Victoria,
Fletch Sturm who works for Kevin Presto will be coordinating this for us.

Regards,
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Victoria Watkins [mailto:vwatkins@pira.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Tim Belden
Subject: FW: UBS & PIRA's Services - Description & Fees

Tim,
Please see below.
Victoria
-----Original Message-----
From: Victoria Watkins [mailto:vwatkins@pira.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com
Cc: Allan Stewart 1; Fletcher Sturm
Subject: RE: PIRA's Services - Description & Fees

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the message. PIRA doesn't have any relationships and/or
agreements with UBS Warburg.

I know Tim Belden in Portland wants to restore several services. Please let
me know the number of people (licensed users) and locations for each
retainer service so I can give you a quote for site licensing fees.

Victoria
212-686-6808, ext. 315

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com [mailto:Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:17 PM
To: vwatkins@pira.com
Cc: Fletcher.J.Sturm@enron.com
Subject: RE: PIRA's Services - Description & Fees

Fletch Sturm (works for me and runs the MW power group) will be following
up with you or Allen.   We need to make sure we coordinate with gas and
west power so no duplication is occurring.    We need to also make sure
that UBS is not already a client who receives PIRA materials.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Victoria Watkins" <vwatkins@pira.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:58 AM
   To:     Tim Belden
   Cc:     Allan Stewart 1; kpresto@enron.com; Black, Tamara Jae
   Subject:  PIRA's Services - Description & Fees

   Hi Tim,

   Thank you the phone message about your continued  interest in PIRA
   Energy Group. I look forward to hearing from you or Kevin  Presto about
   the PIRA analytical services you want to purchase for  your new
   business. (Kevin, I work for Allan Stewart in  PIRA's electricity group
   and also handle sales/marketing of PIRA's  services.)

   Attached  is a description of PIRA's service offerings and an Excel file
   showing a  price matrix with annual fees.   Our base retainer service is
   for up to 10  users at one site (office location) under a site license
   agreement. One retainer  is $25,000 (e.g., natural gas), two retainers
   are $35,000 (e.g.,  electricity and natural gas) and three retainers are
   $40,000 (add  oil).  Fees for additional services such as emissions
   market  intelligence and the daily electricity demand forecast are shown
   to the right of  the main table. Clients with  users of PIRA's services
   in multiple offices can arrange a site license for  higher usage.

   Best regards,
   Victoria
   Victoria Watkins
   PIRA Energy Group
   3 Park Ave., 26th Floor
   New York, NY 10016
   (212) 686-6808, ext. 315

    - Site License MatrixFull.xls << File: Site License MatrixFull.xls >>
    - PIRAPackage Revised.pdf << File: PIRAPackage Revised.pdf >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached is the revised version of our Enron comments memo on the House
electricity restructuring bill.  Please disregard the version that was
e-mailed to you from Cynthia Sandherr on December 15th.  I will be arranging
a conference call shortly to finalize the document.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Allison Navin/Corp/Enron on 12/17/99
10:22 AM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 12/17/99 10:10:32 AM
To: Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Memo Re HR2944

Please see the attached draft memorandum re Comments on H.R. 2944.

 <<Memo Re HR2944 (Word).DOC>>

 - Memo Re HR2944 (Word).DOC


nbc is supposed to film the lodge i work at tomorrow morning at 830.  i
won't be there but they will probably go through the bakery as well.  just
fyi in case you have a tv handy.  also, i may be going over to the canyons
to try to get on the today show....at least as one of those crowd people
with the signs.  i'm thinking that putting "enron refugee" on the sign might
get me some air time.  i am joking of course.  i will send an email if i end
up trying to get on tv.

ciao.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Unplanned Losses - ($1995.02)
Static Sch Fees - $423.00

Total - ($1572.02)

ERCOT Sch Fees - $426.80


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Discuss Training of Business Objects attendees (Rick D., Sheila, N., Steve G.)  Conference room 4194

Date:		9/27/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Daren -

I need a service list contract set up for ENA for the MidTex line for Feb. 00
and March forward for meter 9735, deal # 203469 (XPRTUNG).  Does ENA have a
valid contract to ship on the MidTexas line?  Volume managEment would like
this done before close.  Please let me know.

- Aimee


The following deals have been taken to zero from 6/27/00 to 6/29/00 for the 3
Rivers outage.  Flow should resume on 6/30/00.

137939  12
202362  101
133263  42
296629  30
166810  30
133433  87
138426  918
133344  54
130865  246
137936  18
204859  1800
130510  381
279778  21
136275  70
139092  10
126330  41
125808  1405 (various points)
137632  60 (Various points)
137850  5
137858  1
138456  25
126335  612
138094  1265
93779  2677
266970  2812
113858  7000

Total  19,723


but you owe me a brand new bmw.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:54 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

b/c i want you to understand when i am out of money, but if you owe me
dinner and are out of money i cant understand.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:50 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   how is there a double standard?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:45 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   there is a double standard here so i can't understand

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:40 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      i do understand your situation, but you should understand mine too.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:34 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      probably not.  i think you should understand my situation.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:26 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         how convenient.  actually, i don't really have any money either,
      maybe
         we
         should just call it even.  what do you think?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:16 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         yeah.  i had it picked out and everything.  i had to call the
   dealer
      and
         tell him i am not going to suprise you with it.  we can still go
   to
         dinner
         tomorrow night though.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:33 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            that's too bad.  so, does that mean i'm not getting my bmw from
      you
            anymore?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:33 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            our stock is taking a bath.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:20 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

                i was just about to email you.  why is it worthless?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:14 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               my 401k is now worthless.  i have no money.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:28 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  how was portland

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:49 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  great.  good to hear.  i got back last night.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:15 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     yeah, it was horrible, i didn't think i was going to
   be
      able
         to
               make
                  it.
                     when did you get back.

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Lenhart, Matthew
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                     Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:54 AM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject:

                     did you miss me while i was gone?

   **********************************************************************
                     This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
         relevant
                  affiliate
                     and
                     may contain confidential and privileged material for
   the
         sole
            use
               of
                  the
                     intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
   or
               disclosure
                  by
                     others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
      intended
               recipient
                  (or
                     authorized to receive for the recipient), please
   contact
      the
               sender
                  or
                     reply
                     to Enron Corp. at
      enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
         and
               delete
                     all
                     copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
   attachments
         hereto)
               are
                  not
                     intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
      create
         or
                  evidence
                     a
                     binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
   (or
      any
         of
               its
                     affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
      party,
         and
            may
                  not
                     be
                     relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
      estoppel
         or
                  otherwise.
                     Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


There is a sale to CES for a volume of 34,248 dts, deal 149430.  It has your
name on it.  My conterpart at CES does not recognize it.  According to Unify
the downstream k# is 94946.  If you did this deal, do you remember who you
did the deal with?

Thanks.


I have hard copies that I will send to you by interoffice mail.

	Kathy Neal/ENRON@enronXgate
	Sent by: Ramona Perkins/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/21/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Missing 2000 YE Evaluations

 URGENT   URGENT  URGENT  URGENT

You have been identified as a supervisor who has not completed a 2000 year
end evaluation form for some of your employees.   Please review the following
names and take a moment to complete an evaluation form for your employees.

1.  Linda Guinn
2.  Claudia Meraz
3.  Twanda Sweet

Please note that it is extremely important for all employees, that go through
our PRC process, to have an original signed evaluation form  IN THEIR
PERSONNEL FILE.

If you have ANY questions, please contact me at ext. 5-7803 or my assistant,
Ramona Perkins at ext. 5-8165.

Thank You.


If it were me I'd go for the standard limo, mostly because I've never seen
the other kind.


Rogers:
Just wanted to meet up tomorrow for a few minutes to discuss some trading
opportunities.  I think you said tomorrow at 3:30 pm would work for you.
Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


Twanda, would you please print this and also the attachment -- with the
notes?  Thanks.  MHC

----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 11:00 AM -----

	Jane Allen
	05/02/2000 08:47 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Green Card

I have prepared the attached and forwarded to Drew Lynch.  I am meeting with
him today.  From my understanding, he agrees with the attached, so we can
move forward with the payback letter.  Can you assist?

Thanks,

Jane

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 08:45 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           03/13/2000 03:40 PM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Green Card

I agree but there is still no policy in place.  We need to develop a
mechanism for charging the green cards as well.  Can you assist me with
drafting something that I can get the individuals to sign?  We currently have
about 25 in process.

Thanks,

Jane

Michelle Cash
03/13/2000 03:34 PM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Green Card

Jane,

When the Green Card Task Force was alive, we discussed a payback provision if
the person left within two years after receiving a green card (voluntarily).
Is this being done?  If not, I think we should talk about it, given all the
time, energy, resources, funds, etc., being expended on getting a person a
green card.

