Please call the help desk at 713-853-4777 for assistance.


Texas has the items and we are reviewing with Brenda on Tuesday and running
through on Wednesday.
PL


FYI.  Per our call today, some press from Saturday referencing PG&E's
opposition to having Comrade Davis buy its Tx assets.

Power-Lines Deal
Davis, Edison come to terms but PG&E remains a balky holdout
Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday,?February 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/02/24/M
N184206.DTL
Gov. Gray Davis said yesterday he had reached an agreement with Southern
California Edison to put the state's financially ailing utilities back on
their feet - but Pacific Gas and Electric Co., crucial to any deal, remained
a holdout.
The key to the deal is state purchase of utility transmission lines, which
would help the companies pay off debt they piled up selling electricity for
less than it cost them. Edison will part with its lines for $2.76 billion,
Davis said.
But PG&E is reluctant to sell, and the governor said no deal will work
without PG&E.
In addition to agreeing to sell its transmission lines, Edison said it would
produce inexpensive power to sell to the state for the next 10 years.
At a news conference in Los Angeles, Davis said the agreement in principle
with Edison "provides value to both sides. The utility gets the financial
wherewithal to go back into business and keep our lights on. We get
commensurate value in specific benefits, which provide us long-term power at
very cheap rates."
Davis' framework for righting California's wobbly energy market, however,
hinges on a similar agreement with PG&E. Those familiar with the talks
involving the utility, based in San Francisco, said discussions are moving
"very, very slowly."
"They are adamantly resistant to selling their transmission facilities," said
Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek.
Ron Low, a spokesman for PG&E, did not comment on Keeley's statement, but
after talks concluded Thursday, Low said the two sides were "very far apart"
on some issues.
In a statement yesterday, PG&E Corporate Chairman Robert Glynn said the
"discussions were an important milestone in the resolution of California's
energy crisis."
"Each utility's issues and opportunities in this crisis are different, and we
believe that PG&E has proposed a detailed solution that balances ratepayer
and shareholder interests," Glynn said. "We are confident that continued
discussions can achieve a resolution for our company."
Davis said he made "good" progress with Sempra Energy, the parent company of
San Diego Gas & Electric, but only "some" progress with PG&E.
Davis ruled out a deal that does not include PG&E.
"I don't believe we can make a satisfactory arrangement without acquiring 60
percent of the transmission lines. That, in turn, requires us to have an
arrangement with PG&E," he said. The other 40 percent of the grid is owned by
municipal utilities.
Keeley said Davis is right to insist that PG&E be part of any deal.
"I think the deal announced is a good first step, and will hopefully put
pressure on the other companies," Keeley said.
CRITICS CALL DEAL BAILOUT
The purchase price set for Edison's transmission lines is 2.3 times the
system's book value. Although critics argue that represents a bailout,
supporters of the plan say the lines are worth far more than book value.
For example, the cost to replace all the utilities' transmission lines -- a
figure that probably would come into play during a possible bankruptcy -- is
estimated at $20 billion. If the state pays 2.3 times the book value for all
three utilities' systems, it will pay $7.2 billion total.
The agreement with Edison follows a framework Davis announced last week. In
exchange for the purchase of the lines, Edison also agreed to return $420
million that the utility had sent to its parent company, establish
conservation easements on 20,000 acres of watershed for 99 years and drop all
litigation against the state demanding the ability to immediately raise
rates.
Edison also agreed to continue to sell the power it produces to the state at
cost for another 10 years.
Edison said it still believed that it would have won its lawsuit to recover
costs through a rate increase. But Edison International Chairman John Bryson
said, "This agreement is far preferable to perhaps years of protracted
litigation."
NO RATE INCREASE
Davis continued to insist that the deal would not require a rate increase,
although he has indicated that the rate increase adopted by the state Public
Utilities Commission last month -- which was supposed to last 90 days --
would stay in place.
Davis has been under pressure to meet deadlines he has imposed himself for
making progress in the energy crisis, which he said were designed to reassure
Wall Street. However, he also had a personal stake in making yesterday's
announcement, as he left immediately for a five-day trip to the East Coast.
Davis will spend four days at the National Governors Association in
Washington, D.C., and a concurrent meeting of the Democratic Governors
Association, which he chairs.
Much of his time will be spent reassuring his fellow governors that the
crisis is under control, as well as meeting with President Bush and Energy
Secretary Spencer Abraham.
DAVIS ON 'MEET THE PRESS'
Davis also will use the time to make national media appearances, including
one on "Meet the Press" tomorrow. Garry South, Davis' political strategist,
said the appearances will allow Davis to address some East Coast media
accounts of the energy crisis.
"A lot of misconceptions and myths have crept in," South said. "It's not
helpful to California; it's not accurate on how the crisis came about and how
we're trying to solve it."
After he leaves Washington, Davis will spend a day in New York to meet with
Wall Street analysts. Yesterday, he suggested that he would be asking for
their support in California's quest for revenue bonds to help pay for power
purchases.
California will have spent $2.8 billion on power by next month, and its
credit ratings have been downgraded by some analysts.
Consumer advocates reacted with skepticism to Davis' tentative deal with
Edison.
Nettie Hoge, executive director of TURN, The Utility Reform Network, said she
was displeased with the governor's plan because it commits ratepayers to
paying off an unidentified portion of utility debt.
"Nothing says what the final price tag is," she said.
Dealing for Power
-- Power lines: The state would buy Southern California Edison's transmission
lines for about $2.7 billion, 2.3 times their estimated book value, to help
bail out the financially strapped utility.
-- Helping out: Edison parent Edison International would pay the utility
about $420 million.
-- Payback: Edison would drop its lawsuit seeking higher electricity rates
and would to continue to sell the state cheap power for another 10 years.
-- The other shoe: ''Some progress'' reported in talks over a similar deal
with PG&E, which is reluctant to sell its lines.
Source: Associated Press
Other Developments
ENERGY FORECAST
California enjoyed its second straight day without a power alert. Lori
O'Donley, spokeswoman for the California Independent System Operator said
continued warm weather around the West and completion of maintenance on some
power plants that had been out of operation kept the state above the percent
reserve mark. O'Donley said the state should remain out of the danger zone
during the weekend.
MORE MEGAWATTS COMING
Mirant Corp., announced that it signed a contract to provide 750 megawatts of
power to the state during the month of March. "We became more confident in
our ability to enter such a contract after we received full payment from the
Department of Water Resources for a bill due Feb. 20," said Randy Harrison,
executive director of the company's western operations.
INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR SETTLEMENT
Three generators reached a settlement with the California Independent System
Operator to continue to supply emergency power to California until March 18
even though it is unclear who will pay for much of that power.
Reliant Energy Inc., Williams Cos. and Dynegy Inc. signed an agreement that
effectively extended a U.S. District Court judge's temporary restraining
order that had required the generators to supply power to the power grid
operators.
In the meantime, the three generators, along with Duke Energy Corp. and
Mirant Corp., have asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for an
emergency order forcing the Independent System Operator to provide a
creditworthy buyer for their power.
The federal commission on Feb. 14 told the system operator that it could not
force generators to take on "unacceptable financial risks" by selling without
a reasonable expectation of being paid.
CONSERVATION REWARD
State Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland, said he will propose legislation to give $1
billion to customers who conserve on their electricity bills during the
summer months. Perata claims that his bill, which would pay consumers a $10
refund for every megawatt hour saved, would reduce the amount of money that
the state would have to spend buying power on the expensive spot market.
Source: Chronicle staff report
Chronicle staff writer Patrick Hoge contributed to this report. / E-mail
Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A1


FYI
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/29/2000 09:01 AM -----

	"WENDY EDWARDSON" <wendy.edwardson@blakes.com>
	10/27/2000 10:00 AM

		 To: <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "DALTON MCGRATH" <dalton.mcgrath@blakes.com>, "DAN FOURNIER"
<dan.fournier@blakes.com>, "GLENN LESLIE" <glenn.leslie@blakes.com>, "MARK
MORRISON" <mark.morrison@blakes.com>, "WEB MACDONALD"
<web.macdonald@blakes.com>
		 Subject: 83829/44 Enron Canada re Special matter - Project Stanley

Status Report re: tape transcripts

At this time, this summary has been sent to you only.

Counsel for Powerex has indicated that he now has instructions to share with
us the information that has been seized from their offices by the Bureau in
exchange for our providing similar information to them.

He has also indicated to us that between the 19th and the 25th of October,
the Bureau came to Vancouver and listened to the Powerex tapes using Powerex
equipment in that they had been unable to listen to them with their own
equipment.

As you are aware, the tapes seized from the Enron offices in Calgary cover
the period of September of 1999 to the end of October.

The tapes which we have listened to, but which they have not seized, cover
the period commencing in late May of 1999 to September, 1999.

With respect to the tapes that they have seized, initially we exerted a claim
of privilege to all of the tapes.  The Bureau has now come back to us and has
asked us to clarify how we would propose resolving the privilege question.
We have volunteered to have this discussion with them, but to this point in
time, they have not responded to us.

If, as and when the conversation occurs, our position will be that we intend
to claim privilege with respect to conversations with lawyers only.  How this
particular aspect of the matter would be resolved is not as yet clear.

Our view is that with respect to the conversations they have, they are not
particularly damaging but the conversations do not particularly add to the
flavour of the matter to our benefit.

On Wednesday of next week, we will be meeting with counsel for Powerex to see
exactly which conversations they have delivered to the Bureau.  We will
advise him of the conversations that have been taken by the Bureau from our
offices and at the conclusion of this matter, we should be able to see
exactly what it is that the Bureau has in terms of conversations between
Powerex and Enron.

We look forward to discussing this matter with you at your convenience.

Yt
Web Macdonald


---------------------- Forwarded by Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 12:05
PM ---------------------------
   Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman

From: Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 10/12/2000
11:36 AM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENA and EGM Employees, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Europe
cc: Executive Committee and Assistants
Subject: Organization Announcement

We are pleased to announce the following organization changes within Enron
Global Markets (EGM).

Larry Lawyer will be joining EGM effective immediately to lead our new
finance activities.  In this role, he will work with all commodity products,
assets, and teams worldwide to lever our existing businesses with this new
focus.  Larry has worked as treasurer and was responsible for 3rd party
financing for EBS for the last year.  He has worked for Enron for 4 1/2 years
in various positions in the finance area.  He will be reporting to the Office
of the Chairman.

Eric Gonzales will be joining the LNG team and will co-head this effort with
Rick Bergsieker.  We believe there is significant opportunity in the
worldwide LNG markets, and Eric will direct all merchant activity and focus
on the Atlantic regions of the world.  He will also manage the LNG shipping
book.  Eric is located in the London office and also has responsibility for
leading the newly formed Pool Markets origination group reporting to Joe
Gold.

Rick Bergsieker has relocated to Dubai, in the UAE.  He is responsible for
all Middle East activities and projects, managing the Puerto Rico assets and
will co-head the worldwide LNG efforts.  Rick has over 20 years of LNG
experience and together, he and Eric will form an outstanding leadership team
as we expand Enron,s LNG activities around the world.  They both will report
to the Office of the Chairman.

Jennifer Fraser will come over and develop our market fundamentals group for
all products in EGM, much like ENA natural gas and power fundamentals and
Intranet pages existing today.  Previously, Jennifer was working in the Mid
Market origination group.  Heather Purcell will be joining this group
developing the commercial interface for our Intranet page.  Heather was with
Azurix, where she worked on the platform interface for their eBusiness
initiatives.

Gary Hickerson will be chairing our Traders, Roundtable.  This new group will
be comprised of traders across Enron's wholesale trading and risk management
businesses.  This forum will give traders the opportunity to discuss topics
important to their individual markets, and to learn and explore other markets
in a macro sense.  Also, we will be forming a cross-commodity trading group.
Traders who have shown extremely strong and consistent profitability will
have the opportunity to join this group and to exploit cross-commodity
opportunities with a bias toward structural shifts in markets.  This group
will not be involved in customer activity and will execute through our
principal desks.   Gary will manage this new group, as well as continuing
with his current F/X, Rates, Equity, and Agriculture initiatives.

Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new positions.
Organization charts outlining the entire EGM organization are available upon
request from Cathy Phillips.


INTERESTING MEDIA ARTICLE (SEE BELOW) FROM DOW JONES ON PRICE CONTROLS
- Ray Niles (212-816-2807)

My comments:
This is a good article explaining the complex power market in California.
Basically, the problem in California is insufficient deregulation.  The
problems are worsened by the particular mixture of controls and market
forces which combine to create imbalances.  Specifically, while retail
prices are capped, wholesale prices are market-determined except that there
are restrictions against long-term hedging.  This is a recipe for high and
volatile short-term power prices, which we have seen.

Our view is unchanged that price controls set at a meaningfully low level
will cause blackouts by creating an imbalance between supply and demand.
This is elementary economics.  Price controls reduce supply (electrons flow
elsewhere seeking higher prices and power plants don't get built) while
demand remains artificially high (customers respond to the low, controlled
prices by maintaining consumption at high levels).

Price caps are THE issue now facing the industry.  We think meaningfully low
caps will not be instituted.  If they are, they contain a "self-repeal"
mechanism -- i.e., blackouts.  In our view, the only way to bring supply and
demand into equilibrium is through market-determined prices coupled with new
investment in power plants, electric transmission lines, gas pipelines, etc.

 <<INTERESTING MEDIA ARTICLE 5-30-01.doc>>

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

 - INTERESTING MEDIA ARTICLE 5-30-01.doc


Good.

Jim Wiltfong
08/07/2000 03:39 PM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald
Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Throughput Forecast

I would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the components for modeling TW
throughput.  The first date Kim, Lindy, Sean and I could make was Friday
August 18th.  How does everyone else's schedule look for the morning of the
18th?


Just an FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Stanley
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Pierce, Jody; Allen, Melissa; Stubblefield, Wade; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Lindholm, Tod A.; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Faldyn, Rodney
Subject:	FW: Goodwill Allocation Memorandum

See message below.  I have also included Appendix A referenced in the memorandum that includes the summary of goodwill as of June 30, 2001.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Stanley
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Colwell, Wes; Butts, Bob; Faldyn, Rodney
Cc:	Morrison, Mike
Subject:	Goodwill Allocation Memorandum

Everyone,

Attached below is the memorandum we are preparing to document Enron's position on assignment of goodwill to reporting units pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 142.  For the sake of expediency, the appendicies referenced in the memorandum have not been included for review at this time.

Please review and provide your comments back to Mike Morrison or me by next Monday afternoon if possible.

We look forward to your input.

Thanks,

Stan


ENW submitted our preliminary revised budget two weeks ago.  In our meeting in the Board Room, we did acknowledge that the ENW budget is very dependent upon the business plans of the business units that we support.  Since our budget meeting was the first that you conducted, we agreed that the ENW revised 2002 budget would need to be reviewed again once the business plans and associated budgets for other Enron business units were completed.  Has that process been completed such that we can now re-evaluate the 2002 budget for ENW?

I will follow up with you or someone on your staff on January 2 so that we can complete this budget process.

I hope that you and your family enjoyed the holidays.  --Sally


We are parking 4,875 dth/day for the 27th-30th on CNG (deal 281565) and we
are taking out 478 dth/day for the month of June (deal 281565).  ENA is
paying CNG $.04 times the total volume parked.

Angie, these volumes may go up.  I think Tenn is still trying to balance the
weekend and they are a little long.  Clarissa will let you know.


The credit language is not attached?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 04:05 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	09/19/2000 03:45 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 09/19/00

The EOL approvals for 09/19/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Wipe Out Tax Debt
End your IRS tax problems!
Message-Id: <200111011345125.SM00208@gshwvmhrm.webcrawler.com>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2001 14:06:29 -0600

Would you like to resolve IRS and State tax problems quickly and easily?
Would you like to save yourself a lot of money? Read on!

Our nationally recognized tax attorneys
paralegals
legal assistants
and licensed enrolled agents can help you no matter where you live in the US.
By directly negotiating with the IRS and State authorities we can settle your
debts for far less than what you currently owe!

For a FREE analysis and more information on this subject

please fill out the short form below and e-mail it back to us.
In the debt size field please also include any penalties or
interest that you owe.

Full Name :
State :
Phone Number :
Time to Call :
Estimated Tax Debt Size :

Thank you for your time! If you wish to receive no further such advertisements

please reply to this email with the word Remove in the subject line.

sjjdwkvbizibdqkif
E analysis and more information on this subject


Mike ---

Did you get set up on AOL instant messenger yet?  If so, what's your screen name?  I'm scotth1965.  I've got several of my usual trading partners on there and it works out pretty well.

Scott


Kay

Attached please find a proposed CA from Navigant Consulting on behalf of
Sithe regarding the potential sale of a generating facility under development
or a long-term tolling transaction.  I would like to take a look at this
opportunity and to get a copy of the Information Memo.   Could you please
review and comment on the attached CA so that we can advance on this?
Thanks much

John

978-449-9936

---------------------- Forwarded by John Llodra/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001
12:42 PM ---------------------------

LBarbas@rcgroup.com on 05/01/2001 11:33:46 AM
To: John.Llodra@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Medway Project - Confidentiality Agreement

Good Afternoon,
Thank you for your expression of interest in the Medway Project offerings.
In order to receive a copy of the Offering Memorandum you must first
execute a Confidentiality Agreement ("CA").  Attached please find a copy of
the CA for your company's execution. Please create and execute three (3)
original documents and return them to my attention at the address below.
Once we receive them back from you, we will have them executed by Sithe and
Navigant Consulting, Inc.  Immediately thereafter, a fully executed copy of
the CA, along with the Offering Memorandum will be forwarded to you.  If
there are any changes you would propose be made to this document, please
use the revision tool to highlight those changes.  I will then review your
proposed changes with Sithe's counsel and get back to you.  Thank you again
for your interest in this offering.
(See attached file: Enron-CA.DOC)
Lisa Barbas
Navigant Consulting, Inc.
200 Wheeler Rd., Suite 400
Burlington, MA  01803
Phone: (781) 564-9619
Fax:  (781) 270-0418
 - Enron-CA.DOC


per Jennifer Staton 6-6269


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000 01:29 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	07/28/2000 11:34 AM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 07/28/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/28/00


tara,

Please grant access to manage financial products to the following:

 Janie Tholt
 Frank Ermis
 Steve South
 Tory Kuykendall
 Matt Lenhart
 Randy Gay

We are making markets on one day gas daily swaps.  Thank you.

