This is an Editorial written by an American citizen, published in
a Tampa
Newspaper. He did quite a job.

 IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT I am tired of this nation
worrying
 about whether we are offending some individual or their culture.
Since
 the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge in
patriotism
 by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks
had barely
 settled when the "politically correct" crowd began complaining
about the
 possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not
against
 immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking
a
 better life by coming to America. Our population is almost
entirely comprised of
 descendants of immigrants. However, there are a few things that
those who
 have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here,
need to
 understand. This idea of America being a multicultural community
has
 served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity.
As Americans,
 we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and
our own
 lifestyle. This culture has been developed over centuries of
struggles,
 trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have
sought
 freedom.
 We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese,
Russian, or any
 other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our
society,
 learn the language! "In God We Trust" is our national motto. This
is not some
 Christian, right wing, political slogan. We adopted this motto
because
 Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this
nation,
 and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to
display it on
 the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you
consider
 another part of the world as your new home, because God is part
of our
 culture. If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle
Sam,
 then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this
planet. We
 are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we
really don't
 care how you did things where you came from. This is OUR COUNTRY,
our
 land, and our lifestyle. Our First Amendment gives every citizen
the right to
 express his opinion and we will allow you every opportunity to do
so.
 But, once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about
our flag, our
 pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly
encourage you to
 take advantage of one other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO
LEAVE!

Please pass this along if you agree.


TD {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; }   .myWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: white; }   .myWxTitle1 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .myWxTitle2 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: 003399; }   .drkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .redWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: red; }   .blueWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: blue; }  	 .smallWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: normal; color: white; }  .smallDrkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; } 	 .categoryTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }  .bodyText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black; }  .captionText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 8pt; color: black; }  .sectionTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }
[IMAGE]
  kim's weather for 11/27/2001 Update Profile  | Unsubscribe    [IMAGE]  Local Outlook for Houston, TX           5 DAY FORECAST        Hi  Lo  Today  [IMAGE] T-Storms 70?F  52?F  Wed  [IMAGE] T-Storms 59?F  42?F  Thu  [IMAGE] Partly Cloudy 59?F  44?F  Fri  [IMAGE] Mostly Sunny 68?F  52?F  Sat  [IMAGE] Partly Cloudy 70?F  49?F      [IMAGE]              DETAILED FORECAST    Today: Cloudy with thunderstorms. High around 70F. Winds E to NE 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 60%. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch. Locally heavier amounts possible. Tonight: Cloudy with thunderstorms likely. Low near 52F. Winds N to NW 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 70%. Rainfall amounts generally a half an inch. Higher amounts possible in some storms. Tomorrow: Cloudy with thunderstorms. High near 59F. Winds NW 15 to 20 mph. Chance of precipitation 80%. Rainfall amounts near a half an inch. Heavier amounts in localized areas. Tomorrow night: Cloudy with rain likely. Low near 42F. Winds NW 10 to 15 mph. Chance of precipitation 60%. Rainfall exceeding one inch possible.           Click here for Palm   WEATHER HEADLINES   Tornadoes and blizzard conditions  A powerful storm system is bringing severe storms, heavy snow, and bitter cold to the central U.S.  [IMAGE] More details   [IMAGE]      MAPS  Doppler Radar Maps  Other Maps    CURRENT CONDITIONS AND 10 DAY FORECAST  Houston, TX   Memphis, TN  Houston, TX  Dallas, TX        IN THE SPOTLIGHT - Weather In Your Calendar  There's no easier way to keep an eye on the weather than seeing it in your calendar!   Receive a FREE rolling 5-day weather forecast delivered automatically into your electronic calendar (desktop or PDA) by Infuzer technology.  Forecasts for your chosen cities are automatically added to the top of your daily calendar, as an "all day event", and are continually updated in the background when you are online.  Select from 30,000 locations worldwide, including all US cities.    Sign up NOW!   It's FREE!    TRAVEL  What role with weather play in your travel plans? Stay on schedule with up-to-the-minute flight information, or plan your next vacation.    [IMAGE]   Daily Traveler   Rainy Weather   Vacation Planner    click to enlarge        SITE LINKS   For more information on additional topics choose from the following links:    Home and Garden  School Day  Weather In Your Calendar
 You  are receiving this e-mail because you requested The Weather Channel  to send newsletters and announcements to you at kim.ward@enron.com. If you feel that you have received this message in error, or if  you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can unsubscribe   anytime.  If you have any questions or concerns about how we use your personal  information, please read our privacy  policy .  We welcome all feedback from our members, please  send us your comments  or questions.  Copyright (c) 1995-2001, The Weather Channel Enterprises,  Inc.  [IMAGE]


Thanks for the note, and thanks, too, for taking time on both days to talk
with us.  You should hear from Lexi soon regarding the Super Saturday event.

