Some high profile CEOs question the value of e-marketplaces in the latest
issue of Fortune. Herein, Giga Research (somewhat) agrees with the
sentiment. Bottom line = the hype is over, and now we need to be rigorous in
measuring the market opportunity here, if we intend to commit engineering,
marketing, and sales resources...

Does this confirm the company sponsored exchange belief? (I'm making the
distincction here between company, industry, and neutral)

Aiaz

Read the full article
"The Odd Couple," Fortune, May 1, 2000
http://www.fortune.com/fortune/2000/05/01/wel.html

Relevant piece follows...

 Question

Are all CEOs convinced of the value of e-marketplaces?

 Answer

In a wide-ranging interview on Internet issues in Fortune, General Electric
CEO Jack Welch and Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy both voiced doubts
about the value of e-marketplaces. According to the interview, their primary
concern is allowing another entity to enter the value chain between them and
their customers and suppliers. McNealy is quoted as saying, "the question
is, do companies want to outsource purchasing and control over their own
supply-and-demand curves, and thereby put another layer between themselves
and their customers?" When asked why the automotive and aerospace industries
are creating purchasing exchanges for the key parts and components for their
businesses, Welch answered, "some of us older companies think this Internet
stuff is more difficult than it really is." He went on to say that it "makes
no sense" to hand the responsibility for creating business-to-business
platforms and services to another organization.

Giga Position

These are not the ramblings of out-of-touch, "stuck in the mud" executives.
McNealy is a highly visible Internet CEO and evangelist who has been
preaching the value that the Internet can bring to businesses for years, and
we have previously identified Welch as a CEO who "gets it" due to his
efforts to jump-start GE's internal usage of Internet technology (see
IdeaByte, B2B E-Business Strategy Requires CEO Support, Ken Vollmer). As
these two executives have a solid track record when it comes to Internet
issues, we believe their comments may cause some companies to question their
B2B strategies if they focus solely on Net marketplace options.

We do believe that there are good business reasons for organizations to use
e-marketplaces (see Planning Assumption, E-Markets: A Natural Evolution of
E-Procurement, Erica Rugullies). However, these efforts should not be
pursued to the exclusion of other B2B integration options that do not
involve a third party. In particular, business process integration (BPI)
projects may have a higher potential for improving business operations,
internal productivity and customer satisfaction (see IdeaByte, B2B
E-Business Strategy Options: A Road Less Traveled, Ken Vollmer, and Planning
Assumption, Business Process Integration: A Key Component of B2B E-Business
Strategy, Ken Vollmer).

Recommendations

Organizations must not assume that an e-marketplace joint venture will
necessarily be the best (or only) way to implement Internet-based technology
improvements in their organizations. Clients should consider the pros and
cons of both e-marketplaces and BPI when developing their e-business
strategy.

_____


Here's the info you requested regarding office furniture.

Joya' F. Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

----- Forwarded by Joya Davis/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:15 AM -----

	Reggie Wilson
	07/10/2000 08:32 AM

		 To: Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Private Office Pricing

Joya,
Here's a break down of the Wooden Private Office "E" station (Cherry Wood)
vs. the Laminate Private Office "E" station (Off white laminate). All quotes
are approximate and based on reusing our existing inventory, if available.
Lead-time for both is approximately 3-5 weeks based on quantities.

Wooden Private Office "E" Station = $2100. each

Laminate Private Office "E" Station = $750. each

Feel free to call me if there are questions.

Thanks,
Reggie


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 07:19 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	05/15/2001 05:59 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald
<Michael.McDonald@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>,
Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>,
Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen
Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>, Ken Smith
<ken@kdscommunications.com>, Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>,
Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com>, Mary Schoen
<Mary.Schoen@enron.com>, David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ferc/Republicans

Attached, please find the following press releases from Governor Davis:

1) Governor Davis wrote a letter to FERC regarding the QFs.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0148135597.0989967115@@@@&BV_EngineID=galkllhdjdebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_05/20010515_PR01215_GGD_lette
r_to_FERC.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+DAVIS+SENDS+LETTER+TO+FERC+5%2f15%2f01&iOID=147
70

2) Governor Davis blames Republicans for Moodys downgrade.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0148135597.0989967115@@@@&BV_EngineID=galkllhdjdebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_05/20010515_PR01219_Moodys_cr
edit_rating.html&sTitle=GOP+OBSTRUCTION+LEADS+TO+CALIFORNIA+%0aCREDIT+DOWNGRAD
E%0a&iOID=14750


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's       Interest Rates   US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%       [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  Japanese Forex Trading Preview  February 25, 7:00 PM: EUR/$..0.8693 $/JPY..133.83 GBP/$..1.4253 $/CHF..1.6972  Japanese Forex Trading Preview  by Darko Pavlovic  No key data.   The yen retained the upper hand against the dollar around 133.80, boosted by Japan's trade surplus that came in above 118 billion yen in January, whereas its surplus with the US rose for the first time in 10 months by 14.9% y/y to 524.8 bln yen. The latest data is to suggest that increasing US demand and weaker yen levels could benefit Japanese exports. In addition, Japanese currency found strength as a result of repatriation flows before the fiscal year ends in March. Latest report show that anti deflationary package due on Wednesday will be a two part plan: the government will provide for measures to stabilize stock market and ask the BoJ for more easing. The second more important part of the plan will likely be revealed at the end of March and will outline tax changes and tackling the bad loans debt. Thursday meeting of the BoJ is not likely to produce any rate cut although that question remains open. If the central bank does not ease monetary policy, the yen could weaken as traders express their disappointment by unloading the currency. However, if the BoJ does inject liquidity by raising its purchases of government bonds, the yen is also likely to weaken. Markets will scrutinize news conferences from Financial Minister Shiokawa, Economic Minister Takenaka and Financial Services Minister Yanagisawa. Japan's Fin Services Minister Yanagisawa was not considering new steps on bad loans in anti-deflation package. Yanagisawa explained that he had not received report on Bank report steps for Daiei According to a telephone survey released Monday by Tokyo's TV 12 the support rate for the cabinet of PM Koizumi fell to 48.4%, the first time it has fallen below 50% since it took office last April. The approval rating now stands below the 55.6% the cabinet received in the previous survey conducted in late January, immediately after Koizumi fired Foreign Minister Tanaka. Support holds at 133.20, 133.0 and 132.50. Upside capped at 134.0, 134.40 and 134.90.   EUR/USD is trading around just below 87 cents weighed by an unofficially released German jobless count for February showing a 30,000 rise to 4.32 mln, along with the news that Germany's cartel office blocked Deutsche Telekom's planned sale of its cable assets to US media group Liberty Media in a deal worth $4.81 billion. Investors are undoubtedly concerned about funneling their assets into a highly regulated European region. In mid-morning, the euro's slide was temporarily reversed as markets reacted to a fall in Germany preliminary CPI to 0.3% m/m from 0.9% or to 1.7% y/y from the previous 2.1%. German preliminary harmonised CPI also dipped to 0.3% m/m from the previous 1.0%, or to 1.9% y/y from the previous 2.3%. The Statistics office cited drops in heating oil and fuel prices as the primary reasons behind February's fall in inflation, which sparked hope that the European Central Bank would be able to lower interest rates.Nonetheless, the single currency was unable to find comfort in European Central Bank president Duisenberg's optimism that the world economy would rebound modestly, and that the Eurozone would grow close to its long-term trend between 2-2.5% by the end of the year. Markets now await tomorrow's release of the German Ifo business sentiment survey that is forecasted to rise to 87.3 in February from the previous 86.3, reflecting the improvement seen in the ZEW sentiment survey. Support is seen at 86.80, 86.45/50 and 86.10. Resistance is viewed at 87.85, 88.10 and the 200-day moving average at 88.50.  Tomorrow morning's release of the US Conference Board consumer confidence index is forecasted to slip to 96.8 in February from the previous 97.3, mirroring the decline in the University of Michigan survey. However, some analysts anticipate the index will edge up slightly because the U. Michigan survey places more weight on stock prices, which have fallen recently on accounting concerns. This week's other key US indicators include durable goods, new home sales, jobless claims, GDP, Chicago Purchasing Managers Index, personal income and consumption, University of Michigan confidence survey, ISM (formerly NAPM) PMI. In the midst of all the economic releases, markets will be carefully listening to Fed Chairman Greenspan's semi-annual monetary policy testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday for any hint that the central bank may begin to raise interest rates sometime this year.   Major data due for release from the Eurozone comprise the German Ifo business climate indicator, French CPI, Italian foreign trade, Euroarea M3, German GDP, French INSEE industry survey, French PPI, Italian retail sales, Belgian CPI, Euroarea HICP, German PPI, French unemployment, Italy's ISAE industrial confidence survey, Italian PPI, Euroarea manufacturing PMI, Euroarea retail sales, German manufacturing PMI, French manufacturing PMI, France's INSEE household survey, Italian manufacturing PMI, Italian CPI, Italian GDP, and Spanish unemployment. Highlights from the UK are GDP, Gfk consumer confidence, nationwide house price index and the manufacturing Puchasing Managers survey. Major data releases from Japan are commercial sales, industrial production, Shoko Chukin small firm survey, housing starts, consumer prices, household survey of expenditures and the labor force survey.    	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Rally in USD, Stocks Weigh on European FX       Articles & Ideas  Will Greenspan & Data Overcome Enronitis?   Off Goes the Franc, On Comes Jospin       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		  This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .   Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information.


No memo out yet on the Doorstep process.  I am still in the throws of
completing the 13 reviews that I have to give - should be finished by 5:00.
I will send the memo on Doorstep process to you, Fernley and Michael Brown
before I leave for the day.

I will be in the Calgary office Wednesday and Thursday with Peggy Hedstrom
and her team.  Back in the Houston office on Friday.

Hope that James' visit is going well.  Thanks for getting appointments
organized for him.

I look forward to seeing you in Dallas next week.  I am glad that you,
Richard and Steve will be able to participate.  Are you still planning to
come back to Houston after the meeting in Dallas?  I fly from Dallas to
Austin on Tuesday night, so that I can do a full day of interviews at UT for
summer interns on Wednesday.  I will be back in the office on Thursday and
Friday that week.  Let me know if we can help in setting up any
appointments.  We can do lunch on Thursday or Friday, if your schedule
allows.  I can also set some time aside to perhaps download from our Dallas
meeting and to follow up on some other issues.  I would offer dinner on
Thursday night, but that is my birthday and I think (hope) that my family
will have dinner plans for me that evening.  Is there someone else in Houston
that you would like to have dinner with while you are here?   --Sally


Please let me know who handles this one.  Our power trader is Joe Wagner
(X33143) and the draft should be emailed to John Porter:  japorter@tva.gov
Joe would like an update.  John Porter will direct to a TVA lawyer.  Thanks.
Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 01:25 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	11/28/2000 11:51 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tennessee Valley Authority - ISDA Credit Worksheet

I don't know who is going to work on this one, but I just wanted to remind
you that we had that big file with lots of due diligence on the TVA...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 11:50 AM -----

	Edward Sacks@ENRON
	11/28/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Tennessee Valley Authority - ISDA Credit Worksheet

Attached please find the proposed credit terms for the ISDA Agmt.  Comments
or questions, please call.

Ed Sacks


---------------------- Forwarded by Allison Navin/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Spring" <aae@dellnet.com> on 06/07/2000 05:02:03 PM
To: "'Allison Navin \(E-mail\)'" <Allison_Navin@enron.com>, "'Anthony Foti
\(E-mail\)'" <AFOTI@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Art Brownell \(E-mail\)"
<AWBrownell@aol.com>, "'Bill Paxon \(E-mail\)'" <bpaxon@akingump.com>,
"'Cynthia Sandherr \(E-mail\)'" <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>, "David N.
Friedman \(E-mail\)" <david_friedman@afandpa.org>, "Donn Salvosa \(E-mail\)"
<DSalvosa@epsa.org>, "'Gay H. Friedmann \(E-mail\)'" <gfriedmann@ingaa.org>,
"'Gene Peters \(E-mail\)'" <gpeters@epsa.org>, "'Henry Hubbard \(E-mail\)'"
<hubbardh@fleishman.com>, "'Jamie Tucker \(E-mail\)'" <jtucker@akingump.com>,
"'Jane Turner \(E-mail\)'" <jane_turner@afandpa.org>, "'Jim McIntire
\(E-mail\)'" <jim_mcintire@cmahq.com>, "'Jim McVaney \(E-mail\)'"
<jim_mcvaney@cmahq.com>, "'John Runyan \(E-mail\)'" <john.runyan@ipaper.com>,
"'John Sparkman \(E-mail\)'" <jssparkman@papl.com>, "John Stinson \(E-mail\)"
<jmstinson@worldnet.att.net>, "'Karen Penafiel \(E-mail\)'"
<kpenafie@boma.org>, "'Katie Strong \(E-mail\)'" <kstrong@AKINGUMP.COM>,
"'Kevin O'Donovan \(E-mail\)'" <nymex1@unidial.com>, "Kim Brooks \(E-mail\)"
<kbrooks@nam.org>, "'Kim Martin \(E-mail\)'" <martinki@fleishman.com>, "'Marc
Yacker \(E-mail\)'" <myacker@elcon.org>, "'Mark L. Kemmer \(E-mail\)'"
<mark.l.kemmer@gm.com>, "'Mark Whitenton \(E-mail\)'" <mwhitenton@nam.org>,
"Nina Plaushin \(E-mail\)" <nplaushin@ppl.com>, "Paulette Pidcock \(E-mail\)"
<paulette.pidcock@pge-corp.com>, "'Steve Kline \(E-mail\)'"
<steven.kline@pge-corp.com>
cc:

Subject: Bliley transmission language

This is Chairman Bliley's "discussion draft," which he just released to the
Republican members.  Evidently, this is what he views as the essential
component of a bill, and he's invited members to build on this.  This
section contains transmission language, which clarifies that FERC has
jurisdiction over both bundled and unbundled transmission.  Bliley believes
that this language is "the start, understanding it and building on it, is
the next step."

_______________________________
Andrea Spring
Executive Director
Americans for Affordable Electricity
1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20004
phone: 202-347-6371
fax: 202-393-4637
e-mail: aspring.aae@dellnet.com

 - sectionbysection.wpd
 - summarydoc.wpd
 - 005_.PDF


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:10 PM -----

	John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/26/2001 06:23 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Govenar
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Bullet Points on EPMI Intervention in Mirant proceeding against
CAISO before FERC

Attached below is a summary of Enron Power Marketing's Motion to Intervene in
the Mirant v. CAISO proceeding before FERC.  Please let me know if you have
any questions or comments.

Thanks

John


W/David Blake @TCO gas control have approval for 20,000dth over MDIQ.
5/21/01; 3:55pm

tks
joann


Read about Enron's entry into the data storage market.

Also in this issue:
Sizing up EnronOnline's competition
Brazil's new merchant plant
EBS sponsors Sundance

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz February 2, 2001."


Still need to get with bkty lawers. Later today. Will call.  Tomorrow approval ok
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY
DAILY FEATURE
is now available on nationaljournal.com:
Click Here: http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
State Roundup: Staff Writer Liza Porteus looks at the launch of a new state
electronics recycling campaign aimed at uniting the efforts of electronics
manufacturers, recyclers, waste transporters and local, state and federal
governments.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/states/stat011025.htm

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- CONGRESS: Get The Latest Updates On Key Legislation
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/bills/billprogress.htm

-- WELL-READ WONK: Saddam's Bomb-Maker, America's Politicians
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/review/

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------
National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Sara,

I just spoke with David P.  Do you have an electronic copy that you can
forward to Dan Hyvl?

thanks
brant

Brant Reves
02/23/2001 11:14 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Glencore

Sara,

Here is a credit worksheet detailing the changes we should include in the
ISDA amendment.

Dan,

I am forwarding by interoffice mail (i do not have an electronic copy) a
physical/financial guaranty for your review.  As of now, they do not transact
with Enron in the physical markets, but they may in the future.  Please
review...

thanks
brant

Sara Shackleton
02/23/2001 09:48 AM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Glencore

ENA will review CP's form of guaranty and comment; Brant will circulate
guaranty to a physical lawyer and advise him that financial is also
reviewing.  I spoke with David Porter and we have decided to amend the ISDA
to acknowledge that all three branches can transact under the existing
Glencore Ltd. master agreement.  The use of several different corporate
designations (Ltd., SA, AG) is confusing CP's trading partners in the U.S.

Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements
database-->


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 10:20 AM -----

	Jeff Worman <jworman@academyofhealth.com>
	10/04/2000 02:54 PM
	Please respond to "jworman@academyofhealth.com"

		 To: "'Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com'" <Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

I do appriciate that not all is final and until it becomes completely final
i will stay put.  I have been looking at barn designs, I have ali the next
couple of weekends, maybe one day when things are complete I will have you
out for a tour.
jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [SMTP:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 1:36 PM
To: jworman@academyofhealth.com
Subject:

Congratulations on the farm!!!!!    I will be in the Woodlands Thursday and
part of Friday at a Legal Conference.  I would invite you to golf, but I
know you are way busy.   Let me know if I can help with the move.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

__________________

HAVE A GOOD DAY !!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Vangie,

Because of the synonymous negotiations of agreements with enovate and ENA,
Stacy Dickson will we negotiating for ENA and enovate.  Therefore, please
send any questions and or issues regarding these to her attention,  I have
given her your redline and comments.
	stacy.e.dickson@enron.com?

One final issue concerns the GISB.   Do you want to proceed with this
agreement.  If so, I will negotiate this one with you.  Please let me have
your thoughts regarding same.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


[IMAGE]

February 27, 2001

Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e012302

PROVANTAGE Customer:   jeff_dasovich@enron.com

To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)

NEW! Enhanced Shopping Cart
We've enhanced our shopping cart to show whether a line item that is added is
in stock, and how each line item that is added will be shipped to you.??Check
it out!

?

Products that give you the Professional Advantage!

[IMAGE]
MS Open License 5.0

Ensure your upgrade to Microsoft Office XP!
Purchase a Microsoftc Open License with Upgrade Advantage - or purchase
Upgrade Advantage for your existing Office or Office Open License now - and
you will automatically receive an upgrade to Microsoft Office XP upon its
release!  Avoid the rush and added expense by planning ahead!

