To all:

The current model is discounting the financial contracts improperly.  The financial contracts based on a contract month is being discounted an extra 50 days on average.   We are currently working on a process to correct the model by next month.

Please call me or Chris Abel if you have questions.

Thanks
Anita

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 02:50 PM ---------------------------

 	Anita Luong 06/01/2001 11:38 AM

To:	Sally Beck/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott Earnest/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Fondren/Enron@EnronXGate, Gary Hickerson/Enron@EnronXGate, Georgeanne Hodges/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES, Clara Carrington/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank Prejean/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	ERMS Discount Memo as of May 25, 2001

Attached is the ERMS Discounting Analysis as of May 25, 2001.

Please call Chris Abel at X33102 or Anita Luong at X-36753 if you have questions.

Thanks


Sara/Cheryl,
 ECT Investments Inc has received a faxed document from Goldman Sachs
International  regarding terms of business for executing equity transactions
through the London office.  This document is not intended for the purposes of
opening up a new executing broker accouunt with Goldman Sachs International.
ECT Investments Inc currently has an existing executing broker agreement with
Goldman Sachs & Co which should cover trades done in Houston and London since
we are trading under the same legal entity.  The Terms of Business Letter
sets forths terms and conditions that would apply to transactions executed by
ECT Investments in London which is governed under the SFA rules and
regulations.
 I will forward a copy of the document to Cheryl.  Goldman Sachs
International is waiting for us to review and sign.  If you have additional
questions and concerns, I can be reached at extension 31439.

Thanks,
Theresa


Start Date: 10/6/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100613.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


As you can see,we are playing hardball with Oaktree. Any comments?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 12:17 PM -----

	SHoward@milbank.com
	05/16/2000 08:19 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Draft letter to Swartz

Richard:

Please see the attached draft letter to Mike Swartz.? Give us your thoughts.

Some background:? When Roland told Mike Swartz that we were not going to turn
cartwheels to produce Enron witnesses to, effectively, Farallon's counsel, he
got quite huffy.? Shortly after that, I received a call from Oaktree's
General Counsel reminding me of Enron's responsibilities under the Release.?
You may get a call also, from either Ken Liang or Brian Berman.

In the meantime, as you will see from the attached draft, we have discovered
that the Release it clearly provides that Oaktree will not disclose anything
it learns from Enron to it co-plaintiff Farallon.? Given that, how can
Hennegan interview Brian--is he promising not to tell his client Farallon
what he learns on behalf of his client Oaktree?? I think we are on good
grounds, but we definitely should talk about this.

Steve?

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Tellis, Roland
Sent:?? Tuesday, May 16, 2000 5:57 PM
To:???? Howard, Steve
Subject:??????? Draft letter to Swartz

 <<3_CKX01!.DOC>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - 3_CKX01!.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Jester/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
01:37 PM ---------------------------

Don Baughman@ECT
12/11/2000 04:00 PM
To: shannontyer@email.msn.com, mstewart@pdq.net, reidstav@houston.rr.com,
travieso74@hotmail.com, PRHE@DYNEGY.COM, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
twomarshalls@hotmail.com, don.c.baughman@marshmc.com,
baughmanpatricia@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject:

 - salmon.asf


I will be leaving around 5:00  on Friday for a veterinary appointment.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


missing deal for bob

buy edison mission
165.00
25 mw
feb
sp15

thanks


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034935&Page=
MyReq.


This is pretty funny.

brant

---------------------- Forwarded by Brant Reves/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 03:04
PM ---------------------------

Rob Hanlen <rhanlen@tigsecurities.com> on 02/20/2001 02:21:00 PM
To: Rob Hanlen <rhanlen@tigsecurities.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: just do it

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Freret
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Jeff Sullivan; Jon Platon; Rob Hanlen
Subject: FW: just do it

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Shivers [mailto:stephens@cpsinet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Wally Poole (E-mail); Spencer Williams; Paul Omezi; Michael Muscat;
Bradley Shivers; Lucy Green; Lise' Shivers; Jimmy Shivers; Dawn Sanders
Freret; Kellie Mitchell; GEORGE MILLER; Gary Constantine; David Lane;
Chris Freret; Chris Freret (E-mail); Butch Shivers; Brett Freret; BRYAN
ADAMS - HOME; Bryan Adams; Adele Bullock
Subject: Fw: just do it

Fw this one on to all, if you want to.

----- Original Message -----
From: Karen Waggoner <karenm@cpsinet.com>
To: JERRY KISER <jerryk@cpsinet.com>; JENNIFER SWEENEY
<jsweeney@cpsinet.com>; MATT JOHNSON <mattj@cpsinet.com>; STEPHEN SHIVERS
<stephens@cpsinet.com>

>
> ----- Original Message > > > Subject: just do it
> > >
> > > In the interest of full disclosure, I am usually a Nike apologist, but
> > > this
> > > killed me...
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Nike now lets you personalize your shoes by submitting a word or
> phrase
> > > > >which they will stitch onto your shoes, under the swoosh.  So Jonah
> > > > >Peretti filled out the form and sent them $50 to stitch "SWEATSHOP"
> > > onto
> > > > >his shoes.
> > > > >
> > > > >Here's the responses he got... fun and games with Nike...
> > > > >
> > > > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Your NIKE iD order was cancelled for one or more of the following
> > > > >reasons:
> > > > >
> > > > >1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark or other
> > > > >intellectual property
> > > > >2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we do
not
> > > > >have the legal right to use
> > > > >3) Your Personal iD was left blank.  Did you not want any
> > > > >personalization?
> > > > >4) Your Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and
> > > > >besides, your mother would slap us.
> > > > >
> > > > >If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new
> personalization
> > > > >please visit us again at www.nike.com
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you, NIKE iD
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Greetings,
> > > > >
> > > > >My order was canceled but my personal NIKE iD does not violate any
of
> > > > >the criteria outlined in your message.  The Personal iD on my
custom
> > > > >ZOOM XC USA running shoes was the word "sweatshop."
> > > > >
> > > > >   Sweatshop is not:
> > > > >   1) another's party's trademark,
> > > > >   2) the name of an athlete,
> > > > >   3) blank, or
> > > > >   4) profanity.
> > > > >
> > > > >I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor of
> the
> > > > >children that made my shoes.  Could you please ship them to me
> > > > >immediately.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks and Happy New Year, Jonah Peretti
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Dear NIKE iD Customer,
> > > > >
> > > > >Your NIKE iD order was cancelled because the iD you have chosen
> > > > >contains, as stated in the previous e-mail correspondence,
> > > > >"inappropriate slang".  If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product
> > > with
> > > > >a new personalization please visit us again at nike.com
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you, NIKE iD
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Dear NIKE iD,
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom
ZOOM
> XC
> > > > >USA  running shoes.  Although I commend you for your prompt
customer
> > > > >service, I disagree with the claim that my personal iD was
> > > inappropriate
> > > > >slang.  After consulting Webster's Dictionary, I discovered
> > > > >that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not
slang.
> > > > >
> > > > >The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed
for
> > > > >long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions"  and its
> origin
> > > > >dates from 1892.  So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed
> in
> > > > >your first email.
> > > > >
> > > > >Your web site advertises that the NIKE iD program is "about freedom
> to
> > > > >choose and freedom to express who you are."  I share Nike's love of
> > > > >freedom and personal expression.  The site also says that "If you
> want
> > > > >it done right...build it yourself."  I was thrilled to be able to
> > > > >build my own shoes, and my personal iD was offered as a small token
> of
> > > > >appreciation for the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my
> > > > >vision.  I hope that you will value my freedom of expression and
> > > > >reconsider your decision to reject my order.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you, Jonah Peretti
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Dear NIKE iD Customer,
> > > > >
> > > > >Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the NIKE
iD
> > > > >web site that "Nike reserves the right to cancel any personal iD up
> to
> > > > >24 hours after it has been submitted".  In addition, it further
> > > > >explains:  "While we honor most personal iDs, we cannot honor every
> > > one.
> > > > >
> > > > >Some may be (or contain) other's trademarks, or the names of
certain
> > > > >professional sports teams, athletes or celebrities that Nike does
not
> > > > >have the right to use.  Others may contain material that we
consider
> > > > >inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our products.
> > > > >Unfortunately, at times this obliges us to decline personal iDs
that
> > > may
> > > > >otherwise seem unobjectionable.  In any event, we will let you know
> if
> > > > >we decline your personal iD, and we will offer you the chance to
> submit
> > > > >another."  With these rules in mind, we cannot accept
> > > > >your order as submitted.  If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD
product
> > > > >with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you, NIKE iD
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu
> > > > >   To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <nikeid_personalize@nike.com
> > > > >   Subject: RE: Your NIKE  iD order o16468000
> > > > >
> > > > >Dear NIKE iD,
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you for the time and energy you have spent on my request. I
> have
> > > > >decided to order the shoes with a different iD, but I would like to
> > > make
> > > > >one small request.  Could you please send me a color snapshot of
the
> > > > >ten-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks,
> > > > >Jonah Peretti
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ><no response>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >   As one forwarder writes:
> > > > >
> > > > >   ... this will now go round the world much farther and faster
than
> > > any
> > > > >of the adverts they paid Michael Jordan more than the entire wage
> > > packet
> > > > >of all their sweatshop workers in the world to do...
> > > > >
> > > > >   I normally avoid making a plea to pass on these things, but this
> > > time
> > > > >I say: JUST DO IT
> > > >
*********************************************************************

**********************************************************************
TIG Capital Securities is a full service broker/dealer registered with the
SEC and various states and is a member of the NASD Regulations, Inc.  TIG
Capital Securities Co. is also registered with the State of Texas Securities
Board as an Investment Advisor.  All information contained herein is for
informational purposes only and goes not constitute a solicitation, or an
offer, to sell securities or advisory services.  Such solicitation or offer
can only be made in states where TIG Capital Securities Co. is registered and
no new account will be accepted unless, and until, all local regulations have
been satisfied.  All information contained herein is for informational
purposes only.  It is not our intention to state or imply in any manner that
past results and profitability is an indication of future performance.  All
materials presented are compiled from sources believed to be reliable.
However, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.  All investments have risks so be
sure to read a!
ll material provided before investing.
**********************************************************************


Attached is a summary of my notes at the Socal meeting regarding revised window procedures.  No hand-outs were provided.