"Brian's Mail" <bkanatzar@mail.utexas.edu> on 10/10/2000 06:16:33 PM
Please respond to "Brian's Mail" <bkanatzar@mail.utexas.edu>
To: <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the interview!

Dear Ms. Beck,
?
Just a?short note to thank you for my  interview last week.? I continue to be
impressed Enron's record of  innovation and the?talented people they hire.?
As you continue to  consider applicants for positions, I hope you will keep
me in mind.? I am  confident I can be an asset to your company.
?
??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? Sincerely,
??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? Brian Kanatzar


FYI.  Talking tomorrow am is fine.  I have a 900 conference call on another
matter; otherwise, I'm open.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           06/06/2000 04:39 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitro termination agreement

I've made some changes, which I thought I would circulate internally for
comment before sending to GE.

I left Jeff Smith a voice mail asking how the initial payment is supposed to
be split between the on and offshore contracts since this document references
payments to both.

Comments?

Kay


given that I don't even know what UAF is, I will plan to attend.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           10/05/2000 02:37 PM

To: Steve Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: UAF Presentation

Yes and Yes.  I'd like our Houston lawyers to attend the Houston presentation
and if you can do one up here, I'd like our Omaha lawyers to attend also.
Thanks.  DF

	From:  Steve Klimesh                           10/05/2000 09:38 AM

To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steve Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: UAF Presentation

For the past two months I have been visiting the GPG Operations Regional
offices giving a presentation on physical "UAF Fundamentals and Issues" .

The presentation has been very well received.  Interest is high, and numerous
questions have been raised at each meeting.  The presentation can be given in
50 minutes if questions are limited.  It has taken up to 3 hours due to the
amount of questions from the attendees.

One  focus of these meetings is to give the field staff a better
understanding of the impact  UAF has on our bottom line (TW) and  the impact
it has on our shipper costs (NNG).

Yesterday, 10/4/00 I had the opportunity to meet with several members of the
financial group in Houston to discuss UAF.  Coming out of that meeting was a
request to schedule a Houston presentation on "UAF Fundamentals".  This has
been done, and will be at 1 PM on Oct. 18, 2000. (Place yet to be determined.)

Two Questions:

Is there any interest in having me give the presentation in Omaha?????
Do you have any staff in Houston that you would like  to invite to the 10/18
presentation????

Copy of the presentation if you are interested:

Thanks  Steve  37885


Attached is a draft of Ken Lay's speech for the Power Breakfast in Toronto on
April 4.  Any comments would be appreciated.   I will be forwarding fresh
briefing materials to Kimberly Hillis for distribution.  Regards,
Aleck


well - sounds like you had a great birthday!  whats your next stop?  still
florida??


and none of them are good :-)

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FYI

With all of the HYPE surrounding the Big 12 this season....

Nine SEC teams are going to bowls, an unprecedented number of bowl-bound
teams from a single conference in NCAA history.


Justin, never got the fax could you resend it . Attached is our current
checklist of legal issues that we are incorporating into our timeline.

 Anyway if  may one more question.

 What  happens if you want to include a special condition in a
"Confirmation". Let me give an example a Goods and Services Tax will be
introduced  Australia in July 2000. We are a putting some wording in
confirmations as to what will happen if the published electricity index is
produced inclusive of GST. Clearly such a of a general  provision could
included in a revised version of the GTCs. But what happens if there is a
Master Agreement in place? Do you have to amendment to it before you can
trade?

