Do you have an answer to Carol's question.
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/07/2000 02:57 PM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                07/07/2000 02:48 PM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: new format

David:
Thanks for sending this to me.  Since I will be hear through next Friday at
the latest, I would ask that once this chart has been completed that you
contact Mark Taylor to see who from our group will take this project over
while I am out.  Thanks.
Carol

	David P Dupre
	07/07/2000 02:27 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: new format

Hi,
Jeff asked me to forward the new report to you.

Here is the format of the new report and a brief description of each tab:

1. formerage-Willie's prior aging schedule. Do we want to see this for each
c/p? I think it would be helpful
2. aging-Current aging schedule by year
3. STC-Dcaf-Current physical STC information from Dcaf
4. STC-Tagg-Current physical STC information from tagg
5. financial-Current and new format. If you move the lower bar to the right
of the gray boxes, you will see the new columns
     which we've discussed.

I completed the master agreement column from the Lotus Notes database;

We are currently waiting on credit for the exposure information and their
assessment (e.g. 'credit concern', 'good credit', etc.);

Tagg is able to provide term information for each counterparty, but since it
is a time-intensive process, Ron Nolte is looking
into adding a button in tagg that will allow this and/or create a special
customized ongoing report;

I am in the process of completing the remaining two columns (i.e. do they
sign confirms?, if they don't, reasons why?)

Overall, I think that this new format, including my proposed aging schedule,
will be a valuable 'tool' for all involved in our
follow-up work.

Thanks
David

   Carol St Clair                07/06/2000 11:05 AM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Project

David:
Please keep in mind that we are not basing our decision on which
counterparties to contact solely based on exposure and credit concern
information, but rather based on all of the categories that Mark Taylor and I
have asked you to compile with respect to each counterparty so I don't want
the exposure numbers to be limited to any particular type of counterparty.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	David P Dupre
	07/06/2000 10:28 AM

		 To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Project

Hi,
I don't know how this was settled between Carol and Russell, and  I don't
understand why Russell would not
want to provide this exposure information to us.

As we discussed earlier last month, I think it would be good to select a
date, let's say July 5th in this case, and then go forward.

I like your idea of identifying whether the c/p is a 'credit concern' or a
'good credit', perhaps this could be listed in the 'status' column
on the following spreadsheet.

I have attached a list of updated counterparty names.

Thanks
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 10:09
AM ---------------------------
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Project

How did things get settled between Carol and Russell?   Looking over the
spreadsheet itself, I would be able to tell you right off which
counterparties we consider "Credit Concerns", where you would then prioritize
on your end.  Even though some counterparties may high high exposures, we
consider them to be "Good Credits" (for example Duke).  Once again, financial
exposures vary (sometimes very significantly) from one day to the next.
Therefore the totals you'll have for current exposures will not be validated
for more than a week, at the max.

Let me know how you want to go about this.  I think if I highlight which
counterparties we feel you should look into, this would go a lot faster.

Regards--VE


I just spoke with GE's counsel, and here's where we are:

Change the following for the final draft:
1.80  delete "remaining"
10.2.1  take out the note

Otherwise, GE had no comments.

Peter/Chris,

If you look on the spreadsheet I sent you earlier, it gives the unit numbers
for each of the projects.  You can figure out the guaranteed delivery dates
by matching up the delivery dates from the contracts with the number.  Also,
please fix the use of purchase amount in 10.10.6 as suggested by Dale.

The ESA deal has a change order associated with it (change order 3, attached
below) and that CO is not reflected in the amounts to be paid.

City of Austin has no change orders.  The assignee is Enron South America.

Thanks,

Kay


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/09/2001 03:40 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-09-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 03:40 PM -----

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/09/2001 03:38 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-09-01

Please see attached.


However, I'm sure your french is 3000 times better than mine.  I'm planning a
trip to paris at end of jan beg. of feb, by the way.  It really is the best
city in the world to visit

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Pierre Aury                           01/10/2001 08:34 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: lng shipping

i am sure your english will be about 2000 times better than mine so please
feel free to package the thing the way you think is best (perhaps a nice and
impressive 3 or 4 lines paragraph on egm could be a good intro?)  and just
copy me with what you have sent . give us your dates in london and let us
know if there is anything you want to discuss in details .

pierre

To: Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: lng shipping

Be happy to.  I may take the liberty of a little word-smithing if you don't
mind.  (and will show it to you before i send it) I should be over within the
next 4 weeks.
Regards.
Jeff

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Pierre Aury                           01/10/2001 03:18 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Hitch/EU/Enron@Enron, Eric
Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: lng shipping

jeff
long time no talk on lng shipping matters. during the xmas/new year period we
discussed a lot with brad and have come up with some clear ideas on how to
proceed to drive quickly a market change in the field of lng shipping. the
best bet at this stage looks like mosk the big japanese shipping co . they
control directly or indirectly 40 lng vessels. the lng shipping market is so
inefficient that about 20 pct of that fleet is either iddle or under
utilized. the idea is to team up with mosk to have access to their idle fleet
at marginal cost plus small margin. this would enable us to ask them to give
us a ship every time we can develop a spot lng cargo : no capital outlay, no
take or pay obligation, win /win situ as mosk would then make money (that s
their incentive) out of an iddle fleet and we would then gain access to ships
enabling us to make money on lng spot cargoes without entering long term
comitment on the shipping front .

mosk being japanese , in order to jump start the entire thing we need a fax
to be sent from high level in enron to high level in mosk prior brad and
myself go and meet these guys in tokyo to discuss the idea in more details
(at lower level in mosk the idea is known and accepted/tentative date already
set last days of jan/early feb for the first meeting) . would you mind to
send such a fax along the lines i propose herebelow asap  ?

thanks in advance . any questions please feel free

pierre

quote
to

Mr Iwata , Executive Officer, LNG Division , MOSK
cc Mr Hashimoto , Manager, Project Development team, LNG Division, MOSK
both on fax number (81) 3 35 87 77 48
Mr Amine Hakim, MOSK London
on fax number (44) 870 130 97 37

 Dear Sir

Enron, through its newly formed Enron Global Market business unit, is
targeting the LNG commodity and shipping markets as being key markets for the
coming years mainly on account of their growth potential but as well because
these markets are  ripe for a change in their very nature.

MOSK , because of the sheer size of its LNG shipping fleet and Enron, because
of its proven ability to make markets change, are uniquely positioned to team
up and drive these changes rather than react to them.

Enron would like to explore with MOSK if and how both companies could
cooperate in the lng field to achieve this.

Brad Hitch on the commodity front and Pierre Aury on the shipping front will
be leading this efforts on the Enron side and you can expect to have them
contacting you very shortly to start these discussions.

Yours faithfully

signed
Jeffrey A Shankman         or         Mike McConnell
tittle (in big letters please ...)


Congratulations Kathleen and Peter.  This ought to make this week's ARM
meeting, well, sort of interesting.

Viva New Power!

Best,
Jeff

	"PennFuture" <pennfuture@pennfuture.org>
	11/03/2000 03:48 PM
	Please respond to "PennFuture"

		 To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:@mailman.enron.com;>
		 cc:
		 Subject: PennFuture's E-cubed

PennFuture's E-cubed is a commentary biweekly email publication concerning
the current themes and trends in the energy market.

November 3, 2000
Vol. 2, No. 22

Pennsylvania's First Successful CDS Auction

An important new regulatory skirmish has broken out before the Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission (PUC) over which company has won the right to
provide default generation service to 300,000 customers of PECO Energy, an
Exelon Company. This skirmish is actually good news for consumers and is the
fruit of the 1998 PECO Energy restructuring settlement agreement, a landmark
document that ended a ferocious regulatory war when all combatants signed it.

The &peace treaty8 includes a requirement that PECO Energy bid out default
service for 20% of its customers, and PECO has done so. Green Mountain Energy
Company is now challenging PECO Energy,s decision that New Power won the
auction to provide the settlement,s mandated default service.

Both Green Mountain and New Power are offering those 300,000 consumers small
rate reductions compared to customers receiving default service from PECO,
and more electricity generated from renewable energy resources. Specifically,
New Power and Green Mountain are offering generation service to Rate R
residential customers for approximately 5.54 cents per kilowatt-hour. That
offer is 3.11 cents per kilowatt-hour less than PECO Energy,s unbundled
generation and transmission rate of 8.65 cents per kilowatt-hour and 0.11
cents per kilowatt-hour less than the shopping credit of 5.65.

The consumer savings that these offers represent is masked or reduced by the
stranded cost payments that consumers must pay PECO Energy. Indeed, were it
not for stranded cost payments, the New Power and Green Mountain offers would
reduce total bills by about 3.11 cents per kilowatt-hour, or 20%.

The dispute between New Power and Green Mountain is noteworthy because it
proves that companies will compete vigorously to provide default service if
shopping credits and lengths of contracts are set at reasonable levels. It
also shows that renewable energy portfolio standards can be met economically.
Finally, the result of this case will switch more customers to competitive
suppliers in one day than the total number who switched in California over a
period of nearly three years.

