Please find attached the PUCT order approving, with modifications, the ERCOT
Protocols.  What follows is a brief summary of many of the points that
directly affect the ERCOT market.  I will provide a complete summary and
timeline for response or request for rehearing on any of the issues later
this week.

Two of the most noticeable departures  from the Protocols was for the
Commission to ask for a review of the balanced schedule requirement and a
departure from the current bilateral market to an LMP type market.  The
Commission directed ERCOT to respond with the technical feasibility of
relaxing or eliminating the balanced schedule requirement.  The other
departure from the ERCOT protocols by the Commission is in reference to local
or intrazonal congestion.  The Commission states that if direct assignment of
the local congestion to the generating resources is not possible, they will
consider other market options such as an LMP model.  The Commission will
review both of these market concepts in September 2001.

The ERCOT Protocol Review Subcommittee will take the ordered protocols and
start the process of Protocol Revision.  Each of the revisions have been
assigned a completion date by the PUCT and can be found in schedule 4
attached.

The PUCT approved the ERCOT petition and Ordered the that the Protocols
should take effect June 1, 2001.  The Commission state that the Protocols are
fundamentally sound, however there are certain provisions that are boxed
(cannot take effect until the ERCOT system can accommodate them) as provided
for in the Protocol Implementation Plan.  ERCOT was directed to initiate a
process to implement the boxed provisions as soon as possible.  As for the
rest of the changed required by the PUCT, a timeline was attached for the
implementation of the protocol revisions.
Under the Protocols as filed, ERCOT had &sole discretion8 for its conduct,
however, the PUCT will require ERCOT to exercise its discretion in a
&reasonable, nondiscriminatory manner.8
Ancillary Services.  The Protocols require ERCOT to procure the following
Ancillary Services sequentially through an Auction:  regulation down,
regulation up, responsive reserves and non-spinning reserves.  The PUCT is
concerned that the process results in the possibility of price reversals
where the clearing price for some A/S may be higher than other higher grade
A/S services which may create incentives to game the system.  The PUCT
directed ERCOT to amend the Protocols such that it will procure A/S through
use of simultaneous optimization for assignment of resources to A/S products,
and will set prices for each A/S to the corresponding shadow price.  The PUCT
also ordered to ERCOT to amend the protocols such that it will use a two
settlement system for the procurement of A/S.  The day ahead period
procurement will settle and announce at 13:30 with the second to take place
during the adjustment period for each hour.  Until the system is capable of
the two-settlement system, ERCOT must amend the system to only allow downward
adjustment of prices for unselected A/S bids and allow unselected bids by a
QSE to be withdrawn only in descending order of bid prices.  The wrinkle here
is that the ERCOT system purges unselected bids and will require a manual
tracking of the bids.  A &spot check8 for the activity has been discussed.
Finally, ERCOT is to consider and report whether or not ERCOT should make
conditional selections of A/S bids (from a QSE portfolio) and then possible
deselect based on location and not price after the QSE resource plans are
published.
Market Solution.  Under the ERCOT protocols, a Market Solution for reducing
congestion exists when at least three unaffiliated resources have available
capacity and the ability to submit a bid to ERCOT to solve a circumstance of
local congestion and no one bidder is essential to solve the congestion.  The
PUCT would like the protocol amended to require that a &market solution8
exists only when at least three bids are received from unaffiliated resources.
Out of Merit Order (OOM) Service.  The PUCT directs ERCOT to use the same
ratcheting sown mechanism for out of merit order capacity payments to out of
merit order energy payments that are based on the 18,000 heat rates.
Reliability Must-Run Service.  The PUCT would like to have additional
incentives for generation entities to enter into RMR service contracts and
that once covered, the until will be efficiently utilized.  As such, ERCOT is
to amen the Protocols to give an RMR unit owner the additional option for
retaining 10% of net positive margins for energy generated in excess of the
amount that the unit is obligated to produce under its RMR contract.
Uninstructed Deviations.  In order to encourage &good price chasing8 and
discourage &bad price chasing,8 ERCOT was ordered to amend the Protocols to
apply the ex ante MCPE for balancing energy set ten minutes for the beginning
of a settlement interval to all instructed deployment of balancing energy
during the settlement interval and use the second subsequent interval ex
poste MCPE, which will be set five minutes after the end of the first
settlement interval, for uninstructed deviations during the first load
interval.
Bid Caps.  During the transition period, until July 4, 2004,  there shall be
a generation resource bid cap of $1,000 per MWh for energy that ERCOT
procures.  The bid cap does not apply to load resources.  ERCOT was also
directed to develop and submit for possible approval a bid cap on capacity
bids for generation resource offering to provide replacement reserve service.
Balance Schedule Requirement.  The current Protocols require QSEs submit a
balanced schedule, however, the PUCT intends to consider in September, 2001,
the policy implications of the balanced schedule requirement, and whether the
requirement should be relaxed or eliminated.  ERCOT was also directed to
report on the technical implications of relaxing or eliminating the balanced
schedule requirement.
Inter-zonal Congestion.  ERCOT shall amend the Protocols to convert to the
direct assignment of inter-zonal congestion costs, and base direct assignment
of inter-zonal congestion costs on an adjustable commercial model that
employs operational shift factors on the CSCs.  The Commission will also
require ERCOT to publish advisory updates or forecasts of the shift factors
corresponding to CSCs to reflect predicted operating conditions and
contingencies.  ERCOT's obligation to guarantee full zone-to-zone- congestion
cost insurance to those who acquire TCRs in proportions based on forecasted
shift factors, shall be eliminated.  The result of this is that a TCR
portfolio that provides a full hedge of inter-zonal congestion cost based on
the forecasted shift factors will not guarantee a full hedge against the
actual congestion charges.  The Commission does not like ERCOT to be in the
business of insuring transmission users against changes in shift factors.
The Commission also feels that &use-it-or-loose-it8 feature will result in
inefficient usage of the transmission system.  As such the Commission directs
ERCOT to amends the protocols to define TCRs as pure financial instruments
and eliminate &use it or loose it8.  As for the TCR Auction, a single round
combinatorial auction is more appropriate.  Bids can take the form of
price-quantity pairs for TCR portfolios or single TCRs.
Preassigned TCRs.  MOUs and Coops that own or have a long-term annual
capacity and energy commitment from a specific &remote8 generation resource
shall be preassigned TCRs.  Other Stakeholders argued that the preassigning
of TCRs reduces the amount available to the market and increases congest
costs borne by other market participants.  The Protocols, however, will be
changed to state that the preassigned TCRs are subject to change or
elimination at any time upon ERCOT Board of Directors approvals or Commission
Order.
Intrazonal Congestion.  ERCOT shall amend the Protocols to require direct
assignment in intrazonal congestion management costs through a usage fee
based on the flow over the congested intrazonal interfaces.  The usage fee
shall apply to the generation resources that cause the congestion fee.  The
net revenues from the usage fee shall be distributed, or credited against
uplift charges.  However, the Commission advises that to the extent feasible
under the zonal, portfolio-based model embodied in the Protocols, ERCOT shall
promptly notify the commission, so that the Commission can promptly consider
ordering the implementation of other alternative congestion management
methods, particularly locational marginal pricing.

Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or 8779688967@skytel.com

<<Timeline-Final Order1.ppt>>

 - 23220fo.doc
 - 23220fo, Attachment 5.xls
 - 23220fo, Attachment 6.xls
 - 23220fo, Attachment 7.doc
 - 23220fo, Attachment 8.doc


Instantly Get a Brand New AAA Credit Profile in 24 Hours!
 Here's How You Can Have a Brand New  Credit Profile in 24 Hours!  The Best Part is... It's 100% Legal, 100% Ethical, and Fully GUARANTEED!   Dear Friend, Do you have bad credit, judgements, bankruptcies or any other credit problems? Does it seem like your bad credit is holding you back from qualifying for a major credit card, car loan, or even a department store card?    Are you sick of the embarrassment of being rejected at your attempts to get any credit at all? If so... I've got some extremely good news for you.     I Will Show You Precisely How to Get a New, Separate, Clean  Credit File... and it will be Clear of Any Past Credit History!  And it's 100% LEGAL!   It doesn't matter, if you have judgements! It doesn't matter, if you've filed for bankruptcy! It doesn't matter, if you've been foreclosed! It doesn't matter, if you have a tax lien! It doesn't matter, if have been a slow payer in the past!  It Doesn't Matter, Because Your Credit File Will Be Completely  New And Completely Independent Of Any Negative Past File!  With my kit...within the next 60 days, you will quickly and easily  Get ALL Major Credit Cards  Learn Basic and Advanced Credit Billing Techniques  Get Bank Loans FAST and Simple  Get Mortgages NOW  Have AAA Credit on "Your Brand New File" in 30-60 Days  Get INSTANT Credit From Real Department Stores  Car Loans FAST and SIMPLE   And much, much more!    CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE!   This email was sent to you by Coconut Bay Marketing Services in full compliance with all existing and proposed email legislation. You may automatically remove yourself from any future mailings by clicking here.  The reply address on this email was active at the time this email was sent. Coconut Bay Marketing Services, SJO3016 PO Box 025216, Miami, FL 33102 tel:011-506-296-1109


pay only the $1750 referenced below to Robin Barbie from my book.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 12:12 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Robin Barbe                           02/08/2001 11:15 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: orgination

as i discussed today listed below is the trade that i would like orgination
granted on and a summary of the other
deal i spoke with you about.

bought 5000 dracut from hydroquebec sitara deal number 610884  purchase price
$6.10
sold      5000 dracut from conn nat           sitara deal number 610959
sell price            $6.45

orgination  $1750

additionally on a daily basis i attempt  to market  the tenn zone 5 above the
cng bid.
usually with success.
the production costs roughly 28 cents at current prices to move to cng.
today the cng two way  was 6.51 by 6.55.  i sold 5800  at $6.48 which is a
$6.76 cng equivalent or
.25 over the cng bid   or $1450

i can't try to forward sell this gas because we don't know on a forward basis
if we are going to have this gas.
i assume that this position would go into the cng position when the books are
broken out and i can't imagine that
scott will have the time try to market it.  thus if i am spending a
considerable amount of time in the morning trying to add
value to the desk with the illiquid assets that we have and i am successful,
then i feel that signficant quantifiable contributions
made to the desk should be recognized.


Yes, I will get with Becky Zikes and get her to send you one.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Davidson, Sara
Subject: CLE Form

Sara,  I had to leave S.A. early Friday and was unable to pickup a CLE form.
Can you send me one so I can get credit for the Thursday sessions.  Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joor, William E., III
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:29 AM
To: Dilg, Joe
Subject: FW: NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and
Distribution

William E. Joor III
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3600 First City Tower
1001 Fannin
Houston, Texas  77002-6760
Tel:  713-758-2582
Fax:  713-615-5201
wjoor@velaw.com

 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 The information in this email may be confidential and/or
privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual
or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an
authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its
attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the
sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Linn Miller [mailto:Michael.Linn.Miller@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 6:44 PM
To: J Mark Metts; Taylor, Mitchell (Enron); Amit Walia; Ceci Torn;
fstable@ei.enron.com; Sayre, C. Frank (Enron); fleite@enron.com; Lewis,
Jim C. (Enron); Young, Randy (Enron); Christodoulou, Diomendes (Enron)
Cc: Joor, William E., III; Alastair.maxwell@msdw.com;
Martin.arias@msdw.com; ramzi.nassar@msdw.com
Subject: NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and Distribution

As previously indicated.

