Take a look and let me know what you think.  Also, please check the volumes.
ENA's bid is in yellow.


thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baxter, Bryce
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Bike, Anne; Valdes, John; Palmer, B. Scott; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	After Hours Numbers

If you need to reach me after for any reason, here are my numbers:

281-450-6338 - Cell
281-647-9767 -- Home


FYI.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	AvenueB2E <enron@avenueb2e.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	ClickAtHome Order Verification

The ClickAtHome Database shows that you have placed an order with Dell Computer with an order number of 688296201. Please read below for instructions:

1.  If this is correct, enjoy your computer!
    You can check your order status by clicking here:
      http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp

      ** For questions about your order/changes/problems,
         call 1-866-220-3355 **

2.  If you did NOT place an order with Dell for the ClickAtHome program,
    please email enron@avenueb2e.com or call 713-895-9001 to report
    the incorrect order on your behalf.

3.  DELL OFFERS A 30 DAY NO QUESTIONS ASKED RETURN POLICY.
    THE 30 DAYS BEGINS FROM THE DAY YOUR PC IS SHIPPED FROM DELL.
    YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RETURN YOUR PC AFTER THE 30 DAY PERIOD HAS PASSED.
    IF FOR ANY REASON, YOU BELIEVE YOU MAY NEED TO RETURN YOUR PC
    (INCLUDE FOR REPAIR OR SERVICE ISSUES), YOU MUST CALL DELL AT
    1-866-220-3355 BEFORE THE END OF THE 30 DAY PERIOD AND RECEIVE
    A RETURN AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. YOU MUST HAVE THIS NUMBER
    BEFORE THE END OF THE 30 DAYS.

Thank you!

ClickAtHome Team!


Jordan Mintz - Please call 713- 853-9211 for this meeting. Thanks.


Hunter asked me to fill in for him yesterday because he was out of the office.  I had an emergency and could not call the list.  Please let me know how to proceed.  Would you like me to call them today.

Thanks,
Mike


We will not be there next week so that should be fine.  Are the complex derivatives group and 'structured book' run by Paul Darcy the same thing?  If yes, then we are planning on reviewing that area.  Should I contact Paul Darcy directly?  If no, what is the complex derivatives group?

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Also in addition can you please confirm that you are not doing the complex derivatives group which is run totally separately in both personnel and risk terms ?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	25 October 2001 18:03
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Are you here next week then because I am due to be away for some of that time ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	25 October 2001 17:47
To:	New, James
Subject:	UK & Continental Power Doorstep

James,

Just a quick note and request regarding our UK & Continental Power Doorstep review we will be performing.  Please provide a list of books, curves and deal types used for UK & Continental Power.  In addition, please send information on any large, structured, out of the norm transactions and any transactions that are calculated outside of the core trading system.

Please provide this information early next week.  Look forward to seeing you.

Stacey


Sean:
As i am now in the power trading group, if any changes need to be made to the
financial GTC's for this counterparty, please contact either Mark Taylor or
Sara Shackleton.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


The commission has issued a new rulemaking, R. 00-02-003, to address CEQA
review for CLECs.
Parties should file their responses to the following questions no later than
March 15, 2000.

1. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs adequate
to comply with CEQA and to protect California's environmental resources?
2. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent local exchange
carriers and cellular carriers to construct new facilities without
environmental review in compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate
protection of California's environmental resources?
3. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate
opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set
of Commission practices and policies regarding incumbent local exchange
carriers and CLECs? If not, how should this circumstance be remedied?
4. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs create a
competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers? If so, how might
those disparities be eliminated or reduced?
5. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance
carriers adequate to comply with CEQA and to protect California's
environmental resources?
6. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent long distance
carriers to construct new facilities without environmental review in
compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate protection of California's
environmental resources?
7. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate
opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set
of Commission practices and policies regarding long distance carriers? If
not, how should this circumstance be remedied?
8. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance
carriers create a competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers?
If so, how might those disparities be eliminated or reduced?

Are we interested in this proceeding? Attached is a copy of the rulemaking.


Barbara,
 I am not sure whether my response was sent or not yesterday.  My Notes Mail
crashed every time I tried to send an email.  The reason that I suggested
that Entex Gas Marketing and Mercado remain with their affiliated
distribution utility is that transactions with these entities are usually
behind the city gate, transactions usually bounce between the utility and the
marketing entity until a decision is made by the counterparty.  In the past
we have documented transactions as being with the marketing entity and Entex
has requested that they be with the utility, also the reverse has occurred.
However, if the utility will set up different marketing reps to keep the
business straight, then we should be okay with moving the marketing to HPL.

Barbara N Gray
05/26/99 01:49 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ECT and HPLR contracts not to be transferred to HPL

dan please explain why you think that the entex gas marketing k and mercad
gas services k should remain in ect.


Rosalee:

Please forward the following materials to Ken Lay, pursuant to his
conversation with Rob Bradley yesterday.

Please call me on (203) 464-1541 and let me know whether a conference call
with myself and Joel Bluestein is necessary for 2:30 central/3:30 eastern
today.

Thank you.

Jeff

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


Joe,

I have written to Pal Quilkey to invite Christian Werner to Houston
for a week to discuss how much of his research we can use.

Vince

Joseph Hrgovcic
08/01/2000 06:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince,

 I have inquired into Christian's climate models. It seems to me like a long
term project. Chiristian says that his model might be able to do better than
the Australian Met given that they ignore some of the variables he uses and
that they are an "old boy's network"  resistant to new developments, but I
don't think the same can be said of most other weather services. As far as
the NWS goes, they run their model on a Cray, they have several very talented
PhD's working on it full-time,  and even then, they can only get a dozen or
so runs per night. In other words, it's a huge system. Replicating something
even close to that will not be an easy task.

 That being said, I think there are related applications that we could look
into.  Since I've already promised the RAC group and the weather desk's PJM
traders to put together a Vector AutoRegressive model of daily temperatures,
I think it makes sense to see if something better than a VAR model can be put
together, perhaps a very stripped down version of the kind of model Christian
has. What I have in mind is something  that would give us say, up to several
dozens of "possible" temperature forecasts every morning, which would be
calculated using actual climate models (as opposed to time series models). I
would not use this as a forecasting tool (the NWS model results would make a
far better  "best guess"), but our ensemble could still be used to provide a
distribution of temperature scenarios. This ensemble would have several uses:

 1) we could price the book for the ensemble of runs and thereby obtain a
more realistic daily V@R for the Weather Book (and eventually interface that
with the power desk's V@R calculations)

 2) we could use the ensemble of forecasts to relate temperature forecasts to
week-ahead CDD and HDD distributions (for use in our demand swaps)

 3)  if Freese-Notis were to give us one of their qualitative forecasts,
e.g., "expect the trough to recede" we could sort through the different Monte
Carlo scenarions, find one in which the trough in question is receding, and
use corresponding output statistics to download the actual temperatures
corresponding to that scenario. Up till now, we haven't found a good way of
getting a numerical fix on what different forecasts actually mean
temperature-wise

 4) we could use the associated visualization routines that come with such
models to get animations of the evolution of historical weather patterns. The
traders could use these in order to look for historical periods which roughly
match current weather conditions and get an idea of what could happen;
although these meteorological models would not be good for simulating
month-ahead or season-ahead weather (trust me on this) we could still use the
visualization technology to do to analogous seasonal animations.

 Just today, I've spoken with Dr. Jacobsen of Stanford University, who has
written one of the more recent textbooks on climate forecasting , and who
worked with UCLA's general circulation model.  He says that getting a
simplified version of MM5 (which is itself a simplified, limited-area version
of the GCM models that NWS, COLA, and UCLA use) would take several months to
implement,  assuming the people involved are already well versed in the
technology. Also, I have contacted AER, a Massachusetts- based weather
consulting firm, and they tell me that they have a MM5 model running daily
(only one run per night), and also some smaller PC models up and running.
They are of course willing to work with us for a fee. Their MM5 version runs
on a $200,000 parallel processor.

 I am open to your suggestions (or objections as the case may be). I'm not
sure how the costs would be apportioned given that this would benefit all of
Enron, and not just the weather desk.

 I am scheduled to go to Boston next week anyway, and would like to use the
opportunity to visit with AER. I will of course coordinate any projects with
Christian (if we get something like this up and running it will be more
likely that he can get the computing power he needs to run his own Australian
model).

Joe


Here's the extent of what I know about Chicago.
---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:27 AM ---------------------------
From: Lynn Pikofsky@ENRON on 02/09/2001 10:26 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hi,
I just spoke with Laura.  She said she was going to try to call you today,
she is in transit back to Chicago.  She apologized for the delay, but things
were worse than expected with her son.  Let me know if I can help.
So sorry

Lynn


Please disregard Parking receipt sent January 31, 2002.  Updated receipt will be sent shortly.

Thank You.


Enjoy!
 - 20010924ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20010924ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


See attached.


John,

Here's ABB's wiring instructions:

The  wire transfer has to be sent to ABB Trafo, S.A.  Our bank  coordenates
and account number are:

  Bank : Deutsche Bank
  Address : Calle Concepci?n 4
             14008 Cordoba-Spain
  Swift Code  : DEUTESBB
  Account no. : 0019 0481 18 4010007594

Notice should be sentto:

ABB Trafo
Michael Sandridge
P. O. Box 42802
Houston, Tx 77242-2802

facsimile: (713) 821-3527

Comments to the assignment will come separately.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Brenna Neves/NA/Enron on 12/01/2000 03:18
PM ---------------------------

sam.neves@luminant.com on 12/01/2000 03:26:59 PM
To: mneves@enron.com, brenna.neves@enron.com, rneves@fishgame.com,
aneves@fishgame.com, amy_neves@aimfunds.com
cc:

Subject: chicken head

I don't know about you guys, but I'm in the mood for fried chicken (heads) :)
----- Forwarded by Sam Neves/Luminant on 12/01/00 03:19 PM -----

	Lona Kavanagh

	12/01/00 12:47 PM
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?Sam Neves/Luminant@Luminant
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?chicken head

heard about this? ?anye sent it to me - it's hilarious looking. ?be sure to
watch the news clip at the bottom.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7669-2000Nov30.html

Lona Kavanagh
lona.kavanagh@luminant.com
713.479.7131
713.479.7101 fax
_____________________________________________________________
Luminant Worldwide
http://www.luminant.com


?

A:\MAVICA.HTM;A:\MVC-001S.411;A:\MVC-001S.JPG;A:\MVC-002S.411;A:\MVC-002S.JPG;
A:\MVC-003S.411;A:\MVC-003S.JPG;A:\MVC-004S.411;A:\MVC-004S.JPG;A:\MVC-005S.41
1;A:\MVC-005S.JPG;A:\MVC-006S.411;A:\MVC-006S.JPG;A:\MVC-007S.411;A:\MVC-007S.
JPG;A:\MVC-008S.411;A:\MVC-008S.JPG;A:\MVC-009S.411;A:\MVC-009S.JPG;A:\MVC-010
S.411;A:\MVC-010S.JPG;A:\MVC-011S.411;A:\MVC-011S.JPG;A:\MVC-012S.411;A:\MVC-0
12S.JPG;A:\MVC-013S.411;A:\MVC-013S.JPG;A:\MVC-014S.411;A:\MVC-014S.JPG;A:\MVC
-015S.411;A:\MVC-015S.JPG;A:\MVC-016S.411;A:\MVC-016S.JPG;A:\MVC-017S.411;A:\M
VC-017S.JPG;A:\MVC-018S.411;A:\MVC-019S.411;A:\MVC-019S.JPG;A:\MVC-020S.411;A:
\MVC-020S.JPG;A:\MVC-021S.411;A:\MVC-022S.411;A:\MVC-022S.JPG;A:\MVC-023S.411;
A:\MVC-023S.JPG;A:\MVC-024S.411;A:\MVC-024S.JPG;A:\MVC-025S.411;A:\MVC-026S.41
1;A:\MVC-026S.JPG;A:\MVC-027S.411;A:\MVC-028S.411;A:\MVC-028S.JPG;A:\MVC-029S.
411;A:\MVC-029S.JPG;A:\MVC-030S.411;A:\MVC-030S.JPG;A:\MVC-031S.411;A:\MVC-031
S.JPG;A:\MVC-032S.411;A:\MVC-032S.JPG
 - MAVICA.HTM
 - MVC-001S.411
 - MVC-001S.JPG
 - MVC-002S.411
 - MVC-002S.JPG
 - MVC-003S.411
 - MVC-003S.JPG
 - MVC-004S.411
 - MVC-004S.JPG
 - MVC-005S.411
 - MVC-005S.JPG
 - MVC-006S.411
 - MVC-006S.JPG
 - MVC-007S.411
 - MVC-007S.JPG
 - MVC-008S.411
 - MVC-008S.JPG
 - MVC-009S.411
 - MVC-009S.JPG
 - MVC-010S.411
 - MVC-010S.JPG
 - MVC-011S.411
 - MVC-011S.JPG
 - MVC-012S.411
 - MVC-012S.JPG
 - MVC-013S.411
 - MVC-013S.JPG
 - MVC-014S.411
 - MVC-014S.JPG
 - MVC-015S.411
 - MVC-015S.JPG
 - MVC-016S.411
 - MVC-016S.JPG
 - MVC-017S.411
 - MVC-017S.JPG
 - MVC-018S.411
 - MVC-019S.411
 - MVC-019S.JPG
 - MVC-020S.411
 - MVC-020S.JPG
 - MVC-021S.411
 - MVC-022S.411
 - MVC-022S.JPG
 - MVC-023S.411
 - MVC-023S.JPG
 - MVC-024S.411
 - MVC-024S.JPG
 - MVC-025S.411
 - MVC-026S.411
 - MVC-026S.JPG
 - MVC-027S.411
 - MVC-028S.411
 - MVC-028S.JPG
 - MVC-029S.411
 - MVC-029S.JPG
 - MVC-030S.411
 - MVC-030S.JPG
 - MVC-031S.411
 - MVC-031S.JPG
 - MVC-032S.411
 - MVC-032S.JPG


Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
BEAR Holiday Fundraiser
2001 Holiday Shopping Card benefiting the American Cancer Society
Enron Kids 2001 Holiday Program
Support the Museum of Natural Science at the Crate & Barrel Opening Night Preview Party
Enron Night with the Houston Aeros
Free Carwashes for Enron Employees
American Heart Association "Heart Walk"

Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Volunteer for the 2001 Nutcracker Market "A World of Holiday Shopping"

Enron Wellness
CPR/First Aid Training
Mammogram Screening
November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month

Involved Employees
Par "Fore" Pets Golf Tournament

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


NEW DIALING INSTRUCTIONS

To:          All Enron Houston Users

Subject:   New Dialing Instructions

Ref:   Tie Line Access Code Changes - Enron Houston Users

Just a reminder, the access codes for remote locations were modified within the Enron Building phone system.  The modifications will affect users as follows:

1.        We have changed the first digit dialed when accessing the Tie Lines from 7 to 8.  This change will only affect Enron Building users.
2.        The second and third digits of the London, Calgary, Omaha, and Portland tie lines have also changed.  This change will affect all users.  All other digits of existing dial strings will remain the same.  For your reference, a list of the new dial strings is identified in the table below.

REVISED DIAL STRINGS FOR ENRON TIE LINE NETWORK
Users must dial 8 digits to call via Tie Lines

Enron Location	Old String	New String
Beijing	7 810 XXXX	8 810 XXXX
Buenos Aires	7 900 XXXX	8 900 XXXX
Calgary	7 403 XXXX	8 283 XXXX
Caracas	7 58 XXXXX	8 58 XXXXX
Chicago	7 220 XXXX	8 220 XXXX
Dahbol India	7 812 XXXX	8 812 XXXX
Hinsdale	7 235 XXXX	8 235 XXXX
London	7 830 XXXXX	8 44 XXXXX
Monterey	7 152 2XXX	8 152 2XXX
New York	7 212 XXXX	8 212 XXXX
New York Metals	7 211 XXXX	8 211 XXXX
Omaha	7 87 XXXX	8 287 XXXX
Portland	7 834 XXXX	8 234 XXXX
Rio De Janiero	7 920 XXXX	8 920 XXXX
Sao Paulo	7 910 XXXX	8 910 XXXX
Sydney	7 800 XXXX	8 800 XXXX
Tokyo	7 860 XXXX	8 860 XXXX
Toronto	7 285 XXXX	8 285 XXXX
Washington DC (Future)	N/A	8 245 XXXX

* X represents an extension number


Michelle,

Please send the revised agreements when you get a chance.  I spoke to Mike B. this afternoon and agreed to move the deadline to Friday, August 17, 2001.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Simpkins, Michelle" <MSimpkins@winstead.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Simpkins+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSimpkins+40winstead+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	'pallen@enron.com'; 'pallen70@hotmail.com'
Cc:	'michaelb@amhms.com'; 'adelag@amhms.com'
Subject:	Utility Construction Escrow Agreement (Allen/AMHP)

 <<Utility Construction Escrow AM (AMHPLeander).DOC>>

Phillip,

Enclosed is the Utility Construction Escrow Agreement for your execution in
connection with the closing on the property located in Leander, Texas.
Please review the enclosed document and contact me at (512) 370-2836 or Mike
Bobinchuck with any questions or concerns.  Thanks.

Michelle L. Simpkins
Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800
Austin, Texas  78701
(512) 370-2836
(512) 370-2850 Fax
msimpkins@winstead.com

 - Utility Construction Escrow AM (AMHPLeander).DOC << File: Utility Construction Escrow AM (AMHPLeander).DOC >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000
10:42 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Grant Masson                           07/25/2000 10:16 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: R web site

FYI

http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/

My first impressions are that R/S can be quite powerful but is not as
intuitive as it might be (e.g. it has taken me quite some time to understand
how to manipulate and collate data sets.)
For this reason, I have ordered a "Basics of S" book from Amazon.  If it
turns out to be useful, I will pass on the title to you.

Grant.


----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 02/08/01 09:45 AM -----

	Marie Hejka
	02/08/01 09:46 AM

		 To: Anthony Mends/Enron Communications, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT, Allen
Elliott/HOU/ECT, John Gillespie/Corp/Enron, Pegi Newhouse/HOU/EES, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron, Allan Sommer/Corp/Enron, Judith Schlesinger/HOU/ECT,
Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron, Paul Timberlake/ET&S/Enron, Steve
Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: IM Task Force Meeting Notes 02/07

Information Management  02/07/01
IM Task Force Meeting Notes - 02/07/01

Attendees
Steve Kean
Debbie Brackett
Allen Elliott
John Gillespie
Marie Hejka
Georgeanna Hoiseth
Anthony Mends
Pegi Newhouse
Brandon Rigney
Allan Sommer
Judith Schlesinger
Kathy Schultea
Paul Timberlake
George Wasaff
Joe Wong
Steve Woods

Meeting Details (Important &To Do,s8 Please review red highlights.)

IM Strategy Proposal.
Steve Kean joined the task force for a project review and to discuss if one
executive sponsor and one senior coordinator for IM should be appointed.  Per
Steve's recommendation, the task force should consider Steve as the executive
sponsor for the project.  No senior coordinator for the effort will be
appointed until some incremental successes are achieved.  Steve referenced
the Louise Kitchen/Enron Online experience where Louise and team, independent
of their day jobs, developed and launched Enron Online without budget or
traditional sponsorship.  We should continue operating in this vein.  Steve
will be available to place calls to the BU/FUs to rally support.  Our focus
should remain on identifying and developing sticky portal applications to
improve the flow of information which ultimately should increase the flow of
revenue.  Steve's message to IM Task Force:  do what it takes to make it
happen.