When the PUC anoints New Power or Green Mountain as the winner, if all
299,300 consumers opt to stay with the CDS provider, the total number of
customers in Pennsylvania that will be served by a competitive supplier will
jump to more than 850,000. Of this total, 504,000 will be residential
customers of PECO, a number equal to 37% of the PECO residential class.

CDS Background: In Pennsylvania, there must always be a &default8 supplier or
&provider of last resort8 to assure that service is always available to all
customers. The incumbent utility is the default supplier, unless the PUC
decides otherwise. The default supplier must provide generation service to
customers who do not have a competitive supplier either because they chose
not to shop or did not find a willing supplier at an acceptable price. The
PECO Restructuring Case Settlement initially defined CDS service in paragraph
38:

&On January 1, 2001, 20% of all of PECO,s residential customers -- determined
by random selection, including low-income and inability-to-pay customers, and
without regard to whether such customers are obtaining generation service
from an EGS -- shall be assigned to a provider of last resort-default
supplier other than PECO that will be selected on the basis of a
Commission-approved energy and capacity market price bidding process. This
service shall be referred to as Competitive Default Service (&CDS8).8

The same approach was used in the other Settlements in the GPU, PPL and APS
restructuring cases. CDS reflects an effort to assure that there is at least
one other large competitor in each market. CDS also has a renewable portfolio
standard (RPS), even though there is no RPS for regulated utilities in
Pennsylvania. The winning bidder must supply:

&(2.0% of its offered energy supply for CDS service from renewable resources
of solar, wind, sustainable biomass (including landfill gas but excluding
incineration of Municipal Solid Waste), geothermal or ocean power. The
renewable energy increment shall increase by annual increments of 0.5%
thereafter.8

This increasing renewable requirement continues indefinitely, meaning that in
year four of the CDS there will be a 3.5% renewable requirement, 4% in year
five and so on. This is significant, as each extra percent of renewable
energy used to serve the 299,300 customer block prevents approximately 950
tons of NOx, 3200 tons of SO2, and 390,000 tons of CO2 from being emitted by
fossil fuel burning power plants.

PECO,s CDS RFP: Importantly, the PECO/Unicom merger case modified the CDS
bidding process as established by the 1998 settlement. Of particular note,
the revisions eliminated the &customer care8 functions from CDS, made the
contract three years long to help spread out return of start-up costs, and
instituted several rounds of selection in the event that prior efforts
yielded no successful CDS contract.

PECO issued its initial RFP for CDS on April 6, 2000, and Shell Energy
Services submitted the only bid. However, the PUC rejected the bid as
non-conforming and denied Shell,s Petition for Reconsideration of its
decision. Pursuant to the modifications in the merger settlement, PECO
entered into bilateral negotiations based on an August 24, 2000 RFP.

Three suppliers submitted conforming bids, and PECO selected New Power as the
winner on October 18, 2000. New Power is the new competitive supplier
actively marketing residential and small commercial customers in the PECO
service territory and is backed by Enron, AOL, and IBM.

PECO and New Power negotiated a complete contract that is before the PUC for
approval on November 9, 2000. Under the proposal, PECO and New Power expanded
the size of the CDS requirement to include 22% (299,300) of non-shopping
residential customers instead of 20% of all residential customers, whether
shopping or not. This change was designed to implement paragraph 39 of the
Restructuring Settlement, requiring adjustments to the numbers assigned to
CDS in order to have 35% of all PECO residential and commercial customers
obtaining competitive generation as of January 1, 2001. There also will be a
second round of assignment of non-shopping customers as of October 15, 2002
if New Power is providing CDS to fewer than 20% of all PECO residential
customers

New Power electricity will be 2% renewable in 2001, 2.5% renewable in 2002,
and 3% renewable in 2003 as required, but does not include a commitment to
exceed the requirements or provide cleaner power for the non-renewable
portion of the product.

The price for New Power,s CDS for Rate R customers would be 2.02% below the
shopping credit, while residential heating customers on Rate RH would pay
1.02% less than their shopping credit. For a Rate R customer, this would mean
that overall rates would fall .8% (as energy and transmission falls from 5.65
to 5.54); for Rate RH rates would fall .44%. Customers assigned to CDS may
still choose any competitive supplier, or opt out and retain default service
from PECO without penalty or charge. New Power will be able to offer its full
slate of energy and non-energy related products to these customers.

Green Mountain asserts that approval of the PECO/New Power contract is &not
in the public interest,8 arguing that PECO ignored Green Mountain,s offer
that included CDS pricing 2% below the shopping credit for all residential
customers, including those on residential heating or off-peak service. Like
the New Power proposal, the Green Mountain proposal would lower Rate R and RH
rates .8% and .44%, respectively. Green Mountain asserts that the New Power
rate cut for Rate R is only 1.83%, and not 2% and argues that its product is
better for the environment because the non-renewable portion of the product
would come from natural gas and hydro instead of system power generated
primarily from coal and nuclear fuels. If not declared the winning bidder,
Green Mountain proposes in the alternative that both they and New Power
receive CDS contracts.

In response, PECO states that all three bidders had the opportunity to submit
revised bids and that the Green Mountain revised bid was not submitted until
October 12, 2000, 13 days after the deadline and nine days after the
selection of New Power as the winning bidder.

The PUC will sort out the facts and arguments on November 9. Some think that
the PUC may very well split the 300,000 customer block between Green Mountain
and New Power.

Whatever the result, customers in the Philadelphia area should receive yet
another small price reduction, more renewable energy, and the opportunity for
a more competitive electricity market.

E-cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other publications.
Authors are available for print or broadcast.

Support E-cubed by becoming a member of PennFuture * visit our secure online
membership page at www.pennfuture.org by clicking on &Support Our Work.8

PennFuture, with offices in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a
statewide public interest membership organization, which advances policies to
protect and improve the state,s environment and economy. PennFuture,s
activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local,
state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a
state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public
advocacy.

We hope you found this informative and interesting. However, if you would
prefer not to receive future issues, please reply to this email and type
&unsubscribe8 in the subject line.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PROS Revenue Management Announces Record Third Quarter and YTD 2001

November 20, 2001-Houston- PROS Revenue Management, the world's leader in revenue management science and the pioneer and dominant provider of revenue management to the airline and energy industries, today announced that third quarter, although impacted by the tragic events of September 11, 2001, was a record revenue quarter for the company, and the company achieved low double digit operating income levels.  PROS posted revenue in the first nine months of the year of $27.7 million, which is a 36% increase over the previous year.  Record profits, along with positive cash flow, enhanced PROS' strong balance sheet.  PROS also posted record annual revenues and profits for 2000.

"Our goal is to be the clear leader in the new Revenue Pricing Optimization category," says Bert Winemiller, president and CEO of PROS.  "Our financial performance of record revenues, profits, and cash flow will enable PROS to maintain its commitment to achieving this goal and provide high value solutions to our clients."

PROS Pricing Revenue Optimization Solutions' major milestones in the first nine months of 2001 include:

o In the airline industry, PROS completed signed contracts with airline companies, including Aeropostal, Air Jamaica, All Nippon Airways, Cathay    Pacific, Delta Air Lines, Korean Air, Singapore Airlines, South African Airways, and TWA/American Airlines.
o Contracts were signed in the energy industry with major US gas pipeline companies.
o PROS concluded its second contract for Network Optimization (O&D) in the airline industry.  This product will become the standard for the       industry.
o Energy Pricing & Revenue Optimization Seminars were held with participation from industry leaders and Accenture.
o PROS hosted its first Pricing Optimization Web Seminar which covered pricing optimization principles common among virtually all industries.       Participants included executives of some of the strongest Fortune 500 companies.
o PROS completed the move of its headquarters to the ComTech Center in midtown Houston.  This state-of-the-art facility will assist in the       support of PROS' expansion both internally and into other industries.
o PROS announced its 9th Annual Pricing and Revenue Optimization Conference, the largest revenue management conference in the world, with     industry leaders, analysts and representatives from industries such as airline, energy, healthcare, hospitality, broadcast, rental car, and rail.  The    Conference will take place March 3-7, 2002.

About PROS
PROS Revenue Management is the world's leader in pricing and revenue optimization solutions and the pioneer and dominant provider of revenue management to the airline and energy industries. PROS provides system solutions to the airline, cargo, rail, energy, healthcare, and broadcast industries, and has delivered over 230 systems to more than 90 clients in 39 countries. PROS' clients include 15 of the top 25 carriers in the airline industry.

The PROS mission is to maximize the revenue of each client using PROS' world-leading revenue management science, systems solutions, and best practices business consulting. PROS' clients report annual incremental revenue increases of 6-8% as a result of revenue management. PROS' solutions forecast demand, optimize inventory, and provide dynamic pricing to maximize revenue.

Founded in 1985 in Houston, PROS Revenue Management has a six-year compounded revenue growth of 40%, in large part due to the intellectual capital of its staff. Nearly half of PROS' professional staff has advanced degrees and the staff speaks a cumulative total of 26 languages. The company is profitable with Year 2000 revenue of $29 million. For more information on PROS Revenue Management, please visit www.prosRM.com or call 713-335-5253.

PROS' 9th Annual Pricing and Revenue Optimization Conference will be March 3-7, 2002.  This premiere event will feature industry leaders participating in presentations, panel discussions, and product workshops.  Join industry colleagues, academics, and representatives from the international business community at large to discuss relevant topics specific to the airline industry and to the practice of revenue management.  We have broadened our scope this year to include separate sessions related to other industries benefiting from revenue management, such as Energy, Healthcare, Hospitality, Broadcast, Rental Car, and Rail.

More information and formal invitations are coming soon. In the meantime, be sure to save the following dates on your calendar:

March 3-7, 2002
Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa
Houston, Texas

If you have further questions or if you are interested in speaking at this event, joining discussions as a panelist, or becoming a sponsor, please contact Andrea Balfour at abalfour@prosRM.com.

Contact:
Candy Haase - VP Marketing
713-335-5253 / 713-335-8144 - fax
chaase@prosRM.com


you are killing me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whatever, I understand your embarrasment in getting caught

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

will you get it in your little skull that this time it was a guy.  that's why i immediately asked you.  and how would you know if i was staring, which i wasn't, unless you were?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

would you stop lying about the guy, Im not going to hold it against you for staring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that you want the male looker to come

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

just you baby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Can i bring your male admirer?


Mark,

The traders at enovate in the Chicago office would like to be able to use the
ICE system.  I understand that you are the person who should review these
agreements.  If you are not the right person, please let me know.  I am
sending a second e-mail that goes with this one.  Feel free to call me for
any additional information that you might need.

Stacy
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 10:46 AM -----

	Cary M Carrabine@ENRON
	04/30/2001 11:18 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

Attached below are the ICE Participant Agreement and the Service and Pricing
Schedules.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cary
(312)541-1243

----- Forwarded by Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001 11:16 AM -----

	Duuna Richardson <duuna.richardson@intcx.com>
	04/27/2001 05:53 PM

		 To: "'cary.m.carrabine@enron.com'" <cary.m.carrabine@enron.com>
		 cc: Bud Hum <bhum@intcx.com>
		 Subject: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

>    Dear Cary,
>
>    Per Bud Hum of Intercontinental, attached is some
> additional information about The ICE.
>
>    First, is an electronically executed copy of our
> Participant Agreement signed by each customer and second, our Service and
> Pricing Schedules.  If you have any questions,  please call Chuck Vice at
> 770.738.2129.  If not, you may execute(and also state which name needs to
> appear on the system) and return a copy to Chuck's attention at the
> address below at your earliest convenience.
>
>    Thank you for your interest.
>
>    Regards,
>
>    Duuna Richardson
>    IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
>    2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 400
>    Atlanta, GA  30328
>    Tel:    770.738.2137
>    Fax:   770.951.5481
>    ---------------------------------------------------
 <<Participant Agreement 080200.doc>>  <<Service and Pricing Schedules.doc>>

 - Participant Agreement 080200.doc
 - Service and Pricing Schedules.doc


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

PRELIMINARY


Calling it an error is unfair.  I am not prepared to offer her AND her husband a job by Friday.  She concedes that her role on the power side may be project-like and therefore short-term.  I will keep in touch with her and open the door later.  London is being freaky about people finding homes ASAP, and it doesn't match my timeframe.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Richter, Brad
Subject:	RE:

As I said in the note of yesterday - I have no interest in having the meeting. My assistant is away so its just a  misunderstanding.   See yesterday's note, we are going in on Monday.

I think losing Amita is a  major error.  There are no other candidates in the organisation with her expertise apart from Zipper, Forster and Savita.

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

I saw that our Friday meeting got rescheduled until next week, after your budget meeting with OOC.  I'd be interested to know what number you'll be assuming from EOL in those discussions.  I got your email, by the way... we're putting a little more thought into it than that.

Also, Amita is going to accept a project job with UK power.  She needs an answer by Friday on her and her husband's jobs.  Having not spoken to any other candidates but her at this point, I can't commit that soon.  We'll keep in touch with her on the off chance that her power job is short term and she still wants to come to Houston.

Brad


- 11_15_01LO.xls


I look forward to meeting with you both on Tuesday.  Here's a list of the
funds we have in the pipeline and the status:

MACRO FUNDS-
1.Harvard (Docs done)- We have been dealing with them in crude, products, and
natural gas- we just need to keep track of their credit line.

2. Tudor- we have docs with Ospraie, Tudor Proprietary, Tudor Offshore
(Bermuda)- dealing regularly..

3. Catequil (Negotiating) docs with Offshore and Onshore- waiting for
response from Brent and Paul on their latest comments to the ISDA.  Confirms
from all the deals we have done have been returned to Carol.  They are set up
in the system; we hold margin.

4. AIG (Negotiating)- Offshore, Onshore- need to get documents out to them-
credit work sheet in legal.. still have not gotten out a confirm to them on
the trades they have done....we have them set up in the system and hold
margin.

5. Union Spring (Negotiating)- Offshore, Onshore- should be done on this one.

6. SAC Capital - possibly only one vehicle in Anguila- need to get the
document to them- credit work sheet in legal.

7. Quark Power (Negotiating)- 2 entities- Quark Power and Amaranth.  Held by
Paloma Partners- waiting for their comments on a few points.

8. Valentis and CD Holdings- Held by Wexford Capital - need to get document
to them- credit work sheet in legal.  They want to proceed with the 8 year
deal Monday.

9. Global Advisors- trade through Cargill.. Frank Sayre working on POA..
waiting for this back.

10. Argonaut- onshore, offshore vehicles- sending documents.. no credit
assessment yet.

11. SOROS- brought through system by credit derivative group.. but need a
credit opinion for ENA (to do energy trades).

PROGRAM FUNDS-
12. Renaissance - credit worksheet in legal- need to get docs to them.
13. Campbell+ Co - will likely want to look at a three way transaction
between Enron, themselves, and a bank
14. Sunrise Capital - getting documentation.


Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Here is the latest Calpine model.
Ben


For your reading pleasure...

AOL/Time Warner Merger:  12/13/00
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4134177.html?tag=st.ne.ron.lthd

Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191


Valerie Franek
Saratoga, CA 95070
valerie@digitalmaven.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Valerie Franek


Super Saturday is super early---7:15 sat. morn. and I'm at my desk.   Sounds
like all your events will be fun.  I'm counting on your helping me with my
parties, too!
Sounds like this week is busy, but I'm around next weekend.  We'll figure it
out this week.  No message yesterday, so I rescheduled it for late afternoon
today, can wait.

Later--Jeff

Alexandra Saler@EES
11/10/2000 01:20 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

this was the wierdest book I have ever read.  It was called The Story of O,
and it about this sex cult in Paris and it totally freaked me out.  I am glad
that it is over.  I started another one last night that is a little bit
lighter.  Three generations of Jewish women in the south kind of thing.  tell
me if yours is good.  I haven't read it.  I am going to the chronicle book
dinner on sunday and I am totally psyched.  if you want me to get any of the
books signed for you let me know.  Ted Coppel will be there with his new
book.  I am running out so leave me a message if you want it.  Have a great
weekend!  I am bummed you can't make next thursday, so we will have to plan
something fun soon.
ALI

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

Everything was ok, just busy.  Good book?  I just started "When the sons of
heaven meet the daughters of earth"  have you heard of it?  I'd absolutely
love to go the the Anne Frank thing, but I can't get back from the management
conference.  I'm on a panel (with Jeremy) early Friday a.m.

Alexandra Saler@EES
11/10/2000 08:16 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

they must make you sign a confidentiality agreement when you walk in the
door!  well, I guess I have no choice but to believe you, even though some
juicy details would be kind of fun!
Her piano was so bad they had to do it twice.  At least I got to finish a
book.

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

piano tuning?  nothing bad about last night--very tame.

Alexandra Saler@EES
11/09/2000 12:01 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

ok...so I do want the low-down on last night b/c I am sure there is a lot
that is inappropriate for email!  I will be out of the office all afternoon
so if you want to talk I'll be on my cell phone 256-5582.
Big....small....it is still the Enron Executive Committee and you should feel
extremely proud.  I am so happy for you!
I hope that you have a great lunch and that your speech went will this
morning.

ali

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

Great!  Sorry YOU weren't there...
I'm on my way out  for a lunch.  I'll call you later.   (I'm excited about
the exec committee, but it is a little big, so I told Skilling we should
rename it the exec villiage!)

Alexandra Saler@EES
11/09/2000 11:06 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

how was the dinner?  I heard that there are PLENTY of girls there!


I will be out of town.


Marianne:
In addition to my other comments on the Mid Market Power Form, I think you
should add a forward contract rep.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


The IF term should be Nov.1, 2000 - Feb. 28, 2001.  Sorry if I messed up on
the phone.

Thanks,

Susan

From: Stacy E Dickson on 10/04/2000 03:26 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Term of Bazor Contract

Susan,
On your voice mail you said that the Gas Daily term was October 2000 and the
Inside Ferc term was November 30, 2000 through February 28, 2001.  Should it
be Nov 1st instead?

