Kay-are you certain that Enron didn't sign it, because I recall that it was
signed (and the conversations we had about getting it signed)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: RE: NW escrow agreement

Marissa,

I suppose that's because ENA didn't sign it, as I didn't notice it (opps).
It will probably be tomorrow since Ben will need to initial, as well as me.
Can you email me the sig page?

Thanks,

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 05/14/2001 10:26:16 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  RE: NW escrow agreement

Kay:

This past Friday, I received six original signature pages to the Letter
Agreement, but did not receive original signature pages to the Guaranty.
Could you forward the signature pages to the Guaranty at your earliest
convenience?

Thanks,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:54 AM
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com; mreuter@kslaw.com
Subject: NW escrow agreement

Hi there,

I believe Chris should be back today, so I wanted to follow up on this.

I don't have any recollection of where we left the escrow agreement with
NW.  Please get with MKahn or Jerry DeBerry to see if we can get consensus
on the current form of escrow agreement.  Once we have that, Enron (Chris)
will make contact with Citibank.

Thanks,

Kay
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000008544&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000008544
Request Create Date : 11/29/00 9:30:01 AM
Requested For       : wes.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Tana:  Here's the background info.  Do you want to prepare the ISDA CSA?  We
will also need an amendment to replace the old with the new.  I now need to
reread Tanya's message.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 03:04 PM -----

	Soma Ghosh
	12/06/2000 05:37 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Bank of America Credit Support Annexe

Sara,

With respect to the amendment to the B of A ISDA Credit Support Annexe, the
contact at B of A is James Allred (MD Energy Finance Group & Credit
Products). He will pass the docs onto the relevant lawyer.

Tel: 713 651 4830
Fax: 713 651 4841
james.r.allred@bankofamerica.com

As you suggested, I have spoken with Tanya re. the Credit Support Annexe, &
she will be sending you a worksheet.

I have left messages with Teresa re. Mahonia docs. I would be grateful if you
would speak with her so that we have consistency in the Chase & Mahonia
contracts.

Please give me a call if you need anything else.

Many thanks,

Soma


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Labbe, Anne
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina
Subject:	RE: 401K

Ina,

1-800-332-7979, option 3 (I think) or they can access it on the web from the following address:

http://hrweb.enron.com/benefits/savingPlans/Default.asp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:48 PM
To:	Labbe, Anne
Subject:	401K

Please send me the phone number to change 401K deductions.

Thanks!
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


I think we are making great progress on the systems side.  I would like to
set a deadline of November 10th to have a plan on all North American projects
(I'm ok if fundementals groups are excluded) that is signed off on by
commercial, Sally's world, and Beth's world.  When I say signed off I mean
that I want signitures on a piece of paper that everyone is onside with the
plan for each project.  If you don't agree don't sign. If certain projects
(ie. the gas plan) are not done yet then lay out a timeframe that the plan
will be complete.  I want much more in the way of specifics about objectives
and timeframe.

Thanks for everyone's hard work on this.

John


Per Robert's request.

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058

	Robert Rose@ENRON
	05/30/2001 03:48 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: MUD 23 Access & Maintenance Agreement

Dan,

Ann Elizabeth prepared an agreement last week whereby
Harris County MUD No. 23 would be allowed certain
access across HPL Bammel property to do work on
their drainage ditches.  After a review of the agreement
by Steve Schneider, he suggested that language be
added concerning a matting of the property over
the pipelines when "heavy machinery" is used.  Also,
he suggested that language as to property/road
restoration be added.

Taffy, can you email a copy of the agreement to Dan
so he can make these changes (I was only provided
hard copies)?

Please let me know if you have any questions!

Thank you very much,

r


Jassem,

Attached is the latest update for the DPC project. A printed copy of the
attached document with photos is being forwarded to you seperately. I will be
responsible for sending you the monthly updates in the future. Also, I am
planning a trip to the Middle East at the end of March and the beginning of
April. I hope to meet with you at that time. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me at 713 345-5855.

Best Regards,

Paul


Hi,
	Previously I forwarded an email to you which contain a list of options products we are considering making markets in.
	Many of you have asked for more details on these (exotic) options products.
	In response to this request, I will be periodically forwarding modules to your attention which give further details on these options products.
	Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, comments, etc.

Regards,
Iris Mack, MBA/PhD
Power Options Trading Desk
x3-6711


Per your request.
---------------------- Forwarded by George Quittner/ET&S/Enron on 11/20/2000
09:03 AM ---------------------------

George Quittner
11/16/2000 01:02 PM
To: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: 2000 Goals & Objectives

Goals and objectives and personal accomplishments attached.

	From:  John R Keller                           11/14/2000 02:05 PM

Sent by: Candace Williams
To: Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tom Parker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Sinclair/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Osburn/OTS/Enron@ENRON, George Quittner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morris
Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron

Subject: 2000 Goals & Objectives

As a reminder, your 2000 Goals and Objectives stating your personal
accomplishments must be sent to John no later than Monday 11/27/00. Should
you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Many Thanks!
Candace Williams
Ext. 68312


---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 02:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/20/2000 02:08 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William C Falbaum/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mitchell Gas Services 2/00

We have a price difference with Mitchell Gas Services for 2/00 production,
deal 156658.  We have HSC -0.05 and Mitchell shows HSC - 0.04.  Can you tell
me what the correct price is?  I need this ASAP.

Megan


Chip --

The e-mail I referenced in my voice mail.  Please call if you have any information.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:03 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Ward, Charles; Portz, David
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Merger Analysis - ERCOT Market Share
Importance:	High

I am trying to identify generation assets owned and/or controlled in ERCOT by Enron and its affiliates.

The information I have been provided is that Enron only has Ponderosa Pine Energy Partners LTD - 263 MW.  Is this correct?

Do we have any long-term capacity over the DC Tie?
Do we have any construction in progress?
Any other positions (e.g., Capacity Auction) that may be considered by the PUCT in the merger?

Is there anyone else I should talk with about this information?

Thanks,

Jim


I got a call from Tino earlier today (right after our meeting on Pueblo) but
could only talk to him for a few minutes before I had to jump off.  I did let
him know that Kevin or Lorraine would be calling to talk about info that we
need to complete our analysis of the economics.  He also let me know that
they are looking at another power plant project in the SW Power Pool and want
to discuss with us.  Thanks.


New matter

	"Barrett H. Reasoner" <Breasoner@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
	07/27/2000 11:40 AM

		 To: "'Sanders, Richard'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wright

As to the little work I'll do in the near term reading the pleadings and
talking to Charlie re the Wright case, do you want me to set up a new matter
number or just bill it to the Grynberg file? Please let me know.  As always,
we really appreciate the opportunity to represent you. - Barrett


Hello all:

FYI:

Jones Graduate School Research Seminar Series in Finance
Sponsored by Enron Corp.

Alon Brav
Fuqua School of Business
Duke University

will give a seminar at the Jones School on Friday, March 31,

"Competing Theories of Financial Anomalies"

*The seminar will begin at 3:15PM  in Room 115.

*Note the slightly early start time to accommodate an early flight.

A pdf of the paper is available through the seminar website
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~ostdiek/seminars/


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/19/2001 03:23
PM ---------------------------

Taffy Milligan@ECT
03/12/2001 01:19 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole@ENRON, Carol
St Clair@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Perez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Connie
Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn III@ECT,
Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPME, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald
Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janet.H.Moore@enron.com, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 2/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_, Development Testuser/HOU/ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paula Craft/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Ferguson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
MacDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, /HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Alphabetic Phone List - EWS Legal


Kay -FYI, this note was prepared by Peoples on what they believe to be the
open commercial issues.  I will probably sit down with them on Friday to get
their true viewpoint on the various items.  They tend to be much more open
with me outside the large group.  If only I could work this into a happy hour
we would be set.

Also, Please don't acknowledge in front of Peoples that you have received
this, although I believe this was prepared with input from their counsel.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 06/21/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

Roy Rodriguez
06/20/2000 04:28 PM
To: Tim.Hermann@enron.com, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Burgener/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron @ ECT
Subject: Commercial Issues on Hub Agency Contract

Tim and Greg and Paul, are you available to sit down with Dave wear on Thurs
(6/22) at 8:30 to discuss the following commercial issues on the Hub Agency
document.. Our goal is to come to agreement on these items and forward
answers to the issues for documentation.  Please come prepared with any
documentation that may help support any of the following items.