Phillip Allen


Happy New Year !
 - marks.xls


See attached summary for some excellent FERC decisions thanks to regulatory
affairs in Houston and D.C.  Given that FERC appears to be applying some of
these decisions to all utilities in these regions, I would assume we could
argue that the FERC requirements should apply in the West too.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 01:48 PM
---------------------------
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Debbie
Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Reagan
Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Berger/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mathew
Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Zhang/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen E Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com,
terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com,
kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com,
patrick.hanse@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com,
david.fairley@enron.com, ray.hoppe@enron.com, george.mccormick@enron.com,
wjennin@enron.com, joseph.wagner@enron.com, elizabeth.johnston@enron.com,
bill.rust@enron.com, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Mike
Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura
Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kayne
Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power Systems

On 11/1/00, FERC Staff issued reports on its Investigation of Bulk Power
Markets in the Eastern Interconnection.  These reports were the result of a
Commission order earlier this summer.  Enron's Federal regulatory staff
(Christi, Charles Yeung, and Sarah Novosel) provided a great deal of
information for this investigation and Joe Hartsoe and Donna Fulton discussed
many of the problems with the grid with the new head of Staff, Scott Miller
(who recently joined FERC from PG&E Gen).    While the Commission is under no
obligation to take any of Staff's recommendations, the Commission typically
looks to Staff for guidance on transmission and market issues.  Importantly,
Staff concludes that the Commission should consider these options for the
Southeast and Midwest -- all of which Enron has been asking FERC to implement
for several years:

Reduce the advantages of network service over point to point service by
requiring that native load be served under the same tariff as other
transmission services to eliminate the current incentives that VIUs have to
favor their native load through the calculation of ATC and handling of
interconnection requests.

While the Staff Hotline is used productively, the Commission can direct Staff
to conduct formal investigations into entities that have a pattern of
complaints.

The Commission could require TPs to submit tariff provisions containing a pro
forma interconnection process specific to interconnection, rather than simply
relying on the Tennessee Power order that utilizes the OATT timelines and
procedures.

Require TPs to retain real-time transmission data on market functions
pertaining to daily load, internal generation to meet that load, and imports
and exports.

RTOs should submit the basis and methods for calculating ATC and TTC, as well
as standardized criteria for curtailment.  In addition, since even such
standardized criteria might not "get to the root of the problem" -- that
control area still control generation -- the Commission could require that
each RTO set a date certain by which it will create one control area.
Regardless of the implementation of these two options, the Commission could
standardize ATC and TTC methodology.

Staff finds that while electricity is a commodity with market characteristics
similar to many other commodities, it is still viewed as "different," with a
reaction of price caps.  Staff encourages that basic decisions about the
regulatory model be made in order to complete the transition from a
traditional cost-of-service model to a model that uses markets to price the
commodity and services.

DETAILS  (Also, the reports contain good summaries of the generation,
transmission, state retail, federal reg. and other issues for the region):

Midwest:  The Midwest is dominated by vertically integrated Transmission
Providers ("TPs") that control transmission, generation and load.  "As such,
they have weak economic incentives to provide access to transmission service
to third-parties and strong incentives to favor their own services."  Staff
received numerous complaints; however, due to the lack of information
available from TPs, Staff cannot conclude whether these are isolated
incidents or wide-spread.  At the very least, the complaints indicate a lack
of confidence in the bulk power market and the ability of market participants
to rely on transmission access, thus harming the liquidity of the market.

TLRs are the most important transmission issue in the Midwest, with an
"enormous" increase in 2000.  The region showed a decline in peak load from
1999 to 2000 and a growth in new generation since the 1998 price spikes.
Even though there was an increase in generation and mild weather with
virtually no price spikes, TLRs climbed to record numbers.  The TLRs were
highly concentrated:  only 5 flowgates account for 41% of ECAR TLRs and
another 5 flowgates in MAIN account for 42% in that region.  Notably, even
though the NERC procedures for Level 3 TLRs mandate transaction curtailment,
78 of the 191 TLRs in the Midwest do not show any curtailment amount.  The
total amount of relief that these curtailments are intended to produce are
not posted.  Staff notes that TLR rules are established by NERC, whose
procedures are voluntary and not enforced by penalties.  While the Commission
has required certain NERC standards and procedures to be placed in Open
Access Transmission Tariffs ("OATT") where the Commission has the power to
enforce provisions under the Federal Power Act, in practice the Commission
has generally deferred to NERC on transmission reliability questions,
including the propriety of TLRs.

TLRs inhibit optimal functioning of the transmission system and market
because load is not served by the least cost supplier.  TLR procedure is an
inefficient instrument in mitigating constraints -- curtailment by fiat.  In
addition, the NERC IDC can result in inappropriate curtailments or increased
loading on the affected flowgate.  The impact could be mitigated by one
control area per RTO.

Staff notes that the Midwest state commissions did not petition FERC for
price caps following the 1998 price spikes.  Some market participants believe
that the absence of price spikes is the single reason that NUG construction
increased in the Midwest.

Market participants must keep track of, and follow, a plethora of information
in order to make energy deals, submit reservations and provide schedules for
service.  Staff received many complaints about barriers to transmission
access, including TLR curtailments and a lack of standardized information and
protocols, particularly for ATC and interconnection requests, and
discriminatory conduct.  Unbelievably, key data was unavailable to Staff,
such coincident peak load data, system-wide snap shots for days when TLRs
were called, and import/export data.  This lack of data creates a market
inefficiency, because neither market participants nor regulators can fully
analyze market conditions in real time.  As such, the market is risk adverse,
eschewing long-term deals for short-term transactions.  Staff also noted that
because the Security Coordinators often work for the IOU, there is a mixed
incentive to enforce reliability on the grid and maximize profit for the
IOU.  (Staff cites Richard Tabors' paper, "Transmission Markets, Stretching
the Rules for Fun and Profit.")

Staff cites the lack of information on OASIS or on the NERC web site,
particularly about real time TLRs and curtailments.  Examples were provided
to Staff of transmission refusals when there were no TLRs posted and improper
implementation of TLRs causing substantial financial loss.

The currently proposed Midwest RTOs may mitigate some problems; however, all
three retain existing control areas with the favortism for generation and
native load.  These incentives will continue to remain until the RTO
exercises complete autonomy over transmission control and security
coordinator functions.  Staff notes that the Midwest is a balkanized region
of 61 control areas with no uniform method for calculating ATC and CBM.  The
result is that ATCs can be different on 2 different sides of an interface.
Staff notes examples in inaccurate ATCs and states that Staff's own ATC audit
this summer was consistent with market participant complaints.  Staff is
weighing follow-up options.  The result of these problems is a lack of
liquidity.

Staff next noted the problems with unfiled "business practices," especially
on the next hour market.  Staff's audit of OASIS sites revealed several areas
of non-compliance.

Information transparency is necessary for a market to function efficiently,
with equal and timely access to data, including ATC, CBM, TRM, and load flow
input data.  TPs have incentives to resist efforts to make this information
transparent because of native load.  This incentive will still exist under
RTOs if utilities are allowed to calculate their own ATC.  ***  "As a
consequence, the Commission may wish to eliminate the native load exemption
and have all transactions under the same tariff."  ***  The Commission could
benefit by having access to existing transmission data and should require the
TPs to retain data, including current real-time network status.

Interconnection Issues:  IPPs need to be compensated for VAR support.  Also,
Staff cites a number of Hotline complaints about TPs seeking large deposits
or failing to complete System Impact Studies timely.  One solution is to have
the RTO handle this function to eliminate the disincentive the utilities have
against IPPs.  The current practice of requiring IPPs to deal with a wide
variety of procedures inhibits the free flow of transactions within the
region.

Network service has inherent advantages over point-to-point, citing the
Entergy source and sink order.  The Commission has relied on "passively"
receiving informal and formal complaints to determine if discriminatory
behavior has occurred rather than actively canvassing market participants.
While Staff cannot conclude that discriminatory practices are widespread,
there is evidence of discriminatory instances.

Southeast:  The traditional vertically integrated utility ("VIU") model has
largely persisted in the SE.  This continued control has vastly reduced the
economic incentives to facilitate IPP activities.  In many cases, the VIUs
have dampened IPP involvement without violating any Commission regulation due
to the inherent flexibility of the current rules.

Staff cites examples of delays in performing system impact studies,
transmission hoarding in the name of serving native load growth and
manipulation of ATC.  TPs have shown little inclination to improve the
transmission system and use many TLRs.

There is also a lack of market information that has stymied the development
of markets in the SE.  ATCs change constantly that leads to uncertainty and
there is no clearinghouse for electric power prices.

TVA, despite having taken steps to participate in reformed markets, has acted
as a bulwark against the development of competitive energy markets in the
SE.  This is significant because of TVA's size and location.  IPPs have
reported TVA's discouragement of siting in TVA through excessive time to
perform studies, excessive fees, and rejection of requests to perform
interconnection studies.

In addition, Staff cites the Florida Sup. Ct. decision against merchant
plants as significantly impeding the competitive market in Florida.

Staff discusses the significant flow of power from the Midwest to the SE this
summer.  Much of this resulted from the import of cheaper coal power, than
the use of gas fired peakers due to higher gas prices.  Peak prices were
radically lower this summer because utilities appear to have been better
prepared for peak events through the use of forward contracts, increased
generation capacity on line and reduced number of forced outages.

SE utilities reported that they have not used market-based rates to
extensively increase sales.  (Less used than in the midwest.)

The SE region lacks information, which has retarded the Staff's efforts to
discern the truth about the numerous complaints about transmission in the SE
(including ATC and TLRs).  Market participants seem to have less confidence
in the SE market than in any other market region.  This appears to be
justified based on Staff's investigations.  This lack of confidence
discourages investment and participation in the markets.  Staff concludes
that the Commission may need to be more prescriptive in terms of how
transmission is allocated in the SE RTOs, since there are market concerns
that the incumbents will continue to dominate operations.  The investigation
found numerous problems in bad ATCs and TTCs and poor OASIS postings.  In
addition, several OASIS audit logs actually erased historical data.  Staff
thinks that additional affiliate transaction information should be posted.
Staff could not obtain summer demand data and the Commission's lack of
jurisdiction over TVA made it difficult to obtain transmission access
information.

The Staff investigation revealed unclear interconnection procedures and lack
of adherence to schedules and arbitrary cost estimates and deposits.  In
addition, the TPs have reserved a huge amount of network transmission
capacity, much of it reserved shortly after the IPP approached the TP to
interconnect.  Staff cites the recent Skygen order in which Southern denied
Skygen's request for transmission stating that the only option was the
construction of an 80 mile 500 kv line that would take 8 years to complete.
Staff solutions include allowing network requests by IPPs and limiting
self-build capacity in the incumbent's territory.

ATC variations are a big problem in the SE.  SERC coordination of a
standardized ATC is a long process and may not be resolved soon without
direction from the Commission.  An improved method and improved communication
are needed.

The SE experienced a 354% increase in TLRs this summer.  This increase raises
the issue of whether curtailment has become an impediment to the competitive
operation of the market in the SE.  Staff cites information provided by
Charles Y. that an Ameren TLR was not implemented according to NERC
criteria.  Staff also wonders if transmission is being oversold since TPs do
not generally refund transmission revenues when TLRs are implemented.  RTOs
must have a broad geographic area to internalize much of the constraints.  In
addition, RTOs will adopt pricing mechanisms that obviate recourse to TLRs.
However, if control areas are retained, VIUs will retain mixed incentives.

*** As noted in the Midwest report, the manner in which load is calculated
weighs heavily on the value of this information.  This is an issue that the
formation of RTOs may not resolve.  Eliminating native load exceptions -- ie,
treating all load equally -- and placing all transactions under the same
tariff may be an option that provides the right incentives for the provision
of transparent and standardized information.

Finally, Staff describes specific problems with TVA and FP&L, TVA is a
"problem area" for the Eastern Interconnect grid.  TVA is a transmission
bottleneck due to the many TLRs called this summer.  The current federal law
and lack of Commission jurisdiction are impediments to the development of
deep and robust power markets in this area.  TVA simply has no strong
incentive to provide effective and efficient transmission service.  In
addition, the Commission does not have full information on TVA.  Staff lists
a number of complaints against TVA, including unjustifiably increasing the
tag deadline and allowing TVA Marketing, but not others, to sink and park
power.  Staff concludes that recent proposals by TVA to enhance the
development of markets and its system do not appear to have great potential.

A Staff audit of FP&L revealed violations of standards of conduct, including
confidential information on FP&L's transmission system (including interchange
information for other entities) posted on EMS systems that were available to
FPL's merchant function.  Staff's report found that FP&L does not have an
established procedure for review of EMS to ensure that information is not
displayed in error.  It is "up to individual Managers discretion."  ((FRCC
web site report dated 9/8/00)).  Violations such as these undermine
competition.

The reports are attached below.

 - southeast.pdf
 - midwest.pdf


Howdy:

Just between thee and me, I think this note gets to some of the challenges we
faced and discussed as part of our "group gropes" over the last several
months.  With Sue coming back on Tuesday, and in the spirt of our gropes, it
might be useful to discuss as a group prior to charging ahead.  May even
result in the same outcome on how to proceed, but a little "process" on the
front end may go a long way toward keeping things on an even keel.  Anywho,
just my two cents.  Hope your meetings in Salem went well.

Best,
Jeff

Mona L Petrochko
08/30/2000 05:51 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, West GA, Mary
Hain@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Comments on Wholesale Issues

Wood, the Assigned Commissioner in the investigation of wholesale electric
markets, has asked for comments on the following questions by Friday,
September 8.  We are an individual party to the case as well as a member of
ARM and WPTF.

This would be a good opportunity to get our version of what is wrong on the
record.  The presentation that Tim and Mary put together for FERC will be
helpful in answering these questions.  I will take a first cut at drafting
response to be circulated by Tuesday of next week.  We can take liberties in
providing responses that go beyond the question asked.

Market Structure:

Are the market conditions currently being experienced (price spikes and suppy
shortages) inevitable under the current market structure?
Do generators and/or scheduling coordinators have market power?
Is there a need to mitigate such market power?
Which market participants or other entities are responsible for reliability
planning?
Do California regulatory agencies have adequate jurisdiction to ensure
reasonable prices and reliable service?
Do the structures and governance of the Cal ISO and PX adequately support the
goals of providing reasonably priced and reliable service?

Market Rules:

Are there rules which allow or encourage unacceptable market outcomes?
What roles, if any, do underscheduling in forward markets, out of state
transfers, uniform PX auction prices and ISO real-time and out-of-market
purchases play in the outcomes being experienced?

Behavior of Market Participants:

What is working and not working in terms of price, reliability, information
exchange, resource distribution, equity, service quality, and types of
planned generation?


Further to my converation with Mark Taylor, I understand that there are some
potentially substantial changes to the Australian GTC in the works.

Please advise as to when the redrafted GTC is expected to be available. If
necessary, we will come into the office this weekend to upload it.

Thanks,

Dave


Forgot Saguoro (sold it last week)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:36 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Still got some bits to fill in

but here is where we got to.

 << File: ENA_Oct'01.ppt >>


The pictures came through the second time.  Hey-did you get my gift basket.


I don't think I ever saw the breakout on the access area since we didn't get
this via capacity release.

I'm here for you - NOT.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Garza                           11/06/2000 11:53 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VNG

Hey there!!!!

I need your help.

Can you tell me the distribution of VNG's TX Eastern contract?

How much is from WLA, ELA, STX, ect.  I know we no longer have the capacity
past Oct., but I still need the breakout.

Thanks,
Maria
x3-7019


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
09:03 AM ---------------------------

"Ram Tackett" <rtackett@abacustech.net> on 08/12/2000 05:12:15 PM
Please respond to rtackett@abacustech.net
To: "Geoff and Susan Gayle and Family \(E-mail\)" <stormgale@msn.com>
cc: "Adam and Carla Venette and Family \(E-mail\)" <venette@flash.net>, Daren
J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Garrett's Birthday Pictures

Geoff,

Thanks for the pictures. Looks like the kids had a great time!

I hope you don't mind, but I've taken liberty to turn them into a web photo
album at http://24.27.98.30/pictures/08-05_Garrett_Gayle_Bday. If you want
to pass this web site address along to other folks, feel free.

If you want a CD copy of this web site, give me a yell.

Thanks,

Ram Tackett,  (mailto:rtackett@abacustech.net)
Owner, Abacus Technologies
17611 Loring Lane, Spring, TX 77388-5746
(281)651-7106;Fax(281)528-8636  Web: http://www.abacustech.net

 - Ram Tackett (E-mail).vcf


Good morning Professor Ordonez:

Vince would like to bring Ernesto and Carlos in for a preliminary interview.
Vince and Stinson are available on Tuesday, December 5 or Wednesday,
December 6.

Should I contact them personally, or will you arrange the interviews?

I will need to know the times they are available on these days and I will also
need copies of their resumes.

If you need any information, please call me at 713/853-5290.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
11/27/2000 10:47 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Greetings

Shirley,

Please, invite them for a preliminary interview,
Stinson, Zimin, Paulo and myself.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/27/2000 10:15:51 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Greetings

Dear Vince,

I am sorry for the dely in answering. These are their phone numbers:

Ernesto Hernandez:  (713) 532-0573
Carlos Gorrichategui: (713) 668-0408.

The best way to get a hold of them at this point would be through
me. I would pass along the information and then they can contact you.

Cheers,

Carlos

At 12:50 PM 11/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Carlos,
>
>I need their phone numbers.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 11:45:45 AM
>
>To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Greetings
>
>
>Vince,
>
>I gave you both their academic reports from here and Mexico and Panama.
>This
>information I believe also contain some personal info. Would you need more?
>One of them was a bit nervous about the formality of turning in an actual
>resume...
>
>Please let me know whether the academic info is not enough.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>At 10:41 AM 11/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>Carlos,
>>
>>Please, forward their resumes to us and we shall set up an interview for
>>them.
>>
>>Vince
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 09:30:08 AM
>>
>>To:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
>>cc:   vkamins@enron.com
>>Subject:  Re: Greetings
>>
>>
>>Dear Vincent and Stinson,
>>
>>Both my students would love to come visit you guys for an informal
>>visit in the near future. Please let me know well ahead of time
>>when they can come. If possible, see to it that their parking expenses
>>be paid when they do come.
>>
>>
>>I'll be in touch with you all over the next months about this and
>>a possible postdoctoral/trainee agreement (World Lab.).
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 80052 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Here is what I said.

Jim


I believe this to be the latest draft of the PSCO change order.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:11
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 05:36 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

Kay, Ben & Chris:

Attached is the latest draft of Change Order #2 for your review & input:

Kathy


Please be advised that the following network shares have been moved to a new
server:

Act
BDEV
Bids
Construction
ExpProjectDocs
FacilTrk
MIS
O&M
ProjManagement
Scans
ServiceRpt
SiteReports

To connect to the new share locations, double-click on network neighborhood
and find the machine called CABFLA06PSGE.  Double-click on the machine.  All
of the shares will be listed.  Right-click on the share you wish to map and
select Map network drive.  Select the drive letter you wish to use and click
on OK.

I apologize for the late notice.  I was not aware that these shares were
moved until this morning.  I will send out an update on data moves as soon as
I am aware of them, hopefully minimizing your inconvenience.

Thanks.

--D


Donald,

Back in October we had the gas received by HPL at the above meter moved to
Strangers Gas pending a call from Coastal to renegotiate a contract for Sept
2000 gas.  Since volumes can no longer be allocated to stranger,s gas it has
been placed on an MJG deal which was the only valid deal available for Sept
2000.
I assume Coastal has not contacted Brian as of yet.  Is it possible to have a
deal created for Coastal with a price of zero?  I know that we definitely do
not want to pay MJG for this gas, but as long as the volume is sitting on
their deal there is a possibility that someone may inadvertently send the
payment out.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Nick
x36454
---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron on 01/29/2001
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Donald P Reinhardt@ECT
10/27/2000 11:09 AM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M
Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Coastal Ctr# 96008903 Meter 0984179 Sit#135714

Having discussed the matter with Brian Riley, HPL has no intention of
contacting Coastal to negotiate any type of deal affecting the gas received
in September at at Meter 4179.  It was Brian's opinion that the gas should be
considered Strangers gas since HPL has no contract or price.   It is
suggested that Nick Moshou contact his counterpart at Coastal, relaying this
information and suggesting Coastal's trader contract Brian Riley.

Donald

Mary Poorman@ENRON
10/27/2000 10:05 AM
To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Ctr# 96008903 Meter 0984179 Sit#135714

Nick,

I understand that they terminated their agreement.  However, I don't feel
that we can confiscate their production.  We need to either pay them for the
gas, or cut a deal to redeliver a like volume to them at another meter.
Given the decrease in prices from September to current and prompt month, I
would guess that they want to be paid.  We won't know that until we call
them.  I don't know where the responsibility lies as far as calling to
explain to them that we took delivery of their gas until the meter was
shut-in.

Please let me know if I can do anything further to assist.

Mary


---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
01:58 PM ---------------------------

John Griffith
03/30/2001 02:55 PM
To: Jeremy Wong/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: Skew Project

I uploaded the skew vols with Margie's table.  She is going to check to see
if it hit the database.  Please mark the book (production) with this info.
Please call me at x.36247 if you have any questions.  Thanks.

John


Please refer to agenda below for today's conference call.  A spreadsheet has
been attached detailing
assets that are currently under review, along with persons responsible for
assisting in this review
process.

The Regulatory Risk Assessment Working Group Agenda:

1.     Brief recap of meetings held in Canada and England

     - Review the trends discovered from the first phase of risk assessment,
primarily the lack of a standardized due diligence process for Enron's
businesses

2.     Focus on development of formal due diligence procedures for various
business segments - i.e. Generation, Distribution, possibly transmission and
retail

     - Formation of  teams to tackle each of the segments separately

3.     Wrap up the second phase of regulatory risk assessment

Conference Room EB-4741 has been  reserved for this call.


for Kevin Johnson, Wayne Chrebet, and Bill Schroeder?


We should make it by 6:45 plus or minus 30 minutes


Here's my stab at it:

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>
03/02/2001 12:56 PM

Please respond to "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>
To: <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Constructive plan

Here's the document we discussed.? It is one of our  approved fact sheets.
?
If you have any trouble with the file, let me  know.
?
Ken
 - Constructive plan.doc


I am sure that all of you have seen the notice sent this morning from
Charlene Jackson, Managing Director of the Associate and Analyst Program.  I
wanted to follow up with a note to all campus team MDs and IT team members to
clarify any confusion surrounding Super Saturdays and technologist recruiting
for the Global Technology Track.   Although the Global Technology Track is
part of the Analyst and Associate Program - we will NOT be participating in
the Super Saturday events listed below.  Technologist candidates will be
brought into the office for a FRIDAY office visit.

Super Saturdays were first initiated for commercial Analyst and Associate
recruiting because many Enron representatives were not able to leave their
desks while the market was open during the workday.  Bringing candidates in
during the weekend works well in this situation because Enron representatives
can fully participate in the office visit and candidates can still see the
office.

However, many technology VPs have suggested that seeing Enron "alive and in
action" during the week would be a high selling point for technologist
candidates.    Therefore, we have opted to have Technology office visits on
Fridays.  The first three office visits are listed below:

November 10th
December 1st
January 19th

We will be sending out more detailed information on how you can become more
involved with technology office visits.  I apologize for any confusion.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. 3-3589.

Thanks,
Ashley
---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/25/2000
08:56 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Charlene Jackson                           10/24/2000 09:20 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Employees North America
cc:

Subject: Super Saturday Changes

The recruiting season has officially begun.  The first Super Saturday weekend
is the weekend of October 27th and 28th.  We have undergone a rigorous
interview process on campus, which will allow us to focus on &selling8
candidates that are invited to Houston for Super Saturday.  Students will
arrive on Friday afternoon and will depart on Sunday morning.  We have
activities planned for the entire weekend.  The goal is to implement a Super
Saturday process that allows for consistent and meaningful hiring decisions
while also allowing the candidates exposure to a greater number of Enron
employees.  To that end, we have made the following changes:
Friday Evening Dinner.    The dinners will be held at the same restaurant.
We will provide transportation for all candidates.  We will continue to have
small tables of six individuals that will include two (2) Enron employees and
four (4) students.  There will be a group cocktail hour at the restaurant
before the dinner.  This will enable the Enron employees to meet and evaluate
more students.  It will also give the students broader exposure to Enron
employees.
Saturday Interviews.   Interviewers will receive their interview packages
(schedules and resumes) at breakfast on Saturday morning. This will
facilitate last minute cancellations of interviewers and/or candidates.  We
have allowed time to review resumes before the interview process. To
facilitate the completion of the evaluation form on each student, the
interviewers will remain in an assigned interview room and the students will
rotate.
In prior years, the interviewers have interviewed eight (8) candidates.
Interviewers will now interview only five (5) candidates.  The remainder of
the time will be spent in the decision-making meeting. It is essential that
all interviewers attend the decision-making meeting and that all evaluation
forms are completed and input prior to the meeting.
Decision-Making Meeting.   Rather than asking the interviewers to return on
Monday afternoon, we will hold the decision-making meeting on Saturday
following the interviews and lunch.  The meetings are scheduled from 1:30 PM
to 3:30 PM and will be facilitated by members of Enron,s executive management
team.  Dave Delainey will facilitate the October 28 meeting.  Kevin Hannon,
Jeff Shankman, John Lavorato, Rick Causey and Dan Leff will facilitate
subsequent meetings.
Need for interviewers.  There has been a tremendous response to the call for
dinner participants; however, we are still in need of interviewers for each
of the Super Saturdays.  Please respond with your willingness to interview
at:  http://axis.enron.com/notice/ssinvite.asp
(When selecting dates please avoid selecting to interview candidates who
attend the schools for which you are a team member).
We thank you in advance for your participation and support of the program.


Dan,

Thanks for all your help on the Nicaragua contracts. I appreciate you
watching EFI's and my back.

Doug


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"SHIELDS, TERRY K" <tshield@entergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	McIlvoy, Karen D.
Subject:	FW: Varibus Outstanding Invoices

Karen, would you please forward these to Susan?  They keep coming back as
undeliverable.
Thanks,
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: SHIELDS, TERRY K
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:29 PM
To: 'susan.w.pereira@enron.con'
Subject: FW: Varibus Outstanding Invoices

Susan,
Attathed are the outstanding invoices

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	TAYLOR, PHILIP R
> Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 1:49 PM
> To:	BRODEUR, MARK M; SOBCZAK, GARY J; SHIELDS, TERRY K
> Cc:	MCCLOSKEY, MARGARET
> Subject:	Varibus Outstanding Invoices
>
>
>
> 	Terry-----LGS
>
>
> 		 <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>
> <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>
>
> 			 <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>
> <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>  <<LAGASMAR.xls>>
>
>
> 		 <<LAGASMAR.xls>>
>
>
> 	Terry....	Reliant
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 	Terry.......Enron
>
>
> 				 <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>
>
> 				 <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>
>
>
> 				 <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>  <<ENRON.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
> 	Mark......Koch Energy
>
>
> 	Mark....	Pancanadian
>
>
>
>
> 	Mark....	AIM
>
>
>
>
>
> 	Mark....SDS
>
>
>
>
> 	Mark....Sempra
>
>
>
>
> 	Gary.......Patten
>
>
>
> 				 <<Patten.xls>>  <<ENRON.xls>>
>
>
> 	Thanks........Phil
>
> 	576-4152
>

 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - LAGASMAR.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - ENRON.xls
 - Patten.xls
 - ENRON.xls


Best Buy Co., Inc. Promotes Vice President; New VP of Property
Development Named

********************************
WATCH A PRO TRADE IN REAL TIME

AmericaInvest.com chief technical analyst Harry Boxer
has averaged returns of 2.5% PER DAY in the last 30 days.

See what Harry's trading tick by tick in his real-time
'Technical Trading Diary.'  Beat the bear market with
with both long and short trading ideas.

Sign up for our FREE 15-day trial at
http://216.133.228.197/harry/harryorderpage2.asp?MID=50009

********************************

View complete article at: http://news.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=BBY&article=51032560

BEST BUY CO INC  53.890

MINNEAPOLIS, May 31, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Best Buy Co., Inc., (NYSE:BBY) the
nation's largest consumer electronics retailer, today announced that Hank Dawson
has been promoted to Vice President of Property Development for the Best Buy. In
his new position, Dawson will be responsible for the du

Other Companies Involved:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

? Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


Please plan to attend the relocated meeting to discuss the supply of gas to
Ponderosa Energy (Conhusker) on Thursday July 13 from 3:00 to 4:00 in
conference room 30C2. Call John Griffith @ ext. 36247 with questions.


Hola Susana:

Que tal?  Llegue tarde anoche de una linda visita a lo de mi hermana en
Boston.  Sin embargo, recibi muy malas noticias en cuanto a mi prima Lori.
El viernes pasado se encontraron 2 tumors en el cerebro.  Su hermano, Tommy,
ya estaba en St. Martin y volvio ayer a Florida.  Lori llega hoy.  Manana
tiene cita con el oncologo.  Como el proposito del viaje fue juntarme con
ella, no tengo ganas de irme solo.

Bueno, te llamo esta semana y puede ser que te vea mas tarde en el Met como
juego con Herve a las 6.  un beso, G.

>From: Susan.Scott@enron.com
>To: "william thursland" <wmthursland@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: livin' la semana loca
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:31:20 -0600
>
>
>Guilli, lo siento pero esta semana estoy muy ocupada.  La proxima semana
>seria mejor para almorzar -- el miercoles, jueves o viernes.  Yo pensaba de
>ir a Austin esta fin de semana, pero si no, te llamare para ver si estas
>disponible.  Un beso, S.
>
>
>
>
>"william thursland" <wmthursland@hotmail.com> on 11/07/2000 05:49:54 PM
>
>To:   Susan.Scott@enron.com
>cc:
>
>Subject:  almuerzo
>
>
>Hola Susan,
>
>Que tal?  Yo podria almorzar el viernes si te conviene.  Avisame.  Caio, B
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Kim,

Can you contact Mikie Rath regarding my 401K plan. I haven't received
anything from Northern Trust and would like to get set up. I would like begin
contributing as soon as possible.

Thanx,

Chris

(PS The way it was explained to me the $10 500 / annum contribution limit is
only for personal contributions and does not include company matching, is
this correct?)


Clayton,

Can we provide this spreadsheet to Sarabeth?

vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

Sarabeth Smith@ENRON
03/29/2000 02:23 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Status of Pipeline Construction Projects Information

Vince,
A few days ago, you met with John Goodpasture and Kim Watson concerning GPG's
need for strategic gas modeling capabilities.  Unfortunately, I was on
vacation and was unable to attend the meeting, however, I am very much
looking forward to having a tool that will provide assistance to our
development efforts.

Additionally, let me say that we very much appreciate the work of the
Research group and the strength that you and your organization bring to Enron.

It is my understanding from speaking with John and Kim that you will be
contacting us during the first half of April to talk about modeling
capabilities after you have had the opportunity to review the internally
created model that your department has developed.  We look forward to hearing
from you on that issue.

In the meantime, Clayton had mentioned briefly that he receives a
report/spreadsheet/database dump periodically from James Tobin who is with
one of the U.S. Government agencies, which contains information on the
proposed pipeline construction projects in North America.

Would you be willing to have a copy of that spreadsheet forwarded to me as it
becomes available from the government?
Having access to this spreadsheet would save a considerable amount of time
since the information is consolidated all in one place.

Please let me know your thoughts on this request.  Your assistance is greatly
appreciated, as always.

Best regards,
Sarabeth Smith
X37973


This came in this morning, the long awaited Bear Stearns forward.  I haven't
looked at it but will take a look at it shortly after I update some slide for
the Finance Committee.

J
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 09:42 AM
---------------------------

"Snyder, Frank (Exchange)" <fsnyder@bear.com> on 09/22/2000 05:26:12 PM
To: "'jeff.nogid@enron.com'" <jeff.nogid@enron.com>
cc: "Froom, Ilene (Exchange)" <IFROOM@bear.com>
Subject: Forward Draft NY11062 Enron Corporation

Jeff:

The Forward Draft that you have been expecting is attached for your review.
Registration rights language reflecting the most current EITF ruling will be
available in the near term and when ready will be forward to you for review
as well. At least you can begin reviewing the Draft of the proposed
confirmation. We will look forward to hearing your comments at your earliest
convenience.

   <<NY11062 Enron Corp. Forward.doc>>

Have a pleasant weekend,

Frank Snyder
Derivatives Documentation
email: fsnyder@bear.com
phone: 212-272-6841
fax: 212-272-9857

 - NY11062 Enron Corp. Forward.doc

***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Mark,

Please send this to John.

Hollis

Mark Fisher
04/22/2002 07:39 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WR594 Gearbox data

Hollis,

Here is a copy of the data for request 594. There is virtually no formatting.
If this looks OK I'll send it on to John Admire.

Mark


Best of luck.  You've got a tough job.  Guess you'll be working that much
harder now that John Stevens is on his way to San Francisco.

At last week's meeting, a request was made for peak and off peak prices.
I've attached prices that we filed yesterday at FERC as part of its on-going
proceeding of forward contracts.  Few comments:

We'd appreciate it if you could keep the information confidential,
particularly since the information is covered by FERC's confidentiality
provisions.

Since we are not a "generator," we buy and sell in the market, which as you
know is currently very volatile. Consequently, the quotes that we provide
customers change daily to reflect changing market prices.  These prices were
put together and filed yesterday, but you may have heard that prices were
down today.  So quotes we made today were lower.   And quotes we makes
tomorrow will reflect tomorrow's market conditions and will likely be
different from today's.

Because these quotes were assembled yesterday, they are only "indicative."
That is, if someone wanted to buy these products today, we'd have to
recalculate prices, because the quotes established yesterday are no longer
valid (for the reasons I mentioned above).

Hope this helps.  If you have any questions, let me know.

Best,
Jeff


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Special Announcement! This report can now be accessed directly through the
EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow
the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A
dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports
available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a
security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and
password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load
automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or
experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site,
please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose
at x31670.


One of us can.

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/15/2001 04:47 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Dynegy CA

Kathleen:

Please check the previous CA's with Dynegy to determine if they were
unilateral or bilateral.  If they were unilateral then this form looks fine.
If they were bilateral, then we should adopt that format in the CA that we
are preparing to send out to Dynegy.

Kay:  If Kathleen is out of the office tomorrow, can Carlos pull this CA
together?

Fred

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan @ ENRON                           02/14/2001 11:26 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dynegy CA

Kay,

Attached for your review is the revised Dynegy CA (Unilateral in favor of
ENA) which includes ENA providing Dynegy with: (i) information as to the
project sites in areas they are interested; and (ii) discussions regarding
the potential sale of natural gas fired electric generation projects.

Please advise.

Kathleen


Please include the terms of this worksheet within all confirmations until an
ISDA can become executed.

Thanks
Brant


These are the current drafts of the proposed documents relating to the
Intergen transaction.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/19/2000 04:18
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/19/2000 04:13:08 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: InterGen/ENA - GE Turbines & ABB Transformer

Attached are clean and redlined versions of revised drafts of (i) the
Letter Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP relating to CA
Energy Development I, LLC and the GE generator set, and (ii) the Letter
Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP relating to the ABB
transformer.  The Letter Agreement between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP
relating to CA Energy Development II, LLC and the GE generator set will
be in the same form as item (i) above with changes to reflect the proper
LLC.

To expedite matters, these revised drafts are being sent to you before
review by InterGen with the understanding that InterGen may have
additional changes and comments.

In addition to changes necessitated by the substitution of Sweetgum for
Tejas, the letter agreements have been revised to reflect the following
requirements of InterGen:

(i)  The parent guaranty on behalf of Sweetgum Energy LP has been
deleted;

(ii)  A mutual covenant requiring the Parties to use all reasonable
efforts to satisfy the conditions precedent as been added to the end of
Section 3; and

(iii)  A no shop clause on the part of ENA and its affiliates has been
added as  a new Section 17.

The reference to the TRY Ventures International agreement was deleted
from the letter agreement relating to the ABB transformer since it is my
understanding that the ABB transformer was not covered by Coral's
agreement with TRY.  ENA would nevertheless be protected by the general
language of the clause.

Although InterGen is still reviewing these documents for tax and other
concerns, for now the only contemplated changes to the LLC Agreements
and the GE and ABB acknowledgement letters are those needed to reflect
the substitution of Sweetgum for Tejas.

InterGen is still reviewing the Facility Agreement and exhibits
thereto.

I have passed on ENA's suggestion regarding the extension of the
closing date, but have not yet had a response from InterGen.

Doug Pedigo will be tied up tomorrow morning, but Doug and I are
available after lunch for a telephone conference to discuss any comments
you have on the closing.

George


Friday, January 25, 2002    Global Energy Solutions   [IMAGE]   MORE EVENTS  - ADD NEW EVENT  - ADVERTISE  - FREE SYNDICATION      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]   IN THIS ISSUE       [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]       New Listings   Featured Listings        Next Two Weeks   More Information         Look for events labeled "Register Online!" and REGISTER INSTANTLY. "Special Offer!" means a special discounted price for Energy Central Members!     Do you have a colleague that could benefit from the Conference Watch?  If so, please feel free to forward your copy in its entirety.      Featured Listings      Building And Maintaining Customer Relations & Branding Strategies     01/29/02 - 01/30/02  San Diego, CA USA   Presented By: Active Communications International, Inc.   [IMAGE]     Energy Venture Fair II     01/29/02 - 01/30/02  Houston, TX USA   Presented By: Infocast   [IMAGE]     2nd Annual Caribbean Energy     01/31/02 - 02/01/02  Miami, FL USA   Presented By: The Center for Business Intelligence   [IMAGE]     Facility Energy Cost Management     01/31/02 - 02/01/02  New Orleans, LA USA   Presented By: The Center for Business Intelligence   [IMAGE]     2002 Gas Storage Conference     02/06/02 - 02/07/02  Houston, TX USA   Presented By: Ziff Energy Group   [IMAGE]     Fuel Cell Dynamics 2002: Reality, Not Hype     02/06/02 - 02/07/02  New York, NY USA   Presented By: Allied Business Intelligence  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     CERAWeek 2002 - The New Face of Risk: Energy Strategies for a Changed World     02/11/02 - 02/15/02  Houston, TX USA   Presented By: Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA)   [IMAGE]     4th Annual Electric Asset Valuation     02/25/02 - 02/26/02  Houston, TX USA   Presented By: The Center for Business Intelligence   [IMAGE]     DistribuTECH 2002     02/27/02 - 03/01/02  Miami Beach, FL USA   Presented By: Pennwell   [IMAGE]     The Ratemaking Process     02/27/02 - 03/01/02  Atlanta, GA USA   Presented By: Southern Gas Association (SGA)   [IMAGE]     GLOBE 2002 International Conference & Trade Fair on Business and the Environment     03/13/02 - 03/15/02  Vancouver, BC Canada   Presented By: Globe Foundation of Canada  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     New Listings   These listings have been added to the Energy Central service since last week. Click on a title to view the full description in your web browser.       EEO Europe: Energy Trading in the New Economy     02/19/02 - 02/21/02  Amsterdam   [IMAGE]     3rd Annual Multiphase and Wet Gas Forum     02/25/02 - 02/26/02  Houston, TX USA   [IMAGE]     TechAdvantage 2002 Expo     03/08/02 - 03/11/02  Dallas, TX US   [IMAGE]     Recruiting and Retaining Electric Power Professionals     03/14/02 - 03/15/02  Houston, TX USA   [IMAGE]     Electric Power 2002     03/19/02 - 03/21/02  St. Louis, MO USA   [IMAGE]     7th Annual Brazil Energy Conference     03/21/02 - 03/22/02  Miami, FL USA   [IMAGE]     Safety and Security in the Electric Power Industry     03/25/02 - 03/26/02  Houston, TX USA   [IMAGE]     2nd Annual Fuelcell Investor     03/26/02 - 03/27/02  New York, NY USA   [IMAGE]     Advances in Liquefied Natural Gas     04/15/02 - 04/16/02  New Orleans, LA USA   [IMAGE]     Electrical Energy Storage Applications and Technologies Conference     04/15/02 - 04/17/02  San Francisco, CA USA   [IMAGE]     North American Gas Strategies Conference     04/15/02 - 04/16/02  Houston, TX USA   [IMAGE]     Restructuring Transmission Operations     04/22/02 - 04/23/02  Alexandria, VA USA   [IMAGE]     The Edison Electric Institute Annual Convention/Expo     06/02/02 - 06/04/02  Boston, MA USA   [IMAGE]     2nd IASTED International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (EuroPES 2002)     06/25/02 - 06/28/02  Crete Greece   [IMAGE]     North American Gas Strategies Conference     10/28/02 - 10/29/02  Calgary, AL Canada   [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]  Infocast   Please click to visit this sponsor      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE][IMAGE]     Search For:    Name  Description   City  Organizer      Search by Topic: - ALL - Acquisitions Alternative Energy Business Managem... California Crisis Chemical Special... Coal Cogeneration Company Informat... Competition & De... Construction Deregulation Distributed Gene... Distribution Efficiency/Conse... Energy Management Energy Policy Engineering Environmental Financial Fuel Gas Human Resources Industry Structure Insurance Labor Legal Legislation/Regu... Load Shapes Marketing Mergers, Acquisi... New Technologies... Nuclear Oil Operations Outsourcing People Planning Plant Operations Power Marketing Pricing Public Power Rates Renewable Energy Request for Prop... Sales State Technology Telecommunications Transactions & A... Transmission Utility Billing Utility Business Utility E-Commerce Water Weather                               [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  The Energy Central Events Center delivers the most comprehensive listing of conferences, trade shows, seminars and classes relevant to power professionals.     Add New Event Listing   Edit Your Event Listing    Now you can allow Energy Central members to register for your event instantly! For more details, contact the Events Manager at eventsmgr@energycentral.com  or 800-459-2233.  For information on Featured Listings, Banner Advertising or Events Center sponsorships, contact Energy Central Sales at sales@energycentral.com  or 800-459-2233.      [IMAGE]    01/27/02 - 01/30/02  Tailings and mine waste '02  (CO, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/28/02 - 01/29/02  6th Annual Profit from Merchant Plants  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/28/02 - 01/29/02  Investment Opportunities in Spain's Energy Industry  (Spain )   [IMAGE]    01/28/02 - 01/30/02  Validating Utilities  (NY, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 02/01/02  Basic Telephony and Digital Switching  (WI, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/31/02  Basics of Industrial Electricity  (NC, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/30/02  Building And Maintaining Customer Relations & Branding Strategies  (CA, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/30/02  Energy Venture Fair II  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/29/02  It's Only Time and Money  (CO, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/29/02  Natural Gas Basic Training  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/30/02  Successful business strategies for Stadtwerke  (Germany)   [IMAGE]    01/29/02 - 01/29/02  Transmission Executive Forum  (DC, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/30/02 - 01/31/02  Electricity - 101 Seminar  (FL, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/30/02 - 01/30/02  Electricity Basic Training  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/30/02 - 02/01/02  The 2002 National Electrical Code  (FL, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/30/02 - 01/31/02  Transmission Summit 2002: The Impact of New FERC Policies on the Future of the Grid  (DC, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/31/02 - 02/01/02  2nd Annual Caribbean Energy  (FL, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/31/02 - 01/31/02  Energy Risk Management Basic Training  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    01/31/02 - 02/01/02  Facility Energy Cost Management  (LA, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/01/02 - 02/01/02  Advanced Power Trading  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/04/02 - 02/05/02  Cleaner Coal Technology and its commercial implementation  (England)   [IMAGE]    02/04/02 - 02/06/02  Grounding of Electrical Distribution Systems  (FL, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/04/02 - 02/07/02  International Colloquium on Environmentally-Preferred Advanced Power Generation  (CA, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/04/02 - 02/06/02  The Advanced Project Finance Courses  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/05/02 - 02/06/02  Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Planning  (NY, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/05/02 - 02/06/02  SCADA for Petroleum, Oil & Gas, and Water Sectors  (Si, Singapore)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/07/02  2002 Gas Storage Conference  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/08/02  Annual World Conference  (LA, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/07/02  Effective Chemical Procurement Strategies 2002 Conference  (Sh, Singapore)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/07/02  Fuel Cell Dynamics 2002: Reality, Not Hype  (NY, USA)    Register Online!   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/08/02  Fundamentals of Buying and Selling Energy  (CA, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/07/02  Global Expertise 02 - Energy Marketing Conference  (Finland)   [IMAGE]    02/06/02 - 02/07/02  Transmission Expansion and Systems in Transition Conference  (FL, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/07/02 - 02/08/02  Crystallization Operations  (CA, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/07/02 - 02/08/02  Natural Gas - 101 Seminar  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]    02/07/02 - 02/08/02  The Advanced Project Finance Courses  (TX, USA)   [IMAGE]           Energy Central Corporate Sponsors        [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]                [IMAGE]      HOME  | NEWSROOM  | EVENTS  | JOBS  | BUSINESS CENTERS  | DIRECTORIES  | DATA CENTER                Contact  sales@energycentral.com  or (303)782-5510 for information on FEATURING your event on this page. Your conference, seminar, or trade show listing  will be sent to more than 28,000 electric power professionals.       DIRECTIONS, INFORMATION AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE   This supplement to the Energy Central Daily News Service is provided FREE to qualified professionals in the electric power industry.   To  BEGIN receiving the Daily News Service directly, send a message with a subject of 'signup' to   service@energycentral.com .    If you do not wish to receive the Conference Watch, you may cancel your subscription at any time by using one of the three methods below:  Go to http://www.energycentral.com/sections/services/ , click on Email Management, then cancel your subscription. -OR- Reply to this e-mail with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. -OR- Type in your e-mail address here: and click   This supplement to the Energy Central Daily News Service may be redistributed provided it is kept in its entirety.  COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This e-mail newsletter may be re-distributed or reproduced in it's entirety. You may print, forward via e-mail or place this on an internal network with no other requirements.   Copyright ? 1998-2001 by  CyberTech, Inc.    All rights reserved.  Energy Central
 is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.  CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.  Contact: 303-782-5510 or   service@energycentral.com   for information on subscribing/unsubscribing or visit  member services.            [IMAGE]


