i dressed up as a cow with utters and everything.  i walked into sierra and there were only a few people dressed up.  it was so emabarrassing.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i ended up being a bum and studying.  i'm such a loser.
it doesn't sound like i missed much though.
did you dress up?
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >> ]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:11 AM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:
i didn't get your email in time.  my number is 713-807-1699h and
713-825-8410c.  we went to sierra and it sucked.  total banana farm.
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:00 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:
   are you still at work?  if so, call me on my cell phone 281-788-9688.
   i can't find your number.  i don't have it in my new phone.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >> ]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:30 PM
   To: Jilallen
   Subject: RE:
   call me at home if you go out.  i will be home around 7ish.
       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:21 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:
      umpalumpa - i already have that costume. that would be awesome.
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  <<
      File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >> ]
      Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:45 PM
      To: Jilallen
      Subject: RE:
      does that make a nice scent when baby oil and lotion are mixed?  i am
      first
      going to rub fake tan all over and then grease up.  i am just going
   to
      wear
      my new thong and my new gold bracelet.  i am going to look awesome
   when
      i
      am dancing.  i don't know what you should be.  i think you can do
   better
      than gi jane though.  you could be an umpalumpa for willy wonka.
      everyone
      loves those little guys.
          -----Original Message-----
         From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:28 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:
         i don't have any smelly oil, but we can put baby oil all over you
   and
         then put
         some good smelling lotion on top of it.
         what can i be?
         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>
   << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  <<
      File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  <<
         File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >> ]
         Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:02 PM
         To: Jilallen
         Subject: RE:
         that is probably what i will end up doing.  i need to find some
      really
         nice
         smelling oil though.
             -----Original Message-----
            From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>
   @ENRON
            Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:53 AM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:
            They have gay people at LaStada???
            J/K - I'm not sure why they are going there.  They said that
   there
      is
         a
            big
            party tonight.  But I think some people are going to Sierra
   also.
            I was hoping you'd be in your chipendale costume.  :)
            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>
      << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  <<
         File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  <<
            File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >> ]
            Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:30 AM
            To: Jilallen
            Subject: RE:
            the only thing at la strada is a bunch of nancy boys.  are your
         friends
            trying to meet gay guys or are they gay?
                -----Original Message-----
               From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>
      @ENRON
               Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:23 AM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:
               I'll let you know.  Sierra would be fun.
               My roommate and her friends are going to LaStrada....I'm not
      sure
            what
               is going on there.
               We'll have to come up with a costume if we go out.
               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>
         << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  <<
            File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  <<
               File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  << File:
            mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >> ]
               Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:05 AM
               To: Jilallen
               Subject: RE:
               i don't want to be a soilder during the war.  where are you
      going
         if
            you
               go
               out?  sierra?  let me knwo if you decide to go out b/c i
   think
      it
            would
               be
               a fun night.
                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)"
   <jilallen@deloitte.com>
         @ENRON
                  Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:57 AM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:
                  i haven't decided if i'm going out or not either.
                  do you want to borrow my GI Jane outfit?  :)
                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com [
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>
            << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  <<
               File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  << File:
            mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  <<
                  File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  << File:
            mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  << File:
               mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  << File:
            mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >> ]
                  Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:42 AM
                  To: Jilallen
                  Subject: RE:
                  i might go out.  i don't think that i am dressing up.
   are
      you
            going
                  out?
                  i would be up for going out, but i have nothing to dress
   up
      in.
                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)"
      <jilallen@deloitte.com>
            @ENRON
                     Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:08 AM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:
                     what are you doing tonight?  are you dressing up?
                     This message (including any attachments) contains
         confidential
                     information intended for a specific individual and
      purpose,
         and
            is
                     protected by law.  If you are not the intended
   recipient,
         you
               should
                     delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or
         distribution
            of
                  this
                     message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
         strictly
                     prohibited.
   **********************************************************************
                  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
      relevant
               affiliate
                  and may contain confidential and privileged material for
   the
         sole
            use
               of
                  the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
   or
               disclosure
                  by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
      intended
               recipient
                  (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
   contact
         the
               sender
                  or reply to Enron Corp. at
            enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
               and
                  delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
         attachments
                  hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
   acceptance)
      and
         do
            not
                  create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
      between
            Enron
                  Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
   recipient
      or
         any
               other
                  party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of
   a
            contract
               by
                  estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
                  - This message (including any attachments) contains
         confidential
                  information intended for a specific individual and
   purpose,
      and
         is
                  protected by law.  - If you are not the intended
   recipient,
      you
               should
                  delete this message and are hereby notified that any
         disclosure,
                  copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking
   of
      any
            action
                  based on it, is strictly prohibited.
               This message (including any attachments) contains
   confidential
               information intended for a specific individual and purpose,
   and
      is
               protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient,
   you
         should
               delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or
   distribution
      of
            this
               message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
   strictly
               prohibited.
            - This message (including any attachments) contains
   confidential
            information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and
   is
            protected by law.  - If you are not the intended recipient, you
         should
            delete this message and are hereby notified that any
   disclosure,
            copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
      action
            based on it, is strictly prohibited.
         This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
         information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
         protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
   should
         delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of
      this
         message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
         prohibited.
      This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
      information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
      protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
      delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of
   this
      message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
      prohibited.
   This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
   information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
   protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
   delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
   message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
   prohibited.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


CAn you get me the new list

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Buy, Rick; Oxley, David
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Leavers

To confirm:

Mark Thomas
Mike Presley

both previously on the list for Netco's Market Risk/Research Group have resigned.

I'm combing the Estate for replacements.

DP


Kay, make sure Mark knows when you are scheduling these QBR's so that he can
ensure the package is ready - some of these are coming up next week.

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Global Finance

	From:  Bridget Maronge @ ECT                           10/27/2000 02:11 PM

To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: EGF Org Chart


I also heard that Mike Day is working on some thoughts - coordinate with him
please.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/21/2001 09:51 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: bhansen@lhom.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Top 10 QUESTIONS TO CPUC, SoCal Gas, PG&E

FYI:  The City of Long Beach has now joined in the law suits.  They've sued
SoCalGas and El Paso claiming (like the others who've sued) that the two
conspired to "kill competition" and drive up prices.  I think that we can
expect that topic to get some airtime, since the TURN's, Harvey's, UCAN's
etc. of the world will likely be steering all the Democrats.

I'll throw some questions together; but won't be till the end of the day.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	03/20/2001 06:23 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: bhansen@lhom.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Top 10 QUESTIONS TO CPUC, SoCal Gas, PG&E

Jeff --

Can you please develop a list of questions for Legislative members to ask in
the Gas hearing?

I would give the soft ball questions to PG&E and SoCal Gas and focus on the
CPUC as the problems.

Jim


i will be out of town for the game


I haven't heard back form Tom yet, but everyone else is going.
Can you get in touch with him?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

So who all is coming and isn't?  I know Jeff can't make it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'Bass, Eric'
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

That sounds like fun.  The date of the party is January 19, 2002.

Invites

Dad

Scott
smacfarland@gpch.org

Jeff Scott
jayandem@earthlink.net

Brian Lisenby
I will get that one

Ramiro Castano
lqcolombo@aol.com

Tom Fielder
tommybomb88@hotmail.com

Billy Brown
Billy.Brown2@COMPAQ.com

I think that is all.  I will finalize in the next couple of days.

Would you please send me your address?

Thanks,

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [ <mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:35 PM
To: jbass@stdauto.com
Subject: Bachelor Party

<http://www.txtreasure.com/>

what do you think about this.

and you still need to send me a list of invitees (with e-mail)   and the date of the party.

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 08:23 AM
---------------------------

Jackson Logan
10/05/2000 04:57 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron
C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John_biegel@dell.com, bgalligan@mail.utexas.edu,
carey.t.ford@us.arthurandersen.com, jknight@knightrealestate.com,
gkaminski@dttus.com, Brian_Thorp@AIMFUNDS.COM, JAMES.SIVCO@chase.com,
tifftalbot@hotmail.com, jmwooton@yahoo.com, njw4@worldnet.att.net,
KHunter75@aol.com, ttalbot@bmoh.com, RCOLLINS@graubassett.com,
cameron.moates@us.pwcglobal.com, atransou@wsgr.com, onion@pdq.net,
shack4@alumni.utexas.net, ECard10007@aol.com, therter@velaw.com,
ryaf@softchoice.com, Madeofmetal@Sprintmail.Com, LtColby.H@att.net,
Stefanie_Wagenfeld@AIMFUNDS.COM, cshi@dynegy.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: TX/OU

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 04:55
PM ---------------------------

"Tara Talbot" <ttalbot@bmoh.com> on 10/05/2000 03:58:29 PM
To: <Peter_Bourland@adc.com>, <JLewis1342@aol.com>, <jrayb10104@aol.com>,
<rsteel@border.net>, <RMassey@Central.UH.edu>, <JRBridenstine@cs.com>,
<ajohnston@doubleclick.net>, <kevins@emerging.com>, <chad.starnes@enron.com>,
<Jackson.Logan@enron.com>, <christine_petru@gensler.com>,
<ed_cardenas@hotmail.com>, <tifftalbot@hotmail.com>,
<Ashley_Morrison@lotus.com>, <jameslhull@msn.com>, <johnwheeler@pzlqs.com>,
<pkettler@reliantenergy.nl>, <ryaf@softchoice.com>,
<carey.t.ford@us.arthurandersen.com>, <Ronnye.E.Kettler@USA.conoco.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: TX/OU

>>> "knust@ruf.rice.edu" 10/05/00 03:40PM >>>

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Gourley Salomon Smith Barney WATS 800 890-2774
[mailto:gourleyb@swbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:39 AM
To: William Marsh; Zac McCarroll (E-mail); Trey Wadsworth; Susan Burkley;
Stephanie Friedman; Shea Morenz; Ryan Kraudel (E-mail); Ryan Donelson; MIke
Green; matt long; Martin Morgades; Mark Bauman; Luke Belsnnyder; Keith
McPherson; kd_buchanan@yahoo.com; kawise@hotmail.com; JASON HOELSCHER;
Foster Stained Glass; Ed Fisher; dwinfrey01@yahoo.com; David Odom; dave
distephano; cmartinez@houstonnefingrp.nefn.com; Chuck Girard;
chadh@rocketball.com; Carter Perrin; Brandon Calvo; billb@myriad.net;
asebert@utmb.edu; amartinez@lawhbc.com; Alan B. Knust; adam_butler@gsdm.com
Subject: TX/OU

Horns fans, print this off and put on your burnt orange.  Someone sent me
this a year ago, and it still gives me the chills.

Hook 'em

Brian

 - WHATISLONGHORNSPIRIT.DOC


What is the status of your looking at the LNG contract issues?   Mark

	Andrew Edison@ENRON
	01/26/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Williams/ENRON@enronxgate, Jim Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron, Bonnie
White/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric
Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES,
Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, AL
ALEXANDERSON/ENRON@enronxgate, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Limited Partnership

We are considering instituting an arbitration on behalf of Enron Liquid
Fuels, Inc. against Gulf Oil Limited Partnership to recover approximately
$55,000 for due and unpaid fuel oil sales.

If you are aware of any reason legal action should not be brought against
Gulf Oil Limited Partnership, please let me know.  My direct line is
x5-7105.  If I do not hear from you by Tuesday, January 30, I will assume
that you have no objection to Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc. instituting this
arbitration.

Thanks for your assistance.


fyi  - there has been some concern that this deal was being put together
without Connecticut authorities knowing the full extent of our interest in
FCEL.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/24/2000 04:51 PM -----

	David W Delainey@ECT
	09/22/2000 06:32 PM

		 To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: FCEL

Guys, I have spoken to Cliff and Mark and we are comfortable moving forward
under the structure we have discussed.

 FCEL: - $5MM in equity and 1.3MM warrants from corporate treasury stock that
vest based upon 60MW of orders;
  - discussion with FCEL in which we disclose ALL infromation we have about
the potential Conn. deal - I will require that myself and Mark be on   that
call;
  - the transaction is fully press released immediately.

 CRRA: - subject to final due diligence on the development risks, we provide
the management and wrap for CRRA on the potential fuel cell development
opportunity that consists of between 25 and 50 MW;
  - any appropriation of funds from the government will require DPUC hearing
at which we will fully disclose in a factual manner our interest in    FCEL.

I will require that Mark Haedicke manage this process and sign off on all
press releases, term sheets, disclosure discussions, contracts and regulatory
filings.  I believe that we have this managed appropriately as long as we
manage the process as per the script and in a factual manner.

Thanks
Delainey


As mentioned in our floor meeting recently, attached are listings of teams that we are forming to better address the business needs of Enron as it expands both in volume and scope. Supervisors of each RAC sub group provided the names for the groups with the understanding that they may have to be adjusted from time to time. Only the more senior people were included, but others will be included as appropriate. Many will have to be multidimensional. There will be no formal leader of the teams because each member is responsible for the activities of the team, regardless of the RAC group that you are in. Following are several thoughts concerning this process for consideration.

-	The purpose of this exercise is to better serve the customer, the commercial business units and achieve this within our control framework.
-	Ancillary benefits include cross training of RAC employees and heightened awareness of RAC issues. "De-silo-ization" .
-	All existing reporting relationships remain unchanged, for the moment.
-	Successful implementation of this effort will require a positive attitude among the teams.
-	Existing RAC responsibilities remain in effect.
- 	Teams should meet weekly, at least, to discuss issues. Transactions will require more frequent informal meetings.
-	There are no excuses for forgetting to consider the impact on a deal of credit, market risk or our portfolio.
-	All team members are responsible for all aspects of a transaction. Offer to help out if needed.
-	If formal cross-training is necessary, force it to happen.
-	Encourage weak links in team to perform.
-	Each quarter RAC management will conduct portfolio reviews of the business unit with the team present. This may take one quarter to implement.
-	If it makes sense to sit together for logistical reasons try to arrange it with your supervisor.
-	Individual performance on the teams will be strongly considered in the PRC and compensation processes.

The existing EES team has been quite successful and in large part was a catalyst to the recent reorganization there. You can have an impact.

This process should begin immediately.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation in this effort.

Rick


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Richter
12/07/2000 06:31 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 08:38
AM ---------------------------

Carla Hoffman
12/07/2000 06:19 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/07/2000 06:29
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/07/2000 06:11 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

13:18 GMT 7 December 2000 DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts
Wed -Sources
(This article was originally published Wednesday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Independent System Operator paid
about $10 million Wednesday for 1,000 megawatts of power from Powerex and
still faced a massive deficit that threatened electricity reliability in the
state, high-ranking market sources familiar with the ISO's operation told
Dow Jones Newswires.
But the ISO fell short of ordering rolling blackouts Wednesday for the third
consecutive day.
The ISO wouldn't comment on the transactions, saying it is sensitive market
information. But sources said Powerex, a subsidiary of British Columbia
Hydro & Power Authority (X.BCH), is the only energy company in the Northwest
region with an abundant supply of electricity to spare and the ISO paid
about $900 a megawatt-hour from the early afternoon through the evening.
But that still wasn't enough juice.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power sold the ISO 1,200 megawatts
of power later in the day at the wholesale electricity price cap rate of
$250/MWh. The LADWP, which is not governed by the ISO, needs 3,800 megawatts
of power to serve its customers. It is free sell power instate above the
$250/MWh price cap.
The LADWP has been very vocal about the amount of power it has to spare. The
municipal utility has also reaped huge profits by selling its excess power
into the grid when supply is tight and prices are high. However, the LADWP
is named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit alleging price gouging. The suit
claims the LADWP sells some of its power it gets from the federal Bonneville
Power Administration, which sells hydropower at cheap rates, back into the
market at prices 10 times higher.
Powerex officials wouldn't comment on the ISO power sale, saying all
transactions are proprietary. But the company also sold the ISO 1,000
megawatts Tuesday - minutes before the ISO was to declare rolling blackouts
- for $1,100 a megawatt-hour, market sources said.
The ISO, whose main job is to keep electricity flowing throughout the state
no matter what the cost, started the day with a stage-two power emergency,
which means its operating reserves fell to less than 5%. The ISO is having
to compete with investor-owned utilities in the Northwest that are willing
to pay higher prices for power in a region where there are no price caps.
The ISO warned federal regulators, generators and utilities Wednesday during
a conference call that it would call a stage-three power emergency
Wednesday, but wouldn't order rolling blackouts. A stage three is declared
when the ISO's operating reserves fall to less than 1.5% and power is
interrupted on a statewide basis to keep the grid from collapsing.
But ISO spokesman Patrick Dorinson said it would call a stage three only as
a means of attracting additional electricity resources.
"In order to line up (more power) we have to be in a dire situation,"
Dorinson said.
Edison International unit (EIX) Southern California Edison, Sempra Energy
unit (SRE) San Diego Gas & Electric, PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas &
Electric and several municipal utilities in the state will share the cost of
the high-priced power.
SoCal Edison and PG&E are facing a debt of more than $6 billion due to high
wholesale electricity costs. The utilities debt this week could grow by
nearly $1 billion, analysts said. It's still unclear whether retail
customers will be forced to pay for the debt through higher electricity
rates or if companies will absorb the costs.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1318GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:17 GMT 7 December 2000 DJ Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay
Pwr Plant
(This article was originally published Wednesday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Representatives of the California Independent
System Operator and Public Utilities Commission inspected Duke Energy
Corp.'s (DUK) off-line 700-MW South Bay Power Plant in Chula Vista, Calif.,
Wednesday morning, a Duke spokesman said.
The ISO and PUC have been inspecting all off-line power plants in the state
since Tuesday evening to verify that those plants are shut down for the
reasons generators say they are, ISO spokesman Pat Dorinson said.
About 11,000 MW of power has been off the state's power grid since Monday,
7,000 MW of which is off-line for unplanned maintenance, according to the
ISO.
The ISO manages grid reliability.
As previously reported, the ISO told utilities and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Wednesday that it would call a stage three power alert
at 5 PM PST (0100 GMT Thursday), meaning power reserves in the state would
dip below 1.5% and rolling blackouts could be implemented to avoid grid
collapse. However, the ISO said the action wouldn't result in rolling
blackouts.
The ISO and PUC also inspected Tuesday plants owned by Dynegy Inc (DYN),
Reliant Energy Inc. (REI) and Southern Energy Inc (SOE).
Duke's 1,500-MW Moss Landing plant was also inspected by PUC representatives
in June, when some units were off-line for repairs, the Duke spokesman said.

   -By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1317GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:17 GMT 7 December 2000 =DJ Calif Regulators Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line
Power Plants
(This article was originally published Wednesday)

   By Jessica Berthold
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--AES Corp. (AES) and Dynegy Inc. (DYN) said
Wednesday that representatives of California power officials had stopped by
some of their power plants to verify that they were off line for legitimate
reasons.
The California Independent System Operator, which manages the state's power
grid and one of its wholesale power markets, and the California Public
Utilities Commission began on-site inspections Tuesday night of all power
plants in the state reporting that unplanned outages have forced shutdowns,
ISO spokesman Pat Dorinson said.
The state has had 11,000 MW off the grid since Monday, 7,000 MW for
unplanned maintenance. The ISO Wednesday called a Stage 2 power emergency
for the third consecutive day, meaning power reserves were below 5% and
customers who agreed to cut power in exchange for reduced rates may be
called on to do so.
As reported earlier, Reliant Energy (REI) and Southern Energy Inc. (SOE)
said they had been visited by representatives of the ISO and PUC Tuesday
evening.
Representatives of the two organizations also visited plants owned by AES
and Dynegy Tuesday evening.
AES told the visitors they couldn't perform an unannounced full inspection
of the company's 450-megawatt Huntington Beach power station until Wednesday
morning, when the plant's full staff would be present, AES spokesman Aaron
Thomas said.
Thomas, as well as an ISO spokesman, didn't know whether the representatives
returned Wednesday for a full inspection.

   AES Units Down Due To Expired Emissions Credits

The Huntington Beach facility and units at two other AES facilities have
used up their nitrogen oxide, or NOx, emission credits. They were taken down
two weeks ago in response to a request by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District to stay off line until emissions controls are deployed,
Thomas said.
AES has about 2,000 MW, or half its maximum output, off line. The entire
Huntington plant is off line, as is 1,500 MW worth of units at its Alamitos
and Redondo Beach plants.
The ISO has asked AES to return its off line plants to operations, but AES
has refused because it is concerned the air quality district will fine the
company $20 million for polluting.
"We'd be happy to put our units back, provided we don't get sued for it,"
Thomas said. "It's not clear to us that the ISO trumps the air quality
district's" authority.
As reported, a spokesman for the air quality district said Tuesday that AES
could have elected to buy more emission credits so that it could run its off
line plants in case of power emergencies, but choose not to do so.

   Dynegy's El Segundo Plant Also Visited By PUC

Dynegy Inc. (DYN) said the PUC visited its 1,200 MW El Segundo plant Tuesday
evening, where two of the four units, about 600 MW worth, were off line
Wednesday.
"I guess our position is, 'Gee, we're sorry you don't believe us, but if you
need to come and take a look for yourself, that's fine,'" said Dynegy
spokesman Lynn Lednicky.
Lednicky said one of the two units was off line for planned maintenance and
the other for unplanned maintenance on boiler feedwater pumps, which could
pose a safety hazard if not repaired.
"We've been doing all we can to get back in service," Lednicky said. "We
even paid to have some specialized equipment expedited."
Lednicky added that the PUC seemed satisfied with Dynegy's explanation of
why its units were off line.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872,
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1317GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


I have a heavy meeting/conference call schedule.  To be honest with you, I'm
a bit unclear on who is doing what with this.  Any advice/insight?

Kay

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/23/2000 01:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM
CDT)

Yeh, finally figured it out. I am trying to get out of town tomorrow, and
this is on top of some other hurry-up stuff, so I will likely miss. Scotty
will be there. Any chance youguys cna talk and geton the same page, or define
differences, before then?

To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

Couldn't tell if you saw this...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

John.Normand@enron.com@enron.com on 08/23/2000 11:47:29 AM
Sent by: Arlene.Chapman@enron.com
To: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Bob.Greene@enron.com,
Dennis.Alexander@enron.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com,
Mark.Dobler@enron.com, Ross.Newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

  (superscript: New meeting request from John Normand)

                08/24/2000 12:30 PM Local Time
                08/24/2000 02:00 PM Local Time

  Title:        Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served
  (J.Normand, M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene,
  D.Alexander, B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))
  Location:     -No room information available-

  Chair:        John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

  To (required):   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
  cc (optional):

     John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT wants you to attend a meeting.

On        08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT
For       1 hour 30 minutes
With:          John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Chairperson)
          Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          Kay Mann/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Mark Dobler/NA/Enron (Invited)
          Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)

   Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served (J.Normand,
M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene, D.Alexander,
B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
05:04 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
12/07/2000 05:02 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 05:01 PM
---------------------------

japearson@duke-energy.com on 12/07/2000 12:31:06 PM
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
cc: dthudson@duke-energy.com, mhhurtado@duke-energy.com, don.miller@enron.com
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

Stuart - At Dan Hudson's request, I am forwarding a redlined version of the
referenced agreement.  The attached is marked against the last version of
the PSA submitted by DENA to Enron.  Please call if any questions.  Thanks.
Jane Pearson, 713/627-5318.  Jane

(See attached file: enronpsared.doc)
 - enronpsared.doc


There were no changes this week to Enron Transporation Services Company's
Weekly Report.


Steve, I sent the following document earlier today.  I hope it got there on
time for Rick Perry's meeting with Juan Hern?ndez.

I am sorry I did not copy before.

Best,

Ricardo
---------------------- Forwarded by Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron on 08/17/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------
To: Rickp@fc.net
cc:
Subject: Mexico Profile

Dear Mr. Perry,

At the request of Steve Kean, I am sending you a profile on Mexico which I
hope you find useful.

Best regards,

Ricardo Charvel
Sr. Director
Government Affairs
Mexico


I think a key point is that the California legislature and CPUC implicitly
put themselves in the position as "procurement managers" for California
consumers.  They did this in two  ways:
Forced utilities to go short by selling a minimum of 50% of their thermal
generation (the utilities chose to sell more and the CPUC approved it).
Steve Peace and many California politicians claimed that they sold these
assets at ridiculously high prices.
Required utilities to buy all of their needs (at least at first, then most of
their needs when the Block Forward Market opened) from the spot market.  They
explicitly chose to take a huge short position into the spot market every day.

These two basic facts led to a variety of unintended consequences:
Utilities had no incentive, in fact would have to be irrational risk seekers,
to purchase forward.  All activitiy measured against peak index (same problem
plagues their gas market).  After the summer of 1999 when utilities made
modest Block Forward purchases at prices higher than the spot market
liquidated the CPUC played Monday morning quarterback and threatened prudency
review.
Huge spot market purchasing requirement causes utilities to take large short
positions into real time, creating reliability problems.
Lack of forward buying signals dampened the asset developement efforts.
Developers looked at low spot prices in 1998 and 1999 and invested capital
elsewhere in the country (e.g., Enron's peaking plants).  Meanwhile
tremendous demand existed, but was masked by years of strong hydro and a
summer of mild weather.  In 2000 when the demand showed up, it was too late.
Had utilities tried to hedge forward, the forward price would have move up
modestly, causing increased investment in generation.  With reasonable siting
rules and forward purchasing by the utilities we could have built significant
generation to meet the 2001 summer season.
Fundamental shortage combined with huge spot market demand caused prices in
California, and the rest of the west, to increase.

California didn't deregulate, they made a strategic bet to go short!  Once
they made this strategic bet, they "fired" the traditional portfolio manager
-- the utilities -- and hired the CalPX spot market to meet all of their
needs.  They then let the ship sail with nobody at the helm.  Deregulation
didn't fail; the State of California has simply proven to be a horribly
irresponsible portfolio manager.

Other versions of a true deregulated market can work.  Protection for small
consumers can be achieved by establishing a default provider or specifying a
portfolio approach.  Asset divestitures can work with a contract from the
buyer guaranteeing supply for a few years (this is what happened in MT which
is why industrial customers are hurting there and small customers have been
protected by a 3 year purchase contract).


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007876&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007876
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 11/20/00 2:36:29 PM
Requested For       : stewart.range@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


At this time, we are not having an Excel Intro class during the below week...if you would like to learn it on your own, I can send you the book and exercise files that are given in class.

Let me know if you would like that.

Maggie
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Traylor, Donnis
Sent:	Thursday, September  20, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Cruz, Magdelena; Presas, Gracie S.
Subject:	FW: Excel Class

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Dana
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	ISC Registrar
Subject:	Excel Class

I was wondering if there would be an Intro Excel class anytime during the week of Oct. 8 - 12th.


Do you happen to know Gretchen Jennings?  How long do you suggest I wait to
call her?  I don't believe in waiting too long.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: COORD ADMIN

>
> You are the one!  I hope everything works out, keep me posted and let me
> know if there's anything I can do to help!
>
>


FYI, John Bryson is on the board of the LA Times.

Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/10/2000 02:55 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul Kaufman@ECT,
Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D Steffes@EES,
Steven J Kean@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie
Mandelker@ECT, filuntz@aol.com
cc:

Subject: California Power Issue

Following is an excerpt from a LA Times article illustrating a different,
more negative point of view concerning deregulation compared to earlier
articles I had sent.
The whole article is attached at the bottom.

Overconfident lawmakers even inserted as Section 330A of the Public Utilities
Code: "It is the intent of the Legislature that a cumulative
rate reduction of at least 20% be achieved not later than April 1, 2002, for
residential and small commercial customers from the rates
 in effect on June 10, 1996."

Fat chance! And under deregulation, with production of electricity in
independent hands, separated from the major utilities,
 there is a division of responsibility: When things go wrong, it is nearly
impossible to assess whom to blame.

So where do we go from here?

Already, while ostensibly resisting re-regulation, utility officials are
suggesting they need help. This is not surprising. Deregulation
 is one of the most oversold concepts in American life. Without a continued
government hand, things frequently run off the tracks.

When John E. Bryson, chief of Edison, came last week to The Times to meet
with reporters and editorial writers, he expressed
mystification that market prices have been so high, even at times when demand
is relatively low.

He called for a federal investigation of the price levels.

In the meantime, he and aides suggested, some price ceilings might be
temporarily
in order.

I suspect they might not be all that temporary.

If after joining in a $40-million utilities campaign to defeat a quixotic
ballot initiative that would have stifled
 deregulation, Edison leaders are now proposing so much regulation, it shows
not only a commendable candor but also
how grim they realize the immediate prospects are.


Mitch,

Here's a first draft.  Please suggest any additional complaints/shortfalls
which we need to raise.  It is better to be all inclusive than leave
something out.

Richard, any ideas or comments?

Kay


Attached is the February 18 Significant Events report from the Regulatory
Affairs department.

Rubena


Notice No.  01-161
May 10, 2001

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Approved Amendments to the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract.

NOTE:
Entire notice available at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_161.pdf

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (&CFTC8) to amend the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract. The approved amendments update the addresses and telephone
numbers of the service providers to these contracts.

The approved amendments are effective immediately.

A copy of the approved amendment can be found at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_161.pdf.  Underlining
indicates additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608 or Ploumi Efkarpidis at 212-299-2334.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-161)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I have arranged for the phone bridge for the meeting referenced.

We only have 2 lines for the call.

Both the Portland and San Francisco office should dial: 804/225-4063 to join
the call.

In Portland we have reserved the Cascade conference room to take the call.

The meeting begins at 6:00am Pacific Time.

Attached is the Panel list.

Lysa Akin
503/464-7927
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/08/2000 03:23 PM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
11/07/2000 08:48 AM
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FYI

I guess we would like the phone bridge for this.  Please find out how much it
costs per line.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 08:56 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
11/07/2000 08:09 AM

To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FYI

November 9, 2000:  The Capitol Connection will broadcast via the Internet &
Phone Bridge of the FERC Conference  on November 9, 2000 from 9:00 am - 5:00
pm ET.  PLEASE NOTE:  The video feed will change to AUDIO ONLY starting at
3:15 pm until the conclusion of the meeting, due to circumstances beyond our
control.


Thanks Kate!  i just faxed that list of daily deals that need to be changed.
Please let me know if you don't receive it!
Kim

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/26/2001 10:04 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: City of Riverside #552518

It's been changed. Thanks!

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
03/26/2001 07:25 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: City of Riverside #552518

Hi Kate!
This deal needs to be changed to CAISO energy.  Also, I will be faxing the
list of West Daily Deals that need to be changed to "no confirm".
Thanks for your help!
Kim


Hey dude ,,,,, I actually just got back to work today.. had a 8 lb baby boy!

Actually not going to the game this wk end because of the new tike.....
don't actually know my schedule for the game but let me know what you are
doing ......  Also ,,, we do need to go to dinner sometime as well

MC


Andy:
Just checking on the options.  Any idea on rollout date?
John


yes

	"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
	10/31/2000 01:14 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: E-mail attachments

Did the footnote appear?

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 1:59 PM
To: ctetrault@velaw.com
Subject: Re: E-mail attachments

The attachment opened

                    "Tetrault,

                    Charles D."          To:     "Richard B. Sanders
(E-mail)" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
                    <ctetrault@ve        cc:

                    law.com>             Subject:     E-mail attachments

                    10/31/2000

                    12:33 PM

This is the "homework" that I mentioned.  We are trying to resolve our
"attachment" problem.  Can you open the test attachment that accompanies
this e-mail?

Charles D. Tetrault
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1008
ctetrault@velaw.com
202.639.6551 [voice]
202.639.6604 [fax]

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

(See attached file: DC_110685_1.DOC)

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Everything went ok - the following 21 deals have an invalid counterparty, and
so errored out during the move from NG-PRICE to NG-PR-OPT. Please change the
counterparty code to a valid one:
;
EH4013.1
N06657.1
NA8234.1
NB0716.1
NF6752.1
NF6752.2
NI9844.1
NI9849.1
NK1130.1
NM0745.1
NM0751.1
NM0760.1
Q16262.1
Q16404.1
Q40242.1
Q49752.1
Q51902.1
Q51910.1
Q56703.1
QQ8923.1
QQ8924.1
;
Thanks,
Jeremy


Updated questions and answers for Enron employees have just been posted to http://home.enron.com/updates/qa.html
We recognize that as active employees you have special concerns and questions related to Enron's bankruptcy filing.  We regret that we are not able to answer all of your questions as quickly as you deserve, but we are working to provide accurate responses to your most important questions about employee benefits, expense payments and so on.  We appreciate your patience as we continue to try to provide timely and reliable information to you.


I would like to be able to run "Facilitation By Location" with the following
criteria
1.  I want to pick the counterparty or leave it blank.
2.  I want to enter a date range ==> 02/01/2001 to 02/11/2001
3.  I want to be able to select one or more pipelines without choosing a desk.

	From:  Katherine L Kelly                           02/26/2001 03:55 PM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: CPR reports

Ok, looks like we got some attention.  Please let me know which ones you
think and I'll consolidate and forward to Felicia.
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
03:53 PM ---------------------------
From: Felicia Ma/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/26/2001 03:02 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry Sanvido/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: RE: CPR reports

Katherine,

Could you give me a list of reports you need on a particular pipe regardless
of desks?

Thanks,
Felicia

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sanvido, Terry
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Ma, Felicia
Subject: FW: CPR reports

Felicia,

Would you please look into this.

Thank You,

Terry

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kelly, Katherine
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Sanvido, Terry
Cc: Lamadrid, Victor; Beaty, Beverly; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Junek,
Dan; Townsend, Judy
Subject: CPR reports

Terry,

Unless I'm missing something, it does not appear that there is a way for us
to run a CPR report that shows all business done on a particular pipe
regardless of desks.  For example, if I want to see all business that is
being done on Transco, I must run the report for both the Northeast desk and
the Market East desk.  This next weekend, the east is to be split into 12
different desks, which will only complicate the issue even more.

Russ Severson has the position screen set so that all business will roll into
one position manager.  Is there any way that we get something similar from
the reporting environment.  I'm thinking that the easiest way might be to
have the ability to select just a pipe without being forced to select a desk
first when submitting a report.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.

Thanks!

Kathy


Hi Jeff.
Here is a scan of the big Rovner piece you were looking at for the
office.
Sincerely,
Thom Andriola

 - Rovner Shayara III.jpg


John Wayne at his spookiest.  4 stars.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:39 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

Yes.  As I have said before, I can take mom and dad only in small doses.
They fight too much for me.

We went home and watched The Searchers.  I had never seen it.  It was
great!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Cameron Sellers
Subject:	RE:

Yeah.  Ask me how happy I am to be back at work, with a midterm in
finance tomorrow nite. Sigh...

Tried to call you guys yesterday to see if you wanted to stop by your
folks to have abalone, but only got your voicemail.  I'm sure you were
glad just to get home and relax.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

I thought the whole weekend was a total blast.  It was great having both
of
you there!!  I think every one had a very good time. There is no
possible
way that we could have done anything more in one weekend.  Pumpkin
carving,
abalone, piano roles, bluegrass, good meals, monopoly, scrabble and then
the
most incredible weather I have ever had up there!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	cameron@perfect.com
Subject:

It was really fun.  Thanks so much for inviting us.  It was great to get
to play together.  I'll get Scott a check for our share of the goodies.
Thanks again.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


This email is to let you know that the October 2001 version of NEWGen is
available for download on www.rdionline.com.  If you do not want to receive
this email please reply with unsubscribe me as the subject line.

Thank You,

The NEWGen Staff


Kimberly:

Attached is a blacklined draft of the confirmation marked to show the proposed changes that Frank Sayre and Mark Taylor made.  If you have any questions, please call Frank at 57894.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Subject:	GE Asian Options Deal #705475

Please find attached a confirmation for this deal ("sampledoc").  I have changed the floating price language to reflect an Asian option (which I have never confirmed before), as opposed to our standard European options.  The standard floating price language for European Options is as follows:

The average of the hourly day-ahead prices as published by the New York Independent System Operator (the "NYISO") on the last day of the month that includes the applicable Determination Period on the NYISO's official web site currently located at http://mis.nyiso.com/public/index.html, or any successor thereto, under the headings "Day Ahead Market LBMP - Zonal; Zonal Prices; West (61757) (Zone F)" for electricity during the applicable Determination Period.

Please review the "Floating Price" section of this confirmation letter.

 << File: sampledoc.doc >>
Please let me know if this confirmation correctly reflects an Asian option.  The trader would like for this confirmation to go out no later than today.  Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank You,
Kimberly Hundl (x31647)


Kristin,

Yes, we would like very much to have her as a summer intern.
I can take her ino my group.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Gandy @ ENRON                           01/26/2001 04:03 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Vince,

Can you tell me if these candidates will be part of the program?  I will
generate an offer letter as soon as I know this information.

Thank you,

kristin

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Kristin.

Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission

Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
 - Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
 - Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc


-____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline

**********************************************************************
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The
eDirect Network. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the
products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe
please copy and paste the following link into your web browser or
click here. http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com
**********************************************************************

Dear PATRICE,

How does it feel to get 4 Free Airline Tickets?

Consider yourself lucky!  You are receiving an email that entitles you to
4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS.  No kidding! This is not a joke.  DO NOT DELETE
THIS EMAIL...you really can get 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS!

Click the link below for details:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=305726085&m=2111010&c=811

In addition to 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS, through a special arrangement with
Preferred Traveller  we are also giving you a FREE 30-day trial membership
to their Preferred  Traveller Club - If you do a lot of traveling or just
once a year, this service will save you money!  Even if you don't want to
take advantage of the savings that being an
active member offers, you still get to keep the airline tickets.
It's no wonder this has been called the BEST DEAL on the Web! Check it out -
you deserve a FREE vacation, don't you?

Click on the link or paste it into your browser:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=305726085&m=2111010&c=811

So, what are you waiting for? This is a limited time offer, so be
a winner and claim your 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS.

Click on the link below or paste it into your browser!
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=305726085&m=2111010&c=811

This e-mail message may be a recurring mailing.

--____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline

<TITLE>4 FREE Airline Tickets</TITLE>

The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The eDirectNetwork. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please click on the following link or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com.

Dear PATRICE,

How does it feel to get 4 Free Airline Tickets?

Consider yourself lucky!  You are receiving an email that entitles you to
4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS.  No kidding! This is not a joke.  DO NOT DELETE THIS EMAIL... you really can get 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS!

Click here for details.

In addition to 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS, through a special arrangement with Preferred Traveller  we are also giving you a FREE 30-day trial membership to their Preferred  Traveller Club - If you do a lot of traveling or just once a year, this service will save you money!  Even if you don't want to take advantage of the savings that being an
active member offers, you still get to keep the airline tickets.
It's no wonder this has been called the BEST DEAL on the
web!
Check it out - you deserve a FREE vacation, don't you?

Click here now!

So, what are you waiting for? This is a limited time offer, so be
a winner and claim your 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS.
Click here now!

This e-mail message may be a recurring mailing.

--____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____--


Ben,
Thanks for your email.  I have highlighted the pertinent Sections 2.2 and 2.3
of the Project Development Agreement to the bottom of this email for your
review .  So long as we extend the May 1, 2001 date to August 1, 2001
regarding Purchaser's obligations, I think many of your concerns are
adequately covered by these Sections.  This was a big concern of Healy's when
we did the deal initially and we tried to make it clear that, despite a sale
of the Interests to AES prior to the deadline for meeting the Development
Milestones, Developer (ENA) would remain the exclusive developer of the
Property as long as the PDA was in effect.

Regarding indemnities, in Section 6.11, Purchaser agrees to indemnify
Developer and Developer's related parties from all damages caused by
Purchaser's nonfulfillment of any agreement or covenant under the PDA.  Thus,
if they breach the obligations listed below, they are liable to us for
damages related to such breach.

Please call me at your convenience to discuss this issue at your
convenience.  Best regards.

SECTION 2.2 Obligations of Purchaser.
Purchaser shall have the following obligations under this Project Development
Agreement:
(a) Purchaser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with
Developer in achieving the Development Milestones on or before [May 1, 2001];
(b) Purchaser shall pay to Developer all payments owing by Purchaser to
Developer in accordance with Article III below, as and when such payments are
due;
(c) Purchaser agrees to provide on or before fifteen (15) days after the
Effective Date the Base Configuration Information;
(d) following Purchaser's submission to Developer of the Base Configuration
Information, Purchaser hereby agrees not to change any of the information
contained in the Base Configuration Information in any manner that could, in
Developer's reasonable judgment, adversely affect Developer's ability to
achieve the Development Milestones;
(e) Purchaser agrees (i) not to take any action that is reasonably likely to
hinder, impede or delay Developer's achievement of the Development Milestones
or that could make Developer's achievement of such Development Milestones
more costly and (ii) to use commercially reasonable efforts to promptly
supply to Developer follow-up information that is consistent with the Base
Configuration Information which is reasonably requested by Developer (or any
Governmental Authority) in connection with Developer's pursuit of the
Development Milestones;
(f) Purchaser recognizes that, except as otherwise provided in Section 3.7,
Developer is the exclusive developer of the Project; provided, that Developer
agrees to include representatives of Purchaser in all material meetings and
discussions with third parties related to the development of the Project,
including all material discussions and meetings with respect to the TVA
Interconnection Agreement and related matters.
(g) in the event Purchaser purchases the Interests prior to the termination
of this Project Development Agreement, all of Purchaser's obligations
pursuant to this Project Development Agreement (including 2.2(f)) shall
continue in full force and effect and Purchaser agrees to cause the Company
(and any subsequent purchasers and assignees of the Company) to comply with
all restrictions set forth in this Section 2.2(e)-(f) as if the Company
(including any subsequent purchaser or assignee) and the Purchaser were the
same entity.

SECTION 2.3 Miscellaneous.
(a) Notwithstanding Section 2.2(f) above but specifically subject to Section
2.2(e), (i) following Purchaser's purchase of the Interests, Purchaser may
hold itself out as the "owner" of the Interests so long as Purchaser does so
in a manner that does not adversely affect Developer's ability to achieve the
Development Milestones and (ii) prior to Purchaser's purchasing of the
Interests, Purchaser may have direct contact with Purchaser Contact Parties
as reasonably necessary in connection with the Project so long as (x) prior
to any such contact each Purchaser Contact Party has executed a
confidentiality agreement in a form reasonably approved by Developer and (y)
all such contacts and any agreements with any Purchaser Contact Party are
made by Purchaser only on behalf of Purchaser (and specifically not the
Company or Developer).
(b) Notwithstanding anything stated herein to the contrary, Purchaser agrees
not to enter into any agreement with any third party on behalf of the Company
or otherwise bind the Company without the prior written consent of Developer
which may be granted or withheld by Developer in its sole discretion.
Purchaser agrees to defend and indemnify Developer and the Company against
any Damages suffered by Developer or the Company related to any agreement or
alleged agreement entered into between the Company and any third party in
violation of this Section 2.3(b). The indemnification described in the
previous sentence shall expressly survive the termination of this Project
Development Agreement.
(c) Purchaser agrees that all information it provides to Developer or any
third party in connection with the Haywood Site, the Project, or the Company
(i.e. information provided to regulatory authorities regarding air permit
related matters) will be factually correct in all material respects.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

>>> <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com> 05/01/01 07:24PM >>>

Aaron:

It is highly likely that AES would exercise their early purchase option in
May. As such, I want to make sure we are thinking about the duties,
obligations, and indemnities among the parties under the circumstance that
AES owns the member interests in Haywood, and ENA is continuing its efforts
to achieve the milestone of the interconnection agreement through August 1.
I also want to make sure we have adequate indemnities from AES regarding
actions we will undertake to achieve the interconnection milestone. At the
end of the day, ENA will be focused on two things: (i) causing TVA to lower
its Network Upgrade estimate from the current level of $4.8 million, and
(ii) causing TVA to produce an interconnection agreement in substantially
the same form as the Gleason interconnect agreement. Obviously, with AES
owning the Haywood member interests and being in the driver's seat, they
will play a key role in whether these two items are achieved. I want to
make sure that the same standards which applied to us prior to them
exercising their early option (i.e. we were on the hook to use reasonable
commercial efforts to achieve the milestones) now applies to them during
the period that we are still trying to achieve the milestones.

With Stuart's concurrence, I'd like you to further review the documents and
make a recommendation as to what other changes, if any, we should make, to
protect our upside under the circumstance described above.

Thanks,

Ben

"Aaron Roffwarg" <aroffwarg@bracepatt.com> on 05/01/2001 06:49:19 PM

To:   <ben.jacoby@enron.com>, <stuart.zisman@enron.com>
cc:   <Chris.Booth@enron.com>, <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
Subject:  Greystone/Haywood - Extension of Dates

Ben and Stuart,

Attached is Amendment #2 to the SPA reflecting the business terms Ben and I
discussed this afternoon.  As you will see this structure (with the
promissory note) is different from the structure described by Steve Hase in
the attached email.  Please let me know if the deal has evolved since our
latest discussions.  Please note that this is being sent to ENA only.
Please call me with your comments at your earliest convenience.  Best
regards.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com      by bracepatt.com; Tue, 01 May 2001
15:29:24 -0500
Received: FROM aesc.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Tue May 01 15:40:09 2001
-0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from 207.92.93.17 ([207.92.93.2]) by aesc.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1);      Tue, 1 May 2001 16:22:53 -0400
Message-id: <fc.000f749c00763c4c3b9aca0044810ab2.763dd3@aesc.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:32:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Greystone/Haywood - Extension of Dates
To: ALouison@hunton.com
Cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com, stuart.zisman@enron.com, aroffwarg@bracepatt.com,
prollin@aesc.com, mbarr@hunton.com
From: "Steve Hase" <shase@aesc.com>
References: <11A113B59DF4D311A0DE00805FA7F323028FC4E6@DCMAIL1>
In-Reply-To: <11A113B59DF4D311A0DE00805FA7F323028FC4E6@DCMAIL1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-Path: shase@aesc.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2001 20:22:53.0236 (UTC) FILETIME
=[800B0F40:01C0D27C]

Audrey,

Ben and I have reached an agreement which will be documented as follows:

1)  Extension of Dates -- May  11 becomes May 9 (Wed)

2)  Ben will edit the latest version of the Amendment #2 so that

a) on Aug 1, we pay the greater of the $1.5MM ($2.5 less $1 paid at
exercise) and the Additional Compensation (less the $1 MM)

b)  a separate agreement whereby Corp guarantees the payment on Aug 1.

The intention is to sign the Amendment #3 before 5/9.

Thanks everyone for making this happen.

Steve Hase

(See attached file: #1283523 v5 - AMENDMENT NO 2 TO SPA.doc)


Attached are redlined minutes of meetings of April 6, 9, 13 and 17.  The
changes from what you have already seen are very minor.

**************************
* Confidentiality Notice *
**************************

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and is
intended to be privileged and confidential within the attorney client
privilege.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete all copies of this email message along with all
attachments.  Thank you.
 - 1200244.red.pdf
 - 1200690.red.pdf
 - 1201689.red.2pdf.PDF
 - 1201694.red.2pdf.PDF


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron on 07/11/2002 07:42
AM ---------------------------

	Tom Nemila
	07/10/2002 05:54 PM

To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Work Req.


Jason,

Shanna and I were wondering what you and Donnita were doing for New Years?

-Eric


No, Mark Haedicke looked around and couldn't find it.  So I have to call
ISDA...

	Carol St Clair
	02/02/2001 11:23 AM

		 To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Opinions

Holly:
Was someone able to obtain the password and pull down these opinions, and if
so, who has them?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99
07:51 AM ---------------------------

"Van T. Ngo" <vngo@rice.edu> on 12/04/99 11:17:01 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Christmas break

Dear Vince,

As the holidays approach, I am excited by my coming break from classes
but also about the opportunity to see everyone at Enron again and to
work with you and them soon.  I am writing to let you know that I would
be very happy to work at Enron over my break and I would like to plan
out a schedule.

My semester officially ends Dec. 20th but I may be out of town the week
before Christmas.  I will be available the following three weeks, from
Monday, Dec. 27 to Friday, Jan. 14.  Please let me know if during those
three weeks, you would like me to work and for what dates you would need
the most help so that we can arrange a schedule that would be most
helpful to you and so that I can contact Andrea at ProStaff soon.
Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions about a
possible work schedule for me.

Give my regards to everyone at the office and wishes for a very happy
holiday season!  I look forward to seeing you soon.

Sincerely,
Van Ngo

Ph: 713-630-8038

 - att1.htm


we need to have this info to them by 1:00pm our time.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 07:29 AM
---------------------------

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 06/29/2000 04:26:57 PM
To: sneal@enron.com
cc: kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com
Subject: Important bidweek information

Scott,
  Please let your gas traders know that Inside FERC will not accept bidweek
prices via fax any later than 2 p.m. Eastern time. It takes a great deal of
time
to input each deal by hand and then re-check the data for accuracy -- and
that's
before we even begin to analyze each pricing point to determine the indexes.
  If anyone has any questions, they can contact me at the number below.
Regards,
Liane Kucher, Associate Editor
Inside FERC's Gas Market Report
202-383-2147


In an effort to pull the pieces together, a meeting has been scheduled to
discuss the draft energy and capacity contract (formerly the PPA).  It is
scheduled for Thursday, August 24th, at 900am.  We are still in the process
of locating a conference room, so the location is TBD.

Thanks,

Kay

Here are the most recent comments from VEPCO:

Some of you may have received this already.  I have not compared it against
what we last sent them.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:56 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
02/06/2001 02:50 PM
To: David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re:

Dave,

Both days.

Vince

David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> on 02/06/2001 01:39:58 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: ostdiek@rice.edu
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I just now heard back from Andrew Karolyi.  He will be here on Monday March
12.  Would you be available for dinner either on Sunday March 11 or Monday
March 12?
Thanks, Dave

***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


Jake mentioned Delta but not Panda.  I'm with you - go Delta.  Who wants to
mess with the broker issue?

Ciao,

Kay

From: Carlos Sole on 03/09/2001 05:30 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
mreuter@kslaw.com
cc:

Subject: Salmon Update -- No Cmts until Monday

Steve Thome just called with an update:

- Panda will be providing comments next week

- Sunlaw dropped out because California rescinded its fast track permit
approval process and thus Sunlaw will not have permits for the facilities it
wants

- Delta will provide comments on Monday

Have a good weekend.  Go Delta they're the remaining high bidder.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
11:38 AM ---------------------------

"Love, Dianne" <love@cl.uh.edu> on 02/09/2001 10:44:22 AM
To: "'Phillip.M.Love@enron.com'" <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Tiger recruiting #1

I cannot open this.  Please resend to me at the university.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com [SMTP:Phillip.M.Love@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:13 PM
> To: dlove8847@aol.com; Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com; James Love;
> jmjaked@mindspring.com
> Subject: Tiger recruiting #1
>
> A Texas grad I work with found this on one of his alum sites.  The guy
> that
> put this out - Flea- is the auburn guy who runs thetigeronline.com.
> Pretty
> funny.
> PL
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
> 01:08 PM ---------------------------
>
> Eric Bass   02/08/2001 12:47 PM
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic01054.pcx)
>
> To:   Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad
>       Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
>       Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
>       Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  Tiger recruiting #1
>
> Sorry, but this is funny . . .
> http://auburn.nu/board/display.cgi?read=236745
>
>  << File: pic01054.pcx >>


Please plan on attending our next Credit/Legal seminar.  This seminar will be
held Wednesday, April 18th, from 2:00 - 3:30 p.m. in EB49c3 and will be a
continuation of our discussion regarding The Credit Support Annex and
Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Master Agreement.  Refreshments will be provided.
Please reply to this e-mail if you are unable to attend.


Harry, we are working on a data project and I have a question for you.  Could you give me a call when you get back from Vacation?-Regards! Kim