Here is a list of outstanding business issue that PEC representatives are
aware of - Note, there
> may be other business issues that have been discussed at a business level
> that PEC representatives are not aware of.  Note, this list does not
include legal/regulatory issues and is not.
>
> 1. Credit risk - Who will be responsible for performing credit checks
> of Hub Shippers?  Who will bear the risk of bad debt?  Will the party
> bearing such risk bear all or a portion of the risk?  Will there be a
> bright line rule that all unapproved Hub Shippers (unapproved for credit
> reasons) or Hub Shippers exceeding their credit level must first be
> approved by Peoples?
>
> 2. Extended Hub Transactions - Extended Hub Transactions will be
> included in cumulative gross revenues but deals proposed but not executed
> during term of Agency Agreement will not be included in cumulative gross
> revenues.  Is this correct?
>
> 3. Refunds - Will MEH be at risk for FERC-ordered refunds or will MEH
> only be allowed to charge the rate in effect prior to a rate filing during
> any period when rates are subject to refund?
>
> 4. Fees - What is the monthly administrative service fee and what does
> this fee include?  How will fee be paid - will MEH offset or send Peoples
> an invoice?
>
> 5. Performance Standard - What will the performance standard be?  What
> is Peoples' remedy if MEH does not achieve the performance standard e.g.
> will Peoples be entitled to terminate the Agency Agreement or obtain a
> reduction in the administrative service fee?
>
> 6. Transition - What will the length of the transition period be after
> the Agency Agreement terminates or otherwise expires?
>
> 7. Please discuss how this Agency Agreement will work operationally
> from the point when Peoples announces available capacity through the point
> in time when a Hub Shippers calls MEH for services through to the point in
> time when Peoples nominates and schedules.  Include anticipated timing of
> the events e.g. how quickly will Peoples respond to a request from MEH.
>


Greeley's # for September
Base:  2700
Swing:  875


Susan and I are on the case.  Are you still in DC?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: Dynegy v. ComEd update

yes, excellent.  thanks - i will review.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Lindberg, Susan; Herndon, Rogers; Misra, Narsimha; Sharfman, Guy; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan; Steffes, James D.; Migden, Janine; Forster, David; Baughman Jr., Don; Stroup, Kerry; Roan, Michael; Kingerski, Harry; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Presto, Kevin M.; Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject:	Dynegy v. ComEd update

Susan and I will circulate a draft response against Dynegy's position later today.  ComEd plans to file a lengthy answer disputing Dynegy stating that there are no transmission problems due to the use of the firm LD resources and that FERC precedent does not support a capacity payment requirement.

Enron will respond similarly and include an argument that Dynegy is actually trying to create an "icap/capacity" requirement where there is none (Dynegy's pleading states "ComEd's failure to enforce the network designation provisions of its OATT also deprives Dynegy of capacity payments to which it is entitled.)  We will also include statements that the continuation of the network v. PTP transmission tariffs perpetuates these types of issues and the market/tariff design that we advocate should be approved to stop these problems.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Herndon, Rogers; Misra, Narsimha; Sharfman, Guy; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan; Steffes, James D.; Migden, Janine; Forster, David; Baughman Jr., Don; Stroup, Kerry; Roan, Michael; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	Dynegy vs. ComEd (EL02-6) -- further info

As I mentioned in my previous e-mail, on October 17 Dynegy filed a complaint against ComEd.  This proceeding may be of particular interest to Enron given EES's plans to offer physical delivery in Illinois in early 2002.  I've outlined Dynegy's principal arguments below.  Dynegy requested fast-track processing, so any intervention and comments we file are due Friday, Oct. 26.  In order to file a timely intervention (and meaningful comments, if we decide to comment), I need to know your thoughts on this as soon as possible.  Elizabeth and Harlan, I'm copying you because I would especially like to know what you think of Dynegy's characterization of the Firm LD product.

Main argument:
Dynegy challenges ComEd's published Business Practice that allows "marketer firm" (Firm LD) contracts to be designated as Network Resources.  Dynegy argues that this practice conflicts with the OATT provisions that 1) Network Resources are generation "owned, purchased or leased by the Network Customer designated to serve Network Load," and 2) a Network Customer "must demonstrate that it owns or has committed to purchase generation pursuant to an executed contract" in order to designate a Network Resource.

Dynegy's theory on why Firm LD should not be a Network Resource:

	- permits designation of network resources that are committed for sale to others, creating reliability problems
	- Firm LD under the EEI contract is not capacity-backed, nor is it a commitment to purchase generation
	- allows transmission customers to get the advantage of generation capacity without actually paying the cost of that capacity
	- since retail providers are allowed to rely on "over-the-counter" firm instead of securing long-term contracts, adequate reserves are not being carried to serve retail load

Dynegy claims that ComEd's practice has deprived DMG of payments for capacity and the ability to earn revenues for capacity properly designated as network resources.  It cites specific instances in which ComEd has accepted transmission reservation requests from New Energy and Cilco in which these parties designated Illinois Power as a network resource, when only a Firm LD contracts were in place with IP.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


?
-----Original Message-----From: Mark RINC?N Ram?rez
[mailto:lpaz256@uts.cc.utexas.edu]Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000  10:54
PMTo: lediplomat@yahoo.frCc: maryjessie@lycos.com;  riverpierce@hotmail.com;
Rincon, JaimeSubject: how is this for  subliminable?
If you look under  your bed, you will find a little grouchy monster who will
give you this  anonymous tip:Amazingly, rearranging the letters of
"Republican National  Committee" produces the words "Inept ballot count:
America  mine".
 - pic26962[1].jpg


What is the deal?

From: David Rosenberg on 12/12/2000 11:04 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Possible Mark-to-Market Situation We Discussed - A Question

Hayes suggested I run by you what the possible MTM situation looks like,
particularly since I'm
not sure I know what I am doing as regards the discount factors allowed and
how to or whether to
account for the factor that the cash moneys don't start flowing in until 2nd
quarter of 2002.

Here is my take:


Revisions for 12/01

Bev
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 10:38
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Victor Haley" <Victor.Haley@dvn.com>
11/27/2000 11:35 AM

To: <beverly.beaty@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: REVISED AVAILS FOR 12/00 AS NOTED

REVISED AVAILS FOR 12/00 AS NOTED

 - EnronAvails1200pools.xls


For November 16th thru the 30th, CRC has purchased 25 MWs, heavy load at
SP-15 from Williams.  If you have any questions, please call me at
702-682-6977.  Thanks again for all your help


Will do, and get back to you asap!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Quick Inspirations 	 [IMAGE]  Home   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  Lose 10 Pounds by Nov. 19th !! [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   Your inspirational quote for the day:  [IMAGE]    I Asked God          [IMAGE]  I asked God for Strength... And He gave me difficulties to make me strong.  [IMAGE]  I asked God for Wisdom... And He gave me problems to solve.  [IMAGE]  I asked God for Prosperity... And He gave me brain and brawn to work.  [IMAGE]  I asked God for Courage... And He gave me danger to overcome.  [IMAGE]  I asked God for Love... And He gave me troubled people to help.  [IMAGE]  I asked God for Favors... And He gave me opportunities.  [IMAGE]  I received nothing I wanted... And I received everything I needed.  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] Check out our other inspirational content: [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  24 Remember [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Special [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Care [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Visit QuickInspirations.com  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    To unsubscribe from the Quick Inspirations newsletter simply click here    You received this email because you opted to receive the Quick Inspirations Newsletter through one of our valued partners.  If you believe you received this message in error or would no longer like to receive quick inspirations please follow the unsubscription instructions at the bottom of this email.  If you have any questions please email qi-help@quickinspirations.com  and a customer service representative will assist you    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	Quick Inspirations is Copyright ? 2001. All rights reserved.  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]


Michael Tribolet:

In response to your question, yes, Edison did file in federal district court
in L.A.  The filing asks the judge to force the CPUC to 1) declare that the
rate free is over and 2) raise rates to compensate Edison for its
undercollections.  (Recall that this filing comes on the heels of the court
agreeing to hear Edison's case asserting that the CPUC must let Edison pass
through the power purchase costs to customers.)

The filing is apparently very large.  The lawyers at the CPUC have a copy but
said that it's much too large to make a copy and aren't willing to give it to
us to make a copy for ourselves.

Question to the lawyers:  Do we have contacts in L.A. that can go to the
courthouse and get a copy of the filing for us?  Probably a good idea to have
that filing passed around to this distribution list.

Best,
Jeff


Please review again and forward back to me with correct names, addresses and
phone numbers.

Thanks in advance,

adr


<http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM00>

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

   Schools <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM14H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Military <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM135H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Groups <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM87H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Features <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM12H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Member Benefits <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM72H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Help <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM06H>   	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	   Search <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM139H>
  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

Missed Someone on Your List?

It's not too late to send holiday greetings in a Hi Note to your old friends. Become a Gold member to send your merry best today. <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM09H>

Reap the Rewards

A Gold membership more than pays for itself with our exclusive Member Rewards. Get Delta vacation discounts, Buyer Assurance, and bargains galore. Find out more! <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM72H>

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	Ryan, in the midst of the holiday frenzy, take a moment to see who's new on your class list:

South High School <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM08/4796>
24 new classmates have joined.
View these classmates now! <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM08/4796>

Come back to Classmates <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM15H> and make old friends new again.

Best Wishes,

Wendy Dickerman,
Director of Member Care

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

We hope you've enjoyed receiving this message from Classmates. For details on all our email services, visit your email subscriptions page <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM18H>.

Please do not reply to this email. If you need help or have a question, visit our online Help area <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM06H>.

Classmates Connections is a trademark of Classmates Online, Inc.
  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>
	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

 <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/JN70H>
Are These Your Wonder Years?
Do you spend a lot of time these days wondering what happened to your study buddies, roommates, and pals? Become a Gold member today and find out! <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/JN70H>

 <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM148H>
Movies, Music, Sports, and More!
Classmates Interest Groups make it easy to find new friends who share your passions. Visit Classmates and add a little interest to your day. <http://www.classmates.com/go/e/200988231/CC122401BC/CM148H>
	  <http://graphics.classmates.com/graphics/spacer.gif>

  <http://graphics.classmates.com/trklet/rain/open/65DDCB9B02B716318DFFE67F5B4AB869.trk>


Marie,

  Rober Allen just called me and approved my account.  I'll confirm pricing and send in your order by tomorrow.


I know.  You need to speak with me.  Sara

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	09/26/2000 11:34 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Project Condor

Sara -

I don't have any information on this matter.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 09/26/2000 10:55 AM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Project Condor

need to enter new transaction, contacts, etc.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 01:27 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PUC DRAFT Decision

Here's a copy of the draft.

 - CPUC01-#86861-v1-A0011038_et_al__Minkin_Agenda_Dec___.doc


I kind of lost my temper a bit with Mark.   Probably wont sound good on tape,  but I told him that a monkey-man wouldnt interpret the protocols that way.
Its the Dynegy thang talking.

JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Twiggs, Thane
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Forney, John M.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Cc:	Ryall, Jean
Subject:	RE: ASAP please: ERCOT Questions OOMC & OOME

I will put in a call.  Kent is always on the run so it may take awhile to run him down.  I will also do something in writing to get a "record".
TTT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Twiggs, Thane; Nicolay, Christi L.; Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Cc:	Ryall, Jean
Subject:	RE: ASAP please: ERCOT Questions OOMC & OOME

Mark Patterson, our Rep,  called today to ask me if everything was resolved to my satisfaction.    I relayed that I did talk to John Adams last night and he did agree to give us one hour notice with an OOME instruction.    This is great,  however,   Mark warned me that we were outside of the tariff because Ercot still maintains that OOMC means run.
He relayed that in the event of line meltdown,  etc.  we would be liable.     John Adams also said this last night.   We are officially on notice of potential QSE liability.

In my opinion we need to:
Call Ken Saathoff and see if he can resolve their confusion today, otherwise we need to file whatever is necessary, under the protocols,  to protest this ridiculous interpretation and to protect ourself from this "liability."
Officially request clarification in the protocols on this issue.

Thanks,
JForney

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Twiggs, Thane
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles; Maurer, Luiz
Cc:	Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Portz, David; Forney, John M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.
Subject:	RE: ASAP please: ERCOT Questions OOMC & OOME

Here are a few additional points:

I spoke with Ken Saathoff at ERCOT last week (he is the director of technical operations) and he agreed that an OOMC instruction is essentially a "be ready" instruction and an additional OOME or another type of unit specific instruction is necessary for the plant to deploy. He is John Adams boss, so there is a disconnect between the two levels.  In addition to Kent, I spoke to Mark Walker the senior corporate counsel regarding payment, or lack thereof and he suggested that the only method would be to dispute the settlement statement and use that process.  Going forward however, that is not an effective mechanism due to the delay in payment and the necessity to prove your cost structure.

In speaking with Forney a few minutes ago it sounds like he may have convinced John Adams, but I would be happy to call Kent Saathoff if you feel that would help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Portz, David
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Baughman, Edward D.; Miller, Jeffrey; Forney, John M.
Subject:	Ercot Questions OOMC & OOME

Forwarded as discussed.  Doug Gilbert Smith has asked that your group draft a complaint to the PUCT regarding this misinterpretation of the Protocols by the ERCOT ISO, which effectively requires a generator called on for the OOMC ancillary service to run its plant, and sidesteps the obligation to pay an OOME price component when the plant's output is utilized by ERCOT.  The OOMC compensation is currently negligible (and recovery of actual costs under Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.1(6) may take a long time), and the OOME compensation has various problems as well: (1) the more ERCOT calls on a plant for OOME, the the lesser the OOME price paid (Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.2 -- Heat Rate value decreases), and (2) plants directed to provide, say, 135MWs of OOMC/OOME, are not allowed to generate above 135 MWs in an interval (thus running the plant economically at a lower heat rate) to sell the excess in the marketplace. The Frontera plant, a customer of EPMI acting as QSE, is located such that ERCOT is and will be consistently telling the plant via its QSE to provide OOMC -- to produce energy going north on a line in South Texas. Doug says we should advocate to the PUC that plants in such a position should be Reliability Must Run ("RMR") and be paid at an adequate premium for their support of the system' reliability.

I noted to you as well that this is likely to be a dispute with ERCOT over the interpretation of the Protocols, conducted under Protocols Section 20, and we would appreciate any reg. group efforts toward preparation for iinitiating such dispute.  Frontera has indicated they will not provide OOMC tomorrow even if ERCOT tells us, their QSE that it should be dispatched. Thus we are caught in the middle.  The legitimate bases for not complying with an ERCOT dispatch instruction are stated in Protocols Section 5.4.4(2): "threat to safety, risk of bodily harm or damage to the equipment, or otherwise is not in compliance with these Protocols".  Though the Protocols Sections 1-22 seem to recognize as to other capacity- oriented ancillary service products that it is 'generating capacity available but not energy delivered to the grid', I have not seen this made clear as to OOMC.  The Operating Guides' definition of OOMC, page 21 seems to recognize this however, and Section 2B of the ERCOT Market Guide, p. 8 (Feb 22, 2001) recognizes the distinction between capacity and generated energy clearly in support of the position stated by John Forney below.

Sorry for the long e-mail -- I was trying to provide a statting point for your group.
  -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	Ercot Questions

David,
I need some help with an Ercot protocol interpretation:

Frontera has been issued  OOMC requests by the ISO on numerous occasions, starting September 14th.    This Out of Merit request is issued if no mkt bids exist to solve congestion, whether local or zonal.
The OOMC, as I understand it,  reserves capacity for Ercot and the premium is predetermined based on a formula mentioned in the protocols.   The formula is based on the replacement reserve clearing price,  which currently is zero.   This is because the replacement reserve market is non-existent.  An announcement on how the OOMC capacity payments will be calculated is due out this week,  per Mark Patterson.

The second component of this option is OOME.    This is a request for actual energy related to the OOMC option.   The strike price is calculated from a preset heat rate multiplied by the HSC daily price, as mentioned in the protocols.  So the OOMC/OOME ws designed to work like the ancillary services with a capacity award and an energy component.  I think that this is the spirit of the OOM's, as mentioned in Section 6 of the Protocols.

Here is the problem:
the head of Ercot Market Operations,  John Adams,  interprets the protocols to mean that OOMC requries the plant to be generating.     When Ercot dispatchers had issued an OOMC,  they quickly followed up to ask us why we were not generating into the grid.
We explained to them, on numerous occasions,  that we dont believe OOMC means run.   If they wanted us to run,  then they would need to issue an OOME for the actual energy component.    I asked my employees to clarify with Ercot whether we were being asked to run,  yes or no.    When instructed to run by Ercot,  we had to assume that we were settled based upon the OOME calc, as we were previously under OOMC orders.

