---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------
YVONNE ACOSTA @
ENRON
04/14/2000 03:02 PM

To: LORENA.LUNA1@HALLIBURTON.COM, Noemi
Camacho/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: [FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......]]

---------------------- Forwarded by Yvonne Acosta/Corp/Enron on 04/14/2000
02:59 PM ---------------------------

Regina Blackshear
04/14/2000 02:35 PM
To: yacosta@enron.com, vblack4538@aol.com, l_carter61@hotmail.com,
sonia_l_castorena@reliantenergy.com, Amber.Ebow@enron.com, Tammy Green
<tcgreen@flash.net>, GRHRDH@aol.com, rhondamjordan@hotmail.com, "BENEDICT
PETERS"<bouncing98@hotmail.com>, rosemary.a.reynolds@usa.xerox.com,
"WhiteBL(Barbara)"<BLWhite@equiva.com>
cc:

Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: [FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......]]

---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron on
04/14/2000 02:33 PM ---------------------------

jacelyne hill <yellowgirlhill@netscape.net> on 04/14/2000 01:50:50 PM
To: KBROWN@LERETA.NET, MALEXANDER@LERETA.NET, REGINA.BLACKSHEAR@ENRON.COM,
HENDERSON HENRY S A1C 347 MDG/SGOM <HENRY.HENDERSON@MOODY.AF.MIL>
cc:

Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: [FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......]]

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
Received: from rly-na04.mx.aol.com [205.188.158.41] by mx09 via mtad (2.6)
with ESMTP id 278eDmTSz0857M09; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:44:51 GMT
Received: from  www0v.netaddress.usa.net (www0v.netaddress.usa.net
[204.68.24.51]) by rly-na04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2000
15:44:45 -0400
Received: (qmail 10735 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Apr 2000 19:44:44 -0000
Message-ID: <20000413194444.10734.qmail@www0v.netaddress.usa.net>
Received: from 204.68.24.51 by www0v for [163.188.57.137] via
web-mailer(M3.3.1.96) on Thu Apr 13 19:44:44 GMT 2000
Date: 13 Apr 00 12:44:44 PDT
From: Jacki Williams <lwilliams26fusa@netscape.net>
To: heni3@aol.com, imstressfree@yahoo.com, sjackson@bracepatt.com,
ssavage@lbcpetrounited.com, vrjackson@kelsey-seybold.com,
Michelle.Franqui@imperialsugar.com, Tara_Rucker@gstworld.net,
kurtfam@pilot.infi.net, pjones3165@aol.com, robewhite@msn.com,
sewfast@yahoo.com, yellowgirlhill@netscape.net
Subject: Fwd: [FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......]
X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (M3.3.1.96)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----NetAddressPart-00--=_mTSS1408S0v6932d969"

Jacki S. Williams
lwilliams26fusa@netscape.net

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
Received: from rly-na03.mx.aol.com [205.188.158.40] by mx06 via mtad (2.6)
with ESMTP id 451eDmPWe1130M06; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:48:04 GMT
Received: from  commserver.BBCINTLTD.COM ([208.14.29.102]) by
rly-na03.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:47:46 -0400
Received: by COMMSERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id
<2TVTYVLZ>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:53:14 -0400
Message-ID: <8A557CC93507D311A4DA00A0CC25C3D93FEE3C@COMMSERVER>
From: Cleo Moran <cmoran@bbcintltd.com>
To: Josie Vrooman <jvrooman@bbcintltd.com>,        "'Angie Rivera'"
<AngR555@aol.com>,        "'Jacki Williams'"
<lwilliams26fusa@netscape.net>,        April Governo <agoverno@bbcintltd.com>
Subject: FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:53:11 -0400
Return-Receipt-To: Cleo Moran <cmoran@bbcintltd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Cedre
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 10:09 AM
> To: 'Frances Salas'; 'sylvia marti'; Cleo Moran; Catherine Donnelly
> Subject: FW: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dianne rodriguez [SMTP:drodriguez@bbcintltd.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 10:20 AM
> To: WENDY CEDRE
> Subject: Fw: FW: I said a prayer for you just now.......
>
> WENDELA THIS ONE'S FOR YOU BABE LOVE DEE*
> >        >
> >        > >
> >        > > I said a prayer for you just now.......
> >        > > When you receive this e-mail just recite the
> >        > > following prayer. That's  all you have to do. There is
> >        nothing
> >        > > attached.
> >        > > This is the power of  prayer at work. Just send this to (4)
> >        people
> >        > > and see what happens on  the fourth day. Do not break this,
> >        > > please.
> >        > >
> >        > > There is no cost, but lots  of rewards. Let's continue to
> >        pray for > > one another.
> >        > >
> >        > > Prayer
> >        > > May today there be peace within you. May you
> >        > > trust God that you are exactly where you are meant to be.
> >        > > May you not
> >        > > forget the infinite possibilities that are born of faith.
> >        > > May you use those gifts that you
> >        > > have received, and pass on the love that has
> >        > > been given to you.
> >        > > May you  be content knowing that you are
> >        > > a child of God.
> >        > > Let His presence settle into your bones, and allow your
> >        > > soul the
> >        > > freedom to sing, dance, and to  bask in the sun. It is
> >        > > there for each
> >        > > and every one of you.
> >        > >
> >        > > Send this to (4) or more people and witness the awesome
> >        power of
> >        > > prayer.
> >        > >
> >        > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

FYI-As a follow-up to my earlier e-mail, Jerry Fox advises that Peoples
does plan to revise the prior draft petition to refer to the new
information developed in the testimony. Also, there will be separate
filings of similar material seeking approval of the Peoples and North Shore
contracts with Enovate.


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


John,

The only long term deal in the west that you could put prudency against is
the PGT transport until 2023

Phillip


Note the quote from Sibley - "California is giving deregulation a bad
name......"
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/11/2000 01:31
PM ---------------------------

<fyi@mailman.enron.com> on 08/11/2000 10:19:49 AM
To: <pmahoney@enron.com>, <meberts@enron.com>, <fwanders@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Industry News: Despite Woes In California, Other States Push
Electricity De ...

-------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mailed by: Dow Jones Interactive (R) Server Software
Folder: Industry News
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Headlines:
Despite Woes In California, Other States Push Electricity
Deregulation

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  Despite Woes In California, Other States Push Electricity
Deregulation

Aug. 10, 2000
Dow Jones Online News
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Electricity deregulation has
suffered a setback
in California as the state grapples with short supply and rising prices.
But other states are pushing ahead with opening their power markets
to
competition, saying their approach should avoid the problems plaguing
the state which led the nation down the deregulation path four
years
ago.

  California has seen its power market roiled by heat waves that
left
the state scrambling to meet demand, and by soaring prices in San Diego
and southern Orange County, the first region of the country to have its
power market completely deregulated.

