pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

Steven Harris
12/11/2000 04:42 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  John R Keller                           12/08/2000 02:35 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

Steve/Lorraine:

As promised, attached below is the "Level B" estimate for expanding Gallup
10mmcf/d.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John R Keller/OTS/Enron on 12/08/2000
02:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben Asante                           12/08/2000 02:28 PM

To: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

John,
I am forwarding the Level B estimate for the Gallup modification. This
involves increasing the horsepower output (from 12,000  to 15,000 HP drive)at
the station
with a consequent flow increase of 10mmcfd.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
thanks
ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron on 12/08/2000 03:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 04:50 PM

To: Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

---------------------- Forwarded by Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron on 12/07/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 03:27 PM

To: JERRY MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate
cc: Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

THERE WERE CHANGES IN DOLLARS DUE TO THE TESTING COMPLETED LAST WEEK. THE
COMPRESSOR WHEEL
IS ADEQUATE FOR CONDITIONS BUT IF PRESSURE CHANGES   WHEEL OR CASE MAY
REQUIRE ATTENTION AT THAT TIME.
THE DRIVE NEEDS TO DEVELOP 13,000 H.P.  AND WITH A SERVICE FACTOR OF 1.2, A
15,OOO H.P. DRIVE IS RECOMMENDED.


Thanks,
Elena


Attached please find the Natural Gas market analysis for today.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 10-16-01 Nat Gas.doc


Notice No. 00-392
November 17, 2000

TO: ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS

FROM: Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

DATE:  November 17, 2000

RE:  Notice of CFTC Approval of Amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47 ("Audit
Committee")
____________________________________________________________________

Please be advised that the CFTC has approved amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47
("Audit Committee"), which are shown below and are now in effect.  The
amendments add an additional Public Director and expand the duties of the
Audit Committee to encompass consideration of the information to be included
in NYMEX filings to the SEC.

If you have any questions, please contact Michael Lugo, Vice President of
Internal Auditing, at  (212) 299-2268.

APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 6.40A

(An asterisk indicates deletions; parentheses indicate deletions.)

Rule 3.47 AUDIT COMMITTEE

(A) The Audit Committee shall be a regular committee and shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board and *two*(three) Public Directors appointed by the
Board.  One of the Public Directors shall serve as Chairman of the Committee
(B) The Audit Committee shall:
(i) *on* (On) an annual basis:
(a) make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding selection,
retention and discharge of independent auditors for the ensuing year; and
(b) *(b)* review the scope and general extent of the independent auditors,
examination, the significant audit procedures which will be utilized, and
fees charged for their services.
((ii) Review the audited financial statements and discuss them with
management and the independent auditors. These discussions shall include, but
not be limited to, the matters required to be disclosed under Statement of
Auditing Standards No. 61 (established by the Auditing Standards Board) and
consideration of the quality of the Exchange,s accounting principles as
applied in its financial reporting, including a review of sensitive
accounting estimates, reserves and accruals, judgement areas, audit
adjustments (whether or not recorded), and other such inquires as the
Committee or the independent auditors shall deem appropriate.  Based on such
review, the Committee shall make its recommendation to the Board as to the
inclusion of the Exchange,s audited financial statements in the Exchange,s
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(iii) Discuss with representatives of management and the independent auditors:
(a) the interim financial information contained in the Exchange,s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q prior to its filing; and
(b) the results of the review by the independent auditors.)
(iv) *(ii) on* (On) a monthly basis, or at such times as the Committee shall
determine, but not less than twice each year, meet with the independent
auditors, President, Senior Vice President of Finance, *Director* (Vice
President) of Internal Audit and other personnel as the Committee deems
appropriate to review:
(a) the scope of the audit plan;
(b) the Exchange,s financial statements;
(c) the results of external and internal audits;
(d) the effectiveness of the Exchange,s system of internal controls;
(e) any limitations imposed by Exchange personnel on the independent
auditors; and
(f) such other matters as the Committee shall deem appropriate upon advising
the Executive Committee.
((v)) * review *(Review) the internal audit function of the Exchange,
including proposed audit programs for the coming year, the coordination of
such a programs with the independent auditors, the extent to which
recommendations made by the internal auditors or by the independent auditors
have been implemented, and management,s response to the recommendations of
the independent *auditors;* (auditors.)
(vi) *(iv)review,* (Review,)  at its discretion, compliance with codes of
conduct established the * Exchange;*(Exchange.)
((vii)) * consult* (Consult) with the independent auditors, and when
appropriate the * Director*  (Vice President) of Internal Audit, out of the
presence of management.
 * establish * ((viii)Establish) direct communication between the auditors
and the * Board; * (Board)
((ix))* initiate* (Initiate,) at its discretion, investigations within the
parameters of foregoing responsibilities, and for that purpose with the
approval of the Board, retain outside legal counsel, independent auditors, or
any other such experts as if may deem   *appropriate; and* (appropriate.)
((x))  * report* (Report) to the entire Board at such time as the (Committee
determines,) but not less than twice a year on the activities described in
this Rule.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-392)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Winckowski, Michele
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:17 PM
> Subject:	FW: I AM THANKFUL FOR ......
>
>
>
> > > > I AM THANKFUL FOR ......
> > > >
> > > > THE PARTNER WHO HOGS THE COVERS EVERY NIGHT,
> > > > BECAUSE HE
> > > > IS NOT OUT WITH SOMEONE ELSE.
> > > >
> > > > THE CHILD WHO IS NOT CLEANING HIS ROOM, BUT IS
> > > > WATCHING TV,
> > > > BECAUSE THAT MEANS HE IS AT HOME AND NOT ON THE
> > > > STREETS.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE TAXES THAT I PAY, BECAUSE IT MEANS THAT I
> > > > AM EMPLOYED.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE MESS TO CLEAN AFTER A PARTY, BECAUSE IT
> > > > MEANS THAT
> > > > I HAVE BEEN SURROUNDED BY FRIENDS.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE CLOTHES THAT FIT A LITTLE TOO SNUG,
> > > > BECAUSE IT MEANS
> > > > I HAVE ENOUGH TO EAT.
> > > >
> > > > FOR MY SHADOW THAT WATCHES ME WORK, BECAUSE IT
> > > > MEANS I AM IN THE SUNSHINE.
> > > >
> > > > FOR A LAWN THAT NEEDS MOWING, WINDOWS THAT NEED
> > > > CLEANING, AND GUTTERS THAT NEED FIXING, BECAUSE IT MEANS I HAVE
> A
> HOME.
> > > >
> > > > FOR ALL THE COMPLAINTS I HEAR ABOUT THE
> > > > GOVERNMENT, BECAUSE IT MEANS THAT WE HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE PARKING SPOT I FIND AT THE FAR END OF THE
> > > > PARKING LOT, BECAUSE IT MEANS I AM CAPABLE OF WALKING AND THAT I
> HAVE
> > > > BEEN BLESSED WITH TRANSPORTATION.
> > > >
> > > > FOR MY HUGE HEATING BILL, BECAUSE IT MEANS I AM
> > > > WARM.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE LADY BEHIND ME IN CHURCH THAT SINGS OFF
> > > > KEY, BECAUSE IT MEANS THAT I CAN HEAR.
> > > >
> > > > FOR THE PILE OF LAUNDRY AND IRONING, BECAUSE IT
> > > > MEANS I HAVE CLOTHES TO WEAR.
> > > >
> > > > FOR WEARINESS AND ACHING MUSCLES AT THE END OF
> > > > THE DAY, BECAUSE IT MEANS I HAVE BEEN CAPABLE OF WORKING HARD.
> > > >
> > > > THE ALARM THAT GOES OF IN THE EARLY MORNING
> > > > HOURS, BECAUSE IT MEANS THAT I AM ALIVE.
> > > > AND FINALLY.......
> > > >
> > > > FOR TOO MUCH E-MAIL, BECAUSE IT MEANS I HAVE
> > > > FRIENDS WHO ARE THINKING OF ME.
> > > >
> > > > ** SEND THIS TO SOMEONE YOU CARE ABOUT, AND WHEN
> > > > YOU THINK YOUR LIFE IS SO BAD, READ THIS AGAIN **
> > > >
> > >


Shiela,

Just following up to my call to you, if you could please provide any
documentation to John in an envelope prior to the Monday meeting, I would
appreciate it.  Also, could you please add me to your distribution list?

Thank you for all your efforts.

Kim Hillis
x30681

	From:  Sheila Knudsen                           12/04/2000 12:03 PM

To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron,
Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Miguel Padron/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Christy
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lillian
Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tina Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eva Hernandez/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lisa Wolfe/NA/Enron@Enron, Shimira
Jackson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Luly Stephens/NA/Enron@Enron, Crissy Collett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: December 11 PRC Meeting

Please mark your calendars for the December 11, 2000 PRC meeting to prereview
Vice Presidents in the following organizations:

Enron North America
Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Global Markets
Enron Networks
Enron South America
APACHI
CALME

The meeting will be held at the St. Regis Hotel, 1919 Briar Oaks Lane,
Houston in the Plaza Room.  The meeting is scheduled from 8:00am to 5:00pm.
For those of you who are part of the Enron Wholesale Services Group, please
plan to be there at 8:00am, as the first part of the meeting will be devoted
to discussing PRC results of groups below Vice President, and Manager to
Director/Sr. Director promotion nominations.  The Vice President rating is
scheduled to begin at approximately 9:45am.

The telephone number of the hotel is 713-840-7600.

A complete agenda and details will be forthcoming later this week.

For those of you in the organization units listed above, please be prepared
to present and discuss your Vice Presidents.

Please feel free to contact me at X36628 in Houston, should you have any
questions.

Sheila Knudsen


Dear Team:

Attached is a copy of the presentation to be given on campus for your review.

Thank you!

Lexi
3-4585


You will have several opportunities in the next few days to see a taped
interview with Jeff Skilling on The Players segment of "Business Unusual," a
program that captures the insights of the world's prominent corporate
leaders.  "Business Unusual" will appear on CNN networks in select regions
around the globe.  Jeff will discuss why Enron is destined to be the world's
leading company, developing a culture that rewards change, the principles of
a "loose/tight" organization and more.

Broadcast Schedule:

CNN
Saturday, May 19
11:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time

Sunday, May 20
5:30 Central Standard Time (a.m. and p.m.)

CNNfn
Monday through Friday, May 21-25
7 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. Central Standard Time

CNN International
Europe:
Saturday, May 19,  1130 CET
Sunday, May 20,  1930 CET

Asia:
Saturday, May 19,  1030 HK

Latin America:
Saturday, May 19,  930 BA
Sunday, May 20,  1030 BA


For Pre Jan - It should be Market East.

Chris Germany
11/20/2000 11:12 AM
To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cove Point Contract

I can't remember, should the VNG demand charges be on I'm VNG or East and
Market East?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 11:11
AM ---------------------------

Scott Goodell@ENRON
11/15/2000 09:00 AM
To: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cove Point Contract

Carol Herman said the mdq is 10,000 and the rate is $4.9473.
Chris please look at the deal in sitara, I copied the October deal that had a
reservation volume of 360,000.
Scott

Scott Goodell
11/14/2000 11:59 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cove Point Contract

I entered the VNG Cove Point contract FPS1001 in sitara.
The deals are as follows:
484681  IM VNG
484687 Im Market East
484689 Im East
I have a call into Transco's Carol Herman to get the correct rate.


Please be advised the following new points have been established for Transwestern

POI Name                  Agave Loco/Eddy County 12 in Loop
POI Number                78311
Meter #                   10188
DRN				   316185
Location                  Sec 2, T17S, R29E, Eddy County NM
Type                      PDC
Operator                  Transwestern Pipeline

POI Name                  Agave Dodd
POI Number                78308
Meter #                   10189
DRN			                315750
Location                  Sec 15, T17S, R29E
Type                      PDC
Operator                  Transwestern Pipeline

Elizabeth -please look over the lateral ID, marketing lateral ID, the supply basin, etc. and GRI flag and let me know if any changes need to be made. Thanks

Karen


I am working on getting Nate's email.
I will try to get him to show up at indoor on Monday.
B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jon+2EGail+40hcs+2Estate+2Eor+2Eus+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	RE: Fall Green Room Soccer

Let's get Nate on the team he would be great addition! Let him know about
getting on the team and if he has an e-mail address I will add him to the
team list. Have a good one.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams III, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams.III@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:48 PM
To: PWS-Fab1 <PWS-Fab1@Siltronic.com>@ENRON; Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us;
aevanloon@hotmail.com; bvargo@koin.com; greenroom@attglobal.net;
jacobf@hapdx.org; kwitcosky@portlanddev.org; kevin_mcdowe11@yahoo.com;
kmurray@responsys.com; neill@pcez.com; Tristan.Brunin@yoshida.com;
kerr68@earthlink.net; zottermj@hotmail.com; MRBndaHAUS@aol.com;
JWilliamson@BAUGHPDX.COM; bente@hevanet.com; daleb@usnr.com;
CPTHoff@NMHG.com; rhalstead@pdx.edu; jon.bloomfield@verizon.net
Cc: mossyuk@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Fall Green Room Soccer

Green Room,

Granted, I missed the last game and though I may not deserve to present
an opinion given my lengthy stay on the reserve list, I also favor the
move to D1.  I think better competition will be more fun, provided that
we field a full team (speaking mostly at myself here) on a consistent
basis.  I have started playing again and am hoping to be back for the
Fall season, I also know another player-Nate Stanton (he has played with
a few of us in indoor)-who is interested in playing and is a bit quicker
and better than myself.  So for what it's worth.  D1 all the way.

Thanks.

B

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	PWS-Fab1 <PWS-Fab1@Siltronic.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-PWS-Fab1+20+3CPWS-Fab1+40Siltronic+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON
> @ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 2:22 PM
> To:	\"Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us\" ; \"aevanloon@hotmail.com\" ;
> Williams III, Bill; \"bvargo@koin.com\" ; \"greenroom@attglobal.net\"
> ; \"jacobf@hapdx.org\" ; \"kwitcosky@portlanddev.org\" ;
> \"kevin_mcdowe11@yahoo.com\" ; \"kmurray@responsys.com\" ;
> \"neill@pcez.com\" ; \"Tristan.Brunin@yoshida.com\" ;
> \"kerr68@earthlink.net\" ; \"zottermj@hotmail.com\" ;
> \"MRBndaHAUS@aol.com\" ; \"JWilliamson@BAUGHPDX.COM\" ;
> \"bente@hevanet.com\" ; \"daleb@usnr.com\" ; \"CPTHoff@NMHG.com\" ;
> \"rhalstead@pdx.edu\" ; \"jon.bloomfield@verizon.net\"
> Cc:	\"mossyuk@hotmail.com\"
> Subject:	Re:Fall Green Room Soccer
>
> Hello all,
>
> Considering the circumstances if we don't move up, I think we should
> just
> move
> up to the first division. As a lover of european soccer, I enjoy the
> promotion/relegation system. It is a great way for leagues to equalize
> competition. So we should just take it in the gut and toughin' up and
> move
> to
> the 1st. It'll be fun and competitive. Maybe it'll give us more
> motivation
> to
> stay focused as a team. I'm all for it. Afterall, we deserve it. We
> earned
> this
> move. I don't want to switch and loose the Green Room name just to
> stay in
> 2nd
> Div.
>
> But this does mean that it wouldn't hurt to have a few more good
> players
> join
> us. So if you know of anyone really good, have him join.
>
> Jon--The check's in the mail.
>
> To the first!
>
> Jay
>
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject:    Fall Green Room Soccer
> Author: "Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us" <SMTP:Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us>
> Date:       7/13/01 2:00 PM
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just a quick reminder that I do need to get a $50 from all of you who
> want
> to play on the Green Room's Fall '01 Soccer Team.     The money ($670
> 2nd
> Division or $760 for 1st Division) is due to the league by July 23rd
> so I
> need  you to send me a check ASAP.  My address is 8573 SW Dakota Drive
> Tualatin, OR 97062. The 10 games will be on Sundays from 12 -2 mostly
> some
> 2-4 games starting on September 9th.
>
> The other issue I need you to ponder is 1st Division vs 2nd Division.
> I
> know at our last game we decided to stay in 2nd but what I did not
> know at
> the time is it will cause The Green Room to be ineligible for a league
> championship (for 2 years) if we are 1st or 2nd in our league since we
> did
> not promote our team to 1st division.  I guess one way around this is
> to
> change our name and Manager (nay volunteers?) and then I doubt the
> league
> would know who we are even though we are basically the old Green Room
> team
> or just to try out 1st division and see how it goes and try and get a
> few
> more power players to make us even better.   Please respond to me by
> telling
> me if you think we should stay in 2nd or move up to 1st.  Also send me
> money!  Thanks.
>
> Jon  Gail
> 8573 SW Dakota Drive
> Tualatin OR 97062
>
> 503-691-8067.


Lunch is not good this week.  I have a business lunch tomorrow.  Thursday is the GISB Board meeting.  Are you going?  I"ll give you a ride there and to your car afterwards if you do not need to come back downtown to work.  Let me know.

Dad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Queen28cmh@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Queen28cmh+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	shorton@enron.com
Subject:	morning 6/5

Good morning.  How are you today?  Mom told me you called last night and would be at EOTT all day, but I know you can get your email there.  :)  So how does the rest of the week look for lunch?  Are you free Wed. or Thurs.?  Let me know.  Next week I'll be gone to Regionals!!  I can't believe it has come up so fast.  I can't wait, but I also remember just how unpredictable Regionals can be so I don't want to get my hopes up about anything.  Of course, my two kids are being little angels which is making me feel pretty good about my chances so we'll see what happens.  Well, I better go do some actual work (although no one is even here yet so I'm not sure what exactly I'm supposed to do this morning), but oh well.  I'll talk to you later.  Have a good day.  I love you!!!
Love,
Caron
PS - Hopefully I will get my paycheck today!!!!!!  :)


Actually, Bob was handling and he knows you will handle.  I believe that this
master was based upon the Cargill, Incorporated master.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	01/08/2001 05:49 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cargill Alliant

We discussed the possibility of my working on this -- we planned that you
would talk to Mary about it first.  Let me know the outcome.

I am already working on Cargill, Inc.   I am in the process of talking to
Mara Alexander.


Ecogas and its affiliates have claims and lawsuits outstanding against them
totaling over $8.5 million. These cases are, for the most part , suits to
collect on unpaid debts, for which there are very limited defenses. The
likelihood of success on the defenses of these cases is small.


just got your email address from rachel.  congrats on your promotion.  i'm
sure it's going to be alot different for you but it sounds like a great
deal.  my hubby and i moved out to katy a few months ago.  i love it there -
my parents live about 10 minutes away.  new news from me - i'm having a baby
- due in june.  i can't even believe it myself.  the thought of me being a
mother is downright scary but i figure since i'm almost 30, i probably need
to start growing up.  i'm really excited though.  rachel is coming to visit
me in a couple of weeks.  you planning on coming in for any of the rodeo
stuff?  you'll never guess who i got in touch with about a month ago.  it was
the weirdest thing - heather evans.  i hadn't talked to her in about 10
years.  seems like she's doing well but i can never really tell with her.
anyway, i'll let you go.  gotta get back to work.  looking forward to hearing
back from ya.


FYG
---------------------- Forwarded by Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES on 08/07/2001 06:32 PM ---------------------------
From:	Bill Williams III/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/07/2001 05:50 PM
To:	Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Ancillary Services

Neil,
The revenue for the sale that Phil entered to the CAISO will be captured by our volume management group.  RT will have no access to this revenue.  Consequently, we will not buy or sell it on your behalf to capture it.
Please give me a call tomorrow for a more thorough explanation.
Thanks,
Bill


Please follow up asap.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/22/2001 02:27 PM -----

	William Krenz@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/20/2001 11:31 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders@ECT
		 cc: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher B
Hunt/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Privilege Matters

Richard:  Following up on my voicemail message to you.  As I mentioned, we
were referred to you by Mark Haedicke in connection with some inquires I have
regarding the application of the attorney-client or work-product privileges
to internal operational audits.  In particular, I am interested in Enron's
standard practice in that regard and any standard or sample documentation
used to cover the audit reports by one or both of the privileges.  Im also
curious as to whether the same approach has been used with respect financial
audits regarding internal controls.  Pls let me know.

Regards,

Bill Krenz
X67749


As a result of the creation of the Global Markets business in the last few
days, I would add the following persons to the attendee list for the ASE in
Dallas:

 Brent Price  VP Operations and CAO, Global Markets
 Tom Myers  Director of Accounting, Global Markets

Brent is in London this week, and will be on vacation the week of August 21.
With the demands of a new role, Brent will be best able to address the
feasibility of one or both of them attending.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/29/99 10:40
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Robin Connor <robin_connor@khh.com>                           07/29/99
10:14 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: swap opinion letter/ enron and RPII.DOC

 <<swap opinion letter/ enron and RPII.DOC>>

Attached for your review is a form of opinion letter to be delivered in
connection with the confirmation.  Please call me (817-878-3575) after you
have had a chance to review the letter.

 - swap opinion letter/ enron and RPII.DOC


Frances Burmeister
1120 East Madison
Fairfield, IA 52556
fburmeister@aimmidwest.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Frances Burmeister


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their
Manager. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000014508&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000014508
Request Create Date : 1/19/01 10:15:44 AM
Requested For       : bilal.bajwa@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Stack Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Cathy,

I can take 4 tickets.

Thanks.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phillips, Cathy
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Frevert, Mark; McConnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Arnell, Doug; Aronowitz, Alan; Aury, Pierre; Beck, Sally; Bergsieker, Rick; Douglas, Stephen H.; Fraser, Jennifer; Funkhouser, Shanna; Gonzales, Eric; Hickerson, Gary; Kaminski, Vince J; Lawyer, Larry; Mahoney, Chris; Mcclellan, George; Myers, Thomas; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Perlman, Beth; Price, Brent A.; Reck, Daniel; Skinner, Cindy; Staley, Stuart; Tawney, Mark; Tholan, Scott; Yoho, Lisa; Davies, Neil; Sekse, Per; Douglas, Stephen H.; Vonderheide, Scott; Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron; Patrick, Michael K.; Brown, Bill W.
Cc:	Daw, Nicki; Phillips, Cathy; Burns, Jennifer; Lipscomb, DeMonica; Francois, Yvonne; Collins, Angie; Baker, Donna; Taylor, Helen Marie; Villanueva, Chantelle; Coneway, Betty J.; Thompson, Patti; Westbrook, Cherylene R.; Parker, Candace; Purswell, Sharon; Solis, Gloria; Johnston, Brenda J.; McCarthy, Susan; Forsyth, Paula; Crenshaw, Shirley; Hardeman, Kathleen D.; Cichosz, Stuart; Zoch, Judy; Katyal, Sunita; Lydia Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT; Armstrong, Kristy; Garcia, Nita; Brandli, Christina; Martinez, Yolanda; Beffer, Michele; Jackson, Shimira; Castillo, Rosie
Subject:	Tickets & EGM Staff Meeting - Reminder

Just a reminder that the EGM weekly staff meeting will take place on Monday, May 21st, from 8:30 - 9:30 a.m., in video conference room EB 32C2.

Please note that due to the Memorial Day holiday on Monday, May 28th, the staff meeting for that week will be held on Tuesday, May 29th, from 8:30 -9:30 a.m. in video conference room EB 32C2.

The Astros tickets for the day game on May 23rd, have not been claimed.  Please let me know as soon as possible if anyone in your group might be interested in the tickets.  The tickets are for 4 dugout seats on the visitors side and the game begins at 3:05 p.m.  The tickets will go to the first response I receive via e-mail.

Please let me know if you are unable to attend the staff meeting on Monday.  Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
X-36898


Alan - I know Jeff is out of town and may not see this right away so I
thought I would forward it on to you.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 06:46 PM -----

	Melba Lozano
	05/30/2000 04:48 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Pulp Physical Fwd

Jeff,
Andrew Conner wants to trade Pulp Physical Forward on Enron Online.  We
currently have Pulp Financial Swaps.  Could you please provide me with the
Online GTC that we will be using for this product.  If you have any questions
please call me at ext.58986.

Thank you,

Melba


Here is the list of credit dept. employees you asked for.

K
---------------------- Forwarded by Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------

From:  Dorothy Youngblood
        04/13/2000 01:45 PM

To: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Updated list of credit dept. employees

I am so sorry, had you at the top of my list with other priorities.  Here
they are:

Credit Risk Management Employees  - Houston Employees

Bill Bradford
Debbie Brackett
Lesli Campbell
Russell Diamond
Veronica Espinoza
Nichole Gunter
Molly Harris
Nidia Mendoza
Tom Moran
Martin O'Leary
Rod Nelson
Trago Ngo
Paul Radous
Brant Reves
Tanya Rohauer
Edward Sacks
Brad Schneider
Christopher Smith
John Suttle
Tara Turk
Cathy Tudon
Dorothy Youngblood - Sr. Admin. Assistant

Credit Risk Management - London Employees

David Hardy
Olga Kozyreva
Neil Anderson
Oliver Harrison
Diana Higgins
Tim Davies
Soma Ghosh
Lee Munden
Karolina Asklund
Esther Gerratt

Kaye Ellis
04/13/2000 11:50 AM
To: Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Updated list of credit dept. employees

I'm not trying to rush you because I know you are busy.  I just wanted to
remind you to email me the list of credit dept. employees so I can get my
email out about a lunch meeting for later in the month.

Thanks for your help.

Kaye


Thanks for the message.  I will try to get that fixed.  Mark


**The scheduled work on SI Server on 8/28/01 has been re-scheduled to
8/29/01**

				** URGENT NOTIFICATION:  SI Server will be
UNAVAILABLE, Wednesday, August 29, 2001 (14:20 to 14:55pdt) to Perform a
Fallback to our backup SI server in Alhambra.

		Please submit all Hour Ahead schedules for August 29th  HE ,
1800 and 1900 and Supplemental Energy schedules for, 1700 and 1800 prior to
1400.

				Once the fallback is complete and the SI
system is available, Please clear your memory and disk caches (Edit,
Preferences, Advanced, Cache) & close all Netscape windows (including
messages).  Restart Netscape and point your browsers to our Backup server by
utilizing the following URL: https://alhibk1b/iso <https://alhibk1b/iso> .

Please contact Benik DerGevorgian (916) 351-2277 bdgevorgian@caiso.com
<mailto:bdgevorgian@caiso.com>  or Michael Glatz (916) 608-5727
Client Relations Communication
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


Oxley and I will come up with a first stab at the option grants.

John


Here are a few additional points:

I spoke with Ken Saathoff at ERCOT last week (he is the director of technical operations) and he agreed that an OOMC instruction is essentially a "be ready" instruction and an additional OOME or another type of unit specific instruction is necessary for the plant to deploy. He is John Adams boss, so there is a disconnect between the two levels.  In addition to Kent, I spoke to Mark Walker the senior corporate counsel regarding payment, or lack thereof and he suggested that the only method would be to dispute the settlement statement and use that process.  Going forward however, that is not an effective mechanism due to the delay in payment and the necessity to prove your cost structure.

In speaking with Forney a few minutes ago it sounds like he may have convinced John Adams, but I would be happy to call Kent Saathoff if you feel that would help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Portz, David
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Baughman, Edward D.; Miller, Jeffrey; Forney, John M.
Subject:	Ercot Questions OOMC & OOME

Forwarded as discussed.  Doug Gilbert Smith has asked that your group draft a complaint to the PUCT regarding this misinterpretation of the Protocols by the ERCOT ISO, which effectively requires a generator called on for the OOMC ancillary service to run its plant, and sidesteps the obligation to pay an OOME price component when the plant's output is utilized by ERCOT.  The OOMC compensation is currently negligible (and recovery of actual costs under Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.1(6) may take a long time), and the OOME compensation has various problems as well: (1) the more ERCOT calls on a plant for OOME, the the lesser the OOME price paid (Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.2 -- Heat Rate value decreases), and (2) plants directed to provide, say, 135MWs of OOMC/OOME, are not allowed to generate above 135 MWs in an interval (thus running the plant economically at a lower heat rate) to sell the excess in the marketplace. The Frontera plant, a customer of EPMI acting as QSE, is located such that ERCOT is and will be consistently telling the plant via its QSE to provide OOMC -- to produce energy going north on a line in South Texas. Doug says we should advocate to the PUC that plants in such a position should be Reliability Must Run ("RMR") and be paid at an adequate premium for their support of the system' reliability.

I noted to you as well that this is likely to be a dispute with ERCOT over the interpretation of the Protocols, conducted under Protocols Section 20, and we would appreciate any reg. group efforts toward preparation for iinitiating such dispute.  Frontera has indicated they will not provide OOMC tomorrow even if ERCOT tells us, their QSE that it should be dispatched. Thus we are caught in the middle.  The legitimate bases for not complying with an ERCOT dispatch instruction are stated in Protocols Section 5.4.4(2): "threat to safety, risk of bodily harm or damage to the equipment, or otherwise is not in compliance with these Protocols".  Though the Protocols Sections 1-22 seem to recognize as to other capacity- oriented ancillary service products that it is 'generating capacity available but not energy delivered to the grid', I have not seen this made clear as to OOMC.  The Operating Guides' definition of OOMC, page 21 seems to recognize this however, and Section 2B of the ERCOT Market Guide, p. 8 (Feb 22, 2001) recognizes the distinction between capacity and generated energy clearly in support of the position stated by John Forney below.

Sorry for the long e-mail -- I was trying to provide a statting point for your group.
  -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	Ercot Questions

David,
I need some help with an Ercot protocol interpretation:

Frontera has been issued  OOMC requests by the ISO on numerous occasions, starting September 14th.    This Out of Merit request is issued if no mkt bids exist to solve congestion, whether local or zonal.
The OOMC, as I understand it,  reserves capacity for Ercot and the premium is predetermined based on a formula mentioned in the protocols.   The formula is based on the replacement reserve clearing price,  which currently is zero.   This is because the replacement reserve market is non-existent.  An announcement on how the OOMC capacity payments will be calculated is due out this week,  per Mark Patterson.

The second component of this option is OOME.    This is a request for actual energy related to the OOMC option.   The strike price is calculated from a preset heat rate multiplied by the HSC daily price, as mentioned in the protocols.  So the OOMC/OOME ws designed to work like the ancillary services with a capacity award and an energy component.  I think that this is the spirit of the OOM's, as mentioned in Section 6 of the Protocols.

Here is the problem:
the head of Ercot Market Operations,  John Adams,  interprets the protocols to mean that OOMC requries the plant to be generating.     When Ercot dispatchers had issued an OOMC,  they quickly followed up to ask us why we were not generating into the grid.
We explained to them, on numerous occasions,  that we dont believe OOMC means run.   If they wanted us to run,  then they would need to issue an OOME for the actual energy component.    I asked my employees to clarify with Ercot whether we were being asked to run,  yes or no.    When instructed to run by Ercot,  we had to assume that we were settled based upon the OOME calc, as we were previously under OOMC orders.

I sent at least three e-mails to my Ercot rep,  Mark Patterson regarding this issue.   I finally caught him by phone and he relayed that he thought Ercot's  intrepretation was correct.    For all of the times that we ran,  at their request,  we werent going to be paid based on the OOME heat rate calc,  rather we were going to receive the balancing energy price ( a penalty for Resource Imbalance).   For example,  in the early morning hours we would receive as little as $1 for electricity that cost $27 to generate.   Mark also mentioned that when they said run,  they expected us to sell to someone else,  or just generate into the imbalance.    Mark told me "dont worry,  you can file to receive your generation expenses in the event that you lost money."

Here is my view:
OOMC does not mean run.  It means have the capacity available in the event Ercot calls,  much like replacement,  responsive reserve and non-spinning.
Ercot's interpretation is being decided by the Manager of Mkt Operations,  a group supposedly unconcerned with price.
If OOMC means to run,  then why would the protocols contemplate, or need OOME?  They would never have to pay OOME if we were already running into the imbalance.
OOMC is an option and the exercise is OOME.   This is basically the disagreement.    This could very well be a $500,000 issue for Frontera.
Why would anyone generate for $27 and dump to the imbalance mkt at $5 in hopes of filing for a "breakeven."   Ridiculous.

I spoke with Bill Kettlewell with Customer Relations and he had "no comment" on whether OOMC means to generate.  Mark Patterson now also has "no comment."
Bill and Mark said that we needed to file a dispute in order to receive closure on the OOM capacity payment.   I suspect that we will follow this same path when we file for OOME reimbursement vs.  the imbalance price we will receive.

I had instructed my employeess to refuse to turn on the plant   (in response to an OOMC) until we receive an OOME instruction.   This has compelled  Ercot to deploy an OOME request to us, because they need  to have us online to control local congestion.   Would this not be an omission that their view was incorrect?  Section 5.4.4 says that a QSE may fail to comply with an Ercot directive if it causes a safety concern, or ,  Ercot is not in compliance with the Protocols.  The latter is in effect.
Ercot is now telling us that they cannot instruct us, or give us an OOME deployment,  unless we are already runnnig.    I think that this is a software issue, not a protocol issue.
We worked out an interim compromise with Ercot until this issue can be settled.  Once we have been OOMC'd,  we will start to gen.   Once we reach full load,  we will request an OOME.   If they dont comply,  we will shut down the unit.    Ercot said that " it was entirely reasonable that we would  request to be compensated in the form of an OOME."
The Ercot dispatchers are complaining that OOME requires them to send an instruction every 15 minutes.   Is this why we are not getting the OOME instruction on a regular basis?

Finally,  I stressed to Ercot that I wasnt trying to manipulate prices, via OOME or force Ercot into a corner.    It just is not the right economic environment to generate for $27 and sell for $5.    Further,  operations personell at Ercot have frelayed their displeasure with me for "forcing them to OOME our plant."

Can I get an opinion on whether OOMC means to run?   If you agree with me,  what is our next step?  I need to move aggressively on this issue.

Thanks,

JForney
37160


Hi Angela

Sorry I did not get back in touch w you earlier - my mom passed away over the
holidays and I have been out of the office and don't know exactly when I will
be back (definitely out the week of 15th).   I look forward to playing and
will call you when I get back to play.


