Looks OK.? I think the minor changes reflected in the attached file will make
it clearer.

--
John R. Bonica
John R. Bonica, P.C.
3403 Marquart, Suite 203
Houston, Texas 77027-6509

Telephone: (713) 659-6500

jrbonica@bonica.com

This e-mail message may contain confidential information belonging to the
sender that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from
disclosure. This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If you are not the named addressee, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any
part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com]
Sent: April 11, 2001 3:58 PM
To: tomcones@gulfcoastpipeline.com; JRBonica@Bonica.com
Cc: Michael.W.Morris@enron.com; Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
Subject: Re: Marked draft HPL GCPC Gas Transportation Agreement

Gentlemen,

I have attached the revised Exhibit "C" as discussed this afternoon.? If
you have any questions please give me a call.

(See attached file: Gulf coast revised Ex.C.doc)

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

?
 - 15677_1.DOC


I have some suggested Gas Daily pricing on the attached.  I will discuss this
with Charlie.


Please find attached the revised address  list?for the OU Energy Management
Board of Advisors.? If you cannot  print this list from MS WORD - I will mail
you a hard copy.
?
I hope to see some of you Monday night when Ted  speaks before the Oklahoma
City Association of Petroleum Landmen.
?
Bruce Coates
405/478-1510
coates@keytech.com
?
 - Plmboard.doc


Please forward to Gov't Affairs group.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tammy R Shepperd                           10/17/2000 08:07 AM

To: Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA Power Strategy

Attached are the materials that were presented at the Power Strategy meeting
Monday.

Tammy Shepperd
x36589


pls print with attachments.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/16/2000
08:42 AM ---------------------------

John M Rose@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/15/2000 06:53 PM
To: Bill Gang@EES
cc: Bill Votaw@ECT, Jerry D Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven Harris@ENRON,
Drew Fossum@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg@ENRON, Stephen Thome@ECT

Subject: Pueblo

Bill,

Yesterday, we decided to look at two options for Pueblo; a 60 MW case and a
140 MW case.  In order to match these outputs as closely as possible with
available equipment, I made the following selections:

Case 1
Equipment     3 X GE LM 2500 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1
X 22 MW Steam Turbine Generator
Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft   67 MW
Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F)  73.4 MW
Heat Rate at avg. conditions  8170 Btu/kWh (HHV)

Case 2
Equipment     3 X GE LM 6000 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1
X 44 MW Steam Turbine Generator
Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft   130 MW
Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F)  143.7 MW
Heat Rate at avg. conditions  7900 Btu/kWh (HHV)

There is a wide fluctuation in ambient temperature in Albuquerque and I sized
the blocks based on 95 deg F but used the annual average output at 60 deg F
for estimating power sales.  I have attached files that show the build-up of
the estimated EPC price for the plants.

The required power prices are projected in a simple-minded economics file
attached.  The projections are based on:

70% debt financing at 10% rate.
10-year project and debt life.
8500 hours per year at average output (97% capacity factor).
Gas at $4.40/MMBtu.

The results turn out pretty much as anticipated.  Even with the larger plant,
we'd have to sell the power for over 6c/kWh.


Sally,

Fallon's goal is to try to get all ENA Estate and EGM Estate employees on the 4th floor.  They are asking us to squeeze into 45 desks (doesn't include offices and admin stations).

Operations employees supporting EIM and EGM were already counted in EGM's and EIM's counts.

I'm trying to find out if the Estate employees under Bob Hall employees were counted in Don Miller's count.

Bottom line is, if Fallon really wants to get everyone on the 4th floor, he's going to have to wait until EOL moves to 6, or pay to shift EOL somewhere else in the meantime.

TS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spiller, Tina
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:15 PM
To:	Nahas, Al
Cc:	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Subject:	ECS Consolidation

Al,

ENW would most likely fit in the spaces we discussed (141-198) barring any major shift in the number of employees classified as NetCo or Estate.  It will probably be at least 3-4 days before the number can be determined.  However, I've learned that EOL will not be moving to the 6th floor for at least 2 weeks due to a lack of space on the churn schedule.

There are 32 EOL employees in the 301-346 range that would have to move temporarily to accomplish your goal. You should speak with Tammy Shepperd about this as she is coordinating the EOL move to the 6th floor.

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
President & CEO
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone 713.853.5746
Fax 713.646.8070


Beth,

Thanks. I shall be in London in February.

Vince

Beth S Perlman
01/11/2000 02:13 AM
Sent by: Beth Perlman
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Congratulations.

Congrats to you too!  I'll see you in February unless you're in London
sooner.  Can't wait to start up the dinner club again!

See you soon.

Beth

Vince J Kaminski
11/01/2000 00:01
To: Beth Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Congratulations.

Beth,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Gerald,

 I spoke with Jennifer Whitney regarding paperwork and orientation. I
am scheduled to meet with Jennifer at 8:30 a.m. on 21 May 2001. After
completing the requisite paperwork, I am scheduled to report to your legal
department. I just wanted to inform you so that you know what I will be
doing on the morning of the 21st.

 See you on Monday,

 Majed Nachawati

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
> Subject: RE: Starting Date
>
>
> Give Molly a call and check with her.  She may want you to report to her
> first.  Otherwise we'll see you on the 21st.
>
>
>
>
>
>                     "Nachawati,
>
>                     Nabil, M"              To:
> "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
>                     <nnachawa@Centr        cc:
>
>                     al.UH.EDU>             Subject:     RE: Starting Date
>
>
>
>                     05/15/2001
>
>                     02:30 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gerald,
>
>      I hope everything is going well in the office. The start date
> remains the same (May 21st). I wanted to know if I report to you on the
> 21st, or if I need to report to Molly Magee in Human Resources for anymore
> paperwork, etc.?
>
> Talk to you soon,
>
> Majed Nachawati
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:59 AM
> > To:     nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
> > Subject:     RE: Starting Date
> >
> > Majed,  Wanted to make sure you are still scheduled to start on May 21.
> > Let me know if anything has changed.  Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 10:57 AM -----
> >
> >
> >                     "Nachawati,
> >
> >                     Nabil, M"              To:
> > "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com '" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
> >                     <nnachawa@Centr        cc:
> >
> >                     al.UH.EDU>             Subject:     RE: Starting
> Date
> >
> >
> >
> >                     04/17/2001
> >
> >                     06:01 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gerald,
> >
> > I hope everything is going well with respect to your work load! I know
> > that
> > you are probably very busy with conference calls. Anyway, I look forward
> > to
> > working in your department this summer. I have already taken my drug
> test,
> > and have given Molly Magee my start dates (tentatively with your
> > approval).
> > I have my start date scheduled to commence on May 21, 2001 and end on
> June
> > 29, 2001. I hope these dates coincide with your schedule. Please e-mail
> me
> > and let me know.
> >
> > Looking Forward to this summer,
> >
> > Majed Nachawati
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
> > To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
> > Sent: 4/17/2001 5:09 PM
> > Subject: Starting Date
> >
> > Nabil,  Can you please provide the dates that you are planning on
> > working
> > for the 1st half of the summer. I called your residence earlier today,
> > but
> > your machine did not pick up.    It is probably easier to communicate
> > via
> > email since we both keep missing each other.  Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Bob Badeer
deal 480061
Per Prebon the price should be $85.05 instead of $85.00

Thanks!!


So are you up for any friendly or unfriendly bets on this weeks big show
down?  I don't think the lines are out yet but I'm sure you guys will be
favored by at least a touchdown.  So I'll take the Aggies +7.  How about the
loser either picks up the first round or the whole night the next time we
hit the town, although the later might be pretty steep.  Don't know if your
a gambling gal but I thought I would at least present this opportunity to
you.

Anyway, how's the old option book?  Are you getting a handle on the whole
macro thing?  Look on the bright side it is only a three day week and I'm
sure you'll get the whole 40 in.

