Mike,
   This is Nick Monteleone, old baseball buddy.  I spoke with you when yall came to LSU for the information session and reception at Mike Anderson's.  Hopefully you remember my situation, so I won't get into all those details.  I thought I would send you a copy of my resume.  Maybe you could get it to a recuiter or someone with the decision making power.  That's all.  I just need an upper hand instead of using all this database resume submission.  Don't go through a lot of trouble at all, just maybe hand it to someone that makes the decisions.  And if you can't that is fine too.  I just wanted to give it a shot.  Thank you for the assistance Mike.  Drop me an email from time to time and let me know how things are going.  Bye Mike.
    Sincerely,
           NICK MONTELEONE
           504-245-5155


Here's two more to add.  I suggest you put our outside counsel last on the
list.  There are two firms: Kilpatrick, Stockton and Bracewell & Patterson.
I would put Bracewell before Kilpatrick.

Thanks bunches.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 09:49
AM ---------------------------

"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com> on 08/29/2000 09:40:56 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO contact list

Kay--here's my info, although you may already have this.

Nancy A. Wodka
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W.  Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20006
nwodka@bracepatt.com
ph--202/828-5862
fax--202/857-2132
cell--202/255-9688
home--703/391-9049

Please add Gene Ann Herrin:

Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002
ph--713/221-1565
fax--713/222-3227
gaherrin@bracepatt.com
cell--281/381-9907
home--713/960-8306

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 08/29/00 10:01AM >>>
I'm going to have an updated contact list prepared.  Please email me with
your telephone, location, email address, and cell phone number, if desired.

Please let me know who should be added to this list.

If you are receiving this vis a cc, I have your information.

Thanks,

Kay


Can you please approve the following memo?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Schoppe, Tammie; Brooks, Loretta
Subject:	Gas Trading Move November 9

John has asked for a communication to go out to the gas team about the move this weekend.  Ina Rangel has been communicating with the gas team already on most of these items.

Here is a draft, please have John or Louise "bless this" before sending out.  If you already have a distribution list that includes power, it probably won't hurt for everyone to receive.

As you are all aware, the ENA gas organization will be relocating to Enron Center South this weekend.

The new facility will be available to you at 5:00 am on Monday November 12.  Weather traders will be expected earlier and arrival time has been coordinated separately with the IT support team.  We would like for all traders to be at their new desks at least one hour earlier than usual to ensure that all applications are operating correctly prior to the start of business.

There will be members of the IT, telephony, and churn team on hand upon your arrival to assist with any problems you may encounter. They will be wearing brightly colored vests to be easily recognizable.

Thanks in advance for helping make this a smooth transition to an exciting new work environment.

John and Louise


This looks great.  Do you need me for either of those two dates?

How was dinner last night?   Sorry that I couldn't stay, but I know that the
students were in good hands.  Who else attended from Enron?  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 05:32 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline
Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: OU Scholarships

Mike and Sally:

I have been in contact with Ted Jacobs and have volunteered $1500 in
scholarship funds to be awarded by Enron this spring.  By volunteering this
money, we are now able to attend scholarship interviews on Tuesday, March 6
on campus.  This will provide us with the opportunity to target candidates
for next fall and lay the groundwork for a more competitive future.

After we have identified our scholarship recipients, we are invited to
present our awards at the Scholarship Awards Banquet on Friday, April 20.

Ted will (if he has not already) approach you, Mike, to see if you are
interested in playing a role at this event.   If you are available to attend,
please let me know.  I plan to have at least 2 Enron representatives at the
event.

I just wanted to give each of you these details to keep you fully informed of
our efforts on campus.  If you have any questions or suggestions, please let
me know.

Thank you,

lexi
3-4585


Gary thinks that we will not have any problems with this.

D

Edward D Gottlob
11/21/2000 11:12 AM
To: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerard Krenek/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Are we going to have some quality problems with this gas?  EDG

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerard Krenek/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Well- I have officially NOT heard from Hilcorp after numerous voice and email
messages.  Please plan to have the gas rerouted back down the valley line for
the Dec 1 forward.  Call if you have any questions-

Daren J Farmer
11/21/2000 10:08 AM
To: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Thanks for the info.  I appreciated the call the other day.  It really helps
me out to recieve info early like that.

D

	From:  Mary Jo Johnson                           11/20/2000 03:38 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A
Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HILCORP old ocean volume

According to Gary Hanks, we would like to have the gas on the valley line
anyway
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
03:26 PM ---------------------------
To: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Producer service group?

I can not believe you are sending emails form Hawaii!!!!  You are crazy.  I
took care of Camden for the month-
It is now 330 and Hilcorp has not responded.  I spoke with Jerry Bubert
several times today- emailed Mike LAnnou and left messages, and had him
paged, and copied Hildebrand (the president).  If we don't hear by 4pm, we
are supposed to bypass the gas...........


The FBI has uncorroborated evidence of possible terrorist attacks against the United States.  Reportedly, unspecified groups are targeting suspension bridges on the West Coast beginning Friday, Nov. 2 and continuing through Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001.

No further information about this alleged attack is known at this time.  The FBI is attempting to verify the validity of this report.  In the meantime, California officials are increasing security at the state's suspension bridges, and the National Guard has been authorized to assign troops to protect the bridges.

We shared this information with our West Coast employees earlier in the day.  In the current circumstances, we are likely to see these bulletins fairly frequently.  We don't want to alarm you, but we do want to keep you informed, so we will continue to disseminate this information.


Thanks I so much appreciate the support.  Actually I just got back from LA
today so sorry I didnt write back.  My father passed away a couple weeks ago
and I have been down there taking care of everything for my sister.  It has
been a rough month.  I will write back later in the week or maybe call you or
something.  How is everything with you?


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 08:02
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 08/02/2000 06:41:29 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: daily crude & nat gas charts and nat gas strip matrix 8/2

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

Mike Heffner will be on vacation the rest of this week. No charts until
Monday.

(See attached file: Stripmatrix.pdf)(See attached file: ngas.pdf)(See
attached file: crude.pdf)
 - Stripmatrix.pdf
 - ngas.pdf
 - crude.pdf


Kay, I will be working late tonight on a turbine proposal to Allegheny four MH1 501F turbines.  Ron Tapscott and John Schwartzenburg wanted to structure it somewhat off the NorthWestern Generation transaction this past April.  I have a copy of the April 26th Letter Agreement but have some questions.  It is possible that the proposed deal might not be as complex as the one you worked on.  If you could call me tonight or perhaps early tomorrow morning I would appreciate it.
W-713-345-2520.

I am working with Rose on this also.
Thanks

Randy
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pais, Randy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Tapscott, Ron
Cc:	Schwartzenburg, John
Subject:	FW: Letter Agreement re MHI turbine sale

Ron,

Thanks for the information. Will discuss with Kay.

I need to talk with you to find out more details of the deal for example what you are proposing to send, when do you need the document (I think you mentioned tomorrow) (Are you thinking of an LOI to be included as part of a bid package), who are the parties (Can't tell from your 12 Nov memo), when would closing be.  Does Enron Brazil Power Holdings own them outright now or they held by some other entity where we would be acting as agent for the sale.  If so do you know who  would we be assigning Enron's Brazil's interest in the MHI turbines,  The letter that Chris forwarded dated September 14th between Enron Power Brazil was attached.  Who prepared this. Is this the Nepco letter you referred to.  Will give you a call.

To meet your time schedule, I do need to know more specifics on what you intend to accomplish.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwartzenburg, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Pais, Randy
Cc:	Mann, Kay; Tapscott, Ron
Subject:	FW: Letter Agreement re MHI turbine sale

Randy, please call me or Ron about the attached. teh goal will be to turn dox tomorrow to move the sale along.

Kay -  word is you worked the Northwestern deal. Ron wants to borrow from the Northwestern deal as this sale wil need to be done as a sale of the entity, not just the contract. Apparently, there is more of a  customs issue involved here than a consent issue, but some of the mechanics will be similar. Could you talk to Randy about the Northwestern sale and get him connected up with the dox? thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tapscott, Ron
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Schwartzenburg, John
Subject:	FW: Letter Agreement

 this is the letter agreement for the sale of the mhi equipment at port of export.  the letter agreement below is for the northwestern deal which embodies the sale of interest in company as part of the structure.

thanks, ron.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Booth, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:27 PM
To:	Tapscott, Ron
Subject:	Letter Agreement


Samantha:  You're doing a great job with Lotus Notes!!  I'm impressed.  Just
a few thoughts about some agreements which have fallen through the cracks (on
record keeping):

(1)  ABN AMRO in Australia (futures) -  Jason is working on this
(2)  Bank One (give-up agreement)  -  Mary is now working on this


Start Date: 12/20/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122020.txt


> Jeff:
> Sorry to bug you but could you fax to me the letters Enron has sent to
> the CPUC (or UDCs if they are also relevant).  Paul Clanon's office has
> called me; UC is calling Lynch and I want to make sure I'm being
> consistent with what Enron has been saying.  My fax number is: 834-2310.
>
> Thanks,
> Dian


Could you coordinate with Cindy Stark on the meeting with Massey in a couple
of weeks?  Stan has asked me if I would like to attend.  I would, but don't
know when exactly it is scheduled for.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/30/2001
07:41 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
04/26/2001 04:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side
of the Story

I agree.  I suggest the following.  Joe, we need you to go give a pitch to
Massey's assistats about what is going on.  Next Jerry Halvorsen has
scheduled a lunch with Massey in two weeks.  He has invited me to attend.
What do you think?

Steven J Kean
04/26/2001 03:09 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

We need to communicate with Massey before he gets completely carried away
blaming the interstate pipeline business for gas price spikes.  We need to
get him the information regarding Cal LDCs failure to fill storage and their
opposition to additional pipeline construction in the state.  Shelley --
could you forward copies of the LDC filings to the group.  Should Joe or I
(or both) try to see massey when I am in town next week?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 06:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enro@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

Last week, I distributed a presentation that the Brattle Group gave before
the California Inquisition (i.e., legislative gas oversight committee looking
into the gas price spikes at the Cal border).

The Brattle Group is a consulting firm that Edison has long used to beat up
on SoCalGas (recall that Edison used to be a big gas customer when it owned
power plants).  Edison "arranged" for the Brattle Group to be the star
witness at the Cal Leg gas hearing.  Their job was to set up El Paso and
Dynegy for the hit at hearings that took place the following day.  Their
message was simple (and simplistic):

El Paso and Dynegy have market power.
They have used the market power to drive up basis and thus the price of gas
at the border (to "obscene" levels).
That, in turn, has driven up electricity prices.

Ken Lay is giving a gas talk tomorrow, and Rob Bradley asked that I provide
the alternative view to the Edison/Brattle rant, in the event that he gets
any questions on the topic.  It's attached.  Apologies, it's quick and dirty,
but it provides the basics.

Obviously no need for us to defend El Paso or Dynegy, but might be useful to
offer a more rationale explanation than the one that the California
Legislature is peddling.

Finally, we were also fingered somewhat as culprits at the hearing (the
California PUC FERC lawyer claimed that ENA and TW colluded to drive up basis
when ENA controlled a portion of  the capacity), but the overriding goal of
the hearing was to go after EP and Dynegy.

Best,
Jeff


i would really like to go now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:55 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Sounds like a good plan to me!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:53 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

when we get upstairs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:53 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

when?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ill let you know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

What are we going to do next week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

yeah i think so, we will make it next week, if you are going to leave any earlier let me know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:50 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I probably won't be able to leave until 4. I'm sure you'll be gone by then.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:49 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im not sure yet, let me know what you are doing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

When are you leaving today?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i hope you can figure it out, let me know if you need help

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I wish! I've been sitting here trying to figure out how I can see you today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:45 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

is it next week yet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:44 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Well then I guess I'm going to have to wear them more often.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:42 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

i like the glasses


The available transmission sheet has been updated.

c

Holden Salisbury
04/30/2001 04:44 PM
To:	Stacy Runswick/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susie Wilson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Transmission purchases

I have purchased 78mw of transmission monthly firm from APS for May , Palo Verde to West Wing.  The oasis number is 21253 and the deal number is 594301.  This replaces the daily transmission that I had previously purchased.

I also reserved 50mws of tranny monthly firm from APS, Palo Verde to Four Corners 345.  This is from 5/2 - 5/31.  Oasis # is 21254, deal number is 597347.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks


Just give a call when you get a chance.  I'm in.  415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:00 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: PG&E's Gas Accord II application

call me when you have a moment - I visited with PG&E at their meeting in Napa...

We own 200,000 mmbtu/day of Baja capacity through Dec 2002 - I am not sure that they plan on rolling those agreements

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:15 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Tholt, Jane M.; Miller, Stephanie; Lawner, Leslie;
Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject: FW: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

FYI.  This should be interesting.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart, John C [mailto:JCSv@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 6:51 PM
To: 'alan_reid@pcp.ca'; 'andy.bettwy@swgas.com'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
'askaff@energy-law-group.com'; 'bcragg@gmssr.com';
'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us';
'blaising@braunlegal.com'; 'burkee@cts.com'; 'bwood@energy.state.ca.us';
'ceyap@earthlink.net'; 'chilen@llgm.com'; 'chj@a-klaw.com';
'craigc@calpine.com'; 'davef@abag.ca.gov'; 'dcarroll@dbsr.com';
'douglas.porter@sce.com'; 'dwa3@pge.com'; 'ed@clfp.com';
'edf@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'edwardoneill@dwt.com'; 'ek@a-klaw.com';
'eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us'; 'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'eyq@cpuc.ca.gov';
'fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us'; 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil';
'ghinners@reliantenergy.com'; 'grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us';
'gsullivan@sempra.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com';
'haorndorff@aeraenergy.com'; 'iep@iepa.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
'inggm@sce.com'; 'jcattermole@pcenergy.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com';
'jkarp@whitecase.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'jmct@gmssr.com';
'joe.paul@dynegy.com'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com'; 'johnwalley@swgas.com';
'joseh@lif.org'; 'jpbatmale@realenergy.com'; 'jsteffen@iid.com';
'jsw@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'jweil@aglet.org'; 'jwr@cpuc.ca.gov';
'karen@klindh.com'; 'kbhensman@aeraenergy.com';
'kfyip@seiworldwide.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'kmills@cfbf.com';
'lifcentral@lif.org'; 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com'; 'lmh@eslawfirm.com';
'mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com'; 'mcn@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'mday@gmssr.com';
'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; 'mer@cpuc.ca.gov';
'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com';
'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'; 'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'ram@cpuc.ca.gov';
'raveen_maan@city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'raw@cpuc.ca.gov';
'rax@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'rczahar@aol.com';
'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'rgloistein@orrick.com';
'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'rmp@cpuc.ca.gov';
'rochmanm@cubjpa.org'; 'roger.pelote@williams.com';
'ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com'; 'ronknecht@aol.com'; 'rpetti@ladwp.com';
'salleyoo@dwt.com'; 'sbs@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'skatz@sempratrading.com';
'slins@ci.glendale.ca.us'; 'sscott3@enron.com';
'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us'; 'tah@cpuc.ca.gov';
'tdickers@westerngas.com'; 'thompson@wrightlaw.com';
'tom.roth@et.pge.com'; 'tomb@crossborderenergy.com';
'trdill@westernhubs.com'; 'vjb@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'cabaker@duke-energy.com';
'mtbrommer@tid.org'; 'keith.brown@swgas.com'; 'bbrunel@smud.org';
'pcervin@br-inc.com'; 'scohn@smud.org';
'bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com'; 'jdasovic@enron.com';
'eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'bobfraser@aec.ca';
'frazier@bull.som.yale.edu'; 'agold@coral-energy.com';
'marcel@turn.org'; 'steve.huhman@mirant.com'; 'pkeeler@br-inc.com';
'alan.killion@williams.com'; 'kl@mrwassoc.com'; 'llorenz@pacent.com';
'kmagruder@newpower.com'; 'jmartini@cipa.org';
'sandra_mcdonough@pcp.ca'; 'pat_mulhern@oxy.com'; 'gnadeau@suncor.com';
'mnyberg@energy.state.ca.us'; 'judypau@dwt.com'; 'pinney@capp.ca';
'rpurves@sdge.com'; 'gregs@mid.org'; 'peter.saunders@paramountres.com';
'michael_r._soland@oxy.com'; 'tsurak@socalgas.com';
'jsuwara@sempra.com'; 'JeffreyGray@dwt.com'; Kauss, Kent;
'wgmanuel@tid.org'; 'mflorio@turn.org'
Cc: Lindh, Frank (Law); Lieu, Lisa; 'Fogelmanm@steefel.com'; McLafferty,
Daniel; Williams, Ray; Bellenger, Geoffrey
Subject: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Today, October 9, 2001, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed an
application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

In this application, PG&E proposes a market structure and rules for the
northern California natural gas industry, beginning
January 1, 2003.  PG&E's filing was in response to a recent Commission order
(Decision 01-09-016), which directed PG&E to file a "Gas Accord II"
application.

If you have any problems opening these documents, please contact me at (415)
973-8677.

 <<CovLtr_GAII.doc>>        <<GAII_final.doc>>         <<GAII_Exhibit.pdf>>
Thank you,

John Stewart
Case Coordinator
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(415)973-8677
jcsv@pge.com


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/18/01 MANAGEMENT-COAL -2949.89667608894
1/18/01 MANAGEMENT-CRD -25479.530269461
1/18/01 MANAGEMENT-GAS -220528.502062834
1/18/01 MANAGEMENT-PWR -317853.634803495
1/18/01 AGG-MANAGEMENT -435309.04501028


Interesting letter....

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:36 PM -----

	"Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
	03/01/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: "'sue.nord@enron.com'" <sue.nord@enron.com>, "'scott_bolton@enron.net'"
<scott_bolton@enron.net>, "'sburns@enron.com'" <sburns@enron.com>
		 cc: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>, "Aamoth, Robert J."
<RAamoth@KelleyDrye.com>
		 Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

Dear Sue, Scott and Steve -- The letter below from George Gilder to FCC
Chairman Powell sets important parameters for our "vision".  We anticipated
that Powell would be unimpressed, if not hostile, to "open access"
approaches, but this should put a nail in the coffin.  The watchword will be
"innovation".  I imagine that both "Telecosm" and Hamel's "Leading the
Revolution" are high on Powell's reading list!

We look forward to talking with you next week.  Aileen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Engel, Michael C.
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Telecommunications Practice Group
Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

This is an interesting letter to Commissioner Powell published last week.
Given the level of respect that the Commissioner has for Mr. Gilder (MKP has
repeatedly referenced Gilder's book Telecosm and speaks of him frequently),
it may be worth reading.  In any event, it gives a pretty good 30,000 foot
view of telecom policy considerations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Jackson [mailto:pjackson@fcc.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:09 PM
To: powell_interns@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

** Confidential **

The Wall Street Journal
Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Friday, February 23, 2001

The Broadband Economy Needs a Hero
By George Gilder and Bret Swanson

  Dear Mr. Powell:

  Whether you know it or not, your leadership and decisions over the next
four years will have more impact on the economy than those of Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

   Surely, our stock-market swoon of 2000 and stagnating economic growth in
2001 are partly due to the Fed's inexplicable liquidity leash combined with
the highest tax burden since World War II. But the chief threats to the
21st- century economy are the politicians, bureaucrats and Silicon Valley
know-nothings responsible for America's broadband connectivity crisis.

  We owe Les Vadasz of Intel an apology for making fun of his prediction
that narrowband links would prevail into the 21st century. The Internet as
we know it is about seven years old, yet fewer than 7 million of 100 million
American homes enjoy broadband and its wealth of social, commercial and
educational opportunities.

  Contrary to popular belief, the chief obstacle to progress is not
entrenched Bell operating companies, but a regulatory regime that presumes
to "level the playing field," "equalize access," and "promote competition."
The only result of these policies has been the effective nationalization and
paralysis of broadband.

  The 1996 Telecommunications Act ruled that in exchange for the right to
enter the long-distance telephone business, the Bells must open their
residential copper lines to competitors, as well as allow these competitors
to locate equipment in Bell central offices and offer digital subscriber
line (DSL) services over Bell-owned copper. In November 1999, the FCC issued
a further decree forcing the Bells to stop dragging their feet and
cooperate.

  The FCC actions spawned a new category of start-ups known as broadband
competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), which planned to compete with
the Bells. Funded by billions of dollars in Silicon Valley venture capital
and public offerings, companies like Rhythms, Northpoint, Covad and Jato
earned praise from "libertarians" in both Washington and Palo Alto, Calif.
Northpoint even had freedom-loving former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt on its
board.

  But despite all good intentions, these were not high-tech start-ups. They
became venture capital-funded lobbying and litigation shops intent on
forcing the Bells to share their copper. With more press releases on new
lawsuits than on new subscribers, one of the companies epitomized the
strategy: "Rhythms continues successful regulatory litigation." The result
of all this lawyering? The CLECs won everything. Access to copper wherever
they sued. Multimillion- dollar awards from the Bells. And bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy?

  Late last year, Northpoint filed for Chapter 11 after Verizon withdrew an
$800 million investment. Jato closed its doors. Rhythms cut its staff by
23%. Covad is slashing 800 jobs and closing 260 central offices. Of Covad's
274,000 lines in service, 92,000 are not "recognizing revenue." And all of
this is happening in the face of massive consumer demand for broadband
services.

  The problem is that DSL is risky and hard. Some studies have reported that
50% of DSL hook-ups fail on the first try. Even amicable relationships
between CLECs and Bells are a software nightmare, with a different billing
and provisioning system for each service provider. Such difficulties render
DSL not a matter of will and politics but of technical and entrepreneurial
risks. Companies are forced to invest heavily in research and engineering
personnel, but have few opportunities for outsized rewards.

  That's because Congress and the FCC set up an awkward scheme in which
everyone got a piece of the action but no one could make any money. Often
barred from carrying signals across long-distance boundaries, the Bells hand
off traffic to other long-distance carriers. CLECs rent lines from the
Bells. And Internet service providers end up doing costly customer service
and marketing to get people signed up in the first place. In short, as many
as four parties routinely battle for low- or negative-margin chunks of
$40-monthly bills.

  By summoning new competition and then mandating the rivals cooperate in
open access, the government effectively privatized the risks and socialized
the profits. By December, the Bells had signed up 1.8 million users and the
CLECs 600,000, combining for just 2.4 million DSL subscribers among the 120
million or so copper-connected U.S. homes and businesses.

  Cable modems, with 4.9 million subscribers at year-end, have done better,
but AOL Time Warner and AT&T, America's two cable behemoths, are bogged down
by the same open-access nonsense that plagues DSL. Over the past two years,
AT&T CEO Michael Armstrong acquired $140 billion in cable assets while
watching his company's $184 billion market capitalization plummet to $81
billion.

  Just last month the Federal Trade Commission ruled that AOL Time Warner
must offer "at least one non-affiliated cable broadband ISP [Internet
Service Provider] service on Time Warner's cable system before AOL itself
begins offering service, followed by two other non-affiliated ISPs within 90
days and a requirement to negotiate in good faith with others after that."
The nation's second-largest ISP, EarthLink, will now get access to AOL's
expensive cables pretty much for free.

  This regulatory morass treats the most dynamic, technically creative, and
transformative industry in the world economy as if it were some static
commodity market for corn or pork bellies.

  Mr. Chairman, in a recent speech you made the key point that innovation is

more important than price competition. When it comes to leading-edge
services and technologies, narrow price competition is almost meaningless.
Internet innovation means qualitative change, order-of-magnitude price
reductions and constantly changing services that always constitute
monopolies when first launched.

  No Internet advantage can last more than a couple of years. In 1999 and
2000, over 150 million kilometers of optical fiber were laid world-wide,
enough to stretch to the sun. Hundreds of billions of dollars have already
been invested by metropolitan fiber-optic network builders (Metromedia
Fiber, Level 3 Communications), optical hardware companies (Avanex, ONI,
Sorrento) and optical service providers (Yipes, Cogent, Sphera). These
companies are already rendering the metropolitan DSL debate moot with
thousand-fold increases in price performance over existing technology.
Similar breakthroughs are on the way in residential wireless. But none of
these deployments, including fiber to the home, can flourish under a regime
of forced sharing of entrepreneurial assets and profits.

  In this environment, let the Bells compete in long-distance and extort any
temporary profits they can from their local copper cages. Let the cable
companies capitalize on their advantage for the few years it will last.
Allow the infinite spectrum of air and fiber to be exploited in any way its
owners wish. Then, sit back, and nostalgically recall those early days of
the Internet, when we naively thought a 5% economic growth rate was really
something. The broadband economy needs a hero. President Bush and Mr.
Greenspan need a technology savior. You are the man best equipped to play
that role.

  ---

Paul A. Jackson
Special Assistant to the Chairman
Office of Chairman Michael K. Powell
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Suite 8B201
Washington, DC  20554
Phone: 202-418-1000
Fax: 202-418-2801
E-mail: pjackson@fcc.gov
Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/powell/

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named
recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney
work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have
received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender at (202) 418-1000 and delete this e-mail
message from your computer, Thank you.

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any
other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think
that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
sender. This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for
viruses and are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it
is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2000
11:11 AM ---------------------------

SSher5DUN@aol.com on 02/13/2000 09:25:01 PM
To: abarnett@mapus.com, gary@bmicmortgage.com, joaniem5770@yahoo.com,
Rahkneebee@aol.com, sshackl@enron.com, labdsc@womans.com
cc:
Subject: Thats-Nice.com Email addresses

As promised, here is the list:

Sher family:

Steve & Anita:  ssher5dun@aol.com
Marc:  msher@dlalaw.com
Allison:  "allison_b_sher"@uhc.com

Schiller family:

Gary:  gary@bmicmortgage.com
Joan:  joaniem5770@yahoo.com
Neil & Robin:  schneil@ibm.net
Amy:  aimee1132@aol.com

Barnett family:

Arnold & Ellen:  abarnett@mapus.com
Ronnie:  rahkneebee@aol.com

Shackleton family:

Sara:  sshackl@enron.com

Cavalier family:

Steve & Debbi:  labdsc@womans.com

Please send corrections, updates and additions to me and I will recirculate.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Todays IPOs  [IMAGE] IPO - Quiet Periods   [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Period     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for CMGI  follows from EquityAlert.com.     CMGI Retires Series C Preferred Stock, Substantially Strengthening Capital Structure   ANDOVER, Mass., Nov 20, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- CMGI, Inc. (Nasdaq: CMGI) today announced that it has retired its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock under the terms of an agreement with the Series C stockholders. The agreement represents successful conclusion of CMGI's focused efforts to eliminate outstanding debt and convertible preferred instruments.   In June 1999, CMGI completed a $375 million private placement of newly issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, the June 2002 maturity value of which is estimated to be approximately $398 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the Series C stockholders retired the obligation in full in exchange for aggregate consideration consisting of: 1) approximately $100.3 million in cash; 2) an obligation to deliver approximately 448.3 million ordinary shares of Pacific Century Cyberworks (PCCW) owned by CMGI no later than December 2, 2002, and, 3) approximately 34.7 million shares of CMGI common stock, which shares shall be subject to certain volume and other trading restrictions.   The Series C stock retirement is the second of two major financial restructuring initiatives focused on improving CMGI's capital structure. Earlier this month, the company and two of its subsidiaries, NaviSite, Inc. and AltaVista Company, announced the successful completion of an agreement with Compaq Computer Corporation and Compaq Financial Services to retire, restructure and realign key financial obligations.   "With today's agreement, we've effectively closed the second chapter of our financial restructuring initiatives and significantly improved our capital structure in line with the company's long-term goals," said George McMillan, chief financial officer, CMGI, Inc. "The successful retirement of both the Compaq and Series C obligations now frees CMGI and its subsidiaries to focus our resources on strengthening our fiscal management and executing on an operating plan to grow our businesses in 2002 and beyond. We expect that this capital restructuring, coupled with our ongoing fundamental restructuring and alignment of our business, will enable us to focus our resources on ongoing initiatives to accelerate recurring operating profitability and position the company for growth-focused activities."   About CMGI and @Ventures  CMGI, Inc. (Nasdaq: CMGI), a leading global Internet operating and development company, is comprised of established and emerging companies, including both CMGI operating businesses and investments made through its venture capital affiliate, @Ventures. CMGI companies span a range of vertical market segments including search and portals; infrastructure and enabling technologies; e-business and fulfillment; marketing software and services; and Internet professional services. Compaq, Pacific Century CyberWorks and Sumitomo hold minority positions in CMGI.   CMGI's majority-owned operating companies include Engage (Nasdaq: ENGA), NaviSite (Nasdaq: NAVI), AltaVista, Equilibrium, SalesLink, Tallan, uBid and yesmail.com. @Ventures has ownership interests in more than 40 companies, with a focus on identifying, investing in and developing emerging technology companies and eBusinesses.   CMGI's corporate headquarters is located at 100 Brickstone Square, Andover, MA 01810. @Ventures has offices there, as well as at 3000 Alpine Road, Menlo Park, CA 94028. For additional information, see http://www.cmgi.com and http://www.ventures.com.   This release contains forward-looking statements which address a variety of subjects including, for example, the expected benefits of the agreement with certain of CMGI's equityholders to retire all of the outstanding shares of CMGI's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, efforts to accelerate recurring operating profitability and the results of growth-focused activities. The following important factors and uncertainties, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements: CMGI's success, including its ability to decrease its cash burn rate, improve its cash position and revenue run rate and reach profitability, depends on its ability to execute on its business strategy and the continued and increased demand for and market acceptance of CMGI's products and services and the Internet in general; CMGI may experience difficulties integrating technologies, operations and personnel in accordance with its business strategy; and increased competition and technological changes in the markets in which CMGI competes. For a detailed discussion of cautionary statements that may affect CMGI's future results of operations and financial results, please refer to CMGI's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including CMGI's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed October 29, 2001.   CONTACT:          CMGI Corporate Communications    CMGI Investor Relations                   Deidre Moore                     Catherine Taylor                   (978) 684-3655                   (978) 684-3832                   dmoore@cmgi.com                  ctaylor@cmgi.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          MASSACHUSETTS INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BANKING                   COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS                   INTERNET                   SOFTWARE                   SOURCE:                   CMGI    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***  At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]


Debbie:

	On the gas side with Duke, the new master states that the non-payment default cure is 3 business days.  All of Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC gas trades are under this master.  More information will follow.

Jeff


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: from ap_go_wsecure ([207.241.20.98]) by smtp-gw.nicor.com; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:31:18 -0600
Received: from 192.128.167.69 by ap_go_wsecure with ESMTP (Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:28:55 -0600
X-Server-Uuid: 126109c8-9927-11d3-9a8d-00508b92c0ef
Received: from njb140r1.ems.att.com ([135.65.202.58]) by almso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-3.0) with ESMTP id fARKVZD09698 for <VBrawne@nicor.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gab200bh2.ems.att.com by njb140r1.ems.att.com ( 8.8.8+Sun/ATTEMS-1.4.1 sol2) id PAA08849; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:30:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by GAB200BH2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <XV5K3ABB>; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:31:30 -0500
Message-ID: <33AB9F0F694ED311B5810000C0AAE4F40551DA2E@gab200po08.ems.att.com>
From: "Mayberry, Harold K, BMCIO" <hmayberry@att.com>
To: "'Valada Brawner'" <VBrawne@nicor.com>,	"Chatmon, Lucile J, BMCIO" <lchatmon@att.com>,	"Carter, Annie S (Sharon), NSPM" <ascarter@att.com>,	"Cobb, Darcy J, BMCIO" <djcobb@att.com>,	"Hampton, Kim E, BMCIO" <kehampton@att.com>,	"Fitzwater, Elizabeth G (Gail), BMCIO" <efitzwater@att.com>,	"Brown, Vivian, GOVMK" <vivianbrown@att.com>,	"King, Yolanda J, BMCIO" <kingy@att.com>,	"Johnson, Melvia J, BMCIO" <melvia@att.com>
Subject: FW: FW: Great Test
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:31:27 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-WSS-ID: 101D280D65555-01-01
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

-
Subject: FW: FW: Great Test

> >>PERSONALITY TEST.
> >>
> >>Very interesting. Just 4 questions and the answers will
> >>surprise you.
> >>
> >> Do not cheat by looking up the answers. The mind is like
> >>parachute, it works best when it is opened.
> >>
> >>This is fun to do, but you have to follow the instructions very
> >>closely. Do
> >>not cheat.
> >>
> >>Make a wish before beginning the test!!!
> >>
> >>Warning!
> >> Answer the questions as you go along.
> >>
> >>There are only four questions and if you see them all before
> >>finishing, you
> >>will not have honest results.
> >>
> >> Go down
> >>slowly and do each exercise as you scroll down.
> >> Don't
> >>look ahead. Get pencil and paper to write your
> >> answers
> >>as you go
> >>along. You will need it at the end. This is an
> >>honest
> >>questionnaire which will tell you a lot about
> >>your
> >> true
> >>self.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Put the following 5 animals in the order of your preference.
> >> a. Cow
> >>
> >> b. Tiger
> >>
> >>c. Sheep
> >>
> >>d. Horse
> >>
> >>e. Pig
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Write one word that describes each one of the following:
> >> Dog
> >>
> >> Cat
> >>
> >> Rat
> >>
> >>Coffee
> >>
> >> Sea
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Think of someone (who also knows you and is important to you) that
> >>you can relate them to the following colors
> >>(do not repeat your answer twice. Name just one person for each
> >>color.)
> >>
> >>Yellow
> >>
> >> Orange
> >>
> >> Red
> >>
> >> White
> >>
> >>Green
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Finally, write down your favorite number and your favorite day of
> >>the week.
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>
> >>
> >>Finished? Please be sure that your answers are what you REALLY
> >>WANT.
> >>
> >>Look at the interpretations below: (but first before continuing,
> >>repeat your
> >>wish.)
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>*
> >>
> >>This will define your priorities in your life.
> >>
> >> Cow Signifies CAREER
> >>
> >>Tiger Signifies PRIDE
> >>
> >>Sheep Signifies LOVE
> >>
> >> Horse Signifies FAMILY
> >>
> >> Pig Signifies MONEY
> >>
> >>
> >> Your description of dog implies YOUR OWN PERSONALITY.
> >>
> >>Your description of cat implies the personality of your
> >> partner.
> >>
> >>Your description of rat implies the personality of your enemies.
> >>
> >> Your description of coffee is how you interpret SEX.
> >>
> >>Your description of the Sea implies your own life.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yellow: Someone you will never forget
> >>
> >>Orange: Someone you consider your true friend
> >>
> >> Red: Someone that you really love
> >>
> >> White: Your twin soul
> >>
> >> Green-Someone that you will remember for the rest of your life
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> You have
> >>to send this message to as many persons as
> >>your
> >>favorite
> >>number and your wish will come true on the day
> >>that
> >> you
> >> put. This
> >>is what the Dalai Lama has said about the
> >>
> >>Millennium -- just take a few seconds to read it and
> >>think.
> >>
> >> Do not
> >>put away this message, the mantra will come out
> >>from
> >> your
> >>hands in the next 96 hours.
> >> You will
> >>have a very pleasant surprise. This is true,
> >>even
> >> if you
> >>are not superstitous.
> >>
> >> Please do
> >>this. It is fascinating.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> SEND THIS
> >>E-MAIL MANTRA TO AT LEAST FIVE PERSONS AND
> >>YOUR
> >> LIFE WILL
> >>IMPROVE
> >> 0-4
> >>persons: Your life will improve slightly
> >> 5-9
> >>persons: Your life will improve to your liking
> >> 9-14
> >>persons: You will have at least 5 surprises in the
> >>next
> >> three
> >>weeks
> >> 15 or
> >>more persons: Your life will improve drastically
> >>and
> >> all that
> >>you have always dreamed will take shape
> >>
> >>
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I think that is exactly right.  I suspect that the marketing guys could work
up a simple formula for determining our course of action depending on the
size of the revenue opportunity vs. the power cost/penalty.  Thanks. df

From: Randy Rice on 12/15/2000 07:53 AM
Sent by: Randy Rice
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron
cc: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Drew, I plan to discuss this with Rich Jolly, and will call you with our
thoughts. I would suggest our plan be such that we do not just aoutomatically
shut down during these periods but work with marketing to create a cost vs.
benefit profile of when/if it may make sense to operate even when in a peak
state?
R2

	Drew Fossum
	12/14/2000 05:31 PM

		 To: James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie
Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Randy, this is the issue I left you the voice mail on.  Article 6 of the
Gallup Compression Services Agreement (which I am sending to you separately)
with ECS obligates ECS to "work in good faith with CDEC" to establish an
automated system that would automatically have alerted us to peak loading
conditions on CDEC's system.  We had a pretty good idea when we signed the
contract that ECS would not be able to complete that by the contract start
date, so we negotiated a fall back plan under which ECS is obligated to
"assist [Transwestern] in developing a manual system to accomplish the same
result and will hold harmless and keep [Transwestern] whole for all cost and
expenses" associated with the manual system.  We will fight with them about
who owes the $200k that James mentions below based on their failure to
"assist" us in managing the cost.  In the mean time, we need to make sure
that we are doing everything we can to get a handle on the situation to
mitigate future costs.  Do we have someone who is watching this out there?
We are running so full tilt on TW that we may not have as much flexibiltiy to
manage this situation as we expected, but let me know what we can do.  James
had heard that one hold up was the absence of a confidentiality agreement--I
guess between ECS and Transwestern--that would permit ECS to communicate to
us the details on how to access teh key info. from CDEC.  That sounds like a
BS excuse from ECS, but it that's what they are saying, let me know and we
can figure out a solution.  Thanks.  DF

James Centilli
12/14/2000 02:49 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Rebate

Would you please contact Gerald Nemec and review the Gallup Compression
Service Contract in respect to the Load Control Management.  My understanding
was that ECS was to provide a means to access CDEC's online profile in order
for us to make a decision to avoid running the compressor during CDEC's peak
load periods.  We have not received access to this information which has
resulted so far in additional electric cost of $200,987.33 for the period of
July through September.  Additional cost will be incurred for the remainder
of this year, that I have not been able to review yet.  This cost is
averaging $79,000 per month if we continue to run the compressor as we have
in August and September.


As per our discussion yesterday, please find below some information on our past discussions with i2, our current status and our suggested course of action for your call with i2.  If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 36635 or my assistant is Tina Spiller at 35746.

Thanks.

Greg Piper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelby, Rex
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Piper, Greg
Cc:	Shelby, Rex
Subject:	EnronOnline Opportunity with i2

As background for Mr. Lay's call to Sanjiv Sidhu of i2 concerning the EnronOnline opportunity, here is a brief summary of where we stand and our suggestions:

History of Enron/i2 Discussions

i2 was one the initial companies contacted by Enron Net Works (ENW) for the EnronOnline commercial discussion.
The focus of the Enron/i2 discussion earlier this year was a complete sale of the software asset that drives EnronOnline to i2.
i2 expressed considerable interest in the opportunity below the executive level, but ENW had difficulty getting a concrete bid or proposal from i2.
In order to get the discussion started, ENW provided an offer to i2.
i2's response to the Enron offer was that they considered it high and that they would prefer to partner with Enron in some manner in addition to some form of purchase.
ENW expressed interest in talking with i2 about this and requested that they outline their preferred deal to Enron.
ENW never received a term sheet or other information on a new price and partnering concept from i2.

Current Status of EnronOnline Commercial Initiative

Since those early discussions with i2, ENW has discussed the EnronOnline opportunity with other selected technology companies, and is now considering bids from several potential counterparties.
Generally speaking the deal structure that appears to provide the best opportunity for both parties entails involvement by ENW after the transaction, in the form of equity participation or royalty payments or both, as well as the transfer of some Enron people.
This seems to move us into the realm of a "partnership" structure that could fit the initial i2 interest.

Current Enron/i2 Status

Rex Shelby talked briefly with Greg Brady, i2 CEO, at a conference in NYC two weeks ago.
Greg Brady expressed interest in renewing talks around the EnronOnline opportunity.

Current Status of the Sale Opportunity

We are now reaching the point in the process at which we need to determine whether there is an interest from i2.
We want to make sure we give i2 the opportunity to outline a proposal with a price as well as outline their needs for a relationship going forward, or to confirm that they are not interested.

Suggested Message to Sanjiv Sidhu

Our suggested message to Sanjiv is:
.
1.	Enron remains interested in exploring this opportunity with i2 if there is a genuine interest from i2.
2.  	Enron is open to considering deal structures that provide incentive for participation by Enron after the transaction.
3.  	Enron is moving down the path with other parties, so if i2 has an interest, we would need to start working with them soon.

Thank you for your assistance on this.  Please let us know if you need more information.


Bob, can you please take a look at the following
article for today Column?

Vince


Ken

I was able to enjoy the basketball game last night in your seats.  My family
and I had a wonderful time.

Thanks

John Lavorato


Motley just entered these last three trades. And Chris Mallory is entering
the AEP deal right now.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/11/2001 02:04 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/11 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
all o.k.

PREBON WEST

Matt Motley
I am missing the following:

1) Enron buys from Williams 25 mw SP Q4'02 at $81.00
2) Enron buys from Allegheny 25 mw PV Q4'01 at $199
3) Enron sells Avista 25mw PV Q4'01 at $199

AMEREX WEST

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from AEP 25 mw May SP-15 light at $172.00


I am taking off half a day PM on Dec 29th and Jan 1st - 3rd.

Please put this on Dicks calendar and the desk calendar.

thanks


That would be great.

Kay Mann
29 Inverness Park Way
Houston 77055

Thanks,

Kay

Jo Swank <JSwank@graceschool.org> on 08/25/2000 12:44:42 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Kindergarten

Dear Kay,
Just let me know a convenient day and time for you.  In the meantime,
perhaps you would like for us to go ahead and mail an admissions packet to
you.  If so, please give me your address and it will go out in today's mail.

Thanks!
Jo

At 09:33 AM 8/25/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Jo,
>
>We had some unexpected complications with scheduling today.  We'll have to
>reschedule.
>
>Thanks for such a prompt reply.
>
>Kay
>
>
>
>
>Jo Swank <JSwank@graceschool.org> on 08/24/2000 05:21:10 PM
>
>To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
>cc:
>
>Subject:  Re: Kindergarten
>
>Dear Kay,
>I would be delighted to visit with you and your husband tomorrow.  I will
>be free at 10:30 a.m.  Will this work for you?  I will call a leave a
>message as well.  Hope to meet you tomorrow.
>
>Jo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 12:25 PM 8/24/00 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi Jo,
>>
>>I left you a voice mail, but being an email addict I thought I would send
>>you a note as well.
>>
>>Our son, Michael is in a Montessori kindergarten, which we have decided
>may
>>not be most suitable for him.  We discussed it with Vivian Shudde, and she
>>suggested that I give you a call about the Grace School.
>>
>>My husband and I would like to visit Grace.  We are wondering if it might
>>be possible to visit tomorrow.  Please let me know what you think.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Kay Mann
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Attached are some minor clean-up points to the previous e-mail.


News Briefs:

Reliant Energy Plans to Form Two Public Companies

Reliant Energy said it plans to file with the Texas Public Utility
Commission a business separation plan under which it would divide into two
publicly traded companies to separate its unregulated businesses from its
regulated businesses.

The company plans an initial public offering of approximately 20% of the
common stock of its unregulated operations late this year or early in 2001,
assuming market conditions remain favorable. The company expects the IPO to
be followed by a distribution to shareholders of the remaining stock of the
unregulated company within 12 months. The remaining businesses, which are
predominately regulated, will be structured as a holding company.

The unregulated company will own Reliant Energy's unregulated power
generation and related energy trading and marketing operations, its
unregulated retail businesses, which currently include energy,
telecommunications and internet services, and the company's European
electric generating and trading/marketing operations. The plan also
contemplates that in 2004 the unregulated company will receive from the
regulated company cash equal to the market value of the regulated company's
interest in its Texas regulated generation operations. In addition, the
unregulated company will have an option to purchase the regulated company's
interest in these operations at a price equal to the market value.

The regulated company will include Reliant Energy's electricity and natural
gas companies, which serve about four million customers in the U.S. and
include Reliant Energy HL&P/Entex, Reliant Energy Arkla, Reliant Energy
Entex and Reliant Energy Minnegasco. Other operations in the entity will
include its U.S. interstate pipelines, its interests in Latin America and,
initially, its Texas regulated generation.


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for YHOO
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Looking for an emerging growth company in an exciting, burgeoning
industry.

Search no more. Xraymedia.Com (OTC BB: XRMD) is currently assembling
partners to undertake the business of selling conventional
advertising space and online advertising in an industry that broke
the $2billion dollar mark in the second quarter of 2000. For more
compelling information on this exciting investment opportunity,

click here: http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1249aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Yahoo! Sports Catches 'Big Air & Style' with U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team;
Leading Sports Site Enters into Marketing and Content Agreement as Exclusive
Internet Sponsor

SANTA CLARA, Calif., Dec 11, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Yahoo! (Nasdaq:YHOO), a
leading global Internet communications, commerce and media company, today
announced a fully-integrated marketing and content agreement with the U.S. Ski
and Snowboard Team. Through the agreement, Yahoo!(R) Sports
(http://sports.yahoo.com) receives title sponsorship of the "Yahoo! Sports Big
Air & Style" series, a set of three nationally-televised competitions on this
season's snowboard circuit. Content about U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team events,
including top news coverage from this year's World Cup circuit, is also
accessible on Yahoo! Sports(a), the Web's most popular sports site(b).

The relationship also calls for the U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team to utilize
Yahoo!'s global network of branded Web properties as a marketing platform for
athlete chats on Yahoo! Chat (http://chat.yahoo.com), e-commerce initiatives
and
sweepstakes during the season. In addition to the Yahoo! Sports Big Air &
Style
series, Yahoo! Sports serves as a sponsor of seven freestyle and snowboarding
races this season, all of which are aired on national broadcast networks.
Yahoo!
Sports patches will also appear on all of the U.S. Snowboard Team uniforms.

"We are extremely pleased to continue our affiliation with the U.S. Ski and
Snowboard Team following last year's successful marketing relationship," said
Mike Kelley, senior brand manager, Yahoo! Sports. "This relationship is
natural
brand fit for Yahoo!, and is core to our strategy of teaming with key
organizations that provide national exposure for the Yahoo! brand, while
bringing compelling content to Yahoo! Sports and our audience around the
world."

"World Cup skiing and snowboarding is one of the most popular multi-national
sports," said Bill Marolt, U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team president and CEO, and
a
former Olympic ski racer. "So it's exciting for us to have the support of a
truly global company such as Yahoo!"

The Yahoo! Sports Big Air & Style series comprises three separate races: Dec.
16
in Okemo, Vt.; Jan. 6, 2001 at Breckenridge, Colo.; and Feb. 10 at Mammoth
Mountain, Calif. Yahoo! Sports receives extensive branding leading up to and
throughout the events, including integration into event and network promotion
along with on-mountain signage. The additional seven races sponsored by Yahoo!
Sports will culminate with the X-nix U.S. Snowboard Championships in March
2001.

Catch World Cup Skiing and Snowboarding

Ski and snowboard enthusiasts can also rely on Yahoo! Sports Outdoors, the
outdoors-related area of Yahoo! Sports, to follow U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team
athletes in this year's World Cup series. The U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team is
providing full news coverage of major events, including World Cup skiing and
snowboarding throughout the 2000-2001 ski season, complementing additional
leading content providers, such as the Associated Press, Quokka Sports,
Reuters,
and SportsTicker(R), that give access to the World Cup news, results and
standings.

The U.S. Ski and Snowboard Team is managed by the U.S. Ski and Snowboard
Association (USSA), which is the national governing body for Olympic skiing
and
snowboarding, managing competition and athletic programs coast-to-coast. The
vision of USSA is to make the United States of America the best in Olympic
skiing and snowboarding, providing development and elite racing programs. USSA
coordinates nationwide programs in six distinctly different disciplines --
alpine skiing, cross country, disabled alpine and cross country, freestyle,
ski
jumping and nordic combined and snowboard. The federation was founded in 1904
and the national office has been based in Utah since 1973.

About Yahoo! Sports

Yahoo! Sports Outdoors is part of Yahoo! Sports, the largest branded and No. 1
online sports destination for October 2000(b) (Media Metrix custom report).
Yahoo! Sports(a) gives fans access to everything the sports world has to
offer.
Launched in 1997, Yahoo! Sports provides comprehensive up-to-the-minute news,
real-time statistics and scoring, broadcast programming, international and
local
coverage, outdoors sports content, integrated shopping and auctions
opportunities, and an online sports community. Yahoo! Sports is part of
Yahoo!'s
network of Web properties.

About Yahoo!

Yahoo! Inc. is a global Internet communications, commerce and media company
that
offers a comprehensive branded network of services to more than 166 million
individuals each month worldwide. As the first online navigational guide to
the
Web, www.yahoo.com is the leading guide in terms of traffic, advertising,
household and business user reach, and is one of the most recognized brands
associated with the Internet. The company also provides online business
services
designed to enhance the Web presence of Yahoo!'s clients, including audio and
video streaming, store hosting and management, and Web site tools and
services.
The company's global Web network includes 24 World properties. Yahoo! has
offices in Europe, the Asia Pacific, Latin America, Canada and the United
States, and is headquartered in Santa Clara, Calif.

(a) Yahoo! Sports is a collection of sports-specific URLs on the Yahoo!
network
as defined by Yahoo!

(b) For October 2000 according to a custom report provided by Media Metrix.
Category as defined by Yahoo! includes CNNSI.com, ESPN.com, FoxSports.com,
MLB.com, NASCAR.com, NBA.com, NFL.com, Rivals.com, Sportingnews.com,
Sportsline.com, USAToday Sports, and WWF.

Note to Editors: Yahoo! and the Yahoo! logo are registered trademarks of
Yahoo!
Inc. All other names are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of their
respective owners.

CONTACT:          Yahoo! Inc., Santa Clara
Dean Jutilla, 408/530-5338
djutilla@yahoo-inc.com
or
Fleishman-Hillard
Brian Martin, 212/453-2140
martinb@fleishman.com

URL:              http://www.businesswire.com
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.

Copyright (C) 2000 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          VERMONT COLORADO CALIFORNIA UTAH INTERNATIONAL EUROPE
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: E-COMMERCE
ELECTRONIC
GAMES/MULTIMEDIA
ENTERTAINMENT
INTERNET
SPORTS
MARKETING
AGREEMENTS
PRODUCT

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
07:31 AM ---------------------------

Julissa Marron@ENRON
01/14/2000 02:39 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Marvia
Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA Obligations to CES

The following meeting is to discuss ENA's obligations to CES, please plan to
attend.

TOPIC:  ENA Obligations to CES
DATE:  Tuesday, January 18, 2000
TIME:   4:00 PM - 5:00 PM
LOCATION:  49C1

Thank you,

Julissa Marron


Rick and Mark,

We have identified the next  20 non-US and non-European assets for regulatory
risk review.  Please advise us if we missed any other important assets that
come to your mind.  In addition, could you please confirm that we have
designated the appropriate EGA professional for each asset?

We would like to conclude this phase of review by  July 7th.

Thank you very much for your help.

Gia and John


Chris,

Thanks for the response and thanks for the consideration.  I accept and we're
done.  I will have a check out to you today via overnight mail.

Price:  9,500 less $500 plus $150 = $9,150

Please ship to:

Mike McConnell
13451 Belhaven Drive
Houston, Texas 77069

I look forward to doing business with you in the future.  I'll let you know
the next time I'm back in the market for a specific piece or artist.  Also
please give my home a call (281-895-6855) when the piece gets in the mail so
that I can make sure that my wife is around to accept delivery.

Sincerely,
Mike

PS - Your price was right on the mark for an easy personal decision.  My wife
actually preferred another piece that was slightly cheaper and this let me
get my favorite piece!

"Greg Hubert" <hubertart@earthlink.net> on 05/10/2001 11:27:34 AM
To: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Bonnard

Dear Mike,
Sorry the photos took so long to arrive in Texas.  We feel the piece is
fairly priced at $9,500. but will give you a $500. discount if this helps
your situation.  The crating will be $150. and the gallery will cover
insurance.
May Thanks,
C. Neptune

----- Original Message -----
From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
To: <hubertart@earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Bonnard

>
> Chris,
>
> I got the pictures yesterday.  They looked great and were very clear.  I
am
> interested in buying a Bonnard and am ready to make a decision on the one
> you have as well.  I will send you a check via overnight mail if we can
> come to an agreement.  What is your best and final total  price for the
> work?  I will make a yes or no answer upon my receipt of your email.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
>  PS -  I am going to pass on the Braque and Picasso for now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Greg Hubert" <hubertart@earthlink.net> on 05/08/2001 05:01:41 PM
>
> To:   <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Bonnard
>
> Dear Mike:
> Please let me know that the photos arrived.
> Thanks,
> Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
> To: <hubertart@earthlink.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Bonnard
>
>
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Thanks for the email.  I'll wait to get the pictures it will definitely
> > help.  I miss understood about the photos, I thought you were sending me
> > via email that next day.   Congrats on the Cassatt, that person will
> really
> > enjoy it.
> >
> > Let me know about the price as soon as you get a chance.  I understand
> that
> > there is a shipping component and no sales tax.  I like to have all my
> art
> > shipped because the tax savings can be significant, especially in New
> York.
> > I did like that frame on the picture but didn't understand your comment
> > below ($783).  The price you had did include the frame didn't it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Greg Hubert" <hubertart@earthlink.net> on 05/04/2001 11:05:39 AM
> >
> > To:   <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Bonnard
> >
> > Dear Mike:
> > Thanks for the email.  I sent a package via US mail with photos of each
> > piece to you on Wednesday night.  (The Cassatt was sold already, sorry.)
> I
> > thought you would want to look at the pieces with your wife, and make
the
> > decision together.
> >
> > We do not accept credit cards, but checks are fine.  I will speak ot Mr.
> > Hubert about the price, however are you interested in the frame?  Also
be
> > aware the crating charge for this piece is $150., but no sales tax.
> ($783.)
> >
> > Please wait for the images if you like, and we will speak soon.
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
> > To: <hubertart@earthlink.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:52 PM
> > Subject: Bonnard
> >
> >
> > > To:  Chris Neptune,
> > >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > Hello from Houston.  I really enjoyed meeting with you last Saturday
at
> > > your gallery.  Your collection of work is very impressive.
> > >
> > > I have not received your digital pictures that you were putting
> together
> > > but I did talk with my wife about the Bonnard.  The Bonnard is my
first
> > > choice of all the pieces we discussed.  I found an illustration of it
> on
> > > the net (from another gallery) and she liked (although - not as much
as
> > > me).  I am prepared to purchase a Bonnard and the Radiator is my first
> > > choice.  I would like to establish a relationship and do business with
> > your
> > > gallery and would like to know what is your best price for the piece.
> I
> > > will not shop the price around and will make a quick decision with a
> > credit
> > > card number.   When I get your response and if it is competitive, I'll
> > > confirm the purchase when I pick up the email.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mike McConnell
> > >
> > > PS - I will hold off on the others for now and when you send me the
> > > pictures I will show them to my wife for consideration.  I am
> considering
> > > the Mary Cassat as a gift for her.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


This is to nominate 27,800 MMBtu/d for 4/11 into Eastrans.

20,000 MMBtu/d will be redelivered into PG & E, the rest into
HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley.

We plan to begin receiving the gas at 3:00 pm or so and take
more volume to average the nominated quantity for the day.

As I indicated on the phone, it will also be necessary to
deliver more into PG & E after flow starts to average
nominated quantity.

Thanks.


Thanks you so much for working on these as fast as you have - there was a priority in getting them out.  However, as you know, the less cash outlay that we have right now the better.  Lets wait and try to offset the amount we owe them with what they owe us - so I say wait until you get July and August done.  What do you think the time frame is on this?  And when would be the earliest that we would make the payment?

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:38 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	City of Pasadena

Kim:
I have completed the invoices for April, May and June and we owe Pasadena each month for a total of $3,615,910.62.  I am waiting to hear back from Patti on May and June to make sure they are okay with her.  Do you want me to pay Pasadena on Friday for these months or do you want me to hold off until I finish July and August?  Again, I do not have all of the information for July and August, so I cannot give you any numbers.  If I go by what is currently in the system as a guide, Pasadena would owe Enron a little over $1 mil.  I need to forecast the money today, so please let me know what you would like to do.

FYI-I will be out of the office all next week.

Megan


We received the following executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreements:

Conexant Systems - 9/28/01
Fresh Express Incorporated - 9/27/01
Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission of the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, and Public Service Commission of Yazoo City of the City Yazoo City, Mississippi - 5/1/01
XERS INC d/b/a Xcel Energy - 10/4/01
City of Mesa, Arizona - 9/5/01
International Rectifier Corporation - 9/20/01
North Carolina Power Holdings, LLC - 7/12/01

A copy of each will be scanned into Livelink.


Baby, I'm going to San Francisco on Aug 14?(Sunday) returning Wednesday.
Wanna go??


Janet -

1.	The best split is probably just 50/50 on personnel.  While everyone is in a specific box on the org chart, many if not all of the people are flexible enough that they can cover different roles.  The $ on outside services may be able to be split differently going forward (for example, if EES wants something specific on a state PUC matter).
2.	In terms of approving outside service expenditures, I would like to sit down with you, Louise, and Rick to work out what the best method of working through the approvals.  I will try and set up some time the first week of December.
4.	I have put Steve Montovano in the NE Gas box.  This will increase the budget by $400k (based on historical figures).  I have attached a new org chart to represent this change.

Also, Dan Staines (who is not on the Org Chart) has an Employment contract that ends 6/12/2002.  Dan has been working on Florida and Northeast RTO matters and continues to help East Power with the NYISO TCC auction.  We can sever him, but his contract will need to be paid off ($87k).  Govt Affairs also has a contract for support with Joe Connor (ex-Southern exec) to support our SE activities.  I am trying to get a copy of the contract, but I think that it is in place until 8/02.  My recommendation is to use these guys through their contracts instead of a large payment today.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Janet
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Delaney, David; Steffes, James D.; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Govt Affairs Org Chart

EES is fine with the Org. chart below. I understand the $6.4 million is total for both ENA & EES. Comments:

1.) Need a recommended split of the $6.4 million for ENA/EES.
2.) I understand the $6.4 million includes $0 for Outside Services. The OOC of ENA/EES needs to approve as these services are needed.
3.) The $6.4 million does include legacy real estate costs. Jim Fallon is the coordination point on our real estate costs-is this on his radar screen?
4.) We need to reconcile what we do with Steve Montovano. Because both ENA/EES want to utilize him, I might suggest leaving him in the regulatory group so that both groups can effectively utilize him. Louise/Jim- are you both OK with this? If so, Rick/Jim, I would suggest putting him in the NE Gas Box.
5.) Rick, I understand you're talking with Kean/Whalley on handling the Washington office activity in Corp. I agree.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Govt Affairs Org Chart

Janet --

Here is the org chart that captures our discussions.  I think that this org and the # of people is the lowest level that can even try to meet the combined needs of ENA and EES.

Total headcount = 21.  The personnel cost = $6.4 MM (total for ENA and EES).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jim

 << File: ENA EES Govt Affairs 11.17.01.ppt >>


As discussed in last Friday's meeting on strategies related to higher energy
prices, Harry asked me to develop the attached projection of delivered gas
prices for this winter.

The projection is based upon EIA's monthly analysis of delivered gas prices
for residential, commercial and industrial customers for selected states
(Connecticut, Virginia, Illinois and Texas) for the 1999-2000 winter heating
season (Nov-Mar).  Assuming pipeline and LDC mark-ups remain constant, the
delivered prices were adjusted for the NYMEX Henry Hub projection of wellhead
prices for the 2000-2001 winter period.  A national projection is also
included.

Because the commodity portion of the gas bill for residential customers is a
smaller percent of the total bill compared to commercial and industrial
customers, the increase for residential customers will be less pronounced
than for commercial or industrial customers.  In addition, LDC purchased gas
cost mechanisms will moderate the effect of the price increase to some extent
because monthly price increases are averaged out over an extended period (12
months in some cases).  Furthermore, some state public utility commissions
(e.g. Connecticut) are conducting meetings with LDCs to discuss looking for
ways to lessen the impact of the projected increases. That being said, Nipsco
recently announced residential prices are expected to increase 50-60% this
winter over last winter (in line with the projection for Illinois).

If you are interested in a similar projection for other states, or have
comments with respect to the above let me know.


PWC - whose NDA is it?

Please exapnd to all VPs.

Thanks


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001 11:38 AM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 09:53 AM

		 To: Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Badeer/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Swerzbin/ENRON@enronXgate, Matt Motley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris H
Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: DWR Report Released today


Updates
Jennifer Burns - new cell phone number
Kathy McMahon - new executive committee assistant


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Cutaia/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
09:44 AM ---------------------------

veronica.gonzalez@pahou.panmail.com on 11/17/2000 01:39:51 PM
To: ANGIE.COLLINS@pahou.panmail.com, DIANE.FULLEN@pahou.panmail.com,
hugo.barron@pahou.panmail.com, jennifer.cutaia@enron.com,
LAURA.WESTBROOK@pahou.panmail.com
cc: LORAINE.HARWELL@pahou.panmail.com, MARY.DIAZ@pahou.panmail.com,
MAYRA.MALDONADO@pahou.panmail.com, micheal.sweeny@pahou.panmail.com,
phillip.alvardo@pahou.panmail.com

Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From:   lhahn@staffingprofessionals.net [SMTP:lhahn@staffingprofessionals.net]
Sent:   Friday, November 17, 2000 1:31 PM
To:   kcooper@staffingprofessionals.net
Cc:   connied@staffingprofessionals.net; laceyrcp@staffingprofessionals.net;
anthony@bures.com; DELacey@TLNA.COM; veronica gonzalez; DEBryant@TLNA.COM;
CSheffield@deepwater.com; OL991420@MSXSCC.SHELL.COM; tiffany odom
Subject:   FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE  READ!!!!

Linda Hahn
Staffing Professionals
8866 Gulf Freeway
Houston,Texas 77017
713-943-2727
713 -943-9880 fax
713-238-0447 pager

-----Original Message-----
From: Angela Denise McMillen [mailto:stdadm11@shsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:40 PM
To: Lynda Merchant; Shane Buckalew; RoseAnna McMillen; Phillip Mayfield;
Paula McGann; Mom and Dad; Marilyn Dougharty; Marie McMillen; Lisa Odom;
Julie Rawlinson; Jessica Clover; grandpa and grandma; Emily McDowell; DEBBIE
GARZA
Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Graham <jgraham@peoplepc.com>
To: <CJReed@aol.com>; DAVE ZENAIDA BOLES <dzboles11@aol.com>;
<RCL1962@aol.com>; <StagesRus@aol.com>; Nick Weber <njweber@home.com>; JON
GRAHAM <jgraham113@hotmail.com>; Harold Cosse <hcosse@jps.net>; Gallery
Photography <gallery@mhiconn.net>; Mike Harvey <mlharvey@micron.net>; JEFF
A. GRAHAM <jefnmgrt@msn.com>; DENNIS KIRK <foneman@peoplepc.com>; Dairy
<dairy@pintailpoint.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:08 PM
Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nolf, Bessie" <Bessie.Nolf@national-city.com>
To: <JGRAHAM@peoplepc.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:52 AM
Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tammy L. Reilman [mailto:kiowa@enter.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 5:05 PM
> To: ROBIN DOBOT
> Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maryann Mattson" <tedmar1@earthlink.net>
> To: "Nancy James" <nancyann@emeraldcoast.com>; "Joanne &George Provan"
> <Joprovan@cs.com>; "Julie Ann Hasslinger" <jamlinger@aol.com>;
> <Rustyaog@aol.com>; "Carol Addington" <jonniead@chibardun.net>; "Jeanne &
> Dick Sawicki" <sawickis@ticon.net>; "Jo Griffith"
> <jogriffith@earthlink.net>; "Ed Belcher"
<ebelcher@mail.santarosabeach.net>;
> "Eby Lundbeck" <ELundbeck@aol.com>; "marcene johnson"
<mjohnson@faegre.com>;
> "mike hasslinger" <mhasslinger@craig-hallum.com>; "Michelle Lloyd"
> <michellelloyd17@hotmail.com>; "Ken & Judy Webb" <CKenWebb@home.com>;
"Nancy
> Anderson" <nlclay@aol.com>; "Gerald Johnson" <gdjohnson@prodigy.net>
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 4:06 PM
> Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bugman" <crosby@gonelco.com>
> > To: "Angie" <abeaglemom@aol.com>; "Arine" <arine1002@aol.com>; "Chuck"
> > <cgest@aol.com>; "Claude" <Cnanon@home.com>; "Darren"
<dargil@ufsnet.com>;
> > "Donna" <dgorman@gateway.net>; "Dorothy" <scorpion110763@aol.com>; "Jim"
> > <jimmyg74@aol.com>; "Joe" <jkelly@gonelco.com>; "Joy" <jtrahan@aol.com>;
> > "Joyce" <joycew@aol.com>; "Lisa" <Bugdiver10@aol.com>; "Sylvia"
> > <sourwoodlabs@alltel.net>
> > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 6:04 PM
> > Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ROZICAGE5@aol.com [mailto:ROZICAGE5@aol.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 8:27 PM
> > To: DJAY@nlenx.com
> > Subject: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> > > >  > > > From: Debbie Nelson <nelsond@netnitco.net>
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > We have rented an email tracker for the next 3 months!
> > > >  > > > We at RH Power Inc. want to see how many people our
> > > >  > > > email can reach in this time!
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > If you forward this mail, you will be PAID MONEY!!!!
> > > >  > > > This email must be sent immediately upon receiving this
> > > >  > > > for it to be counted.
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > For every person you send this to you will receive I413!
> > > >  > > > For every person they send this to you will receive I139!
> > > >  > > > I too (Ryan LaGrange, Head Marketing Manager), thought
> > > >  > > > this was a hoax until I did the same this and the next month
> > > >  > > > got a check for I4612 in the mail!
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > *************************BONUS*******************************
> > > >  > > > IF YOU SEND THIS TO AT LEAST 15 PEOPLE RIGHT
> > > >  > > > AWAY, A I25 GIFT CERTIFICATE TO OUTBACK
> > > >  > > > STEAKHOUSE WILL POP UP ON YOUR SCREEN PRINT OUT
> > > >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
>


Thomas, if you have any questions, please call me at ext. 54858.

Thanks,

"Z"


DO YOU STILL OWE ME MONEY?  YOU BETTER BRING ME SOME GUMBO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sandra Hernandez" <sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sandra+20Hernandez+22+20+3Csandra+2Ehernandez+40crescentcom+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:47 PM
To:	Hernandez, Juan
Subject:	RE: visit

i'm not married or do I have kids.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan.Hernandez@enron.com [mailto:Juan.Hernandez@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:14 PM
To: sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com
Subject: RE: visit

SHE'S FLYING IN FRIDAY NIGHT
AND IF YOUR COMING TO VISIT YOU BETTER BE PREPARED TO CHANGE DIAPERS!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Sandra Hernandez" <sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sandra+20Hernandez+22+20+3Csandra+2Ehernandez+40cresce
ntcom+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:36 AM
   To:     Hernandez, Juan
   Subject:  RE: visit

   don't make me call mommy.  is she there yet?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Juan.Hernandez@enron.com [mailto:Juan.Hernandez@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:58 AM
   To: sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com
   Subject: RE: visit

   PAT YOU BETTER BACK OFF A SECOND.  YOU SHOULD BE ASKING NICELY IF YOU
   CAN
   COME VISIT.  TALK TO HAND!!!!

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Sandra Hernandez" <sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sandra+20Hernandez+22+20+3Csandra+2Ehernandez+40cresce
   ntcom+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:14 AM
      To:     Hernandez, Juan
      Subject:  visit

      is mommy in houston. i'm thinking about visiting her. what's the
   deal?

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Just FYI---we will NOT be mentioning Enron's name in the Allegheny Press
Release that each of you have approved. Per Allegheny's request, we are
deleting the sentence in the 1st paragraph which mentions that Las Vegas
Cogeneration II is owned by Southwest Power, an affiliate of Enron North
America. Everything else in the Press Release will stay the same.

Allegheny asked that Enron NOT be included in the release, as they feel we
have different approaches/philosophies in the marketplace, and they believe
it may send a mixed message. However, there is not any sort of
confidentiality agreement regarding the transaction, therefore we are
certainly free to talk about it publicly.

Please let me know if you have any questions and I apologize for the multiple
emails regarding this release--we just wanted everyone to be in the loop on
all the changes.

I have attached the FINAL Press Release for your files--this will be released
by Allegheny on Friday morning, 5/11.

Thanks,
Jennifer Walker
Enron Public Relations
x3-9964


Here are some thoughs on how we would account for the Offsystem Storage.

Facts
NNG moves 100,000 dts from physical inventory to Offsystem inventory. No accounting entry made to the G/L.
I will look into Form 2 physical reporting changes.

Offsystem inventory is reduced  2,000 dts to reflect in-kind fuel reduction.

Case 1	In-Kind is replaced by simple purchase from 3rd party, NNG incurrs the cost.
Debit 803 (Gas Purchases) or 858 (Fuel exp)		2,000 * cost of gas
	Credit A/P						2,000 * cost of gas

Case 1 books all transactions outside of operational storage.  Reducing the Offsystem storage will cause UAF to increase, however purchasing gas for Operational Storage and not recording it to Operational Storage will offset the UAF increase.

Case 2	In-kind is replaced by Operational Storage, NNG incurrs the cost
Debit 816 (Storage Fuel exp)		2,000 * MIP
	Credit 812 (Storage Fuel Credit)		2,000 * MIP

Debit 808 (Storage Withdrawal)		2,000 * MIP
	Credit 1174 (Encroachment)		2,000 * MIP

Case 3	In-kind is replaced by Operational Storage, Tracker incurrs the cost
Debit 816 (Storage Fuel exp)		2,000 * MIP
	Credit 812 (Storage Fuel Credit)		2,000 * MIP

Debit 808 (Storage Withdrawal)		2,000 * MIP
	Credit 1174 (Encroachment)		2,000 * MIP

Debit 1823 (Storage Fuel Tracker)	2,000 * MIP
	Credit 805 (Storage Fuel Recovery)	2,000 * MIP


avid (avid) adjective

   1. Having an ardent desire or unbounded craving; greedy.

   2. Marked by keen interest and enthusiasm.

[Latin avidus, from avere, to desire.]

   "Global Exchange, for instance, is an outfit of 40 people based in San
   Francisco, and an avid believer in street protest."
   Angry and effective, Economist, Sep 23, 2000.

A popular motivational saying goes, "Desserts is stressed spelled backwards."
This is an example of a reversible word, which when read from the right
yields another word. All of this week's words exhibit this quality. Just like
reversible clothing that changes pattern when worn inside out, reversible
words result in other usable words. A special case of reversible words are
palindromes, which spell the same when reversed. So palindromes are a subset
of reversible words which in turn are a subset of anagrams. Another name for
reversible words is semordnilap, a self-referential word coined by reversing
the word palindromes.

Some words coined in this manner have actually entered the dictionary. Here
are two examples: YOB (a rowdy youth), coined by reversing BOY, and MHO
(former unit of conductance), coined by reversing OHM, the unit of electrical
resistance.

Taking inspiration from the above desserts/stressed saying, can you coin a
pithy aphorism using some word and its semordnilap? Don your wordsmith hats
and send your gems to anu@wordsmith.org. Original entries only, please. I'll
publish selected ones here in a compilation next week. Here is a helpful
hint: you can elicit semordnilapic quality in many words by forming their
plural, past tense, etc. Also, semordnilaps are especially useful in creating
longer palindromic words. Here is a simple example, "Devil Dennis sinned,
lived." Can you come up with something more interesting? Email them to the
above address.                                                      -Anu

.............................................................................
All change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. -Ellen Glasgow,
novelist (1874-1945)

Q: Some time ago you featured a quote/word about x in AWAD. Could you resend
it?
A: You may search the archives at http://wordsmith.org/awad/search.html
   or browse them at http://wordsmith.org/awad/archives.html All the
   words and quotes since the beginning of AWAD are available there.

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/avid.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/avid.ram