[IMAGE]
56K Faxmodem External
By 3Com

The World Wide Web offers businesses and families a range of resources no one
could imagine only a few years ago. But to see the detailed graphics and ...
More

??$78.19
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
GLADIAC MX AGP 32MB SDRAM GeForce2 Graphics Card
By ELSA Inc

With the ELSA GLADIAC MX, ELSA offers the economical entry into the latest
generation of super-compact "low-profile" format graphics boards featuring
transform ...More

??$114.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Dreamweaver UltraDev v4.0/Fireworks v4.0
By Macromedia

Designed specifically for building data-driven Web sites, Macromedia
Dreamweaver UltraDev 4 enables you to construct ASP, JSP or ColdFusion
applications ...More

??$618.25
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
MP3 Based CD Player
By D-Link Systems

The D-Link DMP-CD100 is a MP3 based CD player that plays both CD's with MP3
files and audio CD's. It's cutting edge technology provides over 10 hours of
non-stop music in a single unit.

??$120.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Stylus Photo 1270 1440x720dpi
By Epson

Now exquisite exhibition prints, portfolios, proofs and panoramics can be
produced with far more control and convenience than a trip to the photo lab.
...More

??$375.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
ARCserve 2000 Advanced Edition
By Computer Associates

ARCserve 2000 provides complete Windows 2000 disaster recovery, and protects
key features such as Active Directory and the COM+ database. Delivers
serverless ...More

??$769.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Q75 17in/16.0v 21mm 1600x1200 69Hz TCO99
By ViewSonic

The high resolution Optiquest Q75 is the ideal 17 inch Monitor for Vibrant
Colors and Sharp, Precise Screen Viewing. Business people, Web Surfers and
Gamers ...More

??$235.23
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
CanoScan D660U Flatbed Scanner 600x1200 dpi
By Canon

Lift the cover, insert your slide or negative and press the external film
scan button. The D660U scanner, with its built-in backlight, produces
spectacular ...More

??$127.96
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Microsoft Project 2000
By Microsoft

A New Milestone in Project Management! Includes Project Central client &
server software.
Provides the flexibility needed to collaboratively ...More

UPGRADE??$162.92
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Z52 Color Jetprinter Parallel
By Lexmark

The Leading Edge in Photo Quality.

2400 x 1200 dpi resolution in both black and color
Fast! Up to 15 pages per minute black, up to 7 pages ...More

??$139.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
PlexWriter 32x/12x/10x Rewritable EIDE CD-RW
By Plextor

PlexWriter 12/10/32A comes built-in with a new technology called BURN-Proof,
eliminating buffer underrun errors. Buffer under runs occur when the source
...More

??$217.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New Version!

MKS Toolkit for Developers v7.5
By MKS

MKS Toolkit for Developers (formerly MKS Toolkit) is a Windows development
product for software, script, and Web developers, who can choose from
UNIX-style ...More

??$318.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
VT2461 2.4GHz Cordless Phone w/Call
By Vtech

$20 mail in REBATE on VTech 2431 (VTEC00Y), VTech 2461 (VTEC010), or VTech
2420 (VTEC00X) cordless phones; 2/25/01 through 4/30/01. For details ...More

??$154.83
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Label Matrix v5.0
By StrandWare

Advanced bar code label design and printing software. Supports dozens of bar
code types including all popular 2D symbologies. Includes hundreds of custom
...More

??$342.27
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
DCP-1200 3-in-1 12ppm 600dpi Copier/Color Scanner
By Brother

Features:

Up to 12 ppm printing
True 600 x 600 dpi laser output
Brother's Automatic E-mail printing Software
Built-in B&W and Color ...More

??$429.65
[IMAGE]

?
?

Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
sales@provantage.com

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog

,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?

 The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??

[IMAGE]

BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site


Could you please allow access to the books containing these post is'd 1443646, 1443647, 1443648, 1443656, 1443658, 1443660, for the following people ASAP per Phillip Love:

gcouch
crabon
pryder
ebrady
jdoan
shopkins

thanks.

Edward C. Brady
Enron Net Works
Risk Management
713.853.5209
1.800.97ENRON ext.35209


ok next tuesday or wednesday will work, e-mail me on monday. i may have to
go to NY citybut right now i have no plans.

my office number is 281-296-7080 ext.221

----- Original Message -----
From: <Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
To: Charles Costenbader <charles@capstoneenergy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 6:00 PM
Subject: Re:

>
> Charlie:
> Sorry for the delay with the e-mail, I just got back into the office from
> traveling.  We are working hard to sell these assets before year-end -
> they're a beast.  This Friday does not look good for lunch, but I think
> Tuesday or Wednesday of next week works.  I hope this works for you as
> well.  Talk to you soon.
> Regards,
> Ben
>


Susan:  this guaranty came from the lawyer.  Use this instead of the earlier
version.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 02:26 PM -----

	"Rosenblum, Gary(CICG-GEDNY)" <grosenbl@exchange.ml.com>
	06/12/2000 02:07 PM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Barna, Peter (Equity Capital Markets)" <pbarna@exchange.ml.com>
		 Subject: MLI Guarantee

 <<Doc4.doc>>

Sara,

The guarantee attached is identical to the version delivered by MLCS except
for name and date changes.

Regards

 - Doc4.doc


Congratulations from me too.? I hope you two are as happily married  as I
am.? I mean we are.? Right dear?
Regards, the Sheas
-----Original Message-----
From: Carter Hachman  [mailto:carter.hachman@marchFIRST.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001  10:27 AM
To: 'Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com'; 'Lynner@mcn.org';
'whiting@sonic.net'; 'johnw@fsgllc.com';
'ljensen@westcoastweathervanes.com';  'Eldon@direcpc.com';
'cgreenway@brobeck.com'; Shea, Chris;  'carterhachman@worldnet.att.net';
'cameron@perfect.com';  'Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com';
'PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu';  'PSellers@pacbell.net'; 'scottwl@hotmail.com';
'Csilva@jeiusa.com'; 'celise  clevenger'
Subject: Memorial Day Weekend

Cameron and Scotty sitting in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G
First comes love
Then comes  marriage
Then Prentice and Cammie stop  living together

;-)

Congratulations!? You two are fantastic!?  I'm on for the entire weekend and
will bring mucho vino -- and none from a  box.? Nancy, Triple piggy will have
to be played on the deck with no  railings.? I've been doing back exercises
and am good to go.?

Looking forward to it!

xo
Carter

Carter K. Hachman
Sr. Brand Strategist
marchFIRST/SBi
415-369-6347  work
415-846-1206 cell


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
12:08 PM ---------------------------

Colin Tonks
07/18/2000 03:42 PM
To: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: refresh page for AGA ...

To kill this page you need to kill the browser !!!

Colin

ps Chris H. did this !!!

http://nahou-entdev2k/aga/aga.html


Thanks for your help.

Clement Abrams@ENRON
05/08/2000 01:21 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Guaranty

Gerald,

Please forgive me for the delay in getting back with you on this guaranty
request.  You should be receiving the executed version today.

Clement

Gerald Nemec@ECT
04/21/2000 02:09 PM
To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Guaranty

Clement,  I had sent you a draft of a guaranty by Enron Corp. for ECS
Compression Company, L.L.C. earlier.  Have you had a chance to review and
obtain execution yet.  Please let me know the status.  Thanks for your help


well yes

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The timing for bringing in Quinn Emanuel is all wrong. We need to get through
some procedural motions and see where we are before we add a firm.

	Mark E Haedicke
	04/16/2001 04:38 PM

		 To: James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
		 cc: (bcc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: RE: California Litigation Team

Jim:  Good question.  With all that is going on the answer is yes I think.
Mark

	James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/12/2001 06:05 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: California Litigation Team

Mark, query whether Bill Urquhart of Quinn Emanuel should be included. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Elbertson, Janette   On Behalf Of Haedicke, Mark
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:46 PM
To: Bradford, William S.; Buy, Rick; mday@gmssr.com; Delainey, David; Derrick
Jr., James; cecklund@llgm.com; gfergus@brobeck.com; Hartsoe, Joe; Leff, Dan;
sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com; Kean, Steven; Kitchen, Louise; jklauberg@llgm.com;
Lavorato, John; Mellencamp, Lisa; Sanders, Richard; Shapiro, Richard; Sharp,
Vicki; Smith, Michael; Steffes, James; Tribolet, Michael; Whalley, Greg;
Williams, Robert; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
Cc: Chapman, Kay; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly; Taylor, Liz; Lopez,
Leasa; Harris, Stephanie J; Heathman, Karen K.; Sweet, Twanda; Simmons, Linda
Subject: California Litigation Team

 Starting on Thursday,  April 19, at 2:00 p.m. there will be a weekly
telephone conference for the California litigation team.  The objective will
be to identify key issues and plan a coordinated strategy for all litigation
in California.  The call will last not more than one hour.

 Thus far, the responsibility has been allocated as follows:

1. PG&E Bankruptcy   Lisa Mellencamp and Carl Ecklund (LeBoeuf Lamb Greene &
McRae)

2. Class Actions   Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs (Gibbs & Bruns)

3. CTC Matters   Bob Williams, Mike Day and Gary Fergus (Brobeck)

4. FERC Matters    Regulatory and Richard Sanders and Dan Watkiss (Bracewell
& Patterson)

5. Government Investigations Regulatory and Richard Sanders

 Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs will have overall responsibility for
coordination of the litigation.