Take it easy.

Kyle
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


ok

Cindy Olson
05/08/2001 11:48 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees

Steve, I think we have consensus on how we would like the part ttime people
handled in the PRS process for mid year.....okay.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001
11:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/06/2001 04:10 PM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees

Cindy I chatted with Elyse (Elizabeth Labanowski never returned my calls or
messages) on the pt/rh issue.   Elyse is in favor of having the pt/rh
employees in the regular PRC process, with education for managers and at
facilitator training and a statement in the ground rules to ensure that they
are not penalized or otherwise disadvantaged by the process.

David and I discussed this option which he is in favor of it as well.  In the
meantime for year end we will be ready with a system change to allow us to
see pt/rh employees on the screen segregated from the full timers- and to
have a live chart of pt/rh employees as well as the full timers.  We can't do
that for mid-year because it requires a good deal of programming, but it is a
feature we can incorporate at year end.

what do you think?

Gina


I have received several calls this morning regarding the above, so apparently
there is some doubt.  Please be advised that the executive committee will not
meet today.  Further, due to travel schedules and the holidays, executive
committee meetings will not be held on Monday, December 18 or Monday,
December 25.

Please make note that the next executive committee meeting will be held on
Tuesday, January 2, 2001at 11:00 a.m. in EB50 Boardroom.

Don't hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Regards and Happy Holidays!
Sherri
x3-5984


Barry,

Attached is a revised origination schedule for 3rd quarter and supporting detail.

Please provide any revisions by Wednesday, October 31.  I will consolidate the originations for all teams and submit to Louise.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Have a Great Day,
   Carol L. Carter
   713-853-1945


Attached are the letters sent to Senators Wyden, Feinstein & Murkowski.


Russell:
Here is what their letter should say to us:

Reference is made to the Guaranty Agreement dated as of September 1, 1998
from American Central Gas Companies, Inc. ("Guarantor") for the benefit of
Enron North America Corp. ("Enron").  By letter addressed to you dated April
6, 2000 (the "Termination Letter"), Guarantor terminated its obligations
under the Guaranty.  The purpose of this letter is to notify Enron that such
Termination Letter is null and void such that no termination of the Guaranty
by Guarantor has occurred.  In addition, Guarantor hereby agrees to amend the
Guaranty by (1) changing the amount set forth in Section 1(b) from $1,000,000
to $2,000,000 and (2) by changing the text of the fourth paragraph in Section
6 to read as follows:  "This Guaranty shall terminate on the date (such date
being the "Termination Date") that is the earlier of (a) July __, 2000 or (b)
the effective date of any written notice of termination sent by Guarantor as
set forth below.   Guarantor may terminate this Guaranty by providing written
notice of such termination to ECT and upon the effectiveness of such
termination, Guarantor shall have no further liability hereunder, except as
provided in the last sentence of this paragraph.  No such termination by
Guarantor shall be effective until five (5) days after receipt by ECT of such
termination notice.  No termination of this Guaranty pursuant to the
provisions of this paragraph shall affect Guarantor's liability with respect
to any Transaction (as defined in the Contracts) entered into prior to the
Termination Date, which Transaction shall remain guaranteed pursuant to the
terms of this Guaranty."

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this letter, by signing in
the space provided below.


Hi, Teb:
Here's my flight info.:
Leave Manchester airport on Thurs., Dec. 20, at 5:50 p.m. on Continental Flt.
1445.
Stop in Cleveland--no change--and arrive Houston Intercontinental at 10:33
p.m.

Leave Houston on Sun., Dec. 30, at 10:50 a.m. on Continental Flt. 644; arrive
Cleveland at 2:32; change planes, leave at 3:30 on Flt. 1226, and arrive
Manchester 5:03 p.m.

If you have any kind of conflict whatsoever, please let me know as I'm sure
Pres would be able to pick me up Thurs. and take me on Sunday. I don't want
this to interfere with anything going on in your life.

Ann Demeranville said to give you a big hug and wish you a happy holiday, in
spite of all you are going through at Enron.

Love,
Sandy


You are Invited to a Private Party!
http://www.emailbucks.com/entry/bentry.cgi?NCC_PrivateParty
JUST CUM INSIDE!

WHAT: Biggest, Baddest Porn Show!
WHEN: Right Fucking Now!
WHERE: HERE! Just Click HERE!
WHY: You Need to Ask?

*Over 100 live girls for you to fuck and chat with!
*Special Live Show from Ibiza Spain!
*We are talking tennis racquets & we are absolutely serious!
*Peeing, Tranny, Mature, Chopsticks, Bottles, X-large, Feet...
*Penetration!!! Yes indeed...Just pick a hole!
*Bi-Curious? No Problem!
*Completely Uncensored Celeb Content !
*B.S's x-clusive lesbo licking paparazzi video clip!
More? You want more? Don't you worry!

We Really Know How to Throw a Party!
http://www.emailbucks.com/entry/bentry.cgi?NCC_PrivateParty
JUST CUM INSIDE!

NO CREDIT CARD! NO CHECK! NO EMAILS!
NO PERSONAL INFO! NO BULLSHIT!
http://www.emailbucks.com/entry/bentry.cgi?NCC_PrivateParty
JUST CUM INSIDE!
To unsubscribe, follw this link http://list.emailbucks.com/unsubscribe.jsp?id=MdzqJp%2FH4VZlqHGW47QfPLhvxj%2BuvvsGiHdocdjSsSk%3D


Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030809.txt


Thanks. I put in a call to those guys and am waiting to hear back. In the
meantime, maybe you could call their in house counsel to get reaquainted
since you've already worked together...

One other item - the Pompano developers agreement - I need to talk to you
about this tomorrow (early if possible) as local counsel is waiting for our
comments. I heard rumor that AEW was still working on this despite her
vacation. In any case, we need to get some comments back to Debbie Orshefsky
on Thursday if possible.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tue 5/29/2001 1:22 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc:
Subject: Re: Conference call w/ TECO

 Anytime which works for you is fine, as this is more important than my other
meeting.

 From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 01:19 PM
 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
 cc:

 Subject: Conference call w/ TECO

 Kay:

 My afternoon tomorrow looks full - do you have any time before 2 PM to
discuss the TECO MOU and have a call with them? I will check their schedules
as well...


Southwest Airlines e-mail update for
May 15, 2001

****************************************************************
Gas prices got you down?  Let us give you a lift!

We're driven to give you the best deals and here's
our *Special Edition offering this week:

1. Anniversary Specials for $30 each way
with a *7-day advance purchase

2. Click 'n Save Specials
with a *7-day advance purchase

3. Save time, save money, and earn a free Award Ticket
faster with Rapid Rewards double credit!

4. Free subscription for the latest specials via e-mail

******** $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials ************

I. This week's Anniversary Specials:
...as a reminder, scroll down to the Click 'n Save section
for additional specials...

The following restrictions will apply:

*Available only at southwest.com
*7-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel May 22, 2001 through October 26, 2001.
*Purchase beginning May 15, 2001 through
 May 17, 2001, midnight Pacific Time.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $30 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $30 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field

Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $30 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $30 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $30 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $30 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $30 each way to/from Providence, RI

Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Buffalo, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $30 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $30 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $30 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Cleveland, OH
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Columbus, OH
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $30 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $30 each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $30 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $30 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

El Paso, TX
 $30 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field

Houston, TX Hobby
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Indianapolis, IN
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $30 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Little Rock, AR
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Lubbock, TX
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field

Manchester, NH
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from El Paso, TX

Nashville, TN
 $30 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $30 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

New Orleans, LA
 $30 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Orlando, FL
 $30 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Providence, RI
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

San Antonio, TX
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

San Diego, CA
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Jose, CA
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $30 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $30 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $30 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $30 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $30 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Omaha, NE

Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Tucson, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve the
Southwest Airlines 30th Anniversary Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares.shtml?src=30th0515

******* southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials********
II. In addition to the Anniversary Specials, we have
included the traditional southwest.com
Click 'n Save Specials.

The following restrictions will apply:

*Available only at southwest.com
*7-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel May 22, 2001 through October 26, 2001
*Purchase beginning May 15, 2001 through
 May 17, 2001, midnight Pacific Time

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Albany, NY
 $59 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $66 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Albuquerque, NM
 $94 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $63 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $68 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Amarillo, TX
 $94 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $94 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Austin, TX
 $61 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $67 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $52 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $69 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $45 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $62 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $63 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Birmingham, AL
 $61 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $58 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Boise, ID
 $54 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $94 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Buffalo, NY
 $66 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Burbank, CA
 $37 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $37 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Chicago, IL Midway
 $52 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $61 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $67 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $65 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $67 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $67 each way to/from Providence, RI
 $52 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Cleveland, OH
 $59 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $42 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $63 each way to/from Providence, RI

Columbus, OH
 $63 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $94 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $48 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field

Dallas, TX Love Field
 $48 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $56 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $59 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Detroit, MI
 $56 each way to/from Nashville, TN

El Paso, TX
 $61 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $56 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $58 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $94 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $94 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $59 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $67 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway

Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $55 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $53 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Houston, TX Hobby
 $55 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $53 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $41 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Indianapolis, IN
 $94 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $94 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Jackson, MS
 $69 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $65 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway

Jacksonville, FL
 $58 each way to/from Birmingham, AL

Las Vegas, NV
 $63 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $94 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $54 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $94 each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $48 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $94 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $48 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $55 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $55 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $42 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $56 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Los Angeles, CA
 $68 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $45 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $37 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Louisville, KY
 $65 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $62 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Lubbock, TX
 $94 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Manchester, NH
 $67 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $53 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $53 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

Nashville, TN
 $67 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $45 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $56 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $56 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $42 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $59 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 $66 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

New Orleans, LA
 $41 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $45 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $45 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Oakland, CA
 $37 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $48 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $58 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $45 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $48 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $94 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $65 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Omaha, NE
 $94 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Ontario, CA
 $37 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Orlando, FL
 $66 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $66 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $63 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $45 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Phoenix, AZ
 $58 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $94 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $58 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $52 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Portland, OR
 $45 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $94 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $45 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Providence, RI
 $67 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $63 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $52 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $42 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $51 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $58 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $47 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Sacramento, CA
 $37 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $48 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $37 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $52 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $56 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $49 each way to/from Spokane, WA
 $66 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Antonio, TX
 $58 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $62 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

San Diego, CA
 $41 each way to/from San Jose, CA

San Jose, CA
 $37 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $45 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $41 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $48 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $47 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $56 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Spokane, WA
 $49 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

St. Louis, MO
 $62 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $37 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Tampa Bay, FL
 $63 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $59 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $45 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Tucson, AZ
 $94 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $66 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Tulsa, OK
 $62 each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $37 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $66 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $51 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve this
week's Click 'n Save Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/

*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares.shtml?src=cns0515

******** This is the Additional Information section********
Additional Information You Need to Know About All
of Our Sales:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel Online may only be purchased with
 a credit card. Customers holding funds from
 a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
 who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
 those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods, such as Memorial weekend
 and Independence Day.

*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

************* southwest.com Rapid Rewards **************
Double your Rapid Rewards flight credits and earn
a free Award Ticket faster when you book your next
flight on southwest.com.
For more information, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

****************** Subscriber Information *******************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/
****************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: gstorey@ect.enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 08:10
AM ---------------------------
SUSAN
SMITH
12/20/99 11:27 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: January Production Estimate

Daren/Carlos:

 I did not receive any more customer nominations. Therefore, the attached
file should not have changed from what was provided to Carlos last week.
Please let me know if you have any questions,

 Thanks, SCS x 33321
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Smith/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 11:23 AM
---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
12/17/99 04:07 PM
To: Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: January Production Estimate

Susan,

Please see the attached file for January's production estimate.  This is
pretty much the final estimate except that I have calls in to Costilla &
Walter (Superior).  They both said that they would fax their nom once it was
complete.  Hopefully this will be by Monday.  If not, all of the traders have
reviewed the estimate and made their changes.  I feel pretty confident that
this is a good number.  However, if your should receive any noms before
Monday at noon, please update the file and send it to Carlos and Daren.

Thanks and Merry Christmas to you and yours!

vlt
x3-6353


Hey Rob,

I am trying to create index products for Feb and I don't see the Jan products
to copy. I need HPL HSCX, HPL HSCX E, HPL Agua Dulce, HPL Thompsonville, and
Corpus Christi Pool.

Thanks,
Eric
x3-0977


We have received the following executed EEI agreements

Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. - 12/4/2000
Lassen Municipal Utility District - 10/30/2000
Clatskanie People's Utility District - 10/25/2000

Copies will be given to legal and credit.


I will be on vacation but will be there the next week.
PL


Congratulations on your promotion--well deserved!!
Lucy


(See attached file: HPLN1117.xls)

 - HPLN1117.xls


Susan --

Please take the lead on coordinating our response.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth; Fulton, Donna; Novosel, Sarah; Robertson, Linda; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Alvarez, Ramon; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	Rulemaking on Public Utility Filing Requirements

Please see the attached summary of the notice of proposed rulemaking recently issued by FERC which proposes to revise the transactional reporting requirements for public utilities (including power marketers).  EPSA will be hosting several discussions and probably preparing comments (which are due October 5).  We need to discuss whether Enron wants to file its own comments.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596

 << File: RM01-8 summary.doc >>


Fundamentals of Corporate Finance - May 24 & 25, 2001
in EB552   Cost:  $700.00

Do need to improve your understanding of Financial Statements?

Do you want to learn how Financial Statements disclosure is linked to Enron
activities?

Are you interested in learning about analysis of projections or
Improving your understanding of ratio analysis?

If your answer is yes, then this class is for you.

For registration, please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at 713 853-3057.


Hi. I think you attached the wrong document...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:04 PM
To:	Thorne, Judy
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Zivley, Jill T.
Subject:	RE: Aspect,Helmerick & Payne, Wilmar, etc amendment revision

Here is the revised Confirm.  Please review.

 << File: AVISTA Amendment.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thorne, Judy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Zivley, Jill T.
Subject:	Aspect,Helmerick & Payne, Wilmar, etc amendment revision

Debra,

Based on further discussions with the customer, Jill Zivley has negotiated a revised price for the amendment that you recently prepared for the Aspect, Helmerick & Payne, et al. contract. The revised pricing should be 80% of FOM at IF Houston Ship Channel less .075 and 20% of FOM at GD less .065.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these changes to the amendment. We need to send this to the customer by tomorrow morning.

Thanks,
Judy


I am currently working on a form for the master netting without the CSA.  It is somewhat complicated--so if you have such a request, please await the new form.  Do not try to do it yourself.  Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Thanks.  Let me know how the desk sees it.  Also, please make sure that we talk with EES gas (Don Black).

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject:	EPSA filing on capacity releases

I reviewed the EPSA filing, and I have no problems, but Becky is going to run it by the desk to make sure it is okay with them.  Becky and I have been talking about what we will file and I plan to work on that today and tomorrow, but here is the thumbnail of it.

FERC is trying in the rule to give intraday recall rights to releasing shippers.   If this applies to all transactions, it obviously devalues and degrades capacity releases.  The proper approach is let the parties negotiate the arrangements they want and for the payment to reflect the level of firmness actually given.  In other words, if a releasing shipper wants the recall rights that FERC would give them as a matter of law in this rule, then they spell those rights out in their posting and negotiate the deal with that on the table.  If a shipper is willing to release capacity and forego any recall rights, they should be able to do this, and receive payment that reflects the nature of that service.  But having a rule that mandates recall that cannot be negotiated is uncalled for and contrary to the purposes of capacity release and open access.


