Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 23, 2001 2 P.M. Edition

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit
MICHIGAN -- PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures
MICHIGAN -- PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates
HAWAII -- Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud
MICHIGAN -- PSC fines companies for 'slamming'
UTAH -- Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools
FLORIDA -- Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed
MISSOURI -- Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'
VIRGINIA -- Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech
heritage
IDAHO -- PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund
TEXAS -- ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

WIRELESS
PENNSYLVANIA
Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has upheld a decision by the
Newlin Township Zoning Board to allow Nextel Communications, Inc., to
build a telecommunications tower in Newlin.

The opinion, written by President Judge Joseph T. Doyle, upheld a trial
court decision to defer to the town's zoning board.  The citizens
opposing the tower said the board erred when it defined Nextel's
proposed tower as a "radio transmitter."

The Newlin Township zoning ordinance limits the types of buildings that
can be constructed but allows the board to grant a "special exemption"
to authorize the construction of a "radio or television transmitter."
The ordinance, however, doesn't define "radio transmitter."

The citizens asserted that the "radio transmitter component of the
facility is but a minor element" and said the 150-foot tower "falls far
outside any commonly understood definition of 'radio transmitter.'"
They argued that because the tower doesn't fit into any other category,
the zoning ordinance doesn't permit it to be constructed within the
township.

Judge Doyle ruled that the record supported the board's decision.  The
judge noted that testimony by a Nextel engineer demonstrated that the
tower was an integral part of the facility.  He concluded that the
"entire system operates together in order to transmit the necessary
information for the cellular network to function."

Senior Judge William J. Lederer and Judge Bonnie B. Leadbeter joined
Judge Doyle's opinion.  (Case no. 3182 C.D. 1999 Robert and Loren
Pearson v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newlin Township and Nextel
Communications of the Mid Atlantic, Inc.)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures

The Public Service Commission today approved procedures proposed by
Ameritech-Michigan to protect customers from identity theft.  The
commission had ordered Ameritech to file the proposed procedures when it
fined the company $1.5 million for identity theft-related violations of
the Michigan Telecommunications Act.  (9/25/00 p.m.)  The PSC's decision
responded to a complaint filed by customer Patricia Nelski.

In July 1996 Nelski discovered that a fraudulent Ameritech telephone
account had been opened in her name.  She contacted Ameritech and was
told she wouldn't be held responsible for charges to the account.  She
subsequently learned that she had been denied credit and employment
because Ameritech failed to clear her credit record as promised.

Under the procedures approved today, Ameritech must (1) accurately
verify the identity of persons ordering service, (2) ensure that
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit reporting bureaus
are attributed to the responsible parties, and (3) keep records on
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit bureaus for the
duration of any adverse credit reports that result.  The company also
must ensure that all negative credit information is removed from credit
reports when an account has been deemed fraudulent, and it must respond
in a timely manner to customer complaints about fraudulent accounts or
identity theft.  (Case no. U-12700)

SECTION 251/252
MICHIGAN
PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates

The Public Service Commission today approved Ameritech-Michigan's
proposed revisions to its reciprocal compensation rate structure.
Ameritech had proposed a bifurcated rate structure that reduces the
current charges applied to minutes of use and shifts recovery to a setup
charge applied to each call, without regard to duration.

The commission noted that Ameritech's showing that a rate structure
predicated on separate per-call setup and per-minute usage charges
better reflects cost causation wasn't rebutted by any of the other
carriers participating in the case.  Moreover, the PSC said, the revenue
effects of the Ameritech plan are largely neutral to the extent that the
traffic being exchanged reflects the average holding time used to set
the charges.
The PSC rejected Ameritech's request to exempt foreign exchange service
from payment of reciprocal compensation.  The commission said Ameritech
failed to explain whether, or how, the means of routing a call placed by
one local exchange carrier's (LEC's) customer to another LEC's point of
interconnection affects the costs that the second LEC necessarily incurs
to terminate the call.  Historically, the PSC said, the routing of a
call hasn't depended on whether it's a local call or a toll call.

Moreover, the commission said, the discretion that competitive local
exchange carriers exercise in designing their local calling areas is a
competitive innovation that enables them to provide valuable
alternatives to an ILEC's traditional service.  The PSC saw no reason to
change these standards, particularly when the result would be an
unnecessary restriction on the services the customers want and need.
(Case no. U-12696 - In the matter of the application of Ameritech
Michigan to revise its reciprocal compensation rates and rate structure
and to exempt foreign exchange service from payment of reciprocal
compensation)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
HAWAII
Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud

Sen. Brian Kanno (D., District 20) has introduced SB 97 to make
telemarketing fraud a criminal offense.  An individual would be
committing telemarketing fraud if the person--with the intent to defraud
or misrepresent--obtained, or attempted to obtain, the transfer of
possession, control, or ownership of property from another person
through communications conducted at least in part by telephone.

SB 97 would make telemarketing fraud a "class B" felony.  The measure
awaits consideration by the Senate Economic Development and Technology
Committee; the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection, and Housing
Committee; and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC fines companies for 'slamming'

The Public Service Commission today fined Accutel Communications, Inc.,
and Advantage Plus $43,600 and $105,000, respectively, for "slamming."
The commission's order adopts an administrative law judge's
recommendations.  (11/7/00 p.m.)

The ALJ found that Advantage Plus had performed an unauthorized switch
of a residential customer's telecom service provider and billed
unauthorized charges to that same customer's business.  Advantage Plus
is a reseller of Qwest Corp.'s services.

The ALJ also found that Accutel had charged the same business for a
service for which the telecom service provider hadn't received an
initial affirmative order.  (Case no. U-12545)

ADVANCED SERVICES
UTAH
Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools

Sen. Beverly Ann Evans (R., District 26) has sponsored a bill to require
the Utah Education Network (UEN) to work with rural county governments
to establish education resource centers in their counties.  The UEN
maintains an education microwave distribution system, data network, and
other telecom service distribution systems appropriate for providing
video, audio, and data services for public schools and colleges.

SB 124 would require the UEN to set up such centers in at least Beaver,
Daggett, Garfield, Juab, Kane, Morgan, Piute, Rich, and Wayne counties.
The centers would consist of four classroom facilities provided by the
counties, with equipment funded by the state.  The equipment would be
capable of bringing the full benefits of the UEN satellite system to
community residents.  It also would offer residents access to worldwide
databases through multimedia computers and advising services through
online technologies.

The bill would allocate $743,000 to the UEN to fund the centers.  Of
that appropriation, $441,000 would go toward one-time costs for
electronic equipment, and $302,000 would be allocated for ongoing costs.

SB 124 awaits committee referral.

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
FLORIDA
Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed

Florida has seen little improvement in local phone competition since the
U.S. Congress passed the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 nearly
five years ago, according to a new report from the Consumer Federation
of America (CFA).  CFA Director-Research Mark Cooper, who wrote the
study, says, "97% of Florida's local residential market is still under
the control of the incumbents--BellSouth [Telecommunications, Inc.],
Sprint [Corp.], and Verizon [Communications, Inc.]."

The study recommends several steps the Public Service Commission should
take to foster local competition.  It says the PSC should (1) guarantee
that new competitors can readily access the existing telephone network,
(2) ensure that competitors are charged reasonable prices for network
access and (3) ensure that operation support systems can accommodate the
demands of new competitors.

Local competition can begin to thrive in Florida, as it has in New York
and Texas, only if the PSC requires "the local monopolies to open their
markets on fair and reasonable terms," says Cooper.

The study, titled Florida Consumers Need Real Local Phone Competition:
Fair Access to Monopoly Wires Is the Key, is available at
http://www.consumerfed.org/fl.telecom.0101.pdf.

INTERNET
MISSOURI
Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'

Sen. Mary Groves Bland (D., District 9) has introduced SB 154 to allow
all colleges, universities, and community colleges in Missouri to create
"telecommunity centers" for teaching local residents computer skills.

The telecommunity centers would use the schools' existing information
technology resources to provide the technical staff and technology
necessary to teach local residents how to use current hardware and
software.  Technical staff members could be volunteers or students who
were at least senior-level undergraduates.  Schools could allow students
to earn course credits for working at the centers.

SB 154 also would require each higher-level institution to create a
policy ensuring that "students of the institution are afforded necessary
access to all available information technology resources."

SB 154 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Education.  Its text
is available at
http://www.senate.state.mo.us/01info/billtext/intro/SB154.htm.

INTERNET
VIRGINIA
Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech heritage

Del. James K. O'Brien (R., District 40) has introduced HB 2560 to
authorize the issuance of "special license plates bearing the legend,
Home of the Internet."

The bill has been referred to the Committee on Transportation.  Its text
is available at
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?011+ful+HB2560.

UNIVERSAL SERVICE
IDAHO
PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund

The Public Utilities Commission has rescheduled a Jan 29 hearing on its
high-cost fund for March 20-21.  (11/2/00 a.m.)  The commission
rescheduled the hearing after Qwest Corp. filed a notice stating its
intent to withdraw from a stipulation it had reached with the PUC staff
regarding the fund.  The company said it was withdrawing because "it
realized that it might not have reached a 'meeting of the minds' with
the staff regarding a critical issue:  specific IHCF [high-cost fund]
per-line support for wire centers serviced by Qwest and Verizon"
Northwest, Inc.