Kate, I have done extensive research to obtain the Nymex prices that you have
requested, and I have concluded the following.
Nymex website does not show a code for Nymex MIDC contract
Nymex Palo Verde (KV), and Nymex COB (MW) do not show settlement prices for
these power contracts.
Finally, are you sure these are Nymex contracts.
I have checked the Nymex website at: http://www.nymex.com, under Markets,
Commodity Codes, Futures and Options Data,
Nymex Divisions Futures Contracts, MIDC, PV, and COB Electricity, Settlement
Data without results. Stacey White (Enpower Pub Posting),
Kimat Singla (Risks), and Jeremy Wong (IT), have no idea on the locations of
the prices  in Nymex.  Can you possibly get
with the trader that made the deal to fill us in on the location to these
prices, or if he will supply us with the prices that he wants posted?

Thanks, wlh


Tyson has gotten a call-back from the governor's office.  She's going to call
him back shortly to try to sell him on the plan (i.e., private sector to the
rescue) and ensure that he'll come to the party.  She'll call me back as soon
as she talks to him.

Curious--do we have any sense of whether there's much activity within the
adminstration on this, or can we expect the wait and see approach to continue?
Best,
Jeff


Got it!
>>> cstrother@MSHPC.COM 11/26/01 04:04PM  >>>
Before I started  having my on e-mail problems today, I told Robert Rosenberg of Slover & Loftus ((202) 347-7170; rdr@sloverandloftus.com ) that I would  see if I could successfully distribute his Wednesday Nov. 21 message and  attachments through the EL00-95 listserv.  Thus, I am giving it a  try.

However, as I look  at the attachments, one is 13 plus megs.  I will send that one  separately.  I might guess that it size is a problem, except that many  large files have made it through previously.  The file that is coming  separately is named "1121trl.pdf".

Below  is the text of his original message.  Attached are attachments hi provided  me separately, but which were supposed to go with that message.   Thanks,

"From: EL00-95 List  mailto:EL00-95@listserv.gsa.gov ] On  Behalf Of
> Robert Rosenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:27 PM
> To: EL00-95@LISTSERV.GSA.GOV
> Subject: EL00-95, public version of AEPCO's 11/6/01  filing
>
>
> Attached are the items that Arizona Electric Power  Cooperative, Inc.
> ("AEPCO"), filed today in response to Judge Birchman's  11/15 order on
> confidentiality: transmittal letter, testimony summary  (same as
> before), AEP-2 (redacted), AEP-8 (made public in its  entirety), AEP-10
> (made public in its entirety), and certificate of service.  Hardcopy
> (no
> CD) is also being mailed to the restricted service  list."

Channing

Channing D. Strother,  Jr.
McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC
2175 K Street, NW
Ste. 600
Washington, DC 20037
Phone: 202-393-5710 x  4045
Fax: 202-393-5721
E-Mail: cstrother@mshpc.com
Pager:  1-800-209-0704


The Texas desk has requested that we run the base gas roll tonight, 3/19 for
April 2001production

Thanks

GG


We will be offering 2 training classes over the next few weeks.  If you are
interested in attending either of these courses, please let me know by
Friday, April 13th.

Tricks of the Trade for Analysts in the Energy Biz
Presented by Jonathan Koomey, PhD, Staff Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley
National Lab

Date:   Wednesday, April 18th
Time:  9:00 am - 5:00 pm
Location:   To Be Determined

Course Outline:
Put facts at your fingertips:  Key references and data sources.
Understanding data:  Pitfalls in data acquisition and handling.
Introduction to back of the envelope calculations.
Summary of US and Western electricity systems.

This course is still in the trial phase and will require each participant to
provide feedback as to the course content and overall delivery.  Class size
is limited to 15 participants.

Negotiation Skills Training - Fighting Fires Without Burning Bridges
Presented by Steven Cohen, President, The Negotiation Skills Company

Date:  Tuesday, May 8th and Wednesday May 9th
Time:   9:00 am - 5:00 pm
Location: To Be Determined
Pre-Work: Questionnaire outlining your concerns about negotiation.
  Reading Getting to Yes by Roger Fisher and William Ury (provided by Enron).

Course Outline:
This workshop introduces the process of interest-based negotiation and
reinforces those skills through a carefully structured interactive program.
The training provides a group of participants with tools to increase
collaboration and reduce conflict.

Class size is limited to 18 participants.

If you have any questions regarding either program, please do not hesitate to
ask.

Thanks!
Amy


Per my conversations with Credit, the referenced counterparty is the New
Jersey incorporated sub of a German company, a liquids based counterparty,
and they are an eligible swap participant.  We do not have a master agreement
in place with them.  I am approving them for all financial trading.


Jeff, I assume you can coordinate a conference call from work.  Call me at
home:
415-388-2548.

Excellent points and I was thinking along similar lines.  Questions I have:

How do you know that LT debt gives more advantageous terms?  We have no yield
curve info nor do we know their credit rating.
At what point does their borrowing exceed their covenents?
Is our strategy to not raise the required $66million or to stop/slow PPE
spending so that the $66m is not needed?

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    Re: HD Case: Proposed Plan
Author: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Date:       02/07/2001 11:25 AM

Hi folks:

Since we have only one page, the write up for number 4 will have to be very
brief.  Before writing it, though, I wanted to offer a few bullets
regarding what angle we might take, and let folks respond, comment,
counter, etc. before writing it up.  I'll clean and beef up once we've
agreed to the approach we'd like to take to question #4.  Finally, I can
work from my office on this this evening, which means that I can use the
conference call capability of my office phone to patch everyone in if we'd
like to do a conference call. If that's what folks would like to do, I'd
prefer to do the call at around 7 PM.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

The question for #4 is:

Stock price is down 23%, significant debt has already been tapped to
support massive growth and covenants on that debt restrict taking on a lot
more debt.

What should HD do w.r.t. current operations and future growth strategy?
In the near term focus less on growth and more on getting margins and
EBIT growth back in line with results from previous years.  (Management's
Letter to Shareholders alludes to this, but it's difficult to determine
whether management is just paying lip service to the need to capitalize on
the growth spurt and grown earnings, or continue on the growth effort.)

With respect to funding future (more moderate growth), the company
does have some room to increase long-term debt (e.g., current ratio for
1986 = 2.26).  It seems that HD would get better terms and have increased
flexibility by issuing additional debt rather than relying on lines of
credit.  As such, HD ought to look those sources of funding and fill in any
"funding gaps" with funds from the line of credit.

Given the significant drop in stock price, HD is likely better off in
the near term 1) moderating growth, 2) improving performance to generate
cash internally, and 3) using long-term debt issuance to provide the funds
needed.  Once performance and stock price improves, then HD should consider
a stock issuance.

How can company improve operating performance?
Reduce selling, store operating expenses and pre-opening expenses
Improve receivables turnover
Improve inventory turnover
Improve per store/sales
Consider closing poor-performing stores
All of which will improve margins

Should company change its strategy?  If so how?
Shift from meteoric growth to moderate, targeted growth, and focus on
generating positive cash flow from operations
Focus on improving performance at existing stores; specifically focus on
controlling costs and asset turnover and productivity
Consider another debt issuance rather than rely extensively on credit
line in order to decrease cost of funds and increase flexibility


See Below.
----- Forwarded by Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 01:59 PM -----

	Mary J Heinitz
	08/30/2000 01:54 PM

		 To: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Missing File

The original documentation delivered in connection with the First Amendment
to Indenture dated as of March 26, 1999 among Brigham Exploration Company,
Chase Bank of Texas, Joint Energy Development Investments II Limited
Partnership and ECT Merchant Investments Corp. has been removed from the
Legal Dept. file room, although the empty file folder was left on the
shelf.   Please check your office and return the contents of this file to me
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

We are having a penalty-free week for return of files.  Please help them find
their way back to the file room.


I agree with Donna that we need to present our vision of the RTOs and our
expectations of the shortcomings of the RTO filings prior to the October 15
filing.   I would hope that we have a standardized presentation (Enron's
policy objectives, regional issues, the good news, what's not right today,
etc.) to share with FERC staff.  I would guess that we want to set up
meetings by RTO / region so as to not overwhelm staff.

From my perspective, I'd focus on Cal ISO, NW RTO, MISO, Alliance RTO, Grid
South, Florida Transco if I couldn't do all.  What do people think?

It seems to me that Joe Hartsoe should coordinate all of these meetings and
make sure that we are bringing the right people at the right times.

Thanks,

Jim

Mary Hain@ECT
08/30/2000 02:06 PM
To: Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, swalton@enron.com
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: EPSA Meeting

Sounds like a good idea to me.  Steve Walton and I have been involved in the
NW negotiations.  I'd be happy to go to FERC to talk to Alice, Rob, and Mike.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Donna Fulton @ ENRON                           08/30/2000 11:53 AM

To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EPSA Meeting

Since the rates departments are going to review the October 15 RTO filings,
and because we expect many of them to be deficient, I think we can take
advantage of some opportunities to set up meetings with the three directors
-- Alice Fernandez, Rob Cupina, and Mike Coleman -- to educate them and their
staffs on the minimum RTO requirements we feel are necessary for a successful
RTO.  We can also take this opportunity to let them know some of the
weaknesses we expect to see in the filings, so that they can begin to think
about these issues before the filings are made.  Also, by meeting with FERC
staff prior to the filings, we can state our positions without ex parte
communications on any specific filings.  To make the meetings successful,
we'll need to get input and information from the regional people on the
status of the RTO negotiations.  It might also make sense to have a regional
person attend these meetings to provide first hand accounts of what's been
happening in the RTO meetings.

