-----Original Message-----
From: Platter [mailto:platter.oregon@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 10:32 PM
To: KAPUSTKA, LAURA L
Subject: RE: Resume' - Phillip Platter - Enron Power Marketing

Thanks for your reply. I'll contact H.R. when I'm in Omaha next week. I look
forward to hearing from you.
THanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: KAPUSTKA, LAURA L [mailto:lkapustka@oppd.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:35 AM
To: Platter
Subject: RE: Resume' - Phillip Platter - Enron Power Marketing

Phillip -
Thanks for the e-mail.  I spoke with David Reid (Division Manager -
Energy Marketing & Trading) regarding open trading positions.  He
indicated that he has one opening for a energy marketer (shift position)
that will be posted internally first.  If he doesn't get any qualified
applicants, he will look externally.  I would suggest you contact our
Human Resources area and complete an application so a current one will
be on file.  I will watch for the position to be posted and let you know
when it is opened to current employees - that will give you an idea of
the time frame for filling the position.  Good luck!
Laura Kapustka

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Platter [SMTP:platter.oregon@verizon.net]
> Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:42 PM
> To:	lkapustka@oppd.com
> Subject:	Resume' - Phillip Platter - Enron Power Marketing
>
> Dear Ms. Kapustka,
>
> Last year I believe you had a conversation with my sister Molly Elvig
> about
> any opportunities for me at OPPD.  I got in touch with Dave Dietz ( it
> may
> have been Dave Ried) at that time and it was apparent then that there
> weren't opportunities available. Since then, I have expanded on my
> experience in the power industry with Enron in Portland, Oregon.
>
> As you may know, Enron has filed for bankruptcy which has resulted in
> very
> uncertain times for many Enron employees including myself.  While I am
> still
> employed in Enron's trading operations and believe we will be back
> trading
> as soon as we find a buyer, I have decided to seek other
> opportunities.
>
> I believe my experience at Enron, especially in power trading and
> scheduling, would provide me with a great foundation for success at
> OPPD.
>
> The past 11 months I have been trading next day power in the
> California
> market.  My primary responsibilities included making markets on
> EnronOnline
> for off peak and odd-lot power.  My average daily trading volume for
> these
> products ranged from 60 to 90 trades per day.  I also had
> responsibility for
> managing the scheduling function which had been my main focus for the
> prior
> 3  years. Much of my time has been spent analyzing the market
> fundamentals
> including plant outages, transmission constraints, gas prices,
> weather, and
> Hydro flows.
>
> Over the last 4 years in power marketing I have been involved in
> scheduling
> all trading hubs in the WSCC, including extensive experience with the
> California ISO. I also worked shifts in the real time group.  I also
> am a
> C.P.A. with experience in budgeting and earnings analysis with
> Northern
> Natural Gas Company, an Enron subsidiary.
>
> I am primarily interested in opportunities you may have in energy
> marketing
> and trading, but would consider other areas in your company. I have
> attached
> my resume' for your review and want to inform you I will be in
> Nebraska from
> December 26th thru January 3rd.  I realize the Holidays are a busy
> time, but
> if you feel it may be beneficial to meet, I would gladly arrange to be
> available. I can be reached at 503-624-7995 (home),503-464-3934(work),
> or
> 503-701-9736(cell). I have also sent this information to David Ried
> and Dave
> Kulisek.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you soon and I appreciate any
> assistance or
> advice you may provide me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Phillip Platter << File: PHILPLATTER_RES4.doc >>


I think this works for covering ENA for any HPL breach; however, I'd like to
see explicit language that requires HPL to make ENA whole in the event the
counterparty does not pay ENA.

Thanks,
Tanya

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hyvl, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Koehler, Anne; Gray, Barbara
Subject: RE: FW: Schedule 1.1(a) - Guaranty Agreements

Tanya,
 Please review the attached document regarding our conversation concerning
the back to back arrangement.  I believe the highlited information should
cover your concerns and it is the same information as was used in the CES
documents.  Please advise if anything further is needed.
 << File: 2001-006amisc.doc >>


Contract 08110 was suspended at 10/24/2001 09:32:04

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: PHIL HOCHMUTH
on LINUX
12/11/00 - Today's focus: Network management goes open source

Dear Wincenty
Kaminski,

In this issue:

* An open source contender to management platforms
* Experts Exchange
* IT Job Spot(tm): Exclusive opportunities with hot companies.

CHECK THESE OUT! Network World is now offering EIGHT NEW FREE
newsletters.  Get the latest on available IT jobs, management
strategies and how to best optimize your web site.  Sign up
today at: http://nww1.com/go/foc69.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's focus: Network management goes open source
---------------------------------------------
By Phil Hochmuth

A beta version of Open Network Management Software's Bluebird
management tool last week was released to the open source
community for testing in network environments.

Bluebird's creators intend the software to be an open-source
alternative to large network management platforms, such as
Tivoli, HP's OpenView and Aprisma's Spectrum. Bluebird uses
standards-based technologies - including Java in the core
application engine and XML in the reporting and interface
modules - which make applications less bulky and more
customizable than proprietary network management platforms,
OpenNMS developers claim.  Also, as with all open-source
programs, the source code is freely available, allowing users
to modify and customize the software even further.

Bluebird runs with PostgreSQL 7.0, a freely available SQL
database popular with open-source software users. Bluebird is
also compatible with the Oracle8i database.

Bluebird 0.4 is based on SNMP, and is designed to manage small
networks of up to 500 networked devices. The software requires
no "agents," or monitoring software, to run on the devices it
monitors. This could help to make the deployment and
maintenance of the system easier than agent-based management
products.

The Bluebird software performs an array of management tasks,
such as discovering TCP/IP devices in a network, device
filtering, and service-level monitoring for enforcing service-
level agreements from a service provider. Reporting tools allow
users to make charts and reports about their network's
performance over a period of time. The software includes a
Java2 real-time reporting console that gives users a live view
of events and traffic patterns in a network.

A calendar function is included, which can be used to schedule
network tasks, such as system backups and automated software
upgrades.

OpenNMS software is based on Java2, so it can run on an array
of platforms, including Linux, Windows NT/2000 and Sun Solaris.

OpenNMS expects Version 1.0 of Bluebird to be released in the
first quarter of 2001. The production version of the software
will have a distributed architecture, where multiple Bluebird
servers are deployed and tasks are divvied up among distributed
machines. Version 1.0 will also support networks with thousands
of TCP/IP nodes.

To contact Phil Hochmuth:
-------------------------
Phil Hochmuth is a writer and researcher for Network World, and
a former systems integrator. You can reach him at
mailto:phochmut@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Got a technical question related to new technology on your
corporate network? Post it at Experts Exchange on Fusion at
http://nwfusion.experts-exchange.com/. Another network
professional may have the solution to your problem.

Download the Bluebird software and source code:
http://www.opennms.org/files/dev_snapshot/

Also, download PostgreSQL database software:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/

Learn more about the OpenNMS project's predecessor, Neo:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/neo/

Find out about Linux network management tools from other
vendors:
http://www.caldera.com/volution/

***************************************************************
IT Job Spot(tm) presented by http://www.ITcareers.com

With LeadersOnline, your LINUX career advancement is in the
hands of recruiting professionals...not monsters. We bring
exclusive opportunities to you through our convenient web-based
search process. LeadersOnline finds high-quality, $75K-$200K
LINUX and IT positions meeting your specific requirements.
Developed by Heidrick & Struggles, the world's leading
executive search firm, LeadersOnline matches top LINUX
professionals with clients needing emerging leaders in
mission-criticalpositions. Invest 10 minutes to register
with LeadersOnline today. It's free and confidential. We'll
do the rest. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2149157;4831248;k
***************************************************************

Breaking Linux news from Network World and around the 'Net,
updated daily: http://www.nwfusion.com/topics/linux.html

Archive of the Linux newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/index.html

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account
Executive, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online
Network. IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


Attached please find the Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities'
Informal Comments on December 14, 2001 Draft Documents.

 <<Informal Jan 10 Comments to RTO West.doc>>


My brief comments are included...

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

 - timewarn.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jerry Sommer <jsommer@AspectResources.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	Otto, Charles H.
Subject:	Swap

Charlie- Here you go.
Jerry

Jerry Sommer
Aspect Resources LLC
511 16th Street Suite 300
Denver Co. 80202
303-573-7011 x262
jsommer@aspectresources.com
 - Charlie 10 24 2001.xls


This message is intended for all U.S. employees eligible for Enron's domestic
medical plans.  If you receive this notification in error, please disregard.


Yvon,

Good morning!  Attached below is a letter I sent to TECO and Mosbacher
yesterday describing how my deal benefits them.  I have offered to move some
of the elements of my deal around to help with book earnings, etc. while
maintaining PV value.

How much does it cost me to delay the start of my 50MW, $50 call option to
1/1/03 and 1/1/04.
How much do I gain by increasing the size of my remaining calls by 10mw?
How much do I gain by adding 50MW, $200 and $300 calls for the following
range of dates:

 Start Date 12/31/10 end 12/31/20 end
 1/1/03 ??? ???
 1/1/04 ??? ???

Make sure you use the base model without insurance.  This should be a good
starting point.  I'm open to any suggestions.

regards,

Don


Natural Gas Straddles

			 	Month	Strike	Bid	Offer	Volatility	Net Change
			 	X	300	exp.	exp.	#VALUE!	#VALUE!
			 	Z	320	60.5	62	0.8080	0.0330
			 	F	330	85	87	0.8034	0.0096
			 	G	330	96	98.5	0.7389	0.0090
			 	H	325	97	97.5	0.6632	0.0036
			 	J	315	83	84	0.5340	0.0045	 		Strip	Strike	Value
			 	K	315	81	84	0.4803	-0.0063	 		X/H	321	#VALUE!
			 	M	320	87	90	0.4698	-0.0012	 		J/V	280.7143	95.36
			 	N	325	92	96	0.4629	#VALUE!
			 	Q	30	99	103	0.4037	#VALUE!
			 	U	330	106	110	0.4763	#VALUE!
			 	V02	330	106	114	0.4629	#VALUE!
			 	X02	330	 	 	#VALUE!	0.0000
			 	Z02	355> 	131	134
			 	 	 		10/26/01 2:38 PM

			 	 	 		Crude Oil Straddles

			 	Month	Strke	Bid	Offer	Volatility	Net Change
			 	Z	2200	196	206	0.4902	-0.0459
			 	F	2200	330	340	0.5158	-0.0106
			 	G	2250	425	437	0.5160	-0.0051
			 	H	2250	475	485	0.4959	-0.0060
			 	J	2250	500	515	0.4670	-0.0108
			 	K	2250	525	540	0.4455	-0.0018
			 	M	2200	540	547	0.4254	-0.0009
			 	N	2200	545	560	0.4047	0.0006
			 	Q	2200	550	565	0.3870	-0.0009
			 	U	2200	555	570	#VALUE!	#VALUE!
			 	V	2200	560	80	#VALUE!	#VALUE!
			 	X	2200		 	#VALUE!	#VALUE!
			 	Z02	2200	555	570	0.1700	-0.1500

			 	 	 		10/26/01 2:42 PM


For your reference, please find attached a short presentation that we have prepared for Xcel regarding blend & extend products (a.k.a. stack & roll).  As prices continue to drop and these deals become more attractive, these slides might be useful in our customer presentations.

Please note that, since this particular presentation is for Xcel, we have included some Rockies fundies information that may or may not be applicable to other customers.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Tyrell
303 575 6478


Sophie- what do we need to do to implement this?

Vince - do you want to go through this with Steve while he's in Houston?

- Dale

Vince J Kaminski
30/08/2000 23:43
To: Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele
Small/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confidential

Sophie,

I think it's a fair deal.

Vince

Sophie Kingsley   08/30/2000 11:49 AM

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Confidential

Both,

Thanks for your comments and comparisons, it is good to get context.

Based on your comments here would be my proposal

o63,500 basic salary -
o15K kickers for each of the 2 years - These are paid as a lump sum on each
anniversary guaranteed.  Therefore guaranteed salary is effectively o78,500 -
this is completely separate and in addition to any performance bonus
Increase the value of options to o60K  to vest 1/3 as before - which leaves a
1/3 ($20,000 ) hanging out there at the end of the contract.

Just FYI - Anjam is currently on o68,000 but does not have an agreement, so
this would effectively put a 10.5K gap between the two.

Let me know your thoughts.

Dale Surbey
30/08/2000 16:09
To: Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Confidential

Sophie,

Here's Vince's comments on your proposal for Steve.  Also, what's a 2-Yr
Exec?  How do the kickers work - are they basically a guaranteed minimum
bonus or incremental bonus?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 16:10
---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
30/08/2000 14:21
To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confidential

Dale,

Thanks for your message.
I don't know the labor market  in London that well but here the market
for quants is very hot.  Steve is in my view an exceptionally talented person
and I would go an extra mile to retain  him long-term for the company.

I would adjust the base salary or the kicker upward a bit.
o62,000 Basic  is what Anjam is receiving currently  (if I remember
correctly). Steve has a much higher value
to Enron than Anjam.

Vince

Dale Surbey
08/30/2000 07:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidential

Vince,

This is the package HR is proposing for Steven.  What do you think?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 13:50
---------------------------
Sophie Kingsley   29/08/2000 20:32

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Confidential

Sorry Dale, long day, here are the proposed numbers

2 Year Exec
o62,000 Basic  ( currently o55K )
o10K each year kickers
$50,000 worth of options to vest 1/3 1/3 1/3

Let me know what you think.

Regards

Sophie


I just talked to Chris Kennedy, she informed me that Amoco will be taking down their liquids line that feeds the Wattenberg plant for the entire months of August and September.  What that means is that the gas flows into CIG at Watkins/Box Elder will be reduced.  She says by 15% but I don't know if that's entirely correct.  This hurts us on the Thermo deal, delivered to Skyline, due to the fact that these two receipt points are the only points that work on our discounted transportation.  I don't think we will have too much trouble buying DJ supplies during the peak of the summer but keep your eyes open for any Watkins/Box Elder supply.  We also need to start working CIG for a discount on other receipt points.

Paul

PS  Make sure if you are using the CIG Skyline DISCOUNTED transportation at receipt points other than Watkins and Box Elder we are requesting discounts for these additional points.  Otherwise we will be paying max rate!


Believe it or not, they have not mentioned an extension.  They figure we can
sign on Friday.

When do you want to talk?

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           04/10/2001 04:53 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann, Chris Booth
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

Kay:

I'd like to talk through the points below so I can make sure I understand the
issues. By the way, I did not agree to anything with Michael, in fact I told
him it was easier to not include any change order provisions. Have they asked
for an extension yet?

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 04:52 PM
---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/10/2001 03:49:15 PM
To: "'Chris.Booth@enron.com'" <Chris.Booth@enron.com>, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
Subject: RE: FW: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

Chris and Ben:

Since Kay is tied up on a 3:00 conference call, she asked me to summarize
the issues raised by Marguerite's latest mark-ups.  The issues are as
follows:

1. In Section 6(h) regarding the Change Order, Marguerite has added a rider
pursuant to which ENA would be required "to cause the Original Purchaser
and/or the Agent to use commercially reasonable efforts to afford NorSub (or
its agent or representative), upon request of NorSub, such opportunity or
opportunities to discuss with GE (or to consult with GE concerning) such
matters pertaining to the Turbines and/or the Original Turbine Contract as
NorSub desires to discuss with GE (or to consult with GE concerning) and
which GE is obligated under the Original Turbine Contract to discuss with
(or concerning which GE is obligated under the Original Turbine Contract to
consult with) the Purchaser and/or Agent thereunder; provided, however, that
each of ENA, the Original Purchaser and the Agent shall have the right to be
present at, and to participate in, each such discussion (or consultation."
According to Jerry DeBerry, Michael Young raised this concept with Ben, and
Ben accepted it in principle.  Please confirm if you are okay with this
rider going into the Letter Agreement.

2.  In Section 8(a), Marguerite has added a clause whereby ENA agrees to be
responsible for, and to pay GE when due, and to hold the LLC and NorSub
harmless from any damages or indemnification payments which become due and
payable to GE on and after the Closing Date as a result of any event
occurring, or any circumstance arising, prior to the Closing Date.  Since
this provision effectively shifts the Change Order risk onto ENA, Kay
suggests that we only accept the provision if a reciprocal provision is
included that allows ENA to terminate the agreement as a result of any event
or circumstance that increases the Purchase Amount.  Do you agree?

3.  Finally, with respect to the LLC Agreement, NorthWestern would like to
be able to exercise its call rights with relative freedom while forcing ENA
to wait until Takeover or 12/31/02 before being able to exercise its put
rights.  Neither Jerry nor Marguerite understands why ENA cares when
NorthWestern takes ENA out.

Jerry and Marguerite were working on scheduling a conference call for
sometime tomorrow, so I will send you an e-mail confirming the details as
soon as I hear back from them.

Best regards,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Booth@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Booth@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Young, Michael
Cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com; mreuter@kslaw.com;
Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

Michael,

We (Enron and outside counsel) have not received any documents either faxed
or via e-mail as of Tuesday morning.  Once we receive the documents, we
would like time to review the comments before we engage in a conference
call.  Please either resend the documents to Kay Mann, John Keffer and
myself.

Regards,

Chris

"Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com> on 04/10/2001 08:18:31 AM

To:   "'chris.booth@enron.com'" <chris.booth@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

Chris, in case Kay is not in today, I provide this to you.  Please forward
to Ben at your earliest convenience.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:43 PM
To: 'Kay.Mann@Enron.com'; 'JKeffer@KSlaw.com'
Cc: Young, Michael; Kahn, Marguerite R.
Subject: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

We have forwarded to you via facsimile our comments to the Letter Agreement
and the LLC Agreement. The majority of our comments, as you will note, are
intended to clarify the understanding of the parties with respect to the
various matters set forth in such documents and are not intended to "change
the deal". Except that, upon the advise of our tax counsel, we have
adjusted the amounts of the promissory notes to be issued in connection
with the transaction in order to maximize the LLC's basis in the Turbines.
We believe this is consistent with your initial draft of the Letter
Agreement.

Also, please note that we have included additional language in Section 6 of
the Letter Agreement which provides NorthWestern with the opportunity to
consult with GE on matters relating to the Turbines. This reflects our
understanding of an agreement that had been reached among the parties.

With respect to the LLC Agreement, we would like to discuss with you the
following: (i) the timing of the exercise of the Call Right and (ii) the
intent of your proposed language in Section 7 relating to the rights of
each Member to act in its own best interests with respect to the Call and
Put Rights.  To that end, we propose scheduling a conference call on
Tuesday afternoon, April 11, 2001.  Please contact me as soon as possible
with a time that is convenient for your team.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Note: We will forward to you shortly, revised drafts of the documents for
which we have drafting responsibility.

************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:     (212) 319-4090

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/09/01 20:42:52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address. Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com. In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 03:05 PM
---------------------------

Rick Buy
02/26/2001 03:01 PM
To: geir@hjyachts.com
cc:
Subject: GB 58

Thanks for the information on the GB 58. This boat far exceeds what I want.
After the show I concluded that  either a 42 or 46 foot classic is most
appropriate for my needs. Would like to also consider the 36 foot model.
Thanks for the info though and keep me in mind. I enjoyed talking to you at
the boat show and my wife was quite sold on the GB line (after looking at
most everything there in detail).

As I mentioned I am in no particular rush as I probably have a year before I
want to go forward on this but if something exciting came up, either new or
used, I may be interested. Again, I would need your help in obtaining
appropriate dockage( in someone's backyard!)

Thanks, Rick Buy


Did you revise this?  I can't find it - let's assume PAs and ETAs go out on 12th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:57 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Restart Plans

Louise,

I know this isn't "due" until the 7th, but we have been using a detailed activity list for a couple of weeks now, so here you go:

The high level subject area summary is as follows:

Activity	Date	EnronOnline person Responsible
Prepare Top customer list for marketing	Complete	Teresa Mandola
Prepare new website designs	4-Jan-02	Heather Alon
Deletion of nonapplicable content (e.g. Market Info pages)	7-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Prepare new broker client contracts	8-Jan-02	Daniel Diamond
New ETA, PA, GTC from legal	8-Jan-02	Carl Carter
Prepare marketing material designs to support new PA process	8-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Preparation of cleaned data and products	9-Jan-02	Jennifer Denny
Update of Registration Wizard	14-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Approval of ETA, PA, GTC from new buyer	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Bob Shults
Approval of website design from new buyer	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Kal Shah
Obtain Approval for new Press Release	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Kal Shah
Send out new PA's. Begin Registration Process	15-Jan-02	Teresa Mandola
Send out NetCoOnline Press Release	15-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Update of all online content for new company name	16-Jan-02	Rahil Jafry
Test bridging from NetCoOnline to new back office systems	17-Jan-02	Torrey Moorer
Approval of credit headroom calculation process from new buyer	17-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Bob Shults
Official Launch of NetCoOnline	21-Jan-02	Dave Forster

The more detailed activity list (if you want the detail) is as follows. Note that were there is no name, the name beside the subject category header prevails:

 << File: Relaunch activity.xls >>

Dave


Bush News Update
November 14, 2000

Contents:
  1   Florida Judge Rules 5:00pm Deadline Stands
  2   A Proposal to End the Impasse in Florida: A Summary
  3   Statement By Former Secretary of State James Baker
  4   Las Vegas Sun: Statistics point to more than random
      error in Florida vote
  5   Philadelphia Inquirer: Gore might lose a second round:
      Media suppressed the Bush vote
  6   Chicago Sun Times: How Democrats Steal Elections
_______________________________________________

1
  Court Upholds Florida Vote Deadline
  The Associated Press
  Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2000; 1:04 p.m. EST

  TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- A Florida judge ruled Tuesday that state
  officials may cut off the vote recount in the state's fiercely
  contested presidential election at 5 p.m. EST.

  Judge Terry Lewis ruled that counties may file supplemental or
  corrected totals after the deadline, and Secretary of State
  Katherine Harris may consider them if she employs "proper
  exercise of discretion."

_______________________________________________

2
  A Proposal to End the Impasse in Florida: A Summary
  Tuesday, November 14, 2000

  Governor Bush and Secretary Cheney want to bring some finality
  to the election process in Florida.  They believe the American
  people are troubled by the prospect of seemingly endless counts
  and recounts until one side achieves the results it seeks.

  The vote in Florida has been counted.  It has been recounted.
  Both times, Governor Bush has emerged the winner.  And there
  have been no allegations of vote fraud in either the count or
  the recount.  Confusion, yes.  Fraud, no.  Yet the Gore
  campaign refuses to accept the result.

  Rather than accept the result, the Gore campaign has demanded
  manual recounts in predominantly Democratic counties.  In fact,
  the Gore campaign specifically selected overwhelmingly Democratic
  precincts in these counties to recount.

  Broward County
  Precinct 1F: 1308 votes for Gore, 62 for Bush;
  Precinct 6F: 1175 votes for Gore, 52 for Bush;
  Precinct 6C: 1071 votes for Gore, 19 for Bush

  This might lead to the conclusion that the Gore campaign is more
  focused on selectivity than fairness.  Even still, Gore was only
  able to pick up four votes through the manual recounts of the
  three Gore-chosen counties in Democratic Broward County.  Based
  on this small change in votes, the Broward County canvassing board
  voted to not expand the manual recount to the entire county.

  Yet now the Gore campaign wants to force Broward County officials
  to continue the manual count.  This is after they have talked for
  days about letting the local officials run the recounts.  And
  yesterday, the Florida Secretary of State reiterated that
  Florida law unambiguously requires every canvassing board to
  certify its election returns by 5:00pm today.  Amazingly, the
  Gore campaign has filed a lawsuit to block the application of
  the statute.  It seems the Gore campaign places great weight on
  Florida law only when they think it serves their tactics.

  In sum, the Gore campaign has been unwilling to accept any
  finality.  They refused to accept the first vote.  They refused
  to accept the recount.  They refused to accept the manual
  recounts in selective counties.

  That's why today Secretary James A. Baker offered the following
  common sense proposal to solve the impasse:

  Governor Bush has objected to the manual recount.  Vice President
  Gore has objected to today's 5:00pm deadline required by Florida
  law.  Governor Bush is therefore proposing to accept the manual
  recount up to today's 5:00pm deadline if Vice President Gore
  agrees.  This is fair proposal that will bring this divisive
  process to a reasonable conclusion.

_______________________________________________

3
  Statement By Former Secretary of State James Baker

  In earlier statements, we have emphasized the importance of
  achieving some finality to the election process, not just here
  in Florida, but of course for the nation as a whole.  More and
  more we see uncertainty in financial markets and we see
  uncertainty abroad. I believe that most observers, whether at
  home or abroad, are troubled by the prospect of seemingly
  endless counts and recounts until a candidate achieves the
  result he seeks.

  The vote in Florida was counted, and then it was recounted.
  Governor Bush was the winner of the vote.  He was the winner
  of the recount. There have been no allegations of vote fraud in
  either the count or in the recount.  No fraud---just confusion
  of some individuals.  Yet the Gore campaign refuses to accept
  the result.

  For the complete statement, click here:
  http://www.georgewbush.com/news/releases/111400_bakerst.html
_______________________________________________

4
  Las Vegas Sun
  Statistics point to more than random error in Florida vote
  Jace Radke
  11/10/00

  At one in 49 million, the chances of hitting Megabucks on
  one spin are slim, but not as slim as the odds that Vice
  President Al Gore would make up as much ground as he has in
  the Florida recount, according to a UNLV study.

  Economics professor Tom Carroll began running statistical
  equations Thursday on the net gains both Gore, who gained
  more than 2,200 votes, and Texas Gov. George W. Bush, who
  added about 700 votes, have made in the recount. He found
  that the statistical chances for such large and different
  totals to occur as a result of random glitches was less
  than infinitesimal.

  "The probability of being struck by lightning is about one
  in a million," Carroll said. "The same person would have to
  be hit by lightning 30 times to compare with what we've seen
  in this recount."

  For the complete article, click here:
 http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/archives/2000/nov/10/511018638.html

_______________________________________________

5
  Philadelphia Inquirer
  Gore might lose a second round: Media suppressed the Bush vote
  John R. Lott Jr.
  11/14/00

  With Florida's election results so close, charges of voter
  confusion and intimidation fill the air. Votes have been
  recounted and are being recounted yet again. Because of the
  closeness of the race, problems that have been ignored in the
  past are difficult to ignore now.

  So what has created this incredible closeness? The Gore campaign,
  along with the media, has focused on possible problems in Palm
  Beach county. Supposedly, had it not been for the 19,000 spoiled
  ballots where voters cast more than two votes for president and
  the 3,400 votes that Buchanan received, there would have been a
  Gore victory. But by now many have heard that the spoiled ballots
  are nothing new in Palm Beach, where 14,800 ballots suffered
  similar problems in the last presidential election. Heavily
  Republican Duval County apparently had over 25,000 similarly
  spoiled ballots.

  Buchanan's votes are actually not an anomaly. With 16,695
  registered members of the American Reform, Reform and Independent
  Parties, Palm Beach is a hotbed of Reform party activity. Indeed,
  it has the second highest total Reform and Independent party
  membership of any county in the state. Hillsborough County,
  which comes in third, lags behind with 11,258 members. Up to
  two-thirds of Buchanan's vote in Palm Beach can be explained
  simply by county differences in party registration.

  A more important explanation for the close results exists. By
  prematurely declaring Gore the winner shortly before polls had
  closed in Florida's conservative western Panhandle, the media
  ended up suppressing the Republican vote. Bush obtained over
  65 percent of the vote in the affected area. With only 329 votes
  separating the two candidates Friday morning, even a few hundred
  discouraged votes in addition to the 379,000 cast in Florida's
  western panhandle could have made a crucial difference.

  For the full article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/20001113_xex_how_democrat.shtml

______________________________________________

6
  Chicago Sun-Times
  Many Partial, spoiled ballots
  Scott Fornek and Abdon M. Pallasch
  11/14/00

  Cook County--home of the notorious "butterfly" ballot--was more
  likely than any other Chicago area county to have voters who
  skipped the presidential contest on their ballots last week or
  mistakenly chose more than one candidate.

  City and suburban officials said 122,859 of the 1,987,954 people
  who cast ballots in the county either did not punch a choice in
  the top contest or spoiled their ballot for that race by punching
  more than one hole.

  In Chicago, the 72,934 ballots represented 7.1 percent of all
  ballots cast. In suburban Cook, the 49,925 ballots were 5.2 percent
  of the total.

  Comparable figures in the other five counties ranged from 0.4
  percent for McHenry to 2.5 percent for Will, according to a Chicago
  Sun-Times analysis of last week's vote.

  Election officials in Cook County conceded the numbers were higher
  than normal. But they could not provide an explanation for the
  discrepancy or a breakdown, so it was impossible to tell if the
  absence of votes was largely voluntary or a problem voters had
  with the ballots.

  For the complete article, click here:
  http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/orr14.html

_____________________________________________________________

  Paid for by Bush-Cheney 2000, Inc.
  http://www.georgewbush.com

==============================================================================

To unsubscribe, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=EBASS@ENRON.COM

To change
your e-mail address or any other subscription information, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp


Dinner Wed evening the 18th  -- Philippe, Greg, Rex, Andy


The purpose of this memo is to provide a one page summary of the various
e-mails  you have already received regarding changes to trading limits since
the last regularly scheduled BOD meeting on 12/7 through the last Executive
Committee of the BOD meeting on 12/21.  The following limits are in effect
with anticipated changes  highlighted in red.  Of course these could again
change given market conditions, and Ted/Rick and Skilling may decide to
re-allocate some or all of the $17MM of Discretionary VaR on 1/6/01.

Trading Days: 12/7/00 - 12/27/00 12/28/00 - 12/31/00 1/1/01 - 1/05/01  1/6/01
forward

VaR Limits:

EES NA  $7MM   $7MM   $7MM  $5MM

NA Gas  $110MM  $70MM   $70MM  $60MM

UK Power  $20.3MM  $20.3MM  $18.95MM $13.95MM

Agg Enron  $140MM  $100MM  $100MM $83MM

Unallocated
Discretionary VaR    $0MM   $0MM   $0MM  $17MM

NOP limits with scheduled changes in temporary limits:

UK Power  68 Twh   68 Twh   59.5 Twh 59.5 Twh

European Gas 260 Bcf   260 Bcf   60 Bcf  60 Bcf

Regards,
Cassandra.


Here's an early draft.  Note Cinergy sr. mgmt has not yet commented.  No
price, either.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:29 PM -----

	Eric Thode
	12/11/2000 01:13 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: DRAFT PRESS RELEASE: Cinergy's Peaker Plant Purchase

Please review and comment.  This is scheduled for before the market opens on
Tuesday.  Thanks.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:13
PM ---------------------------

"Brash, Steve" <Steve.Brash@Cinergy.COM> on 12/11/2000 12:54:22 PM
To: "'eric.thode@enron.com'" <eric.thode@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: CC&T-Enron

Eric:
here is the current version of the news release, but I have not yet received
senior management comments.  I'll let you know as soon as I have a final
version.

 <<CC&T-Enron rel.doc>>

 - CC&T-Enron rel.doc


Due to the holiday, on Friday, December 21 traders will have to use a Custom strip to trade Power deliverable on Wednesday, December 26.  These Custom strips will be used to calculate a separate set of Power Indices which will be published on Friday afternoon along with our regular Daily Power Indices.                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Please call our Help Desk at 770 738 2101 or a member of our Power Sales Team with any questions.                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Mike O'Neill- New York- 646 792 2620                                                                                !

Chris D'Ambrosio- New York- 646 792 2620                                                                                !

JC Kneale- Houston- 713 571 7821                                                                                !

Lance Leffingwell- Houston- 713 571 6691                                                                                !

                                                                                !

Happy Holidays                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !

                                                                                !


Hi Vince:
Just wanted to wish you Happy Holidays and give you my contact information
in Canada.

I can be reached at:
zkhokher@ivey.uwo.ca
519-661-3220

Sorry about all that is happening at Enron and hope you are fine.
Wishing you and your all the family all the best.

Regards
Zeigham Khokher


Additional information on the Transco MarketLink shippers:

Shipper   Phase  Volume  Term  Delivery Pt  Rate

Aquila   I     25,000 Dthd 10 years Manhattan  $0.35
Consolidated Edison I     30,000  10  Manhattan  $0.35
ConEdison Energy I     10,000  10  Manhattan  $0.35
St. Lawrence Cement I       1,000  10  Camden, NJ  $0.30
Williams Energy I  100,000  10  Manhattan/PSEG $0.35
Virginia Power  II  100,000  10  Trenton-Woodbury $0.30
PPL Energy Plus II     30,000  10  Princeton Junction $0.18

 Phase 1 begins 11/1/01.  Phase II begins 11/1/02.  The rates shown are for
the demand and are the rates that Transco had been marketing for the
project.  Each shipper is responsible for fuel and the electric power
commodity charge and ACA.  There will be no GRI or Great Plains commodity
surcharges.  The Manhattan and PSEG delivery points are Transco Zone 6 NY
points.  The Camden, Trenton-Woodbury and Princeton Junction points are
non-NY.
 Williams reduced their precedent agreement volume from 210,000 Dthd to the
100,000 Dthd.  Williams' rights to PSEG points are north of the Linden
allocation point.  Virginia Power is buying a project from Statoil on the
Trenton-Woodbury line.  Virginia Power's commitment to MarketLink replaces
one of Statoil's two precedent agreements.  Statoil has also sold another
project that was underlying their second precedent agreement.  The new and
unnamed project owner has requested and been granted an extension to the
90,000 Dthd precedent agreement for a later phase of MarketLink.  Sunset
Energy Fleet has requested and been granted an extension for their 95,600
Dthd precedent agreeement.  LFG, a landfill gas developer, has also been
granted an extension of their 5,000 Dthd precedent agreement to enable LFG to
finalize a sale with a new owner or to locate an alternative landfill site.
PPL Energy Plus has the right to deliver into a proposed new interconnect
with PPL Interstate Energy Company pipeline system in Lower Mt. Bethel
Township, Northampton County, Pennsylvania or a proposed new interconnect
with PPL's Eden plant in East Drumore Township, Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania on a primary basis.  They also have the right to extend their
agreement at the $0.18 rate for an additional two five year terms.  Dynegy
(30,000 Dthd) and Engage (210,000 Dthd) terminated their respective precedent
agreements.  Due to these terminations and reductions,  Transco only has
announced precedent agreements of 190,600 Dthd for later phases.  If these
precedent agreements become contracts, MarketLink would have 486,600 Dthd of
shipper volume.  Transco has stated that all 700,000 Dthd of MarketLink would
be built by 11/01/04.


-----Original Message-----
From: gil_bo [mailto:gilbert@amerexenergy.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: Basis Quote

indication for the trunkline s tx jun 02-dec 07 is -13/-10,  trunkline,la.
jun 02-dec 07-10/-8

apr 02-oct 02 trunkline s tx indication -12/-9,  nov 02-mar 03  -13/-9
apr 02-oct 02 trunkline, la indication -8.5/-7.5, nov 02-mar 03 -8.5/-7.5

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:24 AM
To: gilbert@amerexenergy.com
Subject: Basis Quote

Need market indications for trunkline stx basis and index for the term
Jun02-Dec07. If you cant find it, give me Trunk ela.
Thanks
Joe

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


THIS TEMPLATE IS STORED IN THE M:ELECTRIC\24 HOUR\CIN INDEX\IPG EMAIL
REPORTS\2001\FEB 01\ REVISED TEMPLATE 2-20-01.

"Ellen Clardy" <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com> on 02/20/2001 12:06:56 PM
Please respond to <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com>
To: <Dean.Laurent@enron.com>, <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>,
<Doug.Miller@enron.com>, <Miguel.Garcia@enron.com>, <Larry.Jester@enron.com>,
"Christopher Watts" <Christopher.Watts@enron.com>, "Don Baughman"
<don.baughman@enron.com>, "John Kinser" <John.Kinser@enron.com>, "Kayne
Coulter" <Kayne.Coulter@enron.com>
cc: "Suzanna Strangmeier" <Suzanna.Strangmeier@ipgdirect.com>, "Bobette
Riner" <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>

Subject: Updated template

We have begun beta testing our 3 new indexes: TVA, ComEd, and ERCOT. If you
could please share the attached template with everyone on the hourly desk at
night, we would really appreciate it! It is very similar to the one before,
but it includes the new indexes. As always, any indicative prices are very
welcomed!

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. Thank you so much for
your time.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Market Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

 - 6ndxtemplate.xls


FYI

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 08/24/2000 08:58 AM -----

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Hemstock @ ECT                           08/23/2000 11:13 PM

To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, rmilnthorp@home.com
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: PPA News Conference Speaking Notes

Please see attached the final version of your speaking notes.

Please Note: the last page of the notes deal with Project Stanley so I have
marked them "confidential" and it is important that you not inadvertently
share the last page with anyone


Vince:

Do you know about these meeting?  Do you want to send someone in your
place?

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
01:50 PM ---------------------------
From: Paulett Smith@EES on 12/01/2000 01:00 PM
To: Breakthrough Initiative (DOGS), Breaktkhrough Initiative (CATS),
Breakthrough Initiative (RISK), Breaktkhrough Initiative (LEADERS)
cc: Breakthrough Initiative (CATS) Adm, Breakthrough Initiative (Leaders)
Adm, Breakthrough Initiative (Risk) Adm
Subject: Confirmation: Weekly Schedule, December 4-7, 2000

Please note, the CAT/DOG meeting time and location has changed on Wednesday,
December 6, 2000 to:

7:30-11:30am 2AC 12th Floor, Forum


I thought you might be interested in this.  I have no profit motive.  I am just sharing some research that I have done.

Richard Riehm
713.345.9385
Richard.Riehm@Enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: The Riehm's [mailto:rriehm@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:33 AM
To: Riehm, Richard
Subject: Outstanding College Savings Plan

Are you concerned about saving for college expenses?  If you are interested
in what I have learned, read on.  If not, delete this now and save yourself
from my poor grammar.

I started my own savings program for our kids a couple years ago, but it
wasn't very tax efficient.  Up until last year, there really wasn't a very
easy way to save for college.  You basically had 2 choices:  Educational IRA
that had contributions limited to $500 per year and you didn't qualify if
you were "rich".  The other was Prepaid College Tuition programs like the
Texas Tomorrow Fund.  The prepaid tuition programs are a good deal if you
know your kid is going to go to an in state, public school because you can
lock in tuition rates now.  It doesn't cover room & board and if your kid
goes out of state or to a private school, they will gladly give you your
money back without much growth.

A couple of years ago, Congress authorized what are know as Section 529
plans.  Each state is authorized to set up their own plan, cover different
expenses, allow different investment options and charge different fees.  One
of the best web sites I found to give me a basic background and help me
compare state plans was www.savingsforcollege.com.  This web site is packed
full of information.

Some of the features that make the 529 plans great are (each state varies on
some options):
High contribution limits (current max is $251,000 per beneficiary)
The account owner maintains control (forever) and the money is moved out of
the account owner's estate.
You can switch beneficiaries to anyone else in the family from grandparents
out to first cousins.
Multiple Investment Options from 100% Equity to 100% bonds and time adjusted
portfolios.
Qualified withdrawals cover tuition, books, room & board at all
(nationwide)accredited 2 and 4 year colleges and most technical schools.
Tax free growth on qualified withdrawals.

Each state plan has it's own quirks.  Several states, including Texas do not
even have a plan set up yet.  You really have to evaluate several state
plans to figure out what is best for you.  Each state charges a management
fee for maintaining these accounts.  The fees I found varied from 0.30% to
1.05% annually based on your account balance.  Some states only allow front
loaded mutual funds and/or make you go through a broker.  This can really
add up.

I looked for a plan that had high contribution limits to cover the most
expensive schools and aid in estate planning.  A low annual management fee
was very important to me.  I was also concerned with investment options.  I
like picking my own portfolio styles.  Some states don't give you too many
options because they think they know better.  I also found a state that
allows you to switch your investment selections once a year.  Most states
currently prohibit investment changes from what was selected when you make a
contribution.  I think this prohibition was due to a tax law that was
recently revised to allow investment switching.

I decided to go through New Mexico 529 plan.  There web site is
www.theeducationplan.com/education/SS/splash.jsp.  I was able to set up my
accounts on-line in a couple of minutes each.

I think this is the best investment vehicle for saving for college.  Let me
know what you think.  If you have any questions, I would be happy to reply.

Richard Riehm
H:281.485.8708
W:713.345.9385
RRiehm@Houston.RR.com


No.10 on your list is Jack Welch, who is CEO of General Electric not General
Motors. Please note this.
Regards
Jay N. Patel
EE & CC, Houston,TX

  The eThink Team
From: eThink@ENRON on 07/05/2000 08:08 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: eSpeak Survey: The results are in!

We recently asked you to create an eSpeak "wish list" for us.  The response
was tremendous and, in some cases, very creative.  Your fellow employees
asked for everyone from Britney Spears to George Bush.  In all, we received
requests for 61persons outside of Enron to host an eSpeak event.  We thought
you might like to know who your colleagues find interesting, so we've
provided a sampling of the suggestions below.  Here are the top ten most
requested eSpeakers.

10.  Jack Welch, CEO, General Motors
9.  Scott McNeally, CEO, Sun Microsystems
8.  Satisfied Enron Customers
7.  Stephen Covey, author, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People
6.  Oprah Winfrey, talkshow host
5.  General Colin Powell, former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S.A.
4.  Alan Greenspan, Chairman, Federal Reserve, U.S.A.
3.  Former U.S. President George Bush
2.  Bill Gates, CEO, Microsoft
1.  Texas Governor George W. Bush

While we can't make any promises, we will do our best to bring in at least
some of these special guests.  If you have any contacts who could help us get
in touch with these guest speakers, please let us know at ethink@enron.com.
Everybody needs a little help now and then, even eSpeak.

There were plenty of internal speakers requested, as well.  Those requests
should be somewhat easier to meet, although scheduling time with some of our
colleagues can be quite a task!

Thank you all for your participation.


Louise,

I have reformatted the list to show breakdown by customer type and added some more details for the power customers.

I have not been able to obtain more detail from the gas guys.

Please let me know if this is closer to what you are looking for or if you need further info. before the meeting.


Hello -

I have included an update on GENIE but I am starting with a list of action
items needed by you and mentioned in more detail below:
Changes or approval on the letter to the Office of the Chairman of EWS, EES
and ETS from Steve.
Steve, please brief Ken so we can get both events on his schedule.  He still
has other commitments that need to be moved.
Changes or approval on the panelist/invitees list ASAP.

Mailing and Acceptances
The mailings to the steering committee and commentators went out last Wed.
and Thurs. We are rapidly receiving emails and phone responses.  I will send
a weekly update of the results. Within the next week, I may request that top
Enron officials make a personal invitation to key attendees that are
unresponsive.

October event Attendees/Panelists
Please look over the excel spreadsheet of proposed attendees ASAP (in your
binder from our last meeting). We must start getting the invitations out
soon. Feel free to add names you do not see on the list. We will be taking
the same approach with the business units once they are notified of this
event.

Memos
Rick will be sending out a memo about GENIE to his direct reports today. I
will be briefing them in more detail on his call on Thursday, making sure
that they are aware of those we asking to participate as part of the Steering
Committee and commentators. They will also be given the opportunity to
suggest general attendees.

I have attached a memo that Steve can send to the Office of the Chair of EWS,
EES and ETS.

Binders
I created a briefing binder for both Sherrie and Joannie in Jeff's office and
will be doing so for Ken once he is aware of the initiative. Once the BU's
units are on board, I can do the same for the Office of the Chairman in those
groups.  I will keep them all updated on a weekly basis.

     Let me know any thoughts, comments or questions. Thanks, MSA


i got your tickets

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 03/30/2001 08:51:12 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: funnies

?
 - fortune.jpg
 - bombtech.jpg
 - airolane.jpg
 - watchp.jpg


Congratulations on your added role of CEO for Enron Europe.  I look forward
to continuing to work with you and the staff in London on risk management
operations initiatives.

I talk with Brent Price several times a week.  I know that Fernley has
appreciated his participation in London, and I hope that you have found his
involvement to be beneficial as well.  We are almost at the half way mark on
his assignment, so I will talk with you next week when I return from Calgary
to get your input on his role to date.


Jason:  Please review (I have others for you to see).  Also, Paul and I spoke
with Cadwalader this morning.  Please continue to check the international
exchanges online to see if you can locate clearinhouse rules for each
exchange.  Perhaps you can also find information on the regulatory scheme for
the jurisdictions.  I suspect we will have to hire outside counsel in each
country to answer our concerns.  Let's talk.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 10:27 AM -----

	James_Naughton@em.fcnbd.com
	05/22/2000 10:23 AM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Give Up Agreement

Sara,
Thanks again for your time Thursday.
Attached is the standard give-up agreement we discussed, with the
governing law changed to New York.
Please let me know when you have finished looking it over.  If you wish,
I'd be happy to prepare them and send to you.
Regards,
Jim Naughton

(See attached file: GIVEUP.doc)

 - GIVEUP.doc


1. Alberta PPA - Transmission Cost Responsibility Hearing

Enron is leading a coalition of 5 PPA Buyers that successfully advocated the AEUB to convene a process/hearing (the convening of which was opposed by the PPA Owners) to consider the proposal by the Transmission Administrator to apply transmission charges to PPA Buyers for transmission capacity that solely accrues to the financial benefit of PPA Owners.  One week of hearings were held in spring 2001 with the hearing scheduled to be completed in November 2001.  Value to Enron Canada if we prevail at hearing is approximately $Cdn 60 million.

2. Alberta PPA - Alberta Government Agreement to Split Enron's Sundance B PPA in Two PPAs

Government Affairs successfully lobbied Alberta Energy officials and Minister of Energy to agree to approve regulatory changes necessary to allow for the split of Enron's PPA into two PPAs despite one of the fundamental elements of the original PPA model was that the PPAs would be very large and not divisible.  This is important as the whole PPA represents 706 MW and is likely too large for Enron to sell as a whole but a PPA of 303 MW is much more marketable to potential Enron counter parties.  Value to Enron Canada if one-half PPA is sold is projected to be approximately $Cdn 50 million.

3. Alberta PPA - Opposition to Wabamun Water Treatment Plant Expansion

Government Affairs in conjunction with legal group has achieved "effected person" status in relation to an application by TransAlta (Enron's PPA Owner counterparty) to undertake an expansion to the Wabamun Water Treatment Plant.  The objective is to position Enron to resist future attempts by TransAlta to pass through the cost of this expansion to Enron.  Value to Enron Canada if we succeed is project to be approximately $Cdn 2 million.

4. Alberta - Appointment to Key Government/Industry Committees

Enron Government Affairs staff are presently members of each of the key committees in Alberta responsible for providing advice to Government and/or its appointed agents (Power Pool, TA, AEUB) on electricity market design issues, including: Advisory Committee, Power Pool Operations Committee, AEUB Electric Reliability Task Force, Industry Structure Review Consultant Selection Committee, Retail Issues Committee, IPPSA Board of Directors.  Value to Enron not quantifiable.

5.  Alberta - Enron Direct

Enron Government Affairs provided extensive support to Enron Direct in undertaking media/government launch of Enron Direct in Alberta is presently assisting Enron Direct in determining rules and requirements to expand its service offerings to B.C. natural gas market and AltaGas Utilities service territory in Alberta.  Enron Government affairs is also advocating against discriminatory exit fees proposed by Atco Gas.  Value to Enron not quantifiable.

6. Ontario - Electricity Market Opening - continue to advocate Ontario electricity market opening.

7. Ontario - Enron Direct - support for the establishment of Enron Direct's business in Ontario, including the applicable rules, licensing, and development of business procedures and forms of contract to be used.


Hi Folks,

Trying to get this to you earlier as many people had asked for it sooner.

Hope you have a great and joyful Thanksgiving.

Here's how I see the Passing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheets online at www.footballguys.com  for
exactly where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always
receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the
cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.   Peyton
Manning may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on
Kurt Warner or Daunte Culpepper, Manning's your guy no matter who he's
lining up against.   The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in
your box when it comes to deciding between players.

Note:  I've used the player stats sorted by performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups. Stats are provided by Mike
Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.  http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.   The points scored by position data is from our Footballguy
Clayton Gray.  Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Passing Game Matchups to Avoid and Exploit

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the
Offense.

Arizona Passing Game vs San Diego Defense

We rated Plummer as a "Lock" matchup and he delivered with 334 yards and 4
TDs.   If only they could play Detroit each week...  This week, they'll face
a San Diego team that ranks just # 26 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks and # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.   WR David
Boston is unstoppable and a must start.   Frank Sanders played well too last
week but had what looked to be a pretty serious hamstring injury on the TD
reception.   Check Plummer's status as he has a bruised tailbone but I'd
feel good about him again this week.

Atlanta Passing Game vs Carolina Defense

Chris Chandler continued his up and down season with a nice outing last week
leading the Falcons to a huge upset over the Packers.   He threw for 352
yards and 2 TDs.   Terance Mathis led the way with 7 receptions.   Mathis
suffered a concussion but the early reports are that he'll be able to go.
This week, the Falcons face a soft Carolina defense that ranks # 21 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 23 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs so this is looking pretty enticing.

Chicago Passing Game vs Minnesota Defense

Jim Miller to Marty Booker looked more like Montana to Rice Sunday.   I
don't recall the last time I saw two consecutive bomb TDs to the same player
like that Sunday.   Miller's been up and down but clearly, Booker is a guy
to watch.   Dez White and David Terrell are in the mix but this seems to be
Booker's show.   The Viking defense ranks # 29 in Passing Yards Allowed Per
Game over the last four weeks so it looks like the Bears may be able to
continue to roll.

Green Bay Passing Game vs Detroit Defense

Favre isn't as red hot as he was but he's still a premier QB.   He threw for
262 yards and 2 TDs last week.   He spread the ball pretty well between
Billy Schroeder, Antonio Freeman and Corey Bradford.   Bradford had the big
yardage while Schroeder and Freeman scored.   All 3 are solid plays.   TE
Bubba Franks continues to be a non factor.   The Pack draw a great matchup
this week in Detroit that ranks # 27 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.   They rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so
you have to like that.

Minnesota Passing Game vs Chicago Defense

If you'd been thinking about benching Daunte Culpepper, Randy Moss, or Cris
Carter, you got your answer Monday night.   These guys should always be in
your lineup as they're too explosive to sit against any matchup.   The Bears
rank # 31 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks so
clearly, this is a must start for these guys.   The only downside to the
Moss / Carter explosion was that TE Byron Chamberlain was left out of the
party.

San Francisco Passing Game vs Indianapolis Defense

You don't need me to tell you to start Jeff Garcia.   He's clearly one of
the premier QBs in the game.   Terrell Owens is freaky good and is obviously
a must start.   J.J. Stokes had a breakout game last week so he deserves a
look.   Tai Streets is not a bad reach and TE Eric Johnson is getting more
involved in the offense each week.   It's sort of like St. Louis where any
of these guys are worth a gamble.   Indy ranks # 23 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 25 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs so the 49ers are
looking good here.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that should have trouble
stopping the Offense.

Baltimore Passing Game vs Jacksonville Defense

Does anyone else find the Baltimore's self destruction amusing?   The Grbac
tear thing on the sidelines (which looked like sweat to me) and then Shannon
Sharpe's posturing as the self appointed spokesperson shouting about
interceptions was pretty funny.   Can Brian Billick hold it all together?
Where's Trent Dilfer when you need him?   Grbac will be fine I think.
Sharpe is always a good play if you can stand having him on your team.
Qadry Ismail and Travis Taylor are both decent options as they're seeing
plenty of action and TE Todd Heap even got a score.   Lots of weapons in
this passing game.   They'll be facing a Jaguar defense that's reeling and
beat up.   They rank # 25 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last
four weeks.   Jacksonville ranks # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs for
the year.   All in all, a good matchup here.

Detroit Passing Game vs Green Bay Defense

A perfect example of how sometimes the NFL does NOT mirror Fantasy.
Charlie Batch is becoming a desirable QB simply because his team is so bad
and he's forced to throw on every down.   Regardless of the reason, you have
to give this guy some credit as he's clearly becoming more comfortable in
the system.   He threw an amazing 62 attempts last week for 436 yards and 3
TDs.   I'll take that.   WR Johnnie Morton led the way with 153 yards.   RB
Lamont Warren had 11 catches but his status is up in the air with the return
of James Stewart.   Green Bay is nothing special against the pass lately
ranking # 22 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year, they are pretty tough on QBs though ranking # 8 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 3 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Kansas City Passing Game vs Seattle Defense

Trent Green had a week off to get everything together but you have to wonder
how much can be done in a week.   Derrick Alexander is supposedly ready to
play this week but you know how that goes.   I'd be leery until I see him
play some.   Snoop Minnis is still nursing an ankle injury and is iffy.   As
always, TE Tony Gonzalez is the primary threat.   Seattle has been below
average lately ranking # 20 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last
four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs
and # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New England Passing Game vs New Orleans Defense

Coach Bill Belichick raised some eyebrows when he announced Tom Brady would
be the starter until further notice.   Great news for Brady fans who'd been
sweating a Bledsoe comeback.   Brady's come back down to earth lately with a
mediocre 185 yard day last week but he's still showing promise.   WR Troy
Brown is by far the favored target and the only real receiver worthy of a
start in most leagues.   New Orleans has been very vulnerable lately to the
pass ranking # 30 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 16 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.

New Orleans Passing Game vs New England Defense

Aaron Brooks once again offers some vindication for those (including us)
who'd been sweating it after giving him lots of preseason hype.   2 passing
TDs plus another TD rushing Sunday made his owners happy.   I'd go with the
hot hand and keep him in your lineup.   Joe Horn is clearly the WR of choice
as Willie Jackson is up and down.   TE Boo Williams is not a bad reach if
you need a guy there.   He caught 2 TDs and looked good doing it.   New
England ranks # 24 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks but be careful, as Bill Belichick seems to sometimes pull out
something special to confuse young QBs.

Oakland Passing Game vs New York Giants Defense

You have to like Rich Gannon here against the Giant defense that was torched
by Minnesota last week.   Gannon threw for 311 yards and 4 TDs Sunday and
looks as in control of this offense as ever.   Jerry Rice looked half his
age running all over the field and played outstanding.   Tim Brown is as
good as ever.   This team has serious weapons and should go deep in the
playoffs, if not all the way.   The Giants rank # 15 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but for the year they rank # 3 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.

Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Tennessee Defense

Kordell Stewart once again looked like a real NFL QB.   He threw for 266
yards and a TD.   Most importantly, he didn't fold up when Jerome Bettis was
held down.   Hines Ward caught 9 passes for 112 yards and a TD and looks to
be a good play most every week as he's clearly the go to guy.   Tennessee
ranks just # 19 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
They rank # 26 for the year in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so these
Steelers could have a chance to do something through the air here.

San Diego Passing Game vs Arizona Defense

Doug Flutie's magic trick bag seems to be fairly well empty lately.   Losing
TE Freddie Jones last week surely didn't help even though Jones wasn't being
thrown to as much as we'd like to see.   Curtis Conway and Jeff Graham
struggled with Flutie.   This Arizona defense could be the ticket though as
Charlie Batch discovered last week.   They rank # 17 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but are playing softer than that.
They rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 24 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

St. Louis Passing Game vs Tampa Bay Defense

Kurt Warner's a must start, obviously.   As are Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt.
Both are outstanding.   Bruce had the big yards Sunday while Holt got the
TD.   RB Marshall Faulk catches as many passes as the WRs, just another
reason why he's the best.   Tampa is limping but they rank # 9 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   They do have 13 sacks
over the last 4 games so they're obviously putting pressure on the QB.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Carolina Passing Game vs Atlanta Defense

Are you really down to starting Chris Weinke?   I didn't think so.   Muhsin
Muhammad could miss this week's game with a shoulder injury.   That means
Donald Hayes would be the go to guy assuming his sore ribs allow him to go.
TE Wesley Walls is always a threat although he seems to be less of the focus
lately.   Maybe he needs to have another "Keyshawn Fit" and yell about not
getting the ball enough.   That worked pretty well for him last time.   The
Falcons rank # 12 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks
but for the year, rank # 28 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.   They rank #
30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs so they're definitely toastable.

Cincinnati Passing Game vs Cleveland Defense

It doesn't appear to be the best thing for the Bengals, but Jon Kitna
continues to air it out.   He threw 42 passes Sunday for 234 yards and 1 TD
/ 2 Interceptions.   The Bengals have about 25 WRs it seems and all are
pretty good.   Ron Dugans got into the act scoring a TD Sunday.   Darnay
Scott is the # 1 but it's a crowded group there making it tough to pick out
any one player.   The Brown defense ranks # 28 in Passing Yards Allowed Per
Game over the last four weeks so you'd think Cincinnati would be able to
throw the ball.    For the year, Cleveland ranks # 5 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs though so it's not like it's a cakewalk.

Cleveland Passing Game vs Cincinnati Defense

Tim Couch is winning the "real" NFL games even though he's not doing much
for your FF team lately.   His 144 yard / 0 TD / 3 Int game Sunday is an
example of that.   He'll get back on track though.   Kevin Johnson and
Dennis Northcutt seem to be his primary guys with Quincy Morgan there too.
Honestly, I wouldn't count on too much from anyone but Johnson.   The Bengal
defense ranks # 10 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks so they've been tough lately.   For the year, they rank # 22 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.

Indianapolis Passing Game vs San Francisco Defense

Peyton Manning looked solid even with the broken jaw.   Jerome Pathon is
gone for the year and Reggie Wayne's knee is an issue.   It looks like it'll
be his old reliable target, Marvin Harrison.   Keep an eye on TE Marcus
Pollard as he could easily be the best receiver after Harrison.   San
Francisco ranks # 13 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks and # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.   You never know when
Manning will throw that monster game though so it's tough not to play him if
he's on your roster.

Philadelphia Passing Game vs Washington Defense

Donovan McNabb didn't wow anyone with his numbers Sunday but he didn't need
to in order to win the game.   He threw for 129 yards with 1 TD.   James
Thrash is still the go to guy with Todd Pinkston worth a roll of the dice in
larger leagues.   TE Chad Lewis was pretty active and caught a TD so you
like to see that.   The Redskins are starting to believe in themselves and
now rank # 18 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
A dangerous game against the Redskins who have nothing to lose and can play
with abandon.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble
for the Offense.

Buffalo Passing Game vs Miami Defense

As a consistent Rob Johnson basher, Alex Van Pelt kept me from looking bad
by playing extremely well Sunday with 2 TDs and 316 yards.   And he actually
finished a game...   Clearly, he gives the Bills a boost.   Eric Moulds is
still the #1 WR but Peerless Price had a huge game with 138 yards and a TD.
Larry Centers was also extremely involved and TE Jay Riemersma caught a TD.
Miami is hurting without CB Sam Madison.   They rank # 6 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks so they're still tough.

Denver Passing Game vs Dallas Defense

Brian Griese just keeps losing weapons.   From Ed McCaffrey to Terrell
Davis, now Rod Smith is limited with a bad ankle.   There's only so much a
QB can do without his weapons.   Smith is saying he'll try to tough it out
and play Thursday but it's very questionable how effective he'll be if he
plays.   My friend (and Denver local) B.J. Miller says his guess is that
Smith will dress but likely not finish the game after re-aggravating the
ankle.  I'd agree with that prediction.   TE Desmond Clark needs to become a
bigger part of the passing game here.   The Cowboys are solid on defense
ranking # 5 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks and #
10 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so it's a tough matchup here for the
Broncos.

New York Giants Passing Game vs Oakland Defense

Kerry Collins threw for 321 yards but couldn't find the endzone Monday
night.   Ike Hilliard continues to improve and actually was more effective
than Amani Toomer.  Tiki Barber remains a strong force in the passing game
and that should continue.   All 3 of these guys are solid starters.
Oakland is very solid lately against the pass ranking # 4 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 15 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 16 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Seattle Passing Game vs Kansas City Defense

Matt Hasselbeck posted 134 yards and 1 TD Sunday.   With the way Shaun
Alexander is running, that's probably enough.   Koren Robinson and Darrel
Jackson are the primary targets but Hasselbeck is really spreading the ball
around.   Kansas City ranks # 14 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks although for the year, they rank # 6 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs.

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs St. Louis Defense

Brad Johnson rolled up 399 yards Sunday without throwing a TD.   That's hard
to do.   Keyshawn Johnson remains TD-less which I admit is cruelly amusing.
That'll have to break soon though as he's just catching too many passes not
to score.   I wouldn't be surprised to see him explode with a couple of
multiple TD games as the odds even out.   Johnson to Johnson is really all
there is to talk about with this passing game.   The Rams are solid ranking
# 7 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.

Washington Passing Game vs Philadelphia Defense

Tony Banks left with a concussion Sunday but Kent Graham did a fine job
filling in.   WR Michael Westbrook has shown nice maturity this season
hanging in there and now looks to be the quality WR everyone has always
expected him to be.   He had 9 receptions for 104 yards and a TD last week.
The Eagle defense can be troublesome with all their blitzing so it'll be a
challenge.   Philadelphia ranks # 11 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks and for the year, they rank # 1 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs.   Should be a tough game.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a very tough Defense posing major
problems for the Offense.

Dallas Passing Game vs Denver Defense

Ryan Leaf did little to impress anyone Sunday with a 102  yard / 0 TD / 2
Interception game.   I can't get excited about anyone on this offense.
Joey Galloway could be worth a shot just for his home run potential but it's
pretty bleak overall.   Denver ranks # 8 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks and that doesn't help any.

Jacksonville Passing Game vs Baltimore Defense

Mark Brunell is looking very iffy again and it'll likely be Jonathon Quinn
again.   (Has there ever been a good QB named Jonathon?)   That's bad news
for the Jaguar WRs Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell although both played
decent last week.   With Fred Taylor out again, Baltimore should have a
field day.   The Ravens rank # 16 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks but for the year, rank # 7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.
I'd shy away from these guys unless I had few options.

Miami Passing Game vs Buffalo Defense

Jay Fiedler looked lost last week throwing for 188 yards, 0 TDs and 3
Interceptions.   He'll have his up and down games but he seems to be
settling back more toward the downside.   His WR corps is solid with James
McKnight, Oronde Gadsden and Chris Chambers but it's hard to put a lot of
faith in Fiedler.   I do like Chambers and his big play ability.   Buffalo
has been tough lately ranking # 3 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   It's actually not so much an issue of them being tough as
it is teams just don't need to throw to beat them.   Regardless, offenses
haven't been putting up a lot of yards on them.   For the year, they rank #
24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs.

Tennessee Passing Game vs Pittsburgh Defense

A typical Steve McNair week:   Major questions all week as to whether he'll
be healthy enough to play.   Guts it out through the game, rushing for more
yards than George, throwing for 172 yards and 1 TD.   It might win NFL games
but that probably won't carry your FF team.   Derrick Mason and Kevin Dyson
are both decent players at WR while TE Frank Wycheck remains his best
receiver.   The Steelers bring a great defense though ranking # 2 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 2 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs not to mention the fact they've logged 18 sacks over
the last 4 games.   Tough matchup here.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Yeah, tell me about it.   (Payback for what!?!?)

So that means you DON'T enjoy my loving ribbing?

P.S. My butt still feels like there's all these rubberbands wrapped around
it......(:

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/29/2001 03:25 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

So you packed up our entire car and left all your stuff - what a concept.

Payback is hell.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:

The bad news is I left my bag with clothes and toiletries at the Dome.  The
good news is it's a great excuse to have to go up again this weekend!

Thanks again for everything.  Really nice with only the
principals---smaller, more intimate, less mess---and the ping pong table is
a HUGE hit.

I hope you enjoy my loving ribbing as much as I enjoy yours.

Best,
Jeff


Thanks for the update John.   I have a great personal relationship with Paul Posoli (run there whole shop), so if you need anything let me know.


Approved, subject to Drew's approval.  (Drew, the agency letter is the same
as the one with Oneok, except we've omitted some meaningless language that
Oneok had requested.)

Christine Stokes
09/18/2000 10:32 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: APS Contract Letter Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the attached letter to Arizona Public Service Company (APS).
APS shall enter into a maximum Tariff rate transportation contract effective
4/1/01 - 3/31/02 for 8,000 Dth/d of East of Thoreau to California capacity.
The associated letter designates Transwestern as agent for capacity release
transactions such that Transwestern retains an agency fee equal to 50% of any
revenues realized through the release of the capacity at rates above maximum
Tariff rate.

Please indicate approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY button.


The two documents which we will be executing are attached below
(BisonPAgree.doc and BisonPA.doc).

chris
x31666

---------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 01:14 PM
---------------------------

Linda Iske@ENRON
02/15/2001 02:49 PM
To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitch Meyer/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Bison

Bison Open Season letters and agreements are attached.  Hard copies to follow.


If we are going to vote on the NYMEX demutualization plan the ballots are due
tomorrow, so today is your last possible day to get them out, since it only
provides for mail in ballots, no faxes this time.   I check and both Mark and
Kevin are in, for right now!


Hi there.

I am attaching for the group's consideration a red line that I ran comparing
the current working draft (v4) with the draft John R. recently circulated to
Tax and Insurance.

I suggest that Pete Thompson keep the typewriter on this.  We are getting so
close to the end, I would really like to try to avoid confusion.

I am also attaching a clean copy of the current active version, and the
current list of issues under consideration.  I suggest we work through this
list and turn another draft before soliciting Cris/Herman and Lisa's
comments.  We should also give the ENA commercial reps the opportunity to
review it at that time.

Kay


Kathy,

Please review the spreadsheet guidelines I sent.  I am having to recreate
your text files every night.  Specifically, the master deal id should be a
unique number (an NA is not acceptable here), the date must be in the d-mm-yy
format not a julian date format, and there can be NO commas in any numbers.

Thanks,
Robin