Thanks -- you're the best!  I'll let you know as soon as I get additional
info. kd

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/08/2001 06:05 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity

Be happy to if you think it's useful.  Just let me know what you'd like me to
do.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	05/07/2001 10:56 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity

I think this would be a good opportunity to have an Enron rep -- and I think
you would be perfect.  Are you available June 5?  Let me know so Marathon can
confirm.  THANK YOU!!! kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/07/2001
10:55 PM ---------------------------

Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 05/02/2001 12:00:23 PM
To: "'karen.denne@enron.com'" <karen.denne@enron.com>
cc: Joan Kradin <JKradin@marathon-com.com>

Subject: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity

Karen:

The Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce is hosting a series of meetings on the
power crisis and is interested in having a representative from Enron
participate in a panel discussion with John Stout, Vice President,
California Assets & Commercialization for Reliant Energy, and David Wiggs,
Gen. Mgr, LA Dept. of Water and Power, or Frank Salas from DWP.

The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 5, 2001 from 12:00 noon until 2:00
p.m. at the Chamber's offices located at 350 S. Bixel Street, Los Angeles,
CA

The meeting will be open to LA Chamber Membership.  A list of the Chamber's
board of directors is attached for your information.

Let me know if you are interested in sending a representative.

Thanks.

Sandra

-----Original Message-----
From: Zusman, Anita [mailto:zusman@lachamber.org]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:42 PM
To: 'syamane@marathon-com.com'
Cc: Infusino, Melissa
Subject:

Hi Sandra,

Got your voice mail message. Attached below is the roster of our Board of
Directors. I 'm sure Melissa will be in touch with you shortly to discuss
the speaker event. Thanks for your help.

Anita

 <<2001 ROSTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS.Public.doc>>

 - 2001 ROSTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS.Public.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 01/26/2000 05:57
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Reeves
01/26/2000 04:06 PM
To: Jeremy Wong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Adams/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Canada Intra-Month Currency Issues.

Jeremy,
In the last few months our intramonth books have seen very large swings in
their P&L due simply to currency positions.  The traders want to be able to
hedge this risk but the problem is that there are no reports in ERMS that
meet their currency information requirements.

We need reports similar to those reports which we are able to produce for our
term books

Crv Shift (Implicit)  - to show price curve shift by pub code
Curr Hedge   - to show currency curveshift by month
Implicit Position Report  - to show gas and USD positions by month
Top Page Canada  - to correctly bucket price curveshift verses currency
curveshift

We need these reports to work for all of our intramonth books (physical,
financial, gas daily).

physical postids:  accued: 698871, MTM: 698872
financial postid:     698876
gas daily:   698877

All of these reports currently work for our term books (698669) but none of
our intramonth books (there reports come out blank)

This issue  is of CRITICAL importance to us - our IM book is seeing
SIGNIFICANT swings in p&l due to currency exposure.  We had originally asked
for currency reports from you approx 6 months ago (requested by Walt).  We
now need this ASAP.

The most important IM book which we need reports for is the IM financial book
and the most important report we need in the Implicit Position Report.
I understand that this will take a considerable amout of your time but this
is VERY important to the profitability of Enron Canada.  Please call be to
dicuss a timeline.

Kathy (403-974-6735)


This is the memo that Sam sent back to Enron with a few revisions to my draft
procedures.  We are currently
 reviewing these changes and will discuss them during our conference call.

Ruth
---------------------- Forwarded by Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
06:37 AM ---------------------------

"Lee, Sam" <slee@Sithe.com> on 09/28/2000 01:12:19 PM
To: "'Ruth.Concannon@enron.com'" <Ruth.Concannon@enron.com>,
"'mroserberg@sithe.com'" <mroserberg@sithe.com>, "Oliver, Jason"
<joliver@Sithe.com>, "Hughes, Bill" <bhughes@Sithe.com>, "Fernandez, Bill"
<bfernandez@Sithe.com>, "Messina, Larry" <lmessina@Sithe.com>, "Lee, Sam"
<slee@Sithe.com>, "Maher, Janine" <jmaher@Sithe.com>, "Scherfling, Bob"
<bscherfling@Sithe.com>, "Grady, Mike" <mgrady@Sithe.com>
cc: "'Jeff.Donahue@enron.com'" <Jeff.Donahue@enron.com>,
Todd.Busby@enron.com, "Lee, Sam" <slee@Sithe.com>
Subject: Revised Procedures

Please see the revised procedures below:

 <<Sithe Empire Deal Procedures2.doc>>

 - Sithe Empire Deal Procedures2.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/12/99 11:34 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           11/12/99 10:30 AM

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Blackline of Legal Opinion

Per the request of Lorna, attached is a blackline of that legal opinion.


Dawn,

The deals look good in both Tagg and Sitara, but the link field in Tagg has
not been populated with the Sitara number.  When will this be ready?  Thanks.

DG    3-9573

Dawn C Kenne
12/19/2000 02:28 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: confirmation of deals

Darron,

Please take a look at these deals in Tagg Stage and Sitara parallel.  Look at
the pricing, risk book assignments, and the hedges in sitara (if needed).

Let me know if there is a problem.  If there is not, we want to roll this out
as soon as possible.

EOL #  Tagg #  Sitara#
123708  Q12851  4012471
123673  Q12662  4012421
123712  Q14284  4012503

Thanks for your help!

Dawn
3-9353


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."


you better be able to golf tomorrow.


In order for UBS Warburg to timely process your paycheck, I am requesting that all employee's accepting offers return any outstanding forms to my new desk location at  05852 on the 5th floor of ECS (Look for the Hamburg Flag) by noon this Friday  2/01/02.  This will prevent any benefit deductions from having to be "Double Deducted" on future checks.  Please attach a deposit slip or voided check stub to your direct deposit form.  Attached below are the forms needed for payroll/benefits, in case you did not turn these in at Orientation.  Lastly, please verify that your EHRonline home address is showing your current home address because all live checks will be mailed to your home residence.

Thanks, Tony Jarrett
Benefits
Ext. 3- 7829


The Second Extraordinary Session will begin Tuesday, May 15th to deal
with those legislative issues left in first session bills.  The
Legislature is still working on the exact process to convert first
sesssion bills into second session ones and maintain their status (if a
bill was in the second house, it would continue to be there).  We'll let
everyone know the new bill numbers and authors as soon as they are
known.


Robert,
As I suggested yesterday, I believe the Symposium title should include the
words: Leadership... Technology...Energy.

I am in the process of attempting to recruit a couple of key Steering
committee members.

re" *   CEO, CFO, COO, President and CTO's of top 100 companies, "excluding"
CEO's of top Energy companies.  (Did you mean "including"?)

I will try to join the telecon tomorrow but prior commitments may make that
difficult.

Thanks for all your work on this project.

Michael D. Burke
MDB Capital Ventures
210/269-7962

829 College Blvd.
San Antonio, TX 78209
210/269-7962
fax /826-0449
mdburkesa@aol.com

5252 Westchester  Suite 250
Houston, TX  77005
713/662-1982
fax /666-5227
mburke@entrix.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/12/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,853
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,363
Total Life to Date Transactions	519,543

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/12/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,139	76%
Enron Europe Limited	186	36%
Global Products	103	24%
Enron Metals	425	14%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,907,809,629
MTD	33,542,282,802
LTD	312,712,699,847
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,421,867,459

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,686,492,328

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	607
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	4
Number of Products Offered Today	1,046
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,256
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,979


Sounds good to me.  I'll see you tomorrow am!

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net>
	11/10/2000 11:44 AM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

Would you be ready to roll around 7:15 a.m.?  I will be glad to come to your
house.  Let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:12 AM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

It's just you and me tomorrow.  Soma is having furniture delivered from
Star and they said they could only come between 8-12.  So shall we drive
together?  Do you want to come to my house?  At what time?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:53 PM

Of course.  Do you two want to be there for the early show or I could just
meet you there later?

