Dave,

See below broad summary from certain key Eurpoean jurisdictions. The
"concern" countries are Belgium and the Netherlands.

J

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 26/05/2000 12:58
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "West, Nick" <nick.west@linklaters.com>
26/05/2000 12:58

To: "'jboyd@enron.com'" <jboyd@enron.com>
cc: "Didizian, Marly" <marly.didizian@linklaters.com>

Subject: Enron online/sports.com competition

Dear Justin

You asked for a summary of the UK and foreign advice which we have collated
on the lawfulness of the Enron online/sports.com "spread betting"
competition. I have set out a short note below. Marly and I would be happy
to discuss it with you further by telephone at any time this afternoon.

I have assumed that the competition is based predominantly on chance. I have
also assumed that there is no element of indirect consideration required to
enter the competition. We may need to discuss these points in more detail.

UK:

There appears to be no problem. The competition cannot be a lottery as the
contestants do not pay to enter. The competition may fall within the
definition of gaming, but only unlawful gaming is prohibited. The
competition format which you have described is unlikely be an unlawful game.

Germany:

There appears to be no problem as far as gaming laws on lotteries and the
German Trading Regulations are concerned, because the participants will not
pay to enter the competition. However, it is possible that there may a
breach of unfair competition laws. One of Enron's customers without online
trading capacity or one of Enron's competitors could argue that the
competition is anti-competitive i.e. Enron is trying to influence the
decision of its online trading customers as to whether they should trade
with Enron at all. We should consider this risk in greater detail. If the
game was held to be anti-competitive, Enron would have to cease to offer it
to German customers.

Netherlands:

Under the Dutch Games of Chance Act (GCA), games of chance are generally
prohibited, even if participation is free.  However, we have been advised
that, to date, it is not clear whether the GCA even applies to internet
games. We have also been advised that, in any event, the Dutch authorities
are unlikely to consider it a high priority to try to enforce the GCA
against a game offered for a limited time with only a moderate prize.
Finally, we have been advised that if the game complies with the law in the
country of its origin, this would decrease the likelihood of any Dutch
action. Thus the key decision in the Netherlands is whether the commercial
benefits of the competition outweighs the risk of a fine for contravention
of the GCA - maximum NLG 25,000 (approx 10,000 USD).

The GCA also only applies to games of chance. The provisions of the act
could be avoided if a greater degree of skill was introduced in to the
competition.

Italy:

You may recall that under Italian law, it appears that Enron will need to
get the approval of the Italian Ministry of Finance to offer the game to
Italian customers as it falls within the definition of an "advertising
contest". Having discussed this matter with our Italian colleagues, it seems
that Enron will be unable to avoid this requirement unless it does not offer
prizes. Authorisation is likely to take a minimum of 30 days - there is no
fast track process. Furthermore, since the website will be co-branded Enron
online/sports.com, we have been advised that both parties would need to seek
authorisation. Failure to obtain authorisation may result in a fine of up to
15m Lire (approx 7,500 USD) and continuing an unauthorised game in
contravention of an order of the Ministry of Finance may result in a fine of
up to 100m Lire (approx 50,000 USD).

We have also been advised that the Italian Ministry of Finance does not
undertake regular or thorough searches of the internet to identify
potentially unlawful advertising contests. With this is mind, Enron may
consider that the commercial benefits of running the competition in Italy
outweighs the risk of being fined. We may need to consider this issue in
more detail.

Belgium:

The advice we received from our Belgian colleague is inconclusive. The game
does not fall foul of the new Law on Games of Chance as no entry fee is
charged. However, we have been advised that there is a small risk that the
game may be prohibited under the Law on Lotteries of 1851 since it is a game
of chance. This risk can be alleviated by limiting the access to the game to
defined group of users - as is the case here - and by increasing the level
of skill involved. We may need to consider this risk in more detail since
civil and criminal sanctions may be imposed on the organisers of a
non-authorised lottery - imprisonment for up to 3 months and a fine of up to
BEF 600,000 (approx 14,000 USD) for the organiser of the competition (Enron)
as well as a fine for the distributor (sports.com) of up to BEF 200,000
(approx 4,500 USD)

Switzerland:

There appears to be no problem under Swiss law as the contestants do not
need to pay to participate.

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Joe

A couple of questions.

1.  Where did the Gas Trading P/L derive from this month.

2.  How are you coming on the position reports we discussed.

Talk to you soon.

John Lavorato


Michael,
 Please note that the footer is wrong on the 1999 MTBE doc.  It should be
98002gctr.doc instead of 98002fctr.doc.
Please let me know if you need anything further.


Susan,
I'm assuming that Ms. Corman is "all over this."  I was wondering whether you
intended to go to D.C. also to represent TW's interest in the proceeding?  If
not, may we assume that Shelley will give us a complete report on the meeting
and FERC's next steps?

I note with curiosity the reference in the GD article to the fact that
parties apparently were asking whether pipelines "needed" to offer new
services?  Do you know the background behind this issue?  It may have some
bearing on the Transport Options filing as at least one party I believe
questioned why TW was even offering this new service.  In addition to the
question of affiliate relationship/behavior, the question of market power
(ie. capacity hoarding) apparently is ripe for discussion also during the
Jan. 31 meeting.

Do you know if we are working to prepare comments or a position paper to
submit to FERC by Jan. 5?

One last thing, how should we proceed with respect to coordinating the timing
of our technical conference on Transport Options with this pending meeting at
FERC?  Do we gain more by attempting to schedule a technical conference
before the FERC meeting or after?   It seems to me that if the technical
conference was held before the FERC meeting, all protest issues related to
affiliate marketing rules and/or capacity hoarding questions could easily be
set aside pending the outcome of the FERC meeting and/or any subsequent FERC
rulemaking on the matter.  However, I question FERC's appetite to conduct the
technical conference prior to the Jan. 31 meeting when it is known in advance
that the affiliate marketing rules figure so prominently in the case.  What
do you think?

Regulatory roundup
FERC is getting ready to resume the industry dialogue on promoting
competitive interstate
transportation markets. In an order issued last week, the commission fixed
the date for a
staff conference on one of the most contentious topics in the industry:
affiliate transactions.
The meeting * the second in a series of three * is scheduled for Jan. 31.
Comments
and requests to participate are due by Jan. 5.

Commission staff will have their hands full with this one. At the first
roundtable on
Sept. 19, FERC tackled efforts to promote greater market liquidity following
the introduction
of Order 637 (GD 9/20).  The discussions were polite, but they failed to
yield a consensus
over the extent to which FERC needs to overhaul rate design.  Likewise, many
in the
energy industry are not in agreement about the need for new pipeline services.
A discussion of affiliate issues promises to be more rancorous.  At the Sept.
19 meeting,
in fact, some audience participants were eager to call attention to affiliate
problems on certain
interstate pipelines.  FERC staff, however, kept a lid on those discussions,
and did not
allow comment on any ongoing case.

On Jan. 31, the discussion will focus on &whether the regulatory policy with
respect to
pipeline affiliates and non-affiliates, as well as asset managers and agents,
should be revised
to reflect the changing nature of the gas market8 and &whether there needs to
be revisions to
the regulations relating to pipeline affiliates.8

At present, affiliate relationships are governed by certain standards of
conduct.  Other
market participants can monitor those transactions through various posting
and reporting
requirements.  But not all pipelines are subject to the same requirements,
and the upcoming
discussion is intended to open a dialogue about the market power implications
of transactions
between pipelines and their affiliates.  The panel will also examine the
relationship
between non-pipeline capacity holders and their affiliates.


There is a new schedule out for January.  There are several changes, however
all should be agreeable.

Thanks,

Ryan Slinger


Greg,

I'll be out of the office from the 5th of April.  I won't be back till the
16th.  Michelle Nelson (x58091) will run your daily book and John Swinney
(x39111) will be available to answer any questions you may have.

Thanks,
Shifali


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewchuk, Ken
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:38 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:


Hey John,

Clearly having any job is better than  none, but I am curious how y'all are viewing the UBS acquisition.  If a  clear break from Enron can be achieved quickly, that would be a beautiful  thing.  However, it is hard to imagine that will be possible.   Thoughts?  I have been talking with Fairley, but I am curious if there was  anything that left a bad taste in your mouth from your meetings with him.   My resume has already been sent to most of the energy companies, but I have  received zip responses.  The Enron Effect has really confused the  market.  I have not lost hope, but if I do not start seeing some movement  by the end of February I will begin to worry.  I still hope to stay in  energy and to stay in Houston, but if February proves to be a dead month, I will  start considering relocating.  What a friggin' mess.  Where are y'all  going to be located?

Hopefully, you have been able to put  some of this behind you and enjoy the forced "slow time".  I played golf  last week, but I had to use someone's clubs and it completely screwed me (I  wouldn't even consider what I was doing "golf").  Oh well, back to the  range.

Keep in touch,
Mathew
----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Griffith@enron.com >
To: <mgimble@houston.rr.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:30  AM
Subject: RE: Just  Checking
> I have received an offer from UBS and I have  basically accepted.  I am not
> required to sign a contract.  I  am an employee at will.  How are you doing?
> Any leads?
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From:   "Mathew M Gimble" <mgimble@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Thursday,  January 24, 2002 1:11 PM
>    To:      Griffith, John
>    Subject:  Just Checking
>
>
>    Griff,
>
>    Had lunch  with Fairley the other day  and was wondering how things are
>     going with you.  Are you going with  UBS?  What's  going on?
>
>    Mathew
>
>
>
>  **********************************************************************
>  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for  the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com  and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail  (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)  and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron  Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,  and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or  otherwise. Thank you.
>  **********************************************************************
>


Just to catch you up a bit...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000 02:25
PM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll@ECT
08/21/2000 10:32 AM
To: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VEPCO Information Request

To all:

In our last meeting with VEPCO we presented a structure that would

1).  Allow Enron to sell the Edgecombe plant to VEPCO at a fixed price at the
end of the term of the PPA (around $325/kW)
2).  Allow VEPCO to buy the plant from us at a fixed price at the end of the
term of the PPA (around $425/kW).

This structure caps our downside risk into a quantifiable number (it also
limits our upside but we're willing to give that up to protect against a big
negative hit).

In order to evaluate this structure, VEPCO has asked for some specific plant
information.  We have most of this info in various forms and I would like
your help pulling it together.

1).  Full plant description (equipment, design, drawings)
2).  Construction costs (have we gotten updated NEPCO numbers for this
project?)
3).  Permits (timeline for obtaining, run hours allowed on both natural gas
and fuel oil, emission limits)
4).  Fuel contracts (in process).

Please let me know what you have and an estimate on timing to get the rest of
the request.

If we can negotiate this structure with VEPCO, we will make a significant
jump in getting the internal okay to move forward.

Thanks for your help,

Heather


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
01:00 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Douglas S Friedman                           01/16/2001 11:17 AM

To: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline / Envera

The Agenda from our meeting with Andy on Nov 7.

Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
11:16 AM ---------------------------
From: John Viverito@ENRON on 11/07/2000 10:14 AM
To: Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  EnronOnline / Envera

All-

Pursuant to our meeting yesterday, regarding the captioned matter, I have
prepared a brief summary of the general issues, which are likely to be of
interest to EOL and may be discussed in the meeting today with Andy Zipper.

Please feel free to add any points that you deem appropriate.

1.  The Links:

A link from Envera's site to EOL will be created.  The link would only be to
the home page of EOL.   There would be no effect upon normal EOL vetting
procedures for counterparties.

A link from Envera's site to Deal Bench will be created.  Again the link
would only be to the home page of Deal Bench.  The Envera member companies
would be required to follow normal Deal Bench registration of participants,
however, such parties during 1Q 2000, would be permitted to engage in two
free transactions on Deal Bench, with a maximum of 25 such free transactions
in total. Presently, it is still under consideration as to whether such
access would be to the auction area, or the collaboration area, or some
variation thereof.  The fees to be charged post 1Q 2000 are under
consideration.

2.  Trades

On a case-by-case basis, with no preexisting commitment, EGM would consider
requests from Envera customers to make trades on a contingent basis on EOL.
In the event that such trade is considered promising, then such pricing would
be posted on EOL.  This would be free for the first 12 months, but thereafter
such service would be provided for a fee.

3.  Envera Membership and Enron Services as Consideration for Envera Equity

EGM would pay between $300-500k for the ability to utilize the Envera hub to
do deals for the period of [one year].

Some portion of the fee may also be considered as payment for equity in
Envera LLC.  The Enron services provided (points 1. and 2. above, as well as
access to Enron risk management and utility outsourcing ) will also be
considered as payment for some portion of the Envera LLC equity.  The total
equity received, is anticipated to be around five percent and the
capitalization of the company is believed to be around $50,000,000.  The
breakdown for the consideration for the equity still needs to be reviewed
from the accounting side.

4.  Board Seat Considerations

Discussion regarding Enron obtaining an Envera Board seat has been
discussed.  The fiduciary risks need to be considered, as we may be
restricted in competing with Envera, unless certain steps are taken.  For
example, if Commodity Logic were to be considered a competitor to Envera,
unless we had the specific right to compete we could be subject to suit by
Envera.  These risks may be negated through negotiation.

The upside here would be the ability to have access to executives of certain
petrochemical companies who are also shareholders in Envera and have Board
seats.  It is believed that this type of access would likely lead to more
deals for EGM and potentially for other Enron entities.

Unrelated to the Board seat, other promotional activities relating to Enron's
services are foreseen through activities at Trade Shows and other networking
venues.

5.  Building Connectivity Between Envera and Enron

It will be necessary to consider what activities, from the technical side,
would be undertaken by Envera and what activities would be undertaken by
Enron, to achieve the stated objectives, i.e. linking.

6.  Press Release

Envera is likely to want to make a public statement regarding this
transaction with Enron.  The restrictions on the scope of such announcement
must be considered.

I hope this is helpful.

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000 09:12 AM -----

	John Viverito
	11/06/2000 01:45 PM

		 To: Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:  EnronOnline / Envera

Doug/Alan/Travis

I have reserved EB 38C1 at 4:00 p.m. today to discuss the captioned matter.

I look forward to seeing you there.

Thanks,

John Viverito


Louise,

Can we grant him guest access to EOL again? He is he same
person who requested it a few weeks ago. Evidently he was busy
working on another project.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
09:06 AM ---------------------------

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 07/25/2000 11:09:47 AM
Please respond to ekrapels@esaibos.com
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Energycast

Dear Vince,

I hope your trip to Australia was successful. It's one of my favorite places
to go.

I've copied you on the email to Mike initiating Enron's trial service to
Energycast. Thanks for helping to set this up.

Would you ask the authorities in Enron to refresh my access to Enrononline?
My Guest User ID as ENA61296 and my guest password was TR84BY13. They no
longer work, probably because I haven't visited the site in months as we
were in full development mode on Energycast.

Vince, you will note in our website references to forward prices of power in
Nepool, NYPP, and PJM. We use Reuters as a reference -- not satisfactory. If
your traders like Energycast and Enron became a client, would Enron consider
linking its prices to our site? We have to improve over the Reuters quotes
and regard Enrononline or Bloomberg as the best candidates. Over time, as
our service spreads I believe this could help generate deal flow for your
traders.

Let me know what you think.

Ed


Yes, I'll hold 2 tickets for you until I hear back.

Liz

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark E Haedicke                           04/06/2000 12:34 PM

To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Opening Game @ Enron Field - 4/7

Liz, I would love to go.  Can I let you know tomorrow as I am still not sure
what time by obligations here are over?    Mark


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for today.

Robin,  I will send the Benchmark for today's numbers at approx. 7-7:30pm.

Thanks,

Kyle


fyi
Received: from mail.buysidedirect.com (w219.z064220135.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net
[64.220.135.219]) by tfsgateway.andrews-kurth.com; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:23:19
-0500
Received: from pc10 (pc10.buysidedirect.com [192.168.0.110]) by
mail.buysidedirect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/buysidedirect-20000308) with SMTP id
LAA14979; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lisa O'Connor" <lisa@imarkets.com>
To: <jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>
Cc: "Mike Minnnich" <minnich@imarkets.com>
Subject: BuySideDirect Agreement
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:22:05 -0700
Message-ID: <NEBBJKCDAMCKKPLIOOJAGEMCCCAA.lisa@imarkets.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C03F3E.F8B297F0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Dear Jason,

Enclosed is the BuySideDirect agreement, complete with the revisions that we
discussed.

Rgds,

Lisa

Lisa Mears O'Connor, CFA
BuySideDirect LLC
a subsidiary of Intelligent Markets, Inc.
415-369-5020 Phone
415-369-5021 Fax

 - Enron BuySideDirect Subscriber Agreement Dated August 25 2000.doc


Monday, September 25, 2000

Teco Tap    No Flow

HPL LS Katy     15.000 / Enron


Title: CERA European Power Update
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2807;

***********************************************************************

In a November 20, 2001 CERA Conference Call and Web Presentation, Scott Foster
and Tanguy Le Quenven discussed:

*  The emergence of a new risk environment in European power markets

*  Does the commoditization of power remove the need for asset ownership?

*  The winners in this market will need the right balance of contracts and
assets

Please follow the above URL to view and listen to a replay of this CERA
conference call. When the Premiere Conferencing PlaceWare window opens, simply
enter your name and click the "View" button. A "recording key code" is not
required.

Hosted by Premiere Conferencing

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Playback
CERA Knowledge Area(s): European Power

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
04:12 PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston
09/29/2000 03:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hickerson/EGM Knowledge Management

Following our meeting with Gary today, Scott and I prepared the following
work plan.  Hopefully, this reflects the conversation and planning in today's
meetings.
Please send comments and revisions.

Cordially,

Robert Johnston
Manager, Political & Sovereign Risk
Enron North America
713-853-9934


OK.  DF

Christine Stokes
06/05/2000 02:17 PM
To: Lorraine Lindberg, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Revised Contract Approval Request

REVISED CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Attached is a revised non-standard discount letter for Southwest Gas
Corporation (SWG).  SWG shall enter into a 10 year agreement for 14,000 Dth/d
of seasonal (November through March  period) capacity from Transwestern's
East of Thoreau (EOT) Area to the Southwest Interconnect located in the East
of California Area.  The $.10/Dth/d transportation rate shall increase
annually by $.005/Dth/d for the term of the agreement.  Alternate receipt
point rights shall be from Transwestern's EOT Area and from the Bloomfield
Compressor.  SWG ROFR rights shall be waived.

Paragragh 6 has been revised.  Transwestern is proposing the ability to
retain any capacity release revenues which SWG may realize for capacity
released at rates above the applicable discounted transportation rated
provided by Transwestern to SWG.  This paragraph now stipulates that in the
event that the FERC does not grant Transwestern the ability to retain these
defined revenues, then this provision, provided in Paragragh 6, shall be
deleted and the remaining contractual agreement and applicable discount
provisions agreed upon between Shipper and Transwestern shall be kept in
place.

Please indicate your approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.  All Officer approvals
shall be faxed to Bill Cordes for final Officer approval.


Shirley,

The traders are:  John Arnold, Mike Maggi, Larry May, John Griffith, Dutch
Quigley.  Joey Taylor, Bilal Bajwa, and myself need access as well.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274

From: Shirley McDowell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/21/2001 03:20 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Trader Web-site Access Project

Errol - Can you please provide me your access information ASAP (requested
below on March 13).  If your team will not need access to the Trader Report
Viewer web-site please let me know.  Thank you!  Shirley

 -----Original Message-----
From:  McDowell, Shirley
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Keiser, Kam; Baumbach, David; McLaughlin, Errol
Cc: Gossett, Jeffrey; Love, Phillip; Giron, Darron; Ryder, Patrick; Stock,
Stephen
Subject: RE: Trader Web-site Access Project

Kam, David, and Errol -
Please forward to me your region's access criteria no later than 11:00 am,
Monday, March 19  (see request below from Tuesday). We need to pull
everyone's access information together in order to plan Security requirements
for the Trader Web-site. Thank you for your help!
Shirley

 -----Original Message-----
From:  McDowell, Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Keiser, Kam; Giron, Darron; Baumbach, David; McLaughlin, Errol
Cc: Gossett, Jeffrey; Love, Phillip
Subject: Trader Web-site Access Project

Team -
Please provide me your list of names for each trader that should have "View
Access" for your region on the Trader web-site to be developed.  If you also
need "Update Access, in addition to view access" please provide a separate
list for those as well.

Please send me your lists by end of day tomorrow (Wed, 3/14) if possible, or
let me know when you can provide the information.  Thank you for your help!!
Shirley


Russell:
I have sent to Mary and Tana the issues that need to be resolved on these 2
amendments.  They are minor but need a lawyer's attention and Mary will
coordinate with Luke M. and Suzi on this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Russell Diamond
	08/09/00 10:05 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Engage

Mary,

Per my voice mail to you, I am updating you on the status of the ISDA's we
have sent to Engage:

1) Engage Energy US, LP:
I spoke to Luke Mickum, the legal person at Engage US (713-877-7446), this
morning.  He is looking into what issues need to be reviewed/discussed.
According to Carol there are no open issues.  If that is the case can we send
executed copy's of the ISDA to him for signature.  Before it is sent off, we
need to make sure the correct changes have been made to the Credit Annex, as
the credit support provider has changed from my original credit worksheet.  I
am not sure if Carol had made those changes in her drafts.

2) Engage Energy Canada, LP
According to the Lotus Notes Database, the draft amendment of this contract
was also sent to Luke, although he is the US lawyer.  A draft needs to be
sent to the Canadian Lawyer, Suzzi Sethi 403-297-0348.  She sent us a draft
guaranty for review with the guarantor West Coast Gas Inc.  This counterparty
is the new guarantor for Engage Canada and the ISDA Credt Annex needs to be
updated accordingly.  Once again, we need to make sure the Credit information
is still correct in the original draft.  I have given a copy of the guaranty
to Tana, can you please review this and provide your comments to Suzzi.

Please let me know if you require any additional information.

Thank you,

Russell

   Carol St Clair                08/04/2000 11:58 AM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Engage

Russell:
I am working with Tana on the Engage US amendment.  There should be no open
issues, but before I left I sent some e-mails to Luke Mickum, their attorney
which he never responded to.

Tana,
Please ask Mary Cook to review the Engage Canada Guaranty from West Coast.
The comments that I made to the other Engage Guaranty which I have forwarded
to you should apply here.  Has their attorney in Canada responded to  the
Engage Canada amendment?  The latest draft of the Engage US amendment and the
latest draft of the Engage Canada amendment I believe is still on your system
and should be in the file, but you and Mary should both follow up with their
attorney based on the e-mails that I sent to him which I have forwarded to
you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Russell Diamond
	08/03/00 02:34 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Engage

Hi Carol,

Hope you and you newborn are doing well?  I am not sure what work issues you
are handling, if any, but I would like to ask you if you have any further
information on Engage.  I think Tana Jones may have been speaking to you on
this issue.  I have received a guaranty format from Westcoast Gas Inc. to
cover Engage Energy Canada LP.  They are waiting on our review before they
issue the executed document.  Tana has a copy of this.  Also, I would like to
know what outstanding issues we have with the Engage US and Canada ISDA
amendments so I can go ahead and work to finish them up.

Hope all is well,

Russell


Do you know if 288 is closed anywhere?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


This looks fine to me.  I would feel better without the Big "E" on the screen
since I wouldn't think you would want to give the impression that each of
your trading floors was an Enron office.


Ron-- I am not  sure what this is? Can you help me?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 07:15 AM -----

	"Bill Hayes" <hpbbill@pdq.net>
	08/14/2000 01:50 PM

		 To: <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: response to letter dated July 26, 2000 (ref.: HPL P.O. no.
4500013202)

Richard,
    I am following up to see if you received our response to above letter
and that everything is in
order.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call Ron Coker (Mgr.
of Estimating & Engineering) or myself @ 281-449-8241.

        Regards,
              Bill Hayes- H.P.B.


Glad you could make the trip.

From: Ken Cherry/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 05:17 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Thanks!

Just wanted to say thanks for the opportunity to travel with you to Wiggins
compressor station. I will look forward to working with your respective
organizations around procurement, contracting and deal issues. I hope our
paths will cross again.

regards,

Ken Cherry


Type  Comm Fuel  Total at $8.70
FT  .044 1.90%  .2125
IT  .1907 1.90%  .3592

Diff  .1467


i got your message last night this morning.  i was already asleep when you
called.  did you go out last night?  i thought you were drinking and dialing
me.  just kidding.  i will pick you up at 8:30 tonight.


fyi  - there has been some concern that this deal was being put together
without Connecticut authorities knowing the full extent of our interest in
FCEL.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/24/2000 04:51 PM -----

	David W Delainey@ECT
	09/22/2000 06:32 PM

		 To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: FCEL

Guys, I have spoken to Cliff and Mark and we are comfortable moving forward
under the structure we have discussed.

 FCEL: - $5MM in equity and 1.3MM warrants from corporate treasury stock that
vest based upon 60MW of orders;
  - discussion with FCEL in which we disclose ALL infromation we have about
the potential Conn. deal - I will require that myself and Mark be on   that
call;
  - the transaction is fully press released immediately.

 CRRA: - subject to final due diligence on the development risks, we provide
the management and wrap for CRRA on the potential fuel cell development
opportunity that consists of between 25 and 50 MW;
  - any appropriation of funds from the government will require DPUC hearing
at which we will fully disclose in a factual manner our interest in    FCEL.

I will require that Mark Haedicke manage this process and sign off on all
press releases, term sheets, disclosure discussions, contracts and regulatory
filings.  I believe that we have this managed appropriately as long as we
manage the process as per the script and in a factual manner.

Thanks
Delainey


Terry: I am pleased that you will serve and appreciate your question asking
for objectives and goals.  The goal is to get information defining what each
Enron group wants in energy services liberalization. Second is to have them
define by country the impediments to our businesses that we want addressed in
a WTO energy services negotiation and third, what groups or companies in
various regions of the globe can we enlist to lobby their government in
support of an energy services agenda.

Ideally I would like to have input by January 15, 2000. Perhaps we can all
meet in Houston about that time to exchange written information, discuss it
and plan a strategy for 2000.

I will attach the questionaire that Bob Fisher of the Hills group prepared
from the Rachel Thompson paper that was distributed to Energy Services
Coalition members in November and asked that they complete it by the middle
part of December which is today. So far we have had very little response.
The WTO is to meet in Geneva this week to decide a schedule to consider
"services" starting this year. Despite the fact that Seattle did not launch a
formal round of negotiations, the Uruguay Round concluded seven years ago
mandated that the WTO begin negotiations on agrucultural and services
liberalization in 2000. The next formal meeting of the WTO is January 25 in
Geneva.

Joe


Way cool.

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/04/2001 04:09 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: GE Facility Agreement

I reviewed the GE Facility Agreement for CA Dev I and CA Dev II.

Section 6.1.2 of each Facility Agreement references the $1,829,000 payment
which is required to be made on each turbine on or before 1/15/01.  This
amount ties exactly to the amount shown in the most recent payoff calculation
from Global Finance ($1,759,000 progress payment and $70,000 change order).

I am currently revising the Exhibits (1, 2a, 2b) for the Notice of excercise
and the Bill of Sale to show the Purchase Amounts that correspond to the
TurboPark payoff numbers.  I will forward those Exhibits to you shortly.

Fred


Right now, I am booked at 47 Park for next week.  I would love to be closer
to the office, but I don't know if there is anything that makes sense.  Any
suggestions?  If not something close to the office, would you suggest another
spot besides 47 Park?

I am committed to working on my agenda for next week before I leave the
office tonight.  I will e:mail you tomorrow to see if we can schedule a time
to meet and hopefully a lunch or dinner, too.  --Sally


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
12:33 PM ---------------------------

Rick Dietz@ENRON
08/24/2000 05:30 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Chambers/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Claude Tellis/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Howe/HOU/EES@EES, Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Mark
Warner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Toby Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean
Sargent/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Micardo Johns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher Tracy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Allan
Weatherford/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Schwarzbach/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: ATTENTION ALL BASKETBALL PLAYERS

The Enron Basketball Association is hosting a full court "five on five"
tournament on September 16, 2000 from 8:00 a.m. untill 12:00 noon at Lutheran
North High School near the Loop 610 north and Shepherd.

You will be able to enter an entire team or enter as an individual and be
placed on a team.

If you are interested in participating, please contact one of the following
people prior to September 7th:
  Jamie Lynn  ext.  3-9515
  Rick Dietz   ext.  3-5691
   Steve Kleb  ext. 3-3959

We will have a team captain's meeting on September 8th to discuss the
tournament rules and prizes.  We plan to limit the tournament to eight teams,
so please sign up soon to join in on the fun.  There is no entry fee for
Enron Basketball Association Members.

Thanks,

Jamie Lynn, President
Enron Basketball Association


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


M O N D A Y   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

Monday: The CRB Index is higher 0.92 points to 214.82. The
US Dollar Index rose 0.33 points to 117.17.

The Dow Industrials moved higher by 56.02 points, at 10877.33, while
the S&P 500 climbed 3.25 points, last seen at 1248.92. The
Nasdaq Composite eased 25.51 points to 2081.92.

OOO  2 FREE OPTIONS VIDEOS FROM THE OPTIONS INDUSTRY COUNCIL !!!
OOO  http://www.ino.com/specials/oic/video2.html
_____________________________________________________________________

REALISTIC OPPORTUNITY TO STRIKE IT RICH!
_____________________________________________________________________

Dear Trader:

Revolutionary Trading System Lets You Win Over 90% Of Your
Trades...Automatically!"

If you think the best way to trade is waiting to catch a big
move, then I've got some shocking and very exciting news for you!

With this trading approach, you can:

...profit in any market

...identify your risks before you trade

...pinpoint the best opportunities for huge gains

...take trades knowing in advance that you have a better-than-90%
chance of winning!

Introducing ODDS - Options and Derivative Decision Support

Using a little known trading secret employed by professional
traders, the ODDS trading system generates millions of dollars in
profits every year. Until now, never before put in easy-to-use,
hands-on format for everyone from the novice to the professional
trader

FREE 12 PAGE BROCHURE AT...

http://store.ino.com/sale/1E78A/TWODN-ODDS

Click for ODDS Trading
System

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

June Nasdaq futures closed 26.50 lower at 1808.00 today. Prices hit a
fresh two-week low today, but have been trading sideways for several
weeks. The sideways trading favors the bulls, but they still have
some heavy lifting to do and their next upside objective is
resistance at the key 2,000 area. First support is seen at the 1,732
area.

June S&P 500 futures closed 0.20 higher at 1252.00. Same story:
Prices have leveled off the past four weeks, after rallying solidly
off the early-April low. This does favor the bulls, but not greatly.
Technically, bulls still need to push prices above the 1285
resistance area. My bias is still that any recovery in the stock
market and the stock indexes won't be dramatic, but a slower grind
higher, with fits and starts. First resistance is seen at 1285.00.
First support is seen at 1206.00.

LIVESTOCK: June live cattle closed $0.58 higher at 70.75 today.
Prices rebounded from a technically oversold condition today, and on
news that boxed beef prices had improved. Last week, prices hit a
fresh multi-month low. Still, prices are in an accelerating
two-month-old downtrend on the daily bar chart and bears have
control. Next support, basis June, is seen at $70.25. First
resistance comes in at the $71.00 level.

August feeder cattle closed off 22 cents today at $87.65. The rally
in the corn market today hurt feeders. If recent history continues to
play out in feeders, prices may dip a bit more, but the support area
of 87.40 will cap losses. That is the lower level of the trading band
in place for the past several weeks. If prices break down below the
bottom of the recent trading range, then the door is opened to a
lower trend down to the January low just above the $86.00 level. Next
resistance is seen at $88.00. First support is seen at $87.60 and
then at $87.40.

June lean hogs closed $0.25 higher at $68.80 today. Commercial buying
was seen in the futures pits, reports said. Price action today saw
more consolidation after the strong losses recorded in recent weeks.
But the bears still have the momentum on their side at present. Next
support lies at $67.00. First resistance is located at the 69.50
level.

GRAINS: July corn futures closed 4 1/2 cents higher at $2.01 3/4
today. Another "mini" weather scare popped prices today. Two
important things to point out here: One, July corn (now the nearby
contract) did not stay below the key $2.00-per-bushel level very
long. Secondly, notice how even some hot temps forecast for mid-May
popped prices higher. I suspect that with prices this low going into
the growing season, this type of knee-jerk reaction to any changes in
the weather patterns will be the norm. Still, bottom pickers should
beware. Next resistance is now seen at $2.04. Next support is seen at
$2.00.

July soybeans closed 7 1/2 cents higher at $4.43 1/4 today. Like
corn, beans were boosted by a "mini" weather scare and ideas that now
there may not be significant corn acres switched to soybeans.
Importantly, the bean market did not fare that badly, technically,
last week, in the face of the sell offs in corn and wheat futures.
Today's big upside push propelled prices to a fresh five-week high
and pushed prices above a stiff resistance area at $4.45. Bears still
have the advantage. It's going to take a "significant" weather scare
this spring or summer to force soybean prices solidly higher. First
resistance is now seen at the $4.50 area and then $4.55. First
support is now seen at $4.35.

July soybean meal closed up $3.60 at $159.40 today. Prices today
pushed to a fresh nearly three-month-high. Importantly, prices pushed
above the congestion area on the

daily bar chart that had contained gains for better than a week.
Recent price action is very encouraging to the bulls and is a solid
sign the lows are in place in the meal market. Next resistance comes
in at the $162.00 area. First support is seen at $156.00.

July bean oil closed 7 points higher at 14.73 cents today. Prices
scored another new contract low today of 14.62 cents. Oil is still
technically weaker than beans or meal right now. But I would be
surprised if there is much downside left in oil. Next resistance
comes in at 15.00 cents. Next support is seen at 14.50 cents.

July Chicago wheat gapped higher on the daily bar chart and closed 7
1/4 cents higher at $2.78 1/2 today. Hot and dry weather forecast for
the U.S. Plains states this week combined with a bullish USDA report
last Thursday to send prices sharply higher today. Now, odds have
increased that a double-bottom reversal on the daily bar chart will
be confirmed. The fact that wheat was technically oversold also led
to the stronger upside movement today. Prices last Wednesday touched
the contract low of $2.65. Bears still have the slight edge, but
bulls are gaining confidence rapidly. First resistance lies at the
$2.80 area. Next support is seen at $2.75.

SOFTS: July N.Y. sugar closed 9 points lower at 9.01 cents today.
Prices scored a bearish "outside day" down on the daily bar chart
today. We still could see a minor bullish pennant forming in sugar,
but prices would need to bounce right back higher soon. Bulls can
still correctly argue that today's pullback was just consolidation
amid good prices gains seen recently. A three-month high was scored
in July sugar just recently. A six-week-old uptrend line is still in
place on the daily bar chart. Next resistance now comes in at 9.15
cents--today's high. First support is seen at 8.80 cents.

July N.Y. coffee closed 3.40 cents lower at 64.25 cents today. Prices
gapped lower on the daily bar chart and let some of the air out of
the bulls' balloon. They had gained momentum lately. Not much
technical damage will occur if prices can rebound, but if good
follow-through selling occurs Tuesday, then odds significantly
increase that prices will test the recent lows. First support comes
in at 62 cents. First resistance is seen at 67.00 cents-- today's
high.

July N.Y. cocoa closed $10 higher today, at $1,024. Prices scored a
corrective "inside day" on the daily bar chart today, following
Friday's big sell off. The bears wanted to see follow-through selling
today to confirm a bearish key reversal down on the daily bar chart,
but that did not occur. Bulls and bears are still on a level playing
field. Next resistance comes in at $1,062. First support is now seen
at $1,000.

July cotton closed 153 points higher at 46.70 cents today. Hot and
dry weather in the cotton-growing regions of the U.S. combined with a
technically oversold condition on the market to push prices solidly
higher today. The cotton market will be like the grains. Prices are
so depressed that traders will be extra jumpy when any potentially
adverse weather patterns are forecast. There was good follow-through
buying today from Friday's "outside day" up on the daily bar chart,
and a key reversal up was confirmed. This gives the bulls a bit more
confidence. Cotton is still in a bear market and any rebounds may be
selling opportunities for the bears. Let's see what happens this
week. My bias is still that we are not that far from a bottoming
process. Next resistance lies at 48.00 cents. First support now is
seen around 45.00 cents. Would-be bottom-pickers should still beware.

July orange juice futures closed 30 points higher today, at 79.20
cents. Prices closed near the session high. Last week, bulls filled
an important downside gap area on the daily bar chart. They have
gained confidence after the recent price action, but will need to see
more upside action this week--pushing prices above 80 cents--to gain
solid momentum. Next resistance is seen at 80.00 cents. Next support
comes in at 77.60 cents--today's low.

July lumber futures closed the limit of $10.00 higher again today, at
$324.80. Prices today again gapped higher and hit a new for-the-move
high. Bulls are really snorting now. Expect more volatility, as is
typical for this market. The next upside objective for the bulls is
now the $330.00 area, and then $335.00. First support is seen at the
$315.00 area. This is a fun market to watch from the sidelines. But
the volatility can be a killer to those who are caught on the wrong
side of the lumber market.

METALS: June COMEX gold closed up $0.40 today, at $268.70. Prices
corrected a bit more today after last Wednesday's strong gains that
pushed prices to a two-month high. This market is in a nice uptrend
since scoring its early-April low. Recent price action is what bulls
needed to gain confidence to trek farther north on the chart. Next
resistance is located at $271.10--the recent high. First support is
seen at $266.00.

July silver closed up $0.02 today, at $4.357 an ounce. Same story:
Silver prices are not that far above the contract low. Prices are
chopping at lower levels, and this suggests a "basing" action that
many markets need to change the trend from down, to sideways, to
eventually up. Next support is seen at $4.30. First resistance is
seen at $4.425. Bears have the advantage.

July N.Y. copper closed 85 points lower today, at 75.50 cents. A
bearish U.S. economic report today pulled copper prices down to a new
contract low. The stock market and the U.S. economy will have to be
healthy before the bulls can really get something going in copper.
Next resistance is seen at 77.00 cents. Next support is seen at 75.00
cents.

ENERGIES: July crude closed $0.06 higher at $29.13 today. Bulls and
bears are still at a stand-off, but bulls will gain the edge on a
move above $29.50. Expect more choppy trading. Next support is seen
at 28.00. Next resistance lies at $29.50.

July heating oil closed 86 points lower today, at .7566. Bulls still
have the slight edge. Look for more choppy trading in the near
future. Next support is seen at 74.00 cents. Next resistance is seen
at 78.00 cents.

July unleaded gasoline closed 302 points lower at .9428 today. After
prices scored a new contract high last week, they have sold off
dramatically. The increase in volatility at higher price levels
suggests a topping process in the market. Bulls have lost their edge.
Next support is seen at $.9200. First resistance is seen at $.9600.

July natural gas closed 11.5 cents higher at $4.465 today. After,
prices hit a fresh five-and-one-half-month low last Wednesday, we've
seen corrective consolidation. Bears still have the edge. Next
support is seen at $4.20 and first resistance is at $4.60.

STOCKS, FINANCIALS, CURRENCIES: The June Euro currency closed 20
points lower at .8740 today. Prices pushed to another fresh four-week
low today. Bears have the edge. My bias is still that there is not
much downside left in the Euro, but the markets are always right, so
we'll see. Next support is now seen at .8700. Next resistance is seen
at .8850.

The June Japanese yen closed 47 points lower at .8143 today. Bears
are in control. Bulls are hoping for some "basing" activity at lower
levels, and that may be occurring, although it's too early to tell.
Next support now lies at the .8100 level. First resistance is seen at
the .8326 level.

The June Swiss franc closed 10 points lower at .5713. Bears are in
command. Prices pushed to a fresh 5.5-month low today, and took out
the mid-April low of .5702. If we see follow-through selling to push
prices significantly below today's low, that a bearish signal and
portends significantly more downside. A 4.5-month-old downtrend line
is in place on the daily bar chart, and it has accelerated recently.
Next support is seen at the .5700 level. First resistance comes in at
the .5800 level.

The June Australian dollar futures closed 22 points lower at .5193
today. Prices pushed to a fresh two-month high last Thursday and the
bulls have the advantage as a six- week-old uptrend line is in place
on the daily bar chart. First resistance is now seen at .5300. First
support is now seen at .5150.

The June Canadian dollar closed 4 points lower today, at .6444. Bulls
are losing momentum as prices correct from the push to the May high.
They still have the slight edge, on a short-term basis, but they will
lose it if they can't turn prices at least sideways this week. This
currency had been near recent historic lows and I do not think there
is much more downside. Next resistance is seen at the .6500 level.
First support is seen at the .6400 level.

The June British pound closed 4 points lower at 1.4182. Trading
continues choppy at lower levels. As prices approach the lower
portion of the recent trading range, strong support should kick in
and provide for a bounce. But if prices fall below the early April
low of 1.4112, then the door is open to much steeper losses. This
currency was not that far above recent historic lows and I do not
think there is much more downside in the sterling. One could still
argue that price action the past few weeks has been a "basing" before
prices eventually turn north. A move below 1.4100 would be considered
a bearish downside breakout. Next support is now seen at the 1.4112
level. Next resistance comes in at the 1.4270 level.

The June U.S. dollar index closed 24 points higher at 117.22 today.
Prices also pushed to a fresh four-week high again today. Next
resistance lies at the 117.70 level. First support is seen at the
115.50 area. My bias is still that there is not much upside left in
the dollar index. But this week technical odds have increased that a
new high will be scored. We'll see. Markets are never wrong--
analysts are.

June U.S. T-bonds closed 14/32 higher today at 99 20/32. Prices
scored a corrective "inside day" today after Friday's price crash to
a six-month low. All eyes are on this week's FOMC meeting, at which a
decision will be made on whether or not to cut interest rates.
Trading will likely be subdued up to the time of the announcement,
which is set to occur tomorrow afternoon. Short-term indicators show
the market is still overdone on the downside, but nobody should stand
in front of a steaming locomotive. Longer-term charts do show good
support at the 99 even area. First resistance is now seen at 100
even-- or "par."

The June U.S. T-note closed up 12.0 (32nds) today at 103.11.0. Prices
scored a corrective "inside day" after crashing to a five-month low
Friday. Bears have the edge now, as severe technical damage has been
inflicted this week. First support is seen at the 102.29.0 level.
First resistance is seen at 103.16.0 area.

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store  - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________

T O P   N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________

STOCKS

Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei falls 1.2% closing below 14000 line
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25475
US Equities Review:Mixed ahead of Fed; volume lightest this yr
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25482
UK Stocks Review: Program trade sends FTSE diving in auction
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25481

FOREX

US FX Review: Dollar strong ahead of expected Fed rate cuts
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25477
Asia FX Review: Trading locked in a range in Asia ahead of FOMC
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25474
Europe FX Review: Market on hold ahead of Fed rate decision
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25476

CREDIT

US Credit Review: Ends 2-day down streak as awaits Fed meet
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25472
Europe Credit Review: Mkt falls ahead of Fed rate decision
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25478
Japan Credit Review: June climbs as longer paper outperforms
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25480

COMMODITIES

US Futures Summary: Natural gas, grains rally; gasoline dives
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25479

EXCHANGES

CME, CBOE Create Joint Venture On Single-Stock Futures
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24447
New Rules Proposed For Derivatives Clearing Organizations
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24446
Holland's Essent Energy Joins EEX Exchange
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24445

____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/

WINNERS

LBK1   Random Length Lumber May 2001              335.00     16.00  +5.02
ZM1    U.S. Treasury 6% Bond Jun 2001          103 184/256    4 3/32  +4.11
NGM1   Henry Hub Natural Gas Jun 2001              4.394     0.157  +3.67
CTN1   Cotton Jul 2001                             46.70      1.58  +3.50
XEV1   Soybean Meal Oct 2001                       149.2       4.8  +3.29
CK1    Corn May 2001                             195 1/2     5 3/4  +3.03
SMN2   Soybean Meal Jul 2002                         150       4.3  +2.95
KWK1   Wheat May 2001                            332 1/2     9 1/2  +2.94
SK1    Soybeans May 2001                             463        13  +2.89
WN1    Wheat Jul 2001                                279     7 3/4  +2.86

LOSERS

KCU1   Coffee 'C' Sep 2001                         67.15     -3.60  -5.11
PAM1   Palladium Jun 2001                         627.00    -30.00  -4.57
HUM1   New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline Jun 20    1.0098   -0.0391  -3.72
AFN1   Aluminum Jul 2001                          0.7000   -0.0200  -2.78
NKM1   Nikkei 225 Stock Avg Jun 2001               13780      -350  -2.48
NDZ1   NASDAQ 100 Index Dec 2001                 1835.00    -41.50  -2.21
ERY0   FTSE Eurotop 100 Cash                        3250     -63.7  -1.92
XWK1   Wheat May 2001                            269 1/2    -4 1/2  -1.71
DAK2   BFP Milk May 2002                           11.55     -0.20  -1.70
CLM2   Light Sweet Crude Oil Jun 2002              25.93     -0.39  -1.51
____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/

WINNERS

SMTI   SMTEK INTL INC                               7.50      2.38  +46.48
ALCO   ALICO, INC                                  22.80      4.32  +23.29
HSE    HS RESOURCES                                64.43     11.15  +20.93
IMNR   IMMUNE RESPONSE                              5.95      0.99  +20.41
INOD   INNODATA CORP                                6.25      0.86  +16.10
ADLR   ADOLOR CORP                                 16.66      2.11  +14.55
FMT    FREMONT GENL                                 5.93      0.73  +14.04
WFII   WIRELESS FACILITIES(IPO)                     6.52      0.81  +13.64
COD    Chiles Offshore Inc                         24.63      2.88  +13.24
INGN   Introgen Therapeutics                        6.93      0.80  +13.05

LOSERS

PPDI   PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT DEVLPMT              31.32    -31.34  -100.03
ENMD   ENTREMED INC                                15.30     -4.00  -20.78
MAXC   MAXCO INC                                    7.50     -1.43  -19.07
NEWP   NEWPORT CORP                                36.61     -6.30  -14.68
GGB    GERDAU S.A. ADS                              6.76     -1.09  -13.90
RZYM   RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS                     7.58     -1.21  -13.81
MATX   MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL                        8.62     -1.31  -13.23
HYGS   Hydrogenics Corp                             5.78     -0.86  -13.13
ARBA   ARIBA INC                                    6.03     -0.87  -12.61
CGPI   COLLAGENEX PHARMACEUTICALS                   7.24     -0.99  -12.22

FREE MANAGED FUTURES & IRA RETIREMENT KIT
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/
_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=mike.grigsby@enron.com&list=evening

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Green Mountain prudency has been approved by Lavo.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:09 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: RE: LT Ercot Schedule C

fine

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Tue 5/29/2001 12:56 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: FW: LT Ercot Schedule C

I need approval for this ERCOT Schedule C.   The e-mail from Stacey outlines the details.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:   Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:18 AM
To:     Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:        FW: LT Ercot Schedule C

Kevin,

This is for the full requirements uncertainty associated with green mountain and includes a reserve against teh liabilitiy exposure for the QSE agreements.

Please let me know if you have any other questions,

Doug

 -----Original Message-----
From:   White, Stacey
Sent:   Friday, May 25, 2001 3:56 PM
To:     Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:        LT Ercot Schedule C

Did you get this reserve cleared through Lavorato?  If you have not, can you do so immediately.

Thanks,
Stacey
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey W White/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 03:54 PM ---------------------------

Untitled Attachment
Andrea Dahlke@ENRON
05/11/2001 01:59 PM
To:     Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:     Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Casey Evans/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:        LT Ercot Schedule C

Chris and Anita-

I created a Schedule C in LT-Ercot today for ($1,713,647) relating to the BP Energy/ Green Mountain transaction.  The reserve is broken out as follows:

Description                     Volume          Reserve         Amount
Energy Reserve          (623,144)               $1.50                   ($934,717)
Ancillary Reserve               (623,144)               $1.00                   ($623,144)
QSE Reserve                     (623,144)               $0.25                   ($155,786)
TOTAL                                                                   $1,713,647

Power Structuring as provided the following amortization schedule for these reserves:

Untitled Attachment
Let me know if you have any questions.

Andrea


I think I can, I think I can.  Yes, I can send you the power point slide
presentation and outline I sent to Rick and Jim.

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 04/09/2001 11:08
AM ---------------------------

Paul Kaufman
04/06/2001 05:07 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: DRAFT Outline and PP Slides--Briefing Package

Here's our draft briefing book.  Ignore Jeff's power point attachment and use
the following.  As Jeff states, this is a work in progress.  We'll need some
assistance next week to clean things up and finalize.

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 04/06/2001 05:03
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/06/2001 06:43 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DRAFT Outline and PP Slides--Briefing Package

I've focused my attention on editing the outline, which is about 60-75%
complete.  Haven't touched the slides---they'll require substantially more
work; but we shouldn't have any problem putting it to bed by end of next
week.  Have a good weekend.

Best,
Jeff


Jane, I just faxed the January penalty support.  Also, you mentioned that we
should be billing penalties on the trigger deal - 386140 (EPNG - Blanco
Supply Area).  However, this deal is linked to the same contract as the
penalty for the nomination error.  I have checked the contract again, and all
of the exhibits are expired.  In addition, I cannot find an exhibit which
covers EPNG-Blanco Supply Area.  Given this information, would you still like
me to bill the penalty, and if so, at what rate?

Thanks for your help
Laurie


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042005.txt


Lauren Hagerty is in Houston today and will provide us with the necessary
documentation for opening of the account.  We will advise when the
information is received.  Thanks.  Sara


I didn't search this long list of addressees to see if you were included.  In
case this is going only to Peggy, I thought that I would forward this since
she is still on vacation.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 09:35 AM
---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 09:27 AM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate,
Andrew R Conner/ENRON@enronXgate, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lovvorn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Winston Cheng/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Neal/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H
Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan
W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Bo
Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel Reck/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzy
Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cash@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=751065A6-3F9B3C39-86256496-4
BE6BF@EX@enronXgate, Brad Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Angie
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Halgren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jung-Suk Suh/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron,
Graham@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=5B160532-1CBDFACE-86256714
-61C37F@EX@enronXgate, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann
Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Vance L
Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Donald P Reinhardt/ENRON@enronXgate, John Craig
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adam
Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Horowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barend
VanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, James R Barker/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B
Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES,
Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Sunil
Dalal/ENRON@enronXgate, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi
DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joanie H
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J
Hanson/ENRON@enronXgate, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Eubanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew
Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Martin O'Leary/HOU/EES@EES, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jay
Knoblauh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned Higgins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan
McCairns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ragan Bond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Greer/ENRON@enronXgate, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Mandola/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea
Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Kyle/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Lantz
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace L
Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Green/HPL/Enron@Enron,
Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa
Seibel/ENRON@enronXgate, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, rmservices@Enron,
Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, James
Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Todd W
Lambert/HOU/EES@EES, Morgan Babin/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L
Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Laura R Arnold/HOU/EES@EES, Jay Blaine/HOU/EES@EES,
Zarin Imam/HOU/EES@EES, Jesus Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Bangle/HOU/EES@EES, Rhonda Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES,
Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Sherry
Pendegraft/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Weithman/DUB/EES@EES, C Kyle Griffin/HOU/EES@EES, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernard Dahanayake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Salinas/HOU/EES@EES, Josephine M Logan/DUB/EES@EES, Joni Fisher/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/EES@EES, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica
Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Gregg Penman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Watch List--3/20/01

Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 3/19/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Will you check our systems and invoice for July for the Citizens Griffith deal and let me know what we have billed/paid citizens and PPL for July 17th and July 26.  There are some significant discrepancies with these counterparties that need to be addressed ASAP.  Please let me know what you find.  You can call me at x30685.

thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saucier, Darla
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE:

Hey Kim,

Please contact Megan Parker from now on for Citizens.  I will be helping transition this off to her, but most of the activity needs to be addressed with her.

Thanks!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Saucier, Darla
Subject:

darla,

can you send me the invoice for the griffith stuff for July?  I think I need to make a change.

Thanks,

Kim


britt,

thanks your notes below.

re bug issue - noted. just one question; do you think we should notify our
suppliers in view that, if there is a problem as a result of the bugs, we
will have to proceed against them??? they would want to have a rep to view
the testing as well, i would think.

re joint testing - pls copy eric tan on what needs to be done once a decision
is made on where/when the testing will be done.

re freight payment - before offering to just pay the $500,000, do you think
we should propose it be paid to an interest bearing escrow account pending
the results of the joint testing (or whatever other "pending" limitation you
think might help us)??

rgds

From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 09/11/2000 07:26 PST
To: Paul Henking/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P
Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

Paul,

Thanks for your e-mail.  Parenthetically, I'd be happy to explain how we got
to where we are on our strategy; maybe a telephone call would be best.  Let
me know when you are available.  I can call you early a.m. or late p.m.

Re the bug issue:  we were aware of this, although I am interested to hear
that SGS raised it with you and Eric in mid-October.  I have discussed this
in the past with David Best, and spoke with him on the telephone this morning
about what SGS told you.  We don't think we should put anyone on notice about
the bug issue unless and until it appears and is confirmed at the joint
testing.  Otherwise, we may be raising an inherent vice argument for both
Mitsubishi and our own cargo underwriters.   Let me know if you have a
different view (on this or anything else I put in this e-mail).

Re Mitsubishi's response to our settlement demand:  David Best has just
spoken with Sian Heard, Mitsubishi's lead London solicitor.  It is clear from
her that Mitsubishi will not be settling prior to instituting arbitration.
It is also clear that Mitsubishi will not consider any substantial settlement
without Heard's advice.  Best believes that Heard will recommend that the
joint testing take place before giving Mitsubishi an exposure evaluation.  In
sum, while our attempt at settlement prior to joint testing was a worthwhile
effort, to avoid the risk and expense of the problematic joint survey, it now
appears to David and me to be at a dead end.

Re the joint testing:  Again, David and I believe that the joint testing
should proceed as quickly as it can be arranged.  Neither our cargo
underwriters nor Mitsubishi will move off dead center unless we do so.  Given
the problems with SGS's lab in Singapore, the "bug" issue that SGS in Subic
Bay has raised (again), and that SGS did the pre-purchase of product for ECT
that proved off-spec, I have asked David to re-visit with Steve Jones, our
chemist, the logistics and cost of having the testing done in the U.K.  I
have also asked him to consider whether Heard might be amenable to splitting
the costs of transporting the samples from Singapore to the U.K.  I would
like to get ECT's authority quickly to authorize the joint testing to go
forward.

Re the selection of arbitrators:  David has discussed three Q.C.s that he and
Neale agreed were appropriate with Hearn.  Of those three, Hearn likes
Nicholas Hamblin, who will charge 275 pounds an hour, and $1,750 pounds per
day.  She will be conferring with Mitsubishi about using him as the sole
arbitrator.  Given that we have initiated a good-faith discussion of the
choice of arbitrators with Mitsubishi, David advises that we do not need to
worry about sending Mitsubishi a letter tomorrow with our choices of
arbitrator on it.  We can wait for Hearn to respond, then I will make a
formal request for your authority to agree to one arbitrator who has already
been accepted by Mitsubishi.

Re the without-prejudice settlement of Mitsubishi's freight and demurrage:  I
read you loud and clear (and thanks for making clear that the freight claim
is only about $500,000, not $760,000, as I had inadvertantly indicated in my
last e-mail).  As I previously mentioned, David and I are on board with this
idea, given the difficult circumstances of this case.

Let me know if I have inadvertantly mischaracterized anything you said.

Britt

	Paul Henking@ECT
	11/09/2000 02:25 AM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P
Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

britt,

thanks your reply which is noted. you will notice i have excluded david best
and ngregson (?) preferring to keep my comments in house as privileged info,
unless you feel this msg should be forwarded to them later.

firstly, i am getting nowhere with mitsubishi on the settlement front. i have
gone so far as to mention this morning to mitsuru that if this does goes to
arbitration, and should mitsubishi succeed in their position, this will only
serve to increase our claim by a similar amount since these costs would then
become part of our contamination claim. he seems quite content to let this go
to arbitration. as an example, he was suppose to call me back this afternoon
but did not.

secondly, with regards to your comments, i would just respond/add the
following information:

1. i don't know if i am switching tactics so much as following what should
have been done in the beginning (i.e. submit the claim to our insurance
company and let them proceed against the owners). i honestly feel the
arbitrators will say, "pay the freight (and possibly the demurrage now) and
settle the contamination claim as a separate issue". clearly, the c/p says
that freight is due without deduction once the vessel has completed discharge.

on the issue of the "pre-sale" survey, i have discussed this matter
internally with eric tan. seems our position is that singapore considered the
sample that was drawn as a bad sample as well as we were not sure that the
test methods used conformed with the testing methods required for first gas.
this position is proved by the loading of the pacific virgo when the product
subsequently tested on-spec for first gas. granted, it might still become an
issue but, as you say. it could become an issue in either proceeding.

i am getting a little confused on the matter of the joint testing. verbally i
was advised that enron did not want to have the joint testing - at least not
on a prompt basis. your msg now says that we do want to test the product and
it should be done as soon as possible (as mitsubishi - and your advices that
the underwriters and hear owner's p and i club would want). i assume this
change is the result of the arbitration.

be that as it may, i do have a bit of information that you may, or may not,
be aware of or find relevant. when eric tan and i visited first gas in
mid-oct to meet the personnel at first gas and witness one of the cargoes
being discharged at the plant, we also took the opportunity to meet with sgs
in subic bay to see their facilities and meet their personnel. during the
conversation the subject of the elang cargo came up and the comment from sgs
is that they were fairly certain it was off-spec due to "bugs". this may
sound silly but i have heard of this before and is a problem with petroleum
products.

it seems sgs even went so far as to test the product themselves for these
"bugs" and got a positive result. this test was not requested by enron or
first gas and was done some time later in this process. i understand there
may be some concern on our part over our subsequent sales to third parties if
we knew there were bugs in the product. i would have to say that this was not
known at the time and even today is only conjecture based on sgs' advices
mid-oct (well after these sales). sgs also described "changes" to the product
which would fit with the cargo having bugs (i.e. a strong sulphur smell and
change in colour).

if the testing is now done, i do not know if these bugs will be detected or
not. however, if they are in the ship's samples, they may have changed the
sample sufficiently that even a visual observation may detect the problem.
the next problem becomes proving from where the bugs originated. were they in
the previous cargo tanks that were not cleaned properly? or were they in the
condensate when the cargo was loaded? obviously, testing of the shore sample
prior to loading will determine the answer. if the shore sample is ok, then
they had to come from the ship. if the shore sample also has bugs, then we
should be claiming against our suppliers.

this of course assumes the suggestion put forth by sgs is in fact correct.
just something else to be considered.

2) i am not saying that we pay the full amount immediately but only the
freight portion (about $500,000). we then advise mitsubishi (or their
lawyers) that we will now review the demurrage claim (about $260,000) and
revert by say end nov. the demurrage claim has been sent to our london
office's demurrage department and i have asked them for their comments on the
claim. after all, there may be issues with the ship's pumping performance or
simple laytime errors which may reduce the demurrage claim. they will try to
get me a response before the weekend.

in this manner, we pay part of the money but still have a smaller portion
which we may apply against our claim once the test results are known. i will
leave this to legal as to decide how the approach to mitsubishi or their
lawyers should be made

rgds


Here are the counts of trades executed before 4:00 pm, each day, through the Month of October:

TRADE DATE	TRADE CNT
10/1/2001	5245
10/2/2001	5405
10/3/2001	5953
10/4/2001	6487
10/5/2001	5854
10/6/2001	17
10/7/2001	53
10/8/2001	5117
10/9/2001	5280
10/10/2001	6261
10/11/2001	5950
10/12/2001	6107
10/13/2001	16
10/14/2001	19
10/15/2001	5428
10/16/2001	7155
10/17/2001	7425
10/18/2001	7654
10/19/2001	7988
10/20/2001	4
10/21/2001	34
10/22/2001	7916
10/23/2001	8567
10/24/2001	8001
10/25/2001	8405
10/26/2001	6792
10/27/2001	12
10/28/2001	8
10/29/2001	7152
10/30/2001	5754

Additionally, the attached spreadsheet shows counts of trades executed before 4:00 pm, by counterparty, for the prior two weeks.  In addition, the first two columns show the daily average trade count for the respective counterparty, and the percentage of that average executed today.


To be added at the end of our insert regarding Transfers:

Party B may transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreement, in
whole but not in part, to any Affiliate provided that no such assignment
shall relieve Party B of its obligations hereunder and Party B shall be
continue to be responsible for such Affiliate's obligations hereunder unless
Party A approves of such Affiliate in writing, which approval may be withheld
by Party A at Party A's sole discretion.

Let me know what you think.  Also, we may want to think about adding a
provision to our form that states that ENA would be released of any
obligations under the ISDA in the event it assigns the ISDA to an Affiliate
so long as the Enron Corp. Guaranty stays in place.

Jason


Sam-
Here is a little something about my grandfather:

 Dr Walter Herschel Burgess was a 1950 graduate of Alabama Polytechnic
Institute, now Auburn University.  He practied vetinary medicine for 38 years
in Haleyville, Alabama.  Dr. Burgess was blessed with 3 children, 2
grandchildren and one great grandchild.  Dr. Burgess was an avid golfer and
tremendous football fan.  He held Auburn football season tickets for 50
years.  Dr. Burgess recently received the golden eagle from Auburn University
in recognition of 50 years of alumni service.  Dr Burgess was a World War II
veteran.  Dr. Burgess loved Auburn and sent all three of his children and
both grandchildren to school on the plains.  Due to his love for Auburn that
he instilled in his family, there will definitely be a forth generation
Auburn graduate in the Burgess family.  Dr. Burgess was also a proud member
of the OTS vetinary fraternity at Auburn University.  Dr. Burgess was born in
Cullman County, Alabama and was a 50 year resident of Haleyville, Alabama.

Please feel free to take some liberties and rearrange or omit some of the
things I stated above.  Thanks again Sam for all of your help with this and
the recognition this newsletter will give my grandfather.  Auburn is very
fortunate to have such a great person raising money for the most important
school within the University. Talk to you soon.
PL


Jeff:

As of yesterdays mail I have not received anything!
Do we need to  let Hartford know of the delay?
There will also probably be a couple of days delay due to processing the check at the bank down here!

Please, let me know!
	Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 12:25 PM ---------------------------

JJJSMD@aol.com on 03/18/2001 10:36:59 PM
To:	JSCHWIE@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Hartford Ins. premium due

Hi Jim,
I am sending a partial (quarterly) payment this time.
I would appreciate you taking care of this as you have in the past .
As always thankyou for your help in this matter.
Call me if there are any problems
Jeff
ps its due by the 25th of March


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
05/14/2001 01:26 PM
To: V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louis Dicarlo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Santiago
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alexandra
Villarreal/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean
Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil
DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Lisk/NA/Enron@Enron, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan Sutherland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shannon Groenewold/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelly
Mendel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Christiansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Evans/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vineet Arora/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth A
Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tushar Dhruv/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra
Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry
Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia
Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Ruthann
Frausto/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-17-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Andrea Ring

Login ID:  hulahoop1

Extension:  35775

Office Location:  3223E

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  No

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  No
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  No
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)? No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  Mailbox

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 7:00am     To:   5:00pm

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?  No
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


FYI:  Rick agreed with the attached note that I sent him.  By voice mail, I
suggested Ted Murphy as a substitute for Rick Buy for the meeting.  We are
set for next Thursday, August 17 at 11:45 in Rick Causey's office over
lunch.  I am meeting with Ted this afternoon to fill him in on the purpose of
the meeting and to be certain that I have his support.  Rick Causey suggested
citing some of the items in my memo to him when we get with Frevert.  Any
words of wisdom or suggestions for the meeting?

Hope that everything is fun and relaxing in Maine.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 02:10 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           08/10/2000 04:17 PM

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Meeting with Mark Frevert - Should We Move It Up?

Not surprisingly, the organization is moving faster than Rick Buy's vacation
schedule.  Our meeting is set with Mark Frevert, Rick Buy, you and me on
August 28 -- two weeks from next Monday, dictated by Rick Buy's schedule.  I
am concerned that waiting that long to get with Mark to discuss the potential
formalization of a global risk management operations role will put us behind
the curve.

Mike McConnell and Jeff Shankman plan to release a memo tomorrow on the
structure of the Global Markets team, which will include a discussion on
Brent's role and reporting responsibilities.  Brent and Scott Earnest are
flying to London next Monday evening to spend the remainder of the week in
that office to iron out details on supporting the global markets businesses.
Many of their discussions will be with Mike Jordan and some logical points
will be raised around co-ordination between EEL and EGM.  In a conversation
with Gary Hickerson on Tuesday regarding his business, he stated that he
wanted to be sure that I had responsibility over London operations, as he
will have support personnel in London and wants to be certain that efforts
are coordinated.  Separately, Jeff Shankman said that he was certainly
comfortable with Brent in the Operations/CAO role but that he wanted Brent to
report to me to ensure consistency, access to support resources and logic
around systems issues that cut across the ocean.  I told him that you and I
had had discussions about a more formalized role to encompass responsibility
for London and that we had a meeting planned with Mark Frevert on August 28.
That's a lifetime to a trader, and Jeff said he hoped that we could nail that
down before the end of the month.

What are your thoughts about an earlier meeting with Mark Frevert?  The
summary of doorstep findings can be finalized early next week.  I have
checked Mark's travel schedule.  He will be in the Houston office next week,
with Thursday, August 17 as the best day to potentially schedule a meeting.

I am not trying to rush this process, yet I know that by the end of August
much will have been decided around coordinating between ENA, EGM and EEL
operations.  I would like to be in a position to help guide those decisions,
rather than arrive at the party late.


The problems experienced on Saturday were apparently due to an imaging problem also experienced by NNG.

John Buchanan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hernandez, Bert
Sent:	Sunday, February 24, 2002 9:22 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Corman, Shelley; Draemer, Mary ; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steve; Kedwaii, Hasan; Kowalke, Terry; Nacey, Sheila; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Studebaker, James ; TMS OnCall
Cc:	Giambrone, Laura; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Christopher L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	TW WEEKEND NOTES

Please see the attached file for the weekend notes of February 23rd and 24th.  If you received this message and no longer need to be included on the distribution, contact one of the members of the TW team.

Thanks,  Bert		 << File: feb.02.xls >>


http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/articles.html?id=001106001596&query=
electricity+board


And what exactly did we mean by "English major finally coming into use"??

Anyways, it sucks that most all of the UT games out here are on friggin Pay
Per View.  But I think I will have the distinct pleasure of getting to watch
the UT-A&M game in a house full of A&M officers so I hope we do well.

If my leave gets approved and I can find a ticket in, I should/may be in
town from the 23DEC to 1JAN.  I'll know by tue or wed and let ya know.

What's been up with you, how's Enron treatin ya?

Brett
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Oh great, the knuckleheads at PG&E will get SoCal all spooked.  Good luck.
Thanks.  DF

03/31/2000 04:00 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
03/31/2000 04:00 PM
03/31/2000 04:00 PM
To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich
Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Cobden/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Next PG&E Meeting/SoCal

Mr. Campbell and I will meet Dr. Komai from SoCal in the late morning or
early afternoon on the 19th in San Francisco.  After our discussions we will
meet the rest of the group back at the Hyatt.  It is doubtful that Dr. Komai
will have more than a couple of hours of information to share with the group
on the 20th so we might considered targeting a departure time in
mid-afternoon.

Dr. Komai related that the PG&E press activity has caused concern at the
management level in SoCal and prompted a new round of rigorous sampling
efforts.


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Sat 11/24/2001 11:41 AM
To: Donoho, Lindy; Lokay, Michelle
Cc: Kleb, Steve; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: FW: Tw

Can either of you help me here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Sat 11/24/2001 11:33 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Cc: Taylor, Sarah; Desai, Jayshree
Subject: Tw

There are files that back up the revenue projections that Steve Kleb gave me hard copies of for 2001 and 2002.  Can I get electronic copies of these, they have volumes and margins and appear to back up the revenue projections.

2002 File looks like s\marketing\twfinmkt_anly\Tw\twfin\2001\misc\[plan_forecast_design.xls]\summary.

2001 file looks like s\marketing\twfinmkt_anly\tw\twfin\2001\forecast-CE\[ce 3-2001.xls]model _source_data.

If the same exists for 2000 can we get it as well.  I would like as soon as possible and you can email to the cc addresses as well.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)