Michelle


my no. 1 choice does not want to work for me.  i've got to stop wearing that
belt of skulls around the office.....

any comments on colleen?????
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 12/06/2000
07:31 PM ---------------------------

Colleen Metz
12/06/2000 02:07 PM
Sent by: Colleen Metz
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: research analyst position

Good afternoon, Mr. Soldano! I was just wondering if you've made any
decisions regarding this position yet?  It's getting cold up here in Omaha!
Looking forward to hearing from you. CM


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 03:22
PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
08/28/2000 02:20 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spot or Firm Tickets

Bob,

Please see the responses below highlighted in red.

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
02:20 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           08/24/2000 06:08 PM

To: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spot or Firm Tickets

Vance,

The following nominations do not have deal tickets in Sitara for September,
2000 activity.  Please advise whether the deals will be spot or firm.  Daren
wants everything in Sitara by 3pm on Monday, August 28.  Thanks.

Bob

Source   Meter #  Sept Nom  Type of purchase Status

CCGM, LP  9840  1,000   Firm    ticket submitted today
Cross-Tex  5467  250   Firm   requested via e-mail
Cummins & Walker UNK  500   Firm (not flowing) will request spot ticket when
well commences to flow
Dallas Production 6789  12,519   Spot   requested via e-mail
Duke Energy Trading 6347  206   Spot   requested via e-mail
EEX Operating  5999  11,632   Firm   ticket submitted today
EOG Resources 4157  76   Firm   ticket has been submitted under Hughes
Investments
HESCO Gathering 9624  100   Firm   deal needs to reflect "evergreen"
provision (flag)
HESCO Gathering 9835  700   Firm (not flowing) will request spot ticket when
well commences to flow
PH Exploration  6838  94   Firm   deal was recently rolled into extended term
Pioneer Exploration 2698  1,000   Firm (not flowing) will request spot ticket
when well commences to flow
Pure Resources 9830  500   Firm    ticket submitted today
Rio Vista  6442  609   No longer buying contracted terminated effective 8/15
Samson Lonestar 9845  2,886   Firm   ticket submitted last week
Swift Energy  2630  322   Spot   requested via e-mail
TEMA Oil & Gas 4688  1   Firm   deal needs to reflect "evergreen" provision
(flag)
Tri-Union Develop. 2697  700   Firm (not flowing) will request spot ticket
when well commences to flow
Whiting Petroleum 6523  100   Spot   requested via e-mail


---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:23 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Kimberly S Olinger                           04/10/2001 05:50 AM

To:	Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT, Suzanne Christiansen/HOU/ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, "LeJune, Susie" <Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com> @ ENRON, Lisa Purser <lpurser@lesliecorp.com> @ ENRON, "Melissa Reese" <mreese@cmsenergy.com> @ ENRON, Sally McElroy <smcelroy@howellcorp.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Fw: Fw: Are you with the 98%?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 07:26 AM ---------------------------

"Angi Williamson" <awilliamson@houston.rr.com> on 04/09/2001 11:18:38 PM
To:	"Rita Welsh home" <rwelsh1@columbus.rr.com>, "Joan Pearson" <Mjpearson006@aol.com>, "Nancy Parten" <nancy.parten@totalfinaelf.com>, "Kim Olinger" <Kimberly.S.Olinger@enron.com>, "Lori McCartney" <lori_mccartney@agfg.com>, "Kayla Farrar" <kayla.farrar@totalfinaelf.com>, "Ursula Cooper" <ursula.cooper@totalfinaelf.com>, "Eileen Conley" <eileen.conley@totalfinaelf.com>, "Sandra Bartz" <Sandra.Bartz@usa.apachecorp.com>
cc:
Subject:	Fw: Fw: Are you with the 98%?

----- Original Message -----
From: <Stan2dot@aol.com>
To: <awilliamson@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 7:41 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Are you with the 98%?

>
>

Return-Path: <whoy1932@netpluscom.com>
Received: from  rly-zd05.mx.aol.com (rly-zd05.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.229]) by air-zd01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:20:45 -0400
Received: from  netplus1.netpluscom.com (netplus1.netpluscom.com [207.140.80.4]) by rly-zd05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 10:44:14 -0400
Received: from whoy1932.netpluscom.com (s26.as2.nwk.netpluscom.com [12.2.246.29])	by netplus1.netpluscom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA25973;	Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:43:48 -0400
Message-ID: <001f01c0c0ff$40630ac0$1df6020c@whoy1932.netpluscom.com>
From: "Bill & Gert" <whoy1932@netpluscom.com>
To: "Carolyn & Lou" <clvacca@msmisp.com>
Cc: "Dot & Stan" <stan2dot@aol.com>
Subject: Fw: Are you with the 98%?
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:13:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01C0C0DD.B058F820"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

> Subject: Freaky-a little  fun
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> >  > > > > After you have a little fun with this "freaky  test," try to
figure
> > > > > > out why it  works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are  you the 2% or 98% of the population ?
> > > > > >
>  > > > > > Follow the instructions!
> > > > >  >
> > > > > > NO PEEKING AHEAD!
> > > >  > >
> > > > > > Free will or synaptic wiring?   You be the judge.
> > > > > >
> > > > >  > *   Do the following exercise, guaranteed to raise an eyebrow.
> > > > > > *   There's no trick or surprise.
> > > > > > *    Just follow these  instructions, and answer the questions
one
> at
> > a
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > and as  quickly as you can!
> > > > > >
> > > >  > > *    Again, as quickly as you can but don't advance  until you've
> > done
> > > > > > each of them  ... really.
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > *    Now, scroll down (but not too fast, you might  miss
> something).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > > *   Think of a number from 1 to 10
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > > Multiply that number by 9
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > > If the number is a 2-digit number, add the digits  together
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > > Now subtract 5
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > > Determine which letter in the alphabet corresponds to the
> > number
> > > > > > > > > you ended  up with (example: 1=A, 2=B, 3=C, 4=D, etc.)
> > > > > >  > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > > Think of a country that starts with that  letter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > > Remember the last letter of the name of that  country
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > > Think of the name of an animal that starts with  that
letter
> > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > > Remember the last letter in the name of  that animal
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  Think of the name of a fruit that starts with that letter
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you  thinking of a Kangaroo in Denmark eating an
Orange?
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >  > > > > I told you this was FREAKY!!
> > > > >  > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If not,  you're among the 2% of the population whose minds
> are
> >  > > > > different enough to think of something else.
> >  > > >
> > > > > > > > > 98% of people  will answer with kangaroos in Denmark when
> given
> > >  > > > this exercise.
> > > > > > > > >  Freaky, huh?
> > > > > > > > >
> > >  > > > > > > Keep this message going. This one is actually  worth
sending
> on
> > > to
> > > > >  > > > >  others.
> > > > > > > >  > Forward it to people you know and see if they are usual or
> >  > > > > unusual.


Please see the attached report distributed at the last quarterly meeting.

 If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.

Thanks,
Ted
X-37952


Attached are our nomination forms for the Griffith Power Plant for gas day
Tuesday, February 26, 2002.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!
MaryAnne Schneider
office #  801-537-3985
cell #    801-580-1466

(See attached file: NOMS_02_26_02.xls)
 - NOMS_02_26_02.xls


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 02:41 PM -----

	Terry West
	02/09/2001 01:36 PM

		 To: Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Board presentations

Attached are the presentations for the Corporate Staff Group and the 2001
Goals.  There have been slight modifications to the format.


Hi Folks,

This is getting murkier by the minute.  Coach Jim Haslett was pumping up the
team with the "it's just one player" talk following the loss of Ricky
Williams and indicated New Orleans would likely not go outside for RB help.
Former Ram Jerald Moore and rookie Chad Morton were slated to carry the
load.  But they did go out and sign Terry Allen Tuesday.  I'm not sure
whether this indicates a lack of confidence in Moore / Morton.  It could be
they thought Allen was a bargain and it certainly can't hurt to have him for
insurance.

As far as the RB distribution goes, I'm kind of leaning toward Moore seeing
a good bit of work with Morton seeing more 3rd down type duties.  Sort of
like the Patriots are doing with JR Redmond and Kevin Faulk.  Honestly, it's
tough to call right now and the Saints understandably are being tight lipped
about their plans.

Here's the story from USA Today.  Thanks to our friend Leo Scanlon for
pointing me to it.

Joe

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/news.htm#saints NEW ORLEANS - Saints
running back Ricky Williams will have surgery Wednesday on the broken left
ankle that ended his regular season. Williams, hurt Sunday against Carolina
on a run that gave him exactly 1,000 yards for the year, is expected to need
6-to-8 weeks of rehabilitation. New Orleans signed former Pro Bowl running
back Terry Allen for the rest of the season on Tuesday. The team waived wide
receiver Charlie Jones to make room on the active roster. Allen started for
New England last season, leading the team in rushing with 896 yards and
eight touchdowns, but wasn't re-signed by the Patriots. Allen was selected
for the 1996 Pro Bowl while with the Washington Redskins and ranks fifth
among active players with 7,777 yards rushing.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
11:17 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/07/2000 10:47:25 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: WC 551 Cancellation of Force Majeure Effective 6/6/00

Ami,
The attached is a notice canceling the force majeure situation on WC 551
effective 6/6/00.  The platform was down 5/30/00 - 6/5/00.

Let me know of any questions you have.

Steve

 - WC551forcemajeure0530002cancellation.doc


Ken Curry is your man Tana ( 3-6165

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Bradford, William S.; Brackett, Debbie; Rohauer, Tanya; Reves, Brant;
Ngo, Tracy; Campbell, Lesli; Espinoza, Veronica; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq,
Wendi; Diamond, Russell; Moran, Tom; Sacks, Edward; Mendoza, Nidia; Conwell,
Wendy; Vanek, Darren; Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Daishowa

I got a call from National Bank of Canada and they said that we purchased the
referenced company and what did we intend to do with the trade between NBC
and Daishowa?  Anyone know anything about this?


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/13/2001>, published as of 09/13/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Thanks much. I will get Bob to work with her on this.

JWVS

	Alan Aronowitz@ECT
	03/01/2001 04:05 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: San Juan Puerto Rico LNG - EPC and Firewater tank contracts

Coralina Rivera is the lawyer in our group who works on PR matters. I am
having her contact you.

Alan

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/01/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: San Juan Puerto Rico LNG - EPC and Firewater tank contracts

Gents, we have been asked to provide documentation support for EGM on this
job, which includes some environmental remediation. Can you direct me to the
lawyer you guys have handling this so we are sure to get  on the same page?
Bill Middleton's nice summary two notes down references Greg Curran if that
helps you find the responsibility center over there.

JWVS
----- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/01/2001 12:12
PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg
	03/01/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: William Middleton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Renee
Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron,
Stephen P Stein@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: San Juan Puerto Rico LNG - EPC and Firewater tank contracts

Thanks for the data, Bill. Please use Bob as your future contact for
contracting support.

Bob, please work with Scott Dieball for EAS legal input. I will find out who
at EGM legal we should be liasing with since eventually their sign-off will
likely be required.

 Thanks.

JWVS

	William Middleton
	02/28/2001 03:12 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Renee
Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: San Juan Puerto Rico LNG - EPC and Firewater tank contracts

John,

This job is the 6 segment OE LNG  project in Puerto Rico for EGM benefiting
San Juan Gas that will add EPC LNG truck loading facilities at Penuelas,
purchase 2 reconditioned trailers to haul the LNG across PR to San Juan Gas'
SJ facility.  At SJGas, the 4 project segments are (1) remediating of ~ 8000
m3 of lightly contaminated soils (Enron bought the liability when they bought
the plant), (2) EPC installation of a new 350,000 gal firewater tank to
replace the existing one, (3) demolition of the of the existing 3,000,000 gal
former gas holder fire water tank, and (4) EPC installation of an LNG truck
unloading, storage and vaporization facility.
Enron's corporate remediation contractor ThermoRetec has been retained to
manage the remediation and existing FW tank demolition.  EAS will coordinate
these efforts with the balance of the project segments.

The new fire water tank was always an EPC effort.

The AFE's for the job have  been split into 484a & 593 at Owner's request .
484a is approved by EGM's Greg Curran but has not been signed yet because EGM
has not completed their DASH effort with Risk Management.  EECC performed the
initial FEED for the Truck Unloading segment under an approved AFE.  This
project has not been DASH'd because EECC does not have a risk position in any
of this work. To date all work has been done with the full involvement of EGM
& San Juan Gas.  The 2nd AFE is currently on hold at Owner's request.

The contract that will be produced will be between EGM and the Contractors
with EAS acting as OE.

The Owner is expected to authorize EAS to award the new FW tank EPC on
Friday.  At that time we would need to be able to issue the successful bidder
a letter of intent if the contract draft is not ready.

I will include Bob Sevitz on all future correspondence.  Renee' has done a
very good job and has represented EECC/EAS and the Owner well from the first
day.

Allthough I am in Denver for the balance of the week, my cell phone is 281
744 5234 and I can be reached here on it.  Please do not hesitate to call.

Regards and thanks for your continuing help.

Bill

John Schwartzenburg
02/28/2001 07:28 AM
To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stephen P Stein@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
Middleton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Renee
Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James C
Davis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: San Juan Puerto Rico LNG  - EPC and Firewater tank contracts
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

Yesterday we were asked to prepare a construction contract for the pruchase
and installation of a firewater tank for the San Juan Puerto Rico job. I
understand that this originally had been slated to be done as a PO only,
until construction was added to the scope late in the day.  We will work to
get the contract drafted as quickly as possible.

I also understand that the bid is to be awarded this week, so before we
launch a contract I wanted to make sure that any DASH, AFE or other
authorization for the expenditure is in place.

Generally, the contract work on this project will be transitioning from Renee
Alfaro to Bob Sevitz.

JWVS


6uldv8_99
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:30 PM
To:	'jose13580@yahoo.com'
Subject:	thank you letter

I am writing to you as Co-chair of the 2001 Enron Kids program.

A lot of ex-Enron folks who use your website were involved in this year's Gordon Elementary School adoption program.  Many of these people sacrificed some of their own Christmas so that kids at Gordon Elementary would not be let down.  I would like them to know that their efforts were truly appreciated by the students, faculty, and especially those of us on the Committee.  Would you please consider posting on your site the attached thank-you letter from the school?

thank you
Kevin Hyatt
Co-Chair
Enron Kids Committee 2001


CONGRATULATION on the new position.

:)  ,

Amie Ha


Louise,

Thanks. His E-mail address is ekrapels@esaibos.com. The company

coordinates are as follows:

ESAI
301 Edgewater Place, Suite 108
Wakefield, MA 01880
(781) 245-2036
(781) 245-8706

Vince

Louise Kitchen
02/11/2000 05:13 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Ed Krapels

Absolutely - I can't find the previous email but it may have been lost during
the few days they moved my email box from London to Houston - I know I had a
lot of lost emails - do you have his phone number and email and we can sort
out a password for a few days for him too.

Louise

Vince J Kaminski
10/02/2000 22:15
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Ed Krapels

Louise,

Some time ago I sent you a message regarding Ed Krapels. He is writing a book
on energy
commodity markets and would like to learn more about EOL.

Can you give him a  call and chat with him for 10 minutes. He is a good
friend of Enron and
it would be free ad for us.

Vince


Chris --

I am not too optimistic that we are going to get either the CPUC or the
California Legislature to provide for competitive default supply.   I don't
think that the utilities would want it nor do I think that with all of the
other problems in California this will occur within the next 12 months.

The best chance is simply to get the utilities to recognize (as the call from
SCE appears to indicate) that there is price risk with their residual load
and to seek to forward contract.  We are working (and I think that there is a
strong sentiment amongst most California electricity wonks) to remove any
barriers to utilities contracting forward.  This should put EPMI on a level
footing to compete to manage the UDCs price risk with other people in the
industry.

Government Affairs met today in SF to discuss our goals for the upcoming
Legislative session (which promises to be very interesting).  Competitive
default supply is on the agenda, but I would put it behind utility forward
contracting on the list of priorities.

Jim

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	11/30/2000 11:30 AM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Edison Full Requirements

Jill Horswell, the head of trading at SCE, just called.  She said the CEO of
SCE asked her to call around and see if energy marketing companies would be
interested in offering the "Duke SDG&E Structure," (i.e full requirements at
$60/MWhr) to SCE.  I told her that that would be a big bite for anyone, and
that the price would be well north of $60, but we would be interested in
coming up with a structure for their consideration if they wanted to take
this a step further.

We decided in the case of SDG&E that we didn't have an interest in a true
full requirements deal given the size (3,000 MW) and the difficulty in
managing the load fluctuations, credit risks, etc.  The size and scope of a
similar deal with SCE (20,000 MW) would be even more daunting.

Is this an opportunity to propose a new market structure for serving load to
try to build part of the solution to California's energy woes?  How should
the default provider be determined?  How can credit and load fluctuation
risks be managed?  Can we build a consortium of market support amongst our
fellow defendants (i.e Duke, Southern, et al)?

Let me know what you think.

Chris


This could be big...

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010129/n29305829.html


Hi Mark,

Here is the answer to your question about the undocumented fault messages
(those without text descriptions). They should not influence the statistical
counters ("turbine OK" still increments after the faults occur) and do not
effect the behavior of the turbine.

-Garth

---------------------- Forwarded by Garth Ripton/EWC/Enron on 06/07/2002
11:09 AM ---------------------------
From: Gert Torbohm@TWTDE on 06/07/2002 02:58 PM CED
To: Garth Ripton/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Andre Riesberg/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Detlef Menke/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE,
Till Hoffmann/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Clemens W"ste/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE

Subject: Antwort: Undocumented fault messages

Hi Garth,
we don't know the reason for these 'fault' appearances, yet. It has to do
with the communication between PC and PLC.
But : it did not influence the status of the turbine, neither it shuts down,
nor downtime counts up.
In version 1x629 the solve the problem, but the real cause is not solves,
until now. Clemens will work on it.