Here's the attachment

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin; Harris, Steven; Fawcett, Jeffery; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Donoho, Lindy; Lohman, TK
Cc:	Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Pavlou, Maria
Subject:	final contract for Red Rock

Here is the final version.  Please delete all other versions I've sent previously.  Thanks.


The following meeting has been arranged.  Please note your calenders and plan
to attend.

  Date:  August 15,  2000

  Time:  1:00 pm - 4:00 pm

  Location: 3321

  Topic:  Industrial QBR

Thanks

Kay 3-0643


Per my conversation a minute ago with the Koch lawyer in Kansas, Tye Darland,
"Koch Hydrocarbons, Inc." is a bad name.  The correct legal name for this
counterparty should be the same as it is set up in our Master Swap Agreement
database:  "Koch Industries, Inc., acting through its Koch Hydrocarbon
Company Division".  I have called the Koch trader, James "Doug" Peters
(713/544-5938, ext. 5602) , and asked him to resubmit the Password
Application with the name corrected.  Please show this correction in your
records as well.


Attached for your information is a memo that we plan to send out to employees worldwide Monday afternoon or Tuesday morning discussing the Policy Committee's cost saving recommendations.  To the extent there are unique aspects of these policies as they apply to your business unit, please follow up with a further communication to your employees.  We will send you a list of frequently asked questions that deal with systems issues.

Thank you.

Karen


Mark, I heard earlier today that the resolution of this matter has been to
move confirmation/documentation to Calgary, but leave contract preparation
and negotiation in Houston.

I must admit disappoint with this bifurcated result, including for the
following reasons:

1.  It has left, rightly or (I trust) wrongly, the impression that there is
concern as to the ability of the Canadian lawyers to documment and negotiate
the ISDAs, etc.  If this is the case, I do not share the concern.  The legal
group in Canada is strong, deep, conscientious, and regularly excels at
greater and more complex challenges which expose Enron Canada to greater
risks in physical trading, origination, finance and structured transactions.

2.  For these reasons, the Canadian lawyers have the trust and confidence of
the Canadian traders and originators, and their advice is sought and followed
on all matters, including, frankly, financial trading.

3.  This result ignores the practical realities of time, space, efficiency,
legal jurisdictions, marketplace knowledge and internal and external
relationships.

4.  I feel that the we ought to have the opportunity to be exposed to, and be
challenged by, all aspects of our business.

In any event, please let me know who will be responsible for legal oversight
of confirmation/documentation of financial transactions.  For physical
trading, we regularly advise on confirmation/documentation issues and, most
notably, all structured trades and trades with a term of greater than one
year are prepared and reviewed by Enron Canada legal.

Regards, Peter.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 01:21 PM -----

	Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	06/22/2000 11:26 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Mark

I have a commodity futures account that I use to hedge my physical cattle
positions.  If you need more information please let me know.

Ken

	Mark Taylor@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	06/21/00 06:39 PM

		 To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


I have Steve and Lisa on the internet at this web address

http://www.cartogra.com/home/home.asp

Enter the account name "trogg522" in the box on the bottom right.


Dear Vince,

I am so grateful for your efforts.  I really appreciate you taking time from your busy schedule.  If you have not contacted Michael Maddox, it's even better.  I have updated and re-worded my resume to better reflect my accomplishments.  Would you please contact Michael Maddox of CERA and forward my resume to him?  His contact information is (617) 497 6446 or email: mmaddox@cera.com

Have you had a chance to talk to David Port?  Maybe there are other options.  I am flexible and willing to do whatever it takes.

Sincerely,

Bessik Matchavariani
Manager
Enron Broadband Services
Tel: 713.345.7230
Fax: 713.646.8861
bessik_matchavariani@enron.net


Folks,

There will be a final Q&A teleconference call between the ISO and market
participants regarding the establishment of a Super Peak Energy
product/matching-service. The teleconference will be on Wednesday,
August 30, at 2 p.m. Pacific time.

The call in number is: 312-470-0030
The passcode is: 58305

Whereas I don't have an agenda for the meeting, I will begin by asking
those of you calling in to pose your question, and everyone will get at
least one shot at it.  Representatives from both the ISO, APX, and the
California PX will be on the call, too.

gba


Debra,
 I am not authorized to open these.  Sorry!!!

	Debra Perlingiere
	05/14/2001 10:56 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: 96032029_Base_Contract_12_30_99.pdffunc=doc.Fetch&nodeid=7560144

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

http://edms.livelink.enron.com/ena/livelink.exe/7560144/96032029_Base_Contract
_12_30_99.pdf?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=7560144


Stinson,

Any comments?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
04:38 PM ---------------------------

	Tracy L Arthur

	03/19/2001 03:29:37 PM

To: David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnCounter Article - Shalesh Ganjoo

We have conducted an interview and written the attached article for the
upcoming edition of the EnCounter, the Associate & Analyst Programs'
newsletter.  The interview was conducted with Shalesh Ganjoo in regards to
his participation with the implementation of storage capacity as a
commodity.

To ensure our publication is printing the most accurate information, I have
attached the article for your review.  Please confirm that the information
provided from Shalesh Ganjoo is accurate.

Thank you in advance for your assistance,
Tracy Arthur
Communication Specialist
Associate & Analyst Department
713-345-7853


ISO Market Participants:
  Earlier today, I sent a message announcing a conference call
next Tuesday to discuss implementation issues surrounding the ISO's proposed
Market Stabilization Plan.  In that message, I implied that the ISO would be
filing the Market Stabilization Plan with FERC this week. The filing we plan
to submit to FERC this week is only the ISO's comments on the FERC staff's
own Market Power Monitoring and Mitigation Proposal. We do not plan to file
the Market Stabilization Plan until after the March 30 Board meeting.
  I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
  Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
  Director, Client Relations
  (916) 608-7066


Fine with me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	FW: Texas EOL transactions

it would be easier if you waited till the 18th and changed everything of nothing.

Barbara has said legal would give us the green light on Friday the 18 th the proceed with making
changes to all the systems that need to occur for bid week.

Please let me know what you think,

thanks

bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denny, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Hall, Bob M
Subject:	FW: Texas EOL transactions

Bob,
Just wanted to pass the information I am getting below on to you. Didn't you think we would not know until the 18th?
See below, Tom Martin is wanting products changed on the 16th. Do you have any news I don't have yet.
Thanks for your help.
Jennifer
3-5824

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cass, Robert B.
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 3:24 PM
To:	Lozano, Melba; Meredith, Kevin; Walker, Chris
Cc:	Denny, Jennifer
Subject:	FW: Texas EOL transactions

Please note "HLP" change below.  Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Friday, May  11, 2001 1:20 PM
To:	Cass, Robert B.
Subject:	Texas EOL transactions

Barbara Gray has informed me that you have been inquiring about modifying the Texas EOL physical products to ENA as the counterparty for June.  The products you have to be concerned about are Waha and Exxon Katy Tailgate.  The other physical products are HPL related and will no longer be used.  There is a slight possibility that the Agua Dulce product may continue but I will contact you if it needs to be changed to ENA.  Our need for these ENA products will be approximately May 16th, when we want to roll out our June products.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Tom

x 33079


Please forward.  I don't have a note from Lesley.

Martha


Start Date: 1/8/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010824.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 376.39 / Final: 376.36)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/8/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Sorry, I forgot to answer your last question.  I think its fine to send the
documents out to Hanover.  Even if some of the blanks are not filled in, we
can get their lawyers looking at the structure.  DF

	From:  Michel Nelson                           02/11/2000 11:31 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Hanover / TW Compression Monetization

Drew - Do I need some kind of confidentiality agreement? An attorney present
to discuss at first meeting?

MKM - One questions Jim Gill had was how do we get around FERC requirements -
someone from Regulatory available to discuss at first meeting or.....?

Although we believe the operating agreement and other details are in order, I
hadn't just planned to send them as is to Hanover. Some counseling may be in
order here, as I'm moving into new territory for me......

---------------------- Forwarded by Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron on 02/11/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Michel Nelson                           02/11/2000 11:11 AM

To: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Hanover / TW Compression Monetization

Charlie -

Talked to Jim Gill with Hanover

jgill@hanover-co.com

Hanover Co
12001 N Houston Rosslyn
Houston
TX
77086

phone 281 405 5174

Per your previous conversation:
1. send equipment list - engine /comp models plus aux equipment

2. face to face meeting - Houston Feb 23 or 24 ( monetization team? )

* discuss equipment - operations (swing or continuous)
* jurisdictional / FERC issues

3. 3+- day station tour with Hanover VP of Ops

*site review
* very basic due diligence

4. re-group to:

*discuss issues
*financials
*agreement

Comments / questions......

Mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron on 02/11/2000
10:58 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Charlie Graham                           02/10/2000 04:43 PM

To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Hanover!

Mike,

Talked to Jim Gill at 4:30 pm.  They are very interested.  He proposed the
following steps:

1)  Send him an equipment list.  I think the Description and Location
Schedule 1.1 from the P&S Agreement would more than suffice.

2)  He would like to visit the stations with the Hanover V.P. of Operations
and one other person.  (He indicated 3 total.)  A quasi due diligence look at
the condition of the facilities.  He would like access to records etc. during
his visit.

3)  We could set down and talk "financials" after that.

He did not seemed surprised that I did not have good station plot plans to
supplement the equipment list.  I will get a package together tomorrow.
[Forgot to get his address. dah!]

I conjectured that you would want to discuss this with him further tomorrow.
He said he would be in all day.

Charlie


Dear Heather,

  Please be advised that I have entered a $38,865.43 sale annuity to credit the ST-NW book for BPA April 2001 transmission.
  This EnPower change should get pulled thru this month by Settlements.  I'm not sure if Elsie paid the invoice already and the difference has come thru in Houston's flash.  This may or may not show up as a DPR impact.  I'm thinking that since this is older than 6 weeks, it will be an accounting variance and that the NW book has already recognized the credit....
  Please let me know if you have any questions.
  Deal # 678029.1.

  Thanks,

  Virginia


Dave:

Based on our discussions this morning:

1.  Internal Costs -- a capacity charge will be determined for each wholesale
business unit based on a time allocation matrix that each lawyer and
paralegal prepares.  The time allocation matrix will be revised  during the
year if material changes in the work occur.

2.  Outside Costs -- require internal sign-off by GC and COO to spend more
than $10,000 on a potential transaction AND a written transaction budget for
proposed outside legal expenses more than $10,000.  Wherever possible, a firm
cap on legal fees should be negotiated.  A memorandum will be sent from the
GC and [Chairman of the Wholesale Group?] laying out the procedure to all
employees.

3.  Selection of Outside Lawyers -- expressly add billing rates and
efficiency as key considerations, in addition to quality, in the selection of
outside counsel.  [Dave, we need to complete our discussion on this point.]
Our new policy needs to be reviewed with outside counsel.

4.  Reopener!  -- need to review where business changes significantly.

	David W Delainey
	10/19/2000 12:33 PM

		 To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ENA Group Expenses

Guys, notes from the morning meeting.  Please review and comment.

Specific action items:
 a) i)further calculation of ENA/Non- ENA capacity charges, ii) estimation of
outside legal and iii) formulation of charge out/feedback process to the
business units;
 b) need budget/review for competitive analysis, technical and restructuring.

Regards
Delainey


Dear Vince,

Thanks for the interview with Enron.  I appreciated your time and the
conversation that we had together.  I really enjoyed my time at Enron and
believe that it is the type of company that I would like to work for.  More
specifically I enjoyed meeting the people in the research group and feel
that I could make a contribution and fit in well.  I look forward to
hearing from you or an Enron representative.

Sincerely,
Lance


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                     Wednesday, October 18, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159574
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Scottrade
 Fools, Scottrade is the only broker with $7 trades, 120
 local offices & FREE REALTIME STREAMING quotes & charts!
 Apply now!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159575

"We don't know a millionth of one percent about anything."
-- Thomas Edison

COPPER MOUNTAIN GETS HALVED
Copper Mountain, the provider of digital subscriber line
solutions, reported its Q3 earnings yesterday, along with some
bad news about its Q4.

By LouAnn Lofton

Digital subscriber line (DSL) solutions provider Copper Mountain
Networks (Nasdaq: CMTN) announced its third-quarter results
yesterday after the bell. The company also provided some
guidance for its fourth quarter and for its next fiscal year
that sent its stock tumbling more than 50% to around $12 in
after-hours trading. Copper Mountain closed in regular trading
yesterday at $26.88, far below the 52-week high it reached back
in July of $125.72.

For its third quarter, Copper Mountain had revenues of $93.5
million, 192% ahead of the $32 million it earned in the same
quarter a year ago. Pro forma net income, which excludes two
charges, was $15.8 million. The company's net income last year
in the third quarter was $5.3 million.

Copper Mountain's pro forma earnings per diluted share came in a
penny ahead of the consensus estimate at $0.27. Third-quarter
earnings per share a year ago were $0.09.

Now, for the stuff that sent the company's stock plummeting in
after-hours trading. Rick Gilbert, Copper Mountain's president
and chief executive officer, said, "In light of recent
reductions in capital expenditure forecasts from many of our
CLEC [Competitive Local Exchange Carriers] customers, we expect
revenue and earnings to decline in the fourth quarter of 2000 on
a sequential basis."

Just how big will the "decline" be? Copper Mountain now expects
sales to be $60 million for the fourth quarter. It sees pro
forma earnings per share coming in between $0.04 and $0.06.
Analysts had been looking for $0.28 a share.

Gilbert went on to talk about his company's expected fiscal 2001
results. While pointing out that giving guidance that far out is
very difficult, he said he expects sales for fiscal 2001 to be
between $300 million and $330 million. Earnings per share should
be between $0.16 and $0.25. Street analysts were expecting $1.37
a share for Copper Mountain's fiscal 2001.

AFTER-HOURS COVERAGE

INTEL VS. ADVANCED MICRO
By Brian Lund
Intel's revenue warning in September turned out to be cosmetic.
Revenue growth was still strong, margins improved meaningfully,
and earnings came in at original expectations. Intel continues
to dominate its main competitor, AMD.
FULL STORY
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159576
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

RF Micro Devices (Nasdaq: RFMD), the wireless communications
amplifying chip maker, announced its second-quarter earnings
yesterday, and also talked about its expected third-quarter
results. For its Q2, the company met estimates with $0.10 a
share. Net income was $17.7 million on revenues of $102.2
million. Last year in the second quarter, RF Micro Devices
earned $12.5 million on revenues of $68.9 million, or $0.07. The
company then said it was lowering expectations for the third
quarter because of low demand for its products, as well as
product delays. It expects earnings per share to be between
$0.04 and $0.05 a share. Analysts were looking for $0.11 a
share.

International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM) reported its
third-quarter earnings after the market's close yesterday. Sales
grew by 3% to $21.8 billion. This wasn't enough to satisfy
analysts, who were looking for sales to come in at $22.4
billion. Net income for the quarter rose to $2 billion, from
$1.7 billion in the same quarter last year. Earnings per share
were $1.08, versus $0.90 a share last year. This EPS number met
the consensus estimate as reported by First Call/Thompson
Financial. IBM blamed at least some of the weak revenue growth
on an anemic euro. The company claimed its sales would have
risen 6% without those negative currency effects.

Chip maker Xilinx (Nasdaq: XLNX) announced its second-quarter
earnings yesterday after the bell. The company's revenues grew
83% to $437.4 million, from $238.8 million in its second quarter
last year. Net income was $114.1 million, compared to $59.2
million a year ago. Earnings per share beat the consensus
estimate by two cents, coming in at $0.32, versus $0.17 last
year.

Handspring (Nasdaq: HAND) reported its first-quarter results
yesterday afternoon. The company's loss was narrower than
expected. Excluding some deferred stock compensation costs,
Handspring lost $8 million, or $0.08 a share. Analysts polled by
First Call/Thompson Financial expected it to lose $0.12 a share.
Including those costs, the company lost $0.17 a share, or $16.4
million. Handspring's revenues for the quarter were $70.5
million.

Covad Communications Group (Nasdaq: COVD) announced its
third-quarter earnings results yesterday. Revenues were $66.7
million, compared to revenues in the year-ago period of $19.1
million. Covad's net loss was $189.9 million, versus a loss of
$54.1 million the year before. The company's net loss of $1.22
per share was greater than the consensus estimate of $1.18 per
share. In Covad's third quarter last year, it lost $0.47 a
share. Covad's chief executive officer, Robert Knowling, pointed
to his company's clients as the reason the shortfall. "Due to
the weakness in the capital markets, nine of our channel
partners have experienced financing difficulties and have
slipped in their ability to stay current with their accounts
receivable. To conservatively account for this, despite billing
$78.1 million in revenue for the third quarter, only $66.7
million was recorded."

Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up in just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159577
_________________________________________________________________

EDITOR'S PICK

Paul Larson defines this mouthful -- disaggregation and
horizontalization -- and explains how they can increase a company's
competitiveness and shareholder value.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159578
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159579

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159580

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159581

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159582

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159583
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159584
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159585
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159586
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159587
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159588

 Sponsored By: Scottrade
 Fools, Scottrade is the only broker with $7 trades, 120
 local offices & FREE REALTIME STREAMING quotes & charts!
 Apply now!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159589

WIRELESS 201: FREE PREVIEW
 Get a sneak peek at this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159590

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159591

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159592
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId: msg-2616-B10181309Address.msg-09:00:19(10-18-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Rhonda,

You need to check with Genia as I have never handled the physical power agreement matters.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denton, Rhonda L.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:17 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Cc:	Hansen, Leslie
Subject:	Southern Company Netting

Here's Southern.  I never received a copy of the Virginia Electric Master Netting.  We do have netting within the EEI.
 << File: 96096123.pdf >>


Tino, attached is a spreadsheet with the info I think you need.  I got the
publication wrong--its "Megawatt Daily" that posts daily prices.  Hope this
is helpful.  DF

Drew,

Attached is an excel file which contains pricing for the following delivery
points January 1, 1999 through
April 30, 2000:

 Four Corners
 Palo Verde
 Mead Nevada
 Southwest Power Pool

Let me know if you want any additional information.  We can get April 30,
2000 to present information.  I just
have to call RDI--they put it out by quarter so at the end of July we will
get the next disk.  They'll send me the
data if we need it.

Lorna


Sharen,

This price is 29.9 for 287238,  The corresponding deal is 287289 and that
price has been changed to 29.95 to reflect the .05 cents we are charging EES
to do this exchange.

As for 487052, I have down here on my list that 487050 is the corresponding
deal.   I gave the list we had to Kate Symes,  It seems that Bob had
decreased a few of the buy prices by .05 cents and increased the sell side to
the original deal price to collect the .05 cent for epmi.

Please contact Kate with further inquiries.  She will check into this.

Carla

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/03/2001 03:07 PM

To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal # 487238

According to the audit viewer, you entered this deal.  It is part of the PGET
acquisition.  The documentation we have on this deal indicates the price
should be 29.90.

Also, we have documentation that indicates there should be another deal that
matches the terms of #487052, but I thought it should be with PGET.  Number
487052 is with EES.

Can you check into these and let me know.

Thanks!


Michael has asked me to put together a contact list.  Please send me the
following information as soon as possible.

Name
Location
Office number
Fax number
Home address
Home phone
Home fax
Cell number
Pager number

Thank you,

Megan
3-0420


---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

Amy Ruth Ward <award@Stanford.EDU> on 03/13/2000 01:31:54 PM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: summer position

Dear Celeste and Stinson,

I am writing to refuse Enron's offer for a summer position.  After several
conversations with my advisor at Stanford, we have decided that I should
remain at Stanford to work on my dissertation.

Thank you again for taking the time to show me around Enron.

Sincerely,
Amy Ward


thanks

>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 10/11/00 11:51AM >>>
8.   Q. Provide cumulative transaction volumes (million of Mwh) of
electricity (by calendar quarter) for 1999 and 2000.

A.   EES transactions are included in EPMI transaction volumes.

Volumes for WSCC for 2000 are as follows:

1st qrtr  29,619
2nd qtr   44,617
3rd qtr   87,708


Steve, I noticed that our allocation from 2000 to 2001 is going up by 21%
year on year (ie) $13.9M from $11.5M.  We have been able to keep ENA's direct
group expenses flat year on year, we are trying hard to keep the corporate
allocation flat year to year as well.  Do you have a view on how we might be
able to achieve this goal?

Regards
Delainey