[IMAGE]

Fantasy Basketball is here...and it's FREE! Join a league or create your own.
It's a slam dunk!
http://fantasybasketball.commissioner.com
Run your Fantasy Basketball league for FREE with our fully-customizable
league management service!
http://basketball.commissioner.com

The tab for SportsLine's FREE Fantasy Football is being picked up by Miller
Lite, our favorite beer around here. Check them out offline at your local bar
or online with us. Grab a Miller Lite. It's Miller Time!

Half Time is the perfect time to visit Half.com. Half.com offers Music,
Books, Movies & Games at HALF the price.

Win The Fantasy Football Trip Of A Lifetime! Love to surf the
cbs.sportsline.com site? You could win a 4-day/3-night weekend in Florida to
attend Cris Carter's FAST Program in Florida! Click here to get started now!

Brought to you by

Sponsorship Bar
You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS
SportsLine Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these
reports please  click here

 Player Updates?NFL Reports?
 Latest NFL Player News

 Charlie Batch , QB DET - The Lie Downs Updated 12/02/00
 Batch should be able to play next weekend against Green Bay, despite leaving
Thursday's game against Minnesota.   "He didn't reinjure his ribs or
anything," team doctor David Collon said. "It was too sore for him to feel he
could play effectively, so we just gave up after the first two series."
Batch received numbing injections to ease pain in his ribs. Collon said no
X-rays were necessary.

 Marcus Robinson , WR CHI - Meximullets Updated 12/02/00
 Robinson was released from Northwestern Memorial Hospital on Saturday, three
days after he was admitted for treatment of back spasms.   Robinson's status
for Sunday night's game against Green Bay at Soldier Field was downgraded
from questionable to doubtful. Marty Booker might start in his place, with
Dez White also seeing increased playing time.

 Jeff Wilkins , K STL - Free Agent Updated 12/02/00
 Wilkins is expected back Sunday from a quadriceps injury that took its time
to heal. Wilkins missed five games and most of a sixth. Coach Mike Martz put
him through rigorous tests Thursday and Friday to make sure he was ready to
go for the game against the Carolina Panthers. Backup Jeff Hall will remain
on the active roster until Sunday.   "I kicked a ton of kickoffs, field
goals, everything on Thursday and today I did more field goals," Wilkins
said. "It felt great. I kicked all-out and there were no twinges, no
tweaks."

 Lamar Smith , RB MIA - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 12/02/00
 Smith will start at RB at Buffalo this week. He may be a risky start,
because hamstring injuries sometimes seem to flare up quickly again.

 Jay Fiedler , QB MIA - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 12/02/00
 Fiedler will start Sunday at Buffalo. He was sidelined by a pinched nerve in
his neck on the first play against the New York Jets on Nov. 19. He returned
to practice Wednesday.   "Jay looked good today, as he has all week, so he'll
start," coach Dave Wannstedt said following Friday's workout.

 Dedric Ward , WR NYJ - Fear Updated 12/01/00
 Ward caught six passes for 93 yards last week against the Bears. His numbers
were likely helped due to the loss of rookie Laveranues Coles to an injury.
Look for Ward to see some passes come his way this week against the Colts, as
Coles will miss his second consecutive game.  Fantasy owners in deeper
leagues may want to consider starting Ward this week.

 Rob Johnson , QB BUF - The Lie Downs Updated 12/01/00
 Johnson is listed as probable on the injury report with sore ribs, but he
will still start this week's game against the Dolphins. He was knocked out of
last week's game at Tampa Bay, but threw for 262 yards and two touchdowns
before exiting. Don't expect big numbers from Johnson this week against
Miami, whose defense ranks seventh in the league against the pass.

 Randall Cunningham , QB DAL - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Cunningham did not practice on Thursday because of a groin strain. His
status for Sunday's game against the Buccaneers is uncertain.  The Cowboys
plan to use third string quarterback Anthony Wright to back up Troy Aikman if
Cunningham isn't ready to play. At this point in the season, no Dallas
quarterbacks should be considered for your starting lineup.

 Panthers , DT CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Not that the Panthers have been a stellar defense for Fantasy owners this
season, but this week may be a bad time to start Carolina.  The Panthers will
face a Rams offense that will be pumped up and edgy with the return of QB
Kurt Warner.  Carolina may get a few interceptions off a rusty Warner but
look for them to struggle to score Fantasy points against the Rams.  It would
be wise to use another defense for this week.

 Martin Gramatica , K TB - The Lie Downs Updated 12/01/00
 Look for Gramatica to pile up Fantasy points this week as the Bucs score at
will against the Cowboys.  He is currently seventh in the NFL in scoring.
Barring injury, he should be one of the top picks among Fantasy kickers next
year.

 Buccaneers , DT TB - The Lie Downs Updated 12/01/00
 Look for the Buccaneers to treat QB Troy Aikman like a tackling dummy this
Sunday.  The Cowboys have failed to protect him against adequate pass rushes
this season so don't expect them to do any better against the T.B. sack
machine.  The Buccaneers will be in Aikman's face all day and will force him
into some turnovers as well.  Fantasy owners that possess the Bucs' defense
will see them help their team in a major way this week.

 Ryan Longwell , K GB - Ramiro Updated 12/01/00
 Look for Longwell to have a big week against the Bears Sunday.  The Packers
should have no problems gaining yards against the Bears but they may have
trouble getting into the end zone, giving Longwell some kicking
opportunities.  He has been successful when given the opportunity connecting
on 24-of-28 FGs this season.  Look for him to score some points this week and
be helpful, as far as Fantasy kickers go.

 Lions , DT DET - FDIC Updated 12/01/00
 The Lions' thinned secondary took another hit on Thursday as the team lost
cornerback Bryant Westbrook for the remainder of the season to a torn left
Achilles tendon. His loss will force Detroit to move nickel back Marquis
Walker into the starting lineup.  The pass defense should be alright for the
rest of the season though.  The pass rush has come alive recently forcing the
QBs to rush their throws.  Detroit also has a favorable schedule with games
against the Packers, Jets, and Bears.  Teams whose pass offense has struggle
considerably this season.

 Robert Holcombe , RB STL - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Holcombe will start at fullback Sunday, but he will also get some carries at
HB.  At this point in the Fantasy season he will be a good reserve back to
have.  Just in case the Rams decide to rest Marshall Faulk in the upcoming
weeks.

 Jeff Wilkins , K STL - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 So far so good for Wilkins and the Rams.  The kicker went through an intense
kicking workout Thursday without experiencing any pain in his leg.  If he
continues to kick without experiencing the slightest twinge he will play
Sunday at Carolina.  Wilkins could be extremely helpful to Fantasy Owners in
the last few weeks.  The Rams will get QB Kurt Warner back Sunday and face
the Panthers and Vikings in their next two games.  Look for the offense to
explode once again and give Wilkins a lot of opportunities to score points.

 Jerald Moore , RB NO - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/01/00
 Moore's condition has improved and he has been upgraded to probable for
Sunday's game against the Broncos.  Moore suffered a stinger against the Rams
last Sunday and his neck and shoulder have been sore all week.  Give Moore a
start this Sunday.  He has been an adequate replacement for RB Ricky Williams
and has been a nice fit behind the Saints' offensive line.

 Jake Reed , WR NO - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Reed will practice Friday for the first time since breaking his leg.  He put
up dismal Fantasy numbers before he injured his leg.  He could be back in
action before the regular season ends but don't count on him helping out your
Fantasy team.

 Aaron Stecker , RB TB - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Stecker the Bucs' primary kickoff returner sat out of practice Thursday and
is not expected to play Sunday.  Tampa has activated WR Frank Murphy from its
practice squad with intentions of having him handle the kicks.  If returners
are valuable in your Fantasy league it would be wise for you to pick up a
healthy return man.

 Macey Brooks , WR CHI - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Brooks missed practice Thursday due to a lower back strain and is
questionable for Sunday's game against the Packers.  If Brooks doesn't play
the Bears will only have four healthy receivers.  This could mean a healthy
diet of running plays.  It would be wise for Fantasy owners to utilize
Chicago RBs James Allen and Marlon Barnes considering the health of the Bears
receivers and Green Bay's recent struggles with its run defense.

 Marcus Robinson , WR CHI - Meximullets Updated 12/01/00
 Robinson was hospitalized for back spasms Wednesday night and still remained
in the hospital Thursday night.  He is also suffering from a lower back
sprain and is not expected to play against the Packers Sunday.  Marty Booker
and rookie Dez White will alternate in Robinson's spot.  Eddie Kennison will
probably be used as the primary receiver.  It would be wise to stay away from
Robinson and the rest of the Chicago passing team this week.

 James Stewart , RB DET - The Lie Downs Updated 12/01/00
 Stewart had a mediocre Fantasy game Thursday carrying 15 times for 67 yards
and a touchdown.  Look for Stewart to have a better game against the Packers
next week.  The Packers defensive line is thin without DT Santana Dotson.
They allowed Carolina rookie Brad Hoover to romp through their front for 117
yards Monday.

 Stoney Case , QB DET - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 Case entered Thursday night's game for Detroit, replacing starter Charlie
Batch who left after re-aggravating a rib injury. Playing for the injured
Batch, Case completed 23-of-33 passes for 230 yards with one touchdown and
one interception, and also ran six times for 62 yards. Case might not be a
bad acquisition at this point of the season. If Batch can't play next week it
would be best to plug in his backup. Batch may be the better winner, but
Case's running ability makes him the better Fantasy QB.

 Larry Foster , WR DET - Free Agent Updated 12/01/00
 The rookie wideout put up the best numbers in a game laced with talented
receivers.  He caught eight passes for 106 yards and a late touchdown.  Don't
rush out and try to acquire Foster though.  His numbers were probably more a
product of his chemistry with fellow second-stringer, QB Stoney Case, who
filled in for the injured Charlie Batch.  Foster seemed to be Case's first
throwing option.  When Batch returns Foster will probably be the third option
again.

 Daunte Culpepper , QB MIN - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/01/00
 Culpepper had a boring Fantasy performance against the Lions Thursday.  He
threw a touchdown and two interceptions while completing 19-of-32 passes for
160 yards.  Expect bigger and better numbers for Culpepper when he faces the
Rams next week in what will probably the biggest offensive explosion of the
season.

 Cris Carter , WR MIN - Fear Updated 12/01/00
 Carter caught seven passes for 45 yards Thursday, including a four-yard
second quarter touchdown for his 1,000th career  catch.  It was a milestone
night for Carter but a forgettable one for Fantasy owners.  His numbers
weren't too spectacular.  Look for him to put up better numbers against the
Rams and their generous defense next week.

 Randy Moss , WR MIN - Mean Machine Updated 12/01/00
 The Lions managed to put the clamps on the star wideout Thursday.  He was
held to 26 yards on three catches.  Don't worry Fantasy owners.  If your team
is still in the playoff hunt Moss will make up for his performance next week
against the Rams.  He is just too talented to be shut down in consecutive
games.

 Robert Smith , RB MIN - Mean Machine Updated 12/01/00
 Smith ran for two touchdowns and 117 yards on 17 carries Thursday night,
including a 43-yard fourth-quarter TD run that sealed the game for
Minnesota.  If you have Smith on your Fantasy team he may very well seal a
Fantasy championship for your team.  He is without a doubt the hottest
Fantasy back right now.

 Steve McNair , QB TEN - FDIC Updated 11/30/00
 Although McNair is listed as questionable on the Titans' injury report for
Sunday's game in Philadelphia, he is expected to get the start. His thumb is
still sore and he's been icing it regularly, but it's not expected to keep
him from playing. Still, the Eagles have a solid defense and the Titans'
passing game has struggled of late, so you might want to consider starting
someone else this week.

 Eddie George , RB TEN - Fear Updated 11/30/00
 George did not practice yesterday in order to rest his injured right big
toe, although he and Coach Jeff Fisher said he could have participated.
Fisher wants George to be able to fully participate in today's session, and
expects he will be able to. Considering George has held up this well through
a variety of injuries in recent weeks, there's little reason to expect he
won't start Sunday in his return to Philadelphia and post solid Fantasy
numbers.

 Hines Ward , WR PIT - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 11/30/00
 Ward is listed as probable on the Steelers' injury report for Sunday's game
against Oakland. With Pittsburgh's receivers hurting, expect him to play and
be the focus of the passing game. He's still marginal as a Fantasy producer,
though.

More Updates

 Breakdown?Schedule?

  Thrill Kill Cult

  Player
  Pos
  Points
  Brooks, Aaron
 QB
 0.0
  Anderson, Mike
 RB
 0.0
  Smith, Lamar
 RB
 0.0
  Dawkins, Sean
 WR
 0.0
  Glenn, Terry
 WR
 0.0
  Ward, Hines
 WR
 0.0
  Dilger, Ken
 TE
 0.0
  Hanson, Jason
 K
 5.0
  Saints
 DT
 0.0

 [IMAGE]
  TOTAL
 ?
  5.0

 [IMAGE]
 Jackson, Darrell
 WR
 0.0
  Dolphins
 DT
 0.0
  Brunell, Mark
 QB
 0.0
  Davis, Terrell
 RB
 0.0
  Fiedler, Jay
 QB
 0.0
  Hoover, Brad
 RB
 0.0
  Rice, Jerry
 WR
 0.0
  Sanders, Chris
 WR
 0.0

[IMAGE]
  at Meximullets

  Player
  Pos
  Points
  Garcia, Jeff
 QB
 0.0
  Davis, Stephen
 RB
 0.0
  Garner, Charlie
 RB
 0.0
  Freeman, Antonio
 WR
 0.0
  Holt, Torry
 WR
 0.0
  Toomer, Amani
 WR
 0.0
  Brady, Kyle
 TE
 0.0
  Anderson, Gary
 K
 6.0
  Redskins
 DT
 0.0

 [IMAGE]
  TOTAL
 ?
  6.0

 [IMAGE]
 Hicks, Skip
 RB
 0.0
  Bryson, Shawn
 RB
 0.0
  Autry, Darnell
 RB
 0.0
  McNabb, Donovan
 QB
 0.0
  Ravens
 DT
 0.0
  Robinson, Marcus
 WR
 0.0
  Schroeder, Bill
 WR
 0.0
  Watson, Justin
 RB
 0.0

Copyright 2000 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site is always at http://football.commissioner.com/kourn

FB10SP


Wes' memo finally went out to Sherriff.  DPR won't change at this point in
time.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 11:50 AM
---------------------------
From: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 08:10 AM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

