Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The IBM e-Energy Executive Forum ) "Personalization, Partnership, and
Profitability"

Designed for executives in the utility industry looking to leverage Customer
Relationship Management in the competitive marketplace. Topics will focus on
how process and technology can be leveraged to gain competitive advantage.
Featured speakers will include IT analysts, solution partners, IBM
executives, and customers including: John Goodman, President of e-Satisfy;
Richard Grimes, Director of CRM Energy Services; David Bonnett, Global
e-Energy Sales Executive, Siebel Systems.

www.ibm.com

Learn more about SCIENTECH'S newest InfoGrid: Venture Capital Firms, Emerging
Technology Companies and Services in the Electric Industry.  Get the latest
news and information available today regarding technologies in distributed
generation, fuel cell, solar, wind and energy information services.  Over 110
companies and over 42 investors are featured in this intelligence product.
Download a sample at www.ConsultRCI.com or contact Chris Vigil at (505)
244-7605 for more information.
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 28, 2001

AES Completes Acquisition of IPALCO

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES) announced that it has completed its
acquisition of IPALCO Enterprises, the Indianapolis, Ind.-based utility with
3,000 MW of generation and 433,000 customers in and around Indianapolis.
IPALCO has now become a wholly owned subsidiary of AES through an exchange of
shares in which each outstanding share of IPALCO common stock will be
exchanged for 0.463 shares of AES common stock. IPALCO common stock was
suspended from trading at the close of the market on March 27.

Analysis: The purchase of IPALCO, an established and respected utility in the
Midwest, will help AES to continue to secure its foothold in this region and
further the company's aggressive expansion efforts along the generation side
of its business. AES already owns CILCORP, an energy services company whose
largest subsidiary, CILCO, serves portions of Illinois and Missouri. (Note
that pursuant to an SEC order, AES will restructure and/or sell its ownership
interests in CILCORP within two years in order to retain its status as an
exempt holding company under PUHCA). Thus, through the purchase of IPALCO,
AES is strengthening a presence in the Midwest that it already has
established. In addition, from this purchase we now know that AES, along with
being a global player, intends to remain dominant throughout the United
States as well. Further, the acquisition represents a rather bright
development for AES, considering that the company has recently encountered
some ongoing challenges related to its operations in California.

First, let's examine the value of AES' acquisition of IPALCO. Certainly, the
3,000 MW of generation that AES gained in the deal must have been the primary
draw, but from comments made by Dennis Bakke, AES president and CEO, the
company apparently also wants to become a marketing presence in Indiana (and
the Midwest as a whole). IPALCO gains in the deal by now being under the
aggressive management of AES; the subsidiaries under IPALCO such as
Indianapolis Power & Light will now stand a much better chance for global
development and expansion.

As with other generation acquisitions that AES has made, the company secures
a decided edge over competitors that may have strong marketing presence but
fewer hard assets. With its strong generation portfolio, to which the IPALCO
purchase only adds, AES can further guarantee to potential customers a
reliable power supply. AES is one of the largest generation companies in the
world, having reached this level through a series of strategic acquisitions.
The company's generating assets include interests in 134 facilities totaling
over 48 gigawatts of capacity. By comparison, Calpine has approximately
36,700 MW, Dynegy has a net ownership of 12,497 MW, and Reliant has about
27,000 MW. In addition, AES' electricity distribution network has over
920,000 km of conductor and associated rights of way, and sells over 126,000
GWh per year to over 17 million end-user customers.

AES has surpassed many of its power supply competitors by maintaining an
aggressive growth strategy over the past year. Recent milestones for the
company are too many to list here. However, highlights include acquiring a
controlling interest in Electricidad de Caracas; acquiring 100-percent
interest in Tractebel Power; purchasing 70-percent interest in the Mohave
Generating Station in Laughlin, Nev.; and purchasing GeoUtilities, Inc., an
Internet-based superstore for energy and telecom services. Just since the
start of 2001, AES entered into an agreement to purchase all of the energy
assets of Thermo Ecotec Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Thermo
Electron Corporation of Waltham, Mass., for $195 million, and announced new
generation development projects in Texas and California. AES also has
continued its international expansion with an acquisition of a 140-MW
oil-fired co-generation facility in Italy, the acquisition of a 290-MW
barge-mounted natural-gas fired generating business in Nigeria, and the
purchase of additional ownership interest in a 1,000-MW hydro plant in
Argentina.

As I've said in the past, AES is a company to watch. Even when acquisitions
that AES is making seem rather small, they must be taken within the context
of the portfolio that AES is building. Whether it's generation, retail
marketing, telecom, or selling electricity over the Internet, AES has a
foothold in many different areas. AES is a major player that can offer the
full package to a customer, which may in the end be its strongest advantage.
The company maintains that it is engaged in three lines of businesses, which
are all equally important to its strategy: power generation, network delivery
services and retail energy marketing. However, it is important to recognize
that AES continues to build a huge generation arsenal and now has the
capability to market its commodity products through its marketing
subsidiaries.

However, although AES has had a fairly successful year, the company has hit
some bumps and made some questionable decisions along the way, all of which
were related to the California market. AES has established several tolling
agreements with Williams Corp. for the power plants that AES owns in
California. Under the tolling agreements, AES essentially rents its plants to
Williams so that Williams can generate fuel to electricity, which it then can
sell on the wholesale market. In other words, Williams had a contract to
market all of the power generated by AES' California plants. In hindsight,
AES may regret the questionable decision to enter into the tolling agreements
with Williams in California. Although AES did well last year, with net income
rising 181 percent to $641 million, the company reportedly lost $11 million
on the lucrative California market. Meanwhile, Williams (NYSE: WMB) reported
unaudited 2000 income from continuing operations of $873.2 million, or $1.95
per share on a diluted basis, versus $178 million, or 40 cents per share on a
restated basis, for 1999. AES also took a hit when it had to pay air
pollution fines and buy power on the wholesale market to meet its obligations
to Williams when it was forced to shut some plants down.