I sent at least three e-mails to my Ercot rep,  Mark Patterson regarding this issue.   I finally caught him by phone and he relayed that he thought Ercot's  intrepretation was correct.    For all of the times that we ran,  at their request,  we werent going to be paid based on the OOME heat rate calc,  rather we were going to receive the balancing energy price ( a penalty for Resource Imbalance).   For example,  in the early morning hours we would receive as little as $1 for electricity that cost $27 to generate.   Mark also mentioned that when they said run,  they expected us to sell to someone else,  or just generate into the imbalance.    Mark told me "dont worry,  you can file to receive your generation expenses in the event that you lost money."

Here is my view:
OOMC does not mean run.  It means have the capacity available in the event Ercot calls,  much like replacement,  responsive reserve and non-spinning.
Ercot's interpretation is being decided by the Manager of Mkt Operations,  a group supposedly unconcerned with price.
If OOMC means to run,  then why would the protocols contemplate, or need OOME?  They would never have to pay OOME if we were already running into the imbalance.
OOMC is an option and the exercise is OOME.   This is basically the disagreement.    This could very well be a $500,000 issue for Frontera.
Why would anyone generate for $27 and dump to the imbalance mkt at $5 in hopes of filing for a "breakeven."   Ridiculous.

I spoke with Bill Kettlewell with Customer Relations and he had "no comment" on whether OOMC means to generate.  Mark Patterson now also has "no comment."
Bill and Mark said that we needed to file a dispute in order to receive closure on the OOM capacity payment.   I suspect that we will follow this same path when we file for OOME reimbursement vs.  the imbalance price we will receive.

I had instructed my employeess to refuse to turn on the plant   (in response to an OOMC) until we receive an OOME instruction.   This has compelled  Ercot to deploy an OOME request to us, because they need  to have us online to control local congestion.   Would this not be an omission that their view was incorrect?  Section 5.4.4 says that a QSE may fail to comply with an Ercot directive if it causes a safety concern, or ,  Ercot is not in compliance with the Protocols.  The latter is in effect.
Ercot is now telling us that they cannot instruct us, or give us an OOME deployment,  unless we are already runnnig.    I think that this is a software issue, not a protocol issue.
We worked out an interim compromise with Ercot until this issue can be settled.  Once we have been OOMC'd,  we will start to gen.   Once we reach full load,  we will request an OOME.   If they dont comply,  we will shut down the unit.    Ercot said that " it was entirely reasonable that we would  request to be compensated in the form of an OOME."
The Ercot dispatchers are complaining that OOME requires them to send an instruction every 15 minutes.   Is this why we are not getting the OOME instruction on a regular basis?

Finally,  I stressed to Ercot that I wasnt trying to manipulate prices, via OOME or force Ercot into a corner.    It just is not the right economic environment to generate for $27 and sell for $5.    Further,  operations personell at Ercot have frelayed their displeasure with me for "forcing them to OOME our plant."

Can I get an opinion on whether OOMC means to run?   If you agree with me,  what is our next step?  I need to move aggressively on this issue.

Thanks,

JForney
37160


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Tangie/Mobil Allocation for January. to meet in your office

Date:		4/10/2001
Time:		3:30 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


almost forgot about you....
will take care of .  we'll keep you guys together close to the traders.

	  From:  Mike A Roberts                           05/01/2001 09:48 AM

To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	No Cracks

Johnny,

Please don't let my group fall through the cracks!

We'd like to be as close to your desk in the new building as possible (8 seats)

unless you think we should focus on one of the geographical desks

- Mike


I am planning on taking vacation 5/11 and 5/14.  Attached you will find a
copy of the Deal Validation desk procedures that will help you out with the
Deal Validation process.  It would be to your benefit if you took some time
next week to sit with me for a couple of days in the morning before I go on
vacation so that we can go over any questions or concerns you may have.
Please take time to read these desk procedures before next week as it will
help you better understand the Deal Validation process when you sit with me.


I thought I might try to sum up.  It seems to me that we both need to
finalize the structure as well as co-ordinate across various groups such that
we all know what each is doing with the view to funding on time by the end of
next week.

1. As soon as possible next week (i.e. Monday) we need to finalize the swap
structure including the credit and covenant package.

2. If there is not already a Term Sheet in place, it may be useful to have
one prepared.  Frankly, it seems from my various discussions with Global
Finance, Credit, Origination, Enron Corp., Royal Bank of Canada and its
external counsel and our external counsel, that there are certain agreements,
documents, deliverables and covenants that are being expected by, or
exchanged between, the parties, but which are not being communicated among
each other and we are therefore working at cross purposes.  Frankly, unless
and until we know what the structure is to look like, what the credit and
financial covenants are to look like, and what the documentation expectations
are, it is difficult if not  impossible to prepare documentation.  For
example:

 (a) I had a confusing conversation with the Bank as to the form of Guarantee
they were expecting from Enron Corp.  I was trying to require the Bank to
accept an Enron Corp. standard form Guarantee, whereas the Bank was looking
for a long form Guarantee that includes the covenants, representations and
warranties of Enron Corp. in its revolving credit facilities.  Based upon
this disagreement, I left a message for Clement to the effect that we may
have a problem to resolve.  However, Clement was kind enough to advise me by
voice mail that in fact Enron Corp. does not have a problem with giving a
long form Guarantee of this nature and that the form of Guarantee had in fact
been provided (by whom I'm not sure) to the Bank.

 (b) The Bank was enquiring as to what would be the governing law of the
Enron Corp. Guarantee, to which I advised it would be Texas law.  However, I
now understand there may be some agreement (by whom I'm not sure) to have the
Enron Corp. Guarantee governed by New York law.

 (c) In any event, I understand that the Bank will be looking for a form of
enforceability opinion from Enron Corp.'s outside legal counsel with respect
to the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the Enron
Corp. Guarantee, as well as certain conflicts of laws opinions with respect
to the governing law of the Guarantee (Texas/New York) being enforceable.

 (d) In my discussions with the Bank this afternoon, it also became aware to
me that the Bank is expecting external counsel legal opinions with respect to
Enron Canada.  Blake, Cassels & Graydon is prepared to provide those legal
opinions.

 (e) As noted above, I have discussed with the Bank that the governing law of
the underlying swap documents would be Alberta, to which they seemed fine.  I
suggested that Ontario law would also be acceptable.

 (f) I assume that Enron Canada ought to obtain legal opinions from the
Bank's external counsel with respect to the documents and obligations of
Swapco (and perhaps even the Bank), but I will need to have this confirmed.

 (g) It came to my attention during my conversations with the Bank this
afternoon that Swapco (or financing SPV) is unaffiliated to the Bank.  This
presents problems as, I understand for accounting purposes, the two swaps
involving Enron Canada cannot be linked, for example by cross-defaults.  At
the same time unaffiliated exposures under de-linked transactions may not be
capable of being set-off.  We undertook to attempt to remedy this situation
through broadening the set-off concepts under the ISDA Master Agreements.

 (h) I do not think the Bank frankly (nor anyone else) has a firm grasp on
the credit/collateralization/margin requirements, which I think is dependent
upon a final understanding of the swap structure.

 (i) From my discussions with the Bank, it seemed to me that they were not
clear as to how their fees and costs would be repaid through the swap
structure.  Although it might be as simple as adding these amounts to the
principal amount of the swaps, I suggested that the Bank prepare a separate
"fee letter" to recover its fees.  More problematically, the Bank was not
clear as to how "increased costs" would be accounted for in the swap
structure.  Generally speaking, a Bank credit agreement contains provisions
that if there are increased costs of funding to the Bank as a result of a
change in Bank regulations or lending or reserve requirements, those
increased costs are flowed through.  They were not sure how this could be
accommodated in a swap structure.  I suggested that there may be some way to
fix this through a price adjustment mechanism in the fixed price or volumes
or through a separate indemnification in the "fee letter".