During the discussion with Steve, we reviewed HP's best practices portal.
Steve would like to view the HP demonstration of their best practices
portal.  Assignment:  Marie work with Maureen McVicker to identify a time
Allan Sommer and HP are available for demo.  Allan Sommer to arrange a demo
of this application at next week's task force meeting.

Assignment:  All task force members are encouraged to generate "killer"
application ideas.  Be prepared to submit your list of five "killer
applications" at next week's IM meeting.  Note, Allen Elliott's IT team will
need these next week to begin development work on these recommendations.
Review Pegi Newhouse's list of HP portal applications below.

Some features from the HP Portal which Price-Waterhouse Coopers demonstrated
include:
@HP
Email
Voice mail
Fax
Stocks
Weather
Corporate News (which remains on everyone's page---it can't be taken off)
Local News
External News
Nanny Cam
Life
HR Benefits (401K balance, detailed descriptions, etc. This was a link into
their outsourced benefits provider Hewitt Assoc.)
Life Events check lists
-Marriage Checklist (what you processes/forms you will need to access--to
save you time)
-Divorce Checklist (a longer list than previous!)
-Childbirth Checklist
Moving Online forms
Brokerage Firms to check fund performance and stock options
HMO Info at a Glance
Full Health Information
Job
Purchase Equipment
Travel bookings
PC tech support
Skills Inventory (similar to expert finder)
Personal Career Gap analysis (does gap analysis on what training you need to
accomplish your goals)
eLearning (based on your skills and position, it will suggest training you
need with links to course info)
Recruiting
Package tracker (track your UPS, FedEx packages)
Workspace
Pending tasks
Product Information
Contacts
My tool box (databases/ tools that you use, your applications)
Workgroup tools (chat room)
Calendar
Org Chart
Management Reports

*Another important feature: Single Sign on!   Many of these items link to
external sites but it is all seamless to the user.
Look & feel remains consistent throughout.  NOTE: HP saw measurable benefits
were realized when they were able to renegotiate their service agreement with
their benefits provider (outsourced like ours) because people had all of the
information at their fingertips and call volume decreased
significantly.

Portal.
Allen Elliott's team has begun development work for the respective BU/FUs.
Allen will be meeting with Brandon Rigney this week to discuss "look and
feel".

There is a Single Sign on Task Force meeting every Thursday morning at 10:00
in EB1841.  John Gillespie will be sending representation to this meeting
this week.  Feel free to attend these meetings.  Integral to our best
practices portal is a single sign application entry.

UDM/ESE.
Inktomi and Verity appear to be the choice contenders.  Autonomy requires
work on individual employees.  The task force does not expect Enron's culture
would support this requirement.  Debbie Brackett will be working with the
Software Selection Team to negotiate UDM/ESE pilot participants.

Paul collected high level pricing for each vendor.  Below is a table of that
information.  Paul is working with GSS's Peter Goebel to gain additional
pricing support. Note, Paul's final report has extensive licensing
information for each vendor.

Vendor	Initial Cost	Annual Support & Maintenance
Autonomy	$3,000,000	$540,000 / year support
Inktomi	$1,375,000	$206,250 / year support
Verity	$682,500
	($487,500  +  $162,500 + $32,500)	$130,000 / year support


This is part of the info Select agreed to send.  Ed Sacks has seen it.
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:36 AM -----

	morisjr@selectenergy.com
	05/03/2001 10:53 AM

		 To: Edward.Sacks@enron.com, Janice.R.Moore@enron.com
		 cc: lemelpe@NU.COM, moonevw@selectenergy.com
		 Subject: NU Organization

Ed,  Attached is the org chart.  It isn't pretty, but I think it will work.
John

---------------------- Forwarded by John R. Morissette/NUS on 05/03/2001
11:52 AM ---------------------------

Lois P. Chiovoloni
05/03/2001 11:38 AM
703-2306
RISK ASSESS

To:   John R. Morissette/NUS@NU
cc:
Subject:  NU Organization

Parent/Subsidiary Relationship                State of Incorporation

Northeast Utilities MA (Business Trust)
     Charter Oak Energy, Inc.                      CT
          COE Argentina II Corp.                   CT
          COE Ave Fenix Corporation                CT
          COE Development Corporation              CT
     The Connecticut Light and Power Company            CT
          CL&P Receivables Corporation             CT
     Holyoke Water Power Company              MA
          Holyoke Power and Electric Company       MA
     North Atlantic Energy Corporation             NH
     North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation          NH
     Northeast Nuclear Energy Company              CT
     Northeast Utilities Service Company                CT
     NU Enterprises, Inc.                          CT
          HEC Inc.                            MA
               HEC Energy Consulting Canada Inc.        CANADA
               HEC/Tobyhanna Energy Project, Inc.            MA
               Reeds Ferry Supply Co., Inc.             NH
               Select Energy Contracting, Inc.               MA
          Mode 1 Communications, Inc.              CT
          Northeast Generation Company             CT
          Northeast Generation Services Company         CT
               E. S. Boulos Company                     CT
               NGS Mechanical, Inc.                     CT
          Select Energy, Inc.                           CT
          Select Energy Portland Pipeline, Inc.         CT
     Public Service Company of New Hampshire            NH
          Properties, Inc.                         NH
     The Quinnehtuk Company                   MA
     The Rocky River Realty Company                CT
     Western Massachusetts Electric Company        MA
     Yankee Energy System, Inc.                    CT
          NorConn Properties, Inc.                           CT
          R. M. Services, Inc.                               CT
          Yankee Energy Financial Services Company      CT
          Yankee Energy Services Company           CT
          Yankee Gas Services Company              CT

INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
                                              AND PARENT COMPANY

The Connecticut Steam Company                           CT          CL&P
Electric Power Incorporated                                  CT          CL&P
The Nutmeg Power Company                                     CT          CL&P
Housatonic Corporation                                  CT          YES
Yankee Energy Marketing Company                              CT          YES

Home | Corporate Services | Your Job | Enterprise Planning | NU A-Z | Weather
| Maps | Phone | Contact Us
,Northeast Utilities Service Company 1996-2001 Northeast Utilities. All
Rights Reserved.
Pagemaster: Kay Comendul, comenok@nu.com

Page last modified: 1-25-2001


On November 17, 2001 between 01:00 and 05:00 Entergy will be switching to an OASIS node provided by ESCA. During the outage customers will NOT have access to the current OASIS site provided by MAIN. Once the OASIS comes back online there will be a link at the current OASIS site provided by MAIN that will direct customers to the new OASIS site provided by ESCA. Once the new OASIS node is up, the customers should not have any trouble accessing the site.

You have received this email because your email address is listed as a valid customer email with Tradewave.  If you feel you have received this email in error, please contact your system administrator and have your profile changed or removed from Tradewave.

Entergy Transmission Operations


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041408.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  34.44)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_EPE
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  13.80)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:   8.20)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred: 270.00 / Final: 265.20)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  75.00 / Final:  63.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   4.91 / Final:   4.12)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  44.89 / Final:  36.92)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2000
05:03 PM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/01/2000 04:15:11 PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Carthage (American Central) Nomination

Chad called and said you guys are requestiing approximately 74,000 MMBtu
effective June 1.  I show the number should be 72,240 MMBtu/d.  Could you
please check into this and let me know what's going on?

Thanks,
Steve


Edith,

- Substation location: Sayerville
- Gas: Transco Zone 6 (no additional cost for LDC)
- Unit contingent call
- 97% availability: It should be OK since we can assume 97% during summer
time and 90~93% during non-summer time, for example.

Could you get the pricing for following scenario based on above assumption?

Flat and annual capacity payment for 3 and 5 year
With 16 hour block and 4 hour block

Please call me, if it doesn't make sense.

Jinsung (Ext: 37330)


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042801.txt


Yes, the 21st works for me.  I already made the mistake of mentioning the
14th to Susan and she reminded me what day it was.  Mark


In the past few months, the procedures for setting up new curves and books
have not been followed by everyone.

The following memo documents the procedures to 1) set up a new curve, 2) set
up a new book, and 3) change a portfolio hierarchy.  Please note that risk
management (for each commodity group), "risk management"  is responsible for
ensuring that information is flowing appropriately between the valuation
systems and RisktRAC (Risk Analysis and Reporting can help, but do not have
all of the ERMS information to be able to ensure the completeness of
RisktRAC).

I have attached the request form for each of these changes at the bottom of
this memo.  Please ensure that everyone in your group obtains a copy.

The procedure to set up a new curve is as follows:

Trader starts trading at a new location or a new commodity and needs a new
curve set up
Trader communicates this to risk management
Risk management constructs new curve in ERMS (with the help of the IT
department)
Risk management completes a curve set up request form to set up curve in
RisktRAC
Curve form is forwarded to Risk Analysis and Reporting
Risk Analysis and Reporting sets up curve in RisktRAC
A system generated message is sent to people on the "curve list" indicating a
change in the RisktRAC curves has been made

If the curve is not set up in RisktRAC the positions are not captured in the
VAR or engine, thereby making VAR inaccurate.  As a side note, Risk Analysis
and Reporting has implemented a new process in which on a weekly basis new
curves set up in ERMS are reviewed to ensure that these have been set up in
RisktRAC.  We did this for the first time today and noted numerous curves in
ERMS that are not in RisktRAC - which we are working with you to resolve.