Qwest also asked the commission to vacate the current schedule and give
the company an additional 30 days to "either attempt to meet a mutually
acceptable agreement with staff or offer another independent alternative
for the parties' consideration."  After Qwest asked the commission to
vacate the schedule, Verizon and AT&T Communications of the Mountain
States, Inc., made schedule requests of their own.  Verizon and AT&T,
however, wanted the PUC to suspend the schedule indefinitely.

The commission granted Qwest's request and said the company should file
its revised direct testimony by Feb. 5.  Rebuttal testimony will be due
Feb. 28.  (Case nos. GNR-T-97-22 and GNR-T-00-2)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
TEXAS
ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

A Public Utility Commission administrative law judge has scheduled an
April 24 hearing to consider a "slamming" complaint filed against Axces,
Inc.  Slamming is the unauthorized switch of a customer's telecom
carrier.  Earlier this month, the PUC staff asked the commission to fine
Axces up to $930,000 for "slamming" 186 customers.

The staff said the proposed fine amounted to $5,000 per violation.  It
said the penalty was "appropriate" because the PUC views slamming as one
of the "most serious" violations that a telecom provider can commit.
The staff also said stiff fines were warranted to deter Axces from
committing future violations.  The staff pointed out that Axces'
"pattern of slamming" has continued despite the fact that the company
paid a $100,000 penalty to the PUC in 1998 for alleged slamming
activities.  (01/9/01 a.m.)

The ALJ determined that prehearing conferences should be held every
three weeks to resolve any outstanding discovery issues and preliminary
matters.  The conferences are scheduled for Jan. 26, Feb. 16, March 9,
March 30, and April 20.

Staff's prefiled direct testimony is due March 9, and objections to the
staff's testimony are due March 16.  Responses to those objections are
due March 23.  Axces' prefiled direct testimony also is due March 23,
and objections to Axces' testimony are due March 30.  Responses to those
objections are due April 6.

The staff's rebuttal testimony is due April 11, and objections to the
staff's rebuttal testimony are due April 16.  (SOAH Docket no.
473-00-0731 and PUC Docket no. 20934)

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


You might be interested in the attached articles.
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Green/HOU/AZURIX on 02/09/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

Carolyn Green on 02/09/2000 01:24:24 PM
To: John Wodraska/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700

For your amazement & amusement!
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Green/HOU/AZURIX on 02/09/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Steven Lipman" <stevenlipman@earthlink.net> on 02/07/2000 11:02:06 AM

To:	"Pete Parsons" <pparsons@harc.edu>, "Jan McFarland"
<jmcfarland@worldnet.att.net>, Carolyn Green@AZURIX@ENRON, "Jill Halverson"
<jhalver333@aol.com>
cc:

Subject:	Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700

Knowing of the growing interest around the country on the "Big Hat's" race in
the March 7 Democratic primary for the 41st California Assembly District,
Steven Lipman Consulting [a full-service, but not yet for profit company] is
committed to keeping you informed! Here's the link to an article in today's
LA Times. Enjoy!

 http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/natpol/20000207/t000012305.html

 - att1.htm
 - Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal.url


Bob,
 Please review the suggested modifications to be made to the previously sent
confirmations for the above parties with regard to volumes to be processed at
the Lowry Gas Plant in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  If you agree, please have
revised confirmations issued that would be in place of the previously sent
confirmations.  Please note that I only made changes to the price and
quantity to reflect the deal as reviewed with Nelson Ferries and Charlie
Otto.  Please call if you have any questions.


Greg and Georgeanne,

There is a working group reviewing whether and when RMT should file for bankruptcy protection.  Greg's group provided a November 30th trial balance for RMT, but we need a more "user friendly" and more recent (if possible) balance sheet and income statement for RMT.  As I'm not sure which one of you I should ask, given all the developments with the new trading company, I am sending this request to both of you.  Consequently, could you please have someone in your group send us this information?  Also, we need more information on ERMT, a company that was set up in November.  Is there someone in your group to get information on this company?

As always, I really appreciate your help.

Best regards,
Susan


Hi Jule- thought about your comment about Fidelity. You need to get those checks and monthly statements. Call them and tell them to get that stuff to you. Don't call the jerk. Call the 800 number. You should carefully manage your money. It is very important. Love, Dad.


Here is an initial draft from our attorneys in California on the state
processes that could be required.  In my experience, the single biggest issue
the utilities have is the transfer of the rights of way -- there are
thousands of these -- each like an individual contract.  If the state tried
eminent domain, it seems like it could face a long-time in the courts to
finish that process.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


Duane Hart has been offered opportunities at two other companies that provide
compensation packages far more lucrative than anything EOTT can afford or
justify at this time.

Last night I had dinner with another candidate, Nick Bednorz, VP and
Controller of Coral Energy, that I would like you to meet.
Nick comes highly recommended by Stan Horton and Rod Hayslett.

Shelly will coordinate the meetings.


I have gone through the Version 3 of the ABB agreement that you forwarded. I
have compared it to the other versions and changes I was aware of (the
technical areas only). I have attached a red-lined version with edits. Also,
here are my notes on each of the changes:

Section 5.1 of the Agreement - earlier versions of the Agreement contained
the purchase amount here. As I commented by phone, by my calculation the
total purchase amount for these two units would be $1,713,000.00, or
$856,500.00 each. By my records, the original purchase amount for these units
was $782,000.00. A change was made in November 2000 that increased each unit
by $49,500.00. Another change in December 2000 increased each unit by
$25,000.00. These increase amounts were confirmed by ABB on 11/28/00 and
12/18/00. The Version 3 document eliminates this purchase amount.. However,
sections 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 contain amounts of $78,200.00, 10% on the original
purchase amount of one unit. Should these values be changed?

Exhibit B1:
Section 5.1.2 b) and c) - these are revisions requested by the contractor.
They are reasonable requests if they can be accommodated by ABB. I don not
know if these changes were coordinated directly between the contractor and
ABB.

Section 9.1 - minimum ambient temperature
Minimum ambient temperature should be minus 5 degrees C. This corresponds to
23 degrees F, the design basis temperature. The minus 13.3 degrees C
requested by the contractor is incorrect.

Section 9.5.5 - Surge Arrestor rating
This is a new request from the contractor. It appears acceptable.

Section 10 - Voltage Rating
This is a correction to indicate a voltage of 138,000

Section 10 - Type of Cooling
This is added information on type of cooling (FOA) as provided by ABB in
thier revised data sheets.

The other changes in Sections 9 and 10 correspond to information previously
provided to ABB in conference calls and communications from the contractor.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 07:19 AM -----

	"Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
	11/17/2000 04:41 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: RE: Draft letter to the CPUC

Richard,

We are not going to send this letter until Monday.  We want to send the
formal objections to the subpoena concurrently, and Mike Smith cannot review
the EES objections until Monday.  Mike Day believes that a delay until
Monday is not a problem.  Let me know if you have any concerns.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 2:24 PM
To: PMeringolo@brobeck.com
Cc: Fergus, Gary S.
Subject: Re: Draft letter to the CPUC

Everyone has signed off on the letter. Go ahead and send.

                    "Meringolo,

                    Peter"                To:
"'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
                    <PMeringolo@br        "'msmith1@enron.com'"
<msmith1@enron.com>, "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'"
                    obeck.com>            <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
"'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'" <David_Aamodt@pgn.com>,
                                          "'Christian.Yoder@enron.com'"
<Christian.Yoder@enron.com>,
                    11/16/2000            "'mday@gmssr.com'"
<mday@gmssr.com>, "Fergus, Gary S."
                    03:27 PM              <GFergus@brobeck.com>, "Stephen C.
Hall (E-mail)" <schall@stoel.com>
                                          cc:

                                          Subject:     Draft letter to the
CPUC

Please let either Gary or me know your thoughts and comments regarding the
below draft letter to the CPUC.

