Dear Managers & Supervisors,
Thank you for your participation and contributions to the Year End 2000 PRC
process.    It was a privilege for me to witness all of you making decisions
that were beneficial to Enron and the development of the employees that you
supervise.    Now what remains to be done is to give your employees their
feedback verbally and in written form.
I encourage all of you to complete your employee's evaluations before bonuses
and merit increases are given on 2/5/01.

Please remember:

 All employees in non-bonusable categories must have their performance
evaluations reviewed by HR and Legal before the evaluation is presented to
the employee.
Rankings will remain confidential and will not be communicated to employees.
HR will participate as observers of some reviews.

Let us know how we can assist you,
Your HR Team


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving the following hours in the October 2, 2001 Real-Time
Market per 20010908B to verify prices:

HQ:  1:00
OH:  None
NE:  None
PJM: 5:00 and 6:00

All other prices in the October 2, 2001 Real-Time Market are correct.
Prices in the October 3, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
09:44 AM ---------------------------
From: Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 09:14 AM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

Louise,

Thank you for your suggestion. I agree that it is critical for us to get
feedbacks from Geof as early as possible. For instance, Geof suggested some
changes to the design last Friday. The suggestion requires some re-work on
the user interface and some changes in the daily risk management process.

I love to have the team meet Geof daily. I will check with Geof for his
availability.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Wei, Zhiyong
Subject: Re: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

I think we need to get a lot closer together - I expect Geoff (and the
analyst working for Geoff on this) to be spending a lot more time down on the
IT floors.  If we integrate at a much earlier stage we might not see any
divergence from how Geoff sees the end result to what actually appears.

Could you consider how to get your team spending much more time with Geoff -
I would suggest you have a daily time when you all (developers included) sit
down around a desk to look at progress.

Let me know what you think?

Louise

From: Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 06:55 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth
Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

Attached please find the Inception Document for Gas Trading Vision II Phase
II. I would appreciate your comments. I will be circulating the document for
signatures on Wednesday. Please provide your inputs by then.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 << File: inception_GTV II phase 2.doc >>


I've been working pretty long hours recently.  I'd like to do it, but won't
really know my schedule until tomorrow.  Can I give you a buzz then?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Randall Schriver (E-mail)
Subject: LAST MINUTE - DINNER OR A BEER TUESDAY??

Randy --

Last minute, I'm coming to DC today through Wednesday afternoon.  Any
chance to grab dinner or a beer?  You're probably swamped, but thought
I'd check.  I'm staying at Park Hyatt  (24 and M) - leave a number if it
works 202-419-6795.

Thanks,

Jim

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Approved.  Do we have extra monitors/keyboards already on the floor?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 05:27 PM -----

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/28/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ECT
		 cc: Samantha Boyd@Enron, Mary Cook@ECT
		 Subject: New Equipment

Mark:

Samantha Boyd is in need of a new computer monitor/ keyboard.  The monitor
screen is visibly unclear which makes it extremely difficult to read.  In
addition, the keys on the key board are sticky.  With your authorization, can
these items be replaced with new equipment?

Please advise.

Thanks,
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kristann Shireman/HOU/EES on 05/08/2001
10:11 AM ---------------------------

Kristann Shireman
05/08/2001 08:48 AM
To: Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:

Subject: Purchase Malin and Socal Topock

Please provide me with your Physical offer for the following volumes:
The volumes are in monthly volumes.
Thanks
Kris Shireman

MALIN

06/2001:  44,997
07/2001:  41,838
08/2001:   46,070
09/2001:    39,859
10/2001:    37,283
11/2001:    28,038
12/2001:    31,431
01/2002:    23,643
02/2002:    21,228
03/2002:     10,546
04/2002:     15,851
05/2002:     23,528
06/2002:     33,978
07/2002:     32,611
08/2002;     34,332
09/2002:     30,093
10/2002:     28,214
11/2002:     23,518
12/2002:     23,030
01/2003:     17,963
02/2003:     17,820
03/2003:      16,651
04/2003:      15,640
05/2003:      23,212
06/2003:      33,520
07/2003:      32,117
08/2003:      33,878
09/2003:      29,681
10/2003:      27,869
11/2003:      23,155
12/2003:      22,721
01/2004:      17,721
02/2004:      16,973
03/2004:      16,430
04/2004:      15,419
05/2004:       22,896
06/2004:      33,057
07/2004:      31,628
08/2004:      33,431
09/2004:      29,273
10/2004:      27,491
11/2004:      22,843
12/2004;      22,423
01/2005:      17,482
02/2005;      16,748
03/2005:      16,211
04/2005:      15,200
05/2005:      22,585
06/2005:      32,600


Those should be paid like his regular expenses.  Please let me know if
someone raises an objection.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Becky Tlucek                           05/21/99 10:58 AM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Brent Hendry

Mark,

Brent needs to pay his IOLTA Statement and Attorney Occupation Tax.  Could
you let me know if these
charges are to be paid out of your budget?

-Becky


Amanda,

Thanks for your note.  It looks to me like the schedule breaks down as
follows:

Possible Date: October 12 - 15
My Reaction: I will be speaking at a conference in Sedona, AZ (not known for
its great sailing)

Possible Date: November 3 - 8
My Reaction: I have another speaking engagement in NYC right after that
(makes it sub-optimal for me) plus Bill can't go

Possible Date: Thanksgiving
My Reaction: You guys can't make it

Possible Date: New Years (travel Sat. 12/30, pick up boat 12/31, back in the
office Mon. 1/8/01)
My Reaction: Everybody can go - and since Monday is a holiday only 4 vacation
days used for a full week of sailing - Perfect in every way (if we can get
flights and a boat - I haven't checked this yet)

Possible Date: Later in 2001
My Reaction: Works for me but I hate to put it off so long

So my preference is to try for New Years and fall back on early November as a
second choice.  If you want to go for less than a week now and a full week in
2001 when Bill can go we can do that, too.  What are you guys thinking?
Since we won't be going at Thanksgiving, how are you going to talk your mom
into dealing with the holiday?

Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 09:25 AM
---------------------------

"Modi, Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com> on 10/05/2000 03:09:34 AM
To: "'jonathan.hoff@enron.com'" <jonathan.hoff@enron.com>
cc: "'don.miller@enron.com'" <don.miller@enron.com>, "Al-Farisi, Omar"
<omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com>
Subject: Data Room and Site Visit Procedures

Jonathan-

Attached for your review is the updated data room and site visit procedures
document.  We have a few questions that I would like to discuss with you
tomorrow morning if you are available.  Thanks.

 Best Regards,

 Rishi Modi
> 212-325-9130  (phone)
> 212-325-8047  (fax)
 rishi.modi@csfb.com

> CREDIT | FIRST
> SUISSE | BOSTON
> Global Energy &
>         Project Finance Group

 <<Data Room.doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Data Room.doc


Return-Path: <bodytech@pipeline.com>
Received: from  rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (rly-yd05.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.5]) by air-yd03.mail.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINYD33-0926141251; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:12:51 -0400
Received: from  johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177]) by rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYD55-0926141223; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:12:23 -0400
Received: from oemcomputer (pool-63.53.79.221.mhub.grid.net [63.53.79.221])	by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA23830;	Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:12:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Kathryn Ross-Nash" <bodytech@pipeline.com>
To: "Bijouausi@aol. com" <Bijouausi@aol.com>,        "BGodthing@aol. com" <BGodthing@aol.com>,        "Bertrande Coleman" <bertrande@mindspring.com>,        "Basilb@Earthlink. Net" <basilb@earthlink.net>,        "BABS1721@aol. com" <BABS1721@aol.com>,        "Aussies4me@aol. com" <Aussies4me@aol.com>,        "Aussieposse312@aol. com" <Aussieposse312@aol.com>,        "Ann Turner" <aturner@mosquitonet.com>, "ATLI" <ATLI@compaq.net>,        "ARabara15@aol. com" <ARabara15@aol.com>,        "Andreozzi Megan" <andreom@HESKA.com>,        "Ameaglepgr@aol. com" <Ameaglepgr@aol.com>,        "Altager@Home. Com" <altager@home.com>,        "Marge Pillion" <ahuihou@ilhawaii.net>
Subject: FW: SCARY  please read  (better safe than sorry)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:13:24 -0400
Message-ID: <001801c146b6$eec0f5e0$dd4f353f@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C14695.67AF55E0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3

-----Original Message-----
From: Mandy L. Chirafisi  [mailto:missmandy@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:07  PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;;
Subject: Fw: SCARY please  read (better safe than sorry)
I wonder if these imbeciles realize what's going  on in this country or do they find their stupidity more  interesting?
A t t e n t i o n :
This is very scary and is not a joke. Please  read - it definitely is a
serious threat to our lives and health. This is  an alert about a virus
in the original sense of the word...... one that  affects
your body.....not your hard drive. There have been  23
confirmed cases of people attacked by the Klingerman Virus,
a virus  that arrives in your real mailbox, not
in your e-mail inbox. Someone has  been mailing large blue
envelopes, seemingly at random, to people in the  U.S. and Canada.
On the front of the envelope in bold black
letters is  printed " A Gift For You From The Klingerman Foundation".
When  the envelopes are opened, there is a small sponge sealed
in plastic. This  sponge carries what has come to be known as the
and public health  officials state this is a strain of virus
they have not previously  encountered. Those who have come in contact
with the Klingerman Virus  have been hospitalized with severe dysentery. So
far
seven of the  twenty-three victims have died. There is no legimitate
Klingerman  Foundation, mailing unsolicited gifts. If you receive an
oversized blue  envelope in the mail marked "A Gift For You From The
Klingerman  Foundation". Do not open it !!!!! Place it in a strong
plastic bag  or container & call the police immediately. The "gift"  is
one you defiinitely do not want to open.
PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE  THAT YOU CARE ABOUT!

