Dear Joe,  I'm Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook filling in for Jay Rickerts.   On Friday, we'll bring you the latest from Washington on the final day of the FERC's weeklong workshop on Regional Transmission Organizations.  Participants have told our bureau the workshop has been productive and tomorrow we'll find out how the meetings might impact FERC's implementation of RTOs.  Former FERC Commissioner Don Santa will give us his thoughts during the 2:00 p.m. ET newscast on where RTOs stand now.   We'll also get more reaction to the nomination of Joe Kelliher to fill the open seat at the FERC.  Gay Friedmann of the INGAA will give us her thoughts on Kelliher's nomination during the 9:00 a.m. ET newscast.   Finally from Washington on Friday, we'll bring you the latest from Congress on energy legislation.  The anthrax scare has impacted an already crowded Congressional calendar and there's mixed opinion in the Senate on whether lawmakers there will vote on a comprehensive energy bill this year.     ENL's Gale Smith reports, a major energy company is launching a  one-of-a-kind Web site to buy fuel.  The unique idea behind this is that customers helped develop the site.  Motiva Vice President of Commercial Marketing and Distribution Ralph Grimmer talks about the site from the Houston bureau on Friday.   The Houston bureau will also bring us a report on Sakonnet Technology on Friday.  Sakonnet was started by a handful of former employees from JP Morgan and Merrill Lynch and has found success by being able to offer the same level of support as more established investment banks - for less money.  Join us tomorrow from the Houston bureau for all the details on Sakonnet.      From the West Coast bureau, ENL's Kym McNicholas says we'll have word on Friday from Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham's press conference and remarks from his keynote address at Hoover Institution's Conference on California's electricity crisis.       California Governor Gray Davis is expected to announce his administration's strategy to attempt renegotiation of the long-term power contracts the state signed between January and September of this year with electricity providers.  Log on for these stories and more from the West Coast bureau.    Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Peter Cook, EnergyNewsLive.com Washington Bureau Chief  View today's Energy Wrap video   (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Mark,

Could you please update me on the status of due diligence and document
preparation for Chile, Peru and Korea?

Thanks,

Dave


The final decision added an average rate cap for industrial users.  It has
the effect of lowering rates slightly.  Also, direct access remains exempt
from the surcharge but language is added to ensure that DA Customers receive
no bill credit.  The decision also adds the notion that the CPUC will now
look at redesigning the credit system to "reflect current structural reality."

Sue


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 06:03 PM -----

	ClickAtHomePilot3@ENRON
	Sent by: Kevin Whitehurst@ENRON
	01/22/2001 08:47 PM

		 To: ClickAtHomePilot3@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: ClickAtHome Internet Service & PC Ordering Now Available!

Internet Service is now available for ordering! ?As a Pilot 3 Invitee of the
ClickAtHome program, you can now order your PC and Broadband Internet Service
through the ClickAtHome Pilot website, which may be accessed at
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com (launch through Internet Explorer only). ?
All Pilot participants are encouraged to place their PC order by January
25th.

Many of our Internet Service vendors are ready to begin providing service to
you today, while all vendors will be ready by late February. ? The
ClickAtHome Internet Service Providers whom are currently available for
internet service are:
?

Time-Warner in Houston, (cable modem)
Kingwood Cable, (cable modem)
AT&T - Portland. ?(cable modem)

MSN, providing both dial-up and DSL service nationwide, and Cox Cable -
Omaha, providing cable modem service, ?will be available in late February.
?We will provide further communication as soon as MSN and Cox Cable - Omaha
orders can be placed. We appreciate your patience in advance.

To pre-qualify and sign up for service in your area today with Time Warner
Houston, Kingwood Cable or AT&T- Portland, refer to
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com for specific provider information and
instructions on how to place your order. ?If you have problems launching the
site, please copy and paste http://clickathomepilot.enron.com directly into
Internet Explorer.

The ClickAtHome Team is excited to bring you these options.

ClickAtHome Team


I need your EXCEPTIONAL help with this...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 05:18
PM ---------------------------

j.nassos@pecorp.com on 01/30/2001 05:16:08 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Gregg.Penman@enron.com, t.hermann@pecorp.com, r.dobson@pecorp.com

Subject: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate

Hello Kay -

It's been a long time since we've last spoken and I hope things are well.
In November, Gregg Penman had sent me two confidentiality agreements related
to enovate and asked that I forward any comments to you directly.  I finally
have reviewed them and have a couple comments.

The only proposed changes that need explanation are in paragraphs 1 and 3 of
each agreement.  Paragraphs 1 and 3 are typical provisions in a
confidentiality agreement where each side is evaluating a transaction.
However, the confidential information disclosed under these particular
agreements is going to be used not only for trading activities but also in
connection with audit rights related to an existing and ongoing contractual
relationship.  The confidentiality agreements should not affect enovate's
and PMW's rights under the LLC Agreement.  Accordingly, the proposed changes
are my attempt to clarify the usual text.

Please call if you wish to discuss.  I believe my procrastination has
resulted in the business people wanting to sign these up next week, so your
attention to this is appreciated.  Thanks.

 <<Conf Ag enovate L.L.C. (evaluation of enovate LLC) v1 ENOVATE CMTS
MRK.doc>>  <<Conf Ag Peoples Energy Resources Corp. (evaluation of enovate
LLC) revision 3 PEC CMTS.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Conf Ag enovate L.L.C. (evaluation of enovate LLC) v1 ENOVATE CMTS MRK.doc
 - Conf Ag Peoples Energy Resources Corp. (evaluation of enovate LLC)
revision 3 PEC CMTS.doc


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034923&Page=
MyReq.


Hi Sally,

I just received the email announcing your promotion, and wanted to take this
opportunity to congratulate you.

Regards,
Bani


The second phase of reconstruction on IH 45 between W. Dallas and Memorial
will begin Saturday, November 11, 2000, all northbound lanes will be closed
at 7 PM.  All northbound traffic will detour to US 59 North to IH-610 Loop.
Two northbound lanes will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000, at 5 AM.

  The Houston Avenue / Memorial Avenue exit and the entrance from Pease,
  St. Joseph's Parkway, and Walker  will be closed until further notice.
Anyone
  typically using these routes must find an alternate route.

The following routes are recommended by the Texas Department of Transportation

New Ramp Chartres at Runnels to IH 10 West

Louisiana North to IH 10 West on ramp

Allen Parkway to Studemont or Waugh to IH 10

West Gray to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

Bagby (W. Dallas) to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

San Jacinto to IH 10 East

North on main to IH 45

Travis to IH 45

The Downtown District is updating it's web site with detailed road closure
maps and suggested alternate routes.  This information is available at
http://www.downtownstreets.com. Please check this site regularly for updates
on street closures.


Call in information:
800-991-9019 US
847-619-8039 Canada
pass code# 6113873


Please provide Mary with a copy of the Canada reports by the end of the day
Thursday.  Thanks.

Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf

Jan WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clf-qof.pdf
Jan Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Jan Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Dec/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
11:34 AM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 11/22/2000 04:06:24 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp112700.pdf


The outage is scheduled for 1/4/00 to 1/6/00.  It will not effect 1/1/00
throught 1/3/00.  There is no need for Duke to hold gas back until 1/4/00.

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 10:47 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Charlotte Hawkins                           12/30/99 09:07 AM

To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Koch Three Rivers, #6722

I spoke with Larry Zamit this morning regarding the outage January 1 through
6.  He agreed to hold the gas for us and batch it throughout the rest of
January.  At this point we have 3,007 nominated for 1/1/00 and that is what
he has agreed to hold.

Questions??  Give me a call.

Charlotte/Aimee


Enjoy!
 - 20011118ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011118ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


I have retained Kerry Notestine from Littler Mendelson to help me on this project, so we don't need to get Bob Vote involved.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yowman, Andrea
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Kimberly, Kelly; Lighthill, Sandra
Subject:	Follow-up

Michelle,
After our conversation on Wednesday, we put together a summary of RIF Issues and Strategies to review with the key HR personnel.  Attached is a copy of the summary for your review.  In addition, attached is a copy of recommendations from a compliance  perspective on areas that we would like to see considered as plans are made.  Robert Jones has recommended that we meet with you and Robert Vote from a litigation perspective on what we should be looking at from a compliance standpoint, specifically with adverse impact analysis.  Please let me know when we can quickly get together. Thanks. ay

 << File: RIF Summary.doc >>  << File: Compliance and Diversity Layoff Recommendation.doc >>

Andrea Yowman
Enron Corp
713-853-1477


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001
02:39 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/20/2001 11:49:50 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - JB  002

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John Brindle
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JB  002
Report Total: $2,105.05
Amount Due Employee: $2,105.05

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041120.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 20 / Preferred:  10.99 / Final:  10.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000071753&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000071753
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 10/29/01 12:45:10 PM
Requested For       : heather.a.johnson@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION

Your Date of Migration is: May 15th

YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action:
Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed email
items as possible BEFORE your date of migration.? After you are migrated to
Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox space.?? If more
than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEND
E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit.? Cleaning up your Notes email now
will prevent this from happening to YOU.

Enron,s messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook
2000 worldwide.  You will be accessing Outlook for all of your email
functions.

WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000?

Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to
Microsoft Exchange/Outlook.  The most prominent factors were:

? Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated with
current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer)
? More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features
? Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices
? Instant Messaging capabilities

WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000?

? Email Messages.  From the date of your scheduled migration, the last (30)
thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook.
? All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in.
? To Do Items
? Journal Items
? Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten years in
the future will be converted.
? Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created.  You will
need to re-create these in Outlook.

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


Paul:
Yes, that is right.  Frank Sayre will check with outside counsel to see what
exactly we need to file and get back to you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Radous, Paul" <Paul.Radous@ENRON.com>
	05/22/2001 05:39 PM

		 To: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Hendry, Brent" <Brent.Hendry@ENRON.com>, "Abramo, Caroline"
<Caroline.Abramo@ENRON.com>, "Shackleton, Sara" <Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com>
		 Subject: RE: Cash Collateral

Carol,

I'm assuming we'd have to do this all over again once we have an ISDA (I
guess we register the credit support annex?)...  Does this process
compromise any confidential information?

Paul

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  "Chris Garrod" <CGGarrod@cdp.bm>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Chris+20Garrod+22+20+3CCGGarrod+40cdp+2Ebm+3E+40
> ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:02 AM
> To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
> Cc: Hendry, Brent; Abramo, Caroline; Radous, Paul; Shackleton, Sara
> Subject: Re: Cash Collateral
>
> Carol:
>
> The total estimated cost would be in the region of $1,250 - $1,500,
> including disbursements.
>
> Please feel free to let me see a copy of the charging document.
>
> Kind regards
> Chris Garrod
>
> >>> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 04/18/01 12:18PM >>>
>
> Chris:
> Thanks for your prompt response.  I think that we do need to register
> the
> charge document which in this case would be the confirmation that will
> be
> executed. Can you provide me with an estimate of the total cost?
>
> Does everyone at Enron agree?
>
> Caroline,
> I will redraft the Bermuda confirm to change from LC's to cash and
> send to
> you.  Please make sure that the counterparty is aware that we plan to
> register/file the confirm in Bermuda.
>
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3889
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> carol.st.clair@enron.com
>
>
>
>                     "Chris
>                     Garrod"              To:
> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
>                     <CGGarrod@cdp        cc:
> <Brent.Hendry@enron.com>, <Caroline.Abramo@enron.com>,
>                     .bm>                 <Paul.Radous@enron.com>,
> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
>                                          Subject:     Re: Cash
> Collateral
>                     04/18/2001
>                     09:50 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Carol
>
> Under Bermuda law, there is no real concept of "perfecting" security
> since
> it is not necessary to ensure the enforceability in Bermuda that a
> charge
> be registered in Bermuda.  However, although it is not necessary for a
> security interest to be registered in order for it to be valid, the
> charge
> document itself can be registered in Bermuda in the Register of
> Charges in
> accordance with Section 55 of the Companies Act 1981 in order to
> ensure the
> priority in Bermuda of the charge.  On registration, any charge
> evidenced
> in the charging document will have priority over any unregistered
> competing
> charge or any subsequently registered competing charge in respect of
> the
> assets which are the subject of the charge (i.e. the cash).
>
> If the agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law, it
> will
> be a matter of the laws of either Texas or New York as to the actual
> nature
> of the security interest which is created by the charge.
>
> If you would like us to effect the registration of the charge, we
> would
> need an original (or a certified true copy) of the executed document
> which
> creates the security interest.  There is no time limit on such
> registration.  However, please note that, in addition to our
> professional
> fees, there is a filing fee of $446 which is payable in respect of the
> registration.
>
> I trust that the above is of some assistance.  If you have any
> questions
> please do not hesitate to contact me.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Chris Garrod
>
>
> Christopher Garrod
> Conyers Dill & Pearman
> Clarendon House, 2 Church Street
> Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda
> Direct dial  441 299 4923
> Fax:  441 292 4720
> email  cggarrod@cdp.bm
>
> >>> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 04/17/01 06:54PM >>>
> Christopher:
> We have done a trade with a Bermuda hedge fund and have negotiated
> collateral provisions that may require them to post csah to us.  The
> agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law.  We need
> your
> advice on how to perfect our interest in any cash posted to us that we
> would hold in an account in the United States.  Could you please call
> either me or Sara Shackelton (713)853-5620 if possible tomorrow or you
> can
> send me an e-mail if that is easier.  I'm hoping that our possession
> of the
> cash is enough.  Sorry for the short fuse on this.  If you need any
> additional information, please contact me or Sara.  I will be
> unavailable
> from 9-11 and 2-3 tomorrow Houston time.
>
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3889
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> carol.st.clair@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>


>From: "Sara" <SaraG@houston.rr.com>
>To: Elicia Boggs <eliciaboggs@hotmail.com>, Stacey <zoeieF@aol.com>,   Chi
>Nguyen <chi325@hotmail.com>
>CC: "\"Alyce  >\" <"<palaciosia@yahoo.com>,   "\"Joanna Banana  >\" <Joanna
>L Failla" <JFailla2@compuserve.com>
>Subject: The perfect Couple
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:43:47 -0600
>
>
> >
> >> > > > >> Try this it will only take about 30 Seconds.
> >> > > > >>   Click
> >here
> >> >
> >> >
>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


np...
have a happy new year

-----Original Message-----
From: Saibi, Eric
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Muschar, Daniel
Subject: RE: request

got it, thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Muschar, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:15 AM
To: Saibi, Eric
Cc: Tamma, Ramanarao
Subject: RE: request

I have one at my desk at 05563...Whoever wants it can come get it.

Later,
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Saibi, Eric
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Muschar, Daniel
Subject: RE: request

Hey there,

I'd like to get that cable if you are still around.  Call me on my cell if you are 713-594-2776.  Thanks.  Otherwise I'll just get it after the Xmas.  Thanks and have a nice holiday.

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Muschar, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Tamma, Ramanarao
Cc: Saibi, Eric
Subject: RE: request

I have the cable now if u r still here.

Daniel A. Muschar
Trader Support Group
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

-----Original Message-----
From: Tamma, Ramanarao <Rao.Tamma@ENRON.com>
To: Muschar, Daniel <Daniel.Muschar@ENRON.com>
CC: Saibi, Eric <Eric.Saibi@ENRON.com>
Sent: Thu Dec 20 12:20:05 2001
Subject: RE: request

can u please give it to Eric Saibi. I will be out of office for the rest of the week.
-Rao

-----Original Message-----
From: Tamma, Ramanarao
Sent: Thu 12/20/2001 9:28 AM
To: Muschar, Daniel
Cc:
Subject: request

Daniel,
   need a printer cable.
thanks
-Rao

Ramanarao Tamma
Sr. Specialist
Market Intelligence
X 33066


I do recall the conversations you and I had (actually a series of pages, I
believe), so I'll check with Rebecca and see if she still has those signature
pages.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 05/14/2001 11:42:27 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: NW escrow agreement

Kay-are you certain that Enron didn't sign it, because I recall that it was
signed (and the conversations we had about getting it signed)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: RE: NW escrow agreement

Marissa,

I suppose that's because ENA didn't sign it, as I didn't notice it (opps).
It will probably be tomorrow since Ben will need to initial, as well as me.
Can you email me the sig page?

Thanks,

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 05/14/2001 10:26:16 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  RE: NW escrow agreement

Kay:

This past Friday, I received six original signature pages to the Letter
Agreement, but did not receive original signature pages to the Guaranty.
Could you forward the signature pages to the Guaranty at your earliest
convenience?

Thanks,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:54 AM
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com; mreuter@kslaw.com
Subject: NW escrow agreement

Hi there,

I believe Chris should be back today, so I wanted to follow up on this.

I don't have any recollection of where we left the escrow agreement with
NW.  Please get with MKahn or Jerry DeBerry to see if we can get consensus
on the current form of escrow agreement.  Once we have that, Enron (Chris)
will make contact with Citibank.

Thanks,

Kay
                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


FYI: Attached is a letter from Senator Brulte and Assembly Member Cox to the
Governor in response to his signing yesterday of SB 28x (Sher), which makes
several IEP-sponsored changes to the CEC siting process.  Brulte/Cox outline
in this letter the next steps they believe should be taken to streamline the
siting process and propose other fixes to getting more generation on-line.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - brulte_010522.pdf


Lisa,

Per your request.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 08:45
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/18/2000 12:30 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Distribution

Kay:

Just to let you know I am supposed to have the copies of the LM6K purchase
agreement today and was planning to distribute them today.  I thought I'd
deliver the Bank's original to Roseann along with a copy.

I'll send her an electronic copy also.


Just a quick update of election activities and "coming attractions".

 <<October 31 Business Briefs.doc>>

And, remember, for breaking election results . . . tune to BIPAC for the
BEST political coverage for the American business community.

 - October 31 Business Briefs.doc


Attached, in WordPerfect format are the following documents, marked against
the previous draft circulated::

Closing Checklist (258185)
Series Certificate (258191)
Series Supplement (258196)
Drawdown Request (258198)
Total Return Swap Confirmation (258201)
Put Option Agreement (258202)
Put Option Assignment (258215)
Notice of Put Option Assignment (258218)
Second Amended & Restated LLC Agreement of McGarret IV (258239)
Second Amended & Restated LLC Agreement of Big Island IV (258206)
Receipt of Trust (258270)
Independent Auctioneer Letter Agreement (258302)
Am. No. 1 to Sale & Auction Agreement (258307)
Direction Letter to Owner Trustee (260012)

PLEASE NOTE THAT, AT THE REQUEST OF SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE WORKING GROUP, I
AM ALSO SENDING THESE DOCUMENTS MARKED AGAINST MCGARRET C.

Please call or e-mail if you have any questions.

Muriel C. McFarling
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 659-4461
(214) 659-4784 (fax)

Muriel C. McFarling
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 659-4461
(214) 659-4784 (fax)

 - 260012.wpd
 - 258191.wpd
 - 258196.wpd
 - 258198.wpd
 - 258201.wpd
 - 258202.wpd
 - 258215.wpd
 - 258218.wpd
 - 258239.wpd
 - 258260.wpd
 - 258270.wpd
 - 258302.wpd
 - 258307.wpd
 - 258185.wpd


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Zufferli, John
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 2:29 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	FW: Strictly Confidential

Here is the info for the commercial staff

John Z
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Strictly Confidential

John, please check with Louise as how to get the attached to her.


Group,

California has asked us to swing energy up from NOB around to COB...We do
this by using the following account #'s.
1. The CISO provides us with energy at NOB
2.  We then use BPA(t) to take it to SNOPUD-BPA account #682840
3.  We do a buy/resale with SNOPUD for $25
4.  SNOPUD gives us the energy at their system and we take it to PGE at John
Day- BPA account #840542
5.  We use PGE direct from John Day down to the CISO.
6.  We collect $150 from the CISO for the service.

Phone numbers are:
BPA(t):9-1-360-418-2581
SNOPUD:9-1-425-304-1620
PGE(t):8650

The CISO would like to be able to call upon this when PATH 15 problems occur
and they are in an emergency situation.
When the CISO asks, please put this deal in as early as possible, and then be
sure to check out closely with all counterparties including the CISO at NOB
and COB.

As always, please ask me if you have any questions.  I can be reached on my
cell phone at 503-887-3889.

Thank you,

Bill


keep your nose clean
-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah.Fiorito@dynegy.com [mailto:Deborah.Fiorito@dynegy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:01 PM
To: mpalmer@enron.com
Subject: Steve's comments

----- Forwarded by Deborah Fiorito/HOU/Dynegy on 11/26/01 01:00 PM -----

                    Steve Lipin
                    <slipin@brunswick        To:     "'deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com'" <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>
                    group.com>               cc:
                                             Subject:
                    11/26/01 12:26 PM

This email is sent by Brunswick Group Limited, 16 Lincoln's Inn Fields,
London, WC2A 3ED (also the registered office). The company is registered in
England (No. 2094879).

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use
or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete
this E-mail.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
(See attached file: Dynegy 1126.doc)


This follows up on your voice mail message regarding the status of the
Confidentiality Agreement in light of renewed discussions between the two
companies.  Attached is the latest draft of the Confidentiality Agreement
which was transmitted to you on May 13.  Please call me with any comments or
questions.

 <<Confidential AGrement with Enron which was sent to Ben Rogers on 51200  -
this version is a clean version accepting all blacklined changes from
59437v3.DOC>>

 - Confidential AGrement with Enron which was sent to Ben Rogers on 51200  -
this version is a clean version accepting all blacklined changes from
59437v3.DOC


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has recommended ATK (Long) at Oct 23 2001  7:50AM
	Alliant Techsystems (NYSE:ATK)   Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  ATK   84.80   5:01PM  0.00  87.49  84.80  0  Community Take   32 Long / 3 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Tue Oct 23 07:48:26 2001   stochastic oversold.   stop below the recent intraday low friday of 82.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


Just in case you want to have around............

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Seaman/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------
Kenneth Seaman   02/07/2000 10:17 AM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: February Buyback Deals

Attached is my list for Feb. Please let me know if you see anything out of
the ordinary.

Ken


----- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on 08/10/01 08:44 AM -----

                    "Gagliardi,
                    Michael"             To:     "'dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com'" <dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com>,
                    <mgagliardi@u        "'david.ricks@spotplus.com'" <david.ricks@spotplus.com>,
                    nocal.com>           "'tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com'" <tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com>
                                         cc:
                    08/10/01             Subject:     FW: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #75
                    07:13 AM

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         TruOrange@aol.com [SMTP:TruOrange@aol.com]
> Sent:         Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:13 PM
> To:           TruOrange@aol.com
> Subject:           True Orange E-Mail/Fax #75
>
> True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service
> Volume 9, E-Mail/Fax #75, Thursday, August 9, 2001
> Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
> Phone
> 512-795-8536
>
> Longhorn Veterans Report; Ellis, Wyndham Only Players Missing
>
> Senior linebacker Jon Wyndham and sophomore tight end Artie Ellis were
the
>
> only Longhorn veterans missing Thursday when the other 60 scholarship
> varsity
> players reported to begin pre-season practice.
> Head coach Mack Brown  said Wyndham, a senior who has played primarily on

> special teams during his career, did not report with the team due to
> unresolved medical issues that are unrelated to football.  He said the
> medical issues might cause Wyndham to miss the fall semester. He did not
> elaborate.
> He said Ellis,  who played in seven games and caught eight passes for 77
> yards as a receiver last year, is taking the fall semester off for
> personal
> reasons and to further recover from a stress fracture in his tibia.  That

> injury limited his action in 2000 and sidelined him during spring drills.
> He
> moved to tight end last spring and Brown said the coaches expect him to
> return in January for the spring semester.
> Wyndham is not expected to return to the team. "I really want to be with
> my
> teammates and help the program," he said, "but I need to take care of
> myself
> first.  I came here to play football and get an education and even if I
> don't
> play again, I want to leave here with a degree."
> "I'd like to thank my coaches and teammates for all their support," Ellis

> said, "but it is in my best interest at this time to take care of my
> personal
> issues and to further recover from my stress fracture. I wish the
> Longhorns
> the best of luck this season and look forward to coming back strong next
> January."
> The veterans joined the freshmen for a team meeting  Thursday night and
> both
> groups will go through orientation Friday before their first full team
> workout at 9 a.m. Saturday at Frank Denius Field at the corner of 26th
> Street
> and Red River.
> "Obviously this group of veterans is excited to get things started,"
Brown
>
> said.  "A lot of them have been here all summer and several of the guys
> have
> been out at the freshmen workouts the past  two days.  But, today's
> reporting
> day is what we have been waiting  for since the spring game.  With a
> couple
> of exceptions, we now have  everyone here.  The guys have tomorrow off to

> focus on academics and  to get acquainted with the newcomers and then
> we'll
> get down to  business on the field Saturday."
> * * * *
> Coach Brown also reset Sunday's practice for 3:30 p.m. He had said
> Wednesday
> he would move it to the early morning, but he said Thursday he decided to

> keep in it the afternoon because the team's second workout Saturday will
> be
> at 7 p.m., and he said he thought the players needed more rest before the

> Sunday practice.
> * * * *
> RECRUITING NOTES: The Longhorns have a great shot at landing three or
four
>
> top out-of-state stars in this recruiting class. As I reported in
> yesterday's
> e-mail/fax, WR Marquis Johnson of Champaign, Illinois, is close to
> committing
> to Texas, and UT also is in strong contention for DEs Chase Pittman of
> Shreveport Evangel and Bryan Pickryl of Jenks, Oklahoma, and DT Kasey
> Studdard of Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Pickryl, one of the nation's top
> pass-rushing ends, took an unofficial visit to OU last week and came away

> saying Texas, UCLA and Missouri are his top three teams at this point.
> Pittman says his top two teams are Texas and LSU, and Studdard is a
strong
>
> lean to UT. Pittman and Pickryl plan to graduate in December and enroll
in
>
> college for the spring semester, which will allow them to go through
> spring
> training at their respective colleges.
> BASKETBALL RECRUITING NOTES: Heather Schreiber, the 6-3 star from
> Windthorst
> who will be a freshman at Texas this basketball season, led her AAU team
> to
> the championship of the national Basketball Coaches' Association
> tournament
> and was named the tourney MVP after averaging 29 points a game in the
> tourney. . . The Longhorn women are off to a good start in this year's
> recruiting with a pledge from point guard Nina Norman, a  5-8 star at
> Jersey
> Village who is ranked as a national top 50 player. Two other players
Texas
>
> was recruiting have committed to other schools. Guard Chelsi Welch, who
> led
> Plainview to the state Class 4A title last year, picked Oklahoma, and
> Lindsey
> Harding, a  5-7 guard from Cypress Falls, who also is a national top 50
> player, chose Duke.
> * * * *
> My next e-mail/fax will be whenever events warrant.
> * * * *
> The True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service includes  at  least  99 fax/e-mails  a

> year and costs $99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes
> 26
> newsletters and is published weekly during football season and twice
> monthly
> during most of the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to
both
>
> for $130 (or $110 if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take
> both
> services via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also
> update my 900 number - 1-900-288-8839 - daily with recruiting news. My
> E-Mail address is: truorange@aol.com.


Attached are summaries of two SDG&E advice letters.? No protest  material
here.
?
Dan
 - 12-11-00 SDG&E AL Summary Chart.doc


Congratulations.  Glad to hear all went well (save the emergency C-section).
See you soon.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 12/11/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121122.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred: 497.76 / Final: 497.76)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 12/11/01
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022815.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


Attached in support of Agenda Item 5B , ICAP, for the December 12, 2000
Business Issues Committee meeting, and pursuant to the motion passed at the
December 1, 2000 BIC meeting, are the following documents:

1. A clean version of proposed Tariff language on Stage 1A ICAP, consisting
of all those modifications made by the ICAPWG over the course of their
deliberations in the last few months with the exception of  (1) UCAP and (2)
one month OPP; and

2. A blacklined version of that proposed Tariff, marked to show changes from
the current Tariff.

The clean version includes a table of contents for ease of review.

Please note that, pursuant to the motion passed by BIC on December 1,
substantive changes not included in the ICAPWG November 21 Proposed Tariff
(considered by BIC on December 1) must be presented on separate motion at
the December 12 meeting.  The ISO has one such change, to Section 5.12.10;
the language was circulated prior to the December 1 BIC meeting and will be
recirculated tomorrow.

Please call or write with questions or comments. Many thanks.

Kathy Robb
Hunton & Williams
212.309.1128
krobb@hunton.com <mailto:krobb@hunton.com>

 - CLEAN Stage IA 12-07-00.pdf
 - BLACKLINED Stage IA 12-07-00.pdf


Please give me the contact names because I don't know much about this.  Mark

	Mary Cunningham <MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org>
	08/28/2000 09:34 AM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>, Ernest Patrikis
<ernest.patrikis@aig.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: TreasuryConnect

Mark and Ernie:

We received an application for Associate membership from TreasuryConnect, an
Internet-based electronic swaps platform designed to create an online
platform for derivatives transactions between corporations and banks.

Both AIG and Enron are investors in TreasuryConnect.  Are you familiar with
them and would you support their membership?

I have contact names at your firms who deal with TreasuryConnect if you need
them.

Thanks,
Mary


We received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:   ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency - Cross Border)

Effective Date:  November 2, 1998

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:  Statoil Marketing & Trading (US), Inc.

Transactions Covered: Approved for all  products, except pulp and paper,
weather, and foreign exchange

PLEASE NOTE:   The Counterparty has three Local Business Days to accept or
dispute the Confirmation.


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject:	Market Area IT Availability - December 24, 2001

December 20, 2001

To:	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers
	and Shippers

Re:	Market Area IT Availability - December 24, 2001

The available interruptible transportation service (IT and
secondary FT) on Transco for pipeline day Monday, December
24, 2001 and continuing until further notice is summarized
as follows:

Tier I and Tier II (only Sta. 90 through
Sta. 180 affected)					0   MDt/day

South Virginia Lateral Compressor Station 167	144 MDt/day

Tier III (Station 180 through East)			0   MDt/day

Leidy at Centerville Regulator Station
(Only deliveries downstream of Centerville
regulator affected)					100 MDt/day

Linden Regulator Station
(Located in Union County, New Jersey)		100 MDt/day

Mobile Bay Lateral			   		162 MDt/day

The above available interruptible transportation service
refers to deliveries into the affected area that have
receipts upstream of the bottleneck or affected area.

If you have any questions, please call John McGrath at (713)
215-2514 or Donna C. Long at (713) 215-4061.

J. E. McGrath
Manager
Operations Planning


Please give me an update or status for the following:

Dynegy Canada Inc. When we last spoke, you were in the review process and
wanted to make changes to credit terms. Please advise on how I should proceed.

Engage Energy Canada LP The draft went to Engage in Oct. of last year.  You
had said you wanted to change credit terms?   Do you want me to keep trying
with this draft or send a new one?

TransAlta Energy marketing Corp. Do you want to change the credit terms ?

Reliant energy Services Canada Ltd. They have requested a Master with HPL?

Please let me have your thoughts on each of these  by early tomorrow as I
have to give Jeff / Stacy a memo regarding  progress.  If was my
understanding from my last conversation with Veronica that there is
significant exposure with some of these.

Many thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Dear Kate,

Thank you for your interest in the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies Program. We would like to confirm that your inquiry has
been received.

We hope that the information we have provided on our web site is helpful in
giving you a good understanding of the Johns Hopkins University SAIS Program
and application process. In response to your request, we will be sending you
the Johns Hopkins University SAIS Program brochure and an application form.
You can expect these materials within three weeks.

We are proud to be at the forefront of innovative technology -- giving you
the option of submitting an electronic application via the Internet. This is
just one of the ways we use technology at the Johns Hopkins University.
You'll also see it in the classroom, in faculty research, and in student
services, from how you register for classes to how you look for a job.

There are several benefits to the Web Application option:

*  Saves time, and it is faster than the mail

*  Generates cleanly formatted applications that are exact replicas of the
paper applications

*  Secure, reliable, and convenient

The Johns Hopkins University SAIS Program Web Application System is a new
convenient option for applicants with access to the Internet. You can create
a private, free user account that you can use to work on the Johns Hopkins
University SAIS Program application. Your user account is password protected
and allows you to work on your application over multiple sessions using any
computer with Internet access (Netscape/Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.0 or
higher recommended).

Our Web Application System provides high levels of privacy and security.

We authenticate users and encrypt all data transmissions, keeping
applications safe. The application fee is identical to the paper application
- you pay no additional charges for use of the system.

There is step-by-step guidance on completing applications. The full set of
instructions is available on-line. A personalized checklist keeps track of
important items and deadlines. And an application auditor double checks your
application prior to submission to ensure all mandatory questions are
answered.

Using the Web Application System is entirely optional. Candidates using the
web application will not be given any preference or advantage over candidates
not using the web application.

The Johns Hopkins University SAIS Program Web Application System is located
at: http://apply.embark.com/grad/JHU/SAIS/. The web site is run by
Embark.com, a web application systems company, on behalf of the Johns Hopkins
University SAIS Program. Embark.com continuously monitors the web site (24
hours a day, 7 days a week) to ensure reliability, and their staff are
available to assist all users of the Johns Hopkins University SAIS Web
Application System.

We encourage you to preview the Web Application System at any time and to use
the system if it meets your needs. If you have any further questions about
the Web Application System, please feel free to email Embark.com at
MBAappmaster@Embark.com, or call their web support staff weekdays between
8:00 AM and 5:00 PM (Pacific time) at 1-800-734-7627 (option 3).

If you have any further questions, please feel free to call us Monday-Friday,
8:00 AM to 5:00 PM PST at (202) 663-5700. We very much look forward to
reading your application.

Sincerely,

Johns Hopkins University SAIS
Admissions Staff


I had IT run numbers of deals that go out past 2002.

Total = 6632
Buys= 3464
Sells= 3168

It will take some time to get alot beyond that info,  but I think this gives a clear picture that there are a substantial number of deals going out long-term.

Thanks


Sara,

As ENA and ECT Investments, Inc., will be the entities where all trades are
actually booked, I would not think that any new agreements would need to be
signed between the new "agent" entitiy and any outside vendors (ie, brokers,
online trading platforms, etc.)  The new entity will never take actual
ownership of the securities.  Therefore, I would presume that the Instinet
agreement should just be an addendum to existing documentation.  The
Posit/ITG agreement will have to be an entirely new agreement because the
ownership structure of ITG Europe is different than that of the States.  This
agreement, however, should reflect exactly the same sort of
structure/language as was used to negotiate the contract between ITG and ENA
and ECT Investments, Inc.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks and regards,
John

From: Sara Shackleton on 25/09/2000 08:35 CDT
To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Instinet and other platforms in the name of ENA or ECT Investments,
Inc.

John:  Hi, there!  As you are aware of the structuring for tax purposes,
until the U.K. corporate agent is actuallly formed, there is nothing further
that I can do.  That formation should happen today or tomorrow.  With the
actual name and agreements with ENA and ECT Investments, Inc., I can provide
that information to Instinet and the other trading platforms you are
interested in transacting on.  Just FYI, the Instinet people are merely
waiting for the agent agreement in order to proceed.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.  Sara


Guys, attached you will find a final cut on the ENA 2001 expense budget.
Please review and make any adjustments to your existing plan that are
appropriate to hit the net ENA target.  In order to stay flat year on year, I
split the remaining positive variance equally across the groups.  As we had
discussed earlier, these costs will not be allocated to the business units
and will be tracked on the ENA income statement below the line and the
accountability managed by each of you.  All outside variable costs,
specifically related to specific deals, will be charged to the business units
eg) outside legal and tax, outside technical expertise, facility costs,
outside research support, incremental back and mid office support for
specific asset management deals, specific entertainment, etc.  I look at this
cost structure as the minimum capacity charge we need to operate our business
and evaluate/manage our risks.

Wes, can you please  finalize the one page plan (expenses and headcount) for
each group with these changes.

Regards
Delainey


Yes, I would be interested in this call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Tim, I just got your letter about  the January trial setting.  When did we
learn of that setting?  How do we accomplish the goal of keeping our business
people free from depositions at year-end?  Can that be done?  Michelle

"Tim C. Carrico" <tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com> on 11/03/2000 08:30:19 AM
To: "Michelle Cash (E-mail)" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
cc: "Charles L. Woody" <cwoody@spilmanlaw.com>
Subject: Richard Clonch v. CRDC, Enron

Michelle, I just spoke to Brian Glasser; he informed me that Clonch wants
1.2 mil, therefore, no settlement.  However,  Clonch and Cline have agreed
to meet again this coming Monday to discuss settlement.  Apparently, Clonch
is going to go back and look at his numbers.

Tim C. Carrico
Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
email: tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com
phone:             (304)-340-3856
cell phone:       (304)-549-2681
fax:                  (304)-340-3801
address:           300 Kanawha Blvd., East
                       Charleston, W.Va. 25301


Please advise your availability ASAP for a call on Wednesday, Nov. 8th at
8:30am Pacific / 10:30am Central / 11:30am Eastern
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/06/2000 11:15 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
11/06/2000 10:41 AM
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan B
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi Nicolay, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, carrrn@bracepatt.com,
Richard Sanders, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novasel@sarah
novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ron's Outline of Comments to November 1 Order

Attached find Ron's outline of comments on the FERC's November 1 order in the
Section 206 proceeding.  They are primarily legal arguments.

Concerning his comments about the congestion management redesign - I'm not
sure that we want to oppose LMP.  I think instead we want to ensure that
there are not a large number of nodes.

Alan will be writing the technical comments on the $150 caps, not Seabron.
Sue called me this morning and said IEP will not be contesting the $150 price
cap.  This is too bad because we had hoped they would carry the ball on
arguing why $150 is not sufficient to incent peaking generation.  Sue is
working on IEP to try to get them to reconsider.

I think we also need to make sure we make all of the arguments that relate to
the CPUC's subpoena.  I have asked Lysa Akin to set up a conference call
about this ASAP with Richard, Dan, Gary Fergus, Me, Mike Day, Sue, and Jim.
Please tell Lysa if I haven't listed you and you wish to be on this call.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
11/03/2000 02:58 PM

To: <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Comments to November 1 Order

I have enclosed my thoughts on which issues to address in our comments.

 - 0133539.01


FYI Only

Attached is a copy of the Gas Logistics presentation that I gave at Phil Lowry's operations conference this morning.


P.S.

I'd like to rear end you too.


Another wrinkle in the El Paso/CPUC Complaint case.  I've also attached a copy of the El Paso Merchant answer to the FERC enforcement staff motion in case you're interested.

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : November 2, 2001
El Paso Seeks to Derail Further Market Power Investigation
The motion by the enforcement staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a "more complete investigation" of unused capacity on the system of El Paso Natural Gas is "an abuse of process," the pipeline and its merchant energy affiliate claimed Thursday, since it comes after the case has been fully litigated.
In filing a motion to strike the enforcement staff's request for the investigation, El Paso Natural Gas and El Paso Merchant Energy said the staff motion is a violation of their due process rights, since an initial decision in the case was issued three weeks ago (see Daily GPI, Oct. 10 <http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/daily/news/d20011010c.html>). At that time Chief Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner Jr. recommended the dismissal of charges that El Paso and its affiliate exercised market power to drive up prices for gas transported to the border beginning in mid-2000 [RP00-241]. The judge had concluded that the complainants in the case failed to carry their burden of proof that the El Paso companies exercised market power by withholding capacity from the market.
After the parties file briefs on the ALJ's decision, all that remains is a vote by the commissioners, the El Paso companies pointed out.
The investigation sought by the Market Oversight and Enforcement Section (MOE) of the Office of General Counsel "seeks to improperly shift the burden of proof by requiring El Paso and Merchant Energy to prove that they did not withhold capacity. This argument turns the Commission's adjudicatory procedures -- and its procedural safeguards -- on their head," the companies said.
"MOE is attempting to inappropriately influence the decision-making process in this already high profile case," putting the integrity of FERC's adjudicatory process in jeopardy. "The rules under which the complaint is to be judged have become a moving target, El Paso's and Merchant Energy's due process rights and reputation have been harmed, and they have been put in the untenable position of now trying to prove a negative. MOE's improper comments should be disregarded and stricken from the record in this proceeding," the companies said.
MOE said the issue it was raising -- whether El Paso made its unused capacity available to shippers on an IT basis, as required by FERC's open-access rule -- was neither the focus of the hearing last summer nor Wagner's initial decision (see Daily GPI, Nov. 1) <http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/daily/news/d20011101d.html>..
MOE said its review of the public portion of the hearing record suggests that El Paso may have committed "potential violations" of FERC's Part 284 open-access regulations by withholding IT capacity in an attempt to keep prices up at the California border, but it said there may be "other potential explanations" for the existence of unused capacity on the pipeline. "We recommend a more complete investigation of the reasons why capacity went unused on the pipeline at times during the period [of] November 2000 through March 2001." MOE conceded its motion was an "unusual" move.
It suggested that the Commission either direct MOE to conduct a further probe, remand the decision to Judge Wagner for consideration or use other procedures. Although "this step is unusual, it is not unprecedented for the Commission's enforcement staff to inform the Commission of its views regarding potential violations concerning a pending proceeding," MOE said.
El Paso pointed to a statement by the judge to back up its claim that parties in the proceeding had agreed that the pipeline was full from November through March.

Here is a copy of the El Paso Merchant Energy response summarized above.  They used some pretty strong language!!

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <rrich@bracepatt.com>
To: Cantrell, Rebecca W. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bcantre>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2001 10:33:33 GMT
Subject:

EPNG/EPME's response


Please review and set up a meeting with me to establish a plan for this
committee.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 01:59 PM -----

	Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
	05/23/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc: Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
		 Subject: Conference Calls

Hello Mark -- given our e-mail traffic the last couple of days I wanted to
quickly summarize our thoughts on next steps:

1.  Conference call - Mark, Ruth and Stacy re: agenda for NA Energy
Committee
2.  Conference call - Mark, Ruth, Stacy, Christophe, Katia, John re:
coordination of committee activities and agenda for December conference

Depending upon your schedule, we hope to try to get these calls scheduled
either this week or early next week.

Many thanks!  -- Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Mark Haedicke
Subject: European Energy Committee Meeting

Hello Mark -- The European Energy Committee meeting was held in London
today. The attached documents, including the agenda, a memo on the Bridge
agreement, and a copy of the Bridge agreement, were reviewed at this
morning's meeting.

Much of the discussion focused on explanation of the Bridge Agreement. There
was some discussion about the German regulatory structure and the bridge
agreement.  Katia ran through the agenda in Houston and asked for ideas on
December conference.  I was not able to hear all of the questions entirely
but questions were asked about the outcome of the meeting.  Katia and
Christophe explained that it was a forum to exchange ideas and to promote
use of ISDA within industry. The minutes should give us more detail.

In addition to a call re: the NA agenda, I think it would be worthwhile to
also have a call w/Christophe, Katia and John Berry to discuss European
activities and to begin discussion on the December agenda. ISDA should begin
to focus on an agenda as soon as possible so that we assure December's
conference is as productive as the Houston conference.  Thanks!

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org


After speaking with Kim Theriot in confirmations, we will not be using the RiskMantra entity, per the legal department.  All Canada to US deals should be booked ENA to ECC (using the new legal entities of course) rather than RiskMantra.  She is waiting on the final word about our new legal entity names, I will let you know what I hear.

Thanks

Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gillis, Brian
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 3:59 PM
To:	Kenne, Dawn C.; Keiser, Kam; Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Lozano, Melba; Sweitzer, Tara; Denny, Jennifer; Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: ECC - Riskmantra counterparties

Dawn,

At this stage, I haven't heard any indications we wouldn't continue to operate this way.

One important thing here is that this 2 leg logic was never applied to the US counterparties we deal with - so we end up having to book a second leg on any deals we do with a Houston counterparty in EOL.  Since this was obviously considered to be worth doing for the US, I don't see why we wouldn't do it for Canada too - it would be a significant time saver.

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kenne, Dawn C.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Gillis, Brian; Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Lozano, Melba; Sweitzer, Tara; Denny, Jennifer; Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	ECC - Riskmantra counterparties

Kam, Kathy and Brian,

Concerning the ECC - Riskmantra logic that EOL has in place to convert the transactions that are done with counterparties with ECC master agreements...are we going to continue this way of booking (2 legs)?  If so, can you review the list of counterparties that follows the "2-leg" logic and let me know if there need to be any additions or deletions?

Thanks,
Dawn

 << File: ECC counterparties.xls >>


Laura,

I have just sent a message to Jim confirming our visit with you on September the 5th.
Is 9:30 a.m. OK with you as our arrival time?

Also, please, send me the directions to your location.

Look forward to meeting you on Wednesday next week.

Vince


Felicia,

This is a merchant asset, which we currently own 100%, but plan to sell down
in the coming months.  It absolutely has separate HR functions from Enron --
they do not participate in Enron benefits, and we are working hard to prevent
any claims that we could be a joint employer with it.

Thoughts?

Michelle

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Felecia Acevedo @ ENRON                           11/02/2000 08:56 AM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

Michelle,  who is GSP?  Are they a legal entity?  Are they on our payroll?
If they are we filed EEO-1's for them.    Below is the criteria to file an
EEO-1 report:

Standard Form 100 must be filed by -

A.  All private employers who are: (1) subject to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of
1972) with 100 or more employees EXCLUDING State and local governments,
primary and secondary school systems, institutions of higher education,
Indian tribes and tax-exempt private membership clubs other than labor
organizations; OR (2) subject to Title VII who have fewer than 100 employees
if the company is owned or affiliated with another company, or there is
centralized ownership, control or management (such as central control of
personnel policies and labor relations) so that the group legally constitutes
a single enterprise, and the entire enterprise employs a total of 100 or more
employees.

B.  All federal contractors (private employers), who: (1) are not exempt as
provided for by 41 CFR 60-1.5, (2) have 50 or more employees, and (a) are
prime contractors or first-tier subcontractors, and have a contract,
subcontract, or purchase order amounting to $50,000 or more; or (b) serve as
a depository of Government funds in any amount, or (c) is a financial
institution which is an issuing and paying agent for U.S. Savings Bonds and
Notes.

All multi-establishment employers, i.e. employers doing business at more than
one establishment, must file: (1) a report covering the principal or
headquarters office; (2) a separate report for each establishment employing
50 or more persons; (3) a consolidated report that MUST include ALL employees
by race, sex and job category in establishments with 50 or more employees as
well as establishments with fewer than 50 employees; and (4) a list, showing
the name, address, total employment and major activity for each establishment
employ-ing fewer than 50 persons, must accompany the consolidated report.

All forms for a multi-establishment company must be collected by the
headquarters office for its establishments or by the parent corporation for
its subsidiary holdings and submitted in one package.

For the purposes of this report, the term parent corporation refers to any
corporation which owns all or the majority stock of another corporation so
that the latter stands in the relation to it of a subsidiary.

The OFCCP has always held that subsidiary companies that do not have direct
govt contracts must comply with AAP regulations if the parent company or
other subsidiary companies benefit from government contracts.  Their line of
thought is that the subsidiary without government contracts benefits
indirectly from the contract as well.   If GSP is completely free standing
and they do not participate in Enron's benefits, abide by our policies or
procedures , participate in our bonus process that may partially or wholly be
funded by Enron Corp. , etc., they may have some type of argement not to
comply  but I doubt it.  If we own them over 51% I don't see a way they could
not file EEO-1's and have an AAP.  We do all the AAP's in Corporate so if
this is a freestanding Business Unit I need to know.

Thanks!

Felecia

Michelle Cash@ECT
11/01/2000 07:49 PM
To: Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

Felicia,  Does this sound right to you?  Just wanted to confirm.  Thanks.
Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 07:48
PM ---------------------------

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/01/2000 07:19:00 PM
To: michelle.cash@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com,
peter.del.vecchio@enron.com
cc: david.howe@enron.com, fran.mayes@enron.com
Subject: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

     Michelle and Peter, we (GSP) have determined that we are not a federal
     government contractor.  Based on feedback from GSP employees, we do
     sell newsprint to printers who print material for the federal
     government, but we are a 'second-tier' contractor, not a 'first-tier'
     contractor.  (Pat McCarthy, the local employment law attorney that I
     have been using, used these terms when David Howe and i talked to him
     today.)  Pat informed us that second-tier contractors do not have to
     abide by all the federal government requirements for contractors.

     Based on this, GSP does not plan to file EEO-1 reports or prepare
     affirmative action plans.  In addition, we do not feel that we are
     subject to an OFCCP audit.

     Michelle, since you left me the voicemail telling me that we are not
     included in the Enron EEO-1, i assume that also means that Enron's
     status as a government contractor does not force us to prepare EEO-1
     and AAPs.

     Please advise us if you feel we have made incorrect assumptions on any
     of this.

     Hoyt


Good evening, Will you be able for a tele conference on the 7 of Aug at 4:00 pm(est). This  seem to be a good time for all parties(Enron/A'Lones) to speak.  Give me a  call to let me know or another  time and or date.  We will be talking about  cover sheet, comfort letter and proposed guaranty of performance document. Please leave a number. Untill then, A. Bernard


Dear all,

Attached is a paper describing the proposed methodology for pricing the
"Bankruptcy Swaps" the Credit Markets group is launching next week. The
methodology is intentionally simplistic - the emphasis has been on providing
transparent models to give prices in a quick, easy-to-understand manner,
rather than create any new "rocket science". Could one or all of you please
review the paper, and give feedback on the approach and advice on the areas
still under development. This will give us peace-of-mind before the big
launch.

Bryan - could you reread this and outline the sections that need omitting or
expanding for publication on the website.

Many thanks,

Ben


The following meeting has been requested by Mary Gosnell, please plan to
attend:

Topic:  Follow-up meeting re:ENA's involvement in EOL issues with other
regulated Enron Entities
Date:  Today, October 25th
Time:  3:30 - 4:30pm
Location: EB30C2

Thank you,

Julissa Marron


Rick,

Just following up on the VaR requests.  Do you have everything you need?

Jeff


Geriann:

This came across blank to us.

	Geriann Warner
	01/08/2001 10:14 AM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, d.basford@worldnet.att.net, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mcurry@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
bjacoby@ect.enron.com, Steve Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, SSLATER@epsa.org
		 Subject:

Geriann Warner
GA - The Americans
Tel: 713-853-5036
Fax: 713-853-7297


get with Diane Goode or Becky Zikes.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Simmons, Linda J.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	CLE Accreditation

Do you know the name of the person who was responsible for obtaining accreditation for the Enron Legal Conference?

Thanks.

Linda Simmons
Enron - Legal
1400 Smith St., EB3833A
Houston, Texas  77002
Tel:  (713) 345-7851
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  linda.j.simmons@enron.com


texas did go to a bowl last year and get run by an arkansas team (sec) that
was blanked 35-0 in their last regular season game against lsu.  big 12 can
say they are up this year, but the fact is there are only two teams playing
football in that conference, ou/nu.  the other teams in the big 12 attribute
their loses to a competitive conference from top to bottom.  i think they
should change the name of the conference to the big 2.  at least the sec is
full of good teams.  "the big 12 - you can't shine shit!"


I only show that we should have triggered 1127631 for December and they did not trigger 1131418 at all.  They will need to provide documentation to us - i.e. signed confirms that show this was done.  Is the trigger price they are suggesting in our favor or not?  If it is in our favor, I am sure we will change it ASAP.  Please let me know.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 10:45 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Triggerable East Deals

Phillip,

Co-Steel is claiming to have triggered two deals for Nov-01 production - 1127631, 1131418.  However, these are not triggered in the system nor can I ascertain who the trader is.  Will you verify / change these deals accordingly, please.

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


Janet, please have someone draft up a short speech for this function.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

Jennifer Walker@ENRON
11/16/2000 03:19 PM
To: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger
Tietz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Austin Energy Groundbreaking Ceremony

According to my records, you have not RSVP'ed for the Austin Energy
Groundbreaking Ceremony scheduled for Wednesday, November 29th at 12:30 p.m.
in Austin, TX.  I am trying to determine an Enron head count so we can plan
accordingly for transportation to and from the ceremony site and the airport
on the day of the event.

Please let me know if you are planning to attend as soon as possible. If you
will be attending, I will contact you regarding transportation.

Thanks in advance for your help in making the Groundbreaking Ceremony  a
success.
Jennifer Walker
Enron Public Relations


The attached memo summarizes the status of the HPL transaction.  Please call
me with any questions.

Regards,
Brian


Martha,

Thanks. In case you missed an FT article, please take a look at the
attachment.

Vince

martha Amram <martha@glazecreek.com> on 05/15/2000 04:28:52 PM
Please respond to martha_amram@sdg.com
To: ronald.alexander@appnet.net, alleman@spot.colorado.edu,
samador@haverford.edu, bambrose@ag-inc.com, yosia@valicert,
andersg@kea.lincoln.ac.nz, timothy.andrews@viant.com, nvagreek@msn.com,
da725563@msxsoc.shell.com, ron_bain@anadarko.com, cbaldwin@hbs.edu,
dbw@alum.mit.edu, bingham@cadence.com, mb155523@msxsoc.shell.com,
rbratvold@lgc.com, tbres@leland.stanford.edu, cannady@techlawgroup.com,
echase@hbsp.harvard.edu, dchew@sternstewart.com,
adriana.chiocchi@marshmc.com, lgc@roce-inc.com, benchu@eaton.com,
mike_cochran@anadarko.com, acohen@zefer.com, ellenco@worldnet.att.net,
kconti@hbsp.harvard.edu, cooperma@nabisco.com, dcooper@amazon.com,
ellencoopersmith@decisionframeworks.com, peter_coy@businessweek.com,
rcripps@leggmason.com, gwendolyn.davis@bankofamerica.com,
cesardebrito@hotmail.com, rdevane@rtcdirect.com, james.dodwell@csfb.com,
asher.drory@utoronto.ca, fdudley@zefer.com, megan@leggmason.com,
faizs@texaco.com, bfinney@bu.edu, sflower99@yahoo.com,
justin_fox@fortunemail.com, froh.rd@pg.com, libbygt@concentric.net,
agardner@hbsp.harvard.edu, pgermeraad@aurigin.com, sgren@leland.stanford.edu,
gh725368@msxsoc.shell.com, manuelh@earthlink.net,
homonoff_richard@alum.mit.edu, jihowell@portfoliodecisions.com,
hunt.rm@pg.com, blakej@stanford.edu, alanjung@sfsu.edu, kaar.jf@pg.com,
kancigor@cadence.com, ekasznik@icmgroup.com, gkaufman@mit.edu,
jim.kelly@csfb.com, fgko@chevron.com, steve.koenig@viant.com,
kogut@wharton.upenn.edu, michael.kran@kran.com, lander@babson.edu,
jlandon@ag-inc.com, bryan.leblanc@documentum.com, shermanl@cadence.com,
jlerner@sham.hbs.edu, genghis.lloyd-harris@csfb.com, kevin.lu@csfb.com,
walucas@mit.edu, whmarks@southernco.com, laura.martin@csfb.com,
michael.mauboussin@csfb.com, McCarthy.Jane.j@bhp.com.au, mcgrathf@macom.com,
mishra@bus.orst.edu, moodyk@babson.edu, geoffmoore@chasmgroup.com,
moore.jl.4@pg.com, pdmoore1@aol.com, gmoore@mdv.com, arunmura@hotmail.com,
lloyd@ipvaluations.com, opler.1@osu.edu, ostermann.jv@pg.com,
steve.plag@csfb.com, jrader@coba.usf.edu, andyr@augustcap.com,
irappaport@aurigin.com, breed@kypnt.com, peterr@gehrung.com, larryr@vsi.org,
mrussell@unocal.com, steve_rutherford@anadarko.com,
ksandberg@hbsp.harvard.edu, aschary@delphi.com,
claire.schary@epamail.epa.gov, scharyp@ucs.orst.edu, shark@usefulwork.com,
kents@cadence.com, jes9@mail.duke.edu, solon@matrixtax.com,
j.song@napier.ac.uk, chuck.sooter@west.boeing.com, jems@nwu.edu,
shulistone@aol.com, robert.taggart@bc.edu, dthomas@beyerlaw.com,
thomas.thomas@gene.com, tilden@ldeo.columbia.edu, stran@cadence.com,
andy.travers@vcx.org, atriantis@rhsmith.umd.edu, ptufano@hbs.edu,
tiffany_tyler@anadarko.com, pwesolow@mit.edu, lwhitman@hbsp.com,
cwilhelm@dow.com, WILKERWG@oge.com, kalli@sbus.cau.edu,
allison@sumeru.stanford.edu, jmballedos@mail.utexas.edu, jlbanks@ibm.net,
antonio_borregon@merck.com, dmb1@gte.net, rainer.brosch@bigfoot.com,
waba@scientist.com, imp21@ibm.net, eccarter@bellatlantic.net, ales@cepel.br,
hingson@aol.com, cptvisef@tin.it, Cramer@tu-harburg.de,
t.cusack@ecomfac.unimelb.edu.au, dcyr@spartan.ac.brocku.ca,
gaily@glenndaily.com, jdomsky@brynmawr.edu, wsd@mining.ubc.ca,
earle@concentric.com, florian.ebert@rwe.de, mehrhard@utk.edu,
mennis@jdtv.com, kcsepstein@aol.com, hakan.erdogmus@iit.nrc.ca,
marc.fetten@gmx.net, franklin@uci.edu, jofuller@na.ko.com,
bac524@mainex1.asu.edu, gersten@platinum.com, hherath@attcanada.net,
rohernandez@exchange.ml.com, uhommel@whu-koblenz.de, khowe@wppost.depaul.edu,
b.jaspers@student.nijenrode.nl, yen_jong@pancanadian.com,
rsk69@centrin.net.id, pkao@lehman.com, jkavan8269@aol.com,
kelly@commerce.uq.edu.au, mkinsman@pepperdine.edu, mklots@scient.com,
kothadc@texaco.com, kuzma@usexchange.net, guilherme.lago@gecapital.com,
om48001@exchange.oldmutual.com, jlarosa@home.com, jlarsen@email.usps.gov,
suzy_larson@sdg.com, pshein8888@aol.com, mtlazar@aol.com,
ncc_washington.parti@ecunet.org, donald.a.leonard@bellatlantic.com,
jlewis@lgc.com, cliberty@mit.edu, kwlicon@email.msn.com, elieu@hotmail.com,
hans.lindstrom@generation.vattenfall.se, david.yue.liu@intel.com,
bmlodge@ibm.net, e.lukas@gmx.de, wm139371@msxsoc.shell.com,
mm189328@msxsoc.shell.com, joao.marques@stud.umist.ac.uk,
mam@europa.fcee.ucp.pt, maxey@aol.com, marguerite.mcgarvey@mail.tju.edu,
skmiller@arnet.com.ar, milevsky@yorku.ca, grover.morganjr@mw.boeing.com,
jmmyatt@bechtel.com, 988078430@98.lincoln.ac.uk, doug.e.oates@saic.com,
pfo@acsu.buffalo.edu, Orejuela.malena@usa.net, papke@pilot.msu.edu,
jovipp@mail.telepac.pt, peske@uni-mannheim.de, rbphillipsjr@mindspring.com,
stephenq@nedcor.com, reitmanathome@worldnet.att.net,
markss@tallan.unp.edu.pe, salgar_mauricio@bah.com, rsamdahl@ix.netcom.com,
Shomphe_lori@lnmta.bentley.edu, asim029@student.auckland.ac.nz,
soeffing@mail.bcpl.net, lsparver@macneal.com,
pj.sparwasser@gipc.bn.shuttle.de, hstein@psychoanalysis.net,
rlsphoto@kreative.net, stringer@gem.co.za, sugimoto@fas.harvard.edu,
jontepper@mediaone.net, luisv@mail.utexas.edu, john.h.vincent@intel.com,
walucas@mit.edu, phwalther@aol.com, jwansley@utk.edu,
brian_woodland@southwire.com, myasinsky@mcdinvest.com, Jiro@alum.mit.edu,
BAZZINOG@DINTEC.COM, PBECCUE@AMGEN.COM, MICHAEL.BRENNAN@ROGROUP,
michael.j.brennan@anderson.ucla.edu, ABRICK@NORELNETWORKS.COM,
DMBROOKS@aol.com, RICK.CHAMBERLAIN@US.PWCGLOBAL.COM,
M.CHECHELNITSKY@SIEP.SHELL.COM, LCHORN@REALOPTIONS-SOFTWARE.COM,
SCIOTTI@AIRCANADA.CA, CLEVESJR@BP.COM, TCOOK@AMGEN.COM,
JAMES-COTTER@NMSU.EDU, LCOY@PSINET.COM, bradc@AMGEN.COM,
DESILVAB@GROTON.PFIZER.COM, DSOUZA.RUBERT@gene.com, DAVID@BJVAL.COM,
GILL_R_EAPEN@GROTON.PFIZER.COM, FAIZS@texaco.com, KFOLADARE@PECO-ENERGY.COM,
BGIFFO@CTP.COM, WGOLEMBESKI@GENENCOR.COM, DGRANT@SWCP.COM,
RAUL.X.GUERRERO@AC.COM, SAMUEL.B.GUNDERSON@BOEING.COM,
DAVE_GUY@HERMANMILLER.COM, JOE_HARROUN@CARGILL.COM, A.HUNT@AUCKLAND.AC.NZ,
PJORGENSEN@ANGLOGOLDNA.COM, VKAMINS@ENRON.COM, GRAHAM.MIAO@AM.PNU.COM,
KOPPELHF@BP.COM, KUBIK_M@ABGENIX.COM, DOUGKUWAHARA@AEC.CA,
JIM_LEDBETTER@OXY.COM, JAEHYUN.LEE@KR.PWCGLOBAL.COM,
DAVID.R.LEONHARDI@BOEING.COM, LISOWSS@texaco.com,
TIMOTHY.LUEHRMAN@US.PWCGLOBAL.COM, KLUM@ZSASSOCIATES.COM,
IRIS.MACK@PARIBAS.COM, SCOTT.H.MATHEWS@BOEING.COM, JONATHA.MAUER@BMS.COM,
JMCCORMACK@sternstewart.com, JOYCE.A.MCGHEE-1@DUPONT.COM, MCLEMDD@texaco.com,
DMEKELBURG@lgc.com, AAMEMON@MARATHONOIL.COM, ALBERTO.MICALIZZI@ROGROUP.COM,
RMIGNONE@EXELONCORP.COM, ANN_MILLER@CARGILL.COM, RALPH_MORALES@HP.COM,
MUSHER@BKB.COM, SCMYERS@mit.edu, DEOHANIA@CMSENERGY.COM,
MATT_OTTMER@BIOGEN.COM, JPEGRAM@PECO-ENERGY.COM, KEITH_REGNANTE@BIOGEN.COM,
MARKSANO@aol.com, BKS@BIOSGROUP.COM, eduardo.schwartz@anderson.ucla.edu,
DAVID.J.SHANNON@AC.COM, ELIZABETH.SHERRIER@AM.PNU.COM, SICK@UCALGARY.CA,
RENE_SILVA@FPL.COM, BORIS.SIMONOVIC@ZH.AEY.CH,
CSPETZLER@REALOPTIONS-SOFTWARE.COM, TOMSPRADLIN@LILLY.COM,
MDSTRTHMAN@MARATHONOIL.COM, RLTAYLOR@TVA.GOV, RODGER@AMGEN.COM,
LENOS.TRIGEORGIS@ROGROUP.COM, UTECHT.KEN@ENDO.COM, P.VANDRIEL@SIEP.SHELL.COM,
AVANSTAVEREN@PLANET.NL, GARDNER.WALKUP@US.PWCGLOBAL.COM, WARNEJ@CHAMPINT.COM,
DWEISS@BEAZER.COM, RALPH.WHITE@marshmc.com, M.V.WILLEMS@KPN.COM,
CORBIN_WOOD@BIOGEN.COM, GARY.ZIBINSKI@CONECTIV.COM, NZOKO@PSINET.COM
cc:
Subject: real options capabilities

Hello!

Attached are two pieces you may find of interest that address
organizational capabilities needed to live the real options story.

The first piece, which I wrote with Laura Martin of CSFB, addresses the
capabilities needed to carry off the Time Warner / AOL merger.  The
second piece lays out some rules for strategy creation -- including the
requisite capabilities -- in a world of uncertainty.

I hope you find these of interest. Feel free to post them on your
corporate intranet or pass on to colleagues.

Regards,
Martha Amram

--

---------
Martha Amram
Managing Director
Navigant Consulting Inc.
(formerly SDG)
2440 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025

650-233-6236
martha@real-options.com
OR
martha_amram@sdg.com
---------------------

 - Valuing the Creation of the Future 2.pdf
 - New Rules.pdf


One correction --- Total project cost for Moore is 229 mil CAD$ (US$ 155 mil).

Jin


As discussed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Janine Juggins
05/25/2000 02:47 AM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: MG acquisition and EOL trades

I am aware that we will be offering some MG products (once the acquisition is
complete) via EOL and want to highlight a few issues upfront:

1. MG Limited is a SFA regulated entity
2. The intention is that the MG acquisition will be held by an off balance
sheet fund by the end of the year. This means that MG entities will not be
subsidiaries of Enron Corp. I wonder whether there are any legal or
regulatory issues arising from offering the bid/offer prices of
non-subsidiaries via EOL (or maybe a wholly owned Enron sub posts the prices
and then hedges with MG ?).

Regards
Janine


*  from Govt Affairs
*  DA customers are exempt from both plans

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/10/2001
05:59 PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/10/2001 04:23 PM

Apologies to those who already got this from Harry.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 02:20 PM -----

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 12:31 PM

CORRECTION - last line, Monday, May 14

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 01:16 PM

2 proposed decisions were released last night by the California PUC - one by
the Judge and one by Chairman Lynch.

Direct access customers are exempt from the surcharge.
Each customer class is allocated an equal 3 cents, plus an amount to cover
the shortfall from having residential usage up to 130% of baseline exempt
from the surcharge (as required by law).  Each decision allocates a
substantial portion of the subsidy to non-residential classes, although Lynch
does this to a lesser extent
The new rates become effective June 1, and the shortfall from the actual
effective date of the increase, March 27, through June 1 will be amortized
over 12 months.
Residential rate design - 5 tiers will be put in place; the 5th tier (300+%
of baseline) gets a 35 cent per kwh rate
Non-residential rate design - recommendations to put all of the increase into
summer on-peak were rejected.  About 60% of increase put into summer.
Real Time Pricing was endorsed - will further explore in workshops starting
later in May.  Voluntary program will be started.
In a vindictive outlash, Lynch decision requires federal facilities to pay
market prices under new schedules to be developed by the utilities
Judge's decision seems to require surcharge to show up as a separate line
item; Lynch's decision requires that it not be shown separately

Oral argument occurs Friday and final decision is expected to be voted out
Monday, June 14.


7:00 Saturday,,,2633 cason in West U


Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


On November 17, 2001 between 01:00 and 05:00 Entergy will be switching to an OASIS node provided by ESCA. During the outage customers will NOT have access to the current OASIS site provided by MAIN. Once the OASIS comes back online there will be a link at the current OASIS site provided by MAIN that will direct customers to the new OASIS site provided by ESCA. Once the new OASIS node is up, the customers should not have any trouble accessing the site.

You have received this email because your email address is listed as a valid customer email with Tradewave.  If you feel you have received this email in error, please contact your system administrator and have your profile changed or removed from Tradewave.

Entergy Transmission Operations


In a frank discussion with Barry I had to advise him that it will be very
difficult for him to succeed in the role I proposed for him (and indeed in
his current role in the medium term). He is standing in the cross-hairs of a
rifle sight - one move and he's dead.

I have no doubt that we will find a role for this talented individual which
will enable him to sustain the tremendous level of contribution that we are
used to seeing from him.

Of course it will mean that progress in developing our trading support
operations will be slower than it otherwise would have been. I shall be
looking for a suitable candidate to fill the co-ordination role - as you
know, individuals of the necessary calibre and experience are rare.

Fernley


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 11:42 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/19/2001 11:15 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Decision in Distributed Generation Proceeding

The Commission has issued a draft decision in the distributed generation
proceeding.? It?adopts the Energy Division's program proposals for  load
control and distributed generation initiatives and?authorizes a total  of
$137.8 million in funding for these programs, on an annual basis through
December 31, 2004.

Since the Commission cannot raise electric utility rates until?it  has
determined that the rate freeze is over, it has decided to include the costs
of these programs in the utility's distribution revenue requirement, on the
electric side, and defer consideration of an electric rate increase until
the  rate freeze ends.?
?
The three utilities are directed, within 15 days, to file Advice Letters
increasing their electric distribution revenue requirements, without
modifying  current rates, to include the authorized program budgets.? In the
interim,  all program costs?are to?be tracked in balancing accounts, and the
utilities should establish such accounts for this purpose.? The utilities
are also?directed to implement these programs, "without delay."

Under the adopted programs, SDG&E will administer a  demand-responsiveness
pilot program, targeted to reach 5,000 residential  customers in its service
territory. SCE will administer a similar pilot program,  targeted to 5,000
small commercial customers. SDG&E and SCE will provide  financial incentives
to customers who agree to set their thermostats at  pre-specified levels.?
Through an internet interface, the utility will  monitor and verify actual
interruption of loads at the customer site and provide  interactive
information to customers about their electric usage, in order to  encourage
peak demand reduction.? Within certain parameters, customers will  have the
flexibility to override the thermostat settings, subject to  pre-specified
penalties.

The draft decision would?also authorize a pilot program to provide
interactive consumption and cost information to small customers, such as
historical energy bill information, representative energy usage and cost
information for common appliances, and tariff options. PG&E?is directed
to?contract with an independent web designer to develop a website that
provides customer online access to this information.??The  Commission's?goal
is to reach 10,000 to 15,000 customers in PG&E's  service territory.? The
program will be targeted to residential customers  with relatively high
monthly energy consumption, residential customers with  swimming pools, homes
and small businesses in the San Francisco peninsula or in  Silicon Valley,
and/or rural residences and small businesses.

The draft decision also proposes to implement a self-generation program
across all the utility service territories.? Under the program, financial
incentives will be provided to distributed generation technologies for
amounts  ranging from $1 - $4 per watt and 30-50% of total project cost,
depending on the  type of technology used.? There is a table on page 4 of the
draft decision  which shows the amounts of the incentives.?

The utilities are required to outsource to independent consultants or
contractors all program evaluation activities, and are encouraged to
outsource  as many other aspects of program implementation as possible.? All
installation of technologies (hardware and software) at customer sites will
be  done by independent contractors, and not utility personnel.? The
utilities  are encouraged to coordinate and work closely with local
governments,  community-based organizations and business associations to
recruit and contact  interested customers.
?
Dan
 - 3-15-01 Draft Interim Decision.doc


Steve, I understand that you are developing a campaign for California,
considering all of media attention that has been placed on this state.  I
publish a weekly deregulation report and it contains some information that
may prove useful.  The report is attached.

Frank


Please send out a reminder of the GE conference call to the following:

Sheila
Rose
Lisa
Scott
Mike Barnas
Kent shoemaker
steve swift
Ben jacoby

We don't need a conference room this week.

Thanks,

kay


Sheila,
	I have received a few phone calls from Utilicorp (Keith Milem) stating they are unhappy with the removal of Scheduled Quantity report. Not only do their schedulers use this report on a daily basis, their accounting personnel use it to tie out volumes at the end of the month.  Thanks.

Randy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Zadow, Raetta; Barry, Patrick; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Walden, Shirley; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Bastida, Nancy; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carrillo, Alma; Carter, Zuela; Dasilva, Esther; Davis, Larry; Eldridge, Dale; Green, Alma; Hanagriff, Richard; Johnson, Alice; Lee, Dennis; Steele, Patricia; Trevino, Linda; Vasquez, Josue; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, James; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Betancourt, Ramona ; Black, Legale ; Draemer, Mary ; Kuehl, Toby; Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry; Skertich, Gerald; Studebaker, James ; Summers, Toby; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Scheduled Qty Report

FYI:

Teams--Let me know if you've received calls from unhappy shippers regarding the removal of the "Scheduled Quantity reports for Shippers" in TMS!!  We've been getting miscellaneous messages that customers are unhappy with this change--need some immediate feedback!  Thks! Sheila


I f we get out of here early, I may run to Foley's.  I will leave you a voice
mail or an e-mail to let you know.So be sure to check.  I was just messing
withyou on the Evita.  I am going out to lunch with a customer today so I'm
not going to be extremely hungery.  Maybe we just go to PF Chang's and I can
have a lettuce wrap.


Has this previously been covered by the Office of the Chairman budget?  If
so, please handle; otherwise let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001
08:54 AM ---------------------------

"Nelson W. Cunningham" <ncunningham@mclarty.com> on 06/27/2001 01:09:46 PM
Please respond to <ncunningham@mclarty.com>
To: "J. Steven Kean \(E-mail\)" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Enron

Steve --

A question aimed far below your pay grade.  Our most recent invoice to Enron
(dating from April) has not yet been paid.  Our accountant, Paul Hart,
reports that the individual to whom we had previously been told to direct the
invoices says he is no longer the appropriate person to approve it.

Any guidance on to whom we should turn?

All the best,

Nelson
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hart [mailto:phart@ahartco.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Nelson Cunningham
Subject: Enron

Nelson:

We spoke to Enron's accounting dept who said that the invoice is still in
their system because James Derrick (whom all the previous invoices have been
sent) said that he is not the person to approve the payment. The accountant
asked me whom he sould direct the invoice to. Please let me know your
thoughts.

Paul