Calculation of Receipt Point Capacity
Topock  540 mmcf/d
Ehrenberg 1250 mmcf/d
Needles 800 mmcf/d
Wheeler 800 mmcf/d

New Receipt Points
Kramer Junction 200 mmcf/d
Hector Rd 50 mmcf/d
Both will be available around Feb 1

Basis of Pro-Ration-Current Windows Calculation
Currently, Gas Control provides total receipt point capacity comprised of demand forecast and injection capability and compares to maximum amount of gas that can enter system.  Gas Select prorates interstate's receipt capacity based on prior day's nominations.

New Calculation, Changes and Display
Based on operational maximum with adjustments for maintenance.  SoCal ist aking and applying the current formula for Wheeler Ridge to all the points.  Any changes to operational maximum will probably be due to maintenance and posted on Gas Select.  Customer will choose which points it wants to reduce receipts.  Operating maximums will equal demand forecast plus injections.  Demand forecast will rely on Gas Control weather forecast.  They use Weather Bank as one of their tools.

OFO Declaration
Name changes from overnomination
Can declare before any Cycle
Provide 2 hour notice
Post on Gas Select
Show OFO Calculation on Gas Select

Windows
Reason to set windows was to set limits to prevent too much gas from coming into system
Calculation based on noms which does not work well.  Lots of complaints.   People were complaining that it restricted access to the system.  Eliminating point specific calculation.  Open system to Max Oper. Limits or Contractual Limits.   Will continue to operate Wheeler Ridge under Aug 1 procedures.  No changes to Wheeler Ridge.
Due to the need to maintain operational control, an OFO will be declared when scheduled volumes are greater than the max operating capacity on any cycle.
Replace windows with operational maximum volumes.  If  CPUC approves comprehensive settlement, will post 5 days of information to anticipate OFO's
Now customers will elect which point they will back off instead of using windows.

Scheduling Changes-Nov 1
Gas Select is being rebuilt and will be an internet system in mid-2002 .  No direct dial-up.
Rollover noms-noms will be copied from cycle to cycle
Copy confirmed noms
All noms will be rolled over-will not be at discretion of 3rd party.  However, can still make  changes.  Can still upload new files.

2 Hour Notice
Socal will provide 2 hour notice on  Gas Select of OFO.  Other methods include leaving message on Socal Hotline (213-244-3900) and list of e-mail messages that can go directly to pagers.  Gas Select is official notification.  Courtesy notification is hot line and e mail.  Gas Select is a subscriber- based system mandated by CPUC and must get regulatory change to make free.
OFO's are going to be system wide and not customer specific.  OFO's can be declared intraday.  Once OFO declared, it will be kept for entire day.  Concerned that if call off, will have to put back on.  Don't want to go back and forth.  This decision may be reconsidered once they see how it works.  Many times Socal see an increase of 200 mmcf/day between Cycle 3 and 4 so they are concerned.

Scheduled vs. Capacity-Declare OFO
Nominations may not exceed 110% of expected usage.
Expected Usage is defined as usage for the same day for the prior week.  Can revise expected usage.
No interruptible storage injections allowed during OFO.
Use Elapsed Pro-Rata Rules
Expected Usage-cut nominations to 110% of expected usage so will use same day  of the prior week as proxy.  Generators need to revise expected usage.  Acceptance of changes are at the discretion of SoCal.
Flow Day Diversions don't go into effect until after Cycle 4.  Gas Control will determine if flow day diversion will be allowed.
If call OFO after cycle 3 or 4 and have interruptible storage injections, such storage will be prorationed back under the elapsed prorata rules.
Many people were concerned that interruptible storage will be severely compromised.
If OFO called , Interruptible Storage could be cut under the elapsed prorata rules as follows:

Cycle 1    Nom 1000  ; 0 cut
Cycle 2 Nom 1000; 666 cut
Cylce 3 Nom 1000; 500 cut
Windows will only be implemented during cycle 4 if OFO callled after cycle 3 and no improvement is realized.  Will allocate prorata.  Will use latest scheduled volume and will pro rate by receipt point.  In other words, if OFO declared during Cycle 1 and no relief after 3 cycles, Socal will window Cycle 4 and prorata cut. Parties will determine what gets cut on all the other cycles. For penalty purposes, actual burn from 12 o'clock to 12 o'clock will be used to calculate penalties or MAXDQ if not metered.
For OFO, assume supply delivereis day before and burn is the same day for the prior week.  Declare OFO on prior day's scheduled volume.

For an evening declaration-will use most recent available scheduled volumes.  For example:

         Flow Day 10/4                10/3 Scheduled Volumes
Cycle 1                                    Cycle 2
Cycle 2                                     Intraday 1
Cycle 3				evening cyle 2 on 10/4
Cycle 4                                     Intraday 1 on 10/4

In other words, will look at evening cycle 2 scheduled volumes on the 3rd for declaring OFO on cycle 1 for the 4th.; look at intra day 1 for the 3rd in declaring OFO for cycle 2 on the 4th;  look at evening cycle 2 on 10/4 in declaraing OFO for Cycle 3 on the 4th;  look at intraday 1 on the 4th in declaraing OFO on cycle 4 for the 4th.

Winter Balancing Rules
Effective Nov 1-March 31
No changes.
All customers must comply.
Minimum delivery requirements
50% of daily usage over 5 day period; (Nov 1-5;6-10;)
70% of daily usage depending on storage level
70% daily usage implemented when storage levels equal 20 bcf above peak day min
90% of daily usage depending on storage level
90% rule implemented when storage levels equal 5 bcf  plus peak day min.
Look at storage graph on Gas Select.  Posted 24 hours in advance if the minimum daily is changed.  If go to 70% , current 5 day cycle must end completely, before new % goes into effect.
Must increase storage inventory by 1 bcf above the 70% before going back to 50% rule.
Once 90% rule implemented, will return to 70% as soon as operationally feasible,

Contracted Marketer's customer usage and delivereies are aggregated in one balancing account.

Core Aggregation-subject to 50% daily throughout entire winter period based on DCQ.
Core-50% of daily throughput for the enitre period,; (Patrick Brown group)
Not subject to 70% and 90% rules.

2 types of gas count toward daily obligation- firm storage withdrawal and flowing gas.  As-available storage and imbalance trading do not count.

Burn=measured daily usage thru electronic measurement,
Min DQ-used if customer does not have electronic measurement.

Customer assessed  GIMB charge if total deliveries is less than 50% of total burn over 5 day period.  Customer purchases gas at daily balancing stand-by rate under  G IMB Rate Schedule which is 150% of highest Socal Border price per NGI Gas Daily plus franchise fees and other charges.  Rate is posted at end of every month.

OFO can be declared during undernom season (winter season)


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <rayfordabraham@att.com>
To: Grammer, Keith B, BMSLS <keith@att.com>, Carroll Hill <carrollhill@att.com>, aleciai@excite.com, khandy@cs.com, mlmroberts@juno.com, dburnett@ghcvb.org, jladymoses@aol.com, just4hams@aol.com
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 4:14:46 GMT
Subject:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grammer, Keith B, BMSLS
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:21 AM
> To:   Moore, Connie K, BMSLS; Hill, Carroll A, BMSLS; Garcia, Connie I,
> BMSLS; Hillman, Delores, BMSLS; Abraham, Rayford, BMSLS; May, Larene A,
> BMSTF; Anderson, Terry L, BMSLS; Lee, Lisa A, BMSLS; Johnson, Charles E,
> BMSLS; Bell, Cynathia, BMSLS; Phillips, Deborah A, BMSLS
> Subject:  RE:   NO Time?
>
>
>
> KEITH B. GRAMMER
> STRATEGIC BUSINESS MANAGER
> AT&T GROWTH MARKETS
> 713 968-5258
> keith@att.com
>
>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moore, Connie K, BMSLS
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:01 AM
> To:   Caffey, Linda; Dahlquist, Rebecca Stevens;
> David.Coffey@Broadwing.com; DEBBIE KEEFER; Fike, Gregory;
> Gossman136@aol.com; Grammer, Keith; gummiewood@msn.com;
> johnsimpkins@att.net; Lewis, Martha; ottorocket94@hotmail.com;
> sbb118@msn.com
> Subject:    NO Time?
>
>
>            << File: ATT01811.jpg >>
>
>
>
>
>           I don't think I know 10 people who would admit they
> love Jesus.
>           Do You Love Him?
>           This is a simple test:
>           IFYOU LOVE JESUS, SEND THIS TO AT LEAST 10 PEOPLE,
> INCLUDING THE PERSON WHO SENT IT TO YOU!
>           THE POEM
>           I knelt to pray but not for long,
>           I had too much to do.
>           I had to hurry and get to work
>           For bills would soon be due.
>           So I knelt and said a hurried prayer,
>           And jumped up off my knees.
>           My Christian duty was now done
>           My soul could rest at ease.
>           All day long I had no time
>           To spread a word of cheer.
>           No time to speak of Christ to friends,
>           They'd laugh at me I'd fear.
>           No time, no time, too much to do,
>           That was my constant cry,
>           No time to give to souls in need
>           But at last the time, the time to die.
>           I went before the Lord,
>           I came, I stood with downcast eyes.
>           For in his hands God held a book;
>           It was the book of life.
>           God looked into his book and said
>           "Your name I cannot find.
>           I once was going to write it down...
>           But never found the time"
>
>           Now do you have the time to pass it on?
>
>
>
>           Ken
>
>
>
>           +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>           The information transmitted is intended only for the
> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
> by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any
> copies of this document.
>           +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/08/2001
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Sara Davidson@ECT
02/08/2001 09:35 AM
To: BCC
cc:  (bcc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: Save the Date!

