As mentioned, I will be out on vacation next week.  This contact list should
be helpful if you need anything while I am out.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 06:44 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           07/05/2000 06:23 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation Scheduled - Contact List

I will be out of the office on vacation from Monday, July 10 through Friday,
July 14.  Patti Thompson, my assistant (x39106), has telephone numbers where
I can be reached if needed.  In my absence, please contact the following
persons in Houston with questions.  Peggy Hedstrom is the appropriate contact
in Calgary.

 Natural Gas Operations  Brent Price   x37647
 Power Operations   Kristin Albrecht  x34763
 Financial Products Operations Sheila Glover  x33210
 Coal, Pulp & Paper, LNG  Scott Earnest  x31746
 Weather     Todd Hall    x31957

 DPR      Mike Moscoso  x35242
 MPR      Todd Hall   x31957

I will be back in the office on Monday, July 17.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 06:22
AM ---------------------------

Felicia Doan
12/11/2000 05:07 PM
To: Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell
Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Ballinger/NA/Enron@Enron, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason
Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lawrence Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karla Compean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne
Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gerald
Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Gordon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Hebert/HOU/ECT@ect, Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Wayne Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George
Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect, Rika
Imai/NA/Enron@Enron, Alton Jackson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Justice/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike E
Kelly/NA/Enron@Enron, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron,
John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andy Pace/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan
Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zachary
Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anna Santucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Janelle
Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erik Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ramanarao Tamma/NA/Enron@Enron, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Greg Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Larry Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jewell
Wade/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher
Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent Hebert/HOU/ECT@ect, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alton
Jackson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Justin Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Erik Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul D Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Chen/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Vendor Demos for ERCOT ISO

There will be Vendor Demos for ERCOT ISO on the following days:

Day/Date  Time   Vendor Name    Location

Tuesday, 12/12  9AM - 11:30AM  Altra/Majors Caldwell   EB3125B
Tuesday, 12/12  3PM - 5PM  Structure Consulting/Loen Winstead EB3125B
Wednesday, 12/13 9AM - 11:30AM  Alston ESCA/Lawrence Ferry  EB3125B
Thursday, 12/14  9AM - 11:30AM  ABB/David L'Anson   EB3125B

If you need additional information, please contact Madhup Kumar at ext.
3-0608.

Many Thanks,

Felicia
for Madhup Kumar

---------------------- Forwarded by Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 04:51
PM ---------------------------

Madhup Kumar@ENRON
12/08/2000 12:32 PM
To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen@ECT, Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vendor Demos for ERCOT ISO

Following is the schedule for vendor demos for ERCOT ISO:

12/12/00  9 am to 12pm   Tue day Altra   Majors Caldwell 713-419-3461
12/12/00  3 pm to 5 pm Tue day Structure Consulting Loen Winstead
919-349-3997
12/13/00  9  am to 12 pm  Wed day Alstom ESCA  Lawrence Ferry 206-465-3358
12/14/00  9 am to 12 pm  Thurs day ABB   David I'Anson    919-621-5742

Felicia will let us know the conf room.

Felicia,
Please schedule the rooms at least 1 hr earlier so that vendors can setup the
equipment.

Thanks.
Madhup


Great to hear from you.  Looking forward to meeting in Houston for a baseball game.
Conway will be in Corpis soon so we should be able to do a weekend.  We should start
construction on the house in May - what an incredibly long process it is.  I definitely would
not do it if I had to do it over again.  One redeeming factor is that we bought on a good
block.  We definitely have the ugliest house on the block.  We should get a pop in real
estate also when all the California companies start migrating to Texas.

Joking aside, unless you guys have incredibly mild weather this summer combined with
a lot of rainfall, you're summer will suck.  There is no doubt that the CA economy is going
to suffer a great recession.  You have a shortage of supply so the only way to ease the
problem is to reduce demand.  This usually occurs when prices reach levels where the price
sensitive buyers cut back.  However, with your boy Grey Davis pushing for  price caps, this won't
happen.   The next way for demand to be trimmed is for companies to leave, so this will probably
need to happen to an extent for the problem to ease.  The other factor, of course, is that you
could have an increase in supply - new power plants.  But being that the amt. of time it takes to
develop and build a power plant in CA is about 3 times as long as in most other states combined
with the fact that CA hasn't had a new power plant in the last 10 years, an increase in supply
doesn't seem likely in the short term.  Again, this is only my opinion, so you could take it with
a grain of salt.

Talk to you soon.

Kevin


FYI.     This was the detail provided to Sarabeth.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/13/2000
07:04 AM ---------------------------

12/11/2000 10:07 AM
John Jesse

To: Sarabeth Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Lease Option on Trailblazer

To recap our recent discussion, my understanding was that you were looking
for an Enron or NBP entity to serve as the lessor in a lease financing
transaction that would be offered as an option in the pending EAMR bid for
the Trailblazer construction project.  Since such transaction would need to
be priced based upon the credit rating of the entity or the sponsors
(depending upon the structure) the expected returns will not justify the
balance sheet impact on Northern Border Partners if this entity were to
function as lessor.  Furthermore, I have assumed that this conclusion also
holds true from Enron's perspective given their strategy of reserving balance
sheet capacity for higher return projects.

Since the bid parameters do not specify a lease requirement, Trailblazer may
already have funding in place.  If not, EAMR could insert language in the bid
that they or their designee would arrange lease financing for the project
upon selection of EAMR as the winning bidder.  At that point, we would work
with commercial banks or major leasing companies to develop a cost-effective
financing transaction.

I hope this addresses your questions regarding the feasibility of such a
transaction, but please call me at x7843 in Omaha if you wish to discuss
further.  Good luck with your bid!


You'll be delighted to know that the call has moved to 1000 your time, noon
central.

Kay

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
12/15/2000 10:21 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: NRG

Would love to, but I'm on a conflicting call for the LV Cogen EPC contract.

Kay Mann@ENRON
12/15/2000 07:03 AM
To: Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NRG

How about a conference call at 1100 (Central) time?

Kay


Wednesday, April 25 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Sherri Sera, executive
assistant to Jeff Skilling, on eSpeak.  Sherri will answer questions about
how her job has changed since Jeff became CEO.

If you can't make the live event, post your questions on eSpeak now.  Sherri
will answer them during her eSpeak, and you can find the answers in the
transcript later.

Have you been wondering what happened to the information about Enron's
severance pay policy?   Would you like to see an innovation suggestion for
the Saturn's ring that will connect the two Enron buildings?  Read the new
postings in the "Office of the Chairman" category in eMeet.

Thanks for the great response to the new "Cost Reduction" category in the
Idea Vault!  Visit the ThinkBank today and read the suggestions for cutting
costs; and, while you're there, add your own.


Peggy,

Attached is the market wrap of last week that I am going to send out today.

thanks,
Monika


I have finally put together a binder on the materials from the ISDA seminar I
attended in October; day one was devoted to credit derivatives, and day two
was devoted to collateral/credit support in general.

