Some friends of my wife and I are throwing a little bash on the evening of
September 9th for my upcoming baby BOY.   I would like to invite you all to
attend.  I believe there will be a margarita machine....

If you want to come,, please reply by sending me your address.  You will then
recieve an invitation by mail.

Hope to see you there,,

Mike


Maria and Drew, this is a long-winded e-mail but please bear with me...

The problem:

As you probably remember, several months ago several of us met to discuss the
following language in the ROFR portion of Transwestern's tariff: "if the rate
bid exceeds the maximum tariff rate, then the rate will be considered to be
the maximum tariff rate," and the additional frustrating language "[a]ll
available capacity shall be allocated under these procedures . . .."  At our
last meeting, we concluded that probably the best way to ensure that TW could
capture the true value of the capacity would be to link the negotiated rate
to index prices.  However, since this usually involves an unacceptable amount
of risk to both the shipper and TW, the marketers haven't done any
index-based rates and have no current plans to enter into any such deals.  I
have been asked by the Commercial Group to revisit this issue and to think of
other ways we could increase our ability to charge more than the maximum
rate.   Ideally they would like to eliminate the language I've quoted above.
However, my research has indicated that absent our 1) bringing about radical
change in the way FERC thinks about recourse rates or 2) showing that TW
lacks market power, we are probably stuck with this language.

Why the problem exists (you may already know):

Steve Stojic and I did some looking into why the language is in our tariff in
the first place.  In the Alternative Rates Policy Statement (RM95-6-000), the
Commission explained that it is willing to entertain individual requests for
negotiated rates, but only where customers retain the ability to choose a
cost-of-service based tariff rates.  "[T]he availability of a recourse
service would prevent pipelines from exercising market power by assuring that
the customer can fall back to cost-based, traditional service if the pipeline
unilaterally demands excessive prices or withholds service.  Thus, the
recourse rate mitigates market power."

The Commission went on to confirmed that under ROFR provisions the highest
rate that an existing shipper must match if it wishes to continue its
transportation arrangement is the maximum tariff rate. This policy is clearly
not limited to ROFR situations:  when capacity is constrained, a shipper
willing to pay only the recourse rate cannot lose access to capacity merely
because someone else is willing to pay a negotiated rate.  "When there are
more requests for capacity than there is capacity available, then the
pipeline must allocate capacity among those shippers willing to pay either
the negotiated rate or the maximum recourse rate, for example on a pro rata
basis if required by its tariff."  The example cited by the Commission:  If a
pipeline has 100 Dth/d available and two shippers request that capacity, one
who is willing to pay no more than the recourse rate of $5 and another a
negotiated rate of $6, then each would be allocated 50 Dth/d on a pro rata
basis (assuming the tariff provided for pro rata allocation and not some
other allocation method such as lottery).

When TW filed for authority to charge negotiated rates, it voluntarily added
the statement that "if the rate bid exceeds the maximum tariff rate, then the
rate will be considered to be the maximum tariff rate."  Presumably we had
concluded that we needed to add this recourse rate related provision in order
to receive negotiated rate authority.

Solutions??

I would like to know whether you concur that changing our tariff language
outright is probably out of the question.  I feel as if I've really been
chasing my tail here.  I have owed Lindy an answer for some time now.  But I
keep coming back to our having to prove lack of market power (which, Drew, is
where I believe you were headed when we talked about this in mid-October).
Steve Harris has asked whether we can just start small and remove the
recourse rate cap as to only a portion of our system.  I think we would still
have to show lack of market power in order to do this.  Do you agree?  Stojic
warns that proving lack of market power is a lengthy and expensive
proposition.  Might be worth it to us, though.

Another idea is to somehow provide shippers with an incentive to pay more
than max rate.  After all, we do have authority to charge negotiated rates.
We've seen one instance in which one of our marketers was able to get more
than max rates for IT space based on good customer relations alone.  However,
despite our wonderful relationships with most of our customers, it's unlikely
we can pull this off with any consistency.  We wondered whether we might be
able to get more than max rates in the context of an auction procedure.  But
I just am not convinced we could get around the Commission's requirement that
recourse rates be available.  That requirement has not changed.  Have either
of you seen anything to the contrary?

I would like to meet with you two, plus several others I have in mind, to
discuss this, preferably early this week (Tues. or Wed.), but would like to
discuss briefly with you first.  Please call me so we can talk for a few
minutes.  Thanks.


(See attached file: Retail Sales.pdf)(See attached file: PPI.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - Retail Sales.pdf
 - PPI.pdf


I've spoken with Rhonda about this, and I'll be letting the traders know to
be prepared for the change. This deal has been changed to Allegheny.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/20/2001 11:44 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 553645

Kate I spoke with Phil about this deal this morning and I just called but he
away at lunch.

Per our Rhonda, can you tell him that deal 553645 should be changed Allegheny
Energy Supply and that we should no longer do any deals under Merrill Lynch.
Also, can you let the schedulers know about the name change of this deal.

Thanks!


Mary,

your thoughts on how we define who is subject to this rule would be
appreciated.

Paul, FYI, there will be a call at 1 p.m PST with Briggs, Gannet, Wyden's
office, and Eachus re: information access legislation.

GAC
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/22/2001 03:12
PM ---------------------------

"Gannett, Craig" <CraigGannett@DWT.COM> on 03/22/2001 01:32:42 PM
To: "'Comnes, Alan'" <alan.comnes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Fwd[2]:electricity information legislation

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua_Sheinkman@wyden.senate.gov
[mailto:Joshua_Sheinkman@wyden.senate.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:39 AM
To: Gannett, Craig
Subject: Fwd[2]:electricity information legislation

Attached is the most current version of the legislation, which will be
included
in Senator Bingaman's bill that will be introduced this week.  However, if
there
are additional changes you think should be made, we can still incorporate
them
in a separate bill Senator Wyden intends to introduce in the near future.

____________________Forward Header_____________________
Subject:    information system
Author: Sam Fowler
Date:       03/19/2001 8:14 AM

    I incorporated the comments I got back from FERC last week, as well as
the
ones you forwarded to me, and put the revised version in the Democratic
energy
bill.

 - joshua- info system2.wpd


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020507.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'ECTHOU-BPS3'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Here it is!!  Have a great day!!  Stay warm.

Shea_Dugger@i2.com on 12/06/2000 01:38:30 PM
To: bcash@interwest.com, kenneth.lay@enron.com, romesh_wadhwani@i2.com,
sandy_tungare@vistaar.com, sanjiv_sidhu@i2.com, greg_brady@i2.com,
tom_meredith@dell.com, bill_beecher@i2.com, david_becker@i2.com,
robert_donohoo@i2.com
cc: Keith_Larney@i2.com, Doug_Linebarger@i2.com, Antonio_Boccalandro@i2.com,
Kevin_Smart@i2.com, Claudio_Osorio@i2.com, Ken_Belanger@i2.com,
Tim_Leisman@infinitecontent.com
Subject: Final Eagle BOD Presentation

From Keith Larney:

Please find attached the Board Presentation Package regarding the Eagle
transaction to be discussed at the meeting tomorrow.  Please do not
hesitate to call Keith at 469-357-4497 if you have any questions or
comments.  Thank you.
____________________

Shea Dugger
Legal Dept.
Tel: 469-357-4195
Fax: 469-357-6566
shea_dugger@i2.com
----- Forwarded by Shea Dugger/Dallas/US/i2Tech on 12/06/00 01:23 PM -----

(See attached file: Eagle BOD Presentation 12-07-00 v4-1.zip)

 - Eagle BOD Presentation 12-07-00 v4-1.zip


pls print TW and NN docs only--not Border.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/30/2000
05:38 PM ---------------------------

Julia White
03/30/2000 10:22 AM
To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kristen
Hand/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Mastio Survey

Attached below are the Mastio Survey presentations for TW, NNG and NBPL which
are to be reviewed with Stan and his direct reports on March 30. I want to
thank everyone for their time and effort in reviewing the findings and
recommendations for the Action Plans for each pipeline. The next steps will
be to make sure we focus on addressing the areas stated in the Actions Plans.

I also want to take the time to thank Tammy Lee-Jaquet for all her efforts in
pulling this information together for TW & NNG. In addition, Kirsten Hand was
instrumental in analyzing our information.  We could not have done this
project without them. GREAT JOB!!

This is only the first phase of this project which means we now have the task
to ensure we address the areas of the Action Plans. More to come!!

Thanks again everyone. Julia

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron on 03/30/2000
08:32 AM ---------------------------

03/30/2000 08:59 AM
Scott Coburn

To: rneppl@enron.com, bobhall01@sprynet.com, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Mastio Survey

Attached is Northern Border's Mastio presentation.

sc

	From:  Ricki Winters                           03/29/2000 07:02 PM

To: rneppl@enron.com, Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, bobhall01@sprynet.com,
Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White, Tammy
Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Mastio Survey

This is the latest version of the Mastio Presentation covering TW and NNG for
the meeting tomorrow (3/30) for Stan and his Direct Reports.

Thank you,
Ricki


Space-- Well said. I remember some of these people begging for mercy in The
Pit. They were not as cocky then as they are now.

#454 (I was always proud of being one number lower than Strap Anderson
indicating a marginally better GPA)

-----Original Message-----
From: hosman [mailto:hosman@eskridge.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:15 PM
To: smu-betas@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [smu-betas] 76ers - it's time to hump it

As a Beta from the distinguished class of 1973 and a Nebraskan living in
Oklahoma I would like to make a few comments about the letters below from
the distinguished Oklahoma weenie doctor  Bill Miller and sharp tongued very
popular Oklahoman transplanted author the one and only Jim Dent.
First -NEBRASKA did not get stomped.

Second -the great class of 1973 ,(Picture attached) who helped pledged you
arrogant sissies from the classes of 75 and 76, think it's time you get out
the Loving Cup and pass it around again.

Finally- neither Jim Dent or Bill Miller have invited any of the class of 73
who reside in Oklahoma over for -kai- (for Beek that's F&F). But we in the
class of 73 are not bitter even though a visit the beautiful and prestigious
Nichols Hills (Oklahoma's answer to Highland Park) would boost our spirits
in these times.  Anyway I hope I speak for the silent  E-Wooglin.com members
when I say  I'm glad I didn't buy any of that ENRON stock.
Oh and by the way no one need respond to this note as I remain
affectionately yours,  Tom Hosman (that's Space for Beek and #456 for  those
of you who are still counting).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Dent" <jdent@mmcable.com>
To: <smu-betas@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [smu-betas] 76ers - it's time to hump it

> Hey Bill Miller:
>
> You stupid asshole. Doug Dyer was not in our class. I will admit that Mule
> Benson showed some guts in standing up for your wimp class. You obviously
> don't have the guts. You live two blocks from me and never even had the
> grace to say hello. So stick it, brother. Wish I could take you back to
the
> dorg.
>
> Dent
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <camdenway@aol.com>
> To: <smu-betas@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [smu-betas] 76ers - it's time to hump it
>
>
> > Brother Benson,     Congratulations on taking over the top spot in the
> > Best-of-ewooglin.com-contest.   Those pathetic losers of '75 have been
> > shoving our faces in it for too long.  After all, whose class was Doug
> Dyer
> > in after all?  Sorry I can't come to D this w/e.  Got to go to parents
> > weekend for my college freshman.  Don't forget to tune in to the Sooners
> > stomping Nebraska.
> >
> > -kai-
> > B Miller
> >
> > At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay
> connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's
> incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick
it
> up right where they left off years ago.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay
connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's
incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it
up right where they left off years ago.
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay
connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's
incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it
up right where they left off years ago.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/Vk9qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Monica - Vacation

Date:		10/5/2000
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Frank,

We'd like to go ahead and book the Rockies trade from 11/15/00.

To reconfirm:

ENE Sells 1/2 Contract per day to Tudor for NWPL Rockies Basis
Term:  Apr 01 - Oct 01
Price:  -61.5 cents per MMBTU

Thanks, Vikas


Have we flowed any IT transport on the East Desk pipelines for the month of January?  I think the answer is no but I wanted to double check?  If we did, then I need to know the pipeline, contract number and probably the volume.

Thanks.


UK: Electric fault blamed for UK Teesside blast - HSE.
Reuters English News Service, 08/10/01
UK: UK power prices ease, focus still on Teesside.
Reuters English News Service, 08/10/01
UK Power Market: Spot Up On Outages
Dow Jones Energy Service, 08/10/01
INDIA: INTERVIEW-Time running out to solve Indian row, Enron warns.
Reuters English News Service, 08/10/01

UK: Electric fault blamed for UK Teesside blast - HSE.

08/10/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - A electrical fault in a transformer probably caused an explosion and fire on Wednesday at the Teesside power station in northern England which killed three people, said British safety authorities on Friday.
"The evidence points to an electrical short (circuit) leading to an explosion and fire in the transformer," a spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) told Reuters.
The explosion on Wednesday afternoon killed three employees of the station owner, U.S. utility Enron , and a fourth remains in hospital with burns.
The HSE is investigating the incident with the police who are looking to see if there is evidence to support manslaughter proceedings against Enron, said the spokesman.
The spokesman said there was maintenance work going on at the plant when the blast occurred but it was unclear if it involved the transformer.
The 1,875 megawatt gas-fired power station was closed immediately after the explosion and Enron said on Thursday no decision on future operations would be taken for several days.
"On-site activity may increase over the next few days as teams begin the process of assessing the damage," said Enron in a statement.
Enron added the HSE may take weeks to complete their investigations.
The HSE said Enron had been prosecuted twice for incidents at the plant which was built in 1992 and is part of an industrial complex in the Grangetown district of Middlesbrough.
The company was fined 10,000 pounds in 1998 after an explosion in 1996 in which a worker suffered severe burns.
It was fined 17,000 pounds for an accident in 1992 when a construction worker was hit by a vehicle.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: UK power prices ease, focus still on Teesside.

08/10/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - British electricity prices ended slightly weaker on Friday in quiet trade which concentrated on the winter 01 and summer 02 baseload contracts.
"Winter baseload opened slightly weaker and fell to a low of 20.84 pounds per megawatt hour, although in very lacklustre trade," said one trader.
He added the contract firmer later to around 20.88 pounds, although this was a drop of about 10 pence from Thursday's closing levels.
Summer 02 baseload also weakened slightly, ending the day down about 10 pence at 17.77/17.85 pounds.
In the prompt market, day ahead baseload slipped to 16.50 pounds to reflect the usual drop in demand at the weekend.
Traders said the market was waiting for news of the restart of Enron's Teesside power station which closed on Wednsday after an explosion in which three workers died.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) told Reuters the blast was probably caused by an electrical short circuit in the power station's transformer.
The HSE investigation into the explosion is expected to take weeks to complete, meanwhile Enron said no decision on future operations at the plant will take place for several days.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK Power Market: Spot Up On Outages

08/10/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- U.K. spot prices were up Friday on outages, including the outage at Enron's 1,875-megawatt plant at Teesside, traders said.
Day-ahead, Saturday, base load traded at GBP17.25-GBP17.60 a megawatt-hour, up from Thursday's late trading at GBP17.45/MWh.
Saturday blocks 1 and 2 traded at GBP11.60/MWh, and Sunday blocks 1 and 2 traded at GBP10.60/MWh.
Blocks 1 and 2 for the weekend traded at GBP12 - GBP12.25/MWh.
The weekend traded at GBP16.50 - 17.17/MWh up substantially from Thursday's prices for this contract at GBP16.20/MWh.
Weekend peaks traded at GBP20.50/MWh, up on the back of higher base-load prices for the weekend, a trader said.
"We really didn't expect to see the weekend trade so high because the grid data looks like there is a good margin," said a trader.
"Probably some of the high prices were from Enron, but I don't think that it was all Enron, because I think that some other plants are on outage," he added.
Week 33 base load was at a bid-offer spread of GBP17 - GBP17.50/MWh, late in the day, in line with Thursday's trading price of GBP17.25/MWh.
Week 33 peaks traded at GBP22.50 - GBP22.75/MWh, up GBP0.15 - GBP0.90 from prices for this contract Thursday.
"Enron was buying heaps of week 33 and is now backing off," said a trader.
Traders didn't report trades of weeks 34 and 35.
September base load traded at GBP18.11-18.15/MWh, and was quoted late in the day at a bid-offer spread of GBP18.16 - GBP18.17/MWh.
From July 30 to Aug. 8, when Teesside went offline, prices for Septemeber base load have traded at GBP18.10 - GBP18.29. Prices since the incident have been at GBP18.05 - 18.19/MWh, indicating minimal reaction.
From Aug. 1 to Aug. 8, when Teesside went offline, Week 33 was traded at GBP16.30-GBP16.90/MWh. Since Aug. 8, prices for Week 33 have consistently been over GBP17/MWh, indicating a significant reaction.
The Meteorological Office expects Saturday's temperatures to be within 1-2 degrees Celsius of Friday's.
Early next week the forecast predicts temperatures will decline to below historical norms, by as much as 4 degrees Celsius in some regions.
The Balancing Mechanism Reporting System said demand will peak Saturday at 31,920 MW, with a trough of 22,301 MW. Demand peaked Friday at 36,163 MW.
The following forward contracts traded Wednesday. Figures are in GBP/MWh: Aug 10 Aug 9
Sept. Base 18.11 - 18.15 18.05 - 18.19
Winter 01 Base 20.84 - 20.95 20.94 - 21.08
Winter 01 Peaks 27.85 - 27.90 27.80 - 27.85
Summer 02 Base 17.79 - 17.82 17.84 - 17.85
Winter 02 Base 20.80 - 20.85 20.95 - 21.00

-By Sarah Spikes, Dow Jones Newswires; +44-20-7842-9345; sarah.spikes@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: INTERVIEW-Time running out to solve Indian row, Enron warns.
By Sriram Ramakrishnan

08/10/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

BOMBAY, Aug 10 (Reuters) - U.S. energy giant Enron Corp warned on Friday that time was running out for reaching an amicable solution to a long-running, bitter dispute between its Indian unit and a local power utility.
The Houston-based company said it could terminate its contract with the Indian utility after the federal government rejected its latest proposal to buy out Enron's stake in its subsidiary at cost price.
"The clock is continuing to tick down on the deadline," K. Wade Cline, chief operating officer of Enron India Pvt Ltd, told Reuters in an interview. "Terminating the contract is not inevitable, but it is a possibility if no solution is found."
Cline said Enron has not heard from the government directly, but India's junior power minister rejected the proposal in parliament on Thursday.
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board, a state-run provincial power utility and Enron's Dabhol Power Corporation are locked in an acrimonious row over the terms under which they agreed to buy and sell power.
The cash-strapped Indian utility now claims it does not need all the power that Dabhol wants to supply. It says the power is too expensive anyway, while Enron's subsidiary says the Board is reneging on its contractual obligations.
In May, Dabhol stopped supplying power to the Board from its 2,184 MW gas-based power plant on the west coast of India after the utility defaulted on payments.
Dabhol then served the utility a preliminary termination notice, but this still gives the two feuding sides until November to solve the issue through negotiation. After this, DPC is free to terminate the contract.
WASTED INVESTMENT
If Enron terminates the contract, then the $2.9 billion power project is in danger of going down the drain.
This now seems closer to reality after the Indian government rejected Enron's suggestion that it buy Enron's 65 percent stake in Dabhol at cost price.
The U.S.-based diversified company General Electric Co and construction group Bechtel each hold 10 percent in Dabhol Power Company, while the provincial utility owns the remaining 15 percent. The total equity investment is worth $900 million-1.0 billion.
"We have given an option to the governemnt to solve the issue in a non-contentious way and without the need for a final termination notice," Cline said.
Enron said it is looking to recover only the cost from its Indian venture and is willing to forego any profits.
"No profits, no return on our investment, just our cost and not a penny more," Cline said, but declined to divulge the exact value Enron expects for the proposed stake sale.
"We have mentioned the figure in the letter to the government but we are not talking about it," he said.
He said the dispute needs to be resolved quickly. "It is having a big negative impact on perceptions of India among investors," he said.
ROOT PROBLEM
At the heart of the controversy between Dabhol and the Indian power utility is the power tariff, which varies depending on how much power the utility draws down.
Cline said Enron is trying hard to solve the issue, with proposals like agreeing to reduce its tariff to 3.50 rupees per unit. At some levels of usage, the tariff can be as high as 7.0 rupees per unit.
He said there is a huge misconception about Dabhol's tariffs, which are on par with most new generation power plants including those of the state-owned National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC).
"NTPC's new generation plants are producing at more or less similar rates. They are not being asked to reduce their tariffs. why are we being asked to do so?"
Enron's offered to lower its tariffs and sell the surplus power that the state utility felt it didn't need to buyers in other states. But the buyers, all state-owned utilities, said the tariff was still not low enough and could pay nothing more than than 2.50 rupees per unit.
When asked if Enron would consider a further reduction, Kline said: "If there is a proposal, we will evaluate it. But my question is who will take the hit. We cannot decide on this issue alone. We will have to sit with lenders, shipowners, construction contractors to decide."
"We took a hit on our returns, the lenders took a hit on theirs, the ship owners and the suppliers of liquefied natural gas (LNG) also took a hit through this proposal. We had no incentive to do this. We have done nothing wrong." ($1=47.11 Indian rupees).

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


WHAT IS THE CROSS STREET ON RICHMOND??


Diane,

Thanks

Vince


All,

OK, we need to move ahead with the ERisk MOU and NDA.  We will be meeting
with ERisk December 12th and these documents will need to be executed for us
to have that meeting.  Per the series of emails below I believe we agreed
with most of the following actions:

1)  David and Tana will pull together the NDA and email it to ERisk for
comments by 12/1/00.  The provisions of the NDA needs to be congruent with
Section F of the MOU.

2)  ERisk will return the comments by 12/4/00.

3)  David and Tana will finalize the NDA and submit to Leslie for approval by
12/5/00.

4)  Leslie will review and approve the NDA, initial and return to David Dupre
by 12/5/00.

5)  David will fax and email the NDA to Richard by 12/5/00.

6)  Richard will co-ordinate with Denis to sign both the NDA and MOU by
12/7/00.

7)  Richard will FedEx the NDA to ERisk in New York by 12/7/00

8)  David will follow-up with ERisk  to assure that the documents are signed
before December 12th.

Please let David know if you will not be able to make the time lines so we
can make other arrangements.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Craig

Leslie Hansen
12/01/2000 11:59 AM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Erisk MOU and NDA

David:

As we discussed, this CP is expecting to receive a revised NDA to replace the
form we previously sent to them.  Accordingly, I will have Tana prepare a new
form of NDA, which I will modify a bit to incorporate their proposed
revisions to the previous draft to the extent they are acceptable, and send a
revised draft to the counterparty.

With regard to the MOU, I have left Dennis a voice mail explaining that I do
not feel comfortable picking up an MOU in the middle of negotiations.  I do
not agree that it needs to be the same lawyer drafting the MOU and the NDA
and intend to discuss this issue with him.

I have briefly discussed the general issue of our involvement in the
representation of EnronCredit.com with Mark Taylor and will follow up with
some more helpful guidelines next week.  In the meantime, I'll work on the
ERisk NDA.

Regards,

Leslie

	David P Dupre
	12/01/2000 10:39 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Erisk MOU and NDA

Tana asked me to give you this NDA draft document which we forwarded to Erisk
yesterday morning followed
by their comments which you have a copy of.

Thanks
David 3-3528

Leslie Hansen
12/01/2000 09:32 AM
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis
O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Erisk MOU and NDA

I will negotiate the NDA for David's group.  The counterparty had several
comments to the NDA that David sent out yesterday, so I will need to respond
to those in order to finalize the document.

Denis has drafted the MOU, and I will leave it to him to finalize that
document after he has addressed any issues raised by the counterparty with
regard to the MOU.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen

	Richard Sage
	12/01/2000 05:38 AM

		 To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Erisk MOU and NDA

David,
Denis told me yesterday that the same lawyer needs to do NDA and MOU (the NDA
is an extension of the MOU) and that Leslie was looking at the NDA so should
do the MOU as well.
I suggest that you give Denis a call to clarify.
Leslie should mail Denis (and copy me) with the final documents saying they
are OK, Denis will initial them, and I will get them signed and send them
wherever they are required.

I'll publish a general procedures guide later so everything works smoothly
going forward!

Regards,
Richard

David P Dupre
01/12/2000 02:22
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Erisk MOU and NDA

How is this going?

There is an appendix A under Section E of the MOU which is
a non-disclosure agreement.

We are working on this NDA with Tana Jones of ENA Legal.

Cheers,
David


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Yoder, Christian; Hall, Steve C.; Swerzbin, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.; Belden, Tim; Dasovich, Jeff; Gaskill, Chris; Grigsby, Mike; Heizenrader, Timothy; Kaminski, Vince J; Kean, Steven; Milnthorp, Rob; Presto, Kevin M.; Ribeiro, Claudio; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Tawney, Mark; Tholan, Scott; Whitman, Britt; Will, Lloyd; Comnes, Alan; Herndon, Rogers; Lewis, James; Black, Don; Johnston, Robert
Subject:	California Update 6/08/01

CPUC Delays QF Payment Vote
Sources believe that the delay in the PUC vote on paying the QFs 15% of  their undercollected debt is likely a result from both a concern about bankruptcy issues raised by issuing what could be seen as a "preference payment" to the QFs (the PUC does follow these issues out of necessity, given the current environment) and a lack of clarity regarding how to implement the 15% payment.  The delay was unsurprising and characteristic of how the PUC operates.  It is also noted that there are many claims on SoCal's and PG&E's cash flows currently.  Additionally, agreeing to pay 15% of debts to the QFs raises legal issues, in that the utilities would be paying debts to some creditors, but not others.  This could increase the likelihood of an involuntary bankruptcy filing against SoCal by the non-QF creditors.


[IMAGE]   As  a special thank you for being a valued WeatherBug member,  you are invited to select FREE gifts  from leading manufacturers including Samsonite
, Amity
,  Jaguar
 and more. You pay only a small charge for each item,  which covers it all including shipping & handling. Quantities  are limited so hurry! The gift is  absolutely free for you to keep. Why pay retail prices of up to  $59.95 per item in a retail store  when WeatherBug, in conjunction with ThankUGift.com, is making  it available to you for FREE?       Freshwater Pearl Earrings   [IMAGE]     Freshwater  Pearl Earrings  Retail Value: $ 39.95 FREE!   "Collected from oriental pearl beds, designed and crafted  by a family of artisans, these will add a splendid finishing  touch to whatever you wear, day or evening. Solitary cultured  pearls placed securely on silver-alloy posts. Elegant. Intriguing.     Generation Power Shaver    [IMAGE]     Generation  Power Shaver  Retail Value: $ 49.95  FREE!   "This rechargeable, triple-headed electric razor makes short  work of the trickiest beard. A well engineered instrument  that anticipates different angles of growth and variables  in texture to groom closely and comfortably. High strength,  stainless steel cutter bits, with six blades per head.      Navigator Torch    [IMAGE]         Navigator Torch  Retail Value: $ 24.95  FREE!   "A swirl of metal to hold in your hand and guide your way  with fire, light, and compass. Sound incredible? Take a  look. The coiled filament under the cap flares with incendiary  splendor when ignited, while a red bulb near the base glows  cheerily.      Hands Free Cell Phone Headset    [IMAGE]      Hands Free Cell Phone Headset  Retail Value: $ 29.95  FREE!   "Why wait for legislators to implement the inevitable? It's  just plain common sense to get a headset and keep your hands  free to properly handle your vehicle! The device is automatically  compatible with most phones that take a 2.5 millimeter jack.        Spy Multi Tool With Light Beam   [IMAGE]      Spy Multi Tool With Light  Beam  Retail Value: $ 29.95  FREE!   "An incredible tool that lights its  own way to tackle tough jobs. A magnetic tip, telescoping  capacity, and multiple bits are among its many features.  You'll want to get several of these to keep handy for spur-of-the-moment  repairs.      Freshwater Pearl Necklace   [IMAGE]        Freshwater  Pearl Necklace  Retail Value: $ 49.95  FREE!   "Such lovely gifts from nature, plucked from watery depths  to adorn the slope of her neck. How beautifully this solitary  strand modifies, but never overpowers. The pearls glow softly  - but she glistens! Memories are made of this.     Super Bright LED Light   [IMAGE]      Super Bright LED Light   Retail Value: $ 24.95  FREE!   "Intensity. Convenience. Longevity.  Words that sure fit THIS hot little item! A beam powerful  enough to be seen a mile away. A casing smaller than your  car keys. And a bulb that'll put everything else to  shame! (10,000 + hours!)      Cell Phone Antenna Booster     [IMAGE]       Cell Phone Antenna Booster  Retail Value: $ 24.95  FREE!   "Cell phones and pagers follow us everywhere. But sometimes  the transmissions can fade when we pass through tunnels or  certain buildings. Moments of lost communication and frustration  can be a thing of the past with this remarkable antenna booster.

To unsubscribe from  this mailing list, click HERE .  Emails requesting removal will not be processed.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 10:48 AM -----

	"Bill St. Clair" <billstclair@msn.com>
	05/31/2001 10:35 AM

		 To: "Betty Troy" <N999GT@aol.com>, "Carol St. Clair"
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, "Gene Renz" <renzassoc@earthlink.net>, "Lynne
Smith" <elinorls@home.com>, "Suzanne Caver" <scaver3322@aol.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arthur's Tennis Pictures

Pictures from Arthur's last tournament are now on the web.? The adress is
www.rookieleaguephoto.com then click on Select Sport, then Tennis, then
Kingwood CC Match 1.
?
Bill

?


FYI.  CPUC accept our deal on information related to the subpoena?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/12/2000 03:08 PM -----

	<Steven_T_Sweet@calpx.com>
	10/12/2000 02:15 PM

		 To: Market_Participant_AB1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_CD2@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_EG1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_HJ1@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_KL2@calpx.com, Market_Participant_MN1@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_OR1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_OR2@calpx.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: State Audit Notice

     Please respond no later than Tuesday, October      17, 2000 by 05:00 PM.

     Thank you.

(See attached file: Ltr to Participants re.Confid.10-12-00.doc)   (See
attached
file: Ltr from State Audit CLC 10-11-00.doc)

 - Ltr to Participants re.Confid.10-12-00.doc
 - Ltr from State Audit CLC 10-11-00.doc


Thanks - that's what I was hoping it was. Heading in to see Moodys. Thanks again for your help.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Donoho, Lindy <Lindy.Donoho@ENRON.com>
To: Howard, Kevin A. <Kevin.Howard@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Mar 05 14:01:02 2002
Subject: RE: Power gen mkts slide

It is my understanding (from Kevin Hyatt) that its like Arizona's PUC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Donoho, Lindy
Subject: Power gen mkts slide

Pie chart slide for AZ,NM, and NEV shows the source of info to be thr "Arizona Corporation Commission". Who is this?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Please fined attached translation of articles from Denryoku Business
Sokuhou dated March 7
and the March edition of Energy Forum.

Best regards,
IRJ PR Services

 - Denryoku Business Sokuhou.doc
 - Energy Forum.doc


In response to yesterday's staff meeting, please plan to attend a meeting
next Wednesday August 9th, from 2:00 - 6:00 pm in Conference Room 21c2.  As
Brenda lined out yesterday, the goal of the meeting is to reassess the
organizational structure.  Be prepared to offer positive helpful suggestions,
comments and ideas.

If you have any questions, please call.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jean Mrha/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 12:01 PM ---------------------------

Linda Roberts
03/21/2001 11:37 AM
To:	Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryant/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:

Subject:	Enron Producer One

---------------------- Forwarded by Linda Roberts/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 11:23 AM ---------------------------

"Bullion, Lew" <bullionl@gulfpub.com> on 03/21/2001 10:21:48 AM
To:	linda.roberts@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	Enron Producer One

Linda
It was a pleasure to meet you yesterday at Enron Field and to learn more
about Enron Producer One. Looks like you have a winner. I define that as
solving a producer's problem before, sometimes, the producer knows the
magnitude of the problem.

please keep us in mind when you have case study success stories involving
pipe line and gathering systems and measurement issues.

Again, all the best to you. If I can help further, please holler.

Lew Bullion
Senior Editor
PIPE LINE & GAS INDUSTRY magazine
3301 Allen Pkwy, Houston, Texas 77019 U.S.A.
713-529-4301, fax 713-520-4433
BullionL@GULFPUB.COM

c: George O. Ives, Jr.,  Publisher


Lavonne and I  visited with Mom Sunday afternoon.  We cooked outside and had
a great time.  Mom said that she might want to fix noodle soup on Mothers
Day.  That would be great.  We can supplement with sausage or hamburgers on
the grill.  What do you think.  Mom's memory appears to be good about many
things, and then some things just don't seem to register.  She seemed
confused about whether Bettye had been their for Easter.  Is this normal,
what type of medication is the doctor having her take to combat the loss of
memory?  Maybe we can all get together Mothers Day and visit.  Email me back
please.


David: I thank you. You cannot imagine how appreciated this is. The changes
come so fast at Enron that unless you are associated with the organization
concerned, it's impossible to get timely information into the hands of those
in positions of responsibility. Joe


POI 500168 has been changed in CAS to 200,000 both receipt and delivery.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brostad, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth; Buchanan, John; Cormier, Martha; Draemer, Mary ; Frazier, Perry; Hernandez, Bert; Hyatt, Kevin; Kowalke, Terry; Lee, Dennis; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Macpherson, Sigrid; McEvoy, Christine; Mercaldo, Vernon; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ramsaran, Gale; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Studebaker, James ; Trevino, Linda; Vignaroli, Donald; Ward, Linda
Cc:	Floyd, Jodie
Subject:	FW: Change for Oneok Interconnect( Oneok Ward County)

Please note that the original POI 500168 is active/valid in PLE and available to nominate as a receipt or delivery. The new point we set up for the Interconnect (78161) has been inactivated, and will not be valid for transport.

If you have questions, please advise.

Karen Brostad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brostad, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Macpherson, Sigrid
Cc:	Panzer, Robin
Subject:	RE: Change for Oneok Interconnect( Oneok Ward County)

Yes, the volumes for the two physical meters should be summed and passed to POI 500168 as a net number, just like NNG does on their sum meters.

Karen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Macpherson, Sigrid
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Brostad, Karen
Cc:	Panzer, Robin
Subject:	RE: Change for Oneok Interconnect( Oneok Ward County)

The SUM # for these two stations will be 0047109-00. Will this be used for both delivery and receipt? Sig

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brostad, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, 08 29, 2001 08:14
To:	Brown, Elizabeth; Buchanan, John; Cormier, Martha; Draemer, Mary ; Frazier, Perry; Hernandez, Bert; Hyatt, Kevin; Kowalke, Terry; Lee, Dennis; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Macpherson, Sigrid; McEvoy, Christine; Mercaldo, Vernon; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ramsaran, Gale; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Studebaker, James ; Trevino, Linda; Vignaroli, Donald; Ward, Linda
Subject:	Change for Oneok Interconnect( Oneok Ward County)
Importance:	High

It has been proposed by Marketing that the new interconnect (TW/Oneok Ward County - POI 78161) be not used for nominations, but would be removed from our PLE system and that the old POI 500168 be set up as a bi-directional point for nomination purposes to accept both receipts and deliveries at that point.

All flow through physical meter #10187 (new TW/Oneok Ward County POI 78161) and meter #9089 (Existing TW/Oneok(Westar) Ward County POI 500168) will need to be summed and a new sum meter established for POI 500168.

Kevin:  Does this affect your interconnect agreement in any way?

Sigrid, can you please set up the sum meter and let me know what it is.

This change is to be in effect no later than Friday in order to be ready for September business.

If anyone has questions or concerns, please advise.

Karen Brostad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:30 AM
To:	Brostad, Karen
Cc:	Frazier, Perry; Lokay, Michelle; Hyatt, Kevin; Ratliff, Dale
Subject:	One Oak Ward County

Can we use a summation meter for the POI 500168 Westar Ward County Meter # 9089 and Meter # 10187
We can make this a bi-directional point in our system.  This will make it transparent to our customers.

Thanks DS


The entire book is being sent to you via a separate e-mail.  This is the
two-page spread that highlights "making markets".

Marge
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron on 03/14/2001
05:18 PM ---------------------------
MARGE NADASKY @
ECT
03/09/2001 06:45 PM

To: Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Volatile markets spread

---------------------- Forwarded by Marge Nadasky/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 06:45
PM ---------------------------

"Monica Zalta" <Monica.Zalta@darcyww.com> on 03/09/2001 06:38:52 PM
To: <marge.nadasky@enron.com>
cc: <jmandelker@aol.com>

Subject: Volatile markets spread

Voila.

 - Page 6-7.pdf


Gerald:  ECT (ENA) has an agreement with TransEnergie in Montreal re
Potential business arrangement involving Eastern US power transmission
facilities specifically those located within the NPCC, MAAC, ECAR, SERC, and
RRC North American Electric Reliability Council Regions.

2/99 - 2/2001.  It is bilateral and contains no restrictive provisions.  Let
me know if you would like to see it.
Kay

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
EB 3833
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-6794
kay.young@enron.com

	Gerald Nemec
	07/20/2000 02:10 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA Data Sheet

Kay,  Please see attached.  Thanks.


You blew me off!  Are you in town?  I tried your phone but it's busy.  df


I would like to take the 16th throught  the 26th of November.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


fyi, action
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
10:16 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/22/2001 01:42 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Spring Business Meeting

Dave --

Sorry for the delay in responding.  Dorie has been out after surgery and I
wanted to talk with her first.  Attendance is an issue that can be addressed
via a few initiatives, including:

1) better up-front communication from the Office of the Chair through the
direct supervisors (like we did for United Way last year)
2) entertainment/big-name draw added to the line-up
3) IP-TV as a back-up for those who cannot attend
4) select a better time than last year's meeting (i.e., morning meetings have
been better attended in the past vs. last year's afternoon meeting)

There are no doubt other small changes we can make to enhance attendance, but
this should get us headed in the right direction.  Dorie and I would be happy
to sit down and discuss this with you.

Regardless of what we do to increase attendance, if we wish to do such a
meeting, we need to pick a date and get on the Hyatt calendar soon.  Their
calendar is filling up quickly.  Thanks.

Eric

David W Delainey@ECT
01/16/2001 10:18 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Guys, given all the change and our 2000 success, I would argue that we should
have a meeting; however, the challenge is getting people to show up - any
thoughts on this Eric/Dorie?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
10:21 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/10/2001 01:50 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Dave and John --

In the past, ENA has held an all-employee business meeting over at the Hyatt
in April or May.  Do you plan to hold such a meeting?  If so, we need to get
started on planning the event.  Dorie Hitchcock has typically handled the
arrangements.  Please advise.

Eric


-----Original Message-----
From: Joor, William E., III
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:28 AM
To: Dilg, Joe
Subject: FW: NoCal March 20 Draft - LPG Distribution

William E. Joor III
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3600 First City Tower
1001 Fannin
Houston, Texas  77002-6760
Tel:  713-758-2582
Fax:  713-615-5201
wjoor@velaw.com

 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 The information in this email may be confidential and/or
privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual
or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an
authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its
attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the
sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Linn Miller [mailto:Michael.Linn.Miller@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 6:43 PM
To: J Mark Metts; Taylor, Mitchell (Enron); Amit Walia; Ceci Torn;
fstable@ei.enron.com; Sayre, C. Frank (Enron); fleite@enron.com; Lewis,
Jim C. (Enron); Young, Randy (Enron); Christodoulou, Diomendes (Enron)
Cc: Joor, William E., III; Alastair.maxwell@msdw.com;
Martin.arias@msdw.com; ramzi.nassar@msdw.com
Subject: NoCal March 20 Draft - LPG Distribution

As previously discussed.

MLM
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Linn Miller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/20/2000 06:47 PM ---------------------------

Ramzi.Nassar@msdw.com on 03/20/2000 03:28:03 PM

To:   michael.l.miller@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  NoCal March 20 Draft - LPG Distribution

(See attached file: #143899 v1 - LPG Dist (Ventane).doc)(See attached file:
#143901 v1 - LPG Dist (IGL).doc)(See attached file: #143892 v1 - LPG Distr
(PR).doc)

(See attached file: #143899 v1 - LPG Dist (Ventane).doc)
(See attached file: #143901 v1 - LPG Dist (IGL).doc)
(See attached file: #143892 v1 - LPG Distr (PR).doc)

 - #143899 v1 - LPG Dist (Ventane).doc
 - #143901 v1 - LPG Dist (IGL).doc
 - #143892 v1 - LPG Distr (PR).doc


Thank you Sara. I am awaiting response from both counterparties.

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	02/15/2001 12:37 AM

		 To: Darren Delage/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Goldman Sachs/UBS Warburg

Darren:

(1)  Goldman Sachs
ENA  executed the Client Access Agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co.  on June
15, 2000.  Since you are trading in the name of ENA, you should not need to
execute an additional agreement.  I confirmed this with Ted Leh this
morning.  At Ted's suggestion, please forward to me the fax number and email
address of the Goldman person requesting that you execute further
documentation.  I can fax to him a copy of the agreement and correspond by
email.  I will also copy Ted Leh and Vivian Siao (keeps track of agreements
and authorized traders) so that everyone is up to date.

(2)  UBS Warburg
I spoke with Sheryl Gallant.  ENA and other Enron affiliates are already
trading on the UBS electronic websites for OTC transactions.  Interestingly
enough, UBS does not require an electronic trading agreement to be signed by
a customer for online trading.  In other words, ENA has an executed ISDA with
UBS dated May 31, 1993, you are an authorized trader for ENA and UBS is happy
to let you access their platform. Sheryl does not know why Jun Ishi requested
execution of a "Client User List" (i.e., an authorized trader list) and said
to forget it.  If you would like for me to speak to Jun Ishi or correspond
with him (please send his email address), just let me know.

Please let me hear from you if you would like for me to pursue further.  As a
representative of ENA, you will probably have most agreements already in
place.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
05:26 AM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel
05/01/2001 12:24 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2- SURVEY - PHILLIP ALLEN

-
Full Name:        Phillip Allen

Login ID:   pallen

Extension:  3-7041

Office Location:  EB3210C

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Both

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  IPAQ

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  YES
    If yes, who?  INA RANGEL

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
    If yes, who?  NO

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
    If yes, who?  NO

Do you have access to a shared calendar?
    If yes, which shared calendar?  YES, West Calendar

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?
    If yes, please list here:  NO

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  NONE

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:     7:00 AM To:      5:00 PM

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? NO
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000
08:36 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 06/21/2000 06:20:13 PM
To: "Sheri Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Rochelle Smith"
<rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Raymond Paterson" <ray_paterson@hotmail.com>,
"Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>, "Lori Horrocks" <loroks@yahoo.com>, "Jim
Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Jim Henness \(E-mail\)" <jhennes@c2i2.com>,
"Janine Gregor" <janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>,
"Darron Giron" <dgiron@enron.com>, "Dan Kerr" <ditchdog81@hotmail.com>, "Ben
Schulein" <bschulein@hotmail.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Can I Finish?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "Jim Henness (E-mail)" <jhennes@c2i2.com>; "Jim Joseph (E-mail)"
<jcjoseph@wt.net>; "Jim McClatchie (E-mail)" <jimmac@flash.net>; "Jon Warren
(E-mail)" <jhwarren@ruf.rice.edu>; "Rella Snetsinger (E-mail)"
<rella13@zebra.net>; "Robert Kile (E-mail)" <rkile@aol.com>; "Rochelle Smith
(E-mail)" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>; "Roland Schilder (E-mail)"
<Schilder_r@hotmail.com>; "Todd Kelly (E-mail)" <mtoddkelly@yahoo.com>;
"Trey Bergman (E-mail)" <treybergman@ghg.net>; "Ugly Boo (E-mail)"
<hollyw@email.msn.com>; "Greg Holles (E-mail)" <GregHolles@aol.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:41 PM
Subject: FW: Can I Finish?

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wanda Harding [mailto:wharding@redsky.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 2:48 PM
> To: Alan Birchenough (E-mail); Alisa Mayfield Conboy (E-mail); Barry
Harding
> (E-mail); Brian Mann (E-mail); Dave Pitschel (E-mail); Hazel Birchenough
> (E-mail); Heather Sullivan (E-mail); Ignacio Martinez (E-mail); Jeff
Bishop
> (E-mail); Jeff Draper (E-mail); Jennifer Vodvarka (E-mail); Jim Terando
> (E-mail); Lori Stull (E-mail); Pegi Newhouse (E-mail); Rick Pleczko
> (E-mail); Warren, Stacy; Wes Manning (E-mail); Jeff Harris
> Subject: FW: Can I Finish
>
>
>
>
>

 - Let_me_finish_my_beer.jpg


Shelley,
Here is a revised plan that uses the whole year to distribute costs into the future per our last conversation.


Your eRequest's password is 4311
To use this password, go to the eRequest website and click on non-Corp logon.
Put in your email address and the password above and click Log In, and you
will log into eRequest.


Linda Trevino has openings in the CMS training classes today at 1:30 and again at 3:00 if you have not signed up I recommend getting trained in the new system.

John Buchanan


[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
Dear  SmartReminders Member,

 			[IMAGE]
 			[IMAGE]

 	[IMAGE] 		Save  at Orvis!  Orvis - Since 1856.  Providing distinctive clothing, gear, luggage & home goods inspired  by our Sporting Traditions. America's oldest mail order company offering  the best guarantee in the business.

 	[IMAGE] 		Save  $20 at J. Jill!  Save $20, J. Jill's Special Gift to You For a limited time, save $20 on  your order of $150 or more when you shop jjill.com. This special offer is  good for J. Jill's newest holiday items as well as our best of season sale  items. Shop now for the best selection. Expires November 30, 2001.

 	[IMAGE]   		 Free  Shipping at Johnston & Murphy!  Get Free Shipping from  Johnston & Murphy! Johnston & Murphy is the ultimate resource for all types of men's  footwear including classic, contemporary, and casual styles. Complete  your wardrobe with fashionable men's apparel and accessories that  define style.

We respect  your privacy and are a Certified Participant of the BBBOnLine
 Privacy Program.  To be removed from future offers,click  here.
SmartReminders.com  is a permission based service. To unsubscribe click  here .


Please forward to North American group:

              I'd encourage everyone in the group to leave early today, if you so desire,  in order to more fully enjoy celebrating Halloween with families and friends. Thanks also  for your continued support and dedication during these difficult times - It is noticed and much appreciated.  Enjoy Halloween!


According to the contract the pricing of the gas we are selling back to
Cannon is a WACOG of what we bought it for this summer.  Here is the
calculation of the WACOG.  Let me know if there are any questions/comments.

Dave


Jay,  My fax number is (618) 229-0229

Put a coversheet on it or something that has my name on it.
Thanks Dad

PS Think hard about anything you want us to bring since we will have the
truck.  We probably won't bring the truck very many times.


Kent,

Are you sending this (and the opinion and LOC) to me today? I wasn't sure
where this landed.

Thanks,

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 05/01/2001 09:07:33 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject: RE: Delta/Salmon

Kay:

We told Paul Hastings that we would release our Guaranty and the Opinion at
closing on Wednesday.  They were okay with that.  If that's a problem, I can
fax the guaranty and opinion (once I have it signed), with a letter from me
saying you can't release it until funding...

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:59 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Cc: Jake.Thomas@enron.com; Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Delta/Salmon

Good morning.

In order to finish up Delta/Salmon tomorrow, please note we need the
following today:

GE parent guaranty
LOC (so that full payment can be made to GE tomorrow)
Opinion of counsel

And once funds are received by GE, we need the receipt of funds letter.

Lee, I haven't heard back from the Portland gang to find out if the LV Co
Gen contract is ready.  Maybe Jake can help shake that loose.

Thanks,

Kay


how is wanting hot chocolate being cute?  i can't win!!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

dont try and be cute

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no silly, hot chocolate because it is going to be cold outside.  well and in here.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

drinks with me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

so you know what i can't wait to go and get tomorrow afternoon!


The report of my absence is premature - I will be in our South American
offices Mon. - Thurs. of next week but am in the office in Houston all of
this week.

I am also not aware of any memoranda on point.  I have seen the issue
addressed in an off-hand way in one or more articles (not really legal
analysis) and will keep my eyes open for those.  The bottom line is usually
that insurance requires an actual loss and proof of that loss before a claim
can be made on the insurance while in the case of the derivative, no loss
needs to be shown, only the actual weather conditions described in the
agreement.

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
03/09/99 01:58 PM ---------------------------

Shari Stack
03/09/99 11:57 AM
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Lynda Clemmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Weather

I am not aware of any ECT commissioned memo addressing why OTC Weather
Transactions are not considered contracts for insurance. Mark may know
something I don't but FYI- he is out of the office on business for the next 2
weeks.

We do have a memo from Cadwalader which discusses whether a weather contract
can be considered a "commodity" within the meaning of the U.S. Commodities
Exchange Act. I will fax that over to you now for info.

Kind regards,

Shari


Vince and Stinson,

I have to go back to China to attend my father's funeral on Saterday Jan. 20.
My father passed away last Sunday.

My schedule is:

Leave Houston:  Jan 18 (Thursday)
Arrive Houston:   Jan 27 (Saterday)

I will take care of a few things before I go

1) Review for Paulo and Bob
2) Talk to Alex on the compound option on a power plant
3) Talk to Bob on volatility and correlation skews, to finish up this project
for John Arnold
4) Telephone interview for Japan Office.

Zimin


Please include this information with Scott's


Here is the spreadsheet we discussed in today's meeting.  It should be pretty
straightforward.  If you have any questions, please ask.  I'll be happy to
help you out.

I will look at a way to "tie-in" Winzip with this spreadsheet.  I don't know
if it is possible, but if I can accomplish it, I'll let you know.

Greg

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 10:59 AM
---------------------------

Greg Couch
09/27/2000 02:17 PM
To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Excel file to help you out

Here is a spreadsheet I worked up to help you determine what files need to be
cleaned up.  It is pretty simple and straightforward.  You can enter a
directory, file extention (if you want all file types, just enter a "*"), a
minimum file size, and a modified before date.  The spreadsheet will perform
a search of the directory and all subdirectories and return the files
matching the criteria you specified.

The information is returned sorted by directory, but you can then sort by
size, date, or whatever.

This should help you make a quick pass through your files on the "O" drive to
determine some of the older/bigger ones you can clean up.

I would encourage you not to just enter "O:\" in the directory because the
program will take forever, and you will run out of rows in excel to store the
data.  Since it is in Excel, it will take just a while if you run it on a
directory with a lot of files, so be a little patient.

I don't want to spend a lot of time supporting this thing, so if you
distribute further, just don't tell them where you got it from (unless you
want to designate a given person on your desk to perform the work).

Let me know if you have questions or problems.

Greg


Conference Call With Mark Bronzo-- Groupama Asset Management Large Cap
Growth Portfolio Manager

During the past few months, we have been active in arranging an exclusive
series of conference calls with various market strategists and portfolio
managers that we feel could provide insight into the recent events in the
markets that are relevant to your investments.

On Wednesday, May 23, 2001, we have arranged an exclusive opportunity for
you to attend a conference call with institutional portfolio manager Mark P.
Bronzo. Mr. Bronzo is currently Chairman, President and CEO of the GAMNA
Series Funds Inc. and Senior Vice President, Managing Director and Board
Member of Groupama Asset Management NA. Mr. Bronzo's primary responsibility
is the management of the large cap equity portfolio for Groupama Asset
Management and its clients.

Mr. Bronzo is a Chartered Financial Analyst. He has an MBA in Finance from
New York University and a BA in Economics from Boston College. He has also
been featured on CNBC's "Taking Stock" and on Bloomberg television. He will
discuss his outlook on the overall markets, and also leave some time at the
end of the call to answer a few questions. Following is the information you
will need to participate in this call:

Date:                         Wednesday, May 23
Time:                         10:00 am cst

Phone #:                    888-867-5802

Pass Code:                3866608

To help ensure the conference begins in a timely manner, they ask that we
dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the conference.

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


The following comes to mind:

Describe the inputs to VAR and the sources of the inputs
Discuss Enron's timing of running the VAR calculation
Explain the diversification effect
Explain that only Officialized books are included in the VAR calculation
Explain how Enron uses the VAR for risk measurement, portfolio performance
analysis, individual trader analysis
Address Risk Policy limits related to VAR
A comparison of Enron's risk appetite, measured in VAR, vs. other financial
companies would be interesting
How does Enron'e use of VAR as a risk measurement tool compare with our
competitors?
Explain why the VAR engine would have different positions than our benchmark
reports.
Discuss Component VAR
Discuss useful analyses Enron can implement utilizing VAR (Sharpe ratio, VAR
efficiency, etc.)

Hope this helps,
Mike

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           08/31/2000 04:11 PM

To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: V@R training Sign-up list & misc info

Last chance for imput for V@R classes...

I'm bothering you about this because it seems to me that you are the one who
is so intimately involved w/ V@R and would understand possibilities here..

Thanks,
PT
---------------------- Forwarded by Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
04:09 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           08/31/2000 04:05 PM

To: Gracie S Presas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: V@R training Sign-up list & misc info

Gracie,

I have attached sign-up list.  Please order materials & make whatever
arrangements are necessary for both classes.   We have 24 signed up for
9/14-15 session & 22 signed up for 9/21-22 session.  I asked for comments on
how to tailor class to our particular area & only got 1 response:

Give an overview of the information flow between systems to generate V@R
(ERMS, Enpower, GRMS, CAS, spreadsheets).  I don't think that everyone has a
good idea of how/where all the information comes from to run V@R on a nightly
basis.  Where does information come from. What information is passed to V@R.
How to determine underlying positions are correct.  How to troubleshoot when
V@R looks wrong.

Sally's cost codes are:
Company #:  0413
Cost Center #: 105588

Please let me know what else you need from me.

Thanks for your help,
Patti x39106


Molly,

We are in process of setting up an interview.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           10/18/2000 02:56 PM

To: jlew@kent.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidential

Dr. Lew:   Vince Kaminski has asked me to contact you in connection with your
interest in Enron.   He would like to schedule a mutually convenient time for
you to visit Houston and meet with his group.   The dates that have been
suggested are:   Wednesday, 10/25/2000; Thursday, 10/26/2000; or Friday,
10/27/2000.    I hope that one of these dates will be convenient for you to
come in for interviews.

You may either respond to me by email, or phone me at 713 853-4804, whichever
is easier for you.   I am also leaving a voicemail message for you at your
home phone number.

We hope to hear from you soon.

Molly Magee
Recruiting Manager


i heard there are a lot of hot cougars at changs


I think we need coordination on all plant matters.  Mark


i have a dinner to go to


Sandy, we are still finalizing the contract and expected volumes with Cabot
Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation for the two Terrebonne Parish deals
referenced above, but we expect to enter into a long term deal prior to the
end of December.  Would you please re-confirm that the notional pricing set
forth in your 11/13/2000 memo for the two Cabot Terrebonne Parish deals is
still valid for 5 years firm out of January 2001 for 80% of the volumes cited
in my original request .  Thanks.

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sandy Olitsky                           11/13/2000 02:11 PM

To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Crockett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cabot Quotes

George:

We got new quotes from the desk regarding Cabot.  Attached is the spreadsheet
with the new numbers.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks.
Sandy


Rosalee:  Thank you for this good news.  I will come back to you early in
the New Year to provide more information on how this is developing.  Best
for the Season.  WCRamsay

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Kenneth.Lay@enron.com [mailto:Kenneth.Lay@enron.com]
  Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:50 PM
  To: RAMSAY William, IEA/EXD
  Cc: Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Rob.Bradley@enron.com;
Tori.L.Wells@enron.com
  Subject: IEA Ministerial/OECD Ministerial

  Hi Mr. Ramsay -

  In regard to your request for Ken to chair a Forum segment
and join the
  Ministerial dinner, with the Chair of the other Session in
May, he said
  that he would be delighted to participate.

  We look forward to receiving additional information after
the Governing
  Board has its meeting.

  Rosalee


---------------------- Forwarded by Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:30
AM ---------------------------
From: Mathew Gimble on 05/07/2001 09:42 AM
To: Darrell Stovall/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Coleman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jennifer
Bagwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: FPRP -- Proforma Performance Input/Review M Today 5/7 2:30 PM
3AC 33C1

Darrell,

There still appears to be some confusion regarding the inclusion of FPUA's #6
ST into the deal.  The heat rate of the #6 ST should not be included in the
overall plant heat rate (neither gross nor net).  The heat rate of the
facility should include the GT and FPUA's #7 and #8 STs.  Duct firing #6
needs to be determined and calculated on a stand-alone basis.  Bottom line:
whether FPUA or FPRP uses #6 to generate power, the heat rate associated with
#6 is the duct fired heat rate.  I have been anticipating results to look
something like the following:

Combined Cycle HHV  7,800 heat rate (based on 183MW + 82MW = 265MW using
2,067MMBtu/hr)
FPUA 9,500 HHV  9,500 heat rate on 82MW = 779MMBtu/hr
FPRP Combined Cycle HHV 2,067MMBtu/hr - 779MMBtu/hr = 1,288MMBtu/hr for 183MW
= 7,038 heat rate

Duct Firing HHV   10,000 heat rate on 14MW = 140MMBtu/hr (should equal the
actual amount of additional gas needed to duct fire)

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Mathew

Darrell Stovall@ENRON
05/07/2001 08:38 AM
To: Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Bagwell/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike Coleman/Enron@EnronXGate,
Sandra EECC Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: FPRP -- Proforma Performance Input/Review M Today 5/7 2:30 PM 3AC
33C1

I,d like to set up meeting to review performance inputs to proforma ... today
5/7 at 2:30 PM 3AC 33C1.

Jennifer, please coordinate with ENA participants and with Sandra R @ 5_6426
to ensure we have the essential folks available.

Updated Proforma Input (Still Preliminary)
We worked with CMI much of last week to revise HRSG configuration to
accommodate addition of ST#6. This is turning out to be moderate change to
design ... potential cost/schedule impacts still under assessment ...
continuing/should finalize this week. Also updated assessment of aux loads --
increased split to GT resulting in reduced net output.

Output = 185 - 3.5 = 181.5 MW net (due to higher GT aux loads)

HR (Plant-net) = 7980/7196 HHV/LHV (increased due to impact of ST#6)

HR (GT-gross) = 10,326/9311 HHV/LHV

Degradation -- See attached curves ... this is the best currently available
degradation data. It's a Sieman-Westinghouse curve -- still trying to get MHI
data. Typically, either apply curves or use ~5% flat degradation as
alternative. Needs to be coordinated with Operating/maintenance plan.

I'll be working with engineering personnel to firm up as much as possible and
be ready for meeting this afternoon.

thx/dgs


Marcela,

I emailed you a couple of days ago asking for the Tail # for the plane the
Whalley's will be returning on Sunday.  Could you please furnish me with this
information.

Many Thanks,

Liz

"MARCELA WHITE" <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM> on 10/09/2000 04:16:33 PM
To: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Liz

We got it, thank you.  Everything is set.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
To: <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Liz

>
> Marcela,
>
> I faxed it this morning.  Have you still not received?
>
> Liz
>
>
>
>
> "MARCELA WHITE" <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM> on 10/09/2000 11:03:10 AM
>
> To:   <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Liz
>
>
>
> Liz:
> Did you get my credit card form? As soon as you get a  chance could you
> complete it and return to me via fax. Thank you. I  need this prior to
> the trip departing this week. Thank you,  Marcela
>
>
>
>


To get off the list, please send an e-mail to: LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG and
in the subject line, please put "SIGNOFF RRGA-L"

Thank you!

- Sarah

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nickeson-Moore, Nikki" <NNicke@PUGET.COM>
To: <RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:50 PM

> Please remove my name from future mailings.  Kimberly Harris of Puget
Sound
> Energy should be receiving all information relating to RTO.  Thanks!
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1[SMTP:kadalia@BPA.GOV]
> > Reply To:     RTO West Regional Representatives Group
> > Sent:         Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:39 PM
> > To:   RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
> >
> > You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion
Model
> > Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.
> >
> > Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is
the
> > first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever
need
> > to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions
below.
> > Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of
all
> > future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special
mail
> > folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that
you
> > are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go
on
> > vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill
up
> > your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the
"welcome
> > messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive
after
> > subscribing to a new list.
> >
> > To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the
list,
> > just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending
mail
> > to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and
LISTSERV
> > makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This
address
> > (RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You
must
> > never try to send any command to that address, as it would be
distributed
> > to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to
the
> > "LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
> > important to understand  the difference between the  two, but
fortunately
> > it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number
that
> > connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a
normal
> > voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial
the
> > FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you
will
> > quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No
harm
> > will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your
FAX
> > call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will
be
> > inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes.
The
> > fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to
the
> > voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop
does
> > not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice
number.
> > People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way
with
> > mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds
or
> > thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect
a
> > lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the
list
> > address.
> >
> > You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L"
command
> > to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
> > want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If
you
> > do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and
LISTSERV
> > will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that
the
> > message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a
while
> > you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your
mail
> > program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it
informs
> > you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L
ACK
> > NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement
instead,
> > which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most
mail
> > programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement
you
> > can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements
completely
> > with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".
> >
> > Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription
options
> > have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV
defaults.
> > For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY
RRGA-L"
> > command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.
> >
> > Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get
a
> > list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L"
command
> > to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
> > with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database
search
> > facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on
the
> > latter.
> >
> > This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive
the
> > digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST
command.
> >
> > Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to
determine
> > that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the
"REVIEW"
> > command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all
the
> > subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue
a
> > "SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.
> >
> > More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the
LISTSERV
> > reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO
REFCARD"
> > command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.
> >


We executed final documentation on sale of the Noram rig for $9 million ($4.4 million net to Enron).  Although the purchaser has until April 13th to fund, there are no contingencies in the contract and SCF Partners controls the entity.  The delay in funding is required since there is a 21-day period for them to make their capital calls.

A number of things came together for us this week, which is good.

The week is now over.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 04:36 PM ---------------------------

Richard Lydecker
03/16/2001 04:07 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Re: Inland Resources

Thanks.  The week's not over.  Stay tuned.

Louise Kitchen@ECT
03/16/2001 03:43 PM
To:	Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Re: Inland Resources

Excellent - it has been a great week for you guys.  Three dashes and a handshake deal.

Have a good week-end.

Louise

Richard Lydecker@ENRON
03/16/2001 10:06 AM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Inland Resources

Today we negotiated a handshake agreement with Smith Properties to buy out JEDI's position in Inland for $2 million ($1 million net to Enron).  The DASH minimum was $1.25 million ($612,500 net to Enron), the original offer.  Documentation will be simple:  our rep is limited to we own it and we can sell it.  Expect to close and fund next week.

Given the Inland situation and the absence of any foreseeable payment on our preferred, I view this outcome as very favorable.

Brandi Morris' work on this transaction was outstanding.

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Thanks Vince.
My guys in London are working on Howard right now.
Keep you informed and updated.
Thank you,
Jeff
949 813 2241
*******************************************************
Hi Jeff,

 Re. Howard Haughton

 Further to your recent communications with Vince Kaminski with regards to
 the above candidate we would like to see him for an interview at our London
 offices. Could you please advise me of a convenient time for Howard or
 details on how to contact him to arrange this. He will be seeing four
 people for approximately 45 minutes each. We would like to do this
 preferably on Wednesday or Thursday of this week as some of Vince's team
 will be in London on those days.

 Please contact me if you have any queries on 0044 20 7783 5677 or via
 e-mail.

 Look forward to hearing from you

 With regards
 Rachel Quirke
 Human Resources

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *


>
> This is a personal inquiry - if you choose not to respond that's OK with
> me given the subject matter.  Background:  I don't believe some 'survey'
> information regarding salaries which has been received from ONEOK's HR
> department.  So, to make this general, into which salary range do you
> fall: 1) Under 75,000 2) 75,001 - 95,000 or 3) 95,001-120,000 or 4)
> 120,001-150,000 5) Over 150,000.  Call it range 1/2/3/4/5. I'm going to
> ask all of my contacts that are knowledgeable and experienced if they
> would be so gracious as to participate. (I'm talking base salary.)


I thought of you yesterday.  I planted an eggplant plant and a pepper plant.
What a great weekend - I lived outside.  What about you?

ckm

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/14/2001 01:17 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Confidentiality agreement

Still pretty nasty language huh?  How was your Mother's Day Mulching Party?
Great day wasn't it?

K-

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 01:00 PM
To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT
cc: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, W David Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron)

Subject: Confidentiality agreement

Gentlemen,

I'm with EWS Legal, and I'm working with John Llodra (East Power origination)
concerning a confidentiality agreement with Ameresco.  The proposed
transaction is described as follows:

 A potential power plant site development and asset management services
related to the Island End Generation Project, a nominal  365 MW combined
cycle power generation facility, proposed to be located in Everett,
Massachusetts.

The current draft of the CA contains this language:

 From the time of the signing of this Agreement until October 1, 2001 neither
Party shall pursue the Proposed Transaction without  the participation of the
other Party, unless the other Party consents in writing or notifies the other
Party that it does not intend to   pursue the Proposed Transaction.

In accordance with policy, this issue is being submitted to you for your
review.

John can be contacted at 978 449 9936.  My extension is 57566.

Thank you,

Kay

Here is the entire CA:


Attached is the latest Q2 Target Sheet.  Earnings to date are $66.1m. With
expected trading results of $81.1m and expected origination of $79.1m, we are
currently showing a shortfall of $23m to our target of $249.3m

Please contact Buddy Aiken or myself with any questions or comments.

Regards,

Stephen
x37704


Thane, I think the doc that was prepared needs to be more user friendly and
explain better what is intended.  For example, what is shadowing.  What do
want with anciliary services?  Should all ancilliary services be deregulated
and available at market based rates or should they be available at the
suppliers option based on a tariff rate, etc.  We should not assume that the
reader understands what we want.  Thanks.
Janine

	Thane Twiggs@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/08/2000 03:13 PM

		 To: Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Janice
R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Justice/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike E Kelly/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Damon Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janine
Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: First Draft of eTransMart FAQ's

Please see the note below.   EtransMart is the consortium's name for E-trans
and they are putting together the FAQ's for their website.  If you have any
comments feel free to send them to me and I will forward them to Dave.
----- Forwarded by Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/08/2000 03:04 PM -----

	"Dave Perrino" <dperrino@apx.com>
	11/08/2000 02:47 PM
	Please respond to dperrino

		 To: <Jeff.Brown@enron.com>, <david.sun@alstom.esca.com>, <dfoley@apx.com>,
<jchapman@apx.com>, <jd.hammerly@alstom.esca.com>, <jeflory@calpx.com>,
<mheinrich@apx.com>, <norris.peterson@alstom.esca.com>,
<randy.berry@alstom.esca.com>, <rbjohnson@calpx.com>, <rday@apx.com>,
<rpseide@calpx.com>, <rsamuelson@apx.com>, <trevor.alvey@alstom.esca.com>,
<Thane.Twiggs@enron.com>
		 cc: <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, <Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com>,
<jmigden@enron.com>, <Lloyd.Will@enron.com>, <Steve.Walton@enron.com>,
<nmathur@apx.com>, <lfisher@apx.com>
		 Subject: First Draft of eTransMart FAQ's

To All,

Mike Heinrich has asked me to make a first draft of some FAQ's for our
collaborative's web site.  I have taken a shot a several questions.  I would
appreciate if you could review the attached document and add/modify it as
you see fit.  Once you've made your additions and/or deletions, please send
it back to me by this Sunday (November 12) so that I may incorporate all the
suggestions and send out a "final" draft for the groups approval prior to
our posting this information on the web site.

If you have any questions feel free to send me questions via email and I
will respond as soon as I return from vacation on Sunday.

Kind Regards,

Dave

David F. Perrino
Automated Power Exchange
Grid Management Services
Director Market Development - West
5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 522
Santa Clara, CA  95054
Voice: 408.517.2146
Mobile: 650.906.5020
Fax:  408.517.2985
Visit us at: http://www.apx.com

 - eTransMart Frequently Asked Questions.doc


Are you experiencing some sort of split personality today?  Should I start
referring to you as Ben or MaximMan depending on your responses?


553809 - changed to APB
553810 - changed to APB

554166 - changed to BP Energy Co.

Jeff is entering the rest of his deals right now.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   03/19/2001 02:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Checkout 3/19/01

Kate-

Apb checkout     Badeer
missing deals:   Enron Buys Relaint 290.00 Apr SP15 on peak  25 mws believe
deal 553809.01, need to ch bro to apb
  Enron Sells Reliant 310.00 Apr NP15 on peak 25 mws believe deal 553810.01,
need to ch bro to apb

554166.01 Mallory, please ch Cp name to BP Energy Co

Missing Jeff Richter trades:
Enron Buys PGET
April 25 mws SP15   290.00

Enron Buys BP Energy
3/21-3/31  50 mws
SP15   330.00


Mark,

I have arranged for an Ericsson 1888 World phone to be sent to your hotel in
Munich, Germany.  It has been guaranteed to arrive by 12.00 noon tomorrow,
Friday 27th August.

The mobile number for this phone is 07881 512535, an International Mail Box
Number has been set up and an instruction sheet should be inside the box on
how to access messages whilst abroad.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance.

Regards
Nikki


I am sorry you lost the trade but this is not a matter that should be worked in the broker market nor should anybody be looking to profit off the situation. It is being handled directly to ensure the integity and liquidity in the market that is beneficial to all.


My comments pertain to page 2 of the chart under section C.4
referring to increasing the cashout prices to 75% and 125%.  I recommend a
few changes.  First the chart makes a reference to increasing Tier II
cashout prices under the Content Column.  This should be changed to Tier I
cashout prices consistent with the OFO settlement.  Second, it may be
appropriate to provide some additional details on this issue in the Change
to Gas Accord column.  One option is something along the following lines:
"None.  This change is consistent with the Gas Accord provision which allows
PG&E to file to revise imbalance charges and cash-out options.  The current
Tier I cashout prices do not provide an economic disincentive for incurring
cash-out imbalances in all months as intended in the Gas Accord.  This can
serve as a factor contributing to pipeline OFOs.  The change to the Tier I
cash-out prices is consistent with the intent of the Gas Accord, and the
objective to reduce pipeline OFO's."

-----Original Message-----
From: Yoo, Salle [mailto:salleyoo@dwt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 2:32 PM
To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Gerald Worster'; 'Grant
Kolling'; 'James Weil'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; 'John Leslie'; 'Marcel
Hawiger'; 'Mark Baldwin'; 'Mark Pocta'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Raveen
Maan'; 'Rich Hall'; 'Ron Oechsler'; 'Tom Solberg'; 'Timothy J Hamilton';
'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com';
'jmct@gmssr.com'
Cc: How-Downing, Lindsey
Subject: FW: Comments on OFO Settlement

Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Comments of the Settlement Parties in
Support of the OFO Settlement.  ("Comments")  The Comments address the
specific issues raised by ALJ Biren at the last prehearing conference as
laid out below in our previous email.

I am also attaching a copy of the Declaration of Dan Thomas (addressing how
the Settlement is in the public interest) and the matrix developed by PG&E
that compares the terms of the OFO Settlement to those in the Gas Accord.

In order to expedite the process, PG&E has suggested that it, as a
representative of all settlement parties, be the sole signatory to the
Comments.  Therefore, please review the enclosed documents, provide any
revisions and an indication of your assent/dissent to having PG&E sign the
document on your behalf by end of business tomorrow (Thursday, November 18).
The deadline for filing the Comments in Monday, November 22.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Salle E. Yoo
Davis Wright Tremaine
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel. 415 276-6564; Fax 415 276-6599
salleyoo@dwt.com

 <<Comments_OFO.doc>>  <<dft-dec.doc>>  <<chart.doc>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yoo, Salle
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 11:16 AM
> To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Ben Ledene'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Grant Kolling';
> 'Jeff Dasovich'; 'John Leslie'; 'Marcel Hawiger'; 'Mark Pocta'; 'Michael
> Rochman'; 'Raveen Maan'; 'Ron Oechsler'; 'Tom Solberg'; 'Rich Hall'; 'Mark
> Baldwin'; 'Timothy J Hamilton'; 'pgg4@pge.com'
> Cc: 'Katie Elder'; How-Downing, Lindsey
> Subject: Comments on OFO Settlement
>
> CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION SUBJECT TO CPUC RULE 51
>
>
>  As you recall, at the prehearing conference, Judge Biren directed
> the OFO settlement parties to provide her with additional information
> regarding the OFO settlement.  Friday, Nov.12, Patrick Golden and I had a
> follow-up conversation with Judge Biren to confirm the procedure by which
> she desires to receive the information.
>
>  As a result of the call, Patrick and I suggest that the OFO
> settlement parties file joint "Comments Supporting Settlement" on Nov 22,
> along with any other party which may file comments on the settlement.  Our
> comments would encompass the following:
>
> 1) The settlement is in the public interest as attested by an attached
> declaration.
>
> 2) The settlement does not constitute a change in the basic Gas Accord
> settlement; it merely refines implementation details on the Gas Accord.
> As a result, no hearings are necessary on the settlement.
>
> 3) Neither SB1602 nor 1421 impact immediate Commission approval of the
> settlement.
>
> 4) The settlement is intended to be a final, not an interim, settlement.
>
>  With respect to Judge Biren's request for declarations (which she
> reconfirmed despite agreeing that Rule 51 does not require declarations),
> Patrick and I discussed having the settling parties provide one
> declaration from PG&E outlining the reasons why the settlement is in the
> public interest, and having the PG&E declarant be authorized to state that
> the following parties authorize him to state that they support his
> declaration.
>
>  Judge Biren confirmed that any replies to our comments would be due
> along with all other reply comments on the settlement.
>
>  If you have any comments or suggestions on this approach, please let
> either Salle Yoo or me know ASAP.
>
>
> Lindsey How-Downing
> Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
> One Embarcadero, Suite 600
> San Francisco, California 94111
> Phone 415-276-6512
> Fax     415-276-6599
> Email  lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com

 - att1.htm