MLM
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Linn Miller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/20/2000 06:48 PM ---------------------------

Ramzi.Nassar@msdw.com on 03/20/2000 03:28:23 PM

To:   Michael.l.miller@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and Distribution

(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc)(See
attached
file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc)

(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc)
(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc)

 - #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc
 - #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc


FYI.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 12:27
AM ---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman on 10/30/2000 04:56 PM
To: hhaltom@andrews-kurth.com
cc: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Don
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, fmackin@aol.com
Subject: Labor Issues response from Pat Mackin

I spoke with Pat Mackin regarding the two representations that I mentioned in
my Comments to the PSA.  For those that are copied on this email that did not
receive my comments, I have inserted the relevant language below:

 Labor Issues

1) Two different bidders made reference to different parts of Section 414 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  One was Section 414(t)
dealing with being treated as a &single employer8 with another party and the
other was Section 414(n) dealing with &leased employees.8  I have to assume
that the two are somehow related.  Is there something that we can concede in
this area to provide our bidders some level of comfort without increasing
Enron,s exposure??

According to Pat, the single employer representation (414(t)) should not be
added to any of the PSA's because the Peaker and the Pastoria LLCs do not
have any employees and ENA does not own more than 80% of LV CoGen.

The second representation regarding 414(n) and Leased Employees is a
representation that can be given by the Peaker and Pastoria LLCs (because the
LLCs have no employees and don't lease any employees).  It is unclear,
however, whether it is applicable to LV CoGen.  Ron/Andy would either of you
please let me know  whether LV CoGen "leases" any employees.  Pat suggested
that the HR person for LV CoGen should know.

Stuart


Stacey,
 I am sorry that you got involved.  The HPL group had already indicated that
they did not have the documents.


Sanjay will recommend this person for a VP new hire at a future ExComm
meeting.

 - JohnsonResumefinal.doc

Jeff McMahon: "Seems like a good candidate.  Would recommend hiring as VP
given experience level"

Mark Metts: Based on his evaluation "Mark would consider candidate as VP".

Joe Sutton: "Looks good to me - wealth of experience"


You asked for it, and we delivered!  ClickAtHome announces the addition of 4 new Internet Service Providers!

Introducing:  Sprint Broadband Direct, a new high-speed Internet solution based on an innovative technology called "fixed wireless", is now available for eligible Enron employees in 13 cities nationwide!
	Houston employees:  Sprint Broadband Direct will be in the Enron Building Lobby on Tuesday, July 31 and Wednesday, August 1 from 10am-2pm.  Get your questions answered regarding special ClickAtHome pricing, service, availability, or anything else!  ClickAtHome Reps will also be there to answer any program questions you may have.

For the North Houston area, Cox Cable and Charter Cable have been added.

And in Orlando, Florida, Time Warner's Roadrunner is now available through ClickAtHome!

Ready to place your order, or have questions regarding availability and pricing?
Visit http://clickathome.enron.com !

Stay tuned for more Internet Service partners this fall- ClickAtHome will continue to provide eligible Enron employees with high-speed Internet Service!

ClickAtHome helps you Get Innovative at Home!

If you are currently using another ClickAtHome Internet Service Provider and would like to switch, you may do so at any time.  You are responsible for any termination fees associated with cancellation.  ClickAtHome will subsidize only one provider per eligible employee.

For further information regarding switching providers:
-- visit clickathome.enron.com
-- click on the "SIGN ME UP" button
-- click on "Internet Options."


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 06:07 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/05/2000 02:12 AM

		 To: Kimberly Kupiecki <kkupiecki@arpartners.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Docs

Ok.  Here they are.  On exhibit A, I didn't touch numbers are exhibit #s.
Also, I deleted CAPM, since we ain't got anything yet.  And I deleted the
part that said "ticket sales taxes don't matter much," because now that we
have the numbers they could matter, cuz it's really tight between bond
payments and tax revs.  Anyway, that's it.  I checked and doubled checked the
numbers and exihibit #s in the exec sum, but you may want to give one last
peek.  Thanks SO much for pulling it together.

Best,
Jeff


Thanks, Don, I know you are having a rough morning. I know TVA and Ercot
have been gathered over the phone.

We have not gotten EES yet. IF you can send it that would be great,
otherwise I will call in for it a little later.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com
[mailto:owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com]On Behalf Of
Don.Baughman@enron.com
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Tradersnewsindexes@ipgdirect.com
Subject: EPMI traders news index

Attached is the CE & CIN index data.  EES, TVA and ERCOT were relayed
verbally.

Tnanks,
Don

(See attached file: 03_16_01 IPG INDEX REPORT.xls)


Shirley,

Any conflict?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
12:50 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
01/17/2000 09:57 AM
To: Thomas D Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jean Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi
Thuraisingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samer Takriti/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Amit's visit

Amit planning to spend the day of February 16th at Enron in order to give an
update on his bandwidth pricing research.    We will also try to spend some
time in more of a round-table discussion designed pick his brain on any other
related issues on which he may be able to help us.   I am corresponding with
Amit to set up a more detailed agenda.    Please let me know if there are
conflicts which should lead us to choose a different date.

Regards,
--Stinson


Here are this week's survey results.

AVG            -71
AVG w/o High & Low  -70
Median              -68
Standard Deviation    21
# of Responses        42
High           -165
Low            -12
Last Year           -175

Thank You!

George Ellis
BNP PARIBAS

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Mike come on up at 5:30 a.m.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Seely, Michael
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Hernandez, Juan; Will, Lloyd
Subject:

Lloyd / Juan

I have confirmed with my current boss that I will be available to start with you guys on Aug. 13.  Let me know if there is anything I need to do prior to that date.  Please let me know what time I need to show up next Monday.  Thanks, and I look forward to working with you.