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Steve and Christian

Could you please review and let me know what you think of this?  There is a
call on Thurs at 200 (Central) to discuss.  Do you want to participate?
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 03:45 PM -----

	"Edmonds, Sonnet" <sonnet.edmonds@SouthernEnergy.Com>
	11/01/2000 03:39 PM

		 To: "Pooya, Babak" <Babak.Pooya@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Edmonds, Sonnet"
<sonnet.edmonds@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Chornyak, Paula"
<Paula.Chornyak@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Eckersley, Trevin"
<Trevin.Eckersley@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "Redding, David"
<david.redding@SouthernEnergy.Com>, "'fmdutton@aep.com'" <fmdutton@aep.com>,
"'Shari.stack@enron.com'" <Shari.stack@enron.com>,
"'elizabeth.sager@enron.com'" <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>,
"'drusso@reliantenergy.com'" <drusso@reliantenergy.com>,
"'rosteen@powersrc.com'" <rosteen@powersrc.com>,
"'gmatthews@edisonmission.com'" <gmatthews@edisonmission.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO draft definition rewording

I've attempted to draft language for the "CAISO Schedule Adjustment"
definition, as we discussed yesterday.  We can discuss this proposed
language in our call tomorrow:

"CAISO Schedule Adjustment" means a schedule change implemented by the CAISO
on a schedule coordinator-schedule coordinator transaction after the CAISO's
final hourly scheduling deadline for the transaction, and on which
transaction the CAISO imposes Inc and Dec Prices.  Such schedule change
shall neither be caused by, nor within the control of, either Party.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a CAISO Schedule Adjustment shall not be
deemed to occur if the schedule change is due to (i) the curtailment of
imports into, or exports from, California; (ii) load deviations; (iii) the
failure of a Party to accurately submit or balance its schedule with the
CAISO.


Hi Team!

You are all invited to sit in on the Enron Travel Park training.  Details are below:

DATE:		Tuesday, October 16th
TIME:		11am to approximately 1:30pm
TOPIC:		How to use Enron's travel system on-line and via phone
HOSTS:	Tracy Ramsey (Enron) and Zou Cherry (Travel Agency in the Park)

If you plan to attend, please respond back to this note ASAP for a few reasons:

1.  We will be bringing in lunch and I need to know how many to order

2.  I will need to get you set up in their system prior to Tuesday

3.  I will need to ensure we are set with laptops and other training materials

To give you an idea about the kind of savings you can get by using this Enron feature, here's an example.  I booked a roundtrip flight from Denver>St. Louis which came up as $161, but with the Enron discount, I am paying $119.  As a comparison, on the United website, the same exact trip came in at $302.

Thank you,
Kristen


Sorry if you got this twice.............
-Faunce
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Faunce/US/Raytheon on
10/25/2001 10:11 AM ---------------------------

Charlie Toole <ctoole@boston-engineering.com> on 10/25/2001 10:03:23 AM

To:   sammidow@genuity.com, Justin.Barber@natick.army.mil,
      gbarroso@netnumina.com, mikebasl@hotmail.com, bensle@hotmail.com,
      cpb@epm-inc.com, bcohen@cisco.com, bsd@ksinc.net, sald@earthlink.com,
      jdipaoli@rjagroup.com, kdobecki@emc.com, gducharm@lytron.com,
      sduffey@sar.com, ddufort@home.com, ddufort@jersey.net,
      Matthew_Faunce@raytheon.com, gloverk@seas.smu.edu,
      jhone@lonzabiologics.com, mlang32696@aol.com, kledoux@avici.com,
      jmalboeu@husky.ca, GMasterson@hgi-fire.com, mnorris@aware.com,
      dolsen01@opal.tufts.edu, mong@osmonics.com, jason.papp@home.net,
      adelphoi@hotmail.com, aproulx@ludlowhq.com,
      S.Sienkiewicz@kidde-fenwal.com, timothy.w.spence@baesystems.com,
      jeremy_stevens@notes.teradyne.com, kstubert@juno.com,
      wsullivan@Brooks.com, VANDETTC@bsci.com, michaelwillock@yahoo.com,
      jeffrey.wilson@atlp.com, justin.woodfall@ae.ge.com
cc:

Subject:  Mike Marcoux

Many of you know this and some don't,

Mike Marcoux's mother passed away on Sunday.  In his mothers memory he has
setup a scholarship fund at the Webster Five Cents Savings bank.  I think
that it would be a nice gesture to make a donation.  I'm asking that people
contribute $10.  You can send more or nothing, it's your decision.  If you
like you can send the money to me:

199 River St. #2
Waltham, MA 02453

and I'll send one check or directly to the fund:

Phyllis M. Pratt Memorial Scholarship Fund,
c/o Webster Five Cents Savings Bank,
343 Main Street, Oxford, MA 01540.

Thanks,

PA

Toole

PS
Faunce could you forward this along to other SAE's?
Thanks.


This deal is gas ENA sold to CES for Energy Express.  The daily volume was
10,322 dth (a total of 309,660 for the month).  The price is CGAS IF + $.0175
+ Variable + $.02 demand for ENA transport

I just changed the price in Sitara.  My calculation shows a price of $4.6738.

Jeff, I apologize for this if you have sent out the invoice already.  Please
correct the invoice for this deal and let me know when you send it out.

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:42
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/05/2000 03:54:02 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: Exhibits for Austin and LV Cogen Facility Agreements

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - LV Cogen
redline_120400.DOC>>

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Austin redline _
120400.DOC>>

 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - LV Cogen redline_120400.DOC
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Austin redline _ 120400.DOC


Serge,

Tana Jones will forward it to you shortly.  Sorry for the delay.

Jason

	"Serge Martin (SGM)" <Sgm@Steelhector.com>
	07/12/2000 11:04 AM

		 To: jason.peters@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FPL follow up item

Jason:  Just one more thing (as Mr. Columbo would say).  You mentioned
last month that you expected, in response to my request, to be able to
send me a copy of your standard form of long-form ISDA confirm.  Could
you do so at this time?  Thanks, -Serge

Serge G. Martin
smartin@steelhector.com
Steel Hector & Davis LLP
200 South Biscayne Blvd.
Miami, Florida 33131-2398
(305) 577-7097 voice
(305) 577-7001 fax


Stephanie:  Are these identical to our docs?  need to check ASAP
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 05:47 PM -----

	Rodney Malcolm
	09/26/2000 04:29 PM

		 To: Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA documentation

Folks,

National Bank of Canada has forwarded the attached draft documents for our
review.  I asked if they had electronic versions of the ENA - NBC  documents
and they have apparently gone a step further and actually generated the draft
Garden State - NBC documentation without the confirms.  Finley will continue
to drive forward on the confirms.  I would appreciate any comments on the
attached documents by mid-day tomorrow so that we can possibly get this in
place.

Thanks,
Rodney
---------------------- Forwarded by Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

"Pace, Teresa" <Teresa.Pace@tres.bnc.ca> on 09/26/2000 03:45:26 PM
To: rodney.malcolm@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ISDA documentation

Please find enclosed draft ISDA documentation for Garden State

 <<Guarantee in favor of nbc Enron.doc>>  <<CRSUPP Garden State.doc>>
<<Usacorpo Garden State.doc>>

Please forward all comments to the undersigned

Teresa Pace
Section Manager
Directrice de Section
Legal Documentation-Treasury
Documentation L,gale-Tr,sorerie
Tel: (514) 397-5850
Fax:(514) 394-6271

 - Guarantee in favor of nbc Enron.doc
 - CRSUPP Garden State.doc
 - Usacorpo Garden State.doc


Steve,  We will probably use outside counsel that has worked with Crescendo
before to handle this from Crescendo's perspective.  I will coordinate from
ENA's perspective.  I am working with Teresa on this issue.

	Steve Pruett@ENRON
	01/23/2001 06:00 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gathering System PSA

Can you review the PSA on Crescendo's behalf, or is this something Teresa
Bushman or outside counsel should review?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Castiglione                           01/23/2001 04:04 PM

To: Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Don
Rollins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher B
Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Tyrell
Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gathering System PSA

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Castiglione/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001
04:03 PM ---------------------------

"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net> on 01/23/2001 03:52:04 PM
Please respond to <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
To: "Audrey O'Neil \(E-mail\)" <Audrey.ONeil@enron.com>, "Gerald R. Nemec
\(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>, "Mark Castiglione \(E-mail\)"
<Mark.Castiglione@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Gathering System PSA

I received the proposed PSA for the Wildhorse acquisition from Petrie
Parkman today.  I have attached for everyone's review.  We are required to
send back to TBI with proposed changes with our proposal.

Mark, would you please forward to those who need to see it besides Audrey
and Gerald.
Thx

Ken Krisa

 - PSA.DOC


Our outside Regulatory Counsel has heard that the CPUC will definitely vote
to suspend direct access on June 28 effective July 1.  We will be working
through formal comments and informal discussions to clarify the meaning of
the this suspension.

We are still working to try and modify the Proposed Decisions as they relate
to the PX Credit receivable, with our primary focus on removing this part of
the decision from a vote on June 28.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/21/2001
07:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Harry Kingerski on 06/20/2001 05:44 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Lamar
Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: DA Suspension in California

Mike Day just called to say he has heard the California PUC definitely will
vote on June 28 to suspend direct access, effective July 1, except for
written contracts executed prior to July 1, 2001.    Suspension of DA has
been identified by the Governor as a necessary prerequisite to bond
issuance.


In 1824:

John Q. Adams ran for President, son of former President John Adams.

In 2000:

George W. Bush ran for President, son of former President George Bush

In 1824:

John Q. Adams opponent was a man from Tennessee, Andrew Jackson

In 2000:

George W. Bush's opponent was a man from Tennessee, Albert Gore, Jr.

In 1824:

Andrew Jackson won the popular vote

In 2000:

Al Gore won the popular vote

In 1824:

John Q. Adams was elected by the "electors" as President of the United States

In 2000:

George W. Bush will probably be elected by the "electors" as President of the
United States

John Adams, the father, was a one-term President
George Bush, the father, was a one-term President
John Adams, the father, was preceded by a two term President and succeeded by
a two term President
George Bush, the father, was preceded by a two term President and succeeded
by a two term President

John Q Adams and Andrew Jackson squared off for a rematch after John Q's
first term.  John Q lost a re-election bid  in 1828.  John Q's predecessor
was James Monroe.  James Monroe had a wife who was elected Senator from New
York, Hillary Monroe.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cotten, Robert
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Wellhead Adjustments - May, 2001
Importance:	High

Daren,

Please see the attached file.

Bob


I believe this was intended for the other Susan Scott...I'm with Nat Gas Trading.

Thanks

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/11/2001 09:08 AM

To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	One RTO Entergy to GridSouth

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 09:08 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/02/2001 02:14 PM

To:	Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	One RTO Entergy to GridSouth

I talked with Rogers, who said that it makes sense for us to advocate one RTO from Entergy through Southern into GridSouth (presumably getting TVA to commit at some point to an RTO).  Florida should probably be separate.  SPP could be in this RTO or the Midwest.  Therefore, the overall theme that Jim discussed this morning (that FERC has started something somewhat positive, but should take the step to actually state that it wants these utilities to work toward one SE RTO) can be put into the GridSouth and Southern request for rehearing (Tom C. is getting the draft of this.)  Thanks.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Ronald Brzezinski on 05/28/2002 03:49:25 PM
To: Klaus Obel/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA Report

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002
04:04 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Alaadin Suliman                           05/28/2002 03:42 PM

To: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA Report

---------------------- Forwarded by Alaadin Suliman/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002
03:56 PM ---------------------------

"Peter Simpson" <simpson@garradhassan.co.uk> on 05/28/2002 01:25:47 PM
To: <stanley.ballard@ps.ge.com>
cc: <kevin.cousineau@ps.ge.com>, "Alaadin. Suliman"
<Alaadin.Suliman@enron.com>

Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA  Report

Stan,

I spoke to Alaadin when he was on his way to lunch, earlier today,
regarding the content of Section 3 of the Final SCADA Acceptance Test
Results report. My question should probably been addressed to you.

The question is: why are the screen dumps presented taken from records
of April 19, deviant from the data that Alaadin and I witnessed on April
18, as recorded on the typescript sheet 'Met-Mast Data record during
SCADA final ATP' that is included in this section of the report?

[The latter is correct, with the exception of a typo in the wind speed
data for turbine 31: this should read 11.6, not 1.6.]

The content of the three tables in Section 1, under the heading of Test
7.0 is erroneous:

a) the date should be April 18 and the times should correspond with the
records on the typescript sheet;

b) a number of wind speed and temperature values do not correspond with
those on the typescript sheet. This appears to result from an effort to
correlate data from April 19, as it appears on the screen dumps, with
data recorded on April 18.

I have some comments on the text preceding the tables.  I shall write
separately regarding that.

Peter.


Look at comments below.

Julie

Daren J Farmer
12/20/99 01:43 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Evergreen deals

Julie,

I need to know if the following deals have evergreen provisions to roll into
Jan 2000.

Cokinos / 9676  95912 - No this is a GTC Firm contract, deal expires with
contract
Cokinos / 6373  128952 - This is a GTC Spot
Coral / 4120  93883 - This is on a Single Transaction contract, we would need
to check with the trader
Encina / 6392  93487 - Yes, this is a committed reserve.  I marked the
evergreen flag.
Midcoast / 5097  92956 - No, GTC 1st Purchaser, deal expires with contract.
United O&M / 5053 93728 - No, this deal was moved to the Wellhead portfolio
for January, but the deal was terminated per legal.
Vintage / 2540  93750 - Not the right deal number.

Thanks.

D


why, is he equipped to be a prostitute?

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:49 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE:

And Colby is just the man for the "job".

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Brian Constantine
Subject: Re:

Funny...I was just thinking of some tender,juicy things that could be done 'outback'.

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:44 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE:

Hey, Brian, I was just thinking about what's real and authentic, and started wondering how Colby was doing.  How is he?  Do you think you could get him out to the lease this year?

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:37 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Brian Constantine
Subject: Re:

That is an all time winner right there...I think I'll use that at work today!

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:18 PM
To: Joe Parks (E-mail); Erik Wollam (E-mail); Brad Corrier (E-mail); Brian Constantine (E-mail); Chad Knipe (E-mail)
Subject: FW:

Regardless of your position on using or having guns, this is one of the
> best comeback lines of all time. It is a portion of a  National Public
> Radio (NPR) interview between a female broadcaster and US  Marine Corps
> General Reinwald who was about to sponsor a Boy Scout Troop  visiting his
> military installation.
> >
> > FEMALE INTERVIEWER: So, General Reinwald, what things are you going to
> teach  these young boys when they visit your base?
> >
> > GENERAL REINWALD: We're going to teach them climbing, canoeing, archery,
> and  shooting.
> >
> > FEMALE INTERVIEWER: Shooting! That's a bit irresponsible, isn't it?
> >
> > GENERAL REINWALD: I don't see why, they'll be properly supervised on the
> rifle range.
> >
> > FEMALE INTERVIEWER: Don't you admit that this is a terribly dangerous
> activity to be teaching children?
> >
> > GENERAL REINWALD: I don't see how. We will be teaching them proper rifle
> discipline before they even touch a firearm.
> >
> > FEMALE INTERVIEWER: But you're equipping them to become violent killers.
> >
> > GENERAL REINWALD: Well, you're equipped to be a prostitute, but you're
> not  one, are you?
> >
> > The radio went silent and the interview ended.
>


To all

rough pass at EPC draw schedule in attached Excel for 2,3,4,5 and 6 unit
plants - assumes two week spacing on start up - based on normal simple cycle
deal. If we need to do major LM6000 payments up front then we should have a
front end weighted curve (I will go ahead and generate a front-ended curve
for each config) - depends on how we really extract each from WestLB deal -
above my pay grade to know those lofty things.

Data is based on ElectriCities installation schedule from Nepco, we are
working to see if we can compress actual time in field as part of reducing
project anticipated cost so might be better once Mike Coleman and Bruce work
our magic. % are from my vast experience and would be challenged and derided
if a real cost engineer looks at them but at least they add to 100% (I hope)
and sort of match our Hainan experience with three of these LM6000's.

Bruce


Sorry..... I am referring to the weather presentation.  I sent the original message last Wednesday.. The meeting is today at 3:00.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bates, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 1:55 PM
To:	Neal, Scott; Taylor, Gary
Cc:	Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim; Zivley, Jill T.; Culotta, Lindsay; Frihart, Bryant; Giron, Darron C.; Mims, Patrice L.; Murrell, Russell E; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Tucker, Patrick
Subject:	RE: meeting this afternoon

I apologize, but the new system had problems and the scheduler just got back with me.

Conf Room 05075


eSource presents Investext training

Investext offers immediate online delivery of original-image and full-text
research reports from more than 800 of the world's top investment banks,
market research firms, and trade associations.  This product is designed to
provide all the information you need to know about a particular company,
industry, or market.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Querying by company ticker in order to retrieve analyst reports.
? Querying via Investexts free text module to retrieve industry-specific
information: including statistics, economic indicators, analysis, trends,
forecasts and surveys.

Attend one of our Investext Clinics:

May. 11 - 10:30 -11:30 AM  EB572

And

May. 16 - 10:30 -11:30 AM  EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


should we invite mark wadington?

Jeff

	From:  Cathy Phillips                           12/14/2000 03:27 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: carol_benter@mckinsey.com, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting Confirmation

This is to confirm that the meeting to discuss crude and petrochemical ideas
has been scheduled for Thursday, January 11, 2001, from 2:00 to 5:00 p.m.
The meeting is scheduled to take place at the McKinsey & Company office
located at 2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin, Suite 3500.  You may park in the 2
Houston Center parking garage on McKinney.  The attendees are as follows:

 Mike McConnell
 Jeff Shankman
 John Nowlan
 Jeff Donahue
 Suzanne Nimocks
 Ron Hume

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
713-853-6898


I love you.


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for 7/14/2000.

Robin, I'm expecting our position to be flat.  Please contact me at x3-5070
if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Monica for Kyle


Hi Stephanie,

We should do but it pre-dates me and my colleagues (at least four years ago) so I don't have a copy and my job has moved departments a few times.
I have left a message with my contact at Carr in London to see if they have a version their side.
I settle our IPE futures account with Carr daily will this be affected by this guaranty business?

regards

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie
Sent: 20 November 2001 16:34
To: Canney, James
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

James,
Can you confirm whether or not ECTRIC has a futures agreement with Carr Futures and what the date of such agreement is?  We need to provide Carr with an Enron Corp. Guaranty.

Thanks,
Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Horn, Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Glover, Sheila; Panus, Stephanie
Cc: Hall, D. Todd
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Please talk to James Canney as he works with Carr daily.  There should be an ECTRIC agreement but have never seen it so....
Thanks Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Panus, Stephanie
Cc: Hall, D. Todd; Horn, Cindy
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Stephanie,
Todd or Cindy may be able to help you. Todd and Cindy: Do you know if ECTRIC has an agreement with CARR Futures?
Sheila

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Glover, Sheila
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Sheila,
Do you know who in London works on futures/brokerage agreements?  I'm trying to find out if ECTRIC has an agreement with Carr.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:42 PM
To: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Stephanie:

Scroll all the way down to Sheila's original message for contact person and the two Enron companies being guaranteed.  You will need to verify with London that ECTRIC has a futures agreement with Carr (maybe you can get a copy of it for our records).  Can you prepare a draft guaranty and ask Tanya for a cap.  Thanks.  Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya; Shackleton, Sara
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Pls see me original e-mail below.
sg

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Glover, Sheila
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

I assume the parties are  ENA and ECTRIC with Carr Futures, Inc. I do not have any information about this though nor do I have a contact.  Sheila can you provide this information to Sara?

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Tanya:  Just let us know the parties and guaranty cap.  I am not familiary with any Carr arrangements other than the ENA futures agreement.  Also, do you have a contact at Carr?

Thanks.  Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya; Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

No objections

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:51 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: FW: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Are there any objections to issuing the gty? We just did the same thing last week for FIMAT Issuing seems the simplest rather than having to stop trading, although traditionally we have not issued corp gtys.  Please advise.

Tanya

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Su, Ellen
Subject: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Tanya,
I received a call from Carr Futures this morning.  Their parent, Cr?dit Agricole Indosuez, is requesting a parent guanantee to continue trading with Enron North America Corp. and Enron Capital and Trade Resources International.

I spoke with Gary this morning and he said that we could stop trading with them.  I said that others do trade with Carr.  He suggested then that the energy guys can proceed if they wish to continue trading with Carr.

Rick Farina, 312-441-4420, called me with Larry Anderson and Patty Chambers.

How do you want to proceed?

Sheila


When: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB1962

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Commercialization of ENE Research/.Risk Management products.


Thank you for joining Greg Whalley at the 2001 CSC Spring Golf Classic -
Memorial Park Golf Course (Benefiting the Children's Museum)

 Whalley's Team   Enron's Team

G. Whalley    M. McConnell
B. White    T. Battaglia
J. Lavorato    G. Piper
D. Delainey    D. Black

EVENT SCHEDULE - Tuesday, April 24

10:30 a.m.  Registration
11:00 a.m.  Lunch catered by Becks Prime
11:45 a.m.  Tournament Rules for 4 Person Florida Scramble
12:00 Noon  Shotgun Start
4:00 - 5:00 p.m.  2001 Enron Jr. Golf Clinic w/ the staff of The First Tee
Program at
    Whispering Pines
5:30 p.m.  Awards Celebration

2001 ENRON JUNIOR GOLF CLINIC

The Junior Golf Clinic that will be held at the Driving Range from 4:00 p.m.
to 5:00 p.m.  Whispering Pines Golf Club will provide three instructors as
well as clubs.  The Houston Parks and Recreation Department to recruit 25
HISD 5th graders who are not enrolled in the First Tee Program to participate
in the clinic.

AWARD CATEGORIES

"Caryakid" trophies will be awarded for the following winning foursomes:

First Place  Low Gross
Second Place  Low Gross
Third Place  Low Gross
High Gross
First Place  Low Net
Second Place   Low Net
Third Place  Low Net

Hole In One Prize (Hole #11)
2001 Lexus LS430 from Sterling McCall Lexus

Longest Drive for Male and Female (Hole #10)
$100 gift certificate from Memorial Park Golf Course

Closest to the Hole (Hole #7, Hole #15)
$100 gift certificate from Memorial Park Golf Course

MULLIGAN & RAFFLE PRIZES

$20 buys 2 mulligan (maximum of 2 per player) and 1 free raffle ticket
$20 buys 5 raffle tickets
$5 buys 1 raffle ticket

Please advise if you need golf clubs.  See you there!

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor for Greg Whalley


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000038420&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000038420
Request Create Date : 6/4/01 7:52:05 AM
Requested For       : gary.bryan@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US NatGas US Gas Financial
Resource Type       : Applications


I just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten you.  My usual source for
getting the ETA's is out, and I'm trying to track down someone else who can
send them to me...

	Travis McCullough
	09/05/2000 08:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yes, I need your help again ...

My buddy Edmund is out of the office for a while.  Can you tell me who else I
can contact to get a copy of EnronOnline's ETA for Mexico and Japan?

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


I believe it is the E-Next Generation LV Co Gen contract.  I believe the last
draft was around the beginning of April.  I can check for more specifics.

Kay

"Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com> on 04/19/2001 10:53:37 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>, <dale.ramussen@enron.com>

Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

Dear Kay and Dale,
 Peter Thompson is on vacation and has asked me to make the
attached changes (sent to Peter by Dale).  They are very
straight-forward and will only take a minute.  However, there are a
couple of contracts to which the changes could potentially apply, and
I'd like to make sure I've got the right one before I start making
changes.  Please let me know which contract needs to be changed, and
I'll take care of the rest.  Thank you, Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindo, Jacqueline E.
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Cobb, Chris
Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:23 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.; Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

Here's what we're hearing from our contractor.  Can you work them in,
Peter?
---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
06:30 PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Don Hammond
 pic10004.pcx) 04/12/2001 10:32 AM

To:   Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  FW: GE and ABB comments

I'm not sure the status of these agreements and the ability or
appropriateness to incorporate changes. But, here's he input for
consideration.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Hammond/PDX/ECT on 04/12/2001
10:37
AM ---------------------------

  (Embedded        Enron Capital & Trade Resources
  image moved      Corp.
  to file:
  pic16337.pcx     From:  "Phillips, Bill"
  )                <BPhillips@moderncontinental.com>
                   04/11/2001 04:50 PM

To:   "'don.hammond@enron.com'" <don.hammond@enron.com>
cc:   "Sisson, Bob" <BSisson@moderncontinental.com>
Subject:  FW: GE and ABB comments

Please consider the attached comments in your final
negotiations with GE and ABB. Hopefully this format
is more user friendly than the whole pile. These are
Lauren/DHEC understanding of requirements to conform
with EPC contract.  Bill Phillips

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Garner [mailto:pgarner@laurenec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:41 PM
To: Phillips, Bill
Cc: "Jack Cress"; "Kevin Hargis"; "Mike Shelton"; "Roy Milne"
Subject: GE and ABB comments

Bill,

In reviewing these documents we find that these changes were not
incorporated.  Could you please make certain they are included.

Thanks

Paul

(See attached file: ABB B-1Comments.doc)
(See attached file: GE contract comments.doc)

 - pic10004.pcx
 - pic16337.pcx
 - ABB B-1Comments.doc
 - GE contract comments.doc


Here is a revised list of 228 riders.

Susan


Attached is Shelley Corman's response to Jeff Dasovich, based on
conversations with Drew and me.  Accordingly, I would advise you not to
participate in the conference call Jeff is setting up for tomorrow.

Questions -- give me a call.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
12:52 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
01/04/2000 12:50 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: The El Paso Controversy Continues

Jeff,

From the pipeline group's perspective, this transaction is a commercial
matter between El Paso and ENA.  Accordingly, the gas pipeline group does not
believe that it is appropriate to participate in the development of ENA's
response.

I do understand that the referenced article and certain of the protests make
factual allegations about Transwestern's available capacity to California.
Susan Scott or I can certainly provide corrected information from
Transwestern's available capacity postings.

Jeff Dasovich @ EES on 01/04/2000 11:23:33 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Julie A Gomez@ECT, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris H
Foster@ECT, Kevin Simmons@ECT, Dave Parquet@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Keene/HOU/EES@EES,
Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT, Kevin Hyatt@ECT, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: The El Paso Controversy Continues

i would like to set up a conference call for tomorrow, jan. 5 at 3:30 CST to
discuss the ena/el paso deal.  please let me know if 1) you would like to be
on the call, and 2) you are available at that time.  thanks, jeff

Jeff Dasovich on 01/02/2000 07:19:57 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Julie A Gomez@ECT, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris H
Foster@ECT, Kevin Simmons@ECT, Dave Parquet@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Keene/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: The El Paso Controversy Continues

please read be story from trade press below.  i have not included et&s folks
on this note because i'm uncertain regarding the rules with respect to
communication among business units in these sorts of matters.  if it's
acceptable to include tw in the notes and in conversations, that would be my
preference.  rick, is it your view that tw can or cannot be included?

i believe i passed along word of the ena/el paso deal when it hit the press
week before last.  the press reported both the amount of capacity and the
price for which ena bought it from el paso.  to summarize:  ena purchased
1.25 bcf per day for one year starting jan 1, 2000.  ena paid $38 million,
which gives an average price of $.0831 per mmbtu.  (by contrast, williams
bought about 0.1 bcf/day at an average rate of $.207.)   el paso released
this information via a a press release without any prior approval from ena.
julie, please don't hesitate to fill any holes or (unintended) innaccuracies.

the situation is complicated by the fact that california is currently in the
midst of intense negotiations over restructuring the state's gas industry.
the negotiations have been going on for about 8 months and have been very
contentious.  socal has teamed with indicated producers, california
manufacturers association, and muni generators from southern california to
push a very "go slow" approach that is (surprise) quite friendly to larger
users.  enron is teamed with western hub storage, wild goose storage,
calpine, southern california edison, green mountain power, the city of
vernon, and spurr/remac (provides services to california's k-12 school
system) under an alliance called "california alliance for competition"
(snappy, i know).  the cac proposal is pushing, among other things, a single,
state-wide market for transport, storage and balancing, including tradeable
rights in a secondary market.

indicated producers has been aggressive and hostile toward marketers--as has
cma--throughout the negotiations.  ip's bile has not been reserved solely for
enron, however.  one outcome of the negotiations has been the suit ip
launched against el paso at ferc regarding el paso's nom process.  (i believe
ena filed in support of the suit.)  el paso is losing that one and will
likely change its nom process sooner rather than later.

i think it's important to have a quick call to develop a clear and consistent
message on the ena deal and coordinate what we're saying about that deal with
the other gas issues on the table.  i'm assuming that if there's anything we
can do to keep harvey morris (and california) from mucking up the deal, the
better.  i know harvey well.  i'm not sure, given his quotes, there's much
"educating" to be done, but may make sense to meet with him, nonetheless.
more important, indicated producers is the real--and biggest--problem.

let me know if you folks think there'd be value in briefly discussing the
issue.

best,
jeff

Kevin Hyatt@ENRON
12/30/99 10:51 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: The El Paso Controversy Continues

CPUC attorney Harvey Morris obviously has NO CLUE on how the transportation
business works.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 12/30/99 12:49
PM ---------------------------
ET & S Business Intelligence
From: Lorna Brennan on 12/30/99 09:18 AM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lou
Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Sova/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob Wilson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hartfield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Fritch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brenda Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Harvey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Joyce/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Therese Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon
Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Perry/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken
Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joan Schwieger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank Semin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Neal
Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chuck Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ray Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: The El Paso Controversy Continues

Enron-El Paso Deal Could Mute Competition to CA

     Fearing an end to pipeline competition in California, the state's
regulators and Indicated
     Shippers have called on FERC to summarily reject the three
transportation agreements by
     which Enron North America Corp. has contracted for 1.25 Bcf/d of
unsubscribed firm
     capacity on El Paso Natural Gas.

     Approval of these agreements would give Enron Corp., parent of
Transwestern Pipeline
     and Enron North America, control over all the available transportation
capacity to the
     southern California border, warned Harvey Morris, principal attorney for
the California
     Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which plans to submit its protest
today. Between
     the two pipelines, he estimated Enron will control 2.34 Bcf/d of firm
capacity from the
     San Juan and Permian basins to California.

     For Morris, Enron North America's contracting of the El Paso capacity
represents a
     worse threat to the pipeline's other shippers than Dynegy Marketing and
Trade, who has
     held the capacity for past two years and whose contract expires Dec. 31.
"At least then
     there was some Transwestern competition to the Dynegy situation. Now
it's Enron, the
     owner of Transwestern, who's stepping into Dynegy's shoes."

     But "what's even worse," he told NGI, is the revenue-sharing provision
in the contracts. It
     stipulates that "after Enron makes $35 million off of these contracts,
it has to share the
     proceeds with El Paso for 25% of anything beyond $35 million. So
effectively, Enron and
     El Paso have become partners in how high they can jack up the
transportation rate
     differential between the California border and the Southwest producing
basins."

     The two pipeline companies "that have for decades competed with each
other in carrying
     Southwest supplies to California are now partners. We think that's
anticompetitive, and
     there's no way FERC should approve it," Morris said. He recalled the
basis differential
     between the San Juan Basin spot price and the California border shot up
by 17% during
     1998, the first year during which Dynegy controlled the El Paso capacity
into California.
     This situation could worsen under Enron, he believes.

     "At first blush the El Paso-Enron contracts [do] not appear to contain
the same
     anticompetitive features of the El Paso-Dynegy contracts," Indicated
Shippers noted, but
     a "closer review and analysis" reveals the anticompetitive effects of
the revenue-sharing
     provision (RSP) in El Paso-Enron contracts "are not only similar" to
those of the hotly
     contested reservation-reduction mechanism (RRM) in the El Paso-Dynegy
case, "but are
     increased......due to the fact that the contracts are with a marketing
affiliate of El Paso's
     primary interstate pipeline competitor," Transwestern.

     Both the RRM and RSP "operate to provide a disincentive for El Paso and
its competitors
     to compete against each other, or to take any other action that will act
to drive down the
     basis differential that defines the market value of the capacity,"
Indicated Shippers told
     FERC in a protest filed on Wednesday [RP97-287-041]. The group includes
producers
     Amoco Production, Burlington Resources Oil and Gas, Marathon Oil, and
Phillips
     Petroleum, and two marketers - Amoco Energy Trading and Phillips Gas
Marketing.

     FERC "should reject the tariff filing immediately. The Commission erred
in allowing the
     El Paso-Dynegy contracts to remain intact for their two-year term after
finding that the
     contracts were anticompetitive. This issue is pending in the [D.C. Court
of Appeals].
     That same error should not be repeated here," the producers and
marketers said.

     The CPUC's attempt to block the Enron-El Paso contracts at the outset is
a little bit
     unusual for the agency, Morris said, but it learned its lesson following
Dynegy. "When the
     Dynegy situation first hit, we asked for FERC to investigate the matter.
We thought
     FERC did a very inadequate job then.....This time around we're asking
for FERC to
     summarily reject it. It's hard for an agency like ours to take such a
strong stand right at
     the beginning, but we've learned too much from two years of suffering
under the Dynegy
     situation. And this is even worse."

     In the event the Commission should reject California's request, the CPUC
has asked that
     an "anti-hoarding condition" be included in the contracts, which would
require Enron to
     release unused capacity into the short-term market at a price higher
than what it's paying
     El Paso for the capacity. "They must make a little profit," Morris
noted. "We're confident
     Enron can't use the entire 1.2 Bcf/d of capacity.....so there's going to
be unused
     capacity."

     The agency also wants FERC to clarify that the primary delivery point
for the Block II
     portion of the capacity (579MMcf/d) is PG&E-Topock in keeping with the
terms of the
     1996 settlement between El Paso and its customers. Morris said he agreed
fully with
     Amoco, Burlington Resources and Southern California Gas (SoCalGas),
which accused
     El Paso of violating the 1996 agreement by allowing Dynegy to use
SoCalGas-Topock as
     a primary delivery point for the Block II capacity last summer. They
contend the alleged
     violation is included in the Enron contracts.

     He also noted the CPUC will challenge the ability of Enron to call back
Block II capacity
     after it already had been recalled by El Paso shippers to serve Pacific
Gas and Electric
     (PG&E) customers in northern California. Last July, FERC granted Dynegy
the right to
     do this under its contracts with El Paso. But Morris contends the
decision violates the
     1996 settlement under which PG&E paid $54 million to preserve the right
of the pipeline's
     shippers to recall the Block II capacity to serve end-users in its
service territory.

     The CPUC also intends to challenge the Commission's decision that would
enable Enron
     to "just sit on the capacity," thereby withholding idle Block II
capacity from the market.
     Indicated Shippers also contend the Enron contracts violate the Block II
capacity
     provisions of the 1996 rate case, as well as "exacerbate" the primary
firm delivery point
     capacity-allocation issues that are pending before FERC now.

     The CPUC accused El Paso of "deliberately" filing the Enron contracts at
FERC just
     before the holidays to avoid controversy. The pipeline "is trying to
sneak one of the most
     controversial things ever past FERC right before Christmas so that
protests would be
     minimized," said Morris. "They did this with the Dynegy contracts two
years ago. They
     have a pattern of filing right at the last minute, making it harder for
people to protest and
     harder for FERC to stop it from going into effect."

,Copyright 1999 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding
news report may not
be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without
prior written consent
of Intelligence Press, Inc.


calendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 07:35 AM -----

	Gina Taylor
	10/30/2000 03:39 PM

		 To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Amabile/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Kirk McDaniel/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathleen A Cook/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James C
Lewis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Ray
Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew S
Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Bazelides/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Scott Yeager@ees,
Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cedric Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Costello/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ava Syon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yorleni
Mendez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edineth R Santos/SA/Enron@Enron, Grisela
Escamilla/NA/Enron@Enron, Debbie Nowak/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maxine E
Levingston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Theresa McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Metoyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy
Barrows/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carolyn
Vigne/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathy
Gibbins/HOU/EES@EES, Dortha Gray/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Leslie D
Dever/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Alma
Martinez/OTS/Enron@ENRON, terri_bachand@enron.net, Karina
Prizont/NA/Enron@Enron, Elisabeth Edwards/FRA/ECT@ECT, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Rescheduled Nov. Vision and Values Meeting

In response to an anticipated low participation rate in the Nov. 15 Vision
and Values meeting, we are rescheduling the Vision and Values meeting to
Tuesday, Nov. 14, from 2-3:30 in eb8c1.

Please plan to attend this rescheduled meeting.  Please let me know if you
are unavailable for the meeting.

Thanks!

Gina
x37681


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Quick, Joan
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Quick, Joan
Subject:	juniper ownership

owned 75% by jedi, 25% by enron


Take care,

ED


American Title
5120 Woodway #7029    77056
Machelle Halstedt


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
10/23/2000 04:42 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Bob,

Please see the attached file estimating wellhead production for the month of
November.  Please be advised that this is a preliminary estimate as to this
date, we have received no noms for November and there may be revisions from
the traders.  I will update you with any revisions as they occur.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 10/10/2000 04:19:13 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Waco visit

Great.  Why don't you plan on getting here by 3:00 p.m. (or sooner).  We'll
do a little seminar at 4 for the faculty (perhaps outlining your thoughts
on the paper we are preparing).  We'll do the class 6-7:30 or so (I'll get
you to your hotel for I teach until 10 pm).  Then we'll put in time Tue
working on the paper.

John

At 03:22 PM 10/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>Per our discussion, Nov 13 is fine.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 10/09/2000 05:27:30 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Waco visit
>
>
>Vince,
>
>I have penciled you in for Nov 13th for my class.  Does this work for you?
>This is a Monday and I would suggest you come up Monday afternoon, you can
>give a brief talk to our department late in the afternoon, and then you can
>talk to my Ex MBAs at 6 p.m. for an hour or so.  I'll get you to the hotel
>for the evening and we can work on the paper Tuesday morning.  I recommend
>this Mon noon through Tue noon arrangement since I will be out of town the
>weekend before the 13th.  If this needs reshuffling let me know.  We'll
>make it work.
>
>I look forward to talking with you later this week along with Mark Palmer.
>
>John
>
>
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Scott received the delivery.  I've forwarded the email to him and asked about a 5pm meeting w/you and Dan.  Will let you know as soon as I do.  Where are you by the way?


IEP handed this out to the Legislature and the capitol press corps today'

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043007.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   6.40 / Final:   6.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Kim and I discussed -- she wants guidance from legal.  The process Southern
is advocating will not save her any time or paper, but she's not going to
stand in front of a moving train if this is what Enron wants to do and if
legal OKs it.  Then Sara Shackleton was working w/ the financial confirm desk
(can't recall his name) and I have not been able to speak w/ Sara -- just
voicemails so far.  I'd be happy for you to take this back if you'd like to
work on it as an infrastructure project.  Perhaps we could let Sara know w/
whom she should coordinate on the physical/legal support team and we can
resolve this for Kim.
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)

	Leslie Hansen
	03/07/2000 11:06

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Southern Company confirms

Janice:

Did you ever discuss the Southern Company confirms with Kim Theriot?  Let's
touch base on Wednesday to discuss.  (I have a 9-10 am meeting and a doctor's
appt at 3 pm, but I'm available any time in between).

Hope you had a great long weekend!

Leslie


Your fax of the signed NDA did not come through all the way, I only got part
of the first page.  Could you please refax back the whole document so I can
get it signed by Enron.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 05:09 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	02/22/2001 04:14 PM

		 To: vnguyen@greenash.com
		 cc: Paul Finken/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: NDA - GreenAsh Corporation

At the request of Paul Finken, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will
then have it executed by an officer of Enron.  If you have any comments or
questions please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399, or Mark
Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897.  We look forward to hearing
from you.


Mike,

I have attached 2 files below.  The file entitled "Continental Power
Assessment.doc" is the assessment that I had during my eight week stay in
London.  The file has 2 pages, the first being a summary and the second is
more detailed.  I may not have given you a copy as you were on vacation
during my last week.  I did have lunch with Fernley at which time I
communicated these concerns and future projects.  Also, I met with James New,
Paul Mead, and Gregor Baumerich on an individual basis and delivered the same
document.  Lastly, I left a copy for Joe Gold as he was out of the office.

After reading your e-mail to Sally, I composed the second file entitled
"Continental Power Summary.doc."  This file is a summarized, one-page list of
issues with which you, Joe, and I are concerned (as well as Sally and Fernley
of course).  The arrows below each section points out the potential risk that
we are really talking about.

I am on vacation Friday, June 22 and the week of June 26.  Sally mentioned
that you are in Houston July 5 - 7.  Let's meet to further discuss these
issues and so that I may inform you about what continued work is in progress
for Continental Power.

Thanks,

Todd


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 03:03
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           03/27/2001 12:32 PM

To: ragan.bond@bhlp.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: Witch's Brew

  Young King Arthur was ambushed and imprisoned by the monarch of a
   neighboring kingdom.  The monarch could have killed him, but was moved
by
   Arthur's youthful happiness.
   So he offered him freedom, as long as he could answer a very difficult
   question.  Arthur would have a year to figure out the answer;  if, after
a
   year, he still had no  answer, he would be killed.
   The question was: "What do women really want?"  Such a question would
   perplex even the most knowledgeable man, and, to young Arthur, it seemed
an
   impossible query.  Since it was better than death, however, he accepted
the
   monarchs proposition to have an answer by year's end.
   He returned to his kingdom and began to poll everybody: the princess,
the
   prostitutes, the priests, the wise men, the court jester.  In all, he
spoke
   with everyone, but no one could give him a satisfactory answer. What
most
   people did tell him, was to consult the old witch, as only she would
know
   the answer. The price would be high, since the witch was famous
throughout
   the kingdom for the exorbitant prices she charged.
   The last day of the year arrived and Arthur had no alternative but to
talk
   to the witch. She agreed to answer his question, but he'd have to accept
her
   price first:  The old witch wanted to marry Gawain, the most noble of
the
   Knights of the Round Table and Arthur's closest friend!
   Young Arthur was horrified: she was hunchbacked and awfully hideous, had
   only one tooth, smelled like sewage water, often made obscene noises. He
had
   never run across such a repugnant creature.  He refused to force his
friend
   to marry her and have to endure such a burden.
   Gawain, upon learning of the proposal, spoke with Arthur.  He told him
that
   nothing was too big of a sacrifice compared to Arthur's life and the
   preservation of the Round  Table.  Hence, their wedding was
   proclaimed, and the witch  answered Arthur's question:  "What a woman
really
   wants is to be able to be in charge of her own life."
   Everyone instantly knew that the witch had uttered a great truth and
that
   Arthur's life would be spared.  And so it went.
   The neighboring monarch spared Arthur's life and granted him total
freedom.
 What a wedding Gawain and the witch had! Arthur was torn between relief
and
   anguish.  Gawain was proper as always, gentle and courteous. The old
witch
   put her worst manners on display.  She ate with her hands, belched and
passed
   gas, and made everyone uncomfortable as ever.
   The wedding night approached:  Gawain, steeling himself for a horrific
   night, entered the bedroom.  What a sight awaited!  The most beautiful
woman
   he'd ever seen lay before him!  Gawain was astounded and asked what had
   happened.  The beauty replied that since he  had been so kind to her
(when
   she was a witch), half the time she would  be her horrible, deformed
self,and
   the other half, she would be her beautiful maiden self.  Which would he
want
   her to be during the day and which during the night?
   What a cruel question!  Gawain began to think of his predicament:
   during the day a beautiful woman to show off to  his friends, but at
night,
   in the privacy of his home, an old spooky witch?  Or would he prefer
having
   by day  a hideous witch, but by night a beautiful  woman
   to enjoy many intimate  moments?

 What would you do?

   What Gawain chose follows below, but don't read  until you've made your
own
   choice.

   The Answer: * *

   Noble Gawain replied that he would let her choose for herself.

   Upon hearing this, she announced that she would  be beautiful all the
time,
   because he had respected her and had let her be in charge of her own
life.
   What is the moral of this story?

   The moral is that it doesn't matter if your woman is pretty or ugly,
smart or
   dumb. Underneath it all, she's still a witch.


Lets talk today, susan.  I need to satisfy myself that this is really one of
those "shit happens" situations like everyone seems to believe, rather than a
situation where we may have a cause of action and some $$$ owed to us by
someone.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/01/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

Keith Petersen
12/01/2000 08:08 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup

The note below was a portion of Terry Galassini's Weekly Report.  I wasn't
sure if either of you have been a part of the test information.

**Gallup Compressor Station & Mainline Expansion
A field test was completed and initial results indicate a compressor
efficiency around 80 - 82% which is within Cooper's guarantee.  A not to
exceed cost of $3 Million was provided to Marketing for station modifications
to facilitate an incremental mainline (West of Thoreau) firm capacity of 10
MMcf/d.    Additional work by E&C to fine tune the not to exceed estimate is
targeted for completion by December 8th.  The mainline expansion potential is
directly related to Gallup since the discharge pressure must be increased to
970 psig to achieve an additional 10 MMcf/d on the mainline.  The San Juan
Lateral firm capacity would remain at 850 MMcf/d.


woo hoo!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 07:41 AM
---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
12/05/2000 07:30 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: (00-412) Early Exchange Closing for 12/22 and 12/29/2000

 I just received this from one of the floor brokers and thought everyone
would like to here the good news.  Fridays, Dec. 22 & 29, the Exchange will
close at 12 Noon CST.

Errol
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000
07:20 AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 12/04/2000 09:20:56 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:

Subject: (00-412) Early Exchange Closing for 12/22 and 12/29/2000

Notice # 00-412
December 4, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX/COMEX MEMBERS
ALL NYMEX/COMEX MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX/COMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX/COMEX OPERATION MANAGERS

FROM: Stu Smith, Senior Vice President, Operations

RE: Exchange Early Closing Schedule for December 22, 2000 and December 29,
2000

Please be advised that the Exchange will close markets earlier on Friday,
December 22 and Friday, December 29, 2000, the days preceding Christmas Day
and New Years Day respectively.  The following early contract closing
schedule will be implemented:

NYMEX DIVISION

Commodity and Closing Range for December 22, 2000

Palladium Futures: 11:58 a.m. - 12:00 noon

Platinum Futures and Options: 12:08 p.m. - 12:10 p.m.

Heating Oil Futures and Options: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Unleaded Gasoline Futures and Options: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Propane Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Crude Oil Futures and Options: 12:58p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures and Options: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Permian Pool Natural Gas Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Alberta Natural Gas Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Gulf Coast Gasoline Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Commodity and Closing Range for December 29, 2000

Palladium Futures: 11:58 a.m. - 12:00 noon

Platinum Futures and Options: 12:08 p.m. - 12:10 p.m.

Heating Oil Futures and Options: *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Unleaded Gasoline Futures and Options: *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Propane Futures: *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Crude Oil Futures and Options: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures and Options: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Permian Pool Natural Gas Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Alberta Natural Gas Futures: 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

Gulf Coast Gasoline Futures: *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.

COMEX DIVISION

Commodity and Closing Range for December 22, 2000

Aluminum Futures and Options: 11:59 a.m. - 12:00 noon
Copper Futures and Options: 12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m.
Silver Futures and Options: 12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m.
Gold Futures and Options: 12:09 p.m. - 12:10 p.m.
The Eurotop 100 & 300 contracts will conduct normal trading hours.

Commodity and Closing Range for December 29, 2000

Aluminum Futures and Options: 11:59 a.m. - 12:00 noon
Copper Futures and Options: 12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m.
Silver Futures and Options: 12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m.
Gold Futures and Options: 12:09 p.m. - 12:10 p.m.
The Eurotop 100 & 300 contracts will conduct normal trading hours.

The NYMEX Division Late Submissions Area is scheduled to close at 2:30 p.m.
and the NYMEX Division Trade Correction Area will close at 3:15 p.m., the
TMS trade allocation screens will be available until 4:30 p.m.  The COMEX
Division's OLTE System will be available for corrections until 2:30 p.m.
In the event that you require additional time to process work, or have
questions regarding early close procedures, please call Fred Tantao
299-2045, Rob Stasi 299-2067, George Henderson 299-2071, Les Faison
299-2070 (NYMEX Division) or David Sherman 299-2061, Michael Campanelli
299-2072 (COMEX Division).

* Last Trading Day Spot Month - Half Hour Closing Range (12:30 pm ? 1:00
pm)
* All Electricity Future and Option contracts traded on NYMEX Access will
close at 1:00 p.m.

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com


Power Marketers

QSE Services - Full Service

Contract Length		No Term	1 Year	3 Year
MINIMUM ANNUAL FEE		$120,000 	$108,000 	$102,000

		$/MWh	$/MWh	$/MWh
Energy Scheduling (includes reserve products)		0.08	0.065	0.055
Settlement		0.08	0.065	0.055

MAXIMUM ANNUAL FEE		No limit	$400,000 	$380,000

Thane indicated that we could possibly do a 1 or 2 month contract, thus avoiding "LD's" for a NO TERM contract..  He also indicated that the Minimum Annual Fee is really monthly--thus under the No Term scenario, with a 60-day cancellation:  if we were to terminate & begin using our own QSE prior to the 60 day cancellation we'd only be liable for the $20K in "Liquidated Damages"...$10K monthly minimum * 2 months.  The point is, if we only use 2 months we're not liable for $100K for unused months because of the "MINIMUM ANNUAL FEE OF $120K."

We would download APX software to upload/download our daily schedules using APX as our QSE. (no email)

There is also another option where we could be our own QSE but use the APX software to schedule for a lesser fee (which Thane is checking into).  There is a fee for the software per workstation.


Carlos,  Looks fine to me.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 06:04 PM -----

	Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	11/07/2000 05:40 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Prod Description

Gerald,
Thanks for the GTC, attached is the Prod Description please review &
distribute if you approve. Please let me know if you have any
questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705


Mark Haedicke will hold a floor meeting for EWS Legal in Houston this afternoon, Monday, November 12, at 2:00 p.m.  The location will be outside of conference room EB3824.  Please plan to attend.

Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
on behalf of Mark E. Haedicke
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


I think that we need to respond as you suggest except could we ask that FERC
request that they modify the filing rather than dismiss it so that we get
some of the changes we need.

	Mary Hain
	11/27/2000 01:21 PM

		 To: Richard Sanders, gfergus@brobeck.com, mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, carrrn@bracepatt.com, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Richard Shapiro, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Joe
Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides,
Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CPUC protest at FERC re ISO confidentiality

The CPUC has protested the ISO's recent replacement of Volume Nos. I and II
of its tariff.  The ISO's tariff filing does not propose changes to any
substantive provision and is intended to be an uncontroversial filing to
comply with the designation and formatting requirements of FERC's Order 614.
Nevertheless, the CPUC:

Asks FERC to reject and modify the confidentiality and disclosure provisions
of the tariff such that they do not apply to requests for information from
California state agencies with statutory responsibilities related to
regulation or oversight of the electric industry.  CPUC asks the provisions
be modified to require the ISO to respond to such requests in the same manner
as it responds to data requests from FERC itself.
Points out that the ISO has used this provision to refuse to provide
responses to the CPUC's subpoena including bid data.
Also asserts that the Western System Coordinating Council's (WSCC) extra high
voltage (EHV) data is available in real time to all WSCC members, including
market participants.

I was wondering if others agree we should file an answer to the CPUC's
answer, stating the following.

The ISO should make all market information available to all market
participants as we laid out in our comments on the FERC's November 1 order.
Not all market participants get EHV data - since [date?] the ISO has refused
to provide this information to the WSCC unless the WSCC keeps this
information confidential, due to its tariff's confidentiality provisions.
Accordingly the ISO's data is now only being provided to those market
participants with control areas. However, we have no way of knowing, and
therefore assume that utilities, munis, and Federal Power Marketing
Administrations with control areas are providing this information to their
merchant function.  This access to market information is unduly
discriminatory.  To rectify this undue discrimination, the FERC should delete
the confidentiality provision altogether.
The CPUC's filing is procedurally defective in that the ISO did not change
the confidentiality provision of its tariff so the CPUC's filing should have
been in a complaint in which it would have the burden of proof.  Therefore,
the FERC should dismiss the CPUC's filing.


Just a 'heads up' - there is now no doubt that there will need to be some
major revisions to the index language.  I am meeting with some of the folks
from the confirm desks this afternoon to get them started on a further
review.  Can you please arrange to have the following people given access to
the Product Manager:

Jeff Sorenson
Dale Neuner
Bob Bowen
Lynn Shivers
Kevin Sweeney


I think that's enough stuff for now.


Here's the long awaited form of option for your review and comment.

I'm sending it to Rose, Lisa and Catherine for their review also.

Thanks,

Kay


Greetings:

John, I would like to promote Hodge to VP this time around.  I know our
system has changed to get that done, but I wanted to get your support on
this.  I believe Jeff has done a good job  and added significant value for a
long time and has earned it.  Give me your thoughts.

Mark


Lousie,

I would be grateful if you could review the transaction below, which will require your approval.   As outlined below the client 'Borealis'  wishes to change the terms of the contract given our current situation.  RAC is comfortable with the changes, as it will result in a significant saving in storage costs and allow the LPG trader to flatten his book. Further, whilst there maybe the potential of MTM movement between the $180 purchase price from Borealis and the subsequent sale (index related price) back to the counterpart, this will be netted out.  RAC has significant risk appetite for this counterpart, which is a sound credit, rated E5.  The only issue is whether Houston has sufficient resources or are willing to pay the storage costs early, which could range between $1,200,000-?1,400,000.  If this is feasible I will recommend that we negotiate a discount of $15 on storage costs (saving $600,000) as opposed to $10.

Kind rgds,

Nish

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Petersen, Bo
Sent:	27 November 2001 17:45
To:	Patel, Nish
Subject:	London - LPG Book

Enron put 40,000 MT of Propane in storage under a term agreement (contract QA 8318)  in a facility
in Sweden,  managed and owned by a company called Borealis.  Enron, under the contract, agreed
to pay $45 per MT for the right to utilize the storage.
Due to Swedish law,  Enron can/could not have title to the product in Sweden and Borealis paid Enron,
under a pre-agreed price formula,  $186 per M/T.   Upon Enron's sale of the product and subsequent
lifting a payment of the $186 + $45 (storage fee) would become due to Borealis.  The likely timeframe
for selling the product would be Jan. 2002 as that is the highest OTC swap price mkt which in turn
would mean payment to Borealis would be due on 30 days past B/L. ie early Feb.

Borealis are very concerned about Enron's ability to meet it's payment obligation and has suggested
a transaction that in several ways would suit the LPG book.

Pls let me know if you need further information.

Bo Petersen

1.	An upfront payment (this week)  of the storage payment with a reduction of
$10-$15 dollars for the storage fee.  $400,000-$600,000 savings

2.	Borealis would purchase the Product in tank at an indexed related price
which would fit the London LPG book very well

3.	The contractual obligations to lift the storage tons would be further complicated
by the fact that the one physical trader most likely will not be here much longer.

Pls let me know if you need further information.

Bo Petersen


don't know what doing for new years (mentioned n.o. to z but not sure).
didn't return phone call because i was in nyc and forgot when i got home.  i
don't know anything about directories talk to my brother.  i don't know what
the fuck.

"Steve Nadalin" <s.nadalin@thehiringspot.com> on 12/08/2000 04:28:15 PM
Please respond to <s.nadalin@thehiringspot.com>
To: "Martin Cuilla (E-mail)" <mcuilla@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: new years

what the fuck are you doing for new years? why the fuck didn't you return my
voice-mail? where in the fuck are those directories? what the fuck, man?


Alison:

I think the energy panel at the AGM on March 17, 2000 in Amsterdam should
discuss (i) development of energy trading on the continent, (ii) energy
documentation issues and (iii) regulatory barriers to energy trading.  This
is a great time to do a panel on energy trading in Europe!  I will copy Paul
and Justin in London to get their ideas on both topics and panel members.
Perhaps we can have a conference call next week.

Mark


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010917.txt


Charlene,

Thank you for the invitiation, however, I wanted to let you know that John is
currently scheduled to be out of the country on January 11.  I have added it
to his schedule incase his plans change.

Kim

	From:  Charlene Jackson                           01/03/2001 10:08 AM

Sent by: Cheryl Kuehl
To:
cc: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa
Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl
Kuehl/Corp/Enron@ENRON (bcc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron)

Subject: Associate and Analyst Programs New Year's Kickoff Reception


check out the one about "dad's new wife.."
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------

Brian Hoskins
06/16/2000 09:51 AM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Fwd: FW: Children's Books You'll NEVER See!

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 10:51
AM ---------------------------

"Brian Hoskins" <bthoskins@hotmail.com> on 06/16/2000 10:37:01 AM
To: abamontb@slu.edu, alicia_sallee@hotmail.com, allie_easton@yahoo.com,
amknoten@hotmail.com, b2marina@aol.com, mballases@hotmail.com,
bpjackson@mediaone.net, lechafin312@hotmail.com, chrish@fogartyklein.com,
walker.c.cunningham@vanderbilt.edu, danielles@jonesgranger.com,
ebass@enron.com, eljinsha@yahoo.com, zone@aristotle.net, hcampos@enron.com,
hoganlee@hotmail.com, bhuels01@bellarmine.edu, jzook@wfubmc.edu,
jhoskins@seidlercos.com, jburke@princeton.edu, jaholzer@bellsouth.net,
kselinger@houston.geoquest.slb.com, krisy_p@hotmail.com, l-walsh@nwu.edu,
lfjohn0@hotmail.com, leninej@hotmail.com, ecarraro@hotmail.com,
stephen.kempf@nortonhealthcare.org, christopherlui@hotmail.com,
maeve.hughes@mwk.com, brian.hoskins@enron.com,
mpotter@houston.geoquest.slb.com, mpstan0@pop.uky.edu,
caroline.j.nagel@vanderbilt.edu, texas_delight@hotmail.com, stupor@home.com,
credders@beerscc.com, roberto.martinez@enron.com, robin.moore@batesville.com,
roman14@hotmail.com, rooneya@epenergy.com, dsstew01@gwise.louisville.edu,
sailer100@hotmail.com, warreng76@hotmail.com, mylawyer@go.com,
kfwill01@gwise.louisville.edu
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Children's Books You'll NEVER See!

>From: Katrina Schott <katschott@usa.net>
>To: Alison Abernathy <alisonabernathy@usa.net>,  Lisa Cawley
><lisacawley@earthlink.net>,  Brian Hoskins <bthoskins@hotmail.com>,  Ellen
>Seabolt <eseabolt@mindspring.com>,  Judy Stricklin
><judy.g.stricklin@ac.com>
>Subject: FW: Children's Books You'll NEVER See!
>Date: 15 Jun 00 17:44:04 EDT
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [204.68.24.62] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBB1298FB002BD820F3ADCC44183EA0650; Thu Jun 15 14:43:32 2000
>Received: (qmail 17949 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2000 21:44:04 -0000
>Received: from 204.68.24.62 by aw162 for [139.76.64.4] via
>web-mailer(34PS1.1.04) on Thu Jun 15 21:44:04 GMT 2000
>From katschott@usa.net Thu Jun 15 14:47:38 2000
>Message-ID: <20000615214404.17948.qmail@aw162.netaddress.usa.net>
>X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34PS1.1.04)
>
>Speaking of books....I found this gem among my "humor archives"....
>
>John Mclin <JMCLIN@DIVERSITECH.com>
>05/06/99 08:13 PM GMT
>
>To:   Katrina E. Schott@Andersen Consulting
>cc:
>Subject:  FW: Children's Books You'll NEVER See!
>
>
> > >
> > >"You Were an Accident!"
> > >
> > >"Strangers Have the Best Candy"
> > >
> > >"The Little Sissy Who Snitched"
> > >
> > >"Some Kittens Can Fly!"
> > >
> > >"Getting More Chocolate on Your Face"
> > >
> > >"Where Would You Like to Be Buried?"
> > >
> > >"Kathy Was So Bad Her Mom Stopped Loving Her"
> > >
> > >"The Attention Deficit Disorder Association's Book of Wild Animals of
> > >North Amer... Hey!  Let's Go Ride Our Bikes!"
> > >
> > >"All Dogs Go to Hell!"
> > >
> > >"The Kids' Guide to Hitchhiking"
> > >
> > >"When Mommy and Daddy Don't Know the Answer They Say 'God Did It'"
> > >
> > >"Garfield Gets Feline Leukemia"
> > >
> > >"What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?"
> > >
> > >"Why Can't Mr. Fork and Ms. Electrical Outlet Be Friends?"
> > >
> > >"Bi-Curious George"
> > >
> > >"Daddy Drinks Because You Cry"
> > >
> > >"Mister Policeman Eats His Service Revolver"
> > >
> > >"You Are Different and That's Bad"
> > >
> > >"Dad's New Wife... Timothy"
> > >
> > >"Pop!  Goes The Hamster (and Other Great Microwave Games)"
> > >
> > >"Testing Homemade Parachutes With Nothing At All But Your Household
> > Pets"
> > >
> > >"The Hardy Boys, the Barbie Twins and the Vice Squad"
> > >
> > >"The Tickling Babysitter"
> > >
> > >"Babar Meets the Taxidermist"
> > >
> > >"Curious George and the High-Voltage Fence"
> > >
> > >"The Boy Who Died from Eating All His Vegetables"
> > >
> > >"Start a Real-Estate Empire With the Change From Your Mom's Purse"
> > >
> > >"The Pop-up Book of Human Anatomy"
> > >
> > >"Things Rich Kids Have, But You Never Will!"
> > >
> > >"The Care Bears Maul Some Campers and are Shot Dead"
> > >
> > >"How to Become The Dominant Military Power In Your Elementary School"
> > >
> > >"Controlling the playground: Respect through Fear"
> >
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


How is it going?  Haven't talked to you in awhile.  It has been pretty busy
around here.  Trying to sell all these nasty assets.  I am leaving for your
homeland, Denver to experience the Rocky Mountain high for myself.  Just what
the hell was John Denver singing about anyway?  Let me know what's going on.