Ken and Greg

I am part of the Enron Tax Department, assigned currently to Enron Global Assets, previously to Enron India.  Your comment regarding the very bad investments Enron made in international assets is absolutely true.  Perhaps the assets themselves are not all that bad, Enron just over-paid, over-built or over-leveraged.  In some cases, I suspect we did all three!

But that's not the point of this message.

When you make statements like you did in yesterday's Investor conference call it erodes EGA's ability to sell those assets (who wants to buy a very bad investment ?) and chokes the spirit of the employees who have remained loyal to Enron and continue to support the needs of EGA.  The 100 or so members in the EGA support group did not make the bad decisions.  Those were made by former and current executives, RAC, Enron's Board of Directors, and others who were well-qualified to make such decisions.  I cannot begin to tell you how hard Tax, Legal, Accounting, PR, etc. worked to make the best of what often-times looked to us to be a stupid if not bad investment.

Many of those who remain have devoted several years to Enron's international experiment.  We've given up dinner with our families, weekend soccer games and campouts, in many cases we have even sacrificed our good health.  I suspect we will continue to make those sacrifices in order to close asset sales and efficiently return to Enron the remaining value.

Please, when you proclaim to the World the very bad investments Enron made, take some time to remind those of us who are left to unwind these investments that Enron is fortunate to have some very bright and dedicated employees diligently working to contain the damage already done.

Sincerely,

Mike Norris


FORBES.COM DAILY NEWSLETTER DECEMBER 5, 2001
--------------------------------------------
  *The Overachievers
  *The Insiders
  *SEC: Stick To Bottom Line--Or Else
  *Who Says E-Commerce Is Dead?
  *Segway's Boring. Bring On The Hovercraft
  *Lifestyle: Ten Gifts For Connoisseurs

=================================================================
==========================ADVERTISEMENT==========================
Streaming data and multiple requests demanding immediate
attention - an IBM e(logo)server pSeries solution for e-business
infrastructure can meet the needs of the toughest financial
environment.  Available, reliable - and now at savings up to $33,000.
Get details, and better understand the advantages of e-business
infrastructure with a complimentary report on IT security:
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090031
=================================================================

THE OVERACHIEVERS
Lisa DiCarlo
Five companies that have had a stellar 2001 despite this year's
severe economic slump.
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090032

THE INSIDERS
12.05.01, 12:00 PM ET - Arik Hesseldahl
Synopsys' acquisition of Avanti could put to rest one of Silicon
Valley's most intriguing scandals.
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090033

SEC: STICK TO BOTTOM LINE--OR ELSE
12.05.01, 11:33 AM ET - Mark Lewis
Firms that fudge numbers may face discipline. But the bottom-line
rule is still caveat emptor.
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090034

WHO SAYS E-COMMERCE IS DEAD?
12.05.01, 9:00 AM ET - Jody Yen
Despite the demise of eToys and others, Internet retailing still
has great growth and profit potential.
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090035

SEGWAY'S BORING. BRING ON THE HOVERCRAFT
12.05.01, 10:00 AM ET - Arik Hesseldahl
The new Segway scooter's OK. But why roll around on wheels when
you can hover?
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090036

LIFESTYLE: TEN GIFTS FOR CONNOISSEURS
12.05.01, 12:01 AM ET - Anna Rohleder
From a Bauhaus shaker to an Old Master drawing, everything for
the collector in your life for the holidays.
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090037

------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE & UNSUBSCRIBE

To SUBSCRIBE to any FORBES.COM newsletter, join us as a member
at:
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090038

UNSUBSCRIBING FROM A NEWSLETTER
Forbes.com members who selected newsletters when they signed up
or on their edit profile page can unsubscribe at:
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090039

If you are not a member, or did not select newsletters on our
membership pages, you can UNSUBSCRIBE to this newsletter by
simply replying to this message and changing the message's
subject heading to "Unsubscribe".

To MANAGE all your Forbes.com newsletter accounts or change your
delivery address, join us as a member at:
http://tm0.com/forbes/sbct.cgi?s=167547968&i=424364&d=2090040
------------------------------------------------------------------


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil20.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded20.pdf

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-23-02.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
12:50 PM ---------------------------

"Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com> on 04/12/2001 08:22:39 AM
To: "Suzann Schnitzer" <sschnitz@jcpenney.com>, "susan schnitzer"
<s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>, "Sandra F Brawner"
<Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>, <robert.k.rodriguez@db.com>, "Morris, Lamar
\(SUGARCREEK XGH 317\)" <LMorris1@pclient.ml.com>, "Mike Bilotti"
<michael.bilotti@capco.com>, <mhandler@natsource.com>, "lance jordan"
<lcjo@dynegy.com>, "keith taylor" <kata@dynegy.com>, <JSEGAUL44@aol.com>,
"john shaw" <john.shaw@glencore-us.com>, "jeremy davis" <jjda@dynegy.com>,
"Janet Schnitzer" <jrschnitzer@hotmail.com>, "gerardo ruiz"
<gee_ruiz@hotmail.com>, "diana hollier" <dhollier@energyusa.com>, "david
dunnavandt" <ddunnavant@reliantenergy.com>, "Chris Paul"
<cpaul@dwintegrated.com>, "chaw" <chaw@crcom.net>, "Brian York"
<byork@dwintegrated.com>, "anrew o ertel" <aertel@evomarkets.com>,
<allison_kushnick@mhhs.org>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Colin Powell's apology to China

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Lee" <herbl@amerexenergy.com>
To: "Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:58 AM
Subject: Fw: Colin Powell's apology to China

>
>

 - chinese2.jpg


Earl - I have a meter with flow and no nom.  Meter 1225 (Ingleside Plant
Brandywine) has flow from 2/14 thru 2/25.  Are these valid volumes or high
zeroes?  Please let me know what you find out.

Aimee


Yes, please.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:13 PM
To: Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: FW: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay damages

Let me know if you'd like me to handle the Pain Creek matter.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lund, David
Sent: Mon 9/10/2001 4:31 PM
To: Brownfeld, Gail; Millie.Hewes@nepco.com
Cc: Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay damages

Of course Gail.  I'm sorry you didn't get a copy sooner.

Millie,  Please make a copy of the arbitration demand and our response that
Seth Price submitted on our behalf.  This is entitled "Foster Wheeler
Limited vs. NEPCO"  Please fax or overnight mail the copy to Gail Brownfeld
at Enron, EWS.  Go to the Enron web site (People Finder) to locate her
mailing address.  Thanks.

By copy to Richard Sanders, I left a voice message last week with you
describing a new matter we are developing as a claim against Overland
Construction, Inc. (a subsidiary of Black and Veatch) on a project called
"Payne Creek", located in central Florida.  Considering the losses suffered
to date ($7 Million) the project is now spelled "Pain Creek".  I spoke to
Schwartzenburg about it and he suggested we enlist your group for
assistance.  I have also retained Seth Price's firm (with Derrick's
approval) to help evaluate and develop the claim.  I would like to schedule
a conference call with Seth, myself and a member of your group to review the
claim.  Schwartzenburg and myself are available on Thursday, September 13th
and so is Seth but only in the morning.  Given the time zone differences
between Seth and myself, I would like to target 11:00 AM central time.  Let
me know if Gail or someone else will be the assigned attorney.  The claim
involves construction cost overruns due to errors in the owners
specification.

Thanks.

David H. Lund, Jr.
Assistant General Counsel
National Energy Production Corporation
11831 North Creek Parkway N.
Bothell, WA 98011
425-415-3138
Fax: 425-415-3032
David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Brownfeld, Gail [ <mailto:Gail.Brownfeld@ENRON.com>]
                Sent:   Monday, September 10, 2001 10:34 AM
                To:     Lund, David
                Cc:     Sanders, Richard B.
                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for
delay damages

                David,
                        Sorry for the phone tag of last week. The reason I
was calling
                actually related to the attached.Can I get a copy of the
file on this
                and also can we schedule a call with outside counsel to
discuss this
                matter?  Apparently, life at EWS in not that different from
EI and as
                the trusty litigation manager, I need to be involved in
this.  To the
                extent that I have suggested a call on Wednesday to discuss
the Pakistan
                case, maybe you and I can arrange something with Seth to
occur before or
                after that call.  It would be helpful to have what was filed
beforehand,
                if it could be arranged. Thanks in advance.

