FYI.  Note toward end of story, mention of email from lawyer in class action suit to Davis advisor asking for help in "getting information out."

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/24/2001 02:05 PM -----

	"Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com> 07/24/2001 01:51 PM Please respond to "Ken Smith" 	   To: "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan J Mara" <smara@enron.com>, <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>, "Karen Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Dan Walters

Dan Walters: Blame game over California's energy crisis will continue for years

(Published July 24, 2001)
The wrestling match between politicians and Enron Corp. moved into a more intense arena over the weekend when a state Senate investigating committee sought contempt penalties because the huge energy company has refused to turn over internal documents.
Although Houston-based Enron owns no major power plants in California, it has adopted the toughest stance of all energy companies against the multiple investigations of why wholesale energy prices spiked so high. And it has become, in turn, a whipping boy for California politicians.
At one point last spring, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer said he wanted criminal charges against Enron and its chairman, Kenneth Lay. "I would love to personally escort Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a tattooed dude who says, 'Hi, my name is Spike, honey,' " Lockyer said. With less colorful language, Gov. Gray Davis has often castigated Texas-based companies as price gougers -- even though Texas firms have been fairly minor suppliers to California.
Some of it is just buzzword politics. Lockyer and Davis know that Californians dislike anything associated with Texas, and Lay has been one of President Bush's major political supporters. Enron, meanwhile, cites the rhetoric as evidence that Lockyer, Davis and legislative investigators are interested less in finding the truth than in seeking scapegoats. Enron also filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Senate's subpoenas of trading data.
Most other energy companies have complied with the demands, creating Sacramento repositories of the data under elaborate confidentiality agreements worked out with the special Senate committee headed by Sen. Joseph Dunn, D-Santa Ana. But Enron has refused, and on Saturday, Dunn submitted a report asking the Senate for "an appropriate coercive sanction."
Does Enron have something to hide? Or does it sincerely believe that what's happening in California is political scapegoating? Are the companies' fears about the confidentiality of the data sought by the Senate justified? Would data be selectively leaked to show the firms in the worst light? Would data be used by competitors? Or could the information find its way into the hands of class-action attorneys?
Dunn, a prominent trial attorney himself, insists that confidentiality will be protected and that the information being sought is only for legislative purposes. But Enron and the other companies have some reason to be wary of turning over confidential information to politicians. Similar information was leaked -- without penalty -- in last year's investigation of former state Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush. And there are indications that private lawyers are working closely with investigators.
Mike Aguirre, the San Diego attorney seeking a "smoking gun" to prove collusion among energy companies, supplied Dunn's committee with a few dissident Duke Energy workers who alleged, in highly publicized hearings, that the firm had manipulated production at its San Diego plant to create artificial shortages and drive up spot market power prices. Duke then refuted the charges by releasing some excerpts from the records of the Independent System Operator, the controller of California's power grid, indicating that ISO had ordered the plant operational changes.
Aguirre subsequently asked the governor's office to pressure the ISO -- now under Davis' direct control -- to release all of the Duke-related documents that would show, he says, that the firm actually manipulated the situation. Duke and other companies insist that the ISO-held documents are proprietary. Aguirre pleaded with one Davis adviser in an e-mail that "we need your help in properly getting this information out." But Aguirre, in an interview, said he had not yet obtained cooperation from Davis aides.
The political and legal struggle to affix blame for California's energy woes will continue for months, perhaps years. The crisis will cost ratepayers at least $50 billion, and they'll want to know why as they make out their utility bill checks.

The Bee's Dan Walters can be reached at (916) 321-1195 or dwalters@sacbee.com .


calendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:31 AM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	11/30/2000 12:07 PM
	Please respond to kelly.johnson

		 To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron@Eott
		 cc: Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: ENE Board Meeting - December 12th

The Enron Corporate Policy Committee has been invited to attend the Tuesday,
December 12th Board meeting. The meeting begins in Executive Session, a
closed session, involving the Board members at 8:00 a.m. Following the
Executive Session, the Corporate Policy Committee will be asked to join the
Open Session beginning at approximately 9:00 a.m. Since we are never sure of
the exact length of the Executive Session, we request that, if you are
attending, you wait in EB5001 until the Executive Session is completed.


Are you going to be here much longer??  I'm going to leave pretty soon.  Let
me know if you want a ride.


I don't even know what they're doing to this area!  Maybe this is for new
offices.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/25/99 10:07
AM ---------------------------

Robin M Jordan
08/25/99 09:57 AM
To: Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wende Warren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jordan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janice Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina
Mordaunt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Doug Pedigo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-ECT
Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reconstruction of Clerical Area

 During   the  construction of the clerical area the clerks will do their
best to continue to function in a normal manner.  The fax machines will be
located in EB3837A  (cubicle area in front of Suzanne Adams).    There should
be no interruptions in the fax lines per the Telephony Services.  Office
supplies will also be boxed and stored in various areas throughout the
floor.  There will be 2  phones  and computers available to the clerks.
Reginald will be located at EB3808B x39288 and Tim and Kenneth will be
located at EB3808B x31459.

 This may  cause time delays on various functions of the clerks:

Faxes being sent, received, copied and delivered in a timely manner;
ASAP deliveries/pickups/courier outgoing/incoming/scheduled and unscheduled
daily runs to Allen Center;
Telephone accessibility will be limited;
Space preparation for large ASAP copy jobs;
Availability of clerks when needed;
Accessibility/ordering of office supplies;
Mail being sorted and distributed in a timely manner.

 This will begin today Wednesday,  August 24th, and probably will not be
finished until Wednesday,  September 1st.   We apologize for  any
inconvenience this may cause.


FYI

Vince

P.S.  Rita, Please, cc Shirley on all my msgs.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
05:11 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rita Hennessy @ ENRON                           01/10/2001 11:37 AM

To: James Hachen/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya .Tamarchenko@enron.com, David.Roberts@enron.com,
lpederse@enron.com, Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir
Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Pardo/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re-Schedule - Meeting - EAM VaR

NOTE: The day and time has changed.

Please put the following meeting on your calendars: NOTE: The day and time
has changed

Subject: EAM VaR
Date:  Wednesday, January 17, 2001
Time:  1:00pm - 2:00pm
Place:  EB2868

Thanks,
Rita
33075

	From:  Rita Hennessy                           01/09/2001 10:59 AM

To: Sheila Pardo/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Meeting - EAM VaR

---------------------- Forwarded by Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron on 01/09/2001
10:58 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rita Hennessy                           01/09/2001 10:50 AM

To: Tanya.Tamarchenko@enron.com, David.Roberts@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Meeting - EAM VaR

---------------------- Forwarded by Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron on 01/09/2001
10:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rita Hennessy                           01/09/2001 10:33 AM

To: James Hachen/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya .Tamarchenko@enron.com, David.Roberts@enron.com,
lpederse@enron.com, Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir
Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Meeting - EAM VaR

Please put the following meeting on your calendars:

Subject: EAM VaR
Date:  Tuesday, January 16, 2001
Time:  9:00am - 10:00am
Place:  EB2868

Please advise if there is a conflict.

Thanks,
Rita
33075


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Joe Parks" <jparks1@houston.rr.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joe+20Parks+22+20+3Cjparks1+40houston+2Err+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:20 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	Fw: external weather links

----- Original Message -----
From: <Joe.Parks@enron.com>
To: <jparks1@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: Fwd: external weather links

>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Parks/Corp/Enron on 03/21/2001
> 08:09 AM ---------------------------
>
>
> Robyn Zivic
> 02/22/2001 04:43 PM
>
> To:   Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
>       Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
>       Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
>       Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff
>       Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Fwd: external weather links
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Robyn Zivic/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001
> 04:38 PM ---------------------------
>
>
> "robyn zivic" <robyn_zivic@hotmail.com> on 02/22/2001 01:21:50 PM
>
> To:   robyn.zivic@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Fwd: external weather links
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Dronet, David" <David.Dronet@ENRON.com>
> >To: <robyn_zivic@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: external weather links
> >Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:42:57 -0600
> >
> >Robyn,
> >
> >    Please find attached an Excel sheet with all the external
> >weather links from the gas site.
> >
> >Let me know if I can be of further help,
> >
> >David Dronet
> >xt53482
> >
> >  <<Weather Links.xls>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> (See attached file: Weather Links.xls)
>
>
>
>

 - Weather Links.xls


SK - I printed this & put it in your working group file.  mm

Team--attached are my group's top 10 objectives at the headquarters level and
at the in-country level for the international PR, marketing communication and
social responsibility areas.

How we prioritize

We arrive at these objectives after discussion with heads of the business
units and senior management, and we focus on goals that support the priority
business goals of the company and build/protect the reputation of the company
as a whole.  On a quarterly basis (at least) we review these top objectives
and ensure that we are staying on target.  Internationally, we are faced with
numerous issues and crises which must be dealt with and they also take on a
priority spot when they occur.

There is an issue with prioritization that we must constantly deal with.
Some of our clients are PR savvy and wish to use our services, which should
please us except that sometimes small, low priority and visibility projects
use too much of our time that should be spent elsewhere.  Conversely, we
sometimes have important projects that the developer wishes to keep low
budget and we are not allowed to have the level of input that we should.

How human and financial resources are allocated

The bulk of our human resources currently are allocated to the regions, and
the structure is an area in transition since the reorganization and in light
of several open positions that we have.  We determine in conjunction with the
business units the proper number and level of staff.  The regional PR head
determines how his or her junior people are assigned.  At the headquarters
level, we focus on the activities that benefit the company overall as well as
top priority countries.  Marketing communication maintains adequate staff to
meet customer demands, and adds temporary staff during peak periods.

We all work on the highest priority items for the year, but also tend to
focus on issues of the moment that are of greatest significance to the
business unit leaders.   My goal is to keep people focused on the long-term
objectives for the year and not get caught up in the day to day operations
without this long term focus.  If there is an area I would like to further
refine, it is making sure that we are better deploying our human resources on
what is important.

How financial resources are allocated

We have a PR budget for each operating company, for international
headquarters, for marketing services and for sustainable development.  At the
regional level, figures are projected for each country and/or project and
these are discussed with the various country leaders.  Headquarters budget is
used for activities that benefit all areas and not one region or country.

Marketing communication budget is on a bill-back basis (the most difficult to
predict because it is comprised of costs for developing presentations and
other marketing/sales tools.  This has been a trait of the former EI and is
the expectation of developers--if you need it for marketing purposes you do
it.)  As you will note in my objectives, I would like this department to
arrange a billing system including their time and fixed costs that allows
them to be completely self-supporting rather than allocating across business
units.  This will encourage people to use their services more wisely.

When a new project is being pursued, budgets are approved for all aspects of
the project including PR, employee communication and social responsibility.
The social responsibility budgets typically fall short or are non-existent,
and this is another area that we will be focusing on changing this year.

How this fits with budgeting process

Our allocation of resources is linked directly with our budgeting process.
There are two exceptions:

1--pursuing major projects that were not planned at the beginning of the
year.  Budgets for these new pursuits are approved during the overall project
approval process, and again, we must work to have greater input in this
process.

2--costs for resolving major crises such as Cuiaba and Human Rights Watch
have been significant and were not pre-budgeted.


Hi Guys,

In a conversation with GE today, they indicated that they thought it would be
appropriate to insert the performance values in the text of the document, and
do away with the exhibit.  Frankly, I like that approach also.  Could you
please make that revision and resend the document?

Thanks,

Kay


Looks like there is movement here on the working group.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/14/99
01:22 AM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
12/13/99 12:55 PM
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Full Unbundling of Distribution Companies in Argentina

Jane. Memo to Mike.

Jose
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/13/99 12:54 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
12/13/99 10:59 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: Full Unbundling of Distribution Companies in Argentina

FYI

Jose

---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/13/99 10:57 AM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
12/10/99 09:45 PM
To: Mike G Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Wasaff/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E
Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Full Unbundling of Distribution Companies in Argentina

Mike.

This is one of the policy issues we need to reconcile, not only internally in
our region but also because of contradictory policy positions in other
regions as well. This is one of the Agenda Items in our regulatory plan for
2000. We will establish a working group to look at the issue and the final
outcome will be a position statement of what Enron stands for.  We know that
our "flag themes" are competition and customer choices, but  we need to be
more concrete on situations that require a "close system" as a pre-condition
for infrastructure development, and then a position of a migration approach
or milestones to provide greater access and customer choice.

The context is that there are substantial differences in the stage of market,
regulatory, and infrastructure development in the regions and specific areas
within the regions ; from "greenfield distribution development opportunity"
in the southern states of Brazil, to a more mature situation in Argentina and
elsewhere.  We need to explore these differences and state what are we
willing to defend.

The answer "Brazil distribution system is close because it  is in the
Constitution or in the concessions contracts" is not very uplifting. The
position "All distribution companies have to allow for full access of all
customers to their selected supplier" does not address the practical issue of
greenfield development.   We need to develop a different answer.

WE SHOULD NOT ASK OTHERS TO WORK UNDER RULES THAT WE WOULD NOT AGREE TO WORK
UNDER!!!

 WE SHOULD MEAN WHAT WE SAY AND ACT AS WE SAY!!!

In order to get an answer that would be accepted not only in our region but
also globally; we need to explore this issue through a task force.  The first
task will be to draft a recommendation and later to have it reviewed by
Executive Management.

The key people in our region for this are:

Business Units heads:  Mike Guerriero, Rick Waddell/Orlando Pupin  (George
Wasaff and Pete Wielder do you want to get involved now?)

Gas Regulation:  Mike Smith, Guillermo Canovas

Outside the Region:  Jane Wilson, (I am soliciting other names to get a input
of other experiences in the USA. I will have them later on). We need to
plan     for their time commitment.

Mike Guerriero has a window of opportunity in Argentina because he is a new
comer. In order to be productive and do it on a fast time table I would like
you to organize the meetings and the inputs. Let's set a tentative target to
get the draft out at the end of January . You need to consult with the other
people, provide us with a propose plan  and make sure we set aside the time
and get the time commitment.

Thanks

Jose

Mike G Smith
12/10/99 12:05 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Wasaff/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E
Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Canovas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Gabrielle Bardet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Full Unbundling of Distribution Companies in Argentina

Guys

We should have a meeting to discuss the above topic. Mike Guerriero is
proposing that the distribution companies in Argentina should fully unbundle,
which would include that they get rid of the buying and selling of gas and
that function would basically be borne by marketers. There are some other
topics, but this is the one that needs to be discussed internally.

I propose we have a meeting at 8am Houston time on Wednesday, December 15th
which is an hour before the risk committee meetings starts. If you cannot be
there, I would appreciate you sending a representative for you. This topic
needs to be decided quickly so that a package can be put together for the
higher end of the government ready to go at the first of the year.

Gabby, could you get a call in number for everyone and distribute to everyone?

thanks

mike


With respect to the McGarret D transaction, attached for your review are two
additional documents which relate to the payoff of the McGarret B series:

Termination of Independent Auctioneer Ltr Agmt (260162); and
Receipt.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 260166.wpd
 - 260162.wpd
 - 260166.doc
 - 260162.doc


Ellen,

Attached is the letter we would like signed appointing Enline Solutions agent
for Jefferson-Cocke County Utility District.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Stacy


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  JobsOnline is giving away $10,000 instant cash!
		JobsOnline is one of the Internet's leading sites for employment information
and career resources. Search their extensive database of over 200,000 job
postings to make your next career move. And use the site,s valuable career
resources to assist you in your job search ) or to succeed in your current
position. Click  here for more details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Monday December 4, 2000

		Jeremiah 33.14

		The Access Bible, NRSV, Old Testament, Page 1016

		"The days are surely coming, says the LORD, when I will fulfill the promise I
made to the house of Israel and the house of Judah."

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
eGreetings! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		 Holiday gift shopping made easy...
		It's Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		   Want Coupons, FREESTUFF, & More? Click Into CoolSavings
		CoolSavings is the place to save BIG on all your favorite things from all
your favorite stores and online retailers this Holiday season.

		   Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Iyanla Vanzant: In the Meantime

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Left Behind

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Olaf Olafsson: The Journey Home

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Enya: A Day Without Rain

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		Nintendo: Hey You, Pikachu!

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		George Clooney: The Perfect Storm

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		Fantasia 2000

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow.
		- Plato

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  Does "email program" mean "geek Greek" to you?
		Don't let email confuse you! Get FREE Outlook 2000 tips from EMAZING. Soon
you'll be setting up folders, sending tricky attachments, customizing your
views, and scheduling appointments. It's as easy as 1-2-3 with these tips!
Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


CONFIDENTIAL:
JOINT DEFENSE - HENDRICKS

Attached is the Powerex v. PX complaint, which was filed yesterday in the
Central District and assigned to Judge Lew.

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619) 236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
transmission.  It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and to
delete this transmission with any attachments and destroy all copies in any
form.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 <<Powrex.pdf>>

 - Powrex.pdf


Thanks in advance for agreeing to speak at the Global Operations Controller
Forum.  Dress for the forum is casual, so feel free to do the same.  There
will be approximately 30 Enron business controllers present at the meeting.
All have responsibility for mid and back office operations for the following
Enron entities:  Enron North America, Enron Europe, Enron South America,
Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Broadband Services and
Enron Energy Services.  Attendees will be here from Houston, Calgary, Tokyo,
Sydney, London and New York (metals business).

Attached for your reference is the agenda. There may be some slight changes
before the forum begins, but this will give you a good idea of the topics to
be covered and the other speakers who will address the group.

You and I talked about Monday or Tuesday afternoon, October 23 or 24.  I have
tentatively put you on the agenda over lunch on Tuesday as detailed below.
I hope that you can join us for lunch and address the group either before or
after you eat - your choice on that.  I will call Peggy to check on your
schedule, and if this does not work we can rearrange.

Date:  Tuesday, October 24, 2000
Time:  Noon
  (lunch will be served from 12:00 to 1:30)
Place:  The Warwick Hotel
  The Versailles Room - 12th Floor
  5701 Main Street
  Houston,  TX  77005

I have noted that your topic will be Technology's vision for supporting
global trading operations.  I know that the group would also like to hear
about what is going on in Enron Networks.  We can alter the topic as you
would like.
Let me know if you have any questions and thanks again for joining us.


It's been changed - sorry.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/07/2001 08:33 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re:

539859 should be PG&E Energy Trading-Power

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/07/2001 10:23 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

539859 - buy PGET
539861 - sell EES

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/07/2001 08:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Hi Kate,
What's the status of these two deals?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/06/2001 05:41 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/06/ Checkout

Evelyn, I'm so sorry I haven't found these deals yet! I've left messages with
Mike Swerzbin and Matt Motley, but I don't see these trades in either of
their logs - or even in the short term trade logs. One of those guys should
be back in the office momentarily, and I'll let you know when I've talked to
them.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/06/2001 03:15 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/06/ Checkout

Amerex West
All deals checked out fine.

Bloomberg
All deals checked out fine.

Prebon

Mike Swerbin
I am missing the following deals:
Enron buys from PGET 25 mw of May PV at $272
Enron sells to EES 25 mw of May PV at $268.


You sound so pitiful.  I haven't forgotten you!

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/23/2001 06:31 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com @ ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

I haven't seen this. I guess that's what happens when you get passed over...

Ben

Kay.Mann@enron.com on 01/23/2001 11:45:27 AM
To: Ben.jacoby@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

Hi Ben,

Has anyone asked you to take a look at this?  If not, I would be interested
in your comments.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 11:42
AM ---------------------------

From: Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 11:24 AM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  FW: Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

Sorry about that.
(See attached file: AGENDA eecc-ena mtg.doc)(See attached file: ENA Project
Dev Process v2 clean.doc)

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Clark, Catherine
Sent:     Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:15 AM
To:       Mann, Kay
Cc:       Bills, Lisa
Subject:  Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

Kay,
Lisa asked me to see if you would represent ENA Legal at the meeting
between EE&CC and ENA on Monday, Jan 29th.  Having worked at both
companies, you would add a lot of insight to the crafting of a "new project
development process".  The agenda is for Ozzie, Mike Coleman, Lisa and you
to give brief presentations (5-10 minutes each) on the project development
process, with recommendations on changes to be made.  You've already seen
the notes, but I'm attaching an updated version.

Please let me know if you will be available and if you want to change any
discussion bullets and/or recommendations.  The most recent message had the
meeting taking place on Monday, January 29th from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm (with
lunch provided).  Megan will let everyone know which room will be reserved.
There is also a pre-meeting tomorrow (Wed) at 10:30 am in EB 2868 (it
should only last 30 minutes).  Thank you in advance for your help.
-Catherine
x3-9943

 - AGENDA eecc-ena mtg.doc
 - ENA Project Dev Process v2 clean.doc


i got your tickets

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 03/30/2001 08:51:12 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: funnies

?
 - fortune.jpg
 - bombtech.jpg
 - airolane.jpg
 - watchp.jpg


What is the post id you're looking at?  Mine from Monday (1452848) shows 0 value.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McPearson, Shannon
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:00 PM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	NG Can

I am pulling a liquidated value for the NG Canadian book. I am showing expense of (456,816). The counterparty names for these deals are FT Canada. The DPR currently shows a zero liquidated value.

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


for calendar, especially 930

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/29/2001 03:01
PM ---------------------------
From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 02:59 PM
To: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lorie Leigh/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Call w/ TECO tomorrow at 10:30 Central

TECO has asked that we schedule our call for tomorrow at 10:30 AM. Kay, I
would like to meet with you at 9:30 to discuss the MOU. I don't believe their
counsel will be on the call at 10:30, therefore your participation is
optional (although you know we'd always prefer to have you).

Regards,

Ben

Lorie:

Please put the TECO call on my and Fred's calendar. Thanks.


Anyone there?  Helloooooo!


1. &Ancillary Services8 or &AS8 means those services required by Entergy,s
interconnection agreement with MDEA or Entergy,s tariff.
OR
&Ancillary Services8 or &AS8 means those services recognized by Entergy,s
interconnect agreement with MDEA or Entergy,s tariff.
2.&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of MDEA,s Native Load.
OR
&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of (i) MDEA,s Native Load, and (ii) the Energy required to
be sold under any Existing Transactions, up to the total amount of Energy on
any day that can be produced from the Facilities.
3.&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of MDEA,s Native Load.
OR
&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of (i) MDEA,s Native Load, and (ii) the Energy required to
be sold under any Existing Transactions, up to the total amount of Energy on
any day that can be produced from the Facilities.
4.&Confirmation8 means a confirmation of a transaction or transactions.
OR
&Confirmation8 means the document provided for under the MPPSA or the MGPSA
and with the corresponding third party under a Back-to-Back Transaction or
with EPMI which specifies the Product being bought or sold, the duration of
the Transaction and the other terms, including price. A daily report of all
hourly (or similarly short term) purchases and sales will be provided to the
Customer and shall serve as a Confirmation for those transactions under the
MPPSA or MGPSA.
5.&Delivery Point8 means the busbar of the respective Facilities located at
the interconnection between CPUC,s and YCPSC,s respective transmission
systems at the 115 kV switching station at the respective interconnections
with the Entergy transmission system.
Or
&Delivery Point8 &Point of Delivery8 or &POD8 means (a) for power (i) the
interfaces  located at the interconnection between Clarksdale and Yazoo City
transmission systems at the  Entergy system, or (ii) the point specified in
any Back-to-Back Transaction, EPMI Transaction or Structured Transaction at
which Products are to be tendered under a Confirmation; (b) for natural gas,
(i) for Clarksdale, the point of interconnection between Texas Gas and
Clarksdale (ii) for Yazoo City, the interconnection between Southern Natural
Gas (Sonat) and Mississippi Valley Gas for the Yazoo City Power Plant (the
Sonat Delivery Point) (iii) the interconnection between Mississippi Valley
Gas (MVG) and the Yazoo City Power Plant (MVG Delivery Point), (iv) any point
where fuel is delivered as specified in a Fuel Transaction.
6.&Incentive Fee8 means forty percent (40%) of the Savings and of the net
profit from external sales of the Cities, natural gas resources and the
purchase of on-peak Energy, as calculated in accordance with Article III of
this ILA.
Or
&Incentive Fee8 means the fee described in [Section].
7.&Market Price8 is the price agreed by the parties to be paid by EPMI in any
EPMI Transaction for the sale of Energy to third parties, or the amount to be
paid to EPMI for the sale of Energy to the Cities and/or MDEA.
or
&Market Price8 is the price agreed to (i) by any third party for the sale or
purchase to or from EPMI or MDEA in a Back-to-Back Transaction, (ii) the
price paid by EPMI in any EPMI Transaction or (iii) by any third party
pursuant to any Structured Transaction.
8. &Protocols8 shall mean the SPP Protocols duly adopted by SPP, including
any attachments or exhibits referenced thereby, as amended from time to time,
containing the scheduling, operating, planning, reliability, and settlement
(including customer registration) policies, rules, guidelines, procedures,
standards, and criteria of SPP.  For the purposes of determining
responsibilities and rights at a given time, the Protocols, as amended in
accordance with the change procedure(s) described in the Protocols, in effect
at the time of the performance or non-performance of an action, shall govern
with respect to that action.
or
&Protocols8 shall mean the Protocols duly adopted by SPP, SERC, NERC, and/or
Entergy, including any attachments or exhibits referenced thereby, as amended
from time to time, containing the scheduling, operating, planning,
reliability, and settlement (including customer registration) policies,
rules, guidelines, procedures, standards, and operations criteria.  For the
purposes of determining responsibilities and rights at a given time, the
Protocols, as amended in accordance with the change procedure(s) described in
the Protocols, in effect at the time of the performance or non-performance of
an action, shall govern with respect to that action.
9.&Savings8 shall mean the difference between 1) the total costs to MDEA
and/or the Cities of a Transaction, and 2) the total costs of MDEA and/or the
Cities avoided or displaced by the Transaction, which difference shall be
calculated as described in Article III of this ILA.
not defined in rev 23 definitions


Talked at length with Mark Baldwin today.  Could you give me a call when you get a chance to discuss?  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

415.782.7822


hi nana
its micael


Please start drafting the intervention, as you've described and send me an
estimate for the RCR.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 03:08 PM
---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 02/20/2001 08:24 AM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mirant Complaint

Please follow up.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 08:24 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	02/16/2001 02:52 PM

		 To: <jsteffe@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <rsanders@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mirant Complaint

Robin Gibbs called and said that he agreed that we should intervene and
support Mirant on the ISO credit issue.  He said that Mirant's complaint is
consistent with the jurisdictional issues that he and Richard have been
working on.  Let me know if you would like an RCR estimate.   Ron


yeah - he can play if he doesn't mind playing only def

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME WEDNEDSDAY @ 7:00

i am in.  do you need anyone else to play b/c chad wants to play if we have
room.  we could always use another pass rusher.


a special request from Mr. Lay


Attached is a presentation for your review that illustrates a new method for curtailment of transactions that is still based on CPM, but give partial-credit for varying levels of firmness in a stack.

As you probably know, when a transaction leg is supported by multiple transmission reservations it is referred to as a "stack" of transmission; specifically, a vertical stack.  Under the current curtailment procedures under which we operate, such a stack is always valued at the LOWEST curtailment priority of the stack.  In other words, if I combine 50MW of firm transmission and 50MW of Non-Firm Secondary, my 100MW of transmission capacity is now treated as if it ALL had a curtailment priority of 1.  Further, if an off-path constraint occurs, the entire transaction is treated with a priority of 1, even if every other leg is Firm.

As I'm sure you can see, this stinks.  So I have drafted up a proposal for what I think is a better way of doing this.  Under the proposal, 50MW would be treated as priority 1, while the other 50 would be treated as Firm.  This would reduce the SIZE on-path curtailments and off-path curtailments.  As far as whether it increases or decrease the NUMBER of transactions curtailed, that will depend on several different factors (how prevalent stacking is, how often stacks vary in firmness, etc...).

Please review and give comments, as I plan to present to the IDCWG in a few weeks.  It is my opinion that this is a good idea, but I want to make sure you all (and any others you think should be asked) agree.

Andy Rodriquez
Senior Regulatory Specialist - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Jack Urquhart has inquired as to his continuing role for providing oversight of the Trojan decommissioning.  I think he sits on the review committee.  Please give your thoughts on this.  I think we need someone from Enron on the committee but given Jack's changing role he may or may not be the right person.  Please acknowledge receipt of this given our email difficulties.  Thanks

Stan


Here's the latest revision inserting the drawing numbers.  Is it ready to go
to GE?

Scott, payment for change orders is addressed in the contract.


Rick and Ted,

It looks more like foxes building chicken houses as opposed to foxes guarding
chicken houses.

I shall send a message to Bryan saying that the Research has to look under
the hood and examine the mechanics
of the model in order to sign off on it. A dog and pony show is not
sufficient. In any case, the decision to approve
the model should not be left to Ben and Kirstee.

Please, let me know what your thinking is.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
01:31 PM ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
11/10/2000 03:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VaR for EnronCredit.com

Vince/Steve -- we are going to the Board in December to ask for formal
limits.  As you know one of the key limits at the Board level is Value at
Risk. To that end, it is imperative that you are comfortable with our
approach for calculating VaR.  We have implemented a third party risk system
which holds all of our positions and are in the process of putting the debt
positions in.  The system has a VaR engine which is being demo'd by the
vendor today.  Ben and Kirstee are attending the demo and if they find the
technology acceptable, I propose moving forward with implemantion of the
module.  Pls. let me know if this sounds reasonable and how you would
envision implementing.

thanks


Teco Tap       40.000 / Enron ; 53.125 / HPL IFERC


just fyi.  dan bump will be conferenced in on our meeting.  mark will be out
of the office.

joan


Dear Mr. Skilling:

I write on behalf of Jerry Murdock, who is currently in Europe.  Mr. Murdock
asked me to pass on the following information regarding your telephone call
scheduled for 10:00am (CST) on Tuesday, May 15.

Insight Capital hosts a quarterly dinner with Robert Rubin and Steve
Friedman and other selected guests.  Our next dinner is scheduled for July
19 and will be held in Aspen, Colorado.  The Current State of the Global
Market will be one of the topics under discussion and Jack Welch of GE is
one of your fellow invitees.

The purpose of your conversation with Mr. Murdock is to discuss the above in
more detail and to more fully brief you on the purpose of these dinners.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further
information.

Erica Harris
Insight Capital Partners
680 Fifth Avenue
8th Floor
New York, NY  10019
(212) 230-9276

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the message,
is strictly forbidden.


Yes, I think that we discussed this.  This is the KEY slide to combat
Balkanization.  I'm working with Alan and Steve Walton on it.  Can you please
check with Alan to see if Jennifer has completed, or will complete, the
analysis soon?  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


What it the abbreviation for our website?


When: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:30 PM-3:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3259

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


See attached report

kurt


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 02:51 PM -----

	Steve C Hall
	02/01/2001 02:19 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jklauber@llgm.com
		 cc: robin_tompkins@pgn.com
		 Subject: CalPX Termination Letter


I just got a fax in from WestLB with a couple of changes. (cringe) What's
your fax number?

To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ABB Final Draft

Kay:

I haven't heard from you regarding Scott Dieball's comments which he faxed to
us yesterday.  Did you get a copy?

Please let me know if you didn't and I'll get a copy to you.

Kathy


Steve, what I have on my board is that when cubix did the test for 703 the engine load was 89%.  If Cubix is willing to provide us a report that shows the load on 703 to be greater than 90%, we've satisified the compliance testing for 703.  Id like to have a copy of the revised report to submit to the Air Quality Bureau for their records and the facility should also have copy.  My records show that the ceiling for using unit 702 is 68% load.  Under our agreement with the AQB, we can operate unit 702 ONLY UP TO A 68% LOAD.  Above this, we need to bring in Cubix or have a portable test completed to raise the ceiling of operation.  One other thing, there seem to be some confusion about which units are required to be tested at station 7.  I have a copy of the approval from the AQB about allowing us to test units 702 and 703 instead of 701 and 702.  Ill pass a copy of this letter on to anyone who needs it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	SanMiguel, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Mountainair, Team; Jolly, Rich; Campbell, Larry; Smith, Rick; Hendricks, Jonny
Cc:	Maestas, Gary
Subject:	Station 7: Unit 703

    Update:

      I have communicated with Rick Stallings (Cubix Corp) about an hour ago and Rick recalls our past conversation concerning the horsepower & load discrepancies for unit 703.  Rick no longer has the data in his data base, but will be glad to make the necessary adjustments with attached explanations for our records in case their are any questions.

     The corrected torque load should have been 96 %.

Larry Wayne will this work for you?

Steve


Please read this.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob
Subject:	Indian Counsel

Rob -

I'd really like to take this up today with you.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/30/2001 10:20 AM ---------------------------

Paul Kraske
05/30/2001 08:09 AM
To:	Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:	Indian Counsel

Bruce-

I think Wade spoke to you last night about some concerns I have with our Indian litigation team.  Principally I am a bit disappointed with Atul Setalvad.  You and I have discussed this a little in the past and I've shared some of my frustrations.  Ultimately, and notwithstanding my grumbling to you and Gail, I would be willing to put up with arrogance, over-billing, criticism of Enron and the project and even (grudgingly) the disrespect with which he treats me and the other DPC lawyers if I thought he could get the job done.  But I don't think he can.

He may still have some good ideas.  And he does have history with the project.  But he's slow.  And he's unresponsive to our schedule, our priorities and our instructions.  One reason we had to ask for more time from the MERC is that he simply wasn't prepared to argue yesterday.  I'm still not sure he's read MSEB's petition and I'm quite sure he has no idea what the substantive argument about misdeclaration is.  Under the glare of TV cameras and under pressure at yesterday's MERC hearing, I thought he choked.  In contrast, MSEB's advocate spoke persuasively about the PPA and the MERC.  I figure if he could get up to speed on the PPA and on misdeclaration, we can bring someone else up to speed as well.  We shouldn't be hiring the best lawyers in the UK and the States and then settling for the "B" team in India especially when MSEB has collected three of the best lawyers from  Delhi and Bombay.

I'm not looking to totally dump the guy.  Even from a prudence perspective, we should have more than one senior lawyer ready to go.  If  we are going to be waging court wars on multiple fronts and on different issues, it would be irresponsible to stick with only one counsel.  We've identified three guys to approach and I think we should get them all up to speed and involved going forward.  When we need to deploy someone in a particular matter, we can choose among the three of them (and Atul S) and pick the individual most likely to be successful.

1.	I'm meeting with P. Chidambaram here in Bombay  today.  He's opined for us on the misdeclaration issue in the past.  Very smart guy.  Former Finance Minister of India.  Well respected and someone I definitely want on our team.

2.	We've also approached Ashok Desai in the past.  Former Attorney General of India and the mentor of MSEB's lawyer (the Advocate General of Maharashtra who appeared at the MERC yesterday).  Walker thought Desai would be particularly useful given the possible effect on MSEB's lawyer of having to argue against his former boss. We're not sure he's still available but I intend to find that out. I understand he is out of the country at the moment.  But we want to approach him in Early July when he gets back.

3.	Last guy is a fellow named Parasaran.  Reputed to be one of the two best lawyers in India (the number one guy - Fali Nariman - is already working against us).  We have not spoken to him yet.  He may already have accepted a brief from MSEB, GOM or GOI.   If not, we will try to approach him.

Finally, although less urgently, I think we need more litigation support.  Shoban is terribly smart and has the same depth of experience of Atul R. and Atul S.  But he's ill equipped to support the fight we're undertaking.  He has no associates.  He has no secretaries.  He can't research case law.  He's only available from 10 - 6.  When we need to prepare submissions to court, inevitably he calls us up and sheepishly asks whether we can do it ourselves.  Which we've stayed here late at night in the past and done.  But I'm not sure we can handle procedural litigation support on top of everything else we're doing.

Again, I'm not proposing we replace him.  And I'm not even sure we have a firm in mind to help out with this stuff right at the moment (we're considering 1.  Desai & Diwanji, 2. Amarchand and 3. A firm called Doijode & Phartephekar).  But I do think we're going to need a firm to back us up with junior associates willing to pull cases and crunch out filings 24 hours a day.  Again, no point in putting together a crack legal team from the States and England when we can't deliver the goods here in Bombay.

I realize the risk of suggesting new players.  If we tank, the first thing Jim and Rob will ask is "Why did we ever change from Setalvad?  Who are these new guys?"  quickly followed by "Paul Kraske has left Enron to pursue other interests".  But I would be remiss not to bring my reservations to your attention and to strongly suggest that we add more guys to the team.  I'm also willing to have this discussion with Rob and, if necessary, with Jim.  Atul R. is still preparing the writ petition but I want to act a little quickly on the Senior Counsel front so we can line up either Ashok Desai or Chidambaram to argue the writ before the High Court.

Let me know what you think.

Paul

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Tim and Murray,

Yesterday the real-time desk experienced dropped Terminal Server (TS)
sessions which impacted their productivity. Diana and Chip contacted the
network team in Houston to assist with troubleshooting the problem. Keith
Dziadek monitored the DS3 VPN connection between Portland and Houston and has
determined that it is the dynamic fail-over within the Enron Intelligent
Network (EIN) which is causing the dropped TS sessions. This dynamic
fail-over is a good thing. Our issue is that the sensitivity of the TS
sessions is so high that the time of the dynamic fail-over on the EIN causes
them to drop while all other applications (i.e. Enpower running locally in
Portland) are not affected.

Keith is meeting with his team in Houston as well as staff from EBS today to
form an action plan. Once the action plan has been established, Keith or I
will communicate what and when it will be done to you via email.

You can reach me on my cel if you have any questions.

Regards,

Dan Dietrich
Cel: 403-818-0815

---------------------- Forwarded by Diana Willigerod/PDX/ECT on 11/26/2000
03:33 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip Platter                           11/26/2000 03:19 PM

To: Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Willigerod/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chip Cox/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kane/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: IT problems Sunday

Please be advised of a serious problem with Terminal Server!

We were all kicked out of Terminal Server consistently on Sunday.  At first
it happened about every half hour (9am to 10:30a.m).  Then it happened every
5 minutes.
Communication seemed slow.  We paged and called the Portland IT Team at
11:30  (Diana & Chip).  At 12noon Diana said Chip and Paul Kane were working
on it.   At around  12:30 Paul Kane called back and said "Vince" in Houston
was working on it.  We asked for Vince's Phone number and Paul stated that
Vince would call us instead. Vince called at about 1:00 and said everything
was now working.  Five minutes later we were still getting kicked out.   We
then paged and called Chip and he said he was trying to get ahold of
Houston.  At 1:30 we called the Resolution Center. They indicated they had no
clue we were having problems. At 1: 45 we called Greg Marsalis in Houston and
he said he was unaware of who was working on it, but was going to look into
it.

Greg did look into it and said they were still not able to pinpoint the
problem.  At this writing,(3:10p.m.) we are still not able to use Terminal
Server  and consequently are unable to transact with the ISO or to enter
deals in enpower.  This has also affected our connection to PX Trade App.  We
are effectively prevented from taking advantage of market conditions in
California.  Earlier I had started to initiate some congestion relief  on the
Palo Verde tie .  Cong was $225 to $250 at Palo and I was confident I could
take advantage by moving power out of SP.  I was unable to do anything in
Caps as I was kicked out every few minutes.

I feel the communication process regarding this problem has been flawed.  I'm
sure there is plenty of blame to go around .  I suggest we meet with IT  to
define a process where we will get immediate attention and results.

As of 3:20 we still have the same problems.

I am hoping this problem is isolated to Sunday.


I think that this makes sense.  I'd appreciate your thoughts?

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 07:14 AM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/15/2001 06:20 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Project Requires RCR

The following project requires RCR:

Project Lead: Susan J Mara

Project Name: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA

RCR Title: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA

Proposed Expenditure: $2,300.00

To see more detail on this project, click on the following link >>>


I agree that we should saya minimum term of five years. The in-service date
will depend on exactly what mods need to be done which will not be defined
until Friday or Monday but we need canvass the market now since the timing is
right. The in-service could hopefully be even earlier.

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           12/04/2000 08:25 AM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

First,  I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter??  confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone
wants to bid for a longer term they can--
Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed
above-
Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again.

MK

Steven Harris
12/04/2000 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some
available and were not looking to expand there.

Drew Fossum
12/04/2000 07:57 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group.  Should we also solicit
turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal.
border to Thoreau?  Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained
segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on?  DF

Lindy Donoho
12/01/2000 02:22 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Draft Open Season Posting

Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion.  Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!


Dear Valued Customer,

We've got great news.  There is a new feature for you, our subscribers.

At BusinessWeek Online we are always trying to make our Subscriber's
experience easier and more fulfilling.  To that end, we have recently enabled
BusinessWeek Online with  "Auto Log-In" functionality.

What does this mean to you?  "Auto Log-In" will allow you to access premium
content at BusinessWeek.com without going through the step of entering you
user name and password each and every time you visit.

Simply click on the link below and sign-in and check the box for auto log-in:

http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a14110a27878a63653009a0

Once you have enabled "Auto Log-In," you'll be able to go directly to the
most current issue of BusinessWeek Magazine as well as easily access 5 years
worth of searchable archives without ever having to log-in again.  You'll be
able to access BusinessWeek Online faster and more efficiently than ever
before.

Thanks for your continued support,

Greg Zorthian,

SVP BusinessWeek Online

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you've received this message in error or wish
to cancel your subscription to this service, click here:

http://www.you-click.net/Change-Remove/a14110a63653009a1


Please deal with this.  I never saw a document from you on the last public
record request.  Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 05:12 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
02/01/2001 04:41 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Further Public Record Act Request from the San Jose
Mercury News to the EOB

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 02/01/2001 04:41
PM ---------------------------

"Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com> on 02/01/2001 04:40:15 PM
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:

Subject: CAISO Notice: Further Public Record Act Request from the San Jose
Mercury News to the EOB

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

On January 24 the EOB received a further Public Record Act request from the
San Jose Mercury News for information that may include information provided
by the ISO to the EOB and may include information subject to ISO tariff
section 20.3.  Attached please find the Public Record Act request and the
letter from the EOB forwarding the request to the ISO.  Market Participants
wishing to provide comments to the EOB on the request should submit such
comments directly to the EOB.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Public R.pdf


what is this?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-enron+5Fupdate+40concureworkplace+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:26 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Hunter Shively
Report Name:   Customer Meeting with Peoples Energy.
Report Date:   8/14/01
Report ID:     19324BA6902611D59279
Submitted On:  8/14/01

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


Title: Current Crisis and the Southern Cone Gas and Power Markets
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2752;

***********************************************************************

In an October 18, 2001 CERA Conference Call and Web Presentation, Barbara
Mattos, Jed Bailey, and Otavio Mielnik discussed:

*  Southern Cone Economic Update

*  New Drivers for Power Supply and Demand

*  Natural Gas Supply and Demand

Please follow the above URL to view and listen to a replay of this CERA
conference call playback. When the Premiere Conferencing PlaceWare window
opens, simply enter your name and click the "View" button. A "recording key
code" is not required.

Hosted by Premiere Conferencing

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Playback
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Southern Cone Gas & Power

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


I just got this from Cute Blazer Guy - thought you might like to distribute
it to the Origination team in case people want to partake in some more Blazer
mania...

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/19/2000 10:43 AM
---------------------------

Ryan Langan <ryan.langan@ripcity.com> on 12/19/2000 09:42:06 AM
To: "'kate.symes@enron.com'" <kate.symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Blazers Holiday Ticket Special!

> Blazers Holiday Ticket Special
>
> Games
>
> Dec. 23    Blazers vs. Wizards
> Dec.29  Blazers vs. Grizzlies
> Jan. 1  Blazers vs. Hornets
>
> Each ticket includes
>
> $5 Blazer Bucks (good for food and beverage in the arena)
>
> Free Poster!  your choice of:
>
> Rasheed Wallace
> Arvydas Sabonis
> Scottie Pippen
>
> Special Rate    Regular Rate
>
> $15 Purple Section        $23
> * upper level sidelines
>
> $15 Brown Section        $16
> * upper level corners
>
> $14 Red Section        $16
> * upper level endzone (front half)
>
> $10 Tan Section         $10
> * upper level endzone (back half)
>
>
> To see a map with the colored sections go to http://www.blazers.com and
> click on arena and tickets...
>
> For tickets please call Ryan Langan @ 503-797-9936 or e-mail @
> ryan.langan@ripcity.com
>
> Happy holidays!


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Perry Frazier/ET&S/Enron on 12/20/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

Perry Frazier
12/11/2000 03:14 PM
To: Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: POGO interconnect Lea County New Mexico.

Christine:

POGO has requested a new interconnect with TW in Sec. 18, T22S, R32E of Lea
County New Mexico.  There is a 4" on 24" existing tap at station # 612+14
between Mile Post 11 & 12 south of WT-I, indentified by the local operations
team.  The cost estimate below contains the usual and customary facility and
equipment costs:

 Chromatograph     $55,000
 H2O Monitor     $10,000
 H2S Monitor     $35,000
 EFM      $35,000
 Flow control     $34,000
 Positive shut-in     $22,000
 Flow bypass     $12,000
 Engi. CSUP, Contig.  $120,000
  Subtotal  $323,000

 Tax Gross-up   $100,000
  Total                       $423,000

These cost are identical to the EOG +/- 10% numbers from the E&C Team.  Once
again, the turn around time is generally 90 days from work order generation
to in-service reporting.  The equipment best case delivery is 45 days with
about a 5 day turn around time in construction.

Let me know if you have any questions or need further assistance.  3-0667


Your approval is required for William Smith to attend the following class.
To grant approval, send a reply to "lpharr@enron.com" (NotesMail: LeRea
Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT).
  Be sure to include employee's name and class number in reply.

Excel 97, Introduction
Session Dates & Times:
  3/23/2000  8:30:00 AM-3:00:00 PM
Location: EB568
No Show/Participant Fee: $ 150.00

If you have any questions, please call the Technology Training Coordinator at
713-853-1816.


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/02/2001>, published as of 11/02/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


So what should I do with this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 10:29 AM -----

	Mark Holsworth@ENRON
	01/19/2001 10:20 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

The only way to know exactly what agreements are outstanding is to do an
audit of the software.  Many of the agreements have been taken in Enron
Corp.'s name which is the company policy.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	01/19/2001 09:18 AM

		 To: Gene Diers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Holsworth/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 09:18 AM -----

	Louise Kitchen
	01/19/2001 08:38 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

Did you include Gene Diers and Mark holdsworth

From: Tana Jones on 01/18/2001 06:40 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carmen Ayala/Enron@enronXgate, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Hillier/Enron@enronXgate, Paul
Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

Attached is what I hope is a pretty complete list of the EnronOnline
contracts I have been made aware of.  There are a few I have open questions
about  or am waiting to receive copies of the contract.  Can each of you
please take a look and think about whether there are any others we may be
missing.  Again, my time frame is short here, so if I can get your response
promptly I would be most appreciative.


Louise,

Stay in touch.  I expect I'll be out of here pretty soon.

Our contact details just in case you don't have them are:

Beech Coppice
Woodland Way
Kingswood
Tadworth
Surrey
KT20 6NW

tel +44 (0)1737 830513
fax +44 (0) 1737 830581
e-mail: matthew.scrimshaw@btinternet.com

Hope you all get back OK.

Matthew


Further to our conversation, pls release $ 1,004,000 US funds to the Canadian
Orig Desk Head, Eric Ledain.

These funds will come out of the prudency account that has been set up to
distribute these payment obligations.

Gerald, I would like to raise a confirm between ENA and ECC that stipulates
why we are paying them these amounts.

Total payment was in consideration of ECC syndication of PCHC and Misako of
which the granted amount on Misako was $ 200,000 .

If there are any questions, give me a call.

BT


Darren,  we had a situation in December that we need your help to resolve.

Deal #125836 We have been purchasing gas from Cox Exploration on PG&E
Hydorcarbons systems upstream of the processing facility.  This purchase
agreement terminated 11/30/99.  I didn't path the gas on PGEH, however, I
will take responsibility for not adjusting the interconnect ticket at
Thompsonville.  I didn't catch this and the Deal on the HPL side appeared to
be a valid flow issue for Kim Vaughn.  The plant continued to confirm this
gas.

We have tried working through the pipeline, but they state that they will not
know anything until the 15th.  Can you contact the producer and ask them to
reverify this with the pipeline?  I would like Kim to be able to zero confirm
and send back to Pops so Volume Management will not allocate up to the
producer level.

Also I just realized that we have a committed reserve purchase agreement at
the same meter with Tribo Production.  Should there have been an expected
volume in this Deal?  Is it possible that Cox exploration sold their interest
in this well to Tribo.  It may turn out that we should have flowed the gas
after all.


Question?  Read below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 01:40 PM
---------------------------

EMAZING <biblequiz-html-149525525X@emazing.com> on 10/25/2000 02:26:26 AM
To: EMAZING <biblequiz-html-149525525X@emazing.com>
cc:
Subject: EMAZING Bible Quiz of the Week - Jesus as High Priest

		EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfileFREE Richard Marx MP3!

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints- Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  Teach Your Child to Read With Hooked On Phonics!
		Are you doing enough to ensure your children success in school? Hooked on
Phonics is a fantastic program that we would recommend for parents who want
to help their children develop strong reading skills. Click  here for more
details.

		Bible Quiz of the Week
		Wednesday October 25, 2000

		Jesus as High Priest

		According to Hebrews, what qualifies Jesus as high priest?
		a. the power of his teaching
		b. his divine appointment to the role
		c. his obedience through suffering

		Answers to the Bible Quiz run every Friday!

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		You could win a FREE Bible playing Bible Quiz! Click here for Bible Quiz
Rules!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives
		[IMAGE]

		 SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Neale Walsch: Conversations With God

		Our e-cards are a scream!
		Halloween is coming, so don't be afraid to send an Emazing greeting!

		2000 Ford Taurus, yellow and black, 600HP V8, 5 speed, No AC, No AM/FM.
		Sign-up today for your FREE subscription to EMAZING.com's Auto Racing
Daybreaker and you could win Matt Kenseth's NASCAR Winston Cup racecar.

		We be jammin' on the Grapevine!
		EMAZING's Grapevine is the place for FREE and secure email chat.

		Love to read?
		Let the story come to you. Sign up for THE BOY NEXT DOOR.  A funny and
romantic mystery delivered to your email box.

		 iMotors: we find and buy the used car you want!
		In the market for a used car at a great price? Check out iMotors, the online
solution to finding a customized used car at an affordable price.

		JobsOnline is giving away $10,000 instant cash!
		JobsOnline is one of the Internet's leading sites for employment information
and career resources.

		 QUOTE OF THE DAY
		"Oh man, it's so digital," and she just meant that the relationship was on
again, off again.
		- Laurie Anderson

		 [IMAGE]

		Oy vey and Joe Lieberman...
		If that's all you know about Jewish culture, then check out EMAZING's Jewish
Culture tip! A great way to brush up on the kind of stuff that'll make your
mother proud: common word and phrase origins, traditions, celebrations,
obscure facts, and pop culture references. Get to know your neighbor -- or
yourself -- a little better. Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


Are ya'll in the new building?  If so, I will come over and check it out.

Thanks Again,

JDLIII

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Logan III, Jackson
Subject:	RE: Colorado

Sold.  I also have two End Zone passes also.  I'll bring them up here tomorrow.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Logan III, Jackson
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	RE: Colorado

Thanks alot.  I would love to use them if at all possible.  So for the late response, I was out of the office yesterday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Logan III, Jackson
Subject:	Colorado

We decided last night not to go to the Colorado game next week.  I've got two at face if you're interested.  Tough one last weekend.  It sure sucks that OU got that good that fast.  I'm out tomorrow, back on Monday.  See ya.

DG


There is an old one form the Dis OII -- The first one listed below -- it's
180 days old.  Do you know any reason why that wasn't paid?
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000 03:00 PM -----

	MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	11/27/2000 02:42 PM

		 To: "'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'" <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: One Write-Off

No problems Sue.  I think we agreed to do that after our bills were sent out
to you in early November, so that is why you would have a bill with that
amount still in your pile.  We will write it off immediately.

As I looked over the outstanding bills, the ones we really want to clear up
this asap include the following:

2704-110   $2,539.36   over 180 days old.  This is the distribution OII we
discussed that                should be approved on a
routine basis

2704-118  $6,596.45 in total covering this months bill plus two small ones
90 days and 150                days old.  This is
the Post Transition Ratemaking case, again, it
should be routine as we had an RCR in place.

2704-127   $2,031.79 over 150 days old.  This is Enron's share of the
ARM  RCS Direct Access               case.  Again, there
should not be a problem with the billings as more
recent bills have been paid.

2704-132   $21,012.22  This is the big kahuna, in the PG&E hydro case.
More recent                   amounts have all
been paid, but this 150 day old bill has not, and we
suspect it got caught in the accounting software changeover.  This is
one we would really love the find soon.

2704-140   PAID      We just got the check on Jeff's gas strategy
case.

2704-144   $2,929.08   This is Enron's share of the Electric
investigation work for ARM,                comprised of
two bills, the most recent one from early Nov. and a
$2,126.81 bill which is 90 days old.

So, those are the ones we would like to track, and if you have any problems
with any of these please let me know as soon as you can.  I will take care
of the write off on 2704-003.  Thanks for your help.    Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 2:24 PM
To: mday@gmssr.com
Cc: Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com
Subject: One Write-Off

Mike,

Re:  Bills Dated 11/08/00 Which Were Just Received by Enron

I believe you and I spoke about writing off the $30.74 owed 180 days past.
This is for "gas Miscellaneous."  If we haven't, I'd like you to write that
bill off and eliminate that matter number.  Let me know if you have any
concerns with this approach.

Thanks.

Sue


Dan,

As discussed, please find below details of Phy Gas deal:

Deal Date: 3/22/01
Deal No: QY6327 / 687279
Buyer: Royster - Clark, Inc
Seller: ENA
Start Date: 4/1/01
End Date: 3/31/06
Firm
Volume: 2,800 / day
Price: NOVA.AECO-C-US. CGPR. M.I. plus USD 0.4875

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Ellen
x54099


What do you think about the 530?  Isn't it basically the same thing
as the 330 except it's bigger?  If so, does it handle as well with the
added size and weight?

-----Original Message-----
From: Conway, Frank P [mailto:ConwayFP@navair.navy.mil]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Ruscitti, Kevin
Subject: RE:

Kev,

Real quick on the cars.  The beamer is real tight in the back seat.  Think
about how often you might be hauling 3-4 people.  If you think it's a
factor, spend some time on an extended test drive sitting in the back.  I'd
still look at the Vovlvo S-60 twin turbo, it might surprise you.

Capt. Frank P. Conway
"Sissy"
USNTPS Class 121
301.757.5079
conwayfp@navair.navy.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Conway, Frank P
Subject: RE:

I was at the game last night sitting in home run territory - section
154.
It was one of the most disappointing games i've ever attended.  the
astros
don't even deserve to make the playoffs after their cowardly play.  the
manager's an idiot - intentionally walking Bonds with guys on 1st and
2nd
with 2 outs.

Anyway, in terms of the Miata, the dealer recommended abt $1300 worth of
work.
Of course i told him to just get the thing running ($450).  The problem
is
the blue book value is only $2500 so i can't see putting another grand
into it.
I'll probably just sell it to someone who races miata's (which is really
big
in Texas) or donate it to charity and take the tax write off.

We haven't test driven anything yet but it looks like we're leaning
toward the
BMW 330i.  It seems to get great reviews, the main downside is that it's
a little
small - but still sporty.  We'll go for test drives this weekend and
should buy
or lease (still undecided) something in the next couple weeks.

How's everything on your front.  Less classroom time and more flying
time???

That faggot Lowery was in Austin this past weekend.  I don't expect him
to call
of course but it shows how easily he could've gotten to Houston while he
was
working for 8 mos. in Dallas.

Later,

kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Conway, Frank P [mailto:ConwayFP@navair.navy.mil]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Ruscitti, Kevin
Subject: RE:

Some idiot lost a pair of pliers so I have to wait around to go fly.  I
guess it's just as well, I'd hate to find them at 3,000'.

Sorry to hear about the turbo Miata.  What happened to it?  Can't it be
fixed or are you just abandoning it?  Where are you leaning in terms of
a
new car?  On my end, the classic motorcycle is buzzing like  a champ and
a
complete blast to drive.

What's with the faggot Astro's walking your boy?  At least he pocketed
one
record.

I don't have TJ's email w/ me, but I'm sure he never expected you to
actually show up in the first place.

Capt. Frank P. Conway
"Sissy"
USNTPS Class 121
301.757.5079
conwayfp@navair.navy.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Conway, Frank P
Subject: RE:

Conway,

Do you have T.J.'s new email address.  I want to let him know I
won't be out there in Oct.  Give me a shout.  How's everything going?

My miata broke down this past weekend.  I didn't think it would be
that soon.  It looks like I'm forced to buy a new car.  I'm not
looking forward to the process although the internet should make
it less painful than it was 9.5 years ago.  Wow, I can't believe
I've owned the Miata for over 9 yrs.

I'm going to see Bonds play on Wednesday night.  Hoping he'll be
going for the record that night (either a tie or to break it).  I
scored tix in section 154 - prime bonds territory.  Check out the
section on the Houston Astros website.

Talk to you soon.

KR

-----Original Message-----
From: Conway, Frank P [mailto:ConwayFP@navair.navy.mil]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Ruscitti, Kevin
Subject: RE:

Yeah, I'll probably still go but I was planning on the first weekend
being
w/ the fellas.

Capt. Frank P. Conway
"Sissy"
USNTPS Class 121
301.757.5079
conwayfp@navair.navy.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Conway, Frank P
Subject: RE:

if i cancel, you're still going out to meet up w/ Denise, right?

-----Original Message-----
From: Conway, Frank P [mailto:ConwayFP@navair.navy.mil]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Ruscitti, Kevin
Subject:

Fag boy,

Let me know if you are definitely canceling for Cali so I can set up
other
plans.

Capt. Frank P. Conway
"Sissy"
USNTPS Class 121
301.757.5079
conwayfp@navair.navy.mil

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	Constellation EOL Amendment


you obviously haven't seen my new swing.  you need to be on your best game to
take my title.


John,

I am forwarding you a resume I have received today.
The document has been  distorted in transmission
but it's still readable.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
05:47 PM ---------------------------

dclarke4 <dclarke4@home.com> on 01/04/2001 10:59:28 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Energy/Power Trader

Vince:

Please find enclosed a copy of my resume. I am seeking a position
in Trading Energy/Power. Thank you in advance for your consideration.
If you require any other information, please contact me.

Regards,

Dwayne Clarke
 - dcresume2a.doc


Thanks for the note.  While most of my focus will be on ENA, it will be
interesting to look at operations around the world.


E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of
the original message. Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

Attached for your comments is a revised complaint in inverse condemnation,
with the PX and Reliant as plaintiffs.? I am sending it separately to Susan
Rossi, in-house counsel for the PX.? Since our last conference call we've
discussed the various forums and pending actions with FERC counsel for
Reliant and Enron. My understanding is that the PX wants us to act and will
cooperate with us.?

Marc, I haven't circulated this to the whole group because I wanted to go
through you.? What is the appropriate next step?? A call with the
decisionmakers on this issue so that we can make a plan to move forward?? Can
we do that Monday or Tuesday?

I've set out Reliant's conclusions here.?

1. There is no forum other than California state court in which we can get
compensation for the commandeered contracts because of the Eleventh Amendment
issue.

2. Filing the inverse condemnation action is not inconsistent with the FERC
proceeding in Tucson Electric.

3. Filing the inverse condemnation action is not inconsistent with Duke v.
Davis or with any other proceeding anyone may want to bring alleging that the
commandeering itself was illegal (e.g. on preemption grounds).

4.? As we discussed, nobody (including PG&E and SCE) wants the Board of
Control to be deciding anything if we can avoid it.? We would suggest going
along with the PX's suggestion that the bankruptcy court should be staying
the Board of Control action because of the interventions of SCE and PG&E, who
are taking the position that the compensation should go to them.? Then, we
can go forward with the inverse condemnation action in state court (we picked
LA as the forum because LA residents are less affected by the energy crisis
than most others in the state, and because it's convenient). If PG&E and SCE
are permitted to intervene in the state court action, we can stipulate to
relief from stay so that it can go forward.? This way, the Board of Control
is effectively stayed while the state court action goes forward.

5.? Richard Sanders expressed the very real concern that we don't want SCE
and PG&E's defenses to liquidation of the block forward contracts to be
decided anywhere but FERC.? We think we should be able to avoid that: since
SCE and PG&E have already put the issue squarely before FERC, that defense
could be stayed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine pending FERC's
decision.? We would argue that the whole case need not be stayed in the
meantime, since the governor's duty to compensate holds no matter who is owed
the compensation, and any proceeds from PX contracts will be funneled into
the Moreno escrow account.

6.? As we also discussed, we can file this complaint in the name of the PX,
Reliant, and any other market participants who want to be plaintiffs (we just
need names and a few facts to allege for each plaintiff). Or, as someone
suggested, if the PX Market Participants Committee is an entity that has
standing, it could be filed in that name along with the PX.? Either way, the
prayer for relief asks that all funds be deposited in the Moreno escrow
account for disposition consistent with FERC's decision in Coral Power.

?
 - 21315587_2.DOC