 (j) The Bank is anxious to see paper, and I am not sure who is preparing the
paper and consolidating it in a distribution package to the Bank.  For
example, I think a package that includes all of the swap Master Agreements
and related documentation (which I believe Mark T's group will prepare in
Houston), the Enron Corp. Guarantee (which I've indicated above seems to have
already been provided in draft to the Bank) and all other documentation needs
to be sent to the Bank as soon as possible, as well as to Blake, Cassels &
Graydon and Vinson and Elkins if they are to be giving legal opinions to the
Bank in connection with the transaction.  Of course this depends on
finalization of the structure as well as the credit and other covenants
package.  In concept, I have told the Bank, and I believe the Bank agrees,
that the form of the ISDA Master and related documentation would be the same
as the form of ISDA Master which currently exists between ENA and Royal Bank
of Canada, and the Bank asked that they at least be provided with that paper
as soon as possible.  Perhaps Tana could look after delivering that as soon
as possible, if not this afternoon, Monday morning.

Frankly, I think this project, if it is to get funded on time, needs a
measure of co-ordination and communication of internal and external
expectations.  It may be worthwhile to convene a conference call with all
relevant groups (i.e. Legal/Global Finance/Credit/Origination) on Monday
morning.

Regards,
Peter


Scott,

These places carry the Onkyo receiver.  I don't think they carry Polk, but
ask them who you should call for Polk speakers.  The place I got mine from a
couple of years ago no longer carries them.  I'm still looking.  Lee's Audio
& Video have the Onkyo listed at $629.  Their sight is at leesvideo.com

J&R Music World 800-221-8180
Lee's Audio & Video 425-643-5555
Soundcity  800-370-3156

DG


THESE MEETINGS WILL BE HELD TODAY, WEDNESDAY 9/12 IN THE 50M DINING ROOM

	ATTENDEES:

		Ken Lay
		Greg Whalley
		Mark Frevert
		Rick Causey
		Bob Butts
		Mark Lindsey
		and as follows

	2:30 - 2:45	Overview - Causey

	2:45 - 3:00	Andy Fastow

	3:00 - 3:45	Steve Kean

	3:45 - 4:00	Jim Derrick - Rob Walls

	4:00 - 4:15	Billy Lemmons

	4:15 - 4:30	Rick Buy

	4:30 - 4:45	Mark Koenig

	4:45 - 5:15	Rick Causey


Click Here for Last Mailing: http://204.128.208.250/docs/mailings/20011012.txt

GREAT 1997 CABERNET VALUE
RH PHILLIPS Toasted Head CABERNET SAUVIGNON/SYRAH, CALIFORNIA, 1997
12x750ml     $13.99 per bottle (cash)     $154.91 per case (Cash)
A blend of 55% Mendocino County Cabernet Sauvignon with 45% Dunnigan
Hills (Yolo County) Syrah this is a juicy, ripe, well-focused,
flavorful Cabernet-blend that exemplifies the excellent 1997 vintage.
Alive with flavor, it offeres black cherry, blackberry, and black
raspberry fruit along with notes cedar, black pepper, tobacco, and
leather. It has a great medium-weight feel and a supple texture.
It is alive, vibrant, and elegant in the mouth. Not complex but
super delicious. I almost don't want to give it the score it
deserves because I'm afraid no one will believe me; it tastes like
it cost much more and comes from a much fancier appellation.
Excellent. SPEC's Score: 92+ points. (Due to the fact that only
22 cases of this 1997 are available, this item will be sold at
SPEC's 2410 Smith Street Warehouse Store only.)

THE GREAT UNKNOWN: Wine From Off the Well-Worn Path
  Whether you're a wine adventurer or you're just tired of drinking the
same old thing, this is the class for you. On THURSDAY, OCTOBER 18TH at
7:00pm, SPEC's and the Wine School at l'Alliance Francaise will offer a
class and tasting entitled THE GREAT UNKNOWN: Wine from Off the Well-Worn
Path. This class will look at and taste twelve very-good-to-great wines
from lesser-known wine growing areas in France, Spain, and Portugal.  The
class will focus on how the wines are made, the grapes used to make them,
and the land they come from as well as how they match-up with food. Twelve
wines representing a range of styles including both red and white wines
will be tasted. THE GREAT UNKNOWN: Wine from Off the Well-Worn Path will
cost$46.00 "cash" per person ($48.42 regular) with a $10.00 discount
available for 1000 SPEC's Key points. For directions, reservations,
or more information on this class, please call SPEC's at
713-526-8787. This class will be held at l'Alliance Francaise.
L?Alliance Fran?aise, the French cultural organization in Houston,
is located at 427 Lovett Boulevard (on the southeast corner of Lovett
and Whitney, one block south of Westheimer).PLEASE SEE WINE SCHOOL
CANCELLATION POLICY AT BOTTOM.

THUNDER IN TUSCANY: Fontodi and Felsina Chianti Dinner at Simposio
Please join SIMPOSIO Chef Alberto Baffoni and SPEC's Italian wine
buyer Joseph Kemble for the premier dinner at Simposio featuring
the newly released 1999 Chiantis from both Fontodi and Felsina. Be
among the first in Texas to hear the thunder coming from Tuscany.
Chef Baffoni's Menu starts with Tuna carpaccio marinated in a lemon
dressing with calamata olives and red onion dressing served with
Pra Soave Classico Superiore 2000. Then comes Spinach and potato
gnocchi in a gorgonzola cheese sauce served with  Felsina Chinati
Classico 1998 followed by Grilled wild boar sausage with baby
spinach salad in a balsamic tomato vinaigrette served with Fontodi
Chianti Classico 1998. The main course is a Duck leg confit with
sauteed swiss chard and sweet and sour shallot sauce served with
Fontodi Chianti Classico 1999. A Cheese platter with fruit and
walnut will be served with Felsina Chianti Classico 1999. Thunder
in Tuscany is $79.00 per person plus tax and gratituity and will
take place at Simposio Restaurant, 5591 Richmond Avenue at Chimney
Rock, at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, October 16, 2001. For more information
or reservations, please call Simposio at 713-532-0550 or e-mail
simposio@pdq.net

OUISIE?S TABLE MORGAN VINEYARDS OCTOBER WINE PAIRING DINNER
Ouisie?s Table at 3939 San Felipe Road is hosting their last wine
pairing dinner of the year on Wednesday, October 31, 2001 (Halloween).
The evening will begin at 6:45p.m with a cocktail reception.  The
guests will enjoy a multi-course meal along with wines from the
Morgan Winery produced out of the Santa Lucia Highlands appellation
and Monterey County in California. Dan and Donna Lee founded Morgan
Winery in 1982, with a goal of creating the finest wines possible
by obtaining the highest quality fruit. The Lee's named the ranch
the Double L, short for Double Luck, for their identical twin
daughters, Annie and Jackie, who were 5 years old at the time.
The Double L is farmed organically, the only organic vineyard in
the Santa Lucia Highlands. The tariff for the dinner is $85.00 per
person plus tax and gratuity. For reservations please call Ouisie's
713-528-2264 Tuesday through Saturday.  Any questions regarding the
menu or wines may be directed to a Ouisie's manager.

OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS (Details to be Announced)
10/25/01 (Thursday, 7pm) - 1999 Zinfandel: Round II
10/30/01	(Tuesday, 7pm) - Ch. Haut Brion Dinner at Four Seasons Hotel
11/07/01 (Wednesday, 7pm) - Oysters and Fevre Chablis Dinner
11/13/01 (Tuesday, 7pm) - Rhone Valley Wines Class and Tasting
11/14/01 (Wednesday, 7pm) - BV Georges de Latour Cabernet
                            Sauvignon Reserve 1998 Release Party

WINE SCHOOL CANCELLATION POLICY
If for any reason you need to cancel a reservation for a class,
dinner, or other event, please let us know at 713-526-8787 as soon
as possible. Reservations canceled before 4pm on the last business
day before the event (usually 27 hours) will not be charged.
Cancellations received after 4pm on the business day before the
event will be charged unless those seats can be resold. All
no-shows will be charged.


richard, thanks for your confirm as to filing.
what can we expect re the objection process? timeline, formal objection
process etc?? how will our contingent indemnity claim be handled?
can you look to see what indenture trustee filed? whether other underwriters
filed claims such as our indemnity claim? i am sure the documents are
voluminous, but we would be interested in a summary.
thanks for your quick help and diligence.
feel free to email us as progresses. please copy both richard sanders and
myself. richard.sanders@enron.com.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393


F.U.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just kidding.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Gay, Randall L.; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Huang, Jason; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Lisk, Daniel; Reitmeyer, Jay; Sanchez, Monique; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Sullivan, Patti; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	Work Hours

Dear West,

We talked briefly on Monday about our commitment to a full work day at Enron.  If you are in the office, then please be prepared to contribute to the group for a full day.  Our schedule now calls for critical communication in the afternoons.  We need to know that each employee will be here every day to create the consistency needed to outperform the rest of the market.

We want to remain as flexible as possible with all traders when it comes to an emergency, but remember that you have a commitment to Enron to contribute a full work day.

Please organize your vacation on the west desk calendar with Ina and coordinate any early afternoon departures with Ina and myself.  Also, prepare to have your markets covered when you leave the office early.

Sincerely,

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dean, Clint
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Curry, Mike; Jester, Larry
Subject:	industrial load locations

Gentlemen,
I am in the process of putting together an ERCOT industrial load database.  It will be something that in the future will help us value load in Texas.  As you know, one of the factors in determining price is location.  Could you please provide me with the locations of these customers so that I can correctly assign a CSC zone to them.

Airproducts
Alcoa
BOC gases
Corrugated Services [Larry Jester]  	S, SA
Crown [Larry Jester]  	Reliant
Huntsman [Larry Jester]  	Odessa
Kinder Morgan [Larry Jester]  W, Synder?
Koch [Larry Jester]  	S, Corpus Christi
Praxair
TotalFina [Larry Jester]    Baytown, Crosby, LaPorte, Seabrook

I know this is a fairly generic list, but it is straight from the ERCOT region list that structure keeps, so hopefully it will be very familiar to both of you.

Thanks,
Clint


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 12:50
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Meyer                           10/31/2000 12:50 PM

To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Lincoln - EIS issue REVISED ANSWER

4.  Are the facilities FERC jurisdictional for environmental impact statement
purposes pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Part 380?
  Assuming the "facilities" are the lateral and interconnect, the answer is
no.

We noticed that the only facility with information about this issue was the
pipeline at Lincoln, although the information seemed to suggest that only the
pipeline was subject to the EIS process.  See 2.02.12.G.  Was the rest of the
Lincoln facility subject to the EIS process?

 Fred - someone other than me will have to answer this question as I assume
the "Lincoln facility" refers to the plant.
 I also need to see document 2.02.12G in order to see why they believe the
pipeline was subject to the EIS process.

 What was the outcome of the EIS process for the pipeline?

 The interconnect facilities upstream of the intersection of the lateral and
N. Border's Manhattan Station are subject to FERC jurisdiction.  N. Border
completed the hot tap and interconnect facilities ( the permanent will be
finished by December 1) under its blanket authorization and in compliance
with any notice and/or permitting requirements.  As for the lateral, this was
handled by Peoples.  Fred or Dave may be in a better position to ascertain
any EIS process completed by Peoples.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Booth, Khymberly
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Netco employees

I have just received confirmation for the employees who will be going over to Netco.

Netco transfers:
Chuanli Deng
Nelson Neale
Martin Lin

Jason Solok and Thomas Barkley will be released with most of your group on 1/15/02.

KB


How about some new carpet?  I HATE THE CARPET IN THE BEDROOM, although it
does hide dog hair well.  If we want to stick with dark carpet, I like the
green upstairs.

ckm


Juliusz,

Sorry, I have to cancel the lunch meeting today.

Pleas, give a call sometimes today. Maybe we can meet for drinks Friday
afternoon.

I am taking the next week off.

Vince

Julius Zajda
12/19/2000 09:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lunch

Dzien dobry,

Mam nadzieje, ze nic sie nie zmienilo i jestesmy umowieni na dziesiejszy
lunch. Proponuje sie spotkac o godzinie 12.00 na parterze obok biurka
"security ladies" (bo wiem gdzie to jest). Ubrany jestem w czarne spodnie,
bezowe buty i szara bluze. Nie jestem pewien czy bede mogl przeczytac
potwierdzenie, bo od 10 do 11.45 przeprowadzam szkolenie.

Juliusz


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020511.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS4'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


From OpinionJournal.com (http://opinionjournal.com)

TODAY ON OPINIONJOURNAL

On the Editorial Page
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/?id=95001759

Stephen Ambrose's plagiarism is no indictment of popular history.
12:01 a.m. EST

From the Heartland BY THOMAS J. BRAY
http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/tbray/?id=95001758

Greens see red as visitors enjoy white powder in Yellowstone.
12:01 a.m. EST

Citizen of the World BY TUNKU VARADARAJAN
http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/tvaradarajan/?id=95001760

A looney-tune lawmaker goes daffy over bugs.
12:01 a.m. EST

FOR WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE SUBSCRIBERS
Review & Outlook

A Rich Tax Debate
Ted Kennedy's plans for a tax hike.
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011661259252904360.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Fabulous Florida
A little sunshine in state pension reform.
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011661444880819360.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Commentary

Too Gray for Its Own Good
If accounting wasn't so boring, maybe the Enron disaster could've been diverted.
By Baruch Lev
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011663305696657240.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Don't Indict 'Popular History'
Hollywood didn't make Stephen Ambrose commit plagiarism.
By Mark Lewis
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011660079828915240.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

The 1990s' Boom Went Bust. What's Next?
Could this be a deep recession?
By Milton Friedman
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011663602461321440.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Global View

Steel's Shakedown Attempt Will Test Bush's Resolve
A bailout would undermine the great proponent of free trade.
By George Melloan
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB101167491631745920.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Review & Outlook Taste

Arrested Development
Review & Outlook: Myrna Opsahl, murdered by terrorists in 1975, may finally get justice.
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011310728480928600.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Taste Feature

Meet, Compete
The ordeal of entrance exams -- for 11-year-olds.
By Amy Finnerty
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011311559867843680.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Fashionable Words, Striking Poses: So Is War . . . Cool?
De Gustibus: The shell shock has worn off, and our humor is returning.
By Tunku Varadarajan
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011312163339066600.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Houses of Worship

Abuse on Trial
Houses of Worship: An ex-priest faces a jury and the church faces tough questions.
By Charles Molineaux
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011311981693584600.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

International

The EDF Stone Wall
France and the EU are in a showdown over electricity, but we've seen this play before.
Review & Outlook
From The Wall Street Journal Europe
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011653098494351480.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Time of Reckoning
The Saudi royal family can continue double-dealing only so much longer.
By David Pryce-Jones
From The Wall Street Journal Europe
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011653315576757280.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Tips for O'Neill
Here's what the U.S. Treasury secretary should tell Japan.
Review & Outlook
From The Asian Wall Street Journal
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011652517687191320.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

Who Rules Japan? Nobody.
Japan's lost decade is the direct result of a political system that demands consensus while discouraging accountability.
By Ron Bevacqua
From The Asian Wall Street Journal
Jan 22 2002

http://interactive.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinemaowsj&subURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB1011652691962648160.htm&nonsubURI=http%3A%2F%2Finteractive.wsj.com%2Ftour

~~~~~~~

_____
ADVERTISEMENT
A Special Offer from THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE
Sign up now for your 2-week free trial of The Wall Street Journal Online. Your annual subscription, plus two weeks free, costs $59 or just $29 with proof of your print subscription to any edition of The Wall Street Journal or Barron's. Click here to get started. Then just fill out the form that appears next and read and accept our Subscriber Agreement.
http://www.wsj.com/cgi-bin/wsjgate?source=jopinem&URI=http%3A//www.wsj.com/59standard

_____

From time to time Dow Jones may send you e-mails with information about new features and special offers for selected Dow Jones products. If you do not wish to receive these emails in the future, you may visit http://opinionjournal.com/forms/email_acct.html. You can also unsubscribe at the same link.

You can also review OpinionJournal's privacy policy at http://opinionjournal.com/about/privacy.html

If you have been forwarded this email and wish to subscribe visit http://opinionjournal.com/forms/get_email_page.html.

Copyright 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Thanks for the note and I enjoyed seeing you the other night.  We are working
with Jeff's assistant on the date.  It looks like it may be possible but
there are a few conflicts to dodge.  We will be in touch soon.  Thanks

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/20/2000 11:12:46 AM
To: rcausey@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince,

Good morning.

In my 9/14 e-mail, I advised you of the practitioner-industry CEFER (Center
for Energy Finance Education and Research) Conference we are planning for
Spring 2001.  As you know, we would like to invite Jeff Skilling to be the
keynote speaker at the Thur. evening dinner.  The following day's four
topics consist of Risk management, Deregulation, Real options, and
International/globalization.  The majority of invitees would be
(predominantly U. S.-based) energy-industry practitioners, as well as
several academics.

Given lead time issues in these matters, we have reserved hotel rooms in
Austin for Feb. 22, 2001.  Could I ask you to ascertain Jeff Skilling's
availability for that evening?

Thanks,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Friday, June 1, 2001

Dear MATHEW,

Travelocity's Fare Watcher, your ultimate tool for keeping on top of
rapidly changing air fares, found fare changes in 1 of the markets
you are watching.  When you review the airfares below, remember that
fares change rapidly!  Low fares sell out quickly, and the sooner you
check, the more likely you are to find available seats.

Have your travel needs changed? Are you looking to go someplace new?
Remember to update your Fare Watcher subscription so that you're
always notified when fares change to your favorite destinations.

To find one of the fares below, point your web browser to your
Personal Fare Watcher Page on Travelocity by clicking on the
following URL link.  You can also copy and paste the URL into your
browser.

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=05J9G74|TRAVELOCITY

==================   FARES  ============================

*  IAH-NYC   FROM: HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH)
             TO:   NEW YORK ALL AIRPRTS (NYC)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $208.00      $260.00     -$52.00

See below for important information on these fares.
===========  OF SPECIAL INTEREST ==============

Special summer fares available now from Hawaiian Airlines, the wings of the islands. Non-stop daily flights to Honolulu with connecting service to your favorite island from Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles and beginning June 15 – San Diego.
Visit http://direct.travelocity.com/adclick/CID=00001f60f47ad30400000000/exclusive=travelres.generic.fwem.position1

========  Travelocity Hotel Value Rates  =============

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:

NEW YORK ALL AIRPRTS (NYC) starting at just $69
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=NYC&rate_cat=V

===================   VACATIONS AND CRUISE PACKAGES ======

VACATION DEALS! Hot deals to the Caribbean, LAs Vegas, and more!
Check out our daily offerings of deals for vacation packages and tours.
See all of the great deals right now at
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS! Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals!
Updated daily, this area features the best cruise rates to a host of fabulous
ports of call.  Find the voyage that suits your budget at
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

=====================   EXCLUSIVE MEMBER BENEFITS     ================

Introducing the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program.
Get exclusive members-only savings including: 5% off Travelocity GoodBuy Fares, airline club lounge passes, $15 off Hertz weekly rentals, up to 20% off at 7,000 restaurants nationwide, and much more.  Receive a free weekender bag when you enroll today.
Visit http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PM.
 .
The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with the new Travelocity World MasterCard!  You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent.  Earn 8,000 points and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.  Well spot you 4,000 points to get you started, so you're already half way there! Visit  http://www.travelocitycard.com to apply.

=====================   CUSTOMER SERVICE  ==================

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:
  All fares are quoted in US Dollars.  Fares shown are for one
  adult round-trip between your selected cities and are subject
  to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger
  Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of
  $2.75 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and
  taxes/fees associated with international itineraries of up to
  USD $113 or local currency equivalent. Fuel surcharges, if applicable
  are included in the fees listed.

  Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
  be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
  that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
  all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
  of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

HOW DO I:

* CHANGE OR CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL?-

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* ?PDATE MY EMAIL ADDRESS?

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* RETRIEVE MY PASSWORD?

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:57 PM -----

	Tori L Wells@ECT
	02/20/2001 12:54 PM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael L Moran/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Secretary of Def. Corp. Fellowship Program - 03/07/01

Rob:

Mr. Lay will no longer be giving the presentation at the above mentioned
event, Steve Kean will.  If you have prepared anything for this, will you
please get it to Steve?

Thank you, and if you have any questions please let me know.

Tori


For your reference in the 10:30 am (CST) meeting tomorrow, I have attached a memo outlining the potential WBI storage blowdown deal.  Please contact myself or Mark Whitt if you have any questions ahead of the meeting.

Regards,
Tyrell Harrison
(303) 575-6478


I think we should get him a card and tell him his present will be there when my furniture gets there.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Dan
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	Dad's b-day is in 10 days - what should we do?

Dan Dorland
Enron Canada
(416) 865-3714


we were thinking lupe tortillas @ 6:30

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 03/30/2001 10:08:04 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: funnies

How about we meet at that Restaurant right next to the Aerial theatre at
6:45?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 8:39 AM
To: JBass@stdauto.com
Subject: Re: funnies

i got your tickets

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 03/30/2001 08:51:12 AM

To:
cc:
Subject:? funnies

(See attached file: fortune.jpg)
(See attached file: bombtech.jpg)
(See attached file: airolane.jpg)
(See attached file: watchp.jpg)


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 09:58 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/26/2001 10:11 AM

		 To: <smara@enron.com>, <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron in Sac Bee

FYI, in case you haven't already seen this:

CalPERS has big energy tie
By John Hill
Bee Capitol Bureau
(Published March 26, 2001)

When Californians complain about energy outlaws romping through the chaotic
electricity market, carting wagonloads of money to Texas, one name often
tops the list: Enron Corp.

But at least one pretty sizeable wagon full of cash has not gone home to
energy moguls in 10-gallon hats, but rather to retired California government
workers on pensions.

For eight years, Enron has had an unusual investment partnership with the
California Public Employees' Retirement System, the fund that administers
retirement and health benefits to more than 1 million past and present
public employees.

Most recently, the two agreed in 1998 to pony up half a billion dollars each
for business ventures in energy companies, including Enron subsidiaries --
although not the one that markets electricity in California.

CalPERS and Enron have, on average, doubled their money each year. That
makes the Enron deal one of the pension fund's most lucrative.

CalPERS owns stock in thousands of companies, including high-performing
electricity generators and lagging utilities. But Enron is one of fewer than
10 companies involved in this kind of venture with the pension fund.

"Enron is one of our oldest and closest relationships here in the
alternative investment area," Barry Gonder, a CalPERS senior investment
officer, told a CalPERS committee last October. "And as you all know, it's a
highly innovative and successful company."

All true, but in California, Enron has been a major player in the
electricity market, and the company and its chairman, Kenneth Lay, a
prominent supporter of President Bush, have become lightning rods for
high-voltage rage.

"Lay pockets millions every year into his personal account and now he wants
us to pay him more," a Sacramento resident asserted in a letter to The Bee
last month. " ... The power companies are reducing power to drive up prices
and put more money in the pockets of people such as Lay."

Enron has been making scads of money -- profits were up 34 percent in the
fourth quarter of 2000. But the company won't say how much of this comes
from California, and minimizes the importance of this market.

Despite the hostility toward Enron, no one has asked CalPERS about the
arrangement, said spokeswoman Patricia Macht.

Even if it did cause an outcry, CalPERS doesn't make investment decisions
based on the popularity of the companies. Even when CalPERS divested itself
of tobacco stocks recently, it justified the decision by citing lawsuits and
regulatory actions that could sour the investments.

In fact, Macht said, CalPERS is barred by its fiduciary responsibility to
its members from applying social filters that are not in keeping with their
financial best interests.

"It's a slippery slope," she said. "If we do it for energy now, what's to
say a month later, a legislator or interest group who has a beef against a
single company" might also demand that CalPERS sell its stock.

At the October meeting, CalPERS committee sessions didn't address Enron's
role in the electricity crisis. State Controller Kathleen Connell, however,
asked Andy Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer, how power shortages
affected Enron's profits.

"How does Enron benefit from that, and what can you do to maximize this fuel
energy shortage, not only now but as we move into the future?" Connell
asked. She was unavailable for comment Thursday and Friday.

Consumer advocates said they were surprised to learn of the CalPERS
connection to Enron.

"I guess it's nice that some folks on retirement income get a soft landing
because they were thrown into cahoots with marauders," said Nettie Hoge of
the Utility Reform Network in San Francisco, an advocacy group. But she
added, "It's a short-term return for a bargain with the devil."

The CalPERS relationship with Enron goes back to 1993, before California
even embarked on its ill-starred energy deregulation experiment.

At the time, the energy sector was out of favor with investors. CalPERS
figured that the reputation masked some good opportunities, and decided to
start putting money in energy, said Gonder, the CalPERS investment officer.
CalPERS needed a partner that understood the industry. Enron was an obvious
choice.

Enron had its own reasons to hook up with CalPERS.

The company did not respond to requests for comment. But in the October
CalPERS committee meeting, Fastow said that Enron has been investing about
$7 billion a year in the energy and communications industries. "So we need a
lot of capital," he said. Cal-

PERS, with assets of $165 billion, is one of the biggest pots of money
around.

Enron could have issued stock for the investments. But as a public company,
it has to worry about showing quick returns, Fastow said. A pension fund, he
said, could provide "more patient money."

As it turns out, CalPERS patience has not been tried. In the initial 1993
deal, Enron and Cal-PERS both kicked in $250 million. By the time CalPERS
cashed out five years later, it had earned an average yearly return of 23
percent.

"We said, 'It's working for both of us, so let's continue,'" Gonder said.

In 1998, the two created a $1 billion fund to invest in oil and gas, coal
and electricity companies -- everything from oil rigs to high-tech
electricity meters.

About $38 million of CalPERS money went to Enron Energy Services, which
sells natural gas and electricity to industrial and commercial customers and
helps them figure out better ways to keep down their energy use and costs.
Three years later, CalPERS sold the investment back to Enron for about $124
million, for a profit of $86 million.

Another investment did even better. In 1999, the partnership put up $80
million to buy some New Jersey cogeneration plants, which produce both
electricity and steam. A mere four months later, a 49 percent interest in
the plants, which cost the partnership $39.2 million, was sold to another
company for $150 million.

Each partner has invested about $300 million so far, with an average yearly
rate of return of 100 percent. The remaining money in the partnership is
expected to last another seven or eight years.


I also need to sign up for the executive impact and influence course

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/22/2000
08:13 PM ---------------------------

Becky Tlucek
07/20/2000 04:00 PM
To: Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashton
Soniat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Hebert/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie
Jewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Zaccour/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Miller/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Douglas
SMITH/ENRON@Gateway, Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erik
Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared
Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES,
Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence
Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup
Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Bir/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Anthony Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael W Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Peter F
Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect,
Ronald Acevedo/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wayne
Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Antitrust Training

Please see the attached memo regarding the Antitrust Training.


Shelley,

Attached is a draft notice for the reinstatement of the old Shipper Scheduled Quantities report.  I will have Legale post the final notice after your changes and  approval.

 Thx, Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 07:42
AM ---------------------------

Jennifer Burns

10/23/2000 07:40 AM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

That's weird......because Jeff and I were talking about Bill on Friday, I
didn't get the picture that Jeff thought he was that great. And Bill hasn't
been up here at all??????  I won't say anything.....

John Arnold
10/23/2000 07:30 AM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

No, i thought you would have known.  don't tell shank i told you.

Jennifer Burns

10/22/2000 07:24 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

WHAT?????????  You are shitting me!!!!!!

John Arnold
10/22/2000 06:26 PM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

i heard he's interviewing to be Shankman's right hand man

Jennifer Burns

10/20/2000 02:12 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

I saw Bill Perkins today, he was on 33.  I heard someone call my name and I
was like hey Bill.  Weird huh?


you are long at np, because i did not put a imbalance deal in.  I figured you
were going to sell that 10 mws of np length off to a sc on a realtime basis.
So, please take care of this


As you may have heard, President Bush signed the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 into law (the "Law") this morning.  The Law
reduces personal income tax rates, modifies the AMT and Estate Tax and makes
several changes to retirement and education savings incentives.  Further, due
to the reduction in the personal income tax rates (through the creation of a
new 10 percent tax bracket carved out from the previous 15 percent bracket)
without a reduction to the amount currently withheld under the Federal
withholding tax regime, all taxpayers are slated to receive a rebate of taxes
that otherwise would have been paid this year - this is the $300, 500 or 600
"tax refund" that you may have heard of in connection with the Law.  The
attached documents describe in greater detail the changes I have just
described.  As always, I can be reached at x30938 should you have any
questions.  Best regards.  SHD.


Good News!
IT Hot Jobs have been extended

$5000
REWARD

for successful referral and hiring will be continued until further notice

Please see the Human Resources website at http://hrweb.enron.com for a
complete hot job listing.

Get paid lots of $$$ for who YOU know!  Just complete the Employee Referral
form, attach a resume and submit to the Employee Referral mailbox.  It's that
easy!

Before submitting a referral, please read the attached policy for eligibility
guidelines and procedures.  After February 1st, referrals not submitted
through the proper ER procedure will not be eligible for bonus payments.  A
form MUST be completed and submitted prior to the candidate being interviewed
in order to be bonus eligible.   There will be NO exceptions, so please read
the attached Enron Employee Referral Policy and Form.


Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Waggoner, Terri" <twaggoner@ercot.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:48 PM
> To:	1 Texas Test Plan Team; 1 2001 RMS and others(Retail Market
> Sub.)
> Subject:	RMS Meetings October 31 and November 1
>
>
> The next 2 RMS meetings will be October 31 and November 1st. The
> meeting on Wednesday, October 31 will be held at the Hilton Austin
> Airport hotel in Room Bergstrom B from 9:30 a.m.- 5 p.m.   Thursday's
> meeting on November 1st will be held at ERCOT in Room 206 A from 9:30
> a.m.- 5 p.m.  If you plan to attend these meetings please reply to
> this email so I may record your RSVP for lunch.
> Terri Waggoner
> desk: 512-225-7027
> fax:512-225-7045
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Barry Tycholiz has asked me to confirm for you that we do have a master in
place with Husky.  We do, indeed, and I will shoot a copy down to you.


Dan,

I am sending Energy one Ventures BAC agreement.  Please make the appropriate
marks.

Thanks,

Sylvia Pollan
---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

"Owens, Kathie" <KOwens@UtiliCorp.com> on 03/27/2001 01:05:59 PM
To: "'sylvia.s.pollan@enron.com'" <sylvia.s.pollan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: BAC agreement

Sylvia,
Attached is the agreement that was sent to you.
Any questions, call me.  402-926-5291.
Thanks,
Kathie

 <<ENR-EOV-1.doc>>

 - ENR-EOV-1.doc


I'm going over the Park & Loan discounts on CNG for May.  I need to see the
invoice to compare what we were billed to what CNG is showing on the discount
letter.

Gloria, Terry does not have the invoice.  Could you get me a copy please?

Thanks.


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Henry H Quigley
Report Name: Quigley 100301
Days In Mgr. Queue: 5


they are saying that trade is good and was checked out twice.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/30/2001 04:36 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

These deals were in under Prebon - 509009/010 have been changed to APB.

Tom does not recognize last deal.

K

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/30/2001 02:33 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals for tom a

sell srp
31st
50 mw
260.00
pv

sell sempra
feb
25 mw
240.00
sp-15

buy sempra
feb
25 mw
245.00
pv

thanks


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Monday, May  14, 2001 2:14 PM
To:	Giovannini, Jana
Cc:	Thomas, Sheri; Zipper, Andy
Subject:	RE: Missing summer interns for Brent Price

Your list does not include any interns under Brent Price ( he is one of my direct reports as well).  I understood that he does have some summer interns.  Can you update this list for me to include his interns?

Also, as of April 1, Sheri Thomas now reports to Andy Zipper in ENW, and not to me.  We included her on the distribution of resumes for summer interships since she originally was part of my team.  From this point forward, however, you should communicate directly with Sheri and Andy Zipper regarding Greg Carlson's internship.  I just want to make sure that nothing falls through the cracks for these interns as we make organizational changes.  .  Thanks.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giovannini, Jana
Sent:	Monday, May  14, 2001 1:21 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Cc:	McLoughlin, Hector; Richards, Andrea; Buckley, Karen; Wilson, Shona; Apollo, Beth; Thomas, Sheri; Hall, Bob M; Scribner, James; Bland Jr., Ted C.
Subject:

Sally,
Please see the list below of the Analyst Interns that will be starting in your groups and their perspective start dates:

Supervisor		Analyst			Start Date
Shona Wilson		Daniel Hyslop		May 21, 2001
Shona Wilson		Jason Jenkins		May 21, 2001
Beth Apollo		Neha Yajnik		June 4, 2001
Sheri Thomas		Greg Carlson		May 21, 2001
Bob Hall		Cathy Wang		May 21, 2001
Bob Hall		Ebony Watts		May 21, 2001
James Scribner		Jennifer Reimer		May 21, 2001
James Scribner		Andre White		May 21, 2001
Leslie Reeves		Korynne Bernard	May 21, 2001
Leslie Reeves		Denka Wangdi		June 4, 2001
Brenda Herod		Jason Marye		May 21, 2001

Please let me know if you have any additional questions regarding the Intern's that have been selected for your groups.  We will be following up with each of your direct reports with the Interns social security numbers in order for them to set up each of the Interns work stations.  Thanks so much.


Sara:
I would prefer not to but will if you can't.
Carol