Sorry, I forgot the attachment.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Hooser, Steve
Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; Miller, Stephanie; Little, Kelli; Garza, Maria
Cc:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.; '"Zdunkewicz, David" <davidzdunkewicz@akllp.com>@ENRON'; Sager, Elizabeth; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	RE: Motion To Reject Gas Transportation Contracts

This morning I had the opportunity to discuss the issue of Transportation Contract rejection with David Zdunkewicz of Andrews and Kurth.  He and his partner Jeff Spiers have been advising other Enron divisions regarding the contract rejection process.

I am told that a motion has been filed with the bankruptcy court requesting that shorthand procedures be established for the purpose of allowing the various Enron Debtors to reject executory contracts.  That motion is apparently slated to be heard on January 7.  The attached template describes the information that must be filed with the court and forwarded to the creditors' committee and to the relevant counterparty whose contract is being rejected.  Assuming that the order is approved, we'll be able to start rejecting transportation contracts as early as January 8.

Kelli and Maria,

In order to expedite the process, could you please fill out the attached template, providing the information requested.

Please call with any questions.

Thanks for your help.

Steve Van Hooser

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Hooser, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; Miller, Stephanie; Little, Kelli; Garza, Maria
Cc:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	FW: Motion To Reject Gas Transportation Contracts

Attached is an e:mail that I forwarded to Jeff Speirs, a bankruptcy attorney with Andrews and Kurth who will be assisting with the mechanics of rejecting the out of the money transportation agreements that you all have identified.  I imagine that we will need full company names, contact persons and addresses in order to place the different pipes on notice of the motion to reject.  Could you please coordinate the gathering of this information so that we will be in a position to act on it as soon as possible after New Years?  Thanks for your help.

Steve Van Hooser

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Hooser, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	'jspiers@aklp.com'
Cc:	Sager, Elizabeth; Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	Motion To Reject Gas Transportation Contracts

Jeff,

I am an Enron Wholesale Services attorney who is advising on ENA gas transportation matters.  Elizabeth Sager suggested that I contact you about assisting me with the preparation of a Motion to Reject the bulk of the executory transportation service agreements that ENA has with interstate pipeline companies.

The attached spreadsheet summarizes the terms of said transportation agreements; please note that the first sheet of the spreadsheet file describes the 5 transportation contracts that ENA wishes to assume; the remainer are out of the money transportation and storage arrangements that ENA desires to reject.  Please review the attached and let me know if it contains sufficient information with which to proceed with the preparation of the Motion.

I imagine you will have plenty of questions. . . . I myself have a number of questions regarding the agency relationships shown on the spreadsheet, as well as ENA's right or need to reject those Service Agreements under which ENA has heretofore released pipeline capacity to third parties.

I look forward to speaking with you about these matters as well as determing the timeframe for rejecting these contracts.

Steve Van Hooser
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-7238(o)
713-582-6413(c)
713-646-3490 (fax)

 << File: Transport-Storage Review-MAIN FILE(12-21-01).xls >>


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042512.txt


All -

O:ERMS is virtually out of diskspace. If you have any large files that can be
zipped or deleted please do so.  We had to delete files last night just so we
could save our p&l's.  We have a program which will show all files over a
certain meg.  and which haven't been used prior to any date of your
choosing.  If you need this please let me know.

Thanks


The EPA Houston, Texas facility has issued a renewable power Request for
Information (RFI).  This RFI is attached and is posted at
http://www.fedbizopps.gov , under Solicitation Number GS-00P-02-BSD-0001.

Responses are due November 9. Respondents to this RFI will be kept informed
of the EPA Houston, TX renewable power purchase plans.

Let me know if you want to be removed from my renewable power purchase
mailing list.

  <<Houston RFI.doc>>

Chandra Shah
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)
1617 Cole Blvd, MS 2723
Golden, CO 80401-3393
303-384-7557
303-384-7411 (fax)
chandra_shah@nrel.gov


Dung --

Best to start with Jean Ryall (in Austin).  Different utilities in different places of restructuring.

By the way, aren't you in EBS?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tran, Dung
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Texas Update

Jim,

Who is the reg person for Texas?  Are the tariffs for 1/1/2001 available yet?  Thanks.

Dung


I forget my attachments all the time.  Sorry!


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 07:35 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	09/18/2000 04:09 PM

		 To: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Please print the original message and all of the attachments.  Thanks.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 04:09 PM -----

	Barton Clark
	09/18/2000 03:13 PM

		 To: Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re:

Attached are the revised Proposal Sheets and Exhibit A thereto that I have
initialled and given today to  Lisa Mellencamp. Also included are copies
marked to show changes to the versions you forwarded me this am. Re your
voice mail this afternoon, I understood the 6% dividend rate in the memo
asset description was calculated by someone in your group from data in the
Stock Purchase Agreement ( I did not independently make the calculation), and
that you may want to delete the reference in any case. I went ahead and
returned the attached to Lisa Mellencamp without waiting for your response as
they are trying to get these all in today, but if the 6% should come out, I
can rerun the Proposal Sheet to delete it, or if it is correct or otherwise
is immaterial, we can leave the Proposals alone on that point. Let me and
Lisa Mellencamp know if you have any other questions or comments on the
copies of the Proposal Sheets and Exhibit A thereto delivered to Lisa earlier
today.

	Brian Schwertner@ENRON
	09/17/2000 11:50 PM

		 To: Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re:

Due to options outstanding for Catalytica that have a separate value from the
preferred shares that we already carry, we have created two Raptor proposal
sheets for the assets.  One for the Catalytica options and one for the
preferred shares.

Please review the following documents and let me know if you have any
questions.

Brenda Whitehead@ECT
09/15/2000 02:25 PM
To: Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

per the request of Bart Clark, please see these attachments:


Which is kind of funny b/c now she sits right behind him.  He really thinks
he's the man...should I let him in on the truth.


Scott,

Attached are the two deals we booked last week for Jared.

They are basically identical, with only slight modification on the price for
June-Sep.  Let me know which deal they want to unwind.  I need to get risk to
run a mini-book so I can tie it to the model.

I will come up in a few minutes to discuss.

Eric


Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Sherri, I will be there.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001
10:55 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           02/16/2001 05:18 PM

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stan
Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Corporate Policy Committee Meeting - Thursday, Feb. 22

A corporate policy committee meeting has been scheduled on Thursday, February
22, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., in EB30C1; we can video conference you in
this room if necessary.  Lunch will be provided.

Additional details are forthcoming.  Please indicate your attendance below
and return to me via e-mail.  Thanks, and have a great weekend.  SRS

I will attend  ____

I will not attend ____

Attend via video conference    _____

 From which office         _____________


Thanks, Dan.  We will work to accommodate your schedule.

Daniel Reck
11/28/2000 04:31 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: depositions of enron officials

I'm out the first week of January, but have nothing else scheduled.  I
reserve the right to reschedule anything at anytime if there is a commercial
need.

--Dan

Michelle Cash
11/28/2000 03:50 PM
To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Bennett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: depositions of enron officials

Hello, everyone.  Please let me know which of these dates works best for
you.  It would be most helpful if you give me a range of available dates for
both preparation and the deposition itself.  That way, I can find overlapping
dates on which you all are available.

Thanks a lot.

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 03:48
PM ---------------------------

"Tim C. Carrico" <tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com> on 11/28/2000 07:15:09 AM
To: "Michelle Cash (E-mail)" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
cc: "Charles L. Woody" <cwoody@spilmanlaw.com>
Subject: depositions of enron officials

Michelle,

 Yesterday, counsel for Richard Clonch called, requesting January
dates for the Enron depositions.  He provided me with the following dates
possible dates; 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/8, 1/9, 1/10, 1/11, 1/12, 1/22, 1/23, 1/24,
1/25, 1/26.

 I told him that I would forward these dates to Enron.  I will send
counsel for Richard Clonch availability dates for Enron Officials as soon as
I hear from you.

 Thanks

Tim C. Carrico
Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
email: tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com
phone:             (304)-340-3856
cell phone:       (304)-549-2681
fax:                  (304)-340-3801
address:           300 Kanawha Blvd., East
                       Charleston, W.Va. 25301


Hi Team!  I just extend CNG deal 116090 through 1/31/2001.


Good My Love,

    It is always a pleasure hearing from you. It is ironic that you e-mailed
me, I was on the computer and Aunt Pat asked me am I talking to you, and just
as her words came out, the computer chimed in and said you got mail. I check
it and low and behold there you were, My grandma Klumps Renee Davis.
     I got your e-mail Saturday and I ironed out the error in my web site,
therefore you can e-mail me at CHARLES200064@aol.com.
    I am going to place you on my buddy list so we can chat online. Write me
back when you get this message.


Hi Yumi,

Yes I realise the entities are going to be different if this turns out to be
a ENA ISDA but the by already having an ISDA with the counterparty we can
quicken the negotiation process, i.e. 'mirroring' the contract as you say,
and having the correct entities in place. Thats what I am proposing we do.
This is something we'll need to work with Martin on.

Thanks

Matthew

Yumi Takei
09/11/2000 12:38
To: Matthew Allan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin
Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT,
European Contract Management, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ISDA- Koch Energy Trading Inc

Hi Matt,

I believe we may need to set up a new ISDA since ECTRIC is a different entity
than ENA.  In the past we have mirrored an existing ENA ISDA in order to
create one between the CP and ECTRIC.  However, I'll wait to turn in any
requests until I hear what we already have with Koch.

Thank you,
Yumi

	From:  Matthew Allan                           09/11/2000 13:26

To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yumi Takei/OSL/ECT@ECT, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, European Contract
Management

Subject: Re: ISDA- Koch Energy Trading Inc

Hi Anthony,

Can you do me a favour and take a look into this ISDA. The traders in our
Oslo office have done a weather deal with Koch Energy Trading Inc.  The
counterparty mentioned they had an ISDA in place with ECTRIC. We are trading
as ECTRIC.   But maybe the CP was confused and thought it was ECTRIC instead
of ENA.

The trader here said she plans to do many more future trades with Koch, and
has been asking if we can amend the ENA ISDA to cover Oslo.

If you can just confirm what you've got, whats covered etc and if possible
send through a copy and I can liaise with Oslo and our legal dept to get them
covered.

Thanks

Matthew
830 36840

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Allan/LON/ECT on 09/11/2000 10:36
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Stephen Furter                           09/11/2000 10:24

To: Matthew Allan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ISDA- Koch Energy Trading Inc

Matt,

I spoke to Matthew Dawson, and he said there is an old ISDA out there, with
an effective & contract date of 23 May 1994 with ECT.
It was apparently negotiated in Houston, and the contact there is Tana Jones.

There is no copy here in London, but Matt said he would ask Tana, if we could
see one.

Regards
Stephen  (Ext:34716)

	From:  Matthew Allan                           09/11/2000 10:03

To: Stephen Furter/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ISDA- Koch Energy Trading Inc

Steve,

Do we have anything out there for this....should be an ISDA.

Dig out anything and everything we've got and send it through

cheers

matt


would gladly take a couple of cases


Please see the following attachment from Vlady Gorny.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
06:55 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Vladimir Gorny                           11/08/2000 07:07 PM

To: Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher
J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VaR Model

Attached below is the Excel-based VaR Calculator that allows VaR calculations
for up to 5 different curves and/or products. The results may be different
that those generated in the "official" VaR model, because it does not reflect
all the intricacies. We have developed an Ad-hoc VaR model that allows quick
calculations of VaR for a potential transaction, as well as the incremental
VaR on a given portfolio (using the "official" VaR model). We will make this
tool available to you via http://rac.enron.com/ in the near future (pending
IT implementation).

TJ,

I do not have a list of names of all the traders on the desk (individuals who
attended the VaR presentation). Could you please forward this e-mail to them.

Feel free to call me with any questions. Vlady.


That just means there is plenty of work to go around!

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/06/2001 08:49 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: PSEG

Just now getting to my emails (honestly).  You really were here early.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/06/2001 07:58 AM

		 To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carlos Sole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, jkeffer@kslaw.com,
ccampbell@kslaw.com
		 Subject: PSEG

Fred,

I suggest a phone call among the team today to make sure we are all on the
same wave length.  What is your schedule?

Thanks,

Kay


We have tentatively planned for two partners from the Chicago law firm of
Sidley & Austin to come visit us in our offices on Friday, Aug. 11 and to
give a presentation.  I say "tentatively" because I have not yet been able to
confirm Mark Haedicke's availability on that date -- I will try to do that as
soon as possible.

I would expect the presentation to take 1 to 2 hours -- I'm sure it could
take longer if we wanted it to, i.e., if there turned out to be some matters
that we wanted to discuss in further detail with them.  I think a morning
meeting would suit most people's availability better than an afternoon one;
please share your thoughts on this with me.

Enclosed is a rough outline of an agenda I have suggested to them for their
presentation.  If there are other matters you would like to hear them
discuss, I encourage you to let me know; I will pass all suggestions along to
them.

As most of you probably know, attorneys have a duty of strict confidentiality
to their clients, and this duty attaches from the moment a consultation
begins (regardless of whether a formal "engagement" has commenced).
Violation of this duty is grounds for disciplinary action by the governing
bar association.   On the other hand, I realize that we do not have an
established relationship with this firm or these lawyers.  All of that being
said, I will leave it to each of you as to your comfort level in asking
particular questions or sharing particular information.


Elizabeth -- As we discussed, billing will need to take place pursuant to
Section 30.8(e) (i.e., refund or credit to the releasing shipper).

Here is the language you requested for our posting:

In accordance with Section 30.9(f) of the General Terms and Conditions of
Transwestern's Tariff, Releasing Shipper shall remain liable to Transwestern
for payment of reservation charges and any applicable surcharges.

If you need anything further please don't hesitate to call.


Attached is the report for the week ended December 1, 2000.   Due to
technical difficulties, the report is back in the old style word document
format.    Jan will add this document to the website archive when she returns
to the office next week.

Here is GISB Order 587-M.

Here are EPMI's Comments to the GridFlorida RTO Filing.


no... i went with matt thurell from koch.  they've got some corporate
townhouse out there.  very nice.  good to see the old days of waste aren't
completely gone yet.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/05/2001 06:59:36 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: v/x

did you happen too meet my friend dwight anderson down there? a good guy. im
gonna take a wild gues since he was there and you were there and hes an enron
customer there is a good chance you guys were in the same place!! i got to
stay
at one of those swanky enron beaver creek chalets a few years ago so i know
whats up.
   this weather disappoints again.

John.Arnold@enron.com on 02/04/2001 10:13:24 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: v/x

i actually started writing this on thursday.  got distracted and left late
morning to go to Vail.  Apparently I missed a little craziness.  My point
on v/x is that forward spreads, months 3/4 and back, don't necessarily
trade on value, they trade on drawing a forward curve that makes
equilibrium between hedging and spec demand.  Look at k/m... do you think k
cash will average 3 cents above m.  i don't really see that scenario.  yet
that's what it is worth because the market says jv is worth $x and to get
there k/m=3.  The same argument applies to v/x.  i think this summer will
be exceptionally strong as we try to inject 2 bcf/d more gas than last
year.  But cal 2 will lag the move.  It's the main thing customers are
selling right now because every equity analyst and even Pira are telling
their customers that cal 2 will average 3.50.  so either the v/x and x/z
spreads come in or f/g g/h h/j blow out.  After this winter, who in there
right mind wants to buy f/g or g/h again.  my thought is that the primary
juice will be h/j but v/x and x/z will be under some pressure.  i'm a
seller at 9 and buyer at 5-6.  Not much in it either way though.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 04:47:22 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: v/x

you got me wrong-i wanna sell oct buy nov forward. look-two scenarios med
longer
term. we inject like mad early summer-economy stays crappy the frot of the
curve
gets slaughtered.-oct/nov goes to 3 cts sometime between now and end sep
   scenario 2-they dont enject what they want-oct /nov wil stay tite
between say
3-and 10 cts like this year but man after this winter they will panic at
some
point and buy the hell out of the winter strip and blow out oct /nov to 30
cts
cuz they panic. to me if that one was to ever backwardate it was this
summer-low
low stx and injections and they still blew out cuz they panicked about
winter-as
we see this winter now for good reason..?? capeche? i thinkit a win win

 you still in the damn mar/apr-i only sold a little prenumber-cant beleive
how
this got killed after-what changed?? from 1:30 to 2:05

John.Arnold@enron.com on 01/31/2001 05:41:45 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: v/x

quit pressuring them    i want to sell some too.  actually sold a few at 9
on the close

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 12:40:07 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: v/x

i hate hate that sprd-at 8 cts i think its such a good bearsprd-hope it
keeps
coming in. ill tell you why later


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Saldana, Alex
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Lamadrid, Victor; Loocke, Kelly; Ordway, Chris; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Jackson, Brandee; Choate, Heather; Bates, Kimberly
Subject:	Wedding Shower/Time/Date Changed

(Kim please forward to your group)

Alex Saldana
Administrative Assistant
Enron Networks
(713) 345-7389