That is fine.  I look forward to visiting with him.

Celeste

Vince J Kaminski
05/12/2000 08:56 AM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Brad Romine

Celeste,

As you may know, Brad Romine's dot.com venture fell apart.

The offer from Enron looks much better now. I have arranged for him
a number of different interviews (including one with you). I think we should
not be too
punitive and give him the 2nd chance. I am setting up for him interviews with
RAC,
EBS and Greg Whalley and he should be able to negotiate a good first rotation.

Please, give me a call if you have any other question.

Vince Kaminski


If required my cell number is 713-806-6294.

Any time of the day.


Hi Mum!  If you want to come to Houston for the July 8 art crawl, that would
be fun.  I plan to meet more of the gallery owners and talk to them about
what they do.  Who knows, having my own gallery might actually become part of
my long-range plan.  If not, I will have met some interesting people.

If you want to come to Houston sooner, I do not have much going on after my
Sat. a.m. class at Rice, although I do have to catch a plane to D.C. on
Monday morning.

The week is going OK.  All the tennis and swimming has left me with sore
muscles so this is my night off.  Am planning to do some more house chores so
I do not end up with another weekend like the last.

I'm still planning on coming to Austin next weekend, I'm just not sure when,
but I'll let you know.

Call if you get lonely!

Love,
Sooz

Camp2scott@aol.com on 06/22/2000 05:47:31 PM
To: Susan.Scott@enron.com
cc:

Subject: home

Hi, Sooz,

Got home about 1 p.m. today and can already feel my mood sinking--not ready
to get back into my solo mode.

Enjoyed being with the little bugaroo--even with the diarrhea, she was in a
good mood with the exception of an occasional sore bottom.  She smiles all
the time.  It does wear me out considerably when I have her all day long
though, and, especially this time, when I was tired from our trip and Eric's
visit.

I must think about a trip to Houston.  Are you aware of the big Houston art
day in the galleries on July 8th?  Just caught a glimpse of it when thumbing
through the new SW Art Mag.  I'll track it down and give you the particulars.
 (You'll have to review your travel schedule with me again.)

Hope you're having a good week.  love, Mum


please correct date.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
12:19 PM ---------------------------
From: Jennifer Fraser on 01/12/2001 11:55 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Traders Roundtable

Is that date right?

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           12/01/2001 11:46

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Traders Roundtable

As mentioned during the fourth quarter, Gary and I would like to begin
regular meetings of our Trader's Roundtable.  The ideas generated from this
group should be longer term trading opportunities for Enron covering the
markets we manage.  In addition, this forum will provide for cross commodity
education, insight into many areas of Enron's businesses, and promote
aggressive ideas.

Each week, we'll summarize commodity trading activity, and provide an open
forum for discussion.  Your input is valuable, and we've limited this group
to our most experienced traders, and would appreciate regular participation.
Our first meeting will be Tuesday, January 9 at 4:00pm in EB3321.

Jeff & Gary


The last slide I'm working on is the "Detail of Market Value" slide.  I have a draft completed, but Steve has not been able to review it.  As long as I can get time with him in the morning and the changes aren't significant I should be able to have the presentation to you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	2002 Presentation

Do you think I can the TW presentation on Wednesday by 12:00?

Thanks

Tracy


I'll need the file -

Susan Flynn
01/19/2000 03:32 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conference Call - Basin Electric Power Cooperative

 Spoke with Bob Hall (business person) at CP.  Set up conference call to
discuss the ISDA Master Agreement on Monday, January 24, 2000 at 1:30 p.m.
Houston time.   Bob Hall will set up the conference call and call Sara.
Bob, his boss, Buzz Hudgins (financial person), and in-house counsel, Russ
Mathers,  will be on the phone.   Bob's telephone number is (701) 223-0441.


Geoff,

To give you a more accurate number of Gas IT reduction, the planned reduction (as of today) is actually 29%, based on the head count we presented to you during our budgeting discussion (45 vs. 32).

Zhiyong


Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


[IMAGE]
 Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details .     Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Joe Horn , WR NO - Addison Red Cornholes Updated 12/21/01 Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.   Maurice Smith , RB ATL - CYSWC Updated 12/21/01 A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Donald Hayes , WR CAR - Water Boys Updated 12/21/01 Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.    Chris Weinke , QB CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.   Kurt Warner , QB STL - Team T-Bone Updated 12/21/01 Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.  Rich Gannon , QB OAK - Dallas Demon Horde Updated 12/21/01 Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.   Randy Moss  , WR MIN - The Replacements Updated 12/21/01 Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.  Marvin Minnis , WR KC - Team T-Bone Updated 12/21/01 Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.   Michael Westbrook , WR WAS - Beer Gut Boys Updated 12/21/01 Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.  Rod Gardner , WR WAS - Water Boys Updated 12/21/01 Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.    Tony Richardson , RB KC - South Park Cows Updated 12/21/01 Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Tony Gonzalez , TE KC - Aryan Brother Inc. Updated 12/21/01 Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.   Brett Favre , QB GB - Water Boys Updated 12/21/01 Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.  Trent Green , QB KC - Barking Spiders Updated 12/21/01 Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.   Bill Schroeder , WR GB - The Replacements Updated 12/21/01 Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.  Matt Hasselbeck , QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.   Johnnie Morton , WR DET - Addison Red Cornholes Updated 12/21/01 Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.  Reggie Wayne , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.   Amani Toomer , WR NYG - Team T-Bone Updated 12/21/01 Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.  Marvin Harrison , WR IND - Lake Austin Mighty Mullets Updated 12/21/01 Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.   Duce Staley , RB PHI - Water Boys Updated 12/21/01 Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.    Shawn Bryson , RB BUF - Lake Austin Mighty Mullets Updated 12/21/01 Bryson will start in place of the injured Travis Henry this week. Consider him as a No. 2 RB if you need help at that spot.   James Thrash , WR PHI - Barking Spiders Updated 12/21/01 Thrash was not very consistent during the regular season and may not catch a lot of TD passes in the final games of the NFL regular season. He will be a No. 2 wideout at best during the Fantasy playoffs.   David Patten , WR NE - High Shrivel Factor Updated 12/21/01 Patten's numbers have dropped off in recent weeks. Don't use him unless your team is very thin at wide receiver.   Joey Galloway , WR DAL - Dallas Demon Horde Updated 12/21/01 Galloway has been a disappointment for Fantasy owners this season. Unless you're in a deeper league, starting Galloway during your playoffs isn't recommended.    Troy Brown , WR NE - Lake Austin Mighty Mullets Updated 12/21/01 Brown has been an inconsistent Fantasy receiver this year. He may not be a reliable option during the Fantasy playoffs.   Warrick Dunn , RB TB - Team T-Bone Updated 12/21/01 Dunn has been inconsistent this season. He will be a No. 2 back at best during your playoffs.   Antowain Smith , RB NE - CYSWC Updated 12/21/01 Smith is a must-start player during the Fantasy postseason. Even if his yardage totals aren't good, he is a tremendous TD threat.   Keyshawn Johnson , WR TB - Money Shots Updated 12/21/01 Johnson has caught a lot of passes this season, but has only one TD reception. Nevertheless, he will still be a reliable receiver in your playoffs.  Anthony Becht , TE NYJ - Dallas Demon Horde Updated 12/21/01 Becht hasn't been a consistent target for the Jets this year. He may not be very valuable during the Fantasy playoffs.   More Updates  Teams, Rosters  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] CYSWC Dutch Quigley    Player TM Pos Status Next Bye Garcia, Jeff  SF QB Active PHI Week 6 Dillon, Corey  CIN RB Active @BAL Week 8 Smith, Antowain  NE RB Active MIA Week 16 Mason, Derrick  TEN WR Active @OAK Week 3 Scott, Darnay  CIN WR Active @BAL Week 8 Freeman, Antonio  GB WR Active CLE Week 7 Lewis, Chad  PHI TE Active @SF Week 5 Nedney, Joe  TEN K Active @OAK Week 3 Raiders  OAK DT Active TEN Week 6 Chandler, Chris  ATL QB Reserve BUF Week 7 Smith, Maurice  ATL RB Reserve BUF Week 7 Redmond, J.R.  NE RB Reserve MIA Week 16 Parker, Larry  KC WR Reserve SD Week 10 Alexander, Derrick  KC WR Reserve SD Week 10 Clark, Desmond  DEN TE Reserve bye Week 15 Vinatieri, Adam  NE K Reserve MIA Week 16 Bills  BUF DT Reserve @ATL Week 5  Total Active Players: 9 Total Reserve Players: 8  NFL Injuries for CYSWC Updated Player Team Pos Injury Expected Return 12/21/01 Dillon, Corey  CIN RB Finger Expected to play Sunday at Bal. 12/20/01 Garcia, Jeff  SF QB Ribs Questionable for Saturday's game vs. Phi. 12/17/01 Lewis, Chad  PHI TE Groin Expected to start 12/19/01 Mason, Derrick  TEN WR Hip Day to day 12/21/01 Parker, Larry  KC WR Shoulder  Not expected to play this week [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Need money for college? Use FastWeb's free scholarship search to
find information on more than 600,000 scholarships!
It's easy and free. We'll match your background against our
database of over 600,000 scholarships! And we'll update you when
new scholarships matching your background are added to our
database. FastWeb is recommended by more than 3,000 colleges and
14,000 high schools. http://www.fastweb.com/ib/dictionary-1f

AOL users click here
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

   Word of the Day for Sunday April 7, 2002:

   exculpate \EK-skuhl-payt; ek-SKUHL-payt\, transitive verb:
   To  clear  from  alleged  fault  or  guilt;  to  prove  to  be
   guiltless; to relieve of blame; to acquit.

     Each  member is determined to exculpate himself, to lay the
     blame elsewhere.
     --Joseph  Wood  Krutch,  "How Will Posterity Rank O'Neill?"
     [1]New York Times, October 21, 1956

     At  the  same  time,  they  said,  representatives  of  the
     inspector  general's  office  at  the  CIA  were  generally
     protective  of  the  intelligence  agents  involved  in the
     matter,  highlighting  evidence  that  seemed  to exculpate
     them.
     --Tim    Golden,    "Guerrilla's   Asylum   Analyzed   Amid
     Contradictory Claims," [2]New York Times, December 12, 1996
     _________________________________________________________

   Exculpate  is  ultimately  derived from Latin ex-, "without" +
   culpare, "to blame," from culpa, "blame, fault."

   Synonyms:   clear,   discharge,  exonerate.  [3]Find  more  at
   Thesaurus.com.

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/
   2. http://www.nytimes.com/
   3. http://www.thesaurus.com/roget/VI/970.html

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


Thanks-- I think!


FYI

Mark, I talked to Fred.. this meetingis cancelled until further notice... and for sure you  and your people were going to be invited.

BT


Michael, here is my third report. The password is green.

The Appendices are also attached and the password for them is grey. tks

Robert


Louise,

Colin came in this morning, spent some time with the Gas team, HR and then with me, and has decided he doesn't want to come back.

He intends to go back to UK in Q2 and intends to chill out untill then, do some travelling etc....

We had a long conversation about this, and it was evident that his mind is pretty much made up.

He was very flattered about being asked to stay on and he wanted me to pass thanks to you for thinking of him, and is sorry to have to let you down by not accepting....

regards

Stephen Stock
Tel : 713-345-8980
Cell : 832-274-0236


As best I can tell it isn't essential; however, it would probably be
helpful.  I know you are on holiday, so if you have something else going on,
I wouldn't worry about it.  I can always call you later.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 03/23/2001 09:25:07 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Revised Exclusivity Letter

I heard about this call yesterday. Am I to participate?

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Why is Milnthorp doing a U.S. school and I thought I was doing MIT


<<2R6KRED.DOC>>  <<2RSWRED.DOC>>

Kay and George:

Enclosed are final drafts of the LLC Agreements marked to reflect revisions
from the drafts circulated January 11, 2001.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6KRED.DOC
 - 2RSWRED.DOC


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear Jason,  I'm Washington Correspondent Peter Cook filling in for Jay Rickerts while he's on vacation this week.     International Correspondent Wolfgang Vale brought us live reports on Tuesday from the 115th OPEC Conference in Vienna, Austria.  Wolfgang had a live interview with OPEC President Chakib Khelil in the 2:00 p.m. ET newscast.  Khelil discussed OPEC production, Western demand, and prices.  If you missed the interview, catch it in its entirety in ENL's Video Library.  We'll have more live coverage on Wednesday, and we're scheduled to have an exclusive interview with OPEC Secretary General Ali Rodriguez.  Log on Wednesday for extensive coverage from Vienna.   The House Energy and Commerce Committee is scheduled to resume its markup of the Electricity Emergency Relief Act Wednesday morning.  Washington Bureau Chief Jay Cranford and I will be following the markup as well as the official power shift expected in the Senate tomorrow.  Also from Washington on Wednesday, Interior Secretary Gale Norton is scheduled to testify before the House Resources Committee to defend the Bush administration's national energy policy.  Norton is expected to discuss access to federal lands for energy exploration with ANWR entering into the discussion.  We'll keep you updated on these and other stories from the Washington bureau on Wednesday.   From the Houston bureau on Wednesday, Correspondent Kim Benestante is scheduled to bring us a report on training programs some companies are implementing to prepare high school and college students for careers in the energy industry.  We're also scheduled to hear from University of Houston professor Michael Economides as he discusses the need to focus on ultra-deepwater drilling and Middle Eastern countries in what he calls the "new frontier."  We'll have all this and more from the Houston bureau on Wednesday.   Also on Wednesday, President and Chairman of Beta Oil and Gas Steve Antry is scheduled to join us in studio.  Beta Oil and Gas expects revenues ranging from $18 million to $22 million this year, with projections based on continued drilling of around  10 new wells a quarter.  Antry will bring us more on Beta Oil and Gas in the 3:00 p.m. ET newscast on Wednesday.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.   Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Peter Cook, EnergyNewsLive.com Washington Correspondent  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mallory, Donald" <Donald_Mallory@PLATTS.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	PMRM1101P@LISTSERV.FTENERGY.COM
Subject:	Power Market Risk Management: A Survival Guide - Order today for              only $325

 [IMAGE]

                                                                            	 Brought  to you by Platts (a division of  McGraw-Hill)  Order by  November 30, 2001 and Save!   Call 800-424-2908 today to  order your own Survival Guide   By the time you finish  reading this management report, you'll have gained a working understanding  of power market risk-management concepts and practices.   Risk management is a  structured discipline that uses well-defined policies and procedures to  mitigate a company's credit, market, or operational risks. It's a way of  looking at an unstable factor, such as fluctuating fuel prices, and  finding ways to offset the risk of that instability. Our Survival Guide  will give you the tools you need to make risk management an integral part  of your power market business. You'll discover:   [IMAGE]       How to protect revenue  streams for the future.               [IMAGE]       What market leaders,  such as Koch Energy Trading and Enron, are  doing.               [IMAGE]       Ways to incorporate  risk-management operations into your business  strategy.               [IMAGE]       How to better evaluate  and manage consultants' risk-management services, such as those  offered by Risk Advisory or SAVA Risk  Management.               [IMAGE]       Workable strategies  for monitoring and assessing risk-management operations.     To corporate energy  managers, risk management may mean understanding the risks and variable  value of different commodities. Power market players need to run their  plants and structure contracts to ensure that they'll be able to service  debt and achieve a solid return. As new entrants join the power market,  bringing risk-management experience from other sectors, existing players  need to get up to speed quickly. The Survival Guide supplies exactly what  information these professionals need to get started.  "Power Market Risk  Management: A Survival Guide" focuses exclusively on risk management for  power markets.  Risk management isn't  gambling-it's business sense!  Multiple-Copy  Savings if ordered by November 30, 2001! 2 copies Save 5% 3 copies  Save 10% 4+ copies Save 20%  Reference  priority code 820to  receive this special discounted offer.   Order  your Survival Guide today for only $325  Tel  800-424-2908 (toll free); 720-548-5700 (direct) E-mail  custserv@ftenergy.com  If you wish to unsubscribe  from ALL Platts promotions, click  here .     Priority Code  820


See responses below.  Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Brent

	David Forster
	09/19/2000 04:53 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Bermuda Approval

Do you mean we are now approved to use the North American forms of the
Electronic Trading Agreement and the Password Application for companies
located in Bermuda? Yes

Does this approval apply to financial products only?  At this time, yes.

Are there any other restrictions?  No.

Thanks,

Dave

	Brent Hendry
	09/19/2000 11:48 AM

		 To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bermuda Approval

Bermuda has been approved as a jurisdiction for all financial products using
the ENA format of GTC with New York Law.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

FYI.

TJ and Claudette--Please forward to your groups.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

 General Observations

 The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

 FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
01:50 PM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
09/13/2000 12:33 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Hadix/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter 1550

Per Gas Control, this will be down until the 18th.


Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The ISO has posted the CPUC subpoena on its website at
http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/07/26/2000072610262610454.pdf
<http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/07/26/2000072610262610454.pdf>   As stated
in a message forwarded yesterday to market participants and scheduling
coordinators, the CPUC has agreed to extend the deadline for a reply to
Friday July 28, although the ISO has been informed today that the extension
is only until NOON on Friday.  In addition, the ISO discussed the reference
to an affidavit in the subpoena with the CPUC and was informed that this
results from a typo which will be corrected in a corrected document sent by
federal express to the ISO yesterday (the words attached affidavit will be
replaced with the word attachments).  The ISO has accepted federal express
service of the subpoena.

The ISO has raised confidentiality concerns with the CPUC and the CPUC
agreed to circulate a draft of a confidentiality agreement to the ISO today.
The ISO will forward the draft to market participants and scheduling
coordinators as soon as we receive it.  Once again the ISO reiterates to
market participants that to the extent they have outstanding issues as to
the subpoena, these should be raised directly with the appropriate entity.
The ISO intends to comply with the subpoena on Friday unless it receives a
legally sufficient communication to the contrary from the CPUC or a court.

Finally, a few market participants have requested that the ISO make
available several letters forwarded to the EOB discussing confidential
treatment.  These letters are attached.

Questions should be directed to Jeanne M. Sol, at 916-608-7144.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - 7-24DRAFT LETTER TO EOB FROM ISO_1.doc
 - 7-25eobsubOFFER.doc


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  JobsOnline is giving away $10,000 instant cash!
		JobsOnline is one of the Internet's leading sites for employment information
and career resources. Search their extensive database of over 200,000 job
postings to make your next career move. And use the site,s valuable career
resources to assist you in your job search ) or to succeed in your current
position. Click  here for more details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Monday December 4, 2000

		Jeremiah 33.14

		The Access Bible, NRSV, Old Testament, Page 1016

		"The days are surely coming, says the LORD, when I will fulfill the promise I
made to the house of Israel and the house of Judah."

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
eGreetings! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		 Holiday gift shopping made easy...
		It's Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		   Want Coupons, FREESTUFF, & More? Click Into CoolSavings
		CoolSavings is the place to save BIG on all your favorite things from all
your favorite stores and online retailers this Holiday season.

		   Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Iyanla Vanzant: In the Meantime

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Left Behind

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Olaf Olafsson: The Journey Home

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Enya: A Day Without Rain

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		Nintendo: Hey You, Pikachu!

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		George Clooney: The Perfect Storm

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		Fantasia 2000

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow.
		- Plato

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  Does "email program" mean "geek Greek" to you?
		Don't let email confuse you! Get FREE Outlook 2000 tips from EMAZING. Soon
you'll be setting up folders, sending tricky attachments, customizing your
views, and scheduling appointments. It's as easy as 1-2-3 with these tips!
Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


Yes.  Thank you.


I am so glad that you will be able to interview.  I will look forward to
seeing you in Austin on Wednesday.  --Sally

Loftus Fitzwater@ENRON
03/23/2001 08:37 AM
To: Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Excellence Scholarship

Sally & Karen:

I will be able to make it on Wednesday and look forward to the trip.  It will
be great to be involved on the other side of the table.  I have made flight
arrangements and will see you on Wednesday.

Karen - my location is 3137a if you have any material to deliver.

Fitz


Guys, attached you will find a completed 2001 Pro Forma budget needing Lavo's
review and then detailed review with each team.

This workbook has a number of worksheets including:
 a) pkrs o&m - this details the o&m costs for the sold peakers assuming we
own throught Q2 - charged to the OOC;
 b) driftPrepay - shows the detail as provided netting drift and pre-pay
expenses - not all that relevant if you assume that increasing drift will be
offset by larger monetizations;
 c) Summary - overall completed income statement - note that non-external
capital charges are added back to reach EBIT;
 d) commercial income - guts of the commercial budget;
 e) group expenses - shows the detail on ENA net groups expenses, EIS/ENW/IT
non-allocable, corporate charges not allocated to specific commercial groups
and bonus/other comp;
 f) HP&L - takes a cut at HP&L income statement and balance sheet in 2001
assuming a sale by the end of Q2 - this needs some sit down work with Redmond;
 g) Balance Sheet Allocations - this defines by group the capital employed,
assets to be sold and new capital expenditures expected in 2001 - then
calculates a net capital and depreciation charge;
 h) Balance Sheet - this defines the existing balance sheet with no
anticipated sales or increases by vehicle (ie) Enserco, JEDI, etc - merchant
investments are charged @ a blended rate of 15% and strategic investments are
charged @ a blended rate of 9%.

Two action items:
 a) Print out for John - Commercial Income  & Summary worksheets for his
comment and review &
 b) Start putting completed commercial packages together for
distribution/further comment by the business units in the next couple of
weeks - include detailed income statement, headcount, balance sheet
(including expected increases,decreases, capital charge and depreciation),
leave pages open for goals & objectives and target customer list.  I would
like to review format and detail for each group before distribution.

Regards
Delainey


Wasn't this the reason why we included it?.....I think it is clear
now...please let me know
Thanks
Carlos
---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

Robert B Cass@ECT
11/08/2000 10:35 AM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: New Product Type: US Pipeline Capacity Release

I believe that it would be Legal's position that we not ignore the reference
to the "General Terms and Conditions" since it serves as additional terms to
the "special terms" of the transaction.  GTC's allow for resolution of
payment failure, force majeure, liability, etc.  To include it in the
description guarantees that those terms are included.  Without the inclusion,
the product description would have to be expanded to include many (if not
all) of the terms contained in the GTC.

Eventhough the transaction may not be "confirmed," the Counterparty may elect
to request the GTC at any time.  Reason?  The GTC resolves potential
conflicts and defines the rights of the parties.  The counterparty may not
necessarily require a confirmation.

Ultimately, Legal will need to approve the action if the GTC is removed from
the product description, but I would be interested to know on what basis they
would allow the GTC to be dropped from the description.  These are my
thoughts (recommendations?).

- Rob

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                11/08/2000 08:35 AM

To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Product Type: US Pipeline Capacity Release

fyi
Dale/Rob
Were are your thoughts on the GTC question?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
11/08/2000 08:34 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Mills                           11/08/2000 12:56 AM

To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ
Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: New Product Type: US Pipeline Capacity Release

The product description specifically designates a GTC -if we are not
confirming the transactions should we make this reference?  Other than that,
it seems ok.  For those that have not been involved in the discussions, this
type of transaction will not bridge automatically from EOL to Sitara.  It
will have to be monitored and entered manually.  Since this will be a
capacity release deal, the pipeline contract number that we a releasing will
be a crucial piece of information when entering the transport capacity deal.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 12:43
AM ---------------------------

From:  Carlos Alatorre @ ENRON
             11/07/2000 07:18 PM

To: Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Product Type: US Pipeline Capacity Release

A new Product Type has been created for US Gas Capacity Release (US Pipeline
Capacity Release).
We will certainly appreciate your approval so we can move forward and have
everything ready for launching on Wednesday Nov. 15th.
Below you can see an example of the Prod. Description in case you can not see
the complete text on Datamanager.
If you have any questions or comments please let me know.
Thanks
Carlos
X5-8705


I am getting ready to send Michelle Blaine a question regarding some proposed
gifts that Mat Gimble and crew want to give the "new" Seminole Indian Chief.
Would you rather the question be sent by you?  If so, let me know and I will
explain, otherwise I will just copy you on the e-mail.

K-

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


This was the response I received from the Ford Career Center regarding
internship interviews.

Thank you,

Lexi

---------------------- Forwarded by Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------

"Cindy Henson" <Cindy.Henson@bus.utexas.edu> on 02/05/2001 03:02:03 PM
To: <Lexi.Elliott@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Fall Interviews

Lexi:

All of the companies that you mentioned interview for internships during
Spring (February) recruiting.  Fall is primarily when these companies
come for full time recruiting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lexi.Elliott@enron.com [mailto:Lexi.Elliott@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 2:56 PM
To: ljames@mail.utexas.edu; hensonc@mail.utexas.edu
Cc: Richard.Causey@enron.com; Mark.E.Lindsey@enron.com;
Shelly.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Fall Interviews

Lynett and Cindy:

Greetings from Houston!

I have a special request for you.  In order for us to prepare our campus
recruiting strategy for next fall, I need information regarding
internship
recruiting.

As you know, we decided to concentrate our spring 2001 effort on intern
recruiting and interviewing.  In order for us to ensure that we are
being
effective with this strategy, I need to know which companies interviewed
for summer interns during the fall 2000 recruiting season.  Companies of
particular interest would be El Paso, Williams, Dynegy, Duke, consulting
firms such as McKinsey, and Big 5 accounting firms.

By providing this information, you would greatly assist our effort for
upcoming years.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Lexi Elliott
713/853-4585


Thane's 3 year old daughter is now in a body cast for 6 weeks, but the wonderful news is that the problem was a non-malignant cyst that weakened her leg causing the break.  The doctor told them that having her break it naturally is actually better than the planned surgury that was going to drain it because the leg will be stronger.


Attached is the revised AOI reflecting comments from AES' counsel.

Closing Agenda for Friday 5/11/2001

-10am --wire in the amount of $1mm to be initiated by AES
-Upon Wire Confirmation--ENA delivers to AES the following executed docs via
Fax:
1.  Am. 4 to PDA;
2.  Am.2 to SPA;
3.  Assignment of Interest in Haywood Power I, LLC; and
4.  Representations Certificate

-Upon Wire Confirmation--AESdelivers to ENA the following executed docs via
Fax:
1.  Am. 4 to PDA;
2.  Am. 2 to SPA;
3.  Assignment of Interest in Haywood Power I, LLC;
4.  Representations Certificate;
5.  Commitment Letter; and
6.  Waiver of Termination Option

--Both Parties will overnight 1 copy of each agreement/letter to the other's
counsel for Saturday delivery.  Additionally, in the same package ENA will
include  the LLC Binder for Haywood Power I, LLC and appropriate termination
letters of the company's officers.

Please feel free to call me with questions or comments.  Best regards.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

 - #1287349 v4 - ASSIGNMENT OF INTERESTS.doc


Jeff, I'm sorry my parents did that last night.  I will ask them not to do
that again.  And I am not upset about us not getting married or moving in
together.  I would like for our relationship to evolve and grow into
something like that.  All I was saying is that we have a communication
problem if you think we've talked about it and I don't think we have.  If I
ever thought you wanted me to move in with you, I would have done it.  That
has nothing to do with selling my house.  But I'm not upset about it either.
You seem to be putting a lot of words in my mouth in this email about what I
want that I'm not telling you about and none of it is true.

But most importantly, I was NOT calling you a liar or an asshole.  When I
said honest, I was talking about being straightforward and communicating in
a way that doesn't make me have to guess what you're really saying.  It had
nothing to do with lying and I never accused you of lying.  I hope you
understand that.  And I certainly never EVER called you an asshole last
night.  Jeff, I really don't think this has to be an argument.  But it's
very sad to me that you don't think we care enough about each other to be
committed to this relationship.  That's a pretty serious blow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 9:17 AM
To: Prentice Sellers
Subject: Re: I'm sorry

Prentice:
I'm happy to talk.  However, if you're unhappy because 1) I haven't asked
you to marry me, or 2) I haven't asked you to move in together, or 3) I
haven't asked you to have children, then you need to say so.  I'm very
upset to think that the only time I hear what you feel, or what your mother
believes you feel, or what your father believes you feel, is when we're
having dinner with your parents and they impose their limited view of our
relationship on the situation.  I'm not interested in debating my personal
relationship with you with your parents as a substitute for our
communicating---that's not a relationship.  Nor am I interested in living
my life according to what your parents or my parents or anyone else's
parents wish they'd done.  If I had ever had someone call you the way
Cameron called me on Saturday night, you would have screamed at me for
days.  Yet, when it's the other way, there's always a difference, always a
reason.  It seems like rather than communicate we are continually engaged
in a rhetorical exercise.  It 's very upsetting, and it's the sort of
one-way street that has me so deeply depressed about how we interact.

If you feel that I'm dishonest, or too dominant or not committed to the
relationship, then you need to say so---I shouldn't have to hear it in
vague terms from your parents over dinner.  And if you want to move in
together, or get married, or have children, then perhaps it would be
constructive for you to say so, and offer ways in which we would make that
happen.  From my perspective, all you've ever considered is 1) not selling
your house---for a variety of reasons that I don't understand or 2) buying
another place with Cameron.  But I'm not dating you and your sister, I'm
dating you.  So it seems to me that if you were committed to it, you would
search a solution.  Instead, it seems to me, none of those things occur,
but I'm an asshole for not having moved in with you, or married you or had
children with you.  That's lose-lose and everyone can call me an asshole,
but it won't change things.

It seems to me that two things have to happen for people to make a
commitment.  First, they have to care for each other, and the way we
interact, it's hard to say objectively that we pass that hurdle.  You have
frequently asked your parents to stop arguing, that it upsets you too much,
but that's what we spend most of our time doing.  Second, each person has
to be emotionally mature enough to undertake the responsibilities that come
with the commitment.  I've always wanted to be your partner, not your older
brother, and not your father.  I want an equal partnership where both
individuals are pouring into the relationship, even when it's difficult,
even when it's inconvenient.   If you're looking for a different dynamic in
a relationship, then we need to get it clear.  I don't think we pass these
two hurdles and so I don't think we're quite ready for the commitment,
though I've been working hard at trying to get there, and think we could.
But if we're not ready, I'm not going to do it to please your parents or my
parents or anyone else.

We can talk all day long about what an asshole I am, but I'm not willing to
do that anymore.  And if that's a requirement, then I will fail and we
shouldn't waste our time.  It takes two, pure and simple.  I'm very sorry
that work is overwhelming right now and that I go to school and am in the
process of fulfilling something I've always wanted to do--have property on
the coast.  If you feel that we can't have the relationship you want or
need because of my schedule, then you need to tell me.

If you want to talk about these issues, that's great, but I just feel that
"you never said this,"  and "no, this is what I said," and all the spinning
and debating is a diversion that doesn't get to the real issues.   I was
very upset that after the conversation we had with your parents, which I am
very unhappy about, you call to me I lied  about something.  After this
long, if you want to discuss my dishonesty, then I think we need to take a
hard look at why we're in this at all.  So I'm happy to talk, but not on
the phone, and not about who's the bigger asshole, or who's a lying
son-of-a-bitch.


Jeff,

This is the info that I referenced on my voice-mail.  Please call me after
you have had a chance to review it.  Thanks.

Regards,

Lara

FTC Requests Comments on Retail Electricity Competition Plans

The Federal Trade Commission today announced that it is seeking information
regarding the results to date of different regulatory approaches to the
introduction of competition into the retail sale of electricity. The
Commission has approved a Federal Register notice, to be published shortly,
that contains a series of questions designed to help gather this information.
The Commission will produce a report that discusses the advantages and
disadvantages associated with different approaches to particular issues and
that identifies, if warranted, areas in which additional federal legislative
or regulatory action may be desirable.

As detailed in the notice, many states have enacted, and in some cases begun
to implement, legislation designed to introduce competition into the retail
sale of electricity to encourage lower prices, better service and greater
innovation. To date, 24 states and the District of Columbia have set dates
when customers will be allowed to choose their electric power supplier.
Recently, however, substantial price increases and reliability problems in
some areas undergoing this transition have raised questions about the best
way this restructuring can be designed to benefit retail customers. In light
of recent price increases and reliability problems in California and western
states generally, some states have delayed, or are considering delaying,
implementation of retail competition plans.

The Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee of the United States House
of Representatives, W.J. "Billy" Tauzin, and the Chairman of the Subcommittee
on Energy and Air Quality, Joe Barton, have requested that the Commission
examine various state retail competition programs and describe those features
that appear to have resulted in consumer benefits and those that have not
yielded consumer benefits. In addition, the Commission has been asked to
examine possible jurisdictional limitations on the states' authority to
design successful retail competition plans and whether there is a need for
federal legislative or regulatory action. To comply with this request, the
Commission will update its July 2000 staff report "Competition and Consumer
Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform."

For the updated report, the Commission proposes to examine state plans that
allow customers to choose their generation supplier, and state plans with
unique approaches to retail electricity competition. The Commission will work
with the states to understand the various features of the plans and to gather
facts relevant to understanding the market reaction to a particular state's
plan.

The Federal Register notice contains additional questions about which the
Commission seeks public comment. The Commission seeks comments on features of
state retail competition plans that have benefitted consumers and those that
have not. The Commission is particularly interested in receiving information
about the market response to various provisions of state retail competition
plans. It is not necessary to respond to each question for every state.

Written comments in response to the questions in the Federal Register notice
are due by April 3, 2001 and will become part of the public record. They may
be submitted to: Donald S. Clark, Office of the Secretary, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. Submissions
should be captioned: "V010003 -- Comments Regarding Retail Energy
Competition." Electronic submissions may be sent by e-mail to:
"retailelectricity@ftc.gov" and may also be sent on floppy disk, as described
in the notice.

The Commission vote to publish the Federal Register notice was 5-0.

This is the FR Notice text from the FTC web site at
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2001/02/eleccompetition.htm:


I didn't think you were being difficult.

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/06/2001 09:09:45 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Clarksdale

I'm not trying to be difficult, just didn't understand. I'll call you between
10 and 12:30 to give you an update and verify that I'm proceeding on the
right track.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/06/01 08:24AM >>>

Yes,which is what prompted my email this am. I'm looking for a way to
simplify the process since closing is less than a week away.

I'm in 825-925; 1000-1230 today.

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/06/2001 08:15:08 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Clarksdale

Did you get my email yesterday asking for a time to have a call with Rod
and me?

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/06/01 08:09AM >>>

Wilson,

We are running short on time.  We are planning to sign on  Tuesday, and I
hesitate to put a new document in front of them at this late date. Would it
be easier to work with reps/warranties?

I definitely need an answer from your firm confirming (1) enforceability
(2) obligation of the Cities to financially support agreement.

Also, could you provide me with the Mississippi law defn of consequential
damages and a couple of examples where Enron could be responsible for same
under this agreement?  Also, can MDEA and the Cities be liableto Enron for
consequentials (absent a waiver)?

Your comments to the previously forwarded draft would be greatly
appreciated.

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/05/2001 10:33:14 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Clarksdale

I had spoken to Rod Clement, one of our opinions guys, about having a call
with you, but we hadn't gotten around to scheduling it. What is your
availability this afternoon? Both Rod and I are available.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/05/01 06:25AM >>>
Wilson,

We are trying to finalize this transaction by next Tuesday, and I could
really use your help.  I believe you owe me a draft of an opinion letter?
Also, do you have any comments to the draft agreement I sent out last week?

I also need an opinion that the language in the agreement re the Cities
obligation to financially support MDEA is sufficient.

Thank you,

Kay


Not sure?


John:

Many thanks for your reply.

I hope that Thursday 9:00am your time is fine with you.  An alternative would
be by Friday 9:00.  Please confirm as per your time table; I shall initiate
the call.

On the same wave length, Rick and I are trying to meet in the coming 48 hours
with Wade who is in Houston.  Rick intends to discuss the GA support needs
under the two scenarios of arbitration and renegotiation.

Best regards

AI
713-853-3037

	John Hardy
	06/26/2001 12:14 PM

		 To: Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Government Affairs Strategy for Dahbol - Two

Amr
 Lets talk at your convenience.  the needed action items for India go well
beyond the regulatory.  Jane was diverted from that sort of activity by the
security issue, but lets discuss to see what might be done.  thanks John

	Amr Ibrahim
	06/25/2001 06:22 PM

		 To: John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Government Affairs Strategy for Dahbol - Two

Colleagues:

I am currently in Houston.  I wonder if we can have a conference call to
discuss your advise for the needed action items for India, if any.  I hope
that a call this Thursday is possible.  Kindly advise.

Best regards

AI
7130-839-3037
----- Forwarded by Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/25/2001 05:13 PM -----

	Amr Ibrahim
	06/14/2001 04:50 AM

		 To: John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Government Affairs Strategy for Dahbol

Colleagues:

I am sure that you are aware that Jane Wilson is leaving Enron (and India)
very shortly.  I am currently working on determining the Government and
Regulatory Affairs needs in India for the coming 6 months.  I would benefit
very much from a conference call to: a) discuss the strategy you prepared for
Dahbol,  and b) assess what a GA/Regulatory team here on the ground can help
you in implementing your strategy.

I would appreciate very much an electronic copy of the strategy to prepare
for the conference call, and your suggestion for its  time.  In this context,
may I suggest Monday 18th at 10:45 Washington Time?

I look forward for your comments and advise.

Best regards

AI
Bombay
9198200-88643, or email


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Greg Napiorkowski <gnapiorkowski@intertrust.com> on 02/05/2001 12:35:21 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Czesc

Wicku,

Oczywiscie, ze sie spotkam z radoscia i przyjemnoscia.
Sporo czasu minelo od czsu, gdy sie ostatni raz widzielismy.

W gre wchodzi praktycznie czwartek wieczorem.  W srode sie przeprowadzam,
a w piatek lece do NJ o 21:30.

Moj telefon:  408-855-0263.

Na razie,

  Grzegorz

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:29 AM
To: gnapi@intertrust.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Czesc

Grzegorz,

Ludmila doniosla mi, ze pracujesz w Kalifornii.

Bede w Berkeley w srode i w Palo Alto w czwartek i piatek.

Czy masz czas, by spotakc sie na obiad/lunch/kawe?

Pozdrowienia

Wicek


David

I read this article and it looks ok to me - can you also read it (for legal issues and general correct information to the extent you know but not grammer, good writing...) and let me know if you see anything, Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Grabstald, Kathie
Sent: Mon 9/24/2001 5:02 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Cc:
Subject: Exchange Magazine

Elizabeth-

I am one of the editors for the Exchange Newsmagazine (the EWS external customer publication).  It is approval time and Legal needs to sign off on this article on Renewables.  The people quoted here have made their corrections. If you are not the appropriate person to read and approve this, please direct me to the right one.  I need this back by Friday, Sept. 28, if possible.

Thank you.

Kathie Grabstald
Enron Public Relations
713-853-9610

<<Exch.Green Tag.Renewables.doc>>


Jim,

Thanks for your assistance.  As we discussed, all we need is our engineering
department to sign off on LCRA's measurement specs which are attached below
in Exhibit "B".  I spoke withTom Fry today and he suggested that Sam Shaw at
Hanover is the one to review the specs and make sure they match ours.  Please
contact me as soon as possible once we have confirmation on the specs.  LCRA
is eager to sign as they are quickly approaching their commencement of
construction date.  The documents are ready for execution as soon as we get a
"go-ahead" on the measurement specs.  Thanks Again.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 11:07 AM -----

	Eric Gillaspie
	05/25/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: dan.kruger@lcra.org
		 cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald
Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Interconnect Agreement - Ferguson Pipeline

Mr. Kruger,

Again, it was a pleasure speaking with you today.  Please find the attached
red-line versions of the LCRA -HPL Interconnect Agreement & Exhibit B with
the changes as discussed.  As soon as I get confirmation from our Engineering
Department that your measurement specifications are acceptable,  I will
forward execution copies to your attention.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000
11:35 AM ---------------------------
To: <Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com>
cc: <James.R.Haden@enron.com>, <Steve.HPL.Schneider@enron.com>
Subject: Interconnect Agreement - Ferguson Pipeline

I like the Interconnect Agreement that you sent.  I have just a few
modifications.  I also included a mesurement and quality Exhibit B which I
think we should incorporate.  You may have some suggested changes in regard
to Exhibit B.

On another matter, I need a good faith cost estimate from Enron for
constructing the Tap Facilities.  I need this in order to issue a purchase
order.

Please review and get back with me, Thanks!

 - Enron-LCRA InterAgree 1.2.doc
 - ExhibitB-interconnect.doc


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 11:01 AM -----

	Randal Maffett
	08/11/2000 02:28 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yesterday's discussion

Read JB's response to my phone call below.  I'm not sure what's going on but
if you read the info I had sent to you (via intercompany mail), there are a
number of questions which are relevant:

Why does M. Panelo's e-mail reference JB's ownership being 33%?
Why is JB's signature on the MOU Amendment?  What is his authority as a
signatory?  If he's not an officer of this "Ecogas S.A." then why is his
signature evidenced?

We're trying to track down the faxes he referenced below.  Once received,
I'll forward them if they're pertinent.

RTM

---------------------- Forwarded by Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Jerrel Branson <jerrel@ecogas.com> on 08/11/2000 12:03:41 PM
To: "'Randal.Maffett@enron.com'" <Randal.Maffett@enron.com>
cc: "'rstephens@bracepatt.com'" <rstephens@bracepatt.com>,
"'spieringer@lockeliddell.com'" <spieringer@lockeliddell.com>
Subject: Yesterday's discussion

Randy,

I am concerned about our conversation of yesterday morning.  I sent by fax
to you all relevant documents I have concerning any South American details
which have Ecogas involvement.  As stated over the phone and set out in the
documents, I have never had any ownership interest in any corporation,
partnership, joint-venture, etc. for South America relating to Ecogas.  The
documents which you suggest you have cannot represent any such interest as
it does not and never has existed.  I simply would not act in that manner
and would have expected you to hold that understanding.

Given the status of Ecogas' operations currently I want to suggest that we
all direct our total efforts to resolution of that crisis, rather than
continuing personal distractions and devisiveness.

Regards,

Jerrel


> >
> > >  Get this guy a truck...and a brain....
> >
> >
> >


We have delivered a copy of 2 LNG contracts to Scott Earnest's office
tonight. One is between Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Limited & Dabhol
Power Company and the other is between Dabhol Power Company and Oman LNG
L.L.C.   I understand the EGEP Legal group (Steve Watson) is currently
working on a third contract but it is not executed at this time. He has
advised that he will forward a copy when it is completed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 08:21
PM ---------------------------

Connie Sutton
06/13/2000 05:39 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

I will let you know when I hear something regarding these type of contracts.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 05:38
PM ---------------------------

Bridgette Anderson @ ENRON

06/13/2000 03:20 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

---------------------- Forwarded by Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron on
06/13/2000 04:15 PM ---------------------------

	Rob Walls @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

	06/13/2000 02:22:03 PM

To: Sandeep Katwala, Bridgette Anderson@ENRON, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Bridgette -

By copy of this message, I have asked Sandeep Katwala (acting general counsel
for Enron India) to help locate these contracts for you.  Let me know if you
need anything else.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/13/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------

Bridgette Anderson @ ENRON

06/13/2000 02:19 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Gentlemen,

I was told that both of you worked on the Dabhol project, so I am hoping that
you can assist me.  As the message below states, I am trying to find
contracts that are related to this project.  Please see below for details.
If it was a mistake to send this message to you, please forward to the
correct individual.

Thank you,
Bridgette
---------------------- Forwarded by Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron on
06/13/2000 02:57 PM ---------------------------

Connie Sutton@ECT
06/12/2000 04:18 PM
To: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Can you try to locate a copy of this contract for me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 04:17
PM ---------------------------

Mary Solmonson
06/08/2000 05:05 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Sally and Scott Earnest called this afternoon.  We will be setting up a new
risk book to manage LNG positions on a worldwide basis.  Supposedly, there
are several contracts from the old E.I. entity related to India for LNG.
They may reference Dabhol Power project, fuel management, fuel oil, heating
oil....

Scott desperately needs to get copies of these contracts.  Can you ask around
with some of the contacts you made on your India trip to see if you can find
these and get copies ?


pi phi chick from baylor


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Hai
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Options Market Update
Importance:	High

T.J.,

Please forward the attached Option Market Update to traders and mid-marketers.  Thanks!

Hai


Julia - as promised
avr

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 03:27
PM ---------------------------

Andrea V Reed
08/14/2000 09:45 AM
To: Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Jean
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Raptor List 'j"


Hi Tana,

For our ISDA with the above referenced counterparty, can you tell me
if we (ENA) are supposed to be the confirming party or is it Soc Gen?

They've been sending us a lot of their confirms lately (in the Emerging
Products world, that is....Weather transactions) and are expecting us
to sign their confirms.   I'd like to confirm that our ISDA says We confirm
before I go back to them.

Thanks,
Diane


What is the status of Coral Energy Canada Inc. and Enserch Energy Canada LP?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001
01:07 PM ---------------------------

"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> on 04/27/2001 11:59:30 AM
To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>,
<jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: California Order Proxy Price Calculation

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: April 27, 2001

RE: California Order Proxy Price Calculation

We have had an initial opportunity to review FERC's Order Establishing
Prospective Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the California Wholesale
Electric Markets and Establishing an Investigation of Public Utility Rates in
Wholesale Western Energy Markets, and will provide a more detailed summary
early next week.

However, questions have arisen as to the calculation of the proxy price when
a stage 1, 2 or 3 emergency is called.  In initial discussions with FERC
staff, we have determined that the price mitigation will work as follows:

For the following day, the ISO will publish at 8 a.m. an average of the daily
prices published in Gas Daily for all California delivery points, as well as
emissions costs.  The emissions costs will be calculated by the ISO using the
Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage Service.  The marginal unit will
then be determined via the single price auction in the hour, and the ISO will
then take the previously submitted and confidential heat rate data and
multiply it by the posted average gas price and emissions costs for that hour
to determine the market clearing price.  The ISO will not be calculating an
estimated market-clearing price in advance.


Southwest Airlines' Click 'n Save? E-mail Update
December 11, 2001

Holidays...

A time to remember
A time to share
A time to laugh
A time to care

Visit your family and friends this holiday season with a special offer
from Southwest Airlines. Take advantage of the southwest.com Holiday
specials today.

*****************Important Travel Information*******************

For updated travel information including important
information on wrapped packages please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

**************This week's specials include:*********************

1. southwest.com Specials for purchase through December 27, 2001
   **$39-99 one-way Systemwide* Specials
   **$30 one-way Midwest Specials
   **$30 one-way within the state of California
   **$30 one-way for Southern California, Las Vegas NV and
     Phoenix, AZ
2. southwest.com Specials for purchase through December 13, 2001
   **$30-60 one-way within the state of Texas
   **southwest.com Featured Destination:
     Fort Lauderdale, Florida
3. southwest.com Hotel Specials
4. Southwest Airlines Vacations offer
5. Subscriber Information

***********************Systemwide* Specials**********************

**$39 - $99 one-way for travel Tuesday, Wednesday, and
  Saturday.

**$44 - $119 one-way for travel on Monday,
  Thursday, Friday, and Sunday.

Travel on all published, scheduled service.

For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml#swide?src=e1211

*Orange County, CA and Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 are not included in this sale

**********************Midwest Specials*************************

Travel within the Midwest for only $30 one-way.

For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml#mwest?src=e1211

******************Intra-California Specials*********************

Travel within the state of California for only $30 one-way.
For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml#calif?src=e1211

**********Southern California, Las Vegas and Phoenix************

Southern California, Las Vegas, NV, and
Phoenix, AZ  for $30 one-way.
For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml#socal?src=e1211

************************Texas Specials**************************

Travel for the holidays within the state of Texas for
$30 - $60 one-way!
For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml#texas?src=e1211

Texas Holiday Specials available for purchase through
December 13, 2001, midnight Pacific time, for travel
December 20, 2001 through January 2, 2002.

****************southwest.com Featured Destination**********

This week's Featured Destination:
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Sponsored by Greater Fort Lauderdale Convention and
Visitors Bureau.

This week features air fare specials plus great deals on
hotels and rental cars.

For information on this destination, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/fll_index.shtml?src=e1211

Featured Destination available for purchase through
December 13, 2001, midnight Pacific Time, for travel through
June 7, 2002.

**************Important Details For All Specials************

*Available only on southwest.com.
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Travel any day of the week
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel December 11, 2001 through end of schedule,
 except January 1, March 24, and 27, 2002.
*Purchase through December 27, 2001,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Texas Holiday Specials available for purchase through
 December 13, 2001, midnight Pacific time, for travel
 December 20, 2001 through January 2, 2002.
*Featured Destination available for purchase through
 December 13, 2001, midnight Pacific Time, for travel through
 June 7, 2002.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e1211

**************** Additional Information section *****************

Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 (e.g., travel voucher, gift certificate, discount coupon)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Christmas, New Years,
 Presidents Day, and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

**************** southwest.com Hotel Specials *******************

Go where you want to go.
Pay less to stay there.

Introducing Get Going RatesSM, special pricing from eight hotel
brands with thousands of friendly places to stay all across North
America. Book your room now. And get going while the staying is
good.

For additional information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_hotels.html?src=e1211

*********************Southwest Airlines Vacations******************

Southwest Airlines Vacations is giving you a better way to ski with
your friends this season. You and your Friend book a complete ski
vacation package to Utah, New Mexico, Lake Tahoe, or Durango, CO by
December 20, 2001, and your Friend flies free.

For more details visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_other.html?src=e1211

******************** Subscriber Information ***********************

Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration on your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

******************************************************************

You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/flifo/

******************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: dperlin@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2001 08:54
PM ---------------------------

Jennifer Burns

01/12/2001 12:46 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DATE FOR THE 1ST MEETING IS JANUARY 16

As mentioned during the fourth quarter, Gary and I would like to begin
regular meetings of our Trader's Roundtable.  The ideas generated from this
group should be longer term trading opportunities for Enron covering the
markets we manage.  In addition, this forum will provide for cross commodity
education, insight into many areas of Enron's businesses, and promote
aggressive ideas.

Each week, we'll summarize commodity trading activity, and provide an open
forum for discussion.  Your input is valuable, and we've limited this group
to our most experienced traders, and would appreciate regular participation.
Our first meeting will be Tuesday, January 16 at 4:00pm in EB3321.


Hey, no wriggling out of it!

:)

You're the teacher - what's with this delegation to others?

Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Forster, Avril
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Forster, David
Subject: FW: Options Sessions begin today

-----Original Message-----
From: Mack, Iris
Sent: Mon 19/11/2001 07:42
To: Chen, Hai; Arora, Harry; Gualy, Jaime; Wang, Steve; Stalford, Robert
Cc: Forster, Avril; Presto, Kevin M.; Shoemake, Lisa; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Black, Tamara Jae
Subject: FW: Options Sessions begin today

Hi,

        FYI, the options sessions for the originators begin today.

        The location for the first session is ECS05990.

        Once we get past the basics of options, then the plan is to focus on more advanced topics - exotic options, load following, cross-commodity structures, etc.

        Perhaps during these more advanced sessions some of you guys would like to make presentations.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Forster, David
Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:01 AM
To:     Mack, Iris
Subject:        RE: Options Session

There seems to be quite a bit of interest. You might have a pretty full house.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Mack, Iris
Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:34 AM
To:     Forster, David
Subject:        RE: Options Session

Thanks Dave.

Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Forster, David
Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:32 AM
To:     Jacoby, Ben; Tapscott, Ron; Dypiangco, Mark; Churbock, Scott; Booth, Chris; Mitro, Fred; Grube, Raimund; Gimble, Mathew; Krause, Greg; Kellermeyer, Dave; Hausinger, Sharon; Leigh, Lorie; Carnahan, Kathleen; Inman, Zachary; Zarsky, Lisa; Dalton III, Oscar; Valderrama, Larry; Ratliff, Beau; Carroll, Lex; Clynes, Terri; Sewell, Doug; Llodra, John; Olvera, Paulita; Wood, George; Wheeler, Rob; Politis, Nick; Irani, Eric; Letzerich, Palmer; Sell, Maximilian; Luong, Steven; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; Rorschach, Reagan; Braddock, Billy; Acevedo, Rudy; Jafry, Rahil; Piazze, Tara; Marshall, Howard; Emmons, Suzette; Day, Amanda; Curry, Mike; Jester, Larry; Martinez, Judy; Benke, Terrell; Duffy, Matthew; Meyn, Jim; Reyes, Pauline; Herrera, Fernando; Hamlin, Mason; Lewis, Barry; Trefz, Greg; Cavazos, Brandon; Hiemstra, Nick; Roberts, Chaun; Compean, Karla; Seksaria, Rahul; Ward, Charles; Hill, Garrick; Anderson, Eric; Dickson, Andrew; Landry, Chad; Mccracken, Greg; Marks, David; Munoz, Victor; Kiani-Aslani, John; Robinson, Mitch; Moore, John; Ahmed, Naveed; Marks, James; Murray, Kevin; Golden, Bruce; Vetters, Charles; Lang, John; Tricoli, Carl; Parks, Michelle

Cc:     Mack, Iris
Subject:        FW: Options Session

Due to various scheduling conflicts, this session has been moved to Monday, Nov. 12. The time and location are the same (1:00-2:00 in 5C2).

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Forster, David
Sent:   Monday, October 29, 2001 6:08 PM
To:     Jacoby, Ben; Tapscott, Ron; Dypiangco, Mark; Churbock, Scott; Booth, Chris; Mitro, Fred; Grube, Raimund; Gimble, Mathew; Krause, Greg; Kellermeyer, Dave; Hausinger, Sharon; Leigh, Lorie; Carnahan, Kathleen; Inman, Zachary; Zarsky, Lisa; Dalton III, Oscar; Valderrama, Larry; Ratliff, Beau; Carroll, Lex; Clynes, Terri; Sewell, Doug; Llodra, John; Olvera, Paulita; Wood, George; Wheeler, Rob; Politis, Nick; Irani, Eric; Letzerich, Palmer; Sell, Maximilian; Luong, Steven; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; Rorschach, Reagan; Braddock, Billy; Acevedo, Rudy; Jafry, Rahil; Piazze, Tara; Marshall, Howard; Emmons, Suzette; Day, Amanda; Curry, Mike; Jester, Larry; Martinez, Judy; Benke, Terrell; Duffy, Matthew; Meyn, Jim; Reyes, Pauline; Herrera, Fernando; Hamlin, Mason; Lewis, Barry; Trefz, Greg; Cavazos, Brandon; Hiemstra, Nick; Roberts, Chaun; Compean, Karla; Seksaria, Rahul; Ward, Charles; Hill, Garrick; Anderson, Eric; Dickson, Andrew; Landry, Chad; Mccracken, Greg; Marks, David; Munoz, Victor; Kiani-Aslani, John; Robinson, Mitch; Moore, John; Ahmed, Naveed; Marks, James; Murray, Kevin; Golden, Bruce; Vetters, Charles; Lang, John; Tricoli, Carl; Parks, Michelle

Subject:        Options Session

Iris Mack will be presenting a one-hour session on Monday, Nov. 5 from 1:00 - 2:00 in 5C2, on "Introduction to Options".

This session will cover basic options terms and principles. If there is interest, follow-up sessions will be scheduled which will proceed to greater detail and complexity.

The session is aimed at Power Originators and Midmarketers and is open to all recipients of this email.

Dave


Weather Headlines
Tuesday January 8, 2002
Thaw underway for the short term. Longer range models continue to insist
(as I continue to resist) that real arctic air arrives later in the month.
There is some potential for yet another winter storm in the East late in
the five day period. The point in question is how much cold air is
available or is it just another cold rain for many folks. That will be
answered later in the week. The overall pattern definitely looks warmer for
now though some of this energy goes into melting snow cover rather than
warming the air. The absence of snow in the Plains is one reason why they
are so much warmer relative to normal than areas farther East. But, most of
the country goes warmer than normal before the end of the week. The last to
catch on to this trend is the Southeast.
I am not as bullish as the charts (and some forecasters) in regards to cold
air developing in the medium range period and beyond. I am not saying next
week and the week after will not be colder than this week, they likely will
be. But, I continue to have questions as to intensity and Southern extent
of whatever develops. First, we have yet to see any real polar flow so far
this winter. Second, lack of deep snow cover in the Northern U.S. tends to
inhibit bitter cold. Third, and perhaps most important to me is the lack of
high surface pressures developing over Canada. Now, they may develop
eventually, but I want to see it first. Finally, most models have more of a
West to East configuration at the jet stream level rather than a NW to SE
orientation straight out of the arctic. Given these conditions and recent
history I am just not ready yet to pronounce any major cold developing. In
fact, I would expect the Gulf Coast and SE to actually run warmer than
normal through the 20'th of the month. The Plains, Lakes and NE probably go
back to below normal levels, but not excessively so. It looks comparable to
the past couple of weeks. The West is expected to take on a temperature
profile that closely resembles normal Mid-January levels.
For the period Tuesday January 8 through Saturday January 12, expect the
following temperature trends:
Average 1 to 3-degrees below normal: Southeast?
Average 1 to 3-above normal: Gulf Coast, Mid-Atlantic...
Average 1 to 3-degrees above normal: Northeast, Ohio Valley...
Average 4 to 9-degrees above normal: Northeast, Great Lakes, Ohio and
Mississippi Valleys, Southern Plains and Rockies, California, Intermountain
West, Desert SW, Pacific NW?
Average 10 to locally 20-degrees above normal: Central and Northern
Rockies, Central and Northern Plains...
Andy Weingarten, Meteorologist APB Energy / True Quote


The presentations from the Market Issues Forum meeting of August 9 are now
available at our website. The link below should take you there automatically
but if you have problems, the presentation is located under Client
Services/Meetings & Training/Market Issues Forum.

http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/06/12/200006121229457917.html

Sue Happ
Administrative Assistant
Client Relations
(916) 608-7059
shapp@caiso.com


Kim,
 We currently have a Master with Eastern New Mexico Natural Gas Association,
Inc. (Contract No. 96009607) therefor, the Confirm Desk can do the confirm
once it is put in the system.

Ellen,
 Do you agree?

	Kim Ward
	04/03/2001 09:40 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Dan,

Thanks for looking at this for me.  I did remove the phrase you mention in
number 1 below.  As for a volume cap, I don't think that one is necessary in
this case.  Their TW contract limits them to 1000 MMBtu/day.  Any prices that
are fixed will not include TW transport charges.

Thanks again,

Kim

ps, once their board approves this term sheet, we will need to do a
confirmation.  Will this be generated by you or when the deal is entered into
the system?

Dan J Hyvl
04/02/2001 08:55 AM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Kim,
 I have reviewed your term sheet and have the following questions.
1.  Under Term, you have included the phrase "with annual redetermination"
however I find no redetermination language in the Price  section.  I would
suggest that the phrase be deleted.
2.  Under Quantity, you indicate there expected volumes, however, we need to
put some cap on the maximum, With a 5 year term, we should offer some maximum
such as 200% of the expected volumes.  Any thoughts relating to a cap?
3.  Under Price you indicate that the price could be changed to a Fixed
Price, I assume that you do not intend to include the Transwestern
transportation charges as a part of the Fixed Price.  Is this correct?  and
if so, does the Fixed Price language need to be qualified?
 Otherwise, the term sheet appears okay.
      Dan

	Kim Ward
	03/29/2001 03:52 PM

		 To: Dan Hyvl
		 cc:
		 Subject: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Dan,

Attached is a term sheet that has been sent to Eastern New Mexico gas company
to extend a four year deal that ends on April 30, 2001.  Could you look into
the confirmation for this transaction?  They will be going to the board for
approval at the end of next week so you have some time.  Sorry to bombard
you!!  This one should be easy.

Thanks,

Kim


We are long at PGE system for Wednesday, 9/26/01.  HE7-13 at 46mw, HE14 at 45mw, HE15-20 at 25mw, and HE21-22 at 46mw.  Please sell from Portland system.  Deal #789284.1.  This is due to parking by the NW Cash desk.

Thanks,
Donald Robinson, NW preschedule desk


David Sorenstram
281-236-9218


Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040918.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM