I feel awful about that--particularly since PGT did the same thing!  df

Steven Harris
02/01/2001 11:58 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Daily California Update.....

FYI. You should be ashamed asking PG&E to pay us up front for demand charges.
Apparently, California feels we are "predators"!
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001
11:57 AM ---------------------------
From: Lorna Brennan/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/01/2001 10:16 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Daily California Update.....

CPUC Votes to Keep Gas Flowing
A special session yesterday of California's regulators gave PG&E's utility
authority to amend its gas supply deals to keep supplies flowing to the state
past Feb. 7 when the current federal DOE emergency order expires, but it
postponed action on another PG&E request that Southern California Gas Co. ---
which has strongly objected --- be compelled to provide emergency supplies to
the PG&E utility's residential and small business customers.
Loretta Lynch, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, said
PG&E's utility is a "victim --- a victim of circumstances and a victim of
predatory practices by natural gas suppliers," now demanding payment for
future supplies up front --- not because the utility has failed to pay its
past gas bills, but because the electricity crisis has sapped its
credit-worthiness.
The CPUC action allows PG&E's utility to offer suppliers the option of
securitization or, in effect, a lien, in the utility's retail customers'
bills which cover the full cost of the wholesale gas prices as an incentive
to have the suppliers extend contracts with PG&E's gas utility operations
while the credit-worthiness of the company itself is dubious. It won't be
until next week when the utility begins negotiating new contracts, that it
will know if the CPUC action will overcome the suppliers reluctance to extend
contracts in the current situation, according to PG&E gas utility
spokesperson Staci Homrig.
On the operational side, PG&E on Wednesday declared a low-inventory OFO
because of a cold snap causing more supplies to be burned then pipeline
shippers were bringing into the system. The action was thought to help cause
the PG&E citygate price to jump from $11 to $17 on Wednesday. As for reports
of low storage, Homrig said that while the utility's supplies are very low,
they are adequate for the next week. They are not dipping into cushion or
base gas at this point, Homrig said.
Lynch said that PG&E has not defaulted on any payments, but nevertheless, in
what she considers predatory practices, the suppliers have required advance
payments or payment at the time supplies are provided. "These gas suppliers
are taking advantage of an emergency situation to extract another pound of
flesh," Lynch said in voting for the securitization measure. "Suppliers who
have been paid when due, are now saying regardless of existing agreements
'pay us today.' They are doing this in the coldest time of the year, so the
commissioners have to take these difficult steps to allow PG&E amend these
agreements in order to keep the gas flowing."
Part of the CPUC's action places a 90-day limit on the securitization option,
so with the way gas contracts work, in effect, it only provides about another
30 days' worth of supplies, said Homrig, who noted that almost all of PG&E's
25 to 30 suppliers have asked for special payment arrangements (advances,
cash-on-delivery or letters of credit) that the company cannot accommodate
because of its cash-flow crisis.~ Out of ongoing negotiations, the parties
came up with the securitization proposal in the customer account receivables,
thus, assuring them they will get paid.
On the gas side, PG&E has had sufficient revenues --- unlike its electric
business --- but the suppliers have not wanted to let the utility stick to a
normal payment arrangement because of the severe credit-rating decline in the
past weeks.
The CPUC met in San Francisco late Wednesday afternoon in the midst of a
whirlwind day of public announcements from the governor, state legislature,
consumer groups, regulators and utilities. A key piece was missing, however.
California state legislative leaders called off a morning briefing that was
to have offered the latest legislative proposals for dealing with the energy
crisis. Reportedly sticking points remain centered on the key questions of
who pays for the solutions and how deeply the state gets into the energy
business. A spokesman for the assembly speaker's office said he had no idea
when the briefing would be re-scheduled.
One piece of legislation that got through the state Senate (SB 1X) yesterday
authorizes another $500 million in emergency funds to purchase power. It also
would allow the state water resources department to be the utilities'
wholesale power supplier under long-term contracts at least through 2002. The
measure drew a protest from CPUC Commissioner Richard Bilas, who argued that
the state agency be "removed from that role as quickly as possible." The
bill, which was first passed by the state Assembly, was returned to assembly
committees last night to iron out changes made in the senate. It then would
have to be ratified again by the Assembly.
Meanwhile, consumer activists held rallies around the state protesting the
state bail-out of the private-sector utilities. This prompted at least one of
the utilities, Southern California Edison, to come out swinging, saying that
the recently released results of utility financial audits do not show any
"windfall profits" or diversion of monies from the utilities to the parent
company.
A letter surfaced in Washington from Gov. Gray Davis to the Senate Energy and
Natural Resources Committee, dated Jan. 30 and outlining measures the state
is taking to increase energy supply and decrease demand, sign long-term
contracts and maintain the financial viability of the state's public
utilities. The letter, a catalogue of recent initiatives already reported
here, contained no specifics on any long-term contracts nor legislation
signed that would address the immediate problem. Davis outlined measures
being taken to speed up siting of new power plants, saying an additional
2,000 MW would be online by the end of the year.
Responding to questions on another arena, Edison International's senior vice
president Tom Higgins said "everything is on the table" in the ongoing
negotiations between Davis' three-person negotiating team and the two
utilities, including dropping the pending lawsuit in federal court in Los
Angeles and crediting excess revenues from the utilities' own generation
against the whopping wholesale power cost under-collections.
The state remained under a power watch for the 16th day as the California
independent grid operator (Cal-ISO) urged conservation because "reserves
remain very low."


P.S.  I thought that you might like to have a copy of my resume to get a
sense of who I am and what I have done.  You can add this to the packet that
I delivered.  Thank you.

Saima


Bob Brooks in Boston

Bob Brooks is in Bostonfor a couple of days working with Charles River Associates on the NYSERDA study of the gas network of New York.  If you need to reach him, his cell phone number is 323-821-9075.

Southwest Gas Data Fix

One of our users has correctly pointed out that there is a small bug in the Location table of recent GPCMdat databases, which could cause some confusion in some reports.

The bug was introduced when the Southwest Gas pipeline model was split into two zones:  north and south.  In the location table Zone ZN194 became ZN194-N and ZN194-S.  Unfortunately, the Zone name "Southwest Gas Corp." did not get the North and South appendages.

So, the fix is really easy:  from Case Definition click the Data button then the Location button.  Select Type "Trans" and then browse down to the Southwest Gas Corp. entries and change them to Southwest Gas North and Southwest Gas South respectively.  Then your reports will also read correctly.

Thanks for letting us know about this!

Bob Brooks
GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting Systemhttp://gpcm.rbac.com


Tani,

Yes, I am aware of it.
Thanks for letting me know who
is the HR Rep in London.

Vince

Tani Nath
05/02/2001 09:01 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Vince,

I don't know if you are already aware of this, but Maureen Raymond has been taken ill and I understand has received medical advice that she should not travel before the end of next week at the earliest.
Tara is the appropriate HR representative in London; I will ask her to keep both you and Houston HR informed of the situation.

Many thanks,  Tani


See the email from Donna Fulton below.  Donna joined Government Affairs a
couple of months ago.  She was with Enron - GPG for 12 years doing gas
regulatory work, so she's an expert in FERC matters but is getting up to
speed on electric matters.  Please feel free to call her in addition to Joe
or me on FERC regulatory matters.

Also, the Cal PX filed at FERC on August 22 its proposal to implement a $350
price cap.  Interventions are due on September 12.  A copy of the filing
(Imaging Format) and FERC's notice are attached.

We should discuss what position we want to take, if any, in response to the
Cal PX's filing.

Sarah

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Donna Fulton
08/30/2000 08:51 AM

To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California ISO Ten-minute market

FYI - Attached is the FERC notice of Cal ISO's filing to implement ten-minute
markets effective September 1, 2000.  Do you think there is any interest in
our participation/intervention?


Please see the attached Management Report for September 21, 2000:

Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  2,332 307,594 312,595
Gross Notional Value $  1,247,389,376 154,514,054,916 155,727,296,820

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  10,975,323,263 11,071,074,755

New Counterparties transacting today  2
Counterparties having transacted to date  488

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 312,000, which is > 59% of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 2,100
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $155 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45.5% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 1,000


The Performance Evaluation Process (PEP) system is now open through Friday,
Nov. 17, for all employees to solicit and provide performance feedback.  This
process is powerful . . . if we provide meaningful feedback.

Management, when determining performance ratings, participating in PRC
meetings, and providing feedback to employees, depends on the comments
received via PEP.  For the users of PEP information to fully understand the
employee,s performance and the ratings identified, specific comments are
needed to explain each rating, including the overall rating.  It's most
beneficial to describe specifically what the employee did and why their
action was productive or why it needs improvement.

Comments on areas of strength as well as suggesting areas needing improvement
are both important.  Just as each of us needs feedback and coaching to
improve our skills in sports or other pursuits, we also need to know what and
how we can improve our work skills and behaviors.  We all benefit from
constructive feedback.

Please actively participate in the year-end PEP process and make your input
meaningful.

PEP Feedback Tips:
? Provide feedback when requested.
? Rate only those skills and behaviors you have observed this year.
? Provide specific comments with specific examples.
? Indicate performance needs improvement when appropriate.

Some Feedback Examples:

Skill/Behavior	Ineffective
	Feedback	Improved
		Feedback
Communication	"Jack communicates well."	"Jack was called on to provide written
updates for the Ajax project and he clearly conveyed pertinent information
that was easy to read, timely and suited for his audience.  The Accounting &
Finance management team commented on how his reports saved them time."
Teamwork	"Sue,s a poor team player."	"When we got to +crunch, time sending out year-end
reports, Sue chose to spend a day preparing her goals for next year, instead
of pitching in and helping check figures and box up reports with everyone
else.  We missed the shipping deadline and our reports were received a day
late.  This impacted our customers and caused our team to miss an important
goal."
Innovation	"Jennifer comes up with great new ideas."	"From reading an article on data
transmitting devices, Jennifer identified a tool she thought could be
utilized in our remote gas measurement applications.  Now implemented, the
remote measurement device has saved us significant monies and time."
Leadership	"Tom often displays inappropriate leadership skills."	"Although Tom closes
big deals and contributes significantly to the success of ETS, he lacks the
ability to gain the support and commitment of others when dealing with
support groups across departmental lines.  For greater success, he should
listen more and provide rationale for his ideas and directives."
Technical	"Bill,s technical skills are weak."	"On three occasions, Bill misaligned
columns or overlaid critical data when updating departmental, electronic
spreadsheets.  These errors caused more than 30 hours of rework and
approximately 8 hours of overtime to fix the mistakes."

For additional information or assistance on providing performance feedback,
please contact your HR Rep or Roger Sumlin at 713-345-7967.

Thanks, in advance, for your participation in this very important feedback
process.


Hi there,

If you could please help me find the Interruptible Purchase/Sale Agreements (files) for Contour Energy, Keywest Energy Corporation & Kick Energy Corporation I would really appreciate it.

When found, please return them to trading floor reception.

Thank you for your help.

Carlee
ext. 6739


I think this is what Dot is looking for.  I had it on computer so thought I'd
just email it to you.  Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/10/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           03/08/2000 11:26 AM

To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Enron Form 10-K

pls print.  thanksdf
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------

	Sharon Morgan
	03/08/2000 09:33 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Enron Form 10-K

Emily Sellers asked that I email the draft of the 10-K to you.  It is in 5
sections because we will eventually fold in the financials and the management
discussion pages.


Nope

From: Tana Jones on 01/08/2000 11:30
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Houston Chronicle Confidentiality Agreement

Have you heard from The Houston Chronicle?


Sorry, I filled out the form and sent it to HR.  It was difficult to rank the
candidate using the printed form but I thought she looked very good and after
speaking with Elizabeth to get her impressions (which I have not done), I
would probably make her an offer.  Sara

Carol St Clair
04/11/2000 01:57 PM
To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jacqualine McKoy

Please send me an e-mail today with your impressions of this candidate so
that I can report back to HR.  Thanks.
Carol


Mark,

Just ensuring you are in agreement with what I am seeing in Brazil:

- Andrea Bertone is legal counsel in Brazil who is working with you on
EnronOnline.
- Pinherio Neto is outside legal counsel for EnronOnline in Brazil.

Dave


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/20/2001 04:32
PM ---------------------------
From: Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/20/2001 04:29 PM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Herron/ENRON@enronXgate, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, L'Sheryl
Hudson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: ENA Merchant Assets in Condor (Project Velocity) a/k/a Trutta
(for those of you who do not know, trutta is a kind of trout)

FYI, we are establishing another structure similar to Velocity to accommodate
the transfer of non-merchant investments into Condor. [Project Acceleration
-- catchy name isn't it?] Also, there are some economies of scale here, so
that it does help to lump some of these things together. In fact, the
structures are designed to accommodate multiple assets being transferred at
the same time. [All of this assumes that Condor has the money to buy things.]

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Simmons, Linda   On Behalf Of Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Schuler-Legal, Lance; McCullough, Travis; Daniels, Eddy; Davis, Angela;
George, Robert; Tweed, Sheila; Mann, Kay; Carter, Bob; Clark, Barton;
Bushman, Teresa; Corbet, Nancy; del Vecchio, Peter; Stoler, Lou; Grace,
James; Gray, Barbara; Koehler, Anne; Lyons, Dan; Hodge, Jeffrey; Van Hooser,
Steve; Zisman, Stuart; Cook, Mary; Korkmas, Deb; Murray, Julia
Cc: Lowry, Donna; Vargas, Hope; Schwertner, Brian; Herron, Chris; McKillop,
Gordon; Ephross, Joel; Hardy, Stacy; Hudson, L'Sheryl
Subject: ENA Merchant Assets in Condor (Project Velocity) a/k/a Trutta (for
those of you who do not know, trutta is a kind of trout)

this is going out to a broad group and may not be relevant to some, but
please be aware that other ENA assets may go into the velocity/condor
structure at a couple points this year. also we can all pray (i think it is
ok to use this word in the current political climate and in a secular sense,
as i think our interests are aligned on this) that the ENE stock price goes
up and for more room in the raptor vehicle so we may see more raptor hedges.

1.. as most of you are aware, the majority of ENA's merchant assets are in
our project velocity structure. just to make sure that we confuse everyone,
we use condor/whitewing/velocity/trutta names interchangeably although
occasionally there are some distinctions (which i won't bore you with the
details about so you can disavow all knowledge if you have/need/want to).
just so you get the right lingo, trutta is the name of the ENA subsidiary
where these assets now have a home. ENA, under a servicing agreement, is the
servicer of the assets. i am attaching for your information the servicing
guidelines in the agreement. the major restriction is that ENA cannot  sell
assets for less than the contributed value into the structure. any EARLY
warning of a potential sale of any of these assets would be greatly
appreciated so we can check whether any restrictions apply and be ready, as
there are some logistics involved. an email to donna lowry, mary heinitz and
myself would be wonderful. if you do not do this, you may get on donna's
list. of course i can't speak for her as to the repercussions envisioned, but
let me suffice it to say that i am glad i am not on her list. at least that i
know of.

2. a number of these assets also have raptor hedges in place in addition to
being in the velocity structure. only the portion of the investment that was
on ENA's balance sheet was hedged. if an asset is sold that has been
"raptorized", the swap will need to be promptly terminated/notional amounts
adjusted etc. again, give us as much notice as you can.

3. we also need notice (AHEAD OF TIME) of any follow on investments in the
same merchant assets, exchanges of our interest or further fundings because
STUFF will have to be done. i will not bore you with the details, but this
STUFF cannot be done in ONE MINUTE contrary to the popular opinion of some
business types whose names i will not mention here. we also are obligated to
provide quarterly reports of the investments which describe any modifications
to the investments during that calendar quarter. the first report is due
april 11, 2001 for the first quarter of this year. we will be asking for your
input with respect to your investments at the end of march.

4. lists of assets currently in velocity and in raptor are attached fyi.

 << File: SERVICING GUIDELINES.doc >>   << File: All Velocity Asset
SCHEDULE.doc >>   << File: Raptor I 2001 list.doc >>

 Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Murray, Kevin
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Lemmons Jr., Billy
Subject:

Billy:

I would like to take the time to voice my opinion concerning the current status of recruiting at LSU.  I have tried several times to volunteer to help in the recruiting effort, and after trying Valarie Barnes and Traci Warner, Valarie informed me today that the team will not be travelling to LSU this week and indeed "after careful review, the LSU recruiting effort has been changed from a broad based effort to a Direct Strategy."  I know what that means, and frankly I'm quite upset with that decision.

First of all, I don't understand how you go from hiring perhaps your largest contingent from LSU ever, and one semester later decide that a broad recruiting effort is no longer worthy.  I realize the desire to broaden the recruiting effort to include new schools where an Enron presence is a good fit; and I also understand the need to downsize efforts that are no longer feasible.  It just doesn't make sense that LSU falls into the latter category.  The fact is that we are a motivated, hard-working, diverse, and well-rounded group.  We have both the intellectual and the social skills to excel here at Enron, and I think the recruiting team, by making this decision, is missing an opportunity.

There are many LSU graduates that hold high positions in this company, and certainly we comprise a large percentage of the Analyst & Associate Program.  By not recruiting in the same manner that you have, you are missing out on the many talents that future LSU business graduates could offer to Enron.  Concentrating your efforts on gathering a few resumes from certain professors or administrators does not allow you to realize our full potential.  On paper, who knows how we stack up against the rest of the field.  But, sit us down and provide us with an opportunity to express our thoughts, experiences, and skills, and I am very confident that you will find in LSU students the Respect, Integrity, COMMUNICATION, and Excellence that defines our company.  This is the manner in which we excel, and indeed that is why I think that I am here.

I realize that I am only one voice, and I have only been here for two months.  But, I take great pride in my school and the fact that Enron took such an interest in LSU and in me. It was my hope that after accepting an offer here, and working for such a great company, that I would be able to pass on how fulfilling this Enron experience is to others at LSU.  With this in mind, it is upsetting to think that I might be the last of the LSU graduates to be recruited in such a manner that was so exciting, so stressful, such a test...and ultimately so rewarding.

Billy, I thank you for your time, and I would certainly welcome the opportunity to speak with you more.

Sincerely,

Kevin Murray
Analyst


Is Brian available?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Petry, Norma
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Budget Review - EEOS
Importance:	High

Tracy,
I have the new time on the calendar.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Copeland, Erin; Venable, Rachael; Cook, Barbara; Petry, Norma; Walker, Blake
Cc:	Stark, Cindy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Budget Review - EEOS
Importance:	High

Unfortunately, something has come up and Stan will not be able to meet Friday from 3:00-5:00.  He would like to me the morning of October 5 from 8:30-12:00 in EB 5029?  Please let me know as soon as possible if this will work.

Thanks

Tracy Geaccone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Copeland, Erin
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 2:39 PM
To:	Stark, Cindy
Cc:	Cook, Barbara; Venable, Rachael; Petry, Norma; Walker, Blake; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	2002 Budget Review - EEOS
Importance:	High

Cindy,

The attendees from EEOS to the review with Stan, on Friday, Oct. 5th from 3:00 - 5:00p.m, are:

Brian Stanley, Keith Dodson, Blake Walker, and myself.

The meeting is to be held at EB5029.

Erin x67916


John, if we invite Scott then I think we have to add Eric Thode(PR/IR);
however, everyone would be in!!

What do you think?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato@ENRON
08/16/2000 09:24 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Dave

I hate to make the management committee too big but how about Scott Tholen.
He is very high quality.


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:
Task Due On:		8/4/2000
Task Start Date:	9/1/1998


Attached is a memorandum from Adam Wenner summarizing FERC's order on the
merger.  Also attached is the FERC order.  Please call me if you have any
questions.

Sarah

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 07/28/2000
03:32 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 07/28/2000 01:11:49 PM
To: "'Novosel, Sarah'" <snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: revised memo

 - 96558_1.DOC


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007590&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007590
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:19:34 AM
Requested For       : andrew.burks@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


after the game

From:  Bryan Hull
07/21/2000 02:53 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: El Tiempo

What happened to the baseball game?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           07/21/2000 12:56 PM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: El Tiempo

The El Tiempo on Richmond.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000 12:55 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           07/21/2000 12:39 PM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: El Tiempo

We are going to meet at El Tiempo tonight for drinks at around 9:00 - 9:30.
Let me know if you can make it.

Eric


>Monday, October 22, 2001
>
>To:     The Haas School Community
>
>From:   Pete Dietrich, MD, MPH
>         Medical Director, University Health Services
>
>On October 17, 2001 a specimen of powder was collected from the mail
>processing area of the Haas School of Business and sent to the California
>Department of Health Services laboratory for testing. The final results of
>the testing done on this powder revealed no evidence of any harmful
>substance. As a result, we conclude that there is no health concern
>whatsoever and specifically, no anthrax spores were detected. As with most
>unknown materials submitted for analysis, the actual identity of the
>material may never be definitively determined.
>
>The recent events around the country have generated a lot of
>understandable anxiety, but to date, there have been no confirmed cases of
>anthrax in the State of California.  As with this incident, strong
>teamwork, continued vigilance tempered with common sense will be important
>as we face the challenges of the future.
>
>If you have any questions you may contact:
>
>  Environment, Health & Safety  642-3073
>  University Health Services  642-1814
>
>Additional information is available at the University Health Services web
>site at www. uhs..berkeley.edu.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001
08:41 AM ---------------------------

firstcall.notes@tfn.com on 01/04/2001 11:27:59 AM
To: mark.koenig@enron.com
cc:

Subject: SQUEEZING BLOOD FROM A STONE: SEEKING CLARITY IN THE CALIF. CR...
(Part 1 of 2)

                          FIRST CALL RESEARCH NETWORK

08:07am EST 04-Jan-01 Salomon Smith Barney (Raymond Niles 212-816-2807) AES
DYN
SQUEEZING BLOOD FROM A STONE: SEEKING CLARITY IN THE CALIF. CR... (Part 1 of
2)

SALOMON SMITH BARNEY                                             Industry Note

Power & Natural Gas
SQUEEZING BLOOD FROM A STONE: SEEKING CLARITY IN THE CALIF. CRISIS

January 4, 2001    SUMMARY
                   * California utilities (PCG, EIX) threaten bankruptcy in
Raymond Niles        face of cash squeeze and decision by California Public
212-816-2807         Utilities Commission to grant a 7%-15% rate increase
ray.niles@ssmb.com   versus the 20%-30% hoped for by the utilities. Two key
                     points:
                   * (1) Based on the companies' statements, we think there
                     is material risk that the California utilities will
                     declare bankruptcy, although this still remains the least
                     likely outcome, in our view.  We maintain our 3H
(Neutral,
                     High Risk) rating on PCG at the present time.
                   * (2) We recommend investors hold the course on Energy
                     Merchants and Competitive Generators.  Favorable
long-term
                     fundamentals remain in place.  Ultimately, we think a
                     market-oriented solution will favor these companies, but
                     anticipate near-term uncertainty as the California
                     situation plays itself out.  Companies with most to least
                     California exposure are: CPN, SOE, DYN, NRG, DUK, REI,
                     AES, ENE.
TWO MESSAGES TO INVESTORS

(1) Worry about the California electric utilities:  PCG and EIX.  Material
bankruptcy risk exists for these companies.  Although we do not think it is
the
most likely outcome, we think the risk of a bankruptcy has been heightened by
the small rate increase proposed by the California Public Utilities
Commission.
Even if bankruptcy does not occur, we think that the California utilities will
continue to be challenged by weak balance sheets and ongoing cash flow
concerns
if adequate rate increases are not enacted.

(2) Hold the course on the Energy Merchants and Competitive Generators.  The
long-term fundamentals for these companies remains firm, in our view.  For the
generators, we forecast 20%-25% higher power prices, nationwide, in 2001 vs.
2000.  At the same time, we see the "spark spread", or the spread between
power
(revenues) and gas (costs) widening by several percentage points during the
same time period.  Both of these factors are positive for earnings.  For the
marketers, the opportunity to hedge and manage energy price risk has only been
heightened by the turmoil in California.  We also remain bullish on these
companies.

Exposures of Generators to California Power Markets (Megawatts)

 Company       Rating/Px     Total         California    % of Total
 AES#          1-H $52       29,798         4,100        13.8%
 CPN#          1-H $42         5,912        1,355        22.9%
 DYN#          1-H $51         8,804        1,400        15.9%
 NRG#          1-H $28       13,500         1,586        11.7%
 SOE#          1-H $28       14,622         3,185        21.8%
 ENE#          1-H $80         3,000             60        2.0%
 DUK*#         2-M $83         9,285        3,615        38.9%*
 REI*$#        3-M $43       12,869         3,767        29.3%*
*DUK and REI also have extensive regulated utility operations, so there
corporate financial exposure to California is far less than the percentages
indicated

WHAT LIES AHEAD?  POINTS TO CONSIDER:

(1) Someone must pay for the cost of power in California.  Currently, natural
gas prices are around $20 per mcf or million BTU's, which equates to
electricity prices north of $200 per megawatt-hour.  This reflects the cost of
burning gas to create electricity, and does not consider other costs, such as
pollution emissions, operating and maintenance costs, and the capital costs of
plant investment.

(2) The long-term problem in California (and elsewhere in the country) will
not
be solved without the construction of new power plants.  All the bellyaching
in
the world about high wholesale power prices will not solve the problem, which
is:  California does not have enough power plants.  The wholesale price of
electricity reflects supply and demand.  There are not enough electrons in the
state's power grid.  More electrons will come either from new plants (power
generation) or marketing (shipping more electricity into the state).  We also
think concomitant infrastructure must be enhanced, such as natural gas
pipeline
and electric transmission capacity.

(3) The generators and marketers are solving the problem.  Companies such as
Dynegy, Enron, El Paso Energy, Duke Energy, Calpine, Southern Energy, AES, NRG
Energy and others are either building the plants and/or marketing the power
and
natural gas that will, in the long run, "solve" California's power crisis.  In
fact, the high prices they are receiving for power and gas are both the
incentives and the reward for them to do so.  In our view, if sufficient new
generating capacity is built in California, the wholesale price of power will
fall.  We think if policies were enacted today to facilitate the construction
of new plants, by 2002 power prices could be materially lower than they are
today.

(4) Re-regulation would only lengthen and deepen the power crisis in
California.  Capping wholesale power prices, imposing windfall profits taxes
or
other "punitive" measures will not cause a single new power plant to be built
or a single new electron to be sold in the state.  Such measures would dis-
incentivize new plant construction and actually lengthen the crisis.  We
already think that the threat of re-regulation has had the perverse effect of
raising wholesale power prices by dis-incentivizing sales into the state.

OUR INVESTMENT CONCLUSIONS

First, the long-term outlook for competitive energy suppliers is favorable.
They are supplying a commodity in short supply.  As long as the supply-demand
balance, and price volatility remain, we expect strong earnings visibility
from
this core group of companies.  We especially recommend accumulating positions
in these companies ahead of the summer peak electricity earnings season.

Second, attempts to re-regulate or "punish" energy wholesalers could create
near-term volatility in the stocks; we recommend buying on such weakness.
Given our long-term view, we do not think that attempts to re-regulate will be
successful.  In fact, by doing so, policymakers would merely lengthen and
deepen the crisis that already exists.  Also, recognition that the wholesale
market is working well in other regions, such as Texas, would only stimulate a
debate that would lead to ultimate removal of any controls, in our view.

                            Price  1/3/01 2002 2002 LTG 2002
Company          SYM Rating Target Price  EST  P/E  EST PEG
                 M
Energy Merchants
Enron Corp.#     ENE 1H     $100   79.88  1.98 40.3 20% 2.0
Duke Energy #    DUK 2M     $95    82.75  5.10 16.2 10% 1.6
El Paso Energy#  EPG 1H     $80    70.25  3.70 19.0 15% 1.3
Dynegy Inc.#     DYN 1H     $70    51.31  2.25 22.8 20% 1.1

Power Producers
Southern Energy# SOE 1H     $37    27.94  1.35 20.7 25% 0.8
Calpine Corp.#   CPN 1H     $60    41.75  1.58 26.4 35% 0.8
AES Corp.#       AES 1H     $85    51.75  2.50 20.7 30% 0.7
NRG Energy#      NR  1H     $40    27.56  1.70 16.2 25% 0.6
#  Within the past three years, Salomon Smith Barney, including its parent,
subsidiaries and/or affiliates, has acted as manager or co-manager of a public
offering of this company.

WHAT'S AHEAD?  NEAR-TERM EVENTS

Near-term, we await several events.  Each of these has the potential for
creating trading opportunities in the stocks.

(1) Decision by S&P and Moody's on whether to downgrade the debt of PCG and
EIX.  They have threatened to lower the ratings on both companies to "junk"
status (i.e., below investment grade) if the CPUC does not grant a sufficient
rate increase.  We think that the 7%-15% rate increase proposed by the CPUC is
probably not sufficient to please the rating agencies, and that a debt
downgrade is likely.  We think a debt downgrade is largely priced into the
stocks, but the action still could create volatility.

(2) An emergency legislative hearing is underway.  This hearing is deciding,
among other measures, whether to impose a "windfall profits tax" or other
punitive measures on the wholesale energy suppliers.  Given what we said
above,
we think such a move could hurt the energy suppliers, but only on a near-term
basis.  We would recommend buying on such weakness.  An action that would be
positive, in our view, would be any move by the legislature to address the
root
cause of California's problem:  the restrictive policies that make it
difficult
to build plants in the state (e.g.: pollution rules, siting permits, etc).

(3) Decisions by the utilities on whether to declare bankruptcy.  The
utilities
suffer from a negative cash flow, and have incurred over $8 billion in
incremental costs to pay for power.  Their cash gross margin is negative
because they receive a low (regulated) price for retail power and pay a high
(unregulated) price for wholesale power.  The utilities' lenders are watching
carefully to see if any rate increase proposed by the CPUC is sufficient to
address this imbalance before they will lend more money on a short-term basis.
If the utilities cannot get short-term funding, we think insolvency is a
likely
eventuality, in our view.  We still think bankruptcy is the least likely
outcome, and for that reason, a bankruptcy announcement would have a negative
effect on the stock prices of the utilities as well as the wholesale energy
suppliers.

(4) Final decision by the CPUC on their proposed rate increase.  A final
decision on the 7%-15% proposed increase will be made today.  If the CPUC
decides to go with a higher or more favorable rate increase, this would be
positive for the utilities and marketers..

(5) Credit risk to suppliers - worst case analysis.  The generators and
marketers who sell power to the California utilities have significant credit
risks associated with those exposures.  The figure below attempts to quantify
those risks, which could result in a one-time earnings hit.  The figures we
have calculated are a worst-case analysis, in our view, and any actual
exposure
are likely to be much less.  First, these risks will only become a reality in
the case of the utilities' bankruptcy.  Second, even given this worst-case
bankruptcy scenario, the generators and marketers will likely be treated
favorably in the bankruptcy case, given their status as trade creditors (30-45
day receivables).  Third, based on our conversations with these companies,
they
have already taken steps to mitigate these exposures by tightening credit
limits, requiring payments in cash, etc.

          12/00     MWHs Produced @     Exposure @      Potential EPS
          CA MW         40% factor      $200 Price         Exposure

Raymond Niles 212-816-2807
First Call Corporation, a Thomson Financial company.
All rights reserved.  888.558.2500

Note ID: 320970
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       To update your order or to receive research on other companies,
              please call your Account Manager at (800) 262-6000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Thomson Financial Investor Relations  TEL: 800-262-6000
         75 Wall Street, 18th Floor            FAX: 212-363-3971
         New York, NY  10005                   EMAIL: firstcall.notes@tfn.com

      First Call is a registered trademark of the First Call Corporation


Hi folks.

As I mentioned in my last e-mail, I am sending reminders about our next
meeting Feb. 24.  I'd prefer sending this message closer to that date, but
I'll be out of the country and may not have e-mail access.

So, the reminders are:

Bring five (or more!) impromptu topics.

Bring a blank videotape if you want to be a video star (or just want it for
personal and or extra-me evaluation).

We will start class promptly at 9:00.

I look forward to hearing all of your revised speeches.

Take care.

Bill

============================================================================
William Sonnenschein
Communications Group Faculty
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
510-643-8005 (Office) or 510-336-1239 (Home)
============================================================================


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
07:18 AM ---------------------------
From: Alan Aronowitz on 11/14/2000 06:13 PM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Enron Global Markets LLC Monthly Legal Report (November 2000)

For your information, attached is the Enron Global Markets LLC Monthly Legal
Report for November 2000.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Regards, Alan


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		2/24/2000
Task Start Date:	2/24/2000


New spreadsheet that contains all the tissue mills, their capacity and number of machines is now located in:

O://Industrial Markets/Fundamentals/Paper/Pulp/Tissuemills

Monika Causholli


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 09:19
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 06/26/2000 05:37:36 PM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Molly.Johnson@enron.com" <Molly.Johnson@enron.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Scott, David"
<dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: Updated July FOM Volumes

The attached file contains updated July 2000 volume requirements for CES.  The
changes relative to the original request sent on 6/23/00.   Changes are
described on the worksheet labelled 'Comments' under the date 06/26/00.   The
only other change that I currently anticipate is to NIPSCO when they post our
July requirements on their EBB.

Please call me if you have questions, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - July00_FOM_Req02.xls


Jan & Linda,

In response to messages from both of you re: Jeff Dasovich's availability for
a conference call w/Jim and Bob
@ 2:30 PDT/4:30 central, Jeff tells me he is not available.

In the future, please send these requests via e-mail addressed both to Jeff
and myself so that we don't
duplicate effort? I'd appreciate that.

Let me know if you have any questions [(415) 782-7841].

Thanks,
Joseph


>From: "duy lam" <minhduy@hotmail.com>
>To: alicethuvan@hotmail.com
>CC: Nicole.La@enron.com, apnikko@yahoo.com, chuan_ha@yahoo.com,
>drble@yahoo.com, ala@hargerhowe.com, an1229@hotmail.com,
>c_lam902@hotmail.com, chubecca@hotmail.com, htr1nh@yahoo.com,
>hxdinh@hotmail.com, drkjustin@houston.rr.com, kdlee@us.ibm.com,
>melindango@yahoo.com, nickt@pdq.net, Paul_Shah@hotmail.com, Puc1@aol.com,
>stevenlee@myself.com, Trang.Dinh@enron.com, tinitonnu@hotmail.com,
>Tyler_Jensen@dell.com
>Subject: Fwd: 809 area code
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 05:56:18 -0000
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Diem K. Nguyen-Lam" <dlamrdh@ev1.net>
>>To: "Duy Lam" <minhduy@hotmail.com>
>>CC: "CHU-DIEN LAM" <c_lam902@hotmail.com>
>>Subject: 809 area code
>>Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:34:23 -0600
>>
>>
>> >
>> >                                 DON'T EVER DIAL AREA CODE 809
>> >
>> >      This one is being distributed all over the US. This is pretty
>>scary
>> >  especially given
>> >    the way they try to get you to call. Be sure you read  this & pass
>>it
>>on to
>> >  all your
>> >    friends & family so they don't get  scammed!
>> >
>> >      This scam has also been identified by the National Fraud
>>Information
>> >  Center and
>> >    is costing victims a lot of money. There are lots of  different
>> >  permutations of this
>> >    scam, but HERE'S HOW IT WORKS:
>> >
>> >       You will receive a message on your answering machine or your
>>pager,
>> >  which
>> >    asks you to call a number beginning with area code 809. The reason
>>you're
>> >  asked
>> >    to call varies it can be to receive information about a family
>>member
>>who
>> >  has been
>> >    ill, to tell you someone has been arrested, died, to let you know
>>you
>>have
>> >  won a
>> >    wonderful prize, etc.
>> >
>> >       In each case, you are told to call the 809 number right away.
>>Since
>> >  there  are so
>> >    many new area codes these days, people unknowingly return these
>>calls.
>>If
>> >  you
>> >    call from the US, you will apparently be charged $2425 per-minute.
>>Or,
>> >  you'll get a
>> >    long recorded message. The point is, they  will try  to keep you on
>>the
>> >  phone as
>> >    long as possible to increase the charges.
>> >
>> >       Unfortunately, when you get your phone bill, you'll often be
>>charged
>> >  more than
>> >    $24100.00.
>> >
>> >       WHY IT WORKS:
>> >     The 809 area code is located in the British Virgin Islands.
>> >
>> >       The 809 area code can be used as a "pay-per-call" number, similar
>>to
>>900
>> >     numbers in the US.
>> >
>> >       Since 809 is not in the US, it is not covered by U.S. regulations
>>of
>>900
>> >  numbers,
>> >    which require that you be notified and warned of charges and  rates
>> >  involved when
>> >    you call a "pay-per-call" number. There is also no  requirement that
>>the
>> >  company
>> >    provide a time period during which you may  terminate the call
>>without
>> >  being
>> >    charged.
>> >
>> >       Further, whereas many U.S. phones have 900 number blocking to
>>avoid
>>these
>> >     kinds of charges, 900 number blocking will not prevent calls to the
>>809
>> >  area code.
>> >
>> >       We recommend that no matter how you get the message, if you are
>>asked to
>> >
>> >    call a number with an 809 area code that you don't recognize,
>>investigate
>> >  further
>> >    and/or disregard the message.
>> >
>> >       Be wary of email or calls asking you to call an 809 area code
>>number.
>> >  It's
>> >    important to prevent becoming a victim of this scam, since trying to
>>fight
>> >  the
>> >    charges afterwards can become a real nightmare. That's because  you
>>did
>> >  actually
>> >    make the call.
>> >
>> >       If you complain, both your local phone company and your long
>>distance
>> >  carrier
>> >    will not want to get involved and will most likely tell you that
>>they
>>are
>> >  simply
>> >    providing the billing for the foreign company.
>> >
>> >       You'll end up dealing with a foreign company that argues they
>>have
>>done
>> >  nothing
>> >    wrong.
>> >
>> >       Please forward this entire message to your friends, family and
>> >  colleagues to help
>> >    them become aware of this scam so they don't get ripped off.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>Love is an irresistible desire to be irresistibly desired.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________________
>>Tired of slow Internet? Get @Home Broadband Internet
>>http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
>>
>>
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Check out the latest version of Enron Business Online at home.enron.com.
Click on Publications, then on Enron Business and "Volume 3, 2000".  In
celebration of Enron's 15th birthday, this issue includes a trivia quiz on
the history of the company.  Five winners will be randomly drawn from correct
entries to win a Millennium Zippered Padfolio with removable CD storage,
numerous pockets, writing pad and pen holder.  Also, watch for your print
version in the mail - it includes a full-color poster of Enron's milestones
from 1985 until now!

In this issue:

Enron Caribbean power barge drops anchor in Guatemala;
Enron starts a commodity market in credit risk with EnronCredit.com;
Enron Argentina's venture begins to bloom;
Transwestern's fast track solution resolves market bottleneck;
Enron acquires MG plc, the world's leading independent metal marketer; and
How WorkLife programs are making Enron the best place to work.


Just wanted to pass along some information.

If you have e-mails or notices you wish to have distributed throughout  Enron
they should be sent to:  Enron Messaging Administration/Corp/Enron.

For Information Call X35885, Messaging Administration Group

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058


Due to the holiday, on Friday, December 21 traders will have to use a Custom strip to trade Power deliverable on Wednesday, December 26.  These Custom strips will be used to calculate a separate set of Power Indices which will be published on Friday afternoon along with our regular Daily Power Indices.                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Please call our Help Desk at 770 738 2101 or a member of our Power Sales Team with any questions.                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Mike O'Neill- New York- 646 792 2620                                                                                !

Chris D'Ambrosio- New York- 646 792 2620                                                                                !

JC Kneale- Houston- 713 571 7821                                                                                !

Lance Leffingwell- Houston- 713 571 6691                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Happy Holidays                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !


PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th.  If you have not already done
so, please go in to PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and complete the
requests for feedback on the employees listed below.

If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
E-mail:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation.

    ALBRECHT, KRISTIN W
    APOLLO, BETH
    BURKE, TODD J
    COUSINO, LISA B
    GROS, THOMAS D
    HICKERSON, GARY J
    JORDAN, MIKE T
    MASON, HEIDI
    MCLOUGHLIN, HECTOR
    MURPHY II, THEODORE R
    PERLMAN, BETH S
    PORT, DAVID
    SCHULTZ, CASSANDRA R
    SOLMONSON, MARY C
    STOCK, STEPHEN
    WALTON, SHEILA H


bush.  dick & bush - it is just natural.  what are you doing this weekend?
lsu is on espn2 at 7 your time on sat night.  how much snow did the mountains
get?  get ready for n.o.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 03:13 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/19/2001 03:02 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen ODay/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-19-01

Please see attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/17/2000
01:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett @ ECT                           10/17/2000 09:45 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Systems - ERMS

John -

Again,  we are having "big time" systems issues.  While we are having the
usual length of time issues (a few people were here past midnight last
night), the issues that occured last night are much more serious than in the
past.  The system brought through totally inaccurate information on a few
books.  (Positions,  value,  etc.)  Luckily, these errors were all caught
last night,  but if a less experienced person had been on those books,  it
could have been a disaster.  (Traders getting incorrect positions and p&l and
interest rate and credit getting incorrect numbers.)  I have contacted those
in ERMS that need to be involved,  but I would appreciate it if you could
provide additional support to this effort.

Thanks,

Jeff


Any chance you can think abot this a bit for our Monday meeting?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
05/14/99 01:04 PM ---------------------------

Paul Goddard
05/12/99 02:10 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Legal Issus with Hypertext Links

Mark - the following issues pertain to the Enron Online Internet trading
project, of which I am now a part.   In addition to having me forward this
quick initial list of issues to Clifford Chance to look at from the European
perspective,  Louise Kitchen suggested that Sullivan & Cromwell may also want
to look at these issues from the US perspective for next Monday when she will
be in New York.  Could you please advise ? Going forward, if there are other
US legal issues facing the project, which clearly there will be, would you
like me to co-ordinate them through you first, as with this request?    Thank
you for your help.

Paul Goddard
+44 171 970 7047

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Goddard/LON/ECT on 12/05/99 19:57
---------------------------

Paul Goddard
12/05/99 18:58
To: christopher.millard@cliffordchance.com,
andrew.wilkinson@cliffordchance.com
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Legal Issus with Hypertext Links

As Louise mentioned briefly in today's meeting, we need to obtain a view on
the legal implications of  "linking" web pages and the news and information
they contain.  Some specific issues we will need a perspective on include:

1) Legal issues associated with providing hypertext links to:
 -  3rd party websites (avoiding unauthorized links such as in the Shetland
Times case in the UK). These sites may include other
    interesting energy sites
 -  links to news items (external URL sites), etc.. Is mutual consent enough?
What are the liability issues?

2) The flipside: Potentially allowing linking of our Enron Online site onto
websites of third parties, (e.g. in the form of click of simple hyperlinks or
through  "banner ads" which would take users from the external site,  such as
an FT.com, and bring them to our site as a marketing tool).

*3) Issue of Publishing/Re-distributing/Re-purposing news or other business
information from other sources
    (e.g. E-Trade shows Reuters news - what sort of legal agreement are they
likely to have in place on a global basis?)
    (e.g. Coral Energy - have an up-to-the-minute energy news presence with
all stories footnoted as "copyright 1999 by FWN" - presumably another
external news agency).

Most of the above relates to our plans for a "News Viewer" and "Links Page"
which would encompass both :
i) publishing Enron commodity-related news to external (and internal) users.
ii) displaying/re-distributing commodity news provided by an external agency
(e.g. Reuters, etc.) to external and internal users.

How do we satisfy the copyright requirements of others (i), and ensure we get
full copyright protection for our own news (ii) given that all of the above
will likely be viewable globally  ?

4)  As discussed today, providing multiple hypertext links to GTCs .
Although it would be far more preferable to automatically personalize the
site such that only legal information relevant to that customer is seen, as a
fall back option, would there be any issues showing the multiple links (i.e.
would users know which GTCs applied to them if bombarded with various
options).


Hi John,

Was great to see you last week.

Attached is the market info and maps that you wanted.

I'll send you the list of goals and objectives for 2001 next week.

Have a great WE,

Remi


If you'd like to go, that would be great.  Thanks.  Jeff

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Pierre Aury                           10/05/2000 01:07 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: hoegh galeon

it was just in case, at more or less no cost, you wanted to have a report on
the ship (remind you i am holding a master and chief engineer certificate)

pierre

To: Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: hoegh galeon

If you think there is value to your seeing the ship, I'm ok with your
detour.  Let me know before you go what you intend to find out if anything.

Regards

Jeff

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Pierre Aury                           10/05/2000 02:33 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: hoegh galeon

hello

will be in hong kong and china next week. could easily deviate on the way
back via singapore/indonesia and see the hoegh galeon. let me know

pierre


---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/16/2001
03:09 PM ---------------------------

Eric Thode
04/16/2001 12:51 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Whopper of the Week

A friend of mine passed this on to me...Gray Davis has won a Whopper of the
Week award from Slate.

Eric

> SLATE POLITICS
>
> Mon., April 16, 2001
>
> chatterbox
>
> Whopper of the Week: Gray Davis
>
> By Timothy Noah
>

> "I am going to will my way to a solution that is financially viable and
within the existing rate structure....'Leadership' means raise rates....
'Bold' means raise rates. 'Decisive' means raise rates. Everything means
raise rates. That makes everyone on Wall Street happy. It does nothing to
solve our problem."
>
> --California Gov. Gray Davis, as quoted by Dan Morain and Mark Z. Barabak
in the Jan. 21 Los Angeles Times.
>
> "[S]ome rate increases are needed to keep our lights on and our economy
strong. ... Under my proposal, more than half of you won't pay a penny more.
For the rest, the average increase will be 26 and a half percent. For many
of that group, rates will rise only about 10 percent. The heaviest users
will see their rates rise 34 and a half percent on average. That includes
business paying their share. This is in addition to the 9 percent surcharge
we've all been paying since last winter."
>
> --Davis' televised statewide address on April 5


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/29/2001 06:55
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/29/2001 06:53 PM
To: llhenneberry@ssd.com
cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jude
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Co Op City

Lisa,

I've made some preliminary suggestions on the term sheet. We will have some
comments on the asset management attachment, but I don't have those together
yet.

In looking through our files I don't find a confidentiality agreement.
Therefore, I'm attaching a draft of what we would like to have executed so
that we can send you other documents.

Thanks,

Kay


<<ledford-titan option to purchase , livingston county.DOC>>

Attached hereto, please find the draft Ledford-Titan Option to Purchase Real
Estate and Grant of Easement for your review.  Per my emails with Rusty, we
intend to messenger the execution copies to the Ledford's attorney on Monday
at mid-day.  Therefore, please send me your comments at your earliest
convenience.  Thank you.

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - ledford-titan option to purchase , livingston county.DOC


We are trying to think of something nice to send to Patti to show her our
appreciation for her hard work.  I was thinking of a gift basket from SPECS
with some nice wine.  Can you tell me what kind of wine she likes or suggest
another alternative for a gift that she may enjoy.  Thanks.


TIFP's parent, Temple Inland (an ESP), is now willing to provide a $500,000
guaranty.  This makes TIFP an ESP as well.  To this end, will you please have
a legal assistant prepare a form of guaranty that would list Temple-Inland
Inc. as the guarantor for the Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation
(counterparty).  The amount of the guaranty will be $500,000.  I would also
suggest that we lower Enron Corp's guaranty to an even amount.

Thanks!


The staff meeting that is scheduled for tomorrow, May 11 has been rescheduled
to next Friday, May 18th.  The meeting is scheduled to start at 2:30 pm
central time and will be in EB30C1.  If you are not able to attend, please
make sure that you send an email to Kim Hillis with an explanation.

Currently, the meeting will have Portland, Calgary, Sao Paulo, San Fran and
Monterrey video conferenced. Orlando, please call 713-646-3062 when you are
not in the Sao Paulo office.  If anyone else is required to call in, then a
conference bridge line will need to be set up.  Please let Kim know this
information as well so that this can be done.

The staff meeting is monthly and I will alert you when the June meeting will
happen.  Please make all efforts to be at the meetings.

If you have a response to the previous email of where you would like for the
management meeting to take place, please send them to myself or Kim.  I have
not received many responses!

If you have any questions, please let me know.


Dear Joe,  Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) says he is unsure whether an energy bill will reach the Senate floor this year.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says Senator Bingaman is also downplaying the chances that a new Republican energy proposal will alter the debate significantly.  The bureau will have the latest from the Hill on Friday.   Also from Washington on Friday, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Robert Priddle will discuss the world's energy supply within the context of the campaign against terrorism.  Priddle is speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies tomorrow, and the Washington bureau will bring us all the details.     Energy Markets Washington Editor Jack Belcher will join us from the Washington bureau on Friday.  Belcher is stopping by during the  9:00 a.m. ET newscast to discuss the EPA's new boutique fuels proposal.   The Independent Petroleum Association of America will continue a three-day meeting in Houston on Friday.  Interior Secretary  Gale Norton and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham are among those attending the meeting.  Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante will have details on the meeting from the Houston bureau on Friday.   Also from Houston, Spinnaker Exploration CEO and Founder  Roger Jarvis will discuss his company's third-quarter earnings results.  Join us during the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast for the Jarvis interview.  And catch Simmons & Company International Vice President of Research  Mark Meyer as he talks about how oil stocks are doing this quarter.  We'll bring you these interviews from Houston on Friday.       From the West Coast bureau on Friday, ENL's Kym McNicholas will bring us a report on the extra security measures being taken to protect the Hoover Dam.  The dam has 17 generators, each capable of supplying electricity to 100,000 households.  Catch the Hoover Dam report from the West Coast bureau tomorrow.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap video   (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Ditto as to my feelings of isolation and punishment.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 10:10 AM
---------------------------

Marie Heard on 09/02/99 10:06:36 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rotation of Confirmation Desk Calls

---------------------- Forwarded by Marie Heard/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 10:06 AM
---------------------------

Shari Stack
09/02/99 09:34 AM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rotation of Confirmation Desk Calls

f.y.i.
---------------------- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 09:33 AM
---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
09/01/99 06:58 PM
To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Rotation of Confirmation Desk Calls

Effective immediately, all questions from the confirmation desk to legal
should be routed to a designated paralegal on a quarterly basis (with the
exception of the very first rotation) as follows:

Susan Bailey - X34737  September 1, 1999 - December 31, 1999
Susan Flynn  -  X30975                    January 1, 2000       - March 31,
2000
Marie Heard -  X33907                     April 1, 2000             - June
30, 2000

You will be advised of subsequent rotations.  Please do NOT route calls to
Tana Jones who will be spending most of her time working on special projects
for our group.

This procedure should not affect any existing arrangements you may have with
a particular attorney.

Please contact me if you have any questions.  Sara


It appears that the volume on the sale to CES-Woodward Marketing is 4000/day
for March.  Tammi called Woodward to verify.


Agreed.  My initial thoughts --

1. More Government isn't the answer.  If this proves anything, it is that
Government is the wrong party to manage consumer's energy price risk.

2. This is a 10 year hangover.  The total bill = $### billion.

3. Direct Access is a better solution for California.  Let businesses manage
their own needs, rather than a small public agency never designed to take on
this task.

4. Too much, too late.  CDWR should have been buying to manage the cost for
2001, not worrying about 2007.  Any contract that starts after Sept 2002 is
simply not a part of any real solution.

By the way, I think that if pressed, Enron has to be very clear - we are not
advocating abrogation of contracts.

Jim

P.S. Jennifer will be ready to present something at the call.

From: Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/18/2001 07:37 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: CDWR Contract Analysis

Given Jeff's work on the comprehensive solution, we will need to develop a
relatively quick public posture on the contracts to convey to our lobbyist
folks.  Bev has already asked for some input.  I told her we would have an
initial view on Tuesday for our California call.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Steffes, James
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Kean, Steven; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara,
Susan; Comnes, Alan; Alvarez, Ray; Robertson, Linda; Palmer, Mark; Denne,
Karen; Sharma, Ban; Fraser, Jennifer; Tribolet, Michael; Thome, Jennifer;
Linnell, Elizabeth; Guerrero, Janel
Subject: CDWR Contract Analysis

Jennifer Thome will be coordinating the review of CDWR's contracts beginning
this morning.  If anyone has any issues that need to be considered in the
review, please make sure that Jennifer understands the issues.

Jennifer Fraser has volunteered someone from her team to help.

We will be working with ENA Legal in Portland (through Alan Comnes) to help
with the review.

Please call Jennifer Thome if there are any questions.  Jennifer will provide
an update on timing etc. at the end of the day.

Thanks,

Jim


I tried calling you to confirm we are all square on the webtext for Northern
but can't track down your ph. number.  Please call me if there are any
problems or concerns.  Thanks for the help.  DF  402-389-7449


Agreed.


I attach for your review a draft of the Agency Agreement, redlined against
the draft Simon Halfin sent us June 9th as well as a clean draft.

I understand from Greg that a few matters are still under discussion, such as
the payment arrangements, and will need to be worked into the next draft.

Please feel free to call me at 713-221-1414 if you have any questions
whatsoever.

Best regards,

David A. Tucker
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
Pennzoil Place, South Tower
711 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 221-1414
Fax:  (713) 221-1212
Email:   dtucker@bracepatt.com

 - #1127382 vRED - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.rtf
 - #1127382 v16 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc


I drove through kingwood once.

>>> "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net> 11/07/01 04:47PM >>>
Not to be too much of an ass, but who in the hell lives near Kingwood other
then my Great Aunt?

----- Original Message -----
From: "siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>
To: <siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <MarkM@cajunusa.com>; <Wolphguy@aol.com>;
<martier@cpchem.com>; <klyn@pdq.net>; <Frthis@aol.com>
Cc: <Rs1119@aol.com>; <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>; <john_riches@msn.com>;
<jramirez@othon.com>; <bwdunlavy@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....

> so, how many do we have?
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Frthis@aol.com
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:57:00 EST
>
> >Kingwood Cove it is!
> >Sunday
> >Tee Time(s):  8:06 and 8:12
> >Cost - $33 (includes cart) - that will be be $66 for Mr. 2700
> Huevos.
> >
> >ernie
> >
> >Anyone need directions?
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>
>
>
>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Calcagno, Suzanne
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Concannon, Ruth; Gomez, Julie A.; Superty, Robert; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Schrab, Mark L.; Allwein, Robert; Jaquet, Tammy; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Greif, Donna; Driscoll-Ernest, Marde L.; Molinaro, Jeffrey; Germany, Chris; Neal, Scott; Townsend, Judy
Subject:	FERC Approves Transco's Leidy Project, Petal Expansion, New ANR Lateral

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
Breaking News : posted Oct 24, 12:00 PM
FERC Approves Transco's Leidy Project, Petal Expansion, New ANR Lateral
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued draft orders Wednesday for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line's Leidy East expansion in Pennsylvania, a pipeline and deliverability expansion at Petal Gas Storage in Mississippi and a new ANR lateral to serve to 1,050 MW Badger power plant in Kenosha, WI.
Transco's $98 million Leidy East pipe expansion project would make up for the failed Phase III portion of its MarketLink expansion. The Leidy East project will provide up to 130,000 Dth/d of transportation from Leidy, PA, to northeastern markets in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. The expansion consists of six pipeline loop segments that amount to 26 miles of 42-inch diameter pipe, and about 5 miles of 30-inch diameter, mostly in Western PA. The project also would add 3,400 hp of compression in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Williams said this summer that it expects the Leidy East facilities to be in service by November 2002 (see Daily GPI, June 20 <http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/daily/news/d20010620e.html>). The Williams subsidiary said Aquila Energy Marketing, PECO Energy Co., Reliant Energy Services and Williams Energy Marketing are all customers.
Petal Gas Storage LLC's new pipeline would extend 59 miles to a connection with Southern Natural at a compressor station near Enterprise, MS. The $94 million project also includes a new 9,000 horsepower compressor station.
ANR Pipeline's lateral will carry about 210 MMcf/d of gas to Badger Generating Co's proposed power plant in Wisconsin. The 13-mile long pipeline would cost $19.5 million and should be in service during the summer of 2003.


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greg_Hathaway@dom.com@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, November 04, 2001 8:57 PM
To:	Mercaldo, Vernon
Cc:	Medeles, Gerry; Buchanan, John; Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn; Kowalke, Terry; Brent_Cinnamond@dom.com; Gregg_Tyson@dom.com; Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com; Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com; M_Lynn_Dotter@dom.com; Mark_J_DeCarlo@dom.com; Mark_Moyer@dom.com; Stacy_Lee@dom.com; johnwayneking@aol.com
Subject:	Re: Demarc Allocation Conference Call

Jason/Hilllary/Marc/Mark/Stacy:
Please mark this time on your calendar so we all know how this is going to work.

Vernon:
Please be prepared to discuss:
   How we have our pools set up should help us or hurt us?
   Beatrice fits into the picture and if this is going to cause additional
   allocations.
   If Demarc gets allocated are big contract gets frozen so we can not adjust
   our nominations
   If this is the case should we release our contract to ourselves in the field
   zone so we would then have two contracts which would allow us to not have the
   same problem as described above.
   Review the amount of capacity to and through Demarc by line.
   Specific example that includes all the cycles.
   Can you have an allocation after the timely cycle?
   Our priority going to Demarc from the Field if we have our nominations in on
   time and do not change them.
   What would happen if we were on time and got all of our gas confirmed to
   Demarc and then one of our customers changes their nomination in our pool

Greg Hathaway

Office Phone: 804.273.4421

Virginia Power Energy Marketing
5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Fax: 804.273.2927

greg_hathaway@dom.com

|--------+--------------------------->
|        |          "Mercaldo,       |
|        |          Vernon"          |
|        |          <Vernon.Mercaldo@|
|        |          enron.com>       |
|        |                           |
|        |          11/01/01 12:47 PM|
|        |                           |
|--------+--------------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                            |
  |       To:     Greg Hathaway/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER                         |
  |       cc:     "Blair, Lynn" <Lynn.Blair@enron.com>, "Kowalke, Terry"       |
  |       <Terry.Kowalke@enron.com>, "Medeles, Gerry"                          |
  |       <Gerry.Medeles@enron.com>, "Williams, Jo" <Jo.Williams@enron.com>,   |
  |       "Buchanan, John" <John.Buchanan@enron.com>                           |
  |       Subject:     Demarc Allocation Conference Call                       |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Greg,

Looks like 2:00 CST (3:00 EST) on Tuesday, November 6 is good from this
side.  Let me know if this is good from your side and we will schedule
accordingly.

Thanks!
Vernon

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY PM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

AFTERNOON HIGHLIGHTS:

TAXES: Supporters of a permanent R&D tax credit are plotting their next
move on Capitol Hill.

PRIVACY: Industry officials expect renewed attention to privacy legislation
in a Democratic-controlled Senate.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A leading proponents of free software defended a
non-proprietary approach to technology development.

NET GOVERNANCE: Experts said the process developed to arbitrate disputes
over the registration of Internet addresses should not be expanded.

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
People Column: Senior Writer Bara Vaida looks at the top movers and shakers
in high-tech policy.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/people

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- Budget Battles: Jeffords' Effect On The Money Issues
http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/budget.htm

-- Ad Spotlight: Dems Hit Bush Energy Plan
http://nationaljournal.com/members/adspotlight/2001/05/0529dnc1.htm

******************************************************
GOT A JOB TO FILL? CAPITAL CAREER SOURCE CAN HELP

Capital Career Source puts your job listing in front
of thousands of top-notch job seekers -- many of them
regular readers of NationalJournal.com.

Find the right people, right now. Call us at
(202) 266-7259 for details, or go directly to
http://www.capitalcareersource.com.

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Mike is just finishing up entering his deals - should show up in a second.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/05/2001 02:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource checkout

missing 2 deals

trader?

sell williams
370.00
Q4
mid c
25 mw

buy williams
353.00
Q4
COB
25 mw

thanks


Start Date: 12/27/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122719.txt


At the request of Bob Donohoo, I am forwarding to you two proposed Actions
by Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of i2 Technologies,
Inc.  The first relates to a proposed 2-for-1 split of i2's common stock
and an increase in the total authorized shares of i2 common stock to Two
Billion shares.  The second relates to an Indemnification Agreement between
i2 and Kenneth Lay.  Also attached is an Exhibit to the second Consent in
the form of the Indemnification Agreement.  We would appreciate it if you
could execute each of the Consents and return them to Bob Donohoo by fax at
(469) 357-6893 by Monday evening, October 16, with a cover sheet marked
confidential.  The current schedule is to announce Board approval of the
stock split on Tuesday, October 17, with the Q3 financial results.  Do not
hesitate to contact Bob Donohoo at (469) 357-6586 or myself at (469)
357-4497 if you have any questions or comments regarding the Consents or
Indemnification Agreement or difficulties accessing the attached.  Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.

                              Keith Larney

(See attached file: Unanimous Written Consent for 2-for-1 stock split.DOC)
(See attached file: KLL Indemnification Agreement Unanimous Consent.DOC)
(See attached file: Indemnification Agreement (KLL).doc)
 - Unanimous Written Consent for 2-for-1 stock split.DOC
 - KLL Indemnification Agreement Unanimous Consent.DOC
 - Indemnification Agreement (KLL).doc


I'm not aware of any TW contracts that are structured this way, but it's been a while since I've reviewed contract rates.  Do any of you recall situations where this may occur?

Thanks,
Elizabeth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth
Subject:	GRI for TW

I believe that, back in 1998, TW changed the way they handled GRI to assure that Reservation would not remit GRI if it was discounted.  That would have increased TW's margin on certain contracts.  But, the impact on margin would have declined by over 50% in 2001, when the Reservation GRI rate dropped from $.0066/day TO $.0030.  It will decrease again in 2002 when Reservation GRI becomes $.0018.

Do you have any estimate of how many dollars TW will "lose" as a result of the decline in GRI?
On 1-part discounted rates, I would assume that there would be little impact.  For example, if the market-driven rate is $.10 then TW couldn't get more than $.10 for the capacity, whether the max GRI surcharge were .0066 or .0018.

However, are there any long-term contracts where you collect GRI as part of the rate but do not remit it because of discounting?
For example, the discounted reservation rate is $.20 plus GRI.  TW billed $.2066 in 2000 but $.2030 in 2001 and $.2018 in 2002.
As long as the total rate is below max, TW keeps the GRI piece, but the revenue on the contract drops each year as the GRI component goes down.  (I don't know how many deals like this TW may have.  NNG has some.)


i have a very pretty back of the head

cash went out around 2-4 back yesterday.
today it is 3 back right now
bo trying to sell j/k at 4.5 on the open

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/15/2001 08:31:31 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: hub cash?

hey i cant get eol on my hotel int connection. cud u tell me what delta for
hub
cash was yest am and this am??? thanks

ps also saw u in fortune magazine-back of your head. your famous dude.

John.Arnold@enron.com on 03/15/2001 09:27:09 AM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: utilites?

so argument more switching than outright lost demand?    where are petro
prices on a comparable equivalence?

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/15/2001 08:17:02 AM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: utilites?

enjoy cabo-im not really surpised at lack of dmand recovery-will be slow to
recover esp with failing econ growth. the one thing concerns me about bear
side
is implied demand for us petro products is huge. doesnt seem to suggest an
econmic impact on that side. having said that absulte px for petro much
much
lower relative to natgas


Larry,   your ears are good!    I just heard the same news.    I sent some
data on emissions on the RB211on 1/31

resending the e-mails attchments.

In orfer to capture the emissions credits for shutting down the existing
units, we need to get the current emissions and the last 2 years of operating
data and talk to the state about netting the results for the permit.

REMEMBER:  for the first 6 months, we are asking to leave the old units
operational to use for emergency purposes during transition outages......NOT
BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

aRNOLD

Larry Campbell
01/30/2001 11:24 PM
To: Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, David Ayers/GCO/Enron@ENRON, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Butch
Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: TW Expansion emissions

Arnold, I feel the major permitting issue will be if we add NOx or CO
emissions greater than PSD levels (40 tons per year) at the facility.
However, if we were to remove one or more of the existing recip units at each
compressor station or reduce operating hours on one or more recip units to
allow the emissions from the turbine to be included with the facility, this
should be more than enough of a facility reduction that the turbine emissions
would pose no problem.  To add the turbine emissions without taking away
existing emissions from the facility will more that likely kick us into PSD.
This is a very time consuming and extremely expensive option and would more
than likely cause us to do extensive modeling and retrofit emissions control
technology on any emissions source which is at the facility.  Because we
operate both 2 cycle lean burn and 4 cycle rich burns on the system, our
emissions control technology options can be limited and could increase
additional manpower in the operation of the control technologies.

I would also like to bring up a potential problem that probably has not be
addressed and that is the issue of emissions impacting the Grand Canyon.  I
have been contacted by the state of Arizona several years  ago concerning
questions about modeling  our emissions and  the problems the state is
encountering with emissiosn sources impacting a Class 1 sentive area.  The
Grand Canyon is in this classification.  I dont know how or to what extent
our present emissions might impact the Canyon, however, due to the relative
proximity and prevailing wind directions toward the Canyon from a couple of
our stations, I wouldnt be surprised if airshed concerns become an issue.
As a planning tool, I would allow 4-6 months for non PSD permitting and 12-18
months for permitting PSD facilities.  Again understand that these time
estimates might be too conservative.  Another issue is that we will be
dealing with two different air agencies.  The State of Arizona and the Navajo
Nation EPA.  As is the present case, all major permitting for facilities on
the Navajo Resevation has in the past gone through Region IX EPA with
descretion from the NNEPA..  As you may or may not know, stations 3 and 4 are
on the Reservation.

I have left a call with Bill Kendrick to determine if I should initiate data
gathering for the permit application submittal or if someone else is to do
the permitting.  When I hear from him, Ill let you know what he says. In any
event you are right, we should probably discuss this further.....

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, David Ayers/GCO/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Expansion emissions

Options are presented to add a Mars to each of the existing stations (Option
2) PSD Permit
Base (Option 1)  is to replace the existing (offset) and install a new RB211
(iso 38,000 HP) NO PSD permit
This is a start.     Let's talk

Arnold   713-646-7380

"John J. Mcilvoy" <john.mcilvoy@rolls-royceesi.com> on 01/29/2001 03:26:21 PM
Please respond to john.march@rolls-royceesi.com
To: Arnold Eisenstein <Arnold.L.Eisenstein@enron.com>
cc: John March <jamarch@cooper-energy-services.com>, Kelly Doup
<kedoup@cooper-energy-services.com>
Subject: Enron-Transwestern Emissions

Arnold

Attached is the Coberra 6562 DLE emissions for the Transwestern project.
We have only provided data at 100 % base load because this produces the
highest levels of emissions between 70 and 100% power.  The CO vppm does
not increase until the power dropped below 70% load.

I hope you find this data satisfactory. If you need any additional
information, please let me know.

John McIlvoy
 - Enron Transwestern Emissions.xls

Larry Campbell@ENRON
02/09/2001 03:27 PM
To: Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Earl
Chanley/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, William
Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron
Subject: TW Mainline Expansion

Earl Arnold, I have heard through the grapevine that Stan has approved the
abondonment of the existing recips and installation of a turbine to replace
the recips at each  of the C/S in Arizona.  Is this true?  If so, I would
greatly appreciate the engine manufacturers emissions  and performance data
for the turbines air permit application.  I will also need  the turbine
noise data for the the environmental F-1 report to be submitted to the FERC.

I had also heard that the plan was to submit the FERC application by March
1.  The faster I receive this information, ther faster I can get started.
Your help in a  turbine manufacturer contact would be very helpful.


Go ahead.

Thanks

From: Truong Vu/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 11:41 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matt A Brown/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Memorial day(s) to be removed

Hello Jeff,
I am in the process of getting ready to remove Memorial Day(s) forward
from the Production and Stage databases.
I need your approval before I remove Memorial Day(s) as business day
from 2002 to 2025.
   Memorial Day (last Monday of May) from 2002 to 2025 as business day
    27-MAY-2002
    26-MAY-2003
    31-MAY-2004
    30-MAY-2005
    29-MAY-2006
    28-MAY-2007
    26-MAY-2008
    25-MAY-2009
    31-MAY-2010
    30-MAY-2011
    28-MAY-2012
    27-MAY-2013
    26-MAY-2014
    25-MAY-2015
    30-MAY-2016
    29-MAY-2017
    28-MAY-2018
    27-MAY-2019
    25-MAY-2020
    31-MAY-2021
    30-MAY-2022
    29-MAY-2023
    27-MAY-2024
    26-MAY-2025

Thanks,
Truong Vu
Enron Net Works, LLC
truong.vu@enron.com
(713)345-3416


Thank you for the email.

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Cutsforth, Diane; Robinson, Donald; Runswick, Stacy; Wilson, Susie
Subject:	We Are Short at the MidC for 10/11 ALL HOURS

We are in a lending agreement with PGE for 19 MW on light load, and 75 MW on the heavy load. You will see us short this amount in the RT position manager for 10/11

Please Buy to fill this short at the MidC, for the STNW book.

Deal # 812532.1 is our sale to PGE on LLH,

Deal # 812531.1 is our sale to PGE on HLH.

Please see Sean, Diana, or Myself with any questions.

Cara


The purpose of this survey is to gather information regarding Enron's current employee and community services programs.  Your feedback is extremely important. This survey may take at least 5 minutes.

Experiencing technical problems?  If this link does not automatically launch the questionnaire:
1.  Launch by copying the link below into your browser, or
2.  If you continue to have technical difficulties, please send an email message to human resources@enron.com. (Please leave the space between human and resources).
3.  Please do not forward this link to anyone else, as it is unique for each respondent.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0537666/i.asp?r=9881&s=XWMFDNQJ&l=9


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Adam Johnson
EnronOnline
x54877


Ameritrade Partners With F5 Networks to Increase Web Site Performance

********************************

********************************

View complete article at:
http://www.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=FFIV&article=20752130

F5 NETWORKS INC  28.000

SEATTLE, Dec 11, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- F5 Networks, Inc. (Nasdaq:FFIV), the
leading provider of Internet Traffic and Content Management (iTCM) products,
today announced that Ameritrade (Nasdaq:AMTD) is deploying F5's iTCM products
to
optimize system availability and performance for its customer

Other Companies Involved:
AMTD
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

, Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 03:51 PM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	05/16/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: "tana.jones@enron.com" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request for minna.taponen@enron.com

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034940&Page=
MyReq.