Below is the text of recommendations taken from the summary of
recommendations in the Cheney Energy Report being released later this morning
that focus on coal and coal-related issues, including environmental.

"The NEPD Group (National Energy Policy Development) recommends that the
President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to propose multi-pollutant legislation.  The NEPD Group recommends that
the President  direct the EPA Administrator to work with Congress to propose
legislation that would establish a flexible, market-based program to
significantly reduce and cap emissions fo sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides,
and mercury from electric power generators.  Such a program (with appropriate
measures to address local concerns) would provide significant public health
benefits even as we increase electricity supplies.

 Establish mandatory reduction targets to emissions of three main pollutants:
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury.

 Phase in reductions over a reasonable period of time, similar to the
successful acid rain reduction program established by the 1990 amendments to
 the Clean Air Act.

 Provide regulatory certainty to allow utilities to make modifications to
their plants without fear of new litigation.

 Provide market-based incentives, such as emissions trading credits to help
achieve the required reductions."

"The NEPD Group recognizes the importance of looking to technology to help us
meet the goals of increasing electricity generation while protecting our
environment.  To that end, the NEPD Group  recommends that the President
direct the Department of Energy to continue to develop advanced clean coal
technology by:

 Investing $2 billion over 10 years to fund research in clean coal
technologies.

 Supporting a permanent extension of the existing research and development
tax credit.

 Directing federal agencies to explore regulatory approaches that will
encourage advancements in environmental technology.

"The NEPD Group recomemnds that the President direct federal agencies to
provide greater regulatory certainty relating to coal electricity generation
through clear policies that are easily applied to business decisions."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy
and other relevant agencies, to review New Source Review regulations,
including administrative interpretations and implementation, and report to
the President within 90 days on the impact of the regulations on investment
in new utility and refinery generation capacity, energy efficiency, and
environmental protection."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Attorney General to
review existing enforcement actions regarding New Source Review to ensure
that the enforcement actions are consistent with the Clean Air Act and its
regulations."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct federal agencies to
support continued research into global climate change; continue efforts to
identify environmentally and cost-effective ways to use market mechanisms and
incentives; continue development of new technologies; and cooperate with
allies, including through international processes, to develop technologies,
market-based incentives, and other innovative approaches to address the issue
of global climate change.


Attached please find a name change for Western Area Power Administration's
Phoenix Area Office.  This is a branch office for the US Department of
Energy.  There is no documentation for this change.

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT tomorrow, 04/20/01.

Records will be inactivated on Tue, May 1.

Please call with any questions or concerns.

Thanks,

Cheryl x33103


aol adress at home is jtholt1122@aol.com.  We are going to buy a camera-I'll
let you know when we get it.  Joe is going to deliver some of Grady's cars to
his new house.  I told him to take pictures for us.


Group,

If the ISO hits a stage I emergency any time on 7/4 or 7/5, please submit supplemental energy bids (at $91) immediately for any generation that is not already sold.  Generation that's not already prescheduled is as follows:

7/4
80mw, HE1-24, HRBGN_7_UNITS
17mw, HE1-24, HRBGN_7_PL2X3

7/5
80mw, HE1-6, 23-24, HRBGN_7_UNITS
17mw, HE1-24, HRBGN_7_PL2X3

Also, please try to buy-back HE7-11 on 7/5.  We sold for $88.50, so if you can buy-back 80mw in the market for less than $88.50 please do so.  Please stay in contact with the control room regarding output of the unit.

Thanks,
Stan


I will be in the office all week.  Let me know when you guys would like to
stop by

hunter


Hi Folks,

Getting lots of email on Ricky Williams.   Here's the latest from our friend
Bob Harris of the www.tflreport.com.

Joe

//////////////////////////////////////

SAINTS EXPECT WILLIAMS TO START AND PLAY AS USUAL...
Posted Thursday December 20, 2001 @ 23:30 PT

According to reports out of New Orleans, Saints running back Ricky Williams,
who is listed as questionable after coming out of Monday night's loss to the
Rams with a hairline fracture to a rib, practiced without difficulty
Thursday and head coach Jim Haslett expects him to start and play as usual
against the Buccaneers this weekend.

In fact, New Orleans Times-Picayune reporter Jeff Duncan wrote on Thursday,
"Williams was upgraded from questionable to probable and is expected to play
Sunday. He practiced Wednesday and Thursday and will wear a protective wrap
on his ribs Sunday. ..."

Duncan further noted that New Orleans' offense, led by Williams' rushing and
a resurgent Aaron Brooks in the passing game, is overshadowed by the
defense, but the unit is on pace to put together the most prolific season in
club history. The Saints currently rank sixth in the league in total offense
(355.1 yards per game) and are well ahead of pace to set a new single-season
club record for total yardage in a season.

If they can average 338 yards a game in the final three outings, they'll
break the 1979 mark of 5,627 yards.

************* Our View *******************

This is good news but certainly, we're not without concern here.   Their are
really a couple of worries here.  First, you're concerned with re-injury.
He may feel good now but one tough shot and it could be a whole new issue.
Not saying the Bucs are a team that plays dirty, but you can bet a hard
hitter like John Lynch smells blood in the water.   Secondly, you worry
about Deuce McAllister.   He's shown some big play flashes and could steal
time.   Thirdly, you have to be a little concerned with coach Jim Haslett
and the success of the passing game.   Williams has seemed to be taking a
somewhat reduced role of late.   Part of that could be getting into a track
meet with St. Louis Monday night.   All in all, the news is good for
Williams compared to what it was earlier this week.   But he is not without
concerns.   Although to be fair, few players are without concerns at this
point in the season.

Just wanting to pass along what we're hearing.   Thanks Bob.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Has this been signed and sent to Microsoft?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Bolender, Corinna
Cc: Jones, Tana
Subject: Re: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Corinna -

I have looked at the attached.  It is fine.  I will be printing two originals
for Net Works' signature.  I'll have them sent down for signature so that
they can then be sent to Microsoft.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate 05/31/2001 05:26 PM 	   To: Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc: Charles Brewer/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Opalko/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Ogg/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate,
jammo@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate, schang@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
rpierce@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate  Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1
JDP MOU

Mark,

Can you please review the changes made by Susan Chang at Microsoft to the SQL
2000 SP1 JDP MOU for our Unify application.  Bob Ward is out of the office
until June 4th, and this application is going into production on June 11th.
We need to ensure the MOU is finalized and signed prior to going into
production so that we can receive the appropriate support from Microsoft when
we go live.

If you need to contact Susan her telephone number is 425-703-6394.  Her email
is schang@microsoft.com.

Thanks for your immediate attention to this matter,
Corinna Bolender
Desk: 713-345-4388
Cell:   512-632-4285

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "James Morris" <jammo@microsoft.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22James+20Morris+22+20+3Cjammo+40microsoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Corinna Bolender; Bolender, Corinna; Ward, Bob
Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Bob and Corinna,
Here are the versions of the MOU your lawyer will need to review.  As
expected, some of the items just did not make the bar to warrant a
change.  Specifically:
an actual date for the released product will not go on the MOU.
Customers who particpate in the JDP have a high degree of touch and
disclosure with MS.  Although we are glad to discuss dates and they draw
near with the customer we do not promise anything from the beginning
(though this hardly matters now considering the date).
The line in #4 that was cut and pasted to #17 has been placed back in
#4.  This is due to the placement of the topic in #4.  The rest of #17,
specifically stating that there is NO COST TO THE CUSTOMER has been left
in on #17, and I'll probably incorporate this for future use.  It is a
good addition.
#10 on Microsoft's section has been removed.  It is clearly rednundant
and not necessary.  We already say there is absolutely no cost to the
customer.

If this is agreeable (I have included the red lined version, so your
lawyers can review), the final version with those changes have also been
included.  Please print, sign and return.

Thanks!
JamMo!

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Chang (LCA)
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:06 PM
To: James Morris
Cc: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: REVISED: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

James - per our phone call this afternoon, I've revised the MOU.
Attached is the redlined version as well as the final doc.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.

Susan

-----Original Message-----
From: James Morris
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: FW: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Susan,
I would like to permanently modify our MOU to the following for our
Joint Development Programs.  It is redlined, so you can review the exact
changes.  This is actually from the customer, but I like what they
changed and added, I just want to be certain that it's not going to come
back and bite me later.  Roughly 4 or 5 sentenced.
Thanks for you help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Bob [mailto:Bob.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 8:49 AM
To: James Morris
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Hi, James.  I've attached a copy of the MOU which contains some minor
changes suggested by one of our attorneys.  Let me know what you think.
Thank you.

