Gerald, when you get a chance, send me Paul B's email address/web site info.
I've got some digital pictures to send him...........

Had a good time with you this weekend bud, let's hook up again when you want
to go car shopping.

E


Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/04/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, MDay
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least
Thus Far)

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	01/04/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least
Thus Far)

what is his email?

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/04/2001 04:22 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least Thus
Far)

Yes, I'll get to Mike Day.


Paul -

Thanks for your voice mail.  We can't print the list of Reference Entities
from the website because we have not been given access.  We do need to get
that list to the various other reviewers in Houston and I am sure that is the
list that Michael referred to.

The EnronOnline people are probably concerned because they don't have a final
list of Reference Entities for their launch.  That list absolutely must be
scrubbed by the other GC's before it is approved.

Mark


Dear September Vincent,

Just a reminder that your current Reliant Energy HL&P statement is ready
for you to review at https://ebill.reliantenergy.com/logon/  If you
participate in the Automatic Payment Plan (APP), your bank account will be
automatically drafted for the amount due.  Remember, with Auto Pay no
action is required to ensure your bill gets paid.
If you do not participate in Automatic Payment Plan (APP), you can pay
your bill immediately or schedule payment for a later date.  As with paper
bills your payment is due about 2 weeks from the statement date. The
online bill replaces your paper bill, a paper copy of your bill will not
be sent.

Should you need to modify your account information, go to
https://ebill.reliantenergy.com/logon/  log into eBill and select User
Information. There you can update your information such as your email
address, change your password and add accounts.

As you use our eBill service, please do not hesitate to provide comments
through the Contact Us section of the site. Check out the Frequently Asked
Questions section for a quick reference.

Again, thank you for choosing Reliant Energy's eBill service.

Reliant Energy eBill Customer Care
http://www.reliantenergy.com/


Today was the final ENA PRC.  Relative ranking results up through the Senior
Director level are final.  You and your management team can begin the process
of giving performance reviews to your employees.  I spoke with Sheila Walton
today to inquire about an expected time frame for completing and conducting
the employee reviews.  She indicated that the target completion date should
be the end of July.

Promotions will be effective August 1st.  It is Dave Delainey's intent to
announce ENA promotions sometime after he returns from vacation on July 24.
This drives the end of July target completion date for reviews.   I do not
yet know if Delainey wants all ENA promotions to be announced in a single
memo, or if each group within ENA will prepare such a memo.  I will keep you
updated on this as I get direction from him.

Please note the following change since our Energy Operations PRC in June.  In
order to place focus on the qualitative feedback during this mid-year review
process, we will not share performance clusters with employees when
conducting their reviews.   It is very important for all of us to be
consistent in this process, so please communicate this to all in your groups
who will be giving performance reviews.  It is important to note, however,
that the content of an employee's review should be consistent with our view
of that employee's relative ranking.  In other words, an employee in the
Satisfactory category should not be given a review that simply states that
the employee is doing a great job.   Clearly, a large number of employees
performed at a higher level than those employees in the Satisfactory
category, so the feedback to that employee should include some specific areas
of improvement needed in order for the employee to make a stronger impact in
the organization, help you achieve the groups goals, etc.

Also please note the following:

Performance reviews for anyone in the Satisfactory, Needs Improvement or
Issues categories must be reviewed by HR prior to these reviews being given
to the employees.  This will ensure that our feedback is commensurate with
the relative performance of that employee.  (This has been the stated process
for the bottom two categories, and we are adding Satisfactory to this process
as well.)
Please remember to include a more experienced member of your management team,
yourself, or an HR professional in reviews being conducted by inexperienced
members of your management team, or those management team members where you
have a concern over their ability or willingness to deliver candid and
perhaps tough performance feedback.  I believe that we have spent some time
in identifying these situations.  I ask your help to ensure that we follow
through on this commitment.

Thanks for all of your efforts in making this mid-year PRC process a
meaningful one.

It is Dave Delainey's intent to announce It if 0


You need to send in your reviewers.  Or, I'll name them for you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Reviewer List

How's this look?

Steve Kean
Rick Shapiro (GA)
Paul Kaufman (GA)
Vicki Sharpe (EES)
Mike D. Smith (EES)
Chris Calger (ENA)
Karen Denne (PA)


Please schedule a meeting for Thurday afternoon (30 minutes) with Mike DeVille, Kerry Roper, Greg Piper and me to review the operating budgets for 2002, and the impact on the ENW operating budget.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:55 PM
To: Piper, Greg
Subject: FW: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

I will include Kerry in this meeting with Mike.  Do you want to attend as well?  Let  me know, and we will schedule it so that it works for you, too.  --Sally
-----Original Message-----
From: Deville, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:17 PM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: RE: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

Sounds good. The only thing I have scheduled now is a 10:00 - 10:30 on Thursday. Let me know when you want to meet.
mike d

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Deville, Mike
Cc: Piper, Greg; Roper, Kerry
Subject: FW: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

Mike:  Do you have time to get together on Thursday to review the budget data that you have in hand?  Assumptions regarding number of employees within business units and the timing of the sale or shut-down of certain lines of business have a direct impact on the ENW revised budget for 2002.  --Sally
-----Original Message-----
From: Causey, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:40 PM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: RE: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

You should get the latest from Mike Deville.  Hopefully, they are very accurate as we are using them for the DIP lending process.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Causey, Richard
Cc: Piper, Greg
Subject: FW: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

Rick:  Do you feel that the revised budgets that your team has received are "baked enough" so that it makes sense for us to relook at the ENW budget in light of revised plans for the various business units?  My understanding is that the business plans that Jim Fallon had asked the various wholesale business units to complete by December 21 have not yet been submitted to Jim.  Which would lead me to ask whether or not the revised 2002 budgets that you have are far enough along in the process for us to use in re-evaluating the ENW budget.

Let me know your thoughts on your degree of comfort with the revised budgets and who on your staff we could work with to get the necessary information to rework the ENW budget, if necessary.  Thanks.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: McMahon, Jeffrey
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:55 PM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: RE: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

Yes...they have all been completed.  Pls get with someone in Causey's world to get the details.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Mon 12/31/2001 3:37 PM
To: McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc: Piper, Greg
Subject: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

ENW submitted our preliminary revised budget two weeks ago.  In our meeting in the Board Room, we did acknowledge that the ENW budget is very dependent upon the business plans of the business units that we support.  Since our budget meeting was the first that you conducted, we agreed that the ENW revised 2002 budget would need to be reviewed again once the business plans and associated budgets for other Enron business units were completed.  Has that process been completed such that we can now re-evaluate the 2002 budget for ENW?

I will follow up with you or someone on your staff on January 2 so that we can complete this budget process.

I hope that you and your family enjoyed the holidays.  --Sally


This meeting will be held on 12/13 starting at 8:30 AM in 3AC19C1.  In order
to ensure the meeting moves quickly, please provide a pre-rating to me for
each of your employees.  I need these ratings by 5:00 PM on 12/8/00 to ensure
they are loaded for the meeting.  To help you pre-rate your employees, the
Corporate distribution is as follows:

5% Superior
30% Excellent
30% Strong
20% Satisfactory
15% Needs Improvement/Issues

Business units are expected to meet these targets or do their best to meet
these targets.  However, no rankings will be forced.    Please keep this
distribution handy when pre-rating employees.  If you need any help, please
feel free to call me.  Thanks!


Gerald,

We were approached before the holidays by First Union representing Universal
Compression to potentially serve as a back-up fleet manager for a large
portion of their fleet that they are trying to take off balance sheet (via
First Union) should they become insolvent.  They are trying to do this
simultaneously with the close of the merger with Weatherford.  Mark and I met
with the CEO (Steve Schneider) and CFO (Ernie Danner) prior to the holidays
to discuss this a little further as well as a broader alliance between Enron
and Universal to chase electric horsepower deals.   Universal is comfortable
with Enron having somebody like Hanover as a back-up to be called upon should
Enron be called to fulfill it's role and even with a spread, so long as
Hanover does not "see" Universal and vice-versa.  Suggested stand-by fee of
$150,000-$200,000/yr. has been casually thrown out.  Please review the
attached document and let's discuss further - perhaps tomorrow morning.  I
talked with Steve Schneider yesterday and he told me that Ernie Danner would
be getting with me today regarding a confidentiality agreement regarding this
deal as well as a potential marketing alliance, which we would like to
discuss further with you as well.  Give me a call when you get a chance and
we'll set something up.

Thanks,
Chris

You will find attached a copy of an agreement that has been forwarded to us
regarding
----- Forwarded by Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 10:16 AM -----

	Tim Proffitt
	12/14/2000 08:03 PM

		 To: Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
		 cc:
		 Subject: Secondary Service Provider - Contract

Don't know if I ever sent you this, but here is an electronic copy of this.

Tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Proffitt/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 08:05
PM ---------------------------

"Kipp, James" <james.kipp@funb.com> on 11/30/2000 09:19:20 AM
To: "'tim.proffitt@enron.com'" <tim.proffitt@enron.com>,
"'john.thompson@enron.com'" <john.thompson@enron.com>
cc: "'edanner@universalcompression.com'" <edanner@universalcompression.com>
Subject: Secondary Service Provider - Contract

First Union Securities, Inc.

The attached file is an generic sample of the contractual role the SSP would
be asked to fulfill under the ABS structure.  Give me a call should you have
questions.  James

James M. Kipp
Managing Director
Energy Investment Banking
(713) 346-2701 - Direct
(713) 650-1208 - Fax
e-mail:  james.kipp@funb.com

>  <<Mgmt Agrmt 11_00.doc>>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - Mgmt Agrmt 11_00.doc


My comments below.

	Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate 06/12/2001 04:39 PM 	   To: Savita Puthigai/ENRON@enronXgate, Kal Shah/ENRON@enronXgate, Erica Bess/ENRON@enronXgate, Stacy E Dickson/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: News Ticker for US Gas Phy - Texas Products

Please find below News Ticker that has been reviewed and, unless you have any final comments/thoughts, will be posted on Wednesday June 13
Thanks
Carlos

Changes to Descriptions of US Physical Gas Products Delivered Within Texas

Due to the recent sale of the Houston Pipe Line Company by Enron, which was effective June 1st 2001, the Product Long Descriptions of US Physical Gas products for which the Delivery Point is located in Texas have been amended.  Instead of "Houston Pipe Line Company," your new counterparty for these transactions executed in the future will be "Enron North America Corp."

This change affects EnronOnline physical natural gas products delivered at Carthage, Exxon Katy and Waha locations. We have added the following language to the Product Long Descriptions of these affected products:

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the General Terms and Conditions, if applicable, this Transaction is between Counterparty and Enron North America Corp.

This language will supersede the language in the first clause of your "General Terms and Conditions" (GTC) agreement, which presently states, "In the event that the Delivery Point for a transaction is located in the state of Texas, "Enron" shall mean Houston Pipe Line Company."

Please contact the EnronOnline Help Desk at (713) 853 HELP if you have any questions.


FYI,

Here is the latest update on the turbine at Mullinville, unit 26. Hickham Industries is doing some analysis on the unit this week to give us a better idea of what we are looking at. Right now the completion date is 10/31/01. It could be a little longer, depending on what the think the solution is.

Jerry


Can you put a notice on EOL that due to MLK day, we will be closed Sunday and
be offering Nymex products only from 4-7 on Monday.
Thanks,
John


Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 11/16/00 01:47 PM
-----

	Sherri Carpenter@ECT
	11/16/00 09:47 AM

		 To: EWard@plastipak.com
		 cc: (bcc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: Another election joke

If it works for politics, it should work for sports...

NEW YORK  --The New York Mets announced today that they are going to court to
get an additional inning added to the end of Game 5 of the World Series. The
batting, pitching, and bench coaches for the Mets held a press conference
earlier today. They were joined by members of the Major League Players Union.

"We meant to hit those pitches from the Yankee pitchers," said the Mets
batting coach. "We were confused by the irregularities of the pitches we
received and believe we have been denied our right to hit."

One claim specifically noted that a small percentage of the Mets batters had
intended to swing at fast balls, but actually swung at curve balls.  It was
clear that these batters never intended to swing at curve balls,  though a
much higher percentage were not confused by the pitches.

Reporters at the press conference pointed out that the Mets had extensively
reviewed film of the Yankees pitchers prior to the World Series and had in
fact faced the Yankees in inter-league play earlier in the year.

"The fact remains that some of the pitches confused us and denied us of  our
right to hit," said the Mets batting coach. "The World Series is not over yet
and the Yankees are celebrating prematurely."

Major League Baseball has reviewed the telecast of all the World Series games
and recounted the balls and strikes called by the umpires of each game.
"While some of the strikes called against the Mets were, in fact, balls,
there were not enough of them to change the outcome of the World Series," the
commissioner said.

Another portion of the Mets legal claim stated that, based on on-base
percentage, the Mets had actually won the World Series, regardless of the
final scores of the games. "It's clear that we were slightly on-base more
often than the Yankees," said a Mets spokesman. "The World Series crown is
rightly ours."

The manager of the Mets has remained in relative seclusion, engaging in some
light jogging for exercise. He has stated that he believes "we need to let
the process run its course without a rush to judgment."


Steve:

Mike Terraso asked me to send you some information relating to the timing and the potential process of the Clean Water Act Section 308 information request sent from EPA Washington to Enron Corp. As Mike likely mentioned, the request seeks information regarding "discharges" and "releases" of "oil" from pipeline facilities since July 1998. Although the information request was addressed to Enron Corp., we believe the EPA's focus should be on the EOTT pipeline system. We shared these and other thoughts with the agency when we met last week in Washington D.C. We hope to hear back from EPA soon regarding clarification/resolution of several issues discussed during the meeting (e.g., whether a response solely from EOTT is sufficient at this time).

TIMING -- Enron Corp. received the information request on July 7, 2001. We requested and received a 90-day extension from the agency, thereby making our response due on November 7, 2001. The agency likely will require a considerable amount of time to review our response because we will report a fairly significant number of discharges/releases, which will be accompanied by a large number of responsive documents. It is unlikely that the agency will begin a serious review of our response until sometime following the 2001 holiday season. Based on our meeting in Washington, we do not expect a quick response in 2002 because the Water Enforcement Division has an extremely busy agenda and a small staff, which likely will preclude them from focusing solely on our response. In addition, we know that the agency sent out a similar information request to the Williams Companies. Thus, we do not expect a response from EPA until late spring-mid summer of 2002 at the earliest.

PROCESS -- After we submit our response to the information request, EPA could respond in several ways:

(1) The agency could request a meeting to discuss the materials submitted on November 7, 2001 or send out another request seeking additional information. We will be prepared to respond to any such request. (This is a fairly likely scenario)

(2) Either before or after requesting additional information, EPA could issue a notice of violation and begin some type of administrative enforcement action. This could take the form of a compliance order and administrative civil penalty (all internal to the agency) or a consent decree with an order entered by a federal court. An order could include a fine, required pipeline maintenance activities, and/or stipulated penalties for future discharges or releases. Although the differences with our situation appear to be significant, EPA recently settled an enforcement action with Koch Industries for oil spills from its pipeline system for $30 million. Under an enforcement action, we would attempt to negotiate the terms of the order with the agency and hopefully minimize the size of any proposed fine. We also believe that our actions (principally those of ETS as operator of the EOTT pipeline system) between now and the time of the agency's response will be helpful in attempting to mitigate any fine or course of action proposed by the agency. (This is also a fairly likely scenario)

(3) If our response is particularly troublesome to EPA, the agency could turn the matter over to the Department of Justice. Before this scenario would unfold; however, the agency likely would conduct additional inquiries (e.g., more focused information requests and employee interviews). This scenario would be most problematic because it likely would unfold only if the government (EPA and DOJ) consider the alleged violations extremely serious and possibly systematic. (Although possible, this is a less likely scenario)

If you have any additional questions, don't hesitate to contact me (3-7267).


raincheck?


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:52 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
05/09/2000 06:07 PM
To:	Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: East Side Prospects: Bammel Compression Options

Greg,

I am short traders this week and Schwieger is out until Thursday afternoon.  Is there any way that we can move this meeting to Friday afternoon.  Jim and I would like to be involved but we can not make it Wednesday morning.  If the meeting can not be changed then Ed will go in our behalf.

Thanks,
Tom

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Chris,

I attached a simple sheet outlining our basic process of decremental bidding.  From a Real-Time standpoint we are ready to implement this process immediately.  I believe we have the tools in place to capture the revenue on the volume management side as well.  Kourtney Nelson is out of the office today but will return on Monday.  I feel we should involve her in the process when she returns.  Overall, this is very similar to what we did last summer and should be relatively easy to implement.  Feel free to see me with questions.

Thanks,
Bill


I'm helping Jay out with this one and another that I'll send to you:

Forest Oil Relationship

Forest Oil Corporation

No master agreements
Physical Gas with ENA Upstream Company LLC (GISB 96021367 and GTC's)
Physical Gas with ENA (GTC)
Financial Products with ENA (GTC)
Crude and other with ERAC   (GTC)

Guaranties:
	Outgoing - $30mm covering ENA and ERAC for benefit of Forest Oil Corporation
	Covers physical delivery and MTM for natural gas and crude products

Producers Marketing Ltd.

Physical Gas with ECC (master 96013847)

Guaranties:
	Incoming - $10mm CAD from Forest Oil Corporation for benefit of ECC
	Covering physical gas MTM.