  "California is giving deregulation a bad name," said Texas state Sen.
David Sibley, a Republican who helped craft the bill to deregulate that
state's power industry. "But I still feel good about the bill we passed.
I feel even better about it."
  Deregulation backers outside of California said that state's
experience has been sullied by two basic shortcomings: insufficient
power generation to cover the state's demand and the exposure of retail
customers to market rates before a competitive retail market had
emerged.
  By contrast, Texas expects to have plenty of power generation on hand
when it opens its retail power markets to competition on Jan. 1, 2002.
  Unlike California -- where uncertain market conditions, local
opposition and, until recently, insufficient power prices have kept
power plant developers waiting in the wings -- Texas has attracted
billions of dollars in new power-plant investment.
  More than 10,000 megawatts will be added to the Texas grid before
competition begins, according to reports on new power plants. That's an
increase of about 20% over the state's current generating capacity.
  "The bill they passed did not send the right signals to the market,"
Sibley said of California, a Texas legislators visited before addressing
the issue in 1999. "We learned from California what we did not want to
do."
  Like Texas, Michigan hopes its success in attracting power-plant
developers to the state will help it avoid California's problems when it
allows customers to start choosing their power providers on Jan. 1,
2002. According to Gary Kitts, chief administrative officer at the
Michigan Public Service Commission, attracting independent power
producers is a key element for creating healthy competition and prices
at the retail level.
  Michigan is only in the early stages of writing the rules that will
restructure its power markets, but major developers already have begun
to show interest in building new plants in the state.
  Only days after the state passed its restructuring bills this spring,
Dallas-based Panda Energy International Inc., a privately held company,
announced plans to build a 1,000-megawatt plant by late 2004.
  Two new merchant plants already have broken ground, and three more are
in the planning stage, Kitts said.
  Likewise, Ohio regulators are hoping new power plant development will
spark healthy competition at the wholesale and retail level when
competition debuts Jan. 1, 2001.
  "We have quite a bit of generation going in the next year," said Ed
Hess, chief of the electricity division at the Ohio Public Utility
Commission.
  Ohio companies like Cinergy Corp. (CIN) and FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) are
either planning new Ohio generators or have recently brought new plants
on line.
  Like Michigan, Ohio companies won't have to sell off their plants as a
condition of deregulation and expose themselves to wholesale price
spikes as California utilities have had to do. Also, the state probably
won't see wholesale price caps similar to a $250 per megawatt-hour cap
approved last week by California's grid operator, Hess said.
  While caps can protect consumers from bloated wholesale power prices
in the short term, they can worsen the problem ultimately by deterring
development of the new power plants needed to correct supply shortages,
said Sam Rendazzo, a lawyer who represents an Ohio industrial users
group.
  "You're basically damping the pricing that developers are looking
for," he said. California is "perhaps the most dramatic evidence of a
market that's not functioning."
  In addition to counting on new generation, deregulation advocates
outside California also plan to insulate consumers from wholesale price
swings until competitive retail markets exist.
  Under the Texas restructuring law, utility rates are frozen until the
debut of competition. At that time, rates will drop 6% and hold there
for three years or until a utility has shed 40% of its customers to
competing retail suppliers.
  "There will be no authority to change rates until competition exists,"
said a Texas Public Utilities Commission spokeswoman.
  Michigan will also freeze its rates, Kitts said - for three or five
years, depending on the customer, in hopes giving competitive markets
time to develop.
  Nevertheless, California's high-profile woes are making it harder to
push deregulation elsewhere.
  Oklahoma, for example, has set a target of mid-2002 for the start of
retail competition. But the state has yet to work out the details in
legislation. The Oklahoma House of Representatives defeated a bill in
the final hour of this year's session, and a lawmaker said California's
problems will make deregulation a tougher sell in 2001.
  (Compiled from Dow Jones Newswires and other sources)
  Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones&Company, Inc.
  All Rights Reserved.

DJON0022405400

To view all headlines in the folder Industry News, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/browsearticles.asp?folderid=1

To go to the front page of Dow Jones Interactive Intranet Toolkit Server
Software, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
For assistance, contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at
djip.itkhelp@dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S.
and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright  , 2000 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. All Rights
Reserved.


Attached is what I hope is a pretty complete list of the EnronOnline
contracts I have been made aware of.  There are a few I have open questions
about  or am waiting to receive copies of the contract.  Can each of you
please take a look and think about whether there are any others we may be
missing.  Again, my time frame is short here, so if I can get your response
promptly I would be most appreciative.


FYI .... for Feb00 only, Equistar asked we deliver the gas under Sitara
106736 to HPL meter 1373 instead (the plant it was originally going to is
having some maintenance being done in Feb).

While I've already change the delivery point in the Sitara ticket, maybe
something needs to bve done to the risk assignment .....


Thanks Kim,  here are the revised agreements.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Good job Chris.

My contact at Iroq is out of the office.  When she gets back, I will agree to
pay $10,153.82 per my worksheet.  Let me know what would be the best way to
enter this in Sitara.  I think she is back in the office next week.  I also
think she will agree to my numbers just to get this resolved.  However, she
may just want us to pay what I think we owe while she does her own research.

Comments?

Christopher Spears
08/24/2000 11:38 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad Bangle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Iroquois Parking Dispute

Chris,
We paid parking fees to Iroquois for 9905 and 9906 production months:

May 1999 $1,934.42       <- included in a wire on 6/18/99 for $1,498,033.81.
June 1999 $1,872.02       <- included in a wire on 7/22/99 for $1,393,799.19.
Total  $3,806.44

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.

Thanks,
Chris


F.Y.I.

  Date      November 30, 2000
      Time      07:00 PM - 08:00 PM
      Station   PBS
      Location  Network
      Program   The Newshour With Jim Lehrer

              Ray Suarez, co-anchor:

              Finally, it's the latest hot idea for reducing energy
              costs.  Twenty-three states have enacted legislation to
              deregulate electricity rates and sixteen others are
              thinking about it, but California's pioneering efforts have
              already provoked an angry consumer backlash.  Spencer
              Michaels reports.

              Spencer Michaels reporting:

              In a San Diego strip mall, the owner of the tiny Youngling
              Oriental Vegetarian Market is having a hard time.  Yuman
              (?) Young owes two thousand dollars to San Diego Gas &
              Electric--SDG&E--an amount he can't come up with.  Like
              many San Diegans, his electricity bill has skyrocketed this
              year.

              So this is your bill in March, right?

              Yuman Young (Youngling Oriental Vegetarian Market):  Right.

              Michaels:  And the bill is--

              Young:  And see, in March, the bill comes to about four
              seventy-eight.

              Michaels:  Then we have May.

              Young:  In May, it...

              Michaels:  Then we're up--

              Young:  ...goes to six seventy something.

              Michaels:  Six seventy-four.

              Young:  Yeah.

              Michaels:  And then--

              Young:  And then...

              Michaels:  And then we skip...

              Young:  ...we skip a month.

              Michaels:  ...June, but in July--

              Young:  And the--then in July, it goes to about thirteen
              hundred dollars.

              Michaels:  Thirteen hundred dollars?

              Young:  Yeah.

              Michaels:  And the same in August?

              Young:  And the same in August.

              Michaels:  Over thirteen hundred dollars.

              Young:  Yeah, right.

              Michaels:  Young's main electricity expense is his frozen
              food freezer that he keeps at minus seventeen degrees.  But
              people without such appliances have seen residential and
              commercial bills double and triple as well.  San Diego is
              the first California city to suffer the effects of the
              deregulation of electricity, which was enacted by the state
              legislature in 1996.  The theory was that by taking away
              the monopolies enjoyed by state-regulated utility
              companies, like SDG&E, new competition among electricity
              producers would result in a drop in rates.  But since such
              simple market economics would take awhile, the legislature
              imposed a temporary rate freeze to protect most parts of
              the state from higher prices.  In San Diego, the freeze
              came off this year letting the market set the price, a
              very high price.  SDG&E is owned by Sempra Energy, where
              Stephen Baum is CEO.

              Stephen Baum (Chief Executive Officer, Sempra Energy):
              It's been a terrible shock to our customers, seeing
              real-time prices for the first time.  And those prices are
              way out of sight because the wholesale market is broken and
              needs to be fixed.

              Michaels:  The vast wholesale market is something new.
              California utilities used to own most of the power plants,
              the high-voltage transmission lines and the system to
              deliver power to homes and businesses.  Under deregulation
              the utilities still deliver the power, but had to turn
              operations of the transmission lines over to a state
              agency.  In addition, they had to sell their power plants.
              So now almost all power is sold to the utilities on a
              wholesale basis by producers or generators.  And according
              to Baum, they charge what they can get.

              Baum:  There's been a very large wealth transfer from the
              customers in the state of California to the generators.  We
              don't think the market's workably competitive.  There
              aren't enough players and there's not enough generation.
              Until that occurs, you're going to have dislocations at
              very high prices.

              Michaels:  The situation keeps getting worse as
              California's population keeps increasing, especially in the
              hot central valley.  Air conditioners and other appliances
              put a strain on a system already stressed by increased
              demand in other states where some of California's power
              comes from.  According to University of California
              economist Severin Borenstein, deregulation has aggravated
              the already tight situation.

              Severin Borenstein (University of California, Berkeley):
              Production in the state has really been stretched and that
              does two things:  One, is it naturally just creates a tight
              supply/demand situation that's going to drive prices up.
              The other thing it does, though, is it also puts the
              producers in a very strong position to push prices up even
              higher.  And, I think, there's no question the generators
              are trying to make as much money as they can.

              Michaels:  Duke Energy, headquartered in North Carolina, is
              one of the new generators in the California market.  Duke
              spokesman Tom Williams says much of its power was sold
              before prices rose and that profits are plowed back into
              new plants.

              The utilities and the consumer groups seem to think that
              the generators are making a lot of money on this crisis.
              Is that true?

              Tom Williams (Duke Energy Corporation):  Duke Energy sells
              the bulk of its power in the--in the forward market.  It
              was sold a year ago for the plants we have in the state
              now.  So the power's already been sold, and the price of
              natural gas has gone up two and a half times since last
              summer.  So there is a very tight supply situation, but
              we're reinvesting our profits back into the market to fix
              the problem.
              Michaels:  In fact, Duke is investing 1.1 billion dollars
              to modernize two inefficient power plants it bought from
              the utilities.  As part of the deal it also had to buy
              this old PG&E plant in Oakland, which has been running
              overtime because of the power shortage.  Over the last two
              decades only a few companies have actually begun
              construction of new power plants because of what they saw
              as the uncertainties of the regulatory climate.  This plant
              near San Francisco, being built by Calpine, will supply
              enough electricity for half a million homes.  It will be
              ready by next summer.  Calpine vice president, James
              Macias, says his company predicted the shortage of power
              and took a risk.

              James Macias (Vice President, Calpine):  You could see the
              fundamentals forming of the need for more--more power.
              There hasn't been a big power plant like this built in the
              state for--for decades.

              Michaels:  Macias says the utilities should have contracted
              for power at lower rates before it was actually needed.  He
              expects that the profits power companies are making now
              will decline as more power comes on line.

              Macias:  We're doing pretty good.  We're being rewarded for
              having the vision and the foresight to come in here and
              build this--this--this needed supply.  But they're not
              going to last.  As soon as this--more of the supply comes
              in, the prices will come down and they'll be--they'll be
              depressed again.  They have to come down.  This economy,
              again, can't support these high prices.

              Michaels:  Although twenty new plants are in the planning
              stages, it takes five years to design and build just one.
              With very little additional supply in the immediate
              pipeline, the director of San Diego's utility watchdog
              group, Utility Consumers Action Network, says regulators
              must get involved to return rates to reasonable levels.

              Michael Shames (Consumer Advocate):  They could have
              immediately put--reinstated a price cap.  They could have
              immediately said, hold on a second folks.  We're not going
              to tolerate this.  We're not going to see a region like San
              Diego thrust into a depression.

              Michaels:  But Michael Shames says some legislators and
              regulators were ruled by their uncompromising belief in a
              free-market ideology.

              Shames:  There were a number of people, well-placed people,
              who were so ideologically driven to force competition to
              work in a market such as energy that they didn't want to
              look at the signs when they saw that the experiment wasn't
              working.  They didn't want to acknowledge it wasn't
              working, and they were prepared to sacrifice a city, San
              Diego, a state, California, and possibly a country, in
              order to see their ideologically driven vision--vision
              work.  (Clip from a TV commercial)

              Michaels:  Shames' consumer group was so outraged at the
              price increases they bought TV ads and urged civil
              disobedience.

              Dianne Jacob (Chair, San Diego County Supervisor):  Join me
              and other San Diegans and let's send a message.  Pay only
              what is fair.  When your SDG&E bill comes, pay what you
              paid last summer.  That's fair.

              Michaels:  At the California Public Utilities Commission,
              President Loretta Lynch agrees that regulators could remedy
              the situation, but she says it's not up to the state.
              Only the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has the power
              to cut back prices.

              Loretta Lynch (California Public Utilities Commission):  If
              the federal government allowed power plant owners to make a
              reasonable profit instead of an excessive profit, then that
              would drop the price of wholesale power.  And if that price
              dropped we would not be in the pickle we're in today.

              Michaels:  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission president,
              James Hoecker, replies that simply using price controls
              discourages investment in an industry that needs it.

              James Hoecker (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission):  What
              my friend, President Lynch, has said reflects a kind of
              thinking that markets can never be made to work and that
              ultimately we have to resort to cost-based, profit kinds of
              regulation of utilities.  And I think that this market has
              marched past that as an option.

              Michaels:  In November, the Federal Energy Regulatory
              Commission proposed a major change.  Utilities would not be
              required to buy power from the power exchange--a kind of
              stock market for electricity where prices have soared.
              Instead, the utilities will be able to buy directly from
              producers.  The federal agency has launched an
              investigation into California's troubles, hoping for a
              long-term solution.

              Unidentified Woman:  This legislation, today, has the
              ability to provide immediate and real relief to San
              Diegans.

              Michaels:  The California legislature struggled this year
              with what to do, short term, for the people of San Diego.
              The debate centered around a proposal to cap electricity
              bills at sixty-five dollars a month, retroactive to June 1.

              Charlene Zettel (Assembly Member, Republican, San Diego):
              What is San Diego's problem today will be California's
              problem tomorrow.

              Rico Oller (Assembly Member, Republican, San Diego):  You
              know who we can thank for this problem?  You want to get
              right down to brass tacks?  You can thank all of the
              knuckle-headed people in this legislature and in
              government, in general--in general, who have stood in the
              way of doing the smart and sensible thing that anyone would
              have the sense to do in the real world, and that is to
              provide for their future needs by increasing production.
              We need to build some facilities to produce power.

              Unidentified Man:  All debate having ceased, the clerk will
              open the roll.  All members vote who desire to vote.

              Michaels:  The San Diego rate cap passed, but the state is
              still far from a solution.  Higher electric rates are
              forecasted for the rest of the state as the caps come off
              in other cities.  And even more troubling is the fact that
              the price rollback is being bankrolled by the utilities,
              since they still have to pay the generators for the power
              but can't pass those prices on to their customers.

              Economist Borenstein says other states better examine
              California's experience before proceeding with
              deregulation.

              Borenstein:  I think most states that are deregulating
              right now, if they have a tight supply situation, are very
              likely to see spikes just like ours.  The best advice I
              think for most of these states is to take a break, not move
              forward on their deregulation, watch the experiments that
              are going on in California and New York and Pennsylvania
              and Texas and a number of other states and learn from them,
              because we're learning a lot from them as we do this.

              Michaels:  The success or failure of deregulation across
              the country will depend partly on easy access to power
              transmission lines so that electricity can be transferred
              more readily to where it's needed.  The federal government
              is working on that problem.

                        # # #


The eThink Team

Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics?  Do you know what
policies affect corporate conduct?  Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General
Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies
today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question.  Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the
transcript later.

Stop what you're doing!  Go to the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage)
now!  Notice anything different?


Just to clarify - you are booked in the Mt. Bachelor conference room for your
Monday morning staff meetings, 9 to 10:15 a.m., from now until this time next
year. Hopefully this will eliminate any last minute confusion like what we
ran into this morning. If you have any other questions, please let Mollie or
myself know and we'll address them as quickly as possible.

Thank you -
Kate Symes
West Origination Clerk


Herman and Rose,

Thank you so much for the presentation yesterday concerning
accounting/financing issues in power development projects.  The presentation
was extremely clear and informative.  The whole group stayed interested,
which is a tribute to your preparation and delivery.

Kay


Dear Jeff,

Enron is one of our most valued customers and a leading innovator in the
use of the Internet to enable new business opportunities in your
industry.  I believe that executives of other major companies would be very
interested in learning about the ways that you have shaped your business
and leveraged networking technology to create EnronOnline and Enron
Communications.

With this in mind, I would like to personally invite you to speak to a
highly select group of CEO's and CIO's from Global 1000 corporations at our
CEO Summit being held on April 26-27, 2001 at the Ritz Carlton, Half Moon
Bay, California.  The focus of the conference will be on using Internet
business solutions to maximize global competitiveness.  I would also like
to spend some time with you more in a one on one setting to discuss the
industry and the markets in general, but candidly, to get to know you
better and build on our relationship.

Jeff, I would be honored if you would accept this invitation.  I will
follow-up with you shortly  to answer any questions you may have and to see
about your availability.

Sincerely,
John Chambers
President and CEO


On November 19, 2001, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. filed a Complaint against Public Service Electric and Gas Company (Public Service) and named PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and NYISO as necessary parties to the complaint proceeding.  Con Edison's complaint requests that the Commission investigate and remedy curtailments by Public Service of transmission service rendered pursuant to bilateral contracts between Con Edison and Public Service.

Please contact me if you would like further information on this complaint.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


Brent didn't get much sleep last night and is still under the weather.  He
will be working from home today.  You can get in touch with him via e-mail at
"bhendry@houston.rr.com" or fax him at 832-249-8654.


I believe the first 2 are revisions and the 3rd one is new to you.


I have someone that works for me that's applied for a position at Duke.  She doesn't know anyone there and neither do I, so I was wandering if any of you had a contact there.  Any help is appreciated.

Thanks and good luck to everyone.

dc


Scott:

As discussed, here's the particulars on the Bee County  Ranch:

795+ ac, lots of oak trees, one of the higher hills in Bee  County.  Good mix of pasture and sage brush.  There's a water well and  tank.

A real "honey hole".  Lots of quail and prime dove  hunting. Deer, hogs and supposedly some turkey.

Owner's name is Colton Brinkoeter.  Asking $675/acre, no  minerals.  Negotiable.  I think for that price you ought to get 1/4 -  1/2 of the minerals.

Ranch is three miles west of Mineral (NNW of Beeville about 15  miles).  His number is 361-358-2582.  I found out about it from a  mutual friend of ours, Bryan Key, also from Beeville.

P.S.  I've also attached my resume.  It looks like  our pipe deal fell through, and I am looking hard for a job back in  international marketing.  Let me know if you hear of anything.

James McCord
MC5 Operating Group
10655 Richmond Ave.,  Suite 180
Houston, TX 77042

e-mail: jrmccord@insync.net
Voice:  713-785-4141
Cell: 713-854-2044
Fax:  713-361-0470
 - 2001Resume.doc


My deal on the other side fell through - so what do you think about Garner,
Toomer, and Schroeder for Terrell and Rice


Joe,
Sorry for the big delay in all my responses.  I'm out on vacation Wed - Wed.
and can't make the video call. Please don't hesitate to set up with
Shankman.  In general he is very on board with a big effort in Asia and
realizes my views on Asia and that we have issues in Singapore.  Japan will
be a  real focus for Enron Global Markets.  He could use an update.
mike

Joseph P Hirl@ENRON
08/27/2000 05:49 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Possible video conf this week

Mike,

Would it be possible to get yourself and Shankman on a video call sometime
this week?  While we have given you an update a little over a month ago,
quite a bit has happened since then.  This might also be a good intro for
Shankman, particularly before we can you the both of you over this way.

Wed your time would be preferable... but we are flexible.

Joe


Ava, can you sign me up for the Tuesday, June 26?  If I am not
available, could you spend some time with me and train me after
my conversion next week?  Thanks. Lynn

Ava Garcia
06/22/2001 02:49 PM
To:	Katherine Perry/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott Hibbard/ENRON@enronXgate, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Kowalke/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Bodnar/Enron@EnronXGate, Jean Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Bryan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Carr/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shirley Walden/Enron@EnronXGate, Albert Hernandez/Enron@EnronXGate, Christine McEvoy/Enron@EnronXGate, Beverly Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Minter/Enron@EnronXGate, Amy Mulligan/Enron@EnronXGate, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Ward/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jean Adams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Benningfield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tangie Dykes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sherry Forbish/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Greaney/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Janzen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe Linhart/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet McDaniel/Enron@EnronXGate, Debra Scurlock/Enron@EnronXGate, Kathy Sturr/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry Woodson/Enron@EnronXGate, William Aldinger/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Karen Clapper/Enron@EnronXGate, Marion Collins/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Galen Coon/Enron@EnronXGate, Tim Cooper/Enron@EnronXGate, James Cramer/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Giambrone/Enron@EnronXGate, Jack Howard/Enron@EnronXGate, Lynda Laferla/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Phillips/Enron@EnronXGate, Nancy Callans/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, mary locknar, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Washington/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Wilkens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Outlook 2000 Training

FYI:  If you would like to take an Outlook 2000 training course there will be a training session on Tuesday, June 26 1:00p.m.-2;00p.m.  Next training session will be Tuesday, July 10th 1:00p.m.-2:00p.m.  If you are interested please call Magdelena at ext: 31816 or send an email to magdelena.cruz@enron.com

Second option is to learn on your own with the help of an Outlook 2000 booklet which will include pamphlets, in this case send me an email and I will place an order.

Thanks,
Ava-35842


Thanks for the Pappa's gift certicate.  For a woman who can't remember the
last time that she cooked dinner, this will come in very handy!  Thanks, too,
for the beautiful flower arrangement that has graced my desk for the past two
days.  I will take that home with me tonight and I will enjoy it during my
upcoming days off.

I hope that the Christmas holiday brings each of you the joy of the season --
and some rest, relaxation and time with family and friends.  Thanks for your
enthusiasm in your role at Enron and for your continuing and tireless
effort.  It is through working with each one of you that I find my job to be
fun.  1999 was a year of outstanding accomplishments for Energy Operations -
a direct result of your contributions.  I look forward to meeting new
challenges in 2000 through continuing to work together.


All is well here.   It sounds like you are very busy.  I glad you are taking
the options course - it will really benefit you.  Also,  Andrea Richards is
the person I
contacted with the Associate program to request that your first rotation be
in the Trading group - so we should be in good shape on that front.  Her
phone number is 713 853 6499 for your future reference.  Thanks for the
email, I look forward to seeing you this summer.

Scott

"Kevin B Murray" <kmurra1@lsu.edu> on 03/04/2001 12:20:04 PM
To: Scott.Neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: update

Scott:

Greetings from LSU.  I sent you an email a few weeks ago, but perhaps you
didn't receive it.  No big deal.

I just wanted to drop you a line and let you know how I'm doing.  My last
semester is shaping up to be pretty tough.  The MBA class in Real Options
is, to say the least, tough!  I'm preparing for my mid-term right now, and
so far we've learned about Binomial trees, Sharpe ratios, the GOPOP model,
risk-neutral pricing, Stochastic Processes, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo,
and pricing American, European, and exotic options.  What's also great
about the class is that our professor constantly uses Enron as an example
of how this stuff works in the real world.  It's a great class!

One of my other classes, Economic Forecasting, is challenging as well,
because I'm dealing with a software package, Eviews, for the first time.
Enough about the academics, though; I'm working hard and that's what I need
to be doing.

I've also started reading Reminiscences, and I find myself highlighting
lines on every page!  I figured I'd start with the less technical books
first, considering my workload.

I'm going to be in Houston looking for apartments this weekend, 3/9 - 3/11
with my roommate, Ed Brady, who will also be at Enron in July.  Let me know
how your schedule looks, and maybe we can get together.

Hopefully my getting into your fundamentals group or the new trading
rotation that you spoke of is still a high probability.  As I'm learning
more about options and futures in class, you're definitely right--I think
trading is where I want to be!

Thanks again and I hope to hear from you soon.  I hope all is well in
Houston.

Kevin


Gina-

For the time being, keep the PR groups sweet but make no commitments.  We need to obtain market commitments as a first priority, which Kevin is pursuing most diligently.  He should have more feedback in October.

Keep us on your 'to do' list and thanks for all your help!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Gina
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Gadd, Eric; Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	PR Firm in Arizona

Hi Eric and Kevin!

I have heard from the PR group in Tuscon and they are anxious to start working with us.  They actually mentioned partnering with the Phoenix firm, just like we tossed around.

Would ya'll like to get together to discuss what direction we head?  With an expected first quarter 2002 filing, I think we need to start identifying our stakeholders and getting in touch with them.   We'll need the PR firm to get things moving for us.

Thanks a million.

Gina


We have a time & a conference room for the demo.  We will meet at 10:30 on
Monday, December 11th in room EB21C2.

See you then.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
12/06/2000 11:01 AM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: HPL-Online Final OUA and PA

Michael

Gerald and I are available (at the moment) all day on Monday as well.  Let us
know when and where and we'll be there.   I'd change the wording to Password
application in the letter since that is what it's titled.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/06/2000 10:46 AM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Romeo D'Souza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawn MacPhail/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HPL-Online Final OUA and PA

I think a demo is definitely in order.  I am (at the moment) available all
day Monday, December 11th.  Let me know what time and I will get a room.  If
we can make it after 10:30, then Ed Gottlob can possibly join us.  He hasn't
seen the site either. Ed - Let me know if you are interested.

Eric - the online registration form that I refer to is the Password
Application.  I can change the wording to reflect this.

Romeo/Shawn - See the attached doc's below and place these in the site.

We are in the home stretch for phase I !!!!

thanks for all of your help.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
12/06/2000 09:52 AM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL-Online Final OUA and PA

Michael,

I've attached the password application and Online User Agreement in order for
you to place these finalized versions on the website.

One question/clarification:  You refer to an on-line registration form in
your previous e-mail and in the HIWAY Promotion Letter, I assume you are
referring to the Password Application?

Gerald is checking on the trademark/name availability for Information HIWAY,
and will get back to you shortly.
Also, Gerald and I would like to sit down with you sometime early next week
and have you demo the website for us before it goes live; are you available?

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/05/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

looks fine with me.  is the next step placing the finalized versions of the
HPL Online registration & OUA out to the web site?  we also plan to mail a
letter to our customers along with inserting these documents.  the letter is
attached.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
12/05/2000 01:55 PM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

Michael,

Attached for your review and comment is the updated draft incorporating
certain copyright and contractual relationship language.  The new sections
that were added are Section 1(c) and Section 4.  If you have any questions or
comments please give me a call.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/04/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

we are trying to finalize this section.  could you guys give us your input?

thanks,    mve
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

meiben@ect.enron.com on 11/30/2000 04:21:03 PM
Please respond to meiben@ect.enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

LEGAL AND PRIVACY INFORMATION

1. All information and material including images, text and audio on this
website is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its subsidiaries (and/or its or
its subsidiaries' licensors) (collectively "Enron") and is subject to
copyright.Trading Innovation, Endless possibilities, Enron.com, Enron, Enron
& design, Enron Corp., Enron Corp. & design, Enron with fanciful E, Enron
with fanciful E (color), are all trademarks owned by Enron Corp. All other
trade marks on this website are the property of their respective owners. You
are entitled to view, copy and print any documents from this website but only
for your own internal business purposes. Any sale, transmission or
redistribution of this website or its content, and any copying, modification
or other use of this website or its content for any purposes other than your
own internal business purposes, are strictly prohibited.
2. This website is provided solely for information purposes and, with the
exception of this "Legal and Privacy" statement, is not intended to, and
shall not, constitute any offer or acceptance with respect to any
transactions or other matters. This website shall not create any legal
relationship between you and Enron, unless you have signed a Password
Application, in which case the Online User Agreement and all terms and
conditions referred to therein shall govern your access and utilization of
this website. Copies of the Online User Agreement may be obtained through the
"Registration" Section on this website. This website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions.
3. This website and the information and material which it contains are
subject to change at any time by Enron without notice and Enron reserves the
right to suspend, terminate or restrict your access to or use of this
website. All warranties, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information contained on this website or in respect of
any materials or products referred to on this website are hereby excluded to
the extent permitted by law.

NETSCAPE NETCENTER	spacer	??Search??-??WebMail??-??My Netscape??-??Buddy Chat??-??Help
??-??Download??
		spacer

Check out our advertiser! Click here.

	[IMAGE]Home > ?Netscape?Search		?[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	Search Results

		- Search Categories -Arts & EntertainmentBusinessComputing &
InternetGamesHealthHome &
FamilyNetscapeNewsRecreationReferenceRegionalScience &
TechnologyShoppingSociety & LifestylesSportsWorld
			[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	Search Here:
	[IMAGE]
	amazon.com
	 legal and...
	Buy Books Here
	Holiday Shopping

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?

	[IMAGE]
	Specialized Searches
	Yellow Pages
	People Finder
	Maps and Directions
	Product Search
	Decision Guides
	Local Information
	International Search

	[IMAGE]
	Search again for
	'  legal and...  ' using
	Google

	[IMAGE]
	Learn More
	Search directly from your browser.
	Internet Keywords
	Netscape Search
	Affiliate Program
	Frequent Questions
	Tips on Searching

	[IMAGE]
	 Get Involved
	Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	Become an Editor
	Suggest a Site
	Give Feedback

	Get the latest
	Communicator.
	  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

					Search Results for ' legal and privacy page
					[IMAGE]

					[IMAGE]
					Reviewed Web Sites
					Web sites reviewed and categorized by a team of editors.
					1 - 1 ?of ? 1

					 CPierson's Cyberlaw Page
					Links to cases, statutes, and legal information relating to the Internet,
including First Amendment, intellectual property, privacy, commerce, and
crime.
					http://www.cpierson.com/
					found in:? Society > Law > Legal Information > Computer and Technology Law
?>? Legal Links
					?

					[IMAGE]

					 Search for 'legal and privacy page' with these other search engines:
					AltaVista |  AskJeeves | Excite | GoTo |  HotBot | LookSmart | Lycos

					[IMAGE]
					??Search Again or Ask a Question
					[IMAGE]

					???
						[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	??Netcenter Help??-??Site Map??-??Advertise with Us??-??What's
New??-??What's Cool 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
Check out our advertiser! Click here.
,?2000 Netscape. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Tana:  Please see Sami's message below.  Is there something you can send?  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

Sami Arap@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/05/2000 09:18 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Sara;

Are you also involved in EnronOnLine ?  I only got a copy of an EOL summary
but would like to receive a more detailed memo about such business.  Can you
provide me with any additional materials ?!

Thanks,

Sami

Sara Shackleton@ECT
05/04/2000 04:29 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Hi, Sami!  Sorry we missed the call yesterday.  I just wanted to update you
on some of the financial trading issues in Brazil (and I have added you to
the working group list).  I am going to finalize our "swap matrix" for
Brazil.  On the physical trading side, I had asked a physical trading lawyer
to call you and am wondering if Elizabeth Sager ever called or emailed.
Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 05/04/2000 01:21:59 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Andrea.Bertone@enron.com, Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com,
Rick.Hopkinson@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br, Krishna@tozzini.com.br
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your message below. Please find attached hereto free
translation into English of new foreign investor's regulations in Brazil. We
are preparing a memo to you in connection with such new regulations and are
finalizing the matrix prepared last year. We will send them to you shortly.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/04 12:08 pm >>>

AFAC and Marcelo:  I hope this message finds you both well.  I would like to
finalize the matrix which was prepared last year so that we can create a
"baseline" for future updates.  Please feel free to date the matrix as of
December, 1999, if you wish.  Please forward any recent changes to me for
comment  and I will respond immediately.  Then we can move on to other things!
Thanks for your help and attention to this mattter.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
10:34
AM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 03/13/2000 06:27:26 PM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:   Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br
Subject:  Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your E-mail below. We will be reflecting the new changes in the
regulations in the chart and will be sending it to your review as soon as
possible.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 03/13 2:29 pm >>>

Greetings to you both!  It has been awhile since we last spoke.  I would like
to
finalize the matrix which we have been discussing since the latter part of
1999.
Although we were awaiting new Central Bank regulations, I am beginning to
think
that the Central Bank revisions will not impact the matrix except with respect
to transactions which may be entered into by entities that are the subject of
the Central Bank regulations.  Please let me know whether or not you agree or
can offer any suggestions.  Thanks and regards.  Sara

 - Res2689a.doc
 - Ins325a.doc


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 05:30 PM -----

	Mark Taylor
	07/20/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: Andy zipper
		 cc:
		 Subject: Direct Access Disclaimer Language

As I mentioned in my voice-mail, this needs to go somewhere that users might
actually see it - e.g. a news ticker story.  Simply adding it to the Legal &
Privacy Statement, while helpful, is not sufficient.

EnronOnline is conducting a pilot program involving direct access connections
(such as a "T1" line or other means of direct access) to EnronOnline, as an
alternative to internet access.   Direct access connections might enable
users to access EnronOnline more quickly than is currently possible through
internet access.


Deliveries continue to be 30,000


Not a problem.  Kay and I will try to get together later today.

I see that I failed  to complete my train of thought under Section 14.1(i) re
warranty term.  So attached is a revised copy of my markups to GE's suggested
language.  You can disregard prior version.

Have a safe trip,

Scott

	Sheila Tweed@ECT
	02/05/2001 09:46 AM

		 To: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: GE - End World Hunger

Would you all mush on without me today?  I will be traveling to Portland and
won't be available until about 5:30 your time today.


We have received several responses to Sidney's letter to shareholders, both
positive and negative.   A few shareholders indicated that copies of their
response would be sent to board members.  We are very interested in all
letters received from our shareholders and would appreciate it if you would
please forward to us any letters that you receive.   We prefer that you not
respond to any letter that you may receive relative to this matter as we
are collecting all letters and will respond to them as appropriate.   If
you have any questions, please contact me.  Thanks for your help.

Alecia DeCoudreaux


From today's Gas Daily:

***FERC gives Kern River project speedy approval

     Only three weeks after receiving the certificate application, FERC
Friday granted Kern River Gas Transmission authority to proceed
with a 135 million cfd expansion of its system that will move new
gas supplies from Wyoming to California. The unprecedented speed in
which FERC completed its review of the $81 million project grew out
of the commission's desire to address the energy crisis in
California, which is expected to worsen this summer in light of
forecasts for continued high gas prices and shortages of power
generation capacity.
     FERC typically takes several months to complete the review
process of a pipeline project application of similar size to Kern
River's, a FERC spokeswoman said. But the commission said its staff
was able to successfully coordinate regulatory efforts with
federal and state agencies to ensure Kern River's application
process moved expeditiously.
     "We are pleased the FERC has fast-tracked this application," said
Kirk Morgan, director of business development for Kern River. "We
are looking at every option to bring additional supplies of natural
gas to the California market in time for the summer cooling
season," he said.
     The expansion will include three new "emergency" compressor
stations: the Elberta Compressor Station in Utah County, Utah; the
Veyo Compressor station in Washington County, Utah; and the
Daggett Compressor Station in San Bernardino County, Calif. The
installation of these new facilities -- which have been approved by
various permitting agencies in Wyoming, Utah, Nevada and California
-- will boost capacity on the system by 19%, Kern River said.
     The proposal also included upgrades at three existing
compressor stations: the Muddy Creek Compressor Station in
Lincoln County, Wyo., the Fillmore Compressor Station in Millard
County, Utah; and the Goodsprings Compressor Station in Clark
County, Nev. The plan also included an upgrade of the existing
Wheeler Ridge Meter Station in Kern County, Calif. Kern River said
Friday that the expansion's expected in-service date is July 23.
     "Our rapid certification of these facilities is evidence that we
are prepared to do whatever we can to rush supplies to the West
Coast markets," FERC Chairman Curt Hebert said in a statement
Friday. "My fellow commissioners, William L. Massey and Linda K.
Breathitt, pulled together, with staff's assistance, to give priority
to the West's energy needs."
     Although she voted to approve the certificate, Breathitt wasn't
completely happy with the process involved in permitting. "[I]t has
been somewhat difficult for me to view Kern River's 'California
Action' project as being one that necessarily merits the kind of
extraordinary regulatory treatment that we have granted the
applicant in this case," Breathitt wrote in a partial dissent. "My
hesitation does not come only from the fact that Kern River has
pending before this commission a very similar proposal in which
the parties have raised valid concerns that would pertain to any
expansion of Kern River."
     In a separate proceeding, Kern River, a subsidiary of Williams,
filed an application with FERC last year for permission to add
124,500 dth/d of firm transportation service, which is scheduled
to go into service May 1, 2002. Breathitt argued that it would have
made more sense for the commission to have considered the two
applications at the same time.
     But she also stressed that, because of capacity constraints at
the Wheeler Ridge, Calif., interconnections with the intrastate
distribution systems of Southern California Gas and Pacific Gas and
Electric, the Kern River expansion may not benefit its intended
beneficiaries -- power plant operators. "[T]he record of this
proceeding is inadequate for the commission to independently
assess the congestion issues at Wheeler Ridge," she said. "I am very
uncomfortable that this order does not take the opportunity for a
fuller airing of this issue."
     Breathitt argued that FERC's order will not necessarily result
in any net increase of gas in the California marketplace because of
the congestion at Wheeler Ridge.
     Intervenors in the case, she noted, have alleged that insufficient
take-away capacity at Wheeler Ridge and the resulting degradation of
firm shippers' rights will place them in a situation analogous to
the type of capacity rights controversy that FERC recently
addressed at the Topock delivery point.
     She praised FERC staff for meeting the compressed deadlines in
the order, but she also said, "The precedent we have created could
be a double-edged sword. What signals does this order really send?
Will the commission be able to keep up this pace on other pending
'emergency' expansion applications?" (CP01-106)     MH/CD


Gerald,

I spoke with the parking department. They said to send an e-mail saying it is
alright for me to receive subsidized parking. When you e-mail them, they also
need the company #, and RC #. I know you are real busy, so please send the
e-mail at your earliest convenience. In addition, if you have any more gas
transactional work, please send it my way. Louis Allen is the person that
needs to receive the e-mail from you. His address is louis.allen@enron.com.
Also, they probably have my legal name, which is Nabil Nachawati.

Thank you,

Majed


maybe in the new parking lot


fine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thibaut, Dan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	RE: vacation

Correction!

13 through the 31st.

Thanks,

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Thibaut, Dan
Subject:	RE: vacation

Sounds good

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thibaut, Dan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	vacation
Importance:	High

Errol,

I would like to take vacation starting on the 13th and ending on the 28th.

Please let me know if there is a conflict as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Dan


Peter & Michelle,
?
Brian Hiebert forwarded to me Peter's questions regarding the risk of
asbestos litigation at Celgar.
?
Under the Workers Compensation Act, employers in British  Columbia are
required to contribute to an accident fund which provides  compensation for
injuries or occupational diseases arising out of employment. In  turn,?the
Act?provides employers statutory immunity from?damages  in respect of any
personal injury, disablement or death arising out of and in  the course of
employment.
?
The accident fund would cover asbestos claims. There are no  exceptions?which
would allow asbestos litigation?against employers.  The Act does?not
prohibit?litigation against third parties, eg.  manufacturers of asbestos,
but employers, as stated, are immune from such  actions.
?
Compensation is payable if the worker sustains pulmonary injury by a
disabling form of asbestosis. We will make the appropriate enquires about
any  compensation paid to Celgar employees.
?


Not that I'm aware of....Gerry asked for an example, in response on Wednesday concerning how a nomination would look, but I'm not aware of any responses back to him. I have a call into Gerry and I am getting ready to send him a nomination example, just in case he didn't get one.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 12:36 PM
To:	Bodnar, Michael
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

	Mike, did any one ever answer Reyna?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Medeles, Gerry; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Black, Legale ; January, Steve
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

Well, it's Mid October and I am checking on the status of the SBA Priority during Allocations.  The new contracts are due to take effect November 1, 2001, and with cold weather already on the horizon we could be headed for the same types of problems we had last  winter.

Do you have an estimated time of implementation?  Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help.

Thank you for your help.
Reyna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Thank you Gerry...I'll email you again in Mid October.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Medeles, Gerry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I have worked up the requirements and the TMS IT group is evaluating the changes.  Due to the CMS implementation we would not be able to implement this change.  The earliest we might be able to implement is Mid to late October.  If you have any questions please call.  Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Gerry/Legale,

Would you be able to update us on the status of the SBA priority during Allocations?  September 1st has rolled around really fast.

Thanks,
Reyna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kirk, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Reyna,  this is to confirm that the SBA-TI's should be scheduled after primary but before all other nominations.  sjk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

Steve,
Back in June we discussed the issue of the SBAs' priority during an Allocation.  The Business Development group and Contracts are in the process of making the necessary changes so that CMS can distinguish ITs associated with SBA activity from other IT agreements and are second through the meter after Primary during allocations.  For your information, below are the comments from the various people involved in this issue

Please let us know if you have any further concerns regarding this issue.  Thanks for your continued help in this matter.

Reyna Cabrera
X33072

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:47 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I believe Reyna, et al, have held discussions with the Reg Types and received the green light to go forward, but I will confirm.

Regarding (2.), With the new contract system being developed, the monitoring of contract provisions via the system should be do-able. I am sure both CMS and TMS will be involved in the effort.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:19 AM
To:	Bodnar, Michael
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

	Mike, thanks for the update.  I have a couple of questions/comments:

	1.  Is Legal and Regulatory in the loop on these decisions?

	2.  Anything we can automate, I would like to ensure we have the automation on the enhancement
	     list.  I like the idea of automating the last bullet.  I am not sure if it is in CMS or elsewhere, but
	     I would like to be sure we pursue this automation.
	Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

Lynn,
Below is a list of issues that were raised at the meeting held w/ Gerry and Reyna (attended by John and I) ......As far as I know, we haven't yet heard back from Sue regarding the issues raised.

....Immediately below is LT's response to adding a "hook" in CMS that would distinguish ITs associated with SBA activity from other IT agreements....

More as it develops!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Linda
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Bodnar, Michael
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I don't have a problem adding a subtype on the IT's of SBA.  I'm not sure I understand your last bullet. Can you give me more info.

LT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Neville, Sue; Medeles, Gerry
Cc:	Threet, Kay; Bodnar, Michael; Trevino, Linda
Subject:	SBA Priority during Allocations

Sue,
During the meeting today with Gerry to discuss the SBA priority during allocations, some of the following issues came up:  (Gerry, correct me if I misunderstood anything)

If we ever call an SBA to bring in gas after the timely cycle, do we still want them to have priority over Alternate and Interruptible? (my opinion is no, they should only have this priority during the timely cycle).
If the SBAs bring in gas at a secondary point, do we still want them to have priority over Alternate and Interruptible?  (my opinion is no, they should only have this priority at Primary Points).
Are we aware that an Alternate shipper who has flowing rights from the previous day might get "squeezed" out of the same entitlement on a day that an SBA shipper is given priority over Alternate?  Might have some mad shippers.
How will SBA volumes be posted on the EBB if there is an allocation: Interruptible???
Because the current methodology for allocation is based on a "point", they don't follow the downstream, will the IT contracts currently being used have to be identified through the contracts department as "SBA IT"?
This is for the future contracts system:  Should we ask that the new contract system to automate all the manual processes of the SBAs such as account balance and carryover days in order for the system to be able to validate this criteria?

Reyna Cabrera
(713) 853-3072


Thanks for the note - do we have any indication of the price?

Regarding the UK Emissions Trading Scheme:
We met with Sainsburys on Friday to discuss a number of issues including participation in the emissions trading scheme pilot in Q1 2002. They are interested in doing this and, given the short timescale, we are moving forward to assemble the necessary data package. Currently Sainsbury are working with Bridget Rosewell of Volterra Consulting who is on the ETG steering committee and is advising them on the political issues.
There are a number of issues we need to consider in putting together the bid:
1. Do we have any experience of descending clock auctions? It looks fairly straightforward but I would be grateful for any views.
2. There is concern that one of the large chemical/ cement makers/ etc could swamp the market and take the whole pot - any views?
3. Do we have a view on the price of carbon? We have a lot of details on the price of abating a tonne of carbon in a range of industries but little data on the potential price. The government target is to save 2 million tonnes / year therefore if the pot is ?30 million / year this  suggests a figure of ?15 / tonne. However I have seen higher and lower figures suggested as the targets however I would have thought that it will be necessary to achieve the lowest cost / tonne as this is funded by the taxpayer?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacobson, Lisa
Sent: 21 September 2001 17:37
To: Redshaw, Louis; Profir, Diana; Badger, Dan; Hussain, Mustafa; Woods,
Trevor; Taylor, Michael E; Oliver, John; Schoen, Mary; Bolton, Stacey;
Mainzer, Elliot; Keeler, Jeff
Subject: UK Allowance Release....

FYI only.  Forwarded from Natsource.  Please let me know if you have any questions.


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041318.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I will take care of this on Wednesday.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Reuter+2C+20Marisa+22+20+3CMReuter+40KSLAW+2Ecom+3E+40EN
RON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Cc: Mann, Kay; Keffer, John
Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: Incumbency Certificate

Kathleen:

Paul Hastings would like ENA to resign the Incumbency Certificate, since the
original Certificate did not affix the corporate seal.  Could you coordinate
this and make sure the seal is affixed to the new Certificate?  Thanks.

Call me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Marisa

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Reuter, Maria I. (Business E-Mail Address).vcf << File: Reuter, Maria I.
(Business E-Mail Address).vcf >>


bought  25mw OffPk  Cal2005 Nepool PTF  $37.50
bought  50mw OffPk  Cal2002 Nepool PTF  $42.50
sold  25mw OffPk  Cal2003 Nepool PTF  $37.00
bought  50mw OnPk  June-01  ERCOT   $62.50
sold  50mw OnPk  April-01  NY Zone G  $53.00
bought  50mw OnPk  Cal2002 NY Zone G  $60.00
sold  50mw OnPk  April-01  NY Zone G  $52.00


Attached is a summary and individual survey of current EnronOnline customers.  I am still waiting to talk to several customers who have traded voice mails.

 mails.

We can discuss at your convenience.


For our argument that the market is responding to expected new supplies.

----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 06/15/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Jeffrey Oh/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/15/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Gen Report

Jeffrey Oh
Enron North America   503.464.7789
West Power Desk    503.708.1760 (c)
121 SW Salmon Street 3WTC0306  503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, Oregon 97204   jeffrey.oh@enron.com


I am prapring for a trip to Denver tomorrow.  Can we push this off until next
week.

Yair Yaish
Office of General Counsel
AEGM
2-7955

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:44 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: "Transfer" provision

Yair:

Tracy and I would like to discuss the "Transfer" issue with you tomorrow,
if possible.  We think this should be a short discussion (maybe 10
minutes).  How is 1 pm NY time, tomorrow Wednesday April 25?  This seems to
be the most convenient for both of us, but we will entertain times before 3
pm NY time.

Would you please email your response?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


551764

Stephanie Piwetz   03/15/2001 02:51 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Checout 3/15/01

Kate-missing bloomberg trade for Matt M

Enron buys BP Energy
Plao verde
May 01
25mws
265.00

thanks


Following up on our discussions at the September 17 Board meeting, Wednesday we communicated our earnings expectations for the 3rd & 4th Quarters, 2001, 2002, and 2003 to investment analysts.  This communication was as we discussed at the Board meeting, but in addition we chose to communicate the special charges that we will be incurring in the 3rd & 4th Quarters.  Since it was relatively close to our earnings announcement [planned for October 18], we decided that it would be best to disclose the special charges now rather than waiting.
Attached is an updated summary of the special charges.  They have changed somewhat since the Board as we raised  the total charge for the third quarter by $.04 per share to $.14.   Specifically, in the Restructuring and Asset Impairment category the charge increased by $.03 primarily due to the required write off of  manufacturing facilities in Brazil.  We also added $.01 related to Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt as our open market repurchase activity resulted in the acquisition of a higher mix of longer-term issues, thus increasing the cost somewhat.
The reaction by analysts to these charges is that they are truly one time items.  Therefore, they will be normalized out and analysts will view the 3rd Quarter results as being $.66 per share.
Even though we lowered expectations for the fourth quarter and 2002, overall the communication was accepted positively. In particular, investors appreciated our willingness and need to spend more in 2002 to maximize the sales of the five new products we expect to launch in 2001 and 2002. We closed Thursday at just under $79, down about $3.75 from our close on Tuesday. This was a much better result than we anticipated.
If you have any questions about this, please let me know.
Charlie
10/4/2001

 - Q3 & 2001 Yr Normalized Items.doc


Charles --

The RTO week stuff is different from SSO stuff, right?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Yeung, Charles
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Rodriquez, Andy; Novosel, Sarah; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael;
Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.;
Hoatson, Tom; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Alvarez, Ray;
Shelk, John; Bestard, Jose
Cc: Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard
Subject: RE: RTO Week - FERC Staff Perspectives

We can consider this a final version for Jose to send to the BOT.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Novosel, Sarah; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer,
Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Nicolay,
Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Alvarez, Ray; Shelk, John; Yeung,
Charles; Bestard, Jose
Cc: Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard
Subject: RE: RTO Week - FERC Staff Perspectives

Sarah,

I wrote a couple paragraphs on the "standards and practices" section.  Essentially, they reinforce what was in the staff summary and add a little hint of some of the language Charles, Jim, you, and I have been working on re: support of an SSO.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771

-----Original Message-----
From: Novosel, Sarah
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Rodriquez, Andy
Subject: RE: RTO Week - FERC Staff Perspectives

Andy:

For some reason, I cannot get email to list your name as a recipient, so I am sending this email to you as a reply to your email.  Anyway, I just sent this note out to the RTO team.  Let me know what you think.

Sarah

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Alvarez, Ray; Shelk, John
Cc:	Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RTO Week Comments

Comments on FERC's RTO Week are due on November 3 (Saturday) so we would like to submit comments by the end of this week.  Some of us have briefly discussed the types of comments we may want to submit on behalf of Enron, and the attached list of "Talking Points" are issues that Christi and I put together for Rick during his Washington meetings last week.  These talking points focus on issues that were raised during RTO Week by panelists that we may want to address -- either because the point made was a good point that we want to highlight, or because the point made was wrong and we want to clarify the record.  We will use the talking points as an outline on issues to raise in our comments.

We also want to state up front in the comments that FERC is on the right track and that FERC has done a lot of analysis and studies to determine that "right sized" RTOs are in the public interest (this is in response to the negative comments made by the state commissioners that FERC is taking action that has not been proven to be beneficial to consumers).  We also want to make the point that RTO creation is not about retail access and does not impact whether or not a state offers retail choice.

Also attached is a link to FERC Staff's notes from RTO Week.  I have not reviewed these notes yet, but we may also want to respond to these notes in our comments using the same criteria as above; i.e., on areas where we feel that the point made was a good point that we want to highlight, or because the point made was wrong and we want to clarify the record.

Please review the Talking Points paper and the Staff Notes, and let me know what you think about this strategy.  I am writing the comments and welcome all help and input.

I hope to keep these comments limited (10 pages or so), so we need to stay focused -- raise the issue, make our point, and move on.

Thanks Everyone

Sarah

 http://www.ferc.gov/Electric/RTO/workshops/staffsummary.pdf

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Novosel, Sarah; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hawkins, Bernadette; Walton,
Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.;
Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Alvarez, Ray; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RTO Week - FERC Staff Perspectives

FYI, FERC has posted their perceptions of the results of RTO week.  They look pretty good, for the most part.  We may want to make some comments to support or refute items as the case may be.  The summary is located at the following link:

http://www.ferc.fed.us/Electric/RTO/workshops/staffsummary.pdf

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Hey Rob,

I put some Katy basis products out there for approval.  Could you see to
those?

Thanks,

Eric


what is it.  i got to know.  i need some new chicks.  i need the weekend.
today totally sucks.  what are some good books to read?


Don't worry about how good you are.  I'm terrible also.  I've put you down as
playing.  I'll keep you posted.

DG    3-9573


As per our discussion.
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
12/05/2000 08:39 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gas group new hires

I am no longer coordinating the "next-year" activities for new hires in the
gas group so I thought I'd just let you know that the Midwest gas team is
interviewing new hires for coverage/origination roles. I believe Laura is
wanting to hire some of these folks to be based in Chicago and I would think
you would want them to be located in Houston. Just fyi.


What is the last day for Deen to ask for a jury?

	"Bill W. Ogden" <bogden@ogwb.com>
	08/08/2000 10:43 AM
	Please respond to bogden

		 To: "Richard Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Natole

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Dorfman  [mailto:gdorfman@ogwb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:34  AM
To: bogden@ogwb.com
Subject: Natole

Judge Christopher's coordinator confirms we are on the  non-jury
docket.?Docket positions will not be given out until the Friday  before trial
-- Sept. 1.?


The results of the PM's visit to Washington and, with it, the opportunity for a dialogue between the two governments on Dabhol were disappointing, to say the least.
	As the PM was arriving White House lawyers made a determination that neither the President nor Larry Lindsey could speak to the Dabhol situation.  It was decided that Condi Rice would raise the issue with Mishra when they met on Thursday but she unfortunately did not.  The GOI apparently raised Dabhol in the Lindsey meeting but all he could do was hear them out and then explain that he could not discuss the issue.  Great impression!
	The PMO Secretary refused to meet with me once he learned no one from Houston could come up.
	OPIC is furious about the outcome.  OPIC leadership knows the project is about to be dropped in their lap.  We will be meeting in the next several days as they are travelling but I have already broached the idea that OPIC should approve a move to termination preemptively.  They understand where we are coming from but preliminarily are looking at a trip to India to meet with the GOI and explain what lies before them.  We also discussed their need to get clarification from the NSC as to where Dabhol stands in their list of priorities.  OPIC has to bring along the other parts of the Administration and it is unclear where they stand in light of the past week. Once Larson is back from Doha we will meet and sort out where State is on pressing the issue.
	All in all a good opportunity lost. Standard fare for a terrible week.  ohn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hardy Jr, John
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Walls Jr., Rob; Cline, Wade; Lundstrom, Bruce
Cc:	Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Dabhol Washington Update

	Here is an update on the state of play in Washington regarding Dabhol as the Indian PM arrives this evening:

	As it became apparent last week that the discussions in Delhi about the MOU were not panning out, I met with OPIC President Watson and Exec VP Connelly to bring them up to speed on the status of discussions and map out the message to be given by the Administration to the PM on his visit this week.  While OPIC certainly does not have final say re the message on Dabhol they are clearly the driver within the USG and they have been very aggressive in that regard.  Out of our meeting Watson sent to State and the NSC a message with the following two points:
	1.  the Project sponsors, the $ lenders, and OPIC and EXIM are of one mind that the negotiating time frame on Dabhol is approaching its end.  If India does not act immediately it will be too late.
	2.  The President and this Administration needs to express its strong disappointment at the failure of the GOI to make an effort to engage on the Buyout, which needs to be negotiated within a particular $ range, subject to a simultaneous negotiation with the $ lenders.

	The OPIC memo was sent to State and the NSC and is now embodied in talking points for President Bush in his Friday meeting with the PM.  For the last week plus I have provided daily updates to OPIC, to Larson's office at State, to the South Asia regional group and to the NSC so they know of any new developments and where we are.  Yesterday afternoon I  met with OPIC on the lawsuit and how that might change the talking points.

	At this point, President Bush will raise Dabhol in his meeting with the PM Friday. The Indian Ambassador met with the NSC yesterday to discuss the agenda and was briefed on the MOU going in.
	It is being considered that Larry Lindsey will discuss Dabhol in greater detail, probably with Mishra.  There was some concern about prior relationship to Enron but I understand from State the lawyers have taken care of the concern.
	Larson is in Doha but is current on the situation and can engage if necessary.  It is unfortunate he is out of town.
	Amb. Blackwill had dinner last night with Watson and Connelly of OPIC and claims he is on top of the issue.

	Last, but certainly not least, we have a meeting with the PMO Secretary Ghash (?) at 4:30 Thursday at the Indian Embassy.  I do not know if we have firmly decided yet who should attend.  If Jim is out as I understand he is perhaps Rob Walls and I can attend.  This meeting should give us an opportunity to respond in the Washington context to the proposal that I understand is in the offing in Singapore.  We will then be in a position to feed that information back into the USG so that the President's meeting with the PM reflects the current state of discussions.


i want to see what my market value is.  i don't know what is going to happen here.  if you want to do a happy hour let me know.  maybe tomorrow after work or something.  let me know if you are up for it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i feel bad for you.  it must be stressful there.
let me know if you want to relax with a good
margarita this week.
are you going to start looking for something else, in case it goes
out of business or are you going to wait it out?
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >> ]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:44 PM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:
i am going to stay here.  i am going to the ut/a&m game on fri.  i am just
looking forward to hanging out and relaxing.  i need to get some sleep,
relax and get my mind off of enron.  seems like it is day to day on whether
or not we are going out of business.  it is wearing on me.
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 2:24 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:
   i'm probably going home wednesday night.  what about you--are you
   staying here or going home?
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >> ]
   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:12 PM
   To: Jilallen
   Subject: RE:
   r&r was fun.  we went downtown first and it sucked.  i felt like i was
   in
   kabul w/ all of al queda.  r&r was packed though.  i didn't get there
   until
   around 1am.  when are you going home?
       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 1:58 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:
      no, i didn't end up going out.  i went out friday night and felt hung
      over until
      about 5 on saturday, so i decided to take it easy.
      i heard you went to R&R.  how was it?  did you have a good time?
      i was going to call you yesterday to ask you about it.
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  <<
      File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  >> ]
      Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:40 PM
      To: Jilallen
      Subject: RE:
      what is going on?  did you end up going out on sat?
   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
      delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
      create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
      Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
   other
      party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
   by
      estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
      - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
      information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
      protected by law.  - If you are not the intended recipient, you
   should
      delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
      copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
      based on it, is strictly prohibited.
   This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
   information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
   protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
   delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
   message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
   prohibited.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Press Release Issued 26-Jan-00 1:14:00 PM ET
MCN Energy Group Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend

Full text of this press release available at:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=no&TICK=MCN&STORY=/www
/story/01-26-2000/0001124504&EDATE

Thank you for your interest
MCN Energy Group

Please Note: The above hyperlink may not retrieve the
web page if the address extends to more than one line.
If this should occur, please copy the full text of the
address and paste it into the address box in your web browser.