Cary, thanks for the response.  We will keep your name on the list and will
contact you for any spring events.  --Sally

From: Cary M Carrabine@ENRON on 10/23/2000 09:55 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OU Update

I would like to remain on the team, but this fall is very difficult due to
setting up a new business.  Please let me know if
there is anything else I can do to help.

Thanks

Cary

	Sally Beck@ECT
	10/17/2000 04:57 PM

		 To: Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: OU Update

Would you ever be interested in helping us with recruiting at OU?  As you are
probably aware, the analyst programs have been combined into one program, so
we are searching for top candidates to bring in for all rotations within the
analyst program.  Upcoming interviews are for summer interns.  We will be on
campus on Monday, October 30 (just after the OU - Nebraska game).  Let me
know if you are interested or if you have any questions, and we can get you
formally added to the team that is recruiting at OU.

Hope that all is going well in Chicago.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 04:52 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           10/16/2000 06:33 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody
Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES,
Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OU Update

Dear OU Team:

I wanted to send a quick update regarding the rest of the fall recruiting
season:

According to your recruiting guide, we are scheduled to host a Corporate View
on October 19 and 20.  This has been changed to November 10.  This event will
now be co-sponsored (in Houston) with Arthur Andersen and will also involve
students from the Fellows group at Texas A&M.  We were given this opportunity
through Tim Rasnic (our JC Penney Leadership contact at OU) and Dr. Tim
Peterson (the contact for our Texas A&M recruiter).  Details will be sent to
the group as Tim Rasnic finalizes the logistical details between the 2 groups.

Also, we will be conducting Intern Interviews October 30 and 31.  I realize
this falls at a time when many of you are interested in being with your
families (as would I), so please keep in mind that the greater number of
interviewers we have for this event, the sooner we can all get back home to
TRICK-OR-TREAT!!!  We will sort through the candidate resumes once I receive
them from Career Services.

Please let me know as soon as possible if you will be able to help with
interviews on day 1 (October 30).
Just to update you on last week's interviews:
We will be inviting 9 candidates to Super Saturday on November 4.  I will
send their names and contact information to you after each has been notified.

Thanks to each of you for making this season such a success!
I appreciate the time and help you have all provided!

thanks!

lexi
3-4585


Bullshit weasel!!!! Let me see if that is possible. I leave for Raleigh to go
visit Duke on Thusday and don't get back till Friday night, so we will have
to see.


Contrary to popular belief, the people that actually show up to the game do
have other things they can do if they know that the other team members will
not show up.  So, let me know whether or not you will be there.


---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 02:32
PM ---------------------------

RAISLERK@sullcrom.com on 08/11/2000 12:09:12 PM
To: clong@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Memo

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Update on Last Week.doc


Abigale Wool
12451 Louise Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90066
abbewool@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Abigale Wool


As many of you know, I am going to be leaving Enron to pursue new
opportunities.
  I am leaving with regret,  as I have enjoyed working with all of you, and I
believe EBS
  is poised for great success in Asia.   To assist in a smooth transition,  I
have prepared
  this report on  the status of all EBS East Asia regulatory affairs actions
I am working on,
  and my thoughts about next steps.    A list of key contacts is also
provided.    Mark
  Schroeder will reassign pending actions.

   Again, many, many thanks for your support and encouragement and for what I
have
   learned about broadband and EBS from each of you.

1.   Singapore

 (a)  SBO License Application:

        The application was completed in draft in December.   Dan Arzola of
EBS Asia
        has a copy in Houston.   We cannot proceed further on the application
until we
        decide what  legal entity to use.   We have a legal entity (Enron
Broadband
        Services Pte Ltd) set up that encompasses all EBS activities
including bandwidth t
        trading.

        The legal entity that we use in the application will have to pay a 1%
annual gross
        turnover fee unless we get it waived by the regulator on the grounds
that the
        turnover fee was never intended to capture bandwidth trading
revenue.   This
        is a possible option in my opinion as the regulator (IDA) does not
want to be working at cross
        purposes with other parts of the government that wish to provide EBS
with incentives.
        See below.

    (b)  Legal Due Diligence:

        However, before pursuing a waiver from IDA,  we were planning to
complete legal due
        diligence to examine any options for avoiding the fee without a
waiver.
        Donald is of the view (see his Jan 9 e-mail ) that bandwidth trading
has to be
        licensed by the regulator.  ( In Europe, bandwidth trading usually
does not
        require telecom licensing.)   If Donald is correct as he probably is,
there may be
        less need of further legal research  on that point unless perhaps to
confirm absolutely
        that there is no way to shield EBS bandwidth trading from the
turnover fee apart from
        a waiver or reduction of the fee.    For example it is possible  that
Jan Haizmann
        or others may figure out a way to have actual trades escape the fee
(done offshore
        for example).   Jan I believe has some ideas on this that he adanced
in the context
        of Korea.

        I believe it would still be prudent  to proceed as we had planned to
engage
        a law firm here in Singapore (as we have in Hong Kong and Japan) for
the purpose
        of guiding us through these sorts of questions (or at least
confirming our reading)
        and answering the many other questions posed in a matrix developed by
a working
        group headed by Wayne Gardner.   We will likely be needing the firm
anyway at
        some point.

        I have prepared a list of seven law firms engaged in telecoms
practice in Singapore.
        EBS General Counsel is planning to examine its Asia strategy and whom
to send and
        when to engage a firm to complete Wayne's questionnaire and for other
purposes.

         My advice is, after the due diligence is completed or we have at
least confirmed
         that bandwidth trading is required to be in the licensed entity,
probably to go to the IDA and
         discuss the implications of the fee for us.   The contacts I would
suggest discussing this
         with are Andy Haire and Fiona Yeo (see contact list).]      IDA does
not wish to prevent
         EBS's coming to Singapore, and the fee was of course set up without
bandwidth trading
         specifically in mind as a revenue source.   Bandwidth trading was
referenced in the
         Code only later as a result of Enron's comment letters.

  (c)  Arthur D Little consultant proposal to support EBS Pioneer Status
Application

         This 75k proposal is now with us in final form, after undergoing
changes by me
         and two by our Houston tax lawyers.   I was to have gone to ADL
Singapore next
         for a meeting to question them on how much of this they are able to
         do independently without reliance on us.   This was a suggestion
made by
         Jim Ginty of EBS tax to make sure they would not be reprocessing our
info,
         I also intended to get them to pinpoint which of the products would
be quantified,
         rather than a "where appropriate."     Assuming we proceed with this
proposal,
         someone else will need to do this conversation with ADL Singapore.

         I have forwarded the final proposal to Wayne Garder and Mark and
most other
         interested parties earlier this week.

        NB:   Someone needs to be appointed to contact Simon MacCormac at ADL
and explain
        at least our timing and process for getting back to him, as a
courtesy.   I have not
        replied to his final submission as of now.   See contact info at end
of e-mail.

         For background,  the reason I believe EBS needs this work and sought
a consultant
         proposal is that Pioneer Status is typically awarded  to companies
that make major
         dollar, infrastructure, and job-creation expenditures in
Singapore.   Our business
         model does just the opposite.   So, to be awarded Pioneer Status,
which the EDB is
         very willing to consider us for after many months of persuasion,  I
believe we need to
         help EDB demonstrate what the quantitative spin-off benefits are for
Singapore from our
         developing bandwidth trading here (e.g. increased efficiencies of
capacity utilization,
         effect of lower bandwidth prices on attracting investment).   This
is a job for a  development
         economist teamed with someone who knows about bandwidth trading.
To my mind,
         if ADL cannot produce the bandwidth trading specialist we want, it
might be worth it
         to have one of our experts assigned to liaise with  them, and adjust
the contract
         accordingly to reflect what part we are providing.

         One thing the ADL scope of work does not provide for is the actual
completion of
         the Pioneer Status Application - only the supporting economic
analysis.  That is because it is
         proper for us to be the ones outlining our business plan for
Singapore, rather than
         running that information through ADL and charging its overhead.  The
idea is to get
         ADL to perform the quantitative economic development analysis we
cannot do in-house.

    (d)   Direct contact with EDB on EBS's plans

         EDB (Chelsia Lim ) has this week asked EBS to update her on its
business
         plans for Singapore.    I have made sure Craig Clark will take the
responsibility
         for seeing this is handled.   While a courtesy call is fine, I would
advise
         not to brief her formally until EBS has really decided what our
plans are,
         with staffing, etc.   They have been asking for our plans for a
while, and
         are waiting for some specifics when we have them.

2.    Hong Kong

        We have  2 licenses:   IVANS (value added services) and ETS (external
        telecoms services (includes bandwidth trading).

        There are several documents in draft and clearance which need to be
filed
        under these licenses before we are able to operate in Hong Kong.
        The principal ones are (a)  the system configuration plan,   (b) the
tariff for
        sale and trading of circuits under the ETS license (c) the tariff for
Mediacast
        services under the IVANS license, and (later) (d) a tariff for
VOD/EOD to
        be filed under the IVANS license.

        (a)  status of system configuration plan:

        The plan is done in draft and is being held pending a decision to be
         communicated by Roger Estrada within the next week or two as to
whether
         the Lucent 10G equipment described in the plan will be changed to
other
         equipment.    The HK lawyers  (Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance)
have said
         that if we plan to provide other equipment at the outset, we ought
to just
         wait and send in the correct description rather than revise.   If we
do stick with
         the Lucent equipment , we will also need to revise our orginal
license
         application as well (says Michelle Chan)  to include description of
related
         Cisco equipment that was not mentioned in our orginal license
application.

         When the system configuration plan is done in final, we also need to
         change the listed destination in the diagram from "San Jose"  to
"West Coast
         USA,  Japan, Singapore, and Australia".

         There are two copies of the present draft submission typed on the
OFTA forms.
          I have given one to Craig Clark of EBS to carry back to Houston.
The other
         copy is with Annie Ng in our Singapore office.

         When we know what equipment we are going to be using, Tom Wei needs
to
         revise the diagram and also make the changes in destination referred
to above.
         Other small edits need to be made in Appendix A (see Dec 28 e-mail
referenced
         below).   My successor should review the whole package once more
with Michelle
         Chan in final.    Then the final package needs to be cleared by
Anthony Duenner
         and our EBS lawyers before going to Ken Rice or another qualified
Director of
         our Hong Kong company for signature.   After that it goes back to
Michelle Chan
         for filing with OFTA.

         NB:   See Michelle Chan's e-mail of Dec 28, being repeated
separately, for
                  further information.

       (b)   Tariffs for BWTrading under ETS License

        In December in Houston I worked with Bill White and his staff on a
tariff plan for
        bandwidth trading in HK.   Based on a meeting I had with the
regulator in Hong
        Kong,   we agreed to file pro forma ceiling prices rather than an
entirely new
        and variable system which the regulator insisted we not do.
Ceiling  prices
        were developed and submitted to Michelle Chan for review.

        Along with the prices we are required to submit our Terms and
Conditions.   For
        that I used EBS General Terms and Conditions (GTC's) for trading
obtained from
        Robbi Rossi and Michelle Heard.  Mike Grimes  has a set as well.

        Present status:  Right now a dialogue is under way between Michelle
Chan and
        Robbi Rossi as to whether it is sufficient to file the GTC's alone or
whether
        certain exhibits, service level agreements, and confirmations
referred to in
        the GTC's must also be filed.   There are other questions being
discussed in
        that channel  such as how to handle variations in the terms based on
        commercial dynamics.     All these e-mails will be  forwarded.   Once
these
        issues related to the GTCs are resolved, the tariff for bandwidth
trading should
        be filed, going through Michelle Chan.

        NB:  See Michelle Chan e-mail of 1/09/01 which being forwarded
separately.

     (c)  Tariff for Media Cast under IVANS license:

       I worked with Leroy Ho and Ken Wang in December and we submitted the
main
       part of the Media Cast tariff to Michelle Chan.   However, we still
need to get the
       Terms and Conditions for Media Cast from Robbi Rossi or Michelle Heard
and
       attach them to the tariff diagrams and submit them to Michelle Chan.

       NB:   See my e-mail to Michelle Chan of Dec 21 which being repeated.
       Someone needs to work with EBS legal to get the T and C's for Media
Cast to Michelle
       or to set up direct channel between EBS legal and Michelle Chan as in
       the case of the exchanges on the T and C's for Bandwidth trading
referred
       to above.

      (d)   Overall change of responsibility for EBS Regulatory HK

        Michael,  or whomever will be taking over these responsibilities,
should
        get from Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance Hong Kong a fresh copy of
        Alison Lindsay's letter to Xi Xi of October 2000 stating that we
received
        our licenses and setting forth in detail all of the requirements.
This is the
        master document ("bible") on compliance under our licenses and will
catch any
        detail not included above.   For example:

            - my successor should also file a new form with OFTA,  the Hong
Kong
              regulator (form is included in the attachments to the letter)
naming
              himself the point of contact, replacing me.    Michelle Chan
can forward
              the letter to the regulator.

           -  we will need to be selecting an independent auditor to certify
certain routine
              reports we may need to file in future.   I have not started on
that.

3.    Korea

       Robbi Rossi needs to call Kim and Chang (law firm we use in Korea)
       to authorize them to research and provide advice to us on how to
handle
       the apparent regulatory impediment to Bandwidth Trading in Korea that
       we identified during my November trip.

       Once Kim and Chang starts work on this, someone from regulatory should
       be made available to help guide Kim and Chang on our regulatory
       questions, in coordination with Robbi Rossi.

       The key e-mails are (a) one from me outlining the overall problem and
        some suggestions for dealing with it ;  (b) one from Jan Haizmann
with
        some additional and in some cases alternative suggestions on how
        to deal with it,  (c)  two from Jae Moo Lee in Korea with additional
        points of view.  These will be forwarded.

  4.   Japan

       Our regulatory consultant is Art Yanagawa.   Contact info below.  Mike
Grimes
       and I have been in meetings with him and  Mike is fully briefed to
carry on the
       on-the-ground  part of contacts with Art.   Art also responds to
Donald and
       Roger Estrada and relies on them for guidance and input.

      At some point it should be thought through who should be the point
person
      to manage  this contract and approve payments, or decide to leave things
      as they are with approvals done in Houston.    The present system works
but
      it is not clear to me who is responsible for what.

      Art has prepared the amendment to our Special Type 2  license to add
      service to other destinations.   The latest status was that he was
holding
      the amendment over the holidays while clarifying some points raised by
      Mike Grimes.    Someone needs to be assigned responsibility for
      getting the amendment through.

      General Concern:

      A more general regulatory concern for us in Japan is that our
consultant
      advises us that we cannot use the term bandwidth trading  in
      communications with the government because it is not something
      contemplated in the Telecom Business Law,  so is prohibited if
      stated as we would state it elsewhere.

      We therefore are having to go through elaborate contortions to make
      what we are planning to do actually look like we are doing something
      else.    I admit that I agree with the approach we are taking for now
and
      can offer nothing better for the immediate term.

      However, I would say that long term we are running some risks.    If we
      are going to make Japan  one of the centerpieces of our  Asia EBS
      strategy,   I think we need to consider devoting more full time EBS
      regulatory resources to Japan exclusively.

       The allocation problem is that whatever regulatory resources we apply
       have to focus on  immediate license amendment  and operational
       questions that drive out time to work effectively on long term
       issues such as how to go about amending the Telecommunications
       Business Law  to allow bandwidth trading explicitly.    This would seem
       important to reduce long term risks to our business strategy.

5.    "Digital Divide"

       I had been giving intermittent support to helping Scott Yeager and
Justin
       Cornett of EBS, and Will Reed of Technology for All, figure out how
       to expand the concept of Technology for All to Asia.    The strategy
       was to utilize some of Japan's $15 billion pledge of funds to support
       digital divide activities in Asia - to support the expansion into Asia
of
       the EBS-supported TFA model.    This work will cease unless it can
       be picked up by Laura Lannarone of corporate social responsbility
       or Steve Burns of the DC office.

6.   KEY CONTACTS for operational items in this memo:

(a)   SBO License:  InfoCom Development Authority of Singapore

        (1)  Ms. Fiona Yeo, Asst Dir Competiton  - 211-1824
        (2)  Mr. Andrew Haire - Senior Director Policy and Regulation -
211-1731
        (3)  Ms Hema Ramnani - Manager- Policy   211-1860
        (4)  Ms Aileen Chia, Deputy Director, Economic Regulation - 211-1883
        (5)  Ms Ng Cher Keng, Director, Policy - 211-1828

(b)  Pioneer Tax Status:  Economic Development Board

       (1)  Chelsia LIM - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6676
              <chelsial@edb.gov.sg>
       (2)  Bernard NEE -  Head, Infocomms and Media - 832-6964
       (3)  Sean LOW - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6260
              <seanlow@edb.gov.sg>
       (4)   LEE Eng Keat - same as above - 832-6006

(c)  Arthur D Little proposal

        (1)  Simon MacCormac - Associate Director
              297-2300
              <maccormac.simon@adlittle.com>

        (2) Peter J Connell - Vice President
               207-2300
             <connell.peter@adlittle.com>

(d)  Hong Kong License filings:

       (1)  Michelle Chan  852-2825-8888
              <michelle.chan@cliffordchance.com>

       (2)  Alison Lindsay
               <alison.lindsay@cliffordchance.com>

        (3)  OFTA:  M.H. Au
               Senior Asst Director (Regulation)
               852-2961-6688
               <mhau@ofta.gov.hk>

(e)  Japan Telecom regulatory consultant to  EBS:

       Art Yanagawa
       81-3-5418-7056
       <arthur@asianet.co.jp>

David

       for example, the option of whether we can break bandwidth trading
functions
       out of the entity


We got to check this one out - see how it works.

Harry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crenshaw, Shirley
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:09 PM
To:	Associate & Analyst Program; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert; Davis, Mark Dana; Wang, Steve; Mack, Iris; Meyn, Jim; Hiemstra, Nick; Seksaria, Rahul; Heintzelman, Pete; Baughman, Edward D.; May, Tom; Dean, Anne; Dean, Clint; Gulmeden, Utku; Gulmeden, Utku; Will, John; Will, Lloyd; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Cross, Edith; Andrews, Naveen; Imai, Rika; McMichael Jr., Ed; Breese, Mark; Cisneros, Michelle D.; Khanna, Sanjeev; Zhang, Michelle; Yang, Zhiyun; Adam Stevens (E-mail); Alex Huang (E-mail); Amitava Dhar (E-mail); Anguel Grigorov (E-mail); Anita DuPont (E-mail); Bob Lee (E-mail); Chonawee Supatgiat (E-mail); Christopher Pernoud (E-mail); Gwyn Koepke (E-mail); Heather A. Johnson (E-mail); Jaesoo Lew (E-mail); Jason Sokolov (E-mail); Jose Marquez (E-mail); Joseph Hrgovcic (E-mail); Karthik Rajan (E-mail); Kenneth Deng (E-mail); Kevin G Moore (E-mail); Lance Cunningham (E-mail); Leann Walton (E-mail); Martin Lin (E-mail); Maureen Raymond (E-mail); Mauricio Mora (E-mail); Mike A Roberts (E-mail); Mitra Mujica (E-mail); Nelson Neale (E-mail); Osman Sezgen (E-mail); Paulo Issler (E-mail); Pinnamaneni Krishnarao (E-mail); Pravas Sud (E-mail); Praveen Mellacheruvu (E-mail); Rabi De (E-mail); Rakesh Bharati (E-mail); Sandeep Kohli (E-mail); Sarah Wooddy (E-mail); Seksan Kiatsupaibul (E-mail); Sevil Yaman (E-mail); Shalesh Ganjoo (E-mail); Shane Green (E-mail); Shravan Chopra (E-mail); Sofya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Sriram Vasudevan (E-mail); Steve Bennett (E-mail); Tanya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Therese Candella (E-mail); Tom Barkley (E-mail); Tom Halliburton (E-mail); Vasant Shanbhogue (E-mail); Vince J Kaminski (E-mail); Wichai Narongwanich (E-mail); William Smith (E-mail); Zimin Lu (E-mail)
Subject:	Presentation Announcement

You are invited to attend the following presentation:

PSIM: A Power Simulation Tool

PSIM is a proprietary model developed by Enron Research Group.