Further, AES (along with other companies) continues to fall under the intense
scrutiny of FERC for pricing that the commission has deemed "unjust and
unreasonable" for power generated at AES-owned plants. FERC's investigation
centers on the unavailability of certain so-called "must run" generating
plants in the Los Angeles area that are owned by AES Southland, a subsidiary
of AES. A "must run" plant is a generating facility that the California ISO
can call upon to provide energy and ancillary service essential to the
reliability of the California transmission network. Several weeks ago, FERC
announced that a preliminary investigation raised serious questions about the
actions of Williams Energy Marketing and Trading and AES.

On March 14, FERC gave the two companies 20 days to explain why they should
not refund $10.86 million to California utilities. Further, FERC said that
"Williams had a financial incentive to prolong any outages" of two AES-owned
plants last April and May. "Williams received more revenues as a result of
the respective outages," the commission said. AES responded to the charges by
saying that the plants were taken off line for repairs and that it did not
share in market revenues from sales of power from the plants. According to a
report in The Washington Post, AES Pacific Group vice president Stu Ryan said
that as long as the plants are in operating condition, Williams decides when
they will run and what it will charge for their power.

As a result of the unavailability of the two "must run" AES plants, the
state's ISO had to obtain power from other plants, also owned by AES, where
the power was much more expensive and the companies made much larger
profits.  The commission said its investigation indicated that AES and
Williams refused to make the two "must run" plants available "for reasons
that were not directly related to the necessary and timely maintenance" of
the plant.

Many power supply companies that were active in the California wholesale
market now are retreating due to the volatility and uncertainty of the
state's market. Although it remains unclear how AES will continue to
participate in the California market, it may be a smart move for the company
to focus on expanding operations in other regions of the United States (such
as the Midwest). Yet, how AES' acquisition of IPALCO will impact the
company's bottom line remains to be seen. Standard & Poor's (S&P) is
reserving its assessment of the partnership for the time being, and is
keeping AES on CreditWatch. AES' double-'B' corporate credit, single-'B'-plus
rating on subordinated debt, and single-'B' rating on the company's trust
preferred securities remain intact pending further review and information
about the acquisition of IPALCO. Also, S?lowered its corporate credit ratings
on IPALCO to triple-'B' from single-'A'-plus, and IPALCO's subsidiary,
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. (IPL), to triple-'B' from double-'A'-minus,
and revised the CreditWatch implications to positive from negative. S?expects
to address the CreditWatch status in the next two weeks.

On March 27, AES shares closed at about $47.75. As of mid-morning on March
28, AES shares were priced at about $50.00. Over the last few days, AES
shares have increased by about 5 percent and have closely tracked the Dow
Jones Utility Average.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Just to give you a heads up, the Tom James of Houston office will be moving
to a new location on February 1, 2002.  We have bought a building, and our
beautiful new office will be located in the Brookhollow area, close to 610
and 290.

Our new information:

Tom James Company of Houston
4111 Directors Row
Houston, TX  77092

713-957-9898 new phone
713-957-9820 new fax

Please note the change in phone number will be effective FEBRUARY 4, 2002.

We will be sending you written notification of our move closer to the moving
date.  If your address has changed since we last met, please be sure to
forward it to me so that I can notify you.

Thanks, and Happy New Year to you!

--------------------------
Carol Measom
Tom James Company of Houston
4605 Post Oak Place Drive, #200
Houston, Texas 77027
713.622.5678, ext 124
www.tomjamesco.com

Learn more about me at:
http://www.tomjames.com/asp/biopage.asp?empidn=05568


I am sorry.  This was the only time I could get Danny and the three VPs together.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Lay Review Run Through

Not before you scheduled the meeting.   Only as a result of it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Lay Review Run Through

I heard its been canceled.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Lay Review Run Through

Too bad I can't be there.    I have a staff meeting to run.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Neubauer, Dave; Hayes, Robert; Gadd, Eric; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Armstrong, Julie; Robertson, Audrey; Kovalcik, Tammy; Wadle, Susan; Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW: 2002 Plan Lay Review Run Through
Importance:	High

This meeting has been moved to Friday, October 26 from 9:00-11:00 in EB 42C2, Omaha Room 696.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Neubauer, Dave; Hayes, Robert; Gadd, Eric; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Armstrong, Julie; Robertson, Audrey; Kovalcik, Tammy; Wadle, Susan; Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve
Subject:	2002 Plan Lay Review Run Through

Please plan to attend a run through with Danny of your 2002 Plan Presentations for the Lay Reviews on Thursday, October 25 from 9:00-11:00 in 42C2.  For Omaha room 696.

Thanks

Tracy


Sally,

We have six contractors working for CL, all from Valtech.  Monthly burn rate is about $110k.

Tom


I would like to have a copy of the appraisal.  See you Monday at 2.

Phillip


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
04:29 PM ---------------------------

ERisk <eRisks_news@email.eRisks.com> on 04/27/2001 10:40:36 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ERisk Essentials

ERISK ESSENTIALS --
What's New at ERisk.com, 27 April 2001

WEEKLY REVIEW
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0CwR0Ar
This week's economic, banking and P&C insurance news, from an enterprise risk
management perspective. Read it here ...

ANALYSIS
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0B4V0An
Why managing intellectual property risks is getting more challenging.
Will lead-based paint suits be "the next asbestos" for US insurers?
Is the idea of deposit insurance reform dead, or just sleeping?