The procedure to set up a new book in RisktRAC is as follows:

Trader/risk management determines new book is needed
New book request form (for RisktRAC) is completed by risk management
New book request form is forwarded to Risk Analysis and Reporting
Risk Analysis and Reporting sets up book in RisktRAC
Risk Analysis and Reporting forwards request to ERMS administrator and global
counterparty group to request that book is set up in valuation and
counterparty systems
Once all groups have completed their individual set ups, a final e-mail is
sent to personnel on the "books list" and the book administrator in the risk
management department who requested the book

It is important that there is a one to one link between the ERMS and RisktRAC
books, or not all positions will be captured in RisktRAC (two commodities per
ERMS book does not flow properly into RisktRAC).

The above two processes have formally existed for a number of months.
Additionally, we are formalizing the procedure for changing portfolio
hierarchies.  The procedure now is:

Risk management is responsible for requesting all portfolio hierarchy
changes.  Previously, changes could be made through a request by Risk
Analysis and Reporting or RAC.  These two groups are no longer allowed to
submit change requests.  All requests must come through risk management.
Risk management completes a request, including the reason for the requested
change in structure
Risk management forwards the request to Risk Analysis and Reporting
Risk Analysis and Reporting makes the change and notifies risk management
that the change has been made.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns, please call: me X39123,
Chris Abel X33012, Burton McIntyre X57197, or Susan Trevino X31462.

Thanks,

Shona


Dear Jeff:

Nice meeting today. Attached please find 1-pager you requested.

Thanks,
Joe Alcantara
 - DearJeff.doc


Use number 12: Transco Zone 6


BROADCAST MESSAGE TO ALL PILOTS:

Have a safe and wonderful Thanksgiving. Thank you for all you do for me and Angel Flight. God Bless you and your families at this special time of year.

I currently have 12 pending missions. I realize it is a holiday next week but if you can fly please call or email the office as soon as possible. I need to fill the remaining 4 missions through 11/27 before we leave TODAY.

1 for MONDAY		1.  Hot Springs to Houston (leg 1 of 2 leg mission)

3 for TUESDAY		1.  San Antonio to Houston (leg 2 of 3 leg mission)

				1.  Addison to Houston (leg 2 of 2 leg mission)

				1.  Jackson, MS to Atlanta, GA (leg 3 of 3 leg mission)

4 for WEDNESDAY		1.  New Orleans to Houston (leg 2 of 2 leg mission)

				1.  Plainview, TX to Dallas

				1.  Houston to Hot Springs, AR (leg 1 of 2 leg mission)

				1.  Houston to San Angelo (leg 1 of 2 leg mission)

thank you
Beth and Shireen
972 458 0700
afsc@angelflightsc.org


No need to apologize for keeping me out Wednesday night, it was probably more
a case of me keeping myself out (I have been known to do that on occasion).
I'm sorry I didn't return your call yesterday, but I had a pretty crazy day
here and that mixed with me only running on about two cylinders effectively
cut me off from the outside world.  As for being upset about anything, don't
worry I'm not.  You know me well enough to know that my actions are my own.
I'm not sure if I'm going to stay in Austin Saturday night or not, but in
case I do my cell # is 281-844-0866.

Susan

I'll see you at Purvi's happy hour if you end up going.


Mark - Is this something you think we need to monitor?

No. 41
Thursday March 1, 2001	Page A-1
	ISSN 1523-567X
	Regulation, Law & Economics

	Electronic Commerce
SEC Planning Rulemaking
In Wake of ESign Legislation

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced Feb. 28 that it is planning
several rulemaking actions with respect to recordkeeping requirements in
light of the recently enacted Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act--ESign.
ESign's record retention provisions will become effective June 1, the agency
advised.
In its release, the SEC noted that under the federal securities laws,
regulated entities--including broker-dealers, transfer agents, investment
companies, investment advisers, and public utility holding companies, must
keep certain records of their activities. According to the SEC, such entities
currently may keep certain records electronically, "subject to standards
designed to protect investors' interests, the financial stability of
regulated entities and generally to further the purposes of the federal
securities laws."

Remove Impediments

"ESign," the SEC continued, "is intended to remove unnecessary impediments to
the use of electronic records in commerce, while preserving the ability of
agencies like the Commission to reconcile ESign's policy with the statutes
they administer." In its release, the agency said it plans shortly to provide
interpretive guidance, and, where appropriate, "propose or adopt rules
consistent with ESign. These releases will be published separately in the
Federal Register," the commission noted.
It added that because ESign does not generally apply to information required
to be filed with government agencies, the commission is not currently
contemplating any changes to its existing filing rules as a result of ESign.
"Filers should therefore continue to follow current filing rules," the agency
advised.
For more information, contact: Michael A. Macchiaroli, Associate Director,
(202) 942-0131; Thomas K. McGowan, Assistant Director, (202) 942-4886;
Randall W. Roy, Special Counsel, (202) 942-0798, or Mathew Comstock,
Attorney, (202) 942-0156, Division of Market Regulation (for broker-dealers);
Larry E. Bergmann, Associate Director (202) 942-0770; Jerry Carpenter,
Assistant Director; David Karasik, Special Counsel, (202) 942-4187, Division
of Market Regulation (for transfer agents); Martha B. Peterson, Special
Counsel, Office of Regulatory Policy, Division of Investment Management (202)
942-0690; Victoria J. Adraktas, Attorney-Advisor at the Office of Public
Utility Regulation (202) 942-0545; Mark Borges, Attorney-Advisor, Office of
Rulemaking, Division of Corporation Finance, (202) 942-2900.

Copyright , 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington D.C.


Fred,

Is the ABB transformer currently in existence (already delivered)?

Thanks,

Kay


Find attached the EGM Management Summary, Radar Screens and Hot List as of 10/26.  Please contact me if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff


Attached is a list of EES retail issues regarding the matters we discussed
yesterday.  We are beginning to track down answers to these issues, and we
look forward to coordinating our efforts.  MDS


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

prelim


Susan:

Yes.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elledge, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	PG&E Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement 96060224

Jeff,

I was in the process of updating the referenced contract with the third amendment, and I noticed that Houston Pipe Line Company is still an active party (in the Global record, at least).  Should HPLC be removed from the record?

Thanks,
Susan


To accommodate the students who wish to attend the Paul Newman talk, we've
changed the time for the MBA Club Night.? The talk should end by 6:15.
heidi

Come to Club Night!
Thursday, September 7

NEW TIME? 6:00 - 8:00

Haas Courtyard

Look forward to seeing you there!
Heidi
p.s.? An updated list of clubs will soon be available on the MBAA website.


The scholarships, while sponsored by Enron, are technically awarded by UT.  I
will be talking with Sue White today, and I will get her take on whether or
not the university wants to contact the winners or whether Enron should do
it.  I will let you know.

The 24th is a great day for me for the dinner in Austin.  So if that works
for recepients and faculty, then that would work our well.  Keep me posted.
--Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans @ ENRON                           04/06/2000 08:49 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Lee, Charla
Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Thanks, Sally, for the update.  The only day that Rick is available is
Monday, April 24 - this definitely limits us! I've asked Sharron to find out
if others can't make it on the 24th (the recipients, Dean May, interviewers),
would he rather have it on another day that week without him or have it in
the fall once school starts again. Sharron will let me know what Rick says
today.  Then, I'll call Sue White to start getting the ball rolling with
schedules on campus.  I've tentatively booked Jeffrey's private room again
for the 24th.

Do you want me to notify the winners?  I'm happy to do so.

Elyse

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           04/05/2000 06:20 PM

To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

We interviewed the 12 finalists in Austin yesterday.   Interviewers were Gene
Humphrey, Thomas Suffield, Roger Ondrecko and me.  The four of us met this
morning in Houston to decide on our suggested scholarship receipients.  Based
on my conversation with Sue White yesterday in Austin, I called her today
with the names of the three suggested award winners.  I conveyed this via
voice mail, as Sue was not in her office.  She had told me that her schedule
would be tight today, so it is likely that she and I will talk tomorrow
morning.  She wanted to be able to discuss our recommendations.  I would not
anticipate any changes as a result of my pending conversation with Sue.
However, I think that it will be best to withhold the names of the recepients
until after that conversation.  She will most likely then contact you to
confirm their names.  I have phone numbers, addresses and e:mail addresses
for all three, and I will provide you with those as soon as the official
notification from the University takes place.

Gene, Thomas and Roger are all interested in attending the dinner in Austin
if schedules permit.  The week of April 24th is a good one for me for the
dinner.  Obviously, many schedules have to be coordinated.  I know that Rick
Causey will want to attend (he will have been in London the week prior, so he
may be available).  I have also talked with CIndy Olson and I know that she
would like to be included if her schedule permits.

Today was Brent's last day in the Houston office for several months.  Let me
know how I can help with these arrangements.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans @ ENRON                           04/04/2000 09:28 AM

To: sue.white@mail.utexas.edu
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Lee, Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charla Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Sue:  Greetings!  We have not spoken in awhile, but I wanted to touch base
with you regarding the MBA Excellence Awards and specifically hosting a
dinner similar to last year's event at Jeffrey's.  I am expecting a baby in
two weeks, so I'd like to get as much of this planned now as possible!  Amy
Lee, Charla Stuart and Ali Saler who work in my group will pick up any of the
pieces that I don't get to prior to becoming a mom, and one of them will
attend the dinner in Austin.

I have a number of questions:  First, have the award winners been chosen?
notified? What are their names/phone numbers? Can you help us with the guest
list from the university?  How does the week of April 24 look on the
university's calendar?  If we can't find a date before the school year ends,
we could have the dinner during the beginning of the fall semester, but I'd
like to try for the end of April/beginning of May.

I would like to use the Josephine House at Jeffrey's Restaurant again - it
worked well last year, but I haven't called them yet - waiting to hear
answers to the questions above...

