The  CERA  executive roundtable meeting  summary  results are as  follows:
If you are interested  in  a complete  set  of  the graphs from the
presentations  please  let me know.

ELECTRIC POWER  PART  ONE
PEAK  TRENDS
It is  noteworthy how  rapidly volatility can change geographically in the
electric  markets.  Last  year  the U.S. Midwest/South areas   were  the
peakiest,  but   it reversed  this year  with  the  West  being highest  at
the peaks  and in New England --  but only   in early May 2000 were  hgih
peaks  apparent  there.

Demand  can vary from half the peak max  to the max.  Peakers  can be on the
margin on the upper half of the supply mix in many markets.  We need to
watch  gas prices  this  winter  as they can effect  winter peak power
prices--not  just a  summer phenomenon.

Where  are  the most gas plants  now on the margin?  Ercot, FRCC, Neepool,
NYPP, SERC, WSCC

A  DISCONNECT
There  is  a disconnect  in the on-peak forward market price for power in
Texas now; with the  added  5 GW  Texas forward markets  do not seem to
take this  into account yet.  (Note:  Vince Kaminski) The  Texas forward
market  should be  very soft  next summer  unless  we return to  105 degree
F  temperatures.    New England  is  just one year behind  Texas  in its
overbuild.

One main  reason for the  spikes  in Calif  is   power plants  did not  get
built in Calif   due  to  a lack of  a capacity  charge ..and  this is not a
panacea...as Calif also  has  many  enviro/siting  hurdles  that challenge
developers  who want to site as well.

  .

TSUNAMI OF  MERCHANT  CAPACITY PLANNED?
CERA   sees  over  240,000  MW  of planned  capacity over  the  2000-2005
period;  with   25,000 MW  being  completed  in  2000;  35 MW under
construction  for   2001 and 15 000 MW under  construction for   2002--  but
the market  only needing   13 000  to  15 000 MW  a year.   This   shall
lead  to  many  and large deferrals and  delays, especially in  2001  and
2002.  What  has  been the recent  history?   US  wide  over the
past  3 years  just  11 percent of the planned  capacity  was  actually
finished  and   18 percent  of that planned  was  actually  under
construction.  They  assume  a  24 month  construction completion  time.

FOR PROFIT  TRANSMISSION
Cera   sees  Allegheny Energy  in PJM West;  Entergy in SPP;  Southern  in
SERC  and Alliant  in MAPP  as all for profit transcos.
TYPICAL   O&M COSTS  IN U.S.  TRANSCOS
 Why  do  O&M  costs   differ  widely  among  transcos?  Some  costs  are  3
to 8 times higher  than the norm  at
$5000 in O&M expense  per 5000  system  miles  in size.  Regulatory
overhang  allows  this...this is  weather  adjusted  to remove  high  costs
from  big  freezes  etc.

USING REAL OPTION MODEL  VS  POWER PLANT  NPV
You  want to  try to have  the base value of  an asset  going  forward  when
you expect volatility  and include  historical  spreads  and  fuel/power
price  swing  assumptions.

CALIFORNIA  MARKET IS BROKEN
This market  starts  to  work  only after it   gets into  a reliability
crisis.  No incentives  to add power  plant  capacity  and
huge hurdles   against  siting   even when the market  signals the  need is
there.  Will the  regulator's post 2000  fix  make it  worse?

PEAK POWER  DEMAND  FORECAST
As  percent  per year  change  vs   2000  Cera  sees   2001  as follows:
New Eng  / New York 6.3 /  6.2  percent
PJM / ECAR   7.7 / 4.4 percent
MAIN /  MAPP    3.0 /   -0.1
SERC /  FRCC   1.3 /  2.3  percent
SPP /  ERCOT    4.0  /  2.3
NWPP /  Rockies     -6.8  /  -0.6
AZNM /  Calif-SoNV   -0.9   /   4.0
USA  avg    up  2.6  percent   It  looks  like Calif. in in for a   touch
summer  in 2001  as well.

NATURAL  GAS  PART   TWO
SUPPLY  SHORT
Year   2001  supply  rebound could  be  800mmcfd   to 1.0  bcfd;  Canada   in
2001  up only  400  a  day; in the US  we  need   2  bcfd  more supply  for
2001  demand.  alone  let alone  storage   refill.... yet  a
cold winter  now  could   add   3  to 4  bcfd  to demand  and slash
storages.  The  fall in drilling  in 1999  and early  2000  took   3.5  bcfd
productive  capacity out of the  supply pool.  It  will  take  till  2005
for US production to  reach a 4.1 bcfd  gain versus  today's production.

ADDED  GAS  FOR POWER PLANTS
Right now  Cera  expects  an incremental  need for   1  bcfd  next year for
these plants..this will  keep prices  high

MUCH MORE POWER SWING
1990 to 1992  we needed   5  bcfd  for power plant  swings;   now  we need
10  bcfd;  offpeak use is  even up  5  bcfd vs  10 years  ago.

RESI  USE  IS UP
The  AGA  disco members   adds   750 000 new gas   homes  each year  and
this  builds  demand  year   round.

INDUSTRIAL   NUG  DEMAND
Of  the   24  bcfd ( 8.77 Tcf) industrials  gas use  in the US;     8.6
bcfd   (  3.1  Tcf) of this  is for  power plant  and non-mfg  use.

HOW  FAST  CAN CANADA  ADD?
Canada  can add   3.6  bcfd   by  2005   versus  now;   adding  each year
from  2001 to 2005 as follows:  500/800/900/700/700  mcfd annually.

IS  ARCTIC  GAS  ON THE HORIZON?
Its  is  far away;   maybe   4  or  5  bcfd  by  2015..  This  means  up  to
2.7  bcfd  to  flow  to Midwest  by 2015  and up  to  2.4  bcfd  to
Calif./PNW   on expansions  by  2015.


-----Original Message-----
From: Almeida, Keoni [mailto:KAlmeida@caiso.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: A/S inter-SC trade

Scenario 1
EPMI makes a forward deal with Duke to provide its "obligation" for A/S.
Essentially EPMI is trading off its "obligation" to Duke using inter-SC
template which references the SC (Duke) that is taking on the obligation.
No energy is scheduled by EPMI, just the indication that the obligation is
going to Duke.  The energy curve is scheduled by Duke only.  EPMI can not
schedule the energy. Duke is responsible for providing the energy and
receiving the payment or No Pay.  Although, Duke has various options as to
how they will take care of the traded obligation.  Suffice it to say EPMI
only has to trade their obligation and it is then Duke's obligation to deal
with as they choose.  If Duke chooses to let the ISO provide for that
obligation then there would not be any energy or No-Pay issues.

Scenario 2
EPMI has a resource within its portfolio that will self provide the
obligation for A/S.  EPMI puts in a schedule indicating which resource, the
capacity that will be self provided, and the energy that will be bid in.
EPMI recieves the payment for the energy and any No Pay charges.

Hope this helps.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>


This is all I have received.   I asked for a confirmation, but have not
received one yet.  I got Lysa's phone mail, so I don't know if she is there
or not.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
06:52 PM ---------------------------

Lysa Akin
12/11/2000 05:43 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conference Call re: Gas Curtailment and Diversion Paper

Please advise ASAP your availability for a call regarding the above
referenced topic on Wednesday, December 13th at
7:00 am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern

Lysa Akin
Enron Corp.
Sr. Admin. Ass't. - Gov't Affairs
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR  97204
Office (503) 464-7927
Fax (503) 464-3740
lysa.akin@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hernandez, Bert
Sent:	Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:36 PM
To:	Giambrone, Laura; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Christopher L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	LATE NIGHT NOTES

It seems like a lifetime ago, but the system actually behaved itself and didn't invalidate points on contracts or stall during any of the processes.

ID2:		No variances or manually scheduled items.

EVE:		Small variance at ANR due to problem with USGT at NNG-Halley.  Transcolorado is off, but I should be able to fix it on 		ID2.

See you later,  Bert


Hi Greg,

The agreement isn't  attached.  (I do that ALL the time.)

ckm


Erica,

Yes, no problem.

Vince

Information Risk Management
12/01/2000 09:50 AM
To: Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For Your Approval

PLease let me know if he is approved.

Thanks,
Erica Garcia
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
12/01/2000 09:39 AM ---------------------------

	Security Resource Request System
Directory Line Item		Pending Access Processing

Directory Name:			o:\weather derivatives\  , o:\research\common
Service Type:	Grant
Expiration Date:
Comments:

	Security Processing
Processing Status:
E-Mail Message:
Comments/Justification:

	General Information           	Request:	JHRC-4RKJJZ
Requested By:	Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT	Phone:	33914
Requested For:	Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT	Employee Type:
Company:	0011	RC #:	100038
Priority:	High
Comments/Justification:			I have a test Windows2000 machine running  (with
userid t_weather01, for which I need access to o:\research\common and
o:\weather derivatives\

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
1	Information Risk Management 	11/30/2000 12:30:19 PM


Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David; Kroll, Heather
Cc: drhunt@watervalley.net; gbojp@netdoor.com
Subject: Energy Management Agreement

Good afternoon,

I am circulating a draft of the long term agreement for your review. There
are still holes, but hopefully it sets out the basic commercial deal.

Please note that  we are anticipating a Monday meeting.  Therefore, we have
sent this out without the usual internal review.

We hope to have a set of exhibits shortly.

Talk to you soon,

Kay


ttached are the revenues and the volumes per counterparty that you requested.  Please note that the revenue and OPM cost information is in Canadian dollars.  I will be forwarding a copy of our MSA Agreement template shortly.  Please call me once you've had a chance to review the information.


Attached is Steve Kean's presentation.

Are you available for lunch with Steve on Monday, January 8th?  Please give
me a call at 3-1808 and we can get you on Steve's calendar.

     Maureen McVicker
     Steve's Assistant


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 01:47
PM ---------------------------

Scott Hendrickson
07/25/2000 01:37 PM
To: Julie Gomez, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Fraley,
bruce.s.grant@lmco.com, Ejmunion@aol.com
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000
01:34 PM ---------------------------

John Craig Taylor
07/25/2000 01:25 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N
Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

<< > You have just received the "Aggie Virus"
  >
  > As we don't have any programming experience, this virus works on the
  > honor system.  Please delete all the files from your hard drive and
  > manually forward this virus to everyone on your mailing list.
  >
  > Thanks for your cooperation,
  > Texas A & M Computer Engineering Dept >>


Morrissey, Kathi would like to recall the message, "SEC Filings for November
2000 Activity".


Stinson,

Any comments?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
04:38 PM ---------------------------

	Tracy L Arthur

	03/19/2001 03:29:37 PM

To: David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnCounter Article - Shalesh Ganjoo

We have conducted an interview and written the attached article for the
upcoming edition of the EnCounter, the Associate & Analyst Programs'
newsletter.  The interview was conducted with Shalesh Ganjoo in regards to
his participation with the implementation of storage capacity as a
commodity.

To ensure our publication is printing the most accurate information, I have
attached the article for your review.  Please confirm that the information
provided from Shalesh Ganjoo is accurate.

Thank you in advance for your assistance,
Tracy Arthur
Communication Specialist
Associate & Analyst Department
713-345-7853


This request has been pending your approval for  35 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079466&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079466
Request Create Date : 12/17/01 4:09:11 PM
Requested For       : rodney.malcolm@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


The following will not deal:

Burlington
Salt River Project
Socal Gas
Dynegy
Phibro
TXU
Coral
Engage
WESCO
Entergy-Koch
J Aaron (They are clicking to close out positions only)

Grigsby


Thank you for making your purchase online with Expedia.com, one of
the safest places to shop for travel! For your protection, our
security systems review purchases for potential credit card
misuse. If any misuse of your credit card is identified, we will
contact you before processing the transaction and issuing tickets;
otherwise you can assume your e-ticket is confirmed.

For flight check-in and departure information, please
contact your airline directly.

Your flight information appears below. It is also available online
at the My Trips page at Expedia.com:
http://expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=litn

You can also make or review your car and hotel reservations from the
same page.

If you are thinking about changing your flights, you can use our
Exchange Calculator to find out what change penalties apply and what
the new fare would be:
http://expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=ewvs&itid=21126882

If you need to get in touch with us about your flights, send an e-mail
message to travel@expedia.com, or simply reply to this message. You can
also reach our customer service team 24 hours a day at
1 (800) EXPEDIA (1-800-397-3342).

We're committed to providing you with the best travel service available
anywhere, and we want to hear what you think. Please let us know how
we're doing by filling out our online survey:
http://expedia.com/daily/survey/survey.asp

For information about your destination, please refer to our online
guidebook, the Destination Guides:
http://expedia.com/wg

----------------------------------------------------------------------

FLIGHT SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
E-Ticket Confirmed
Itinerary Number: 12112688242
Round Trip
Booking ID: 4E4BOO
2 adults USD 368.38
Taxes: USD 44.62

Total Cost: USD 413.00

Flight: from Newark, NJ (EWR-Newark International Airport) to Houston, TX
(IAH-Bush Intercontinental)
Depart: 22-May-01 at 10:50 AM
Arrive: 22-May-01 at  1:40 PM

 Depart: Newark (EWR), 22-May-01 at 10:50 AM
 Arrive: Houston (IAH), 22-May-01 at  1:40 PM
 Flight: Continental  209
 Aircraft:  MDC DC10
 Meal Service: Lunch
 Duration: 3hr 50mn
 Distance: 1415 mi
 Economy/Coach Class

Flight: from Houston, TX (IAH-Bush Intercontinental) to Newark, NJ
(EWR-Newark International Airport)
Depart: 29-May-01 at  3:45 PM
Arrive: 29-May-01 at  8:22 PM

 Depart: Houston (IAH), 29-May-01 at  3:45 PM
 Arrive: Newark (EWR), 29-May-01 at  8:22 PM
 Flight: Continental   42
 Aircraft:  MDC DC10
 Meal Service: Dinner
 Duration: 3hr 37mn
 Distance: 1415 mi
 Economy/Coach Class

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your E-ticket is confirmed.

You will not receive a paper receipt, itinerary, or confirmation letter
automatically.
We suggest you keep a copy of this e-mail or print a copy of your itinerary
for
your records; it may also be useful when you check in at the airport.

When you arrive at the airport on the day of your flight(s), give the
ticket agent your last name, flight number and a government-issued photo
identification to receive your boarding pass(es).

Airlines require government-issued photo identification upon check-in,
such as a driver's license or passport. For questions concerning this
requirement, please contact the airline.

A valid passport is required for international travel. Some countries
also have visa and/or health requirements. Please check with the embassy
of the country to which you are traveling or consult Expedia.com's
Destination Guide:
http://expedia.com/wg

Have a great trip!

Expedia.com Travel Team
Don't just travel. Travel Right.
http://www.expedia.com/

When you use the American Express Card, you will not be held responsible for
unauthorized charges online.


Applied Finance - May 31-June 1, 2001
in EB552   Cost:  $700.00

The objective of this program is not to teach you how to do a deal, but rather, to give you a better understanding of how basic financial principals contribute to the structure of a deal.    It will also provide you with insight to Enron deals in order that you can make a contribution to the work that goes into putting one together.

When you leave the program, you will have:

R	An understanding of basic financial and accounting issues relevant to Enron's transactions.
R	A basic understanding of how Enron structures deals - the "deal space" and how the financial principals discussed 	relate to 	Enron deals.
R	The ability to take the financial principals and apply them to an Enron deal.

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website, http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.


I have been billing Koch Midstream Services Co under ENA for meters
LL-1-0030-Comitas (Sitara #144052) and LL-1-0027-Volpe (Sitara #144049).  My
former accounting contact at Koch, Michael Thomas, said that Koch sold these
south texas assets to Duke Energy Field Services back in 1999.  Michael faxed
a contract which I forwarded to Cindy Balfour Flannigan in the contract
area.  Cindy said she can't tie the deals in the contract to our system so
she can't recognize the assignment.  Cindy has left messages with Koch, but
she has not been able to resolve the issue.    Koch is refusing to pay for
the gas and there is currently over a million dollars outstanding relating to
these deals.  I need to find out whether Koch or Duke is responsible for
paying for this gas.  Do you have any information regarding this issue?

Thanks,
Tina Valadez
3-7548

---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 02:47 PM

To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Tina,

With regards ti the Koch Midstream, you could talk to Daren Farmer about it.
Also, Carlos Rodriguez could help.

Ami


Stephanie,

Thanks for remembering about me.
Yes, I want to renew.

Vince

From: Stephanie E Taylor on 11/29/2000 01:18 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Subscription Renewal

Dear Vince,

This is to inform you that your subscription to Risk is up for renewal.  The
regular subscription cost through December, 2001, is $599.00.  The cost after
the corporate discount is $509.15.

Please let me know if you would like to renew this publication.  We will be
happy to take care of this for you.  If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Taylor


You will be migrated to outlook on Monday night 5/14/01.  You will be
receiving a series of four emails between now and then, please open and read.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks
-Ina Rangel


They should if they are dealing with transport, gas daily options,  etc. which are effected by the omicrons.  I would typically go to the leads of the respective regions, tell them which curves are unmapped and let them decide what omicron curve to use ( a lot of times they just asked the trader in charge of that point which curve to use).

If the leads don't know what the omicron curves are the company's in trouble!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: Unmapped curves

Do the traders know about the omicron curves?

From:	Susan M Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 03:24 PM
To:	David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	RE: Unmapped curves

you're not slow at all....you just have to figure out which region they're in and ask the appropriate trader which gas daily volatility they'd like to use.

Congrats on "the move"...O'Neal told me the good news.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:39 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: Unmapped curves

How do you determine which Omicron curve to use for the curves that don't have one?

I know ... I'm slow.

From:	Susan M Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 10:40 AM
To:	David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	RE: Unmapped curves

If you pull the Curves up under Pub Names you should be able to tell if the have any Omicrons attached to them on the Erms side...if the do, then you have to talk to Nilay Basu to make sure they are mapped on the Germs side...if they don't, then you'll have to attach an omicron and then speak with Nilay.  I can swing by later if you'd like me to explain in a little more detail.

Susan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	Unmapped curves

How do I find out the omicron curves for these curves?  Would George know?

Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 09:11 AM ---------------------------
From:	Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 01:59 PM
To:	David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Burton McIntyre/ENRON@enronXgate, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Unmapped curves

Please see below and note that the following curves do not have any omicron vol curves.  Can you help map these?

Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Basu, Nilay
Sent:	Friday, April 27, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	nbasu@ect.enron.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-nbasu+40ect+2Eenron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, April 27, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	nbasu@ect.enron.com
Subject:

[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for ALLIANCE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for IF-PORTLAND in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./NIPSCO in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-TR-PH      ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: ARUBA-TP-PHY1        ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: ARUBA-TP-PHY1        ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for BB IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for CENTRAL IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for GBA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for GBA TGS IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for NQN TGN IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for SALTA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for SZ SUR IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for BB IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for CENTRAL IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for GBA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for GBA TGS IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for NQN TGN IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for SALTA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for SZ SUR IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-DEN-GDL           ] Can't not find mapping for GDP-CIG/CHEYENN in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-TEXAS-P1       ] Can't not find mapping for IF-TEXOMA OFFER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: GD-NEW-GDL0          ] Can't not find mapping for GDP-CIG/CHEYENN in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-IM-ENOV-PHY       ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-IM-ENOV-PHY       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for CORNWALL/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for EMPRESS-CDN/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for PARK-CDN/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for ALLIANCE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for IF-PORTLAND in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./NIPSCO in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-MT-2       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-CNT-TR-PH      ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: ARUBA-TP-PHY1        ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: ARUBA-TP-PHY1        ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for BB IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for CENTRAL IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for GBA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for GBA TGS IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for NQN TGN IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for SALTA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: SC-GAS               ] Can't not find mapping for SZ SUR IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for BB IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for CENTRAL IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for GBA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for GBA TGS IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for NQN TGN IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for SALTA IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ARG-PH         ] Can't not find mapping for SZ SUR IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-DEN-GDL           ] Can't not find mapping for GDP-CIG/CHEYENN in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-TEXAS-P1       ] Can't not find mapping for IF-TEXOMA OFFER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: GD-NEW-GDL0          ] Can't not find mapping for GDP-CIG/CHEYENN in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-IM-ENOV-PHY       ] Can't not find mapping for CHI./N/BORDER in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: FT-IM-ENOV-PHY       ] Can't not find mapping for NGI/CHI./PEOPLE in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for CORNWALL/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for EMPRESS-CDN/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL
[Book: INTRA-ONTARIO4       ] Can't not find mapping for PARK-CDN/IM in table RMS_INTRA_IF_VOL


I thought you might be interested in reading this web page: I LOVE YOU!
http://www.cog7.org/ubbpub/Forum3/HTML/000068.html


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
07:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling @ ENRON                           03/13/2001
04:17 PM

Sent by: Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: California Energy Crisis

California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


CAISO BOG 10/25/01
Notes taken by G. Alan Comnes

Meeting went from about 10:30 to 1 p.m.

Written materials discussed at this meeting are available at www.caiso.com/bog.

1. Budget.  Board approved budget, which contains a significant increase in GMCs and, for the first time applies GMC fees, on the self provision of A/S.  The motion to adopt was modified to say the Board would revisit budget if, in response to Gov. Davis requests to par budgets, the CAISO budget is cut.
2. Retirement plan Audit
3. Allocation of Above-MCP 487 charges.  This mechanism will improve the allocation of OOM costs so that the per-MWh charges match up with actual OOM costs.  Stated that penalty revenues used to lower OOM costs could come from imbalance penalties.  Action. approved (?) to allow staff to make a tariff amendment on this change.
4. Winter Assessment. Presentation by staff  Kahn took issue (i.e., did not even want staff report presented) that CAISO does an assessment without consulting the Power Authority, CPUC, and the CEC.   Worried about conflicting with the other resource assessments out there and giving media ways to take shots at DWR buying practices.  In the end, the full presentation was not given but questions were asked about whether the assessment spells trouble or provides assurance.   The answer:  things are tight in some months but are expected to be ok given the level of conservative assumptions used in the analysis.  Action: staff was tasked to compare this assessment with CEC's and others and come back in another month.
5. Generator maintenance program.  Will use GADS data.  This program is mandatory for PGA generator units. CAISO staffer represented that no other ISO has a prescriptive program like the one CAISO is proposing.  Current schedule:  brief FERC staff next week, return to Board in November for approval, make FERC filing, implement in early '02. Benchmarks are based on each unit's historical performance; i.e. dogs will be benchmarked against their past doggy behavior.  There is no component to raise the "bar" on performance but a unit that falls relative to past performance would trigger further review.
6. MSC Selection Committee.  MSC provides "independent" review of the CAISO markets for CAISO, the state, and FERC.  Wolak is the only member left at the moment.  Selection committee will be Sheffrin, Wolak, and Borenstein.  Candidates will go to Exec. Director and the final candidates to the Board in February 2002 (!).  Kahn questioned how the MSC can survive with only one member and take until February 02 to select a final members.  Nonetheless, the glacially paced schedule was adopted.
7. FERC RTO Seams Issues.  Steve Greenleaf presented.  Updated BOG on RTO week and said that the "4 RTO" model took a step backward ("off the table" in the words of Chair Wood) in response to criticism from state PUCs on Thursday.  (Is this an accurate recounting of Day 4?).  ISO is engaged in interregional coordination.  Mentioned "CSIC" group   Mentions SSGWY's (?)sponsorship of a market monitoring workshop on November 16.
8. Update of CERS Settlement BEEP/AS Payment Procedure.  Edison and PG&E "are making progress" but no agreement with CERS have been reached.  SDG&E signed and the procedure was implemented at least in part with SDG&E.
9.  Monthly reports: financial.
10. Monthly reports: DMA.  Sheffrin. Mostly followed the briefing charts.  Emphasized the following: CERS OOM purchases are generally down and are reasonably priced once purchases and sales are disaggregated.  Said that suppliers are still bidding above costs.  DMA files confidential reports that include info on bidding data weekly to FERC.  Bids are not coming down.  Intrazonal congestion is up due to new generation coming on line.  That allows generators to play the "dec" game.


