Rick, do you have any concerns with the attached position I propose to take
here in Alberta?
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 04/27/2001
08:23 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Hemstock                           04/26/2001 04:56 PM

To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Proposed Enron Canada Advocacy Position on Gas Utility Hedging

As I have previously advised, there is an AEUB hearing scheduled to commence
next week in Alberta that will address the issue of Atco Gas hedging the
price of its default supply offering to customers in Alberta.  I am trying to
finalize my instructions to our counsel on the position Enron Canada will
advocate in relation to utility hedging of default gas supply.

Atco is the primary gas utility in Alberta serving in excess of 90% of the
natural gas customers in the province.   Based on the terminology that was
recently used by Dan Allegretti and Sue Landwehr in their memo to Dave
Delainey of April 13, 2001 's I would describe the Alberta gas market as an
"open access jurisdiction" as Atco has existing transportation rates that
allow "core customers" (residential, commercial, and institutional consumers)
to purchase the commodity directly from a retailer.

For the purpose of this hearing it is beyond the AEUB's jurisdiction to
replace Atco as the default service provider by mandating the selection of
one or more default service providers through a competitive bidding process.
Also, in separate hearings the AEUB will be considering the issues of: 1)
more complete unbundling,  and 2) the treatment of natural gas production
assets that are presently subsidizing Atco's gas costs.

Given that Enron is in the process of reconsidering its position on utility
hedging and, more particularly, we have a vision of EES "sleeving" products
to customers through the regulated utility, I thought I better brief you on
the position I would like to advance in relation to Atco Gas being mandated
to hedge default supply for its core customers:

Atco should not be directed by the Board to use financial hedging to fix the
price of natural gas supply to its core default customers as this could
impede the development of the competitive retail market and/or delay entry of
new retail participants
the development of a competitive and functional retail market is in the
interests of core customers.  With the entry of new retailers will come a
variety of new commodity pricing and term offerings
the pace of entry on new retail market participants should not be a function
of what will ultimately prove to be favorable or unfavorable hedging
decisions made by the incumbent default supplier (i.e. unfavorable hedging
decisions may actually accelate the development of a retail market subject to
this being impeded by the introduction of exit fees to mitigate the stranded
costs that may result from poor hedging decisions and subsequent customers
exercising choice).
it is adminstratively cumbersome and difficult for the Board to approve
hedged rates as it would have an obligation to assess and make determinations
respecting Atco hedging decisions.
commodity price choices should be made by the customer who will be subject to
the risks and benefits of this decision.  The decision should not be made on
behalf of all default customers by their default service provider
the Board should focus its attention on the following two issues rather than
on mandating hedging: 1) directing more frequent (rather than seasonal)
default service commodity rate adjustments so Atco's actual monthly gas costs
are more closely reflected in its default service rates; 2) the upcoming
unbundling proceeding where the Board should ensure that unbundling
principles are adopted that will result in Atco's default supply commodity
costs not being subsidized by improperly functionalized costs from other
distribution business functions.

I apologize for the short notice but your advice on whether my position is
okay would be appreciated by tomorrow.

Regards,

Rob


Hey Warren:
Here are a couple of questions we are working on for Duke on the 99's.  If
you could take a look at these that would be great.  Thanks!
Ben 3-7998
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
05:18 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
12/05/2000 01:32 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Property tax - Caledonia

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 01:32 PM
---------------------------

dthudson@duke-energy.com on 12/05/2000 12:18:18 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: Mario_H_Hurtado@duke-energy.com, Swati_V_Daji@duke-energy.com
Subject: Property tax - Caledonia

per my voice mail last week
---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel T
Hudson/NorthAmerica/EnergyServices on 12/05/2000 09:16 AM
---------------------------

Swati V Daji
12/05/2000 11:27 AM

To:   Daniel T Hudson/NorthAmerica/EnergyServices@DukePower
cc:
Subject:  Property tax - Caledonia

Doc 01.07.02  - Talks about a 15% assessment for as valorem taxes.
Doc 01.07.02.01 - Property tax estimates - estimates from 2001-2019  (tax +
pilot payments) are $1M a year till 2009 and then to ~$1.4 M for next few
years beg 2010, dropping back down to $700K level.

In 2000, the property tax was just $500K, as there seems to be no pilot
payment until Jan 2001.

My questions are -
   Confirm that the 15% assessment in first doc is included in the estimate
   The schdule of estimated payments is all inclusive of the payments
   relating to property taxes
   Refer me to doc that talks about the pilot agreement or any other tax
   abatement docs

Thanks.

Swati


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Hunter S Shively
12/28/2000 07:15 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Larry,

I was able to scan my 98 & 99 tax returns into Adobe.  Here they are plus the
excel file is a net worth statement.  If you have any trouble downloading or
printing these files let me know and I can fax them to you.   Let's talk
later today.

Phillip

P.S.  Please remember to get Jim Murnan the info. he needs.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:27 PM
To:	Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	FW: StealthBomer Flying

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Eric Fischesser <ericf@apbenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	'mlenhart@enron.com'
Subject:	FW:  StealthBomer Flying

----------
From: 	Joshua Weber
Sent: 	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:27 PM
To: 	Alex Herman; 'Brad Raley'; 'Brian P Greene'; 'Cary Mckiernan'; 'Chris
Winfield'; 'Derrick Barton'; 'Geoff Luber'; 'Imorde, George CPT'; 'john
micheal moore'; 'jimsch99@yahoo.com'; 'John Neusel'; 'MHAMN@WEBTV.NET';
'Ries, Pete'; 'Scott Dillon'; Eric Fischesser; Mark Flum
Subject: 	 StealthBomer Flying

----------
From: 	C. Corey Rice
Sent: 	Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:01 PM
To: 	'Cary Mckiernan'; 'Darren Betz'; 'Drew Dickerson'; 'Holly Hruska';
'John Neusel'; 'Geoff Luber'; 'Jon Franconia'; 'Josh Henry'; Joshua Weber;
'Kevin Watson'; 'Nathan Huber'; 'Scott Dillon'; 'Tony Tricase'
Subject: 	FW: StealthBomer Flying

http://www.heavensfantasy.com/cool/


Rick --

I agree with Christi.  If no complaints, I'll move forward to start this ASAP.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
11:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay@ECT on 04/03/2001 05:16 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Proposed Strategy

Jim -- Attached are some thoughts on implementation of my new role.  Thanks!


Plus his pores will be so clean.  He also didn't want me tell anyone but fuck
it, I'll spill the beans.  He is getting a colonic.

Tim, front porch sounds good

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lenhart, Matthew
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Gillette, Lisa
Cc: Blanchard, Timothy; Bass, Eric; Hull, Bryan; mmmarcantel@equiva.com;
Mena, Luis
Subject: RE: Happy Hour

whatever gillette.  i will be feeling all loose and relaxed while i am
whooping it up at the grasshopper tonight.


Hey Girlie,

Well, it's official.  I'm moving to Chicago.  This is my last week in
Houston.  I start work up there on March 12th.  If your free for lunch
sometime this week let me know.

Robin


Dynegydirect was experiencing technical difficulties that required it to be
temporarily unavailable.  However the problems have been resolved and
traders may go ahead and log back in to Dynegydirect.
We are sorry for any inconveniences this may have caused you.  If you have
any further questions please contact us at the number below.

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com


Vance,

Deal # 348777 has been created and entered in Sitara for Duke Energy Trading
& Marketing, L.L.C.

Bob

Vance L Taylor
07/28/2000 03:09 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: August Spot Tickets

Bob,

HPLC will be purchasing wellhead gas from the producers listed below for the
production month of August.  This production will be purchased on a "spot"
basis and deal tickets should be created and entered into sitara based on the
following information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume   Price
Duke Energy Trading & Marketing 6347   200mmbtu/d   85% IF/HSC

Additionally, this are Producer Svcs. deals and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
02:51 PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
07/28/2000 09:33 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: August Spot Tickets

Bob,

HPLC will be purchasing wellhead gas from the producers listed below for the
production month of August.  This production will be purchased on a "spot"
basis and deal tickets should be created and entered into sitara based on the
following information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume   Price

Whiting Petroleum Corp   6523   200mmbtu/d   91% IF/HSC
Engage Energy US, LP   5923   775mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC less $0.24
Engage Energy US, LP   5848   240mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC less $0.24
Swift Energy    2630   21mmbtu/d     90% IF/HSC less $0.258

Additionally, this are Producer Svcs. deals and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


did you call me today at work


Bill, I had asked Twanda to get a conference call with you and Dana Davis on
Williams.  I hope that happened . . .   I would like to have a petition ready
early next week.  It will be lawsuit only, not injunctive relief.

I believe Ajello will be finalized this week.  I sent our signed version to
Reliant last week, and I hope to have it signed by Ajello soon.  Once that
happens, we can dismiss.

Thanks.  Michelle

"Bill W. Ogden" <bogden@ogwb.com> on 10/05/2000 03:42:23 PM
Please respond to <bogden@ogwb.com>
To: "Michelle Cash" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

 Hi Michelle...

 Just a reminder: I've heard nothing further on either the Ajello settlement
or the new matter involving Alonzo Williams.

 I'm looking forward to lunch next Tuesday.

 Best regards,

 Bill


We are going to be discussing a potential joint business venture around a
technology company.  I suspect the standard language that is being used by
the originators in Rex Shelby's group would suffice.  Also, the bilateral
form is best as they will be sharing information about the industry and their
companies experience in the industry.

pf

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Finken, Paul
Subject: Re: NDA's

What is the nature of the confidential information being discussed?  Will our
standard language "...furnished in connection with a possible transaction or
other business relationship..." suffice, or do you want to be more specific?
Also, do you want the bilateral form?

	Paul Finken/ENRON@enronXgate 02/21/2001 11:18 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: NDA's

Tana,

I need three NDA's drafted and I would like to see at least one of them
before being sent.

Monterey Designs Systems, Inc.
894 Ross Drive, Suite 100
Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1443
Phone: 408 548 4681
Fax: 408 747 7377
Signer: Bill Alexander
VP Marketing
email:bill@mondes.com

Softknot Corporation
46500 Fremont Blvd, Ste 716
Fremont, California 94538
Signer: Mo Mohaved, CEO & Founder
Phone:510 226 3750
Fax:510 226 2776
email:mmovahed@softknot.com

GreenAsh Corporation
38 Watermill
Sugarland, TX 77479
Signer: Vinh Nguyen, CEO & Founder
Phone 281 989 9823
Fax: 419 831 0787
email:vnguyen@greenash.com

thanks

pf


What type of income is potentially subject to w/h tax?  I assume you're
looking for the interest w/h tax rates.

From: Tana Jones on 07/07/2000 05:07 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: U.S. income tax treaties

Jeff,

We are also usually sent a page from some tax book that show the rate of
withholding for each of the treaty countries.  Their rate of withholding will
impact which form we may or may not need.  Can you send it to me?  Thanks!

	Jeff Blumenthal
	07/07/2000 04:53 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: U.S. income tax treaties

Tana,

Steve Douglas asked that I forward to you the following list that sets forth
those countries with which the United States has entered into income tax
treaties that are currently in effect:

Australia
Austria
Barbados
Belgium
Canada
China
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Egypt (United Arab Republic)
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Kazakstan
Korea
Latvia
Lithunia
Luxembourg
Mexico
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of South Africa
Romania
Russian Federation
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
U.S.S.R.
Venezuela

Please call me at ext. 35777 if you have any questions.

Best regards.


Start Date: 1/20/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012013.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Dana,

Thank you for the encouragement.  I know God is working and He is taking us
to higher heights in Him.  I am excited about how He is transforming me in
all of this.  I am not perfect, still have many faults, but I glad He loves
me in spite of myself.

XOXOX
Bonnie


did i mention that rental fees to use the truck are $67/day?

that aside, our net account is now:

Nancy owes Jeff for Abalone ($67/entree) =  $149,756.39
Jeff owes Nancy for parking fees ($67/day) =         $189.00
Nancy owes Jeff     $149,567.39

Also, thanks a million for the delicious dinner, the very competitive game of
spades, letting me do my laundry, and compelling conversation about
watery/non-watery tomatoes.

Best,
Jeff

You back at work???

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	07/17/2001 02:33 PM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Eldon Sellers'" <Eldon@direcpc.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>
		 Subject: did I forget

to mention that parking fees are $67 a day?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


I volunteered to be a guinea pig.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000 10:22
AM ---------------------------

Michelle Cash@ECT
10/05/2000 10:18 AM
To: Dejoun Windless/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Click at Home Pilot

Hi, I have two more volunteers for the second Click at Home Pilot.  I told
them that it might be full already, but here they are, just in case:  Kay
Mann and Cheryl Lipshutz.  Thanks.  Michelle


Hi Robert

Enron North America is interested in  purchasing 1200 mmbtu/day  El Paso
Poker Lake-Waha  pool gas for April-October 2001 on a firm basis at Inside
FERC El Paso Keystone  Index +.0025.  Please call me if you have any
questions.


Some corrections to the write-up for the first one for EES, some attribtuon
changes (I think) and an additional valuation for EES.  Also, includes
changes to the write-ups for ENA and what I got from Tim Belden.  I also have
a note discussing Tim Belden's "philosophy" in giving me valuations.

EES

RAP '98
Enron raised the issue of the UDCs imposing an artificial cap on the PX
credit for direct customers during the very first proceedings during which
the method of CTC collection was raised.  The CPUC shined us on. Later, we
raised it in the very first Revenue Adjustment Proceeding (RAP '98) RAP '98
and ensured that it became part of WPTF's case as well.  The way the "cap"
worked, the UDCs would not pay ESPs the full PX credit when prices were high
-- they would pay a credit that, when added to the other bill components, did
not exceed the frozen rate for the direct access customer, thereby costing
ESPs a lot of  money  potentially.  It was clear in the previous CPUC direct
access decisions that UDCs had no right to cap direct access credits. Because
of our good case and the fact that the UDCs believed the chance of such high
PX prices was LOW, the UDCs settled on this issue in 1999.

2000 NPV estimated by Dennis Benevides: $30 - 40 million
% Attributed to Enron's GA Efforts: 90%

Green Credit Legislation
Enron and other green suppliers began work in 1998 to extend the credit given
for sales of green power. The credit was scheduled to end by 2002. In 1999,
the money specified in AB 1890 was being depleted rapidly and Green Mountain
took the lead in pressing for legislation. We actively supported Green
Mountain by lobbying legislators and other interest groups, working with
environmental organisations, and spearheading legislative amendments.
Although this bill became wrapped up in the San Diego crisis and ISO/PX
issues, the green credit portion of the bill remained intact.  We had also
decided jointly to propose a ten-year credit and were very pleased and
surprised that it survived into the final bill.  Governor Davis is expected
to sign the bill.

2000 NPV estimated by Dennis Benevides: $50 million
% Attributed to Enron's GA Efforts: 25%

RAP '99
Enron, through ARM, has successfully made its case that retail procurement
and retail sales costs should be removed from the Distribution Charge that
all customers pay.  Direct Access customers would receive a credit on their
bills in addition to the PX credit. Enron was the first party to raise these
issues as part of RAP '98 and got a Commission decision in that case to
determine the credit in RAP '99.  In RAP '99, Enron chose to use ARM to
litigate the case as a cheaper alternative.  Hearings were completed in the
Spring of 2000.  ARM has negotiated settlement rates with certain parties and
has convinced the Assigned Commissioner to draft his own decision to
counteract the unfavorable ALJ decision. An additional credit of from $0.25
to $0.30/MWh is expected.  The decision will be voted out within the next two
months.

2000 NPV estimated by Dennis Benevides: $1 - 5 million
% Attributed to Enron's GA Efforts: 75%

San Diego Marketing
Government Affairs worked closely with EES origination to help the staff
understand the wildly fluctuating regulatory and political arena in San Diego
and to assist its efforts to take advantage of the unique marketing
opportunity afforded by volatile wholesale market prices.  EES created a new
Enron milestone.  Beginning at a point with no personnel working on San Diego
deals, EES moved in and was able to sign deals worth $1 million in three
weeks time.  EES has received kudos from the highest levels of Enron for this
effort, which continues today.  Martin Wenzel and Doug Condon of EES
origination have stated their belief that these deals would not have happened
with the assistance of Government Affairs.

2000 NPV estimated by Doug Condon: $1 million and growing
% Attributed to Enron's  GA Efforts: 90%

ENA

Note:  Tim Belden, VP West Trading Desk, discussed with me how these
valuations would be used.  He found it difficult to assess Gov Affairs'
contribution to the ENA dollars made.  In the end, he settled on the concept
that Government Affairs works, sometimes for years, to present ENA with an
opportunity to make money and then it is up to ENA to run with it.  So, the
value Tim provides is the value ENA made with the opportunity.  I think this
is consistent with the way Dennis Benevides calculated the value for me.

FTR Release April 1, 2000
I have spearheaded the release of firm transmission rights in CA since I
joined the Company in 11/96.  When I joined Enron, the plan of market
participants was to have financial-only rights.  I began working immediately
to move people in the direction of physical rights. A very long and painful
fight ensued, including a number of personal appearances by Bill Hogan. This
culminated with an ISO decision to have physical-type FTRs and to release
some, but not all, FTRs in April of this year.  ENA actively participated in
the auction and became the largest single purchaser of FTRs.  The new
congestion management approach, which Enron also spearheaded, will require
100% release of FTRs, but will not take effect until next year. This
valuation looks only at the FTR release in 2000.

2000 NPV estimated by Tim Belden: $20 million
% Attributed to Enron's Efforts: 90%

ISO Price Caps
Price caps have been discussed in California beginning a few days after the
market opened in April 1998.  Over the course of the last two years,
Government Affairs had as a number one priority to provide rapid advance
information on price caps, educate Board members on the effects of price
caps, and, when appropriate, work to move price caps.  By June, 2000, ENA had
a substantial long position in the market in the West and had millions at
risk when lower price caps began to be discussed in CA in mid June.
Government Affairs, working with Dave Parquet and others, was instrumental in
delaying the movement to lower price caps by six weeks, thereby giving ENA
time to move out of those positions in an orderly fashion .  The following
events happened in 2000.  We entered the year with a price cap of $750,
having fought to raise it to that level in 1999.  In March 2000, the ISO
considered lowering the price cap to $500 but voted to leave it at $500,
because the Board believed at the time that market power had been adequately
mitigated.  After the three very high-priced days in June, the ISO considered
lowering the price cap to $250 with a vote on June 22. Government Affairs
initiated an all-out lobbying effort to convince Board members and their
constituents to oppose lower price caps.  We also lobbied interest groups,
banks, venture capitalists, NYMEX and others to weigh in on this issue with
individual Board Members and the Board itself, going so far as to set up a
special arrangement with the ISO staff to allow interested parties to address
the Board telephonically.  The vote on June 22 failed by ONE VOTE. Instead,
the Board lowered the price cap to $500.  The Board voted again on July 1 to
lower the cap and again the vote failed by ONE VOTE.  Finally, on August 1,
the Board approved the $250 price cap, effective August 7.  In the end, it
was the end-use customers, Enron and the generators who opposed price caps.
Utilities and munis favored them. Enron was the only party lobbying against
the lower price caps (the generators gave up early in the fight) and had
significant credibility with the end-use customer reps on the Board.

2000 NPV estimated by Tim Belden:  $16 million
% Attributed to Enron's Efforts: 70%

New Market-Oriented Board Member
The ISO recently held Board elections for the first time.  Government Affairs
actively sought market-oriented individuals to run for the Board and replace
those that do not support competitive markets.  Enron was successful in
getting about five to run.  The Members selected or confirmed by the EOB have
been held up and we do not yet know the outcome of those Board seats.
However, one seat of interest has been decided.  Dave Parquet suggested a
potential municipal representative who was extremely market-oriented (Michael
Wood, Attorney for the City of Pittsburgh).  Government Affairs worked with
him closely to decide which seat to run for, help him prepare his
application, suggest lobbying tactics, assist in lobbying and support him
with other Board Members.  He won the election and became a Board Member in
early September.  This effort is significant, because the munis voted nearly
100% in support of lower price caps. The position he took was one of those
votes.  All other things being equal, we have now added a vote on our side
that could be instrumental in defeating further efforts to impose lower or
additional price caps, given the close votes that have taken place thus far.

2000 NPV: Tim did not feel this is measurable at this time, but agreed it
could be worth millions if future votes are as close as they have been
% Attributed to Enron's Efforts: 100%


Dear Jonathan:

Thank you for contacting Audi of America.  As there are few differences
between U.S. and Canadian models, moving between the two countries is
generally easy.  However, you should obtain a letter of compliance; this is
a statement by the manufacturer or importer that the vehicle conforms to the
destination country's standards.

You may request this letter from our Corporate Headquarters at the following
address:

Audi of America
Corporate Headquarters
3800 Hamlin Road
Auburn Hills, MI 48326

If we can be of any further help please write again.

Marjorie
AudiTalk

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan.McKay@enron.com [mailto:Jonathan.McKay@enron.com]
Sent: None
To: auditalk@audi.com
Subject: Corporate--Letter of Compliance

Message from Audiusa.com Comments section:
Name      : jonathan  mckay
Address   : 4712 Grove Hill Road. S.W.

            Calgary, AB - T3E 4G2
Country   : CAN
Phone     :
Email     : Jonathan.McKay@enron.com
Birthday  : 13-9-
Respond By: E-mail
Subject   : Request for Information
Comments  : Dear Audi,

I have an A4 I wish to move from
Calgary, Canada to Houston, TX.  Other
than changing the instrument panel, do
you know of any other modifications
needed to do to import this car.  Also,
would you know which government agency
in the USA I need to contact to make
sure there is no problems bringing my
1998 Audi A4.

I have very much enjoyed my A4 and hope
to continue driving my Audi and future
Audi products when I arrive in Houston.

Any information or insight would be
greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

Jon

Car Information:
----------------------
Make:
Year:
Model:

Other Information:
--------------------
Job: SB
Other:
Income Range: 6


Hi

I'm reponding on behalf of myself and Hunter Shively.   Hunter will be out of
the office on Tuesday, and I will have a visitor in the office from Nicor on
that same afternoon.

Thank you for the invitation!


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

FYI.

TJ and Claudette--Please forward to your groups.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

 General Observations

 The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

 FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 03:50
PM ---------------------------
From: Michele Winckowski/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 03:12 PM
To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teb Lokey/ENRON@enronXgate, Maria
Salazar/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: Humor

A Preacher wanted to raise money for his church, and being told that there
was a fortune in Horse Racing, he decided to purchase a horse and enter him
in the race.  However, at the local auction the going price for horses was
so steep that he ended up buying a Donkey instead.  He figured that since he
had it, he might as well go ahead and enter it in the races, and to his
surprise, the Donkey came in third.

The  next day the racing form carried this headline, "Preacher's Ass shows".
The Preacher was so pleased with the  Donkey that he entered it in the race
again, and this time it won.  The next day the form said, "Preacher's Ass,
out in front!"

The Bishop was so upset with this kind of publicity, that he ordered the
Preacher not to enter the Donkey in another race.  The newspaper printed
this headline; "Bishop scratches Preacher's Ass."

This was just too much for the Bishop, and he ordered the Preacher to get rid
of the animal. The Preacher decided to give it to a Nun in a nearby convent.
The headline next day read, "Nun has the best Ass in town."

The Bishop fainted. He informed the Nun that she would have to
dispose of the Donkey. She finally found a Farmer who was willing to buy
it for $10. Next day the paper said, "Nun peddles her Ass for ten bucks."
They buried the Bishop the next day.


Looks like Tom forgot this deal on Friday - I've just entered it. Deal # is
514006. One thing I didn't check on was whether it was off-peak or on-peak.
Does this deal check out with APB? Let me know.

Thanks,
kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/05/2001 07:37 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

have you found out anything on this trade?

thanks

Kerri Thompson
02/02/2001 04:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

she says tom, i guess we can wait until monday.....

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/02/2001 04:38 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

I don't see any deals with any of these terms in Tom's trade log for today.
He's left the office, and I've left him a message on his cell phone - but
until then, I can't really say if this is good or not. Could it be a Mark
Fischer deal?

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/02/2001 02:26 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deal for tom

buy bp energy
25 mw
217.50
march
palo verde

thanks


I would like to schedule a short meeting in your office to  share the
remarkable progress that the Committee to Encourage Corporate  Philanthropy
is making and to ask that you consider hosting a meeting for  ten to fifteen
CEOs of other major Houston corporations to encourage their  participation in
the only forum of CEOs focused on the agenda of corporate  giving.
?
I'm anxious to meet you as we have so many friends in  common: three of your
directors, John Duncan, Pug Winokur and Norm Blake, and  the Slocums, to name
just a few.
?
I look forward to hearing from you.
?
?
P.S. If it works in your schedule, I'm available to come  to Houston on
August 28 or 29 or anytime the week of September  4.


Hello Mr. Arnold,

I hope that things have calmed down in the gas market with the cold weather
finally developing.  I have been selected to come to Houston for final round
interviews.  Do you know if visitors can come to the trading floor to see
what the operations are like?  Also, if you have any hints on approaching
the final round of interviews, I would appreciate them.

Thank you for your help during the application process, and I hope you have
a good week.

Cordially,

Adam Bayer


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

Brenda Whitehead
09/08/2000 04:35 PM
To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Adair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad
Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Battaglia@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Bierbach/NA/Enron@Enron, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I
Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas B Dunn/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Craig A Fox/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Greer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Licato/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal
Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Rome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Parks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
Schaefer/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven (PGE) SCHNEIDER/ENRON@Gateway, Bruce
Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Douglas Clifford/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nick
Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Kent
Densley/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ranabir Dutt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, David Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allan Keel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transactions with Municipalities or Other Governmental Agencies

Per the request of Mark Haedicke, please see this attachment:


Per our conversation, attached is the form of confirmation we use when we
adopt by reference the preprinted form of ISDA Agreement into a form of
confirmation.


Folks-
Sorry for the delay --- major computer problems over here. I have used Ann's
document and added the changes I made as a template. It is in redline and
the questions are highlighted as well. Please look over it carefully and if
there is language you are going to provide please do it post haste.

WE WILL NOT HAVE A 2:00 CALL --- I think most folks are just too damn busy.
So, if there is a question, problem, disagreement, etc on language please
work it out amongst yourselves and send me new language if applicable.
Remember this is due to Rick BY 5:00 PM TODAY!!!!!

Call me with questions,
Delaney

 - REVISED Merged Leg Language.doc


So my line to Louise and Mark is?

-----Original Message-----
From: Callahan, Timothy
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Oxley, David
Cc: Cash, Michelle; Fox, Madeline
Subject: RE: Waiver of US Benefits

I'll get duplicate copies to you for signature. The reason for doing this is more the former than the latter mentioned below.  However, there is a concern that other UK nationals remaining on the UK payroll could try to use the US non-discrimination rules to obtain US benefits, if you were provided both. Their success in such a challenge is questionable.

Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Callahan, Timothy
Cc: Cash, Michelle; Fox, Madeline
Subject: RE: Waiver of US Benefits

OK. Much better. Explain to me again why we have to do this? Is it purely to confirm we don't get stuff twice or is there a concern that our participation in both causes a sub-space paradox which may create a time vacuum into which the entire world population may be sucked?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Callahan, Timothy
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Oxley, David
Subject: Waiver of US Benefits

David,

Let me know if this latest version is acceptable and I'll prepare a waiver for Louise and Mark, as well.

Regards,

Timothy J. Callahan
Director, Global Employee Services
Enron Corp
333 Clay Street, Suite 2025
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone:  713.646.9565
Fax:  713.646.9501


Louise:

Thanks for your note and support.

The response you received is both incorrect and unacceptable.  I will personally look into this and revert back with a solution.

My sincerest apologies,

George
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Wasaff, George
Subject:

So, it all came to pass.  Per our discussion a long time ago - I am now having the problems envisaged with ibuyit.  I have never received an approval request from any of my direct reports.  I have contacted the ibuyit team and asked why not?  Has no-one reporting to me ordered anything?  The response from the team was that they were unable to tell me what the issue was and that I should ask each one of my direct reports to look at the system next time and tell me who they were sending their applications to.  The ibuyit administration team cannot assess this information (ISC helpline).

Please help this is very frustrating - I am trying to be pro-active but its hard.


Coming Up This Week at the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology:

Wednesday, March 27  11:00 - 3:00 PM
INDIAN BREAD BAKING DEMONSTRATION AND SALE
Fresh bread baked in the Maxwell's horno, Indian tacos, fry bread and
pastries.  Maxwell Museum Store will offer a 10% off sale (25% MMA members)
on everything except books.  Join us!


Missy:
If you could change that to a taxi service, that would be great.  Since this is only a one day trip it's makes it a little easier for me.  Thanks again!
Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sturgeon, Missy" <Missy.Sturgeon@Cinergy.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Cc:	rogersofenron@yahoo.com
Subject:	Travel Itinerary -1/4/02
Importance:	High

Ben,

Please find attached your travel itinerary, as well as your meeting
schedule for Friday, January 4th.  I have reserved a rental car with
Hertz, but if you would prefer a taxi, we can make that simple change.
Just let me know your preference.

I have also attached directions to our facility.  We are located at 7200
Industrial Road in Florence, Kentucky.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any
assistance prior to your trip.  Hang on to any receipts for any
out-of-pocket expenses you incur and we will reimburse you.  I look
forward to meeting you.  Have a safe trip!

Missy Sturgeon
859-372-6869

 <<Interview Schedule - Ben Rogers 010402.doc>>
<<florence_industrial_road_facility.pdf.pdf>>  <<Directions to
Florence.doc>>
 - Interview Schedule - Ben Rogers 010402.doc << File: Interview Schedule - Ben Rogers 010402.doc >>
 - florence_industrial_road_facility.pdf.pdf << File: florence_industrial_road_facility.pdf.pdf >>
 - Directions to Florence.doc << File: Directions to Florence.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 12:51 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Norman @ ENRON                           01/06/2000 07:40 AM

To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Alumni List

University of Texas alumni report attached.

LN

	From:  Elyse Kalmans                           01/04/2000 05:01 PM

To: Lisa Norman/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Alumni List

Happy New Year, Lisa!  Can you please pull a list of University of Texas
alumni for me?  I'd appreciate your help.  Thanks!

Elyse
30565


This is the log for the week.  Please let me know today by 4;30pm Houston
time if you have any changes.

Best regards

Shona


I don't know any of these people.  We should probably see if any of the EES
business people know them.  Also, we need to find out if people we know know
them.  For example, why hasn't Peevey been a strong advocate for open
access?  Jeff, do you know? And Sandi, you know all these Dems very well --
any other ideeas?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	Karen Denne
	04/03/2001 07:12 AM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, bhansen@lhom.com,
hgovenar@govadv.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, Ksmith@kdscommunications.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Another List

Attached is the list compiled by Marathon of "influentials" in each of our
priority legislative districts (this week, we're only focusing on Burton,
Bowen, Hertzberg, Keeley and Cox).  Please review the list and let me know
ASAP if you know anyone on the list and would be willing to make calls.
Thanks. kd

 - List of targeted legislators April 2 2001.xls


WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!   What am I going to do with my time???????   Fishing, sitting around in my underwear, spending money without repercussion, going to the BUFFFFEEEET at Ryans.  Heck, I might even make a special trip to Conroe to the best Ryan's in the WORLD>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	ii - vacation

Good morning,
TGIF
Put this on your calendar: I'm taking vacation Nov 16 thru Nov 26.  I'll be in OR the 17th thru the 24th.  I still wish you would come up there with me, at least part of the time.
ii


Money Mail from CNBC
Visit us online at http://www.cnbc.com/mm.html
To cancel or change your subscription options, please
follow the instructions at the end of this message.

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
Looking to put your money to work in an unsteady climate?
Don't get burned by one stock. Try FOLIO Investing and buy
baskets of up to 50 stocks in 1 easy transaction. Buy
indexes, sectors, ETFs or analyst's picks. Take advantage
of our SPECIAL $14.95 CNBC offer.
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMT530&site=http://www.foliofn.com/wsjsp/lp/lp.fsp?id=cnbcpo00020301y

----------------------------------------------------------

Good evening!
Here is your Money Mail for Wednesday, May 30.

BUZZ AT THE BELL
Technology stocks, including Sun Microsystems, led most
other stocks on a mass march to the downside on Wednesday.
Profit warnings, coupled with thin trading and a lack of
buyers, caused most industry groups and shares to decline.

Investors are beginning to question the widely held view
that economic growth and corporate profits are poised to
rebound by the second half of this year, analysts say.

The Nasdaq Composite Index ended down 91 points, or 4.2
percent, to 2085. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell 20
points, or 1.6 percent, to 1248. The Dow Jones industrial
average lost 167, or 1.5 percent, to 10,872.

The focal point of the trading day was Sun.

Sun closed down 13.8 percent at 16.10. The maker of
computer servers warned that its earnings in its fourth
quarter will be less than previously expected. It said
customers are buying less than anticipated, citing Europe
as particularly weak. The news hurt other tech companies.
Cisco, Oracle, IBM, and others also fell.

The most troubling aspect of the sell off was it touched
almost every corner of the market. Energy was the only
major industry group that managed to post a gain, which was
minimal.

Some analysts say investors should take the long-term view
when investing this summer.

Dean Patterson
Stocks Editor, Money Mail

MAJOR INDEXES AND VOLUMES
* Dow Jones Industrials: 10,872.45, down 166.69 or 1.51%
* Dow Jones Transports: 2,901.61, down 19.66 or 0.67%
* Dow Jones Utilities: 388.47, up 0.64 or 0.17%
* S&P 500: 1,248.08, down 19.85 or 1.57%
* NASDAQ Composite Index: 2,084.50, down 91.04 or 4.18%
* Russell 2000: 493.96, down 8.41 or 1.67%
* FTSE: 5,803.90, down 60.00 or 1.02%
* NIKKEI: 13,493.35, down 280.54 or 2.04%
* Ten-Year Treasury Note Yield: 5.51%, up 0.03 or 0.55%

* NYSE volume (preliminary): 1.15 billion shares
* Nasdaq volume (preliminary): 1.96 billion shares

* To see our complete U.S. index list,
http://www.cnbc.com/news/markets/world.html?ReferrerID=MM

SCOUTING REPORT: THURSDAY
The long wait for marguee economic data continues Thursday.
With the May jobs report looming on Friday, the help-wanted
index and Chicago purchasing managers' index should have
little impact. Earnings are nearly done but early warnings
are possible from here on out. In thin trading, funny
things can happen.

STOCKS
* What's Next for Microsoft? *
Some analysts say Microsoft is near a top. Others see even
better days ahead.
http://www.cnbc.com/010530plotkin-stocks.html?ReferrerID=MM

* Buy Strong Cash Flow *
Here are 10 large-cap stocks selling well below what future
earnings justify.
http://www.cnbc.com/news/stocks/010531sterman-stocks.html?ReferrerID=MM

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
"Missed it on CNBC TV? Find it on the CNBC Wire!

Before each opening bell and after each day's close,
CNBC.com brings you the market standouts, stock picks and
personalities of CNBC TV, translated for the Web. Stay on
top of the market -- and the market movers -- with the CNBC
Wire."
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMB530&site=http://www.cnbc.com/news/wire/wireindex.html

----------------------------------------------------------

TOMORROW ON CNBC
* To view the latest CNBC guest list:
http://www.cnbc.com/cnbctv/shows/guestlist.html?ReferrerID=MM

HOTSPOTS ON CNBC.COM
* CNBC Store:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MM&site=http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=1064298%26siteid=36208939%26bfpage=cn
* Golf Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/worklife/lifestyle/golf.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Loan Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/loan/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Message Boards:
http://www.cnbc.com/community/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Small Business Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/smallbiz/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Your Portfolio:
http://www.cnbc.com/portfolio/defaultscreen.html?ReferrerID=MM

Please do not reply to this email. It is sent from an
unmonitored address.

To cancel or change your subscription options, please go to
our Money Mail FAQ page
(http://www.cnbc.com/hlp/moneymailhelp.html) and follow the
instructions. If you cannot click on the link, copy and
paste it into your browser.

If you are interested in advertising with CNBC, please go
to our Advertising Info page
(http://www.cnbc.com/common/footerlinks/adsales.html). If
you cannot click on this link, copy and paste in into your
browser.


NESA/HEA's 35th Annual Sports Tournament is just 2 weeks away, so make sure
you have registered.  If you haven't, go to www.nesanet.org and click on
Educational Programs/Industry Networking and Upcoming Events.

REMEMBER - Registration for all events is at 12:30 p.m. with a starting time
of 1:30 for all sports!! And LUNCH is NOT provided this year, so eat before
you come.  And Bring Your Own Liquor for the dinner at Papa's Social Club...
beer and wine will be provided on a cash bar basis.

GOLFERS - The Oaks and Pines Courses are at the main Country Club, so
register under the arbor near the pro shop.

TENNIS - You will register upstairs in the Tennis Center at 12:30 or you can
show up at noon for the tennis clinic.

GIN RUMMY - You will be registering and playing the Lobby Bar of the
Woodlands Conference Center.

BOWLING - Register at 12:30 at the AMF Bowling Lanes at Woodlands Parkway
and I-45.

After the competition is over, join us at Papa's Social Club for a steak
dinner, live entertainment and awards!

We're in need of volunteers to drive beverage carts and work with other
events.  Let us know if you can help!

See you then...

TERESA KNIGHT
Vice President, Member Services
teresa.knight@nesanet.org
713/856-6525
713/856-6199 (fax)


[IMAGE]
?
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

?

?

?

Dear                     Amazon Customer,

                     There's no doubt about it, the holidays are  here. And
at Amazon.com  we're celebrating like only we know how--with free
shipping! Place your order for over $100, and now through
Sunday,                     December 10, we'll ship your items for  free.

Don't                     worry,  with our great "EMAHTSKCBLVDT"*  selection,
you'll have no problem finding the perfect  gifts                     and
shipping them for free. But be sure to  hurry--you must
place your orders by next Sunday,  December 10, to take
advantage of the best the  season has to offer: free
shipping                     at Amazon.com!

[IMAGE]

?

?

*Electronics, Music, Auctions, Health & Beauty,  Tools,
Software,                     Kitchen, Cameras, Books, Lawn &  Patio, Video
Games, DVD,                     Toys. To see even more about  this click
here.

For                     the fine print, follow the link to our  free
shipping offer.

                    We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if
you'd                    rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from
Amazon.com,             please visit your Amazon.com     account page and
under the Your Account Settings  heading,                     click the
"Update your communication  preferences" link.

Please   note that this message was sent to the  following e-mail address:
mark.e.haedicke@enron.com


Warning: I have not even opened this to see how it looks.

The goal is to delete the reference to WestLB and the master agreement, so I
know there is work to be done along those lines.  At least this is a start.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

"PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/03/2000 04:26:35 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Agreement

Attached are the blacklined versions of the Agreement and Exhibits marked to
show changes from the original document.

The information contained in this e-mail message is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named
above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not an intended recipient, you have
received this e-mail in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete
the copy you received.

Thank you.

 - BL554888.DOC
 - bl554886.DOC


Regulatory doesn't have any issues except internal accounting of the revenue
received and appropriate calculation of the cost charged.   I'll also forward
to you Keith's question regarding who has authority over athe assets and
whether that would require or limit our ability to operate.   MK

Jeffery Fawcett
11/27/2000 04:00 PM
To: Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Citizens request for proposal

Citizens Utilities is in the process of selling off all of its
non-telecommunications businesses throughout North America.  One of their
principal assets, Louisiana Gas Service (LGS) is one of those companies
recently sold by Citizens.  LGS provided gas control and operations services
to other non-LGS companies, including the Citizens Utilities LDC assets in
Arizona.  With the consummation of the sale of LGS, Citizens has told me
confidentially that they have no reasonable way of operating the
interconnect, metering and 1.5 mile lateral pipeline facilities that
interconnects TW and EPNG to the recently constructed Griffith Energy Power
Plant.   Therefore, Citizens is looking to possibly have a 3rd party provide
contract operations services under an operating agreement.  TW has been asked
in writing by Citizens to consider making a proposal to operate these
facilities.

Does TW have an interest in providing contract operations services for
Citizens?  In a related legal/regulatory question, does TW have the authority
to conduct contract services on behalf of others, or would we have to perform
these services as a separate legal entity?  If we do, does this present an
affiliate problem for us if we "share" operating employees?  If these
threshold questions can be accommodated, and TW is not only able to provide
contract operations services for Citizens, but has a commercial desire to do
so, what would we charge Citizens for this service?  Although it would appear
at first blush to be a relatively simple matter to operate these facilities,
remember that Citizens will be receiving gas (potentially) from both TW and
EPNG simultaneously, presenting not only a challenge to balance pressure
between the pipes, but to account for and reconcile deliveries and receipts
from both pipes as well as the plant site.

Although I'm the principal commercial representative for Citizens as regards
transportation matters, I'm certainly willing to step out of the middle of
this negotiation if Operations desires to handle it themselves.  I will be
happy to provide you a copy of the brief 1/2 page letter Citizens sent to me
on the 17th soliciting TW's interest.   Given the relatively short lead time
until LGS operations is sold, Citizens has requested expedited
consideration.  Please let me know how you want to proceed.  Call if you have
any questions.


Since they are pulling out of Major Accounts, not Retail, do we know how much
of their volume at each location falls under Major Accounts?

Chris Germany
02/22/2000 07:17 AM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cora Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: market exits

FYI, not the markets I was hoping to see.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 07:13
AM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/21/2000 04:21:43 PM
To: " - *chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *dick.jenkins@enron.com" <dick.jenkins@enron.com>
Subject: market exits

Chris,

As I indicated on our call about a week ago, CES Retail is attempting to exit
a
number of current markets for Major Accounts business only.  The list that
we're contemplating includes CKY, CG&E, DP&L, East Ohio, Indiana Gas, Western
Kentucky, CVA, COH, and BGE.  Again, for those LDCs where we participate in
Choice programs, we will continue to serve those customers.

We are trying to have this accomplished prior to March flow so that we can
take
March 2000 forward out of our physical requirements from Enron.

I'll keep you apprised as additional information becomes available.

Thanks,

Melissa


Can you add the referenced counterparty to the next list.  We got a signed
master agreement in place with them and I need to change the approvals.
Thanks.


Here is Wednesday's version.  I will be out of the office Thursday and Friday, so no report will be published.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are "indicative" prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit arrangements and the approval of the respective management's of our two companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.  All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions in making your decisions with respect thereto

Mark D. Smith
Manager
Enron North America
713-853-6601
Mark.Smith@enron.com


jhernan3
---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001
01:48 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kayne Coulter @ ECT                           04/10/2001 11:11 AM

To: John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Dustin Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Dahlke/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: enpower user id's

Everyone needs to e-mail your enpower ID to Andrea Dahlke, please do so ASAP.

Thanks
Kayne


Start Date: 12/20/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122007.txt


In case you have an opening....

 - resume.doc


This came from the Kern County Tax Assessor, I thought it might be of
interest.
----- Forwarded by Kenny Maltby/Bakersfield/Eott on 04/16/01 10:38 AM -----

                    "Curry, Jim"
                    <Jim.Curry@EN        To:     Kenny
Maltby/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott
                    RON.com>             cc:
                                         Subject:     FW: EOTT Gas Plant &
Rogas
                    04/16/01             Facility Kern County CA
                    09:03 AM

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   "Bayha, Robert" <BAYHA@co.kern.ca.us>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bayha+2C+20Robert+22+20+3CBAYHA+40co+2Ekern+2Eca
> +2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:   Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:36 PM
> To:     'jcurry@enron.com'
> Subject:     EOTT Gas Plant & Rogas Facility Kern County CA
>
> Thought you might like the attached excel file.
>
> RJBayha
>
>
>  <<EOTT Gas Plant Aerial Photo.xls>>
>
>  - EOTT Gas Plant Aerial Photo.xls <<EOTT Gas Plant Aerial Photo.xls>>
>
 - EOTT Gas Plant Aerial Photo.xls


I know her husband.  I prefer to fill any future openings with trading track personnel.  However I would talk to her.

Louise Kitchen
04/02/2001 03:15 PM
To:	Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Dan McCarty stopped me today and said that he is looking at bringing down an employee from Omaha who has a wife at Tenaska - Lori Neubauer - who would need a job.  Ever heard of her - any interest in talking to her?


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi
Sent: Wed 5/23/2001 1:22 PM
To: Marchris Robinson@ENRON; Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben; Montovano, Steve;
Steffes, James; White, Ann Elizabeth; Thode, Eric; Robinson, Marchris; Grube,
Raimund
Cc:
Subject: Final fact sheet

Any other comments?

 <<florida facts final.doc>>


Sheri -

I'm not sure this is an issue for me.  Aren't you in Lance's group now?

Mark

	Sheri L Cromwell
	02/06/2001 02:08 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hardware Request

Mark,

My mouse is not responding properly (left click), and I need to have it
replaced.  I would like to order the Intellimouse at a cost of $23.

If this meets with your approval, please forward this message to Janette
Elbertson.  Thanks!

Company #0413
CC#105657

Sheri L. Cromwell
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3815
Houston, Texas  77002-7361
Phone:  713-853-3543
Fax:  713-646-3491
E-Mail:  Sheri.L.Cromwell@enron.com


Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:	RE:

Paul received the standard business reorg package as a consequence of the storage group under Jean Mrha being dissolved.   Based on his service and salary, Paul will receive 59,232.92 (assuming he signs a waiver and release)

Additionally, Scott Hendrickson, after 30 days of looking for a position (requested by Lavo), will receive 32,691.38 (assuming he signs a separation agreement).  He was terminated for performance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie; Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:

If anyone ever gets from us a leaving package I or John want to know about it.

Thanks

Louise

Case in point Paul Bienawski?


Here's the agreement I would like to get in front of Mike.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 11:59
AM ---------------------------

"FAYE STEDMAN" <STEDF@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/27/2000 12:54:19 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale Agreement

At the request of Peter Thompson, attached please find a clean copy of the
ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale Agreement.  The formatting has been cleaned
up significantly and the table of contents is now in place.

Peter will be out of the office on Friday, 10/27, however, If you have any
questions or comments, please contact Chris Cobb at (202) 662-3016 who will
be handling this matter in his absence.

Thank you.

 - 82441_2.DOC


Majed,  Wanted to make sure you are still scheduled to start on May 21.  Let
me know if anything has changed.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 10:57 AM -----

	"Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>
	04/17/2001 06:01 PM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com '" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Starting Date

Gerald,

I hope everything is going well with respect to your work load! I know that
you are probably very busy with conference calls. Anyway, I look forward to
working in your department this summer. I have already taken my drug test,
and have given Molly Magee my start dates (tentatively with your approval).
I have my start date scheduled to commence on May 21, 2001 and end on June
29, 2001. I hope these dates coincide with your schedule. Please e-mail me
and let me know.

Looking Forward to this summer,

Majed Nachawati

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
Sent: 4/17/2001 5:09 PM
Subject: Starting Date

Nabil,  Can you please provide the dates that you are planning on
working
for the 1st half of the summer. I called your residence earlier today,
but
your machine did not pick up.    It is probably easier to communicate
via
email since we both keep missing each other.  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/02/2001 09:03 AM -----

	Margaret Allen
	07/02/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Steve Kean
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: GENIE Documents

Hi Steve,

For some awful reason, this did not make it to you on Friday afternoon when I
sent it.  Hopefully it finds you this time!

I received your agenda changes, but I would appreciate you looking over the
steering committee when you have a chance.

Thanks for your time, MSA

----- Forwarded by Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron on 07/02/2001 07:28 AM -----

Delivery Failure Report
Your document:	GENIE Documents
was not delivered to:	Steve Kean
because:	Error transferring to MAILMAN.ENRON.COM; SMTP Protocol Returned a
Permanent Error 550 5.1.1 <Steve.Kean@enron.com>... User unknown

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure
report.
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
successfully delivered to all other recipients.

NAHOU-LNMAI16/Enron, NAHOU-LNMAI16/Enron

	To:	Steve Kean

	cc:	Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dennis
Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

	Date:	06/29/2001 04:22:16 PM

	Subject:	GENIE Documents

Hi Steve,

I have attached the steering committee and agenda for review. Mark has made
significant changes to both documents, so your input would be appreciated.
Please narrow the steering committee list down to around 30.  For the agenda,
please focus on content and not timing (since the dates changed per our
conversation).

Your feedback is needed as soon as possible.  Our goal is to send invitations
to speakers and steering committee members within the next week.

Thank you for your time! Have a good weekend, Margaret


Will you follow up with this guy?  Great seminar.  I enjoyed your talk.  SS

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: City of Palo Alto

Hey Sara -
I think we might be doing a survey (I am not sure).  I ahve been telling
select cities that Merced irrigation has signed a ISDA.

Stewart

Sara Shackleton
05/20/99 08:54 AM
To: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: City of Palo Alto

Tom Kabat, Senior Resource Planner, Resource Management Division for the City
of Palo Alto, Utilities Department, gave me his card yesterday and said he
wanted to get an ISDA started for future trading.  He asked if we had ISDA's
with any other cities, that is, it might make his job easier.  Are you guys
sending follow-up letters to the attendees?  SS

Phone:  650/329-2659

Fax:  650/326-1507


Elena Chilkina was not paid for the following days,
  July 3 and 4.
   Please any questions contact Shirley Crenshaw
or Kevin Moore.
If more information is needed feel free to call x34710.

                                                   Thanks
                                                Kevin Moore


Eliminate your credit card debt without filing bankruptcy!
  Tired of barely getting by?
Tired of making minimum payments and getting nowhere?
Tired of being strapped financially?
Here is what this package do for you!
  *It will terminate your credit card debt!
(Major credit cards only - Not department store cards or gas cards)
*This covers cash advances!
*This covers unsecured loans!
*It will allow you to stop making monthly payments immediately!
*It will empower you to take back the control of your life!
*You will no longer be able to use those credit cards.
*Unlike bankruptcy this keeps your affairs completely private!
Only you, the creditors, and the credit bureau will know.
However, you will not lose your home, or any other assets!
  Call for more information:  1-800-320-9895  EXT 7483

This program runs between $1750 and $2450.  And we accept
all forms of payment! We also offer a guarantee!
To be removed reply to: offthelist1@arabia.com
 Eliminate your credit card debt without filing bankruptcy!


*** PDF version incl. charts is attached ***

German inflation falls more strongly than expected

Nov 01		Actual	UBSW fc	Market	Previous
CPI -  mom%		-0.2		0.0		0.0		-0.3
CPI - yoy%		1.7		1.9		1.9		2.0

n German CPI inflation dropped from 2.0% in October to 1.7% in the
month to mid-November. Thi swas 0.2%pts lower than expected. The
outcome is a consequence of sharply falling energy and food prices.
Core inflation will have remained unchanged. Pipeline inflation
indicators released yesterday underpinned the favourable trend.

n In the absence of further oil price decline, inflation is likely to
rise slightly next month. Further significant declines are expected
from February 2002, taking German inflation below 1% by the middle of
the year. If this is only partly mirrored in other euro area economies,
the ECB will have leeway to cut rates further next year as we expect.

Food and energy prices were the main forces behind the inflation
decline in November. From the state data, we estimate that food price
inflation will have fallen from 6.6% to about 5.5% yoy. Household
energy prices dropped by about 1.6% mom reflecting a substantial
heating oil price decline and petrol prices fell between 0.8% and 3.4%
in the reporting states. Core inflation will barely have changed from
last month's 1.8%.

The favourable German inflation picture was preceded by much larger
than expected declines in October produce r and import prices reported
yesterday. Altogether, the data of the last two days underpin our
forecast that both headline and core inflation will fall substantially
next year. Hence, our forecast of further ECB easing in 2002 Q1 remains
firmly in place.

_______________________________________________
Holger Fahrinkrug
Senior Economist
UBS Warburg AG
Stephanstra?e 14-16, D-60313 Frankfurt, Germany
Tel. +49 69 1369 8280
Fax +49 69 1369 8221
Email: holger.fahrinkrug@ubsw.com


Have accessed the .db files with Mark Fisher and they appear to look good. I
will get with Rabi in the morning and test load the files to the development
side of the Oracle database (STAR).

-John

Jeff Duff
06/24/2002 09:12 PM
To: John M Ruiz/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Auto download tool

John,

If you haven't already taken charge of this, could you work with Patricia to
test the data that Kim Nguyen sent.  Be sure to pass on the results of this
test to Kim and Ron Brzeniski.

Mark,  thanks for jumping in.  There are some features of the tool sent from
Clemens which may be useful, but I do not think it is ready.

JD


On March 14, 01, FERC issued an "Order removing obstacles to increased
electric generation and gas supply in the West.."  (Docket No. EL01-47).

 Most significantly, FERC authorizes industrials in WSCC to sell power to
licensed power marketers (like EPMI and EES) effective 3/14/01 through
12/31/01.  The industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer
license from FERC (subject to EPMI and EES making filings for the
industrials).  (This is similar to the authorization that EPMI and EES
requested nationwide earlier this year -- we should hear from FERC on that
request by mid-May.)

In addition, FERC authorizes DSM sales at wholesale at market based rates.

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations in the WSCC and
used primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public
utilities" subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at
wholesale) can sell power at wholesale from such facilities to non-affiliated
entities (like EPMI or EES) without prior notice under section 205 of FPA
(would usually require 60 day advance notice filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff -- must file a rate
schedule at FERC for this, but FERC will be receptive to granting waivers and
authorizations.
 -- This authorization expires after 12/31/01.
Effective 3/14/01 through 12/31/01, retail customers in WSCC, as permitted by
state laws and regulations, and wholesale customers are authorized to reduce
consumption for the purpose of reselling their load reduction at wholesale at
market-based rates.  These transactions can occur in several ways:  An
aggregator can line up retail load to acquire enough negawatts to resell in a
manner similar to what aggregators do when they sell power to retail load
under retail choice programs.  In addition, wholesale and retail load with
contract demand service could resell their contract demands if the value of
power is greater than the value of consumption.  Similar quarterly reports
would be due by EPMI/EES.
NOTE:  the industrial still has to obtain the interconnection agreement with
transmission provider (may need new interconnection facilities, etc.)
Remember that you still need to get transmission on OASIS when the power is
wheeled away from the industrial.

Other initiatives in the order:

Utilities are encouraged to make DSM arrangements with wholesale customers.
FERC waives the prior notice requirement for amended contracts that are
required to be filed at FERC.
Clarifies that DSM should be treated consistenly with all other types of
incremental and out-of-pocket costs for utilities.
Reminds transmission providers to keep ATCs current, including CBM and TRM.
Provides incentive rates for new transmission projects that can be in service
by July 1 (and to a lesser extent -- by November 1 of 01 and 02).
Considers "rolled in" rates for generation interconnection (rather than
direct assignment that we have now.)
Extends temporary waivers through 12/31/01 of operating and efficiency
standards for QFs.  Allows QF to sell output above historical supply though a
negotiated bilateral agreement at market based rates, if sold in California
and the WSCC.
FERC will review interconnection issues that impede generation from reaching
load (ie, if a utility does not act within time limits on interconnection
requests, etc.)
Provides for increased staff and quicker gas pipeline additions review.

Please let me know if you would like the order.  Ray Alvarez (202-466-9170)
and I (713-853-7007) can assist you with this.  Thanks.


Jeff,
For what it is worth, I  wanted to provide my recommendations of individuals
to oversee the Program.  The major business units should be represented so
that there is not a perception that any unit is more important than another.
Additionally, if they have all bought in and agree it should make the
facilitation of rotations, etc. less difficult to accomplish.  It should be a
very small group and consist of individuals who are well respected in the
organization.

Dave Delainey - ENA   (ENA has 50% of the Associates and Analysts and Dave
has been very supportive of the Programs' objectives.  He has facilitated one
of the Super Saturdays and offered to do others.  He has also agreed to
facilitate the Associate PRC).

Dan Leff - EES  ( Dan is the role model in the organization for leadership
and support of the goals and objectives of the Program and the Company.  At
his direction, his entire organization has been involved in the recruiting
process and the rotation process.  He actually set up a Steering Committee of
his senior executives who meet with Program Management on a monthly basis
regarding the Associates/Analysts.  Dan has been extremely supportive from
day one, prior to anyone being told it would affect their PRC rating.  He is
also the Executive lead on two (2) schools.  The recruiters, candidates,
staffers and Associates & Analysts love him.  If I had to choose one person
in the organization whom I would give an award for his dedication to and
participation in the Program, it would be Dan. )

Jim Fallon - EBS  (Jim has shown greater involvement in the Program lately.
He has interviewed on Super Saturday on several occasions and has agreed to
chair the Analyst PRC)

John Sherriff - London (There continues to be a disconnect between London and
Houston.  It would be helpful to have John actively involved.)

Thanks
Charlene


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 10:46
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com                           04/14/2000 08:37 AM

To: joemeador@aol.com, bath@dynegy.com, jesbateman@aol.com, sscott5@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Century's best pictures

 Subject: FW: Century's best pictures

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   patti@thehealthmanagementacademy.com
> [SMTP:patti@thehealthmanagementacademy.com]
> Sent:   Thursday, April 13, 2000 2:18 PM
> To:     Galeana Younger Woodson; Allison Dreeben Zeller; Raleigh Trumbo;
> Stephanie Hale; Kevin Pape; Bryan Pape; Judy Pape; Keri Moses; Josie
> Meador; Julie McSween; Tifini Kiselis; Per Huge-Jensen; Carrie Haugen;
> Brandon Grant; Boyd B. Haugen; Tamara dybala; Neal Dunn; Gina Dillard;
> Robin DeWees; Edward & Robin DeWees; Dottie Cooper; Tonya Young Bottoms;
> Haley Beckel; Jimmy Bartz; Cindy Bartz; Elizabeth Archer; Kelly Aaron;
> Gary Bisbee
> Subject:     FW: Century's best pictures
>
> Pretty cool.  Enjoy. <<FW: RE: FW: Century's best pictures>>

Message-ID: <65CDFBEFBBA8D11198E90000F6B0ACEE321455@ntascsg22.intranet.hdr>
From: "Schroller, Aimee" <ASchroll@hdrinc.com>
To: "'Kimberly (work)'" <kkeller@bracepatt.com>
Subject: FW: RE: FW: Century's best pictures
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:17:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: application/msword;  name="CENTURYBESTPICS_1.DOC"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;   filename="CENTURYBESTPICS_1.DOC"

 - CENTURYBESTPICS_1.DOC


Thomas: Can you please answer the following questions:
1. What is the NYC Gate volume that can be switched to NYH#6, NYH#2 and
Diesel ?
2. What utilities have this capability, and what is the volume per utility?
3. What is the volume outside NYC that can be switched?
4. Explain the mechanism for determining the fuel oil pricing

I was at the meeting I had to leave early, thanks Brad


Take a minute and call (800)578-7453 and listen to the greeting of the Brown
& Williamson Tobacco Company.  At the point where you are asked to select an
extension, hang up.

David Heineke
dheineke@tsteel.com <mailto:dheineke@tsteel.com>


This is for th epurposes of our conference call.

Regards,
Hollis

---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 04/18/2002
02:58 PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
04/18/2002 02:01 PM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Clear Sky/Trent Comparison

Using mean power.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 11, 2001 5:00pm through May 14, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Move vlans for EES in Enron Building
Environments Impacted:  EES in Enron Building
Purpose: Provide more capacity to the network
Backout: paste in old configs
Contact(s):  Gail Kettenbrink    713-853-4524
  Michael Huang      713-345-3201

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 15, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CPU replacement on server sennacca.
Environments Impacted:  RMS
Purpose: Replace faulty CPU that is offline.
Backout: Restore server to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission of the following servers:  intra, intra-dev, conman1,
aserv1, ardent, dbadmin
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Server no longer used.  The servers will be decommissioned or
redeployed where necessary.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   2:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Resource and OS upgrade to server fracture.
Environments Impacted:  Global company RMS  ECM
Purpose: An OS upgrade is needed to provide the disk upgrade solution.
Additionanl memory is needed as well.
Backout: Attach the old disk solution and reboot to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  ENA
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:15:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at     8:15:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:15:00 AM London
Outage:  Bounce PWRPROD1 database
Environments Impacted:  Enpower User
Purpose: Change some configuration to improve database performance
Backout: Use the old parameter file.
Contact(s):  Tantra Invedy  713 853 4304

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Quarterly Maintenance - Telephone System
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Quarterly maintenance. While voicemail nodes are being serviced (one
box at a time), a slight disruption will be experienced.
Messages will continue to be stored but will not be delivered until each node
of voicemail is back up and operational.
CMS call center management reporting will not be availalble during this
time.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard    713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Memory replacement for server electron.
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Replace faulty memory module.
Backout: Get new memory if necessary
Restart server with out memory as last resort
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Here is the draft of the needs assessment for global standards.  Please give
me your input.  Kelly is devoting 100% of her time to putting together an
access database to report these standards.

Also, here is a consolidated view of A01 for 12 /04.

Thanks

Shona


i need to move my dining room table before monday night when a sofa is getting delivered.  can you help me out sometime this w/e?  i also want to show off the scooby phone.


-----Original Message-----
From:  "JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JAMES+20L+2E+20HUEMOELLER+22+20+3CJLHUEMOE+40LLGM+2ECOM+
3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:35 PM
To: Newell, Eric; msmith1@enron.com; McCullough, Travis
Cc: Tribolet, Michael; CARL A. EKLUND; JOHN G KLAUBERG; JOHN MAAS
Subject: Memo

 - 163194.doc


Pulpex Bulletin for Tuesday, October 23, 2001

Market News:

NBSK ------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     421.00   427.00        -        -        -     -    79
Dec01     428.00   433.00   432.00   432.00   432.00     5   134
Jan02     432.00   438.50        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02     446.00   451.00   452.00   452.00   452.00   100    53
Jun02     443.00   476.00        -        -        -     -    40
Sep02     461.00   481.00        -        -        -     -    35
Dec02     480.00   497.00        -        -        -     -    15
Mar03     490.00   510.00        -        -        -     -     -

BEK -------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     402.00   412.00   408.50   408.50   408.50   100   126
Dec01     406.00   415.00   413.00   413.00   413.00     5    35
Jan02     410.00   420.00        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02     415.00   425.00        -        -        -     -     -

Settlement Prices Futures
          Today      Chg      Prev
NBSK -------------------------------
Nov01    424.00     -2.00    426.00
Dec01    432.00     +0.50    431.50
Jan02    435.50     -0.50    436.00
Mar02    448.50     +1.00    447.50
Jun02    459.50     -3.50    463.00
Sep02    471.00     -8.50    479.50
Dec02    486.00     -8.50    494.50
Mar03    501.00     -8.50    509.50

BEK --------------------------------
Nov01    408.50     -2.50    411.00
Dec01    413.00     -1.00    414.00
Jan02    415.00     -6.00    421.00
Mar02    422.00     -6.00    428.00

The above tables should ideally be viewed using Courier or other fixed fonts.
During Pulpex opening hours (0830-1600 UK Time, 0930-1700 CET),prices
are distributed on our web page: http://www.pulpex.com

If you would like someone else to receive this bulletin or to cancel your own
please mail: info@pulpex.com or fax: +44 20 7065 8941


Hi Jim,

We haven't worked with a term sheet on the equipment sales I've worked on.

Good luck,

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Benchluch, Moises
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Presentation

TJ:

Can you pls invite all traders, mid-market and originators.

There will be a presentation on Tuesday, November  21st from 3:30-5:30 pm on the  "Congestion in the transmission system for the Eastern Interconnect"

The conference room will be determined on Monday.

Thanks,

Stephen


I wanted to let everyone know that I will be leaving at noon tomorrow.

Thank you, Ricki

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winters, Ricki
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:31 AM
To:	Stern, Ellis; Buchanan, John; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Kowalke, Terry; Barnes, Caroline; Sawyer, Lisa; Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steve; Nacey, Sheila; Scott, Donna; Winters, Ricki
Cc:	Lenderman, Alicia; Lenderman, Alicia; Brown, Sharon; Garcia, Ava; Carrillo, Alma
Subject:	Staff Meeting Cancellation

Please make note that Shelley will be on vacation Tuesday February 19th.  Since Monday February 18th is a holiday, and Shelley will be out on Tuesday, this staff meeting has been cancelled.

Please forward this message onto anyone I may have missed.

Thank you,
Ricki


Thanks. I want to subcribe (see the list below).

Vince Kaminski

<listcaster@qdweb.net> on 07/10/2000 03:01:21 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Subscribe

This message has been automatically generated in response to your
mckinseyquarterly.com registration.

You requested notification about new articles in the categories
listed below. To confirm your enrollment, please reply to this
message and remove any/all characters that may preceed the
word Subscribe.

Subscribe ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE
Subscribe RETAIL
Subscribe ENVIRONMENT
Subscribe COUNTRIES
Subscribe STRATEGY
Subscribe INTERVIEWS
Subscribe FINANCIAL-INSTITUTIONS
Subscribe ENERGY
Subscribe TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Subscribe CORPORATE-FINANCE
Subscribe ELECTRONIC-COMMERCE