Attached, please find an article from today's Sacramento Bee regarding the SCE MOU, as well as a terrific editorial from Daniel Weintraub regarding direct access.

Californians oppose Edison deal, poll finds

By Amy Chance
Bee Political Editor
(Published Sept. 25, 2001)

Californians by large margins oppose Gov. Gray Davis' proposal to use state-backed bonds to prevent Southern California Edison from slipping into bankruptcy, according to a Field Poll released Monday.

Overall, the new poll found that Californians' concern about the electricity shortage has eased considerably. They give themselves credit for proving power blackout predictions wrong with strong conservation efforts.

But they are in no mood as taxpayers or ratepayers to help bolster the finances of a key investor-owned utility.

The poll noted that Edison "is in danger of declaring bankruptcy" and asked those surveyed whether "to avoid this possibility" they supported a proposal in which Edison would issue $2.9 billion in state-backed bonds to be repaid by its customers over time.

Adults statewide opposed the idea 66 percent to 23 percent; registered voters were against it 68 percent to 21 percent.

Pollster Mark DiCamillo noted that a large majority of Southern California Edison's own customers -- 70 percent -- were opposed to the plan.

One factor, he said, may be the public's view of bankruptcy.

"With PG&E in bankruptcy, nothing has really changed for PG&E customers," he said. "That may have some influence on their attitudes."

The Democratic governor has sought for months to gain legislative support for a plan to prevent Edison from following Pacific Gas and Electric Co. into bankruptcy court, arguing that the state's ability to get out of the power-buying business depends on the effort.

But the Legislature adjourned Sept. 15 without taking final action on a plan. Consumer groups argued vigorously against what they termed a "bailout," and some lawmakers said they didn't see the proposal as a better alternative than bankruptcy.

Davis threatened to call lawmakers back to the Capitol to address the issue within two weeks, angering Senate President Pro Tem John Burton. Both the governor and Burton have since said they intend to negotiate before asking legislators to return.

DiCamillo said the numbers indicate that Davis is pursuing an unpopular path that could affect his own re-election effort.

"If he continues to pursue it -- and all indications are that he's going to -- he's expending more of his own political capital on an issue that is clearly not very popular," DiCamillo said. "He may wish to do that. Some people say that's how you define leadership -- when you take your own personal stances because you think they are in the public interest, (not) what people think at the time.

"But some of the medicine he's prescribing is unpalatable. And some of the Democrats in the Legislature have called him on it and said, 'We're not going to go for this. We're running for re-election, too.' "

A Davis adviser said the findings were "no surprise."

"Utilities aren't popular. That's the reality," said Davis political consultant Garry South.

In May, amid predictions that the state would spend the summer suffering through blackouts, 75 percent of Californians saw the situation as "very serious." That number dropped in the latest poll to 44 percent.

Asked to rate the efforts of various groups and officials to improve California's energy outlook, residential energy consumers put themselves at the top of the list, with 55 percent saying they have done a very good or good job.

Californians also saw industry and business as willing to pitch in, as 40 percent described their efforts as good or very good.

They gave higher "poor" marks, meanwhile, to a long list of others -- Davis, the Legislature, President Bush, the state Public Utilities Commission, the state's private utilities, out-of-state energy providers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

And about half said they continue to see rate increases that hit earlier this year as "very" or "somewhat" serious, and expect rates in their area to rise even more in the next 12 months.

"If you asked them to rate how they got out of this situation, they'd say we got ourselves out of it by cutting back -- the politicians didn't help much, the regulatory agencies didn't help much," DiCamillo said. "But they're still irritated because rates have gone up, and they expect them to go up further.

Daniel Weintraub: Now it's illegal to purchase your own electricity

(Published Sept. 25, 2001)

Buying your own has been banned in California. Electricity on the open market is now officially contraband. Like prescription drugs, which you can get only from a licensed pharmacy, electricity is something you can buy from your local utility, which can make its own or buy it from the state. Beyond that, it's an illegal substance.

It was the grand hope of a deregulated electricity industry that you and I and the factory down the street would be able to buy our own juice from the lowest bidder. It might have been a pain -- kind of like shopping for telephone service. But just as breaking up Ma Bell spawned great leaps in mobile phone technology, busting the utility monopoly was supposed to usher in a new era for electricity.

Not that there were mobs of shopkeepers and apartment dwellers lobbying the Legislature for consumer choice. It was the biggest users who really wanted to cut their own deals. Under the old, regulated system, the huge factories that make steel and cement and computers, and gobble up electricity by the megawatt, were paying 50 percent more than their competitors in other states. They wanted the right to shop around.

The Legislature agreed, but only to a point. Lawmakers permitted choice, but they rigged the new system in its early years to favor the utilities that were a powerful force in the Capitol. They made it nearly impossible for the private generators to undercut the utilities' pricing, and they put roadblocks in the way of cities that might have gathered their small customers together and used their market clout to negotiate for lower rates.

The government spent millions on an advertising campaign trying to persuade us of the wisdom of buying our own energy. But there weren't really many deals to be had. Now there are none.

Consumer choice died a quiet death last week at the hands of the Public Utility Commission. Its demise was collateral damage from the mess that was California's experiment in electricity deregulation.

Choice couldn't survive because the state, which now controls the energy business, can't cope with the competition. If Californians were allowed to buy their own electricity, pretty soon most of us would figure out that we are getting a rotten deal from the state. As more people left the state system, the few that remained would have to pay higher and higher rates to keep the books balanced. Eventually, the whole thing would collapse of its own weight.

We're in this fix because Gov. Gray Davis, when he stepped in to buy electricity on behalf of the failing utilities in January, went too far. Craving stability at any price, Davis bought almost all the energy the state will need for the next few years and much of what we'll need for a decade. And he bought that electricity at the top of the market, paying prices that had never been so high, and might never be again.

As those prices were passed along to consumers, suddenly choosing your own electricity supplier got more attractive than ever. Thousands of businesses jumped at the opportunity. Among them were the big steel factories in the Inland Empire region east of Los Angeles.

Tamco Steel of Rancho Cucamonga, which makes rebar, realized its annual electricity bill was going to climb from $12 million to $26 million if it stayed with the local utility, Southern California Edison, according to a report in the Riverside Press-Enterprise. The company, which just laid off 70 people, one-fourth of its workers, desperately started searching for cheaper energy. It signed a deal with a private supplier on Sept. 1, just days before the state slammed the door shut on such opportunities.

That's a scenario that was repeated up and down the state all summer, and it illustrates why, in the twisted world of electricity regulation, the Public Utilities Commission had to step in and just say no. Without the ban there would have been a "jailbreak," in the words of one commissioner, leaving small customers or the taxpayers holding the bag.

That decision might have been unavoidable, given the circumstances. But it didn't have to be this way. Davis could have swallowed hard and ridden out the storm earlier this year. He could have signed electricity contracts for shorter terms at higher prices. That would have been painful, financially and politically, but once the crisis passed, Californians would have been free again to set their own course. Instead, we are imprisoned in a high-priced, state-run system, and will be for years to come.

California, in fact, is worse off than it was in 1995, when companies stuck with high utility rates first asked for the freedom to buy their own electricity. This does not seem like an unreasonable request, an act that should be against the law. Yet now it is. The real crime, though, is the state bungling that destroyed the electricity industry.


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010402.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 115.48 / Final: 115.45)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/4/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Hi Li,

How about next week sometime?  Glad to help.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sun, Li
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Hello!

Dear Jeff,

How are you doing? I hope everything is all right with you. I just came back from Wharton undergrad interview, it was good, we have very strong candidates, and hopefully we can have them as many as possible. It is a pity that you were not there.

Will you have time to chat a couple of minutes? I need to figure out my career path at Enron and I really need your help. And I will really appreciate it!

Looking forward to speaking to you!

Li
X37441


Jay,

The documents I located that need to be added to your spreadsheet are as follows:

	Reliant Energy Services, Inc.		Base Agreement for Wholesale Power
						Supplemental Agreement - ERCOT
						EEI - Power

	Reliant Energy, Incorporated		Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement

Call if you have any questions.

Laurie
ext. 35557


Bummer.  Thanks for the quick answer.  The Maritimes case does give us at
least a small foothold to use.  DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/04/2000 11:08 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: Gallup request for rehearing

My several hours of on-line research on this last Sept. turned up nothing on
point.  The only case that even addressed the issue of confidentiality of
contracts in a certificate context was one I'll excerpt here:

**
 In Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C., 80 FERC P 61,346 (1997),
Maritimes requested confidentiality for the precedent agreements it
submitted. Commission staff denied the blanket request, but indicated that
Maritimes could request that specific provisions be kept confidential.
Maritimes subsequently requested that the contract terms and various cut-off
dates [FN29] in the precedent agreements be kept confidential because such
information was commercially sensitive. On the other hand, Maritimes
requested that the terms and conditions of the backstop agreements be kept
confidential, but was willing to make the contract terms of 10 and 20 years
public. Generally, the Commission will deny blanket requests for
confidentiality of agreements that are submitted to demonstrate market
support for new facilities. [FN30] However, in the instance case, the
contract terms of the backstop agreements are public and, thus, evidence of
longterm subscriptions for Maritimes proposal are in the public record and
support our finding that Maritimes has demonstrated a market for its proposed
services. Therefore, we find no compelling reason to require the length of
the terms of the other precedent agreements or the cut-off dates to be made
public.

FN29 Cut off dates refer to points in time when individual contracts could
terminate contingent on the
occurrence of certain events.

FN30 See, e.g., Colorado Interstate Gas Company, 76 FERC P 61,291 (1996).
**

In Amoco Production Company and Amoco Energy Trading Company V. Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America, 82 FERC P 61,037 (1998), which involved a
request for confidentiality of a gas sales agreement, the Commission
explained why a gas sales agreement should be given confidential treatment
but transportation contracts should not:

the Commission has explicitly held that gas transportation rates stand on a
different
footing from gas sales rates because pipelines and their competitors are
subject to similar disclosure
requirements. In ANR Pipeline Co., the Commission explained that unlike gas
sales in a
competitive market, transportation of natural gas is still regulated under
the assumption that the pipeline
exercises market power. Even where transportation competition exists, that
competition is from other
pipelines that are likely to be subject to similar filing and reporting
requirements.

There were several cases denying confidential treatment of rates in the
context of Section 4 cases.

Just to make sure I found everything, I'll do some follow up sometime in the
next few days and let you know if I find anything.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           02/04/2000 10:43 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com,
fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: Gallup request for rehearing

Susan's draft has inspired me to vent months worth of frustration at the
Commission.  To save Susan from trying to translate my weird scribbles, I'm
having Martha type up my vitriol.  Please hold off on detailed comments on
Susan's draft unless you've already finished them.  I'll circulate a revised
draft to you all later today.  In the mean time, Susan and Frank and Steve,
are there not some cases in which the Commission has specifically granted
confidential treatment of precedent agreements or discount agreements in
expansion cases.  I know the bulk of authority is against us, but I seem to
recall at least a few stray decisions where the Commission granted confid.
treatment (even if only for a limited time).  Lets talk.  Thanks. DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:52 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Here is the attachment...

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 02/03/2000
03:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:51 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Attached is my draft of a request for rehearing.  It incorporates Mr.
Stojic's and Mr. Kelly's initial comments.  Please review it and let me know
if you have any comments on or before Tuesday afternoon (I will be out of the
office Monday).  Thank you!


Vlady- you may have to do this for me as I will be in NYC the day before with Moody's and there is a chance I will be delayed. We should develop what we want to say together so either of us can speak. Tx Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Janet
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:12 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Shively, Hunter S.; Gaskill, Chris; Buy, Rick; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Tawney, Mark; Cox, David
Subject:	Re: EES Summer Series

Forgot to tell you to click on the "Click here to RSVP"  for a real laugh!
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES on 06/07/2001 11:10 PM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
06/07/2001 07:03 PM
To:	Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Hunter S Shively/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris Gaskill/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Tawney/Enron@EnronXGate, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject:	Re: EES Summer Series

Wanted you to see what we sent out. We'll schedule Weather and Broadband in July. Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES on 06/07/2001 07:01 PM ---------------------------

Cheryl Lipshutz
06/07/2001 06:09 PM
To:	Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Re: EES Summer Series

Great looking invite!!  I particularly like the click button to RSVP - very clever!

 	Enron Energy Services  From:  EES Office of Chairman                           06/07/2001 04:31 PM

Sent by:	EES Distribution
To:	All EES
cc:
Subject:	EES Summer Series

The Brown Bags have experienced a successful Winter/Spring run and are taking a well-deserved summer vacation.
While the Brown Bags are away, Janet Dietrich, EES's President, would like to present:

The Summer Series will include weekly presentations from subject matter experts within Enron designed to broaden the scope of knowledge about different Enron businesses.  EES employees will have the opportunity to learn first hand about subjects such as the US Power Market, the US Gas Market, RAC, Weather Derivatives, Broadband Connectivity, Distributed Generation, DSM, Load Acquisition and Sourcing & Supply from the experts themselves.

The Summer Series premiers on June 13 with the following scheduled presentations:

June 13 - The US Power Market with Rogers Herndon
June 20 - The US Gas Market with Hunter Shively and Chris Gaskill
June 27 - Risk Assessment and Controls with Rick Buy

Presentations will be held each Wednesday in Room 5C2 from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Lunches will be provided.  Attendance is by RSVP only.
Click here  to RSVP for the series premier.

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


John,

Thanks for the article.
I was off for the last few days and I ma catching up
with my mail.
I shall call you during the next few days.

Vince

"John H Herbert" <jhh1@email.msn.com> on 01/21/2001 05:27:05 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Demand price elasticities

Here are excerpts from some work I recently did for EPRI. Perhaps you will
find it of some interest.

I don't have the right to send you the whole article but I was allowed to
send you some excerpts.

Naturally, this is intended for you alone.

Best regards,

JHHerbert

 - T64-67 nletter 1-01rev.doc


Julie,

If they want to pay $5.15, that's fine with me.  I do have $5.11 in the
system but I could
have easily made a mistake.  Let me know if you have any other questions.

Kevin

P.S.  Sorry it took me so long to reply.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	JesPulliam@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-JesPulliam+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 6:13 PM
To:	jkbowles@hotmail.com; caycie.c.ayres@accenture.com; edrington@uthscsa.edu; Lisa.A.Thielemann@chase.com; sscott5@enron.com; EBoon@thlee.com; shardie@dm-art.org; ashley.marynick@chase.com; caramuss@yahoo.com; elise_harper@mckinsey.com
Subject:	so they say NEVER SAY NEVER. . .

I swore I would be one of those people who said never and really meant it.
Well, I guess "they" are right . . .
Clay and I have some news.  (No, I am not pregnant.)  But, we are buying a
house in Dallas.  We close on it two days after my arrival in London.
Thankfully, Clay will still be here.  We will rent it out over the next year
while we are away.  Our move in date will be sometime next summer, depending
on our tenants' situation.
So, about the never say never part.  The house is in south Highland Park.
Gasp!  We never expected to buy a house this soon.  And, I NEVER--I repeat
NEVER-- expected that we would move to Highland Park upon graduating from law
school, if EVER!  In fact, it was a condition of our marriage--I knew that we
were going to end up in Dallas, but I made Clay promise that we would not
have to settle in the Park Cities.  He promised, crossed his heart, hoped to
die, and the whole bit.  All summer, we have been neighborhood shopping in
Lakewood and East Dallas, an area that is close to downtown with wonderful
homes and a sort of Austiny-feel.
We spent some time checking out real estate cites on the web during our
down-time at work, on a strictly just-for-fun basis.  We loved looking at
older homes.  We dreamed about eventually getting something that was very
livible for the time being but that would be really fun to update and
restore.  Independently, we both came across a house in south east Highland
Park (near the McKinney and Knox Henderson area) that was built in 1925 in
the Craftsman style--our favorite.  We drove by it and checked it out on the
internet for about three weeks.  Finally, we decided to call up a realtor and
go see it.  We immediately fell in love--wood floors, beautiful original
fixtures and "rookwood" fireplace, 9 foot ceilings, great backyard, etc.
During the three week period, I had a huge and slightly dramatic internal
debate about living in this area.  Would this mean I was destined to a life
of suburban-driving, PTA morning, bubble head-ism???  Would we ever be able
to escape our parents who live merely 5-7 minutes away?  Was I, deep-down,
really a total snob?  If not, would I become one?  Would I have to go to the
neighborhood Tom Thumb?  Would I become my mother?
The bottom line was that we loved the house--the craftsman style lets us to
combine Clay's desire for traditionalism and my love for modern design.  (In
other words, it's a place where my red leather couch and his stuffed deer
head might live comfortable together.)  Also, we really loved the location (6
minutes from Downtown; right by our favorite restaurants and bar spots; and
very close to the Katy Trail--Dallas' jogging biking trail).  So, I decided
that we could make  Park Cities life work. . . I would just have to
concentrates on the things that I always have said I WILL do, rather than the
things I have said I would NEVER do.  I will invest in the lives of needy
people; I will keep painting; I will remember that people, instead of things,
make the world go 'round.
After much prayer and consideration, Clay and I put down a REALLY low-ball
offer on the house.  We negotiated for about a week, and the sellers finally
accepted our offer.  We feel terribly blessed, and our prayer is that our
home can be put to use for God's purposes.  (And, perhaps, a TX-OU party??)
I am thankful for a husband who was fortunate enough to save every penny he
ever earned and every little birthday check he ever received--and for a
father-in-law who helped us get an excellent interest rate.
So, that's the news . . . let the making fun of Jessica begin . . . I
certainly deserve it.  Too bad I am leaving the country in a matter of
days!!!
Hope you guys are doing well.  I will have email in London, so shoot me one
whenever possible!  You can reach me via Clay's cell phone until Friday
(214)649-6914.  Sorry this message was so long.  Much love and big hugs to
you all.
Bate :)


Please see below.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

Mark McCoy@ENRON
09/29/2000 08:56 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey
Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cornhusker Contact Information

Lone Star Pipeline
Lisa McAuliff (Contracts)  Wilma Easter (Scheduling)
phone:  214-875-5224  phone: 214-875-3296
fax: 214-875-5134  fax: 214-875-3810

301 S. Harwood #801N
Dallas, TX 75201

Williams Energy
Jeff Goforth
phone: 918-573-8125
fax: 918-573-1530

PO Box 2848
Tulsa, OK 74101

Cinergy Marketing & Trading (Agent for Apache)
Lisa Hughes
phone: 281-583-6279
fax: 281-583-4353

616 FM 1960 W #800
Houston, TX 77090

(Note:  Cinergy will be moving downtown next month)

White Pine Energy, LLC
Michael Mazowita-Director of Asset Mgmt
phone:  248-442-4823
fax: 248-477-5729
cell: 248-345-4002

19436 Auburndale Street
Livonia, MI 48152


Cool.  If $150 don't cut it on the check, just let me know.  No sweat.  EVERYTHING is confidential.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Laughlin [mailto:scottwl@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Re: Golf Anyone?

YOur e-mails are like icebergs. Four lines of text, and then a whole mound
of explanation underneath.

Cameron and I are talking about the golf. It's looking good, but I'm not yet
sure what day. I'll e-mail you later with the final verdict.

And I got the check. Cheers.

>From: "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>
>To: <psellers@pacbell.net>,   "Nancy Sellers (E-mail)"
><Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>,   "eldon sellers (E-mail)"
><eldon@direcpc.com>,   "Scott Laughlin (E-mail)" <scottwl@hotmail.com>,
><cameron@perfect.com>
>Subject: Golf Anyone?
>Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:26:52 -0500
>
>Looks like Prentice and Nancy will be getting together in Napa to do a
>little bonding this weekend.  Therefore, it looks like an opportunity to
>golf on Saturday or Sunday (screw football).  Any takers?  (Eldon has
>promised not to be the score Nazi.)
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I just saw the NYT article.  Nice job.  It's nicely positioned as an issue
about India's resolve to encourage foreign investment and live up to
contracts.


BLOOMBERG
All O.k.

PREBON WEST
All o.k.

AMEREX WEST
All o.k.


Per Brian's request, see below.
------------------ Forwarded by Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000 09:51 AM
---------------------------

Brian Redmond
04/21/2000 09:30 AM
To: Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elisabeth McCabe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom
Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of April 19 Vision and Values Meeting

Tom,  Can you forward to the rest of theENA V&V team.

Thanks,
Brian
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Gina Taylor@EES
04/20/2000 03:03 PM
To: V&v Task Force
cc:
Subject: Summary of April 19 Vision and Values Meeting

Team,

Great meeting yesterday.  Thanks for your participation.  There's lots of
great things going on throughout the organization!

Below summarizes the key points of our April 19 meeting:

Executive Committee Update
Our meeting with the Executive Committe to provide an update on Vision and
Values is scheduled for Monday, May 15 at 11:45 for 30 minutes in the
Boardroom.  Presenters include George Wasaff, Craig Sutter, Kirk McDaniel,
Dave Schafer, Brian Redmond, Dick Amabile, Rachael Tobor, Gina Taylor/Beth
Tilney and Cindy Olson.   Each presenter is responsible for presenting the
key points/accomplishments of their sub-committee.
Presenters, please review your section of the presentation and "tighten" it
up.  Each topic should have ONLY 1 slide.  Submit your changes to me by
Tuesday, April 26.
An updated presentation will be emailed to the team by Friday, April 28.
During the week of May 1 - May 5, each V&V rep should meet with their
Executive Committee member to provide an overview of what will be presented
on May 15.
Please provide any feedback as a result of these meetings to me by Monday,
May 8.
Ken, Jeff, and Joe will receive the final presentation by Wednesday, May 10.

Excellence Through Communication
Each Business Unit/Global Function provided an update on Action Plans and
feedback to the ETC survey.  At a glance, all of the Business Units/Global
Functions find value in the custom questions.  Also, mail lists for the
October 2000 survey need to be updated and the ease of accessing the survey
needs to be consistent across business units/global functions.
Dick Amabile will summarize the update and forward it to all of the members
of the Task Force.
In the June V&V meeting, we will link up with the ETC survey team to begin
discussions for the October 2000 survey.

Sub-Committe Updates
P&D
Please work with your business unit/global function to identify pilots.
Please contact Kirk McDaniel (x368251) or Dick Amabile (x33972) with ideas
for pilots.
The team is currently working the Ad Agency on how to communicate the
benefits and use of this tool with employees.
The team is also considering changing the name from Participation & Dissent.

Communication Training
Work continues to enroll vp's and above in the Executive Impact & Influence
course.  As of 4/19, 179 people (54%) have enrolled in the course with 150
(46%) people not currently enrolled.
The On-line Basic Communication course is on schedule with plans to offer the
course to employees during the 2nd quarter of 2001.

Communication Tools
Results of the email survey and best practice interviews were communicated to
the group.  Action items are currently being developed and implemented based
on the survey feedback.

Internal Communication Campaign
The campaign will formally launch on May 8 with a voicemail from Ken Lay to
employees.  We're also working on a short video of Ken to post on IPTV on the
Intranet.
Elevator monitors will be installed in the elevators over the next 6-8 weeks
with a target launch date of 6-18.  The monitors will display live video,
corporate announcements, and Vision and Values messaging along with other
employee communication.

Best Companies Initiative
An analysis of Enron's 2000 survey results was presented.
An employee letter from the Office of the Chairman was recommended to be
forwarded to those employees reaching career milestones (5, 10, 15, 20, 25
years of service).  Please forward any changes to that letter to Gina Taylor
by Friday, April 28.

Thanks again for a great meeting.

Gina


Letter dictated by Ken Lay

Gene:

 I appreciated the update on your health status.  It appears you are taking a
very tough situation and, with help from some of the best doctors in the
world, setting about to turn it around.  I'm sure it goes without saying that
you know we are all pulling for you and betting on a positive outcome.

 Clearly your health is the number one issue now.  To the extent you want to
work and can work, we are delighted to have you back in the office.  But that
is a very distant secondary concern until you get everything done about your
health that can be done.  If there is any way I or Enron can be of any
further help, please let me know.

Ken


Please note Maviglio's comments in response to Sec of State Bill Jones' claim
that Davis' consultants have violated ethics laws by not filing conflict of
interest reports with the state while working for Davis.  Maviglio sez:

Jones is "on a witch hunt on something outside his jurisdiction."
Mark, quit feeding PR lines to Davis' people.

Best,
Jeff


Where do the discussions with FCE stand?  Also, Stephen will be sending you
the latest draft of the exhibits.  We should discuss because there are some
interesting things in them (to our favor).


Joe,
Do you have any record of this deal?   I should that you worked this day.
If this exists in your personal trade log,  then we need to Enpower this.

Let me know what you find.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacobson, Michael
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	FPL Energy Mktg dispute 9/20/01

JMF,

On 9/20/01 FPL Energy Mktg is showing the following deal that we DO show in the P&L but not in EnPower

HE 13 - 75 mws @ $26

Thanks,
MJ


Guys, gas with a $5.00 handle is not a good thing for this deal - I know we
are pushing this restructuring as fast as we can; however, I think we need to
determine how to move this faster. Any ideas?

Regards
Delainey


Think you're really funny?  Then show us!  Enter the latest Enron Business
Top 10 contest and let us know what you think Enron's New Year's resolutions
should be.  (We'll choose ten winners, so only one resolution per person,
please.)  There may not be flashing lights and balloon drops if you win, but
you will get your name published and a $25 gift certificate to the Signature
Shop!

Enter the Enron Business Top 10 contest in the print publication or through
the online version (go to home.enron.com, click on Publications, then on
Enron Business and Volume 6, 2000).  Deadline is Friday, January 19.

Good luck!


When operational capacity changes during any cycle the below comments will need to inserted into the point
or group comment section in CAS.
1.  Socal Window
2.  Low line pack inventory
3.  I/C or plant non performance
4.  High line pack inventory
5.  Compression status
6.  Other

*During normal business hours except for Evening and ID-2, Myself, Gary, Steve, Terry, or John should be
 responsible for loading comments into CAS unless the Reps. have been given the directive to update comments.
*Weekends, and Holidays, Reps. will be loading comments into CAS.
*When new points or groups show up to be allocated that have not previously been allocated, you will need
 to page me or in my absence Gary, Steve.  We will let you know what to do with the capacity either update
 or allocate.
If you have any questions please call me or page.

Thanks DS
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 4:25 PM
To:	Ward, Linda; Mulligan, Amy; Minter, Tracy
Subject:	TW Allocations

When doing allocation process and we allocate points or groups on the Timely, Evening, or Non-Grid.
We allocate with the capacities that are loaded from CAS.  When allocating points or groups that have
not previously been allocated on any of the previous cycles during ID-1 or ID-2 we need to use the flow rate calculation.
.
Example :  Allocations are as follows

The only point to be exempt from this method should be Socal Needles because of their window issue
Timely:        M/L Thoreau West System                1093.000  (capacity)
                   I/B Link                                             700.000  (capacity)
                   Laplata/Ignacio                                  500.000  (capacity)
                   Socal Needles                                   775.000  (Window)
Evening:      Same sequence
Non-Grid:     Same sequence

ID-1or ID-2:  Same sequence shows up to be allocated.
                   Since they were previously allocated on the earlier cycles we do not need to right mouse
                   click and calculate flow and update capacity based on flow rate.  The only time we should
                   have to calculate flow rate is when there is a new point or group shows up that has not been previously
                   allocated.

 The reason for the change is we have recieved more FERC data requests on capacities and scheduled volumes.
lets try this for a while and see how it is working.


Attached for your redlining pleasure is a copy of the draft we
circulated at the end of today's meeting, with modifications suggested
following the meeting in Sections 1.2 and 4.1.3.

 - draft issues outline 061101.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/13/2000 01:56 PM
To: Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Entex weather hedge

Gary,

I don't think that we will be using a weather hedge this season.  The hedges
that we have used before have worked well because we have had very warm
winters and have correlated very well with Entex takes.  I am not as
confident in the correlation in a closer to normal temperature environment
which is the forecast for this winter.

Tom


It is OK to sign the copy I emailed to you.  Just return the signed copy  to
me via fax 713/646-3490 and I will get is signed by an authorized officer
here and return it to you.  In your fax please tell me who you would like me
to send the return fax to.  Thanks for your prompt attention with this!


Christian Yoder is looking for the course material for some of the in-house
derivatives seminars.  Does anyone have some material we can lend him?


Attached is the weekly report for your use and file.

Mark Lavine
Enron Transportation Services
Phn : 713-345-5588
Fax : 713-646-8032
mark.lavine@enron.com


Please set this up
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
01:59 PM ---------------------------

RTellis@milbank.com on 04/27/2000 06:50:58 PM
To: ddaniels@bracepatt.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com
cc: SHoward@milbank.com
Subject: Waste Management v. GSF

Richard and Doug: Pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court 212, counsel for all
parties are required to meet and confer to discuss the issues set forth below
no later than 30 days before a case management conference.? As you know, a
case management conference is scheduled for June 2, 2000.? Plaintiff's
counsel contacted me today and asked that we (along with counsel for GSF)
conduct the meet and confer via telephonic conference on Tue., May 2, 2000 at
4:00 p.m.

The issues to be discussed are as follows:

1)????? Service of all anticipated parties;
2)????? Related cases;
3) ???? Facts that are presently available to support the pleadings filed by
each party;
4)????? Injuries;
5)????? Damages;
6)????? Whether the amount in controversy will exceed $25,000;
7)????? Alternative dispute resolution, including mediation, arbitration;
8)????? Anticipated law and motion;
9)????? Preliminary schedules of discovery;
10)???? Possible settlement; and
11)???? Other relevant matters.

Although many of these issues are directed to a plaintiff, we too will need
to take positions on many of these items, particularly Nos. (3) & (7) -
(10).? We also need to better understand the nature of the dispute and our
strategy going forward.

I would like to set up a conference call for Monday, May 1, 2000 at 11:00
a.m. (PST) to discuss the foregoing.? Please let me know if this time is
convenient for you.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


See how this works.  Call my cell if you have any questions (303-898-7461)

Tyrell


OR
Well, which one is it?  You want to share some information with the rest of
Enron, but you don't know whether it belongs in the ThinkBank or in eMeet.
Here is a handy quiz to help you make the decision.  Answers appear just
below the quiz.
What kind of information do you want to share?
A.  A well-developed idea or suggestion for something that will affect
Enron's bottom line, either through revenue or savings.
B.  A question or a statement that you want someone else at Enron to answer
or discuss.
C.  None of the above.
D.  Both A and B.
If you chose "A," deposit an idea in the ThinkBank's Idea Vault.  If you
chose "B," eMeet is the place for you.  If you chose "C" or "D," send an
e-mail to ethink@enron.com and let us know what you're trying to share.
We'll help you find the right place for it in eThink.

Wednesday, Mar. 29 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Mark Koenig, executive vice
president of Enron Investor Relations.  Mark will answer questions about the
role of Investor Relations and also provide a stock update.  Remember, if you
can't make the live event, pre-submit your questions now on the eSpeak site.
Mark will be able to address them during his eSpeak, and you can see his
answers in the transcript after the event.

ethink.enron.com


Vail / Beaver Creek PEAKS Lift Ticket Pricing

December 22, 2001 - March 30, 2002
Adult Ticket Type	Lift Ticket Rate at Ticket Window	PEAKS lift ticket rate at the ticket window	14 day advance purchase rate	Buy now and you save
1 Day	$67	n/a	n/a	n/a
2 of 3 Days	$134	n/a	n/a	n/a
3 of 5 Days	$201	$189	$177	$24
4 of 6 Days	$268	$252	$236	$32
5 of 8 Days	$335	$315	$295	$40
6 of 9 Days	$402	$378	$354	$48
7 of 10 Days	$469	$441	$413	$56

 Must be purchased 14 days in advance  Rates subject to change

AS you may not be ski-ing everyday you can save money.  Which one do you want prebooking - I would suggest 4/6 or 5/8 as one day you will be snow mobiling (it doesn't start until 3pm)

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Have a wonderful day.  I'm gone to the Cadillac Bar for our Christmas
Luncheon.


We already have a deal in place.  #461059 with Torch-Rally.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
12/21/2000 11:42 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 986315 for 10/00

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000 11:41
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack @ ECT                           12/21/2000 11:32 AM

To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Meter 986315 for 10/00

Mary,
Cleco Energy has invoiced Charlene for 5,993 mmbtu for 10/00 production at
meter 986315.  There is no deal in place for this purchase.


Hello, I'm pretty flexible about food.  All of the things you mentioned sound good, so I can just eat the same stuff you guys do.  See ya in a few days!

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Maylynn Morales" <mmorales@arnel.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Saibi, Eric
Cc:	adnankkhan@hotmail.com
Subject:	food!!

Hi eric,
I just wanted to write and ask what type of foods you like to eat.  Especially breakfast foods.  I don't normally keep food in the house (and the food I do have is ancient and/or not that great - Ask Adnan!), so I wanted to know what you like so I can go grocery shopping and actually cook this weekend :-)
Are you a simple guy, or are you a bit complex?  I only have cereal, which is what I eat daily.  But I'm sure you have different tastes. Adnan likes to have his coffee w/ a pastry on weekdays and banana pancakes w/ eggs, fruit and bacon on weekends, so I have that taken care of, but I need to know what you like.
Another thing... We don't want you to worry about spending money on food.  You'll be well taken care of.  We won't let you go hungry.
Anyways... hope your excited...  :-)
Talk to you later,
Maylynn


Start Date: 12/17/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Toni:  I would like to extend an offer to Cynthia Lara.  I interviewed her
last week.  The offer should be $58,000/year.  If you have any questions just
let me know or contact Patti Sullivan @ x30494 or Bob Superty.  Thanks for
your help.


Gerald,

 I wanted to get you started on this ASAP as we discussed.  I don't expect a
finished product but
 preferr that you initiate the draft and I'll work with it as necessary in
you absence.  Thanks for you
 cooperation.

 I have attached a summary of the Parking Provision and the CSA in addition
to the Term Sheet
 that is dated but you get the idea.


I will ask Audrey to coordinate our calendars for marketing.  We will let you know.  Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:09 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Asante, Ben
Subject:	FW: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Kimberely, please let me know what date and time are good for you.
Thanks
Kim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Asante, Ben
Subject:	Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Confirming our conversation to meet next week to discuss the TW Deal Profitability/Analysis Model, I am free all week.  I would also like to invite Ben Asante too.
Thanks
Kim Kouri


Please ignor my previous mail regarding the same issue, which contains some
typos.

Greg and John,

I found that by reducing the volume per trade and increasing daily number of
trades ( keeping the
total volume per day constant), we can be more profitable.  This is partially
because in a trending market
we lose less money by following the market more closely. For example, suppose
market move from
$30 to $35. If per trade volume is 10,000 BBL and the half bid-offer spread
is $1 for simplicity, we take 5
 trades of short positions, the total MTM for that day is
(-5-4-3-2-1)*10,000=-$150,000 and total trading
volume is 50,000 BBL short.  If per trade volume is 50,000 BBL, we take one
trade, the total MTM is
-5*50,000= -$250,000.   Thus the net difference between the two trading
strategies is $10,000 for that
particular day.

Therefore it seems that by reducing per trade volume and increasing the
number of trades, we can be more
profitable as a market maker.

I rerun a scenario that Stinson sent to you on Dec. 27 where he used per
trade volume of 30,000 BBL.
I reduce the number of trade to 10,000 while increasing the number of trades
by factor of 3.  Almost in all
cases, I saw increased profitability.  See the colume marked "Change" for
dollar amount change in millions.

Please let Stinson or me know your thoughts on this.

Regards,

Zimin Lu

x36388

As compared to


I bid 110 for Trent Green and 5 for Richie Anderson.


The last thing was in ref to that email Tim sent back to you. I just spoke with Diana Scholtes regarding the updating. She has spent 2 hours working on the 6th and has run into numerous problems. There are some counterparties which have terminated with us that are still scheduled. She has talked to Will regarding this and he said it may be Monday before that can be corrected. The real time position manager and scheduling are very slow. They are using these to make sure they are flat. Bottom line is that this is a losing battle and Monday deadline doesn't look good.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 8:50 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Cc:	Reeves, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Liquidations

John - Not even the Dec #'s are done yet?  I believe they are planning on mass drafting Monday, so whatever is in the system at this time will go to Unify.  We might as well match Unify even if it is wrong, I guess.

Leslie - thoughts?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: Liquidations

even though scheduling may not be right, or even close? at least for the west.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey
Subject:	RE: Liquidations

The orig trading books can be set up at a later date.  It should be a while before we have any activity of that sort.  We ran financial liquidations because we have not had any additions to the financial terminations.  I am working on one more big set of counterparties who had auto-termination language in their master agreements.  I vote we catch up with all the information we have as of today and then run liquidations on Monday.  What do you guys think?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 10:40 AM
To:	Evans, Casey
Cc:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Liquidations

What is your status on liquidations? I noticed that you are looking at the fin liq report, etc. Are you running the Max Exp and liq rec even though the liquidations for Dec are not final?

Stacey, should we have also set up the Orig trading book? Should we have included that in the book requests?

John


Please respond to assignee.supportThis is the first of the two messages.

Dear Geoffrey

We are pleased to inform you that you are eligible for
PricewaterhouseCoopers' 2000 tax preparation services. This year you will
be able to provide us with your 2000 tax data information completely
on-line.

The site can be found at www.assignee.com.

Assignee.com is a secure site that uses advanced browser features and
requires that you use either Internet Explorer 4.0 or a higher version, or
Netscape Navigator 4.  Javascript, Cookies and SSL must be installed and
enabled.

Your User Name for accessing the site is: gstorey@enron.com .

For added security, your unique password will be sent to you separately.

If you have any questions, please do not reply to this e-mail directly.

Please contact the Support Center:

Toll free on:

1-888-673-4383 (if calling from the United States and Canada)

0800-0232959 (if calling from the Netherlands)

0800-900986 (if calling from France), and

If calling from countries other than above, please call: 1-973-236-5555

Fax: 1-973-236-5578

e-mail: assignee.support@us.pwcglobal.com

Alternatively, you can contact your local PwC Representative(s) :---

Wood, Judy
Calgary
403-509-7470
judy.l.wood@ca.pwcglobal.com


Will change

"Gencheva, Daniela" <GencheDI@er.oge.com> on 02/13/2001 11:06:52 AM
To: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc: "Liszewski, Pete" <liszewsp@er.oge.com>
Subject: Deal# 863626 from 2001-02-07

John,

During a telephone conversation with Pete Liszewski, at 2.12 pm on February
7th, you agreed that the price for deal#863626 - NYMEX nat gas swap for
15,000 Apr 01 should have been $5.815 NOT $5.83 as you system wrongfully
indicated.
Would you correct the price in your system or inform your contract
administrator of the correction.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact Pete Liszweski at
405-553-6430.

Daniela Gencheva
Energy Trading Analyst II
OGE Energy Resources
TEL: 405-553-6486
FAX: 405-553-6498


http://jonesgsm.rice.edu/
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
04:59 PM ---------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 03/22/2001 04:46:53 PM
To: ostdiek@rice.edu
cc:
Subject: RICE/ENRON FINANCE SEMINAR SERIES

A copy of Paul Schultz's paper, "Who Makes the Market," is now
available.  The paper to can be obtained (by Monday for sure) from Felicia
Jones (Economics), Latha Ramchand (University of Houston), and Vince
Kaminski (Enron) or Barbara Ostdiek (everyone else).

Paul's seminar is Friday, March 30, at 3:30 in Room 201 (note the room
change).

The abstract of the paper is copied below:

Abstract

"I provide evidence that Nasdaq dealers make markets in the stocks in which
they receive order flow.  Several variables used to proxy for the stocks
that individual market maker's brokerage customers would trade, including
trading volume, location, underwriting participation and analyst coverage,
are significant determinants of market marking activity.  Informational
advantages may also be a factor in the market making decision as evidenced
by dealers specializing in stocks in specific industries.  Some potential
problems that arise when researchers ignore the integration of market
making with brokerage, securities analysis and underwriting businesses are
discussed."


********* Welcome to Bestfares.com's HOT DEALS BY EMAIL ************

BESTFARES.COM is your source for HOT TRAVEL DEALS. Visit our home
page at http://www.bestfares.com. Also, remember to visit our Newsdesk
daily at http://www.bestfares.com/travel_center/desks/newsdesk.asp
where we post hundreds of deals every day that could save you up
to 70% every time you travel! Subscribe and unsubscribe information
can be found at the bottom of this newsletter.

**************************** November 7, 2000  ************************

FLY TO FLORIDA THIS HOLIDAY SEASON FROM $128 RT.
Just in time to gear up for holiday travel, we have new low fares to
Florida valid for flights beginning December 20 through January 9, 2001.
If you didn,t buy the cheap Florida fares we offered in August and
September, then you may now be experiencing the airfare ticket shock we
warned you about back then. The major airlines are now claiming to offer
discount fares through February 4, but their cheapest seats for travel
between December 20 through January 9, 2001 are already gone. The good
news is that we still have seats available to the sunny state of Florida
for as low as $128 roundtrip. Even though the published fares have no
cheap seats remaining, we have a way to get you there for less if you act
quickly. For instance, Dayton (OH) to Florida through Bestfares.com is
only $128 roundtrip. Most of our special fares are between $180 and $258
roundtrip.  For a sample of our inexpensive &Frugal Fares to Get You To
Florida,8 visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105768

HAWAII ON SALE FOR THE HOLIDAYS THROUGH FEBRUARY 15, 2001.
Yes, we have an assortment of excellent Hawaiian fares, but we want to be
upfront about availability. Certain cheap seats to Honolulu will be tight
between December 20 and 29, 2000, so act fast because we are currently
finding cheap fares to Kona and, on select holiday dates, to Maui. For
example, you can head to Maui or Kona from $395 roundtrip. Or how about
San Diego, Phoenix, Seattle, Portland (OR), Los Angeles or San Francisco
to Honolulu for an even lower $345 roundtrip? Fly from Dallas/Fort Worth,
Chicago, Milwaukee, Minneapolis or Houston to Hawaii for $428 roundtrip.
From New York City, Boston, Washington (DC), Orlando or Miami, it,s $502
roundtrip. Check out our special fares to Hawaii. Travel is valid through
February 15, 2001. Be flexible and you can save a bundle. Click to:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10085830

FLY TO THE CARIBBEAN FROM $180 RT THROUGH MARCH 14, 2001.
We have some excellent cruise prices out of San Juan, Puerto Rico at the
moment. Combine this with our inexpensive airfare to San Juan as low as
$180 roundtrip through March 14, 2001, and you now have a double whammy
for a super Caribbean getaway! We have a great variety for you. For
instance, roundtrip airfare from New York City is $180, from Fort
Lauderdale $200, Orlando $246, Boston $252 and Chicago $286. Fly from
Denver, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle or Las Vegas to San
Juan for $414 roundtrip. These airfares can be up to 50 percent off.
Travel between December 18 and January 8, 2001 is sold out. For further
information, visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10088489

SENIORS AND COMPANIONS COAST-TO-COAST FOR $248 RT OR LESS.
This week, some of the best deals in America are for seniors age 62 and
over. One of the greatest things about senior discounts is that they allow
a companion of any age to travel along at the same low price. Plus, the
good news keeps getting better when you discover there are only 10
blackout dates on these amazing airfares: November 21, 25, 26 & 27 and
December 20, 21, 22, 23, 26 & 27. That,s it! If you can fly around those
dates, there is a good chance you could save a bundle. Here are some
examples. Fly from San Diego, Orange County, Ontario (CA), San Francisco,
Seattle, Portland (OR) or Las Vegas to Boston, New York City, Washington
(DC), Orlando, Tampa, Fort Lauderdale or more for only $238 roundtrip.
Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio, New Orleans, Little Rock, Oklahoma
City or Tulsa to Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, Washington (DC) or
Norfolk is just $142 roundtrip. Take a look at our &Seniors Fly for Less
Across the USA8 specials. This is a great time to buy the parents or
grandparents a great holiday gift of airfare. Click to:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10019294

HOLIDAY FARES TO CANADA FROM $60 RT THROUGH JANUARY 7, 2001.
If you want to fly to Canada during Thanksgiving or the late December
holidays, we have airfares as low as $60 to the Great White North. Now
that,s something to shout about. From Seattle to Vancouver, you can fly
for $60 roundtrip. From Portland (OR), it,s $93 roundtrip. San Francisco
to Vancouver is $112 roundtrip. Cleveland, Detroit or Pittsburgh to
Toronto is only $85 roundtrip. Hartford to Montreal is also $85 roundtrip.
From Boston or Providence, it,s $100 roundtrip. Newark to Montreal is $91
roundtrip. If you want an inexpensive holiday excursion, then consider
Canada for a great getaway. The American dollar is quite strong now, room
rates are low, and of course, we have super cheap Canadian airfares from
over 40 US cities. To take advantage of the savings, visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10044703

EUROFARE IS BACK! HOPSCOTCH EUROPE FOR ONLY $89 PER FLIGHT
If you want to see city after city in Europe on a cheap buck there is only
one word to say and it,s &Eurofare.8  Imagine flying from Paris to Rome
for $89 or how about London to Amsterdam for that same incredibly low
rate?  All you have to do is purchase a round-trip transatlantic ticket on
Lufthansa or United Airlines from the USA to Europe and then you can
travel to more than 100 cities in 35 countries within Europe for only $89
per flight.  That,s right, Lufthansa Airlines, Eurofare is back and it,s
taking you on a ride to your favorite European cities for only $89 per
flight!

One-way fares from Frankfurt to Rome are as high as $871 and Munich to
Paris currently sells for $345 on a major European Airline. At $89 per
flight for the same cities Eurofare is a great bargain! To qualify book a
roundtrip airline ticket on Lufthansa or United Airlines now through March
30, 2001 and you can add up to six additional flights within Europe for
only $89 per flight.  Your originating transatlantic flight must depart by
March 31, 2001 and your roundtrip travel must be completed by April 7,
2001.

Some restrictions and blackouts apply so you may want to read our full
story by visiting: http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105980 or visit
Lufthansa,s web site at:
http://www.lufthansa-usa.com/bf_efe_oc00.html.

EUROPEAN CAR RENTALS STARTING AS LOW AS $14 A DAY
Our car rental partner, Auto Europe, is having a great year-end sale for
rentals booked online before December 15, 2000. During this sale you can
expect to shave up to 20% off their already low standard rates for car
rentals through end of next year (12/30/01)!  And, Auto Europe is
sweetening the deal by also throwing in a free one-week cellular phone
rental during this sale. For example, below are some of Auto Europe,s low
standard rates and if you book online during this sale you can save up to
20% more:

3-day rental in Paris - $60 (That,s only $20 a day!)
3-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $79 ($26 a day!)
7-day rental in Paris - $100 (That,s only $14 a day!)
7-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $132 ($19 a day!)

With savings like these on car rentals and airfares, there,s no reason why
you shouldn,t book a wonderful European vacation today. For complete
details click to our Newsdesk story at:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105981. Or, book your European
rental car by visiting Auto Europe,s web site at
http://www.autoeurope.com/welcome.cfm?c=15.

********************************************************************

HOT DEALS BY EMAIL announcements feature special money-saving offers
available on Bestfares.com. This free, weekly newsletter is your
best bet to receive great, late-breaking travel deals.

Please feel free to send this newsletter to your colleagues, friends
and family and encourage them to sign up for a free subscription to
HOT DEALS BY EMAIL. Thanks to all of you who have already recommended
this newsletter to others. If this email has been forwarded to you,
you can get your own free subscription at:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

About your privacy: Our email list is used only for distribution of
our own materials. Our subscriber list will not be sold, rented, or
otherwise made available to third parties

********************************************************************

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

To subscribe to the HOT DEALS BY EMAIL newsletter, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

To unsubscribe from HOT DEALS BY EMAIL, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp

To change your email address, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp
and unsubscribe from Hot Deals. Then go to:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp
and register your new email address.

Although every effort is made to ensure accurate information,
Bestfares.com is not responsible for any errors in this newsletter.


Thanks for the offer Ms Kupiecki, but since you carried so much of the weight
last case, I feel obliged to compile this time round.


Be sure and take the test.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peggy Dan Maynard" <peggy@airmail.net>
To: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:52 PM
Subject: Fw: Voter Competency Test

> Hope you are doing okay. I have many skin cancers because I had xray
> treatments when a teen ager. We did miss you in  Austin.  By the way...
hope
> you pass the test!!  love YOU
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark_Maynard@Dell.com <Mark_Maynard@Dell.com>
> To: peggy@airmail.net <peggy@airmail.net>
> Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 11:35 AM
> Subject: FW: Voter Competency Test
>
>
> >This is a website that has a joke test.  You should be able to go to it
by
> >clicking the address below:
> >
> >> http://fly.hiwaay.net/~mtspeer/index.html
>


Ningya,

I shall talk to Beth Perlman about the transfers.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ningya Cheng                           03/14/2000 09:19 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Information about our IT group

Hi, Vince and Zimin
 Our group has some major change.  Our director, Tom Moore, will move to
London starting May 1.
 In this changing  environment, it might be good for transferring  to happen.
 If I got your permission, I can talk to IT people directly.

Regards

Ningya
(3-5248)


Wednesday at 2:30 or Thursday am works for me also.  sjk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	January, Steven
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	McGowan, Mike W.; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: SLA Settlement

Of course I'm happy to serve. The best for me would be Wednesday afternoon beginning at 2 or 2:30. I will already be in Omaha. I could also do it Thursday morning early---I have to leave by 10:00 a.m. Lynn is out of town until next Wednesday, but  I'm sure she will be checking her e:mails. thanks. sj

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McGowan, Mike W.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:45 PM
To:	January, Steven; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Kirk, Steve
Subject:	SLA Settlement

As you are aware,  NNG has reached a settlement with the shippers in the SLA proceeding.  Part of the settlement provides that NNG and its shippers will work together in good faith to develop an imbalance resolution which includes a shipper option of in-kind balancing or cash out.  Also, the working group would define the parameters around which NNG could buy or sell gas into or out of the operational storage account.  Mary Kay has asked that Steve Kirk & myself co-chair this committee for NNG and that the two of you also be members of the committee on behalf of NNG.  I assume you are OK with this assignment.

We would like to get together and discuss our general approach to this effort.  Steve and I think our initial meeting could be held in the Video Conference room.    Could you let me know your availability to get together sometime next week for appr 1 -1/12 hours?

I will then try to coordinate a meeting of the group and probably include Mary Kay and possibly Dave Neubauer.

Let me know.

Thanks!

Mike McGowan


Guess the pressure worked!  This was sent to Tom by legal.  thought you should get a copy too.

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	'tgoudie@hesco.org'
Cc:	Ward, Kim S (Houston); McCullough, Travis; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Draft Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

Mr. Goudie;

Per the request of Kim Ward, attached please find the above-referenced agreement.  Please call me with any questions or comments.

Stacy Dickson Granmayeh
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3879
Houston, Texas  77002

Phone (713) 853-5705
Fax (713) 646-3490
Stacy.E.Dickson@enron.com


Dan/Doug:

Please advise as soon as possible if both of you will be in the office later
in the week this week, and the first part of next week, to review the
Consents (for Dan), and execution on behalf of EPOS (for Doug).

Thanks.

Larry Pardue
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Caribbean -- Legal Department
333 Clay Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas
U.S.A.
Tel   +713 345 52 40
Fax   +713 646 60 58
email:  larry.pardue@enron.com


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042820.txt


Greg Piper would be your contact.  You can reach Greg at 713-853-6161.

Thanks,
Joannie

"Lynne Witt" <lwitt@netbotz.com> on 03/18/2001 03:29:39 PM
To: <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE quote eCompany

Mr. Skilling,

I was compelled to contact you by the following information:
While reading eCompany Magazine March Issue, I came across the following
quote from Jeff Skilling CEO of Enron.

"Keeping the system up. You dread the chance the system will crash. We had
an air conditioning problem last April or May, and went down.
The next day the front page of Gas Daily Journal had a story that said "Gas
trading stops because Enron online is down.""

Netbotz offers early warning to just that type of failure and more.
http://www.netbotz.com

Mr. Skilling who would I contact at Enron to make them aware of a product
with a sub $1000. price tag to prevent those issues in the future?

Lynne Witt
Inside Sales Manager
NetBotz, Inc.
Phone 512-439-5825
Fax 512-439-5801
www.netbotz.com


Jim,

We have an immigration issue related to certain employees of a JV in Guam.  We would like to utilize the firm of Jenkens & Gilchrist to sort through the issue.

Please advise whether this firm is approved.

Regards,

Timothy J. Callahan
Director, Global Employee Services
Enron Corp
333 Clay Street, Suite 1047
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone:  713.646.9565
Fax:  713.646.9501


Thanks to all for helping to evaluate and come to an agreement on this project. Maybe sometime later we'll get another chance to look at it .
RJ
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:49 PM
To:	Jolly, Rich; Roensch, David; Watson, Kimberly; Chanley, Earl; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Matthews, Ron; Geaccone, Tracy; wjdudley@nalcoexxon.com; tlsweeney@nalcoexxon.com; Graves, Jerry; Asante, Ben; Choquette, Gary; Kouri, Kim
Cc:	Rice, Randy; Harris, Steven; Spalding, Norm; January, Steve; Keller, John R.; Gottsponer, Morgan; Pribble, Dan
Subject:	La Plata to Bloomfield Drag Reducing Agent Application Evaluation - No Go

The economic evaluation of applying drag reducing agent to the La Plata to Bloomfield line indicates it is not justified.  Tracy indicated that if the launchers and receivers were installed as a part of the pipeline integrity program, the incremental cost of DRA application may then be economically beneficial.

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this effort.

John


Please see the attached letter to Feinstein.


Mark,

Here are some descriptions which will be helpful on the Determination Period
issue which London Global Products have.

Thanks,

Dave


can you find out if the tech group has scheduled installation of a dsl line
in my apartment?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Buerkle, Jim
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 10:45 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject:	Shasta Lake Notification

Diana and Sean,

We have agreed to send Shasta Lake daily e-mail notification with strike price information when we exercise the transmission option.  Here is Jerry Cupp's email address.  Please cc me on the notices.

Thanks,

Jim

gerry.cupp@ci.shasta-lake.ca.us

Jim Buerkle
Manager
Middle Market
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon St. 3WTC 0306
Portland, OR 97204

(503) 464-3832 (Office)
(503) 702-4604 (Mobile)
(503) 464-3740 (Fax)
jim.buerkle@enron.com


FYI see attached

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
06:11 PM ---------------------------

edward kao <EKao@UH.EDU> on 02/03/2000 08:17:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your talk on 2/7/00 (Monday)

Dear Vince:

      I would like to send out an annoucement about your talk in my Risk
Management in the Energy Sector course on February 7, Monday.  Is it
correct that the name of your talk will be "Commodity Trading in the
Energy Sector".  You indicated that you would be using transparencies so
we have a projector ready for you.  Please let me know if there is
anything else you need for the talk.  Please also confirm this at your
earliest convenience so that I can get announcement sent out soon.  Thanks
in advance for the talk.  We all look forward to meeting you Monday.
Best regards,  Ed
PS.  The class meet 7:00-8:20 pm at 117 Meclcher Hall. As we originally
planned, I will be waiting in my office from 6:30-6:50 and greet you at
the parking lot IE.


[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   Special* FREE 1/2lb of our  Guatemalan "Acatanango" with any $25 purchase  Ultimate in Freshness! The secret to a great cup of coffee is to always start with the  freshest roasted coffee available. We roast our coffee after you  place your order and ship it FREE to you the same day.  Roasted & Shipped the Same Day You Order!   CLICK  HERE!


Neither ENA/RAC/EGF employees nor family members or others living in their
household or financially dependent on the ENA/RAC/EGF employee may purchase
or sell securities of any entity (or derivatives thereof) listed on the
Restricted List for your or their personal or related accounts or recommend
the purchase or sale of such securities to any person, except with the prior
approval of the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal
Department.

In addition to the trading restrictions above, should you at any time possess
non-public material information about any public company, you, your family
members and anybody that is financially dependent on you, are restricted from
trading in that issue, and you may not disclose the non-public material
information to anyone that does not have a business need to know.

Company Name Stock Symbol

Adrian Resources
Beau Canada Exploration Ltd BAU CN
Belco Oil & Gas Corporation BOG
Bonus Resource Services Corp BOU
Brigham Exploration BEXP
CanFibre Group Ltd. CFGL
Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. CRZO
Costilla Energy COSE
Crown Energy CROE
Cypress Energy CYZ
Esenjay Exploration ESNJ
Hanover Compressor Co. HC
ICE Drilling Enterprises Inc. IDF
Industrial Holdings, Inc. IHII
Inland Resources, Inc. INLN
Kafus Environmental Industries, Inc. KS
Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co Ltd NSM SET
Paladin Resources PLC PLR LD
Paradigm Geophysical PGEOF
Place Resources, Inc. PLG CN
Quanta Services Inc. PWR
Queen Sand Resources, Inc. QSRI
Quicksilver Resources Inc. KWK
Repap Enterprises, Inc. RPP & RPAPF
Repap New Brunswick, Inc.
Rhythms Netconnection Inc. RTHM
Saxon Petroleum, Inc. SXN CN
Startech SEH CN
Syntroleum Corp. SYNM
Tejon Ranch Corp. TRC
Titan Exploration TEXP
TransCoastal Marine Services, Inc. TCMS
Zargon Oil & Gas ZAR CN

The Restricted List is solely for the internal use of ENA/RAC/EGF.  No one
may engage in discussions regarding whether a security is or is not on the
Restricted List with persons outside ENA/RAC/EGF without specific clearance
from the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal Department.

In addition to the above, you are reminded that pursuant to Enron Corp.'s
Risk Management Policy ("Policy"), no ENA/RAC/EGF employee may engage in the
trading of any "Position"  ("Position" means any  commodity, financial
instrument, security, equity, financial asset or liability that are
authorized for trading in the Policy for the benefit of any party other than
ENA/RAC/EGF, whether for his/her own account or the account of any third
party, where such Position relates to (i) any commodity,  financial
instrument, security, equity, financial asset or liability which falls within
such employee's responsibility at ENA/RAC/EGF or (ii) any energy commodity.

The prohibitions listed above do not replace or modify the policies set forth
in ENA's Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and
Securities Trading, Enron Corp.'s Risk Management Policy, or Enron Corp.'s
Conduct of Business Affairs.  Should you have any questions regarding the
above, please contact me at ext. 31939.


<<HBTX01_.doc>> I would like to file this as soon as possible, but would
appreciate your taking a look at it to make sure we captured all the
changes.  Thanks.

 - HBTX01_.doc


We need to all talk Tuesday morning ASAP - I am frankly sick and  tired of
self-delusion in the face of a stark and bleak reality in Sacramento- As a
Democrat, it is clear to me that the Democrats from Gray on down are a lost
cause( their response, from a public policy perspective, is shameful in its
shortsidedness and contemptible in its lack of thoughtfulness and intellect-
the Democrat's response in Cal. makes me ashamed to call myself a Democrat)
and the Republicans too small a minority in Ca. to make a difference- From my
vantage point ,nothing good and some( potentially much) bad came out of the
three bills passed. We have a huge uphill battle coming in the next session
and the prospects of further thoughtless retrenchment on the part of the
Governor and legislature very high- to begin the preperation for that
struggle,  we first have to be honest with ourselves and end any petty
bickering internally on intrepretations of brutally clear  events and
oucomes, events and outcomes which are the equivalent of getting hit upside
the head by a 2 by  4, i.e; that usually does'nt require intrepretation or
discussion as to whether it hurt... We end the self-delusion starting on
Tuesday. Jeff- please arrange the call - all are invited .

Sandra McCubbin
09/02/2000 01:44 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Dave Parquet, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Possible Messages on Legislation in California

since the siting legislation created only a program that is voluntary and not
in place of the existing laws, and we have a committment from the
legislature, the CEC and the govenor's office to take another shot in
January, as they know that this legislation is flawed, too many conflicting
interests trying to solve a complex problem in too short a time, I feel this
is too harsh...we have already started the process of creating new
legislation, that will be as close to a consensus as possible for next
session..this legislation did not hurt us, and, some companies feel that they
can use the processes.  We have to keep in mind that with the knowledge that
there will be major reorganization legislation next year, we don't want to
offend the friends that we have in Sacramento, particularly the Republicans
who were the ones who insisted on an expedited siting bill


two questions:
1) are we having a staff meeting tomorrow?
2) why the heck aren't you in the bonus meeting?


Forwarded from Bob Julian, Consultant to the Padres and Burnham.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O Yambrach/HOU/EES on 10/20/99
08:48 AM ---------------------------

"Bob Julian" <rjulian@ppgpower.com> on 10/19/99 06:16:10 PM

To:	Michael O Yambrach/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	"Jim Chatfield" <chatfield@burnhamrealestate.com>

Subject:	District cooling regulation

Mike:
Regarding your question about regulatory oversight of chilled water services
by the CPUC in San Diego, my information indicates that the CPUC does not
regulate the existing chilled water services in San Diego.  Also, to confirm
our conversation, San Diego Power & Cooling is operating under what we
understand is a non-exclusive franchise agreement with the City of San Diego.

I'll have an answer for you shortly on the "common facilities" question you
posed.

Bob Julian
Power Procurement Group

 - att1.htm


Hey Chris,

I have not reconciled the difference, but can make it a priority if I need to.  Let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:40 AM
To:	Wynne, Rita
Subject:	FW: Bridgeline Storage & Transport

Rita FYI - I told Ed that I would go with Bridgeline's number because
1.  it is more conservative
2.  the difference is small
3.  that some trader may not have put in a deal or volume management didn't path the deals correctly....anything is possible with the turnover we have had.

If you have reconciled the numbers and know where the difference is let me know.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:29 AM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Bridgeline Storage & Transport

Stuart,
Chris recommends that we go with Bridgeline's number, as it is much more likely to be accurate at this point.  If Rita Wynne has time and it does not delay your efforts, you could have her attempt to reconcile the balance.
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:03 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Bridgeline Storage & Transport

Per Anita Patton at Bridgeline - the balance is 1,930,552 dth.  Per Rita Wynne - ENA is showing a balance of 1,986,972 dth.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 7:31 PM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	RE: Bridgeline Storage & Transport

Thanks for the information.  The lady that I wanted to attend was out today.  Sorry for the head fake - my bad.  I am giving issue iv to Chris Germany to resolve.  The direction is good with me.  Thanks for your leadership on this one.
Regards,
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 11:12 AM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Sharp, Greg; Hoff, Jonathan; Concannon, Ruth
Subject:	Bridgeline Storage & Transport

Ed,

The person that you mentioned this morning failed to make it to our meeting .  Not a big deal but, as a result, I want to catch you up with where things are.

We established that:
(i) it is going to be very difficult to determine a fair market value for the put option;
(ii) Greg Sharp is going to speak with McConnell this morning about obtaining the necessary support for buying the option;
(iii) Greg is going to determine all amounts currently owed (and past due) from Bridgeline to ENA;
(iv) we need you to help us confirm the amount of gas in storage (Hugh Connett suggested that their numbers show about 1.93 BCF);
(v) I am going to circle up with PWC and Blackstone (after hearing back from Greg) to talk about the deal and get their reactions; and
(vi) I am going to speak with Bridgeline on a preliminary basis about some of the deal terms (in particular (a) the option price, (b) doing the gas sale earlier and escrowing the proceeds, (c) mitigation of damages and how that mitigation should affect the amounts (both pre and post-petition) that are owed by ENA to Bridgeline and (d) increasing the amount payable for the gas in storage (because this deal is distinguishable from the pad gas sale in that we will be paying for the transport to move it)).

Let's visit on this when you get a moment.  Also please help me with item (iv) above.  Finally, I need you to tell me if you are OK with how this thing is shaping up.

Stuart


[IMAGE]
 Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer!  Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.  http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi   Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News  now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]'); [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Jeff Graham , WR SD - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Graham has been quiet recently, but may bust out of a mini-slump against the Cardinals. His yardage numbers should be respectable, and he may catch a TD pass.  Jerome Bettis , RB PIT - El-Gato Updated 11/21/01 The loss of tight end Mark Bruener could have an adverse impact on Bettis' output over the final weeks of the season, but you still need to start him every week in your league. Bettis is likely to struggle against a de! ce! nt Titans rush defense on Sunday, but he'll still give you serviceable stats and may even find the end zone.  Curtis Conway , WR SD - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Expect a big game from Conway in Week 11. The Arizona pass defense has been very soft all year long.  Kordell Stewart , QB PIT - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 While the Steelers' passing game has improved in recent weeks, Stewart is still far too inconsistent to merit using on a weekly basis. He faces a weak Tennessee secondary on Sunday, which is a good matchup, but only use him if you're desperate for a starter in your league.  Darrell Jackson , WR SEA - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Jackson should play very well at Kansas City this week. Seattle will use their passing game early on to open up running lanes for Shaun Alexander, and Jackson will be a key receiver for Matt Hasselbeck.  Tim Brown , WR OAK - Tacos Updated 11/21/01 Raiders QB Rich Gannon should have plenty of time to locate Brown downfield in their game against the Giants on Sunday. Definitely get Brown into your active lineup this week.  Charlie Garner , RB OAK - Perrito-style Updated 11/21/01 Don't expect Garner to put up good stats against the Giants on Sunday. Tyrone Wheatley has returned from an injury and New York is tough on the run. Only use Garner if you don't have another alternative on your roster.  David Patten , WR NE - R-Diddy Updated 11/21/01 Patten and the Patriots go up against the Saints on Sunday. While he has been inconsistent all year long, this is a favorable matchup for the wideout. Patten could beat Fred Thomas downfield for a score, and you should consider using him as your No. 2 or 3 receiver.  Troy Brown , WR NE - God Updated 11/21/01 Brown has been a very reliable receiver for his owners this season, and has only gotten better since Tom Brady has been throwing him the ball. Expect another solid week for Brown against a mediocre Saints secondary.  Antowain Smith , RB NE - Starboy Updated 11/21/01 Smith has been a pleasant surprise for his Fantasy owners this season. He'll go up against a subpar Saints rush defense on Sunday, and we recommend you get him into your active lineup as a result.  Oronde Gadsden , WR MIA - Starboy Updated 11/21/01 Gadsden has been very inconsistent this season, and we don't recommend you use him this week against the Bills. Let him prove himself before you consider putting him back into your active lineup the remainder of the season.  James McKnight , WR MIA - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 ! There is a possibility McKnight could beat the Bills downfield for a few long passes on Sunday. However, he is only worth using in very deep leagues.  Travis Minor , RB MIA - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 The Dolphins may use Minor a fair amount Sunday against Buffalo to keep the defense honest. He could be worth using in a deep league since the Bills have been weak against the run all season.  Tony Gonzalez , TE KC - Beegs Boys Updated 11/21/01 Gonzalez will rack up good Fantasy stats Sunday against the Seahawks. While he has been somewh! at! of a disappointment, you need to keep him active every week.  Stephen Davis , RB WAS - Oper Error Updated 11/21/01 Davis rushed for 84 yards against Denver last week, and was held out of the end zone once again. He may struggle against Philadelphia in Week 11, but you may have no choice but to start him considering the lack of running back depth around the league.   Larry Parker , WR KC - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Parker could get a touchdown pass Sunday against Seattle, as the Seahawks' secondary has regularly been burned by teams' second wideout options. He might make a good No. 3 receiver for this week.  Tony Richardson , RB KC - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Richardson has fallen into a goal-line back role in recent games, and there's a chance he'll get a score against the Seahawks on Sunday. Kansas City should move the ball with relative ease, and if you are in a deep league or a touchdown-only league, he might be worth putting in your lineup.  Priest Holmes , RB KC - R-Diddy Updated 11/21/01The Chiefs will use many plays to keep the Seahawks off balance on Sunday, which should help Holmes roll up some very good stats this week. We recommend you get him into your active lineup despite his struggles against the Jets in Week Nine.  Trent Green , QB KC - Starboy Updated 11/21/01 Green and the Chiefs slumped badly before their bye week, but should rebound Sunday against Seattle. Expect him to post decent stats against this questionable secondary, but don't rush to start him over a less mistake-prone quarterback.  Stephen Alexander , TE WAS - Perrito! -s! tyle Updated 11/21/01 According to the Washington Post, Alexander will be back in the starting lineup on Sunday against Philadelphia. He had been inconsistent prior to suffering an ankle injury, so starting him is somewhat of a gamble.   Kyle Brady , TE JAC - El-Gato Updated 11/21/01 Brady hasn't offered useful Fantasy stats much this season. We don't recommend you use him this week against the Ravens, as it is unlikely this is the game he will break his slump.  Rod Gardner , WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Gardner has been held down in three consecutive weeks, and is having some trouble holding onto the ball recently. He'll face a tough Philadelphia secondary on Sunday, making him a risky start from a Fantasy perspective.   Keenan McCardell , WR JAC - Beegs Boys Updated 11/21/01 McCardell matches up with Duane Starks in Sunday's game against Baltimore, and that, combined with the possibility of Jonathan Quinn starting at quarterback, makes him a risky start. McCardell has the talent to beat Starks for a few good catches, but you shouldn't be counting on him for explosive stats.  Jimmy ! Sm! ith  , WR JAC - R-Diddy Updated 11/21/01 Despite Jonathan Quinn likely playing his second straight game, you have to keep a guy like Smith active in any week in your league. He might have less impressive stats, but Smith is still talented enough to catch more passes than most receivers in the league.  Elvis Joseph , RB JAC - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 There's a chance Joseph could break off some long runs despite his facing the Ravens' defense on Sunday. However, we only recommend you use him this week if you have no other options at running back.  M! arcus Pollard , TE IND - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Pollard will have his hands full trying to escape San Francisco's Lance Schulters on Sunday. While Pollard has been a very reliable Fantasy tight end in recent weeks, you shouldn't expect great stats this week. However, you should probably start him unless you have a good alternative.  Terrence Wilkins , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 11/21/01 Wilkins is likely to start in place of the injured Reggie Wayne Sunday against San Francisco. While Wilkins could get some passes thrown his way and post decent stats against a so-so Niners secondary, we only recommend you use him if you have no other options at wide receiver. Marvin Harrison , WR IND - Perrito-style Updated 11/21/01 Harrison is a must-start in any Fantasy league regardless of opponent. However, he should have no problem beating San Francisco CB Ahmed Plummer downfield for great stats this week.  Dominic Rhodes , RB IND - Beegs Boys Updated 11/21/01 Rhodes has a good matchup in Indianapolis on Sunday, and you should definitely start him this week. He may not post Edgerrin James-like stats, but should give good rushing totals and a score.  Desmond Clark , TE DEN - Oper Error Updated 11/21/01 Clark has been getting more passes thrown his way than Dwayne Carswell in recent weeks, and he will be a key member of the Broncos' passing game Thursday against Dallas. While the Cowboys will likely be ready to defend these two tight ends, if you need to start one it should definitely be Clark.  More Updates  NFL Reports, Transactions  [IMAGE]'); [IMAGE] 11/23 New York Jets  Promoted tight end Daniel Wilcox  to the active roster; added defensive end Riley Kleinhesselink to the practice squad.   Chicago Rush (Arena) Signed wide receiver-defensive back Marvin Taylor, wide receiver-linebacker Lindsay Fleshman and lineman Mike Love.   Grand Rapids Rampage (Arena) Signed lineman Corey Mayfield to a one-year contract.   Indiana Firebirds (Arena) Re-signed wide receiver-defensive back Mike Leaks.   New Jersey Gladiators (Arena) Re-signed defensive specialist Lee Wiggins.   Orlando Predators (Arena) Placed lineman B.J. Cohen on recallable waivers; released wide receiver-defensive back Bret Cooper.   arenafootball 2 Announced that the Iowa Barnstormers will not field a team in the 2002 season due to construction-related issues.    11/22 Montreal Alouettes (CFL) Named Don Matthews coach.    11/21 Dallas Cowboys  Placed linebacker Louis Mackey on injured reserve; signed linebacker Keith Adams to the active roster.   Indianapolis Colts  Placed running back Edgerrin James  and wide receiver Jerome Pathon  on injured reserve; waived quarterback Roderick Robinson ; signed fullback Wes Ours , defensive end Lionel Barnes and wide receiver Tony Simmons .   Kansas City Chiefs  Signed wide receiver J.J. Moses  to the practice squad.   Arena Football League Announced the league has purchased the rights to the Florida Bobcats, Milwaukee Mustangs, Houston ThunderBears  and Oklahoma Wranglers and will eliminate all four teams for the 2002 season.   Dallas Desperados (Arena) Named Tom Luginbill offensive coordinator.    11/20 Atlanta Falcons  Waived cornerback Conrad Hamilton; signed cornerback Elijah Williams.   Calgary Flames Assigned forward Jukka Hentunen to Saint John of the American Hockey League.  Carolina Panthers  Signed defensive end Gillis Wilson; placed defensive end John Milem on injured reserve; released linebacker Jeff Posey.   Cincinnati Bengals  Signed tight end Joshua Kerr and offensive lineman Ray Redziniak to the practice squad.   Detroit Lions  Placed safety Ron Rice on injured reserve with  a neck and back injury.  Miami Dolphins  Signed guard Anthony Cesario to the practice squad; released running back Vaughn Sanders  from the practice squad.   Philadelphia Eagles  Signed linebacker Dax Strohmeyer to the practice squad.   Pensacola Barracudas (arenafootball2) Named Mike Buck coach and director of football operations.    11/19 Detroit Lions  Placed linebacker Stephen Boyd on injured reserve with a bad back; signed running back Aveion Cason .   Green Bay Packers  Placed safety LeRoy Butler on injured reserve with a broken shoulder blade; waived kicker James Tuthill ; signed safety Billy Jenkins; re-signed cornerback Keith Thibodeaux.   Philadelphia Eagles  Waived safety Terrence Carroll; signed running back Rod Smart  from the practice squad.    Transactions, View  [IMAGE]'); [IMAGE]Transactions Date Time Player Team Transaction Effective Cost!  11/21/01 9:43 AM Price, Peerless Kar Bombs Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Pinkston, Todd Kar Bombs Released Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Bradford, Corey Kar Bombs Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Pathon, Jerome Kar Bombs Released Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Browns God Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Bills God Released Week 11    Schedule, Breakdown  [IMAGE]'); [IMAGE] G money Player Pos Points Griese, Brian  QB 10.0 Barlow, Kevan  RB 0.0 Centers, Larry  RB 0.0 Scott, Darnay  WR 0.0 Smith, Rod  WR 8.0 Crumpler, Alge  TE 0.0 Gramatica, Martin  K 0.0 Seahawks  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   18.0   [IMAGE] Redmond, J.R.  RB 0.0 Chiefs  DT 0.0 Alexander, Derrick  WR 0.0 Brunell, Mark  QB 0.0 Davis, Terrell  RB 0.0 Hollis, Mike  K 0.0 Kinney, Erron  TE 0.0 Muhammad, Muhsin  WR 0.0   [IMAGE] at God Player Pos Points Garcia, Jeff  QB 0.0 Alexander, Shaun  RB 0.0 Smith, Lamar  RB 0.0 Ismail, Qadry  WR 0.0 Owens, Terrell  WR 0.0 Walls, Wesley  TE 0.0 Vanderjagt, Mike  K 0.0 Browns  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   0.0   [IMAGE] Carney, John  K 0.0 Buccaneers  DT 0.0 Brady, Tom  QB 0.0 Brown, Troy  WR 0.0 Dilger, Ken  TE 0.0 Hakim, Az-Zahir  WR 0.0 Jackson, James  RB 0.0 Mack, Stacey  RB 0.0   [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 07:47
PM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 02:21:36 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January 1, 2, 3, Tn ZN6 citygates

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
02:28 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/28/99 02:17 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Scott
Goodell/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 1, 2, 3, Tn ZN6 citygates

Karen - All but S. Ct. and Boston Gas are good to nom.   Please let me know
k#'s.   Scott called me earlier and told me we are expecting a capacity piece
of 1000 dth and we bought the remaining delivered.   Whom did we purchase the
delivered from?   (I would like to call the supplier and give them the
breakdown so that I can get a contract number).

Noel - Also as per our earlier conversation, Yankee is giving me until 4:30
p.m. to turn in a contract # for their noms.   They are quoting their tariff
as
we have never turned our contract number in to them on time.    I need a
contract number for Tennesse and AGT for Yankee.   It is urgent.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
11:59 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Lenhart <mlenhart@alltel.net> on 04/29/2001 08:36:34 PM
Please respond to mlenhart@alltel.net
To: Matt Lenhart <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: The golfing nun]

Return-Path: <pdittmann@cline-law.com>
Received: from pigeon.inebraska.com ([199.184.119.21])          by
mta01-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP          id
<20010306151711.IHUD181.mta01-srv.alltel.net@pigeon.inebraska.com>;
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:17:11 -0600
Received: from cline-law.com (lin-dsl-static-209-50-19-034.inetnebr.com
[209.50.19.34]) by pigeon.inebraska.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA01390;
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:17:09 -0600 (CST)
Received: from LINCOLN-Message_Server by cline-law.com with Novell_GroupWise;
Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:12:58 -0600
Message-Id: <saa4aa1a.054@cline-law.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:12:41 -0600
From: "Patti Dittmann" <pdittmann@cline-law.com>
To: <dl04416@alltel.net>, <mlenhart@alltel.net>
Subject: Fwd: The golfing nun
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from ntmn1.YJBRV.com by cline-law.com; Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:51:41
-0600
Received: by NTMN1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <GGDC9ZR8>;
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:51:35 -0600
Message-ID: <0D4F7206F96CD311B0F30008C7C9E677646212@NTMN1>
From: Amy Staloch <AStaloch@YJBV.com>
To: "Terry Brown (E-mail)" <tbrown@tapco-usa.com>, "Steve Fox (E-mail)"
<Steven.Fox@westgroup.com>, "Rich Smart (E-mail)"  <ricsma@fieldpoint.net>,
"Phong Luong (E-mail)" <phongl@local284.com>,  "Patti Dittmann (E-mail)"
<pdittmann@cline-law.com>, "Jim Byrne (E-mail)"  <jmbyrne85@hotmail.com>
Subject: The golfing nun
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:51:34 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

 THE GOLFING NUN
A nun is sitting with her Mother Superior chatting.
"I used some horrible language this week and feel absolutely terrible
about it."
"When did you use this awful language?" asks the elder.
"Well, I was golfing and hit an incredible drive that looked like it was
going to go over 280 yards, but it struck a phone line that was hanging
over the fairway and fell straight down to the ground after going only
about 10 yards."

"Is that when you swore?"
"No, Mother," says the nun. "After that, a squirrel ran out of the
bushes and grabbed my ball in its mouth and began to run away."

"Is THAT when you swore?" asks the Mother Superior again.
"Well, no." says the nun. "You see, as the squirrel was running, an
eagle came down out of the sky, grabbed the squirrel in his talons and
began to fly away!"

"Is THAT when you swore?" asks the amazed elder nun.

"No, not yet. As the eagle carried the squirrel away in its claws, it
flew near the green and the squirrel dropped my ball."

"Did you swear THEN?" asked Mother Superior, becoming impatient.
"No, because the ball fell on a big rock, bounced over the sand trap,
rolled onto the green, and stopped about six inches from the hole."

The two nuns were silent for a moment. Then Mother Superior sighed ands
said, "You missed the fucking putt, didn't you?"