Hi Ben,

The conference call went fine with NorthWestern.  They really want to get
their hands on the contract and the change orders.  I told them you were
talking to GE about it, and we will get them the contract ASAP.

Here are the issues:

If we terminate due to their default, they want the additional $5m to be
liquidated damages (ie, our exclusive remedy).

They still want the right to talk to GE, specifically about the terms of the
assignment to the LLC if we are having difficulty getting GE consent.

They want to be able to exercise their call (or take an assignment) of the
turbine contract earlier.  They are willing to take the risk with the GE
warranties.  This is a relationship issue.  It is also their biggest issue.

On an interesting note, Intergen wants you to sign a consent to the transfer
of all the equipment to Sweetgum. Do you know if Lee knows about this?

Ciao,

Kay


As I stated on the phone, the deal is valid and Enron will honor its terms .  I will get a confirmation sent to you.  Thanks

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carl Sulzer GRE/ER Fuel/Plant <Csulzer@grenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Cc:	'Lewis, Mary Jo'
Subject:	Confirmation of Forward Purchase

As we discussed, I never received a confirmation of the May, June and July
forward gas purchase (1,000 per day at Ventura at $2.895/mmBtu).  This
purchase was made through Brian Frihart.  I need to know if Enron plans to
stand behind this purchase.  Without confirmation, I will assume that the
deal is no longer valid.


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Alan B. Aronowitz
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Alan Aronowitz
Report Total: $728.38
Amount Due Employee: $728.38

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Steve and Frank, I would be very interested in your comments on the attached.


we need to make sure we go through this approval for Tammy's upcoming
meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 08:59 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  ENA Office of the Chairman @ ENRON
07/10/2000 05:50 PM

Sent by: Enron NA Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: ENA Employees
cc:
Subject: ENA Meeting and Event Expenditure Approval Process

The approval process initiated in 1998 for all meeting and event expenditures
in excess of $5,000 has enabled ENA to better assess the business value of
events, accurately track our activities and save money.  These events include
customer and employee meetings, and trade shows.

ENA has made some modifications to the process, which are described in this
memo.

The $5,000 threshold remains in effect for all customer events.  However, the
threshold for approval for employee meetings and events has been lowered to
$2,000, and some additional requirements must be met prior to approval.

Please be sure to follow the procedures described below for all meetings and
events, so we can continue to successfully manage these events.

1) Prior to making any commitments to customers or vendors, all customer
events with anticipated costs in excess of $5,000, and all employee events
with anticipated costs in excess of $2,000 must be reviewed by the ENA Public
Relations (PR) department and approved by the ENA Office of the Chairman

2) The PR department will handle the site search and hotel contract
negotiations for all such events.  Once this is completed, the PR department
will work with you to plan and produce your event in its entirety; or they
can provide as much or as little assistance as you require. The PR department
will be responsible for helping you achieve the best value for your program
and ENA.

3) A completed expenditure request form (see attached) and supporting
documentation is required for each event.  Employee meetings require a
detailed agenda as part of the event documentation prior to approval.  Please
submit the completed expenditure request form and documentation to the PR
department at EB 3642, or work with PR department employees to complete the
form.

4) After PR review, the expenditure will be submitted to the ENA Office of
the Chairman for final approval.

Additionally, the PR department can assist in the procurement of tickets for
various local sporting events and concerts.

If you have any questions regarding this process, would like assistance
planning an event, or need tickets for a Houston event, please contact Dorie
Hitchcock in the PR department at (713) 853-6978.

Thank you for your cooperation.


It doen't matter to me.

Matthew Lenhart@ECT
03/30/2000 11:28 AM
To: "Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> @ ENRON
cc: "'Matthew Lenhart'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>@ENRON, Chad Landry
<Chad.Landry@enron.com>@ENRON, Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>@ENRON, Timothy
Blanchard <Timothy.Blanchard@enron.com>@ENRON
Subject: RE: Cruise!

if we do it then we need to pay by monday.  if everyone has the money i am
cool with the 18th-25th


yes


NESA / HEA will be a Sponsor of the Ziff Energy Group Gas Storage Conference
being held in Houston, Texas on June 22, 2001.  Please take a moment to
review the attached information and contact Shelley Soles - Conference
Director, Ziff Energy Group, at (403) 234-4285 with questions.

 <<Email Broadcast #1.doc>>

 - Email Broadcast #1.doc


Thanks!!!!!

   Kate Symes                12/14/2000 06:06 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal # 476147

I talked to Diana Scholtes last night about this deal, and she looked at it
this afternoon. She says the deal is definitely not entered correctly, but
because it was done for the days when we got hit with transmission cuts, she
wants to look into it a little further before she changes or kills it. She
said she'd reconcile it tomorrow, and we'll let you know what we've done then.

Thanks for your patience,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/13/2000 04:40 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal # 476147

Hello, I think that deal # 476147 might should have been entered as a buy
resale instead of as transmission.  There are not any other transmission
deals in the system with this counterparty.  If you would not mind looking
into this and letting me know I would appreciate it.

Thanks!
Melissa
3-1886


Good morning Larry!  I just spoke to Tom P. to thank him for the tickets to Rent.  I also want to let you know that I really appreciate you cashing in a favor for me!

Tahnks so much again,
Becky

P.S. NYC is great, as you probably know the weather is a bit colder now and it feels great!


If I understand correctly, the scheduled volume is continually higher than the flow?  Why don't
	we allocate this point to minimize the imbalance?  Just a thought?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:39 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	Devon SFS

Who is the marketer assigned to Devon SFS Operating?

Devon owed TW $161,292.49 as of 12/31/01 related to oba contract 21749.  There is one point on this contract(Bilbrey 28 Fed 1) which flows about 500 mmbtu per day.  Devon is currently having problems delivering gas into TW which is increasing the imbalance further.

Devon has told Amy that they will possibly cash out but they haven't made a commitment yet.  If Devon doesn't cash out and they do not lower nominations on this point, then we will have to explore other options to get this gas/$$$$.

Amy will continue to follow up with Devon and pursue cashing out.

thanks
Richard


Ken,

I may miss this meeting. Go ahead with the meeting anyway. I shall join you
in progress. Christie is coming
at 1:30 to meet the students and talk to me. I can talk to her for a few
minutes and then
we can meet the team around 2:00.

Vince

Kenneth Parkhill@ENRON
04/05/2001 05:47 PM
To: "Womack Charles" <cwomack@rice.edu>, "Ronnie Ghosh" <ghoshr@rice.edu>,
"Pravas Sud" <pravas@rice.edu>, "Luigi Calabrese" <luigical@rice.edu>,
"Farhan Iqbal" <iqbal@rice.edu>, <ghosei@rice.edu>
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: meeting with Dan Diamond

fyi
Tomorrow, Friday, at 1:00, I've scheduled a meeting for you with Dan Diamond,
manager of e-commerce in EOL.  Please let me know if this time is bad for
you.  see you tomorrow

ken


458406
bob
should be off peak

458733
chris m
not there deal


due to Conf room conflict (Ken Lay needed our room!).  We'll do it on Tues at 3:30 in 15c1.  We'll update you on the Phoenix meetings last week plus the Desert Crossing project.

let me know if you have questions.
kh


The prebid meeting is tomorrow from 3:00 to 5:00 in ECS 5075.


Hey Phillip,

Can you please have someone flip these deals today?

