---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 03:33 PM
---------------------------

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 02/02/2000 03:02:07 PM
To: Daphneco64@aol.com
cc: jasnbass@swbell.net, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fw: Winning the cultural war

----- Original Message -----
From: Frank Marsters
To: Adams, George
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 12:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Winning the cultural war

----- Original Message -----
From: Ted & Carla
To: Mike Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 10:45 PM
Subject: Winning the cultural war

Mike, here is the speach by Charlton Heston that I was telling you about.
Subject:
        Winning the Cultural War by Charlton Heston
   Date:
        Tue, 16 Mar 1999 20:47:56 -0600
   From:
        "Koenig's International News" <bill@watch.org>
     To:
        watch-news@watch.org

Note from Bill Koenig:

Below is an excellent message given by Charlton Heston at Harvard.
Rush Limbaugh today said he has received 9000 e-mail requests for a
copy.

It is entitled 'Winning the Cultural War' and was given at the
Harvard Law School Forum, February 16, 1999.

************

I remember my son when he was 5, explaining to his kindergarten
class what his father did for a living. "My Daddy," he said,
"pretends to be people." There have been quite a few of them.
Prophets from the Old and New Testaments, a couple of
Christian saints, generals of various nationalities and different
centuries, several kings, three American presidents, a French
cardinal and two geniuses, including Michelangelo. If you want the
ceiling re-painted I'll do my best. There always seem to be a lot
of different fellows up here. I'm never sure which one of them gets
to talk. Right now, I guess I'm the guy.

As I pondered our visit tonight it struck me: If my creator gave me
the gift to connect you with the hearts and minds of those
great men, then I want to use that same gift now to re-connect you
with your own sense of liberty ... your own freedom of
thought ... your own compass for what is right. Dedicating the
memorial at Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln said of America, "We are
now engaged in a great Civil War, testing whether this nation or
any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long
endure." Those words are true again. I believe that we are again
engaged in a great civil war, a cultural war that's about to
hijack your birthright to think and say what resides in your heart.
I fear you no longer trust the pulsing lifeblood of liberty inside
you ... the stuff that made this country rise from wilderness into
the miracle that it is.

Let me back up. About a year ago I became president of the National
Rifle Association, which protects the right to keep and
bear arms. I ran for office, I was elected, and now I serve ... I
serve as a moving target for the media who've called me
everything from "ridiculous" and "duped" to a "brain-injured,
senile, crazy old man." I know ... I'm pretty old ... but I sure
thank the Lord ain't senile. As I have stood in the crosshairs of
those who target Second Amendment freedoms, I've realized that
firearms are not the only issue. No, it's much, much bigger than
that. I've come to understand that a cultural war is raging across
our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, certain acceptable
thoughts and speech are mandated.

For example, I marched for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 --
long before Hollywood found it fashionable. But when I told an
audience last year that white pride is just as valid as black pride
or red pride or anyone else's pride, they called me a racist.

I've worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all my life. But
when I told an audience that gay rights should extend no
further than your rights or my rights, I was called a homophobe.

I served in World War II against the Axis powers. But during a
speech, when I drew an analogy between singling out innocent Jews
and singling out innocent gun owners, I was called an anti-Semite.

Everyone I know knows I would never raise a closed fist against my
country. But when I asked an audience to oppose this
cultural persecution, I was compared to Timothy McVeigh.

>From Time magazine to friends and colleagues, they're essentially
saying, "Chuck, how dare you speak your mind. You are
using language not authorized for public consumption!"

But I am not afraid. If Americans believed in political
correctness, we'd still be King George's boys-subjects bound to the

British crown.

In his book, "The End of Sanity," Martin Gross writes that
"blatantly irrational behavior is rapidly being established as the
norm in almost every area of human endeavor. There seem to be new
customs, new rules, new anti-intellectual theories regularly
foisted on us from every direction.

Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something,
without a name is undermining the nation, turning the mind
mushy when it comes to separating truth from falsehood and right
from wrong. And they don't like it."

Let me read a few examples. At Antioch college in Ohio, young men
seeking intimacy with a coed must get verbal permission at each
step of the process from kissing to petting to final copulation ...
all clearly spelled out in a printed college directive. In New
Jersey, despite the death of several patients nationwide who had
been infected by dentists who had concealed their AIDS --- the
state commissioner announced that health providers who are
HIV-positive need not. .. need not ... tell their patients that
they are infected.

At William and Mary, students tried to change the name of the
school team "The Tribe" because it was supposedly insulting
to local Indians, only to learn that authentic Virginia chiefs
truly like the name.

In San Francisco, city fathers passed an ordinance protecting the
rights of transvestites to cross-dress on the job, and for
transsexuals to have separate toilet facilities while undergoing
sex change surgery.

In New York City, kids who don't speak a word of Spanish have been
placed in bilingual classes to learn their three R's in
Spanish solely because their last names sound Hispanic. At the
University of Pennsylvania, in a state where thousands died
at Gettysburg opposing slavery, the president of that college
officially set up segregated dormitory space for black students.
Yeah, I know ... that's out of bounds now. Dr. King said "Negroes."
Jimmy Baldwin and most of us on the March said "black." But it's a
no-no now.

For me, hyphenated identities are awkward ... particularly
"Native-American." I'm a Native American, for God's sake. I also
happen to be a blood-initiated brother of the Miniconjou Sioux. On
my wife's side, my grandson is a 13th-generation Native American
... with a capital letter on "American." Finally, just last month
... David Howard, head of the Washington D.C. Office of Public
Advocate, used the word "niggardly" while talking to colleagues
about budgetary matters. Of course, 'niggardly' means stingy or
scanty. But within days Howard was forced to publicly apologize and
resign.

As columnist Tony Snow wrote: "David Howard got fired because some
people in public employ were morons who (a) didn't know the meaning
of 'niggardly,' (b) didn't know how to use a dictionary to discover
the meaning, and ,actually demanded that he apologize for their
ignorance." What does all of this mean? It means that telling us
what to think has evolved into telling us what to say, so telling
us what to do can't be far behind.

Before you claim to be a champion of free thought, tell me: Why did
political correctness originate on America's campuses?
And why do you continue to tolerate it? Why do you, who're supposed
to debate ideas, surrender to their suppression?

Let's be honest. Who here thinks your professors can say what they
really believe? It scares me to death, and should scare
you too, that the superstition of political correctness rules the
halls of reason.

You are the best and the brightest. You, here in the fertile cradle
of American academia, here in the castle of learning on the
Charles River, you are the cream. But I submit that you, and your
counterparts across the land, are the most socially
conformed and politically silenced generation since Concord Bridge.

And as long as you validate that ... and abide it ... you are-by
your grandfathers' standards-cowards.

Here's another example. Right now at more than one major
university, Second Amendment scholars and researchers are
being told to shut up about their findings or they'll lose their
jobs. Why? Because their research findings would undermine
big-city mayor's pending lawsuits that seek to extort hundreds of
millions of dollars from firearm manufacturers.

I don't care what you think about guns. But if you are not shocked
at that, I am shocked at you. Who will guard the raw
material of unfettered ideas, if not you? Who will defend the core
value of academia, if you supposed soldiers of free thought
and expression lay down your arms and plead, "Don't shoot me." If
you talk about race, it does not make you a racist. If you
see distinctions between the genders, it does not make you a
sexist. If you think critically about a denomination, it does not
make you anti-religion. If you accept but don't celebrate
homosexuality, it does not make you a homophobe.

Don't let America's universities continue to serve as incubators
for this rampant epidemic of new McCarthyism. But what can you do?
How can anyone prevail against such pervasive social subjugation?

The answer's been here all along. I learned it 36 years ago, on the
steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C.,
standing with Dr. Martin Luther King and two hundred thousand
people. You simply ... disobey. Peaceably, yes. Respectfully, of
course. Nonviolently, absolutely. But when told how to think or
what to say or how to behave, we don't. We disobey social protocol
that stifles and stigmatizes personal freedom.

I learned the awesome power of disobedience from Dr. King ... who
learned it from Gandhi, and Thoreau and Jesus and every other great
man who led those in the right against those with the might.

Disobedience is in our DNA. We feel innate kinship with that
Disobedient spirit that tossed tea into Boston Harbor, that sent
Thoreau to jail, that refused to sit in the back of the bus, that
protested a war in Vietnam.

In that same spirit, I am asking you to disavow cultural
correctness with massive disobedience of rogue authority, social
directives and onerous law that weaken personal freedom.

But be careful ... it hurts. Disobedience demands that you put
yourself at risk. Dr. King stood on lots of balconies. You must
be willing to be humiliated ... to endure the modern-day equivalent
of the police dogs at Montgomery and the water Cannons at Selma.
You must be willing to experience discomfort. I'm not Complaining,
but my own decades of social activism have taken their toll on me.
Let me tell you a story.

