Unless anyone objects- how about my office at 12 noon.  Address in the
signature
below.  I'll be in the conference room (Presido) by the receptionist.  Bring
some food- we have a free soda dispenser so drinks are on me.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: RE: FIA presentation
Author: "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" <SMTP:cvavrek@deloitte.com>
Date:       04/24/2001 7:36 PM

I can meet anytime, anywhere tomorrow ALTHOUGH Zoe will be with me when we
meet.  I hope that won't be a problem.  I am heading off to school soon so
just let me know the final decision and I'll be there.  Mark - I'll send
revised slides tonight after class.
cv

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA  94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Guinney, Mark [mailto:Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:20 PM
To: "Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com"
Cc: "Anil Sama" " ; "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" " ;
"Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com" "
Subject: Re:RE: FIA presentation

Lunch works for me.  I can arrange for one of our conference rooms if you
would
like.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: FIA presentation
Author: "Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com" <SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
Date:       04/24/2001 5:44 PM

Greetings all:
I'l have the financials and any other comments/suggestions done and sent to
all this evening.  I have a conference call at 7 am tomorrow.  Apologies.
But I think it's very important that we get together one last time to
ensure that we're all on the same page, that folks understand clearly what
slides they're responsible for presenting, etc.  What about lunch tomorrow
(we're all in the city), or at 5 PM (before the ball game)?  Lemme know.

Best,
Jeff

"Guinney, Mark"

<Mark_Guinney@watson        To:     "\"Anil Sama\" "
<asama@yahoo.com>, "
wyatt.com>                  \"Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San
Francisco)\" "
<cvavrek@deloitte.com>, "

04/24/2001 09:51 AM         \"Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com\"
"

<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:

Subject:     RE: FIA
presentation

I do not have everything yet.  Still need info from Anil and Jeff with all
the
numbers.  Carolyn, would you mind condensing into 2 slides a summary of the
acquisition events.  Similar to all the slides you have already done but
just
condensed.  I think that would be it.

Wednesday morning works for me.  I'm going to a Giants game in the evening.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    Re: FIA presentation
Author: "Anil Sama" <SMTP:asama@yahoo.com>
Date:       04/24/2001 1:33 PM

Early Wed works for me. Wed night is fine too.
Also, I'll be sending Mark the slide on comps
later today.

-Anil

--- "Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)"
<cvavrek@deloitte.com> wrote:
> I was wondering if Mark has everything he needs to
> finalize a good draft of
> the presentation.  Also, I think we need to speak live
> again before Thursday
> to flush out our comments.  Who is available when?
> Perhaps we can do an
> early morning meeting downtown (Wednesday 7am-ish) or
> that night at Berkeley
> during break and after for those who don't have class?
> -cv
>
>
>
> Carolyn M. Vavrek
> Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
> Deloitte & Touche
> 50 Fremont Street
> San Francisco, CA  94105
>
> phone: 415-783-5137
> fax: 415-783-8760
> e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com
>
> - This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law.  -
> If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
> this message and
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
> strictly prohibited.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081784&Page=MyReq.


It???s Rene???s Birthday!

Please join us for a party on
Saturday,October 6
7:30p.m.
2001Holcombe
Penthouse 5
The home of Dr. Richard Meisch

No gifts, please!

If you wish, we???ll be collecting $$ for the
Houston Food Bank

We???re looking forward
To seeing everyone then!

Houshyar Moarefi

R.S.V.P. via e-mail

Houshyar@the-spires.com


P.P.S. I just got Monica's number from Amber (for about the 30th time) and
here it is: (303) 322-5035. Sorry that took so long. Call her now, though.
She's excited to hear from you.

K


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 03:29
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/05/2001 03:23:49 PM
To: "'gregory.lang@paulhastings.com'" <gregory.lang@paulhastings.com>,
"'rvicens@deltapower.com'" <rvicens@deltapower.com>,
"'iparker@freshfields.com'" <iparker@freshfields.com>
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'stephon.thome@enron.com'"
<stephon.thome@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Final revisions to the Letter Agreement

 <<RED.Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC>>  <<Letter Agmt Enron
Turbines Delta Power.DOC>>

Gentlemen:

We have enclosed what we hope is the final draft of the letter agreement
between ENA and PPL, marked to reflect revisions from the prior draft dated
April 3, 2001.  In the event these revisions are acceptable, we have also
enclosed a clean copy for execution.  We would recommend execution in
duplicate in order that each party may retain an original. Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures: 133641vR12/11
  133641v12

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - RED.Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC
 - Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC


John,

Thanks for that...I shall recommend Totem to all US enquirers in the future.

There are lots of very exciting things in the pipeline... but I can't tell
you what they are just yet.

Best regards,

Patsy Youngstein
For Marc Newson Ltd

+44 0207 287 9388 T
+44 0207 287 9347 F

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Griffith@enron.com [mailto:John.Griffith@enron.com]
Sent: 05 March 2001 17:53
To: Patsy Youngstein
Subject: RE: Coast chair

Thank you very much for your email.  One thing I would like to let you guys
know.  I called the company in California (Leif Petersen).  They gave me
the company that carries Magis here in Houston.  The name of the company is
Cantoni.  They are not what I would call a good furniture design store.
They carry alot of very cheesy (sorry for lack of better words) Italian
furniture.  I called them to inquire about the Coast chair.  They said that
they carry Magis furniture and the time for ordering would be approximately
3 months.  No big deal, however, when I asked about price, they would not
answer that over the phone.  They wanted me to come into the store so that
they could consult me.  I don't think I need to be consulted on design.  I
know what I want and all I was using them for was to order.  They said it
was store policy not to quote prices over the phone because of competition.
Competition is what the whole world is all about.  I will not be buying
anything from them anytime soon.  I called Totemdesign and they are finding
all the information out for me.  Totem is so great.  They have helped me
with many things.  I just bought an Orgone chair that I expect to receive
in about a week.

Sorry for the rambling on, I guess what I was getting at is that if you
have any say so about who carries Marc's designs, I don't think that
Cantoni is worthy.  Just take that for what it is worth.

Thank you for your time and consideration and I look forward to talking to
you in the future.  Please keep me informed about anything exciting going
on with Marc's designs or any new products coming out.  I am very excited.

Sincerely,

John Griffith


The report named: Wellhead Positions <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Wellhead+Positions&category_cd=8&category_name=WELLHEAD&toc_hide=1&sTV1=8&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


i need to pick up my jacket tonight.  will you be there around 7?


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 10:50 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/23/2001 07:04 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions

FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: Andy Pickens (E-mail); Barrett H. Reasoner (E-mail); David J. Noonan
> (E-mail); Jean Frizzell (E-mail); Michael L. Kirby (E-mail); Michael
> Molland; Mike D. Smith (E-mail); Peter Meringolo; Richard B. Sanders Esq.
> (E-mail); Robert C. Williams (E-mail); Susan Bisop (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions
> Importance: High
>
> FYI
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 2:41 PM
> To: 'Richard Rochman (E-mail)'
> Subject: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions
> Importance: High
>
> Rich,
>  As promised, here is my summary outline of what we discussed
> regarding preservation of data:
>
> 1. In Portland, we proposed to handle business email related to the
> topics in your preservation letter by instructing employees not to delete
> any email sent or received for 24 hours.  Email that is personal and does
> not relate to the business topics you have identified can be kept,
> discarded etc. at the employee's pleasure.  Each day there is a backup
> made that will capture the email in those employees mailboxes.  After 24
> hours, each employee is free to manage their email box as they deem
> appropriate to the business needs (e.g. keep, discard).  From our
> conversation, I understand that you agree that this is an acceptable
> procedure.
>
> 2. With respect to the hard drives on individual computers, you would
> like to get an organizational chart for Portland that would enable us to
> discuss 6-12 individual's computers that would be copied using ProQuest
> Drive Image Pro 4.0.  In addition, there may be some other individuals
> that you would like to have us use a software product called Robocopy to
> copy files from their hard drives onto the network.  Until we figure out
> which computers to copy etc. we will not begin this process.  We discussed
> that because of the holiday period, it may not be practical to get this
> started until after the new year.
>
> 3. Outside of Portland, we have proposed making a snapshot backup along
> business function lines reasonably called for by the subject matter of
> your request.  We propose not to backup any other business units or
> functions.  On a going forward basis, those business functions that
> related to the subject matter of your request would be instructed not to
> delete business email.
>
> 4. We believe that relevant database  backups have been and will
> continue to be made and preserved.
>
> 5. When an employee runs out of hard disk space on their computer, it
> is an acceptable practice to copy files form their hard disk to the
> network (where they will be backed up) and then delete those copied files
> to make sufficient work space for the employee to work.
>
> 6. For EES, I explained that their IT services are outsourced so we do
> not have as detailed information immediately available.
>
> As I mentioned on the phone, all of these discussions and efforts being
> made are done without waiving any objections that any of the Enron
> entities may have to your request including scope, burden, jurisdiction,
> relevance, privilege, privacy, vagueness etc. and Enron specifically
> reserves each and every right and objection it or its employees may have.
>
> Please let me know if your general understanding of our conversation is
> different than the above.
>
> Thanks
> Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Kim Monk (ext. 58268), Kristin Cantu