?	It takes Power, Gas, Weather and demand information into consideration and
	uses Monte-Carlo simulation to assess the expected deal value and risk distribution.
?	It evaluates complex electricity related contracts such
as Full Requirement  and load following contract.
?	It also provides a valuation tool for power assets and asset management deals.
?	It works for both deal specific or portfolio issues.

In this presentation we will show how the model can be used to deal with various types
of contracts, explain the model structure and point out further applications.

Date:		October 30, 2001
Time: 	4:00 pm
Location: 	EB5C2
Presenter: 	Alex Huang

Registration is required for a head count.
Please call Shirley Crenshaw at 3-5290 to register.

Pizza and soft drinks will be served.


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034938&Page=
MyReq.


Phillip,

It will go along this lines: (Conservative)

*****************************************************
We pay "0" going forward
We have already played 300K in 3Q2001
Outstanding bill for $27,740 will hit Enron Q1, 2002

Enron and surviving entity will have the right to use it internally

We value Enrons SME time @ around 300K

Accenture will have the right to use it internally and modify the product at its will for internal & external use.

This arrangement will void 900K Enrons Revenue from Accenture

Enron would receive 0% royalty on all external sales.  I was thinking to stay away from royalty as we do not know what will be new company position on this matter. Also,  I do not think Accenture will want to enter into partnership structure with a ghost company unless we get Dinergy involved.

***********************************************************************

If we do not reach the agreement: 1. Terminate and pay around 500-600k (estimate)  The payment could be deferred in to 2Q 2002 or
				 2. Continue "as is" with payment differed for 90 days or merger.

We are sending Accenture official notice as of tomorrow we have 10 business days to workout solution or terminate.

Any comments or suggestions?

Regards,

Yevgeny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Phillip K.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:32 PM
To:	Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject:	RE: BRM Case & Options

Yevgeny,

Please send me an email describing the zero option so I can pass it along to the other SME's.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frolov, Yevgeny
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Cc:	McDaniel, Kirk; Coleman, Brad; O'rourke, Tim
Subject:	BRM Case & Options
Importance:	High

Phillip,

I am following up to our BRM conversation from Friday.  Obviously it is a valid questions to ask and as you requested I am attaching two documents: one summarizing the options and  2nd cash flow impact.  In the cash flow impact Case 2 & 3 already account for additional cut of 100k from existing cost.  (it comes from Expenses such as projected traveling 30K+Cut in Media 20K + Cut in sim exercises 50K)  The cut in sim exercises need to be confirmed with you. A total of two sims could be cut one.  Accenture will address this question tomorrow during the meeting.  Also,  I will ask them to cut the meeting by 10 min, thus we can go over the documents and can answer your questions.  I am not sure what is Tim's schedule for tomorrow, but at least Kirk and myself will be around.

Obviously cutting sims is not the best options but we are considering all alternatives at this time.  We will continue to review how to cut labor and expenses.
One question that it would be good if you think about it before we meet is as follow.  Is BRM "core" to the Enron for next few months or new organization?  Please consider the costs of finishing this project.

Sincerely,

Yevgeny Frolov
713-345-8250 w
 << File: BRM Cash Flow Cases.xls >>  << File: BRM Contingency Numbers Rev3.xls >>


If you cannot read today's e-Journal, please visit this link:?
http://www.michbar.org/e-journal/053001.html Or to receive a plain text
version, please send an e-mail to lyris@lists.michbar.org? In the body,
type:? unsubscribe ejournal and on the next line type:? subscribe
ejournal-text
?

[IMAGE]

Ad 1

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

The  e-Journal is available to members of the State Bar of Michigan at no
additional  charge thanks in part to the generous support of our advertisers.
Please  be sure to support these State Bar partners and visit their Internet
sites  frequently for information about their products and services.  	?

		[IMAGE]

		State  Bar of Michigan e-Journal for Wednesday, May 30, 2001

		?qlink

		?Use  our specifically designed hypertext links --Quicklinks --  to jump to
the desired area of today's
		e-Journal

		?cases
		Cases  affecting the following practice areas are summarized  in today's
e-Journal:

		Civil  Rights
		Constitutional  Law
		Criminal  Law
		Family  Law
		Media  Law
		Real  Property
		Tax

		Special  Note: Today's  e-Journal includes summaries of one Court of Appeals
published  opinion and two U. S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals opinions  in
the following practice areas: Civil Rights, Criminal  Law, and Real Property.

		[IMAGE]

		?editorial
		Please click  here to read today's Other  Editorial

		Administrative  Order 2001-3*Security Policy for the Michigan Supreme  Court

		Attorney  Discipline Notices

		[IMAGE]

		Tell  Us What You Think
		Visit Our New Townhall Forum Electronic Bulletin Board

		?classified
		Listings  in the following areas are in today's Classified  Section:

		Confidential  Records Destruction
		Elections
		Expert  Witness
		Lawsuit  Financials
		Legal  Research
		Office  Space Available
		Positions  Available
		Services
		Typing  Services

		?fieldspractice

		Need  to refer a case? See today's Fields of Practice  Listings:

		ADR/Arbitration/Mediation

		Administrative  Law
		Adoption

		Alternative  Dispute Resolution

		Antitrust/Advertising/Trade  Regulation

		Appeals

		Appellate  Law

		Automotive  Warranty Law

		Business  & Taxation

		Construction  Law

		Copyrights

		Criminal  Law

		Environmental  Law

		Family  Law

		Federal  False Claims (Qui Tam) Actions
		Health  Law

		Hospital  & Medical Negligence

		Immigration  & Naturalization

		Immigration  Law

		Insurance  Law

		Intellectual  Property Law

		Labor  & Employment Law

		Litigation

		Medical  Malpractice

		Real  Estate

		Special  Education Law

		Tax  Litigation & Disputes

		Transportation  Law

		Worker's  Compensation

		?newsandmoves

		See  this week's News  & Moves for information about your colleagues.

		barevents?

		See  today's  Bar  Events section for news about upcoming programs and
activities.

		case  summaries

		Civil  Rights

		Back  to Quicklinks

		This  summary also appears under Real Property

		Issues:  Alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and analogous state
anti-discrimination housing provisions; Whether the landlord met  its burden
in attempting to provide reasonable accommodations for  the tenant with a
known mental disability; Whether the district  court improperly drew
inferences against the nonmoving party
		Court:  U.S. Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit
		Case  Name: Groner v. Golden Gate Gardens Apartments
		e-Journal  Number: 10343
		Judge(s):  Gilman, Siler, and Duggan

		Deciding an  issue of first impression in the circuit, the court held that a
plaintiff in a Fair Housing Act case has the burden of proof to  establish
the reasonableness of a proposed accommodation. Since  landlord-Golden Gate
had a legitimate interest in ensuring the quiet  enjoyment of all its
tenants, and there was no showing of  a reasonable accommodation that would
have enabled the plaintiff,  who suffered from schizophrenia and depression,
to remain in his  apartment without significantly disturbing another tenant,
plaintiff  failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to a
violation  of his rights under either the Fair Housing Act or the equivalent
state laws. Plaintiff allegedly screamed and slammed doors within  his
apartment, causing the tenant in the apartment above his to  make repeated
complaints to Golden Gate's manager. The parties attempted  unsuccessfully to
resolve the issue over a period of time, during  which Golden Gate
soundproofed plaintiff's front door and attempted  to work with his social
worker to resolve plaintiff's behavior.  Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Constitutional  Law

		Back  to Quicklinks

		This summary  also appears under Media Law

		Issues:  The First Amendment right of the press to gather information;
Whether the court clerk could grant access to identity of trial  jurors
		Court:  U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan
		Case  Name: In re Bay City Times
		e-Journal  Number: 10328
		Judge(s):  Lawson

		Since the subject  of the request (release of the names and communities of
residence  of the trial jurors in the underlying criminal case) constituted
matters which were already in the public record, and releasing the
information would not unduly infringe on the jurors' privacy interests,  the
court granted the petitioner-newspaper's request. The underlying  criminal
case involved the former superintendent of the city wastewater  treatment
plant. The jury returned a verdict on the charges of violation  of the Clean
Water Act. During voir dire each prospective  juror announced his or her name
and community of residence. The  trial attracted the attention of the local
media. After the verdict  was returned, a reporter requested the names of the
trial jurors  from the court clerk. Thereafter, petitioner requested an
order  for the disclosure of the jurors' names and communities of residence,
but not their telephone numbers or home addresses. The request was  measured
and confined to matters within the public record, and its  disclosure would
not compromise juror privacy.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Criminal  Law

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Order compelling defendant to produce reports created by his  expert
witnesses when no such reports were created or existed; MCR  6.201; Trial
court,s authority to modify the court rules
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Published)
		Case  Name: People v. Phillips
		e-Journal  Number: 10346
		Judge(s):  Per Curiam ) Holbrook, Jr., Hood, and Griffin

		The trial court  erred in ordering defendant to disclose to the prosecutor
reports  created by his expert witnesses when no such reports were created
or existed, and the prosecutor was not entitled to the unwritten
observations of defendant,s expert witnesses. The plain language  of the
applicable court rule provided only that reports "produced"  by defendant,s
experts were subject to disclosure, and "reports"  necessarily meant only
written reports that have actually been produced.  The court held that there
is no requirement for an expert to create  a physical report, and an expert
may testify based solely on observations  obtained at trial. The trial court
also did not show why good cause  existed to modify the court rule in this
case. Reversed and remanded.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Writ of habeas corpus pursuant to o 2254; Right to a  timely parole
violation hearing; Granting or rescinding of good  time sentence credits; Due
process; Michigan Department of Corrections  (MDOC)
		Court:  U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan
		Case  Name: Moore v. Hofbauer
		e-Journal  Number: 10330
		Judge(s):  Tarnow