Joe Hartsoe
08/30/2000 12:14 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EPSA Meeting

Sorry -- This apparently was not recieved by everyone.  Thanks JOE
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

Joe Hartsoe
08/30/2000 08:48 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EPSA Meeting

The EPSA meeting in Chicago was successful.  In addition to numerous
stakeholders, the press was there in full force. It became clear that
deregulation is not complete, and that the problem is not deregulation -- but
continuing unnecessary regulation.

Commissioner Massey's speech on why competition is necessary was actually
quite good.  His message is approximately 90 percent consistent with Enron's
on the wholesale level (He even called for Federal siting authority.).  He
sees price caps as a stop gap only and votes for them as a last resort.
However, he still contradicts himself when he questions the use of single
price auctions because they do not work as intended; but, he comments that
PJM is working.  I and others will work with him to make sure he
understands.

I spent time with Mike McLaughlin (Director of Corporate Applications) and
Rob Cupina (Director of Rates, Central).  We spoke about the RTO filings due
October 15.  I shared my concern that some of the RTO filings may be
incomplete and asked what actions FERC may take if the filings are
deficient.  Mike indicated that the RTO filings will be processed by the rate
offices of the three regions (east, central and west) in Dan Larcamp's group
(OMTR).  He believes that Order 2000 will become as "voluntary" as Order 436
was.

If you would like to discuss or have particular questions, please do not
hesitate to call -- 202.466.9150  JOE


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Attached please find this week's summary of the  most recent CFTC Commitment of Traders Data.

Thanks,
Bob
 - CFTC-NG-5-29-01.doc


What does Standstill Financial Assurance Amount mean?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reeves, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	FW: Revised Daily Notice

FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Francoeur, Ellen" <efrancoeur@iso-ne.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Reeves, Leslie; Nettelton, Marcus
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Arnold, Cheryl; McDonough, Linda; mguillini@iso-ne.com
Subject:	Revised Daily Notice

 - Daily Notice - 12_26_01 EPMI.doc << File: Daily Notice - 12_26_01 EPMI.doc >>


Mr. Nimocks,

How long are you wanting Greg to speak?  What's the format for the
presentations?  Will there be a Q& A after the presentation?

Many Thanks,

Liz

"Bob Nimocks" <bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com> on 08/22/2000 04:31:21 PM
To: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Thanks, Liz. I'll keep my fingers crossed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com]On Behalf Of
Greg.Whalley@enron.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:21 PM
To: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com
Subject: Re: FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Mr. Nimocks,

I don't know if you have spoken w/Greg as of yet.  However, I do know he is
trying very hard to work this into his schedule.  I'll get w/him again
tomorrow morning for an answer.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley

"Bob Nimocks" <bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com> on 08/22/2000 11:18:54 AM

To:   <whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  FW: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

Greg,
Certainly hope you can join us for the keynote session to describe one
year's experience with EOL and what's in store next.  Tim Ling, chairman of
TradeRanger -- the fourteen-company procurement consortium with BP Amoco,
Shell, Unocal, Total Fina and others -- has confirmed.  Still working with
the others.
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nimocks [mailto:bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:20 AM
To: whalley@enron.com
Subject: Interactive Energy Keynote Session

August 17, 2000

Greg Whalley
Vice Chairman & CEO, Enron Net Works LLC
Managing Director, Enron Corp.
PO Box 1188
Houston, TX  77251-1188

VIA E-MAIL: WHALLEY@ENRON.COM

Dear Greg:

To follow with my phone message, please consider accepting a keynote speech
for Interactive Energy, Tuesday morning, Oct. 24, in Houston. We've
confirmed either the head of the E-Commerce Practice or the North American
Energy Practice from McKinsey and have issued invitations to Tim Ling, the
chairman of TradeRanger (the Shell, BP, Unocal procurement hub), and John
Leggate, Group Vice President, IT at BP.

Interactive Energy has grown to be the largest and most prestigious
e-strategy event (see www.interactiveenergy.com).  Skilling gave the
keynote
last year, announcing the launch of Enron Online. Divisional presidents
from
Halliburton, Equiva, Vastar and Reliant Energy participated in the keynote
session.  More than 1,450 executives attended.  Given the large number of
early registrations and the strong program, we expect this year's to be
much
larger.

Ideally, you would give a one-year update on the growth of the EOL and
describe your vision for Enron's future e-business initiatives and
objectives in this area.  The target audience for the conference is senior
energy management who are integrating technology into their core business
strategies.

Interactive Energy 2000, which will have more than 100 speakers, will cover
technology development across five sectors:

1) Upstream
2) Transportation & Logistics
3) Processes (refining, petrochem, power gen. and gas processing)
4) Wholesale
5) Retail

Press Coverage:
The conference has been a high priority for the trade press as well as the
general media.  At previous years' events, we had editors from more than
twenty general business and trade publications, including the Wall Street
Journal, FT Energy, Oil & Gas Journal, Oil & Gas Investor, World Oil,
Bloomberg, PR Newswire, Dow Jones New Retrieval and others.  National
Public
Radio and All Things Considered aired interviews of our key speakers.  As
result of last year's success, we have numerous media sponsors this year,
including Energy Markets, McGraw Hill, Oil & Gas Investor, Houston Business
Journal, PR Newswire, Utility IT, Petroleum Economist, EnergyCentral.com,
Energy Commerce and others.

Benefits:

Enron Net Works will benefit in four ways:

?    First, you will educate customers and partners.  Cisco is bringing
some 70
senior utility executives from Europe to attend; they would be most
interested in your perspectives.  Energy buyers from such organizations as
Ford, United Technologies and e-Mall (an eight-state buying consortium)
have
attended in previous years.

?    Second, you will motivate management from such vendors as Ariba,
Luminant,
IBM, i2 and SAP and many others to develop IT solutions specific to Enron's
vision.

?    Third, you will educate employees.  Some 43 executives from Enron
attended
last year's event.

?    Fourth, you will persuade recruits.  Capable professionals in this
area
are in high demand. Rising stars of the energy industry will learn of
Enron's innovations and rapid growth.

I hope that your calendar is clear.  Look forward to the possibility of
working with you and your staff.  I'll call to follow up.

Yours respectfully,

Bob Nimocks
President
Zeus Development Corporation
2424 Wilcrest Dr., Suite 250
Houston, TX 77042
Main: 713-952-9500
Direct: 832-200-3706
e-mail: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com


Hello again everyone.  One last structure pre-christmas.  I'm am working on
an option structure with TD bank that would see 20,000,000 CAD go out the
door on Wednesday December 22nd or Thursday December 23rd.  There will be no
special documentation necessary, only standard option confirmations.  The
money will return equally over the 12 months of 2000.  TD is charging us a
fee of 50K CAD for the idea but since it is different than the deals we have
already done I'm OK with it.  What I need is the following.

1 -  If there are any questions or concerns please call me early Monday
morning.

2 - Jordon - Please call me and give me your OK.

3.  Juanita - Let me know if you can handle the payment in time.

4.  Joe - How's are Line of Credit coming - we're running out of time.

Thanks

John Lavorato


Not wishing to reply out of turn, the legal approval process for Reference
Entities will be essentially the same for the website as for Enron Online.
It is possible, given the tight timing, that some "finishing touches" needed
to be put to this process after the launch of the website.  Also, Legal will
be producing formalising the procedure (most likely by means of a checklist)
to assist the lawyer/paralegal charged with performing the legal approval
process.

Also, please note that the process in London and Houston for approving
Reference Credits is essentially the same - any difference merely reflects
the more developed/diverse nature of the businesses in Houston and the fact
that there are a number of General Counsels there who need to sign off, while
there is only one in London.

I trust this helps.

Regards

Paul

David Forster
29/02/2000 01:03
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Names on EnronCredit.com

It is my understanding that the EnronOnline approval process is separate and
approval for EnronCredit.com does not automatically mean approval for
EnronOnline.

Debbie/Mark: Can you confirm or refute my understanding?

Thanks,

Dave

Bryan Seyfried
02/28/2000 12:26 PM
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin
McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Names on EnronCredit.com

Attached is the current list of reference credits which are posted on
EnronCredit.com.  It is our understanding that we can quote any of these via
EnronOnline subject to approval from the EOL team.  Pls. confirm this
understanding to all of us but especially mssrs. dilworth and forster


Sue, Mona, Jeff.

Hi.  Attached is an outline  summary of the California gas "analogy" and
PGE's proposed procurement options for its retail electric customers.  I
prepared this summary to help me think about a legislative proposal for Rod
Wright's list, item no. 6.

I have to admit I am a bit fuzzy about ARM's proposal for default utility
procurement service.  How far off is it from PGE's propsal, which is to offer
customers one of of several standardized commodity products?  Can you share
anything on ARM's position with me?

Also, Enron's "Bench Product" was discussed on the call.  Do any of you have
anything on that product?

Cheers,

Alan


Hello Shmuel,

Thanks for your message. The end of 2000 and the beginning of 2001 were
extremely busy
and I could not focus on PSERC issues. I shall consult a few people in Enron
on this subject and get in
touch with you. Our concern right now is that the results of research are
widely shared with
our competition.