On a more general level the more I see the more apparent it is that we should
be relying heavily on legal work already been done and merely vet it for
application to Australian laws.   Let me give an example. One area we have
identified requires work is that of establishing that EnronOnline complies
with requirements of our  Evidence Act. We are going have to establish to
potential counterparties that the system  can provide sufficient certainty as
the terms of a trade.  There must be evidence admissible in court  that  a
trade actually took place and what  version of the GTCs was were linked to a
particular product at a time.  For us to start looking at these issues from
scratch will be expensive and time consuming assuming we had a detailed
knowledge of the operation of the system. What I like to do arrange a time to
talk through your process. Are you free if I call you 10 am Thursday  ?

Justin Boyd@ECT
11/19/99 07:26 PM
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: EnronOnline Australian Legal issues

david - i've sent you something by fax.......

regards

justin

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
19/11/99 07:29
To: Justin Boyd@ECT, Edmund Cooper@ECT, Mark Taylor@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz@ECT, Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nicholas
O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: EnronOnline Australian Legal issues

Attached is the draft instructions to outside counsel to provide advice in
respect to the introduction of EnronOnline to Australia. Although I have
provided it to keep you appraised of what we are doing I appreciate any
comments you may have. Particularly the scope of issues covered.


HAVE 2100 FOR JULY.

713.853.9351


To Everyone,

Please refer to O:\Global_Cntrprty\Name Change Notification Report for all details of the final report for May, 2001.  The following overlays were done in GCP since the last distribution on 05/16/01.

Name Overlay		BP Amoco Corporation			65291		BP Corporation North America Inc.
Name Overlay		Catalytica Combustion Systems, Inc.	73545		Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc.
Name Overlay		CMS Gas Transmission & Storage Co.	68903		CMS Gas Transmission Company
Name Overlay		PanEnergy Natural Gas Corporation	54237		Duke Energy Natural Gas Corporation
Name Overlay		Southchem, Inc.				 9570		Brenntag Southeast, Inc.

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT on Friday, May 25.

Records will be inactivated on Monday, June 4.

Please call me with any questions or concerns.

Cheryl Johnson
Enron Net Works
Global Data Management
713.853.3103


Ben - Attached is a copy of my initial stab at capturing the notes from our
weeting with RPU.  I miss some of the comments in the meeting so could you
plese update with your notes. Thanks. Russ


Here's a guy I played football with that you guys should at least bring in for an interview.  He's got plenty of previous experience, and has been at some good shops.  He's a guy that would stay for the year to year and a half like we were talking about Juan.  He'd add some much needed depth to night shift until he worked up to days.  In fact, I think he went to the Austin trip last year (he's African-American, 5'11", about 220lbs).  He was at EPMC at the time.

See you guys tomorrow,

LJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Franklin, Warrick
Sent: Thu 8/2/2001 11:26 AM
To: Jester, Larry
Cc:
Subject: FW: Joe Davis-Resume

Larry,

Joe Davis asked me to forward his resume to you to pass on to Dana or whoever the appropriate people are over there in ya'lls group.  He is looking to make a move from CMS Energy.  I told him I didn't know if they were looking for any schedulers or real-time people, but you would know that better than me.  Check it out and pass it around for him.  I'll give you his home number:  281-491-3705.  He is looking for something ASAP.  Thanks

Warrick

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "Joe Davis" <killajoe85@hotmail.com>@ENRON [<mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joe+20Davis+22+20+3Ckillajoe85+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>]

Sent:   Monday, July 30, 2001 2:34 PM
To:     Franklin, Warrick
Subject:

Hey Warrick,

    What's up man? I was wondering if you guys were hiring in your Power
group. If you could put in a good word for me I would appreciate it.

Thanks,
Joe D

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp>

 - RESUME3.doc <<RESUME3.doc>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
10:10 AM ---------------------------

"Andy Katz" <AKatz@eei.org> on 02/28/2000 07:42:53 AM
Please respond to "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group"
<contract@ls.eei.org>
To: "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group" <contract@ls.eei.org>
cc:  (bcc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: CFTC

Paul Pantano clarified my earlier email about the CFTC proposal.  Sorry for
the confusion.