Enclosed is an index of the materials; please feel free to take a look at the
binder if you wish. -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


FYI
Jessie J. Knight Jr. <<RE Press Conference.htm>>
President & CEO
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce

 - RE Press Conference.htm


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed052201.pdf
 - ed052201.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

"Jacqueline Blanchard" <Jacqueline.Blanchard@dvn.com> on 06/20/2000 04:29:13
PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Revised Availabilities

 - TEXT.htm


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE][IMAGE]  [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  November 12, 2001  Dynegy and Enron Announce Merger   By Will McNamara Director, Electric Industry Analysis  [News item from Reuters]  Dynegy Inc. (NYSE: DYN) agreed on Nov. 9 to acquire rival Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) for some $9 billion in stock, underlining the dramatic reversal of fortunes for the Houston-based energy trading giant that was valued last year at nearly $80 billion. Enron's stock fell sharply in the past month due to investors' concerns about murky transactions that sparked an investigation by U.S. regulators and damaging downgrades by credit rating agencies. The merged company will retain the Dynegy name. It will have annual revenues of more than $200 billion and assets worth $90 billion, including more than 22,000 megawatts of electricity generating capacity and 25,000 miles of natural-gas pipelines. It will be North America's biggest marketer and trader of natural gas and electricity, positions previously held by Enron.  Analysis: Well, it's now official. The announcement of what presumably will be the final chapter in the Enron saga came with much fanfare at the end of last week. It is indeed a dramatic end. Enron, the maverick and innovative company that has often been credited for literally creating deregulated markets in the energy industry, will no longer exist after what has been a very quick and unbelievable fall from grace over the last several months. Dynegy, the slow and methodical company that took a more traditional approach toward success, is making a stunning acquisition of its formal rival and locking in much of the industry market share of Enron. Can there be any doubt that this is the energy industry's manifestation of the tortoise and the hare parable? Enron has clearly lost the race to Dynegy, but is making a smart choice to be bought, considering its desperate circumstances and the unlikelihood of its regaining financial strength on its own. For Dynegy, this acquisition is a major win, as the combination will create the  biggest and strongest energy merchant in the world.   There are so many interesting dimensions to this mammoth deal. Before addressing some issues related to the approval of the deal, let's establish some of the key points of the merger agreement. There have been some mixed reports, but it is generally believed that Dynegy is buying Enron for about $10 a share, quite a steal considering that just over a year ago Enron was trading at close to $90 a share and had a market value of nearly $70 billion. Under terms of the agreement, Enron shareholders will receive 0.2685 Dynegy shares per share of Enron common stock. Dynegy's current stockholders (including ChevronTexaco Corp., which currently owns 27 percent of Dynegy) will own approximately 64 percent of the combined company, while Enron's stockholders will own approximately 36 percent of the combined company's stock at closing.   In addition, Dynegy will provide an immediate $1.5-billion asset-backed equity infusion into Enron to help the company with its current financial woes, followed by an additional infusion of $2.5 billion into the combined company by ChevronTexaco. Chuck Watson, chairman and CEO of Dynegy, will retain his position at the new company. Steve Bergstrom, president of Dynegy, and Rob Doty, chief financial officer, will retain their positions at the new company. It is not presently known what role, if any, Ken Lay, current CEO of Enron, will hold at the new company.   Of course, this acquisition could not have taken place if Enron had not fallen into a very vulnerable spot this year. Quite literally, Enron was pushed into this deal because it was running out of cash, its stock had tanked and its credit ratings were slashed to near junk levels, all within the last several weeks. Enron's decline over the course of 2001 has been the result of losses in its telecom sector, losses from its involvement in India, the departure of its former CEO Jeffrey Skilling, a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation into some of its business practices, and lack of investor confidence about Enron's honesty in its financial reporting. This last point gained validity last week when Enron announced that it had overstated earnings by 20 percent over the last four years and investors should disregard the company's financial statements from 1997 through the first half of 2001. The restating of its earnings for the last five years sliced $591 million from Enron's reported profits. In addition, Enron revised its debt upward in each year from 1997 to 2000. At the end of 2000, Enron's debt was $10.86 billion, $628 million more than it had previously reported. By not reporting this debt earlier, Enron presumably was able to maintain a stronger credit rating than it would have had the accurate records been disclosed.   The key value for Dynegy in this acquisition is Enron's successful energy trading business. In addition, Dynegy could also find synergies in Enron's retail unit, Enron Energy Services and EnronOnline, the company's electronic trading unit. Dynegy has a similar trading site known as Dynegydirect, which was launched after Enron gained the first-strike advantage in this market space. Details are still emerging, but it would make sense if Dynegy opted to not purchase other units under Enron's business structure, such as the company's water and telecom businesses, which are losing money. Dynegy has its own telecom unit, which has also lost money this year, so it may not want to expand in this slow-growing sector at this time. Vivendi Environnement, a French company that has expanded into various lines of business, has reportedly expressed interest in the remaining subsidiaries of Azurix, Enron's struggling water subsidiary. Note that Enron sold Azurix North America to American Water Works.   The deal is subject to regulatory reviews and shareholder approval from Dynegy and Enron shareholders. Dynegy shareholder approval may be contingent upon any possible downgrades on its long-term debt that Dynegy could encounter with the purchase of Enron. At this juncture, it does not appear that Dynegy will be downgraded, but this is a fast-changing story and conditions could change abruptly. Financing the deal may also be an issue, even with the infusion of capital from ChevronTexaco. Dynegy reportedly has $3 billion worth of debt and has a market capitalization of $11.7 billion. Thus, Enron's own more substantial debt may be too significant for Dynegy to absorb, a concern that may cause Dynegy shareholders to veto the deal. This issue could be helped if Dynegy only elects to purchase some of Enron's assets and if there is some repair work done on Enron's balance sheets.   The issue of regulatory approval could be difficult, as the combination of the two huge companies may cause regulators to be concerned about market power and antitrust issues. The review of this merger will be unprecedented, considering that the wholesale natural-gas and electricity trading market is still fairly young. Certainly, a deal of this magnitude has not previously occurred in the deregulating energy industry. It is not presently clear which regulatory agency will be involved in the review, although the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department could all be involved. FERC would most likely become involved only if the acquisition includes the transfer of a physical asset, such as a pipeline. FERC may not become involved if the deal is structured solely as an exchange of stock. Not involving FERC would be more advantageous for Dynegy and Enron as the timeline for approval would be significantly shorter.   An issue that most likely will be at the top of the list of review items for regulators would be the extent to which the combination of Enron and Dynegy would hold market power in the natural-gas trading space, which could pre-empt market entry by other competitors. The combined company would be considerably larger than its nearest competitors. Scope and scale are considered the top competitive assets in the trading sector, and the combination of Dynegy and Enron will certainly have those assets in abundance. It will fall on regulators to determine if the combined company is so large that it precludes other competitors from emerging into the same space.   To say that this deal is a sweet victory for Chuck Watson is an understatement. The two rival companies followed very different paths to success. Enron, under the leadership of Jeffrey Skilling in particular, espoused an unorthodox belief that the company did not need to own physical assets in order to achieve success in the energy-trading space. Dynegy, on the other hand, approached the market from the opposite perspective, and diligently acquired diverse generation assets across the United States and internationally to support its trading operation. Up until the start of 2001, it appeared that Enron's strategy was the more successful of the two. Enron, with $100 billion in revenues and $1 billion in profits in 2000, ranked fifth on Fortune 500's list of largest U.S. companies. In contrast, Dynegy ranked 54 on the same list and had $29 billion in revenues and $500 million in earnings. However, 2000 turned out to be Dynegy's year and the success continued into 2001, the very year that would bring Enron's downfall. Enron's problems culminated in $638 million in losses in the third quarter, after taking $1.01 billion in charges associated with several of its non-core businesses. Taken with the other factors plaguing the company, Enron became exceptionally vulnerable and prone to a takeover, which has now provided Dynegy with a strong gain.   The purchase of Enron will literally quadruple Dynegy's size and should immediately provide an accretive earnings contribution. Further, Dynegy claims that it expects a 15- to 20-percent annual earnings growth over the next three years following its planned acquisition of Enron. If it gains all of the necessary regulatory approvals, Dynegy will become the undisputed market leader in the energy industry, with annual revenues of $200 billion and $90 billion in assets. The company will have 22,000 MW of generating capacity, which moves its closer to the previously established goal of accumulating 70,000 MW by 2005. In other words, the combined company will dwarf any other competition in the trading sector and be considerably ahead of its nearest competitors such as Mirant or Duke Energy in terms of size, resources and assets.   Word of the acquisition caused Enron's shares to increase some, one of the few upward bumps that the company had experienced in the last few months. Shares of Enron rose 44 cents, or 5.2 percent, to $8.85 in mid-day trade on the New York Stock Exchange on Nov. 9. As of early morning trade on Nov. 12, Enron shares were priced at $9.40. Shares of Dynegy gained $2.24, or 5.8 percent, to $41 in early trade on the New York Stock Exchange.   An archive list of previous IssueAlert articles is available at www.scientech.com    We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments.  We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring    Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  at 505.244.7650.  Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.    Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission and distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com   or call Nancy Spring at 505.244.7613.    SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer colleagues to receive our free,  daily IssueAlert articles, please register directly on our site at secure.scientech.com/issuealert .   If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit  http://secure.scientech.com/account/  to unsubscribe.  Otherwise, please send an e-mail to  to IssueAlert , with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.    SCIENTECH's IssueAlert(SM) articles are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlert articles is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.     Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.

