Iris,

I have received your E-mail and phone message.
I shall distribute your papers to the other interviewers.

Also, I shall contact you by Thursday regarding a job offer.

Vince

"iris mack" <irismmack@hotmail.com> on 12/11/2000 08:09:10 PM
To: irismmack@hotmail.com, zlu@enron.com, vshanbh@enron.com
cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: Documents from Iris Mack

Hi again,

     I don't recall if I mentioned that my Harvard Doctoral dissertation
involved another energy problem - the Transient Stability of Electrical
Power Systems.

     Much of the data, model and analysis was done with lots of
collaborative efforts with my advisors at Harvard and MIT and with the
Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) in Palo Alto.

Kind regards,
Iris Mack

>From: "iris mack" <irismmack@hotmail.com>
>To: zlu@enron.com, vshanbh@enron.com
>CC: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>Subject: Documents from Iris Mack
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:57:21
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Received: from 64.20.165.171 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun,
10 Dec 2000 16:57:21 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [64.20.165.171]
From: "iris mack" <irismmack@hotmail.com>
To: zlu@enron.com, vshanbh@enron.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Documents from Iris Mack
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:57:21
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
X-Stn-Info:

Dear Zimin and Vasant,
?
???? How are you?? Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedules to
tell me about the work you are doing at Enron.
?
???? This email is in reference to your requests for two documents I
forwarded to Dr. Kaminski:
????????? 1.? My London Business School Executive MBA thesis on weather
derivatives
????????? 2.? A document describing some work I did on real options applied
to the commodities industry.
?
???? You should be able to get a copy of these documents from Dr. Kaminski.?
If not, please let me know.
?
Kind regards,
Iris Mack


No, you can do power.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Law, Michael
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:30 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: Albchem Industries Ltd.

Marie,

Although not mentioned below as a commodity covered, this was put in place as a Power contract. I hope there has not been any confusion.

Yours

Michael Law

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Adams, Laurel; Allen, Kimberly; Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Susan; Bell, Jean; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Brewer, Julie; Brown, Angela Y.; Bryan, Linda S.; Campos, Anthony; Cason, Sharen; Cisneros, Celeste; Colbert, Marilyn; Conwell, Wendy; Cook, Mary; Curry, Ken; Diamond, Russell; Ebow, Amber; Ellstrom, Diane; Espinoza, Veronica; Fischer, Jason; Garcia, Jorge A. ; George, Fraisy; Gonzalez, Veronica; Guillen, Andrea R.; Hare, Bill D.; Heaney, Gordon; Hendry, Brent; Hundl, Kimberly; Hunter, Larry Joe; Johnson, Cheryl; Johnson, Rudwell; Jones, Tana; Koehler, Anne C.; Lambert, Karen; Landau, Georgi; Landry, Shemeika S.; Lebrocq, Wendi; Lees, Lisa; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Mendoza, Nidia; Moore, Jason; Moran, Tom; Mulvany, Patrick; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Nelson, Cheryl; Nelson, Gary; Ngo, Tracy; Ornelas, Bianca; Otto, Randy; Panus, Stephanie; Piwetz, Stephanie; Radous, Paul; Rajaram, Aparna; Reeves, Leslie; Reves, Brant; Richardson, Stacey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Rodriguez, Melissa; Rohauer, Tanya; Sacks, Edward; Sayre, Frank; Schott, Samuel; Seib, Dianne; Sever, Stephanie; Shackleton, Sara; Shivers, Lynn; Southard, Carrie; Tackett, Scott; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Theriot, Kim S.; Thomas, Sheri; Vanek, Darren; Whalen, Melinda; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Williams, Tiffany
Cc:	Law, Michael
Subject:	Albchem Industries Ltd.

We have received an executed financial Master Agreement.

Type of Contract:	Master Agreement (Industrial)

Effective Date:		August 2, 2001

Enron Entity:		Enron Canada Corp.

Counterparty:		Albchem Industries Ltd.

Transactions Covered:	Approved for natural gas and crude oil products.  Not approved for pulp and paper, weather, foreign 				exchange, steel, interest rate and currency or forward rate.

Confirming Entity:	Enron Canada Corp.

Governing Law:		Province of Alberta


Handouts only.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 12:08 PM
To:	Webb, Jay; Rub, Jenny; Beck, Sally; Zipper, Andy; Lavorato, John; Oxley, David; Bradford, William S.; Colwell, Wes; Buy, Rick; Port, David; Hall, Bob M
Cc:	Golden, Jeff; Muller, Mark S.; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	Big Pig

On Wednesday morning we will be commencing the Due Diligence process with another counterparty.  Andy Zipper has agreed to lead their team through the process.

The Schedule outline is based on initial overview discussions/presentations  and then more detailed discussion can occur in individual groups the outline is as follows:

It may be better to split up earlier but I leave all those decisions to Andy.

9:00		Introduction			John Lavorato & Louise Kitchen
9:45		Financial Overview		Wes Colwell
10:30		Risk Overview			Buy / Port
11:00		Credit				Bradford
11:30		Back Office			Beck/Hall
12:30		Systems (EnronOnline)		Jay Webb
1pm		 Mid/Back Office Systems	Jay Webb
1:30pm		Infrastructure			Jenny Rub
2:00pm		HR				Oxley

Please make yourselves available - the meetings will probably take place on 32.

Tammie - please organize lunch and refreshments etc.

Assume Big Pig will bring 8 people.

Thanks

Louise


Please plan to attend an Off-Site meeting next Wednesday, February 16th at
the Plaza Club, located at 910 Louisiana.  The meeting will take place in the
Solarium Room.

The tentative agenda is:
11:30 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - 5:00  Meeting
5:00 - 6:30 Cocktails

As mentioned in today's staff meeting, if you have issues or items that you
would like added to the agenda please forward those on. As well, please
submit your ideas for the Management Team Building event by Friday
afternoon.  For those of you who are afraid of what Brenda and I may come up
with on our own, you better submit some ideas.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953


Based on the information given to Kevin, the following files represent all counterparties that are valued in excess of $500,000.  The first file contains all companies with the most exposure to Enron.

Regards,
Jeff Miller


My e-mail will change on Friday to kam.keiser@UBSWEnergy.com


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
rogertan@swbell.net.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Return-path: <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
Delivery-receipt-to: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Disposition-notification-to: "Keavey, Peter F."
<Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Received: from mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta2-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net)
 by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLQ007EC6PXDN@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims-ms-daemon; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:42:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.ngigpi.com ([205.252.36.66]) by
mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLQ00BGU6ULOE@mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:44:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by mail.ngigpi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA20058 for
 <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:57:31 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw03p.corp.enron.com
[192.168.110.110])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08)
 with ESMTP id f9OJfQ320096 for <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Wed,
 24 Oct 2001 14:41:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified)
 by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1)
 with SMTP id <T56cb912f88c0a86e6e63c@corp.enron.com>; Wed,
 24 Oct 2001 14:41:17 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.41])
 by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
Wed,
 24 Oct 2001 14:41:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:40:29 -0500
From: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
To: "Dowjones1 (E-mail)" <dina.omeara@dowjones.com>,
 "Dowjones2 (E-mail)" <john.edmiston@dowjones.com>,
 "Gas Daily (E-mail)" <gas_daily@ftenergy.com>,
 "Iferc1 (E-mail)" <kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "Iferc2 (E-mail)" <liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "NGI (E-mail)" <prices@intelligencepress.com>
Message-id:
 <3891F8E98C93214B9E3E913CB7BF600220DBB4@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
 boundary="{C6D4CB9D-C29C-4CEF-AE8A-BA4C06EC7556}"
Content-description: Daily Price Sheet.xls
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Index: AcFcw731j8wAfw9dQcSCyt2kyxZG+w==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2001 19:41:14.0119 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[D7281170:01C15CC3]
X-UIDL: 3a93eab200002afc


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
10:04 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 09:47 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/23/01


Sharon
please forward to the gas controllers


Plain vanilla intervention is fine.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pharms, Melinda
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.; Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Miller, Stephanie; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	CIG's Raton Basin 2002 Expansion Project

Hello Paul and Mark.  FYI:  CIG proposes to construct and operate facilities necessary to transport additional volumes of approximately 55 MDth per day of natural gas out of the Raton Basin Area in Colorado and New Mexico.

The total cost of the project is $26,896,800  with a proposed rolled-in treatment for the expansion out of the Raton Basin Area.

Question - Do you all have any issues that you want us to address in regards to the expansion or will a plain vanilla intervention be fine?  The intervention is due Nov. 5th.

If you could get to me between now and the early part of next week, that would be great.

Melinda


Brenda,

 In response to your phone call,  our Master is for firm delivery only
and as such will not accommodate interruptible service.  If you wish to
put a Master in place, our credit department will need some information.
Our contact in credit is Veronica Espinoza @ 713-646-6002 or Jason
Williams @ (713) 345-3923.

Finally,  I will be happy to send our GISB with special provisions if
you so desire.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Hunter Shively
Jason Williams (trading)
Andy Lewis
Kevin Ruscitti
Tom Donohoe
Denver Plachy
Martin Cuilla
Geof Storey
Jim Simpson
Virawan Yawapongsiri
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pharms, Melinda
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; Concannon, Ruth; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Calcagno, Suzanne; Shively, Hunter S.; Gomez, Julie A.
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject:	Livelink Access

Hello everyone.  The goal of Regulatory Affairs is to have livelink up and running for your use by no later than late November or early December.  In order to make sure you all can get into livelink without a hitch, please submit to me the list of names from your desk that will be using livelink.  They will then have guest access.

Please submit to me the list as soon as possible.  By next Friday, November the 2nd would be wonderful.  By then, you will see or should, the livelink link in your gas fundamentals page.

Thanks,
Melinda


Have I told you how wonderful you are?  I actually the Gas Daily prices for
every day.  If you could just enter them in Column S I would be so gratefull.


Fyi in case you see him Tuesday am.  I told him the 175/175, texas gas/power.  Presto and Kitchen went to bat for him.  He asked about base - I told him I would write a $15K personal check.  I think he was impressed but he was under a six-pack and wanted make a sober decision.


I spoke with Bear Stearns this morning and all that they require to move an
account from one family to another is a letter signed by authorized
signatories.  I have drafted the letter and I will sent it to them if there
are no problems with this from the legal department.  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Terri


Chris, as per our discussion, I just want to confirm that we have the ability
to break the contract with the EPC provider at any time.  Further, I want to
confirm that our costs will be minimal and that this whole process (ie
putting a number on a term sheet) has been based on trying to maximize the
short run value of the project.  In other works, we have no intention of
lifting their offer.  Finally, we are not ordering HRSG's or steam turbines.

These guys add no value and they are killing me!

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
07:14 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
09/26/2000 07:12 PM
To: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Las Vegas CoGen

Guys, I have explained the strategy/tactics that have lead to this position
in some detail.  In my opinion the company is not at risk and potentially ENA
could create significant value from a project that we have very little
invested.  I understand the construction risk on the bid as much as anyone
and we have no intention of lifting their offer. As far as EECC involvement,
as I had mentioned, Coleman was a part of all these discussions.  I will
argue that Mike and the ENA deal team made the right call necessary to
maximize return in the short run for Enron without investing significant
dollars or taking significant risks.

Obviously, I was unsuccessful in explaining such a sophisticated strategy.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
07:01 PM ---------------------------

Dick Westfahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/26/2000 09:30 AM
To: Dave Delainey
cc: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Las Vegas CoGen

Dave:

See attached memo.

Thanks,

Dick


Looks good to me.

	Julie Ferrara
	05/31/2000 01:54 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Ticker Item Approval for US Gas MONTHLY Products

Mark,
Dave Forster asked me to send you the ticker item below for your review.
Dave has already approved the text.  Please let me know if you have any
changes or concerns.

Thank you.
Julie Ferrara
---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 01:50
PM ---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  05/31/2000 11:35 AM

To: Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: US Gas MONTHLY Products

Julie,

Could you please put this ticker item out on the Web on June 1, 2000.  It
needs to stay out there for two weeks.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Thank you,

Melba
58986

Changes to US Gas Monthly Product Description

In order to improve the clarity of the Product description on the website,
please note that effective June 1, 2000 the description for:

US Gas Monthly IF CNG SP  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF CNG SP
US Gas Monthly IF EP Perm  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF EP Perm
US Gas Monthly IF EP San Juan  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF EP San Juan
US Gas Monthly IF TCO Pool  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF TCO Pool
US Gas Monthly IF TETCO M3  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF TETCO M3
US Gas Monthly IF Transco Z6NY  has been changed to  US Gas Swap IF Transco
Z6NY

---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 11:31
AM ---------------------------

Scott Neal
05/30/2000 05:21 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: US Gas MONTHLY Products

thanks to everyone for your help.

Dale Neuner   05/30/2000 04:04 PM

To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: US Gas MONTHLY Products

Melba -

Please draft a ticker item and let's make these changes as quickly as we can.

Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 03:50
PM ---------------------------

Scott Neal
05/30/2000 03:39 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: US Gas MONTHLY Products

US Gas Swap works fine.  Thanks for being creative and flexible. Let's go
with this ASAP.

Dale Neuner   05/25/2000 11:02 AM

To: Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: US Gas MONTHLY Products

I brought this issue up to David Forster AGAIN, and again he suggests that if
we are going to change the Product Description that we call it US Gas Swap -
so a Product on the website would read, for example:

US Gas Swap   IF CNG SP               Jun00           USD/MM

We really don't want to change the name to Fixed/Float because the US Gas
Daily products are ALSO Fixed
Float trades, and we are afraid we would be misleading.

Please talk about this and if this suggestion is acceptable we will make the
changes. Also please remember that this
change requires manual intervention, so each month when you roll the product
over you will need to let us know to
make the change when you call to have the product activated. We also won't be
able to use Tokenized Reference
Periods on these Products.

Dale


Gerald, here is some language that we have used in the past. I have adjusted it to reflect ENA. If there are any other changes, please do so. Otherwise, Sandy is will attach this to a file we are sending out with some historical numbers.

Pls note: IF there are any changes, copy me on them and I will update my file.

BT


Deregulation: `Conspiracy of Incompetence'
Even if energy prices are being manipulated, it may not be illegal

David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
STATE -- Profit-hungry power companies may be manipulating California's
electricity prices, industry insiders say, but the attorney general will have
a tough time finding a smoking gun in his price-fixing probe. Even if he does
prove that electricity generators are ``gaming'' the market with a variety of
price-influencing techniques, it's a whole other matter as to whether their
actions violate the law.
State legislators will attempt to shed some light on this murky matter during
hearings today in Sacramento.
What they will quickly discover is that power companies are having a field
day as California muddles through deregulation of its electricity market.
Among other things, power generators are said to be rigging electricity
auctions and holding back juice until higher demand drives up wholesale
prices, representing perhaps the single most glaring example of gaming, or
price-fixing, the market.
However, the generators aren't the only ones to blame for the current mess.
``This has literally been a conspiracy of incompetence,'' said Michael
Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San
Diego grass- roots organization. ``Almost every player has made major
mistakes or a series of mistakes.''
Utilities, he said, are also to blame for whopping price increases by
mishandling power purchases. Meanwhile, state and federal regulators have
demonstrated a virtually unwavering reluctance to weigh in and help stabilize
electricity rates.
At the same time, legislators themselves share some of the blame for
California's energy woes by drafting rules for the deregulated market that
are too easily bent, if not broken.
``All the market participants are taking advantage of very lax rules,'' said
Loretta Lynch, president of the California Public Utilities Commission. ``The
market is not competitive.''
As a stopgap, Gov. Gray Davis yesterday called on the PUC to cut San Diego
electricity prices in half over the next two years, although he was vague on
how this can be accomplished.
1996 DEREGULATION
When electricity deregulation was approved in 1996, the goal was to lower
prices by boosting competition.
In practice, however, only about a half-dozen power generators are now
responsible for as much as three-quarters of the state's energy supply, and
they can set prices pretty much as they see fit.
Officials at the California Power Exchange, the wholesale market where power
companies sell their juice and utilities go shopping, insist that they
closely monitor all transactions.
But they admit that it is impossible to know what may transpire among
generators off the trading floor.
``There are hundreds of ways that somebody could do it,'' exchange spokesman
Jesus Arredondo said of whether price-fixing is possible. ``You could argue
that it happens every day.
``But I don't see how you could call this gaming,'' he said. ``You call it
business.''
There's the rub. Although residents of San Diego, the first California city
to feel the full effects of deregulation, have seen average power bills more
than double over the past three months, power generators say this is simply a
result of supply and demand.
SUPPLY LIMITED, DEMAND RISING
With supply severely limited -- no major power plants have been built in the
state in a decade -- and demand rapidly rising, it is only natural, they say,
that electricity prices would go through the roof.
``It's a feast-or-famine business,'' said Gary Ackerman, executive director
of Menlo Park's Western Power Trading Forum, an energy industry group. ``You
make a lot of money when times are good, and lose a lot of money when times
are bad.''
At the moment, times are very good for power generators. An unusually hot
summer has combined with a booming, tech-fueled economy to push California's
power grid nearly to the breaking point on an almost daily basis.
The question is: Are power companies benefiting from what are, for them,
lucky circumstances, or are they making a bad situation even worse with
practices that may not be illegal but still could be viewed as highly
irresponsible?
FOUR WHOLESALE MARKETS
There are four major wholesale markets for electricity in California. The
biggest is called the daily forward market, where generators and utilities
meet each morning to buy and sell power on an hour-by-hour basis covering the
next 24 hours.
Electricity at times of expected low demand, such as 1 a.m., might go for as
little as $25 per megawatt, while electricity during peak demand -- 3 p.m. to
7 p.m. -- often sells for the maximum allowable amount, or $250 per megawatt.
Longer-term contracts are negotiated on what is called the block forward
market, where prices are more stable.
But, industry sources say, power companies are increasingly focusing more on
the hourly and real-time markets, where the potential for profit is greater
than on the daily forward market because buyers have less room to maneuver --
they have to meet immediate demand.
``Of course people are gaming the market,'' said Dan Richard, senior vice
president of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ``They know when to make bids and
how to get what they want. Is that illegal? I honestly don't know.''
Brian Rahman, who oversees the real-time wholesale market on behalf of the
California Independent System Operator, agreed that the legality of such
moves has yet to be determined.
``The power marketers know our rules,'' he said, ``and they use them to their
benefit.''
Even so, Power Exchange officials said they will tell legislators today that
their own study of wholesale electricity prices shows that California rates
in June and July were in fact lower than in other states.
``This makes it harder to make a case that market power is being exerted by
power generators,'' said the exchange's Arredondo. ``It's exceedingly
difficult to prove that there's market power.''
NO HEDGING IN SAN DIEGO
Meanwhile, San Diego Gas & Electric has been accused of adding to electricity
price volatility in the Southern California city by not securing long-term
contracts for energy at a steady rate -- a process known as ``hedging.''
Instead, the utility exposed its customers to daily price spikes, which
resulted in power bills surging skyward.
``San Diego is bearing the brunt (of deregulation) for a couple of reasons:
poor hedging and poor hedging,'' Arredondo said.
For its part, PG&E has said it learned its lesson from San Diego and will
make active use of hedging when its customers face the impact of
deregulation, perhaps as soon as next summer.
Davis called last week for Attorney General Bill Lockyer to investigate
``possible manipulation'' in the wholesale electricity market. He also has
asked federal regulators to rule that California's energy market is not
competitive and to mandate ``just and reasonable'' rates.
But regulators at both the federal and state levels so far have been
reluctant to act, preferring instead to allow deregulation to run its course.
For all these reasons, California's energy market has been especially
vulnerable to exploitation by those who may not have consumers' best
interests at heart.
``The system of responsibility is fragmented,'' the PUC's Lynch said, ``and
because it is fragmented, it allows various players to game the market.''
WHAT CAN BE DONE
The solution? It depends who you ask. Most of those on the energy playing
field believe that some degree of regulation is necessary to stabilize
electricity prices, but no one yet knows how far legislators should go in
drafting revised rules.
Increased generating capacity will go a long way toward solving California's
problems, but it will be years before enough new plants come online to bring
supply and demand into balance.
Today's hearings in Sacramento will presumably lay the groundwork for future
initiatives. Although few if anyone knows how to fix things, everyone at
least agrees that something -- anything -- needs to be done.
``Government messes things up a lot of times, and the private sector messes
things up a lot of times,'' said PG&E's Richard. ``But in the end, solutions
emerge because it's just too important. That's the case now.''
E-mail David Lazarus at davidlaz@sfgate.com.
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
*****
Gov. Davis Calls for Cut in Electricity Bills
PUC under no obligation to heed unclear request
David Lazarus, Lynda Gledhill, Greg Lucas, Chronicle Staff Writers
Thursday, August 10, 2000
,2000 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/08/10/B
U99453.DTL&type=business
Gov. Gray Davis yesterday called on the California Public Utilities
Commission to cut soaring San Diego electricity bills in half during the next
two years.
However, it was not clear how he expects the PUC to accomplish this goal or
whether the commission will even heed the governor's request. Davis does not
have the authority to order the PUC to act.
``This is not a rate freeze,'' Davis told reporters in Sacramento. ``It is a
rate-stabilization plan.''
It appears that what he has in mind is having San Diego Gas & Electric, the
local utility, level out power bills by spreading its wholesale costs over
longer periods. This would reduce customers' bills in the summer but raise
bills at other times of the year.
``This is an oraclelike document,'' Michael Shames, executive director of San
Diego's Utility Consumers' Action Network, said after reading a press release
outlining the governor's position. ``You can read almost anything into it.''
Calling electricity prices in San Diego exorbitant, Davis said he wants the
PUC to reduce average residential power bills from the current level of about
$120 a month to approximately $65.
``Electricity is the pulse of our economy,'' he said. ``Without it, consumers
and businesses are put at risk. California simply cannot afford any more
price spikes or blackouts.''
Carl Wood, a Davis appointee on the PUC, said he believes the governor is
seeking a so-called level pricing program for SDG&E customers. The PUC is
empowered to order the utility to implement such a program.
The utility itself already is urging ratepayers to adopt a similar pricing
plan, thereby paying consistent electricity fees throughout the year.
``We can't make the prices go away, but we can set up a system where the
prices are level and deferred,'' Wood said.
PUC President Loretta Lynch said she will call a special meeting of the
commission for August 21 to discuss the governor's proposal.
Davis' comments came ahead of a joint hearing today at 10 a.m. on
California's energy woes by the Senate and Assembly utilities committees in
the Capitol Building.
Also today, state Sen. Dede Alpert, D-Coronado (San Diego County), and
Assemblywoman Susan Davis, D-Kensington, are expected to introduce identical
bills seeking to roll back electricity rates in San Diego to prederegulation
levels.
``We appreciate what the governor has done, but we feel there needs to be a
parallel track in the Legislature where we find a solution for San Diego
ratepayers,'' Alpert said.
The governor said he will contact President Clinton and James Hoecker,
chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to urge them to
expedite an investigation of California's wholesale electricity market.
He also has called on Attorney General Bill Lockyer to probe suspected price
fixing by power generators.
``I believe in making a profit,'' Davis said. ``I believe in success. But
charging seven, eight, nine times the price you pay for electricity is simply
unconscionable. It's not fair to California. It will bring down our economy,
and it augers very poorly for America.''
Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy said it may sail to the rescue in San Diego by
bringing in its own electricity- generating equipment to keep its extensive
bases in the area humming.
The Navy is SDG&E's single biggest customer, drawing about 3 percent of the
utility's total output.
The Navy said in a statement that it is looking into transporting 10
750-kilowatt generators from its facility in Port Heuneme to San Diego.
For its part, the California Grocers Association said its members will reduce
electricity usage by 10 percent during periods of unusually heavy demand.
This could include lowering store lighting and cutting air conditioning at
some supermarkets.
``Although consumers may notice some differences while in their local
supermarket, the energy-saving measures will not affect normal store
operations,'' said Peter Larkin, president of the association. ``Also, none
of these measures will have a negative impact on food safety or quality.''


000
WTNT32 KNHC 260829
TCPAT2
BULLETIN
SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO ADVISORY NUMBER	7
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 AM AST MON NOV 26 2001

...SUBTROPICAL STORM NOW STATIONARY...

AT 5 AM AST...0900Z...THE CENTER OF SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO WAS
LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 30.2 NORTH...LONGITUDE 55.6 WEST OR ABOUT
555 MILES...895 KM...EAST-SOUTHEAST OF BERMUDA.

THE STORM IS NEARLY STATIONARY...AND A SLOW AND ERRATIC MOTION IS
EXPECTED OVER THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR  70 MPH...110 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS.	SOME INCREASE IN STRENGTH IS POSSIBLE AND THE SYSTEM COULD
BECOME A HURRICANE DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

WINDS OF 40 MPH EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 690 MILES...1110 KM
MAINLY TO THE NORTH OF THE CENTER.  THIS IS A VERY LARGE STORM AND
SWELLS GENERATED BY IT MAY AFFECT PORTIONS OF THE EAST COAST OF
NORTH AMERICA AND THE NORTH-FACING BEACHES OF THE BAHAMAS AND
GREATER ANTILLES DURING THE NEXT FEW DAYS.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS  979 MB...28.91 INCHES.

REPEATING THE 5 AM AST POSITION...30.2 N... 55.6 W.
MOVEMENT...STATIONARY.	MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 70 MPH.  MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE... 979 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL
HURRICANE CENTER AT 11 AM AST.

FORECASTER FRANKLIN

Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm

To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email

DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments,  send
them to storm@cimedia.com

Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com

You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700

Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media


Folks,
We are working with the hotel to have walking maps provided for you with
directions from the hotel to the restaurant.  For those of you that will be
coming from other places, here is the name and address of the restaurant:

Capp's Corner
1600 Powell Street
(415) 989-2589

Lunch will begin at 1 pm. The after lunch event will end at around 4:30. The
special event will be very fun. It will be a rare chance to see a uniquely
San Franciscan event.

Looking forward to seeing you all,

Todd Hudson
Information Systems Analyst
Gas System Operations
415.973.1386

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Hudson, Todd
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:52 PM
> To:	'kvanpelt@cmsenergy.com'; 'jhickman@nisource.com';
> 'jtyoung@nisource.com'; 'Iris_g._king@dom.com'; 'theresa.hess@enron.com';
> 'Lynn.blair@enron.com'; 'randy.young@gulfsouthpl.com';
> 'tom_gwilliam@iroquois.com'; 'michael.d.rasmuson@williams.com';
> 'janie.k.nielsen@williams.com'; 'Ruth.Clark@neg.pge.com';
> 'jarregu@mail.pnm.com'; 'Michelle_M_Willis@reliantenergy.com';
> 'tjwilliams@reliantenergy.com'; 'csuarez@reliantenergy.com';
> 'pdavidson@socalgas.com'; 'RIshikawa@socalgas.com';
> 'mark.gracey@elpaso.com'
> Cc:	Hudson, Todd; Snyder, Cheryl; Wood, Jeanne; Pon, Wayman; Johnson,
> Kirk
> Subject:	Pipeline Interconnect Forum - Sunday Event Schedule
>
> This email is intended for those Forum participants who have confirmed for
> the Sunday kickoff event.
>
> Lunch will be starting at 1 pm. You will need to travel from the hotel to
> the restaurant (allow approximately 30 minutes). Lunch will be followed by
> another activity which will conclude around 4:30 pm.
>
> More detailed information will be sent out in the next few weeks on the
> location and directions to the restaurant.
>
> Todd Hudson
> Information Systems Analyst
> California Gas Transmission
> Pacific Gas & Electric Company
> 415.973.1386
>


Notice # 01-168
May 17, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Revised Implementation Date for New NYMEX Rule 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

DATE:
May 16, 2001
===========================================================
Previously, in Notice to Members #01-154, the Exchange stated that new NYMEX
Rule 9.11A
(&Give-Up Trades8) would go into effect on June 1, 2001.  The Exchange is
revising the implementation timeframe in order to provide Floor Members and
Member Firms with additional time to obtain necessary records and become
compliant with the requirements.  Accordingly, please be advised that this
rule now will go into effect beginning on the trade date of August 1, 2001.
Further, it is anticipated that a similar rule will be implemented for the
COMEX Division following final review and approval by the COMEX Governors
Committee.

! In the absence of an applicable give-up agreement, new Rule 9.11A will
define the respective responsibilities/obligations to an order of executing
brokers, customers and Clearing Members.

! The term &executing broker8 as used in Rule 9.11A refers to the registered
billing entity, Member Firm or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

! Rule 9.11 will provide that, in the absence of an applicable give-up
agreement, a Clearing Member may reject a trade only if: (1) the trade
exceeds trading limits established by the Clearing Member for that customer
that have been communicated to the executing broker as provided by the rule
or (2) the trade is an error for which the executing broker is responsible.

! The new rule also places affirmative obligations on executing brokers to
confirm Clearing Member authorization for an account.  For example, prior to
an executing broker accepting and executing an initial order for any new
customer account, such executing broker must confirm with the Clearing Member
by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(a) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(b) the account number;
(c) the brokerage rate;
(d) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(e) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
Moreover, the executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the
specifics of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party,
date, time, and any other relevant information.  The Compliance Department
will conduct periodic audits of such records, and falsification of such
information shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

If you have any questions concerning this new rule, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Thomas LaSala, Vice President, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2897; or Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance
Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928,

NEW RULE 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

(Entire rule is new.)

Rule 9.11A Give-Up Trades

In the absence of a give-up agreement whose terms and conditions govern the
responsibilities/obligations of executing brokers, customers and Clearing
Members, the following rules shall define the respective
responsibilities/obligations of those parties to an order.  The &executing
broker8, as used in this rule, is the registered billing entity, Member Firm
or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

(A)   Responsibilities/Obligations of Clearing Members

(1). Limits Placed by Clearing Member.   A Clearing Member may, in its
discretion, place trading limits on the trades it will accept for give-up for
a customer,s account from an executing broker, provided however, that the
executing broker receives prior written or electronic notice from the
Clearing Member of the trading limits on that account.  Notice must be
received by the executing broker in a timely manner.  A copy of such notice
shall be retained by the Clearing Member.

(2). Trade Rejection.  A Clearing Member may reject (&DK8) a trade only if:
(1) the trade exceeds the trading limits established under Section I(A) of
this rule for that customer and it has been communicated to the executing
broker as described in Subsection (A); or (2) the trade is an error for which
the executing broker is responsible.  If a Clearing Member has a basis for
rejecting a trade, and chooses to do so in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 2.21(B), it must notify the executing broker promptly.

(3). Billing.  A Clearing Member will pay all floor brokerage fees incurred
for all transactions executed by the executing broker for the customer and
subsequently accepted by the Clearing Member by means of the ATOM system.
Floor brokerage fees will be agreed upon in advance among the Clearing
Member, customer and the executing broker.

(B) Responsibilities/Obligations of Executing Brokers

(1) Customer Order Placement.  An executing broker will be responsible for
determining that all orders are placed or authorized by the customer.  Once
an order has been accepted, a broker or the broker,s clerk must:

(a) confirm the terms of the order with the customer;
(b) accurately execute the order according to its terms;
(c) confirm the execution of the order to the customer as soon as
practicable; and
(d) transmit such executed order to the Clearing Member as soon as
practicable in accordance with Exchange Rules and procedures.

2. Use of Other Persons.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the executing
broker is allowed to use the services of another broker in connection with
the broker,s obligations under these rules.  The executing broker remains
responsible to the customer and Clearing Member under these rules.

3.  Executing Broker Responsibility for Verifying Clearing Member
Authorization.  Prior to a broker accepting and executing an initial order
for any new customer account, the executing broker must confirm with the
Clearing Member by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(f) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(g) the account number;
(h) the brokerage rate;
(i) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(j) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
The executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the specifics
of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party, date, time,
and any other relevant information.  The falsification of such information
shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

4. Rejection of Customer Order.  Where an executing broker has confirmed
Clearing Member authorization to execute orders on behalf of a customer in
accordance with this Rule 9.11A, the broker may, in the broker,s discretion,
reject an order that the customer transmits to the broker for execution.  The
broker shall promptly notify the customer and the Clearing Member(s) of any
such rejection.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-168)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


John,

I have the electronic versions of my presentations on my laptop.
I shall E-mail both presentations to you tonight.
Thanks for your interest.

Vince

"O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> on 07/18/2000 02:15:09 AM
To: "Vincent Kaminski (E-mail)" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Vincent,

I had to leave the conference early today, and I've just realised back in
the office as I went through my conference notes that I didn't receive a
copy of your presentation.  I'm not sure whether you gave out copies of your
presentaton or not.  However, if you did distribute copies at the
conference, would you be able to email me a copy?  No problems if you did
not give out copies or if you haven't got a copy handy.

Kind regards,

John O'Brien
Manager, Treasury & Risk Management
Snowy Hydro Trading Pty Ltd
Level 17, Bligh House
4 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000


-----Original Message-----
From: TruOrange@aol.com <TruOrange@aol.com>
To: TruOrange@aol.com <TruOrange@aol.com>
Date: Monday, June 12, 2000 11:02 AM
Subject: True Orange, June 12, 2000, Part 2

Part 2 - True Orange

Texas Loses to LSU in World Series, Plays FSU Tonight

The Texas baseball made a huge leap from fourth in the Big 12 to no worse
than a tie for seventh in the country and it could be even better than that
by the time you read this newsletter.
The Longhorns won their way into the College Baseball Series in Omaha by
winning a sub-regional, then a super regional in the last two weeks.
No. 2 seed LSU, which won four national titles in the 1990s, burst the No. 7
seed Longhorns' bubble, at least temporarily, with a 13-5 thumping Saturday
night in the first round of the World Series.
That threw Texas into the loser's bracket and the Horns were to play Florida
State, a 6-4 loser to Southern Cal Saturday, in an elimination game at 6
p.m.
tonight (Monday).
If the Longhorns lose, their season is over. If they win, they will play the
loser of the winner's bracket game between LSU and USC. If they win that
game, then they would have to beat the unbeaten team twice to win their
division and set up a championship game against the winner of the other
four-team bracket.
That is a tall order because it means the Longhorns would have to win win
five straight games to capture their fifth national title.
But, whatever happens tonight or later in the tournament, coach Augie
Garrido
and his Longhorns are back in Omaha for the first time since 1993 and UT
baseball is back on track.
They did it by snapping out of a late-season slump that saw them get shut
out
three times in their last six regular season games, then go 1-2 in the Big
12
Tournament.
Because of their slow finish, they were sent to a tough sub-regional in
Tempe, Arizona, where the host team, powerful Arizona State, was a big
favorite to advance.
The Longhorns opened by beating Creighton, 5-4, but then they fell to ASU,
3-1, to drop into the loser's bracket. It was a waste of an outstanding
pitching performance by Beau Hale, who held the powerful Sun Devils at bay
for most of the day.
The Horns had to come back and play again that same day, May 27, and
freshman
Ray Clark saved the season by pitching a three-hitter in an 11-1 romp past
Miami of Ohio. It was an amazing performance by a true freshman and it also
was a breakout game for the Longhorn hitters, who had snoozed through most
of
May.
That meant Texas had to beat ASU on the Sun Devils' home field twice on May
28 after playing two games on May 27 to advance.
But Clark's complete game gave Texas a chance because it kept the Horns from
depleting their pitching staff before even getting to the final day.
Phil Seibel, who missed almost the entire season with a sore arm, allowed
just five hits and one earned run in 6 1/3 innings and Ben Emond drove in
two
runs and scored two more to power Texas to a 6-4 win in the first game.
Freshman Ryan Hubele hit a three-run homer and Beau Hale put down a threat
in
the ninth to give the Horns the championship game by a 9-7 score.
Hubele was the tourney MVP after hitting .529 and batting in six runs.
Second
baseman Tommy Nicholson, shortstop Todd West, outfielder Matt Rosenberg and
pitchers Hale and Seibel made the All-Tournament team.
The championship in Tempe earned the Horns a host spot in a super regional
against Penn State.  Texas won the opener, 7-3, behind the pitching of D. J.
Jones, then mauled the Lions, 10-0, behind Hale's three-hit, 12-strikeout
performance.
By the time most of you read this, the Longhorns' season might be over, so
let's look to the future.
Most of the key pitchers on this team will be gone next year, but a few of
them will return, and Garrido and his staff have signed some great arms to
replace the guys who are leaving.
They also have signed some big sticks that should enable the Horns to start
winning a few slugfests.
They have rounded up an outstanding 26-man recruiting class that gives them
an excellent chance of being able to reload instead of undertaking a
complete
rebuilding job next baseball season.
They had a 25-man class that was really good, but they added No. 26 last
weekend and that really was the frosting on the cake because he is Ben King,
a slugging, hard-throwing lefthander from Grapevine who is leaving Alabama
and coming to Texas after an outstanding freshman season.
After getting the Longhorns into the College Baseball World Series this
year,
nothing would be sweeter than doing it again next year, and this group of
recruits just might help them accomplish that feat.
Of the 26 recruits, only two great prospects seem likely to sign. They are
catcher Scott Heard of Rancho Bernardo High School in suburban San Diego and
first baseman Jason Stokes of Coppell.
Heard, 6-2, 190, hit .303 last season with 10 homers, but he is more famous
for his defensive prowess. The pro scouts think he is the best overall
catching prospect in several years, and that prompted the Texas Rangers to
draft him in the first round.
Stokes, 6-5, 235, is an incredible power hitter who batted .567 and blasted
25 home runs last season and was chosen by the Florida Marlins with the
first
pick in the draft's second round.
Both are expected to receive offers that will be very difficult to pass up.
Both families say negotiations with their pro teams are in the early stages.
They also say, contrary to published reports, that no firm offers have been
made.
Let's take a quick look at the other 24 UT recruits. Most of them signed in
the early period, but this is an up-to-date look at how they performed in
the
just-completed baseball season.

Late Transfer Bonus Baby (1)
Ben King, 6-1, 195, will be eligible next season as a sophomore because you
don't have to sit out a year in baseball when you transfer. He was one of
the
state's top recruits last year and picked Alabama over Texas. He was an
honorable mention freshman All-America at Alabama after hitting 13 home runs
and batting .294 as a designated hitter. But King was a dominating pitcher
in
high school and he wants to pitch, too. He only pitched  four innings at
Alabama, and that, in a nutshell, is why he will be a Longhorn next season.
As a lefty with good control and a 91-mile-an-hour fastball, he'll get to
pitch more than that at Texas in 2001. The Horns can use that powerful bat,
too. With the low scholarship limits in baseball (11.7 total, chopped into
various sizes), pitcher-hitter combos give double value.

Pitchers (10)
Albert Montes, 6-2, 205, is a righthanded pitcher from El Paso who was the
ace of the National JC World Series champs from Grayson JC in Denison. He
went 11-3 and Grayson coach Tim Tadlock said, "Albert Montes should have
been
the MVP of the national tournament. He won the opening game for us, then
came
back to win two other games. He has a fastball in the 90s to go along with a
good curve, but the thing that makes him so good is that he changes his arm
angles a lot and gives the batters a lot of different looks. He's a real
bulldog on the mound." Montes pitched the championship game on two days'
rest
and gave up three hits and one run while striking out 13. He was the
national
tourney's Most Valuable Pitcher in 1999 and 2000 and won the title game both
times.
Justin Simmons, 6-3, 200, is a lefty with great control who led Duncanville
to the Class 5A State Tournament for the third straight year. He had a
losing
outing against The Woodlands in the state semifinals, but wound up 12-3 for
the year. In 94 innings, he gave up 75 hits, walked 19 and struck out 126.
He
has three pitches he can throw for strikes on a consistent basis ) a
changeup, a curve and a moving 85-mph fastball. In addition to being the
dominant pitcher in the Dallas area, he also was one of the leading hitters
with a .479 average and eight home runs. He plays first base when he isn't
on
the mound.
Tim McGough, 5-11, 170, is a righthander from Fort Worth Nolan who went 7-0
last season with a 0.48 ERA. He pitched a 7-0 shutout against Houston St.
Pius in the State TAPPS semi-finals and struck out 78 batters in 40 innings,
while walking only eight batters. He has been clocked as high as 94 mph, and
consistently throws in the 90-92 range, and he also has an outstanding curve
ball. He also averaged 14 points a game as the shooting guard on the Nolan
basketball team.
Bankston McMath, 5-11, 165, is from Corsicana and he played the last two
years at Navarro JC. He is a righthander who was the team's closer last
season. He notched 10 saves and averaged two strikeouts per inning. He has a
consistent 93 mph fast ball, and has been clocked as high as 96. He also
played shortstop for Navarro and batted .300 with five home runs.
Chris Neuman, 6-2, 190, is a lefthanded pitcher-slugger who could be the
comeback kid of the year. As a junior, he had a live fastball in the low
90s,
struck out 91 in 42 innings and had an 0.83 ERA. But he hurt his shoulder
late in the season and had arthroscopic surgery. He did not pitch his senior
year, but hit .485 with six home runs. His father, Harvey, told me the
doctors think his shoulder is fine now and he should be able to resume
pitching at Texas with no ill effects from the surgery. If he does recover
completely, a lefthander with good control and a live 90-mph fastball is a
thing of beauty when he plays for you and a terror to behold when he plays
for the other team.
Gerrit Simpson, 6-3, 195, is a righthanded pitcher-first baseman from
Claremore, Okla., who played the last two years at Connors JC in Oklahoma.
He
was 8-2 as a pitcher last season who averaged more than 1 1/2 strikeouts per
inning and allowed only two walks per game. His fast ball is consistent
around 90 and has been clocked as high as 93. He also has a good curve ball.
He hit .400, too.
Derek Denman, 6-3, 225, is a righthander from Euless Trinity who was the
closer on Grayson's JC title team. He had eight saves. In addition to a live
fastball that ranges from 88 to 91 miles per hour, he also has a very good
curve and an improving slider to go along with excellent control.
Derrick Grigsby, 6-0, 195, is a righthander who led Marshall deep into the
Class 5A state playoffs. He went 11-1 with a 1.5 ERA and pitched a 2-0
shutout against the eventual state finalist team from The Woodlands in the
state playoffs, but the Mavericks lost the other two games in the series.
"Yeah, they beat us twice by one run," Grigsby told me. "That really hurt."
His fast ball has been clocked as high as 93 miles per hour and he is
consistently in the 89-90 mph range.
Eugene Espineli, 6-4, 170, is a lefthander who went 10-2 with a 1.90 ERA for
Katy Taylor. He struck out 110 and walked only 22 in 75 innings. His best
pitches are a changeup and a fastball in the mid 80s.
John Zamora, 6-3, 205, is a native of Campbell, Cal., who played the last
two
seasons at Cabrillo JC in California. He is a righthander who has a good
slide and a fastball in the low 90s. Despite playing with a fractured thumb
on his throwing hand last season, he still posted a 6-4 record with a 2.5
ERA. He was drafted after his freshman year in JC, but was not drafted this
year. He signed with Texas last month, turning down offers from LSU, USC and
others.

Catchers (1)
Ben Anderson, 5-9, 180, is from Temalpais High School in Mill Valley, Cal.
He
hit .550 with 4 homers last season and has fine defensive skills.

Infielders (6)
Tim Moss, 5-11, 170, is a three-sport star who played second base and
shortstop at Lancaster. He hit .450 as a junior, but began working as a
switch hitter this season and hit .390 with five home runs. He was such an
outstanding point guard that he also received some basketball scholarship
offers and he ran a 10.6 100 meters for the track team. He has been clocked
at 6.4 in the 60.
Chase Lambin, 6-2, 185, is from Houston Cypress Falls and he played third
base the last two years for the two-time national JC champion Grayson team.
He batted .370 and blasted 11 homers last season.
Wayne Stone, 6-1, 185, is a second and third baseman from Riverside JC in
California. He originally is from Rialto JC. He hit .395 with four home runs
last season.
Omar Quintanilla, 5-9, 175, is a power-hitting shortston-second baseman from
el Paso Socorro. He hit .548 and belted 14 home runs as a senior.
Cooper Vittitow, 6-0, 180, played at Lubbock Monterey and has been playing
second and third base at Hill JC in Hillsboro for the last two years. He hit
.345 with six home runs last season.
Kasey Baker, 5-9, 170, played second and third base for Houston Langham
Creek
and batted .295 with six home runs last season. He has tremendous defensive
skills.
Outfielders (6)
Vincent Sinisi, 6-1, 190, led The Woodlands to the Class 5A State
Championship game. He pitched the 11-1 semifinal victory over Duncanville,
running his record to 9-2 this season, but he is first and foremost a
hitter.
Despite a nagging sprained ankle that had his batting average lagging below
.300 early in the season, he went on a hitting tear in the late season and
playoffs and raised the average to .400 while hitting 10 home runs.
Gerald Napoleon, 5-9, 175, is from Aurora, Colo, and he played at New Mexico
JC in Hobbs for the last two seasons. He hit .477 and blasted nine home
runs,
and he also is an oustanding defensive centerfielder who has excellent
speed.
He signed last month.
Jake Duncan, 6-0, 180, batted .461 and hit 11 homers for Marshall's powerful
team and was named co-MVP in the district. His father, Doug, an Marshall
physician, was the catcher on UT's 1975 National Championship team. Jake's
younger brother, Zach, a pitcher-outfielder, was the district's Sophomore of
the Year.
Eric Sultemeier, 6-2, 180, is a fleet outfielder from New Braunfels. He hit
.417 with nine homers last season. He was the MVP in his district in
baseball
the last two years and was the Co-MVP in football last season after making
second-team All-State as a wide receiver. He was drafted by Cincinnati in
the
14th round.
Stephen Ripper, 6-5, 210, was on the outfielders on the Houston Bellaire
team
that went 66-4 during the last two seasons, winning state in 1999 with one
of
the best hitting teams I ever saw. He hit .413 with six home runs last
season.
Cody Roy Andre', 6-1, 195, is a native of Greely, Colo., who played the last
two seasons at Seward County JC in Liberal, Kan. He hit .401 with 15 homers
as a freshman, and batted .313 with six home runs as a sophomore.

Carlisle Honored

Duke Carlisle, who led the Longhorns to their first National Championship in
1963 and followed it up by throwing  two long touchdown passes in a 28-6
victory over No. 2 Navy in the 1964 Cotton Bowl, has been selected to the
Southwestern Bell Cotton Bowl Hall of Fame.
Ironically, Roger Staubach, who won the 1963 Heisman Trophy and was the Navy
quarterback, also was inducted into the Cotton Bowl Hall of Fame with
Carlisle.
The Longhorns took the No. 1 ranking in 1963 when they trounced top-ranked
Oklahoma, 28-7, and they held the top spot for the remainder of the season.
Carlisle played when freshmen were ineligible, but he still played in the
Cotton Bowl eight times ) three times against powerful Oklahoma teams, twice
against SMU and three times as the SWC champ. He had a 7-1 record, with the
only loss being to LSU in the 1963 Cotton Bowl Classic.
Carlisle was recruited out of Athens. He now lives in McComb, Miss.
He is the fourth Longhorn legend chosen for the Hall of Fame, joining his
coach, Darrell Royal, and two other Texas quarterbacks ) Bobby Layne and
James Street.

Next Issue July 17

The next issue will be e-mailed on July 17 and will have some interviews
with
the assistant football coaches. It will have a lot of recruiting news, which
probably will include some more early commitments.
It will also have a lot of news about pre-season football practice, which
will begin in early August, plus lots of other UT sports news.

I want to subscribe. I am enclosing $45 for the next year, which will
include
26 issues.  A two-year subscription is $85. For a one-year subscription via
E-Mail, send $35.

Name

Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address

City, State and Zip Code
Remit to True Orange, P O Box 26530, Austin, TX 78755
Foreign Rates Available on Request.    Phone  512-795-8536
E-Mail Address: truorange@aol.com

I want to give a gift subscription to  True Orange. I am enclosing $45.
Please send an appropriate gift card. For a gift subscription via E-Mail,
send $35.

Name of Person Receiving Gift

Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address

City, State and Zip Code

Your Name


We will be releasing new version of the Stack Manager and the EnronOnline
website tonight . The following are the changes

1. Changes to Stack Manager:

1.1 Changes to toolbar icons:
To facilitate further development of the system, it has been found necessary
to change the toolbar icons at the top of the Stack  Manager. The attached
file shows the old icon and its new replacement. Next to each image below is
the description of the function that is executed as well as the short cut key
that is mapped to the same function:

1.2 New Functionality - Auto Suspend
The Auto Suspend function allows traders to set an absolute price change from
a price level at which you would like the system to automatically suspend a
specific product. This function is useful if your products use automatic
price resets.

To activate this feature:
1. Select a product and click on Product Properties
2. Check the Enable box
3. Enter the Price Check and Suspend at +/- values
4. Click Update
Example: a trader Enables Auto Suspend and selects a $35.00 Price Check and a
suspension level of +/- $5.00: The system will suspend the product when the
mid price is above  $40.00 or below $30.00

You will need to enter a new Price Check or disable the Auto Suspend function
to reactivate this Product if the Auto Suspend is triggered.
Please note the system checks for any products that need to be suspended once
a minute.

2. Changes to EnronOnline Website
 (These changes will be rolled out in phases over the next week and will be
available to all customers only by Friday 5/4/01)

The following enhancements have been made to the EnronOnline Website:

2.1 Today,s Transactions

Float Window:  In order to float the window, right click on the Today,s
Transactions section, click on the Float Window option.

Sort Ordering: Click on the column heading to change the sort order.

Linked Transactions: You can display the linked Transactions in an expanded
or collapsed view. To do so, right click in the Transaction display area and
select full Expand or Full Collapse.

2.2 Submission Box

The submission box has been modified in order to show a space between each
set of &zeros8 for the volume the customer wants to sell/buy.

Savita


--------------------------vince kaminski

-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [NOTES:Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON]
To: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON [NOTES:All Enron Worldwide@ENRON]
Sent: Tue Nov 06 22:23:16 2001
Subject: Daily Update

Today was a very difficult day for us as market uncertainty continued.  Recent news reports, including The Wall Street Journal article today, have speculated about possible mergers, takeovers and equity investors as options that Enron is considering.  The reason you have not seen us responding to these reports is that it is our corporate policy not to comment on market speculation.  However, I will tell you that we are evaluating all options to protect the financial stability of this company.  I will keep you updated on developments as they occur.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/17/2000 09:05 PM -----

	Philippe A Bibi@ECT
	12/13/2000 05:39 PM

		 To: Steven Kean
		 cc:
		 Subject: "One Enron" - "One DID Number Range"

Steve,

Let me know if you agree that we switch to a uniform range of numbers...

Regards

Philippe
Proposal for Single Number Range for the New Enron Campus

For the opening of the New Enron Campus and the changing of the street
address from 1400 Smith St to 1500 Louisiana, we propose that
Enron elects to take a single DID number range for all in-bound
telecommunications.
This single number range would bolster the strategic plan of allocating a DID
to an employee
and that employee can take that number anywhere within the campus in a "Plug
n Play" environment.

Currently we have over 21000 DID's in operation in the following locations EB
, 2AC , 3AC , 500/600 Jeffersen and Penzoil Place .
The numbers are spread across three different ranges :

- 713 853 xxxx ( 6300 numbers )
- 713 345 xxxx ( 10,000 numbers )
- 713 646 xxxx  ( 5,000 numbers )

The proposal is to take a 70,000 number range to cover current and future
requirements. The benefits are :

 - less confusion to Enron customers and internal users
 - sufficient numbers to allow Enron to expand in the downtown area
 - increased capacity from one  range of numbers to cater for Fax or
multimedia applications
 - have a new identity to fall in line with ''One Enron'' philosophy

Due to the high utilization of DID numbers in the downtown area, we will not
get a (713) area code allocation, and we will be looking at the new ( 832)
area code.
We have been investigating (832) 363(ENE) XXXX as the range, however this
cannot be guaranteed.

To take this forward, I require high level approval of the scheme, we will
then pressure the suppliers and regulatory committee's to meet Enron's
requirements.


I don't know if this was ever resolved but Susan Pereira's name is on the
deal ticket.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 02:24
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steve Gillespie @ ENRON                           12/08/2000 10:09 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Formoso/Sport

Skippy and Chris,

I am not in the loop on the Formosa deal......

sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000
10:09 AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez@ECT
12/08/2000 09:58 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Charles Jacobs/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Formoso/Sport

Can you please help Client Services out on the pricing for Formosa
Plastics/Sport Pipelline.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
12/08/2000 09:56 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Charles Jacobs @ ENRON                           12/08/2000 09:36 AM

To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Formoso/Sport

Elizabeth...  Can you tell us if the terms of the Formosa Plastics/Sport
Pipeline deals have changed?  The terms USED to be Formosa got the first
15,000/day (deal 229875), Sport deal #244626 got the next 5,000/day and Sport
deal #244627 took the swing.  There have been new deals set up in Sitara for
November production that don't mirror that.  Formosa deal #463959 starts on
day 4 (what happened to days 1-3?) and gets the first 15,000/day.  Sport deal
# 456694 covers days 1-3 but the prices are tiered to include what looks like
Formosa's volume.  Sport deal #463958 covers the rest of the month but the
prices don't mirror the first 3 day's prices.  Do you see a problem here??!!

Help!!
...Chuck


Japan's Electricity Newspaper ("Denki Shimbun", the equivalent of Megawatt
Daily) has been running a series of articles about the new century.  Several
of these have focused on the power industry in the U.S.  A friend of mine ran
across one on Enron that was published on April 13 and sent it to me.  I
thought you would find it interesting.

The article focuses on EES in particular and about how we try to succeed by
being first to meet our clients' changing needs.  It also describes how we
use derivatives and risk management to reduce costs and stay competitive.
The article also briefly mentions the new office in Japan.

The most interesting thing about the article is how incredibly positive it is
about Enron.  Given what I have read and heard about how nervous the Japanese
are about deregulation of the industry, I really did not expect such praise.

Denki Shimbun also has a web site at "www.shimbun.denki.or.jp".  They have
small summaries of the important articles of the day (the site, however, is
completely in Japanese).  Another interesting site is
"www.criepi.denken.or.jp", the English home site of Japan's Central Research
Institute of Electric Power Industry (Denryoku Chuo Kenkyuujou).  The site
has many links to other English-language sites related to the power industry
in Japan.

Regards,

Eugenio


Hi there,

Could someone email me the latest version of the AIP?

Thanks,

Kay


Volumes for NNG:

2001 3CE - (1513.6 bcf total for year ) - Bcf / day = 4.147

2002 Plan - (1495.4 bcf total for year ) - Bcf / day = 4.097

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Sunday, November 04, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve; Moore, Jan
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	2001 3CE and 2002 Plan
Importance:	High

I need average throughput for the above as soon as possibe.

Jan, I need total not just west.

Please copy Rod on your reply to me.


Thank you for your helpful comments.  Good points.

On the timing issue, we still have the time sensitivity, but I hate to give
it a precise day.  Maybe the way to address that is within 10 BD's, as
mutually agreed.

I don't have the doc in front of me (I'm in Florida), but I thought it said
ENA was taking responsibility for increases in the Purchase Amount as it
exists the date of closing.  I'll check.

I agree with deleting CO definition.  It doesn't add anything.

Again, thanks.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 03/01/2001 02:07:06 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: Form for Blue Dog

Kay:

I have a few minor comments to the new draft of the LLC Letter Agreement:

1.  Section 2 - The new draft provides for closing "no later than 10
business days" after funding the escrow, while the old draft provided for
closing "on the 7th business day" after funding the escrow.  I have a
recollection that ENA actually needed the 7 business days and no less (thus
the requirement of ON the 7th business day) in order to prepare for closing,
and was trying to avoid the possibility of the counterparty wanting to close
before ENA could complete the matters required of it to properly effect a
transfer.  If the timing on this is not sensitive, the new draft is fine.

2.   Section 5(a) - The new draft provides that ENA is responsible for any
"increase in the Purchase Amount," if the increase is caused by ENA's acts
or omissions.  The new draft does not mention the base amount or point of
reference, any increase over which would thus be ENA's responsibility.  (The
old draft provided that ENA was responsible for the Purchase Amount, as
determined on the basis of facts and circumstances existing prior to
closing).

3.  Section 9(a)(xiv) - It appears that a verb is missing from this
sentence.

4.  Section 19(c) - I think the definition of "Commercial Operation" can be
deleted, since the only place it appears is in Section 19(g), where it is
used with the parenthetical (as defined in the Turbine Contract).  However,
we need to confirm that "commercial operation" is actually defined in the
Turbine Contract, as I believe this was the transaction where the term was
constantly used in the underlying agreement without definition.

5.  Section 19(g) - In the definition of "Take Over," replace both
references to "Unit" with references to the "GE Equipment".

Please call if you want to discuss these comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:05 AM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: Form for Blue Dog

Hi Carolyn,

Could you check this and see if I did anything stupid with the revisions:

(See attached file: Form of LLC Purchase Letter AgreementBD2u.doc)

Thanks,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Form of LLC Purchase Letter AgreementBD2u.doc


ATTACHED IS THE UPDATED CP LIST PER YOUR REQUEST
KRISTINE


- 1T%F01!.doc


John,

The credit contact at TXU is Chris Papousek 713-210-5085.

Thanx,

Chris


Janice Berke-Davis @ Equistar has asked to move around some of the firm deals
they have this month.  She would like these changes to be effective today,
September 19.  I don't have Sitara #'s, so I'll have to describe the packages
by volume and price

1. There is a package of 5,000/d @ meter # 1552 priced at greater of $4.35 or
IFHSC - $0.10.   She wants this package of gas moved to meter # 1373

2. There is a package of 5,000/d @ meter # 1553 priced at greater of $4.35 or
IFHSC - $0.10.   She wants 4,000/d of this package of gas moved to meter #
1373, leaving 1,000/d at meter #1553

If any questions, please call her directly at 713-652-4148

Thanks

Lee


Here is a list of all currently flowing deals with counterparties that Credit
has deemed not worthy of entering into physical trades with.  The file is
currently sorted to show the most recent trades up front and is filtered to
only show 'No Trades' - physical.  If you care to see other counterparty
designations, re-filter on the physical terms column.


See attached.


Start Date: 1/29/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012913.txt


on 713-858-5476


I threw the tree tag away, but I gave Lynn a bunch of bath goodies in the handle bag.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kearney, Julie
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Enron Elves

Hello all!

First, thank you for your generosity this holiday season, especially during this difficult time. Your gifts and donations will help bring holiday cheer into the lives of our three adopted families.

If you have chosen a gift tag from the tree:
Please make sure your gift is clearly labeled with the recipient's name and a description of the gift. (We want to insure that all of the children have received gifts.)
We ask that all gifts be wrapped and under the tree by Tuesday, December 18th.
Also, if you have not already dropped the half of the gift tag into the red/gold box by the tree, please do so. This will not only allow us to keep track of who is purchasing what and for whom, but it will also enter your name into the drawing for Blazer tickets.

Once again, we appreciate your participation in our Enron Elves Event. If you have any questions or suggestions about ways we can help make our adopted families' holiday even more jolly, please let us know.

Happy Holidays!

----The Enron Elves Team----

==============
For your reference, below is some information about our adopted children:

The Roberts Children
Selena (9 year-old girl)
Sam (5 year-old boy)

The Zurita Children
Felipe (13 year-old boy)
Carolina (8 year-old girl)
Kimberly (5 year-old girl)

The Pruitt Children
Laveria (3 year-old girl)
Deltric (11 month-old boy)


Jeanne,

Per our conversation, I am requesting a check for the remaining dollar value
from the relocation credit card provided to me.  The name as it appears on
the card is Matthew Smith.  My new address is:  2345 Bering Dr., Apt. 514,
Houston, TX 77057.  It would be great to have the check by the end of the
week.

Thanks you.

Mat


I knew you could.  I knew you could.  I knew you could.

	caroleg2@bellsouth.net
	01/25/2001 10:14 AM

		 To: jshankm@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: upcoming trip

looking forward to coming for a visit.  This is my first official e mail
.....Hooray for me. Love Mom.


I've learned that there is a netting agreement with FPL, on their form.  Only ENA signed it, although it attempts to include all commodities.

This netting agreement doesn't show up on the master netting list, so I thought I would mention it.

Kay


The recruiter with the Houston based origination job with a NY bank is Andrea Stein 212 704-9900


Second try, this time with the attachement

-----Original Message-----
From: Donohoo, Ken
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:47 PM
To: 1 CSC Working Group; 1 WMS and others(Wholesale Market Sub.); 1 2001
TAC and others
Cc: 1 MockMarket
Subject: CSC MRS Presentation

Attached to this email is a presentation made at yesterday MRS meeting.? The
last slide indicates calculated TTC limits between zones for the on peak
summer base case.? Have a great weekend.

?
Kenneth A. Donohoo, PE
Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
ERCOT
2705 West Lake Dr.
Taylor, TX 76574-2136
(512)248-3003, FAX(512)248-3082

?
 - KenDCSCMRS7.ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001
09:18 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
04/13/2001 03:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: option visualization

Vince and Stinson,

I did some reserach on the option visualization.  Here is one of the findings.

Check this web site, the image looks impressive:
http://home.online.no/~espehaug/VirtualWorld/VirtualOptionWorld.html
This is done through a free software LiveGraphics3D and Mathematica.

Take a look of the demo on the web site mentioned above to see if it is good
enough for our purpose.

Zimin

PS:
--------------

What Is LiveGraphics3D?

     LiveGraphics3D is a non-commercial Java 1.1 applet to display and
     rotate three-dimensional graphics produced by Mathematica in
     HTML pages. It may be used without charge for any
     non-commercial purposes. Mathematica is a program for symbolic
     and numeric mathematics by Wolfram Research, Inc.. Wolfram
     Research is also responsible for licensing LiveGraphics3D for
     commercial purposes.

     LiveGraphics3D enables all Mathematica users to put almost any
     three-dimensional graphics computed by Mathematica directly onto
     a HTML page, such that everyone with a web browser supporting
     Java 1.1 (e.g. Communicator 4.0 or Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher)
     can view and interactively rotate the graphics without any additional
     software.

     Additionally LiveGraphics3D is able to show animations, calculate
     stereo graphics, integrate hyperlinks, and display bitmap
     backgrounds. %


Here is Adrian Moore's White Paper on price caps, which incorporated some
points from my mini paper on the subject.

This looks like a good start and something that we can boil down to a "We
Believe" one pager for think tanks or economists to sign on to as a potential
next step.

Do you want to route comments through me for Adrian and give me your thoughts
about how best to market this?  At this point it is "our paper" but with the
RPPI tag line.

- Rob

----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2001 08:59 AM -----

	Adriantm@aol.com
	03/28/2001 11:51 PM

		 To: Rob.Bradley@enron.com, lkiesling@lycos.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft of Price Cap White Paper

Sorry about the delay--I spent a painful (but worth it) amount of time
yesterday doing media--two long press interviews and a ridiculous amount of
time working with Fox News O'Reilly Factor show, then going out to their
studio, meeting with O'Reilly and taping the show. ?Came out really good,
though, I think I did much better than the Greenpeace hack he had on after
me, who called me an "OPEC spokesman"!

Anyway--attached is the draft. ?As soon as I get your comments I will
finalize it and we will get it sent out to the relevant Congressmen, and
perhaps to some other targets as well. ?Rob--your advice on where to send it
will be welcome, and of course you guys can distribute it as you please.

Adrian
 - Price controls letter.doc


I'd like a schedule c (or any other schedule we have) update.  Also, how do
we start to accrue for bonuses for 2001?


Greetings:
Attached please find the agenda for the IEP Board meeting on December 19th.
Please note that this meeting will be held at IEP in the Pharmacy conference
room.  Unfortunately, there is no conference call in capability. Please let
me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - 12-11 IEP Board Agenda Draft 2.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 9:34 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	I wrote you a little poem.

Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
You're a pain in the ass,
But I s'pose I am, too.

So oft when we meet,
We fuss and we fight.
It becomes hard to see
That we share a love of great might.

But no matter the tears,
Or gut wrenching fears.
As we grow old,
We create a togetherness,
Lovely to behold.

xoxo


Thanks Eric.  Nice job handling all of this!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Cc:	McCarty, Danny
Subject:	ANNGTC Partnership

Stan,

A quick update-

I expect to sign and return the ANNGTC MOU tomorrow.
A contingent of the current and rejoining partners will meet with Senators in DC on Thursday.  Joe Hartsoe will represent us.
Following meetings with Senators, a joint press release will be issued announcing the MOU.  Gina Taylor and John Ambler are vetting the release/Q+A's; Gina will be the media contact.

I'll forward a complete package for your files when finalized.


4.30 bid at 4.40 for 580 contracts over 20 years

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barker, James
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:

Nymex quote from 10/2002 for 20 years, monthly numbers::

JAN
29250
26200
26000
23850
24800
24100
25000
24800
24000
24800
24150
28300

Thanks, Jim


you might want to package a deal and move up to number 1 b/c if not you wont
get the player you want.  daddy has #1.


Our next conference call will be held this Friday, September 15th at 10:00
a.m. New York time.  If you wish to participate, please call 888-904-9318
and give passcode "US REG" and leader is Stacy Carey.

Stacy Carey
Director of U.S. Regulatory Policy


Colleagues:

GA Support Services and Risk Analytics Groups shall communicate, shortly, a
system that shall allow you to have a monthly update on EES positions in your
service territories.  The system shall also provide the position to ad-hoc
requests as needed.

The update shall be on monthly basis, and could be customized as per your
needs/requests.    The primary sources can provide the following:
The position (long, short, and net) in electric utility "x"
The position (long, short, and net) per customer in the electric utility "x".
The position (long, short, and net) per rate schedule/customer class in
electric utility "x".
Aggregates of the above per State, NERC Region, and Customer.

GA Support, and Risk Analytics aim at providing the data on a
request-by-request basis in a user initiated system.  The Team is working on
building a system to answer your data request within 180 working minutes of
receiving it.  You shall receive an email of the persons to contact with
their coordinates (e.g., telephone numbers, location...etc.) shortly.

In designing this system, the Team is constrained by the EES stringent
request to guarantee that no third party can have access to data.  Part of
this concern  is mitigated by the request-by-request approach followed as it
will communicate the lowest level of disaggregated data.  Your utmost care in
dealing with these data, in my opinion, should satisfy any remaining concerns
for EES.

This the  beginning of a longer series of products and services in the
pipeline.  The Team is keen to know your opinion, and advice.  Any advice on
the likely frequency of needing this data, the level of details/aggregation
will be greatly useful and appreciated.

Best regards

AI
713-853-3037


This NERC announcement references that FERC would designate the new electric
reliability organization.  In yesterday's FERC Technical Conference on
Inter-RTO Seams, several of the Commissioners asked whether GISB and EISB
were appropriate forums for the establishment of commercial/market business
practices.
---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2001 08:12
AM ---------------------------

"Heather Gibbs" <Heather.Gibbs@nerc.net> on 06/19/2001 09:13:31 AM
To: <heather@nerc.com>
cc:

Subject: Broad Coalition Supports Electric Reliability Legislation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) and a broad-based
coalition of electric industry and state organizations urged members of
Congress and other key energy officials to support prompt passage of
federal legislation to promote and ensure the continued reliability of
high-voltage electric transmission systems in the United States and
throughout North America.  In letters to DOE Secretary Abraham, members
of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Representatives
Tauzin, Dingell, Barton and Boucher, and FERC Chairman Hebert, the
coalition stated that "It is critically important for Congress to act on
reliability legislation as soon as possible.  It will take many months
after legislation is enacted for FERC to adopt implementing rules and
designate the new electric reliability organization that the legislation
provides for.  In the meantime, consumers are exposed to increased risk
of failure of the transmission grid as more and more demands are placed
upon it."

For your convenience, a copy of the press release announcing the
coalition's support is shown below.

A copy is also posted on the following NERC web site:
http://www.nerc.com/pressrelease/

If you have any questions, let me know.

Sincerely,

Heather Gibbs

Contacts: Ellen P. Vancko
evancko@nerc.com or
Eugene F. Gorzelnik
efg@nerc.com

June 19, 2001

Broad Coalition Supports Electric Reliability Legislation

The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) and a broad-based
coalition of electric industry and state organizations urged members of
Congress and other key energy officials to support prompt passage of
federal legislation to promote and ensure the continued reliability of
high-voltage electric transmission systems in the United States and
throughout North America.  In letters to DOE Secretary Abraham, members
of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Representatives
Tauzin, Dingell, Barton and Boucher, and FERC Chairman Hebert, the
coalition stated that "It is critically important for Congress to act on
reliability legislation as soon as possible.  It will take many months
after legislation is enacted for FERC to adopt implementing rules and
designate the new electric reliability organization that the legislation
provides for.  In the meantime, consumers are exposed to increased risk
of failure of the transmission grid as more and more demands are placed
upon it."

For three decades, NERC and its member Regional Reliability Councils
have worked cooperatively and voluntarily to set reliability standards
for high-voltage transmission systems so that customers could enjoy
reliable electric service.  As electricity markets become increasingly
competitive, this voluntary arrangement will no longer suffice and needs
to be transformed into a mandatory system to assure a continued reliable
supply of electricity to America's homes and businesses. "Congress must
act soon on reliability legislation," said Michehl R. Gent, NERC
President and CEO.  "Enacting this legislation now is an important step
to ensure the continued reliability of the nation's high-voltage
electricity system, and one that should not wait."

Signing the letter are the North American Electric Reliability Council,
American Public Power Association, Canadian Electricity Association,
Edison Electric Institute, IEEE-USA, Large Public Power Council,
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, National
Association of State Energy Officials, National Association of State
Utility Consumer Advocates, National Electrical Manufacturers
Association, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Northwest
Regional Transmission Association, Transmission Access Policy Study
Group, and the Western Interconnection Coordination Forum.

For more information on NERC or its transformation into NAERO, visit
NERC's web site (http://www.nerc.com/).  The web site also includes
information on the electric industry's electricity supply and delivery
programs and activities.
*********************

NERC is a not-for-profit company formed as a result of the Northeast
blackout in 1965 to promote the reliability of the bulk electric systems
that serve North America. It works with all segments of the electric
industry as well as customers to "keep the lights on" by developing and
encouraging compliance with rules for the reliable operation of these
systems. NERC comprises ten Regional Reliability Councils that account
for virtually all the electricity supplied in the United States, Canada,
and a portion of Baja California Norte, Mexico.


Shirley,

We have not accepted him yet. I shall speak with him alone.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
08/01/2000 08:13 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Time

Vince:

David Dupre is wanting to meet with all the Research heads for a rotation
schedule.  Are you interested and do you want me to set it up?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
08:10 AM ---------------------------

David P Dupre
07/31/2000 05:26 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Time

Hi,

I wanted to inquire as to which day(s) might be convenient to meet with Vince
and his colleagues.

Many thanks
David


Chris,

No problem. Feel free to mention our names.

Vince

Chris Strickland <chris_strickland@compuserve.com> on 01/28/2000 03:54:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, les <les_clewlow@compuserve.com>, Jules
<lacima@compuserve.com>
cc:
Subject: Energy Book

Hi Vince,

I have pulled a list of names together that I would like to send some
samples of our chapters of the book too, in the next couple of days,  in
order to try and get one or two sentence "reviews" for the dust jacket of
the book. I obviously won't say anything about Enron's sponsorship until it
is official sorted out, but is it OK if I indicate that yourself and Grant
are contributing material to the book?

I'm proposing to send 5 or 6 chapters to the following - unless you have
any objections or suggestions?

David Shimko
Ehud Ronn
Helyette Geman
Mark Garman
Dragana Pilipovic
Corwin Joy
Ilia Bouchouev
Alexander Edyleland
Steve Thomas

Hope the writing is going OK, and regards to Grant.

Best regards.

Chris


You didn't know that? It's actually Mary Katherine Symes. My parents decided
that Katherine Mary didn't sound "Catholic" enough; but they still wanted a
daughter named Katie, so they went right ahead and called me that from the
day I was born. Needless to say, it's added an unnecessary element of
confusion to my life in that people are always wondering who the hell this
"Mary Symes" person is.

Thanks for noticing, though!

Mary Katherine


Nothing from Leatha.  Any news there?

Kay


???? Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip -SYDNEY- Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 29/03/2000 18:36 ---------------------------

Phillip -SYDNEY- Taylor
22/03/2000 10:31
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Risk Position - Eugenio Perez

Hi Sally

  Thanks for the attached.  In light of your response I think I'm after 2
things:

   1. A spec that outlines Eugenio's role, and

   2. A spec that could be used to hire a Japanese national to replace
Eugenio at the end of Eugenio's assignment in Japan.

  Hope this helps. If you could revert asap I'd appreciate it.

  Thanks

  Phil

To: Phillip -SYDNEY- Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Risk Position - Eugenio Perez

I am in London this week and have picked up your message with the
attachment.  If you could let me know what it is that you are trying to do
with this, then I will be glad to help you where I can.  Are you trying to
create  a job description to be used to search for a local candidate in
Japan?  Do you need a job description for internal purposes to create a
position on the Tokyo team?  Is this a job description that you want to use
in discussions that we may have with Eugenio Perez in a start up role for the
risk books?  These three options would all require slightly different
descriptions of the role, so it would be helpful to know how you will use
this.

Please let me know and I will be glad to work on this for you.


From a legal standpoint, they did not raise any new arguments - basically
they state that our turning back the universities is costing the states
money.  Everything depends on whether the  judge is likely to rule
politically or legally.  As you know, we did not force the state to buy
power  for customers - they decided to do so themselves.   If you like, I
will send you a copy of the brief.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/11/2001 10:56 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Attorney General May File Amicus in UC Case Against Enron

Thanks.  Any view on the likelihood that the brief will have weight?
Best,
Jeff

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	04/11/2001 10:51 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, MDay@GMSSR.com@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Attorney General May File Amicus in UC Case Against Enron

Jeff, this was filed last week.  The hearing is this morning. We are waiting
for a report from Bob and  Mike, who are in SF.  The Asst AG  may be arguing
at the hearing today.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/11/2001 10:41 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, MDay@GMSSR.com
cc:
Subject: Attorney General May File Amicus in UC Case Against Enron

Sue Mara (who's having computer problems today) just informed me that she's
heard a rumor floating around that Lockyear (sp?), the CA Attorney General,
or someone from his office, will file an amicus brief with the court today
supporting UC's action against us.  We'll try to get more info and report
back.  Vicki/Mike/Bob:  I'm assuming that you folks and/or our attorney's
will be there, so we'll get the details of any such appearance by the AG.

Best,
Jeff


Guys, attached you will find a preliminary agenda for the 2000 ENA Offsite.
As leaders of the organization, you have been invited to participate in a two
day offsite where business 2001 objectives and strategies for ENA will be
discussed.  It is scheduled to occur December 14th and 15th at the Venetian
in Las Vegas.

This is the forum to ensure that your point of view and ideas can be heard
and incorporated into our plans and iniatives as such I would encourage
everyone to attend and to stay for the entire period.  In particular, we
would like everyone to stay over Friday night and leave Saturday morning.

ENA public relations (Dorie) will manage all the logistics including air fare.

Final invitations, details and agenda will follow shortly.

Regards
Dave and John


http://www.epinions.com/hmgd-Home_Furnishings-Mattresses-All
Mo Elafandi
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0407
Portland, OR 97204
503-464-5106
Fax 503-464-7376
Cellular 503-860-8564


I can't imagine what she'd be doing with him.  Maybe we are going to acquire
a company with a decent analyst program!!

R

Gabriel Monroy
03/05/2001 04:20 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your friend

your friend Charlene just met with Tim. I don't know why.


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           09/26/2000 09:53 AM

To: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals not in Nomination - October, 2000

Vance,

The following deals are active but not in your nomination for October, 2000:

Counterparty Name  Meter #  Deal #

Aransas Drilling   9645  130880
Cokinos Natural Gas  9676  279659
James C. Freeman  5547  133168
GSF Energy   6353  138841
HESCO Gathering  6392  93487
North Central   0071  138550
Prime Operating  6388  362921
Shoreline Gas   6722  166395
Spinnaker Exploration  9848  379424

Please advise if the above deals should still be active.  Thanks.

Bob


Travis C. McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3882A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax:      (713) 646-3393/3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hodgson, Stephen" <shodgson@velaw.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hodgson+2C+20Stephen+22+20+3Cshodgson+40velaw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:31 PM
To:	Mccullough, Travis
Subject:	Redline

 <<Redline.rtf>>
 The following files have been attached to this email by DeltaView...

Redline.rtf  ( Rich Text Format )
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - Redline.rtf