Also, you can sign up on the internet for the early bird show.  I don't
think you can pay when you get there, except if you go at 10 a.m.

www.houstonballet.org  Look it up here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:27 PM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: Re: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

I'm interested!  Would it be OK to invite one of my new business people
from London, she doesn't know anyone in Houston yet?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:01 PM

Miss Tana,

Are you interested in going to the Nutcracker Market this Saturday morning
and being there for the early bird special (8 a.m.)??  It costs $25 to get
in early, but that covers $10 admission, $5 parking, coffee and
refreshments.  Otherwise, you can go at 10 a.m., pay $10 to get in with the
rest of the crowd and $5 for parking.  I think I am going to plan to be
there around 7:40-7:45.  Let me know if you are interested.

Patti


...FYI..  Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Christie Patrick
04/25/2001 03:31 PM
To: Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT
cc: Kelly.Kimberly@enron.net, Christie.Patrick@enron.com,
Bob.Gates@enron.com, Scott.Vonderheide@enron.com, Michael.Terraso@enron.com,
Catherine.Mckalip-Thompson@enron.com

Subject: Re: Fact Sheet on Shareholder Proposal and Columbia Hills

Friends---I'm in quite a rush to catch a flight, so keep that in mind if my
comments aren't as articulate as we might prefer (though I did today again
speak personally with Lauren by phone, Paula Reiker [by coincidence of
meeting her alone in the elevator this morning], Steve Kean in person and
Mark palmer several times in person about this since our conference call
Friday. I think everyone has a good idea, first hand, of my thinking on this
matter.

Let's be careful not to try to pit the alleged Yakimas intervening in this
matter, against the "real" Tribe (even though we know there is divergence in
their respective  thinkings and radicalism).  This delicate situation can be
managed and I'm happy to handle it if needed.
 Keep in mind that Tribes work like most of our dysfunctional families:
you can tell me something bad about your mother and your brother can give me
a better opinion about her;  if I don't like your mother and try to use you
to defend my position against your brother, it's likely both you and your
brother will team up against me.  "sacred' grounds, even "alleged 'sacred
grounds' " are somewhat moving targets and somewhat personal--no matter how
wacky, one Indian wouldn't want to be put in a back-against-the-wall position
of denying another Indian's claim of sacred grounds.  Yet again let me say,
this situation between the groups is  manageable and I believe we can, when
necessary, work with the "real" Tribe in the same, very amicable way we've
been doing since 1997, to resolve this for the Wind Group should we ever
decide to go forward.

Here's a red-lined version of my comments.

Thanks--I'll be travelling through Tuesday morning, but can be reached
through all the usual alternative routes (phone mail is best--3-6117).

Thanks!!---Christie.


As you have already heard, California Municipal Utilities Association filed a
complaint with FERC asking for cost based rates. The following is a brief
outline of an EPMI/EES answer to the complaint.  The answer is due Friday.
Please send me any comments ASAP.

? The complaint should be rejected because it wrongly assumes that the
Commission has no option to ensure just and reasonable rates but to require
cost based rates because there is no low cost solution to the problems
currently faced by the California markets.  We should attach our white paper
to our protest and state that the paper explains how these problems could be
solved at little or no cost to the customers.
? I list here, for your information, the reasons CMUA claims that markets are
not competitive (these reasons will not be re-listed in the pleading).
? 2000 prices greatly exceeded 1999 prices without regard to load.
? zonal constrained prices, even in the off-peak hours, do not reflect
competitive outcomes for low load conditions.
? even small players can be price setters
? The changes required are additional generation, transmission, and demand
response and will cost tens of millions of dollars and take lengthy periods
of time to implement.
? There is no evidence that markets will ensure just and reasonable rates in
the near future.
? CMUA asserts that with the advent of electric restructuring, the Commission
has increasingly allowed energy and ancillary services to be sold at
market-based rates.  However, CMUA is wrong in the context of the West where
there has been market-based trading of electricity before electric
restructuring, since the FERC approved the Western Systems Power Pool,s
contract in 1991.  The Commission,s rules didn,t create the wholesale market
in the past, the market did and it was running fine until it was messed up by
certain market rules were imposed that are enumerated in our paper.  The
problem is not the market-based rates.  The problem is the market rules.
? CMUA,s motion does not address how market-based rates would be calculated
for marketers that do not sell power from their own resources, let alone
reflect the trading of basis points.  Almost all of the power EPMI sells is
power it has bought from some other marketer or generator.  Many of EPMI,s
deals are done through brokers such that EPMI does not find out the identity
of the seller until after a deal has been struck.  Accordingly, EPMI gets no
information about the cost of the underlying generation.
? If FERC doesn,t try to fix the market but simply takes away our
market-based rates, since there,s is no basis for us to set cost based rates,
we would go out of business.  Besides there,s no reason to take away our
market-based rates because we are not exercising market power.  So if FERC
could fix the problem with a less onerous solution (as we,ve proposed in our
white paper), requiring cost-based rates would constitute a regulatory taking
of our business and we would have to be compensated using the constitutional
standard.
 CMUA does not provide any expert testimony to support its position.  Rather,
its evidence is &drawn from materials prepared and testimony delivered by the
California ISO and other public sources.8  Beyond the difficult evidentiary
issue posed by the fact that CMUA cannot swear to the veracity of information
produced by third parties, EPMI would have no opportunity to conduct
discovery or cross-examine of such &witnesses.8


ok

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:43 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Cc: Underwood, Jody; Dernehl, Ginger; Noske, Linda J.
Subject: RTO Project

We should probably think about a trip to DC (if not next week the following week) to meet with the QG folks and possibly Public Opinion Strategies to discuss our RTO effort and development of messages.

Please let me know if you're interested in attending this meeting so I can set something up.

Thanks.


Great work, gentlemen.
Thank you for your efforts.

Ron

Mark Fisher
05/24/2002 03:24 PM
To: Stan Ballard/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Cousineau/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON,
Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jimmy
Chandler/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Trent ATP test

Stan,

I have dropped the resulting graphs in your transfer directory. You'll find
the graphs for Wind Speed, Nacelle Position, and Power in Trent_graphs.pdf,
for each of these graphs you should find 144 records. The production graphs
are in Trent _graphs_production.pdf, for each of these graphs you should find
261-262 records (5.5 minutes between records). Both of these look very good
for the 15th (5:00 am UTC to 5:00 am UTC on the 16th). All 100 turbines are
represented and all appear to have at the very worst 98% data recovery, most
were near 100%.

I don't remember if the Trent test needed the summaries of the counters and
availability calculations, but those in as trent011502.pdf if you need/want
them. Finally, I have provided the zip file if you need to provide these
graphs to someone else.

The results look good to me, so unless you find something wrong, it looks
like a pass!

Mark Fisher


All,

A Trading Track meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 12th at 3.00 pm , conference room 3321 to discuss:

Existing Participants:		Current/Future Rotations/ expected graduation dates
New Hire:			Future Rotations/expected graduation dates

Attached for your review is the updated rotational list (I have included previous rotations as per a request)

Kind Regards,

Karen B.
x54667


Attached is a ruling issued yesterday by Commissioner Wood directing that ESPs and customers file copies of direct access contracts with the Commission by December 3.  The contracts will be available to ALL other parties who sign a "suitable" protective order.  The Ordering Paragraphs read as follow:

1.     By December 3, 2001, any party who believes that it has a direct access contract or agreement potentially affected by an order to suspend direct access as of July 1, 2001 or a date earlier than September 20, 2001, shall submit a true and correct copy of each of the actual contracts or agreements along with any arguments as to the impact of such an order.  A failure to submit this information for the Commission's consideration will be considered a waiver of the arguments related to claims involving the contracts and agreements.  Initially, the true and correct copy of each of the actual contracts or agreements shall be filed under seal with the Commission's Docket Office and served on Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Robert Barnett.

2.     Office of Ratepayer Advocates shall work with the parties who have executed direct access contracts or agreements to develop a proposed protective order and nondisclosure agreement for Commission staff, which shall be submitted to ALJ Barnett by December 3.

3.     The electric service providers and customers who are parties shall work with other parties and shall jointly submit a proposed protective order and nondisclosure agreement that will cover parties other than Commission staff by December 11, 2001.

4.     Parties' supplemental comments to the comments they filed in response to the October 23rd Assigned Commissioner Ruling shall be submitted by January 4, 2002.

As a preliminary matter, of course, AReM and WPTF do not, in their own names, have direct access contracts.  However, certain members of AReM and WPTF are direct parties to the proceeding and need to consider what course they wish to take.  The group also needs to consider if they wish to fight this Order on Constitutional or procedural grounds.  I will be considering our options and get back to you with more detail.  However, as a very preliminary analysis, it is evident that the Commission does not have jurisdiction over either ESPs or the customers they serve.  The request is also particularly outrageous because of the statements that, "A failure to submit this information for the Commission's consideration will be considered a waiver of the arguments related to the claims involving the contracts and agreements" and "Parties to this proceeding may have access to these contracts and agreements after the appropriate protective order and nondisclosure agreements are in effect."  The former is a likely denial of due process and the latter exposes proprietary contracts and pricing information to ESP competitors and exposes sensitive pricing information to competitors of energy-dependent customers.

Your thoughts would be appreciated.  My initial reaction  is that this is time for ESPs and customer groups, such as CMTA, ABAG, CLECA, CIU, EPUC, SPURR, etc., to band together and fight this at multiple levels, from the Governor's Office on down, including in the media.  Your thoughts would be very much appreciated.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>


yes, I think that's the idea. You may need to monitor and advise.


FYI.
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
01:42 PM ---------------------------

Stuart Staley
12/03/2000 04:59 PM
To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: STATS FOR NOV 2000

FYI - some general stats on the Int'l coal and freight businesses for the
period Sept-Nov

-employees
-tons transacted
-# of transactions
-tons shipped
-MTM income

Call w/ Q's,

Stu

---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Staley/LON/ECT on 03/12/2000 22:59
---------------------------

	From:  Patryk Wlodarski                           01/12/2000 18:37

To: Frank Prejean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Andy
James/EU/Enron@Enron, Chris Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: STATS FOR NOV 2000

  Rgds
  Patryk


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
07/26/2000 09:06 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: offsite agenda

Here is my agenda for the offsite.


I have sent Janet Covington the participant list as requested per her e-mail
below.  She has agreed to set up the conference call for Thursday, May 3rd at
3 PM central time.  Please reserve this time.  I will forward each of you the
spreadsheet we receive from them today.  I will let you know if I think we
should get together to review the spreadsheet prior to the call.

Thanks,

Wanda Curry
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/EES on 05/02/2001 09:58
AM ---------------------------

Diann Huddleson
05/02/2001 08:01 AM
To: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Follow up conference call

Wanda, I spoke with Janet after you forwarded her voice mail.  I told her we
would provide the participant list this morning.  Let me know if you want me
to do that.

---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 05/02/2001
08:00 AM ---------------------------

Janet.Covington@sce.com on 05/01/2001 03:46:06 PM
To: dhuddles@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Follow up conference call

Hi Diann,

I just left a phone message for Wanda as I didn't have her email and was
supposed to coordinate the follow up call with her.  Anyway, we are still
working on preparing the account examples demonstrating the change in
methodology and should have those to you by tomorrow.  In the meantime, I
wanted to go ahead and arrange the follow up call for this Thursday 5/3 at
1pm PST.  That would be 3pm your time.  Can you please let me know the
email addresses for your participants so I can get a notice out to them.

I had yourself, Wanda Curry, Evan Hughes, Jeff Dodson, Bob Williams, Jim
Doth, and Martin Curtilan?  Not sure of the spelling.  Please let me know
so I can send out the meeting notice out with the call in details.

Thanks Much.

Janet L. Covington
Account Manager
ESP/AMS Services Division
SSID Administration Bldg., First Floor
7300 Fenwick Lane
Westminster, CA  92683
Phone: 714-895-0198 (54198)
Fax: 714-895-0347 (54347)
covingjl@sce.com


Mark, may I have off as vacation days Dec. 29 (a Friday) and Jan. 2
(following Tues.)?  please let me know;  thanks-- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


Kay, John Klauberg forwarded your email requesting a "fatal flaw" review
under Connecticut law and also your question relating to the granting of a
security interest under the agreement.  The agreement does not appear to have
any "fatal flaws" with respect to enforceability under Connecticut law.
There are no liquidated damages provisions or "sole" remedy provisions that
are often times problematic.  The contract does contain a rather extensive
force majeure provision which we have not fully analyzed under Connecticut
law, but the provision appears to be reasonably drafted and should not be a
problem.  If you would like, we can take a closer look at it for precedents
under Connecticut law.

As to the granting of the security interest and the filing of financing
statements, we think that these provisions are reasonable for this type of
contract and merely provide the seller with a mechanism for perfecting its
security interest.  I have attached a memorandum that addresses this issue
under Connecticut law.  Please call me at the number set forth below if you
have any questions regarding this email or the attached memorandum, or if I
may be of any other assistance.

Regards.
Chuck Welsh

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by
return mail, e-mail or at (860) 293-3723.  The unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Charles R. Welsh
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
Goodwin Square
225 Asylum Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06103
(860) 293-3723
Email: cwelsh@llgm.com

 - memotoch.DOC


At Enron, we,re good at a lot of things:  making markets, commoditizing
products, managing risk, offering innovative energy solutions to customers )
the list goes on and on.  However, one of the things we could do a lot better
is watching our expenses.  We,re all shareholders in this company, and we
need to spend our company,s dollars as wisely as we spend our own.

There are some simple, yet significant measures each of us can take to make
sure we,re careful with Enron,s money.  The Policy Committee has approved and
recommended the following:

? Professional Services ) This is our largest area of discretionary spending,
at more than $600 million last year. &Professional Services8 includes our
contracts with outside law and accounting firms, contractors and other
consulting groups.  To make sure that we are negotiating the best rates and
terms of service for the company across business units, we are requiring all
future professional service contracts and those up for renewal to be
negotiated through or in consultation with Global Strategic Sourcing (GSS),
effective July 1.  In addition, contracts for more than $5,000 must be
pre-approved by the business unit senior executive or their designee and
GSS.  For more information, see http://ibuyit.enron.com.

? On-line expense reporting tool XMS ) XMS, our online expense reporting
tool, enables us to expedite, monitor and report expenses.  Effective July 1,
all employees on domestic U.S. payroll will be required to use XMS for
reimbursement of business-related expenses. To access XMS, go to
http://xms.enron.com/.

? Enterprise wide portal ) We currently have 122 internal web sites across
the company.  The amount of technology work, marketing collateral, and other
related costs required to develop and support so many portals is sizeable.
It makes sense to have one Enron portal so you can efficiently access content
and services through a single, personalized channel that will make it easier
for you to find information and perform basic tasks online.  This new
company-wide portal, under the leadership of Tony Mends, will be launched in
several phases beginning this fall.

Another significant area where we can be more diligent in our spending is
travel and entertainment.  Enron has long had travel policies in place.  As
we have grown, we have not done as well as we should have in communicating
those policies to new employees and reminding all employees to take advantage
of the discounts we have negotiated.  The availability of discounts and
booking services online should make it easy to save money for the company
without sacrificing the comfort of employees who travel.  The following are
common sense recommendations that we should all adhere to when traveling for
business.  Any regular deviations from these travel policy recommendations
will be reviewed by each business unit leader.

? Air travel ) Employees are requested to use either Travel Agency in the
Park (TAP) or the GSS-approved preferred travel agency for your location -
all of which have access to the significant airfare discounts negotiated by
GSS - or http://clicktrip.enron.com/enron, the new online travel booking
service that allows employees to book their own travel with the same
negotiated discounts.  Employees who fly in the United States should book
non-refundable coach tickets, which are typically 65 percent less than
refundable tickets and can usually be changed by simply paying a $100 fee.
For this reason, we strongly encourage all employees to purchase
non-refundable domestic coach tickets when possible.

? Lodging ) GSS has also negotiated preferred rates at a number of hotel
chains in many cities worldwide to accommodate each business unit,s
individual hotel policy.  We recommend that you use Enron,s list of preferred
hotels to select accommodations that are in line with your business unit,s
policies.  You can view the list at http://travel.enron.com.

? Car rental services ) When renting a car for business travel, employees
should use our preferred car rental agencies ) National (U.S. and Canada) and
Alamo (U.S.)- since the agreements we have negotiated are intended to protect
you and Enron through the insurance coverage in our contract.  Visit
http://travel.enron.com for details and updates to services available outside
the U.S.

? Off-site meetings ) All domestic-U.S. off-site meetings and events with
more than 10 people should be coordinated through GSS, which will negotiate
preferred rates for Enron.  They can be reached at (713) 646-8311.

Because there are differences between business units and offices, each
business unit leader will follow up this memo with a communication further
elaborating on these policies as they apply to their business unit.

Each of us has a responsibility to make sure we do our part to ensure Enron
retains its competitive edge.  These recommendations are some basic, sensible
actions we can take company-wide, but it is up to every employee to look for
cost saving measures and do what makes sense in your daily activities.  If
you have an idea or a suggestion you would like to share with us, please
e-mail us at recommendationsforcostsavings@enron.com.   A list of questions
and answers about these policies is posted on
http://ibuyit.enron.com/gss/ibuyit/csfaq.doc.  If you have additional
questions, Policy Committee member Kevin Hannon will host an eSpeak on
Tuesday, June 19 at 10 a.m. Houston time to discuss these cost saving
recommendations.


did you buy enron this morning?


How do you bait your hook?

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - penisfish.jpg


The report named: Power Off-Peak Positions <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=20&report_name=Power+Off-Peak+Positions&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/19/2001>, published as of 10/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Ben, Matthew, Jim, Jason:

As per discussion, I have created a common folder
o:naes/from_ko/LM6000s/Control, for storage of the cost configuation model
and finanicial base model.

Since Ben has to model Lincoln by next week, I suggest we use his model as
the go forward base model from now onwards. By modeling an actual
transaction, it would be easier for us to identify needed changes and links.

If you guys have time, please look thru the model and list the changes
needed. We could then have a meeting next week to go through the suggestions
and discuss how to coordinate taking turns working on the model.

Ben:

I will continue making cosmetic changes to the model for now, but I would
make sure that the changes do not mess up the economics of the transaction.

Everyone:

If any of you need to model anything, please use this base model. If you do
not have access to the directory, please create a security request form
through lotus notes.

Thanks.


It's our understanding that the FERC will now be considerting at a Friday
meeting its order on the California invetsigation.  Lysa Akin is setting up
an audio connection.  Lysa, please contact Dennis, Jubron and Neil about this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 10:42 AM
---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 12/11/2000 12:30 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

Mary --

Can you make sure that the EES is looped in to the call?  Neil, I've heard
that FERC may move the meeting to Friday.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 12:07 PM -----

	Neil Bresnan@EES
	12/11/2000 09:30 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Will you make sure we are in the loop with the FERC meeting on the 13th ?  We
may want our own log in down here on the desk. Can you let us know how that
is done and what the cost is.

Thanks


Ken,  Please review the attached.


I would love to do that!!  And like I said, I realized I have every right to
go out with a friend (girl or boy) if I want to.  If he wants to be
insecure, then that's his problem.  Does your offer still stand??  If so,
when?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: what doing?

Yeah tell me about it.  So the reason I called to see if you wanted to do
something last week was because I got a settlement on my some of my dads
insurance shit and I wanted to go out to a nice dinner.  I thought it would
be a nice opportunity for us to hang out and catch up.  I hope you don't
still think that I didn't want to see you that night because you are dating
dave, I just had to run some errands right when you called back.


I see that I failed to include thte attachments.  Here is the entire package.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001
01:54 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           05/25/2001 01:37 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Williams/ENRON@enronxgate, Phillip
K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Responses to FERC Data Request

Attached are the cover letter and narrative responses ENA will provide this
afternoon to FERC for the non-public investigation into California natural
gas prices.  Please advise me as soon as possible if you have any concerns.

These are basically requests for the same information as we have provided
previously in the San Diego  and the CPUC complaint proceedings.  The main
difference is in the time period covered.  The San Diego and CPUC data
requests were for November-December, 2000 and January-April, 2001,
respectively, and this request is for information from May 1999 for any
contracts in effect on May 10, 2001.

I am still waiting for the files with the actual data, and I will forward
them as soon as available.


Attached is the spreadsheet for the Red Rock Expansion administrative contract #27698.  Please let me know if you have any questions.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


John and Louise -- Nationwide RTO information is now on the East Power web site:

http://eastpower.dev.corp.enron.com/portal/
(under RTO Regulation Module (access and add through the Content page).

and on the West Power web site.

 These summaries will be updated bi-weekly and are also accessible to Rogers Herndon and Don Black's EES trading groups.


Thanks!  We are looking forward to it in a big way--mostly because its still
winter up in the big O!  df

From: Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 07:54 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Organization Announcement

Drew,

Congratulations!  I can think of no better person for the job!  I look
forward to seeing you in the hallways of the Enron Building!  I hope you and
your family will love living in Houston as John and I do.  See you soon, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


There will be a Staff Meeting with Kevin Presto TODAY in 32c2 from 4 - 5pm.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Very good cross over of ideas - I will push Andy to see the communication
expand - there must be substantive correlation between these physical
businesses at the operational level !!

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 24/01/2001 13:53
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           23/01/2001 23:40

To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill
Lafave/ENRON@enronXgate, Delmar Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel
Hamilton/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: Metals

Andy,

Thanks so much for your message.  I had you on my "To Do" list today to
follow-up from our conversation last week.  I appreciate your responses, and
will follow-up as needed.

Just to recap EIM's current inititives.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) was engaged in 10/00 to develop a business plan
for tactical and strategic solutions for the projected growth in the physical
business.  In 11/00, AA was engaged to develop a "Blueprint" of EIM major
processes (Deal Execution, Deal Capture, Risk Management, Logistics,
Settlements and Financial Reporting), down to level 2 processes.  The
initiatives have been combined into one team focused on delivering the
"Blueprint", a gap analysis of Enron systems to business needs and
recommended systems.  A complete "roadmap" should be laid out with a
0-3months, 4-6months, 7-9 months and 10-12months timeline.  The plan
addresses tactical also.

Our overall objective:  Build an infrastructure (people, processes and
systems) that is scalable and supports the trading business of EIM.  The
current industries are Forest Products and Steel.  However, additional
industries may be added.  The targeted infrastructure would require little
change to support new industries.

The delieverable is expected by the end of 2/01.  We'd be happy to visit with
you all (video conference or Houston,....) to give you more information.  Let
me know how to proceed.

Thanks again for your time.  Since I wasn't able to attend the Controllers'
Conference last 10/00, I'm glad I got to meet you last week.  Stay in touch.

Brenda

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Metals

Brenda

As discussed at our meeting last week there are a few areas of commonality
between Enron Metals and EIM that should allow leverage off common goals.

In particular I promised info on a few areas:

Project Q assessment

A lot of the issues raised in the report are particular to Enron Metals
(being to do with interfaces with our AS400 ysstem) however high level issues
which formed part of the decision to not develop this for Enron metals were:
Q is over specified for metals. Traffic / logistics for metals is less
complex than oil & coal.
Metals process tends towards Buy>Store>Sell whereas for liquids the storage
is not as prevelant
Metals logistics typically involves trucks whereas liquids is ship/barge

2.    Inventory Controls

Again the reports produced here have been very specific to Enron Metals. Paul
Wallace a manager in the co-ordination function is working extensively on
developing the controls in this area. I would suggest that you contact Paul
directly if you wish to discuss specific areas or inventory controls in
general.

3.    Funding of inventory

We have a structured finance facility here in London. The deal is specific to
Enron Metals markets in that it works by reference to LME prices as these are
the base index for all the positions placed in the facility. If structured
financing is sort for EIM then it would be appropriate to talk to either
David Tregar (Metals Commercial) or Bill Appleby (Global Finance) as an intro
to the issues faced.

4.    Curve Management Process

The markets in which our merchanting division trades are based on the LME
curves but are linked to a large number of basis curves for quality and
location. Given the vast number we have opted to break down the markets by
brand group and port location. E.G. for Copper this means we have a grid with
5 brand groups and 3 sets of port groups (13 for europe, 7 for the US and 6
for the Far East). The maintaince & price testing of the grids is made
manageable by the fact the premiums only need be entered for brand and port
groups by the traders yet prices can be tested by reference to node points
i.e. price of  specific brand at a given location which can be checked to a
market quote.

5.    Re recruitment of paper traders

I haven't been able to contact him but I recall that the brother of David
Rosenblum, one of the metals traders in Chicago, is a trader of recylced
paper.

I'll keep you posted on long term system development plans here in London.
I'd appreciate same for EIM.

Regards
Andy


Columbia is taking expressions of interest in a project they are calling the
Homestead expansion for firm (or possibly off-peak or seasonal firm)
transportation into Operating Areas 1 and 10.  The open season will end on
1/19/01.  The project could include Columbia working with another pipeline in
the region, such as Transco to deliver more volumes using Transco's South
Virginia lateral or CNG to deliver more volumes on the PL-1 line.  The
project could include expanding Columbia's own line into Market Areas 33 and
34 through looping or added compression.  Columbia is also considering
building a line away from Loudoun, where LNG volumes will be delivered from
the Cove Point pipeline, to power projects in Loudoun or Fauquier Counties in
Virginia.  Columbia has also considered an idea in the past to build a line
from the Cove Point terminal to BG&E through Calvert and Anne Arundel
Counties.  Columbia indicated that they have talked with Bill Fox of
VNG/ALG.  Columbia would like to talk with us concerning VNG, Hopewell or any
other needs that we might have.

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Mark Breese @ ECT                           11/20/2000 10:29 AM

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:

Can you find out about columbia's Homestead expansion?  RE:  its
applicability to VNG


Just a note to let you know we have changed our fee structure with NGX.

As of April 1, we are no longer paying any fee for deals beyond the prompt
month.

Thanx,

Chris


Keith,

Here are the procedures for the East.  The West is not currently running option sensitivities.

Approximately every one to two weeks or as requested by the options traders an option sensitivity report is run using PortCalc.  Three parameters are tested:  Price (increments from -5 to +5), monthly Volatility (increments from -25% to +25%), and Time (increments up to 90 days.  (Reminder:  the increments are changeable)  The data is imported from PortCalc into an Excel pivot table.  The pivot table is then used to show how the various Greeks (delta, gamma, theta and Vega) change for each trader's book, generally with a 3 month look ahead.  The data can also be sorted by and grouped by other criteria, if requested, such as by region and delivery date These reports are given to the East option traders only.

Thanks,
Stacey


As you know, exceeding this limit would require contacting the Enron Board of
Directors.  Jeff Skilling is keenly interested in this measurement.  In
conversations with Ted Murphy today, Jeff has asked that he receive a daily
report from Ted on component V@R.  Ted called me about 3:00 pm today (Houston
time) to let me know about this requirement.  Obviously, we want to meet
Skilling's request with information that is as timely, accurate and  complete
as possible.  Therefore, we were concerned about feeds from London that over
the past several weeks have caused one London commodity or another to be
excluded from the first run of component V@R.  (Mike:  I assume that you are
very familiar with these feed problems from your representative that you send
to the daily 8:30 meeting.)

I pulled Steve Stock out of a pre-PRC meeting to meet with Ted, Shona, Ramesh
and me at 4:00 today.  Realizing that the time was very late in London, we
tried to reach you both at home numbers and by cell phone to include you in
the meeting.  Since we could not do so, we continued without you given that
Skilling will want to see this report daily starting tomorrow.

Here is the key fact to know:  It takes 3 hours to run the component V@R
calculations, once all inputs have been received and processed.  The
Component V@R calculations are kicked off at 6:30 am Houston time, producing
an approximate completion time of 9:30 am Houston time.   With this
timeframe, our goal would be to have the component V@R report to Jeff by
approximately 10:00 am Houston time.

Given current calculation times, in order to consistently calc component V@R
including all London feeds, London books (UK power, UK gas and Nordic power)
will have to be completed, calculated and officialized by 4:00 am Houston
time (10:00 am London time).  If this time frame is not met, then component
V@R reports for Jeff will be incomplete.  We had hoped to discuss this with
you today so that you could work with your operations staff, systems support
and traders to insure that you could consistently meet a 10:00 am London
requirement for officialized books.

The other immediate action to take is to ask Mike to work with David Hardy on
what we understand to be an almost-completed task of including UK spread
options in V@R calculations using the V@R engine.  Those V@R calculations
that are done through Excel calculations are not captured and included in the
component V@R calculations.  While there are other commodities that will
currently be excluded from component V@R reports, they are deemed to be less
material than the UK spread options.  Ramesh felt that it is only a matter of
days before this is completed.  Mike, we would like for you to stay on top of
this from an operations perspective to insure that this happens.

I should note that the firm 10:00 am deadline for officializing books in the
UK will only result in producing a report for Jeff by 10:00 am Houston time.
We don't know what Jeff's expectation will be regarding timing.  It is
probably safe to say that we should be actively looking at process and
systems changes that could result in the ability to deliver such a report
earlier in the morning.

Mike, I will call you during my morning commute on Thursday to see whether or
not you have any questions or if there are concerns about consistently
meeting the 10:00 am deadline in London.


This type of shit always happens to Crowell.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

Scott.Crowell@us.cgeyc.com on 02/28/2001 03:08:05 PM
To: GBauer@mtlm.com, drewbeckman@hotmail.com, acaeg@yahoo.com,
jcarlisle@carltonstaffing.com, colirma@yahoo.com, mike.fultz@halliburton.com,
dgiron@enron.com, chad.glessman@bankofamerica.com, bsjones@us.oracle.com,
Dawn.C.Kenne@enron.com, jennifer_kern@yahoo.com,
Crystal_Kettle@neimanmarcus.com, rachellapworth@yahoo.com,
j_liberman@hotmail.com, Phillip.M.Love@enron.com, carriebird69@hotmail.com,
MikeMullen@mail.house.gov, KARENHMUR@aol.com, jnagy@intraspect.com,
charity.naiser@us.pwcglobal.com, PattiS7@aol.com,
srasmussen362@earthlink.net, CRoberson@ASAPSC.COM, yhs_91@yahoo.com,
leslie.salyer@lyondell.com, sassytxn7@aol.com, msherbak@texas.net,
csiddons@comscore.com, whitneysiddons@phoenixdsl.com, rsole@us.oracle.com,
mandy.spencer@hostcentric.com, kc.stevens@ntlworld.com,
Jennifer_Thomas@amsinc.com, mikepthomas@yahoo.com, sheri.thomas@enron.com,
bentsuch@yahoo.com, jtwebb@seagullsw.com, nmw14@yahoo.com, bigluv54@aol.com,
slsdfy@earthlink.net, nateandmichelle@home.com
cc:
Subject: Pics  [CGEY Virus checked]

Here's us in at dinner during Mardi Gras with the New Orleans MTV Real
World cast.

(See attached file: realworld1.jpg)(See attached file: realworld2.jpg)

Scott Crowell
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Consulting
Senior Consultant - Oracle High Growth

214.665.5751  office
214.543.9093  cellular

______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
system. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young is neither liable for the proper and
complete transmission of the information contained in this communication
nor for any delay in its receipt.
 - realworld1.jpg
 - realworld2.jpg


Can anyone help me with these agency agreements?

Marlene Hilliard
---------------------- Forwarded by Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Marlene Hilliard
02/20/2001 10:44 AM
To: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Heal/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Agency Agreements

All, I am searching for a copy of an executed agency agreements for the
following contracts.  If you are in possession of the executed agency
agreement or know the contact person I can retrieve the executed agency
agreement, please forward the agency agreement to me or let me know the
person to contact, either at Enron North America Corp. or the contact person
for the shipper.

I need a response ASAP.

ENA agent for

 Counterparty    Effective Date   Pipeline

1.  Kerr-McGee Corporation       01/01/2000 Venice Gathering Gathering System
and TRANSCO
2.  Petsec Energy, Inc.
02/01/2000                                      Venice Gathering System, LLC
3.  Devonian Resources, Inc.
01/01/2000                                       Somerset Gas Transmission
4.  Patrick
Shipley
01/01/2000                                        Somerset Gas Transmission
5.  Devon Energy Corporation
01/01/2000                                        Reliant Energy Field
Services
6.  Tenaska Gas Company
10/01/2000                                        TXU Gas Distribution
7.  City of
Pasadena
03/01/1998                                        Pacific Gas & Electric
Company
8.  Allegheny Ludlum Corporation
07/01/1999                              Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
9.Commonwealth Energy, Inc.
06/01/1999                                                   Norse Pipeline,
LLC
10.  Columbia Energy Marketing Corporation
12/01/1999                                        TRANSCO, CGAS, and

  Dominion Transmission, Inc.
11.  Columbia Energy Marketing Corporation
10/01/1999                                           Midcoast Interstate
12.  Crescendo Energy, LLC
10/01/2000                                          Wildhorse Energy Partners
13.  Enron Canada Corp.
01/01/2001                                       TransCanada Pipelines Limited

EPMI agent for

14.  West Fork Development Company
04/01/2000                                          Midwestern Gas Marketing
15.West Fork Development Company
05/01/2000                                          Midwestern Gas
Transmission
16.  Gleason Power I, L.L.C.
04/01/1999                                           ANR Pipeline Company

Thanks for your assistance in this matter.

Marlene Hilliard


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041621.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 21 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schmidt, Ann M.
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:47 PM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Management Committee Survey

Mark,

Attached is the updated survey for your files.  Let me know if you need more changes made.  Thanks, A.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:40 PM
---------------------------
From: Linda Hallmark@ENRON on 02/20/2001 04:34 PM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 1999 Tax Settlement


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 11:36
AM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
12/07/2000 11:26 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: put on collar

I re-compiled Exotica.xll, so that the xcol function is a put on collar.

De-add in your Exotica. Add this special one. And use xcol for put.

Then delete the Exotica_xcol_putoncollar.xll

We will build in this functionality in near future.

Zimin

Paulo,

Can you add a flag to xcol function so that we can choose a put or call from
the
spreadsheet ?

Thanks.

Zimin


Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


Fyi.  Lynn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Odneal, Dave <Dave.Odneal@ENRON.com>
To: Stevens, Bob <Bob.Stevens@ENRON.com>; Dornan, Dari <Dari.Dornan@ENRON.com>; Rice, Randy <Randy.Rice@ENRON.com>; Fowler, Bill <Bill.Fowler@ENRON.com>; Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
CC: Neubauer, Dave <Dave.Neubauer@ENRON.com>; Kirk, Steve <Steve.Kirk@ENRON.com>; Corman, Shelley <Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com>
Sent: Sat Nov 24 19:12:03 2001
Subject: RE: Duluth Bypass Draft Letter Agreement

Bob,
To refresh my memory, why is the City of Duluth wanting to review our operating records?
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Bob
Sent: Wed 11/21/2001 2:35 PM
To: Dornan, Dari; Rice, Randy; Fowler, Bill; Blair, Lynn
Cc: Neubauer, Dave; Kirk, Steve; Odneal, Dave; Corman, Shelley
Subject: Duluth Bypass Draft Letter Agreement

Please call me at 952-887-1782 if you have any questions.

<<CAF - duluth.doc>> <<Nov_2001_Agreement.doc>> <<CAF - duluth.doc>>


Not a bad wire story - relevant for our conference call later today. Reuters
in London called me at breakfast yesterday, then Mark gave them some on the
record comments later. See quote. I had pointed them at lessons to be learnt
in relation to Spain and Netherlands, and you will see there are a couple of
mentions of those countries (though only in context of interconnection
capacity) towards the end of the piece. I think other relevant lessons would
be related to perils of allowing retail and wholesale (esp. pools for
residual capacity) markets to be divorced in regulatory terms one from the
other. Difference from California, however, is that the divorce in Spain and
Netherlands works currently to detriment of new entrants and to the benefit
of vertically integrated incumbents.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:59
AM ---------------------------

Iona Maclean
01/12/2001 08:24 AM
To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex
Parsons/EU/Enron@Enron, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Green/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis- Reuters- Enron
mention

---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 12/01/2001 07:25
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 11/01/2001 18:14:54
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 216668@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK:    ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off
California power crisis.

UK:
ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis.
By Stuart Penson

01/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Jan 11 (Reuters) - California's electricity crisis has sent jitters
through the European power industry but the continent, better supplied than
the U.S. state, will continue down the path of liberalisation, analysts said
on Thursday.

"California is definitely going to help us recognise that there are potential
problems in Europe," said Katharina Gassner, power analyst at the UK's Oxford
Economic Research Associates (OXERA).
"But we would certainly expect those problems to be ironed out as
(liberalised) markets evolve in Europe."

Acute power shortages in California have triggered a surge in wholesale
prices, causing the state's two biggest utilities - Pacific Gas & Electric and
Southern California Edison - to run up costs of $12 billion which cannot be
passed on to customers because prices are capped under state law.

The meltdown of California's flawed experiment in power deregulation has
alerted European regulators to the pitfalls of opening up energy markets to
competition.

But analysts say Europe's ample supplies of electricity mean it will make the
switch to competitive markets without the threat of utility bankruptcies and
blackouts now faced by America's richest state.

The European Union's power markets are opening up to competition under a
European Union Directive which came into force in 1999.

California's crisis, which is sending ripples through financial markets and
topping the agenda of U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, is rooted in a
shortage of power and an apparently unbalanced deregulation model, analysts
say.

Electricity consumption, fuelled by California's high-tech industrial base, is
far outstripping local supply which has not grown significantly for years.

New power projects were a rarity in the 1990s as environmental constraints,
bureaucratic delays and regulatory uncertainty put off investors.

EUROPE HAS POWER SURPLUS

By contrast, most European markets have a significant surplus of power. This
is most evident in Germany, mainland Europe's biggest market, where power
prices crashed after liberalisation in 1998.

"Anyone who assumes what is happening in California is going to happen in
Europe is really not understanding the situation," said Nigel Evans, managing
director in Europe for Energy consulting company Caminus.

"The supply/demand fundamentals in Europe are vastly different to California."

Supply is tighter in Europe's fastest growing markets, like Spain and Ireland.
But unlike in California, there is no shortage of companies prepared to build
new generation.

"I don't think there is any evidence of the system coming under real stress in
any European markets," said David Smol of UK-based consultants Ilex.

"There is lots of new investment on the block."

CALIFORNIA POWER PRICES ROCKET

The Californian price increases, mainly seen on the California Power Exchange,
have been higher than fundamentals justify, said Mark Schroeder, a vice
president of European government and regulatory affairs at U.S. energy group
Enron .

"Prices on the exchange reflect the need to recoup stranded costs rather than
true market fundamentals," he said.

The utilities cannot pass the costs on to retail customers because retail
rates, unlike liberalised wholesale prices, are frozen under state
deregulation laws.

Europe's deregulation plan contains a staggered timetable of market opening
that brings competition ultimately to all consumers, from big industrial
consumers down to private households.

But European liberalisation is not problem free. Transmission bottlenecks are
restricting supply on the borders of France, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands.

Prices in Spain and the Netherlands have been forced higher recently as a
result of constraints on interconnection, much of which is used under
long-term supply deals arranged prior to liberalisation.

"Interconnection is a problem but it's more about freeing up existing capacity
taken up by long term contracts than about building new interconnection," said
Gassner at OXERA.

The development of efficient, free markets across Europe would enable
companies to enter into swaps deals, removing the need for physical
interconnection, Gassner added.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 85

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Gentlemen:

	Steve Herber asked this morning that I send to him and Dave Neubauer a copy of the arbitration award in this matter, given that Stan Horton has taken the position that no further business will be done with ONEOK until the measurement issue is straightened out, and that Steve and Dave are in negotiations with ONEOK right now.

	Per my discussion with Steve, I will send to him a three-ring binder headed "CONFIDENTIAL:  Northern v. ONEOK" and that contains the Measurement Agreement, the Operating Agreement (whose dispute resolution language is incorporated into the Measurement Agreement)  and the arbitration award.  Given that I think Kathy R. has that information in Omaha, I would ask that she do the same for Dave Neubauer (Kathy, could you call to confirm that you have the documents and can do this?).

	Please treat the binder as highly confidential, as we arbitrated under a confidentiality agreement.  That goes for any copy of the arbitration award in anyone's possession.

	If you are aware of anyone else who should receive such a binder, please let me know.

	Britt


CONFIDENTIAL  ATTY CLIENT WORK PRODUCT

Sue, Joe, Mary:

As you can see from my other email, I took a wack at supplementing the
EPSA/WPTF comments with some additional stuff on hyrdro.

I will try to get Tim Belden's read on whether my insert is important or not
to include but I would appreciate your feedback too.

Re: EPSA's draft: It is very good.  My only comment is that, beginnign on p.
3,  EPSA should more directly attack the concept of economic witholding.
There really is no such thing (or it really is not different that physical
witholding).  If you raise your price above the opportunity cost in the
market, your buyer will go to that other resource and thus you won't be able
to economically withold.

Re: WPTF, I am not sure what to say.  I apologize that I had not read
carefully before our 1 pm call but the version I reviewed has some issues. I
just don't think it will be received that well by the FERC staff. Other than
amplifying the credit issue (probably in there at Sue's request) I am hard
pressed to know why Enron would support it seperate from EPSA.

Alan Comnes


Clem:  the Bear lawyer is Sharon Chernick

 phone:  212/272-2557
 fax: 212/272-2727
 email: schernick @bear.com

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


fyi

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:57 AM
To: Sanders, Richard B.; Sager, Elizabeth
Cc: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: E-Notes: Risk Considerations for Enron Counterparties: Failure to Exercise Rights May Constitute Waiver

FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:41 AM
To: Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: RE: E-Notes: Risk Considerations for Enron Counterparties: Failure to Exercise Rights May Constitute Waiver

Agreed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Novosel, Sarah
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:12 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: FW: E-Notes: Risk Considerations for Enron Counterparties: Failure to Exercise Rights May Constitute Waiver

Here's one law firm we want to make sure we never use -- it's Baker and McKenzie

-----Original Message-----
From: Zimmer, Michael J
Sent: Wed 10/31/2001 3:21 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: E-Notes: Risk Considerations for Enron Counterparties: Failure to Exercise Rights May Constitute Waiver

>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
> E-Notes provides regular briefings on new developments in global energy
> and public utility law.
>
> October 31, 2001
>
> RISK CONSIDERATIONS FOR ENRON COUNTERPARTIES:
> FAILURE TO EXERCISE RIGHTS MAY CONSTITUTE WAIVER
>
>
>       The reduction by Moody's Investor Service Inc. of Enron Corp.'s
> senior unsecured long-term debt to Baa2 from Baa1 this week may be an
> issue of concern for companies that are counterparts to Enron obligations.
> This downgrade may have immediate consequences under existing transactions
> with Enron given that its current credit rating is now two levels above
> non-investment grade.  Any further downgrade into non-investment grade
> levels could seriously affect relationships between counterparties and
> Enron, and possibly Enron counterparties and their counterparties.
>
>       Enron is the principal in nearly one-quarter of all electricity and
> natural gas trades in the United States.  For Enron's power and gas
> trading counterparties, a credit event such as a downgrade by Moody's may
> precipitate certain obligations under the terms of their trading
> transactions.  For example, any downgrade, not just a downgrade resulting
> in a sub-investment grade rating, may entitle a counterparty to require
> Enron to provide additional credit in support of Enron's purchase
> obligations.  Counterparties should examine all power, gas or other
> commodity purchase and sale documentation to confirm whether they possess
> this right.  The failure to exercise this right may constitute a waiver
> and foreclose access to critical performance and payment assurance,
> threatening to alter the risk assessment and mitigation considerations
> upon which the transactions were originally based.  Furthermore, a failure
> to declare a credit event or default against Enron could cause a default
> on the part of the counterparty itself in collateral or ancillary
> arrangements, such as its financing.  The potential for a domino effect,
> causing defaults or credit events in a series of transactions, is
> considerable.
>
>       It is uncertain whether Enron's efforts to obtain new lines of
> credit will be sufficient to overcome the current difficulties.
> Regardless, it is prudent to review the terms of existing transactions
> with Enron or its affiliates, including any guarantees or other forms of
> corporate credit support.  It is also advisable to examine the terms of
> transactions dependent on, or otherwise ancillary to, transactions with
> Enron or its affiliates to avoid any consequential effects of the Enron
> credit ratings downgrade.
>
>       For further information on how Enron's current financial situation
> could impact your firm's transaction risk profile, please contact Michael
> Zimmer at 202.452.7055 or michael.j.zimmer@bakernet.com, Jonathan W.
> Gottlieb at 202.452.7084 or jonathan.w.gottlieb@bakernet.com or Samir
> Desai at 202.452.7057 or samir.s.desai@bakernet.com .
>
> Michael J. Zimmer
> Jonathan W. Gottlieb
> Samir S. Desai
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> __
> E-Notes is a publication of Baker & McKenzie.  It does not constitute
> legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances.
> The contents are intended as general information only.  You are urged to
> consult your attorney concerning your situation and specific legal
> questions you may have.  For further information on the subjects discussed
> in E-Notes, contact Michael J. Zimmer,
> <mailto:michael.j.zimmer@bakernet.com> or
> Jonathan W. Gottlieb, <mailto:jonathan.w.gottlieb@bakernet.com>.
>
> For more information about BAKER & McKENZIE and our global energy and
> utility practice, click on our electronic business card:
>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
>
> or visit our website at <http://www.bakerinfo.com/Practice
> Areas/nabfmp/energy/!viewme.htm> .
>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:27 PM ---------------------------

"Webmaster@cera.com" <webmaster on 12/08/99 04:37:03 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: CERA Multimedia Presentation: December 8, 1999

**********************************************************************
CERA Multimedia Presentation Replay Now Available!
Wednesday, December 08, 1999
**********************************************************************
Title: The Merger and Acquisition Dilemma
Author: North American Power Team
E-Mail Category: Conference Call, Multimedia
Product Line: North American Electric Power

URL: http://www.cera.com/client/nap/media.cfm

There is a merger and acquisition dilemma facing the power industry today.
The fact that no clear-cut winning strategy has emerged makes the dilemma
more difficult to resolve. In a December 1 CERA North American Power client
conference call and web presentation, Paul Parshley, CERA Director,
discusses:

*  The long term strategy and short term returns of M&A: What does it mean
for multi-service providers, super-regional provides and the global power
and energy companies?

*  The M&A wave continues: Is it better to be near the front of the pack and
embark on an unproven and risky strategic option and hope for the best, or
to wait until strategic options are better understood and run the risk of
missing the best opportunities?

*  Stock prices of recently merged or acquired companies: Is Warren Buffet
right about the power industry?

To view and listen to a replay of this presentation (an example of a new
technology we are using), please click on the link above.