[IMAGE]


it is a done deal.yes

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

Are you going to bring it to me tonight?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

yes i am what is the name of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:42 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

You still buying that lipstick for me?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:18 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

 Do you have it with you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

good morninig i have your beauty blotters itis $5.00 plus tax.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Please comment ASAP.  Want to get to Fallon.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: NOTE ON Neg CTC

Here's my cut:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	NOTE ON Neg CTC

Please add so we can get to Fallon on Monday.

Jim

 << File: EES and EEMC Negative CTC.doc >>


Fernley,

Per my voicemail, are you available to meet w/Greg Whalley on Thursday, June
5 for about an hour?

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


Yes, authorized.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daffin, Margaret
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Benson, Robert; Tessandori, Bobbi
Subject:	Robert Benson's Visa

Kevin:  Rob Benson called me this morning to ask about the process for Permanent Residency (Green Card).  At this time, I have been asked to hold on all new Green Card applications until further notice.

However, we might want to amend Rob's visa status from L1B to L1A, making it easier, faster and cheaper to process the Green Card, hopefully in the near future.

Rob was originally brought into the US in the capacity of Associate and this is why we used the L1B visa and not the L1A at that time.  Now that he is a Director, we should be able to amend his visa to L1A.  (The L1A is usually for Managers or above, or someone managing a function).

Do I have your authority to go ahead with the amendment?  The approximate cost is $1,000.

Thank you
Margaret
x51529


In fairness to Pete, we have him working on ALL the GE and ABB break out
agreements at once.

I'm going to be reviewing the ESA agreement, which is priority one because of
financing requirements.  This will be my final review of the "form" break out
contract.  We have not had a tax, insurance, accounting or finance review of
the form for ENA, and with TurborPark closing this week it may be difficult
to have completed within the next 24 hours.  However, I don't expect any big
issues, since it is so close to the original form. That being said, from the
EPC contractor's standpoint, it is so close to being done that there
shouldn't be any big issues.

Just thought I'd mention all the pieces which are still coming together.

Kay

PS.  Dale, does the LV Co Gen project involve a lease (a/k/a Enron getting
off take)?

h

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/12/2000 10:38:10 AM
To: <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: LV Cogen Agreement and Exhibits

I'll have it to you by the end of business.  I apologize for the delay,
my secretay and Chris Cobb have both been out the last two days.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 11:25 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.; Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: Re: LV Cogen Agreement and Exhibits

Peter:  Our EPC contractor and our prospective investor need copies of
the
final LV Cogen breakout contract.

Please let me know of the status of the final changes and e-mail me a
final
copy as soon as possible.

Thanks

Dale  (503) 803-1700

Peter:  This should answer your questions for the final breakout.
Please
make the changes and forward.

For now, let's assume that the 240 TDI number is per machine.  We can
confirm with GE on Monday.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 12/09/2000
09:07 AM ---------------------------

Bill Williams
12/08/2000 02:14 PM

To:   Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
      Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E
      Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: LV Cogen Agreement and Exhibits  (Document link: Dale G
      Rasmussen)

Dale , regarding the attachment to your e mail (Peter Thompson to Kay
Mann...)
My input is the following:

1.  Opening Paragraph..... Address is (or should be)

     3WTC0306
     121 SW Salmon Street
     Portland,  OR 97204

2.   Section 6.7.1  - The sentence should end with "this Agreement."  (
See
definitions)

3.   Section 6.7.2 - Address same as above.  Fax is 503-464-3740.  Attn:
Should be Jody Blackburn

4.  Information regarding notices in sections 25.1/25.3

     25.1 - again -      3WTC0306
                         121 SW Salmon Street
               Portland, OR   97204
               Attn:     Jody Blackburn
               Fax: 503-464-3740

     25.3      Same as above (25.1) except:
               Attn:     W. J. Williams Jr.

Comments regarding To Finalize the Exhibits...

1. Do you need anything in Section B of (Schedule) Exhibit A-17...Answer
is
no.  Reason: These gas turbines will not burn liquid fuel.  They do not
have the provision or physical means to do so as procured under this
contract.

2. Exhibit B-1 (Specification)....somewhat confusing as under West LB,
B-1
seemed near identical to Exhibit B.  The West LB original has
introductory
language that says the GTs are designed to operate ion simple cycle
mode....standard stuff I'm sure, but as this is a break out contract for
Las Vegas, our gas turbines will operate in combined cycle.  Not a big
deal, and it is true I'm sure the machines were designed and built to
operate in simple cycle.

I'd suggest you ask GE to confirm the West LB original spec under
Exhibit
B-1 is correct.  If yes, incorporate it.

Exhibit H-2 - Training... GE provided a Training tab and material during
the ODM September 19th, 2000 in Jacintoport.
It goes into a lot of detail, but could be incorporated therein.  Also,
Exhibit B-1 of the West LB addresses training.

Exhibit R - Witness Test Points...No feed back from me here. I have been
told GE no longer test fires their AEOD Gas Turbines prior to shipping
from
Cincinnati or once in the package at Jacintoport.  We would like to be
notified and witness as a minimum, test firings.  Eric or Chris Booth of
ENA may be able to suggest other points.

Exhibit T - My copy says Not Used.....

One last point.  I do not see 240 hours of TDI referenced in the Scope.
That is in the West LB contract.  It should be here as well.
Clarification.  Is it 240 hours per machine? Do we get the multiple? (X
4?).

Cheers

Bill Williams
Director - Restructuring and Technical Analysis - Portland
(503-464-8958)


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 09:06 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	03/23/2001 08:22 AM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-104) MARGIN RATE CHANGE FOR MIDDLE EAST SOUR CRUDE OIL FUTURES
CONTRACTS

Notice No. 01-104
March 23, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
MARGIN RATE CHANGE FOR MIDDLE EAST SOUR CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACTS

Effective Date:  Friday, March 23, 2001 (close of business)
Futures Contract: Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures
Contract Months: All Months
Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Margins for Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures Contracts

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): Old:  $2,500 New:  $1,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old:  $2,750 New:  $1,650
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old:  $3,375 New:  $2,025

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures Contracts.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-104)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	PRC Reviews

Date:		2/2/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:35 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Transwestern's average deliveries (through Thursday) to California were 1138 MMBtu/d (104%) with San Juan lateral throughput at 830 MMBtu/d and Rio Puerco at 48 MMBtu/d.  Total east deliveries averaged 73 MMBtu/d.

El Paso's deliveries to California were 2292 MMBtu/d (78%) :
- PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 627 MMBtu/d (55%)
- SoCalEhr, capacity of 1251 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 1130 MMBtu/d (90%)
- SoCalTop, capacity of 540 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 535 MMBtu/d (99%)

Thursday's posted Gas Daily prices:
	SoCal gas, large pkgs	 36.79
	PG&E, large pkgs	 12.275 (from Wednesday)
	TW San Juan		    n/a
	TW Permian		    5.91

Thursday's Enron Online bases:
		Mar		Apr		May		Jun		Jul-Sep		Oct
Perm-CA	9.07		3.795		2.595		2.595		3.295		1.895
SJ - CA		9.32		4.165		3.065		3.04		3.75		2.33
SJ-Waha	  .14 		  .335		  .435		  .41   		  .42		  .40
Perm-Waha	  .11		  .035		  .035  		  .035		  .035	                  .035


Sorry , I have not given you feedback earlier but I've been on vacation.
Randy continues to do an excellent job.  He anticipates questions and usually
has the answers.  He is a very dedicated employee and continues to expand on
his knowledge base.  He has helped the traders trade the permian and waha
points on a daily basis and such commercial experience has proven to be very
valuable regarding looking for alternatives to move gas.  The only area for
improvement that I might suggest would be to challenge others or state his
opinion if he has a different opinion from others rather than not say
anything or go along with the status quo.  He tends to want to be
nonconfrontational which is not a bad thing but this is a tough environment
and he could get run over if he does not state his opinion.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2001 05:07
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/05/2001 04:39 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, john.cody@csfb.com, kwiemer@milbank.com,
Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: CA Development

Attached are drafts of the documents to effect the transfer of two GE
turbines and one ABB transformer to CAED I and CAED II.  The dates and
amounts are bracketed, as pending the determination of the closing date.  We
will need sets for both CAED I and CAED II, with II receiving the
transformer.  These will be prepared with the forms are agreed.

These documents are subject to internal Enron review, but in the interest of
time I am sending the documents to everyone.

Thank you,

Kay


???????
?
??? ??? Dear  Vince:
?
??? ??? Thank you for  the invitation yesterday. It was a pleasure to meet
you all and learn more about  the group, it's structure and to some extent
what you are involved in. Please  extend my thanks to all of them.
?
??? ??? I am  particularly interested in the Credit Swap trading platform
that Enron has  recently started. Such a platform will provide unique
visibility into the Credit  markets. As you suggested I tried to learn more
about this from Tanya.?I  would like to learn more and if possible meet other
people more directly linked  to the effort.
?
??? ??? Just simple  instruments like Credit Swaps will require serious
modelling capability for the  pricing and the hedging of these apparently
simple intruments. The market  visibility I mention above can be explored
through Credit Derivatives Trading  successfully if Enron possesses superior
(vis a vis Morgan Stanley, Salomon  Smith Barney, Chase Manhatan,
etc.)?modelling technology in Credit  Derivatives. I can and would like
to?consider the possibility of doing this  for Enron. I would like to help
develop and participate in putting together that  business.
?
??? ??? As I  mentioned to you I have done some work in Credit Derivatives
and am deeply  familiar with virtually all the work of the principal
academics in Credit  Derivatives namely: Duffie, Lando, Tuffano, Duffee, Das,
Lelland, etc. I have  read carefully most of their work (published as well as
working papers) on the  subject to date.
?
??? ??? I look  forward to hearing from you.
?
??? ??? Best  regards
?
??? ???  Joao


BLOOMBERG

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deals:

1) Enron sells to Tractebal 25mw Palo Verde for 3/26 peak hrs at $260.00
2) Enron sells to Pacificorp 25 mw Palo Verde for 3/26 peak hrs at $260.00

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following deal:

1) Enron sells to Idaho Power 50 mw April Mid-C peak hrs at $358.00

Jeff Richter
deal 559010
Bloomberg shows $160 as price......enpower has $165.00

PREBON
All were o.k.

AMEREX

Tom Alonso/Matt Motley (someone who traded on the LT PV Desk today)
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys Cal'02 Palo Verde at $140.00  (Check the mw on this deal please
with Tom!!!)


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001
03:15 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
11/27/2000 11:03 AM
To: jfleming@rice.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, westbro@rice.edu
Subject: Course outlines

Jeff,

I am sending you a draft of the outline  of the course on energy derivatives.
I would  appreciate your comments before I finalize it.

By the way, did we agree on the time schedule for the class?
Tuesday or Thursday evening would work for me.

Vince


Sara:
What we have negotiated with Southern was limited to financial trades done
under the ISDA.  This was a form that they sent to us that we revised.  It
was my understanding that they were going to contact Leslie separately about
EPMI physical trades and Stacy about physical gas trades.
Carol.


15 mins w/McClellan - pls call him - Subject:  He said, "It's the same old thing."


More info for your file and use.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 08:05
AM ---------------------------

Eric Boyt
11/29/2000 03:57 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Thanks.  Attached is the official GE numbers.  Hopefully they match up.....

Eric

Kay Mann
11/29/2000 12:46 PM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Here's how the numbers are being handled in another LM deal.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000 12:46
PM ---------------------------

Tracee Bersani@ECT
11/28/2000 03:26 PM
To: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Here it is.

Regards
Tracee

From: Cheryl Lipshutz on 11/28/2000 03:24 PM
To: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Tracee,
Aren't there 8 LM 6000 turbines?  If so, do you have the serial numbers to
the last two ones?

	Tracee Bersani
	11/28/2000 02:59 PM

		 To: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Turbine Serial Numbers for UCC filing

Rob/Kay,
As discussed in today's meeting, I have the turbine serial numbers for you:

1.  LM 6000 Serial numbers:

Regards,
Tracee
713-345-5688


Natural Gas Risk Management requests and increase to 45 Million from 40
Million  to increase our gas fixed price position (long) until Tuesday
morning (August 8th).

Thanks

John


Joe,  of course, I'll ask Cathy to set up a time for a call.  I hope all is
well.  Things are crazy here,  crazy but great.
mike

Joseph P Hirl@ENRON
08/06/2000 09:03 PM
To: Mike McConnell
cc:
Subject: Catch up

With all of your new responsibilities, is it possible we could set  a time to
catch up.  As I mentioned in the voice mail... is this new org change
responsible for the recent stock price runup?? :)

Joe


Hey,

Here is the game..finally. You'll have to mess around with it and figure out
how it works, but here it is.


Richard:

Kathy continued with day 2 of Nolan's deposition.? She will conclude tomorrow
and will be followed by M. Swartz and Corey Gorden from Robins, Kaplan.? Tom
Hatch is apparently preparing for Aron Izower's (White & Case) deposition on
Friday in New York.? Some of the defense counsel (in particular Michael
Tomaino) have taken the position that if Nolan is still being deposed on
Friday, they want Izower's deposition rescheduled.? Plaintiffs' counsel are
holding firm but agreed to revisit the issue as we get closer to Friday.

Highlights of day 2:

-- Nolan spent the bulk of the day discussing the numerous problems with the
quality of the steel being produced during the time he visited the plant
(April-June '98 timeframe).? Quality problems included oxidation,
carbonization, edge cracks from too much copper, and coil breaks from too
much heat.

--Nolan continued his description of the plant's engineering and mechanical
problems

--Nolan indicated that he was aware that NSM spent approx. $50 million to
purchase scrap metal that was very poor quality (Nolan blamed the
incompetence of NSM's manager Wolfgang Lentz)

--There wasn't much mention of Barth or McConville today.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  tmalz18@bayland.net
Date:  Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:19:56 -0600
Subject:  You can even use Password.
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound BAT Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'password.bat'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


Energy Committee Members:

We have been offered an opportunity to benefit from a unique federal funding
program.  Sure Power has been funded to implement distributed generation
(DG) into a high-availability, energy-intensive application in the data
communications industry (i.e. telecom hotel, financial processing center,
internet data center, etc.).  As you know, Sure Power is the world's leading
supplier of DG-based systems providing six 9's availability (certified by
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology).  Sure Power's patented
technology eliminates interconnection issues with the utility, which has
been one of the technical inhibitors to widespread adoption of DG.