What's the time schedule for updating V1x629 ?
Best regards and nice weekend
Gert.

	Garth Ripton@ENRON
	06.06.02 22:07

		 An: Andre Riesberg/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Detlef Menke/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE,
Gert Torbohm/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Till Hoffmann/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE, Klaus
Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
		 Kopie:
		 Thema: Undocumented fault messages
Hallo Zusammen,

I received a document from our operations department that shows the occurence
of faults at the Mill Run site for the month of April. There are a number of
"undocumented" fault/status messages that are logged frequently:

"EM247" 102 times
"EM242" 102 times
"EM238" 101 times
"EM237" 101 times
"EM235" 101 times
"EM312" 56 times
"EM280" 56 times
"EM248" 56 times
"EM304" 52 times
"EM272" 52 times
"EM311" 51 times
"EM306" 51 times
"EM302" 51 times
"EM301" 51 times
"EM299" 51 times
"EM279" 51 times
"EM274" 51 times
"EM270" 51 times
"EM240" 51 times
"EM269" 50 times
"EM267" 50 times

Most of these fault were logged on turbine 5 and turbine 6 (with a few on
turbine 7). They are not distributed between all the turbines but isolated on
a few.

The major question that that operations asked me was which production
statistic timer was incremented when these conditions were logged. My guess
is that since none of these stop the turbine that the "OK" timer continued to
increment. Is this correct?

The question that I have is: what is causing so many of these messages in the
log? Do these status messages have any specific meaning? According to the
documentation there are only about 220 messages that have descriptions in the
error list data base (in VisuPro v1.27.0.0). Where are the other messages
coming from? (This is version 13527 Bachmann software.) I think this issue
was brought up several months ago but I don't think we got any additional
information.

Gru?,

Garth


Please respond to Dear RealMoney.com Subscribers,

It's hysterically funny what people are demanding
of my personal account. People want it updated
immediately and they want the ideas ahead of when
I actually buy (I am doing that). In fact I am letting
our readers front-run me on everything! I reveal what
I am about to recommend and I recommend before I buy.

That's the total antidote to the way Wall Street works.
They want to know how much money I am putting into each
stock. Done. They want the dates that I did it. Harder
because I buy in small increments. They want my stop-loss
limits if I could stop-loss out. I can't do that because
of my holding period, but I will do it anyway and just
not sell. They want better performance and they want it
yesterday or at least when I started this game, and the
market was much higher.

Hey, I am listening! Exclusively on RealMoney.com, you
now have access to my own Personal Portfolio, which is
made up of my picks, shares owned, basis, current value
and gains that he buys and sells on a day-to-day basis.

As of Friday, the portfolio market value is $1,247,537
making me a profit of $124,650.03.

Don't miss a move, click here to see what I am up to:
http://www.thestreet.com/p/rmoney/wrong/1405119.html

If your account has expired, please click here to
re-subscribe to RealMoney.com:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/Sub_Center/subcenter.jhtml

Sincerely,

Jim Cramer
Chief Markets Commentator
TheStreet.com

This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because
you are a current or former subscriber
(either free-trial or paid) to one of our web sites,
www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you
received this message in error, please forward this
message to members@realmoney.com, or call our customer
service department at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our
subscribers. To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

If you would prefer not to receive these types of emails
from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M


Maria, I wanted to follow up after discussions with you and Shelley, the SoCal window is based on what SoCal
    is willing to confirm into their system for the day.  It does not necessarily have anything to do with physical capacity at Needles.
    If you have any questions, please let us know.  Thanks.  Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Blair, Lynn; January, Steven; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject: FW: sid letter

Please look at the insert below and let me know if you believe it to be a reasonable description of the Socal windowing process from the customers' perspective

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Mary Kay
Sent: Thu 8/2/2001 2:11 PM
To: Fossum, Drew; Pavlou, Maria; Hartsoe, Joe; Harris, Steven; Porter, Gregory J.; 'stojic@gbmdc.com'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'
Cc: Corman, Shelley; Hass, Glen
Subject: RE: sid letter

Looks ok to me, but make sure that Shelley also reviews as her group deals with the windowing issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Fossum, Drew
Sent:   Thursday, August 02, 2001 1:59 PM
To:     Pavlou, Maria; Hartsoe, Joe; Harris, Steven; Porter, Gregory J.; 'stojic@gbmdc.com'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; Miller, Mary Kay

Subject:        RE: sid letter

I'll defer to you guys on getting the specific words right, but it would be great if we can get something like this.  Steve Harris needs to take a close look to make sure we are describing the windowing impacts correctly.  Lawyers:  will a letter from Sid be admissable evidence under FERC evidence rules?  We may need to ask them to have Scott sign it instead of their lawyer to assure admissability.  DF

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Pavlou, Maria
Sent:   Thursday, August 02, 2001 1:35 PM
To:     Hartsoe, Joe; Harris, Steven; Porter, Gregory J.; Fossum, Drew; 'stojic@gbmdc.com'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; Miller, Mary Kay

Subject:        sid letter

Richardson has agreed to send us an additional writing regarding the other justifications for the volumetric negotiated rate.   Joe Koury asked me to email the insert to the letter.   Koury told me that he would reference the July 26 order and the fact that the Commission has requested additional information as to why the shipper entered into the subject negotiated rate transaction, with Scott Walker stating that in reviewing his previous responses he would clarify by adding the following:

Insert:

Richardson Products proposed to share in a rate based on a daily spread as a volumetric rate because under that rate arrangement if the gas did not flow, Richardson was not obligated to pay Transwestern the rate.  Richardson desired to avoid the risk, under normal demand service, of having to pay the rate if the gas did not flow.   The issue of whether the gas would flow was a very real one at the California border (Needles delivery point) given the manner in which SoCalGas, the downstream party, confirms volumes for delivery with Transwestern.   Specifically, SoCalGas has a windowing procedure whereby it limits the amount of gas that Transwestern can deliver into Needles based on SoCalGas' allocation procedures and the amount of available takeaway capacity at the delivery point. [True?]  Simply stated, if SoCalGas did not confirm Richardson's nomination at the Needles delivery point, the gas would not flow.    The negotiated rate, as opposed to the rate for normal demand service, allowed Richardson to avoid the risks associated with Richardson's gas not flowing due to SoCalGas's windowing procedure.

 Pls. review and comment asap.   I promised Joe K.  I would get it to him tonight or first thing tomorrow because he will be out all next week and agreed to take care of this matter this week.  Thanks, Maria


mark:
Any thoughts on whether we should give in with respect to the consequential
damages issue?
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000
06:16 PM ---------------------------

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/17/2000 01:38 AM
To: Carol St Clair@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: EnronOnline

Carol,

we have one remaining issue outstanding with United Energy on the ETA. They
are still insisting on a exclusion of "consequential losses" from the
indemnity given clause 4(a) of the ETA. Two questions
Do we have a position on agreeing to exclude consquential losses from this
clause? My own view is in this instance it is going to be somewhat "hit and
miss" as what would be a consequential loss and what is not. That being said
the general Enron position is to exclude consequential losses. In fact such a
provision is already in the GTCs in respect of any Transaction.  Hence if
there was a Transaction consequentiallossess would then presumably be
excluded in respect of a related breach of the ETA.
Utilicorp is a substantial equity holder in United Energy. I understand they
are trading through EnronOnline. Do we know what they have agreed?
---------------------- Forwarded by David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/17/2000 05:15 PM ---------------------------

David Minns
04/12/2000 06:12 PM
To: "Creek, Peggy" <pcreek@ue.com.au> @ ENRON
cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connell
Burke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EnronOnline

Peggy further my previous email. Two additional points;

I believe it is best for us  to move to replace the Deemed ISDA Agreement.
This will provide a cleaner contractual basis for EnronOnline trades. We
should be able to settle a  ISDA  Master Agreement quite swiftly  using the
existing commmercial terms in the Deemed ISDA. If you are concur with this
course of action we will forward to you tomorrow  a Schedule  for  review.
In respect of Section 4(b) of the ETA we would be agreeable to add the
following at its end:  "unless such access, entry, omission or action arises
from acts or omissions of Enron and its directors, officers, employees,
agents or contractors.''

David Minns
04/11/2000 03:01 PM
To: "Creek, Peggy" <pcreek@ue.com.au> @ ENRON
cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EnronOnline

Peggy my apologies for not replying sooner but I was overseas.  Let me
respond to the points you raised.

Deemed ISDA Agreement- We would be most happy to provide a letter that you
could aknowledge that the Deemed ISDA Agreement is a master agreement for the
purposes of the ETA. I would prefer not to make a formal amendment as this
may exclude a subsequent Master Agreement from applying.
Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd. is the Enron counterparty for all Australian
power trades. If that is your preference then access can be limited to only
those products. You could write to us stating this is your position. However,
we have found that counterparties have not found this necessary. Your
EnronOnline Master User will set access levels for your individual traders.
Many counterparties appoint a person from their Controls group (not a Trader)
as their Master User.   This gives them the flexibility to broaden/ reduce
access themselves.
Excluding "consequential loss" in this circumstance is quite broad but if we
could work through some scenarios hopefully we could find some words to
accomodate your concerns.
When we last spoke you mentioned the concern here was the possibility that
the password may be disclosed from other than a UE source ie Enron. I have
talked this issue through with our systems people as to the nature of this
exposure. What happens is that the password which is issued to a user is
immediately changed after it is received from Enron. Hence the source of the
password must be the relevant counterparty. Whether improper use is a result
of the counterparty's negilence or some other cause such as an unauthorised
use or disclosure by one of its personnel is not relevant. What is of concern
that the loss would have resulted from or arose out of a Counterparty's
"access to or utilisation of the Website".

Perhaps you would give me a call so we may discuss any outstanding points.

David Minns
Senior Legal Counsel
Phone 612 9229 2310
Fax  612 9229 2350

"Creek, Peggy" <pcreek@ue.com.au> on 03/31/2000 12:45:47 PM
To: "'david.minns@enron.com'" <david.minns@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: EnronOnline

David

Further to our conversation this week regarding our outstanding issues in
the Electronic Trading Agreement, UE suggests the following way foreward.

Enron sends a letter to UE to be countersigned.  This letter covers the
following:

* it is a variation to the ETA;
* all Transactions entered through EnronOnline will be covered by the
Deemed ISDA Master Agreement signed between UE and Enron Australia Finance
and dated 8th Feb 1999;
* Transactions at this stage will only be between UE and Enron
Australia Finance;
* amend clause 4(b) to exclude indemnification against consequential
loss;
* amend clause 4(b)(ii) of the ETA to remove the wording "whether or
not Counterparty has authorized such access" and provide appropriate
replacement wording that ensures UE is only liable where access is obtained
through UE's negligence.

Please let me know if Enron would agree to this.

Regards
Peggy


Enron Asks US FERC To Link Mkt-Based Pwr Rates With RTOs

11/20/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Enron Power Marketing Inc. is urging federal
regulators to withdraw the authority of several electric utilities in the
U.S. Southeast to sell power at market rates if they fail to join an approved
independent grid-asset operator by Dec. 15, 2001.
The Enron Corp. (ENE) power-marketing unit made the suggestion in filings
Friday in response to the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
December 1999 order encouraging U.S. utilities to turn their high-voltage
transmission assets over to independent control of regional transmission
organizations, or RTOs.
The filing came the same day that FERC Commissioner William Massey told a
gathering of energy lawyers that he would seek to ensure that FERC - on a
generic, national basis - makes preservation of market-based sales authority
by utilities contingent upon their joining an FERC-approved RTO.
Enron limited the applicability of its filing to RTO proposals from utilities
in the U.S. Southeast: Carolina Power & Light Co. (CPL), Duke Energy Corp.
(DUK), Florida Power Corp. (FPC), Florida Power & Light Co. (FPL), South
Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (SCG), Southern Co. (SO). Tampa Electric Co. (TE)
and the Southwest Power Pool Inc.
Absent participation in a FERC-approved RTO, "there is no basis for the
commission to assume that a transmission owner has mitigated its transmission
market power and ability to discriminate against its transmission-dependent
competitors," Enron said in its filing.
Enron noted that FERC called for creation of RTOs after determining that its
landmark 1996 rules requiring open-access transmission services weren't
enough to assure that vertically integrated utilities couldn't control their
transmission assets to financial gain in competitive wholesale power markets.
"The commission has repeatedly recognized that vertically integrated
transmission system owners have an inherent incentive to use their
transmission monopolies to discriminate in favor of their own and affiliated
power merchant activities," Enron said.
The Houston energy giant noted that FERC staff, in a report detailing
findings of a national investigation of problems affecting competitive
wholesale power markets nationally, found that market participants in the
Southeastern U.S. have less confidence than market participants in other
regions of the country that their transactions won't be subject to
discriminatory practices.
"Selling power at market-based (as opposed to cost-based) rates is not a
right, but rather a privilege enjoyed by sellers that can demonstrate that
they are price takers, unable to exercise market power," Enron said.
"Any vertically integrated transmission monopoly that stops short of taking
every step that the commission identifies as needed to abate market power and
root out discrimination should be denied the privilege of selling power at
market-based rates. It simply cannot be trusted not to abuse the privilege,"
Enron said.
-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Successfully, missed another bullet !!!  I have meetings set up with Mariella
(the lady you like) and Dan Castingnola, who are the two highest ranked
performers in CALME, to see if they are interested in joining our team.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
05:15 PM ---------------------------
 Office of the Chairman
From: Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 09/06/2000 05:10 PM
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Organizational Changes

In support of Enron,s continuing efforts to increase its return on invested
capital and direct resources towards our highest return businesses, David
Haug, Chairman and CEO of Enron CALME, Jim Hughes, President and COO of Enron
APACHI, Joe Kishkill, Managing Director of Enron South America, and Frank
Stabler, formerly a Managing Director of Enron CALME, will join Mark Metts in
a corporate wide effort, to help monetize some of Enron,s assets.  David will
help transition the CALME business activities into other parts of Enron while
working with Mark on the asset monetization projects.  David will continue as
an Executive Vice President for Enron Corp and a member of Enron,s Executive
Committee.  Cliff Baxter will oversee this effort.

Consistent with these changes, the CALME group will be divided as follows.
Enron Global LNG and Enron,s Caribbean Basin activities will become part of
the new Enron Global Markets (EGM) group headed by Mike McConnell.  Rick
Bergsieker, President/COO of LNG will continue in that role and in his dual
role as President/COO of Enron Middle East, which will also join EGM. Shawn
Cumberland, President and COO of the Caribbean Basin unit and his executive
team will carry out the transition process for the Caribbean business unit's
people and businesses as part of EGM.  Management of its Colombia and
Venezuela businesses will transfer to Enron South America and its LNG-related
activities to EGM as described above.

The EES related initiatives and people will be transferred to those units.
All of the various international businesses will participate as usual in the
upcoming budget process with their new alignment and continue to meet their
plan targets for 3rd and 4th quarters.

Concurrently, we are consolidating our trading and merchant activities in
Japan and Australia into Enron Europe.  Joe Hirl and Paul Quilkey will report
to Enron Europe,s Office of the Chairman.

We congratulate David Haug and Rebecca McDonald for proposing these
realignments, which we agree, will maximize both the financial and
intellectual capital in Enron.  Over the coming weeks, specific assignments
and reporting relationships will be determined and communicated.


Please check the dates for that OpRisk seminar in New York and put those on
my calendar tentatively.  I got a message from Shona trying to schedule a
trip to Mexico and she thought that the week of February 5th looked good.  I
assume that she checked with you and that my calendar looked clear.  While I
have not yet made a decision on attending the NY seminar, I do need to hold
those dates.  I left Shona a message telling her that the week of February 19
would be better.  --Sally


Steve --  A few months ago, Erin Rice approached me about the idea of
creating a Chief Morale Officer for Enron, a relatively new concept she had
read about.   I asked her to write up a position description (attached).
Last week, Meredith and I attended a media conference in San Francisco with
all the top new media and traditional business/financial publications, and
the big story trend is corporate culture and what's new and different at
companies.  A CMO would give Enron a unique angle to participate in (and
pitch) culture stories and increase our exposure (and help with recruiting).
It would also serve an incredible need internally to have an executive who
was responsive, accessible to employees and had the ability to resolve
problems.  In looking at the organization, I thought someone like Cindy Olson
would be perfect for a CMO.  Just wanted to pass along this suggestion to see
what you thought.

Thanks.
kd


All:

Attached you will find a list that reflects your seat assignments for Business Continuity Planning (BCP).  These seats are located on the 30th and 31st Floors of Enron Center North (ECN).  As previously communicated, you will report to these designated seats in the event of an outage in ECS.

The exception to this is as follows:
If your seat assignment is located on the 31st Floor, you will report to your original location that you occupied prior to your move into ECS.  This will hold true until the Monday after Thanksgiving, as we will have the 31st floor seats set up at that time.

Testing:
Once you have moved to ECS, if you would like to test your BCP location, you will be able to test your seat for functionality every Thursday from 3-6pm.  Testing is not required, but is highly recommended.

If anyone has any questions or concerns about these procedures, please feel free to contact me at any time.

Regards,

Stephen R. Harrington
Technical Project Manager, ECS Project
Enron Net Works, LLC
w:  713-853-7619
p:  877-651-7361
c:  713-444-7279
stephen.harrington@enron.com


Whichever one of you has the great good fortune to work on the subject,
please note the following:

All 5 additional events of default should also be Material Adverse Changes
with respect to the ability to hold collateral.