Have a great day!  I can be reached by email or phone at 713-853-0565.

Thanks!
Elyse Kalmans


i am a shooter again.  i got a cell phone.  the number is 713-825-8410.  i am
being annitiantion.


FYI -

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jafry, Rahil
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob
Cc: Abbanat, Stephen
Subject: FW: CMS Opportunity

FYI - Lets talk about this today.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  gregory.felton@cgiusa.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-gregory+2Efelton+40cgiusa+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Jafry, Rahil
Subject: CMS Opportunity

Jafry,

Here is the actual presentation requirements as per the RFP.  We can deviate
from the form, but must address their stated requirements.  I think we
should structure the Enron portion as follows:

I.    ENW Overview
II.   Products and Services
III.  Engagement Approach

Let me know what you think.  We need to pull this together today.

I've also attached the material Steve sent me previously.

Thanks,

Greg

Office: (713) 868-5537 x1148
Mobile: (281) 787-9760
eMail: gregory.felton@cgiusa.com

 - CMS Panhandle Pipe Line - RFP1.doc


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 06112

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please accept this invitation, as it will automatically populate onto your calendars.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
x36143


I have been trying to hook up with Kevin and will see him tomorrow.  I still
prefer to use the "old exec committee plus" for this PRC with a reformed MD
PRC starting at mid year.  We have too many people in transition to just
switch over to the policy committee at this stage.

	Cindy Olson
	12/04/2000 09:10 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Steve, my preference is the first option however I can live with either
really.......we just need to make a decision ......what do you think??????
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

David Oxley@ECT
12/04/2000 08:29 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re:

How can we resolve today if possible?
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 08:28
AM ---------------------------

Kevin Hannon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 12/02/2000 10:12:58 AM
To: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re:

You know my opinion, I vote for option #2.

Kevin

	Gina Corteselli@ENRON
	11/30/00 07:19 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:

Following discussions with Steve and Kevin yesterday, we're providing some
options for the conduct of final PRC reviews  for the Enron VP's and MD's.
Please let us know which of these options (or a derivative therein) you'd
prefer.

For continuity through the year-end process, we might consider having the
existing MD VP PRC Committee review the VP slate; and  the former EC and two
newly appointed EC members  who are also VP PRC Committee, (John  Lavorato
and Jeff Shankman were suggested), ratify the VP slate and review the
MD's.    The newly appointed EC members who are MD level will remain in the
"Not Rated" category, so that Jeff and John may participate in the overall
discussion and depart before discussions relative to them and their EC
colleagues.

Alternatively, we might disband the existing MD VP PRC Committee in favor of
having the newly appointed EC  (13  of whom are MD VP PRC) review the VP
slate.  Thereafter, the Enron Corporate Policy Committee would be responsible
for ratifying these results and for reviewing the MD's slate.  Insofar as the
Policy Committee might require further  information on individual MD's,
selected EC members could be invited for an appropriate period of time to
provide the necessary details.

If we opt to disband the existing MD VP PRC we'd need to notify those members
who aren't part of the new EC that their services are no longer required.  In
so much as some of these people are currently assigned to, and attending, BU
and functional pre-rankings clearly the sooner we are able to do this, the
better.

Your immediate attention to this issue would be greatly appreciated, since we
are eager to begin the year-end VP/MD PRC planning process.  Thanks in
advance,

Gina Corteselli


Oh I'm glad you sent me an e-mail because there is no rehearsal
tonight!!!!!
Tasha said she saw Taylor in the children's church, and I looked for you in
the audience, but did not see you.  After church let out, I was gone, I was
home by 1:15 p.m.  That never happens!  I looked for you guys and I said, oh
well, I'll catch them later.

By the way, I'm having Jordan's B-Day party on Monday evening, January 22,
2000 at the Chuckie Cheese on the Southwest Freeway,  Yes I'm having it on a
Monday night after work (6:30 p.m.) because I can't stand that place, and
Jordan has his heart set on it.  It's always too crowded and it drives me
crazy!  So I figure, we'll meet between 6:30 and 7:00 p.m. and be out of
there by 8:30 p.m.  It's not the best plan, but it beats a Friday, Saturday
or a Sunday.  I'm just inviting about 6 people. so it'll definitely be small
Let me know if you're interested.

See you soon!.


Jeff Hodge asked me to send the attached memo regarding American Express
Company to you.

Kaye


Here is a draft of Ban Sharma's and Ursula's presentation on what California
has done wrong.  I think a few people are looking for this info.  Please work
with Ban to add / change, etc. so we have one document.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/26/2001
06:14 PM ---------------------------

Ursula Brenner
06/26/2001 05:29 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: New version

Jim,

We made some grammar  and cosmetic changes... here is the latest version.
Also, we modified the meaning of bullet three (page 3) and added appendix 1.

Do you want to change the title?

We will wait for your comments.

Ursula


> Attached please find copies of the following schedules and annexes to the
> Purchase and Sale Agreement:
>
> 1) the  Master Parent Disclosure Letter;
>
> 2) the schedules for India;
>
> 3) the schedules for EGEP;
>
> 4) the schedules for APACHI; and
>
> 5) Annex G, listing the contracts that have been excluded for
> confidentiality reasons.
>
> Please note that the schedules for the SoCal assets will follow shortly
> under a separate cover.  In addition, we plan to circulate copies of the
> CALME and Wind schedules tomorrow.
>
> If you have any questions or any problems opening any of the attachments,
> please do not hesitate to contact either Gray Sasser at (713)758-3425 or
> Donnie Roark at (713)758-3374.
>
>
>
>
>
>  <<Master-Disclosure-Ltr.DOC>>  <<India-Schedules.DOC>>
> <<EGEP-Schedules.DOC>>   <<APACHI-Schedules.wpd>>  <<Annex G --
> Excluded-Contracts-Confidentiality.DOC>>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
> email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
> return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
>
>

 - WORD v1 Summer Disclosure Letter.DOC
 - 00 India Schedules.DOC
 - 285641_1.DOC
 - Lightning-Schedules3.wpd
 - Annex G -- Excluded Information Based on Confidentiality Requirements.DOC


Looks like we might have to modify this name in EnPower after all - The dba
on our master agreement is "Sierra Pacific Industries" with no "Inc." at the
end. I just spoke with Bob Ellery over at Sierra, and he confirmed that,
although the company is a corporation, they never use "Inc." in their
contracts. Thus, our confirm letters would not match up with the master
agreement because of those three pesky letters.

Just let me know if this causes a problem for either of you. In case you'd
like to reference it, the deal number we're attempting to modify is 573679 -
it's a buy from Sierra done by Chris Foster on the 10th of April.

Thanks again for all your help.
Kate
503-464-7486


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																								[IMAGE]

																		Enerfax Daily

																[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]
																						[IMAGE]
																																[IMAGE]

																																[IMAGE]

																																					[IMAGE]

																												Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																											Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 16,  2000

																																				[IMAGE]

																																	[IMAGE]

																																			Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 16, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																																					[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]

																																									[IMAGE]
																																			[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]

																													Alberta's Oil and Natural? Gas Revenue Doubles

																													?  ? Alberta's revenue from oil and natural gas will more than  double this
year to about C$8.7 billion. It will use most of the  money to cut its debt.
Alberta, the biggest international supplier  of natural gas to the US, will
pay down its debt by C$4.5 billion  this year and give residents C$485
million in tax and energy-bill  rebates. Alberta is expecting a C$4.2 billion
budget surplus in the  fiscal year ending March 31. Alberta collects a
percentage of  revenue from oil and natural gas produced in the province.
The  province's debt, now around C$12.5 billion, rose when prices were  low.
Alberta's low debt and its repayment program have earned it the  highest
credit rating of any Canadian province.

																																		[IMAGE]

																							Natural? Gas? Storage?  Report

																									[IMAGE]
																									[IMAGE]

																									? ? ? ? ? ? Week?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Prev?
																									? ? ? ? ?  ?Ending? ? Prev? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?Prev? ?  Year? ?
																									| Region | 11/10/00| Week | Diff | % Full | Year |  % Full
																									|  Prod? ?|? ?688? ?|? 687  |? ?1? |? 72%? ?|? 847  |? 89%? ?
																									| East? ?|?  1682? ?| 1678 |? ?4? |?  92%? ?| 1730 |? 95%? ?
																									|  West?  ?|? ?372? ?|? 383 | -11?  |? 74%? ?|? 439 |? 87%?  ?
																									|?  ? ? ? |? ? ? ?  ?|? ? ? |? ? ? |?  ? ? ? |? ? ? |? ?  ? ?
																									| Total? |? 2742? ?| 2748 |?  -6? |? 83%? ?| 3016 |? 91%?  ?

																									[IMAGE]

																									[IMAGE]

																																							[IMAGE]

																																								Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 16, 2000

																																						[IMAGE]

																																							Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 16, 2000

																																					[IMAGE]

																														Canadian 88 Losses Increase

																														?

																														?  ? Canadian 88 Energy, which has put itself up for sale, says  its third
quarter loss widened seven-fold because of production  problems and an
ill-fated natural gas hedging program. It reported  the loss grew to C$5.2
million. Cash flow, a key indicator a firm's  ability to fund future
exploration, fell 64% to C$2.3 million from  C$6.4 million. The third quarter
results reflected the one-time  impact of the upgrading program at the Olds
Gas Plant, which  shut-in? 26 MMcf per day of natural gas and 770 barrels of
liquids daily from September 5th until October 7th. Most Canadian  firms have
been big winners in the natural gas market, but not  Canadian 88, whose
natural gas hedging reduced cash flow by $26  million in the quarter.

