FYI -

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Site Unseen at eCompany.com"
<siteunseen+318701.73687448.1@dailies.ecompany.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Site+20Unseen+20at+20eCompany+2Ecom+22+20+3Csiteunseen+2
B318701+2E73687448+2E1+40dailies+2Eecompany+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:52 AM
To: Jafry, Rahil
Subject: A Source for Web Law

****************** Newsletters at eCompany.com ******************
Today at eCompany - Sign up for e-mail delivery of the latest
eCompany.com headlines and stories.
http://www.ecompany.com/articles/web/newslettersub/
*****************************************************************

Site Unseen

A Source for Web Law

By Deirdre Lanning; http://www.ecompany.com/siteunseen

Keeping up to speed on the latest Internet copyright infringement
laws or antitrust developments can be difficult these days. For a
dose of legal information focused on the Internet and technology,
check out http://www.GigaLaw.com. The site is run by lawyers, most
of whom have a background in or practice intellectual property and
Internet law.

Along with frequent updates on ongoing fiascoes like Microsoft's
antitrust case and Napster's present copyright ordeal, the site
includes daily articles dealing with all aspects of Internet law.
From the homepage you can sign up for one of GigaLaw's free
newsletters or jump to its great law library. You can also voice
your opinion on questions like "Should the FBI be allowed to search
e-mail with its new Carnivore program?" by voting at the site's
frequent polls. And if you've found yourself on the opposite side
of the tracks and actually need a lawyer, keep an eye out for
GigaLaw's soon-to-be-available directory of technology lawyers.

For more information on technology and Internet-related law
information, try Jeffrey Kuester's http://www.KuesterLaw.com,
which includes links to some relevant government offices and the
text of actual cases, or http://www.FindLaw.com, for a
comprehensive, Yahoo-like Web directory of law.

*****************************************************************
Want to join the most exclusive email newsletter list from
eCompany, including photos, information, and a taste of the
upcoming issue before anyone else?  Join the eCompany Insider's
List - and get yourself in the know. To subscribe, send a blank
email to join-ecompany@lists.electricartists.com. If you have any
questions about the list or want to get more information first,
send an email to ecompany@electricartists.com and we'll get back to
you with details.
*****************************************************************

*****************************************************************
You are subscribed to 'Site Unseen' with the address:
rahil.jafry@enron.com.  If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply
to this message with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
If you would like to send feedback to the author, please send an
email to site_unseen@ecompany.com.
*****************************************************************


Phone with questions.  Co-ordinate with Carmel Burke (Fin Ops) if you still
wish to phone in for the meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve W Young/LON/ECT on 11/12/2000 18:48
---------------------------

Carmel Burke
06/12/2000 15:18
To: Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Duncan Webster/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: RAC final pack

Hi Steve,

I am attaching the final version of your 2001 plan so that you get a chance
to review it before our meeting on Monday.

The new pack reflects any changes that were discussed at our last meeting,
namely  a reduction in training courses to 2 per person and an increase in
economy versus business flights .

I have also revisited the 2000 forecast and adjusted where necessary to
reflect most recent running rates. I have  changed the 2000 headcount figures
to reflect November actuals and have assumed no new starters in December so
if this is inaccurate I will need to amend here.

You will need to view the "direct" and "rsc" sheets to see the information.

Let me know if you have any problems.

Many Thanks

Carmel


Mark:  Barbara Gray and Shonnie Daniel worked on a Q1 deal between Enron and
Texaco to create a JV called BL.  I believe that the ownership is 60/40,
respectively.  BL has its own employees drawn from both companies and
elsewhere but is still requiring additional services.  The swap group has
already opened two futures accounts for BL and drafted resolutions,
authorized trader lists, etc.  Before the closing, there was an
"understanding" that Enron would assist BL for a short time (until June,
2000).  However, credit (through Bill Bradford) negotiated a 3-year services
agreement for credit services to BL (I believe based upon 1 full-time person
run through an entire budget).  Randy Curry (BL's president) has requested
that legal (swaps group) consider a short-term services arrangement (I am
told by credit this would be for approx. 6-9 months; BL looking for approx.
20 ISDA's).  By the way, ENA is trying to negotiate an ISDA with BL but we
have no one to negotiate with!  BL has not yet hired an in-house lawyer.

Are you interested in pursuing this request?  Sara


Yes, please.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/18/2001 12:02 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, ccampbel@KSLAW.com
cc:

Subject: January 8 Letter Agreement with Original Signature of Sweetgum

Kay and Carolyn,

Ozzie Pagan just handed me a letter agreement with Sweetgum's original
signature on it.  It is the January 8 letter from ENA to Sweetgum with
enclosures of the final execution forms of the three (3) Facility Agreements
(Receipt acknowledged by Sweetgum).

Kay,  do you want me to send this to Carolyn?

Kathleen


did you see the debate last night?  i was impressed with cheney.  i thought
he was more impressive than either presidential candidate.


Amy,

Yes, I am interested. I am in London now, but I shall contact him on
Thuirsday.

Vince

Amy FitzPatrick
02/21/2000 03:34 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Vince -

Would you have any interest in this candidate?

Kind regards -
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT on 21/02/2000
09:34 ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
18/02/2000 19:50
To: Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

probably a bit to techy for me but maybe a good fit for Vince Kaminski in
Houston Research.

bs

Amy FitzPatrick
17/02/2000 12:52
To: David Port/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W
Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Any thoughts on this candidate?

Kind regards -
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT on 17/02/2000
12:52 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Simon Bragg <sb@michelangelo.co.uk>
17/02/2000 12:36

To: "'amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com'" <amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Hi Amy

A colleague of mine interviewed someone last week who is a PHD whose
background is as a developer within catastrophe risk management. He is
looking to move into more of a quantitative role which will utilise his
developing  skills and also his statistical and theoretical knowledge as
well. The issue is that he is based in Chicago and I wondered if there
would be any interest from your headquarters there.

Please find attached his details.

Speak to you soon.

Regards

Simon

 - D0075530.DOC


Attached is a draft template for the Schedule and Paragraph 13 of a ISDA
Master Agreement to be use by hedge funds.  The document has been reviewed by
Cadwalader and contains a significantly enlarged range of representations and
covenants of both the hedge fund and the investment manager.  I have not
included in this draft the concept of an investment manager letter which was
suggested by Cadwalader and which can be used when the investment manager
does not agree to be a party to the ISDA Master Agreement.   I would
appreciate it if each of you would take a look at the document and provide me
with any comments you have.  I am meeting with David Mitchell of Cadwalader
on Monday of next week.  I also plan to walk through the base document with
Caroline Abramo and the others in New York on Sunday so that they can better
understand why the ISDA for hedge funds is more complex than normal ISDAs.
Finally, I am also attaching a list that I have prepared of the major changes
that have been made to the standard ISDA to create the hedge fund template.
Thanks.

Frank


Mark,

Are you planning to hold tomorrow's regularly-scheduled SWAP meeting?

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Please see attached.  If you have any questions, please call Brenda
Flores-Cuellar at 713-853-1914 or Tom Gros at 713-853-5537.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greg Drillock <gdrillock@sempratrading.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Greg+20Drillock+20+3Cgdrillock+40sempratrading+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Solmonson, Mary
Cc: Gros, Thomas D.; Jeff Rosenzweig; Vincent Loud
Subject: RE: Dates/Times for Possible meeting to discuss back office autom
ation

Jeff and myself would like to come down for a visit next Wednesday, March
7th.
Could we schedule a meeting for 11am?

-----Original Message-----
From: Solmonson, Mary [mailto:Mary.Solmonson@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:19 PM
To: Greg Drillock (E-mail)
Cc: Gros, Thomas D.
Subject: Dates/Times for Possible meeting to discuss back office
automation

I enjoyed speaking with you last week.  As promised, below are proposed
times for a meeting in Houston to explore the opportunity we have to
offer in more detail.  I have also spoken with representatives in Enron
Online regarding your desire to receive a feed of deal data from EOL and
should have someone available to discuss potential solutions with you.

Here are some proposed dates/times to pick from.  Let me know what suits
your schedule best.  We're thinking we'll spend the first bit of time
giving you an overview of what we're working on and proposing and then
go from there.  We'll probably spend at most 2 hours in this first
meeting.

Wednesday 3/7    anytime between 10-5
Thursday     3/8  anytime between 8-12
Friday         3/9  anytime between 11-5

We would also enjoy the opportunity to treat you to lunch if scheduling
permits.  Let me know which day/time works best for you and I will
proceed with finalizing the schedule.

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Hello Greg--A belated congrats on the new post at Enron--We had, as you probably read, a sort of pool going about who would get tagged for the big desk-- Most of the emails we received offering their thoughts on the question seems to favor you--most were also fmr Enron traders and the like. I had to chuckle about the stories that ran about you in the past few weeks--you must be tired of the tanker reference by now. I seem to recall the last time we traded emails and calls was around the time you took over the wholesale group--most of the stories at that time were equally clever--"he should know about volitility, he used to drive a tank in germany...blah blah blah. Anyhow, hope all is well chief, would like to do an interview at some point, for either The Desk or The Risk Desk. Your call. By the way, who is the nominal head of the bandwidth desk these days--hawthorne?
best,
John

John Sodergreen
Publisher and Editor-in-Chief
Scudder Publishing Group, LLC
ph: 410/923-0688
fax: 410/923-0667
johns@scudderpublishing.com
The Desk, The Risk Desk, Power Executive
The Bandwidth Desk, Energy eBusiness


We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


Start Date: 12/23/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122307.txt


Jeff:

Here is the Supplement document you need to sign and send back to us.
(See attached file: Derivative Clearing Supplement.pdf)

The fee structure is as follows:

WTI Bullet Swap:

LCH Fee:       $0.12 per lot
ICE Execution Fee:  $2.50 per lot
CFI Clearing Fee:   same as your NYMEX rate with us ($1.35 per lot)

Natural Gas Swap LDI

LCH Fee:       $0.03 per lot
ICE Execution Fee:  $0.625 per lot
CFI Clearing Fee:   $0.32 per lot **

** Fee are proportionate to the size of the contract (7.5 X NYMEX)
Execution  0.625 X 30 days/ 7.50 = $2.50

If you have any questions please call me at 212-841-3366
Best Regards
Lou Caiafa

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Dave, I wanted to let you know that I will be in Israel on July 28, on the
date of the VP pre-ranking.  This is a long scheduled family trip that would
be difficult to cancel.  I can call in or get all my comments to you and
others ahead of time.      Mark


This is fine,  many thanks again to you and everyone for your help!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I will forward it on and see what I can do, we really like kids straight out
of school...they are green and uncorrupted by the working world..Plus we can
work them like dogs.
PL


Susan,

Deal # 360695 has been created and entered in Sitara.

Bob

SUSAN
SMITH
08/10/2000 12:23 PM

To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tri-C-Governer Bill Daniels #1

Bob:

 Please create and enter a ticket into Sitara based on the following:

 Counterparty   Meter   Period-Volumes  Price
 Cokinos Natural Gas Co. 9842   8-1/8-30 -   First 5000/day is 96%, over 5000
day is 97%
        7328 MMbtu/d

 This is a Producer Services deal and should be tracked in the IM wellhead
portfolio, attached to the gathering contract.

 Thank You,

  Susan
  x 33321


/-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\
12 CDs for FREE (plus s&h)!  What are you waiting for? This great
deal alone should be music to your ears. With so many titles to
choose from, you?re bound to find some essential titles you just
can't live without! Click for more details.
http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/27986/165550/165550

<a href="http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/27986/165550/165550">
AOL users click here </a>
\-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-/

   Word of the Day for Monday April 1, 2002:

   lachrymose \LAK-ruh-mohs\, adjective:
   1. Given to shedding tears; suffused with tears; tearful.
   2. Causing or tending to cause tears.

     At  the farewell party on the boat, Joyce was surrounded by
     a lachrymose family.
     --Edna  O'Brien,  "She  Was the Other Ireland," [1]New York
     Times, June 19, 1988

     I  promise  to do my best, and if at any time my resolution
     lapses,  pen  me a few fierce vitriolic words and you shall
     receive  by  the next post a lachrymose & abject apology in
     my most emotional hand writing.
     --Rupert Brooke, letter to James Strachey, July 7, 1905

     The  game is perpetuated by the sons in a sometimes vicious
     sibling  rivalry  that  inevitably subsides into lachrymose
     reconciliation.
     --Arthur Gelb and Barbara Gelb, [2]O'Neill: Life With Monte
     Cristo

     Meanwhile,  a  lachrymose  new  waltz,  "After  The Ball Is
     Over," was sweeping the nation.
     --Benjamin   Welles,   [3]Sumner   Welles:   FDR's   Global
     Strategist
     _________________________________________________________

   Lachrymose is from Latin lacrimosus, from lacrima, "tear."

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/
   2. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0399146091/ref%3Dnosim/lexico
   3. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312174403/ref%3Dnosim/lexico

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000 05:56
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/01/2000 04:16 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Cal ISO

Enron: Withdrawing 300 MW From Summer Peaking Program
Wednesday, November 1, 2000 02:18 PM

	?Mail this article to a friend

	(Corrected 1:59 pm)

	NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--In response to new California power market rules
proposed Wednesday by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Enron
Corp (ENE, news, msgs) has canceled some new generator projects it was
discussing with the state's electric grid operator, Enron said.
	The generators that are no longer financially feasible would have amounted to
300 megawatts of new generation installed in California next spring, Enron
said. The company, however, continues to negotiate other new generator
projects with the California Independent System Operator.
	The FERC Wednesday proposed limiting the California Power Exchange's price
setting mechanism to $150 a megawatt-hour. The preliminary order could become
a federal mandate by the end of the year, after the FERC takes comments from
the public, or it could be modified.
	Enron and 13 other companies, meanwhile, are in final negotiations with the
ISO for the new peaking capacity for next summer. The ISO plans to pay a
total of $255 million a year for three years to the power companies for
installing the new generators, which the power companies will own.
	In addition, California's three investor-owned utilities would pay the
generators for any electricity the new generators produce. Pricing for the
power would likely be based on the daily price set by the state-chartered
CalPX.
	"There's too much uncertainty that we would be able to recover the cost
associated with those specific projects. For the purposes of making capital
commitments, we view this as a $150 price cap," Enron's Mark Palmer said.
	Earlier Wednesday, the ISO's chief operating officer, Terry Winter, expressed
concern that FERC's proposed new rules could jeopardize some of the projects.
	FERC's proposals Wednesday are the result of a two-month investigation of
California's wholesale electricity market, where prices this summer were
three times what they were a year earlier. To meet the state's rising demand
for power, California's three utilities have paid billions of dollars more
than anticipated to independent power producers in order to keep the lights
on.
	By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com
	Quote for referenced ticker symbols: EIX, ENE, PCG, SRE

	, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with
Glynn:

Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing
included a list of top twenty creditors.  Our negative CTC claim was
apparently not taken into account in compiling that list.  The list is
nonbinding, however.  PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on
April 20.  Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured
claims).  You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and
state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as
uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the
claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the
court determines the validity of the claim).
Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee:  PG&E may have the opportunity
to influence representation on the creditors' committees.  There are several
reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2)
we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the
real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as
significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers
... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on
the creditors committee anyway).


I talked to the boys and we are going to go out on Friday night. We were
thinking of going to earl's and then hitting the town.

What do you think?

Chris

(PS How is your day going?)


your running backs suck - what do you want for harrison?

rb and wr (carter)


The following key Second Extraordinary Session Assembly bills were just
introduced.  Additional bills were introduced to deal primarily with
items such as outage schedules and notification protocols as well as
consumer tax credits.

ABX2 1 (Cardoza) - This bill would permit irrigation districts to
purchase gas from public agencies and permit irrigation districts to
explore for gas.  This is identical to ABX1 39.

ABX2 2 (Corbett) - This would establish as windfall profits tax.  This
is identical to ABX1 128.

ABX2 7 (Simitian) - This would establish a formula for standby charges
for QFs.  This is identical to ABX1 108.

ABX2 9 (Migden) - This would permit local governments to aggregate
provided that IOUs provide metering and billing services.  This is
identical to ABX1 48.

ABX2 10 (Hertzberg) - This would require, as a condition of receiving a
permit from the CEC, that a generator enter into a contract with DWR or
a municipal utility.  This is identical to ABX1 60.

ABX2 11 (Wright) - This would permit governmental entities currently
served by SCE and LADWP to be served only by LADWP.  This is identical
to ABX1 54.

ABX2 14 (Canciamilla) - This bill would permit entities to sell gas
in-state without being classified as a public utility and would allow
for the sale of low grade gas.  This is identical to ABX1 73.


Vasant,

I shall take 2 thin  mints and one apple cinnamon.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue
01/17/2001 03:20 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh
Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Praveen
Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo
Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, George
Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blesie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Milind Pasad/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Best/NA/Enron, Travis Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cliff Shedd/NA/Enron@Enron, Rafi Khan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Banu Ozcan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mauricio Mora/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Anyone for Girl Scout Cookies?

I have been drafted by my daughter again this year to check if anybody here
would like any (at $3 per box).
If you do, send me an email.
Choices are Shortbread, Coconut, Thin mints, Peanut butter creme, Peanut
butter with chocolate, lemon drops, nut and fudge, apple cinnamon.
Deliveries in late February to early March.

Thanks,
Vasant


Hi Sara,
Pursuant to my voicemail, there are just a few things that I would like to
discuss, let me know when a good time is.  Thanks,
Dee

Delene M. Travella
Vice President
Capital Markets, Derivatives
Telephone: (704) 383-8778
Facsimile: (704) 383-0575
email: delene.travella@funb.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:47 PM
> To: delene.travella@funb.com
> Subject: ISDA w/ First Union National Bank
>
> Dee:  Let me know if we need to discuss anything.  I am hopeful that we
> are
> ready to prepare execution copies.  Regards.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com
> ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 11:45 AM -----
>
>
>                     Susan Bailey
>
>                                          To:
> <delene.travella@funb.com>
>                     02/27/2001           cc:     Sara
> Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate
>                     08:23 AM             Subject:     ISDA w/ First Union
> National Bank
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dee,
>
> Attached for your review is a blacklined version of the: (a) Schedule and
> (b) Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Master Agreement.   These have been compared
> against the draft dated 11/8/2000, and include ENA's accepted changes per
> your (a) faxed comments transmitted to ENA on January 5, 2001, and  (b)
> e-mail comments transmitted to ENA on January 19th, 2001.
>
> We look forward to your response.
>
> (See attached file: 163actr(ena-firstunion).doc)
>
> Cordially,
> Susan S. Bailey
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
> Houston, Texas 77002
> Phone: (713) 853-4737
> Fax: (713) 646-3490
> E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com << File: 163actr(ena-firstunion).doc >>


The second phase of reconstruction on IH 45 between W. Dallas and Memorial
will begin Saturday, November 11, 2000, all northbound lanes will be closed
at 7 PM.  All northbound traffic will detour to US 59 North to IH-610 Loop.
Two northbound lanes will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000, at 5 AM.

  The Houston Avenue / Memorial Avenue exit and the entrance from Pease,
  St. Joseph's Parkway, and Walker  will be closed until further notice.
Anyone
  typically using these routes must find an alternate route.

The following routes are recommended by the Texas Department of Transportation

New Ramp Chartres at Runnels to IH 10 West

Louisiana North to IH 10 West on ramp

Allen Parkway to Studemont or Waugh to IH 10

West Gray to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

Bagby (W. Dallas) to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

San Jacinto to IH 10 East

North on main to IH 45

Travis to IH 45

The Downtown District is updating it's web site with detailed road closure
maps and suggested alternate routes.  This information is available at
http://www.downtownstreets.com. Please check this site regularly for updates
on street closures.


please take a look at their comments regarding credit sections.  i belive i
know your response.

thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 05:32 PM -----

	Kathy_Gerken@cargill.com
	02/15/2001 02:57 PM

		 To: debra.perlingiere@enron.com, Kathy_Gerken@cargill.com,
Marc_Rubenstein@cargill.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron - Cargill Master Agreement

Please see attached file with edits indicated.

Kathy Gerken
Natural Gas Contract Administrator
952-984-3220

-----Original Message-----
From: Rubenstein, Marc /hdqt
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Gerken, Kathy /hdqt
Subject: Enron - Cargill Master Agreement

Can yo get this to her today (cc. me)

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [mailto:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:05 AM
To: rubenstein, marc /hdqt
Subject: Master Agreement

Marc,

Thank you for your e-mail concerning the Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement,  kindly forward your comments to my attention by e-mail or
fax
(see # below) and I will review same.  on an expedited basis.

Thank you for your attention to the foregoing.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

 - enroneditsmp.doc


thats nice honey. great day, made it all back

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Parks, Kim" <PARKS_KIM@da.co.harris.tx.us>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Parks+2C+20Kim+22+20+3CPARKS+5FKIM+40da+2Eco+2Eharris+2Etx+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:

I think I just topped your keys in the gutter story.  I just accidentally
flushed my pager down the toilet.


Jeff,

Judy Lay Allen, an associate of yours on the Federal Reserve board, spoke with Joannie Williamson today regarding my desire to interview at Enron.

I am a graduate of Princeton University with two years experience in financial modeling and communications.   Towards assessing my skill set relative to peers, I took and received a 740 on my GMAT.  I have also interned in a gas exploration company and am familiar with the industry; likewise, I have worked with clients in telecommunications and am aware of the work Enron is doing in the bandwidth trading/pooling field.

I am aware of Enron's executive training/business analyst programs and am highly interested in exploring opportunities therein.  I am in Houston through Friday evening and, given the short notice, would be grateful for any opportunity to meet with the appropriate person any time Thursday or Friday.

I look forward to interviewing and applying my experience at Enron.

Best regards,
Michael Kuntz
917-838-6364

 - Resume (MK) 5-1-01.doc


I just want to make sure that all the angles are covered regarding this deal. I know you had mentioned that research signs off on the model, we need to make sure that the positions get picked up in VaR, this needs to get into RiskTrac. What else am I missing?

John

John Postlethwaite
EPMI-West Power Risk Management
503-464-7756


Look who we have deciding our election...

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20001117/ts/mdf131941.html


I bought the following gas today from Enron:

1. Nov 01 - Mar 02, 2500 MMBtu/day @ CG for $11.86
2. Jul 03 - Jun 04, 2500 MMBtu/day @ Malin for $5.05
3. Nov 03-Mar04, 1000 MMBtu/day @ Malin for $5.13

I'll update you on the status of reaching our hedging goals soon.

Raveen, I'll get you the paperwork once I get it from Enron.

Monica


Hi All,

As of today, MetaStock has several new functions. The most important new
feature is the ability to display forward HEAT RATE charts.
Also, notice that the interface looks different -- this reflects and
accommodates the new features. The help files (on the left of the applet)
fully describe and explain all the changes and additions to the program.

If you have any questions regarding this new version of MetaStock, please
contact Anna Santucci (x. 34225) for user questions or Mark Symms (x. 33105)
for technical questions. And, of course, you can ask these questions once you
log into the MegaWatt Station (the virtual one).


Margaret,

I shall invite Hunter Shiveley. I think it will cover ENA.

Vince

Margaret Carson@ENRON
11/02/2000 09:57 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting TUES

Vince  Do you  plan on  inviting  anyone  from the power  issues side
--perhaps Ben Jacoby, Julie Gomez, Jean Mrha, Scott Neal  to  this meeting?
Thanks  Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/02/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John Goodpasture                           11/01/2000 05:53 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting

Margaret Carson is going to join us in the meeting next week with Nesbitt.
Vince will check with ENA to see if they also want to attend.  I would also
like to determine if ETS and/or NBP would want to send a representative(s),
although Margaret said she would take copious notes for distribution to other
key players as necessary.  We should ask Nesbitt how he would structure a
deal for multiple clients (eg. ETS, NBP, ENA, and maybe El Paso).

[We need to remain aware of any "affiliate" issues that may result, and make
certain that we are in complete compliance with the regs.]

I will wait until after our meeting with Nesbitt before deciding if/how to
approach El Paso.  Presumably, if asked to particpate, they would share the
cost and have independent access to any working model that is developed.

JNG

---------------------- Forwarded by John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron on 11/01/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/30/2000 04:42 PM
To: John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dale Nesbitt

John,

I talked to Dale Nesbitt. He suggested that the best way to evaluate his
model is to
go through a one week intensive project with assistance of somebody from his
company.
Our cost  is a flat fee of $12,500 that would be deducted from the purchase
price of $55,000,
in case we buy the software package.

The price of 55K is indicative and will be adjusted based on the required
level of support.

Dale will be in Houston next week. I have tentatively invited him to visit
with us on Tuesday,
November 7, at 3:00 p.m. He will adjust if you are busy at this time.

Please, let me know what you think.

Vince


Summary of Davis/Alpert bill AB 260

Retro-active to June 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002, 6.5 cent/kWh cap on
the energy component for residential and small commercial customers (under
100 kW).  The Commission has the ability to extend through 2003.  The
Commission also has the ability to adjust the cap.

Commission can use revenues from utility-owned assets, refunds from FERC to
offset the undercollections.  (In addition, a companion bill was passed that
provides $150 million of general fund money to offset undercollections.)

Large commercial/industrial/agricultural customers have an opportunity to
"opt-in" to the 6.5 cent/kWh cap with an annual true-up.

SDG&E will under a prudence review by the CPUC, which may be another source
of funds to offset the undercollection.

Specific classes subject to cap:

  Schedule A, all acute care hospitals, all public and private k-12 schools,
all accounts on AL-TOU under 100 kW.

Attached a link to the bill
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_265_bill_20000830_enrol
led.pdf

Summary of the rate payer relief bill AB 1156 which would
Transfer of $150,000,000 from the general fund  to a subaccount within the
Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties.
Appropriate those funds from the subaccount, to the commission, to reduce the
adverse impact of high-cost wholesale energy purchases on certain ratepayers
if a specified rate ceiling is in effect, and if the commission determines
that a specified revenue shortfall would result in a ratepayer surcharge
greater than 10%, and the electricity rates were directly linked to Power
Exchange costs.
Declare that, on January 1, 2004, any remaining balance in the account would
revert to the General Fund.
Become operative only if AB 265 is enacted, as specified.
 Take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Attached a link to the bill
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1156_bill_20000830_enro
lled.pdf

AB 970 Siting Bill.

AB 970 passed last night. The final version has not been published yet. The
final version should only have an additional amendment relating to a Calpine
facility in San Jose for which expeditious treatment has not been granted. We
will produce a summary once the enrolled version is available, which should
be today or Tuesday at the latest. Bellow is the previous amended version of
the Sitting Bill.

Attached a link to bill as amended on 8/7/00

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0951-1000/ab_970_bill_20000807_amend
ed_sen.pdf.pdf


Thanks for your email.  I'll be out of the office for the rest of the week so
when you find an answer, just let Bonnie (37422) White know.  Thanks.
Elizabeth


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lawrence, Linda L.
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Linnell, Elizabeth; Nicolay, Christi; Scott, Susan
Subject: FERC RTO Orders, Part 2


PRELIMINARY EVENT REPORT
Southern California Seismic Network (TriNet) operated by Caltech and USGS

Version 1: This report supersedes any earlier reports about this event.
This is a computer generated solution and has not yet been reviewed by a
human.

Magnitude   :   4.2  Ml
Time        :    5 Apr 2002   00:02:55 AM PST
            :    5 Apr 2002   08:02:55 UTC
Coordinates :   34 deg. 31.20 min. N,  116 deg. 17.61 min. W
Depth       :     0.0 miles (  0.0 km)
Quality     :   Excellent
Event ID    :   9775765
Location    :     26 mi. N   of Joshua Tree, CA
            :     51 mi. NNE of Palm Springs, CA
            :     17 mi. SSE of HECTOR (quarry)
            :      0 mi. NNW of the Pisgah Fault

More information is available on the Worldwide Web at:
http://www.trinet.org/scsn/scsn.html

EDIS-04-05-02 0006 PST

(Special thanks to craigslist for helping get this to you quickly!)
---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.
Please DO NOT reply to this message: replies may be treated as
errors and result in your subscription being deleted.  If
you have trouble with the Web form, or for other queries, email
<edistrouble@incident.com>.  (But for faster service try the
Web method first!)

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay service is offered by
incident.com on a non-commercial, subscription-only basis.
Because of the complexity of this system and its dependence on
other systems, we cannot be responsible for delays or failures
in forwarding or transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


I'm forwarding ECT Canada's top 15 counterparties. We will use this list with
the exception of J. Aaron, BP Amoco, PG&E, Morgan Stanley and Bank of
Montreal as our target list for the USD/CAD products. Please ensure that a
GTC is drawn up to allow EOL trading of these currency products. I would like
to have the legal work done by March 6 in order to meet Gary's deadline.

David: I talked to Goldman today. They have developed a mechanism to feed
live rates from their website into Excel. They will be here in 2 weeks to do
a demo.

W.Stuart

---------------------- Forwarded by William Stuart/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Jason Garvey
02/13/2001 02:59 PM
To: William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: ISDA Agreements


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:04 AM
To:	Villarreal, Alex; Hogan, Irena D.; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Black, Tamara Jae; Rybarski, Amanda; Miller, Kevin; Roberts, Mike A.; Stevens, Adam; Marquez, Jose; Vickers, Frank; Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Bass, Eric; Baumbach, David; Bryan, Gary; Buss, Jd; Farmer, Daren J.; Larubbio, Morris; Martin, Thomas A.; Olsen, Michael; Redmond, Brian; Schwieger, Jim; Weldon, V. Charles
Subject:	Weather Class - on behalf of Kevin Moore

Wednesday , January 16th, 2002

Good morning All ,

The Research Weather Team will be presenting another Weather Class.

The Class will be conducted TODAY at 10:00 a.m. in room ECS-06980.

The Speaker/Teacher  will be Adam Stevens.

Please join us.......

Assistants : Please forward to your groups..

Everyone is invited.

                                                                       Thanks
                                                                    Kevin Moore


Thanks!
Ben


Please see attached file as solution to problems identified by Jim.

James D Steffes
08/16/2000 07:56 AM
To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Comments on Duque/ Wood Decisions -- Due TODAY 8/16

Bruno --

I completely disagree with this pleading.   Direct access customers should
not be afforded the same regulatory "bad policy" as bundled customers as
relates to their energy component.  If the regulatory fix was to reduce
distribution rates for the period, then I would seek that fix.

We, as Enron, have been loudly proclaiming that our direct access customers
have managed their price exposure by locking in with a contract and price
with us.  We took the price exposure for our customers and managed it
appropriately.

If other members of ARM are not hedging their short retail position than they
are just as "bad" as the utility.

This is not the message we want to be sending.  This pleading should say what
Bruno's change proposes, and then little more.  The competitive market looks
like  a bunch of "yahoos" for advocating markets and price volatility and
then asking for handouts!

Jim

Bruno Gaillard
08/15/2000 08:47 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Comments on Duque/ Wood Decisions -- Due TODAY 8/16

Attached is the first draft ARM's our comments. It will be revised, however
we need to get comments in ASAP

I asked Jeanne Bennett to change the third sentence in the introduction from
"ARM does not dispute the need to offer relief..." to a statement that would
reflect ARM's belief that the market will ultimately offer the best hedging
tools for all customers, However, ARM recognizes that there is an immediate
problem in SDG&E than can be mitigated on an interim basis with the Wood or
Duque proposal.

The paragraph will be redrafted to clarify the fact that we do not want the
levelized payment plan to be the default for any customer class and that the
LPP should be only offered to smaller customers on an optional basis as
larger customers are more sophisticated and can find these options in the
market.

If you have concerns, please provide comments by 11 am CST on 8/16 as the
filing is due on 8/16

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/15/2000
06:41 PM ---------------------------

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 08/15/2000 03:34:25 PM
To: "'ARM@Phaser.com'" <ARM@Phaser.com>
cc: "'jleslie@luce.com'" <jleslie@luce.com>, "'bluden@greenmountain.com'"
<bluden@greenmountain.com>
Subject: Comments on Duque/ Wood Decisions -- Privileged -- Attorney Work
Product

Attached is a draft of the comments on Wood's and Duques' proposed
decisions. It tracks our conversation of this morning.  As you all know,
these comments are  due tomorrow.  Please have all comments on the draft to
me by no later than noon tomorrow (the 16th).

 <<X15748.DOC>>

Jeanne

 - X15748.DOC


Attached please find the Agenda for the BSP Meeting that will be held on
Friday,
April 27, 2001.

(See attached file: BSP meeting agenda 4-27-2001.doc)

Thank you,
Denise
518-356-6184

Market Services
518-356-6060

 - BSP meeting agenda 4-27-2001.doc


Jeff, hopefully we can convince you to come when we re-schedule - seemed like
an easy call.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
03:59 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
12/06/2000 01:18 PM
Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: david.w.delainey@enron.com, lavorato@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,
derek.davies@enron.com, stephen.douglas@enron.com,
hunter.s.shively@enron.com, laura.luce@enron.com, michael.l.miller@enron.com,
thomas.a.martin@enron.com, john.zufferli@enron.com, Scott.tholan@enron.com,
wdavid.duran@enron.com, rob.milnthorpe@enron.com, c.john.thompson@enron.com,
scott.josey@enron.com, paul.devries@enron.com, scott.neal@enron.com,
jean.mrha@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com, mark.e.haedicke@enron.com,
joseph.deffner@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, beth.perlman@enron.com,
wes.colwell@enron.com, mike.swerzbin@enron.com, bruce.sukaly@enron.com,
doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, eric.ledain@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com,
rogers.herndon@enron.com, dana.davis@enron.com, jonathan.mckay@enron.com,
mark.frevert@enron.com, barry.tycholiz@enron.com, chris.h.foster@enron.com,
eric.thode@enron.com, brian.redmond@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com,
fletcher.sturm@enron.com, edward.baughman@enron.com, gwolfe@enron.com,
pallen@enron.com, flagrasta@enron.com, christopher.f.calger@enron.com,
frank.w.vickers@enron.com, jake.thomas@enron.com, jeff.donahue@enron.com,
jsteffes@enron.com, max.yzaguirre@enron.com, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando
Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Angela
McCulloch/CAL/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica
Butler/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paula Forsyth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Pikofsky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anabel Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Purswell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Tonai Lehr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lindsey Huculiak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Rios/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Gardner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra
Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect, Crystal
Blair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marianne M Arake/SA/Enron@Enron,
Luly Stephens/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: ENA 2000 Offsite

Given the current tremendous energy market volatility and as we stretch
resources to make our commercial goals for 2000, we think it would be
appropriate to postpone the ENA 2000 Offsite to early next year.  I trust
this meets with your approval and thanks for all the hard work.

Regards
Dave and John


Christie,

Greg has a conf. on his calendar during the period of May 9.  Let me check
w/him to see if he really plans on attending the conf.

Liz

From: Christie Patrick on 03/19/2001 02:20 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Executive Program - March 21- Greg Whalley

hi Greg!