A few years back I heard about a rapper named Ice-T who was selling
a CD called "Cop Killer" celebrating ambushing and
murdering police officers. It was being marketed by none other than
Time/Warner, the biggest entertainment conglomerate in the world.
Police across the country were outraged. Rightfully so-at least one
had been murdered. But Time/Warner was
stonewalling because the CD was a cash cow for them, and the media
were tiptoeing around it because the rapper was black.

I heard Time/Warner had a stockholders meeting scheduled in Beverly
Hills. I owned some shares at the time, so I decided to attend.
What I did there was against the advice of my family and
colleagues. I asked for the floor. To a hushed room of a
thousand average American stockholders, I simply read the full
lyrics of "Cop Killer"-every vicious, vulgar, instructional word.

"I GOT MY 12 GAUGE SAWED OFF
I GOT MY HEADLIGHTS TURNED OFF
I'm ABOUT TO BUST SOME SHOTS OFF
I'm ABOUT TO DUST SOME COPS OFF..."

It got worse, a lot worse. I won't read the rest of it to you. But
trust me, the room was a sea of shocked, frozen, blanched
faces. The Time/Warner executives squirmed in their chairs and
stared at their shoes. They hated me for that.

Then I delivered another volley of sick lyric brimming with racist
filth, where Ice-T fantasizes about sodomizing two 12-year old
nieces of Al and Tipper Gore. "SHE PUSHED HER BUTT AGAINST MY ...."

Well, I won't do to you here what I did to them. Let's just say I
left the room in echoing silence.

When I read the lyrics to the waiting press corps, one of them said
"We can't print that." "I know," I replied, "but Time/Warner _s
selling it."

Two months later, Time/Warner terminated Ice-T's contract. I'll
never be offered another film by Warners, or get a good review from
Time magazine. But disobedience means you must be willing to act,
not just talk.

When a mugger sues his elderly victim for defending herself ... jam
the switchboard of the district attorney's office. When your
university is pressured to lower standards until 80 percent of the
students graduate with honors ... choke the halls of the board of
regents. When an 8-year-old boy pecks a girl's cheek on the
playground and gets hauled into court for sexual harassment
...march on that school and block its doorways.

When someone you elected is seduced by political power and betrays
you ... petition them, oust them, banish them. When
Time magazine's cover portrays millennium nuts as deranged, crazy
Christians holding a cross as it did last month ... boycott
their magazine and the products it advertises.

So that this nation may long endure, I urge you to follow in the
hallowed footsteps of the great disobediences of history that
freed exiles, founded religions, defeated tyrants, and yes, in the
hands of an aroused rabble in arms and a few great men, by
God's grace, built this country.

If Dr. King were here, I think he would agree.

Thank you.

 - att1.htm


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Due to size constraints on the Outlook System, the Public Report can no longer be included in the same email with the Weekly Management report. The Public Report is still accessible, however, at the intranet site address listed below. For this week, we will also be sending a supplemental email with the Public Report attached.
The Weekly Management and Public reports can now be accessed directly through the EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access these report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site, please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose at x31670.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


I agree with Bob on #1.
I am indifferent on #2, but will vote with Bob because he is a nice guy.

