Shirley,

Austin. Please, set up an interview with me, Stinson, Zimin, Vasant, Grant,
Paulo, Krishna. Sometimes next week.

Let's make it a formal interview (coordinated through Elizabeth Grant).

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
05/08/2000 09:27 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: real options openings?

Vince:

Is this gentleman in Houston?  When do you want to bring him over - next
week?

Thanks!

Vince J Kaminski
05/08/2000 09:25 AM
To: Christopher M Kenyon <cmkenyon@concentric.net> @ ENRON
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: real options openings?

Chris,

We shall make arrangements to bring you over for an interview.
Our HR Department will contact you later this week.

Vince

Christopher M Kenyon <cmkenyon@concentric.net> on 05/05/2000 07:56:11 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: real options openings?

Dear Vince Kaminski,
 I was auditing Prof Dyer's Real Options class on Thursday when you spoke
on Enron's activities in this area.  I would be interested in exploring the
possibility of joining the group that works on real options in response to
and in anticipation of Enron's business requirements.  I'm currently
working in the development and application of real options methodology at
Schlumberger.  In particular I'll be speaking at an industry Real Options
Valuation conference in London (http://www.iqpc.co.uk/finance/rov/) and I
just had the paper accepted for publication in Operations Research.  Could
you pass my resume on to the relevant people to have a look at?

Thanks in advance,

Chris Kenyon

 - cmkenyon_cv_may00.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/01/2000 01:40 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/01/2000 01:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES

Subject: Re: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Here are some more prices.  Many thanks to Roger Yang.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Ken, here are the confidentiality agreements that should be signed prior to
our providing information to our vendors.  Each agreement should be printed
as duplicate originals on TW letterhead, and signed by an officer of TW.  I
understand that Mike Nelson is out due to a death in the family; Steve Harris
is out this week also.  Perhaps Julia White would be willing to sign in order
to expedite things.

If you have any questions or need further assistance with any aspect of these
agreements please do not hesitate to call (x30596) or come by.


Shona

A few comments :

As discussed it may be useful to see how the doorstep and BRM approaches
interact - anything written down that explains it ?

I am going to proceed with driving accountability for op risk assessment to
my controllers - we should discuss at the global offsite if it is worth
formalising this process - I am totally open to ideas on this.

Lastly, in conversations with Shawn we agreed to delay the full planning for
European BRM 2001 whilst we finalise this years reports ( lots of activity
due in October )

Thanks for the call yesterday

Mike

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           11/10/2000 17:48

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Transparently controlling the wholesale trading businesses - an
internal approach to internal audit

Dear Mike,

Thanks for your insight.  In the past few months we have established a
detailed approach to doorstep which includes interfacing with BRM.  Through
my calls the past week, I've been trying to update you so we can determine
how best to coordinate the Enron Europe work, as well as get an understanding
of what resources you can supply for this global initiative.

My next step is to contact some of the people on the list you gave me to
determine their skill set and what locations/commodities they'd be best to
work on.

I'll send you an updated schedule once I've finalized this.

Thanks

Shona

Mike Jordan@ECT
10/11/2000 09:37 AM
To: Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Transparently controlling the wholesale trading businesses - an
internal approach to internal audit

Shawn / Shona

We have talked round this issue for some time so I thought I would try to
take a brief stab at documenting what my preferred approach is (we will need
to do a great deal of talking before we would circulate widely):-

Aims
Accountability for internal controls must rest with the commercial support
teams and absolutely with the leaders of those teams.
A culture of control and operational risk assessment requires extensive
on-going communication and a structure of measurement and tracking.
Any independent process of review such as Doorstep and BRM should fully
leverage the work engaged by staff in the line and indeed should be focused
by it
All elements of implementing, completing and reviewing internal control
should generate defined output
We focus independently the review efforts for trading controls and
origination controls (we have defined the control structure for trading
offices, agency offices and origination offices and we must police our
labelling for each office)
The output from Enron's perspective is appropriate risk issue lists to be
discussed at control/governance meetings (eg at Sally/Ted/Fernley's level and
at the audit committee level) - the important issue here is that every list
must be extracted from an agreed database of issues - different lists have
different amounts of filtering applied - judgementally by senior/experienced
staff
The output from AA's perspective is their internal controls audit opinion
based upon our database and our review and management process of it

Trading Process - monthly
Routine judgemental self assessment on areas within the trading transaction
cycle - rating made by business controller is red, amber, green - with trend
indicator of static, improving or declining - see attachment 2 for full
listing
Monthly metrics collected for key standards set for risk management - see
attachment 1 (you will notice that this is a summarised version of attachment
2 - and as a senior controller I would expect the metrics to underpin but not
solely drive the judgement within the self assessment) - Shona, this is the
work that Mike Moscoso is leading
Periodic review meeting between controller and commercial lead to discuss
operational risk and areas of concern (red and amber) with agreement of
action plans for such areas
Monthly review by controller/senior controller of database where all high
(red) and medium (amber) risk issues are recorded.  Milestones for action
plans revisited, reconfirmed or amended
Monthly meeting between remote office staff and controllers to identify if
the risk rating for any remote offices has changed
All new information on issues raised by self assessment, doorstep review or
BRM completion populated into database
Database utilised globally to report to various levels of governance and
decision on whether original BRM and doorstep plans require amendment

Process - Yearly Planning
Checkpoint taken of
current operational environment (say end Oct)
proposed new offices for coming year or proposed changes to activity in
office, and
IT development plans for next year
Prioritisation made for doorstep - which offices require a visit and what
depth does report need to go to.  Note the doorstep review would be an end to
end review for entire business unit and therefore is the independent review
of the existing self assessment and would leverage the work by focusing the
review effort on areas of concern, the actions plans in place and concluding
on the 'mitigation of operational risk to an acceptable level'
Prioritisation made for BRM - which functions, NOT BUSINESS UNITS, require
external independent review - highly leveraging the above self assessment and
doorstep processes (could AA signoff simply by auditing our own internal
governance process?) - most likely reviews completed on functions that
assessed as concerns across multiple business - such as FX exposure
management, cash management, credit exposure management, IT change management
controls/process

Where are we NOW - if we all thought to do this immediately

We do not have bottom up operational risk assessment for all businesses - I
am suggesting that we demand that all business controllers at the Houston
offsite do this? 23rd Oct
The above would validate a high level operational risk summary that we as
senior controllers could put together for the audit committee - last week Oct
We agree on a robust tracking process - throw out one of the BRM and Doorstep
databases - November
Given AA have never historically risk rated their issues we should repopulate
the database from scratch - November
Review Doorstep plan to check that our risk rating for business units and
remote offices means that we have resource focused correctly - do we need to
visit all? - November
Review all of the above and blend into risk based approach for BRM planning -
end November to end December !!

Wow - lets chat about this

Mike

Attachment 1

Attachment 2 - the areas where a judgement should be proactively made by each
business unit controller -

Business oversight
System development project and change management
People management - coaching and skills/headcount gaps
Model Review
Stress testing and business risk identification
Operational capacity assessment signoff
Error management

Control Cycle
Risk Management Control
Recognition of risk origination
Monitoring of trading activities - limit checking, trader mandates
Specific transaction analysis - DASH, CACS etc
Transaction capture - deal form analysis and risk management system input
Logistics support - delivery position analysis, incoming and outgoing invoice
maintenance, post deal execution contract management
Portfolio edits - required amendments to previously transacted risk/contracts
Market risk/position signoff - both transaction specific and portfolio
management
DPR production and signoff
Limit excession reporting
Market risk feeds to GRMS - review VAR applicability (backtesting?)
Credit risk review - liaison with RAC over provisioning for credit charges
Price input checking and verification
Reserving and income recognition issues
Weekly Executive Summary
Monthly Revenue Summary

Documentation
Documentation generation
Re-review of contract loading in risk management system
Affirmation chasing
Broker information reconciliation

Trade Accounting
General Ledger account ownership
Balance sheet to CPR reconciliation
Accounts receivable maintenance/monitoring
Accounts payable maintenance/monitoring
Monthly management accounts by profit centre/business segment
Inter company/inter entity reconciliation differences
Legal entity balance sheet analysis for Fin Ops

Settlements
Outgoing invoice generation
Incoming invoice reconciliation
Exchange statements reconciliation
OTC brokerage charges reconciliation and processing
Nostro reconciliations
Cash management liaison


Rebecca Long
61 May Ave., P.O. Box 353
Chauncey, OH 45719
rivka62@hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Long


i will be home by 6.  come pick up the jersey early so you can get your ass
kicked at madden.


I'll try to give you a call tomorrow

----Original Message-----
   >From:      Rizvi Tabish <tabish.rizvi@capco.com>
   >To:          "'whalley@enron.com'" <whalley@enron.com>
   >Cc:          "'liz.m.taylor@enron.com'" <liz.m.taylor@enron.com>
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:      Request for a Recommendation
   >Sent:     Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:37 AM
   >
   >Greg,
   >
   > I'm sure that Liz has alaredy informed you that I've called a couple
   >of times to speak with you.  My reason for calling is that I am currently
   >working on my applications for business school and as I'm sure you can
   >appreciate, recommendations are a very important part - since you attended
   >Stanford yourself.  I remember speaking with you about graduate school a
   >while back when I was in Houston, and the words "it's a crap shoot" still
   >stick in my head.  That's what you called the application process and I'll
   >never forget the quote.  As I plan to apply, I will most definitely see
   >first-hand how true these words are.
   >
   > In any event, I need three people with whom I have forged great
   >relationships with in my professional and academic career(s) who would be
   >able to write me a "first-class" recommendation.  I feel that you are
   >definitely one of these people.  I still hope that Enron would open an
   >extensive presence in New York; I would must rather be there.  I really
   >liked what I did; u
   >
   ><truncated...>


ty


you have made me very happy.