Andrew S. Katz, Senior Attorney
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org

Received: from mail02-ord.pilot.net (mail-ord-2.pilot.net [205.243.174.16])
by mail.eei.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:27:19 -0500
Received: from mwe.com (unknown-106-134.pilot.net [206.189.106.134] (may be
forged)) by mail02-ord.pilot.net with SMTP id HAA23507 for <akatz@eei.org>;
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:25:58 -0600 (CST)
From: ppantano@mwe.com
Received: by mwe.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6  (890.1 7-16-1999))  id
86256893.0049C2F1 ; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:25:40 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: MW&E
To: akatz@eei.org
Message-ID: <86256893.0049C1F2.00@mwe.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:25:13 -0500
Subject: CFTC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear Andy:

     I want to clarify a misunderstanding in your email to the group.  While
it
is correct that the CFTC proposes to regulate commodities with exhaustible and
nearly inexhaustible supplies differently, it has not characterized power as
having an inexhaustible supply.  In fact, I would expect the CFTC to treat
power
as having a finite supply at any given time.  This means, for example, that
power derivatives traded on a multilateral transaction execution facility
would
not qualify for exemption from the Commodity Exchange Act under the current
proposal.  I think the EEI and other industry groups should consider
attempting
to persuade the CFTC to exempt physical and derivative power contracts from
certain provisions of the CEA under the CFTC's proposal to consider exemptions
on a "case-by-case basis."  See, for example, the discussion of DTFs on pages
9
and 10 of the proposal.  I hope this clarifies the CFTC's proposal.

     Regards, Paul

Paul J. Pantano, Jr.
McDermott, Will & Emery
(202) 756-8026

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******


MTV music awards Thursday September 6th - Hopefully we get another Britney strip tease this year.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+20Laird+20+3CRLaird+40natsource+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:

Whoops I did it again,......I'm not that innocent...


uggggghhhh!!!  what a complete and utter pr--k!!  i am SO annoyed reading
that story!  so even aside from the evening with your parents (which
approaches being understandable) he never was mature at all. i don't have
anything insightful to add to this situation- he appeared so genuine and
wonderful, but deep inside, he is a Californian....i have never been
impressed with California men in general- too self important and unduly
cocky.  his loss completely, which you know.

At least you have your plane ticket to London!  I'm so excited for you- you
world traveller!  You should send out a bulk email update when you return
so that all your friends and family stay informed on your exciting
life....Some friends of mine from NYC who now live in SF are coming in town
this weekend, and we're going to a benefit party at the Zoo. should be
fun.   i thought of you also because the symphony called and invited me to
opening night of the Connoisseur Series- wish you were going to be here!

Talk to you soon.  And remember: beauty and grace is the best revenge!
Julie

At 03:16 PM 9/21/00 -0500, you wrote:
>In an effort to save a little time I'm forwarding you the email I just sent
>my friend Emily in London.  Get back to me if you would like me to expound
>on anything.  Turns out he's a real jerk.
>
>Susan
>---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
>03:14 PM ---------------------------
>
>
>Susan M Scott
>09/21/2000 02:38 PM
>
>To:   ehillegeist@hotmail.com
>cc:
>Subject:  We have closure! (well, sort-of)
>
>I'm soooo good.  The chosen path was cool, indifference.
>
>So, last night was Steak Night and with Nick and Wilson both in town we had
>a really good showing.  I got there about 7:30 with Nick, and the group's
>size swelled to about 12+ by 8:30 - 9:00.  About 8:00 I saw Kevin (Ted's
>pal - the one you meet a steak night) wandering around LW's obviously in
>search of someone.  Can you believe it?  He (Ted) knew I had organized this
>gathering - I know that because Nick is working right across from he and
>Darren and overheard Darren encouraging Ted's attendance (mind you Ted was
>not in the email distribution) - and he had the nerve to come.  Anyway,
>Kevin saw me and came over to chat.  He informed me that "our friend Ted
>should be there shortly" to which I responded, "You would know better than
>me at this point".  The subject was dropped until he felt the need to raise
>it again.  He asked if Ted and I parted on good terms/ bad terms, etc.  I
>said there really weren't any terms, I just hadn't heard a peep out of him
>for about 2 weeks.  Kevin wanted to know if I was going to break a bottle
>over Ted's head and cause a big scene.  When I said no, I think he was
>genuinely disappointed.  I said in order for me to do something like that I
>would have to care about the "loss" and that, while a week or two earlier I
>might have cared a bit more, with each passing day the "loss" seems less
>and less like much of a loss.  Kevin told me I was better-off without Ted.
>To go even further, he informed me that there is no way he would ever let a
>daughter of his date Ted nor any of his "girl-friends".  He said that while
>he thought Ted was a great guy (i.e. fun to be around, good stories, etc.)
>he wasn't good dating material.  I agreed with Kevin saying "Ted is a great
>guy, he just makes a lousy man" (don't you like that one?).  I then went on
>to say "Anyway, I'm destined for bigger and better things, right?".  Kevin:
>"Much bigger and much better."  About this time my parents showed up...the
>plot thickens.  I introduced Kevin to my parents and since both my Dad and
>Kevin were in the Navy and attended Colorado they had much to talk about.
>The two of them had probably been talking for about half an hour when
>"dum-da-dum-dum" Ted shows up.  He approaches our group because he sees
>Kevin and is forced to make eye-contact with me.  I give him a "hey" and he
>gives me the arm squeeze and a much too pleasant "how's it going?".  He
>asked what Kevin and my Dad were talking about, I told him the Navy, he
>said don't get Kevin started or you'll never shut him up...Then he walked
>away.  He never acknowledged my parents nor did he ever speak to me again
>the rest of the evening.  The beautiful thing is Kevin stays and talks with
>my Dad for another half hour and when Darren shows up he hangs out with "my
>group" for quite a while before going to join Ted.  My parents and I ate
>our steaks right behind Ted and then went back over to our group at the
>picnic table when we were finished.  It really was a great night.  I would
>almost say I was glowing (I was having so much fun with my friends and
>family and it wasn't a show for Ted's benefit...I really was having a great
>time).  So, when my parents decide to head out they walked over to
>Ted/Kevin's table to say good-bye to Kevin.  It was awesome.  Ted's sitting
>right next to Kevin while Kevin and my Dad are talking and appears to be
>actually shrinking in his chair.  Yet again no acknowledgement of my
>parents - he couldn't even make eye-contact.  I ended up staying there for
>at least another hour and then went with a few of the guys to the Ale
>House.  Needless to say I was very hung over today.  Anyway, there's the
>story...He's a complete and utter ass-hole.  So I'm done.  And no, there is
>no way he could weasel his way back in to my good graces.
>
>Now on to a fun subject, my trip to London.  I bought my ticket today ( I
>think I got hosed a little bit, but it was the cheapest ticket I could find
>- $450 before taxes).  I will arrive at Heathrow airport around 7:00 a.m.
>Friday the 6th and depart about 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday the 10th.  I'm very
>excited about the trip, I really need to get out of Houston.  I leave the
>activities in your capable hands.  ( bear in mind I will have to see Darren
>and Nick at some point).
>
>"Single again" Sue
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000 03:41 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           01/14/2000 03:28 PM

To: Ward_h@houworks.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Fun & Games

Ok.  What's the problem.  I'm bored and I need some more of those funny
e-mails.  NOTHING nasty, just funny.  Get busy please.

"Hammie Ward" <Ward_H@houworks.com> on 01/13/2000 01:55:08 PM
To: CTawnnyGlo@aol.com, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Nikki Duncan"
<Duncan_N.Northline_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Tony Forbes"
<Forbes_T.Jefferson_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Linda Hill"
<Hill_L.Jefferson_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Reginald Pierson"
<Pierson_R.Northline_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Cynthia Sanders"
<Sanders_C.Downtown_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Calvin Taylor"
<Taylor_C.Jefferson_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Cynthia Watson"
<Watson_C.Jefferson_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, "Rae Zamarippa"
<Zamarippa_R.Jefferson_PO.HW_Email@houworks.com>, Davisg@itep.org,
Rozethel.kelly@twc.state.tx.us
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Fun & Games

Received: from houhq_svrapp1.oaksgroup.com ([209.220.178.10]) by HW_3; Wed,
12 Jan 2000 14:13:58 -0600
Received: by HOUHQ_SVRAPP1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id
<CWVJBRPP>; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:09:19 -0600
Message-ID: <4D91BD0D6220D311905A0008C75B72054C78D0@HOUHQ_SVRAPP1>
From: Jennifer Bell <jennifer.bell@oaksgroup.com>
To: "'Ward_H@houworks.com'" <Ward_H@houworks.com>
Subject: FW: Fun & Games
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:09:18 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BF5D38.E872F364"

-----Original Message-----
From:  Margaret Foster
Sent: January 12, 2000 8:56 AM
To: Jennifer Bell
Subject: FW: Fun & Games

 <<Jan1st20.exe>>  <<Helpdesk.exe>>  <<Cokegift.exe>>  <<Buttons.exe>>

 - att1.htm
 - Jan1st20.exe
 - Helpdesk.exe
 - Cokegift.exe
 - Buttons.exe


Do you honestly think Tobin can be a substitute for you?