> ----------
> From: 	Harshbarger, Robert[SMTP:bharsh@puget.com]
> Sent: 	2001, October, 08 10:24 AM
> To: 	'Hackney, Mark'; 'Grow, Lisa'; 'Lacen, Don'; 'DEMPSEY, JERRY';
> 'Cobb, Steven'; 'Scholtes, Diana'; 'Smith, Chris'; 'Fotiou, Demetrios'
> Subject: 	FW: WSCC Tagging practices
>
> Okay - our exchanges of e-mail were suppose to improve mutual
> understanding
> and it seems to keep getting deeper as I go.
>
> Two issues - 1) putting multiple transmission providers on the same path
> on
> a tag (stacking of parallel providers), and 2) transmissionless
> interchange
> (business practice #11)
>
> Number 1 - don't we in the WSCC want the ability to have tags that can
> contain multiple transmission providers on the same path?  For example
> PSEI,
> PGE, and BPAT are all TPs offering Johnday-COB service.  There could be a
> transaction that would utilize a reservation with each provider and it
> would
> be most convenient to stack all that information in one tag.
>
> Andy suggests the WSCC might want to come-up with an alternative, such as
> one administrator TP for the whole path.  Sounds like an RTO.
>
> So, if we have a choice, we prefer the ability to stack providers on a tag
> -
> yes???
>
> Number 2 - the transmissionless interchange.  I have been suggesting that
> we
> will continue on with our practice just using the TP that belongs to
> source
> (or sink) as stated in BP #11.  Andy doesn't think that'll fly in 1.7.
> What
> really concerns me is his statement that "Under 1.7, a CA cannot exist
> without a parent TP."  Funny, I always looked at it the other way around.
> I
> don't know what that means to SCL, CHPD, and other CAs who, up till now,
> have not registered as TPs.
>
> My example was a MIDC CA to CA transaction that has historically been at
> the
> bus without transmission.  The participants have traditionally used their
> interchange accounting systems to record these deals as scheduled
> interchange with another CA.  Transmission was not taken into
> consideration
> since the participants had owned and/or contract rights from MIDC to their
> systems.  In addition, it has been an easy way to path-it-out by sinking
> it,
> then creating separate transaction source at the same place.
>
> I did feel that this issue shouldn't be brought to IS's attention - that
> we
> would just work it out with our business practices.  What do you think?
>
> Bob Harshbarger
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > Sent: 	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:23 AM
> > To: 	Harshbarger, Robert
> > Subject: 	RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > With regard to item 1, solution C was to communicate that WSCC could
> > explore any number of other options and propose them to either its
> > members or to the IS.  For example, TOs could be granted allocations of
> > rights sold through a single virtual Tariff Administrator.  I guess the
> > real goal was to pull the IS out of the decision making process and give
> > the control to the WSCC, and if the WSCC said "we are going to do option
> > a or b," then that would be fine - provided that a CONCRETE practice was
> > defined, so that everybody in the WSCC did it the same.
> >
> > Item 2 will be a problem in E-Tag 1.7, because of how it deals with the
> > relationship between TPs and CAs.
> >
> > In 1.67, a CA can exist independent of a TP (hence the simple fix of
> > adding a single dummy TP).  Under 1.7, a CA cannot exist without a
> > parent TP.  I think this will cause problems.  Theoretically, it is the
> > same answer as is used in 1.67, but I think it may be much more
> > confusing to many.  I would propose a formal practice, registered in
> > Policy or some other document, that indicates how this is done (for
> > example, create a virtual TP called "WSCC Title Transfer" and have WSCC
> > entities use that specific TP, or something like that).  This would go a
> > long way to reducing confusion about how each CA does business (I have
> > been told it varies form company to company, and even sometimes from
> > shift to shift).
> >
> > In your example, you indicate that "fake" transmission is being used.
> > You also indicate that there is no CA to CA interchange occurring.  What
> > is indicated by going from the PSEI control area to the PCW control
> > area?  If this is a title transfer, then it has been tagged incorrectly.
> > The only other interpretation I can make is that the energy is moving
> > from the PSEI control area to the PCW control area.  You previous
> > discussion seems to support this also.  I am not sure how dynamic
> > schedules or grandfather transmission relate, as those are required to
> > be tagged also, as they should be using transmission service.  I know
> > the WSCC has been violating that practice, and recently sought an
> > exemption form the IS, but at this point, the exemption has been denied.
> >
> > I would appreciate an explanation, as I am unsure I yet understand what
> > is happening.  Is it a title transfer, or is it interchange?
> >
> > Andy Rodriquez
> > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > 713-345-3771
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:03 AM
> > To: Rodriquez, Andy
> > Subject: RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> >
> >
> > Comments were inserted in your letter contained in the body of your
> > original
> > e-mail.  I've copied and pasted that text into a Word document -
> > formatting
> > all screwed-up.
> >
> >  <<comments to IS letter.doc>>
> >
> > The posted WSCC business practice #11 reads:
> >
> > For transactions that occur at only one bus (i.e. no OASIS/GF
> > transmission
> > involved) use a willing TP on the second line with the same PSE as on
> > the
> > first line and the words "Single Bus" in the OASIS reservation field and
> > "7-F" as the Product.
> >
> > Guess we need to understand what it is about 1.7 that prevents someone
> > from
> > creating a tag for these types of transactions.
> >
> > A related issue to this is there CAs that are not registered as TPs.
> > So,
> > when Seattle City Light sells to Chelan PUD at the MID-C, who does the
> > transmission segment of the tag.  Neither has registered as a TP.  So
> > the
> > transaction just doesn't get tagged.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > > ----------
> > > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > > Sent: 	Monday, October 08, 2001 7:14 AM
> > > To: 	Harshbarger, Robert
> > > Cc: 	Hackney, Mark; Grow, Lisa; DEMPSEY, JERRY; McIntosh, Jim;
> > Lacen,
> > Don
> > > Subject: 	RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> > >
> > > Bob,
> > >
> > > I did not get your attached file.  Please resend.
> > >
> > > I know that there is fake transmission that is supposed to be used
> > > today, but I continue to see situations where that is not applied.  As
> > > it stands today, the incorrect practice will function under 1.6, but
> > not
> > > under 1.7.  As such, I would like to see a definitive 1.7 practice
> > > defined and listed someplace so that ALL of WSCC has to follow the
> > > practice.  Otherwise, our West desk has no idea what is right or
> > wrong,
> > > and they end up having to memorize the ways that each provider likes
> > to
> > > see their tags.  That is unacceptable.
> > >
> > > Andy Rodriquez
> > > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > > 713-345-3771
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM
> > > To: Rodriquez, Andy
> > > Cc: 'Hackney, Mark'; 'Grow, Lisa'; 'DEMPSEY, JERRY'; 'McIntosh, Jim';
> > > 'Lacen, Don'
> > > Subject: FW: WSCC Tagging practices
> > >
> > >
> > > Andy -
> > >
> > > I marked-up your draft letter with comments.
> > >
> > > The second issue should be removed.  Our current practice is to
> > specify
> > > fake
> > > transmission for these bus to bus control area interchanges.  I think
> > > that
> > > will still be possible in 1.7.  In any event I inserted some related
> > > comments in that section, too.
> > >
> > > Robert Harshbarger
> > > Puget Sound Energy
> > > OASIS Trading Manager
> > > 425.882.4643 (desk)
> > > 206.604.3251 (cell)
> > >
> > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > > > Sent: 	Friday, October 05, 2001 8:26 AM
> > > > To: 	osc@nerc.com
> > > > Subject: 	WSCC Tagging practices
> > > >
> > > > Please review this letter and make sure it is correct.  These issues
> > > > were brought up in our Phoenix tag training.  I will plan on sending
> > > to
> > > > the IS Monday morning.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Members of the IS,
> > > >
> > > > In our recent E-Tag 1.7 Training sessions, we had two common issues
> > > > brought up regarding the way tags are handled in the WSCC.  We would
> > > > like your guidance and assistance in regard to these issues.
> > > >
> > > > 1.) Jointly owned transmission
> > > >
> > > > In the west, several jointly owned transmission facilities exist.
> > In
> > > > these situations, one particular line or path is managed by operated
> > > > within a single
> > > > control area, but has several different Transmission Owners.  In the
> > > > East, I believe that we  address this situation by having one entity
> > > > administer a single OATT and the TOs receive transmission revenues
> > as
> > > > distributions from the administrator of the OATT (much the way that
> > > SPP
> > > > or MAPP distribute regional tariff revenues to their members).
> > > >
> > > > In the west, they have taken a somewhat different approach.  In this
> > > > case, each TO administers their own tariff.  So it is possible that
> > a
> > > > transaction could utilize more than one TP on the same transmission
> > > > segment.  In such a situation (and
> > > > common practice) for a tag to be written that could "stacks" TPs.
> > So
> > > we
> > > > might
> > > > see in a tag a three transmission providers all flowing on the same
> > > path
> > > > within the same Control Area:
> > > >
> > > > CA		TP	OASIS		PATH
> > > >
> > > > AAA	AAA	123456		POINTA/POINTB
> > > > AAA	BBB	234567		POINTA/POINTB
> > > > AAA	CCC	345678		POINTA/POINTB
> > > >
> > > > Is this representation of the transaction's physical segment valid?
> > > We
> > > > perceive several potential  have two solutions:
> > > >
> > > > a.) Tag as above for convenience
> > > > b.) Tag as a separate tag for each TP
> > > > c.) Indicate to WSCC that process is invalid, and let them determine
> > > > their own solution [note: there are only two possibilities here.
> > > Solution
> > > > c suggests a PSE can not buy transmission from multiple providers
> > for
> > > the
> > > > same path].
> > > >
> > > > Some concerns have been raised by some WSCC members that "solution
> > a"
> > > is
> > > > might be difficult during curtailment processing, as it is hard to
> > > > determine
> > > > which cuts should be made at what points.  However, other entities
> > > point
> > > > out that the tag does represent energy flow along a single contract
> > > > path, and the "stacking" really only identifies contractual
> > > > relationships (and as such, should be allowed).
> > > >
> > > > Regardless of how the issue is resolved, we encourage the
> > development
> > > of
> > > > a standard method for handling this situation, and believe that
> > > standard
> > > > should be developed by either the WSCC or the IS.
> > > >
> > > > 2.) Control Area Bus Transfers
> > > > [note: I'm not sure we can include this second issue because of the
> > > size
> > > > and scope of the issues surrounding it.  1.67 has required a minimum
> > > of
> > > > one transmission segment in the tag  and the WSCC worked around this
> > > > requirement by using fake PTP transmission segments.  The same
> > should
> > > > probably work for 1.7].
> > > >
> > > > In the west, there is the practice of moving energy to different
> > > Control
> > > > Area entities at a bus.  In the east, I we accommodate this through
> > > > title transfers and consider it a market mechanism rather than an
> > > > operations mechanism.  For example:
> > > >
> > > > Merchant MMMMMM Generates 100MW in Control Area AAAA
> > > > Marketer NNNNNN buys at the bus and sells to OOOOOO
> > > > Marketer OOOOOO buys at the bus and sells to PPPPPP
> > > > Marketer PPPPPP buys at the bus and wheels from AAAA to BBBB...
> > > >
> > > > In the WSCC, such transactions are tagged in a different manner.
> > > > [note: MIDC is not tagged like this - everyone is a PSE except for
> > the
> > > CA
> > > > generating and the CA sinking or wheeling away from the MIDC.  There
> > > is
> > > > not any CA to CA to CA to CA interchanges as long as the energy
> > > doesn't
> > > > leave the bus.]
> > > 	More typical are direct transactions specifying "fake"
> > > transmission
> > > (especially real-time):
> > > > CA		TP	PSE		OASIS		PATH
> > > INFO
> > > 	PSEI		PSEMKT					G@MIDC
> > > 	PCW	PCW	PAC01		NOR		MIDC
> > > L
> > >
> > > > The WSCC practice is not currently supported by E-Tag 1.7.  The
> > > > structure of E-Tag 1.7 is predicated on the fact that energy cannot
> > > move
> > > > between Control Areas without use of transmission.
> > > >
> > > > Historically, participants at the generator bus have found it more
> > > > efficient to track these energy exchanges at the bus as scheduled
> > > > interchange between their respective control areas.  In addition,
> > they
> > > > typically have owned transmission and/or long-term, grandfather
> > > > transmission rights to move energy to/from the jointly owned bus to
> > > their
> > > > systems via dynamic schedules.
> > > >
> > > > This issue has recently been discussed by the IS with regard to such
> > > > situations where transactions use NO transmission (i.e., energy
> > moves
> > > > between CAs across bus, with no transmission service).  If I
> > remember
> > > > correctly, the IS discussed several different issues:
> > > >
> > > > How can a single bus be simultaneously metered in several different
> > > > Control Areas?
> > > > If no physical movement of power occurs, why are these transactions
> > > > tagged?
> > > > If the power DOES move (even across a bus) then shouldn't that
> > > movement
> > > > be accomplished under a tariff?
> > > >
> > > > As I remember the IS resolution, it was decided that such
> > transactions
> > > > should indicate the use of PTP transmission if indeed power is
> > moving
> > > > between Control Areas.  Otherwise, the market turn approach used in
> > > the
> > > > East (illustrated in the first example) should be utilized.
> > > >
> > > > This specifically becomes an issue, as E-Tag 1.67 would allow the
> > > > current WSCC practice and 1.7 will not.  We would encourage the IS
> > to
> > > > make sure WSCC is fully prepared for this situation, and has WSCC
> > > > practices in place that address this issue.
> > > > Andy Rodriquez
> > > > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > > > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > > > 713-345-3771
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > > affiliate
> > > > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> > use
> > > of
> > > > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> > > disclosure by
> > > > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > (or
> > > > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> > or
> > > > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > > > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> > > hereto)
> > > > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
> > > or
> > > > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
> > > any of
> > > > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
> > may
> > > not
> > > > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > > > otherwise. Thank you.
> > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Marie:  Who are the people you normally appoint to sign, etc., on brokerage
accounts?  Should Enron South America consider using the same people in order
set up this account?  We could then appoint Enron South America people
later.  Thanks.  Nancy
---------------------- Forwarded by Nancy Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/07/99 03:35 PM ---------------------------

Robert H George
10/07/99 03:16 PM
To: Nancy Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: brokerage account

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert H George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/07/99 06:17 PM ---------------------------

Patrick H Hickey@ECT
10/07/99 11:32 AM
To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert H George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: brokerage account

I spoke with Ted Murphy regarding setting up the brokerage account for the
Copel shares.  He indicated that the easiest thing to do is coordiante with
Sara Shackelton (ECT finance lawyer).  Typically, she sets up the paperwork
and Ted (or Rick) signs off on setting up the account (she has done this many
times).  Robert may have already done this or it may not be necessary in this
case - I will leave that up to him.  Regardless, Ted (or Rick) does need to
be one of the people who sign the documents.  Sorry for the delay.

Patrick


Kim:
Can I get  4 tix for the following games:
Apr 21 or 22 vs. St Louis
Jun 15 vs Texas
Jun 17 vs Texas
Thanks,
John

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/27/2001 09:45 AM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Don
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Douglas
Clifford/NY/ECT@ECT, Michael J Miller/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Allan Keel/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate,
Bruce Sukaly/ENRON@enronXgate, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve
Pruett/ENRON@enronXgate, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Parks/ENRON@enronXgate, Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Greer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Astro's Baseball Season Tickets

The 2001 Astro's season is about to kick-off and Enron Americas Office of the
Chairman has four tickets to each game available for customer events.

If you are interested in using the tickets, please call Kim Hillis at x30681.


Marty/Tim,

Here is pricing information about harassment prevention training.  Feel free
to call Kerry directly about his availability.

Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 03:14
PM ---------------------------

"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> on 10/26/2000 07:58:14 AM
To: "'michelle.cash@enron.com'" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Harassment Training

Michelle:

Thanks for the call.  I have not heard from Marty Christian (spelling?)
about training but will be glad to talk to her about scheduling.  Regarding
the cost, the price I quoted before was $1500 for half day, and $2500 for a
whole day.  The actors are $100 apiece per presentation ($300 total for each
presentation). Typically, I can do three sessions in a half day and five in
a whole day.  Thus, total cost with the actors for a half day would be $2400
and $4000 for a whole day.  One issue with the actors is that they do shows
in the morning at their theater so afternoons usually are better for them.
I know they have some Fridays in November in which they are open full days.

Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply
email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com


Mike has this deal in his trade log as 25 MW, but he said he'd go with the
broker on this one and sell 50 MW to BPA.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

461136
mike
broker has 25 mw, we have 50


Natural is now producing hourly "0" bottoming patterns to go  along with the daily and weekly "0" patterns.  If there is anything left on  the downside, it's from here.  A close above 228 today is a good daily buy  signal on my work and should lead to a more sustainable rally.

Crude has short-term targets into tomorrow for a low.   Price around 2005 - 2040.  Still looking for a rally to see $23+ into  early-mid Feb.

By the way, since my client base has shrunk in the last  couple of months, any suggestions for possible contacts who you think might find  my work useful?  Thanks,


Trying to put something together.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Always.  By the way, did you have further thoughts about a call to develop a comprehensive Nevada strategy?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Are we still friends??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Thanks.  I hate it when I sound petulant.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

My fault for not making it clear that you should have been in the loop.  We will send out a message across the board to help with this.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

This is going to sound like empire building. But I need to know what we're doing with PGE.  I don't need to participate in the calls--but I do need to know.  The PGE folks need to have confidence that I'm aware of our positions and plans.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

We are having a conference call tomorrow with PGE.  They did not decide anything on the last conference call after I told them why Enron retail in the East likes the Duquense type imbalance (no bandwidth, thus no penalties-- imbalances settle at verifiable system lambda).  John Malowney of EPMI west desk likes the bandwidth, but we are discussing it further since it has created problems for the East EES desk (due to the penalties associated with being outside the bandwidth).  John likes the PGE proposal to settle at an index price, but PGE is reconsidering that aspect.

Unfortunately, I don't know of any TPs that allow a bandwidth without penalties.

Let me know if you want to participate in the call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	PGE Imbalance Charge

Christi --

What's the latest on the PGE imbalance method??

Jim


Our next Vision and Values Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 19 from
9 a.m. until noon in 46c1.  The agenda for the meeting is attached.

See you on Wednesday!

Gina


Attached please find an updated Inclement Weather Contact List.  If there are
any revisions, please contact Lisa Cousino at Ext. 3-6343.

Lisa Cousino from Heather's desk
x3-6343
713-905-9824 (pager)


i see east carolina but i don't see teetee; it doesn't bode well for the
gallery furniture bowl
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:12 AM
---------------------------

Luis Mena@ENRON
12/06/2000 08:41 AM
To: Roberto Martinez/HOU/EES@EES, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Top 10 Colleges with the Best Looking Girls

Thank you for your attention.
---------------------- Forwarded by Luis Mena/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:33 AM
---------------------------

"Jason Van Kirk" <jvankirk@mercatorcapital.com> on 12/06/2000 08:06:56 AM
Please respond to <jvankirk@mercatorcapital.com>
To: "Oscar Szigeti" <oszigeti@lifeminders.com>, "Nick Schuneman"
<wuhbow@yahoo.com>, "Myron Van Kirk" <mvankirk@vkri.com>, "Michael J. Smith"
<msmith@mercatorcapital.com>, "Mark Murray" <mmurray@nationaljournal.com>,
"Luis Mena" <Luis_Mena@ei.enron.com>, "John F. Baring"
<jbaring@mercatorcapital.com>, "John Appuliese" <jappuliese@aol.com>,
"Guillaume Girard" <ggirard@mercatorcapital.com>, "Erin D. Carlson"
<e.carlson@mail.utexas.edu>, "Dave Foster" <BDLFoster@aol.com>, "Chris
Schuneman" <CSCHUNEMAN@itg.mea.com>, "Rod Hackman"
<rhackman@mercatorcapital.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Top 10 Colleges with the Best Looking Girls

May I have your attention, please!!

<ahem>

Just wanted everyone to know that Texas was voted #1 by Playboy magazine for
"Colleges with the Best Looking Girls".  As if we needed affirmation of this
fact...

But, now, we have full-fledged proof to show the world where it's at.

I've never been prouder to say, "Hook 'em Horns!!"

This comes from playboy.com

The List:

1.  The University of Texas
2.  Arizona State
3.  UCLA
4.  University of Florida
5.  University of Arizona
6.  Florida State
7.  University of Alabama
8.  University of Colorado
9.  East Carolina
10. University of Georgia


IMPORTANT: Please do not respond to this e-mail. Please
submit all inquiries via the Contact Us link at the bottom
of any page.

ADD TO THE PLAYOFF FUN

Why leave some teams on the sideline come playoff time? The
league's commissioner can schedule "consolation" matchups
during the playoff tournament. In the Front Office, go to
Schedule, Matchups and choose the week(s) that your
playoffs take place. Under "Other Games," you can set any
matchups you want. If there are two teams that split the
regular season series, here's a great way to settle the
score. Of course, these matchups won't count toward your
league's "official" championship, but they prolong the
season, and the fun, for those teams that came up short.

STAY ON TOP OF ALL PLAYER INJURY INFO

As the season winds down and your team battles for playoff
positioning, it's more important than ever to have the
latest injury news. Your league's web site contains all the
injury information you need to make informed lineup
decisions. For a snapshot view of all recent player
injuries and status, go to Scouting Reports, Injuries. Go
to Scouting Reports, Player Updates for continually updated
news and fantasy analysis for all NFL players. To see the
most recent updates for the players on your team, go to
Teams, Player News. Also, monitor our News, NFL News page
for weekly Q&A sessions and "Injury Roundup" columns from
Steve Cohen, CBS SportsLine's pro football injury guru.

MILLER LITE

The tab for SportsLine's FREE Fantasy Football is being
picked up by Miller Lite, our favorite beer around here.
Check them out offline at your local bar or online with us.
Grab a Miller Lite. It's Miller Time!

http://cbs.sportsline.com/links/2/60/fantasyfb1110miller.cgi

FOLLOW THE LEADERS

Using the Statistics, Leaders link, you can find out the
leading players in any statistical category. Just choose a
statistic in the listbox above the report, click GO, and
the current leaders will be displayed. It's a great way to
find the best free agent, or trade possibility, if you need
to fill a late-season need or replace one of your injured
starters.

PLANTERS

Football Season is Planters Season. Don't get left on the
sidelines. Planters brings you TWO ways to win! Click here:

http://cbs.sportsline.com/links/2/60/fantasyfb1110planters.cgi

COMPLETE SUNDAY NFL COVERAGE

You never have to leave your league's web site for complete
coverage during Sunday's games. If you can manage to peel
yourself away from Live Scoring, check Scouting Reports,
Player Updates for breaking player news as it happens. Be
sure to monitor our News, NFL News page for gameday fantasy
tips, and throughout the week as our staff is committed to
providing the most complete fantasy and NFL news coverage
on the web.

THE TOP SCORERS, BY POSITION

Along with the leaders in any statistical category, you can
also find the leaders at each position. Go to Statistics,
Player Scoring to see how many fantasy points your players
have scored each week. Use the second listbox above the
report to view week-by-week fantasy scores for all players
at a specific position. It's yet another great way to scout
players for that key late-season trade or free agent
pickup.

WIN THE FANTASY FOOTBALL TRIP OF A LIFETIME!

Love to surf the cbs.sportsline.com site? You could win a
4-day/3-night weekend in Florida to attend Cris Carter's
FAST Program! Rewards members who earn the most points each
week win great prizes and one lucky member who earns the
most points between now and December 16th wins the trip!
Earn 50 points EVERY DAY simply by surfing the
cbs.sportsline.com site! Click here to get started now!

http://cbs.sportsline.com/links/2/60/fantasyfb1110rewards.cgi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation.
If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please respond to
remove@commissioner.com.  Do not respond to this email directly.

This message was sent to: ebass@enron.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Taylor, Michael E
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:30:58 GMT
Subject:

Northwestern Steel and Wire	David Lon	815-625-2500		90 NOx

bankcruptcy review

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2001 1:48:19 GMT
Subject:

grandfathered facility in montgomery county:  nsr, no need.  cap and trade will be involved.  current plan is to do inside own fence, will clean up.  haven't seen any real opp to create allowances.  power plant will be unregulated after first of year.  2-260 MW program.  call back at after first of year, will be looking at control tech.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:37:34 GMT
Subject:

708 VOC
2/18/20039

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:24:57 GMT
Subject:

Air Products and Chemicals	Steven Morrison	281-874-7113		71 tpy NOx

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:30:22 GMT
Subject:

Royal Baths Mfg. 	William Munoz	281-442-3400		16 tpy NOx	msg 8-22

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:05:00 GMT
Subject:

 (

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:42:30 GMT
Subject:

Have 3 seperate plants: Quest seperation, will be part of the program by about 1/2 ton
will call when they need allowances

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:13:45 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:16:41 GMT
Subject:

Matt Paul: Emissions
DTE- Koch before.  Traded emissions.  Jeremy Taylor
Coal so big.  Have focused most all their efforts around coal.
Will not be very focused much on it this year either.  4-6 months:
734-887-2053 paulm2@dteenergy.com <mailto:paulm2@dteenergy.com>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, August 3, 2001 7:49:11 GMT
Subject:

Not doing much this year.  Not sure who's going to do stuff this year.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 7:17:47 GMT
Subject:

willhavesomeonegetincontactwithme

have mike t put something together on what we do.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 4:51:10 GMT
Subject:

wrong number

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:47:45 GMT
Subject:

Henry Platt: Out
Deals with Emissions: 713-669-2945
registered a bunch of credits for DERCs
Do a permit by rule on the comperssion, if over 240 HP.  Alot of smaller units,

call back on monday

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:58:45 GMT
Subject:

340.7 T/VOC
250.5 T NOx
EXP- 12/1/2006

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:21:10 GMT
Subject:

499.1 NOx
1/20/2009

msg in 8-20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, July 6, 2001 2:07:36 GMT
Subject:

call July 9


Michelle, Steve had to re-schedule his Derivatives class for next month due
to a scheduling conflict.  In his place, I have scheduled you so you would
not have to wait until August.  I hope you are available.  (smile)

Your class is scheduled for July 11 and 12.  Please mark your calendar..

adr


The attached schedule is for Tuesday, March 26.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


We have only the heights for now - maybe someday we'll see days 8 and 9.
Good luck,
Dave

http://www.sca.uqam.ca/models/
http://www.sca.uqam.ca/models/ecmwf_amer/cep00_9panel.gif


The Commission just voted out one half of the "Bilas Alternate."

The decision that got voted out included Bilas' DWR-based language stating
that the PUC 1) would not second-guess DWR purchases and 2) would pass
through DWR costs to customers.
However, in a move led by Commissioner Carl Wood, the decision removed the
Bilas language on Direct Access.  The decision therefore did NOT include the
Bilas language staying any Commission action on implementing the Direct
Access prohibition.  Carl Wood called including Direct Access "the height of
arrogance."
The decision was voted out 3-2, with the 2 remaining Republicans dissenting.
That said, the Commission has no proposal before it implementing the
prohibition, and there was no talk at the meeting of implementing the
prohibition any time soon.

Best,
Jeff


Please plan to meet Stan Jablonski in the Plaza this afternoon at 3:30 p.m.
today, May 16, 2001.

Suzanne and I will  come by with the hardhats and safety glasses while you
are waiting in the Plaza.

Thank you.


Dutch, I need the bid/offer spread as well.  For each transaction, I need the prevailing bid/offer spread. Could you get that quickly?  I will wait for that right now. I am out tomorrow and would like to work on this on the weekend.

Thanks,

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Cc:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: Neural Networks

Here is the EOL information

 << File: eol for 10-17.XLS >>
Dutch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:21 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	FW: Neural Networks

This guy is working on an EOL project for me right now.  Can you send him a file with our EOL trades for today or yesterday with product, price, buy/sell, and timestamp but counterparty names deleted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: Neural Networks

John, just a reminder, please send a sample gapping data when you get a chance.

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com


Sara,

Okay, looks to me like Weyerhaueser wants us to act as their counsel.  I told
Bill to propose the language he wanted, but he said his lawyer was out of
town for two weeks.  Which makes me wonder if they can even sign this thing
without her consent, but I did not think to ask him this at the time.

Anyway, he basically wants to add a third party guarantee as eligible credit
support in the event of a downgrade.  He said he is willing to include
language indicating that the nondowngraded party would have to accept this
guarantee, subject to a commercially reasonable objection.  On its face, I
have no objection to such a provision, but would like to quickly bounce it
off of you.  I'm not sure that I want to be forced to disclose what that
reason is....

And basically, I also have no objection to allowing the posting of collateral
in a form and amount acceptable to the nondowngraded party, with such amount
subject to change as conditions warrant.

Also, I thought we usually had assignability to affiliates so long as the
guarantor remained the same.  I think Bill indicated we probably removed that
because we had it this way with the Canadian subsidiary.  He wants to put it
back in.  I want it back in as well.

Otherwise, we are increasing the guaranty amounts to $25MM, and they have
agreed to the cross default provisions.

Let's discuss this when you get a minute.  He had some additional
clarification he needed, but these seemed to be the legal issues on his
list.  I don't think there is going to be any way around this other than to
call him and explain.  Sorry.

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Bowman, Bill" <bill.bowman@weyerhaeuser.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bowman+2C+20Bill+22+20+3Cbill+2Ebowman+40weyerhaeuser+2E
com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Radous, Paul
Subject: Provisions

1 - We would like the right to assign to another counterparty as well as
Enron.  Something within Weyerhaeuser.

2 - If Weyerhaeuser or Enron below investment grade, can

 Post collateral, Counterparty will act in a commercially reasonable
manner

 Obtain a third party guarantee, Counterparty will act in a
commercially reasonable manner

Regards,

Bill Bowman
Phone - 253-924-3418
Fax - 253-924-3870
e-mail bill.bowman@weyerhaeuser.com

All contents in this e-mail should be considered proprietary and treated in
a confidential manner


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 08:58 AM -----

	Mark E Haedicke
	Sent by: Janette Elbertson
	06/05/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail Brownfeld/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Lindeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harlan Murphy/NA/Enron@Enron, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Sarah
Bruck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marie Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/Enron@EnronXGate, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samantha Ferguson/NA/Enron@Enron, Majed Nachawati/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keegan
Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Esmeralda Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Vanessa
Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate, Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, MaryHelen
Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rae
Meadows/ENRON@EnronXgate, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Truss/Enron@EnronXGate, Alice Wright/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa
Zucha/NA/Enron@Enron, Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Save the Date -- Star Wars:  The Magic of Myth

The Museum of Fine Arts Houston


can't wait


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 29, 2000 5:00pm through January 2, 2001 12:00am

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EES   POSTPONED
Time:  Sat 12/30/2000 at  9:15:00 PM CT thru Sat 12/30/2000 at  11:45:00 PM CT
 Sat 12/30/2000 at  7:15:00 PM PT thru Sat 12/30/2000 at    9:45:00 PM PT
 Sun 12/31/2000 at  3:15:00 AM London thru Sun 12/31/2000 at  5:45:00 AM
London
Outage:  Add RSM to EES EB Routers
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Remove traffic from the ATM links for improved reliability, prepare
for migration to Gigabit to connect to Ardmore.
       Each network will be down approximately 10 minutes for switchover.
Backout: Move routing functionality back to Ardmore
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox  713-853-5337

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:     POSTPONED
Impact:
Time:  Fri 12/29/2000 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/29/2000 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/29/2000 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/29/2000 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 12/30/2000 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 12/30/2000 at  3:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  EB & 3AC Lucent Switch Software Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for IP trunking
Backout: Back-up optical disks will be used to reload all translations.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard   713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


-----Original Message-----
From: 	webmaster@cera.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:29 AM
To:	clients@cera.com
Subject:	Distributed Energy Investment Challenge--Expectations Meet New Realities - CERA Private Report

Title: Energy Technology Investing: The Bubble Bursts
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2978;

***********************************************************************

DISTRIBUTED ENERGY INVESTMENT CHALLENGE--EXPECTATIONS MEET NEW REALITIES

Between 1998 and 2001, investors poured some US$4.36 billion into companies
developing distributed energy (DE) technologies. This investment boom and the
subsequent capital market correction were created by overly optimistic
expectations regarding the size of the opportunity and speed of the market's
development.

*  DE's failure to capture a substantial portion of the California market
during the power crisis in early 2001 and the collapse of the
telecommunications and information technology sectors undermined investors'
confidence. Shifting power market fundamentals and growing uncertainty over the
pace and direction of regulatory change also contributed.

*  Although the short-term market for DE technologies has suffered, in the long
run the revised expectations are part of a healthy trend toward greater
maturity among companies and their backers.

*  Restricted access to capital will slow commercialization of new technologies
and drive consolidation among energy technology companies. Public policy will
become an increasingly important source of funds and other support in the
future.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete Private Report (16 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Private Report
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Distributed Energy

*****************************************************************************************
CERAWeek2002 - February 11-15, 2002 - 21st Annual Executive Conference and
Related Events REGISTER ONLINE TODAY AT:  http://www.cera.com/ceraweek
** Two- and Four-day Passes Available
** Special Enrollment Programs
** Partnership Opportunities
** CERAWeek Online Premium Access
*****************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Sorry, but could you please print these out for me?  If the "eei.doc" is too
long, please just print out the other two.  Thanks a million.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 07:12 PM -----

	Christian Yoder@ECT
	02/14/2001 05:00 PM

		 To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: contractual language

---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
02:39 PM ---------------------------

Christian Yoder

02/14/2001 02:57 PM
To: civalek@hdw.com, jbpirog@hdw.com
cc:
Subject: contractual language

John,
For the call at 4, here are some contractual provisions, and a piece on CPUC
talking points.  These are very much still in process and we reserve the
right to modify our language or add new terms, but wanted to show you where
we are in our thinking at this point. ----cgy


Ken:

Rosie has marked your calendar for Wednesday December 13th to attend a
luncheon and speech at the Hyatt Downtown in the Lay Lecture Series.

Barton Smith of UH will share the results of the economic study he is
co-directing on the costs and benefits of the Houston region complying with
the TNRCC SIP for ozone.  (This is the Greater Houston Partnership study I
have told you about.)  Dr. George Tolley of the University of Chicago will
also be present for the question and answer period.

I will give you more information as the event approaches.

- Rob

Robert L. Bradley Jr.
Director, Public Policy Analysis
Enron Corp.
P.O Box 1188, Room 4724a
[1400 Smith Street 77002]
Houston, Texas 77251-1188

(P) 713-853-3062
(F) 713-646-4702

Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-4702
jstrans@enron.com


It does more harm than good to just do the one leg.  We are currently
settling all of these deals incorrectly b/c they are pointing to the Houston
office instead of Calgary.  Please let me know if there is anything that I
can do to make sure this happens more quickly.

Thanks

From: Michael Swaim on 12/12/2000 10:13 AM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Counterparties w/ Master Agreements with ECC

  I can make the list of counterparties used by the bridge database driven,
and have it maintainable via the Tagg maintenance program. Currently, the
bridge only does the first part of the deal. Flipping out the deal between
ENA and ECC has to be done manually. Because we're currently making a number
of changes to the bridge already, and I have other commitments, I'm loathe to
tackle automating the second leg until sometime after January.

Mike
x36043

Dawn C Kenne
12/12/2000 10:00 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Swaim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Counterparties w/ Master Agreements with ECC

I have received an updated list of the counterparties that have Master
Agreements with ECC.  There are now about 40 counterparties that fall under
this category.  What seems to be happening is that these counterparties are
hitting on US gas products on EOL and are not bridging into Tagg correctly.
Currently, they are bridging as one leg between ENA and the counterparty.
The problem arises during settlement because ENA cannot settle with these
counterparties, only ECC can.  An example of what Risk is doing to the
products after bridging is Tagg#Q79131 / EOL #555401.

RISK:  We need risk to verify that anytime, without exception, all companies
with Master Agreements with ECC that hit a US product must be booked as two
legs:  leg one booked between ECC and the counterparty with risk assignment
of FT-US/CAND-ERMS; leg two flipping the risk out of FT-US/CAND-ERMS to the
appropriate risk book.  Also, risk needs to verify that this is only for
Financial Swaps and not Physical deals.

IT:  It is my understanding that a few counterparties are set up to be booked
correctly (with two legs).  The list is now up to 40 counterparties and will
most likely be updated on a consistent basis.  Is this something that Tagg
Maintenance can handle?  Guidelines need to be set up for Risk/Global to
instruct IT when new Master Agreements are created with counterparties so
logic can be adjusted accordingly.

Does a meeting need to be set up to elaborate on these issues?  Are there any
further issues that need to be addressed concerning ECC Master Agreements?
(i.e. What about when a counterparty with ECC Master Agreement hits a
Canadian product out of the Houston office?)
Please respond with your thoughts on this subject.

Thank you,
Dawn
3-9353


Attached is a roster of the people working on Crescendo internally and
externally.  Please let me know of any updates, changes or additions.

Thanks,
Mark
x31709


Please find attached the final program for an exciting conference on "REAL
OPTIONS VALUATION IN THE NEW ECONOMY: Internet/E-commerce,
R&D/Pharmaceuticals, Energy." The conference, organised in New York City
March 13-15 by the Real Options Group and co-sponsored by Ernst & Young
LLP, is addressed to a corporate audience.

The chairman of the conference is Prof. Michael J. Brennan of UCLA who will
deliver the opening address, and the keynote speaker is Prof. Stewart C.
Myers of MIT.  Many of the world/s thought leaders in real options
analysis, along with prominent experts from many leading corporations will
also share their ideas and experiences.

Please note that the deadline for hotel registration is February 21 (see
the attached brochure for hotel details) and conference fees increase by
20% for those registering after March 1. The (full) conference brochure and
on-line conference registration are available at our website www.rogroup.com

We hope that you will be able to participate and would appreciate it if you
could also communicate this announcement among other interested colleagues.

In fact, it would be most helpful to us and would be greatly appreciated, if
you could send me (also cc. to amicaliz@sda.uni-bocconi.it) a list of 5-10
colleagues to whom we can send the electronic version of the brochure.

Best wishes,

Lenos Trigeorgis
President, Real Options Group

 - ROGNYConference.pdf

Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063


Rick, thanks for the note. I will be in touch with you and Stefan Diescher on
this. The issue I have been faced with, however, is
simply this: I am covering power and gas for three countries on my own. The
demands on my time have been enormous and I have given
Viviana as much of my time as possible. Indeed, at the last PRC, there was
significant pressure to place her in the "has issues" category
and I resisted on the grounds that she needed more time to find her stride.
We have had a number of long meetings where I have noted
in detail what my expectations are and provided her with suggestions on how
to improve. This has included helping her outline a research paper
how to write a slide presentation, what research sources to go to, how to
extract information from people on the phone. In a better world
I would spend more time with her to bring her along, but I am horribly
stretched and need a researcher who is more effective to help
me get the job done. I have also gotten other feedback (including from the
head of the Frankfurt office) that has been rather negative.
My view is that rather than prolong the mutual agony, we should begin the
process of managing her out and helping her secure more
appropriate employment outside the firm. Please let me know what you think.
Thanks, Paul

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Richard Shapiro @ ENRON                           15/05/2001 13:13

To: Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Viviana Florio

I heard more about Viviana before I left London last week and apparently her
concern she was'nt being properly guided or mentored- despite her apparent
current performance and your  lack of time, I think we do owe her an action
plan at mid-year at the latest and a decent opportunity to redeem herself.
Please let me know how I can be of assistance. Thanks.


Raymond,

I shall call you on Sunday after my arrival in Sydney.
Look forward to meeting you again.

I shall be ready to speak on all the topics you mentioned.

Vince

Raymond Yeow@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/09/2000 09:07 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
Subject: Re: Request for suggestions : Vince's visit to sydney in July

Dear Vince,

after getting our heads together here,
we would much apprecaite if you could share the Research Group's latest on
---

- Var ie "... repeat my workshop presentation on value-at-risk..."
 as well as cover additional topics viz.
- Discuss, with application, Enrons internal V@R model, and how this is used
internally.
- Discuss volatility modelling, and whether it is possible to maintain and
trade a term structure of volatility in electricity

- Modelling forward curves with reference to associated markets (eg Oil).
  Can we gain some insights through spreads to related market curves (spark).

I assume your hotel is booked already. Catching the taxi is the best way to
get to your hotel.
Since you are arriving on the weekend , if you need to contact me - my mobile
is 0417-692295, home tel/fax
is 9232-8892

Rgds Raymond

---------------------- Forwarded by Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/07/2000 04:45 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Your visit to sydney in July

Paul, Raymond,

Thanks for your message.
Sorry I did not get in touch  with you earlier. The last few weeks were very
hectic. I am starting
right now my preparations for the presentation I am going to give at the
conference.

Here are the details of my itinerary (I shall send you a copy tomorrow). I
arrive Sunday morning
and leave Saturday morning. The conference takes place on Monday and Tuesday.
On Wednesday, I am making a presentation at the workshop on value-at-risk. I
would
like to stay at the conference for the duration: it's a great learning
opportunity for me.

On Thursday and Friday, as well as in the evenings (except for the evening
of July 18), I am at you disposal.
I would like to take advantage of this trip and learn as much as I can
about the Australian markets and discuss with you the research agenda.
I shall be glad to make several presentation.
I can repeat my workshop presentation on value-at-risk as well as cover
additional
topics.

Vince

Paul Quilkey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/04/2000 05:23 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your visit to sydney in July

Vince
I support Raymond's email and would welcome the opportunity to have you give
a presentation (formal or informal) to the trading group on latest research
initiatives in Houston.  Please let us know your schedule so that we do not
overly burden you during your visit.  Look forward to seeing you and catching
up over a beer.
Thnx
Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 08:23 AM ---------------------------

Raymond Yeow
07/04/2000 08:21 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kirsty Hogarth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elliott
Katz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Gray/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Your visit to sydney in July

Dear Vince,

Hi !, it's only two weeks until the Aust Energy Risk (17-19 July ) seminar in
Sydney.
Is RISK organising your hotel ?

Otherwise, Kirsty can organise for you,
eg harbour vIew at the Regent or convenience to the seminar location at the
Sheraton ?

We would like to make sure that you have all the necessary "comforts" of home
when you are with us,
Elliott & David can set up a desk for you in the office/trading room with
phone etc
so you can use one of our PC to access email or plug in your laptop.
Please let Elliott or David kmow your requirements.

How long will you be with us ?
Is this your first trip to Sydney ?
There are several of us in the office who would like to take you  for a
meal(s)/ show you the sights etc and
discuss the latest Research findings with you whilst you are in Sydney eg VAR.

Hear from you soon.
Raymond
725pm 4 July


Everyone,

Enron has just launched an effort to educate California businesses on the
California energy crisis, engage them in the debate, and coordinate our
efforts in working toward "real solutions".  A direct mail piece was sent out
on Monday from Ken Lay.  The materials that were sent are attached below.

There will be follow up with the businesses that we have targeted.  We also
intend to make contact with non-business organizations in the coming weeks.

PLEASE NOTE:  The letters reference a California website that we have set up
for businesses to receive additional information.  DO NOT GO TO THIS SITE AS
WE ARE TRACKING THE NUMBER OF HITS WE RECEIVE AND WE DON'T WANT A SKEWED
NUMBER DUE TO ENRON EMPLOYEE HITS.

If you have questions, please feel free to call me at 3-9104.
Thanks!

We also enclosed Ken Lay's San Francisco Chronicle op-ed (March 1st), and the
Wall Street Journal article on the economic impact of the energy crisis
(March 8th).


Upon closer examination, more people looking dirty.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.; Bass, Eric; Collins, Joan; Legler, Michael J.; Hull, Bryan; Roberts, Mike A.; Neal, Scott; Gaskill, Chris; Brawner, Sandra F.; Marquez, Jose; Mrha, Jean
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Poor, Poor, Pitiful KEN

Sure sounds to me that Ken is in the same shoes as the rest of us regarding the downfall of ENE.
What do you think????????????????????????
Wouldn't you think the honorable thing would be to refuse any compensation knowing your terrible performance?
I'm sorry! I forgot honorable is not an Enron admirable trait!

The wording of "If he terminates his employment within 60 days of a change of control" sure sounds to me like someone knew what was going on to me?
I guess we should have kept in mind the 2nd definition of LAY in the dictionary is "To put to rest"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	FW: -- DJ Enron CEO -2: Also To Get Reimbursed For Tax Penalties --

 DJ Enron CEO -2: Also To Get Reimbursed For Tax Penalties --

  WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Enron Corp. (ENE) Chief Executive Kenneth Lay could
receive a lump sum payment as much as $80 million as a result of Dynegy Inc.'s
(DYN) plan to acquire Enron, according to a regulatory filing released Tuesday
by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Under Lay's employment agreement, which originally extended through Dec. 31,
2003, Lay was entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the number of full
calendar years remaining under his contract multiplied by $20.2 million if he
terminated his employment within 60 days of a change of control.
  In August, Lay, chairman of Enron, resumed his position as CEO following the
resignation of Jeffrey K. Skilling, Enron's then-president and CEO. At that
time, his contract was extended to Dec. 31, 2005.
  In addition to the lump sum payment, Lay is entitled to an amount for any
related tax penalties if the payment were held to constitute an "excess
parachute payment," according to the filing.
  Dynegy plans to acquire Enron in a stock swap valued around $10.12 billion.
  The deal is expected to close sometime next year, in which case Lay is
entitled to $60.6 million under his contract if he terminates his employment
within the 60 days.
  Houston-based Enron is a utilities and communications company. -Dan Lowrey;
Dow Jones Newswires; 202-393-7402; dan.lowrey@dowjones.com

  (END) Dow Jones Newswires  13-11-01
  1428GMT(AP-DJ-11-13-01 1428GMT)

Symbols:
  US;DYN US;ENE

  13-Nov-2001  14:28:54 GMT
Source DJES   - Dow Jones Energy Service
Categories:
  I/ELC I/GAS I/UES I/XISL N/CNW N/DJWI N/DPG N/LNG N/NRG N/WEI M/NND M/UTI
  P/NRG R/NAPW R/NERC R/NME R/TX R/US R/USS MST/I/ELC MST/I/GAS MST/I MST/N/LNG
  MST/R/NME MST/R/US/TX MST/R/US


Oasis Re-Design Prototype Release Announcement

This announcement is being issued to the Market Participants to provide an
update to the OASIS Re-Design project. Prototype v0.51 was released on
Thursday, March 08, 2001. The following changes were made to the site in
this release:

* XML Download query service has been modified to increase
reliability.
* Empty tags in XML files have been removed.
* Meeting Minutes from XML Working Group Forum of 03/02/2001 have been
added to OASIS Help.

OASIS Re-Design Project Schedule:

* March 08, 2001 - Release of prototype v0.51
* March 08, 2001 - May 03rd, 2001 - Development Period (eight weeks)
* May 03rd, 2001 - May 17th, 2001 - Market Simulation - (two weeks)
* May 17th, 2001 - May 31st, 2001 - Market Hold - (two weeks)
* May 31st, 2001 - Release to production.

 We welcome comments and questions from all interested parties.
 Please send all correspondence to:
 xmlwg@caiso.com


There will be an Enron Management Committee meeting in the boardroom on Monday, January 14, 2002 at 11:00 a.m.

Please let me know whether you plan to attend in person or via conference call.

Thanks.

Rosie


Greetings from the Energy Forum of the James A. Baker III Institute for
Public Policy at Rice University!

You are cordially invited to a special presentation on

MEXICAN ENERGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

by

Ra?l Mu?oz Leos
Director General, Petr?leos Mexicanos (PEMEX)

and

Thomas F. "Mack" McLarty, III
Vice Chairman, Kissinger McLarty Associates
and formerly Special Envoy for the Americas

Friday, June 22, 2001
4:00 p.m.
International Conference Facility
Baker Institute for Public Policy

Reception to Follow

Parking: East Stadium Lot
Entrance 8 or 12

R.S.V.P to 713-348-5794
By Monday, June 18th
--------------------------------------------------

If you have questions or comments regarding this event or the Baker
Institute Energy Forum please email Jason Lyons at jelyons@alumni.rice.edu

If would like to be removed from this list, please reply to katieh@rice.edu.

The Baker Institute is available on the Internet at
http://bakerinstitute.org


Here are the theoretical storage volumes based on the schedule, not noms...
          MSQ       schd  Theoretical Balance
(Embedded image moved to file: pic14354.pcx)

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/23/2000 01:27:23 PM

To:   " - *Kinney, Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
      *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
      *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Theoretical Storage

We need to reach an agreement on the theoretical storage as CES needs to
transfer to NPC a specific volume and price for COH, and AGL ESS, WSS and
Sonat. I had thought we had an understanding that CES would be billed, per
Melissa's memo of 3/15 and conversations during June, the percentages times
the
current month's storage capacity. We may have confused you by sending FOM
noms
for storage injections that were different than that formula, and Doug has
noticed the bills from ENA tend to represent the noms.

How should this be resolved? Should we go on ENA billed volumes or by the
formula? Let me know.
My calculations per the formula would give us the following balances for
7/31/00...
COH-4,053,906
AGL-Sonat- 504,379
AGL-ESS-9,827
AGL-WSS-220,209

 - pic14354.pcx


You are right about one thing....it seems there is never a time when we are
not busy here..  With the job change, my work schedule just got worse.  Sorry
if I sounded wierd, did not mean too, I am sure it was just htat I was in a
hurry.  Talk to you soon.
PL


Lee,

On deal 413447 (Chevron @ Olefins), we have a flex nom of 6,000 to
12,000/day.  Is this a monthly nom or daily nom?  Will we have a swing deal
with them for the winter?  The current swing deal is for Oct only.  For Oct,
they have pulled an average of 16,000/day.

D


resending message

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	MDay
> Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 3:27 PM
> To:	'Kristen Bird'; 'awu@quinnemanuel.com'; 'Richard.Sanders, Enron';
> 'Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com'
> Cc:	JBennett
> Subject:	Direct Access Legislation and the impact on Settlement
> Discussions with UC/CSU
>
> Richard Sanders and Bob Williams asked that I provide the following brief
> memo in order to summarize wherer the legislative efforts are at this time
> and how they might impact settlement discussions.
>
> With the close of the first extraordinary session today, a second
> extraordinary session will open on Monday and all the existing but
> unpassed bills will be reintroduced--so we are told.  That means there
> will continue to be at least 2 bills which would substantially protect the
> rights of customers to choose direct access, although both contemplate
> that under varying circumstances the customer could be required to pay an
> exit fee.
>
> What is relatively likely is this:
>
> A direct access bill will pass this session.  It will likely create the
> following situation:
>
> Any customer who has not been on direct access continuously since before
> January 17, 2001 will have used some power purchased by DWR while being
> charged bundled utility rates far lower than the actual cost.  If these
> customers (like UC) eventually elect to return to direct access they WILL
> be required to pay the shortfall that has accrued while they were on
> bundled service.
>
> Other stranded costs which may be incurred by DWR after the customer
> leaves bundled service for direct access may also be passed on in an exit
> fee.  This would include stranded contract costs if DWR has contracted for
> more long term power than it has customers, as well as any costs related
> to the bond financing intended to pay for the long term power contracts.
> We HOPE that the legislation will have a provision excusing the customers
> from such an exit fee if DWR has not purchased all the net short power by
> long term contracts and DWR can match its supply to the new lower demand
> simply by reducing daily spot purchases.
>
> UC would potentially face the first type of exit fee in any event, it may
> face the second, although there is a possibility of a short "open
> enrollement" period following passage of the bill, which would allow
> customers to switch to DA immediately without paying the second type of
> exit fee.
>
> There may be other exceptions to the exit fees for customers who install
> self generation or distributed generation.  This might affect a few UC
> campuses, but not all.
>
> At least one of the bills might give the CPUC enough discretion to permit
> it to impose onerous conditions on direct access and thereby prohibit it.
> However, this provision is strongly opposed by many customer groups and we
> believe it can be defeated.
>
> We do not know when the direct access legislation will be adopted.  We
> hope within the next month.  We will keep you advised, and please feel
> free to call for an update at any time.
>
> Mike Day


Forestweb (http://www.forestweb.com)
Exclusive analysis across the entire forest products industry:

**
PLUP: Sept. papermaker pulp consumption jumps in Europe; stocks continue up

**
LOGS: Western-region demand for whole-log chips continues to wane

LUMBER: Ford apologizes for anti-wood ads, agrees to run pro-wood messages

PAPERBOARD: U.S. containerboard holds positive signs despite shaky September

**************
Visit Forestweb today and sign up for a NewsBeat membership.
http://www.forestweb.com/newsbeat
--


Thanks for the help Dan.  I didn't know if Jeff was in today or not.  I will
forward Jeff's version to you for reference purposes.   I think the best
course of action is to mark up their form with the changes we would need and
add whatever you think is necessary.  Then we'll just e-mail it back to them
for comments.  It seems to me they are trying to drag their feet, so if we
can push them a little that would be great.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl                           11/29/99 10:57 AM

To: George McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement/Privileged and Confidential

George,
 I am not sure what language Jeff had proposed; however, I would note that 5
years from disclosure is too long.  I would suggest that the period be
shortened 3 years from the date of  the agreement or 2 years from
disclosure.  The choice of law as New Jersey is also a problem, I would
prefer Texas or New York.  Also, the correct name for ENA is Enron North
America Corp.  Please let me know how you want to respond to their draft of
the document.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George McCormick                           11/29/99 09:04 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement/Privileged and Confidential

Dan,
Can you compare this CA sent to us by PSE&G to the standard one Jeff had sent
them?

Thanks,
George
---------------------- Forwarded by George McCormick/HOU/ECT on 11/29/99
09:03 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey T Hodge                           11/24/99 01:24 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement/Privileged and Confidential

Dan, you may have to help George with this while I am away.  Thanks, Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 11/24/99 01:23
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George McCormick                           11/23/99 05:53 PM

To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement/Privileged and Confidential

Jeff,

I just received this.  I thought you would like to look it over with me.

Thanks,
George
---------------------- Forwarded by George McCormick/HOU/ECT on 11/23/99
05:53 PM ---------------------------

"Carretta, Kenneth R." <Kenneth.Carretta@pseg.com> on 11/23/99 04:15:54 PM
To: George McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Wohlfarth, David W." <David.Wohlfarth@pseg.com>
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement/Privileged and Confidential

Mr. McCormick,

As the request of Dave Wohlfarth, I am forwarding to you a proposed form of
confidentiality agreement to govern the exchange of  confidential
information in connection with a proposed transaction between PSE&G and
Enron.

      Kenneth R. Carretta
      Assistant General Solicitor

 <<condientiality ENA.doc>>

 - condientiality ENA.doc


Steve and Rick,

Please find attached the SoCal IM excerpts relating to regulatory issues.  I
will forward the response we have received from Tozzini's firm relating to
CEG/Riogas, Elektro, the two Gaspart entities.

Regards,
Donnie Roark

-----Original Message-----
From: Roark, Donnie
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 1:26 PM
To: George, Robert (Enron)
Subject: FW: Attached Files

Robert,

These are the excepts from the IM dealing with regulatory issues which we
sent to Brazil for review.  Jose Amelio Pinto stated that his firm had only
worked on a few of the deals and consequently he and his attorneys were only
able to review two of the Gaspart entities, Elektro, CEG and Riogas.  I have
been unable to get in touch with Jose Martinez de Hoz in Argentina and
Ramiro Guevara Rodriguez in Bolivia.  Shelley Barber and Randy Young are
also following up on local counsel issues, but I do not know the status of
their progress as of this afternoon.

 - Transredes - excerpt.DOC
 - BBPL - excerpt.DOC
 - Strategic overview of natural gas distribution  - excerpt.DOC
 - Riogas  - excerpt.DOC
 - Gaspart - excerpt.DOC
 - Brazilian - Power Generation Overview  - excerpt.DOC
 - Cuiaba II - excerpt.DOC
 - Elektro - excerpt.DOC
 - 167111_1.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 03/23/2000 12:16:23 PM
To: "Williams, Sue/COR" <swillia1@CH2M.com>, "Carlson, Rhonda/COR"
<rcarlson@CH2M.com>, "Barkley, Shelli/COR" <sbarkley@CH2M.com>, "Parker,
James/COR" <jparker1@CH2M.com>, "'llmorrison@earthlink.net'"
<llmorrison@earthlink.net>, "'jenniferc@asttrust.com'"
<jenniferc@asttrust.com>, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EVOLUTION

 - EVOLUT~1.GIF


All good - very busy this summer, training and managing 4 research
assistants (thanking God for my LECG and Tilden experience), finishing up my
first big project, and analysing lots of very interesting data.  Went to
Moscow and Berlin for 10 days early this month, and we just bought a house
and moved.  Yikes!

How are you?  How's school, I assume you go straight through the summer?

I'm actually going to be in CA from August 9-21; I'd love to grab lunch one
day if you're around.

Amy

>From: "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>
>To: "Amy Mezulis" <mezulis@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: New address
>Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:20:52 -0500
>
>
>
>Hey, how's married life?  How's the dog?  How's the cheese?
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


(See attached file: hpl0115.xls)

 - hpl0115.xls