We have received an executed Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated
effective as of September 20, 2000 between ENA and HS Energy Services, Inc.
This Agreement assigns an outstanding trade between HS Energy Services, Inc.
and Columbia Energy Services Corporation from Columbia to ENA.

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


Ben,

I'll take a look at it today, you night owl.  Hope the kids cut you some
slack after your late night.

You're missing our last week of nice weather for the season.  It was 65
degress this am.  I'm taking Herman to the game tonight, which will be
wonderful in this weather.  Next comes 90 degrees.

Michael had his first soccer practice yesterday - actually a skills
assessment to put them on teams.  He loved it. His big sister and her
boyfriend took  him to buy soccer clothes afterwards.  He is wearing his shin
guards and soccer shorts to school today.  Too cute.

Hope you are enjoying your little ones.

Kay


I'm ok assuming we have the posting verification data-  MK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Hartsoe, Joe; Miller, Mary Kay; Donoho, Lindy; Lohman, TK
Cc:	Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria
Subject:	Transwestern Response To CPUC Protest/ Docket No. RP97-288-017

Attached is a revised version of TW's response to the CPUC's protest. This version reflects comments received from Teb, Mary Kay, Greg and Maria. I apologize that the attachment is not red-lined. I'm having computer problems and have not been able to generate a red-lined version that accurately tracks the changes.

 << File: RP97-288 AnswerindC.doc >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Zipper, Andy
Subject:	FW: America's new weapon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moon, Eric
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	FW: America's new weapon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyt, Eric
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Fitzwater, Loftus; Diamond, Russell; Little, Kelli; Calcagno, Suzanne; Moon, Eric; Cramer, Chris
Subject:	FW: America's new weapon

[Boyt, Eric]  You have to turn up the volume a little

This just cracked me up.................................................

http://members.sigecom.net/theclan/Taliban.html


Greetings:

IEP will be making a FERC filing this week in response to the FERC staff
report issued in response to the ISO Market Stabilization plan.  We will
have a call tomorrow to discuss the proposed language we are currently
finishing drafting.

We will send out the language by COB today, please review it before the call
tomorrow. If your company is also drafting language please send a copy of it
to Andy ASAP.

The call will be tomorrow at 11:00 a.m. PST

The call in number is our usual number:
1-800-486-2726,
The participant code 120895

JUST A REMINDER THAT IF YOU HAVE NOT SENT IN YOUR COMMITTEE COMMITMENTS TO
CAROL (chudson@iepa.com) TO PLEASE DO SO ASAP!

As always, please let me know if you have any questions

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - winmail.dat


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacobson, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 1:10 PM
To:	Taylor, Michael E
Cc:	Keeler, Jeffrey; Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE: e-mail address

Dear Michael,

It was good talking with you too.  I look forward to working with you.  To get you started, I will email the presentation you sat through last week - it is long, but has a tremendous amount on useful info (especially the maps).  I am happy to answer questions or walk through parts of it when needed.

I will also send you some background material on our multi-emissions proposal.  Similarly, give me a ring is you have any questions.

Talk to you soon,

Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Jacobson, Lisa
Subject:	e-mail address

Lisa,

It was great listening and learning from you this morning.  Obviously you are going to be a wealth of information.

My e-mail address is michael.e.taylor@enron.com    (Just in case in is in a different form above)

I have mainly been focusing on NOx.  Very interested in anything concerning NOx.  I will be adding SO2 to my umbrella shortly.

A brief background on myself:

	Graduated Louisiana State University in Finance in May 2001
	Spent a few months at Microsoft Equity Trading Room and Gas Scheduling and Trading at Enron
	(Nothing related to Emissions at all)

Sincerely,
Michael Taylor


Joel has been negotiating with Open Text along with Ryan Orsak - as Enron has
been providing numerous resource hours testing their 'beta' product that
integrates Livelink with IRIMs for records management processes.  Our
experience has been that we are finding way too many problems and that the
product does not function as 'advertised'.  Therefore, Joel sought a credit
to reimburse Enron for the value of the testing we have performed for them.
The $30,000 software credit will likely be used to purchase the web front end
to the Livelink product.

Congratulations, Joel!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Henenberg, Joel
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Solmonson, Mary
Subject: Hoooooooray!

Mary, I am happy to say Open Text has agreed to a $60,000 credit for Enron.
Enron will receive this credit via $30,000 in software and $30,000 credit in
Professional Services.

Regards

Joel


Yes.  We are supposed to leave tomorrow.  Why?

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 02/15/2001 09:09:37 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: computer options

Eric,

Are you going to Vegas this weekend?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:21 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: computer options

yeah, they sent me some candy ass  "sorry" letter. no $ though

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 02/14/2001 12:37:32 PM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: computer options

Eric,

Did you ever hear back from America West?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: computer options

i havent heard anything yet - i will let you know though

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 01/18/2001 12:12:34 PM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: computer options

Eric,

Will you have any opportunities for Rodeo tickets through Enron?

Jason Bass
Compaq Portables
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:     Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:17 AM
To:  Bass, Jason
Subject:  computer options

Option 1 - laptop low end
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=PR700SON19&custo

mer_id=19&keycode=6V900

Option 2 - laptop high end
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=EG700UON19&custo

mer_id=19&keycode=6V901

Option 3 - desktop (free)
http://commerce.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.asp?order_code=LP866PO19&custom

er_id=19&keycode=6V903

what do you think?


http://www.adcritic.com/content/john-west-red-salmon-bear-fight.html

This is hilarious.
xox,
Al


Greg, Fitch is reducing credit ratings on the CA utilities, EIX and PCG,
Moody's is considering it. The news wire said PG&E(PCG) is going to be at 6
Billion by the end of December in the whole. More should be available in the
AM. Ben


Slight changes -
Make sure of course it is all on one page.  Check the spelling of
herschel-navy records are in the floor of the office.  Should only need 10
copies or so.

Have mike and denise sent us the money for the room yet?  Tickets to
Neville's?
PL


We regret to announce that with the reduced emphasis on developing large
infrastructure projects in certain countries, a number of individuals have
elected to leave Enron.  Diomedes Christodoulou, formerly Chief Commercial
Officer of Enron Broadband Services, James Bannantine, formerly CEO of Enron
South America, and Sanjay Bhatnagar, formerly CEO of Enron Broadband Services
for the Middle East and Asia, have elected to leave Enron to pursue other
opportunities.  Diomedes, Jim and Sanjay built and led strong and talented
teams at Enron.  We wish all of these individuals the very best in their new
endeavors.


Please see the e-mail below asking for production of the models created by
Enron separate from the McDonald models.  Enron's models were, I am told,
prepared within ECM by Paul Pizzolato  based on proprietary software of Enron,
something called "RAROC," risk adjusted return on capital.  Many iterations of
these models were run, varying different elements of data.

Brian and Ray Bowen have both stated that it is unlikely that these models
were retained Brian, Tom, and Kevin each testified in their depositions about
these models;
and the Farallon plaintiffs are now specifically asking about them.  Before we
say that these models no longer exist, I believe someone at Enron should make
an effort to look for them.  Frankly, it would probably be very helpful to
Enron's case if we could in fact find these models.  Right now our witnesses
and our expert are saying things about the models but, without the actual
models, this testimony is a bit self-serving.

Steve

................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................
 - Enclosed.txt


Paul is working on a credit sheet for Port Townsend for S. Klein.  This needs
to be coordinated with me when you get the worksheet.  Please advise when it
comes through.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Go ahead make fun!  But when I kick your ass in the NYC Marathon then who
will be making fun.  Spealing of Houston Enron Field opens up tomorrow
against the Yankees for a little pre-season game.  It is an incredible
ballpark.  When will you be back in the area?  See ya
Ben


Amy Oberg's brown bag, Coming Full Circle: A Plausible Future for Power
Generation has been cancelled.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.  Please keep watching for
future brown bags.


sandra cardoza
1411 38th Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94122-3009
greenbus@pacbell.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

sandra cardoza


Temp file until the IT group completes the Internet version.


ThinkBank went live with a bang last Friday!  The Idea Vault already has more
than 20 innovative entries, and the eThink team has been busy routing these
ideas to the right people.

There are ideas about everything from new trading opportunities to hot air
balloons.  Visit the ThinkBank today.  Got an idea?  Make a deposit.  Need
some help?  Make a withdrawal.

eMeet has a brand-new look.  Have you seen it yet?  We took your feedback --
thanks for posting it right there in eMeet -- and created a more dynamic and
informative site for you.  Check it out.  Go to eMeet now!

Don't miss Cindy Olson's eSpeak this Thursday, November 3 at 10:00 am Houston
time.  Cindy, executive vice president of Human Resources & Community Affairs
will be answering your questions about the new Enron employee stock option
program.
And, if you can't make the live event (all together now), be sure to
pre-submit your question(s) on the eSpeak site!

You know you have the stuff to increase Enron's competitive advantage.  Put
it in the Edge today.


see attached link for Saturday's LA Times article, "Consumers Seek Repeal of
Utility Deregulation":

http://www.latimes.com/business/updates/lat_power000729.htm


NYMEX Membership Services
March 19, 2001
Notice # MS-18

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 14, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

John D. Leahy (LAHY-4596)

Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-18)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


As you are aware, Enron utilizes temporary staffing services to satisfy
staffing requirements throughout the company.  For the past several months, a
project team, representing Enron,s temporary staffing users, have researched
and evaluated alternative Managed Services programs to determine which source
would best meet our current and future needs in terms of quality, performance
and cost containment objectives.  The Business Unit Implementation Project
Team members are:

Laurie Koenig, Operations Management, EES
Carolyn Vigne, Administration, EE&CC
Linda Martin, Accounting & Accounts Payable, Corporate
Beverly Stephens, Administration, ENA
Norma Hasenjager, Human Resources, ET&S
Peggy McCurley, Administration, Networks
Jane Ellen Weaver, Enron Broadband Services
Paulette Obrecht, Legal, Corporate
George Weber, GSS

In addition, Eric Merten (EBS), Kathy Cook (EE&CC), Carolyn Gilley (ENA),
Larry Dallman (Corp/AP), and Diane Eckels (GSS) were active members of the
Selection Project Team.

As a result of the team,s efforts, we are pleased to announce the beginning
of a strategic alliance with CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group.  This group
will function as a vendor-neutral management entity overseeing all staffing
vendors in the program scope. They will also provide a web based online
technology tool that will enhance the ordering and reporting capabilities.
The goal of our alliance with CORESTAFF is to make obtaining a temporary
worker with the right skills and experience easier while protecting the best
interests of the organization.

We plan to implement Phase I of this improvement effective January 2, 2001.
This Phase I of the implementation will encompass administrative/clerical
temporary workers at the Houston locations only. If you currently have
administrative/clerical temporary workers in your department, the enhancement
will not affect their position. In an effort to preserve relationships, all
current staffing vendors will be invited to participate in this enhanced
program.  CORESTAFF shares our commitment to minimize any disruptions in
service during this transition.

We expect to incorporate the administrative/clerical workers in Omaha,
Seattle and Portland in Phase II, which is scheduled for February, 2001.  The
scope and timing of any additional phases will be determined after these two
phases have been completed.

Realizing the impact that the temporary workforce has in business today, we
selected CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group based on their exceptional
management team, commitment to quality service, and creative solutions to our
staffing needs.  The relationship promises to offer Enron a cost effective
and simple means for obtaining temporary employees.

In the coming weeks, Enron and CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group will be
communicating to Enron,s administrative/clerical temporary staffing vendors
about the new process.

There are many benefits to this new Managed Services program, which are
outlined on the attached page.  More details on how to utilize CORESTAFF,s
Managed Services program will be announced soon and meetings will be
scheduled to demonstrate the reporting system and to meet the Managed
Services team.

What is Managed Services?

CORESTAFF,s Managed Services program includes:

? Vendor-neutral management model
? Equal distribution of staffing orders to all staffing partners
? Web-based application with online ordering, data capture and customized
reporting
? Benchmarking and performance measurement for continuous improvement
? Methodologies for accurate skill-matching and fulfillment efficiencies

Key Benefits

? More vendors working on each order from the outset ) faster access to
available talent pools
? Standardized mark-ups and fees to manage costs more effectively
? Online access to requisition status for users
? Robust databases offering managers enhanced tracking and reporting of
temporary usage and expenditures
? Standard and customized reporting capabilities -- online
? Tenured, experienced Managed Services team on-site to assist users in
accessing web site, identifying usage trends, preparing specialized reports,
etc.

Corestaff/Managed Services/Staffing

Joseph Marsh ) Lead / Operations (josephm@corestaff.com; 713-438-1400)
Amy Binney, Sharon B. Sellers ) Operations
Cherri Carbonara ) Marketing / Communications
Cynthia Duhon )Staffing Partner management


I do remember this deal, we were forced to bookout by some a-hole at pinwest because of the disaster and our inability to secure a scheule from DYPMI and Morgan who was upstream of AEP who was scheduling from home (as was I).  Tom  did the deal with Pinwest our buy for $40, and I did the deal with DYPMI our sale at Index.  I told the SW guys about this the following day, and in the mayhem, the deals probably did not get put in.  Holden and Tom and Mark were all aware of this at the time, and one of them may have also modified our deal with DYPMI.

They can throw those deals in, or I can.  Just let me know.

Cara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Purcell, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Semperger, Cara
Subject:	Sept 12 Pinnacle deal

Cara,

I have a dispute  from Pinnacle West for Sept 12 at $40.  I've checked the sheets and the deal is in the sheet, but there is no deal number.  This leads me to believe that there isn't a deal in Enpower.  The deal is PV HV and Staci remembers the problem.

Let me know when we can talk about this

 thanks

Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297


Just a little humor for your life.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melissa Nixon
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 5:02 PM
> To: Carolyn Ashley
> Subject: FW: FW: granny
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cheryl Brower
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 2:55 PM
> To: Gay Tidwell; Glenn Martin; Mary Morris; Melissa Nixon; Nessie
> Ramirez
> Cc: 'skneepete@aol.com'
> Subject: FW: FW: granny
>
>
>
> Cheryl Brower
> Purchasing Secretary
> Phone: 713/670-2461
> Fax: 713/670-2465
> E-mail: cbrower@poha.com
> PHA Web Site: http://www.portofhouston.com
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Paula Siska
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:29 PM
> To: Beth Schacherl; Bobby King; Brian Doolittle; Carol Walker; Cheryl
> Brower; Chris Sappington; Darrick Givens; Harold Matthews; Kathy Swift;
> Lynda Scayola; Martha Goolsby; Mary Morris; Nessie Ramirez; Olga Rios;
> Rebecca Case; Sarah Barnett; Tonya Lenoir; Tracy Richey; 'Denny'; 'Kimbo
> Driscoll'
> Subject: FW: FW: granny
>
>
>
>
>   <<GRANNYL[1].mpeg>>

 - GRANNYL[1].mpeg


Bob:

I think the RFP looks great.  The one question I had was whether or not we
wanted to put in the RFP our objective in terms of income from the facility.
Also, should we encourage joint bids?  Take care.

Mark


Please print in color for me.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 05:48 PM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
04/05/2001 04:53 PM
To:	Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:	Peoples presentation

Sally, Bob  FYI (or your files) - here is the presentation I gave to the Peoples Energy Board of Directors.

Let me know if you have any questions - Bob


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

1. I'm on the same page as Janice with regard to testing, although I'd like
to spin out my thoughts a bit.  In my view, at the end of the day, it is
virtually inevitable that both D3605 with ashing and D3605 without ashing are
going to be used on the critical loadport sample (and, therefore, for the
rest of the samples as well ) at the joint analysis.

 Mitsubishi's strategy at the joint analysis will be to get the remaining
loadport sample to come up off-spec on retesting, for obvious reasons.

 Prior to the joint analysis, Mitsubishi will be aware that (a) D3605 without
ashing is in the FGH contract and that (b) ECT believes D3605 without ashing
may have a reproducibility issue with this type of product.  Given this, if
ECT proposes to use only D3605 with ashing (our safest bet) on the loadport
sample at the joint analysis, Mitsubishi will smell a rat and insist on D3605
without ashing.   The same would apply, I think, if even if ECT proposed to
use only D3605 without ashing as its sole test at the joint analysis.  The
more different kinds of tests Mitsubishi can forcefully argue should be run,
the more likely it is that one of them will show the loadport sample is
off-spec.  Mitsubishi's goal will be supported by the general practice of the
chemists involved, who will want to rerun every test previously run in order
to get to the bottom of this.