_____________________________________________________________________

Enron Law Conference
2001

May 2-4, 2001
Westin Riverwalk
San Antonio, Texas

Look for RSVP forms the end of February via e-mail.

_______________________________________________________________________


There are some conflicts with the draft date, so we will probably need to
have it on a different date.  Please tell me if you prefer 9/2 ( the day
before the season starts) or 8/20.  We could also do it during the week, but
it will probably takle 3 or 4 hrs.

Let me know suggestions.


Erin,
Thanks.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Erin Rice @ ENRON                           07/12/2000 11:09 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your Transcript

Attached is the transcript of your eSpeak.  It was a great session!

Thanks!

- er


In another surprise move, the PUC approved an Edison bailout today on a 5-0 vote.  This item was not on the Commission's agenda other than as a placeholder regarding "litigation."  We do not have copies of the agreement but we just talked to Edison's SVP of Regulatory Affairs and here's a summary:

The Commission will keep current rates in place through 2003
Any "overcollection" resulting from keeping current rates in place will go to paying off $3.3 B in Edison's past due accounts (the so-called "undercollection")
If Edison collects the $3.3B prior to 2003, then rates can change
If Edison has not collected the $3.3 B by the end of 2003, the PUC will create a dedicated rate component on all bills to collect the remainder.  Half the remainder will be collected in 2004 and the other half in 2005.
Any refunds received from litigation against suppliers will go to reducing the $3.3 B undercollection.
Edison can keep 10% of any refunds received after the $3.3B is paid off.
Edison cannot pay any dividends during the time that it is using rates to pay off the $3.3B.
Edison can apply to the PUC for approval to hedge gas price risk.
Edison will be protected from any increases in DWR contract costs (i.e., if DWR's costs go up, the PUC will raise rates rather than take it out of Edison's rates)
The PUC will not fine Edison during this period if Edison's capital structure varies from the PUC-approved capital structure
Edison must drop its lawsuits against the PUC regarding 1) the "filed rate doctrine" and 2) the so-called "TURN" accounting method, which effectively kept the rate freeze in place.
Edison agrees to "cooperate" with the Attorney General and the PUC in all litigation against suppliers.
The PUC decision could likely nullify the need for the "special" session that the Governor recently announced

We will report back with additional details as soon as we get them.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

In what will likely be viewed as a fairly shocking event, the California PUC today voted down Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC.
The vote was 4-1, with the two Republicans voting with Davis' hand-picked appointees Lynch and Wood.
Davis' proposal was introduced at the meeting by another Davis appointee--Geoff Brown--who made a lengthy speech about why California would experience economic and political destruction if the PUC did not approve Davis' proposed rate agreement.

What is Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC?
It would remove all PUC authority to review any contracts between DWR with suppliers.
It would require the PUC to pass through to utility rates all DWR power contract costs, no questions asked.

What are the implications of the move by the PUC to reject Davis' proposal?
With the vote, it remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the DWR power contracts.
The political pressure to re-negotiate--or break--the DWR power contracts is likely to intensify considerably.
It remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the $12.5 B in bonds the Treasurer has unsuccessfully attempted to issue for past several months.
Under the structure devised by Davis, the revenues flowing from the CPUC/DWR rate agreement would be used to both 1) pay for the DWR power contracts and 2) service the bonds the Treasurer is trying to issue to repay California's General Fund for spot and other short term power purchased by DWR since January.
In short, there is no clear indication of how California will pay for DWR contracts or issue the bonds.
Safe to say that today's PUC vote has seriously embarrassed Davis, and left his approach to "solving" California electricity crisis in shambles.

What Next?
A broad left-right coalition of energy interests supported a bill (18XX) that passed the Legislature with broad bi-partisan support.
The bill would create a "dedicated rate component" on every customers bill to service the $12.5 B in bonds that the Treasurer wants to issue.
Proponents of the bill--and just about everyone else--argue that the "dedicated rate component" is a signficantly more efficient way to raise the debt California needs to plug the hole in its budget.
The bill is silent, however, on how California would pay for the DWR contracts, and the bill's opponents claim that the power suppliers will sue as a result.
All four PUC commissioners who voted against the Davis rate agreement today urged Davis to sign the bill.  The left-right coalition (from Nader types to oil companies) is also working hard to get Davis to sign it.
Davis has said that he will veto the bill on the advice of the Treasurer and bond counsel.
Given today's vote, however, Davis may have no alternative than to sign the bill if he wants to get the bonds issued and the state budget repaid.

Update on Edison Bailout
Still appears that chances are very small that Edison and Davis will succeed in getting the Legislature to vote for an Edison bailout when it returns for another "special" session next Tuesday.

If you have any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


I still think an additional organizational announcement is necessary- I can
explain further when you so desire. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/11/2001 04:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

From: Enron Europe Office of the Chairman@ECT on 04/11/2001 05:37 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement@ECT
To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Dubai, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1, Enron VPs
and MDs 2, Enron Executive Committee
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

After nearly five years in London, Mark Schroeder will be returning to the US
on April 11th to join the North American Coal Business with responsibility
for origination in the utility sector.  Under Mark,s leadership, his team has
made significant contributions towards Enron Europe,s &first mover8 advantage
and its status as the leading new entrant in the liberalizing pan-European
energy markets.  We wish him well in his new commercial role.

With Mark,s departure, the day-to-day management of the Government &
Regulatory Affairs Department in Europe will rest with Peter Styles, Paul
Dawson, Paul Hennemeyer, and Doug Wood. Nick O,Day will continue in his
current leadership capacity in Japan.  Each of these five individuals and
their groups will now jointly report to the business heads and to Rick
Shapiro, in the Government & Regulatory Affairs team in Houston. Rick Shapiro
will continue to manage Government Affairs for the Americas.  While the team
members responsibilities will vary from time-to-time in response to shifting
commercial priorities, as well as the need to support other Enron Wholesale
Services' business units from time-to-time, the general areas of
responsibility will be as follows:

Peter Styles, based in Brussels, will continue to have responsibility for our
EU and Netherlands advocacy.  Paul Hennemeyer will lead efforts in the German
speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) as well as France and
Belgium. Peter and Paul will report to Eric Shaw.  While seconded to the
commercial team in France, Philip Davies will address Nordic market issues on
an ad hoc basis and also report to Paul on these issues.

Paul Dawson will lead our UK, Spain and Italian power regulatory efforts as
well as the gas regulatory work in the UK.  Doug Wood will support the
Continental Gas team and the Central and Southeastern Europe Origination
efforts, while also addressing the UK Climate Change Levy.  Doug's role in
gas will continue to be supplement, and not to supplant, the efforts of each
of the team members' geographic responsibilities noted on the organisation
chart. Paul and Doug will report to Richard Lewis locally.

Nick O,Day will also continue to report to Joe Hirl in Japan.

Other regulatory support provided by Mark Schroeder will be addressed in
another organizational announcement that will be sent
out from Government & Regulatory Affairs in Houston.  Attached is the revised
organization chart that now reflects the Government & Regulatory Affairs
organization in Enron Europe.

John Sherriff & Michael Brown

Please click on the link below to view the Regulatory Affairs organisational
charts for Europe and Japan.

Link to organisational charts


fyi

jana

Return-Path: <NAlexander@texasmonthly.emmis.com>
Received: from  rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (rly-yh01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.33])
by air-yh01.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:57:48
-0400
Received: from  texasmonthly.emmis.com (texasmonthly.emmis.com
[208.139.95.3]) by rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct
2000 18:56:49 -0400
Subject: Fw: Will You Be The Difference?
To: alexana@wellsfargo.com, jlpnymex@aol.com, kingair500@aol.com,
mdesanto@minddata.com, kwgre@aol.com, pmarb@yahoo.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFE636E941.EA5783D9-ON8625697C.007FA1EB@emmis.com>
From: NAlexander@texasmonthly.emmis.com
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:15:34 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on TMNT02/AUS/TXMO(Release 5.0.4a |July 24,
2000) at 10/18/2000 05:54:02 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

TEXAS MONTHLY:  If you want to be big in Texas.

Nancy Alexander
Account Executive
214.871.7704
----- Forwarded by Nancy Alexander/AUS/TXMO on 10/18/00 06:14 PM -----

                    Karen Burke

                                         To:     sloansimmo@yahoo.com,
ccgarcia@prodigy.net, cbsbcol@aol.com,
                    10/18/00             sschrump@ziplink.net, "Hosty, Maria"
<Maria_Hosty@AIMFUNDS.COM>,
                    02:10 PM             Yvonne Anguiano
<yvonne.anguiano@travelocity.com>,
                                         tanya.davis@us.pwcglobal.com,
2onza@pdq.net, "Lisa Elledge"
                                         <lelledge@agr.state.tx.us>,
proyecto4@yahoo.com, "Hughes, Jennifer"
                                         <jhughes@ezgo.textron.com>, Anita
Zmolek/AUS/TXMO@TXMO, Nancy
                                         Alexander/AUS/TXMO@TXMO

                                         cc:

                                         Subject:     Fw: Will You Be The
Difference?

TEXAS MONTHLY:  If you want to be BIG in Texas.

Karen Burke
713.871.1643 phone
713.871.0335 fax

----- Forwarded by Karen Burke/AUS/TXMO on 10/18/2000 02:08 PM -----

                    Jacquelyne

                    O'Keefe              To:     bassw@swbell.net, Karen
Burke/AUS/TXMO@TXMO, Elizabeth
                    Wallace              Fulghum/AUS/TXMO@TXMO, Lanette
Varnadoe/AUS/TXMO@TXMO,
                                         simmonds@pdq.net

                    10/18/2000           cc:

                    11:15 AM             Subject:     Fw: Will You Be The
Difference?

TEXAS MONTHLY:  If you want to be big in Texas.

Jackie O'Keefe Wallace
Retail Advertising Director
phone 713.871.1762
fax  713.871.0335

----- Forwarded by Jacquelyne O'Keefe Wallace/AUS/TXMO on 10/18/00 11:14 AM
-----

                    "Karen

                    Thompson"            To:     "Tim Marron"
<tmarron@bcwilliams.com>, "Suzanne Waller"
                    <kkathome@pdq        <Lostwell@aol.com>, "Shelley Smelley
Marron" <sbmdal@yahoo.com>,
                    .net>                "Pammy Poindexter"
<PAMMYPOIN@aol.com>, "Molly Vaughan"
                                         <mollygv@yahoo.com>, "Melissa
Garlington"
                    10/17/00
<melissag@ronaldmcdonald-houston.org>, "Mary Marron"
                    09:07 PM             <MarronM@WPMAIL.PHSCARE.ORG>,
"Margie \"Aunt Boggie\" Marron"
                                         <mmarron_ar@yahoo.com>, "Liz Rotan"
<ERotan@aol.com>, "julia"
                                         <JDewalch@pdq.net>, "Joanie Seay"
<jseay@ghpcpa.com>, "jenny clark
                                         brown" <Jenny.C.Brown@chase.com>,
"Jackie Wallace"
                                         <JOWallace@texasmonthly.emmis.com>,
"Gmommy Clark"
                                         <gmommyclark@yahoo.com>, "George &
Kathy Thompson"
                                         <GEORGE5@prodigy.net>, "Diane Z"
<dlzdunk@aol.com>, "Dad"
                                         <cclarkjr@okpaper.com>, "Carolyn
Clark Minett"
                                         <CAROLYN.C.MINETT@Saic.com>, "John
Thompson" <john@srpinc.com>,
                                         "Allie" <allynharvey@yahoo.com>

                                         cc:

                                         Subject:     Fw: Will You Be The
Difference?

-----Original Message-----
From: Christine B. Williams <cwilliams@texasnf.org>
To: djtaaffe@worldnet.att.net <djtaaffe@worldnet.att.net>; kkemp165@aol.com
<kkemp165@aol.com>; jflesher@kprc.com <jflesher@kprc.com>;
akdwyer@yahoo.com
<akdwyer@yahoo.com>; cara_clement@yahoo.com <cara_clement@yahoo.com>;
merrie@mail.ev1.net <merrie@mail.ev1.net>; krichardson@texasnf.org
<krichardson@texasnf.org>; kprice@texasnf.org <kprice@texasnf.org>;
ddeleon@texasnf.org <ddeleon@texasnf.org>; rfreeman@texasnf.org
<rfreeman@texasnf.org>; dbadura@texasnf.org <dbadura@texasnf.org>; Karen
Thompson <kkathome@pdq.net>; cmlucas@swbell.net <cmlucas@swbell.net>;
annie319@aol.com <annie319@aol.com>; bmratch@yahoo.com <bmratch@yahoo.com>;
sarah@thedykes.com <sarah@thedykes.com>; laura@thebairds.com
<laura@thebairds.com>; mtucker@datamate.com <mtucker@datamate.com>;
colecaroline@hotmail.com <colecaroline@hotmail.com>;
mark.m.meador@us.arthurandersen.com <mark.m.meador@us.arthurandersen.com>;
Robert Muse <rmuse@simmonsco-intl.com>; dmoriniere@swbank.tx.com
<dmoriniere@swbank.tx.com>; Joanna Latham <jplatham@actx.edu>; Merritt
Pappas <merritt995@aol.com>; Chip Rives <chiprives@aol.com>; Reagan Rives
<reaganluc@aol.com>; Angela & Natalie Nicholson
<angela.nicholson@chron.com>; Hilary and Corey Pond
<hilary.pond@sabre.com>;
Jeffrey Smith <jfsmitty@aol.com>; Kent Winfield <kwinfield@service911.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:37 PM
Subject: FW: Will You Be The Difference?

>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jennifer.p.toomey@us.arthurandersen.com
>[mailto:jennifer.p.toomey@us.arthurandersen.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:53 PM
>To: aford@bpl.com; BirdsBecca@aol.com; bwilliams1236@austin.rr.com;
>ckmattingly@hotmail.com; cshirley@ccj-law.com; cwilliams@texasnf.org;
>EWells@nrsc.org; jill.goldstein@mba02.bus.utexas.edu; halejulie@yahoo.com;
>hollyk8@aol.com; lsm34@columbia.edu; mtucker@dpj.com; sew7@flash.net;
>Elizabeth.Reid@turner.com; RSKAppraiser@email.msn.com; TEHunt@aol.com;
>wdtiidd@aol.com
>Subject: FW: Will You Be The Difference?
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer P. Toomey on 10/17/2000 03:55
>PM
>---------------------------
>
>
>To: Brian_Seiler@aimfunds.com, Fritz_Weiss@aimfunds.com,
>      Jean_Miller@aimfunds.com, Charles_Hebert@aimfunds.com,
>      Sue_Hendrickson@aimfunds.com, Ralph_Terry@aimfunds.com,
>gormanab@mindspring.com, alysonfisher@yahoo.com, amandam@microsoft.com,
>adjohnso@students.uiuc.edu, knocks@ecsis.net, cbidding@post.cis.smu.edu,
>Mpblalock@aol.com, gmb1@compassbnk.com, bcahal@acxiom.com, carle@wt.net,
>cmiller@rice.edu, connelly.mcgreevy@gs.com, gnconnelly@aol.com,
>dawn.beach@bowne.com, Aimeedodson@aol.com, DDOMINIC@temmc.com,
>      heather.k.doyle@ac.com, aeasterby@lrmm.com, ferikson@mdanderson.org,
>      rtfass@fcflaw.com, fguinn@flash.net, Tina.Hoffman@petrocosm.com,
>rhurt@lctn.com, wingram@ddsep.com, jrcoastal@aol.com, Jennyv@dpwpr.com,
>      jbandctaylor@mindspring.com, keasterby@aglife.com, jkiani@coair.com,
>      kianim@epenergy.com, Kristen.Kors@weil.com, BrittonK@perryhomes.net,
>      katek@thepromotionnetwork.com, CLipscomb@kma.com,
>      kaymassmanlobb@yahoo.com, mm52@lucent.com, cjmandola@aol.com,
>mikebid@earthlink.net, nataliebiddinger@yahoo.com, steven.w.murray@ac.com,
>      jpecher@ect.enron.com, receskim@perryhomes.net, Jennifer P. Toomey,
>      cvanos@texas.net, jennyv@dpwpr.com, kwehner@brobeck.com,
>      elizabeth@keen.com, David.D.Wolf@chase.com
>cc:
> Date: 10/16/2000 09:00 AM
> From: Jackie_McGreevy@aimfunds.com
> Subject: FW: Will You Be The Difference?
>
>
>
>
>
>> The Year is 1960.
>>
>> JFK wins the election because he receives
>>
>> 1 MORE VOTE per precinct in Illinois (8,858 votes)
>> 3 MORE VOTES per precinct in Missouri (9,880 votes)
>> 3 MORE VOTES per precinct in New Jersey (22,091 votes)
>>
>> Without those 40,829 votes, the election goes to Nixon.
>>
>> YOUR VOTE DOES MATTER.
>>
>> Experts say this will be the CLOSEST election since 1960.
>> We agree.
>>
>> What can YOU do about it? Join the Bush E-Train!
>> (1) Forward this e-mail to your friends and colleagues
>> (2) Then click on the link below and enter your e-mail:
>> http://www.georgewbush.com/bn.asp?PageMode=FrontPageSignUp
>>
>> OUR GOAL:
>> 2,000,000 e-mail addresses to SPREAD THE WORD
>> and GET OUT THE VOTE.
>>
>> Be a part of history, get on the Bush E-Train and join
>> what will become one of the LARGEST GRASSROOTS
>> MOVEMENTS EVER.
>>
>> MAKE THE DIFFERENCE! and receive the e-mail on
>> Nov. 8 that says, "PRESIDENT-ELECT GEORGE W. BUSH
>> THANKS YOU."
>>
>>
>> _____________________
>>
>> Paid for by Bush-Cheney 2000, Inc.
>> http://www.georgewbush.com
>>
>>
>
===========================================================================
=
>==
>>
>> To unsubscribe, please go here:
>> http://www.georgewbush.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=YOLAA@EARTHLINK.NET
>>
>> To change your e-mail address or any other subscription information,
>please go here:
>> http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*******************Internet Email Confidentiality
Footer*******************
>
>Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
>you
>are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery
>of
>the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
>anyone.
>In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
>by
>reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
>consent to
>Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
>information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
>my
>firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 10:15
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com> on 01/10/2001 10:14:06 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com, gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Master Sales

Jerry Fox reports that Peoples has heard informally that the ICC Staff may
oppose the Master Sales proposal on the grounds that : (1) the approval of
transactions with an affiliate (without complete definition of all terms)
raises a potential for abuse; (2) staff perceives that it will be unable to
ensure that abuse does not occur; and (3) because the transactions under
the agreement are in a competitive market, the addition of enovate as one
more participant in the market with have little incremental effect on
Peoples' operation, i.e., enovate is just one more participant among the
many existing players. (Note that Peoples data responses seem to suggest
the view reflected in item 3.)  There is a status hearing at 11:00am today
which should cover only scheduling. It is unliokely that any substantive
position will be taken today. The schedule is likely to call for some
additional discovery followed by a filing date for staff's evidence abd
recommendation. Peoples will have an opportunity to file "rebuttal" to
staff's position.  I will let you know later what happens at the hearing.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========


Please note the following changes:
Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSEG)
Assigned its contracts to
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC (PSEGENERES)


I saw your boss on Friday-we went to hh and he was there.  Looks like he is
from Michigan!!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Reese/MST/CMS on 10/29/2001
09:24 AM ---------------------------

"Ward, Kim S (Houston)" <Kim.Ward@enron.com> on 10/29/2001 08:31:46 AM

To:   "Angie Conner (E-mail)" <pugezmum@aol.com>, "Brad Fagan (E-mail)"
      <bfagan@paradigmbank.com>, "Cathy Pocock (E-mail)"
      <cathy_pocock@apsc.com>, "Chris Todd (E-mail)"
      <ctodd@tigersportsproperties.com>, "Cindy Tarsi (E-mail)"
      <cindytarsi@aol.com>, "Elizabeth Jordan (E-mail)"
      <Elizabeth_Jordan@aimfunds.com>, "Eric Strickland (E-mail)"
      <estrickland@mieco.com>, "Gayleen Barrett (E-mail)"
      <gayleen.barrett@xemkt.com>, "Ginger& Michael Brown (E-mail)"
      <Gbrown@prosrm.com>, "Harriet Turk (E-mail)" <turktalk@aol.com>,
      "Slone, Jeanie" <Jeanie.Slone@enron.com>, "Jerry Ward (E-mail)"
      <msueward@worldnet.att.net>, "John Schilke (E-mail)"
      <jschilke@ix.netcom.com>, "Lisa Barnwell (E-mail)"
      <lisabarnwell1@yahoo.com>, "Linda Ward Elam (E-mail)"
      <linda@elam.cc>, "Lisa Rosenberg (E-mail)" <lisar@atoga.com>, "Lyndon
      Clark (E-mail)" <orcasouth@yahoo.com>, "Mary Beer (Ellen) (E-mail)"
      <mjb94123@yahoo.com>, "Melissa Reese (E-mail)" <mreese@cmshq.com>,
      "Natalie Boehmer (E-mail)" <natalie.boehmer@eds.com>, "Tina lovett
      (E-mail)" <tlovett@midsouth.rr.com>, "Tricia Tlapek (E-mail)"
      <tti@rcnchicago.com>, "Wes Kersey (E-mail)" <wk@transcarriers.com>,
      "Yonnie Waller (E-mail)" <yonnie.waller@kraft.com>, "Cross, Edith"
      <Edith.Cross@enron.com>, "Vann, Suzanne" <Suzanne.Vann@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  FW: Fw: An Irish Wish...

>
> In a message dated 10/20/01 9:35:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, Hbskuro
> writes:
> > > An Irish Wish, , , , , , , ,
> > > >
> > > > You had better send this back! ! ! ! Good Luck! ! I hope it
> works. . .
> > > > May there always be work for your hands to do;
> > > > May your purse always hold a coin or two;
> > > > May the sun always shine on your windowpane;
> > > > May a rainbow be certain to follow each rain;
> > > > May the hand of a friend always be near you;
> > > > May God fill your heart with gladness to cheer you.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, this is what you have to do. . . . Send this to ALL of your
>
> >friends!
> > > >
> > > > But - you HAVE to send this within 1 hour from when you open it!
>
> > > >
> > > > Now. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Make A wish! ! ! ! ! !
> > > >
> > > > I hope you made your wish!
> > > > Now then, if you send to:
> > > > * 1 person --- your wish will be granted in 1 year
> > > > * 3 people --- 6 months
> > > > * 5 people --- 3 months
> > > > * 6 people --- 1 month
> > > > * 7 people --- 2 weeks
> > > > * 8 people --- 1 week
> > > > * 9 people --- 5 days
> > > > *10 people --- 3 days
> > > > *12 people --- 2 days
> > > > *15 people --- 1 day
> > > > *20 people --- 3 hours
> > > >
> > > >> >  if you send it 2 of your friends . . . . you will
> >automatically
> > > > have
> > > > 3 years of good luck! ! ! : -)
> > > >
> > > > *** Believe in yourself, know what you want, and make it happen!
>
>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


For travel in NOVEMBER and DECEMBER 2000:

Glasgow - New York:.......................GBP:199.00
Outbound, December  - 1,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17
Inbound,  December  - 3,4,5,6,7,9,10,12,13,16,17,18,30

London -  Boston:.........................GBP:179.00
Outbound, November  - 18,21,22,29,30
          December  - 2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13
Inbound,  November  - 20,24,26,27,28,30
   December  - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,16,17

London -  Boston:.........................GBP:199.00
Outbound, December  - 15,16,17,
Inbound,  December  - 17,18,19,23,27-30

London -  Minneapolis:....................GBP:179.00
Outbound, November  - 16,17,22
Inbound,  November  - 24,26,30

*****************************************************************

These are return fares and are INCLUSIVE of International Airport taxes that
are approx. o56 to North America. These fares are only valid for travel in
November & December 2000 and are for Special Offer Club members only(

PLEASE NOTE that these are fares originating from UK only ) for information
on LUCKY FARES originating in USA ) check out www.icelandair.com and join the
Special Offer Club there.

*****************************************************************
FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS APPLY:

ONLY FOR TRAVEL ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED DAYS
You can only enjoy these special fares if you make your reservations before
22nd November 2000.
These are available for UK SPECIAL OFFER CLUB members ONLY.
These fares are only bookable by E-mail or through our website.
No frequent flyer points.
No changes once ticket has been booked.
No refunds after ticket has been booked.
No child discount.
Minimum stay Saturday night.
Travel has to be made on the above mentioned dates.
Stop Over in Iceland is allowed for a maximum of 3 nights.

Please note that seats are limited on this offer and will be sold on a first
come first serve basis.

*****************************************************************

You can book these special offers by e-mailing us at: london@icelandair.is
with your name, address, preferred travel     date(s), daytime telephone
number and the best time to reach you. Before you know we'll call you with
your reservation confirmation..  You can also find us at:
'http://www.icelandair.co.uk' for
further information about the airline, our services and destinations!

That's all there is to it.  So don't wait((.get LUCKY!

If you don%t want to receive our Lucky Fares please send us a note with
subject unsubscribe to london@icelandair.is with your FULL NAME & THE
SUBMITTED E-MAIL ADDRESS and we will remove you from our mailing list.


Interesting article on the Enron situation.

01/16/2002 04:28 PM

---------------------- Forwarded by Don C Baughman/HOU-TX/US/Marsh/MMC
on 16 Jan 2002, 16:28  Wednesday ---------------------------

Fool@motleyfool.com on 30 Nov 2001, 18:30 Friday

To:	Don C Baughman
cc:
Subject:	FoolWatch: Enron as Icarus

 FOOLWATCH - THE MOTLEY FOOL ===============
                       Friday, November 30, 2001
don.c.baughman@marshmc.com
=================================================================
Editor's Picks:
---------------------
- Enron as Icarus
- The Economy and a Top 5 List
- Mutual Fund Managers We Love
- A Christmas You Can Afford
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                    Close    Change  %Change

        FOOL 50   1,427.30   +2.55   +0.18%
        DJIA      9,851.56  +22.14   +0.23%
        S&P 500   1,137.88   -2.32   -0.20%
        NASDAQ    1,930.58   -2.68   -0.14%

              (Numbers as of 4:00 p.m. ET)
               THE LATEST MARKET NUMBERS
           http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547182

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: TD Waterhouse
Open a TD Waterhouse brokerage account and
gain access to integrated, proprietary research
from Goldman Sachs, a leading global investment
banking and securities firm.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=547183

-----------------------------------------------------------------

FOOL ON THE HILL: ENRON AS ICARUS
  Enron fooled most everyone. Bill Mann explains how its own
  hubris did the company in.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547184

THE MOTLEY FOOL TAKE: THE ECONOMY AND A TOP 5 LIST
  The economy's still shrinking, a naming rights curse, and the
  top five things not to say at a job interview.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547185

TMF SELECT: MUTUAL FUND MANAGERS WE LOVE
  Keeping up with good mutual fund managers is a great way to get
  some stock ideas. Check out this month's TMF Select.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=547186

SPECIAL: A CHRISTMAS YOU CAN AFFORD
  This year, make your family get-together meaningful and
  affordable. Here's how to Live Below Your Means this holiday.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547187

SPECIAL: GARDNERS ON TALK OF THE NATION
  If you missed Tom and David Gardner live, never fear.
  You can hear them online anytime.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547188

TAXES: FAMILY LOANS THAT WORK
  It's just a matter of time before someone near and dear to you
  hits you up for a loan. Make it a "win-win" situation.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547189

FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF TODAY'S STORIES, CLICK THE LINK BELOW.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547190

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: TD Waterhouse
Open a TD Waterhouse brokerage account and
gain access to integrated, proprietary research
from Goldman Sachs, a leading global investment
banking and securities firm.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=547191

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547192
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547193

WANNA TAKE THE SHORTCUT?
Check out our new Crash Courses, the fastest way to get
your finances in order. Get results in less than an hour, for
just $10. Try one today!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547194

PERKS FOR FOOLS ONLY
Get free stuff and special offers, just for you!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547195

CUSTOMER SERVICE
Ask our staff for help with email delivery problems.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547196

UNSUBSCRIBE
Here's how to unsubscribe or change your settings.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=don.c.bau
ghman@
marshmc.com

_________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.
Legal Information: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=547197

To:	Don C Baughman/HOU-TX/US/Marsh/MMC@MMC
cc:
From:	Fool@motleyfool.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Luce, Laura
Subject:	FW: Enron Monthly Fundamentals Report

Judy forwarded an "Enron Market Outlook" to PGL MGMT from Freddy-boy.  Is she trying to make us look bad?  Why is Fred going after this business?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	t.hermann@pecorp.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-t+2Ehermann+40pecorp+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	s.richman@pecorp.com; r.rodriguez@pecorp.com; k.classen@pecorp.com; t.compton@pecorp.com; d.fuentes@pecorp.com; Penman, Gregg; Tomaski, Richard
Subject:	FW: Enron Monthly Fundamentals Report

> ----------
> From: 	Pokorny, Judy
> Sent: 	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:10 AM
> To: 	'Tom Nardi'; 'Steve Nance'; O'Connell, Kevin; Morrow, William;
> Patrick, Thomas M.; Pappalardo, Joyce M.; Hermann, Timothy; DeLara,
> Raulando; Wear, Dave; 'Steve Sweem'; 'Wayne Bollinger'; Chiti, James D.;
> Andrejasich, Frank
> Cc: 	Marozas, Brian; Lapson, Robert; Zagorski, Donna M.
> Subject: 	FW: Enron Monthly Fundamentals Report
>
> FYI, enclosed is a presentation from Enron on natural gas and oil
> fundamentals.
>
> ----------
> From:
> Enron.Monthly.Fundamental.Report@enron.com[SMTP:Enron.Monthly.Fundamental.
> Report@enron.com]
> Sent: 	Monday, June 04, 2001 2:14 PM
> To: 	Monthly.Fundamental.Report@enron.com
> Subject: 	Enron Monthly Fundamentals Report
>
>  <<601enronrpt.pdf>>
> (See attached file: 601enronrpt.pdf)
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - 601enronrpt.pdf


I think there is merit in pursuing this.  A couple of comments:
It may be unduly complicated to get customers to provide the funding.
Perhaps we should focus on the banks instead.  The deal might be further
funding in exchange for legislative and regulatory concessions on rates,
transmission and generation siting and the rest of the items you outline.
Rubin would be great to have, but having watched Summers in action I'm not
sure we need another ex-treas.  Summers is superb, up-to-speed, and
apparently willing to work on this.  Linda -- how would Larry feel if we
brought in his ex-boss (I know they're buddies but does Summers really need
the help?).
Need to keep an eye on the ball for large customers-- many of whom are ours.
they will continue to need some access to better rates.  Perhaps the proposal
could be converted to cash in exchange for demand reductions.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/20/2001 10:54 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Summary of Proposed Short-term Solution for California's Energy
Crisis

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/20/2001 10:52 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/20/2001 10:51 PM

		 To: tyson@haas.berkeley.edu, pverleger@compuserve.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Summary of Proposed Short-term Solution for California's Energy
Crisis

Dean Tyson:

It was a pleasure to see you again today. Phil, it was a pleasure to meet you
and I look forward to working together.  Since time is of the essence, I
wanted to summarize where we left off at today,s meeting regarding California,
s energy crisis.  That summary is attached.  I've also attached three
articles from the business section of today's Chronicle that arguably bolster
our arguments for adopting the approach that we discussed at today's meeting.

 Given the fact that the legislative process is moving rapidly, bankruptcy is
a daily threat, and Dean Tyson will be attending the meetings in Davos, it
appears that our window of opportunity is very small.  It seems that success
requires a meeting of the principals by the end of the week, if not sooner.
The chances of success are obviously limited, but I think that we agreed that
all concerned have nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking a shot.
Your offer to help in the effort obviously increases the likelihood of
success and is greatly appreciated.

My apologies in advance if I have mischaracterized any of the points made at
the meeting.  It represents a &first cut,8 it will undoubtedly change as the
details get worked out, and I,m sure I,ve missed something.  So please don,t
hesitate to edit the draft.

Please keep in mind that I have not had a chance to discuss this proposal
internally.  As such, I can,t yet commit Enron to the specifics of the
proposal.  But I,m confident that the company can support something akin to
this structure and can let you and Phil know first thing Monday.

In addition, given the political environment in California, Enron has played
a constructive role by providing low-key, behind the scenes advice and
analysis to policy makers.  That approach seems preferable in this effort as
well.

Finally, Dean Tyson, I mentioned that Linda Robertson heads-up our Washington
D.C. office.  If she can help in any way, please don,t hesitate to let me
know.  Both of you should feel free to call me at home over the weekend to
discuss things further.  My home phone is 415.621.8317.

Best,
Jeff


Greg,

As a follow up. We are talking to Jay Webb today about the data we can get
from
the Enron OnLine system to develop an early warning system  for automated
crude trading.

By the way, it was a good catch. You left us red faced.

Vince


This is the Postfix program at host exseamx02.concureworkplace.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

For further assistance, please contact <postmaster@concureworkplace.com>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.

			The Postfix program

<enron_update@concureworkplace.com>: unknown user: "enron_update"

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCAUSHOL>
To: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:31:20 GMT
Subject:

Please direct your concerns to my admin. assistant Nyree Chanaba
at ext. 5-4035

-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:34 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Monika Causholli
Report Name:   Monika Causholli
Report Date:   10/25/01
Report ID:     1CD662BAC8BB11D5B373
Submitted On:  10/25/01

Receipts for this expense report have not yet been received. If receipts
have been mailed, please disregard this message.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI based on our convo yesterday.  Please let me know if there is any info that has come up since we last spoke to lead you to believe this may not be possible.

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Abel, Chris; Andrews, Naveen; Apollo, Beth; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Bradford, William S.; Brooks, Loretta; Buy, Rick; Castleman, Kent; Causey, Richard; Cockrell, Rainier; Colwell, Wes; Curry, Wanda; Day, Misti; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Gold, Joe; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hardy, Trey; Hayden, Frank; Helton, Susan; Hickerson, Gary; Hillis, Kimberly; Hodges, Georgeanne; Kaminski, Vince J; Kass, Michael; Kathol, Sherri; Killen, Faith; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; McKinney, Hal; McMahon, Jeffrey; Mills, Scott; Moscoso, Michael E.; Murphy, Ted; New, James; Piper, Greg; Port, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Schmidt, Darin; Schoppe, Tammie; Shepperd, Tammy R.; Talley, Darin; Ueckert, Allen W.; Valdez, Veronica; Whalley, Greg; White, Stacey W.; Whiting, Greg
Subject:	status update on the DPR

We have postponed issuing the DPR until the terminations that have already been entered into are appropriately reflected in the risk books.  My aim is to produce a full preliminary DPR next Monday for this Friday's trading activity.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond@ENRON
10/25/2000 02:58 PM
Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McCullough/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: E-strategy for metals trading

Attached is an article from yesterday's FT regarding the efforts by a
consortia of four major international metals and mining producers to develop
an internet marketplace for producers and consumers.  As we come across this
type of information to keep you abreast of developments in the commodity
markets, we will pass it along.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda


FYI.  My understanding is that the decisions would actually go out prior to
Aug. , with "effective date" in Aug., , thus providing time for the appeals
process.  Do others have a similar or different view?  Do we intend to stay
in touch, in view of the fact that there's been some "breathing room"
provided by the PUC delaying its DA vote, and given the heavy lifting that is
still needed to get the core/noncore agreement teed-up and through?

Happy 4th to all.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001 12:41 PM -----

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
[mailto:philip_angelides@treasurer.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:38 AM
To: FITZPATRICK, Charles
Subject: Investor Memo - Timetable Update

Please note the update regarding the State of California DWR Power Bonds
provided in the attached memo.

 <<Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf>>

If you have any questions, please contact Charles Fitzpatrick at (800)
900-3873.

 - Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf


I am counting on  you NOT to share this with anyone.  Diomedes has seen it
but David has not, and you never know if you are on the right track with
David.  Again, I do not advocate the Diomedes version if that is our strategy.

Steven J Kean@EES
03/21/2000 04:48 PM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker@EES
To: Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: ALSO URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL

Kelly:

Please email me the draft of the office of Chairman.  I'd like to have
something concrete in mind (I don't intend to share a copy) when I talk to
Jeff - - by the way, he's out this week on spring break with his kids.

    Steve


Boy, I gotta tell you, the demands for those tickets are NOT pouring in. Hope the thing in D.C. went OK last week.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Nord, Sue
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: CMTA Hosting President Bush 10-17-01 RSVP ASAP

Thanks for the offer.  I don't think they let the likes of me into those events!

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul;
Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Guerrero, Janel; Landwehr,
Susan M.
Subject: FW: CMTA Hosting President Bush 10-17-01 RSVP ASAP

FYI.  I don't know if this means that Sue and I both get a ticket, or if there's only one.  If someone from Houston--or another office--is interested, we'd be happy to accommodate.  Otherwise, I'm sure that we'll take full advantage of the opporunity.  Just let us know.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack M. Stewart, President - CMTA [mailto:groyer@cmta.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: CMTA Hosting President Bush 10-17-01 RSVP ASAP

Dear CMTA Members:

From: Jack Stewart, President - California Manufacturers & Technology
Association

The California Manufacturers & Technology Association is hosting a major
foreign policy and international trade speech by President George Bush!
President Bush is making the stop as he travels to China on a two-day state
visit and the White House asked us just yesterday to host the event.

?	Sacramento Memorial Auditorium
?	11:00 am to noon
?	October 17th, 2001

?	Yes, that's next Wednesday!

As a valued CMTA member, a complimentary ticket has been reserved for you or
another employee of your company.

BUT YOU MUST RSVP WITH YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER to Geri Royer at
916-498-3330 or groyer@cmta.net by 4:00pm (PDT), October 12th, 2001.

Please take advantage of this opportunity that your CMTA membership affords
you.

If you would like to come in the night of October 16, we have held a block
of rooms at the Sacramento Hyatt Regency Hotel (916/443-1234) at a rate of
$140 night.  Just ask to reserve your room under the CMTA block.
Reservations must also be made by October 12 to guarantee this rate.

This is a great opportunity to support the President and send him off on his
first foreign trip since the terrorist attacks on September 11.

As you know, security will be tight so there cannot be any exceptions on the
October 12, 4:00pm (PDT) RSVP DEADLINE.

We hope to hear back from you quickly and look forward to seeing you in
Sacramento next Wednesday.


Sorry,  Jean Mrha's assistant should have it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Edison, Andrew
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:

Do you have Randy Curry's phone number?


This offer is being sent to you as a member of CustomOffers. If you feel you have received this message in error or do not wish to receive future messages, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this email.    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  This Certificate Entitles    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Patrice Mims [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  to a 30 second credit decision (subject to verification)!   [IMAGE]  That's great news, Patrice! Now you can have what everybody has been waiting for... an online credit decision (subject to verification) within 30 seconds!   Get the credit you deserve now with GetSmartSM Visa
!    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    You must be a U.S resident and at least 18 years of age to apply. This offer may not be available to current Providian  credit card customers and employees of Providian. GetSmart is currently available in all U.S. states except Wisconsin.   If you previously asked to be excluded from GetSmart or Providian product offerings and solicitations, they apologize for this e-mail. Every effort was made to ensure that you were excluded from this e-mail. However, if GetSmart does not have your current e-mail address in their database, they were unable to prevent this e-mail from reaching you. If you do not wish to receive promotional e-mail from GetSmart, click here  and let us know.   Providian National Bank - Member FDIC, Providian Bank - Member FDIC     If the above links do not work or appear, simply copy this URL and paste it into your browser's address field:  http://www.getsmart.com/BannerGSVisa?banner_id=Traffix/email/p99_1101.gif     Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive this mailing, by registering at  CustomOffers.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience, with offers that include bargains, entertainment, and  money-making ideas. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, click here  or link to http://web1.customoffers.com/unsubscribe.asp?emid=798&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator. [IMAGE]


Mike, sorry, I probably deleted not realizing it (I was adjusting to Outlook)  Would you mind
resending it.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 6:23 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

Yes, I sent you a follow-up note last Friday....Let me know if you did not recieve it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Bodnar, Michael
Subject:	FW: IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

Mike, is this taken care of ?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lynn Blair
Sent:	Sunday, June 24, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Michael Bodnar; John Buchanan
Cc:	Lynn Blair
Subject:	RE: IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

Mike, can you follow up with the team, Chris and Sue to be sure we are
all on the same page on this issue?  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/24/2001 10:19 AM ---------------------------
From:	Chris Sebesta/Enron@EnronXGate on 06/22/2001 11:28 AM
To:	Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Frank Semin/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

I assumed Kaztex were nominating on the timely, but after our storage discussions at today's Morning Meeting, I need to check.  I will instruct them to do so.  This should then clear up their accounts.

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neville, Sue
Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Sebesta, Chris; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Semin, Frank
Subject:	RE: IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

Chris,

The tariff prohibits us from makeing transfers between storage points, not any NNG policies.   Are they making the nomination from Mid 17 to Demarc Storage on the timely process?  If they are, they should have been able to get injections, as we have not been allocating the timely process the last few days.

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sebesta, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Neville, Sue
Cc:	Semin, Frank
Subject:	IDD/Park & Ride Transfer

Earlier this month, Marketing entered into a negotiated rate deal with Kaztex for one day transport from Demarc to Eagle.  It was Kaztex's intention to withdraw the gas they had in their IDD/Park & Ride account to bring their balance down to zero.  The negotiated rate deal required extensive review and the customer was tendered the contract at 11:52 AM.  Market Services held open the window to accomodate their late nomination.

Herein lies the problem, the Kaztex scheduler withdrew the Park & Ride from the Demarc Storage Point because Demarc was their Primary Receipt Point on the transportat contract.   Instead, they should have withdrew from their Ogden and Mid 17 Storage balances.  To date, they have tried to nominate a transport from the Mid 17 and Ogden points to Demarc Storage but the Storage Nominations continue to be allocated.

I understand it is not Northern's policy to transfer storage between two points without a transportation transaction, however, I would request for this specific case Northern would administer a transfer thus preventing any possible MIC charges at the end of the month.  I estimate the transport revenue being waived to be approx. $44 (2345 MMBtu from Mid 17 Storage * $0.019 plus 720 MMBtu from Ogden at $0 cost).  The negotiated rate deal easily made up this amount.

If you agree with allowing the transfer of the storage balances, please let me know and I will alert the appropriate scheduler and Kaztex.

Thank you for your consideration.

Chris Sebesta
Northern Natural Gas
Office:  402-398-7064
Fax:      402-398-7413
chris.sebesta@enron.com


Attached is the Enron Global Markets EOL Crude 24/7Trading violation memo
for  Net Open Position for June 18, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for
Enron Global Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this
memo, signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will
forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


Attached is a power point I used for next Tuesday's PLI presentation.
In addition to my own input, I borrowed from Ken's outline and Mark's
powerpoint from last year - and so I thought I'd give us all credit on
page 1.  Please feel free to make any changes or additions as you feel
appropriate.  I will be out of the office on Friday and Monday, and so
if you wish to discuss the presentation with me beforehand, it will be
best if we speak by Thursday.  Bill.

 - PLI 2001 Energy.ppt


Daren:

You put this in, do have a clue?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 04:30
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/13/2000 04:17 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Amoco Energy 2/00

We have a purchase deal in the system, 205116, for Feb. 2000 production that
Amoco does not show.  Can you tell me the trader's name at Amoco that the
deal was done with?

Megan


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Rance/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000 01:26
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sara Weaver @ EES                           11/27/2000 11:04 AM

To: Analysts 2000, Michelle Gross/HOU/EES@EES, Brooklyn Couch/HOU/EES@EES,
Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES, Anate Kor/HOU/EES@EES, Sonia
Garcia/HOU/EES@EES, Dulle, Kate, Judy Dyer/HOU/EES@EES, Ana
Agudelo/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: FW: *URGENT*...gang initiation info; please read!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Weaver/HOU/EES on 11/27/2000 10:57
AM ---------------------------

Cathy Pham
11/27/2000 10:55 AM
To: lt930@yahoo.com, NganHaBui@yahoo.com, Sara Weaver/HOU/EES@EES, Sonia
Perez/HOU/EES@EES, Quyen Nguyen/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: *URGENT*...gang initiation info; please read!!!

> IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR SAFETY FROM THE DIRECTOR OF
> TRAINING AT THE US ARMYMILITARY POLICE SCHOOL
> PLEASE TAKE TIME TO READ AND PASS ALONG !
>
> A friend stopped at a pay-at-the-pump gas station to get gas.
> Once she filled her gas tank after paying at the pump and started
> to leave the attendant inside came over the speaker. He told her that
> something happened with her card and that she needed to come inside to
> pay.
>
> The lady was confused because the transaction showed complete and
> approved.
> She told him that and was getting ready to leave but the attendant once
> again
> urged her to come in to pay or else. She proceeded to go inside and
> started arguing with the
> attendant about his threat.
>
> He told her to calm down and listen carefully:
> He told her that while she was pumping gas, a guy
> slipped into the back seat of her car on the other side and he had called
> the
> police. She immediately became scared and looked out there in time to see
> her car door open and the guy slip out.
>
> The report is that the new gang initiation thing is to bring back a
> woman's body part.
> One way they are doing this is crawling under girls/women's cars  while
> they're
> pumping gas or at grocery stores in the night time. Then they are cutting
> the lady's
> ankles to disable them in  order to kidnap them, kill and dismember them.
> The other way is slipping into unattended cars and kidnapping the women to
> kill and
> dismember them.
>
> Please pass this on to other women, young and old alike. BE extra careful
> going to and from your car at night. If at all possible, don't go alone!
> This is real!!
>
> The message:
> 1. ALWAYS lock your car doors, even if you're gone
> for just second.
> 2. Check underneath your car when approaching it
> for reentry, and check in the back before getting in.
> 3. Always be aware of your surroundings and other
> individuals in your  general vicinity, particularly at night!
>
> Send this to your friends so as many females as possible can be made
> aware of this new threat, and so your friend will not be the next victim.
>
> Thanks,
> Barbara Baker, Secretary
> Directorate of Training
> US Army Military Police School
> (573) 563-8043


I just wanted to tell the three of you that I had such a ball at Texadelphia
today... Susan, I am so happy for you and your Ted Noble stories were
wonderful! :o)

Jessica, I am VERY glad that it worked out that you could be in Houston this
weekend... everything was so relaxing and I enjoyed the time spent.... glad
we were also able to share the terrible Houston fashion scene... so sad...

I love you all very much and hope you have a wonderful week!

-Jen

PS  Susan here's the quote:

"I think we delight to praise what we enjoy because the praise not merely
expresses but completes the enjoyment; it is its appointed consummation.  It
is not out of compliment that lovers keep on telling one another how
beautiful they are; the delight is incomplete till it is expressed."  --
C.S. Lewis
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Please call me with any comments or changes.


I will begin circulating a list of ECT/ S. Cone Counterparty master swap
agreements.  Other than yourself, who else should receive these updates?  In
particular, I am thinking of commercials in BA and/or Sao Paulo.  Would you
encourage more frequent distribution?  Sara


THE ATTACHED IS THE CORRECT VERSION.  Please disregard an earlier version of
this form sent to Chris Shenkman by Dawn Doucet.  That version was not
complete.


Antelope is a project that we acquired last year from AES.  The project has land, some early permits, and a transmission queue position that we used at Pastoria.  Total consideration paid to AES was approximately $15MM, most of which was charged to Pastoria.  The resulting cost basis should be about $1.8MM plus the ERC's not used at Pastoria (approx. $6MM).  Over the next 4 months we will determine whether we want to pursue the project or, if not, write off the $1.8MM and sell/transfer the ERC's for a gain of $1.8MM+.

Coyote Springs was a project that we developed and sold in 2000.  It was a 280MW 7FA that we co-developed with Portland General and sold pre-construction to Avista for a $18MM promote.  There should not be any balance sheet exposure associated with it- we are done.

Louise Kitchen
04/16/2001 02:24 PM
To:	Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	I'm cleaning up the balance sheet still and two new things next to your name

What are Antelope and Coyote Springs?

Thanks

Louise


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033018.txt


are we using this?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Sonya
Sent:	Monday, May 14, 2001 5:08 PM
To:	DL-DJI
Subject:	"Do you use Dow Jones Interactive?"

Enron is in the process of re-negotiating our contract with Dow Jones Interactive and we need to know if you are currently
accessing this data.  In the near future there will be a cost associated with this information and you are currently listed as
having a license.

Please click on the below link and let us know if you need continued access to this service.

http://nahou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/inquisite/DJI/DJI.html

Thank You,
Market Data

Sonya L. Johnson
Enron Networks
Market Data Analyst/IT
(713) 345-4540
sonya.johnson@enron.com


Enjoy!
 - 20011012ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011012ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


1. Legislative Update - What is Enron's message on 6x and 33x?
2. Gov Davis Statement on Direct Access - Sue Mara
3. Cal PX Chargeback Settlement Discussions - Any News?
4. SDG&E Surcharge Update
5. Other


Attached is the EES update for 12/27.

We have received the NEPOOL escrow instructions and amount, but not the sign off yet to fund.  I assume this will have to be Friday, so its in the forecast for tomorrow.  If not, then it will be Monday or later next week.

Thanks

Wade


Cool! I'll send out a confirmation next week.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	RE: PLEASE RESPOND: New Hire dinner RSVP needed*

Sounds great to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Grace
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	RE: PLEASE RESPOND: New Hire dinner RSVP needed*

It's a filet of beef with bourdelaise sauce.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	RE: PLEASE RESPOND: New Hire dinner RSVP needed*

Count me in... Is the beef steak?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Grace
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Sheppard, Kathryn; Bland, Todd; Tchernokojeva, Marina; Freeman, Scott; Lee, Eugene; Van Gelder, John; Chatterton, Jill; Bruce, James; Mumm, Chris; Bishop, Serena; Warner, Nicholas; Cavanaugh, Darren; McCarrel, Steven; Crandall, Sean; Guillaume, David; Gilbert, Scotty; Hall, Steve C.; Anderson, John; Page, Jonalan; Perry, Todd; Williams III, Bill; O'Neil, Murray P.; Richter, Jeff; Tweed, Sheila; Ngo, Tracy; Sager, Elizabeth; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Motley, Matt
Cc:	Davidson, Debra; Gustafson, Mollie
Subject:	PLEASE RESPOND: New Hire dinner RSVP needed*

Will you be attending the New Hire Dinner
6pm on August 1st, at the Heathman?

Please let me know by Thursday!

 << OLE Object: Microsoft Clip Gallery >>

(Remember to indicate your meal preference (beef, chicken, veggie)!)

*To the new analysts/associates: Your invitations were mailed to the most current address listed in our files.


As you are aware, there have recently been a number of virus attacks released and spread across the Internet. Although Enron continually readdresses and updates its virus protection procedures, new viruses will continue to be released and pose a threat to Enron's computing environment. Therefore, it is very important that all Enron employees understand their responsibilities in helping Enron stay virus free.
If you receive a file via Email or any other means and you are unfamiliar with the sender or the purpose of the file, please do not automatically open/launch the file. One of the key elements of a virus attack is the innocent nature of its delivery.
Viruses can cause a significant amount of damage, including data loss and service outage. Viruses such as the Melissa, ILOVEYOU, AnnaKournikova, and the recent Nimda virus, caused organizations billions of dollars. Sometimes new viruses can breach the environment before the virus scanning software has been updated to detect & quarantine them.
Every employee in the Enron organization has a responsibility to keep our computing environment virus-free.
If you believe you have a file that looks suspicious, delete it or contact your Resolution Center to obtain their assistance.
North America Resolution Center - x31411
ETS Solution Center - x54745
European Resolution Center - x36777
EES Help Desk - x 39797
Prevention & Detection = PROTECTION!


Attached is the new profile template to begin using on Monday, Oct. 30.
Please note the additions are colored in (Light Turquois).   Let me know if
you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Following our announcement of an additional of $1 billion credit line, Standard & Poor's (S&P) today downgraded Enron's long-term credit rating one notch from BBB+ to BBB and short-term rating from A2 to A3.  We expected this, because it is not unusual to be downgraded after using assets to secure credit.  This is still above investment grade.

The ratings of our pipelines Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern have also been lowered from A- to BBB.  In S&P's words, "Their ratings [are now] in line with those of the parent company to reflect S&P's view that Enron's pipeline assets have become more strategic to the company."

S&P also said, "[We continue] to believe that Enron's liquidity position is adequate to see the company through the current period of uncertainty, and that the company is working to provide itself with an even greater liquidity cushion through additional bank lines and pending asset sales."

As I've said before, building on our liquidity position through additional credit lines maintains our counterparties' confidence and strengthens our core businesses.

It's important for you to know that our gas and power numbers - which account for more than 95 percent of our trading activity - indicate that our customer base is not withdrawing, closing out positions, or reducing transaction levels as a result of credit concerns.  In fact, EnronOnline trading volumes are currently experiencing above-normal activity.

We will continue to update you as new developments arise.  Thank you.


The report named: NG - Price P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=10&report_name=NG+-+Price+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/01/2001>, published as of 11/01/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Did this get taken care of?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
04/05/2000 10:13 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           04/04/2000 01:38 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Citygate Production

Yes, CES Retail did take this gas for Jan, Feb & March.  The Canonsburg
office was responsible for the noms.
 Yes, the deal needs to be input into Sitata.  Maybe, Terry can input.  Wade
has copies of the monthly invoices from T & F Operating for all three months.

Deal details:
Volume = 10,000 MCF per month
Price for Jan, Feb & Mar = $3.465 / MCF
I would not worry about the Mcf issue here.  Just put the volumes and price
in and pay the bill.
John

Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:08 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Citygate Production

Hey John, did CES take this gas for Jan, Feb, and Mar?  Wade would like to
see this deal in the system.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 01:06
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/04/2000 12:02 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Citygate Production

T&F Operating has sent ENA a "breach of contract" letter and is requesting to
terminate the contract effective 4/1/2000.

Colleen, I will give you a copy of the letter that was faxed to John Singer.

CES did a buy/sale behind Penn Fuel on CGAS for 1 year starting Nov 1, 1999.
T&F is the supplier and Glenn Gary was the market.   The market went away
effective 4/1/2000 and ENA/EES has no other market behind this part of Penn
Fuel's system.  We checked with the Penn Fuel asset management deal and
according to Penn Fuel, they can't take it either.

T&F is looking for their payment for Jan, Feb, and Mar, and T&F will waive
any and all "cover" cost that ENA would otherwise be liable for subsequent to
April 1, 2000.

John Singer wants to make sure we address the hedges in the books - will this
need to be included in the CES true-up?  Also, John wants to know if he
should sign the letter?.  Colleen, I told John you would anwser that question.