Can get that number.  You want it pre "Blue Book" or pre AB 1890, or both.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Here is the new draft.   Do we a time line of actions?

Jim


Ava, please be sure this is on my calendar.  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/21/2001 04:38 PM ---------------------------
From:	Larry Berger/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/20/2001 07:52 AM
To:	Kathy Sturr/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tangie Dykes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alice Johnson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ava Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: Monthly Acctg Meeting

The Room has changed to EB 4194

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Berger, Larry
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Sturr, Kathy; Perry, Katherine; Porter, Diana; Dykes, Tangie; Johnson, Alice; Dietz, Rick
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Garcia, Ava
Subject:	Monthly Acctg Meeting

The Monthly Accounting meeting will be held on:

Friday, June 22
1:30-3:00
EB 4102

Larry


get on her list
---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 09/02/2000
12:32 AM ---------------------------

Jane James <JJames@NUI.com> on 08/31/2000 04:30:12 PM
To: amorris@fpl.com, antonl@aurora-gas.com, arcadiaBHG@aol.com,
awinans@njresources.com, c.sunser@worldnet.att.net,
cbangle@reliantenergy.com, cdonohue@worldnet.att.net, chalferty@hesco.org,
chris_prejean@perrygas.com, crice@nge.com, crice@xenergy.com,
cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com, cxcoulter@duke-energy.com, Dan Diehl
<ddiehl@NUI.com>, danchakr@nmenergy.com, ddees@pcenergy.com,
dfields929@aol.com, dkahl@scana.com, dsmereck@txuenergy.com,
dsweigart@sithe.com, dtierney@njng.com, end.nat@cwix.com,
eschuhart@noram.com, etaphouse@scana.com, frambo@reliantenergy.com,
fwmo@dynegy.com, Gina Sharkey <GSharkey@NUI.com>,
glenda.delarosa@engageenergy.com, guginda@selectenergy.com,
henry_barth@fpl.com, hvandoren@hess.com, jay.winter@eprime.com, Jeff Swidor
<jswidor@NUI.com>, jennifer.richardson@fpl.com, jillian_orr@enron.com,
jlehrmann@metromediaenergy.com, jlieberman@allenergy.com,
john.ahrens@pseg.com, John.Petriccione@conectiv.com, jpwright@pplweb.com,
jrising@pepcoenergy.com, jross@hess.com, jwalker@statoilenergy.com,
jweissman@gasmark.com, jwoodruff@gasmark.com, karie.davis@eprime.com,
keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com, kferreira@njng.com,
kremijio@utilicorp.com, kyanowski@coral-energy.com, lcampbel@enron.com,
lcastelli@gasmark.com, linda.kresge@conectiv.com, lpohnman@nfrinc.com,
lrmcclendon@duke-energy.com, lsmorris@metromediaenergy.com, lverona@hess.com,
mark_wynn@fpl.com, matthew_b_fleming@ees.enron.com, Max.Doner@enron.com,
mblaser@infiniteenergy.com, mcash@coral-energy.com, mlha@dynegy.com,
NAU87@aol.com, NUI Energy Brokers <NUIEB@NUI.com>, pbaratz@totalnrg.com,
premierenergy@uswest.net, rhonda_parker@perrygas.com,
sperry@statoilenergy.com, tdyer@spragueenergy.com, tfoxen@sithe.com,
tgoudie@hesco.org, tpwithka@sprague.com, Tracey Ann Robinson
<trobinson@NUI.com>, William_Quigley@FPL.com
cc:

Subject: Cash Outs for August, 2000

 <<Cash Out Prices for August 2000.xls>>

Jane James
NUI Elizabethtown Gas Company
908-289-5000 X5745

Never Underestimate Initiative

Jane James
NUI Elizabethtown Gas Company
908-289-5000 X5745

Never Underestimate Initiative

 - Cash Out Prices for August 2000.xls


Ok.  Here it is.  Quick and dirty.  Make any changes you like.  You're right,
if anyone's going to beat St. Louis, it's going to be KC, but I took St.
Louis.


Sure.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Messenger, John P.
Sent:	Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	vacation

John,

Leah and I are planning a trip to Florida, and I will need 4 weekday shifts off, Oct 15-18th. Can you let me know if I can use this as part of my vacation days.

Thanks alot,

John


Kay,

What do you think?  Are we prohibited from doing this?

Stuart----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Eric Booth@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 10:19 AM

		 To: Stuart Zisman@ECT, Billy Lemmons@ENRON, James I Ducote@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey M Keenan@ECT
		 Subject: Austin - LM6000 Scope of supply

This past Wednesday during our weekly site visit, I explained to Austin
Energy that I could not give them the whole LM6000 contract for
confidentiality reasons, especially with respect to the commercial
sections.   They were okay with that, but did make one last (and polite)
request for a list of the scope items that they would be getting.  What I
would propose to send is Exhibit B and B-1 from the contract (see attached).
Exhibit B is a simple bulleted scope of supply list.  Exhibit B-1 is a simple
spec that we wrote for the turbine which is itself a glorified scope document.

Let me know if this is something that I can forward to Austin Energy.  If the
attached document still gives someone heartburn, I'll end it here and
politely decline with Austin Energy.

Thanks,
Eric


<4DDE116DBCA1D3118B130080C840BAAD02CD53@ppims.Services.McMaster.CA>
From: "Wesko, George" <gwesko@PPIMS.SERVICES.MCMASTER.CA>
To: strawbale@crest.org
Subject: RADIANT HEATING
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:28:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF56D0.C002317E
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-strawbale@crest.org
Precedence: bulk

There are a number of excellent sites for radiant heating, including the
magazine fine homebuilding June-July 1992 issue: the Radiant Panel
Association;  ASHRAE  Chapter 6;   Radiantec-Radiant heating system from
Radiantec;  the following web site:  http://www.twapanels.ca/heating
index.html

The above is a good start, and each of the sites have a number of good
links.  Let me know how you make out in your search.


Don't forget the first session of the Conference begins at 1:00 tomorrow
afternoon.  Attire for the entire event is casual but since the room may be
cool and we hope to have dinner outside, you may want a sweater or jacket.


We have received executed confirmations for all outstanding transactions.

Jeff - Can you send me a copy of the termination letter.

Thanks,

Jane Wilhite
ext. 35063


This conference call is for a "status-check" on the Alberta pre-pay.

Both the US and Canada should call 1-888-422-7109
Participant code# 630795

Dial #0 at any time for operator assistance.


Rosalee - would you please pass along the short note below to Ken?   thanks
Mark

Ken - just an update on our German Federal Cartel Office proceeding, after
your conversation with Ulf Boge.  Our case has not yet been dismissed, and
yesterday, took a turn for the better.  One of the two utilities, GVS, who
had refused to shoulder their share of the cost of the economic study that
was to produce a fair rate, has now agreed to pay their share, and it appears
that the study will go forward, so we may still get the precedent we are
looking for.  Apparently, they (GVS) may not have wished to be put in the
position of being the "poster child" for why Negotiated Third Party Access
does not work.  I will keep you updated on any further developments.  Thank
you again for your intervention with Boge.  With the way things work in
Germany, it would not be at all surprising, if after your conversation with
Boge, the word got back to GVS that Enron's management at the highest level
was focussing on this case, and that it should not be seen as a failure of
the Cartel Office.  Mark Schroeder


Hey Everyone ,

I know you may not be aware that Boss's Day OCT.16,2000
We will celebrate as a group in the staff meeting on Oct.19th,
with the Big Boss Vince Kaminski and all the others , however ,
if you would like to do something special for our Boss, please
inform me whereby I can make arrangements.

                                       Thanks
                                 Kevin Moore


When are you coming in?  When shall we have dinner?


Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Stuckey, Richard A [FI]" <richard.a.stuckey@ssmb.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 4:34 PM
To:	Kimmel, Debra [FI]; Flood, Scott L [GCO]; Casaudoumecq, John [FI]; Kitchen, Louise; Costa, Randall [GCO]
Subject:	RE: PA and ETA topics

To be clear, that is 10:30am New York time

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Kimmel, Debra [FI]
> Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 5:21 PM
> To:	Flood, Scott L [GCO]; Stuckey, Richard A [FI]; Casaudoumecq, John
> [FI]; 'Kitchen, Louise'; Costa, Randall [GCO]
> Subject:	PA and ETA topics
>
>
> A conference call has been scheduled for Monday, January 7th for 10:30am
> to discuss the PA and ETA topics with Enron.
> Below is the information for the conference call:
>
> Toll Free Number:	888-780-9655
> Passcode:		ETA
> Leader:			Richard Stuckey
> Confirm:		656118
>
>
> Any questions, contact Debra Kimmel at 212-723-9472
>
> Thanks,
> Debra


Ellen,

Attached is the letter that we would like to have signed appointing Enline
Solutions as agent for Elk River Public Utility District.  Please let me know
if you have any questions.

Stacy


Here's a copy of what we filed at FERC today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 10:52 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
02/08/2001 09:58 AM

To: <nolan.steiner@avistacorp.com>, <dvermillion@avistaenergy.com>,
<rmcmanus@bakerbotts.com>, "J. Clifford Gunter" <cgunter@bracepatt.com>,
"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>,
<gfergus@brobeck.com>, <JChen@brobeck.com>, <dmbutz@butzdunn.com>,
<andrzej_kabarowski@cargill.com>, <phillip_fantle@cargill.com>,
<psteele@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<kjohan@dwp.ci.la.ca.us>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>, <joel.newton@dynegy.com>,
<dfulton@enron.com>, <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>,
<rsanders@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<sstack@enron.com>, <Fyanney@fulbright.com>, <jheath@fulbright.com>,
<jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>,
<gkeltner@jsslaw.com>, <mghelms@jsslaw.com>, <dpickett@mdbe.com>,
<gerspamer@mofo.com>, <kirvin@mofo.com>, <rloeffler@mofo.com>,
<bcurrey@omm.com>, <jstamper@omm.com>, <john.fryer@pacificorp.com>,
<rbstrong@painehamblen.com>, <thord@perkinscoie.com>,
<jtiffany@pillsburywinthrop.com>, <nancy.loftin@pinnaclewest.com>,
<Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com>, <dmperlman@powersrc.com>,
<rosteen@powersrc.com>, <awu@qeuo.com>, <hao@quinnemanuel.com>,
<drusso@reliantenergy.com>, <mderstine@rhd-law.com>, <rheyman@rhd-law.com>,
<dgarber@sempra.com>, <wdsmith@sempra.com>, <rbeitler@sempratrading.com>,
<aorchar@smud.org>, <jdalfano@srpnet.com>, <paramfjord@stoel.com>,
<rcjosephson@stoel.com>, <mbrosterman@stroock.com>, <mgoldstein@stroock.com>,
<pjazayeri@stroock.com>, <theftler@stroock.com>, <ayudkowsky@strook.com>,
<katalin_kiss@transalta.com>, <sterling_koch@transalta.com>,
<antoine.cobb@troutmansanders.com>, <cfr@vnf.com>, <gdb@vnf.com>,
<hes@vnf.com>, <gackerman@wptf.org>
cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Tracey Bradley"
<tbradley@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Electronic Copy of Complaint Against PX

I've attached an electronic copy of the complaint, which has been filed
within the past hour.  Hard copies that also include the cover letter, Fed.
Reg. notice, and Appendix for service list are being mailed to all persons on
FERC's service list in EL00-95-000 (the San Diego complaint proceeding).

Thanks to all who contributed to this project; it was truly a group effort.
And special thanks to the nine companies that agree to join as signatories.

For those companies that did not join in, we encourage you to intervene ASAP
in support of the complaint, including the request for an immediate
suspension of the chargeback before the next round of chargeback invoices
come due (which we believe could be as early as Feb. 15).  Since we are
asking FERC to suspend the chargeback no later than Feb. 14, your immediate
intervention would be very helpful.

Thanks again.  Ron

 - CALPXCOM.DOC


Thanks for your note.  It is kind of exciting.

I think this attachment is probably the treaty you want.  I'm sorry it didn't
"save" better but I think you can probably print it out legibly.  I have a
copy printed from Westlaw.  Let me know if you want me to fax it.

From: Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 01/18/99 10:16 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Mark, congratulations on your promotion to Vice President.

On a more mundane matter could you have a clerk or legal assistant get me a
copy of the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the US and Argentina.  Our
regulatory and commercial group wants to leave no stone unturned in their
search for how to deal with the ENARGAS.


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/25/2001>, published as of 09/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Bryan

Please, take a look at the resume of Howard Haughton. He looks like an answer
to your prayers.
It's the first attachment.

Vince

P.S. Jeff, the headhunter, can be reached at (949) 813 2241. Please, set up
the interview,
if interested, through him.

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
01:57 PM ---------------------------

"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" <jjw@ziplip.com> on 01/12/2001 12:51:59 PM
Please respond to "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" <jjw@ziplip.com>
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: molly.magee@enron.com
Subject: 1 Candidate and 2 interns

Hi Vince and Molly.
Here attached is one candidate who is particularly interested in having his
profile sent to Vince...he is going to be traveling to NY from the UK soon
for 2 wks.
He specifically asked my partner at RobertWalters in the UK to investigate
Enron through my new relationship with you guys. He would be Howard Haughton,
attached below (CV).

The other 2 resumes are my students at the University of Michigan. Howard Lin
received a 4.0/4.0 for his last term and will be willing to do whatever it
takes to intern at Enron for June- Aug. I have his picture included as well.
The second is Sung, they are friends. Howy will be done expected in May 2001
and Sung in May 2002. They are my favorite interns and I expect they can be
cultivated to the Enron culture with no real cost to you (a "test drive
before committal. I have agreed to represent them and
shall take ownership, as they become graduate candidates upon their degree
completion.

I hope these attachment can represent my value and commitment to quality of
talent to Enron.

Thank you for your acceptance.
Best wishes for the weekend.
Jeff

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *

 - 00343938alec.doc
 - SUNGVINCE.doc
 - HOWARDAGENT9498132241.doc
 - howardlin.gif


---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           05/01/2001 09:21 AM

To: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: sscott3@enron.com
Subject: New regulatory attorney

T.J. Please forward to the group.  Thanks.

Please join me in welcoming Susan Scott.  Susan will be assisting East Power
as a regulatory attorney.  Her phone is 30596.  She is currently sitting near
the fundamentals group, but will be spending time near me by the real time
desk learning the "ropes."

Christi


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 05:14 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/13/2001 05:13 PM

		 To: Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic DiMare (E-mail)"
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'"
<drothrock@cmta.net>, "'John Fielder (E-mail)'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "'Phil
Isenberg (E-mail)'" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda
Sherif (E-mail)'" <lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
<lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'" <schoongl@sce.com>, "'John
White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, <dhunter@s-k-w.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dow Jones--PUC to Raise Rates Another 25% to Cover DWR Contracts?

Calif DWR Seen Asking PUC To Order 25% Rate Increase Fri
By Jason Leopold

07/13/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
(This article was originally published earlier Friday.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Department of Water Resources, the
agency purchasing a bulk of the state's power needs in lieu of the three
investor-owned utilities, is expected to tell state regulators Friday that
they need to increase electricity rates by as much as 25%.

This is because there are insufficient funds in the current revenue stream
to cover a $13.4 billion bond sale, three commissioners with the Public
Utilities Commission told Dow Jones Newswires late Thursday.

PUC President Loretta Lynch is expected to issue a draft decision Friday
either endorsing the rate hike request or calling for an audit of the DWR's
current revenue stream before she makes a decision, aides in her office
said.

If the PUC determines that there are not enough funds in the current rate
structure to cover the bond sale, it will have no choice but to order the
rate increase, according to the legislation that put the state in the power
buying business.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in just two months, if approved by the PUC, the commissioners
said.
"Back in May when we ordered the first rate increase, we said we may be
forced to do it again by the summer," one commissioner said.

"It's unfortunate, but it shouldn't be a shock to anyone. The state has
made an enormous commitment to Wall Street that rates would go up whenever
it's needed to ensure there is enough money to pay off those bonds."

Lynch and a spokesman for the DWR were unavailable for comment late
Thursday.

Separately, Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, has
drafted a proposal expected to be introduced into the Assembly Friday or
Saturday that would have large businesses using the most electricity to
finance the bulk of the $43 billion in long-term power supply contracts,
aides in his office said.
Moreover, Keeley's plan is aimed at reducing rates for consumers who use
the least amount of power. Details of the plan are still sketchy, aides
said.

Possible Rate Hike To Generate $2.5B Yearly For State

The 50% rate increase ordered in May is expected to generate $5 billion
annually, and if the PUC orders a 25% increase, that is expected to
generate $2.5 billion. However, it is still unclear if that is enough, the
commissioners said.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in four months, if approved by the PUC, the three commissioners
said.
Since January, the state has spent nearly $8.5 billion buying electricity
on behalf of customers of Edison International (EIX) unit Southern
California Edison, Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric and
PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric.

The state has borrowed more than $7 billion from its general fund, which
must be repaid by ratepayers at 6% interest, to purchase power.

In addition, the state has locked itself into $43 billion in long-term
power supply contracts at high prices for as much as 20 years to ensure
there is enough power to meet demand. Future rate increases to finance the
contracts are likely, state officials have said.

But if the PUC orders another rate increase, the money won't benefit the
utilities, which have billions of dollars in power costs to recover.
Instead, it will be used to guarantee Wall Street financial institutions
that there is sufficient funds in the rate structure to allow $13.4 billion
in revenue bonds to be sold.

The bonds are expected to be sold in August or September, said state
Treasurer Phil Angelides.

The commissioners said the PUC and the DWR waited to address another rate
hike to see if state officials and generators were successful in coming to
terms on $8.9 billion the state says it was overcharged for power since
last year.

After two weeks of hearings between generators and a delegation of
California utility executives and energy officials, talks broke down
Monday. Generators offered the state $716 million in refunds, but Gov. Gray
Davis balked, threatening to sue to recover the full $8.9 billion.

Any refunds would have been disbursed to the utilities and the DWR, which
could have deferred the need for any rate increase, according to Steve
Maviglio, press secretary to Davis.

An administrative law judge with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
said Thursday he will recommend that the commission not order cash refunds
to California because the state's utilities owe far more money to the
generators than what he thinks the state is owed.

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 11:10 AM -----

	"Houlihan, Terry" <thoulihan@mdbe.com>
	09/29/2000 06:33 PM

		 To: "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Generator Contact List for CPUC investigation I.00-08-002

Here is the generator counsel list you requested.  If you have collected a
list of counsel for other parties, I would like to have it.

 <<Reliant--Atty List.DOC>>

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

 - Reliant--Atty List.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------

Christie Patrick
12/01/2000 12:55 PM
To: Roberts_John@gsb.stanford.edu, benjamin_beth@gsb.stanford.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul LeBeau/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron/GLOBE

Dear Drs. Roberts and Benjamin,

Vince Kaminski and I enjoyed and appreciated the opportunity to speak with
you this morning. Enron is very happy to agree to participate in Stanford's
GLOBE project (being conducted in partnership with McKinsey & Company).

Attached please find my business card with all of my contact information.

 I look forward to hearing from Dr. Benjamin in the near future to begin
Enron's involvement.

Thank you!

--Christie.


11:15 today still works.


Ravi,

I shall leave the decision to Stinson and you.

Vince

Ravi Thuraisingham@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 02/23/2000 11:39:01 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince Kaminski
cc:
Subject: Stanford OR - Summer Interns

Hi this is one of the junior PhD students that we've visited in Stanford.
Are we interested in bringing him to Enron Research and or EBS research.
I'll have to think about his role in EBS.

Ravi.
----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/23/00 11:32
AM -----

	shikhar@stanford.edu
	02/20/00 07:24 PM

		 To: Ravi.Thuraisingham.Enron_Communications@enron.com
		 cc: Ravi.Thuraisingham@enron.com, (bcc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications)
		 Subject: Stanford OR - Summer Interns

Hi Ravi:

Please find attached my resume for the summer internship program. I
apologize for the delay. We actually lost your contact info. Please let me
know if you will need any additional information and/or a cover letter
besides the resume and I can send it right away.

Thanks

Regards,
Shikhar
------------------------
Shikhar Ranjan
PhD Student
Management Science & Engineering
Stanford University CA
(650) 497 5762

 - Resume00-ENE.doc


ok

Andrea Weller
Market Strategist
Strategic Energy, LLC
Office: (714) 573-1014
Cell:    (949) 230-3404
aweller@sel.com

-----Original Message-----
From: jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [mailto:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:35 PM
To: RSchlanert@electric.com; JSMOLLON@newwestenergy.com;
arem@electric.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
o f Su spension DA

how about 4:00 p.m. conference call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rebecca Schlanert [mailto:RSchlanert@electric.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:33 PM
To: 'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com'; arem@electric.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
o f Su spension DA

I would be open to this as well.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [SMTP:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
> To:	arem@electric.com
> Cc:	douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> Subject:	Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
> of Su spension DA
>
> I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached
> proposal.  I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
> everyone.
>
> NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
> having had a chance to think more about it.  I wanted to run it by
> everyone
> to get your thoughts before submitting a redline.  If you feel this
> warrants
> a conference call I will gladly set one up for today.  Time is of the
> essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible.  If we all
> agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
> tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.
>  <<arm-puc-plan.doc>>
> Proposal Benefits
>
> 	1.	We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
> proposing.
> 	2.	Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
> 	3.	Strong argument for avoiding any contract review.    Our
> verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but
> add
> details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
> and validation
> Thank you,
> Janie Mollon
> Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
> Office:  602-629-7758
> FAX: 602-629-7772
> Mobile:  602-625-3892
>  << File: arm-puc-plan.doc >>


I understand that Ashley Worthing has been hired by Enron to start work this
summer.  I think that she is graduating from Texas A&M.  She is my cousin's
daughter, so I am just curious whether or not she is coming in as an
analyst.  Please let me know if that is the case.  Thanks.


You mean Bob Lane?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Bob Long

Do you have Bob's phone number?


I'll put my mind to it (what's left of it).


** Sent for Sandi Thompson**

To All California Power Exchange Participants:

Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), as
part
of an ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested information
that may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff.  The CPUC has
requested the California Power Exchange to provide such information no later
than Wednesday, October 4, 2000.  If you desire to assert a claim of privilege
or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority, the California Power Exchange
will include your written assertion of that claim together with its submittal
to
the CPUC, provided that it is timely received.  Your written statement should
be
directed to the CPUC as follows:

     Sean H. Gallagher
     California Public Utilities Commission
     505 Van Ness Avenue
     San Francisco, CA  94102

You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:

     Karen Koyano
     California Power Exchange
     1000 S. Fremont Avenue
     Unit 20
     Alhambra, CA  91801
     626.537.3173 facsimile

Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Friday,
September 29, 2000, 5:00 p.m. PDT, to be included with any information
delivered
to the CPUC.  You are also free to take any other legal action you may deem
appropriate in the circumstances of this investigation.  A copy of the
subpoena
is attached for your reference.

Thank you.

(See attached file: CPUC subpeona #2 9-20-00.doc)

 - CPUC subpeona #2 9-20-00.doc


what happened to the avs?  are they going to shit their pants again this
year?


Here is 2053-E from PG&E.? Do you also want the Edison  version?
?
Dan

>>> <ryang@enron.com> 11/15/00 02:06PM  >>>

We want to see this one  to.

"Daniel Douglass"  <Douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 11/15/2000 11:44:12  AM

To:?? <jdasovic@enron.com>,  <marcie.milner@enron.com>,
?????  <mpetroch@enron.com>,  <Roger_Yang@enron.com>,
?????  <susan_j_mara@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:? PG&E Advice  Letter

PG&E has also filed its version of a net energy  metering tariff.?? Are any
of these tariffs of interest to  Enron?

Dan
(See attached file: 11-15-00 PG&E AL Summary  Chart.doc)
 - 2053-E Form79-854_.doc
 - 2053-E TS.doc
 - 2053-E AL.doc


Louise --

My recommendation for an approval process for EnTouch is as follows:

1)	The deadline to provide information for that week's issue of EnTouch will be Wednesday at 12:00 pm.  All information submitted after that time will be held until the following week.
2)	A draft of EnTouch will be forwarded to each business unit head (or their designee) and commercial group head (or their designee), who has a Business Highlight or other information appearing in that particular issue.  E-mail, phone or in-person approval will be required from either a business unit head (or their designee) or commercial group head (or their designee) prior to distribution to Enron Messaging Administration on Thursday at 2:00 pm.
3)	If approval is not received prior to the deadline, the Business Highlight or other information will be pulled until approval is received.
4)	In the event a business unit or commercial group provides information that crosses business unit or commercial group lines, all affected business units and commercial groups will receive the draft and a representative of each involved party will be required to approve per instruction # 2.

I believe this process will alleviate the two problems that have occurred over the past few months.  Please advise.

Additionally, I have attached the list of contacts Kathie uses for gathering EnTouch information.  It includes the primary contacts and their secondary contacts.  Please feel free to comment on this list.

Thanks.

Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 12/03/99 04:51 PM
---------------------------

Johnnie Williams
12/03/99 12:02 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MidCon Interconnect

Gerald,

Following is one of the memos detailing some of the concerns about pressure
differentials between HPL & MidCon.

Johnnie
---------------------- Forwarded by Johnnie Williams/HOU/ECT on 12/03/99
12:00 PM ---------------------------

Will Chen
11/19/99 08:47 AM
To: Johnnie Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MidCon Texas Flagstaff Road Interconnect

Johnnie,
I have a attend the A/A mentoring program this morning and won't be back till
11am.
if you need me, page me, 800-608-9432.
I am forwarding you this email I got from Brad last night.

---------------------- Forwarded by Will Chen/HOU/ECT on 11/19/99 08:46 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brad Blevins                           11/18/99 06:15 PM

To: James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Will Chen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tom Fry/GCO/Enron@Enron, Garry D Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MidCon Texas Flagstaff Road Interconnect

I have run a flow study on the east side of HPL's Houston Loop to determine
whether HPL can deliver 100 MMCFD to MidCon during winter peak hour
conditions.  The interconnect pressure will be around 600 psig, which will
allow HPL to deliver 100 MMCFD to MidCon with an 8" AAT-90 turbine meter.
This is the full capacity of this particular 8" turbine meter.  The following
assumptions were made in the preparation of this flow study:

1) The available gas pressure at Bammel is 900 psig.
2)  The Hardy Toll road mainline regulator is fully open, not taking any
pressure cut.
3)  Entex being delivered gas at a peak hour rate, which is defined as HPL's
historical peak Entex day plus 30%.
4)  The deliveries being made to both the Destec and Lyondell Channelview
plants total no more than 60 MMCFD.

If capacity gets tight at Flagstaff, Gas Control can shut in the regulator
from the Enerfin system to the 12" (3018) line to boost pressures.  Gas
Control could also raise the pressure at Bammel to more closely track the
MAOP of 936 psig on the east side of the Bammel loop.

Please note that if Bammel pressures are lower than 900 psig due to low
inventory at Bammel, and Entex is on a peak hour delivery rate, then HPL will
have difficulty making a 100 MMCFD delivery to MidCon Texas at Flagstaff.
Increasing the turbine meter size to a 12" AAT-140 would solve this problem,
but this would result in a greatly oversized measurement facility during
normal operating periods.  A better solution would be to shut in the Enerfin
and Maxey Road regulators to boost pressures on the east side and to attempt
to limit Lyondell and Destec deliveries.


missing deals for bob:

buy edison mission
223.00
dec
np15
25 mw
peak

sell calpine
223.00
dec
np15
25 mw
peak


Ben,

Here is the updated contact list and a list of recipients of the IM. If you
discover any discrepancies please let me know so we can correct them.

Regards,
                James J. Heckler
  Global Energy & Project Finance
  V:(212) 325-5809
  F: (212) 325-8323
  CREDIT | FIRST
  SUISSE | BOSTON

 <<E2 Investor List.xls>>  <<IM Recipient Log.xls>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - E2 Investor List.xls
 - IM Recipient Log.xls


Molly, this is to confirm agreement from Sally Beck on the $15,000 signing
bonus as part of Suzanne Calcagno's offer.  Sally suggested you contact David
Oxley as a formality.

Let me know if you have any questions, tks - Bob


Dear John, dear Vincent,

Let me up-date you on the roundtables we decided in the last meeting to focus on during the rest of the academic year.  The original idea was to keep the number of events from 3 to 4 roundtables each semester.  The result of the last meeting with all members was driven by enthusiasm, and as you see below we produced a prolific list of 13 subjects.  Maybe you can help us to narrow down to a reasonable number, 12 events (one we had yesterday) by May 2002 we think are too many.

I also would take this opportunity to update on the ongoing relationships with the most prominent industry in the sectors and have your feedback, suggestion on how to group them in the roundtable.
We got great support so far from Reliant, Enron, Mirant, Schell (Coral), Bp, Duke.   El Paso, Chevron-Texaco, Phillips, and Halliburton etc.. also are interested and we will present the club to them as well.  The major challenge for us is not transform the Energy Club in a Finance Energy Club.  At Rice we already have a Finance club and it works very well.  We want first educate about the energy industry in general, and second present the opportunities for MBAs in the industry in different areas, including finance but not limited to.

Topics of Roundtable Meetings:

0) Energy "101"
1) Corporate Finance (Treasurer or Controller)
2) Energy Consulting
3) Financial Services (trading, risk management)
4) Origination, Marketing and Sales (Oil, Gas, Electricity) - Marteen
5) Project Development, strategic planning
6) Project Finance
7) Project Risk Management
8) Regulation, Deregulation, and Restructuring - Reliant done 9/17/2001
9) Structuring of Products
10) Supply Chain
11) Telecom - Broadband
12) Venture Capital within energy industry - Brian, Paresh

Thanks in advance for your precious suggestions and I am looking forward to meeting you.

Luigi Calabrese
MBA Candidate Class of 2002
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University - Houston, TX
Phone 713 922 4844
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~luigical