Thanks,

Peter

> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
> ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION
> ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
>
>
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>    Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation
("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>    I am writing in response to the various voicemail exchanges and
> phone calls between Michael Day, on behalf of the Enron Entities, and
> yourself during the past few weeks.  Here is the current status as we
> understand it.  Based upon the agreements we reached between October 6,
> 2000 and October 18, 2000 (date of your confirming email) the Enron
> Entities have made the following document productions in response to the
> subpoenas served by California Public Utilities Commission (the
> "Commission"):
>
> *  October 13, 2000  Bate Nos. Enron Entities 000001-000025 on behalf
> of all Enron Entities Responsive to Request Nos. 1-11, 20.
>
> *  October 27, 2000 Bate Nos. P000001-002115 on behalf of Portland
> General Responsive to Request Nos. 12, 14, 16 and 18.
>
> *  November 14, 2000 Bate No. Enron Entities 000026 (Diskette with
> EES/EEMC retail data) Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13, 15 to 17,
> and 19.
>
> *  November 15, 2000 Bate No. P002116-002117 (Diskettes with Portland
> General Data, which include approximate 355,000 wholesale transactions)
> Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13 to 17, and 19.
>
> We believe with these productions, we have complied with the October
> 6-18th agreement with respect to Portland General and EES/EEMC.  As you
> know, these productions were all made reserving the Enron Entities rights
> to object or challenge the subpoenas and reserving any claims, defenses,
> objections, jurisdictional or otherwise, or other responses.
>
>    We originally had hoped to have all of the Transactional Data for
> EPMI, as defined in our October 6th email, available for production by
> October 27th.  However, we were also mindful of your expressed
expectation
> that any data provided be useful and reliable.  The collection of data
you
> requested in the subpoenas is neither kept electronically in the same
> location nor organized as you requested it.  In fact during our review of
> some of the data we found significant errors that called into question
the
> methodology by which the data was extracted from existing information.
> When it became apparent that we could not accurately estimate how long it
> would take to get reliable data given the volume of transactions
involved,
> we informed you of the problem.  We now understand that if we cannot give
> you a firm date when the balance of the Transactional Data will be
> available, the Commission believes it will have no choice but to seek to
> compel production before the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission
> ("FERC").  We understand the pressure that you must be under to get data
> immediately, but we cannot, at this time, give you another date in the
> immediate future by which we are certain that we will be able to produce
> accurate data.
>
>    Moreover, during the iterim between October 18th and today, a number
> of significant events have occurred that we believe bear on the subpoenas
> served on the Enron entities.  First, we understand that many other
> parties who were served with the same subpoenas have not provided the
> detailed information requested and have objected on a variety of very
> sound legal grounds.  Second, the Commission itself has, without a
hearing
> on the motion, unilaterally revised the proposed protective order that is
> supposed to govern these productions and summarily denied other changes
> sought by other parties served.  Third, the Commission has filed its
> motion before FERC seeking an order compelling the production of the data
> from those other parties that have objected and seeking an expedited
> hearing and production schedule.  We note that the reasons stated in the
> motion before FERC as the basis for the production are materially
> different than the reasons originally stated in the ex parte application
> to the Commission's own Administrative Law Judge who issued the
subpoenas.
> Finally, FERC itself has completed its investigation and has issued a
> tentative order as of November 1, 2000.
>
>    Originally, the Enron Entities had been prepared to accept "most
> favored nation" treatment with respect to protective orders and requests
> by others to limit the scope of the subpoenas and produce information
that
> was available.  However, given both the Commission's stated urgent need
> for an immediate answer that EPMI cannot in good faith give despite
> substantial effort (date for production of reliable and accurate
> Transaction Data) and the uncertainty created by the above described
> intervening events, EPMI believes it has no choice but to serve its
formal
> objections and responses to the subpoenas and await the Commission's
> threatened motion to compel before FERC.
>
>    We also understand from our discussions with you that the Commission
> has created various lists or categories for the entities that have been
> served with subpoenas.  We understand that there is a list for those
> entities that have been cooperating, a list for those who have been
> delaying and a list for those who have been objecting and exercising
their
> rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We understand that the Commission
> intends to punish, by whatever means it has available, those entities
that
> object and exercise their rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We deplore
> these tactics, but despite all of the efforts to cooperate described
> above, we understand that EPMI may in fact be moved from the cooperating
> list to the group to be punished for exercising its rights.
>
>    If you have and questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
> contact me.
>
>                                        Sincerely,
>
>
>
>                                        Gary S.
> Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Throughout this week, we have a team from UBS in Houston to introduce and discuss the NETCO business and associated HR matters.

In this regard, please make yourself available for a meeting tonight beginning at 6:00 pm at The Houstonian.  For those outside of Houston, video conferencing arrangements have been made.  In Portland, the meeting will be held in Mt Adams.  In Calgary, the meeting will be held in video room #1.

Time:		6:00 pm
Place:		The Houstonian
		111 N Post Oak Lane
		Houston, TX
		(713) 680-2626
Meeting Name:	"Lone Star"

Please keep this invitation confidential.

If you are unable to make this meeting, please advise Amy FitzPatrick (x52729) or Julie Clyatt (x33256).


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
03:49 PM ---------------------------
   ENA Public Relations
From: ENA Public Relations@ENRON on 03/09/2001 08:21 AM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc:
Subject: ENTOUCH NEWSLETTER

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

East Power Midwest Origination
Beginning late 2000, East Power Marketing implemented a complete market
coverage strategy.  Since then, EPMI has begun to develop relationships with
hundreds of small &mom & pop8 municipalities.  Many of these munis had no
prior contact with Enron.  As a result, East Power has executed a valuable 30
MW energy call option term purchase from the Municipal Energy Agency of
Nebraska (MEAN) at a congested location.

Enron Industrial Markets
EIM has renamed Pulp, Paper & Lumber to Forest Products in order to fully
encompass our multiple product offerings.

East Power Development
The Planning and Zoning Commission for Pompano Beach, FL approved ENA's
rezoning request and site plan for the Pompano Beach Energy Center, a 510
megawatt peaking power plant.  On the rezoning request, the vote was 6 to 1,
and on the site plan, the vote was 7 to 0.  The rezoning request will be
forwarded to the Pompano Beach City Commission for their review.
Additionally, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has
announced its intention to issue an air permit for the facility.

Next steps include a DEP public hearing on Monday, March 26, and the first of
two votes on the rezoning request before the Pompano Beach City Commission,
which is scheduled for Tuesday, March 27.

IN THE NEWS

EWS Brown Bag Lunch
Mark Your Lunch Calendars Now!  The next one is scheduled for Thursday, March
15, 2001 featuring Ray Bowen. He is the COO of EIM and will be discussing
Enron Industrial Markets.

Open Forum Editorial in The San Francisco Chronicle  by Kenneth Lay    3/1/01
What has happened in California over the past four years is not
deregulation.  It is misguided regulation.

Deregulation does not mean eliminating customer choice and competition for
most customers.
Deregulation does not mean limiting new market entrants.  Fewer than five
percent of customers in California are served by competing suppliers.

Deregulation does not mean creating a single central power pool from which
all participants must buy and sell their wholesale power; the state Power
Exchange effectively replaced three monopoly buyers with one monopoly buyer.

Deregulation does not mean buying all of your commodity at the last minute,
on the spot market, rather than planning ahead and purchasing most of the
power under long-term contracts that lock in prices.

The situation in California is the result of continued regulation,
complicated by a series of natural and man-made factors.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Lowell Bezanis, Owen Zidar
EIM   - Eric Holzer, John Ovanessian
ENA  - Mecole Brown, Nita Garcia, Ambroshia Hunter, Nikole Jackson, Junichi
Sugiura, Theresa Zucha, Cynthia Gonzalez, Scott Wilson, Kenton Schaefer,
Emily Butler

Transfers
ENA - Joseph Hardy, Nancy Vu, Lloyd Miller, Jinsung Myung, Patrick Johnson,
Jason Wolfe, Andrew Miles, Sara Shackleton
EIM  - Sherri Baldwin, Debbie Chance, Rob Saltiel
EGM - Jody Crook, Neithard Foley, Juan Paysse, Bhavna Pandya, Courtney
Campbell, Terri Denning

NUGGETS & NOTES

"It is on the high side of medium to high." --Tim Battaglia, Vice
President/Steel Origination EIM (discussing the probability of a transaction
closing).

&I wanna see the phone glued to your ear!8 -- Ed Baughman, Vice
President/East Power Mid Market ENA

&REFERRALS, REFERRALS, REFERRALS!  It pays to know good people." ) Ambroshia
Hunter Perry/HR ENA

You requested more info(. Proud parents Michelle Vitrella, PR coordinator,
and husband David Vitrella, manager of trading, have named their baby girl
Lily Ann. She was born on February 27, 2001.

Learning at the Speed of Enron
If you haven't had a chance to log on to www.investinme.enron.com, you're
missing a fast and easy way to gain the information you need to get ahead and
stay ahead. This new EWS training site combines everything you loved about
Ernie with much, much more.  Enron employees now have the ability to register
for hundreds of classes on industry-related topics anywhere in the world.
Don't have time to attend a classroom training? No problem, you can now use
the web site to search for books, videos, CD ROM, and web-based training. All
the learning you want, anytime, anywhere.  Just go to
www.investinme.enron.com and start building your future today!

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL FLASH

Enron Wind
Enron Wind has purchased the factory facilities of the Dutch company, Aerpac,
Europe's second largest producer of wind turbine rotor blades.  This move
represents a significant step towards fulfilling Enron Wind's strategic
objective of manufacturing high-quality and technically sophisticated rotor
blades in-house.  Enron Wind will be using its own moulds to produce the
rotor blades.  The acquisition of the Almelo-based factory facilities, which
are only 60 kilometres from Enron Wind's facilities in Salzbergen, Germany,
gives the company a convenient base for European wide distribution.

Enron applies for Greek electricity trading license
Enron, through its subsidiary Enron Power MEPE, has applied for an
electricity supply license for Greece, for the 34% market opening on Feb 19th
2001.  If the license application is successful, Enron will be allowed to
approach customers consuming more than 100GWh up to a combined total peak
capacity of 350MW.  In total, 4 companies have applied for power trading
licenses (Enel, ATEL and Cinergy also applied).

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


hey:
just wondering if you're still up for sailing lessons and if you've found out
anything???


Here is a quick summary of our meeting on capacity options on TW.  Bill
Cordes, Steve Harris, Shelley Corman, John Buchanan, Tony Pryor, and members
of the TW Commercial Group (including Jeff Fawcett) were present.