BASLE SPECIAL 1
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0B4W0Ao
Confused about the new Basle Capital Accord? Look no further. Over the next
two weeks, we'll be presenting a quick guide to all you need to know before
the May 31 deadline for responses to the consultation document. In our first
article this week, Rob Jameson introduces the major themes, proposals and
controversies of Basle II.

BASLE SPECIAL 2
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0B4W0Ao
In the second of our special Basle guide, Alan McNee outlines the key
problems with the proposals, from market discipline and operational risk to
credit derivatives and maturity factors. More Basle coverage and analysis to
come next week on ERisk.

SEARCH ENGINE
It was broken, but now we've fixed it. ERisk’s new, more powerful and
efficient search engine will let you conduct more meaningful searches of the
ERisk site, with relevancy scores for each result and clear identification of
where each document can be found. Coming soon: a brief summary of each
document found.

INTERACTIVE P&C STUDY
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0CwV0Av
ERisk and strategic partner Risk Management Solutions (RMS) last week
released the results of our jointly sponsored Property & Casualty industry
study. Visit the interactive online version to explore the capital adequacy
and risk-adjusted profitability of various segments within the P&C insurance
marketplace.

****************************************************

The ERisk Essentials is published every Friday by ERisk.com.

To subscribe, please register on our website.
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0BXt0At

To unsubscribe, access your account. Your username is the email address where
you received this message.
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0BXs0As

To be reminded of your password, or reset it:
http://email.eRisks.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHvU0BHCKe0CjE0B6R0Al


---------------------- Forwarded by Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 02:06
PM ---------------------------

William E Kasemervisz
12/12/2000 01:58 PM
To: Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bowl Pool 2000

---------------------- Forwarded by William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT on
12/12/2000 01:58 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           12/08/2000 12:52 PM

To: John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allen B Childress/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E
Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Graham/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, gmc_13@yahoo.com, john,
jennifer.battey@corning.com, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad Hitch/EU/Enron@Enron, Patrick Stafford/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mason
Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mo Bawa/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Brian O'Rourke/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Chad Pennix/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bowl Pool 2000

Ready to take my money?  Welcome to Bowl Pool 2000.  Entries due on December
19th (tuesday).  Don't forget to sign your name on the form.

Spread the word.  We need a big honkin' pot.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 4:23 PM
To: arlanz@mexis.com
Cc: Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie
Subject: Final Docs.

Attached are the final documents which includes

1.  Agency and Management Agreement - Clean and Redlined copy which shows the
changes per my discussion with Jay Goleb at Baker & Botts
2.  Gas Confirm for June 1 thru June 4, 2001
3.  Gas Confirm for June 5 thru June 30, 2001
4.  Gas Conform for July 1 thru October 31, 2001
5.  GTC which applies to all three confirms
6.  Agency Notice Letter - Mexicana to send to its Permian suppliers for
notice of Enron's agency.

Please print out and execute documents 1 thru 5 and fax to Barry Tycholiz.
We will follow up with duplicate originals for execution.  Thanks for all
your cooperation.

 << File: Agency & Management Agreement FINAL2.doc >>  << File: Agency &
Management Agreement FINAL2(red).doc >>
 << File: MEXICANA (CONFIRM)(4 Day).doc >>  << File: MEXICANA (CONFIRM)(June
5 - June 30).doc >>  << File: MEXICANA (CONFIRM)(July1 - October 31).doc >>
 << File: Mexicana (GTC)1.DOC >>
 << File: Supplier Agency Notice Letter.doc >>


FYI
----- Forwarded by Jason Peters/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2000 03:36 PM -----

	Dave Samuels@ECT
	05/17/2000 03:16 PM

		 To: Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dow Jones Wed-Based Services Agreement

here is the Dow Jones agreement.  Let's discuss when you have a chance.

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 03:07
PM ---------------------------

"Beveridge, Francesca" <Francesca.Beveridge@dowjones.com> on 05/17/2000
02:58:50 PM
To: "'Dave.Samuels@enron.com'" <Dave.Samuels@enron.com>
cc: "'Rahil.Jafry@Enron.com'" <Rahil.Jafry@Enron.com>
Subject: Dow Jones Wed-Based Services Agreement

Hi Dave and Rahil,
I am sending along the basic contract for your review.  Please send back
your comments to me and to Michele Leflar (michele.leflar@dowjones.com).
Best,
fb

>   <<Form--Newswires Web Distribution10.4.99.doc>>

 - Form--Newswires Web Distribution10.4.99.doc


Good morning, did you go to the farm this weekend?  How are the horses etc.  Are you teaching this semester?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


The report named: DPR - Concentration <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=48&report_name=DPR+-+Concentration&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

PRELIM - The risktRAC VaR calculation is still running.


Sorry I didn't return your call last night, Lisa and I went to hear Julie
Andrews speak at Jones Hall and didn't get home until after 10:00 p.m.
Knowing what a precious commodity sleep is I refrained from possibly
disturbing your own.


I would recommend that we participate.  In addition to myself we may want Steve V and/or Teb to also attend as they explain their FERC filing for making the backbone system jurisdictional.  Let me know if you concur and then I'll advise Jeff.  Thanks--gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Below is your spreadsheet.  This one has your direct reports on
it...........the other spreadsheet I sent to your VP/Directors didn't show
this.

FYI

THX


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 02:51 PM -----

	Steve C Hall
	02/01/2001 02:19 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jklauber@llgm.com
		 cc: robin_tompkins@pgn.com
		 Subject: CalPX Termination Letter


Sally -

We would like to begin tracking & measuring volumes transacted and settled in the retail business - by commodity.

Can we discuss how to get our arms around this and when we can begin to see weekly, monthly, quarterly data?

Thanks - Dan


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BROWN, ELIZABETH Y              RICHARD A DIETZ                 Oct 26, 2000
BURLESON, ROBERT M              ROCKEY K STORIE                 Nov 08, 2000
DONOHO, LINDY H                 STEVEN M HARRIS                 Nov 02, 2000
HYATT, JESS K                   STEVEN M HARRIS                 Oct 30, 2000
ROBERTSON, AUDREY D             STEVEN M HARRIS                 Nov 10, 2000
SCOTT, SUSAN C                  DREW J FOSSUM                   Nov 03, 2000


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Richard Shapiro                           08/02/2000 01:47 PM
	Sender's Phone No: 713 853-7751

Sent by: Ginger Dernehl
To: Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole
Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: wweiland@velaw.com (bcc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES)
Subject: 3rd Revision to Critical Path Matrix

Please note, the revised matrix sent minutes ago has been revised once
again.  Please utilize the "3rd Revision" (noted at bottom right hand corner
of page) Critical Path Matrix which is attached to this e:mail.

Thanks

gngr


Begining 6/4/01 most North American Gas and Power quotes will be displayed on and transactable from the TRUEQUOTE trading platform. Please call me if you have any questions or need more information. Thanks.

Savita
X31787


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 21, 2001

Notice ID: 3285
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2001

                 THERE ARE NO CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS DAY

Effective Thursday, November 22, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)               0
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0
Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)            10,000
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)           60,000
Dranesville (E1)         50,000

EQUITABLE GAS:

Hi Hat (F3)                   0

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):

Beaver Creek (H1)             0

CNR PIPELINE:

Boldman (CNR02)               0
Conoway (CNR03)               0
Johns Creek (CNR08)           0
Canada (CNR09)                0
Canada (CNR10)                0
Stafford (CNR11)              0
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)      0
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)            0
Huff Creek (CNR14)            0
Wiser (827280)                0

CONOCO:                       0

Delta Natural Gas (819288)    0
Grant (P1)                    0

NOTE:  ANY APPALACHIAN PRODUCTION FLOWING DIRECTLY INTO COLUMBIA'S LINE KA
BETWEEN COLUMBIA'S BOLDMAN COMPRESSOR STATION AND COLUMBIA'S HUFF CREEK
COMPRESSOR STATION AS WELL AS PRODUCTION FLOWING INTO COLUMBIA'S LINES SM-116,
KA-15, PM-3, AND PM-17 IS 0 NON-FIRM.

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              25,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33      30,000
     Market Area 34      20,000

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21      10,000
     Market Area 22      10,000
     Market Area 23      20,000
     Market Area 24      10,000
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Please add these names on the distribution of the EES Summary Sheet each
morning.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/01/2001
06:28 AM ---------------------------
To: Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EES Revenues for 02/28/01

Bert,

Please add Jubran Whalan and Daniel Kang to your distribution.

NFB


Bummer...forgot to tell you guys about the address: here it is and, sorry
for the inconvenience. Enjoy the show!

Performances are at the Choral Rehearsal hall on campus between Zellerbach
and Dwinelle.

Vince

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Vincent
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 10:18 AM
> To: 'evmba_social@haas.berkeley.edu'
> Subject: BareStage presents YUMI THOMAS, mezzo-soprano with pianist
> ER ICA SCHEINBERG
>
> Hi all:
>
> This is a great opportunity to enjoy a great concert, right at Berkeley,
> at only $5! For those of you who are interested in Classical music but
> have not received much exposure to it, this is a good way to find out
> before you make the commitment of a season ticket. Please read on for
> details.
>
>     YUMI THOMAS
>     mezzo-soprano
>
>     IN CONCERT
>
>     with pianist
>     ERICA SCHEINBERG
>
>     Singing international dramatic music from Japan,
>     Brazil, Russia and the United States, from
>     Rachmaninoff to Duke Ellington
>
>     SATURDAY, OCTOBER 21 @ 8:00pm
>     $5 general admission
>     ($4 for members of Student Musical Activities)
>
>     Yumi Thomas is a rising star who has performed
>     extensively in the Bay Area and beyond with the
>     San Francisco Girls' Choir, Ars Cantus, UC Chamber
>     Chorus,
>     Cal Jazz Choir, and others.  Her mature voice and
>     sensitive, expressive interpretations have earned
>     her praise in major Bay Area publications.
>
>     Pianist Erica Scheinberg accompanies Ms. Thomas in
>     a rich mosaic of songs from Japan, Brazil, Germany,
>     France, Russia, and the United States.  A complete
>     program can be found at the end of this message.


Daily Blessing
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless139.htm

Easter Dress
http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor60.htm

please visit our sponsors..they keep this site going!

$10,000 no-cost-to you insurance...take advantage of this offer! I did!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/insurance.htm

need ink for your printer...here are the best prices in town on ink
cartridges and refills.

http://www.mrinkman.com

want to know who's calling while you're online?  free download

http://www.daily-blessings.com/callwave.htm

do you check your email more often than your calendar?  free download

http://www.daily-blessings.com/reminder.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


I am attaching the presentation from the May 7th EGM all-employee meeting.
Due to time constraints, the meeting covered only four of the EGM markets:
coal, LNG, weather and crude/products.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Lisa

----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Cathy Phillips@ECT
	05/10/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: May 7 Meeting

Hi Lisa -

Here is the presentation.

Cathy

	Lisa Yoho@ENRON
	05/10/2001 01:18 PM

		 To: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: May 7 Meeting

Cathy -

Do you have an electronic copy of the presentations that were made on May
7?   If so, would you mind forwarding it to me?

Thanks.
Lisa


The Operator Qualification (OQ) Rule, 49 CFR 192.801 requires that all pipelines develop a qualification program to evaluate individual's ability to perform covered tasks.  Each gas controller must complete the qualification program no later than June 1, 2002.  Each task must be completed in the presence of a trained Verifier in order to be qualified for that covered task.  The successful completion of a task must be documented and sent to the Training Group.  An individual may ask to be verified on a task as many times as necessary to successfully complete the task and receive a "Qualified" status.

At the November gas control staff meeting each gas controller was given a copy of the Skills Qualification Manual (SQM) and the Training and Verification Guide (TV Guide) to review.  I will be receiving the official personalized SQM this week and verification can begin at any time after that.  Steve January will assign you to one of the verifiers listed below:

Jerry Graves
Dale Ratliff
Darrell Schoolcraft
Gary Spraggins

Verification and qualification will take place on days and at the control board.  Your team members will be responsible for operating your position and answering the phone during this process.  It is very important to keep interruptions at minimum.  You can verify on all or any part of the SQM when you feel you are ready.

We are required by law to document that you can perform the task in the SQM. Remember this is your job, you do this everyday, and you do it very well.  If you have any questions call me at 713-853-1534

Dale


Dear Sally,

Hope you had a good trip to Dallas, although it was a bit interrupted with
you trip back to Houston for Meagan's Open House.  Dad and I would like be
with you all on Friday the 20th of October.  I believe that may have been the
game we attended last year too.  We have meetings, the other two dates, so if
that still works for you we will plan on that date.  It also gives Dad a bit
more time to hopefully get his voice.  He returns to "DR" Bob Raley, week
after next for the results of all the testing he did this week.

Glad you will be over on Tuesday-we will look forward to seeing you then and
glad you will have time for a visit after lunch tool.

Love,

Sue


This is being sent on behalf of Bryant Delgadillo.

It appears that some of you did not receive the attached the first time.

Dear Committee Member,

Some minor revisions were made to the draft arbitration demand letter which
was circulated last week.  Please note the following changes:

Page 1, 1st Paragraph:

"Southern California Edison ("SCE") has failed to pay more than $800
million for electricity that it contracted to purchase through the
California Power Exchange Corporation ("PX").  SCE and its parent Edison
International have admitted owing this debt in numerous public filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Yet, SCE publicly announced that
it owes nothing.  SCE has refused all efforts to discuss payment and, in
recent meetings responded with threats of litigation.  The PX has been left
with no alternative except to commence arbitration to establish the amount
due and to collect the debt."

Page 2, 4th Paragraph:
"As a result of defaults by SCE and the largest investor-owned utility PG&E
Corp., the PX filed bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 11 on March 9, 2001,
case No. LA-01-16577-ES.  Pursuant to order of the bankruptcy court,
entered on June 29, 2001, the Official Committee of Participant Creditors
of the PX was authorized to prosecute this action in the name of the PX.
The PX is pursuing this arbitration for the benefit of its participants and
the PX does not intend to preclude, waive or prejudice any effort by any
participant that may choose to pursue its own claim on its own behalf."

I also have attached a revised version for your convenience.

(See attached file: 23052653.pdf)

 - 23052653.pdf


Rick - This is the document I mentioned this AM.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 09/18/2000 03:27
PM ---------------------------

Sanjay Konur@ECT
08/30/2000 01:07 PM
To: Chris Long
cc:

Subject: synfuel 101

Chris,

This should help  Talk to you soon.

Sanjay


FINALLY, it's about time we hear from you.

I'm glad you're focused on schoolwork.  That's where your mind should be
anyway.

I'll plan on seeing you on Nov 4th.


Mark, Sara and Mary:
Jim would like to talk to someone about problems he is having with his
customers concerning the ISDA and CSA forms.  Apparently, most of his
customers feel that it is too complicated and Jim would like to see if any
alternatives exist.  Could someone please contact him?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


http://www.enerfax.com/

begin 666 Enerfax Daily.url
M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I"05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=W<N96YE<F9A>"YC;VTO#0H-
M"EM$3T,C-2,V70T*0D%315523#UH='1P.B\O<&5R<V]N86PN;7-Y+F)E;&QS
M;W5T:"YN970O;7-Y+V4O9"]E9&%I;'DO#0H-"EM);G1E<FYE=%-H;W)T8W5T
M70T*55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=W<N96YE<F9A>"YC;VTO#0I-;V1I9FEE9#TT,#=$
0,S4Q,C U-C%#,# Q,D(-"@``
`
end


To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The ISO received today a subpoena from the California Public Utilities
Commission. The subpoena is attached.  The subpoena requires response by
April 2. The subpoena includes a description of the confidential treatment
that the CPUC will afford documents produced in response.  In accordance
with the protective order in 00-08-002, the ISO will mark as confidential
documents it produces to the CPUC that contain information subject to
20.3.2.  Concerns related to the subpoena should be directed directly to the
California Public Utilities Commission. The CPUC contact related to the
subpoena is Barbara Ferguson who can be reached at (415) 703-2682.   The ISO
would appreciate being notified also of any concerns.  The ISO contacts are
Jeanne Sol, at jsole@caiso.com and Norma Formanek at
<mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> nformanek@fbm.com both of whom should be copied
on correspondence.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - 3-26ISO Subpoena.doc


David:
Have you done any memos outlining the changes to Article 9 and if so, is it
something that we can see?  Also, is it your view that  New York will adopt
the new Article 9 and if so, when?  Finally, given the fact that Enron's
primary type of collateral are LC's and cash, and we rely on perfection by
possession, do you think that there is anything about the new Article 9 that
we should be worrying about?  If this question requires more time to analyze
let's talk first.  Thanks.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Please respond to Bestfares.com Hot Deals  Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

 SUMMER SALE WORLDWIDE UP TO 50% OFF
This week, we have so many deals that we do not know where to start. We have a coast-to-coast sale, some cities under $174 roundtrip. We have kids (two-17) $98-158 family fares, travel deals to Mexico up to 50 percent off and a fare sale to Canada with dirt-cheap fares to Vancouver. We also have Australia on sale with kids (two-17) as low as $99 roundtrip. Europe is on sale for the second time this year for June 16 through August 31 departures where you can save $300 to $400 roundtrip. Read the deals below and save big bucks this spring and summer with Bestfares.com.
SAVE UP TO $400 RT WITH OUR SUMMER EUROPE SALE DEPARTING JUNE 16-AUG. 31
If you have been holding out hoping for great summer deals to Europe, then this could be your lucky day. Purchase your tickets by April 25, and you could save up to $400. This special sale is for travel commencing between June 16 and August 31, 2001. We even have lower fares if you take off prior to June 14. Here are a few samples: New York City, Boston or Philadelphia to London, $508 roundtrip; Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego, Orange County or Seattle to Manchester is only $618 roundtrip. This is a savings of $350. Paris starts as low as $588 roundtrip, Amsterdam from $598 roundtrip, Brussels or Madrid from $648, Rome from $718, Frankfurt or Munich from $688 and more visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=58
MEXICO SUPER SALE AS LOW AS $142 RT KIDS 2-11 $106 THROUGH SEPT. 30, '01
Now you can go to Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, Mazatlan, Guaymas, Hermosillo, Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Cancun through September 30, 2001 for cheap. From the West Coast to Guaymas or Hermosillo, fares start at $142 roundtrip, kids $106. Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Mexico City and Guadalajara start at $178 roundtrip, kids $138. From the Midwest including Texas, Colorado, Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin, airfares start at $238 roundtrip, kids $154. From the East Coast, airfares to Cancun start at only $328 roundtrip. Check out our super sale fares to Mexican beaches and cities at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646
VANCOUVER, CANADA AT UNBELIEVABLE SUMMER SALE PRICES
Vancouver, one of the coolest cities in Canada, is on sale at super sale prices. We also have been able to waive the $40 fuel surcharge for this special four-day sale. Travel is valid through September 30, 2001. Here are some sample fares: From Los Angeles, $158 roundtrip; from Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Detroit, Orlando, Minneapolis, St. Louis and more, $218 roundtrip; Atlanta, $238; Boston, New York City, Philadelphia or Washington (DC), $278. Check out our super sale to Vancouver and other Canadian cities at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646
OVER 200 U.S. CITIES ON SALE FOR $162 OR LESS THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01
Where in the U.S. can you fly for under $162 roundtrip? Here at Bestfares.com, we have over 200 U.S. city pairs on sale to save you big bucks. How cheap? How about San Diego to Austin or San Antonio for $141 roundtrip with no fuel surcharge? Kansas City to Las Vegas, $125 roundtrip; Nashville or Columbus (OH) to Las Vegas, $161; Los Angeles to Oklahoma City, Columbus (OH), Little Rock, Omaha or Kansas City, $143 or less; New Orleans to Tulsa, San Antonio, Indianapolis, Raleigh or Providence, $143 roundtrip. Now, for the really cheap fares: New Orleans to Kansas City or Hartford, $99 roundtrip or Columbus (OH) to New York City, Boston, Philadelphia or Washington (DC), $89. Remember, these are only a few of the cities that are on sale this week. Check out
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=16526
SPIRIT AIRLINES INTRODUCTORY TRANSCONTINENTAL FARE SALE ENDS APRIL 25
Florida-based Spirit Airlines concludes its introductory fare sale April 25 for the launch of its new transcontinental flights with service to Los Angeles and Oakland (CA)/San Francisco for as low as $99 each way. The largest privately held U.S. airline also begins nonstop service between Atlantic City and Chicago O'Hare International (starting July 2) and initiates the industry's only nonstop service between Detroit and Oakland (CA), serving the San Francisco Bay Area, starting May 16. Some of the Spirit Airlines transcontinental fare deals are: Chicago O'Hare-Los Angeles nonstop service for $99 each way for travel May 9-September 13; Fort Lauderdale-Los Angeles one-stop service for $119 each way for travel May 9-September 13; Detroit-Oakland (CA) nonstop service for $99 each way for travel May 16-September 13; Fort Lauderdale-Oakland (CA) one-stop service for $119 each way for travel May 16-September 13; Washington (DC)-Fort Lauderdale or Melbourne (FL) nonstop service for $69 each way for travel April 26-September 13; Atlantic City-Chicago O'Hare nonstop service for $79 each way for travel July 2-September 13; and Atlantic City-Los Angeles one-stop service for $119 each way for travel July 2-September 13. Fares are based on a roundtrip purchase and do not include a $2.75 fee per segment, which is defined as a takeoff and a landing. Passenger facility fees of up to $18, depending on itinerary, also are not included. These special sale fares must be purchased by April 25. For more information, see
http://ads06.focalink.com/SmartBanner/page?18517.23
COAST-TO-COAST BETWEEN 58 U.S. CITIES $174 RT THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01
This summer, if you want to fly from Seattle to Fort Lauderdale or San Diego to Providence, you can find airfares from Bestfares.com for as little as $174 roundtrip. Travel is valid through September 10, 2001. Portland (OR) to 34 U.S. cities is $174 roundtrip or Los Angeles coast-to-coast is $174-198 roundtrip. If you want to travel this summer a la cheap, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=15796
FAMILY FARES $98-$158 RT USA/CANADA/MEXICO
We have some outstanding family fares to the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii and Mexico. With our coast-to-coast family fares, each adult ticket purchased (we have those on sale too), up to two children ages two through 17 can fly for only $98-158 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. With our Alaska/Hawaii family fares, adults fly for up to 50 percent off the standard published fares and children can fly for $310 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. These destinations include Honolulu, Kona, Maui, Anchorage or Fairbanks. With our Mexico family fares, for each adult ticket purchased, up to two children ages two through 17 can fly for $158 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. Mexican hotspots include Acapulco, Cancun, Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Mexico City, Puerto Vallarta and more. Be sure to take a look at these super hot family fares, so you can go on vacation with your kids and not put a hole in your pocketbook. For our coast-to-coast family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11653
for our Alaska/Hawaii family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11664
And, for our Mexico family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11663
CHILDREN (AGES 2-17) FLY TO SYDNEY OR AUCKLAND FROM $99 RT
This summer, if you have travel plans for either Auckland or Sydney with children (ages two-17), you could be taking the kids for as little as $99 roundtrip! The adult fares from Los Angeles or San Francisco are $1,198 roundtrip. Combine that with a child's fare of $99 and your total would be only $1,299 or $650 roundtrip per adult and one child. Departures are valid between May 1 and August 31, 2001 with returns by September 30, 2001. Travelers departing from other U.S. cities might pay higher children's fares, the most expensive from the East Coast where the fare is $524. If you have plans for your family to go to the South Pacific this summer, this is the deal for you. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=14455
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hot_deals-1835631U@hotdeals.bestfares.com
 Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Attached is the final list for name changes and mergers for August 2000.

The name change overlays were done on the dates indicated.

The ERMS short names will be changed TOMORROW, August 23, in the afternoon.
If there are any objections please contact me or Bill Hare at  X3-9249.

Record inactivations will be done on the afternoon of Sept, 1.

Please call Cheryl for questions or comments X3-3103


How is that ops package coming?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooke, Ian
Sent: Sun 9/9/2001 4:30 PM
To: Dorland, Chris
Cc:
Subject: Nov 01 -Oct 02 Spread and Price Data

Let me know if you require anything else.

<<Spreads Data.xls>>

Ian

(403) 974-6770


Team,

Attached is a very rough draft of a book to be put together describing the
potential Crescendo purchase of the Wildhorse South Gathering System.  There
are still a lot of holes, and I would appreciate you adding your knowledge to
improve it.

Please call me with your suggestions.

Thanks,
Mark
x31709


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanders, Richard B.
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Sweet, Twanda
Subject:	FW: California Update 7-18-2001
Importance:	High

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitman, Britt
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew
Cc:	Walsh, Kristin
Subject:	California Update 7-18-2001
Importance:	High

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Kristin Walsh at (713) 853-9510 or G. Britt Whitman at (713) 345-4014.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
?	Multiple MOU Plans Debated
?	California State Budget Faces One Last Hurdle

Budget
There is a small possibility that Sen. Burton will not recess the Senate on Thursday unless the Senate passes the budget that the Assembly passed last night (7-17). However a key Democrat, Sen. Sheila Kuehl, has been is in Italy and is on a 16 hour return flight. No one knows if she has been told to return and without her presence, two Republican votes are still needed to pass any urgency measure for the budget.  Kuehl's vote is crucial if they take the bill up on Thursday.
MOU Mayhem
There are currently three leading MOU plans being resuscitated by the California House and Senate deliberations.  Senator Burton is hoping to keep the published schedule and adjourn for a month's recess on Thursday evening.  Speaker Hertzberg is reportedly not thrilled with leaving until the Edison issue is resolved.  However, rumor is that whether or not they recess on Thursday, their adjournment will mark the end of the Second Extraordinary session and all XX  bills passed and signed will go into effect in 90 days (all others will be dead).  Although Davis has stressed the urgency of passing a comprehensive "bail-out" plan and even threatened to call an emergency session to prevent legislators from taking a 30-day recess on Friday, there is no clear indication that legislators will comply with this request.
?	Hertzberg's bill 82XX - Of the more obvious differences from Davis MOU,  82XX proposes to offer SoCal $300 M less for its transmission lines in addition to penalizing Edison if it fails to act in good faith in closing the deal.  It comes as no surprise that during bill deliberations, SoCal raised objections to the bill and warned of impending difficulties (bankruptcy) for So Cal were the bill left unamended.
?	The Wright-Richman bill 83XX - We reported last week that 83XX remains the only measure fueled by bipartisan support.  AB 83XX was heard in an "informational" hearing yesterday (7-17) and will be heard again today in the Assembly Energy Committee.  Assemblyman Rod Wright, the Chairman of the Committee, presented AB 83xx with Dr. Keith Richman, a Republican Assemblyman from Southern California. They offered 83XX as an Edison bail-out, pure and simple. Wright was clear to distinguish his bill from 82XX, which he said has conservation easements and land requisitions, a renewable portfolio which will add an additional fee on ratepayers, and reasonable review for long term contracts. While the chances of the Richman bill being successful appear slim, reports that that Hertzberg will try to negotiate elements of his own bill (82XX) as amendments to the Wright/Richman measure suggest that at least Hertzberg feels Richman's 83XX stands a chance.

?	The Byron Sher bill, SB 78XX (Polanco) - Previously presented by Sen. Polanco on behalf of Governor Davis, SB 78XX has received special attention from Senate President, John Burton.  Although it has never been heard by a committee, SB 78XX is currently on the Senate floor and ready for a vote. The Senate Energy Committee and Senate Appropriations Committee are both scheduled to have informational hearings on this bill today.  Note, the meetings are informational because neither committee has possession of the bill.  These hearings will provide information to committee members, avoid a formal vote, and simultaneously shield Burton/Polanco from claims that the details of SB78XX were never released.  The Senate is scheduled to be in session tomorrow, ostensibly to vote on the state budget and SB 78XX. Given Burton's penchant for wanting to keep on schedule to recess tomorrow, there is no guarantee that he will hold the Senate in session once they hear SB 78XX. Thus, the Senate may never even see AB 82XX and AB 83XX unless either or both bills are passed out of the Assembly today and get special treatment by Burton to be heard tomorrow. Burton has previously adjourned the Senate to keep on schedule once they finish their business, even if the Assembly is behind them.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kilmer III, Robert
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	FW: Settlement Offer

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Diane Hess" <dhess@gbmdc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Diane+20Hess+22+20+3Cdhess+40gbmdc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Charlie Moore; Robin Nuschler; Harris, Steven; Greg Porter; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay; Hartsoe, Joe
Cc:	Rob Kilmer; McCarty, Danny
Subject:	Settlement Offer

Suggested revisions.

Steve Stojic

 - TranswesternSettlementOffer.doc


David,

Sounds like a safe bet.

Vince

From: David Port/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 12:57 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Another Bet

Vince

I here you are running abook on how quickly we can implement Convolution VaR
for power and since I am up against a summer deadline for this I felt I
should take the other side.

So how about I buy you dinner if I get it done ?

Rgds
DP


When I put the changes in TIS, the total RTA changes from (8,562,517) to (13,717,606).  The change of (5.1) million is not what Robbie passed along to me as the expected change.  Do those numbers sound correct?

Thanks,
Michelle
x57357


Thought you'd like this....
******************************************************************************
**************
 Political  Philosophies: Explained in Simple "Two-Cow" Terms
with an Update for the  state of California

Socialism: You have two cows. You keep one, but  must
give the other to your neighbor.

Communism: You have two cows.  The government takes
both and provides you with milk.

Fascism: You  have two cows. The government takes
both and sells you the  milk.

Bureaucracy: You have two cows. The government
takes them,  shoots one, milks the other, pays you
for the milk, and then pours it down  the drain.

Dictatorship: You have two cows. The government
takes both,  then shoots you.

Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy
a  bull.

Democracy: You have two cows. The government taxes
you to the  point that you must sell them both to
support a man in a foreign country who  has only one
cow, which was a gift from your own  government.

Corporation: You have two cows. You lay one off,
force the  other to produce the milk of four cows, then
act surprised when it drops  dead.

California: You have two cows. The state tells you how
to milk  your cows, when to milk your cows, how much to
milk your cows and the most  that you can charge for the
milk. You go broke and sell the cows. The state  calls you
greedy and blames you for the current milk shortage.


Do you still need a revision of the 3rd current estimate? If so, should we update it for September actuals? Or should we revise the 3rd ce for the 43 mill revenue deferral to 2002 only, and report September actuals in the October monthly cash flow forecast? Let me know what you need, thanks.

Carolyn Winowitch
PGE Accounting
503-464-8191


Jim:  I want to put Aronowitz for ENA as well as EGM.  He will get an assist from Sager but he will lead.  Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fallon, Jim
Sent:	Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Hickerson, Gary; Malcolm, Rodney; Delainey, David W.; Hughes, James A.; Dimichele, Rich; Haedicke, Mark E.; Colwell, Wes; Causey, Richard; Oxley, David; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Buy, Rick; Bradford, William S.; Leff, Dan; Murphy, Ted; Fallon, Jim
Cc:	McMahon, Jeffrey; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Post Petition Organization

All,

We had a preliminary meeting on Friday.  The attached is a summary of the matrix we developed as well as changes from subsequent e-mails.  Note, only one name has been placed in the matrix where two may have been suggested - if the name is not correct then please e-mail me back as soon as possible - only person per box please.  The names placed in the matrix will be directly responsible to the estate.

We need to meet Monday to: (1) agree on the matrix; (2) develop detailed processes for capturing value (trade books, structured deals, hard assets and business sales); (3) understand the approval process required on a go forward basis; (4) develop compensation / retention program for estate, (5) address any administrative concerns.

If you have not done so, please check the names in the matrix to ensure that they are correct and please send me any changes as well as their full names to be utilized for future e-mails.

Regards,

Jim

 << File: REORG1.doc >>


November 7, 2000

     Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron;   71.250 / HPL IFERC


Thanks for taking the time to discuss the Enron Advisory Council today.  I
think the second topic you mentioned "Escaping the Inherent Limits of
Success" would be a great discussion starter.  I'll add it to the agenda and
look forward to seeing you there.


Susan:  Yet another name to deal with!  It appears that Paul opened my
original memo a day late.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2000 08:03 AM -----

	Paul Simons
	05/24/2000 04:13 AM

		 To: Sue Kelly/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Investments plc ("EIplc") - new brokerage account

Sue - can you help with this? Thanks - Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 24/05/2000 10:10
---------------------------

Mark Elliott
24/05/2000 09:46
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Investments plc ("EIplc") - new brokerage account

Apologies, Sara, but I have no info on this.

Kind regards

Mark

From: Sara Shackleton on 22/05/2000 11:12 CDT
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Investments plc ("EIplc") - new brokerage account

All:  Sheila and I have been trying to coordinate the account(s) to receive
the shares of the above entity.  I can't locate the company on the corporate
database.  My understanding is that CF First Boston will receive the shares
and then transfer to our Morgan account (upon our instructions).

CF First Boston has an Enron Corp. account (pre-1994) and can open a
subaccount for EIplc.  However, two (2) items are required:
(1)  a letter of beneficiary ownership
(2)  Is EIplc a regulated UK company?  If the answer is no, then it (or the
company reporting for it) must provide a net  asset valuation

Has someone in London already handled these issues?  If not, can one of you
supply me with that information?  We have spoken with Andrew Bracken in
London (0207 888 3196) at andrew.bracken@csfb.com

Thanks for your help.  Sara