Bob, I have reviewed the draft and agree with it and the points of your
note.    The draft is ok to send from my perspective to the customer.  I will
hand carry the few minor comments that I had to your office.  I anticipate
that Mark and/or Kay will be the conduit for forwarding this agreement to the
Owner.

I suspect it makes sense for EECC, as part of the EPC effort, to procure,
arrange for others or assist the Owner with procuring the equipment.  How we
do it and what level of commitment will be a business issue for  ENA to
consider in the context of the overall project development effort and
subsequent contract negotiations.

With respect to the payment mechanism, I see this matter being worked out
during the contract negotiations.

Will let you know what I find out on the EECC NY licensing question.

Randy

	Robert Sevitz
	02/07/2001 02:11 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jude Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Coop City - Revised Contract Draft

Kay/Randy

Attached is the revised draft for your review.  Among other things, it
further moves the contract from international to domestic and addresses the
fully reimbursable basis and the differing responsibilities regarding
existing equipment.  I still have a few concerns regarding:

1. The equipment procurement mechanism, currently as agent for Owner.
2. The payment mechanism.  There is currently no down payment.

I have attempted to keep changes to a minimum.  Please call if you have any
questions about what I have done so far.  I would be happy to meet with you
to discuss any aspect of the document.


Tana:  You offered to send the TXU agreement for multiple confirms.  Thanks.
Sara


Anthony,

Thanks for the invitation. What about April 22? I have committed to different
speaking engagements, charities, off-sites etc. for all the Saturdays prior to
this date.

Vince

From: Anthony Mends@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/06/2000 02:18 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Invitation to My House

Vince,
I hope you are well. Sorry I have not been in touch but I have been swamped
trying to build my organization simultaneously as I endeavor to understand
EBS and navigate its political terrain. Quite interesting. I shall tell you
more later.
My wife, Elisabeth and I would love to have you for dinner at our house any
Saturday at you convenience. Would please let me  know which Saturday would
be suitable? We are both looking forward to it so please let me know.
Thanks,
Tony


Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David W Delainey                           07/10/2000 03:10 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Don
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect, Shelby
Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Pikofsky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tina
Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maxine E
Levingston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Deana Fortine/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: QBR East Midstream

Thank you for your prompt response.  I have arranged the following time and
date for the East Midstream QBR:

  Date:  August 16, 2000

  Time:  1:00 pm - 4:00 pm

  Location: 3321

  Topic:  East Midstream QBR

Please mark your calendar and plan to attend.

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643


Thank you for getting on board and helping make the ENA electronic newsletter
a success.  We look  forward to receiving your "Business Highlights" and/or
"Nuggets & Notes" for the upcoming newsletter.  The newsletter will not go
out this week because of the Thanksgiving Holiday.  We do plan on sending one
the following week.  The deadline for the next newsletter is noon, Wednesday,
November 29.

Hope to hear from you soon.
Michelle Vitrella & Kathie Grabstald


Daily Agenda
Thursday, May 10, 2001

Today's events...
* Noon, SACRAMENTO   Gov. Gray Davis signs energy bond bill, Capitol,
governor's council room. Contact: Steve Maviglio, 916-445-4571.
* Noon, SACRAMENTO   Assembly Republicans hold news conference to
discuss end of special session on energy, Capitol, room 125. Contact: James
Fisfis, 916-319-2005.

In the news...
* LA Times, Brooks: 60% rate hikes imposed by OUC.
http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010510/t000039441.html
* LA Times, Morain: Governor asks generators to compromise on debt.
http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010510/t000039413.html
* SD Union-Tribune, Haussler:
http://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/thu/news/news_1n10budget.html
* SF Chronicle, McManis: 15th District hopefuls line up.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/10/MNC112600.DTL

In committee...
* NATURAL GAS.  Energy Costs and Availability Subcommittee on Energy
Oversight.  Upon adjournment of Session, room 3162.  (Squawk Box 93.1)
* VARIOUS ITEMS.  Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Resources.  Upon call
of the Chair, room 127.  (Squawk Box 92.1)
* SCHOOL-TO-CAREER.  Select Committee on Workforce Investment.
3:00pm, room 126.  (Squawk Box 91.5)

Today on the floor...
* Assembly session at 8:30am.  (Squawk Box 89.7, Assembly TV, CH. 7)
* Senate session at 8:30am.  (Squawk Box 99.1, Senate TV, CH. 5)

The week ahead...

Friday - 5/11/01 Monday - 5/14/01 Tuesday --- 5/15/01
Wednesday - 5/16/01 Thursday - 5/17/01
Last day for policy committees to hear and report to the floor nonfiscal
Assembly bills Session @ 11:00am Senate Session @ 10:00am TBA TBA
Session @ 8:30am Senate Session @ 8:30am

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005


Hello everyone.  I was not invited to the Master Netting Agreement meeting today at 10 and just learned about it.  If this was an oversight, please add my name to the meeting list for next time.  Thanx.
 -----Original Message-----


print
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 09:16 AM -----

	Joe Hartsoe
	11/01/2000 11:14 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Order issued by FERC , EL00-95-000

----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000 11:12 AM -----

	"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
	11/01/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>,
<jhartso@enron.com>, <marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Order issued by FERC , EL00-95-000

The order issued from today's meeting is attached.  It is approximately 80
pages.

 - EL00-95.1


The merger agreement with Dynegy provides that subs of Dynegy merger with Enron with Enron being the surviving corporation.  Enron and Dynegy then would be subs of a newly incorporated holding company.

It might be more advantageous for a variety of reasons to do a structure in which Enron mergers with the ultimate publicly traded company (whether existing Dynegy or a new holding company) with that publicly traded company being the nominal survivor.  Under Delaware, Oregon, and most other states' law, the surviving company automatically would assume all of Enron's obligations as a matter of law, and the merger agreement would so provide if this structure were used.

Could you review the various change-of-control provisions that you've previoulsy identified to see if this structure--with Enron not being the technical survivor of the merger--makes any difference to  your conclusions about whether those provisions would be triggered?  Please respond to Rob Walls, Lance Schuler, Joe Henry, Peter del Vecchio and me.  Thanks.


I will be out the 19th but should be in the 20th.  Amy Felling should be your contact on the 19th.  She is most familiar with our computer systems.

The Enron North America offices are at 1200 17th St. Suite 2750 in Downtown Denver.
The office is over 9,000 Square Feet but is currently under construction in order to sublease approximately half of that space.
We currently have 6 employees.
I believe that you have copied all of the Enron offices that I know of.

The only other potential office is EOTT.

Let me know if you need anything else.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ringwelski, Mark
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	DuBose, Heidi; Jurgens, Kristen; Bierbach, Brian; Hurst, Lonnie; Comstock, Steve; Beers, Chad; Cigarroa, Gabriella
Subject:	Denver Visit

Mark, Brian, and Steve,
	Further to my conversation two weeks ago with Mark, I would like to schedule a visit to Denver 11/19-20.  As a reminder, Business Controls is looking at the security posture of Enron facilities worldwide.  Currently, we are focusing our resources on domestic sites.  At the moment, I am planning for one of our IT specialists to travel from Portland to assist me with reviewing IT back-up procedures, recovery, and continuity issues.  If I could impose on you to provide some information about the office, it would greatly help in our planning.
	In particular, could you briefly describe the office(s); physical location, which floor, how large, how many employees, and any other Enron subsidiaries or offices in Denver.  Additionally, would you be our point of contact, or can you designate someone?  Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.

Mark C. Ringwelski
Systems and Architecture
Business Controls
Enron Corporation
Phone: 713/345-4625
Cell:     713/875-1869
FAX:    713/646-8838


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has recommended CTXS (Long) at Nov 21 2001  2:47PM
	Citrix Systems (NASDAQ:CTXS)   Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  CTXS   20.65   2:58PM  0.48  21.05  20.14  3,812,800  Community Take   277 Long / 7 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Wed Nov 21 11:40:07 2001   CTXS as a speculative swing trade long.  CTXS definitive support at 18 3/4.  this line is drawn in.  probing for it here.  stop loss at 18.   sure the Mavs have been stinking it up bigtime having lost last night to the Sonics at home.  but taking the Mavs to beat charlotte on the road and giving up only 3 1/2 points is a lay-up as both Wesley and Mashburn are out.  the only scoring threats charlotte is gonna have is baron davis.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


Regarding the Brand Conference in San Francisco Aug. 13 -15,  here is the
flight information for Steve Kean and his wife, Melissa.

You had asked for this in case Cindy wants to travel at the same time.

Sunday, August 13    IAH   San Francisco

Continental # 1857    9:22 a.m.  11:18 a.m.

Tuesday, August 15    San Francisco IAH

Continental # 1651    3:00 p.m.  8:53 p.m.

Let me know if you need anything else.


Hi  Mark

Can you please respond to EOTT attorney Molly Sample. We need to determine
the corporaten structure that we are going to use before we can proceed
further. Thanks.

Savita
---------------------- Forwarded by Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron on 08/15/2000
11:29 AM ---------------------------

Charles_Uus@eott.com on 08/15/2000 11:28:12 AM
To: savita.puthigai@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Lawyers

Savita,

According to Molly Sample (my attorney) Mark Taylor still has not gotten
back to her.

It looks like we are still stuck.

Charles


Commercial Email Gets Results!

Interested in putting your product or service in front
of millions? To find out how READ ON.

My name is Paul Willis and I am one of the few who have
managed to make a very comfortable living marketing
products on the Internet. My methods and techniques have
been quoted in magazines, radio talk shows, the Nov. 27th
issue of the Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Post
just to name a few.

I have marketed everything on the Internet from
Personalized Baby Calendars to Information and have
made money with everything. Even the Wall Street Journal
referred to me as being crafty in my techniques that have
out maneuvered the anti commerce radicals since 1995.

How?

By placing your ad over the Internet and directly into
the mailboxes of consumers who, like you, have an Internet
e-mail address.  Almost every user of the Internet has an
e-mail address and we can effectively reach as many of
those people as you want FAST and EFFECTIVELY.

Every year the number of users increases tremendously
creating a huge market. Why not become part of this
unlimited market by placing your personal ad in one of
the largest consumer databases?

We are interested in doing business with you, however,
we DO NOT do pornography, chain letters, or schemes of any
kind. Please call us with a legitimate product or service.

Some of you may not be interested at all, and possibly
are agitated by our message. We will respectfully remove
you from our list by request. We are responsible
commercial e-mailers and don't want to bother those who
are not interested. We not only respect you, but also our
customers. We do not want our customers spending their
advertising dollars on prospects that do not have any
interest.

(Remove instructions are at the end of this letter.)

Below you will find basic mailing options we are offering
at this time. Check out our October SPECIALS!

LIMITED TIME OFFER:

DISCOUNTED MONTHLY COMMERCIAL E-MAIL ACCOUNTS

We are now offering the following Discounted Monthly
Accounts. We have recently increased our capabilities
by adding two new Servers and are offering the following
Discounted Accounts.

LITE ACCOUNT: We send 250,000 Emails once a month
with a maximum of 2 different sales letters and supply you
with a pop3 to receive your replies. The Lite account is
ideal for someone with a single product line who wants to
keep a light but dependable increase to their web site.
$200.00 per month.

INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNT: We send 500,000 Emails with a
maximum of 4 different sales letters or products and
supply you with a pop3 account to receive your replies.
The Intermediate will allow you to market 4 separate
products. Perfect for a company with more than one product
who wishes to increase their Web Site hit count.
$375 per month.

PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNT: We send 1,000,000 Emails with a
maximum of 6 different Sales letters or products and
supply you with a pop3 account to receive your replies.
The Professional will allow you to Market 6 separate
products. $575 per month.

*Specials are only valid on orders placed thru 10/30/01

Call us at (661) 252-6028 or (661) 244-4903 to discuss
which option best meets your needs. We do mailing for many
customers, so if you get our voice mail, please leave your
Name, Phone Number & the best time to reach you and we will
return your call shortly.

ONE-TIME MAILING PRICES:

250,000 e-mails for US $285.00     *$225.00
500,000 e-mails for US $500.00     *$425.00
1 Million e-mails for US $900.00   *$625.00

Targeted Mailings:

We can supply target market addresses by: City, State, Zip
Code, Business Opportunities, Network Marketing, Specific
Industries...You name it! All Targeted Mailings must be
ordered Two Days prior to Mailing Date. Call For Target
& Quantity Quote!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to be removed from our mailing list,
please click on the link below. Be sure removeme is in
subject line.
MailTo:pet4621@excite.comSubject=takemeoff


Please Disregard this email... This is just a test of our email delivery system

Thanks,
Weather Team


Thank you Victor.  I deleted the demand charges on the duplicate deal, #139693.

Thanks

Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:53 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Ring, Andrea; Hodge, John; Chavez, Alejandra
Cc:	Collins, Joann; Loocke, Kelly; Homco, Meredith; Allwein, Robert; Garcia, Clarissa
Subject:	Deal 139693

Kam/Alejandra,  This deal should probably be zero effective Nov 2001.  I believe it's a dupe to 139683 on CGAS..Volumes now are zero on 139693.  It's a sale to Hopewell that was created in December 1999 but it has a hedge N59964 and a demand charge attached to it that should be taken out.  THANKS


Refer him to me

	Linda R Guinn
	01/29/2001 05:52 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Richard--

Have you spoken w/Alan regarding these invoices as you indicated you wanted
to?  Please advise as to how you want me to handle this matter.  I will not
respond to Alan until I have heard from you.

Linda Guinn
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6104
(713) 646-3393 (fax)

----- Forwarded by Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 05:55 PM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	01/29/2001 03:05 PM

		 To: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

I believe I had sent to you a reply earlier this month to your memo to me
regarding how to allocate the outstanding inovice to cost centers (e.g., mine
or Richard's). In my reply, I indicated that I thought that since all of the
work done by Watson Farley in the attached invoice was in anticipation of an
arbitration, the bill should be paid from the litigation RC. If you would
like to discuss, please let me know.

Please confirm that the invoice has been or will be paid soon. Thanks for
your help.

Regards, Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 03:00 PM -----

	Angeline Poon
	01/29/2001 12:43 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Hi Alan

The legal invoices for Watson Farley and Clyde & Co are still outstanding.
I would be grateful if you could please advise how we should proceed from
here.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Kind regards,
Angie

---------------------- Forwarded by Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT on 01/29/2001 02:30
PM ---------------------------

Joya Williams
01/06/2001 05:40 AM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

This invoice was given to Richard Sanders for processing.  Claudia Meraz
handles processing of his invoices and can provide Angeline Poon and Matt
Lee  with an update.

Claudia:

Please advise.

Thanks.

Joya' F. Williams, Sr. Admin. Assistant
EGM Legal Department
1400 Smith St., EB3855A
Houston, Texas  77002
joya.williams@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 (direct dial)
(713) 646-4842 (fax)

	Alan Aronowitz
	12/27/2000 10:33 AM

		 To: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Joya:

Please handle the processing of this invoice. Thanks.

Alan

Angeline Poon
12/20/2000 01:11 AM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Hi Alan

A copy of Watson Farley's bill has already been faxed to Joya on 2 November
2000 and Linda Guinn on 11 December 2000.

Angie

From: Alan Aronowitz on 12/20/2000 01:02 AM
To: Joya Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Joya:

I would like you to handle the bill Matt is speaking about.

Matt/Angeline: Please forward to Joya for our further handling.

Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 11:01 AM -----

Matthias Lee
12/15/2000 07:43 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Alan

Would appreciate if you could help with the processing of WFW's bill. The
bill is not small, but not unexpected. I've spent quite a lot of time
reviewing it with Neale and already expended quite a bit of goodwill between
us to get the bill reduced. We shouldn't delay payment further.

Thanks for your help.
Matt

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 12/16/2000 09:37
AM ---------------------------

Matthias Lee
12/16/2000 09:39 AM
To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias
Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Britt

I have sat with Neale Gregson to review WFW's bill and confirmed that it does
not include independent FGH work. Although I have found the bill in order, I
negotiated for WFW to reduce the bill by S$5,000 based on Enron Singapore's
goodwill with WFW.

Regards
Matt

From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 12/16/2000 05:34 AM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Matt,

This will follow up on my recent e-mail regarding the substantial initial
bill from WFW.  Given my statement to Richard that I thought a substantial
portion of that bill related to resolving the FGH issue, Richard has asked me
to review and apportion that  bill between his R/C and Alan's R/C.  Subject
to Richard and Alan's thoughts, however, I wonder if it makes more sense to
ask Neale Gregson to do that for us, given that he was the one that spent the
time.

I await your response.

Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/15/2000 03:31 PM -----

	Britt Davis
	11/01/2000 11:30 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Alan and Matt, I have reviewed David Best's bill and find it in order.  I
recommend that it be placed in line for payment as well.

Britt

	Alan Aronowitz@ECT
	10/31/2000 09:40 PM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Joya:

Please process this payment. I think we will be charging it to the Litigation
RC. Please check with Twanda/Richard to confirm this.

Thanks, Alan

	Matthias Lee
	10/31/2000 09:24 PM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Alan / Britt

I shall be forwarding WFW's bill (which includes PacMarine's bill) to Houston
(for Joya Davis' attention) for payment of a reduced sum (SGD112,000 for
WFW's legal fees). A credit note will be issued to us upon payment.

Britt - I don't have any comments on Clyde & Co's bill. If you are OK with
it, I'll similarly forward thier bill to Joya to process payment. Please let
me know.

Thanks and regards
Matt

Matthias Lee
10/31/2000 05:51 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Further to my earlier note, the rest of WFW's bill is for PacMarine's costs
(SGD18,827.35 reduced from an earlier SGD25,000) which I also think is fair
and reasonable.

Regards
Matt

Matthias Lee
10/31/2000 05:46 PM
To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Pacific Virgo - Legal Fees

Alan / Britt

I met with Neale Gregson this afternoon to discuss WFW's bill. We went
through the bill item by item and I am satisfied that it is fair given the
amount of work actually done. It is nevertheless  a hefty bill, so I did ask
Neale for some accomodation. He has agreed to reduce the charges from
SGD120,000 to SGD112,000. I should be xpecting a credit note from WFW. I
trust this is acceptable to you as well. Please let me know.

Regards
Matt


Just in case worse comes to worse.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 11:29 AM ---------------------------
From:	Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/21/2001 10:39 AM
To:	Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Imbalance gas

Mary we just have two.  Thanks - Julie

contract 012-87794-02-001 (delivery)
meter 981506
we owe them 21,771

981244 (delivery) Koch Refinery
we owe them 16,810


OK.  I'll take a shot in answering your questions, Steve. Others are free to
comment as well.

The transmission issues in the ISO are greatly lessened.  If you talk to the
traders, they LOVE it.  Before April1, 1998, they had no sales to CA.  Now,
they have millions of dollars of sales.  Why?  -- no transmission access to
speak of before the ISO took over.

We still have some problems, however.  The problems have been there since day
one and FERC has punted on them.  We have a huge FERC case dealing with many
of them.  We also appealed a stupid FERC order on Path 15 probably at least a
year ago and have heard nothing from FERC on it. The traders have also
seriously considered a FERC complaint on Path 15.

So, what are the access issues?

Path 15 is the major constraint point between northern and southern CA.  Has
been for years. The transmission fix is basically adding a third intertie
line between Tracy and Tesla. When I left PG&E in 1996, the estimated coast
was $300 million.  The congestion costs did not justify building the line
then.

PG&E continues to control Path 15 and tells the ISO what's left after PG&E
allocates the capacity and decides what the rating is and when it changes.
There is no transparency.  PG&E has the ability to use Path 15 to advantage
Diablo Canyon given the existing contracts.  Carl has looked into it somewhat
and doesn't think PG&E is, but;... The ISO says it can't interpret PG&E's
contracts with the munis and filed some funky thing with FERC about how it's
some kind of overseer -- we protested and have now appealed.  The munis have
been receiving preferential access since Day One -- their contracts were
generally subservient to the IOU rights -- more like interruptible -- but
once the ISO started, all of a sudden, the muni rights became super firm
superceding the IOU rights (as far as we can tell from sketchy filings and
discussions with ISO staff). That's why we have pushed the issue.  Also,
Dynegy and Power Exchange (not the PX) have rights on Path 15.  Tim Belden
would love to get some info on how that constaint is being operated.

Information in general is pretty sketchy on real-time transmission.  We have
complained to the ISO about how the ISO knows what's going on in transmission
(as do the utilities), changes what it does, which then changes prices, and
then doesn't tell us until after the fact.  The ISO has promised to do
better, but I don't think has implemented any real changes yet.

Advantageous access.

Except for what's going on in Path 15, I don't think the IOUs have any
advantages on access -- except with respect to Regulatory Must Run resources
like nuclear and hydro -- but I think it's resource specific, rather than
owner specific. The munis are another story.  See next item.

Munis Preference

This is a huge issue here and I assume across the country.  In making a
devil's bargain with the munis, the FERC has put the ISO into an untenable
situation.  The "sanctity of contracts" under any and all conditions has
created preference for incumbents (not the IOUs -- but everyone who had a
transmission contract with the IOUs) and poor rights for those poor schlepps
like us who have come into the new market.  The ISO cannot operate the system
this way and is forced to give the munis/Dynegy more than they had originally
and to let them do things no one else can do (e.g., some munis get to change
their schedule after the actrive hour begins, some get to do it every half
hour, so far most haven't had to pay for ancillary services, etc.)

There are many, many examples of how we are discriminated against (in
addition to Path 15) and of how FERC has shined us on -- but yet we fight on.
The most recent muni giveaway is the litigation surrounding the "new"
transmission charge for CA -- into this has been entangled the rules for
munis joining the ISO.  The munis want huge handouts to join. And part of the
"new" T rate includes hundreds of millions of subsidies for munis -- I've
pointed out that this amounts to the IOU's customers paying for the munis'
stranded transmission costs, when they are already paying for the IOUs'
stranded generation costs, but this argument fell on deaf ears in the ISO.
It's really not our issue, but it does make you kind of sick about where
public policy stands in this state.

Feel free to call (415) 782-7802

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 07:43 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed away
from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its ISO and
PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other parts of the
country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in priorities for
utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path 15"?  Does that
control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there other examples and
are there links between these "preferences" and the current problems in
California?  As we are trying to convert reliability and pricing concerns
into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to have available to us.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Meeting to discuss Non-Grid AM Process attendees (Julia, Lynn, Steve, Sheila & Jerry) conference room 4102.

Date:		9/15/2000
Time:		1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 11:56
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
10/24/2000 11:51 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Bob,

Here's a November preliminary updated file.

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
11:50 AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
10/23/2000 04:42 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Bob,

Please see the attached file estimating wellhead production for the month of
November.  Please be advised that this is a preliminary estimate as to this
date, we have received no noms for November and there may be revisions from
the traders.  I will update you with any revisions as they occur.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 08, 2000 5:00pm through December 11, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: HR   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: UNIX     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: REMEDY
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  RmailSniffer
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Review of Mail logs has shown that between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
50% of mail messages fail.  The update will copy failed messages to another
directory for an admin to process.
Backout: Reset RmailSniffer service to original settings.
Contact(s):  Carlos Perez    713-345-708
  Christian Smerz   713-345-7410

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Farmland DDVC-(Randy, Lynn, Larry) conference room 4194.

Date:		9/5/2000
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:15 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Simmons/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
10:39 AM ---------------------------

Michael Simmons
12/06/2000 10:43 AM
To: Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Schwarzbach/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Webb Jennings/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Flag Football

Update:

The aggies have played and are awaiting a UT team challenger.    I think the
only thing at stake here is the trophy and I don't know what there is terms
of ref's, a field, etc.

If you would like to field a team to play the aggies, lemme know.   Webb has
informed me that he does not have enough players and thus there will be no
playoff for the Enron Texas team.  We can still put a team together by
combining those of you who would like to play.  Otherwise, I think Texas made
it's case after Thanksgiving and I'm not going to pursue this any further..

-Mike  ext 37842

--
Webb, where are you as far as setting up a time with the aggies?    I think
this weekend, either Saturday or Sunday is as good as any.  If not this
weekend, you will need to organize this as I will be on vacation for the next
two weeks.


Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save(R) E-mail Update for
November 7, 2000

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. Click 'n Save Internet Specials
II. Announcing! E-mail Itinerary
III. Other Promotions and Special Offers
IV.  Click 'n Save Subscriber Information
V. SWABIZ - Company Online Booking and Tracking

********* SOUTHWEST.COM ONLY SPECIALS *********

I.  Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials.

*21-day advance purchase
*Travel November 28, 2000 through March 30, 2001,
 except for December 22,  23, 26, 29, 30, 2000,
 and January 1, 2001.
*Purchase beginning November 7 through
 November 9, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*Click 'n Save Internet Specials may be combined with
all other fares. When combining with other fares, the
most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
once purchased will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Scroll down for more details!

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.
Fares shown are each way.

Albany, NY
 $68 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $69 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Albuquerque, NM
 $36 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $36 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Amarillo, TX
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $62 each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $99 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Austin, TX
 $39 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $42 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $34 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield, CT
 $34 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $61 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 $99 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Birmingham, AL
 $56 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Boise, ID
 $36 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $63 each way to/from Oakland, CA

Buffalo, NY
 $48 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $65 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Burbank, CA
 $37 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $44 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Chicago, IL Midway
 $34 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $35 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $64 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $99 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Cleveland, OH
 $34 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $99 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Columbus, OH
 $45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $61 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 $99 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $99 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Dallas, TX Love Field
 $36 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $36 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $36 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $48 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Detroit, MI
 $42 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $54 each way to/from Nashville, TN

El Paso, TX
 $36 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $36 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $40 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $99 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $39 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $69 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Hartford/Springfield, CT
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $65 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Houston, TX Hobby
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $68 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Indianapolis, IN
 $36 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $68 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Jackson, MS
 $64 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $99 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 each way to/from Providence, RI

Jacksonville, FL
 $56 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $70 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $99 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield, CT

Kansas City, MO
 $99 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $99 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Las Vegas, NV
 $47 each way to/from Sacramento, CA
 $99 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 each way to/from Spokane, WA
 $99 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $99 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Little Rock, AR
 $99 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $99 each way to/from Manchester, NH

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30 each way to/from Providence, RI
 $99 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Los Angeles, CA
 $37 each way to/from San Jose, CA
 $48 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Louisville, KY
 $34 each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $61 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $70 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Lubbock, TX
 $40 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Manchester, NH
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $99 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $40 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $42 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $52 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $52 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental

Nashville, TN
 $54 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $65 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield, CT
 $66 each way to/from Tulsa, OK
 $99 each way to/from San Diego, CA

New Orleans, LA
 $48 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $99 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $99 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Oakland, CA
 $37 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $63 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $63 each way to/from Tucson, AZ
 $99 each way to/from Omaha, NE

Oklahoma City, OK
 $55 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $55 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $69 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Omaha, NE
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 each way to/from Oakland, CA

Ontario, CA
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 each way to/from Amarillo, TX

Orlando, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $61 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $65 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $99 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $36 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $36 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $99 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Portland, OR
 $42 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $55 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Providence, RI
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $99 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $99 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $45 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $48 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $99 each way to/from Austin, TX

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $42 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $44 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $57 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Sacramento, CA
 $47 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $53 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $36 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $48 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $55 each way to/from Portland, OR

San Antonio, TX
 $62 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 each way to/from Providence, RI

San Diego, CA
 $99 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99 each way to/from Seattle, WA

San Francisco, CA
 $99 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

San Jose, CA
 $37 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $46 each way to/from Seattle, WA

Seattle, WA
 $34 each way to/from Spokane, WA
 $46 each way to/from San Jose, CA
 $99 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Spokane, WA
 $34 each way to/from Seattle, WA
 $53 each way to/from Sacramento, CA
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

St. Louis, MO
 $34 each way to/from Louisville, KY
 $35 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $36 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $42 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $68 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

Tampa Bay, FL
 $61 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $61 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $69 each way to/from Albany, NY

Tucson, AZ
 $57 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $63 each way to/from Oakland, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $66 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 each way to/from San Francisco, CA

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel.
Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may be combined with
all other fares. When combining with other fares, the
most restrictive fare rules apply. Seats are limited
and won't be available on some flights that operate
during very busy travel times and holiday periods.

Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
once purchased will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Reservations
or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/

********* ANNOUNCING! E-MAIL ITINERARY***********
II. Let them know you're on your way! E-mail your itinerary
to up to four friends on your next purchase or retrieve
existing ticketless reservations and send copies now.
After you have purchased your Ticketless Travel online,
you may retrieve your itinerary and email it out, visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/retrieveItinerary.html

***OTHER PROMOTIONS AND SPECIAL OFFERS***
III. Take your team to the Super Bowl!
Win a trip for you and ten (10) friends to Super Bowl XXXV
in Tampa, Florida on January 28, 2001
http://www.southwest.com/special_offers/  and click on
Promotions.

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

************************** SWABIZ *************************
V. Company Travel Managers can book and track
their company's business travel on SWABIZ. To find
out more about this FREE service, simply visit:
http://www.southwest.com/swabiz/

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [mark.guzman@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-99566240O@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Facility Planning approves an amendment to WTG contract # 27420, as follows:

SHIPPER:		WTG Gas Marketing, Inc.
CONTRACT:		27420
TERM:			02/01/01 thru 11/30/01
REC. PT/VOLUME:	POI 58647 (Panhandle Pool) 1,932 Dth/d
DEL. PT/VOLUME:	POI 16540 (West Tx Gas/TW Winkler West Texas) 1,932 Dth/d

Dale Eldridge
01/29/2001 02:27 PM
To:	Perry Frazier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Dale Eldridge/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Cormier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Amendment #2

SHIPPER:		WTG Gas Marketing, Inc.
CONTRACT:		27420
TERM:			02/01/01 thru 11/30/01
REC. PT/VOLUME:	POI 58647 (Panhandle Pool) 1,932 Dth/d
DEL. PT/VOLUME:	POI 16540 (West Tx Gas/TW Winkler West Texas) 1,932 Dth/d


Attached are the Professional Services Agreement and the associated Tasking
Letter.  Please review.


Per our conversation, here is the model that I have for Simon.  The notes
that I gave you were from some work I did back in September as I was looking
for volume numbers.  The notes show what drives the final cash flow numbers.

 Briefly, the issue surrounds exactly what is meant by nonmarket and
noncredit risk.   Ideally, this would be anything that effects NPV of the
deal.  However, I think that we should limit ourselves to those things that
effect the time and amount of the EAM volumes.  Even here, such a problem set
is quite large.  If you glance at the spreadsheet model, you will notice that
there exists a large number of possible items that effect the EAM volumes.
If we are to do this rigorously, then it is necessary to tear apart EES's
business model, and although such an attempt to do so would be noble, the
scope of such an excercise may be too large.  We need a clear definition of
EES Operational Risk.

 Briefly, from the EES deals that I have looked at, two things drive their
profit:  a long term bet that power prices will go down, and that we can
improve the facility through various enhancements.  Each of these may be
gleaned from the spreadsheet, as well as the assumptions regarding the
funding of the facility improvements and so on.  95% of the savings is
assumed to come from power, and 5% from gas.  (The effeciency gain may not be
explicitly given).  If we have data that show the realized efficiency gains,
then it would be simple [in principle] to determine a distribution, and hence
a distribution of EAM volumes, NPV's, etc.  At this time, I understand that
RAC has determined some of the realized efficiency gains, but my knowledge is
quite sketchy.  Jay Hachen may have more info.

 If I get a chance, I will try to see if I can do a "proof of concept"
excercise, but I have a late January deadline on something else.

 Another point:  even if we are successful in doing this for the spreadsheet
model, EES has chosen to book things differently.  I do not have a thorough
understanding of their IT systems, but at least in principle, if we can do
this for the spreadsheet model, then we can do it in their IT environment
(data are data are data).  They may book efficiency gains through improvement
type, such as gains due to compressors, chillers, boilers, etc.  If this is
indeed the case, then we need to have distributions for each type of
improvement.

 If we are successful on the spreadsheet and not successful with their IT
systems, then the other alternative is to build our own reporting system.  It
would be similar to a database where the recordsets are replaced by Excel
workbooks.  It can be constructed in such a way as to enable us to run
simulations and queries, but this would probably take me about five or six
weeks.

 Finally, Don Hawkins does Operational Audits for Enron's physical assets.
He sends out teams to audit our pipelines and strategic assets.  I don't
think that he does it for EES, but you might want to give him a call anyway.

-Kevin K.

PS:  The EES lunch meeting has been moved to Wednesdays.  Jay Hachen will
know more.


Greetings!
We still have good seats available in this excellent cross discipline
course. Please pass this notice on to employees in your company on
multidisciplinary teams who need this training to communicate knowledgeably
with their peers.  Or, if you need a refresher in some engineering concepts,
we'd be happy to have you join us.

Please complete the attached registration form and fax it to us by Tuesday,
9/04. FAX:  713-789-6886. Or you may visit our website and register:
www.scacompanies.com.

Petroleum Engineering for the Geoscientist
Instructor: Hines Austin

Date:           September 10-13, 2001 (Monday-Thursday)

Location:               SCA Training Center  Houston  8:00 a.m.  5:00 p.m.
                        2500 Tanglewilde, Suite 120A

Petroleum Engineering for the Geoscientist covers basic petroleum
engineering in laymen s terms and provides basic techniques for evaluating
reserve potential. The course introduces the geoscientist and other
non-petroleum engineering disciplines to comparative, performance and
volumetric evaluation techniques. The attendee works with and determines the
information required to elevate oil and gas volumes and performance.

The basis of the course is the emphasis on the work sessions that supplement
the lectures. Work sessions represent over 40% of the course time. This
course is a must for geoscientists involved with multidisciplinary teams.
The aim is to enable the geoscientist to recognize the contribution of data
obtained from different disciplines and to perform basic reserve
evaluations.

Who should attend?
Geologists, geophysicists, technicians, beginning petroleum engineers and
those who require a basic understanding of petroleum engineering.

Course Content
" Comparative Evaluation
" Performance Evaluation
" Drive Mechanisms
" Material Balance
" Recovery Factors
" Fluid Properties
" Volumetric Evaluations
" Pressure and Temperature
" Log Evaluations
" Rock Properties
" Mapped Volumes
" Economic Analysis

Tuition:  $1000
        Look forward to meeting you soon!

Pat Geary
Training Operations Manager
Subsurface Consultants
& Assoc.,  LLC. (SCA)
Ph: 713.789.2444
Fx: 713.789.6886
www.scacompanies.com

Amy Schram
Marketing Manager
Subsurface Consultants & Associates
2500 Tanglewilde, Suite 120
Houston, Tx  77063
713.789.2444
713.789.4449 fax


Equity Trading is requesting an Executing Broker Agreement be set up for ECT
Investments, Inc. and Enron North America Corp with Deutsche Bank
Securities.  We do not have one currently in place and we have done a
significant amount of business with them in 2000  (included in top 10 for
8/2000 YTD in brokerage commissions).
Thanks. Sheila


Jeff,

Thought you might appreciate this.

Kevin


This is the last edition of the Deregulation Highlights report.  The
subscriber list has grown from 100 to the present 265 and I thank you for all
the positive comments.
Frank


Pursuant to this request, I am forwarding this e-mail from Kay Chapman, Dave
Delainey's assistant.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 10:50 AM -----

	Kay Chapman
	09/25/2000 10:48 AM

		 To: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Floor Talk

Would you please pass this on to your assistants to let them know about the
floor talk. If this is a bad day, please feel free to let me know.

As a result of feedback from employee surveys, and a desire to create
informal opportunities for Q&A and discussions around our business,  over the
next few weeks the ENA Office of the Chairman will be hosting floor talks.

Dave Delainey
will give the first of these sessions
on
Wednesday September 27, 2000
10:00-10:30
on the 38th floor

Format: 1. "This Was The Month That Was"
 2. The Month ahead
 3. Q&A  - Please think of any questions you would like to ask Dave during
the Q&A session.
  If you would prefer to pre-submit you question, please send to Kay Chapman
via email.


Would you send a draft copy of our Confidentiality Agreement to the Texas General Land Office via email by Tuesday, September 11. Here is the information:

Texas General Land Office
Stephen F. Austin Building
1700 North Congress Avenue, Suite 640
Attn: In-Kind-Marketing
Austin, Texas 78701-1495

Attn: J. David Hall

Please email to:

david.hall@glo.state.tx.us
richard.bone@glo.state.tx.us

If you have any questions, please contact me at X36784.


Hey Mark!
Here is (FINALLY) the long awaited...true you probably
weren't dying for it.. but here we are anyway- I'm
emailing you! So hows life in Oregon? things are doing
okay here. had kind of crazy/crappy weekend, but it
happens. Anyway-I'm hoping will be able to get
together this week while you are in town. Of course I
have work wed- sun- the whole time your here, but I
was going to try to see if I could get either wed,
thurs, or sunday off if it works for you and we can
hang. Unfortunately I wasn't able to email you until
now and the week came too quick so it is hard to plan
much, but if your busy I totally understand and I just
hope will be able to hook up for a bit. If one day is
better than the other email me or give me a call. I'll
just search on my end to see if I can get any of them
covered. I hope everythings going okay on your end. I
miss you and can't waitto see you. Talk soon. And lets
try to get these emails going.
Lots of love,
Lisa

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


Jan,

Here's a chart that may help you explain our proposal to "non-industry"
people.  Call if you have any questions.  Good luck!

Dave