 1.  The group all agreed that while it is probably a good idea to mention
that the options could be sold in an online format, we do not want to limit
ourselves at this point and should probably just state that a notice will be
posted on the TW website whenever we have options for sale.

 2.  Price:  the filing needs to include a discussion of how price will be
determined, and how capacity will be awarded.  We might also need to include
an estimate of how much revenue options will generate in the first year.

 3.  Need to add a short explanation of where TW will get the capacity if a
shipper exercises its call option.

 4.  Should frame the service as requiring an exception to current Commission
policy on reserving capacity...not asking Commission to abandon its policy
altogether.

 5.  May need to address:  assignability of options; limitation on damages
for nonperformance.

 6.  Timeline:
  - Turn around a new draft and get further comments (July 3 week)
  - Get Market Services started on its analysis of the new service
  - Begin contacting customers to get their buy-in (Lorraine already has a
producer/customer very interested in supporting our filing)
  - Start the process of getting Board approval (sales of options require
Board approval at Enron)
  - Meet informally with FERC to discuss (Shelley is working on)
  - Make the filing at FERC (we did not try to specify a date yet)

If you have any further comments please let me know.  I am going to try to
get a new draft out by next Friday a.m.


Attached is a one page summary on Ross.  Look forward to speaking with you
this afternoon at 4:15pm.  Thanks.  SR:-)


<<ClintonSPR.doc>>

============
David Nemtzow
Alliance to Save Energy
nemtzow@ase.org <mailto:nemtzow@ase.org>
ph: (202) 857-0666
fax: (202) 331-9588
http://www.ase.org <http://www.ase.org>

 - ClintonSPR.doc


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040706.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:   0.02)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DANTE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:   0.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DANTE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Date:  March 12, 2002
From:  Ray Bowen, Office of the Chief Executive

One of Accounting and Controls primary objective is ensuring that internal accounting controls are properly designed, implemented and enforced throughout the company.  Enron's Executive Management and Board of Directors are committed to this objective.

A new group, Accounting Controls and Procedures, has been established to provide centralized management in meeting this responsibility.

Accounting Controls and Procedures will report directly to Dick Lydecker, Enron's Chief Accounting Officer, and will be led by Rick Carson.  Joining Rick will be Donna Lowry who will manage compliance and records retention controls.

To be effective, everyone in the organization must be an active participant in the control process.  In this regard, your cooperation with Rick and his team is appreciated.


-----Original Message-----
From: Shively, Hunter S.
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:32 AM
To: Arteaga, Airam
Subject: please send to group


how was happy hour?  i was golfing when you called and i didn't get the message until late.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:58 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/13/2000 05:10 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird
Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dow Jones Reports that PG&E Buys Forward for 5.6 cents for two years


ddeveny@txuenergy.com

dave would love to see cv from you


Philip,

Thanks for keeping me in mind. Yes, I would be interested.

Vince

"Philip Merrill" <garpny1@home.com> on 11/30/2000 04:47:20 PM
Please respond to <garpny1@home.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: GARP Credit Derivatives Discussion Group

Vince

We are starting a credit derivatives discussion group in New York.

Is this something you would be interested in?

Like FAS 133 an 800-Call-IN number will be provided for Houston
participants.

Our first meeting will be in a week or so.

Regards,

Philip Merrill
Garp Regional Director, New York
973-258-1540


Shirley:  We've also been in touch with Frank.  He wasn't going to receive
his class schedule until yesterday, so we will follow up today and find a
mutually convenient date.

Molly

Shirley Crenshaw
01/16/2001 09:51 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Qian (Frank) Feng Interview with the Research Group

Hi Molly:

I guess it is time to try and schedule Frank's interview.  We would like to
bring him in sometime around the first of February (when Krishna returns).

Please contact him and see what a good time for him would be.

Attached is his resume and Interview Request form.

 - enron_resume.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
09:42 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           12/20/2000 05:35 PM

To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Qian (Frank) Feng Interview with the Research Group

You, too, Shirley.   We'll be back in touch.

Molly

Shirley Crenshaw
12/20/2000 02:07 PM
To: Cheryl Arguijo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Molly
Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Qian (Frank) Feng Interview with the Research Group

Hello Molly and Cheryl:

Attached is Frank's resume.  We still have quite a bit of time as we want to
schedule this for after Krishna returns on the 25th of January.

This position would be for the Research Group directly, and would include
all of Vince's direct reports.

Thanks and MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!!


Kim, I'm at a CNG shipper meeting in Florida next Wed - Fri.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           05/11/2000 10:48 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adrial
Boals/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Buis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Capacity Trading on EOL

Please let me know if you are able to attend a meeting regarding Capacity
trading on EOL..  The meeting will take place next Friday, May 19 11:00- 1:00
in EB30C1.  Please respond by tomorrow.  Lunch will be provided.

Thanks


Greetings:

I'll be out on vacation all next week, but will be periodically checking
voicemail and email.

Best,
Jeff


- SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


Hi Kate,
Just wanted to get a status on this deal.  I sent the final confirm to John
Malowney to review on Friday and have not heard back from him yet.  Can you
find out whether this is okay to send out please.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl
12/08/2000 10:04 AM
To: John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #476578.3 Montana Power Co.

This is a completed confirm letter for this deal.  All 3 legs are confirmed
together with Index language for both on-peak and off-peak indexes.  Please
let me know whether this is ready to fax out.

Thank you,
Kimberly Hundl
Power Documentation


Sally, I wasn't clear in my original memo. This request is per HR to get your approval on re-hires.

	Thanks, George

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, George F.
Sent:	Monday, May 07, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob M
Cc:	Superty, Robert; De Jesus, Frank
Subject:	Re-Hire of Lisa Trofholz

	Lisa Trofholz is a former Enron employee that has applied for and meets  all of the qualifications for the wellhead desk. She left Enron due to the sale of Enron
	Liquid Services gathering assets.

	Lisa reported to me at NNG  as a scheduler for the pipeline. She did an excellent job then and I am sure she will do an excellent job for us on the wellhead desk.
	Her experience with Enron as well as her experience gained since she left, make her uniquely qualified to have an immediate impact in establishing the wellhead 	desk.

	I would appreciate your considerling Lisa for re-hire.


With respect to he Bakersfield Californian on the list below, I am amending
my original approval for this counterparty to approve them to enter into
newsprint swaps and options only.  At this time our list does not reflect the
individual products you are trading.  I understand from Mark Taylor that he
spoke to Jeff Harbert last night about amending your excel spreadsheet to add
the individual pulp and paper financial products, since restrictions such as
this one will occur from time to time.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	07/27/2000 10:21 AM

		 To: Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Click Paper Approvals for 7/25/00

Attached is the referenced list.  The Bakersfield California is approved to
only do newsprint commodity swaps and options.  Therefore, I have turned them
down to trade the current products we have available online.  As our product
base expands, we can send them through again as an amended counterparty if we
offer newprint commodity swaps and options online.


Marie
Could you please contact Lauren Hagerty who will be arriving in Houston this
afternoon (on her way back from Bombay) - please call her at home. I think
she has already prepared the appropriate documentation. If you are unable to
contact her please call me in Bombay on my mobile 91 9820282572.  Thanks

Sandeep


Mike, here are two draft sets of talking points covering Stan's initial phone
call with Ted Davis to discuss whether a settlement meeting would be useful
and the subsequent settlement meeting itself.  Please give me any comments
you have and I'll send to Stan or have available to hand to him at our
meeting, which I understand is scheduled for 9 am on Tuesday.  I'll  be
calling in from Arizona.  Note there is at least one issue we ought to think
about a bit more--whether to have Stan imply there may be other goodies
available other than the Hobbs Line.  I'm inclined to avoid implying that,
but to have Stan primed to pull out additional goodies if necessary.

I have not yet completed a bullet point outline of the settlement proposal
for Stan to send to Davis after Stan and he meet.  As things currently stand
it would basically be identical to the second sheet of talking points.   I
would prefer to finalize that document after we meet with Stan, both to
minimize the paper in front of him at the Tuesday meeting and to allow the
Davis outline to be tailored to reflect the strategy we arrive at with Stan
(I think I'm safe in assuming we will tinker with the strategy a bit on
Tuesday morning).  If we do modify the strategy, I'll also modify the talking
points.

Britt and Barrett, I wanted you to know the timetable in part because, if
Stan decides to go forward,  we need to send Barrett's suggested letter to
Jad verifying continued application of the settlement privilege to Stan and
Ted's discussions.   I intend to call you after the Stan meeting to advise.
Just in case you don't hear from me by late morning Tuesday, please give Mike
a call to confirm whether to send the letter.  I may have fallen into the
Grand Canyon or been bitten by a hila monster.


http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040sd.pdf

go to page D-6 for the capital loss carryover worksheet.

http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sd1.pdf


I would like to request information and application materials for your
advanced studies program in Bologna, Italy, as well as for Master's Degree
study in international relations at Johns Hopkins University. I am interested
in applying for the academic year of 2002-2003, but I'd like to gather all
the necessary information as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Kate Symes
2505 NE 32nd Place
Portland, OR 97212


thats fine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:

Oh by the way, I am going to take my car in on Monday, so maybe you can give me a ride on Monday.  I will let you know, thanks for the offer.  I do not know what I am doing this evening yet.  Probably not have time to do anything, I thought I would.  I am sorry.   I would like to meet for breakfast though.  Hope you have time.