Sure Power has already aligned themselves with EPRI to assist them with
measurement and analysis, but are looking for a partner who has a potential
project on the horizon that could benefit from Sure Power's technology and
federal funding assistance (as much as $3M).  Please note, the project does
not have to be past the internal approval stage to benefit.  Even a
potential project that is still being analyzed for viability could receive
funding for an initial feasibility study.  Understanding that the high-tech
industry is going through trying times, and that many projects have been put
on hold; Sure Power has a three-year window in which to apply the funds, so
even a project that may not start for eighteen months would work.

The deadline in which to finalize their project package is September 12, so
Sure Power would need to have a response from a potential partner no later
than COB Tuesday September 4.  Feel free to contact Sure Power directly with
any questions.

Whit Allen
Vice President
Sure Power Corporation
+1 (203) 790-8996 TEL

whitallen@hi-availability.com

http://www.hi-availability.com


The December General Counsel's luncheon hosted by Jordan Mintz,  scheduled
per below:

Day/Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2000
Time:  11:45 a.m.
Place:  Daily Review Cafe
  3412 W. Lamar
Phone: 713-520-9217

Thank you,
Darlene Forsyth
x37254


Nothing from Legal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lambert, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Moran, Tom; Jones, Tana
Cc:	Lebrocq, Wendi; Yancey, Reginald
Subject:	Monthly Global Status Meeting

Please let me know if there are any EnronOnline trading-related matters you would like Global to address at our monthly status meeting tomorrow morning.  We would like to know if you have any feedback for us, if there is anything you wish we were doing differently, or if there is anything from the Credit and Legal departments that we should know.

We will be meeting at 10:00 a.m. in ECN 791 and, as always, you are welcome to attend -- even if only for a few minutes.

Thanks,
Karen
x3-0605


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 02:35 PM -----

	"Carol Hudson" <carol@iepa.com> 07/27/2001 02:18 PM Please respond to carol 	   To: "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "John G. Larrea \(E-mail\)" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Kate Castillo \(E-mail\)" <CCastillo@RioBravo-GM.com>, "'Mike Jines'" <mjines@reliant.com>, "Nam Nguyen \(E-mail\)" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Roger Pelote \(E-mail\)" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Scott Sadler \(E-mail\)" <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "'Sheryl Gussett'" <sgussett@reliant.com>, "Thomas R. McMorrow \(E-mail\)" <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka \(E-mail\)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Woods \(E-mail\)'" <billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery \(E-mail\)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Gates \(E-mail\)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker \(E-mail\)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Charles Linthicum \(E-mail\)" <charles.linthicum@powersrc.com>, "'Cody Carter \(E-mail\)'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton \(E-mail\)'" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler \(E-mail\)'" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin \(E-mail\)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Douglas Kerner \(E-mail\)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "'Duane Nelsen \(E-mail\)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo \(E-mail\)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch \(E-mail\)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman \(E-mail\)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa \(E-mail\)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "'Greg Blue \(E-mail\)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap Boyd \(E-mail\)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack \(E-mail\)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim Willey \(E-mail\)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco \(E-mail\)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall \(E-mail\)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd \(E-mail\)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman \(E-mail\)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett \(E-mail\)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky \(E-mail\)'" <lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "Mark Fillinger \(E-mail\)" <mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Marty McFadden \(E-mail\)" <mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Paul Desrochers \(E-mail\)" <nevedap@msn.com>, "Paula Soos \(E-mail\)" <PSoos@CovantaEnergy.com>, "'Randy Hickok \(E-mail\)'" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "'Ross Ain \(E-mail\)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Stephanie Newell \(E-mail\)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Iliff \(E-mail\)" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder \(E-mail\)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)'" <smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel \(E-mail\)" <tonywetzel@home.com>, "William Carlson \(E-mail\)" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "William Hall \(E-mail\)" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Carol Hudson \(E-mail\)" <carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Sandra Moseley \(E-mail\)" <sandra@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>  cc:   Subject: FW: IEP Legislative Report (07/26/01)

Dear All,

Attached is this week's legislative report for IEP.

Despite the summer break, leaders in the Assembly planned to call back their
side of the Legislature to debate and vote on a "rescue" plan for Southern
California Edison. The new effort was outlined in our Tuesday fax to each of
you.  In short, the new plan called for amending SB 78xx and AB 82xx to,
among other things, provide for a dedicated rate component to support a $2.9
billion bond financing by Edison, but would have prevented Edison from using
the funds to pay generators, PX and ISO invoices, directly or indirectly.
The $2.9 billion could be used to pay QFs.  The dedicated rate component for
repayment of the bonds would apply to all consumers for two years, and then
apply solely to non-core customers.  Additionally, under the plan, the 30%
haircut/trust account concept was deleted, the decision on a transmission
line purchase was deferred to settlement discussions between the state and
Edison, the RPS targeted a 10% growth in new generating capacity through
2010, and direct access would be permitted under certain circumstances
effective no earlier than January 1, 2002.  The Assembly leadership planned
on holding an informational meeting on the new plan on Thursday, July 26 and
committee and floor votes on the plan today, Friday, July 27.  However, the
leadership could not garner enough votes for this new plan this week, so no
informational hearing was held, nor will any votes be held today.  Even if
this new plan had been approved by the Assembly this week, Senator Burton's
office made it very clear that Senator Burton had no intention of bringing
his house back in to session to vote on the measure.  Accordingly, barring
the governor calling the legislature back into session, we do not expect any
other activity on this new plan before the legislature reconvenes on August
20, and perhaps not then either.

Other events this week include:

*	In Thursday's Los Angeles Times, S. David Freeman -- Governor Davis'
primary negotiator on the long-term contract deals -- authored an editorial
arguing that the state's long-term energy contracts were a primary factor in
the recent reduction in energy prices on the spot market.  You can find the
article at www.latimes.com.  It ran on the editorial page on Thursday, July
26.

*	It is our understanding that on Thursday Senator Byron Sher had
draft amendments prepared by his staff to amend SB 532 to address Renewable
Portfolio Standards issues.  The amendments are not yet public, but we are
hopeful that we will be able to obtain them when his staff returns next
week.  We will keep you apprised.

*	FERC ordered hearings on Wednesday to determine how much money
electric generators owe California for wholesale power overcharges.  With
California still insisting that it is owed $8.9 billion by generators, the
expected FERC decision on the refund amount is certain to fall short of the
state's expectations.  Lawsuits are expected to follow issuance of the
decision.  In a press statement earlier this week, the governor stated his
hopes that California will receive all $8.9 billion adding, "As for the
energy profiteers and pirates, let me make clear that I will not rest until
every dollar gouged from California businesses and residents returns to
California. If the FERC does not make California whole, we will see you in
court."

*	U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham unveiled a plan on Monday that
would expand California's power grid along Path 15 by attracting private
investment to cover the $300 million project.  He hopes by increasing the
transmission capacity by 1,500 MWs, this plan would alleviate the
"transmission bottleneck" that has proved "simply insufficient" for power to
flow freely throughout the state during times of peak usage.

*	According to Senator Dunn, Morgan Stanley destroyed key documents
"years ago" relating to the purchase of California power plants despite the
financial company's repeated promises to the Senate Select Committee to
Investigate Market Manipulation that they would turn them over, as reported
on Monday.  Meanwhile, the committee continued to move forward with their
contempt proceedings against Enron and Reliant for refusing to hand over key
documents to the committee.

*	Reliant Energy sued California on Monday, claiming "just
compensation" for the state's failure to adequately pay for long-term power
contracts that the governor seized from the Power Exchange in February.  The
state claims those contracts equal about $160 million while Reliant
calculates that the same contracts are worth more than $300 million.  A
judge is expected to oversee this dispute.

Best regards,
Tom McMorrow and Mike Martinez

 <<IEPA Legislative Report.DOC>>

 - IEPA Legislative Report (5).DOC


Raimund and John,

Attached are the Transco Z3 and 4 mid curves (indicative only).  Please let
me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Thanks.