**end**

Follow URL for complete report.
**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://eprofile.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 1999. Cambridge Energy Research Associates

 - att1.htm


has this been input into SAP or do we need to go to Wasaff on this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:23 PM
To:	Rittgers, Dan; Centilli, Carolyn
Cc:	Russo, Gavin; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John; Zahn, Gary; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Transwestern Pipeline Payment Under Protest (Confirmed PAYMENT BY MAIL ONLY   -  $356,736.95)

it was approved today...it won't get paid tomorrow

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rittgers, Dan
Sent:	Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:20 PM
To:	Centilli, Carolyn
Cc:	Russo, Gavin; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John; Zahn, Gary; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Saunders, James; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Transwestern Pipeline Payment Under Protest (Confirmed PAYMENT BY MAIL ONLY   -  $356,736.95)

Due date is tomorrow ASAP.

Please, call me at Ext 35734 or Sandy Rodriquez Ext. 17183 for pick up and mailing.

Below is the Mailing Address for the Subject:

C/O Dee Malonson
Colorado Department of Revenue
Room 522
1375 Sherman ST
Denver CO 80261

Dan Rittgers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:45 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Rittgers, Dan; Russo, Gavin; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John; Zahn, Gary; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb
Subject:	FW: Transwestern Pipeline Payment Under Protest (Confirmed PAYMENT BY MAIL ONLY   -  $356,736.95)

Rod and Tracy,

As a result of a state of Colorado audit TW has been assessed tax (+penalties and interest) for compressor fuel use ($.4mm), and on the purchase of a La Plata facility ($1.3mm). We are protesting. However, it has been recommended, and I concur, that we pay
the compressor fuel use assessment ("under protest") to stop interest accruals on the use tax assessment. We believe the sales tax assessment is at best -weak- and therefore do not recommend any payment.

We're requesting approval to cut a check to the Colorado Dept of Revenue for $356,736.95.
This payment would be a deferred expense until the protest is fully resolved.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rittgers, Dan
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:40 PM
To:	Saunders, James
Cc:	Chandler, Bob; Zahn, Gary; Russo, Gavin
Subject:	Transwestern Pipeline Payment Under Protest (Confirmed PAYMENT BY MAIL ONLY   -  $356,736.95)

Thank you for your time today.  I have confirmed that the payment under protest amount is $356,736.95 calculated as follows:

Transwestern Pipeline - Colorado Sales & Use Tax
Payment Under Protest - Compressor Fuel
For Period September 1996 to July 2001

	Consumer Use	County Sales	Total
Normal Tax	 $      185,626.00 	 $      109,037.00 	 $      294,663.00
Normal Interest	          54,594.76 	          28,181.67 	 $        82,776.43
	 $      240,220.76 	 $      137,218.67 	 $      377,439.43
Less 1/2 discount	         (13,669.15)	           (7,033.33)	         (20,702.48)
Payment Due	 $ 226,551.61 	 $ 130,185.34 	 $ 356,736.95

Confirmed 2/06/2002 with D. Malonson at (303) 866-3083

Check Reference Description should include:

	Colorado Notice Number 0240300178948
	Colorado Account: L 80-30571-000   (Compressor Fuel)

We would like to include check number in our transmittal, when known.

We do not have to pay the $1.2 Million for the purchase of the Compressor Station.

Dan Rittgers
(713) 853-5734


I just received this from PG&E and wanted to make sure others received document also.

Pls distribute as required.

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Crozier, Margie [mailto:Margie.Crozier@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: PG&E Corporation Announcement

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Please give me a call when you get this.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998


I have revised the option form consistent (except where noted) with comments
sent by Herman and Lisa, and have attached a redline version.  Herman, I
dealt with your comment regarding the defn of Optionee by tinkering a little
with the 1st paragraph.  I also construed your comment regarding Enron's
right to terminate the option to NOT preclude termination if our counterparty
is in default.  Please confirm that this is acceptable.

Lisa, I did not change the notice info since the first entity will the the
project co, with ENA Legal receiving a copy.

Please advise if you have any comments.

Kay


Disregard the last email from me.  Attached are the prepared comments that
Steve Kean will have at the FERC meeting tomorrow.

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 06:37 PM -----

	"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
	11/08/2000 06:36 PM

		 To: <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

 - 0133819.01


If you,d like to support friends or family that are affected by Alzheimer,s
disease, put on your walking shoes and join them at Memory Walk 2000 on
October 28.  The walk, sponsored by the Alzheimer,s Association/Houston and
Southeast Texas Chapter, will kick off at 8:00 a.m. at the AMC First Colony
24 Theaters in Sugar Land.  Walk proceeds will be used to support programs
and services for patients, families and caregivers in the Greater Houston
Area.  Proceeds also will be used to fund research for a cure to this tragic
disease.  Don't forget to double the impact we have on theAlzheimer,s
Association by making sure that Enron matches all contributions made by
employees!

If you,d like more information about the walk or would like to make a
donation, contact Diane Bazelides at X55209.


STEVE KEAN

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, October 9
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person ___X____

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
October 6.

Thank you,
Katherine


Deb:  I had a great time seeing you.  Hope you've recovered from the weekend
and that Jennifer got back to school alright and Zachary is ready for another
week.  How's the house?  Maybe you've seen this message before.  Love, Sas
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 08:34 AM -----

	SamChawk@aol.com
	09/28/2000 04:29 PM

		 To: dugjaxon@earthlink.net, eman@direcpc.com, IBorstein@aol.com,
JUDITGB@aol.com, Lacooperaty@mindspring.com, MERLIND12@aol.com,
Gaffen@compuserve.com, egaffe2@hallmark.com, sgaffen@ncninc.com,
Evantrade@aol.com, Paige@penexpress.com, ATTSBG@aol.com, JG922@aol.com,
jdrucker@speercollectibles.com, bkopkin@webpc.dellnet.com, skopkin@usa.net,
Slpressman@aol.com, spressman@imsva.com, lschwart@spsu.edu,
Sara.Shackleton@enron.com, Jim6904@aol.com, DStein009@aol.com,
BOBROC1@aol.com, steres@bwclaw.com, JStrausmd@aol.com, Gusdan@bellsouth.net,
Lisaweinbe@aol.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (no subject)

And so, for all of us, our families & our friends we ask:

    May we get a clean bill of health from our dentist, our psychiatrist, our
ophthalmologist, our cardiologist, our gastroenterologist, our urologist, our
proctologist, our gynecologist, our podiatrist, our plumber and the IRS.

     May our hair, our teeth, our facelift, our abs, our honey cakes, and our
stocks not fall and may our blood pressure, our triglycerides, our
cholesterol,
our white blood count, our weight and our mortgage interest rates not rise.

    May we find a way to travel from anywhere to anywhere in the rush hour in
less than an hour and when we get there, may we find a parking space.

    May we all relax about the third millennium of the common era, and realize
that we still have 239 years until the dawn of the sixth millennium of the
Hebrew calendar by which time the computer will be long since obsolete and so
will we.

    May G-d give us the strength to get through this presidential campaign and
may some of the promises made be kept. May we believe at least half of what
the
candidates propose and may those elected fulfill at least half of what they
promise and may the miracle of reducing taxes and balancing budgets come to
pass.

    May we be awe-struck by G-d's sense of humor as we realize that a
professional wrestler could have become president of the United States and
that
an Orthodox Jew has risen to prominence in American politics while remaining
true to his Jewish roots. It is my belief that G-d's joyous humor is the
reason
he really does not want us to touch our toes while exercising or he would have
put them further up our bodies; and, the reason so many of us take up jogging
is
to hear heavy breathing again.

    May what we see in the mirror delight us and what others see in us,
delight
them.  May someone, as well as G-d, love us enough to forgive our faults, be
blind to our blemishes and tell the world about our virtues.

    May the telemarketers wait until after we finish dinner to call us.

    May our checkbooks and budgets balance and may they include generous
amounts
for charity.

    May we remember to say "I love you" at least once a day to our spouse, our
child, our parent, all of our significant others but not our boss, our intern,
our nurse, our masseur, our hairdresser or our tennis instructor.

    And may the Messiah come this year, and if he does not, may we live as if
he
has, in a world at peace, with awareness of G-d's love in every sunset,
flower,
baby's smile, lover's kiss, and every wonderful astonishing beat of our heart.
May we smile and laugh throughout the year.

L'Shana Tova.    Sam


- MVI_1703.AVI