I miss you today.


Apologies to those who already got this from Harry.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 02:20 PM -----

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Rate design for 3 cent Rate increase for PGE/SCE

CORRECTION - last line, Monday, May 14

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 01:16 PM

		 To: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES,
jklauber@llgm.com, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES, Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Rate design for 3 cent Rate increase for PGE/SCE

2 proposed decisions were released last night by the California PUC - one by
the Judge and one by Chairman Lynch.

Direct access customers are exempt from the surcharge.
Each customer class is allocated an equal 3 cents, plus an amount to cover
the shortfall from having residential usage up to 130% of baseline exempt
from the surcharge (as required by law).  Each decision allocates a
substantial portion of the subsidy to non-residential classes, although Lynch
does this to a lesser extent
The new rates become effective June 1, and the shortfall from the actual
effective date of the increase, March 27, through June 1 will be amortized
over 12 months.
Residential rate design - 5 tiers will be put in place; the 5th tier (300+%
of baseline) gets a 35 cent per kwh rate
Non-residential rate design - recommendations to put all of the increase into
summer on-peak were rejected.  About 60% of increase put into summer.
Real Time Pricing was endorsed - will further explore in workshops starting
later in May.  Voluntary program will be started.
In a vindictive outlash, Lynch decision requires federal facilities to pay
market prices under new schedules to be developed by the utilities
Judge's decision seems to require surcharge to show up as a separate line
item; Lynch's decision requires that it not be shown separately

Oral argument occurs Friday and final decision is expected to be voted out
Monday, June 14.


Dear Committee Member,

In preparation for our discussion during the conference call on Thursday  afternoon, attached please find the revised analysis of CalPX's proposed budget  for your review.

Regards,
Michele

Michele M. Biggar
Financial Recovery Services
BDO Seidman  LLP
(310) 557-8210mbiggar@bdo.com
 - AnalysisOfCalPXBudget.doc


Good Morning All,

I just received a call from Samantha; she is very ill today and will be staying home.  If you should need immediate assistance, please feel free to contact me directly.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Keegan Farrell
EB3875
713-345-3317


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/20/2000 06:37
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/20/2000 03:54 PM

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Virginia Power contract


THEY WILL CONDUCT THE MIGRATION TONIGHT...LOGOFF YOUR COMPUTERS BEFORE YOU LEAVE.

THANKS

TJAE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 8:51 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_UBSW Energy
Subject:	DRAFT:  INFORMATION, Please Read: UBSWE Migration postponed

Due to a variety of circumstances we did not migrate employees to the UBSWE environment tonight (Monday, February 4, 2002). We will communicate further details of the migration plan on Tuesday, February 5, 2002.

Thank you for your cooperation in advance, please contact the Resolution Center at x 3-1411 should you have any questions.

UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure


Dear Alejandro and Francisco,

I spoke with both our legal and credit departments in order to answer your
questions.  In regards to an agreement to complete the specific three-year
fixed price financial swap, a "Deemed ISDA" agreement would need to be
enacted.  This document would be modified from the general example that we
previously sent you. A draft agreement would recognise your company's
location in Chile and  recognise the agreement under the Laws of the State of
New York as you requested.

Our legal staff will put together a draft of the "ISDA" for your review, and
we will send it as soon as it is completed.  Please contact me if you have
any additional questions.

Sincerely,

Scott F Griffin
Enron Corp.
Phone: 713-345-3242


I did not get the attachments.  It may be better to send to my home Email --
firewall issues.  My home email is
BRYSONPA@HAL-PC.ORG

Thanks

Allen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 7:56 AM
> To: R-Allen.Bryson@usa.conoco.com
> Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> Subject: Re: Request for two powerpoint presentations from RISK 2000
> conferenc e
>
>
> Allen,
>
> I responded to your message from home.
>
> Please, let me know if you did not receive the attachments.
> AOL malfunctions sometimes.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> "Bryson, Allen" <R-Allen.Bryson@usa.conoco.com> on 06/26/2000 09:17:07 AM
>
> To:   "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Request for two powerpoint presentations from RISK 2000
> conferenc
>       e
>
>
> Vince,
>
> I would like to receive copies of both your energy risk and weather
> presentations from the Risk2000 conference in Boston.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Allen Bryson
> Conoco
>
>
>
>


________________________________________________________________________

Your order from Papa John's pizza will be ready for pickup in
approximately 20 minutes.  In the event that the restaurant has a
question about your order or requires confirmation before your order is
prepared, we will attempt to contact you by telephone.  If we are unable
to reach you by telephone, you will receive an e-mail notification from a
Papa John's customer service representative.
Your order total including tax is $ 53.67 .

Thank you for choosing to order online with Papa John's pizza!

If you have any questions, or need immediate assistance regarding your
order,  please contact us at 1-877-547-7272 to speak with a customer
service representative and refer to Order # 1807217.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000 04:14
PM ---------------------------

Stephen Plauche@ENRON
03/30/2000 01:11 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Take me out to the ...

Susan,
 I find that you have a midly attractive sense of humor and a cynical side to
you that separates you from the rest of the tribe.  Its funny you mentioned
the Astros game.  I was actually thinking of inviting you (since I have two
tickets to tonight's game and all) but you have turned me down so many times
in the past I decided to go with a more conservative pick.  Anyhow, since I
absolutely detest Woody's and all of my bold suggestions for other venues
consistently gets dissed by the group's brain trust, please take me off of
this distribution list.  Have a nice day.

Steve

Susan M Scott@ECT
03/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: val.generes@ac.com, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shanna
Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yvette Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
Feather/Enron_Development@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Alon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson
Kriegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Take me out to the ...

Oh wait, I can't go to the ball game because I couldn't take a day off from
work to stand in the Enron lobby (or send my secretary to do it for me).

For all of you who have managed to snag tickets for tonight's game
congratulations and you suck.  For the rest of us stuck out in the cold I
suggest the only viable alternative before us is to drown our sorrows in a
cold bottle of beer (or two, or three...).  I realize the mass email has been
MIA the last two weeks.  For some this may have been a welcomed relief.  For
others there may have been some concern that they had been cut-off from the
distribution.  At present no one has been removed from the distribution, but
it is undergoing an audit.  Should it be determined that it is necessary to
remove an individual from the list for any reason that individual will be
notified and given an explanation.  If anyone would like to know the causes
for expulsion you can write to:  I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE CARES IF THERE ON
THIS DISTRIBUTION OR NOT BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE WE SEEM TO GO IS WOODY'S
EVERY THURSDAY BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:00.

On that note, see you guys at Woody's tonight around 9:30 or 10:00.


STAR Information Technology brings has the tools needed to help energy
companies gain knowledge. If it's information from OASIS to Market prices.
The events that change prices such as weather and more are always just one
click away with STAR Information Technologys' powerful portal tools. Our
Portal products are the difference between seeing and doing. Hosting dynamic
applications such as on-line reports, calendars, e-mail, and commerce
services create a one-stop shop for users to go about almost all of their
daily tasks: analyzing customer trends, checking schedules, viewing revenue-
or project-related performance metrics, and buying or selling products.
Combining all the information relevant to users' work with the ability to
act on that information enables organizations to get more done.
Five Government Agencies Deploy Plumtree Corporate Portal at Hundreds of
Facilities-
The Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), Department of Energy (DOE),
Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health and Army Public Affairs
Center are deploying a Corporate Portal at facilities across the country as
part of ongoing governmental initiatives to maximize efficiency, develop
more online content and provide private sector levels of customer service.
The Plumtree Corporate Portal integrates regulatory, enforcement and
incident database reports, enterprise applications and Internet services
into the agencies' portals as Portal Gadgets(tm), plug-in modules that embed
components of applications and interactive Internet services in a
personalized portal page. The Portal growth in the public sector is driven
by its success applying business technology to the specific challenges of
government, empowering federal agencies to simplify access to their data,
reduce paperwork, benefit from the resources on the Internet and share
information securely with their employees, contractors and constituencies.
For more information on how STAR Information Technology can help your
business turn knowledge into power contact us today at 508-359-6891 Ext 115.

Christopher K. Heisler
Product Manager
508-359-6892 Ext 115
www.starit.com
cheisler@starit.com

We Make Knowledge Power


Chris / Kay:

I talked with John today and told him about Northwestern. I basically said we
were close to agreement on doing a project in Montana for the first unit,
with the destination of the second undetermined at this time. I asked him not
to disclose this to the rest of GE until our deal is signed. He was very
positive on this.

I also mentioned the air filter, and he stated that he thought the LD clock
stopped when the unit was put into storage. I suggested that both GE and
Enron look into this to make sure we're in agreement before we bring a
partner in. He appreciated the suggestion and told me Jeff Darst would get
back to me.

Chris - in the meantime, could you please review the contract on this point?

Thanks.

Ben


Louise,

Your bid:
$200K Base
$100K Sign
$250K Equity

My Offer:
$215K
$100K
$350K

Can we say done at:
$215K
$100K
$300K

?

Parquet has made us a lot of money.  He will continue to make us a lot of money.  He lives in a very expensive city.  I dont want him shopping.

Regards,

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


Let's send it out today.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 01:10 PM -----

	Randy Young@ENRON
	02/20/2001 11:28 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: Organizational Announcement

I am fine with the announcement, as revised.  ry

From: Mark E Haedicke@ECT on 02/16/2001 03:15 PM
Sent by: Janette Elbertson@ECT
To: John Novak/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Organizational Announcement

Below are Mark Haedicke's revisions to the announcement.

The purpose of this memo is to share with you the new We are pleased to
announce organizational changes that have been implemented in to the Enron
South America legal department in response to the recent reorganization and
realignment of the principal Enron Wholesale Services business units
operating in the region, Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets.

Randy Young, currently General Counsel of ESA, will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron.  Replacing him will be John Novak, who will
become General Counsel of ESA, reporting to Mark Haedicke.  The ESA legal
department will be responsible for supporting all Enron Americas and Enron
Global Assets businesses in the region.  Additional legal resources,
coordinated by Lance Schuler, will be provided from EWS - Legal in Houston to
support ESA's wholesale activities.  John will also work closely with Bruce
Lundstrom, General Counsel of EGA, to coordinate legal support with respect
to the EGA businesses in the region.  An organizational chart describing the
new structure is attached.

We believe This new structure will enable us to continue to provide quality
legal support across business lines within South America while improving
coordination and providing additional support from Houston for Enron's
existing operating businesses, as well as the new business development
initiatives under way in the region.

	John Novak@ENRON
	02/16/2001 02:02 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Organizational Announcement

Mark, Bruce and Randy:  Below is a draft reorg memo and an updated org chart
for your review and comment.  The org chart is a bit dense so any suggestions
on how to clean it up would be welcome.  Thanks.

Rgds,
 John

The purpose of this memo is to share with you the new organizational changes
that have been implemented in the Enron South America legal department in
response to the recent reorganization and realignment of the principal Enron
Wholesale Services business units operating in the region, Enron Americas and
Enron Global Assets.

Randy Young, currently general counsel of ESA, will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron. Replacing him will be John Novak, who will
become general counsel of ESA, reporting to Mark Haedicke.  The ESA legal
department will be responsible for supporting all Enron Americas and Enron
Global Assets businesses in the region.  Additional legal resources,
coordinated by Lance Schuler, will be provided from EWS - Legal in Houston to
support ESA's wholesale activities.  John will also work closely with Bruce
Lundstrom, general counsel of EGA, to coordinate legal support with respect
to the EGA businesses in the region.  An organizational chart describing the
new structure is attached.

We believe this new structure will enable us to continue to provide quality
legal support across business lines within South America while improving
coordination and providing additional support from Houston for Enron's
existing operating businesses as well as the new business development
initiatives under way in the region.

Mark Haedicke


Hector/Valeria,

Do we have a rule against heaters?  If not, that seems to be the easiest
solution, as well as the "dress warm" advice.  I think that moving him would
not be good -- his isolation could work against our goals here.

Your thoughts?

Michelle


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022823.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


Never mind.  Lee sent it.

Kay Mann
04/04/2001 02:40 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: AIP

Hi there,

Could someone email me the latest version of the AIP?

Thanks,

Kay


O.K.!  Just to keep you appraised of what I'm doing,  I have left a message with Bob Sullivan @ CISO and I spoke to WAPA.  I think the call to WAPA was just to notify them that they won't be managing Shasta's transmission position for the term of our deal.  I'm going to be working with Bob Sullivan to create procedures for scheduling purposes.  Not sure if you want to stay in the loop for that?  You can update Gerry though, for me.  I appreciate your help!

Thanks

Diana

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyer, Laird
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:22 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	RE: Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake

Diana,

Great work.  Is there anything you need me to do?

If everything is in place, I will contact Gerry Cupp at Shasta letting him know.  Or, if he needs to do something, I will get that started.

Thanks,

Laird

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	'vrl1@pge.com'
Cc:	Rosman, Stewart; Dyer, Laird; Buerkle, Jim; Crandall, Sean
Subject:	Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake

Vicky,

Thank you again for you assistance with this process.  As you requested, this is our notification to PG&E of our purchase from the City of Shasta Lake of their COTP Transmission Capacity bi-directionally.  The term of the deal will include the months of November and December 2001.  Also as you requested, I faxed the Confirmation Notice between Shasta and EPMI to your office.  I have listed my office number below if you have any further questions.

Thanks again,

Diana Scholtes
Enron West Trading
503-464-3807
diana.scholtes@enron.com


This is the only one that I have.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------
From: David Mims@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 08/16/2000 04:36 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Arshak Sarkissian/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Iyer/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Joe Edwards/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony Gilmore/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Agreement with EnronOnline

Andy/Bob-

 This is the agreement that I described earlier that will allow us to proceed
with local loop orders in anticipation of a Master Agreement for Services.
Please review this document and let's discuss tomorrow.

Thanks,

DMM
----- Forwarded by David Mims/Enron Communications on 08/16/00 04:31 PM -----

	Steve McCarrel
	08/16/00 04:25 PM

		 To: David Mims/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Iyer/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Cheryl Kondo@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Agreement with EnronOnline

David and Steve, attached is the Agreement between EBS and EnronOnline for
the local loops.  Please send it to anyone else that should receive it for
review.   Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.


Alex tell me a story.


Total gross margin/mmbtu for 2001: (includes merchant activity, peakers, etc.)excludes EES Wholesale=

3,643,000,000/152,246,250=24

gross margin related to gas, power, orig & drift for 2001 (excludes EES Wholesale):

2,705,000,000/152,246,250=18

Total gross margin/mmbtu for 2001: (includes merchant activity, peakers, etc.)includes EES Wholesale=

3,115,000,000/152,246,250=20.50

gross margin related to gas, power, orig & drift for 2001 (includes EES Wholesale):

2,177,000,000/152,246,250=14.29

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Killen, Faith
Subject: What is our

Gross margin per mmbtu for 2001
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Thanks!
The holidays for me were really nice.  All my brothers were home so they kept
me pretty busy.  But it doesn't sound like it compares with yours!  Happy New
Year!
On another, not so exciting, note, I have another question about the EESI
deal #481619.  I just spoke with Judy and they say that the price is supposed
to be $145.00 not $145.05.  Can you check on that one?  It's the only one
still hanging out there from the mess before the holidays.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/03/2001 12:34 PM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EESI #487723

Oops - I guess the deal can't be killed because it contains liquidated
strips. I've changed the confirm status to no confirm, and the energy to
CAISO - so even though the deal has no volume or price, its other details are
correct.

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/03/2001 06:51 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EESI #487723

Hi Kate,
This deal needs to be changed to no confirm (it's a West daily deal).  Also,
it has an NP-15 delivery point with firm energy.
Thanks!
Kim


On behalf of EOTT, an environmental records review was completed for a block
of Koch crude oil pipeline assets located in south Texas.  There were no
issues or environmental deficiencies identified during the review.  A due
diligence was recommended to verify confirmation of the housekeeping
activities presented in the records review.

The air permit modification for the La Plata C/S was received from the state
of Colorado.  This modification allows for additional emissions and fuel use
as a result of  a change in gas quality supplies in the San Juan basin.


Vince,

Please find attached electricity prices file, let me know if you need any
additional information.

Sincerely, Elena


Hi Shona,

Thanks for the update - I was out late last week for the RAC Conference.

Although the urgency of the situation was stressed when requesting this
information, we followed up with an email on October 10 to Dan Houston
(attached below) when it appeared that they would not be able to provide us
with the information - the email gives an overview of the project and
stresses the urgency that we obtain the documentation.

As you note that the information was there, have you already completed this
portion of the deal test?  If not, and you would like for us to complete it,
would you have the documentation sent to me at 3AC1904?

I have not heard anything from Pam regarding a meeting, but today looks
good.  Tomorrow and Wednesday I will be in L.A.

Thanks, Shona,
Ken
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Horton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/23/2000 07:19 AM ---------------------------

Kenneth Horton
10/12/2000 02:22 PM
To: dan.houston@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Doorstep - Settlements

Dan,

The RAC group is currently involved in project Doorstep, which includes a
review of Enron's trading activities worldwide.  Part of the review includes
a deal test for each office,  in which we follow a transaction from inception
through the settlements process.

Kyle Gibson has helped us with the settlements by providing some invoices and
G/L entries for selected transactions.  In fact, given the deadline Kyle
indicated to us regarding his own group's close, we reduced the deal
population in half with the hope of concluding our testing by today.  We
understand that the monthly close will prevent Kyle from helping us any
further until tomorrow at noon at the earliest, and that he will be absent
this afternoon.

Given the large number of trading offices worldwide, each "Doorstep" is of
very short duration.  In fact, part of the testing evaluates the ability of a
group to pull together all of the supporting documentation for a selection of
deals within a short time frame.  Given the "short fuse," we must finalize
our report tomorrow at the latest, and present it on Monday to Sally Beck,
Ted Murphy, Rick Buy, and Rick Carson among others.

It is important that we be able to mention in this report that the
settlements group is able to gather this information quickly for a small
number of transactions (10 overall - although some information has already
been provided by Kyle).  Are there any other resources in your group who
would be able to help us meet this deadline?