Thanks,

Michael Seely
Global Wholesale Markets
Enron Broadband Services
EB4456E
Direct - 713 853-1404
Cell - 713 775-6463
Fax - 713 646-8795
Michael_Seely@enron.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

January 5, 2001 5:00pm through January 8, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  3:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at  1:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at  9:30:00 PM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London
Outage:  move 2 tape libraries in EB34 Data Center
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Create space for other project
Backout: if the new location poses problems, move them back to original
location.
Contact(s):  Michael Barber  713-853-5530

EDI SERVER:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:   ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  CORP      POSTPONED
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  2:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  10:00:00 AM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: To increase production and development reliablility and stability.
Backout: We will revert back to current version if upgrade is unsuccessful.
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves     713-345-3798  877-499-0610
  Larry Robinson  713-853-5956  713-284-3554

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at     8:30:00 PMPT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Moving user segment 5thFloor off Core Router
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose: Trying to remove all IPX off of Cisco 3 to free up move processing
memory
Backout:
Contact(s):  George Nguyen  713-853-0691

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at     8:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Cluster Bounce
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: The drives on this cluster have been failing over on their own,
which is causing lose of connection to users H: drives and some directories
on the O: drive.
Backout: We will evauate whether the previous version of the backup agent
will work on one server, then proceed to the second server. Either way both
servers need to be bounced, in order to keep the drives from failing over on
their own.
Contact(s):  Frank Coles    (713)406-0470

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Sat 1/6/2001 at  2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Re-enable ENA-CX4-ARD
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose:   So that the NT ans UNIX development boxes can be
redundant
Backout:
Contact(s):  George Nguyen  713-853-0691

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


The usual payment terms of PDVSA are 30 days after bill of lading.  We should
pay Enron, who is our seller, 30 days after bill of lading plus monthly
adjustments accordingly to market index movement.  We are better protected by
paying as we did on the last cargo.  We should follow Paul's recommendations
which are being discussed with Suzanne and her group.

Our cash flow forecast shows that we will be short by $800M depending on the
market index movements and after paying $397M of import tax, $156M of rent
and $164M of property tax.

Saludos

Paul Y'Barbo@ENRON
05/04/2001 04:10 PM
To: Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron
cc: Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Javier
Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Next Cargo

If we worked out a price structure similar to the last cargo, we could
eliminate the price risk by paying the following for the LPG:

1400 MT at a Fixed Price (represents amount borrowed that went to April sales)
2900 MT based on May Mont Belvieu plus Premium 1
2800 MT based on June Mont Belvieu plus Premium 2 and
2900 MT based on July Mont Belvieu plus Premium 3

The Fixed Price for 1400 MT and the Premiums 1,2, and 3 are under discussion
with Suzanne. This structure matches the cost of product with ProCaribe's
sales revenue.

Question: How does ProCaribe get paid for the 15 days of product that goes
with the Progasco sale?

Paul

Greg Curran
05/04/2001 02:45 PM
Sent by: Greg Curran
To: Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg
Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico
Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Next Cargo

Please explain how we will manage the price risk on this.  Remeber that we
have to give 15 days worth of product with the sale of  Progas.  What are the
payment terms?  How are you with cash?

Miguel Maltes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/04/2001 02:12 PM
To: Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico
Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Next Cargo

Our next cargo has a loading window in PDVSA on May 18, 2001, with an ETA in
ProCaribe on May 19 - 21, 2001.  The cargo is for 10,000 Mts. (5.2MM gallons)
at MB + 7 three days around bill of lading.  This means that the invoice will
be the average price of MB on the loading day, the day before and the day
after, excluding weekends and holidays, plus 7 cents a gallon.

The following are the monthly sales average per customer:

* Progasco  1,100,000 gallons
* San Juan Gas     210,000 gallons
* Centro Gas                  140,000 gallons

Total borrowing return to EcoEl,ctrica 3,200 Mts or 1,667,200 gallons on
5/19/01.

After returning all the borrowing (5/19/01) we have a balance of 3,480,233
gallons.  The following are the estimated sales and heater consumption per
month:

* May (12 days)    563,520 gallons (from May 20th through May 31st)
* June (30 days)  1,408,800 gallons
* July  (31 days)  1,455,760 gallons

Inventory balance as of: 7/31/01 (52,153 gallons).

Next cargo arrival delivery window July 20 - 31, 2001.

Saludos


Chris,

Nancy and Mary took the budget news well.  Their response was "I don't care
what the number is as long as the sponsors are stepping up for it."
Frank also did not object.  Unfortunately, they are saying that the CCT/CUST
interconnection issue must be resolved before funding.  Their concern is that
if we sign then EPE will be subject to third party liability with members of
the grid.  They are willing to meet with us next week on the budget and the
ECA but Cliff is not availble until Thursday.  Can you make it later in the
week?

I'll keep you posted.

"Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF" <Chris.M.J.Dutton@SI.shell.com> on 12/05/2000
07:54:40 PM
To: "'Blanca.Bollom@enron.com'" <Blanca.Bollom@enron.com>,
"'Rob.G.Gay@enron.com'" <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY

Rob,
I will be in a meeting most of the day but do call as it sounds urgent.  My
office line is redirected to my cell phone.

> Regards,
>
> Chris Dutton, GPBF
>
> Finance Adviser
> Shell International Gas Limited
> Shell Centre London SE1 7NA
> Tel: +44 207 934 6110
> Fax: +44 207 934 7515
> Mobile: +44 7884 475053
> E-Mail: Chris.M.J.Dutton@SI.SHELL.COM
>
>
>
> ----------
> From:  Blanca.Bollom@enron.com[SMTP:Blanca.Bollom@enron.com]
> Sent:  05 December 2000 19:58
> To:  Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF
> Subject:  CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY
>
> Chris:
>
> Rob wanted me to let you know to expect a call from him tomorrow,
> Wednesday, about 8:00 a.m. (2:00p London).
>
> Blanca
>


Can you please put this counterparty in profile manager for me.  We had a
really old ERMS Master that restricted the types of financial products they
could trade under it, and I want to take a look and see what we've got them
approved for.  They should be able to trade any financial products now.
Thanks!


The Federal Appeals Court issued a ruling today on the EPA Section 126 Rule.  We need to get more legal analysis of the order, but it
states:

"It is Ordered that EPA's Section 126 Rule is remanded as to all cogenerators, but vacated only as to those cogenerators classified as electric generating units ("EGUs") under the rule that supply equal to or less than one third of their potential capacity or equal to or less than 25 MW to the grid for sale per year."   This part of the order appears to "vacate" or completely throw out the 126 rule for cogeneration units less than 25 MW or selling less than 1/3 of their capacity to the grid.   For all other cogenerators, the court remands the rule for all other cogenerators to EPA for re-working, consistent with some of the court's earlier objections.

"It is Further ordered that as of May 15, 2001, the date of this court's decision, the three-year compliance period for emissions limitations applicable to EGUs under the Section 126 Rule is tolled, pending EPA's resolution of the remand of EGU growth factors ordered by this court."  This more significant part of the order "tolls" -- or puts on hold -- compliance with the 126 Rule for all EGUs until EPA resolves EGU growth factor issues that the court identified in its May 15, 2001 ruling.  The practical effect of this part of the order will be to delay implementation of the Section 126 Rule until May 2004, when the EPA NOx SIP Call is scheduled to go into effect.   The EPA will not be able to re-issue its rules in a time frame that would require compliance before May 2004.

The NOx SIP Call would have supplanted the Section 126 Rule in May 2004 anyway -- what this ruling does is take away some of the uncertainty that existed for the May to September 2003 period (original effective date of the Section 126).  The initial impact that could result is that prices for 2003 OTR allowances could be lower, now that less of the generating sector in fewer states will be facing summer 2003 compliance.

Again, I will forward any more detailed legal analysis as I receive it, but this is the latest news...

Please call if you have any questions.

Jeff Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
(203) 245-0828 office
(203) 464-1541 cell


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 09:08
AM ---------------------------

"DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com> on 04/09/2001
10:56:45 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@Enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>, "'JKeffer@KSlaw.com'"
<JKeffer@KSlaw.com>
cc: "'Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com'" <Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com>,
"Kahn, Marguerite R." <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Turbine Purchase Transaction  Documents

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/09/01 21:43:48
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

Attached for your review are initial drafts of  the following documents:

???????????  - Assignment and Assumption Agreement, with GE Acknowledgement;

???????????  - NorthWestern Guarantee issued to?GE (if necessary); and

???????????  - ENA Promissory Note (issued by Turbine LLC).

Also attached?are clean and blacklined  copies of the revised?NorthWestern
Guaranty issued to ENA.?

Please contact me with any?questions or  comments regarding the attached
documents.
************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker  LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:???? (212)  319-4090
?
?
 - Assignment Agreement(v1).DOC
 - Guarantee - Northwest GE(v2).WPD
 - promissory note(v1).WPD
 - NW Agreement Guaranty(v2).WPD
 - NW Agreement Guaranty(vRED).WPD


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041804.txt


***************************************************************
This advertisement has been sent to you by TheStreet.com
because you are currently or within the last year have
been a subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of
our web sites, www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com.
If you are not a current or former subscriber, and you
believe you received this message in error, please forward
this message to members@thestreet.com, or call our customer
service department at 1-800-562-9571.  Please be assured
that we respect the privacy of you, our subscribers, and
that we have not disclosed your name or any other information
about you to the advertiser or any other third party.

*****************************************************************
Tech Stock Alert, April 30, 2001

Dear Fellow Investor,

Where IS the NASDAQ headed next? Will Greenspan's latest rate cut
yesterday finally be the trigger for the market to take off? Will
the hundreds of technology stocks that crashed and burned in 2000
EVER make a comeback? Is the Bush Administration good--or bad--for
the stock market?

These are the crucial questions facing all investors today.
Problem is--nobody's got ANY concrete answers.

As a result, the market continues to flounder in no-man's land,
up one day and down the next. And investors, shaken from last year
and afraid of what could lie ahead, have adopted that classic 'wait
and see' attitude.

And THAT'S what gives us the FANTASTIC OPPORTUNITY we have today. My
name is Michael Murphy, and I've been analyzing and investing in
technology stocks for over 30 years. This is what I want to tell you
today: While everyone else sits on the sidelines, smart investors who
know--and act on--the five things you CAN count on in 2001 have an
unprecedented opportunity to profit--big time.

Let me show you what these five critical pieces of information are:

1. Biotech is the Next Big Thing in technology, and anyone who plans
on being in the stock market for more than 10 minutes MUST own a piece
of it today. Last year alone, the AMEX Biotech index was up a whopping
62% and my Technology Investing clients made over 100% returns with
select biotech stocks. But, mark my words, now that Celera published
the entire human genome sequence in Science magazine this past February,
the stocks will soar to previously unimagined heights.

2. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has proven that he will do
EVERYTHING in his power to avoid recession in 2001. Since January
alone, he has made four separate, significant interest rate cuts
and it's painfully obvious Greenspan doesn't want to be blamed for
sending the economy into a tailspin.

3. The big technology companies will bounce back FIRST. After a year
like 2000 investors are in no mood to make bets on small, unproven
stocks. They still want to profit from the fastest-growing industries--
but they want to do it more safely by buying the big, profitable
companies. The proof is in the pudding: in January alone my Technology
Investing readers raked in 31% on the dominant industry leaders we
loaded up on--at huge discounts--at last year's end.

4. Technology will continue to grow at four to five times the rate
of the Old Economy -- even this year. Despite what you're hearing in
the media, market researchers are projecting PC sales growth of at
least 11%, semiconductor revenues up 10%, cell phone sales jumping
12%-25% and a leap in most end-user consumer products of 10%-15%.

5. There's a monstrous BUYING PANIC coming. It will either make you
rich... or bury you alive. Once investors realize where technology
is really headed in 2001 and beyond, there's going to be a MAD DASH
to pile back into the stocks as quickly as possible. Most investors
will be too late, and they'll wind up kicking themselves once again
as they miss most of the NEXT BIG RUN UP. Don't let that happen to you.

We've been through this before--in 1974, 1994 and most recently in 1998.
Last time, my readers and I loaded up on a handful of the world's most
dominant technology companies at crazy-cheap prices . . . and we made
a killing. Twelve short months later we were up an astounding 157%.

I never thought it possible, but we now have an amazing opportunity to
do it all over again. Please, I implore you, make the most of it.  To
find out the names of the 5 technology stocks I,m advising my clients
to load up on here, visit
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0AK194 and sign up for
my just-released FREE REPORT, "5 Technology Stocks Every Investor Must
Own--BEFORE the Coming Buying Panic."  You,ll be glad you did.

**************************************************************

This advertisement has been supplied by a third party and
has been sent to you by TheStreet.com for informational
purposes only.  We are not responsible for and have not
independently authenticated in whole or in part the
accuracy of the information provided in the advertisement.
No such information should be relied upon without consulting
the advertiser.  This advertisement does not imply and
endorsement by us.

TheStreet.com, Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer
or an investment adviser either with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory
authority.  No information on any of the Sites or dissemination of
advertising material is intended as securities brokerage, investment,
tax, accounting or legal advice by us, as an offer or solicitation
by us of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation
or sponsorship of any service, newsletter, company, security, or fund.
We cannot and do not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy
or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of
any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or
informational source.  You bear sole responsibility for your own
investment research and decisions, and should seek the advice of a
qualified securities professional before making any investment or
purchase of investment advice. Any sale or purchase of products or
services, or of securities or ownership interest that results from
information presented on the Sites or disseminated in advertising
material will be on a negotiated basis between the parties without
any additional participation by or remuneration to TheStreet.com, Inc.

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers
from us in the future, please click here
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=A

To view our privacy policy,
please click here:  http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
***********************************************************************


June 9, 2000

     Teco Tap       22.500 / Enron ; 38.750 / HPL IFERC

     Texoma         5.833 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK IC       11.667 / Enron

June 10, 2000

     Teco Tap       41.250 / Enron

June 11, 2000

     Teco Tap       40.000 / Enron ; 50.000 / HPL IFERC


The following is a copy of the May Option Payment Calendar.  Please compare
with your records and let me know you have any comments, additions or
deletions to the May Calendar:


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron on 08/22/2000
04:09 PM ---------------------------

"JOANNE RUTKOWSKI" <JRUTKOWS@LLGM.COM> on 08/22/2000 02:47:45 PM
To: <Dwight.Larson@enron.com>, <J_Mark_Metts@enron.com>,
<Mitchell.Taylor@enron.com>, <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>, "DOUGLAS HAWES"
<DWHAWES@LLGM.COM>
cc:

Subject: SEC Timing

Mark and Dwight,

You've asked us to outline a strategy for getting the SEC order by year-end.

The first issue is to get rid of the intervenors.  If we can tell the SEC
staff that we are settling with TANC and SMUD and the Nevada Commission, we
can ask them to focus again on the substantive issues.

As you know, there are two major issues: (i) the integration, which we
believe we have more or less under control, and (ii) the capital structure of
the resulting system, which is dependent in the first instance on the timing
of the Sierra auction.

Concerning integration, the question is whether Sierra's "blended approach"
(that is, a 50 MW long-term firm path between PGE and Nevada Power and a
combination of nonfirm and short-term firm linking Sierra to the rest of the
system) is beyond current SEC precedent.  In AEP and Xcel, the SEC found that
a long-term firm path was sufficient to establish that two parts of a system
were "physically interconnected or capable of interconnection."  Although
Xcel also involved the use of a nonfirm path, that was on an interim basis,
pending the completion of certain upgrades necessary for the firm contract
path.  Absent some statement to the contrary, it is our understanding that
the staff would not approve the "blended approach" by delegated authority.

There is, however, an alternative approach to integration under which we
would ask the SEC staff to find that PGE and Nevada were integrated and that
Sierra constituted a permissible "additional" system under the (A)(B)(C)
clauses of Section 11(b)(1).  Sierra has completed the studies needed to
justify this approach.  Based on conversations with Bob Wason and Cathey
Baker on the SEC staff, we believe that this approach could be approved by
delegated authority.

Concerning the capital structure of the resulting system, there is a
perception on the part of the staff that Sierra is significantly
overextended.  As you know, the SEC generally requires registered holding
companies to maintain a minimum of 30% common equity.  While there is
precedent to support a floor of 27.6%, the staff has advised companies that
they will require a minimum of 28.5% equity, with a commitment to reach 30%
within  a reasonable period of time, before approving a matter pursuant to
delegated authority.

There is some confusion about Sierra's prospects in this regard.  The most
recent amendment, filed June 14th, indicates that Sierra will be at 20.8%
common equity at closing, with a representation that Sierra will increase its
consolidated common equity to approximately 29 percent as a result of: (a)
proceeds from the sale of generating assets of Sierra Pacific and Nevada
Power aggregating approximately $1 billion, 100 percent of which will reduce
debt of the consolidated company; (b) proceeds from divestiture of non-core
assets, or some combination of common equity and divestiture of non-core
assets, which together would be approximately equivalent to the issuance of
$260 million in terms of impact on Sierra Pacific's equity ratio; (c)
issuance of up to $600 million of hybrid securities; and (d) increased
retained earnings realized from the combined operations of Sierra and PGE
aggregating approximately $80 million in 2000 and $100 million in 2001.

It is unclear how good these numbers are.  They do not, for example, reflect
Sierra's second quarter earnings release or the effect of a writeoff in
connection with PGE's Trojan Plant.
Bill Weeden will be meeting with Mark Ruelle Thursday to come up with "firm"
numbers.

In other matters, the SEC staff has indicated that it would give "credit"
toward equity capitalization if the company has executed definitive
agreements for sale of the subject assets, such as the Sierra water business
and its generation assets.  It is important to know when such sales may be
announced so that we can factor them into our calculations.

Assuming that Sierra can establish, based on these types of definitive
agreements, that the merged company will be at 28.5% (once the underlying
sales close) and Nevada has indicated that it will withdraw its intervention
and Oregon has indicated that it will approve the merger, we would be in a
position to meet with the SEC staff and ask for a year-end order based on our
ability to settle with the California intervenors.

Bill said he will call me Thursday after his meetings or Friday at the latest.

Best,

Joanne


Are you Ready2Go ?

Have you ever experienced problems accessing the network remotely when traveling on business or when trying to work from home on your Enron laptop?  Would you like someone to test and customize the dial-up access on your laptop before you head out of town on your next trip?

We have identified a need and are now supplying a new service for Corp and EBS employees and it's called Ready2Go !

This new service has been established to test, modify, and update the dial-up software on your laptop.

How it works:

A calendar has been created on ITCentral at <http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Services/Ready2Go>

Go to the site and schedule a time that is convenient for you. Then, bring your laptop to our testing site, (either at 3AC105 or EB2268D).  We will examine your system, update your software (if needed) and even customize it for the next location you will be traveling to.  We'll also provide a training session in accessing the network remotely with your laptop.

If you are interested in participating, simply access the web site and schedule an appointment.

Thank you for your time.
The Ready2Go Team


After reading this I am wondering how we modeled Fronterra for testing.

Anyone know?

Thanks,

Smith Day
---------------------- Forwarded by Smith L Day/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 11:11
AM ---------------------------

"Greg Graham" <greg.graham@lcra.org> on 05/15/2001 08:17:48 AM
To: <mockmarket@ercot.com>
cc: <Pmoast@ercot.com>, "James Hamann" <James.Hamann@lcra.org>, "Jill
Traffanstedt" <jill.traffanstedt@lcra.org>, "Jim Gleitman"
<Jim.Gleitman@lcra.org>, "Steven Schultz" <SSchultz@lcra.org>
Subject: Fwd: FW: Generator unit consolidation

See attached EMail from John Adams:

If this approach to Combined Cycle Plants (separate Resource ID's for each GT
and ST) is of concern to you, please let your client rep  and John Adams
know. This approach leads to multiple resource id's for plants that are in
many cases managed at a plant level...not "unit" level as this approach
implies. The burden to submit resource plans at the component level and the
possibility of receiving a Unit Specific deployments, along with the
proliferation of resource id's (many of these plants are owned by multiple
entities...leading to even more resource id's) points out that different
solution is needed. Greg Graham ggraham@lcra.org

Received: from hood.lcra.org by lcuuser.lcra.org; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:38:22
-0600
Received: from wrangell.lcra.org (wrangell.lcra.org [198.214.247.194]) by
hood.lcra.org (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09342 for
<greg.graham@int-mail.lcra.org>; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:38:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.ercot.com (mail.ercot.com [65.67.37.83]) by
wrangell.lcra.org with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.1) id TAA19016 for
<greg.graham@lcra.org>; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:38:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <KFRNP4FC>;
Mon, 14 May 2001 19:38:46 -0500
Message-ID: <C9295233C0E3D3119214009027E52EF0A0A429@MAIL>
From: "Adams, John" <JAdams@ercot.com>
To: "Northcutt, Robert" <RNorthcutt@ercot.com>
Cc: "Kessler, Amy" <AKessler@ercot.com>,        "Boecker, Arthur"
<ABoecker@ercot.com>,        "Trinh, Thong" <TTrinh@ercot.com>, "Cohea,
James"  <JCohea@ercot.com>,        "Boecker, Arthur"
<ABoecker@ercot.com>,        "Myers, Steven" <SMyers@ercot.com>,
"Graham, Greg" <greg.graham@lcra.org>,        "Donohoo, Ken"
<KDonohoo@ercot.com>,        "Tamby, Jeyant" <JTamby@ercot.com>,
"Saathoff, Kent" <KSaathoff@ercot.com>
Subject: FW: Generator unit consolidation
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:38:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0DCD7.6616BF20"

Robert

There has been considerable discussion and argument over the need of the
security applications to have each unit described in the model uniquely to
allow

the stability applications to work properly.

Operations has argued strongly that every unit over a size (20 mw) has got to
be modeled for the stability analysis modules to work.

I understand that every unit modeled in registration MUST have a
corresponding ( one to one) entry in the network model.?

As I understant it, this leads to the following chain where the symbol =>
means "requires"

Operations needs all synchronous units > 20 MW? modeled & telemeter=>
All units over 20 MW must be registered uniquely (elements of combined cycle
plants registered uniquely)?? Consequence of Design

All units must be settled matching the registration database =>
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Consequence of Design

All resource plans must be submitted for each unit of a Combined Cycle unit
=>
Jointly owned Combined Cycle units must submit resource plan items for each
owner of each unit of a Combined Cycle plant for each scheduling period =>

A combined cycle plant with 6 units and 3 owners results in 6 * 3 * 96
entries per day.

I understand many QSE's are balking at this requirement as burdensome and
un-necessary. (LCRA, OXY,etc)

We also have a problem with modeling of MANY MANY very small resources to get
them into the settlement system.

It occurs to me that the Operations Requirement is NOT that the individual
units be settled separately, or scheduled separately.? Only that they be
modeled separately and telemetered separately.

Why can't we have a single entry in the settlement system map to many units
in the network model, and conversely have many entries in the settlement
system (many small units) map to a single, or even NO entry in the network
model?

Why can't we break the link between unit registration and the network model??
or at least modify it?? Or do I mis-understand the situation?

Please let me know if my understanding of the situation is correct or correct
me if I misunderstand.? I would appreciate suggestions on how to improve the
situation.

?-----Original Message-----
From: ? Kessler, Amy?
Sent:?? Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:11 AM
To:???? Kessler, Amy; 1 Client Service Reps; Adams, John; Boecker, Arthur;
Trinh, Thong; Bian, Jessica; Donohoo, Ken; Cohea, James

Subject:??????? RE: Generator unit consolidation

The meeting will be Friday, May 11 at 9:30 in the small conference room in
the blue building.

?-----Original Message-----
From: ? Kessler, Amy?
Sent:?? Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:49 PM
To:???? 1 Client Service Reps; Adams, John; Boecker, Arthur; Trinh, Thong;
Bian, Jessica; Donohoo, Ken
Subject:??????? Generator unit consolidation

Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss the following topics:
Gen. unit consolidation (generation units of less than 20 mW)
Gen. unit consolidation (generation units of 20mW or greater from PUCT SGC
certificated resource entity)
Gen. units behind a large industrial meter (PUCT SGC certification)
Network model names for new resources

The meeting will be held at the small conference room in the blue building at
9:30.
If you are not able to attend, please send someone in place.?

Thanks,
Amy Kessler
EMS Team
512-248-3163


Susan, you asked about Texas during our telephone conversation.  I should
mention that Texas has a statute that prohibits demanding or selling at an
excessive price such things as fuel, food and medicine if the Governor has
declared a disaster, which I assumed didn't fit our scenario.  I didn't see
anything in the Texas case law but it was a quick look.