																																					[IMAGE]

																																	Financial Summary

																																								[IMAGE]

																										")} TC
																				[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img34.gif
 - img11.gif
 - img35.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img36.gif


count me in.
PL


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Kerry Harrington
Expense Report Name: emclaughlin42401
Report Total: $78.00
Amount Due Employee: $78.00
Amount Approved: $78.00
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pre-Approved
Payment Status: Authorized

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Are multiparty ISDAs a real option ? This seems like the simplest solution.

If not, I think we are back to the alternatives mentioned below.

With respect to the spread products I believe there are no spread books as such, each risk is laid off to the respective books. In this case, a good rule of thumb would be to have the spread product offered by ENA (thus it is ENA who contracts with the hedge fund) and then ENA lays off the relevant risk (in the WTI/Brent example ENA lays off Brent to ECTRIC). The only issue I see with this is offering the product when ENA is closed, as traders in London cannot act on behalf of ENA (or alternatively traders in Houston could work extended hours ?).

Russell, do the hedge funds operate only out of New York, or would they operate out of London or other European offices also ? I am just wondering how much of an issue the trading hours would be.

To clarify, using ENA as the contracting party for all global liquids products would risk exposing ENA to a UK tax presence (assuming that traders continue to be based in London). Since a significant proportion of Enron's total income is earned by ENA this would be an unacceptable risk (any UK tax paid cannot offset the US tax liability because of certain limitations that apply to Enron - thus most of the UK tax paid represents an additional cost).

Regards
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	28 September 2001 13:22
To:	Boyd, Justin; Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Justin,

Your solution appears to respond specifically to EOL related legal/credit issues.  However, isn't this only the tip of the iceberg?  What about non-EOL OTC trades conducted by ECTRIC traders with counterparties that want ENA as their counterparty.  From my time in London, it was always impressed upon me that there was a quagmire of additional tax and potential regulatory (SFA) issues.

Please comment.

Also, as a commercially efficient course of action, It has always seemed to me that we should attempt to "train" our couterparties to accept that ECTRIC is also a Enron Corp guaranteed sub (at least it was in the past, at their request) and somehow initially set up our contracts/ISDA to be inclusive of this vehicle.  Is this possible?  Otherwise, the permutations of various legal/credit/tax/regulatory hurdles for all manner of OTC trades becomes onerous.

Bill--

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	28 September 2001 05:43
To:	Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Russell

My view would be to follow the novation route, i.e.

1.	C/P trades via EOL with ECTRIC
2.	Each trade is novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and treated as concluded under ENA ISDA Master
3.	ENA enters into back-to-back trade with ECTRIC

This does mean that the C/P must initially accept the European EOL GTCs, though if we set up a mechanism whereby EOL trades are automatically novated to ENA and treated as concluded under the ENA ISDA Master, this effectively cancels out the EOL GTCs.

Justin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyk, Russell
Sent:	27 September 2001 23:38
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Boyd, Justin; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

Everyone -

Our hedge fund group needs clarification on the issue of doing Brent and other European product deals w/ our hedge fund counterparties and booking them back to ENA, the entity with which all the funds have ISDAs. We just did two WTI/Brent crude oil spreads today, one w/ very large volume, and expect to be doing more such deals.

This is more than just a legal issue; it's going to impact credit and our strategy to get the funds trading on EOL as well.

As we understand it, the main legal issue is that all the funds have an ISDA only w/ ENA and not w/ ECTRIC, so they (and I assume we) want all deals and legal exposure to be w/ ENA. To satisfy both parties' desires, all European product deals must be booked from ECTRIC to ENA. Sara, from speaking to you and from Justin's response below, it seems to me that the only legal hurdle we, the funds, and our traders might face is if no trader w/ ENA in Houston okays w/ the counterparty on ENA's behalf. However, there seem to be 2 other solutions (a netting agreement and novating) that get around this. As Sara knows, dealing on legal agreements w/ the funds can be onerous and time-consuming; negotiating more paperwork is not a viable option.

From the credit side, as we understand it, the issue w/ not back-to-backing the trades w/ ENA is that the credit exposure will not be aggregated to the funds' net position in Houston and, therefore, not monitored. In other words, any exposure not sitting w/ ENA will be invisible to credit. so daily margining, etc. will  be incorrect.

From the EnronOnline side, as we see it there are a couple of issues. EOL wants the funds to trade online; an increasing number of funds also want to trade online. However, they do not want to be restricted to trading products that are only US based. Also, they would like to see more arb spread products like a WTI/Brent crude oil spread online. If neither desire can be easily met b/c we need a separate ISDA w/ ECTRIC (which potentially means, as above, more onerous and time-consuming negotiation), then it will certainly be detrimental for volume and also foresake a certain momentum that we are gaining now.

The point has been raised that the funds could trade European products if credit in London cleared them and if they were willing then to accept the general terms and conditions that pop up on EOL. We can assure you that they will not accept this.

These are the issues as we see them from the origination side. There may be other issues that we're missing from the sides that I've mentioned as well as the trading/back office side.
Regards,
Russ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Dyk, Russell
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharma, Shifali
Sent:	26 July 2001 08:21
To:	White, Bill
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

This is what we have heard from Legal and Tax so far.  We're trying to get a list of couterparties that currently will not trade with ECTRIC and only with ENA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:10 AM
To:	Juggins, Janine; Beyhum, Maya
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie; Marsh, Jonathan
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

i agree - assuming you follow janine's approach, then no adverse UK regulatory issues will ensue

justin
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Juggins, Janine
Sent:	25 July 2001 19:29
To:	Beyhum, Maya; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

I assume that these are financial transactions. The current approach is the right one in the circumstances - i.e trade between ECTRIC and ENA, trade between ENA and third party (eg Bank of America). It is important that the trader agreeing to the deal with the third party in the name of ENA is located in Houston (they cannot agree deals in the name of ENA when located in London).  The pricing should be such that ENA is compensated for taking the credit risk with respect to the third party but otherwise all the economics should be with ECTRIC.

To avoid booking the back to back trades, a possibility would be an agreement on netting to be entered into by ECTRIC, ENA and Bank of America if all parties can get comfortable with the legal position.

Another alternative sometimes put forward is that ECTRIC does the deal with Bank of America, the contract is then novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and ENA enters into a back to back swap on the same financial terms with ECTRIC.

Note that we are currently working on a project to enter into financials through EFET LLC (arranged by EEFT) instead of ECTRIC (effective 1 November).

Regards
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beyhum, Maya
Sent:	25 July 2001 14:13
To:	Juggins, Janine; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	Trades as ENA

Hi

I am currently working in the London Risk group for Global Markets.

At the moment we have a number of counterparties who do not want to transact with ECTRIC but would like to do deals only with ENA (e.g. Bank of America). As a result, if a London trader wants to carry out a trade with Bank of America, he will do an internal trade with a trader in Houston and then book a trade between the Houston trader (who trades under ENA) and Bank Of America. The trades are then confirmed from the Houston office.

We were wondering about a couple of things:

Are there any tax/legal implications we should be aware of as a result of booking the trades as we do
Is there a way to approach these counterparties to get them to trade with ECTRIC (as this currently creates a lot of paperwork and administration)?

Thanks for your help
Maya


Steve,
I spoke with Eric this morning.  He'll continue to work on documenting the estimate, and to prepare maps and a schematic of the proposed facilities.  This will be necessary down the road not only for your files but for purposes of selling El Paso on the joint operation protocol/procedures.  We'll also need the project engineers to verify the assumptions/design criteria for the facilities to assure adequacy of service to both phases of the project.

Eric and his crew are working on a couple of other pretty important projects this week and most likely won't have a chance to complete the aforementioned documentation and mapping until late next week.  Either Eric or I will give you an update next week.   Likewise, we'd appreciate it if you could keep us advised of the progress you guys make on the development of this project.

We definitely appreciate working with you on this deal.

"Steve Rutherford" <steve@apiweb.com> on 02/03/2001 04:37:37 PM
Please respond to <steve@apiweb.com>
To:	<Eric.Faucheaux@enron.com>
cc:	<Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com>, <Terry.Galassini@enron.com>

Subject:	RE: Cost Estimates - Belen, NM Power Plant

Eric,
Thanks for this information. This is what we need at this stage of
developing the project.
Steve Rutherford
American Process Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Eric.Faucheaux@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Faucheaux@enron.com]
Sent:	Friday, February 02, 2001 6:43 PM
To:	steve@apiweb.com
Cc:	Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com; Terry.Galassini@enron.com
Subject:	Cost Estimates - Belen, NM Power Plant

Since time is of the essence for you, Jeffery has requested that I prepare
and send an Order of Magnitude Estimate for connection pipelines and
measuring facilities for the proposed project.  The estimates include
overhead and contingencies but do not include gross up for income taxes.

Pipelines - $500,000
   30"x8" hot tap and 4400 LF of 8" pipeline from TW P/L to measuring
   facilities/EPNG tie-in
   1000 LF of 10" pipeline from measuring facilities/EPNG tie-in to
   proposed plant site boundry

Measuring Facilities - $550,000
   Ultrasonic Measuring facilities and regulating facilities for TW and
   EPNG pipelines

EPNG Hot-tap and Monitoring Facilities - $200,000
   30"x8" hot tap and flow regulation and monitoring equipment

Total Project:  1,250,000

Futher details may be provided within the weeks to follow that shall
include flow schematics, layout plans, sizing details, etc. where time will
be permitted.  I may be reached by cellular,713/854-6716, or pager,
887/727-0018, if any questions you may have need to be answered before
Monday; otherwise, I can be reached at the office at 713/853-3395.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	auto-confirm@amazon.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of auto-confirm@amazon.com
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	dgiron@enron.com
Subject:	Your Order with Amazon.com (#103-4154813-2144622)

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	     Thanks for your order, Darron Giron!  If you ordered several items to be delivered to the same address, we might send them separately to ensure quicker service. But don't worry: you won't be charged any extra shipping fees.  Thanks again for shopping with us.  Amazon.com Customer Service    Manage Your Account:      Did you know you can view and edit your orders online? Click Your Account  to:   Access "Where's My Stuff?"  Combine orders  Change payment options  Change shipping address  Cancel unshipped items Change gift messaging   Do much more...          Purchasing Information:    Your purchase reads as follows:  E-mail Address:  dgiron@enron.com     Items:     $    51.96  Shipping & Handling:              $     5.48     ------ Total Before Tax:   $    57.44  Estimated Tax*:   $     0.00     ------ Purchase Total:    $    57.44  * See tax and seller information for Order #103-4154813-2144622 .         Order Summary:  Order #1:(Order #103-4154813-2144622 )   Darron Giron 14343 Millstone Estates Ln.  Cypress, TX 77429  United States  Shipping Method: Standard Shipping Shipping Preference: Ship when all items are available.      [IMAGE] 1  "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (Book 2)" J. K. Rowling; Hardcover; @ $11.97 each  Usually available in 24 hours  [IMAGE] 1  "Star Wars Episode 1:  Jedi Power Battles" Video Game; @ $39.99 each  Usually available in 24 hours     You can make changes to any unshipped orders in Your Account . If you've explored the links on that page but still have a question, please visit our online Help Department .  Please note: This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail.  Please do not reply to this message.   Thanks again for shopping with us.   Amazon.com  Earth's Biggest Selection   [IMAGE] Prefer not to receive HTML mail? Click here


When: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB2831

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Your approval is needed for the following 2 product types in Datamanager:

US Residual Fuel Oil 1% Crack Spread
US Residual Fuel Oil 3% Crack Spread

Please do not approve between the hours of 6 am and 11 am..

US ResidOil Spd  NYH 1% Crack Spread     Jun01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty on the Website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Jun 2001
to the Termination Date of 30 Jun 2001.
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the difference obtained by
subtracting (i) the arithmetic average of the daily settlement prices for the
prompt month NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures Contract for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period from (ii) the arithmetic average of the
mean of the daily quotations for No. 6, 1%S Max appearing under the heading
"New York/Boston Cargo" in the section entitled "Product Price Assessments"
for those issues of Platt's Oilgram Price Report published for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period. "Pricing Date" means, a day on which
Platt's Oilgram Price Report is published and which is also a NYMEX trading
day.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.

US ResidOil Spd  GC 3% Crack Spread      Jun01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty on the Website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The Effective Date is 01 Jun 2001. The Termination Date  is 30 Jun 2001.
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the difference obtained by
subtracting (i) the arithmetic average of the daily settlement prices for the
prompt month NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures Contract for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period from (ii) the arithmetic average of the
mean of the daily quotations for No. 6, 3%S appearing under the heading "U.S.
Gulf Coast Waterborne" in the section entitled "Product Price Assessments"
for those issues of Platt's Oilgram Price Report published for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period.  "Pricing Date" means, a day on which
Platt's Oilgram Price Report is published and which is also a NYMEX trading
day.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


---------------------- Forwarded by Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Tom May
03/01/2001 11:14 AM
To: Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Information sources for TTC, transmission outages, etc.

FYI.  Please forward to the rest  of your group.

Tom.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 03/01/2001 11:12 AM
---------------------------

John Llodra
03/01/2001 10:22 AM
To: NEPOOL Power Trading Group
cc:

Subject: Information sources for TTC, transmission outages, etc.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Llodra/Corp/Enron on 03/01/2001
11:25 AM ---------------------------

"Coughlin, Robert \"Bob\"" <rcoughlin@iso-ne.com> on 03/01/2001 10:09:45 AM
To: "Allard, Todd" <todd.allard@omya.com>, Anabeth Rivest
<rivest@gmpvt.com>, "Ash, John" <ashjc@nu.com>, "Azulay, Gail"
<Gail_Azulay@nstaronline.com>, "Bacon, Roger" <rwb@mmwec.org>, Barbara Zucco
<bzucco@iso-ne.com>, "Bertagnolli, Dave" <dbert@iso-ne.com>, "Bloom, Edla"
<EBloom@holdenlight.com>, "Bob Trejo (E-mail)"  <rjtrejo@pplweb.com>, "Brian
Beauregard (E-mail)" <bbeauregard@hged.com>, Carissa Sedlacek
<csedlacek@iso-ne.com>, "Clopeck, Jeffrey"  <jaclopeck@dbh.com>, "Collins,
James" <mayhews@plmnet.com>, "Constellation Pwr. Src." <nepool@powersrc.com>,
"Coughlin, Robert \"Bob\"" <rcoughlin@iso-ne.com>, Dave Foote
<foote@unitil.com>, "Doerpholz, Wayne" <sheld@the-spa.com>, "Edward A.
Chaisson" <edward.chaisson@cmpco.com>, "Evans-Mongeon, Brian"
<emongeon@vppsa.com>, "Fischer, Christine" <cfischer@cmeec.org>, "Fleming,
Ken" <kfleming@usgen.com>, "Gaffney, Francis"
<fgaffney@mail.danvers-ma.org>, "Graczykowski, Peter"
<peterg@americamail.com>, "Harris, Peter" <pharris@iso-ne.com>, "Ide, Chuck"
<cide@iso-ne.com>, "Irving, James" <jamesirving@tmlp.com>, Jeffrey Cady
<jcady@celd.com>, Jennifer Hein <jennifer.hein@gen.pge.com>, Jim Brown
<brownj@gmpvt.com>, "Joe Rossignoli (E-mail)"
<joseph.rossignoli@us.ngrid.com>, "John Fitch (E-mail)"  <jfitch@pmld.com>,
John Guman <john.guman@uinet.com>, John Llodra  <jllodra@enron.com>, "Jolly,
Robert" <rjolly@marbleheadelectric.com>, "Jorgensen, Gunnar"
<jorgege@nu.com>, Ken Stone <kstone@beld.com>, "Kilgo, John"
<kilgoj@aol.com>, "Kulik, Mike" <mkulik@iso-ne.com>, Laurie Heffron
<lheffron@beld.com>, "Lawrence, Wilma"  <wlawrence@iso-ne.com>, "Madeira,
Elida" <emadeira@cmeec.org>, "Mary Ellen Paravalos (E-mail)"
<mary.ellen.paravalos@us.ngrid.com>, "McCluskey, Joseph" <tbrady@bhe.com>,
"McKinnon, Bruce"  <bmckinnon@mmwec.org>, Michael Erskine
<michael.erskine@cmpco.com>, Mike Zeoli <mzeoli@iso-ne.com>, "Monteiro,
Anthony" <ajm@ultranet.com>, "Nolan, Ken" <knolan@burlingtonelectric.com>,
"Paika, Francis"  <fpaika@ci.shrewsbury.ma.us>, "Parenteau, Jane"
<jparenteau@rmld.com>, "Paula Taupier (E-mail)" <taupipm@nu.com>, "Reeves,
Thayne"  <treeves@bhe.com>, "Richards, Patricia"
<prichards@burlingtonelectric.com>, Robert Amelang <bamelan@cvps.com>, "Rose
Ann Pelletier (E-mail)" <Rose_Ann_Pelletier@nstaronline.com>, Rose Pysh
<rose.pysh@uinet.com>, "Runge, Eric" <erunge@dbh.com>, "Ryan, William"
<mryan@cvps.com>, "Scarborough, Denise"  <dscarborough@velco.com>, "Scherer,
Tom" <tscherer@iso-ne.com>, "Sciripoli, Joseph" <jscirpoli@wbmlp.com>, Scott
Mallory  <smallory@velco.com>, "Seldon, William" <wseldon@rmld.com>,
"Simonelli, John" <jsimonelli@iso-ne.com>, "Smith, Douglas"
<dsmith@lacapra.com>, "Spadea, Joseph" <jspadea@hmlp.com>, "Sweetland, David"
<dsweet@naelectric.com>, "Tabroff, Ronald"  <pmlp@star.net>, Thomas Fantasia
<thomas_fantasia@nstaronline.com>, "Tom Alderfer (E-mail)"
<tmalderfer@pplweb.com>, "Tomasko, Jerry"  <gtomasko@wgeld.org>, "Wallace,
William" <wallace@prime-x.net>, "White, Rick" <whitefb@nu.com>, "Whittemore,
Scott"  <scottwhittemore@tmlp.com>, "Wong, Peter" <pwong@iso-ne.com>
cc: "Molodetz, Steve - HQ Energy Serv.US" <molodetz@sgi.net>

Subject: Information sources for TTC, transmission outages, etc.

Hello,
I have received inquiries recently regarding Phase I/II TTC and transmission
outage information.  I have compiled a list of sources of such information
(attached).  If you have any questions please contact me.
 <<TTC_Info_Sources.doc>>
Bob

Robert M. Coughlin
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA 01040
rcoughlin@iso-ne.com <mailto:rcoughlin@iso-ne.com>
telephone: (413) 535-4114
fax: (413) 535-4343

 - TTC_Info_Sources.doc


What the NYMEX is trying to get at is their concern that the NYMEX considers
the trades of ENA and its two other principal trading affiliates (Enron
Canada and London) to be one and the same as ENA.  It is also concerned that
we might and try and set up other companies and trade of of those to try and
increase our overall trading volume with the NYMEX.  Further, the NYMEX also
doesn't want us to increase our company's overall trading volume, by "hiding"
trades through accounts in the name of individual employees,   The Annual
Hedge Exemptions applications require that ENA represent whether its
officers, employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or
have a financial interest in any other related commodity future(s) account
either individually or acting with another person pursuant to express or
implied agreement.as indicated in the original email from Mark.   The
transaction you mentioned below doesn't appear to be problematic, since it
flows through ENA's risk books,  thus not increasing the overall position the
NYMEX allows us to trade.

This annual email has a secondary unplanned, but helpful control purpose, it
fleshes out the trading of employees that might be in violation of the
Company's Trading Policy.

	Michael Etringer
	06/23/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Tina,

I need some clarification in regards to this email.   ENA holds interest in
the LV Cogeneration Limited Partnership, both directly and through its
friendly investor structure,   which is a QF facility located in Las Vegas.
As part of the financing of the facility, ENA entered into a 10 year
financial NYMEX swap with LV Cogen.  Brad Richter, ENA VP, signed the NYMEX
confirmations on behalf of LV Cogen (Desert Arc LLC) and ENA.

Is this transaction of interest to you and do you need additional information
with regards to this transaction?

Regards,
Mike Etringer
503-464-3836

Jim Gilbert
06/23/2000 07:18 AM
To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT
Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Mike,

Is this something we need to respond to?  Please advise.

Thanks,
Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT on 06/23/2000 07:15
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           06/21/2000 04:39 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
cc:
Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


The report named: West VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=26&report_name=West+VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/22/2001>, published as of 10/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 4)


Rob, if you and Dave think this is your best branding opportunity in the
short run as we gear up I am supportive.  I assume this will be covered in
Canada's budget.  Send me a towel.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2001
06:14 PM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
01/17/2001 06:09 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Retail Branding

Dave, Pope has been working with the Stampeder organization for the last six
months on creating a sponsorship package for our Retail business. Our first
goal was to attempt to get the naming rights to McMahon Stadium (not unlike
the Canadian Airlines Saddledome, Enron Field, etc.). At this point the
naming rights are off the table. However, we have the opportunity to grab the
naming rights to the Labour Day Classic as well as some other season-long
involvement. Terms of the deal at this point are as follows:

1. "Enron Labor day Classsic" and 100 thirty-second radio spots promoting the
Enron Labor day Classic + Newspaper Ads
 40,000 Enron logo cheering towels to be distributed pre-game
 Exclusive sponsorship on the cover of the game day program
 Enron logo on the player's jerseys

2. Season long involvement
 End-Zone advertising
 1 full-page color ad in the Stamp's 2001 yearbook
 12 season tickets
 12 red & white club memberships

Cost would be approx $100K Cdn (still be negotiated).

In terms of our overall strategy for branding, this is likely the only
initiative that we would pursue in 2001 as we like that it has good
penetration for the entire province of Alberta as well as national exposure.
The Labour day game draws the biggest crowd each season, has been sold out
eight out the past nine seasons, and is the largest single day sporting event
in Calgary each year. Last year the "battle of Alberta" attracted over
750,000 viewers on CBC. The timing is also very good as we will be fully
functional by September.

Let me know what you think.

Regards
Milnthorp


Hi Brian,

What a great surprise!

Life is pretty good.  To see a summary, you might want to check out Paige's
website: http://www.southwestern.edu/~recordp/  (I tried to copy that as a
link, but I think I messed up.)

I guess Peggy told you (or you figured out from my email address) that I'm
working at Enron. I like it.  I enjoy being back downtown after being a
suburban lawyer.  Home life is relatively calm, which has always been a goal
of mine.  I'm dealing with my folks getting older, with the health problems
which come with that process.  Overall, I'm very blessed and happy.

How about you?  If you are spending time at HM, you must still be doing the
law thing. I might have lost a bet on that one.  So how's your life?

Paige completed her minor in German.  Consider it a Wunder legacy!  Her
brother, Michael is a real charmer.  You would get a huge kick out of him.

Thanks so much for writing.  I can't wait to hear what is going on with you.

Kay

"Wunder, Brian Kent" <wunder@copn.com> on 08/22/2000 12:07:20 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: catching up

Kay,

I've been spending some time at Hays McConn in the past few weeks --
depositions.  I saw Peggy and we spoke about you.  I just wanted to know how
you and Paige were doing.

Brian

This e-mail and any attached files may be confidential and subject to
attorney/client privilege.  If you received it in error, please immediately
notify the sender by return e-mail or by calling (713)654-7600.


no thanks


Use this file, NOT the previous one sent.  Thanks.

Mat


TO:            Houston Angel Network

FROM:      Kerry Brooks and Michelle Weisblatt

Dear Angel Investor,

Please mark your calendar for the September, Houston Angel Network Breakfast meeting on September 19.  Details of the meeting are as follows:

DATE:               Wednesday, September 19, 2001
TIME:                7:00-9:00 AM (Registration, 7:00-7:30)
LOCATION:       The Houstonian, 111 N. Post Oak Blvd.
COST:              $45

Four companies will be presenting.  Two of the four companies have been confirmed and there are several others that are being evaluated by the HAN steering committee.  I have attached executive summaries for the two companies that are confirmed.  Also, we have scheduled follow up meetings for interested investors according to the following schedule:

Meetrix:  10:00 AM, September 26, 5450 NW Central, Ste. 230, Houston, TX 77092

Fiber Dynamics:  9:00 AM, September 25, 1100 Louisiana, Ste. 5005, Houston, TX 77002

If you are interested in attending any of the follow up meetings, please mark your calendars.

Lastly, I am attaching an Angel breakfast sign-up form.  Please note that if you intend to bring guests to the breakfast, or if you have never completed an Angel application with the HTC, you should complete the attached form IN ADVANCE.  Although we will not require that the membership fee be paid, we will ask that all attendees who have not completed a form submit one prior to or on the day of the breakfast.  It will significantly expedite the check-in process if these forms are completed in advance.  Also, please remember to register your guests in advance with Kathy Nethercutt at knethercutt@houstontech.org  or call 713.658.1750, so that we have proper accommodations for everyone in terms of seating, food, etc.

Best regards,

Kerry Brooks and Michelle Weisblatt

Thank you for your interest in the Houston Technology Center

Kathy B. Nethercutt
Houston Technology Center
1200 Smith, Suite 2940
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: 713.658.1750
Fx: 713.658.1744
www.houstontech.org
knethercutt@houstontech.org

 - MeetrixOnePage9-6.doc
 - FDISummarySep06.doc
 - new HAN Application 8-15-01.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 01:27
PM ---------------------------

"Shannon K. Spencer" <skspencer@cmsenergy.com> on 01/11/2001 11:41:44 AM
To: Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Happy Hour

Gosh, I'm not sure I can live up to that advanced billing....I'll try to be
fun, but you must remember the "hot" part is coming from a married guy!
Actually, I was planning on going out with 2 or 3 other girls tomorrow
night, but I'm sure we can move it up a few hours (no, I'm not always such
a pushover!)

Sounds like fun, let me know the details.....look forward to meeting y'all!


Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

 - spa.pdf
 - pda.pdf


No le hace.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elbertson, Janette
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gray, Barbara N.; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Keohane, Peter; Lundstrom, Bruce; McCullough, Travis; Murray, Julia; Sager, Elizabeth; Sanders, Richard B.; Schuler, Lance; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Tweed, Sheila
Cc:	Adams, Suzanne; Crawford, Sharon; Farrell, Keegan; Foy, Tracy; Garcia, Nita; George, Carolyn; Haldeman, Sandy; Hoelscher, Wendi; Keiser, Holly; Rozycki, Joanne; Sweet, Twanda; Wright, Alice; Zucha, Theresa
Subject:	Monday Morning Meetings

I am taking a poll for Mark Haedicke.  He may need to change the time for the Monday morning meetings.  Would you prefer the meeting start time change to 10:30 a.m. or 11:00 a.m.?

Please let me know as soon as possible.  Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail address:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


yeah, they sent me some candy ass  "sorry" letter. no $ though

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 02/14/2001 12:37:32 PM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: computer options

Eric,

Did you ever hear back from America West?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: computer options

i havent heard anything yet - i will let you know though

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 01/18/2001 12:12:34 PM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: computer options

Eric,

Will you have any opportunities for Rodeo tickets through Enron?

Jason Bass
Compaq Portables
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:     Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:17 AM
To:  Bass, Jason
Subject:  computer options

Option 1 - laptop low end
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=PR700SON19&custo

mer_id=19&keycode=6V900

Option 2 - laptop high end
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=EG700UON19&custo

mer_id=19&keycode=6V901

Option 3 - desktop (free)
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=LP866PO19&custom

er_id=19&keycode=6V903

what do you think?


names for software addition of Hear Me

Fletch Sturm
Andy Lewis
Robin Menear
Patrice Thurston
Kevin Ruscitti
Geoff Storey
Sylvia Pollan
Martin Cuilla
Kelli Stevens
Tom Donohoe
Joe Parks


Attatched are USGT's (Aquila)responses to the FERC's questions.  It was mailed on Friday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bishop, Cindy [mailto:CBishop@UtiliCorp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Mackenzie, Nanci; Johnston, Elsa; Harris, Steven; McConnell, Mark
Subject: RE: Final draft FERC response

The ultimate final copy.

 <<FERC response.doc>>

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Bishop, Cindy
> Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 3:49 PM
> To:	Mackenzie, Nanci; Johnston, Elsa; 'steven.harris@enron.com';
> 'mark_mcconnell@enron.net'
> Subject:	Final draft FERC response
>
>  << File: FERC response.doc >>
>
> Cindy Bishop
> Sr. Trader-West
> Aquila Dallas Marketing
> 2711 N. Haskell Ave. #2050
> Dallas, TX  75204
> 214/827-9464
>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Luncheon w/Sally Beck (more info will follow) per Patti Thompson  MEET IN THE LOBBY

Date:		12/15/2000
Time:		11:15 AM - 1:45 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


What do you think of this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	King Jr., Frazier
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Hartsoe, Joe
Subject:	RAC Procedures

Rod and Joe,

Here is a proposed write up of the procedures we use to protect the data that we send to RAC.
Please take a look and give me your comments.
Thanks!

Frazier