		Petitioner,s  request for a writ of habeas corpus was denied and the
petition  dismissed because his parole revocation hearing was held within  a
reasonable time after he was taken into custody, and he was not  improperly
denied or deprived good time credits. Although petitioner,s  revocation
hearing occurred 49 days after he was available for MDOC  custody, instead of
the 45 days provided by state statute, the hearing  was held within a
reasonable time. The hearing, held within two  months after petitioner was
taken into custody on the parole violator  warrant, was presumptively
reasonably timely, and petitioner failed  to show prejudice. The warden,s
decision not to grant petitioner  good time credits for the period during
which petitioner tested  positive for controlled substances and was a parole
absconder, was  a reasonable exercise of discretion.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Admissibility of victim's statements about abuse to police officer
and her mother
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: People v. Denton
		e-Journal  Number: 10335
		Judge(s):  Memorandum - McDonald, Smolenski, and Kelly

		Although the  trial court abused its discretion in allowing a police officer
to  testify under MRE 803(2) as to what the victim told her about the  abuse,
the officer's testimony was admissible under MRE 801(d)(1)(B)  to rebut an
implied charge of recent fabrication or improper motive  on the part of the
victim. The evidence did not fall within the  excited utterance exception to
the hearsay rule because the statements  were neither spontaneous nor made
while the victim was still under  the influence of the excitement caused by
the abuse. Defendant's  trial theory was that the victim had fabricated the
alleged abuse  and had lied because she resented his attempts to discipline
her.  The victim's prior consistent statement tended to rebut those claims.
Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Sentencing of a second habitual offender; Jurisdiction to
resentence  defendant; Applicability of MCL 771.1; MSA 28.1131(1); Right to
a speedy trial and delayed sentencing; Proportionality of sentence
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: People v. Phillips
		e-Journal  Number: 10313
		Judge(s):  Per Curiam ) White, Cavanagh, and Talbot

		Defendant,s  sentence as a second habitual offender was supported by the
facts  of the case, and his age and his ineligibility for disciplinary
credits as an habitual offender, which meant that he had to serve  his entire
minimum sentence before becoming eligible for parole,  did not negate that.
Defendant,s argument that the trial court did  not have jurisdiction to
resentence him failed because the statute  upon which he relied did not apply
to his case, and even if it did,  there was good cause for the delay. From
the time leave was denied  by the Supreme Court, sentencing was delayed for
approximately one  year and four months. Defendant filed a motion to quash
resentencing  that caused resentencing to be adjourned, and after the motion
was  heard and denied, resentencing took place within 30 days. Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Habitual offender charge based on prior conviction that was a
felony  and at time of OUIL conviction constituted a misdemeanor;
Ineffective  assistance of counsel
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: People v. Piotrowski
		e-Journal  Number: 10332
		Judge(s):  Memorandum - Jansen, Zahra, and Owens

		The trial court  did not err by using defendant's prior conviction to convict
him  as a second habitual offender because the offense is now classified  as
a misdemeanor. Defendant claimed that use of the prior conviction  in this
manner violated the ex post facto clauses of the  United States and Michigan
Constitutions. The court disagreed and  affirmed defendant's conviction as a
second habitual offender and  the sentence imposed pursuant to that
conviction. A sentencing court  may use a prior conviction of a crime that
was classified as a felony  at the time it was committed to enhance the
sentence for a subsequent  felony conviction, even though the prior crime has
been reclassified  as a misdemeanor. Defendant's prior conviction of failing
to return  rental property was a felony at the time he committed the
offense,  therefore the trial court properly used it to sentence him as a
second habitual offender. Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  The trial court's refusal to accept guilty plea; Whether the  trial
court may reject pleas to reduced charges; Waiver
		Court:   Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		 Case  Name: People v. Winbush
		e-Journal  Number: 10333
		Judge(s):  Memorandum - McDonald, Smolenski, and Kelly

		The trial court  did not commit reversible error when it refused to accept
defendant's  guilty plea to a probation violation. The petition charging
defendant  with probation violation contained six allegations. The
prosecutor  indicated that if defendant pleaded guilty to one allegation,
she  would drop the others. The trial court disapproved of that procedure
and required the parties to proceed with a hearing. A defendant  does not
have an absolute right to have a guilty plea accepted and  the court may
reject a plea in the exercise of its sound discretion.  The trial court may
also reject pleas to reduced charges. Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Motion to dismiss based on the grounds that defendant,s statements
were not "true threats," and therefore were protected speech; Knowingly
transmitting a threat to kidnap in interstate commerce in violation  of 18
U.S.C. o 875(c); Knowingly transmitting a threat to injure  in interstate
commerce in violation of o 875(c); Making interstate  telephone calls that
were lewd, indecent, obscene, and lascivious,  with the intent to abuse,
harass, and annoy another person in violation  of 47 U.S.C. o 223(a)(1)(A)
and (B)
		Court:  U.S. Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit
		Case  Name: United States v. Landham
		e-Journal  Number: 10344
		Judge(s):  Suhrheinrich, Moore, and Edmunds

		The district  court erred in failing to dismiss Count Three of the
indictment  alleging that defendant knowingly transmitted a threat to kidnap
in interstate commerce. The statement "You will not have Priscilla  by her
second birthday, because I'm going to have all your children  . . . . You
will not have Priscilla to raise. . . I'm going to get  her," contained no
communication containing a direct threat  to kidnap, nor would a reasonable
observer in the victim,s shoes  perceive it as an indirect threat. The
defendant and the victim  were embroiled in a divorce proceeding. The victim
had obtained  a Domestic Violence Order removing defendant from the home and
barring  him from contact with his daughter. Defendant,s statement, "I'm
going to get her," in context, referred to the custody battle during  the
divorce proceeding. There was no allegation that defendant had  ever
attempted to abduct the child in the past. Defendant could  not have legally
been charged with kidnapping since Priscilla was  his biological daughter and
his parental rights had not been terminated.  Defendant,s convictions were
reversed and remanded.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Family  Law

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Termination of parental rights; Whether petitioner made reasonable
attempts to reunify the family; Sufficiency of the referee's findings
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: In re Balowski
		e-Journal  Number: 10334
		Judge(s):  Memorandum - McDonald, Smolenski, and Kelly

		Although respondent-father  complied with some aspects of the parent/agency
agreement, the trial  court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory
grounds  for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence
and that the evidence did not show that termination of respondent's  parental
rights was clearly not in the children's best interests.  Respondent claimed
that petitioner failed to make reasonable efforts  to reunify the family,
however those deficiencies did not involve  the principal issue leading to
termination, which was respondent's  failure to successfully address his
substance abuse problem. Affirmed

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Termination of parental rights under oo 19b(3)(g) and (j)
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: In re DJH
		e-Journal  Number: 10339
		Judge(s):  Memorandum ) Collins, Hoekstra, and Gage

		The trial court  did not err in concluding that clear and convincing evidence
supported  termination of respondent-mother,s parental rights. The record
showed  that respondent and her children shared a close bond. However, it
also showed that respondent continued to have contact with and marry  her
boyfriend after she knew of his violent tendencies and that  he likely
injured her children, and after the court ordered that  he have no contact
with the children. Although respondent later  divorced her husband, and
testified that she was no longer involved  with him, other trial testimony
indicated that she did continue  to be involved with him. The trial court,s
findings indicated that  it did not credit respondent,s testimony, and the
court found nothing  in the record to suggest that the trial court clearly
erred in that  regard. Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Termination of parental rights under oo 19b(3)(b)(i), (b)(ii),  (g),
and (j)
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: In re M.J.C.R.
		e-Journal  Number: 10341
		Judge(s):  Memorandum ) Holbrook, Jr., Hood, and Griffin

		Even if the  family court erred in terminating respondent-mother,s parental
rights  under o 19b(3)(g), the error was harmless because the remaining
statutory grounds with regard to her were established with clear  and
convincing evidence. The evidence indicated that the mother  was in a
position where she should have known of the sexual abuse  of her daughter by
her husband, respondent-father, her daughter,s  stepfather. She was well
aware of the physical abuse of both children  by the father, yet continued to
reside with him, exposing the children  to further abuse. The mother also had
a history of emotional and  psychological problems, including several suicide
attempts in front  of the children. Termination of both respondents, parental
rights  was affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Termination of parental rights under oo 19b(3)(d) and (j); Whether
respondent-failure to fulfill the terms of a transition plan to  regain
custody due to the lack of necessary help and referrals
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: In re Roe
		e-Journal  Number: 10319
		Judge(s):  Per Curiam ) Doctoroff, Saad, and Wilder

		There was clear  and convincing evidence that respondent-mother failed to
comply  with the placement and transition plan to regain custody of the
minor child after the child was placed in a limited guardianship.  Although
respondent did eventually complete parenting classes and  undergo a
psychiatric examination, she failed to secure adequate  housing for the
child, did not demonstrate any financial ability  to support the child, did
not participate in counseling, and did  not take her medications for a
diagnosed psychotic disorder. There  was no merit to respondent,s claim that
her failure to fulfill the  terms of the plan was the fault of the probate
court. Termination  of respondent,s parental rights under both statutory
grounds relied  upon by the family court was affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Termination of parental rights under oo 19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and  (j)
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: In re Walker
		e-Journal  Number: 10342
		Judge(s):  Memorandum ) White, Cavanagh, and Talbot

		The family  court did not clearly error in terminating respondent-mother,s
parental  rights because the statutory bases for termination were
established  by clear and convincing evidence. Respondent failed to
substantially  comply with the treatment plan and work toward reunification
with  her children. Respondent failed to obtain and maintain suitable
housing for herself and the children, and showed an inability to  control and
supervise the children, resulting in harm to them. She  did not interact with
the children during visitation, she failed  to obtain and maintain legal
income, and did not seek psychological  counseling as required by the
treatment plan. Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Media  Law

		Back  to Quicklinks

		This summary  also appears under Constitutional Law

		Issues:  The First Amendment right of the press to gather information;
Whether the court clerk could grant access to identity of trial  jurors
		Court:  U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan
		Case  Name: In re Bay City Times
		e-Journal  Number: 10328
		Judge(s):  Lawson

