:)

    I thought all you non-Floridians might like to see the new crop
    of bumper stickers floating around Florida these days ...
    from those who put the "DUH" in "Floriduh"!

    FLORIDA: If you think we can't vote, wait till you see us drive.

    FLORIDA: We count more than you do.

    FLORIDA: If you don't like the way we count then take I-95 and
    visit one of  the other 56 states.

    FLORIDA: We've been Gored by the bull of politics and we're
    Bushed.

    FLORIDA: Relax, Retire, Revote.

    FLORIDA: Where your vote counts and counts and counts.

    FLORIDA: This is what you get for taking Elian away from us!

    FLORIDA: We're number one! Wait! Recount!

    Palm Beach County:  If you're nice, we'll let you vote twice.

    Palm Beach County: We put the "duh" in Florida.

    Sign on I-95 : Florida this way 2 miles , no, that way  5 miles,
    no, wait 10...

    Pro-electorate's choice: Abort the pregnant chads.

    We, the people,  have spoken. Now shut up and listen while the
         lawyers tell us what we said.

    FLORIDA: We can't vote, but you should see us handle 15 bingo
    cards!


Mike is checking with broker.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/11/2001 08:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 577823

What's the status?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/10/2001 06:29 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 577823

This is the price Prebon quoted to Mike tonight - he'll be checking in the
morning to see what the spread should have been.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:23 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 577823

Mike Driscoll
deal 577823
Prebon shows price as $97.95 ....enpower has $79.95


I'm going to try to go to 50....day is packed, and still haven't decided when
to go to NY.....How's your day?

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/19/2000 10:14 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

are you going to that thing on 50 this afternoon?  do you have a busy day?


Tara,

When I tried to approve this request (Sheri gave verbal approval), I got
message that it had already been approved by another access approver.

Patti
x39106
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 02:32 PM
---------------------------

From:  Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT

Subject: Your approval is requested

	Security Resource Request System
Application Approval
Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because
you are listed as an approver on the original request.
			Instructions
For: 	Tori Hayden
Request	Original:
Application Name:	EOL - Backoffice (US)
Request Type:	Grant
Role(s):	EOL- Product Data Manager
Comments:	test		Review the request in the Request section at left.
			For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following:
			Click on the name for PeopleFinder info
			See the Further Information section below
			In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as
necessary and click [Submit].

	Further Information

Requestor:			Tori Hayden/HOU/ECT
Manager:	Tara Sweitzer
Request Date:	04/19/2000 01:54:34 PM
RC #:	100243	WO #:
Company #:	0011	Priority:	Normal
General Comments:


Dan, I offer my apologies once again for the delayed response.  It would be
nice if the California energy crisis would evaporate the away gas vaporizes
under normal atmospheric conditions, so that my work load could ease
dramatically.  But, no such luck.

With respect to your modifications to 4.2(iv)(b), 4.2(v), (4.2((vi), the
definition of "Act", the changes to "Arbitration Disputes to be Arbitrated",
they are acceptable.  However, at the risk of being a nitpicker, the word
"parties" in the language added to the "Arbitration Disputes to be
Arbitrated" paragraph should read "Parties."

Also, on or before the Effective Date, it would be appreciated if the City
could receive a list of the initial contact staff members of Enron who are
located on the trade floor.

For your information, the certified copy of the resolution no. 8040, adopted
March 12, 2001 by the city council, authorizing the city manager to sign the
Enfolio contract, will be delivered in the very near future.  I could fax to
you as soon as I get a fax number.  Please omit the draft resolution and the
deleted opinion of counsel in the final dispatch to me.  If the red-line and
strike-out changes [introductory paragraph, 4.2(iv)(b), 4.2(v) and (vi),
Act, Arbitration Disputes to be Arbitrated] could be removed, that would be
great.

The City has another inquiry.  The OFO language on page 2 of Appendix "1"
suggests that Enron is not responsible for OFO-related charges if it doesn't
receive properly or timely notice of an OFO condition.  Is this so?
Further, under what conditions would the City be required to give Enron
notice of an OFO?  Finally, EFOs are not addressed in this contract.  Do the
words "or other order or notice from a Transporter" in the Operational Flow
Orders paragraph contemplate EFOs?

I'm optimistic that we can wrap this up pretty soon.  Look forward to your
response to this e-mail.  Thanks, Grant.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:36 PM
To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

Grant,
     Sorry for the delay in responding to your additional inquiries.
     7.   Re 4.2(iv)(b) - I would propose the clause to read:  "(b) file a
petition or otherwise commence, authorize or acquiesce in the commencement
of a proceeding or cause under any bankruptcy or similar law of the
protection of creditors, or have such petition filed against it and such
proceeding remains undismissed for 30 Days, provided if a petition is filed
against the Affected Party and the  Affected Party is actively pursuing all
steps to have such proceeding dismissed and provides the other party with
reasonable documentation supporting its actions to cause such proceeding to
be dismissed, then such Affected Party shall have an additional 30 Days to
effectuate such dismissal,"
     8.   Re 4.2 (v) and 4.2 (vi) -  "20 or more Gas Days" is acceptable.
     13.  I will change the definition of "Act" as you suggest.
     21.  I propose that language be added whereby the parties shall first
attempt to settle the matters to be resolved by the use of binding
Arbitration by mon-binding mediation and if that does not resolve the issue
to the satisfaction of the parties, such matter shall thereafter be
resolved by the use of binding Arbitration.  Is this an acceptable
resolution?
     22.  We cannot agree to any list of parties who are authorized to
enter into transactions under the contract.  Our position is that whoever
answers the trading phone during trading hours is authorized to bind the
company.  However, we will provide the City with an initial contact list of
the people on the trading floor whom the city can contact as of the date
the contract is signed; however, the persons who are authorized to enter
into a transaction with the city will not be limited to the initial contact
list.  Of course, the city could always attempt to contact someone on the
initial contact list.  Will an initial contact list be acceptable?

Please let me have your thoughts concerning the above.
                                                   Dan.

                    "Kolling, Grant"

                    <grant_kolling@city.palo-a        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                    lto.ca.us>                        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                                                      cc:

                    03/16/2001 05:09 PM               Subject:     RE:
Enfolio Master Firm
                                                      Purchase/Sale
Agreement

Dan, please accept my apologies for replying so late.  I was out of town
again, and am back at trying to complete 5+ days of work within 3 days.

Thanks for accepting a lot of our requests.  Let me follow up with a couple
of additional inquiries.

7.  Re 4.2(iv), please suggest language as you've indicated in sentence 2.
Anything along the lines you've proposed likely will be agreeable.

8.  Re 4.2(v) and (vi).  How about 20 days?

13. Definition of "Act."  I suggest you refer to Article 11, sections 5 and
9 of the California Constitution, to be more specific.  Section 3 is not
regularly cited as the line of authority to the best of my knowledge,
though
I can see how the language could lead  one to cite it.

21.  In California, the concept of binding mediation is not recognized, if
I
have understood our outside counsel at prior mediations in which I've
participated.  Mediation is non-binding.  As a practical matter, it can
cost
almost as much in terms of time, money and effort to proceed to mediation,
but the "rules of engagement" are not as tight as are found in arbitration.
We avoid the rigid procedures.  I believe Enron should consider this
approach at times.  Having gone through a couple, I would not recommend to
my client that we would proceed any further once the mediator makes a
proposal that's acceptable to the parties.  The cost of arbitration is not
worth it.  That's why we in California tend to prefer mediation to
arbitration.

22.  I have to insist on behalf of my client that we assemble some list.
Surely, Enron can submit a list of people that will be initially approved
to
engage in authorized transactions.  We can do the same.  We've had an
unfavorable experience with another Texas-based
energy company regarding the scope of its representative's authority.  We
don't want to litigate the issue of due authority.  That list would help
It's not a matter of the city claiming the authority to back out of the
contract, because someone arguably didn't have the authority.  There are a
ton of cases which would make it extremely difficult to make that claim.