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Debra,  Can you prepare a spot master Enfolio contract for the attached
party.  Let me know if you have any questions.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Mark Whitt@ENRON
	Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
	04/17/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Citation Oil & Gas Spot Enfolio

Please send Alan Koelemay at Citation Oil and Gas a spot enfolio agreement.

akoelemay@cogc.com

Ph 281-517-7366
Fax 281-469-9641

Thanks


The attached documents contains the representations specific to Lost Creek
and Fort Union that ENA would be making in the 20/20 Purchase and Sale
Agreement as it is drafted currently.  We are making the reps. "to our
knowledge".  Please review the attached document and let me know as soon as
possible if you see any issues that we need to schedule or disclose to
Border.  If you have any questions concerning the scope or definition of the
reps., please call me at (713) 853-3512.  Thanks for your help.


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000008544&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000008544
Request Create Date : 11/29/00 9:30:01 AM
Requested For       : wes.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Please send a reminder out to Mike Barnas, Kent Shoemaker, Steve Swift, Rose
Engeldorf,
Ben Jacoby, Scott Dieball, and Sheila, and once again include the
instructions (yeah, I know).

thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000 05:44
PM ---------------------------
From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 11/28/2000 05:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: World Hunger assignment

Thanks Kay.  I will be on the call tomorrow.  You might get Suzanne to send
out a reminder.


I'd like to send the following from Greg Whalley to North American employees.  It is a quick update on the timing of the North American wholesale gas and power business auction.  Given the number of media reports out there, groups of employees, particularly those in the Wholesale business, are asking for some info.  Before everybody begins to leave for the holidays, we'd like for them to know what's going on with this process.

Hopefully, by sending this out from Greg, we can avoid the longer process of receiving and responding to input from the broader group of legal advisors.  I have included everybody, though, and if anybody takes exception to my view, please send me your comments.  Otherwise, I'll ask Brian Rosen to approve the following for accuracy.  Once I receive his approval, I'll plan to send this out:

There have been several media reports regarding the status of our efforts to preserve the value of our North American natural gas and power business.  As we've said, we'd like to form a joint venture with an entity with a strong credit rating so that our trading business can continue to deliver value to our company and our creditors.  We'd like to update you on the timing of the process as we currently see it.

This Wednesday, December 19th, we will ask the Bankruptcy Court to approve bid procedures for potential suitors to follow as they proceed to make offers for a joint venture.  If we are successful, we will ask the judge to set a bid deadline of January 7th, 2002.  Additionally, we will continue to try to close a deal prior to January 7th, which would be subject to competitive bids from other counterparties.   The number of counterparties interested in a deal continues to grow.  We plan to ask the court to approve the highest and best offer on January 11th, 2002.

Between now and the bid deadline, we will continue to work with all interested parties and assist them in their respective due diligence processes so that they can make the most informed bids.  Many of our colleagues will be working very hard over the holidays to move this process along and help ensure that our efforts to come out of bankruptcy are successful.  Please give them your full cooperation and support.


Some additional thoughts on the force majeure issue--i.e., are we cutting off
shippers' supply due to force majeure?

1.    If the gas at the point is out of spec on water, the answer is clearly
no.  We're shutting in that supply due to our termination of a waiver of the
tariff quality spec., not due to force majeure.  We have the discretion to
grant or terminate waivers of the tariff in our discretion as prudent
operators and so long as we don't discriminate.   If that gas is out of spec
on any of the specific items listed in the "Quality" section of the tariff
(Sec. 44?  47?  I can't remember which but its one of those) then the answer
is the same.

2.  If the gas is being shut in because of heavier hydrocarbons, I think the
answer is the same as above if there is risk of those heavier hydrocarbons
falling out as liquids.  I'm remembering the catch all section of the Quality
paragraph as prohibiting "dirt, gums, and other impurities that would
interfere with the operation of compressors, blah blah" or something to that
effect.  That catch all seems to me to include liquids.  IF the c6 and
heavier is going to form hydrates and fall out as liquids, then the people
delivering those heavies to us are delivering out of spec gas--therefore no
force majeure.   I read Eric's very scientific email and I think the punch
line was that the heavy hydrocarbons may fall out as liquids--right?   The
thing I can't remember is whether the Quality section has specific max.
limits on the individual heavier hydrocarbons.  If so, and if the shippers
are within those limits, my theory based on the catch all language doesn't
work as good.

3.  If we think we need to claim force majeure, we have a problem, because we
could have bought our way out of this situation for a nickel.  Generally, an
event isn't force majeure if it is purely economic.

I'll think about this some more tomorrow and give you guys a call.  DF


How about Raymont, Bill Schroeder and Wayne Chrebet for Freeman?


>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Pal, Vivek
> Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 12:10 PM
> Subject:	Goldman, Sachs & Co. -  Energy Monthly 5/8/01
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Goldman, Sachs & Co. Investment Research - Documents
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>
> Below you will find attached PDF file(s). You will need Acrobat Reader to
> view these documents. If you have the proper software, you can either
> double-click on the attachment, or execute the "Save As" function and save
> the file as a .pdf to be viewed by the Acrobat Reader. If you have
> difficulties with this, please contact 800-446-5362 or 212-902-0606 or you
> can send email to help@gs.com.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> **************************************************************************
> *
> Copyright 2001 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.  All rights reserved.
>
> This report is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the
> solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction
> where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal.
> We are not soliciting any action based upon this material.
> This material is for the general information of clients of
> Goldman Sachs.  It does not take into account the particular
> investment objectives, financial situation or needs of
> individual clients.  Before acting on any advice or
> recommendation in this material, a client should
> consider whether it is suitable for their particular
> circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.
> Certain transactions, including those involving futures,
> options, and high yield securities, give rise to substantial
> risk and are not suitable for all investors.  The material is
> based upon information that we consider reliable, but we
> do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it
> should not be relied upon as such.  Opinions expressed
> are our current opinions as of the date appearing on this
> material only.  While we endeavor to update on a
> reasonable basis the information discussed in this
> material, there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons
> that prevent us from doing so.  We and our affiliates, officers,
> directors, and employees, including persons involved in
> the preparation or issuance of this material may, from time to
> time, have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the
> securities, or derivatives (including options) thereof, of
> companies mentioned herein.   No part of this material
> may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any
> form by any means or (ii) redistributed without Goldman,
> Sachs & Co.'s prior written consent.
>
> This material has been issued by Goldman, Sachs & Co. and/or
> one of its affiliates and has been approved by Goldman Sachs
> International, which is regulated by The Securities and
> Futures Authority, in connection with its distribution in the United
> Kingdom and by Goldman Sachs Canada in connection with
> its distribution in Canada.   This material is distributed in
> Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., in Korea by
> Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch, in Japan by
> Goldman Sachs (Japan) Ltd., in Australia by Goldman Sachs
> Australia Pty Limited (ACN 092 589 770), and in
> Singapore through Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte.
> This material is not for distribution in the United Kingdom to
> private customers, as that term is defined under the rules of
> The Securities and Futures Authority; and any investments,
> including any convertible bonds or derivatives, mentioned
> in this material will not be made available by us to any such
> private customer.  Goldman Sachs International and its
> non-U.S. affiliates may, to the extent permitted under
> applicable law, have acted upon or used this research,
> to the extent it relates to non-U.S. issuers, prior to or
> immediately following its publication.  Foreign-currency-
> denominated securities are subject to fluctuations in
> exchange rates that could have an adverse effect on the
> value or price of, or income derived from, the investment.
> In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, the
> values of which are influenced by foreign currencies,
> effectively assume currency risk.
>
> Further information on any of the securities mentioned in this
> material may be obtained upon request, and for this purpose
> persons in Italy should contact Goldman Sachs S.I.M. S.p.A. in
> Milan, or at its London branch office at 133 Fleet Street, and
> persons in Hong Kong should contact Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.
> at 2 Queen's Road Central, and persons in Australia should
> contact Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Limited.  Unless governing
> law permits otherwise, you must contact a Goldman Sachs
> entity in your home jurisdiction if you want to use our services
> in effecting a transaction in the securities mentioned in this material.
>
> **************************************************************************
> *
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This Message was sent from:
> User           : arteme
> Remote Host    : 154.4.115.251
> Web Browser    : Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT;
> CPT-IE401SP1)
> Date           : Tue May  8  8:35:48 US/Eastern 2001
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -  <<Research1.PDF>>

 - Research1.PDF


Debra,

Same list as previous email.  This one has TPs on "East no Duplicates" tab that are not on your master list highlited in yellow.  I don't know of any other transmission lists.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Debra
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:23 PM
To:	Rorschach, Reagan
Subject:	RE: Minutes and actions from todays UBS start up meeting

Reagan,

Thank you for the heads up.  So far the agreements I have discussed with the TP's sound like blanket agreements for firm and non-firm transmission.  Once I get my hands on the paperwork, I would like to review each TP with the group to make sure we are covered for all services we will require.
Debra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rorschach, Reagan
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:55 PM
To:	Bailey, Debra
Subject:	RE: Minutes and actions from todays UBS start up meeting

Debra,

As I continue to look through these lists, it is apparent that there are potentially more than one agreement with the TPs.  For example:
point to point
firm
non-firm
short term firm
non-firm
etc....

I am not up to speed on all the different blanket trans agreements we might need or are available.  It seems they all are a bit differently named but fall into similiar transmission classes??  I noticed the Agreement Required column, and it does indicate multiple agreements.  Just want to make sure we don't miss one with a TP.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Debra
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:29 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Will, Lloyd; Baughman Jr., Don; Bentley, Corry; Donovan, Terry W.; Abler, Bill; Rorschach, Reagan; Day, Smith L.; Choate, Jason; Hanse, Patrick; Furrow, Dale; Valderrama, Larry
Subject:	Minutes and actions from todays UBS start up meeting

Thank you for attending today's meeting.  I believe it went well.  Enclosed are the minutes and actions.  I will schedule a second meeting on Thursday to review where we are.

All meeting agenda's, minutes/actions and the latest transmission provider list will be stored in the following directory on the M drive.  Please let me know if you need access to the M drive.

Debra

M:\Eprojects\UBS_Start_Up

 << File: Actions_1_29_mtg.doc >>


June 25, 2000

     Teco Tap       50.000 / Enron ; 59.917 / HPL IFERC

Should have been:

     Teco Tap       50.000 / Enron ; 60.417 / HPL IFERC


This seems fine to me.  I have no other questions or comments.  There is a
small issue outstanding re. the Enron Re outside counsel opinion, which I
think LeBoeuf is handling with Bermuda counsel.

Regards

Steve

Mark.Taylor@enron.com on 05/31/2000 10:57:24 AM

To:   Stephen_Kruft@swissre.com
cc:   Lou.Stoler@enron.com
Subject:  Re: BWT Transaction

Thanks for your note.  In reply:

1.  We will change United Kingdom to England in the governing law section.

2.  and 3.  We did switch to the English law form and our form didn't
provide for using securities as collateral.  As you point out, it is likely
that SR will always be in the money and the CSA provides for an unlimited
Threshold for SR at all times so that it will never be providing collateral
under that document.   There are certainly other changes that could be made
to the document with that in mind but in the interest of time we didn't
make much of an effort on that score - our theory was that you wouldn't
mind too much since you would never have to post anything under this
document.

Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments.

Mark

                    "Stephen Kruft"
                    <Stephen_Kruft@sw        To:     mark.taylor@enron.com
                    issre.com>               cc:
                                             Subject:     BWT Transaction
                    05/31/2000 08:56
                    AM

I looked at the EFR-ENA Schedule in connection with Gordon Boozer's
comments.  I see no problems except:

1.  The document is expressed to be governed by the law of the"United
Kingdom."   I have never seen this formulation and think it should say
"England," as I believe there are in fact multiple legal systems (e.g.,
Scottish) within the U.K.

2.  I am not sure why all collateral except LCs was deleted.  Was this
agreed by EFR?  If so, OK.  If not, could the CSA provide for other
collateral as Gordon requested.  It is unusual for SR entities to use LCs
in non-reinsurance situations and would probably cost them less to post
Treasuries.  Here it is of course unlikely that EFR will have to post
anything, since EFR will always be in the money to some extent.

3. Did you switch to the English law form of CSA?

Regards

Received: from iss05.interliant.com ([198.64.193.195]) by
Internet-507.interliant.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2  (600.1 3-26-1998)) with
SMTP id 862568F0.0052309B; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:43 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
     by iss05.interliant.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA13077
     for
[IN]Stephen_Kruft/SwissRe%RCOMINT%RCOMNET%interliant%inbound@smtpgw.interli
ant.com; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9])
     by iss05.interliant.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12989
     for <Stephen_Kruft@swissre.com>; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:24 -0500 (CDT)

Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66])
     by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id
JAA10211
     for <Stephen_Kruft@swissre.com>; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:24 -0500 (CDT)

Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (ene-mta01.enron.com [192.168.63.180])
     by mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id
e4VEv8C17711
     for <Stephen_Kruft@swissre.com>; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:08 -0500 (CDT)

Subject: Re: BWT Transaction
To: Stephen_Kruft@swissre.com
Cc: Lou.Stoler@enron.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OF373F4280.66855213-ON862568F0.00516316@enron.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 09:57:24 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at
 05/31/2000 09:59:18 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


The 2000ces01.xls is the file I created.  The other file was created by Jeff
Hodge


I just heard from Tom Riggs who indicated that Goldman was still in the process of calculating the Settlement Amount which, together with the affected trades, will be sent to us in the next few weeks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


There are several unit contingent deals that don't have the unit name in the
comment section.  Can you have them put in this information.  I know you sent
us a reference sheet, but I think it would be better if the trader would
specify the unit in the comment section.
568866
568864
568863
568857
568860
568865

Also, there was a deal on the no report this morning that looked to us like
it probably should be confirmed.  Can you take a look at it and let me know?
#567992

Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: Llodra, John
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Davis, Mark Dana; Presto, Kevin M.; Gupta, Gautam
Cc: Tricoli, Carl
Subject: Tractebel deal with NIMO shot down by PSC

Not sure if you guys were aware of this.  I heard that Tractebel was unwinding a lot of their positions over the last couple weeks, and that the PSC shot the deal down (yesterday i think).

John


FYI as we sort through this structure.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 04:58 PM -----

	Patrick Conner
	08/10/2000 01:06 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: MG plc's Integration with Enron NetWorks L.P.

This should give you the information that you were looking for.

PC
---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000
12:52 PM ---------------------------
To: Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG plc's Integration with Enron NetWorks L.P.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ibrahim Qureishi/Corp/Enron on 08/10/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephen H Douglas @ ECT                           08/10/2000 12:56 PM

To: Bill W Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jodi Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth
Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Ibrahim
Qureishi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG plc's Integration with Enron NetWorks L.P.

The following power point presentation graphically sets forth the steps
necessary to integrate MG plc into Enron NetWorks L.P.  This presentation
differs from that sent to several of you last week in that there are now
dotted lines in red around those pieces of MG that are affected at each stage
of the reorganization and solid red lines around the same pieces reflecting
where they wind up at each such stage - hopefully a more friendly on the eyes
presentation.  Please do not hesitate to call regarding any piece of the
presentation.  My best to all.  Steve.


Thx

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                    "Portz,
                    David"               To:     <lech.kalembka@cwt.com>
                    <David.Portz@        cc:     "Heard, Marie"
                    ENRON.com>           <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>, "Cook,
                    Office:              Mary" <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>
                                         Subject:     RE: AEP Master
                    11/05/2001           Netting Agr
                    05:27 PM

Jurisdictions of incorporation:

          American Electric Power Service Corporation:  New York

          AEP Energy Services, Inc:  Ohio

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Cook, Mary
> Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 4:16 PM
> To:     'lech.kalembka@cwt.com'; Heard, Marie
> Cc:     Portz, David; Sager, Elizabeth
> Subject:     RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>
> Do not do the searches, but do the filings for our benefit.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:     "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:     Monday, November 05, 2001 4:08 PM
>    To:  Heard, Marie
>    Cc:  Portz, David; Sager, Elizabeth; Cook, Mary
>    Subject:  RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>
>
>    Should we file?  Thanks.
>
>    Lech Kalembka
>    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    100 Maiden Lane
>    New York, NY  10038
>    Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>
>
>
>                        "Heard,
>                        Marie"               To:
> <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>
>                        <Marie.Heard@        cc:     "Sager,
> Elizabeth"
>                        ENRON.com>
> <Elizabeth.Sager@ENRON.com>,
>                        Office:              "Portz, David"
>
> <David.Portz@ENRON.com>, "Cook,
>                        11/05/2001           Mary"
> <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>
>                        05:04 PM             Subject:     RE: AEP
> Master
>                                             Netting Agr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    Lech:
>
>    I just spoke with Elizabeth Sager and she said there was no need
> to
>    order lien searches for AEP as the contract expires in March,
> 2002.
>
>    Marie
>
>    Marie Heard
>    Senior Legal Specialist
>    Enron North America Corp.
>    Phone:  (713) 853-3907
>    Fax:  (713) 646-3490
>    marie.heard@enron.com
>
>    >  -----Original Message-----
>    > From:   "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    > Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 3:28 PM
>    > To:     Portz, David
>    > Cc:     Heard, Marie
>    > Subject:     RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>    >
>    >
>    > I did receive the document.  Should I contact anyone, or am I
> awaiting
>    > a
>    > call to discuss/negotiate?  Thanks.
>    >
>    > Lech Kalembka
>    > Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    > 100 Maiden Lane
>    > New York, NY  10038
>    > Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    > Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    > E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >                     David.Portz@e
>    >                     nron.com             To:
> Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com
>    >                     Office:              cc:
> Marie.Heard@enron.com
>    >                                          Subject:     RE: AEP
> Master
>    >                     11/05/2001           Netting Agr
>    >                     04:17 PM
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > Lech -- Please let me know if you did not receive the
> attachment via
>    > my
>    > subsequent e-mail.  I understand the UCC searches and filings
> to be
>    > needed
>    > in relation to the attachment's Section 6(b).  Upon completion
> of
>    > negotiations, I will send you an electronic copy of the
> finalized
>    > Netting
>    > and Setoff Agreement to faciliate Cadwalader's preparation of
> the
>    > financing
>    > statement filings.  --David Portz
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:54 PM
>    >    To:     Portz, David
>    >    Subject:  Re: AEP Master Netting Agr
>    >
>    >
>    >    I did not find an attachment.  Also, I assume that we will
> prepare
>    > UCC
>    >    filings and order UCC searches.  Thank you.
>    >
>    >    Lech Kalembka
>    >    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    >    100 Maiden Lane
>    >    New York, NY  10038
>    >    Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    >    Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    >    E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >                        "Portz,
>    >                        David"               To:
>    > <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>
>    >                        <David.Portz@        cc:     "Sager,
> Elizabeth"
>    >                        ENRON.com>
>    > <Elizabeth.Sager@ENRON.com>,
>    >                        Office:              "Heard, Marie"
>    >
> <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>,
>    > "Cook,
>    >                        11/05/2001           Mary"
>    > <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>,
>    >                        03:32 PM             "Williams, Jason R
>    > (Credit)"
>    >
>    > <Jason.R.Williams@ENRON.com>
>    >                                             Subject:     AEP
> Master
>    > Netting
>    >                                             Agr
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >    Lech - A high priority Master Netting and Setoff Agreement
> (see
>    >    attached) is in the late stages of negotiation with the
>    > below-referenced
>    >    AEP affiliates.  The agreement is currently intended to be
> limited
>    > to
>    >    masters/ transactions between ENA &/or EPMI and two major
> AEP
>    > trading
>    >    affiliates, American Electric Power Service Corporation as
> Agent
>    > for the
>    >    AEP Operating Companies ("AEP") and AEP Energy Services,
> Inc.
>    >    ("AEPESI").  The Netting Agreement explicitly identifies
> enabling
>    >    agreements between those entities relating to trading
> physical gas,
>    >    physical power, and financial swaps.  Earlier today the
> Enron
>    > Credit
>    >    group indicated that ENA trades (using GTCs) physical coal
> and
>    > physical
>    >    synfuel with American Electric Power Service Corporation.
> Please
>    >    contact me with any questions. -- David
>    >
>    >    David A. Portz
>    >    Senior Counsel
>    >    Enron North America Corp.
>    >    1400 Smith, EB 3805a
>    >    Houston, Texas  77002-7361
>    >
>    >    Phone:   713-853-9239
>    >    Fax:  713-646-3491
>    >    Assistant:   Linda Simmons (Ext. 57851)
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
> relevant
>    > affiliate
>    >    and may contain confidential and privileged material for
> the sole
>    > use of
>    >    the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
> or
>    > disclosure
>    >    by
>    >    others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    > recipient (or
>    >    authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
> the sender
>    > or
>    >    reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
>    > and
>    >    delete
>    >    all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto)
>    > are
>    >    not
>    >    intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or
>    > evidence
>    >    a
>    >    binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
> any of its
>    >    affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
> and may
>    > not
>    >    be
>    >    relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or
>    > otherwise.
>    >    Thank you.
>    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>    >    NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and
> may be
>    > legally
>    >    privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
> must not
>    > read,
>    >    use or disseminate the information.  Although this email
> and any
>    >    attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect
>    >    that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and
>    >    opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it
>    > is
>    >    virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
>    > Wickersham
>    >    & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its
> use.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    > NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may
> be
>    > legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must
>    > not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this
> email and
>    > any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect
>    > that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and
>    > opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it is
>    > virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
> Wickersham
>    > & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>
>
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> ========
>    NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be
> legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must
> not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
>    that might affect any computer system into which it is received
> and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
> it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
> Wickersham
>    & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> ========
>

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


AGA for 7/7/00 is 97


Would you get me all the contract details on this capacity and email it to me?

thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:13
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/21/2000 01:27 PM

To: Angel Fuller/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry
Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Angel,

Steve Gillespie is managing the day to day operations of the VNG asset mgt.
deal for our logistics group.  Please include him with your queries.  It is
my understanding that we are agents for all of their contracts and we pay all
their transport costs.  In turn, we invoice them and they re-imburse us for
that transport.

Chris Germany and Scott Goodell in the Transportation Trading Group  are
responsible for setting these contracts in UNIFY.  All of these contracts in
question are storage or transportation tied to storage. Chris/Scott please
set up the 5 valid contracts below in UNIFY as soon as possible....Contract
37634 is terminated effective 8/31/1999.

If you have any questions please let us know.
Victor

Angel Fuller@ENRON
11/21/2000 09:47 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Hi Joann and Alvin,

As you know, effective October 1, ENA became agent for Virginia Natural Gas.
Here in Volume Management, as I try to load beginning balances and actualize
volumes (so that I can pay VNG's transportation charges) for 10/2000, it
appears that the following contracts for VNG/Cgas are not in Unify.

Contract Number  Type
38079    FSS...Master Contract
35889    x-133 LNG Storage
60536    SST
37634    ISS
53004    FSS
60537    FSS

I would appreciate any help you can give me in getting these contracts in
Unify as soon as possible.  If you have any questions or need additional
information, please let me know.

Thanks,
Angel


Flowers and lunch sounds good.  SS

Shari Stack
04/10/2000 06:33 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Secretary's Day is coming up!

It is on Thursday April 27th this year. I wanted to go ahead and start
organizing what we should do for Kaye since she has supported us all
outstandingly well this past year (surprise, surprise...) .  I have
personally already gotten her a small present but would be happy to go in on
flowers and/or lunch for her.

Please email me back by the end of the week if you want to participate in:

1. Lunch

2. Flowers

3. Lunch & Flowers

Also - I am open to suggestions on the lunch place. Anybody have a
suggestion??   Some that I would propose are:  Mark's, Ruggles, Crostini,
Boulevard Bistrot.


Well, it looks like we are actually announcing the Blockbuster deal next
Wednesday!  Blockbuster has agreed to most of the language but the stuff in
bold (or nonbold in the case of the headline) has not been agreed to.  Please
take a look, but do not circulate until Monday with others--we are missing a
few pieces and there could be more changes.  Wanted you to see how it is
shaping up.

Ken Lay helped get a number of issues resolved this week by accompanying
Blockbuster to various partner and studio meetings and we really appreciate
it.  He is therefore coming for the webcast taping on Tuesday and the dinner
we are hosting for our partners even if Blockbuster and Enron are the only
two to participate.

Will keep you posted.  Mark, thanks for the reminder on managing expectations
about how this goes over.  When I reminded Hirko and Rice that we make this
announcement as great as possible, but the market decides if they like it and
cover it, they promised not to fire me next week because of the Blockbuster
deal.


Just fyi - Andy Z. has asked that I be the administrator (i.e Master User)
for IntercontinentalExchange for all of ENA, ECC, and EPMI trading.  The cost
of this exchange is $500 per user so we are going to be closely monitoring
who is getting access to the site.  We are working  to get something set up
on eRequest to track and automate this process.  We have a meeting scheduled
for Wed, so I will give you all the details then.

Thanks
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 09:10
PM ---------------------------

Chuck Vice <chuck.vice@intcx.com> on 10/16/2000 06:51:54 PM
To: "'sheri.thomas@enron.com'" <sheri.thomas@enron.com>
cc: **Sales <sales@intcx.com>
Subject: ICE New User Enrollment

Sheri,

It was a pleasure speaking with you today.  Attached is the ICE New User
Enrollment Form.  This is the means by which you can identify the
individuals that are to be set up as ICE users and the level of access (User
Type) to be granted to each.  Of particular importance is the identification
of the individuals who will be acting as the primary Administrative, Credit,
IT, and Invoicing contacts for IntercontinentalExchange.

You will need to complete a separate form for each Enron entity that
executed a Participant Agreement.

If you have any questions, please call me at 770.738.2129.  Thanks for your
interest and we look forward to serving you.

Regards,
Chuck Vice
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 400
Atlanta, GA  30328
Tel:    770.738.2129
Fax:   770.951.5481
Cell:   678.414.5608
chuck.vice@intcx.com
---------------------------------------------------
 <<ICE New User Enrollment Form.xls>>

 - ICE New User Enrollment Form.xls


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041903.txt


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/17/2000 02:30 PM ---------------------------

	enron india

	From:  Mrudula Gadade                           02/17/2000 04:13 AM

To: Kenneth Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Belew/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rudy
Benitez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John W
Cates/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lohit
Datta-Barua/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Binky
Davidson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tushar
Dhruv/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranabir
Dutt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tony
Galt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Zdenek
Gerych/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roy
Gibson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren
Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David B
Howe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karima
Husain/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Iyer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Annat
Jain/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debra S
Johnson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly
Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Meiko
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis
Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Miller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Prashant
Mitta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ruth A
Noble/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hans
Owens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Banu
Ozcan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Douglas S
Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Phil
Patman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debbie
Perrotta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frances
Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Crystal
Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joana
Ryan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol
Short/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddie H
Sikes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Inderpal
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen
Stenhouse/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Johan
Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arvind Bhatnagar@ECT, Clay
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth
Lambert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandy
Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracy
Solis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Crystal
Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EIPL Employees All (Mumbai),
Martha Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EIPL Employees All
(Delhi), METGAS Executives, METGAS Staff, Parinita
Hate/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Message from Sanjay Bhatnagar and Wade Cline.

Please see attached.

Regards,
Mrudula.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
07:28 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           03/14/2001 01:21 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Vince,

maybe we could use this to screen prospective new research group members!

- Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
01:14 PM ---------------------------
Kaye Davenport @ EES   03/14/2001 01:05 PM

To: Bruce N Stram/HOU/EES@EES, <mjacobson@fce.com>, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Just checking you all out!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kaye Davenport/HOU/EES on 03/14/2001
01:04 PM ---------------------------

"Blair Hodges" <blair_hodges@hotmail.com> on 03/14/2001 12:29:51 PM
To: brhodes@downstreamenergy.com, mscandyd2001@msn.com,
Donna.Laird@Wilcom.com, GPhillips@dacg.com, mipopi@hotmail.com,
kdavenpo@enron.com, kwilliam@alogic.com, merry@tjtaxlaw.com,
wondershea@prodigy.net, mknbrd_2000@yahoo.com, theresa.viguerie@inteq.com,
hayatu@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you are
qualified to be a "professional". Scroll down for each answer. The questions
are not that difficult.

1.  How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close
the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an
overly complicated way.

2.  How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?

Wrong answer: Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the
refrigerator.

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe,
put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to
think through the repercussions of your actions.

3.  The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals
attend except one. Which animal does not attend?

The correct answer is: The Elephant. The Elephant is in the refrigerator.
This tests your memory. Okay, even if you did not answer the first three
questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your abilities.

4.  There is a river you must cross, but it is inhabited by crocodiles. How
do you manage it?

The correct answer is: You swim across.  All the Crocodiles are attending
the Animal Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.
According to Andersen Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the professionals
they tested got all 4 questions wrong. But many preschoolers got several
correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the
theory that most professionals have the brains of a four year old.

Send this out to frustrate all of your friends

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Start Date: 1/31/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013107.txt


let's set up a video call and check this out.  what are your thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

Thor Lien
11/28/2000 02:20 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Weather: meeting with HEX

I think we will see many exchanges with weather contracts in Europe next
year. I've heard about 6 different ones so far.  One of the problems we will
run into is that they all look into different way of setting up contracts.
That can create a situation where we don't get anyone to concentrate about
any "standard" solution.  By cooperating with them can we probably control
the development, but we can also try to keep them in the "dark" so we get
people to use EOL more.  I would tend to lean to the last option right now,
and see how it goes

Thor

To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Weather: meeting with HEX

Thanks for the update.  I think it shows how starved for new products these
exchanges are.  I'm not a fan of teaming up with these kinds of entities.
It's unclear what they bring, and how does this help us?  what do you think?

Jeff

Thor Lien
11/24/2000 01:16 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather: meeting with HEX

Jeff

We have had some meetings with the Helsinki Stock Exchange, and they are very
eager to link to us on Weather.
What's your general opinion about linking EOL to other Exchanges when it
comes to Weather contracts?

Thor
---------------------- Forwarded by Thor Lien/OSL/ECT on 24/11/2000 08:11
---------------------------

Sami Tenngren
16/11/2000 15:31
To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Bjarne Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Preben Richter/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Weather: meeting with HEX

Meeting with the Helsinki Stock Exchange (HEX) went well and the future
opportunities for both parties were discussed. They were very eager to list
HDD swaps (and options at the Exchange) and this should be done by this
coming spring.

Below some bullet points from the meeting:

"deadline is spring
Enron as one of the market makers
They would need our help in formulating the product descriptions for the
local authorities in Finland
They are looking at listing a few points in Finland to start with and then
maybe adding other Nordic / European points
They will provide clearing services for the products
They will also market the products and give training to institutions as well
as private investors/hedgers

Next steps:

They will contact other players regarding the weather derivatives. However,
it seems that they see us as "the one" in this market and therefore would
like us to help them out in the beginning.

They will get back to us during this month to give us an update and outline
the future process in more detail.

How do you feel about this? Are we interested in becoming a market maker?
I feel that it would a great opportunity for us i.e. increased liquidity and
they would do most of the marketing and training. They are also in a co-op
with Eurex, which could open more doors for us in the continental market.

--------------
They have also to some extent investigated the possibility to list Real
Estate derivatives at the Exchange. The way to do this would be to construct
an index based on the closed deals in the real estate market. There could be
separate indeces for the different part of the country or just one common
one. Is this something we could do as well?? It would be a good instrument
for institutions with large real estate portfolios as well as private
investors (those saving for a house or the ones owning real estate).


Everyone,

In an effort to protect our computing systems from viruses and other potential threats, we have disabled the ability to get to external e-mail sites (AOL, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc.) while you are using an Enron computer connected to our network.

If you are using a particular external e-mail site for valid business reasons and this action we have taken has impacted your business, you can contact your Resolution Center for assistance.  Each case will be analyzed for validity and exceptions granted based on business related needs.

Thank you for your understanding that protecting our revenue generating systems is our highest priority.

Enron Global Technology


For comment, etc.

Thanks,

Kay


The "judges" are happy to announce that Colin Tonks is the winner of the $250
EnTelligence Tag Line Contest.  Of Colin's submissions, two ideas were
expanded upon and resulted in the following tag line :

   EnTelligence...Smarter Prospecting.  Online.  Worldwide.

Congratulations to Colin for providing the catalyst that resulted in a
unique, "catchy", concise, and meaningful tag line for our strategic effort.

Thanks to all who participated in our contest.  We received over 80
submissions making a decision on only one winner a real challenge.

Please pass this announcement along to your staff and others who
participated.  Thank you.

Mary, Avril, Chris, and Richard


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001
10:06 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/01/2001 09:37 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/1/01


Jeff, attached is Georges review for tomorrow.  Please review thoroghly, add
and make changes and be sure to check for errors.  There is no spell check on
the PEP system.

Please review and attache the document and return for signature.

thanks,
mike


Further to our last group meeting.  I have discussed and reviewed the confirmation, deal ticket and data entry process with the appropriate parties and believe that the charts attached provide for a clear understanding of the process we all need to follow.

The transactions start with the originator  and most of the obligation is on you guys to follow up with the paper.  In order that we start to control the output on a more formal basis, we will start by asking to see all paper for deals greater than 31 days....All I am asking is that the confirms desk generate the paper as required, get a copy to the originator and the originator has a OBLIGATION to sign off or make appropriate changes as soon as possible.

The Denver office follows a slightly different procedure as you guys have Theresa to enter deals into Sitara and I know that this effort is coordinated with Carol.  Don't change a thing, just ensure you are comfortable with the paper flow and that if there are any holes that they are filled with a revised procedure.

Let's see how this process works and re-visit at the end of the year.

If there are any questions regarding this note, pls do not hesitate to contact me.  If you think this note needs to be distributed to other people pls forward as required.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bronstein, Mara
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 5:44 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Physical and Financial Confirm Processes


Tom,

The conference in New York is held on  May 18 and May 19. I can visit Wharton
the day before.

Vince Kaminski

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 08:40:55 AM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Test

Vince:  I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to receiving
information relative to your visit to campus.

TOM PIAZZE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 4:52 PM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Subject: Test
>
>
>
> Test
>


Thanks, Lee.  Is there a firmed-up agenda yet?  If so, could you forward to
me?


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/03/2001>, published as of 12/03/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Kathy,  If I remember this correctly,  this is gas purchased by John Singer
behind the citygate that CES actually nommed directly.  We simply put the
deals into the system as buy/sells.  I talked to Chris and he said that B & B
will have the paper you need.  I hope this helps.Victor

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angel Fuller/NA/Enron@Enron, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Belden & Blake May-00 NFGD PA Invoice

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Belden & Blake May-00 NFGD PA Invoice

FYI.....
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
12/04/2000 04:04 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa K Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Belden & Blake May-00 NFGD PA Invoice

The deal 226556 with volume of 4991 was billed and paid separately.  Volume
was supposed to be 5000  (B&B still wants the 9 difference).  I just talked
to John Singer and he is checking with B&B and with  National Fuel Gas for
some paper.  He also indicated that this citygate gas was nommed into CES's
pool.  If so, someone should be billing CES for it .

WRP

Victor and Robert,
Please let us know if you can be of any help on this one.  The only deal with
volumes that I see for Beldan and Blake is deal 226556 and it appears to have
been netted with a CES deal 235398, in which case there would be nothing in
navigator.  The deal that I believe Wade is referring to is 345224, but it is
showing a zero volume in unify.

Terry, I see several deals out there for Beldan and Blake all at NYSEG but
with different prices.  The only one with volume is 226556 for a total volume
of 4991.  Is  possible that all the volume may have been put on the one deal
and should have been spread amongst the several deals?

Thanks!

Kathy

Wade R Price
12/04/2000 02:10 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Angel Fuller/NA/Enron@Enron, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Belden & Blake May-00 NFGD PA Invoice

 Volume Management (Angel Fuller), has been unable to locate any volumes for
Belden & Blake for May-00 NFGD PA (National Fuel Gas) gas under Columbia Gas
Transmission.  She researched her actuals and looked on Columbia Navigator
under ENA and NFGD PA  and was unable to find volumes as invoiced. B&B is
invoicing for 1302 mcf.  The Sitara deal that was used for March used CGAS
Point  21 NYSEG  02 Constrained Citygate and has pricing of $3.30 as per the
invoice.

Can you give us any more clues as to where we might find this gas?  Some
place else on Navigator? Can B&B supply us with some kind of statement?

Please let me know.

Thanks  WRP


Just wanted to see if these LC's were absolutely necessary at this time.  We just got another request today for two more LC's.  The total of all four LC's is now $11.98MM and all cash requests are now going through Bill Bradford to see which gets paid.

Is there any update on your negotiations with Standard Chartered?

Thanks,

JR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Mata, Jessie; Howard, Kevin A.
Cc:	Richardson, James
Subject:	RE: New L/C Req

What would you like me to do?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mata, Jessie
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Richardson, James
Subject:	FW: New L/C Req

James Richardson asked me to forward to you.  We are not sure Standard Charter can do these.  We also have around 20 amendment requests from EOTT on date extensions past the 12/31/01 drop dead date.

Please advise.

Thanks,
Jessie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Peter
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Maria J Mata/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	New L/C Req

					 << File: New LC Request Matador.doc >>

Peter Chen
Credit Specialist
EOTT Energy Corp.
(713) 993-5223 - ph
(713) 402-2887 - fx


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/18/2000 03:14
PM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 09:27 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martin W Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement

What I was told by your secretary and Marty was that ENA was keeping one of
the signed originals, and I picked up the other to give to Schroeder.  I do
not exactly know where ENA's original went.  Lets ask Marty.

To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement

I thought that someone retrieved the originals (which has been signed by GE
but not Enron) while I was in Ft. Worth for my dad's surgery. Marty mentioned
that you were looking for them, so I thought  he had given them to you (he's
out this week).  I have not seen the termination agreement since I returned.
Did you and John leave fully executed termination agreements in my office?
Maybe someone else picked them up.

I can't tell you what's going on with the assignment.  Perhaps Peggy Banczak
can help out with that.

Kay

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 08:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement

Schroeder and I left two signed originals with you, so what does "processed"
mean.  Yes, thankyou for asking, GE has received their fully executed
original, and therefore should be prepared to issue the invoice to
Purchaser.  But I have not seen the invoice yet.

What is the status of the assignment of the GE contract to Mitsui?  Did the
invoice go to them?

To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitro/Termination agreement

I haven't seen a signed copy of the termination agreement cross my desk.  I
just want to make sure that the fully executed document has been processed.

Thanks,

Kay


We have some small annoying park & loan deals on Iroq for July.  The parking
deal is 323553 and the loan deal is 323558.  When we get cut by an upstream
or downstream pipeline, Iroq uses the park & loan contract to balance the
supplies and markets.


Justin McSimov
1917 W. Evergreen Ave
Chicago, IL 60622
jmcsimov@netscape.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Justin McSimov


Hi Lee,

Just wanted to check to see if you will be around tomorrow.  I'm trying to
get things lined up on multiple fronts, and all roads lead to you.

Thanks,

Kay


A phone conference was held to day 12/11/2001 between all the Hub partners concerning the 2002 operating budget. This meeting included TW, NWPL and PNM.
All parties verbally agreed to the budget for 2002, if you all remember it was agreed to in 2000 to have a flat rate budget through 2003 with a 3.5% increase each year.

John Buchanan


There is a very good website for getting information regarding current events - www.drudgereport.com  I highly recommend you read it if you want to get the "real scoop" about what is going on in the World Trade Center bombings.  As to who is responsible there is almost overwhelming evidence that Osama Bin Laden was heavily involved if not the mastermind and/or financier.  If you are interested -  read the article below that gives a breakdown on who is believed to be responsible.
Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist that has targeted American people before (embassy bombings in 1998 and attack on USS Cole in Yemen earlier this year) and it would be in America's best interest to end his reign of terror by ending his life!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. focuses on Bin Laden links with Hizbullah, Arafat's Fatah

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Friday, September 14, 2001
WASHINGTON - The United States is investigating whether a coalition of Palestinian, Iranian and Lebanese groups joined to help launch the suicide attacks in New York and Washington.

U.S. defense sources said the Pentagon and CIA are quickly coming to the conclusion that Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama Bin Laden was the sponsor of the attack. But they said Bin Laden is believed to have used a range of Islamic groups for logistics and support.

The groups being investigated include the Fatah movement headed by Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, the sources said. Another group being examined for a link to the U.S. attacks is the Iranian-backed Hizbullah, Middle East Newsline reports.

"Most of it today points to Osama Bin Laden," Sen. Charles Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said. "But the speculation at the end of the road is that he and his network were very much involved with Hizbullah, Fatah and other."

Grassley was one of at least two dozen House and Senate members who were briefed by U.S. intelligence agencies since the bombing.

A U.S. official confirmed that the administration has not ruled out that Bin Laden was provided aid by a range of Arab and Islamic groups. But the official said no determination has been made.

"We want to be sure we understand all the connections, not just one connection," the official said. "As we find out who actually perpetrated the crime, as we find out who they're connected with, as we find out who could be considered harboring them, I think it'll come clear."

Analysts and some congressional sources said the Bush administration appears unwilling to thoroughly investigate the involvement of Iraq in the U.S. attacks. They said that the administration fears that targeting Iraq would dash hopes for an Arab coalition against terrorism in the Middle East.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the United States has not yet determined who was behind the bombing. Rumsfeld said a determination would have to be made soon.

The administration has requested $20 billion for a counterterrorism campaign. Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said much of the requested allocation would prepare the military for an expected counterattack.

"I don't think we know the breakdown yet, partly because the needs are so enormous," Wolfowitz said. "A significant piece of this is going to be to bring our armed forces to the highest level of preparedness."

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank, Laura [mailto:lfrank@vignette.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:02 AM
To: 'Michael Wilkes'; 'Christine Finch'; astephens@crushinteractive.com;
dax@cypressmail.com; austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net;
Frank, Laura; lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com;
muc@earthlink.net; mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com;
tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com; strangle_2000@yahoo.com;
zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: RE: New WTC

A more mature way to deal with the situation would be to wait until the
government proves he is responsible, rather than send hate mail & cause
added tension between the two countries!

Don't be so ignorant!  It's UN-American!

Whoever is responsible will be taken care of - we don't need to take it upon
ourselves.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wilkes [mailto:Michael.Wilkes@neonsys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:40 AM
To: 'Christine Finch'; astephens@crushinteractive.com;
dax@cypressmail.com; austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net;
lfrank@vignette.com; lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com;
muc@earthlink.net; mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com; Michael
Wilkes; tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com;
strangle_2000@yahoo.com; zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: RE: New WTC

Nice...

Here is another good one.
http://www.thegunsearch.com/target.pdf

-----Original Message-----
From: Christine Finch [mailto:christine_v_finch@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: astephens@crushinteractive.com; dax@cypressmail.com;
austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net; lfrank@vignette.com;
lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com; muc@earthlink.net;
mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com; Michael.Wilkes@neonsys.com;
tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com; strangle_2000@yahoo.com;
zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: Fwd: New WTC

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Please CC Stacey neuweiler and Ami Chokshi on any wellhead changes. Thanks.

D

Tom Acton@ENRON
03/08/2000 11:48 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Well Heads

Daren, EOG  called and said that the well behind 986296 which has been down
for a week from 7100 to 4400 for the last week or so needs to stay at the
4400  for the rest of the month.  I  changed the ticket for that.  This was
per Suzanne Saldivar.  Also Shoreline reduced the meter 6722 from 30 to 24.
also changed that. last Cody went from 7666 to 7600 at meter 6722.  Both
Shoreline and Cody were per customer request.


I agree.   I told Gary you could make the call.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Adele:
This looks fine to me.  I look forward to receiving your drafts.
carol


Where are you gonna be on Nov. 7?  Victory parties (or defeat parties) I'm
sure.  I may be in DC at least for the afternoon--gonna have any time free?
DF


Well, I personally would like your input, although I'm not clear who will end
up with it.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           10/10/2000 02:27 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Option Agreement and Easement

I snooped around and found out that Ann Elizabeth White is the author (I
don't know her, but she is with Barbara Grey's group).  I really think we
should revise portions of it.  Do you want my input?  I am making some
handwritten changes to talk to you about.
K-

To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/10/2000 02:19 PM

To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

This was sent to me by one of the developers.  I believe it relates to an
expansion (or new interconnection) of the Caledonia facility.  I don't know
which lawyer has been working on it, so I'm sending it around to see if
anyone claims it. Chris thought that someone from Power Trading may have been
working on it.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/10/2000 12:48 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Kay,

This is the format for the land options that Robert Shaw of New Century is
using in Caledonia, MS.  Please advise if these documents are appropriate.

Thanks,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

Mona Harvey <harveym@ncess.com> on 10/10/2000 11:20:08 AM
Please respond to "harveym@ncess.com" <harveym@ncess.com>
To: "Chris Booth (E-mail)" <Chris.Booth@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Chris,
 Robert Shaw asked me to send these documents to you.

Please call either of us at 713-757-9771 if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Mona Harvey

 - Easement - Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc
 - Option to Purchase ROW-Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc


Hey:
1.  Theoretically we could agree upon a trade and cross it on ICE after hours when the risk that someone else gets inside is remote.  This is a prearranged trade and is illegal on Nymex, but it is my understanding it will be legal on ICE assuming ICE uses the IPE clearing platform, where prearranged trading is legal.   Agree about liquidity.  I dont think this really helps ICE's volumes, nor liquidity.  Funds want liquidity so they will not flock to ICE in the current state.
2.  My guess is not intercommodity, but maybe intracommodity.  For instance, a gas daily swap against front month futures may have lower margin than the 2 trades additive.

Important Note: ICE is our competition and I am very,very wary to support their system, unless absolutely necessary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abramo, Caroline
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	'doug@campbell.com'
Cc:	Zivic, Robyn
Subject:	ICE

Hi..
I hope you are all ok.. I am sorry for any losses that may have touched your friends and family..

I looked at the ICE/LCH announcements.

I have a few questions:
1. Will ICE be able to work as a deal entry system as well as mechanism to post markets?

My concern here is that under the Deutsche proposal we would be able to do a deal with you over the phone and then post it to their system.. and no other market participant would be able to see that transaction.. it would then go straight to the clearing.

Currently, I'd say that only 2% of the time ICE has a tighter market than EOL.. this because they do not have the liquidity (and likely will not).

There is not a high probability we would ever contribute to this liquidity over our own system (Enron online) so the ability to deal directly with you in still imperative.

2. Can margin at LCH be netted across products?

Looking forward to speaking.
Thanks and Regards,
Caroline


Ok, I'm almost done forwarding emails.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 05:32
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 05:30:02 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: FW: Compared document

It finally looks correct.  Once again, I apologize for the extended
delay.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Gregory, Donnye
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 6:21 PM
> To: Thompson, Peter J.
> Subject: Compared document
>
> This time I remembered the attachment. <<554888 Redline.doc>>
 - 554888 Redline.doc


Hey sugar, I am going to go straight to the bar.  We are meeting John at Sullivans for just a few minutes.  I will come home before I go to get my haircut.  I am not leaving here till about 3:30.  I love you.

The Pigs


Does he know any of the names identified by Sophie ?

Sidney Cox
2000-02-23 19:31
To: Jarek Astramowicz/WAR/ECT@ECT, Jarek Dybowski/WAR/ECT@ECT, Krzysztof
Forycki/WAR/ECT@ECT, Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MBA Polish speakers

Vince was in the office today and I mentioned to him the difficulties we are
having in finding good quality Polish MBAs.
Vince has kindly agreed to make contacts and forward some names to us.

Sid


George,

 Below is a list of questions that Keith and I had regarding the Westgate
project:

 Ownership Structure

 What will be the ownership structure? Limited partnership? General partner?

 What are all the legal entities that will be involved and in what
capacity(regarding ownership and
 liabilities)?

 Who owns the land? improvements?

 Who holds the various loans?

 Is the land collateral?

 Investment

 What happens to initial investment?

 Is it used to purchase land for cash?Secure future loans?

 Why is the land cost spread out on the cash flow statement?

 When is the 700,000 actually needed? Now or for the land closing? Investment
schedule?

 Investment Return

 Is Equity Repayment the return of the original investment?

 Is the plan to wait until the last unit is sold and closed before profits
are distributed?

 Debt

 Which entity is the borrower for each loan and what recourse or collateral
is associated with each
 loan?

 Improvement

 Construction

 Are these the only two loans?  Looks like it from the cash flow statement.

 Terms of each loan?

 Uses of Funds

 How will disbursements be made?  By whom?

 What type of bank account?  Controls on max disbursement? Internet viewing
for investors?

 Reports to track expenses vs plan?

 Bookkeeping procedures to record actual expenses?

 What is the relationship of Creekside Builders to the project?  Do you get
paid a markup on subcontractors as a
 general contractor and paid gain out of profits?

 Do you or Larry receive any money in the form of salary or personal expenses
before the ultimate payout of profits?

 Design and Construction

 When will design be complete?

 What input will investors have in selecting design and materials for units?

 What level of investor involvement will be possible during construction
planning and permitting?

 Does Creekside have specific procedures for dealing with subcontractors,
vendors, and other professionals?
 Such as always getting 3 bids, payment schedules, or reference checking?

 Are there any specific companies or individuals that you already plan to
use? Names?

These questions are probably very basic to you, but as a first time investor
in a project like this it is new to me.  Also, I want to learn as
much as possible from the process.

Phillip


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 02:50
PM ---------------------------

Dave Scott@EES
08/29/2000 07:16 AM
To: FOM Direct
cc: FOM cc
Subject: 1st Revised September FOM volumes

Please see the comments page of the attachment for details of the updates ...
and call me if you have any questions.

David
713-345-7692


403-870-8015 - Gary Cell


I am out of the office until Monday, November 26.  If you need someone urgently, please contact Jessica Anaya at x36392.  Happy Thanksgiving.


Please see the following attachments for participant revisions.

Thanks, Geynille


Thanks for pointing that out.  Mark

	Edmund Cooper
	02/21/2001 12:23 PM

		 To: ECT London European Trading, T Paul Johnson/EU/Enron@Enron, Janet
Wood/EU/Enron@Enron, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Slade/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Change to standard ISDA Schedule

Dear All,

In the course of current ISDA Master Agreement negotiations with an
Australian counterparty it has come to my attention that the ISDA netting
opinion for Australia specifies that certain Sections of the ISDA Master
should not be altered; otherwise reliance on the opinion, and close-out
netting, could be jeopardised.  In particular the opinion specifies that
Section 2(a)(iii) should not be altered.

Enron has a standard alteration to Section 2(a)(iii) in Part 5 of its
standard form Schedule, viz.

"(a) Conditions Precedent.  The condition precedent set forth in clause (1)
of Section 2(a)(iii) shall not apply to payments owed by a party if the other
party shall have satisfied in full all its payment obligations under Section
2(a)(i) and shall at the relevant time have no future payment obligations
whether absolute or contingent, under Section 2(a)(i)."

Obviously, in the case of Australian counterparties this condition precedent
should not be included in our documentation.

In addition, there are a number of other countries (including Germany, Italy,
South Korea and Switzerland) where the effectiveness of the ISDA netting
opinion presupposes that certain Sections of the Master, including Section
2(a)(iii), are not altered in any material respect. To that end I would
suggest that our standard condition precedent does make a material alteration
and that it should not be included in ISDA Master Agreements with
counterparties trading from these jurisdictions.

Certainly from the London end, I think that when we start negotiations with a
new counterparty we should check the ISDA opinions to ensure that we don't
trip ourselves up.

Regards,

Edmund


Rich Tucker says his firm works for Legg Mason and might be a problem.  Do you
recall the name of the lawyer (and law firm) for Legg Mason whom you met with
in Washington ??  If he's with Reed Smith, Tucker is out.  If he's not with
Reed Smith, maybe we can proceed.

   ................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


Nick,

Dinner on Sunday would work  for me. I shall stay
in the Bay area till Monday morning.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 09/28/2000 08:33:38 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron/Stanford Program

Hi Vince,

I am on the technical program committee of the Infocom 2001 conference,
and we are meeting in New York City on Saturday, October 14th, to select
papers for the conference program. I'm leaving Stanford on Friday and
getting back on Sunday.

It might be a possibility to have dinner together on Sunday, if that would
work for you. In that case I would have to reschedule my flight to land
in SFO earlier than I'm currently scheduled to land.

Would dinner on Sunday work for you? Any chance we can meet Monday for
lunch?

I look forward to seeing you.

Best Regards,

Nick

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> I shall be in Stanford Oct 14 - 15, visiting my family.
> I would be glad to meet you (and possibly Giuseppe - your call) for lunch.
> Please, let mer know if you are free on one of these days. Saturday would
> work better for me.
>
> Vince
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 09/21/2000 02:09:46 PM
>
> To:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
> cc:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> Subject:  Re: Enron/Stanford Program
>
> Stinson,
>
> Great! I'm looking forward to a very productive collaboration.
> I'll immediately start doing Giuseppe's papers, for him to work
> on the Enron/Stanford program.
>
> Many Thanks to you and Vince, and I hope to see you soon at Stanford
> or Enron. If I remember correctly, Vince is visiting Stanford in
> October.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> Stinson.Gibner@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > I spoke with Paul Racicot, head of trading for  EBS, North America this
> > morning.   He said that he is happy to send the $100,000 for your program
> > from his budget.   I have forwarded to him the draft letter to accompany
> > the funds and will try to follow up to make sure that the money is sent
> > promptly.
> >
> > --Stinson


Can we discuss this on Monday?

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001 10:45 AM -----

	"Brian Stone" <htebs@huber.com> 06/08/2001 09:33 AM 	   To: <Mark.Whitt@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Re: San Juan long term Purchases

I'm very interested.  Can you put together a proposal?
Brian

>>> <Mark.Whitt@enron.com> 06/08/01 10:27AM >>>

I have been working on the San Juan deal we discussed.  The expansions
don't look very good.  Sonora Pipeline which is the Kinder
Morgan/Calpine
project is doubtful.  The rates on it look pretty good ($.39) but that
is
because they need subscriptions of  750 MM/d for 20 years.  It doesn't
seem
to feasible right now and they don't seem very confident in their
ability
to get it done.  The Transwestern expansion is only out of the Permian
basin so it won't fit and we believe that El Paso will be the same
although
that has yet to be determined.  However, it seems unlikely  that El
Paso
will expand out of the San Juan becuase their load growth is primarily
on
the south leg.

That is the bad news!  The good news is that we have existing space
that we
acquired on El Paso that began in June and continues through May of
2006.
Since the spreads have come in it is probably priced pretty well and I
believe we would give it to you at market.  We could structure it like
our
Wyoming deal in that we would manage the capacity and California
Border
sales for you.  I believe the space we have goes to PG&E.  The other
good
point is that you could control the ROFR in 2006.

Let me know if this is something you are interested in and I will work
up a
proposal for you.

Thanks

Mark