		Since the subject  of the request (release of the names and communities of
residence  of the trial jurors in the underlying criminal case) constituted
matters which were already in the public record, and releasing the
information would not unduly infringe on the jurors' privacy interests,  the
court granted the petitioner-newspaper's request. The underlying  criminal
case involved the former superintendent of the city wastewater  treatment
plant. The jury returned a verdict on the charges of violation  of the Clean
Water Act. During voir dire each prospective  juror announced his or her name
and community of residence. The  trial attracted the attention of the local
media. After the verdict  was returned, a reporter requested the names of the
trial jurors  from the court clerk. Thereafter, petitioner requested an
order  for the disclosure of the jurors' names and communities of residence,
but not their telephone numbers or home addresses. The request was  measured
and confined to matters within the public record, and its  disclosure would
not compromise juror privacy.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Real  Property

		Back  to Quicklinks

		This summary  also appears under Civil Rights

		Issues:  Alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and analogous state
anti-discrimination housing provisions; Whether the landlord met  its burden
in attempting to provide reasonable accommodations for  the tenant with a
known mental disability; Whether the district  court improperly drew
inferences against the nonmoving party
		Court:  U.S. Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit
		Case  Name: Groner v. Golden Gate Gardens Apartments
		e-Journal  Number: 10343
		Judge(s):  Gilman, Siler, and Duggan

		Deciding an  issue of first impression in the circuit, the court held that a
plaintiff in a Fair Housing Act case has the burden of proof to  establish
the reasonableness of a proposed accommodation. Since  landlord-Golden Gate
had a legitimate interest in ensuring the quiet  enjoyment of all its
tenants, and there was no showing of  a reasonable accommodation that would
have enabled the plaintiff,  who suffered from schizophrenia and depression,
to remain in his  apartment without significantly disturbing another tenant,
plaintiff  failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to a
violation  of his rights under either the Fair Housing Act or the equivalent
state laws. Plaintiff allegedly screamed and slammed doors within  his
apartment, causing the tenant in the apartment above his to  make repeated
complaints to Golden Gate's manager. The parties attempted  unsuccessfully to
resolve the issue over a period of time, during  which Golden Gate
soundproofed plaintiff's front door and attempted  to work with his social
worker to resolve plaintiff's behavior.  Affirmed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		Tax

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Issues:  Judgment of Tax Tribunal revising the true cash value, assessed,
and taxable values of petitioner,s property; Burden of proof; Lack  of
evidence
		Court:  Michigan Court of Appeals (Unpublished)
		Case  Name: Muscio v. Commerce Twp.
		e-Journal  Number: 10340
		Judge(s):  Memorandum ) McDonald, Smolenski, and Kelly

		The tribunal,s  decision revising the true cash value, assessed, and taxable
values  of petitioner,s property was not supported by competent, material,
and substantial evidence on the record since petitioner presented  no
evidence of the true cash value of the property under any of  the recognized
valuation methods. Petitioner contended only that  the assessed value should
be cut in half because his neighbors built  a garage that encroached on the
street, paved a portion of the street,  and used it as a driveway, and
petitioner was unable to obtain relief  in court. He presented no evidence to
support his contention that  his property value in fact decreased therefore,
he failed to satisfy  his burden of proof. The tribunal decision constituted
an error  of law. Reversed.

		Full  Text Opinion

		fields  of practice listings

		ADR/Arbitration/Mediation

		ASHER N.  TILCHIN, a  member of the American College of Civil Trial Mediators
and Michigan  Arbitration and Mediation Association provides mediation for
pre,  early, and matured lawsuits. He has been a successful mediator since
1991. Tilchin also provides arbitration services as a single or  multi-panel
arbitrator. Cases involving construction, real estate,  commercial
transactions, and legal malpractice invited. Asher N.  Tilchin, 31731
Northwestern Hwy., Suite 106, Farmington Hills, MI  48334, (248)855-0995 or
Fax (248) 855-0850, e-mail antilchin@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Administrative  Law

		JAMES R. VIVENTI, James R Viventi PLLC, 3670 Powderhorn  Drive, Okemos, MI
48864-5924, Phone: (517) 381-0670, FAX: (517)  381-0671.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Adoption

		MONICA FARRIS LINKNER, Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz,  PC, 2000 Town
Center, Suite 900, Southfield, MI 48075-1100, Phone:  (248) 746-4011, FAX:
(248) 936-1976, e-mail: mlinkner@s4online.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Alternative  Dispute Resolution

		DONNA CRAIG, Donna Craig & Associates PLC, 999 Haynes Street,  Suite 245,
Birmingham, MI 48009, Phone: (248) 682-7750, FAX: (248)  682-2376, e-mail:
craigassoc@earthlink.net.  Visit www.adr-resource.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Antitrust/Advertising/Trade  Regulation

		DAVID G.  CHARDAVOYNE specializes  in the regulation of business competition,
including: antitrust  law, unfair competition, and the regulation of
advertising, labeling,  and other trade practices. Former Chairperson of
State Bar antitrust  and trade regulation section, more than 15 years'
experience in  this field. Will consult regarding antitrust issues
(monopolies,  mergers, price fixing, exclusive dealing, tying arrangements,
price  discrimination, dealer termination, market allocation); premerger
notice filings under Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; discussions with State  and
Federal regulatory agencies (FTC, Justice Department, Attorney  General);
compliance with laws regulating advertising (substantiation  of claims,
product labels, consumer price displays); and all other  matters relating to
business competition. David G. Chardavoyne,  26755 La Muera Ave., Farmington
Hills, MI 48334-4613, (248) 477-6308,  e-mail chardavoyne@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Appeals

		LAURIE S. LONGO, 214 South Main, Suite 210, Ann Arbor, MI  48104-2122, Phone:
(734) 913-5619, e-mail: 42203@msn.com.  Visit http://michiganappeals.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Appellate  Law

		SAFFORD & BAKER, PLLC, 40900 Woodward Avenue, Suite 110, Bloomfield  Hills,
MI 48304, Phone: (248) 646-9100, FAX: (248) 646-9102. Visit
www.saffordbaker.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Automobile  Warranty Law

		LIBLANG  & ASSOCIATES:  Specializing in "Lemon Law", UCC, Magnuson-Moss,
Odometer  Fraud and Consumer Protection Act. Available for trials,
consultations  or referrals. Cases accepted statewide. Over 17 years and
5,000  cases. Michigan's most experienced lemon law attorneys, Dani K.
Liblang and Scott J. Sinkwitts. Please call (248) 540-9270 or e-mail
NoLemons@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Business  & Taxation

		LAW OFFICES  OF RALPH W. PEZDA.  Oakland County practitioner with an LL.M.
degree in taxation from  New York University will assist your clients or firm
with taxation,  business, interdisciplinary, and white collar criminal
matters.  Referrals paid. 27700 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 411, Southfield,  MI
48034. (248) 352-5632. E-mail address: rwp@cdlcorp.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Construction  Law

		JOHN V.  TOCCO, attorney,  construction engineer, and civil engineering
professor, with over  twenty years experience in the construction industry,
provides mediation  and arbitration services for all construction matters.
Also provides  litigation support and claims analysis. Cases accepted
statewide.  Call (313) 406-2040 for CV, or review Profile at
www.johntocco.com  E-mail john@johntocco.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Copyrights

		CAROL R. SHEPHERD, Arborlaw Associates, PLLC, 320 S Main  St, PO Box 8403,
Ann Arbor, MI 48107-8403, Phone: (734) 668-4646,  FAX: (734) 822-4646,
e-mail: shepherd@arborlaw.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Criminal  Law

		F. RANDALL KARFONTA, Attorney @ Law, 113 North Main, PO  Box 565, Leland, MI
49654, Phone: (231) 256-2200. Visit http://www.leelanau.com  or
http://www.leelanau.com/professional/karfonta.

		Back to Quicklinks

		RAYMOND A. CASSAR, Law Offices of Raymond A. Cassar, 30665  Northwestern Hwy,
Suite 100, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, Phone: (248)  855-0911, FAX: (248)
855-9523, e-mail: rcassar@aol.com.  Additional offices located in Oakland
County (248) 855-0911, and Wayne  County (313) 278-8811. Visit
www.crimlawattorney.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		TALPOS & ARNOLD PC, 2855 Coolidge Road, Suite 109, Troy, MI  48084-3215,
Phone: (248) 643-4515, FAX: (248) 643-4797, e-mail: jctalpos@aol.com.  Visit
www.Mich-Lawyer.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Environmental  Law

		DEAN & FULKERSON, PC, Richard A. Barr, rbarr@dflaw.com  or James K. O'Brien,
jobrien@dflaw.com,  801 W Big Beaver, Suite 500, Troy, MI 48084-4767, Phone:
(248) 362-1300,  FAX: (248) 362-1358.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Family  Law

		JOHN G. MAKRIS, 802 E Big Beaver Rd, Troy, MI 48083-1404,  Phone: (248)
528-1811, FAX: (248) 524-0973, e-mail: jgmakris@altavista.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Federal  False Claims (Qui Tam) Actions

		HaronDAVID  HARON represents  whistleblowers in civil false claims actions
and works with referring  attorneys nationwide who specialize in employment
law and other  fields. Under the federal False Claims Act, private
individuals  with knowledge of fraud against federal programs can file suit
on  behalf of the United States and receive a substantial share of any
recovery. Representing such claimants, Mr. Haron has recovered millions  of
dollars in Medicare and Medicaid funds that had been fraudulently  obtained
by health-care providers, primarily through abusive billing  practices. To
learn more, visit his qui tam web site at www.QuiTamOnline.com  or contact
him directly by e-mail at dharon@fsh-law.com  or phone (248) 952-0400 at
Frank, Stefani, Haron & Hall  in Troy http://www.fsh-law.com/

		Back to Quicklinks

		Health  Law

		KENNETH R. MARCUS, representing provider organizations and  professionals
since 1984 in Blue Cross/Medicaid/Medicare Audit Defense,  Payment Appeals,
Stark Act Compliance, Managed Care Contracting,  Physician Transactions,
Corporate Law. I work collaboratively with  general counsel. Phone
888.865.9955, fax: 248.865.9956, e-mail:  krmarcus@aol.com. Visit
www.lawyers.com/kenmarcus.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Hospital  & Medical Negligence

		THE  LAW OFFICES OF JOHN S. HONE, P.C., representing victims  of hospital and
medical negligence resulting in serious injury,  permanent cognitive and
physical disability and wrongful death.  Millions won, available for
consultation and referral, cases accepted  statewide. Phone Hone: (248)
888-7585; Toll Free: 888-HMO-1010;  Fax: (248) 473-8895; E-mail to
mmhmolawsuit@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Immigration  and Naturalization

		NAHIL PETER ANTONE, N. Peter Antone, PC, 16445 West Twelve  Mile Road, Suite
100, Southfield, MI 48076, Phone: (248) 559-0707,  FAX: (248) 559-0790,
e-mail: Peter@Antone.com.  Visit http://Antone.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		ROGER R. RATHI, Attorney at Law, 29777 Telegraph Road, Suite  2500,
Southfield, MI 48034, Phone: (248) 539-8421, FAX: (248) 353-2786,  e-mail:
rrathi@yahoo.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		STEVEN N. GARMO, Law Offices of Garmo & Garmo, 28230 Orchard  Lake Road,
Suite 201, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, Phone: (248) 626-0050,  FAX: (248)
626-0051, e-mail: steve@garmo.com.  Visit: www.garmo.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Immigration  Law

		MARSHAL  E. HYMAN & ASSOCIATES. All  aspects of immigration law including
employment-based immigration  for professionals and skilled workers. Labor
certifications. Family-based  immigration. Immigration from Canada. Political
asylum, all waivers  and appeals. Corporate transfers for multinational
employees. Representation  in Immigration courts and Federal courts since
1981. 3250 West Big  Beaver, Suite 529, Troy, MI 48084. (248) 643-0642, Fax:
(248) 643-0798.  E-mail: marshalhyman@msu.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Insurance  Law

		STUART A. SKLAR, Fabian, Sklar & Davis, PC, 31800 Northwestern  Hwy, Suite
205, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, Phone: (248) 855-2110,  FAX: (248) 855-0209.
Additional office located in West Michigan  (616) 451-9900, e-mail:
ssklar-firelaw@tir.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Intellectual  Property Law

		GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C.,  280 North Old
Woodward, Suite 400, Birmingham, MI 48009-5392, Phone:  (248) 647-6000, FAX:
(248) 647-5210, e-mail: info@patlaw.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC, Bloomfield Hills (248) 594-0600;  Grand Rapids
(616) 742-3500; Washington, DC (202) 955-3750; Englewood,  CO (303) 991-1200.
Visit www.intelprop.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Labor  & Employment

		THE LAW  OFFICE of  Gregory T. Gibbs  is an AV rated firm with years of
experience in employment law advice  and litigation. We can answer questions
about: handbooks, sexual  harassment, wrongful discharge, discrimination,
family medical leave,  collective bargaining, wage-hour issues or any other
employment  related matter under state or federal law. We work with you and
your clients under referral fee arrangements. 328 S. Saginaw St.,  Ste. 9001,
Flint, MI 48502. (810) 239-9470, fax (810) 235-2468,  e-mail:
bakerlak@tir.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		DAVID D. KOHL, 39500 Orchard Hill Place, Suite 110, Novi, MI  48375, Phone:
(248) 347-6666, FAX: (248) 348-8707, e-mail: daviddkohl@juno.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Litigation

		FINK, ZAUSMER & KAUFMAN, PC, 31700 Middlebelt Rd #150, Farmington  Hills, MI
48334, Phone: (248) 851-4111, FAX: (248) 851-0100. Additional  offices
located in Detroit (313) 963-3873, and Lansing (517) 374-2735.  Visit
http://www.lawsite.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		STEPHEN K. VALENTINE, JR, Valentine & Associates, 5767 West  Maple Road.
Suite 400, West Bloomfield, MI 48322, Phone: (248) 851-3010,  FAX: (248)
851-1553.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Medical  Malpractice

		WANT A SECOND  OPINION ON A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASE? The  law offices of
Anthony M. Malizia, P.C., is a statewide firm that  handles only medical
malpractice cases. I am Martindale-Hubbell  "AV-rated." I sit as a
plaintiff's medical malpractice  mediator. I have 20 years experience in the
review and development  of these cases, many trials to jury verdict, and many
more settlements.  Over the years, upwards of 20% of my case inventory has
consisted  of meritorious cases initially rejected by others, including
"name  firms." Oftentimes these cases were subjected to incomplete  analysis
because of the firm's lack of in-depth, medico-legal background.  Sometimes
medical sleuthing or a new perspective was required. Send  me your rejected
case for a "de novo" review. We also  welcome the referral of "new" cases.
Anthony M. Malizia,  P.C., 37000 Grand River, Suite 340, Farmington Hills, MI
48335,  1-800-555-5107 or e-mail: amlmalizia@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Real  Estate

		BRAD B. ALDRICH, Law Offices of Brad B. Aldrich, PLLC, 645  Griswold, Suite
3261, Detroit, MI 48226, Phone: (313) 965-9490,  FAX: (313) 965-9478, e-mail
belmontald@aol.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Special  Education Law

		LAW OFFICES  OF MARSHA LYNN TUCK with  20 years experience,
Martindale-Hubbell "AV-rated," representing  students with and without
disabilities in suspension, expulsion,  integration, inclusion, and similar
cases. Marsha Lynn Tuck, 30700  Telegraph Road, Suite 4646, Bingham Farms, MI
48025. (248) 585-9338.

		Back  to Quicklinks

		Tax  Litigation & Disputes

		JOSEPH FALCONE  is  available to assist attorneys with Federal and State
Civil and Criminal  Tax Litigation and Dispute matters. Joseph Falcone, a
former IRS  Detroit District Counsel Trial Attorney, has handled thousands
of  tax matters and has 27 years experience working in the specialized  area
of Tax Litigation and Disputes. If you require assistance with  a major tax
dispute, wish to refer a matter, or just need a few  minutes consultation
over the phone with your specific problem or  question, telephone or e-mail
us jf@lawyer.com.  Visit our website at www.lawyers.com/falconerolfe.
Falcone & Rolfe, P.C., 3000 Town Center, Suite 2370, Southfield,  MI 48075.
(248) 357 6610. Fax (248) 357-6613.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Transportation  Law

		PAUL M. ROSS, P.C., 2840 East Grand River Avenue, Suite  1, East Lansing, MI
48823-4911, Phone: (517) 337-7677, FAX: (517)  332-9361, e-mail:
pross1412@aol.com.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Worker's  Compensation

		JOHN M. H ULRICH, IV, Crawforth Mcmanus Tenbrunsel & Ulrich,  999 Haynes
Street, Suite 245, Birmingham, MI 48009-6702, Toll-free:  (800) 424-4878,
Phone: (248) 540-1270, FAX: (248) 540-3925.

		Back to Quicklinks

		To receive information  on how to place a Fields of Practice listing, contact
Stacy  Sage or see Advertising  Opportunities on our website.

		Back to Quicklinks

		classified  advertising

		Confidential  Records Destruction

		SHRED-IT.  Confidentiality, Privacy and Document Security are vital in
today's  environment. SHRED-IT provides solutions for secure destruction  of
confidential, sensitive and proprietary information, utilizing  a unique,
mobile, ON-SITE document destruction system. Call 1-800-69-SHRED  or
1-800-697-4733. E-mail  Eastern Michigan; e-mail  Out state Michigan or visit
 our website

		Back to Quicklinks

		Elections

		Paid Advertisement
		GREG ULRICH  for STATE BAR COMMISSIONER: WAYNE COUNTY-Vote  June 1st for
three term past State Bar Commissioner and Representative  Assembly
Chairperson, GREG ULRICH, with 27 years of bar leadership,  including the ABA
House of Delegates. Partner with Livonia-based  Cummings, McClorey, Davis &
Acho, PLC.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Expert  Witness-Building

		EXPERT WITNESS  services  for construction issues. Our cases include issues
of faulty construction,  failure to disclose, personal injury and ADA. Mr.
Tyson is a member  of many model code organizations including BOCA, ICBO,
NFPA and  ASTM. Our attorney clients represent plaintiffs and defendants.
Rendering independent and unbiased opinions. Ortonville, MI. Phone  (248)
627-6859.

		Back to Quicklinks

		RESIDENTIAL  CONSTRUCTION--ABR  Construction Company, Inc. offering expertise
in all phases of residential  construction related to workmanship, cost,
time, structural analysis,  civil analysis, and other related problems.
Contact Jack W. Belkin  member BOCA, ASHI, Bldg. Spec. Inc. licensed builder
and real estate  broker. (248) 443-4063, cell (248) 867-5042 and fax (248)
443-4065,  e-mail jwbelkin@mich.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Expert  Witness-Economics Consulting

		ECONOMIC LOSS CALCULATION and litigation support in personal  injury,
wrongful death and wrongful discharge cases. Over 25 years  experience
including Chief Economist for the Michigan Department  of Commerce. John F.
Hanieski, Ph.D., Economics Consulting Services,  LLC, 8583 W. Eaton Hwy.,
Grand Ledge, MI 48837. (517) 627-6968.  E-mail: hanieski.john@acd.net
website: http://userdata.acd.net/hanieski.john

		Back to Quicklinks

		Expert  Witness-Forensic & Environmental Geologist

		FORENSIC  and ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGIST*Certified Professional Geologist;  29
years investigating soil and water issues for government and  private
sectors; deposition and trial experience applicable to cases  involving
insurance claims, construction accidents, environmental  contamination,
wetlands, property transactions, malpractice, murder,  rape, etc. For more
information, contact Robert A. Hayes, (517)  655-8348, or
www.geoforensics.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Expert  Witness-Legal Malpractice

		LEGAL MALPRACTICE-EXPERT  EVALUATION, pre-  and post-litigation analysis,
written opinions, deposition and trial  testimony in plaintiff originated or
defendant defended legal malpractice  cases that involve Real Estate and
Commercial Transactions and Civil  Litigation. 18 years' experience as legal
malpractice expert. Asher  N. Tilchin, Tilchin, Hall & Reynolds P.C., 31731
Northwestern  Hwy., Suite 106, Farmington Hills, MI 48334. (248) 855-0995,
fax  (248) 855-0850. E-mail antilchin@aol.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Lawsuit  Financials

		DO MONEY  PROBLEMS caused  by disability force some of your clients to settle
strong, valuable  cases for pennies on the dollar? A Lawsuit Financial,
L.L.C. contingent  advance allows you time to obtain the maximum dollar
possible for  your client's case. Lawsuit Financial, L.L.C., 29777 Telegraph
Road,  Suite 1310, Southfield, MI 48034. Call (248) 948-1800 or (877)
377-SUIT.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Legal  Research

		OPEN online  offers instant and cost effective access to public records.
Select  from many sources of criminal data, verify social security numbers,
confirm driving records, find addresses, UCC and incorporation filings,  real
property records, bankruptcies, liens and judgments. For information  call
800-935-OPEN (6736), email info@openonline.com,  or visit www.openonline.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Office  Space Available

		SOUTHFIELD  LAW OFFICE FOR RENT-Reception, conference, kitchen, photocopier,
fax, file room; secretary to share. Central location near all major
expressways for quick access for clientele and courts in the tri-county
area. Attractive and professional. Call Sandra Maison at (248) 355-9400.
Ddelong@thompsonmorello.com

		Back to Quicklinks

		Positions  Available

		APPELLATE  PRACTICE-Large Detroit litigation firm seeking associate  to join
appellate group in handling appeals and complex motions  in the trial courts.
The firm has a diverse practice, including  defense of medical malpractice,
product liability and employment  claims, as well as commercial and probate
litigation. Excellent  writing and research skills necessary. One to three
years litigation  or clerking experience preferred. EOE Send resume to P.O.
Box 43158,  Detroit, MI 48243.

		Back to Quicklinks

		DAWDA, MANN, MULCAHY & SADLER a full-service Bloomfield Hills  firm, with 25
attorneys and a national client base, is seeking a real  estate/corporate
transactional attorney. Qualified candidates must  have 3-5 years experience
with strong academic credentials. Send resume  and references to Director of
Administration, 39533 Woodward Avenue,  Suite 200, Bloomfield Hills, MI
48304.

		Back to Quicklinks

		 DAWDA, MANN, MULCAHY & SADLER a full-service Bloomfield Hills  firm, with 25
attorneys and a national client base, is seeking a real  estate/corporate
transactional paralegal. Qualified candidates must  have 3-5 years experience
with strong academic credentials. Send resume  and references to Director of
Administration, 39533 Woodward Avenue,  Suite 200, Bloomfield Hills, MI
48304.

		Back to Quicklinks

		ESTABLISHED  MID-SIZED AV Rated Bloomfield Hills litigation firm
representing  businesses and insurance companies, seeks attorney with 0-3
years  experience. Litigation experience helpful. Please direct resumes to
Linda Pillsworth via e-mail: lpillsworth@kallashenk.com or, Facsimile:  (248)
335-9889, or via regular mail: 43902 Woodward Avenue, Suite  200, Bloomfield
Hills, MI 48302. NO TELEPHONE CALLS PLEASE.

		Back to Quicklinks

		EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-The  Grand Rapids Bar Association is soliciting
applications for the position  of Executive Director. The GRBA is a voluntary
local bar with 1,500  members, a full-time staff of 7, one-half-time position
and 8 part-time  volunteers. The Executive Director is the chief operating
officer.  The GRBA includes a Lawyer Referral Service, which will become the
centerpiece for a new Legal Assistance Center in September 2001. The  GRBA
has a combined operating budget of $850,000. The Executive Director  also
oversees, with a committee and the board, the Grand Rapids Bar  Foundation
with assets of $1 million. The Executive Director is responsible  to a
seventeen member Board in accord with policies and procedures  adopted by the
Board. The successful candidate will be a seasoned  executive with a
demonstrated record of achieving positive results,  including experience in
the area of fund development. The Executive  Director will exhibit a high
level of integrity with superior management,  organizational, budgeting,
personnel, and interpersonal communication  skills. The GRBA offers a
competitive salary and benefits package.  Applicants are encouraged to submit
a letter of interest, current  resume, references, and salary requirements to
Executive Director  Search Committee, c/o Sherrie Parmelee, Smith, Haughey,
Rice &  Roegge, Calder Plaza Bldg., 250 Monroe NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503,
(616) 458-2385, sparmlee@shrr.com  The Grand Rapids Bar Association is an
Equal Opportunity Employer.

		Back to Quicklinks

		IMMEDIATE OPENING--Lague,  Newman & Irish is seeking an associate with 1 - 2
years experience.  Candidates must have strong academic credentials and
excellent writing  abilities. Send cover letter, resume, and transcripts to
Eric Gielow,  Lague, Newman & Irish, P.O. Box 389, Muskegon, MI 49443 (or
ergielow@lnilaw.com).

		Back to Quicklinks

		SENIOR COUNSEL*Responsibilities  of this person are to provide advice to
various departments. Draft,  review and negotiate agreements, debt
instruments, and guaranties  for domestic and international business units.
Review all advertising  for compliance with FTC regulations, trademark usage
and adherence  to corporate policies. Defend employment related legal actions
and  review and advise on hiring practices and procedures. Minimum
qualifications  are seven years experience from a law firm and/or a major
corporation  with relevant practice experience. Plus strong background with
employment  law. J.D. from a accredited law school, admitted to practice law
in  Michigan or other U.S. jurisdiction. Please send resume to
Ashleys@dominos.com  or fax to 734-930-4350. Salary is 110K.Legal Department,
Domino's  Pizza, 30 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.

		Back to Quicklinks

		UNIVERSITY  OF MICHIGAN-The  Office of the Vice President and General Counsel
of the University  of Michigan is seeking exceptionally qualified applicants
for an attorney  who will take primary responsibility for coordinating the
University's  litigation in the medical malpractice area. The successful
candidate  will engage and supervise outside counsel in medical malpractice
and  will provide advice and representation in other areas of health care
law. This position will work closely with the senior leadership of  the
University Health System, including the Chief of Staff for Clinical  Affairs
and the Director of the Medical Center Risk Management Office,  other
attorneys in the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel,  and with
individual members of the medical staff. The successful candidate  will draft
and review policies; serve on University committees; conduct  educational
programs on legal topics for the University community,  and carry out other
duties as assigned. Experience providing legal  services for a university
affiliated, or similar, health care system  is desired. A law degree from an
NALS accredited law school, membership  or eligibility for membership in the
State Bar of Michigan, at least  five years litigation experience with an
emphasis on medical malpractice,  reasonable experience in health care law
are required. Applications  will be accepted until the position is filled,
but applications should  be submitted promptly to ensure full consideration.
To apply, please  send a cover letter and resume to: Office of the Vice
President and  General Counsel, Attention: MED MAL, 4010 Fleming
Administration Building,  Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1340. The University of
Michigan is an equal  opportunity, affirmative action employer.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Services

		SOUTH FLORIDA  ATTORNEY available for consultations, all legal and business
matters, referrals, or local counsel, litigation and estates. Contact  Mark
M. Berkley, 385-C West 49th Street, Hialeah (Miami) Florida  33012, telephone
305.556.2626. Member of the State Bar of Michigan  for 25 years and the
Florida Bar for 14 years.

		Back to Quicklinks

		Typing  Services

		IS YOUR WORK LOAD OVERWHELMED? Do you have employees on  vacation, sick leave
or disability? Do you need legal briefs, motions  or complaints filed today?
I CAN HELP!!! Visit my web page at www.gnrtyping.com  for more information.
Fast and dependable. SPEEDY FINGERS AT YOUR  SERVICE!

		Back to Quicklinks

		To receive information  on how to place a classified advertisement, contact
Stacy  Sage

		news  & moves

		Back to Quicklinks

		  bar events

		Back to Quicklinks

		archived  e-Journals

		Case  Summary Cumulative Index

		Wednesday,  May 23 e-Journal

		Thursday, May  24  e-Journal

		Friday, May  25 e-Journal

		Tuesday, May  29 e-Journal

		Back to Quicklinks

		contacts

		For information  on classified advertising, contact Stacy Sage

		For information  on fields of practice listings, contact Stacy  Sage

		For unsubscribe  and change of address issues, contact: Carrie  Pickett

		To list bar  event information, send your information to Carrie  Pickett

		Editorial  comments may be sent to Nancy  Brown

		Technical  questions may be sent to e-journal-tech@michbar.org

		Who  Does What at the State Bar

		Back to Quicklinks

		To receive the  text-only version, please send an e-mail to
lyris@lists.michbar.org In  the body, type: subscribe ejournal-text. To
unsubscribe from the html  version, type: unsubscribe ejournal on the next
line. You may re-subscribe  or unsubscribe at any time.

State Bar of  Michigan Home
Copyright , 2001, State Bar of Michigan
---
You are currently subscribed to ejournal as: [mark.e.haedicke@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-ejournal-255481W@lists.michbar.org


Nancy,

Thanks for the wonderful turn around time!

I glanced through the interconnect.  It includes arbitration (poor Dutch) and
equipment outage as force majeure.  Gee, what's good for the goose should be
good for the gander.

Talk to you soon,

Kay


Nagesh ,

I would like to have the CPR Position Manager resorted for the Texas/HPLC
screen as Follows:

Houston Pipe Line
East Texas Gas Systems
NNGB
Humble Gas Pipeline
Oasis Pipeline Company
PG&E Valero
PG&E TECO
Remaining pipelines in alphabetical order.

In addition to this, please sort the location level (zones) under Houston
Pipeline as follows:

01-Thompsonville
14-South Texas
02-Robstown
19-King Ranch
11-Corpus
03-A/S South
04-A/S Central
07-A/S East
08-East Texas
15-Katy
16-West Loop
10-Ship Channel
Remaining zones in numerical order

Let me know if you have any questions or problems.  Thanks.

Daren


Today,  we were both OOMC'd and OOME'd  for 135mw's for the entire day.      The OOME instruction was a category 4,  which means operate AT this level.
We sold an additional 85 mw's from the plant,  bringing the total to 220.
Ercot called to tell us to drop the output of the plant to 135.     I hesitated because of the confusion we have previously experienced with this product.

I contacted Mark Patterson and discussed the category 4 requirements and I agreed to take the plant down.
Colleen at Ercot said that she was going to "report me" for not immediately complying.    Am I in trouble?

JMF


The outage is scheduled for 1/4/00 to 1/6/00.  It will not effect 1/1/00
throught 1/3/00.  There is no need for Duke to hold gas back until 1/4/00.

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 10:47 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Charlotte Hawkins                           12/30/99 09:07 AM

To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Koch Three Rivers, #6722

I spoke with Larry Zamit this morning regarding the outage January 1 through
6.  He agreed to hold the gas for us and batch it throughout the rest of
January.  At this point we have 3,007 nominated for 1/1/00 and that is what
he has agreed to hold.

Questions??  Give me a call.

Charlotte/Aimee


Below are the templates we could use for a non-EOL ISDA swap, as well as a
non-EOL deemed ISDA example, and a copy of the most recent deal traded with
Vitol.  Let me know if you need anything else.


SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
June 6, 2001

Why aren't banks doing better?

Interest rate trends couldn't be more favorable, but leading banks such as
J.P. Morgan and Bank One can't get any traction.

By Michael Sivy

If I were asked to name the single most important stock market indicator,
I'd say the tilt of the yield curve. When long-term interest rates are at
least half a percentage point higher than short-term rates, the economy
typically grows at a healthy rate. But when short-term rates are even with
or higher than long-term rates, the economy almost always stagnates or
starts contracting. The yield curve is especially important for banks,
since they have to borrow short-term money that they lend to long-term
borrowers. The difference between short- and long-term rates, therefore, is
a rough gauge of banks' profit margins.

After five cuts in short-term interest rates this year by the Federal
Reserve, the difference between short and long rates is two full percentage
points. With loan margins that fat, you'd think that the top U.S. bank
stocks would be in great shape. But they aren't. Shares of leading banks
such as J.P. Morgan Chase [JPM] and Bank One [ONE] are flat to down so far
this year. And both stocks have announced that their earnings for the
current quarter will be below what analysts were expecting. What's the
explanation for the lousy results?

Essentially, there are two problems. Many of the big banks lent
aggressively during the boom of the past five years and now find themselves
saddled with lots of problem loans. In the case of J.P. Morgan Chase, those
loans are to tech firms, such as telecoms. Bank One's problem loans, by
contrast, represent credit-card debt. But in both cases, the banks will
have to clean up their portfolios before they can truly profit from the
improved interest-rate environment.

Global giants, such as J.P. Morgan Chase, have a second set of problems.
Over the past five years, their earnings became increasingly dependent on
investment banking activity, such as IPO underwriting, private equity
investments and proprietary trading. All of those businesses are depressed
and will likely remain so until the tenor of the market improves
substantially. And even though the Nasdaq is up 35 percent from the April
lows, J.P. Morgan's losses on past investments are still outpacing its
gains on those that are recovering.

Where does that leave the stocks? Basically, they have a lot of sewage to
wade through for the rest of this year. But they should be coming back
strongly by the start of 2002. And, of course, share prices normally
anticipate such improvements by at least a few months.

I recommended J.P. Morgan Chase in January at $53 a share, saying the bank
faced a rough six months, followed by accelerating growth over the coming
three years. That scenario is unfolding more slowly than I expected, and
the share price has declined by six bucks. But for long-term investors, I
continue to believe that this is the must-own bank stock. However long it
takes to clean everything up, the bank will be a powerhouse a couple of
years from now. And after slipping back since January, the share price
seems absurdly cheap. The bank's earnings power is well over $4 a share, a
rate it should reach sometime next year. At the current $47 share price,
that's a price/earnings multiple of less than 12 for a stock with a 12
percent compound growth rate and a 2.8 percent dividend yield.

I'm less enthusiastic about Bank One. Consumer indebtedness has doubled
since 1992. So I can't help but wonder how quickly the bank's problem loans
will be taken care of. It's true that consumers will be getting some tax
relief and that recent mortgage refinancings have boosted disposable
income. But we all know that most of that money is going to be spent
instead of going to reduce household debt. As a result, I think Bank One
will be working through problem loans for a while -- and it's a more
expensive stock than many other bank issues.

=====================
Check out Michael's latest chat transcript discussing the markets, tech
stocks, financials, and more ...
http://www.money.com/money/chat/2001/010605.html
=====================

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

-----------------------------------------------------------
CONTACT THE BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD!
Over 5,000 contact names in the OFFICIAL FORTUNE Databases.
DOWNLOAD THEM NOW!
http://www.fortune.com/sitelets/datastore/index.html?mn01
-----------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


The Transmission Roundtable Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 13, 2001, has been changed to Wednesday, June 27, 2001, in room EB 42C1.  By Wednesday, June 13, 2001, please submit a list of topics you would like to see discussed at this meeting.  Also, please be prepared to introduce the topic at this meeting. Thanks.

Regards,

Anita DuPont
Enron Research Group
713-853-0329
EB 1969


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/07/2000 01:25 PM -----

	Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/06/2000 02:38 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: More

Sorry to bring more to you but perhaps this is something that Rob Walls could
easily look through.  Global has a contract that is ready for signing.
Global is involved as an investor in Razorfinish.com.  The person who is
supposed to sign the contract is procrastinating as long as possible bec ause
the contract is not in the interest of Enron.  I told the person not to sign
it regardless of the pressure from Sanjay.  Hopefully, Rob could get to it.


Sally would like to have another meeting as was done yesterday in her office today - ECS 04102.

Thank you,


You HAVE to open this- it's so funny!? : )

http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1358905&a=10126088&p=33926943


pls put on my calendar.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/14/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Schafer                           07/14/2000 08:04 AM

Sent by: Alma Navarro
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Dan Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, George Rood/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob M
Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@Enron, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert Meyers/ENRON@Gateway, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Costello/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GPG Officers' Meeting

You are invited to join Stan Horton,s staff meeting this Monday, July 17, at
10:00 a.m.  As usual, the meeting will be held via videoconference, so you
can join us in EB49C2 in Houston or in OMA717 in Omaha.  The meeting will
probably last about a half-hour.

See you Monday.

Dave Schafer


Guys--

First of all, Louise, I understand we have a baby??  CONGRATULATIONS!! (details please, at your earliest chance)

Regarding the Wharton e-Business Initiative (see below for one of the many eMails I've received concerning Enron's participation--link to the referenced web site for specific agenda; also, I've received several voice messages from leaders of the effort).  The information below discusses one of the  forums (coming up 5/31-6/1) that comprise an on-going e-business initiative in which Enron has invested with Wharton.

 The participants from Wharton include senior level professors; while there may be some student involvement, the intentional focus is high level discussion and research endeavors at the professorial level.
Other participants in WeBI are Corporate representatives.  The idea is for the professors to offer their latest research issues, promote discussions among the corporate participants to talk through the professors research and other research in the literature, as well as for the professors to listen for new areas for which commercial eBusinesses are seeking new research.

Again,  this is intentionally designed as a High Level Professor participation on the Wharton side, and high level e-Business Corporate executives on the other side. This is intentionally designed to create a high-level 'e-think-tank' environment for senior level professors and corporate executives.

O.K.....have I labored enough to describe what WeBI is all about??

As opposed to the several other efforts Enron University Affairs has to DIRECTLY increase Enron's favorability and familiarity on campus at levels above recruiting, but that ultimately trickle down to recruiting, this is intentionally a research/discussion effort. Clearly, the Enron Brand equity in dealing with professors is that the professors ultimately incorporate work from information from the participatory forums into their class teachings, references, course work, etc.

A few weeks ago, Louise and I breifly chatted about Enron's involvement in this effort.  Clearly, there is a HUGE interest by the Wharton professors and other corporate participants involved to have Enron attend and participate---they quite respectfully call me and eMail me very frequently.......All of this is very interesting to me and I have shepherded our minimal involvement-in-fact........ yet the question remains:  is there someone at Enron, directly involved in Enron's eBusiness initiatives, interested in jumping into this effort and participating?  Do those of you involved in these businesses think it worth your time and expense, or the time and expense of one of your senior (at least Director level) people to participate?  Would it be viewed, at least at this time,  simply as an "Enron brain drain" (I've received this realistic and possibly quite legitimate concern from more than one business person at Enron).

The bottom line is, I'd like to be able to respond intelligently and honestly to those at Wharton committed to this effort.  I feel more than comfortable telling Wharton that, at this time, Enron is satisfied to participate in the WeBI effort largely at the
financial level it has already invested--with the option to participate at other levels in the future, at Enron's discretion.

ALL comments solicited----

Many thanks!!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 04:02 PM ---------------------------

HartleyR <HartleyR@wharton.upenn.edu> on 05/21/2001 03:03:44 PM
To:	"'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	ICG/Wharton Forum meeting May 31-June 1

Christie,

Lee Goldring, our new Forum director mentioned that he placed a call to you
to introduce himself and follow up on Enron's representation at the next
meeting.  I'm emailing this information to you to alert you to the situation
since I do not think you would want Enron to go unrepresented at the next
meeting. To date, no one from Enron has registered for the Forum sponsored
Online Conversion Workshop,  the Forum meeting on 5/31 or the Members Only
meeting on 6/1.  Please note that the "From Browsers to Buyers: Online
Conversion Workshop" on May 30th is purely optional in case some folks from
Enron are interested in attending.  Since the Forum is co-sponsoring the
Workshop -- WeBI affiliated registrants will not be charged the $495
registration fee as an added benefit for their sponsorship.

Here are all the relevent links to the Forum agenda and registration sites
for your convenience:

Forum Agenda:  http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu/meetingNotes/m_n_5_01.asp
Forum Registration site: http://ecom.wharton.upenn.edu/conferencereg/Reg.asp

From Browsers to Buyers: Online Conversion Workshop:
http://aresty-direct.wharton.upenn.edu/execed/conversion/index.html

Please let me know if there's anything I can help you with.

Best regards,

Robin

Robin Hartley
Associate Director
Wharton Electronic Business Initiative

University of Pennsylvania
Vance Hall - Room 415
3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104
tel (215) 898-4158/fax (215) 898-1905
hartleyr@wharton.upenn.edu
http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu