Rodney, if this deal is such a long put why did you push me into this process?

You should have made the call to kill it.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           10/17/2000 07:32 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: GE Plastics Facts

Dave, Marty,

In general moving the deal to just a Selkirk deal minimizes a lot of the
concerns surrounding centralized decision making etc.  The plant manager is
on board
as is Doron Grossman.  As a result the sales part should be largely completed
but the deal is far from closed.  I believe driving to closure with margin
with GE in 2000 will be a challenge.  I haved attached some information
regarding Marte's other questions and would be happy to discuss with the team.

David W Delainey
10/16/2000 09:42 AM
To: Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: GE Plastics Facts

Rodney, from what you told me it sounds like GE is willing to play on the
Selkirk asset so the sales cycle should be largely completed.  Can you answer
Marty's other questions?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
09:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Marty Sunde@EES on 10/15/2000 09:05 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Karen S
Owens@ees@EES, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GE Plastics Facts

Hi David,
I'll give you a response with the hope of seeing more information that would
change my mind.  If you are asking for my opinon, it is difficult to be
supportive of moving ahead on a transaction like this give the fairly
significant obstacles (these are usually deals killers) that Rodney
describes.  What I couldn't read into Rodney's write up were other
undocumented factors that you might change the probability, like:

Is there an Sr. executive champion that is willing to "influence" the GE
negotiating team into getting a deal done, even if the terms are less
desirable than what Rodney laid out as their requirements?
Are the willing to extned the term so that there isn't a capital tail?
Is there any real compelling motivation for this GE Plastics team to change
from current practice?  Do we know what that is and what the deadline for
action for change is?
Could Rodney suggest alternatives to address the obstacles and show the
potential impact on the margin in the deal?
Is there some other component of this deal that is so compelling to the
prospect that we can attach these pieces to that?

Realistically, based on what is written, the deal you are describing sounds
like it would have a low probability to close, surely in 2000.
HOWEVER< if there exenuating circumstances like you feel like we just need to
win this at all costs, there are values not being calculated that the client
would recognize, there are senior execs at GE Plastics behind this looking
for a way to close this, or anything else that is convincing your origination
team that they have a winner here....then, lets find out what that is and go
for it.

I wasn't exactly sure what you were asking for.  If it was my opinion, that
is above.  If it was to put more resource on it to try to make the
probability go up, I'll be glad to help.  If it is some other, just let me
know.

I would suggest we just start with trying to get more information from Rodney
and team regarding why they are convinced this can be contracted for with
margin in 2000.  I would love to participate and do what we can to make this
work out, as long as we all agree that there are reasonable approaches to
raising the probability of victory.

Thanks

David W Delainey@ECT
10/13/2000 09:47 AM
To: Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GE Plastics Facts

Guys, I would like your opinion on this potential transaction.  This has been
sold through GE for some time and it is reasonably likely that if we employed
some additional resources that this could be completed over the next quarter
or so.

Ultimately, Rodney and his team would like to see EES take control of the
deal with EIM folks staying involved to ensure continuity and to assist to
closure. Assuming that the sales process is largely completed, I see some
value for Enron to take this deal including:
 a) $200 M in TCV for 2000;
 b) $3 to $5 M in value;
 c) GE on our EES resume of companies which will help in future sales to the
large industrial customers;
 and d) provides an "in" to the GE family of companies which could result in
significant up-sell capability in the future if we provide a quality product.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           10/12/2000 07:37 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GE Plastics Facts

Dave,

The GE Plastics facility is located in Selkirk NY just south of Albany and
produces polystyrene and polyphenyleneoxide.  The deal value is roughly $4-5
million NPV of which $3-4 million may be markable income.

The obstacles to closure are:
- the projected savings have gone from 27% to 20% when GE said they wanted
more
- there is some capital recovery at the end of year ten that GE would have to
pay us and they are not yet agreeable to,
- the savings include $1 million in O&M savings and it will be very difficult
to get to closure with them letting us do the O&M

Deal Stats Are:

Electricity  230,000 mwh/yr  $12 million/yr
Steam  430,000 lbs/yr  $3   million/yr
Gas  470,000 mmbtu/yr $2   million/yr
O&M     $3   million/yr
Total     $20 million/yr

10 year contract, total contract value $200 million.

Let me know if you need any further information.
Thanks,
Rodney


Financial Desk
State's Utilities Could Be in Hot Water as Bills Are Due Power: Whether they
can collect funds for escalating costs is a question that worries Wall
Street, others.
CHRIS KRAUL

09/22/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page A-1
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
As the meter runs on California's electricity crisis, shock over this
summer's price spikes is giving way to a new concern: uncertainty over
whether and how the state's three investor-owned utilities can collect the
staggering amounts in power costs they haven't been allowed to pass through
to consumers.
The unanswered question is how high the bill--now $4 billion and
counting--will go, and whether consumers will foot all or part of it. And
that there are no easy answers--perhaps short of an overhaul of the state's
deregulated power market, or legislation from officials seemingly reluctant
to act--only adds to the growing anxiety.
Rate freezes in effect at Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric
and San Diego Gas & Electric, which serve about three-quarters of the state's
residents and businesses, are forcing the utilities to borrow an estimated $1
billion a month to cover their added wholesale costs. Those loans are
draining the companies' resources and threatening their financial structure,
analysts say.
The rising unpaid balance presents a longer-term burden that worries Wall
Street, the state's business interests and, of course, the utilities. If
passed along to consumers, the amount could ultimately negate the promised
benefits of cheap energy that were the reason for being for the landmark
deregulation of California's electricity industry. But making the utilities
absorb the entire "undercollections" would strike a grievous financial blow
to the companies.
The crisis also has created a potential time bomb for shareholders of parent
companies Edison International and PG&E Corp. Skyrocketing wholesale
electricity costs are canceling out deregulation's underlying assumption of
low-cost wholesale energy--and the projected generous retail margins with
which utilities were to pay off nuclear plants and other uneconomical assets.
The deregulation law gave utilities until March 2002 to complete the payoff,
when open-market conditions would take over in their service areas. But with
wholesale electricity costs where they are, the "stranded asset" balances are
growing instead of shrinking--and posing an enormous potential hit for
shareholders, who would have to absorb the remaining "bad asset" costs after
the deadline passes.
Whether the companies' shareholders or ratepayers--or both--end up footing
the undercollection bill, all Californians could pay in the long run,
analysts say, if current market problems remain unresolved and the state is
seen as a less attractive place in which to do business.
How will it all shake out? Wall Street is as much in the dark as
Californians, said Lori Woodland, an analyst with Fitch Inc. of Chicago, one
of three debt-rating agencies to recently lower their outlooks for Southern
California Edison, PG&E, SDG&E and their parent companies.
"It's not clear how regulators view this issue," Woodland said. "They may
permit the utilities to recover their costs [from ratepayers]; they may not.
That's a big uncertainty, and it may remain this way for months. Meanwhile,
power prices are very high, and significant amounts of money are flowing out
the door of the utilities."
The uncertain prospects for collecting those billions of dollars also affect
stock prices, and PG&E in particular has slumped in recent days as the
implications register with investors. From a high of $31.64 on Sept. 11, PG&E
shares have dropped to Thursday's close of $23.19 on the New York Stock
Exchange.
Amid the finger pointing and doubts, many wonder if electricity deregulation
itself could be junked and the state's power industry re-regulated. Others
suggest that rate freezes be extended indefinitely or hope that the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission now investigating the California electricity
market will take corrective action to make it all better.
Although the parties involved all seem fearful of the dimension of the crisis
and doubtful of any near-term solution, consensus couldn't be less evident
among the major players on how to deal with it. Although all three utilities
agree the current market isn't working, they have not come forward with a
common plan to solve the crisis and aren't working on one, sources say.
Partial lifting of the rate freezes is advocated by PG&E Corp. and Sempra
Energy, parent of SDG&E, the first state utility to pay off its stranded
costs and thus be allowed to fully pass along wholesale costs to customers.
The state Legislature has since stepped in to freeze SDG&E rates after a
political firestorm fed by customer protests over bills that doubled and even
tripled during the summer.
Lifting the rate freeze would stem the tide of electricity undercollections,
a sum the utilities realize is not necessarily collectible in the current
political climate.
"We have to fix these retail rates, which mask the true cost of electricity
and which are creating the shortfall," said SDG&E President Edwin A. Guiles.
In San Diego, for example, the average price paid by SDG&E customers zoomed
from 11 cents per kilowatt-hour last year to 28 cents at its highest point
this summer, before the Legislature stepped in to cap the rates, bringing the
average price paid down to about 10 cents.
So tinkering with the rate freeze could be politically hazardous.
"The pain we saw in San Diego this summer is something we want to avoid for
our customers in Northern and Central California," said PG&E spokesman Jon
Tremayne.
PG&E is expected soon to formally petition the state Public Utilities
Commission to lift its rate freeze. The San Francisco-based utility argues
that the $2.8-billion value of its Northern California hydroelectric
properties, which under deregulation it is required to divest, would erase
its stranded costs and make it eligible to pass along wholesale costs to
consumers.
Southern California Edison's chief financial officer, Jim Scilacci, said the
utility could possibly be eligible to lift the rate freeze later this year if
planned asset sales bring high enough prices.
But with the legally mandated rate freeze in effect in San Diego, observers
doubt that the state would let PG&E and Edison revert to market prices.
In response, some consumer advocates are saying, in effect: Let the
utilities, which ignored warnings of the electricity shortages at the root of
the summer's price spikes, lie in the beds they made and pay the unforeseen
costs of deregulation themselves.
"Essentially this is the result of a deal gone wrong. It's buyer's remorse,"
said Michael Shames of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San Diego
watchdog group. "The utilities cut a deal, and now they don't like the terms
of the deal and they want out of it."
Somewhat more flexible is Ed Yates, senior vice president of the
Sacramento-based California League of Food Processors, whose energy-intensive
industry could be devastated by the full brunt of high wholesale energy
costs.
"What frightens us is that the utilities and the state could declare the rate
freeze over and we'd have a San Diego situation," Yates said, referring to
how the rising summer power costs made some San Diego County agricultural
products noncompetitive. "What we want is rate stability. But I don't see a
solution. There are powerful interests at work who don't agree on the goal."
State officials are divided, with some including PUC President Loretta Lynch
looking to the federal government to impose order. Gov. Gray Davis has
discussed holding an energy summit next month to try to hash out solutions,
but no date or agenda have been set.
"The governor is obviously aware of the problems that California utilities
are facing and continues to be committed to making deregulation work and is
calling on everyone involved to act in a responsible way," said spokesman
Steve Maviglio, adding that Davis has set aside much of October to work on
the problem.
Lynch made it clear she will be unreceptive to any solution that would have
consumers absorbing all of the undercollections and that resolving the
utilities' huge debts must come as part of a comprehensive overhaul of
California's dysfunctional electricity market.
"I don't think there is a simple solution. The utilities have a problem, I
agree, but the resolution is much more complex than having the ratepayer eat
the bill," Lynch said. "The answer lies in a broader solution of addressing
the wholesale energy market."
Unclear is how long Wall Street would wait for some kind of resolution before
downgrading utilities' debt, the next step after the negative outlook
revisions.
"There are obviously many challenges presented to the power industry," said
Standard & Poor's David Bodek. "The costs are very high and at the end of the
day have to be borne by someone. If it's the utilities, there are financial
implications that could impact credit quality."