 <<JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc>>

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

 - JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc << File: JDP MOU
02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc >>
 - SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc << File: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc >>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 4, 2001 5:00pm through May 7, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:       ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EBS
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/5/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CGMP removal on MSFCs (EBS)
Environments Impacted:  EBS
Purpose: Possible fix for multicast problems. Neal Symms is still reporting
difficulties with multicast and Tibco.
Backout: Place 'ip cgmp' back on the interfaces
Contact(s):  Dennis McGough    713-345-3143

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Here they are, just in case....

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:12 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ NP 15/SP 15 Electricity Price Index

 <<NP 15 pages.xls>>  <<SP 15 pages.xls>>

 - NP 15 pages.xls
 - SP 15 pages.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:25:53 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ COB Electricity Price Index

 - Cob.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:00 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ Mid-Columbia Electricity Price Index

 - MidC.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:25:56 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ Palo Verde Electricity Price Index

 - Palo.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:05 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ MeadMarketplace

 - MeadMktplace (2).xls


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041120.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 20 / Preferred:  10.99 / Final:  10.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Matt:

Moe had suggested waiting on rescheduling the conference call until a
non-disclosure agreement is signed with Hewlett Packard.  I have just
forwarded the non-disclosure framework from HP to you and Patrick Tucker.
Once I hear back from Ravi on this question, we'll let you know.

Thanks.

Sarah-Joy Hunter
Global Strategic Sourcing
Business Development
#(713)-345-6541
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah-Joy Hunter/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Matt Harris@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
12/07/2000 11:16 AM
To: Sarah-Joy Hunter/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Moe Barbarawi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Patrick
Tucker/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Peter
Goebel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sally Slaughter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Re: Hewlett Packard/Enron Conference call regarding STORAGE SERVICES
12/7 at 10 AM CST CANCELLED

Lets make this happen ASAP.

If Ravi is not available - how about Raj or Moe.

Thanks
Matt

	Sarah-Joy Hunter@ENRON
	12/06/00 04:39 PM

		 To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Patrick
Tucker/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Matt Harris/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, gerry_cashiola@hp.com,
chris_roberson@hp.com, randy_smith@hp.com, Moe Barbarawi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Peter Goebel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jennifer Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Slaughter/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, greg_pyle@hp.com, bill_lovejoy@hp.com
		 Subject: Hewlett Packard/Enron Conference call regarding STORAGE SERVICES
12/7 at 10 AM CST CANCELLED

Conference call participants:

At Ravi Thuraisingham's request due to an unanticipated business trip, the
conference call regarding storage initiatives set for 12/7 at 10 AM CST has
been cancelled.  As soon as Ravi proposes an alternative time, we will
reschedule the conference call.

Sarah-Joy Hunter
#(713)-345-6541
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah-Joy Hunter/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
06:36 PM ---------------------------

Sarah-Joy Hunter
11/30/2000 05:45 PM
To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Patrick
Tucker/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Matt Harris/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, gerry_cashiola@hp.com,
chris_roberson@hp.com, randy_smith@hp.com, Moe Barbarawi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Peter Goebel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jennifer Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Slaughter/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, greg_pyle@hp.com, bill_lovejoy@hp.com

Subject: Hewlett Packard/Enron Conference call regarding STORAGE SERVICES
12/7 at 10 AM CST

A conference call regarding STORAGE SERVICES will be held Thursday, December
7th from 10-11AM CST.  Please note the conference call in and passcode
numbers below.

 Ravi Thuraisingham, Director, Enron Broadband Services (EBS) will lead
discussions regarding EBS' storage initiatives and Chris Roberson, Hewlett
Packard Storage Solutions Architect, will lead HP storage solutions
discussions.  Matt Harris, Vice President, EBS and Patrick Tucker, Manager,
EBS are leading the origination efforts between HP and Enron.

Conference Call Dial Up Number:  1-800-991-9019
Passcode #:  6835918 #  (Note:  the # sign must be input after the passcode)

Subsequent to the conference call, future meetings and strategy on Enron/HP
storage initiatives will be decided.
Please call if any questions or agenda changes

Sarah-Joy Hunter
Enron Corporation
Global Strategic Sourcing, Business Development
#(713)-345-6541.


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/27/2001>, published as of 11/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Kay, this is a draft of the original that I received that was structured like
the one we used for Austin.

RDG


11 AM EST works for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MedleyB@gtlaw.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MedleyB+40gtlaw+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Krimsky, Steven; Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Conference call on Monday morning

How does sometime between 9:30 and 11:00 a.m. EST sound for you all?

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Medley, Becky (Secy-FTL-Env)
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:59 AM
> To: 'ben.jacoby@enron.com'; 'Steven.Krimsky@enron.com';
> 'kay.mann@enron.com'
> Subject: Conference call on Monday morning
>
> Please let me know your availability ASAP for a conference call with
> Debbie to discuss the Pompano and Deerfield agreements; we need to submit
> something to the City Attorney in Deerfield Beach on Monday afternoon.
>
> Rebecca C. Medley
> (954) 768-8230
> Assistant to Debbie M. Orshefsky
> and Frank Schnidman
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


Steve,

Attached is a news release of which we are quite proud.  Thought you would
find it interesting.

Please keep us in mind if we can assist your group or Enron with it's
Executive Education goals.

Best Regards,
Fred Haskett
Director, Client Relations
Rice University Executive Education
Ph: 713-348-5995
Fax: 713-348-5131
Email: fhaskett@rice.edu
Business Web Page: www.rice.edu/executive
 - jones building release 2000.doc


On the 12/11 MPR to be issued on 12/12, we will be taking a $56 million loss
on Catalytica Energy Systems.  This asset will begin trading on the open
market either Friday, 12/15 or Monday, 12/18 under the ticker CESIV.  The
potential trading range of $10 - $20 per share is disclosed in the company's
S-1.  This asset is in Raptor I and therefore this write-down will exhaust
$56 M of the remaining Raptor I capacity.

 Please call me at x3-6983 with questions.


there was a school shooting in new orleans


Been pretty busy these last couple of weeks.

Couple of weeks ago I had to go to Los Angeles on short notice.  Accordingly,
paid full price and got in first class.  It must have been a new plane
because the first class section was huge.  I sat in a chair that was like a
lazy boy chair-it had a fott recline and everything.  Also had my own pop up
TV and could watch  my choice of 4 movies.  It was truly awesome.  Can't
believe what  a small world it is. Went to lobby to get somebreakfast and
Patrick Brown was there-ended up having breakfast with him and some ohter
Sempra folks.Then I had to go to Vegas a couple of weeks ago.  Stayed at the
new Alladin Hotel.  They upgraded me to a suite.  Another great experience.
Bathroom was huge.  Big marble shower and  a  big tub that overlooked the
skyline.  Bedroom area and sitting area were nice too.  Shame I was only
there one night.

Last week was Gas Fair.  Lots of lunches and dinners. There are a lot of new
restaurants downtown that we tried out.  Yum-yum. The weather was perfect.
.  Cheri and I went to the spa and had a relaxing afternoon on the last day.
She looks great.  She said you saw her picture of Matthew. He's a cutie.
Parks was a t dinner one night-he hasn't changed-still nice as ever.  Had a
lot of fun with Frank Fields too- he hasn't changed a bit .David Livingston
was there.  He works for Cinergy but is doing east coast stuff-thank God.
Our retail group  just hired Joe Deschamps and Chris Shireman-remember them?
I bet Joe won't be there by the end of the year-I think he just wanted
someone to pay for his way back to Houston.  Just found out that Bob Shiring
went to work for Pan Canadian doing east coast stuff.

Joe's brother was in town this week-end from Montana.  He picked him up in
San Antonio so we had them all week-end .  Went down to Kemah to watch the
boats- we went there with Griff that one time.  Boy has it changed.  Tons
more stuff to do -especially for the kids.

I'm just sick over my tax bill this year.  I exercised a ton of my
options-and boy am I paying for it.  I was planning on  maybe paying $25000
but I am having to pay $47000.  Will probably be that way next year too.
Just sucks that the government takes so much.  I know I'm probably not
getting much sympathy from you but I can try.

Can't believe there was another shooting in your area last week.  Bet you are
glad your kids are almost out of school.  Can't understand how these kids
have access to all of these guns.  It's scary.

Deb and I had lunch with Julia.   She's gone from Enron now.  She did not
give us any more details about her marriage other than she got married out of
town and in am place that made it difficult to track marriage l icense.  Her
family still does not know she is married.  She is being really strange about
this whole thing. She qwon't acknowledge to anyone that she is married.  I've
given up on her.  She is almost as strange as you at times.  Luckily I have
not given up on you .

Going to Grand Cayman Islands on Thursday-plan on feeding the stingrays on
Friday-will tell you all about it.

Tell me why you are too busy to fill me in on what is happenign in your life.


I only suggest one change on page 14 which uses the more specific language
from the settlement.? I had to strain to find anything to comment on.? Looks
good to me although others from SCG may have other comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie, John [mailto:jleslie@LUCE.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 9:26 AM
To: 'Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com'; bcherry@sempra.com
Cc: Tom Beach; Rick Counihan; Paul Amirault; Mike Day; Mike Alexander;
Michael Rochman; Mark Pocta; Keith McCrea; Leslie, John; John Jimison;
Joe Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Rob Foss; Evvie Elsesser; Doug Porter; David
Bayless; Dan Douglass; Craig Chancellor; B Dingwall; Tom Dill; Jim
Fossum; Bob Shively; Wayne Sakarius; Tom Brill; Steve Watson; Rick
Morrow; Ralph Purves; Lad Lorenz; Jim Teeter; Jim Harrigan; Eric Nelson;
Dave Follett; Jan Van Lierop; susan.scott@enron.com;
mbaldwin@igservice.com
Subject: Core Aggregator Testimony in Support of Settlement

To All Settlement Parties:
??????? I am enclosing a draft of the prepared direct testimony of Rick
Counihan, on behalf of the core aggregators, in support of the SoCalGas
settlement.? Please direct any comments to me (John Leslie).? Thank you.
??????? ??????? -John

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619) 236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
transmission.? It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
privileges.? If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.? You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and to
return the original document to us immediately by mail at the address above.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 2:11 PM
To: bcherry@sempra.com
Cc: Tom Beach; Rick Counihan; Paul Amirault; Mike Day; Mike Alexander;
Michael Rochman; Mark Pocta; Keith McCrea; John Leslie; John Jimison;
Joe Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Rob Foss; Evvie Elsesser; Doug Porter; David
Bayless; Dan Douglass; Craig Chancellor; B Dingwall; Tom Dill; Jim
Fossum; Bob Shively; Wayne Sakarius; Tom Brill; Steve Watson; Rick
Morrow; Ralph Purves; Lad Lorenz; Jim Teeter; Jim Harrigan; Eric Nelson;
Dave Follett; Jan Van Lierop; susan.scott@enron.com;
mbaldwin@igservice.com
Subject: Transwestern GIR Testimony

Brian,
I'm forwarding to you the first draft of Transwestern's GIR testimony.? As
you can see, there are several holes yet to be filled in, particularly with
respect to cites/references.? However, as concerns content, I'd appreciate
any comments/proposed changes anyone would like to offer here.? I'm not
sure if I have the latest Email distribution list, so please feel free to
forward this on to anyone I've inadvertently left off.? Thanks.

(See attached file: jcftestimony.doc)

?
 - greenmountainscgcom.doc


Attached please find an updated power credit watchlist dated 12/11/00.
Please direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803

Veronica Gonzalez


=====================================================================
THE INDUSTRY STANDARD'S
M E D I A  G R O K
A Review of Press Coverage of the Internet Economy
=====================================================================
| http://www.thestandard.com |

Tuesday, December 12, 2000

TOP GROKS:
* Economists: Relax, This Won't Hurt a Bit
* Sun Hears It Through the Grapevine
* Courts Taming the Wild, Wild Web

MORE NEWS:
* Go West, Young Wharton Students

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

WANT TO PUT YOUR COMPANY ON THE E-BUSINESS MAP? List your company in The
Standard's Directory, and help shape e-business by making your offerings
available to the best minds in the Internet Economy.  And if you're
wondering which "i" company does "i" what, search the Directory's
database of over 3,000 e-businesses to find your future partners. Visit
The Standard's Directory today and make the connections you're looking
for.  http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730129

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

CORRECTION:
~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Friday's Media Grok we referred to reporter P.J. Huffstutter as
"he." Ms. Huffstutter is a "she." We regret the error.

TOP GROKS
~~~~~~~~~
Economists: Relax, This Won't Hurt a Bit

Most of us like recession speculation about as much as we like tetanus
shots. A business forecast from UCLA brought out the big needle on
Monday and predicted a 60 percent chance of the r-word in 2001. Like
your doctor, the UCLA economists said it would only pinch a little,
and then it would all be over.

CBS MarketWatch, Newsbytes and MSNBC provided good summaries of the
report, which insisted everything would be peachy again in 2002.
Newsbytes' Michael Bartlett led with some encouragement for deflated
techie egos: "The stimulus of the Internet-led 'New Economy' was
enough to keep the current economic expansion in the United States
driving forward for four years longer than it might have," he said,
paraphrasing the report. Funny how everyone's putting "new economy" in
quotes these days - it used to seem so real.

The San Jose Mercury News called the predicted downturn "recession
lite" and noted that local California readers "will escape the worst
of it." (A separate UCLA report on California put the odds of a
statewide recession at 40 percent; report author Tom Lieser prefers
the term "deceleration.") Many experts expect 3 percent growth next
year, so the Merc's Jennifer Bjorhus called other economist to compare
notes. One Bay Area econ professor agreed that we may be in trouble,
but the UCLA report "has other economists scratching their heads,"
said Bjorhus. "I don't know of anybody else that's out there that
far," said economist Richard Carlson.

We do. CBS MarketWatch columnist Paul Farrell wondered if the slump
has already arrived, citing Ken Kurson's article "Nine Signs We're
Already in a Recession" in Esquire's December issue. Kurson's thesis
made sense and "was worth the price of the magazine," but in the end,
Farrell shrugged it off. "Neither Esquire's Grinch nor the U.S.
Supreme Court is going to steal my Christmas," he wrote. If only we
could face the doctor with such self-assurance. - Jen Muehlbauer

UCLA Report's Economic Forecast: Recession Lite
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730130

UCLA's Anderson School Predicts 'Mild Recession' in 2001
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730131

UCLA Economists See U.S. Recession
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730132

U.S. Recession Looming, Study Says
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730133

Recession in 2001? It's Already Here!
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730134

Nine Signs We're Already in a Recession
Esquire (Not available online.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Sun Hears It Through the Grapevine

Didja hear the one about Sun's irregular accounting practices? Sun CFO
Michael Lehman did, but by the time he denied it, the stock had
already taken a hit. "These rumors have no basis in fact and are
false," said Lehman in an indignant (and redundant) statement released
on Monday.

The rumor said "a short-seller had published a compelling report
charging accounting irregularities," explained TheStreet.com. Finer
points were scarce, and that's probably just the way Sun spokesperson
Mark Paisley liked it. Since the gossip had no source or details,
"That should tell you about the quality of the rumor," he told
Reuters. After Lehman's official denial, Sun shares rebounded a bit in
after-hours trading, showing that some traders who believe rumors also
believe prepared corporate statements.

Accounting scuttlebutt may have been the catalyst for Friday's Sun
selloff, said TheStreet.com, "But more notable was what the
book-cooking rumor obscured: a survey from small, Chicago research
shop Off The Record Research showing slowing sales of Sun servers to
its distributors." The Financial Times also noted analyst's worries
about Sun sales, and Wall Street's concerns about Sun's ability to
spar with HP, Compaq and IBM. Suddenly, everyone's in the server biz,
and Sun's not looking so invincible anymore.

Sun did get a bit of good press this week, by helping to form an
industry group to develop online audio and video standards. Then
again, the group "is sure to create a battle for market control with
(media player companies) RealNetworks Inc. and Microsoft Corp," said
the San Jose Mercury News. We'll have to wait and see whether Sun
shares rise or set on this new development. - Jen Muehlbauer

Sun's Shares Plunge
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730135

Sun Micro Denies Accounting Rumor on Stock Slide
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730136

Sun Dims as Investors Doubt Blue-Sky Growth Projections
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730137

Sun Shares Slide on Sales Growth Concerns (Bloomberg)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730138

Cisco and Sun Teaming Up on Better Streaming Standards
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730139

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

ARE YOU READY FOR KNOWLEDGE-BASED MARKETING?
Primary Knowledge provides outsourced data warehousing and business
intelligence tools that help you focus on your most valuable customers.
We aggregate isolated silos of online data, giving you a fuller picture
of your customers. And, every morning, you are GUARANTEED access to
current intelligence and data analysis tools. So you can make decisions
based on knowledge. http://www.primaryknowledge.com?a=007008008

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

Courts Taming the Wild, Wild Web

This morning's news was peppered with court cases that collectively
reined in profane names, spam and anonymous libel on the Net.

USA Today ran an Associated Press story on a case that time and
competition have rendered moot. Adult Web-site operators had sued
Network Solutions because NSI, at the time the sole registrar of
domain names, refused to issue names the AP characterized as
"www.(pickanyobscenity).com." (Last year, competing registries began
accepting registrations for such names.) The judge ruled that domain
names are mainly about navigation, not about communicative speech. The
AP carried what amounted to a lively debate among lawyers and Internet
experts on possible reverberations from the case.

The Washington Post and CNET covered the first libel judgement won by
an individual against an anonymous online poster. The Post's story, by
Brian Krebs of Newsbytes, disentangled the complicated tale more
clearly than did CNET's AP copy. A U.S. District judge awarded
$675,000 to an Emory University professor after an anonymous poster
accused him of taking kickbacks. The poster, unmasked in the
investigation, was a former employee of the company he accused of
making the payoff. The Post provided the critical detail that that
company had fired the libeler. Krebs quoted Ari Schwartz, a policy
analyst with the Center for Democracy and Technology, for the bottom
line: "There's not much difference between saying slanderous things
online or offline. ... In terms of anonymity, it's probably much
easier to send letters in the mail."

Two different court cases recently struck blows against unsolicited
commercial e-mail. The Los Angeles Times ran an unsigned piece on a
rather typical spammer who had hijacked a company's computer to spread
millions of spams offering porn and get-rich-quick schemes. What
wasn't typical about this case is that the spammer was tracked down
and arrested. He pleaded guilty to second-degree forgery and faces up
to seven years in prison.

Wired News and InternetNews assigned reporters to the other spam case,
this one involving Web host Verio's use of "whois" customer
information from Register.com in violation of the registrar's
acceptable-use policy. The case has not yet gone to trial, but a
federal judge ordered Verio to stop using the whois data to barrage
Register.com's customers by e-mail, phone and mail. Writing for
InternetNews, Clint Boulton detailed the judge's order and talked to
outside experts on the possible effects of the judge's order. Boulton
quoted a Washington lawyer who emphasized the b-to-b aspect of the
tussle: "What this case does is go further in protecting the
relationships a business has with its customers." - Keith Dawson

Judge Rules Against Profane Web Domains (AP)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730141

Professor Wins Net Libel Suit
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730142

Doctor Awarded $675,000 in Net Libel Case (AP)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730143

Computer Hijacker Pleads Guilty
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730144

Verio's Alleged Spam Is Temporarily Canned
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730145

Judge Blocks Whois Spam
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730146

/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= advertisement =-=-=\

NEW PRODUCTS AND SEMINARS FROM HEWLETT PACKARD
Hewlett Packard's thinking ahead. Are you? See what's on the horizon
and what it'll mean to your business in arenas like e-services,
Always-On Infrastructure, and Internet appliances. For the calendar of
events regarding New Product Introductions and other details about
hp's services, go to:
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?H2655997803X931346

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

MORE NEWS AT THESTANDARD.COM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Go West, Young Wharton Students
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730148

Online Grocery Fails in Hong Kong
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730149

Signs of Telecom Life
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730150

CEOs Who Got Rich on a Niche
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730151

DoubleClick Will Miss the Mark
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730152

---------------------------------------------------------------------

MORE LINKS
~~~~~~~~~~
New Jersey Probes Toysrus.com (AP)
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730153

Federal Probe of Commissions Focuses on 1999 VA Linux Deal
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730154
(Paid subscription required.)

Police Investigating Alleged PlayStation 2 Supplier Scam
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730155
(Registration required.)

Movement to Impeach Philippine President Accelerated by New Technology
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730156

Ellison Insists Oracle Remains Strong Despite Defections
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730157

EBay's Half.com to Buy Deja.com's Technology
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730158
(Paid subscription required.)

Sixdegrees Separates Itself From Web
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730159

Amazon, Employees Joust Over Union Effort
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730160

Google Product Tracker Could Raise Privacy Concerns
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730161

Net Monitoring Service Pays Users
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730162

NASA-Led Coalition Aims to Create Crash-Free Computers
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730163

Design for Quantum Computer Proposed
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730164

High-Tech Solutions to a Low-Tech Problem: Catching the Bus
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730165

STAFF
~~~~~
Written by Deborah Asbrand (dasbrand@world.std.com), Keith Dawson
(dawson@world.std.com), Michelle Goldberg (michelle@shift.com), Jen
Muehlbauer (jen@englishmajor.com) and David Sims (davesims@sonic.net).

Edited by Jimmy Guterman (guterman@vineyard.com).

Copyedited by Jim Duffy (jduffy@thestandard.com).

GET THE MAGAZINE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4 RISK-FREE issues at this URL:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730166

GET MORE NEWSLETTERS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Industry Standard newsletters cover the media, stock market,
e-commerce, music, law and more. Enter your e-mail address at the
following URL and select the newsletters you wish to receive:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730167

To UNSUBSCRIBE to any newsletters, log in at the following URL and
select the newsletters you wish to cancel:
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730168

GET MORE NEWS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Go to http://www.thestandard.com for more coverage on the Internet
Economy. Media Grok does not review stories from any IDG
publication, but includes relevant links to TheStandard.com and
IDG.net.

ADVERTISING INFORMATION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For more information on advertising in The Industry Standard
Newsletters, contact:

West Coast
Connie Elliott (mailto:celliott@thestandard.com)

East Coast
Norma Wesolowski (mailto:normaw@thestandard.com)

FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Send letters to the editor to letters@thestandard.com.

Please contact us with any problems that arise.
http://tm0.com/thestandard/sbct.cgi?s=64349541&i=284481&d=730169

You can also contact us via phone or mail:
The Industry Standard, Customer Service
(402) 293-0386 (phone)
(402) 293-0794 (fax)

The Industry Standard, Production
315 Pacific Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 733-5400 (main)
(415) 733-5401 (fax)

Copyright 2000 The Industry Standard


Mark

As you are aware, I reviewed the proposed Canadian Power Master and have been
speaking to Greg Johnston about various issues.  The Canadian Master is based
upon EEI but has been "retyped" making changes based upon variations in the
way US power has evolved from that of the Canadian master gas contract (the
basis for a number of the differences from EEI) , operational distinctions,
differences in product and jurisdictional issues.  EEI has called me and
stated that they want to attend a meeting on November 9th  in Ontario to
advocate the use of the EEI form in Canada.   Peter Keohane, I know, wants
the form he and Greg prepared to be the model Canadian form for all the
reasons he stated in his email to you.  Do you think I should set up a
meeting with you, Jeff Hodge, Peter K., Greg J. and myself to discuss.  At
that time, we could also discuss the significant "policy differences" to make
sure that everybody knows what is going on and that there are good reasons
for the differences.

Thanks
Elizabeth
36349


Shona,

Could you or someone in your group provide us with a summary of the last
month's issues? It would be helpful to see trends in order to to track
improvements. and to get an overall feel for where we should focus our
efforts.

If you agree, let's just plan to have the summary for next week's meeting
with Rick and Sally.

Thanks,

Debbie

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 11:28 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, James
New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: weekly log

Now that we have moved away from the daily problems to fixing procedures and
processes, I am no longer summarizing weekly info, but will continue to track
the daily problems and send these to you daily.  Let me know if you ever need
a summary and I will prepare one for you.

Thanks

Shona


Michael (or Mike..what do you like to be called?),

My schedule is open Thursday afternoon 1-5pm and Friday 1-4pm.  Let me know
the what works best for you.  Earlier in the afternoon is usually best for me.

Daren


Chip is assigned to North America primarily but we asked him to get up to
speed on the India situation in case a new deal should arise there that
requires RAC input. He is a sharp guy with lots of project finance experience
and also worked in London for Eastern.  If you don't want him involved and a
transaction arises it will be difficult to get someone up to speed quickly,
given the complexities. Rick


fyi...

-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:04 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: LANHAM COMPRESSOR STATION

                      COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 26, 2001

Notice ID: 3217
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

The turbine at Lanham Compressor Station is out of service due to unexpected
maintenance.  A return to service date of mid November is anticipated.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact your Customer Services
Representative.


put in rolodex

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Burns, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Vince Kaminski's home info.

Vince Kaminski
10 Snowbird Place
Woodlands, TX 77381
281-367-5377

Jennifer Burns
Executive Assistant to Jeff Shankman
Enron Global Markets, LLC


Sabrae,

See if you can find Danny's deal book and verify the price for the deal listed below.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:09 PM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Duke Energy Field Services 4/01

For once his is not a Panenergy question.  For sale deal 707274, DEFS says the price on 4/4 should be 5.25 and we have 5.20 in Sitara.  Can you confirm this price for me?

Megan


5.85% Fixed Rate       Rates Have Fallen Again!!!  DO NOT MISS OUT!!  LET BANKS COMPETE FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!  ALL CREDIT WELCOME    CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO

Visit our website here to be removed .


Hi Ben,

I got an opinion from outside counsel.  I'll give it a look so we can
discuss.  I'll move it up on the list.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/16/2001 04:03 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Meeting to Discuss 501D5A Status

Kay:

We really need to get on top of the situation with the 501D5A. I believe SW
is now taking the position that the generator was delivered under the terms
of the contract, and risk of loss resided with us at the time of the "event".
I furthermore understand they are taking the position that if we want a
replacement generator, that we need to execute a change order. Kind of makes
you feel like you're getting squeezed...

At the end of the day, we've got $25 million in a CT without a generator. ENA
will get saddled with these costs if we do not find a resolution either
through a buyer or a settlement with SW.

I really hope we can focus on this in the next couple of days. FYI, both
Chris Booth and Ron Tapscott have been drafted on this effort.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 02:49 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           01/16/2001 03:48 PM

To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting to Discuss 501D5A Status

Please attend a meeting at 1:00 PM on Wednesday, 17 January 2001 in EB3143c
to discuss the latest status of the Westinghouse 501D5A Generator set.

Please let me know ASAP if you are unable to attend.

Thanks,

Chris Booth


Just a quick note to thank all of you for allowing me the opportunity to
interview for the Market Research  position in the Middle Marketing Group.
After interviewing for the position I still remain very interested in the
possibility of becoming a valuable asset to your team.   Once again thank you
for the opportunity.


For 10 am PDT call
-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Plotkin [mailto:nplotkin@rcsis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:46 AM
To: arem@electric.com
Subject: FW: Retroactive Suspension - SDG&E's message

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:03 PM
To: Weller, Andrea; arem@electric.com; 'Norman Plotkin'
Subject: Re: Retroactive Suspension - SDG&E's message

It would be surprising if the Commission did what SDG&E is suggesting.  From a strictly legal perspective, it is unlikely that the Commission would vote to suspend direct access retroactively.  Although an argument could be put forward that the Commission has the authority to do so, such an act could be challenged on U.S. Constitutional grounds as being violative of the Contracts Clause.  Moreover, from a practical perspective, retroactive suspension would be politically unpalatable and cause a good deal of protest from affected parties.  However, the Commission might choose to so regardless of these factors, due to political pressure from Sacramento to ensure the saleability of the power revenue bonds.

The Commission has frequently reserved to itself the power to modify existing contracts, particularly those entered into by utilities subject to its jurisdiction.  It has exercised this right often, using as justification wording contained in utility contracts that make the agreements subject to the Commission's continuing jurisdiction, including such modifications as it may direct.  For example, the standard ESP Service Agreement used by all three of the state's electric utilities provides that, "This Agreement may be subject to such changes or modifications as the CPUC may from time to time direct or necessitate in the exercise of its jurisdiction, and the Parties may amend the Agreement to conform to changes directed or necessitated by the CPUC."  This phraseology is typically referred to by the state's utilities as a "regulatory out" clause.

However, this sort of wording has not been required to be included in the contracts entered into by ESPs, as the Commission does not regulate these entities.  ESPs that plan to offer electric services to residential and small commercial customers must fulfill certain registration requirements, as adopted by the Commission in Decisions (D.) 99-05-034 and D.98-03-072 in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 394(b).  However, ESPs who serve larger customers are not even subject to this registration requirement.  Most importantly, ESP terms and conditions of service are not subject to regulation by the Commission.  Therefore, the regulatory out language cited above is not customarily included in standard contracts signed between ESPs and their customers.

The absence of a regulatory out clause would make Commission efforts to modify retroactively contracts entered into between ESPs and their customers extremely suspect.  This is due to the fact that such action could be seen as violative of Section 10 of Article I of the United States Constitution.  It provides in part that, "No State shall . . .  pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts . . ." [Emphasis added]

Under the Supreme Court's Contracts Clause jurisprudence, the threshold inquiry is, "whether the state law has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship."  Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus, 438 U.S. 234, 244 (1978).  "This inquiry has three components:  whether there is a contractual relationship, whether a change in law impairs that contractual relationship, and whether the impairment is substantial."  General Motors Corporation v. Romein, 503 U.S. 181, 186 (1992).

The Contracts Clause only applies to contracts that exist at the time of the law's passage.  Also, the Contracts Clause has been deemed to apply both to legislation or other government action, but not to court decisions.  The judiciary has the power to invalidate a contract without violating the Contracts Clause.  See Tidal Oil v. Flanagan, 263 U.S. 444 (1924).  In a case involving a private contract, the law or governmental action must substantially impair a pre-existing contractual relationship.  Once this hurdle is met, the government must demonstrate that the law imposes reasonable conditions appropriate to achieving a significant and legitimate public purpose.  Often, when faced with such an issue, the courts defer to the legislative judgment.  However, this does not prevent an independent investigation of the relevant factual situation.

This is probably far more than you wanted to know.....just wanted to give a quick overview on the subject.  Bottom line:  CPUC would be dumb to suspend retroactively, at least from a legal perspective.  On the other hand, when has brilliance been a hallmark of recent decisions from this Commission?

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Weller, Andrea" < AWeller@sel.com <mailto:AWeller@sel.com>>
To: < arem@electric.com <mailto:arem@electric.com>>; "'Norman Plotkin'" < nplotkin@rcsis.com <mailto:nplotkin@rcsis.com>>; "'Dan Douglass'" < douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: Retroactive Suspension - SDG&E's message

> All -
>
> SDG&E is sending the following message to customers...
> "The California Public Utilities Commission is now expected to make a
> decision at their September 6 meeting regarding suspension of direct access.
> This decision could be retroactive to September 1, 2001.
> Based on this information, if you are considering a contract with an energy
> service provider for your electric commodity, the contract would need to be
> signed by August 31, 2001. "
> What do you all think about this?  What SDG&E is saying is inconsistent with
> the intent of the statement made in the most recent ALJ Barnett Resolution
> which states, "In the interest of fairness, written contracts for direct
> access signed before Sept. 1, 2001 are exempt from suspension".  The intent
> here being that the CPUC will make a prospective ruling in the interest of
> fairness.
> I would appreciate any thoughts on this.  Thank you!
>
>
> Andrea Weller
> Market Strategist
> Strategic Energy, LLC
> 949.230.3404
> aweller@sel.com <mailto:aweller@sel.com>


Here is the latest investor list.  Please update and send back.  Thanks
Ben


I spoke with Chris, and he said this deal is in the system. He didn't know
the deal number off the top of his head, but he said Constellation is aware
of it. Would you like me to research further? Or does everything look okay
from your end now? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/22/2000 11:46 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Constellation Deal

hey kate,

if this is not taken care of, would you mind following up on it.
constellation called and is inquiring on a deal that goes with deal 459996
done through prebon.  there should be another done around dec 1 with no
broker, buy constellation, jan 01, 100 mw, np 15, index + 3.00.  this deal is
not in the system as far as i know.  i spoke with chris mallory about this
situation and i have not heard from him yet.  so that is why i am emailing
you, i will be out until jan 2, and i just wanted to make sure someone
follows up on it.  (i think it should be jeff richters deal, but he is out
also).

my contact at constellation is tom moleatt, 410-468-3620.  i am also copying
stephanie on this, so she can be your contact here.  hope it is not too
confusing, but chris knows about this, unless it will already be taken care
of by the time you return.

thanks!


Please review with regards to changes in MOCK test plans tomorrow for processing ETX deals:

Location:  We are moving the location from the 25th flloor labs to ECS 05442
    -> ECS 05442 (near Dermott color printer sign; center of room
    -> We will have 8 computers.  Faster response time with technical staff.
We prefer if you can test at the location above.  If you are working from your office location, please contact the bridgeline to check in and report progress.

Timeframe:  Moving it up, starting at 9am, and completion at 3pm

Bridgeline will be up for issues.
    -> Bridge line open - 800-711-8000, code #3454709

Results from Wednesday's review meeting of testing data:
1) The counterparty/ pipeline list is updated as discussed (attached).  Contracts will be created for the pipelines.
2) We will provide EOL (ETX) the counterparty data desired, and work with them to ensure it's created.
    -> ETX will also provide us id's to create data as needed.
3) Matt Pena is working to create forward prices for March 2002
4) ETX will create for GasDaily current/ future months

Please participate for your planned tasks (attached), and please be available for questions/ issues as needed!

Thanks in advance for your help!

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)


fyi
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 02:38 PM -----

	Mary Nell Browning
	04/04/2001 01:59 PM

		 To: James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/Enron@EnronXGate,
Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claire Wright/LON/ECT@ECT,
Raj N Patel - Tax/LON/ECT@ECT, Rex Rogers/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Richard Harper/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Turner/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CATS litigation

Disappointingly, the House of Lords ruled 5 - 0 against Enron in the CATS
litigation today.  This will mean that we will repay to the CATS parties
approximately $150 million plus interest and court costs, putting the final
figure at an estimated $155-160 million.  We expect to be invoiced for the
principal amount in the next week or so; sorting costs and interest may take
as long as 60 days.  The written opinion reflects a determination on the part
of the Lords to rule against us regardless of what the contract says.  The
opinion seeks to conclude "what rational businessmen could have intended"
rather than applying the provisions of the contract.

For example, Lord Hoffman (author of the primary opinion) makes it clear that
the  "retrospective consequences" of discovering a latent defect after
payments have been made (and would therefore need to be refunded) are
unacceptable.  His view seems to be that because we were not ready to flow
J-Block gas during the period of the T-6 leak, we are not damaged and
therefore not entitled to relief under the contract.  Furthermore, he says
that the Commencement Date notice sent by the CATS parties was in the nature
of a declaration and as long as it is sent in good faith it is effective.

As far as the price reduction formula in Clause 7.5, Lord Hoffman opines that
the clause is not operative until TGTL had tied in the J-Block field.  The
contract makes no reference to this requirement.  Hoffman's view is that it
is only upon tie-in that the CATS parties' obligation to provide the
Transportation Service is triggered and therefore there can be no price
reduction for not providing the service unless tie-in is complete. This
statement is in stark contrast with Hoffman's earlier statement in the
opinion that upon the giving of the Commencement Date notice the CATS parties
have an absolute obligation to provide the Transportation Service.

Equally disappointing and surprising is the fact that the Lords rejected our
submission for reimbursement of our costs incurred in connection with the
restitution issue.  As you may recall, restitution was the primary issue upon
which the CATS parties obtained leave to appeal, and they conceded the point
at the commencement of the hearing.  Reimbursement of these costs should have
been a given.

Although I have not yet been able to speak to our most senior barrister, our
other counsel have assessed the opinion as "appalling" and "pathetic," and
describe the situation as one where Enron has been "stitched up".
Unfortunately, given that this is the court of last resort in this country
(except of course the Court of Human Rights), there is not an avenue for
recourse.

In conclusion may I say that although we did not get the result we wanted or
expected from the House of Lords, I very much appreciate all the support from
each of you for these past six years.  The case has been a roller coaster
ride;  I hope our earlier victory in the Court of Appeal will evidence in
fact that some tribunals in this country recognize that we did get it right.

Please call me if you wish to discuss the case in any further detail, or if
you wish to have a copy of the opinion.  My telephone number is 011 44 207
783 6582.  Many thanks.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 06:12 PM -----

	Tracy Ngo
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mark.taylor@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Merrill Lynch assignment to Allegheny

I'm waiting on Merrill to verify the transactions.  I will advise.  Thanks.
I'm already working with Joe Hunter in financial confirms and Rhonda Denton
re. the physical power transactions.

Thanks,
Tracy

Janice R Moore
03/14/2001 02:31 PM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: William  S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mark.taylor@enron.com

Subject: Merrill Lynch assignment to Allegheny

Tracy
Just wanted to let you know that I"ll be working on the physical power side
and Sara Shackleton will be working on the ISDA side of this deal, so when
you get the info ready, you can send it to us directly.  Thanks.
Regards,
Janice

EB3811
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-3490)


Mark - attached is the litinay of certain of the things the
bankruptcy-remote entities should do from a corporate standpoint - I am
going to talk to Charles Harrell and see if we have a more detailed
memorandum based on the case-law from which these factors are derived -
Thanks.
(See attached file: Corporate Separateness Factors - Charter Language.doc)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.

 - Corporate Separateness Factors - Charter Language.doc


Thanks Rhonda.  Yes you are right, it is 55 hours.  Sorry.

Lisa
-----Original Message-----
From: Time Sheets [mailto:timesheets@iconconsultants.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:57 AM
To: lgang@enron.com
Subject:
Importance: High

Lisa,
I know you are busy. I thought I would email you, so you don't have to call me back later..

Rhonda wanted me to let you know that we are checking into the state tax question you had yesterday. She had to call Oregon Tax Commission and she is waiting for them to call her back. She said that it won't go into effect this paycheck, but we should hopefully know something soon.

Also, I wanted to clarify your hours on last week's timesheet. I am coming up with 55 hours instead of 57.

Have a good day!!
Talk to you later!

Icon Information Consultants
2424 W. Loop South
Houston, Tx 77027
713-438-0919
713-438-0930 (fax)
timesheets@iconconsultants.com <mailto:timesheets@iconconsultants.com>


Here are the NDA's.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	10/31/00 09:11 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENW NDA's to transfer from EBS

Am trying to get copies of the executed NDA's for the counterparties listed
below.  When you get this can you call me....
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 09:10 AM -----

	Dovie Keprta@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/30/2000 04:51 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENW NDA's to transfer from EBS

Clarifications...
Exodus Communications, Inc. (executed by David Berberian)
SAP - will send information shortly to get that one going.
FinancialSettlementMatrix.com - I think this is the full company name.  I
will have to clarify tomorrow, if necessary.
inwarehouse.com - I am in posession of executed NDA done through EBS (they
may not have filed their copy yet, just finished last week).  I will forward
to you if you'd like

Everything else looks great!

	Tana Jones@ECT
	10/30/00 04:03 PM

		 To: Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENW NDA's to transfer from EBS

I checked your list against the EBS list and came up with the information
below.  Can you verify the full names of the companies below.  Upon receipt,
I will request copies of existing NDA's from EBS.

Thanks!

	Dovie Keprta@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/30/2000 02:14 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENW NDA's to transfer from EBS

Tana-

Here are the companies that we are currently talking with that require an
NDA.  I believe that all of these are covered under NDA via EBS.

I assume it's common practice to have to go through this process due to our
group's move from one company to another, but have been asked by one of our
originators if there's a way to work around it;  the point being that it's an
inconvenience to the counterparty to jump through another hoop because of our
situation.

Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you!

-Dovie

Ariba, Inc. - draft sent 8/14/00
Commerce One, Inc. - bilateral executed
Exodus-need to know full name of your customer
Financial Settlement Matrix-nothing
i2 Technologies-in progress
Interliant, Inc. - draft sent 5/5/00
inwarehouse.com-nothing
Oracle Corporation - executed bilateral
Sabre Corporation - executed bilateral
SAP-nothing, need the fully name of your customer


Nick,

The airport is about 30 minutes  by cab from the office (1400 Smith).
The best hotel is either Hyatt Regency Downtown or Doubletree
Downtown (it is important to emphasize Downtown when making
reservations). The hotels are within a walking distance
from  the Enron building.

We can make reservations  for dinner around 6:30 - 7:00
in a resturant  within 10 minutes by car from the hotel.

By the way, we shall be very glad to reimburse you for the trip related
expenses.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/11/2000 05:31:53 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
Subject: Re: Visit to Enron

Vince,

Yes, that would be ideal. But let me call first my travel agent to
see if there is a flight that would satisfy all the other
constraints. What time should I be at Enron on Thursday, and how far is
the airport from your offices?

Thanks,

Nick

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> Can you come to Houston Thursday night and meet me, Stinson and
> Kevin Hannon (one of top 3 executives at Enron Broadband Services)
> for dinner?
>
> Vince
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/10/2000 10:49:46 AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
> Subject:  Re: Visit to Enron
>
> Vince,
>
> Many thanks for arranging that. Yes, Friday 05/26/00 is good.
> I'm blocking off in my calendar May 26 for the visit.
>
> Again, many thanks. I look forward to seeing you and Stinson
> in two weeks.
>
> Nick
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > Thanks for your message. The best date for a visit to Enron
> > would be Friday, May the 26th. Please, let me know if this date would
> work
> > for you.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/01/2000 04:26:30 AM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Visit to Enron
> >
> > Vince,
> >
> > How are you? Hope all is well.
> >
> > Is there any chance we can schedule my visit to Enron on Friday, May 19,
> > or Friday, May 26?
> >
> > By the end of April I was able to attract a top new student to work on
> the
> > project.
> > The other one for the coming year will be Giuseppe. By spending the
> summer
> > at Enron, he will be in a position to bring the new one up to speed and
> > create an intellectual team here at Stanford to look at these problems.
> >
> > I must move ahead soon to put the project in place and get the work
> going.
> >
> > Talk to you soon,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Nick,
> > >
> > > We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research
> projects
> > > before your visit to Enron.
> > >
> > > My assistant, Shirley  Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference
> > call
> > > with me, Stinson Gibner,
> > > and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues.
> > > Friday this week would work for
> > > both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes.
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> > > P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525
> > > (office).
> > >
> > > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM
> > >
> > > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Visit to Enron
> > >
> > > Hello Vince,
> > >
> > > It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch
> > > we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the
> > > technical level and otherwise.
> > >
> > > I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for
> > > a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was
> > > clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule -
> > > mine is rather terrible:
> > >
> > > Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter
> > > Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron
> > > to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to
> > > visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in
> > > Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays.
> > >
> > > Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably
> > > is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within
> > > a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
> > > research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be
> > > important for the student support funds to be in place then, so
> > > that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top
> > > talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have
> > > approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft
> > > commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its
> > > potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought
> > > after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this
> > > competition.
> > >
> > > Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the
> > > project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the
> > > end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can
> > > happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May.
> > > I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
> > > going. Please let me know what you think.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Nick


Deal excluded on Services desk on the original version and ST  SW desk was adjusted differently.

Please see me if you have any questions.

Thanks

Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297


Hey girl,

What's going on?  It is truly a slow day over here.  So far, I really could have taken the day off and would not have missed anything.  Last night I had a date with my mother-in-law.  She's a member of a book club and they had their 3rd annual literary Gala last night at the Omni Hotel.  It was nice, but long.  The tickets said it started at 6:00 and I got their at 6:00.  The doggone ticket should have said cocktails at 6:00 and seating at 6:45.  I was tired of standing around waiting to be seated.  But, girl, Ms Thang felt so good last night.  I felt like a million dollars in my semi-formal attire.  After I left church, I went to one of my favorite stores, Chico's, and bought myself a nice dressy top to go with my floor length (not by design, I'm just not tall enough) black skirt.  The top that I bought set it off so nicely.  It was black, light brown and gold!  I wore my rhinestone choker and my rhinestone big hoop earrings, not the ones I wear all the time, but a new pair, much mo' flashy and my black high heel sandals that show all my foot.  Boy, I felt good about my appearance.  When I came out of the bedroom after getting dressed, Jordan said "Mommy.......you look pretty.  Made my evening.  Of course, Bozo the husband, didn't say one word.  But I felt good, I even had Jordan take some pictures of me, so we'll see how those come out (smile).

We have severe plumbng problems I discovered when I got back home, Todd said the septic tank is stopped up, I have no idea what that really entails, but it must of been ugly.  He was pissed!

Looking forward to rehearsal tomorrow night, speaking of rehearsal, I was wondering where Samantha had been, and Poiter told me yesterday that she's back in school, so that's why she's hasn't been there.

How did your evening go last night?  We still need to talk, maybe we'll get a chance to visit tonight.  Todd already said he wasn't going to be home until around 11:00 p.m. on Mon, Tues, or Wed, of this week, due to Power Mart.  I said fine, have fun.  I am so bitter, I'm ready for a change too.  Right now, it doesn't seem like me and the boys would be missing much.  All we do is coordinate our schedules to see when we can schedule different, independent, activities.  Plus, I'm ready for a new house, clean break and new environment.

Oh well, talk with you later!

Thanking you in advance for disregarding any and all typos!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Hello

Hi Tricey!!  How is your day going so far?  Fine, I hope.  I've been
extremely busy.  I'm glad it's Friday.  Well, Siera received her report
card yesterday and it's not good.  I've almost cried myself into sickness.
I don't know what else to do.  I've prayed and given it to God, but she
still struggles.  We're seeking some outside tutoring right now.  The 4th
grade teacher at Southwest is going to tutor her.  Keep her lifted up in
prayer.  She's pretty much given up completely.  She thinks that she's dumb
and that she'll be placed in special education.  She wrote me a letter last
night telling me to stop telling her that she's smart, because she's not.
She said that she's dumb because her report card says so.  That hurt me so
bad.

Lil' Steve's report card was excellent.  He's doing a great job.  The best
thing we could've done for him was put him at Southwest.

How's the school search going for Jordan?


Dear Colleague,

Earlier this month, the Edison Electric Institute published a paper I wrote
on Bulk-Power Reliability: Potential Problems and Possible Solutions.
Although aimed at the general reader, I hope you'll find the paper
interesting. It is available on the Publications page of my website:
www.EHirst.com.

The key problems I identify include:

Declining generation reserve margins,

Declining transmission capacity relative to load, leading to

Increasing transmission congestion, and

Growing number and complexity of bulk-power transactions.

The primary solutions I discuss include:

Federal legislation to (1) extend FERC authority over the entire bulk-power
industry for reliability and (2) oversee a single North American reliability
organization that sets mandatory standards;

Large regional transmission organizations;

Decide who decides where and when to build new transmission lines, with
regional solutions? likely better than local ones; and?

Expand demand-side participation in energy and ancillary-service markets.

Please let me know if you have any comments on the paper.

Eric
----------------------------------------------
Eric Hirst
Consulting in Electric-Industry Restructuring
106 Capital Circle
Oak Ridge, TN 37830
865-482-5470 (phone & fax)??? Eric@EHirst.com
http://www.EHirst.com/


Kevin,

Great start!  Thanks for the list, it makes the process more transparent.  How would you rate each prospects?  It would be helpful to develop some kind of scoring system based on potential load to be connected, credit quality, and El Paso-RQ tariff barrier.  Any other relevant attributes?

From:	Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate on 08/10/2001 10:27 AM
To:	Lindy Donoho/Enron@enronXgate, Lorraine Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, TK Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Michelle Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, Audrey Robertson/Enron@enronXgate, Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Eric Gadd/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steven Harris/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Wadle/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	FW: Sun Devil Marketing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Wadle, Susan
Subject:	Sun Devil Marketing

Hey gang, I need your help.  The address below will take you to a spreadsheet of marketing contacts for the Sun Devil Project.  I need you to update the spreadsheet as you add customers and discuss the project.  I have added the first dozen that I know about.  Michelle, there is a new contact for Cook Inlet and I gave the lady your name and number after I walked her through the project.

Please keep the spreadsheet current as you talk with customers.  Kim, Steve, Eric, and I will be reviewing the sheet regularly to view progress.  Let me know if you'd like to see it formatted differently or to have other info added.  You can also write out your notes and give them to Susan Wadle and she will input the info for you.

thanks for the help.
kh

P.S.  If you'd like to set up a shortcut on your PC desk top to take you directly to the sheet, let me know and I will set it up for you.

P:common\marketing\TW_NNG\TW Longterm\Sun Devil Marketing.xls


Lets at least get the Florida ones done.  Any idea why she didn't go?

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           04/03/2001 12:00 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Status

Want me to print them and bring them up some time tommorrow or later this
this week?  I have them prepared (just may need to make any minor
adjustments).

Kathleen

Kay Mann
04/03/2001 11:56 AM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron)

Subject: Re: Status

I thought you were supposed to have your toes in the sand in Florida.

I'll have to check with Kathleen on the details of the documentation for the
various development companies.  If there are a couple most active we can put
those on the top of the list.

Kay

	From:  Ann Elizabeth White @ ECT                           04/03/2001 11:43 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan
cc:

Subject: Status

What is the status of  Ben Jacoby's appointment as agent and attorney in fact
for the development companies?


At the request of John Pavetto, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the agreement  meets with your approval, please
execute it and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will have it
executed by Enron and return a copy to you via fax.  If you have any comments
or questions please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.


Gang:

Further clarification on what happened at the pre-hearing conference today:

The Judge set he would rule on only two issues at this time (most likely the ruling will be out within a week):

1.  PX Audit -- The Commission will decide the issue on the current record (this is fine with us)
2. Implementation of Suspension of DA. -- This includes all the DASR issues, ability to make amendments as well as ESP assignments and the like.  The Judge decided he could rule after paper hearings.  The following schedule was agreed to:

11/16 -- Utilities file their proposal with the intent for it to be uniform for all three utilities
11/28 -- Parties file comments on utilities' proposal; may request hearings on specific issues and justify why needed (although the Judge already said he did not believe that hearings were necessary)
12/4 -- Parties file responses on the comments

All other issues will be addressed at another Pre-hearing conference on 12/12.

In response to a question, the Judge said he would not issue a ruling on the retroactive suspension of direct access at this time, but did not believe that hearings were required on the issue.

He also said several times, however, that hearings would be required on all issues that involved dollars and cents. (To most logical people, this would seem to conflict with the notion that no hearings were required on the retroactivity issue  --  but, hey, this is California.)

Bottomline:  This turned out better than we had expected.  We wanted hearings on the money issues and any delay in addressing the retroactivity issue is good for our side.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Kaufman, Paul; Leff, Dan; Hughes, Evan; Sharp, Vicki; Williams, Robert C.; Dietrich, Janet; Huddleson, Diann; Smith, Mike; Frazier, Lamar; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve
Subject:	Update on California PUC Hearing--DA Suspension Implementation; Exit Fees; PX Credit, etc.--11.07.01

Please forward along to others I may have missed but need to know:

The Commission held a hearing this afternoon to discuss the need for hearings on issues surrounding the DA suspension.
With minor exceptions, the utilities told the Commission that the Commission didn't need to conduct hearings, and that the Commission could just go forward with implementing the suspension and assess exit fees.
The utilities said that hearings could be held "sometime later" to determine the exact level of exit fees and how the utilities ought to calcualte the PX credit going forward.
A large group of business customers and suppliers disagreed strongly and made a very good case for hearings.
There were lengthy arguments in front of the judge, at the end of which the judge decided that it would useful to hold another prehearing conference.
The next hearing will be on Dec. 12th.
The judge wanted another hearing to permit folks to have the opportunity to respond to the first round of comments on the issues submitted by everyone last Friday.
In sum, there will be another hearing on Dec. 12th to further discuss the need for hearings prior to the Commission making decisions on these issues.
At this point, it appears that the judge is leaning toward having comprehensive hearings.
Of particular note, at the end of the hearing the judge said that he is NOT inclinded to recommend a retroactive suspension of Direct Access to July 1, and that he didnt' think that the PUC commissioner assigned to the case was either. (Worried that he said too much, he then said he couldn't/shouldn't spead for the commissioner.)
The judge, and the Commissioner who was at the hearing, went on at length abouth the fact that no one submitted their DA contracts to the PUC (as requested in the document the PUC issued asking folks to submit comments on the issues).
Our attorney and the attorneys for suppliers and customers told them that 1) the Commission didn't need to see the actual contracts to get the information necessary via hearings to decide the issues and 2) the Commission doesn't have the authority to ask to see contracts and they ain't likely going to get them without a fight.
Though the probability many not be high, there is at least the chance that the Commission may try to subpoena folks to get the contracts.  Seems prudent to at least be prepared for the possiblity.
Interestingly, Edison made a run at getting the Commission to implement by January 1 its proposal to charge all customers--DA and bundled alike--for Edison's undercollection.
The judge (literally) laughed off the request, and then said no.
As a result, Edison didn't get the leverage it was hoping for prior to our follow up meeting with them tomorrow to discuss the Negative CTC issue.
The judge also gave the DWR representative a pretty good thrashing, e.g., "why are you here, you refuse to be a party, you refuse to provide info," etc.
From today's hearing it appears that DWR will come under increasing pressure to open the kimono and have its numbers scrutinized.
In related news, Davis has announced that he's asked Sempra to meet to renegotiate their DWR contract and said that he'd thus far met with two other generators in "serious negotitations."


Derby 2001!  Thanks for coming Mike.

Regards,

Ed

----------
From: 	Joe Hale
Sent: 	Monday, May 07, 2001 10:49 AM
To: 	Ed Pierangelino

 - ed and mike.JPG


Attached is the Draft offer Letter to Carol Hensley.  Upon your review and
approval we will forward on to Mark Palmer for sign off.

Thank you all for your help and patience.

Ben Herman


I think these will be the first days Susan Bailey gets back from being out.
Please make sure this is OK with her and you guys coordinate on what's going
on.

	Susan Flynn
	05/16/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vacation

 Mark - I would like to take Tuesday, May 30 and Wednesday, May 31, 2000 as
vacation days.   Please let me know if this is OK.  Thanks!


Thanks for giving me some competition in b-ball.  You appreciate the old
school not like these young punks "Bass"  that don't appreciate the tradition
and hard work  behind the glamour in the NBA.  I will try to keep it close
and only win by a few.  Unlike the drubbing I gave to Farragut.

Gary
"Top 50 Fantasy Basketballer of All-time"


Here are the buy/sells we did after lunch.

Supply Deal Market Deal
153071  153057
153096  153135
153109  153109

The purchases are from CPA and the sells are to CES.  Originally these deals
were done for the 21st, I just extended the date and the volumes through the
24th.

Let me know if you have any questions.


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 26, 2001

Notice ID: 3219
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 27-29, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

ALLOCATIONS DUE TO LONG WALL MINING OF LINE SM-123:  OCTOBER 27-29, 2001 - For
the following MLI points: There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no
capacity for ITS customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.
 There is no capacity for overruns.

        Equitable Hi Hat       MLI F3
        KYWV Beaver Creek      MLI H1
        CNR Boldman            MLI CNR02
        CNR Conoway            MLI CNR03
        CNR Johns Creek        MLI CNR08
        CNR Canada             MLI CNR09, CNR10
        CNR Stafford           MLI CNR11
        CNR Thacker/Majestic   MLI CNR12
        CNR Briar Mtn.         MLI CNR13
        CNR Huff Creek         MLI CNR14
        Conoco Grant           MLI P1

TENNESSEE:

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 27, 2001 - New IPP customers received equal shares of
available capacity or their October 27, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever
was less.

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 28, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP customers.
There is no capacity for IPP increases.  Flowing IPP customers received 91.42%
of their October 27, 2001 flowing volumes.

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 29, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP customers.
There is no capacity for IPP increases.

TEXAS EASTERN:

EAGLE:  OCTOBER 27, 2001 - New IPP customers received equal shares of available
capacity or their October 27, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was less.

EAGLE:  OCTOBER 28-29, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP customers.
There is no capacity for IPP increases.

LEBANON AGGREGATE:  OCTOBER 27, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP
customers.  Flowing IPP customers received 146.877% of their October 26, 2001
flowing volumes or their October 27, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was
less.

LEBANON AGGREGATE:  OCTOBER 28, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP
customers.  Flowing IPP customers received 96.276% of their October 27, 2001
flowing volumes or their October 28, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was
less.

LEBANON AGGREGATE:  OCTOBER 29, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP
customers.  Flowing IPP customers received 97.322% of their October 28, 2001
flowing volumes or their October 29, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was
less.

INTERNAL CONSTRAINT:

LANHAM:  OCTOBER 27-29, 2001 - There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There
is no capacity for ITS customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm
customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               Available +
ISS Injections            Available
SIT Injections            Available
Imbalance Paybacks        Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas days of October 27-29, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on October 27-29, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 26, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


he did not.  but he did predict your homosexual preoccupations.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"buddy nguyen" <budanski@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22buddy+20nguyen+22+20+3Cbudanski+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	BoBayMon@aol.com; chi325@hotmail.com; jtsandy@hotmail.com; julsvu@hotmail.com; kimv@palacios.k12.tx.us; Lomani26@cs.com; RRam0679@cs.com; sarahmyu@hotmail.com; Thanh.Roettele@chase.com; Vusta@aol.com; YenT@palacios.k12.tx.us; ANSALON@houston.rr.com; Bryan.Tran@alcoa.com; Diana_Sanchez@enron.net; erin@tisd.net; felica@altavista.com; grace0706@yahoo.com; lcampbel@enron.com; LLam21@hotmail.com; mqdo@yahoo.com; mluu219@hotmail.com; ponvong@tramontina-usa.com; s_trevino25@hotmail.com; ckhvang@soes.com; Dudley@ceimail.com; tpoint@ykc.com; yellonero@ev1.net
Subject:	Re: FW: Nostradamus' prediction on WW3..................

Did Nostradamus predit PoP Music being so popular. Justin Timberlake is
soooo..... dreamy :)

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
LONDON _ `Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy' author Douglas Adams dead at 49.

	 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Louise,

Would you consider being a keynote speaker at this conference (Feb 22
evening)?

The conference will be held in Austin.

We have a very good relationship with UT and we are helping them to organize
this conference.

I shall be glad to provide you more information about the event.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
02:52 PM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 11/02/2000 10:57:00 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation

Vince,

As promised, enclosed please find a brief description of the proposed Feb.
22 - 23 Energy Finance Conference, suitable for dissemination to your
colleagues:

"As Director of the Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
(CEFER), my colleagues and I are planning a practitioner-industry
Conference in Spring 2001, Feb. 22 - 23, to discuss four topics:  Risk
management, Deregulation, Real options, and International/globalization.
Other than the Univ. of Texas participants and selected academics from
other institutions, we expect most participants at the Conference to be
energy practitioners from Houston.  The Conference will begin with a dinner
and address Thur. evening, then continue all day Fri."

Given the energy-finance focus of the Conference, do you believe the
Networks topics is sufficiently energy-related?

Best,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================