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Lund, David
                Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:18 PM
                To: Brownfeld, Gail
                Subject: RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay
damages

                Yes, against NEPCO.  We have retained Seth Price of Shapiro
Fussell in
                Atlanta.  I have Derrick's approval.  The action was
delivered two weeks
                ago
                and then put on hold.  After the unsuccessful settlement
meeting, it was
                ignited again.  Seth will issue our response on Tuesday
(9/4).  Seth has
                worked on NEPCO matters before and is familiar with our
business
                practices
                and contract terms with suppliers.

                This is rather new matter and I didn't have the opportunity
to involve
                you
                earlier.

                David H. Lund, Jr.
                Assistant General Counsel
                National Energy Production Corporation
                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                Bothell, WA 98011
                425-415-3138
                Fax: 425-415-3032
                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From:   Brownfeld, Gail
                [ <mailto:Gail.Brownfeld@ENRON.com>]
                                Sent:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:46 AM
                                To:     Lund, David; Schwartzenburg, John
                                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested
language
                for
                delay damages

                                Dave,
                                        Was the arbitration initiated
against NEPCO?  If
                so,
                who has
                                been retained to handle it?

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From: Lund, David
                                Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:30 PM
                                To: Schwartzenburg, John
                                Cc: Brownfeld, Gail
                                Subject: FW: Foster Wheeler suggested
language for delay
                damages

                                This is a heads up to a mounting dispute
with a major
                equipment
                                supplier,
                                Foster Wheeler Limited (HRSG supplier).
Currently they
                have
                initiated
                                an
                                arbitration action before the AAA here in
Seattle for a
                payment claim
                                ($1.2
                                M) on the Linden, NJ project of which we
have held back
                payment to
                                satisfy
                                our claim for delay LDs and re-work ($3.8
M).  While
                this
                action is
                                pending,
                                FWL has initiated some unlawful bargaining
tactics on
                our
                Lakeworth, FL
                                project.  More of the drama is outlined
below.

                                No need for action here.

                                David H. Lund, Jr.
                                Assistant General Counsel
                                National Energy Production Corporation
                                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                                Bothell, WA 98011
                                425-415-3138
                                Fax: 425-415-3032
                                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From:   B-David Lund
                                Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:03 PM
                                To:     B-Galen Torneby
                                Cc:     B-Bob Black; B-Don Campbell; B-Greg
Tardanico;
                B-Mike Ranz;
                                B-Daniel
                                Haas; B-David Hattery; 'Seth Price'
                                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested
language
                for
                delay damages

                                ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION; PRIVELEGED
AND
                CONFIDENTIAL

                                Galen,

                                I don't have the full history of dealing on
this
                purchase
                order with
                                FWL,
                                but my instincts say we don't have to accept
"material"
                changes to the
                                terms
                                on the eve of signing a PO.  FWL's attempt
to adjust
                significant delay
                                risk
                                at the eleventh hour constitutes a breach of
good faith
                and
                fair
                                dealing.
                                It is as if we were to sign the PO based on
weeks of
                review
                of a firm
                                and
                                final price but mark down the price a few
million on the
                final draft
                                because
                                we felt we were taken to the cleaners on a
previous job
                they
                sold to us.
                                FWL needs to be instructed to accept the PO
without the
                proposed
                                changes.
                                If they refuse, we have (and we must tell
them) the
                choice
                to contract
                                with
                                another party and hold them liable for the
extra cost of
                another
                                supplier to
                                make the schedule required.  This liability
is based on
                breach of an
                                implied
                                contract and FWL faces damages for
detrimental reliance
                (that would be
                                the
                                incremental cost above FWL's firm price
charged by the
                replacement
                                vendor).
                                The reliance argument is that we excused
other bidders
                weeks
                ago and
                                chose
                                to exclusively deal with FWL based on
agreement
                (reliance)
                of terms and
                                conditions presented in earlier drafts of
the PO or
                referred
                to in
                                previous
                                PO documents.  The detriment argument is FWL
knew they
                had
                us captive to
                                them on this deal.  By going forward without
other
                bidders,
                we lost
                                price
                                protection and commitment for schedule by
other bidders,
                therefore we
                                are at
                                a detriment without market forces.  In the
best world,
                our
                purchasing
                                activities need to keep proposals
competitive by not
                dropping back to
                                one
                                supplier for critical path equipment.

                                I mentioned a choice here, the other choice
is to
                continue
                to deal with
                                FWL
                                and accept their additional terms because
the risk of
                changing horses
                                and
                                being successful on a lawsuit based on
implied contract
                and
                detrimental
                                reliance outweighs the risk and cost of
having to
                "mitigate"
                the effect
                                of
                                LDs on FWL if critical path work is not
impacted or hard
                to
                document and
                                prove it was impacted, and whether our
obligations were
                fulfilled in
                                this
                                respect.  Since FWL has now opened the door
to change
                "material" terms
                                on
                                the eve of signing, we have the opportunity
to do the
                same
                with them,
                                but
                                that doesn't help if the parties continue to
go in
                opposite
                directions
                                while
                                your end date stays the same.  I would say
they know
                this is
                a dilemma
                                to us
                                and are betting we will deal with them on
these new
                first-time
                                "material"
                                changes to the PO terms.  If we go with the
second
                choice, I
                would
                                encourage
                                NEPCO and Enron to take FWL off any
preferred bidders
                list.

                                In addition, I thought I heard from the
folks who
                attended
                the Linden 6
                                settlement meeting a week ago that the
parties said they
                would not let
                                the
                                litigation on Linden 6 effect our other
on-going deals.
                Apparently FWL
                                is
                                taking their issues on Linden 6 over to
other deals.  We
                may
                want to do
                                the
                                same.

                                Stepping back a bit, unless our documents
and witnesses
                are
                crystal
                                clear on
                                the implied contract theory and we have a
clear fact
                pattern
                for
                                detrimental
                                reliance, I wouldn't lick our chops and be
confident
                that we
                got them on
                                this liability.  I am willing to advance an
argument for
                posture
                                purposes in
                                order to force some conclusion on the PO
terms that they
                have attempted
                                to
                                open up.  And with what little I know thus
far, I would
                encourage we try
                                to
                                strike a deal in lieu of another lawsuit.

                                David H. Lund, Jr.
                                Assistant General Counsel
                                National Energy Production Corporation
                                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                                Bothell, WA 98011
                                425-415-3138
                                Fax: 425-415-3032
                                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From:   B-Galen Torneby
                                                Sent:   Wednesday, August
29, 2001 1:22
                PM
                                                To:     B-David Lund
                                                Cc:     B-Bob Black; B-Don
Campbell;
                B-Greg
                Tardanico;
                                B-Mike Ranz
                                                Subject:        Foster
Wheeler suggested
                language for
                                delay
                                damages

                                                 << File: mom-0822.doc >> <<
File:
                8&13.doc
                >> David,

                                                I am forwarding an email
from Mr. Garry
                Greatrix,
                                Project
                                Manager, Foster Wheeler Ltd.  Please read
the document
                attached entitled
                                8&13.doc.  This has been presented as
revised language
                to
                "all NEPCO
                                contracts" from Foster Wheeler.  This
suggested language
                has
                been
                                presented
                                as endorsed by Foster Wheeler legal and
executive
                management.  The FW
                                team
                                explained that this language resulted from
what they
                have
                experienced
                                with
                                NEPCO on recent projects, specifically
Linden 6 and
                Kendall
                and that
                                they
                                cannot sign the purchase contract without
it.

                                                Since this affects more than
the Lake
                Worth
                Project I
                                felt
                                any acceptance or dialog regarding FW's
suggested
                language
                would need to
                                be
                                reviewed and approved by NEPCO legal and
executive team.