Thanks.  Grant.
          -----Original Message-----
          From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
          Sent:     Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:13 PM
          To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
          Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
          Subject:  RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

           << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >> << File: 0071988 RESO Enron.doc
>>
          (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

          Grant,
               I have reviewed your requested changes and have made
the changes which
          do not require explanation or clarification.  Those changes
are reflected
          in the above document.  Let me go over your list of items:
               1.   I have deleted the word "DRAFT".
               2.   I have left a blank for the date within the month
of March 2001
          when the contract would be executed by the City.
               3.   I have changed the word "may" to "shall".
               4.   Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity does not fit
in a
          Deficiency Default, it is just the maximum quantity that can
be handled by
          a party at a particular point.  I do not think their is an
omission.
               5.   I have added the word "reasonable".
               6.   The procedue for how the Termination Payment is
determined is
          provided, if the City disagrees with the method and values
provided in the
          statement and is unable to convince the Company to revise,
the statement,
          then the issue is to be resolved in arbitration.  At the
point that a
          Termination Payment calculation is necessary, a long drawn
out period
          should not be necessary to attain closure.
               7.   We need to limit the duration to 30 days,  neither
party should
          be required to wait 60 days before it could accelerate the
other party's
          obligations under the Contract.  We might be able to add
language to extend
          the period if we had some documentation stating the steps
that a party was
          pursuing to cause the proceeding to be dismissed and the
other party was
          otherwise kept whole from a credit exposure.
               8.   I have kept the 30 days because 5 days is too
short a period.
          During a holiday period, one scheduling error could cover
the entire
          period.  Article 3 has language which provides a remedy for
a party if a
          scheduling default extends for more than 5 days during any
month.
               9.   The reason is because Enron Corp. is the rated
entity and no
          separate rating applies to ENA.
               10.  I have changed "a" to "the"
               11.  I have eliminated the  60 day limitation on the
duration of an
          event of Force Majeure.
               12.  This merely addressed the possibility of a
imbalance amount being
          due when a pipeline aggregates imbalances using multiple
points, and the
          language would allocated the payment based on the amount of
the imbalance
          that a particular party may have caused.  I think the
language is clear as
          written.
               13.  The definition of Act was one of the items that I
had requested
          that you review and complete as necessary so that all
appropriate statutes
          were referenced.  I am still waiting for your language.  I
started filling
          it in using language that had been provided by the City.
               14.  I added the word "reasonable".
               15.  I have made the requested change relating to
GAAAP.
               16.  This is a late payment provision and as such a
believe that the
          provision should be more than a party's rating, as such I
have kept the 2%
          over prime language.
               17.  These amounts were determined by the credit group
and any change
          needs to be discussed with that group.  BBB-  is considered
investment
          grade and I understand that Enron Corp.'s rating is BBB.
ENA is not a
          rated entity and that is why the language relates to Enron
Corp.'s rating.
               18.  The elimination of the opinion of counsel did not
change the
          requirements relating to the representations that we expect
the City to
          have made.  If the City cannot make these representations,
then we need to
          know that before we execute the Contract.
               19.  I have added the word "reasonable".
               20.  The party that has the Transport Agreement with
the Transporter
          should have the legal right to obtain the information based
on its
          contract.
               21.  It is our position that any dispute be arbitrated.
We can agree
          to meditation if we can make the outcome binding on the
parties.  I am
          willing to discuss any changed language that you might care
to offer.
               22.  We have found that personnel of both our Company
and that of our
          Customers change so rapidily that the list is not workable
and merely
          allows a party to back out of transactions it does not like
on the basis
          that the person who agreed to such transaction was not on
the list.
          Therefore , we object to any listing of approved parties who
can transact.
          We believe that each party should be responsible for the
actions of its
          employees and should stand behind any transactions that
those parties may
          enter into pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
Contract.

               I will be out of the office on Friday, but will be in
all next week if
          you care to discuss any of these matters.

                              "Kolling, Grant"

                              <grant_kolling@city.palo-a        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                              lto.ca.us>
<Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Kolling, Grant"

<grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
                              03/02/2001 03:43 PM               cc:
Kim.Ward@enron.com

Subject:     RE: Enfolio Master Firm

Purchase/Sale Agreement

           <<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

          Dan:

          First, I've attached the proposed resolution which
authorizes the City
          Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

          More importantly, I need to inform you that our senior
management has
          reviewed the referenced contract; I have been asked to
present additional
          changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration and to
raise questions
          about certain of its terms and conditions.

          Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and proceed to the
end of the
          exhibits.

          1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of the Enfolio
agreement
          which
          should be deleted.

          2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not contain
the words "1st
          of
          January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until the parties
have signed the
          contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach as of the
date it signs
          the
          contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires the City
to proffer the
          to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

          3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City (Customer)
wants Enron
          (Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic Transaction,
as defined.
          Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should be
changed to "shall."

          4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first sentence:
Buyer's Requested
          Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's failure to
Schedule the
          Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a Seller's
Deficiency Default.
          How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity fit into a
Seller's
          Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested Quantity does
not include a
          Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is the reason
for the
          omission?

          5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line 23 refers
to "reasonable
          attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys' fees."
To be internally
          consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable attorneys' fees."

          6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A statement
showing the
          determination of the Termination Payment will be prepared.
It's unclear
          whether the City is entitled to review and challenge the
determination
          before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The City
should be entitled
          to
          receive a copy of the determination and to question it
before it is
          obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please clarify,
or permit the
          City to exercise these rights.

          7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering Event will
exist if a
          bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.  Is this
(under
          bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within which one
may seek
          dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer to the 11
USC section
          that
          backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

          8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30 days" to "5
days."  The
          City
          is concerned with the number of days that Enron may be
permitted to fail to
          Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by Enron.

          9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a default by
Enron Corp.
          (ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's default in
this regard?
          Please explain.

          10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed to refer
to "the Company"
          ?

          11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the force
majeure provision
          as drafted.  It states that the parties must perform even if
a FM event
          (earthquake) would prevent either or both parties from
performing with the
          60-day period stated therein.  There is no such limitation
under California
          law in the absence of a contract provision to the contrary.

          12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron translate the last
sentence?  We
          don't understand it.

          13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why Section 3 is
referred to?

          14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add "reasonable"
before
          "attorneys' fees.

           15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP means
generally accepted
          accounting principles, consistently applied, with respect to
Company, and
          governmental generally accepted accounting principles,
consistently
          applied,
          with respect to Customer."

          16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete "two
percent over".  The
          City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City believes
the 2% over prime
          should not apply to it.

          17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What does Enron
believe the
          City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million threshold is
mentioned.  Also,
          what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an investment grade
rating?

          18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we have agreed
that the
          opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps and
warranties are being
          deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties" is
nevertheless included
          in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted, because the
City has not
          undertaken a court search as is our custom and practice
whenever we issue
          an
          opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is not ...
Party."

          19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add
"reasonable" before
          "attorneys' fees."

          20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by "to the
extent it has a
          legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

          21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We do not as a
matter of
          legal
          policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate disputes.
Is Enron
          amenable to mediation?  This process is less formal and less
costly in my
          opinion.

          22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like the
Agreement to include
          a list of employees for Company and Customer who are
authorized to trade on
          behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be added to
this section to
          this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as an
Exhibit C.

          Thank you so much for considering these issues.  There are
others which I
          hope to receive from staff next week and which I will
forward to you for
          response.

          Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be out of
town after today
          until Wednesday, March 7.

          Sincerely,

          Grant Kolling
                    -----Original Message-----
                    From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com
[mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
                    Sent:     Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:16 AM
                    To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
                    Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
                    Subject:  Re:  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
          Agreement

                     << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
                    (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

                    Grant,
                         I have incorporated the language you provided
to me in
          the attached
                    document.  I have been informed by the Corporate
Secretary's
          office that
                    they will issue a Certificate of Incumbency
showing that the
          person
                    executing the contract for ENA is authorized to
execute
          contracts for ENA.
                    No other party signs as to form or terms, however,
the
          officer executing
                    for ENA will require that the deal person and I
initial on
          the line next to
                    his signature.  I have reviewed the proposed draft
          resolution.  ENA will
                    accept the enacted resolution and will not require
that the
          City Attorney
                    issue an opinion.  If the attached contract is
acceptable,
          please print off
                    2 originals, have them approved, signed and
forward to me
          for ENA's
                    approval and signature.  Once the contract is
fully
          executed, I will return
                    one fully executed original to you for the City's
file.

          (See attached file: 0071988 RESO Enron.doc)


>From: Ethan Klemperer <eklemperer@erisk.com>
>To: "'trycooper@hotmail.com'" <trycooper@hotmail.com>
>Subject: jobs
>Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:21:53 -0500
>
>Cooper,
>
>I just got your email from my sister who says that you are working for
>Enron
>right now. In leiu of recent events, my thought was that you might be
>looking at potential opportunities for employment. Right now I am working
>at
>a risk management firm that does alot of consulting work in the energy
>field
>(our core products are related to financial services). Right now our
>biggest
>client is El Paso, but we have also done work for Enron and BP. Our
>consulting requires serious analytical and math skills (most people at the
>company are outrageously smart (most)) and good people skills. It of course
>would require moving to NYC, but alot of the work is in Texas...
>
>So anyway, if you are at all interested, shoot me your resume...I am
>getting
>alot of pressure from Ru and KT to get you to the East Coast, so let me
>know
>if there is anything I can do....
>
>Happy New Year,
>Ethan
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------
>Ethan Klemperer
>ERisk
>Main:   212.819.0170
>Fax:    212.819.0171
>Direct: 917.522.1613
>Email: eklemperer@ERisk.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


...I assume you've seen this..

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Brown, Michelle
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 7:30 AM
> To: Cherry, Brian; Berkovitz, Trista; Thomas, Dan (CGT Dir); Johnson,
> Kirk; Hall, Rich; Campbell, Walter; Lindh, Frank (Law); Anderson, David W
> (Law); Litteneker, Randall (Law); Bellenger, Geoffrey; Williams, Ray
> Cc: Lieu, Lisa; Lee, Helen C (RRQ); Stewart, John C
> Subject: Ruling, Gas Curtailment and Diverson (A.01-03-023)
>
> Attached is an OIR in the priority of service in the event of a natural
> gas curtailment or diversion.
>
>
> Michelle Brown
> Regulatory Relations Dept.
> 973-4662
>
>  <<A.01-03-023.doc>>

 - A.01-03-023.doc


Hey there!

How's it going?  I understand you guys stole one of our marketers.  That's ok, I'll forgive you.  Things are insanely boring here.  Basically we are in a wait mode, probably, I think, until February.  This is the first time in 5 years I haven't had to worry about P&L and I have to say it's pretty weird.  It's nice sleeping in though.

So supposedly we have 14 potential suitors. You've probably heard of the banks, and I've also heard Reliant is putting together a bid.  THAT would be interesting.  We laid off probably half the people in our office--pretty much all back office support and some conservation/renewable people.  Bad timing.  Plus, when we laid off Enron Broadband folks, they got a six month severance package, and EBB didn't make any money, and in fact lost a substantial amount.  Then Enron lays off people on our floor, which has made a phenomenal amount of money, and gives them basically $4,000 taxed at 48%.  Life is not fair.

It's going to be interesting to see what this does to the industry.  I think the California debacle, then Enron (now Calpine), is going to create an interesting dynamic going forward.  Credit is going to become more and more an issue, especially towards the back of the curve.  It's interesting, I remember 5 years ago the prediction was, when it was all said and done, there would be 6 big energy suppliers in the country.  Looks like it's heading that way.

So are you going to Europe?  Sounds like fun.  If it looks like we're going to be on the sidelines for a while, I might go on vacation for a couple of weeks, maybe Hawaii.

Well, I'm going to go grab a cup of coffee.  I hope everything is well with you.

Take care,

Sean


Daily Blessing
The Cross
http://www.daily-blessings.com/cross.htm

Gifts you can give all year 'round
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch41.htm

I just found a really neat site that I hope you'll all check out.  With the
holidays coming up it has a great idea for that person you don't know what to
get...but someone you think is the greatest.  It's called Unsung Hero and I
know we all have one of those in our lives..check this out and see what they
have to offer.  I ordered one today!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjunsunghero.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


[IMAGE]

SuperBowl.com Playoff Challenge -- Experience the NFL playoffs like never
before. Select a team of 8 players and follow their performance from Wild
Card week to the Big Game on Jan. 28. Maybe your team will be the big winner
come Super Bowl Sunday! Click here to play for FREE.

The tab for SportsLine's FREE Fantasy Football is being picked up by Miller
Lite, our favorite beer around here. Check them out offline at your local bar
or online with us. Grab a Miller Lite. It's Miller Time!

Half time at the Super Bowl doesn't offer you more fireworks than the savings
at Half.com.  Check out Half.com for HALF price on Music, Books, Movies &
Games!

Win The Fantasy Football Trip Of A Lifetime! Love to surf the
cbs.sportsline.com site? You could win a 4-day/3-night weekend in Florida to
attend Cris Carter's FAST Program in Florida! Click here to get started now!

Brought to you by

Sponsorship Bar
You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS
SportsLine Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these
reports please  click here

 Player Updates?NFL Reports?
 Latest NFL Player News

 Rian Lindell , K SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Lindell is a sleeper pick at kicker this week. Seattle should roll up good
numbers against the Denver defense, which has underachieved for most of the
year.

 Sean Dawkins , WR SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Dawkins has been inconsistent all year long. But the Broncos' pass defense
is one of the most vulnerable units in football, and the Seattle WR has a
chance to shine this week.

 Seahawks , DT SEA - Baja Updated 12/08/00
 Avoid Seattle's defense at all costs this week. Last time the Seahawks faced
Denver, Mike Anderson rushed for nearly 200 yards and WR Rod Smith
embarrassed them with 78 rushing yards on just three carries.

 John Carney , K SD - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Carney won't be much of a factor this week. San Diego will have a very hard
time moving the ball into Baltimore's end of the field.

 Freddie Jones , TE SD - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Jones might have a quiet outing this week. Baltimore is very aware he is San
Diego's top offensive option and will look to shut him down quickly.

 Terrell Fletcher , RB SD - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Don't expect much from Fletcher this week. The true strength of Baltimore's
defense is its ability to squash the run. The Ravens have shut down much more
decorated backs all season long.

 Ryan Leaf , QB SD - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 After an interception-filled performance last week, Leaf is in for more
problems on Sunday. The Ravens' stellar defense will surely knock him around
all day and Leaf will surely make some frustrating turnovers. Under no
cirumstances should you start him.

 Chargers , DT SD - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 The Chargers might be able to contain RB Jamal Lewis this week, but the
overworked and undermanned secondary will be torn apart by Trent Dilfer and
speedsters such as Qadry Ismail and Pat Johnson.

 Raiders , DT OAK - Matt Lenhart Updated 12/08/00
 Don't expect a solid performance from the Raiders' defense this week.
Charles Woodson will have trouble with Wayne Chrebet, and Curtis Martin might
be able to outrun the LBs on pitches and sweeps.

 Andre Rison , WR OAK - Martin Cuilla Updated 12/08/00
 The inconsistent Rison might show off his best form this week. He will be
too much for the Jets to handle on passing downs and should be a key
third-down target.

 Sebastian Janikowski , K OAK - McKay Neal Updated 12/08/00
 The erratic Janikoswki will get a good amount of chances to kick this week.
The Raiders will move the ball in the air but might sputter against the Jets
in the red zone.

 Tim Brown , WR OAK - Hunter Shively Updated 12/08/00
 Expect a big game from Brown this week. Jets CB Aaron Glenn might draw him
in coverage, and will not be able to handle him on crossing routes.

 Zack Crockett , RB OAK - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Crockett should continue to be a factor in Oakland's offense this week.
Tyrone Wheatley is battling finger and ankle problems and the Raiders may
need to use Crockett often against the Jets.

 Rich Gannon , QB OAK - McKay Neal Updated 12/08/00
 Gannon might be Oakland's most productive player this week. Look for him to
pick apart the inconsistent Jets secondary, especially with passes to Tim
Brown.

 Broncos , DT DEN - Hunter Shively Updated 12/08/00
 Denver's defense has been ripped to shreds lately and will have a lot of
trouble handling Seattle's Ricky Watters this week. Watters totaled more than
200 yards from scrimmage against Denver on Nov. 26.

 Chiefs , DT KC - Tori Kuykendall Updated 12/08/00
 The Kansas City defense has underperformed lately but might rebound against
the Panthers. Brad Hoover doesn't present much of a threat to the front seven
and the Kansas City defensive line should be able to get good pressure on
Steve Beuerlein.

 Todd Peterson , K KC - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Peterson might have one of his better games of the year this week. The
Kansas City passing game will ensure that Peterson will see quite a few
chances to kick against Carolina.

 Tony Richardson , RB KC - Top Dogs Updated 12/08/00
 Richardson will regain the starting halfback job this week. He is an
accomplished pass-catcher, but Richardson doesn't do much else and won't help
many Fantasy playoff teams advance to the next round.

 Tony Gonzalez , TE KC - The Klap Updated 12/08/00
 Another week, another big performance for Gonzalez. Look for the superstar
TE to get in the end zone one or two times against the Panthers, who will not
be able to contain him over the middle.

 Derrick S. Alexander , WR KC - Martin Cuilla Updated 12/08/00
 Alexander should post fine numbers against the Carolina secondary this week.
CBs Eric Davis and Doug Evans will not be able to keep up with him on deep
routes.

 Elvis Grbac , QB KC - Eric Bass Updated 12/08/00
 Grbac is looking healthy again and should perform well against Carolina. He
should be a solid performer for the remainder of the Fantasy postseason.

 Kordell Stewart , QB PIT - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Stewart completed a full practice Friday and reported no trouble with his
injured right leg. An MRI earlier in the week revealed no structural damage
to Stewart's knee, coach Bill Cowher said. His injury is officially listed as
a strained upper calf. Stewart is still a risky start against a tough Giants
defense.

 Jason Elam , K DEN - Hunter Shively Updated 12/08/00
 Elam should see lots of scoring opportunities this week. The Broncos will
have no problem controlling the clock and scoreboard against Seattle.

 Dwayne Carswell , TE DEN - Free Agent Updated 12/08/00
 Carswell has become a reliable Fantasy tight end recently. He should perform
well against the Seahawks, who have always been vulnerable over the
middle.

 Gus Frerotte , QB DEN - Top Dogs Updated 12/08/00
 Frerotte is an excellent choice to start this week. He should put up good
numbers against Seattle, as long as he avoids CB Shawn Springs.

 Ricky Watters , RB SEA - Rocks Updated 12/08/00
 Watters missed Thursday's practice with a turf toe injury but is expected to
play Sunday. Last time he faced Denver on Nov. 26, he totaled 203 yards from
scrimmage and scored a touchdown.

 Jeff Graham , WR SD - Martin Cuilla Updated 12/08/00
 Graham won't need dental surgery after taking a hard hit in the mouth last
week. He is listed as questionable for Sunday's game and is an extremely
risky start, especially since San Diego faces the very tough Baltimore
defense.

 Kimble Anders , RB KC - Eric Bass Updated 12/08/00
 Anders has lost the starting halfback job. Tony Richardson will reclaim that
spot, with Donnell Bennett taking over at fullback. Frank Moreau will be used
in short-yardage situations. Unless you're desperate, don't start any Kansas
City RBs.

 Steve Christie , K BUF - Hunter Shively Updated 12/08/00
 Christie was held without a point in last week's game against the Dolphins,
but don't expect the same this week against the Colts. Christie is a solid
Fantasy performer who will get his chances on Monday night in a game between
two teams fighting to stay in the playoff hunt.

 Sylvester Morris , WR KC - Eric Bass Updated 12/08/00
 Morris, who appears to be an unreliable Fantasy starter right now, told the
Kansas City Star he might be wearing down after some early-season heroics. "I
missed the majority of camp, so there's not that much wear and tear on me,
but it's still a long season," he said. "It's not so bad physically. But
every morning I get up early, earlier than I ever had to in college. In
college, you could schedule your classes. I never had a class before 10
o'clock. Now I'm (at the practice facility) by 8 every day. That's a
difference."

More Updates

 Rosters?Teams?

 [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
 Eric Bass
 Eric Bass

  Player
  TM
  Pos
  Status
  Next
  Bye
  Wild
  FA Bid
  McNabb, Donovan
 PHI
 QB
 Active
 @CLE
  Week 16
 ?
 ?
  Smith, Robert
 MIN
 RB
 Active
 @STL
  Week 4
 ?
 ?
  Allen, James
 CHI
 RB
 Active
 NE
  Week 9
 ?
 ?
  Horn, Joe
 NO
 WR
 Active
 @SF
  Week 5
 ?
 ?
  Harrison, Marvin
 IND
 WR
 Active
 BUF
  Week 3
 ?
 ?
  Hayes, Donald
 CAR
 WR
 Active
 @KC
  Week 4
 ?
 ?
  Nedney, Joe
 CAR
 K
 Active
 @KC
  Week 4
 ?
 ?
  Ravens
 BAL
 DT
 Active
 SD
  Week 14
 ?
 ?
  Grbac, Elvis
 KC
 QB
 Reserve
 CAR
  Week 6
 ?
 ?
  Anders, Kimble
 KC
 RB
 Reserve
 CAR
  Week 6
 ?
 ?
  Davis, Terrell
 DEN
 RB
 Reserve
 SEA
  Week 9
 ?
 ?
  Morris, Sylvester
 KC
 WR
 Reserve
 CAR
  Week 6
 ?
 ?
  Robinson, Marcus
 CHI
 WR
 Reserve
 NE
  Week 9
 ?
 ?
  Lions
 DET
 DT
 Reserve
 @GB
  Week 7
 ?
 ?

Total Active Players: 8
Total Reserve Players: 6

  NFL Injuries for Eric Bass

  Updated
  Player
  Team
  Pos
  Injury
  Expected Return
 11/29/00
  Davis, Terrell
 DEN
 RB
 Leg
 Will wear a boot for three weeks and his season may be over
 12/4/00
  Robinson, Marcus
 CHI
 WR
 Back
 Out for the rest of the season

Copyright 2000 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site is always at http://football.commissioner.com/ene

FB10SP


Chris,
I am sorry to keep bring this account up.  Thank you for the price change.  I
have all the months corrected; however, Akzo got invoice incorrectly for
February, March and April.  The coordinator who invoice them use the January
NGI index price instead of the correct month index.  The amount they owe ENA
is $17,561.05.  ENA owes them (7,922.93) for some volume allocation for
December 2000.  So the net amount they owe ENA is $9,638.12.
I need to invoice them for the incorrect NGI index used and also to give them
back the credit owed to them.   Let me know if this is ok with you.
isabel

PS I promise this is it.


peter, please see below. would like the lawyers  to see and then we can
redline v your draft.
do you have ucc run to confirm not pledged now?
gerald, can you confirm that now all in et gas as peter has heard it is?
assume you are ok with protective ucc filed on our part too.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


The website containing all of the documentation created at the ASE is now
available on our intranet.  Instructions for launching the site are below.
This website contains the working documents created during the three day
DesignShop.  It is organized chronolgically by the various activities we
completed during the event.  Each section contains the assignment, team
lists, the hypertiles used during the team report-outs and a transcript of
the report outs.  The Executive Summary document you should have already
received and a bibliography of the articles used during the External Scan are
also included.

As a participant, you may find these working documents to be helpful.
However, those who were not participants in the session do not have the
context within which the conversations and work were conducted.  Therefore, I
encourage you to be prudent in the distribution of this information as it may
be misinterpreted.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

From Internet Explorer go to the SAP intranet site:  http://sap.enron.com

Click on the link "SAP Secure Site" from the bottom of left menu.
 Enter "aseoffsite" as the Username
 Enter "designshop" as the Password Both username and password are case
sensitive


Market Message: At 2141 PST, WACM requested coordinated operation of
controllable devices for USF mitigation on Path 30.  Path schedules are 188
MW, actual flows are 570 MW. Path transfer capability is 581 MW.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 09:09
PM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
10/08/2000 09:15 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Physical

Let's begin rolling out the cash products at 7:15 am.  We should also get
back to the cash strategy of the desk each morning.  Let's start testing the
market, find the support and resistance each day.  It would be nice to have
EOL change the stack manager so that we can switch a product from manage
market depth to last trade is mid with the click of a button, and not go
through the product properties.  I'll call them tomorrow.

Let's also decide on a time to close the products each morning.  We want to
send the message of reliability, but also allow our Ops group to balance and
nom.  I want to begin trading the next day cash by 11:01 am every day.  This
would stay active until 4:00.

The push is for PHYSICAL.  Our edge over the market will be phys.  From risk
to the ability to nominate and invoice, the other platforms will never see it
coming. What are the chances that ICE and espeed will deal with el paso
flows?  If information is the reason for EOL, then this will provide it.  It
all seems so simple - Fixed priced physical, just when you thought it was old
economy.  The reliable indices to big position trading to EOL market share,
all benefit under the new mantra.

Mike


Please find attached the following article:
'New rules raise push-up costs for on-site CHP' - The Engineer

Kind Regards,
Kuldeep Chana


Sorry I didn't get back to you in response to your voice-mail.  I was hoping
I could talk to Carol and Sara to see if anyone remembers why we incorporate
the Credit Support Documents by reference.

Regarding the cross-default, we usually do not expand the definition since we
don't want to bring in other derivatives transactions - of course that was
before we started doing derivatives under various master agreements with the
same entities.  It may be time to revisit this one.

	Paul Simons
	05/26/2000 11:46 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA - Cross Default

Mark

As mentioned at our trading meeting on Tuesday, we are putting together a
tailored ISDA schedule for our banking counterparties with which we propose
to trade credit transactions.

One issue we have revisited is whether the definition of Specified
Indebtedness (which ties into the cross default provisions) should be
expanded to cover derivatives transactions as well as the more conventional
bank borrowings.

We think there are arguments both ways on this, but wonder whether we have a
"house view".  Since the definition is not expanded in our standard ISDA
schedule, we assume that our preferred position is to exclude derivatives
transactions from the cross default provisions of the ISDA.

Perhaps we can discuss this when you have a spare moment! Thanks

Kind regards.

Paul


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042002.txt


Davis trying to spin out of energy crisis
Energy advisers have ruthless reputation
Ken Garcia
Saturday, June 23, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/06/23/M
NN116485.DTL
No matter how much you try to spin the facts, the truth usually topples out.
This will explain why Gray Davis is suffering from a reality blackout,
because no one spins harder or faster than our opaque leader, who, quite
equitably, is suffering his own power crisis.
Why Do You Think They Call Him Gray has an unrelenting black-and-white
problem. How can he explain away his indecision in grappling with the energy
crisis sooner, his inability to hammer out a deal with the utilities and
power suppliers before they had the state handcuffed and his frantic response
to spend $40 million in public funds to purchase future electricity without
offering consumers the details of the pact?
The truth is, he cannot, although he has tried mightily. And to that end he
made one of his biggest mistakes yet -- no small feat when you consider he is
at the center of one of the sharpest economic tailspins in California's
history.
Rather than tackle the issues head-on, Davis did what he has always done: use
consultants and polling data to try and navigate the minefield of public
opinion to put himself in the best possible light and blame others for his
problems. It's a game Bill Clinton perfected but at which the governor is a
mere weekend hobbyist.
Davis' decision to hire two former Clinton-Gore spin doctors to explain away
his role in the energy crisis has been as predictable as this summer's threat
of rolling blackouts. If only, in this case, he could have kept his critics
in the dark.
While the state's taxpayers were hit with record electricity bills, Davis was
pointing his finger at every official in the federal government who might
conceivably have played a role in the crisis and especially those power
suppliers in the Lone Star state who have been soaking California ratepayers
dry.
It is obviously true that the Bush administration has been reluctant to help
the nation's most populous state because it voted for Al Gore in November.
And time will probably show that the power companies in Texas and beyond were
being Snopes-like in their dealings with the Golden State.
But there is no getting around the fact that Davis severely exacerbated
California's energy plight through his own inaction -- as evidenced by our
sweltering soul mates in San Diego who were experiencing blackouts and
spiraling electricity costs early last summer.
Yet why suffer the facts when it's so much easier to just scramble them?
When the energy crisis hit its peak this spring and Davis' popularity ratings
began short-circuiting, he brought in Chris Lehane and Mark Fabiani, who had
been as ubiquitous in the scandal-ridden Clinton administration as the stain
on a certain intern's dress.
The pair became so adept at parrying the thrusts of truth directed by the
press each day that they earned the label "masters of disaster" -- which may
be why Davis thought of them when he considered the calamity beginning to
envelop him. If only he had considered the accompanying stink.
Lehane and Fabiani are considered by the political cognoscenti as nothing
less than ruthless, partisan hired guns, happy to attack anyone standing
between them and a monthly paycheck.
Unfortunately for Davis, the rhetorical hit men's salaries are being paid by
California taxpayers, who are none too happy that they will be socked with
billions of dollars in extra energy charges as a result of Davis' lack of
leadership.
So although Lehane and Fabiani's $30,000 monthly consulting fees may look
paltry to a governor who has contributed to California's lost billions, it
looks quite a bit different to those little people in the bleacher seats,
sometimes known as California's 30 million-plus residents.
The hiring of the disaster duo has led to a lawsuit by an anti-tax group from
Sacramento that alleges Lehane and Fabiani are violating the state Political
Reform Act because the gunslingers have also worked for Southern California
Edison as consultants -- a generally accepted no-no for public officials,
even those who worked in Washington.
And State Controller Kathleen Connell, a fellow Democrat, has rightfully
refused to pay state funds for the Clinton-Gore castoffs, because she said it
is inconceivable that the two men are working on state policy -- not politics
- - as required by law.
Until obfuscation and misdirection become part of the official state code of
ethics, it's fair to say Connell is on pretty firm ground. Or as one member
of a tax protest group put it: "We are adding insult to injury to have the
governor who feels the pressure of this crisis to spend this kind of dough
for damage control."
Damage control is not supposed to incite more damage, but right now Davis is
a metal helmet in an electrical storm. His arrogant treatment of state
voters, his refusal to shoulder responsibility and his efforts to spin his
way out of trouble has left even die-hard Democrats searching for a more
palatable replacement.
That decision will come next year when Davis is up for re-election. And the
millions of people who chose him because he seemed a safe but dull choice
will now realize that there is little solace in gray areas.
Since the governor is involved, it seems apt to call it a cautionary tale.
But by the time the spin doctors are through, it may start to sound more like
an urban legend.
You can reach Ken Garcia at (415) 777-7152 or e-mail him at
kgarcia@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 13


Looks like a full slate; you're off to a great start.
Maureen -- please put times and locations on my calendar as an fyi.

Sarah Palmer@ECT
01/05/2000 02:24 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: 2000 eSpeak Schedule

Steve:

Attached are the eSpeak events currently scheduled for 2000.  Please review
at your convenience.

Have a great day!

The eThink Team


Deborah,

I think when I "left" Enron I was removed from the mailing list, so I don't get Belden's general emails.

Thanks


Telestrategies is offering more seminars early this year that you might find
helpful - telecomm for non-engineers, telecomm taxation, federal telecomm and
others.

http://telestrategies.com/under/understanding.htm


See end of first paragraph.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001
12:33 PM ---------------------------
From: Joe Hartsoe on 06/07/2001 12:26 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stanley Horton/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Drew Fossum/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Kilmer/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: FERC Staff Concerns on the Gas Side

Folks --

Had a good discussion with a Senior Staff member at FERC in preparation for
the Pipelines Outreach meeting next week.  He told me that the two issues on
the gas side that are of primary concern to the Commission are 1) Marketing
Affiliates and potential abuse on the pipelines (Think El Paso); and 2) the
failure of CFTC and/or SEC to more closely oversee derivative trading.

Apparently, staff is considering whether to ban all transactions by marketers
on an affiliated pipeline, and some form of filing/reporting requirement to
better understand the derivative market.  Due to a lack of information, some
at FERC are assuming the worst.

I believe these proposals are in the formative stage and have not been
presented to Senior Staff or Commissioners as a recommendation.  I think
Staff would appreciate some information (ammo) to refute the need to further
regulate marketing affiliates or delve into derivative trading.

INGAA filed comments and a study concerning Marketers' use of affiliated
pipelines in response to the Marketing Affiliate Conference at FERC.  These
are attached.   Staff questions whether the underlying information remains
accurate.  We are considering whether to update the underlying information
used in the INGAA Study and how best to address these issues (probably during
Q&As) during the Staff Outreach.

I believe it would be helpful to put back together the coalition that Leslie
Lawner used at the last Market Affiliate conference to request a meeting as
part of the current Staff Outreach to discuss Staff's concerns.  In addition,
I think it would be helpful to request a separate ENRON meeting with Staff to
discuss how the derivative market works and why FERC does not need to
establish ongoing reporting requirements or otherwise become involved in
these markets.  Unfortunately, in this meeting we would probably be asked
about our involvement in the El Paso Merchant Transportation deal into
California, in light of Peggy Hegg's comment on the Frontline Show that El
Paso hedged some of the risk with Enron.

We can discuss further on Friday's call.  Later Joe


Mac,

 Thanks for the research report on EOG.  Here are my observations:

  Gas Sales 916,000/day x 365 days = 334,340,000/year

  Estimated Gas Prices $985,721,000/334,340,000= $2.95/mcf

  Actual gas prices are around $1.00/mcf higher and rising.

   Recalc of EPS with more accurate gas prices:
  (334,340,000 mct X $1/mcf)/116,897,000 shares outst = $2.86 additional EPS
X 12 P/E multiple = $34 a share

 That is just a back of the envelope valuation based on gas prices.  I think
crude price are undervalued by the tune of $10/share.

 Current price 37
 Nat. Gas 34
 Crude  10

 Total  81

 Can you take a look at these numbers and play devil's advocate?  To me this
looks like the best stock to own Also can you send me a report on Calpine,
Tosco, and SLB?

Thank you,

 Phillip


ENA's list of Appalachian Producers, Contracts, Deals, Pipes, Points


----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2001 04:48 PM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> 04/26/2001 04:42 PM 	   To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>, <ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: FERC Orders on CA and RTO West

Attached are the FERC Orders on California and RTO West, as discussed on today's Power Marketers conference call.  They will be posted on FERC's website shortly, at www.ferc.fed.us.

Attachments

 - rt01-35-000.PDF
 - 4-25 order.PDF


This request has been pending approval for  11 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078941&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078941
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:56 AM
Requested For       : punit.rawal@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Greetings WellesleyTeam!!

I would like to first take the time to thank everyone for there dedication
and support.  We extended 7 offers and we had 3 accepts, 1 decline, and 3
outstanding.

Now, it is time to prepare for the Spring recruiting season.  Below I have
attached the team strategy for the Spring recruiting.  Please review the
strategy and if you have a conflict with the event you are scheduled for
please call or e-mail me immediately so that I can find a replacement.

Thanks, Geynille


Dave,

Here is a Master draft for PSC of NM.  Please let me know if you need
anything further.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


steve-

you up for getting lunch today?


Forgot Saguoro (sold it last week)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:36 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Still got some bits to fill in

but here is where we got to.

 << File: ENA_Oct'01.ppt >>


So far I have not received comments from anyone on the attached.
If you think it would be productive to get everyone together (possibly as
early as Friday?) for about an hour to discuss capacity options, I will set
up a meeting.   Please let me know one way or the other.
Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/28/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/21/2000 12:41 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON,
Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Capacity Options on TW

Attached is a preliminary draft of a filing for capacity options on
Transwestern.  The attachments include a filing letter, proposed tariff
language and a proposed form agreement.

Obviously there are still quite a few details to be worked out.  I am
distributing a draft at this early stage in hopes of initiating a dialogue
about the larger issues first.  A few that come to mind are whether we want
to commit to selling options online, how best to explain or justify the
option fee, and what specifically in the industry has changed such that FERC
should depart from existing policy and allow TW to essentially reserve future
capacity for shippers.  Please let me know your thoughts on these and any
other issues.

I would prefer to wait to discuss comments on wording, other conforming
changes to the tariff, and other comments concerning form until after we have
resolved the substantive issues.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:36 AM ---------------------------

"KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net> on 11/09/2000 10:36:36 AM
To: <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Get out the Vote

Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu02.email.msn.com
[207.46.181.18]) by gpwise01.cfisd.net; Thu, 09 Nov 2000 09:08:26 -0600
Received: from default - 63.28.143.245 by email.msn.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC;  Thu, 9 Nov 2000 06:57:54 -0800
Message-ID: <001a01c04a5d$86304c20$f58f1c3f@default>
From: "hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
To: "Steph and MO" <headbergms1@home.com>, "Stacy Warren"
<swarre02@coair.com>, "Sheri Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Shane Herzog"
<SHERZOG@ridgways.com>, "Ron Jones" <jonesr@tpi-sourcing.com>, "Rochelle
Smith" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Rick Couvillon"
<julierickcouv@hotmail.com>, "Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>, "Matt Frazier"
<fraz2girls@ev1.net>, "Len" <bigusdickus70@hotmail.com>, "KRISTI GIRON"
<KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "John Schmitz" <jschm@telxon.com>, "Jim Miller"
<jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Janine Gregor" <janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Jim Henness
\(E-mail\)" <jhennes@c2i2.com>, "Diego Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>,
"Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>, "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>,
"Ben Schulein" <advantage@infovia.com.ar>, "Ben & Phyllis Tobias"
<benandphyllistobias@compuserve.com>, "Barbara Denson" <bbdenson@pdq.net>
Subject: Fw: Get out the Vote
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:58:25 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C04A2B.384885E0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Return-Path: hollyw@email.msn.com

Thats adorable!!

----- Original Message -----
From: <raymond.paterson@dfait-maeci.gc.ca>
To: <gonzalo@loadmedia.com>; <hollyw@email.msn.com>;
<Paul.Steed@glencore-us.com>; <TRatchford@webtonetech.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:22 AM
Subject: Get out the Vote

>
>
>
> Don't open in your cube
>
>
>

 - att1.jpg


Dear Mr. Derrick:

	Thank you for your e-mails.  It would be wonderful if we did get a chance
to meet in person while you're in Austin - whether you're here in
connection with this upcoming Law School Foundation meeting or here later
on for some other reason.

	Of course, at a minimum, I hope to be able to come to the
to-be-newly-scheduled meeting of the Institute for Law & Technology and
meet you there.  Yesterday, I received the 10/29/01 memo from David
Ellwanger and the accompanying binder.  There is a reference on page 27 of
the binder to a preliminary plan for the Institute that has been developed
by David Winn.  Would it make sense for this preliminary plan to be
circulated to committee members ahead of time?

	Incidentally, I read this morning of Bill's election to Enron's board - as
you know, he is outstanding.

	Best regards.

							- Henry Hu

Henry T. C. Hu
Allan Shivers Chair in the Law of Banking and Finance
University of Texas School of Law
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
U.S.A.

office phone:  512-232-1373
e-mail:  hhu@mail.law.utexas.edu


Hi, Greg!

Wendy Conwell in Credit here in Houston forwarded this worksheet to us to prepare an omnibus confirmation for a deal between ECC and Atco Electric.  Since you guys are preparing confirms up there, I am forwarding the worksheet to you to prepare.  Francisco Pinto-Leite is marking up the counterparty form of guaranty and will forward it to you also.

Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Thanks!

Marie
x33907

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Conwell, Wendy
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Law, Michael; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Bradford, William S.; Brown, Kortney; Ngo, Tracy; Radous, Paul; Rance, Susan; Sacks, Edward
Subject:	ATCO Omnibus CW - HIGH PRIORITY***

Please find attached the credit worksheet with credit terms to be incorporated into the financial Omnibus confirmation for financial deals done between ECC and Atco Electric.  Please note, these deals were done today pending credit and the confirmations are waiting to go out to the counterparty.  I have already spoken to Francisco about it so please forward the necessary documentation to him AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Thanks so much for all your help!

As always, I greatly appreciate it!
Wendy


Dear Vanessa,

I know our meeting to discuss putting trading offices on the web site keeps
moving, but here is what we receive from London which represents Enron Europe
information.  We should put this on the site.  I also have a list of all
trading offices world-wide.  At some point, I'd like to merge the two.

Best regards

Shona
---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 10/27/2000 09:25
AM ---------------------------
Matthew Landy @ ECT   10/27/2000 09:06 AM

To: Rob Sexton/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Ralph Jaeger/FRA/ECT@ECT, Stephane Hue/LON/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron,
Anthony Key/LON/ECT@ECT, Anna Rafalska/WAR/ECT@ECT, Bogdan
Diaconu/LON/ECT@ECT, Paulino Martinez Bernal/MAD/ECT@ECT, Berit
Lokken/OSL/ECT@ECT, Tiong Hock Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Office summary

Minor changes....

	From:  Rob Sexton                           23/10/2000 18:54

To: Ralph Jaeger/FRA/ECT@ECT, Matthew Landy/OSL/ECT@ECT, Stephane
Hue/LON/ECT@ECT, Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan-Erland
Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron, Anthony Key/LON/ECT@ECT, Anna Rafalska/WAR/ECT@ECT,
Bogdan Diaconu/LON/ECT@ECT, Paulino Martinez Bernal/MAD/ECT@ECT, Berit
Lokken/OSL/ECT@ECT, Tiong Hock Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Office summary

All

Please could you all have a look at the attached monthly report - it has
changed format this month (as has the key).  Please could you update the
colours, comments and staff numbers in your respective regions where relevant
asap.  A final draft is due by the end of this week.

Many thanks for your assistance

Best regards

Rob


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000
08:23 AM ---------------------------

Shauncy Mathews
10/05/2000 08:03 AM
To: Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For you ....

---------------------- Forwarded by Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000
08:01 AM ---------------------------

	Elida Aguilar @ ENRON

	10/04/2000 11:34:18 AM

To: Lori Boutte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna Ruff/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valerie Villareal/HOU/EES@EES, Denissa
Arredondo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Littlejohn/Corp/Enron@Enron,
julia.guzman@photomask.com
cc:
Subject: For you ....

----- Forwarded by Elida Aguilar/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 11:33 AM -----

	Patricia Flores <PFlores@corestaff.com>
	10/04/2000 11:12 AM

		 To: "'Alicia Contreras'" <acontreras@appleorthodontix.com>, "'Alton Jr.'"
<ajn114@hotmail.com>, "'Brittney Gonzales'" <critter315@aol.com>, "'Carli'"
<carli.smallwood@broadwing.com>, "'Dave'" <odin27@webtv.net>, "'Diane
Casares'" <cas3355@aol.com>, "'Ehren Moreno'" <emallstar@aol.com>, "'Elda'"
<eldaniecie99@cs.com>, "'Elmontre Williams'" <elmontre.williams@chron.com>,
"'Eric Moreno'" <moreno555@aol.com>, "'Felecia Victor'"
<felecianash@hotmail.com>, "'Larry Flores'" <hckd6190@aol.com>, "'Lety
Cardenas'" <lety.cardenas@chron.com>, "'Lila Aguilar'"
<elida.aguilar@enron.com>, "'Linda Lee'" <linda.lee@bankofamerica.com>,
"'Nancy Hinojosa'" <nancy.hinojosa@chron.com>, "'Rosa Flores'"
<r33petal@aol.com>, "'Roxanne'" <roxanne.leonard@broadwing.com>, "'Ruben'"
<rloredo_iii@hotmail.com>, "'Sooky'" <sookym@aol.com>, "'Stacie Saldivar'"
<stacie.saldivar@chron.com>, "'Yeda Ramirez'" <bheiman@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Yeda Ramirez'" <bheiman@worldnet.att.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: For you ....

 - WISHES1.ppS


My husband and his friends want me to inquire more about your fishing lodge
and prices.  A bunch of them turn 50 next year and are thinking of going on a
fishing trip.  Can you give me any more information on prices and
availiablity for next year.  Please advise what is included in the price and
where we  need to fly into.  If you have any brochures, canyou send them to
me at Jane Tholt, 7502 Highland Farms Rd., Houston, TX 77095  .  Hope you
have a great day and it was great seeing you.


Hi Vince and Molly.
Here attached is one candidate who is particularly interested in having his
profile sent to Vince...he is going to be traveling to NY from the UK soon
for 2 wks.
He specifically asked my partner at RobertWalters in the UK to investigate
Enron through my new relationship with you guys. He would be Howard Haughton,
attached below (CV).

The other 2 resumes are my students at the University of Michigan. Howard Lin
received a 4.0/4.0 for his last term and will be willing to do whatever it
takes to intern at Enron for June- Aug. I have his picture included as well.
The second is Sung, they are friends. Howy will be done expected in May 2001
and Sung in May 2002. They are my favorite interns and I expect they can be
cultivated to the Enron culture with no real cost to you (a "test drive
before committal. I have agreed to represent them and
shall take ownership, as they become graduate candidates upon their degree
completion.

I hope these attachment can represent my value and commitment to quality of
talent to Enron.

Thank you for your acceptance.
Best wishes for the weekend.
Jeff

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *

 - 00343938alec.doc
 - SUNGVINCE.doc
 - HOWARDAGENT9498132241.doc
 - howardlin.gif


Steve,

I am calling Anjam to give him a deadline regarding move to Houston.
If he decides to stay in Houston, you should meet with him to convey
the concerns regarding his performance.

Vince

Steven Leppard
10/13/2000 03:50 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharad Agnihotri/LON/ECT@ECT, Zimin
Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Support for Exotica

All

Sharad's investigations of Exotica's status in London have turned up a very
confused state of affairs. This isn't being helped by the fact that:
1. Anjam is rarely at his desk, and can't be found anywhere in the building.
2. When he is around he isn't willing or able to provide all the information
Sharad might need to support Exotica.
This is worrying since much of our business depends on the validity of
Exotica's valuations.

Sharad will now request information from Anjam via email to leave a trail,
and I want to alert you to the fact that Sharad will be cc'ing you in on
these emails.

If things don't improve soon, I may need to request some assistance in
extracting this information from Anjam.

Many thanks,
Steve


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	PNR/IDD Meeting  Room 39C1

Date:		8/21/2000
Time:		2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Mike, I want to see the final costs before determining.  My understanding is
that there is still significant expenses outstanding.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
07:41 PM ---------------------------

Mike J Miller
07/06/2000 04:29 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Peaker Fee

EE&CC has forwarded the peaker fee ($9.1 MM) invoice to ENA (see at bottom).
I have sent a return e-mail to Gavin Gaul and John Normand explaining that
final approval of this invoice will be from you.  Amy and I are waiting for a
better breakdown of overhead charges on acceleration change orders.  Once we
have the overhead issue framed out, I would then battle the fee, especially
on Wilton Center, on a packaged basis with the overhead charges.

As per the Wilton Center fee, I reviewed all of the e-mail rhetoric regarding
who is to blame for the massive construction cost overruns.  EECC/NEPCO's
cupbability lies in their insistance from day one that Wilton Center could
and would be built non-union.  It was only after ENA forced the decision in
late June 1999 to build the job union (to avoid air permit intervention) that
EECC/NEPCO even began to deal with how to build the job in a union
environment.  Even at that point, EECC/NEPCO would not move off of building
the job on a cost reimbursable basis and did not properly consider other
alternatives such as fixed unit pricing (fixed price per unit quantity
installed).  EECC/NEPCO claimed that they did not have enough time to
negotiate with the unionsor pursue other options.  However, because of their
insistance to go non-union, they precluded the ability to negotiate until the
decision to go union was made.  According to our labor experts, breaking off
union site negotiations and building non-union is worse than just going
non-union from the start.  In any event, if you need more detail on this
subject prior to discussing the fee with Larry Izzo, please let me know and I
will summarize the key points.

I will continue to work with Amy Spoede to tie down the remaining cost and
overhead issues.  If you need me to do anything else, please let me know.

Regards,

Mike Miller
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 11:11
AM ---------------------------

Gavin Gaul@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/05/2000 05:34 PM
To: Amy Copeland@ECT
cc: Robert Miesen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, nickv@nepco.com,
DavidG@nepco.com, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Peaker Fee

Amy,

Attached is the invoice for the 2000 Peaker fee.  All punchlist items should
be completed next week, weather permitting.

Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 05:35 PM ---------------------------

Robert Miesen
06/30/2000 11:59 AM
To: Gavin Gaul
cc: Cameron Best/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Peaker Fee

Gavin,
Attached below is Nepco's invoice for the 2000 Peakers fee.  If you approve,
please forward to Amy Spoede (formerly Copeland).

Thanks,
Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Miesen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
06/30/2000 11:59 AM ---------------------------

Rickg@nepco.com on 06/30/2000 10:29:38 AM
To: Robert.Miesen@enron.com
cc: NICKV@nepco.com, DavidG@nepco.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com

Subject: Peaker Fee

 <<Peakers-Fee.PDF>>
Rob
Attached is the invoice for the Fee for the Peakers.

 - Peakers-Fee.PDF


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Thursday, November  08, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Wednesday, November  07, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)	Cinergy	         $23.75	         $23.25	         $23.44	+    .47	         124,000	Comed	         $24.00	         $23.50	         $23.79	+   1.59	           5,600	Entergy	         $26.00	         $24.25	         $25.38	+    .44	          22,400	Nepool	         $33.60	         $33.25	         $33.49	-   1.73	           8,800	Palo Verde	         $32.65	         $30.50         $31.85-    .15           7,200PJM-West         $24.15         $23.60         $23.81-    .57         140,800SP-15         $34.00         $29.50         $32.48-    .69          16,000TVA         $23.50         $23.00         $23.26-    .33          75,200

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


This request has been pending your approval for  5 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076886&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076886
Request Create Date : 11/20/01 12:47:06 PM
Requested For       : hai.chen@enron.com
Resource Name       : Reuters Kobra 3.5.1
Resource Type       : Applications


I've entered a mother load of comments on all the deals.  please let me know
when you validate these or what else you need.

Kimat, the exchange deals were not validated yesterday.  Did this have a big
p&l impact?  My TCO schedulers said there volumes were off by about 6 BCF.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 07:44
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/06/2000 01:04 PM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CGAS storage/exchange deal tickets for Nov-Mar

I just set up all the deal tickets for the CGAS New Power storage contract
for Nov-Mar.  We believe our agency relationship with New Power will end
effective March 31, 2001.  The deal numbers are on the attached worksheet.

I entered the following deals at a zero commodity
470563  Buy exchange
470582  Sell Cpr Storage

470587 Buy CPR Storage
470568 Sell exchange

I added about 7500 dth to deal 456379 for November and I extended it through
March 31.

I'm kinda sleepy so I probably made a few mistakes.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 07:47 AM
---------------------------

"Hector Campos" <hocampos@hotmail.com> on 08/01/2000 04:08:11 PM
To: eric.bass@enron.com, brian.hoskins@enron.hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: mullets

Check it out mullets...

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1582340641/o/qid=9651
63608/sr=8-1/ref=aps_sr_b_1_1/104-5845180-8035156

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/11/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 10/11/2000 05:31:35 PM
To: <peter.bray@att.net>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <MNelson@electric.com>,
<RSchlanert@electric.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>, <kmagruder@newpower.com>,
<Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Edison and PG&E Emergency Motions - - - ALJ Ruling Just Issued

Last week you were sent an email which discussed the October 4 emergency
motions of Edison and PG&E to modify the end of rate freeze decisions.?  On
October 5, Edison filed an ex parte request for the immediate suspension of
the effective date of portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.??On  October
6, PG&E filed its support of Edison,s request for immediate  suspension of
the effective dates of the decisions. The motions were filed  because of the
significant undercollections which are being accumulated in their  purchased
power accounts.
?
A ruling has just been issued by ALJ Minkin which directs parties to file
responses to Edison,s and PG&E,s ex parte requests for immediate suspension
of certain portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.? The judge says, "In
effect, Edison and PG&E have moved for a stay of certain aspects of these
decisions.? Consistent with Rule 45(f), responses to motions must be filed
and served within 15 days of the date that the motion was served, unless the
administrative law judge sets a different date.? Therefore, responses to
Edison,s and PG&E,s requests must be filed and served by October 20,  2000."
?
She also notes that the utilities' financial information must be provided  by
October 17 and provides that, "Parties have the opportunity to comment on
the  financial information provided by the utilities and the emergency
petitions  (including the amended petitions) by October 30."
?
This suggests that the filing due on the 20th could be primarily  procedural,
dealing with the propriety of the Commission issuing a stay of  previously
approved decisions.? The filing on the 30th would then deal with  the
substance of the emergency requests, as well as making any comments on the
financial data provided by the utilities.? This would provide more time to
review the financial data and work out the details of any "counter proposal"
which ARM might want to make.? However, we could also deal with substantive
issues in the 10/20 filing.? We should discuss this soon and determine what
course ARM would like to pursue.
?
A copy of the ruling is attached for your information.
?
Dan
 - ALJ Ruling 0f 10-11-00.doc


Good Morning Miss Dana!

You are so fresssssssssssssssssh!  It does feel good to be in a perfect
relationship.  You know there is a Scripture which talks about returning to
your
first love -Jesus.   I stand on it  often but can't remember it's location in
the Gospel.  There is another which speaks to the smell and aroma of Jesus
Christ.  That's awesome too.

Have a blessed day.  Your joy gives me a boost.  Receive God's special
goodness
for your life.

Love Ya'
Jacqueline Gayle


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000 02:03
PM ---------------------------

"Thomas Mueller" <tmueller@rhm.com.mx> on 02/14/2000 06:18:58 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: MMiranda@rhm.com.mx

Subject: Letters to GTR and AI

Kay,

attached please find for your review the draft letters

- to GTR to accelerate the Y Note,

-to AI to make a claim under the Bond in respect of the US$27MM loan, and

- to AI to make a claim under the Bond in respect of the US$5MM loan.

The amounts have to be filled in the blanks.

Best regards
Thomas

 - 7V601!1.DOC


Hey guys,

Would you please ck the Oglethorpe deal from July 2000  - Dec 2000? Is there supposed to be a cashout booked in Sitara for these months?  Oglethorpe over paid their invoice every month.  I believe that Doug told me the extra was for the cashout that was not invoiced.

Thanks
Darla


Hope Dina and the baby are doing well.

Chris


Dave,

Attached for your review, please find a clean draft of the above-referenced
Agreement.  Please note that there are several provisions which I have
highlighted for your special attention.  This Agreement will require several
additional changes after you provide me with the payment tables.  Please call
me at 3-9720 with any comments or questions.

Jason


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks44.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


What do you think we should do?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/17/2000 12:16 PM -----

	RTellis@milbank.com
	09/05/2000 12:28 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Waste Management v. GSF/Ecogas

Richard, the court has set a trial date in the Waste Management case for Feb.
16, 2001 and plaintiff Waste Management has propunded form interrogatories on
Ecogas.? Pursuant to your instructions, we have not spent any time on the
case, however,? we will need to draft some discovery responses/objections and
discuss how to deal with the trial date as it gets closer.?? Thanks.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight.  Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 8pm and may continue to be unavailable until 12 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed.  Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time.

Blackberry users:  Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes.

If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.


I just wanted to let you know that I sent this letter to Dr. Harris addresses
his concerns and stating my commitment to succeeding at The Texas Graduate
School of Business.  I hope I have done what it takes to prove that I can
succeed at the School.  Thanks again for your help and interest.

Sincerely,
Ben


bherod@enron.com and mmoscoso@enron.com.  Mike's may be incorrect, let me
know if it fails.
PL


Start Date: 1/20/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012011.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
DAMASCUS, Syria _ Pope John Paul II arrives in Syria.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Rudi- I still have a hard time visualizing the risk here, other than pure dilution, which I guess we care about. There must be a way to communicate this issue graphically or with an example presented on a well thought out spreadsheet. If you (we) don't figure out a way to communicate the problem here we have no chance of winning the battle. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipter, Rudi
Sent:	Monday, April 02, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Cc:	Port, David; Murphy, Ted
Subject:	2nd Quarter SRM recommendation

Rick,

Although ENE is now trading in the $50 range, there is an opportunity to take advantage of this downturn in our stock value.  Our Enron Stock Option Plan is monstruously short calls to employees (approximately 45 MM share equivalent in vested, exercisable options).  Over the past few years the stock has traded significantly higher, which has created a large economic loss in the form of potential stock dilution.

In recent weeks, we have worked extensively with members of Fastow and Causey's organization and have been discussing various strategies to mitigate / dampen the dilution effect.  The outstanding issues include:

1.) Banks are approaching their ENE credit limit

2.) There is a tradeoff between accounting and economic value.

We feel that the decision to hedge this program should be influenced by the implied view on the future performance of our stock.  SRM's goal is to create a proposal that will outline the costs/benefits to hedging the stock option program.  In addition, we are in the process of developing a model to identify the various decision inflection points.  My biggest concern is that we will not be able to influence senior management before the stock price begins to increase again.

I wanted to give you a head's up in case Causey and/or Fastow start discussing this issue.

      Rudi


Hello,

 An internal meeting to discuss transmission for Project Columbia has been
set for:

   Thursday, November 2
      9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m.
          Mt. Bachelor Conference Room

Agenda for this meeting:
* Review transmission documentation received from BPA
* Discuss the value of reserving the 153 MW of transmission available from
Big Eddy to NOB
* Discuss incremental cost of reserving transmission from Longview to Big Eddy
* OUTCOME: Make preliminary determination of transmission strategy for
Project Columbia

A meeting with BPA has been set for:

   Thursday, November 2
      3:00 p.m. (approx.?? Don will confirm - this meeting to follow 1:30
p.m. meeting w/ BPA and URS)
     BPA offices at Lloyd Center

Agenda for this meeting:
* Inform BPA of project size (249 MW vs. 600 MW)
* Determine path forward for transmission requests and documentation
* Discuss risks and costs of obtaining firm transmission from Longview to Big
Eddy (if Big Eddy to NOB reservation is taken)

Regards,
Laura


Twanda, please save this in whatever power point directory you have.  Then,
print for me to revise for a presentation to Energy Operations for Norma.
Save this one, though, because the one I am going to use for Energy Ops will
be much shorter, and this one has good stuff in it!  Thanks.  Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 10:21
AM ---------------------------

"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> on 04/18/2000 07:49:43 AM
To: "'mcash@enron.com'" <mcash@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: EMPLOYER PPT TRAINING FOR STERLING BANK.ppt

Michelle:

The PowerPoint presentation that you requested.  Please delete any reference
to Sterling Bank, but otherwise, this is my personal work product and you
may use it.  Let me know if you need anything else on this topic.

In addition, I will let Anne Marie know the timing issue related to the
checks.

Also, let me know what your hear from Jack.  We are disappointed that he did
not come to our firm, but it does not surprise me.

Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com

 <<EMPLOYER PPT TRAINING FOR STERLING BANK.ppt>>

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply
email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com

 - EMPLOYER PPT TRAINING FOR STERLING BANK.ppt


-____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline

**********************************************************************
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The
eDirect Network. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the
products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe
please copy and paste the following link into your web browser or
click here. http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com
**********************************************************************

Dear PATRICE,

As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Oprah! Lose 7 to 16 pounds of fat
while reversing the aging process without dieting or exercise! This
proven discovery has been reported on by the New England Journal of
Medicine. Forget about aging and dieting forever! And it's Guaranteed!

Click below for a free one-month supply!
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1326195171&m=2111010&c=811

Would you like to lose weight while you sleep!
*  No dieting!
*  No hunger pains!
*  No Cravings!
*  No strenuous exercise!
*  Change your life forever!

Click below for a free one-month supply!
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1326195171&m=2111010&c=811

1.  Body Fat Loss  -- 82% improvement.
2.  Wrinkle Reduction -- 61% improvement.
3.  Energy Level  -- 84% improvement.
4.  Muscle Strength  -- 88% improvement.
5.  Virility -- 75% improvement.
6.  Emotional Stability  -- 67% improvement.
7.  Memory  -- 62% improvement.

100% GUARANTEED!
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1326195171&m=2111010&c=811

This e-mail message may be a recurring mailing.

--____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>

The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The eDirectNetwork. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please click on the following link or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com.

As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Oprah! The health
discovery that actually reverses aging while burning fat, without
dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has even been reported
on by the New England Journal of Medicine. Forget aging and dieting
forever!
And it's Guaranteed!

Would
you like to lose weight while you sleep!
No dieting!
No hunger
pains!
No Cravings!
No strenuous exercise!
Change your life
forever!

1.Body Fat
Loss
82%
improvement.

2.Wrinkle
Reduction
61%
improvement.

3.Energy
Level
84%
improvement.

4.Muscle
Strength
88%
improvement.

5.Virility
75%
improvement.

6.Emotional
Stability
67%
improvement.

7.Memory
62%
improvement.

100%
GUARANTEED!

This e-mail message may be a recurring mailing.

--____OFFERMAIL_BOUNDARY____--


Vicky,

Please, send me your resume.

I shall forward it to a number of employees of  Enron in London
with my strongest recommendation. I shall send you  the list
of names. The resume will make it easier for me to
identify good targets.

Please, make sure you will contact me if there is no reaction.
People here are very busy and, as you know, things fall through the cracks.

Vince

Vince

"Vicky Windsor" <vjwindsor@hotmail.com> on 10/11/2000 04:49:56 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: From Vicky Windsor

Dear Vince,

How are you? Well I hope.

I hope you don,t mind me writing to you. You may remember that 5 months ago
I left Risk Publications and moved to a charity. Having been here for only a
few months, I have decided that this job is not for me (I miss the buzz of a
corporate office) and I have decided to move back into the corporate sector.

Because of my previous experience and knowledge of the energy sector, I am
very interested in moving into this area. I have always thought that it
would be great to work for Enron because it is such a dynamic company and I
am planning to approach the London office to discuss any opportunities,
which might be available. I am particularly interested in product marketing
and research, although I am very open-minded at the moment. I wondered
whether you could recommend the right person to speak to in London.

I know that you are incredibly busy, but any help you can give me would be
fantastic Vince.

Thanks and best regards,

Vicky Windsor

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Hi gang.  I want to meet tomorrow regarding the CES storage deal.

Around 1:30PM?  Let me know.

thanks


Kathy,

Here is the redline with changes previously discussed to Sections 4.2, 4.6,
and the Material Adverse Change in the Appendix.

I believe we are set for a conference call on Wednesday afternoon.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490