John


Thanks, I think we turned a corner yesterday, but I also half expect the desk
to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Oregon had a late surge for Gore yesterday and he is up 7500 votes.  It will
tighten, but I think Gore may pull it out after all.  Damn that Ralph....

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	11/10/00 08:53 AM

		 To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Just talked to Sue re: yesterday's meeting and before I shoot myself in the
head, I just wanted to say it's been great working with  you guys.
Unbelievable....   In any case, congratulations.  Sounds like, all in all, it
was a good meeting.

Scott:  has Oregon figured out who they voted for yet?


Attached please find referenced list,   Again, no physical power approved for
U.S. counterparties until further notice.


Dennis:  Please remove the ROFR flag from 2 PG&E contracts,  25841 & 26511 per Paul Y'barbo.  In addition, amend the Red Rock expansion contract as indicated in red below.  PPL and Calpine now have their Red Rock expansion receipt volumes locked up in the West Texas area.  No more changes until the expansion is in service.

Thanks
PT  3-0667

	Adm cr# 27698
2/5/2002			POI's	58646	58647	58649	78093
				WTX	PH	Agave	EPFS/Eddy
	6/1/2002	6/30/2002		42434	53300	15000	9266
	7/1/2002	10/31/2002		82434	13300	15000	9266
	11/1/2002	2/28/2003		82434	13300	15000	9266
	3/1/2003	5/31/2003		82434	13300	15000	9266
	6/1/2003	3/31/2004		83729	15300	15000	5971
	4/1/2004	5/31/2017		78729	20300	15000	5971
	6/1/2017	6/30/2017		76029	23000	15000	5971
	7/1/2017	12/31/2999		36029	63000	15000	5971


Need to co-ordinate with Greg Piper and Brad Richter

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Terminated Employees

Louise -

The following individuals will be returning to work tomorrow.

Zach Morning
Linden Chiu
Cecil John
Stephen Matthew
Karen O'Day
Mark Fillinger

Although Amelia is marked for termination in our global system, apparantly, she never left.  I will make sure that this gets updated.

A message has been left for Lydia - as soon as I hear back, I will let you know.

Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:	RE: Terminated Employees

Please get the following back
Immediate
Webb	-	Zach Moring			ENW - Corporate Systems (is this the correct person - the spreadsheet just had Zach M and this is the only person I could find)
Webb	-	Linden Chiu			ENW - ENA Front Office and Risk Systems
Hall		-	Amelia Cavazos			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Gas Support
Piper	-	Lydia Cannon			Enron Online
Piper 	- 	Cecil John			Enron Online
Piper	-	Stephen Matthew		Enron Online
Piper	-	Karen O'Day			Enron Online
 Belden	-	Mark Fillinger			West Development - San Francisco

[Kitchen, Louise]
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:28 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Terminated Employees

Louise -

The following employees are showing either an immediate or future termination indicator.

Immediate
Zach Moring			ENW - Corporate Systems (is this the correct person - the spreadsheet just had Zach M and this is the only person I could find)
Linden Chiu			ENW - ENA Front Office and Risk Systems
Deidre McCaffrey		EGM-EFM Forward Trading
Peter Bennett			ENA Compression Services
Amelia Cavazos			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Gas Support
Lydia Cannon			Enron Online
Cecil John			Enron Online
Stephen Matthew		Enron Online
Karen O'Day			Enron Online
Mark Fillinger			West Development - San Francisco

Future
Israel Estrada			ENW - Energy Ops Power Risk Management East
Cynthia Shoup			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Settlements
Nicholas Warner		ENW - Risk Management, Portland

If you require any additional information, please let me know.

Amy


Either the location, or the number of locations has changed on revision number 4. The hedge associated with this deal needs to be re-evaluated.


FYI

While I have been periodically giving updates on the above max rate capacity release activity, I was surprised by the magnitude of the PG&E value above max. rates.
For the 12 months ended 9/30/01 we had net cash payments to PG&E.  (approx $18 mil revenues to Cal.  + $5.6 revenue on San Juan - $28 million in above max rate capacity release activity = ($4.4) million


-----Original Message-----
From: Shively, Hunter S.
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Lewis, Andrew H.; Ruscitti, Kevin;
Donohoe, Tom; Stevens, Kelli; Mims, Patrice L.; Williams, Jason
Subject: RealMoney.com Listen Closely Natural Gas Supplies Are Telling
You Something.htm


I can play on Sunday morning this week.  My eldest daughter has a Horse Show
that I need to be at on Saturday.  Next week I could play either Saturday or
Sunday.  Please let me know.


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=255
------------------------------------------------------------


Ed,

John Malowney has requested a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for
Louisiana Pacific Corp.  In that regard, please send me a credit work sheet
in order that I may prepare same.

Thanks!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 5/11/2201 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be given to legal and
credit.


calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
07:44 AM ---------------------------

Celeste Roberts@ECT
08/29/2000 06:21 PM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)

Subject:

URGENT

The Associate and Analyst Recruiting Department will be conducting a number
of two hour workshops to review our recruiting and interview process for the
fall on-campus recruiting effort.  Critical information regarding our
on-campus interview process, revised evaluation forms and program structure
will be reviewed during these two hours sessions.

It is mandatory that all team members attend these workshops.  All team
members must attend in order to articulate and demonstrate the Enron
recruiting process.  Knowing how busy schedules are, we have made
arrangements to present these workshops in two hours sessions for a total of
40 workshops that will run during the last week of August, through the month
of September and end at mid October.

Listed below are the dates, location and times for each session.  Please
select a date and time and e-mail this information to my assistant, Dolores
Muzzy.  We can accommodate 25 participants at a time.  Dolores will take
dates and times on a first come, first serve basis.  We have scheduled enough
sessions to accommodate every member of both the Associate and Analyst
recruiting teams.

In order to participate in the recruiting process, you must attend one of
these sessions.  We will be tracking participation.  CPE credits will also be
given for attending this workshop.


Sara,

Please do not have anyone do any work on this aside from the install
agreement.  I am waiting on a ruling from London's tax group and no trading
will be done whatsoever until that point.  There is indeed a question as to
what entity our London activity will be done out of but this is already being
considered by the correct individuals herre in London.  I am waiting
anxiously for the ruling on it as it is the only thing holding up my being
able to start trading.

The reason I am setting up a desktop in London under existing documents is
that I want to begin trading as soon as I get the go ahead from tax and
legal.  In other words, I do not want to get to the point where everyone has
signed off on the structure only to be held up by technology constraints.  I
fully expect that additional documentation/agreements will be required once
we know exactly which entity we will be operating out of and have told
Instinet (as well as ITG and eventually Autex) this.

Please let me repeat: no activity will be executed on these systems until we
get a final ruling from London's tax, legal and regulatory personnel.  Please
do not have anyone do any additional work aside from signing the agreement
for the install.

Thanks and regards,
John

From: Sara Shackleton on 08/09/2000 16:46
To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Instinet Corporation

John:  I hear that you are trying to trade in the name of Enron North America
Corp. while you sit in London.  Althought both ECT Investments, Inc. and
Enron North America Corp. have agreements with Instinet Corporation, those
companies are all U.S. companies without any presence in the U.K. (those
companies do not pay U.K. taxes!)  I have asked the ENA tax lawyers to review
the implications of your proposed activity.  I will try to speak with you
Monday before things go too far.  Please provide an immediate response and
copy the tax lawyers noted above.  Thanks.  Sara


I won't be in until about 9:30 because I have to get my drug  test done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Black, Tamara Jae
Sent: Tue 2/5/2002 7:32 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:
Subject: RE: Meeting

Is this for the entire group or just the desk heads?

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Black, Tamara Jae
Subject: Meeting

Please arrange a room for an East Power Mtg at 10:00 am this morning.

Agenda:

UBS Warburg Energy Closing/Implementation
Organization/Roles
On-line products (which products and when)
Power documents (EEI and ISDA)


> ISO Market Participants:
>
> The ISO advises market participants to follow normal payment procedures as
> specified in the ISO Tariff with respect to invoices due February 22,
> 2001.
>
> The ISO intends to make payments to maintain an equitable distribution of
> November funds received to date.
>
> Phil Leiber
> Dir. Financial Planning & Treasurer
> California ISO
> 916 351-2168
> 916-351-2259 (fax)
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woertz, Byron
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 4:50 PM
> To: ISO Market Participants
> Subject: CAISO Notice - Final November Invoices
>
>  ISO Market Participants:
>
>  Final invoices for November 2000 were sent to market participants by
> the ISO on  February 14, 2001. Cash clearing is scheduled for February 22,
> 2001.
>
>  We are reviewing our current procedures, and will advise parties by
> 1pm on Wednesday February 21 of any changes to be implemented with the
> scheduled February 22, 2001 cash clearing.
>
>  Phil Leiber
>  Dir. Financial Planning & Treasurer
>  California ISO
>  916 351-2168
>  916-351-2259 (fax)


you guys off to the races or what


Dear ICAP Working Group Members,

Regarding the January 17th ICAP WG, please click on the attached
link to view the NYISO Calendar where you will see the the meeting's
Conference Call Information as well as a Link to the Meeting Materials.
http://www.nyiso.com/services/calendar.html

Regards,

Market Relations
518-356-6060

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Start Date: 4/2/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040216.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Hi!

          It's great to hear from you!  I am so happy you are back at Enron.
I would love to go to dinner with you and Cindy and catch up.  It's hard for
me to go to lunch these days due to EOL.  They bring lunch in everyday and we
generally stay in to run our products.  Just let me know when & where you two
can meet.  Maybe we can do it soon and  celebrate the upcoming  holiday
season!  Take care!

                                                      Andy


I had the same problems with this that you all do.  That is why I told
Gossett that if this is something that has to happen, then only people like
Joe Hunter and 1or 2 others should be allowed to change the c/p names ONLY.

Errol

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach @ ECT                           01/22/2001 09:39 AM

To: Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Credit Report

I don't thing that is an option.  If we give you the ability to change names
then you also have the ability to change other parts of the deals.

Dave

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bianca Ornelas @ ENRON                           01/22/2001 09:30 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report

In order for our credit exposure to be recorded correctly, our group
(Financial Confirmations) would like to be able to change c/p names for all
desks going forward.  One person will be designated to handle all changes and
an email will be sent regarding these changes daily.  Please let me know how
you feel about this?

Thanks for your time,

Bianca


Why don't you and Rahil agree on the draft ASAP and then let Rahil send it
out in draft form this Friday afternoon to all these individuals for their
review and comments.  Rahil can work with these people directly next week on
their comments.  Rahil is free from the day-to-day operations issues and has
the time to push the product menu to the EA Originators.

We can still set up an offsite to finalize, but we need to get something out
because these individuals are already out selling as we speak.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Beck, Sally
Cc: Piper, Greg; Jafry, Rahil
Subject: Re: Costs

Shukaly resigned and left.

But I assume the invitation will be extended to all of their groups so that
whoever they want can attend.

I would actually prefer that the presentation is actually circulated to the
groups on Friday rather than presented as we will wait forever on getting an
offsite together.  How about circulating the presentation and then letting
them refer all questions to Rahil - see how much interest you get.  One on
ones are much better and I think this is how Rahil should proceed.  We need
to get in front of customers in the next couple of weeks.

Let's aim to get a least three customers this quarter.

Louise

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  Sally Beck
     04/04/2001 07:08 PM

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Piper/Corp/Enron

Subject: Re: Costs

Rahil is working with me on a presentation that covers what our services are,
the creation of a pricing desk, how that will work (process and revenue
sharing), selling of services for others, our operations pricing model, the
DASH process, key contacts in operations, etc.  I expect to review a draft by
this Friday.  Tomorrow we will have the date set for such a meeting.  We are
checking travel schedules for Laura Luce and Max Y. to see if we can catch
both in Houston sometime next week.  Greg Piper suggests a meeting with all
origination heads at once (a mini offsite).  We will do that if we can set a
date that works for a majority.  If that doesn't work, we will simply do
one-on-ones over the next ten days to get everyone.  Targeted attendees are:

Gas   Frank Vickers (East)
   Laura Luce (Central)
   Barry Tycholiz (West)

Derivatives  Fred LaGrasta

Power  Dave Duran
   Ozzie Pagan
   Ed Baughman

Portland  Chris Calger

Calgary  Ladain

Mexico  Max Y.

When you and I met we discussed most of these names.  I added the Calgary guy
and Max.  I also want to share this info with Bob Shults and his EOL
marketing team.  They talk with a lot of customers and may have the
opportunity to bring up our services as well.  We have spent some time with
Jean Mrha and John Grass, and will share the presentation with them as well.

Do you want to add any names?   If we do wind up with one date that will work
for most, I will let you know that tomorrow so that you can attend if you
would like.  --Sally

Louise Kitchen
04/04/2001 03:50 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Costs

Weren't we supposed to be having a meeting on costs of back office services
with the Heads of Origination?  Are we close to having this?

Thanks

Louise


The following name correction was completed in GCP today:

CP ID		FROM						TO
160982		Malik Auto Center				George Bell Trucking Ltd., dba Malik Auto Center

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT on Friday, November 30.

Thanks,

Ruby Kyser
Global Data Management
       713-345-8136
Fax 713-646-5797
ruby.kyser@enron.com


I apologize that the earlier note from our MBA Social chair didn't reach
you earlier.  I want to clarify a couple of questions and reach out to you
to participate in tonight's competition.

Evening MBA's are eligible to compete.  Tonight will be the only night to
try out.   I understand that all of you have class until around 9:30 pm.  I
will not start the competition until 9:45 pm to give you a chance to
attend.  In addition, if you miss the first set of category competitions
there will be two more throughout the night that you can jump in and tryout
for.  The following is the breakdown of how the competition will run:

1st set - Science & Art/Literature  (Starts at 9:45 pm)
2nd set - Sports & Entertainment  (Starts 5 minutes after the end of set #1)
3rd set - History & Geography (Starts 5 minutes after the end of set #2)
4th set - All Categories for top 2 runnerups in first 3 sets (Starts 5
minutes after the end of set #3)

I will ask 15 questions for each set and take the top person who answers
the most questions in the set.  The second and 3rd place finishers of each
set will then be paired in a 4th set of competition where I will ask 15
questions from all the categories.  The winner of that set will be the 4th
member of the team.

PS - Beckett's is giving us $1 off on pints of Guiness and Caffrey's.

Address again is:

Beckett's
2271 Shattuck Ave. (Between Bancroft and Kittredge)
Berkeley, CA 94704
510-647-1790

Juan


Mahonia has signed the documents.  Michael Garberding has the documents to
obtain Enron signatures.  I hope to have them later today.

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

	Soma Ghosh/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/06/2001 06:41 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Amendment to Mahonia doc

Teresa,

I'm following up on whether we had our amendment to Mahonia docs (for
rehypothecation) finally executued. I don't appear to have a copy of the
executed docs & would be grateful if you would provide them for me if they
have been executed. If not would you let me know whether Chase are still
holding the docs for signature.

Many thanks,

Soma


Kevin, I'll have a sedan from Beal's (713.731.9233) pick you up at the Four
Seasons and bring you to the facility.  Once you get inside, there will be a
check-in table - the ladies manning that table can direct you to Jeff.  Would
you like me to have the sedan stand by to tke you to the airport or another
destination following the panel (which will end between 9:30 and 9:45)?
Please advise.  Thanks, SRS

Kevin Compton <KCompton@kpcb.com> on 04/23/2001 09:51:29 AM
To: "'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Dinner Monday, April 23

It would be a HUGE help if a car could meet me at the Four Seasons (1300
Lamar Street) about 7:15.  Just let me know, otherwise I will take a cab.