Let me know your thoughts after you speak with him.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeffrey A Shankman on 08/03/2000 09:25 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Craig is coming by today to pitch a few ideas.  I'll let you know what he
comes up with (or if you'd like to be present when he does, let me know and
I'll get it on your calendar).  Do you have any preliminary ideas?

On another note, last night was a great idea, and I think it went a long
way.  Thanks for the intro to the group.

Thanks
Jeff

David W Delainey
08/02/2000 06:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Jeff, we are thinking about how to finish the mid-market iniative and I need
to know if you want Breslau.  I would like him in a singular role and
accountability so I need to plan to incorporate him or not depending on if
you want him.

Regards
Delainey


Note:  If you haven't been migrated to Windows 2000 yet, these password requirements don't currently apply to you.  But since you'll be migrating within the next few weeks, please be familiar with the following....
Keeping Your Mailbox Clean
Since we have a 100MB limit on the size of our mailbox, it's important to practice good housekeeping and keep it as clean as possible. If you don't, you'll eventually receive the following message:
You have exceeded the storage limit on your mailbox.  Delete some mail from your mailbox or contact your system administrator to adjust your storage limit.

You'll then be unable to send messages until you get below the 100MB limit. Ouch!  (note:  mailbox limits will only be adjusted for specific business reasons)
So how do we practice good housekeeping and keep our mailbox clean? There are several tools to help you do this:
Use Your Inbox as a To-do List
Gone are the days when we could just read the new messages in our Inbox and then leave them there for future reference. You'll now need to keep that Inbox "lean-n-clean" to avoid the dreaded message above. When a new message comes in, deal with it right way. If it's just for your information, read it, then delete. If it's got information that you'd like to reference later, move it to a "save" folder that you've created. If it's someone asking for information, reply, then delete it. If a new message requires action on your part, leave it in the Inbox until you can then deal with it - Reply, forward, move, delete!. An empty Inbox is a happy one!
How Big are Those Messages?
When you were migrated, a column called "Size" was added to your Inbox, Deleted Items, and Sent Items folder views. This field shows exactly how much space each message is taking up (including any attachments). To quickly see the messages that are taking up the most space in each of those folders, simply click on the column header "Size" and the message list will be sorted based on the size of each message. The biggest messages will then be displayed first, and you can determine what to do with them. Should you just delete a message? Save the attachment to your H: drive?...etc.
If you'd like to add the Size column to any folders you've created, click the link below to access the instructions for modifying your columns.
How Big is Your Mailbox?
To check on the total size of your mailbox, right-click on Outlook Today (at the top of the Outlook Bar or Folder List), and select Properties. Then click the Folder Size... button. The total size of your mailbox is then displayed, along with a breakout of each of the individual folder sizes. Now you know where to concentrate your attention when cleaning up.

To see all the training tips developed so far, just click on the following link and then select Open...
\\gtoma-dv01\common\win2000_training\index.htm

If you have additional questions, please contact the Help Desk.  Thanks!

:______
  Tyler A Theobald
      ETS Omaha IT
      402-398-7247
Help Desk: 402-398-7454
__________________________________________________________________________


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Plus                             7 other reasons to shop  early

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

8.

FREE                             SHIPPING on all  orders over $100, through
November                             22.
?

7.

We've                             teamed  up with Toysrus.com  to offer you
toys and savings so massive, even  our                             North Pole
competitors are envious.
?

6.
Create                           a Wish List      at Amazon.com and you just
might win everything on  it--up                           to $5,000. Woo-hoo!
?
5.
By                           shopping early at  Amazon.com,  you eliminate
stress. Carolers won't seem nearly  as                           irritating.
?
4.
Though                           reindeer are  cute, our delivery service is
more reliable.                           And  no fog delays.
?
3.
                           You can browse through all 17 of our  stores
without                           being accosted by a persistent  perfume
sales clerk.
?
2.
                           Free parking.
?
1.
SHIPPING                           IS FREE on  orders of $100 or more. (Our
Head Elf made                           us say  that again.)

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

For the Fine               Print follow the  links below:

Wish List        Contest Rules

Free Shipping               Offer

We hope  you               enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd
rather  not receive               future e-mails of this sort from
Amazon.com,  please visit your Amazon.com     account page and under the Your
Account Settings heading,  click               the "Update your communication
preferences" link.

Please   note that this message was sent to the  following e-mail address:
ebass@enron.com


Daren---

I need some help with meter 5892 for September 00 due to a feedback error.
Deal 133196 (purchase from Duke on gathering contract) is erroring out due to
it's expiration date of 8/31/00......however it still showed up in POPS (w/o
a nom) on 9/1.  Volume management allocated volume to it according to the
allocation statement.  Should this deal be extended?  I noticed it is not out
there for October either.  I have the feedback error sheet & allocation if
you want to see them.

Let me know,

Mark
x33396

p.s. Fred Boas said you used to handle this and you were very wise in the art
of allocation......so I am expecting big results Grasshopper!


There is a new Regions folder out there for 2002.  Just to remind you even if you havent been updating your book, because your P&L hasn't changed, you need to make sure that you have rolled it and that their is no P&L for the new month or for the daily.

-Thomas


Nope.  Gosh, the suspense nearly killed me!!!

	Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 02:16 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: O'Ryan Power Holding

Good Afternoon Tana,

 Is O'Ryan Power Holding (formerly Duquesne Light Company) in the process of
setting up an ISDA ?

Thanks for you assistance.

T. Mandola


As most of you know, I will be out of the office from this Wednesday at 11:30
a.m. through Friday, July 28,2000.  I am attaching a listing of pending
projects showing status of completion.  While I believe all is under control,
I am leaving you the attached in case you need to find any documents in my
files for further action prior to my return.  Everything that I have pending
is located in the hanging files by the window, under one of the following
subject headings:

Storage
Transmission
Offshore
Assets
Third Party Transport

Pat should be able to help find anything you need in my files (computer and
physical).

Thanks for your help.

Steve