Stanford is not giving up on your participating in a speaking engagement.  As
set forth below, how about MAY 9th??

Thanks!

--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 02:19 PM -----

	"Haim Mendelson" <haimmendelson@home.com>
	03/16/2001 12:03 AM
	Please respond to "Haim Mendelson"

		 To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Executive Program - March 21- Greg Whalley

Christie,

Thanks.  How about May 9? We can probably do May 8 or 10, but May 9 looks
best.

Thanks

Haim

*********************************************************************
Haim Mendelson
The General Atlantic Partners Professor of Electronic Business and Commerce,
and Management
Co-Director, Center for Electronic Business and Commerce
Director, E-Commerce Executive Programs
Co-Director, Strategic Uses of Information Technology
Stanford Business School
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
Phone: (650) 725-8927
Fax: (650) 725-7979
Email: haim@stanford.edu
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/cebc/
*********************************************************************


Attached is an amendment worksheet for Markwest Hydrocarbon.  We are just
amending the Collateral threshold at this time.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

John


Thanks LD!  I'm sure I'll be spending a bunch of time in both places!  DF

From:	LD Stephens/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 08:47 AM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	FW: Organization Announcement

Congrats and good luck in the new job!
We will miss having you in Omaha, but Texas is a great state.
Best wishes
LD

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To:	Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject:	Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
11:46 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
09/19/2000 10:36 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099

Thanks for the great info Darron.  I am already aware of this bill and have
already written both TX Senators.

Better get your hammer and sickle ready comrade.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           09/19/2000 10:16 AM

To: Greg Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099

I got this from some hunter friends.  Thought you would like to read it.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
10:15 AM ---------------------------

Alton Smith <altsmith@cisco.com> on 09/15/2000 08:25:26 AM
To: mail143232@pop.net
cc: byd@digitex.net, david_craft@wbw-pc.com, imopiano@io.com,
geoterri@flash.net, ghammond@mdavidlowe.com, jeff_graham@condley.com,
Mfowler1@airmail.net, nealk@wt.net, randy.g.kruger.jr@arthuranderson.com,
sschroed@us.ca-indosuez.com, b3wells@aol.com, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dennis.patrick@telops.gte.com, Abel_Acosta@cca.court.state.tx.us,
mail143232@pop.net, randy@mcdonaldinc.com, Eric.Gunther@sabre.com,
eric.kupper@sabre.com, rambo1@oknet1.net, ClintonMur@aol.com,
wwhent@lipan.net, Sgt_Maj@email.msn.com, fbarowsk@cisco.com,
jeff@huntingwithjeff.com
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099

Sorry for the wide distribution.  However, I thought all my hunting buddies
should be aware of what's going on.  Who knows we may be asked to register
sling shots in the future.

Thanks

>From: "Jim  Hamilton" <jrham@worldnet.att.net>
>To: "Alton Smith" <altsmith@cisco.com>
>Subject: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:45:34 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
>
>This along with the other smoke and mirrors is becoming the norm for our
>Government. WHY do they fear honest law abiding citizens exercising their
>2nd amendment constitutional rights? If anyone thinks that the NRA is a
>little club of paranoid reactive, they should review their feelings. Send
>this on to everyone you know.  It is time to vote and let these individuals,
>that suppose they are above the law and can rewrite and violate our
>constitutional rights, know they are mistaken. These people know it would be
>very difficult to eliminate our rights through the front door and in the
>light of day. They will seek any and all methods to accomplish these agendas
>behind the scenes.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Burnett <mtdburnett@hotmail.com>
>To: barandbag@mediaone.net <barandbag@mediaone.net>; P015@persnet.navy.mil
><P015@persnet.navy.mil>; GRANATHA@aol.com <GRANATHA@aol.com>;
>allanwendt@hotmail.com <allanwendt@hotmail.com>; ahansen367@home.com
><ahansen367@home.com>; rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com <rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com>;
>flyov10s@aol.com <flyov10s@aol.com>; perrymm89@yahoo.com
><perrymm89@yahoo.com>; cnaarndt@aol.com <cnaarndt@aol.com>; mamzic1@aol.com
><mamzic1@aol.com>; smokinf18@aol.com <smokinf18@aol.com>;
>davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com <davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com>;
>Doerings2@aol.com <Doerings2@aol.com>; DDBaggett@aol.com
><DDBaggett@aol.com>; keprice95@aol.com <keprice95@aol.com>; stearns@hctc.net
><stearns@hctc.net>; smithgh@rocketmail.com <smithgh@rocketmail.com>;
>greg.fred@juno.com <greg.fred@juno.com>; delvoeg@aol.com <delvoeg@aol.com>;
>jrham@worldnet.att.net <jrham@worldnet.att.net>; jrham51@yahoo.com
><jrham51@yahoo.com>; btarlton@aol.com <btarlton@aol.com>;
>jeffhardee@hotmail.com <jeffhardee@hotmail.com>; Mitch3p@aol.com
><Mitch3p@aol.com>; bchdriver1@aol.com <bchdriver1@aol.com>;
>jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com <jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com>; jwconnors@aol.com
><jwconnors@aol.com>; johnnycme@aol.com <johnnycme@aol.com>;
>pjschmitt@fedex.com <pjschmitt@fedex.com>; JBrown8245@aol.com
><JBrown8245@aol.com>; Delta75@aol.com <Delta75@aol.com>; KAPD39@aol.com
><KAPD39@aol.com>; Ringledoc1@aol.com <Ringledoc1@aol.com>;
>Raymo1@ix.netcom.com <Raymo1@ix.netcom.com>; prendad@aol.com
><prendad@aol.com>; r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net
><r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net>; RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil
><RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil>; ronbo@newbernnc.com <ronbo@newbernnc.com>;
>PILOTFA@aol.com <PILOTFA@aol.com>; SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com
><SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com>; scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com <scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com>;
>wedgewise@aol.com <wedgewise@aol.com>; stevesande@aol.com
><stevesande@aol.com>; vsorlie@home.com <vsorlie@home.com>; weshope@juno.com
><weshope@juno.com>
>Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:53 PM
>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>
>
>>FRIENDS,
>>PLEASE FORGIVE THE LARGE LIST.  THIS COULD BE A BIG DEAL TO SOME OR ALL OF
>>YOU.  AN OLD AND RELIABLE MARINE FRIEND OF MINE SENT THIS.  TAKE A LOOK AND
>>ACT ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN CONSCIENCE.
>>THANKS,
>>MARTY
>>
>>
>>>From: "Joe & Norma Morris" <sbeanokie@tah-usa.net>
>>>To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@tah-usa.net
>>>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:56:58 -0500
>>>
>>>Got this last night,
>>>Thought  all you guys who may not have known before would like to see what
>>>is going on behind the scenes  with the IRS now. Very disturbing
>>>Bill
>>>---- Original Message -----
>>>From: Bryant L. Metler
>>>To: Zana Smith
>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:38 PM
>>>Subject: Be aware, Bill -- The following message is for you and freedom
>>>loving Oklahomans
>>>
>>>
>>>The following was forwarded to me today by my son David;  we will
>>>immediately begin the battle against this end-run around the Constitution
>>>!!!
>>>
>>>Subject:  Fw: This is not good!
>>>
>>>I have read this Senate Bill, this message is serious.
>>>
>>>Tim
>>>
>>> > OK folks, time to let them know...Toll free number: 888-449-3511
>>> >
>>> > Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2000 1040 federal tax
>>> > form
>>> > all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of
>>>$50
>>> > per gun.  This bill was introduced on Feb. 24. This bill will become
>>>public
>>> > knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law. This is an amendment to
>>>the
>>> > Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can
>>> > pass
>>> > this without the Senate voting on it at all. The full text of the
>>>proposed
>>> > amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage. <http://www.senate.gov/>>> >
<http://www.senate.gov/> > You can find the bill by doing a search by
>>>the
>>> > bill number. (SB-2099)
>>> >
>>> > You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do.  Please send a copy of
>>> > this
>>> > e-mail to every gun owner you know to help.
>>> >
>>> > STOP this bill!!
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>
>>
>
Alton Smith

Systems Engineer
Global Systems Integrators
Cisco Systems

Office:  972-364-8802
Pager:  800-365-4578

http://www.cisco.com/go/uschannels/


Just let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evelyn Kahl [mailto:ek@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Thanks, yes I would at some point.  I have a theory for avoidance of forward costs that I've been working on and quietly marketing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Thanks.  I think that's, well, a very aggressive view of how IOU debt
and past and forward DWR costs are likely to be treated.  Be happy to
discuss further if you like.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Evelyn Kahl [mailto:ek@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Jeff:

1.	Yes, very likely.

2.	415.421.4143

3.	I've been faced with implementing DA deals this last week.  I've
heard
two marketers say that there will be no "exit fees" -- i.e., no
responsibility for utility debt or past or forward DWR costs.  Is this a
commonly held view (or fantasy) among marketers?

Evie

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Thanks, Evie.

1) If someone writes a decent appeal, might you folks be interested in
signing?
2) Do you have Michael's # where I can reach him tomorrow.  Sorry for
the bother.  And if you'd like to hear about what we're thinking about
regarding QFs, be happy to share it with you as well.

Be safe,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Evelyn Kahl [mailto:ek@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Hi Jeff:

1.    Don't know at this point what if anything we'll do.  We haven't,
as you undoubtedly seen, taken a lead on DA issues.  We do, however,
have another case up our sleeve that would aid DA should it come to be.
More when that develops.

2.    Yes, Michael does QF work.  He typically works with the QFs who
have contracts to sell power; I work more on the consumer side with the
QFs who build primarily to self-serve.    (In other words, he looks more
a power generation, I look more at end-user issues.)  Certainly feel
free to call him.  He's in DC today at the RTO workshops, but I believe
he'll be here tomorrow.

Hope you're safe and well.

E

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:47 PM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing

Hi Evie:

Two quick things:

1) My understanding is that the PUC has denied the applications for
rehearing.  There's a group that is fixing to take it to the court of
appeals level--can't see any downside ( a) argument is that the PUC
erred in its decisionmaking--no record, no facts, no evidence, etc., and
that it needs to go back to the drawing board and get the process right
before it suspends anything--and b) the heavy-lifting was already done
getting the app. for rehrng prepared).  Seems like getting a chance to
re-argue at the PUC has alot of positives.  Were you planning on doing
anything?

2) I want to talk to Michael Alcantar about some interesting QF ideas,
but wanted to check with you first.  Frankly, I'm ignorant as to whether
that still occupies a big spot on his plate, if he represents the same
folks, etc., and thought I'd check with you first.

Hope (all things considered) you're doing well.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


any news on Alliance?       i haven't heard shit!   bye


Solid e-mail!!


Vince,
Jeff Planck is part of Tracy Pan's team.

Jason
---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:03
PM ---------------------------

"Planck, Jeffrey G." <jplan90@entergy.com> on 04/27/2001 03:20:36 PM
To: "'jason.sokolov@enron.com'" <jason.sokolov@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Binomial

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Planck, Jeffrey G.
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:16 PM
> To: 'jason.sokolov@enron.com'
> Subject: Binomial
>
> Jason,
>
> This is part of our project. We would use it to estimate american premiums
> and then add that premium to valuations that give european values.
>
> I hope it goes through.
>
> Jeff
> (I'm on Tracy and Nan's team)
>
>
> .....Didn't work
>
> I'll try zipped version.
>
>  <<Big Binomial.zip>>

 - Big Binomial.zip


I will have to bring another MAN to our event in order to break my previous
"family-on-family" event into a "we will MAN-off and let the family go do
whatever the hell they want" night.  A couple of you know him already --
Dave Weiland, and he'll be in town that night.  Otherwise, we'll just go to
Tony's by ourselves, for whoever's interested in that route.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

OK...fine....did everyone get that? Fantastic. Who the f%k is going?tomorrow, dammit? Where the HELL is Chad (Monkey-Noise Boy)? No responses?from anyone? Wake up MEN... I will be leaving the office shortly, so call?cell to RSVP...713-817-1661. I would prefer a 'thread" until such time that?I leave (one o'clockish).??-----Original Message-----?From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com] ?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:32 PM?To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS??I think it has to do w/ evolution of phrases.  In the 12th century, the?phrase was "hairier than a butt tick" (which doesn't make sense unless you?trace it back to days when man invented the three point stance), but went?through a series of common usefulness in differing global regions, ending in?Northern Iceland (where the women are beautiful, but it is very cold - get?the idea?).  The phrase didn't change much from there until the Salem Witch?Trials.  What I'm trying to figure out is how it ended-up at a rodeo.??Ok, hope that helps. I gotta get back to my oh-so-useful mgmt training?class.??-----Original Message-----?From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:26 PM?To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS???Hare is correct...how about "cold as a witch's tit". What the hell is that??Someone said that last night at the rodeo and I'm still trying to figure?that one out. Heard it many times before, but like you, have never thought?to "overthink" such a quote. I'm very confused and getting angrier by the?minute...??-----Original Message-----?From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com] ?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:20 PM?To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS??isn't it hide nor "hare"?  I really don't know, and can't make sense out of?it all. I've been paying attention to phrases lately that just don't make?sense.  Like chocolate thunderbolt, baby.  It's a stretch to make it work,?but oh so fitting for the setting. ??Do you know what I want???-----Original Message-----?From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:13 PM?To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS???Chet...is that a proper RSVP? Can't make hide nor hair outta that. Are you?IN? or not? C'mon dude, make it happen...??-----Original Message-----?From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com] ?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:10 PM?To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS??Man, now I'm upset.  My "buddy" up here said he'd get a group of his "team"?together for that night as well.  After a few margaritas, it won't really?matter what happens. C'mon, man. What???I'll bring my pickle packets.??-----Original Message-----?From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:06 AM?To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS???Make it happen, Chetuck. BTW...whatever happened to your reply about our?impending "foursome"??? Very "excited"  about the opportunity...??OK...this is the final and definitive MAN NIGHT agenda...it WILL NOT CHANGE,?heretofore.??Where?- Tampico Mexican Seafood.  610 to Airline...Right on Airline, Go?about 4 blocks, you will pass the Farmers Market and just past that will be?Tampico. Queried Zander again about it this morning and he said they DO have?security and the clientele is an eclectic mix of Mexican day laborers?drinking Mexican beer and those little packets of salt and lime, dining next?to large tables of rich blue-blood yuppie types...Good Fun. Kind of like a?good noodle house or other oriental type place...if you see the natives?eating there, you know it's good. Besides after listening to Joe and Chet, I?would agree that Tony's is ABSOLUTELY OUT OF THE QUESTION.??When?- Thursday 2/28- 7:15 pm.??Who?- Head count is as follows...Piggy, Lease Nazi, Captain Safety,?Monkey-Noise Boy, Big Boy Chambers (?), Fenner-Weiner(?)??MEN...please RSVP such that we can appropriately "sign" to the non-English?speaking staff how many Ritas we need to order upon arrival.??See you MEN at the MAN function, to do MAN-typical things.??								PIGGY??-----Original Message-----?From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com] ?Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:28 AM?To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; Fenner, Chet;?c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS??Eat me, Wollam.  Did you notice the "Out of Office" message from my email,?home slice???Not sure what the 20 "MAN NIGHT" emails are in my inbox from yesterday, but?noted the Thurs. night dinner.  I have conflict which I will try to unwind?for my attendance.  However, not sure that we want to be at Tony's on such?night, based on what my co-worker says!??-----Original Message-----?From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com] ?Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:40 AM?To: Brian Constantine; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;?c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS??I hear back from John more than I do Chet.?Chad and I are going for noodles in a few minutes. Joe do you want to join ?us???Brian, your in charge of the REVISED FINAL PLAN FOR MAN NIGHT. good luck. ?I'll go where I'm told. e.???>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>?>To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, <knipe3@msn.com>, ?><chet_fenner@bmc.com>, <c.r.zander@att.net>, <Joe.Parks@enron.com>, ?><john.chambers@bisys.com>?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:30:13 -0600?>?>Where is Chad?? Chet??? Does Chambers ever respond to anything...who is he,??>for that matter? For the love of God...?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]?>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:27 AM?>To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; ?>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>NO< NO< NO... this is now going to get way to confusing. WHo is going?>anyway, just me and you Brian??>?>You need to make your pick and send out a REVISED FINAL PLAN after hearing?>from everyone.?>?>?> >From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>?> >To: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, "Erik Wollam"?> ><erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>,?> ><knipe3@msn.com>?> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:34 -0600?> >?> >According to E, that is indeed the case. I will roll the dice and go to?> >Tampico (leave any valuables locked securely in your glove box). Set ?>alarm.?> >?> >-----Original Message-----?> >From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]?> >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM?> >To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >?> >yes, according to chet's co-worker?> >	-----Original Message-----?> >	From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?> >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:14 AM?> >	To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >	Is Thursday night, "Man Night" for "those kinds of men" too????> >?> >	-----Original Message-----?> >	From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]?> >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:09 AM?> >	To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >?> >	so your proposing we are going to the stabbing cabin. go to tampico?> >		-----Original Message-----?> >		From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?> >		Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:08 AM?> >		To: Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe?> >		Subject: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >?> >		Men,?> >?> >		            The final descision on the night of men will be?as ?>follows...?> >?> >		Where: Tony's Mexican (bring your own clown and accessories,?please)?> >?> >		When: Thursday 2/28 at 7:15 pm.?> >?> >		We will wait until Zander is able to attend, to try the?Tampico place.?> >Would rather go w/ someone who knows the drill.?> >?> >		I am very much looking forward to seeing all of you men.?> >?> >?> >                Pig-N-a-Stinky-blanket?> >?> >?> >?**********************************************************************?> >	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant?affiliate?> >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of?> >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure ?>by?> >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or?> >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or?> >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and ?>delete?> >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are ?>not?> >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence ?>a?> >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its?> >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be?> >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.?> >Thank you.?> >?**********************************************************************?>?>?>?>?>_________________________________________________________________?>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:?>http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx?>?????_________________________________________________________________?Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


John, FYI and consideration.
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
12:08 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 09:38 AM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Suggestion of Trading Gasoline on EnronOnline

Mike, Jeff has asked that you review and respond.  Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Peter S Lee@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/06/2000 01:59 PM
To: Jeff Skilling@ENRON
cc: Warren Wang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Thomas
Liu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chicheng
Yang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justo Wong
Liong/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shengli
Wu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Suggestion of Trading Gasoline on EnronOnline

Mr. Skilling,

We are a group of EE&CC engineers and we have an idea about trading gasoline
online.

Enron can trade gasoline as a commodity the same as natural gas and
electricity.  The idea is any one can buy an amount of gasoline at a
pre-determined price with a certain premium for an extended period.  Which
means there is an expiration date for the investor or buyer.

When the gasoline price is low, such as last year, people are able to buy a
certain amount of gasoline from Enron,( Enron is to negotiate with gasoline
producer for an amount and certain price (whole sale) that Enron believes
they can sold in a certain period of time through market study and be able to
make the profit), say  3000 gallons regular unleaded and with 10% (the profit
margin to be determined  by Enron) premium.  The buyer will receive a debit
or credit card to be used to purchase the gasoline and  the amount will be
automatically recorded  each time when they fill up the cars until the amount
of pre-purchased gasoline is used up in that period of time (prior to the
expiration date).  The buyers (or customer) can also sell the unused gasoline
back to Enron anytime before the expiration day the same price they bought
from Enron for profit if the market gas price is lower or take a loss if the
market price is higher.   By doing this, Enron creates a market that can
allow customers to short the gasoline when the market is high.

There are many other ways to trade the gasoline. Nevertheless, the potential
market ( if a minimum of 50% household can sign up) is tremendous.  I
sincerely believe that Enron has the capability to make it happen through
existing Enron online e-business. We hope this idea has not been thought out
before for its feasibility.

Regards,

Peter Lee
Warren Wang
Victor Wu
Thomas Liu
CC Yang,
Justo Wang Liong


Please prepare a draft ISDA pursuant to the attached credit worksheet and
deliver to Agustin Perez.  Thank you.


We cannot afford a communications or performance breakdown.  I am looking to you to insure that one does not happen.

Rick Craig
04/26/2001 07:51 PM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject:	Re: Organizational Announcement

Stan, thanks for the comments.  With regard to EOTT, we plan to keep the same attention and focus on all of the EOTT initiaitives.  I'm a little bit surprised by your comment that they didn't know because I talked with Dana the day after I announced it at Phil's staff meeting.  Obviously something broke down somewhere and I need to keep that in mind in the future.

Relative to your second concern, I'd be less than honest with you if I told you that I don't have the same concern.  Phil and I discussed this at some length but since his work on the international side was winding down and Hawkins really didn't have anything for him going forward we thought his measurement background and technical knowledge might be a fit here.  Don and I talked to Lohit at some length about the communications and relationship building required for him to be successful in the job and he felt he could handle it.  I plan to stay on top of it.  If I see the communications and/or relationships that are required for this job breaking down, I plan to deal with them quickly through the performance mangement process.  Hope this answers your questions.

Stanley Horton
04/23/2001 08:02 AM
To:	Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Re: Organizational Announcement

Are you sure Lohitt is the right person to do this job.  What about EOTT?  No one at EOTT even knew that Steve was leaving before I told them last week.  Communication skills are crucial in this job and I never thought that was one of Lohitt's strong skills,

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


What I meant by the term "electric disconnect", which I thought was catchy
but may have been inartful, was simply that supply and demand signals were
screwed up.  This is the "Shelly Corman" argument, which may or may not have
any factual basis, but I put it in there to have it in front of people for
discussion.

	Steven J Kean
	12/12/2000 02:07 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

Given the way the numbers came out, I guess we don't need the talking points,
but we should still try to get to the bottom of this because we will be
called on to comment to regulators and media.  Unless we have strong evidence
to the contrary, it seems to me that wholesale markets are working .... they
are open and they are competitive.  On the other hand, retail gas markets
suffer from the same problems as electric markets ... they are not open,
customers don't have effective choices and price signals don't get through,
so there is no demand response when prices rise.

On the points raised in the attachment, I'm still not sure I follow point 4.
Also what does" electric disconnect" mean?

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/12/2000 02:40 PM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

Leslie:  Looks good.  Just a couple of comments:

1. General
May want to point out that the roots of California's current gas woes are the
same ones causing the electric problem---combined effect of California's
"import-based" energy policy and the state's failure to invest in in-state
infrastructure.  California imports about 25% of its electricity, but about
80-90 percent of its gas supply.  California has failed to invest in the
in-state infrastructure necessary to support increased gas demand over the
last decade.  So we've got an interstate pipeline superhighway to the border
and a dirt road of in-state transportation once you get into California.
The last bullet seems to suggest that manipulation may be taking place.  Can
we support that suggestion, and is it one that we want to make necessarily?
If we do suggest that manipulation may in part explain current prices, do we
need to propose ways to eliminate it?  Otherwise, seems that we may be giving
FERC ammunition to take action without trying to "steer" that action in the
right direction.  Maybe I'm reading too much into the bullet.

2. Specific
Competition for gas coming to California has increased significantly.  The
midwest (via Alliance) is competing away Canadian gas.  The Southwest
(Nevada, Arizona) is competing away supply from the Southwest before it hits
the California border.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	12/12/2000 11:58 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:07 AM
---------------------------
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

We thought it would be good to basically give Chair Hoecker talking points
with any numbers that Enron provides.  We will visit on these later today
when the numbers are ready (before 3:00).  Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 12/12/2000 11:56 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Talking points about California Gas market

Here is my stab at the talking points  to be sent in to FERC along with the
gas pricing info they requested for the California markets.  Let me or
Christi know if you have any disagreements, additions, whatever.  I am
supposed to be out of here at 2:15 today, so if you have stuff to add after
that, get it to Christi.  Thanks.


I'm taking over Carla Hoffman's position at the Deal Control desk in
Portland, and I've got a request from Kim Ward to look into this deal entered
incorrectly by our Short Term Southwest desk. Unfortunately, I need more
information, such as the deal number and term, in order to make any changes
to it.

If you have this or know who does, please let me know and I'll be happy to
make any necessary changes to this deal. My number in Portland is
503.464.7486.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 11/17/2000 05:02 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Kim Ward                           11/15/2000 10:31 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: DSM 5261

Kate,

A request (below) has been made to fix a deal that was entered by Tom and
Mark incorrectly (through the option exercise function in deal blotter).  The
deal numbers and legs that need to be fixed are listed below.  Instead of
being a forward transaction, these legs should be entered as index forwards.
We are paying the DJ PV index plus $5 or 5%, whichever is more.  Therefore,
if daily prices were more than $100 at palo verde, the offset should be 1.05.

I know that i have totally confused you but let me know of any questions you
might have and I will be glad to help.

Thanks,

Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 09:31 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Katrina_Johnson@enron.com                           11/14/2000 02:03 PM

To: Kim.ward@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: DSM 5261

Kim,

The message listed below was previously forwarded to Caroline.  Per
Caroline, I would need to talk to the actual Trader.  Please let me know if
you can help me resolve this issue.
Please call me at ext.  3-6488 if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Katrina

Katrina Johnson
11/14/2000 03:02 PM

To:   Caroline Emmert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  DSM 5261

Caroline,

Deal #420886 legs 3-7 have no price attached to the deal.  Would you please
add the DJPV index plus an offset of 5%.  On legs 2 & 8 the offset needs to
be changed from $5.00 to 5%.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank You,
Katrina


1. Remedies, Jurisdiction, Arbitration and Governing Law.  Money damages
would not be a sufficient remedy for any breach of this Agreement by
Optionor, and the Optionee shall be entitled to specific performance and
injunctive relief as remedies upon proof of any such breach.  Such remedies
shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedies for a breach of this
Agreement by Optionor or any of its Representatives but shall be in addition
to all other remedies available at law or in equity to the Optionee.
Excepting the right of Optionee to seek such relief, all claims and matters
in question arising out of this Agreement or the relationship between the
parties created by this Agreement, whether sounding in contract, tort or
otherwise, shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to the Federal
Arbitration Act. The arbitration shall be administered by the American
Arbitration Association ("AAA").  There shall be three arbitrators. Each
party shall designate an arbitrator, who need not be neutral, within 30 days
of receiving notification of the filing with the AAA of a demand for
arbitration.  The two arbitrators so designated shall elect a third
arbitrator.  If either party fails to designate an arbitrator within the time
specified or the two parties' arbitrators fail to designate a third
arbitrator within 30 days of their appointments, the third arbitrator shall
be appointed by the AAA. It is expressly agreed that the arbitrators shall
have no authority to award punitive or exemplary damages, the parties hereby
waiving their right, if any, to recover punitive or exemplary damages, either
in arbitration or in litigation. The place of the arbitration shall be New
York, New York.


Carol & Jeff -

I received the below email from Priscilla Hamic regarding Southern Company Services.  It appears that they are not going to pay for November delivered gas, as they want to unwind/net across entities.  We don't have any cross-company netting agreements with Southern Company, so they don't have the right to do this.

Do we need to send them a letter advising the same?  What should we do with respect to this?

Thanks,

JRW

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamic, Priscilla
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Dhont, Margaret
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Southern Companies Services

Southern Company Services will not be paying their invoiced amount because they want to unwind forward deals and net across entities.  They sent letters to terminate yesterday and will be faxing me a copy for my files.

Priscilla Hamic
Enron North America Corp.
Tel: 713-345-3736
Fax: 713-646-8420
E-mail: priscilla.hamic@enron.com


LIQUID

new work by Dornith Doherty

1 june d 7 july 2001

LIQUID, new work by Dornith Doherty, featuring color photographs and video
work, opens June 1 from 6-8:30 P.M. at James Gallery. ?The exhibition is
accompanied by a color brochure with an essay by Susie Kalil. ?James Gallery
is located in Houston?s Museum District between West Alabama and Richmond
Avenue, east of Montrose Boulevard. ?Gallery hours are Wednesday-Saturday 10
A.M. to 5:30 P.M.

". . . The tableaux Doherty creates for the camera can evoke the odd
curiosities assembled by 19th century scientific explorers. ?But Doherty?s
reconfigurations, her re-filling of the skins of things, are nothing less
than acts of reincarnation. ?As master of her fabricated world, Doherty
breathes new existence into the most ordinary materials and detritus. ?By
focusing on the tension between chaos and order, perception and illusion,
Doherty folds systems of understanding back on themselves to confound
seemingly distinct categories. ?Her photographs investigate the world rather
than represent it, reminding us of seasonal change and the transience of
existence. ?They engender something akin to sensory whiplash. ?We come up
close and peer at the large-scale images - searching, scrutinizing, scanning
- much the way she must have done while setting her sights through the view
camera?s ground glass. ?They bring the viewer?s eye up short with shadowy
projections that belie illusion. ?It?s not a violent phenomenon, but a
captivating one, a persistent reckoning of the friction between form and
void, solid and phantasm.

In photography, however, paradox is paramount, the lie is taken for truth,
and the real is understood only in terms of its simulation. ?Accordingly,
Doherty?s images attend to the lonely but pleasurable activity of looking.
They concentrate on the duration of vision - time, the memory of time, the
specific lunar radiance of dreams. She reminds us that those things touch off
in us a deeper desire; it?s as if she peels off layers of the apparent
richness of ourselves, arguing us back to the realm of great, raw, objectless
longing . . ."

.from Liquid
an essay by Susie Kalil

Dornith Doherty (a native Houstonian) studied Spanish and French language and
literature at Rice University (BA, 1980), and photography at Yale University
(MFA, 1988). ?She received a William J. Fulbright-Garc?a Robles
Lecture/Research Fellowship (Mexico, 1995), and a Society for Contemporary
Photography Fellowship (1993). ?Her many solo exhibitions include Dornith
Doherty, McDonough Museum of Art, Youngstown State University, (2000);
Dornith Doherty, University Gallery, Texas A&M University (2001); Dornith
Doherty: Fragmentary Evolutions (FotoFest '98), James Gallery (1998), and
Dornith Doherty, Traces, University of Notre Dame Photography Gallery (1997).
?Group exhibitions include FotoFest 2000: 10 x 2 + 2: 22 Texas Artists,
DiverseWorks (2000); The Shelf-Life of Objects: Contemporary Still Life
Photography, University of Texas at Dallas (2000); Dornith Doherty & Sybil
Miller, Rhode Island College (1999); Flora and Fauna, Museum of Fine Arts,
Houston (1999), and Material World, James Gallery (1999). ?Upcoming
exhibitions include a solo at the University of Notre Dame's Isis Gallery
(January 2002) and Aspects of Human Agency in the Landscape (with Sally
Packard and Gary Retherford) at the Arlington Museum of Art, TX (April 2002).
?Doherty's work can be found in the permanent collections of the Museum of
Fine Arts, Houston; the Minneapolis Institute of Arts; the Museum of Fine
Arts, Milwaukee; the Art Museum of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, and the Sheldon
Swope Art Museum, Terre Haute, among numerous other public and private
collections nationally. ?Doherty is currently an Associate Professor of Art
at the University of North Texas.

james gallery

307 sul ross | houston 77006 | 713.942.7035

http://www.jamesgalleryhouston.com

 - Liquid @ James Gallery


Maybe someone from the Risk Mgmt Working Group would also go?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Lawner, Leslie; Pharms, Melinda; Fulton, Donna; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject: FW: Gas Cost Stabilization Seminar

FYI in case someone wants to attend (maybe to get some customers?).  I am not sure why it is called "Gas Cost Stabilization" (unless that refers to a producer buying a hedge) since some volatility sends necessary price signals.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kazzi, Catherine
Sent: Tue 8/14/2001 9:13 AM
To: Committee Members
Cc:
Subject: Gas Cost Stabilization Seminar

The American Gas Association will host a Gas Cost Stabilization Seminar
on September 20-21, 2001 at AGA, 400 N. Capitol St. NW, Washington, DC.
Attendees at this day-and-a-half meeting will learn what caused recent
volatility in natural gas prices and how risk-management tools can
mitigate gas cost volatility.  Speakers will discuss the risks and
rewards of various cost-stabilization techniques.  Regulators and
industry experts will debate regulatory philosophies and practices
regarding volatility mitigation strategies.  The seminar will appeal to
regulators, energy service consultants and lawyers, financial and
investment professionals, supply planners, and gas utility rate and
regulatory experts. Seats are limited.  Please see the attached agenda
and registration materials for fees, hotel arrangements and additional
information.  We look forward to seeing you at this important event.

Catherine
Catherine F. Kazzi
Senior Staff Associate
Regulatory Affairs
American Gas Association
202-824-7233
ckazzi@aga.org < <mailto:ckazzi@aga.org>>

 <<Brochure 3.pdf>>


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/06/2001 10:45 AM -----

	Karen E Jones
	04/01/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: jmaas@llgm.com
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project "Bighorn" (Colstrip Energy Limited Partnership)

Hi John.  I wanted to get you (and Richard Sanders) thinking about a request
we have received from Owen Orndorff (who, for Richard's benefit, is one of
the principals in Rosebud Energy Corp., the general partner of Colstrip
Energy Limited Partnership ("CELP"), in which Enron, now through the "Condor"
vehicle, holds a 25% limited partner interest;  CELP owns a waste
coal-burning QF in Montana).

Rosebud has expressed an interest in filing suit against Montana Power
Company ("MPC"), the facility's offtake purchaser, for MPC's refusal to allow
CELP to remarket power above the minimum contract demand under the facility's
PPA.  I will fax to you and to Richard a memorandum that the Doney, Crowley
firm, which traditionally has done some work for CELP, has prepared regarding
litigation theories and chances of success.  Owen has preliminarily scheduled
a partnership meeting to discuss this issue (among others, as yet identified)
on April 25th in Chicago.

My preliminary reactions to the Doney memo are that, at the time it was
written, at least, there were a number of issues that had not been fully
enough  researched for the partners to be making a decision.  I will ask
Terry Donovan if further work has been done by now.  My initial reactions are
that (1) having the PPA be the subject of a pending lawsuit could make our
current efforts to sell our interest much more difficult;  (2) the potential
is there for MPC to cook up some kind of counterclaim, which, even if not
successful, puts additional pressure on the PPA, could draw out the
litigation, and add costs, not to mention problems for our sale, and (3) the
effort could result in as yet unknown costs to the partners (since, as I
recall uner the partnership agreement, the costs would be borne by the
partners - ??).  I also need to check and see just who within Enron is
supposed to call the shots on the strategy for this, given that the
investment is now held in Condor.

I will be out of the country on vacation beginning late Friday, April 6th,
until Monday, April 23.  I'd like to touch base with you before I leave,
since there won't be much time to develop our response to Owen prior to the
meeting on the 25th.  At that time, we can also talk about what might come up
on the sale effort while I'm out (at this point, there shouldn't be much, as
Terry seems immersed on another deal).

I'll be in SF all this week trying to close on Pastoria, but am reachable at
the office there (415/782-7800) or by pager (800/316-0430).  Thanks.