FT-CENT

Deal No.
Y19194.1
Y21468.1
Y21468.2
Y27138.1
Y27138.2
Y27273.1
Y27725.1
Y47155.1
Y49576.1
Y52758.1
Y52758.2
Y53392.1
Y56668.1
Y58869.1
Y64887.1
Y70216.1
Y72571.1
Y72579.1
Y74345.1
Y75698.1
YD4711.1
YD4711.2
YD4999.1
YD4999.2
YE2067.1
YE2070.1
YE2133.1
YE2134.1
YE4324.1
YE4324.2
YE8508.1
YE8508.2
YE9819.1
YE9819.2
YF0398.1
YF0398.2

Thanks
Stacey


-----Original Message-----
From: Timo Ter?s [mailto:timo@foex.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Cc: tuula@foex.fi
Subject: Re: Foex Index; yr two e-mails

Hi Monika,

Welcome to the pulp and paper world.

In order to understand the index system, the first thing is to look at our
web-site www.foex.fi which includes a lot of information, particularly in
this case the FAQ section. You probably have taken a look at that already,
though.

Our two pulp indexes, NBSKP (Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft) and BHKP
(birch+eucalyptus) cover the European market. As abt 40% of the world pulp
trade is for the European market, these are, in a way, considered to be the
"world market prices", particularly as the third biggest market, North
America (Asia is the second biggest) has virtually the same prices as
Europe; correlation between the two is well over 0.9.

The sellers reporting to us are, by definition, in NBSKP from Canada, US
West Coast and the Nordic countries. BHKP (birch, euca) sellers are from the
Nordic region, Latin America, Spain and Portugal and a number of
Asian/African companies selling Eucalyptus pulp to the European market.
Buyers are European producers of paper and paperboard buying at least some
of their pulp from the open market, representing virtually all countires in
Western Europe. The split between birch and euca is approximately 30%/70%,
again reflecting the actual situation in the European market.

The exact coverage is difficult to calculate as some of the data received
from buyers are from same deals which are reported by the sellers and some
are not. The producers reporting to us represent roughly 80% of the supply
to Europe in the two benchmark grades.

Most (=80-90%) of the pulp sold in Europe is so-called contract business.
This means that a buyer and a seller have an annual or multiannual contract
covering the grades and volumes, quantity rebates etc. However, prices are
fixed also for contract business on a monthly/quarterly basis. Most of the
pulp arriving Continental Europe or UK from abroad, goes through consignment
warehouses (in places like Antwerp, Rotterdam, La Pallice, Tilbury,
Savono-Livorno range etc.). As forwarding companies allow 30-60 days of free
storage, buyers do not hold much inventory at their mills but take the pulp,
delivered by sellers in large shipments, little be little by lorry, rail or
barge. Each delivery is invoiced separately and those invoice prices are the
price reported to us, before customer specific rebates. Prices are for prime
grade pulp and for delivery during the current or latest for the following
month.

The following comments are worth making:
- Our system is based on first taking off top 10% and bottom 10% of the
prices received and only then calculating the index (or rather benchmark)
values. This way we avoid any clerical errors in the data received as well
as any theoretical attempts of manipulation (we have never detected any
attempts)
- We have a more or less equal number of prices received from buyers and
sellers. Some we receive through agents/merchants/trading houses - usually
mandated by a supplier to give us the price data
- If someone does not report their prices on a given week, we can use the
previous week's data but only once
- Prices are not volume-weighted (in order to avoid the manipulation
possibility and unnecessary weekly changes up and down because a supplier
sold one week to large customers and next week to small ones)
- Prices are CIF European port before customer-specific rebates (again to
avoid unnecessary volatility of the index at a time when prices remain
unchanged; also, rebates are often given only afterwards - e.g. when
exceeding a certain tonnage threshhold - and we cannot alter our indexes
retroactively)
- Our index system is approved by financial regulators and by European
Community anti-trust regulators (=DG IV) and audited by
PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
- There is a group of independent experts, case need, as "trouble shooters".
Never have had any and never have received any official complaints about the
index values.
- Participation is totally voluntary
- The main reasons for differences between the often compared FOEX indexes
and Pulpex quotations include:
a) our prices are before customer-specific rebates (averaging 5-6%), Pulpex
prices are net
b) our prices are for contract business, Pulpex prices represent the lowest
spot-levels in a weak market and highest spots in a strong market
c) our price info is based on actual sales, Pulpex prices are expectations
what the spot price might be in e.g. 3 month's time
d) our price is for a prime quality (within each benchmark grade there are
surprisingly large differences between individual mill grades sold) approved
by a seller from a particular supplier/mill, whilst Pulpex prices, based on
a delivery concept (i.e. you do not accept the price offered to close a
contract, you can make/take delivery), are prices in a particular inventory
location (3-4 alternative ones), sometimes far away from buyer's or seller's
normal ports for any lot (often unknown/unwanted grade, up to 11 months and
29 days old goods). This system tends to emphasize in the Pulpex system the
extreme prices, up or down, particularly in these early stages with low
liquidity.
- Our indexes are trade-marked products. Therefore their use for any
commercial purposes is possible only with our permission. To get that
permission, users pay us a small premium, the main source of our income.
Enron and FOEX Indexes Ltd. have a contract, Bob Crane has the details at
your end.

I trust this is helpful. I encourage you to contact us anew for any
additional questions.

Please find enclosed, for order's sake our pulp specs, some additional
comments we send to the price providers and the historical price series you
asked for (historical series are still without today's indexes, to be
published about an hour from sending this message; you can add those from
our web-site by the time you read this).

My best regards to you as well as to David and Elizabeth.

Timo Teras

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika <Monika.Causholli@ENRON.com>
To: timo.teras@poyry.fi <timo.teras@poyry.fi>
Cc: timo.teras@foex.fi <timo.teras@foex.fi>
Date: 23. hein?kuuta 2001 11:43
Subject: Foex Index

Hello Mr. Teras,

My name is Monika Causholli and I am a new analyst working at Enron
Industrial Markets concentrating in pulp. I work with David Allan and
Elizabeth Hutchinson whom you met in the conference in Las Vegas.

I am in the process of understanding the pulp market and how it works.
Right now I am working on a project where I have to analyze the FOEX
index and the methodology behind it. I have seen one of the
presentations that you have presented in the States a while ago but I am
looking for a little bit more detail. For example, what kind of
companies you contact, what percentage of industry they represent in
terms of tonnage, markets that they represent, what geographic area
these companies represent and anything else that you think its important
to know.

I would very much appreciate your help in the matter,

sincerely,
MOnika Causholli


Nigeria - Lagos State Project Phase II Signing (created by John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 8/22/2000)


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 09/13/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------

To: "'Scott Sanders'" <ssanders@mtsqh.com>, "'Besch'" <m_besch@yahoo.com>,
"'Carson'" <Mike.Carson@enron.com>, "'Gretchen Cordill'"
<Gretchen_Cordill@mail.amsinc.com>
cc:
bcc:

Subject: NU joke

> A Kansas State Wildcat fan used to amuse
> himself by scaring every
> >  >  Nebraska fan he would see strutting down the side of the road in
their
> >  >  obnoxious red and white colors. He would swerve his van as if to hit
> >  >  them, and then he would swerve back on the road just before hitting
> >  > them.
> >  >
> >  >  One day, as the van driver was driving along, he saw a priest. He
> >  >  thought he would do a good deed and pulled the van over. He asked
the
> >  >  priest, "Where are you going, Father?" "I'm going to give Mass at
St.
> >  >  Joseph's  Church, about five miles down the road," replied the
priest.
> >  >
> >  >  "No problem, Father! I'll give you a lift. Climb in!" The priest
> >  > climbed
> >  >   into the passenger seat, and the van continued down the road.
> >  > Suddenly,
> >  >  the driver saw a Nebraska fan strutting down the road, and
> >  > instinctively,
> >  >  he swerved as if to hit him. But, as usual, just in time, he swerved
> >  > back
> >  >  to the road, narrowly missing the guy.
> >  >
> >  >  Even though he was certain he missed the guy, he still heard a loud
> >  >  "THUD." Not understanding where the noise came from, he glanced in
> >  >  his mirrors, but he didn't see anything.
> >  >
> >  >  He then remembered the priest, and he turned to the priest and
> >  >  said, "I'm sorry, Father. I almost hit that Nebraska fan." "That's
> >  >  OK,"  replied the priest. "I got him with the door."


Altered it so that your list was correct, or altered it via instructions to HR?

i.e. Is the list you gave me correct for Bob?

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Forster, David
Subject:	RE: Bonus Question

I altered it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 6:53 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Bonus Question

Bob was shown at 150 on the HR list, which did not agree with what was on the list you gave me.

I am going with what was on the list you gave me. Please confirm you did not intend otherwise.

Thanks,

Dave


NYMEX Membership Services
May 1, 2001
Notice # MS-30

REINSTATEMENT OF MEMBERSHIP PRIVILEGES

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 1, 2001, the
following member(s) have reinstated their membership privileges:

Peter Sepe (SEPE-3496) as a Lessee Member with a qualified trader guarantee
provided by MBF Clearing Corp.

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 1, 2001, the
following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

Michael Frenda (MFR-6272)

Randy Rechten (RDEL-4287)

Robert Essig (STX-3371)

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SWITCH QUALIFYING CLEARING MEMBER

 Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 1, 2001,
Man International Inc., will no longer guarantee the following member(s):

Stephen P. Willner (SPW-247)

James Sims (JMS-7307)

 However, the above mentioned will remain a member guaranteed by Pioneer
Futures, Inc.  In connection therewith, notification of any claims against
the aforementioned individuals arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business May 1, 2001, must be submitted to the
Corporate Secretary,s Office within (10) ten days.

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department at 212-299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-30)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Sorry, it was on the slow boat, in interroffice mail back from Steve, I just
got it.  I'll fax a copy back to the company today and follow with an
original by fedex this everning.

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 10:38 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDAs for Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline co

Thanks.  Can you mail me when you get it?  If I don't hear from you by end of
week, I'll call Steve.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Philipson, Fred
Subject: Re: NDAs for Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline co

No, I have not received the fully executed document yet from Steve.

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate 05/29/2001 09:14 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: NDAs for Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline co

Tana,

Just a follow up.  Did you happen to receive the above from Steve Hotte of
ETS?  If so, has a copy been forwarded to Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline co?


Notice # 01-390
November 19, 2001

TRANSPORTATION UPDATE

SHUTTLE SERVICE

Effective Wednesday, November 21, 2002, the two vans running from One North
End Avenue to the Staten Island Ferry and the Bowling Green area have been
cancelled.

The Battery Park City Authority (B.P.C.A.) is running free shuttle buses
Southbound leaving Chambers Street and Northbound leaving Bowling Green.
Information on these shuttle buses have been posted in the lobby and near
the elevators in the building.

The hours of operation are as follows:

Southbound Leaving Chambers Street		Northbound Leaving Bowling
Green
Weekdays	6:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m.		6:14 a.m. - 11:14 p.m.
Saturday	7:00 a.m. - Midnight		7:14 a.m. - 12:15 a.m.
Sunday	7:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m.		7:14 a.m. - 11:14 p.m.

These shuttle buses effectively replicate the coverage provided by the vans.


I left a check in the top drawer (the one with the key)

Kay


Mitch - DeDe and I are each arriving the prior night, so we can begin  early. I have not heard back from others as to when their plances arrive, so I  suggested 10:30 in my original e-mail on this.  But subject to plane  schedules, the earlier the better.

If I remember correctly, AEP uses business casual dress. Is that  appropriate for this meeting?  Your call, Mitch.

It would be helpful if attendees advise me or my assistant of the names and  e-mails of the perions you are bringing with, so we have a good talley of the  attendees and can contact them, if necessary.
Ed
>>> <fmdutton@aep.com> 11/20/01 11:06AM  >>>
Recipients
Noel Trask inquired when is the December 6  meeting supposed to start and
end and whether we ask business people familiar  with the MISO rules to also
attend -- maybe allow each company to
bring  one person if they want to?
I think it is important that we all agree how  to proceed so, please advise
how all of you would like to proceed.
F.  Mitchell Dutton
Senior Counsel
Wholesale & Energy Services
American  Electric Power
audionet 205.4568
614.223.1605
Fax  614.324.5096
Cellular 614.203.7861


Set up w/Patti Thompson x-39106


As Mike and I look across all of our business units, we continue to look for
optimal organizational structures that will enable each business unit to
achieve it's targets for  2001 and beyond.  In our weather business, there
appears to be a lack of seamlessness.  Reporting relationships, P&L, and
vision for this business are not best alligned as this business exists
today.

Mike and I would like to address this as follows:  all employees in the
weather business will now become full time employees of EGM and report to
Mark Tawney.  We need 100% full time dedication from each of these employees
in the weather business.  Accordingly Mark and I will be looking at, with
each of you, the employees that may be affected by this transition.  It is
important that both business units work together to determine which
individuals will be in Weather, or  will be in EEL.  Once done, Mark will
begin adding to the weather team in each of your regions.   It is obvious
that the organizations and product lines can lever each other and the
synergies will provide powerful results in our regional gas and power
businesses in particular.

If you look at coal, lng, equities, etc, we have employees based in each of
your regions who report back into the appropriate business unit within EGM.
This restructure will similarly align weather.


Hi Heather, Jeff and Ozzie,

The only issue I have with the testimony is the statement that the units are
"extremely quiet".  At this point FCE will only guaranty 60dba, which some
folks might not consider to be extremely quiet depending on how close a
facility is to their house.  You may have determined that the noise level
will be some number less than 60 dba so that the guaranty level does not
reflect the expected noise level.

Kay


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011501.txt


Sevil,

As I stated to you yesterday, I am extremely sorry for causing so much confusion over the non-existent compensation concern.  I would like to reassure you though that there are no problems or concerns, and that I was just letting my mind get ahead of me, and was mixing different thought processes and projects.  Unfortunately, you had to reap the repercussions of my brain malfunction.   I hope that you accept my apology, and can rest with an easy mind.

Anne


Yes  Chris...we did administer a frequent flyer, V.I.P. program for them, but they  cancelled the contract with us when a "rouge" hued young man scrapped his pink,  sun burnt nose on the seat in front of him whilst flying through some  turbulence.  The giant scab resulted in several plastic surgeries and never  really healed.  Their insurance premiums went through the roof and as a  result, they cancelled our program.

I am  now working on a program for Canada 3000 - 1 free chiropractic adjustment  for every 15 minutes of flying time - hoping to close this one  soon!

Just  an FYI...
-----Original Message-----
From: chris mcconvey  [mailto:chrismcconvey@on.aibn.com]
Sent: May 25, 2001 9:48  AM
To: Joseph G.Galea
Cc: mvanrassel@rpmtec.com;  mitchmilestone@home.com; Charles Jones; jonch@magic.pmh.on.ca; James Galea;  James McDonnell; John.J.Lavorato@enron.com; Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com;  Mark Wilson; Fehler, Mary (JUS); Evelyn Galea; Brad Hall; DARREN  TRELOAR
Subject: Re:
Joe - great news -  ........forgot to ask you how the Aeroflot (sp?) service was on your first  trip over.  Is it true the Matthew Scott Company is doing some  promotional/incentive partner programs with them ....led by  MMMMMMMMAACCCKKKKERRR!!!!
Joseph G.Galea wrote:    Diane and I are thrilled to announce that we  will be travelling to Russia for the 2nd and final time (for a few years  anyway) to pick up our son, Yanic! We will be leaving on Friday June 15th,  with our court appearance on June 19 and our flight home to Toronto on  June 22! Thanks to all for your kind words and sentiments over the last few  months. REGARDS,  Joseph Galea
McGown  Intermac Inc.
160 Bloor  Street East
Suite #  1124
Toronto, Ontario   M4W 1B9
Ph. #  416-966-1622
Fax. #  416-966-1434


Pithy.