                                                Galen J. Torneby
                                                Project Manager
                                                National Energy Production
Corporation
                (NEPCO)
                                                11831 North Creek Parkway
North
                                                Bothell,  WA  98011  USA

                                                Tel:   425-415-3052
                                                Cell:  425-922-0475
                                                Fax:  425-415-3098
                                                email:
<mailto:galen.torneby@nepco.com>
                                < <mailto:galen.torneby@nepco.com>>

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From: Greatrix, Garry
                [ <mailto:Garry_Greatrix@fwc.com>]
                                < <mailto:[mailto:Garry_Greatrix@fwc.com]>>
                                                Sent: Wednesday, August 29,
2001 6:47 AM
                                                To: Galen.Torneby@nepco.com
                                < <mailto:Galen.Torneby@nepco.com>>
                                ; Richard.Skibinski@nepco.com
                < <mailto:Richard.Skibinski@nepco.com>> ;
                                Martin.Tollefson@nepco.com
                < <mailto:Martin.Tollefson@nepco.com>> ;
                                dlabine@nepcan.com
< <mailto:dlabine@nepcan.com>> ;
                sketler@nepcan.com
                                < <mailto:sketler@nepcan.com>> ; ltoth@nepcan
                < <mailto:ltoth@nepcan>>  .com;
                                Don.Campbell@nepco.com
< <mailto:Don.Campbell@nepco.com>> ;
                Braid, Alan;
                                Kirk,
                                Bob; Baiton, Darren; Hildebrandt, Bob;
McKenna, Richard;
                Jonker, Chris;
                                Ratelle, Leo; Rajhans, Shekhar; Dueck, Rob;
Shaffer,
                Edward;
                McNinch,
                                Bob;
                                Jansen, Bruna; McDonald, Robin; Copsey, Dick
                                                Subject: NEPCO Lake Worth -
Minutes of
                Meeting - August
                                22,
                                2001

                                                     Please find attached
Minutes of our
                Project Design
                                Review Meeting
                                                at
                                                     NEPCAN offices
Wednesday August 22,
                2001.

                                                     Discussion and Action
items are as
                noted for
                                followup
                                by
                                                     NEPCO/NEPCAN/FW
accordingly.

                                                     Best regards,

                                                     Garry Greatrix
                                                     FW Project Manager

**********************************************************************
                                This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp.
and/or its
                relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
privileged material
                for
                the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
                distribution or
                disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
                recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact
                the
                sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
                enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments
                hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)
and do not
                create
                or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or
                any
                of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and
                may
                not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or
                otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


ARTICLES INCLUDED IN THE BINDER

FYI ARTICLES - NOT INCLUDED IN BINDER    ARTICLES EMAILED TO REBECCA SMITH -
WSJ


Tim,

Please forward this to the appropriate person.

Scott Berkman with Bruggers Bagels is looking to buy gas delivered to their
chain of stores.  He mentioned locations in Minn, Iowa, Detroit, Pitt,
Cleveland, Boston, and Albany.  His phone number is 802-660-4020 ext. 264.  I
would apprectiate it if someone would contact him regarding this supply.
Thanks.

Daren


This past weekend was the MS 150 bike tour from Houston to Austin.  This was
my third year riding in the event, and it keeps getting better every year.

We started out bright and early on Saturday morning with some 9,500 other
riders eager to make the 175 mile trip to Austin.  Team Enron was first out
of the gate again this year.  The course was more congested than last year
because of the huge increase in ridership.  The event has been growing 20
percent each year.  The crowd started to thin out after about 15 miles, and
it was smooth sailing until lunch in Bellville.  After a quick sandwich, I
was on my way again to LaGrange.  There were a few more hills this year than
last, and the wind started to pick up towards the end.  Visions of a cold
Miller Lite and a relaxing message inspired me onward.  I arrived in LaGrange
about 1:15, plenty of time to shower and relax in the tent before Enron's
famous barbecue dinner.

The next morning, we awoke bright and early to the call to the MS Society's
pancake breakfast.  Getting up at 5am and back on your bike after having
ridden 100 miles the previous day was no fun task, but everything was fine
after about 10 miles.  Sunday morning was fairly uneventful until the
infamous Bastrop State Park with its killer hills.  After the park was lunch,
then the homestretch to Austin.  This year we had a nice tailwind to help us
along.

Last year, with the support of people like you, the Texas MS society raised
over $3.5 million for multiple sclerosis research.  This year, we will
certainly break through that goal. Each of us probably know at least one
person touched by this terrible disease, and this money goes a long way
towards finding a cure.

If I haven't already collected your pledge, I'd appreciate it if you'd drop
it by.  For those of you not on 45, I'll stop by your floor sometime next
week.  Thank you for your support!

Brian

_____________________
Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


-
California Changes Stance on Refunds
Two Sides Far Apart In Energy Talks
By Peter Behr
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 6, 2001; Page E01
California officials have abruptly shifted tactics in their attempt to
recover billions of dollars in alleged overcharges for electricity, saying
they may reduce their demands for huge refunds if generators renegotiate $43
billion in long-term electricity contracts that the state signed this year.
Gov. Gray Davis (D) said part of the $8.9 billion in refunds the state is
seeking could be offset by reductions in energy prices in the long-term
contracts, whose costs have become a growing political embarrassment for
Davis.
"We've made suggestions, we've offered various ways in which people could get
us $8.9 billion," Davis told the San Jose Mercury News in a report yesterday.
"You can renegotiate our existing contracts and save us money. However you
want to do it, it's just got to net out close to $8.9 billion."
The new offer was introduced this week into the closed negotiations over a
California settlement being conducted in Washington by Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Judge Curtis L. Wagner Jr., according to sources close
to the negotiations.
Yesterday, Wagner said he may issue his own preliminary finding today on the
amount of overcharges if California officials and the generators cannot reach
a compromise.
"What I'm trying to do is get people in a settlement mood," Wagner told
reporters. "In the event we're unable to do that, [Friday] at some point I
may offer a preliminary assessment." The settlement conference is set to
conclude on Monday.
Wagner, FERC's chief administrative judge, has been trying to push both sides
toward a compromise that would resolve the huge energy pricing controversy.
Mountainous energy prices have bankrupted California's largest utility,
drained billions of dollars out of the state treasury and put Davis at
sword's point with generators that help keep the state's lights on.
Last Friday, Wagner rebuked Davis's chief representative, Michael Kahn,
chairman of California Independent Grid Operator -- the state's power grid
manager -- indicating that the state's demand for nearly $9 billion in
refunds from power generators and marketers was too high, sources said.
Wagner's settlement conference, which has involved more than 100 lawyers for
all sides, is closed to the public and media.
Wagner complained last month that Kahn was following a political agenda, and
his lack of independence in the negotiations was such a "joke" that the
parties might as well wear "clown suits," according to a Dow Jones report
confirmed by sources close to the talks.
But he has also criticized the generators and power marketers, led by Reliant
Energy Inc., Williams Energy Services, Duke Energy and Southern Co., for
failing to make serious settlement offers, these sources said. The suppliers
have offered to refund $600 million, provided the state is able to call off
various California lawsuits demanding far larger refunds, sources said.
Wagner's leverage is his ability to propose his own refund figure to FERC's
commissioners. FERC has tentatively called for $124 million in refunds, but
now is taking a harder line on preventing a new escalation of California's
electricity prices this summer and is likely to be receptive to a higher
refund figure, some energy analysts believe.
Davis's tactical change, offering to make the long-term contracts part of an
overall settlement, comes amid growing criticism of what the state will have
to pay for energy under those deals.
California's energy calamity stemmed in large part from its failed
deregulation plan, which relied heavily on short-term power purchases at
volatile "spot market" prices. When energy costs shot upward last summer, so
did the state's electricity bills.
In response, Davis's aide, S. David Freeman, and his staff began negotiating
long-term power contacts with suppliers. The $43 billion in deals signed so
far would require the state to pay about $70 per hour for a megawatt of power
for a large part of the electricity it will need over the next 10 years.
That's well under the average of $250 per megawatt-hour that the state was
paying at the beginning of this year, but above current power prices -- and
considerably higher than what electricity may cost in the next decade, energy
analysts say.
A new agreement to lower those contract prices could relieve political
pressure on Davis and focus settlement negotiations away from the state's
controversial demand for the $8.9 billion refund. Davis will argue that
reducing future power charges that his administration negotiated should count
as a "refund" because the deals were reached "under commercial duress,"
according to sources close to Wagner's negotiations.
Industry supporters say Davis's refund figure is impossible to justify.
"There's no benchmark for what a fair and reasonable price should be," said
Michael Zenger, California director of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.
The state's advocates counter that if FERC enforced a "just and reasonable"
standard for power prices based on operating costs and a generous profit, the
overcharges by all sellers could easily reach the $9 billion figure.
"It's not rocket science, but it does require the regulators to regulate,"
said Frank Wolak, a Stanford University economist who heads an oversight
committee for the California grid.
Those polar-opposite views have left both sides in Wagner's conference room
"billions of dollars apart," as the talks approached their final weekend,
sources said.
, 2001 The Washington Post Company


Dan,
Thank you for the opportunity.  I am open today until 2:30 (I have meetings
from 3:00 - 5:00), or tomorrow before noon, and after 4:00.  Wednesday also
looks good (you pick)!

Thanks!

Jeff

	Daniel Coleman
	12/04/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Craig H Brown/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Vulcan Signs

Jeff,
Please review the note below, and let's discuss at your convenience.

Daniel Coleman, C.P.M.
Enron Global Strategic Sourcing
Sourcing Portfolio Leader - Construction Services
(713) 646-7028

----- Forwarded by Daniel Coleman/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 10:51 AM -----

	Bob Hamlin <bhamlin@vulcaninc.com>
	11/02/2000 04:26 PM

		 To: "'daniel.coleman@enron.com'" <daniel.coleman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Change Places

Hello

I hear from Leonard that he had a very good meeting with you last week in
Houston.  We are hearing from quite a few people and the business is
beginning to flow.   On that subject Leonard did pass on to me that the
signed contract is "on the way".

The purpose of this e-mail is inquire about Enron's ability to
provide/supply natural gas to our company.  We consume quite a bit of
natural gas relatively speaking in our aluminum furnace.   I believe last
year we spent about $500,000.

As we both know the price of natural gas is rising.  It never hurts to check
and see if better deals are out there.  If this is of any interest, please
pass on to the appropriate person/group who would handle.  The can contact
me first and then I will turn over to our person here.  Thanks

Bob Hamlin
Vice President
Vulcan Utility Signs & Products
800-426-1314


http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/letter_from_america/newsid_216000/21699
4.stm


[IMAGE]	?

In the current installment of designzine.com,  you may want to look into some
of the new articles from our ,zine members.

In the 20th-anniversary issue of Metropolis,  Blair Kamin is unhappy about
Mayor Daley and Chicago architecture. And, encouraged  by mad-cow hysteria in
Europe, Claude Fischler offers some fascinating insights  into love, death,
food, and consumerism, in [dizajn]  Le journal. These are merely two of a
dozen articles from the best design  magazines published today.

In the Audio  Section, you can listen, if you wish, to my commentary on the
passing  of New York designer Lloyd Schwan.

The Calendar  continues to be the most popular feature on site.

And make sure you visit designstand.com,  our design-store companion site?

Cordially,

Mel Byars
Editorial Director
designzine.com

?

?

?


Ramona,  where will this meeting be.  I've asked that Lindy and TK sit in on this.  Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 4:45 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Frazier, Perry
Subject:	FERC Order in TW Negotiated Rates requiring changes in TW Oper Capacity report

Perry - We lost you on the original e-mail but definitely need your involvement.

Kim - Would you or someone in the TW commercial group be interesting in attending this meeting?
It's Monday, 1-2 PM.  Location to be determined.

Other Invitees include: Glen Hass, Mary Draemer (Ramona isn't available), Toby Kuehl, Darrel Schoolcraft (out of office), Maria Pavlou,
Ranelle Paladino & Rita Bianchi,

From original meeting notice:
Are all of you available to discuss the changes to the Operationally Available Capacity report that the Commission is requiring of TW?  In case you haven't heard, FERC has specifically stated that TW needs to add a column to its Operationally Available Capacity report to capture day to day available sustainable capacity .  We would like to discuss how to get this changed within the 15 day timeframe that we were given.  This is a separate issue from the new California report that all pipelines serving California have to do by Sept. 30th.

Ramona, can you locate a room for this discussion?  Omaha will be in 7C1 extension 7017.  If anyone else needs to be included in this discussion, please invite them.  Thanks.

Ranelle & Rita


Yes.   His phone number is 503-464-8481.   I forwarded the resume and cover letter this morning, so I would wait at least one day.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Darrin Presto <Darrin_Presto@RSD.EDU>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Darrin+20Presto+20+3CDarrin+5FPresto+40RSD+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Kev,

Send me Greg Wolfe's phone number.  Don't you think I ought to
talk to him myself?

DP


Marcia,

I have completed my review of the revised Special Revisions my remarks are as
follows:

We do not agree to the first paragraph.

1. Agreed
2. Agreed
3. Agreed
4. Agreed
5. Agreed
6. Agreed with change in wording.'
7. Agreed
8. Agreed to with exception of (ii).

We do not agree to suggested addition of Sections 10.3 and 10.4.

9 and 10.  Agreed
11. Agreed
12. Agreed
13. We do not agree to this language.

Because the Special Provisions are part of the agreement there is no need for
additional signature.

Finally,  Enron perfers to be confirming party of all transactions.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I don't believe I forwarded this to you.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 11:54
AM ---------------------------

Herman Manis
07/24/2000 10:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: VEPCO/FYI

Thanks.  I think we have alot of the same accounting issues here if the PPA
is construed to be a lease.  If it is a lease, we have similar spending and
EPC concerns as our other deals.  Do we know who the O&M contractor will be?
If ENA or affiliate, we should not take on plant risk - just make sure our
fair value O&M fee is the only amount at risk under the O&M agreement.  As of
Friday, AA told us that even in a non-offtake situation, they may say we are
in a lease if we take on plant risk through an O&M agreement.  This was new
news to us.

To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VEPCO/FYI

I'm working with the commerial team on on PPA (and associated transactions)
for Virginia Power.  The project involves the construction of  a peaker to
supply some/most of the power, with the ability to supply from the market as
well.  The plant has an 01 service date, so things are really picking up.

Matt and Herman, this is the transaction we discussed with Heather a few
weeks ago.

Items on the immediate to do list include:

Executing a land option agreement
Closing on the land (or assign to City of Rocky Mount, and let them close)
Selling/transferring the land to the City of Rocky Mount; negotiate long term
lease
Negotiating a PILOT agreement (payment in lieu of taxes) with the City
Negotiating fuel supply agreements
Selecting/contracting with EPC contractor - can it be NEPCO?
Long lead equipment purchases (?) - could be home for LM 6000's, but other
equipment may be needed
Negotiate interconnection agreement

This deal is showing a lot of life, so I thought it might be helpful to give
you a heads up.

Kay


The concert was great!  We had box seats so we drank for free, which is always a plus.  As far as Enron goes we definitely need this Dynegy deal!  What's up with you this weekend?  We are going to the wine tasting thing on Saturday, right?  What about Friday night want to play doctor?

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Rawlings-Curtis [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: Good Morning!

Just wanted to see how the concert was and find out what you think about
Dynegy possibly buying out Enron.  Is that a good or bad thing, or does it
even matter?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


For those of us in Enron Americas, the following is for your information.

I contacted Eric Thode, Director of Public Relations, to ask when we should
start converting our business cards, letterhead, envelopes, etc., to say
Enron Americas.  He was traveling at the time he received my message but had
Jennifer Walker in his office call me back.  Eric recommended we use Enron
Americas when ordering anything new with the company name on it from this day
forward.  He thought work was being done on the "big announcement" about
getting the name changed on everything, and he would contact me next week to
discuss.  When I hear anything new, I'll let you know.

Contact me if you have any questions.


Tana:  You offered to send the TXU agreement for multiple confirms.  Thanks.
Sara


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed away
from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its ISO and
PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other parts of the
country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in priorities for
utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path 15"?  Does that
control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there other examples and
are there links between these "preferences" and the current problems in
California?  As we are trying to convert reliability and pricing concerns
into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to have available to us.


Sara,
In response to your request to Michael Brown et al for a copy of all
brokerage agreements I attach the only other brokerage agreement that our
archive department could find.  The other recipients of your email have let
me know that they do not have any brokerage agreements.

Let me know if you need anything else.
Many thanks
Lorna


No le hace.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elbertson, Janette
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gray, Barbara N.; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Keohane, Peter; Lundstrom, Bruce; McCullough, Travis; Murray, Julia; Sager, Elizabeth; Sanders, Richard B.; Schuler, Lance; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Tweed, Sheila
Cc:	Adams, Suzanne; Crawford, Sharon; Farrell, Keegan; Foy, Tracy; Garcia, Nita; George, Carolyn; Haldeman, Sandy; Hoelscher, Wendi; Keiser, Holly; Rozycki, Joanne; Sweet, Twanda; Wright, Alice; Zucha, Theresa
Subject:	Monday Morning Meetings

I am taking a poll for Mark Haedicke.  He may need to change the time for the Monday morning meetings.  Would you prefer the meeting start time change to 10:30 a.m. or 11:00 a.m.?

Please let me know as soon as possible.  Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail address:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


If it is the one I am thinking of it does.  I haven't seen one for a few
months.

Pat,  Will you make sure Robert sends one to me via email.

Thanks
Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 08:54
AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
06/28/2000 07:59 PM
To: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Industrials

Gary,

Does the workhseet mentioned below assist you with the monthly operations
related to the industrial customers?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
07:57 PM ---------------------------
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

 First of the month  industrials are coming along fine.  I will finalize my
pathing tomorrow, Thursday,  and set up buybacks and swings by the
    end of day Friday.

     The industrial "Buyback & Deficiency Deals" worksheet  has captured the
necessary data to help Gas Control & the on-call scheduler as well as
      myself and Client Services.
      I  will have a preliminary worksheet done by the end of day Friday.

      I am on vacation during the week of July 5th thru July 10th.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Pat Clynes @ ENRON                           06/28/2000 12:45 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

Robert,
How do we look on the industrial deadlines?  Please let me know.   Thanks,
Pat

Daren J Farmer@ECT
06/28/2000 11:19 AM
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Industrials

When will the buybacks and swings be set up for July?  I am a little
concerned with the long weekend coming up.  I believe that we agreed that
these would be set up by the 3rd work day, which would be Friday the 7th.
(Six days of flow.)  I definitely don't think that we should any later.  It
would be great if this could be handled sooner, miimizing our economic impact.

Additionally, we need to get the Industrial spreadsheet up and running
again.  This report is very beneficial to Gas Control, industrial traders and
schedulers on call.

Let me know what you think.

D


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have enclosed initial drafts of the closing memorandum and of a letter
from ENA confirming that it has no objection to and will not act in
furtherance of frustrating execution of the financing documents between
Salmon and PPL.  Please review and advise of any comments.

We await receipt of comments to the escrow disbursement instruction letter.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 140424v1
  140366v4

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - ENA Ltr to Delta Lender re Form of Agmt.DOC
 - SalmonClosingMemorandum.DOC


[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE][IMAGE]      [IMAGE] Market Coverage and World News Live Yahoo! FinanceVision brings you the latest from Washington, New York, and across the globe.  Coverage is live and  interactive, including news conferences with the President, the Pentagon, and the FBI. Guests and analysts answer your questions.  View continuous financial updates from the New York Stock Exchange  and the NASDAQ Marketsite. No television in your office? No problem. Watch FinanceVision  at your desk.   Movies in Your Mailbox Find out what's new at the movies via email updates from Yahoo! Movies. Local showtimes, information about new   releases, and the latest buzz from Hollywood -- delivered direct to your inbox. Subscribe  for free today.  Take Control of Your Remote Tune in to Yahoo! TV  for what 's new on the tube.  Survivor is back,  and so is our popular Survivor Pick'em Game .  Play with a group of friends, family, or co-workers, or join a public group to compete with fans across the United States. For an opinionated look at this year's TV lineup, don't miss the Fall TV Guide .  Make a Personal Connection Looking for someone special? A new friend to hang out with? Millions of people use Yahoo! Personals  -- the person you're looking for might be on Yahoo! looking for you!  Search the ads or post your own for free. Then connect for less than $20 per month.  Take advantage of this special for new members:  Join ClubConnect now and get your first month free. Offer available until November 30, 2001.      More Great Ways to Yahoo!    Short Takes   *  Take the Court   - Basketball season is just around the corner. Get in on the action with Yahoo! Sports Fantasy NBA . Run your own  team of real National Basketball Association players from the season's  opening tip to the final battles in April.  *  My Red, White, and Blue Yahoo!  - Update your personalized My Yahoo! page with a custom theme. Choose from Stars & Stripes, Old Glory, Pink Ribbons, your favorite NBA team theme, Sanrio's Hello Kitty, or Yahoo!Delic, a perennial favorite.  *  Yahoo! Travel  -   Find easy air, hotel, and rental car reservations, vacation and cruise packages, and the latest resources  for travelers. *  Yahoo! Finance Bond Center  -   Everything you need to know about bonds and their increasing popularity among investors in today's uncertain markets.  *  Make Yahoo! Your Home Page  - If your browser lived here , you'd be home now .      Cool Stuff   *  Halloween Central  - Shop for costumes, decorations, candy, and treats for the spookiest day of the year. *  Bobbing for Bargains  - Bid on scary stuff in the Halloween Showcase from Yahoo! Auctions. *  Can't Wait to Read?  - Try an ebook -- a digital version of a print book that you can download and read.  We've got your favorites, from Nora Roberts  to Stephen King  (Riding the Bullet -- only $2).  *  Yahoo! Photos  -   Need more room for your digital pictures? Sign up for 50MB more photo storage -- only $29.95 per year. *  Sit Courtside With Spike Lee  - Bid for the chance to watch Michael Jordan and the Wizards battle the Knicks in New York on October 30.   To support the families of those most affected by the tragic events of September 11th, all proceeds from the winning bid will be donated to the UFA Widows and Children Fund.       Copyright ? 2001 Yahoo! Inc.

   You received this email because your account information indicates that you wish to be contacted about special offers, promotions and Yahoo! features.  If you do not want to receive further mailings from Yahoo! Delivers, unsubscribe by clicking here  or by replying to this email.  You may also modify  your delivery options at any time.   To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons  in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy . \


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/customer-carebanner.jpg>
SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care in the United States and Canada to determine:

The leading software providers
Drivers of utility technology decisions
Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales
New market opportunities
Growing/shrinking software markets

Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp> and
contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/scientech_logo_small.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/IssueAlert_Logo_188.jpg>

October 23, 2001

U.S. Power Firms Plunge Into Europe's Trading Market;
U.K.'s NETA Rules May Set Continental Standard

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>

[News item from Reuters] U.S.-owned Entergy-Koch Trading (NYSE: EKT) is boosting its European electricity and weather trading business with expansion in Germany and the Netherlands. "After a successful start, we plan to substantially increase our volume of European power, power options and weather trading next year," said Uday Narang, managing director of European trading. EKT also completed the paperwork needed to start trading electricity in France and Austria, although its immediate focus would be Germany and the Netherlands.

Analysis: The announcement from Entergy-Koch Trading that it will significantly increase its European power trading business is by no means unique. In fact, a recent scan of announcements from U.S. power firms tells a similar story. Dynegy announced last week that it is seeking acquisitions to strengthen its European operations, in an effort to "replicate its strong U.S. energy trading platform in Europe." TXU said that it expects "sharply higher profits this year" from European energy trading as its electricity trading volumes have soared across the Continent. For the first nine months of 2001, TXU reportedly traded 211 terawatt hours of wholesale electricity in continental Europe, mostly in Germany, which compared to 97 terawatt hours in all of 2000. Further still, UtiliCorp just announced that it and an unnamed financial partner will be purchasing Midlands Electricity, the fourth-largest regional electric utility in the United Kingdom, which in addition to 38,000 miles of electric distribution lines owns a 1,875-MW power plant. The unrelated announcements have a common denominator: U.S. power firms are plunging into the European energy trading market in droves, despite some inherent governmental challenges and resistance toward embracing electric competition among some European countries. A new model in the United Kingdom, known as the new energy trading agreement (NETA) rules, appear to be facilitating more efficient trade in that country and could become the standard across the Continent.

The appeal of Europe's power market for U.S. energy companies is perhaps obvious. According to a Financial Times Energy report from late last year, demand growth for electricity in European countries over the next five years may prompt the need for an additional 69,000 MW of generating capacity to be built (an amount roughly equivalent to the generating capacity of ERCOT in Texas). In addition, like other developed areas of the world, Europe's energy consumption has grown over the last two years. U.S. power firms, who perhaps see their competitive opportunities as being rather limited in this country, have expanded operations in Europe, where electric privatization is occurring on a country-by-country basis. Consequently, the companies mentioned above join Williams, Enron, Duke, AEP, and Mirant (to name a few), which have established London trading offices.

Moreover, many of the U.S. power firms that expand into Europe start by accumulating generation assets in the United Kingdom, as represented by the UtiliCorp and Dynegy announcements. Much of this has to do with the fact that the United Kingdom began privatizing its electric market in the early 1990s and completed the process in May 1999 (after Norway, but well ahead of other European countries). However, there is a more important reason why U.S. energy firms may be drawn to U.K. power trading, and that is related to the area's unique rules for energy transactions, which were outlined in NETA and took effect in March of this year.

To appreciate the significance of the new NETA rules, it is important to first understand the context of the European market as a whole and the trading system that had been in place in the United Kingdom until earlier this year. The European Union has directed countries across the Continent to open their electric markets to competition. Toward this end, the commencement of competition in various European countries has included the following three approaches: 1) allowing end-users the right to select an alternative provider; 2) giving generation companies the right to use an incumbent power supplier's transmission and distribution network, otherwise known as third-party access; and 3) the introduction of energy trading, which has allowed an incumbent supplier to buy power on the wholesale market. This last point is significant, because some of the European countries have dismantled previously integrated, state-owned utilities and mandated the divestiture of generation assets.

At the end of 2000, approximately 68.4 percent of the European Union (EU) electricity market was open to competition. Privatization has theoretically enabled European power companies to expand beyond their traditional service territories and business lines into other countries (at least those that are open). That is the good news. However, the basic problem with this approach is that the European Union did not put standardized deadlines for the transition to a fully competitive marketplace, and thus various countries in Europe have developed their own timetables. For instance, Germany is fully privatized, while France has been notoriously hesitant to provide third-party access to competitors. In practice, this often means that one country may have an extremely complex system for transmission tariffs while its neighboring country may have not developed any standards at all. The other problem is that physical interconnections between countries are often deficient, which makes it difficult to transport power across borders. As a result, wholesale competition across the Continent is considered rather heterogeneous and lacking in comprehensive trading standards. The lack of standards is particularly acute as it relates to rules and tariffs for third-party access to the national grids on the Continent.

While these fundamental problems on the Continent are being resolved, the United Kingdom has moved ahead with what is generally perceived as a more efficient market because it offers one grid system, one balancing and settlement code, and one contract format. However, even the power trading market in the United Kingdom did not get off to an easy start. Up until March of this year, the U.K. power market operated under a pool / auction system. Under that model, generation companies offered electricity for sale, which was then pooled into an auction system where day-ahead bids were made and power was sold in half-hour increments. The model was quite significant because it was one of the first attempts in the world to create a competitive market for generation and it operated outside of governmental oversight.

However, the pool model in the United Kingdom became fraught with problems, mostly because observers believed that excessive opportunity existed for market manipulation. Given the concerns with the pool format, the United Kingdom began to formulate new rules for power trading in October 1998, which culminated in the NETA model that started this year. The key tenets that make NETA different from the previous pool model are:

Forwards and futures markets, which allow participants to form power sale deals using standardized contracts either on-the-day or several years in advance (as opposed to only day-ahead bids).
More flexibility regarding the kinds of contracts that buyers and sellers can negotiate (bilateral and multilateral contracts are allowed in the United Kingdom).
A new balancing mechanism covering ancillary services overseen by National Grid Co. (operating in a role similar to an ISO), which facilitates the various transactions to ensure reliability.
The administration of contracts linking wholesale supplies with demand (represented by individual meters), and the threat of strict penalties for participants whose positions do not match their metered volumes of electricity.

In a nutshell, NETA essentially sharpened the rules surrounding power trading in the United Kingdom to allow less opportunity for gaming. The system improvements have been successful, and more international power firms apparently believe that they stand a better chance of competing in the United Kingdom due to the NETA rules. Installation of the NETA system reportedly has caused a 315-percent increase in the number of contracts traded, a 25-percent drop in wholesale prices and a six-fold increase in the variety of products offered. As of early summer 2001, about 150 new participants had registered to participate under the NETA system, as compared with about 12 under the former model.

As noted, many believe that the NETA model will become a standard for the Continent as other European countries proceed with opening their wholesale markets to competition. In addition to the U.K.'s model, there are several active trading exchanges in Europe presently, although more are expected to emerge as the market becomes more competitive. The Nord Pool, with about 60 members, organizes trade in standardized physical and financial contracts, and provides current prices on electricity in both spot and futures markets. The Dutch Amsterdam Power Exchange has about 25 members and operates a spot market for electrical power. Smaller European exchanges, offering both spot and futures contracts, include the Switzerland Exchange and Germany's Leipzig Power Exchange in Frankfurt. In the meantime, I think we will continue to see additional U.S. power firms expanding into the European trading market, and using the United Kingdom as their launch pad.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 1-505-244-7613.

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.

  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=10/23/2001>


MBAers,

In light of the tough job market and importance of getting some quality face
time with recruiters this year...
The Leading Edge Technology Conference is hosting a special INVITATION ONLY
Recruiting Reception at this year's Conference on Saturday, Sept. 22nd at
6:00pm in the Wells Fargo Room.

What Companies are Sponsoring / Accepting Resumes?

  a.. JPMorgan Chase H&Q
  b.. HP
  c.. Accenture
  d.. Broadview
  e.. BEA
  f.. Fortune
  g.. NYSE
  h.. Business 2.0
  i.. Wideray

  This reception is the perfect opportunity for you to network with
companies that may or may not be holding official recruiting events on
campus this year.  We'll have wine, beer, appetizers and plenty of one on
one time.
HOW DO I GET INVITED?

How: PARTICIPATE IN THE RESUME DROP!

IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS BELOW

  a.. Submit a Resume only (no cover letter) to smolek@haas.berkeley.edu NOT
TO THE CAREER CENTER (don't worry - I won't read them)
  b.. Include the Company name in the Email Subject line and Your Name
(Joe_Smo.doc or pdf) as the doc. title.  Send a seperate email for each
company!!
  c.. First Year's - Resume in standard Haas format is preferred, but not
mandatory.

When:  BY WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 12TH AT 9:00 PM!!!  YES - TWO DAYS FROM NOW!

Who: Second Years or First Years - it's completely the company's option who
they choose to invite.  They will invite approximately 5 people.  Not all
sponsors may choose to participate, so send your resume in at your
discretion.

What: Remember, this is a networking / pre-interview opportunity.  This is
not a promise by any company to give offers or follow up with an official
interview.  But it is an indication that you have made the radar screen.
Some companies, like Broadview, are using this as the primary recruiting
event at Haas this fall.  You need not be registered for the conference to
attend the networking reception if you are invited.

Follow Up:  We will be notifing you if you are invited by Wednesday Sept.
19th.

What if I don't get Invited?: All these companies will have a general
sponsor table up all day at the conference where you are welcome to drop
your resume during the day or simply go to ask them questions.  However,
this option is only open to you if you are a registered conference attendee.

Questions:  While we are coordinating with the Career Center closely to put
this together for you, it is not an official career center event - so please
direct questions to either Sara Smolek or Jeff Clementz at the email
addresses below - PLEASE PLEASE - DO NOT EMAIL THE CAREER CENTER DIRECTLY!

smolek@haas.berkeley.edu        clementz@haas.berkeley.edu


eeks.  i'm sorry.  what does this mean?  i don't quite understand the code.

jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/22/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Mark Nobili <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Aaron Thomas <athomas@newenergy.com>, Michael
Rochman <rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>, Julee Malinowski-Ball <jmball@ns.net>,
Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Rich@ceert.org" <Rich@ceert.org>,
"Mflorio@turn.org" <Mflorio@turn.org>, Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com>,
Jackson Gualco <jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>, Ralph Cavanagh
<RCavanagh@nrdc.org>, Karen Mills <kmills@cfbf.com>, Dian Grueneich
<dgrueneich@gralgal.com>, Dominic DiMare <Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,
Bill Booth <wbooth@booth-law.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Matt Moretti <mmoretti@calhealth.org>, Keith
McCrea <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, Norm Plotkin <nplotkin@tfglobby.com>, Barbara
Barkovich <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@cmta.net>,
Delaney Hunter <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "lga@mother.com"
<lga@mother.com>, Wes Larson <wlarson@calstate.edu>, Vincent Stewart
<vincent.stewart@ucop.edu>, "gharrison@calstate.edu"
<gharrison@calstate.edu>, Lance Hastings <lhastings@cagrocers.com>,
"cra@calretailers.com" <cra@calretailers.com>, Will Brown <wbrown@lhom.com>,
"vjw@ceert.org" <vjw@ceert.org>, Richard Seguin <richard.seguin@kp.org>,
Dennis Flatt <dennis.flatt@kp.org>, Roger Richter <rrichter@calhealth.org>,
Ken Pietrelli <ken_pietrelli@ocli.com>, Les Spahnn <spahnn@hnks.com>, Chuck
Cole <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, Mike Monagan <mrmonagan@aol.com>, Tracy
Fairchild <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, Dave Finigan <davef@abag.ca.gov>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ABX 21

ABX 21 (a gut-and-amend) is going to be taken up in Assembly Energy
today, upon adjournment.  Language is not yet available.

Scott Govenar


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football292.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Members! It's time to get an early start on that New Year's resolution. MVP.com is offering FREE Standard Shipping in our Fitness Shop until 1/17/02. Click here to see what we have to offer.

Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here to apply online.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1228e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1228c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1228v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1228t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1227ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Martin Gramatica, K TB - TexOK Updated 12/28/01
Gramatica has still not been ruled out for Saturday's game, although the Buccaneers have signed veteran kicker Doug Brien as insurance. Even if Gramatica can play, he will be a very risky Fantasy starter.

Warrick Dunn, RB TB - TexOK Updated 12/28/01
Dunn's status is day to day with a toe injury. He is expected to play this week, but Mile Alstott has been the most productive back on the team in recent weeks.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - McKay Updated 12/28/01
Westbrook's status is day to day with a knee injury. He is expected to play this week.

MarTay Jenkins, WR ARI - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Jenkins may miss his second consecutive game with an ankle injury this week. Arnold Jackson would replace him as Arizona's third receiver.

Brian Finneran, WR ATL - Free Agent
Updated 12/28/01
Finneran is listed as probable with a knee injury. He is expected to play this week.

Tyrone Davis, TE GB - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Davis has been elevated to the No. 2 tight end slot over rookie David Martin. He will see a considerable amount of playing time now that he is healthy, because Green Bay employs many double tight end sets in the red zone.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01

Gadsden has been practicing this week and may be able to play. But his hamstring injury may limit his productivity.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - McKay Updated 12/28/01
McNair was limited in practice on Thursday. He is still expected to play this week, but he is a risky Fantasy starter because he will be less than 100 percent healthy.

Jimmy Smith, WR JAC - Hardtail Amigos Updated 12/28/01
Smith (flu) has missed practice time this week. He is still expected to play.

Joe Horn, WR NO - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Horn suffered a minor shoulder injury in practice on Thursday. He is expected to start this week.

Aaron Shea, TE CLE - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Shea (shoulder) has been placed on injured reserve. O.J. Santiago will continue to be Cleveland's No. 1 tight end while he is out.

Jason Brookins, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01

Brookins has returned to practice and is listed as probable. But he still may not see any game action until Week 17.

Emmitt Smith, RB DAL - Pink Panthers Updated 12/28/01
Micahel Wiley may miss this week's game with a hip injury. Smith is expected to appear on third downs this week as well as assuming his normal workload.

James Thrash, WR PHI - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Thrash (ankle) returned to practice on Thursday. he is expected to play this week.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Pink Panthers Updated 12/28/01
Walls missed practice on Thursday with a knee injury. He may be a gametime decision this week.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
A banged-up Smith Toe/knee)  will continue to start for the Falcons. But Dan Reeves has indicated Rodney Thomas will continue to get some work at halfback.

Bob Christian
, RB ATL - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Christian is day to day with a calf injury. He is expected to play this week.

Stephen Davis, RB WAS - TexOK Updated 12/28/01
Davis (knee) has returned to practice. He is expected to start this week.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01

Bouman took a few snaps Thursday but didn't appear to meet coach Dennis Green's "full strength" criteria for starting against Green Bay.   Spergon Wynn is likely to start Sunday, though coaches didn't discuss the issue after Thursday's practice. Bouman didn't participate in the team's morning walk-through, when players work on plays without fully suiting up. And during the portion of the regular practice that reporters were allowed to watch, Wynn took more snaps than Bouman. A trainer said Wynn continued to take more snaps later in the closed portion of practice.

Jerome Bettis, RB PIT - The Rocks Updated 12/28/01

Bettis, sidelined by a groin injury, returned to the practice field Thursday for the first time in a month. "Still questionable," coach Bill Cowher said. "He did more today. We'll see how he feels (Friday) and go from there. We'll take it day to day."

Doug Brien, K IND - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
Brien signed a one-year contract Thursday night with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, who will use him against Baltimore if Martin Gramatica can't kick this week. Gramatica strained his right hamstring during a 48-21 victory over the Saints last week. Coach Tony Dungy hasn't ruled him out for Saturday night's game against Baltimore, however the club wanted to have a backup plan in case the Pro Bowl kicker isn't ready.

Ahman Green, RB GB - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01
According to the Pro Football News and Injury Report, Green has asthma, but he has practiced fully this week and will start against the Vikings.

James Thrash, WR PHI - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
Thrash is listed as questionable with an ankle injury, but he is expected to play against the Giants.

Patrick Jeffers, WR CAR - Free Agent
Updated 12/27/01
Jeffers may see some increased playing time this week because of Muhsin Muhammad's persistent toe problems. Isaac Byrd, however, still should start in Muhammad's place.

Sebastian Janikowski, K OAK - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
Janikowski (groin) has been kicking in practice. He is expected to play this week.

Terrence Wilkins, WR IND - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
Wilkins (hamstring) has returned to practice. He may be able to play this week.

Stephen Alexander, TE WAS - Top Dogs Updated 12/27/01
Alexander (leg) was placed on injured reserve, officially ending his season. Walter Rasby will continue to start in his place, but Zeron Flemister has emerged as the team's best receiving tight end with Alexander out.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
The Seattle Times says Hasselbeck's season might be over. Mike Holmgren said he would only use him in an emergency this week, and the Seahawks coach may elect to have Hasselbeck use the season's final two games to rest his injured!
 s!
houlder. Trent Dilfer will start at San Diego this week.

Amos Zereoue, RB PIT - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
Zereoue missed practice on Wednesday with a shoulder injury. He is listed as probable for this week.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01
Bouman practiced without pads on Wednesday. If he cannot practice fully on Thursday, Spergon Wynn will get the start this week.

More Updates

Teams, Rosters

		Grigsby
Mike Grigsby

Player	TM
Pos	Status	Next	Bye

Manning, Peyton	IND	QB	Active	@STL	Week 4

Garner, Charlie	OAK	RB	Active	@DEN	Week 6

Faulk, Marshall	STL	RB	Active	IND	Week 8

Pickens, Carl	 	WR	Active	bye	Week

Crowell, Germane	DET	WR	Active	CHI	Week 3

Galloway, Joey	DAL	WR	Active	SF	Week 6

Conway, Brett	WAS	K	Active	@NO	Week 9

Jaguars	JAC	DT	Active	KC	Week 5

Aikman, Troy	 	QB	Reserve	bye	Week

[Morris, Bam]	 	RB	Reserve	bye	Week

Barber, Tiki	NYG	RB	Reserve	@PHI	Week 12

Price, Peerless	BUF	WR	Reserve	@NYJ	Week 5

Ward, Hines	PIT	WR	Reserve	@CIN	Week 2

Chargers	SD	DT	Reserve	SEA	Week 17

Total Active Players: 8
Total Reserve Players: 6

NFL Injuries for Grigsby

Updated	Player	Team	Pos	Injury
Expected Return

10/24/01	Crowell, Germane	DET	WR	Knee	On IR. Out for the rest of the season.

12/26/01	Galloway, Joey	DAL	WR	Hip	Expected to play this week

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Here is the model we were just looking at.. Again, it will be changing!
Thanks
Ben


Invoice
Number
Invoice
Date
Invoice
Amount
Invoice
Due Date

The following is the status of the invoice taken from the IBUYIT Payables today.

Company
Code
Vendor
Number and  Name
Current User Inbox
or Resolved
440677
22-Oct-01
$36,000.00
22-Oct-01
1596
5000079072 JOHN L. WORTHAM & SON, L.
ROGERS HERNDON
Sent to User
KATHY BASS
11/07/2001  01:06 pm
Unresolved Item sent from SAP
11/12/2001  04:02 pm
Forward to User
KATHY BASS
Forwarded to ROGERS HERNDON
Comment
KATHY BASS
11/12/2001  04:02 pm
Surety Bond. Contact Richard Ring if you have any questions


GET DAD SOMETHING HE'LL REALLY USE IN THE TEXANS ONLINE STORE!
Father's Day is a celebration of Dad as well as all of the men who have
acted as father figures in your life. Pop Warner ball, teaching you to play
fair, Sunday in front of the TV with the hometown team - all courtesy of the
big guy. So what better way to express your gratitude and love than with a
gift from his favorite team?
Team Button Down
Comfortable and stylish, this rugged blue button down would be a good
weekend look for any Texans dad!
http://www.houstontexans.com/home/general.cfm?cont_id=62620&NSLN=060301

Red Puma Cap
This is a big seller! Help dad keep that Texas sun out of his eyes while
showing off his Texans pride!
http://www.houstontexans.com/home/general.cfm?cont_id=62620&NSLN=060301

Neon Clock
Beautifully constructed and made to order, this huge clock can be the
centerpiece of Dad's office, or even the family room (with mom's permission
that is)!
http://www.houstontexans.com/home/general.cfm?cont_id=62620&NSLN=060301

Commemorative Coin
Want to give something different this year? This 2002 Texans Inaugural year
commemorative coin can be treasured forever.
http://www.houstontexans.com/home/general.cfm?cont_id=62620&NSLN=060301

The Houston Texans store is a great place to find gifts for the graduate in
your life as well! Visit the store for all your gift-giving needs.

MEMORIES
"My father coached me in Little League baseball, he was a member of the
booster club. He was always very involved, and he would come to all the
games in high school and college, no matter where we were playing. He was my
toughest critic, but also my biggest supporter. My fondest memory was during
my sophomore year in college. I went down and worked out at the Phillies
complex in Florida before the Mount Union baseball team went down there for
our spring trip. My father went down and spent the whole week with me. He
loved baseball and to enjoy that atmosphere with him was very meaningful."
-- Texans Coach Dom Capers on his relationship with his father

"My dad and I are very different people, and about the only thing we have in
common is our love of sports. He calls me every week, and we talk for about
an hour. Probably 80 percent to 90 percent of what we talk about is
football. Anybody who overhears our conversations must think we're nuts. I'm
looking forward to the Texans playing next year, so my dad and I can start
going to a couple of Texans games a year at Reliant."
-- Posted in the Texans message boards by Columbia

Have a memory you'd like to share about your own dad? Then log on and post
it in the message boards!
http://www.houstontexans.com/fans/fanzonemain.cfm

---
You are currently subscribed to texansnews as: shendri@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-texansnews-183211D@newsletter.houstontexans.com


I will be on vacation Friday, March 24th,27th,28th and maybe 29th. In my
absence please call Jackie Young @ 3-9497.
 Susan {@ 3-5796} will back up Jackie during my absence for Industrial
activity.


The United Way touches the lives of over 50% of the families on the Texas Gulf Coast.  We would like to encourage you to take a few minutes today to help those children, adults and senior citizens who need a helping hand.

Please click on https://hrglobal.enron.com/ and complete your online pledge.  You will need your GIS ID (which is your "9" number, not your "P" number) and password.  If you are not sure what your ID and password are, please go to https://ehronline.enron.com, click the "Accept" button, and then click on "Forgot your User ID or Password?"  You can also call the HRGIM Help Desk at ext. 3-5666 for assistance.

John and Louise


Baby shower photo from last night.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 08:16
AM ---------------------------

Trogg522@aol.com on 09/07/2000 09:10:37 PM
To: chris.germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Photo


In order to clarify the memo regarding the reorganization of EECC, we want to
clarify that NEPCO, as a stand alone entity, will report to Larry Izzo inside
of EES.


click to shop
 1/2 OFF Select Sportcoats Reg SALE       Navy/Black Herringbone Sportcoats  $295.00 $147.50 Silk Blend Sportcoats  $295.00 $147.50     1/2 OFF Tuxedos Reg SALE       Plain Front Wool Tuxedo Trousers  $125.00 $62.50 Pleated Wool Tuxedo Trousers  $125.00 $62.50 White Tuxedo Dinner Jackets  $295.00 $147.50 Black Notch Collar Tuxedo Jackets  $295.00 $147.50 Shawl Collar Tuxedo Jackets  $295.00 $147.50 3-Button Tuxedo Jackets  $295.00 $147.50 Double-Breasted Tuxedo Jackets  $295.00 $147.50     1/2 OFF Fall Knit Shirts Reg SALE       Navy Windowpane Long Sleeve Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Navy Large Open Plaid Long Sleeve Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Wine-Heather Long Sleeve Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Black/Khaki Long Sleeve Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Olive Open Plaid Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Heathered Windowpane Polos  $49.50 $24.75 Interlock Mocks  $35.00 $17.50 Patterned Sportshirts  $49.50 $24.75 	 	click here to shop   click here to shop   click here to shop
		 For Discount: Use Code HF44 at checkout  Valid Online and In Stores - click here  for a store nearest you. Discount on Regular Prices Only. Not Valid on Prior purchases.  Free Shipping on all U.S. online orders $175 or more.  How to redeem online: 1. After placing items in your shopping basket, enter code HF44 in the Coupon Code box 2. Click input, the page will reload and reflect the appropriate discount(s) above 3. Save Big Now - www.josbank.com

Click here to change or remove your subscription.  [IMAGE]

CLICK HERE TO FORWARD TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY!


The attached confirm has been signed and is being sent to me by federal
express.  It did not arrive on Friday so it should be here next week.  I am
sending you this in case you get a deal ticket for the deal being documented
by this confirm.  They have  also signed a master to cover this transaction.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 03:04 PM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	12/20/2000 04:19 PM

		 To: "Mike Cesario" <MCesario@ormet.com>@ENRON
		 cc: ina.rangel@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Ormet Agreement

Mike,
 I have added the language as item 4 under Other to the Transaction
Agreement.  If okay, please accept the changes, print, have signed and
forward to me for further handling.


We are sending this letter to TVA today.  (Hardcopy sent to Cynthia).