Where should we meet with Jeff tomorrow at 8:15??

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Kevin Compton
Subject: RE: Dinner Monday, April 23
Importance: High

Kevin, I got your message about not being available for dinner -  no
problem.  The other panelists were arriving too late also, so the dinner
was cancelled.

I just wanted to touch base and make sure you had everything thing you need
for tomorrow morning.  I'm attaching a map to the North Shepherd facility;
it's about 10 minutes outside of downtown.  I would be happy to make
arrangements for a sedan to pick you up if you like; just let me know from
where.

The event begins with a buffet breakfast at 7:30 a.m. and your panel will
begin at 8:45 a.m.  Jeff would like to meet with you, David Arnoff  and
John Thornton around 8:15 a.m. to cover any last minute items about the
panel.
I'll be at the North Shepherd facility beginning about 2:00 p.m. CDT today,
so you can reach me on my cell phone (713.854.1426).  Do not hesitate to
call me should you have any questions or need additional information as I
will not have access to e-mail after 2:00 p.m.

Regards, SRS

(See attached file: ypomap.ppt)


Thanks - look forward to your input.  We have a meeting today to discuss comments due in El Paso's reallocation proceeding. How about we get you on the line next week.

Reagrds,

Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Cc:	Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Updates - General Updates

Will do.  Did you folks have a call today?  If you folks are going to have one every week, could we set up a standing time and call-in number?  Be happy to participate on these and any other issues.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Updates - General Updates

Jeff - I know we are a bit tardy in getting back to you. I think a good place to start would be a close review and routine updates on the following:

1. PGT Gas Accord vs. attempt to convert jurisdiction to FERC in bankruptcy proceeding. As discussed, any delay in PG&E's ability to deal with the generators on a long term basis will facilitate bypass projects into the state.

2. Socal - resurrection of GIR or any plans to open the backbone to firm, path based transportation.

3. Southern Trails battle with Socal to gain access to firm takeaway capacity on SoCal's system and developments in Socal's RLS tariff.

4. Any issues that you believe affect our commercial efforts in California.

Obviously this is a small list. I would appreciate your feedback on issues that you believe to be critical drivers.

Regards,

Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:34 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.; Miller, Stephanie; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Regulatory Updates - General Updates

Stephanie and I met with Jeff Dasovich in San Fransisco on Friday.  Jeff understands that he can play an important/strategic role in assisting ENA West Gas in understanding the regulated issues for Gas... There is no doubt that ENA has spent most of our resources in power ( and for good reason) however we need to re focus energy on gas related structures.

To facilitate this effort, Jeff has offered to focus some more of his time and effort on coordinating some of the key commercial issues related to California.  Jane and Stephanie need to create a priority list that represents West Gas issues and "Hot Button" or action items. Once created we can work with Jeff on action items.  In addition to this immediate need, Jeff will join our conference call's/meetings ( or attend where possible).  The next session I have on my calendar is Thurs Sept 5 @ 2:30.

I trust this initiative will further enhance an already effective procedure. If there are any questions, let me know.

regards,

Barry Tycholiz


Moved to the 7th.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


A copy of the final, filed answer by PGE/Sierra in response to the protests
filed in the FERC merger proceeding is attached.  Please let me know if you
have any questions or comments, or if you have trouble accessing the document.

Sarah

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

"Matthew Estes" <MESTES@skadden.com> on 05/25/2000 07:57:51 AM

 - 287821_3.wpd


Jeff:  Here's the info on the ITC hearings in the injury phase of the 201 investigation.  I plan to cover several days of the hearing, and will report back with regulatory and competitive intelligence.

Have a great Labor Day weekend!

Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arefieva, Maria
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:57 PM
To:	Steel Distribution
Subject:	International Trade Commission announces a schedule of hearings for 201 investigation

ITC today published a schedule of hearings on the injury phase of section 201 investigation.  Five public hearings were scheduled in Washington, DC, and one additional hearing will be conducted in Merillville, Indiana, located south of Gary.  The field hearing will address general conditions in the domestic steel industry and is likely to attract a lot of union labor.  The DC hearings will focus on the broad product categories with 45 minutes allotted to each specific product group (e.g., hot-rolled sheet, strip, and coils).

The schedule of the hearings is the following:

?	September 20 - carbon and alloy flat products; Washington, DC
?	September 24 - carbon and alloy long products and stainless and tool products, Washington, DC
?	September 25 - carbon and alloy long product and stainless and tool products, Washington, DC
?	September 28 - stainless and tool products, Washington, DC
?	October 1 - carbon and alloy tubular products, Washington, DC
?	October 5 - general hearing in Merillville, Indiana

Despite the requests by Canadian and Mexican embassies to conduct a separate hearing on imports from NAFTA, the Commission declined the request for a separate hearing.  Both Canadians and Mexicans are concerned that NAFTA issues will be buried in the general injury testimonies as Canadian producers, for example, would have to testify in hearings for 22 product categories.

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.


Hey, Carol!

How is everyone and everything???  I am always being asked about you, how's
the baby, etc.  I hope I haven't missed your visit to the office!  I'm just
working away (next to Dan Lyons, I might add) in my own little world.  We are
getting help soon and I don't know if Mark mentioned anything to you.  Raptor
is a "pain" and Mary has undergone trial by fire.  I am counting the days
until my vacation (to Marfa and Napa) which begins after the legal conference.

Do you recall Project Marlin?  I think Lance was involved.  My memory is
really bad if I worked on this deal.  There's nothing in Lotus Notes
(rats!).

Take care (I'm starting to sound like David Mitchell).

Sara


check with Oxley


For the Mavrix contract ending 10/31/2003...do not give Right of First Refusal.  Thanks!


Comments due 1/1/01.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
03:24 PM ---------------------------

"Richard B. Bulman" <rb.bulman@mapp.org>@mapp.org on 11/20/2000 04:28:54 PM
Sent by: owner-mc@mapp.org
To: <mc@mapp.org>
cc:

Subject: DOE Notice of Inquiry Regarding Mandatory Electric Reliability
Standards

FYI

Please be advised that the DOE has  issued its anticipated Notice of Inquiry
(NOI) seeking comments on whether to  initiate a rulemaking to have the FERC
impose mandatory electric reliability  standards.??? DOE is seeking responses
to the seven specific  questions included in the attached 2-page Notice by
January 4,  2001.
?
Rich  Bulman
 - doe_reliab_noi_112000.pdf


The Legal/Credit meeting scheduled for tomorrow has been postponed 1/2 hour
until 2:30 pm.


If your in Houston on April 1st, we're having an NCAA Basketball Tournament
Party.  Invitation attached.

Thank You,
TradeSpark

 <<NCAA Party Invitation.jpg>>

CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of Tradespark, Inc.
     E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
     Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check all e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s).

For further important information, please see http://www.tradespark.com/full-disclaimer.html


Jeff, when you get the description, just go to the bottom of the page and hit
continue, then your election form will appear and when you get to the bottom
of that form, click accept and then you will be able to print your
confirmation statement.  Also, if you prefer to print the form before
entering your information, you can do so from the bottom of the page.
Sometimes people, for whatever reason, can't see the whole screen, so they
can't see the buttons "I Accept"  or "Continue" or "Print" and then they have
to go to the display settings if maximizing the screen doesn't help.  Let me
know if none of this works for you or you can call me at 713-853-5878 and
I'll walk you through it.

Thanks.

Mary

From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/05/2000 10:10 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Mary Lessor/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vacation, Sweet Vacation

Hi Mary:
Well, the problem is likely just that I'm dense.  I log in, click on deferral
and find a description of what one needs to do (i.e., fill out the form), but
I've surfed around the site a bit and can't seem to find the form.  Am I
(probably) missing something?  Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff