An update on our change for the Storage Allocation.  Several questions
have come up over the weekend.  The weekend crew is documenting the
questions.  I have left Mike Bodnar and John Buchanan a phone mail message
to research the questions and concerns on Monday.  Then we will group with
storage and determine what changes need to be made.

One change we talked about on the Sunday morning call with storage is to
be able to use SBS on the non allocated portion of storage.  ie, if we are
allocating injections, then withdrawals should still use SBS.  If we are allocating
withdrawals, then injections should still have access to SBS.  Mike Bodnar will
pursue this enhancement further.  Thanks. Lynn

Lynn Blair
06/17/2001 04:56 PM
To:	Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron

Subject:	Re: FW: Storage allocations

FYI.  Just to keep ya'll in the loop.  This fix should be ready for test on Monday
and migrated Monday night for Tuesday's use.  This fix will be very beneficial
in minimizing Shipper imbalances on NNG.  Terry and Gerry will work with the teams
to be sure everyone is up to speed on the change.  If you have any questions while I
am out next week, please check with Terry Kowalke or Mike Bodnar.   Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/17/2001 04:50 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  John Buchanan                           06/15/2001 03:28 PM

To:	Gerry Medeles/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hasan Kedwaii/ENRON@enronXgate, Jill Setera/ENRON@enronXgate, Maggie Matheson/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: FW: Storage allocations

Per: Lynn Blair
Moving the storage allocation to before confirmations will be made only to the ID/2 cycle.

Thanks: John Buchanan

From:	Gerry Medeles/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/15/2001 03:17 PM
To:	Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hasan Kedwaii/ENRON@enronXgate, Jill Setera/ENRON@enronXgate, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maggie Matheson/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	FW: Storage allocations

FYI, with regards to item (3) below:
SBS will remain off after storage allocations are completed.  This will be a slight change for our customers.  Currently during the processes for example, the evening process, SBS is available during the Rollover, Allocation and Confirmation process, and turned off during the Storage Allocation process.  With this change SBS will only be available during the Rollover and Allocation process and remain off during the Storage Allocation and Confirmation process, if a storage allocation is necessary.  I am unsure how you would want to communicate this to your customers.

Also, Jill will be working on these changes over the weekend, and have Joe confirm her change by Monday the 18th.  Changes should be available for production by Tuesday the 19th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kedwaii, Hasan
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Setera, Jill
Cc:	Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	Storage allocations

Jill,
Lynn and Steve January want to change the storage allocation from after confirmation to after regular allocations during all cycles except timely (for the timely cycle it storage allocations will be after confirmations).

I looked at the code and it seemed to be pretty self contained module.  But a few things to look out for:

1) Process for saving to the database
	- after allocations
	- after storage allocations
	- after confirmations
2) rollback of allocations to include storage
3) SBS - currently it turned off for the storage allocation process.  How does it get turned back on?  Business group has to make a decision on how whether SBS needs to turned on or off for the confirmation process

Please let maggie or gerry know the time estimate.

Thanx

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Strong Drugs!!!

Becky Pitre
02/13/2001 11:00 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Waiting

Must be on drugs.

Robin Rodrigue
02/13/2001 10:48 AM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Waiting

We saw an even better one the other day.  Someone was trying to sell a 1972
Calladic Hurse.  It's white with orange flames on the front fenders!!!  And
it has a huge stereo system in the back.  Now what kind of freak owns
something like that and why would you announce it at work?

Becky Pitre
02/13/2001 10:42 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Waiting

While waiting for the computer guy to fix my software connections I went
browsing on the "For Sale" bulletin board.  Some lady is selling a Ball
Python.  The high points of the snake included the comment that it has "never
bitten" anyone and that it come with an exercise stick.   If you were a
snake, would you bite someone with an exercise stick?  Sounds like a time
bomb to me.The stupid snake also comes with a bed and a light!  Is that so it
can read in bed?  Who cares about a stupid snake.  The things people try to
sell.  FYI.  B


We will send you these three new hourly indexes at  no charge until March 19,
when we formally launch them on our Web site, at www.tradersnewsenergy.com.
?
Please contact me with any feedback or questions.  Thank you.
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????
Director of Indexes
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX:  713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewsenergy.com
?
?
 - comedhrly030101.doc
 - tvahrly030101.doc
 - ercothrly030101.doc


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 11:42
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
06/21/2000 04:07 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: July Production Estimate

Bob,

Please see the attached file estimating wellhead production for the month of
July.  Please be advised that this is a preliminary estimate as to this date,
we have received only two noms for July.  I will update you with any
revisions as they occur.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


Kay,

Tom will be out today & he called in and asked me to prepare a brief summary
of our interim agreement with MDEA for May.  He indicated that you would
prepare a formal version of these details for execution.

Should you have any questions, please contact myself, Kayne Coulter or Lloyd
Will.

Thanks & Regards,
Jeff Miller
X35642


It is amazing and yet not surprising how much Enron has accomplished in the
first six months of this year. You continue to make it happen.  We recognize
that you work hard every day to accomplish Enron,s business goals, and we are
pleased that many of you have shared in the company,s financial success
through Enron stock options.

As you may know, the current employee stock option program (also known as the
All Employee Stock Option Program or AESOP) began in 1994 and provided value
to participants through 2000.  Employees who have participated in this
program from its inception have realized a 1,119% increase in the value of
their stock options (assuming a stock price of $70) over the life of the
program.

Enron stock options are a valuable part of your total compensation package
and a contributing factor to your performance and to Enron,s continued
success.  Therefore, the Enron Executive Committee and the Compensation and
Management Development Committee of the Enron Board of Directors have decided
to continue to offer stock options as a part of your compensation package.

On May 1, 2000, the Committee approved an employee stock option program for
calendar years 2001 - 2005 (EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program).  It is
expected that EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program will be granted,
effective on or about December 29, 2000, for those employees who are eligible
on that date (please see note below).  The new program, which is subject to
final approval by Enron,s Board of Directors, is as follows:

? EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program will give stock options to
eligible full-time and part-time regular employees in domestic and
international companies/locations.
? The grant of non-qualified stock options will equal 25% of annual base
salary (5% of annual base salary for each year of a 5-year period) on
December 29, 2000. (Salary calculation and value may vary in some
international locations.)
? The Board will grant the stock options on December 29, 2000.
? Eligible employees hired in subsequent years will receive a prorated grant
of stock options.

Why commit your talent and energy to Enron?  EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option
Program, among other good reasons( that,s why.

In the coming weeks, you will be receiving more details about EnronOptions )
Your Stock Option Program.  To provide information and answer your questions,
we will introduce a special link on the Human Resources web-site, host
several eSpeak sessions and continue to communicate with you on a regular
basis.  In the meantime, if you have immediate questions, please contact your
Human Resources representative.

Note: In addition to final approval by Enron,s Board of Directors, granting
of options will be subject to New York Stock Exchange and state and federal
regulatory requirements.  It is expected that EnronOptions ) Your Stock
Option Program will be available to most Enron employees; however, some Enron
companies, employees may not be eligible due to legal, accounting, tax, labor
or business issues.  As you know, Enron changes to meet the needs of the
marketplaces we serve.  Given that need to change, we will continue to refine
the eligibility for EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program and will
communicate more details throughout the year with final eligibility being
determined on December 29, 2000.


Today, FERC Staff held its conference to discuss what regulatory changes are
necessary to promote further market liquidity.  The conference was fairly
well attended by FERC staff, including Dan Larcamp and  Shelton Cannon.

Some common themes:
Gas markets are generally well functioning and major changes are not
necessary.
Commodity markets are very liquid.
FERC policies, GISB and Order 637 have helped to make capacity markets more
liquid.
Shippers are unhappy with tighter tolerances and new balancing services in
Order No. 637 compliance filings.
Standardization is necessary to promote liquidity (with pipelines making the
distinction that standardization of transactional protocols is a good idea,
standardization of product offerings is not).
There is very little consensus on further areas for change.  In nearly every
case, a change advocated by one shipper group is opposed by another.
In any event, most said that now is not the time for sweeping changes.

Areas without consensus:
Shipper-must-have-title rule.  LDCs argue it should be removed; while Process
Gas and producers think that removal will undermine the capacity release
market.
Production area rate design.  LDCs argued that they need the ability to buy
service downstrream of a market pool.  Reliant and Koch also argued that
pipelines should have to have separately stated production and market rates.
The producers opposed any attempt to shift costs to the production area.
SFV.  East Coast LDCs, Michcon, and APGA argued for moving off of SFV.  The
producers and industrials oppose.  Illinois Power/Dynegy also argued for
moving off SFV.

LDC Positions
The LDCs main themes were removing the shipper-must-have-title and enabling
LDCs to hold space downstream of market centers.  However, they also argued
that  pipelines should not be permitted to offer new services to the electric
generation market that reduce the flexibilities LDCs have historically
enjoyed since the system was built for LDCs .   This is the point that AGA
raised in the blanket intervention to all Order 637 compliance filings.
Carl Levander of Columbia did a nice job of refuting the notion that LDCs are
entitled to unwritten flexibility that they have enjoyed in the past on a
best efforts basis, perhaps in part due to the fact that the pipeline may not
have been fully subscribed.  LDCs, generally stating that 637 compliance
filings did a poor job of allowing capacity segmentation, continued to stress
the need for segmentation, including "geographical segmentation of ROFR
capacity."

Some Specific Proposals
NGSA called for more targeted information to be included in Form 2 filings.
A number of customer groups noted the need for more and better information,
though specific needs were not well defined.
Several parties ask FERC to reconsider national standardized penalties
(especially given expected high prices this winter and the possibility for
arbitrage).
Alliance of Energy Suppliers (marketing arm of EEI) called for a dialogue
between power generators and INGAA to develop a new firm tariff with hourly
variability.  They also called for a change in GISB nomination deadlines to
match the power grid (Dan Larcamp asked whether EEI is open to efforts to
standardize scheduling times across the power grid as well).
The GISB End-User group (represented by Salt River Project)  complained about
the need to standardize the confirmation process and called for gas
transactions to be "tagged" like electric transactions.

E-Commerce and Capacity Trading
Dave Neubaurer did a great job of driving home the themes that capacity
trading can occur if FERC and industry are willing to allow more speedy
transactions, remove posting periods and long contract execution periods.  He
made an effective case that no major regulatory changes are necessary.
Robert Levin of the NY Mercantile Exchange echoed this theme, admonishing the
FERC not to micro-manage the types of trading platforms or to try to insist
on a single platform.  He said that liquidity cannot be legislated.  From his
perspective, natural gas markets are the best functioning commodity markets
in the world.  FERC should worry about transferring the "good stuff" from
natural gas to electric markets, not the reverse.


Ricki is still sick and will be out again today.
slb


i assumed it was intentional, but wanted to make sure.  for the moment it
works, but if our volumes continue to rise, we need to move to absolute
numbers


Fireman Monti drops drawers and blows the envelope on the tat mo, say scientists measuring tat mo boundary conditions for the intergalactic culinary mindstate institute.  Wolfgang Puck remarked, "I can't believe this. Let's have a pahty".

--- North Coast Hearald, August 20, 2001


Hi Richard  Ring,

My name is Chris Kulseth. I am the president of C3IPros.  We are a
company that specializes in Energy Management software. We have
been in this business for six years and know what electric utilities
need and want.

I am contacting you to let you know about our ETag 1.7 products and
about our transaction scheduling product. The Etag 1.7 deadline of
March 6 is looming fast.

Both products are based on Java technology. This allows us to run these
packages on almost any platform. The great benefit of this is that
these products can run on existing platforms thus freeing up machines
and user's desk space. No more multiple keyboards! Cut and paste
between applications becomes available.

Both products offer many features such as logging, user security and
email alerts.

-----------------------------------------
SIAM ETag 1.7 - Schedule Information and Account Management is an
Electronic Tagging software product designed to:

- manage the technical and regulatory aspects of electronic tagging
- provide the NERC Etag 1.7 solutions for support of the control area
operators, market agents and approval managers.

SIAM ETag 1.7 offers a very affordable system to provide real time
NERC Electronic Tagging 1.7. Using Java based technology, SIAM ETag 1.7
offers the flexibility and scalability to meet your needs and provide
an efficient operating environment.

-----------------------------------------
SIAM - Schedule Information and Account Management is an integrated
software suite designed to:

-manage the technical and regulatory aspects of energy delivery
-provide the business solutions and support for the Control Area (CA)
Operator.

SIAM offers a comprehensive system to provide real time information,
adjust scheduling, accommodate trades, manage financial requirements,
and meet NERC requirements.  Using Java based technology, SIAM offers
the flexibility and scalability to meet your needs and provide an
efficient operating environment.

Please contact me at my number or email me for more information.

We stand ready to provide the best products and service available.

Thanks.

Chris Kulseth
-----------------------------------------
Chris Kulseth
C3IPros - Computer Contract Consultants, Inc.
chrisk@c3ipros.com    612-237-9975    www.c3ipros.com
!
!
!
!


Hi back!  and Happy New Year too!  To what do I owe this small pleasure?  I'm
fine in Texas, still hanging out with Phoebe and Chloe, working hard, etc.
Where are you living these days?  N.O.?  Atlanta?  Memphis?  Eleuthra?  St.
Petersburg?  Amelia Island Plantation?  I've simply lost track!  As for me,
well, I lead the simple life, own a little house in West University, own a
little car (I had to buy a new one recently - the 14-year old 380 SE started
scaring me a bit), you know, the usual.  Are you selling burgers up and down
the east coast?  Have you gone international?  In a new franchise business?
How's your family?

Got to get back to work!  This weekend I'm off to Sao Paulo and Buenos Aires
on business.  SARA

SamChawk@aol.com on 09/11/99 07:48:44 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hi

Sara-  Happy New Year, stranger!   Hope all is well. Do you miss me?   SAM


Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


Amy,

I think that Rick Causey wants simply to obtain more information to make a
reasonable decision.

We should cancel the meeting for the time being and let Rick  obtain
clarification of some issues from AA. I would agree that AA came up with a
rather
vague concept of what they want to accomplish.

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MIT/AA Lab- next meeting

Vince: Can you shed any light on this? I'm confused (really confused)....
Do you think this means the decision to go ahead/not is going to be made only
by Kean, Buy and Koening? And
Do you think this means that we shouldn't meet on Thurs?
Personally, I think Enron really needs to meet on Thurs to buckle down and
start developing some idea of needs/wants with regard to the outcomes of the
Lab.
From a practical perspective, if we can't get what we want from this whole
thing, Rick's issue of "where AA is going with this" is really a mute point,
isn't it? So a working meeting might really be worth the effort.
Would appreciate your insight and advice.
Thanks.
Amy

---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Oberg/HOU/EES on 08/07/2000 09:15 AM
---------------------------

Richard Causey@ENRON
08/07/2000 09:07 AM
To: Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

I have discussed with AA and they are following up.  If I am the agenda, I
would cancel the meeting and when I hear from AA, I will e mail everyone.  I
would suggest we not hold a meeting until Kean, Buy , Koenig and I can all
come so that we can truly move forward (or decide not to).  Let me know what
you decide.  Thanks.  Rick

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

Rick: just wanted to highlight that you ARE the agenda for this meeting (see
initial notice, agenda). Let me know if there's anything I can do for you.
Amy

---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Oberg/HOU/EES on 08/07/2000 08:19 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Carol Moffett                           08/03/2000 04:21 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-6658 Phone
  888-782-3518 Pager
  EB 613b

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christie Connell/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joannie
Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: MEETING CONFIRMED:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

This will confirm the meeting requested below.  Please note, all invitees are
not available, but the confirmed meeting time is the best time for most of
the invitees.

 Date: Thursday - August 10
 Time: 11:00a to noon
 Place: Conference Room 4741
 Confirmed Attendees: Rick Causey
  Marie Hejka
  Steve Kean
  Amy Oberg
  Mark Palmer
  Mark Ruane

Thanks for your help, everyone.

---------------------- Forwarded by Carol Moffett/HOU/EES on 08/03/2000 04:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Carol Moffett                           08/02/2000 03:44 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-6658 Phone
  888-782-3518 Pager
  EB 613b

To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura
Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Valencia/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patty
Pennington/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: MEETING REQUEST:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

Good afternoon.  I am assisting Amy Oberg with setting up a meeting among the
individuals listed below.  Would you be so kind as to review their calendars
and let me know if they are available during any of the suggested meeting
times.

Meeting Topic:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab
Meeting Purpose:  Follow up to discussion from 8/1/00; Rick Causey to brief
group on
conversations w/ AA regarding "where they intend to go with this effort".
Attendees: Steve Kean
 Vince Kaminski
 Rick Buy
 Rick Causey
 Mark Ruane
 Mark Koenig
 Mark Palmer
 Amy Oberg
 Marie Hejka

Suggested Meeting Dates and Times:
Thursday - August 10 anytime between 8:00a and 10:00a
Thursday - August 10 11:00 to noon
Friday - August 11   anytime between 8:00a and 9:30a
Friday - August 11 1:00p to 2:00p

Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY
DAILY FEATURE
is now available on nationaljournal.com:
Click Here: http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
People Column: Senior Writer Bara Vaida looks at the top movers and shakers
in high-tech policy
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/people/peop011023.htm

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- BILLWATCH: Constantly Updated Tracking Of Key Legislation
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/bills/billprogress.htm

-- BUDGET BATTLES: Already Talking About Fiscal 2003 Approps
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/budget.htm

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------
National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/05/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	5,686
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,199
Total Life to Date Transactions	499,401

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/05/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,845	79%
Enron Europe Limited	230	45%
Global Products	228	36%
Enron Metals	383	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	54%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	5,437,653,224
MTD	16,875,412,478
LTD	296,045,937,343
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,213,819,755

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	19,465,339,625

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	595
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,162
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,274
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,913


Lucy:
I heard back from Mark and he seemed receptive to our suggestion to consider
you for the legal asst. position.  Sounded like he wnted to think about it
over the weekend.  I'll keep you posted.
Carol


Can you see if you can float out these tickets for tonights game... I cannot make it. I have all 4.

BT


I do not know of any reason that they should not be able to transact UK oil
and products. However, it would be best to also check with London on this
request.

	Tana Jones
	10/12/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I don't see any problem with this request, do you?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 11:55 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	10/12/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Please let me know if this request is OK?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
10/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

We are ok with this request for Utilicorp United, Inc.

brant

From:  Stephanie Sever
     10/12/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     10/12/2000 10:20 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

Tom -

What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753


Michelle:

	It was great to finally talk with you.  Here is some information on
the new power plants planned in the Bakersfield area.  This file is a couple
of years old and I quickly added in some of the latest information but some
of the information here is still quite outdated.  However, this document has
some rough diagrams of the area so you can see where the projects are
located.  The California Energy Commission has some information on their web
site about these projects as well.

	I'll talk to you soon.

	Ben Campbell

	 <<Kern County Power Plants.doc>>


Did this get taken care of?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
04/05/2000 10:13 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           04/04/2000 01:38 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Citygate Production

Yes, CES Retail did take this gas for Jan, Feb & March.  The Canonsburg
office was responsible for the noms.
 Yes, the deal needs to be input into Sitata.  Maybe, Terry can input.  Wade
has copies of the monthly invoices from T & F Operating for all three months.

Deal details:
Volume = 10,000 MCF per month
Price for Jan, Feb & Mar = $3.465 / MCF
I would not worry about the Mcf issue here.  Just put the volumes and price
in and pay the bill.
John

Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:08 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Citygate Production

Hey John, did CES take this gas for Jan, Feb, and Mar?  Wade would like to
see this deal in the system.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 01:06
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/04/2000 12:02 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Citygate Production

T&F Operating has sent ENA a "breach of contract" letter and is requesting to
terminate the contract effective 4/1/2000.

Colleen, I will give you a copy of the letter that was faxed to John Singer.

CES did a buy/sale behind Penn Fuel on CGAS for 1 year starting Nov 1, 1999.
T&F is the supplier and Glenn Gary was the market.   The market went away
effective 4/1/2000 and ENA/EES has no other market behind this part of Penn
Fuel's system.  We checked with the Penn Fuel asset management deal and
according to Penn Fuel, they can't take it either.

T&F is looking for their payment for Jan, Feb, and Mar, and T&F will waive
any and all "cover" cost that ENA would otherwise be liable for subsequent to
April 1, 2000.

John Singer wants to make sure we address the hedges in the books - will this
need to be included in the CES true-up?  Also, John wants to know if he
should sign the letter?.  Colleen, I told John you would anwser that question.


How was the trip?  NY was great, but I got back so late, you wouldn't
believe, I missed my flight to Jackson.  I was pissed.


SMITH, MATHEW D,

The PEP system closes on Friday, May 25, 2001

Our records indicate that you have been requested to provide feedback on one or more Enron employees.  The deadline for completing feedback is Friday,  May 25th.

Below is a list of feedback requests with a status of "OPEN".  Please complete or decline these requests as soon as possible by logging into PEP at http://pep.enron.com and selecting Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.

If you have any questions, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  713-853-4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44 207 783 4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

Employee Name:
ALEXANDER, KIM
PIAZZE, TARA
WANG, YAN
WOODSTROM, DAVID


-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:11 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Fw: RE: Video Cards

Can you forward to Paul...

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: O'Gorman, Karon <Karon.O'Gorman@ENRON.com>
To: McFarland, Jean <Jean.McFarland@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Oct 31 14:12:48 2001
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Ticket 32879 assigned to Robert Barker to install these

-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:01 PM
To: O'Gorman, Karon
Subject: FW: Video Cards

Karon -- what is the status of Paul's flat panels?

-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Steward, Larry
Cc: Abshire, Scott; O'Gorman, Karon
Subject: RE: Video Cards

I know but... this name is not simple to spell or remember.   His name is Paul Y'Barbo.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steward, Larry
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:21 PM
To: McFarland, Jean
Cc: Abshire, Scott; O'Gorman, Karon
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Jean,
It will be very beneficial if you could come up with the names.

Thanks,
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Steward, Larry
Cc: Abshire, Scott; O'Gorman, Karon
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Paul... something.  I'll try and get his last name.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steward, Larry
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:48 AM
To: McFarland, Jean; O'Gorman, Karon
Cc: Abshire, Scott
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Jean,
What are the names for the new persons? It makes it easier to know up front so we can have the tech dispatch the equipment.

Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Steward, Larry; O'Gorman, Karon
Cc: Abshire, Scott
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Karon - please order another card and 2 flat panels for the new person in Kim Watson's group.   Thanks.  Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Steward, Larry
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:39 AM
To: McFarland, Jean; O'Gorman, Karon
Cc: Abshire, Scott
Subject: RE: Video Cards

Jean
This will probably be under $500. Can you add this to another order?
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:30 PM
To: O'Gorman, Karon
Cc: Abshire, Scott; Steward, Larry
Subject: Video Cards

Karon -- How about you order a 2 extra of the standard dual video cards and charge to 179002.go.mkgt code... that way I'll always have some ready since they are so hard to get in a timely manner.  ????

Larry/Scott -- any objections?


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012304.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


are we hitting sierra tomorrow?


---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Missy Stevens
03/29/2000 12:58 PM
To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Hi - I can't find that buzz word bingo thing, but I did find this...  :)

---------------------- Forwarded by Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

John Walt
09/01/99 03:55 PM
To: Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Is this the process you have put in place for budgeting?

 - problem-.jpg


All,
In the future, please refrain from parking in the area on the west side of the building when working at or visiting the Austin Facility.  This area is reserved for General Motors.  It is easily identified.  The lot has blue striping and is marked "GM Parking Only". In most cases, there is ample parking in the front, rear and on the east side of the building. In the rare instance that parking is unavailable, please check in at the security desk and you will be directed to an overflow parking area.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Wes Holt
Facilities Coordinator
ERCOT
Office 512-225-7140
Fax 512-225-7169
Pager 1-888-789-6939
Email  wholt@ercot.com


Tom - another strike thrown at the entrenched players!  Keep this up and you
guys will control every transportation asset in the UK.

I am looking forward to moving our transportation business into continental
Europe and South Africa.

 Congratulations to you and your team.  Keep the pressure on.

George

Tom Kearney
09/01/2000 12:26 PM
To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, John Moran/LON/ECT@ECT, Riaz
Rizvi/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tiffany Cochran/LON/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth McCarthy/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez
Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kent/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott
Longmore/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace Parker/LON/ECT@ECT,
Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Tani
Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Olivier Herbelot/LON/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Moises Woll/LON/ECT@ECT, Otto Von Schwerin/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale
Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew Landy/OSL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Grossman/LON/ECT@ECT, James Sandt/LON/ECT@ECT, Mahesh
Lakhani/LON/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Meindert Witteveen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: SIGNED: Redcar Throughput Services Agreement

On August 31 (yesterday) we signed an Agreement with Corus UK Limited
(formerly British Steel) for Throughput Services at the Redcar Facility in
northeastern England.

In exchange for a UKo2.5 million prepay to cover the cost of 750,000 tons of
planned imports to Redcar, the deal gives Enron:

the right but not the obligation to import up to all available third party
capacity (ca. 2 million tons per year) at the Redcar Facility for a term of 5
years;
through an incentivised price schedule, a throughput rate that falls with
each vessel which passes through the facility;
a price schedule that is not adjusted for inflation during the entire 5 year
contract term;
the unrestricted right to resell any or all slots to third parties during the
5 year contract term;

Coupled with our recent deal with Immingham (5 years of free options for the
full coal import capacity at new HIT Terminal), Enron Coal Services has a
unique and unrivalled position in ports and rail vis-a-vis all the major UK
coal importers.   Together with the recent Freightliner deal, Enron has
constructed the lowest cost and longest term "Coal Pipeline" to the major UK
coal-fired generators (pls. see attached map)

As a result, Enron is currently the only coal supplier in the UK with:

5 year call options on the available capacity of Redcar and HIT, the two most
important coal import facilities in the UK;
the ability to provide competitive rail to our customers from Redcar and
Immingham.

We have opted not to publicise this transaction in order not to spook our
current and potential clients in the Aire and Trent Valleys.   We would
prefer the market to continue to think that we are offering aggressive
multi-year delivered coal prices "because we just don't know what we are
doing."  Thanks for keeping this quiet.

Many thanks to Steve Pirozzi, John Moran, Pierre Aury, Cornelia Luptowitsch,
Chris Connelly, Robert Quick, Matt Arnold, Stu Staley and the entire Enron
Coal Team!


<<2000-DJ-NP-INDEXES-HIST.xls>>  <<2000-DJ-SP-INDEXES-HIST.xls>>

 - 2000-DJ-NP-INDEXES-HIST.xls
 - 2000-DJ-SP-INDEXES-HIST.xls


I spoke with Steve Saye at WIC today and he said that they interpret the
tarrif to read that a release done at the full negotiated contract rate is
the same as the maximum rate. Therefore we can release at the $.12 rate.  He
also stated that he would begin the approval process with the banks for the
release but thought that there would be no problem with Huber's credit.  He
did state that the bank approval timing was out of his control but he would
try to expedite it. In addition, he felt that the best way to do the release
was to do it  with the first bidder meeting minimum terms and have Huber
ready to take it.  He said that it would not have to be noticed ahead of time
so noone would know that it was going  to hit the board.

My question is, can we get the contract with Huber signed prior to receiving
the bank approval for the WIC peice?

Mark


DEFS Finishes 2000 With Multiple Transactions

Duke Energy Field Services (DEFS) finished off 2000 with a bang by completing
three year-end asset transactions. First, the company finalized the $91
million sale of natural gas liquid (NGL) pipeline assets to TEPPCO Crude
Pipeline, L.P., then it completed the purchase of certain natural gas
pipeline assets from El Paso Field Services in two separate deals for an
undisclosed sum.

The assets sold to TEPPCO include the Panola Pipeline and the San Jacinto
Pipeline, both of which are NGL pipelines. Under the agreement, TEPPCO also
agreed to take over the lease of a 34-mile condensate pipeline. The three
pipelines included in the sale all originate at DEFS' East Texas Plant
Complex located in Panola County, TX.

"This sale underscores our strategy of growing earnings through our TEPPCO
master limited partnership," said Jim Mogg, CEO of DEFS. "In 2000, we almost
doubled the distribution that DEFS received as the general partner of TEPPCO
Partners, L.P., and at the same time increased the distribution to limited
partnership unitholders."

In the second transaction, which the company completed on Dec. 28, 2000, DEFS
acquired 100% of Gas Transmission Teco, Inc.'s common stock. The company owns
interests in the 500-mile Teco intrastate natural gas pipeline in Texas, and
was purchased from El Paso Field Services.

Included in the assets, DEFS gained a 50% interest in the El Paso-operated
West Texas Line which travels from Waha to New Braunfels, a 100% interest in
the Guadalupe Line that travels from New Braunfels to Dewville, and a 50%
interest in the MidTex Line from Dewville to Katy. DEFS also received several
supply lines and related assets with the acquisition.

DEFS said the lines combined have a 250 MMcf/d of natural gas capacity, and
extend from Waha in West Texas to Katy. The company also noted that the lines
interconnect five DEFS plants with a combined processing capacity of 640
MMcf/d.

"The timely addition of this strategic system provides DEFS with increased
marketing opportunities for the gas from these plants," said Mogg. "The lines
also allow DEFS new access to the growing San Antonio/Austin corridor."

In DEFS' third end of the year transaction, the company acquired El Paso
Field Services' 50% interest in the 265-mile San Jacinto natural gas
pipeline. The transaction brings DEFS' ownership up to 100%. The San Jacinto
line provides gas gathering and transportation services along the Texas Gulf
Coast, with delivery to a third party and two DEFS gas processing plants.

DEFS was formed last year when Duke Energy and Phillips Petroleum combined
their natural gas gathering and processing businesses. Duke Energy holds a
70% stake in the company while Phillips retains a 30% share.


Darren:

 The following is the potential new wellhead volume for January 2000 that I
am currently aware of.   This was not included in the production estimate
number given by Vance.

  EOG-Hortense #1, Polk County, New Meter, 5,000 Mmbtu /day

  Brayton Operating -Brayton - Drushell #1, Jackson County,  Possibly new
meter or Meter 9720, 3,000 Mmbtu/day

 Let me know if you have any questions,

 Susan x 33321


Dear Anthony,

As you are aware, Band-X India is representing GLOBAL SWITCH's interest in
your facility in Mumbai.  We have requested your Mumbai team for information
pertaining to the business status - as it will only aid us in finalising a
suitable offer.

I have expressed clearly and at numerous occasions that we are not
competitors (see mail below) - which seems to be why we have not been given
any information / support in processing our interest.

As representatives it is expected that we represent the clients interests in
full - in terms of expression of interest to you (which has been expressed
directly via Global Switch); evaluation of the opportunity and assistance in
formulation of offer.

FYI BSPL is in receipt of NDAs signed by Band-X as well as Global Switch.  I
would appreciate if you could assist in ensuring that we receive the
necessary information at the earliest.

Regards,
Pran Mehra

CEO, Band-X India

-----Original Message-----
From: Rahul.Basu@enron.com [mailto:Rahul.Basu@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:43
To: pran.mehra@band-x.com
Subject:

Pran,

I'm not at all clear where you are with GS - are they planning to put in an
offer ?

On the marketing side, I am uncomfortable releasing specific information
until I have the conversation with GS and gauge their interest, esp. since
Band-X are potential direct competitors.

Rahul

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 02:24
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/31/2000 11:47 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hi team.  Guess what day it is??!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000 11:46
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/30/99 12:16 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 12:16
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/23/99 08:34 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hey team!  I probably won't be here when these are due.  After you finish
working on the sheet, print one copy for Kim Brown.

Thanks :)


Got it !!

Thanks,

Kathy


Ken

I mentioned in a voicemail today that you should be receiving a phone call
from James (Jimbo) Moffet (504) 582-4000.  He is Chairman of Freeport McMahon
in New Orleans.  James had mentioned to Thomas Boettcher & Michael Hutchinson
in our Metals group that he knew you and wanted to make sure you were
supportive of our discussions with them.  Here is the background on a
possible acquisition that we have brought up with them:

            Enron Metals is very interested in pursuing further discussions
with Atlantic Copper on the acquisition of their smelter in Spain.  Estimated
capital would be US$350 Million.  Acquiring this asset gives us the
opportunity to build copper and copper concentrate positions and more
effectively managing our positions in the market place. We would finance this
off balance sheet.

 Mr. James Targetta, head of Atlantic Copper (copper smelter and refinery in
Spain and fully owned by Freeport McMoran) had a conversation with James
Moffet, Chairman of Freeport McMoran last Friday informing him about our
preliminary conversations.   Moffet advised Targetta not to proceed further
until he speaks to you since he has known you for 25 years.

 In addition, Targetta mentioned the possibility for Enron purchasing all the
copper mining activities of  Freeport McMoran which would leave them as an
oil and exploration company.

We think there are some great possibilities here.

If you have not heard from him in the next few days, I would really
appreciate you giving Moffet a call.   I would be more than happy to get a
more extensive briefing for you if you think you need it.   I look forward to
discussing this further with you.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
05:03 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 09/08/2000 04:55:28 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg091100.pdf


going to be more like 6 pm my time for hte background.  my apologies.


Jeff and I met with Troy Blakney this morning - he has agreed to join the
selection committee. We plan to meet tomorrow with Red Duke (lunch) and Roel
Campos (breakfast). Jeff has spoken with Gerald Smith and he has also agreed
to join the committee.

In terms of an action plan:
Once we have finalized the committee members, I will schedule a meeting
(preferably before the Febr. 1 scheduled news conference) with all members to
offer them an opportunity to meet one another and discuss how we will proceed.
Next, I will begin scheduling meetings with some key people that  would
provide the committee with important insight into the key issues facing the
HFD. Jeff suggested possibly blocking out an entire day where the committee
members would speak to these individuals back to back in 1 or 2 hour time
slots.
Then, a full day will be blocked out where the committee members will
interview the approximate 10 identified candidates.
The committee will then meet (half a day?) to narrow the list of 10 down to 3.
The three final candidates will be presented to the Mayor.

Lisa


Eric,
I was examining EGM's businesses for 2001 and I wanted to ask you a question
about your specific business.  As you examine your goals and objectives, I
would like to know what you think I could do to help you accomplish your
plan.  Please send me a return email with 3 specific items that I could do
personally to add to your business.

Thanks,
Mike


In most cases, ENA will be a net buyer from Tenaska IV for activity related
to the Cleburne plant.  However, for October 2000, the plant was down the
majority of the month and ENA sold off the supply, resulting in ENA owing
money to Tenaska IV.

I have created deal 529856 with a demand of $1,798,389.73, which is the
calculated amount of income on the Cleburne desk. (Please see the attached
schedule.)   We need to pass this income on to Tenaska IV.  Do we need to pay
this amount (wire from ENA to Tenaska IV) or is there another way to do
this?  This is the case for October 2000 and could possibly happen again in
the future.

Greg, Troy, Jim - Please let me know what you think about settling this.

Megan - Don't pay the amount until we here from the Greg, Troy and Jim.
Also, make sure that we have received dollars from the spot sales before we
reimburse Tenaska IV.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
04:37 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 09:18 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tenaska IV 10/00

We have actuals.  The larger of the two volumes is 1,395,000, which is
45,000/day, so the demand rate in deal 514353 is fine.  I am having a
problem, though, with the way it is coming to settlements.  It is showing up
with a Jan 2003 delivery date.  I think the demand fee needs to be on 10/1
only.  Right now, it is on a line with a date of 10/1/00 to 12/31/36.   I
think this is confusing the system some how.  Also, we still need the
purchase deal for Tenaska IV.  It should be for a demand fee of $2,571,135.73
booked to the Cleburne desk.  We actually owe $1,798,389.73, but I need to
net the Tenaska IV sales with the purchase to clear those receivables.  James
is calling me every day asking for an update.  Do you know when we will be
able to get this in the system?  I have attached my spreadsheet so you can
see the numbers.

Megan


I do now!! I'm a changed man, after this is all over, Jerry and I are going
to buy motorcycles and take a bike trip.  He has started shopping.  Wanna buy
93 acres in East Texas??


---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
06:18 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
09/18/2000 02:00 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy
Degeyter/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart
Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Mead/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Brett
Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alonzo
Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian
Robinhold/PDX/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa R Kotrla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Name Change-BP Energy Company

Please note the following changes:
Amoco Energy Trading Corporation (Amoco)
Is now
BP Energy Company


You're a Registered Fool!

Email Address: steve.kean@enron.com

To "activate" your account, go to:

http://boards.fool.com/Drano.asp?u=37151368&c=gwHQBDNeAU6zvCKZ

You'll need to type in the password you created when you registered to
make it all work.

And if you ever forget your password, let us know at
http://www.fool.com/denied.asp
We have a way to help you change it.  We can't send your password to
you (because we don't actually know what it is) but we can help you
make it something new.

AMONG THE MANY BENEFITS OF BEING REGISTERED:

	-- Ask any financial question you have
	http://boards.fool.com

	-- Track your portfolio against the market
	http://portfolio.fool.com

	--Personalize your experience on the site
	http://my.fool.com

	--Choose a Discount Broker
	http://broker.fool.com

TWO OTHER PLACES TO START

	-- A good introduction to all that we offer
	http://www.fool.com/about/site/new/foolishwelcome.htm

	-- A list of this week's content
	http://www.fool.com/foolwatch/foolwatch.htm

Finally, if you run into any trouble, drop an email to
FoolBoards@fool.com.  And the terms and conditions of being
registered are covered in our Fool's Rules:
http://www.fool.com/help/foolsrules.htm

Have a great time out there!

David and Tom Gardner


ditto credit -- no power CPs.

leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: EOL Approvals: 10-01-01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Reves, Brant; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Thakkar, Ami; Piotrowski, Joseph; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer
Cc:	Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	EOL Approvals: 10-01-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-01-01.xls >>
Regards,

Tom Moran


The answer is yes but I would like to hear from Barbara or Shonnie before I
give you the go-ahead. Ladies?

	Darren P Adamik
	10/06/2000 03:25 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Retention Policy on Trading Tapes

Richard,

Enron Net Works currently supports the joint venture between Enron and Texaco
called Bridgeline in the Three Allen Center Building.  My group supports the
Trading telephony and recording equipment for this company.  My question is
does this new audio retention policy cover this operating company or not
since we do support them?

Regards,
Darren Adamik
Mgr.-Trading Technology
Enron Net Works
713-853-4764

---------------------- Forwarded by Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------
To: Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Hill/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Peebles/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Retention Policy on Trading Tapes

Make sure we take care of this asap.

From: Mark E Haedicke on 09/27/2000 05:17 PM
Sent by: Janette Elbertson
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, C John
Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Knight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha
Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tonai
Lehr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darlene C
Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela McCulloch/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pilar Cerezo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cherylene R
Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy R Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jewell Wade/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Retention Policy on Trading Tapes

Effective October 15, 2000, the retention period on tape recordings of trades
done by telephone will be reduced from four months to one month.  The tapes
regarding significant transactions may be retained for such longer period as
approved in writing by both the Head Trader and the General Counsel.  Please
propose those significant transactions on which you may wish to retain the
tapes, prior to October 15, 2000, since the tapes on conversations older than
one month (except with respect to litigation matters) will be destroyed on
that date.  If you have any questions, please contact Mark Haedicke or
Richard Sanders.

John Lavorato and Mark Haedicke


The California ISO's Answer to the CPUC's Protest argues your third
point---that an Order 614 filing is no place to raise substantive issues.  If
we make this argument we should acknowledge, join, or distinguish the ISO's
view in our brief.

Mary Hain
11/27/2000 12:21 PM
To: Richard Sanders, gfergus@brobeck.com, mday@gmssr.com
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, carrrn@bracepatt.com, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Richard Shapiro, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Joe
Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides,
Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CPUC protest at FERC re ISO confidentiality

The CPUC has protested the ISO's recent replacement of Volume Nos. I and II
of its tariff.  The ISO's tariff filing does not propose changes to any
substantive provision and is intended to be an uncontroversial filing to
comply with the designation and formatting requirements of FERC's Order 614.
Nevertheless, the CPUC:

Asks FERC to reject and modify the confidentiality and disclosure provisions
of the tariff such that they do not apply to requests for information from
California state agencies with statutory responsibilities related to
regulation or oversight of the electric industry.  CPUC asks the provisions
be modified to require the ISO to respond to such requests in the same manner
as it responds to data requests from FERC itself.
Points out that the ISO has used this provision to refuse to provide
responses to the CPUC's subpoena including bid data.
Also asserts that the Western System Coordinating Council's (WSCC) extra high
voltage (EHV) data is available in real time to all WSCC members, including
market participants.

I was wondering if others agree we should file an answer to the CPUC's
answer, stating the following.

The ISO should make all market information available to all market
participants as we laid out in our comments on the FERC's November 1 order.
Not all market participants get EHV data - since [date?] the ISO has refused
to provide this information to the WSCC unless the WSCC keeps this
information confidential, due to its tariff's confidentiality provisions.
Accordingly the ISO's data is now only being provided to those market
participants with control areas. However, we have no way of knowing, and
therefore assume that utilities, munis, and Federal Power Marketing
Administrations with control areas are providing this information to their
merchant function.  This access to market information is unduly
discriminatory.  To rectify this undue discrimination, the FERC should delete
the confidentiality provision altogether.
The CPUC's filing is procedurally defective in that the ISO did not change
the confidentiality provision of its tariff so the CPUC's filing should have
been in a complaint in which it would have the burden of proof.  Therefore,
the FERC should dismiss the CPUC's filing.


Where is the DPOS folder?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:10 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Abel, Chris
Cc:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: DPOS

No prob.  Can you request DPOS through ERequest - I believe we still do it that way.

My group is now:

Shona
Chris
Susie Ayala
Susan Trevino

I'm putting together a list of everything we used to do and working on determining which things we should prioritize.  Until I complete that, can you ensure that all requests for info go through me?

Thanks a million!

Shona

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	Wilson, Shona; Abel, Chris
Cc:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	DPOS

Shona -

Can you get Stacey and I access to the DPR in executive viewer.  Also,  can you get us acess to the DPOS folder so that we can link in for requests that are coming in from the banks.

Thanks


Tana, Chris amended the payment terms to mirror the APB quarterly payments.  Please check to make sure it is ok. then send for signature.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris S. Edmonds [mailto:chris.edmonds@truequote.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Shults, Bob
Cc: Joe Wright (E-mail)
Subject: FW: BETA and Fee Agreement - First Energy and Norwegian Energy

Bob:

Here are the changes necessary to complete the agreements in a manner that
mirrors APB's documents.  Please let me know if you have any questions or
concerns with these changes.

Thanks,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Wright
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Chris Edmonds
Subject: RE: BETA and Fee Agreement - First Energy and Norwegian Energy

my redline comments.  all my changes make the NEB agreements consistent with
the APB agreements.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Edmonds
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Joe Wright
Subject: RE: BETA and Fee Agreement - First Energy and Norwegian Energy

Joe:

The one item that does not mesh with our agreement is the payment terms
outlined in the Fee Agreement document.  If you remember, we pay this fee on
a quarterly basis.  I have already called Bob and informed him we would be
changing this section to mirror the agreement for APB.  The only difference
is the price!

Thanks,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Wright
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 8:45 AM
To: Chris Edmonds; Todd Creek
Subject: FW: BETA and Fee Agreement - First Energy and Norwegian Energy

fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana [mailto:Tana.Jones@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:06 PM
To: joe.wright@truequote.com
Cc: Shults, Bob; Greenberg, Mark
Subject: BETA and Fee Agreement - First Energy and Norwegian Energy

At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching our form of Broker
Electronic Transaction Agreement and Fee Agreement.  If you have any
comments or questions please call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at
(713) 345-8897or Bob Shults at (713) 853-0397.  We look forward to
hearing from you.

 <<first energy brokers.doc>>

 <<first energy brokers fee agmt.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


>Dear Evening MBA students,
>
>We enjoyed providing you with an overview of the Haas Alumni Network and
>our online services at our pizza presentations in mid-November.  Some of
>you were unable to attend our session because your class was not held on
>that Thursday night and we tried to find a suitable classroom/presentation
>space for a session this week, but there is nothing available during your
>7:30 p.m. break.  So, we have decided that we will hold more information
>sessions about the Haas Alumni Network next semester in order to
>accommodate your needs.
>
>In the meantime, if you have any questions, please consult the Haas Alumni
>Network brochure you received in your mailbox earlier this semester, visit
>our website (http://www.haas.berkeley.edu) for detailed overviews and
>updates, or contact my office at 510-642-7790 for assistance with
>registration to the Online Community.
>
>Good luck with your final projects and exams.
>
>Tenny Frost
>Director, Alumni Relations
>
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Be in CalBusiness: submit an update on your career and personal life
>http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/alumninotes
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Tenny H. Frost
>Director of Alumni Relations | Haas School of Business | University of
>California, Berkeley
>S520 Student Services Building, #1904 | Berkeley, CA | USA  94720-1904
>510/642.7790 (Alumni Relations Office) | 510/643.5340 (direct line)
>510/643.0531 (fax) | frost@haas.berkeley.edu
>http://haas.berkeley.edu/alumni
>


Monica,

Please include Rahmaan Mwongozi and Binh Pham on the distribution for the
Basis Report each night.

Thank you,
Robin


I vote for a long lunch one day of the week or 6 p.m. on Monday or 6 p.m. on
Wednesday
PL


Notice No. #01-444
December 26, 2001

TO:		NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS / MEMBER FIRMS
		NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:	J. ROBERT COLLINS, JR., PRESIDENT

RE:		EXCHANGE TO EXTEND NATURAL GAS TRADING HOURS TOMORROW

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., will extend trading in its natural
gas futures and options contracts to 2:45 PM from their regular closing time
of 2:30 PM. in response to a change in schedule, due to the holidays, of the
release by the American Gas Association (AGA) of results of its weekly
storage survey report.

The rescheduling of the announcement coincides with the expiration of the
January natural gas futures contract.  The Exchange had previously announced
that trading in natural gas futures and options will be extended until 2:45
whenever the expiration of natural gas futures occurs on a Wednesday, the
regular release date of the AGA report.


I'm looking at it right now.  Could you please email it to me?

Thanks,

Kay


Are you planning to address Lech's request?  Or is he in need of details that somebody else at Cadwalader already has?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Heinitz, Mary J.; Korkmas, Deb
Subject:	UCC filings

It might be easiest if you would send me the agreements related to the UCC
filings.  That way, I will have names, addresses, etc., in one place.
Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


The attached memo is being forwarded at the request of Jeff Hodge.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


We are probably ok for now since we got the space from networks. Rick


Kay:

It won't be a big deal if we can get these documents into Federal Express
Tuesday night for delivery Wednesday as indicated below.  If there is a
chance that Jake will be late so as to miss the Fed Ex deadline, then we
need to make alternative arrangements for signature.  Otherwise Paul
Hastings will be forced to renegotiate its legal opinion with Freshfields,
and we owe them the courtesy of letting them know this first thing Tuesday
morning, as I indicated to them as early as Thursday of last week that we
had no objection to getting at least the original membership certificate to
them by overnight delivery prior to closing to hold in escrow until the
closing, in order to satisfy opinion issues associated with perfection of
the lien on the membership interest.  Please let me know.  Thanks.

As soon as I get back to the office, I will re-check the Salmon resolutions
electing officers to confirm Chris Calger's title with Salmon and will let
you know.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:38 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: RE: Delta Documents - Addresses for Delivery

I think we will be able to get the documents you listed signed tomorrow,
but Jake won't be here before 7pm, so anything he is signing won't be ready
until Wednesday am.  It seems to me that this isn't a big deal, but I would
appreciate it if you could confirm.

Thanks,

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 02:59:43 PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Delta Documents - Addresses for Delivery

Kay:

The original membership certificate for the 80% interest should be
forwarded
for delivery on Wednesday, May 2, to the following address:

Ms. Isabel Parker
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
520 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY  10022
(phone 212-277-4025)

(Greg has asked that the membership certificate be faxed to him (fax
203-674-7646) and me (fax 713-751-3280) on Tuesday before depositing this
with the overnight courier).

If you will also be sending the original signature pages to the Turbine
Contract and the Amended and Restated LLC Agreement, these documents should
be forwarded for delivery on Wednesday, May 2, to:

Mr. Gregory F. Lang
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT  06901
(phone 203-961-7446)

I am happy to get these documents to the correct place if the signed
documents are in Houston on Tuesday.  Let me know.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: RE: Delta Documents

Please confirm absolutely that fax signatures will be sufficient.

I need the address of where to send the membership certificate.  There is
not enough time for the document to pass back through Houston if the
Portland team wants to sign the documents.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 11:21:59 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Delta Documents

Kay:

The original membership certificate needs to be in the lender's hands
(i.e.,
Isabel Parker's office) on Wednesday in order to release escrow.  If you
have the original to me by Tuesday, I can forward it to Isabel by overnight
delivery for Wednesday.  It must be an original, in that the lender's lien
on the membership interest is not perfected without possession of the
original certificate.  With respect to the remaining documents, fax copies
of signature pages on the closing date should be sufficient.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: RE: Delta Documents

The problem is in getting the original in their hands (where?) by tomorrow.
Does it have to be an original?

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 11:04:21 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Delta Documents

Kay:

Can we at least get the membership certificates signed by Tuesday?  This
seems to be the only document required in advance of closing.  If we can't
get the 80% membership interest certificate in the lender's possession on
the closing date, then there is a lien perfection issue for them to deal
with, and I thought we could accommodate their request and avoid the
problem
altogether.  Please advise, as Greg and Isabel will be calling within an
hour or so to finalize the mechanics on this.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: Re: Delta Documents

I've asked GE for the LOC by Wednesday, but I haven't gotten a response.

I'll have difficulty getting executed docs by Tuesday, since sigs are
coming from Portland.  I'll have to check to see what can be done.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 10:02:44 AM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Delta Documents

Kay:

Can you get executed documents back to me on Tuesday?  Greg has requested
that we send the original membership certificate representing the 80%
interest to the collateral agent Tuesday night by overnight delivery to
hold
in escrow until closing, in order that the collateral agent is in
possession
of the certificate (for purposes of legal opinions) upon closing on
Wednesday.  Greg is planning to fax signature pages of all of their closing
documents later today.  (I will be out of the office at a meeting with
another client most of the afternoon today).

There is one last question with GE dealing with the letter of credit for
the
retention amount, as this affects our disbursement instruction letter.  I
advised Greg that GE's normal practice was to send the retention L/C after
receipt of payment.  He is considering this, but may want to talk to GE
about the ability to present the L/C at closing.  Do you have any thoughts
on this?

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


thanks Donna!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna M. Gobely [mailto:dmgobely@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:04 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: Re: Resume for David Junus

I've sent this to three groups within our company who might have a need and
interest.  Hope things work out for him.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic13189.pcx)


Susan Bailey is running late this a.m.  Her ETA is 9-9:30 a.m.


Can someone in your office (or the Houston office) put together the execution
copies of this agreement?  We will need three originals.

Thanks,

Kay


Hi Kara,

I haven't written because I haven't figured out what we learned at the
meeting.  We can discuss next week at our conference.  We are arranging to
have Michael re-tested.  I think it is more of an issue of a difference
between potential and performance.  Michael has been tested in the past, and
tests as extraordinarily bright, but he has had some performance issues which
don't match up.  At least that's how I understand it. He just has some
disconnects which we are working to overcome, but I must admit to not
understanding it all.

I left you a note about Michael possibly missing next week.  After I dropped
him off this am, I had a thought that next week might be when they visit in
1st grade, in which case we probably wouldn't want him to miss that
opportunity.  I think he is excited about 1st grade, so you must be doing a
great job of getting the kids prepared.

Thanks for everything, and see you next week!

Kay

Kara Norris <knorris@ssfrancis.org> on 05/17/2001 03:49:09 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Michael

Kay,
I'm interested to hear how things went at the meeting.
Michael was the star of the show.  He did a great job!  Glad you both made
it.
-Kara

Kay.Mann@enron.com wrote:

> Hi Kara,
>
> Michael has been seeing a speech/language therapist, and recently she
> raised an issue about Michael's ability to "blend and unblend" sounds in
> words, specifically as it relates to reading readiness.  She had this
> conversation with Neil, so I don't know the details.  We are meeting with
> her today to get more input, but I wanted to mention it to you, just in
> case you had a comment.
>
> I know this is something we can discuss at Michael's conference on May
> 31st, but if you would like to discuss it before hand, I can be reached at
> 713 304 8716 9 (cell), 713 345 -7566 (office - just tell my asst you are
> Michael's teacher), 713 973 6325.
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> Kay


Ann & Darla,

I am attaching a spreadsheet that details what should be booked and billed to Citizens under the NEW gas daily call option/transport deal to serve the Griffith plant.  It is somewhat complicated but don't be scared - I will help both of you understand what needs to be done.  Hopefully, we can set up a procedure whereby this deal can be taken care of each month.

I think we should set up a meeting to discuss.  Let me know when you guys are available - hopefully sometime monday.

Thanks,

Kim


<<Enron is my spiritual teacher.htm>>

 - Enron is my spiritual teacher.htm


Hey Paul.

Just thought I write and see if you found out more about the snowboard, and if you are sure that you do not want anything for it?

I really appreciate it,

Geir


Team,
Attached is a file which outlines the conditions at which two phase flow will occur when 450,000 gpd of butane is injected.  Also included are details of the gas mixture.  Note that we are well under the 3% C3 limitation imposed by SoCal.  I will perform further analysis to determine how much more butane we can inject, thereby increasing our deliveries to SoCal.

It does not appear that two phase flow will occur.  There may be potential for hydrate formation once the gas is in California, however.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Ken
713-853-6317

Rick_Suderman@eott.com on 01/25/2001 02:48:59 PM
To:	randy.rice@enron.com, khyatt@enron.com, Rich.Jolly@enron.com, David.Roensch@enron.com, randy.lagrimini@enron.com, Bob.Burleson@enron.com, bob.jacobs@eott.com, , kenneth.chow@enron.com, norm.spalding@enron.com, earl.chanley@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	Mount McKinley

Team,
These are some points for discussion on the conference call next week.
In todays market, I think we all can agree that the profitability is there,
the only hurdle might be environmental or the potential for two phase flow.
If we could start with these points for discussion, and come to some
resolve on these issues, we can move to the logistics of the project.

   Results of the modeling conducted on the pipeline identifying the
   potential two phase flow. ( Ken Chow)
   Potential environmental concerns. (Emissions, Possible accumulation of
   liquid, Disposal of potential liquid).
        ( Larry Campbell )

Sense this project will be taking advantage of peaks in the market, the
most logical answer is to make this equipment portable. If we plan on long
term benefits at the California border, this could be a permit installation
with a pipeline hookup from a new rail facility in Needles. But, other
areas might be identified like inlets to power plants that justify portable
equipment with NGL supplied by truck. Supplying the butane by truck from
rail facility's like the one in Mohave, might also be a way to get the
project in Needles on-line sooner. Just some topic's for discussion.

   Natural Gas and NGL Pricing projections. ( Kevin Hyatt )
   Alternate points to inject the butane. ( Norm Spalding, Earl Chanley )
   Rail car leasing and availability. ( Randy Lagrimini, Larry Garrett )
   Rail carriers in the area, cost of transportation. ( Randy Lagrimini,
   Larry Garrett )
   Trucking companies in the area and cost of transportation. ( Randy
   Lagrimini, Larry Garrett )
   Mohave rail rack. ( Larry Garrett )
   Rail Rack construction cost. ( Randy Lagrimini, Rick Suderman )
   Pipeline construction cost from rail rack to injection point. ( Randy
   Lagrimini, Rick Suderman )
   NGL Storage cost. ( Rick Suderman )

If there is anything I have missed or need to add, let me know

Conference call number   (877) 795-3687
Code Number         625465
The call is set for 10:00 am Central Time Tuesday 1-30 but if it does not
affect anyone's schedule, I would like to change it to Wednesday 1-31.  Let
me know if this works

See you then
Rick


Hi Steve -

I won't be able to make the call on Monday.

I'd be happy to volunteer not to be on the negotiating team.  It sounds
like there's no shortage of people who want to be on the committee.

My big issue is default service.  This industry needs real customers and
the only way to get real customers is to get rid of default service.
Starting with big customers, along the lines of the core/non-core gas
model, is the best way to go.  The only way to sell this, however, is to
get the big customers to agree it's a good idea.

J. Stuart Ryan
AES Pacific
Suite 3300
100 Pine Street
San Francisco, CA   94111

office:  415 395 7887
mobile:  415 608 0080


ST- Trading (Martin)                 $26,045,166
Storage (Schwieger)                   $8,566,895
Transport (Gottlob)                      $19,858,000
Firm Trading (McClendon)       $(1,884,668)
Gas Daily                                       $(522,922)


Kurt at AECI showed AECI purchasing 96 mws at $38 for HE 9.  The P&L showed
this deal at $40.  I offered to meet in the middle at $39.  Kurt preferred to
pull the tapes and review the deal with his day guy that did the deal.  This
is a heads up on the situation.


Tana,

After having talked to Steven Kessler at Deutsche Bank, the revised language
for Section 2, Demands and Notice, is as follows:

DEMANDS AND NOTICE.  Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an
Event of Default or Termination Event, if Enron fails or refuses to pay any
Obligations and Counterparty has elected to exercise its rights under this
Guaranty, Counterparty shall make a demand upon Guarantor (hereinafter
referred to as a "Payment Demand").  A Payment Demand shall be in writing
with a specific statement that Counterparty is calling upon Guarantor to pay
under this Guaranty.  Payment shall be made promptly, but in no event more
than two (2) business days after receipt of the Payment Demand by Guarantor.
A single written Payment Demand shall be effective as to any specific default
during the continuance of such default, until Enron or Guarantor has cured
such default, and additional written demands concerning such default shall
not be required until such default is cured.


3.837

LC


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/4/01 MANAGEMENT-CRD 26,055.
1/4/01 MANAGEMENT-GAS 215,220.
1/4/01 MANAGEMENT-PWR 126,036.
1/4/01 AGG-MANAGEMENT 325,844.


What do you think?

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
To: Geaccone, Tracy <Tracy.Geaccone@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 27 12:11:47 2001
Subject: RE: NNG & TW Direct Cash Flow Estimate (11/27 -11/30)

How soon can you add things like payroll to the picture?.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW: NNG & TW Direct Cash Flow Estimate (11/27 -11/30)

FYI we sent this to treasury at their request.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kleb, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Garcia, Paul
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	NNG & TW Direct Cash Flow Estimate (11/27 -11/30)

Please find attached file. No major individual ($5.0 MM or greater) receipts or disbursements  anticipated over the last four days this month.

                           << File: NNG&TWDAY01.xls >>


Here are the times for the meetings with Finance and Accounting:
Joe Deffner on Monday at 4:00pm in his office on 28
Roger Ondreko on Tuesday at 9:00 am in his office (3358)
Let me know if this does not work for you guys.
Thanks
Ben
3-7998


Attached is a spreadsheet that shows all deals that have been completed/in-process to date.  Please take a few minutes to see if anything from your domain has been omitted.  I will post this on our Deal Area so that you can update as appropriate.

Thanks,
Ross


Daren:

Thanks again for your prompt attention to this matter, I appreciate it.

There is a slight problem however, I couldn't find the deals for July and
November 1999 in Path Manager.  I looked in Sitara and I see where you put
the deal 269123 in for May 1999, but it is also in for July and November of
2000.  Did you mean to put the deal in for July and November of 1999 and
inadvertently put it in for July and November 2000?  If so would you put it
in for July and November 1999 and send me an e-mail when you are done.
Thanks,

Fred

Daren J Farmer
06/06/2000 10:32 AM
To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Duke Energy - # 5192 - 1999 Issues

Apply deal 269123 to contract 012-27049-201.

D

Fred Boas
06/05/2000 03:50 PM
To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Energy - # 5192 - 1999 Issues

Stephanie:

Meter 6757 is done, redraft your invoice for both months and let me know if
this meter is still an issue.

Meter 5192.  I never heard back from Aimee on which Transport contract to
attach the deal 269123 to so for the months in question the gas is still
allocated to the Strangers Gas contract.  Aimee is out on vacation until
mid-June so I put in a call to Daren Farmer to find out which Transport
contract I should attach the deal 269123 to.

When I find out which transport contract to use I will set up the accounting
arrangements and then get Robert Lloyd to put the contract in POPS and
reallocate.

Fred

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           06/01/2000 08:55 AM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy - meter # 6757 , # 5192 - issue for 1999

Hey Fred,
I have the deal numbers for you for Duke Energy.  Could you please let me
know when you have allocated the gas to these meters.
I am also forwarding other emails about these two deals for your records.  If
you have any questions, please give me a call.
Thanks, Stephanie

meter # 0986757 deal # 266962     4/1/99 - 4/30/99    and   5/1/99 - 5/31/99
meter # 0985192 deal # 269123     5/1/99 - 5/31/99    and   7/1/99 - 7/31/99

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000
08:45 AM ---------------------------
   Aimee Lannou                05/11/2000 03:45 PM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Crow O'Connor Meter 6757

Fred  & Stephanie-  Meter 6757 has been reallocated.

Stephanie - What price does Duke show we owe them for the months in question?

Fred Boas
05/11/2000 03:18 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crow O'Connor Meter 6757

Aimee:
Please put the ENA 201 contract at this meter for April and May of 1999 with
the Track ID 117848 and reallocate the meter for both months.  After this is
done please let Stephanie and I know so that she can redraft her invoice the
next day after POPS bridges to MOPS.  Also with respect to the second issue
where Daren is asking for the price, Stephanie may be able to help you with
this because she has a copy of Duke's invoice.

Stephanie:
The Crow O'Conner meter is essentially fixed.  When Aimee reallocates you
will have to wait until the next day to redraft your invoice.  When Aimee
gets back with us please redraft the invoice the next day and let me know if
this issue is resolved.

Fred

Daren J Farmer
05/11/2000 02:14 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

I have created deal 266962 for the volumes at mtr 6757.

What price is Duke reporting for the mtr 5192 volumes?  The only activity
we've had out there is payback with Koch.

D

   Aimee Lannou                05/09/2000 03:30 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Have you had a chance to look at this?

- Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------
   Aimee Lannou                05/04/2000 03:26 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Can you set up new deals for meter 6757 and 5192?

 Meter 6757 Crow O'Connor -  Counterparty Duke Energy & Trading

  Month  Contract Deal #
  June 99  ENA 201 87426
  July 99  HPL 215 95072
  Aug 99  HPL 215 102775
  Sept 99  HPL 215 110502

 Meter 5192 Sarco Lateral

  No deal has ever been set up for meter 5192 for Duke Energy & Trading.
There is flow for May, July and Nov. 99.

Will you please let me know if you set up new deals for these meters?

Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 03:17
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
05/04/2000 12:08 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Aimee:

The Crow O'Connor, meter 6757 has its gas allocated to Strangers Gas for
April and May 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for their
money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter for
these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

In addition, the Sarco Lateral, meter 5192 has its gas allocated to Strangers
Gas for May and July 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for
their money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter
for these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

I would like to get this done ASAP since the customer is calling Settlements
and we start close next week.

Thanks,

Fred