There has been a fair amount of discussion about this as well as the
reporting of drift for the North America businesses.  Both Mike McConnell and
Jeff Shankman are opposed to moving the location of drift in the DPR.  I know
that North America included US drift in its plan and includes "drift
earnings" in its margin.  I believe you do the same in Europe.  Jeff is
adamant that we not  move US drift from EGM's section of the DPR and has
asked for UK drift to remain, as well.  You may want to call Jeff.  Sally and
I will do what ever you guys decide.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jeffrey A Shankman
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Wes Colwell
Cc: Sally Beck
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

Please deal with this.  Wes, you know what I think and what we've decided
on.  Jeff
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hickerson, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

FYI

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
07:21 AM ---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
02/27/2001 06:07 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Gary

I prepare the London Summary and I have been requested by John Sherriff here
in London to have changes made to the reporting format of the Executive
Viewer report.  John's request and the changes he has asked for are detailed
below.  In essence, John would like Enron Europe's 'UK Drift' revenue to be
reported under the 'Enron Europe' heading in the Exec Viewer instead of being
reported under the 'Global Markets' heading.  If you agree to this change
could you advise Chris Abel and Johnny Thibodeux to make the appropriate
changes.  If, however,  you would like to discuss the matter further please
contact John Sherriff.

Regards

Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Kass/EU/Enron on 27/02/2001 23:50
---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
23/02/2001 16:27
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Kass/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

Michael - Please move forward with these changes.

John

James New
23/02/2001 16:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

The attached is the format I believe we discussed and agreed with Ted a few
days ago. In order that the guys in Houston will make the changes they
require your authorisation.

If you can authorise by return then Michael Kass and I will forward it on to
the necessary people below.

If you are not happy with the attached please let me know what needs to be
changed.

Thanks James
---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 23/02/2001 16:14
---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
22/02/2001 10:47
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Changes are required to the reporting format of Enron Europe's P/L in the
Executive Viewer .  Below is a list of these changes as well as the person
responsible for effecting each change:

Gary Hickerson: The UK Drift book is to be reclassified from the 'Enron
Global Markets' heading to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Susie Ayala: The Enron Europe (Net Fair Value) Equity Investments book is to
reclassified from 'Merchant Summary' to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Chris Abel: The following changes are to be made to the books reported under
the 'Enron Europe' heading:
 - J Block is to be reported as a separate line item;
 - Structured Derivatives UK is to include all other structured derivatives
and power/gas accruals (currently reported under 'Other' line item);
 - For each of the Electricty books, could you change the word Electricity to
Power in the headings (for consistency purposes).


MRT considers both of these contracts to be Maximum Rate FTS agreements.  All current shippers on MRT receive a prorata share of the Settlement Discount.  The pipeline completed that rate case settlement in November 2001.  MRT cannot file another rate case for at least three years and is not obligated to file a rate case by a stipulated date.  Therefore, for the remaining term of these agreements the Settlement Discount will be in place.

For K# 434:
	Monthly Reservation w/ Settlement Discount is $15,811.58
	Estimated Reservation Charges To Be Paid through End of Term is $411,100
		( 26 months from Apr 02 through May 04 )
For K# 416:
	Monthly Reservation w/ Settlement Discount is $2,238.48
	Estimated Reservation Charges To Be Paid through End of Term is $69,400
		( 26 months from Apr 02 through Oct 04 )

I also received the letter you requested that documents the particulars of EEM picking up the contract from PG&E Energy Services.

Thanks for your help,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Proctor, Shemin V. [mailto:sproctor@akllp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Subject: MRT rate info

Hi Ruth,
I don't want to harass you, but if you have the MRT demand charge info,
monthly and for the primary term, I would like to have it. I called
Steve Mahon and he apparently wants to speak with me and Mark today. If
possible, I want to keep MRT in play as part of the discussion and have
all th necessary info.

Also, let me know whether it would create any problems for you if I work
from DC tomorrow and Friday?
Shemin


I think Ben's time frame is realistic. I assume we will enter into an
assignment and assumption agreement with Sithe, to which GE will consent. In
addition, we may need an override letter to the turbine contract to address
the E-Next/accounting issues. GE is familiar with what we need in for E-Next,
which should help expedite matters.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 07:55 PM
To: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David
Duran/ENRON@enronXgate, Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, Roseann
Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Bills/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I've been told that we need to resubmit a non-binding expression of interest
by Tuesday. Previously, we submitted a one page non-binding letter indicating
that the FMV of the units is $44 MM each. You raise a good point in that we
should be prepared to say (again, on a non-binding basis) how long we will
need to close (in addition to increasing the bid on the units). I think if
our number is good, 30 - 45 days for documentation and close would work, but
I think we should also be willing to post some non-refundable $s within say,
2 weeks on the basis of an exclusivity agreement with Sithe.

The group's thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Deffner, Joseph
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:56 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mann, Kay; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf,
Roseann; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

What is expected for the Tuesday bid? I would guess the most critical from a
timing perspective will be a response centered on price and
commercial/technical issues. Michael indicates below he would like a
timetable for internal approvals to a closing. Do we have any indication how
pressed he is to close and fund versus agreeing on economic terms quickly and
allowing us to review the form of contract to ensure compliance with
accounting and finance guidlelines along the lines of our discussion earlier
this week? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann
Cc: Booth, Chris; Rose, Steven; Virgo, Robert; Duran, W. David
Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


Per our discussion.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 02:13
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           11/16/2000 06:01 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

E voila!

Kay Mann@ENRON
11/16/2000 02:47 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

Ben,

Has the payment allocation chart been updated, and if so, could I get a copy?

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/16/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Justin,

Mark Taylor asked that I take a quick look at the above-referenced
agreement.  Here are my comments:

1.  Recital B -  We should delete "Internet access and".

2. Definition of Agreement - I am not aware of the term "annexures" - I
assume it is the equivalent of "annexes".

3. Section 2.4.1  Should we specify the size and location of the Enron
Link?   and the Sports.com link?

4. Section 4.2  "Enron" should be deleted before the phrase  "in the event".

5. Section 8.1 The word "form" should be changed to "from".

6. Section 8.2.2 The phrase "will be made available" should be deleted.

7.  I do not know the creditworthiness of Sports.com, but should we require
that they maintain general liability insurance to back up the indemnities
which they are providing us.

8. Section 21 Should we include transfers to Affiliates as transfers
permissible without consent of the other party.

Should you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to call me
at 713-853-9720.

Thanks,

Jason


Jeff & Carol:

As you work through these issues, please remember that even though the Mexico
commercial group may not plan to offer many of their own products and may not
expect many other products to appeal to their customers, the EnronOnline
people will expect all products listed online to be available unless we can
articulate a compelling reason to restrict them.

Mark

	Jeff Blumenthal
	06/20/2000 11:53 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mario Parra
Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Online Issues - Mexico

Carol,

I've been working with Jaime Williams and our outside tax advisors to
determine the Mexican tax consequences applicable to those products that
Jaime has informed me will be offered to Mexican counterparties through
EnronOnLine and, potentially, a separate ENA Mexican entity.  I should be
able to provide the results by Friday or Monday.  Please contact me at ext.
35777 if you'd like to discuss in the meantime.

Best regards,

Jeff

   Carol St Clair                06/20/2000 11:15 AM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Issues - Mexico

Jeff:
As I think you are aware, the Meixco and online group want to implement
online trading for Mexican counterparties.  Are there any tax issues taht we
should be aware of?  If we conduct online trades using ENA and telephone
trades with an Enron Mexican entity, will the exercise of setoff rights
create any tax issues?   My understanding is that the Enron counterparty will
be ENA.
Carol


FYI

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 08/24/2000 08:58 AM -----

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Hemstock @ ECT                           08/23/2000 11:13 PM

To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, rmilnthorp@home.com
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: PPA News Conference Speaking Notes

Please see attached the final version of your speaking notes.

Please Note: the last page of the notes deal with Project Stanley so I have
marked them "confidential" and it is important that you not inadvertently
share the last page with anyone


I will be out of the office until Monday, January 7,2002.


Per the letter from Enron Net Works LLC, this email is to inform you that I have received my Enron WorldCom calling card.  Should you have any questions, please call me at 37276.


How is your wounded eye?


Jeff,

 Let's just close on March 1.

Phillip


Christine,

We shall arrange a phone interview with you.

Vince


Greetings folks.  We should decide how we want to handle.  One thing I'm not
clear on and that I couldn't find in the syllabus is, what's the format for
the write up?  If we're called on to discuss, do we simply discuss orally,
some sort of simplistic PP slides, spreadsheets, other?  Anyway to discuss
between now and Monday, or do we want to just take Dylan up on his offer?

Best,
Jeff

Kimberly Kupiecki <kkupiecki@arpartners.com> on 09/07/2000 06:56:44 PM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc: dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu, kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu,
jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: E220 Case #1

Hello all,

I will take a look at the case tonight.

Divvying is fine with me.

At 03:22 PM 9/7/00, jdasovic@enron.com wrote:

>would seem useful if we all contribute in some manner, but i'm open to
>suggestions.  perhaps we could divvy up the questions.
>
>
>
>
>Dylan Windham <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu> on 09/07/2000 04:50:31 PM
>
>To:   dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu, kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu,
>       jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
>cc:
>Subject:  E220 Case #1
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I have started to look at the case assignment for Monday.  Since, I will be
>out of town the following week I will volunteer to write this one up.  I
>don't know how he want to divvy up the work (by Questions or everyone does
>it all), but let me know.  I have already made a spreadsheet with the
>combined cash flow statement that I will send to you tomorrow.  Let me know
>how we want to handle this.
>
>--Dylan
>
>
>Ofc. Dylan H. Windham
>Threat Management/Domestic Violence Unit
>University of California Police - Berkeley
>Room 1 Sproul Hall
>Berkeley, CA 94720
>(510) 642-1606

Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
kkupiecki@arpartners.com
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
02:37 PM ---------------------------

"Julie Haviland" <julie.haviland@PaineWebber.COM> on 04/28/2000 12:57:40 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Some municipal bonds for you to look at.....

I called out muni desk to have them take a look at the current munis avaiable
that looked best at this time to invest $50,000 going out to 30 years for
you.  The following is what they came up with....

Pecos Co TX Cert of Obl w/a Coupon 5.5% Matures in 02/01/11 callable at par
on 02/01/07 offered at $101.964 - AAA rated

Brownsville Util Rev w/a coupon of 5.25% maturing in 09/01/15 callable at par
on 09/01/05 offered at $97.425 - AAA rated

Alvin TX ISD PSF w/a coupon of 5.75% maturing in 08/15/22 callable at par on
08/15/10 offered at par - AAA rated

Houston TX Air Revs w/a coupon of 5.00% maturing in 07/01/28 callable at par
on 07/01/08 offered at 86.479 - AAA rated

Remember, these are subject to change, but if these interest you and they are
not still available, I will see if there is something comparable.

Talk to you soon.  Please call me with any questions.  Thanks, Julie


Hi Liz -

I had a very interesting conversation with Rocky.  He is still in business,
just finishing up boots for the new President.    Also, I have been called
"Precious" and "Baby" this morning.  Somehow, it just seems appropriate from
him!!

He is located at RJ's Boot Company and Shoe Shop
3321 Ella Blvd. & 34th Street
Houston, Texas  77018

Phone:  713-682-1650, fax 713-682-5520

Rosie


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS

Jeff, we wanted to make sure you were aware that the CPUC approved an
alternate decision from Loretta Lynch today that limits the ability of
Edison (CLEC light) to use leased facilities from other providers as an
alternative to getting CEQA approval and building its own facilities.
Upon initial review, it doesn't appear that the ruling would preclude
the arrangement we discussed, in which Enron would purchase SERVICE
(which could be dark fiber) from a carrier with CEQA authority even
though provision of the service would require building new facilities.
I'd like to wait until I see the final version of the decision before
giving you a more definite interpretation, but I wanted to make sure you
were aware of this development until then.  Please call if you have any
immediate questions.


Hi Warren,

Please print all of these documents, and place in individual file folders
with the name of the document.  I will need 6 copies of each of the signature
pages for each of the documents.  If it is easier you can just make 6 copies
of each document.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2001 03:34
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/24/2001 03:18:38 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Delta Documents

 <<Escrow Agreement Enron Salmon LLC.DOC>>  <<ENA.Ltr.Forms.DOC>>
<<Entitlement.Ltr.DOC>>  <<ENA.Consent.DOC>>  <<Salmon - Resolutions of
LLC.DOC>>  <<LLC Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC>>  <<Consent of Salmon
LLC electing officers.DOC>>

Kay:

We have attached execution copies of the following documents for execution
by ENA and/or Salmon LLC:

1.  Escrow Agreement (we will change pages to delete brackets on ENA wire
instructions and to add Pegasus wire instructions as soon as we get info
from Pegasus);
2.  ENA Letter re Forms of Agreement;
3.  Entitlement Letter Agreement;
4.  ENA Consent and Agreement;
5.  Consent of Sole Member authorizing the turbine acquisition and the
issuance of membership interests;
6.  First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (we will
fill in the dates later); and
7.  Consent of Members of LLC electing new directors, and Consent of
Directors of LLC electing new officers (we will type in names once they are
provided by Pegasus).

You should have the following documents:

1.  Schedule of Fees for Escrow Agreement; and
2.  Certificate of Incumbency;
3.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement;
4.  Bill of Sale; and
5.  Notice of Intent to Purchase Specified Option Property.

The following agreements are not yet available for signature by ENA:

1.  Escrow Disbursement Instructions (Greg says he thinks the one we
originally submitted was okay, but he wants to review again - he had put it
on hold due to the securities entitlement account issue)
2.  LLC Membership Certificates (need membership certificate books)
3.  Secretary's Certificate of LLC (waiting on revised draft from Paul
Hastings - they have promised to re-send it shortly.  If I don't get this in
an hour or so, I'll have my secretary re-type it and will forward to you.
Unfortunately, this one is the other incumbency certificate which requires a
number of signatures).

I have convinced Greg Lang that since the GE Consent and Agreement refers to
the fact that Salmon LLC has granted a security interest in the Turbine
Contract to the lenders, the GE Consent and Agreement should be executed by
Salmon after Pegasus is in control of Salmon.   Therefore, I have not
enclosed the GE Consent and Agreement in this package.

Please send over a signed copy of the Confidentiality Agreement for our
records.  If you have any questions or comments, please advise.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Escrow Agreement Enron Salmon LLC.DOC
 - ENA.Ltr.Forms.DOC
 - Entitlement.Ltr.DOC
 - ENA.Consent.DOC
 - Salmon - Resolutions of LLC.DOC
 - LLC Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC
 - Consent of Salmon LLC electing officers.DOC


That sounds great but I will not be the attorney handling this.  My ISDA days
are soon coming to an end!

	Tana Jones
	06/14/2000 05:50 PM

		 To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership

I had a conversation with Ed Staub over at Duke today, and he now wants to
get an agreement in place between Duke and ENA.  I mentioned to him our
agreement between ENA and ECC that would allow us to trade both entities
under the same master, and he was not interested in trading in that manner,
he wants separate agreements in place with both companies, obviously,
mirroring the terms of the master we are putting in place with ECC, just
changing it for any cross-border issues.  I told him I would run it by our
Credit Dept.


Shirley,

My Power Point presentations for Peoples'
presentation,

I need color transparencies.
I don't know how many B&W copies we need.
You can ask  Lynn Pitofsky about the number
of participants.

Vince


Well, what a coincidence!!!
?
I just re-submitted my resume!!? Keep your fingers  crossed.?
?
?


Sandi,

Sorry for just now getting back with you.  I was out last week.

The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated
on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant.  The fee will
be adjusted yearly based on CPI.

Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the
delivered volumes (actuals or nominations).  I think we should use actuals
due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a
daily basis.  We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to
purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at
the 45,000 base.  I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they
are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less.  Do
you agree with this?

D

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rate for  Tenaska Deal

Daren,
When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you
guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me
how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater
of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual
deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year?
based on what index?

Thanks,
Sandi


Shelley--looks good to me.  DF

Shelley Corman
10/19/2000 10:53 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Comments in Technical Conference Proceeding

Yesterday at the regulatory roundtable it was decided that we should file
some brief comments in the FERC Sept. 19 technical conference proceeding
(PL00-1).  These comments are due today & I need to get them to the
Washington office by noon.

Let me know if you have a chance to read it & have any comments.  Sorry for
the short notice.


is that you in this picture?

k

 - aqua2.jpg


Joe,

I have written to Pal Quilkey to invite Christian Werner to Houston
for a week to discuss how much of his research we can use.

Vince

Joseph Hrgovcic
08/01/2000 06:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince,

 I have inquired into Christian's climate models. It seems to me like a long
term project. Chiristian says that his model might be able to do better than
the Australian Met given that they ignore some of the variables he uses and
that they are an "old boy's network"  resistant to new developments, but I
don't think the same can be said of most other weather services. As far as
the NWS goes, they run their model on a Cray, they have several very talented
PhD's working on it full-time,  and even then, they can only get a dozen or
so runs per night. In other words, it's a huge system. Replicating something
even close to that will not be an easy task.

 That being said, I think there are related applications that we could look
into.  Since I've already promised the RAC group and the weather desk's PJM
traders to put together a Vector AutoRegressive model of daily temperatures,
I think it makes sense to see if something better than a VAR model can be put
together, perhaps a very stripped down version of the kind of model Christian
has. What I have in mind is something  that would give us say, up to several
dozens of "possible" temperature forecasts every morning, which would be
calculated using actual climate models (as opposed to time series models). I
would not use this as a forecasting tool (the NWS model results would make a
far better  "best guess"), but our ensemble could still be used to provide a
distribution of temperature scenarios. This ensemble would have several uses:

 1) we could price the book for the ensemble of runs and thereby obtain a
more realistic daily V@R for the Weather Book (and eventually interface that
with the power desk's V@R calculations)

 2) we could use the ensemble of forecasts to relate temperature forecasts to
week-ahead CDD and HDD distributions (for use in our demand swaps)

 3)  if Freese-Notis were to give us one of their qualitative forecasts,
e.g., "expect the trough to recede" we could sort through the different Monte
Carlo scenarions, find one in which the trough in question is receding, and
use corresponding output statistics to download the actual temperatures
corresponding to that scenario. Up till now, we haven't found a good way of
getting a numerical fix on what different forecasts actually mean
temperature-wise

 4) we could use the associated visualization routines that come with such
models to get animations of the evolution of historical weather patterns. The
traders could use these in order to look for historical periods which roughly
match current weather conditions and get an idea of what could happen;
although these meteorological models would not be good for simulating
month-ahead or season-ahead weather (trust me on this) we could still use the
visualization technology to do to analogous seasonal animations.

 Just today, I've spoken with Dr. Jacobsen of Stanford University, who has
written one of the more recent textbooks on climate forecasting , and who
worked with UCLA's general circulation model.  He says that getting a
simplified version of MM5 (which is itself a simplified, limited-area version
of the GCM models that NWS, COLA, and UCLA use) would take several months to
implement,  assuming the people involved are already well versed in the
technology. Also, I have contacted AER, a Massachusetts- based weather
consulting firm, and they tell me that they have a MM5 model running daily
(only one run per night), and also some smaller PC models up and running.
They are of course willing to work with us for a fee. Their MM5 version runs
on a $200,000 parallel processor.

 I am open to your suggestions (or objections as the case may be). I'm not
sure how the costs would be apportioned given that this would benefit all of
Enron, and not just the weather desk.

 I am scheduled to go to Boston next week anyway, and would like to use the
opportunity to visit with AER. I will of course coordinate any projects with
Christian (if we get something like this up and running it will be more
likely that he can get the computing power he needs to run his own Australian
model).

Joe


The attached is a pretty decent summary of the recent U.S. Supreme Court's
opinion on the Clean Water Act's juridictional reach to isolated waters.
Thought it might be of interest to origination/developer type lawyers.

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001 09:02 AM -----

	"Jack Mingus" <JBM@vnf.com>
	01/17/2001 08:03 AM

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Analysis of the Supreme Court's January 9, 2001 SWANCC Decision

Attached is a brief memo prepared by Van Ness Feldman analyzing the U.S.
Supreme Court's January 9, 2001 decision in the case of Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (No. 99-1178 (U.S.
January 9, 2001)).  By a vote of 5 to 4, the Court determined that "isolated"
waters (often wetlands) are not subject to regulation under the Clean Water
Act (and the Section 404 permitting program).  This decision has significant
implications for anyone who is, or will be engaging in the construction of
generating facilities, transmission lines, factories, houses, pipelines, or
similar projects.

Van Ness Feldman will be providing our friends and clients with periodic
updates on breaking legal and legislative activity throughout the remainder
of 2001.  If you would like to be removed from this distribution list, please
respond to this e-mail and let us know.

 - SWANCC.doc
 - SWANCC.wpd


Chris  It was great seeing you at lunch lets keep in touch

Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000
03:19 PM ---------------------------

Scott Goodell
10/27/2000 04:28 PM
To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjeev Khanna/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Atlanta Storages as of 10/31 (Projected)

   MSQ  NPC Balance  ENA Balance
Sonat CSS  832,737  832737   -1
Transco WSS  373,372  373,373   0
Transco ESS  24,697  17613   1210
Tennessee  Capacity went to zero for 11/1 flow


Donna,
Here is a preliminary November purchase with estimated volumes.  Crestone should have final measurement next week.  I don't expect the numbers to change much, if any.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Theresa
(303) 575-6485


---------------------- Forwarded by Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

Matthew Lenhart
04/07/2000 01:45 PM
To: Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Joys of Marriage

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com> on 04/07/2000 09:54:13 AM
To: jjohnson@daewoous.com, kmcgallion@king-ranch.com,
Terri@EDIarchitecture.com, waldron50@yahoo.com, Sablica@compuserve.com,
scody@acplasticsinc.com, sclarkson@tractebelpowerinc.com,
Chad.Landry@enron.com, Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com, matthew.overbeck@ac.com,
JohnWheeler@PZLQS.com, hallieklassen@usa.net, j.cruthis@mail.utexas.edu,
AChang01@coair.com, Liz.Mortenson@chron.com, Allison Damon
<adamon@dttus.com>, Michael Lednicky <mlednicky@dttus.com>, Todd Rimmer
<trimmer@dttus.com>, Chris Strain <cstrain@dttus.com>
cc:

Subject: The Joys of Marriage

> I've got game....'Ole!
>
>
>
> Subject:      FW: The Joys of Marriage
>
>  <<cuddles>>
>

 - FARTINGI.AVI
 - RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------------- Forwarded
----------------------------------
From: mwilkerson@ajilon.com at Internet-USA
Date: 4/7/00 8:50AM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: AMorse@EMJMETALS.COM at Internet-USA
*To: hymela@netsolve.net at Internet-USA
*To: bretts@mail.utexas.edu at Internet-USA
*To: brian.sorensen@chase.com at Internet-USA
*To: vmw@ispchannel.com at Internet-USA
*To: Elrhea.stockton@dcicorp.com at Internet-USA
*To: jdryer@kpmg.com at Internet-USA
*To: jwaldman@ers.state.tx.us at Internet-USA
*To: jim_stiffler@dell.com at Internet-USA
*To: keith.hatley@allegiancetelecom.com at Internet-USA
*To: sablica@compuserve.com at Internet-USA
*To: mark_hooper@dell.com at Internet-USA
*To: Michael_Ecklund@hines.com at Internet-USA
*To: r8834c@email.sps.mot.com at Internet-USA
*To: dmehta@uth.tmc.edu at Internet-USA
*To: mdeshotels@rightnowtech.com at Internet-USA
*To: pavri@bplaw.com at Internet-USA
*To: pconnor@us.ibm.com at Internet-USA
*To: RMoser@EMJMETALS.COM at Internet-USA
*To: ryane@tocquigny.com at Internet-USA
*To: Schoelpple@yahoo.com at Internet-USA
*To: swlh@excite.com at Internet-USA
*To: hookem@ev1.net at Internet-USA
*To: wwindom@aol.com at Internet-USA
*To: waldron50@yahoo.com at Internet-USA
Subject: The Joys of Marriage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-


Hi Boys,
?
I REALLY need your lists asap.? Will you  oblige soon?? LU-M


Hi Sara, I am following up to see if you were able to get back to her?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara_Alexander@cargill.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Mara+5FAlexander+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	Nelson, Cheryl
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International, S.A.

Cheryl/Sara,
I hope that after recent events we find you and yours all well.

We are still looking for information as to how we should proceed
in initiating an ISDA Master Agreement between Enron Capital &
Trade Resources International Corp. Cargill International, S.A.
("CISA").  Could someone kindly advise?

Thanks,
Regards,
Mara Alexander
Sr. Documentation Analyst
Cargill, Incorporated
Tel: 952.984.3417
Fax: 952.984.3872
e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [mailto:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:54 PM
To: IMCEANOTES-Mara+5FAlexander+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
Cc: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International, S.A.

Sara, I am out on vacation so can you advise Mara on how to proceed?
Thanx.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Mara_Alexander@cargill.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Mara+5FAlexander+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Monday, August 27, 2001 8:06 AM
   To:     Nelson, Cheryl
   Subject:  RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
S.A.

   Cheryl, I have no contact in London.  Can you tell me to whom I
should
   be speaking?

   Thanks,
   Mara

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [mailto:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:44 PM
   To: IMCEANOTES-Mara+5FAlexander+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
   Subject: RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
S.A.

   Mara, my notes indicate otherwise -- that you had decided to talk to
a
   contact in London.  If that is no the case, let me.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Mara_Alexander@cargill.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Mara+5FAlexander+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Friday, August 24, 2001 1:10 PM
      To:     Nelson, Cheryl
      Subject:  FW: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
   S.A.

      Hi Cheryl,

      I haven't had a response to our queries about putting in place an
   ISDA
      between Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. and
our
      Geneva affiliate, Cargill International, S.A. ("CISA").  We've
been
      trying to get negotiations started since January; I was hoping you
      could direct me to the appropriate party to contact at Enron so
that
      we can get things moving on this ISDA?

      Many thanks,
      Mara Alexander
      Sr. Documentation Analyst
      Cargill, Incorporated
      Tel: 952.984.3417
      Fax: 952.984.3872
      e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

************************************************************************
      This message is meant to be read only by the recipient(s) listed
   above.
      Information in this message may be confidential and protected by
      privilege.  If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please delete
all
      versions and contact Mara Alexander at the above location.

************************************************************************

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Alexander, Mara /xtwn
      Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:41 AM
      To: 'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'
      Subject: RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
   S.A.

      Dear Cheryl,

      I've again had inquiries from our Geneva affiliate, Cargill
      International, S.A. ("CISA") regarding an ISDA Master Agreement
      with Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.  Are
      you still the attorney who would be handling this Agreement?
      If not, could you kindly advise whom I should contact?

      I assume that Enron would prefer to send the initial draft
      documents.  If this is the case, please note that CISA enters
      into its ISDA Master Agreements without benefit of a Credit
      Support Provider or a Credit Support Annex.  Regarding their
      administrative details, their address is:
         Cargill International S.A.,
         14 chemin De-Normandie,
         1206 GENEVA, Switzerland,
      Mailing address:
         P.O. Box 383,
         1211 GENEVA 12,
         Switzerland
         Attention:     Energy Swaps Administration,
                   David Merrilees
         Telex No.:     422893  TRX CH
         Tel. No.:      (41) 22/703 2113
         Fax No.:  (41) 22/703 2122

      Process Agent (under English law):
         Cargill Financial Markets PLC
         Knowle Hill Park
         Fairmile Lane, Cobham
         Surrey, KT11 2PD ENGLAND
         ATTN:  Legal Department.

      Please let me know if you have any questions, or if there is
      anything we can do to help facilitate the onset of negotiations.

      Best Regards,
      Mara Alexander
      Sr. Documentation Analyst
      Cargill, Incorporated
      Tel: 952.984.3417
      Fax: 952.984.3872
      e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Alexander, Mara /xtwn
      Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:08 AM
      To: 'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'
      Subject: RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
   S.A.

      Cheryl,

      Cargill International, S.A. confirms that they would like to put
an
      ISDA Master Agreement in place with Enron Capital & Trade
Resources
      International Corp.   This is the Enron entity with which they're
      doing all of their petroleum derivatives trading.

      Thanks again for looking into this matter.  Please let me know if
      you should have any further questions.

      Regards,
      Mara Alexander
      Sr. Documentation Analyst
      Cargill, Incorporated
      Tel: 952.984.3417
      Fax: 952.984.3872
      e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [mailto:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:38 PM
      To: alexander, mara /xtwn
      Subject: RE: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International,
   S.A.

      Mara,

      The answer may turn on a key question.  What products would be
      traded?Where
      are the trades going to come from?

      Cheryl Nelson
      Senior Counsel
      EB3875
      (713) 345-4693

                          Mara_Alexander@c

                          argill.com              To:
      Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com
                                                  cc:

                          02/02/2001 11:08        Subject:     RE: Re:
ISDA
      Master Agreement for
                          AM                      Cargill International,
   S.A.

      Thank you!  Let me know if/when you need anymore info.

      Rgds,
      Mara

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [mailto:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
      Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:53 AM
      To: alexander, mara /xtwn
      Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement for Cargill International, S.A.

      Sara, I had already begun to look into this so I can take care of
it.

                          Mara_Alexander@c

                          argill.com              To:
      Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com,

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com

                          02/02/2001 07:34        cc:
      Edward.Sacks@enron.com
                          AM                      Subject:     ISDA
Master
      Agreement
                                                  for Cargill
   International,
      S.A.

      Dear Sara & Cheryl,

      I have been asked by our affiliate in Geneva, Cargill
      International, S.A. ("CISA"), to begin negotiations for
      them on an ISDA Master Agreement with Enron.

      There had been some question as to which Enron entity
      was to enter into an ISDA with CISA, but the latest
      information they had (possibly from someone in an Enron
      office in London?) was that it should be Enron Capital
      & Trade Resources International Corp.  FYI, Cargill
      International, S.A. is located and incorporated in Geneva.

      Could you kindly advise whom I should be contacting to
      confirm this is indeed the proper Enron entity and with
      whom I should be speaking to begin negotiations?  Please
      also let me know if there is anything that needs to be
      done from a Credit or Trading perspective in order to
      get this ISDA started on Enron's part.

      Thanks and Regards,
      Mara Alexander
      Sr. Documentation Analyst
      Cargill, Incorporated
      Tel: 952.984.3417
      Fax: 952.984.3872
      e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

**********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for
the
   sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
   or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please
   contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
   message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
   be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding
   and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates)
   and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
on
   by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank
   you.

**********************************************************************


Northeast RTO Mediation Report

The Commissioners heard a report from the ALJ who presided over the Northeast RTO mediation.  As you may recall, the Judge did not support our position (which was to get a single Northeast RTO up and running, with PJM leadership and based on the PJM system) by no later than November 2003 (the PJM proposal).  As expected, the Judge reiterated his disagreement with the PJM proposal and urged the Commission to take a "go slower" approach that includes a minimum 12 month up-front assessment of technology and "best practices" determinations.

Pat Wood first questioned why the Board makeup should consist of existing ISO board members.  He acknowledged that the existing ISO board members have experience but questioned whether the benefit of having their experience is outweighed by the possibility of continued parochial interests that may be retained by these board members.  He thinks perhaps the board should be made up of totally new board members.  Ironically, in the mediation only a couple of consumer advocate-types supported this type of approach.  Everyone else believed that using the existin ISO board members makes more sense since they all have experience.  We supported a board makeup weighted in favor of PJM so that implementation of the PJM system would be assured.  Pat seems to think this presents too much of a political problem.

Pat also expressed concern that FERC not take action that would upset the existing, functioning markets.  He said FERC should not force a result if it does not know what the outcome will be and could disrupt the existing markets.  He questioned whether they should take a different, slower approach in the northeast, perhaps putting some regional functions into place soon (e.g., interregional transmission planning and expansion) and put off other issues (a single real time balancing market) that may be harder to implement at first.  Pat says that technology assessment is a big issue and can be a show stopper if it is not done correctly.  Under the PJM proposal, the new RTO would form by the end of the year and would start market design (based on the PJM system) immediately.  Doing an upfront assesment could delay implementation significantly.  He said perhaps some things can be done sooner than 18-24 months.  If he is thinking that long-term is 18-24 months, then we could be okay because the PJM plan takes 24 months to implement.  But, his statements on technical assessment are troubling and sound like he may be willing to delay the startup of market design until this takes place.

On the positive side, Nora Brownell reminded everyone that New York and PJM have very similar systems but they have a lot of problems working together and that these problems may be a hindrance to the developing retail markets.  She seems to think that things cannot remain as they are.

Nothing was decided and it is unclear when FERC will issue an order in this proceeding.  We will keep you posted.

Sarah


yes--lets talk at 9:30 to prep for the 10:00.  df


Change of mailing address:

49 bancroft mills unit 2J
wilmington DE 19806

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Gioffre
dgioffre@hotmail.com

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Team,
This meeting will replace the Daily Conference Call held this Wednesday at
10:30 AM. Please review the attachments for the 2001 Objectives prior to the
meeting. For those individuals who are in Houston we have secured 3AC 3529 -
Dial In number remains the same.
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Moore/HOU/EES on 03/26/2001
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Diane De Benedictis
03/26/2001 08:55 AM
To: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Elizabeth Moore/HOU/EES@EES, Monique Milton/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Employee SMP Training Presentation - Wed March 28th

Erik,

Commodity Origination - California is scheduled for Employee Strategy
Management Process (SMP) Presentation at 10:30 AM CST on Wednesday, March
28th, location: 3AC3529 (3 Allen Center in Houston).

Additionally, the presentation is designed to give you time to review
Commodity Origination's 2001 Objectives, Measures, and Targets as displayed
on the attached Scorecard:

Since some department employees will be connecting/participating via SameTime
Virtual Meeting software, I have attached a document to guide you through the
steps to use it.  To accommodate the audio portion of the presentation,
please use the conference call number provided by Elizabeth Moore.

Please contact me or Monique Milton (ext. 66144) if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Diane de Benedictis
Mgr, SMP
EES
Ext. 5-6802


To:								Department:  	ENA Legal

From:		Mark Taylor					Date:	May 11, 2001
		Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:	Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/08/2000 08:14:59 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Dear Vince
I will be happy to meet with you. Please let me know when you will be here.
I will check among our students who may be interested. I have a Ph.D.
student that is very good but he is still in the pipeline.
Shmuel.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<ashley.baxter@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

> Shmuel,
>
> I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram Sogomonian, a
> good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible, among
> other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or technical
> backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give you a
> call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would join me
> as well.
>
> I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst / Associate
> Program.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
> Vincent Kaminski
> Managing Director - Research
> Enron Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street
> Room EB1962
> Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
> Phone: (713) 853 3848
> Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 10:17 AM
---------------------------
Eric Bass   01/26/2001 10:12 AM

To: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com
cc:
Subject: Paintball Tomorrow

We are getting a group together to play paintaball tomorrow at around 10 am.
We will be playing at Adventure Village (just north of Intercontinental
Airport on FM 1960).  Their website is www.adventurevillage.com.  The total
cost should be somewhere between $30-$40 per person ( about $15 for a gun and
$6 per 100 paintballs).  Let me know if you can make it.

-Eric


By way of introduction, I am the director of global risk operations reporting
to Sally Beck.  One of my responsibilities is to help new Enron offices set
up risk control functions.  I have been speaking with Milind Laad and Heidi
Hellman, located in India, concerning the marketing and origination of coal,
liquid fuels, gas and power transacted by the Indian office.

I was wondering what your understanding of the Indian office's
trading/marketing/origination plans are as coal and liquids and what type of
trading authorizations you have given them to date.  I understand that any
coal deals done by India will be included in George's book and any liquids
deals done will be included in John's book.

Thanks,

Shona
713 853 9123


We would like to give everyone an update on activities surrounding our DRA (BCP).   Please feel free to invite anyone we may have missed from our distribution list.

Thanks.  Jean and Bob


I will be leaving the office at 12 today.  Dana should be here to assist you
in my absence.

Rufino


We Agree with the nominations.

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/21/2001 11:08:26 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM, LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS/ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/20/01

NOM       MCF       MMBTU
50,000         46,771         48,034

BTU = 1.027


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 18, 2001 5:00pm through May 21, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:30:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at    9:30:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  5:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Upgrade IOS on ENEFW4
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: The new code has bug fixes and stateful failover feature.
Backout: Revert back to old IOS.
Contact(s):  John Shupak          713-853-7943
  Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s):  Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Wed 5/16/2001 at  4:45:00 PM CT thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  4:45:00 PM CT
 Wed 5/16/2001 at  2:45:00 PM PT thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  2:45:00 PM PT
 Wed 5/16/2001 at  10:45:00 PM London thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  10:45:00 PM
London
Outage:  Market Data Cable Management EB3460
Environments Impacted:  All Trading Groups
Purpose: Improve computer room environment.  Perform cable management in
order to comply with computer room standards.
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 29, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at    8:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Moving Production Database TDSPROD
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose: This database is being moved to give the space it is currently using
to the Enpower database on that server.  The new server Refraction will also
allow TDSPROD to expand as well.
Backout: The old instance will be restarted and the TNSNAMES.ORA entry will
be changed to point at the old instance.
Contact(s):  John Jahnke    713-345-4398

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at   10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/20/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Resource addition for server moe.
Environments Impacted:  Sitara, PEP, Global
Purpose: Server is memory and cpu constrained.
Backout: Shutdown the server and revert to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:   Also see above
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at   2:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at   10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Resource additionto Sitara server aurora.
Environments Impacted:  Sitara production
Purpose: Add needed cpu and memory.
Backout: Remove the newly added resources and restart under the old config.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  3:00:00 PM thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  11:45:00 PM
Outage:  Unify Power Production Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Infrastructure required maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s):  Brian Ripley          713-345-4709
  Charles Ballmer    713-853-0684
  Bob Ward              713-345-4409

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: Australia
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 19-May-2001 at  10:00:00 AM Sydney thru Sat 19-May-2001 at 3:00:00
PM Sydney
 Sat 19-May-2001 at  1:00:00 AM GMT (London) thru Sat 19-May-2001 at  6:00:00
AM GMT (London)
 Fri 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT (Houston) thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
CT (Houston)
 Fri 5/19/2001 at 5:00:00 PM PT (Portland)  thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00
PM PT (Portland)
Outage: Sydney UPS Test & Service
Environments Impacted:  Corp Sydney - all systems
Purpose: Original UPS needs testing & service. Will require Server Room to be
de-powered to allow maintenance.
Backout: Plug equipment into unconditioned power.
Contact(s):  Colin Wood    +61-416-248-353
  Elliott Katz +61-292-292-309

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Curve Validation

Last week, I spoke with Sally and asked her to kick off curve validations respective to all desks.  I emphasized that curve accuracy is particularly important.  Although probabilities exist that Dynegy will mark book down, I think it would be wise that this process not be a deal buster.  Do you want me to communicate this to desk heads?

Frank


On the attached list:

CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company:  Credit is opening them up for
Can & US gas, which I am fine with.  I already had them open for financial.
Make sure they're shut down for physical power.

Westpac:  I just approved that one on the 1/5/01 list.  There should be no
changes from that list.  Enron Australia has an ISDA Master in place with
them, as does ENA, so we are OK with them transacting all financial,
including all Australia financial.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	meet w/ Nick EB3127

Date:		10/27/2000
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:50 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


I don't know.  I would suggest that you ask Cynthia Barrow for starters.  Sorry I am so clueless.  MHC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zarkowsky, Sarah
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Goode, Diane
Subject:	Bridgeline

I am working with Jeanie Slone on the Bridgeline rollover.  In working on the 401K plan, I need to know whether the Texaco/Enron employees will be treated as Terminated or will they fall under the Same Desk Rule.

Thanks,
Sarah Zarkowsky
x53791


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
01:13 PM ---------------------------

"Christi Smith" <christi.smith@lrinet.com> on 08/31/2000 10:32:49 AM
Please respond to <christi.smith@lrinet.com>
To: <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>
cc: "Debbie Nowak (E-mail)" <dnowak@enron.com>, "Deborah Evans (E-mail)"
<debe@fsddatasvc.com>
Subject: Receipt of Team Selection Form - Executive Impact & Influence Program

Hi Phillip.  We appreciate your prompt attention and completing the Team
Selection information.

Ideally, we needed to receive your team of raters on the Team Selection form
we sent you.  The information needed is then easily transferred into the
database directly from that Excel spreadsheet.  If you do not have the
ability to complete that form, inserting what you listed below, we still
require additional information.

We need each person's email address.  Without the email address, we cannot
email them their internet link and ID to provide feedback for you, nor can
we send them an automatic reminder via email.  It would also be good to have
each person's phone number, in the event we need to reach them.

So, we do need to receive that complete TS Excel spreadsheet, or if you need
to instead, provide the needed information via email.

Thank you for your assistance Phillip.

Christi L. Smith
Project Manager for Client Services
Keilty, Goldsmith & Company
858/450-2554

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip K Allen [mailto:Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:03 PM
To: debe@fsddatasvc.com
Subject:

John Lavorato-M

Mike Grigsby-D
Keith Holst-D
Frank Ermis-D
Steve South-D
Janie Tholt-D

Scott Neal-P
Hunter Shively-P
Tom Martin-P
John Arnold-P


did he tell you if he was coming or not?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

Ya, I talked to him he said he would email you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

I haven't heard back form Tom yet, but everyone else is going.
Can you get in touch with him?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
So who all is coming and isn't?  I know Jeff can't make it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'Bass, Eric'
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
That sounds like fun.  The date of the party is January 19, 2002.
Invites
Dad
Scott
smacfarland@gpch.org
Jeff Scott
jayandem@earthlink.net
Brian Lisenby
I will get that one
Ramiro Castano
lqcolombo@aol.com
Tom Fielder
tommybomb88@hotmail.com
Billy Brown
Billy.Brown2@COMPAQ.com

I think that is all.  I will finalize in the next couple of days.
Would you please send me your address?
Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [ <mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:35 PM
To: jbass@stdauto.com
Subject: Bachelor Party
<http://www.txtreasure.com/>

what do you think about this.

and you still need to send me a list of invitees (with e-mail)   and the date of the party.

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
HELTON, JENNIFER                JEFFREY T HODGE                 May 22, 2000
HYVL, DANIEL J                  JEFFREY T HODGE                 May 24, 2000


sounds like cap on stages 1-3 based on least efficient, marginal unit.  jeff


I never doubted you.  Thanks.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jackson, Brandee
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:57 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	RE: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Yes,

They send this message to everyone for some reason.  I have already sent your receipts.  Just ignore
the message.  Sorry.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Daren J.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:14 AM
To:	Jackson, Brandee
Subject:	FW: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Brandee,

Can you look into this?

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:33 AM
To:	Jerry Farmer
Subject:	Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Jerry Farmer
Report Name:   Daren Farmer
Report Date:   9/7/01
Report ID:     82C5AABDA37B11D5B43E
Submitted On:  9/7/01

Receipts for this expense report have not yet been received. If receipts have been mailed, please disregard this message.