Works for me.  I'll come up at 1.

Regards,

Heather

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

I am available at 1 pm.  Let me know if that still works for you.

	Heather Kroll
	03/04/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Let's meet tomorrow to discuss these contracts.  We need to put this issue to
bed fairly soon.  Are you available at 1:00?

Regards,

Heather

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather,  I did receive the Ash Handling Agreement from Bill White and I am
reviewing and should have comments shortly.  I  have not received the Coal
Handling Agreement yet from Kris' attorney.

	Heather Kroll
	02/27/2001 03:26 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Please give me an update on the redrafting of the ReUse agreements.  I
thought you told me that their attorneys were drafting, but from this e-mail
I don't think Kris Johnson is aware of that.  Please follow up with their
attorneys and let me know when to expect a new draft.

Regards,

Heather Kroll
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 04:24
PM ---------------------------

"Johnson, Kris" <KrisJohnson@Cogentrix.com> on 02/27/2001 02:51:36 PM
To: "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather:

Please give me a quick update on the status of the Lumberton and
Elizabethtown coal and ash contracts from Enron's perspective.  Are we still
shooting for a March 15th closing date.  As of now I will out of town on the
15th, but reachable.

Thanks, hope all is going well.

Kris Johnson
1-800-827-3873, ext. 105


Mark,

David Portz, Elizabeth Sager and I were looking at this slide and we're not
so sure it's correct.  We think it should reflect two huge power price
spikes, the recent ones of this year, and the big one of last year.  We don't
think the attached slide correctly reflects the two price spikes.  Can you
take a look at it and get back to me...thanks for your help!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/14/99 04:49 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David Portz                           09/14/99 04:34 PM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price Volatility Graph

forwarding graph received earlier this week...
---------------------- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 09/14/99 03:55 PM
---------------------------
From: Sayed Khoja on 09/10/99 01:47 PM
To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price Volatility Graph

David,

Attached is the graph I mentioned in my voice mail.  Please let me know if
you need anything else.

Sayed


Mr Yang has re-appeared.  Works for MRW not MWR.

Alan
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 04/13/2001 06:44
PM ---------------------------

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 04/13/2001 12:43:00 PM
To: "Alan Comnes (E-mail)" <acomnes@enron.com>, "Alex Makler (E-mail)"
<AlexM@calpine.com>, "Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>,
"Bill Adams (E-mail)" <sangorgon@aol.com>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Bob Ellery (E-mail)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bob
Escalante (E-mail)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Brian T. Cragg (E-mail)"
<bcragg@gmssr.com>, "Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"Charles Johnson (E-mail)" <c.johnson@ejgd.com>, "David Parquet (E-mail)"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "Doug Levitt (E-mail)" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Duane
Nelsen (E-mail)" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Ed Tomeo (E-mail)"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Edward Lozowicki (E-mail)"
<elozowicki@sjo.coudert.com>, "'Eric Edstrom'" <eric.edstrom@elpaso.com>,
"Graeme Donaldson (E-mail)" <GDonald386@aol.com>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott
(E-mail)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Janet Heck-Doyle (E-mail)"
<jheckdoyle@aol.com>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Costanzo
(E-mail)" <jacostanzo@aol.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Kassandra Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Kate
Castillo (E-mail)" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)"
<kellyl@enxco.com>, "Ken Hoffman (E-mail)" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Kent Burton (E-mail)" <kburton@covantaenergy.com>, "Mark Fillinger (E-mail)"
<mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Marty McFadden (E-mail)"
<mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Mike Hawkins (E-mail)"
<hawkins@2000energy.com>, "Milton Schultz (E-mail)" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>,
"Paula Soos (E-mail)" <psoos@covantaenergy.com>, "Phil Reese (E-mail)"
<rcsc@west.net>, "Rachel King (E-mail)" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "'Rand
Havens '" <rhavens@coral-energy.com>, "Rich Dyer (E-mail)"
<rich_dyer@covantaenergy.com>, "Robert Frees (E-mail)" <freesrj@apci.com>,
"'Robert Henderson'" <robert.henderson@elpaso.com>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Ross Ain (E-mail)" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"Scott Harlan (E-mail)" <harlans@epenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Tandy McMannes (E-mail)" <mcmannes@aol.com>, "Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail)" <tcortopassi@covantaenergy.com>, "Thomas Heller
(E-mail)" <hellertj@apci.com>, "'Timothy Peters'"
<timothy.peters@elpaso.com>, "Tom Hartman (E-mail)" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>,
"Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond Aschehoug (E-mail)"
<norway@mindsync.com>, "William Carlson (E-mail)" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "William
Hall (E-mail)" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>
cc: "Andy Brown (E-mail)" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Carol Hudson (E-mail)'"
<carol@iepa.com>, "Douglas Kerner (E-mail)" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Katie Kaplan (E-mail)'"
<kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Steven Kelly (E-mail)'" <steven@iepa.com>

Subject: FW: Memo on SCE/DWR MOU

Attached for your information are the results of the MWR study assessing the
Impact of the SCE-DWR MOU on Payments for past debt.  This study was
requested from the QF/Renewable Committee during our last cc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Yang [mailto:ryy@mrwassoc.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 6:21 PM
To: Steven@iepa.com; RunWithMee@aol.com
Cc: RBW
Subject: Memo on SCE/DWR MOU

Steve and Doug,

Attached is the memo you requested regarding the SCE/DWR MOU and the impact
on SCE's ability to pay its past debts and future bills.

Call me at 510-834-1999 if you have any questions.

Roger

 - SCE DWR MOU.doc


The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for  7/1 the
following
day(s) as listed .    There are three worksheets labelled as follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\May_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'Comments':   Contains comments on selected items on various days.

Hans Herzog
ph: 703 561 6331
fax: 703 561 7317

 - 07-01-00 daily volsAM.xls


When: Monday, April 16, 2001 4:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

1. Contractors
2. Pulse Survey program and recommendations (Frank)
3. Orientation Program


In addition to World Markets Energy information  <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket.asp>
 and Country Analysis and Forecasting, <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_CountryAnalysis.asp>

eSource now offers free access to World Markets - Regulatory Analysis

World Markets Regulatory Analysis offers:

		Daily Reports - Legal, regulatory and policy developments in 185 countries. Comprehensive monitoring of legislative, regulatory and policy
 			changes for each country
		Email Alerts -  Automatic daily email alerts of current and impending legal, regulatory and policy changes affecting the development of markets
		Daily Analysis - Same-day in-depth assessment of the impact of legal developments by in-house analysts. Features detailed analysis of key legal
			changes written exclusively for Regulatory Analysis by a unique network of legal experts in more than 180 countries
		Country Reports - Assessments of the legal systems in 185 countries, including rules on establishing a business and restrictions on foreign investors

		Access World Markets Regulatory Analysis:  http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_regulatory.asp

										***

		For additional new products and reports, visit eSource's Hot Topics page at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp


This deal (#227738) was booked in our system on Jan 17th.  According to my
notes, this is an "unwind" for AK Steel.  It was done as a physical fixed
price deal and it goes through September.  The volume is 5,000 per month for
April through August and 20,000 per month for September.

CES sold the physical gas back to ENA.  The only gas CES has are the Exhibit
1 volumes.  So I created a sell (#226553) to CES for the same volume at a
price of IF CGAS + $.0075.

The deal numbers for March are 157559 and 205228.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/03/2000 06:57:54 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Simien, Ernie" <esimien@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis,
Kara" <kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Contos, Richard"
<rcontos@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>
Subject: Invoice Question

Chris--There is a recurring set of monthly transactions on ENA's invoices that
I don't recognize.  Perhaps you can help me understand what they are.   In
each
case, CES is invoiced for purchasing approximately 4,000 to 5,000 Dth/month at
TCO pool at an IF TCO Appl index price.   The Sitara # for this transaction is
SA-226553.  Then, this same monthly volume is re-purchased by ENA at a fixed
price.  The Sitara # for the "buy-back" is SA-227738.

Do these transactions have something to do with the physical gas that we have
purchased from ENA for our retail customer retention activities?

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Attached is the executable Agency and Management Agreement Document.  Please
print out and execute and fax back to Barry for ENA's execution.  We will fax
back a fully executed copy.  Please note that as we discussed, two of the
gentlemen listed in Mexicana  de Cobre's power of attorney must execute.

Will will follow up with hardcopy orginals for execution with all the
exhibits in the mail or delivered by Barry.  Thank You.


Michelle -

We are getting lots of comments/questions from our employees regarding the mandatory harassment training.

Have you given any more thought as to when/how this will be rolled out to Portland and San Francisco?