Alan Comnes
12/27/2000 09:23 AM
To: mhain@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Governor Davis letter

Mary,

This is what got sent finally.  Not much like the orginal letter ....

---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 12/27/2000 09:22
AM ---------------------------

Ginger Dernehl@ENRON
12/27/2000 07:32 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Governor Davis letter

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 09:32 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/27/2000 08:52 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis letter

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 08:52 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/21/2000 03:11 PM

		 To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis letter

Here you go.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000 03:11 PM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/20/2000 01:00 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis letter

FYI

Ken Lay faxed this letter to Gov. Davis today.

If I left anyone off the list, please for this to them.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/20/2000 12:56 PM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	12/20/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis letter


I hear Oz will be there, too.  How fun!

From: Claudette Harvey/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 03:50 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

i do, i do.......it just wouldn't be the same without ya!

smile

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:47 PM
To: Harvey, Claudette
Subject: Re: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

if you insist...

From: Claudette Harvey/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 03:35 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

why don't you come?

claude

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:43 PM
To: Lalji, Farouk
Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......
Importance: High

here you go.......

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Gardner, Stephanie
Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......
Importance: High

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Yzaguirre, Max; Duffy, Matthew; Sabine, Marc; Helton, Susan; Vu, Nancy
H.; Ogden, Mary; Rimbau, Robert W.; Cavazos, Manuel; Ramirez, Garibaldis;
McCaig, Duncan; Tingleaf, Drew; Ahn, Chris; Curry, Mike; Jester, Larry;
Cross, Edith; Rode, Tina; Harvey, Claudette; Martinez, Judy; Parks, Michelle;
Gordon, Joe; Pagan, Ozzie; Butler, Monica; Rodriguez, Cecilia; Olvera,
Paulita; Blanch Lopez; Maldonado, Marianella; Moore, John; Gimble, Mathew;
Johnston, Elizabeth; Wang, Steve; Nall, Leslie; Coleman, Mike; Spiller,
Brent; Harris, Charles; Black, Tamara Jae; Suarez, Juan; Brown, Michael;
Kroll, Heather; 'jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com'; 'ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com';
Chapman, Christy; Celedon, Adriana; Celedon-Renovato, Esther; Moreno, Douglas
V.; Mena, Luis; Baldwin, Sherri; Roberts, Chaun; Dean, Clint; Mouton, Stacie;
Stewart, Jennifer N.; Holcombe, Tina ; Garberding, Michael; Gilbert-smith,
Doug; Irvin, Steve; Ballato, Russell; 'philly2323@hotmail.com';
'bruce.sukaly@cinergy.com'; 'david.livingston@cinergy.com'; Anderson, Kristi;
Dutta, Tom; Kuykendall, Kevin; Roberts, Chaun; Thompkins, Jason
Subject: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

Please be advised all information submitted herein is prepared solely to make
you smile, is not so confidential and should be shown to or discussed with
any third party.  The information submitted herein is not, or intended to be,
offensive in any way. To some the content of this email may be duty
hindering, and just may cause you to blow off working the rest of the day.
Regarding the following, no binding agreements will arise until everyone is
convincingly inebriated. Certainly all invitees mutually accept this
definitive agreement, containing mutually agreeable provisions, including,
but not limited to, those relating to fun, fun, and more fun.......I consider
the structures herein obligatory, and that you will be compelled to
definitely dig it.......you have been warned

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

I would like to personally invite all of you to join us in saying Farewell,
Adios, Bidaya, Ciao, Peace
out man,....Goodbye, to Stephanie Gardner.  As some of you are already know ,
Stephanie is leaving Enron to pursue a position at  Cinergy working under
Bruce Sukaly.  Her last day is tomorrow, June 1, and although it just kills
us to see
you go Steffy, we don't mind kickin' you out in style. (smile)  Please join
me in congratulating Stephanie, and wishing
her nothing but the best in the future.  Let's make sure she doesn't forget
us too soon.....And what better way to do that than.......you know it,
baby.......HAPPY HOUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
   When?: Friday, 6/1/01
     5:30 pm - until they throw us out

   Where?: Slainte Irish Pub
     509 Main St.

   Why?: Because We Love You, Steffy!!!!

Hope to see y'all there,
claude


Sure Sue has filled you in, but just to be certain, my understanding is that
Dan Douglas, attorney for WPTF, is going to meet with the AG (not sure when)
in an attempt to narrow the scope of the subpoena.  Dan also plans to begin
drafting responses to the subpeona.  Since we are a member of WPTF and
therefore presumably covered by the subpoena, seems important that our
attorney's coordinate with Dan.  Sue, if I've mangled anything, let me know.

Best,
Jeff


Have you had a chance to look at the"Letter in Lieu" for conveyance?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Ernsthaft, William" <William.Ernsthaft@nypa.gov>
	10/09/2000 07:44 AM

		 To: "'tana.jones@enron.com'" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed NYPA Opinion

Tana, attached is the Authority's proposed opinion. We would be expecting a
comparable opinion from Enron. Bill

 <<SWAPOP3.DOC>>

 - SWAPOP3.DOC


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ordway, Chris
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Boudreaux, Shanna; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Townsend,
Judy; Versen, Victoria
Subject: FW: TE Critical System Warning

FYI...

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: infopost@duke-energy.com [mailto:infopost@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:00 AM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Critical System Warning

November 26, 2001

As indicated by the Critical System Warning issued November 25, 2001,
based on anticipated system operations and weather conditions, as stated
below, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (Texas Eastern) is requiring that
all customers take immediate and prompt steps to eliminate excess
receipts and conform scheduled receipts to actual deliveries. This
system-wide warning is issued as a result of actual receipts into the
system significantly exceeding actual deliveries. This Critical System
Warning shall remain in place until further notice.

Weather in the market area continues to be unseasonably mild and
shippers have been filling contract storage inventories in anticipation
of the coming winter heating season.  At this time, Texas Eastern's
storage capacity is approximately 98% full.  As a result, there is
virtually no storage capacity or linepack available for system
operational purposes and Texas Eastern cannot continue to absorb actual
imbalances left on the system.

Because of the critical nature of this situation and the fact that Texas
Eastern no longer has the ability to further absorb imbalances being
left on the system, Texas Eastern requests that all customers coordinate
with their suppliers the actual quantities received into the system to
match actual customer takes in the market area.  No due pipe gas will be
accepted into the system until further notice.

If immediate action does not result in reducing the current volume of
gas being left on the system, Texas Eastern may be forced to issue an
operational flow order ("OFO") requiring actual receipts of gas to match
actual deliveries out of the system, which will be subject to the OFO
non-compliance penalty of $25 per dekatherm.  In addition and as
provided for in Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Texas Eastern will take
any other actions as may be necessary to protect the integrity of its
system, including, but not limited to, suspension of OBA's.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042306.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


A few changes have been made to the Second Quarter schedule.  Please let me
know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-6021

Monday, July 24
 Release Earnings
 Depart for New York (approx. 5:00 p.m.)

Tuesday, July 25 - New York
 Analyst Meetings
 Depart for Boston (approx. 6:00 p.m.)

Wednesday, July 26 - Boston
 Analyst Meetings
 Depart for Houston (approx. 5:00 p.m.)

Friday, July 28 - Houston
 8:00 a.m. Analyst Meeting


Can't be.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Jay
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:38 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	8:30 am trade counts

Off to a weak start.  Only last Wednesday had a lower trade count by 8:30 am.

TRADE DATE	NA GAS	NA POWER	TOTAL TRADE CNT
11/26/2001	781	372	1680
11/25/2001	4	1	5
11/24/2001	13	2	15
11/23/2001	1	17	257
11/22/2001	11	8	236
11/21/2001	949	333	1576
11/20/2001	992	290	1720
11/19/2001	825	508	1968
11/18/2001	6	4	10
11/17/2001	10	6	16
11/16/2001	880	583	2203
11/15/2001	1006	523	2199
11/14/2001	731	444	2364
11/13/2001	868	527	1951
11/12/2001	878	380	1913
11/11/2001	7	2	9
11/10/2001	5	8	13
11/9/2001	615	444	1679
11/8/2001	975	489	1931
11/7/2001	877	727	2288
11/6/2001	1064	849	2463
11/5/2001	930	839	2308
11/4/2001	4	3	7
11/3/2001	2	16	18
11/2/2001	1211	576	2253
11/1/2001	984	769	2429


I've left a message for Stewart Rosman, the mid-marketer who did this deal,
to find out whether or not he wants this confirmed. Diana Scholtes said she
thought he did, in which case I need to determine with him what kind of deal
this should be, and we'd need to confirm the first leg. I'll let you know as
soon as I hear back from him.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/26/2001 03:08 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 565226

There is a leg 2 for this deal that has come up on the list to be confirmed.
We did not confirm leg 1 of this deal and I don't think we confirm
buy/resales as they are like transmission.  Could check into this and let me
know.

Thanks!


Thanks


Fati,

Please contact Krishnarao Pinnamaneni or
Osman Sezgen.

Vince

Fatimata Liamidi@EES
03/14/2001 03:45 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Research Tip

Hello Vince:

My name is Fati Liamidi.  I work as an Associate in the URM group in EES.
I have come up with an value proposition which I think could make sense for
my group and wanted to run it by one of your colleagues to see if they could
help me out in terms of pricing.
Would you mind directing me toward somebody in your group who would be
willing to talk to me?  The idea involves options.

Thanks you very much in advance.

Fati Liamidi
3-4563


fyi,

Mat

---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Smith/NA/Enron on 03/26/2001 07:15 AM ---------------------------
From:	Lowell Bezanis/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 04:51 PM
To:	Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Courtney Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, George Thomas/ENRON@enronXgate, Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron@Enron, Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	LNG Team update


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Please find attached the captioned report for the week ending May 18.  PLEASE
NOTE THAT I HAVE ADDED BPA ITEMS THAT MIGHT BE OF INTEREST TO YOU.  A topic /
key word index follows below, in order to facilitate coming up to date on
topics of interest to you.  If you wish to add or delete names from the
distribution, please advise.   Should you have any question on any of the
items, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Thanks.  Ray

BPA short-term policy to encourage the use of small electric generation.

The Bonneville Power Administration hopes to establish a short-term policy to
encourage the use of small electric generation to help the Northwest meet its
needs during the current energy shortage. Before implementing the policy in
June, BPA wants to hear from the public on the details of the plan. The
policy will encourage the immediate addition of electricity generation to
help the region until planned long-term generation can be built. While BPA
will not fund the construction of the generators nor buy the output, the
policy complements the load reduction strategy BPA has with its customers.
Customers who reduce their load on BPA by 10 percent would be allowed to use
temporary small generators to supply a small portion of their needs. BPA has
asked its customers to reduce their demands on BPA so BPA can avoid expensive
large power purchases in the wholesale market. Such purchases could lead to a
triple-digit wholesale rate increase this October. The use of the small
generators, along with other actions such as energy conservation, can help
decrease reliance on BPA and thus help keep rates down. The generation plants
would have to meet all applicable local, state and national regulations. The
temporary policy would apply from June 1, 2001, through Sept. 30, 2002.

Clarification: 29,35
Cogeneration: 10,11
Complaint: 8,24
Compliance: 16
Creditworthiness: 6
Denial of rehearing: A,4,9
Financial: 8,9
Interconnect Agreement: C,D,1,34
Merger: 7
Operating Agreement: D,1
PGE: 23,26
Power Sale Agreement: 12,32,34
Power Sale Tariff: 11,15,22
QF's: 29
Refunds: 27
RTO: 19
Transmission Service Agreement: B,E,13,17,21, 30,31,33
Transmission Tariff: C,2,3,5,14,20,24,25
Underscheduling penalty: 5,6


Buy 150 December 2001 NYMEX contracts @ $2.535
Sell 150 December 2001 NYMEX Contracts @ $2.65
Buy 150 December 2001 NYMEX Contracts @ $2.316

Monthly P/L is $671,000.  Nice trading!  Now could you loan it back to Enron, or maybe I should say I hope you can collect!


I wanted to update you on my conversation this morning with Mark Lindsay
regarding next week,s budget meeting.

The format will be similar to last year,s.  We,ll be receiving from Mark,s
group a consolidated spreadsheet of all of our budgets, grouping them by
functionality and illustrating 2000 plan, 2000 estimate, and 2001 plan, and
the variances between.  We will be covering the EPSC and Aviation budgets
during the same meeting.  Billie and I will get together on Friday to compare
what the two of us have so far, and then we have a meeting set up for Monday
morning with you, Bill, Billie and me to go over everything in advance of
Tuesday,s meeting.

Points that Mark made (no surprises here):
-  Jeff has mentioned that he wants to see reductions in all corporate cost
centers since our international activities look like they,re going away.  (We
have made significant reductions year to year on our international gov,t
affairs and PR budgets, and I think we can justify that the other cost
centers are primarily focused on domestic activities while the individual
business units budget much of those activities themselves.)
-  Even though we,re allocating more overall to the business units this year,
Jeff will be interested in the gross budget numbers, before any allocations.
-  We need to be able to explain any significant budget changes year to year
 -  Mark particularly emphasized the increase in the PR budget, most of which
is retained at Corp anyway
 -  We need to be able to explain anything that we,ve inherited from the
business units that is now staying at Corp.  This  applies to the headcount
that we,ve picked up from ENA and from Int,l (Dennis, group).

Lindsay mentioned that there,s a possibility that Causey may, in advance of
our Tuesday meeting, meet by himself with Skilling to get a general idea of
where Jeff stands on the corporate budgets as they,ve been submitted so far,
and then come back to us with instructions on any changes that need to be
made.  If this is the case, we may have to make cuts before we get to present
our case.

I'm working on our presentation based on that conversation and will forward
it to you as it progresses.


EOL Deals	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/24/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/24/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 426	 8,453,725	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 91	 4,097,605
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 315	 4,988,400	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 361	 12,962,882
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 394	 6,258,080	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 219	 14,633,520
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 1,922	 1,372,712	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 569	 1,391,402
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 999	 718,400	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 490	 467,551
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 1,538	 1,215,000	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 758	 2,174,522
 	 Real Time	 907	 22,750	  	 Real Time	 556	 61,513

 	 Grand Total	 6,501	 23,029,067	  	 Grand Total	 3,044	 35,788,995

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 09/24/2001   To: 09/24/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 09/24/2001   To: 09/24/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 63	 1,706,000	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 7	 69,273
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 43	 594,400	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 38	 2,511,218
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 43	 653,575	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 42	 2,301,625
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 141	 117,520	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 28	 47,872
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 75	 28,800	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 26	 16,668
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 109	 43,600	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 43	 43,493
 	 Real Time	 77	 1,925	  	 Real Time	 35	 4,293

 	 Grand Total	 551	 3,145,820	  	 Grand Total	 219	 4,994,442

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 09/24/2001   To: 09/24/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 800	 0	  $       16.48
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $       19.25
 	 Mid C (OP, Oct-01)	 7,825	 0	  $       20.50
 	 Mid C (P, Oct-01)	 21,600	 10,800	  $       24.90
 	 Mid C (P, Nov-01)	 60,000	 0	  $       31.18
 	 Mid C (OP, Dec-01)	 17,200	 8,600	  $       28.05
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 100,000	 10,000	  $       38.10
 	 Mid C (P, Jan-02)	 52,000	 0	  $       36.85
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 600	 0	  $       18.70
 	 NP-15 (OP, Oct-01)	 7,825	 7,825	  $       20.10
 	 NP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 30,000	 10,000	  $       31.83
 	 NP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 10,000	 0	  $       37.25
 	 NP-15 (OP, Q1 02)	 23,600	 0	  $       25.00
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 200	 0	  $       15.80
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 3,200	 0	  $       25.14
 	 Palo (P, Bal Month)	 3,200	 3,200	  $       24.75
 	 Palo (P, Oct-01)	 108,000	 0	  $       25.86
 	 Palo (P, Nov-01)	 60,000	 0	  $       26.29
 	 Palo (P, Dec-01)	 60,000	 0	  $       31.58
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 0	  $       30.50
 	 Palo (P, Q2 02)	 30,800	 0	  $       34.75
 	 Palo (P, Q3 02)	 61,600	 30,800	  $       50.38
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 200	 0	  $       17.05
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 6,000	 400	  $       22.88
 	 SP-15 (P, Oct-01)	 75,600	 10,800	  $       25.53
 	 SP-15 (OP, Oct-01)	 15,650	 0	  $       19.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 10,000	 0	  $       29.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 20,000	 0	  $       33.88
 	 SP-15 (P, Q2 02)	 30,800	 0	  $       33.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Q3 02)	 61,600	 30,800	  $       46.18
 	 SP-15 (P, Q4 02)	 30,800	 0	  $       35.00
 	 SP-15 (P, Q3 03)	 30,800	 0	  $       51.00
 	 SP-15 (P, Cal 03)	 368,400	 245,600	  $       39.28

 	 Grand Total	 1,319,100	 368,825	  $     966.54


Hey,

I just figures something out.  The only email messages that you are getting, from me, are the ones where I am replying to you.  This is due to I had your email address as shannontyer@msn.net, however, I noticed that your return email address is shannontyer@email.msn.com.

We are about to transition to UBS Warburg, hopefully next week.  The whole thing is a pain in the ass, but, I think that it will have very lucrative returns in the future!

So what's been goin' on?  You never returned my call last week.  How's the B&B project?  I heard supper with R & S & R & M went well, except for you having some G.I. problems.  Drop me a line or call if you want to catch a movie or grab  supper some time.

Take care,

Don


Well, I do believe this makes 450!  A nice round number if I do say so myself!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 05:34 PM -----

	Susan Bailey
	09/19/2000 05:30 PM

		 To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, James L
Copeland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Wilhite/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arizona Public Service Company

We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   September 8, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Arizona Public Service Company

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Weather
          Foreign Exchange
          Pulp & Paper

Special Note:  The Counterparty has three (3) Local Business Days after the
receipt of a Confirmation from ENA to accept or dispute the Confirmation.
Also, ENA is the Calculation Agent unless it should become a Defaulting
Party, in which case the Counterparty shall be the Calculation Agent.

Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


As soon as I get my grades (which I hope will be mid-late December), I'll send them to Ginger in the attempt to get tuition reimbursed.  But don't worry, I have extremely low expectations about the likelihood of getting reimbursed.  This plan make sense?

Best,
Jeff


?

Rushing Game Matchups???  Here's how I see  the matchups this week.? Please
note, see the cheatsheet online http://www.cheatsheets.net/week15sheet.htm?
for exactly where I rank players and to  determine who to start.? Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily  mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.? The matchup
info is meant to be just one  more tool in your box when it comes to deciding
between players.??

Locks:? These games heavily  favor the Offense

Stephen Davis  (Was) vs Cowboy Defense??  New Coach Terry  Robiskie,s been
saying he,ll run Davis into the ground.? Against a run defense as soft as
the  Cowboy,s, no telling how many yards he,ll gain.? The arm seems ok and I
look for a huge  game here.? RBs roll up 200 yards on  Dallas like it,s an
average day(

Darnell Autry /  Chris Warren (Phi) vs Brown Defense??? It remains to be seen
what  effect (if any) newly signed Chris Warren will have this week.? It
wouldn,t surprise me a bit if Andy  Reid isn,t able to come up with at least
a small package of plays that feature  Warren.? He,s a thousand times  better
than Darnell Autry.? If he  can,t go this week, I,d look for him to be a
factor next week for sure.?? The Browns defense ranks # 30 in  rushing yards
allowed per game over the last four weeks so the matchup is  enticing.

Fred Taylor (Jac)  vs Cardinal Defense?? Every once in a while, those &too
good to be true8 matchups don,t pan out.?  This is certainly one of those
&too good to be true8 situations but I,d  be shocked if Taylor doesn,t just
roll over the Cards.? They can,t stop the run even when they  know what,s
coming at them.? Arizona  ranks # 29 in rushing yards allowed per game over
the last month.? That number won,t go down any after this  week.

Mike Anderson  (Den) vs Seahawk Defense?? Starting any player facing the
Seahawks is not a bad rule of thumb.?  They,ve been pretty bad and this week
they don,t stand a chance against  the dominating OL of Denver.?  Anderson
practiced fully Thursday so he looks good to go.? Keep an eye on the weather
as they,re  expecting snow in Denver but I,m not too worried about how it,ll
effect  Anderson.

Ron Dayne (NYG) vs  Steeler Defense?? This was the type of game they  drafted
Dayne for.? A ground war vs  Pittsburgh in December.? It,s not  likely the
Steelers will jump to a big lead and force the Giants to catchup mode  which
means pretty much no Dayne.?  This is shaping up to be a classic battle with
Bettis on one side and  Warren on the other.

?

Prime Matchups:? These games favor the  Offense?

Sammy Morris  / Shawn Bryson (Buf) vs Colts Defense??  Keep an eye on who can
go for the Bills this week but whoever starts will  likely have some good
rushing numbers on the carpet in Indiana.? There were some semi encouraging
signs  that Morris might be back. The Colts rank just # 25 over the last 4
weeks  in rushing yards allowed  per game.? They,re  soft on the run and
someone could make a big splash on Monday  Night.?

Charlie  Garner (SF) vs Saints Defense?? Just as they are with their pass
defense, the Saints rush defense is overrated.? Over the last four weeks,
they rank # 23  in rushing yards allowed  per game.? And  Garner is liable to
explode at any time.?  He,s too good in both the rushing and passing game to
consider sitting  down unless you,re just loaded.?

Warrick Dunn  (TB) vs Miami Defense?? It was surprising to me to see the
Dolphins slide this far on rush defense.?  Over the last four weeks, they
rank # 23 in rushing yards allowed per  game.? Doesn,t seem  right but that,s
what the numbers say.?  Either way, Dunn,s a must start given what he,s done
lately.?

Robert Smith  (Min) vs Ram Defense?? Like the passing defense, the Rams  rush
defense has improved over the year.?  It doesn,t matter though.?  You,ve got
to start Robert Smith.?  End of story.? He may be the  best RB in the league
if truth be told.???

Emmitt Smith  (Dal) vs Redskin Defense?? I think I may be the only one who
sees it this way, but I believe the Chris Warren booting was a real
statement  for Smith.? Sure, he still may not  get the 3rd down carries as
they get a look at Michael Wiley but  Emmitt is pretty much working without a
net here.? He proved his mettle once again last  week hammering against a
tough Tampa team.?  The Cowboys also showed how little faith they have in
their passing game  as they continued to feed Smith the ball even when
trailing badly. Washington  ranks # 21 over the last four weeks in rushing
yards allowed per  game so they,re very beatable.?

Tony  Richardson (KC) vs Panther Defense??  Another week, another RB shakeup
in KC as this time it,s Kimble Anders  who,s out of the mix.? I honestly
have a hard time trusting coach Gunther Cunningham with any of them but it
looks  like Richardson will get the bulk of the work right now.? The Panthers
can be run on.? Keep an eye on the weather in this one  as the passing game
could be limited.

James Allen  (Chi) vs Patriot Defense?? What a mess Chicago finds itself
in.? The messiah QB is now healthy  but still on the bench while the &guru8
offensive coordinator has left (been run  out of?) town for Utah and both
starting WRs are gone for the year with  injuries.? James Allen may be the
bright spot as he,s run hard and effectively.? The New England defense can
be  vulnerable to the run and this may be another week where they rely on
Allen to  carry a heavy load.

?

Even Matchups:? These games  feature no real advantage either way?

Edgerrin James (Ind) vs Bills  Defense??  Edgerrin may be  having one of the
best &poor8 seasons in NFL history.? He,s posting great numbers overall but
you,ll have a hard time finding a James owner who,s real happy with him.? If
he,s your guy, you have very little  choice but to start him in the Monday
Night game.? The Colts are tougher at home and  hopefully they won,t find
themselves playing catchup again.? Although with his receiving ability,  he,s
still active in that situation but it,s not the ideal scenario for any RB
when his team is playing from behind.?  The Bills rank # 18 over the last
four weeks in rushing yards allowed per  game so it,s a pretty average
rushing  defense.?

Tyrone Wheatley (Oak) vs Jets  Defense?? I,ll keep an eye on this one for
you but I,m hearing while the ankles may be better, a broken finger may be
giving him trouble.? Some are  speculating this is the cause of his 2 fumbles
last week.? The Jets play pretty solid rush defense  so it,s truly a matchup
that could go either way.? I,ll try to see what I can find out on  this one.?

Michael Pittman (Ari) vs Jaguar  Defense?? The Pittman injury watch
continues  as he,s still battling turf toe.? He  sat out of practice Thursday
and may not know his status until Friday or  Saturday.? If he can,t go, it
looks  like Clarence Williams could get the start.? If you,re scrambling for
RBs, he,s  likely available in your league.?  Even assuming Pittman can go,
it,s not a great matchup as the Jags have  picked up the level of their play
lately.?

Lamar Smith (Mia) vs Buccaneer Defense??  Don,t let the Buc defense scare
you.? They,re a very good unit but as Emmitt  Smith proved last week, a
determined rusher can fare ok there.? Lamar Smith surely falls under that
&determined8 class.? If he,s your  guy, I,d still go with him.? Tampa  ranks
# 16 over the last four week in rushing yards allowed per game.? They,re
allowing an average of 108 yards  per game over that time so it,s not like
they,re Baltimore (48 yards per game  over their last 3)

?

Curtis Martin (NYJ) vs Raider Defense??  Like Tampa, the Raiders rush defense
has a bark that,s a little worse  than their bite.? They,re solid but  not a
defense that sends RBs running for cover.? They rank # 17 in rushing yards
allowed  per game over the last four weeks.?  Martin looked great last week
and looks to be guy they,re counting on to  carry the offense.?

?

Eddie George (Ten) vs Bengal  Defense?? Most people have this image in  their
heads of the Bengal defense laying down against the run.? Not so.? Over the
last four weeks, only 8 teams  are tougher in allowing rushing yards per
game.? Maybe that,s because teams choose to  pass the ball where Cincinnati
is weak but the bottom line is teams don,t run a  tremendous amount on them.?
However,  if QB Steve McNair is limited with a bad ankle and knee,? you,ll
see a team that runs the ball as  their 1st, 2nd and 3rd option.? (pretty
much their style with a healthy  McNair too()?? George is a must  start even
though it,s no slam dunk on the matchup.

?

James Stewart (Det) vs Packer Defense??  Depending on the weather and Charlie
Batch,s ribs, Stewart could be asked  to carry the load this week.? Green
Bay is hurting on Defense with DT Steve Warren the latest injured Packer on
defense.? On the flip side, they,re  playing pretty stingy rush defense
averaging 104 rushing yards allowed per game  over their last 4 which ranks
them # 14.?

??

?

Downside Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense

Brad Hoover (Car)  vs Chief Defense??  With Tshimanga  Biakabutuka reverting
back to his normal &can,t stay healthy8 form he,s  displayed for most of his
career, Hoover gets another shot this week.? The Chiefs are tough at home and
the  weather could be a factor (possibly in his favor) but Hoover will take
his power  rushing style into Arrowhead and see how he fares.? Kansas City
ranks # 8 over the last four  weeks in rushing yards allowed per game so they,
re pretty  solid.

Travis Prentice /  Jamel White (Cle) vs Eagle Defense?? Neither of these guys
is doing a  great job and they,ll both likely struggle against an Eagle team
that,s serious  about defense.? If it were me, I,d  look elsewhere if these
were my guys.

Marshall Faulk  (Stl) vs Viking Defense?? While they,re under appreciated,
the Viking rush defense is pretty good.?  Over the last four weeks, they rank
# 11 in rushing yards allowed per  game.? They,ll have all they want  with
Marshall Faulk but the defense is one of the tougher one,s Faulk will  face.?
He,s still a no brainer to  start regardless of the opponent.?  He,s
reportedly feeling ok with the knees although he admits to being  worried
about them both.? Coach Mike  Martz has talked about using him on special
teams to help turn that unit  around.

J.R. Redmond /  Patrick Pass / Kevin Faulk (NE) vs Bears Defense??  With
Redmond still ailing, the Patriot RB situation is a mess.? And Bill Belichick
certainly isn,t  shedding much light on anything.?  Unless Redmond shows he
can be 100%, I,d probably shy away from all 3 of  them as it,s too much of a
shot in the dark trying to predict Belichick.? The Bears are playing pretty
tough rush  defense with rookie sensation Brian  Urlacher.

Ahman Green (GB)  vs Lion Defense?? One bright spot for the Packers  this
year has been the outstanding play of Ahman Green.? Coach Mike Holmgren in
Seattle could  have likely saved a # 1 pick on Alexander if Green was still
in Seattle.? Green,s always had the physical skills  but he lagged behind in
other areas.?  Now, he seems to have brought the mental part of the game up
significantly and the results are showing on the field.? It,s a tough matchup
as the Lions rank #  7 over the last four weeks in rushing yards allowed per
game but I think he,s up  for it.

??

Defensive Slam Dunks:? These games heavily favor the  Defense

Ricky  Watters (Sea) vs Bronco Defense?? Denver evidently didn,t take  kindly
to Corey Dillon hanging a Hall of Fame type day on them several weeks ago  as
they,ve been tough against the run since then.? Over the last four weeks,
they rank # 2  in rushing yards allowed  per game allowing just 57 yards per
game.? Watters is a solid player and not unlike  an Emmitt Smith, he,s a guy
that,s made a living performing against the tough  teams in tough games.? So
it,s not  like I,m terrified of this matchup.?  Just be aware, it,s a tough
one.?  One thing you might want to consider is that coach Mike Holmgren has
said  at some point, he wants to see more of rookie Shaun Alexander,
especially in the  passing game.? How much he,d like to  see isn,t known
right now.?

Terrell  Fletcher (SD) vs Baltimore Defense??  Let,s not go there.?
Baltimore is allowing an average of 48 yards rushing per game over their
last 3 games.? I don,t see Fletcher  as the guy who breaks that trend.?

Jerald Moore  / Chad Morton / Terry Allen (NO)? vs  49er Defense??? Early
this week, both Moore  and Morton were injured and feared to possibly miss
Sunday,s game.? They appear to be healing ahead of  schedule and now it looks
like both may play.? Allen spent time running with the first  unit in
practice so it,s really murky right now.? I,d tend to shy away from all these
guys  as I think they,ll let QB Aaron Brooks throw the ball like he did last
week.? Besides, the 49ers are  deceptively stingy against the rush ranking #
3 over the last four weeks  in rushing yards allowed  per game.???

Corey Dillon  (Cin) vs Titan Defense?? Yes, this is a tough matchup.? But so
was Denver and the jersey Dillon  wore in that particular tough matchup is
now hanging in Canton, Ohio.? I learned (and I hope you did too) to go  with
the young man pretty much regardless of the opponent.? Tennessee is very good
in defending the  rush but I see very little way you could bench Dillon
unless you,re just  loaded.?

Jamal Lewis  (Bal) vs Charger Defense?? Lewis is clearly the class of the
rookie crop offensively.? I hear  some say they think his early season elbow
injury was actually a blessing as it  let him stay fresh.? I don,t know
about that but I do know he,s running very hard and effectively.? He does
draw a tough matchup this week  against a Charger defense that,s only
allowing 81 rushing yards per game over  the last 4 games which earns them a
ranking of # 5.? Still though, you pretty much have to  ride Lewis if he,s
your guy.?

Jerome  Bettis (Pit) vs Giant Defense?? This could be a classic battle
between two big backs in Ron Dayne and Jerome Bettis.? Bettis lives for these
kind of games and  he,ll get to lay it on the line Sunday.?  He,s a likely
starter in your league but the Giants are tough against the  rush.? Over the
last four weeks,  they rank # 6 in rushing  yards allowed per game.?  I,d
still feel good about starting Bettis if he were on my roster but you  need
to be aware it,ll likely be tough going.

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


There will be a Budget Meeting next Monday in EB3127 at 9:30.

Vanessa
(for Irena)
x36143


Dan,

Would you please review a draft side letter that would cover the end of
quarter
true-up calculation?  With the uncertainty of the prices in the power market,
we would
like to just have a side letter to address the end of quarter true-up
payment.  It also
is possible that we may want to have multilple on-peak  or off-peak agreements
that will be executed.

Feel free to change as needed.

Ruth


as discussed
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 05:19
PM ---------------------------

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
08/02/2000 03:41 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Miles/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT, Harold Bertram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Bierbach/DEN/ECT@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Wasaff/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Gopalan/LON/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Don Cornwell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Katrin Haux/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, James A
Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Seitz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim
Crowder/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mitch Olson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John McClain/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Dan Minter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bill
Abler/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Emily Wander/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron,
Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Public Report 08-01

Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Daily Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

Please note that this report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone
presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation
or customer communication.


Lee informed me today {7/12th}  that Global Octane has experience
"operational" problems beginning last night and will be down until further
notice.

  Note:  This outage is considered "Force Majeure"  thus, whatever flows
during this time period should be allocated to the "term" deal.

 Lee was very specific toward this issue not being a buyback.

Howard, Please forward this information to whomever need it in
Settlement....thanks.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for JDSU  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Companies Reporting Earnings Thursday - 2     (RealTimeTraders.com) - The following companies are expected to report earnings on Thursday.  The company's name is followed by its ticker, the quarter for which it will report and the amount market analysts expect it to earn: Level 3 Communications (LVLT) Q3 -$1.92    American International Group (AIG) Q3 $0.55    VeriSign (VRSN) Q3 $0.16   JDS Uniphase (JDSU) Q1 -$0.03    Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT) Q3 $0.05    Healthsouth (HRC) Q3 $0.20     For a complete list of companies reporting earnings Thursday, please visit our earnings page. Copyright(c) 2001 RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Sector/Industry Changes  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


Hi Kent,

I can get a redline done for you if you want to tell me what it should be
redlined against.

I don't know about getting rid of the requirement for the inhouse counsel
opinion.  Maybe after you look at things we can discuss it.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001 03:08
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 04:56:21 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

 Attached please find the latest Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement
(second document below), as well as a blackline (first document below)
showing changes made to the version circulated last Friday.  Pursuant to
your instructions, the performance values in Article 10 are per the 24
Unit master agreement.  In addition no changes have been made to the
Maximum or Unit Liability Amounts or payment schedule. To complete the
agreement, we will need to insert the date of execution and Exhibit H-2.

 <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC>>
<<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 3.DOC>>
 - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC
 - Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 3.DOC


04:33 20Nov2001 RSF-Platt's: Enron sees cash drain, warns on survival

New York (Platts)--20Nov2001/533 am EST/1033 GMT Enron filed Q3 financials late Monday, revealing a huge cash drain, despite last week's $1.5-bil asset-backed infusion from merger partner Dynegy. Enron said its cash Friday had fallen to $1.2-bil, even with the Dynegy payment three days earlier, $550-mil drawn on a new bank line last week and $3-bil drawn on existing lines earlier this month to pay off $1.9-bil of commercial paper. Enron blamed operating costs, trade settlements and collateral deposits paid to trading partners. Enron said it expects $800-mil soon from asset sales and got another $440-mil bank line Monday. But it warned it might not be enough to keep its investment-grade credit rating or restructure debt coming due. That could have a "material adverse impact on Enron's ability to continue as a going concern," it warned.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
07:08 AM ---------------------------

"Endo, Steven" <sendo@ci.pasadena.ca.us> on 03/28/2001 07:11:35 PM
To: "Tori Kuykendall (E-mail)" <Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com>, "Suzanne
Christiansen (E-mail)" <Suzanne.Christiansen@enron.com>, "Jan Sutherland
(E-mail)" <Jan.Sutherland@enron.com;>, Kim.Ward@enron.com
cc:
Subject: April 2001 Nomination

All-

The total nomination for month of April 2001 is 10,506MMBtu per day.  This
includes:

1. 4,135MMBtu/day purchase from Engage @ Kingsgate (4,006MMBtu/day @ Malin);
2. 3,000MMBtu/day APEA gas;
3. 1,000MMBtu/day balance of year strip purchased on behalf of Azusa @
$7.71/MMBtu;
4. 2,000MMBtu/day under two separate fixed contracts of 1,000MMBtu/day each;
4. 500MMBtu/day March 2001 through Feb strip purchased @ $7.63;

Losses on the PG & E line have decreased from March 2001 to 3.12%.  We have
not sold any of the APEA gas (3,000MMBtu/day)at this time.

To review the phone conversation between Jan and me, we are planning to shut
down our last steam plant for maintenance from midnight March 30, 2001
through 1800 or so April 11, 2001.  Kim and I have arranged for Enron to
purchase the non-APEA gas during that period.  At this time, we believe that
the power plant will burn enough gas during the last 20 days of the month to
use the APEA gas.  If anything changes, I will notify you.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks.

-Steve