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042504.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: -725.00 / Final: -724.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: DETM
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   1.96 / Final:   1.93)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


FYI we sent this to treasury at their request.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kleb, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Garcia, Paul
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	NNG & TW Direct Cash Flow Estimate (11/27 -11/30)

Please find attached file. No major individual ($5.0 MM or greater) receipts or disbursements  anticipated over the last four days this month.


As you are aware, Enron utilizes temporary staffing services to satisfy
staffing requirements throughout the company.  For the past several months, a
project team, representing Enron,s temporary staffing users, have researched
and evaluated alternative Managed Services programs to determine which source
would best meet our current and future needs in terms of quality, performance
and cost containment objectives.  The Business Unit Implementation Project
Team members are:

Laurie Koenig, Operations Management, EES
Carolyn Vigne, Administration, EE&CC
Linda Martin, Accounting & Accounts Payable, Corporate
Beverly Stephens, Administration, ENA
Norma Hasenjager, Human Resources, ET&S
Peggy McCurley, Administration, Networks
Jane Ellen Weaver, Enron Broadband Services
Paulette Obrecht, Legal, Corporate
George Weber, GSS

In addition, Eric Merten (EBS), Kathy Cook (EE&CC), Carolyn Gilley (ENA),
Larry Dallman (Corp/AP), and Diane Eckels (GSS) were active members of the
Selection Project Team.

As a result of the team,s efforts, we are pleased to announce the beginning
of a strategic alliance with CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group.  This group
will function as a vendor-neutral management entity overseeing all staffing
vendors in the program scope. They will also provide a web based online
technology tool that will enhance the ordering and reporting capabilities.
The goal of our alliance with CORESTAFF is to make obtaining a temporary
worker with the right skills and experience easier while protecting the best
interests of the organization.

We plan to implement Phase I of this improvement effective January 2, 2001.
This Phase I of the implementation will encompass administrative/clerical
temporary workers at the Houston locations only. If you currently have
administrative/clerical temporary workers in your department, the enhancement
will not affect their position. In an effort to preserve relationships, all
current staffing vendors will be invited to participate in this enhanced
program.  CORESTAFF shares our commitment to minimize any disruptions in
service during this transition.

We expect to incorporate the administrative/clerical workers in Omaha,
Seattle and Portland in Phase II, which is scheduled for February, 2001.  The
scope and timing of any additional phases will be determined after these two
phases have been completed.

Realizing the impact that the temporary workforce has in business today, we
selected CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group based on their exceptional
management team, commitment to quality service, and creative solutions to our
staffing needs.  The relationship promises to offer Enron a cost effective
and simple means for obtaining temporary employees.

In the coming weeks, Enron and CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group will be
communicating to Enron,s administrative/clerical temporary staffing vendors
about the new process.

There are many benefits to this new Managed Services program, which are
outlined on the attached page.  More details on how to utilize CORESTAFF,s
Managed Services program will be announced soon and meetings will be
scheduled to demonstrate the reporting system and to meet the Managed
Services team.

What is Managed Services?

CORESTAFF,s Managed Services program includes:

? Vendor-neutral management model
? Equal distribution of staffing orders to all staffing partners
? Web-based application with online ordering, data capture and customized
reporting
? Benchmarking and performance measurement for continuous improvement
? Methodologies for accurate skill-matching and fulfillment efficiencies

Key Benefits

? More vendors working on each order from the outset ) faster access to
available talent pools
? Standardized mark-ups and fees to manage costs more effectively
? Online access to requisition status for users
? Robust databases offering managers enhanced tracking and reporting of
temporary usage and expenditures
? Standard and customized reporting capabilities -- online
? Tenured, experienced Managed Services team on-site to assist users in
accessing web site, identifying usage trends, preparing specialized reports,
etc.

Corestaff/Managed Services/Staffing

Joseph Marsh ) Lead / Operations (josephm@corestaff.com; 713-438-1400)
Amy Binney, Sharon B. Sellers ) Operations
Cherri Carbonara ) Marketing / Communications
Cynthia Duhon )Staffing Partner management


Paulo,

FYI. I shall lok at it at home as well.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:45 AM ---------------------------
From: Gillian Boyer@ENRON on 11/27/2000 10:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arthur Andersen model validation request

Vince,

                  Our goal is to validate that the Enron Global Market book
administrators are accurately using the "spread option model" as developed by
the Research Group.    To determine this, we would like to provide you with
the inputs for a particular deal (as provided by a Global Markets book
administrator) and have you recalculate the deal value.   We will then
compare your results to the values calculated by Global Markets.

 Two Koch deals have been chosen due to their substantial P/L effect.  I have
attached the deal data in two forms: (1) the spread option model that Kara
Boudreau, Book Administrator EGM, provided and (2) an excel spreadsheet that
isolates the 2 deals.

 If there is anything more that we could provide, please don't hesitate to
call me at  x30968.

 Thank you so much for all of your help.

 Gillian

1.

2.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Soto, Elizabeth
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Akers, Michelle; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bhatia, Randy; Bike, Anne; Bowen, Melba A.; Brady, Edward; Castillo, Michael; Cavazos, Amy; Chavez, Alejandra; Clause, Kristen; Couch, Greg; De La Torre, Cathy; Doan, Jad; Espey, Darren; Fowler, Kulvinder; Frank, Carole; Gonzales, Alexander R.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Grant, George; Green, Michael; Hernandez , Bertha Elizabeth; Hopkins, Stephanie; Hungerford, James; Johnson, Luchas; Jones, Brad; Jones, Monte; Keiser, Kam; Kulic, Sladana-Anna; Lee, Jennifer; Lilly, Kyle R.; Logan III, Jackson; Loibl, Kori; Love, Phillip M.; Mausser, Gregory A.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mills, Bruce; Nelson, Michelle; Olney, Matthew; O'Rourke, Ryan; Palmer, B. Scott; Pehlivanova, Biliana; Perich, Stephen; Rabon, Chance; Riordan, Sean; Romero, Araceli; Royed, Jeff; Ryder, Patrick; Severson, Russ; Singla, Kimat; Soto, Elizabeth; Sprowls, Cathy; Taylor, Matthew; Thibaut, Dan; Toward, Theresa; Underwood, David; Valdes, John; Vargas, Laura; Videtto, Melissa; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Worthing, Ashley; Yeboah, Richard
Subject:	FW:  Move Related Reminders...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Heather
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:22 AM
To:	Hennessy, Sonia; Romero, Araceli; Soto, Elizabeth; Gonzales, Alexander R.; Saldana, Alex; Jackson, Brandee; Showers, Digna
Subject:	 Move Related Reminders...

From Tammy Shepperd.... Asst's Please communicate the information below to your groups and remind them also, to make sure that
their desks are completely cleaned out, in preparation of those who will move behind them.  There should be NOTHING left in our areas
once we have been moved.

Thank you, Heather Choate
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
As you all know, our move is scheduled for this weekend.  Hopefully,  you and your groups are all progressing well in your preparations for the move this Friday. Please take the time to read the information contained in this message because most of the information contains reminders or FYI items and will be important to you and your group.  Please forward this to those in your group that may need this information.

?	Voicemail instructions - Please have everyone in your group clear all new voicemail messages by 5:00 PM, Friday, 11/16.  All saved messages, greetings and recorded names will be saved.  If a message is left before cutover the message will be saved, but the message light will not be displayed when you arrive.  As a precautionary meassure please check voice mail upon your arrival Monday morning even if the message light isn't on.

?	Building access - ECS will not be available for general access until Monday morning at 5:00 AM.  Due to the gas and power moves being combined, it is unlikely that the move team will be prepared for the POC's to come in on Sunday to unpack.  (Separate instructions will be generated for those who are needed to test trading applications.)  NOTE: Only those whose names have been approved and submitted to security will be allowed access on Sunday.
o	Monday - 5:00 AM for all employees

?	Security & badges -  All POC team members should be familiar with the routes into ECS as we discussed at our recent move meeting.  Please be sure to share this information with all of the people in your group.  If you need additional copies of the floor plans that have the access routes highlighted, please contact Carli Smith (5-3473). Please stress to everyone to have their badges with them at all times.  No one will be allowed access without their badge.  If anyone tries to access the building from the garage via the skyring and they do not have their badge, they will be sent back through the garage to the street level to walk across the street to the round kiosk in the Enron building lobby to get a guest pass and then proceed back to ECS via the 2nd floor and the skyring.

?	Move team colors - As mentioned at the move meeting, the following is a list of the color designations (vests) for the various teams that will be on the floor when we move in.
o	Red - Move Team
o	Orange - Desktop Support/IT
o	Green - Telephony

?	Newspaper subscriptions - The delivery location for all newspaper subscriptions need to be changed to ECS 05/06.  It is our intention to have all daily newspapers delivered to the mail desk located in the ECS 2nd floor corridor.  It will be the responsibility of the assistants to either pick up the papers for their group or designate someone in their group to pick up the papers.  If your papers continue to be delivered to your old floor of ECN, contact Sunny Rodgers (3-6116).

?	Move boxes -  Please encourage your group to pack and bring no more than about 6 boxes per person.  You may call Facilities (3-6300) if you need to request additional boxes.

?	Move labels -  If you run out of labels or if you are missing any labels, please call Carli Smith (5-3473) to have additional or missing labels printed.

?	Laptops - Important - Please ensure that all cable locks have been removed from all laptop computers by 5:00 PM on Friday.  If any cable locks are left on the computers they will be destroyed by the move team in order to move the computers as scheduled.

.	Bottled water - Every kitchen has an ice machine that also dispenses filtered water.  The large bottles of water (5 gallon) will not be allowed on the floor.  We would also like   to discourage the use of small bottles of water due to limited storage space and the availability of filtered water at several locations.

?	Phone sets - Although most of you are aware of this, we just wanted to remind you that there will be only one phone on each desk - either a turret or an Avaya, but not both.  Do not tag your phones, a new phone will be waiting for each person on their desk in the new building

I hope I have covered some of the outstanding questions or issues you might have, but if I have missed something, please let me know.  Thanks so much for all your help and hard work.


Hey Rob,

I am trying to create index products for Feb and I don't see the Jan products
to copy. I need HPL HSCX, HPL HSCX E, HPL Agua Dulce, HPL Thompsonville, and
Corpus Christi Pool.

Thanks,
Eric
x3-0977


Robert Amoroso
1503 - B Mimosa Dr.
Greensboro, NC 27403
bamoroso@wfubmc.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Robert Amoroso


Jim,

I shall be glad to talk to them.

Vince

James L Bouillion
04/24/2001 01:43 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CHARM

Vince, would you be agreeable to such a phone call, or would you prefer to
designate someone in your group?
---------------------- Forwarded by James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
01:41 PM ---------------------------

"Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> on 04/24/2001 01:40:06 PM
To: James.L.Bouillion@enron.com
cc: "Carl Groth" <groth_ch@willis.com>, "Kenneth Risko" <risko_kj@willis.com>
Subject: Re: CHARM

Jim,

Thanks for the feed-back. To assist in the further development of the
product, are there any specific areas your group would like to see improved
? Based on comments made during our meeting, it sounded like your main
concern was whether or not CHARM would have the capacity to cover the very
different and complex risk areas that your company is involved in. Would
you mind if someone from our CHARM group called you or Mr. Kaminski for
some specific comments ?

Regards,

Bertil

James.L.Bouillion@enron.com on 04/24/2001 01:35:09 PM

To:   Bertil Olsson/Hou/US/WCG@WCG
cc:
bcc:

Subject:  Re: CHARM

Bertil, I again wish to thank you for the presentation on the CHARM
product.  The response from the group is that the model requires more work
before Enron could consider it as a commercial product.  Please keep me
advised as I assume that you will continue to develop the model.

James L Bouillion
04/11/2001 06:50 AM

To:   "Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject:  Re: CHARM  (Document link: James L Bouillion)

No word yet.  I will follow up with the attendees.

Thanks for taking thje time to make the presentation.

"Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> on 04/10/2001 04:07:11 PM

To:   James.L.Bouillion@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: CHARM

Jim,

Any feed-back on our meeting ? We certainly appreciated the opportunity and
the fact that the meeting was very interactive.

Regards,

Bertil

______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender
immediately.  You should not retain, copy or use this email for any
purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.

______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender
immediately.  You should not retain, copy or use this email for any
purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.


Just confirming - this is DIP money.  If so, use acct 4078-1075  Enron North America

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:33 PM
To:	Perkins, Mary
Cc:	Birmingham, Mary; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	ENA Wire instructions
Importance:	High

Mary,
Do you have an Enron North America Corp. bank account I can use for Goldman Sachs.  The hedge book is in a grouping of accounts under ENA.  In the past, we have wired to ECT Investments Inc.'s Citibank account but this is probably not a good idea at this time.

The amount is $985,614.39.

Please advise.
Sheila


Ladies & Gentlemen,

Please review the attached powerpoint presentation for our conference call on
Thursday at 1:30 CDT.  The slides demonstrate the new look & screenflow
proposed for enron.com as well as the text descriptions proposed for each of
your business areas.  I will walk through this during the call to elaborate
on the new design & how a visitor would navigate through enron.com to get to
your individual business units.

I am looking for your explicit approval of the content paragraphs before this
is shown to Stan Horton and other CEO's/Chairmen around the company.  This
new look & content will replace today's enron.com by June 30.  I look forward
to speaking with you soon.


Doug,

We just need your authorization to set him up in the system. Please disregard previous message regarding products.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lozano, Melba
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Cc:	Oh, Seung-Taek; Meredith, Kevin; Sever, Stephanie
Subject:	Access to trade

Doug,

In order for us to set up Seung-Taek to trade online, we need a list of products which he will be managing.

Thank you,

Melba
58986


Henger's summary of the major cases discussed at FERC's October 24th Meeting:

	JOHN & HENGERER
	A LAW PARTNERSHIP
	1200 17TH STREET, N.W.
	SUITE 600
	WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-3013

DOUGLAS F. JOHN	TELEPHONE
EDWARD W. HENGERER	(202) 429-8815
KEVIN M. SWEENEY
KIM M. CLARK	TELECOPIER
GORDON J. SMITH	(202) 429-8805
MATTHEW T. RICK
ELIZABETH A. ZEMBRUSKI

	October 24, 2001

Via Internet
MEMORANDUM

TO:		Interested Clients

FROM:		John & Hengerer

RE:		Commission Meeting -- October 24, 2001

At today's lengthy Commission meeting, the Commissioners approved the consent agenda and then discussed the items detailed below.

ELECTRIC MATTERS

State Participation in RTO Development Process
In light of comments voiced during last week's RTO workshops, Commissioner Brownell
suggested that avenues for participation by the State Commissions in the RTO development process need to be explored.  She suggested that one option might be to establish regional panels made up of state commission representatives.  Commissioner Brownell further suggested that state commissions, perhaps through such regional panels, could explore issues related to RTO set-up, adequacy of revenue requirements, demand-side management programs, market monitoring and mitigation, and distributed generation.

The other Commissioners generally echoed Commissioner Brownell's sentiment, although Commissioner Massey cautioned that the pace of RTO development should not be slowed by excessive or redundant administrative procedures and costs.  The Commissioners unanimously voted to instruct Staff to develop proposals for greater state commission involvement, and to present their proposals to the Commissioners at an upcoming agenda meeting.  At this point, the initiative appears to be designed to explore alternatives.  More concrete proposals, however, could be included in the broader RTO strategy the Commission is expected to announce in the near future.

Discussion of RTO Development Process in Southeast, Docket No. EX02-1
Staff began the discussion with a power point presentation on the Southeast RTO mediation process, noting that participants had reached a consensus on most issues, including market monitoring, operational authority, short-term reliability, and planning.  Staff explained that consensus could not be reached on issues of governance and independence and provided an overview of the two competing RTO Models outlined in the Judge McCartney=s mediation report.  After briefly describing the Collaborative Governance (CG) model and Independent System Administrator (ISA) model, Staff identified positives and negatives for both.  Staff did not take a position on which model should be approved by FERC; rather, it concluded that either model satisfies the requirements of Order No. 2000.  Staff also noted that in the Southeast, participation by public power is essential to the formation of a functioning RTO in the region.

After Staff=s presentation, Judge McCartney and Herbert Tate (former New Jersey Chairman) discussed the proceeding with the Commissioners.  Specific issues discussed included: public power participation, concern over independence in the ISA model, whether the ISA was analogous to current ISOs, and the allocation of functions in the CG model.  Overall, Judge McCartney expressed support for CG model, citing concerns over independence in the ISA model as well as, what she viewed as, the experimental nature of the ISA proposal.  As a former state commissioner, Mr. Tate outlined the concerns expressed by the state commissions during the mediation period.  In their final recommendations, both Judge McCartney and Mr. Tate encouraged the Commission to provide additional guidance as to the essential elements or principles to structure RTOs.

Discussion of RTO Developments in the Northeast, Docket No. EX02-2
Staff began this discussion item with a presentation on the Northeast RTO mediation process.  Staff explained that a Business Plan was issued to implement the Northeast RTO.  The Business Plan consists of eight sections: post-mediation process, governance, market design, operations, technology assessment, transmission tariff-related issues, regional transmission planning, and interregional coordination.  Staff did not detail the content of the Business Plan, but noted that in the two areas where there was disagreement B governance and market design options B the plan included three alternatives for each.

Staff=s presentation was followed by a discussion with Judge Young and Joe Garcia (former Florida Commissioner).  Judge Young explained that the Business Plan provides a viable blueprint for the formation of the Northeast RTO.  He noted that several issues must still be resolved, including: governance, market design, and shareholder process.  Judge Young reiterated his recommendation that a independent, non-vendor expert should analyze the technology of the three ISOs to assess whether entirely new software will be necessary to implement the Northeast RTO.  In response to Commissioner Breathitt, Staff explained that software is one of the biggest hurdles in the Northeast RTO.  Mr. Garcia expressed some concern that the ALJ and participants could waste too must time attempting to achieve the perfect RTO.

Chairman Wood noted that the Commission=s intention is to leave the region better, not worse off, than pre-RTO.  He also explained that the Northeast is in a better position to form a viable RTO than the other regions because of the maturity of its markets.  Commissioner Brownell noted that inconsistencies between the existing ISOs are working against retail competition programs in the Northeast region.  She cautioned against proceeding too slowly with regard to RTO formation.  Commissioner Wood noted that there are some issues that can be resolved relatively quickly, for example, regional transmission planning, real-time imbalance market software.

In response to Chairman Wood, the Judge Young and Mr. Garcia provided recommendations.  Mr. Garcia explained that the Business Plan provided participants with a basic plan and asked the Commission to provide guidance in the areas were there was divergence.  He also encouraged the Commission to issue a decision in the near future, noting that the Commission should let parties litigate jurisdictional issues so that RTO issues could be resolved sooner rather than later.  Judge Young encouraged the Commission to take the time to assess market design in order to prevent a further waste of time and money in the likelihood that the chosen market design proves unworkable.  Judge Young also requested that the Commission provide additional guidance on the parameters of Abest practices,@ governance structure, market design, and stakeholder process.
Discussion of RTO Developments in the Midwest, Docket No. EX02-3
Staff provided an update of recent developments in the Midwest.  A settlement agreement between Alliance and MISO, approved by the Commission earlier this year, provides the basis for developing a seamless market in the region that will be served by the two groups.  Under the terms of the Illinois power settlement, the financial viability of MISO is guaranteed, the Alliance business model is preserved, and seams issues between MISO and Alliance are addressed.   Staff explained that the seams agreement provides for one-stop shopping, congestion information on a joint bulletin board, an imbalance market, transmission planning, and market monitoring.

Staff explained that both MISO and Alliance recently filed status reports with the Commission addressing their ability to be functional and the seams agreement included in the settlement previously approved by the Commission.  Alliance noted that a proposal by National Grid USA (EL01-80-01) to manage the Alliance RTO, along with Alliance's's proposed Business Plan, are critical to the RTO's start-up.  Alliance reports that it would take up to 120 days to initiate operations once it has received final Commission approval.

In response to Commissioner Brownell, Staff maintained that both MISO and Alliance have made progress in addressing seams issues.  Staff expressed satisfaction with both the substance and timing of the entities filings.

There was some discussion over the division of functions between MISO and Alliance.  Chairman Wood noted that, if there is going to be one regional entity with not for-profit and for-profit entities, the Commission will have to address how the functions should be split.  Chairman Wood also expressed concern that a viable wholesale market may not result if all the functions were delegated to the for-profit entity.

Discussion of Western Infrastructure Adequacy Conference, Docket No. AD01-2
First in a series of regional meetings on infrastructure, the Western Infrastructure Adequacy Conference will be held in Seattle on November 2, 2001.  Staff identified three main questions to be addressed at the meeting:  (i) whether the current infrastructure is adequate; (ii) the infrastructure needs of the region, and (iii) the factors that are inhibiting adequate investment in infrastructure.  Such questions will be addressed within the context of the outlook for growth and population increases in the region as well as the outlook for future energy needs.  The Commission hopes to determine what the states and the federal government can do to encourage infrastructure investment.

Next, Staff gave a power point presentation on the infrastructure throughout the United States.  This presentation, which breaks down energy infrastructure by fuel use and price-responsive demand, can be accessed by the public on the Commission=s website under AFERC Discussion Papers.@  Staff noted that gas is the primary fuel in West and that use of gas continues to rise within the region.  In a separate presentation, Staff then presented its findings on its western infrastructure assessment which began in August.  Staff has collected data and analyzed information on Western infrastructure, with a final assessment available Friday, October 26, 2001.

The western infrastructure assessment was broken into three sections: demand, supply, markets, and transmission.  With regard to demand, Staff traced the population and consumption differences over past few years in the West.  Staff noted that the Southwest started to consume larger amounts of gas and electricity because of population and economic growth.  Staff traced gas uses, growth, total capacity, and peak loads within Western region, as well as projections for demand, capacity, use, and infrastructure.  Next, Staff provided an overview of the supply of electricity, hydropower and gas in the United States.  Staff asserted that proven and potential gas reverses in United States could provide supply for next 50 years.  In the portion of the presentation on markets, Staff identified the primary trading hubs in the West and the average monthly spot market prices and monthly trading volumes in the region. Staff also noted that recently, there has been a downward shift in the gas futures market for the West which it attributed to lower temperatures, more capacity, lower gas prices and the Commission=s price mitigation plan.  Finally, Staff provided an overview of transmission projects in the Western region.

New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER01-2967
Cinergy Services, Inc., Docket Nos. ER01-2984 and ER01-3022
Commonwealth Edison Company, Docket ER01-2985
American Electric Power Service Corp., ER01-2163
In a July 2001 order in Docket No. ER01-2163, the Commission denied a transmission provider=s request to receive interest on system upgrade payments.  In this draft order, the Commission issued an interim order which granting rehearing on this issue.

The Commission will address the issue of interest on system upgrade payments in the generic proceeding addressing transmission interconnection.  Commissioner Breathitt dissented in part, maintaining that the Commission should not issue an interim order, but, instead should address the issue in the transmission interconnection proceeding where the ramifications can be more fully explored.  Commissioner Massey and Wood voiced their support for the order, noting that if generators are treated as banks, they should receive interest.  However, Commission Massey explained that as a long-term issue, he has an open mind as to how the generation costs should be allocated.

Kern River Gas Transmission Company, Docket Nos. CP01-70 and CP01-31
There was no Staff presentation on these two items which were placed on the discussion agenda by Commissioner Breathitt.  Although she concurred with the decision, Commissioner Breathitt expressed concern over intervenors allegations that the pipeline expansion would negatively impact the availability of take-away capacity on the Kern River system.  Commissioner Breathitt noted that in determining whether pipeline expansions are in the public convenience and necessity, the Commission must address concerns that there will be a degradation of existing shippers firm rights.

F:\Word\02\MEMO\FM102401 eaz.wpd


This is a draft that Jeanne did responding to Roger.  San Diego has inflated
their revenue requirement for 2001, as evidenced by a $200 million
overcollection in their 2002 filing.

I will submit an RCR for this.  We can hold off filing until we get approval.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 11/16/2000 12:34:57 PM
To: "'mpetroch@enron.com'" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "'ryang@enron.com'"
<ryang@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Petition for Modification of SDG&E ATCP Decision

Mona / Roger ----

Attached is a draft of the petition for modification to SDG&E ATCP Decision
adopting a $115 million CTC Revenue Requirement for 2001.  It is incomplete
as we need to talk about two items:

(1) if we ask the Commission to modify the $115 million revenue requirement
-- are we proposing something in its stead? Are we asking the Commission to
require SDG&E to file a new proposal???

(2)  In Decision 00-09-040 the Commission authorized SDG&E to establish a
subaccount in the TCBA to record any undercollections from its rate ceiling.
It also authorized SDG&E to offset those undercollection against any
revenues from SONGS, QFs, etc.  In its advice letter implementing the
commission's directive, SDG&E has stated that the shortfall in the new
subaccount will be reduced "by the portion of the monthly TCBA
overcollections allocated to eligible customers a defined in Rule 1"Energy
Rate Ceiling" (i.e., only the portion of the CTC overcollection attributable
to customers under the rate ceiling will be used to offset the rate ceiling
undercollection). In short, SDG&E is not attempting to use the CTC revenue
overcollected from large customers to offset commodity undercollections from
small customers.  Does this make a difference to our  wanting to go for
modification?

We should talk about these items.

 <<X18426.DOC>>

Jeanne

 - X18426.DOC


An adjustment is required on the Tufco contract for July 2000.  The volume
for the 23rd was overstated by 5,000.  This resulted in revisions on the 23rd
and 28th.  Please see the attached Tufco.  If you have any questions, give me
a call @ 36905.

D


Thank you for letting me know. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jeff A Sokoloff <jeffsok@juno.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jeff+20A+20Sokoloff+20+3Cjeffsok+40juno+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	James_Derrick@enron.com; hreasoner@velaw.com; ssusman@susmangodfrey.com
Subject:	John Sutton and Jurisprudence Luncheon

I just spoke to John Sutton, who was calling from his home in Austin.

He asked that I inform you that he regrets that he will be unable to
attend the Jurisprudence Luncheon.  He was very much looking forward to
it, and visiting with you.  Unfortunately he just brought his wife home
from the hospital, where she had been treated for pneumonia, and needs to
stay with her at the present time.

Jeff Sokoloff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


Dan,

Please be advised that "Hoegh Galleon" have reported loosing water on stb
boiler.  Stb boiler is now closed down for investigation.  The vessel has
indication in that the superheater is leaking steam/water.  The chief eng. will
inspect the boiler as soon as possible after the boiler has been cooled down and
ready for entering (within 4 - 5 hrs).   Reverting as soon as anything known.

The vessel is now steaming on one boiler, doing abt 13 knots.  We still expect
to have eta Lake Charles on the 9th morning.  Confirming eta Lake Charles as
soon as the inspection is carried out.

Best regards

Kjell
Hoegh LNG


Mike, I spoke to Ralph and he gave me an open week of April 17th in San
Francisco.  He thought that one day would be more that adequate.  I need to
have somebody contact the PG&E side for their availablity during that week.
Should I or someone else contact Rod Bosche or let Louie do this from his end
with our legal contacting their legal?

Some of the highlights that I had requested to Ralph for his presentation was
the following:

  PCB's are a contaminant, just as benzene is, which occurs naturally in the
gas.  Health issues of PCBs in pipeline are not a concern especially from a
customer and employee standpoint (the name PCB lends itself to public outcry
of the unknown)

 Removal of PCB's is best accomplished by managing liquids, not deconing

 Fiilter separators are a proven method of PCB removal

 Transwestern's proactive assistance with SoCal on their system to manage
their PCBs

 Most pipelines on the east coast have PCB's and no adverse environmental
impacts have occurred

Michel Nelson
03/28/2000 09:18 AM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@Enron, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William
Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Ralph Komai, Training Presentation

Excellent - If possible, I would wish to attend, as well. I approve the
expense and hourly rate. Might be the bargain of the century. Mike

Larry Campbell
03/28/2000 08:47 AM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@Enron, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William
Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Ralph Komai, Training Presentation

I spoke with Ralph Komai, PCB expert for SoCal, concerning his availability
to conduct a training session for PG&E and enlighten them on the reality of
PCB's in natural gas pipelines.  He has stated that he would be available to
do this as long as Transwestern picks up his expenses and hourly rate
($200.00/hr).  As per your approval, Louie, I will inform Ralph that we are
in agreement with his conditions and I will schedule a day when he would be
available in California to put on the training for PG&E.


Please see attached spreadsheet.

Jeff Gilliam


Anne:  Thanks for your voice mail.  We would like to generate the master.
I'll try to have it emailed on Monday.  Regards.  Sara


The Product is as follows:

William Stuart on the FX desk will offer the Product to Enron canada Corp on
an internal basis only. The GTC will be an 'internal only' GTC that we use
that tells any external customer that may inadvertantly access the internal
trade that the transaction is freserved for internal trading only; the only
radio button will be a "REJECT GTC", which further prevents an external
customer from transacting.

Stuart will post a Fixed Price price that represents the USD/CAD Exchange
rate on Trade Date. The Fixed Amount will be a CAD amount equal to volume
multiplied by Fixed Price. The Floating Amount will be a CAD Amount equal to
the volume multiplied by the Index, where the Index is a Floating Price equal
to the USD/CAD.

There are several arguments as to whether this should be classified as a
Forward or a Financial transaction. Our effort was to arrive at something
that would be easily understood by the market in the event that we begin to
offer this product externally.

The full Product description is attached. Please go in and offer your
approval.

Dale
3-9746


I will be out of the office on Monday,but am available the rest of the week
for a conference call, except from 2:30 - 3:00 on Wednesday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:20 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net; wmonjoy@brunini.com
Subject: MDEA et al and Enron transaction

Gentlemen,

Could we schedule some time for a conference call next week?  I would
appreciate the opportunity to work through some of the legal issues.  I
have the lofty goal of not working Memorial Day weekend this year, so I'm
trying to get as much done on this deal as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Kay

PS.  I'm open Tues am and most of Wednesday.  I can probably work my
schedule so that I'm available quite a bit of next week.


I was told to RSVP to you for the Christmas Party . My wife Ann South and
Myself Steve South Will attend. I am ENA gas trading


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001
07:29 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey@EES
07/05/2001 05:24 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT
cc:

Subject: Regulatory Policy Committee

Guys, we have a unique capability at this time (ie) me in EES and Greg in EWS
to have a singular voice in the regulatory market.  I would recommend a
policy committee be formed including Greg, Dave, Janet Dietrich, John
Lavorato, Tim Belden, Kevin Presto, Rick Shapiro and Steve Kean that meets on
a regular basis to review and approve our regulatory agenda, policy and
tactical moves on a regular basis.

Thoughts.....?

Regards
Delainey


Thanks for the updates.
If you have any more customer calls please send them to me if you need to.

Thanks DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carr, James
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 6:54 AM
To:	Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley; Callans, Nancy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Barry, Patrick; Washington, Kathy; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	Spraggins, Gary
Subject:	RE: TRAILBLAZER OUTAGE

Darrel attached is an e-mail sent out to the North Team approved by Gary concerning the Trailblazer outage.  Gary did not plan on posting the rescheduled Trailblazer outage for Nov. 8, since it will not affect throughput.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carr, James
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley; Callans, Nancy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Barry, Patrick; Washington, Kathy
Cc:	Spraggins, Gary
Subject:	RE: TRAILBLAZER OUTAGE REVISION

This is a correction to the Trailblazer outage, the outage has been rescheduled for Nov. 8 and is an outage on NNG side of the pipe.
Per Gary this outage has been worked out between both Trailblazer and our Gas Controls to not affect throughput.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carr, James
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley; Callans, Nancy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Barry, Patrick; Washington, Kathy
Subject:	RE: TRAILBLAZER OUTAGE

This information is for internal use only, Gary Spraggins is not going to post this outage on our Web. Site.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carr, James
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley; Callans, Nancy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Barry, Patrick; Washington, Kathy
Subject:	TRAILBLAZER OUTAGE

The outage planned at Trailblazer Beatrice Point 1318 for Oct. 30 has been rescheduled for Nov. 6 by NGPL.  This is a 16 hours outage on NGPL side of the pipe and is not a NNG outage. This information was supplied by Gerry Graves of System Planning.

James


Dude:
If I don't see you, good luck this weekend, have fun, and congratulations.
Very cool deal.  And remember, be true.

Best,
Jeff


Tana,

I have sent a confidentiality agreement to their CFO. We are awaiting
execution.


Dear Mike:

I wanted to let you know the status of your artwork, "The Blue Note."  We
should receive the artwork in-house latest Friday.  By the middle of this week
I should know the exact edition number for you.  I will keep you updated.  Do
you want us to frame the artwork here or ship it to you unframed?

Warmest regards,

Virginia Repasky
Christopher-Clark Fine Art


Please find the attached status update.

Regards,
Brian


John -

Do you want me to start having Total commodity V@R for Natural Gas on the morning reports? (inclusive of natural gas positions that power and other groups have on). I have noticed that we have V@R violations based on the new risk management policy to take all gas positions company wide into a V@R number.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Story, S. Craig
Cc:	Bradford, William S.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Bp Amoco and Coral

Jeff
The Amoco netting Agreement has been finalized and will be circulated for signature tomorrow as soon as I get execution sets from their attorney.  On the Coral side, the EEI and Guaranty issues have been agreed to and documentation will be executed no later than tomorrow.  My understanding from Harlan Murphy, a colleague of mine, is that Coral is NOT requiring the Netting Agreement in order to do the ring trades.

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 01:04
PM ---------------------------

Stuart Zisman
12/16/99 12:58 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: No Weekends, Extend to August '04

---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 12:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           12/16/99 12:54 PM

To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: No Weekends, Extend to August '04

No Weekends, Extend to August '04

Thanks,
Rodney


I understand.   If I have too, I will dip into my money.   I think the requests are reasonable and fair with respect to individual's peer group.

-----Original Message-----
From: gregwhalley <8777865122@skytel.com>@ENRON [mailto:gregwhalley <8777865122@skytel.com>@ENRON]
Sent: Sat 1/19/2002 12:31 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:
Subject: Money

We are going to have to work on making this money work. Several things have to balance out.


Vince,

I must apologize.  I have not had time to look over the proposal in any
detail.  When I first spoke with your friend, it was apparent that he was
still pre-business plan stage.  He has since sent me some ideas and
information.  I think the concept has merit, but there are so many political
issues that I am concerned about the ultimate business viability.

Give me the weekend to look over the information.

Thanks,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Blood Bank

Mark,

Any further thoughts on the blood bank concept?
Please, let  me know if I can be helpful?

Vince


Good morning,

I hope everyone has recovered from the party last Friday.  I think we
definitely have maintained our 'best party of the year' status.  It was a
great night!

To wrap everything up, we want to get the names of our donors to the Calgary
Herald as soon as possible.  We are hoping to have the Herald run the full
page ad showing our sponsors next SATURDAY.  That means that I need you to
make any final phone calls to donors by the end of this week, Monday at the
VERY LATEST.

Please send the names, money, etc. to Kelly.  If you have someone who is
confirmed but will not donate until later, we will put them in the ad.

Kelly, Lauch, Sheila, Shannon/Micheline, Jim, Mike, Bill and Chris can
confirm this, but I think we had about $225,000.00 in the bank the night of
the party, we made about $5,000.00 on the balloons, $8,000.00 on the silent
auction, $18,000.00 on the ticket sales and Sheila just received a large
donation $10,000.00 (?) from CanOxy (I think).  So, it looks like we're at
over $260,000.00 now.  Great job everyone.  It was really wonderful to be a
part of such a successful night!

Thanks again for all your hard work, and get those names in to Kelly,

 Elizabeth Stock

 - att1.htm


Thanks Jeff,  I am planning a business trip to San Fransisco with Stephanie Miller towrards the end of August... are you around.

I will check on dates but it should be the end of Aug.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Socal Storage Projects

They are selling gas from Montebello.

They have been given authority by the PUC to begin taking steps to sell from the remaining two (Alsio and La Goleta), but the PUC left some issues (principally around ratemaking) open, and have not given them the authority to actually begin selling the gas.  SoCal would like to start selling around Oct. 1, so they're expecting (hoping for) a decision in early September.  However, the state-run consumer group (ORA) and TURN have asked the Commission to require SoCal to retain two-thirds of the gas and sell it to the core at book value--unclear where the Commission will come out on that.

If there's anything else, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Socal Storage Projects

Can you provide the West Desk with an update on the Socal Storage projects-Socal Montebello Salvage Project ;Alsio Canyon and Lo goleta Cushion Gas Projects  Would like to  have something by this afternoon if possible.


In order to support Enron,s development of new business and desire to
maximize its return on invested capital; the following organizational changes
are taking place.
The current accounting groups supporting CALME, APACHI and South America
activities will be consolidated into one accounting group at Enron Corp.
This group will continue to provide accounting support to these international
regions and related Enron Corp initiatives.   Jeff Sommers, currently CALME
Vice President and CAO will head this accounting group.  Cassandra Schultz,
currently APACHI Vice President and CAO will join Rick Buy,s Risk Assessment
and Control Organization as a Vice President in Market Risk Management.  Kent
Castleman, currently South America Vice President and CAO will become Vice
President and CAO of Enron Industrial Markets.
Please join us in congratulating everyone in their new assignments.


These are the name overlays to date for the April 2001 reporting period.  The
most recent is the change from Sceptre Energy Inc. to CanNat Energy Inc.  For
details, please refer to the bottom tab April 2001.

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT on Fri, Apr 6.


I don't see how you get the numbers.  Can you please explain.  I don't have
the time to do this right now and I have to get the email off to the people
about sleeping arrangements.  I get 8 in one house and 5 in the other.
Please answer ASAP.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 11:22 AM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: Directions

oh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  In the "big" house, sleeps 10---3 kings
and 2 twins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  In the "little" house,
sleeps 6--2 queens and 1 trundle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

anything else!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cameron

Sellers              To:     "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"

<cameron@perf        <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

ect.com>             cc:

Subject:     RE: Directions

12/12/2000

01:18 PM

NO.  I need to know how many beds there are total!!!!!!!!!!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:           Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:           Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:51 AM
To:        Cameron Sellers
Subject:        RE: Directions

naked, all in one bed.

star doesn't need a bed.  prentice and i will need a bed (hey, it's her
birthday!)  tom & karen are very iffy, but if they show, and stay overnight
(iffy times two), then they'll need a bed.  that work?


Lee,

On deal 413447 (Chevron @ Olefins), we have a flex nom of 6,000 to
12,000/day.  Is this a monthly nom or daily nom?  Will we have a swing deal
with them for the winter?  The current swing deal is for Oct only.  For Oct,
they have pulled an average of 16,000/day.

D


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Jason Peters@ENRON
	06/26/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Corp. Guaranty - Physical and Financial

Carol,

Credit has sent for our review, a Guaranty which covers obligations under
both physical transactions and financial transactions.  Sara mentioned that
you were working on a form Guaranty for this type of scenario.  Could you
e-mail a copy of that form to me?

Thanks,

Jason


Start Date: 1/30/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013015.txt


The above referenced meeting has been rescheduled for 8:00 p.m. tonight.  If you are unable to stay, please dial-in.  The numbers are listed below.  A thousand apologizes for the last minute notice.

						Domestic dial-in # 800.713.8600
						Int'l dial-in # 801.983.4017
						Passcode # 54536

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley
Office of the Chairman
Enron Corporation
Tel.   713.853.1935
Fax   713.853.1838

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Liz
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Frevert, Mark; McMahon, Jeffrey; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Derrick Jr., James; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Colwell, Wes; Rieker, Paula; Tilney, Elizabeth; Olson, Cindy; Oxley, David; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Fallon, Jim; Haedicke, Mark E.; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Mcconnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Leff, Dan; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod; McCarty, Danny; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark; Joyce, Mary; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Garland, Kevin; Stanley, Brian; Metts, Mark
Cc:	Fleming, Rosalee; Daw, Nicki; Ford, Sue; Heathman, Karen K.; Westbrook, Sharron; Harris, Stephanie J ; McVicker, Maureen; Valencia, Laura; Tijerina, Shirley; Johnson, Kelly; Power, Bobbie; Clyatt, Julie; Schiller, Marsha; Marshall, Lucy; Elbertson, Janette; Schoppe, Tammie; Brooks, Loretta; Phillips, Cathy; Burns, Jennifer; Chapman, Kay; Stark, Cindy; Blackwood, Connie; Armstrong, Julie; Spiller, Tina; Wright, Teresa; Costello, Lisa; Valdez, Christina; Campos, Kathy; Hiltabrand, Leslie; Brown, Ruth Ann; Rushing, Rebekah
Subject:	Management Meeting - Wednesday, November 7 @ 6:30 p.m. in ECN 49C1

There will be a management meeting in ECN 49C1 @ 6:30 p.m.  Please notify me only if you are unable to attend.

		Int'l dial-in number# 801.983.4017 (for John Sherriff & Michael Brown)
		Passcode # 54536

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley
Office of the Chairman
Enron Corporation
Tel.   713.853.1935
Fax   713.853.1838


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		3/17/2000
Task Start Date:	3/17/2000


The information was released yesterday.  The total revenue requirement is down reflecting lower power costs. Presumably, current rates (including the $40/MWh increase since 1/1/01) are now sufficient to cover power costs and some amount for past undercollections.

Not sure what it assumes regarding agreement-in-principal contracts (i.e., whether they are in or out).

Alan Comnes


Enron has agreed that the key issue is to focus on solving the S-T buying
needs.  Attached is a spreadsheet that outlines the $ magnitude of the next
few months.

TALKING POINTS:

Lot's of questions about DWR becoming the  vehicle for S-T buying and there
is a significant legal risk for it becoming the vehicle.  WE DO NEED
SOMETHING TO BRIDGE BEFORE WE PUT IN L-T CONTRACTS.
Huge and growing shortfall ($3.2B through March 31, 2001)
The SOONER YOU CAN PUT IN L-T CONTRACTS STOP THE BLEEDING.
Bankruptcy takes all authority out of the Legislature's hands.

ACTION ITEMS:

1. Energy Sales Participation Agreement During Bankruptcy

Michael Tribolet will be contacting John Klauberg to discuss how to organize
a Participation Agreement to sell to UDCs in Bankruptcy while securing Super
Priority.

2. Legislative Language for CDWR (?) Buying Short-Term

Sandi McCubbin / Jeff Dasovich will lead team to offer new language to meet
S-T requirements of UDCs.  Key is to talk with State of California Treasurer
to see if the $ can be found or provided to private firms.  ($3.5B by end of
April).  Pat Boylston will develop "public benefit" language for options
working with Mike Day.  He can be reached at 503-294-9116 or
pgboylston@stoel.com.

3. Get Team to Sacramento

Get with Hertzberg to discuss the options (Bev Hansen).  Explain the
magnitude of the problem.  Get Mike Day to help draft language.

4. See if UDCs have any Thoughts

Steve Kean will communicate with UDCs to see if they have any solutions or
thougths.  Probably of limited value.

5. Update List

Any new information on this should be communicated to the following people as
soon as possible.  These people should update their respective business units.

ENA Legal - Christian Yoder / Travis McCullough
Credit - Michael Tribolet
EES - Vicki Sharp / Don Black
ENA - Tim Belden / Philip Allen
Govt Affairs - Steve Kean / Richard Shapiro


Hello, I searched in Enpower and I do not see any financial trades that we
have done with TransAlta Energy Marketing.  We may have done nymex trades
with them.  These trades would be in TAGG.  It is possible that TransAlta is
on the list that Sara and I have been using because of a nymex trade.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


Chris,

What information is needed for the exhibits to the Coral agreement?  I don't
remember.


Dear Vince,

I am writing to bring to your attention a GSIA student, John Gordon, who is
currently being considered for Enron's Associates program.  My understanding
is that Mark Courtney and Andrew Miles at Enron are championing John as a
late addition to the program.

While I know Enron doesn't routinely recruit at GSIA, John would be an ideal
candidate if you are willing to make an exception.  He is a terrific finance
student with a strong transcript; including an A+ in my Options class. Since
John has an engineering/energy background, he asked early on for additional
background reading about finance and energy.  John is personable and
outgoing.  Normally the job market for someone of John's caliber would have
already cleared, but I have been told that there are dual career issues at
play here.

I would be very appreciative if you would take a look at John.  A copy of
his resume is attached to this email.

Best regards,
Duane

********
Duane Seppi

Graduate School of Industrial Administration
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA  15213-3890

tel. (412) 268-2298
fax (412) 268-8896

email ds64@andrew.cmu.edu

 - John Gordon's Resume


Great idea to put this out there.  FYI, I have arranged for Jack Wisdom to provide some training on wage and hour law issues in the next few weeks.  I'll keep you posted on the status of that.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Acevedo, Felecia
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:14 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Palmer, Lizzette; Sullivan, Kriste
Subject:	FW: HR Reminder - Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Butcher, Sharon
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 7:39 PM
To:	Acevedo, Felecia
Subject:	RE: HR Reminder - Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Dear Felecia:

This is a great HR Reminder.  I recommend that you send it to Michelle Cash, Lizzette Palmer, and Kriste Sullivan.

Thanks.

Sharon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Acevedo, Felecia
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Walton, Sheila; Hill, Jo Ann; Pierce, Shelly; Migliore, Todd; McSherry, Brad; Bosien, Teresa; Taylor, Diane; Fincher, Wendy; Alvarez, Irma
Cc:	Butler, Sam; Carrera, Susan; Ward, Cindy R.; Aguilar, Christa; Butcher, Sharon; Galloway, Sonja; Cox, Shirley
Subject:	HR Reminder - Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

To Corporate HR Generalists,  Compensation and Payroll

Periodically, I plan to communicate refreshers on the FLSA and its requirements for both exempt and non-exempt employees.  For this communication, I would like to focus on compensatory time off.  While Enron does not have a formal written policy on compensatory time off, we must not forget the regulatory obligations for administering this provision of the FLSA.   I encourage each of you to share this information with your client groups.

I recently overheard a conversation in the elevator where an employee was talking about all the comp time they had accrued and how they planned to take it before yearend.  Several immediate and simultaneous thoughts went through my head -- 1) is this an exempt or nonexempt employee, 2) where is this being recorded, and 3) what if this employee gets redeployed/termed or transfers jobs--would they expect to take this time off or in the case of a nonexempt employee be paid for it?  Unfortunately, we have no way to validate comp time since we have no tracking mechanism for this.  In the case of a nonexempt employee this could become a very risky situation.

Compensatory Time Off for Non-Exempt Employees

Compensatory time off for non-exempt employees must be used in the same pay period in which it is accrued.  If an employee works overtime in a workweek which falls at the beginning of a pay period, then the employee can take time off with pay in a workweek later in the same pay period.  If an employee cannot use all of the accrued comp time by the end of the pay period, then the employee must be paid for the comp time in the paycheck for the pay period.  Any comp time which is used by nonexempt employees must be provided at the rate of one and one-half hours off with pay for every overtime hour which is worked.  There is no cost savings in the use of comp time.

Compensatory Time Off for Exempt Employees

If an employer promises comp time to an overtime exempt employee, then the employee may be able to enforce the promise of additional compensation even though the employee was not entitled to overtime pay.  Enron's Overtime Pay and Reimbursement Policy states "Exempt employees are not eligible for overtime pay."   Responding to an exempt employee's claim that he or she is entitled to comp time is often difficult because records are not generally kept of exempt employee's hours of work--(I plan to devote my next communication to tracking an exempt employee's hours worked as this is often an area of confusion).  The provisions of comp time may also adversely affect the "salary" which must be paid for white-collar employees to be overtime exempt.

I hope this communication will be helpful and I welcome any feedback or suggested topics you may want additional information about.  Please feel free to pass this on to anyone I overlooked in your respective groups.

Felecia Acevedo
Director, Corporate Compensation
(713) 853-9815 Phone
(713) 646-2113 Fax
(713) 557-5921 Cell
felecia.acevedo@enron.com


FYI.
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group already running mock "black out" drills.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001 09:44 AM -----

	"Laura Goldseth" <lgoldseth@svmg.org>
	04/26/2001 07:37 PM

		 To: <lgoldseth@svmg.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Friday, April 27 Pilot Drill

This e-mail serves as a reminder for the Pilot Blackout Drill scheduled for
tomorrow, April 27 from 1:00 to 5:00pm.  Click on the link below for a
participant list, contact information, details and to SIGN UP TO
PARTICIPATE.  The Blackout Busters Subcommittee continues to work hard to
protect business' from blackouts.  This drill will help them to keep the
lights on.  SIGN UP NOW!

http://www.blackoutbusters.com/


Start Date: 4/5/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040511.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  13.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  27.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


whatever, did you drive today

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

fine goodbye mr. boring sir

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

im sorry its actually really busy right now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

are you going to be boring today?


Dear Jim,

Sometime within the past week you may have received a catalogue that  describes Xenergy's Multi-Client Research offerings for 2001. In case it  did not reach you, I have attached a pdf version for your convenience. The  catalogue gives an overview of the various core and companion studies that  Xenergy is currently working on. The REM 2001 program is described on page  2. I have attached a REM 2001 powerpoint presentation to better  explain our work.  The slides go into more depth about the current status  of retail energy markets (slides 1-22), and then where things stand with  the research that is underway.  Do let me know if you'd like more  information about the REM 2001 study and I will be happy to arrange a conference  call with Taff Tschamler, one of the key people involved with this  project.  The final meeting for sponsors will be held Feb 25 -27, 2002 at  the Four Seasons Hotel in Austin Texas.  Aside from hearing about the final  study results, this meeting is an excellent opportunity to meet informally  with all of our Retail Energy Market sponsors.

I will check back with you in a week or so to see if you have  questions.
Thanks very much for your time.

Laura Colburn, Xenergy, Inc.
(781) 273-5700, ext. 505ldcolburn@mediaone.net

 - Laura Colburn.vcf
 - Multi Client Catalog.pdf
 - REM 2001Status of Retail Mkts. .ppt


Elizabeth Kohanek
1217 Paseo Dorado
Fullerton, CA 22833
elizabeth@media-enterprises.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Kohanek


Althea

Great news. It's all your hard work.

Vince

Althea Gordon@ENRON
04/20/2001 01:43 PM
To:	vince.kaminski@enron.com, brad.romine@enron.com, brad.alford@enron.com, martin.lin@enron.com, Stephen.swain@enron.com, matt_harris@enron.net, elliot.mainzer@enron.com, mauricio.mora@enron.com, victor.browner@enron.com
cc:	greg.whalley@enron.com, traci.warner@enron.com, patricia.payton@enron.com
Subject:	Another Stanford Acceptance

Stanford Team,

We have received yet another acceptance - Noah Jacobs has accepted our offer as a summer associate.  We are now 4 of 6 for our summer offers.  I have sent Paul Kasper, our one full time offer a cultivation gift and will be checking in on him next week.  Also Eric Cope, a Stanford student that Vince Kaminski's group had interviewed here in Houston for a summer associate position has also accepted.  All in all our Stanford numbers are looking great!

Many thanks to everyone and keep up the great work!
Althea


Thanks for your email.  Please call me when you have a chance.

Jeff
713 853 1761

"Chris Handte" <handtec@wharton.upenn.edu> on 09/26/2000 10:06:14 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Opportunities in Japan

Hi Mr. Shankman,

I am a second year finance major at Wharton.  I left a voice mail for you
the other day in which I mentioned my interest in pursuing finance
opportunities in Japan.  I have extensive experience in Japan and am looking
to go back and take advantage of some of the fascinating changes that are
occurring over there.  I will try calling you again this Thursday to
hopefully discuss Enron's strategies and opportunities more specifically.  I
have attached my resume for your consideration.  I look forward to talking
to you.

Sincerely yours,

Christopher Handte
________________________________

Christopher Handte
Wharton MBA Candidate, Class of 2001
4300 Spruce Street, Apt. C-104
Philadelphia, PA 19104
215-382-8744
E-Mail: Christopher.Handte.wg01@wharton.upenn.edu

 - RESUME - Christopher Handte.DOC


Frank & Hector,

Here is the list of contractors that Kymberly sent Sally - please compare to
list from Peggy McCurley that Sally gave you last week.

Thanks,
Patti x39106


The attached draft is revised to specify that TW is soliciting requests for a
term of 5 years.  Please forward your comments to me by the end of Monday,
December 4th.

Thanks again!
Lindy


Edmund:  I gather from Paul Radous that these are both ECTRIC ISDA masters
and transactions.  I have a November 11,1999 South African derivatives
questionnaire (from Webber Wentzel Bowens).  Would you like to have a copy?
Sara

	Carol St Clair
	06/06/2000 09:00 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Anglo American plc

Sara:
What do you think?
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Deepak Sitlani
	06/06/2000 08:22 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Anglo American plc

Carol

Further to my voice-mail message, please see below.  Can you please let me
know whether you are happy for us (in London) to carry out the ISDA
negotiations with respect to Anglo American Corporation?

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.

Many thanks
Deepak
---------------------- Forwarded by Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT on 06/06/2000
14:15 ---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
06/06/2000 14:09
To: Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Holmes/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Anglo American plc

Add the first one to the ISDA status list.

For the S. Africa entity ENA legal needs to be informed of this as they
usually deal with S. Africa. Suggest you contact Carol St. Clair as to
whether she is happy for us to run with this if we are just going to be doing
deals from Europe.

Thanks, Edmund

Deepak Sitlani
06/06/2000 02:04 PM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Anglo American plc

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT on 06/06/2000
14:06 ---------------------------

Martin Holmes
06/06/2000 14:00
To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Anglo American plc

Paul

We would like to begin to establish ISDA agreements with the following
entities:

Anglo American plc (www.angloamerican.co.uk) based in London and

Anglo American Corporation of South Africa Limited.

The annual financial statement  of Anglo American plc can be taken from the
website above. I have asked the folks at Anglo American in Johannesburg,
South Africa for the financials for the Anglo American Corporation.

Can you take a look at this for me please?

Thanks

Martin


bev needs to say to dunn, "i don't know anything.  you need to call
richard."  jeff


I tried calling you last night but your phone just kept ringing.

AND, John Kinder called me this morning and told me I didn't get my
capacity.  He said the winter goes for max rate and I bid $.16, but the
goober would not give me a good feel for what it went for.


Here's material for this upcoming  week.
?
Bobby
 - NEON Roaring 3.doc


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 04:24 PM -----

	Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/24/2001 04:14 PM

		 To: jbennett@gmssr.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Stipulation

Jeanne, please send a signed copy to me by fax (713-646-8266) and an email of
the final version to Jeff.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Subject:

Greetings:
Could you email me the final version of the stipulation.  Thanks a lot.

Best,
Jeff


Drew,

Here is Agave for June.  I also made a change to May.  I was calculating the
differential off of the wrong location index.

DG


Hey buddy.  I would love to take a tour.  I'm tied up with a family illness
for the next couple of weeks so don't wait on me.

Great Idea though.

Richard Pinion
08/10/2000 09:03 AM
To: kmacivo@enron.com, Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Flying

Yesterday I was getting ready to fly out of Fletcher's at Hobby airport when
a man asked if I was with Enron (he saw my United Way shirt most of us were
wearing yesterday).  He said that he too was an Enron employee but had missed
the United Way kick-off event.  He told me he was one of our corporate pilots
and we spoke for several minutes since I had someone waiting at Houston
Southwest airport to pick me up.

I asked if I might arrange with him to get a tour of our corporate hanger and
airplanes and he said he would be glad to arrange such an event.  I told him
that several of us pilots at Enron might be interested.  He gave me his card
and said that he had a trip for Tuesday but to just call him when we were
ready and he would arrange to make it happen.  Soooo... If you are interested
or know others who might be, let me know some times and dates and we will
make this happen.

RP


Didn';t one of you guys review this for all of us last time?  Let me know--my
memory isn't helping me today.  Marhta, please print the stuff for me.
thanks all  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001
03:19 PM ---------------------------

William E Brown
01/24/2001 02:31 PM
Sent by: William E Brown
To: Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron, Colleen
Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, David L
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Allen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, William
Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Compliance Report and Distribution Memo for the Year Ended
December 31, 2000

Attached for your review and comment is the 1st draft of the above subject
report and the distribution memo for the same.

Please print the report and memo, and mark your changes.  In the event you
are responding for a group, please indicate for whom you are responding.
Regardless of whether or not you have any comments you are asked to return a
hard copy of this report and memo to me  (indicate on the return copy that
you have no comments) in Houston, EB4783, by noon, Friday, February 2, 2001.
A  final draft of the report will be circulated on February 7, 2001, with
your comments due to me by noon, Friday, February 16, 2001.

Please note that the report is required to be filed with the Enron Corp.,
Compliance Director and the BOD of Enron Operations Services Corp., by March
31, 2001.  Your assistance in timely filing the report is greatly
appreciated.  You may contact me at (713) 345-7023, with any questions you
may have on this matter.

Bill Brown


To EPLF and its sympathizers:   Unless the toaster is returned immediately, SADIST will commence an escalating series of  actions designed to bring all such terrorists to their knees.  We realize there may be some collateral damage, and for this we are truly sorry.  But we must end toaster terror forever.  Beginning at 0900 hours on 10 January 2002, SADIST will commence the following series of actions (each subsequent action will commence 2 hours after the preceeding sanction):
1. All deliveries of new business cards will be suspended
2. Napkins and paper towels will be removed from the kitchens
3. Post-it notes will be confiscated from all locations
4. Paper towels will be removed from all bathrooms
5. Toilet paper will be removed from all bathrooms ( Enron stock certificates will be issued for humanitarian reasons)

If the toaster still has not been returned, SADIST will be forced to remove all COFFEE FILTERS from the building, including the Energizer and Plaza Java.  Do not doubt our will to use this ultimate weapon, after all we are SADIST.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brady, Andy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:25 PM
To:	Kuehl, Toby
Cc:	Green, Alma; Matheson, Maggie; Carter, Zuela; Clapper, Karen; Bastida, Nancy; Eldridge, Dale; Laferla, Lynda ; Collins, Marion; Howard, Jack; Hanagriff, Richard; Draemer, Mary ; Trevino, Linda; Studebaker, James ; Rivers, Cynthia; Mulligan, Amy; Kowalke, Terry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kovalcik, Tammy; Lokey, Teb; Buehler, Craig; Betancourt, Ramona ; Salinas, Marian; Brown, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: Paper Situation

It has come to the attention of the Dedicated Information Technology Programmers Addicted to Caffeine that we are somehow getting the short end of the stick in these negotiations.  We are generally used to this, but this is the last straw!  Being an often overlooked faction in these wars, we are however, very powerful.  Unless you provide us with the affricated drinks we require to survive, we will sabotage these negotiations.  We start by asking the following questions:  What are your requirements for paper?  Have you documented these requirements.  What is the cost justification for ordering this paper?  What printers are you using?  Does IT have to support these printers?  That will cost extra money.  What were the different requirements surrounding your use of the toaster?  Do you toast bread and waffles?  What other uses do you have for the toaster?  Anything not specifically included in your written requirements will be rejected as a scope enhancement and will cost more money or cause a delay in the return of your toaster.

To avoid further delays in the negotiations, please deliver bribes in 6-packs of 24-ounce bottles of the following:  Dr. Pepper, Mountain Dew, RC Cola, Jolt.  These payments should be left in the kitchen refrigerator so that they will be cold when we drink them in the morning.

Remember, paper without a working printer is the wrong print queue.  A toaster without power is a metal storage box.  We have the power and will use it.

DITPAC Command

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kuehl, Toby
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:43 PM
To:	Green, Alma; Matheson, Maggie; Carter, Zuela; Clapper, Karen; Bastida, Nancy; Eldridge, Dale; Laferla, Lynda ; Collins, Marion; Howard, Jack; Hanagriff, Richard; Draemer, Mary ; Trevino, Linda; Studebaker, James ; Rivers, Cynthia; Mulligan, Amy; Kowalke, Terry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Salinas, Marian; Kovalcik, Tammy; Lokey, Teb; Buehler, Craig; Betancourt, Ramona
Subject:	RE: Paper Situation

We are willing to sit at the table and negotiate.  SADIST has pushed us to the brink!  We have infiltrated the SADIST camp and know are in possession of a toaster, AND blender.  We have joined sides with EPLF to demand that our paper supply stays in high demand.  If our demands are not met by the end of today, we will be forced to sign over all our Enron stock options to your organization.  This will cause your organization to implode!!

CCA (Crumb Crunchers of America)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:21 AM
To:	Buehler, Craig
Cc:	Green, Alma; Studebaker, James ; Carpenter, Nancy; Giambrone, Laura; Veatch, Stephen; Kilmer III, Robert; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Thompson, Debra; Doll, Jeanette; Paschal, Zelda; Culwell, Christi; Allen, Kelly; Dietz, Rick
Subject:	Toaster

We will never negotiate with toaster terrorists!  We will eat raw bread forever rather than turn over a single sheet of paper - or even a single chad - to those who would resort to such extortion.  If we give in now, we will only encourage such acts in the future.  First our microwaves, then our filtered water dispenser, then our refrigerators will become targets of these evil doers.  Rather, we will hunt down those responsible for this dastardly act, and bring them to justice or justice to them.  We will also go after any department supporting the evil doers as well as anyone who partakes of bread (or Eggos or pop tarts) toasted in the purloined appliance!

EPLF -- you're TOAST!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: EPLF
Subject: FW: Paper Situation

We have your toaster!!!  You'll get it back when our demands are met.
Leave 4 boxes of 8 1/2 x 11 paper (no damn 3 hole punch paper either)
under the TV on the west end of the 39th floor and you'll be toasting
away within a few hours.  This isn't from Craig; we've hacked into his
email...

Enron People's Liberation Front (EPLF)...

-----Original Message-----
From: Green, Alma

Getting paper for the floor is out of my hands.  I have had three calls this morning plus a note left on my desk to order paper.
Donna Scott is working with the mail room.

Our toaster that Rick Dietz bought when we moved down here is missing this A.M.  Has been reported to Facilities who will report to Security.  If anyone knows anything, would you please let me know!

	Tnx, Alma G.


Kam asked that I email you guys about the FT-ONTARIO book move.  Please move
the book for Price, Basis and Index from FT-ONT-CENTRAL to FT-ONTARIO.  This
also encompasses splitting out the price and basis and fixing the curves in
the curve table.  This needs to be done by Monday night, 7/31.  Thanks for
you help and please shout with any questions.
PL