In addition to the financial triggers indicated in my earlier-emailed credit
worksheets (FYI==> ), the following should be added as additional termination
events:

1  The Manager ceases to be either Joseph Kleinman or Simon Glover and an
alternate Manager acceptable to Party A has not assumed the responsibilities
of Manager.

2  In the event there exists one Manager, if the Manager resigns, is
terminated, or is otherwise incapacitated for a period exceeding one month.
In the event there exists more than one Manager, if for a coincident period
of one month, all of the Managers have resigned, been terminated, or have
otherwise been incapacitated.

Add the following definition:
 "Manager" means any person(s) with ultimate authority to direct the
investments of Party B, currently Joseph Kleinman and Simon Glover.

Replace Independent Amount definition with our new hedge fund standard.  It
is extracted from Union Spring as follows (But change the Independent Amount
to be each of the two counterparty's pro rata share of $50,000; The pro rata
distribution should be based on the allocation of the trade volumes):

(A)  &Independent Amount8 means with respect to Party A, the amount specified
as such for Party A in each Confirmation, or if no amount is specified, zero
and means with respect to Party B the amount specified as such for Party B
which may be either increased or decreased from time to time in a
Confirmation, which amount as modified shall be the Independent Amount
applicable for all outstanding Transactions, provided, however, that in no
event shall Party B,s Independent Amount be less than $100,000 if there are
any outstanding Transactions.

Add as an additional termination event and Material Adverse Change for Enron
the following:

(ii) The following will constitute an Additional Termination Event with
respect to Party A:

Party A,s Credit Support Provider,s credit rating is below BBB- by S&P, or if
it has no credit rating from S&P, Party A,s Credit Support Provider,s credit
rating is below Baa3 by Moody,s, or Party A,s Credit Support Provider fails
to have a rating from either S&P or Moody,s.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks44.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


I've been working too late to go out on a date this week, so we decided to
go out next week

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture--Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

            Matthew.Lenhart@enron.c
            om                             To:     IMCEANOTES-kevin+2Ea+2Eboone+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                           cc:
            06/08/2001 07:33 AM            Subject:     RE: bs

let's definately go next thurs.  i didn't hit it either b/c the hockey game
was on.  did you get a date for tonight?  i am going out with one of those
p.t.s.  let me know and maybe we can meet up.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   kevin.a.boone@accenture.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-kevin+2Ea+2Eboone+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Friday, June 08, 2001 7:13 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  bs

   whatup . . . did you go to Taco Milagro last nite . . . i didn't get out
   of
   the office until after 10, but i just talked to a buddy of mine who was
   at
   Downing Street next door and he said it was loaded up with hot ass . . .
   we
   need to hit that shit next thurs nite . . .

   Regards,

   Kevin A. Boone
   Accenture--Houston
   (Octel) 713.837.1638
   (Client) 281.848.1619
   (C) 713.306.7940
   (H) 713.864.4149
   Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

   Our web address is http://www.accenture.com


Rich - Dave and I were just discussing whether a period less than 12 months
would be appropriate (see language below), given that dereg. may bring some
changes we want to take advantage of.  It's basically your call:  if SPS were
to terminate our contract, how much time would we need to negotiate a
replacement?

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000
06:23 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 06:22 PM

To: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

What if we replace Section 2 with something like "This Agreement shall
continue in effect unless and until terminated pursuant to Section 3,"  and
replace Section 3 with "Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon
written notice to the other Party not less than twelve (12) months prior to
the intended date of termination."

Sound OK?  if so I'll add it to my draft.

David Foti
05/10/2000 06:20 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

Looks like you nailed the least cost billing provision pretty good.  Just
need to abrogate our remaining term and make all agreements evergreen.

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 05:45 PM

To: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

P.S. -- Dave, on your wish list you had included an evergreen provision.  See
Section 2 of the original contract, which gives TW the right to extend for
another five-year term by giving notice to SPS.  If TW does not give such
notice, SPS may cancel the contract, and if it doesn't, the contract
automatically rolls over for another year.  If this is not acceptable please
let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 05:41 PM

To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

Rich and Dave, attached are my suggested revisions to Mike McLeod's draft of
an amendment to the original electric service agreement.  Dave, I'll bring
you a copy of that agreement.  Rich, if Mike did not send you one, let me
know and I will fax it to you.

In my revisions, I've attempted to reflect the least cost billing you
described to me, using terminology I read in the tariff.  Please let me know
if it looks alright to you.  I'm available to discuss this whenever you are,
then I will make sending this to Mike top priority.  My sincerest apologies
for the delay; there has been more chaos around here than I am accustomed to
handling, and I appreciate your patience.

Susan
x30596


-----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Bradford, William S.
Subject: California Exposure - SCE/PGE

Per your request, please find the attached California Exposure File as of COB
04/18/01.  Please call with questions or comments.

WEndy


From Lorraine Cross/INGAA:

 <<Nomination>>

 - Ltr to Rae McQuade2-28-00.pdf


Were you thinking about presenting re: EnronOnline or attending to hear what
the others have to say?

	Mark E Haedicke
	06/14/2000 08:48 AM

		 To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Forum on Electronic Trading

FYI.  We should talk about attendance at these meetings re electronic trading.
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 08:45 AM -----

	George James <George.James@msdw.com>
	06/13/2000 03:58 PM
	Please respond to George.James

		 To: Rosemary Ryan <RRYAN@isda.org>
		 cc: ISDA BOARD <BOARD@isda.org>, Mary Cunningham <MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org>
		 Subject: Re: Forum on Electronic Trading

Rosemary,

Should we limit the presentations to ISDA members only?  What about
FPML/Swift/Londex or e speed, or treasury connect, etc?  I believe we should
try
to be inclusive of any important venture, member value from attendance goes up
as a result.

Regards,

George

Rosemary Ryan wrote:

>         Following up on the discussion at the Strategic Planning Session
> regarding ISDA holding a forum on electronic trading, we would like to
> suggest the following and welcome your input.
>
>         We propose to hold the forum in conjunction with the ISDA Member
> Updates in London (September 12), New York (September 20), Singapore
> (October 24) and Tokyo (October 26).
>
>         The agenda would be an update on ISDA committee activities from 9:00
> AM to 12:30 PM, luncheon at 12:30PM and the afternoon would be devoted to
> electronic trading.
>
>         The forum would include presentations from ISDA broker member firms
> who are involved in the electronic trading of OTC derivatives.
>
>         These firms would include:
>
> *       Blackbird
> *       Icor Brokerage
> *       Credittrade
> *       Creditex
> *       EBS
> *       Swapswire (assuming they are joining)
> *       Garban Intercapital
> *       Prebon Yamane
> *       Tullet & Tokyo Liberty
>
>         We would ask the institutions to pay a sponsor fee which would
> include a 20 minute presentation by each firm and would also allow them to
> distribute their marketing materials if they wish.  Following the
> presentations we would allow for Q&A.
>
>         If a firm chooses to present in one location we would charge $2,000,
> two locations $3,500, three locations $5,000 or four locations $5,500.
>
>         Please let us know if you have any comments or suggestions.
>
>         Thank you.


I have also assumed we take everyone in the Calgary and Portland offices - so I've missed them off the list.  I've got names if you need them.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Sunday, November 04, 2001 7:06 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie; Lavorato, John
Subject:	Support Services for ENA

So here's how it works.  The attached spreadsheet has three MASTER worksheets:

(i)  Energy  Operations
(ii) IT
(iii) Support Services

All the rest of the worksheets are back up documentation for the rankings.

Please identify the people on the Masters who actually have contracts.

Thanks

Louise
 << File: Swapcosupportpeople.xls >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Norman
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Dahlke, Andrea
Cc:	Yang, Zhiyun
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy Port-Calc

Dear All,

	There is a new PortCalc PRODFIX ( v4.2.2.1 ) which can handle the Bankruptcy Portfolios, please use that one instead. ( The Stage one has some performance problems to be resolved.)

	/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.new

	Sorry for the inconveniences.

	Regards,

Norman.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Norman
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Dahlke, Andrea
Cc:	Yang, Zhiyun
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy Port-Calc

Dear All,

	The latest PortCalc executable ( v4.2.3s1 ) is placed in :

	/stage/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr

	This version can evaluate the Bankruptcy Portfolios.

	Please let us know if there is any problems.

	Regards,

Norman.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Sunday, December 09, 2001 4:40 PM
To:	Lee, Norman; Yang, Zhiyun
Cc:	Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Dahlke, Andrea
Subject:	Bankruptcy Port-Calc

Can you please work on attaching the portcalc code to the Bankruptcy Portfolios first thing Monday morning.  Please reply to this e-mail when it is complete so we can begin testing the transactions we moved.

Thanks,
Stacey

P.S.  Zhiyun, Thank you so much for the option data.

Stacey


Who controls, developes and designs the activeX control?  If the control is developed in housen the component should follow and proper review/release process and then signed for production.  If this control is developed by an outside source, what is the functionality of the object?  what processes where taken to ensure the assurance of "fair-play" from a security risk evaluation point on this version and all potention upgrade versions?  And what relationship do we have with them to inquire about a signed version of their component?

Sorry for the incovienence of these queries, and I am sorry that these questions have to come from a desktop architect.  But to maintain tight security to ensure the stability for Enrons network, I think that these are important issues.

From Mark Hall's Blackberry

-----Original Message-----
From: Richey, Cooper <Cooper.Richey@ENRON.com>
To: Hall, Mark <Mark.Hall@ENRON.com>
CC: Qavi, Faheem <Faheem.Qavi@ENRON.com>; Dietrich, Dan <Dan.Dietrich@ENRON.com>
Sent: Fri Nov 02 16:58:08 2001
Subject: RE: albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

		What is the particulars of the reasoning behind needing the site to be listed as Trusted?
		TO FACILITATE POWER AND GAS TRADERS' ACCESS TO WEB-BASED DECISION
		SUPPORT TOOLS.

		What functionality is missing or broken because it is only listed as a intranet site?
		ACCESS DATA SOURCES FROM OTHER DOMAINS

		What option in the configuration of Trusted sites facilitates the functionality that is broken or missing?
		(1) DOWNLOAD UNSIGNED ACTIVE-X CONTROLS

		are these answers satisfactory? if not, please let me know what else I can possibly do
		to get this done.

		Cooper

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Hall, Mark
	Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 3:34 PM
	To:	Richey, Cooper
	Cc:	Qavi, Faheem; Dietrich, Dan
	Subject:	RE: albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

	Here are few question that I think should be asked before the approval of this change be granted:
		What is the particulars of the reasoning behind needing the site to be listed as Trusted?
		What functionality is missing or broken because it is only listed as a intranet site?
		What option in the configuration of Trusted sites facilitates the functionality that is broken or missing?

	Please remit answer at your earliest convience.

	Mark Hall
	Desktop Architecture

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Qavi, Faheem
		Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:11 AM
		To:	Hall, Mark
		Subject:	FW: albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

		Mark,

			Will this suffice or do you need more?  Thanks.

		Faheem A. Qavi
		Enron Net Works
		IT Security & Controls
		* Faheem.Qavi@Enron.Com
		*  (713) 345-8338

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Richey, Cooper
		Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:09 AM
		To:	Qavi, Faheem
		Subject:	albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

		please add "http://albertapower.enron.com" to the trusted sites list to facilitate power and gas traders' access to web-based decision 	support tools.

		let me know if there are other questions/issues

		Cooper Richey
		403 974 6946


Daren,

We are not receiving timely information from the Hub regarding our Park and Lend Agreement.  I have not received an update since Tues or Wed of last week.   Mike has been phoning them furiously for information and has been told that they don't have it, or it will be ready later.  Per GISB, final scheduled numbers on EPNG, NNG, and TW are reported at 9:00 am the following day (ie. Sunday final will be out at 9 AM on Mon.).  Prior to the transition from PG&E, we received our balance by 9:15 or 9:30 AM.  I realize that the transition has been difficult, they are never a cake walk, however, this type of information is crucial.  Further, they have not provided any final numbers for the month of April, we should at least be able to receive a "best available" number, and the Interstate Pipes, due to GISB, have final scheduled numbers available on the first of the month.  I submit that ENA should not be held liable for payment of the $0.03/day rate, as we have not received the information we need to balance the agreement.  If EPGT plans to administer fees, then balance information should be communicated on a timely basis.  We may want to check the terms of the agreement, and/or negotiate a reduced rate for the month of May.

Thank you,

Mary


This has a lot of hair on it.  I'll take it.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/08/99 12:55
PM ---------------------------

Tanya Rohauer
09/08/99 10:27 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: KPM Lasara L.P.

Attached is the credit worksheet that we discussed yesterday for the KPM
deal.  Draft should go to Dick Robinson. He is quite eager to get the draft
in front of the customer. Let me know if you have addtional questions.

Thanks,
Tanya


For our argument that the market is responding to expected new supplies.

----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 06/15/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Jeffrey Oh/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/15/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Gen Report

Jeffrey Oh
Enron North America   503.464.7789
West Power Desk    503.708.1760 (c)
121 SW Salmon Street 3WTC0306  503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, Oregon 97204   jeffrey.oh@enron.com


have you partying this week already with Shawn?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lenhart, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Gillette, Lisa
Subject: Re: Tomorrow...

that was a mistake.  i don't know what i was thinking.  i need to stay home.


Ben:

I am not aware of any IURC reporting requirements we are having to comply
with.

Ross, Chris - any comments.

Gus

	Benjamin Rogers@ECT
	10/31/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Wheatland Information Needed

Gus:
Are you able to assistance me in answering #2.  I have already received
Dave's comments.  Thanks
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 11:29 AM
---------------------------
Eric Bass   03/08/2001 11:21 AM

To: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner on Friday?

anthonys sounds good to me - 7 it is

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 03/08/2001 10:34:35 AM
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner on Friday?

Good morning. Looks like Mother will be in town this weekend. So, dinner
Friday @ 7 is fine with us if you are still available. If so, lets try
something different. How about Anthony's, Baroque, Brownstone or River Oaks
Grill? Your choice. Dutch treat. Let me know and I will get
reservations.-Dad

----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: Dinner on Friday?

>
> 7:00 preferably
>
>
>
>
> "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 03/07/2001 10:58:45 AM
>
> To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Dinner on Friday?
>
>
> What time you have in mind, Son?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:56 AM
> Subject: Dinner on Friday?
>
>
> > Hey Dad,
> >
> > Did you talk to the better half?  I was thinking Trulucks but if you
> can't
> > attend I understand.
> >
> > Let me know,
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
>
>
>
>


<<NDA-PVM Oil  Associates Limited>> Your message

  To:      dhufton@pvm.co.uk
  Cc:      Bob.Shults@enron.com
  Subject: NDA-PVM Oil  Associates Limited
  Sent:    Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:26:56 -0000

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Hufton, David on Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:23:22 -0000

Message-ID: <OFFA50BA72.757B61BA-ON862569AE.000227B5@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: dhufton@pvm.co.uk
Cc: Bob.Shults@enron.com
Subject: NDA-PVM Oil  Associates Limited
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:26:56 -0000
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


You are receiving a copy of the GE Appliances email
newsletter because you are a valued customer of GE
Appliances and provided us with your e-mail address. If you
are receiving this message in error or would prefer not to
receive future e-mails from us, please click on the link
below to set your privacy preferences
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=cd-VHVSQzsUFTB1v4Et8-4_AqcR

-------------------------------------------------
In this edition, you'll find:
-------------------------------------------------
-$100 Rebate on GE Profile? Dishwashers
-20% Discount on GE Faucet Mount Water Filtration System
-A Chance to Enter the GE Ultimate Kitchen Sweepstakes
-Menu Ideas, Tips and Recipes from Pillsbury
-Advantium Speedcook Recipe for Apricot Almond Scones
-How to Donate Your Used Appliances
-Free CD ROM Software Offer, and More.....

-------------------------------------------------
Save $100 on GE Profile? Dishwashers through January 26,
2002
-------------------------------------------------
The highest performance dishwashers you can buy--guaranteed!
Featuring a 30-day, money-back guarantee. For more
information on GE Profile Triton dishwashers, please visit
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=e2-J1opQhyP69J6nKOJ-HoZIyPR

REBATE FORM: GE Profile Dishwashers
*****************************************************
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=f7-N0CnQLgPmYfTrWoaQuOGbs9R

-------------------------------------------------
ALL GE REBATES: Look Here for All GE Rebates
-------------------------------------------------
$200 rebates on GE Profile Advantium? ovens, up to $125 on
eligible GE refrigerators and combo cooking offers that can
ad up to $450 in savings. To view all current GE rebates,
please visit
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=0c-_YGDIc8VF7Jr0afnk2e2RScR

Research, compare & buy rebated appliances here
***********************************************
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=21-UPrOIjdhyulwaf-kr5SorLlR

-------------------------------------------------
We'd Like Your Help...
-------------------------------------------------
If you cook, we'd like your opinion so that we can build
cooking products that better meet your needs. Take a quick
survey at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=36-wg8-IiIAmXB8oE_ZH7B3809R

-------------------------------------------------
Special Offer! Save 20% on GE SmartWater Faucet Mount
Filtration System
-------------------------------------------------
Regular price: $39.95.....Sale Price: $31.96* The GE
SmartWater faucet mount filtration system eliminates up to
99% of lead in drinking water. Look for Part No. GXFM03C
under " Water Systems" . Use Promo code XMS12 to get your
20% discount. Buy it online at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=4b-k_97IBUzWWMbTsT0t0-39uiR

*Price does not include sales tax and shipping costs.
Discount valid through January 10, 2002.