	Susan W Pereira
	10/04/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Stevens_Hollister@eott.com @ ENRON
		 cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Term of Bazor Contract

Stevens-

I've called Stacy Dickson and provided the term changes for the confirmation.

Thanks,

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 10/04/2000 11:04:44 AM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc: Molly_Sample@eott.com, Dan_Cole@eott.com
Subject: Term of Bazor Contract

Susan,

As we discussed this morning, we would like to change the term of the above
contract to October through February 2001, with the year extension.  Also,
change the October pricing to the "Gas Daily".

Thank you for your patience.

Stevens


Purchased gas from COH and CPA (deals 157211 & 157213) and sold to EES 157210
for the 28-31st.


Summary of Davis/Alpert bill:

1.  Retro-active to June 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002, 6.5 cent/kWh cap
on the energy component for residential and small commercial customers (under
100 kW).  The Commission has the ability to extend through 2003.  The
Commission also has the ability to adjust the cap.
2.  Commission can use revenues from utility-owned assets, refunds from FERC
to offset the undercollections.  (In addition, a companion bill was passed
that provides $150 million of general fund money to offset undercollections.)
3.  Large commercial/industrial/agricultural customers have an opportunity to
"opt-in" to the 6.5 cent/kWh cap with an annual true-up.
4.  SDG&E will under a prudence review by the CPUC, which may be another
source of funds to offset the undercollection.

Specific classes subject to cap:

Schedule A, all acute care hospitals, all public and private k-12 schools,
all accounts on AL-TOU under 100 kW.

Mona L Petrochko
08/31/2000 09:46 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, West GA, Tim Belden@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Yang, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Greg Cordell, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Brian
Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES,
Ronald G Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: CA Leg Update

The Alpert/Davis Bill (AB 265) and AB 1154 were voted out of the assembly
last night.  Three bills are now joined together.  The Alpert/Davis Bill (AB
265), Ducheny Siting Bill (AB 970) and AB 1154, which provides $150 million
of money from the general fund to offset undercollections resulting from the
Alpert/Davis bill imposition of a rate cap.

AB 970 is being heard in the assembly as we speak.  It is expected to be
voted out.  Then all three bills will be sent to the Governor to be signed.

There were no revisions to the Alpert/Davis bill.

Green Mountain is working on a letter, that Alpert would sign, saying that
underrecoveries resulting from the rate cap will be recovered from customers
that benefitted from the rate cap and that DA customers will not be
disadvantaged.


Attached are the confirm documents for the PERC RFG transaction.  My
suggested revisions are redlined.

I did not revise the Enfolio document, but it needs to be changed from ENA to
Enron MW, L.L.C.

thanks,
Russell
(312) 541-1159


Matt Lenhart
   3208A
   3-7176
   Supervisor: Phillip Allen


Ben, I've got a pulled muscle (groin) that I've been trying to nurse for a
few months.  Went for a run this weekend and strained it.  I wonder if we
could either postpone tennis for a week or so?  If you prefer - I could -
but will have to take it fairly easy.  Let me know.  Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [SMTP:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
> Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 11:27 AM
> To:	Yeager, David
> Subject:	RE: Tennis?
>
> Tuesday sounds good.  Does around 6:00pm work for you?
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Yeager, David" <David.Yeager@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Friday, July  20, 2001 10:17 AM
>    To:     Rogers, Benjamin
>    Subject:  RE: Tennis?
>
>    Ben, good to hear from you.  How about Tuesday?  Monday would also
>    probably
>    work.  Let me know what is best for you.  Dave.
>
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From:      Rogers, Benjamin [SMTP:Benjamin.Rogers@ENRON.com]
>    > Sent:      Friday, July 20, 2001 9:29 AM
>    > To:   Yeager, David
>    > Subject:   Tennis?
>    >
>    > David:
>    > Wanted to see when you wanted to get together for a little tennis and
>    a
>    > couple of beers afterwards.  Next week is pretty open for me, except
>    > Wednesday.  This weekend is out because I am headed to Barton Creek
>    for
>    > a little golf weekend.  Hope all is going well and I'll talk to you
>    > soon.
>    > Ben
>
>
>    ******************************************************************
>    This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
>    Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
>    use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>    If you have received this email in error please notify the
>    sender.
>    ******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Dave

Give me a call on the weekend if you get a chance.  I talked to Shankman and
he talks about more groups going to Global than I thought.  Like to discuss.

Lavo

Home 713-61-6096
Cell 713-417-3074


Dear Daily Power Report Subscriber:

Attached is the most recent issue of Power Executive.

As an end-of-year bonus for all Daily Power Report readers, we've arranged
with the publisher of Power Executive to offer a final discount on their
market-leading publication-- $150 off the regular price of $649. However,
this offer ends on 1/5. If you contact us before that date you can subscribe
to Power Executive for only $499 per year!! This is the lowest rate Power
Executive has offered this year, and they tell us we will not see it again.

Special Bonus-- Also, if you subscribe before 1/5/01 the publisher will
forward to you a CD filled with all back issues of Power Executive from year
2000, absolutely free.

Again, this is a limited offer, contact us before 1/5/01. Have a great
holiday.

Check it out, and if you'd like to subscribe, just give us your name, email
and telephone number, hit "reply" and a subscription agent will contact you.
You can also find a subscription coupon on the back page of the newsletter.

Requires Acrobat Reader 3.1 or higher, available free at:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader

( ) YES, I WANT TO SUBSCRIBE TO POWER EXECUTIVE FOR ONLY $499/year. ($150 off
the regular price for subscription orders placed before January 5).

( ) I AM INTERESTED IN A CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTION TO POWER EXECUTIVE (Provide
telephone number)

NAME:

EMAIL*:

TELEPHONE:

( ) PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME SAMPLES IN THE FUTURE

 - Powerexec12.8.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Jaesoo
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Stevens, Adam; Huang, Alex; Dhar, Amitava; Grigorov, Anguel; Dupont, Anita; Lee, Bob; Supatgiat, Chonawee; Pernoud, Christopher; Koepke, Gwyn; Johnson, Heather A.; Lew, Jaesoo; Sokolov, Jason; Marquez, Jose; Hrgovcic, Joseph; Rajan, Karthik; Deng, Kenneth; Moore, Kevin G.; Cunningham, Lance; Walton, Leann; Lin, Martin; Raymond, Maureen; Mora, Mauricio; Roberts, Mike A.; Mujica, Mitra; Neale, Nelson; Sezgen, Osman; Issler, Paulo; Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni; Sud, Pravas; Mellacheruvu, Praveen; De, Rabi; Bharati, Rakesh; Kohli, Sandeep; Wooddy, Sarah; Kiatsupaibul, Seksan; Yaman, Sevil; Ganjoo, Shalesh; Green, Shane; Chopra, Shravan; Tamarchenko, Sofya; Vasudevan, Sriram; Bennett, Stephen; Tamarchenko, Tanya; Candella, Therese; Barkley, Tom; Halliburton, Tom; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Kaminski, Vince J; Narongwanich, Wichai; Smith, William; Lu, Zimin
Subject:	joke unfinished

Hi folks,

Here is the original version of the joke I tried to make at yesterday meeting.

I've never been much of a Handy Man. I decided to order the new Time
Life series of Do-It-Yourself books. The first book was titled, "How to Fix
the Garbage Disposal." Though I followed all the instructions to the best of
my ability, and spent many long hours, I never did get the darn thing
repaired. Fortunately, the next book in the series was titled, "How to eat
with a HOOK!!!!"

Let's have a good day!

Jaesoo


Luiz. Thank you for your note.  We are still in the boxing ring!. The first
round was won but we still have some more rounds to go. Next week is the
consent, provably in two weeks we will discuss the regulatory obstacles..

Jose
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/07/2001 05:54 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
07/07/2001 03:41 PM
To: Cuiaba LT
cc: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cuiaba Issues - July 6 situation-

Topic I -- Amendment 4

We spent the morning perfecting Aditivo 4 with Furnas, to cover the situation
where the commissioning plan did not go as scheduled. It was signed early
afternoon and sent to Eletrobras.

The Eletrobras Diretoria had not followed this issue closely and need legal
clearance. Furnas and the Ministry (Perazzo) called to give it priority. Late
at night we received word that the "parecer" (opinion) was ready and that it
the Anex would  signed by Eletrobras next Monday and entered into their Board
meeting next Tuesday.

Petrobras sent us the letter we asked but took out of their version a key
word "only". "Only" refers that they will not go after us for non-payment if
Furnas does not pay. In the letter they also stated that they will commence
the loading operation -- at their own risk - Saturday. This was requested by
Perazzo to save logistical time because it takes three days to get to Cuiaba
from the refinery.

[Advised Laine of the situation to check Monday how many trucks were loaded
and  in transit]

We contacted Perazzo through Sergio Assad to get his word that there would
not be a last minute hitch; otherwise, we may have to refuse to take the
diesel and would create a BIG PR problem for all.

Topic III - Consent Package (Opinions, Aditivo, Consent)
Furnas came in with the list of issues they wanted to discuss. I instead
insisted that we treat this meeting as a continuation of the MME meeting and
follow the Agenda  by looking at the Consent document package -- actually go
over the text -  that they find objectionable, and,  if it the text had a
direct link with any of their issues, we would discuss and examine the
relative positions.

What they told me is what they have told me before, that some of the issues
have nothing to do with the Consent but they want it as a condition to agree
to the package. Which is fine to me, because it will make it clear to the
government what we have been saying --- they want to change the deal. In
Furnas' defense, I need to add that they feel they have been handed a bad
contract  and they want regulatory relief, which it has been granted, on a
case-by-case basis, in other deals. So part of their strategy is to force
MME, or Aneel to provide some tariff relief.

I asked them to list out  the key issues with the Consent-  Old-- a) the 90
days additional time (Furnas), b) The guarantee substitution at the time of
privatization, c) the lenders involvement on contract changes "we do not want
to go to Washington to negotiate" - Newer - d) giving up their right to ask
Aneel to "homologar", ratify; rather than "registrar" contract changes [big
risk for us] . I believe the have more direct issues.

We go back to Rio Monday (another holiday down the drain) ..and Tuesday to
complete the list -- Topic II -- Regulatory conflicts

Jose


Fran and Tricia... this note is to confirm that I will be an employee of ENA
effective Dec. 1/ 00.  Fran, are you looking after payroll issues or is it
going to be Jeannie Sloan

Thanks. BT


Can we also get something in the stip that limits the market making activity
or at least promises a reexamination of the scope of the market making
activity after some period of time.  Also, can we strengthen the language to
give us something beyond simply a right to file  -- which is a right we have
anyway.

	James D Steffes
	03/16/2001 03:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: PJM Stip

Attached is the proposed Stip to allow PJM to move forward as an RTO.

In the Stip, we argue that PJM should be approved by FERC but condition our
acceptance on a FERC process to unify the Northeast markets.

My only comment is to delete the final WHEREAS paragraph on congestion
management.

While our ability to later stop PJM from being an RTO is limited, I believe
that this gives us the ability to drive a consolidation of the Northeast
markets - which is one of the goals of the East Power desk.

In addition, I think that the overall direction of PJM in commercializing its
software is a good activity for our interest - even if we don't want
everything in their package.

Sarah is out until Monday when we need to get back with PJM.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 03:24 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	03/16/2001 11:33 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: PJM Stip

Here's Craig's address:

glazec@pjm.com,


Word on the street is that the CA ISO staff is NOT asking for a vote on price
caps at the Board meeting on Thursday.  (I was speculating that the Board
would be asked to lower the price caps to $100 or to adopt the CEO's
proposal, which he filed at FERC on 10/20.)  The vote will be put off a vote
until late November.  No reason given -- but presumably so they don't look
like idiots if FERC comes out with something radically different on November
1.

But, I have also heard that one Board member -- Mike Florio of TURN -- has
asked for a vote on his proposal -- load-differentiated price caps (e. g.$250
when area load is 40,000 MW or more, $150 when load is between 30,000 and
40,000, etc.) If a few Board members, i.e., the utilities and some of the
munis gang up, they can force a vote.  I'm expecting one, but given the
staff's/CEO position, there may not be sufficient votes to go lower until
FERC comes out with its proposal.

Maybe small miracles can happen in California ...


For the last two nights, the hourly desk night crew was unable to view/print the scheduling activity report (SAR) for the northeast hourly book.  This report provides detail as to whether or not the book is flat net megawatts for the day.  We were able to view and print the SAR report for the remaining hourly books (ERCOT, southeast, midwest).

Why is this problem persisting?  Please investigate this to rectify this situation.  Thanks.


I just got a call from a dealmaker who is going to lunch today with a group of business people in from Russia and wants to get a Confidentiality Agreement in place before the meeting.  We have never looked at Russian law before, have you?  If you have, can you direct me as to whether Confidentiality Agreements are enforceable in Russian courts, should we include our standard arbitration provision and would such provision be enforceable, would we be better off getting the customer to submit to the jurisdiction of the NY courts, and lastly are there any other provisions we should be putting in the agreement.

Is there anyone there that can give me some quick help?  Attached is our standard form of NDA...Thanks!


The first two are in. Deal numbers are 476581 and 476582.

476285 is no good. It's been killed.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/07/2000 01:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: check out

APB

missing 2 deals:

buy mieco
11-31
25 mw
465.00
palo

sell mieco
11-31
25 mw
475.00
SP-15

NATSOURCE

476285, broker says this deal is no good.

thanks


SuperBowl.com joins with Miller Lite to offer you an
exciting new way to enjoy fantasy football. The
SuperBowl.com Playoff Challenge is now on-line and ready
for you to sign up. The Playoff Challenge, powered by
SportsLine.com, is FREE to play.

http://fantasy.superbowl.com/?r=essb1211

Starting the week prior to the NFL's Wild Card games
(Dec. 30-31), you will be able to assemble your own fantasy
playoff team of NFL players. Prizes will be awarded to high
scorers each week and to overall top scorers after the
Super Bowl.

Although the SuperBowl.com Playoff Challenge officially
kicks off with the start of the NFL playoffs, the site
gives you plenty of statistics and scouting reports right
now. So sign up today to get a headstart on scouting the
players you think will score the most fantasy points this
postseason.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation.
If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please respond to
remove@commissioner.com.  Do not respond to this email directly.

This message was sent to: tkuyken@enron.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


FYI -looks like everything is fine.  sorry for the mix up.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Irma
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Sultanik, Dinah; Dobbs, Karla
Cc:	Barnard, Marla; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	FW: Melissa Videtto - Active employee

Dinah or Karla,

We have been experiencing some call volume on active employee's who are receiving term packet information from Hewitt, but are still active in the system.  Do you know why that is?

Please advise.

Thanks.
Irma Alvarez
HR Svc Connection
Ext. 3-1543

P.S. Phillip - I show Melissa active in SAP with no future term action out there.  Thxs, Irma

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:08 PM
To:	HR Service Connection
Cc:	Alvarez, Irma
Subject:	Melissa Videtto

Melissa Videtto received a termination package over the weekend and should not have.  Can you please confirm she has not been terminated so I can send an email confirmation to her manager and herself?  thanks

Marla Barnard
Vice President - Human Resources
Enron Net Works and Enron Broadband Services
713-345-8158
Cell:  713-898-3083


Roel summarized some articles on HFD from Houston Chronicle. See attached.


John -

I left a message about this last week, but wanted to follow-up with
additional information for your review.  We have three offerings currently
available (or coming soon) that I feel would compliment the small/mid cap
and fixed income exposure you already have through Redwood, Sequoia, and
Willow.

Quantitative Allocation, LLC: Integrates four quantitative investment models
to drive aggressive (and potentially leveraged) asset allocation decisions.
Generates exposure to stock and bond markets through indexing techniques and
futures transactions.  Portfolio market exposures can range from +325% to
-175% of net assets.  This is clearly different from the largely
non-leveraged stock-picker funds you already own.  I would consider this to
be a predominately large-cap investment (I think of it as an index fund with
a brain and on steroids - call me and I'll explain that comment in more
detail).

Juniper Crossover Fund, LLC: Managed by OrbiMed Advisors, and focused on
global biotech and pharma.  Up to 30% participation in private equity.  This
could be a way to get you some private equity exposure with a world-class
manager.

Tamarack International Fund, LLC: Long/short stock-picker fund focused on
the international mid-cap market.  I feel this fund is very similar in style
to the managers you already own, but would give you exposure to the
international markets that you currently lack.  This is a new fund and the
first closing will probably be in June.

Of course, the summaries above are for information purposes only and do not
constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy interests in
these funds.  Please call me if you're interested in any of the strategies
outlined above, and I'll have the appropriate offering memorandum sent to
you.

Thanks,
> Michael Gapinski
> Account Vice President
> Emery Financial Group
> PaineWebber, Inc.
> 713-654-0365
> 800-553-3119 x365
> Fax: 713-654-1281
> Cell: 281-435-0295
>

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


In the european csfb prepay which was just extended, morgan stanley was also involved for a related swap of the same amount. I think csfb was aware of that on the euro prepay. Has it been mentioned yet? Treasa knows the details.

I wonder if RBS is another institution which could move quickly. They have capacity now.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Tom neglected to put the broker in on this deal. It's number 463045.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   11/20/2000 02:43 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing-Alonso Deal

Hello
I am missing a Tom Alonso Deal

Bloomberg bro confirm
11/20/00
Enron Buys IdahoPower Co
Palo Verde
Dec2000
25mws
125.00
on peak

Thanks


and some oil


got it

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:04 PM
To: Vickers, Frank
Subject: Test


Yeah I will play.  Who else is playing?


where is she going?

Brian Hoskins
01/27/2000 01:44 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bye

Fonny invitate you to party tonite.  Bring foto-kamera.  Nice, nude models.

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000 01:43
PM ---------------------------

Fonny Bunjamin
01/27/2000 01:37 PM
To: Erin Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chetan Paipanandiker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christiaan
Huizer, Gustavo Junqueira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Rainer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Epstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jebong Lee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Schube/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Hsu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanton Ray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Segura/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Van Roten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan Deane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth McCarthy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Janna, Eric Tipp/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jun
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Adam Borgatti, Dan Feather/HOU/EES@EES, David
Hunker/Corp/Enron@ECT, Douglas V Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Xi
Xi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Javier Espinoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Jachimiak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jebong Lee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue
Edison/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Will Chen, Ted
Huang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shen Hong, Victor
Ong/Corp/Enron@Enron, Miguel Vasquez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bye

Hi guys,

It's time for me to move.  If anyone is up to it, let's have the last drink
at State Bar at around 7.30 or 8.
See you there.

FB


--

>>>> subscribe ba278-1
Succeeded.


>From: "stanley czajkowski" <sjplus5@hotmail.com>
>To: BJLord2@aol.com, cahemming@hotmail.com, cardiac734@aol.com,
>cardiactech@adelphia.net, CertifiableX2@aol.com, cmarsh3892@aol.com,
>comet91000@worldnet.att.net, cwalker@borg.com, dianehalpin@AOL.COM,
>dwestwood@erols.com, emsequalnolife@aol.com, found1@earthlink.net,
>Gary_Butt@dom.com, haasdc@borg.com, haasmb@netscape.net,
>jons_stang@yahoo.com, jwalsh@medicorpihn.com, katwilliams@juno.com,
>kesterl@hoffman.army.mil, kidd108@attbi.com, ladybee108@webtv.net,
>Larry.Gordon@usmc-mccs.org, maniac_8@hotmail.com, okfine66@aol.com,
>pd4byot@aol.com, pita651@aol.com, ralph.walters@gsa.gov,
>rdavies@twcny.rr.com, s-t-a-k@msn.com, shedrick@erols.com,
>tabrams@gargerassoc.com, tina_leavy@msn.com, welsh@ibb.gov,
>Wollimat1@cs.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Emergency Friendship System
>Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:05:30 -0500
>
>
>
>
>>From: Dave & Candy Haas <haasdc@borg.com>
>>To: Directk2@aol.com,anne.wright@dfas.mil,beth.evans@dfas.mil,
>>haasmb@netscape.net,van002@adelphia.net,dhaas001@twcny.rr.com,
>>okfine66@aol.com,PAWZNMS@aol.com,laniecushman@yahoo.com,
>>cryan@dreamscape.com,dunningjm@americu.net,SandyAndy42@aol.com,
>>sjplus5@hotmail.com
>>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Emergency Friendship System
>>Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:53:11 -0800
>>
>>
>>>>This is a test of the Emergency Friendship System
>>>>forward it (and to me too I hope)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>....... A Friend....
>>>>(A)ccepts you as you are
>>>>(B)elieves in "you"
>>>>(C)alls you just to say "HI"
>>>>(D)oesn't give up ! ! on you
>>>>
>>>>(E)nvisions the whole of you (even the unfinished parts)
>>>>(F)orgives your mistakes
>>>>(G)ives unconditionally
>>>>(H)elps you
>>>>(I)nvites you over
>>>>
>>>>(J)ust "be" with you
>>>>(K)eeps you close at heart
>>>>(L)oves you for who you are
>>>>(M)akes a difference in your life
>>>>
>>>>(N)ever Judges
>>>>(O)ffer support
>>>>(P)icks you up
>>>>(Q)uiets your fears
>>>>(R)aises your spirits
>>>>
>>>>(S)ays nice things about you
>>>>(T)ells you the truth when you need to hear it
>>>>(U)nderstands you
>>>>(V)alues you
>>>>
>>>>(W)alks beside you
>>>>(X)-plains thing you don't understand
>>>>(Y)ells when you won't listen and
>>>>(Z)aps you back to reality
>>>>&
>>>>OK THIS IS A TEST !!!!
>>>>PASS IT ON TO EVERYONE YOU CONSIDER A FRIEND
>>>>OR WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AS A FRIEND
>>>>SEE HOW MANY TIMES YOU GET IT BACK!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>Dave & Candy Haas
>>E-Mail: haasdc@borg.com
>>(315) 736-0366
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
>http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


Has this been signed and sent to Microsoft?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Bolender, Corinna
Cc: Jones, Tana
Subject: Re: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Corinna -

I have looked at the attached.  It is fine.  I will be printing two originals
for Net Works' signature.  I'll have them sent down for signature so that
they can then be sent to Microsoft.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate 05/31/2001 05:26 PM 	   To: Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc: Charles Brewer/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Opalko/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Ogg/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate,
jammo@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate, schang@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
rpierce@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate  Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1
JDP MOU

Mark,

Can you please review the changes made by Susan Chang at Microsoft to the SQL
2000 SP1 JDP MOU for our Unify application.  Bob Ward is out of the office
until June 4th, and this application is going into production on June 11th.
We need to ensure the MOU is finalized and signed prior to going into
production so that we can receive the appropriate support from Microsoft when
we go live.

If you need to contact Susan her telephone number is 425-703-6394.  Her email
is schang@microsoft.com.

Thanks for your immediate attention to this matter,
Corinna Bolender
Desk: 713-345-4388
Cell:   512-632-4285

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "James Morris" <jammo@microsoft.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22James+20Morris+22+20+3Cjammo+40microsoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Corinna Bolender; Bolender, Corinna; Ward, Bob
Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Bob and Corinna,
Here are the versions of the MOU your lawyer will need to review.  As
expected, some of the items just did not make the bar to warrant a
change.  Specifically:
an actual date for the released product will not go on the MOU.
Customers who particpate in the JDP have a high degree of touch and
disclosure with MS.  Although we are glad to discuss dates and they draw
near with the customer we do not promise anything from the beginning
(though this hardly matters now considering the date).
The line in #4 that was cut and pasted to #17 has been placed back in
#4.  This is due to the placement of the topic in #4.  The rest of #17,
specifically stating that there is NO COST TO THE CUSTOMER has been left
in on #17, and I'll probably incorporate this for future use.  It is a
good addition.
#10 on Microsoft's section has been removed.  It is clearly rednundant
and not necessary.  We already say there is absolutely no cost to the
customer.

If this is agreeable (I have included the red lined version, so your
lawyers can review), the final version with those changes have also been
included.  Please print, sign and return.

Thanks!
JamMo!

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Chang (LCA)
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:06 PM
To: James Morris
Cc: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: REVISED: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

James - per our phone call this afternoon, I've revised the MOU.
Attached is the redlined version as well as the final doc.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.

Susan

-----Original Message-----
From: James Morris
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: FW: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Susan,
I would like to permanently modify our MOU to the following for our
Joint Development Programs.  It is redlined, so you can review the exact
changes.  This is actually from the customer, but I like what they
changed and added, I just want to be certain that it's not going to come
back and bite me later.  Roughly 4 or 5 sentenced.
Thanks for you help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Bob [mailto:Bob.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 8:49 AM
To: James Morris
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Hi, James.  I've attached a copy of the MOU which contains some minor
changes suggested by one of our attorneys.  Let me know what you think.
Thank you.

 <<JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc>>

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

 - JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc << File: JDP MOU
02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc >>
 - SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc << File: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc >>


Several of the Enron Corp. Research Team would like for you to come
in for an interview.  They are:

Vince Kaminski    Managing Director
Stinson Gibner    Vice President
Maureen Raymond-Castaneda  Director

Please give me some dates and times of your availability during the rest
of January and I will try to coordinate them with our schedule.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Adminsitrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713/852-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Market Participants:

Attached you will find the preliminary finding regarding the May 22nd Stage
2 System Emergency.

Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations

Sent on behalf of Don Fuller by Alice Leonard

Alice Leonard
Client Relations
(916) 608-7059
aleonard@caiso.com

 <<Emergency MM2.doc>>

 - Emergency MM2.doc


===============ALLFREENEWS===============

Win a Pentium 4, 1.0 + GHz (1000 MHz) powerhouse!

- 1.0 + GHz (1000 MHz) Pentium 4 Processor!
- New monitor!
- DVD-ROM drive and 3.5 inch floppy drive!
- Microsoft
 Windows
 Millennium Edition!
- DVD Drive for movies!
- Loads of extra software included!

Don't wait, enter to win today! Enter more than
once to increase your odds of winning!

Click Here Now:
http://r1.postlite.com/?u=87&l=20&id=2542233

 AOL Users Click Here

Thanks,
AllFreeNews.com
http://www.allfreenews.com

->>-------------------------------------------------------------<<-
TO UNSUBSCRIBE click here:

http://www.postlite.com/u/?l=allfreenews&e=alewis@ect.enron.com

AOL users click here to unsubscribe

or...

Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject.

This email was sent to: alewis@ect.enron.com

X-Postlite-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com
X-Postlite-Userid: allfreenews
->>-------------------------------------------------------------<<-


Tickets requisitioned for England/Germany.  $1500!!!!!!


Start Date: 1/18/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


ok....you name the spot
........actually, let me pick.

       Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:30 PM
To: chris@sheckys.com
Subject: RE: duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude...........what's up?