Thanks!  Hope that you had a great weekend.
Amy


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
12:39 PM ---------------------------

"Iaconetti, Louis" <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com> on 09/25/2000 11:26:38 AM
To: "Don Miller (E-mail)" <Don.Miller@enron.com>, "'Benjamin Rogers'"
<Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
cc: "Bartlett, James" <james.bartlett@csfb.com>, "Al-Farisi, Omar"
<omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Modi, Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com>, "Heckler,
James" <james.heckler@csfb.com>
Subject: Additional Questions

I received a call from Tom Favinger at PG&E today.  He is looking for the
responses to his questions from last week and also has a new question.  He
would like to get a breakout of the $10.25 million item in the Pastoria
capital budget labeled Pre-Commercial Operations Costs.

I also spoke to Darryn O Llegas from PECO today.  They are planning to bid
on the peakers and LV Cogen on Friday.  His questions are:

Peakers

* Will Enron's control area dispatching/scheduling software be
included in the property conveyed with the peakers?
* Do the Peaker's permits make any allowance for combined cycle
operation or would they need to re-start the permitting process?
* They would like clarification concerning the joint ownership of gas
interconnects - what is owned, cost to maintain, etc.

LV Cogen

* Update on status of Phase II permitting?
* Update on status of development process?
* Are there any tax abatements of any type for the Phase II project?

Additional Comments from PECO:

* Don't have price curves yet for all of the peakers markets - will
need to develop prior to final bid.
* May have a concern re: market power for the peakers as a result of
the PECO/Unicom merger.  They will be comfortable enough to bid this week
and don't expect it to be a concern for the final bid.
* They will probably submit a bid with separate values for: Wheatland;
other peakers together; LV Cogen.
* They are working their bid from two perspectives: replacement cost
plus a premium and discounted cash flow.  DCF will obviously change as they
get their price curves updated.


FYI - we proposed several alternatives to DWR that would effectively extend our put swaption through the end of April for a cost to ENA of approximately $5MM.  None of those were acceptable to DWR.  The option will therefore expire at 5:00 PPT today.  Vikram Budraja, Advisor to Gov Davis, suggested that we are not dealing in good faith and suggested that he will speak with Ken Lay (we have heard this several dozen times).  In any event, I expect to talk with DWR tomorrow to propose  a short-term transaction.  They might accept it, reject it or prefer one of the term option proposals.


Tana:

This email is just a follow-up on the telephone message that I left for you
earlier today.  As I explained, our firm (Chamberlain Hrdlicka) represents
Apache Corporation and I will be replacing Saul Laureles in concluding our
work related to the assignment of certain natural gas price swaps from
Fletcher Challenge Industries Limited ("Fletcher Challenge") to Shell
Overseas Holdings Limited ("Shell"), and the reassignment from Shell to
Apache Corporation. My contact information is as follows:

Robert J. Viguet, Jr. ("Bert")
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White Williams & Martin
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400
Houston, Texas 77056
Telephone:  713-654-9693
FAX:   713-658-2553
rviguet@chamberlainlaw.com

You should have received a letter from Saul Laureles dated February 6, 2001
via overnight courier requesting that your firm confirm certain facts related
to the swaps to be assigned as described above.  We are looking for a written
response to that inquiry at your earliest opportunity.  If there are any
errors or other discrepancies in the list of swap transactions or other
matters identified in the letter, we need to know as soon as possible so that
there will be time to resolve those issues before the assignments are made.

This firm (Chamberlain Hrdlicka) has prepared a draft of the Assignment and
Assumption Agreements for the transfer of the swaps from Fletcher Challenge
to Shell and from Shell to Apache Corporation. Our draft of the assignment
forms is being reviewed by attorneys for Shell now, but should be available
for your review in a few days. The acquisition of assets of Fletcher
Challenge Energy by Shell and Apache, and the related assignments of the swap
transactions, is expected to closes in early March.

If you have any questions or comments concerning the proposed transactions,
please don't hesitate to contact me.  I look forward to working with you.

This communication may be protected by the attorney/client privilege and may
contain confidential information intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed.  Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White,
Williams and Martin.  Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this e-mail without consent of the originator is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify Robert J. Viguet, Jr., by telephone at (713) 654-9693.


Attached is a black-lined copy of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Rick,

Attached are completed letters to the parties requested.  As you will note
there are two letters to Lone Star and two letters for Apache.  Since you are
sending these electronically to Michael Mazowita for him to obtain the
signature of Rick Vicens, please have copies of the executed letters sent to
Sandi Braband's attention.  These letters will have to be printed on
appropriate letterhead and copies sent to the CC's at the bottom of each
letter.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Bob Walker
Sr. Legal Specialist


<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

If
 you do not wish to receive email from Bargain Bazaar, please Click Here:

 UNSUBSCRIBE

HERE'S
 THE DEAL!

 We've just DOUBLED the value of the Web's hottest
 FREE OFFER. Not 2 - but

 4 ROUND-TRIP AIR TICKETS - ABSOLUTELY FREE
 to exciting destinations across the U.S., Caribbean,
 Hawaii or Mexico. Take the family or take two trips!
 And except for your hotel stay, there's NO OBLIGATION
 and NO PURCHASE REQUIRED for your trip. Imagine
 flying your family FREE to Florida, California,
 Las Vegas, Jamaica, Aruba, Bahamas, or other exciting
 vacation paradise! Plus, you get a 30-day FREE
 trial in Preferred Traveller, where you'll save big
 whenever and wherever you travel,

 dine or entertain!

 Act now! This FREE offer is good only for a limited
 time!

 The 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS are yours to keep,

 just for registering! Plus, your FREE TICKETS
 are

 GOOD FOR ONE FULL YEAR!

HERE'S
 ALL YOU NEED TO DO!

What
 do you have to lose?

 4 FREE AIRLINE TICKETS!

 GREAT TRAVEL SAVINGS!

 100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE!

Act
 now and you'll soon be jetting off to the

 vacation destination of your choice!

 <form method="get" action="http://www.bay9.com/cgi-local/search.cgi?" name="search" onSubmit="exit=false">

 <input type="text" name="keyword" size="40">

 <input type="image" src="http://www.m-ul.com/email/images/search/search_button.gif" width="183" height="33" name="image">

 <input type="hidden" name="link" value="">

 </form>


All applications residing on the R: drive will be temporarily unavailable
from Friday, June 22, 2001 at 10:30 P.M. until Saturday June 23, 2001 at 2:30
A.M. for users logging into the CORP domain serviced by Enron Net Works.  The
outage is needed to perform required system maintenance updates and increase
the storage capacity of the general application servers hosting the
applications managed by the Enron Net Works Distributed Application
Management group.

Any questions or concerns regarding this system outage can be directed to
Chris Jeska, (713) 345-7004.

The following have been identified as business critical applications that
will be affected by the outage:

Sitara
CMS
Equity trading systems (eqpm directory)
Adaytum
CQG
TMS
PowerMap Europe
PowerDat Europe
MapInfo Professional
Secretariat


FROM Dr Arusi Agbara.
AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING UNIT.
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPT.
AFRICAN INTERNATIONAL BANK.
LOME-TOGO.
TEL:00228-911-40-37.
FAX:00228-222-45-84

DEAR,
                   (CONFIDETIAL PLEASE)

I am Dr Arusi Agbara, chief accountant for the bills
and credits in the foreign remittance dept. section of

African International Bank Lome-Togo in west Africa
with due respect and regard. I have decided to contact
you on a business transaction that will be very
beneficial to both of us at the end of the
transaction.

During our investigation and auditting in this bank,
my
department came across a very huge sum of money
belonging to a deceased person who died on november
1992 in a plane crash and the fund has been dormant in
his account with this Bank without any claim of the
fund in our custody either from his family or relation
before our discovery to this development.

Although personally, I keep this information secret
within myself and partner to enable the whole plans
and idea be Profitable and successful during the time
of execution. The said amount was $6,500,000.00usd(six
million five hundred thousand united states dollars).

As it may interest you to know, I got your impressive
information through my good friends who works with
chamber of commerce on foreign business relations here
in Lome-Togo. It is him who recommended your person
to me to be viable and capable to champion a business
of such magnitude without any problem .

Meanwhile all the whole arrangements to put claim over
this fund as the bonafide next of kin to the deceased,
get the required approval and transfer this money to a
foreign account has been put in place and directives
and needed information will be relayed to you as soon
as you indicate your interest and willingness to
assist us and also benefit your self to this great
business opportunity.

In fact I could have done this deal alone but because
of my position in this country as a civil servant, we
are not allowed to operate a foreign account and would
eventually raise an eye brow on my side during the
time
of transfer because I work in this bank.

This is the actual reason why it will require a second
party or fellow who will forward claims as the next of
kin with affidavit of trust of oath to the Bank and
also present a foreign account where he will need the
money to be re-transferred into, on his request as it
may be after due verification and clarification by the
correspondent branch of the bank where the whole money
will be remitted from to your own designation bank
account.

I will not fail to inform you that this transaction
is 100% risk free. On smooth conclusion of this
transaction, you will be entitled to 30% of the total
sum as gratification, while 10% will be set aside to
take care of expenses that may arise during the time
of transfer and also telephone and fax bills, while
60% will be for me and my partner.

Please, you have been adviced to keep top secret as
we are still in service and intend to retire from
service after we conclude this deal with you. I will
be monitoring the whole situation here in this bank
until you confirm the money in your account. and ask
us
to come down to your country for subsequent sharing
of the fund according to percentage.

previously indicated and further investment, either in
your country or any country you advice us to invest
in. All other necessary information will be sent to
you
when I hear from you. I suggest you get back to me as
soon as possible, stating your wish in this deal.

Yours faithfully,
Dr.Arusi Agbara.
TEL:00228-911-40-37.
FAX:00228-222-45-84.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com


Carol-

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help facilitate the process.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: Enron  /  Conoco

 << File: Letter of Credit Draft Enron.doc >> << File: Enron 11 02.xls >> Jeff and/or John:
We are researching what we have with Conoco.  I may need your help on this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford, William S.
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2001 9:55 AM
To: St. Clair, Carol
Subject: FW: Enron / Conoco

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Curry, Ken
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Subject: FW: Enron / Conoco

Bill,
Here is the message I received from Conoco.  I spoke to Gayle Hayter and Greg Finn (I know both from the IECA).
Gayle's title is Senior Treasury Analyst, Phone (281) 293-3594
Greg's title is Supervisor, Corporate Credit & Financial Services, Phone (281) 293-6897
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
Thanks,
    Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayter, Gayle C. [mailto:Gayle.C.Hayter@conoco.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Curry, Ken
Cc: Durbin, John E.; Hixon, Steven L.; Frahm, Robert E. (Bob); Davis, M.
Eric; Romero, Donald G.; Bennett, Rex W.; Hunter, James E. (Jim);
Romasko, Dan R.; Cornwell, Dennis A.; Finn, Greg
Subject: Enron / Conoco

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Hayter, Gayle C.
> Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 2:15 PM
> To:	Finn, Greg
> Subject:	Enron
>
>
> Ken, per our conversation this morning, the attached Excel file contains
> the net Enron exposure identified by Conoco.  Please review and advise the
> numbers as per Enron's records.  Conoco is requesting a letter of credit
> as security for all Enron and subsidiaries exposure to Conoco Inc. and its
> subsidiaries.  Our exposure estimates assume that a netting agreement is
> put in place with Enron Reserves Acquisition Company to cover crude
> activity.  It also assumes a netting agreement is put in place with Enron
> North America to cover gas activity.
>
> An LC format acceptable to Conoco is attached.  The LC should secure the
> value of the identified exposure and should cover a one year term.  If the
> LC should ever need to be drawn,  required documents should include only
> the draft and a signed statement.
>
>
>  <<Letter of Credit Draft Enron.doc>>  <<Enron 11 02.xls>>
>
>
> Gayle C. Hayter
> Credit Risk Management
> Natural Gas and Power
> Phone: 281 293 3594
> Fax: 281 293 6947
>


When: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: 4th Floor Conference Room

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


A little light reading.  Another will follow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Agency Agreement

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:
                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and
15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections is
to significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event that
governmental action related to the agreement is modified in a manner
unacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can come
at any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involve
approval  "required" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did not
propose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement which
refers to adverse "rate approval". However, Peoples' intent may be to
obtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decision
re the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of a
termination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarily
required for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified "in any manner
which is unacceptable" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with the
original language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right to
circumstances when a "required" approval is revoked.) While the broadened
termination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, I
wouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of a
modified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agency
arrangement.
2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenue
definition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market Hub
Serivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, the
proposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the term
of the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to market
extended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination of
the Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)
eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.
Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the last
sentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative net
revenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,
apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH's
perspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actually
refunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not require
a retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreement
terminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would be
needed.
3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it make
nominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt or
delivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at a
secondary point for displacement delivery. Northern Illinois Gas Co. did
agree to these provision in the contract with its Hub Agent. I do not know
the value of these commitments to MEH from a business standpoint.
                         4. Sect. 1.13. Peoples proposes that the GTC be
defined to included changes made by Peoples in its sole discretion.
Peoples, however, is not free to change the GTC as it sees fit. FERC may
elect to allow changes proposed by Peoples to become effective, but Peoples
can, at most, "propose" changes in its sole discretion. How about: "the
effective general Terms and Conditions of the Operating Statament as may be
modified from time to time." Sect. 6.1 gives Peoples a right to propose
changes to the GTC, so there is no need to cover that here.
                              5. Sect. 1.17. The GTC does not indicate that
Parking and Loaning Service must be interruptible. I will review this
further.                      6. Sect. 2.2. Peoples has modified the
language giving it responsibility to ensure compliance with the GTC to
assign this obligation to both parties. The intent was to comply with
requirements of FERC orders indicating that an agent need not be
certificated as a "natural gas company", if there is another entity with
clear responponsibilty to ensure compliance with the Natural Gas Act and
FERC regulations. I suggest we stay with the origianl language indicating
that Peoples, the certificate holder, has the responsibility to ensure
compliance with regulatory requirements.
          7. Sect. 2.4b The thrid sentence is confusing in light of the
sending sentence indicating that MEH must consent to a change in
information re firm capacity. Perhaps "in its sole discretion" can be
delted and the last word of the third sentence changed to "appropriate".
                              8. Sect. 2.5. New Item 3 of the list of
grounds for refusal should be deleted. The GTC (Sect. 8.2) specifies the
grounds on which Hub Serivce can be denied. The Agency Agreement should not
add to this. Also, the GTC expressly requires that firm serivce provided
under the Operating Statement and firm serivce under peoples' Illiniois
tariffs have equal scheduling priority.
                                   9. Sect. 2.10. This Section places the
risk of non-payment on MEH, unless Peoples conducts the credit check. This
is how risk was allocated in the NIGAS Hub Agreement. That agreement,
however, provided for a 50/50 split of Hub revenue. As proposed by Peoples,
MEH would receive only an agency fee and lesser percentage of revenue. With
the changed allocation of revenue, a changed allocation of non-payment risk
also may be appropriate. Normally, the this risk should follow
responsibility for accepting the transaction. At a minimum, non-payment
risk should be assigned to Peoples if (i) it performs the credit check; or
(ii) requires MEH to accept a Hub customer which MEH has rejected based on
a credit analysis conducted under the GTC (Sect. 8.2).
     10. Sect. 3.3. The required refunds could be large relative to the
administrative fee. The revised language requires MEH to finance refunds
for ten business days. Should there be an interest component?
                                                        11. Sect. 3.4. This
Section suggests that MEH will receive a fee for Extended Hub Services. I'm
don't see how this occurs under the revised language.   12. Sect. 3.5.
Peoples proposes to delete the language requiring best efforts to minimize
imbalances. Compliance filings due this summer under FERC Order 637 are
expected to offer incentives related to avoidance of imbalances and Peoples
should attempt to use these procedures. We should discuss this with them on
Wed.
                    13. Sect. 5.1. Peoples has modified the warranties to
indicate consistency of the Agency Agreement with "material" contractcs and
Judgments or Laws not expected to have a material adverse effect. Is it
suffucuent to have minor contract violations and inconsistency with some
Laws/Judgments?               14. Sect. 7.1 The NIGAS Hub Agreement did not
have a flat fee component.
15. Sect. 10.1. Because the Governmental Approval must be acceptable to
both Peoples and MEH, People should not have "sole" authority to prepare
and file all applications.
                                         16. Sect. 10.2. See comments above
re Governmental Approval. Also, I don't think there is a need for the word
"expressly" in the first sentence.            17. Sect. 11.1. Should the
Section require consent for transfer by operation of law if we wish to have
this requirement in the event that the Hub facilities are sold?

          18. Sect. 15.1 (a). If this type of provision is going to be
included, should there at least be an initial period (say a year) to get
started which doesn't trigger a termination right? The NIGAS Agreement had
a section along these lines.
          19. Sect. 15.1 (f). See comments above re Governmental Approval.
                                                   20. Former 15.1 (f) now
deleted. This provided that the Agency Agreement could be terminated is MEH
is dissolved. This seems necessary to me.          21. 15.1 (g) Peoples
wishes to have sole discretion to change its Facilities or the GTC, but
proposes to limit MEH's termination right in the event that such a change
impairs the HUB's marketability. It seems reasonably to allow MEH to
terminate if it believes that HUB marketability is impaired, without a need
to demonstrate reasonableness.
                                         22. Sect. 17.1 I don't understand
why Peoples wishes to require confidentiality for the compensation
sections. The Illinois Commission Staff and interested parties would have
access to this information under a protective agreement. This would
unnecessarily complicate the approval process and I don't know what there
is to gain from secrecy. These provisions were part of the public record in
the NIGAS approval case.                                     That's all.
Let's discuss tomorrow.


Tana:

Carol was working on this, but I understood that the deal died.

Jeff

	Tana Jones
	08/01/2000 12:50 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc: Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: assignment of deals from Merchant Energy Group of the Americas to
Morgan Stanley

Is there someone in our group that is working on this.  I looked in Lotus
Notes and didn't find any entry for this.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 12:49 PM -----

	Tracy Ngo
	08/01/2000 07:48 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: assignment of deals from Merchant Energy Group of the Americas to
Morgan Stanley

Tana,

Before Carol St. Clair left for maternity leave, she was working on the
assignment of some financial and gas deals with Christopher Smith (who
previously worked in our group).  Since Christopher is no longer here and
with Carol being out, I'm scrambling to find out who in the financial team is
working on this.

I've left Mark Taylor a message since Carol's voice mail forwards all
questions to Mark.

Could you let me know if you have any info?

Thx,
Tracyh


Tom neglected to put the broker in on this deal. It's number 463045.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   11/20/2000 02:43 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing-Alonso Deal

Hello
I am missing a Tom Alonso Deal

Bloomberg bro confirm
11/20/00
Enron Buys IdahoPower Co
Palo Verde
Dec2000
25mws
125.00
on peak

Thanks


I have updated the profile template to include new products (in magenta)  as
well as deleting the following from the template:

BEL Gas Fin Swap
BEL Gas Phy Opt
BEL Gas Phy Swing
ESP Power Fin Opt
NOR Power Phy Fwd
Nor Weather CDD opt
Nor Weather CDD Swap
Nor Weather PREC Opt
Nor Weather PREC Swap
UK Power Fin Opt
UK RejectedCoal CIF Phy Fwd
UK RejectedCoal CIF Phy Opt
UK Steamcoal CIF Phy Fwd
UK SteamCoal CIF Phy Opt
UK Weather CDD Opt
UK Weather CDD Swap
UK Weather PREC Opt
UK Weather PREC Swap
US Alum Fin Midwest Internal
US Alum Phy Midwest Transac
US Copper Fin Bonded Internal

Please begin using the new profile and let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
mike.thack@bea.com.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Received: from beamail.beasys.com (beamail.beasys.com [206.189.42.10])
 by dallas.beasys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24961
 for <mthack@dallas.beasys.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:06:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
Received: from usmailgw1.beasys.com (usmailgw1.bea.com [63.96.161.21])
 by beamail.beasys.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA22200
 for <mike.thack@beasys.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by usmailgw1.beasys.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA00631
 for <mike.thack@beasys.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP
id f3UM5Q617017
 for <mike.thack@beasys.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:05:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com
(nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com [172.28.10.38])
 by mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id
f3UM5PL10697
 for <mike.thack@beasys.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:05:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id
<Tac1c0a2681533c8fa16f@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<mike.thack@beasys.com>;
 Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:05:31 -0500
Subject: NDA - BEA Systems, Inc.
To: mike.thack@bea.com
Cc: Kevin.Montagne@enron.com, Mark.S.Palmer@enron.com,
Rex.Shelby@enron.com,
        Mark.Greenberg@enron.com, Travis.McCullough@enron.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OF086D3F8C.BCD8A2AA-ON86256A3E.0078D611@enron.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:05:20 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6
|December 14, 2000) at
 04/30/2001 05:00:45 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
 Boundary="0__=86256A3E0078D6118f9e8a93df938690918c86256A3E0078D611"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-UIDL: 998bc1c54d4611ce7ddd6c8405ddbc6b


Dear Market Participants,

Please note the changes below are planned for the indicated
OASIS/MIS/CSS systems on the dates shown.  Updates and revisions
will follow as needed to keep you informed.
Please direct any questions or comments back to me.

Thank you,
Pete Morrison
Customer Relations
518-356-6060

##################################################################
Scheduled for 12/13/00
Change type - Enhancement
Description:
The Billing system will be corrected to use external zonal prices
for the calculation of external load transactions.
The SPIDER power system model will be updated to reflect physical
changes to the electric system.
The Manual Dispatch System (MDS) will be modified to reflect the
recent transfer in ownership of Indian point 3; the DNI values for
that unit will be included in the DNI calculation for ConEd

?s
region (previously scheduled for 12/6/00).
FKOI-4RLQ5U; JCWG-4RBSEJ; MGUE-4RPMKN
##################################################################


This SHOULD be it.  Please circulate, including Lee.

Thanks once again,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/12/2001 08:13:02 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject: RE: Revised Salmon Agreement

I will make these changes this morning. Do you want me to circulate the
revised draft once these changes are incorporated, or are we expecting
more comments?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:09 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement

2nd of 2.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001
03:08
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   kay.mann@enron.com

Subject:  Revised Salmon Agreement

Kent/Kay-

I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount,
Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount.  The Power System
Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill
Williams
advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not.  That's
consitent
with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen).

Regards,

Lee <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC>>

(See attached file: Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC)


FYI
Watch out Craig. We're all after you!!  Someone even suggested that I come down there and retrieve it!
	Alma G.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:21 AM
To:	Buehler, Craig
Cc:	Green, Alma; Studebaker, James ; Carpenter, Nancy; Giambrone, Laura; Veatch, Stephen; Kilmer III, Robert; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Thompson, Debra; Doll, Jeanette; Paschal, Zelda; Culwell, Christi; Allen, Kelly; Dietz, Rick
Subject:	Toaster

We will never negotiate with toaster terrorists!  We will eat raw bread forever rather than turn over a single sheet of paper - or even a single chad - to those who would resort to such extortion.  If we give in now, we will only encourage such acts in the future.  First our microwaves, then our filtered water dispenser, then our refrigerators will become targets of these evil doers.  Rather, we will hunt down those responsible for this dastardly act, and bring them to justice or justice to them.  We will also go after any department supporting the evil doers as well as anyone who partakes of bread (or Eggos or pop tarts) toasted in the purloined appliance!

EPLF -- you're TOAST!!!!!

Small Appliance Defenders In Support of Toasters  (SADIST)


#10728
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mier, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Realtime,
Subject:	New BPA Contract #

Our old BPA contract # was 96104 our new BPA Contract # is 10728. Just wanted to give the group a heads up.

Mike


Sue:
Sorry that I didn't get back to you over the weekend but with Arthur's
baseball schedule and all the running around that we were trying to do,
things were a bit hectic.  I'm officially brain dead today so I thought that
I would take a break and write to one of my favorite people.

Things on the baby front are progressing well.  On our last ultrasound we got
the news taht we were hoping for with respect to the placenta problem and so
I've got the green light basically to do whatever I want to do although I am
still taking it easy and swimming alot.  The baby weighed about 4 pounds a
few weeks ago and everything looked great so I was quite relieved.  Now I'm
trying to spend what little free time I have getting ready.  the people here
at work are having a baby shower a week from Friday so hopefully that will
help since other than some of Arthur's clothes I am starting from scratch.
Work is going well although I am looking forward to winding down in a few
weeks.  I'm hoping that I can work up until the very end to maximize my time
off but we will see how that goes.  I really feel great except for being
uncomfortable at night and not getting much sleep but i suppose that this is
good practice for when the baby comes.

Arthur is doing great.  We got him 2 gerbils as a substitute for a larger
pet!  They're pretty cute, small, clean and so far easy to maintain.  He is
still heavily into baseball and was just selected for the All-star team which
we were absolutely thrilled about as was he!  He called dad practically every
day that he was trying out for the team to give him an update and I'm hoping
that dad can fly down for the tournament this weekend.  Arthur would  be on
cloud nine if he came.  We'll see.  Mom and dad offerred to keep Arthur for a
week over the summer and we are looking into that.  I'm toying with the
possibility of sending him when the baby is born, but  I'll just have to see
how it works out.  I would really love for you and mom to come once the baby
is born.  Do you have any thoughts on that?  You are obvious;y welcome at any
time, but i sense from mom taht she would prefer to wait until sometime in
august.  Let me know what you think.

How is Cindy doing?  Do you know what she needs for her new addition?  Do you
want to get her a joint gift?  Let me know.  I'm happy to do either something
on my own or jointly with you.  How's Cate?  Give her my best.

What's new with you and your career situation?  I hope that you are enjoying
what you are doing.  I certainly am and  I am still undecided about what I am
going to do once that baby is born, although I would really like to take the
rest of the year off.

I've got to run to my "baby class" tonight.  Take care and I will try to
catch up with you sometime.  I love you!

Carol


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 06:00 PM -----

	Melba Lozano
	05/17/2000 02:56 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PA and ETA

Mark,

I hope this helps you out.  Please let me know if you need something else.

Thank you,

Melba
58986


In order to remain consistent with Enron's new security access procedures for the Enron Center Campus in Houston, all Body Shop Members and Guests will be required to present their Enron Photo Badge ID or a Photo Driver's License to the Body Shop Security Officer each time they enter the Body Shop.  We appreciate your assistant to expedite these procedures by being prepared to present your ID to the Body Shop Security Officer each time you enter the Body Shop.  All members will continue to use their Enron ID Badges to access the exterior Body Shop building security card reader as well as use their Badge ID's at the Body Shop Front Desk Member card reader.

Lee Wright
Body Shop Program Manager


I will be in a meeting with BP Amoco from 12 to 2.  Can we do this at 2 pm.

Thanks DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Jolly, Rich; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Roensch, David; Sturn, John; McChane, Bob
Cc:	Asante, Ben
Subject:	Re: Pigging of SJ - Bloomfield to Gallup - Conference call, 1:00 p.m., CST, Wednesday, 09/19/01

A conference call to discuss possible pigging of the Bloomfield to Gallup line has been scheduled for:

1:00 p.m., CST, Wednesday, 09/19/01
877-795-3687
115008

Talk to you then.

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Sturn/ET&S/Enron on 09/17/2001 12:50 PM ---------------------------

Rich Jolly
09/13/2001 02:18 PM
To:	Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob McChane/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Re: Pigging of SJ - Bloomfield to Gallup   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Ben my comment's below.

From:	Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/12/2001 05:13 PM CDT
To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob McChane/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Pigging of SJ - Bloomfield to Gallup

As the efficiencies of the lateral (between Bloomfield and Gallup) steadily decrease it is time to probably think about pigging that section again in time for the upcoming tariff season. We will be scheduling a meeting next week to talk about the following:
1)	When should we do this?
            Ben can your group figure what volume loses we are incurring as the percentage of efficiency goes down? After that we need to get marketing involved and
            let them tell us when to pig the line and add new inhibitor.
2)	Should we also consider surfactant cleaning?
            This will have to be looked at but only after running pigs to see what condition the pipeline is in.
3)	It has been almost 6 months since the application of the DRA on that section. Should we re-apply?
            Again this is dependent on revenue loss compared to percentage loss and marketing will have to be involved.
4)	What are the costs-outages, cost of app
            This is dependent on what all we will be doing. If we add surfactant the cost will be quite a bit more. How many times do we run the pigs to get the line ready 	(we don't know this.) We'll need to work with Darrell Schoolcraft and marketing on outages. Cost of application we can get this from Nalco.
  5)	What are the benefits.
            Getting back to 7% increase in efficiency.

           I'll be in a meeting in Oklahoma next week but will be available for a call.

Thanks
RJ

Please let John Sturn or myself know of when you cannot make a meeting next week.
Thanks

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Unfortunately I do not have a phone right now so I will have to call as soon
as they get me up and running.  I went ahead and sent out the dates we have
on schedule currently with the intention that if we get new dates they will
be announced in the team meeting on Thursday.    Hope that is okay.  I needed
to get a message out to participant soon so we don't get in a bind in a
couple of weeks.

Kristin

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
08/28/2000 11:02 AM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Carnegie Mellon Team Meeting

Kristin,

What about the visit to the campus on Nov. 3?

Any resolution?

Vince

Kristin Gandy@ENRON
08/28/2000 10:03 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kent Densley/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andre
Beskrowni/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Gaurav
Babbar/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Walt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John B Gordon/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dave Cummings/ENRON@Gateway
cc: Judy Nyegaard/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Carnegie Mellon Team Meeting

Greetings, Carnegie Mellon Recruiting Team!

Each of you has been chosen to represent Enron for our Fall 2000 recruiting
efforts at Carnegie Mellon University.  As part of the team, you will be
challenged with choosing the best candidates from Carnegie Mellon's Graduate
School to join our Associate Program.

Our first campus event will be on September 15 and interviews will be held on
campus December 11 and 12.  I hope you are all able to participate in the
exciting process of recruiting young talent.

We will be more formally organising ourselves in the next couple of weeks.
Currently, we are planning to have a brief team meeting in order to make
introductions, inform you about the Associate Program, and discuss the fall
recruiting calendar.  To that end, please contact me with any questions or
comments you may have.

The team meeting date is set for August 31st at 10am in room 19C2.

Please RSVP to me as soon as possible.

I look forward to meeting you all soon.

Sincerely,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
x 53214


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 04:18
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           09/12/2000 01:05 PM

To: Stan Dowell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Atkinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Alejandro Hernandez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, David Shields/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Swank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Layne/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marshall
Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Davoli/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, TJ Rylander/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Priya Jaisinghani/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jonathan Roumel/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Todd Van Roten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Chuck Randall/HOU/EES@EES,
Brad Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mo Bawa/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Chris Loehr/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Pyke/AP/Enron@Enron, Ken Tate/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hans Oliver
Pereira/HOU/EES@EES, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Cunningham/HOU/EES@EES, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ronnie Shields/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marshall Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lanette Earnest/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Cole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Yang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Leon Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zeina El-Azzi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Milliner/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Millie
Gautam/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Donna Hutton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Enron Presentation

Dear Recruiting Team Members:

I am forwarding a copy of the Enron presentation to each of you for review.
Some of you will be asked to do presentations, many will not.  I just wanted
to send it out to various team members in order to give you an idea of our
marketing strategy and information on campus.  This is simply for your
information.  When this presentation is given, it will include  dates
tailored specifically for each campus based on the dates I have set up
through career services.

Have a great day!

Lexi Elliott
3-4585


Prepay for Dominion for April 2002 to be made on Friday, March 29th.  I printed out the attached form and gave it to Doug Sewell.

Prepay amount = 10,000 dth per day x 30 days x $2.1562 = $646,860.00


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	 Staff Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		2/20/2001
Time:		11:00 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


George:

1.  You didn't answer my question about "Calculation Period" and "IPA
Modified Calculation Period".

2.  Are you saying that EEL "elects" to increase/decrease the Basket
Component Shares?
Are you saying that the "IPA Number of Shares" is negative or the IPA is
negative?
Is the IPA negative when the Initial Price exceeds the Relevant Price?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Jorge A Garcia@ENRON
	04/03/2001 08:37 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RMT/EEL confirmation

Good Morning Sara,

"Share Spread" is not applicable and should be deleted.

A negative IPA is subject to a specific swap traded. It would have to be a
case where the Stock is already part of the Basket and they elect to unwind
the swap and reduce the number of shares from the basket. For example, if
10,000 shares of XYZ Company were part of the original basket, they can trade
off 5,000 shares of the swap effectively creating a negative IPA. The trade
is mutually agreed upon.

Looking forward to meeting with you!

Jorge

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/02/2001 06:32 PM
To: Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RMT/EEL confirmation

Jorge:  I may send you some emails throughout the day to help clarify some
things for me.

 Where are your definitions of "Calculation Period" and "IPA Modified
Calculation Period"?

In your definition of "IPA Floating Rate Payment", you use the term "Share
Spread" which is not defined.  What do you mean?  There is a dangling
definition of "Share Spread" at the end of the IPA Compensation section, but
it refers to spreads appearing in either Annex I or Annex II.

In the "IPA Compensation" section, how is "a negative IPA elected"?  Who is
making an election?

Let's discuss tomorrow.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Need your help on the following: Each day we are delayed in finalising var,
p&L and positions because the UK must wait for a USD  interest rate curves
before submitting their data to Houston. I am also told that it is really not
necessary to wait for this curve and the data could be submitted close of
business London. Even if there was some minor inaccuracy from this method it
would be better than what we have now. This would greatly improve the
efficiency (by 4 to 6 hours) in reporting to senior management. Can you guys
initiate this change or get me to the right person there. Thanks, Rick


Jaime:  When speaking with you earlier, I completely forgot to mention that
Carol St. Clair (Ext. 33989) will be addressing EOL issues arising in
connection with Enron Mexico Corp.  Please forgive me.  I know that Carol is
trying to finalize communications with our outside counsel in Mexico.  It may
be helpful for you to have a conversation with her about your goals, etc. for
her to include in her discussions.

I am still handling financial derivatives matters in general for Mexico.

Please let me hear from you and I look forward to meeting with you later this
week.  Regards.  Sara


MARKET NOTICE
November 2, 2001
Publication of Real Time Energy Information

ISO Market Participants
SC Settlement Contacts
Currently, although Scheduling Coordinators are charged for Real Time Energy
purchases above Market Clearing Price (MCP), including Out of Market (OOM),
they see very limited energy price information until they receive their
Preliminary Settlement Statements 38 days after the Trade Date. The
Preliminary Settlement Statement shows:
*	the total dollars spent procuring imbalance energy over the MCP;
*	the total MWh of deviations; and
*	their own deviations.
	But, the statement does not show hourly average prices above MCP or
hourly MWh purchases for above-MCP quantities.  This information is a key
factor both in facilitating SCs' ability to validate their Settlement
Statements and in providing increased transparency to real time energy
prices.
	On November 5, 2001, the ISO will begin publishing on OASIS,
consistent with ISO Governing Board direction, additional information about
real time energy purchases, both BEEP and OOM. We plan to publish the
following data:
*	Average Incremental and Decremental volume and price calculated
using BEEP, Out of Sequence (OOS) and OOM data hourly and published the day
after Trade Day.  This data will usually be available daily by 0800 to 1000,
although the initial release on November 5 to be during the afternoon.
*	Average Incremental and Decremental volume and price calculated
using BEEP, OOS and OOM data by 10-minute interval published seven days
after Trade Day;
*	Average hourly Ex-Post Energy price (includes inc and dec)
calculated consistent with BEEP only published the day after Trade Day; and.
*	Average hourly Ex-Post Energy price (includes inc and dec)
calculated consistent with BEEP only Ex-post by interval published seven
days after Trade Day.
Initially, the ISO will publish only current data.  However, we are planning
to publish historical data, as well, as time permits to validate and publish
the historical average prices.
We have posted a screen shot (with artificial data) at
http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/06/01/2000060109560313721.html
<http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/06/01/2000060109560313721.html>  showing
what the actual OASIS page will look like.
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact
your Client Relations Account Manager.
Client Relations Communications.0715
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


HPL Gas Control shows that Terry with Tufco Gas Control requested an increase
from 0.0 (Zero) to 60.0 effective 1:00 PM and Don with Tufco Gas Control
requested a cut from 60.0 to 0.0 (Zero) effective 1:00 AM.  The nom should be
30.0 according to HPL Gas Control records.

If you have any questions please call 713.853.6449

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 10:46
AM ---------------------------

"Melissa Jones" <mjones7@txu.com> on 02/08/2001 10:39:05 AM
To: "Charlie Stone" <cstone1@txu.com>, "Gary Green" <ggreen2@txu.com>,
daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com,
carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, "David Avila"
<davila1@txu.com>, Liz.Bellamy@enron.com, "Ronnie Skerik" <rskerik1@txu.com>,
kponton@duke-energy.com
cc:
Subject: 2/07/01 GAS FLOW

We show the nom for Teco Tap to be 30.000  and the Actual for Teco Tap is
21.814

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on
02/08/2001
10:52 AM ---------------------------

kponton@duke-energy.com on 02/08/2001 09:06:50 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  2/07/01 GAS FLOW

NOM = 17,500 (6:00 PM STARTED 60,000 RATE & SHUT OFF AT 1:00 AM)

ACTUAL FLOW = 21,076 MCF     21,814 MMBtu's


Shelly,

These are the Super Saturdays I can help you with:

Nov 10
Dec 1
Dec 8
Dec 15

I shall be traveling on two other days. One of these trips is related to
recruiting at CMU.

Vince

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shelly Jones, Recruiting Manager @ ENRON
10/24/2000 09:12 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENA Employees
cc:
Subject: Associate/Analyst Super Saturday Participation - ADDITIONAL REQUEST

 ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWER PARTICIPATION IS REQUESTED FOR OCTOBER 28 & NOVEMBER
4.

Also, please note the school/date changes (in red).  This change was
necessary due to the number of candidates participating in Super Saturday.
If you have a change in your participation as a result of the date change,
please contact John Harrison, ext. 3-7811 for revisions.

Thank you
Shelly Jones

******************************************************************************
*************************************************

Enron Managing Directors, Vice Presidents, Directors, and Managers  Who
Utilize the Associate/Analyst Pool

As a follow up from a "SAVE THE DATE"  email regarding your participation in
the  Associate and Analyst  Super Saturday process, now is the time to select
your dates to attend and participate.

Below are the dates for Super Saturday weekends during the upcoming
recruiting season.  If you are Houston-based or if you know you will be in
Houston on business at the appropriate times please click the link below to
volunteer.

http://axis.enron.com/notice/ssinvite.asp
(When selecting dates please avoid selecting to interview candidates who
attend the schools for which you are a team member.)

Associates     Analysts
October 27-28, 2000    November 3-4
Thunderbird, UT, Georgetown, Rice  Rice, UT, Baylor, A&M, OU, Florida, LSU,
UHCL

November 10-11, 2000    November, 17-18, 2000
Columbia, Stern NYU, UCLA, Darden, Cornell Penn, UVA, Vanderbilt, Michigan,
Howard, AUC,
Vanderbilt, Michigan    UHMain and Clear Lake, LSU

December, 1-2, 2000    December 8-9, 20000
Chicago, Kellogg, Harvard, Wharton, MIT Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules
from previous s/s
-
Friday, December 15, 2000
Carnegie Mellon
Yale off-cycle candidates

Thank you for your support of the Associate and Analyst Programs.
Shelly Jones
Recruiting Manager


Please send an estimate of time and description of the topic to Rebecca.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 08:49 AM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	11/21/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Beena Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosane
Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mary_trosper@pgn.com, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie
Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES,
Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - December 12th


Attractive Rates = The Time To CASH OUT Your Home Equity!
The smart homeowners are reaping the benefits of lower interest rates by
their equity for bill consolidation, vacations, new cars or boats, education purposes,
tax benefits or just to have the extra cash.
GET ALL OF THE SMART MONEY YOU NEED!
Damaged Credit Is never a problem!
 We work with nation-wide lenders that are offering great deals
 and will provide you with the best service on the INTERNET!
Our service is 100% free!CLICK HERE For more details and to receive a no obligation quotation today!
We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want anyone who does not wish to receive
our  mailings to receive them. Please click here to be deleted from further communicationClick Here to unsubscribe from future promotions.


Hi Mark-

Attached are the GTC's discussed in my preceding e-mail.

Best regards,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 08/16/2000 04:52 AM -----

	John Viverito
	08/15/2000 01:20 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 Subject: Weather Derivative GTC's with Enron Japan Corp. as Counterparty

Alan/David-

Attached hereto, are the GTC's with Enron Japan Corp. as counterparty for EOL
trading of Japanese weather derivative HDD swaps.  The US GTC's were utilized
as the basis of the documentation.  The GTC's have been tailored to the
Japanese market in conjunction with Baker & McKenzie, Tokyo.

Please review and provide comments prior to loading onto the EOL system.  I
note that September 1, 2000 is the date on which trading on this basis is
expected to begin.

Cheers,

John


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
08:58 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ted C Bland                           05/26/2000 07:39 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Super Saturday June 3, 2000

Gentlemen - Thanks for your support of ENA's Super Saturday next week.  I
have attached a preliminary schedule (which will change I'm surebut I will
keep you updated) for your review.  Thanks again.  Ted


Mr. Lay-

After reading the news of your $60,000,000 to $80,000,000 payout, I am disgusted and appalled all over again.  Unfortunately, that's a daily occurrence.

I have been employed with Enron since May of 1993, when Enron purchased LRC.  I was very skeptical of Enron back then and was unsure of my future with the company.  As time went on, I got more comfortable with the Enron way and learned how to survive and even be a little successful here.  I became a believer in the things Enron could accomplish, a champion of our hard-nosed, driven executives (at least some of them).  I bought Enron stock and held on to those valuable options.

Over the last 18 months, my coworkers and I have viewed the weekly, sometimes daily, selling of Enron stock and exercising of options by our top executives (past and present and including you).  We came up with all kinds of reasons that the executives would be doing this -- they're so overly compensated that they have to cash out some every now and then, divorce settlements, mistress settlements, buying a new home in Aspen, buying an island in the Caribbean, etc., etc. etc....  We never wanted to admit that they knew something we didn't.  Things were great, weren't they?  Jeff Skilling told us that Enron was going to be the "World's Leading Company."  He even put the goofy acronyms on his car license plate.  He told us gas traders in February how the stock was going to $126 by the end of the year. Now, being the cynic that I am, I didn't believe the $126, although I have to admit I was hopeful; I figured that if Jeff had the audacity to throw out a number that high, then it was reasonable to expect the stock to be fairly stable, i.e., +/- 20%.

Needless to say, I didn't sell my stock and didn't exercise any more options.  In fact, I bought more stock when it first started going down.  I'm afraid that there are many more just like me.  I'm fortunate in that I have many working years ahead of me (where, I don't know) to try to build up my savings again.  Many others are not that fortunate.  So many have spent their entire careers here, helping to build this company up.  They were looking forward to retiring soon and enjoying the fruits of their labor.  And let me remind you that their retirement accounts were in many cases a lot less than a month's compensation for you.  Now even that is essentially gone.  Other employees were just ready to cash in some of their options to pay for their children's college tuition.  The stories are too numerous to list, and the more I think about it, the more sickened I become.

It is painfully obvious to me and my coworkers, as well as the rest of the industry and Houston, that Enron's executives knew that there were skeletons in the closet and began cashing in ahead of this freefall.  The employees and the rest of the world were fed a bunch of half-truths and mystery mumbo-jumbo.  There should be an accounting for this behavior.  You and your cohorts have ruined so many lives.  Think about that while you're spending your millions.....

Susan Pereira
ENA Gas Trader


I love this one!

 <<ATT00005.jpg>>

 - ATT00005.jpg


Please note time and location for Promotion Luncheon for Managers:

Location: EB 32C2
Time: 11:30 AM
Date:  Today, Tuesday, February 6, 2001

We look forward to seeing you there.  If you have any questions, please call
me.

Thanks,
Patti x39106


Need to discuss how we currently use No-Notice in daily scheduling allocations, how the tariff identifies No Notice service, and how the No Notice Qty is to be maintained in the new contract system according to the tariff.


Greg,  Attached is the document we discussed.  Please review.  Mariner is a
party to this agreement since Mariner is performing all operations and
maintence functions for the MEGS assets and this is consistent with the
Operation and Maintance Agreement between Mariner and MEGS.  Please call me
at (713) 853-3512 with questions.


Enron Tiger Team:

The Enron Tiger Team mid-project review date has been set for Tuesday, Feb
20 from 6:30-8:30pm  in SHDH 205.  Your host will be on campus for the
review.

Each of the 3 teams will present at this time followed by Q&A.

All students are required to attend.  Questions, please contact the FAP
office.

Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
215.573.8394   fax 215.573.5727
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


John
I apologize for the tone of my e-mail, but hope you agree that from your e-mail, it could be interpreted that at the last minute, I was asking for a new,comprehensive cost estimate- i.e. Level B for the entire project. This is, and always was our mission to provide a full and complete cost estimate for the project.
I really don't need a lesson in how to deal with contractors, and fully realize they will do whatever is asked of them, since they are being paid on a time basis.
The task of getting ENSR to do a complete cost estimate of all environmental work related to the execution of the project is a vital and important component of the total project cost estimate. Whether the project proceeds or not is highly dependent on the economics of the project, and therfore, getting ENSR to define the work and estimate the associated costs cannot be considered as a wasted task that has no value. We do need an estimate of the all encompassing budget, and then as a complete analysis is done, decide whether to proceed with any or all parts of the defined scope.
I look forward to  putting this misunderstanding behind us and work together in a co-ordinated effort to complete the task at hand (getting as good a cost estimate as we can) and see if this project is economically feasible

Thank You.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shafer, John
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Cebryk, Doug; Campbell, Larry; 'spatti@ENSR.com'
Cc:	Kendrick, William; Hyatt, Kevin; 'jschmidt@ENSR.com'; Jensen, Ruth; Martin, Jerry D.
Subject:	RE: Additional Cost Estimate - Sun Devil Project

Doug,
No, its not unclear.  You are misinterpreting the instructions I was passing along to ENSR.  As a basic premise of dealing with consultants, one has to understand that they will spend time doing whatever you ask them to do (i.e., prepare a budget for tasks from beginning to an FERC filing or prepare a budget for tasks to take us from beginning to post construction).  Either way, you have to pay for what you ask them to do.  Therefore, you keep the marching orders as simple as possible, taking the process in steps.  In this way you eliminate superfluous tasks that are not essential at the moment.   Sometimes these projects start out like "gangbusters," but for commercial reasons or some other reason, they go away and you could be left paying for a task that basically has no added value.  I have found it best not to go that route.

In this instant case, I had broken down my instructions to ENSR so as to minimize their expenditures and even though from your perspective "ETS has been responsible for preparing a Level B estimate for Sun Devil since day one", the consultant need only know and respond to the task at hand - which is the way I have handled it.  That is why I worded my note the way I did.  It is not a "new" request, but a continuation of one that he has already started.   By working it this way, you only pay for what you need and for what you get - not for an all encompassing budget that may never materialize.

John Shafer

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cebryk, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Shafer, John; Campbell, Larry; 'spatti@ENSR.com'
Cc:	Kendrick, William; Hyatt, Kevin; 'jschmidt@ENSR.com'; Jensen, Ruth
Subject:	RE: Additional Cost Estimate - Sun Devil Project

John
I am surprised that you interpret this is a new request.
From day 1, ETS has been responsible for preparing a Level B estimate for the Sun Devil project.
What I would like your group to do is come up with a cost estimate for all work related to the environmentsl aspect of the project from today through to completion of the project. i.e a Jan, 2004 in service date
Timewise, I would lime a first pass estimate by Sept 21, a second pass estimate by Sept 26, and the final complete estimate by Sept 28
Please call me if unclear and so that we can discuss.
Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shafer, John
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 6:24 PM
To:	Campbell, Larry; 'spatti@ENSR.com'
Cc:	Kendrick, William; Cebryk, Doug; Hyatt, Kevin; 'jschmidt@ENSR.com'; Jensen, Ruth
Subject:	Additional Cost Estimate - Sun Devil Project
Importance:	High

Larry and Scott,
Doug Cebryk, Project Manager for the Sun Devil Project has requested that we furnish a more complete cost estimate (Level B) which would take the Environmental costs through the post construction phase.  Another words, take the budget you have furnished which was through the FERC filing phase and extrapolate additional environmental costs for processing the filing, obtaining the permits, environmental third party inspecting costs during construction and mitigation.  That must be given to Doug Cebryk by COB on Friday, September 21.  This will include all air permit costs.  If you have any questions, please give me a call.  John


I'm going to visit with the Hermanator briefly tomorrow.  Would you like to
join me?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 05:38
PM ---------------------------

Herman Manis
08/23/2000 05:33 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO meeting

Let's do 2:30 tomorrow for 30 minutes in 3394.

To: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO meeting

Yikes.  Would you have just 30 minutes sometime during the afternoon
tomorrow?  I really struck out with everyone else for Friday.  Otherwise,
I'll be glad to schedule a meeting on Friday (in addition to this one
tomorrow) to review the structure with the various players.  You pick a time
(the earlier being better for me).

Thanks,

Kay

Herman Manis
08/23/2000 04:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO meeting

I am already booked solid tomorrow afternoon on another deal.  Friday is much
better.

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VEPCO meeting

Looks like Thursday at 300pm is working out for most people to meet to
discuss the VEPCO PPA. The meeting will be held in EB38C1.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Kay


http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/WoPEc/data/Papers/wopcirano97s41.html

http://www.cera.com/client/knowledgearea/report/0,1448,CID2403_KID2_TYPRPT,00.html


Great. Can you come to trading floor around 11:30 am on Wednesday?  I am
located at 3210C.

Sincerely,
Mike Grigsby


I have nominated 16,646mm at 368 on the 10th and taken it to 1mm per Charlene on the 11th. As of the 12th, I took it to "0".   Our trader, Tom Donohoe,  has told me that since you have a force majure there as of the 12th. we can not take the well to 1 and it will be at "0" till you are flowing gas to us again.  If you have gas that flows onto the system we will discuss buying it from you later in the month.   Please have your  marketer  call Tom Donohoe if you need to discuss this at 713-853-7151.
Mark

"Victor Haley" <Victor.Haley@dvn.com> on 05/11/2001 02:03:23 PM
To:	<Mschrab@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Mark-  HIOS just called and asked that Enron nom a 1 for HI	351/368 beginning May 10 instead of 0.

Mark-  HIOS just called and asked that Enron nom a 1 for HI 351/368 beginning May 10 instead of 0.  The reason for this is that their system needs this to allocate correctly.  Please advise if you have any questions at 405-228-4298.  Thanks!


I have prepared a draft for enovate and CPS  from Rudwell Johnson's credit
sheet dated 6/1.   I also have CPS's redline comments to your discussion with
Randy which is Jeff's draft, and I have CPS's redline comments to a  draft
between ENA / CPS.

I have not discussed any of the above with the counterparty.

.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Put the West desk down for 5 people.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
03:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           10/12/2000 09:38 AM

To: Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Paint ball

The date is good for the West desk.  I will forward a headcount later today.

DG    3-9573


Tana:  Please provide the following individuals with Lotus Notes access.
Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 05:40 PM -----

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	05/16/2000 04:44 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Financial Database

Hi Sara, the following three people will need access to the financial
database we were discussing:

Melissa Murphy
Kim Theriot
Rhonda Denton

Thank you,
Melissa


no real bias today  positive numbers sell negative numbers buy...
looking into other stuff

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/06/2001 09:15:40 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: contangos vs winter putspds

agreewith all, im mega bear summer 2nd q but for the time being weather and
as u
said uncertainy likely to lend itself so little downside until either weather
gets warm or injections get big. i dont see the flow as you know but i talk
to a
cupla utitlities and the bias same as you menioned. ive neutralized bear book
a
bit cuz i cant afford to fite this thing. with deep pockets tho-i scale up
sell
next 2-3 weeks take a bet on 200 ish injections in april and 400 in may-ie
records
  aug/oct-yes-low risk-wasnt substantially more inverted when we were 4 bucks
higher-low risk but not a great reward. oct/nov-yea-wont make much for another
few months on that so it range trades but ill cont to bersd it cuz if end
summer
that strong im always always more bullish the front of winter.
  other thing i wonder is how wide these summer contangos cud get-as everyone
so
bullish futs for the next few weeks at least.
   weather here sucks to day-tree almost fell on me driving into work-close
one,sahud be about 2 ft of white stuff when its said and done. dunno how long
i
can stay but doesnt look all that great for me getting out to steamboat
manana!!

heres a hypothetical.... we agree that demand loss y on y somwhere from 4.5 to
5.0 today, do you guys think that we can see a substantial demand recovery if
prices dont retreat? my ffeeling is no for at least another 90 days or
more.thots?
   any thots on flat px today-im slitely long vs bearsds?


Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/00 09:46 PM -----

	"Rosser, Dianna" <drosser@velaw.com>
	12/27/00 08:45 PM

		 To: "'rwight@milbank.com'" <rwight@milbank.com>, "'mwilson@milbank.com'"
<mwilson@milbank.com>, "'philip.levy@chase.com'" <philip.levy@chase.com>,
"'jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com'" <jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com>,
"'melissa.c.vogel@chase.com'" <melissa.c.vogel@chase.com>,
"'kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com'" <kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com>,
"'renee_r_nadler@fleet.com'" <renee_r_nadler@fleet.com>,
"'richard_aidala@fleet.com'" <richard_aidala@fleet.com>,
"'jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com'" <jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com>,
"'James_r_mcbride@fleet.com'" <James_r_mcbride@fleet.com>,
"'mark_service@fleet.com'" <mark_service@fleet.com>,
"'Sean_o'neill@fleet.com'" <Sean_o'neill@fleet.com>,
"'ian.james@mourant.com'" <ian.james@mourant.com>
		 cc: "'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'" <teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>,
"'joseph.deffner@enron.com'" <joseph.deffner@enron.com>, "Shouse, August"
<AShouse@velaw.com>
		 Subject: marked copies of changed documents

Attached please find marked copies of those documents that have been edited.
Clean copies of all the documents will follow shortly.

If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact August
Shouse or me.

Regards,

Dianna J. Rosser
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Business and International Section
3300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
tel: (713) 758-3688
fax: (713) 615-5899
email: drosser@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<Enron Guaranty (comp. 4 and 5).DOC>>   <<Natural Gas Inventory Forward
Sale Contract (compare 3 and 4).DOC>>   <<V&E Legal Opinion (compare 1 and
2).DOC>>   <<Consent and Agreement (comp. 4 and 5).DOC>>   <<Consent and
Agreement between Enron Corp. and Chase Manhattan, blackline of 3 and
4.DOC>>   <<Confirmation Letter - Natural Gas Forward Sale Contract
(blackline of 2&3).DOC>>

 - Houston_419764_1.DOC
 - Enron Guaranty (comp. 4 and 5).DOC
 - Natural Gas Inventory Forward Sale Contract (compare 3 and 4).DOC
 - V&E Legal Opinion (compare 1 and 2).DOC
 - Consent and Agreement (comp. 4 and 5).DOC
 - Consent and Agreement between Enron Corp. and Chase Manhattan, blackline
of 3 and 4.DOC
 - Confirmation Letter - Natural Gas Forward Sale Contract (blackline of
2&3).DOC


Lorraine,
	This is Southern's Gallup contract.  I've looked at our yellow file we keep down here and the original agreement only allowed alt RP's & DP's within the path, in the direction of flow, at the discounted rate.  Then, I see an amendment to allow them alternate DP's at the CA Border.  I don't see anything else here.  Are you aware of any deals that allowed them to use alt RP's in East of Thoreau?

Ramona,
	Can you ask Dennis to look in Envision &/or pull the official contract file for you and check to see if there are any other amendments?

Thanks,
Lindy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Betancourt, Ramona
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 3:15 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	TW CBS Production Contract

Lindy.

While testing the TMS nomination and scheduling processes that Interface into the new CMS system, I have found a TW Firm contract with Southern Energy Inc. # 26719 that was set up back in May or June of 2000 which has several alt. receipt templates that are outside the primary path. The primay path for this contract is San Juan Bloomfield receipts to Socal Needles as primary delivery. It shows up in production with alt. receipt groups in Central, West Texas, and Panhandle. Is this correct?

Thanks Ramona


Thank you for booking your travel with Continental Airlines.

Your Continental E-Ticket confirmation number is: K4KM6L

For your convenience, click here to view and print your E-Ticket Receipt.
http://www.continental.com/eticket/wreceipt.asp?copnr=K4KM6L&ln=TAYLOR

If your email program does not recognize the Web address above as an
active link, go to http://www.continental.com/eticket/ and enter your
confirmation number and passenger last name.

If you need to make changes to your itinerary call toll free
1-888-815-2665.  To help expedite your request, be sure to have your
confirmation number available.  Please do not reply to this e-mail as it
cannot be answered from this address.

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Still waiting for the mail?

Rain or shine, get your OnePass statements online.

Click here.
http://www.continental.com/erma/promo.asp?promo=opstatements
------------------------------------------------------------
Go The Extra Mile...

Earn a 50% mileage bonus with every paid flight from November 1, 2000,
through December 31, 2000.  Enroll online today at
www.continental.com/extramile to receive an additional 1,000 OnePass bonus
miles!

http://www.continental.com/erma/promo.asp?promo=extramile00
------------------------------------------------------------
Continental Airlines Presidents Club - Sign Up Today & Save

Purchase or renew your Presidents Club membership before November 1, 2000,
and take advantage of the current rates.  For more information or to
purchase a Presidents Club membership, visit continental.com.

http://www.continental.com/erma/promo.asp?promo=pclub
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

We look forward to serving your travel needs again soon.

For information on a variety of our products and services, visit us online
at http://www.continental.com


Theresa Zucha on behalf of
Stacy Dickson-Granmayeh
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St., EB3884
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713/345-4582
Fax:  713/646-3490


You had asked for my input on a response to a letter you received from Tom
Donahue regarding increasing Enron's contribution to the US Chamber to
$100,000.  I have been giving the Chamber a bit of a hard time lately and
wanted you to know why.

I have been in touch with both Tom and his staff over the last year.  Donahue
has done a very good job raising money and getting his membership rolls up,
both in terms of membership and dollar contribution per member.  My
reservation about the Chamber is that they won't take a stand on something
which is in the best interests of the vast majority of their membership if it
will alienate a vocal few.  Electric restructuring was a key example of
this.  There was no doubt where they should have been on the issue, but
instead of embracing retail open access legislation at the federal level they
decided to have a "process".  Naturally, all the utilities volunteered to
participate in the process and outnumbered the nonutility members when it
came time to vote.  The vote supported wholesale, but not retail, reform
(with heavy emphasis on ensuring stranded cost recovery).  Afterwards, the
federal debate shifted solely to wholesale legislation (though this is not
exclusively the Chamber's fault).

Unfortunately, Tom's forceful and competitive approach when it comes to
raising his membership rolls leaves him unwilling to do the right thing if a
few members will be upset.  For Enron it's a bit like paying $100,000 for a
veto right.  The only things the organization pushes for are the things
everyone agrees on in the business community -- eg China PNTR and lower
corporate taxes -- things they will push for whether we pay dues or not (and
things we will add our separate voice to in any event).

As I have explained to the Chamber, Enron makes its money challenging
conventional wisdom, changing the way markets work, and dislocating
incumbents.  Anything important that we stand for is likely to alienate some
members of the business community and the Chamber is unlikely to stand with
us.  They represent the status quo in the business community.  Tom is an
extremely promising leader; he needs to create a new kind of voice for the
business community.  A voice which stands for moving business to the next
level, not just protecting its current position.

Having said all that, the Chamber (particularly its international chapters)
has been useful to us in the past.  In previous years, Donahue himself has
intervened on our behalf with Latin American leaders.  As a consequence, I
have asked them for a proposal which would allow us to remain Chamber members
at a lower dues (and policy participation) level, but with continuing access
to their international activities.  I suggested something in the $25,000
range.  That's why they are approaching you (they want us to double our
current dues to $100,000).

Currently, I am inclined to just withdraw from Chamber membership, but I plan
to defer to Linda Robertson.  I am interested in your insights, or, if you
prefer, you can simply refer them to Linda or me.


claendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 08:19 AM -----

	Andria Stevens@EES
	12/08/2000 05:41 PM

		 To: Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert K
Jones/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES,
Larry Burton/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Norma
Yeverino/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Ruth Ann Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie D
Dever-McCauley/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Friday, December 15, 2000 interview with Kalen Pieper

I have attached the interview schedule/evaluation form and resume for the
Friday, December 15, 2000 interview with Kalen Pieper for the Vice President,
Human Resources position # 106788. Please let me know if this schedule
conflicts with any new appointments, as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Andria Stevens
EES Human Resources