count me in

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Timothy Blanchard @ EES                           01/27/2000 09:07 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, val.generes@ac.com
cc:
Subject: Astros Tickets

I am buying Astros/Yankees (Thurs. 3/30, Fri. 3/31) tickets at 9 AM
Saturday.  These are the first 2 games at the new stadium and I'm buying the
best available tickets to both games.  The maximum tickets allowed are
8/person.  Anybody in?


We have received several inquiries on the email link embedded in the
communication distributed on December 27, 2000 by Steve Kean and Cindy Olson
in reference to the PRC process.  If you have experienced problems when
clicking on this link, copy and paste the link into an email message.  We
apologize for any convenience this may have caused.  Please contact your
local IT Help desk, should you continue to have problems.
The email address to submit your ideas and suggestions is perfmgmt@enron.com


i'm in if you give me more details - i.e. where.

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
01/10/2001 01:59 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: paintball

you guys interested?

_____________________
Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 01/10/01 02:07 PM
-----

	Kenneth D'Silva@ECT
	01/10/01 11:24 AM

		 To: Vridhay Mathias/NA/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Lippert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Broadfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Paraschos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Frank Economou/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: paintball

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth D'Silva/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
11:16 AM ---------------------------

georgekissamis@marekbros.com on 01/10/2001 10:11:56 AM
To: abelramon@hotmail.com, Ratak@yahoo.com, RCardello@aol.com,
kdsilva@ect.enron.com, lannebart@yahoo.com, mrryt@sbec.com,
bflauaus@yahoo.com, margon65@yahoo.com, aeiacono@HOTMAIL.com,
sleahj@yahoo.com, karenhass@worldnet.att.net, rlmalli@yahoo.com,
McConnell_001@email.msn.com, Angela.M.Pastorino@exxonmobil.com,
redneckjmp@yahoo.com, irodrigu@ev1.net, martin.rosetta@enron.com,
valseper@sprintmail.com, Vseperuh@aol.com, vuson@ruf.rice.edu,
Lawangen@excite.com
cc:
Subject: paintball

Addendum No. 1

To whom it may concern:

It has been brought to my attention that there are some people who are
interested in playing paintball games.  However, we were going to play this
weekend but there are a lot of people who are unable to play due to
previous engagements so we are going to reschedule it for Saturday, January
20, 2001.  It will cost about $22.00 and that includes admission for the
whole day, rental of the gun and one Co2 cartridge.  However, paintballs
are extra and they cost about $6.50 per 100.  If we do end up playing it
would be recommend to bring a sandwich and drinks because there is not much
out there.

If you could, please RSVP by Wednesday, January 17, 2001, that way we can
decide if we have enough people to even play.  Rain or Shine!

Thank you,

George Kissamis


Im bored


David, has asked that I forward the following attachment which includes
Policy Options regarding the November 2nd Rod Wright meeting in Los Angeles.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Cristina
415-782-7819
415-782-7851 Fax


| http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734097 |
=====================================================================
THE INDUSTRY STANDARD'S
M E D I A  G R O K
A Review of Press Coverage of the Internet Economy
=====================================================================
=-=-=-=-=-= ADVERTISEMENT =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Keep your ebusiness
from being roadkill, see interBiz.
http://interbiz.ca.com/redirect.cfm?ID=91
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Wednesday, December 13, 2000

TOP GROKS:
* Microsoft Case Settled! No, the Other One
* Hackers Get Final Y2K Jollies
* You Can't Always Get What You Want

MORE NEWS:
* Online Trading Evolves

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

Manage the content that drives e-commerce!
Get to market quickly and deliver targeted, up-to-date Web content.
NCompass Resolution makes it easy.
Learn all about it at our next Web seminar.
http://www.ncompasslabs.com/default.htm?NLCODE=IS1

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

TOP GROKS
~~~~~~~~~
Microsoft Case Settled! No, the Other One

Some former Microsoft "permatemps" will have a little extra dough to
pay off their holiday Visa bills. Microsoft will pay about $97 million
to compensate 8,000 to 12,000 long-term temporary employees for the
stock-purchase plan they never had.

A spate of outlets ran the AP's coverage, including the allegation
that Microsoft's employment practices "once allowed employees to be
classified as temporary for as long as 14 years." (Temporary in the
Buddhist, "all is transitory" way, we assume). The average assignment
was 10 months, MS spokesperson Matt Pilla told Reuters. MS officials
also insisted that many temps don't want to go on payroll, since they
like the flexibility of temping and sometimes the pay is better. The
Washington Post and AP got some anecdotal evidence from former MS
temps who argue that most temps would rather be officially hired. As
for the money, "How many stories have you ever seen about high-tech
contractors retiring at 35 because they made millions of dollars?" a
former two-year temp asked the AP. "If I had had access to what
everyone else had, I would be in the same financial situation as a
number of friends who are already retired," another former temp
complained to TechWeb.

Not that this is all about the bucks, some former permatemps said:
Microsoft hurt their feelings. They "had to wear orange badges, while
regular employees wore blue badges" and couldn't go to office parties
or shop at the discounted company store, said the New York Times. Nor
could they use the corporate health club, added the Washington Post's
writers, who also mentioned how much the temps hated those symbolic
orange badges. "This dichotomy of treatment was a thorn in your side,"
one disgruntled former temp told the San Jose Mercury News. "You were
trying to get your job done and constantly feeling like a second-class
citizen." Sounds like the way most Microsoft techies probably went
through junior high.

To get a better sense of the eight-year legal wrangling surrounding
this case, peruse the New York Times, the Washington Post and the
Seattle Times. Basically, it comes down to this: Legal eagles say it's
not nice to employ people for more than a year and not let them into
the stock purchase plan, but temps are on their own for health
insurance. Microsoft got the hint in the mid-'90s, told contractors to
take at least 100 days off after sticking around for 12 months, let
about 3,000 employees trade their orange badges for blue ones, and
hooked up with temp agencies that provide good benefits. So maybe MS
temps get that health insurance after all, but "the company still
doesn't give temporary workers the right to purchase its stock at a
discount," said the Merc.

Several outlets stressed the importance of this case to high-tech and
the business world in general, but the Seattle Times found a
contrarian. "One thing that has been noteworthy is there haven't been
a large number of cases that have been filed (in the wake of the
Microsoft case)," said the general counsel of the American Staffing
Association. Nor will the case have "a material impact on our
results," said MS spokesman Matt Pilla. That $97 million won't make a
dent, but they can't let their contractors into the company store? -
Jen Muehlbauer

Microsoft Settles Temp Lawsuits (AP)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734100

Microsoft Settles 'Permatemp' Suits
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734101

Microsoft Settles With 'Permatemps'
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734102

Microsoft Temp Workers Win Suit
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734103
(Registration required.)

Temp Workers Win Big Against Microsoft
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734104

Microsoft, Temps Agree on $96.9 Million Payment
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734105

$97 Million for Microsoft 'Permatemp' Staffers
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734106

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hackers Get Final Y2K Jollies

The year that started with widespread paranoia and uneasiness seems
poised to end that way, too. As if wobbly tech companies weren't
enough to make everyone nervous, hackers have come out to play.

In the "clich,s come to life" department, a hacker stole a database of
credit card numbers from Creditcard.com and posted the numbers online.
Creditcards.com, a b-to-b site that helps Web retailers accept credit
card payments, told ZDNet the hacker did his deed on Monday. The
company told MSNBC, however, that the suspect broke in four months ago
and has been trying to extort Creditcards.com ever since. That wasn't
the only communications mix-up: The firm never told its customers
about the breach. Creditcards.com also claimed that there was no
evidence of credit card fraud, but MSNBC "was able to find a potential
victim within a few moments of seeing the database" - an Illinois
woman billed for $350 worth of WWF merchandise en route to the
Philippines. Here's a washcloth, Creditcards.com. You've got some egg
on your face.

In a less serious but equally embarrassing prank, a naughty photo or
two appeared on the Web site of Japan's National Police Agency. "At
this point, nothing has been concluded, only that it was not caused by
a virus," an NPA spokesperson told the AP. There's no evidence of a
break-in, said Japan's Daily Yomiuri, so maybe visitors were just
redirected to a bogus site. Nobody can agree on what sorts of
revealing photos were used, let alone the technical details.

Worry about a hack attack at the University of Washington Medical
Center - reported as early as Saturday in the Washington Post, Seattle
Times, and Wall Street Journal - ought to get new life from a piece in
Tuesday's USA Today. Not only can a successful hacker download
confidential medical information, said writer Greg Farrell, "medical
records are a veritable treasure trove for those who would make the
patients victims of identity theft." Yet another hazard of the U.S.
health-care system.

Finally, Business Week regaled its executive readership with tales of
embittered employees taking revenge via malicious hacking. "Insider
hacking" causes $1 billion in damage to U.S. businesses each year,
said Business Week's Dennis Blank, and represents 70 percent of all
attacks. Maybe Microsoft should be glad its disgruntled permatemps
only sued. - Jen Muehlbauer

CreditCards.com Database Stolen
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734107

Extortionist Targets Creditcards.com
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734108

Hacker Puts Nude Photo on Japanese Police Web Site (AP)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734109

Hacker Modifies NPA-Operated Site
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734110

Medical Records Vulnerable to ID Theft
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734111

When the Hacker Is on the Inside
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734112

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

ARE YOU READY FOR KNOWLEDGE-BASED MARKETING?
Primary Knowledge provides outsourced data warehousing and business
intelligence tools that help you focus on your most valuable customers.
We aggregate isolated silos of online data, giving you a fuller picture
of your customers. And, every morning, you are GUARANTEED access to
current intelligence and data analysis tools. So you can make decisions
based on knowledge. http://www.primaryknowledge.com?a=007008008

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

You Can't Always Get What You Want

Is that Wednesday's news theme for everyone but George Bush? Al Gore
is the most obvious choice to lead the disappointed, but techies
coming up short include Compaq and Razorfish (earnings warnings) and
Ask Jeeves (layoffs). Then there are those wireless licenses, the
auction of which produced a frenzy of interest and money in Europe but
stateside are much more modest affairs, and that's a disappointment
for the FCC.

Reporters have grown to love funky auction stories, what with online
sales of body organs and Nazi doodads on eBay. The high-priced bids on
wireless licenses, however, seem to make the media's eyes glaze over.
The Wall Street Journal reminded that wireless-license auctions raised
$30 billion in the U.K. and $40 billion-plus in Germany. The U.S.
auction, which kicked off Tuesday, is estimated to churn up a mere $15
billion to $20 billion, and a Credit Suisse First Boston analyst told
the Journal that $12 billion sounds more likely.

Part of the problem is that no one seems to quite get what's going on.
The Bloomberg posting on News.com helpfully explained that carriers
are using the auction to get additional airwaves to fill gaps in
coverage, especially in major metropolitan areas. The Journal chimed
in (eventually) that wireless companies need the airwaves to beef up
their coverage and reduce the number of pesky dropped calls. That's
why, of the 422 licenses covering 195 local markets, the hottest
action was for hopping markets such as New York, Los Angeles and
Chicago. So far the total bids are up to $501.2 million after two
rounds, the FCC told outlets. The highest bids have been $38.2 million
each by Sprint and DCC PCS, a subsidiary of Dobson Communications, for
licenses in New York City. L.A. was runner-up, with Salmon and Verizon
both bidding $25.5 million for licenses in that market.

The Financial Times blamed the absence "of ruinously expensive
spectrum auctions" on this side of the Atlantic on "the relative
backwardness of mobile telephony in the U.S." The pricey auctions in
Europe have been for fancy 3G wireless licenses, while the U.S. is
still peddling local markets. Expect "a proper 3G auction" to follow
here in two years, the peach paper wrote. A jump in third-quarter
churn rates among telco companies signals that competition is starting
to bite, the Lex Column warned. The high-priced "auction risk"
remains, Lex warned, but don't expect much. Even if you try sometimes,
you still won't get what you need. - Deborah Asbrand

Wireless Companies Bid $501.2 Million In First Two Rounds of U.S.
Auction
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734114
(Paid subscription required.)

Verizon, Cingular Are Top Bidders in Opening Day for Airwaves (Bloomberg)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734115

F.C.C. Wireless Auction Nets $501 Million on First Day  (Reuters)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734116
(Registration required.)

US Tightens Auction Rules
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734117

Lex: US Wireless
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734118

Telcel Loses Auction Bid
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734119

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

NEW PRODUCTS AND SEMINARS FROM HEWLETT PACKARD
Hewlett Packard's thinking ahead. Are you? See what's on the horizon
and what it'll mean to your business in arenas like e-services,
Always-On Infrastructure, and Internet appliances. For the calendar of
events regarding New Product Introductions and other details about
hp's services, go to:
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?H2655997803X931346

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

MORE NEWS AT THESTANDARD.COM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Online Trading Evolves
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734121

CenterSpan Scoops Up Scour for $9 Million
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734122

Microsoft Pushes Into $20 Billion Videogame Market
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734123

B-to-B Becomes Essential, Study Says
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734124

FTC Chairman Has Misgivings on AOL Deal
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734125

---------------------------------------------------------------------

MORE LINKS
~~~~~~~~~~
Compaq Cuts 4Q, 2001 Expectations
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734126

Razorfish Shares Fall Sharply in After-Hours Trading
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734127

180 Workers At Ask Jeeves Get Pink Slips
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734128

CenterSpan, With Intel Backing, Wins Scour Bankruptcy Auction
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734129

IBM to Pump $1 Billion Into Linux Next Year to Push Commercial Use
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734130
(Paid subscription required.)

AOL May Be Contender in Purchase of DirecTV
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734131

King's E-Book: It's Alive!
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734132

Will the Real Y2K Stand Up?
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734133

Airlines Surf Web for Evidence Of Plans for More Job Actions
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734134
(Paid subscription required.)

TRUSTe to Audit Health Sites
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734135

STAFF
~~~~~
Written by Deborah Asbrand (dasbrand@world.std.com), Keith Dawson
(dawson@world.std.com), Michelle Goldberg (michelle@shift.com),
Jen Muehlbauer (jen@englishmajor.com) and David Sims (davesims@sonic.net).

Edited by Jimmy Guterman (guterman@vineyard.com).

Copyedited by Jim Duffy (jduffy@thestandard.com).

GET THE MAGAZINE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4 RISK-FREE issues at this URL:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734136

GET MORE NEWSLETTERS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Industry Standard newsletters cover the media, stock market,
e-commerce, music, law and more. Enter your e-mail address at the
following URL and select the newsletters you wish to receive:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734137

To UNSUBSCRIBE to any newsletters, log in at the following URL and
select the newsletters you wish to cancel:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734138

GET MORE NEWS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Go to http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734097 for
more coverage on the Internet
Economy. Media Grok does not review stories from any IDG
publication, but includes relevant links to TheStandard.com and
IDG.net.

ADVERTISING INFORMATION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For more information on advertising in The Industry Standard
Newsletters, contact:

West Coast
Connie Elliott (mailto:celliott@thestandard.com)

East Coast
Norma Wesolowski (mailto:normaw@thestandard.com)

FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Send letters to the editor to letters@thestandard.com.

Please contact us with any problems that arise.
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284790&d=734139

You can also contact us via phone or mail:
The Industry Standard, Customer Service
(402) 293-0386 (phone)
(402) 293-0794 (fax)

The Industry Standard, Production
315 Pacific Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 733-5400 (main)
(415) 733-5401 (fax)

Copyright 2000 The Industry Standard


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 12/15/99 05:20 PM
---------------------------

GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 10:30:11 AM

[ &nbsp]Message[ &nbsp]-[ &nbsp]From:[&
nbsp]GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 04:30 PM GMT

To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Jrtemplton@aol.com, william_p_boswell@corp.cng.com

Subject:	DOE meeting

Stan, Shelley and Jeff:

    Attached is a draft of the announcement, agenda and two form letters.
January 26 is the date and we hope to have this announcement this week,
barring any problems that arise at the last minute.  Let me know if you have
any changes you would like made.  Jim and Bill have reviewed the announcement
and the agenda.

     We are putting together the list of associations and special invitees,
in addition, of course, to all GISB members.  So far the list includes the
AGA, APGA, APPA, EPRI, EPSI, NERC, NARUC Gas and Electric Committees, CUBR,
EEI, IPPA, NGSA, UIG, Governors' Association, Energy Subcommittee, NASUCA.
If you can think of any more let me know.

    On corporations -- we are targeting big utilities that are not GISB
members -- Southern, the Electric side of Cinergy, NYSEG, etc.  If you can
think of any others there, also let me know.

        Best Regards, Rae

 - meeting.PDF


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042715.txt


That filing is 17 pages long, however, I'm not able to print the last page -
- I've tried everything!  I'm sending the first 16 pages to you via
interoffice, and I'll have to get with tech support on Monday to find out
about that last page.

Susan, I put a copy of it in you in box up here.


The Errata to the May 5, 2001 Staff Assessment for the Hanford Energy Park
Peaker is now online.  To view this document, please visit:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/peakers/hanford/documents/index.html

Thank you,

Jon Doidge
CEC Web Team


Pls see below - I did answer you specifically about WAPA. I am OK to open
them for trading in the West.

I don't know what CRSP means - maybe Credit does...

	Tana Jones
	02/22/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 2-21-01

With respect to Western Area Power Administration - CRSP.  Can't "ditto"
Credit on that one, Credit gives no direction as to what they want to trade.
The database reflects that Leslie approved them to trade power already in
July of last year, so my intention is to keep them open.  I don't know what
"CRSP" means at the end of their name, do you?

	Shari Stack
	02/22/2001 04:16 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 2-21-01

With regard to:

UAMPS: Approved for West Physical Power, Buys and Sales
Western Area Power Administration: Approved for West Physical Power, Buys and
Sales

With regard to:
Utah Municipal Power Agency: NOT APPROVED  (not a current CP/Not FERC
authorized)

With regard to everyone else on the list:

Ditto Credit

Thanks,

Shari

	Tana Jones
	02/21/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 2-21-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 05:14 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	02/21/2001 05:09 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities,
Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 2-21-01

Please see attached.


Paul:

I have proposed we change our procedure here and we are discussing the
proposed changes.  I will send you a copy of my proposal.  We can talk about
in a few weeks in London.

Regards,

Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

Lloyd Will
09/11/2000 03:20 PM
To: Keith Fraley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole
La/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Marc Bir/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Chen/Corp/Enron@Enron, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Ramesh Swaminathan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Price Spikes

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 03:17 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           09/11/2000 01:46 PM

To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Price Spikes

FYI.  A good paper.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

Christi L Nicolay
09/11/2000 01:46 PM
To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, John Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Price Spikes

Steve--Thanks.  This paper sheds alot of light on why Cal. is problematic.
Jeff, Jim S., and I talked about it today because of Kevin's desire to be
able to float his entire position against the pool and the reg. group idea
that some "penalty" or separate charge should be attributed to those that
cause the big congestion (primarily because of the Cal. problem that day of
is cheaper than day ahead due to the caps.)

Steve Walton
09/07/2000 09:13 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Price Spikes

Christi,
 I found this to be a very interesting paper on the California Price Spikes.
The conclusion is that price caps are infact creating part of the problem.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Walton/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 08:52
PM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 09/06/2000 12:29:49 AM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: wgibson@nwppc.org, steve.walton@enron.com, philip.h.carver@state.or.us,
blsilverstein@bpa.gov, adavis@state.mt.us, lnordell@state.mt.us,
lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, dave.robertson@gt.pge.com, kewh@dynegy.com,
arneo@ep.cted.wa.gov
cc:
Subject: Price Spikes

The attached paper (which was presented to the OPUC by its author last
month) provides a nice summary of some of the reasons behind the turmoil
in California.

Carl

 - VanVactor-PriceSpikes081400.PDF


Per discussion with David, Theresa and myself this morning, we have agreed
that the current most effective approach is for Trena/Jeff K. to do the
executions for London Credit.com and for Equity/Debt Trading to do the
settlements.

The trades will be executed in the name of London Credit.com.  We need to set
up a Morgan Stanley account in the name of London Credit.com to facilitate
settlements.

We contacted Ketan Parekh, Morgan Stanley, VP, Prime Brokerage, to discuss
the impact of housing the account in NY vs. Morgan Stanley London.  Ketan
said that they have many clients that are settling activity from Europe in
their NY prime brokerage accounts with no problems.  Since the NY and London
would be different settlement streams and in light of the current anticipated
activity, we are requesting we open an account in Morgan Stanley NY.

Sara, David suggested that Paul Simons would be the contact for account
opening information.

Please do not hesitate to call if questions.
Thanks. Sheila
3-3210


All,
So that everyone can see what everone else is doing, below is the list of
steps of which I am aware.
I think quite a few of these were completed in Houston on Friday.
Please shout if:
- I have missed anything
- Any deadlines are unrealistic
- Anybody else should be copied in
etc

Thanks,
Richard


JWM <JMcTarnaghan@GMSSR.COM>
	01/18/2001 11:59 AM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft letter on diversion situation

Dear Jeff and Mike:

Per your request, I have put together a draft letter to the CPUC seeking
relief from PG&E's diversions.  I drafted it so that it could be signed by a
group of suppliers and non-core customers.

This letter could also be converted relatively easy to a pleading if that
approach is determined to be preferable.

Let me know if you want to  pursue this further.

Jim McT

765-8409

 <<X20054.DOC>>

 - X20054.DOC


This is the spreadsheet for counterparty name changes and mergers/business
changes for April 2000.  If you have any questions please call me at 3-6517.

NOTE:
For the name changes the legal name and ERMS SN will be will be updated on
4/25/00 (Tuesday).

Thanks!  Marilyn


You won - it was a convincing argument

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Coleman, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Office Space

Louise,

Tammy told me of your decision to put us in the tower, and I want to thank you for hearing our concerns.  I appreciate that you kept an open mind, and I sincerely think this arrangement is best for the company.

Thanks!

Mike


Notice No. 00-392
November 17, 2000

TO: ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS

FROM: Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

DATE:  November 17, 2000

RE:  Notice of CFTC Approval of Amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47 ("Audit
Committee")
____________________________________________________________________

Please be advised that the CFTC has approved amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47
("Audit Committee"), which are shown below and are now in effect.  The
amendments add an additional Public Director and expand the duties of the
Audit Committee to encompass consideration of the information to be included
in NYMEX filings to the SEC.

If you have any questions, please contact Michael Lugo, Vice President of
Internal Auditing, at  (212) 299-2268.

APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 6.40A

(An asterisk indicates deletions; parentheses indicate deletions.)

Rule 3.47 AUDIT COMMITTEE

(A) The Audit Committee shall be a regular committee and shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board and *two*(three) Public Directors appointed by the
Board.  One of the Public Directors shall serve as Chairman of the Committee
(B) The Audit Committee shall:
(i) *on* (On) an annual basis:
(a) make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding selection,
retention and discharge of independent auditors for the ensuing year; and
(b) *(b)* review the scope and general extent of the independent auditors,
examination, the significant audit procedures which will be utilized, and
fees charged for their services.
((ii) Review the audited financial statements and discuss them with
management and the independent auditors. These discussions shall include, but
not be limited to, the matters required to be disclosed under Statement of
Auditing Standards No. 61 (established by the Auditing Standards Board) and
consideration of the quality of the Exchange,s accounting principles as
applied in its financial reporting, including a review of sensitive
accounting estimates, reserves and accruals, judgement areas, audit
adjustments (whether or not recorded), and other such inquires as the
Committee or the independent auditors shall deem appropriate.  Based on such
review, the Committee shall make its recommendation to the Board as to the
inclusion of the Exchange,s audited financial statements in the Exchange,s
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(iii) Discuss with representatives of management and the independent auditors:
(a) the interim financial information contained in the Exchange,s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q prior to its filing; and
(b) the results of the review by the independent auditors.)
(iv) *(ii) on* (On) a monthly basis, or at such times as the Committee shall
determine, but not less than twice each year, meet with the independent
auditors, President, Senior Vice President of Finance, *Director* (Vice
President) of Internal Audit and other personnel as the Committee deems
appropriate to review:
(a) the scope of the audit plan;
(b) the Exchange,s financial statements;
(c) the results of external and internal audits;
(d) the effectiveness of the Exchange,s system of internal controls;
(e) any limitations imposed by Exchange personnel on the independent
auditors; and
(f) such other matters as the Committee shall deem appropriate upon advising
the Executive Committee.
((v)) * review *(Review) the internal audit function of the Exchange,
including proposed audit programs for the coming year, the coordination of
such a programs with the independent auditors, the extent to which
recommendations made by the internal auditors or by the independent auditors
have been implemented, and management,s response to the recommendations of
the independent *auditors;* (auditors.)
(vi) *(iv)review,* (Review,)  at its discretion, compliance with codes of
conduct established the * Exchange;*(Exchange.)
((vii)) * consult* (Consult) with the independent auditors, and when
appropriate the * Director*  (Vice President) of Internal Audit, out of the
presence of management.
 * establish * ((viii)Establish) direct communication between the auditors
and the * Board; * (Board)
((ix))* initiate* (Initiate,) at its discretion, investigations within the
parameters of foregoing responsibilities, and for that purpose with the
approval of the Board, retain outside legal counsel, independent auditors, or
any other such experts as if may deem   *appropriate; and* (appropriate.)
((x))  * report* (Report) to the entire Board at such time as the (Committee
determines,) but not less than twice a year on the activities described in
this Rule.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-392)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


The PECO supplier administration line is 215-841-3700.  I just got what I presume is the after-hours recording.


The games continue in California.

The date of suspension now being considered in 83xx is July 12.  We are still working (1) to define this in a way that is favorable to getting our recent DASR group authorized for DA service or (2) supporting some other solution.

Will keep everyone informed as information comes in.

By the way, I've asked Evan Hughes for a detailed listing of how moving the date impacts our success ratio.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 03:43 PM ---------------------------
From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/18/2001 11:47 AM
To:	Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Bert Frazier/ENRON@enronXgate, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: California Update--0717.01

Both 82XX and 83XX are to be discussed in committee today.  Significantly, an amendment that is expected to be included in 82XX would establish July 12 as the start date for when the PUC may not authorize any new or replacement direct transactions.

By contrast, 83XX directs the commission to authorize direct transactions on an open enrollment basis not less than 2 times each year, conicident with the expiration of DWR purchases.

Nothing more yet from the CPUC on its intended action.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:31 PM
To:	skean@enron.com; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Denne, Karen; mpalmer@enron.com; Guerrero, Janel; Kaufman, Paul; Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	California Update--0717.01

What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however, since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


EnronOptions Announcement

You can now access a web site that describes EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option
Program.  The web site contains some highlights of the EnronOptions Program
as well as some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).

Access EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program web site by clicking on
http://hrweb.enron.com or by typing the address into your web browser.

We hope you find the site helpful in addressing your questions about the
EnronOptions Program.  If you have any questions, please contact your H.R.
Representative.

There will be several EnronOptions - Your Stock Option Program presentations
throughout the month of January.  Stay tuned to a computer near you for
details.


Kerry E. Carter
Analyst
Simmons & Company International
(713) 236-9999
----- Forwarded by Kerry Carter/SCI on 11/26/01 03:02 PM -----

                    Dan Pickering
                                         To:     Everyone
                    11/26/01             cc:
                    08:30 AM             Subject:     Thoughts on the world of energy (OSX
                                         $77, XNG $183, XOI 496)

This went to our institutional clients this morning....DRP

Dan Pickering
Simmons & Company International
700 Louisiana, Suite 5000
Houston, TX 77002
phone:  (713) 223-7861
fax:  (713) 223-7845
email:  dpickering@simmonsco-intl.com
----- Forwarded by Dan Pickering/SCI on 11/26/01 08:33 AM -----

                    Dan Pickering
                                         To:     Sales Trading
                    11/26/01             cc:
                    08:30 AM             Subject:     Thoughts on the world of energy (OSX
                                         $77, XNG $183, XOI 496)

SUMMARY:  At or near inflection points, stock calls are all about the big
picture.  This is particularly true of cyclicals like energy.  Although
execution is always important for differentiating between companies,
company specifics mean relatively little to investors right now compared to
the big picture.  We believe the broad market and energy stocks
(particularly oil and gas stocks) currently discount an economic recovery
in 2H'02 and that commodity prices will not crater and will begin to
improve with economic conditions.  Valuation for energy stocks is neither
particularly cheap nor expensive at this point in the cycle.  Hard to hate
them; hard to love them.  15% moves in either direction would create more
interest from us to buy or to sell.  Would call news over the weekend
(particularly Russian) as negative, especially in light of the light volume
rally on Friday, which has put the stocks ahead of where they should be on
a trading basis.

THE BIG PICTURE:  Crude oil fundamentals and pricing are appropriately the
current focus of investors and this has been driving energy stocks on a
trading basis.  We aren't going to be disappointed by the amount of news
flow, as many issues will be relatively quick to play out within the next
several months.

   Russia:  Recent news is negative.  Promised reduction in output from
   30k/day to 50k/day is a disappointment and makes future OPEC cuts and
   compliance more risky.  Volume reductions will be revisited on December
   10th, but near-term damage has been done.  Conclusion:  downward
   pressure.
   Iraq:  Nothing is obvious about Iraq.  Sanctions renewal is coming up in
   just a few weeks.  News is surprisingly quiet on this front - with
   pricing mechanism complaints the only recent commentary from Iraqi
   government.  Intriguing that Russia scuttled the US/Britain calls for
   smart sanctions last renewal period, but now have much more to gain by
   encouraging events that prompt Iraq to leave the export market, boost
   crude prices and help Russia win on both volume and price.  However,
   Russian companies are the big winners in rejuvenating Iraqi oilfields,
   so do they want to alienate Iraq here?  A blurb over the weekend that
   Iraq caught some Iranian plotters against Saddam Hussein, which adds to
   overall confusion on the Iraqi situation.  Conclusion: Upside pressure.
   War In Afghanistan:  Current successes are good for the economy and
   crude demand, but also reduces the near-term risk of supply disruptions.
   War premium coming out of crude.  Conclusion:  Downward pressure.
   Economy/Energy Fundamentals:  Recent US economic datapoints appear to be
   modestly better than experts have predicted.  Europe as bad as expected.
   Japan remains dismal.  Lower crude and gasoline prices are nice stimulus
   for disposable income (just in time for Xmas shopping).  However, even
   if shoppers are mobbing Wal Mart, worldwide energy demand still appears
   to be falling on the margin.  Crude inventories rising at a brisk pace
   vs. historical norms for this time of year and more OPEC (and non-OPEC)
   cuts and compliance are needed to maintain a price in the high-teens/low
   $20/barrel level.  Conclusion:  Near-term downside pressure but glimmers
   of hope via economy.
   US/Europe Political Issues:  You have to assume that US and European
   governments care more about reasonably priced (or cheap) crude oil to
   stimulate the economy than anything else - but also don't want economic
   chaos in the Middle East.  We continue to gather intelligence from our
   Washington contacts that the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve will be used
   to support prices, but not until WTI crude is in the mid-teens.
   Conclusion:  Modest downward pressure.
   Israel/Palestine:  More violence over the long weekend.  Still no signs
   that OPEC countries taking a significant stance on this issue.  Watch
   the rhetoric - that will come before any action on OPEC's part.
   Conclusion:  Neutral with more likely upside pressure than downside
   pressure.
   Enron Situation:  If ENE craters, the impact on energy markets is
   unquantified, but certainly significant.  Who knows about what ripple
   effects could (and are) occurring.  Conclusion:  ????
   Natural Gas:  Warm weather and weak industrial demand are a bad combo.
   Thank your lucky stars that it was the Wednesday before Thanksgiving
   when last week's ugly AGA gas inventory numbers were reported.  Falling
   gas rigcount is the only near term savior and that is occurring.  Gas
   problems will work themselves out faster than crude and hence our bias
   toward gassy stocks - note that the street has also figured this out as
   the gassy names have had the best performance off the bottom.
   Conclusion:  Stinky and everyone knows it.  Trading influence only.
   Investors are really watching crude oil for the next big move (in either
   direction) for the stocks.

STOCKS:   Overall, incorporating fundamentals, sentiment and valuation, the
sector is closer to a buy than a sell.   In June 2001, we worried about 3
shoes that could drop as a result of the soft economy.  Nat gas prices (and
sentiment).  Crude oil prices (and sentiment).  Earnings expectations.  All
three have happened and it will take a lot of bad news on the items
discussed above to take energy stocks to new lows (OSX <$59, XNG <$167).
That doesn't imply a huge run to new highs either.  The problems in OPEC
have shaken investor confidence and therefore we think that energy will lag
in a rally of the cyclicals.  It has become boring to write the concluding
paragraphs of these notes as the conclusion has not changed much.  Big
investors should go against the grain and buy the hard down moves.  Small
investors should be more valuation sensitive on entry points.

*****************************************************************************************************

This e-mail is based on information obtained from sources which Simmons &
Company International believes to be reliable, but Simmons & Company
International does not represent or warrant its accuracy.  The opinions and
estimates contained in this e-mail represent the views of Simmons & Company
as of the date of the e-mail, and may be subject to change without prior
notice.  Simmons & Company International, its partners and/or employees may
have positions in the securities discussed.  Simmons & Company
International may make a market in the securities discussed and may have
served as a financial advisor and/or underwriter to companies discussed.
Simmons & Company International will not be responsible for the consequence
of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained in this e-mail.  This
e-mail is confidential, and may not be reproduced,  in whole or in part,
without the prior written permission of Simmons & Company International.


FYI, Jim asked that I drop you a note with regard to a proposed LNG project
being developed by Global Markets.  I have provided some technical support
with respect to some onshore storage tariff issues.

The project consists of converting an oil tanker into a floating vaporization
facility, anchoring it off the coast of California and constructing a subsea
pipeline to bring the gas onshore.  The facility would have a daily unloading
rate of 500,000 mmbtu/d, taking approximately 6-7 days to fully unload a
cargo.  Approximately 172,000 mmbtu/d would go directly to market, with the
remainder being injected into utility storage facilities for ultimate
withdrawal prior to arrival of a new shipment of LNG (roughly 11 days).  The
goal is to baseload a market of 172,000 mmbtu/d.

The project would have a start-up date in early 2003.  While other proposals
are being considered to bring LNG into California, the Enron proposal is
unique in that it is considering onshore gas storage vs offshore LNG
storage.  Retrofitting the oil tanker takes approximately 18 months.
Constructing an offshore LNG storage facility would take 3 years -  providing
Enron a competitive advantage with respect to timing.   To protect this
competitive advantage during the development stage of the project, it has
been requested that this particular aspect  be kept confidential.

Lisa Yoho is working directly with Kurt Lindahl, the project manager.


Sorry, one more time.  The attached file should be correct.

(See attached file: HPLN1216.xls)

 - HPLN1216.xls


Enclosed are Canada's IM positions in txt format.  Please let me know if they
work in your systems as I will be sending nightly.
Kathy


Clint/Jeff:

ENA has an ISDA master agreement with an affiliate of CSFB (but not CSFB).
Can you provide me with the name of a CSFB lawyer so that I can send over a
form of ISDA Master Agreement with Enron Corp.?  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Virendra,

Let me know when you are available to discuss the Gas Daily GRMS logic.  It
is my understanding that GRMS currently will only include those gas daily
deals that are intramonth deals with an effective date greater than the
current date.  However, we should also include any deals in out months that
are fixed price gas daily deals.

Thanks,
Robin
x57478


[IMAGE]

 The following message was sent to you as a subscriber to DandyOffers. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please click here: Unsubscribe

[IMAGE]


Not a problem.  There's 3 feet of power at Squaw.

The interest on the charges was $500.

	"Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
	04/10/2001 06:01 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, cameron@perfect.com, psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Merry Xmas?

Really? Jesus, I thought for sure I got charged. Didn't seem like I had any
extra cash on hand. I have to make sure they didn't charge me... Anyway,
I'll take care of that debt. What a joke! What happened when you put the
room on my card, Cameron? Why did I get so rejected at the ATM all weekend?

Damn irresponsible ski bums...

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: cameron@perfect.com, scottwl@hotmail.com, psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
>Subject: Merry Xmas?
>Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:21:36 -0500
>
>Scott/Cameron:
>
>OK, wondering why there ain't no charges on your credit card from our
>FABULOUS trip to Squaw Valley?  I just found out that they're all on
>mine!!?!?!?   I had the best time up there, but I couldn't figure out how
>it coulda cost $1700.  Just called them to inquire.  They said:  There's no
>mistake those are all the carges for rooms 432 and 450.  They're sending
>receipts.  Unreal.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Aimee,

We don't enter 3rd party storage deals in Sitara.  You may want to talk to
Kenny Soignet, but I thought that storage contracts were entered manually in
POPS.

D


Will be completed by 1:30 (takes a while to copy these). Reminder -- you will have to copy the data into that folder structure that you want to take with you

thanks

spc

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:13 PM
To:	Cox, Paige
Subject:	RE: New Folder to be set up

Thanks,

Will this folder be set up today?

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cox, Paige
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:10 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE: New Folder to be set up

John,

On the O drive you will not be allowed to create folders, as this is a common drive -- so all folders are created by IT (it was this way at Enron). The exception to this rule is if you are the owner of the "main" folder ... which in this case you are.

So ... to make a long story short, YOU will be able to create folders under this path that we have requested, but your team members won't. They will have to request access to do so.

Again, it's the same process as we used at Enron

thank

spc

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:56 AM
To:	Cox, Paige
Subject:	RE: New Folder to be set up

Thanks.

I have a question Paige, will I be able to create folders under this folder?  If not then I need to send another request in.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cox, Paige
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:55 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE: New Folder to be set up

John --

I have escalated

Paige

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:39 AM
To:	UBSW Energy Storage Security
Cc:	Cox, Paige; Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	New Folder to be set up

I need to have a new folder set up under the new O drive, it is as follows:

O:\Financial_Trading

I should be listed as owner.  Also, please give the following people read and write access to these folders:

Mike Maggi
John Lavarato
Dutch Quigley
Larry May
Jeb Ligums
Andy Zipper

Thanks for you help.  I need these set up as soon as possible.  Please call with any questions or concerns.

John Griffith

(713) 853-6247


Put this meeting on my schedule.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 03:27 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/19/2001 12:42 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES
		 cc: Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Details on All Employee Meeting

FYI, more background.

JWVS
----- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/19/2001 12:42
PM -----

	Keith Dodson & Ken Bean
	Sent by: Marilyn Oliver
	03/19/2001 11:49 AM

		 To: EECC Announcements -- Houston Notes Users, Dag Adolfsson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jonathan Ago/HOU/EES@EES, Nikki Bass-Cavanaugh/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Bickings/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas Callaghan/HOU/EES@EES, John Cates/HOU/EES@EES,
Scot Chambers/HOU/EES@EES, Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ashley
Faz/HOU/EES@EES, Howard Harvey/HOU/EES@EES, Dianna M James/HOU/EES@EES, Dirk
Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, John Krupski/HOU/EES@EES, David Kwok/HOU/EES@EES,
Stephan Laroche/HOU/EES@EES, Charon Little/HOU/EES@EES, John
Manning/HOU/EES@EES, Karl Masani/HOU/EES@EES, Kelly Merritt/HOU/EES@EES,
Sheila Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike Oehrle/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Penkwitz/HOU/EES@EES, Chaundra
Perry/HOU/EES@EES, Cecilia Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, Rocsie Sanchez/HOU/EES@EES,
William Simpson/HOU/EES@EES, Rachael Venable/HOU/EES@EES, Cheryl
White/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Whyte/EU/Enron@Enron, scott.watson@enron.com,
Yaser Tobeh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Stefanik/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Kenneth L Bean/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Details on All Employee Meeting

On Thursday afternoon, March 22, at 2:30PM in the Doubletree La Salle
Ballroom, we will have an All Employee Meeting to discuss Enron Engineering
and Operations Services (EEOS).  Mark Frevert and Dan Leff will join Brian
Stanley, John Gillis, and the two of us for this discussion.  Led by Mark and
Dan, we have been on a corporate journey to determine the best method to
provide a resource base for the building , operating, and maintaining of our
existing and planned major assets. The discussions evolved around two major
issues. First,  most of the engineering and project management resources were
concentrated in the former EE &CC, but operational resources were spread
among several groups.  OEC provided operational support to some, but not all
Enron assets.  Second, the clear need for both the engineering and
operational resources was in Wholesale not Retail (EES).  There will be some
need to help EES bridge into Industrial clients, but this need is minor
compared to the requirements of Wholesale.  As a benefit of the time Mark and
Dan plus other Executive Committee Members put into the decision  to form
EEOS, we believe we are correctly positioned to effectively address Enron's
major project needs.  Our Thursday meeting is an open forum to discuss these
and other issues you might have with our new or perhaps more clearly defined
position.

We look forward to seeing you on Thursday.

Keith Dodson
Chief Operating Officer - EEOS

Ken Bean
Vice President - Operational Energy Corp.


With this, we're at 498!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001 12:42 PM -----

	Samantha Boyd@ENRON
	01/18/2001 12:10 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason R
Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Midcoast Marketing, Inc.

We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   October 27, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Midcoast Marketing, Inc.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange
          Pulp & Paper

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   New York

Copies will be distributed.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Dear Mr. Kaminski,
?
Even though I cannot pass "official" interviews, I  would like to discuss
with ENRON. I was really impressed by your presentation  and I think I would
be a good fit for your firm.
?
I know that you?will be soon recruiting on  campus, maybe we could set up an
"informal meeting". Either give me a call at  home (412-802-6429) or send me
an email at this address. I would appreciate  though not to appear on
interview lists.
?
Pierre-Philippe  Ste-Marie
---------------------------------------------------
http://pstemarie.homestead.com


Reminder:
Please send me your questions regarding the 2000 Budget to be addressed in
tomorrow's meeting with Lisa Cousino.

Thanx!
Yvette
x3.5953
---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
01/24/2000 01:39 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           01/19/2000 05:09 PM

To: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Review Texas Budget Meeting

Please plan to attend a meeting Tuesday the 25th from 4 - 5 pm reviewing the
Texas Budgets.  You will receive hard copies of the budgets tomorrow. Please
review them and hold ALL questions and concerns until the meeting.  If at all
possible please forward your questions to me so that I may compile a list to
be delivered to Lisa Cousino Tuesday morning.

Thank you!
Yvette
x3.5953


-----Original Message-----
From: Your FitRx.com Team [mailto:customercare@fitrx.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:21 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: Your FitRx.com Receipt for Order # 58900

Thank you for your order!

Please review the following information, if anything is incorrect please contact customercare@fitrx.com.

Prod # Brand      Description                         Size       Qty  Price      Ext. Price

8658   EAS        Myoplex Lite - Vanilla Cream        20 pack    1    $26.95         $26.95
8656   EAS        Myoplex Lite - Chocolate Cream      20 pack    1    $26.95         $26.95
9450   WORLDWIDE  Pure Protein Bar - Blueberry Cheese 12 bars    1    $22.95         $22.95
                                                                       Subtotal:     $76.85
                                                           Sales Tax (IL 2.00%):      $0.00
                                                           Sales Tax (IL 8.25%):      $0.00
                                                                       Shipping:      $4.95
                                                                          Total:     $81.80

Ship To:
JOE PARKS
5438 SCHUMACHER
HOUSTON, TX 77056

Please allow 3 - 10 BUSINESS days for your order to arrive, including transit time. If your address is not verified or your credit card is not authorized, your order may be delayed or cancelled.

FitRx.com cannot be held responsible for errors in product information or inventory availability.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 09:16 AM -----

	Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	03/29/2001 09:13 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 03-28-01

Tana:

Under the entry for  Broadwing Telecommunications, the notation is that it
should roll up under the parent "Broadwind" Communications Services.  It
should be "Broadwing" Communications Services, Inc.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/29/01 09:06 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-28-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 09:06 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/28/2001 04:42 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-28-01

Please see attached.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 04:22 PM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	01/31/2001 02:38 PM

		 To: <jdasovic@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: PG&E Press Release Following Release of CPUC Audit

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Wed, 31 Jan
2001 08:44:20 -0600 -----
cc:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman"
<cshoneman@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Paul
Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	PG&E Press Release Following Release of CPUC Audit
Note:  When I checked, the audit report was not yet available on the CPUC web
site.

Wednesday January 31, 12:31 am Eastern Time

Press Release

PG&E Issues Statement Following Release of CPUC Report

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 30, 2001--Pacific Gas and Electric
Company today issued the following statement, in response to the report
released by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC):

``It is premature to comment in detail about the CPUC report issued late
today. We plan to study and evaluate this report thoroughly. As the CPUC is
well aware:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company procured power for its customers in
accordance with all CPUC requirements, despite having to make purchases at
rates substantially higher than those that it could charge to customers. As
the CPUC report confirms, these purchases have resulted in uncollected
amounts of $6.7 billion as of December 31, 2000.

The transfer of approximately $4 billion from Pacific Gas and Electric
Company to PG&E Corporation was consistent with CPUC directives. PG&E
shareholders invested their money to build the utility's power plants, and,
under California law, when those plants were sold under deregulation,
shareholders were entitled to recover their investments.

CPUC rules require sharp lines between the corporation's utility and
non-utility businesses and establish a rigorous framework to ensure that
those lines are observed. Ratepayers are not to subsidize the growth of
PG&E's national business -- and they have not.

The report suggests that the use of affiliate earnings and greater cash
conservation efforts could have made a difference. That is simply not the
case. Even if the $117 million of NEG earnings that the report attributes to
California were used to purchase power and the utility implemented Draconian
cash conservation measures -- including laying off every management employee,
reducing the rank-and-file workforce by an additional one-thousand employees,
breaking contracts and implementing a salary freeze on Union employees -- the
total savings would amount to less than one month's worth of power at current
prices.

``The important objective of all parties -- the utilities, lawmakers and
regulators including the CPUC -- should be to move expeditiously to achieve a
constructive solution to the energy crisis, which is threatening the safety
of Californians and the economic well-being of the state.''

For more information about Pacific Gas and Electric Company, please visit our
web site at http://www.pge.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Contact:

     Pacific Gas and Electric
     News Department, 415/973-5930


Please provide me with the delivering PL and contract numbers/volumes  for
each
of the attached.

I need PGL&C info ASAP.

Thanks.

 - mid continent needs.xls


Colleagues:

Utility Risk Management positions as of August are now available at the following level of details:

	The net position in electric utility "x."
	The net position per customer in the electric utility "x."
	The net position per rate schedule/customer class in electric utility "x."
	Aggregates of the above per State, NERC region, and Customer.

If you need any position for a specific utility in your service territory, please contact Bryan Gottfredson (713-345-2430) or Miyung Buster (713-853-4329) by email with cc to: Stella Chan, Pat Keene and/or Amr Ibrahim and we shall attempt to provide the data in the shortest possible time (currently aiming at within the same business day).

Best Regards,

Bryan Gottfredson


calendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/28/2001 11:23 AM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	01/24/2001 03:54 PM

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry West/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon E
Sullo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia
Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, mary_trosper@pgn.com, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol
Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy
McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Binky
Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Taria
Reed/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: ENE Committee and Board Meeting Schedule - 2001


I assume this has been calendared?

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Coats, Carol
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Coats, Carol; Knudsen, Sheila A.; Cash, Michelle; Wysatta, Margaret; Davies, Neil
Subject:	Organizational & Performance Issues
When:	Friday, August 10, 2001 3:00 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB 3604, behind Lobby Receptionist Desk


I don't think I'm going to go either.  Let me know about poker though.
Shannan

W. Shannan O'Shaughnessy
Subsea Facilities Engineer
ILX Projects, GOM DWP
*:281-366-4567
*:oshaugws@bp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Wolfe@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Wolfe@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:42 PM
To: O'Shaughnessy, W. Shannan
Subject: Re: FW: UH ChemE Alumni Reception tomorrow

Don't worry. It sounds like Chastant is going, at least.
I would consider going, except I don't work in engineering, and I don't
like Chastant.

You can convince me if you are definitely going and I can show up around 7.

Jason


launch jeff, and I'll let you decide who else really needs to be there.

Sarah Mulholland
01/19/2001 03:56 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

nope.  that was my last minute all i had was gerardo and i and had begged
everyone at the last minute attempt.  i'll call him now,

sarah

To: Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

do we need jeff snyder?

Sarah Mulholland
01/19/2001 03:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Ok, Sarah Wesner is not attending and Beth has to come so I've got little
choice.  I can cut off one more but everyone said no at first and then just
came back and said yes.  Initially I was going to have to speak so it was
going to be 4 people and then you can go to speak so that makes 5.  Beth
included is 6.

Sarah

To: Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Do we really need 7 people to attend this event?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shawna Johnson @ ENRON                           01/19/2001 03:38 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerardo
Benitez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Miguel Nasser/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Wesner/Corp/Enron, Jeffrey Snyder/Corp/Enron, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Hi!

I apologize for the changes.  Jeff Shankman will now be joining us and he is
added to the event sheet.  You each now have your own confirmation number.
Again, review the event sheet and confirm your hotel dates and contact me
with any changes.  If you should have any questions regarding the itinerary
please do not hesitate to call.

Have fun!

Shawna Johnson
Recruiting Coordinator
58369


Here is the Desk Analysis - breakdown of 2000 10 DPR by desk.

Thanks again,
Amy
ext 39741


Serge,

I just wanted to see if you had an opportunity to review the revised Enron
Corp. Guaranty.  I believe that it is the only document that has not been
finalized.  Please call me at 713-220-4124 if there are any outstanding
issues.

Thanks,

Jason


Steve -- great guidance.
Cynthia -- hope we're in time.
Jeff -- the fifth paragraph has some supply/demand figures for the early part
of this week that I heard but can't track down the written source. Any
suggestions?

Please review and don't hesitate to call me this weekend. Best bet is home
number -- 914-736-9504 or cell phone -- 914-318-1568.

Jeannie


Great.  Thanks again for going out of your way to meet Alina and join in the party welcoming her.  You're the best!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 9:10 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	found my eyemakeup

I hope you didn't spend a lot of time looking in the apartment for my eye makeup.  I found what I lost this a.m.  Thanks again.  Maria


Dear Advisory Board Member,

Thank you for your continued support of NACECs Initiative "Environmental
Challenges and Opportunities of the Evolving Continental Electricity Market".

Please find attached the following documents for your review and to be
further discussed during the conference call Thursday May 24 at 3:00 EST.

1) an Interim Note for the Secretariat report
2) a draft recommendations checklist (for initial discussion)
3)  a list of the advisory board members and bios (please note that we have
shortened some of the bios, if you have yet to submit a bio please send a
copy to yolanda@ccemtl.org )

Items to be discussed during conference call:
I) Secretariat update - progress, expert report, symposium
II) Process and approach for developing guidelines/recommendations
III) Initial discussion of guidelines/recommendations
IV) 2nd Advisory Board meeting date and venue

Details of the conference call:

Participants from Canada and the United States should dial:
1-877-633-5353 (toll free)

Participants from Mexico should dial:
0-1-800-123-0200 and ask the operator to charge this telephone call to the
telephone number: (1-514) 868-2558

then enter the following Code: 023405#

If there is any problem with the communication during the call  please dial *0
(Conference call reference: C799250)

On behalf of my colleagues at NACEC,
Sincerely,

Yolanda Clegg

Yolanda Clegg, M.Sc.
Environment, Economy and Trade Program
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
393 rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200
Montreal
Quebec
CANADA         H2Y 1N9

tel: 514-350-4368
fax: 514-350-4314
yolanda@ccemtl.org

http://www.cec.org

 - Interim Note.doc
 - Recommendations checklist.doc
 - Members and Bios.doc


>
> 	Brian Hester invited his mother over for dinner.  During the course
> of the meal, Brian's mother couldn't help but keep noticing how beautiful
> Brian's roommate, Stephanie, was. Mrs. Hester had long been suspicious of
> a relationship between Brian and his roommate, Stephanie, and this had
> only made her more curious. Over the course of the evening, while watching
> the two react, Mrs. Hester started to wonder if there was more between
> Brian and his roommate, Stephanie, than met the eye.
>
> 	Reading his mom's thoughts, Brian volunteered, "I know what you must
> be thinking, but I assure you Stephanie and I are just roommates."
>
> 	About a week later, Stephanie came to Brian saying, "Ever since your
> 	mother came to dinner, I've been unable to find the beautiful silver
> gravy
> 	ladle.  You don't suppose she took it, do you?" Brian said, "Well, I
> doubt it,
> 	but I'll send her an e-mail just to be sure."
>
> 	So he sat down and wrote "Dear Mother, I'm not saying that you 'did'
> take
> 	the gravy ladle from the house, I'm not saying that you 'did not'
> take
> 	the gravy ladle.  But the fact remains that one has been missing
> ever since you were here for dinner". Love, Brian
>
> 	Several days later, Brian received a letter from his mother that
> read:
>
> 	"Dear son, I'm not saying that you 'do' sleep with Stephanie, and
> I'm not
> 	saying that you 'do not' sleep with Stephanie. But the fact remains
> that if she was sleeping in her own bed, she would have found the gravy
> ladle by
> 	now."
>
> 	Love, Mom
>
> 	LESSON OF THE DAY.........NEVER LIE TO YOUR MOTHER
>
>


Mark and Paul,

I would be happy to call in with you on your first "on call" weekend if you would like.  Mark, your weekend comes up this next weekend, I will plan to call in on Sat and Sun with you.  Alma will send you an email with the total list of everyone calling in including the phone number to dial into.  Make sure you locate this list prior to the weekend.  Remember, call in about 5-7 minutes before 8:00am Sat and Sun.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Carrillo, Alma; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	On Call Schedule

I have updated the TW on call schedule to include Mark and Paul.  Please let me know if anyone has a conflict.  (I left the holiday weekends as they were.)

Lorraine


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


I bought 5,000 units of Northern Border Partners at $39.56 with part of the
proceeds.  The roughly $975K is correct.  Thanks.  Any ideas on the cash?  I
was thinking about $800k in munis and $800k in S&P 500 index fund.  Your
thoughts.

"Hill, David " <David.Hill@morganstanley.com> on 05/19/2001 10:40:17 AM
To: "Stan Horton (E-mail)" <stanley.horton@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Receipt of cash

We received the two deposits you expected this week. The amount of the
larger one was not the number you gave me. Take a look at client serve and
see if it is correct.

**** Important Notice to Recipients ****
It is important that you do not use e-mail to request, authorize or effect
the purchase or sale of any security or commodity, to send fund transfer
instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such request,
orders, or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be
processed by Morgan Stanley.
****************************************


Keri Lynch
719 W. Montrose
Chicago, IL 60613
keri.lynch@usa.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I believe it is your duty to to donate the millions of dollars you made from Enron stock before the bankruptcy to funds that assist former Enron employees who were so badly hit from this financial fiasco, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH. These funds also provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.

It is now known that you personally gained $100 million off of Enron stock, while many Enron employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy.  Enron also profited from the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, thousands of consumers are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the employees to buy it.  You must know, in your heart, that this is truly unfair, unjust and unethical.  But there is something you can do to help make things right: please donate this money to funds set up to help repair the lives of Americans hurt by Enron's misdeeds.  I think it's the least you can do.

Thanks for your time.

Sincerely,

Keri Lynch


Jeff:

Per my voice mail, please see the attached.
Are you the point person for EnronCredit.com Ltd and debt trading?  Sara

----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 06:28 PM -----

	Richard Sage
	11/22/2000 02:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronCredit Legal Entities

We may well find some BVs and suchlike being added, but here are the
alternatives we had on the table last week.

Thanks,
Richard


I think you can send it just so he has the form, and we can figure out what
we need to do with it.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 04:04 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: long form confirm/MDEA

do we need to mess with this or can i send it to Marvin??

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: long form confirm/MDEA

Starting point for exhibit 2

 << File: long form template.doc >>


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031224.txt


logoInfoBeat: Don't miss a beat!
	Daily Dose
	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	InfoBeat HomeUser Profile

	[IMAGE]
	DATE
	[IMAGE]
	Sunday, November 26, 2000
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Fun - Daily Dose - 11/24/2000

	 Cool Site of the Day
	Fact of the Day
	Quote of the Day
	Born Today

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Cool Site of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Since you've already got turkey on the brain from yesterday's heroic display
of gluttony, why not learn a little more about the country of the same name?
Turkey.org is a flashy site loaded with information, from daily Turkish news
to details of the country's rich history. Background sections on everything
from the country's political landscape to their business and economic models
to a look at the Turkish arts are concise and informative. Learn something
new at Turkey.org - and pass the Tums while you're at it. www.turkey.org

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Fact of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Did you ever wonder why one's retirement savings plan is called a 401(k)?
With the creation of the Tax Reform Act of 1978, section 401, paragraph (k)
of the Internal Revenue Code was developed. Under this section, Congress
authorized the creation of a tax-deferred savings plan for employees. For
more, click here.

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Quote of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Thought For Today: "Time is the fire in which we burn."  "Star Trek" creator
Gene Roddenberry (1921-1991).

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Born Today
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	- Columnist William F. Buckley is 75.
	- Country singer Johnny Carver is 60.
	- Onetime Beatles drummer Pete Best is 59.
	- Rock musician Donald Dunn (Booker T and the MG's) is 59.
	- Actor-comedian Billy Connolly is 58.
	- Singer Lee Michaels is 55.
	- Actor Dwight Schultz is 53.
	- Actor Stanley Livingston is 50.
	- Rock musician Clem Burke (Blondie) is 45.
	- Record producer Terry Lewis is 44.
	- Actress Denise Crosby is 42.
	- Rock musician John Squire (Stone Roses) is 38.
	- Rock musician Gary Stonadge (Big Audio) is 38.
	- Rock musician Chad Taylor (Live) is 30.
	- Actor Colin Hanks is 23.
	- Actress Katherine Heigl is 22.

	Source: Associated Press

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	You are subscribed with e-mail address: [judy.hernandez@enron.com]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Home | User Profile | Unsubscribe
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	entertainment | finance | fun | news | snow reports | sports | weather

	(C) 2000 indimi, inc. All rights reserved.
	InfoBeat is a registered tradmark of indimi, inc.
	InfoBeat services are for personal use only.
	Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or electronic,
	is prohibited.

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]


Good Morning!

Cheryl Nelson will be in around 10:30-11 today, due to health issues.  Should
you need to contact her immediately, please contact me at x5-3317.  Thank you
for your attention to this matter.

Regards,
Keegan Farrell

p.s. - Kayla, would you mind forwarding this message to any concerned parties
I may have left out.  Thank you!


dont forget your plastic cups we washed

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:29 PM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Parks, Joe;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; brianc@saltgrass.com
Cc: chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net
Subject: RE: KILL!

that is a really bad wind for many blinds. mertz called this am. has not
seen a big buck he say in the bull pasture since last week. COuple of young
deer, one good looking young 8. Lots of deer eating protien at booger. Has
not seen them, but feed disappearing quick. wants us to shoot some deer out
of that front pasture. Good rub (big) seen by tank at booger. says you can't
miss it. has seen some decent pre-rut activity this week.
There is another good buck in the robertson pasture. He saw it crossing the
oil field road last week. big body, 5 points on the side he saw, good mass.

Brian should be trying to organize a menu. He will procure keg of bud light
if mccombs get the "kegerator". McCombs, stay posted.
I have lots of paper plates and paper coffe cups. I believe we have plenty
of paper towels.

Looking forward to seeing everyone there.

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
>To: "chad knipe" <knipe3@msn.com>, "Chet Fenner" <chet_fenner@bmc.com>,
>"EriK Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>,   "Brian Constantine"
><brianc@saltgrass.com>,   "Brian & Terry Constantine"
><btconstantine@aol.com>
>Subject: RE: KILL!
>Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:38:16 -0600
>
>sorry chad, we are excited its just that work sucks balls. give enron
>got gaven all the way down to 11.25, for 36 two weeks ago,
>
>erik winds are predicted to be out of the east northeast now,
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:14 PM
>To: Chet Fenner; Parks, Joe; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Brian &
>Terry Constantine
>Subject: KILL!
>
>
>WHAT THE HELL!!     You fools are about to embark on the 2001
>pilgrimmage to the sacred killing fields where the noble venado will
>surrender (hmm..or be passed up) to your hot projectiles and thirst for
>gutpiles....AND NOT ONE SHRED OF THREADS OR RAMBLINGS TO HYPE AND
>CELEBRATE YOURSELVES INTO AN OVERPLANNED AND OVER ORCHESTRATED (which
>always leads to late departure anyway) LATHERED FRENZY!!!
>
>...have you no pride? ...glands?   RANT MY GOOD MEN, RANT!!    Scrape
>your heads on the doorframes at the office...spray your bedposts!!!
>Grunt!!
>
>Do NOT go gently.  right.
>
>C.
>
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp