAL TE Leg Day to day [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


Done!  What's next?

Gloria G Barkowsky
03/20/2000 04:20 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNG

We have not had a demand charge on this since prior to 07/99.  Can
you take the demand charge off of the deal?

Chris Germany
03/20/2000 03:55 PM
To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNG

This deal terminates effective 3/31/2000.  FYI - all BUG terminate effective
3/31/200.

Brenda H Fletcher
03/20/2000 03:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CNG

Chris do you know when this deal # should terminate?
Thanks,
BF
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Gloria G Barkowsky
03/20/2000 02:55 PM
To: Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG

CNG deal #81247 has a demand fee until 03/31/00, and it should not.
Can you please correct this.  Please let me know.  Thanks, Gloria 3-7118


Support Services Group :

Accomplishments

Current Project List


---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 17/11/2000 08:22
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 16/11/2000 18:27:47
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 216668@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK: Minor metals - Cobalt bounces, rhodium
steadies.

UK:
Minor metals - Cobalt bounces, rhodium steadies.

11/16/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.

LONDON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - Cobalt finally rallied after a lengthy downturn
this week, while the rhodium price spike ran out of steam and antimony
continued to drift in thin trade, traders said.

COBALT REVERSES DECLINE
Cobalt prices finally reversed their recent steady decline this week, with
high-grade metal in particular boosted by a positive response to the latest
tender of stockpile material by the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).

"We've seen higher bids from China in the last couple of days, and European
customers are also coming in at higher levels - it looks like the market has
turned," said one trader on Thursday. He quoted a range for Russian 99.3 per
cent material of $11.50-12.00.

Other traders said, however, that some cheap offers of Russian metal in the
$10.80-11.00 range were still in the market.

Swiss-based trader Glencore was the high bidder among five companies at the
DLA's November 15 tender for 597,992 lbs of over 99.9 percent pure cobalt
cathodes.

The company offered prices ranging from $11.04 to $13.02 per lb for 17 lots.

Other bidders were Enron Metals and Commodities, Voss Metals, SFP and
Carolmet.

Despite the high cobalt content in the Gecamines cathodes offered by the DLA,
the material attracts a discount to current prices for Inco and Falconbridge
material, traders said.

"It's Congolese material that's been out of production for about seven years,
and a lot of the superalloy users have amended their specs lists in the
meantime," said one.

"Even though chemically it's perfect for their needs, a number of them don't
have official approval to use it, and that will take a while to come through,"
he added.

High-grade prices on Australian producer WMC Ltd's website,
www.wmc-cobalt.com, jumped by $2 in the space of 24 hours.

The company reported a sale at $13.25 a lb - the lowest level since late July
- on November 15, but subsequently did business up to $14.60 and was offering
at $15.25, basis November, CIF main Asian ports or delivered works Europe and
North America by Thursday. Total sales for the week to date exceeded 50
tonnes.

"The price gets to a point where it's so low that people can't hold back any
longer, and once it starts going up buyers come in for fear of missing the
boat," said another trader.

ANTIMONY STEADY, TRADE THIN

Antimony prices were steady in thin trade this week, with 99.65 percent
material indicated in a range of $1,450/1,550 a tonne.

Cheap material currently on offer, although the antinony content is 99.65
percent, often contains sufficient quantities of impurities such as bismuth to
make it unusable for trioxide producers, consumers said.

"We've seen offers around $1,450 but to get good-quality Hunan material
trioxide producers would have to pay around $100 more than that," said one.

The market is unlikely to feel the full impact of the Chinese clampdown on
fresh export licenses for this year until stocks already in Europe have been
used up, traders said.

"There's a lot of material either in Rotterdam or afloat - once this is used
up I think we'll see prices pick up again."

Export licenses for 2001 are expected to be granted around the end of January,
with fresh metal unlikely to be shipped until the following month, traders
said.

RHODIUM PRICES STABILISE

Rhodium prices softened marginally as the market stabilised following last
week's sharp short-covering rally, traders said.

"We've seen a slight easing back, though there are plenty of Japanese
companies lining up to take material on spot or long-term contracts if they
don't feel they can trust the Russian side of things," said one.

Spot free-market rhodium was quoted at around $2,050/$2,150 an ounce, down
some $50 from last week's highs, although traders said spot material remains
tight.

Sales of rhodium to auto-makers are up strongly in 2000, boosted by higher
vehicle production, tighter emissions legislation and changes in the platinum
group metals mix in autocatalysts, Johnson Matthey said this week in its
Platinum 2000 interim review.

On the supply side, Russian supplies of rhodium were seen totalling 280,000
ounces in 2000, more than four times last year's total, JM said. The precious
metals refiner forecast total global supplies of rhodium to jump 236,000
ounces to 737,000 ounces this year, with South African supplies seen rising to
434,000 ounces.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 80

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Thanks,  I too received the e-mail.  I am waiting on Russell to respond.  I
will let you know.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


do you people have jobs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Van Rassel <mvanrassel@rpmtec.com>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 3/30/2001 1:07 PM
To: 'Joseph G.Galea'; JONCH@magic.pmh.on.ca
Cc: Charles Jones; James Galea; james_mcdonnell@matthewscott.com; mitchmilestone@home.com; Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com; Lavorato, John
Subject: RE:

Here are my picks:

Gordon "Red" Berenson

Sheldon Kannegiesser

Lonny Bohonos

Jim Korn (not to be confused with James' gay porn moniker)

"Cowboy" Bill Flett

Hannu Jarvenpaa

Helmut Balderis (not to be confused with Joey's adult film star moniker)

Dennis Ververgaert

Leonard "Red" Kelly

Per-Olav Brasar

Jocelyn Guevremont

Roman Hamrlik (not to be confused with Lav's self-gratifying adult film star

moniker)

Ron Tugnutt (not to be confused with James' other gay porn moniker)

-----Original Message-----

From: Joseph G.Galea [ <mailto:galea@mcgown.com>]

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 12:19 PM

To: JONCH@magic.pmh.on.ca

Cc: Charles Jones; James Galea; james_mcdonnell@matthewscott.com;

mvanrassel@rpmtec.com; mitchmilestone@home.com;

Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com; John.J.Lavorato@enron.com

Subject: Re:

Count me in with Russian rubles to counter the free market forces. I don't

know about Americans as Imperialists though, Chris. Theories of mercantilism

resulted in Colonial Wars and The American Revolution. America doesn't try

to influence other countries, they simply take what they need, with or

without asking. Just ask Lav's Enron Corp.

$40 is a bit high for a Collective farmer, but I'll forego some panza's

(deep fried, not baked ) to make it happen.

Joe.

\

----- Original Message -----

From: <JONCH@magic.pmh.on.ca>

To: <galea@mcgown.com>

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 12:05 PM

>

> Gentlemen,

>

> We now have 6 confirmed entrants in our pool (Chris x2, Galea

> x2, Rich & Lav).  It looks like a go.  I will volunteer to

> have lists & money sent to me, then in true tag team fashion,

> turn everything over to my Indian blood brother Mr. Mcconvey,

> provided his Red Cow Disease has blown over by then.

>

>

> Will make a judgement call and set the entry fee at $40.

> Deadline for receiving lists and money will be Tues April 10.

> I will split the difference with Mr. Mcconvey as far as # of

> players, and will ask you to name your top 12 players, as well as

> 1 goalie.  (Fewer players will hopefully give us a tighter race.)

> ****Note to Lav - No, you can't use Mario more than once.

>

>

> Entries & fees can be sent to:

>

> Chris Jones

> 308 The Kingsway, Apt. #207

> Toronto, Ontario, Canada

> M9A 3V2

>

> ***Yankee imperialist greenbacks gladly accepted

>

> Chris

>

> PS I will talk to Buzz, still haven't heard from Mac, Charles,

> Van, etc.

>


Shannon,

I am in the process of cleaning up the February folder.  When finished you
will see two DPR's - NG-Price & NG-PR-OPT.  Mike and John have decided to
split out the old NG-Price book so that swaps/futures go to John and
options/exchange options go to Mike.  I will call you as soon as I have it
done.  Tonight is the first night we are using the new book.  I have not
heard anything back regarding the January variance since I left you the voice
mail.

Thanks,

Errol

   Shannon McPearson @ ECT                02/26/2001 11:11 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: PG Book

Errol,

I received a book request for the NG Options Book (Code ZH). Will this be a
new roll in the NG Price book, associated with the PG book code? Also, I
noticed that the PG book has three DPR's in the February folder. Should I be
using the 022001NG DPR or the 022001NGmike and 022001NGjohn? What did you and
Todd decide to do with the January variance from the NGP&L? Too many
questions!!

Thanks!

Shannon


Hey melba,

I need to get IF GD/D Waha for Mar approved.

Thanks in advance,

Eric


I'd like to attend.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Steve Van Hooser
	Sent by: Pat Radford
	01/08/2001 03:58 PM

		 To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chaundra
Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Connie
Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia
Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal
Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 2/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah MacDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Please RSVP

If you have not responded to the invitation below, please do so by Noon on
Tuesday, January 9, 2001 so that we have enough time to order lunch.  Thank
you.

	Steve Van Hooser
	Sent by: Pat Radford
	01/05/2001 09:51 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT,
Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron, Angela Davis/NA/Enron, Robert H George/NA/Enron, James
Grace/Corp/Enron, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT, Kimberlee
A Bennick/HOU/ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT, Linda R
Guinn/HOU/ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT, Merrill
W Haas/HOU/ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron, Diane Goode/NA/Enron, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron, Gail Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martha Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sarah
MacDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Connie Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Legal Temp
2/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Invitation to All EWS Attorneys and Paralegals

Everything About Enron's Insurance Programs

That You Were Afraid To Ask

(or Didn't  Know to Ask)

Presented by
David Marshall
Enron Corporate Risk Management

Thursday, January 11, 2001
11:30 - 1:00

The Houston Room
601 Jefferson
(We've reserved the Enron Shuttle to transport the "non-walkers")

Lunch will be served.  Please RSVP to Pat Radford at 39282.

One of the goals of Jeff Hodge and Barbara Gray is to increase the level of
departmental information sharing activities.  Since we are faced on a daily
basis with insurance matters in contract drafting and client advising, the
East/Upstream Origination and Trading Group felt it would be productive to
have Enron's Corporate Risk Management Group give a presentation on current
Enron Insurance Programs, policies and contractual risk allocation
preferences.  It then occured to us that this subject might be of interest to
all of the lawyers on the 38th floor.   Please join us next Thursday.

Sorry for the inconvenient location.  We'll make it worth your while with the
quality of the food and the presentation.


Enclosed is the current draft - we are seeking to file this by fax with DOAH by 5pm so I apologize for the lack of lead time.  If you should have any comments then please let me know ASAP.
Thanks,
Ryan

_______________________________________________________________

The information contained in this transmission may contain

privileged and confidential information. It is intended only

for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,

dissemination, distribution or duplication of this

communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the

intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email

and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an

email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

<>


Hey Guys!

I went through all the templates and removed the RT prefix for all the templates. You can now sort them alphabetically making the process of finding the right template a lot easier. From now on please do no use the RT prefix when creating new templates.

Geir


-----Original Message-----
From: 	e-service@sohu.com@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 11, 2000 2:01 AM
To:	Undisclosed.Recipients@mickey.netcom.nl
Subject:	This is amazing. see it now.!!!

                         The Most Powerful CD You Ever Seem.

Information is Power.

This amazing CD contained the most powerful information that ever released over the Internet,

click the links within this message and prepare to be amazing !!

                         http://www.cd-world.org/product/MEGA/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We honor all removal requests. Please replay this email with "Remove" in the subject line, if you wish to do so. We apologize for anything that may cause inconvenience.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**********         ***********


- SDG&E12-7 NGA emergency pet.DOC


Hi, Vince,

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Please see attached brief descriptions of SPVs, to my knowledge, there are a
couple more and I will keep you posted.

Best Regards,

Li


please add Tom Martin to this list.

From: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:45 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly R Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Angie Collins/ENRON@enronXgate, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Gross, Adam" <Adam.Gross@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a trader's roundtable meeting tomorrow, April 24th at 4:00PM in
EB3321.  Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thank you,
Jennifer
3-9440


JCharlton@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

JCharlton@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

ISO-NE has a filing pending at FERC to eliminate their ability to recall
energy from Resources selling ICAP into NY.  If FERC approves the filing,
the ISO will accept up to 350 MW of ICAP from the ISO-NE control area,
subject to the maximum 2558 MW of Installed Capacity located outside the
NYCA in accordance with Attachment B of the Installed Capacity Manual.
Installed Capacity in this context will be in the form of the ICAP
equivalent of the qualified Unforced Capacity (UCAP) sold, consistent with
the ICAP equivalent calculations in Attachment J of the ICAP Manual.

ISO-NE has requested an effective date for its filing of October 22 so FERC
is not expected to approve the ISO-NE tariff changes before then. The next
ICAP Supplier and LSE certifications are due to the NYISO on October 23.
The deficiency auction is scheduled on October 25. In accordance with the
last paragraph of Section 4.9.3 of the ICAP Manual, the ISO plans to open
the period for requesting such rights at 8:00 a.m. on October 18 and close
the request period at 5:00 p.m on October 22. This request period is
conditioned on a timely approval of the elimination of
recall rights by ISO-NE.

Resources located in New England (as well as PJM or HQ) that want to
qualify as ICAP Suppliers in New York must comply with the equirements set
forth in Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.9 of the ICAP Manual. The NYISO
encourages Resources to submit DMNC test results, Operating Data and other
required information as soon as possible to allow their participation in
the ICAP market if and when the Commission approves the elimination of the
recall procedures in New England.


We have not received any final allocation from Destin.  I'm not sure what the
holdup is.  I think Joe talked with Harvey at Rebel and communicated this to
him today.

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 11/16/2000 09:08:57 AM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Gas Daily Prices for Bazor Ridge

Susan,

I was wondering where you stood with volumes and pricing?

Again, thank you for all your help.

Stevens


Shirley,

Please, renew my membership.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
10:41 AM ---------------------------

main@iafe.org on 12/05/2000 03:47:45 PM
To: <main@iafe.org>
cc:
Subject: IAFE Membership

Dear Colleague:

We are pleased to report that we had a very exciting and productive year
with  dozens of activities around the world. As we enter our 10th year of
operations,  the IAFE has additional membership options available to you.
Please take a  moment to look at the attached membership form with the 2001
rate schedule.  Based on member requests, a Premium Membership is now being
offered that  includes the Annual Conference at a 30% discount, the Financial
Engineer of the  Year dinner, plus a subscription to the Journal of
Derivatives (JOD). The Full  membership remains as in previous years. The new
Regular membership includes all  membership benefits except JOD. Membership
is based on the calendar year January  1 - December 31, 2001.

Membership is also available on our secured  membership registration form at
our website http://www.iafe.org/about/join.ihtml. While on  our website,
please take a moment to visit our calendar listing upcoming events  for the
new year.

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to  contact me at
main@iafe.org<mailto:main@iafe.org>.

Regards,
Donna Jacobus
IAFE Office Manager
 - 2001 Membership Application.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Alexander, Kim D
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Y'Barbo, Paul
Cc:	Dronet, David
Subject:	RE: Fundamentals Web Site Inquiry - Gas

Hi Paul,

I'd like to get some more information before following up on your request.

Could you please provide the following so I can research this.
1. Effective Begin Date [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	01/01/1998
2. Effective End Date [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	10/19/2001
3. Ref Begin Date [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	01/01/2002
4. Ref End Date [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	12/31/2006
5. Publication [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	NG
6. Curve Code [Y'Barbo, Paul]  	NG

[Y'Barbo, Paul]  Also, since my note yesterday, I found price data on 09/30/2000 (a Saturday) in the data that was returned to me. Those prices were the same as those on 09/29/2000. I am most concerned with the prices given for 09/16/2001 (a Sunday). It is easy enough to delete those prices. Are the prices on 09/17/2001 to 10/19/2001 good?

Sorry to ask for these again, but these specifics are needed to analyze the data that was returned to you.

Thanks,
Kim
x5-3868

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	<paul.y'barbo@enron.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:11 AM
> To:	GASFUNDY
> Subject:	Fundamentals Web Site Inquiry - Gas
>
> Type of Inquiry: Request for General Assistance
> Location: EB1344
> Phone: 5-4173
> Email: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
> Re Page:
> Comments: I pulled the forward gas curves (1/02 to whenever
> available) for each of the days 9/1/01 thru 10/19/01. Why
> does 9/16/01, a Sunday, have price data? Also, 4/30/2000
> (another Sunday) has price data that is the same as 5/1/2000
> price data. I assume that the 4/30/01 data is an accidental
> duplication. However, the 9/16/01 data is completely
> different than the prices of the days near it.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Message Transmitted: Monday, October 22, 2001
> This message was generated from the contact form on the
> Fundamentals Web Site.
>


What is expected for the Tuesday bid? I would guess the most critical from a
timing perspective will be a response centered on price and
commercial/technical issues. Michael indicates below he would like a
timetable for internal approvals to a closing. Do we have any indication how
pressed he is to close and fund versus agreeing on economic terms quickly and
allowing us to review the form of contract to ensure compliance with
accounting and finance guidlelines along the lines of our discussion earlier
this week? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann
Cc: Booth, Chris; Rose, Steven; Virgo, Robert; Duran, W. David
Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Dernehl, Ginger
Subject: FW: CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

Ginger --

Please send to Rick's team.

Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

FYI - The report is attached.

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : August 14, 2001

CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

Nearly 20 years of competition in the natural gas market has reduced national energy costs by more than $600 billion, according to a new study issued Monday.

This amounts to per-household savings of $5,938 as a result of gas deregulation, which began in the late 1970s with the phased removal of wellhead price ceilings, then graduated to lighter-handed regulation of interstate pipelines and now is focusing on opening up the distribution end, according to the study commissioned by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM), a non-profit think-tank in Washington, DC.

"The nearly 20 years of competition we've experienced in the natural gas industry proves that the right conditions can foster lower costs for consumers and motivate the industry to make investments that benefit the environment, our economy and our national security," said CAEM CEO Ken Malloy.

In addition to the cost savings to the public, the study credits deregulation for the rise in the number of gas suppliers at the wholesale and retail levels; a reduction in long-term price fluctuations, although it has triggered more short-term price volatility; greater focus on energy-efficient purchases by customers, making gas the fuel of choice for many; and industry improvements in how its buys, sells and trades gas supplies. In addition, it noted that light-handed regulation of gas pipelines has been a big factor in passing through lower commodity costs to consumers.

In short, the study reveals that the gas deregulation skeptics of the 1970s and early 1980s "were wrong by a long shot," according to CAEM.

"What we also need to recognize is that we've witnessed a re-distribution of wealth from foreign oil producers to domestic natural gas producers, and that these lower prices have contributed measurably to a more stable inflation rate, lower greenhouse gas emissions and improved our [national] security due to a reduced reliance on imported oil," said Malloy, who formerly was on the staff at FERC and the U.S. Energy Department.

The study, entitled "California Here We Come: The Lessons Learned from Natural Gas Deregulation," offers much guidance for the energy markets in the western state: 1) put the right regulatory framework in place, half measures are more dangerous than doing nothing; 2) don't expect results overnight, stay the course; 3) markets do work, and consumers and the environment will be winners under properly executed reform; 4) the costs of change are easier to calculate than the benefits; all the studies about gas deregulation underestimated the benefits; and 5) organized consumer advocates are often very wrong about the impact changes will have on consumers.


Gas OII Settlement Parties:

This morning, the CPUC approved the Comprehensive PG&E Settlement Agreement,
resolving all issues concerning PG&E in the Gas Strategy Investigation.
Thanks to all of you for your part in making this settlement possible.

The next step is getting the tariffs approved.  PG&E sent out a first draft
of the tariffs on March 28, 2000, and then held a tariff workshop on April
10, 2000.  We will send out a revised draft next week, on the 25th, which
will take into account suggestions many of you made on the prior draft.  We
will then hold half-day tariff workshop on Tuesday, June 13th.  We must file
the tariffs with the CPUC by July 17, 2000.  A detailed schedule for
completion of these tariffs is attached.

 <<OII Tariff Schedule for Parties_.doc>>

Thanks again for your efforts in negotiating this settlement, and we look
forward to completing the tariffs together with you.

Ron Stoner     Randy Litteneker
(415) 973-3606    (415) 973-2179

 - OII Tariff Schedule for Parties_.doc


An Agreement to Interconnect and Operate Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities has
been executed between HPL and the Rio Nogales Power Project, L.P.  This
agreement will provide for the physical means by which gas can be delivered
from the HPL South Texas Joint Venture Pipeline System and the Rio Nogales
Power Plant located near Seguin, Texas.  The interconnect will be built on
the South Texas System near the city of Prarie Lea.

The power plant is presently in construction.  The plant owners will build a
new pipeline to connect to the HPL system.  The new pipeline is anticipated
to commence construction around June 1, 2001.  Under the Interconnect
Agreement HPL will, at its expense, install the hot tap and valve and then be
reimbursed for its actual expenses.  Expenses are estimated to be less than
$150,000.

A Guaranty Agreement has concurrently been executed between HPL and
Constellation Power, Inc.   This agreement by the parent of Rio Nogales Power
Project, L.P. provides a corporate guaranty for payment of the work by HPL up
to $300,000.  With receipt of the executed Guaranty, Facility Planning and
Enginneering are released to recommence discussions with Rio Nogales and
thier pipeline constructor, Pinnacle, to finalize details of the
interconnection.

In recognition of the prospective close between HPL and AEP, HPL will attempt
to have the work performed after the close.  If the currently anticipated
close date of June 1st occurs, this schedule should not be a problem.  If the
work can be scheduled after close, the receivable to HPL should be
straightforward and not require any special handling.  I therefore request
that Jim Haden and Bob Camp coordinate with me regarding the schedule for the
work.

I would also request that Ken Kaase provide our Joint Venture Partner
notification of the interconnection agreement or whatever advice is required
under the JV Agreement.  Ken, I will provide you whatever details are needed
for this purpose.

The interconnect is located on the system that would deliver future volumes
to the City of San Antonio should HPL be sucessful in negotiating such a
contract.  It is also the system that could service the new Austin peakers
either through new pipe or through a third party transport.  To date, there
is no gas sales or transportation agreement with Rio Nogales.  Because of the
current state of hydraulics on this system, and the multiple potential loads,
all  interested individuals need to be cognizant of a need to coordinate and
plan for handling these prospective loads towards maximizing the benefit of
the asset .

Please advise if there are any questions or concerns.


MATHEW SMITH,

The PEP system closes on Friday, May 25, 2001.

Our records indicate that you have not selected reviewers.  Please suggest a list of reviewers as quickly as possible - the feedback process cannot begin until your list of reviewers has been reviewed and approved by your supervisor.

To suggest your reviewers, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select 'Suggest Reviewers' from the Main Menu.

If you have any questions regarding the PRC process or the PEP system, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 11, 2001 5:00pm through May 14, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Move vlans for EES in Enron Building
Environments Impacted:  EES in Enron Building
Purpose: Provide more capacity to the network
Backout: paste in old configs
Contact(s):  Gail Kettenbrink    713-853-4524
  Michael Huang      713-345-3201

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 15, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CPU replacement on server sennacca.
Environments Impacted:  RMS
Purpose: Replace faulty CPU that is offline.
Backout: Restore server to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission of the following servers:  intra, intra-dev, conman1,
aserv1, ardent, dbadmin
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Server no longer used.  The servers will be decommissioned or
redeployed where necessary.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   2:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Resource and OS upgrade to server fracture.
Environments Impacted:  Global company RMS  ECM
Purpose: An OS upgrade is needed to provide the disk upgrade solution.
Additionanl memory is needed as well.
Backout: Attach the old disk solution and reboot to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  ENA
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:15:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at     8:15:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:15:00 AM London
Outage:  Bounce PWRPROD1 database
Environments Impacted:  Enpower User
Purpose: Change some configuration to improve database performance
Backout: Use the old parameter file.
Contact(s):  Tantra Invedy  713 853 4304

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Quarterly Maintenance - Telephone System
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Quarterly maintenance. While voicemail nodes are being serviced (one
box at a time), a slight disruption will be experienced.
Messages will continue to be stored but will not be delivered until each node
of voicemail is back up and operational.
CMS call center management reporting will not be availalble during this
time.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard    713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Memory replacement for server electron.
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Replace faulty memory module.
Backout: Get new memory if necessary
Restart server with out memory as last resort
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Project:  WestConnect RTO (for-profit TransCo)

WestConnect							Filing made by PTOs October 15

Comments Due							November 15

Estimated Date for Draft Circulation 					November 9 (Perrino/Alvarez)

Estimated Date for FERC Action					mid-late December

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Yoho, Lisa; Lawner, Leslie; Comnes, Alan; Walton, Steve; Alvarez, Ray; Frank, Robert; Perrino, Dave; Lindberg, Susan; Fulton, Donna
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Update on Timing of Proceedings

As Project Lead of one or more of the proceedings that are currently underway at FERC, would you please send to this group a timeline (date of filing or date of FERC issuance, due date for comments, estimated date for FERC action) for each of the proceedings that you are the assigned lead.  For example, for RTO Week, the timeline would be:

Project:  RTO Week

RTO Week									October 15-19

Comments on RTO Week							November 3

Estimated Date for Draft Circulation (and who is responsible for the first draft)	November 1 (Sarah will write the first draft)

Estimated Date for FERC Action							Mid-December (which could be in the form of additional proceedings, such as a NOPR)

Because we have so many proceedings pending, and because FERC continues to change the dates for interventions and comments, this information will allow us all to keep on top of what needs to be done.

Please send your responses to this group by COB Wednesday.

Thanks

Sarah


---------------------- Forwarded by Anthony Dayao/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 10:00
AM ---------------------------

Cherylene R Westbrook
07/06/2000 04:47 PM
To: Cindy Cicchetti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Giselle James/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terry
Furches/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xochil Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Shoup/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kim Ladish/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Oliver/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angelina V
Lorio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Ovalle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anthony Dayao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Anthony Dayao Happy Hour

Assistants:

Please forward to your groups ASAP.

Thanks,
Cheri x3-6477


Great dialog on everything that's wrong with price controls.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Onukogu+2C+20Ernest+22+20+3CErnest+2EOnukogu+40dowjones+
2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 1:11 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject: POWER POINTS:Nevada Suffers FERC Unintended Consequences --

> POWER POINTS:Nevada Suffers FERC Unintended Consequences
>
>    By Mark Golden
>    A Dow Jones Newswires Column
>
>   NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Those who have opposed wholesale electricity price
> controls have been labeled as extreme free-market ideologues who are
> insensitive
> to the practical impacts on peoples' lives of high electricity prices.
>   But the most common argument against price caps has been logical, not
> ideological: Price controls have never worked. Market participants always
> find a
> way around the rules.
>   This week the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decided that it will
> have
> to consider at its meeting next week revisions to its June 19 price
> control
> ruling. The initial price cap rule, set by the California Independent
> System
> Operator last spring, was only a few paragraphs long. Each successive
> price cap
> order has gotten longer, though effectiveness still appears out of reach.
> The
> FERC's April order was 28 pages long; the June order was 48 pages. And now
> additional rules are on call to plug the new loopholes.
>   The revisions will also try to repair damage done to the market by the
> June
> order. During a spell of very hot weather Monday, Sierra Pacific Resources
> (SRP)
> subsidiary Nevada Power had to initiate limited rolling blackouts to a
> small
> number of customers for 45 minutes. The company attributed the blackouts,
> in
> part, to the new price controls.
>   Sierra Pacific's chief spokesman, Paul Heagen, provided a bird's eye
> view of
> the practical realities of the FERC's new price cap regime.
>   Power Points: After having a few days to look into it, can you say that
> price
> caps definitely contributed to blackouts in Nevada on Monday?
>   Paul Heagen: Yes, but first let me say that all of it was unintentional.
> FERC
> was trying to do the right thing. Price caps were a noble effort to solve
> a real
> problem in California.
>   But on Monday the market needed speed and clarity to function. It had
> neither,
> and that can be attributed to the price caps. Normally, in one or two
> phone
> calls we could have got what we needed. On Monday, we were five to six
> calls
> into it and still on the phone.
>   Price caps are having the unintended consequence of dragging other
> states into
> the California morass. We have this artificial environment which we are
> all
> trying to sort through.
>   PP: How, specifically, are the caps having this effect?
>   PH: There are a couple of elements. The 10% premium for power sold to
> California is supposed to reflect concerns about credit. That 10% in an
> open
> market is no big deal, but in a constrained situation the seller will grab
> it,
> because now it's his only chance to make money.
>   Also, the way this is set up, they look backwards. They determine the
> price
> after the fact. I can't think of any business in the world where you sell
> a
> product and find out later what price you sold at.
>   This had a very chilling effect on people's willingness to sell.
> Normally, a
> cloud cover comes in and a utility has a little extra power to sell in the
> real-time market. Normally, those little 50-megawatt packets move pretty
> easily,
> and that's really important for maintaining reliability.
>   With the price cap, utilities hunkered down. Selling at $92 wasn't worth
> the
> risk. They figured they might as well hang on in case they needed it.
>   Also, we have a voluntary curtailment program that allows us to share
> savings
> with customers who agree to curtail use. If the market is, say, $500, we
> might
> pay them $250/MWh to curtail demand. But in a $92/mkt, we can offer them
> such a
> small amount of money that they stay on.
>   PP: Have you talked to FERC about these problems with the price
> controls?
>   PH: We've had a senior team in Washington, D.C., at the FERC since last
> week.
> Right away we saw another effect of the FERC order: It penalizes companies
> like
> ours that signed long-term supply contracts before the order because many
> of
> those deals were done at prices above the price cap.
>   The biggest issue for us, is, did FERC really mean to penalize companies
> like
> us that planned ahead? It's long-term contracts that provide price
> stability.
>   It's unfair to our customers to expect them to pay for long-term
> contracts
> that have been undercut by price caps. If we get into a situation where we
> have
> a little extra to sell, now we can't recover our costs.
>   PP: With such high prices the past year, a lot of small, oil-fired
> turbines
> have been dusted off and put into service on time for this summer. Traders
> for
> other southwest utilities have said that all these little turbines have
> been
> very helpful when supplies got tight earlier in the year, but they weren't
> available this week because they cost more to run than the price cap. Did
> you
> see the same thing?
>   PH: We have some small turbines that we put in Reno and the Lake Tahoe
> area in
> the last few months. They were supposed to provide peak power, but they
> get
> uneconomic in a hurry under the price cap scheme.
>   You know, we've tried to isolate ourselves as best we could from the
> California situation and behave very independent of how California
> behaves. So
> Nevada is a great test case to see if price caps have an unintended effect
> outside of California. We were able to minimize the impact on our
> customers
> Monday, but the situation has maximized the attention of the country on
> the
> impact of price caps.
>   -By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604;
> mark.golden@dowjones.com
>
>   (END) DOW JONES NEWS  07-06-01
>   03:14 PM- - 03 14 PM EDT 07-06-01
>


FYI...

SP
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000
12:21 PM ---------------------------

"Leo, Tony" <tleo@fce.com> on 11/28/2000 08:36:25 AM
To: "Leo, Tony" <tleo@fce.com>, "''Stephen.Plauche@enron.com' '"
<Stephen.Plauche@enron.com>, "''Scott.Healy@enron.com' '"
<Scott.Healy@enron.com>, "''Terri.Austin@enron.com' '"
<Terri.Austin@enron.com>
cc: "Levine, Ross" <rlevine@fce.com>, "Skok, Andy" <askok@fce.com>, "Bentley,
Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>, "Nock, Herb" <HNock@FCE.com>, "''Jacqueline
Scheib' '" <jscheib@rc.com>

Subject: Preliminary Spec with Spare Parts

Attached file is a new version of the preliminary spec, with added language
on initial spare parts.

 - Preliminary Specification with Spares.doc


Guys, I have spoken to Cliff and Mark and we are comfortable moving forward
under the structure we have discussed.

 FCEL: - $5MM in equity and 1.3MM warrants from corporate treasury stock that
vest based upon 60MW of orders;
  - discussion with FCEL in which we disclose ALL infromation we have about
the potential Conn. deal - I will require that myself and Mark be on   that
call;
  - the transaction is fully press released immediately.

 CRRA: - subject to final due diligence on the development risks, we provide
the management and wrap for CRRA on the potential fuel cell development
opportunity that consists of between 25 and 50 MW;
  - any appropriation of funds from the government will require DPUC hearing
at which we will fully disclose in a factual manner our interest in    FCEL.

I will require that Mark Haedicke manage this process and sign off on all
press releases, term sheets, disclosure discussions, contracts and regulatory
filings.  I believe that we have this managed appropriately as long as we
manage the process as per the script and in a factual manner.

Thanks
Delainey


<<Loan and Security Agreement>> Your message

  To:      Piasio, Stephen
  Subject: Loan and Security Agreement
  Sent:    Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:20:22 -0500

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Piasio, Stephen on Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:24:02 -0500
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:NAM:EXCHNY18

-----
Message-ID: <86256871.0054544C.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
From: Sara Shackleton <sshackl@ect.enron.com>
To: "Piasio, Stephen" <sp42054@imcnam.ssmb.com>
Subject: Loan and Security Agreement
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:20:22 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:


could you just let me know if you got the last email


perfect... thanks.


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
12:02 PM ---------------------------

	From:  George McClellan                           10/01/2000 02:36 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
Subject: Japan - Asia markets

Mike -

Thanks for your voice mail of Friday regarding your trip to Tokyo.  As we
have discussed we are in the process of identifying a strategy and forming a
team to lead our Asian coal efforts.

We view continental Europe and Japan / Asia as the next areas of growth for
our group.  One of our greatest challenges has been identifying and
attracting to our group the best "Enron" people, and strong industry
players.  We have made some progress with the recent addition in Houston of 3
- excellent mid-marketers with industry backgrounds.  However we are still in
the process of building a strong European organization, and staffing Sydney
with a core group of Enron traders and industry mid-marketers.

Clearly Japan represents the single largest market for coal in Asia.  The
other major markets are Taiwan, Korea, Hong Kong and to a degree India.  The
largest coal exporters in the region are Australia, Indonesia, China and
Russia.  Our staffing strategy for Asia is to initially build a core trading
and marketing group centered around 2 - 3 experienced "Enron" guys in Sydney,
add  mid-marketers with industry experience in Sydney and Tokyo, and hire  2
- locals in China to look after our deliveries from PRC suppliers.

Our experience to date has shown that industry guys orphaned in a regional
office face certain failure. As a result we are trying to avoid the mistake
we have made in the past of hiring local industry players, and then failing
to provide them with proper direction and support.

We are on target to relocate at least 2 - "Enron" guys to Sydney by Jan -
Feb.  We will continue to search for strong industry guys in Sydney, and make
any necessary changes to our existing structure there.  We have not yet
started to identify qualified people with industry experience in Tokyo - but
will obviously do so.  I will get with Stu and Joe to discuss using a local
head-hunter, and advertising in trade journals etc.

We share your views on our potential for growth in Asia and Japan, and are
working to put a team in place that will be focused on developing a strongly
competitive, sustainable  business in the region.  Our initial goal is to
develop Asia to the point where Sydney is running it's own books for both
coal and freight, and we are a major supplier in the region.

Stu and I will be in Hong Kong and Beijing Oct.  7 - 11 to meet with the
Chairman of Shenua Coal, and senior management of Shanxi Coal, China Light &
Power, and Hong Kong Electric.  The primary purpose of the trip is to
encourage Shenua to perform in accordance with their obligations under our
supply agreement; introduce ourselves to Shanxi; assure CLP that we will
perform under our term sales agreement; and start negotiations with HKE for a
term sales contract.

I will coordinate my schedule with Joe, and will spend a few days in Tokyo
(Oct. 12 - 13) at the end of the PRC trip.  We can coordinate our efforts,
put a time line in place for staffing the Tokyo office with qualified coal
guys, and discuss our overall strategy for entering the Japanese market.

I will be in the office Mon. - Weds., and am available to meet with you and
Jeff to discuss the above at your convenience.

 Thanks,

George


To re-cap:
I will talk to Will Smith in Houston IT about adding a function in Deal
Blotter to choose confirm or no confirm. In the meantime, Houston Confirms
group would greatly appreciate us changing these deals to no confirm. They
will assume that all daily deals done with PGE are no confirm, but the deals
will still show up on their report (and cause confirm group crankiness) if
they are marked to be confirmed. Thanks for your help.

Kate

Diana Scholtes
03/09/2001 12:24 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: PGE Dailies

I just heard the same.  I was talking to Tim about the requirements being
made regarding daily confirmations, and the final decision was not to confirm
PGE daily deals.  Question though,  when we put deals into the system in
Blotter, they automatically confirm.  Do we have to go into every deal and
switch the flag or is there a better way around it?

d


We have received the executed Non-Disclosure Agreement between the referenced
Counterparty and EnronOnline, LLC dated 12/22/00.  Copies will be
distributed.