I am out on the 19th, but the 20th would work for me. I would be glad to
cover the cost of your Austin
to Houston trip.

Regarding your son. The Analyst / Associate program will interview again on
the campus
in the spring and they will be more than happy to interview him.

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 12/19/2000 01:40:02 PM
To: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc: "Dennis Ray" <djray@engr.wisc.edu>, <Lance.Cunningham@enron.com>,
<Alex.Huang@enron.com>
Subject: Fw: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem

Hello Vince
Happy Holidays.
I wanted to connect with you regarding the possibility of Enron Joining
PSERC. As you might have heard from Lance and Alex we are going through a
transition period having doubled the number of universities and industry
members within the last year. Consequently, our business processes are not
well developed. One of the problems we are facing is the balance between the
electrical engineering folks and industry members that are more interested
in market related research. I hope to recruit more of the later so tat we
have more of a constituency in the Advisory Board  that sees the value of
market related research. I already have a verbal commitment from people at
Electrabell that expressed interest in joining PSERC. With members like
Electrabell and Enron we will be able to support more market Stem projects
such as the one that Shijie Deng proposed (not funded in this round). Please
let me know if I can do anything to facilitate the decision at Enron. I am
going to be in Austin on January 19 to participate at a PUCT hearing and
could come through Huston for a visit. Attached are some items that I shared
with our PSERC members and thought that you might be interested in them as
well.
Regards, Shmuel.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu>
To: "Power Systems Engineering Research Center" <PSERC-L@cornell.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem

> The following are 3 items that demonstrate the impact of PSERC research in
> the market stem area.
>
> 1. On December 12,  I (Shmuel Oren) testified at a hearing in San
Francisco
> before the Blue Ribbon Panel (chaired by Alfred Kahn) for the that is
> investigating the implications of Uniform Price vs. Pay as Bid Auctions in
> the California PX . As part of my testimony I presented a movie produced
by
> Tim Mount and Bob Thomas that show results of an experimental economic
study
> showing how bidders respond by raising their bids in a pay as bid auction.
> Following is an acknowledgement I received.
>
> Dear Shmuel:
>
>
> Thank you for attending the Blue Ribbon Panel this past Tuesday in San
> Francisco.  Your presentation was very informative and valuable to all the
> panel members and other participants.  The Panel greatly appreciates your
> involvement in this important project.
>
>
> Thanks again,
> Natalie Efland
>
>
> 2. A recent E-mail from the Texas PUC
>
> Professor Oren, I hope you and your family are doing well.  We are
seriously
> considering your help and advice to facilitate the Commission's final
> decision regarding retail competition in ERCOT.
>
>  I wanted to let you know that ERCOT Stakeholders filled an Application
for
> Approval of the ERCOT Protocols in November.  We received Comments
including
> List of Issues on November 22 and Reply Comments on December 1.  Staff
will
> draft and submit a Preliminary Order to the Commissioners for their
> discussion on December 13.  There will be a Pre-hearing on December 15
when
> parties will be asked to brief the Commission on list of issues by the end
> of first week in January.  There will be a Hearing on January 16 followed
> with another Hearing if needed.  Parties have asked the Commission to
> finalize its decision by mid March.
>
> To give you some more background, I have to mention that almost most of
your
> suggestions were accepted and will be reflected in the final Protocols,
> except for problems with intra-zonal gaming regarding congestion
management
> and Pay-As-Bid compensation for selected ancillary services.  A few
> additional concerns are raised regarding ancillary services and congestion
> management.  Stakeholders are still working toward more load participation
> in ERCOT market.  However, the main problem is the fact that market (pilot
> that covers 100% of wholesale, but only 5% of retail load) will be open on
> June 1, 2001 based on a version of the Protocols locked on August 1, 2000.
> (That was the deadline for ERCOT to give a final design to Anderson
> Consulting.)  That version does not include some of your recommendations
to
> address market design flaws.  The full version is highly possible to be
> implemented by January 1, 2002 when market for 100% retail competition is
> scheduled to open.  Given this gap, some parties have recommended not to
> implement incomplete Protocols and wait for full implementation by January
> 2002.  In other words, they say let's go ahead with 5% pilot retail load,
> but wait for full design implementation before allowing 100% wholesale
load
> (and retail load) be subject to the rules of the game described in the
final
> Protocols.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Parviz Adib, Ph. D.
> Director of Market Oversight Division
> Public Utility Commission of Texas
> 1701 N. Congress Avenue
> P.O. Box 13326
> Austin, Texas 78711-3326
> Ph. No.: 512-936-7365
>
> 3. The following is a segment from a published summary of the Dec 13 PUCT
> hearing. This segment describes the commision's deliberation on an agenda
> item addressing the possibility of instituting price caps as part of the
> ERCOT protocols. (see reference to my involvement in the next to last
> paragraph)
>
>   Docket No. 23220 - Petition of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas
> for Approval of the ERCOT Protocols.  (Discussion and possible action)
> Parviz Adib, Jess Totten, Keith Rogas, and Tammy Cooper
> Chairman Wood turned to page 2 item number 3 of the draft order
identifying
> issues, recommending that the word "including" be changed to "other than"
in
> the parentheses.  He thinks they know the ups and downs of the two
> mechanisms, which are bid caps and price caps, but would not mind having
> parties focus on what other protections might be used.  Commissioner Walsh
> would say "including, but not limited to" because she does not think it is
a
> bad idea for ERCOT to at least consider in their protocols a fail-safe
> mechanism.  It's kind of like the stock market suspending trading when
> something crazy happens.  They could consider a maximum scenario, such as
> "we don't think this will ever happen but if it does we need to muffle
it",
> whether it is $1,000 or $99 or whatever it is.  They could consider
whether
> to put into the protocols a self-enacting price cap.  While not expecting
it
> to happen, if it did, you don't have to declare it an emergency and have
the
> Commission have to act.  Chairman Wood asked if they could leave the
> question without the parenthetical at all and just say "what protections
> should be added to avoid extreme price spikes."  Commissioner Walsh
> reiterated that she wants ERCOT to think about the unlikely possibility of
> unacceptable price spikes.  She would like for them to have their own
> fail-safe mechanism that is self-initiating as opposed to leaving that to
> having someone have to come in and act.  Commissioner Perlman stated that
he
> thinks the California-type price caps is what the concern is about.  He
> thinks everyone in this state is opposed to those, but he thinks the point
> Commissioner Walsh is making is an interesting one.  He had not thought
> about the circuit breaker idea, and it might have some merit.  He agreed
> that it was worth considering something like that.  Then the question
> becomes what the level is.  Chairman Wood suggested the wording "what
> self-implementing protections should be added to avoid the price spikes.
> Commissioner Perlman said he did not think anyone is talking about $250
> price caps.  Commissioner Walsh agreed, but noted that if the unexpected
> happens we should be prepared.  Commissioner Perlman indicated that if
> someone is making $10,000 in one particular hour that it probably does not
b
> enefit the market and is probably a windfall to them.  It is not something
> they would normally put in their business plan for determining whether
they
> are going to build a plant in Texas.  Chairman Wood stated that they want
to
> lean toward the market as heavily as they can on these issues.
>
> Chairman Wood noted that some of these issues date back to when Dr. Oren
was
> assisting the Commission, and asked if he could be brought back again.
> Staffer Dr. Parviz Adib said that staff had already talked to Dr. Oren and
> that he is available to assist the Commission further.  Chairman Wood
noted
> that Dr. Oren had helped people think outside the box without just
focusing
> on California.
>
> The final wording was clarified to state "self-implementing mechanisms"
and
> to delete the parenthetical part of the sentence in question.  The order
was
> approved as amended.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


I  would love it if we could meet.  We have made a little bit of headway in
this effort, but quite frankly, not much.  In fact, I have seen DASH's that
is indicating the purchase of public equity and I am trying to find out who
and how etc these are being transacted.  Can you set something up or do you
need me to. I will bring somebody from my group to help and learn so we
probably need a conference room.  Thanks for keeping this issue alive.
Donna  P.S.  Has Marie moved to EBS or is she still with you?

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/23/2000 08:59 AM
To: Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: monitoring of equity accounts

Donna:  It's been awhile since we last spoke about advising Enron companies
of existing brokerage accounts.  It has also been determined (in legal) that
the accounts will remain with ME and not move to Alan A.  I have some
temporary assistance in that an A&K lawyer, Jason Peters, is working up here
for another few weeks.  I was hoping that we could all meet and put our
"project" into action.  Please give me a call and suggest some time when we
may meet.  Thanks.  Sara


Tom,

Thanks.
If you have an extra copy, please send me one.

Vince

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
07/28/2000 12:23 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SDDP

Vince,
I'll send him one of the manuals, and perhaps a paper on SDDP.

Tom

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/28/2000 10:53 AM
To: Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: SDDP

Tom,

Can you send the info regarding SDDP to John?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
07/19/2000 06:41 PM
To: "O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SDDP

John,

I shall E-mail the information about SDDP  from Houston.

Vince

"O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> on 07/18/2000 01:47:41 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SDDP

Vincent,

You kindly suggested that I email you with regard to some information you
have on the SDDP system (I'm not sure if I've got the abbreviation correct,
but it's something that is currently used in South America).

Your presentation was very interesting and informative.

Kind regards,

John O'Brien
Manager, Treasury & Risk Management
Snowy Hydro Trading Pty Ltd
Level 17, Bligh House
4 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

US Natural Gas Teams
The US Natural Gas Marketing Originations Teams have had a successful 1Q
2001.  In addition to Mid Market Activity led by Fred Lagrasta, new
Origination Desk Heads and Marketing Teams have been set up across the US and
are led by the following: West Gas Origination - Barry Tycholiz, Central Gas
Origination - Laura Luce, East Gas Origination - Frank Vickers.  These teams
have made significant inroads in 2001, focusing on Customer Coverage, New
Accounts, Transportation Syndication, Risk Management Products and Market
Intelligence.  All of these individuals are open to any questions regarding
the new businesses.

Siebel Summary
EIM's ability to rapidly transform its designated forest products and steel
markets is dependent upon its ability to effectively manage the market
participants and accelerate their adoption of EIM's business strategy.  To
achieve this objective, EIM will implement Siebel Sales Enterprise, a
customer-focused centralized database that effectively leverages all
information learned about our customers and enables sharing of this
information throughout the front, mid and back offices.  Siebel is designed
to help in-house and mobile sales professionals in large organizations manage
accounts, contacts, activities and opportunities associated with the sales
cycle.  EIM Fundamentals is leading the Siebel implementation effort.

IN THE NEWS

Enron is hosting the New York Energy Risk Management Seminar at the St. Regis
Hotel in New York City on April 5, 2001.  Topics include: Power Outlook,
Natural Gas Outlook, and Weather Risk Management. To RSVP, contact Laura Pena
at x 3-5376.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Sherman Franzen, Fariba Karimi, Ryan Krogmeier, Lawrence Marcus
EIM   - Ronald Barnes, Paul Hanks, Chad Ihrig, Stella Pedroza, Linda Silva
ENA  - Hagar Kedem, Steven Merriss, Courdney Williams, Diane Fellers

Transfers
ENA ) Tammie Schoppe, Lynna Kacal, Johnna Kokenge, Karen Jones, Stuart
Zisman, Anne Labbe
EGM ) Justin Cornett, George Thomas, Richard Yeboah, Phi Khanh Wolfe, Alan
Harvey, Philip Berry, Ethan Schultz, Sanjeev Khanna, Mingcheng Lian

NUGGETS & NOTES

 "We have to move paper, make money AND move the industry."  -- Rodney
Malcolm,  Vice President/Forest Products EIM

Congratulations to Angela and Chris Connelly, manager in Coal Trading. They
are the proud parents of Nicholas Connelly, born on March 17 and weighed
7lbs.11oz.  (Rumor has it that at 48 hours of age, he had more hair than his
father!)

Congratulations to Carmen and Glenn Wright, director in Steel Origination who
welcomed little Lauren Nicole born March 12.  She weighed in at 7lbs.13oz.and
debuted with a full head of hair and "making lots of noise."

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


How about this for the banner on EOL

All posted prices are read only. If you are interested in discussing a possible transaction, contact the Enron trading desk.  Please be advised that Enron Corp. and other subsidiaries of Enron have made filings under Chapter 11 of  federal bankruptcy laws.

After further consideration, I think it is important to make clear (1) that we will not automatically agree to the trade if a counterparty calls and (2)  that Enron has filed for bankruptcy protection.

-----Original Message-----
From: Portz, David
Sent: Mon 12/3/2001 6:57 PM
To: Webb, Jay; Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc: Mellencamp, Lisa; Sager, Elizabeth; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); St. Clair, Carol; Aronowitz, Alan; Murphy, Harlan
Subject: EOL click trade curtailment and banner

Jay -- Consistent with my voicemail to you, Elizabeth Sager has indicated that Louise Kitchens and John Lavorado approved that counterparties will not be able to click trades on EOL commencing tomorrow morning, and that the banner shown in red below shall be shown to direct counterparties to execute as over-the-counter trades with desk personnel. Legal's Lisa Mellencamp has okayed the banner in relation to the bankruptcy aspects. Accordingly, please implement for EOL site starting tomorrow.

"All prices posted are read only. Please contact Enron trading desk personnel to transact on posted information."

David A. Portz
Senior Counsel
Enron North America  Corp.
1400 Smith, EB 3805a
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
Phone:   713-853-9239
Fax:   713-646-3491
Cell: 713-417-9116
Assistant:   Linda Simmons (Ext.  57851)


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Linda Guinn
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Linda Guinn Law Conference 2001
Report Total: $729.50
Amount Due Employee: $729.50

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Hey Gerald!

I finally got my computer back up.  The name of the utility is Powder River Energy Corporation - A Touchstone Energy Cooperative (I don't know if you need that last part or not).  The relationship is this:

ECS is acting as the agent on behalf of Crestone Energy Ventures, LLC to purchase power and deliver shaft horsepower.  We will be buying electricity strictly off of PRECORP's tariff.  We will also be providing the cash for PRE to build transmission to the compressor site.  Right now, the deal term is for 10 years, starting in May '02, but we will begin negotiations with them immediately.

Last week I met with three people from PRECORP, just to begin the relationship, one of which was Clarence Moshier (Chief Operating Officer for PRECORP), who I spoke to again yesterday.  He said that they would have no problem signing a CA with us.  Basically, I just want to make sure that whatever we put in place with PRECORP cannot be relayed to Crestone by them.

Anything else you need?

Andrew


Any chance this language came from a credit facility that provides for the
issuance of letters of credit?

	Russell Diamond
	01/05/2001 05:20 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Collateral Question

Mark,

I copied a section of a counterparty's Bank Credit Agreement relating to
certain
negative pledges.  The counteparty is IMC Global whom we have some financial
transactions with (actuall their sub IMC-Canada) at ECC, and now an EES
person is looking to
enter into a long term EES transaction.  We sent them a draft ISDA for future
transactions
out of ECC and we are now being told by the EES person that if a Credit
Support Annex (CSA)
is required in this ISDA it will kill her deal.  She has stated that they are
not able
to fulfil the obligations of the CSA because of the covenants tied to their
Credit
support agreement.  As highlighted in red below, it seems that they cannot
have any liens that
secure derivative obligations, although cash is acceptable up to $10
million.  Can you
please clarify if collateral as it is stated in the ISDA is considered a
lien, and if this type
collateral would be a breach of their credit agreement.  If this is a breach
can you suggest
other methods that we might use so the CSA would be acceptable.

Thanks
Russell

Negative Pledge.   Neither  any Borrower nor  any  Subsidiary  of  any
Borrower  will create, assume or suffer to exist any Lien on any  asset
now owned or hereafter acquired by it, except:

Liens  existing on the date of this Agreement securing Debt outstanding
on  the date of this Agreement in an aggregate principal or face amount
not exceeding $135,000,000;

any  Lien  existing on any asset of any Person at the time such  Person
becomes a Subsidiary of a Borrower and not created in contemplation  of
such event;

any Lien on any asset securing Debt incurred or assumed for the purpose
of  financing  all or any part of the cost of acquiring or constructing
such asset, provided that such Lien attaches to such asset concurrently
with  or  within  90  days  after  the  acquisition  or  completion  of
construction thereof;

any Lien on any asset of any Person existing at the time such Person is
merged  or  consolidated with or into a Borrower or a Subsidiary  of  a
Borrower and not created in contemplation of such event;

any  Lien existing on any asset prior to the acquisition thereof  by  a
Borrower or a Subsidiary of a Borrower and not created in contemplation
of such acquisition;

any  Lien  arising  out  of  the  refinancing,  extension,  renewal  or
refunding  of  any Debt secured by any Lien permitted  by  any  of  the
foregoing clauses of this Section, provided that the proceeds  of  such
Debt  are  used  solely for the foregoing purpose and to pay  financing
costs and such Debt is not secured by any additional assets;

Liens  arising in the ordinary course of its business which (i) do  not
secure  Debt  or  Derivatives  Obligations,  (ii)  do  not  secure  any
obligation in an amount exceeding $100,000,000 and (iii) do not in  the
aggregate materially detract from the value of its assets or materially
impair the use thereof in the operation of its business;

Liens  on  cash and cash equivalents securing Derivatives  Obligations,
provided that the aggregate amount of cash and cash equivalents subject
to such Liens may at no time exceed $10,000,000; and

Liens  not otherwise permitted by the foregoing clauses of this Section
securing  Debt in an aggregate principal or face amount, together  with
all  other Debt secured by Liens permitted under this Section  5.09(i),
not  to  exceed  an  amount  equal to 10%  of  Consolidated  Net  Worth
(calculated  as  of  the last day of the fiscal quarter  most  recently
ended  on  or prior to the date of the most recent incurrence  of  such
Debt).


lets start at 3pm today, I need to get a few things done first with the exchange first
I changed the meeting with Laura so that we can work as long as we need to

dq

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	monica.l.brown@accenture.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Re: Meeting

That will be fine!  See you at 2:30pm!

Thanks!
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

            Dutch.Quigley@enron.c
            om                           To:     Monica L. Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                         cc:
            11/26/2001 04:34 PM          Subject:     Meeting

Monica,

Can we meet for more than 1 hour tomorrow ?
I sent an email to Laura to change meeting with her until Wednesday.

Dutch

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


**Clarification**

Harassment Prevention Training

This training is mandatory for all Enron employees employed since the last
seminar was conducted  in late 1998 or early 1999.  Those who have already
attended Enron harassment avoidance training will be offered a refresher
course in avoiding and preventing harassment.

To contribute our personal best at ENRON, our conduct must promote respectful
and co-operative work relationships. Workplace harassment conflicts with
ENRON's vision and values and violates Company policy.  Harassment also can
violate federal and state laws.  By understanding what harassment is and its
potential harm, we can prevent it in our workplace.

During this training you will:

 Be able to recognize harassment
 Learn to take precautions against being harassed
 Learn to avoid being considered a harasser
 Know how to address a situation involving harassment
 Learn how harassment prevention is consistent with ENRON values

Please click here (  )  to sign up for the session of your choice.    If you
have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.

We are pleased to announce that all employees of EWS and EES will receive
harassment prevention training.

The dates and times available for the sessions are:

 Friday, Feb 23; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15
  Monday Mar 5; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15; 4:30 - 6:00

All training sessions will be held in the LaSalle Room at the DoubleTree
Hotel.
There is a $50 charge for each attendee in the training session.


For sure.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hey Guys.

The ISO cutting our off-peak imports from PV has been an ongoing problem. Now that we are doing congestion wheels again we can finally do something to avoid these cuts using congestion wheels.

Normally the ISO will cut our Import and shift our load from NP15 (PGE1&2&3) across the path to relieve the congestion. If you submit a congestion wheel there cannot be $30 cong,  thus they will not cut your schedule going in at PV.  Instead of shifting your load the ISO will award your congestion wheel and everybody will be happy. It is important to make your wheel larger then your import to ensure that part of your import not getting cut. I would recommend to put in the max number of MW's you think you can buy in the North and get rid of in the Desert. Go big in the off-peak, we submitted 200MW wheels Saturday and I think its safe to do similar size most nights.

Geir


Command: MATCH
Date: 9/25/2001
Time: 12:04:57 PM
TransactionID: 400957
AgencyID: 1773
Recipient: Catholic Charities USA
1731 King Street, Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314
DonorID: 6661
GiftDate: 9/24/2001
GiftAmount: 200
Purpose: September 11th Disaster Relief
Result: Success

If you have not already done so, please send your donation to
Catholic Charities USA
1731 King Street, Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314.
If they do not receive your donation within five days we will have to deny this request.

We have received the above Request.
If everything appears correct there is no need to contact us.
However, if you did not make this request or there is an error in the above information, then email us at: enron@easymatch.com or call us at: 1-866-545-9204.


Patrick,
See if you can help this guy.  I don't have access to Denver deals.
DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
02:53 PM ---------------------------

Genaro Mendoza@ENRON
12/13/2000 10:13 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TAGG # Needed

Darron,

 Can you provide me with a TAGG # for deal # 307287 (10/00 purchase from
Dynegy Marketing & Trade - Denver Desk)? The economics report has XXX.

Thanks,
Genaro


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for 7/19/2000.

Thanks,

Kyle


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/01/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/30/2000 04:23 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc: John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Capacity Options meeting

Here is a quick summary of our meeting on capacity options on TW.  Bill
Cordes, Steve Harris, Shelley Corman, John Buchanan, Tony Pryor, and members
of the TW Commercial Group (including Jeff Fawcett) were present.

 1.  The group all agreed that while it is probably a good idea to mention
that the options could be sold in an online format, we do not want to limit
ourselves at this point and should probably just state that a notice will be
posted on the TW website whenever we have options for sale.

 2.  Price:  the filing needs to include a discussion of how price will be
determined, and how capacity will be awarded.  We might also need to include
an estimate of how much revenue options will generate in the first year.

 3.  Need to add a short explanation of where TW will get the capacity if a
shipper exercises its call option.

 4.  Should frame the service as requiring an exception to current Commission
policy on reserving capacity...not asking Commission to abandon its policy
altogether.

 5.  May need to address:  assignability of options; limitation on damages
for nonperformance.

 6.  Timeline:
  - Turn around a new draft and get further comments (July 3 week)
  - Get Market Services started on its analysis of the new service
  - Begin contacting customers to get their buy-in (Lorraine already has a
producer/customer very interested in supporting our filing)
  - Start the process of getting Board approval (sales of options require
Board approval at Enron)
  - Meet informally with FERC to discuss (Shelley is working on)
  - Make the filing at FERC (we did not try to specify a date yet)

If you have any further comments please let me know.  I am going to try to
get a new draft out by next Friday a.m.


Do you know who is this fellow and why is he sending me a list?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 01:01 PM -----

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	08/16/2000 11:18 AM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses/GCP Setups 08/15/00

---------------------- Forwarded by Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron on 08/16/2000
11:12 AM ---------------------------

Adnan Patel on 08/15/2000 05:43:25 PM
To: Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses/GCP Setups 08/15/00

Bradley Diebner@ECT
08/15/2000 05:19 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/15/00

The EOL approvals for 08/15/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 12:15
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/25/2001 12:12 PM
To: "DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com>
cc: "'chris.booth@enron.com'" <chris.booth@enron.com>, "'jkeffer@kslaw.com'"
<jkeffer@kslaw.com>, "'mreuter@kslaw.com'" <mreuter@kslaw.com>,
"'michael.young@northwestern.com'" <michael.young@northwestern.com>, "Kahn,
Marguerite R." <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>, "Wright, Tremaine S."
<TremaineWright@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Re: Turbine Purchase - Status

Redline of revised assignment and assumption agreement.

Kay


Mr. Pye -

Ken Lay would only be available on December 4, 2000 as we have an Enron Board
dinner on Monday, December 11.

Thanks.

Rosalee

"WalterPye" <WalterPye@email.msn.com> on 07/12/2000 03:47:45 PM
To: <jim_braniff@ajg.com>, <rodc@insource.com>, <tcarey@crc-evans.com>,
<ecockrell@Cockrell.com>, <mfc-mca@worldnet.att.net>, <jddec@insync.net>,
<posres@aol.com>, <bdussler@palmetto-partners.com>,
<richarde@centurydev.com>, <bbh@group1auto.com>, <mnk@caller.infi.net>,
<klay@enron.com>, <savoycap@msn.com>, <hjp@pappasrestaurants.com>,
<pway@wayholding.com>
cc:
Subject: December Christmas Couples Dinner

TO:          WPO FORUM MEMBERS

FROM:    H. WALTER PYE, JR.

RE:          December Christmas Couples Dinner

We are in the process of planning our December Christmas Couples Dinner and
we have two possible dates.

Please advise by email which of these dates will better fit your schedule.
(Please indicate both dates if you are available for both dates.)

                            Monday, December 4, 2000    ________________

                            Monday, December 11, 2000  ________________

Thank you.

WalterPye@email.msn.com


We have made the  following modifications to the EnronOnline applications.

Stack Manager Changes

Fill Order Enhancements - (Effective Tuesday September 25)
?	To fill a Top of Stack order in Stack Manager, Right click on the pink shaded order in the depth window of Stack Manager and select fill.
?	The trader now has the ability to fill limit orders that appear at the top of the trader's stack on both sides.
?	The order will now be filled at the full order volume regardless of the trader's stack volume.
?	Filling an order will not move the trader's price or cause a hedge to occur.

Resize floated stack windows- (Effective Tuesday September 25)

You will now have the ability to resize the stack window to the desired extent.

Website Changes ( Effective Monday September 24)

Limit Order Restrictions on Physical Transactions -
?	Customers will not be allowed to transact with themselves on physical transactions. If a top of stack limit order has been placed on a physical product the counterparty or desk that placed the order will not be allowed to transact on it.
?	If a customer or desk has top of stack limit orders at different prices on both the bid and offer and subsequently moves the price of one so that they are at the same price, both orders will be cancelled. The customer would have effectively transacted with himself.

Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks.

Savita ( X 31787)


We have received an executed Second Amendment to ISDA Master Agreement dated as of October 3, 2001 between Bank of America, N.A. and Enron North America Corp., which amendment amends the Part 4(c)(ii) of the Schedule which states that Bank of America is a multibranch party and may act through the Offices set forth on Appendix A - Amendments.

Copies will be distributed.


At Enron, performance is formally evaluated twice a year and your feedback
plays an important role in the process.  In order for this process to be
successful, your participation is critical in meeting Enron,s Performance
Management goals.  Our goal of achieving 360 degree feedback is a key part of
the communication process at Enron.  This feedback helps foster teamwork, as
well as enables Enron to reward innovation and hard work.

The deadline for feedback to be submitted for the 2000 Performance Evaluation
Process (PEP) is FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17. If you have been selected as a
reviewer, please take the time today to provide this feedback in order to
avoid possible system delays near the deadline.

You can access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and select Performance Review
under Performance Review Services on the menu bar. Also, don,t forget to
complete your self evaluation -- simply select Self Evaluation under
Performance Review Services.

If you have any problems accessing the system or any questions regarding the
Performance Management Process, please contact:

  In Houston:
  _PEP Help Desk at (713) 853-4777, Option 4
  _perfmgmt@enron.com

In London:
  _PEP Help Desk at (44) 207-783-4040, Option 4
  _pep.enquiries@enron.com

Enron,s success each year can be attributed to the innovative and diligent
efforts of our employees.  Please help do your part to make sure each member
of the Enron team is recognized for his or her contributions. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation in helping make the Performance Review Process a
success.

Mark Frevert