I would really like to go, just let me know when and where.  I went to a
Cuban resturant called Bossa tonight for Rhett's dad's birthday--it was very
nice(kinda like Churasco's or America's).  It is downtown near Cabo.  Just
an idea.
elaina

>From: "Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>
>To: ljahnke@aerotek.com, susan_s_edwards@yahoo.com,
>ashley.a.mace@williams.com, katyhester@hotmail.com, Kelbarker@aol.com,
>Corinne_Connally@Dell.com, LWhite@StageStores.com, lisa.gillette@enron.com,
>lodgesarah@hotmail.com, elaina5@hotmail.com, sonderfan@hotmail.com,
>kaseywalker@mindspring.com, sscott5@enron.com
>Subject: Re: Annual Christmas Dinner
>Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:52:57 -0000
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Received: from 195.50.73.67 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 09
Dec 2000 14:52:57 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [195.50.73.67]
From: "Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>
To: ljahnke@aerotek.com, susan_s_edwards@yahoo.com,
ashley.a.mace@williams.com, katyhester@hotmail.com, Kelbarker@aol.com,
Corinne_Connally@Dell.com, LWhite@StageStores.com, lisa.gillette@enron.com,
lodgesarah@hotmail.com, elaina5@hotmail.com, sonderfan@hotmail.com,
kaseywalker@mindspring.com, sscott5@enron.com
Subject: Re: Annual Christmas Dinner
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:52:57 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
X-Stn-Info:

my vote is for the 22nd- there is a good chance that if we were to plan this
business on the 19th, we would need to bring a cot for me, since approx
8:30pm will still be feeling like waaaaay past my bedtime- and NO ONE wants
me to be subdued, do they (ok, don't answer that.? who else will take it upon
themselves to be embarassingly drunk, perhaps vomiting on the curb.....except
laura- oh- wait- that's the trash can!?? just kidding laura- couldn't resist,
plus, it was nice to have a 'partner in crime'.....jen, kk, other spectacular
vomiters, you are included as well.? you non-hangover, happy-go-lucky at 8 am
people make me sick....literally.....)? god, am i rambling?? a little loopy-
too many papers, too little time. i was also going to throw out las alamedas
as a suggestion or ousies's table.? any thoughts?? i don't think ANY of us
have been there for grp things.....can't wait to see everyone!?
e
>From: Laura Jahnke
>Reply-To: ljahnke@aerotek.com
>To: Susan Edwards , Ash Mace , Katy Hester , Emily Hillegeist ,
"Kelbarker@aol.com" , "Corinne_Connally@Dell.com" , Laura White ,
lisa.gillette@enron.com, lodgesarah@hotmail.com, elaina5@hotmail.com,
sonderfan@hotmail.com, kaseywalker@mindspring, sscott5@enron.com
>Subject: Annual Christmas Dinner
>Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 13:45:25 -0500
>
>Hi Girls!
>It's that time again. We need to get everyone together for our annual
>Christmas Dinner. I have spoken to many of you and tried to come up
>with a good time for everyone. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be
>a "perfect day", but how about Friday-Dec. 22nd? Please respond and
>tell me what you think. I have had a few suggestions for a
>place-Churrasco's, America's, Ruggles, Benji's, Sullivans-please send a
>suggestion. Don't say it doesn't matter because majority vote will win
>and there will be no recount. The time will probably be around 8 p.m.
>I know the 22nd is close to Christmas, so the 19th has also been
>suggested-but I am afraid not everyone will be in town yet. Please send
>me your thoughts on the day, restauraunt, and if we should plan
>something after dinner. I can't wait to see everyone and hope all can
>make it!
>-Laura
>


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030601.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:   1.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/6/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   1.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/6/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DUCKS
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Peter,

Go ahead and complete the draft with what you have, and transmit it to me
with a list of questions which need to be answered to finish it.

Thanks,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/21/2000 02:00:57 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: City of Austin Facility Agreement

I have not yet received any response from Eric Boyt.  If possible, I
would like to receive that information today or early tomorrow so that I
can complete the agreement and leave the office by close of business
Wednesday.


thanx for all your help.  I will check it out.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3880D
(713) 345-4693

	Tana Jones@ECT
	02/27/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lotus Notes Access

You should have edit access now.  Why don't you go try and see if it works...


August CSU transfer from LT-SW to ST-WROCK 7/26.

I zeroed out Aug '01 strip in LTSW # 573463 and added Aug '01 strips in STWR # 576470

Annuity LTSW to STWR for the position transferred:
Deal # 705581
Amount: $1,082,503


Thank you for ordering from Amazon.com!

Your order information appears below.  If you need to get in
touch with us about your order, send an e-mail message to
orders@amazon.com (or just reply to this message).

             -- Amazon.com Customer Service

------------------------------------------------------------
Your order reads as follows:

E-mail address: jdasovic@enron.com

Ship to:  Jeffrey Dasovich
   101 California Street,Suite 1950
   San Francisco
   California
   94111

Tel:    415-782-7822

------------------------------------------------------------
1 "The Long Boom"
 Peter Schwartz, et al; Hardcover; @ $15.60 each
     (Usually ships in 24 hours)

Will ship via: Standard Shipping (3-7 business days)

Item(s) Subtotal:                      $15.60
Shipping & Handling:                     3.95
                                      -------
Subtotal:                              $19.55
Tax:                                     0.00
                                      -------
TOTAL DUE:                             $19.55

As an Amazon.com customer, you'll occasionally receive
e-mail updates about important functionality changes to the
Web site, new Amazon.com services, and special offers we
believe would be beneficial to you. We hope you'll find
these updates interesting and informative. But if you'd
rather not receive them, please visit your Amazon.com
Subscriptions page:

   http://www.amazon.com/subscriptions

Please note that you can view the status of your account,
examine your orders, cancel unshipped orders, change your
e-mail address or password, or update your subscriptions to
our Personal Notification Services at any time through the
"Your Account" link on the navigation bar.

   http://www.amazon.com/your-account

Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com!

-------------------------------------------------------------

Amazon.com
More than 4.7 million titles
Earth's Biggest Selection
http://www.amazon.com
orders@amazon.com
-------------------------------------------------------------


Julie is checking with Kern and the modification to their assignment
agreement and whether they will prepare the assignments.  If I am to prepare
the assignments I will need the Transportation Service Agreement information
(volume, contract #, contract date)  for each shipper.

	Barry Tycholiz@ENRON
	04/09/2001 03:49 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirms for Nevada Power

gerald, pls change the contract price to monthy index minus $ .42 US/mmbtu on
both agreements and resend.


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 10:50 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate,
Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: PG&E Energy Trading

Phillip, Scott, Hunter, Tom and John -

Just to reiterate the new trading guidelines on PG&E Energy Trading:

1.  Both financial and physical trading are approved, with a maximum tenor of
18 months

2.  Approved entities are: PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation
    PG&E Energy Trading - Canada Corporation

    NO OTHER PG&E ENTITIES ARE APPROVED FOR TRADING

3.  Both EOL and OTC transactions are OK

4.  Please call Credit (ext. 31803) with details on every OTC transaction.
We need to track all new positions with PG&E Energy Trading on an ongoing
basis.  Please ask the traders and originators on your desks to notify us
with the details on any new transactions immediately upon execution.  For
large transactions (greater than 2 contracts/day or 5 BCF total), please call
for approval before transacting.

Thanks for your assistance; please call me (ext. 53923) or Russell Diamond
(ext. 57095) if you have any questions.

Jay


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
12:24 PM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
01/25/2001 12:09 PM
To: Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: You WILL be interested in these sites

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 12:09 PM
---------------------------

"Bruce A. Bernard" <bbernard@hypercon.com> on 01/25/2001 11:08:25 AM
To: Greg.Couch@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: You WILL be interested in these sites

Cool sites!

Also, unrelated, but interesting as well!

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21384

-BAB

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg.Couch@enron.com [mailto:Greg.Couch@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:09 PM
To: bbernard@hypercon.com
Subject: You WILL be interested in these sites

www.solow.com   (just wish I had time to get one in before our hunt)
www.rimfirecentral.com    (there is also a link from the main page to a
Mark II discussion forum)


Alan - thanks for assembling this information.  It is very useful but I want
to throw out some ideas for discussion and ask you and others to comment on
the direction we take with this.

I think we should characterize the Cost of Takeover as the difference in cost
between the Nationalization approach Davis is taking and Enron's Market
approach (increase supply, decrease demand, retail competition, utility
solvency).   Here's the direction that takes us:

$13 B utility under-recovery:  required in both cases.
$7.6 purchase of Transmission:  represents a $3.8B excess cost in Davis
plan.  Ratepayers were going to pay for the first $3.8B anyway.  If Davis
nets this against the $13 B under-recovery, then it's not an excess cost.
Transmission upgrades:  required in both cases.
DSM/DG grants:  required in both cases.
New construction to cover short position:  required in both cases.  Cost
difference is net difference between private market cost of generation and
what subsidy CA must provide to induce generation at its desired cost, and
net inefficiency from administering a govt. bureaucracy vs. free market entry
and exit.  These will be a function of how 6X is administered.

In other words, I see the direct and measurable Cost of Takeover now as maybe
$4-5 B, including $1B to cover court challenges, legal costs, new bureaucracy
and so on.  Much more important (and perhaps this is where the big $$ can
come in) is through indirect costs - damage to California's economy through
reduced private investment because of heavy-handed govt threat, loss of
commercial and industrial development because of short-term supply shortages,
and long term inefficiencies because of public instead of private management.

So how about this:  direct cost of takeover is $5 billion plus a long term,
indirect cost of $__ B because of a 5% reduction per year in the rate of new
capital investment  in the state.  Maybe a Robert Michael or somebody could
fill in the last blank with a little prodding from us.

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	02/21/2001 01:49 PM

		 To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Cost of Takeover

I already have a few changes:

In Davis's Feb 08 press release, it states: "Under Governor Davis' emergency
powers and proposals, California will streamline efforts to bring an
additional 20,000 megawatts online by July 2004, starting with 5,000
additional megawatts by July 2001 and 5,000 more megawatts by July 2002."

Also, he mentions expanding by 1,000 MW the transmission line "to Oregon" in
his 2/16 press conference transcript.

I have just upped the costs to reflect these numbers.


Thanks again for all your help


Fyi, do you know this guy?
m

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Funkhouser, Shanna
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Mcconnell, Mike
Subject:	FW:

fyi,
Shanna
-----Original Message-----
From:	Oxley, David
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Funkhouser, Shanna; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Subject:	FW:

-----Original Message-----
From:	Porter, Stuart [mailto:porters@hmc.harvard.edu]
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:11 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:

David,
I run a $650 million dollar commodities fund at Harvard Management Company.  Our focus has been on arbitrage strategies in the commodity arena - we are looking to expand into weather and power. I was wondering, if given the potential situation at Enron, that there might be employees interested in interviewing for several positions both within my group and foreign equities ? I apologize if this is too forward or that I have assumed too much in terms of potential restructurings.
Thanks,

Stuart D. Porter


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041620.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 20 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Attached are the draft ConfirmLogic documents for Entergy Koch for your review.  Prior to this going to a wider circulation within Enron for comment I would appreciate any comments or suggestions on the structure and format.  There are many definitions in these documents that will need careful review to ensure that the end result is consistent with our practice.  Exhibit A needs to be modified so that the Index name is consistent with what will be input into ConfirmLogic.  There are also some missing variables in certain of the indexes that will need clarification.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Regards,
Brent


Michael:
If you can let me know when you have talked with Dave, that would be great.
I am trying to talk with Don Miller and wanted to make sure that you had
already talked with Dave.  Enron's PRC is going on and I am trying to get
promoted to manager and this deal should enable me to do just that.  Thanks
again for your comments to Dave.
Ben


I heard about this.  Griswold was a weener.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Diane - PSP [mailto:dcherry@bpa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:56 AM
To: 'Sean Crandall'
Subject:

Don't know if you saw this:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced August 21 that it
filed and simultaneously settled administrative proceedings against Avista
Energy, of Spokane, Washington, former Avista Energy Vice President of
Trading Thomas Johns of Spokane, Washington, and former Avista Energy trader
Michael T. Griswold of Seattle, Washington. In the Order issued today, the
CFTC finds that on four days between April 1998 and August 1998, Avista
Energy manipulated the settlement prices of the Palo Verde and
California-Oregon-Border electricity futures contracts traded on the New
York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), in order to increase the company's net
gain on certain over-the-counter option positions, whose value was based on
the settlement prices at issue.

The CFTC imposed cease and desist orders against Avista Energy, Griswold,
and Johns, and required them to pay civil monetary penalties of $2.1
million, $110,000, and $50,000, respectively. The CFTC also imposed an
18-month trading ban on Griswold and a 12-month trading ban on Johns. The
settlements require Avista Energy, Griswold, and Johns to cooperate in any
further investigations and proceedings related to the conduct at issue.
Avista Energy, Griswold, and Johns consented to the entry of the orders
without admitting or denying the findings made in the orders.

The CFTC also filed a ten-count complaint against former Avista Energy Vice
President of Trading Strategies William H. Taylor of Houston, Texas, former
Avista Energy trader Robert S. Kristufek of Chicago, Illinois, and NYMEX
floor broker Anthony J. DiPlacido of Bellmore, New York, charging them with
participating in the manipulative scheme.

Copies of the CFTC complaint and orders may be found at http://www.cftc.gov/
<http://www.cftc.gov/cftc/cftchome.htm>

Diane Cherry
503.230.5648


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org> on 01/08/2001 05:22:41 AM
Please respond to Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org>
To: Edward Allen <eallen@eagleglobal.com>, Bernard Arocha <barocha@msn.com>,
Ellie Beard <ecabeard@aol.com>, Toni Beauchamp <TONIBEAUCHAMP@YAHOO.COM>,
Fran Berg <fberg@swbell.net>, Deborah Brochstein <deborah@brochsteins.com>,
Brad Bucher <brad@gcchem.com>, Jeff Daly <jeffrey.daly@gs.com>, Chadwick Dodd
<cdodd@Jwortham.com>, Sara Dodd <sfpdodd@aol.com>, Stephen Finley
<steve.finley@bakerhughes.com>, Heidi Gerger <HMG60@aol.com>, William
Goldberg <wgoldberg@kpmg.com>, John Guess <jfguess@usa.net>, Dana Harper
<danarharper@aol.com>, Rachel Hecker <ritexdog@aol.com>, Bruce Herzog
<bherzog@genesis-park.com>, Louise Jamail <RobotRob@aol.com>, Jill Jewett
<TheJewetts@msn.com>, Leonard Jones <ljones@rfp-co.com>, "I.H. Kempner III"
<ihkempner@imperialsugar.com>, Carmen Knapp <sailby2@aol.com>, Elwyn Lee
<ECLee@uh.edu>, Marley Lott <marley_lott@bakerbotts.com>, Ginni Mithoff
<gmithoff@infohwy.com>, Angela Myres <asmyres@msn.com>, Evi Newar
<EviNew@aol.com>, Roy Nolen <roy.nolen@bakerbotts.com>, Robert Palmquist
<robert.p.palmquist@us.arthurandersen.com>, Annise Parker
<aparker@cnl.ci.houston.tx.us>, Jeff Shankman <jshankm@enron.com>, Charles
Smith <RSMCES@aol.com>, Reginald Smith <rsmith@kslaw.com>, Stephen Susman
<ssusman@susmangodfrey.com>, Laura Walls <lmorwalls@aol.com>, Kenneth
Williams <kmwilliams@frostbank.com>, Michael Zilkha <michael@zilkha.com>
cc:
Subject:

Dear Member of CAM Board of Trustees,

You may recall that several weeks ago we surveyed the Board members to
determine preferences regarding Board meeting times. We did this because we
have had several discussions with members who have great difficulty with the
4 pm or 4:30 pm meeting time.

Since the Board appears to be fairly evenly split between a noon meeting time
and a late afternoon meeting time (10 definitely prefer Noon; 10 definitely
prefer late afternoon; and 20 have no strong preference), we have decided to
try alternating the meetings.

Therefore, our next full board meeting, which is currently scheduled for
Monday, January 22 at 4 pm, will instead take place Monday, January 22 at
NOON (March meeting will take place at 4 pm).

Please note this change on your calendar and advise Cheryl Blissitte by
email, phone (713.284.8253) or fax (713.284.8275), whether or not you will be
attending. This is especially important as we will order sandwiches for this
Noon meeting.

Thanks.

Marti


New Product Type (US ResiOil Swap)

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Gas Fin Spread.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the
new product type from the following:

US Gas Fin Swap

Please respond by 3p.m. on Tuesday, February 27.

Thank you.
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
05:41 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           02/21/2001 03:46 PM

To: Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Need a Sigma Factor - US Gas Financial Spread

Please provide a Sigma Factor for the following product.

Thanks.

US Gas Fin Spread Nymex Spread Mar-Apr01 USD/MM

A financial Spread Transaction with Enron North America Corp. which will
generate a Transaction on each of two Products, under which either (A) for
the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to buy from Enron,
Counterparty shall buy the First Product and sell the Second Product, each in
respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period; or (B) for the
case in which Counterparty submits an offer to sell to Enron, Counterparty
shall sell the First Product and buy the Second Product, each in respect of
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period. The fixed price for the First
Product will be the midpoint of its bid and offer price at the time of the
Transaction. The fixed price for the Second Product will be the midpoint of
the bid/offer of the First Product, modified by the price submitted by the
Counterparty on the Website. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period
for the Transactions on both the First Product and the Second Product is the
volume submitted by the Counterparty via the Website. The Payment Date for
each transaction will be 5 business days after the relevant Floating Price is
determinable.  The Floating Price for each Transaction shall be the average
of the Index for each day in the relevant Determination Period.
For the purposes of this Transaction, the Determination Period for the First
Product shall correspond to the first date which appears above. The
Determination Period for the Second Product shall correspond to the second
date which appears above.
The Index for each transaction shall be the settlement price for the last
scheduled Trading Day of the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract for
the applicable Determination Period.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 10,000 MMBtu's
per day.


Thanks.  Pls send out.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pharms, Melinda
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 2:12 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Open Access in California

Hey there Jim.  I'm glad you made it back in one piece.  I'm sure your wife was frantic.

FYI:  This past week-end, Becky and I attended NESA's annual conference.  One of the highlights was a panel entitled "Power Deregulation."  On the panel:  Brad Williams, Sr. VP, Entergy Wholesale Operations;  Michael Schneider, Director, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E); Steve Gillialand, Sr. VP, Duke Energy North America, LLC; and Jerry Winter, VP, Reliant Energy Services.  Note: Loretta Lynch, President, CPUC was scheduled to participate on the panel as well, but she was a no-show.  My guess - she chickened out.  It was probably for the best because everyone on the panel "slammed" California, the Governor, and the CPUC.

I had the opportunity of questioning Michael Schneider (I asked these via note cards) of SDG&E in regards to Open Access and where did it look like the legislature was going with it and what was SDG&E's position.  On record, he said that open access will pass through legislature but that it would be "segmented."  For example, depending on the size of the customer would depend on if they can participate in regards to open access.  The Large customers can have the opportunity to participate in open access but supposedly because the smaller customers "aren't really educated" on the issues of open access, they won't be able to participate.  (Sounded rather patronizing to me, even if he was rather pleasant.)  How does SDG&E feel about open access?  He said that they're definitely in favor of  open access and feel that it is needed but only for large customers and that the smaller customers aren't "quite ready" for open access because again lack of education.  Supposedly the smaller customers aren't sophisticated enough I guess.

Jim, question - is this something everyone on the Ca. calls already know including you or should I send this out to others as a "FYI" ?

Melinda


Maybe you can bring your stuff next time. See you later sweetheart.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	RE:

How is that ?  I don't have my work out clothes with me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE:

You can!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	RE:

Have a great work out.  I wish I could go with you.

Love you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:

I'm going to work out at lunch time. I love you babe.


Brian, good memo - I think you mean't Energy Capital Resources not Enron
Capital Resources in your memo.  I would distribute widely in the management
ranks.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
10:20 AM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond
01/12/2001 10:14 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tech Services

Dave:

I would like to send the attached memo to the heads of the orig groups
describing the working relationship with Tech Services.  I would also like to
follow this up with quarterly meetings with each of the groups to review
resources, deal status, technical risk mitigation.  The meetings are not
intended to be a technical audit, but to provide a vehicle to coordinate
priorities and spot potential issues before they become problems.

Comments?

Brian


Thanks for updating  me on things.  We could get together for lunch some time
if you want.  I am downtown and generally keep Thursday's open to lunch with
friends.  I am at 713-853-6544 and you can always leave a message on vm.
Take care.  Mark


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001 05:26
PM ---------------------------

Marybeth Schubert <schub@socrates.berkeley.edu> on 05/08/2001 06:25:37 PM
To: joseph.alamo@enron.com
cc:

Subject: conference call with Steve Cain and Jeff Dasovitch

Joseph:

Laura Tyson and I will be available for a conference call with Steve
Cain and Jeff Dasovitch tomorrow afternoon at 1:30 pacific.  Dean
Tyson will be at the Westin William Penn Hotel: 412-281-7100.  I will
be at 505-820-6721.  I'd appreciate it if you would coordinate
details with Jeff.  Marybeth


(See attached file: HPLN1111.xls)

 - HPLN1111.xls


Loop Agreement associated with PA and Amendment

chris
x31666

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 11:45
AM ---------------------------

"Warhover, Judy" <Judy.Warhover@coastalcorp.com> on 07/11/2000 09:37:04 AM
To: "'mlegler@enron.com'" <mlegler@enron.com>, "'chris.meyer@enron.com'"
<chris.meyer@enron.com>
cc: "Lobban, Laine" <Laine.Lobban@coastalcorp.com>
Subject: WIC Firm Agreement 41087000

For your review:

 <<41087.doc>>

 - 41087.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Gorny, Vladimir
Subject:	FW: Var Limits

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zufferli, John
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:52 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	Var Limits

Sorry for the delay, I had to do it twice since excell blew up on me and I didn't save it.

I hope that this is comprehensive enough.


I know Beth Perlman is a VP of Enron Corp. ) that,s why I suggested she sign
the MOU instead of Philippe in my email to you yesterday.  I don,t understand
your emphasis on the word &is8.

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Ward, Bob
Cc: Greenberg, Mark
Subject: Re: FW: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Beth Perlman, who IS a VP of Enron Corp.

	Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 01:52 PM
		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Ogg/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Mark,

Please send a signed copy of the MOU to James Morris at the address below.
By the way, who signed the it?  Thank you.

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

-----Original Message-----
From:  James Morris [mailto:jammo@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Ward, Bob
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: RE: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

Hey guys...
Send it to
1 Microsoft Way
Bldg 1 rm 2006
Redmond, WA 98052

Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Bob [mailto:Bob.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:29 AM
To: James Morris
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: SP1 JDP MOU Signed

James,

We have a signed copy of the MOU ready to send to you.  I need your address.
Thank you.
Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409


Bruce - I just had another thought (they come so rarely I feel a need to pass
them along as soon as it happens).  The Full Moon party we discussed before
is on Nov. 23.  Unfortunately it is in the BVI.  If your lawyer can get the
permit by Monday and Fed Ex it to us, we could still get over there (Bomba's
Shack is on the western end of Tortola - reasonably close to the USVI).  The
boat will have a cell phone but we won't have a number till Sunday at the
earliest.  Be sure to bring the lawyer's number so we can call him Monday.

Mark

P.S.  -  My sympathies on your day at Federal Plaza.  My imagination isn't up
to the task of conjuring how miserable that must have been.


pmorrison@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants,

Please note the NYISO online systems will become unavailable tonight
between 7:00 pm (19:00) and 7:15 pm (19:15) for a hardware/software
upgrade to the Internet security systems.

A fallback plan is in place in the event any problems are encountered
so your access to services will resume on schedule.

Regards,
Customer Relations
518-356-6060


use the following link for enrononline: www.enrononline.com


I'll call you as soon as I finish talking to Dick
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/06/99
09:05 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Richard Ingersoll                           10/06/99 12:13 AM

To: James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: TVA/Enron Control Area Scheduling Agreement

Note they backed off on not lettting us be a sink but again changed the
language relating to the 20 min.  They assure us verbally that they intend to
honor the twenty minutes whenever possible.  This could possibly be addressed
in a cover letter so that if it is abused we can open up the agreement
again.  A copy of the cover letter would goto NERC and SERC.  They also
refuse to let us aggreate schedules.  The IDC language was taken out but
replaced with language eliminating any impact on commercial arrangement.
Again, even though a cover letter may not be an official part of an agreement
I believe, if we reach any agreement we should explain our expectations where
they are not clearly defined in the agreement in a cover letter to SERC and
NERC.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT on 10/06/99
12:00 AM ---------------------------

"Whitley, Stephen G." <sgwhitley@tva.gov> on 10/05/99 04:46:11 PM
To: "Satterfield, Gail B." <gbsatterfield@tva.gov>, "'jmaughn@serc1.org'"
<jmaughn@serc1.org>, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Boston, W. Terry" <wtboston@tva.gov>, "McCay, John A."
<jamccay@tva.gov>, "Katine, Sanford D." <sdkatine@tva.gov>, "Whiting, G. Luke
Jr." <glwhitin@tva.gov>, "Lundin, Bill W." <lwlundin@tva.gov>, "Lawson,
Patricia S." <pslawson@tva.gov>
Subject: TVA/Enron Control Area Scheduling Agreement

Dick/Jim
Here is an agreement that we can accept if SERC and Enron approves.  It is
my belief that it is consistent with the agreement reached in SERC/Atlanta
last week.  We have tried to accomodate Enron's concerns related to
"non-binding" and "for IDC purposes only" in the lead-in paragraph.  We do
not think it is appropriate to address Gleason at this time -- we should get
some operating experience with the present sites and see where the CATF is
going.  Gleason will not be operational until next year.
Thanks

 <<03670328>>
Gail -- please the FAX agreement and e-mail to Terry at his hotel

 - 03670328.doc


<<CinergyHourlyTableNov27.xls>>

Lisa Lawson
Markets Editor
Platts - Megawatt Daily
713 939-5802
lisa_lawson@platts.com

 - CinergyHourlyTableNov27.xls


Elizabeth,

Hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving-weekend.  Just wanted to follow-up on my messages on your voice mail re. our call with VEPCO and subsequently, with Kevin.  It seems that there might be some agreement with VEPCO with regards to moving to an hourly index.  Kevin said he needed to hear from you and the higher-ups that our potential exposure resulting from audits was something we needed to address, and he would then take the resulting positions on his books (without being penalized over potential MTM downside).

Please give me a call when you have a moment so I can fill you in, and we can discuss the feedback we need to provide internally and to VEPCO (they're expecting something by tomorrow - Tuesday, 11/27/01)

Please feel free to call me at any time.

Regards,
Rahil
W: 713.853.3206
C:  281.704.1060


Rosie - please print and have signed.  (Note there is a typo in the second
line of the last paragraph -- does should be "do").  thanks
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 04:41 PM -----

	Keith Stepp@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	09/26/2000 03:54 AM

		 To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Soon Yeap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kari
Duncan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Letter for Lay Signature

John/Steve,

Attached is a draft letter to Party Secretary Zhou Yong Kang of Sichuan
Province declining an invitation for Ken Lay to speak at the 2000  Western
Forum of China.  Secretary Zhou was recently in Houston and has extended an
invitation to Ken Lay to speak at this conference.

Please make any changes you feel are necessary, have Ken Lay's office print
for his signature and send to Kari Duncan for faxing and forwarding.  If you
have any questions, let us know.

Thanks.  --Keith


I got your voice mail from Friday!

Since I am in Denver at 8:30, we can definitely head up to Winter Park immediately.  If there is a group snowmobiling that afternoon (and if you want), let's join them.

Michelle Lokay
Account Director
Transwestern Commercial Group
713-345-7932


I came, I saw, I viewed.....and now I will eat. Thanks for the update, Grace!

Kate

GRACE RODRIGUEZ
02/22/2001 05:18 PM
To: Portland West Desk, assetsvc/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: One tomato, two tomato, three tomato, four!

Las Vegas Delight Hydroponic tomatoes are available for your eating (or
viewing?) pleasure -- right by Teri's old desk!

Come and get 'em!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2000
02:47 PM ---------------------------

bradley romine <bradley@Stanford.EDU> on 01/20/2000 02:16:24 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting (fwd)

--
Bradley Romine
EES/OR Stanford University
bradley@leland.stanford.edu

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:09:05 -0800 (PST)
From: bradley romine <bradley@Stanford.EDU>
To: Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Meeting

Professor Bambos,
 3pm on Wed. is fine with them. So I'll see you then in your office
in terman.

Brad

On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Nick Bambos wrote:

> Brad,
>
> Yes, I would be happy to meet with them.
> How about 3pm on Wed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> bradley romine wrote:
> >
> > Hello Professor Bambos,
> >         I was talking to some friends I have at Enron about pricing
> > options for bandwidth trading and other optimization algorithms for
> > broadband networks. Anyway they are interested in talking to you about
> > your research. They will be in town next week tuesday and wednesday and
> > would appreciate getting a chance to talk to you. Are you available?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >         Brad
> >
> >  --
> > Bradley Romine
> > EES/OR Stanford University
> > bradley@leland.stanford.edu
>

--
Bradley Romine
EES/OR Stanford University
bradley@leland.stanford.edu


Could you and Veronica do lunch one day next week?  Is Wednesday Ok?


Miyako sounds great.  Why don't we meet there at 12:00.

I didn't get to know Terry that well.  I was pretty green at that point.
That was actually the first deal I worked on when I got to legal.  I went to
law school a little later in life.  I have been practicing for about 2
years.  Terry reminded me of an absent minded professor.  He had this pair of
glasses that during the course of the deal, they became more and more broken
down.  By the end, one of the ear pieces was missing and they barely stayed
on his face.  At the closing dinner Enron bought him a new pair of glasses.

South America.  That sounds pretty interesting, ever travel down there?

	"Beckworth, Melissa" <mbeckworth@velaw.com>
	11/09/2000 11:59 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Hello!

hi gn. so funny...terry and david are in my group. i don't know david as
well really, but terry is a good friend and is a total riot! i don't know
how well you got to know him, but he really is just great. anyway, i have
really been working with enron south america on the cuiaba project
exclusively for the past year and a half. the enron attorneys are randy
young and john novak. prior to that i did a few structured deals --
christina mordaunt was the atty.

yes, annie wu (we just call her "the wu") is a stitch! remind me to tell you
the story about when she came to visit me in london...and a few other
stories. she is a trip! truly a sweet person and a good friend too. i heard
you know my friend walter daniel, too. he was in my law school class and is
also a good friend.

whenever/wherever on the 14th is fine. do you like sushi? we could go to
miyako...or zydeco or becks? those are the places where i usually meet enron
folks since they are in between... let me know! mb

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:29 AM
To: mbeckworth@velaw.com
Subject: Hello!

Hi Melissa,

Thanks for the call.  I thought it might be easier to communicate via email
since we are both kind of difficult to reach via phone.  Sounds like they
keep you busy at V&E.

Yes, I do work for Enron.  I am an attorney for Enron North America in gas
and power origination.   I actually worked with some attorney's from V&E on
a couple of asset financing deals we did about a year ago.  Terry Yates and
David Keyes.  Joel Ephross also worked on those deals, but he is now at
Enron in our Global Finance Legal Group.

Sounds like you have worked alot on Enron deals.  I know we keep you guys
pretty loaded with work.  Who are your Enron contacts?  Enron is a big
place, but I might know them.

Lunch sounds great.  The 14th works for me.  Any preferences as to
location?

In case you were wondering about how Ann Wukasch and I know each other; Ann
and I met at my sister's wedding in Colorado.  My sister and Ann are good
friends and work at the same school in Dallas.   Ann is a trip!

Gerald
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Received: from houhq_svrapp1.oaksgroup.com ([209.220.178.10]) by HW_3; Fri,
10 Dec 1999 09:10:12 -0600
Received: by HOUHQ_SVRAPP1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id
<XNAYN4BM>; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:06:05 -0600
Message-ID: <4D91BD0D6220D311905A0008C75B72054C7793@HOUHQ_SVRAPP1>
From: Jennifer Bell <jennifer.bell@oaksgroup.com>
To: "'Ward_H@houworks.com'" <Ward_H@houworks.com>
Subject: FW: HAVE FUN
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:06:01 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BF4320.1484398C"

 <<JACKS2.EXE>>  <<BLOCKS3.EXE>>  <<CHECKERS.EXE>>  <<CODEBRAK.EXE>>
<<DOMINOES.EXE>>  <<DOTS.EXE>>  <<FLAGHUNT.EXE>>  <<HANGMAN3.EXE>>
<<HYPEROID.EXE>>  <<AFORCE.EXE>>  <<MARIO.EXE>>  <<PACPC.EXE>>  <<POOL.EXE>>
 <<SLOT.EXE>>  <<SPADES.EXE>>  <<SQUASH.EXE>>  <<STICKS.EXE>>  <<SOL.EXE>>
<<Killbees.exe>>

-----Original Message-----
From: Cynthia Lockett [mailto:cmlockett@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 8:28 AM
To: lOCKETTMD@MFR.USMC.MIL
Subject: Fw: GAMES

-----Original Message-----
From: Lockett.Cynthia <Lockett.Cynthia@DIMAC.COM>
To: 'CYNTHIA LOCKETT' <CMLOCKETT@earthlink.net>
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 12:07 PM
Subject: FW: HEY LADY I hope you like this.

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sykes.Teressa
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 2:01 PM
>> To: Lockett.Cynthia
>> Subject: FW: HEY LADY I hope you like this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Teressa
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: smyers@intercardinc.com [SMTP:smyers@intercardinc.com]
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 10:30 AM
>> To: avincent@intercardinc.com; dlayton@intercardinc.com;
>> kmichael@intercardinc.com; pnix@intercardinc.com;
>> dreidel@intercardinc.com; shauna.lewis@mkg.com; sykes.teressa@dimac.com;
>> br8822@aol.com
>> Subject: HEY LADY I hope you like this.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------- Forwarded by Sheryl Myers/Intercard_Inc. on
>> 11/29/99
>> 10:28 AM ---------------------------
>>
>>
>> Vincent Redmond
>> 11/29/99 10:24 AM
>>
>> To: Sheryl Myers/Intercard_Inc.@Intercard_Inc.
>> cc:
>> Subject: HEY LADY I hope you like this.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------- Forwarded by Vincent Redmond/Intercard_Inc. on
>> 11/29/99 10:17 AM ---------------------------
>>
>>
>> "Taylor, Christopher E" <Christopher.E.Taylor@stls.frb.org> on 11/24/99
>> 04:56:05 PM
>>
>> To:
>> cc:    (bcc: Vincent Redmond/Intercard_Inc.)
>> Subject: FW: *****GAMES******Some thing to do when you guy are not
busy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  <<JACKS2.EXE>>  <<BLOCKS3.EXE>>  <<CHECKERS.EXE>>  <<CODEBRAK.EXE>>
>> <<DOMINOES.EXE>>  <<DOTS.EXE>>  <<FLAGHUNT.EXE>>  <<HANGMAN3.EXE>>
>> <<HYPEROID.EXE>>  <<AFORCE.EXE>>  <<MARIO.EXE>>  <<PACPC.EXE>>
>> <<POOL.EXE>>
>>  <<SLOT.EXE>>  <<SPADES.EXE>>  <<SQUASH.EXE>>  <<STICKS.EXE>>
<<SOL.EXE>>
>> <<Killbees.exe>>
>>
>>  <<JACKS2.EXE>>  <<BLOCKS3.EXE>>  <<CHECKERS.EXE>>  <<CODEBRAK.EXE>>
>> <<DOMINOES.EXE>>  <<DOTS.EXE>>  <<FLAGHUNT.EXE>>  <<HANGMAN3.EXE>>
>> <<HYPEROID.EXE>>  <<AFORCE.EXE>>  <<MARIO.EXE>>  <<PACPC.EXE>>
>> <<POOL.EXE>>  <<SLOT.EXE>>  <<SPADES.EXE>>  <<SQUASH.EXE>>
<<STICKS.EXE>>
>>  <<SOL.EXE>>  <<Killbees.exe>>
>

 - att1.htm
 - JACKS2.EXE
 - BLOCKS3.EXE
 - CHECKERS.EXE
 - CODEBRAK.EXE
 - DOMINOES.EXE
 - DOTS.EXE
 - FLAGHUNT.EXE
 - HANGMAN3.EXE
 - HYPEROID.EXE
 - AFORCE.EXE
 - MARIO.EXE
 - PACPC.EXE
 - POOL.EXE
 - SLOT.EXE
 - SPADES.EXE
 - SQUASH.EXE
 - STICKS.EXE
 - SOL.EXE
 - Killbees.exe


-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; '/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229'; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Please flip these if applicable.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
09:37 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
01/26/2001 09:11 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deals to be flipped to FT-US/CAND-ERMS book by Monday

Hi guys,
Here is a list of deals that I know of that need to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book right away.  Please go through your books to see if
there are any deals that I might have missed.

FT-CENT
QL0357.1

FT-East
QK7518.1
QL0420.1
QL0428.1

FT-Northwest
QK1495.1
QK1523.1

FT-NY
QN1718.1

FT-Ontario
QI9616.1 QJ2975.1 QM8037.1
QJ0701.1 QJ3180.1 QN1433.1
QJ0885.1 QJ7611.1 QN4064.1
QJ1074.1 QK1086.1
QJ2553.1 QK4194.1

FT-West
QK0633.1 QL7513.1
QK9592.1 QL7536.1
QL6923.1 QL7991.1
QL7500.1 QL8766.1

G-DAILY-EST

GD-New
QL7501.1
QM8047.1

I didnt' come across any deals with Duke Energy Marketing LP and ECC in your
books, so I think there may be some being booked still as ENA and DEMLP.
These all need to be flipped to settle in the FT-US/CAND-ERMS books like the
rest of these deals.  I've spoken to Jennifer Denny with EOL about getting a
program set up for Duke deals similar to ones we have with TransCanada Energy
and Dynegy Canada so they automatically get booked to settle with ECC, but I
don't think this has happened yet.  Please go through your books to make sure
that no Duke deals have been missed.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks for all your help
Stacey


Man, you're quick.  Thanks very much.  This is really starting to get wierd.
Makes Cuba look capitalist.

Best,
Jeff


Hey!  Yes, put in one more call.  Ann is a nut, but she sounds like
you really should call.  No plans for Estes for  a while.  We are
trying to save money and the plans for the house in Estes are still
in the works.  Hope all is well!
--
Sharon Snyder
ssnyder@shelton.org


I just spoke with Holli, and she reported that the confirmation has been
awaiting a signature at Grant County for the past week. She said she plans to
send it to Kim Theriot as soon as she gets it back. Let me know if that
sounds good; otherwise, I can ask her about sending you an unsigned copy.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/06/2001 11:19 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 420529.01

Did you receive the executed copy of this deal there in your office?  We do
not show that we have received an executed copy of this confirmation from the
counterparty.  If you do not have the executed copy of the deal, please send
me the copy you faxed to the counterparty and we will send it again and try
to get it executed.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 01:07
PM ---------------------------
   Kim S Theriot                02/06/2001 11:57 AM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal 420529.01

Sharen,
I saw that there was a note on this deal that Legal prepared the confirmation
and Holli Krebs sent it to the counterparty herself.  Can you obtain a copy
of what they sent for our files.  There is nothing in Livelink and if we
would ever need to reproduce the document we would have nothing.  Also, it
shows that it has not been singned unless Portland has a signed copy.

Kim


Rain
please help
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------

From:  Stephanie Sever
     07/17/2000 04:21 AM

To: Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Access

Joe,

Please submit an SRRS request through lotus notes for EOL - Backoffice
applications.  Once this is received and approved, I will be able to set you
up with necessary access.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000
10:18 AM ---------------------------

Hunter S Shively
07/14/2000 07:44 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Access

Joe Parks should be set-up for managing products

Hunter
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000
07:42 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Joe Parks                           07/13/2000 04:58 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Access

Stephanie Sever  is the contact in EOL Product Control. She needs your
approval to set me up to manage product on NGPL.


You know, generally, when I'm up in the morning, hanging around, getting
ready to start the day, I can't see any reason to put clothes on.  I am much
more comfortable that way.  Always been that way.

Good goal.  It would be easiest for me to have the meeting in SF.  Next
week's fine for me.  Monday's a day off for me.  You?  Or we could set
something up in the morning next week.  Just let me know.

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	01/11/2001 12:16 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: you and me

Sorry for surprising you this morning!!  Nothing wrong with being
comfortable in your birthday suit.

Speaking of birthdays, I think we should have a goal to get my company
acquired by your company by May 30, 2001.  Good goal, huh??

I want to talk to you about the details I have been thinking about while you
were gone.  When should we talk??  Let,s set up a meeting so we make sure to
move this all forward.

Welcome back.

-C

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


Jonathan,

Please resend the draft confidentiality agreement for the Public Staff,
preferably by email.  I cannot locate the document here.

The LOI with Rocky Mount is still under discussion.  In a recent discussion
with one of Enron's folks the City (or their lawyer) raised the issue that
Kilpatrick Stockton had represented them in the past, and that there might be
a potential conflict.  I don't anticipate a problem, but we should discuss it
soon.

Thank you for your assistance,

Kay

"Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com> on 07/18/2000 08:09:28 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com>, "'lisa.mellencamp@enron.com'"
<lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>, "'jeffrey.m.keenan@enron.com'"
<jeffrey.m.keenan@enron.com>

Subject: Richmond Project

Kay:

   Just a brief note to check on the status of the confidentiality
agreement with the Public Staff.  What did you think of the draft Allyson
and I forwarded by fax last week?  Once that is signed, we can go ahead and
submit Jeffrey Keenan's cost estimates.

   Also, curious as to the status of the LOI and confidentiality
agreement (draft attached to our last e-mail message) with the City of Rocky
Mount.

   Once these documents are finalized, Allyson and I can continue to
move your project forward.  In the meantime, as you know, Allyson has been
drafting resolutions for adoption by local government officials.

Jonathan M. Fine
Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP
3737 Glenwood Ave., Ste. 400
Raleigh, NC 27612
TEL: (919) 420-1700
FAX: (919) 420-1800


I didn't know that you were talking to Jennifer.  I had put her on the list
of attendees at last Thursday's meeting with Tom Gros.  He had asked about
someone being included that had been involved with Enron Online, I felt that
she might be perfect to be involved in Networks with her exposure to EOL.  I
don't know whether or not you realized that she was in the room for that
conference call.  What is she going to do for you in gas?  We may be
hardpressed to find another strong candidate for the Networks project who has
been as involved with EOL.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 05:28 PM
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
06/05/2000 04:59 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Aghh!

Brent Price just stole Jennifer Denny - no discussion or anything.  So I
obviously will get Scott Mills in return!
Louise


Ken, Jeff , Joe & Cliff,

This is a copy a note I sent to PR(Steve Kean & John Ambler), IR(Mark Koenig)
and Enron India(Sanjay Bhatnagar & Jimmy Mogal) regarding our internal
announcement to  EGEP/EOGIL employees in Houston and India on October 13,
2000.

On Friday (last night Houston time) we announced to employees Enron's
decision to sell Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. (EOGIL), our subsidiary that owns
a 30% interest in the Panna, Mukta and Tapti concession areas.    We now have
bankers involved and a data room is being prepared in Houston which  made it
extremely difficult to keep the deal quiet any longer.  There were numerous
rumors circulating through the office, but the reality of the announcement
was still a shock to most of the employees in India and Houston. Basically we
said the following:
 1) Selling assets or companies is a routine part of Enron's strategy to
redeploy capital in the higher return opportunities.  The company has
exposure to a number of tremendous opportunities today that were not
envisioned even twelve months ago.  In line with this strategy, we are
placing EOGIL in the market.
 2) Depending on the success of finding an acceptable buyer for EOGIL,  we
will be reviewing the balance of our portfolio for transfer to other Enron
entities or for sale as separate packages.  We anticipate closing the EOGIL
transaction and rationalizing the remaining portfolio by March 31, 2001.
 3) Pending the success outlined in item #2, we will eliminate Enron Global
E&P as an Enron business unit on March 31, 2001.
 4) We announced some interim staff changes to facilitate the process.
  a) Jeff Sherrick would re-focus his time largely on the sale process
  b) Mike Stewart will be responsible for all India activity except the sale
process
  c) Steve Harper will be responsible for EGEP's sale activity and
coordination with our bankers and Corporate Development
 5) Commented on the potential impact to employees in general terms.  We told
them it was pre-mature to outline all of the possibilities until we signed a
PSA with a buyer.  However, in general, there is a good likelihood that many
people will either have opportunities for future employment with the buyers
or through redeployment within Enron.  Those people that do not remain with
the assets or are not redeployed in Enron will be involuntarily terminated
March 31, 2001 unless they are needed to close a transaction or to provide
transition services to a buyer.

I would like to keep this as low-keyed as possible.  Last year when we were
for sale there were not a lot of comments, but you never know.  If anyone in
the media picks up on this I would expect it to happen early next week.  Mike
Stewart is currently in India in the Mumbai office (01191228395841) and can
be reached at the Mariott after-hours(01191228577878).  He is fully briefed
on our position regarding the activities within EGEP and EOGIL.  Mike will be
traveling offshore and to Baroda over the weekend and on Monday.  I will be
available all weekend and next week at the following numbers; (work)
713-853-5934, (home) 281-320-2198, (cell) 713-569-4713.  I would suggest
talking with Mike or I before making any comments to the media if possible.

This afternoon I notified our partners and the Gov't of India of our
intention to market our assets.  I will be making a trip to India soon to
visit with the appropriate people in these organizations within the next two
weeks.  While I wouldn't expect this to happen, please refer any inquiries
from our partners (ONGC and Reliance) or the GOI to Mike or me.  As you might
expect, we want to be careful and consistent in our message to these
groups.

I will keep you informed regarding any changes to the above.  If you have any
questions, contact me at the above numbers.

jeff


Thanks for getting those tickets - it sounds like its going to be a great
opening day.  If you can FEDEX them to my office address that would be
great.  Do you know who has the Final Four tickets?  Thanks
Ben

Office Address:
Attn: Ben Rogers
Floor 3116d
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002


If you need anything further, please call me at extension 53218.

Thanks,

Jessica


Dear Mr. Brannen,

Jeff has left for the day, so has not yet seen your note.  However, I wanted
to let you know that the timing may not work on February 15.  He is attending
a board meeting that morning, which is followed by a luncheon.  There is not
much daylight in the afternoon, either, but I'll check with him first thing
Monday morning to see if there is anything we can do to free up a few minutes.

Have a nice weekend.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Bill Brannen <BBrannen@angus-group.com> on 02/09/2001 02:49:59 PM
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Meeting in Houston

Hi Jeff,

Update:  I am a good friend of John Millers in Atlanta. We actually met at
his wedding.

I am coming to Houston next week and have a 1:30 appt on the 15th.  with
Bill Donovan to demonstrate what we do...long story but he is excited to see
what we do.

I was thinking maybe we could grab an early lunch before the meeting.

Let me know.

Bill

Bill Brannen
VP Sales and Marketing
Angus Systems Group, Inc. - Atlanta
2050 Marconi Drive
Suite 125
Alpharetta,GA 30005
770-521-5553
770-521-5998 FAX
678-641-7697 Cell
bbrannen@angus-group.com
www.angus-group.com
sales.angus-group.com

Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attached documents contain
confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose. The
information contained in this electronic message is private and protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying or distribution, or the taking of any action based on
the contents of this information, is strictly prohibited.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 12:39 PM
---------------------------

"scott neal" <sneal12@mindspring.com> on 04/20/2001 08:37:28 PM
To: <Scott.Neal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

The Dow  topped out in February of 1966 at 995. By September of that year the
Dow had  tumbled to 744. The Dow then rallied to a high of 943 in September
of '67. By  March of '68 the Dow had fallen to 825, only to climb to a highly
speculative  peak of 985 in December of '68. The Dow then sank to 631 in
December of '70.

By April of '71 the Dow had climbed back to 950, only to fall to 869 in
February of '72. A big rally then took the Dow (unconfirmed) to a record high
of  1051 in January of '73, turning everyone bullish. But by December of '73
the Dow  had collapsed to 788. Think that was bad - by December of '74 the
Dow had sunk  to a bear market low of 577. At that time, the gurus and
geniuses of Wall Street  were predicting a 250 Dow and many were talking
openly about the end of  capitalism. Of course, that was the bottom

And that's  the way the greatest bear market since the Depression worked its
way down. By  late 1974 investors were dizzy, they were desperate, they were
wrung-out, they  had left Wall Street, many for  good.


Here is Sheri Cromwell's new puppy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cromwell, Sheri L.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Bushman, Teresa G.; Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject:	FW: Our new addition to the family . . .

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cromwell, Sheri L.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Chris Cromwell (E-mail); Cookie McKee (E-mail); David Miller (E-mail); Elaine Miller (E-mail); Mary Bieker (E-mail); Nancy Cromwell (E-mail); Stacy Dickson (E-mail); Teresa Bushman (E-mail); Noske, Linda J.; McVicker, Maureen; Dorsey, Joyce; Schiller, Marsha; Deleonardis, Cathy; Heinitz, Mary J.
Cc:	Dobernecker, Jan
Subject:	Our new addition to the family . . .


<<YPO 2001.jpg>>  <<YPO COUPLE RETREAT REGISTRATION FORM.doc>>

REMINDER!!!

THE DEADLINE FOR SIGNING UP FOR THE

ROCKIN' IN THE ROCKIES  COUPLES RETREAT

IS MAY 15TH.

WE ARE FILLING UP QUICKLY.

 - YPO 2001.jpg
 - YPO COUPLE RETREAT REGISTRATION FORM.doc


Jennifer,

I e-mailed my mail stop number to Rebecca Torres (EB3125A) on Oct.30. and
left her a voice mail message yesterday. I just sent her the info. again.

CD


FYI: I feel great! I guess I got all the sleep I needed. I call you in the
afternoon.

Craig


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 77422 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Hi Kate,

ref 476601
Tom Alonso
Prebon shows this deal as Enron buying and Morgan selling

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/07/2000 05:10 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 12-7-00 Checkout

Mike is entering that deal right now. I'll get back to you with the deal
number.

Thanks,
Kate


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
11:17 AM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 02/01/2000 02:46:47 PM
To: Dora _Thurmond@UnitedDC.com, Sandra_Hernandez@UnitedDC.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/25/2000 01:32 PM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@mwk.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

This is sooooo very true.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 01/25/2000 01:25:08 PM
To: Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber
Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rose
Botello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet Williams/HOU/ECT@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Michelle Neville                           01/25/2000 01:04 PM

To: Alicia Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paula Pierre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Moses/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, amelia_hinton@valic.com,
danaa@corbettstaff.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra R
McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Ramirez/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:00 PM ---------------------------

Jessica Anaya
01/25/2000 08:47 AM
To: Leslie Linares/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Etelvina
Guerra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, sbellard@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Jessica Anaya/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 08:46
AM ---------------------------

Helen Martinez <helenmar1980@yahoo.com> on 01/24/2000 09:01:56 PM
To: Jessica Anaya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Anaya <madaa@swbell.net>, Yanett Anaya
<Yanett2121@hotmail.com>, Keziah Apura <kweenpobby@aol.com>, Carmen Cantu
<ccantu_79@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

X-Apparently-To: helenmar1980@yahoo.com via mdd202.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: -50
Received: from law-f256.hotmail.com (HELO hotmail.com) (209.185.130.172)  by
mta121.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2000 23:26:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 33988 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2000 23:26:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20000124232643.33987.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 152.163.197.74 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
 Mon, 24 Jan 2000
15:26:43 PST
X-Originating-IP: [152.163.197.74]
From: "Rios Belinda" <b_line78@hotmail.com>
To: lmsol@aol.com, mmederes@yahoo.com, bryan.snoddy@scott.af.mil,
neh21@alltel.net, shelbeekay@aol.com, arreliz@aol.com,  helenmar1980@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:26:43 PST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Length: 4268

>From: "Beverly Wehmeyer" <BWehmeyer@gpsolaw.com>
>To: <ALeon57383@aol.com>,<Lybw1@aol.com>,
><melly4260@aol.com>,<Jennifer.Diaz@cna.com>, <b_line78@hotmail.com>
>Subject: So Very True...
>Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:14:46 -0600
>
> >> Subject:     So very true. Everyone must read this. It's beautiful
> >>
> >> Happiness......
> >>
> >> We convince ourselves that life will be better after we get married,
>have
>
> >> a
> >> baby, then another. Then we're frustrated that the kids aren't old
>enough
>
> >> and we'll be more content when they are. After that, we're frustrated
>that
>
> >> we have teenagers to deal with. We'll certainly be happy when they're
>out
>
> >> of
> >> that stage.
> >>
> >> We tell ourselves that our life will be complete when our spouse gets
>his
>
> >> or
> >> her act together, when we get a nicer car, are able to go on a nice
> >> vacation,  when we retire.
> >>
> >> The truth is, there's no better time to be happy than right now. If not
> >> now,
> >> when?
> >>
> >> Your life will always be filled with challenges. It's best to admit
>this
>
> >> to
> >> yourself and decide to be happy anyway.
> >>
> >> One of my favorite quotes comes from Alfred D. Souza.  He said, "For a
> >> long
> >> time it had seemed to me that life was about to begin - real life. But
> >> there
> >> was
> >> always some obstacle in the way, something to be gotten through first,
> >> some
> >> unfinished business, time still to be served, or a debt to be paid.
> >>
> >>
> >> Then life would begin.  At last it dawned on me that these obstacles
>were
>
> >> my
> >> life."
> >>
> >> This perspective has helped me to see that there is no way to
>happiness.
>
> >> Happiness is the way.  So, treasure every moment that you have and
> >> treasure
> >> it more because you shared it with someone special, special enough to
> >> spend
> >> your time with...and remember that time waits for no one.
> >>
> >>
> >> So, stop waiting until you finish school, until you go back to school,
> >> until
> >> you lose ten pounds, until you gain ten pounds, until you have kids,
>until
>
> >> your kids leave the house, until you start work, until you retire,
>until
>
> >> you
> >> get married, until you get divorced, until Friday night, until Sunday
> >> morning, until you get a new car or home, until your car or home is
>paid
>
> >> off, until spring, until summer, until fall, until winter, until you're
> >> off
> >> welfare, until the first or fifteenth, until your song comes on, until
> >> you've had a drink, until you've sobered up, until you die, until
>you're
>
> >> born again to decide that there is no better time than right now to be
> >> happy.
> >>
> >> Happiness is a journey, not a destination.
> >>
> >> Thought for the day:
> >> Work like you don't need money,
> >> Love like you've never been hurt,
> >> And dance like no one's watching.
> >>
> >>
> >> An Angel To Watch over You
> >> Some people  come into our lives  and quickly go..
> >> Some people  become  friends  and stay a while.. leaving beautiful
> >> footprints on our  hearts and we are never quite the same because we
>have
>
> >> made a good friend!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Yesterday is history.
> >> Tomorrow a mystery.
> >> Today is a gift.
> >> That's why it's called the present!
> >>
> >> I think this is special.....
> >> live and savor every moment.....
> >> this is not a dress rehearsal!
> >>
> >>
> >>   (\           /)
> >>   ( \  __  / )
> >>    ( \ (  ) / )
> >>    (( /<>\ ))           TAKE THIS LITTLE ANGEL
> >>    ( / \/\/  \ )           AND KEEP HER CLOSE TO
> >>      (       )             YOU SHE IS YOUR GUARDIAN
> >>      (       )             ANGEL SENT TO WATCH
> >>      (       )             OVER YOU~~~~~~
> >>
> >>
> >> THIS IS A SPECIAL GUARDIAN ANGEL... YOU MUST PASS THIS ON TO 5 PEOPLE
> >> WITHIN
> >> THE HOUR OF RECEIVING HER..AFTER YOU DO MAKE A WISH....IF YOU HAVE
>PASSED
>
> >> HER ON, YOUR WISH WILL BE  GRANTED AND SHE'LL WATCH OVER YOU
>FOREVER....IF
>
> >> NOT..HER TEARS  WILL FLOW AND NO WISHES WILL BE GRANTED....
> >>
> >> Now don't delete this message,because it comes from a very special
>angel.
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf on 01/08/2001 03:13 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Revised GE TPA and Letter

Per our chat.

Rose
----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:12 PM -----

	Roseann Engeldorf
	01/08/2001 01:34 PM

		 To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Revised GE TPA and Letter

Letter

My main comment is that the letter states that "ENA has received the
requisite mangagement approvals required to execute" the TPA and pay the
Order Commitment Payment and the 5% payment.  I cannot sign off on this
because I do not have any evidence that ENA has received such approval - you
should have an ENA lawyer sign off on the letter and the authorization
requirements of the TPA.    My initials are for the review of the documents
to ensure that they comport with the requirements of the financing documents
only.

TPA

In Sections 1(c) and (d) - "month's" should be "months" - I believe in this
case we need a plural, not a possessive.

Should have a semicolon at the end of Section 3(a)(2).   The last sentence of
3(a) is a little garbled - maybe the phrase "must be met" should be deleted.

In Section 5(b)(4), I suggest you add the phrase "unless otherwise agreed by
the Parties" at the end of the sentence.

I assume that the "Order Commitment Payment" is really an option payment - if
it is not, it should be made clear that it can be credited against the
termination payment.

Thanks,

Rose

	Mike J Miller@ECT
	01/08/2001 12:06 PM

		 To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Revised GE TPA and Letter

Attached is the latest revision of the GE Turbine Purchase Agreement and a
cover letter from yours truly.  Both have been modified to reflect Lisa Bills
comments on contracting entity, language used in the December TurboPark
closing and good general editing cleanup.  I would like to get this out to GE
tonight so that I can put our best foot forward for GE's turbine process
meeting on Tuesday morning.  On another note, Lisa and Rose, could you take a
quick look at the cover letter and get me comments.  I will not send any of
this out until Janet has gotten Dave Delainey's approval.

Regards,

Mike J Miller


Thanks--I'll pass that info on to the employment guys.  df

From:	Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/23/2001 03:29 PM
To:	"Susan Scott (E-mail)" <sscott3@enron.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Kisluk/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Britt Davis/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	Need any law help?

A friend of a friend (Petula Workman) is looking for a part time legal position.
She is a great lawyer -- was on law review, people who worked with her love
her, but she just wants a part time gig since she is a mom with kid
responsibilities.

She wants to work part-time (20-24 hours/week) preferably employment litigation, but commercial litigation would work too.

If you have need or know of someone who does, let me know and I'll get her resume for you.

thanks
kevin hyatt


where are you at now baby ?

ILY
dq

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	good morning

Hi honey- we moved so am unpacking at new location
have a great day
love
kq


Rick,

Aram is coming to Houston, in my view, to explore the possibility of coming
back to Enron
(given uncertain situation under the Scottish rule at the old Pacificorp).

I shall suggest that he meet  with you and/or Ted Murphy as well.

I can wait for Karen to come back. It's not urgent. We are still working on
the volumetric  risk module and the team is making a very good progress.
They gave a  presentation today to Rick Carson and me.

We have to decide what comes next  (Asset/Liability Model or
Operational Risk Model).

Vince


chris,
why did this point not come up as a foreign key violation?  apparently, it's been posted on the web since May 25th.
thanks,
tara

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyde, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:59 PM
To: Smith, Matt
Cc: Piazze, Tara
Subject: RE: New DRN

done :-)

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Matt
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 2:46 PM
To: Hyde, Chris
Cc: Piazze, Tara
Subject: New DRN

Chris,

Please add the following new point to the database for PGT (#15) and make sure we begin to scape it along with the others:

DRN:  288499
Name:  Klamath Cogeneration - PacifiCorp

This is a scraped point currently being posted.  This DRN is the same as the IHS DRN for this point.

Thanks.

Mat


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Cc:	Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	** Amended ** EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-12-01

Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation has been added.


are spouses invited?


Patrice,

Petro has been added.

Thank you,
Stephanie x33465

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lees, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Subject:	FW: New counterparty for mid-market client

Please handle and follow up with Patrice.

Thanks.  LL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Lees, Lisa
Subject:	New counterparty for mid-market client

Hi Lisa,

Will you please add Petro-Canada Oil and Gas to the list of counterparties for Mid-Market.

Thanks


Thanks for the note.  I am also glad we got to know each other this year.  We
will have to make time to hang out next year, now that your LSAT is over.

Have fun in Denver and be careful of who you hang out with up there.

Merry Christmas,
Gerald

	Janel Guerrero@ENRON
	12/20/2000 08:50 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi.  I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas and tell you that I'm really
glad we got to know each other this year and could hang out over the summer.
I know it's been a difficult year for you, but 2001 is in reach and I'm
absolutely positive there are happy times and much fullfilment ahead of you.
Enjoy the holidays, and I'll see you next year!

xx
janel

ps....Brucie is picking me up at the airport thursday night so i'll deliver
some xmas love from you.


U forgot to copy you brother.  I don't think he did it.  I think it just
kicked in somehow.

Jerry W Germany <germanj@basf-corp.com> on 04/23/2001 04:42:57 PM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Update

Ya'll reckon the old Coot had all this planned so if there was any problem
form
marriage, family etc, this automatically happened.   He probably did this back
when he was swapping land with Bertha and did not plan on us having to do this
again in the future.  MMMM, interesting.   Hey did he leave any of the land to
me or just you guys???

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/23/2001 01:13:03 PM
To:   wdgermanyjr, Jerry W Germany
cc:
Subject:  Update

Spoke to Mary last night.  She's doing well and I know you both care.  She
said Bernie Max was in surgery for 4 hours on Friday to have a melanoma
spot removed from his collar bone - not good.  She found out about it
indirectly somehow.  Gerald and Shirley didn't know about the surgery
either.

I should have an update on our legal issues by the end of the day.

I just spoke with "Wendy" in the Cherokee County Appraisal District.  She
said all of Dad's property was transferred to us back in August of 2000.  I
told her that seemed odd since the property was still in probate.  She said
that there was a special warranty deed transferring the property to us and
that Mary Esquivel had agreed to transfer the property.  Don't know how
that happened and don't care.  She also said that we need to fill out the
ag expemtion on both pieces of property.  The one I have is for the 31
acres.  Don, she will mail the other application to you at P.O. Box 532,
Brazoria  77422.  She will also mail a copy of the last application Dad
filled out.  We need to get the completed applications back to them in May
(does not have to be May 1).

Love you MAN!!


I will be out of the office on Monday, January 14th; back in the office on Tuesday January 15th.  If you need assistance, please contact Esther Dasilva at (713) 853-5789 or at esther.dasilva@enron.com     Thanks!

Craig