 My sense is that it would be very difficult under the circumstances for ECT
to credibly take the position that only one test or the other (D3605 with
ashing or D3605 without ashing) should be run; in fact, in light of what I
believe is virtually inevitable (Mitsubishi insisting on whatever test we
don't propose), and in order to keep from appearing to be overly concerned
about the reproducibility problem, my feeling is that we may want to go ahead
and propose both tests to Mitsubishi (assuming that it is expected that we
would initially propose the proper tests to Mitsubishi, and not the other way
around).

2. Can you let us know exactly who will be doing the hands-on testing of this
product in Singapore?  I know that we nominated SGS Singapore, but does this
necessarily mean that someone from SGS will be doing the actual work, as
opposed to us just using SGS's lab?  As Janice pointed out, we need to make
absolutely sure that (a) the lab is first-class and (b) whoever performs the
test this time is very experienced with D3605 with and without ashing.  Also,
it is my thought that we do not want anyone from SGS there who is aware of
the pre-sale analysis that SGS did of the Elang Crude cargo.  This latter
point, especially, needs to be handled with great care; if there is a need to
communicate with SGS about any of this, I would suggest that you first confer
with David or Neal.

Many thanks for your help.

      Britt

 Again, many thanks for your help.

      Britt

----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/10/2000 03:18 PM -----

	Janice R Moore@ECT
	08/10/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: D3605/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT
Matt:
I agree w/ Britt that we need to know more about what testing has been done,
but I would think that the joint test should be conducted using the same
method used at loadport (regardless of whether ashing is proper or not).  Not
for the reason you mention (Mitsubishi may well argue about "proper"
rejection, but that's not likely a viable argument, since the fact is that
First Gas rejected the cargo and the dirt spec alone was sufficient grounds
for that rejection), but for the sake of consistency.  It doesn't matter at
all to First Gas what test methods were used or will be used on this cargo --
it's no longer any of their concern.  It's Enron's risk and sole
responsibility to deal w/ costs following rejection -- per the contract.  I
hope that we are not informing First Gas about anything that has happened or
will happen on this cargo (I noticed a note from Jon Russell inquiring about
the cargo -- I trust that we have politely refused to tell them anything).
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)

	Britt Davis@ENRON
	08/08/2000 09:30 AM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: D3605/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue.  I will confer with Janice and one of
us will get back to you.

Meanwhile, I think I may need further clarification about  what testing
methods were used by SGS at loadport and at discharge in Thailand and the
Phillipines.  My key area of concern is whether (as now appears unlikely from
your e-mail) SGS tested using both ASTM D3605 without ashing and ASTM D3605
with ashing at all the relevant points, and whether the test results were
consistent; e.g., whether the product was on-spec for both methods
immediately before loading, but off-spec for both methods at discharge in
Thailand and the Phillipines.  May I impose on you to provide one summary
chronology of the analysis done at loadport and both discharge ports, with
particular emphasis on (a) whether both testing methods (ASTM D3605 without
ashing and with ashing) were used, and the results, and (b) the results for
filterable dirt? (You have just sent something like this for the Thailand
cargo only, which I found very helpful).   Also, if SGS or anyone else has
made comment about the reliability or unreliability of the filterable dirt
analysis (or any other aspect of the testing done by SGS of this cargo),
please let me know about that as well.

I appreciate your good help.

    Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:39 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: D3605

Dear Janice / Britt

I know that Janice has kindly agreed to return to the team to advise and
coordinate with Mike Brown's team and myself in regard to the D3605 issue,
whilst I am to look to Britt's guidance for the contamination on the Elang
cargo. My apologies therefore for mixing the issues for the puposes of this
e-mail.

The joint testing of samples of the Elang cargo is planned to take place end
next week. The joint testing would include metals as well as filterable dirt,
so we would need to decide, in quite short order, on the test method we want
to propose for metals for relevant parties to agree.

Although we believe the contamination would be dramatically demonstrated by
the level of filterable dirt, the metals clearly would also be an important
factor. As you may be aware, the loadport sample results which we are
presently relying on to say that the cargo was on spec when loaded, was
tested with "ashing" for metals. We would not be able to say whether another
loadport sample would test on spec for metals using straight D3605. If it
doesn't test on spec at the joint testing using straight D3605, the vessel
owners would surely argue that the cargo would have been rejected by First
Gas anyway, independent of the filterable dirt. Although such as argument may
not defeat our case entirely, it is very likely to impact on the quantum we
would be able to recover.

It seems that the preferred test method for metals at the joint testing would
therefore be "ashing" to avoid conflict with existing loadport sample
results. We still have SGS's support for that, but we need to convince Minton
Treharne who acts for the cargo underwriters as well as the Owners/P&I Club.
Still, just in case details of our dispute with Mitsubishi become known to
Firts Gas, we may wish to avoid proposing a test method for joint testing
that would be inconsistent with the one we ultimately present to First Gas,
which for obvious long term objectives ought to be the CORRECT test method
acceptable to parties whether D3605 or "ashing" or some other method. That
said, I think if we are able to go with "ashing" for the joint testing, it is
not likely to jeopardize our position with First Gas.

I note Janice's preference for US experts over European experts for the D3605
issue. Have we been able to get any US experts' view on the right test to use
(whether D3605 or "ashing")? Has Enron formed a view on the "correct" test
method? If we have been able to source a "friendly" US expert, we may want to
have his input for the contamination issue.

Your views and guidance would be most appreciated.

Thanks and regards
Matt

I also note Janice's preference to source for US experts to assist us on the
D3605 issue over European experts and was wondering whether we have been able
to for


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
SCIENTECH IssueAlert Sponsor:

Energy Exchanges Online - Scottsdale - December 4-6: the only place to
meet your future clients, suppliers and partners.  SCIENTECH has secured
a $300 discount for all IssueAlert subscribers to participate to this event.
 To join Altra, HoustonStreet, Petrocosm, APX, Enron, Conoco, Duke plus
a legion of other online energy experts visit www.eyeforenergy.com/xonline.
This is the only event to take you from yesterday to tomorrow TODAY!
*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 21, 2000
Dynegy and NRG Energy to Purchase Sierra Pacific Assets
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Dynegy (NYSE: DYN) and NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG) announced a major expansion
of their co-owned generation portfolio in the West through asset purchase
agreements to acquire 1,330 MW of power generation facilities from Sierra
Pacific Resources (NYSE: SRP).  The facilities include the 740 MW gas-fired
Clark Generating Station and 590 MW of the 605 MW, coal-fired Reid Gardner
Generating Station. The facilities are currently owned by Sierra Pacific
Resources' subsidiary, Nevada Power Company, and serve the growing Las
Vegas market.

ANALYSIS: This $634 million purchase has resulted from regulatory mandates
surrounding the Sierra Pacific-Nevada Power merger, which was completed
in July 1999. Sierra Pacific is undergoing the sale and transfer of all
of its remaining gas, oil and natural-gas fired Nevada generating assets,
which it intends to complete in 2001.

The Reid Gardner and Clark Stations are among the seven asset bundles that
were included in an auction by Sierra Pacific earlier this year. Located
in southeastern Las Vegas, the Clark Generating Station consists of 10
gas- and oil-fired generating units, which as noted total 740 MW. The oldest
unit at the Clark Generating Station became operational in 1955, the newest
in 1994. Specific information about which units at the Clark Generating
Station are included in this purchase was not available. The Reid Gardner
Generating Station consists of four baseload coal-fired units and is located
52 miles northeast of Las Vegas. According to recent data from the Energy
Information Administration, the California Department of Water Resources
owns about 68 percent of the Reid Gardner Plant. It is not clear what impact
the Dynegy / NRG purchase will have on this organization's ownership in
the plant.

The purchase of the Sierra Pacific assets is subject to approval from the
Federal Trade Commission, FERC and the Nevada Public Utilities Commission,
and is expected to close during the second quarter of 2001. Additional
conditions of the deal include a power purchase agreement for Nevada Power
to buy energy and ancillary services from Dynegy and NRG "at a stable price"
until March 2003.

On their own, both companies are leaders in independent power production
and energy supply. Yet this acquisition is the latest in a string of
collaborative
efforts between Dynegy and NRG. Together, the companies have been actively
acquiring power plants in Illinois and the West Coast, along with purchases
that they have made independently. In fact, this purchase of assets from
Sierra Pacific marks the sixth asset alliance between Dynegy and NRG.
Together,
the two companies jointly own 2,768 MW of power generation facilities in
California and 350 MW in Illinois. In most of the partnerships, and in
the case of this latest purchase from Sierra Pacific, Dynegy markets the
energy produced at the plants and oversees fuel management services, while
NRG manages the operational side.

Last July, Dynegy and NRG entered into a similar agreement to expand the
Rocky Road Power Plant, a natural gas-fired, simple cycle peaking facility
in East Dundee, Illinois. The move into Illinois was an important strategy
for both companies. Of course, Dynegy completed its merger with Illinova
last summer, creating a $22 billion company that is well-positioned to
compete in electric generation, wholesale and retail marketing, and gas
and electric power trading. At the time, the CEO of NRG Energy made it
clear that the Rocky Road plant expansion was part of the two companies'
strategy in becoming a large contributor to the Chicago-area energy market.
Dynegy, in fact, intends to continue acquiring and expanding generation
facilities in Illinois so that it can compete with Exelon Corp.

Moreover, both companies are positioning themselves to be leaders in
generation
capacity and power supply, and the purchase of the 1,330 MW from Sierra
Pacific factors in to both of their strategies. Not only does the acquisition
help to expand both companies' asset base, but it also diversifies their
power supply offerings. For instance, NRG claims that the assets complement
its current gas-fired peaking and intermediate California assets, providing
the benefits of fuel and dispatch level diversification. NRG aims to build
a "top three position in its primary markets." The acquisition of assets
from Sierra Pacific puts NRG into a prime position in the fast-growing
Nevada and Western markets by adding a strong component of baseload generation
to its portfolio.

In fact, this is the second acquisition that NRG has made from Sierra Pacific.
Just last month, NRG announced its intent to purchase a 50-percent interest
in the Valmy Power Station, which Sierra Pacific is selling also as a result
of regulatory mandates. The Valmy Power Station, which is primarily
coal-fired,
produces electricity in the northern Nevada and surrounding markets. In
this $273 million deal, NRG acted as an independent buyer.

Dynegy has long claimed that it wants to gain a 10-percent share, or 70,000
MW, of the U.S. electric market over the next five year by acquiring plants,
building them or negotiating the right to sell power produced by others.
In order to reach this goal, I had projected last summer that Dynegy might
be looking to merge with another provider to build its scale, considering
the fierce competition it faces from other generation companies. The company
has now taken a different path to achieve essentially the same result.
The addition of Sierra Pacific's facilities, combined with other assets
that the company has acquired or developed this year, increases Dynegy's
generating capacity by more than 4,000 gross megawatts. Dynegy contends
that this figure is comparable to many industry mergers without the regulated
transmission and distribution businesses. Dynegy also believes the acquisition
will support a raise in its earnings forecast for 2001, from $1.75 to $1.80
per share.

Dynegy's goals are pretty ambitious. However, the company has been increasing
earnings over the last year, so the $1.80 per share target may be attainable.
For 3Q 2000, Dynegy reported recurring net income of $176.5 million, or
55 cents a share, compared with Dynegy / Illinova pro forma recurring net
income of $96.5 million, or 32 cents per share, for the same period last
year. Much of this growth is coming from Dynegy Marketing and Trade, whose
reported net income increased to $141.9 million*80 percent of the company's
consolidated net income. There is little doubt that Dynegy and NRG,
considering
that they own 2,768 MW of power in the state, benefited from the short
supplies in California this summer, which*along with other factors*drove
up the cost for power in the state.

Another interesting element to this announcement is the fact that similar
strategic acquisitions are being made possible by mandated divestiture
that other companies have faced due to merger activity. Just yesterday,
I wrote about Duke and Williams embarking on a joint venture to purchase
the Gulfstream pipeline project from Coastal Corp. This sale was made possible
because Coastal is being forced to divest the pipeline as a result of its
merger with El Paso Energy. As the old adage goes, one company's loss is
another company's gain, which could be viewed as one of the drawbacks of
M&A activity. Another possible trend is the joint activity we are seeing
between companies. The Duke / Williams  and Dynegy / NRG projects are both
examples of companies that have collaborated on development and acquisition
ventures to support both their joint and individual strategies. As the
energy industry becomes more competitive, like-minded companies may find
that they can actually gain more by developing similar strategic alliances,
rather than following a insular path typically exemplified by, for example,
Southern Company.
===============================================================
Read SCIENTECH's free SourceBook Weekly article: "AES: SourceBook's Company
of the Year," at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "remove" in the subject line.


We have received an executed financial master agreement:

Type of Agreement:		ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:			June 4, 2001

Enron Entity:			Enron Canada Corp.

Counterparty:			Encore Energy Solutions, L.P.

Transactions Covered:		Approved for all transactions with the exception of:  Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:		Enron Canada Corp.

Governing Law:			Alberta

Special Handling Requirements:	No special handling requirements

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


Kinko's wants their pricing refreshed for their Reliant and TXU sites only.
I need to know the fixed $MWh price if we assume a 50% renewable product in TXU
and a 100% renewable product in Reliant's service area.
I am trying to fill out the attached template that Larry sent to me with my gen only price refreshed,
some Price to beat estimates I ran for him and your new renewable power quotes.
Thanks
Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
02:16 PM ---------------------------
From: David P Dupre/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 09:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Presentation

Greetings:

When you have an opportunity, please forward a copy of your presentation to
me at
David.P.Dupre@enron.com at the GARP conference in January.

Thanks
David
3-3528


Steph, why did you have two tickets for L.A....    and why will one be used for Future travel?

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - September/October expenses

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Stephanie W. Miller
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: September/October expenses
Report Total: $3,320.40
Amount Due Employee: $3,320.40

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Enron Principal Investments (EPI), which was formed in the 2nd quarter, has completed its integration and the development of its new strategy.  This group will be responsible for identifying, closing, managing and exiting all non-E&P equity investments for Enron worldwide.  Kevin Garland will lead EPI, which includes Barbara Paige, Andrew Marsden, Kevin Kuykendall, Steven Sheldon, Michele Nezi Marvin and Mark Gandy.  Additionally, Dick Lydecker and the Special Asset Group will continue to report to Kevin.

EPI will pursue investments related to Enron's core businesses, where Enron has a unique insight into the market, company or technology.  Initially, this will be geographically focused in North America and Europe.  This group will rely heavily on the support and cooperation of the core business units to provide information and market insight.

EPI may make investments in the form of venture capital, leverage buyouts, growth equity, or private equity in public companies.  The group will not make investments in seed stage companies, other funds, subsidiaries of larger corporations, or project equity.

Please join me in supporting the efforts of Enron Principal Investments.


http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=394187

i wonder what is wrong with this place

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 01/24/2001 10:25:51 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Welcome to www.har.com! (3)

good neighborhood.? rather small but worth a  look?

?http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?MLNUM=544913
 - Welcome to www.har.com! (3).url


Beth Bentivoglio just called. She is sending the last two books in the Narnia
Chronicles.

Other ideas:

CD's by the group "Bewitched"  I think there may be 2 or 3 (according to
Katie). Her first choice is "Bewitched", the first CD.

A "blow pen" set. It would be in the artwork area of toy stores--they are
pens that you blow the ink out of onto stencils to make pictures.

Picked the names yet?  Missed you at Nancy's.

And, we would be delighted to host Christmas here.  Looking forward to it.

Debbie


The first product looks good.  We need to consider having one product for
parks and loans.  I think we should make a market in this product.  Let me
know what you think.  Has Laura decided which organization will flip the
deals?


Congratulations on your added role of Chairman and CEO of ENA.  I didn't
realize that when I said hello in the elevator last week that we would be
seeing more of you in Houston.  I look forward to working with you when you
arrive.


Gary, I have not heard much more on this issue - are you ok with this?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000
08:54 AM ---------------------------

John Sherriff
06/15/2000 12:51 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft Organization Announement

It looks like we have agreement on the change below but before we send this
out can you please review and comment:

In order to streamline all of our commercial credit trading activities
globally, Jeff Kinneman's Debt Trading team has been merged with
EnronCredit.com.  All global credit trading and EnronCredit.com activities
will co-headed by Jeff Kinneman in Houston and Bryan Seyfried in Europe and
the group will report to John Sherriff - CEO of  Enron Europe.

We wish both Jeff and Bryan well in their expanded roles.


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042705.txt


I meant to copy you guys on this
----- Forwarded by Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 02:06 PM -----

	Sandi M Braband
	10/10/2000 09:54 AM

		 To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Cornhusker

Rick,
Bob Hall, Daren Farmer and I met on Thursday regarding the fee--I have a very
rough draft done and my plan is to revise and edit today and tomorrow.
However, I  spoke with Dan Lyons yesterday regarding some issues with the
supply contracts that concerned me and he agrees that we need to look into
them further. In addition, Bob Hall, Daren and I thought we might could use a
brief tutorial on the structure of the transaction generally, the parties
involved and their correct legal names and their relationship to Enron. Dan
Lyons has volunteered to give us that tutorial but will not be available
until early next week when he and I will meet to discuss the supply contract
issues as well. Call me if you have any questions--

Sandi
ext. 35465

	Garrick Hill
	10/10/2000 07:54 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Mazowita/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Cornhusker

Where are we on the gas agreement for the Cleburne plant?


As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax
forms directly over the Internet for free.

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax tax
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide this
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 data
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also,
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in the
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX), the
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encryption
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?
A.  Only employees using Intuit,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and filing
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax software
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000(does this still work?
A. Yes, all copies of TurboTax 2000 contain the Automated Tax Return service
option.

Q. Overall what are the Benefits to me?
A.  Using the ATR service provided by Intuit and ProBusiness, you can:
? Increase your probability of accurate filing.
? Eliminate the need to manually enter your W-2 information and other
financial data.
? Increase the overall speed of tax filing.


We have received an executed Termination Agreement between Enron North
America Corp.  ("ENA") and Classic Resources, Inc., effective as of  February
15, 2001.  This Termination Agreement terminates (1)  the ISDA Master
Agreement dated as of September 3, 1999 between ENA and Classic Resources and
(2)  the Enron Corp. Guaranty.  All financial trades transacted under the
Master Agreement have expired and all obligations thereunder have been
fulfilled.

Copies will be distributed.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Body Shop/HR/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 05:22 PM ---------------------------
From:	Lee Wright/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/18/2001 04:31 PM
To:	Body Shop/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	BS Anniversary Winners

Congratulations
15th Year Anniversary Body Shop Drawing Winners
?	Two Continental or American Airline Tickets
	 Donated By Enron Travel and Transportation
	Richard Causey
?	(2) 30-Minute Massages
	Donated By Massage, Body & Soul
	Thomas Donohoe & Cynthia Wulfson
?	(2) Enron Gym Bag
Angela Puente & Rainer Cockell
?	(2) Sony Walkmans
Steven M. Harris & Alejandra Chavez
?	(4) Body Shop T-Shirts
Airam Artegga, Joseph Capasso, Phillip Conn, Dale Surbey
?	(2) Enron Tank Tops
Stacy Bolton & Merlin Moseman
?	(15) 15th Year Anniversary Shirts
Jeffrey Richter, Allan Karels, Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert, Robert S. Smith,
Gary Bode, Murat Sunar, John Pena, Connie Lee, Sally Shuler, Jeffrey Baldwin, Brant Reves, Chenee Franklin, Wade Nelson, Nora Lopez, Tony Miller

Please pick-up your Body Shop 15th Year Anniversary Prize from
Jennifer Mendez, Office Manager in the Body Shop at x37135
on Monday, May 21st, 10am - 4:30pm.


Hey Girl,

Sorry about last night, remember I told you I was looking for my NyQuil, well
I found it and took a couple of swigs and went straight to sleep.  I really
meant to call you back, but could not wake up.  I finally woke up around
11:30 and got up and got a drink of water.

By the way, the latest, unconfirmed rumor, is that Samatha and Anessa Hall
Joseph are supposed to be pregnant!

See you!


Tana :

Re: Public Service Co. of Colorado. I believe it may be an error that they
are still listed in the ENA Legal Online Database as being able to trade
"power w/ limits" .  The email below shows that they should be wide open
now..... at least from Legal's point of view.

Thanks,

Shari

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 02:54 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	08/28/2000 05:01 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/28/00

Tana:

The following CP is allowed to trade both US East and West power products
pursuant to the Master Energy Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of Oct.
26, 1999. (I ok'd this w/ Leslie):

Public Service Company of Colorado

**************************

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

Koch Global Bandwidth Services, Inc.-  Restricted by Credit
Texas Aromatics, Inc.-  Restricted by Credit
Venoco, Inc. - Restricted by Credit

Thanks,

Shari


Molly,

I would like to invite this student for an interview,
sometimes in late December when things slow down.

Interviews with all my direct reports and George Hopley.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
10/24/2000 04:07 PM
To: Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Rajnish,

We shall invite you for  an interview in Houston.

Vince

Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC


Gil,

Note that our forward curves for Transco Zone 5 (summer only) show a basis of
$.42.  Assuming a $5.00 gas price, the commodity and fuel is $.2437 making
Piedmont's capacity worth $.1763.  So Keith's current bid of $.19 is in the
ballpark.  I'm still waiting to hear back from LG&E.   Southern Co. plans on
getting back with me on this early next week as is Tenaska/PECO as you know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001
07:04 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sandy Olitsky @ ECT                           01/31/2001 10:20 AM

To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Transco Z4/Z5 curves for Piedmont

Phil:
You were so right.  Sorry about that.  Attached is the corrected version.
Thanks.
Sandy


Dear Team,

I added some stuff, including the equations, to Dennis's PS#5 to make it
look like the Professor's (page 11 of the Project Management handout). I
printed out the equations using the control-tilda, too.

I also spent some time with Problem 1 from the team handout. I made at
least one important change - only using one bearing size that is then
calculated with shaft sizes for both current and proposed. I had a lot
of trouble with the precision on the graphs (only 2 digits after the
decimal), so I made pass/fail criteria (i.e. IF .005<bearing size-shaft
size<.009, returns a 1=pass, else 0=fail). I made these into report
cells too. I also made another report cell that compares the success of
the two methods - this is getting at question 3. It basically determines
if there is ever a time that the current method gets success when the
proposed method gets failure (I came up with 8.7% on 1000 runs).

Let me know what you think. See you tonight.

Pat

 - REPORT 1.xls
 - PS
 - problem 1.xls


Tennessee Gas Pipeline expected rehab thru October 2000
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

"Alleman, Alden" <AllemanA@EPEnergy.com> on 04/20/2000 04:48:18 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: UPDATE: RESTRICTIONS, SEALS, AND OUTAGES THROUGH OCTOBER 2000

APRIL 20, 1999         4:00 PM CCT

TO:   ALL TENNESSEE CUSTOMERS

RE:   UPDATE: RESTRICTIONS, SEALS, AND OUTAGES THROUGH OCTOBER 2000

This notice updates the RESTRICTION, SEALS AND OUTAGES notice posted on
April 11.  Projects that have changed are preceded with "***" and the change
from the April 11 posting.   One project has been added.

Tennessee has planned the following activities between now and October 31
that may result in restrictions, seals or meter outages.  Some of these
projects are in the planning stages and may be altered or postponed.
Tennessee will inform you of any material change at least 15 days in
advance.

***Project postponed until May 15 to May 19.
Pipeline rehab on Line #823X-2100 (Upstream of Pecan Island, Southwest
Louisiana).
-- From May 15 to May 19, nominations will not be accepted for meters
011308, 011985.

Valve Change out on the Rollover Lateral (Upstream of the Grand Chenier
Plant, Southwest Louisiana).
-- From May 1 to May 8, nominations will not be accepted for meters 012515,
011860, 011054, 011071, 011402, 011834, 012024

***Project extended one day, until May 6.
Replace Middlesex Turnpike Road Crossing (near Lexington, MA).
-- From May 2 to May 6, nominations will not be accepted for meter 020192.

***NEW PROJECT
300 Line Pigging
-- One day during the week of May 8 through May 12, restrict and seal
through a pro rata portion of Secondary services (IT-X, IT, AOT, PAT,
Payback, EDS/ERS, Secondary) meters located on the 300 Line downstream of
MLV 314.

Lowering of Belle Chase Channel Crossing (near Port Sulphur, LA).
-- From May 22 to May 27, nominations will not be accepted for meters
010436, 020488.

***Project postponed until June 6 to June 9
Pipeline rehab between 256A-101 and 256A-103 (North Adams Lateral, MA).
-- From June 6 to June 9, nominations will be limited for meter 020103 and
will not be accepted for meter 020747.

Pipeline rehab between 260A-101 and 260A-105 (Northhampton Lateral, MA).
-- Between May 26 and June 17, nominations will not be accepted for a three
day period for meters 020104, 040943 and for a six day period for meters
020292, 020106.

800 Line road crossing work (near Clifton Springs, TN).
-- From June 1 to June 16, nominations and deliveries will be limited to
17,500 Dth for meter 020706.
-- Time to time, from June 1 to June 16, may restrict and seal through a pro
rata portion of Secondary services (IT-X, IT, AOT, PAT, Payback, EDS/ERS,
Tertiary, Secondary) meters (including the Zone L 800 pool meter) located
upstream of Station 834 (Winnsboro, LA).

Pipeline rehab between 864-1 and 865-1 (near White House, TN).
-- From June 5 to June 18, nominations will not be accepted for meter
020600.

Install pig launcher at MLV 329, receiver at MLV 336 and replace MLV 330.
-- Between June 16 and July 8, nominations will not be accepted for a three
day period for meters 020293, 020101, 010868, 020201, 020344, 020477.
-- Time to time, from June 16 to July 8, may restrict and seal through
Extended services (IT-X, IT, AOT, PAT, Payback, EDS/ERS) meters on the 300
Line located downstream of Station 319 (Wyalusing, NJ).

Pipeline rehab on the Donna Lateral (South Texas).
-- From July 1 to July 9, nominations will not be accepted for meters
011096, 012220, 012336, 012457, 012511, 011754, 012074, 010108, 010094,
012451, 011756, 012306, 010065, 010551.

Pipeline rehab between 563-2 and 564-2 (near Greenbrier, TN).
-- From July 5 to July 15, nominations will not be accepted for meter
020753.

400 Line road crossing work (near Edinburg, TX).
-- From August 1 to August 5, nominations will not be accepted for meter
012074, 010994, 011751, 010103.

Filter Separator Installation at Station 860
-- Time to time, from August 7 to August 12, may restrict and seal through a
pro rata portion of Secondary services (IT-X, IT, AOT, PAT, Payback,
EDS/ERS, Tertiary, Secondary) meters (including the Zone L 500 pool meter)
located upstream of Station 534 (Purvis, MS).

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative or
Volume Analyst.

Craig Harris
Manager, Operations Control

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************