Attached is the table you requested listing the states and the
baseline cutoff years according to the SIPs.  Anything that comes
on-line in the years following the listed year is considered a new
source and would not be included in the excel sheet that we
provided.

Please do not hesitate to call us with questions.

Thanks,
Sara

Also- Michael, for a discussion (with maps and listings) of fine
grid/course grid you can look on the website.  After logging on
choose SIP call/Section 126 from the left frame, click on
"understanding the SIP Call" and choose the last link listed, "EPA
Modified SIP in Response to Court Ruling (Jan. 2001)"  Give me a
call if you have any problems.


As promised in last week's meeting, attached is the transcript of Steve's voice mail.  Hope you all have a wonderful week.  Call me or e-mail if you need anything.

Thanks-
KB


You are in charge of your own destiny.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 03:49
PM ---------------------------
From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 12/11/2000 03:39 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA- Carlos' resume

Kay, I had already requested that Michelle Cash set up an interview with
Carlos; I had reviewed his resume and thought that he looked like a promising
candidate.  I am glad to hear of your strong recommendation.  Thanks BNG


This has been changed.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/16/2000 01:53 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

460524
dianna

broker has 230.00


(See attached file: news3.pdf)
 - news3.pdf


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
05/04/2001 03:26 PM
To: Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwyn
Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin
Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sofya
Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Muntz/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Anita Swanson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Christopher Burns/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Darla
Steffes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Geneva Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Boston/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jody Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John
Freeman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Judith Weakly/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Laurie
Willemyns/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Leon Schneider/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Charbonneau/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Alliece Morris/OTS/Enron@ENRON, ETSWEB@Enron, Joe
Zhou/FGT/Enron@Enron, LaDonna Dervin/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Hill/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Max Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Patty
Hermanek/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Peter Lu/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Randy
Cantrell/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Richard Abramowicz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Robert Fugel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tina
Dunnaway/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Wendy Koh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne
Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Carli
Smith/NA/Enron@Enron, Doug Fletcher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jacquelyn Matthews/NA/Enron@Enron, Janelle
Russell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, JoAnne Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kayla Bruzzese/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael J Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Miller/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle
Lincoln/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Huston/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alison
Smith/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Bernie Penner/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Janet
Vala-Terry/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lilia Penagos/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Patricia
Benington/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Jack Netek/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-7-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey.  When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send'
Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:       Vince J Kaminski

Login ID:  vkamins

Extension:  3-3848

Office Location:  EB1962

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop, Laptop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  Palm Pilot

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Shirley Crenshaw,
Anita DuPont
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  NO
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  NO
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 7:30     To:      6:30

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? NO
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<title>VentureWire People</title>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">

Published by Technologic Partners

EXECUTIVE CHANGES FOR  Monday, November 26, 2001

WHO'S HIRING

Tarian Software of Ottawa
By Giselle Greenwood
Tarian Software, a provider of electronic records management software, is taking advantage of the turbulent market. President Bruce Miller says that more than 80% of the people the company has hired are refugees from troubled companies.>>

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES
• PRINCIPAL-COLORADO
• GENERAL MANAGER OF SALES -SILICON VALLEY, CA
• VP OF FINANCE-SILICON VALLEY
• GENERAL PARTNER-SAN DIEGO

CEO HIRES

SERVICES

• VentureWire index

LINKS

• sponsor VentureWire people

• place a classified ad

• refer VentureWire

• send news, tips, releases to

vwpeople@venturewire.com

• FAQ

YOUR ACCOUNT

• change e-mail

• cancel VentureWire people

• feedback

• this newsletter
  mailed to you at:
 jdasovic@ENRON.COM

SERVICES

• VentureWire index

UPCOMING EVENTS

• Outlook Conferences

Venture Capital community and industry executives come together!

San Francisco Airport Marriott, Burlingame, CA
December 4 & 5, 2001

MARKETING & SALES

• WirelessCar Names Neal Jagoda Director of NA Sales

OPERATIONS

• Syrrx Names Carolyn Adler VP of IP and Legal Affairs

TECHNOLOGY

• Blue Falcon Networks Adds Paul Treece as CTO

MARKETING & SALES

• WirelessCar Names Neal Jagoda Director of NA Sales

IRVINE, CALIF. -- WirelessCar, which provides telematics infrastructure services, said it named Neal Jagoda, former director of sales at LHS/Sema Group, as its new North American director of sales. WirelessCar is backed by BrainHeart Capital, Ericsson, Telia, and the Volvo Group.

http://www.wirelesscar.com

OPERATIONS

• Syrrx Names Carolyn Adler VP of IP and Legal Affairs

SAN DIEGO -- Syrrx, a structural proteomics for drug discovery company, said Carolyn R. Adler joined the firm as vice president of intellectual property and legal affairs.

Prior to joining Syrrx, Ms. Adler was vice president of intellectual property at COR Therapeutics.

Syrrx is backed by Bay City Capital, CMEA Ventures, CIBC, Cooper Hill, Invesco Global Health Science Fund, Jaspers, Lombard Odier & Cie, MPM Asset Management, Versant Ventures, Wagner Asset Management, and individuals.

http://www.syrrx.com

TECHNOLOGY

• Blue Falcon Networks Adds Paul Treece as CTO

LOS ANGELES -- Blue Falcon Networks, a provider of content delivery systems for streaming media, said it named Paul Treece as chief technology officer. Mr. Treece previously sreved as entrepreneur in residence at Zone Reactor. Blue Falcon Networks is backed by Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Zone Ventures, Wasatch Ventures, and individual Tim Draper.

http://www.bluefalcon.com

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES

Principal--Venture Capital--Colorado

Exciting work with a team pursuing great venture returns in a high-quality living environment.  A funded venture fund with no legacy issues seeking an experienced Principal.   A unique opportunity to become the third partner and have a major impact on growing a successful firm in an established technology region underserved by locally-based venture capitalists.   Focused on early- and development stage companies in telecommunications and information technology, and the convergence of those technologies.  Compensation: Starting salary: $125-150k, depending on experience, plus carry.  Fast track to General Partner.

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

* Minimum 2+ years of venture capital fund investing experience.

* Strong telecommunications or software background.

* Operating experience in a technology company or management consulting background preferred.

PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

* Strong core values of integrity and honesty.

* High energy and driven to success.

* Entrepreneurial mindset, with the desire to build a top-ranked firm.

* Excellent interpersonal skills.

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

e-mail: box1207@venturewire.com
company: n/a
[top]

General Manager of Sales --Security Software Products--Silicon Valley, CA

Wedgetail Communications supplies technology for securing embedded and network devices and application level security software solutions. Our core expertise in cryptography and network device security has allowed Wedgetail to develop a growing customer in North America and Canada. Wedgetail's head office is located in Brisbane, Australia. This is a growth opportunity in a privately held company opening its first office in Silicon Valley.

General Manager of Sales

Duties and Responsibilities:

* Working closely with the CEO and General Manager of Product Development.

* Establish sales office and develop a team.

* Manage OEM relationships and sell to top tier accounts with a high degree of independence.

* Sell at a strategic level, developing and implementing strategic business plans.

* Develop and articulate strategy and products to customers and prospects.

* Identify market segments, create and execute sales strategy.

Required Qualifications:

* Start-up experience is a plus.

* At least 5+ years sales management experience.

* Background selling high-end software or services in the security industry.

* Relationship driven sales success record identifying and closing new customer accounts.

* Ability to work with other executives in a growing global team oriented environment.

* Excellent communication skills.

* Masters or BA degree in business/technical

e-mail: careers@wedgetail.com
company: Wedgetail Communications
[top]

VP of Finance--Display Industry--Silicon Valley

DRL is a developer of Next Generation Emissive Flat-Panel Displays.  DRL achieves up to 10 X improvements in Power, Size and Cost through technology innovations and new manufacturing processes.  Its proprietary Active Matrix technology enables low-cost and low-power Microdisplays for use in digital cameras, camcorders and video visors as well as other consumer & mobile electronics; its tiled Active Matrix LED technology targets indoor and outdoor 80-inch and larger video billboards and posters for dynamic advertising; its T-Flex Technology enables printing of Active Matrix Thin-Film-Transistor and Driver Circuitry on Flexible Plastic Substrates essential for low cost, high resolution Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode (AMOLED) displays in Mobile Phone, PDA, HDTV and Portable Computing applications.

Responsibilities

- Manage all accounting functions

- Coordinate the Annual Year-end Audit

- Forecasting and Budgeting

- Financial, Management and Operational Reporting

- Strategic Planning

 - Working closely with the CEO and VP of Corporate Development

- Interface with the equity investors, banks, auditors, third party vendors, tax and/or other regulatory reporting authorities

Requirements

- Strong accounting background and must be very hands-on

- At least 8-10 years recent industry experience

- Manufacturing experience (semiconductor and/or display industry a plus)

- Recent startup/small company or turn-around experience

- Previous large company experience (for infrastructure & reporting experience)

- Budgeting experience especially with large Capital Expenditures

- Experience in working with Venture Capitalists, Investment Bankers and Investors

e-mail: box1205@venturewire.com
company: n/a
[top]

GENERAL PARTNER--VENTURE CAPITAL--SAN DIEGO

Make a lifestyle change.

A "green grass" opportunity in an emerging technology region underserved by locally based venture capitalists. Capitalize on plentiful investment opportunities emerging from research universities and facilities serving the life sciences and technology sectors, Department of Defense (DOD) technologies and research, and next generation early stage companies evolving from existing models of success in Southern California. New venture fund with no legacy issues seeking an experienced General Partner.

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

*	Demonstrated investment results with a venture capital firm.

*	Strong communications or semiconductor background (10+ years of relevant operating experience) that started off their career in an engineering role and was able to successfully move into a more senior Business Management role.

*	Extensive personal and professional networks within the high tech industry

*	PhD in EE or CS, BS/MS strongly preferred

PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

*	A keen sense of humor

*	Highly competitive and driven to success

*	Proactive vs. reactive

*	Independent thinker yet a team player

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

e-mail: box1193@venturewire.com
company: n/a
[top]

To cancel, change, or update your subscription:

http://people.venturewire.com/account.asp


forgot to add 100% load factor last time


Bill,

Thanks for the info.

Just so you know, The Moorings provides airport transfers so there will be
somebody with a "Moorings" sign waiting right after you get through customs
who will get you into a van or bus to the base.  It's a little harder to get
to Tortola from Houston so I leave at 6:10 in the morning but don't get there
until a few hours after you guys (on AA5684 which gets there at 5:21).

 It turns out I also need everyone's birthday and address.  Mind sending
yours along?

Mark


How are we answering this type of question?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Becker, Melissa
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:33 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	question

I heard that we are to ask supervisors not to put a rating on the evaluation form.  If they want to, is there any legal reason not to do it?  I always thought the goal was to make the communication and documentation as accurate and explicit as possible.  Thanks!


mo value
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 03/31/2000
04:54 PM ---------------------------
MARGE NADASKY @
ECT
03/31/2000 11:37 AM

Sent by: Margaret A Nadasky@ECT
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Monica Zalta" <MZalta@darcyww.com>,
DMicklewright@darcyww.com
cc:

Subject: Best Annual Report - see Enron mention

As you can see below, Barron's has listed Enron as one of the best Annual
Reports.

Marge

---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret A Nadasky/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
11:23 AM ---------------------------

Katrin Haux@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/31/2000 10:51 AM
To: Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marge Nadasky@ECT,
Jeannie Mandelker@ECT
cc:
Subject: Best Annual Report - see Enron mention

FYI - Investor Relations magazine and BARRON'S, the Dow Jones Business and
Financial Weekly, named Enron the 2000 U.S. Award winner in the category
'Annual Reports'!

General Electric Wins Grand Prix for Best Overall Investor Relations

03/31/2000
PR Newswire
(Copyright (c) 2000, PR Newswire)

          - Investor Relations Magazine Recognizes Excellence in
        Corporate Investor Relations At Fifth-Annual U.S. Awards -

NEW YORK, March 31 /PRNewswire/ -- General Electric was recognized
for "Best Overall Investor Relations" by a mega-cap company at an awards
gala held in New York last night by Investor Relations magazine and
BARRON'S, the Dow Jones Business and Financial Weekly. The winners
were announced for the fifth-annual Investor Relations Magazine U.S.
Awards, which recognize excellence in investor relations among public
companies.

Winners were determined from a survey of over 1,800 U.S. portfolio
managers, securities analysts, and -- for the first time -- retail investors
who
are subscribers to Barron's Online. Respondents were asked to rate
companies and investor relations officers in 20 categories ranging from
management of disclosure to IR web sites. The survey was conducted for
Investor Relations by Erdos & Morgan, using lists supplied by The Carson
Group.

"Investor Relations Magazine is proud of our awards and the exhaustive
research that goes into them. They have quickly become known as the
worldwide barometer for investor relations practices," said Neil Stewart,
Investor Relations' Editor-in-Chief. "The need for strong communications
with investors in this ever-changing, fast-paced economy leads public
companies to rely more than ever on the expertise of investor relations
practitioners for the delivery of accurate financial information."

The winner of the BARRON'S Grand Prix Award for Best Overall Investor
Relations for companies with a market capitalization of over $30 billion was
General Electric.

Accepting the award on behalf of General Electric was investor relations
officer Mark Vachon. Also awarded the Grand Prix were Staples in the
large-cap category ($10-30 billion market cap), Exodus Communications in
the $2.5-10 billion range, and Calpine Corp. in the small-cap category.

A free, one-hour teleconference seminar at 12:00 p.m. EST will feature the
award winners discussing the recent investment community survey,
strategies and tactics from their winning IR programs, and forecasts of
industry developments on the horizon. Those interested should dial
800-475-0222, using 'cyberseminar' when prompted for the passcode. For
the accompanying Internet conference, log onto
http://www.emeetings.wcom.com/cyberseminar. Participants will be
prompted to enter 'CYBERSEMINAR' (all caps) for the seminar name and
passcode.

A webcast of the awards is available at
http://www.videonewswire.com/INVESTOR/033000.

  The Investor Relations magazine 2000 U.S. Award winners are:
  Grand Prix for Best Overall Investor Relations
  -- General Electric -Mega-cap
  -- Staples - Large-cap
  -- Exodus Communications - Mid-cap
  -- Lam Research - Small-cap
  Best Investor Relations Officer
  -- John Mahoney, Staples - Large-cap
  -- Jane Whaley, Exodus Communications -Mid-cap
  -- Rich Barraza, Calpine Corp. - Small-cap
  Best Annual Report
  --  Enron  - Large-cap
  -- Adobe Systems - Mid-cap
  -- IDEC Pharmaceuticals - Small-cap
  Best Management of Disclosure Policy
  -- United Technologies - Large-cap
  -- Delta Air Lines - Mid-cap
  -- BJ's Wholesale Club and Mercury Interactive - Small-cap
  Best Investment Community Meetings
  -- CVS Corp. - Large-cap
  -- Apache Corp. and Applied Micro Circuits - Mid-cap
  -- Lam Research - Small-cap
  Most Improved Investor Relations
  -- Texas Instruments - Mega-cap
  -- Xerox - Large-cap
  -- PeopleSoft - Mid-cap
  Best Communications with the Retail Market
  -- Microsoft -Mega-cap
  -- The Charles Schwab Corp. - Large-cap
  -- Alliance Pharmaceutical - Mid- and Small-cap
  Best Use of Conferencing
  -- Intel - Mega-cap
  -- Apple Computer - Large-cap
  -- Delta Air Lines - Mid-cap
  Best Investor Relations for an IPO
  -- Agilent Technologies
  Best IR Web Site
  -- Microsoft
  Best Corporate Advertising to the Investment Community
  -- IBM - Mega-cap
  Best Senior Management Communications
  -- Cardinal Health - Large-cap
  Best Use of Financial Media
  -- Applied Micro Circuits - Mid-cap
  Best Use of Technology
  -- Macromedia and Zebra Technologies - Small-cap
  Most Innovative Use of Technology for the Retail Market
  -- Microsoft
  Best Investor Relations in Contested Takeover
  -- Warner-Lambert
  Best Investor Relations in Friendly Takeover
  -- Tyco International
  Best European Company Investor Relations in the US Market
  -- Nokia
  Best Asia-Pacific Company Investor Relations in the US Market
  -- Sony
  Best Latin American Company Investor Relations in the US Market
  -- Telmex
  Lifetime Achievement Award in Investor Relations
  -- Lou Thompson, president & CEO, the National Investor Relations
     Institute

Published in New York and London by Cross-Border Publishing, Investor
Relations magazine is the only global publication focused on the interface
between companies and their investors. Investor Relations magazine hosts
annual awards ceremonies in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., continental
Europe and Australia.

Contact: /CONTACT: Jennifer Olegario of Fleishman-Hillard, Inc.,
212-453-2305, for Investor Relations/ 07:00 EST

   Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Attached for your review and comment are the final changes to the
Comprehensive Settlement due to the withdrawal of Altra.? Please provide your
comments by noon, Tuesday, September 19, 2000.? Thanks.

 <<settlementrevTPSP.doc>> ????  <<ld2d-#75672-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#75690-1.DOC>>

 - settlementrevTPSP.doc
 - ld2d-#75672-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#75690-1.DOC


[IMAGE]
 Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer!  Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.  http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi   Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News  now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    Standings, Summary  [IMAGE]East Division Team W L T Pct Back Strk Div Wks PF Back PA McKay Neal  8 2 0 0.800 0.0 W4 8-2-0 4.0 719.0 32.0 518.0 Martin Cuilla  7 3 0 0.700 1.0 L2 7-3-0 3.0 751.0 0.0 704.0 Eric Bass  7 3 0 0.700 1.0 W2 7-3-0 1.0 560.0 191.0 447.0 Hunter Shively  3 7 0 0.300 5.0 W2 3-7-0 0.0 704.0 47.0 751.0 Rocks  3 7 0 0.300 5.0 L2 3-7-0 0.0 447.0 304.0 560.0 FIBSABs  2 8 0 0.200 6.0 L4 2-8-0 0.0 518.0 233.0 719.0 West Division Team W L T Pct Back Strk!  Div Wks PF Back PA Fear  8 2 0 0.800 0.0 W2 8-2-0 0.0 565.0 186.0 392.0 The Klap  7 3 0 0.700 1.0 W3 7-3-0 1.0 650.0 101.0 567.0 Tori Kuykendall  6 4 0 0.600 2.0 L1 6-4-0 0.0 544.0 207.0 490.0 Baja  4 6 0 0.400 4.0 W1 4-6-0 0.0 490.0 261.0 544.0 Matt Lenhart  3 7 0 0.300 5.0 L3 3-7-0 1.0 567.0 184.0 650.0 Top Dogs  2 8 0 0.200 6.0 L2 2-8-0 0.0 392.0 359.0 565.0  Statistics, Scoring  [IMAGE]Matt Lenhart Actives Player Pos Scoring Score Beuerlein, Steve  QB   0.0 Davis, Stephen  RB 84 RuYd (8 Pts) 8.0 Dillon, Corey  RB 38 RuYd (3 Pts), 23 ReYd (2 Pts) 5.0 Bruce, Isaac  WR 130 ReYd (13 Pts) 13.0 Carter, Cris  WR 46 ReYd (4 Pts), 1 ReTD (1) (6 Pts) 10.0 Moulds, Eric  WR 61 ReYd (6 Pts) 6.0 Stover, Matt  K 1 FG (42) (4 Pts), 2 XP (2 Pts) 6.0 Dolphins  DT   0.0    [IMAGE] TOTALS     48.0 Matt Lenhart Reserves Player Pos ST Scoring Score Banks, Tony  QB RS 27 PaYd (1 Pt), 10 RuYd (1 Pt) 2.0 Collins, Kerry  QB RS 321 PaYd (16 Pts) 16.0 Dudley, Rickey  TE RS   0.0 Morton, Johnnie  WR RS 153 ReYd (15 Pts) 15.0 Price, Peerless  WR RS 138 ReYd (13 Pts), 1 ReTD (16) (6 Pts) 19.0 Raiders  DT RS 1 Int (2 Pts), 1 DFR (2 Pts) 4.0     [IMAGE] TOTALS       56.0  NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Shaun Alexander , RB SEA - The Klap Updated 11/20/01 With Ricky Watters expected to miss another two to three weeks, Alexander will remain the focal point of many contending Fantasy teams during their charge to the playoffs. He should roll up some fine numbers against the Chiefs this week.  Tom Brady , QB NE - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 The Patriots will stick with Brady for now, and Drew Bledsoe will remain the team's No. 2 QB. "I don't see any changes this week," coach B! il! l Belichick said. Brady is a solid Fantasy starter right now, but add Bledsoe to your roster as an insurance policy if you can.  Jonathan Quinn , QB JAC - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Quinn may have to start in place of Mark Brunell (quadriceps) again this week. Brunell's status is still unclear for Sunday's game.  Ricky Watters , RB SEA - Rocks Updated 11/20/01 Watters' shoulder has not sufficiently healed enough for him to practice, says the Seattle Times . He is not expected to return for another two to three weeks, meaning Shaun Alexander will continue to be a key performer for many Fantasy teams as the postseason comes into view.  Doug Flutie , QB SD - Top Dogs Updated 11/20/01 Mike Riley told the San Diego Union-Tribune there is no QB controversy involving Flutie and rookie Drew Brees. "Doug is going to be our quarterback," he said. "You can talk about controversy all you want, but there is none within this building. He is our quarterback. He will start. He will get us the next win the next week." Still, Flutie is not playing well enought to satisfy most Fantasy owners.  Mark Bruener , TE PIT - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Bruener will miss the rest of the season after undergoing shoulder injury. His loss may adversely affect Jerome Bettis' statistics, because Bruener is widely regarded as the best run-blocking tight end in football.  Tyrone Wheatley , RB OAK - Tori Kuykendall Updated 11/20/01 Wheatley told the Contra-Costa Times he is no longer being bothered by a knee injury. He expects to play on Sunday.  Erron Kinney , TE TEN - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01! Kinney (calf) may play this week after missing three games. He was expected to return to practice early this week.  Frank Wycheck , TE TEN - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Wycheck (calf) will be limited in practice this week. He may be a risky start in Week 11.  Steve McNair , QB TEN - Rocks Updated 11/20/01 The Tennessean says McNair's hand was sore when he arrived at the team's practice facility on Monday. Jeff Fisher now says he doesn't expect him to miss any practice time this week.   Derrick Alexander , WR KC - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/20/01 Alexander (ribs) has returned to practice. He is expected to start against Seattle.  Marvin Minnis , WR KC - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Minnis (ankle) is listed as doubtful for Sunday's game. Larry Parker may have to start in his place,  Reggie Wayne , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 ! Wayne has a sprained knee ligament, and is doubtful for Sunday's game against New Orleans. Terrence Wilkins may have to start in his place.  Jerome Pathon , WR IND - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/20/01 Pathon (foot) is done for the season. He will be put on injured reserve. Reggie Wayne (knee) is also hurting, meaning Terrence Wilkins might have to be moved back into the starting lineup.   Jay Fiedler , QB MIA - McKay Neal Updated 11/20/01 Dave Wannstedt told the Miami Herald there is no QB controversy surrounding Fielder and backup Ray ri! gh! t now. ``That's kind of hypothetical,'' he said. ``Jay is the starter, and my only comment is we're going to get it squared away and play turnover-free football.''  Rod Smith , WR DEN - Baja Updated 11/20/01 Mike Shanahan said he does not know if Smith (ankle) will be sufficiently healed to play in Thursday's game against the Cowboys. "We'll get a chance to evaluate that during the week and see," Shanahan told the Denver Post. "If he can help our football team, he'll play. If he's in a situation where he can't perform at the level that we think can help our team, then we'll keep him out and put somebody else in."   Benjamin Gay , RB CLE - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 The Cleveland Plain-Dealer says Butch Davis won't indicate how much Gay will play in the near future. "We'll try to get him involved in some of the games," Davis said. "We'll see."   Kevin Lockett , WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Lockett, who suffered a rib injury last weekend against Denver, expects to play on Sunday against Philadelphia. However, the wide receiver has no real value as a Fantasy player at this point.   Tony Banks , QB WAS - Matt Lenhart Updat! ed! 11/20/01 Barring any setbacks, Banks will start Sunday's game against Philadelphia. Banks, who suffered a concussion last weekend vs. Denver, hasn't been feeling any after effects of the injury and should be under center for the 'Skins.   Jacquez Green , WR TB - Hunter Shively Updated 11/20/01 Green (abdomen) is expected to return to practice on Wednesday at full strength. He's been inconsistent this season, and is best used when the matchup is favorable.   Terrell Owens , WR SF - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/20/01 Owens suffered a sprained left knee and ankle during the overtime session of last weekend's game against Carolina. The injuries aren't considered serious, however, and Owens is expected to be in the starting lineup on Sunday Indianapolis.   Cecil Martin , RB PHI - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Martin suffered a hamstring injury during Sunday's game against Dallas. He'll miss a few days of practice, but is expected to play in this weekend's game against Washington. Martin has no real value as a Fantasy player, but he is a key blocker for Duce Staley.    Giants , DT NYG - Free Agent Upd! at! ed 11/20/01 According to the New York Post, cornerback Jason Sehorn's surgically-repaired right knee began giving him problems again this past weekend. In fact, the team was unsure that he'd be able to cover either Randy Moss or Cris Carter on Monday night, but he played anyway. If he continues to play on a bad wheel, you should consider starting any receivers opposing Sehorn the rest of the season.   Elvis Grbac , QB BAL - Eric Bass Updated 11/20/01 The Baltimore Sun says there is no indication that Grbac will be replaced as the team's starting QB. Still, he is not performing well enough to start for most Fantasy teams.  Donald Driver , WR GB - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Driver is still dealing with a thigh injury, and is expected to miss Thursday's game against Detroit. The reserve wideout has no real value as a Fantasy player at this point.    Ravens , DT BAL - Eric Bass Updated 11/20/01 Defensive end Michael McCrary will miss the rest of the season after undergoing knee surgery. His loss will certainly lower the sack output of the Baltimore defense and may mean the team will allow more passing yardage than usual.    Cowboys , DT DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Linebacker Dexter Coakley, who was expected to miss two weeks due to a sprained knee, will likely get the start on Thursday after being out for just one game. He'll help keep Denver's running game in check, but don't expect his presence to give Dallas' defense added Fantasy value as a whole.   Emmitt Smith , RB DAL - Rocks Updated 11/20/01 Smith (knee) will start on Thursday's game against Denver. "I'm not 100 percent, but I'm healthy enough to do my job," Smith told the Dallas Morning Star . He'll struggle to post solid Fantasy numbers due to Dallas' horrid passing game, so bench him this week if at all possible.     Donald Hayes , WR CAR - Eric Bass Updated 11/20/01 Hayes suffered bruised ribs during Sunday's game against San Francisco. He may miss some practice time this week, but he's expected to play this weekend against Atlanta. The Falcons secondary is one of the worst in the league, so Hayes could turn into a good sleeper pick in Week 11.   Terry Hardy , TE ARI - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Hardy is expected to return t! o! practice this week after missing three games due to shoulder injury. However, he is not certain to play on Sunday against San Diego.   More Updates  [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


I thought I approved this.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:19 PM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval

The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Christopher J Gaskill
Report Name: Gaskill111301
Days In Mgr. Queue: 12


By "these customers" you mean the non-mass market - ie, Home Depot?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rexrode, Stuart
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Gahn, Scott; Sharp, Greg
Subject:	RE: HOME DEPOT, ETC --- TEXAS CUSTOMERS GREATER THAN 1 MW

My understanding is that we are sending out an affirmative consent letter to these customers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	07 December 2001 17:30
To:	Gahn, Scott; Rexrode, Stuart; Schwarz, Angela; Blachman, Jeremy; Sharp, Greg; Sharp, Vicki; Herndon, Rogers; Wagner, Joseph; Kingerski, Harry; Frank, Robert; Greiner, Kevin; Hughes, Evan; Smith, Mike D.; Keller, James E.; Mahoney, Peggy
Subject:	HOME DEPOT, ETC --- TEXAS CUSTOMERS GREATER THAN 1 MW

There was a discussion today involving Home Depot and our inaction regarding not having sent out a DASR.

To make sure that we are all on the same page (please let me know if anyone disagrees with the following) --

1.	We (meaning EES broadly) do have customers with metered demand greater than 1 MW (otherwise known as non-Price to Beat).

2.	For non-Price to Beat customers that have not been DASRd or have no contract, the Affiliated REP will provide service to the customer beginning on their first meter reading after Jan 1, 2002 under a blanket Term of Service Agreement (let me know if you want copies) under the following price terms =

TXU Energy Services cost = $5 per kw for Demand (based on highest demand in last 12 months) + $50/Mwh + $100/month + Delivery Costs + Taxes.
Reliant Energy Services cost = [1.5 * Daily Gas Index * kwh] + [{1.15 * Capacity Price} * kw (billing demand)] + $490/month + Delivery Costs + Taxes.

3.	If the customer does not pay their bill, they will then be placed on POLR service.

4.	The AREP offers month-to-month service with a 30 calendar day notice provision for cancellation.

5.	Next opportunity to DASR these customers will be Dec 16, 2001.

6.	When we find a buyer for the Texas book or all of the company, EES intends to obtain permission from the customer to assign the non-Price to Beat customers.  This implies that we will not be sending out the Opt-Out provision to non-Price to Beat customers.

Jim


give me a call at work about tonight.......713-853-6203


It turns out that quite a bit has been happening without us so we may be
inundated with information over the next day or so.  Let me know if the
message below does not come through in color since it will be difficult to
decipher.

Louise is quite anxious to finalize the ETA, PA and Read-only PA and I
explained that we were still waiting for the proposed changes from London.
Knowing Louise I have a feeling we may see that stuff soon.

Since we seem to be a bit behind schedule, Louise agreed that an all-hands
legal meeting next week might be premature and she is contacting the London
team to discuss scheduling.  I'll let you know as soon as I have anything
more to report on the calendar.

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/13/99 11:51 AM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
07/13/99 11:00 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Registration Process Questions

You may want to forward this to Sullivan and Cromwell
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT on 07/13/99 05:02
PM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
07/05/99 06:23 PM
To: Elena Kapralova/LON/ECTRobert Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT,
Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT, Timothy.Hughes@cliffordchance.com,
Andrew.Wilkinson@cliffordchance.com, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, David G Mally/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Registration Process Questions

Let's be clear about all of the confusion which took place last week on how
to register,  this is what we are doing.  Any comments or problems please
reply.  I have tried to address everyone's points (see end of email).

1.  Current Customers

We are going to pre-register a large number of customers prior to the
launch.   These customers will not  receive any documentation from us apart
from the one page application form (Password Application) and a nice glossy
marketing brochure.

They will not be asked to fill in any form of registration documentation.
All of the approvals should be done internally as we already trade with these
people.

Procedure
1.  A list of customers to be pre-registered is compiled.
2.  Sign off on the list is obtained from Tax, Credit, Legal etc.
3. The customer receives from Enron a Password Application Form (postal) and
a marketing brochure (this will be very glossy with only high level details
nothing specific to the customer but will outline the registration process
(to include whether to send to UK os  US office).  The PA will be specific to
each country and therefore we should be able to send out the specific PA to
each counterparty.
4. The customer signs the document (Password Application) and returns to
Enron.
5. Enron dispatches the System Administrator password and login.
6.  The customer logs in and the immediately is greeted with the ETA (as
loaded for the specific counterparty profile which will be based on the
country of origin of the customer).  The ETA must be printable and the
customer will scroll through the document to the end where he has the choice
of either "I accept" or "I do not accept" (with no default on enter).  This
ETA must be printable.
7.   The customer then enters the site and transacts.  If the customer is
transacting under a master then the GTC for a particular product will not
need to be accepted, if the customer is dealing without a master then any
person using the administrator password or any of its subsidiary passwords
can accept the GTC (it only needs to be accepted once by any one person under
this SA password).  The system will need to be loaded with the information as
to whether a counterparty requires GTC or not for each commodity/product type.

Elena's questions
Q:  Will PA be available as well as ETA for viewing and printing in the
"House"?  No only in the garden.  PA and ETA for all jurisdictions will be
available and printable in the garden (drop down box would be my suggestion).

2.  New Customers

There are two alternative routes possible.

Procedure 1: Off Line Registration

Potential Customer will e-mail, phone to express their willingness to trade
online, i.e. get the ID and Password
Enron will mail Registration Pack to the Potential Customer with PA for
appropriate jurisdiction.
Customer will fill in Registration Form, sign PA and mail it back to Enron
If the customer is approved for Online Trading by Enron, it will receive the
system administrator login and password.
The customer logs in and the immediately is greeted with the ETA (as loaded
for the specific counterparty profile which will be based on the country of
origin of the customer).  The ETA must be printable and the customer will
scroll through the document to the end where he has the choice of either "I
accept" or "I do not accept" (with no default on enter).  This ETA must be
printable.
The customer then enters the site and transacts.The customer is transacting
GTCs for all  products and   any person using the administrator password or
any of its subsidiary passwords can accept the GTC (it only needs to be
accepted once by any one person under this SA password).

Procedure Two:  Partial OnLine Registration
Registration Pack including PAs for all jurisdictions will be available in
the Garden
Customer has to chose (drop down box) which jurisdiction he is in,  print out
appropriate Registration Form and PA,  fill in Registration Form, sign PA and
mail it to Enron
Customer will fill in Registration Form, sign PA and mail it back to Enron
If the customer is approved for Online Trading by Enron, it will receive the
system administrator login and password.
The customer logs in and the immediately is greeted with the ETA (as loaded
for the specific counterparty profile which will be based on the country of
origin of the customer).  The ETA must be printable and the customer will
scroll through the document to the end where he has the choice of either "I
accept" or "I do not accept" (with no default on enter).  This ETA must be
printable.
The customer then enters the site and transacts.The customer is transacting
GTCs for all  products and   any person using the administrator password or
any of its subsidiary passwords can accept the GTC (it only needs to be
accepted once by any one person under this SA password).

The Registration Form is currently in draft form and I attach below but
clearly Janine may want to add more on her side.

Elena's questions
Q:  1) Alternative 1 or 2? Both
 2) In the Garden there must be a sentence (to be drafted by CC) to inform
potential customers that there request for access may not be granted.  YES -
In the  garden there must be a phrase that any access may not be granted and
that it is solely on our discretion (this is not just for Read Only its for
all applications)
 3) Should all ETAs and PAs be available and printable in the Garden? CC
prefers them to be available...YES

3.  Read Only Customers

If a customer / counterparty does not respond by signing our PA and therefore
has not access to the site and we are very keen for them to be a trading
counterparty over the Internet we want a way of showing them what they are
missing.  So we will be sending them a password and login for read only
access.  We could also send out to bodies like regulators or brokers etc but
that will be up to the traders - any counterparties wanting access like this
would apply through th eroute outlined above for new counterparties and we
would authorise readonly access.  We will no be advertising read only access
as available.

They will be able to enter the site for a period for time (Enron needs to be
capable of setting system limits to the amount of time a
customer/counterparty is given read-only access for) unable to transact but
view only.

Procedure
1.  Either, Enron monitors the list of counterparties having registered
against the full counterparty list and notes that specific counterparty has
not registered.  The trading desk with primary trading contact with such
counterparty is contacted and asked if they would like to offer read only
access for a period of time.
or,   a trader applies to the Online Product Control group for read only
access for one of his customers.
2.  The Product Control Group will issue a password/login which will be time
dated (only valid for a certain period).
3. The counterparty will login and immediately greeted by a Read Only ETA  -
these are to be country specific.
4. The counterparty must accept the Read Only ETA online before entering the
site where he has been given READ ONLY access.
5.   Under this scenario there is only one password and no capability of
creating any further passwords (not like a system administrator password).
6. When the password expires they will need a prompt box indicating how they
should register to continue seeing prices.

Elena's issues
1) Should Read Only ETA be printable and where? YES - should be printable
when it appears on screen at login (no need for it to be in the garden)
2) What limitations will be imposed on the Guest User, i.e. one log in
session, limited time etc. - This decision has to be made in order for CC to
put an appropriate language into the Read Only ETA. Read Only ETAs for all
jurisdictions have to be finalised by July 7th. Needs to be flexible although
one password has no capability of creating further passwords, but the period
of time they are allowed access will depend on each trader.  Some customers
may be allowed in for one day others for one month.
3) In the Garden there must be a sentence (to be drafted by CC) to inform
potential Guest User that his request for Read Only access may not be
granted. We will not be advertising this facility and it will therefore not
be mentioned in the garden.  The only phrase in the garden refers to
customers who apply for a password may not get access (see above).
4) Is Read Only ETA accepted online or it should be signed and mailed back to
Enron as a hard copy? The latest agreed was that it will be signed off line,
but accepting it online should work as well, and seems to be a cleaner
way...No this will be signed/clicked online just like the ETAs.

Mark's comments
System administrator will not be a trader as far as the system is concerned.
If they are in reality that is none of our concern.  Agreed - we need to
change the name of System Administrator to Trader Administrator
ETA acceptance process - we have legal confirmation of your comment? I would
expect that all users that trade on the system should read and accept it
(which I think is where Bob is coming from). Only one person per System
Administration Password / Trader Adminstrator password accepts the ETA.

Guest only users
This concept was raised to us for the first time yesterday - and I have some
process queries on it. See above.
How do we separate/ identify the applications? See above.
What will be the process for upgrading users f they successfully apply for
full rights?  They need to receive a notice when their password expires which
prompts them to follow the application process.

2 other queries  -
Why do they need an ETA when they will not be allowed to trade
electronically? Need a Read Only ETA - see document for further understanding
Limitations to be imposed - where is this being coded and who by? There will
be a timetable impact. This is not new and therefore isn't

Bob's comments

1. Existing Enron Customers (approx 2,000)
The first person from the customer's company logging Online has to accept
ETA. After that ETA has to be available for viewing and printing for all
other users.
The first person logging on will always be the Administrator (to set up his
users) so how can a probable non-trading user accept ETAs for his traders?
Probably will be a trader - change the password to TRADER ADMINISTRATOR
PASSWORD/ MASTER TRADING PASSWORD

3. Unknown Customers (currently not trading with Enron) willing to get
Trading Access
Alternative 1 most closely mirrors what we're doing for our existing customer
base and so the procedures will already be in place for EOL Product Control /
System Admin to run this. If the marketing pack mailing method is utilised we
cut down on extra effort in a number of areas (marketing pack will be signed
off by legal, business processes already there, no extra development effort,
single point of reference).
The marketing pack is a glossy brochure advertising our site within it there
will be the registration form, I think we do both alternatives.

Tim's comments

 The process you have described is as I understood things, except
that for Guest Users ( also referred to as Read Only Users - Regulators,
Lawyers, Brokers, Potential Traders etc).  As we discussed on Wednesday and
as Andrew mentioned yesterday, I understood the process to be as follows:

 The Guest will phone or sent e-mail (possibly fill in a form online,
that will be automatically e-mailed) to Enron System Administrator.
Customers will provide info on their name, e-mail address, mailing address,
country of incorporation  etc.   If Enron approves the customer as a Guest
user, the System Administrator will  e-mail/fax to the Guest the Read Only
ETA.  The Guest will execute the Read only ETA in hard copy and return it to
Enron (by fax or post).  Enron will then issue a Guest ID and Password.  The
Read Only ETA will be available on the website as a reminder to the Guest.
This will not be in hard copy it will be online, see above we are not going
to advertise this read only capability.

OK?

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 12:42 PM
---------------------------

"barry crouch" <bcrouch@hotmail.com> on 04/04/2001 03:07:22 PM
To: billnealmd@hotmail.com, chrisn@thisco.com, muddywaters@hubserv.com,
sneal@ect.enron.com, todd.neal@chron.com, sneal12@mindspring.com
cc:
Subject: house

i can;t get my e-mail to go to conrad, so here we go. i have replaced the
window that conrad cloud broke to get in the house. i also washed all the
slip covers, as he had a dog in there with him. i don;t know if he is out of
jail or not at this time, i have not seen him. will continue to keep a close
watch on the house.  barry
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


I was out on vacation last week, so I just now received this.  I'll give it a
look.

Kay

"Miller, Millicent - CHI" <millicent.miller@piperrudnick.com> on 11/21/2000
07:46:33 PM
To: "'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>,
"'rusty.stevens@enron.com'" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>, "'kathleen.carnhan@enron.com'"
<kathleen.carnhan@enron.com>
cc: "Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Titan-Schaffer

 <<Schaffer Letter.DOC>>   <<titan-schaffer memorandum of option.WPD>>
<<REDLINED OPTION TO PURCHASE-SCHFFER.DOC>>   <<Titan-Schaeffer Option.DOC>>

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - Schaffer Letter.DOC
 - titan-schaffer memorandum of option.WPD
 - REDLINED OPTION TO PURCHASE-SCHFFER.DOC
 - Titan-Schaeffer Option.DOC


I have received 2 calls in the last two days from EES and ENA (Lance Hinricks and David Porter) wanting to know the details of AZ electric marketing.  They are apparently revisiting things there.  So here is my reaction to the APS filing, which I had not heard about.

It is my recollection that the spin off is part of the entire-ball-of-wax settlement approved by the ACC for the APS restructuring in 10/99.  Therefore they must have filed to reopen this settlement (which was not to be allowed, of course).  The settlement, while "opening" markets, effectively keeps them closed for lack of headroom until 7/04 at the earliest.  So, if there is a commercial interest in AZ, then this filing could give us a chance to jump back in and make the arguments we made back in 99 that the settlement would not result in competition (and it didn't - time has proved us 100% correct on that) and if APS wants to change the settlement, then the non-competitive terms should be amended as well.

That said, we do not get a great reception in AZ, and it is hard to say we would have any great chance of success.  The large customers do not mind that there is no competition because they have been on a mandated rate reduction path and saw none of the price run-ups that Californians and other westerners saw last winter (at least not yet).  We would have no one on our side.

SO, it is an opening, but I would let the commercial folks tell us how much it is worth to them, given the less than great odds.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Keene, Patrick; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	FW: APS Filing

Is this something in which you think we should be engaged?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Nord, Sue; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

No.  Talk with Pat Keene and/or Leslie Lawner.  We haven't done much on Arizona lately.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	APS Filing

Are we (or EPSA) taking an active role in the filing APS made with the Arizona Commission to use the unregulated affiliate of its parent as the wholesale provider of last resort?  (There's an article on the filing in today's Electric Power Daily that says they've filed to push back the requirement that they purchase 100% of their power from the competitive market by 2004 to a requirement that they purchase 25% of their power competitively by 2008).

Sue Nord
Senior Director
Government Affairs
713-345-4196


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Gas/Power Settlements/Deal Clearing/Volume Mgmt PRC

Date:		6/7/2001
Time:		5:45 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Please print and sign the attached Enron Corp. Risk Management Policy
Certificate of Compliance and fax directly to Veronica Valdez, fax # 713 646
2194. Due to certain regulatory audits of our trading businesses, we would
like to receive these by the end of this week.

Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Compliance, and the Enron Corp. Risk
Management Policy.

If you have any questions, please call me at (713) 853-0429, or Veronica
Valdez at (713) 853-1881.

Regards,
Cassandra Schultz
Market Risk Management


Dawn,

I think I may be on an "immigration" list in houston, but based on the attached forms, it looks like they think i am a non-U.S. citizen residing in the U.S., rather than a U.S. citizen residing in Canada.  Should I get in touch with Karen Buckley?  please advise.

Cooper

-----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Karen
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:54 PM
Subject: Immigration

All,

For those of you who have not met  with UBS's Immigration Counsel, Kumar Kuman, please review the attached checklist and forward to me the relevant information.   Whilst Tindall & Foster  (Enron's Legal Immigration Counsel) will be able to forward most of this required documentation, it would assist with expediting matters if you are able to forward me this information.   My desk location is 3681c.

For those of you who have signed the release forms  (copy attached) your details on file  with Tindall & Foster will be forwarded to Fragomen (UBS Immigration  Counsel) shortly.

Please utilize me as your contact at this point and not the contact names on the checklist until/unless otherwise notified .

Kind Rgds,

Karen

x 54667


When you have a minute, PECO called with an authorized trader list problem
and Liz asked me to bring it to you for handling...


Thanks for the info.  I'll give it a look.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/09/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SWPC Agreement

Kay -

I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've
attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal
standpoint?  Call me with questions.

Thanks,

Mitch


No worries.  I'm not going anywhere.  Focus on you.  If you're body's
reacting poorly, swift action is warranted.  If there's anything I can do to
help, don't hesitate. Hang in there.

Best,
Jeff

	Courtney Abernathy <courtney_abernathy@yahoo.com>
	10/11/2000 11:03 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Thanks Jeff-
I really appreciate the talk and your perspective.
I'm still undecided about school, still need to have
the talk with my contact guy at eLoyalty.  Planning on
that for Friday.  No decisions, lots of open emotional
stuff going on.  I would like to grab lunch or
whatever at some point, but not in the real near
future...I've got to settle my schedule a bit or I'm
going to literally pass out.  My body is reacting to
the abuse quite badly.  Maybe if I get back on the
beach in a week or two!  Anyway-talk to you later and
thanks again-
Courntey
--- Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
>
> Hi.  Hope the ride back to Sacramento went OK last
> nite.  It was nice to
> see you and catch up. I'm sorry things are so crazy,
> but in spite of it
> all, your attitude's pretty good.  And your new
> suede jacket is gorgeous.
>
> I know your life is very complicated and I don't
> want to make it worse, but
> if you ever have the time and inclination to go to
> lunch, dinner, movie,
> whatever, I'd definitely be up for it.  Hang in
> there.  Hope to catch up
> again soon.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
11/01/2000 10:33 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canadian deals in US books.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
10:33 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
11/01/2000 09:22 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry
Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Carrie Coldiron/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Canadian deals in US books.

Just a quick request for you to go into all your books to make sure that
there are no ECC deals booked there.  If there are any that are with
counterparties other than RISKMANTRA, they need to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible.  Invoicing for November should
start today, and both ECC and ENA are held back from invoicing until these
deals are fixed, as the deals will be invoiced by the wrong Enron
counterparty if they aren't.  If you could please let me know when the deals
have been fixed, I can let the accounting department in Houston know when
they can start invoicing as well.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this matter.

Thank you
Stacey


Well, maybe it makes more sense to write it like this:  (see below)

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/22/2001 04:57 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests &
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp.

Well, let's try again then.  How about this (I left off reference to
"States"):

Enron North America Corp. (&ENA8 or the "Protected Party") is prepared to
furnish Northwestern Corp. (&Northwestern8 or the "Receiving Party") with
certain information which is either confidential, proprietary or otherwise
not generally available to the public in connection with the potential sale
of one or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects
and/or one of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects
or project-related assets,  (collectively, the &Projects8) for purposes of
evaluating one or more transactions between Protected Party and Northwestern
involving the Projects (collectively, the &Proposed Transaction8).

K-

Kay Mann
02/22/2001 04:42 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests &
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp.

No biggie, and understandable.  When we sell the equipment we structure it
like we did on the CA deal - we sell the special purpose companies that will
own the equipment at the time of sale.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/22/2001 04:37 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests &
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp.

I will be happy to conform the NW to this form if that is what you want.  In
the form with the paragraph below, I thought "(i) the potential sale of one
or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects and/or one
of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects in [states]"
 was to be used for particular sites where we have existing land options we
are trying to sell, and that when we were trying to sell equipment (i.e.
7EA's) we would refer to these as "gas fired electric generation projects"

My mistake.

Kathleen

Kay Mann
02/22/2001 04:15 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests &
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp.

The form we have has this as the first paragraph, which is different from the
form attached.  Could you conform the NW one to the form?

Enron North America Corp. (&ENA8 or the "Protected Party") is prepared to
furnish [__________________] (&*8 or the "Receiving Party") with certain
information which is either confidential, proprietary or otherwise not
generally available to the public in connection with: (i) the potential sale
of one or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects
and/or one of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects
in [states],  (collectively, the &Projects8) for purposes of evaluating one
or more transactions between Protected Party and   * involving the Projects
(collectively, the &Proposed Transaction8).


Dear All,

I'm on vacation next week -  will be back in the office Monday October 22.

If you have any questions please contact the following:

Outgoing Confirmations - Richard Deming x54886
Incoming Confirmations - Ann Osire x53136
Incoming Confirmations - Mona Calhoun x54741
ENA Upstream Company - Lisa Hesse x54766

Ellen


CALENDAR ENTRY:	EVENT

Description:

Date:		11/13/2000
Duration (days):	1

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


My apologies for inadvertently leaving you off the distribution list.  It was
late when I sent this out...

Additional thoughts that may not have been fully articulated in my first
email and which Mike Roan and I discussed this morning...

To get CSP up to the 20% mark, we could do a preemptive default service deal,
whereby we negotiate to take enough of CSP's customers to get them to the 20%
within a customer class.  The deal could be with commercial or residential
customers.  I don't think we could do much with industrials because the
shopping credit is fairly low.  The shopping credits are as follows:

Residential Non-heat - 5.12
Total Residential - 3.94
Commercial - 5.88, 5.79, 4.06, 3.22 for GS-1, GS-2, GS-3, GS-4 respectively.
Industrial -  3.88, 2.01, 2.71

The customer load by class in CSP's service territory for 2001 as estimated
in AEP's 2000 Longterm Forecast Report is as follows:

Residential - 6,351,000 MWH x 20% = 1,270,000 MWH
Commercial - 6,707,000 MWH x 20% = 1,341,400 MWH
Industrial -        3,241,000 MWH x 20% =    648,000 MWH

The numbers multipled by the 20% switch is the approximation of load that
would have to switch to an alternative supplier to free-up CSP's generation
and get it to market based rates.

Please feel free to provide comments and suggestions.
Janine

	Janine Migden
	04/26/2001 09:33 PM

		 To: Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S
Laipple/DUB/EES@EES, Adam Cooper/DUB/EES@EES, Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES,
John D Burrows/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Decker/HOU/EES@EES, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, (bcc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: AEP - Brainstorming

Below is a concept to perhaps solve the problem confronting EES and the Ohio
market.  It is a work in progress so suggestions and troubleshooting are
welcomed.

Problem - There is uncertainty about EES's ability to pursue what had been
perceived as value propositions in the Columbus Southern Power (AEP) and
Cinergy markets because of changes in our price curves.  These changes
reflect the difficulty of offering a physical product due to concerns
regarding load following and imbalances.

Proposed Solution - Negotiate a power swap with AEP and/or Cinergy.

How the Proposal Works - Under the proposal,  EESI would enter into a
contract with the customer to deliver power below the shopping credit,
thereby offering savings to the customer.  EESI would then enter into a
contract with AEP to provide the power including load following as it
currently does (similar to the market support generation concept).  EESI
could agree to pay AEP a modest sum (a few mils/kwh, for example) as an
incentive to do the deal.   EESI would also enter into a contract with ENA to
procure on- peak and off- peak replacement power for AEP at a cost equal to
or less than the price EESI is charging to its customer, minus a percentage
or millage which would be EESI's profit on the deal.  ENA would contract with
AEP to provide the on-peak and off-peak power in the same quantities as AEP
is providing to EESI  customers.

The term of the deal would be a maximum of five years of until the RTO
adequately addresses load following, whichever comes first. The amount of the
capacity swap could be limited to either a certain megawatt amount or be up
to the amound required to get AEP to its 20%.

Why AEP Might Consider the Deal - Currently, there is no customer switching
in the AEP service territory.  Under SB 3, if less than 20% of the customers
switch by the end of 2003, then the Commission must initiate a proceeding to
address why.  The expected outcome would be to raise the shopping credit,
which probably would not be an outcome AEP would seek.  If no switching
continues to be the issue, the Commission could take action sooner.  Also,
under SB 3, if 20% of customers switch, anytime after mid-2003, any party,
including the utility, can petition the Commission to go to market based
rates and end the market development (transition) period.  It is my belief
that AEP will want to end the market development period as quickly as
possible for two reasons.  First, they have very little stranded generation
assets and will have probably recovered them by some time in 2003.  Their
Regulatory Asset Charge (which is where all there stranded costs really are)
is a surcharge that they will be allowed to recover irrespective of when the
Market Development Period ends.  The most compelling reason for AEP to
consider this proposal is that market prices are high and AEP is unable to
take advantage of market conditions to the degree that they would probably
like because their resources are dedicated to providing default power at low
rates.  This proposal would give them a mechanism to free up generation to
sell in the competitive market and earn a higher return.  Finally, the swap
leaves AEP somewhat indifferent and the millage adder, EESI could add to the
deal is just extra profit for them.

Benefits to EESI - EESI gets to do its deals, make a profit and get a strong
foothold in the Ohio market.  EESI also gets a competitive edge over other
marketers by securing physical capability.  Third, by moving AEP more quickly
to market- based rates, this adds uncertainty in the market which Enron
thrives on.  Fourth, once AEP goes to market-based rates they are required to
conduct a competitive bid for default service.  This could potentially
accelerate by as much as two and  a half years, the opportuntity for an EESI
play as the default service provider.

Benefit to ENA - This provides ENA a large, longterm wholesale transaction.
ENA's profit would be the difference between what EESI pays ENA (as described
above) and the price at which it procures the power.

Benefit to Customers - The customers get the benefit of lower rates and
savings that are measured as the difference between the shopping credit and
the price negotiated with EESI.  They are indifferent as to the source of the
power.

Next Steps - Assuming this looks like an idea that can work, I would set up a
lunch meeting with Rich Munzinski, Senior VP who negotiated the settlements
to explore this concept with him.  Rich is very practical and very
bottom-line oriented.  If he thinks this is good for AEP, he might be willing
to carry the water internally on this.  Judging from several years of
negotiating with him in Ohio and elsewhere, I think there is a reasonable
chance he would be receptive.   I could also arrange a similar meeting with
Jim Gainer, VP, legal counsel for Cinergy in the settlements.  I have a good
relationship with Jim and find him to be practical and straightforward.  If
he thinks this has merit, he will take it up with Jim Turner, president of
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, who I also have a good relationship
with, although not as close.

Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions.
Thank you,
Janine


Notice No. 01- 100
March 21, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
STRIP Code Changes on NYMEX ACCESSc

Currently, the commodity codes CS and NS are used on NYMEX ACCESSc to trade
Cinergy STRIPS and Entergy STRIPs respectively.  These codes are known only
within the NYMEX ACCESSc system.  These codes have been approved to be used
to trade WTI Calendar Swap and SoCal Basis Swap on enymexsm.  As a result,
the NYMEX ACCESSc strip codes will be changed.

The following STRIP code changes will go into effect on Sunday, March 25th
for trade date Monday, March 26th:

Commodity Old STRIP Code New STRIP Code
Cinergy              CS              CE
Entergy              NS              NE

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for further information at
1-800-438-8616.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-100)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I agree.  In fact, in the conversation with the Chairman of PUCT, I told him that we were sending all of our pilot load back to TXU before Jan 1.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wagner, Joseph
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:46 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Hughes, Evan; Gresch, Robert
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Huddleson, Diann; Gresch, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Gahn, Scott
Subject:	DEDASR EVERYONE

Anything or anybody that is pending physical delivery or is being physically delivered to by us needs to be DeDASRed.  We do not want any physical positions in ERCOT, pending or otherwise.  Evan has just called me and let me know that we have Continental Pet Technologies, Owens Corning and Owens Illinois that are either pending or being physically served in addition to the Compaq and JC Penny accounts.  Someone has to have documented information on who has been DASRed by EES to this point.  We don't need meetings to make sure we are straight on this.  Whoever we are showing through internal sources, CSC, or the ISO as being physically deliverd to by EES or any subsidiary of Enron Corp, we need to De DASR them.  DEDASR EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING IN ERCOT.  This point should alleviate any confusion going forward on what needs to be done with our ERCOT customers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Hughes, Evan; Wagner, Joseph
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Huddleson, Diann; Gresch, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Gahn, Scott
Subject:	RE: ERCOT SWITCHES

In speaking to the PUC today, they are under the impression that we are currently physically serving Compaq and JC Penney.  Is this right? If so, don't we want to deDASR them?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hughes, Evan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Wagner, Joseph
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Huddleson, Diann; Gresch, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Delainey, David W.
Subject:	RE: ERCOT SWITCHES

Joe,

Bob G. is implementing what I tell him to DeDASR.  If you need the "green light" to DeDASR...Dave Delainey gives me the final OK and I'll let Bob G. know what next steps need to happen.

FYI -- so far -- I have directed him to DeDASR ERCOT Lockheed and Package Ice only.

Evan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wagner, Joseph
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Hughes, Evan; Herndon, Rogers; Huddleson, Diann; Gresch, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	ERCOT SWITCHES

I talked with Bob Gresch who is doing all over our switches with ERCOT for Lockheed and Packaged Ice.  We need to send him the proper information to DeDASR Owens Corning as well.  We have already given ERCOT the authority to cancel the pending request for Owens, however, we need to send the DeDASR over as well.

Additionally, ERCOT is going to hold a conference call with EES, TXU and ERCOT to walk through the steps for the drop to POLR (TDSP).  I am going to send Bob Gresch's contact info to them for the call.  If anyone else would like to be included on this call, please let me know.  Thanks.

-Joe


BOOK ID    AGG-GASII LOCATION
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-BAS   FT-CANADA-BAS
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-PRC   FT-CANADA-PRC
FT-HPLC-BAS    IM-TEXAS-BAS
FT-HPLC-PRC   IM-TEXAS-PRC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT-GDL  IM-CENTRAL-PHY
FT-US/CAND-ERMS-GDL  FT-CANADA-GDL

Susan D Trevino
11/21/2000 03:51 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy
Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Differences in Portfolio!

Robin - please let me know where to place these books.  Per Bilal, they need
to be done today.

Thanks,
Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Bilal Bajwa
11/21/2000 03:40 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Differences in Portfolio!

I compared the different portfolios in RisktRac and came up with the
following changes. Hopefully this would help eliminate some of the
differences amongst the different portfolios ....

FT-Peoples needs to be removed from P Keavey - Currently it is being double
counted in P Keavey and J Williams.

The following books to be added to AGG-GASII
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-BAS
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-PRC
FT-HPLC-BAS
FT-HPLC-PRC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT-GDL

These books to be added to AGG-GASIV, AGG-GASIII and Canada
FT-US/CAND-ERMS-GDL (Under J_McKay - Robin please confirm)

Please let me know if you have any other suggestions/comments to help solve
this problem as soon as possible.

Bilal


Here's the information I received from Les re: unit contingent deals.
Obviously, we'll still enter the specific unit name in these deals, but this
could be used as a point of reference.

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/02/2001 11:44 AM
---------------------------

Lester Rawson
04/02/2001 11:10 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Unit Contingent Deals

Kate,

Here's the list of current Service's Desk customers we sell as Unit
Contingent. We want to confirm the sales but not the purchases.

Lv Cogen. located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: LV Cogen. unit located in North Las Vegas

Could be sold at Nevada Power system, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Saguaro Power Company located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: Saguaro Power unit located in Henderson Nevada.

Sale Points: Nevada System, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Grays Harbor Paper L.P. located in BPA service territory. Behind Grays Harbor
PUD.

Unit ID: Grays Harbor Paper unit located in Haquiam, WA.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.

Willamette Ind. located in PacifiCorp's service territory.

Unit ID; Willamette Ind. Albany Paper mill, located in Albany, Or.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.

Hope this helps.

Thanks

Les


The Oxford Princeton Programme E-Newsletter
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In this edition:
- 'On-line Exchanges Evolve'
- 2002 Catalog hot off the press
- New industry basics web-based training
 * Introduction to the Power Industry
 * An Overview of the Natural Gas Industry
- The Oxford Princeton Programme course schedules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'On-line Exchanges Evolve'
-------------------------
Entering the new millennium, energy companies are being forced to do business in new ways. Tough environmental legislation, product price sensitivity, mergers and acquisitions, downsizing, supply shortages, and profitability pressures all pose significant challenges to the energy industry as a whole. However, nothing poses more of a challenge than the Internet revolution.
Read the full text of this article by Mary Jackson (as published in Global Energy Business):
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/press/ar0104.asp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2002 Catalog - hot off the press!
------------------------------
Our 2002 Catalog has just been published and is in the mail now. It's never too early to start planning next years training...
...especially as registrations for any 2002 public course made before the end of this year will receive 2001 prices!
Full schedules for 2002 are also available on our website at:
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New industry basics web-based training
** Introduction to the Power Industry **
Electricity is the power we all rely on. Learn how the power gets to you. Meg O'Watt, utility spokesperson, is ready to explain the mysteries of electricity and the basics of the power industry so you'll appreciate what happens when you flip the switch. Join Meg in "Introduction to the Power Industry".
Available NOW:
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/powerindustry.asp
** An Overview of the Natural Gas Industry **
We have a special pass for you to visit The Museum of Natural Gas and see how natural gas is produced and marketed. We've even arranged our top museum guide, Bea T. Yu, to show you through the museum and introduce you to the natural gas industry. There are lots of exciting exhibits that take you from the formation of natural gas through processing and transmission to end-users. See how natural gas is traded in markets around the world.
Available 26 Oct:
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/naturalgas.asp
Read about these courses and see FREE PREVIEWS of all PrincetonLive.com courses at:
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Oxford Princeton Programme Course Schedules
The College of Petroleum and Energy Studies
- Courses in Oxford, Singapore and Houston
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/gold
Princeton Energy Programme
- Courses in Houston, Toronto, Calgary, London,
San Francisco, Singapore, Chicago
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/silver
PrincetonLive.com
- Web-based training, you set your own schedule!
Courses are available 24 hours per day, seven days
per week, worldwide!
http://www.PrincetonLive.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subscription Information
You are receiving this e-mail as a past delegate or
contact of The Oxford Princeton Programme.
If you would rather not receive e-mail updates in the
future or have any other questions please respond to:news@oxfordprinceton.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(c) 2001 The Oxford Princeton Programme
http://www.oxfordprinceton.com


need your mailing address to send golf balls - I received your paypal payment.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:49 AM
To:	'tuanmurray@hotmail.com'
Subject:	Enron Golf Balls auction on EBay

Congratulations on winning the auction on Ebay for the sleeve of Pinnacle Golf Balls.  Please let me know if you will be paying by PayPal(alove@houston.rr.com) or money order/cashier's check.  The total is $15.50.  I will mail the balls priority mail as soon as I receive payment.  Thanks again and use this email address if you reply before this evening, alove@housotn.rr.com is my home email and I can not access it from work.  Thanks again and look forward to hearing from you soon.
PL