	Outgoing - $10mm CAD from Enron Corp covering ECC
	Covers physical gas MTM


Jaques,

After meeting with George and Larry, it was clear that we have different
definitions of cost and profit.  Their version includes the salary of a
superintendent and a junior superintendent as hard costs equivalent to third
party subs and materials.  Then there is a layer of "construction management"
fees of 10%.  There are some small incidental cost that they listed would be
paid out of this money.  But I think the majority of it is profit.  Finally
the builders profit of 1.4 million.

Keith and I were not sure whether we would be open to paying the supers out
of the cost or having them be paid out of the builders profit.  After all, if
they are the builders why does there need to be two additional supervisors?
We were definitely not intending to insert an additional 10% fee in addition
to the superintendent costs.  George claims that all of these costs have been
in the cost estimates that we have been using.  I reviewed the estimates and
the superintendents are listed but I don't think the construction management
fee is included.

George gave me some contracts that show how these fees are standard.  I will
review and let you know what I think.

The GP issues don't seem to be a point of contention.  They are agreeable to
the 3 out 4 approval process.

Let me know if you have opinions or sources that I can use to push for  only
true costs + 1.4 million.

Phillip


Joe,

Attached is the Curtail200206.db file. I have a question about a sequence of
events. For turbine 840006029 on June 19th the turbine is "Energy curtailed"
(Index = 10843), THEN it has the message "Turbine Com Established" (Index =
10855). Then there are no other messages (for that turbine) until a "Energy
curtailed" message (Index = 11134).

Is there anything I can assume about the time between the curtailment
messages? For example, was the turbine uncurtailed when the com established
message was recorded? Or are did the turbine become uncurtailed and no
message was recorded?

Thanks,
Mark


Edmund, thanks for that A&O summary.  Is anyone recommending any change in
the ISDA agreement or schedules?  Hopefully this fact scenario would never
apply to Enron.

Mark


Jeff: As we discussed, please send me your's and Steve Kane's presentations.
Thanks.  Ron


info per yor request

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Friday, June  8, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	New Jersey volumes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ma, Felicia
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: CPR request

Kam,

Please find attached excel spread sheet.

Felicia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Ma, Felicia
Subject:	CPR request

John Hodge requested some information from Scott Neal.

He would like to see the # of counterparties we did physical trades with in the year 2000 and the volumes by month (sales) in New Jersey.

There are two Notional curves (locations) that are in New Jersey.  IF-TETCO/M3 and TRANSCO/Z6NONNY.

I cannot find any old files from Nagesh but I just need to see the volumes for the year and the number of counterparties.  I don't need to see the counterparty names just the number of counterparties for the year.


This request has been pending your approval for  2 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000010092&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000010092
Request Create Date : 12/12/00 3:00:54 PM
Requested For       : diane.goode@enron.com
Resource Name       : Westlaw
Resource Type       : Applications


Esther,

Thanks for forwarding documents for Sally.  She is also interested in Chicago
- are there Chicago documents you can also forward to her?

Thanks,
Patti x39106


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."


Start Date: 4/6/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040619.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred: 871.00 / Final: 850.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: APX1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred:   9.99 / Final:   9.77)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


This evening, ECT faxed comments to counterparty's proposed ISDA to both John
Joel and Douglas Marshall.  We also resent the Credit Support Annex because
counterparty never commented on ours and failed to include one.  John Joel
called me this morning to determine when the lawyers could speak.  I told him
to schedule a conference call because ECT was ready and was faxing comments
today.  I haven't heard from him.  SS


On July 1st, Project Apollo and Beyond launched its final SAP implementation.
Enron now has an integrated, common financial, human resources, procurement,
and project management system throughout the majority of Enron's businesses.
By far Enron,s largest SAP implementation, this &go live8 added approximately
8500 new users ) raising the total user population from Apollo and Beyond
implementation efforts to over 13,000 Enron employees and contractors.

A highlight of this implementation was the rollout of eHRonline, an
intranet-based system that enables individuals to manage their personal
information and time management activities plus view their pay information
and benefit elections.  This new system gives the power and capability for
managing your information to the person who knows the most about it ) YOU!

The Apollo and Beyond solution will yield savings of over $30 million per
year plus provide increased speed and accuracy of information.  Once
post-implementation efforts have been successfully completed, the focus will
turn to system support, enhancements, and additional projects to help
leverage Enron's SAP system for increased growth and profitability.

Many thanks to the HR, financial, project and procurement communities for
their efforts towards the vision of +One Enron,!

For questions or assistance, please contact Enron,s SAP support organization
at 713-345-4SAP.


I have a call into Jo Williams for her to give me more info on the meeting.
I do plan on attending, unless you hear from me otherwise.

MVE

Daren J Farmer
05/16/2000 04:20 PM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting Confirmation - May 18

Mike,

This is what I was talking about in our staff meeting.  Let me know if you
can make this.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------
MEETING CONFIRMATION

From: Rosemary Gracey@ENRON on 05/16/2000 03:34 PM
To: Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Martha Sumner-Kenney/NPNG/Enron@ENRON,
Richard Shepherd/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, David Hultsman/Houston/Eott@Eott, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Will Zamer/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beth Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meeting Confirmation - May 18

TOPIC(S): "New" Enron Website
 DATE: Thursday, May 18
LOCATION: EB4102 in Houston/ Rm 696 in Omaha
TIME: 1:30-2:30 pm

For questions, please call Jo Williams X7707.


Kay

Here is an overview of what projects are active:

1.  Midway - Greg Krause

The hot item is a Property Owners Association Agreement that will be entered
into between Midway Development Company, L.L.C. ("MDC") and Cooney-Midway
Groves (the owner of the property on which MDC has an option to purchase).
The agreement will not be entered into or effective until MDC has given
notice it will proceed with the project (and, thus, we control the trigger).
I have asked Chris Boehler at A&K to turn a redline draft that incorporates
changes that Greg and I discussed last week with he and Darren Inoff.   David
Layman at Greenburg Traurig (our Florida counsel) also needs to incorporate
some changes now that the platting has been done.  Chris is to send his
redline to Greg, David and you.  David is to make his additions and then send
a composite to Greg, you and Chris.  This will probably take a week or so and
then it can go to the counterparty when everyone on our side is in agreement
with the changes.  The biggest issue we have right now is that Cooney-Midway
Groves wants to maintain control over the property as long as they own an
interest in one of the tracts and we are not willing to allow that when we
will own 2/3 of the property but have less than 1/2 of the vote.  This is
because the agreement is designed to give one vote to each acre.  There are
three tracts, of which CM will own one and MDC will own 2, but the 3rd tract
is not alloted any votes since it must remain undeveloped land for a
retention pond.

Chris is also working on some title commitment letters for the option we just
secured from Clyde Thompson and Paul Freeman.  There's no rush on those and
can definitely wait until I get back.

2.  Pompano - Steve Krimsky

Pompano has 2 issues that are hot.

1.  The infamous Developer's Agreement.  Debbie has turned another draft and
has asked that we bless it before Thursday so that she can go visit with the
city attorney on Friday.  The hearing in Pompano is scheduled for the evening
of June 12 and you have indicated that you will attend.  I'll send them a
note to tell them you'll be there.  We need to have a deal worked out with
the Pompano commissioners before the public meeting.  The thing to keep in
mind here is that in Pompano, unlike Deerfield, the same group that will be
approving our request for a zoning change is the same group we have to
negotiate the developer's agreement with.  Allegedly, they will settle for
$1.5 MM in annual payments.  I've laid a copy of the agreement Debbie has
prepared on your chair.

2.  In an effort to block the power plant project, Broward County has drafted
a proposed ordinance that will place a moratorium on the approval of any
power plant air permits until the matter can be studied at length.  The
problem is, they expressly do not have the power to have any say in the air
permit process.  That is expressly delegated to the Dept. of Environmental
Protection ("DEP").    However, the DEP hasn't taken the clean approach and
said they have NO authority but it has stated that BC is entitled to
reasonable rules and regulations and DEP will let them have some permit
approvals; HOWEVER, air permits for power plants are expressly not delegated
to BC.   Greenburg is probably a week away from being able to give us a legal
opinion on the likelihood that Broward County will be able to do something
that is legally defensible.  Once they started looking into this, it became
quite the legal search because at one time BC did have the authority to pass
special acts. However, in 1977 their special act authority was cut off but
the legislature ratified all rules they had in effect at that time.  After
that, they were granted charter power to adopt have such authority as a
charter county to adopt their own home rules as long as they were not
inconsistent with state or federal law or the constitution.  In 2000, they
repealed all prior acts relating to the issuance of air permits and said they
would rely on their charter power to make up their own rules.  Problem is,
the DEP has expressly not given them the right to have a say in air permits
for power plants.  Needless to say, this is sticky and icky.  My
recommendation is that we don't jump out and incur litigation costs.  Let us
get a memo together, go talk to the county attorney and show him that they
don't have the right to do this.  The hearing on adopting this ordinance is 2
p.m. on June 12, same day as the commissioner's meeting on the Developers
Agreement.  Between now and June 12, Debbie Orshefsky would like to talk to
the attorney and to the DEP.  Indications are that the DEP will strongly
support us as this could be a turf battle for them.  The county attorney may
come to his senses and advise the commission that passing such an ordinance
will be costly as it is unenforceable if challenged.  We can also ask the DEP
to issue a "declaratory statement" and it is likely that statement would say
that state law is pre-emptive and the ordinance is invalid.

This is a very, very broad brush of what is a very legislative history
intensive issue.  Debbie will be looking to you to read the memo that will
come next week and agree on a strategy on going forward.

3.  Deerfield - Steve Krimsky

Unlike Pompano where the commissioners who vote on the rezoning are the same
who vote on the developer's agreement, in Deerfield they don't have a say
over any of the approval process.  However, to facilitate coming into the
city, they expect something.  If we can agree on the form of developer's
agreement, then it would be substantially used in the same manner in
Deerfield.  In Deerfield, they have said they want 3 things:  a payment in
lieu of taxes, a landscape fund to fund upkeep of a particular street (which
is basically an adopt a street program and is required of any new business
coming into Deerfield) and they want an easement to put a cellular tower on
our property.  I've told Steve Krimsky the latter can be a headache because
if they are successful in leasing the space on the tower to third parties,
that creates a lot of traffic going across your property.  It is very
do-able, we just need to structure it correctly. I've done several radio
tower agreements and we can use those as go-bys.  They may also want a "fire
service fee" if we give one to Pompano.  There's also lots and lots of
negative publicity on a daily basis and Eric Thode is wanting to respond with
an editorial in the Sun-Sentinel.  I'll forward the most recent version they
have been sharing amongst themselves and not we lawyers.  The hearing in
Deerfield is June 8th and you may want to attend it as well.

I'll copy my notes for you.  THANK YOU for covering for me.  Here are
numbers you can send e-mails to or call and leave a message:

Walter and Marlena Schilling  011 49 8218 89351 schilling.jun@freenet.de

Monika and Bernhard Steinacher 011 49 8232 8932 m.steinacher@schwabmuenchen.de

Walter and Bernhard and Bernhard's daughter, Susanne, speak pretty good
English and Monika's isn't bad.  Marlena doesn't speak it very well so ask
for Walter.  Bavaria is 7 hours ahead of Houston.


No, I don't know her number. but Anessa is , huh!  Just call up to the church
and give them your count for dinner for the kids.


I had a brief conversation with Vicki about splitting the costs 50/50 on the
legal side to be consistent with the business arrangement.  She asked to use
the European operation as  a model.  At some point, Peter you should just
give Vicki a call and talk it through.

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	10/23/2000 01:02 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Retail Initiative

To be brief, this project is percolating but being held up on the following
fronts:

1.  ENA/EES issues.  I have not been involved so I don't know where it is
at.  As request by Dave P., Mark P. has sent a copy of his preliminary issues
memo to Vicki S.

2.  Market Achievement Plan for unsold PPAs.  The Government is expected to
announce October 31st.  This will impact the market in many aspects,
including the viability of competitive retail market options v. regulated
rate options.

3.  We have proposals from two law firms.  Donahue Ernst & Young and Blakes.
My preference would be DEY for diversification reasons, but DEY may have
unresolvable conflicts which I would have to discuss with you if we are to
proceed.  Blakes proposal may also have significant conflicts, which may be
resolvable but which may limit the effectiveness of their representation.
Nonetheless, it seems a decision will not need to be made until the end of
October.  In the meantime, Mark P. is working on scoping out legal and
compliance issues, as well as forms.

Peter.


I will request this extension at tomorrow's executive committee of the board
mtg. rick


At the risk of taking grief for having a premeeting before the premeeting before the meeting, can we talk for 15 minutes sometime today(before 5)


This deal is entered as 7 - 22, every day of the week.  Usually it is 7 -22,
M - S or 1 -24, every day of the week.  Can you check into this and let me
know if it is correct?

Thanks!


Bob Badeer
deal 306927
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598737
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598736
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs


You might as well go and play golf, I probably won't get out of here until 2 or 3

Amanda K. Huble
Gas Fundamentals
Phone: (713) 853-4384
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Fax: (713) 646-8453


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000 09:38
AM ---------------------------
To: "Raspe, Adele M." <Adele.Raspe2@pseg.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: electronic trading agmt.

Adele,

Here is a revised version.  Let me know what you think.

Mark


Thanks Steve!  df

	From:  Steve Klimesh                           03/08/2001 07:01 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Organization Announcement

Drew
Congratulations and best wishes.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Klimesh/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2001
05:07 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO                           03/07/2001 10:57
PM

Sent by: ETS General Announcement
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations
cc:

Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.;; Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.;
;
Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.; Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.
;
To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.;;
;
Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.;


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 05:49 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	07/19/2000 05:48 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 07/19/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/19/00.

Regards,
tm


Just playing with you!  Are you in a good mood?  Wednesday is definitely a hot chocolate day.  They said it was supposed to snow here....I'm still in Dallas!  I can't wait!
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


please advise if you would like a copy of this article for your review

eric
=======================
----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:56 AM -----

	webmaster@cera.com
	06/05/2001 09:01 PM

		 To: insights@cera.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: TURKEY ABOLISHES THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO IMPORT NATURAL GAS - CERA
Insight

Title: Turkey--Adding to a Crowded Market?
URL(s):
http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2471
http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2472

***********************************************************************

TURKEY ABOLISHES THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO IMPORT NATURAL GAS

The gas bill's passage into Turkish law in May has far-reaching consequences
for international power developers, liquefied natural gas (LNG) suppliers into
Turkey, and incumbent players. CERA identifies two critical consequences
emerging from the new legislation:

*  Power developers may be able to renegotiate their gas supply agreements.

*  More opportunities for LNG suppliers will emerge.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete report.

E-mail Category: Insight
CERA Knowledge Area(s): European Gas, European Power

CERA's Spring 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas are now available
at http://www20.cera.com/event

***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


I don't think she finished her thought.  I'll check with Allyson on this.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/09/2000 05:44
PM ---------------------------

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/07/2000 02:27:23 PM
To: "'Mann Kay'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>

Subject: NCNG Delivery Points

There would seem to me to be two questions--the threshold one is whether the
site is within Rocky Mount's service territory.  If it is, then what
obligation does NCNG have with respect to the construction of a delivery
point.  I haven't reviewed the annexation statutes yet, but based on my
initial reading of the Service Area Territory Agreement between Rocky Mount
and NCNG, once annexed the site would come within Rocky Mount's purview to
serve, and, although a "mutually agreeable" delivery point would have to be
negotiated, NCNG would at least have to negotiate that in good faith.

The January 13, 1992 Service Area Territory Agreement gives Rocky Mount the
right to distribute natural gas within the city's incorporated limits as
well as a specified area outside the incorporated limits.   The contract
goes on to provide that should any part of that perimeter be annexed into
the city, "the respective rights of the parties as to service in any such
portion shall be determined by applicable case law and the General Statutes
of North Carolina. . ."  The contract further provides that absent an order
of the NCUC to the contrary, NCNG agrees that Rocky Mount has the right to
serve all end users within the "aforementioned" area--presumably referring
to the annexed area, although the agreement is not a model of clarity.

So, at least based on this language, Rocky Mount's right to serve arguably
tracks its incorporated limits, whatever they might be.  (Jonathan and I are
looking at annexation law to see what else might be lurking out there).

The 1992 Service agreement provides, In Article IV, provides that points of
devliery for all natural gas purchased or transported under the agreement
with NCNG shall be "at the following locations and other stations added at
mutually agreeable locations in the future. . ." In the Third Amendment to
the Natural Gas Service Agreement, dated March 10, 1997, new language and
delivery points are negotiated upon, but the principle is still included
that  other stations may be added at "mutually agreeable locations in the
future."  The question which then arises is what Rocky Mount would have to
give in exchange.  In the 1997 agreement, Rocky Mount agreed to an extention
of terms of the of ten years, until December 6,


please take me out of my bid for kennison


I should let you know that the GTCs are identical for both products with the
exception of the Name of the product. I will follow up with you next week
about the GTC
Thanks
jr
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001
05:40 PM ---------------------------

From:  Justin Rostant
    03/30/2001 11:19 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GTC for External FX products

Mark, we are trying to have everything completed so we could launch this
product to go live on April 9th. Sara has already given us the approval on
the GTCs for these FX products for external counterparties. The products do
not have names as yet, but the FX team is working on it. Can you go ahead and
review the GTC's for these products in the mean time and I will contact you
with the names of the products as soon as we get them.
Thanks
jr

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
04:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 03/29/2001 10:09 AM
To: William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Musch/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: attachments

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


What did you think of the debate?  I thought, all in all, Bush did a good job
- mainly because he got his points and proposals across without making a fool
of himself.  Gore looked awfully fake and rehearsed on stage.  Do you think
that the American public notices that the only issue he makes is with Bush's
tax cuts going to the "wealthiest one percent".   That is the biggest load of
garbage I have ever heard-   I know Bush can't say this but, if you do the
math, the wealthiest 1% pay the most taxes notionally and proportionately to
the rest of the country.  So, if there is an across the board tax cut,
obviously the wealthiest one percent will get the most notional dollars back.

