******  ******      **       *************************************
**        **       *  *      ***   U.S. Department of Energy    **
****      **      ******     * Energy Information Administration *
**        **     **    **    ** To unsubscribe see the message ***
******  ******  **      **   ************* footnote **************
EIA, the Nation's clearinghouse for energy statistics. ***********
******************************************************************

(NOTE: To best view this document, your email software should
be set to view the item in an 80 character format, using a
"non-proportional" font, e.g. courier)
******************************************************************

  Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators, 1995-2001
  (Volumes in Billion Cubic Feet)
  _________________________________________________________________

                          Natural Gas in         Change In Working
                       Underground Storage              Gas
                         at End of Period         from Same Period
  Year and Month                                   Previous Year
                  _________________________________________________

                     Base    Working   Totalb/    Volume   Percent
                     Gas       Gas
  _________________________________________________________________

  1995 Totala/...    4,349     2,153     6,503      -453    -17.4
  1996 Totala/...    4,341     2,173     6,513        19      0.9
  1997 Totala/...    4,350     2,175     6,525         2      0.1
  1998 Totala/...    4,326     2,730     7,056       554     25.5

  1999
    January......    4,332     2,073     6,404       361     21.1
    February.....    4,329     1,746     6,075       319     22.4
    March........    4,383     1,406     5,789       223     18.9
    April........    4,381     1,495     5,876       109      7.9
    May..........    4,371     1,835     6,206        61      3.4
    June.........    4,370     2,149     6,519        36      1.7
    July.........    4,370     2,379     6,749       -41     -2.0
    August.......    4,368     2,610     6,978       -88     -3.3
    September....    4,369     2,923     7,292        -5     -0.2
    October......    4,370     3,073     7,443      -118     -3.7
    November.....    4,380     3,065     7,445       -90     -2.8
    December.....    4,383     2,523     6,906      -207     -7.6

    Total........    __        __        __        __        __

  2000
    January......    4,363     1,725     6,088      -370    -17.6
    February.....    4,371     1,300     5,672      -491    -27.4
    March........    4,364     1,150     5,514      -280    -19.6
    April........    4,363     1,184     5,547      -329    -21.8
    May..........    4,356     1,426     5,782      -420    -22.8
    June.........    4,355     1,706     6,061      -450    -20.9
    July.........    4,355     1,996     6,351      -394    -16.5
    August.......    4,355     2,190     6,544      -442    -16.8
    September....    4,354     2,473     6,827      -450    -15.4
    October......  d/4,354   d/2,699     7,053      -374    -12.2
    November.....  d/4,358   d/2,443     6,801      -622    -20.3
    December.....  d/4,352   d/1,720     6,072      -803    -31.8

    Total........    __        __        __        __        __

  2001
    January......    4,344     1,265     5,609      -459    -26.6
    February.....    4,328       912     5,241      -388    -29.8
    March........    4,300       742     5,042      -408    -35.5
    April(STIFS). RE/4,300  RE/1,009  RE/5,309   RE/-175   RE/-14.8
    May(STIFS)...  E/4,300   E/1,484   E/5,784      E/58    E/4.0
  _________________________________________________________________

  See footnotes at end of table.

  Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators, 1995-2001
  (Volumes in Billion Cubic Feet) - Continued
  _______________________________________________________________

                                  Storage Activity

  Year and Month
                  _______________________________________________

                     Injections     Withdrawals         Net
                                                   Withdrawalsc/
  _______________________________________________________________

  1995 Totala/...       2,566           2,974             408
  1996 Totala/...       2,906           2,911               6
  1997 Totala/...       2,800           2,824              24
  1998 Totala/...       2,905           2,379            -526

  1999
    January......          58             682             624
    February.....          63             385             321
    March........          87             384             297
    April........         210             120             -90
    May..........         381              45            -337
    June.........         349              42            -307
    July.........         298              81            -217
    August.......         311              90            -221
    September....         358              43            -315
    October......         247              92            -155
    November.....         173             205              32
    December.....          63             606             543

    Total........       2,598           2,772             174

  2000
    January......          48             829             780
    February.....          78             532             454
    March........         132             294             162
    April........         181             145             -36
    May..........         308              75            -232
    June.........         339              67            -272
    July.........         368              77            -290
    August.......         296             102            -193
    September....         354              72            -282
    October......         313              87            -227
    November.....         108             401             293
    December.....          65             755             690

    Total........       2,591           3,436             845

  2001
    January......          93             559             467
    February.....          71             409             338
    March........         113             293             181
    April(STIFS).       NA              NA            RE/-267
    May(STIFS)...       NA              NA             E/-475
  _______________________________________________________________

   a/ Total as of December 31.
   b/ Total underground storage capacity at the end of each
  calendar year (in billion cubic feet):  1995 - 7,953; 1996 -
  7,980; 1997 - 8,332; 1998 - 8,179; 1999 - 8,229; and 2000 -
  8,246.
   c/ Negative numbers indicate the volume of injections in
  excess of withdrawals. Positive numbers indicate the volume of
  withdrawals in excess of injections.
   d/ Reflects one respondent's reclassification of natural gas
  in underground storage from working gas to base gas.
   E/  = Estimated Data.
  RE/  = Revised Estimated Data.
   NA  = Not Available.
   __  = Not Applicable.

      Notes:  Data for 1995 through 1999 are final.  All other
  data are preliminary unless otherwise noted.  Estimates for the
  most recent two months are derived from the Short-Term
  Integrated Forecasting System (STIFS). See Natural Gas Monthly,
  Appendix A Explanatory Note 7 for a discussion of revision
  policy.  Gas in storage at the end of a reporting period may
  not equal the quantity derived by adding or subtracting net
  injections or withdrawals during the period to the quantity of
  gas in storage at the beginning of the period.  Totals may not
  equal sum of components because of independent rounding.
  Geographic coverage is the 50 States and the District of
  Columbia.
     Sources: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-191,
  Monthly Underground Gas Storage Report of Natural and
  Supplemental Gas Supply and Disposition," and STIFS.
  ____________
  For additional information, please contact the Energy
  Information Administration's National Energy Information Center
  at (202)586-8800.

--------------------------  To Unsubscribe  -----------------------------
You are currently subscribed to ngus as: [gstorey@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-ngus-62522N@tonto.eia.doe.gov.
Please do not use the reply button.


Jaime:
I am not available Wednesday morning.  I'm going to call our Mexican counsel
at 2:30 in the afternoon.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Jaime Williams@ENRON
	07/04/2000 07:16 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Update

Thanks Carol, I understand you are only focusing on the Online transactions,
and all I ask from you is the clearance to do Online transactions.
Regarding Credit, Rod Nelson has been supporting us and he is leaving all the
pending things to Paul Radous.  Last week Rod and I spoke abut this, and his
view is a little different. He believes there could be some exposure if the
same counterparty transacts both on-line and off-line; however, there are
ways to limit the transactions and very probably the likelihood of that
happening is very little.  He was going to put together an opinion froom
their side, and I suggest we have a conference call wednesday morning....
I am traveling wednesday but reachable through my assistant Barbara.
011-452-8-152-2404.   PLease call any time is convenient for you so we can
discuss this matter and also talk to your counsel.
Thanks and regards.

   Carol St Clair @ ECT                06/30/2000 11:10 AM

To: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Update

Jaime:
Here is a message that I received from our counsel.  Again, I and they are
just focusing on the Enron Online issues and Sara is handling the issues
relating to doing transactions offline between Enron Mexico and the Mexican
counterparties.  I will suggest to our counsel that we have a call mid next
week involving you, me and them.  What is your availability on Wednesday?
Alos, who from credit are you dealing with and are they aware that we
probably will not be able to in a bankruptcy situation offset amounts owed
with respect to the online and offline transactions?

Jeff:
Are there any tax issues that we need to be concerned about regarding the
online piece of this?
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 11:00 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	06/30/2000 08:05 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Update

Mark and David:
Here is the status of research our counsel in Mexico is doing re online
issues.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 08:04 AM -----

	"Pablo Perezalonso" <pperezalonso@rhm.com.mx>
	06/29/2000 07:41 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Update

Carol:

We are working on the questionaire, but we have been delayed. We will have an
initial draft by the middle of next week.

Regards

>>> "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 06/29/00 04:41PM >>>

Pablo and Jose:
Could one of you e-mail me with an update of how your review of the online
issues and documents is going and when we may be able to visit about your
views
on these matters?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


i don't understand that last email


I spoke with Scott Miller yesterday about several issues, so of course
California came up.  Scott expressed frustration with the California
situation and indicated that he thinks California will never be able to move
away from its current problems without a comprehensive solution, led by an
entity like the Administration.  Scott said he thinks all the parties need to
come to the table and reach some sort of agreement to net out the differences
between what suppliers are owed and what California thinks it is owed in
refunds.  Once that is accomplished, the parties would then agree to enter
into 1-3 year supply contracts at agreed-upon prices for the bulk of
California's power needs.

Scott has been floating this idea with his colleagues (unnamed) who countered
with "Would Ken Lay agree to something like that?"  I told him that I agree
there needs to be a comprehensive solution to California but I did not know
what Enron would agree to.  I asked him if he has heard anything about the
Vice President's task force and whether the report will propose something
like this.  Scott indicated that he and his group have had no contact with
the task force and he has no information as to what will be in the report.
This workout plan is just Scott's idea for now.

Scott said he thinks the current scenario is unworkable, that there is not a
lot of internal support for Hebert's approach, and that things will get
worse.  For example, Scott said that although generators are the only
suppliers subject to cost justification at present, if the problems continue,
marketers will be subject to the same cost justification in the future.

I thought you all would be interested in this conversation.  I told Scott
that since Joe has changed jobs, that he should feel free to call me with
questions or to talk about things like this, and he also told me to call him
whenever we need him.  Although Scott is not expecting a response from us on
his California idea, if we do have some sort of response, we may want to
convey it to him just to show our interest in working  with him and his group
and that we have a similar interest in resolving the problems in California.


Liz called and they are inviting us over Sat nite for a very
low key and relaxing taco night or - they thought maybe you can help them figure out
how to use their grill...since you are the 'grill master'
let me know
ily
kq


please remind me that I have a dentist's appt. on Thursday, Aug. 3 at
4:00pm.  I need to leave here about 3:15pm.

thank you.


Hey Shorty,

I just got back into town from Memphis (they really like Elvis) and
Washington D.C., so that explains the delay in getting back to you.  I got my
car detailed at Dream's car wash on San Felipe (just before Target).  They do
a good job but don't get all the extra stuff they want to sell you.  I hope
you had a fun Halloween weekend/last night and after Oklahoma dismantled
Nebraska, the Longhorn whooping doesn't look that bad anymore (...but Texas
in the top 20?).

Ted

Susan M Scott
10/30/2000 11:48 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey,

Quick question, I was hoping to go get my car detailed this weekend and I
remembered that you had your truck detailed a while back...I was wondering
where you had it done and if you thought they did a good job ( I'm assuming
the place is pretty close to our area of town).  I finally got into the
parking garage and have decided I now have real incentive to keep my car
looking nice.

Hope things are well with you.  I talked to Darren last week and it sounds as
though he is extremely busy these days.  I'm guessing the story's much the
same with you - a far cry from the listless days you two spent in Net Works.
Anyway, if you could let me know about the detailing I would appreciate it.

Susan

By the way, since there's no telling if I'll have the opportunity to gloat
two weeks from now (Tech in Lubbock is never a safe bet) - and while neither
season has been one for the record books (except of course for our loss to OU
- one of the worst in history) - I noticed that unlike the Longhorns, your
beloved Bruins are conspicuously absent from the top 25.  Oh well, c'est la
vie.


Drew -- here is Lorraine's update on the Val Verde situation that I mentioned
in my previous e-mail.   Recall that we've been unable to accept quantities
of gas from Burlington because of the high temperatures at the interconnect
in recent years.  I've recommended that we seek amendment of the contract as
soon as possible to reflect what we CAN do.

The proposed amendment Lorraine is referring to, which Burlington rejected,
modified our obligation to provide firm compression sufficient to accept
250,000 MMBtu.

//
Burlington Resources - Val Verde Plant - Michelle and I had a follow-up
conversation with BR Thursday.  I faxed the proposed amendment to BR Monday
and we hadn't heard from them yet.  They claim approximately $135,000/month
in lost revenues because we are holding their production down.  Michele and
Darrell will work to pull together the data on exactly which days we have not
been able to take BR's gas.  I mentioned to BR that we were putting this info
together, but they claim since they were told to back off to 180,000 -
190,000 MMBtu from about mid-June through July, our data would not accurately
reflect BR's inability to schedule in excess of 180/190.  They will not
accept our wording in the interconnect amendment, specifically "best efforts"
and "subject to operating conditions on TW", so we will need to revise this
further.

We offered alternate receipt point flexibility at Ignacio and alternate
delivery point flexibility at El Paso Blanco on their Jackrabbit contract but
they do not think this is sufficient to agree to amend the interconnect
agreement.  They have suggested we consider giving them a deeper discount on
their San Juan - Waha contract (80,000/d, $0.14, term 11/30/06).

The ball is in our court.


---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 06:27
PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@EES
06/27/2000 10:27 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Reliant Letter to Gov. Davis

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 06/27/2000 12:24
PM ---------------------------

"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com> on 06/26/2000 04:02:30 PM
To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tim Loposer" <tim.loposer@williams.com>, "Sue
Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <mcfaddenjr@aol.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>,
"John Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan"
<joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<jwilley@conpwr.com>, "JAnet Heck-Doyle" <jheckdoyle@aol.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Dennis Elliott" <delliott@energy.twc.com>, "Dave
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Cody Carter"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn A Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob
Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>,
"Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Reliant Letter to Gov. Davis

Greetings:
Please find a copy of the Reliant letter to the Governor.

-----Original Message-----
From: curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com
[mailto:curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 1:53 PM
To: john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com; stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com;
rhoward@reliantenergy.com
Cc: smutny@iepa.com; steven@iepa.com; kaplan@iepa.com
Subject: Reliant Letter to Gov. Davis

Attached is a revised draft of Reliant's letter to Gov. Davis.

(See attached file: Gov. Davis Letter.rev1.doc)

 - Gov. Davis Letter.rev1.doc


<http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?MLNUM=518049>

this one has 4.5% financing


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 04:27 PM -----

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	11/07/2000 04:13 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ClickPaper approvals, 11/6/00

Attached is the revised Clickpaper approvals list for 11-06-00

Note: Counterparty called back and reverified the Legal Name for Delta paper
Corporation


Mr Taylor,
I have attached my resume, that explains what the heck I have been doing.   Let me know if anyone has interest in a profitable Woodlands boy.

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allan Taylor <allan_taylor@anadarko.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:33 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	RE: what's happening?

Anadarko does not currently operate any power plants.  Primarily E&P and
related marketing functions (trade gas/crude/ngl's).  I have heard of a
project that is beginning that is looking into the prospects of trading
electricity.  How soon that may occur is simply a guess.  Obviously
there is a substantial amount of hedging activity related to the
gas/crud/ngl's.  You can always check the web site to see if there are
other areas you may be interested in.  Hope all works out well.  Send me
you resume if you wish.  Give me a call after Thanksgiving and we can
try to meet at Mollys/Papas one afternoon.  Phone numbers:
832-636-7045 (w)
281-298-7860 (h)
Keep in touch, ajt.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Forney, John M. [SMTP:John.M.Forney@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:10 PM
> To:	Allan Taylo (E-mail)
> Subject:	what's happening?
>
>
>
> AJ,
> Thanks for checking in with me.   I had a couple of questions:
> Does Anadarko have any power plants or do they trade gas/electricity
> actively?      I currently do several things:
> I am the Manager of the real time Power Trading desk.    I also manage
> the Ercot Asset book.   I trade around a combined cycle gas plant in
> south Texas.
> I am required to trade gas along with  the power in order to properly
> hedge the plant.
> I would be interested in continuing in this area.
>
> Thanks for anything you can tell me about working at Anadarko.   I
> could
> send my resume,  but if we dont have paralell needs,  then I wont
> bother.
> I have some other things that I am working on.
>
> Thanks again for asking.  This company will be fine,  but I have
> worked
> 12-14 hours/day for 8+ years.   When the stock price is $90, I can
> somewhat justify the hours and lack of life.   However,   although I
> am
> sure that Enron will bounce back,  I am no longer willing to sacrifice
> to make it so.
>
> I have been consistenly profitable in my time here.   I have never
> been
> on a losing team - we have always made major money for the company,
> so
> it is very hard to understand how this whole thing is unwinding.
>
> Anyway,  thanks again and I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> JMF
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
> or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
> be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
> and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Ben,

DC is still treating me well.  10 years here and still going.  My wife and I
moved into our new home in June.  So I've been getting settled in the new
place all summer, real busy but it's been fun.  Just had the 1 year
anniversary, can't believe it's been that long.  Flather Hall, Kitty's, and
'box' seem like yesterday...

Marlon's wedding sounds like fun, too bad it's Homecoming weekend.  Would be
nice to see everybody.  We need to make some plans and all get together
soon.  The marathon sounds great, good luck, the only running I have time
for these days is from Home Depot and back to the house. But I manage to go
to the gym a few days a week to maintain my 250 lbs slim figure.

I still hang out with Penney and his new little girl, never thought he would
be the first to have a baby.  Saw Ken and Theo a few weeks ago in DC.  Dolan
and Sofie are now in San Fran and I talk to him from time to time.

Hard to make plans with a big bunch of people.  Sometimes you just gotta
make the plans with a few and throw it out there for the rest of the group.
Let me know if you have any ideas or possible locations.  Maybe just plan a
weekend somewhere, DC or otherwise and try to get as many people together.
Maybe a big party or something like that.  We'll hire Vince O'Neill to
organize it.  An un-official homecoming party.

See ya

Christopher J. Lukawski
Project Manager
HITT Contracting Inc.
http://www.hitt-gc.com <http://www.hitt-gc.com>
703-444-9453 voice
703-444-7096 fax
703-814-1235 pager

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [SMTP:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
 Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 4:41 PM
 To: clukawski@hitt-gc.com
 Subject:

 Luke:
 How are ya?  How is the DC area these days?  Houston is still
fucking hot
 and Enron is still doing well and the price is still screaming so
things
 are good.  In response to your inquiry regarding Homecoming.  Megan
and I
 are actually, if you can believe it, going to Marlon and Marissa's
wedding
 the first weekend in October in NJ.  Also, OB, Chobu, Mike, Corpina
and
 Danny, Patty D, Sammy, Amy, etc. are going as well - should be
interesting.
 I haven't seen some of those people for quite awhile.  I was trying
to set
 something up, but that came up as well as I'm running in this year's
NYC
 Marathon, which is the first Sunday in Novemebr, so trying to
arrange
 something became even harder.  I still want to get together with you
guys,
 but trying to figure out when and where.  Suggestions are welcomed.
Hope
 all is going well and talk to you soon.
 Ben

 (713) 853-7998 Office Ph.

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

**********************************************************************


The second phase of reconstruction on IH 45 between W. Dallas and Memorial
will begin Saturday, November 11, 2000, all northbound lanes will be closed
at 7 PM.  All northbound traffic will detour to US 59 North to IH-610 Loop.
Two northbound lanes will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000, at 5 AM.

  The Houston Avenue / Memorial Avenue exit and the entrance from Pease,
  St. Joseph's Parkway, and Walker  will be closed until further notice.
Anyone
  typically using these routes must find an alternate route.

The following routes are recommended by the Texas Department of Transportation

New Ramp Chartres at Runnels to IH 10 West

Louisiana North to IH 10 West on ramp

Allen Parkway to Studemont or Waugh to IH 10

West Gray to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

Bagby (W. Dallas) to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

San Jacinto to IH 10 East

North on main to IH 45

Travis to IH 45

The Downtown District is updating it's web site with detailed road closure
maps and suggested alternate routes.  This information is available at
http://www.downtownstreets.com. Please check this site regularly for updates
on street closures.


Here is a draft list of potential buyers of the assets.
Ben
3-7998