-------------------------------------------------
GE Ultimate Kitchen Sweepstakes
-------------------------------------------------
Now through 1/9/2002, purchase a GE appliance online from
GEAppliances.com, and you're entered to win $3,500 in
appliances from GE. Shop & get entered at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=60-oqEtIsE4hThXJYKK-1Y_oJnR

-------------------------------------------------
Having a Bunch for a Holiday Brunch? Or a Dozen for Dinner?
-------------------------------------------------
Get menu ideas, tips and recipes from Pillsbury at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=75-whftIKU4zFYS82I4Q2ZpOguR

-------------------------------------------------
Advantium Speedcook Recipes for Apricot Almond Scones
-------------------------------------------------
Advantium owners, will love this speedcook recipe! It's
easy, fast & delicious! Cooks in 5-7 minutes! Get the
complete Advantium recipe at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=8a-3yGdQXnL4BbAJEoxA3C-vG4R

-------------------------------------------------
Appliance Questions? The GE Answer Center Has a Solution
-------------------------------------------------
Whether you want to solve it yourself with our
trouble-shooting wizard or Ask Our Team of Experts? for
advice, you'll find answers online at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=9f-o76MQ1JLEHP580Hj_Fbhk5cR

-------------------------------------------------
Donate Your Used Appliances and Help Others
-------------------------------------------------
One person's trash is another person's treasure! Many
charities provide a pick-up service and you may be eligible
for a tax deduction.
Learn more at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=b4-aJ9bQ6Z9HG4sfAY-KgKxyhZR

-------------------------------------------------
Get Free CD-ROM Software*
-------------------------------------------------
Choose from titles like Williams-Sonoma Guide to Good
Cooking? and Compton's 3D World Atlas? Deluxe. Shop for
software at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=c9-3OnLQpguZBmf4_7YOVYxbleR

*Shipping & handling charges apply

-------------------------------------------------
Most Commonly Used Services on www.GEAppliances.com
-------------------------------------------------
Research, compare & buy appliances online
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=df-1kphQLESx2_3EsHyY_5-nXcR

Register your appliances
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=f4-Y-6EQ0suS-04lb7wZkqQI9ZR

Purchase extended warranties
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=09-joHSIj8RskroY9vKbYY7BtnR

Download catalogs or trouble shoot appliance problems
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=1e-JQyLI4jIx957Rwy-LdH8W2cR

Schedule service online
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=33-vUqnINjbJopsgXYBintlhDlR

-------------------------------------------------
The Last Word.......
-------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes it is a great joy just to listen to someone we
love talking." - Vincent McNabb

-------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to Email List
-------------------------------------------------
If you were forwarded this e-Newsletter and would like to
receive your own copy of the GE Appliances Insider, simply
click on the link below to subscribe.
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=48-gg4bIdBmVs_7DBWR_QJjlFeR

-------------------------------------------------
Remove Name from Email List
-------------------------------------------------
We respect your privacy. If you'd prefer not to receive
future e-mails from GE Appliances or our partners, please
set your privacy preferences at
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=5d-JNYbIK0m8sxFwCEkY7um9iRR

-------------------------------------------------
Contact Us
-------------------------------------------------
Please do not respond to this eNewsletter. For the fastest
response to your question or comment, please visit
http://appliancekiosk.geappliances.com/NASApp/ClickThru/ClickThru?q=72-R8dHIPUOno9Rqvf67wCN-oZR

-------------------------------------------------
Note to Readers
-------------------------------------------------
The links in this e-Newsletter refer to web pages on the
www.geappliances.com Internet site.  Your PC must have
Internet access for the links to function.

                       ####

Arctica, Spacemaker, Triton, SmartWater, Advantium, Profile,
Profile Performance, Monogram, Hotpoint, RCA and GE are
trademarks of General Electric Company.

Pillsbury is a registered trademark of The Pillsbury
Company.

Copyright ? 2001 General Electric Company

Volume 14.2


What about the access to the 50,000/d of new capacity at Needles that was being constructed? Wasn't that part of this proceeding? SoCal had argued that it would go to TW (we needed it for Red Rock).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Porter, J. Gregory; Rapp, Bill; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	SoCal Unbundling

At yesterdays CPUC meeting the Commission approved on a 3-2 vote the Comprehensive Settlement we supported to unbundle the SoCal system.  This includes open access to their backbone system and receipt point procedures we supported.  I'll distribute the final order as soon as its available with the effective dates and details.  gh


Jennifer:

Our records indicate that a draft was delivered to you earlier this week.  If
you do not have it, please let Marie Heard (x33907) know and she can get you
another copy.

Mark

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jennifer Sabine                           01/07/99 09:22 AM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Master Swap Agreement for HL&P

Mark,
Have you had a chance yet to prepare a Master Swap Agreement yet for HL&P?  I
would really like to start the ball rolling with the customer and get them a
copy to start going through.  Please let me know the status.

Thanks,
Jennifer

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Sabine/HOU/ECT on 01/07/99 09:20
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl                           12/16/98 05:09 PM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Sabine/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Master Swap Agreement for HL&P

Mark, Please forward the Master Swap Agreement to Jennifer Sabine for her
further handling with her counterparty at HL&P.  Thank you.


Notice # 01-150
May 4, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Amendments to NYMEX End of Week Post-Close Trading Session Rule

DATE:
May 4, 2001
===========================================================

Please be advised that beginning on Friday, May 11, 2001, a number of changes
to the NYMEX End of Week post-close trading session rule that were recently
approved by the Board will become effective.

Specifically, beginning on Friday, May 11, 2001 and continuing for subsequent
Friday post-close sessions (and post-close sessions the day before a mid-week
Exchange holiday) the following changes will be in effect:

(1) Contract months eligible for trading in these sessions will be expanded
from the first four to the first 12 consecutive listed contract months.

(2) The sessions will be 5 minutes in duration.

(3) The trading range for these sessions will be expanded by adding the
following ticks above (below) the
daily high (low) for the applicable contract month (provided that this
expanded trading range does not violate the maximum permissible price
fluctuation limits then in effect):

Crude Oil  20 ticks
Heating Oil   50 ticks
Unleaded Gas   50 ticks
Natural Gas  50 ticks

If you have any questions concerning these changes, please contact George
Henderson, Vice President, NYMEX Floor Department, at (212) 299-2071; Rob
Stasi, Manager of Trading Floor Systems, NYMEX Floor Department, at (212)
299-2067, or Brian Regan, Senior Associate General Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 6.57(&POST-CLOSE TRADING SESSION8) AND
NYMEX RULE 6.57A (&END OF WEEK TRADING SESSION8)

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 6.57A.  END OF WEEK TRADING SESSION

On the last trading day of the calendar week, and, in any week when an
Exchange holiday falls on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday on the trading day
preceding such midweek Exchange holiday, there shall be no post-close trading
session provided on the trading floor pursuant to Rule 6.57.  Instead, on
such dates, an end of week trading session (the &End of Week Session'') shall
commence on the trading floor pursuant to this rule and subsequent to the
close.  Except as otherwise provided by the President or the President,s
designee for a particular trade date, such End of Week Session shall commence
twenty (20) minutes after the close of trading in all futures contracts and
shall continue for a period of [ten (10)]  * five
 (5) * minutes in all energy and metals futures contracts, subject to the
following conditions:

(A) Trading during the End of Week Session shall be limited to the first
[four] * twelve * listed delivery months;

(B) Trades occurring during the End of Week Session for a particular contract
month of a futures contract shall be executed openly and competitively at a
price within the daily trading range of the applicable contract month for
that futures contract * and as further expanded above the daily high and
below the daily low only for the contracts listed below provided however that
no such expanded trading range may exceed the price fluctuation limits in
effect for the applicable contract as of the end of the RTH session:

Contract    Additional Ticks

Crude Oil    20 ticks
Natural Gas    50 ticks
Unleaded Gasoline   50 ticks
Heating Oil    50 ticks *

(C) During the End of Week Session, Floor Members, Floor Brokers and their
customers may participate in the same manner as trading occurring during the
regular RTH session, except that any order submitted during the RTH session,
including but not limited to resting orders such as stop orders, limit orders
and good until cancelled (GTC) orders, will be deemed to have expired as of
the end of RTH for purposes of this End of Week Session.  Accordingly, in the
event that a market participant with such an expired order seeks to
participate in the End of Week Session, a new order must be submitted.

(D) Prices for trades executed during the End of Week Session shall  be
reported on public ticker services;

(E) Current market prices and trades executed during the End of Week Session
shall not be considered in determining any settlement price; and

(F) Floor Members executing trades during the End of Week Session shall mark
a line across their trading cards prior to the entry of an End of Week
Session trade.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-150)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.