-E


We remain in the process of gathering information sought by various governmental agencies.

Please search your files and collect all records and documents covered by or relevant to the following requests:

(1)	All records relating to any investigations/review of the allegations raised by Sherron Watkins in her August memo to Ken Lay, including but not limited to:

(A) 		The review conducted by V&E in relation to which you were interviewed.
(B)		Any review conducted by AA.
(C) 	Any relevant internal Enron review.

(2)	All records from investment bankers or other financial advisors,  other than AA,  regarding the structuring, financing or accounting relating to Enron's SPEs, subsidiaries, and/or partnerships including but not limited to LJM1, LJM2, JEDI, CHEWCO, RAPTOR ENTITIES, OSPREY, BLUE DOG, and their subsidiaries.

In the context of the above requests, "records" includes, whether in electronic or hard copy form, all and any emails or regular mail/memoranda you may have sent or received, notes you may have made, documents (including drafts) on shared/hard drives, meeting notes or minutes or actual opinions/advice from any of the above sources.  A full definition provided by the government is attached hereto.

If you discover any records/documents, or if you have any questions, please contact the RAP TEAM at responseteam@enron.com or ext. x5-3723.

We appreciate that you may have received what appear to be similar requests in relation to other governmental lines of inquiry but it is very important that we respond, and are seen to respond, to each governmental request as specifically, fully and promptly as possible.

Thank you in advance for your continuing assistance in this matter.

Regards,

RAP TEAM

ATTACHMENT

1.	The term "records" is to be construed in the broadest sense and shall mean any written or graphic material, however produced or reproduced, of any kind or description, consisting of the original and any non-identical copy (whether different from the origianl because of notes made on or attached to such copy or otherwise); and drafts and both sides thereof, whether printed or recorded electronically or magnetically or stored in any type of data bank, including, but not limited to, the following:  correspondence, memoranda, records, summaries of personal conversations or interviews, minutes or records of meetings or drafts, contracts, agreements, puchase orders, invoices, confirmations, telegraphs, telexes, agendas, books, notes, pamplets, periodicals, reports, studies, evaluations, opinions, logs, diaries, desk calendars, appointment books, tape recordings, video recordings, e-mails, voice mails, computer tapes, or other computer stored matter, magnetic tapes, microfilm, microfiche, punch cards, all other records kept by electronic, photographic, or mechanical means, charts, photographs, notebooks, drawings, plans, inter-office communications, intra-office and intra-departmental communications, transcripts, checks and canceled checks, bank statements, ledgers, books, records or statements of accounts, and papers and things similar to any of the foregoing, however denominated.

2.	The terms "relating," "relate," or "regarding" as to any given subject means anything that consitutes, contains, embodies, identifies, deals with, or is in any manner whatsoever pertinent to that subject, including but not limited to records concerning the preparation of other records.


It is okay to set Public Service Company of Colorado up to trade US East
power pursuant to the existing master agreement.  Noel, I'll leave it to you
to let Lance know that we are modifying their profile.

Please contact me at *36121 with any questions or comments.

Leslie


Guys, do we have enough VAR to bring this position into the book?  If over
$5M in total exposure it has to go to Frevert/Whalley.

John, I assume that you have gone through the transaction and have approved.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Janice R Moore
02/01/2001 09:06 AM
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron,
John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, LaCrecia Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Zachary
Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Draft DASH for CMP Standard Offer Deal

And here's the risk memo on this deal.  Still in draft form and based on the
state of play at the moment.

Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)

	Janet R Dietrich
	01/31/2001 04:34 PM

		 To: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, LaCrecia
Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Draft DASH for CMP Standard Offer Deal

John, thanks for the update. I sat down with John Lavorato and Dana Davis
this morning to review the deal and get John's approval under the current
terms. He has approved the deal in it's current form however, to the extent
that we have any material change in the terms I'll need to be sure he's OK
with the changes in advance of any binding committment with Central Maine.
This is definitely a deal we want to do and given the anticipated
acceleration in the negotiations and possible execution, we need to be sure
that we're able to react and transact quickly. Dana Davis is obviously on
point for all pricing. For all others who have involvement here - please
ensure that you're on board with your piece of the deal as is, and available
to focus on any negotiated changes that may come up over the next couple of
days. Berney Aucoin will be on point for coordinating and managing all
internal pricing, approvals, etc., so be sure that Bernie can get ahold of
you if he needs to.

Also, for the DASH signatures, why don't you move both Kevin and I to
"Regional Management" and let Ader and Davis sign for Origination and
Trading.

Thanks and good luck!
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
03:51 PM ---------------------------

John Llodra@ENRON
01/31/2001 11:50 AM
To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market
Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice
R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, LaCrecia
Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft DASH for CMP Standard Offer Deal

All:

As some of you may be aware, we are in the process of negotiating with
Central Maine Power Company regarding the assumption of a portion of their
wholesale obligations associated with their Standard Offer Service load in
the State of Maine, covering at least March 1, 2001 - Feb 28, 2002.   We are
currently in the process of negotiating a contract and transaction terms.
They are simultaneously discussing same with other suppliers.  At this point,
there are a number of outstanding items (including numerous contract items
and credit arrangements).  However, we expect that the pace of the
negotiation process will be very quick over the next 1-3 days.   As an
example of how quickly things might move, CMP has indicated that the Maine
PUC is poised to hold deliberations and approve CMP's signing of a contract
within 24 hours of CMP/Enron agreement on contract terms (with updated firm
pricing to be supplied just prior to PUC deliberations and held open for
about 2-3 hours).

Key members of our negotiating team on this deal are as follows:

Origination/Marketing:  John Llodra, George Wood
Legal:  Janice Moore
Regulatory/Governmental:  Daniel Allegretti
Commodity Structuring:  Jim Meyn, Zach Sampson
Credit:  Edward Sacks, Tracy Ngo

Attached below is a draft of the DASH for this prospective deal.  Items
subject to change or still under negotiation are noted.   While this DASH is
prepared assuming we obtain a multi-year extension swaption, there is a
chance it may end up being a single year deal for the period Mar 1, 01- Feb
28, 02.   My intent in sending the DASH at this time is to familiarize you
all with the aspects of the deal at this point in time, to enable us to move
quickly to get internal approvals in the event we reach final agreement with
CMP over the next couple of days.  Once agreement is reached with CMP on
outstanding items, a revised DASH will be circulated.  Please feel free to
call me at 978-449-9936, or Jim Meyn/Berney Aucoin in structuring (5-3223,
3-4784) if you have any questions on the commercial structure or valuation to
date.  Thanks.

Regards
John


STEVE KEAN

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, April 23rd
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person ____X___

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
April 20th

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


Start Date: 10/17/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 02:56 PM -----

	John Malowney/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/14/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: ISDA

Sara, some time ago we forwarded Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) an ISDA for their
review and consideration.  They have responded with the following comments.
Can you give me a hand in addressing them?  John

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Roger Dieringer" <Roger.Dieringer@LPCorp.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Roger+20Dieringer+22+20+3CRoger+2EDieringer+40LPCorp+2Ec
om+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Malowney, John
Subject: ISDA

John,

Listed  below are several issues we need to have addressed prior to signing
the  agreement!

1)  Curt Stevens name is consistently  misspelled throughout the documents.
We should also be sure that our new  corporate address is used.  805 SW
Broadway, Suite 1200,  Portland, Oregon 97205-3303.

2)  Enron doesn't like late payments or early termination of their
agreements.  Interest on amounts owing is compounded daily.  John - this
needs to be changed.  What other decent  arrangements can be put in here.  (I
thought only loan sharks compounded  daily?)

3)  Part 3 of the Schedule to the Master Agreement should be amended to
provide that  LP may satisfy its obligation to provide updated financial
information by  posting it to EDGAR or on the web. Enron now has that
ability.

4) We  don't have the 1991 ISDA Definitions or the 1993 ISDA Commodity
Derivatives  Definitions cited in Parts 5 and 6 of the Schedule to the Master
Agreement. I  wasn't able to locate them on the web. We will need these
provide  to LP.

5) The  Credit Support Annex is designed to apply to ISDA Agreements subject
to New York  law. Our Agreement is subject to Texas law. We may not have  the
proper form.

Let me know at your convenience.

Thanks
Roger


On December 26, SoCalEd filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against FERC
regarding FERC's December 15 order, asking the Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit to direct FERC to establish and order "just and reasonable cost-based
rates" for sales in the California ISO and PX markets.  SoCal requests that
the Court act by January 5.

SoCal argues that its lenders have said that unless FERC acts immediately to
"restore creditor confidence" in SoCal's ability to repay its loans, that
SoCal will not be able to access additional funding, so that by mid-January
SoCal will be unable to buy electricity, resulting in rolling blackouts to
its customers.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like a faxed copy of
the petition.

Sarah


That's true, but we're trying to find substantive reasons for having the
meeting....

	Susan J Mara
	07/10/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?

Paul specifically told us to have one

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	Joseph Alamo
	07/10/2001 09:41 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan
Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weekly Staff meeting?

Did you folks want to try to have a Staff meeting/call this week?
or would you rather let it go until Paul returns?

Pls advise,
Thanks,
Joseph


To alert you to another item that may arise:  Some industrials have air
permits that restrict them to running for self-supply backup generation
only.  In such case, the air permit may have to be amended by the industrial
before it can sell to the grid.  Feel free to call upon Gov't Affairs if you
have a question about this.

Christi L Nicolay
05/01/2001 05:28 AM
To:
cc:

Subject: Interconnection: Easier for EPMI/EES to purchase from industrials

*****Please note that with the authorization below, interconnection issues
with the attached utility still need to be addressed.  (This includes
agreement, queue, facilities if needed, etc.)  Call us if you need
assistance.  Thanks.

Attached is FERC authorization for EPMI and EES to purchase power from
industrials NATIONWIDE (effective March 6, 2001--Does not expire).  The
industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer license from FERC
(subject to EPMI and EES making certain after the fact quarterlty filings for
the industrials).

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations and used
primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public utilities"
subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at wholesale) can sell
power at wholesale from such facilities to EPMI and EES without prior notice
under section 205 of FPA (would usually require 60 day advance notice
filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff.

West Desk:  This is similar to the authorization that FERC gave last week to
purchases from industrials in WSCC.

____________________________________
On April 27, FERC issued an order granting EPMI and EES the authority to
purchase power from IPPs at market-based rates.  As the attached order
indicates, the effective date of the EPMI and EES rate schedules is March 6,
2001.

 - ER011394.wpd
 - ER011394.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hoang, Charlie; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report--10/31/01


hello all,

We have been asked by this customer to review certain credit language
included within three confirmations for accuracy and possible amendment.  I
have reviewed the terms and they are not exactly consistant perhaps with what
was agreed to in principle.  Therefore, I am requesting three new
confirmations be executed that effectively replace the original confirmations
and send them to the customer.  Let me know if I can explain further.

TAG ND4986.1

Please amend the independant amount figure to specify $216,000 instead of
$220,000.

TAG NE0432.1

Please insert independant amount language into the confirm.  The independant
dollar amount should specify $8,500.

TAG NE4771.1

Please amend the independant amount figure to specify $39,000 instead of
$47,500.

Thanks
Brant


Steve, great letter and arguement, I think the more public we can be on this
one the better.

Thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000
01:10 PM ---------------------------
From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 10/31/2000 08:34 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Hoecker letter

The attached letter is being delivered this morning to the FERC
commissioners.  Since the letter concerns a matter currently pending before
the commission it will also be served on the parties.  We plan to talk to the
press about it as well.  A number of other companies and organizations are
also submitting letters and we have helped prepare an EPSA filing which
focusses specifically on California.  Our best information at this point is
that the FERC staff report regarding California is generally accurate, and
therefore, favorable.  While it will mention periodic exercises of market
power, it is expected to lay blame for California's woes at the feet of
California's own decisions about market structure.  It is further expected
that the report will not provide a basis for ordering refunds.  On the other
hand, the Commission's order (to be considered tomorrow along with the
staff's report) is expected to at least put refunds on the table for comment
and to discuss, and perhaps implement, further price caps.  This is just our
best guess at this point.  the Commission has put special emphasis on putting
the report and order under wraps until wednesday.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 07:24 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	10/30/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Hoecker letter


Directions to Sienna Plantation
1-10 to the Sam Houston tollway south, go south.  Stay on the Sam Houston
tollway past Hwy 59 and exit South Main (Hwy 90) and turn right to Murphy
Road.  Turn left onto Murphy Road and stay on Murphy Road until you get to
Hwy 6 and then turn left.  Take Hwy 6 to Sienna Parkway and turn right onto
Sienna Parkway.  Go approximately three miles and after you go over the
railroad tracks turn right onto Sienna Trace.  You will see the courts after
you turn onto Sienna Trace. The early lines start at 7:30 and it will take at
least 1 hour to get there so anyone interested in leaving from the club
should meet at 6:15, please.  Beth is the only person playing at 8:15 but I
am staying until she is finished so anyone wishing to stay can catch a ride
home.
Lisa


<http://rs6.net/on.jsp?t=1010961261031.1010945480759&o=http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/p1x1.gif>We welcome you to download <http://www.pmaconference.com/PMAPE3.6.pdf> a free trial issue of New Power Executive, the market's leading weekly on market intel, trend analysis, and a host of strategic issues and ideas of direct importance to your planning and business development process.

Read by thousands of senior execs around the market, New Power Executive is has been considered a must-read publication since 1997.

These four free issues you'll receive over the coming weeks are free and have zero obligation. However, if you choose to formally subscribe during this trial you can save $150 off the regular rate. See the order form on page 5. Enjoy!

This email was sent to scorman@enron.com, by PowerMarketers.com <http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=hpiz4qn6.xbwxqqn6.9arrsqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerMarketers.com>.
Visit our Subscription Center to edit <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=scorman@enron.com> your interests or unsubscribe <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=scorman@enron.com>.
View our privacy policy <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp>.

Powered by
Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=tccst>


John.  SW Market was $175 @ $225 during these hours.  I put these deals in @
$200.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 03:23 PM -----

	Mike Fowler@ENRON
	09/14/2000 10:21 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: BuySideDirect - Outstanding Issues

My understanding is that the following issues are outstanding with regard to
the Buy Side Direct agreements:

Buy Side Direct Agreement:

Notice - Sara is developing proposed guidelines for notification (how + who
should receive).

Indemnity (#6) - Jason and Sara will discuss.

I would encourage you to discuss these issues without me unless you prefer
that I participate.

Weiss, Peck & Greer Agreement:

Fees:  We will not be assessed any fees from WPG.  Thus, I suggest that
section 9 state this, or be removed.

Margin:  Section 14 should note that margin for our transactions through Buy
Side Direct would be maintained at our prime broker.  WPG would only request
margin if our prime broker disaffirms a trade.

Mike Minnich noted that WPG had agreed to our other comments.  Have we
received a revised WPG agreement with these changes ?

As noted below, I have asked Sheila to provide information required for the
BSD and WPG agreements.

Please let me know if there are other issues which I should be involved in
discussing.

Thanks.

Mike
x39990

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 09/14/2000
10:03 AM ---------------------------

Mike Fowler
09/14/2000 08:46 AM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com, Tom
Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Eric Tipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: BuySideDirect Agreement

It appears that we are close to resolving outstanding legal issues regarding
the agreement to allow online bond trading through Buy Side Direct.   Sheila,
is your group the appropriate area to complete the Subscriber Application and
Attachment 2 documents provided below ?

We will also execute an agreement with Buy Side Direct's clearing firm
(Weiss, Peck & Greer) which will direct them to clear our trades through the
prime broker we designate.    Sheila, I will leave you a paper copy of the
preliminary version of this agreement.  Is your group the appropriate area to
complete the information this agreement requires on pages 7 and 8 -
essentially, tax ID # and account # ?

Eric / Tom, please handle any communication required with our prime broker
required before we initiate trading on Buy Side Direct.

Sara / Jason, please let me know if I am overlooking any other information
that we will require from Sheila's group related to Buy Side Direct.

(Approval from our Credit group is expected this week.)

Thanks.

Mike
x39990

To: <Mike.Fowler@enron.com>
cc: <jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>, <sara.shackleton@enron.com>,
"Lisa@Buysidedirect. Com" <lisa@buysidedirect.com>

Subject: RE: Enron-BuySideDirect Agreement

I made the two remaining changes:

1. added limits on clearly erroneous policy time limits.  We will promptly
notify other side and will make a decision within 4 hours of the issue being
raised or by 6PM whichever is sooner.
2. deleted first sentence from 5.4

I am still trying to get further resolution from WPG with regard to your
insert #6.

Please call with any questions.

Regards,

Mike
415-369-5016
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 09/14/2000
08:13 AM ---------------------------

"Michael Minnich" <minnich@imarkets.com> on 09/12/2000 07:00:10 PM
Please respond to <minnich@imarkets.com>
To: <mike.fowler@enron.com>, <jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>,
<sara.shackleton@enron.com>
cc: "Lisa@Buysidedirect. Com" <lisa@buysidedirect.com>,
<minnich@imarkets.com>

Subject: Enron-BuySideDirect Agreement

I apologize for the delay.  I made the changes as discussed except:

1.  I did not put a limit on the Clearly erroneous policy--not because I
didn't agree, but because I did not see an obvious answer in the Nasdaq
agreement.  I will look at it more tomorrow, but I wanted to get this to you
rather than delay further.
2.  Striking first sentence in 5.4--I have not heard back from our lawyers.
Hopefully tomorrow.

Also, I attach the broker dealer attachment 2 which you said you didn't
have.

I think we resolved most of your WPG questions.  WPG is OK with all of your
changes except Insert 6.  I will try to get further resolution as to why
they object so that you can negotiate further if you like.

If all goes well, hopefully this can be wrapped up tomorrow.

Regards,

Mike

___________________________________________
BuySideDirect LLC a subsidiary of
Intelligent Markets, Inc.

410 Jessie Street, Suite 602
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 369-5016 direct
(415) 369-5020 sales
(415) 369-5010 fax
minnich@imarkets.com

 - Enron BuySideDirect Subscriber Application, Version August 25, 2000.doc
 - BuySideDirect Attachment 2.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 02/03/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

troy_a_benoit@reliantenergy.com on 02/03/2000 07:53:41 AM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Increase into Midcon

(See attached file: HPL-Feb.xls)

 - HPL-Feb.xls


The attached press release announcing a gas sales agreement between Metgas
and RCF was reviewed and approved in March, but the release was postponed.
The GSA is expected to be signed next week, and we would like to issue the
release in Mumbai.  If you have any questions or comments, please let me know
by Monday, June 12.

Thank you.
kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
09:28 PM ---------------------------
From: John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/07/2000 03:06 PM
To: Mark Palmer@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne@ENRON

Subject: Signing of GSA between Metgas and RCF - Press Release / Q&As

Mark,

You may recall that the GSA between Metgas and RCF, a Govt. of India owned
fertilizer company, was postponed at the last moment in March (please refer
to below e-mail). The Metgas marketing team is cautiously optimistic that the
GSA could now be signed next week, perhaps June 14.  An India only press
release was approved by the India team and Corp. in March but as that was 10
weeks ago,  I wanted to ensure that this action is still approved.   Please
let me know if you have any questions."

Thanks,

John

---------------------- Forwarded by Johan Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
06/01/2000 03:09 PM ---------------------------

Johan Zaayman
03/22/2000 05:31 PM
To: Steven J Kean@EES, Mark Koenig@ENRON, Paula Rieker@ENRON, Peter
Berger@ECT, Mark Palmer@ENRON
cc: Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Signing of GSAs with RCF and Ispat during President Clinton's visit
to India - Press Releases

Please be advised that we will not be signing the GSA with RCF this week. The
signing had been planned for Thursday in New Delhi but apparently the
Chairman of RCF is ill and his Board could not meet in time to give final
approval to the deal. We will now sign at a later date.

We are still on track to sign the GSA with Ispat on Friday evening in Mumbai.
The Shareholders Agreement will also be signed but the PPA will follow
several days later. Only a press release for the Ispat deal will therefore be
released on Friday, in India only.

I will keep you informed of any new developments.

Thanks,

Johan


Jeffrey, after our discussion yesterday regarding the descriptions of the
particular generators in the CPCN application, I had a discussion with Tom
Lam, one of the Public Staff engineers, regarding your concerns.  As I had
suggested, they understand what the reference to the 188 MW encompasses.
Also, there would be no problem with substituting different generator sets
for the LM 6000s if there is an economy/efficiency basis for it and
reliability is not impaired.

He went on to say that he saw no problem with the CPCN Application from an
engineering perspective.  As far as the engineers are concerned, North
Carolina Power needs the power and they are pleased that the generation is
going to be built in North Carolina.  He expects the bulk of the questions
regarding the project to come from the Accounting Division, and most of
those will be directed to North Carolina Power and to be focused on the RFP
process.

The Public Staff has three divisions that investigate and analyze
applications--Engineering, Accounting and Economic Research.  Typically,
each section sends out separate data requests.  I will be calling around
over the next two or three days to see what questions might be surfacing
from the other divisions.

> Confidentiality Note:
> This email message is intended solely for the individual or individuals
> named above. It contains confidential attorney-client privileged
> information and attorney work product.  If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or
> distribute it or any of the information it contains.  Please delete it
> immediately and notify us by return email or by telephone (404) 815-6500.
>


FYI.  We also had Mckinsey  look at the soda ash market for us.  Not as
compelling as we though, but interesting anyway...

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
11:00 AM ---------------------------

Suzanne_Nimocks@mckinsey.com@mckinsey.com on 12/13/2000 10:47:24 AM
Sent by: Carol_Benter@mckinsey.com
To: jeff.shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Global glass market overview

Here is a quick overview of teh glass market.  We can put something
together with more detail over the next couple of weeks if you would like.

(See attached file: 01211 doc 1 enx119.ppt)

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 - 01211 doc 1 enx119.ppt


NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: NEAL WEINBERG on PRODUCT REVIEW OF THE WEEK
Today's Focus: Videoconferencing picture clears up
03/14/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~This newsletter sponsored
by W. Quinn ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How to Regain The 30% of NT/2000 Server Space That's Wasted
FREE! Get a grip on spiraling disk consumption and regain 30% or more
of your site,s enterprise storage capacity. WQuinn's StorageCeNTral
lets you: Monitor, track and control user disk consumption; identify &
remove old files that clutter your drives; and control what types of
files your users can write to your servers.
Get a grip on your NT/2000 storage space -- FREE eval:
http://www3.nwfusion.com/click;1022753;0;0;2;0;?http://nww1.com/go/1022753.htm
l
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copy and paste URLs that break in two lines and remove extra spaces.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's Focus: Videoconferencing picture clears up
---------------------------------------------------------------
By Neal Weinberg

If you,ve been turned off by the jumpy frames and poor audio quality
associated with real-time videoconferencing, the Reviewmeister has good
news for you.  There,s a new generation of videoconferencing end-point
devices that provide business-quality pictures and sound for under
$12,000.

We grabbed a box of popcorn and tested eight videoconferencing systems,
using 384K bit/sec ISDN and IP connections.

In the category of videoconferencing appliances  that is, standalone
systems that go in a conference room for group video sessions with
colleagues or business partners  Polycom,s ViewStation MP was the
clear winner.

The Polycom ViewStation provided outstanding video and audio quality.
In addition, it was easy to install, configure and use.

In the category of PC-based products, which are especially good for
virtual collaboration from your desktop, VCON,s MC800 was the hands-
down winner, based on its high-quality components.

The beauty of these products is they allow you to have a real-time
video image of the person you,re conferencing with in one corner of
the screen, with the rest of the space available for data collaboration.

If you,re in the market for a system, be sure to get one with a Sony
EVI D30/31 video camera; an unidirectional boundary microphone, like
the Audio Technica; and a quality sound mixer. And look for remote
administration and system management tools. For example, the
ViewStation allows you to upgrade software, change settings, or change
address book entries directly from the administrator,s system.

Most systems will allow you to transmit over ISDN or IP, but we found
performance over IP was dragged down by IP,s overhead requirements. For
the complete product review, go to:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0313rev.html

Of course, there,s more to videoconferencing than end points, so we
whipped up an implementation guide that lays out the network topology,
bandwidth and quality-of-service issues.
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0313rev2.html

Based on our testing, the Reviewmeister says now is the time to start
pilot-testing a videoconferencing system. Your chief information
officer will love it when you tell him you can slash your company,s
airline and hotel bills because you,ve got people from all over the
company in virtual rather than face-to-face meetings.

Next week: We loaded Windows 2000 on a PC and a server and ran Gigabit
Ethernet to the desktop. Guess where the bottleneck was?

To contact Neal Weinberg:
----------------------
Neal Weinberg is features editor at Network World, in charge of product
reviews, Buyer's Guides, technology primers, how-tos, issue-oriented
feature stories and the Technology Insider series. You can reach him at
mailto:nweinber@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Videoconferencing picture clears up, Network World, 03/13/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0313rev.html

But implementation is still fuzzy, Network World, 03/13/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0313rev2.html

How we did it, Network World, 03/13/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0313how.html

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,
go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to this
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


Vince,
I have the information you requested concerning Spyros Maragos. Please call
me at your convenience.

Paul Johnson
(281) 497-8595


Sally,

Congratulations on your promotion. . .it is well deserved!  You have been
such a big influence in my career, and I sincerely appreciate all that you do.

Thanks again,
Carrie
---------------------- Forwarded by Carrie Slagle/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 10:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           01/12/2001
07:31 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Managing Director and Vice President Elections

The Managing Director PRC Committee met this week to elect individuals to
Managing Director and Vice President positions.  These employees are
recognized as outstanding contributors to the organization, whose individual
efforts have been instrumental in the continued success and growth of the
company.  We are pleased to announce the election of the following new
Managing Directors and Vice Presidents.  Please join us in congratulating
these individuals on their new appointments.

Managing Director ) Commercial

Phillip K. Allen, ENA (EWS) West Gas Trading - Houston
Franklin R. Bay, EBS Entertainment on Demand - Houston
Timothy N. Belden, ENA (EWS) ) West Power Trading - Portland
Michael R. Brown, EEL ) Executive - London
Christopher F. Calger, ENA (EWS) West Power Origination - Portland
Joseph M. Deffner, ENA (EWS) Treasury & Funding - Houston
Timothy J. Detmering, ENA (EWS) Corporate Development - Houston
William D. Duran, ENA (EWS) Generation Investments - Houston
Robert S. Gahn, EES Commodity Structuring - Houston
Kevin C. Garland, EBS Broadband Ventures - Houston
Ben F. Glisan, Jr., Corporate ) Global Equity Markets - Houston
Robert E. Hayes, ETS COMM Marketing - Houston
Phillip R. Milnthorp, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination & Trading - Calgary

Managing Director ) Commercial Support

Sally W. Beck, ENW (EWS) Energy Operations Management - Houston
Fernley Dyson, EEL Finance & Support Services - London

Vice President ) Commercial

Gregory Adams, EES MMC Management - Houston
Robert Bayley, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Jack D. Boatman, ETS Market Development ) Houston
Rhenn Cherry, EES Assets/Labor ) Houston
Niamh Clarke, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Peter Crilly, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Derek J. Davies, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Calgary
Mark D. Davis, Jr., ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
Charles Delacey, Corporate Finance ) Houston
Paul Devries, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Toronto
Christopher H. Foster, ENA (EWS) West Power Trading ) Portland
Jeffrey F. Golden, EES Corporate Development ) Houston
Michael D. Grigsby, ENA West Gas Trading Group - Houston
Troy A. Henry, EES Bundled Sales-Heavy Industrial ) Houston
Rogers Herndon, ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
James W. Lewis, EES Underwriting ) Houston
Christopher Mahoney, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Andrew Marsden, EBS Broadband Ventures ) London
John McClain, EBS Broadband Wholesale Origination ) Houston
Kevin J. McGowan, EGM (EWS) American Coal ) Houston
Albert E. McMichael, Jr., ENA (EWS) Gas Commodity Structuring ) Houston
Ermes I. Melinchon, Central America Origination ) Houston
Steven R. Meyers, EES Consumption ) Houston
Lloyd D. Miller, ENA (EWS) Portfolio Management ) Houston
Michael A. Miller, Wind Development / Execution-General Administration )
Houston
Marcello Romano, EBS EEL-Broadband Trading ) London
David A. Samuels, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline - Houston
Per A. Sekse, EGM (EWS) Global Risk Markets ) New York
Edward S. Smida, EBS Video on Demand ) Houston
Mark Tawney, EGM (EWS) Weather Trading ) Houston
Jon Thomsen, EBS Business Development ) Latin America/Canada ) Portland
Barry L. Tycholiz, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination - Houston
Frank W. Vickers, ENA (EWS) East Gas Origination ) Houston
Amit Walia, Corporate, Corporate Development ) Houston
William White, EBS Global Bandwidth Risk Mgmt ) Houston
Jonathan Whitehead, EEL EA Trading ) Japan
Mark Whitt, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination ) Denver
John A. Zufferli, ENA (EWS) Canada Power Trading - Calgary

Vice President ) Commercial Support

Beth Apollo, EEL Financial Operations Executive ) London
Marla Barnard, EBS Human Resources ) Houston
Karen L. Denne, Corporate, Public Relations ) Houston
Georganne M. Hodges, ENA (EWS) Trading, Origination & Power Plant Accounting
) Houston
Phillip Lord, EEL Transaction Support ) London
Peggy Mahoney, EES Marketing ) Communication ) Houston
Steven Montovano, Corporate, Government & Regulatory Affairs ) Dublin
Laura Scott, ENA (EWS) Canada Accounting ) Calgary
Richard C. Sherman, ENA (EWS) Transaction Support ) Houston
Gregory W. Stubblefield, EES Financial Planning & Reporting ) Houston
Dennis D. Vegas, CALME International Public Relations ) Houston

Vice President ) Specialized Technical

Sami Arap Sobrinho, ESA (EWS) Legal ) Houston
Merat Bagha, EBS Sales Engineering ) Houston
Justin Boyd, EEL Legal ) London
Mary Nell Browning, EBS Legal ) London
Jonathan Chapman, EEL Legal ) London
Robert D. Eickenroht, Corporate, Legal ) Houston
Mark Evans, EEL Legal ) London
David Forster, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline ) Houston
Janine Juggins, EEL Tax ) London
Peter C. Keohane, ENA (EWS) Canada Legal ) Calgary
Pinnamaneni V. Krishnarao, ENA (EWS) Research Group ) Houston
Travis C. McCullough, ENA (EWS) Finance Origination, Mergers/Acquisitions )
Houston
Michael Popkin, ESA (EWS) SA- Risk Management/Network Integration ) Houston
Elizabeth A. Sager, ENA (EWS) Physical Trading ) Houston
Richard B. Sanders, ENA (EWS) Litigation ) Houston
John W. Schwartzenburg, EECC Legal ) Houston
Michael D. Smith, EES Legal ) Houston
Marcus Vonbock Und Polach, EEL Legal ) London
Jay C. Webb, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline Systems ) Houston

Vice President ) Technical

Donald R. Hawkins, ETS Quality Management ) Houston
John R. Keller, ETS Engineering & Construction ) Houston


The entity should be Enron North America Corp., but I've copied Sara
Shackleton who is our in-house attorney in case I'm wrong.

Sara please let me know if anything has changed regarding the trading name we
use. Thanks.

With best regards,
Per

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Olivia Bernard" <ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk>
09/18/2000 09:05 AM

Please respond to <ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk>
To: "Per Sekse" <per.sekse@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Exact legal entity

Dear Per,

Is Enron North America the exact legal entity we should set the ISDA with ?

Cheers
Olivia Bernard
Business Manager
Global Advisors Limited
One Curzon Street
6th floor - London W1Y 7FN
+44 207 629 1117
fx : +44 207 629 0356
ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk


Hi John,
First the happier news. This is the latest  "unofficial" snow report.

On Friday , Jan traded $40
Today Dec 3,  jan traded 41, cal 2002 traded  42 and after that 41.75 ( on peak got bid up to 55.5 +/-15.2 HR bid )

 - Fernie Alpine Resort - Powder Skiing in the BC Rockies.url


---------------------- Forwarded by Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 01:21
PM ---------------------------
From: Zhiyun Yang/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/05/2001 10:09 AM CST
To: Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Min Zheng/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Song/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: Desk that has forward position as on 3/2/2001

Dear Valarie and Fran:

  I followed up with Nancy regarding  EPMI-ST-WROCK.  Based on her response,
the name won't be changed to EPMI-ST-WR but a new book called EPMI-ST-SW-EXT
will be added.  Do you plan to use that one in the future?  Please let us
know so that we can adjust other things accordingly.  Thanks.

- Zhiyun

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hernandez, Nancy
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Yang, Zhiyun
Subject: Re: Desk that has forward position as on 3/2/2001

Zhiyun:

We actually can't change the name of books, so we had to create a new book on
the RisktRAC side called EPMI-ST-WR-EXT.  However to my knowledge I think
they are still officializing the EPMI-ST-SW-EXT book.

Regarding the list below, I will let you now later today if this will work
for us.

Thanks for your help.

Nancy


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
09:24 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/14/2001 09:21 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/14/01


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007591&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007591
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:20:13 AM
Requested For       : dan.harrell@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Hi Stacey!
I wanted to thank you for spending time with me yesterday.
I am very interested in learning more about/ pursuing opportunities within your group.
Since i would have to pretty much start from scratch, wherever you have a need i would be glad to jump in.
Both the curve validation & risk positions sound very interesting to me.
Below is my availablilty over the next 2 weeks...
Please let me know who you'd like for me to sit with/ learn from/ etc. and i will be there.

Friday, 10/19- OFF
Monday, 10/22- available all day
Tuesday, 10/23- not available
Wednesday, 10/24- available after 9:30
Thursday & Friday, 10/24-5- available all day
Monday & Tuesday, 10/29-30- available all day

I will be off the 31st through the 2nd, as we are now moving (as of 4:30 yesterday!) to the green glass building behind my current unit.
We got a great deal, and saved a bunch of $$$$, so i took it.

Let me know what works for you...

Thanks!

Sunjay