Thanks, Dan,
Ken
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Horton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/23/2000 07:19 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           10/19/2000 12:46 PM

To: Kenneth Horton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Lynn
Bellinghausen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Portland doorstep report - finding followed up on

Dear Ken, Leslie,

It looks like we have gotten to the bottom of the missing documentation (it
was there, it was quickly available, Ken did talk to the right people but
they did not see the urgency of getting the information to Ken).  As a
result, I think we have to rewrite the information related to this issue in
the Portland report.  Let's get together for 15 minutes today/tomorrow to
draft a rewrite of these areas.

Just as a side note, we need to wait until the report has been changed before
we share the information with Portland.

Pam - could you organize Ken, Leslie and I getting together?

Thanks

Shona


FYI - Please see below for the final version being sent to the FERC.

Shelley - Would you like me to forward to Rob Kilmer's group?

Thanks,
Elizabeth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth
Subject:	TW California reports w/minor changes

Here is the file you sent me with the following changes:

1.  Question 1: added a comment line after the column headings explaining that Interruptible contracts may be extended from month to month unless terminated on 30 days' notice by either party.  Mary Kay thought we needed some explanation why those contracts showed termination dates in the past.  I eliminated this line, along with the headers, on the CD version of the file.

2.  Question 3:  I just changed the alignment on the text cells for the 3 comment records at the bottom from Centered to Left.


The following prescription number requested for pickup on Wednesday, March 20th is now ready:

*****81-05101

(Only 7 digits of each prescription refill number are shown to maintain privacy)

This prescription can be picked-up at:

WALGREENS
11220 Louetta Rd
Houston, TX 770701406
Pharmacy Phone: (832) 717-4796
Drive Thru: Yes

Pharmacy Hours:
Sun - 10:00A to 6:00P
Mon - 8:00A to 10:00P
Tue - 8:00A to 10:00P
Wed - 8:00A to 10:00P
Thu - 8:00A to 10:00P
Fri - 8:00A to 10:00P
Sat - 9:00A to 6:00P

AUTO REFILLS - Do you have a prescription you need to refill regularly? Our NEW Auto Refills provides you the freedom of setting a prescription to refill automatically without having to place another refill request for it. You can then pick it up at any Walgreens pharmacy, or choose to have it mailed to you.
Learn more about Auto Refills here:
http://www.walgreens.com/help/autorefill.jhtml?rxr=55

____________________________________________________________

WHAT DO YOUR FINGERNAILS SAY ABOUT YOUR HEALTH?

Some fingernail disorders offer clues to medical conditions.  Learn more about how certain changes in your nails can help your doctor develop a diagnosis.

http://www.walgreens.com/library/feature/feat072301.jhtml?rxr=40


A meeting has been scheduled for tomorrow, October 25, at 2:30 PM in EB2071
to discuss the above-referenced subject.

Marion Sczykutowicz
713/853-5331
713/646-8517 (Fax)
msczykut@enron.com


This is a reminder of Enron's Email retention policy.  The Email retention policy provides as follows:

Message Location - Maximum Retention
Inbox - 30 days
Sent Mail Folder - 30 days
Trash/Deleted Items - Rollover from Inbox for one day
Folders - All Email messages placed in folders will be destroyed after one calendar year. This includes public folders in Outlook.

Furthermore, it is against policy to store Email outside of your Outlook Mailbox and/or your Public Folders.  Please do not copy Email onto floppy disks, zip disks, CDs or the network.  Such actions are prohibited and will not be supported by the IT Department.

There will be no exceptions to this policy.


Iris,

I don't have a copy, but they have a lot up on the gas floor (32nd).  Thanks

Fletch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 5:36 PM
To:	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject:	RE: Your book

Hi,

	I was doing some research on the web to find info on arbitrage in power,

	While surfing the web I came across references to your book  "Trading Natural Gas : Cash Futures Options and Swaps"
	Do you have a copy of can take a look at?  If not, I will order a copy via Amazon.com.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Mack, Iris
Subject:	RE: Thanks

thanks for your time!

fletch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Saturday, June 16, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Sturm, Fletcher J.; Presto, Kevin M.; Arora, Harry
Subject:	Thanks

Hi,

	Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedules to meet with me today to tell me about yuur work.

	It sounds very exciting!

	I look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

Regards,
Iris


Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner - was out on Thurs & Fri.  I'm here and
at the Waldorf 355-3000 room 1151.  Still have time for that quick drink?


Mike Swerzbin did not get a confirm from the broker on these deals. They were
two sleeves done with EES, and Driscoll just entered them. Thanks for the
heads up. Any other questions, just give me a call or e-mail.

Kate


Tara,

Sally says Todd's London project is under Barry Pearce (related to
Continental Power) - Barry would need to designate London RC (or James New in
his absence, since Barry is in Houston).

Regarding the "extra" housing costs, this would need to be charged to Todd's
RC in Houston, which is #2182.

Please let me know if you require additional information.

Thanks,
Patti x39106

Tara Rozen
05/17/2000 09:14 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bills in the UK - Todd Hall

Hi, Sally

We may have discussed this already, but I think I have forgotten the answer,
sorry!!

Which RC in London is taking most of Todd's costs? I have some urgent bills
to pay and need an RC.

thanks!
Tara

By the way, are you coming to London?


Concerning the below request, Equilon is approved to buy protection (default
swap) on Northwest Airlines.  I will also look at adding Equilon to the
approved counterparty trading list.

However, before transacting, we need speak with Mark for legal approval.

Rod

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 09:34 AM
---------------------------

Tomas Valnek
03/02/2000 04:28 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject:

We are looking at giving an offer for a bankruptcy swap to Equilon
Enterprises LLC (formerly Shell Aviation US) to cover Northwest Airlines.

Is Equilon an approved counteraprty?

Regards

Tomas


FYI

adr
---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron on 08/03/2000
08:00 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sharon Solon                           07/26/2000 01:39 PM

To: Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie
McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Regulatory Informational Sessions

Please have your people (TW & NNG) in Houston mark their calendars for two
Regulatory
Informational Sessions to be held as follows:

 August 23 2:00-4:30 5C2
 August 24 2:00-4:30 5C2

Items to be covered at each session as follows:

 TW Order 637 Reporting Requirements
 NNG Order 637 Reporting Requirements; LFT& VFT overview of service
  and status of filing and Carlton Resolution

The TW discussion will be held first and the NNG discussion second, but TW &
NNG
personnel can stay for both portions if they wish.


When I meet with Orlando and Joe on Thursday, see if Rebecca McDonald can be present.


To:  	Mr. Richard Parsons (Chairman, Development Committee) - FYI
	Dr. Kenneth Lay (phone)
	Mr. Robert Lumpkins (phone)

Copy:	Ms. Cynthia Panapoulos
	Ms. Roslee Fleming
	Ms. Patty Vanderlin

In preparation for the Development Committee Meeting at 3:00 p.m. - the
attached documents are forwarded to your attention.  This is the first
installment of a two-part email.  Four documents will be forwarded in the
second email.  Please note that the first document in this email provides a
table of contents for proper ordering of the materials.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ecton, Virgil
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 1:51 PM
To:	Hampshire-Cowan, Artis G.
Cc:	Blanchard, Lawanda T.
Subject:	Board Reports

 <<Board of Trustees Table of Content.doc>>

 <<HUBOARDMTGJAN182002.doc>>

 <<January FY 02 Board Report.doc>>
 <<Adv Phase Estimate 2.doc>>
 <<Selected Top Gifts 2.doc>>
 <<Naming Opportunities at Howard University.doc>>

 - Board of Trustees Table of Content.doc
 - HUBOARDMTGJAN182002.doc
 - January FY 02 Board Report.doc
 - Adv Phase Estimate 2.doc
 - Selected Top Gifts 2.doc
 - Naming Opportunities at Howard University.doc


Susan just called me and said she is the CAO for ENA and she should be the one to sign off on the wire requests.  I didn't know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dhont, Margaret
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Manual Wire/Check Requests

I don;t know.  Maybe she has to sign them too

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Dhont, Margaret
Cc: Hamic, Priscilla; Polsky, Phil
Subject: FW: Manual Wire/Check Requests

I decided to wait until tomorrow to do the prepay to go out Monday.

Margaret, for some reason my cash request form has Susan Helton's name on it and she has to sigh the wire I think.  Why wouldn't that be you instead?

[Germany, Chris]
 -----Original Message-----
From: Sewell, Doug
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Barta, Tammy; Becton, Pam; Blackburn, Jody; Brodbeck, Kelly; Cash, Larry; Concannon, Ruth; Confer, Mark; Deane, Ryan; Dennis, Tonya; Dhont, Margaret; Dypiangco, Mark; Elafandi, Mo; Erickson, Cheryl; Fillinger, Mark; Garza, Maria; Germany, Chris; Hamic, Priscilla; Herrmann, Karen; Knippa, Mark; Koerselman, Lisa; Lamb, Marnie; Peoples, Dexter; Quirsfeld, Amy; Rollins, Don; Vos, Theresa
Cc: Baughman, Edward; Castleman, Kent; DeSpain, Tim; Gillespie, John; Gorte, David; Helton, Susan; Jacoby, Ben; Kanellopoulos, Drew; Larson, Bradford; McMichael Jr., Ed; Melendrez, Jesus; Mitro, Fred; Moehlman, Cathy; O'Neil, Murray P.; Parquet, David; Perkins, Mary; Plauche, Stephen; Schneider, Chip; Sharp, Greg; Smith, Jeff E.; Ueckert, Allen W.; Wasaff, George; Zisman, Stuart
Subject: Manual Wire/Check Requests

Folks,

Starting Monday, 4/22/02, manual wire requests will have to go through the Cash Management Committee (CMC) the day before payment.  This means that the request forms and accompanying support documentation will have to be signed by the appropriate signatories of the business unit (BU), the BU CAO and the BU Head and delivered to myself (3-6337) at EBN 714a or Drew Kanellopoulos (3-9424) the day before the CMC meeting.  For example, if you need a wire sent on Wednesday, 4/24/02, you would need to deliver the request to us by the end of the day on Monday, 4/22/02 so the request could be reviewed at the 4/23/02 CMC meeting.  Check requests should be delivered three days in advance.

The only exceptions to this process will be items such as same day payment for prepay commodities.

We appreciate you helping us relieve the incredible stress on the system to get payments more efficiently and please pass this on to anyone I have missed.

Regards,
Doug


Monday, October 8, 2001
Dear Ken:
I am writing to request a meeting with you during the month of November. I plan to be in Houston several times throughout the month, and I'm available to meet at your convenience. I'd like to update you on Children First America's recent successes and upcoming plans, as well as learn more about your interests and priorities.
With the upcoming Supreme Court ruling on school choice, our opportunities have never been better for helping children distressed in innercity schools.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Cheryl Hillen will contact your office to see if an appointment might be arranged.
Best wishes,
Fritz Steiger
PS Rick Waddell and I are old friends from Bentonville.  We have been communicating by email from Brazil regarding school choice.  Perhaps we could meet the next time Rick is in Houston for meetings?
Fritz S. Steiger
501-273-6957


Attached are the Friday peer group reports.
DO NOT UPDATE LINKS WHEN THE FILE IS OPENED!
Please call if you have any questions.

Investor Relations

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 17, 2001

Notice ID: 3188
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: AUCTION OF FTS CAPACITY

Columbia Gas Transmission has posted the following offers of FTS capacity.

Additional details of this capacity may be found in the Columbia Internet
NAVIGATOR system under the Capacity Release Folder, Offers, Offers Summary,
Offer Type, Capacity Auctions, under the following offer numbers:

Offer      Rate        Receipt
 No.     Schedule       Point             Delivery Point

33843      FTS       Leach                Market Area 6
33844      FTS       Leach                Market Area 25
33845      FTS       Leach                Market Area 8
33846      FTS       AO5                  Market Area 36

33827      FTS       Lebanon              Market Area 1
33828      FTS       Leach                Market Area 5
33829      FTS       Kenova Agg           Market Area 5
33830      FTS       Lebanon              Market Area 6
33831      FTS       Leach                Market Area 8
33832      FTS       Kenova Agg           Market Area 8
33833      FTS       Leach                Market Area 8
33834      FTS       Leach                Market Area 9
33835      FTS       Leach                Market Area 10
33836      FTS       Leach                Market Area 10
33837      FTS       Leach                Market Area 12
33838      FTS       Leach                Market Area 15
33839      FTS       Leach                Market Area 15
33840      FTS       Leach                Market Area 19
33841      FTS       Alexander Agg        Market Area 32
33842      FTS       Highland             Market Area 38

For additional information, please contact your Account Representative or your
Customer Services Team.


Would someone provide me the following information on the Sid Richardson point that was set up in September? Thanks

Karen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brostad, Karen
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Sid Richardson Blk 16 Fuel

I have set up POI 78269 for this fuel delivery. I need someone to provide the following information in order to complete setup of the POI.

Is the West Texas Supply basin correct?
Is the East of Thoreau Area correct?
Should the point have GRI yes or no?
What is the Lateral ID to be used?
What is the Marketing Lateral ID to be used?

Thanks

Karen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frazier, Perry
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Brostad, Karen
Subject:	Sid Richardson Blk 16 Fuel

Attached is a GSCR.


Dan Douglass summarized this.  This really puts CA and the ISO on notice that
they cannot confiscate the power as they seem ready to do -- FERC reiterates
that the generators can sell power wherever they want because the cap is a
cap on ISO purchases.  ANd if the ISO want to set a sale price cap it has to
file with FERC, wait 60 days and amend its contract
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 08/01/2000 01:01
AM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 07/31/2000 07:27:24 PM
To: <peter.bray@att.net>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>,
<rschlanert@electric.com>, <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <kmagrude@enron.com>,
<mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <athomas@newenergy.com>,
<bchen@newenergy.com>, <Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<andrew.madden@utility.com>, <ben.reyes@utility.com>,
<chris.king@utility.com>, <david.bayless@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: FERC Order on Morgan Stanley Complaint Against ISO

We have good news on the ISO price caps front.  The FERC has made it
clear that ISO does not have the ability to mandate that generators sell to
ISO at its price caps and that the proper response to inadequate supply is to
lift the price caps.

On Friday, the FERC issued its Order on Complaint in connection with the July
10 complaint filed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. ("MS").  As you may
recall, MS requested FERC to issue a stay of the ISO's maximum purchase price
authority and to direct the ISO to reverse any price cap reductions.  MS
sought Fast Track processing pursuant to Rule 206(h), which was granted by
FERC on the grounds that the complaint "warrants expeditious action."

As a quick background summary for you, last November, FERC issued an order
approving Tariff Amendment 21 which extended ISO's price cap authority
through 11/15/00.  That order stated that the ISO "maximum purchase price was
not a cap on what the seller may charge the ISO, but a cap on what the ISO
was willing to pay."  The Commission said that sellers dissatisfied with the
price cap could "choose to sell those services into the California Power
Exchange or bilateral markets."

FERC notes in Friday's Order that the 6/28 the ISO's Board resolution lowered
the caps to $500 and ISO further directed that, "To the extent permitted by
law, regulation and pre-existing contract, Management shall direct generators
to bid in all their capacity when system load exceeds 38,000 MW."

The MS complaint alleged that the cap reduction was unlawful and would,
"threaten the stability and integroty of the marketplace."  MS also requested
an emergency technical conference to examine ISO's justification for the
price cap reduction.

FERC denied the MS stay request, as well as its request that the $750 maximum
purchase price be reinstated.  The Commission reiterates that it is not
approving a cap on sellers' prices, because they can sell at whatever price
they want.  Rather ISO has simply stated the maximum price it is willing to
pay.  "Because sellers are not required to sell to the ISO, the ISO cannot
dictate their price."

Importantly, however, FERC also states that, "ISO has no more or less ability
to procure capacity and energy than any other buyer of these services....if
the ISO is unable to elicit sufficient supplies at or below its announced
purchase price ceiling (because generators are free to sell elsewhere if they
choose), it will have to raise its purchase price to the level necessary to
meet its needs."  [Emphasis added]  FERC then notes that this may lead to an
increase in Out of Market ("OOM") calls and that OOM calls are not subject to
a maximum purchase price.

Also, with regard to the ISO's resolution stating that generators must bid
their capacity into the ISO markets when system load exceeds 38,000 MW, FERC
states clearly that, "such a requirement is not permitted by our November  12
Order and the ISO tariff."  [Emphasis added]

FERC goes on to say that any requirement to sell to ISO in conjunction with a
maximum purchase price would require significant revisions to ISO's market
rules, which could not be made effective without a corresponding amendment to
ISO's tariff.  This would require 60 days' advance notice, "and could not be
implemented prior to Commission approval.  As stated above, our November 12
Order was clearly based on the premise that the proper response to inadequate
supply (due to a low maximum purchase price) is to raise the maximum purchase
price."

ISO is then "put on notice that any amendment to mandate sales must be
accompanied by a demonstration that this extreme measure is the proper
response to low supplies in the ISO markets."

Concurrences were filed by Commissioners Massey and Hebert.  Massey suggests
that the state has to facilitate solutions to market issues, such as risk
management tools, removing constraints on hedging opportunities, introducing
real time pricing through real time metering and expediting approval of new
generation and transmission projects in California.  Hebert says that the
previous November Order tried to "straddle the fence" and that, "Today, the
Commission at least starts to lean slightly in the right direction of
recognizing that we have a role."  He then reiterates his preference for
removing all price caps.  He also suggests that, "Getting to the bottom of
the problem, in my view, requires us to begin a proceeding to rescind our
approval of the ISO as operator of the California grid.  The record supports
such a move."  He refers approvingly to the Collins resignation letter,
stating that it, "thoughtfully outlines consequences to the market of a
return to 'command and control.' "  Hebert states that, "The independence of
the ISO's governing structure stands threatened.  We should 'stand up,' to
quote the resignation letter."  Hebert advocates opening a section 206
proceeding now, as part of the recently announced inquiry into bulk power
markets, "including the California markets."

This decision makes it clear that ISO cannot lower the caps at tomorrow's
meeting and expect that sellers will be required to sell to it at that
price.  This is an important development and very good news in our ongoing
efforts to seek economic sanity at the ISO.

Please call if you have any questions.

Dan


I haven't seen an e-mail.