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuude,

I'll be in NY all week next week.  Lets get together and have some
cocktails at the very least.......Jeff

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "choffman" <chris@sheckys.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22choffman+22+20+3Cchris+40sheckys+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRO
N.com]

   Sent:   Friday, March 23, 2001 5:40 PM
   To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
   Subject:  RE: duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude...........what's up?

   Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I was out almost all day. I hope dinner
   with
   Saar was fun, he never changes. We should definitely get together when
   you
   come to NYC. My tel # is 212.732.2277.
   Cell # is 1.917.806.0571. Speak to you soon, and by the way I hear that
   you
   are the King....Enron up 8% today.

                  Chris

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 7:47 AM
   To: chris@sheckys.com
   Subject: RE: duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude...........what's up?

   You are the king.  I'm in London this week, and am having dinner with
   Saar
   tonight.  He also mentioned you got engaged--congrats!  I'll be in the
   office in houston next week, and am coming to NY the week of April
   8---let's have dinner.  What's a phone number to reach you?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "choffman" <chris@sheckys.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22choffman+22+20+3Cchris+40sheckys+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRO
   N.com]

      Sent:   21 March 2001 22:34
      To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
      Subject:  duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude...........what's up?

      Long time no speak........how are things? Check out our
      site........www.sheckys.com


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: opec.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - opec.pdf


Hello everyone.

 You will be receiving a report that contains a list of all of your direct
reports via inter company mail.  Please take a moment to review your list to
ensure that we have included everyone for PRC purposes.  In the event that
you need to make changes, please do so on the report itself and return it to
my assistant, Ramona Perkins at EB 3659B, by May 30, 2001.  You may also
contact Ramona directly at ext. 5-8165 to make any updates via telephone.  If
you do choose to call her, please go ahead and forward your updated report
back to her.

 Thank you.

Kathy Mosley
HR Manager


Please remind me of this class.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2001 04:54
PM ---------------------------

Ernie
02/28/2001 07:04 AM
Sent by: Ernie
To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Development Center Class Reminder  - Harassment Avoidance

You are scheduled to attend:

Harassment Avoidance
Class Days and Times:
  3/5/2001  02:45:00 PM - 04:15:00 PM
Room # & Location: DoubleTree-La Salle B,  Houston
Participant Fee: $ 50
Note:

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  March 5, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 50 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 02:45:00 PM on March 5, 2001.  Please call
the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Weekly Priority Mtg./Raetta

Date:		12/20/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Please see the attached articles:

  (Ken Lay quoted)


Sunday morning we will experience the first time zone change of the year.
The time change is shown below (note NO HE 3 PST).  This means that we will
now be on the same time as El Paso.  Cheers.


Shankman told me tonight that the additional piece that makes up the difference between the 3.2 and the 4.4 has not been irreversibly committed to, so we don't have to pay.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donovan, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:56 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	FW: Art Committee

Steve - FYI

Bridget's spreadsheet shows $3.2 million paid.  At an August "Art Committee" meeting, Lea indicated $4.4 million committed to date, i.e. may be some large invoices outstanding.

I'm working with Jeff Shankman to contain.   - Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maronge, Bridget
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:55 AM
To:	Donovan, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Art Committee

Per my conversation with Bill this morning, please find attached the list of art purchases and expenses:

The following invoices are outstanding and need to be processed for payment:

Sarah Balinskas - $2,441.04 (Art)
Lea Fastow - $8.00 (Parking)
Atelier4 - $1,328.00 (Transportation of art work)

Bill, the invoice I mentioned for $72,000 had been paid.

 << File: ART COMMITTEE EXPENSES.xls >>

Bridget Maronge
Tel: 713-853-3585
Fax: 713-646-2300
bridget.maronge@enron.com


In the first paragraph, my reference to "Enron Comercializadora ..."  SHOULD
READ "Enron Comercializadora de Energia Argentina S.A."


The fix for remedy ticket ETS200000031431 has been migrated to model office and is ready for testing. The Nom volumes were doubled for contracts that Nomed in cycle 0 and cycle 1.


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 06:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           11/30/2000 04:40 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Austin/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tri-C/Cokinos Gov Bill Daniels Dec. Pricing

Julie,

Please correct the pricing for Sitara Ticket #377169 for the month of Dec.
from 97% IF/HSC to 97% Gas Daily, per Jeff's message below.

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

Jeff A Austin@EES
11/28/2000 02:38 PM
To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tri-C/Cokinos Gov Bill Daniels Dec. Pricing

Melissa,

Cokinos has elected to be paid Gas Daily for the month of December.  Please
let Jill know if there are any questions.

Thanks,

Jeff


Hi Johnny,
This email should serve as notification of Peter Keavey's response to your requisition number 109781.  This candidate has been tracked to your requisition no. 109781 and their resume/posting may be viewed in Personic.

Iracema Hernandez
Resume Transaction Center
713-853-0677
ihernan3@enron.com


Here is the revised expense report.

Thanks,
Kathy


more from amanda
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Amanda K Martin@AZURIX on 12/18/2000 02:56 PM
Sent by: Susan Kalich@AZURIX
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resumes - Thierry Noel & Tameeza Asaria

Attached resumes are as per our talks and my voice mail.  Thanks -

 Amanda/sak


Hugo, you can go ahead and remove me from the distribution list as I have
moved out of the controls group.  Good luck with everything, it has been
great working with you.


yeah.  didn't you get it already?


As of this week EnronOnline has just started offering US/Canadian Dollar
Swaps Online.  As part of my review in determining whether a counterparty can
transact these products online I look at the Financial Trading Agreement
Database to see if there are any restrictions indicated, check the master
swap agreement, and I am also looking at any Board Resolutions we might have
received when we got the master agreement executed.

What I am finding is that in the old days when we asked for resolutions
evidencing the authority to enter into the master agreement/derivative
transactions frequently the resolutions do not allow the counterparies to
enter into currency transactions.  Since transacting these currency
transactions with our energy customers is a new area of business for us I
just wanted us all to be mindful to check these old resolutions and not to
rely solely on the "Restrictions" contained in Lotus Notes.


Yes - as I understand it, Stephanie and Tana will be out that week but
Samantha and Susan will be here.

	Taffy Milligan
	10/25/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: REVISED-YEAR END CALENDAR

HAVE YOU APPROVED THIS REQUEST?
----- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:46 AM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	10/25/2000 08:22 AM

		 To: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: REVISED-YEAR END CALENDAR

Taffy -
I will be out Nov. 21, 22 and 23.

Stephanie

Taffy Milligan@ECT
10/24/2000 03:00 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: REVISED-YEAR END CALENDAR

WHOOPS!

Please advise, at your earliest convenience, of tentative or confirmed plans
for vacation during the holiday season, Nov & Dec.

taffy


Good Day,

You may be aware that the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
(TNRCC)
has developed a Mass NOx Emissions Trading program for the Houston-Galveston
nonattainment area (HGA) to fulfill its requirements in meeting EPA,s air
quality standards.  Targeted sources are those that emit 10 tons per year or
more in the HGA.   Though this program will be tailored to meet the region,s
needs it will likely share characteristics of other Cap and Trade emissions
trading programs such as the Title IV SO2 acid rain program, the OTC NOx
program, and the RECLAIM program.

At the request of a number of HGA proposed program participants, Cantor
Fitzgerald is conducting a short survey of participants in the Mass Emissions
Trading Program.  In exchange for your completion of this survey we will
provide you with its findings.  Results will be tabulated, aggregated, and
included in a NOx TRADING PROGRAM MARKET STUDY, which Cantor Fitzgerald
intends to present to participants at an interactive seminar (date yet to be
established).  We will notify participants by fax when a date has been chosen.

ALL SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT YOU PROVIDE WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
PLEASE FAX BACK YOUR COMPLETED SURVEY TO 415-296-9582 NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY
9, 2001.

We believe the information we gather will be beneficial to both potential
buyers and sellers of HGA NOx Emission Allowances, and we encourage you to
take part.

If you have any questions please call 1-800-228-2955 and speak to Laurie Gage
on ext 11.
We welcome any extra input you may wish to provide.

Thank you,

Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage Services  800.228.2955

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you would prefer not to receive further messages:
1. Click on the Reply button.
2. Replace the Subject field with the word remove.
3. Click the Send button.
You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal.

 - HGASurvey.pdf


The revised draft is attached, revised per Kay's and your comments.  I have
not re-run a redline, since the differences between the versions were minor
and essentially spelled out in Kay's and your email.

To whom should I send it (noting of course per your comment in the cover
letter that we may be adding language regarding an MEH-owned account for
receiving Hub Shipper payments)?

Thanks!  DT

 - #1127382 v15 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc


Thought you might be interested in this if you haven't already seen
it.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/02/14/S
P146907.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
February 14, 2001 (SF Chronicle)
Quokka Trying To Stay Afloat
Tommy Cummings

MUCH LIKE the global yachting races that it tracks, Quokka Sports
was sailing smoothly, successfully negotiating the choppy Internet seas.
Then, along came that squall known as the dot-com shakeout. It caused the
outlook to seem less than shipshape for the San Francisco company that has
a stake in the digital presentation of many premier sporting events.
Quokka Sports remains afloat, but it's taking on water big-time. The four-
year-old public company has started bailing -- it downsized 59 percent of
its 369-person staff on Monday -- and has altered its course to focus on
live- event coverage, its strength, and to be a service for clients in
need of multimedia content.
"What we've done is changed strategy to be able to compete effectively in
this marketplace," said Alvaro Saralegui, Quokka president and chief
executive officer.
The focus on live events is in place -- Quokka has launched official sites
for the NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments and the 2002
Olympics and also plans to apply its unique online presentation to the PGA
and Major League Baseball.
But to offset declining ad revenue, Quokka Sports also announced this week
that it plans to spin off its technology division as a business unit that
would provide clients with multimedia needs.
Although Saralegui declined to name prospective clients, he said ventures
would be similar to Quokka's project with General Motors for last year's
24 Hours of LeMans. GM paid Quokka to use its style -- text, images,
video, metrics, etc. -- to track GM-sponsored cars in the race.
"We know what it's going to cost us to do it; we charge that plus a margin
and after that, it's off to the races, so to speak," Saralegui said.
Maybe. It probably will take a lot of those projects for Quokka to see
some financial light.
In its quarterly earnings announcement last week, Quokka warned that its
own auditors might question the company's viability. Some financial
analysts who follow Quokka have abandoned it, perhaps because its stock
value has sunk to penny status.
Those factors could make the NCAA and the International Olympic Committee
begin to question Quokka's sea legs -- though they haven't publicly.
However, NBC Sports -- which has a financial stake in Quokka -- wondered
what was happening, especially with the layoffs and restructuring report,
Saralegui said.
Quokka has had some "discussions (with NBC)," Saralegui said, "but that's
in the spirit of our relationship we've had all along."
All of this seems a far cry from Quokka's beginnings when it offered deep
coverage of global sailing and mountain climbing. Quokka applied the style
to mainstream sports, including wiring Michael Johnson to track his heart
rate and other vital statistics online during two of Johnson's pre-Olympic
meets.
"They've done some real innovative programming," said Patrick Keane, an
analyst with Jupiter Communications. "They just built a broadband business
before there was a broadband audience."
Quokka's struggles have come at an inopportune time. The NCAA basketball
tournaments are less than a month away, the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics
are less than a year off and sports -- such as baseball, professional golf
and Euro-style motor sports -- to which Quokka has committed to giving its
best digital presentation are beginning.
Meanwhile, Keane said he's not optimistic that Quokka can weather the
storm.
"Right now, they're tacking," Keane said, using another sailing term.
"Every direction they tack in, there's more blood in the water. I'm just
not convinced that they're going to be able to get through it."
BYTES: ESPN Internet Ventures is offering the NFL $50 million in cash over
five years to remain producer of NFL.com, Bloomberg News reported
yesterday. EIV's offer is more than triple the amount of cash it paid to
secure the NFL's Internet rights under a three-year agreement that expires
in April. . . . The smartest link of the week belongs to ESPN.com, which
notified its users on its opening page of the Anna Kournikova e-mail virus
on Monday. The e-mail promised images of tennis star. Once the attachment
is opened, new messages containing the virus are spawned and sent to
e-mail addresses listed in Microsoft Outlook. The harm is the Anna virus
has the capacity to overload e- mail servers. Considering Kournikova is
the most-searched female athlete online, according to Palo Alto-based
AltaVista, ESPN.com probably saved some servers.
E-mail Tommy Cummings at cummings@sfchronicle.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 SF Chronicle


I know that you were in the Rio office during the latter part of last week.
I sent you an e-mail last week to see how you were doing with the
research/memo.  I also called Marcelo Rodrigues and left a message.  I have
not heard from either you or Marcelo and I am anxious to continue our
dialogue.  Please e-mail or call at your earliest convenience.  Thanks.  Sara


ABX1 Implementation:  Items H-23, H-24, and H-25 were held to the April 19,
2001 regularly scheduled meeting.  These items deal with funding issues to
allow the Department of Water Resources to continue with its
commodity-purchasing directives and regarding flow of funds from the
utilties. Items 4 and 4a address derivation of the California Procurement
Adjustment.  Item 4, provisions of which were passed at the March 27, 2001
business meeting, was unanimously approved.  This item adopts a mthod to
calculate the CA Procurement Adjustment. We will have a summery of this order
later today.

 Utility Holding Company Investigation:  The Commission voted 4-0 to
institute an investigation into the business practices of the utilities,
holding companies.  Commissioner Duque read a prepared statement by
Commissioner Bilas expressing his concerns regarding the intent of the OII,
whether it be investigative or punitive.  Commissioner Bilas requested that
the Scoping Memo yet to be issued address other relevant issues such as ring
fencing structures approved by FERC and the capital structure of the utility
companies.

 Interruptible Programs:  Commissioner Wood,s draft decision implementing 4
interruptible programs (agenda item 6) was approved on a 4-0 vote.  This
decision implements 4 programs designed to provide incentives to ratepayers
to manage their load including air conditioner cycling, voluntary load
reduction on the entire circuit, pay for load reduction incentives, and
discounts to customers who can reduce load on very short notice.

 Utility Solvency:  Items regarding issuance of bonds and other financing
items for the utiltities continue to be held

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Anything for the grocery list, my sweetie pie?


I'm still looking for that list of approved European countries for online
trading.  Any word...?


Kevin,

Thanks for your concern.

Vince

Kevin G Moore
01/29/2000 02:35 PM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Saturday

On Saturday I came to work and did some things that I needed to do.
Also, there were some things  left undone that  I felt I should do.

Mainly the conference room - We will schedule all birthday's and meetings in
the large conference room therefore , I made the room look more spacious.

Also on Monday - we need to check with the painters too see if they are going
to repair our walls.

We also need to get the additional pictures from the cage and get
them placed on the wall whereby the move can be completed.

If either of you have any questions or know of more things to do please
let's get together and discuss.

                                                                Thanks
                                                           Kevin Moore


Due to the larger than normal volume of activity, the report is being
distributed earlier this month.  The goal here is to give everyone more time
to move deals and contracts on those records scheduled for inactivation on
03/01/01.    You have received notification on the name changes as they have
occurred.

Please find attached the Name Change/Merger Notification Report for February
15.  To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select Enable
Macros and Read Only.
Please note that:
 ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
 Inactivations will be made on Mar 1

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.

As always, please contact me at x33103 with any questions or concerns.


To: Kate.Symes@enron.com
From: Anna Symes

I thought you might be interested in this job.  It's just one of the
more than 250,000 great jobs on Headhunter.net:

  http://www.headhunter.net/share/det.asp?d=J26K66D0YJBB4DWPWJ

Comments:


This is the latest from Imelda.


George,

Happy to work for the greater good, but would welcome your help in nailing a
deal with Continental quickly, as my understanding is that they have been
unresponsive to date.

Thanks

Fernley

George Wasaff@ENRON
04/12/2000 16:05
To: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Colin Bailey/LON/ECT@ECT, Sam Kemp/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ramsey/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: British Airways vs Continental

Fernley:

We have a number of key initiatives in process with Continental including
sales of broadband services, weather derivatives and facility management that
have the potential to exceed the savings being offered by British Airways.  I
would prefer that we stay the course with Continental plus I am confident
that Continental can either meet or exceed BA's current offer.

George Wasaff

	Fernley Dyson@ECT
	11/21/2000 06:32 AM

		 To: George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sam Kemp/LON/ECT@ECT, Colin Bailey/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: British Airways vs Continental

George,

Enron Europe has negotiated a preferred supplier agreement with British
Airways which will save us circa $3m a year vs Continental Airlines. I know
there are existing and potential links with Continental, so please let me
know if this causes you a problem. Colin Bailey is in Houston next week if
you need or want to know any of the detail.

Regards

Fernley


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 01:44
PM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com> on 01/10/2001 12:43:03 PM
To: Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com

Subject: Re: Master Sales

yes, I think this is part of it. Also, for that reason, Ron Jolle, attorney
for the City of Chicago attended the hearing today and indicated that the
City would intervene. One likely reason for the concern over potential
abuse is that, after a lengthy delay, I understand that the ICC has again
turned its attention to rules of conduct for gas utility affiliated
interests. They had started a proceeding to work rules, but there had been
no activity for many months. The ICC Staff has apparently been reviewing
rules of conduct in connection with resumed activity regarding the rules.
                                         At the hearing today, Jerry Fox
and Mary Klyshaff represented Peoples and North Shore. ICC was represented
by John Feeley and John RIeichart. Ron Jolle represented the City of
Chicago. David Gilbert is the Hearing Examiner. (He's a good examiner.)
There was no substantive discussion re issues. The schedule is: Feb.
28-Staff and Intervenor direct; March 28-Company rebuttal; Apr. 5-11:00am
status hearing (this was included in the schedule primarily to permit early
conclusion in the event that there are no issues raised or that the issues
are resolved);April 27- Staff/Intervenor  Rebuttal; May 11 Company
Surrebuttal; May 23 10:00am hearing.   If there are disputed issues, the
hearing would be followed by briefing, issuance of an Examiner's proposed
order and biriefs/replies on exceptions.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========