I talked to Ina and Eric said he will come in.  The time is apparently between 2:00 and 3:00.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:39 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	FW: This Weekends Move of Power and Gas

Tom, Ina has sent an email (below), letting us know that some people can come in on Sunday to test their computers/applications.  Do you think it's a good idea for anyone to come in on Sunday, or should we leave it alone and have everyone come in early Monday morning?

Laura

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:22 AM
To:	Bates, Kimberly; Villarreal, Alexandra; Vuittonet, Laura; Rybarski, Amanda
Cc:	Hogan, Irena D.; Presas, Jessica; Salinas, Michael
Subject:	FW: This Weekends Move of Power and Gas

Assistants:

It was approved for some essential people to come in on Sunday to test applications and systems only. There will not be time for unpacking.  That will need to be done on Monday morning.
Please check to make sure if these people will be coming in on Sunday and if there needs to be any corrections, please let me know as soon as possible.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:45 AM
To:	Rangel, Ina
Subject:	RE: This Weekends Move of Power and Gas

yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	FW: This Weekends Move of Power and Gas
Importance:	High

John:

I have spoken with the assistants and the following people are the ones who probably need to come in or would want to come in on Sunday:

EAST:				WEST:
Jon McKay			Mike Grigsby
Scott Neal			Keith Holst
Pete Keavey			Frank Ermis
				Tori Kuykendall
CENTRAL:
Geoff Storey			TEXAS:
Andy Lewis			Tom Martin
Hunter Shively			Eric Bass
Martin Cuilla			Joe Parks
				Jim Schwieger
FINANCIAL:			Daren Farmer (maybe)
John Arnold
Mike Maggi
Dutch Quigley
John Griffith
Larry May

If this is okay with you, I will forward it on to Tammy Shepperd.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:01 AM
To:	Arnold, John; Black, Don; Hall, Bob M
Cc:	Choate, Heather; Rangel, Ina; Wood, Kim
Subject:	FW: This Weekends Move of Power and Gas
Importance:	High

GAS TRADING TEAM

Can you guys please prepare a coordinated list of no more than 35 people that can come in on Sunday between 2- 6:00 pm to test trading applications.  Due to the combination of the moves (over 900 people) the IT group wants to ensure that your applications are functioning properly before Monday morning.

The list should be weighted heavier towards those folks who can identify system problems rather than unpacking boxes.  There will still be alot of the move team on the floor finishing installations etc.

Please provide the list by end of business today (thursday).

Thank you!
Tammy
x36589

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bucknell, Martin
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Colwell, Wes; Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark; Donovan, Bill; Rub, Jenny; Kitchen, Louise; Shepperd, Tammy R.
Cc:	Cline, Paul; Duree, Janelle; Lopez, Susan
Subject:	This Weekends Move of Power and Gas

All,
I have included an outline of the move for this weekend, we will commence approx 2:00pm Friday when the power tading market closes. We need everyone (except the 24x7 groups & office of the chair) to be off the phones by 6:00pm. These times have been agreed with the department heads and we will be flexible where necessary upto 6:00pm

We will open the floors between 2:00pm & 5:00pm on Sunday, for the following groups to come in and test their systems and telephones, the users are being selected by the heads of departments and we have support staff on-hand to deal with problems and questions.
25 Gas traders / admins
25 Power traders / admins
10 Gas back office /admins
10 Power back office / admins
Office of the chair and admin staff

Business contingency and fall back positions will be in-place on Sunday

if you need any more information, please call me or pass the requests on via Tammy Shepperd

 << OLE Object: Microsoft Word Document >>
Martin Bucknell - 713 853 1800


As we discussed, here is a first cut at the next steps along the
partnership, accelerator, and compensation activities.  I assume Lou will
take the lead on the Accelerator next steps while you and Cindy will do so
for the other two categories.  See you tomorrow morning.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY on 12/14/2000
07:41 AM -----

                    Dan
                    Marcontell           To:     Suzanne
                    12/13/2000
Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY, Jon
                    10:31 PM
Zagrodzky/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Next Steps

Suzanne - as per your changes this evening....

(See attached file: NextSteps06.ppt)

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 - NextSteps06.ppt


Susan:
Plaese set up a call next week with their legal and credut people to discuss
their comments.  Please include Rod Nelson and Jason Peters on our side.
Taffy has access to my schedule.
Thanks.

Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Matthew Lenhart on 01/09/2001 03:11 PM
To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: updated socal forecast


Attached are the latest communication materials.  We DO NOT have a deal yet, but I am sending these so that you have time to review before holding floor/staff meetings in the event we have an announcement later today.  Please do not forward these materials, as they are not yet final.  If there are any changes in these materials when the deal becomes final, I will resend them.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757

Attachments:
	-- timeline for communication rollout
	-- key messages, for use with internal and external audiences
	-- talking points for use with employees
	-- email to employees w/ link to Q&As
	-- video script (to be viewed by employees on the intranet: UpFront!)
	-- External Q&A, for use with the media and external audiences
	-- Internal Q&A, for background use in meetings with employees
	-- Intranet Q&A, posted on the web for employees


dana good morning i have your makup.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

Nothing.  What's going on with you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:11 PM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

HEY WHAT UP DANA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

You  baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

what up baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [ mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com
<mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com> ]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Frank Telemaque (E-mail)
Subject:

Good Morning Mr. Man!

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.

**********************************************************************


Dear Dana Davis,
  This email is to notify you that the following
e-card which you sent has been received.

 Receiver's Name: Cheryl Sumbler
Receiver's Email: sumwil32@earthlink.net
      Card Title: A Message

Thank you once again for using CrossDaily.com's
Free Greeting E-Cards Service.

God Bless,
CrossDaily.com Greeting Card Team

CrossDaily.com
  http://www.crossdaily.com
ChristianAdvertising.com
  http://www.christianadvertising.com


I will send the card to your sister.  Good call Sam on asking that question over e-mail.  Later
  Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com ]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Christopher M Bedford
Subject: RE: birdman
not on this e-mail........nothing really, just waiting for the test!
address: Jolyn Stepenovitch
              322 oak harbour drive
              juno beach, fl 33408
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Christopher M Bedford <christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com>
             @ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christopher+20M+20Bedford+20+3Cchristopher+2Em+2Ebedford+2Egt2r+40statefarm+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com ]
   Sent:   Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:53 AM
   To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
   Subject:  RE: birdman
   Nothing, what's going on with Tanya, the kid????
   Stro's Rule
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com  <<
   File: mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com  >> ]
   Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:45 AM
   To: Christopher M Bedford
   Subject: RE: birdman
   I'LL GET IT TODAY....
   What's going on??
       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Christopher M Bedford
   <christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com>
                @ENRON
                [
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christopher+20M+20Bedford+20+3Cchristopher+2Em+2Ebedford+2Egt2r+40statefarm+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
    << File:
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christopher+20M+20Bedford+20+3Cchristopher+2Em+2Ebedford+2Egt2r+40statefarm+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
   >> ]
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:35 AM
      To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
      Subject:  birdman
      Birdman, I need your sister's address so I can send her a thnak you
      card.  I know she's porbably used to me staying at the Breakers, but
   I
      still want to send the card.  Later
      Christopher M Bedford
      Agency Field Specialist
      561-627-4164*227
      Cell:561-373-9346 mailto:christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com  <<
   File: mailto:christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com  >>  <<
      File: mailto:christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com  << File:
   mailto:christopher.m.bedford.gt2r@statefarm.com  >>  >>


Mustafa

I finally found Nav.

nrahemtulla@thecampus.com

I am moving to Houston to trade power in the Northeastern US.

Gotta hop,

Chris


Here are Frank Sayre's comments to the NUI Guaranty.
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 05:41 PM -----

	Frank Sayre@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/29/2001 05:36 PM

		 To: Rudwell Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Stacy E Dickson@ECT
		 Subject: NUI Guaranty

Please find attached a version of the NUI Guaranty containing my comments, as
well as a clean version in which all of my comments have been accepted.


Please put together your vacation schedules for the rest of the year and forward to Heidi by 10/25/01.

Heidi, please organize these into one summary and let me see them before they go to Barry.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presas, Jessica
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:03 PM
To:	Fuller, Dave; Whitt, Mark; Harrison, Tyrell; Lucci, Paul T.; Staab, Theresa
Cc:	DuBose, Heidi
Subject:	FW: Vacaction schedules

Please let me know what days you plan on taking off.

Thanks,
Jessica

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Presas, Jessica
Subject:	Vacaction schedules

Pls coordinate a vacation schedule planner for me for all of the staff from now until the end of the year ( including Jan ).  Pls include Denver

BT.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Slinger, Ryan
Sent:	Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:00 AM
To:	Meyers, Bert
Subject:	FW: websites

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slinger, Ryan
Sent:	Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:45 PM
To:	Mier, Michael
Subject:	websites

http://oasis.caiso.com/

http://dotect.ect.enron.com/genstat/epe/status/

https://iso_si/iso/

http://www.ets.oatiinc.com/

file:///W|/ISO_SI/ISOLOCATION.HTML

http://www.tsin.com/nodes/wscc.html


Recent message from China Jonny:

Howdy! We haven't moved yet to Nanjing, I was just there for work purposes.
Will be moving there in late August (probably August 23-25). It's been
rainy/cloudy here in SE China for the last three days, a wonderful respite
from the furnace like heat of the past six weeks. The countryside from
Shanxi all the way down to Jiangsu province was choked with varying shades
of green. Even Shanxi province has received some rain this summer; this
helps mitigate the effects of a three-year drought they've suffered through
recently.

Had a good 4-day weekend in Taiyuan. We had a big dinner party for Ai Ping's

father on his 65th birthday. This party also served as mini-wedding
reception for us and the Shang family's close friends. Both of Ai Ping's
parents are from Henan province. One of Ai Ping's uncles works for her
brother in the steel business. Essentially, he's a good-hearted,
hardworking, farmer from the Shang family's ancestral home village. Northern

Chinese peasants are world famous for their ability to drink gallons of rice

liquor, and I was witness to a fascinating display of this sort. The uncle
must have consumed about a liter of various alcohols including the local
moonshine, a bottle of Jim Beam that I brought, and lots of Qingdao beer.

He was the king of China for an hour; people were rolling on the floor with
his antics. The wait staff of the restaurant even stopped working to observe

him bouncing off the walls in drunken glee. He drank two large whiskey and
cokes within minutes and stated,"It's just like drinking a cool glass of
water!" to the delight of the revelers. Of course, disaster eventually
struck. He hadn't eaten enough food, and his poor liver couldn't process the

tidal wave of booze. First, his head went bonk onto the table. People ran
for cover expecting the worst. He wretched under the table. Ai Ping's
parents were obviously embarresed, but didn't lose too much face because
everyone was friends or family.

We're hoping to make a trip back to the USA in early October if all goes as
planned. Is this a good time for your guys? China has its National Day
holiday (one week) in the first week of October. We would leave China around

the 29-30th of September and make it a one week trip back to the states. The

Wuxi school is obligated to reimburse me for two, round-trip plane tix. I
need to use them before I lose them. This summer's work schedule didn't
allow me any time off. Let me know if this is a good week for you guys.

Dad, we'll need your assistance in obtaining a tourist visa for Ai Ping. You

and Mom will need to write a "letter of invitation" for Ai Ping explaining
the reason for her travels to the US (ie. an Iowan wedding reception). The
person who invites the Chinese national to the US must also do one of two
things according to the US Embassy's website in Beijing: either provide tax
information from the last 2-3 years OR fill out and sign the I-134 form
which guarantees your economic situation. Unfortunately, you're going to be
involved in some more beaurocratic bliss in order for us to get Ai Ping her
travel visa. My sincere apologies. We've begun collecting documents here on
the China side for the same purpose. I'll do some more net research
concerning this issue, and try to provide you with more info. However,
please start preparing these documents if possible. Once Ai Ping is issued a

tourist visa to the states, travels there, and returns she'll have a much
easier time obtaining the next visa in the future because she'll prove to
the INS that she's not an immigration threat. Thank you for your assistance
in these matters.

That's all for now. Will write again in near future with more info. Hope all

clan members are healthy and in good spirits...

Love,

Jon

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


FYI - We agree with the 17.500

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 11:51:38 AM

To:   Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01

Have spoken w/ both gas controls (HPL/DEFS) and will agree with your
17,500.

                    "Melissa
                    Jones"               To:     "Eileen Ponton"
<kponton@duke-energy.com>
                    <mjones7@txu.        cc:     "David Avila"
<davila1@txu.com>, "Charlie Stone"
                    com>                 <cstone1@txu.com>
                                         bcc:
                    03/08/01             Subject:     Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW
FOR
03/07/01
                    09:27 AM

We disagree.  We show 17.500, that was 0200 to 0900 @  60 rate which equals
17.500

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 10:56:39 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU,
Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01

Per my gas control, Tufco went to 60,000 at midnight and reduced to 45,000
at 3:00 am due to PG&E having a compressor down.  Nom rate calculated on 3
hrs at 60,000 and 6 hrs at 45,000.  Please let me know if you have heard
differently.

DATE      NOM       FLOW - MCF           FLOW - MMBTU

3/07      18,750         14,140               14,522

BTU = 1.027


here's the draft I resent to Bear.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 04:37 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	12/27/2000 02:54 PM

		 To: kkopelman@bear.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bear Stearns

Please check this latest draft and call me at (713) 853-5620.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 02:55 PM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	12/27/2000 02:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bear Stearns

Attached is the revised forward template for Bear Stearns.


Dave,

What's up? Lovin' life in Calgary and looking forward to getting back to work. Hope your golf game and chika are doing equally well. Say hi to Scott, Eric and Brian. Drop me a line if you get a second. Take it easy.

Chris

chris.dorland@enron.com
cdorland@hotmail.com
h 403-214-0454
w 403-974-6910


Here's the final that Scott Governar will deliver to Hertzberg today.

Best,
Jeff


Good news - The creditors' committee is okay with the sale of the project on current price and terms.

Bad news -  The creditors' committee wants all of the net cash to go to the estate (I had proposed that we keep enough of the net cash at EW in order to fund our expected WC needs through sale of the company).  We are now negotiating for a freeze on the net cash (through Jan 7) pending a presentation by Enron and CSFB (next week) as to why it is in the estate's best interest to allow EW to operate as a going concern in order to maximize value to the estate on sale of the business.  Mark is on board for this presentation.

Bottom line - if we do not have access to a significant portion of the net cash from this sale, I will not be able to keep the business going through a Q1 sale.  Bad result for all involved.

I will give you a further update when we talk this afternoon.


I would like to check availability for period of Dec 29-Jan 1 for 2 people.  Please advise.
John


calendar - fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001
03:08 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Keeler
05/03/2001 10:48 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Henry Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Catherine
McKalip-Thompson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren
Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Emissions Strategy Meeting

Sent by:  Lisa Jacobson, Environmental Strategies
___________

PLEASE LET US KNOW YOUR AVAILABILITY!

The Environmental Strategies Group will convene an "Emissions Strategy
Meeting" in mid-May to discuss global emissions issues -- such as climate
change and U.S. multipollutant legislation -- and explore some of the
potential business opportunities for Enron commercial groups.

The primary objectives of the session are to 1) provide you with the latest
information on emissions regulation, markets, and Enron's advocacy efforts
worldwide and 2) receive feedback on your commercial interests and input on
policy options so that we may develop the best business and policy strategies
for Enron in both the short and long term.  We invite you or a member of your
group to participate in this important strategic discussion.

Our target dates are May 16, 17 or 18 in Houston (likely time is 10 a.m. - 2
p.m.).  Please respond immediately with your best available dates so we can
finalize our arrangements.

Please review the attached invitation and preliminary agenda.  If you have
any questions or suggestions in advance of the meeting, do not hesitate to
contact me of Jeff Keeler.

We look forward to your participation.

Lisa Jacobson
Manager, Environmental Strategies
Enron
(202) 466-9176


Jana,

Thanks again for the invitation to join you at the Rodeo. It was a great
pleasure
to meet you and your husband.

What   about getting together next week for a movie and/or dinner? I shall
call you
later this week to find out when you are free. I have a trip to NYC on
Tuesday and
Wednesday, but Thursday or Friday should be fine.

I have  a speaking engagement on April 6 in Florida (a conference organized by
Florida Power and Light). This means I shall miss the meeting of
the Symphony Partners on that day. Please, keep me in mind for the following
meetings and I shall be very glad to join you.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 03/06/2000 09:27:44 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: rodeo

Vince,
It was a pleasure to meet you last week at our Rodeo night.  I am glad you
could join us.

I am going to fax you the invitation to the Houston Symphony Partners party
that we discussed.  I hope you can attend.

Keep in touch and let's get together for lunch and/or seeing "American
Beauty."

Jana Phillips
713-658-9296


And we're coming to Houston!

Yeah! I am really looking forward to our trip to Houston this year! Got you
message over Thanksgiving, hope you had a great (long) weekend! We stayed in
town and helped out at the Santa Monica Civic Center then tried to find a
turkey dinner to eat... nothin' like eatin' at a restaurant for
Thanksgiving... :(

We are planning to arrive in Houston on Thursday the 21st and return back to
LA on Tuesday the 26th. We'd love to get together with you (and your beau?)
on Friday if you're still in town and are available! Mark and I love to trek
downtown and see how the rest of the city lives outside of North Houston. Let
me know if that works for you.

Hope you're having a good week. Talk to you soon, Sue

Susan McIntyre-Young
Universal Studios Consumer Products Group
Sr. Art Director
818.777.3297 phone 818.866.0292 fax
susan.mcintyre-young@unistudios.com


This is horrible.  In all my years in DC I don't remember any administration
official (let alone a cabinet member) getting trashed this badly except maybe
Ollie North during Iran Contra.  Tino, lets add this to the list of issues we
need to jointly think through.  DF

Lorraine Lindberg
06/21/2000 02:24 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: tmonaldo@mrg-llc.com

Subject: Richardson testimony - (this gets ugly)

Richardson says FBI has determined drives did not leave Los Alamos
June 21, 2000
Web posted at: 3:00 PM EDT (1900 GMT)

By Ian Christopher McCaleb/CNN

WASHINGTON -- Two highly sensitive computer hard drives that were missing
from the Los Alamos National Laboratories earlier this year never left the
premises, and the FBI has uncovered no hints of espionage in the case, Energy
Secretary Bill Richardson told a Senate committee Wednesday.

Energy Secretary Bill Richardson

The two hard drives, each smaller than a deck of playing cards, held vital
nuclear weapons secrets and were stored in a secured vault at the storied New
Mexico nuclear weapons laboratory.

In a statement opening a lengthy and touchy hearing of Senate Armed Services
Committee, Richardson said: "Based upon the investigation by the FBI so far,
there is no evidence of espionage, nor is there evidence the drives have ever
left Los Alamos."

Richardson added that the FBI seems to be on the verge of reconstructing what
happened to the drives, saying, "Latent fingerprints were found on the scene,
and on the external wrappings of the drives themselves."

The FBI continues to comb the "crime scene" -- a room housing a copy machine
-- and a grand jury has been convened, Richardson said, punctuating his
statement with a declaration that a handful of so-called Los Alamos
"X-Division" employees have offered conflicting statements to investigators.

The secretary speculated that the disappearance of the hard drives may have
been an unintentional mistake by a lab employee, who feared coming forward
when alarms were raised.

"I will not take (disciplinary) action until I have all the facts before me,"
he said, vowing, "I will not rest until I know what happened -- when, where,
why and by whom."

The FBI has said the drives disappeared "at the tail-end of March of this
year, March 28," Richardson said. Should the FBI's timeline prove correct,
reports issued at the beginning of this week that the drives have been
missing since January could be called into question.

The two hard drives were discovered missing on May 7, when weapons scientists
took an inventory of the drives stored within a vault at the laboratory's
X-Division as a massive wildfire approached the facility. The section is
perhaps the most sensitive area of the facility, and is where the most
classified nuclear weapons research, design and development is undertaken.

The scientists had been tasked with checking to assure that all of the
division's drives were safely within the vault in the event that the lab
would have to be evacuated. An evacuation was ordered the next day because of
the fire threat, but no one reported the drives missing until May 31,
sparking a massive search of the area -- and deep anger in Washington.

The drives contain vital information on the makeup of U.S., Russian, Chinese
and French nuclear weapons. They mysteriously reappeared last Friday in a
room at the lab that already had been searched several times.

Richardson taken to task early, and often
Richardson's pledge to bring accountability to bear on those responsible for
the missing drives was met with cold stares from committee members of both
parties. Members of the Senate have awaited the secretary's appearance for
several days, after he last week declined an opportunity to offer Senate
testimony, saying he wanted to wait until he had more information.

Sen. Strom Thurmond

The safety of weapons secrets has dogged Richardson for much of his tenure as
Energy Secretary. During his watch, Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee was
removed from his position amid charges of spying. He has been formally
charged with mishandling classified information -- not espionage -- and
awaits trial.

Members of Congress have also raised red flags over the reported sale of
computers once used at the Savannah River nuclear weapons facility in
Augusta, Georgia. Those computers, two senators intimated Wednesday, may have
once contained classified information that could have been reconstructed by
their new owners.

Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-South Carolina) suggested at Wednesday's hearings that
some of the Savannah River computers may have been sold to the People's
Republic of China.

Sen. John Warner

In his opening statement, Armed Services Chairman John Warner (R-Virginia)
lined Richardson himself up for accountability, saying that although
Richardson has worked to change the security culture at the Energy Department
and the national laboratories, ultimately, responsibility for ongoing lapses
rests with him.

"Mr. Secretary," Warner said directly to Richardson, "On June 23rd of last
year you told this committee, in this room: 'The secretary of Energy,' and I
quote you, '...must be accountable and must be responsible" for such security
failures.

" ... We are holding you accountable," Warner said. "These incidents happened
on your watch. Like the captain of a ship, you must bear full
accountability."

Appearing at the hearing, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Alabama), chairman of the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, repeated his earlier calls for
Richardson's resignation, saying, "I think it's time for you to go."

Harsher still was the criticism leveled by Sen. Robert Byrd (D-West
Virginia), a member of Richardson's own party, who said Richardson's pledges
to get to the bottom of the case would not sway the opinion of the Senate,
whose trust he had lost permanently.

Sen. Richard Shelby

"The horse is out of the barn," Byrd said. Referring to Richardson's refusal
to testify last week, Byrd said, "You've waited and shown contempt of
Congress that borders on supreme arrogance."

Speaking directly to Richardson, a one-time congressman and former Ambassador
to the United Nations, Byrd said, "You had a bright and brilliant career, but
you will never again receive the support of the U.S. Senate for any office
you seek. You have squandered your treasure."

Richardson, who at times looked stunned by the tone taken by many committee
members, sought to defend himself -- arguing that he wanted to have "all the
facts" in hand before making a congressional appearance. He added that he had
made vast changes in the security culture at the department and in the
nation's weapons laboratories, and had put off a good many longtime employees
as a consequence.

"I've been excoriated, but if you go into the scientific and academic
community, I am driving scientists away." He also said he has been accused of
racism in the Wen Ho Lee case, and has had to battle members of own party who
saw regular polygraph tests for employees as a violation of civil rights.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) suggested that the "captain of the ship"
wasn't Richardson, but President Bill Clinton, who Inhofe said was
responsible for a variety of security policy changes and leaks to the media
that have led to a relaxed, careless attitude among those charged with
overseeing the nation's weapons secrets.

'Serious loss of control over classified information'
Also appearing before the panel was Dr. John Browne, director of the Los
Alamos facility.

Dr. John Browne

Browne, while attempting to illustrate for panel members -- with charts --
just how difficult it is to gain access to the X-Division, admitted that his
security operatives have lost control over how classified information is
handled -- mainly because there is no set procedure to determine who handled
much of the material and when.

"This is not an environment one can easily get into," he said.

Still, Browne said, "there is a serious loss of control over classified
information at my laboratory," adding, perhaps for the benefit of committee
members, that he had "no knowledge that the information has been compromised
or tampered with.

"From a national security perspective, these are positive indications."

Richardson was congratulated by Sen. Pete Domenici (R-New Mexico) for ceding
all weapons security issues to a newly confirmed director of a
semi-autonomous agency formed to assess and reformulate all security
procedures.

Sen. Pete Domenici

Air Force Gen. John Gordon, confirmed by the Senate to helm the agency but
not as yet sworn into the post, will report to Richardson, but will not be
directed by anyone else at the Energy Department.

The Senate had held up Gordon's confirmation for months for unspecified
reasons, but he was unanimously confirmed last week after news of the hard
drives' disappearance was released.

"The best thing you could do to leave a legacy for America in terms of
nuclear weapons is to [get this agency operational]," Domenici said, scolding
Richardson not to engage in any "dual-hatting," and let Gordon make the
changes he needs to make.

Warner was less congratulatory, warning Richardson outright that he must
honor the 1999 law creating the agency and allow it to go about its business
unfettered.

The panel closed its session to the public and members of the media just
after noon on Wednesday so specifics of the case could be discussed. Domenici
predicted earlier in the day that a closed session would yield much more in
the way of disturbing information.

"We could go into a closed session, and you wouldn't believe the things you'd
hear in there," he said. "These things have to be corrected too."

When proceedings ended at mid-afternoon, Richardson told reporters he just
wanted "to do his job" and conclude the investigation. He said the fallout
from the security breach was "too political," adding, "I did not utter one
partisan word in that committee."

'Conflicting statements'
Initially, Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, the Energy Department's top
security officer, and Los Alamos Lab Director John Browne said in
congressional testimony that a scientist had reported seeing the two devices
in the vault on April 7, a month before they were found missing and seven
weeks before senior lab officials were notified.

Gen. Eugene Habiger

But sources familiar with the investigation told CNN on Tuesday that this
account has come under suspicion because of "conflicting statements" made
during interviews and polygraph tests.

Another individual has told investigators he went into the vault on April 27
and would have noticed if they had been missing then, but does not recall
actually seeing them.

What's clear, said Goss, is that there was inadequate tracking on paper of
the use of the two drives, which belonged to an emergency nuclear response
team. Members of the team, known as NEST, have been the focus of the FBI
criminal investigation. The team is trained to be ready to find and disarm a
nuclear device on short notice.

The disks, or drives, are designed for use in a laptop computer and are part
of an emergency response "kit" available to team members .

All 26 individuals who had unescorted access to the vault have been given
polygraph tests, according to Richardson.

Browne, the lab's director, has testified that security rules for the
tracking of items classified as secret were eased government-wide in 1992 to
reduce the cost of handling the large amount of documents carrying this
designation.

In early 1993 it was extended by then-President Bush to government
contractors such as the University of California, which runs the Los Alamos
lab. The policy was continued by the Clinton administration.

The President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board a year ago cited
inadequate tracking of secret nuclear materials in a stinging rebuke of
security at the Energy Department and its weapons labs.

While the current Los Alamos security break likely did not involve espionage,
"in some ways it's worse," former Sen. Warren Rudman, chairman of the
advisory board, said in an interview. "Espionage is very hard to guard
against. You win some and lose some. Here you've got a situation where there
is just sloppy accountability and record keeping."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
   RELATED STORIES
Timeline on missing Los Alamos hard drives in question(6-20-00)

Bush on Los Alamos: 'I will bring this sorry chapter to a close' (6-18-00)

Los Alamos lab director: Hard drives may have reappeared to cover
crime(6-17-00)

Missing nuclear secrets found behind Los Alamos copy machine (6-16-00)

Senate hearing examines loss of nuclear secrets at Los Alamos lab (6-14-00)

Secret nuclear information missing from Los Alamos lab (06-12-00)

Conflicting opinions on Los Alamos fire heard on Capitol Hill(06-07-00)

EPA: Data indicates no fire-unleashed radiation at Los Alamos

Fire moves onto Los Alamos nuclear lab property; 14,000 area residents
evacuated

FBI told Taiwan-born physicist he failed polygraph exam that he passed

RELATED SITES
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Department of Energy

House Committee on Commerce: 106th Congress

University of California, Berkeley

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Atomic Energy Act and Related Legislation

Scientific Freedom and National Security

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

MORE STORIES:


no problem -I let Ann Bike know and thought she would handle it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ellis, Laurie
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Trades with So Cal Gas Co's Storage Group

Janie,

Can you send me an email (just something short) with the deal numbers of any future trades you make with Gwoon Tom?  Unfortunately, when you put a note in Sitara's special handling instructions, I don't get any kind of notification.  As long as I know the deals ahead of time, I can make sure they appear on separate invoices.  They also go to different internal mail locations and contacts so I have to correct that as well.

Thanks
Laurie Ellis
Specialist - Gas Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone: (713) 345-9945
Fax:  (713) 646-8420
email:  laurie.ellis@enron.com


I spoke to Kinneman today. Please call me to discuss when you get a chance.

Alan


Hi Danetta,

I heard a rumor that you are the one to look at this stuff.  I know that you
recently went through the process in connection with the Fountain Valley
transaction.  I'm happy to serve up those forms to Freshfields if that makes
it is easier for you.

My number is 713 345 7566.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/02/2001 10:09 AM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Kent,

I don't know whether Lee has mentioned the Delta Power deal that we are
working on.  We are taking 4 turbines and putting them in an LLC, and selling
some of the interest in the LLC to Delta Power.  Three of the turbines are
turbines formerally known as LV Co Gen turbines, and we are buying new LM's
to replace the ones we are using here.  In any event, Delta Power is
financing the deal, and they have asked that we get GE sign off on the
attached documents.  Therefore, I would be interested in your response to the
attached.

I understand that Lee is in New Orleans today, but I'll send him a copy
anyway.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/01/2001 05:10:38 PM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "John Keffer (E-mail)"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Rick Vicens
(E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
<gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc: "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

As discussed during our call earlier this afternoon, please find attached
for onward transmission to GE a draft of (i) the GE Consent and Agreement
and (ii) the GE legal opinion.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - NY003700033.DOC
 - NY003699615.DOC


Hi Daren,

I'm afraid I don't understand what you are asking me to do.  Do you mean that
you want CC 105633 moved to Logistics PC 12667.  If so, there is a
complicated process in order to do so.  Has someone else made this request or
is this your own?  Please explain.

Thank you,

Holly
3-5843

Daren J Farmer@ECT
11/02/2000 03:34 PM
To: Holly Heath/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Revised Allocation %'s - October

Please move my group from Risk to Logisitcs.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Irena D Hogan                           11/02/2000 03:21 PM

To: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised Allocation %'s - October

Please read below and comply as directed below.

Thank you,

Irena
---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------

Holly Heath@ENRON
11/02/2000 02:17 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,  Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd
Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Comello/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yolanda
Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adrial Boals/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Revised Allocation %'s - October

Attached is a revised allocation file for October.  Please note that the
format of this file has been changed to reflect the new team reporting list.
Also, "Global Markets" and "Industrial Markets" have been broken out for
billing purposes.  If you have cost centers that are allocating to either of
these teams, please provide a breakdown of those percentages by Monday,
November 6th.

All other allocations are due by end of day today.

I have also included the team reporting list that is currently in use until
the end of 2001.

Thank you for your help.  Please call if you have any additional questions.

Holly
3-5843


The following would be used only in response to media questions regarding
PG&E credit exposure.

Enron does not comment on specific credit exposures.  We are confident we
have established adequate reserves related to energy issues in California and
regardless of what happens there we are also confident we will meet our 2001
(recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

(If pressed on the accuracy of the amount listed in PG&E's declaration)
There are lots of numbers being tossed around for all parties that are owed
money by PG&E.  All of them are subject to to modification as information is
corrected or updated.  The numbers in PG&E's initial filing were estimates
based on six month old PG&E data that may have been assembled very quickly.

(If pressed on the amount in the creditor committee letter)  Enron will not
comment on specific credit exposures.  We will not confirm or deny any such
numbers rumored to be in confidential correspondence.  Any number presented
would need to be further examined relative to collateral, reserves and other
credit offsets available under the circumstances.  Again, we are very
confident that no event related to this issue will prevent us from meeting
our 2001 (recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

If we are asked if we filed to be on the creditor committee, I would confirm
that we did, and we are.

Mark


what are you doing with the boys during book club?


You asked whether current contract approval procedures require the marketers
to get Legal's approval on all transportation contracts.  The answer is no.
If you look at the ET&S policy on authority to grant transportation and
storage discounts (I can fax it to you if you don' t have it), there is a
column for "Pre-approved Terms" and one for "Non Pre-Approved Terms".
Contracts that are not on a pre-approved form always have to have the Legal
Dept's approval.  Contracts on pre-approved forms with a total discount (for
the entire contract term) of less than $1.2 million do not need Legal's
approval; those above the threshold do. Does that make sense?  As far as I
know our marketers have been following this.  I spoke with TK and she is
aware of the policy, and she is also aware that she needs to show me any
contract that deviates from our standard language.  She has also discussed
this with Steve Harris recently to make sure he's comfortable with the
policy.

If we need to discuss this further please let me know.


TO: All New York Mercantile Exchange Members

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE: CFTC Approves Amendments to Natural Gas Price Limit Rules

DATE: December 7, 2000

Notice # 00-419

______________________________________________

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., has received permission from the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to expand the initial price limits of
its natural gas futures contracts; create uniform limits across all months of
trading; abbreviating the trading halt; and expand the new limits by 200%
when the initial limit is reached.

The amended rules, which are attached, will take effect for the opening of
the open outcry tading session at 9:30 AM tomorrow.

The Exchange announced this morning that the board last night voted to amend
the procedures so the new natural gas limit will be $1.000 per million
British thermal unit and if any contract month is traded, bid, or offered at
the limit for five minutes, the market is halted for 15 minutes.  When
trading resumes, expanded limits are in place that allow the price to
fluctuate by $2.000 in either direction of the previous day's settlement
price.

Currently, the market is halted for one hour if the price in one of the first
two months is traded at $.750 for five minutes.  When the market reopens,
those limits are extended to all months, but are moved to surround the
previous limit in place in the direction of the move.

Under the amended rules, if a halt occurs during the last two days of trading
in a contract, when the market reopens, there are no price limits placed on
either of the first two nearby contract months.

NATURAL GAS: APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO PRICE FLUCTUATION LIMIT RULES

The rules below reflect the provisions that are being implemented.  A copy of
the rules reflecting the changes made from the prior version of these rules
can be obtained from the Exchange,s Legal Department.

Rule 220.08. PRICES AND MINIMUM FLUCTUATION SIZE

(A) Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per million British thermal
units (MMBtu). The minimum price fluctuation shall be $.001 per MMBtu.

Rule 220.08A. SPECIAL PRICE FLUCTUATION LIMITS  FOR NATURAL GAS FUTURES

(A) Initial Price Fluctuation Limits for All Contract Months. At the
commencement of each trading day, there shall be price fluctuation limits in
effect for each contract month of this futures contract of $1.00 per MMBtu
above or below the previous day,s settlement price for such contract month.

(B)(1) Triggering Event and Temporary Trading Halt. If a market for any
contract month is traded or, is bid in the case of upward price moves or is
offered in the case of downward price moves, for five (5) minutes
consecutively at the upper or lower price limit, as applicable, then a
Triggering Event will be deemed to have occurred.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this rule, as a result of such Triggering
Event, the market will be given notice immediately that in two (2) minutes,
there will be a fifteen (15) minute temporary trading halt in all contract
months of that futures contract and the associated option contract
("Temporary Trading Halt"). The market will remain open during this
two-minute notice period, and the commencement of the Temporary Trading Halt
shall not be affected by market activity occurring during this notice period.

(3) Expansion of Limits Following Temporary Trading Halt. Following the end
of the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, the market shall reopen in all
contract months of this futures contract.  When trading resumes, price
fluctuation limits for each contract month, except as otherwise provided in
this rule, shall be expanded to $2.00 per MMBtu above and below the previous
day,s settlement price for such contract month;

provided that if such Temporary Trading Halt occurs on either of the last two
days of trading in the current delivery month, when trading resumes, there
shall be no price fluctuation limits in effect for the remainder of the
trading day both for the current delivery month and for the next nearest
contract month to delivery.

(4) Following resumption of trading after a Temporary Trading Halt, there
shall be no additional trading halts and no further expansion of price limits
for the remainder of the trading day.

(C) Duration of Session Following Temporary Trading Halt.   When trading
resumes after a Temporary Trading Halt, trading generally shall continue
until the regularly scheduled closing time subject to the following
exceptions:

1) if, at the start of the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, there is less
than 15 minutes
before the close, then, when trading resumes after the Temporary Trading
Halt, the trading session shall be expanded as necessary to provide for
fifteen (15) minutes of trading following the resumption of trading, and the
closing period shall be the final two minutes of trading of this 15-minute
period of trading;

2) provided however that if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed
during  the
closing period (on any day other than the last day of trading in the current
delivery month), there shall be no Temporary Trading Halt for any contract
month and no expansion of price limits for any contract month; and

3) provided further that if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed
during  the
closing period on the last day of trading in the current delivery month,
following the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, trading shall resume for
thirty (30) minutes for all contract months. In such circumstances, the
closing range for the current delivery month shall include both the period
from the start of the closing range to the start of the Temporary Trading
Halt as well as the 30-minutes of trading following resumption of trading.

(D) Application of Price Fluctuation Limits to NYMEX ACCESSc  The limits
described in this rule shall apply to trading on NYMEX ACCESSc, except as
provided by NYMEX Rule 6.56 and except that:

(1) if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed during the last ninety
minutes of a NYMEX ACCESSc trading session, there shall be no Temporary
Trading Halt and no expansion of price limits during the remainder of such
NYMEX ACCESSc trading session, and

(2) there shall be no Temporary Trading Halt during a NYMEX ACCESSc trading
session if, in the opinion of the President of the Exchange or his designee,
either the Triggering Event was not reflective of otherwise prevailing market
conditions or a Temporary Trading Halt is unwarranted.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-419)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


please add Tom Martin to this list.

From: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:45 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly R Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Angie Collins/ENRON@enronXgate, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Gross, Adam" <Adam.Gross@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a trader's roundtable meeting tomorrow, April 24th at 4:00PM in
EB3321.  Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thank you,
Jennifer
3-9440


Mark - There's a chance that the EBR may not take place on Monday, I'll let
you know.  If it does still take place, I'll call you on Friday to make the
changes you've outlined.

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	11/01/2000 03:31 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: EBR, 6 November

Steve - After last week's "win" on the European export charge (you have
received a few e-mails from me on this), I think we might want to change the
one slide that touches upon this issue before the EBR.  I do not have the
relevant slide here with me in Tokyo, but could work with Elizabeth on
Friday, changing my earlier materials.  In the prior materials, we showed
this a big "defensive" issue (risk to be mitigated).  I (very) conservatively
put the value to Enron at $5MM for 2001 (Joe Gold says it saves him several
hundred thousand this Q4 alone, and that number is low because he realigned
his supply portfolio in anticipation of the charge being effective Oct. 1,
which realignment he says he has not done/did not do yet for 2001, hence the
bigger figure.  Any way, if you want to make the change, if Elizabeth will
call me Friday, we can work to incorporate it.   thanks  mcs


Dear Kim,

This e-mail is automated notification of the availability of your
current Natural Gas Intelligence Newsletter(s). Please use your
username of "kward" and your password to access

       NGI's Daily Gas Price Index

       NGI's Weekly Gas Price Index

       Natural Gas Intelligence, the Weekly Newsletter

http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/index.html

If you have forgotten your password please visit
  http://intelligencepress.com/password.html
and we will send it to you.

If you would like to stop receiving e-mail notifications when your
publications are available, please reply to this message with
REMOVE E-MAIL in the subject line.

Thank you for your subscription.

For information about other Intelligence Press products and services,
including maps and glossaries visit our web site at
http://intelligencepress.com or call toll-free (800) 427-5747.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. (c) 2001, Intelligence Press, Inc.
---


The Second Extraordinary Session will begin Tuesday, May 15th to deal
with those legislative issues left in first session bills.  The
Legislature is still working on the exact process to convert first
sesssion bills into second session ones and maintain their status (if a
bill was in the second house, it would continue to be there).  We'll let
everyone know the new bill numbers and authors as soon as they are
known.


Susan,
 I find that you have a midly attractive sense of humor and a cynical side to
you that separates you from the rest of the tribe.  Its funny you mentioned
the Astros game.  I was actually thinking of inviting you (since I have two
tickets to tonight's game and all) but you have turned me down so many times
in the past I decided to go with a more conservative pick.  Anyhow, since I
absolutely detest Woody's and all of my bold suggestions for other venues
consistently gets dissed by the group's brain trust, please take me off of
this distribution list.  Have a nice day.

Steve

Susan M Scott@ECT
03/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: val.generes@ac.com, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shanna
Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yvette Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
Feather/Enron_Development@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Alon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson
Kriegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Take me out to the ...

Oh wait, I can't go to the ball game because I couldn't take a day off from
work to stand in the Enron lobby (or send my secretary to do it for me).

For all of you who have managed to snag tickets for tonight's game
congratulations and you suck.  For the rest of us stuck out in the cold I
suggest the only viable alternative before us is to drown our sorrows in a
cold bottle of beer (or two, or three...).  I realize the mass email has been
MIA the last two weeks.  For some this may have been a welcomed relief.  For
others there may have been some concern that they had been cut-off from the
distribution.  At present no one has been removed from the distribution, but
it is undergoing an audit.  Should it be determined that it is necessary to
remove an individual from the list for any reason that individual will be
notified and given an explanation.  If anyone would like to know the causes
for expulsion you can write to:  I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE CARES IF THERE ON
THIS DISTRIBUTION OR NOT BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE WE SEEM TO GO IS WOODY'S
EVERY THURSDAY BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:00.

On that note, see you guys at Woody's tonight around 9:30 or 10:00.


Shirley,

Thanks.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
08/14/2000 03:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Economic Espionage Act Presentation Reminder

We already did rsvp.

Vince J Kaminski
08/14/2000 03:49 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Economic Espionage Act Presentation Reminder

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Scott Tholan                           08/14/2000 02:29 PM

Sent by: Sharon Purswell
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Russell Woody/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Brindle, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Economic Espionage Act Presentation Reminder

Just a friendly reminder that tomorrow, Tuesday, August 15, is the day of the
Economic Espionage Act presentation.  As you may recall, on August 1, I sent
you an invitation to this presentation.   Our guest speaker is Mr. Dan Waltz
from the law firm of Patton Boggs LLP.   In 1996, Congress passed the EEA.
This Act helps shape how corporate American collects, uses and protects
valued information.  Mr. Waltz will include in his presentation some
hypothetical corporate case studies.   I believe this presentation will be
most informative, and I hope that you will be able to attend.

The presentation is scheduled to begin at 1:30 and will be held in the 50th
Floor Board Room.  If you have not yet confirmed your attendance to this
presentation, please call my assistant, Sharon Purswell at 5-7212.   We hope
to see you there!

Scott


Diane
Russell Saunders (Polaroid) RFP for fuel oil and no.6 (617) 386-7301


Thanks for the note and I enjoyed seeing you the other night.  We are working
with Jeff's assistant on the date.  It looks like it may be possible but
there are a few conflicts to dodge.  We will be in touch soon.  Thanks

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/20/2000 11:12:46 AM
To: rcausey@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince,

Good morning.

In my 9/14 e-mail, I advised you of the practitioner-industry CEFER (Center
for Energy Finance Education and Research) Conference we are planning for
Spring 2001.  As you know, we would like to invite Jeff Skilling to be the
keynote speaker at the Thur. evening dinner.  The following day's four
topics consist of Risk management, Deregulation, Real options, and
International/globalization.  The majority of invitees would be
(predominantly U. S.-based) energy-industry practitioners, as well as
several academics.

Given lead time issues in these matters, we have reserved hotel rooms in
Austin for Feb. 22, 2001.  Could I ask you to ascertain Jeff Skilling's
availability for that evening?

Thanks,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


FYI:
If it's ok with everyone's needs, I would like to leave @4pm. If you think
you will need my assistance past the 4 o'clock hour just let me know;  I'll
be more than willing to stay.


Virginia,

Hello.  I was originally inquiring about purchasing a Cross or Signac
impressionist lithograph.  I found them and purchased both from a gallery in
London, William Weston.  They should be delivered this week.  They are
beautiful and will add a lot to our collection.  By the way the Lichtenstein
is up and hanging in our formal living room and it is magnificent.  I have
also purchased an Appel in the last month.

I am interested in several artists.  Actually, a lot.  I will be looking for
one or more of the following.  My concept is that overtime I would like to
own one of all the following artists and they are all depending when I find
something that we really like.  I listed all of our (sometimes mine vs. my
wife's favorites and priorities).  They are kind of in rank order but as I
stated if I find the piece that I like we will purchase it.  I want signed
and numbered.  I realize that some were not signed by the artist but it is an
important fact in my buying decision.  I also realize that some may not have
done any works on paper or they are outrageously expensive.  For example, I
would like to know if Rothko or Kline did any work on paper.

At least that is what I am thinking now.

Bonnard (colorful only)
Lautrec
Suerat (any works on paper? - I don't know that he did any)
Other impressionist or post impressionist lithos
Braque
Moore
Arp
Rouault
Modrian
Rothko
Kline
Motherwell

By the way, I am interested in re-looking at a Picasso (although we have 2)
that your gallery had a couple of years ago.  It was a cubist piece from the
1920s and I believe you called the technique a "push wa" (pronunciation Vs an
attempt at the proper spelling).  It was for sale in a couple of galleries in
SF and was about $20,000.  Is there 1 available?  Also I am still thinking
about the Matisse we discussed before but as you can see, I have a lot of
other artists I am interested in and it may remain on the back burner because
we already have one.

Thanks,
mike


Rose,

Have you seen the signature pages?  We need the agreements and the override
letter.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs
01/04/2001 07:52 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GE Turbine Contracts

Kay:

Were you able to find my faxed signatures?  Do you need originals?  Are you
going to send out a complete set of the final documents?

Thanks,
Brett


I will get them done today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gray, Mary Griff
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 7:47 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Consolidated Edison Energy's request to transact US phy gas products

Miss Tana ---
How 'bout this request --- when will it walk out your door?
Thanks,
Griff


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 12:50
PM ---------------------------

"Hutcheson, Curtis" <Curtis.Hutcheson@COMPAQ.com> on 08/15/2000 07:07:54 PM
To: "'Mike Grigsby'" <mike.grigsby@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Compaq Wireless network

http://athome.compaq.com/defAult.asp?page=showroom&showroompage=showroom%2Fa
pp%2F%2Fdq%2Easp%3FPN%3D%26CompPart%3D200529%2D001%26BaseID%3D%26PriceLevelI
D%3D18930%26AppID%3D18930%26url=http://athome.compaq.com/showroom/static/ipa
q/con-point.asp

 - C.DTF


This should probably be researched further.  If they can really build this
many plants it could have a huge impact on the Cal border basis.  Obviously
it is dependent on what capacity is added on Kern, PGT and TW but it is hard
to envision enough subscriptions to meet this demand.  Even if it is
subscribed it will take 18 months to 2 years to build new pipe therefore the
El Paso 1.2 Bcf/d could be even more valuable.

Mark

----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 03:04 PM -----

	Tyrell Harrison@ECT
	Sent by: Tyrell Harrison@ECT
	02/09/2001 09:26 AM

		 To: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul T
Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Gas Demand Growth

If you wish to run sensitivities to heat rate and daily dispatch,  I have
attached the spreadsheet below.

Tyrell
303 575 6478


Jeanne,
It seems that we are suggesting that the price of energy be representative of
PG&E's avoided cost.  The previous decisions seem to mix up the use of
"avoided cost"  and the real "market price" that the PX was intended to
portray.

If we stress the "avoided cost" aspect, it seems that we would be agreeing
with PG&E's use of the soft-capped-ISO price -- or even with the use of
something as low as embedded cost.

I think we might stress using a substitute for what the PX was intended to
portray -- the price that buyers and sellers are really transacting upon.  We
could refer to some of the good words in the "Preferred Policy Decision":

"From the perspective of both wholesale and retail customers the most
critical contribution of the Exchange lies in the auction determination of
real time pricing of electricity and the transparent manifestation of these
price signals.  In the absence of such an institution the market will be
hidden and the price signals obscured or subject to selective, discriminatory
dissemination" (page 12)

Another point might be the fact that implementing PG&E's proposed change
would, in effect, be a selective rate increase for Direct Access with no
notice.

Note to Internal people:
I'm still working on our discussion document -- I will forward as soon as I
can.

/Tamara.


I have received verbal notification that the early termination of the waiting
period for the HSR filing has been granted.  Written confirmation should be
available today or tomorrow.


Hello Mark,

I am trying to follow up on Remedy Tk ( 54001 ). I opened this Tk for this
customer having questions about the ETA. Please let me know, how you would
like to respond to customer's inquiry about modifications to the ETA.. Thanks.

Cecil John
EnronOnline
713-853-6259

---------------------- Forwarded by Cecil John/Corp/Enron on 01/27/2000 10:54
AM ---------------------------

Cecil John
01/24/2000 02:41 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ETA

Hello Mark,
Please advise me on this matter and let me know if you want me to follow up
with the customer or if you contact customer.  EOL customer is inquiring
about if their Lawyers can modify or  make comments to the ETA. Thanks.

Cecil John
EnronOnline
713-853-6259

------------------ Forwarded by Cecil John/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2000 02:33 PM
---------------------------

"Smith MD (Mark)" <MDSmith@equiva.com> on 01/24/2000 02:01:11 PM
To: "'help@enrononline.com'" <help@enrononline.com>
cc:  (bcc: Help)
Subject: ETA

My manager had a question concerning the ETA's and if they can be modified
if our Lawyers have comments or changes that they would like to make.
Thanks


Please keep Bill and I in the loop.  Thanks.

From: Sara Shackleton on 11/22/2000 05:27 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Global Finance Deals:  year-end, quarter-end, year round

Tanya:

This year is no different from any other year and we are always asked to
review the swap component of the Global Finance structured deals.  We are
also seeing lots of prepays.

Who is the credit person to be apprised of these transactions?  Should we
immediately involve you and Bill?

At the moment, Mary Cook, Angela Davis (legal finance group) and I are
juggling the deals.

Please let me know and I'll alert the swap group.  Thanks.  Sara


The posted number was a mistake.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 09:24 AM -----

	"Schlossberg, Robert (NY Int)" <Robs@edfman.com>
	10/31/2000 09:18 AM

		 To: "'Tana.Jones@enron.com'" <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline Confidentiality Agreement

I was asked to contact you regarding your proposed confidentiality
agreement.

As drafted, we think the confidentiality agreement is overly broad, and
potentially could limit our ability to speak with and participate in other
ECNs.  Consequently, I suggest that we create a definition as to what items
specifically constitute confidential information, and attach a list of those
items as a schedule to the agreement.  Using this methodology, we prevent
putting ourselves in the position where we need to worry about the broad
definition currently contained in your agreement every time we speak with a
competing ECN.

If you wish to discuss this matter further, I can be reached at (212)
566-9647.

Regards,

Rob

Robert P. Schlossberg
General Counsel
E D & F Man International Inc
Two World Financial Center
New York, NY 10281-2700

Tel:  212-566-9647
Fax: 212-566-9460
robs@edfman.com

____________________________________________________________________________
_
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments
hereto) is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
by resending this communications by email to sender or by telephone at
212-566-9647 and please delete the original message and any copy of it from
your computer system.  Thank you.


Please place on your calendars a date with Mr. Stan Horton.  On Wednesday, September 26, Stan Horton would like to have an appreciation luncheon with Steve and the TW Team.

We would like for everyone to make the necessary arrangements to attend.  If this conflicts with any of your calendars, please let me know as soon as possible. (Via voicemail, since I'm out on Monday and Tuesday.)

Thanks in advance,

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 01:28 PM -----

	Dovie Keprta@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/20/2000 11:37 AM

		 To: Peter Feltman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kara Knop/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Finken/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephen Abbanat/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Brad Harris/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rex Shelby/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David Berberian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike Haney/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark S Palmer/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Mathis Conner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jake Staffel/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA process

Group-

Earlier this week, we met Tana Jones (Senior Legal Specialist) and Leslie
Hansen (Legal Counsel) with ENA (servicing ENW) to discuss the process for
executing NDAs.  Leslie will serve as in-house legal counsel for EMS while
Tana will be the Senior Legal Assistant for all documentation such as NDAs.

There are two general forms that ENW uses for NDAs.  The first form is
bilateral and used when both parties are disclosing confidential business
information.  The second is unilateral and more clearly and thoroughly
articulates Enron's interests.  The second form should be used when Enron is
the only party disclosing confidential information.

When you would like to execute an NDA with an outside party, please contact
Tana via email (tana.jones@enron.com) and carbon copy myself, providing the
following information:
 1.  Which form you would like to use
 2.  General description of the confidential information to be shared
 3.  Counterparty's legal name
 4.  Counterparty's address
 5.  Contact name at Counterparty
 6.  How/where to send NDA and appropriate information (fax or email and
number or address).

Regards,

-Dovie


MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

The Quarterly New Hire Dinner has been scheduled for 6pm on Thursday, April
26th.

Invitations (with the details) will be going out on April 11th.


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has removed MTB (Doink) at Oct 23 2001  7:58AM
	M?Bank (NYSE:MTB)  Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  MTB   68.50  10:48AM  0.80  68.72  67.51  159,900  Community Take   7 Long / 5 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Tue Oct 23 07:55:23 2001   got the move down.  eyeball the 66 dollar level which is shaping as support.  similar to GDW, short weakness below 66 or strength that results in a stochastic overbought condition.   recommended MTB Short on Oct 1 2001 when it was trading at 73 3/4. Since then it's gone down 8.20% to 67 1/2.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


Attached is termination revised with Mary's changes.  Per Mary's conv.
w/Fred, if the Counterparty failed to make payments hereunder, the contract
would not be void ab initio, but instead, any payments to the counterparty
would be offset against any amounts owing to us.

	Larry Joe Hunter
	09/15/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Partial Termination Doc - Central Resources

Tana,

Fred wanted to be very specific about the amounts due.  Can you have a look
at the attached and let me know if it will fly?  See Brant's e-mail for
numbers.

Thanks,
Joe


Shirley,

Please, make reservations at 6:30 at La Tour d'Argent for 2
Thursday, this week.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

"Paul Johnson" <pj@austingrp.com> on 05/30/2000 02:09:47 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: TAGE

Vince,
Thank you for the test message. Please find the attached resume of Spyros
Maragos for your review and consideration. You are confirmed for dinner
@6:30 pm Thursday evening with Mr. Maragos.

Paul Johnson, CPC
Owner

----- Original Message -----
From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <pj@austingrp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 1:57 PM
Subject: Test

>
>
> Test
>


Did I send this to you already?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilhite, Jane
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:

Thanks for the cookies - I broke down and had a second!!

Jane Wilhite
ext. 35063


broker is right - changed to Coral

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/08/2001 01:44 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource checkout

541368
broker has coral for the cp

missing deals for mike:

buy idaho
Q3
25 mw
280.00
mid c
light load

sell aep
Q3
25 mw
290.00
mid c
light load


SBXX 78 passed the assembly yesterday with the minimum number of Democratic votes
The bill still has the 8/25/01 date
The bill now goes to the Senate for concurrence or possibly conference committee
More to come


Enron and Dynegy each announced today that they are holding discussions about a possible merger of the two companies.  As you know, Dynegy is a major player in the energy marketplace, and is not only a competitor, but also a counterparty of Enron.  This is just one of several options that we are considering.

Upon receipt of this announcement, the NYSE briefly suspended trading of both Enron and Dynegy.  We have no additional information we can share at this time.  We'll keep you updated as developments occur.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"publications@enerdata.com" <publications@enerdata.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22publications+40enerdata+2Ecom+22+20+3Cpublications+40enerdata+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject:	May 2001 CGPR

 - cgprMay01.pdf


she still works here.  she is probably on vacation or something.  i am sure
she will get right back to daddy when she gets in town.  she sounds hot.


actually i am staying at the adam's mark hotel downtown.  i will definately
be able to see you guys at least once.  i am not sure what the schedule is so
i will just play it by ear.  i wish i was coming in for the weekend, but the
tickets were twice as much and they don't want to pay for my vacation.  call
me tonight & i will let you know details.


Greetings:

Please review the attached.  It's a summary I've put together of a very
lengthy analysis MRW did for us over the weekend.  I've also attached the
considerably lengthier MRW memo for those who'd like to see it.  The tables
included in the summary are pulled directly from the MRW memo.  The analysis
only addresses the utilities undercollection (i.e., solvency) and doesn't
address any additional increases that might result from DWR's buying
activities.

The Bottom Line
 By raising average rates 10% over a 10-year period, California could 1)
return the utilities to solvency, and 2) help close the  supply-demand gap by
providing customers with better price signals.
 California could achieve these goals under this new rate structure and at
the same time exclude one-third of residential  customers from any increases.
If California chose not to exclude any customers from the new rate structure,
California  would only need to raise average rates by about 8.8%.
 This level of increase is in line with increases enacted in other states
(e.g., Washington: 28-34%; Montana: 4.5-32%; Idaho:  6.0-24%; Nevada:
7-12.5%; New Mexico 12%).

We'll need to look at it critically and try to shoot holes in it before going
public with the numbers as part of our broader effort, but it offers a
reasonable benchmark against which to judge alternatives (like spending the
kids lunch money on crumbling, broken down transmission systems).

Please provide feedback as soon as possible, and perhaps, Paul we conclude
the MRW work on the agenda for discussion on tomorrow's daily conference call.

Best,
Jeff

 - Undercollection assessment final.doc


Notice No. 01-108
March 27, 2001

TO:
All COMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All COMEX Division Clearing Members
All COMEX Division Floor Traders
All COMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:
Michael Campanelli, Vice President
Floor Operations, COMEX Division

RE:
Spot Month Procedures on the Eve of First Notice Day

Please be reminded that Friday, March 30, 2001, is the First Notice Day, for
the Gold, Silver, Copper and Aluminum futures delivery month of April 2001
(the new spot month).

On Thursday, March 29, 2001, the Eve of the First Notice Day, all Brokers and
Clearing Members must have a duly authorized, On-Line Trade Entry (&OLTE8)
system trained representative available until such time as the Exchange deems
necessary.

It is imperative that trades involving the Spot Month are processed and
cleared properly.  Therefore, representatives are expected to make a diligent
effort to process all Spot Month trades accurately.

Failure by any Clearing Member or qualified Floor Trader to show due
diligence involving Spot Month Trade processing may result in severe
disciplinary action by the Exchange.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact David
Sherman at (212) 299-2061.

MC/ms

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refd
oc=(01-108)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Attached please find referenced list.  The only amended counterparty with a
change was Murphy Exploration which was shut down for power.  I wonder, when
we are working with amended counterparties, if there is some way that my
prior approval could be on the recent spread sheet?  Right now I have to go
find the old spread sheet to find out what I approved it for last time to see
if I have any problem with the change.  So usually, unless I have - change
next to amended, it means I had no change to what I said before.  Does that
make sens?


Anytime after 4:00 PM.

-Andy


I asked everyone for their A/A needs and received very little feedback.  Please respond promptly.

Thanks

John


Kerri-see note next to last one  Thanks S

   Kate Symes                01/16/2001 03:57 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: missing deals for apb

497570
just added broker

497633
just added broker

497915
deal is entered correctly                               Kerri- it was already
verbally confirmed with APB, was there anything
Buy PSCO                                                           else in
question?  Thanks  Steph
17th
25MW
200.00
Palo

Let me know if you still can't see this last one.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/16/2001 01:46 PM
To: kate.symes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: missing deals for apb

jeff
buy scem
17th
25 mw
240.00
sp15

diana
buy pudget
17th
25 mw
290
cob

tom a
buy psco
17th
25 mw
200.00
palo


In 5 minutes, I already tried twice.

-----Original Message-----
From: KCarter@simmonsco-intl.com [mailto:KCarter@simmonsco-intl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject:

are you ever going to call me back or just play liars poker all day

Kerry E. Carter
Analyst
Simmons & Company International
(713) 236-9999


461136
mike
broker has 25 mw, we have 50


Can you tell me which pools this impacts and how much by pool (hastings,
Bridgeport ...)

To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: CNG-Kriscott

FYI.  I received a letter today from Ed Arnold with Kriscott Inc. stating
that they will be terminating their CNG gas contract effective 5/1/2000.  For
volume purposes, his four meters produced about 3,000 dths a month.  Let me
know if anyone wants a copy of the letter.

Thanks,
HG


Return-Path: <Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com>
Received: from  rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (rly-xb04.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.105]) by air-xb01.mail.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINXB14-0914115301; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:53:01 2000
Received: from  BATL0S04.cbi.cox.com ([206.98.143.251]) by rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXB48-0914115225; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:52:25 -0400
Received: by mail.cbi.cox.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)	id <RNW6P00J>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:46:36 -0400
Message-ID: <AD927D10BCE3D211AAF600A0C9EA31B30395A0D0@mail.cbi.cox.com>
From: Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com
To: bswaldrop@aol.com
Subject: FW: Something Special
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:46:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C13D34.6F1A63DE"

Subject:        Something Special
Hi Everyone.  One of our favorite Dallas clients sent the attached file. She gave us permission to share it with you, too.
- fred :)
 <<11 Sept 01.jpg>>

 - 11 Sept 01.jpg


Kristin will be working for EBS at the time of this class, reporting to Barry
Pearce.  Please contact Kristin or Barry for the appropriate RC within EBS to
charge for the fee for this class.  If you charged ENA at the time of
enrollment, please reverse that charge.  Thanks.

Ernie
08/03/2000 10:05 AM
Sent by: Kristin Albrecht
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Class Confirmation - Kristin Albrecht

Kristin Albrecht is enrolled in Derivatives III - Deriv Structuring Profiting
from Unbundling & Embedding

Class Days and Times:
  11/9/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  11/10/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
Participant Fee: $1000.00

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.
Your Company and RC will be charged $1000.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


I was just sitting here thinking, now that y'all are doing the financial
confirms up there, your Confirmation Desk people need to be on the
distribution list for our emails when we get signed masters in, so they know
when they need to change from a non-master style of confirm, to a master
style of confirm.  Who, pray tell, might your Confirmation Desk people be so
we can add them...


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Group

Let,s give a big round of applause to the Weather Team!  Environmental
Finance Magazine ranked the weather group #1 in Online Services and #1 Dealer
in the United States and Europe.  Gary Taylor, manager in weather trading,
comments, "The "Best Dealer" award reflects our counterparties' appreciation
for the significant effort we have made to drive the growth of our market by
making two-sided markets where other companies are only willing to quote
either a bid or an offer.  This award also reflects the innovative nature of
everyone on our desk, and their ability to price non-standard structures for
our customers.  It is truly a team award.  The "Best Online Dealer" award is
simply another testament to the unparalleled success of EnronOnline.  By
providing tight, two-way markets online, we have provided two critical
elements to generate growth in our market: 1) an element of price discovery,
and 2) a quick and easy way to transact."

The Weather Risk Management group launched a new product this week:  Power
Demand swaps.  These contracts use power demand as an index and allow power
market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers, etc...) to
mitigate volumetric exposures.  The first contract the desk offered is for
the PJM power pool.  On EnronOnline, weekly swaps are available and the desk
has placed option contracts on this index in the broker market.  Inquiries
regarding this product should be directed to Claudio Ribeiro (product
manager) x37313, Gary Taylor x31511, or Valter Stoiani x36906.

Competitive Analysis and Business Controls
eSource, Enron's premier corporate-wide research group, launched their new
intranet product, eSearch, on December 1, 2000.  eSource's team of
specialized researchers have created a web site to bring information and
research to every employee's desktop.  The eSearch web site offers many links
to information resources, access to research databases, specialized searches,
sites to purchase books, articles, and reports, and training.  Employees can
use the web site to conduct their own research or as a vehicle to submit
research requests.  eSource's researchers and industry specialists are
available to all Enron business units to provide timely and cost efficient
research, to work with individuals or groups to fulfill one time research
requests, or to design ongoing, customized monitoring projects or news
updates.

Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
EGM Fundamentals is quickly building a team of expert analysts and associates
to work directly with traders and marketers.  The team is already busy
analyzing various commodities and market situations.  For example, an
initiative is underway to analyze current negative fractionation spreads in
the market resulting from rising natural gas prices.  Web sites to host this
analytical information are currently in development for all EGM commodities.
These sites will provide research and analysis, weather, publications, and
any other information that will assist in decision-making or identification
of potential commercial opportunities.  For questions or requests regarding
fundamental research, contact Jennifer Fraser at x34759.  For questions or
suggestions regarding the web sites, contact Heather Purcell at x54057.

Austin Energy
Austin Energy and Enron Sandhill, L.L.C, a subsidiary of Enron North America
broke ground November 29, 2000 for the construction of the Sand Hill Energy
Center, a 180-megawatt peaking electrical generation facility.  Located in
eastern Travis County, the Sand Hill Energy Center will be a natural gas
fired facility that will operate primarily during peak demand periods.  The
$93.7 million project will feature four 45-megawatt General Electric gas
turbines and will be operational May 1, 2001.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBALFLASH

Coal
The London dry cargo seafreight team traded 1 million metric tonne of
Capesize vessel swaps via EOL in one day, (Wednesday 28th November). The deal
was created by combining OTC options and a physically related cash market
deal.  This helps to bring our YTD EOL to just under 2.5 mln tonne.

Off-shore wind energy deal
Enron Wind has signed a power purchase agreement with Swedish energy company
Graninge.  According to the agreement, Graninge will deliver electricity to
consumers using Enron's wind power plants in southern Sweden.  Enron Wind's
Utgrunden off-shore wind park, completed this year, will generate in the
region of 38,000 megawatt hours of electricity, or enough for around 6,000
average homes between the mainland and the island of Oland on the southeast
tip of Sweden.  In an announcement this week, Graninge stated that it plans
to market the power to consumers as 'green' energy.

Happy 1st Birthday EnronOnline!
This week saw EnronOnline celebrate its first birthday.  During the course of
its first year, EnronOnline has passed a number of milestones including the
addition of a range of new functionalities for customers on the site.
EnronOnline has now come of age, having surpassed the $274 billion mark in
notional value in November.  This represents a total of 478,695 transactions
since the site was launched on 29 November 1999.

The first anniversary was marked by giving the media guest access to
EnronOnline in Europe.  A team from Reuters was invited into Enron House to
receive a full demonstration of EnronOnline and as of today will be able to
quote in reports live prices from EnronOnline.  Other media outlets are being
invited to obtain guest access during the coming weeks as the word of
EnronOnline's success continues to spread...

Australia
Enron Australia continues to assist in the region in a supportive role.
Elliott Katz worked on the GEM migration in Singapore last week with an IT
team from London, Oslo and Singapore.  Approximately 40 users, including
Traders, were migrated to Windows 2000 and the CORP domain.  This is an
important step for the Asia Pacific region, as it brings the three biggest
offices (Singapore, Sydney and Tokyo) into line with corporate standards for
desktop computing.

Japan
E-Power, a JV between Enron and Japanese finance company Orix, has announced
proposals for a 2000MW gas-fired power plant at Mutsu-Ogawara, an industrial
area  in northern Japan.   A feasibility study will be undertaken to define
how the project will go forward and this may include the development of an
LNG terminal in the vicinity.  The nature of the permitting process is such
that the plant would not begin operations for six to seven years.  This
project is just one of several options that E-Power are working on in Japan.

NUGGETS & NOTES

&Go Big or Go Home8 ) Mike McConnell/President & CEO-EGM

"Call Back" - Don Schroeder, VP/Crude Trading-EGM

REMINDER

Holiday Party
Enron North America, Global Markets and Industrial Markets
Enron Field
Saturday, December 9
7:00 - Midnight

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Joseph Taylor, Jennifer Rosado, Rabi De, Louis Dicarlo, Scott Churbock,
Kenneth Parkhill, Nicholas Ernst, Dirk Dimitry, Stephanie Taylor, Dimitri
Tagaropulos, Georgia Blanchard, Jona Kimbrough, Jeffrey Baldwin, Patricia
English, Jaesoo Lew, Cheryl Nelson, Gina Abbott, Ryan Keith, Brian Dawson
EGM )Ellen Alexander, Mike Perun

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Gregory Golden
EGM ) Keynan Dutton

FROM THE EDITORS

Thank you to all the contributors to this week's EnTouch.  We want to hear
from the various departments within Enron Americas, Global Markets and
Industrial Markets!  Please continue to send your business highlights,
nuggets & notes or suggestions to Michelle Vitrella or Kathie Grabstald.

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


The report named: West VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=26&report_name=West+VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/16/2001>, published as of 10/16/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)


Hey guys.  Let's try this.  Take the data from 2000 and change the
following.  Take Keystone West volumes to 850,000/d rateably, then add the
new gen numbers posted below.  You will need to add this demand to the EOC S
ML demand numbers (Is Salmayuca included in this number?).  We should use the
2000 waha west volumes for now.  You should end up with reduced ehrenberg
volumes for the reduction in Keystone west volumes and the addition of New
Gen demand.  Run the storage balance at 2000 Socal in this scenario.  We will
then plug forward with waha west volumes to balance Socal in 2001.  Also, add
columns to adjust (90%, 60%, 50%, etc) the burns for new gen in SW.  We
should then look to adjusting socal demand down for the high hydro/increased
NW imports to CA scenario that could happen.  Use the SP-15 2000 gen numbers
and then back out the avg of 1999 and 2000 power imports.  I would like to
avoid averaging 1999 and 2000 socal gas demand. Use a 10,000 heat rate to
reduce gas demand.  Have Jay adjust EOC demand for normal weather.  We may
have to refer to the load sensitivity data from west power to reduce the SW
electric loads and then back out of gen numbers using a 10,000 heat rate.  We
will then be exposed to EPNG and the OPS increasing Keystone west volumes
between now and next summer - run the 2001 with this possibility as well.
Take Key West to 1.1 bcf.  Let me know where my errors in approach may be.

This should give us a picture of the Socal deliverability for 2001.

Thanks,
Mike