Steve -

Thanks for the comments.  Here are my responses:

1.  Introductory Paragraph - Section (a) is unacceptable as this places an
administrative burden on Enron that currently does not exist.  Section (b) is
acceptable.

2.  Paragraph 3 - Changes are acceptable.

3.  Paragraph 4 -  Changes in this section are acceptable, however, it is
Enron's strong preference that no indemnity language be included.

4.  Paragraph 5 - Deletion of this provision is unacceptable.

5.  Paragraph 6 - This deletion is fine.

6.  Paragraph 7 - This change is acceptable.

7.  Paragraph 9 - This change is acceptable.

If we still need to discuss the above items, please call me.  Otherwise,
please confirm that we can move forward based upon your changes and Enron's
responses.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Steve Howarth <steve.howarth@bea.com>
	05/01/2001 11:52 AM

		 To: mark.greenberg@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: BEA - ENRON:  NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT/LETTER]

    Mark,

    Sorry, but I misspelled your name when I first sent the following
message this morning.

    Regards,

    Steve

X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <3AEEE8FB.2FBD727D@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 10:48:59 -0600
From: Steve Howarth <steve.howarth@bea.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mark.greenburg@enron.com
CC: Francis Minor <fminor@bea.com>, Mike Thack <mike.thack@bea.com>,  Chuck
Hixson <chuck.hixson@bea.com>
Subject: BEA - ENRON:  NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT/LETTER
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="------------2161B611D0F97A4065FF80B8"

    Mark,

    I have been asked to review the proposed NDA/letter submitted by
Enron to BEA.  Attached are redlined and clean versions of Rev2 of the
letter showing our proposed modifications.  If this Rev2 is acceptable,
I will be pleased to print, sign and return to you the clean version on
BEA's behalf.

    Please feel free to contact me at 720.528.6007 if you have any
questions.

    Regards,

    Steve

 - ENRON  NDA 01 05 01, rev2redline.doc
 - ENRON  NDA 01 05 01, rev2clean.doc
 - steve.howarth.vcf
 - steve.howarth.vcf


Hi Sally,

I am so excited to see you and your family.  For your written
records...we'll in be Austin from Oct 27- Oct 31.  Then, we'll travel to
Houston via the Blue Bell ice cream factory on Nov 1st -- our plane leaves
from Houston on Sat, Nov 4th about 12:30.  Doing something on Friday with
Rebecca and Tyler sounds great -- she's pretty much up for anything.

Let me know what you hear from Mo -- it would be wonderful to see her, too.
Paul and I were starting to worry that something bad had happened in her
life!  It has been so long since we have talked to her.

This week's issue of Business Week has Enron in a list of the top 50
companies who are making the Internet work for them in running their
business  -- the focus for Enron was on the different trading operations,
highlighting trading broadband capacity.  I read BW weekly and Enron seems
to be in there a lot.

Take Care,
Stephanie


I read your e-mail the day of receiving it.  Anyways thanks for the update
.
>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 09/15/00 12:03PM >>>

Brian - I''ll be on vacation next week so if you have any questions, please
call my counterpart in Houston, Christi Nicolay.  Her E-mail address is
above.  Her phone number is (713) 853-7007.

Christi will be pulling together the answer to data request number 8 for
you for just the WSCC.  Christi - Chris is your contact person here to make
sure the numbers are correct.

(See attached file: data request generators&marketers.wpd)

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Brian Harrington"
 pic05537.pcx) <brian.harrington@ferc.fed.us>
               09/15/2000 04:59 AM

To:   <Mary.Hain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Response to FERC Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation

I appreciate your quick response.  Yes, we would like response to question
8 for the WSCC only.  Thank yor the names at Enron Wind.  I will contact
them shortly.  Other team members have reviewed your responses, but I have
not got a l chance to look at them in detail.  I plan to do this today.  As
a resutl, I may have further questions or data needs depending upon what
was provided.  Please call me at 202-208-2493 if you need anything.

>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 09/14/00 08:06PM >>>

Since you only wanted information for the WSCC, do you want the answer to
number 8 to be corrected to only include information for the WSCC?

We don't have any information here about Enron Winds' generators.  I have
forwarded your data requests to the following people at Enron Wind who I
hope will be able to help you:  John Lamb, Michael Payne, and Hap Boyd.
Their addresses are: Michael Payne/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hap
Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, John Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Brian Harrington"
 pic05447.pcx) <brian.harrington@ferc.fed.us>
               09/12/2000 08:17 AM

To:   <chris.stokley@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Response to FERC Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation

Thank you for your timely response to FERC's data request.  To date, I have
received responses to questions 2-8.  The only oustanding items are
responses to question #1 and a portion of #4 (unit identifier).  It is
understood that the responses for #1 will be availalbe after September 15
and the additional information for #4 will be available this week.  We will
look over your responses and call you if clarification or additional
information is necessary.  We will treat as you requested #2, 3, 4, 6, and
8 as Confidential.

You were correct is responding only to the WSCC.  We did not purovidea
separate data requests to Enron Wind.  In not doing so, what information
are we missing from our data requests?  Please e-mail me a response to this
questions.  For any other concerns please continue to use e-mail or contact
me at 202-208-2493.

Thanks!


Ditto Tom.

	Lisa Lees
	12/12/2000 02:36 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: US PurEth OPIS vs LLDPE CMAI

Tana/Karen:

The product long description described below will fall under the new product
type US PurityEthane Fin Spread.  Tom Moran has approved copying the profiles
for the new product type from the following:

US Plastic LLDPE Financial Swap

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, December 12.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:56 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           12/11/2000 05:29 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW ENRONONLINE PRODUCT - PLEASE APPROVE

Your review and approval of the following two product type in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail).

Traders: Lee Jackson and Alan Engberg

US PurEth OPIS   vs LLDPE CMAI           Jan01           c/LB

A US Purity Ethane financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.,
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in
respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period is the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 Jan 2001. The Termination Date is
31 Jan 2001.
The Index for a month shall be the difference between
(i) the arithmetic average of the high and low Cents/Pound prices of Linear
Low Density Polyethylene - Butene film grade published under the headings
"North America Product Prices for (DATE): LLDPE Domestic" in the month-end
issue of Chemical Market Associates, Inc.'s Monomers Market Report effective
for such month, and
(ii) the average of the prices for each day in the Determination Period,
where the price for each day shall be the 'Avg' price for Purity Ethane
published in the table entitled 'Mont Belvieu Spot Gas Liquids Prices' under
the heading 'Purity Ethane:  Any Current Month' in the issue of Oil Price
Information Service ('OPIS') that reports prices effective for such
Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be pounds.

==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano - Kevin Meredith
                   x35491           x58986                  x39555