Texas is good...  O

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January  28, 2002 1:31 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	EOL products

Now that we know which traders will be moving over, or we should, we need to make a second pass at the EOL product list.  Can you confirm with your desk heads that the list of names we have is correct, and then update the product mappings by tomorrow afternoon?

O:\erms\erms_adm\netco\controls\Trader-Book template (US Gas)_EOL new books.xls

Thanks

KK


Thanks for the draft.  Will circulate internally and respond.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"ROBERT LAMB" <LAMB@wrightlaw.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	glazec@pjm.com
Cc:	HARRISPG@charon.pjm.com; janderson@elcon.org; myacker@elcon.org; jsteffe@enron.com; dsalvosa@epsa.org; mbennett@epsa.org; drom@pjm.com; Cole Keith; Barry SPECTOR
Subject:	Draft revisions to the 9/6/01 Bingaman reliability provision

Enclosed is my draft of possible revisions to the above-referenced reliability provision, taking into
account suggestions by Craig. I have enclosed a redline version and a clean one. The revision does
the following:
1.By adding"without hindering reliable, non-discriminatory, and efficiently priced transmission service"
it uses words of art from FERC Order No. 2000 and shows the intertwined nature of security and commercial practices.
2.By adding the reference to section 201(f), it specifically includes  Federal and State entities.
3.There is no named reference for any particular industry  standards body---thus no attempt to either
provide an advantage or disadvantage to any existing body.
4.The FERC could take into consideration recommendations of enties with technical expertise regarding reliability standards---such as WECC , Regional Advisory Bodies, and the States.
5. FERC could assign enforcement responsibility in a given area to any appropriate entity---such as WECC or RTOs.
6.It puts in a definition of reliability standards that is limited to security and, by not including adequacy, is
not as intrusive on prerogatives of States.
7.I bracketed the possibility of a States savings provision for further consideration. Of course, the
narrower the scope---i.e. no consideration of generation adequacy---the less need there is for such
a provision.
Please give me any feedback.
Bobby

 - SEC 410 redline.doc << File: SEC 410 redline.doc >>
 - SEC 410 clean3.doc << File: SEC 410 clean3.doc >>


Dorie,
I share Dave's skepticism.

Ray Bowen

David W Delainey
11/30/2000 11:26 AM
To: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 ENA/EGM/EIM CUSTOMER SKI PROGRAM

Dorie, I have to question the effectiveness of this program.  Over the years,
it appears that more spots are being filled by Enron people then customers.
The effectiveness of this forum from a customer point of view is
questionable.  I vote to kill it.

Please forgive the approach - but I would like to provoke a discussion with
my partners.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
11:20 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dorie Hitchcock                           11/30/2000 06:40 AM

To: Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robyn Zivic/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Bierbach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Craig
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C
Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy King/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim Battaglia@Enron,
Douglas B Dunn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred
Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON,
John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 ENA/EGM/EIM CUSTOMER SKI PROGRAM

Winter is just around the corner and the new ski season will be opening
soon.  Please review the proposed information below, regarding the
ENA/EGM/EIM Customer Ski Program, to help us determine what our needs will be
for the 2001 season.

Location:  Beaver Creek, Colorado
Preliminary Dates:  February 21 - March 14, 2001
Approximate Cost Per Person:  $2,600 (based on 82 participants)

The preliminary dates have been divided into 6 trips:
TRIP	DATES	TOTAL # OF BEDS
Trip 1	Wed, February 21 - Sat, February 24	11
Trip 2	Sun, February 25 - Wed, February 28	17
Trip 3	Wed, February 28 - Sat, March 3	13
Trip 4	Sun, March 4 - Wed, March 7	13
Trip 5	Wed, March 7 - Sat, March 10	13
Trip 6	Sun, March 11 - Wed, March 14	15

The program cost per person includes:
? Four days/three nights accommodations in luxurious private homes in the
premier Holden Road/Borders Road area of Beaver  Creek with daily maid service
? Animated invitation with on-line registration
? Round-trip airport ground transportation
? Experienced property hosts
? Daily lift tickets and ski instruction
? Ski equipment rental
? Catered dinner two nights
? Catered breakfast daily
? Off-site dinner coordination
? Alternate activity coordination
? Private vans at each house
? One massage with experienced in-house massage therapists
? Enron promotional gift item
? Pre-program administration and coordination
? On-site operation

If you are interested in participating in the 2001 ski program, please submit
an email  request to me no later than Friday, December 8th, including the
following information:
Name
Company
Department
Telephone
Fax
Number of People
Choice of Dates (1st, 2nd & 3rd)
Company #
RC #

The week of December 11th, all requests will be compiled for review and final
approval.

Questions should be directed to my attention at (713) 853-6978.


Rob,
This is Jeff.  I'm with Susan in her office listening to the call.  Hey bud,
LANDMINE!  Look at the new SoCalGas language respecting the Edison/SDG&E
contract in Section 1.9.  Whadaythink?  Write back at this address!  Are you
going to raise the issue?


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000 05:47
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 07/26/2000 08:53:48 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com, "Barnas, Michael C (PS, Legal)"
<michael.barnas@ps.ge.com>
cc:

Subject: Sample SSEP Contract

Attached is a draft of the SSEP standard packaging contract.  This is
currently
being converted to our EDrafter Web-based format (The business person fills
in a
database of information and populates the document, which is then sent to the
customer).  Our next phase in this process would actually be to make EDrafter
available to the customers for them to fill it in and work from it in a
ProjectNet extranet workroom environment.

Regardless of what document we end up with in our process, I think we should
consider a similar process for our "template document".  It would be efficient
for the business people (for example, the SSEP sales force can generate the
attached contract in about 10 minutes) and would free up legal time for both
parties.  Just food for thought.

Kent

 <<Package Standard Contract.doc>>

 - Package Standard Contract.doc


Daren - was there a deal for 5.000 at CP&L on Feb. 21?  CP&L shows 5.000, but
I have looked in MOPS and there is not a deal.  Can you verify whether or not
there was a deal for that day?  Thanks.

Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 01:39
PM ---------------------------

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:18 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Central Power & Light

Aimee,

I received a call from CP&L about the February 2001 production invoice.  They
are showing 5,000 mmbtu on February 21 for HPL.  We are not showing anything
for HPL on that day.  Could you verify if this is correct?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca


---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/09/2000
11:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Eric Benson                           08/08/2000 08:08 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron

Subject: 2001 ET&S Budget Templates - DRAFT as of 8/7/00

Drew -

Attached are the latest drafts of the Northern and Transwestern budget
templates for your review and comment.  Changes were made to legal fees for
both cost centers as per my notes from the last group meeting we had on
budget.  In addition, you should have received the latest consolidated budget
run and the latest outside counsel spreadsheet for 2001.

Let me know if you have any questions, modifications, concerns, etc.

Eric


Did you see the first three games of the divisional series?  4 of the 6
starters were former Astro pitchers - within the last three years.  Halama,
Garcia for Seattle - Randy Johnson trade, Hampton and Kyle.  How sickening is
that.  However, McClain has said he is going to up the budget for next year
by....1 MILLION $, yee haw.
PL


To All:

Recently, Mark asked me to focus efforts on putting together a technology
plan for the Legal Department.  Attached for your information is a draft of
the proposed plan.

As you will see, the central goal of the plan is to enhance our position as
essential members of the business team by providing - through the
implementation of available technology tools  - efficient means of enabling
our clients to meet their business objectives.  The plan attempts to meet
this overall goal through three different, but related phases, each of which
can be implemented independently.  Timing of implementation and dedication of
resources have not been formally addressed as the plan is only in its infant
stages; however, it is Mark's goal to rapidly move forward with certain
portions of the plan.

It is my understanding that a meeting will be scheduled for next week some
time to review and discuss the proposed plan.  Prior to that meeting, if any
of you should have any comments, questions or ideas, please do not hesitate
to let me know your thoughts.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Deal NN6788.1 with Citibank has been killed.  This was an EOL deal that
Citibank and John Arnold agreed to cut in half.  Deal QF9221.1 was booked in
Dec. for half the volume of the original deal.  Unfortunately, deal NN6788.1
was not killed when we booked the new deal.  Please call me with any
questions.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274


Please mark your calendar for a mandatory staff meeting with Kevin Presto tomorrow, Oct. 24th from 4- 5pm in room 30c1.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Congratulations, Chris.

Best,
Jeff


Scott: Please see below.

1.  How much would this pricing change if power could be called ion 4 hour
blocks and the availability percentages were 97%?
       - 4 hour block call: There is a possibility to get better pricing.
 - 97% availability: Structuring wants to make sure that there is no
regulatory limitation in related to environmental issue, which may prevent
97% availability.

2.  What pricing does the 20 year project model show that we need?
 - We also need power curve from year 3 to 20 to calculate Calpine's merchant
revenue.
 - We are currently refining the model regarding IDC, residual value, etc.

3.  What additional information do you need from me to complete your analysis?
 - Unit contingency or liquidated damage protection
 - Exact location for power and gas

Once we find out unit contingency and location, I will get the pricing with a
couple of scenarios as you asked:
 - Flat and annual capacity for 3 and 5 year
 - Power curve from year 3 to 20

Jinsung

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           02/28/2000 07:53 AM

To: Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Calpine Indicative Pricing

1.  How much would this pricing change if power could be called ion 4 hour
blocks and the availability percentages were 97%?

2.  What pricing does the 20 year project model show that we need?

3.  What additional information do you need from me to complete your analysis?


Thank you very much for doing that for me!

Fletch


Judy,

Thanks for the info.  I hope you had a good holiday season.  I regret to
inform you that I will be unable to continue in my participation in JA.  I
have transitioned to a new role at Enron that will not accomodate the
schedule neccesary to effectively serve as a JA volunteer.    I  take my
commitments very seriously so my inability to fulfill this obligation is not
something I am totally comfortable with.  However, upon reviewing the
situation I realize that this decision is necessary.

Thank you for your help and energy and I wish you all the luck with the kids
and the program.  What you do is truly making a positive difference in many
of these kids' futures.

Charlie Weldon

Judith Wirzberg <wirzbergj@camerondiv.com> on 12/28/2000 01:15:29 PM
To: v.charles.weldon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: JA Company Program

Just wanted to let you know that we will not be having any JA meetings
at Cy-Fair High School until about mid-January.  Paper work will
probably be returned to me hopefully around then and we will probably
start up our meetings again around January 15th or the 22nd.  I will be
sure and send you a meeting before then.

Also, we have been asked to do the Aquatic Gardens centerpieces for the
Texas Society of CPA's gala.  It is being held on January 30th at the
Hyatt Regency Downtown.  They have asked that we have everything set-up
no later than 5:00 p.m. that day.  I am in the process of trying to get
the vases possibly shipped to us direct from the manufacturer.  I have
also contacted a fish store about getting the Bettas than we will be
needing.

Is it possible that you might be able to get us a guest speaker to come
to the school in late January or early February?  In the past, we have
had some one from Human Resources, a marketing person and also an IS
person come out and talk to the students.  Please let me know.

Judy Wirzberg

--
BM8h!

 - wirzbergj.vcf


Start Date: 10/17/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101720.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Zhiyang and Zhiyun,

Vince told me that London has some trouble to calculate spread option
for correl=1, vol1=vol2.  In such a case, the effective volatility becomes
zero, and the option has zero time value.

I have modified the UnitCorrPremium() routine to force the code to treat
this situation as a special case. (It returns the discounted intrinsic value).

Please incorporate this chang to your code so that it will no longer cause
any
problems that should not happen in the first place.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Zimin

-----------------------

double UnitCorrPremium(
        double s1,
        double s2,
        double strike,
        double r,
        double q1,
        double q2,
        double vol1,
        double vol2,
              double correl,
        double tmat,
        int    opttype
       )
{

 double retval;

 if (tmat <= 0.0)
  return intrinsic(s1, s2, strike, opttype);

// look right here for the change, only two lines.

 if ( (1.0-correl)<TINY && fabs(vol1-vol2)<TINY )  // for vol1=vol2, correl=1
case
  return intrinsic(s1, s2, strike, opttype)*exp(-r*tmat);

 setup (s1, s2, strike, r, q1, q2, vol1, vol2, correl, tmat);

 if(opttype)
  retval = S.disc*gauherInt(Ffunc0c)/SQRTPI;
 else
  retval = S.disc*gauherInt(Ffunc0p)/SQRTPI;

 return retval;
}


Will you email that to Brian Stone at Huber for me?

	Gerald Nemec@ECT
	12/13/2000 03:45 PM

		 To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Trailblazer Open Season

I will be revising the Capacity Release and Agreement and the existing
Trailblazer Assignment that Huber currently has to reflect the Transaction
just completed today.

Mark,  you probably should make Huber aware of this if they are not already
so.  Thanks.

	Chris Meyer
	12/13/2000 04:41 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Trailblazer Open Season

Gerald - I forgot to include you on the cc:  Also, do we need to draft the
assignment of P.A. with Huber?

chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 04:40
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Meyer                           12/13/2000 04:22 PM

To: Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trailblazer Open Season

As of 4:00 p.m. today, the ENA executed Precedent Agreements have been
delivered to Trailblazer.

Trailblazer still has outstanding P.A.'s , but expect delivery tomorrow.
Their current schedule is to send the filing to FERC on Friday with the
actual filing date on Monday, December 18th.  Should Trailblazer not meet
this time frame, I would suggest that the matter be taken up at higher levels
in the organization (i.e. Julie call Deb).

I'll follow-up on Monday.

chris
x31666


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	System Status Meeting  eb3013

Date:		7/19/2000
Time:		1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


I spoke with Sean Crandall, who told me that from his standpoint the deals
ARE separate; however, John Malowney is the mid-marketer who works with
Conoco, and he told me that this special language is fine to include in the
confirmations for these deals. Turns out I was just asking the wrong person.

Let me know if you need comments added in these deals.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   02/08/2001 08:20 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Conoco deals

Kate, please ask Sean Crandell if the following deals need the "special
phrase" ..The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Transaction is
connected with the transaction referenced in Deal No. 347356.1 entered into
between the Parties on May 31, 2001.

Jack Wells of Conoco called and said that the phrase should be included in
confirmations: 506549.01..506550.01..506551.01 and 507417.01 and 507430.01.
Please ask trader if deals are related to the 347356.01.  Sharen has inquired
once before and we were under the impression that the deals were separate and
not included.  Please let us know.

Thanks
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
10:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/08/2001 10:07 AM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conoco deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 10:06
AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/29/2001 06:22 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 507430 and 507417

Jack Wells is the contact for both - I've added his name to deal #507417.
According to Sean Crandall, these deals are separate from 347356. That deal
was a sale, and the deals entered today are all buys. Sean said we're just
buying back the MW we originally sold them. But I think that's the only
connection. Let me know if you need more of an explanation from the traders,
but our take is that these deals are separate.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/29/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 507430 and 507417

Are these two deals part of the original Conoco deal # 347356 that they are
extending or something different?  We need to know because we have to add
something in the confirmation if they are extensions of the original deal.
Also, is Jack Wells the contact for both?

Thanks!


Tori:  We have contacted Senator Gramm and Majority Leader Armey about the
calls from Ken on Monday.  Because of the uncertainty of the Congressional
schedule, both offices told us to call on Monday morning to schedule the
call.  If Ken wants to make the calls unscheduled, we expect Armey and Gramm
to both be in DC by Monday morning.

The numbers are as follows:

Senator Gramm  (202) 224-2934
Majority Leader Armey (202) 225-4000

Here are the talking points

** CONFIDENTIAL **

Talking Points on Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000

Background:

We have hit an impasse on the CFTC Reauthorization legislation.  On legal
certainty, nearly all interested parties agree.  However, Senator Gramm
continues to raise objections unrelated to legal certainty for our business.
There are two issues (which we understand have primarily been advanced by
Senator Gramm, one on bank products and one on SEC jurisdiction). Majority
Leader Dick Armey is trying to gain consensus with the interested parties
which include Senator Gramm, the Chairmen of the House Agriculture, Commerce,
and Banking Committees, as well as the Department of Treasury, CFTC, and
SEC.  Meetings are occurring on a daily basis, but little concrete progress
has been made since draft legislation was released on October 9.

Talking Points:

We need your help to resolve outstanding differences so that the Commodities
Futures Modernization Act of 2000 can pass this year.  There are very few
legislative days left and movement now on this legislation is essential. Do
not let the Congressional calendar be the enemy of gaining legal certainty
for this dynamic and growing industry.

The current version of the legislation provides important legal certainty for
all physical commodity transactions (not including agricultural commodities)
entered into on a counterparty-to-counterparty basis or on an electronic
trading facility.  We strongly support these provisions.

The legislation eliminates concerns that our derivatives transactions may be
illegal or that our online platforms may be unregulated futures exchanges.
These provisions allow our businesses to grow and innovate.  Without this
legislation the industry will be crippled with legal uncertainty and these
platforms will develop overseas.

Virtually all of the issues in this very complex legislative package have
been resolved. We are indifferent to outstanding provisions, except to the
extent that they impede passage of the legislation.  We cannot allow the
great progress made to date, fail in the end.

If asked, about a possible solution to the logjam.  Answer:  Encourage
Majority Leader Armey, Senator Gramm, and Secretary Summers to meet
immediately to finalize the remaining issues.  Given time constraints, if
such a meeting does not occur in the next few days, there may not be enough
time to pass this important legislation.

Note: Congress will be going out on either October 20 or October 27.


Congrats

John


Hi Eric,

I called earlier.  Guess you are busy.  Anyway, I made reservations at
Ruggles Grille 5115 Westheimer - Saks Fifth Ave. (where Macy's used to be)
at 6:45.  Is this o.k. with you?  LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>; <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:10 AM
Subject: Friday

> What are you doing for dinner tomorrow?  Would you like to meet up with
> Shanna and I somewhere?
>
> Let me know.
>
> -E
>


Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
ResiOil Swap.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the
new product type from the following:

US Oil HSFO Fin Swap

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Tuesday, February 27.

Thank you.
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

From:  Lisa Lees
02/23/2001 11:23 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New Product Type (US ResiOil Swap)

Just a "heads up".  This product will be uploaded next week.  Stephanie will
coordinate with you between today and Monday regarding profiles.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 10:15 AM
---------------------------

Chris Walker
02/23/2001 10:00 AM
To: Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Product Type (US ResiOil Swap)

Matthew,

Have you had a chance to look at this?

Please let me know if you need additional information.

CW

I need a sigma factor for the following product type.

Thanks,

Chris Walker
3-7533

US ResidOil Swap Platts NY No. 6 1%            Apr01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period. Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period.  The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume for the
relevant Determination Period (calculated using the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline).   The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable.  The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Apr 2001
to the Termination Date of 30 Apr 2001.

The Index shall be the arithmetic average of the mean of the daily quotations
for No. 6, 1% S Max appearing under the heading "New York/Boston Cargo" in
the section entitled "Product Price Assessments" for those issues of Platt's
Oilgram Price Reports published for the applicable Determination Period.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of measure, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.


i looked for cros but i couldn't find him.  i told him where i would be and
i  was there the whole time.  my cell wasn't working on campus.  i gave him a
call today to find out how we missed eachother.


I finally completed 2nd update of docs on DealBench. Changes are as follows;

DD indices highlight changes only made this time on 10/22/00.
I uploaded new docs with date in New Documents Section on DealBench.

Here are new indices. Thanks. Jin


Thanks, Sarah!  I was so focused on getting that in the mail that I obviously
didn't proof the content very well.  Thanks for looking out for me!  --Sally

"Sarah Marshall" <sarahm@flex.net> on 01/21/2001 07:19:55 PM
To: "Sally Beck" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Sally,
 I added league hours to your hours report for you as you attended all
patroness meetings (Oct and Nov) and the Holiday Tea.  I added 5 hours for
those meetings for a total 12 for this qtr. If it should be more, let me
know.  I wasn't there in Oct.  That makes your year to date league 33.5.
Thanks for  all your hard work with the girls.
Hours/Awards,
Sarah Marshall


I have attached a list of significant litigation along with my suggested
reserve.  Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter.


At the end of the article there is a presidential straw poll.  It shows Bush
with only a 6 point lead among oil and gas industry executives and analysts.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/22/2000 07:39 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	09/21/2000 09:23 PM

		 To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FWD: News Article

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 09/21/2000
09:17 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@EES on 09/21/2000 07:59 PM
To: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:

FYI.

Energy Is Hot
By Christopher Edmonds
Special to TheStreet.com
9/20/00 12:47 PM ET
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/comment/christopheredmonds/1088836.html
HOUSTON -- Up and to the right.
That could be the theme of the eighth annual Dain Rauscher Wessels energy
conference this week in America's self-proclaimed oil capital. Between the
whispers in the hallways and the bullish presentations from an overflowing
barrel of oil, gas and power companies, you might think you were in the
corridors of some Silicon Valley conference of yesteryear.
But, no, this is all about energy, and energy is hot. With oil hanging around
$37 per barrel and natural gas solidly above $5 per million BTU, oil, gas and
power stocks have caught fire. To illustrate, take a look at the chart of the
Philadelphia Stock Exchange Oil Service Sector Index, or OSX:

Up and to the right. And, a great deal of the price gain is rational. As the
price of the commodities increases, profits follow. That should mean positive
earnings from a plethora of oil and gas companies.
While new Securities and Exchange Commission regulations have stifled the
more explicit (now illicit) preannouncements at conferences like this,
regulations can't cap all the enthusiasm from rising commodity prices. For
example, Kenneth Lay, chairman of energy powerhouse Enron (ENE:NYSE), said at
the conference he is very comfortable with analysts' estimates, hinting the
numbers are conservative. "We should meet or exceed analysts' expectations
for the quarter and the year."
Others followed suit. Bradley Fischer, president of CMS Energy Oil and Gas
(CMS:NYSE), (profiled here earlier ), said his company will post "record
production and record income this year," because the fundamentals of the oil
and gas business are as good as they have been in his career. "I've been in
this business 28 years. The first 10 were good and the last 18 have been
difficult. Now, I'm looking for the good times to roll."
And this from Diana Naylor, senior vice president at independent power
producer Calpine (CPN:NYSE), when reacting to analysts' estimates in the
coming year. "We look to be making that number and look to increase that
[guidance on earnings] shortly."
Even the oil drillers and equipment companies are celebrating. Nabors
Industries (NBR:AMEX), owner of the largest land-drilling fleet, thinks
analysts are significantly underestimating its potential. Dain Rauscher
estimates Nabors will earn 83 cents per share this year and $1.65 next year
-- numbers Chairman and CEO Eugene Isenberg called conservative. He presented
calculations suggesting the company could earn $3.27 in the middle of the oil
cycle and has the ability to earn $6.81 in the coming years. "The probability
of this happening is very high," he said.
All because of $37 per barrel oil and $5 gas? While there is little question
that third- and fourth-quarter earnings should be strong, there is growing
concern that the oil and gas stock rally has been overdone. Not only have
stocks tracked the rise in commodity prices but the once-beleaguered sector
has also seen earnings multiples expand significantly.
That is a warning sign to at least one analyst. While the going is good, the
rapid price rise isn't sustainable. Oil stocks stocks "will peak in the next
several weeks and trade sideways, probably for the rest of the year," said
Jim Wicklund, head of energy research at Dain Rauscher, adding that there may
be added selling pressure as funds try to lock in gains before the end of the
year. "Stock [price pressure] will also be impacted by portfolio managers'
bonus structure."
And Wicklund warned that what he sees as the inevitable moderation in oil
prices will put pressure on the stocks into the new year. "Right or wrong,
stock prices are slaves to commodity prices."
If Wicklund is correct, the next move could be down and to the left.
The Peoples Court
One of the clever and unique features of the Dain Rauscher Wessels energy
conference is the annual investor poll. This year, nearly 400 investors
responded to the on-site survey and, while the results aren't scientific,
they are likely instructive.
Power to the People - Investors Speak
Dain Rauscher Wessels Energy Conference Survey Results
Prediction for price of oil (per barrel)
on 12/31/2000$32.70
Prediction for price of oil (per barrel)
on 12/31/200127.70
Average price of oil in 200128.80
Price of Natural Gas (per MM BTU)
on 12/31/20005.50
Price of Natural Gas (per MM BTU)
on 12/31/20014.60
Closing Price of Oil Stock Index
(OSX) on 12/31/2000137.90
Closing Price of Oil Stock Index
(OSX) on 12/31/2001147.00
Will the OSX outperform the
S&P 500 in 2000Yes - 93.7%, No - 6.3%
Will the OSX outperform the
S&P 500 in 2001Yes - 67.7%, No - 32.3%
Favorite Merger PartnersChevron with Texaco, Unocal
or Phillips - 35%
Top Energy Stocks for the Next YearKey Energy, ExxonMobil, Enron
Presidential Straw PollBush 53%, Gore 47%
Source: Dain Rauscher Wessels
Investors see oil prices moderating a little between now and December and
further into next year. However, survey participants do not see the same
pattern for natural gas, with estimates for gas prices remaining well above
$4.50 through next year.
And what may at first appear to be good news for George W. Bush probably
isn't. A six-point lead looks nice, but remember -- we're on his home turf,
Texas, among his brethren in the oil business.
For W., that may suggest down and to the left as well.


I will bring it and anything else I might have in tomorrow that I think you
can use.  I will leave my sleeping bag in the car though.

	From:  Kori Loibl                           11/01/2000 04:19 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Camping material

I am going up somewhere near Austin.  Do you think it would be a possibility
to borrow the backpack?  We're only going to be up there overnight so I
shouldn't need to pack that much, besides I can't carry that much anyway.


Below is the information regarding the meetings in Sacramento on Wed., May 9

Please have Greg go to our lobbyist's offices for the pre-meeting located at:

Scott & Hedy Govenar
Governmental Advocates
1127   11th Street
Suite 400
Sacramento, CA  95814

916-448-8240

11:00 am  Pre-meeting w/ Greg Whalley, Steve Kean, Jeff Dasovich, Sandi
McCubbin, possibly Richard Sanders,   possibly Michael Tribolet (via phone)

1:00 pm Mtg at Gov. Davis' office


Attached is a draft template for the Schedule and Paragraph 13 of a ISDA
Master Agreement to be use by hedge funds.  The document has been reviewed by
Cadwalader and contains a significantly enlarged range of representations and
covenants of both the hedge fund and the investment manager.  I have not
included in this draft the concept of an investment manager letter which was
suggested by Cadwalader and which can be used when the investment manager
does not agree to be a party to the ISDA Master Agreement.   I would
appreciate it if each of you would take a look at the document and provide me
with any comments you have.  I am meeting with David Mitchell of Cadwalader
on Monday of next week.  I also plan to walk through the base document with
Caroline Abramo and the others in New York on Sunday so that they can better
understand why the ISDA for hedge funds is more complex than normal ISDAs.
Finally, I am also attaching a list that I have prepared of the major changes
that have been made to the standard ISDA to create the hedge fund template.
Thanks.

Frank


yes, i got the fax.  what are you interested in doing?

	RusAmArts@aol.com
	01/31/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: jshankm@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rina Kirshner

JUST WANTED TO CHECK WHETHER YOUR RECEIVED MY FAX YESTERDAY.  PLEASE LET ME
KNOW.
REGARDS,
RINA


Please forward to me your anticipated schedules for the week of  November
13th,
preferably by end of business, Friday, November 10th.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


We have 200,000 mmbtu/day of "Block II" capacity available through May 31, 2006. It is labeled "Block II" because PG&E owns recall rights on the entire block through 12/31/2005.  The ROFR rights that go with this capacity add a tremendous amount of value (i.e. market rates with short term commitment vs. 15 - 20 year obligation of new build)

Capacity currently has access to all supply basins. However, the current FERC proceedings on receipt point reallocations will probably result in a supply split of 60% San Juan and 40% Permian.

Rates for the capacity and my Duke proposal are attached.

Please call if you have any questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
05:33 PM ---------------------------

	From:  William Kelly                           03/13/2000 01:43 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

We have room EB3014 from 3 - 4 pm on Wednesday.

WK


IMqasqas@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 16:00-17:00 in the January 11,
2002 Real-Time Market.

Prices in the January 12, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

Ibrahim Mqasqas,
Market Monitoring and Performance,
NYISO


I mean make the move to the US. Unless you teally believe that you can pull off Richard's project which sounds huge.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042908.txt


plz call. re: phil harris of PJM is on my panel today.  want to discuss.
415.782.7822.  thx, jeff


I've never heard from the dude.  I may send him a voicemail.


Roofing Company Damage Claim - 281-485-6466

CNH Roofing
Steve  -


There are a variety of CAs with U.S. Duke Energy entities.

Mary J. Heinitz has provided me with a list of these which I'll forward to
Mark for his consideration under the cover of a separate email.

Thanks, Edmund.

John Metzler
03/03/2000 02:27 PM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Indicative request to buy

Edmund,

Please review the CA implications, as stated below.

Thanks
John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Metzler/LON/ECT on 03/03/2000 14:26
---------------------------

Tomas Valnek
03/03/2000 13:29
To: Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Indicative request to buy

---------------------- Forwarded by Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT on 03/03/2000 13:30
---------------------------
From: Rod Nelson on 02/03/2000 10:01 CST
To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Indicative request to buy

Unfortunately, it's not quite that simple.  Duke Energy Trading & Marketing
is a marketing sub and does not prepare separate financials.  The S&P rating
is based on an implied guaranty from Duke Energy.  Legal would also need to
review this counterparty from the standpoint of confidentiality agreement
violations.

Also, as a trading counterparty, Sempra Energy Trading is not authorized for
credit derivative trading, because the existing guaranty does not explicitly
cover this type of transaction.  If Sempra wishes to transact out of this
entity, we can look into amending the guaranty to cover this product.  This
will require legal efforts and approval.

Rod

Tomas Valnek
03/02/2000 08:36 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Indicative request to buy

Both of  these entities have an E-rating of 3. Any issues?

Tomas

---------------------- Forwarded by Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT on 02/03/2000 14:36
---------------------------

John Metzler
01/03/2000 15:41
To: Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Indicative request to buy

Reference Name:  Duke Energy Trading & Marketing (sub of Duke energy -- he
claims they have their own debt)
Counterparty:   Sempara Energy Trading
Term:    2 years
Notional Amount:  $2 million (I made that up)

John


Below is some information regarding a Silicon Valley Technology Conference
taking place in mid-November. A discount rate is being offered to Haas
students as described below.

***************************************************

I really hope that the students and alums take advantage of this year's
conference. We will be having many companies that will be hiring, and
there are various events that will be presenting difference aspects
of technology.

    You will be able to find more information through the following
link,
http://www.siliconindia.com/events/

The pricing is as follows:

STUDENTS:
conference/banquet: $170/student
conference: $100/student
*students will need to fax us their id cards for verification

ALUMS/OTHERS:
conference/banquet: $245/per.
conference: $145/per

   This offer isn't on the site yet, so it would be best to give
me a call @ (510) 795-7875 x117. The registration will be done over
the phone and will take 2 minutes.

If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to
give me a call.

Divya


Susan, Attached is a description of the Gallup Facilities which should be
attached as Exhibit A to the Gallup O&M Agreement.  This was prepared from
information forwarded by Enron Engineering & Construction Company.  Let me
know if you have any questions.

Thanks very much for your help and short turnaround on the amendments Friday.


Carol:

On item no. 1, as you and I just confirmed with Michelle Bruce, the $958,000 owed by Vitol to EGLI due on 11/29/01 has not been paid. We are pulling the sale confirmation to see what the payment terms are. I have left a voice mail for Tom Moran who was travelling to NY today to learn where the l/c is so it can be reviewed for drawing requirements. We'll have to revisit about this on Wednesday, Dec 26 assuming we hear back from Tom.

Is there anyone else from Credit who can get us access to the l/c?

Alan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa; Murphy, Harlan; Bradford, William S.; Rohauer, Tanya
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara; Sager, Elizabeth; Clemons, Amy; Reeves, Leslie; Aronowitz, Alan; Reasoner, Monica
Subject:	Summary of LC Issues
Importance:	High

Here is where I understand things stand based on our discussions this morning:

1.	Vitol SA - Tom Moran sent an e-mail to Mark Leskowitz asking if Vitol has paid Enron.  I have not heard from Mark or Tom.  The LC expires on 12/28.

2.	El Paso - I just sent an e-mail summarizing the netting situation.  If the netting was proper then our only grounds for drawing is failure to renew the LC.  We sent them a letter yesterday about this.  Credit was going to contact them.  We can draw as early as next Wednesday.

3.	Great Bay - same as El Paso absent the netting issue.

4.	LG&E Energy Marketing - they owe us  a payment next Wednesday.  We will wait to see if they have paid and if they haven't we can declare them in default and draw.  If they have, we can draw based on a failure to renew the LC.

5.	Enserco - I will draft for Monica a follow up letter to send to them.  Credit will begin calculating Exposure/termination Amounts in anticipation of a termination as of Thursday, December 27th.  The letter today will give them until Wednesday to renew.

6.	Niagra Mohawk/ENA, Metromedia energy/ENA, Simpson Tacoma/ENA, The Energy Authority/ENA, Energy Production/ENA, Rising Star Energy LLC/ENA - I am waiting on payment history info from Leslie to see if we have any right to draw.   Could someone in credit confirm that we are in-the-money on all of these?

7.	City of Santa Clara - Harlan to send out default notice.

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving the following hours in the September 20, 2001
Real-Time Market per ECA 20010908B to verify prices:

HQ:   8:00-9:00 and 22:00
NE:   8:00-9:00 and 22:00
OH:   8:00-9:00 and 22:00
PJM:  0:00-5:00, 8:00-9:00, and 22:00

All other prices in the September 20, 2001 Real-Time Market are correct.
Prices in the September 21, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Today, Friday, Gary Fergus of the Brobeck firm and I met with Attny. Harvey
Morris of the CPUC to negotiate an extension of time for responding to the
five subpoenas issued to Enron affiliates and Portland General.   We
negotiated both an extension for initial responses (two weeks) plus an
opportunity to submit a proposal for a significant reduction in the scope of
the request for production of documents.   This will include a further
extension for other documents that are to be produced, as well as a
reservation of rights to object to the production of other documents.  We
are working in close contact with Richard Sanders and the EPMI legal team in
Portland on further refining both responses and potential objections.

However, in light of recent communications between the Governor's office and
senior Enron officials, and the prospect of additional such communications,
Both Gary and I wanted to report an unusual aspect of the negotiation with
the CPUC.   At the beginning of the meeting, as we were indicating the
overall burden of the request, the CPUC attorney indicated the extreme
pressure the Commission was under to "get to the bottom" of what was
happening in the California power markets.  He also recited that "many
parties have pledged their cooperation in this investigation to the
Governor".  He then proceeded to state that parties who delayed providing
responses and raised objections to the requests for production instead of
cooperating would "be placed on a list of non-cooperative parties" which
would be made available to the Governor and legislators and that such
parties would have to bear the consequences of such actions.

This rather explicit threat is, in my experience, unprecedented at the CPUC.
I also know the attorney in question well enough to know that he would never
invoke political reprisals on his own, and was obviously instructed to do so
by CPUC Pres. Lynch or her senior staff.  Both Gary Fergus and I responded
that such a threat was both improper and disturbing for a party simply
trying to exercise its legitimate rights to adjudicate burdensome discovery
requests, but there was no attempt to withdraw the threat.  This comment
speaks volumes about the pressure which the CPUC President feels to achieve
a politically acceptable result in this matter.  Those senior Enron
officials in communication with the Governor should be made aware of this
incident.

Mike Day


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 12:28 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 05/04/2001 05:26:14 PM
To:	"Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject:	Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp050701.pdf


Vince,

I got the zipped version fine.  Thanks  The only outstanding items relate
to the complete references for your papers (the book publisher and dates).
I spoke with Shirley this morning and she is tracing this down for me.

I re-read the Gas Market paper segment on the take-or-pay contracts and
corrected my "oversight".  By the end of the day I hope to have all the
corrections that you gave me incorporated in the manuscript.  We will make
them on the galley pages of the article when it arrives.

thanks again for all your help.

John

p.s. I also spoke with Mary Joyce (she returned my earlier call a week ago
when I was trying to ask Cindy something).  All is well.  At 10:15 AM
2/5/01 -0600, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>HTML version of Enron article:
>
>
>Vince
>
>(See attached file: b3719001.htm)(See attached file: b3719003.htm)(See
>attached file: b3719004.htm)(See attached file: b3719005.htm)(See attached
>file: b3719006.htm)(See attached file: b3719007.htm)(See attached file:
>b3719008.htm)(See attached file: b3719009.htm)(See attached file:
>b3719010.htm)
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 02/04/2001 06:37:47 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Latest revision
>
>Vince,
>
>I have made bold face edits to the attached document.  I still have two
>edits to make but am concerned that you were not reading the most recent
>version.  Sorry for any confusion but the editor doesn't use the edit
>function in word so I have ended up making edits on new versions of the
>paper.
>
>I still haven't made the change regarding the take-or-pay problem (I left
>that paper at home in my briefcase and will make the change tomorrow
>morning).  Also, I haven't added anything regarding the conflict that arose
>over pay for new hires nor have I received the Business Week e-mail from
>you.
>
>However, if the paper looks ok to Mark Palmer we can make these minor edits
>on the galley pages of the article.
>
>thanks
>
>john
>
>p.s. i am very disappointed about the scheduling conflict you have on Feb
>23rd.  you will be greatly missed but i certainly understand.
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719001.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719003.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719004.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719005.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719006.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719007.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719008.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719009.htm"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\b3719010.htm"
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


- ENRON TERMINATION 111400_.doc


What is your offer on marcus robinson?