See my answers below in red (formulated in close consultation with Jay
Hawthorn and Leonardo Pacheco).

Cynthia

	Mark Taylor@ECT
	04/27/00 04:04 PM

		 To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Bandwidth Products On EnronOnline. (Revised)

The hardest part of preparing the Long Descriptions is making sure all of the
terms used in th GTC's that need to be defined elsewhere are covered.  I'll
have to leave the final determination to the people who drafted the GTC's.  I
also have to point out I don't know much of anything about how bandwidth is
traded, but here are the comments I was able to come up with to the Long
Descriptions:

Bandwidth Units - This concept has been difficult for me - it's not entirely
clear to me where the definition of this comes from - is it the reference in
the box at the top of the relevant Annex?  You are correct. If so, maybe we
should add a line something to the effect of 'Bandwidth Units shall mean DS-3
for this Transaction.'  Or better yet you might consider a generic reference
to the relevant Annex that should apply which might let you delete the
sentence referring to the quality as well. We have changed the first sentence
of the long description to read " A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron
Broadband Services, L.P. ("EBS") pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and
the Buyer shall buy the quantity of DS3 Bandwidth Units submitted by
Counterparty via the Website.

Does 'DSO' need to be defined somewhere? DS0 is a term generally known in the
industry and is only used in the calculation of the Contract Price in the
long description, so we chose not to define it - also the definition is
incredibly long, complex and technical.  If you feel strongly about it, we
can include it, but since the long description tells you how many DS0's you
should include for calculation purposes, we didn't think that it was
necessary.

The way the different Price definitions fit together has also eluded me -
there is a formula in the Long Description and a different formula in the
GTC.  The formula in the long description differs from the formula in the GTC
(and in the Master Agreement) in order to accomodate the way that the price
is being quoted on EnronOnline. The quote represents the variable component
of the "Unit Price" in the GTC's and the Master Agreement - In order not to
confuse people, we decided to include the formula in both the long
description and the confirmation so that customers could know that the Unit
Price was calculated using the price quoted.  Unless industry trading
convention is to the contrary, the site makes more intuitive sense when the
volume quoted and the price quoted use the same units.  If the volume is
Bandwidth Units and the price is a per mile number some counterparties (or
perhaps more likely their lawyers) may be confused.  The GTC contains the
defined term 'Unit Price' which is in $/Bandwidth Unit.  It seems to me that
if we can quote the price as the Unit Price and the volume as Bandwidth
Units, we can ignore the number of DSO's per Bandwidth Unit and the number of
DSO miles for the transaction.

Since they won't change from one product to the next, the two sentences
beginning with 'Any party entering into a Transaction...' could be moved to
the GTC. Since bandwidth is such a new product, we really wanted to highlight
to customers that if they intend to take physical delivery of bandwidth
(which is what we are offering) they will need to establish connectivity with
us.  This is already in the GTC - but in an abundance of caution, we wanted
this fact highlighted, especially since connectivity will entail further
costs to the customer as well as signing documentation such as colocation
agreements, licenses etc. - this can be quite an involved process.

The term 'Contractual Currency' is not used int he GTC.  Can the
parenthetical reference come out?  (The EnronOnline people may care about
this more than I.) Agreed

If the numbers of miles and DSO's need to stay in the Long Descriptions, I
would suggest that you change the references to make it DSO's per Bandwidth
Unit (both where the number is introduced and in the price formula) and that
the unt of measure against which the price is quoted be 'per DSO mile per
month'. It is a quote for one DS0 mile of a Bandwidth Unit for a month.
Since the short description indicates the period for the contract being
offered, we felt like the quotation was pretty clear.  We are also a bit
sensitive to using too many defined terms referring to each other in the long
description.  From a commercial perspective, we are comfortable that the
language used in the quote and the long description are clear and accurate.

Is the volume on the quotes page a monthly or total number?  This needs to be
clear from the Long Description.  If a Customer wanted to buy 5 of the OC3
Bandwidth Units quoted for the period from July 1- July 31, the Customer
would be entitled to 5 OC3's for the period from July 1 - July 31.  I hope
that this is responsive to your question - we weren't entirely clear.

So for example, if you follow all of my suggestions, you might end up with
something like this:

A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. (&EBS8)
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The price
shall be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.  Annex A-1 of the
General Terms and Conditions shall apply to this Transaction.
The term of the Transaction shall begin at 12:00 a.m. (EST) on the Effective
Date and continue to 11:59:59 p.m. (EST) on the Termination Date. The
Effective Date is <Start Date> and the Termination Date is <Termination
Date>.
The Transaction shall be for Bandwidth between the New York Market Pooling
Point (111 8th Avenue, Suite 1517, New York, NY 10011, NPA-NXX: 212-462,
CLLI: NYCMNY83H62) and the Los Angeles Market Pooling Point (530 W. 6th
Street, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90014, NPA-NXX: 213-362, CLLI:
LSAJCAWZH04).
The price is quoted in US Dollars.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted is one Bandwidth Unit
per month and the quantity shown shall be in number of Bandwidth Units per
month.

If quoting the price as a per Bandwidth Unit number doesn't work it would be
more like this:

A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. (&EBS8)
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The number of
DSO,s per Bandwidth Unit is 672. The price shall be as submitted by the
Counterparty via the Website.  Annex A-1 of the General Terms and Conditions
will apply to this Transaction.
The term of the Transaction shall begin at 12:00 a.m. (EST) on the Effective
Date and continue to 11:59:59 p.m. (EST) on the Termination Date. The
Effective Date is <Start Date> and the Termination Date is <Termination
Date>.
The Transaction shall be for Bandwidth between the New York Market Pooling
Point (111 8th Avenue, Suite 1517, New York, NY 10011, NPA-NXX: 212-462,
CLLI: NYCMNY83H62) and the Los Angeles Market Pooling Point (530 W. 6th
Street, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90014, NPA-NXX: 213-362, CLLI:
LSAJCAWZH04), for a total of 2,446 DSO miles.
The price is quoted in US Dollars.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted is one DS0 mile per
month and the quantity shown shall be in number of Bandwidth Units per month.
Therefore, the Contract Price will be calculated as follows: price x the
number of DS0,s per Bandwidth Unit x the number of DS0 miles x the number of
Bandwidth Units.

Please let me know if you have any questions - I will go ahead and approve
the product in the system so you can proceed without me if necessary.

Mark

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
04/27/2000 01:38 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth Products On EnronOnline. (Revised)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
12:36 PM ---------------------------

Leonardo Pacheco
04/27/2000 01:07 PM
To: Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Bandwidth Products On EnronOnline. (Revised)

Please note that we have added another product type (bringing the total
number to three)!.
We have built three new Products Types called US Bandwidth DS3 Physical
Forward, US Bandwidth OC3 Physical Forward, and US Bandwidth OC3c Physical
Forward. Please go into DataManager and approve these Product Types (look at
attached Document for long descriptions).  We are going life on the 1st of
May.  If you need help with the approval process contact Dale Neuner (ext.
39746) or myself (ext. 39938). Please Do Not Reject the Product Type. If you
have questions or changes to the Product Type please contact me at your
convenience.

Thank you very much for your co-operation!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


Jim:
Here is the latest contact list from us and CSFB.  Don will be giving you a
call soon.
Ben


Sara-

Here is a new conformation.  The terms check to the deal ticket.

Jeff

How are the other confirms progressing Bear has called again for their
confirmations.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 08:57 AM
---------------------------

Aneela Charania
06/28/2000 08:51 AM
To: Jo Zepeda/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint
Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Revised Term Sheet!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
08:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  David J Vitrella                           06/28/2000 07:20 AM

To: Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised Term Sheet!!!!

Throw the first one out
---------------------- Forwarded by David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
07:17 AM ---------------------------

"Simon, Jon" <jon.simon@csfb.com> on 06/27/2000 05:44:30 PM
To: "David Vitrella @ Enron" <david.j.vitrella@enron.com>, "John Greene @
Enron" <john.greene@enron.com>, "Selena Reyes @ Enron" <sreyes@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Revised Term Sheet!!!!

With apologies....Got the payment dates wrong. This has the correct
information.

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Jon
 <<Swap_Jun_27_00.doc>>
--------------------------
Jon Simon
Equity Derivatives
CREDIT | First
SUISSE | Boston
Phone (800) 326-9750
Phone (212) 325-5227
Fax (212) 325-8089
Email: jon.simon@csfb.com

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Swap_Jun_27_00.doc


Busy week while you were gone. Here is what I bought.

11/14-17   15,000/d   $5.83   TCOAP   DJenkins
11/15-20    30,000/d   $6.02   TCOAP   S.Hendrickson
11/17          4,108/d      $5.95   TGP/TCO Broadruncobb  DJ
11/18-20     4,108/d     $5.85    TGP/TCO Broadruncobb  DJ


Paul,

FYI, you were invited to our off-site because we felt that our businesses
were so linked together and that we could all get on the same page with
regard to updates, vision and relationship building.  We also invited Joe and
Thor as the only other non-EGM people.  If you can make it would be great but
we do know how difficult it is to make it over.  I did hear your California
request and it could happen.  We haven't found the right place yet.
California is experiencing serious blackouts and it could be difficult.
We'll be in touch.

Cheers,
mike


[IMAGE]	?

In the 16-31 January edition of designzine.com,  investigate the young world
of e-mailers on-the-go. In Metropolis,  Andrew Blum,s talking about the new
Motorola Talkabout may make you feel like  an old fogy; it did me. And, in
the quarterly edition of [dizajn]  le journal, curators at the Pompidou  in
Paris offer some insight into the institution,s design-collecting policy;
and, yes, the article is in English.

Have you heard the favorable buzz about the aluminum  exhibition in
Pittsburgh? It will soon be traveling to New York,s Cooper-Hewitt.  Check out
the Books  section for a review of show,s hefty catalogue.

The Calendar  continues to be jam-packed with a vast number of events. For
the exhibition  on the past 100 years of California culture, see the Home
Page.

And don,t forget about designstand.com,  our design-store companion site.

Cordially,

Mel Byars
Editorial Director
designzine.com

?

If you would like to remove your e-mail address from  our mailing list,
please click here.

?

?


Will do.  Thanks for the heads up!

	David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/28/2000 07:54 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alison Keogh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
McGrory/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses - Australia

Tana, I will be on leave until 2 January 2001. Over that period I have made
arrangements for the legal review of the daily EOL credit responses to be
reviewed  outside counsel. Accordingly over that period would you forward the
daily spreadsheets to my admin. assistant Alison Keogh. She will then
coordinate the review. Whilst counsel have been briefed on the process and
what is expected of them  it would be of assistance if you would continue
your current practice of highlighting in your covering email any particular
counterparties on which you would like a response from us.


Had a conversation with PG&E this afternoon and we're almost finished.  Just
a few loose ends to tie up.  Sara


Hi Everyone,

There is a new version of Deal Entry (Ver. 2.6.6.58)  in stage that needs to
be User Acceptance Tested.

The changes were actually for Australia (wrong date/time showing, problem
with EOL) and London (fix to default settings).
These changes should actually be invisible to Houston so you should see no
difference between the way it was working before and now.

Please test the application (as you would normally use it) and let me know
(by way of email or phone call) if Deal Entry is working well, and can be
migrated to Production.  We are hoping to release it to Prod by this evening,
(January 12, 2001).

Thanks,
Nadine Costanzo (713)853-9863.
.


I am missing the following deals for Jeff Richter brokered by APB:

Enron buys from Idaho Power 25 mw of NP-15 for 12/28-12/30 for $245
Enron buys from BPA 25 mw of Mid-C for 12/28-12/30 for $275


Well, I hate to write this, but I found out last night that I will have to be
in Chicago next Wednesday thru Friday.  Call me.

DG
3-9573

Debny Greenlee
08/15/2000 05:35 PM
To: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane S Saladino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry G Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Tyler
Marz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ellenberger/Corp/Enron@ENRON, LaShanda
Poledore/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Max Doner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Eubanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin W Drachenberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Truong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff W Westover/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paula Lee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristie
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shielah
Castro/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donnie Myers/NA/Enron@ENRON, Genaro
Mendoza/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles
Jacobs/NA/Enron@Enron, Darla Saucier/NA/Enron@Enron, Valerie
Curtis/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Mousteiko/NA/Enron@Enron, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Peterson/NA/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Training

Please plan to attend one of two  training sessions conducted by Darron Giron
where he will discuss some general aspects of risk management as they relate
to the operational analysis process.  Following his presentation, we will
clarify some of the Phase II OA issues.  The sessions will be held on
Wednesday, August 23 and Thursday, August 24 in Room 37c1.  Please check with
your leads if you are unable to attend during your scheduled time.  Thanks.

Wednesday, August 23
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm

Purchase Team

Thursday, August 24
9:00 pm - 10:30 pm

Sales Team


*************************************************************************************************************************************************

You are invited to attend the following presentation:

PSIM: A Power Simulation Tool

PSIM is a proprietary model developed by Enron Research Group.

?	It takes Power, Gas, Weather and demand information into consideration and
	uses Monte-Carlo simulation to assess the expected deal value and risk distribution.
?	It evaluates complex electricity related contracts such
as Full Requirement  and load following contract.
?	It also provides a valuation tool for power assets and asset management deals.
?	It works for both deal specific or portfolio issues.

In this presentation we will show how the model can be used to deal with various types
of contracts, explain the model structure and point out further applications.

Date:		October 30, 2001
Time: 	4:00 pm
Location: 	EB5C2
Presenter: 	Alex Huang

Registration is required for a head count.
Please call Shirley Crenshaw at 3-5290 to register.

Pizza and soft drinks will be served.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil33.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded33.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom1-8-02.pdf


I am pleased to announce the following promotions effective February 1 within
ENA Energy Operations.  These individuals have been promoted in recognition
of their outstanding performance and their contributions to the continuing
success of Enron North America. Please join me in congratulating these
employees on their promotions.

Promotions to Senior Director

Kristin Albrecht serves as Business Controller for ENA,s power business.
Along with Leslie Reeves, Kristin ensures that power transactions are handled
accurately and smoothly from beginning to end.  Kristin,s primary focus is on
risk controls and daily reporting of positions and p&l for East Power
trading, West Power trading and Genco operations.

Brenda Herod serves as Business Controller for ENA,s assets business, working
with the Gas Assets group and the Texas trading desk.  Her responsibilities
include global contracts and facilities, risk management, confirmations, gas
scheduling, volume management, settlements and regulatory compliance for
Houston Pipeline, LRC and Enron Midstream Services.

Leslie Reeves is a Business Controller for ENA,s power business, working
closely with Kristin Albrecht in managing mid and back office support for the
East, West and Genco power trading groups.  Her primary responsibilities are
documentation and settlements, with a focus on contract administration, cash
forecasting and cash management.

Mary Solmonson leads ENA,s Global Database Management Group, collecting and
validating information on our customers, contracts, pipelines and facilities,
as well as published prices.  These activities support overall Energy
Operations responsibilities from Risk to Logistics to Settlement.  In
addition, Mary has been instrumental in the promotion and implementation of
the Global systems across Enron to provide control, consistency, and common
data throughout the organization.

Promotions to Director

Scott Pleus serves as Business Controller for Enron,s Emerging Products.
These businesses include Bandwidth, Pulp and Paper, and Weather.  His primary
responsibilities include day-to-day functions of risk management,
confirmations, pulp and paper scheduling, and settlements as well as long
term system development.

Sheri Thomas led ENA,s natural gas off-system settlements function throughout
1999. Her responsibilities included cash forecasting, collections, and
accountability for receivables and payables for ENA,s gas business in the
East, West and Central regions of the US.  Sheri accepted a new assignment in
January 2000 and is now managing the Enron Online operations.

Promotions to Manager

Bennett Kaufman manages the risk management administration function for the
Equity Trading and Debt Trading groups.  He has also had experience in
supporting the options book for natural gas derivatives trading.  Prior to
joining Enron in early 1998, Bennett worked in trading operations for
investment banking firms in New York.

Richard McKeel is the Systems Integration Analyst within Global Database
Management, overseeing the change management process and new software
development needed to interface the Global applications with strategic
systems ) Sitara, Unify, EnPower, Solarc, SAP, and EnronOnline.

Other Promotions

Specialist to Senior Specialist:    Analyst to Specialist:

Sylvia Campos ) Deal Compliance Contract Records  Tara Eslick ) Financial
Trading Risk Management
Kam Keiser ) Gas Risk Management- Central Desk   Victoria Versen ) Gas
Logistics - East Desk
Phillip Love ) Risk Controls Operational Analysis
Jeff Coats ) Gas Risk Management - Central Desk
Monica Lande ) West Power Risk Management (Portland) Senior Clerk to Staff:
Trang Le )  Strategic Operations ) Project Unify
John Postlewaite ) East Power Risk Management  Anthony Campos ) Deal
Compliance Contract Records
Diane Seib ) Documentation (Calgary)     Kori Loibl ) Gas Risk Management -
Financial Books
Donnie Vinson ) West Power Risk Management (Portland)
Imelda Frayre ) Strategic Operations - Project Sitara
        Clerk to Senior Clerk:
Staff to Specialist:
        Leslie Smith ) Information & Records Management
Amy Degeyter ) Power Documentation    Melinda Whalen ) Documentation (Calgary)
Michael Nguyen ) Emerging Products Risk Management
Sherlyn Schumack ) Logistics Volume Management
Karie Hastings ) Strategic Operations - Project Sitara

In addition, Peggy Hedstrom and Brent Price were promoted to Vice President,
as announced in the memo issued by Enron Corp. Office of the Chairman.  Peggy
leads Energy Operations for Enron Canada, with responsibility for risk
management, documentation and gas logistics.  Peggy also serves as a key
interface with Canadian pipelines as a member of several industry
committees.  Brent is the Senior Business Controller for Gas Trading
Operations in the U.S.  His responsibilities include risk management,
confirmations, volume management and settlements for the East, West and
Central regions.  He also provides operational expertise in the due diligence
phase of the evaluations of joint ventures and acquisitions.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'Barbo, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Guevara, Mauricio
Cc:	Hardeman, Kathleen D.
Subject:	 LNG Team List

Mauricio,

Please change my Home number to 713 812-7158 and my FAX number to the number given in the note below.

Thanks,

Paul
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'Barbo, Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Guevara, Mauricio
Subject:	LNG Team List

Mauricio,

Please change my FAX number to 713 646-6560.

Thanks,

Paul


Durasoft (the company that did the Java class) will be holding a course on COM object programming for Enron Networks.  COM allows for programs to be written such that they are available for execution to other programs on a language independent basis.  Several Research members are interested in this technology.

The class is $15,000 for 15 people and NetWorks has a few spaces that are unfilled.  We can send a few people, therefore, for about $1000 each.  The course is May 14-18 (which conflicts with the EPRM 2001 Conference), so they need a total soon.

Is this course something group members can sign up for?

Thanks,
Martin


----- Original Message -----
From: <pam.hardy@weatherford.com>
To: <christine.welsh@weatherford.com>; <sharon.ives@weatherford.com>;
<candice.govea@weatherford.com>; <mary.govea@weatherford.com>;
<andrew.barry@weatherford.com>; <monte.johnson@weatherford.com>;
<steve.mckinney@weatherford.com>; <tina.graham@weatherford.com>;
<angelamcdaniel@yahoo.com>; <cen60418@centuryinter.net>;
<ckubala@comfortsystemsusa.com>; <cweeks@dttus.com>;
<Charlie_Favret@Dell.com>; <repoman1603@yahoo.com>; <cctowns@thenett.com>;
<GinterDev@aol.com>; <Ckbates94@aol.com>; <ctull@tnl.org>;
<daniel@savedbygrace.zzn.com>; <Dkyle@Houston.RR.com>; <sigkas69@aol.com>;
<dpolnac@myway.com>; <skdimice@TexasChildrensHospital.org>;
<dmoise@flash.net>; <GIVENSH@hrprep.com>; <Venuba@aol.com>;
<Dennis.Hardy@gecapital.com>; <jjgomez@inu.net>; <lesliejo@bryanisd.org>;
<Kctwalker@aol.com>; <kubalas@kochind.com>; <LaneLS
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 8:26 AM
Subject: Fw: Personal Testimony of George Bush

> >  Personal Testimony of George Bush
> >  From: George W. Bush:
> >
> >  Actually, the seeds of my decision had been planted the year before, by
> > the
> >  Reverend Billy Graham. He visited my family for a summer weekend in
> > Maine.I
> >  saw him preach at the small summer church, St. Ann's by the Sea. We all
> > had
> > lunch on the patio overlooking the ocean. One evening my dad asked Billy
> > to
> >  answer questions from a big group of family gathered for the weekend.
He
> >  sat by the fire and talked. And what he said sparked a change in my
> > heart.
> >  I don't remember the exact words. It was more the power of his example.
> > The
> >  Lord was so clearly reflected in his gentle and loving demeanor. The
> > next
> >  day we  walked and talked at Walker's Point, and I knew I was in the
> >  presence of a great man. He was like a magnet; I felt drawn to
> >  seek something different. He didn't lecture or admonish; he shared
> > warmth
> >  and concern. Billy Graham didn't make you feel guilty; he made you feel
> >  loved.
> >  Over the course of that weekend, Reverend Graham planted a mustard seed
> > in
> >  my soul, a seed that grew over the next year. He led me to the path,
and
> > I
> >  began walking. It was the beginning of a change in my life. I had
always
> >  been a "religious" person, had regularly attended church, even taught
> >  Sunday School and served as an altar boy. But that weekend my faith
took
> > on
> >  a new meaning. It was the beginning of a new walk where I would commit
> > my
> >  heart to Jesus Christ. I was humbled to learn that God sent His Son to
> > die
> >  for a sinner like me. I was comforted to know that through the Son, I
> > could
> > find God's amazing grace, a grace that crosses every border, every
> > barrier
> >  and is open to everyone. Through the love of Christ's life, I could
> >  understand the life changing powers of faith. When I returned to
> > Midland, I
> >  began reading the Bible regularly. Don Evans  talked me into joining
him
> >  and another friend, Don Jones, at a men's community Bible study. The
> > group
> >  had first assembled the year before, in Spring of 1984, at the
beginning
> > of
> >  the downturn in the energy industry. Midland was hurting. A lot of
> > people
> >  were looking for comfort and strength and direction. A couple of men
> >  started the Bible study as a support group, and it grew. By the time I
> >  began attending, in the fall of 1985, almost 120 men would gather. We
> > met
> >  in small discussion groups of ten or twelve, then joined the larger
> > group
> >  for full meetings. Don Jones picked me up every week for the meetings.
I
> >  remember
> >  looking forward to them. My interest in reading the Bible grew stronger
> > and
> >  stronger, and the words became clearer and more meaningful. We studied
> >  Acts, the story of the Apostles building the Christian Church, and next
> >  year, the Gospel of Luke. The preparation for each meeting took several
> >  hours, reading the Scripture passages and thinking through responses to
> >  discussion questions. I took it seriously, with my usual touch of
> > humor....
> >
> >  Laura and I were active members of the First Methodist Church of
> > Midland,
> >  and we participated in many family programs, including James Dobson's
> > Focus
> >  on the Family series on raising children. As I studied and learned,
> >  Scripture took on greater meaning, and gained confidence and
> > understanding
> >  in my faith. I read the Bible regularly. Don Evans gave me the
> > "one-year"
> >  Bible, a Bible divided into 365 daily readings, each one including a
> >  section from the New Testament, the Old Testament, Psalms, and
Proverbs.
> > I
> >  read through that Bible every other year.
> >
> >  During the years in between, I pick different chapters to study at
> >  different times. I have also learned the power of prayer. I pray for
> >  guidance. I do not pray for earthly things, but for heavenly things,
for
> >  wisdom and patience and understanding. My faith gives me focus and
> >  perspective. It teaches humility. But I also recognize that faith can
be
> >  misinterpreted in the political process. Faith is an important part of
> > my
> >  life. I believe it is important so I live my faith, not flaunt it.
> > America
> > is a great country because of our religious freedoms. It is important
for
> >  any leader to respect the faith of others. That point was driven home
> > when
> >  Laura and I visited Israel in 1998. We had traveled to Rome to spend
> >  Thanksgiving with our daughter, who was attending a school program
> > there,
> >  and spent three days in Israel on the way home. It was an incredible
> >  experience. I remember waking up at the Jerusalem Hilton and opening
the
> >  curtains and seeing the Old City before us, the Jerusalem stone glowing
> >  gold. We visited the Western Wall and the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.
> > And
> >  we went to the Sea of Galilee and stood atop the hill  where Jesus
> >  delivered the Sermon on the Mount. It was an overwhelming feeling to
> > stand
> >  in the spot where the most famous
> >  speech in the history of the world was delivered, the spot where Jesus
> >  outlined the character and conduct of a believer and gave his disciples
> > and
> >  the world the beatitudes, the golden rule, and the Lord's Prayer.  Our
> >  delegation included four gentile governors-one Methodist, two
Catholics,
> >  and a Mormon, and several Jewish-American friends. Someone suggested we
> >  read Scripture. I chose to read "Amazing Grace," my favorite hymn.
Later
> >  that night we all gathered at a restaurant in Tel Aviv for dinner
before
> > we
> >  boarded our middle-of-night flight back to America. We talked about the
> >  wonderful experiences and thanked the guides and government officials
> > who
> >  had introduced us to their country.
> >
> >  And toward the end of the meal, one of our friends rose to share a
> > story,
> >  to tell us how he, a gentile, and his friend, a Jew, had  (unbeknownst
> > to
> >  the rest of us) walked down to the Sea of Galilee, joined hands
> > underwater,
> >  and prayed together, on bended knee. Then out of his mouth came a hymn
> > he
> >  had known as a child, a hymn he hadn't thought about in years. He got
> > every
> >   word right:"Now is the time approaching, by prophets long foretold,
> > when
> >  all shall dwell together, One Shepherd and one   fold. Now Jew and
> > gentile,
> >  meeting, from many a distant shore, around an altar kneeling, one
common
> >  Lord adore. Faith changes lives. I know, because faith has changed
> > mine."
> >  I could not be governor if I did not believe in a divine plan that
> > supersedes all human plans. Politics is a fickle business. Polls change.
> >  Today's friend is tomorrow's adversary. People lavish praise and
> > attention.
> >  Many times it is genuine; sometimes it is not. Yet I build my life on a
> >  foundation that will not shift. My faith frees me. Frees me to put the
> >  problem of the moment in proper perspective. Frees me to make decisions
> >  that others might not like. Frees me to try to do the right thing, even
> >  though it may not poll well... The death penalty is a difficult issue
> > for
> >  supporters as well as its opponents. I have a reverence for life; my
> > faith
> >  teaches that life is a gift from our Creator. In a perfect
> >  world, life is given by God and only taken by God. I hope someday our
> >  society will respect life, the full spectrum of life, from the unborn
to
> >  the elderly. I hope someday unborn children will be protected by law
and
> >  welcomed in life.  I support the death penalty because I believe, if
> >  administered swiftly and justly, capital punishment is a deterrent
> > against
> >  future violence and will save other innocent lives. Some advocates of
> > life
> >  will challenge why I oppose abortion yet support the death penalty. To
> > me,
> >  it's the difference between innocence and guilt.
> >
> >  Today, two weeks after Jeb's inauguration, in my church in downtown
> > Austin,
> >  Pastor Mark Craig, was telling me that my re-election was the first
> >  Governor to win back-to-back, four-year terms in the history of the
> > State
> >  of Texas. It was a beginning, not an end.... People are starved for
> >  faithfulness. He talked of the need for honesty in government. He
warned
> > that leaders who cheat on their wives will cheat their country, will
> > cheat
> >  their colleagues, will cheat themselves.  Pastor Craig said that
America
> > is
> >  starved for honest leaders. He told the story of Moses, asked by God to
> >  lead his people to a land of milk and honey. Moses had a lot of reasons
> > to
> >  shirk the task. As the Pastor told it, Moses' basic reaction was,
> > "Sorry,
> >  God, I'm busy. I've got a family. I've got sheep to tend. I've got a
> > life.
> >  "Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh, and bring the sons of Israel out
> > of
> >  Egypt? The people won't believe me, he protested. I'm not a very good
> >  speaker. Oh, my Lord, send, I pray, some other person," Moses pleaded.
> > But
> >  God did not, and Moses ultimately did His bidding, leading his people
> >  through forty years of wilderness and wandering, relying on God for
> >  strength and direction and inspiration. "People are starved for
> >  leadership," Pastor Craig said, "starved for leaders who have ethical
> > and
> >  moral courage." "It is not enough to have an ethical compass to know
> > right
> >  from wrong," he argued. "America needs leaders who have the moral
> > courage
> >  to do what is right for the right reason. It's not always
> >  easy or convenient for leaders to step forward," he acknowledged.
> >  "Remember, even Moses had doubts." "He was talking to you," my mother
> > later
> >  said. The pastor was, of course, talking to all of us, challenging each
> > one
> >  of us to make the most of our lives, to assume the mantle of leadership
> > and
> >  responsibility wherever we find it. He was calling on us to use
whatever
> >  power we have, in business, in politics, in our communities, and in our
> >  families, to do good for the right reason. And his sermon spoke
directly
> > to
> >  my heart and my life.... There was no magic moment of decision. After
> >  talking with my family during the Christmas holidays, then hearing this
> >  rousing sermon, to make most of every moment, during my inaugural
church
> >  service, I gradually felt more comfortable with the prospect of a
> >  presidential campaign. My family would love me, my faith would sustain
> > me,
> > no
> >  matter what. "During the more than half century of my life, we have
seen
> > an
> >  unprecedented decay in our American culture, a decay that has eroded
the
> >  foundations of our collective values and moral standards of conduct.
> > Our
> >  sense of personal  responsibility has declined dramatically, just as
the
> >  role and responsibility of the federal government have increased. The
> >  changing culture blurred the sharp contrast between right and wrong and
> >  created a new standard of conduct: "If it feels good, do it." and "If
> >  you've got a problem, blame somebody else'."   "Individuals are not
> >  responsible for their actions," the new culture has said. "We are all
> >  victims of forces beyond our control." We have gone from a culture of
> >  sacrifice and saving to a culture obsessed with grabbing all the gusto.
> > We
> >  went from accepting responsibility to assigning blame. As government
did
> >  more and more, individuals were required to do less and less. The new
> >  culture said: if people were poor, the government should feed them. If
> >  someone had no house, the government should provide one. If criminals
> > are
> >  not responsible for their acts, then the answers are not prisons, but
> >  social programs.... "For our culture to change, it must change one
> > heart,
> >  one soul, and one conscience at a time. Government can spend money, but
> > it
> >  cannot put hope in our hearts or a sense of purpose in our
lives."...But
> >  government should welcome the active involvement of people who are
> >  following a religious imperative to love their neighbors through after
> >  school programs, child care, drug treatment, maternity group homes, and
> > a
> >  range of other services. Supporting these men and women - the soldiers
> > in
> >  the armies of compassion - is the next bold step of welfare reform,
> > because
> >  I know that changing hearts will change our entire society."
> >  "During the opening months of my presidential campaign, I have traveled
> > our
> >  country and my heart has been warmed. My experiences have reinvigorated
> > my
> >  faith in the greatness of Americans. They have reminded me that
> > societies
> >  are renewed from the bottom up, not the top down. Everywhere I go, I
see
> >  people of love and faith, taking time to help a neighbor in need. These
> >  people and thousands like them are the heart and soul and greatness of
> >  America. And I want to do my part. I am running for President because I
> >  believe America must seize this moment, America must lead. We must give
> > our
> >  prosperity a greater purpose, a purpose of peace and freedom and hope.
> > We
> >  are a great nation of good and loving people. And together, we have a
> >  charge to keep."
> >
> >  ** (Please Spread this around on the Internet . . ..it will never be
> >  published by the biased news media. The Internet serves notice that the
> > > fourth estate no longer has an exclusive control over what is
published
> > for
> > > the people to see and hear.)
> > >
> > > Steve McDonald
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >


I tried calling you last night but your phone just kept ringing.

AND, John Kinder called me this morning and told me I didn't get my
capacity.  He said the winter goes for max rate and I bid $.16, but the
goober would not give me a good feel for what it went for.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:11 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Daniel.Harris@gs.com
Cc:	Gordon, Talya
Subject:	RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs International

please see attached.
if ok, please sign and fax back to 44 20 7774 0457.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: 09 October 2001 19:52
To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
International

Sorry to not reply sooner - too many interruptions - see attached (I tried
to track language in PB).  Sara

(See attached file: Amendment to GSI TOBR1.doc)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:21 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara; Daniel.Harris@gs.com; Daniel.Harris@gs.com
   Cc:     kara.saxon@gs.com; Heard, Marie; talya.gordon@gs.com; Glover,
             Sheila
   Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
             International

   please let me know which provision of the terms of business you think
   should
   be amended in that way.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
   Sent: 09 October 2001 14:18
   To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com; Daniel.Harris@gs.com
   Cc: kara.saxon@gs.com; Marie.Heard@enron.com; talya.gordon@gs.com;
   Sheila.Glover@enron.com
   Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
   International

   Daniel:

   What about the limitation of liability language which you suggested
   could
   be similar to the PB agreement (your 9/20/01 email)?

   Sara

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:51 AM
      To:     Shackleton, Sara; Daniel.Harris@gs.com
      Cc:     kara.saxon@gs.com; Heard, Marie; talya.gordon@gs.com; Glover,
                Sheila
      Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
                International

      Please see attached.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
      Sent: 08 October 2001 20:39
      To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
      Cc: kara.saxon@gs.com; Marie.Heard@enron.com; talya.gordon@gs.com;
      Sheila.Glover@enron.com
      Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
      International

      Daniel:  With respect to the Terms of Business Letter, please email a
      copy
      of the proposed side letter (to handle arbitration and limitation of
      liability).  I just want to review the "final product".  We have all
      other
      documents ready for immediate execution.  Sorry for the delay and I
      appreciate your patience.  Regards.

      Sara Shackleton
      Enron Wholesale Services
      1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
      Houston, TX  77002
      Ph:  (713) 853-5620
      Fax: (713) 646-3490

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Harris+2C+20Daniel+22+20+3CDaniel+2EHarris+40gs+2Ecom+
      3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:44 AM
         To:     Shackleton, Sara
         Cc:     kara.saxon@gs.com; Heard, Marie; talya.gordon@gs.com;
   Glover,
                   Sheila
         Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
                   International

         Sara

         Arbitration - we will agree to English courts as per the language
         amending
         the osla. I will prepare an amendment side letter.

         Limitation of Liability - this is our standard position. I propose
      the
         language agreeed to by you for the PB agreement.

         I trust this will now close the open issues.

         I look forward to hearing from you

         Kind regards

         Daniel

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
         Sent: 17 September 2001 23:51
         To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
         Cc: kara.saxon@gs.com; Marie.Heard@enron.com; talya.gordon@gs.com;
         Sheila.Glover@enron.com
         Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
         International

         Daniel:

         Thank you for your response.  Unfortunately, the outstanding
   issues
         relating to the Terms of Business Letter impact our corporate
   policy.
         If
         you insist upon arbitration, it should be at either party's option
      and
         we
         can agree to arbitrate in accordance with the International
   Chamber
      of
         Commerce Rules.  Also, as you mentioned below, there may be
   non-prime
         brokerage issues that relate to the terms of business and,
   therefore,
         are
         not adequately addressed in the terms of business letter.  We do
   have
         other
         business relationships with GSI and again request inclusion of
         limitation
         of liability language in the terms of business letter.  I propose:

         "Neither party shall have any liability arising from this Letter
   or
      from
         any obligations which relate to this Letter for any indirect,
      special,
         punitive, exemplary, incidental or consequential loss or damage."

         Please reconsider the foregoing with explanation.  I will be out
   of
      the
         office 9/18/01 in the a.m.

         All remaining documents have been completed and we will have them
         executed
         together with the terms of business letter.

         Regards.  Sara

         Sara Shackleton
         Enron Wholesale Services
         1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
         Houston, TX  77002
         Ph:  (713) 853-5620
         Fax: (713) 646-3490

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Harris+2C+20Daniel+22+20+3CDaniel+2EHarris+40gs+2Ecom+
         3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:15 AM
            To:     Shackleton, Sara
            Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
                      International

            Sara

            The terms of business are GSI's general terms and span your
         relationship
            with GSI generally. There may be non-prime brokerage issues
   that
         relate
            to
            the terms of business. Not everything in the TOBs intersects
   with
      the
         PB
            relationship, certainly if you do other business with GSI.

            Re the liability provision, I think your concerns are
   adequately
            addressed
            in the documentation as drafted.

            I would be grateful if you would come back to me as soon as
      possible
         so
            we
            can try to get this wrapped up today.

            Kind regards

            Daniel

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
   [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
            Sent: 10 September 2001 21:02
            To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
            Subject: RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
            International

            Daniel:

            Thanks for the message.  It seems to me that the terms of the
   PB
            conflict
            because J14 conflicts with A3, that is, (i)  J14 conflicts with
      Par.8
            requiring the conclusion that English courts will not apply to
   the
         Terms
            of
            Business agreement and (ii) A3 requires that English courts
      prevail.
            Are
            you agreeing with this analysis?

            Also, there is nothing in the Terms of Business agreement to
      conflict
            with
            the limitation of liability language of the PB applicable to
   the
      PB
            (except
            for silence on the matter).  You didn't address this point.  It
   is
         Enron
            Corp. policy to include such language and I would like to limit
      the
            Terms
            of Business in the same manner.

            Can you call me at 9 am Houston time on Tuesday, Sept. 11?  or
         suggest a
            different time?  I am not trying to belabor execution of the
   the
            remaining
            documents.

            Thanks.

            Sara Shackleton
            Enron Wholesale Services
            1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
            Houston, TX  77002
            Ph:  (713) 853-5620
            Fax: (713) 646-3490

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   "Harris, Daniel" <Daniel.Harris@gs.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Harris+2C+20Daniel+22+20+3CDaniel+2EHarris+40gs+2Ecom+
            3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Monday, September 10, 2001 1:23 AM
               To:     Shackleton, Sara
               Cc:     Daniella.Bodman-Morris@gs.com; Heard, Marie
               Subject:  RE: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman
   Sachs
                         International

               Sara
               Actually, I believe we resolved these when we spoke.
      Arbitration -
            more
               appropriate to general terms of business which principally
            contemplate
               the
               regulatory rules to which we are subject (SFA rules). In the
      event
         of
               inconsistency, the terms of the PB agreement govern (clause
      A3).

               I also amended the OSLA by side letter, which I sent over.

               Kind regards

               Daniel

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
               Sent: 07 September 2001 20:45
               To: Daniel.Harris@gs.com
               Cc: Daniella.Bodman-Morris@gs.com; Heard, Marie
               Subject: ECT Investments, Inc. account with Goldman Sachs
            International

               Daniel:

               Thanks for finalizing the Prime Brokerage Agreement (the
         "Agreement")
               with my colleague Angela Davis.

               I have two points with respect to the Terms of Business
   Letter
            relating
               to the changes made to the Agreement which I believe we
      discussed
         but
               were not in a position to resolve at the time.  These are:

               (1)  Par. 8 Arbitration (which should conform to Clause J,
   Par.
      14
         of
               the Agreement).  I recall that we were discussing the
   possible
      use
         of
               arbitration in the Agreement (and existence of arbitration
   in
      the
            OSLA)
               so that we would not need to amend this particular paragraph
   of
         the
               Terms of Business Letter.  Since we ultimately agreed to
      English
            courts,
               I think we need to conform the Terms of Business Letter
   which
      will
               prevail if in conflict with the Agreement.

               (2)  Par. 8 Arbitration (which should be limited in the same
         manner
            as
               Clause J, Par. 11 as to limitation of liability).  I believe
      that
         you
               and Angela agreed to the revisions in the Agreement.  Why
         shouldn't
               these be mirrored in the Terms of Business Letter?

               I look forward to hearing from you and completing the rest
   of
      the
               account documentation.  Regards.

               Sara Shackleton
               Enron Wholesale Services
               1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
               Houston, TX  77002
               Ph:  (713) 853-5620
               Fax: (713) 646-3490

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and
               may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use
         of
            the
               intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
         disclosure
            by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply
               to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
               all
               copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
         are
            not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************

       - Amendment to TOBs.doc << File: Amendment to TOBs.doc >>

 - Amendment to TOBs.doc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 4/27/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  ClearCase Patch
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This patch will resolve several issues involving the MVFS (ClearCase file system.)
Backout: Remove the patch
Contact(s): 	Troy Beyer  713.345.8316  713.406.1782

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 4/28/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 4/28/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London  thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  ISDN Calling Name and Number
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for number and name to appear on telephone displays.  If testing is successful,
permanent changes will be put into effect at a later date.  These will not be service affecting.
Backout: Unbusy trunk group.
Contact(s): 	Cynthia Siniard       713-853-0558
		Harold Williams      713-345-8917

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


rite spot.  17th and folsom.  the best.

Best,
Jeff


Please include Bill Bradford if possible. Tx Rick


Ed and Mark,

As we discussed, I spoke to Jeff Hodge and Travis McCullough about the best
way to document this deal.  We all agreed that it is better to document the
deal as a deferred payment on the sale of natural gas rather than as a loan.
Documenting the deal as a loan does not add any protection for Enron and in
fact, may be detrimental because of the various laws concerning loans and
lenders.  The protections  and remedies afforded by the Master track those
that Enron would have under a loan document.  Enron would be in no better
position to collect from NUI in the event of bankruptcy under a loan document
than under the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.  Additionally, I assume
that NUI, being a regulated utility, will not want to or be able to document
this deal as a loan.

Please let me know if you need additional information on this topic.

Stacy


Hi Ashley!  A couple of things.  First of all, my new renter, Doug, wonders
whether he can just call the utilities & phone and transfer from his name to
yours (rather than you cancelling and him having to pay any re-hookup fees
that may apply).   I don't know how it would work; maybe he could conference
you in when he makes the calls.  For what it is worth, he is a very nice guy
to deal with, but it is totally up to you and I really don't care one way or
the other.

Also, I'm having someone come clean the place so you needn't worry about it,
in case you were wondering.  I will take care of it (it looks pretty clean
anyway!).

Please let me know your new address and I will send you your deposit refund
next week.

Merci!

Susan


Gerald:

The Restated Agreement looks fine to me.  Chris Hoekenga has not had an
opportunity to review it yet and might have some minor revisions once he
does; however, in discussing the issues with him, I believe you've adequately
addressed the concerns in this draft.

Since I won't be at the member's meeting next week, I'll try to take a look
at the other two documents you indicated are on the way as soon as I get
them.  That way I can at least let you know if I see any glaring issues.

Regards,
Lori


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Wall of Champs Is Up!   Some sites attempt to impress you with titles won by
the guys running the site.   I've found most people are just slightly more
interested in winning THEIR own league.   Footballguys.com is built on the
concept of giving YOU information to win YOUR league and tons of you have
done just that.

If you've made your playoffs or won your league, let the world know about
it.   We've got our Wall of Champs up and running and waiting for you.
Check it out here  http://footballguys.com/wall2001.cfm You can add your
team here http://footballguys.com/addwall.cfm   There's not much better than
flaunting your success in front of your league members...

Enjoy.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

Here's how I see the Passing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheets online at www.footballguys.com  for
exactly where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always
receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the
cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.   Jeff Garcia
may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on Kurt
Warner or Brett Favre, Garcia's your guy no matter who he's lining up
against.   The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in your box
when it comes to deciding between players.

Note:  I've used the player stats sorted by performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups. Stats are provided by Mike
Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.  http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.   The points scored by position data is from ESPN.com.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Passing Game Matchups to Avoid and Exploit

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that have struggled lately.

Cincinnati Passing Game vs Tennessee Defense

What a fitting way to wind down the season Sunday as Jon Kitna and Kordell
Stewart combined for 662 passing yards and 5 TDs.Kitna had 411 of those
yards.   Wow.   When you throw it 68 times, most every receiver will be
involved and that's what happened Sunday.   Peter Warrick was very active -
maybe the benching helped in week 15.   The Titans rank # 31 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks so this is enticing although
you have to wonder if Kitna can do it again.   For the year, Tennessee ranks
# 29 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 31 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.
Check the cheatsheets to see where we rank these guys but clearly, it's a
good matchup.

Denver Passing Game vs Indianapolis Defense

Griese only put up 142 yards passing Sunday but it was enough.   Expect him
to do better this week.   Rod Smith is of course, the man here and he'll do
well too.   The Colts rank # 30 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 27 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs
and # 27 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Indianapolis Passing Game vs Denver Defense

Manning came up small in the yardage department with under 200 yards Sunday
but he did run in one score.   Marvin Harrison is of course the clear cut go
to guy.   Manning's a competitor and you'd have to think he'll give a great
effort in the final week with nothing but pride to play for.   The Broncos
rank # 27 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 9 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 25 Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

St. Louis Passing Game vs Atlanta Defense

Mike Martz showed last week he'll let his guys play.   Regardless of the
playoff situation, I think you'll see Warner in for at least a half and
maybe much more.   And like Marshall Faulk, a half of Warner is better than
a full game from most other players.   Picking the WR is a lottery shot as
Holt, Bruce, Proehl, or Hakim are all liable to go off.   The Falcons rank #
26 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 30 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 30 Fantasy Points Allowed
to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that haven't been strong
lately.

Carolina Passing Game vs New England Defense

Can't imagine you're in week 17 with many Carolina guys on the roster.
Weinke did ok last week.   It's tough when you're upset about Isaac Byrd
possibly missing time but that's where they are.   Both he and Muhsin
Muhammad could miss the last game.   The Patriots rank # 28 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks so they're definitely vulnerable.
For the year, they rank # 22 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 20 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.   It's a good matchup simply because New England hasn
't been much on defense.   I have little faith in the Carolina players to
take advantage of the matchup though.

Chicago's Passing Game vs Jacksonville Defense

When you think it's going to be all Anthony Thomas, Jim Miller and the
passing game decided to show off.   Miller put up 252 yards and 2 TDs as the
Bears continued to roll.   Marty Booker continues to see lots more passes
than any other Bear although David Terrell seems to make the most of what he
's thrown.   The Jaguars rank # 10 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 19 Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 6 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Dallas Passing Game vs Detroit Defense

Quincy Morgan showed some very nice flashes Sunday hitting Joey Galloway
deep.   Galloway seems to be the WR of choice.   He's worth a gamble for
sure.   The Lions rank # 25 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last
4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and
# 29 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs so it's a nice matchup.   It all depends
on whether these guys have the talent to take advantage of it.   One more
thing, the Cowboys will be doing all they can to get Emmitt Smith his 1,000
yard season so that may be a factor.

Kansas City Passing Game vs Seattle Defense

Trent Green quietly carried some FF teams Sunday with 2 TDs and 294 yards.
Tony Gonzalez finally put together a game like we've been expecting.   He
saw 3 times as many passes as the WRs.   Maybe that'll continue this week.
The Seahawks rank # 24 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 23 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 16
Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Miami Passing Game vs Buffalo Defense

Jay Fiedler posted a couple of TDs with his 191 yards which isn't bad.
Chris Chambers, Jed Weaver and Oronde Gadsden all saw time but RB Travis
Minor seemed to be the primary receiver with 7 catches.   Look for him to be
used more as Lamar Smith struggles.   The Bills rank # 29 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 24
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 19 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New England Passing Game vs Carolina Defense

Tom Brady's had a week to get ready for the Carolina defense.   Two teams
going drastically different directions here.   Terry Glenn could continue to
make an impact and you know Troy Brown's ready.   The Panthers rank # 20 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 28 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 22 Fantasy Points Allowed to
WRs.

Seattle Passing Game vs Kansas City Defense

Hindsight is 20/20 but if Trent Dilfer isn't the most under appreciated
player in the NFL, I dunno who is.   He's won a jillion games including a
Superbowl lately and all he did Sunday was throw 3 TDs and save the Seahawks
season (at least for another week)   The big question is will he get another
shot?   Hasselbeck is saying he wants to play.  Stay tuned.   Darrell
Jackson went nuts last week and if Dilfer gets the nod, you have to look
hard at him.   The Chiefs rank # 18 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 15 Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 12 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

San Francisco Passing Game vs New Orleans Defense

Jeff Garcia threw for 229 and 2 TDs against a tough Cowboy pass Defense last
week.   Plus he rushed for another TD.   Terrell Owens is a must start.
J.J. Stokes is seeing lots of action and TE Eric Johnson is very involved.
The Saints defense ranks # 13 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 26 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs
and # 23 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Baltimore Passing Game vs Minnesota Defense

Elvis Grbac had Raven fans wondering about Trent Dilfer again last week with
205 yards and 2 Interceptions to go with his TD.   The usual suspects of
Qadry Ismail, Shannon Sharpe and Travis Taylor will all be active.   The
Vikings rank # 19 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 20 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 24 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

Green Bay Passing Game vs New York Giants Defense

Favre came up small last week with just 169 yards and 0 TDs.   Granted, it
was really cold, but that hasn't seemed to bother him much in the past.
Freeman and Schroeder got most of the looks as usual.   TE Bubba Franks saw
a handful thrown his way.   They'll face the banged Giant secondary this
week ranked # 14 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 18 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 28 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

New Orleans Passing Game vs San Francisco Defense

Aaron Brooks took a step back this week with 3 Interceptions vs 1 TD and
just 127 yards.   It's not good when Deuce McAllister is the leading
receiver but that's what happened Sunday.   Joe Horn and Willie Jackson came
up small.   This week, they'll face a 49er defense that's ranked # 16 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 13 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 17 Fantasy Points Allowed to
WRs.

Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Cleveland Defense

Stewart threw for 251 yards and 3 TDs Sunday although he did have 4
Interceptions.   Plaxico Burress is clearly the big play threat and is
showing shades of becoming a dominant WR.   Hines Ward is solid as well.
The Browns rank # 9 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 3 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 14 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

Tennessee Passing Game vs Cincinnati Defense

Steve McNair continues to play well with 274 yards and 2 TDs.   He's a
totally different QB when he throws the deep ball.   Although Eddie George's
re-emergence may quiet that a bit.   Dyson and Mason both saw an equal
number of passes and both scored.   This week, they'll face a Bengal defense
ranked # 12 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For
the year, they rank # 16 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 21 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

Washington Passing Game vs Arizona Defense

Tony Banks put up a whopping 94 yards passing last week.   But part of it
was the big lead Washington was able to post.   Westbrook left with an ankle
injury so Gardner and TE Zeron Flemister caught what was thrown.   This
week, they'll face a Cardinal defense that's been pretty good lately ranking
# 7 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 25 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 26 Fantasy Points Allowed
to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that's been pretty strong
lately.

Atlanta Passing Game vs St. Louis Defense

Mike Vick could see the start even if Chandler is ok.   The team is clearly
looking at 2002.   He's a dice roll if he starts but it's not like Chandler
was consistent.   Vick will likely spread the ball around to Terance Mathis,
Shawn Jefferson and Brian Finneran but it's tough to count on this team.
The Rams rank # 22 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 14 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 8 Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

Cleveland Passing Game vs Pittsburgh Defense

For the 2nd week in a row, Couch exploited a great matchup and lit up
Tennessee for 336 yards and 3 TDs.   Kevin Johnson was clearly the WR of
choice again.   This week, they'll face a Steeler defense that ranks # 15 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 7 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 7 Fantasy Points Allowed to
WRs.

Jacksonville Passing Game vs Chicago Defense

Mark Brunell put together another gritty day with 283 yards and a TD Sunday.
Keenan McCardell and Jimmy Smith continue to be one of the toughest WR duos
in the league.   They'll face a Bear defense this week ranked # 17 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   Clearly, the stats
don't quite back up their rep lately.   For the year, they rank # 8 Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 2 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs so they've been
stingy allowing FF points.

Minnesota Passing Game vs Baltimore Defense

Spergon Wynn could well be an NFL QB someday but today isn't that day.
Really puts the Cris Carter / Randy Moss owners in a bind.  Normally, they'
re sure starts but now I'm not so certain.   He really looked bad at times.
Both these receivers are guys who can make up for deficiencies at QB so I
still think you'll have to look hard there.   Plus, it's on Monday night so
even though the Vikes have pretty much packed it in, they'll probably put
forth a good effort.   The Ravens rank # 5 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 17 Fantasy Points Allowed
to QBs and # 18 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New York Giants Passing Game vs Green Bay Defense

Kerry Collins went over 300 yards last week and that was something.   Tiki
Barber is still the most frequent target with Toomer and Hilliard seeing
pretty much equal attention.   The Packers rank # 3 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last 4 weeks.  For the year, they rank # 12 Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 5 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New York Jets Passing Game vs Oakland Defense

Vinny Testeverde looked pretty old in the loss to Buffalo with 0 TDs and 2
Interceptions.   Chrebet and Coles are decent options but this team is all
about Curtis Martin.   Especially with the Oakland Corners.   The Raiders
rank # 8 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 10 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 13 Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

Oakland Passing Game vs New York Jets Defense

Rich Gannon had an excellent day with 313 yards and 2 TDs although he did
have the 2 Interceptions.   Jerry Rice and Tim Brown continue to play well
and Charlie Garner does a nice job catching the ball.   The Jets are in a
must win situation and rank # 11 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 1 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs
and # 4 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs so they've been tough.

Philadelphia Passing Game vs Tampa Bay Defense

Donovan McNabb started looking for receivers not named Duce Staley last week
and better things seemed to happen.   He threw for 3 TDs and nearly 300
yards.   James Thrash saw most of the passes while TE Chad Lewis burst back
onto the scene.   They'll face a Buc defense this week ranked # 6 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 11
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 9 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Philadelphia Defense

Brad Johnson is trying to set a dink and dunk record I think.   He had 90
yards passing on 29 attempts for an amazing 3.10 yards per attempt.
Keyshawn Johnson is still probably a starter but that's pathetic.   This
week, they'll face an Eagle defense that's ranked # 23 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 2
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 1 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a Defense that's been very strong
lately.

Arizona Passing Game vs Washington Defense

Start David Boston.   You already know that.   I'd say Plummer merits
consideration in lots of leagues too.   Boston again went nuts last week.
The Redskins rank # 4 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 5 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 11
Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   Even with this tough matchup, Boston is a
sure starter unless you're comically loaded at WR.

Buffalo Passing Game vs Miami Defense

Van Pelt threw for under 200 yards but the Bills did get the win.   It looks
to me like Jay Riemersma is the primary target now.   Eric Moulds and
Peerless Price are good gambles but far from sure things.   The Dolphins
rank # 2 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 6 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 10 Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

Detroit Passing Game vs Dallas Defense

Mike McMahon could miss another game which means Ty Detmer could start.
Sounds funny, but he put together one of the bigger days among QBs Sunday.
He threw the ball all over the field.  Johnnie Morton and Cory Schlesinger
were especially involved.   The Cowboys rank # 1 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last 4 weeks so it'll be tough.   For the year, they rank
# 4 Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 3 Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:28:26 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

linda.stepenovitch@bankofamerica.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain bankofamerica.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


Listed are the deals that have either been zeroed out or NW Delivered that has been moved to optimize the position:

246859.1, .2	Smurfit-Stone		0 volume	through September 16; then 7 flat September 17-30

more to follow tomorrow.

ds


As a reminder, paralegals should distribute guaranties as stated:

Incoming Guaranties:  Original to Leslie Campbell at EB2866, copies to file
and Anthony Campos.
Outgoing Guaranties:  Original to Counterparty, copies to Leslie Campbell,
file, and Anthony Campos.

All original distributions should be by hand delivery (internal) and courier
(external).

Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


The fame of the Research Department is spreading all over Europe!

Best regards,

Martina
---------------------- Forwarded by Martina Angelova/LON/ECT on 05/07/2000
15:29 ---------------------------

	Enron Information Technology

	From:  Enron Europe General Announcement                           05/07/2000
15:27

Please respond to European T&D/LON/ECT
To: ECT Frankfurt, ECT Helsinki, ECT London, ECT Madrid, ECT Oslo, ECT
Teesside, ECT Warsaw
cc:

Subject: Department Presentation, Friday 7th July, 8:45am

Maureen Raymond-Castaeda,
Senior International Economist, Research Department, Houston
will be presenting
Approach to Country Risk
Friday 7th July
8:45am - Breakfast and questions to Ms. Raymond-Castaeda
9:00am - Presentation will start
Enron House, Fifth Floor, Auditorium
It is not necessary that you book a place, however if you have any questions
please contact European T&D.


Revised copy of PDA.
Ben


;

YOU ARE INVITED!!!
It's November and again time for the Enron Litigation Unit's Annual Ethics Seminar. Please join us on Wednesday, November 7, at 4:00 p.m. at the Doubletree Hotel-Downtown Houston (LaSalle A) for University of Texas Professor John Dzienkowski's entertaining presentation. After Professor Dzienkowski's presentation ends at 5:00 p.m., please stay for an open bar and hors d'oeurves. The Unit is applying to the Texas Bar for one hour of ethics credit.
Please RSVP by email or phone to Becky Zikes at (713) 853-1843.


I'll touch base with the appropriate folks.

Regards,

Rob

"William G. Evans" <william.evans@citicorp.com> on 02/06/2001 12:21:40 PM
To: Rob Gay <rob.g.gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba-Milbank Legal

Rob

I just spoke to Mike Banks at Milbank who said payment has not yet been
received re: their invoice.  He has had some conversations with Robert
Novak and others at Enron and undertands that payment has been approved
but for some reason not yet made.  I would appreciate if you could look
into this to see what the status is.

Mike understands that we are in a holding pattern on the permanent
financing until the changes in the project are completed.

Regards
Bill


I can ask our Phoenix counsel if he can set up a meeting or give us an idea who can.  The head of APS transmission is an attorney (who actually represented us for a brief moment) who left Snell and Wilmer in June.  I can call him as well.  Dave, what does your schedule look like?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:01 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Nord, Sue
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

Let me know.  I'd talk with APS just to find out more details.  If we do, let's take Dave Perrino our wholesale guy to also talk about RTOs.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Nord, Sue
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

Let me cogitate on this.  The local counsel we use on electric matters is more of a gas attorney than an electric one, and the counsel we use for the SW Gas matters is also APS's counsel so he can't help us on these matters.  The customers are no allies, since they are happy with their deal, and the only other marketer who was active in the settlement is gone now (the internet marketer from California).  Perhaps we could talk to APS to see what they are thinking.  That might be more enlightening than anything else.  Just a thought.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:40 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Nord, Sue
Cc:	Porter, David V.; Keene, Patrick; Kaufman, Paul; Hinrichs, Lance; Kingerski, Harry; Frank, Robert
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

I would think that we should take the time to talk with local counsel or other "allies" to get a feel for the chances in AZ.  I also think that the difficulty in AZ will be a physical problem with getting transmission service - no RTO.

It would be great to have a thorough analysis of problems in every open market just to know what the issues are.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Nord, Sue
Cc:	Porter, David V.; Keene, Patrick; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Hinrichs, Lance; Kingerski, Harry; Frank, Robert
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

I have received 2 calls in the last two days from EES and ENA (Lance Hinricks and David Porter) wanting to know the details of AZ electric marketing.  They are apparently revisiting things there.  So here is my reaction to the APS filing, which I had not heard about.

It is my recollection that the spin off is part of the entire-ball-of-wax settlement approved by the ACC for the APS restructuring in 10/99.  Therefore they must have filed to reopen this settlement (which was not to be allowed, of course).  The settlement, while "opening" markets, effectively keeps them closed for lack of headroom until 7/04 at the earliest.  So, if there is a commercial interest in AZ, then this filing could give us a chance to jump back in and make the arguments we made back in 99 that the settlement would not result in competition (and it didn't - time has proved us 100% correct on that) and if APS wants to change the settlement, then the non-competitive terms should be amended as well.

That said, we do not get a great reception in AZ, and it is hard to say we would have any great chance of success.  The large customers do not mind that there is no competition because they have been on a mandated rate reduction path and saw none of the price run-ups that Californians and other westerners saw last winter (at least not yet).  We would have no one on our side.

SO, it is an opening, but I would let the commercial folks tell us how much it is worth to them, given the less than great odds.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Keene, Patrick; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	FW: APS Filing

Is this something in which you think we should be engaged?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Nord, Sue; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

No.  Talk with Pat Keene and/or Leslie Lawner.  We haven't done much on Arizona lately.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	APS Filing

Are we (or EPSA) taking an active role in the filing APS made with the Arizona Commission to use the unregulated affiliate of its parent as the wholesale provider of last resort?  (There's an article on the filing in today's Electric Power Daily that says they've filed to push back the requirement that they purchase 100% of their power from the competitive market by 2004 to a requirement that they purchase 25% of their power competitively by 2008).

Sue Nord
Senior Director
Government Affairs
713-345-4196


Brad,

I'm on dope. I was looking at the wrong bank statement. The $700 number
sounds correct. Can you sell that stuff for me please. I'll give you a cheque
this weekend to top up my RRSP.

Thanx,

Chris


FYI----------Here are the latest cuts:

6/16   Richardson on Oasis at El Paso
 97J4    was 6.0 now 5.385  (cut of 615)

 Burlington on Oasis at El Paso
 97J4 was 15.0  now13.461  (cut of 1.539)

 Exxon on Oasis at El Paso
 9J49 was 3.5   now  3.286  (cut of 214)

6/17 201K cut on Oasis at PG&E Waha
 WHO34  was 12.110   now 10.831   (cut of 1.279)

6/18 201K cut on Oasis at PG&E W
 WHO34  was 12.110  now 10.166   (cut of 1.944)


Samantha,
Please schedule an interview with this candidate,  Mark McCoy  713-369-9281
for Monday January 24th.
I would like him to interview with Daren Farmer, Gary Hanks, and yourself.  I
have already met with him outside
of the office.  He will also need some sort of briefing on benefits if that
is possible.  Please let me know if this
is ok.  Also keep in mind that he is currently employed and has limited
flexibility.  I believe that the date, January
24th is a good day for him.  I will be out of the office on jury duty but I
don't think that will be a problem. Thanks,
Pat Clynes   35578

Resume is attached.

MMccoy3617@aol.com on 01/16/2000 07:29:52 PM
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Document

Mr. Clynes:

Here is the document you requested.  Let me know if you have any questions or
require any additional information.

Sincerely,

Mark McCoy
713/369-9281

 - MRESUME.DOC


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Sara.
Goldman agreement.
sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 06:34
PM ---------------------------

"Mordini, Elisa" <elisa.mordini@gs.com> on 04/30/2001 03:49:49 PM
To: "'sheila.glover@enron.com'" <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc: ficc-nyfutlegal <ficc-nyfutlegal@ny.email.gs.com>, "Wenger, Lynsey"
<lynsey.wenger@gs.com>
Subject: Enron -- Goldman Sachs Futures Documentation

Sheila,

As requested by Lynsey Wenger, attached for your review and use is our
futures documentation (in pdf format).  Booklet I contains the actual
futures account agreement; Booklet II contains disclosures for your review
and retention.

I am providing you with the below checklist to facilitate your efforts in
gathering the appropriate supporting documentation to provide us when
opening a futures account.

  Supporting Documentation to be provided with fully executed
Futures Account Agreement

* IRS Form W-8 or W-9, as applicable, must be fully
completed/executed..

* Documents that authorize the use of futures and establish the
client's existence:

    For the corporation, a certified resolution,
internal investment guidelines and/or operating agreement.

    For a pension - a trust agreement.

* Audited financials.

* Signature authority (generally in the form of a resolution).

Please call me at 212 902-0861 if you have any questions.

 <<BOOK 1 MASTER JANuary 1999 (2).pdf>>  <<BOOK 2 MASTER FEB 2001.pdf>>
<<fw8ben.pdf>>  <<iw8ben.pdf>>  <<fw9.pdf>>

Elisa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Elisa Mordini
Legal Dept - Futures Services
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Tel:  (212) 902-0861
Direct Fax: (212) 428-1645
Dept Fax (212) 357-1049
elisa.mordini@gs.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information contained in this  message is sent
by an attorney or his/her agent and is intended only for the confidential
use of the above-named recipient.  The information may be protected by
attorney/client privilege or other legal rules.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this communication in error, and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender
immediately by telephone at the number set forth above, and destroy this
message.  Thank you.

 - BOOK 1 MASTER JANuary 1999 (2).pdf
 - BOOK 2 MASTER FEB 2001.pdf
 - fw8ben.pdf
 - iw8ben.pdf
 - fw9.pdf


John,

The only remaining points at issue concerning the GISB are as follows:

Section 1.2   change to "Oral".  As you may recall in our previous
discussion,  Enron will always send a written confirm.

Section 10.1 supplement:  Agree to purposed language save "two day",  please
revise to "5 business days".

If in agreement with changes above, please prepare final document and send
for our execution.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2000 10:24
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Taylor                           02/19/2000 03:14 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Derivatives Reference Entities

Here is the list of reference entities I received from Debbie with the
confidentiality agreements and the reference entities they relate to
indicated.  If the reference entity name is in bold we have a confidentiality
agreement with the entity itself. I notice that AOL, Nortel and Qwest are not
on the list (they were on the original list for actual trading sent to me) -
were they removed by you guys?

Reference Entity    Affiliate Confidentiality Agreements

AGL Resources Inc.

AT & T Corp.     AT&T Commercial Finance Corporation

Atlantic Richfield Company   US coal business of Atlantic Richfield Company

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

Bay State Gas Company

Bell Atlantic Corp

BellSouth Corp.

Boston Edison Company

Boston Gas Company

Burlington Resources Inc.

Carolina Power & Light Company

Central Illinois Light Company

Central Maine Power Company

Central Power and Light Company

Chevron Corp `    Chevron USA Inc.

Cinergy Corp.

Citizens Utilities Company

Columbia Energy Group    Columbia Energy Services Corporation
      Columbia Electric Corporation

Commonwealth Edison Corp

Commonwealth Electric Company

Conoco Inc.     Conoco Canada Limited

Consolidated Edison Inc    Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc.

Constellation Energy Group

Cox Communications Inc

Dayton Power and Light Company, The

DPL Incorporated

Dominion Resources Inc.   Dominion Energy Canada Ltd.

Dow Chemical Company    Dow Chemical Canada Inc.

DQE Inc

Duke Energy Corporation   Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.
      Duke Energy Power Services LLC

Duquesne Light Company

Dynegy Inc.      Dynergy Power Holdings, Inc.

El Paso Energy Corp    El Paso Electric Company
      El Paso Energy Marketing Company
      El Paso Field Services Company
      El paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
      El Paso Power Services, Inc.

Exxon Mobil Corporation   Exxon Pipeline Company
      Mobil Business Resources Corporation

Florida Power & Light Company

FPL Group Inc.     FPL Energy, Inc.
IDACORP Inc.

Idaho Power Company

Illinois Power Company

Lucent Technologies    Utilities Solutions Business of Lucent Technologies,
Inc.

Marathon Oil Company    Marathon Canada Limited

MCI World Com Inc.

Montana Power Company

Nevada Power Company

New Jersey Natural Gas Company

New York State Electric & Gas Corporation

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Occidental Petroleum Corp   Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.

Oklahoma Gas And Electric Company

Pacific Gas & Electric Company   Pacific Gas & Electric Corporation (same
entity?)
      PG&E Generating Company

Peco Energy Company

Pennzoil-Quaker State Company

Peoples Energy Corp    Peoples Energy Services Corporation

PG&E Corporation    how is this related to Pacific Gas & Electric Company?

Phillips Petroleum Company   Phillips Petroleum Co, U.K. Ltd.

Piedmont Natural Gas Co

Potomac Electric Power Company

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Sierra Pacific Power Company

Southern California Gas Company

Southern Company Inc    Southern Company Services, Inc.

Texaco Inc.     Texaco Limited
      Texaco North Sea UK Company

Texas-New Mexico Power Company

The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company

Ultramar Diamond Shamrock

US West, Inc.

Utilicorp United Inc.

Vastar Resources, Inc.

Virginia Electric and Power Company  Virginia Gas Co. (related?)

Washington Gas Light Company

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

Wisconsin Gas Company

Wisconsin Power And Light Company


More than 6,000 (more than 4,000 American citizens) innocent civilians have been killed in a brutal attack on our country and our way of life.  If that is not worth fighting for, then what in your opinion is?  I will admit, I am a conservative and therefore our opinions will usually be polarized on many issues.  I am glad that life in our country allows for dissent.  But I think that this right is worth the ulimate sacrifice.  I honestly believe that if we do not respond, and with calculated deadly force, that we ultimately lose.  And I am not talking about losing a war, but our freedom.  I agree with you that war will bring unintended consequenses, but these consequences in my opinion, are the price we must pay to defend our way of life.

Darron Giron


I apologize, but I can't make this call, though I'm confident that you folks
can handle it.  I'm available Friday afternoon (though I don't that will work
for Jim Steffes).  Let me know.

Best,
Jeff

	Wanda Curry@EES
	05/02/2001 10:07 AM

		 To: Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Diann
Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Follow up conference call

I have sent Janet Covington the participant list as requested per her e-mail
below.  She has agreed to set up the conference call for Thursday, May 3rd at
3 PM central time.  Please reserve this time.  I will forward each of you the
spreadsheet we receive from them today.  I will let you know if I think we
should get together to review the spreadsheet prior to the call.

Thanks,

Wanda Curry
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/EES on 05/02/2001 09:58
AM ---------------------------

Diann Huddleson
05/02/2001 08:01 AM
To: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Follow up conference call

Wanda, I spoke with Janet after you forwarded her voice mail.  I told her we
would provide the participant list this morning.  Let me know if you want me
to do that.

---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 05/02/2001
08:00 AM ---------------------------

Janet.Covington@sce.com on 05/01/2001 03:46:06 PM
To: dhuddles@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Follow up conference call

Hi Diann,

I just left a phone message for Wanda as I didn't have her email and was
supposed to coordinate the follow up call with her.  Anyway, we are still
working on preparing the account examples demonstrating the change in
methodology and should have those to you by tomorrow.  In the meantime, I
wanted to go ahead and arrange the follow up call for this Thursday 5/3 at
1pm PST.  That would be 3pm your time.  Can you please let me know the
email addresses for your participants so I can get a notice out to them.

I had yourself, Wanda Curry, Evan Hughes, Jeff Dodson, Bob Williams, Jim
Doth, and Martin Curtilan?  Not sure of the spelling.  Please let me know
so I can send out the meeting notice out with the call in details.

Thanks Much.

Janet L. Covington
Account Manager
ESP/AMS Services Division
SSID Administration Bldg., First Floor
7300 Fenwick Lane
Westminster, CA  92683
Phone: 714-895-0198 (54198)
Fax: 714-895-0347 (54347)
covingjl@sce.com


Good morning Amyn:

The Enron Corp. Research Group would like to conduct a telephone
interview with you at your convenience.   This will be as a "summer
Intern" with the Research Group.

Please let me know your availability on Monday, May 1st or Thursday;
May 4th.

The persons who will be interviewing you are:

Vince Kaminski  Managing Director
Stinson Gibner  Vice President
Krishna Krishnarao Director
Osman Sezgen  Manager

I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and have a great day

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
713-852-5290