"Oil" means crude off, condensate and other liquid hydrocarbons meeting the
quality standards and specifications set forth in Article VI hereof.  also,
do we even need this definition?
*****************************************
I don't think so--John was going to do a search.

"Payment Date" means, for or with respect to any Month, the last LIBOR
Business Day of the next following Month.  For example, February 28, 2001 is
the Payment Date for the Month of January 2001.  i think this reads better if
we say:
"Payment Date" means, for or with respect to any Month, the last LIBOR
Business Day of the Month following the production Month.  For example,
February 28, 2001 is the Payment Date for the production Month of January
2001.
*****************************************
 Read Section 8.1 where the term is used for payment--it works as is.

Section 3.3. Enforcement of Production Payment Documents.  Seller shall take
all actions as may be appropriate to abide by the provisions of the
Production Payment Documents and enforce the provisions of the Production
Payment Documents against the Producer.  Seller shall not amend any
Production Payment Document in any material respect without the consent of
Buyer.

once again, i think this should state, that consent is only needed when
amending something that will change any of the items tied to the Confirm -
term, price, volume...  we should be able to change capex, or even the oil
vols... w/o consent.
*****************************************
As long as we are GP of Brazos or the Servicer, this is OK--we can advise
them informally--"prior written" has been deleted and ENA will not care
except as to the irrelevant revisions--but if we're removed as GP or
Servicer, this will be better protection for ENA.

Section 4.2. Scheduling.  Not less than fifteen (15) Days prior to the first
Day of each Month during the Term of a Transaction, Seller will notify Buyer
of the daily quantities of Gas that Seller expects to be available for
delivery to Buyer hereunder at each Delivery Point during such Month. No
later than twenty-four (24) hours prior to Buyer's Transporter's nomination
deadline for such Month, Buyer agrees to schedule for delivery at each
Delivery Point commencing on the first Day of such Month the quantities of
Gas which Seller expects to deliver in kind to Buyer at each Delivery Point
during such Month pursuant to this Agreement.  Although Buyer recognizes that
the quantity at each Delivery Point may fluctuate in accordance with the
provisions of the Production Payment Documents, Seller agrees to provide
Buyer immediately upon receipt by Seller a copy of any notice or agreement to
change any rate of production or Delivery Point under the terms of the
applicable Production Payment Documents. make this 3 Business Days
*****************************************
OK

Section 7.1. Price.  Buyer shall pay Seller for all Gas delivered hereunder
each Month in compliance with Sections 4.1, 6.1 and 6.4 by making the
calculations described below for each Transaction (after disregarding any
Measurement and Allocation Inaccuracies), adding together for all
Transactions all amounts deemed owed by Buyer to Seller and by Seller to
Buyer during such Month, and paying to Seller the resulting net amount deemed
owed by Buyer to Seller on the Payment Date for such Month as provided in
Section 8.1 (provided that if such resulting net amount is owed by Seller to
Buyer then Seller shall pay the same to Buyer):
i need to think about this, but i think in reality, ENA will pay to Brazos
each confirm/deal separately.  but i think this is such a small, moot point
that i won't pursue.
*****************************************
OK.

Section 7.1. Price.  under b: refers to Index Price - the confirm/transaction
agrmt calls this the Spot Price.  this needs to jive.
*****************************************
We're changing all references to Index Price to Spot Price.

section 14.1, make me the Notices person.  fax #646.3640 &
joan.quick@enron.com
i'm not sure who you want to put for ENA - bob bowen's group?  if so, fax #
is 646.4816.
*****************************************
I think we're putting both you and Shirley in Notices.  Dan Hyvl should know
who they want for notice.

we need a transaction agreement for crescendo.
*************************
Yes, do we have one for St. Mary's?  Who prepared it?  Will they prepare the
Crescendo transaction agreement? We need to make sure they work with this
Master.

*****************************************
re the transaction agreement for st mary's [which is attached].  we need to
specify somewhere in that agrmt that that is the st. mary's deal... per the
confirm definition [see below].  so that one can figure out which confirm
goes with which deal.
*************************
It's not attached, but yes, you're right--that would be very helpful.

"Confirmation" means, with respect to a Transaction, a confirmation letter or
statement between Buyer and Seller, setting forth for such Transaction the
applicable Effective Date, Contract Price, Index Price, Delivery Points, and
Scheduled Amounts and a reference to the related Conveyance

*****************************************
also re the transaction agreement for st mary's, do we want the MaxDQ to
state that?  what happens if 100% of the gas is down on day 5, and they want
to make it all up on day 6.  i don't think we s/b limited to 25%.  ALSO, the
agrmt refers to the enfolio agmt, which needs to be changed.
************************
We don't have a MaxDQ any longer.  The transaction agreement probably needs
to be redone.  I don't remember seeing it, but I may have.  Please forward it.

Thanks much.

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

	Joan Quick
	12/24/00 05:49 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Otis/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Master Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement

"Oil" means crude off, condensate and other liquid hydrocarbons meeting the
quality standards and specifications set forth in Article VI hereof.  also,
do we even need this definition?
*****************************************
"Payment Date" means, for or with respect to any Month, the last LIBOR
Business Day of the next following Month.  For example, February 28, 2001 is
the Payment Date for the Month of January 2001.  i think this reads better if
we say:
"Payment Date" means, for or with respect to any Month, the last LIBOR
Business Day of the Month following the production Month.  For example,
February 28, 2001 is the Payment Date for the production Month of January
2001.
*****************************************
Section 3.3. Enforcement of Production Payment Documents.  Seller shall take
all actions as may be appropriate to abide by the provisions of the
Production Payment Documents and enforce the provisions of the Production
Payment Documents against the Producer.  Seller shall not amend any
Production Payment Document in any material respect without the consent of
Buyer.

once again, i think this should state, that consent is only needed when
amending something that will change any of the items tied to the Confirm -
term, price, volume...  we should be able to change capex, or even the oil
vols... w/o consent.
*****************************************
Section 4.2. Scheduling.  Not less than fifteen (15) Days prior to the first
Day of each Month during the Term of a Transaction, Seller will notify Buyer
of the daily quantities of Gas that Seller expects to be available for
delivery to Buyer hereunder at each Delivery Point during such Month. No
later than twenty-four (24) hours prior to Buyer's Transporter's nomination
deadline for such Month, Buyer agrees to schedule for delivery at each
Delivery Point commencing on the first Day of such Month the quantities of
Gas which Seller expects to deliver in kind to Buyer at each Delivery Point
during such Month pursuant to this Agreement.  Although Buyer recognizes that
the quantity at each Delivery Point may fluctuate in accordance with the
provisions of the Production Payment Documents, Seller agrees to provide
Buyer immediately upon receipt by Seller a copy of any notice or agreement to
change any rate of production or Delivery Point under the terms of the
applicable Production Payment Documents. make this 3 Business Days
*****************************************
Section 7.1. Price.  Buyer shall pay Seller for all Gas delivered hereunder
each Month in compliance with Sections 4.1, 6.1 and 6.4 by making the
calculations described below for each Transaction (after disregarding any
Measurement and Allocation Inaccuracies), adding together for all
Transactions all amounts deemed owed by Buyer to Seller and by Seller to
Buyer during such Month, and paying to Seller the resulting net amount deemed
owed by Buyer to Seller on the Payment Date for such Month as provided in
Section 8.1 (provided that if such resulting net amount is owed by Seller to
Buyer then Seller shall pay the same to Buyer):
i need to think about this, but i think in reality, ENA will pay to Brazos
each confirm/deal separately.  but i think this is such a small, moot point
that i won't pursue.
*****************************************
Section 7.1. Price.  under b: refers to Index Price - the confirm/transaction
agrmt calls this the Spot Price.  this needs to jive.
*****************************************

section 14.1, make me the Notices person.  fax #646.3640 &
joan.quick@enron.com
i'm not sure who you want to put for ENA - bob bowen's group?  if so, fax #
is 646.4816.
*****************************************
we need a transaction agreement for crescendo.

*****************************************
re the transaction agreement for st mary's [which is attached].  we need to
specify somewhere in that agrmt that that is the st. mary's deal... per the
confirm definition [see below].  so that one can figure out which confirm
goes with which deal.

"Confirmation" means, with respect to a Transaction, a confirmation letter or
statement between Buyer and Seller, setting forth for such Transaction the
applicable Effective Date, Contract Price, Index Price, Delivery Points, and
Scheduled Amounts and a reference to the related Conveyance

*****************************************
also re the transaction agreement for st mary's, do we want the MaxDQ to
state that?  what happens if 100% of the gas is down on day 5, and they want
to make it all up on day 6.  i don't think we s/b limited to 25%.  ALSO, the
agrmt refers to the enfolio agmt, which needs to be changed.

*****************************************

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 12/24/2000 05:00 PM
---------------------------

Teresa G Bushman
12/21/2000 04:22 PM
To: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Otis/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Master Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 04:26 PM -----

	rainj@tklaw.com
	12/21/2000 03:04 PM

		 To: rmiles@bracepatt.com, cozdogan@bracepatt.com,
james.r.allred@bankofamerica.com, tracey.s.barclay@bankofamerica.com,
richard.stein@bankofamerica.com, patricia.dundee@rbos.com,
nora.dobin@enron.com, tim.proffitt@enron.com, shearerr@tklaw.com,
hardiet@tklaw.com, Chris.Herron@enron.com, Stanley.Farmer@enron.com,
Teresa.G.Bushman@enron.com, mary.cook@enron.com, dan.j.hyvl@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Master Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement

Attached are clean and marked versions of our proposed natural gas purchase
and sale agreement.  This has not been fully reviewed by Enron and remains
subject to change in all respects.  The marked attachment shows changes
from the crude oil agreement sent earlier today.

(See attached file: Gas Ver 2 marked from Oil Ver 6.doc)
(See attached file: Gas Ver 2 marked from Oil Ver 6.wpd)

(See attached file: Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement Ver 2
clean.doc)     (See attached file: Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement
Ver 2 clean.wpd)

John W. Rain
Thompson & Knight L.L.P.
1700 Pacific Ave.
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: 214.969.1644 (Dallas)
Phone: 713.653.8887 (Houston)
Fax:       214.880.3150

This email and any attachments to it may contain legally privileged
information or confidential information, which are not intended to be
disclosed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please do
not read or print any attachments or forward or copy this email or any
attachments.  Instead, please permanently delete this email and any
attachments and notify the sender of his mistake.  Thank you very much.

 - Gas Ver 2 marked from Oil Ver 6.doc
 - Gas Ver 2 marked from Oil Ver 6.wpd
 - Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement Ver 2 clean.doc
 - Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement Ver 2 clean.wpd


Music can be started by clicking on the sound icon.
      To stop music, right click and end show :  ) Heather


Go anywhere fun?  Please make me jealous!  Things are good - Vanny came back Saturday and started her new gig today.  So, I think a celebration is in order sometime this week.

K.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heintzelman, Peter
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S.
Subject:	RE:

Sorry I missed it, I was on vacation.  How are you?  PJH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S.
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 4:25 PM
To:	Heintzelman, Peter
Subject:

some of us are going to the front porch in about 5 minutes.  c'mon over.  and tell others.

K.


Bob -

My initial response is that the amendment can be provided.  I am not sure,
however, that we satisfy the rationale behind the collateral/lc by doing
this.  Remember, until the counterparty actually confirms with Enron (or
performs the transaction), Enron does not maintain any direct contractual
relationship with the Counterparty.  All Enron has is a confirmation from the
broker, the party with whom we have contracted through the BrokerClient
product.  In this situation, both the broker and Enron are really in the same
position as if the transaction were a telephone trade by a broker.

I will give this a bit more thought and discuss possible options with Mark.
Maybe it is as simple as obtaining a document from the counterparty under
which they acknowledge (1) the broker is authorized to act on its behalf, (2)
the relationship is truly one of agent and principal such that the actions of
the broker (e.g., transacting online) are really the actions of the
counterparty and (3) the counterparty agrees to be liable to Enron as if the
counterparty had, itself, performed the transaction online.  The last point
could be used to tie any breach of a transaction to the master
agreement/GTC's between Enron and the counterparty - the same method that is
currently employed to calculate the Liquidated Damages under the BETA.

Let's talk further next week after I have discussed this with Mark.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Bob Shults@ECT
	04/06/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg
		 cc:
		 Subject: Broker Client

Andy and I have worked to come up with a way to give the Brokers a greater
incentive to execute via Broker Client.  To date we have only had 7
executions.  4 out of the 5 Brokers have not even given us security yet and
are therefore not able to execute.   What we would like to do is draft an
amendment that would have the brokers warrant that they have confirmed with
the counterparty.  We will be willing to free them from responsibility under
the liquidated damages (assuming no fraud, misrepresentation...) once they
have confirmed each day.  We would expect them in return that the broker use
all means possible to help us get the counterparty to perform.  Andy would
like me to implement this by April 15th.  Can you draft an amendment to do
this.


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Claire:
Please include me in on the Volleyball Tourney this Friday. Thanks!
Ben


FEMALE HORMONES IN BEER

Yesterday, scientists for Health Canada suggested that men should take a
look
at their beer consumption, considering the results of a recent analysis that

revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. The theory is that
drinking
beer makes men turn into women.

To test the finding, 100 men were fed 6 pints of beer each. It was then
observed that 100% of the men gained weight, talked excessively without
making
sense, became overly emotional, couldn't drive, failed to think rationally,
argued over nothing and refused to apologize when wrong. No further testing
is
planned.


We had our daily phone call with NW.  I don't know that we really have
significant  points of disagreement.  They understand that we are working
some accounting issues, and they have a general idea of what we want to do.
I suggested that we come up with the work arounds with our accountants, and I
will think about it this weekend.  I have a couple of ideas but I really want
to mull it over.

They look forward to receiving the turbine contract.  Chris, could you
forward the draft change orders with it?

One point they raised is that they want the ability (with GE consent) to have
us refund the future payment due to GE (less 7% for time value of money),
retaining the payment obligation.  All of this is post closing.  They are
putting up a full blown parent guaranty to GE for the turbine contract, and
since the payment should only be around $4mm, that would probably be
acceptable to GE.

Keffer et al will issue revised documents tonight.  There are no calls
scheduled tomorrow or this weekend, giving everyone "quiet time" to review
the contract.  Other than the accting issues, this should be about it.

We deferred discussions about an extension until Monday.

Kay


If you receive a call for a master netting directly from a customer to which you have not been assigned  the file or contact, direct the call to Jay Williams at credit as he is the starting point.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Is everything OK?  Didn't hear from you.

	Janel Guerrero@ENRON
	07/19/2000 02:27 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi.  I'll call you tonight at home -- I've got a crisis going on with my
mother in Italy...


Suggested changes are highlighted below.

John Sherriff@ECT
04/24/2001 12:55 AM
To: (713) 529-7757, Ken Rice/Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Jeremy
Thirsk/AP/Enron@ENRON, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Raymond
Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carey
Sloan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, lkitchen@enron.co.uk
cc:

Subject: Draft Organizational Announcement about Japan

May I please have your comments if any on this draft by close of business
Wednesday.  We hope to have agreed on the Q&A's by then and to send it out
the announcement on Thursday.

John

To be sent to:  All Enron Europe, all employees in Japan,  all Global Markets
and all VPs and up around the company

Enron has established several wholesale businesses in Japan in the last year
including Metals,  Power Plant Development (via our investment in EnCom),
Coal,  LNG & Weather.   We see significant opportunities in each of these
businesses and we will continue to expand our presence in Japan in order to
capture these opportunities.  However, while Japan continues to make progress
towards a liberalized electricity market, significant barriers to power
trading remain under the current interim market structure.  Until further
tangible steps are taken to improve third party access for electricity in
Japan, we will suspend our power marketing efforts and focus on the
significant opportunities that currently exist in our other wholesale
businesses. [Any statement regarding our existing power sales commitment?]
Once the necessary regulatory changes have been completed we expect to
aggressively pursue Enron's traditional position as the leading buyer and
seller of electricity in every deregulated market.

We are making a number of organization changes in order to better align our
resources with the opportunities in the Japanese market.  [deleted text] Joe
Hirl our President of Enron Japan will move to the Global Markets group and
lead a team that will focus on developing all our Global Markets
opportunities in Japan especially Weather,  Oil,  LNG,  Coal, and
Shipping.    We expect to continue our general recruiting  of Japanese
nationals and as President of Enron Japan,  Joe will continue to provide the
overall business leadership to both recruiting and the Analyst and Associate
program in Japan.  The Finance origination team headed by Jeremy Thirsk will
continue to report to Joe and also move to Global Markets.  Our power trading
group led by Morton Erik Pettersen will transition into other roles around
Enron.  The Equity/FX/Interest rate team which is a part of Global Markets
has two employees in the Tokyo office today and they expect to expand their
efforts throughout the year.

The EnCom group, which is our power plant development business (with minority
partners) and headed by Carey Sloan will continue its efforts in developing
power plants in Japan.  We are pleased with the progress we are making on a
number of sites and EnCom will continue to report to the Enron Europe Office
of the Chairman.

Our Metals team headed by Kazunari Sugimoto will continue to report through
Enron Metals in London.

By May we expect Enron Credit to have two to three employees in Tokyo pursing
the Credit Derivative business.  These employees remain in  Enron Credit , a
part of Enron Europe.

EBS has two employees headed by Jim Weisser and this team expects to expand
by year end.

The Industrial Markets team also expects to have two employees in the Tokyo
office in the next couple of months.

In the last seven months the commercial support services for Japan have been
transitioned to London for support and this is not changing.  Jane McBride
heads the legal team and will continue to functionally report  to Mark Evans,
General Counsel in London.   The RAC function will continue to report to Ted
Murphy, head of RAC for Enron Europe.   The Risk Management and Accounting
team is headed by Jan-Erland Bekeng will continue to functionally report to
Fernley Dyson in London.  The  IT, HR,  Tax and real estate teams will also
continue to functionally report to London.

Nick O'Day who heads the Public Affairs group (Government & Regulatory
Affairs and the Public Relations) in Japan will report to the Enron Europe
Office of the Chair with a Public Relations functional reporting to Jackie
Gentle in London and a Government Affairs functional reporting to Rick
Shapiro in Houston.   We anticipate that his team's efforts will be primarily
directed to supporting the EnCom power plant development team but they will
also continue to provide support for Global Markets, EBS & Industrial Markets.

We have already made considerable progress in breaking into the Japanese
markets across a wide range of Enron businesses and we anticipate that this
will provide significant profit growth for years to come. Through these
current changes we can demonstrate our ability to be flexible and target our
resources where they will realise the most immediate value for the company.


Please keep Mike and I informed.  If there is anything we can do to help,
please let us know.  They should be a very important customer for us.  John
Nowlan also has info on them.  Thanks.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 09:33 AM -----

	experience Enron@ENRON
	Sent by: Carrie A Robert@ENRON
	01/29/2001 09:23 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: RE: Feedback on Enron Guest speaker for Global operations meeting
DOW

Below is feedback from Dow on the presentation that Mark Palmer did on 1/24
to Dow's global operations leaders.  It was a big success.  Mark will be
debriefing Jeff Skilling on the presentation and what they discussed.  Jeff
Skilling is to meet with Mike Parker, President and CEO Dow Chemical in late
April to discuss how Enron and Dow can work more closely together.  Let me
know if you need  further information from me.

Thank you.
Carrie
---------------------- Forwarded by Carrie A Robert/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001
09:17 AM ---------------------------

	"Lamm, Rudolf (RL)" <RLLamm@dow.com>
	01/25/2001 01:19 PM

		 To: "'Carrie.A.Robert@enron.com'" <Carrie.A.Robert@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Feedback on Enron Guest speaker for Global operations meeting
DOW

Dear Carrie,

first of all thanks for your patience and support !

Mark was "worldclass" ! After the meeting we collected feedback, where we
asked the participants for the presentations which exceeded the
expectations....and "Enron" was clearly number one !

So it was the subject itself, but also Mark as a speaker ! Your choice was
absolutely to the "point" !

Our company has agressive goals in terms of revenue growth...and all these
guys, who were in this room have somehow to do with it.
I think the Enron case just opened up a field of ideas and thinking to break
with our traditional business frame.

So it was exactly the right time.

Again, I can only say thank you for a great presentation and a great speaker
!

Please let Mark know, how well he did !

best regards

Rudi

-----Original Message-----
From: Carrie.A.Robert@enron.com [mailto:Carrie.A.Robert@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Lamm, Rudolf (RL)
Subject: Feedback on Enron Guest speaker for Global operations meeting
DOW

Rudolf - I hope the Dow Chemical Operations Leadership Conference went
well.   Thank you for inviting Enron as a guest speaker.  Please let me
know if the presentation and Mark Palmer met your audience expectations.

Thank you for your feedback.
Carrie


Hey girl,

I'm really in about the same position I was in on Monday.  I've talked to the
people in the office and they promise me they are still interested in having
me up there.  But HR seems to be impeding the process at this point.  I'm
just waiting for them to get back to me.  And the VP's son had surgery this
week and apparently it was much more serious than they expected, so she's
been unavailable all week.  She's supposed to be back in the office on Monday
so hopefully she'll shake things up a little.  I definitely won't leave
without saying goodbye.  We'll have to get together for lunch once I have
some definite plans.

Talk to ya later...Enjoy your day off.
Robin

Alicia Perkins@EES
02/09/2001 01:14 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chicago

Hey Robin-

        I was just wondering how the plans were coming along for Chicago.
Don't run out of here without saying bye to me, OK!   What date are you
planning on starting up there?

Talk to ya later.  (but not Monday at Spanish class because I am taking the
day off)
Alicia


U.S. Utility and Non-Utility Power Directories

Click Here To Download Order Form and Additional Information

http://www.pmaconference.com/powerdirectories.pdf

SPECIAL PACKAGE PRICE:  Normally $895 each, get BOTH Directories AND a full year of Merchant Power Monthly (normally $295) for only $1090!    Act Now!

2000 US ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM

More than 8,000 listings including: name, address, phone, fax, email, website address, key personnel, brief company synopsis, financial and operating information, generating stations, services provided, sales and usage, plant details, key articles, and much more!

Listed by: Holding companies, investor-owned electric utilities, Municipal and other publicly owned utilities, rural electric cooperatives, Federal, state and district systems, associations, councils and power pools, Canadian utilities, regulatory agencies, Indexes (company, geographic, personnel)

CD-ROM Features: Generate reports, pull mailing lists, analyze data, and produce queries.

2001 U.S. Non-Utility Power Directory on CD-ROM

This revised and updated directory includes more than 2700 non-utility plant listings, including owners and operators. Detailed information (where available) of each plant includes contacts, address, phone and fax numbers, installed capacity, year installed, number of employees, net generation, number of units, prime mover, fuel type and detailed hydro attributes.

Company information includes company name, contact, address, phone and fax numbers, website and revenues (if available).

This directory is fully exportable. Each CD includes the following formats: MSAccess, MSExcel, Dbase and DOS-Text.

Click Here To Download Order Form and Additional Information

http://www.pmaconference.com/powerdirectories.pdf

This email has been sent to lindy.donoho@enron.com,
 by PowerMarketers.com.

Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=lindy.donoho@enron.com

View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

Powered by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:56 AM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	02/08/2001 05:01 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>,
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Mike
Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Robert
Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Andy
Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug
Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>
		 Subject: Governor's Executive Orders

Attached are the Governor's Executive Orders and letters to FERC and Bush
signed today, in one document.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - EXECUTIVE ORDERs.doc


Thought you might be interested in this feedback from a recent conference.

Regards,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kabel, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Thomas Sfikas/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON; Steel Distribution
Cc: McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond
Subject: RE: Steel Stradegies Conference - NYC 06/20/01

I am in complete agreement with the below (except I think the applause for
our demise was, unfortunately, rather more aggressive!!). This was my first
exposure to the non-European Steel players and found myself quite amazed at
the few number of "public" advocates that we had at the conference in
consideration of what we are offering.  The one-on-one contact with the
attendees was completely the opposite.  We talked with a broad and numerous
set of people who, coming to the booth as sceptics (they think that were are
in the market just to grab the physical business), left with cards in hand
and future risk management meetings in mind.  Big buyers (eg GE, Emerson) and
consultants (eg Accenture, McK, etc) were particularly receptive and should
be courted as public advocates for what we are doing.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Thomas Sfikas/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Thomas+20Sfikas_ENRON+40enronXgate+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: 21 June 2001 17:05
To: Steel Distribution
Cc: McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond
Subject: Steel Stradegies Conference - NYC 06/20/01

Yesterday, during the Panel V discussion, "Why Have Steel Middlemen Gone From
The Most Threatened To Best Positioned", we got some direct feedback on the
perception of Enron in the marketplace. The participants were, Fred Lamesh
CEO of Trademarked Inc., Michael Siegel, CEO of Olympic Steel, Bud Siegel,
CEO of Russell Metals, and Wilfred von Bulow, CEO of Ferrostaal Inc.; the
moderator was Peter Marcus, Managing Partners of World Steel Dynamics. Each
participant gave a brief speech about their respective companies which was
followed by a Q&A session. The first mention of Enron was during Michael
Siegal's speech in which he mentioned that Olympic Steel had "sold material
to Enron" and that "Enron has recognized that steel is a commodity and for
many countries represents currency."  Michael was clearly proud of his
transactions with Enron and agreed with our view of steel as a commodity.
The real feedback came during the Q&A. Peter Marcus posted the following
question to the panelists. "What about Enron? With their plan of entering the
market with a number of hubs across the country, stocking material, with
large scale distribution on a "spot" basis. Will this business model work? Do
they offer any real value or not?"
Following are the respective responses as best I can reiterate from my notes
( please don't quote me on this):
Fred Lamesh, TradeArbed: "The concept is too new to make a judgment yet on
credibility. Enron has certainly been successful in the past and should not
be discounted. I question their ability to procure material at competitive
enough levels to make this a profitable venture but there may be some value
in their delivery of financial instruments."
Michael Siegal, Olympic Steel: "Enron certainly has the financial means to
withstand a "break even" business to support their financial instruments. At
this point, we view them as just another entity in the market and until we
can evaluate their performance, it is difficult to determine value. I am
concerned though that they will prop up under capitalized distributors and
allow them to operate despite mismanagement. One interesting and unique
concept that they are trying to bring to the industry though is the idea that
a contract is a contract, with liquidated damages for non performance. That
would certainly be change (sporadic laughter among the crowd)."
Bud Siegel, Russell Metals: "I addressed the Enron question last night during
dinner and was told that I was abusive to the young lady from Enron (Tammy, I
later understood that you had a less than cordial conversation with Bud the
previous evening). I am calling Enron the "Hunts of the steel business" with
their idea of buying up the market. The whole concept is like Swiss cheese.
You can not put up depots, buy from steel mills, and expect to sell the same
steel to distributors cheaper than the mills themselves. The logistical
expenses alone guarantee failure. You can not be everything to everyone.
Considering the current state of under financing in this industry, they will
inevitably end up financing bankrupt people and take credit hits. Without
immediate success, Enron has been known to exist markets quickly in the past,
and I believe they will be gone within the year."(some sporadic applause)
Wilfried von Bulow, Ferrostaal: "Right now they are just another additional
player in the market. They will certainly have an impact but it would not be
pragmatic to make a judgment yet on their ability to succeed. Let's watch it
and see if there is any value to what they are trying to bring to the market."
It appears to me that the focus on Enron in the market right now continues to
be more on the physical aspects of what we are doing and not enough emphasis
or credibility is being given to the financial tools we are bringing. It is
obviously very easy to poke holes in a concept of trading large volumes of
physical steel on a "spot" basis through the set up of physical hubs around
the country. In the end, the only way we will be successful will be by
bringing liquidity to our index through financial instruments. We need to
focus more on educating customers about our financial tools, developing our
curve, and bringing players to the market.


OK, please ticket these.  I'll send Susan's $200 Travel Certificate to the
3rd floor like we talked about.  Thanks for your help!  :-)

Laura Osman <laura.osman@travelpark.com> on 10/10/2000 12:00:12 PM
To: "'DENISE.LAGESSE@ENRON.COM'" <DENISE.LAGESSE@ENRON.COM>
cc:

Subject: Review and approve tickets for trip to Los Angeles

Please let me know when you are ready to issue these tickets.

                                          LINDBERG/CRAIG
                                          EB 4788
                                          YELLOW COPY TO LAURA
  ENRON CORP
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002

  DATE:  OCT 10 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27OCT HOUSTON TX     LOS ANGELES CA 940A    1112A
CO 1715    B          FRI   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 6
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:32 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 757-200/300
                            SEAT 31E NO SMOKING CONFIRMED LINDBERG/CRAIG(

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  29OCT LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     610P    1121P
CO 1016    B          SUN   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL 6     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:11 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-800
                            SEAT 26E NO SMOKING CONFIRMED LINDBERG/CRAIG(

MISCELLANEOUS         28DEC HOUSTON TX
                      THU   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/IY879D

LINDBERG/CRAIG  S0C0366R1116

**********************************************
THE FEE FOR THIS PERSONAL TRAVEL IS CHARGED BY ENRON CORP.
**********************************************
                                                   SALES AGT: LO/ZPFO76

                                          SCOTT/SUSAN
                                          EB 4788
                                          INTEROFFICE ETKT CONFIRMATION
  ENRON CORP                              YELLOW COPY TO LAURA
  ENRON CORP
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002

  DATE:  OCT 10 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27OCT HOUSTON TX     LOS ANGELES CA 940A    1112A
CO 1715    B          FRI   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 6
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:32 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 757-200/300
                            SEAT 31D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED SCOTT/SUSAN(IDS

CAR                   27OCT BUDGET                 LOS ANGELES CA
                      29OCT CONFIRMATION: 34107008US5
                            TELEPHONE: 310-642-4533
                            STANDARD CONVERT AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD57.95DY UNL .00MI 3DY BASE RATE
                            173.85 UNL
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
                            DROP-OFF: LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
       ONE DAY RENTAL CHARGE IF NOT CANCEL 24HRS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL.

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  29OCT LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     610P    1121P
CO 1016    B          SUN   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL 6     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:11 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-800
                            SEAT 26D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED SCOTT/SUSAN(IDS

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/IY879D

SCOTT/SUSAN  S0C0366R1116

ASSISTANT - DENISE LAGESSE - 853-6704
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS: IN U.S 800 523-6586/INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*******************************************
**********************************************
THE FEE FOR THIS PERSONAL TRAVEL IS CHARGED BY ENRON CORP.
**********************************************


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:37:23 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

linda.stepenovitch@bankofamerica.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain bankofamerica.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


PROCESSING

None

TENDERED

02-062	Questar	Eff 1/1/02		Interconnect & Operating K	  	EXECUTED

25374	Oneok		Extend to 3/31/02	12,000/d	Panhdle to Beav #1	EXECUTED

26471	PPL		Eff RR In-Service	20,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27642	Calpine	Eff RR In-Service	40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27803	BP		1/1/03-12/31/04	25,000/d	Blmfld to Needles	EXECUTED

27821	Cinergy	2/1-2/28/02		5,000/d	Cen Pool to Topock	Negotiating 2/1

27834	WGR		4/1/02-10/31/02	5,000/d	WTx Pl to PG&E Topk	EXECUTED

27835	WGR		11/02 - 12/03		10,000/d	WTx Pl to Socal	EXECUTED

27847	Tenaska	2/26/02 only		10,000/d	WTx Pl to Halley	EXECUTED

27847	Tenaska	Extend to 2/27/02	10,000/d	WTx Pl to Halley	EXECUTED


I don't believe I forwarded this to you.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 11:54
AM ---------------------------

Herman Manis
07/24/2000 10:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: VEPCO/FYI

Thanks.  I think we have alot of the same accounting issues here if the PPA
is construed to be a lease.  If it is a lease, we have similar spending and
EPC concerns as our other deals.  Do we know who the O&M contractor will be?
If ENA or affiliate, we should not take on plant risk - just make sure our
fair value O&M fee is the only amount at risk under the O&M agreement.  As of
Friday, AA told us that even in a non-offtake situation, they may say we are
in a lease if we take on plant risk through an O&M agreement.  This was new
news to us.

To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VEPCO/FYI

I'm working with the commerial team on on PPA (and associated transactions)
for Virginia Power.  The project involves the construction of  a peaker to
supply some/most of the power, with the ability to supply from the market as
well.  The plant has an 01 service date, so things are really picking up.

Matt and Herman, this is the transaction we discussed with Heather a few
weeks ago.

Items on the immediate to do list include:

Executing a land option agreement
Closing on the land (or assign to City of Rocky Mount, and let them close)
Selling/transferring the land to the City of Rocky Mount; negotiate long term
lease
Negotiating a PILOT agreement (payment in lieu of taxes) with the City
Negotiating fuel supply agreements
Selecting/contracting with EPC contractor - can it be NEPCO?
Long lead equipment purchases (?) - could be home for LM 6000's, but other
equipment may be needed
Negotiate interconnection agreement

This deal is showing a lot of life, so I thought it might be helpful to give
you a heads up.

Kay


Steve:  here's the witness list as discussed for Monday, September 11th's San
Diego hearing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
01:30 PM ---------------------------

"Black, Andy" <andy.black@mail.house.gov> on 09/08/2000 12:33:54 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: San Diego witnesses

We have not finalized who is on what panels.  Following are the 16
witnesses:

4 FERC Commissioners
Cal PUC Chair
Cal Energy Commission Chair
Cal ISO CEO
Cal PX
SDG&E
Reliant
Enron
Solar Turbines
Oracle
Jan Smutny-Jones as head of Cal Independent Energy Producers
restauranter Roy Tyler of Tyler's Taste of Texas (no, we didn't plan that)
Utility Consumers Action Network


Ashley and I need your address again and your uncles' addresses for Christmas
cards.

How is married life treating you?  Good I hope.  What are you guys doing for
Christmas?  Are your folks coming in?

We are staying in Houston.  Should be nice and quiet.  We are going to have a
few people over for new year's, but nothing special.
PL


Have you had a chance to review the positions yet??

Robin


Cindy,

Thank you for returning the message.  I did intend it for Bob
Stearns...sorry about the mix up!

As you have probably seen from our exchange of emails, Stan had asked me to
keep him apprised of any attractive investment opportunities I came across.
I took it from Stan's last message that he may or may not be interested in
Bob's fund, Sternhill, at this time but he would at least like to meet Bob
(hence the email to Bob that you received instead).  As you could see from
the email, I have asked Bob to contact Stan and to mention my name so that
you would have a reference for his call.  You should, therefore, expect Bob
to be calling (probably today) and please let Stan know that this was the
fellow I had mentioned in my message to him.

Thank you and happy holidays,

Dave Noble

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy_Stark@enron.com [mailto:Cindy_Stark@enron.com]On Behalf Of
Stanley_Horton@enron.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 7:10 AM
To: Dave Noble
Subject: RE: How's this for responsiveness?

Dave:

You sent this to Stan but it's addressed to Bob.    I have not shown this
to Stan...and will await further instructions from you.

Cindy Stark
Exec. Assistant to Stan Horton

"Dave Noble" <danoble@att.net> on 12/20/99 07:40:59 PM

To:   Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  RE: How's this for responsiveness?

Bob,

I should have checked farther down my email.  It looks like he is on the
fence but you ought to go ahead and contact him any way.  Stan runs all of
Enron's operations world wide and is a good friend.  You should be able to
reach him through Enron's main number (713-853-6161) and say that Dave
Noble
said to call when you reach him.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy_Stark@enron.com [mailto:Cindy_Stark@enron.com]On Behalf Of
Stanley_Horton@enron.com
Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 3:31 PM
To: Dave Noble
Subject: Re: How's this for responsiveness?

Dave:

Thanks for suggesting that Bob Stearns and I get together.  I think I'd
like to wait for your next fund, but feel free to give my name to Bob.

Thanks, Dave!

Stan

"Dave Noble" <danoble@att.net> on 12/17/99 10:43:12 AM

To:   Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  How's this for responsiveness?

Stan,

Per your interest in putting some money to work, we will not be raising a
new fund until next fall at the earliest but I wanted to let you know about
another situation that might be of interest to you.  A good friend and
former client at Compaq, Bob Stearns, is putting together a fund to invest
in early stage technology deals.  Bob was SVP of technology and business
development at Compaq for several years but left when the crazies took over
(all of whom got fired, I might add).  Since I value my friendships too
much, I don't generally recommend people unless I really believe in who
they
are and what they are doing.  Bob is top notch, which is why I would feel
comfortable recommending him to you and would be very pleased to introduce
you to Bob because you are top notch as well.  I thought Bob had closed his
fund already but he said he was going to have a second closing in about 30
days so there is still time to get in if you are interested.  The typical
investment is in the $500k to $1m range although I know of one person who
got in for $250k. ( I introduced him to Frevert and Rice and they have both
invested.)  Bob is still in Houston and offices over in the Galleria area.

If you would like to talk to Bob, let me know when and where you can be
reached and I will forward your information to him.

Dave


These phone moves are for positions we asked for approval for last week.

Thanks,

Morris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frausto, Ruthann
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Brassfield, Morris
Cc:	Daily, Pamela
Subject:	Need approval for phone moves

LeShawn Edwards, currently a contractor in Elaine Concklin's accounting group, has accepted a position with Barney Brasher to fill the position vacated by Vera Jones, and Elaine has hired another contractor to backfill the position LeShawn is leaving.

I need your approval to switch the telephones:

LeShawn's phone from 3AC3321 to her new location at 3AC3336
Vera Jones' old phone from 3AC3336 to 3AC3321 & reassign to new contractor

If you approve, please forward to Rod Hayslett for his approval as well.

Thank you.

Ruthann
x66538


I don't believe we need Keffer's input to process the LOI.  I can have their
power guy look at the term sheet if we think we are done with it.

From: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 12:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: TECO

Kay:

I will review your comments on the LOI.  I wanted to check with make sure
that someone at King & Spalding is reviewing the Midway term sheet along with
the LOI, so that we can send the term sheet to TECO on Monday/Tuesday.

Let me know.

Fred

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred
Cc: jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: TECO

Ben,

I made a minor adjustment to the LOI re: exclusivity.

 << File: Midway TECO LOI june 1.doc >>

Policy states that any time we sign up to exclusivity we are supposed to get
it approved by Mark Metts, Tim Detmering and the CEO of the affected business
unit.  Seems a little silly in this case, but it can't hurt. (yes, I know we
didn't do it with the turbine stuff)

Kay


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY PM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

AFTERNOON HIGHLIGHTS:

TAXES: Supporters of a permanent R&D tax credit are plotting their next
move on Capitol Hill.

PRIVACY: Industry officials expect renewed attention to privacy legislation
in a Democratic-controlled Senate.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A leading proponents of free software defended a
non-proprietary approach to technology development.

NET GOVERNANCE: Experts said the process developed to arbitrate disputes
over the registration of Internet addresses should not be expanded.

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
People Column: Senior Writer Bara Vaida looks at the top movers and shakers
in high-tech policy.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/people

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- Budget Battles: Jeffords' Effect On The Money Issues
http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/budget.htm

-- Ad Spotlight: Dems Hit Bush Energy Plan
http://nationaljournal.com/members/adspotlight/2001/05/0529dnc1.htm

******************************************************
GOT A JOB TO FILL? CAPITAL CAREER SOURCE CAN HELP

Capital Career Source puts your job listing in front
of thousands of top-notch job seekers -- many of them
regular readers of NationalJournal.com.

Find the right people, right now. Call us at
(202) 266-7259 for details, or go directly to
http://www.capitalcareersource.com.

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Attached is the information you have requested.

Thanks,
Brad Jones


Mark, .... starting to move.. have a few ideas .... the natives are restless... when are you returning to the mother ship?

Regards
Delainey


Marketing

--  Red Lake / (Pataya) Storage  - per the press release, Aquila has purchased 100% of this project being developed by SouthWest Gas.  The proposed 12 Bcf facility, located 30 miles north of Kingman, Arizona near the terminus of TW, will begin its open season the week Feb. 4.  They anticipate tying into both TW and El Paso.  We are exploring options with Aquila to tie in the Sun Devil project plus a new compressor at Kingman, AZ.  The compressor will help Aquila buck TW's line pressure plus facilitate pressure requirements at the California border for TW.

--  Drafting new marketing proposals to both APS and Panda based on the lowered facility costs.

Engineering -  New facility costs are estimated at $831 million and include an additional lateral to serve the APS Red Hawk plant.  Capacity to Phoenix will be 750,000 MMBtu/d with only 30,000/d available for Cal Border.  This is a $100 million improvement versus our original scenario.  The improvements are based on reduced pipe looping to serve Cal Border plus reduced or eliminated compressor stations.  The benefit is reflected in a lower initial capital cost plus lower annual operating expenses.  Rates to Phoenix are estimated at $0.45/MMBtu on a 20 year term with a project salvage value of less than $200mm at the end of the initial term.


Samantha Boyd had a death in her family early this morning and I do not know
when she will return to work.  I do not know her computer password she is
working on time sensitive documents with correspondence being done through
email.  Please reset her computer password and lotus notes password so I may
access the correspondence.  Please notify me of the new passwords.

Thank you,

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I'm far afield of my area of expertise, but Boyd's comments make a great deal
of sense to me.  Gregg, did you/will you pass these along to PERC?  Perhaps
it would help if Boyd could speak directly to the PERC person with the
typewriter, so to speak.

Kay

"Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer%JONESDAY@JonesDay.com> on 08/28/2000 09:10:10
AM
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc: kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: 7-101 Petition re Master Sales Agreement

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

These are my comments re the draft Petition forwarded by Peoples on Friday:
(1) The Petition describes PERC in paragraph and refers to PERC in par. 3.
PERC, however, is not a party to the Master Agreement, and the Petition
does not discuss request any relief with respect to PERC. I don't see why
there is a need to reference PERC. (2) It is my understanding that, under
the Master Agreement, there will be two types of transactions: (a) simple
buy/sells at a clear market price; and (b) complex transactions with
sharing arrangements, management fees and similar structures. As we have
discussed, the first type of transaction, simple buy/sells at a market
price fall under an exemption to Section 7-101's approval requirement (220
ILCS 5/7-101(4)). These types of transactions do  not require ICC approval
and MEH/Peoples are free to engage in such transaction now. I would suggest
that the Petition point this out, particularly if (as I suspect is the
case) MEH and Peoples are now conducting such transactions or may wish to
do so before the ICC acts on the Master Agreement. Because the Master
Agreement covers certain transaction which need approval and other which do
not, I would suggest that the Petition make this clear and request approval
only "to the extent required". (This was the language used by NIGAS in
seeking approval of a buy/sell agreement in Docket 95-0302.) (3) With
respect to the transactions which do require approval (the complex ones
with sharing arrangements, management fees and similar structures), the
draft Petition doesn't say much. It says (Par. 5) that transactions under
the Agreement will optimize the use of the gas supply and capacity assets
of Peoples and MEH; (Par. 9) that Peoples has similar master contracts with
non-affiliated entities; (par. 10) that the agreement will not interfere
with Peoples' operations; and (par. 10) that the Agreement is in the best
interest of Peoples and its customers. All of these statements are fine to
include, but the ICC is likely to want to know more about why the agreement
is in the public interest. Perhaps a sentence or two could explain how the
Agreement will optimize Peoples' use of its gas supply and capacity assets
(e.g., by using capacity which otherwise would be idle) and how this will
benefit Peoples' Illinois ratepayers (e.g., a credit to PGA gas costs).
Also, Peoples is asking that the ICC pre-approve an arrangement under which
the "details" of individual transactions will be filled in later. As I
understand it, the "details" will include such things as the level of
management fees and other compensation terms. To facilitate approval, it
would be best to have some sort of guideline to suggest to the ICC, i.e., a
management fee within a certain amount or percentage of a specified index
level. If there is an industry standard approach that could be referenced,
that may be of use. The Petition suggests that there are other Agreements
of this type with non-affiliates. Perhaps reference could be made to
pricing provisions under one or more of those agreements. If it is not
possible to be any more specific, I am concerned that the ICC may want to
wait and review individual transaction rather than giving blanket approval
without knowing more. (4) The ICC approval process can take 4-5 months
(sometimes more) to complete. The required approval time, however, can be
cut down significantly when the apprval filing includes a Peition and
supporting testimony that lays out all the information needed to conclude
that a proposed arrangement is in the public interest (the interest of
Illinois ratepayers). The Petition itself need not include all the details
(it need only lay out the case ingeneral terms). A filing package which,
with accompanying testimony, tells the full story will expedite the
approval process.


He's a great guy.  Would you mind following up with him soon?  I appreciate
it.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
08:00 AM ---------------------------

Nathaniel Jeppson <Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM> on 01/18/2001 11:54:23 AM
To: "'jeff.shankman@enron.com'" <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: follow-up

Jeff,
As you suggested last week, I am letting you know that I have yet to hear
from Jeff about setting something up.  I did manage to speak with Michelle
about what she is doing and I was exited about what she had to say.  let me
know how proactive I should be about getting in touch with Jeff.  Hope you
are well.
Nat


It seeks to modify D90-09-089 and D97-11-070 so that SoCal can waive the 10%
limit on monthly positive imbalances for noncore customers during winter
daily balancing periods and that noncore customers will be permitted to
combat gas price spikes by using their previous months' accumulated positive
imbalance volumes to meet "flowing supply" requirement.  As of today, SCG is
requiring noncore customers to meet a minimum of 90 percent of their daily
burn  from flowing supplies or from storage

Jim McTarnaghan
Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day
505 Sansome Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-765-8409 (Direct Line)
415-398-4321 (Fax)
jmct@gmssr.com (Email)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:39 AM
To: JWM
Subject: Re: FW: Southern California Generation Coalition Emergency
Petition f or Modification of Decision 90-09-89 and 97-11-070 in
R.88-08-018

Thanks for the congratulations.  What is Stormin' Norman asking for?


I am freaking out!!!!


Dick,

Please find attached a copy of lumber's weekly pricing sheet.  Note that they send out two sheets --- one for end users and one for producers.  I'll forward the producer copy to you also.  Thanks.

KC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Jay
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Carter, Karen E.
Subject:	FW: End-Users Newsletter 9-24-2001

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daigre, Sergai
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 8:32 PM
Subject:	End-Users Newsletter 9-24-2001


Tell me what you think of this map.  It has a little more detail including
storage, miles, etc. but lacks LRC pipe.  This map came from our Graphics
dept.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 05/19/2000
11:46 AM ---------------------------

Ivy Bradberry
05/19/2000 10:57 AM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: NA Norther Natural Gas Map

  This is a power point file.  This map was originally an Illustrator file
and we have a Tif format if you need those as well.  Thanks Kevin, good
hearing from you.


check this out.  Hopefully he will qualify.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
11:05 AM ---------------------------

"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil> on 01/31/2001 11:00:48 AM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Another Committment

Anthony Mix
6'5", 222 Pounds
Wide Receiver
Baldwin County High School
Also plays center on the high school basketball team

Runs the 100m in 10.64

Chose Auburn over Tenn, Ala, LSU, Michigan, Michigan St. and Ole Miss.

His High School grades are good enough to qualify to play as a freshman, but
hasn't scored high enough on the ACT.

Another wide receiver is paying a visit to AU this week.  Roscoe Crosby of
Union, SC.  He also wants to play pro-baseball.  He'll probably go to Clemson
or Georgia Tech.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	11/28/2000 12:10 PM

To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Project

Vasant-

As we speak, I am in the process of working thru the bugs in the new software
product, Data Beacon, commercial has purchased for OLAP.

OLAP refers to Online Analytical Processing. The term is somewhat a misnomer.
The analyses capable by OLAP are not extensive. What OLAP is is a viewer of
empiric data. It is to data as a browser is to published pages.

Data Beacon is a gorgeous product, Vasant, and it will permit easy
tabulations and reporting from even the largest databases, including EOL. I
have continued to listen and store every EOL trade (now over 500,000 of them)
and the resulting "cube" contains well over 1,000,000 records.  Within
minutes, you will be able to come to any slice of the data you want, and view
it in any format (table, graph, chart) you want, and export it to any
software you want. You can save thiese views and come back to them with a
click of the mouse.

The EOL listener, parser and marking-to-market run as compiled C code. They
are completely stable- they have been running for three weeks now without
fail since the last re-boot of the server. They automatically restart if the
server reboots.

The second part of the EOL  project is SAS. It has been paid for by
commercial, and I have worked very hard to facilitate the installation of it
and the training in it. I have personally instructed over 30 people here at
Enron in its use.

Where we are is an ongoing installation of Data Beacon, which should be
finished today or tomorrow. It will take me one day to write the scripts to
automatically "refresh" the cube as information arrives. Then, it will take
me one day to make sure the dimensioning of the cube is appropriate.

Finally, we have tested a web-based database constructor for the Research
Department, which will prospectively build real time time series databases
for you based on your specific designs.

I will deliver this compprehensive reporting solution to you this week.

Clayton


----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 08/22/2001 08:57 AM -----

	Tyrell Harrison 08/16/2001 01:40 PM 	   To: Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate  cc: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron  Subject: Huber San Juan Proposal

If you would, take a look at this short presentation regarding our San Juan/El Paso proposal to Huber.  We will follow up with a call.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


This deal has been changed to a NYMEX swap at $8.14.

Thanks,

Errol

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Diane Anderson                           02/09/2001 09:12 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: QF4314 (EOL 672213) QF4331 (EOL 672217)

Hi Errol.  Have you had any luck with these two deals?

Thanks, Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001
09:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Diane Anderson                           02/07/2001 10:34 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: QF4314 (EOL 672213) QF4331 (EOL 672217)

Hi Errol & Sherry,

We received confirmations for the above referenced
deals from Paribas (they confirm us) and Paribas' confirm
differs from what we show in TAGG.  Paribas' trader, Herve,
says that he spoke with John Arnold after the deal was done
and changed the price from 8.15 to 8.14 and the index from
Gas Daily to NYMEX.     TAGG still reflects the terms that
EOL has.

Can one of you please find out if John Arnold agreed to these
changes, and if so, can you make the necessary changes
to TAGG?

Let me know.
Thanks a lot,
Diane
3-0443


I told you we should have sold cal 5-14 yesterday


These have been auto-scheduled, and I've told the confirms group not to
confirm them. Let me know what the Nov. and Dec. deal numbers are when you
get them.

Kate

Lester Rawson
03/29/2001 09:54 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal updates

Kate,

No we don't need to confirm those deals they are to replace deals entered by
Real Time incorrectly.

I am having to go back and change a number of deals from Oct., Nov. and Dec.

For Oct. I need the following deals for Oct. approved and scheduled.

10/7 563994, 10/11 564001, 10/12 564002, 10/13 564004, 10/17 564007, 10/18
564012,  10/19 564015, 10/20 564016, 10/22 564017, 10/23 564018,  10/30
564019, 10/31 564024.

Thanks,

Les


The latest --

Joe or Jim, how do we "coordinate" with Richard Sanders on this stuff most
effectively?  Or do we need to on this?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 04:21 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/20/2001 03:51 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <MMilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<mark_j_smith@fpl.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <steve.huhman@mirant.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc: <bzycher@rand.org>
		 Subject: Zycher Paper

BAsed on the conference call we just completed, Ben Zycher will be preparing
a revised version of his draft paper which will be circulated later today.

You should return any comments, in a redlined format, directly to Ben, as he
will maintain document control of his paper.  Comments will be appreciated as
soon as possible, but no later than close of business tomorrow.

Meanwhile, I will be significantly redoing the draft filing sent out
yesterday.  It will highlight Ben's findings and attach his paper to our
filing, which will focus on policy and operational issues raised by the FERC
staff proposal.  It will go out later tonight and, as with Ben's paper,
comments will be required no later than close of business Wednesday.

In connection with that, I have redceived the draft Williams comments.  Any
other WPTF member who is planning to file should also send me as soon as
possible the latest version of your proposed comments, so that I can avoid
any inconsistent staments in the WPTF filing and support some of the
positions you are taking.  Thanks!

Dan


Louise, given the number of declines, is there any latitude in moving up the Canadian Headcount. I believe we cut very deep on the 1st go round. Specifically, there is  a couple of analysts and one manager on the commercial side and on the non-commercial side we'd like to have at least one if not two admins for answering the phones (Admins are roughly U.S. $15K/annum and ours are extremely good). We still might come in under our initial headcount given the decline probabilities, but I would like to offer additional jobs asap as opposed to waiting for responses.


Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 02:06 PM -----

	Nora Dobin@ENRON
	11/08/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tim Proffitt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Joshua Tree

Teresa, as I mentioned, attached is revised term sheet intended to reflect
latest commercial changes but subject to legal review.  Please particularly
consider (with commercial and operational teams as appropriate) Engineering
(eligibility) Criteria applicable to proposed VPPs, and proposed terms of
Balancing Agreement, Master Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement, and
Master Crude Oil Purchase and Sale Agreement.  Of course, any other thoughts
you have are most welcome.

We are having an internal meeting (global finance, accounting and tax) to
discuss term sheet at 2:00 PM on Friday, 11/10/00 in EB 2868.

If you can meet with us on Friday or otherwise give us feedback by Friday
afternoon, it would help facilitate finalization of term sheet and movement
to drafting of definitive documents.

Thanks, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 04:18 PM -----

	"Robin Miles" <rmiles@bracepatt.com>
	11/08/2000 02:53 PM

		 To: <james.r.allred@bankofamerica.com>, <richard.stein@bankofamerica.com>,
<stephanie.pendleton@bankofamerica.com>, <nora.dobin@enron.com>,
<tim.proffitt@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: B of A/Phoenix Term Sheet

Attached is a redline and clean version of the term sheet.  Please call me or
Jim Allred with any questions or comments.

Robin

Mr. Robin J. Miles
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana St., Suite 2900
Houston, Texas  77002
Ph:  713-221-1319
Fax: 713-221-2120
E-mail: rmiles@bracepatt.com

 - Phoenix Term Sheet Company Redline.pdf
 - Phoenix Term Sheet.pdf


Hey Carl,

I hope you got my info out to Oliver.  I'd like to hear from him.  I'm still "working" for Enron.  Actually we are just sitting around according to our shift schedule and answering any calls that might come in cuz' there ain't no more tradin' goin' on...

I got an offer to play baseball in Germany this spring/summer.  I think I'm going to do it.  Ich spreche wenig Deutsch, aber mehr Ubungen huete.  (I speak little German, but I practice today)

I plan on sticking around here until 1) they no longer pay me 2) they ask me to leave or 3) all of the above

Hope all is well,
Deano

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl and Chrissy Christoferson [mailto:candc@gocougs.wsu.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:28 AM
To: Dean, Craig
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Hey carl]

Why aren't you staying at your parent's house?  I got a e-card from Toby - thought that was pretty cool...

Check this one out  - I caught and released this nice Chinook hen on the Eel River in Southern Humbolt County last Sunday.
Call me anytime.
Carl


Start Date: 4/2/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040220.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Many thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Subject: Montebello decision

Here it is.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 12:41 PM -----

 - Vieth_Agenda_Dec__5-24-01 agenda.doc << File: Vieth_Agenda_Dec__5-24-01
agenda.doc >>


This looks good. Possibly don't need last two items , we need to decide when
to review this once it is live to see if it is taking off. Also, what does t
aking off mean? Certainly after a month. See what others think about this
list and then we can decide what our plan should be. I'll talk to you in a
day or two. Rick


fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/09/2000 06:10
PM ---------------------------

"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com> on 08/09/2000 05:26:47 PM
To: <heather.kroll@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>, <ozzie.pagan@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: VEPCO Interconnection Agreement

 Attached is a copy of the VEPCO Interconnection Agreement on which I have
made certain changes and included comments in bracketed notes.  (Most of the
notes could be included in a mark-up sent back to VEPCO; there is one marked
"Note to Enron" that is intended to be deleted before we send this out.)

The Agreement, as might be expected, is very  one-sided and is written
primarily for their protection.  It is also very repetitive in places,
although I did not attempt to eliminate the repetition on the theory that the
fewer changes we propose the better and we can probably live with the
repetition.  There are several provisions or concepts I would like to suggest
we include from the form I had prepared a couple of weeks ago (which was
based on the EPSA model form, and was clearly more favorable to the
generation owner than VEPCO's form.)  I have not yet included these changes,
as I thought we should discuss them first and decide how best to proceed on
this draft.  Those provisions are as follows (section references are to the
draft I prepared):

2.43.  Right to tell VEPCO to suspend or terminate work on interconnection
facilities.

2.4.4  Requirement for Vepco to provide status reports on progress of
construction of interconnection facilities.

2.5.2 (maybe)  Agreement to start work on facilities before all studies
complete, if generator owner willing to bear risk of extra costs.

2.7.1 Undertaking by Vepco to use reasonable efforts to complete on schedule
(actually, if 4.2.2 is used, this section probably should not be used.)

3.11.3 (last sentence)  Vepco liable for costs for modifications to
generator-owned interconnection facilities and the Facility if changes
required because of changes to Vepco facilities (unless required by law).

4.1 Vepco must inform generator owner if costs exceed estimate by more than
10% and such increase is subject to generator owner's consent.

4.2.2 Concept that Vepco must seek bids for the work and generator owner can
choose whether the work is done with best efforts undertaking to complete on
time, but no penalties/incentives or with firm completion date and
penalties/incentives.

4.3  Generator owner to provide letter of credit for cost of work or
guarantee (as opposed to 50% paid in advance, as provided in Vepco's draft.
By the way, even if we agreed to pay 50% in advance, it should not be on
signing the agreement, but rather before they start the work.)

4.8.1  Refund if Vepco receives money back.

4.9.1  Language re tax gross up (in lieu of the last sentence in their
Section 7.3.)

5.1  Last sentence--add generator owner's schedules and output,etc. being
confidential.

In addition, there were a few things in the draft I wanted to point out, as
follows:

In Section 2.2.3 and elsewhere in the agreement, they reserve the right to
make a unilateral filing with FERC to amend the agreement.  The generator
owner would have the right to protest the filing, but I want to check with
our regulatory people as to whether they can waive this right, as I don't
think it's fair for them to unilaterally amend it.

Article 4.6 should be reviewed by technical folks.

In Section 10.2.1.3, they reserve the right to file the agreement with FERC
even if the parties haven't agreed and executed it yet and they start service
under the agreement.  As noted above, it's putting your fate in FERC's hands.

The indemnity of Vepco's employees and waiver of the protection of worker's
comp laws in Section 10.5.1 (and the reciprocal in 10.5.2) seemed strange to
me and I was wondering if you could run this past your risk management people.

I look forward to discussing this with you further.

 - 1155119.doc


I talked to Whalley about it a little bit.  The one issue is that when we
liquidate a bad position they get out first.  Think about it.


Attached is a background memo and talking points I prepared for Jeff Skilling
to prepare him for the Pataki fundraiser he is co-chairing in Houston this
coming Monday, June 4th. Please call me if you would like to discuss.

Howard


Scheduled for Febr. 1 at 2pm.

Location - at a fire station in a Hispanic Community - exact location will be
forwarded shortly but estimated distance from ENE office = less than 15 min.

Expect News Conference to last a total of 30 minutes, including Q&A. Jeff
Skilling will be spokesperson for Selection Committee. However, we will try
to have as many committee members present as possible.

Mayor will likely discuss (estimated time = 10 min.):
 - changes that are required at HFD - potential need to bring in an outsider,
etc...
 - reasoning behind involvement of Enron/Jeff Skilling & formation of
selection committee - de-politicize the process, etc...

JS should speak about the following (estimated time = 10-15 min.):
 - how he became involved in the process
 - how the committee members were selected
 - who the members are with a brief background on each (We plan to provide a
bio on each of the committee members as part of the press release)
 - time line for Fire Chief selection

Q&A (estimated time = 5-10 min.)
 - expect questions along the lines of: Are the meetings going to be open or
closed?, Outsider vs. Insider related questions...

Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/issues with the above.
I'll coordinate collection of Bios from Committee members. Anything else I
can do to help out here?

Lisa


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/02/2000 10:57 AM -----

	US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	11/02/2000 08:59 AM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Thursday November 2, 2000

(see attached file:  rt001102.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001102.pdf


Alice S. Eagleson
MBA Candidate, May 2002
Walter A. Haas School of Business
eagleson@haas.berkeley.edu
415-567-5796

-----Original Message-----
From: Alice Eagleson [mailto:aseagleson@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:55 PM
To: mba02@haas.berkeley.edu; mba03@haas.berkeley.edu;
evmba@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: You can still join the Marketing Club!

Welcome new members of the Marketing Club!

To learn more about the Marketing Club at Haas, check out our fabulous
re-designed website, courtesy of webmaster Kevin Petrie:
http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/mktclub/index.htm

The following is a list of everyone who paid dues at Club Night:

Akerkar	Anita
Barthold	Kerry
Brown		Monica
Christy	Nicholas
Daniel	Jason
Gaylord	John
Harris	Kristin
Johnson	Michael
Lacayo	Roger
Mesa		Monica
Phillips (Sales)	Fermina
Plotner	Ryan
Schnauffer	Meagan
Stein		Brent
Zhang		Michael
Chao		Will
Co		Laura
Lynch		Ann Marie
Pearson	John
Rangarajan	Bharath
Yang		Sharon
Zhukovskaya	Tanya

If your name is not on this list and you would still like to join, it's not
too late. (Second-years, you know you want to join too!)

Dues are: $30 for lifetime membership, $20 for one year

Checks should be made out to: MBA Marketing Club and can be put in my
mailbox.

Our first meeting is Tuesday, Oct. 9 from 12:30 to 2:00pm in room C110.

Hope to see you then!!

ali

Alice S. Eagleson
MBA Candidate, May 2002
Walter A. Haas School of Business
eagleson@haas.berkeley.edu
415-567-5796


Mary:  Do you want to answer Laurel?  I haven't heard anything further about
"paperless confirms".  I'll also ask Mark for an update.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 06:36 PM -----

	Laurel Adams
	03/06/2001 03:55 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL confirmations

Ladies,

Could one of you please tell me what is Legal's position on generating
confirms for EOL trades?  I was under the impression (evidently false) that
we did NOT send confirms for gas  deals done on EOL.  I did hear that legal
was currently reviewing this issue.  Do you know where it stands, or who the
best person to contact about this would be?  Please let me know.

We are looking to do some confirm automation (at last, at last!) and one of
the issues we are looking at is do we REALLY need to send paper confirms for
trades done on EOL.  It seems that it would just give someone one more chance
to dispute the trade.

Mary, I was at the DCAF conference where you spoke on the issue of electronic
confirmtions and on line trading, but I don't remember how far Enron was on
these issues.

Sara,  It seems like we talked about this as part of a larger conversation on
web-based confirms.

I would be grateful to hear both of your thoughts/concerns related to the
above.

Thanks very much for your help!


Anya Hoffman
930 Hayes Street, 12
San Francisco, CA 94117
anya_hoffman@gap.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Anya Hoffman


Sounds good. If you talk to Heather Flemming or any one else mention Saturday night. I have to pick up some jeans at Underground so I will stop by and visit you tommorow.

Chris
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leslie Kennedy <kennel5@tdbank.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:58 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	Re: Dan's coming to town...

Hi Chris, yeah I'll be around this weekend and likely up for a drink or two. As long as you don't keep spreading my weekend parties around my office! Just kidding. I actually got an email from Steph at the same time as you telling me about Dan so I don't know who else I would talk to that would care, but I can give it a shot.
Oh yeah...as for the girl I was thinking I should set you up with, she was away last week when you came in but if you're ever wandering around, she sits in the second office in that's behind you when you are standing at the reception desk, her name is Tina and she's one of our financial advisors, really cute & really nice. So you can come check her out and of course stop by and say hi to me.
I'll see you Saturday, if not sooner.
Leslie

Chris.Dorland@enron.com wrote:

> Leslie
>
> What's up? Dan is coming to town this weekend and we are going to try to
> get a bunch of people to go out on Saturday. Let me know if you are going
> to be around and if you talk to anyone else let them know.
>
> Thanx
>
> Chris
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************