Gary Stadler
03/24/2000 01:40 PM
To: Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Virendra Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi
Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Minal Dalia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin
Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Knoblauh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denae
Umbower/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jerald
Surface/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Kent/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation

I will be out of the office the week of March 27th - March 31st.  Tobin
Carlson will assist you in my absence.

Have a great week.

Gary


Richard:

The deposition of David Wheeler resumed today in New York.? Corey Gordon of
Robins, Kaplan asked all of the questions.? I "attended" by internet; I was
able to receive live audio, video, and transcript concurrently in real time.?
Only minor problem was that I could not assert objections; the lawyers and
the technical people are now looking for a fix for this.? This technology is
definitely the waive of the future.

Most of the deposition was quite uninteresting from Enron's point of view.?
Gordon mostly went over old areas that have little relevance to us.

There was one exception.? Gordon marked an exhibit (1198) about the
underwriting fee, which shows an early allocation of the fee and suggests:

??????? (1)? Enron's fee was supposed to be $1 million, as Brian has been
saying (Later documents that state that Enron was to get 6% of $16,653,900
look like after the fact rationales for paying Enron $1 million);

??????? (2)? McDonald and NatWest were fighting over whose share of the
underwriting fee would be the source of the $1 million to be paid to Enron;
and

??????? (3)? The approximately $1.6 million fee to PaineWebber was to give
"all of the underwriters . . . access to Marcus' research report."

In addition, this exhibit prompted Wheeler to testify that Enron "was
insisting on being named to the underwriting syndicate."

??????? ??????? An excerpt of Wheeler's testimony and a copy of exhibit 1198
are attached.

Steve

 <<C810AA00.PDF>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - C810AA00.PDF


We have a sale to CES on ANR on Jan 13th - deal 149430.  The volume is 34,248
dts and the price is $2.22.
I did not Bill CES for this deal.  According to Tom Donohoe, CES owed ANR the
gas and we paid it back in January.  Tom said CES was going to pay us for
this.  Should I bill the Retail group for this?  It looks more like a
wholesale transaction.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 03:55
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/06/2000 04:19 PM
To: Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jan CES deal

There is a sale to CES for a volume of 34,248 dts, deal 149430.  It has your
name on it.  My conterpart at CES does not recognize it.  According to Unify
the downstream k# is 94946.  If you did this deal, do you remember who you
did the deal with?

Thanks.


Aslo, a few links are below.

From BusinessWeek in 1997   http://www.businessweek.com/1997/30/b353757.htm
COMMENTARY: IN THE NEW ECONOMY, THE OLD RULES STILL LIVE

            These are tough times for traditional inflation theory. A
soaring U.S. economy,
            fueled by the forces of globalization and technology, has
pushed joblessness
            down to levels not seen in decades. But consumer inflation
remains tame, and
            producer prices are actually falling. Convinced that the New
Economy can
            continue along this course, investors have bid the stock market
to new highs.

            But there's a more classical view of the economy that still
should be heeded.
            Virtually all mainstream economists say it's too early to scrap
economic theories
            that for decades have reliably predicted inflation. Ignoring
these basics is
            especially risky in a high-flying financial climate that is
sensitive to Federal
            Reserve policy decisions.

            INFLATION AND JOBS. First, a review of the Econ 101 lectures
you may
            have slept through. The topic: Phillips curve theory and the
concept of NAIRU, a
            clunky acronym for ''non-accelerating-inflation rate of
unemployment.'' Together,
            these relate joblessness and inflation--NAIRU being the jobless
rate at which
            inflation is stable. The Phillips curve/NAIRU model suggests
that inflation is
            caused by excess demand--demand beyond what available workers and
            machines can satisfy. The excess occurs when the jobless rate
dips below
            NAIRU, causing wages and inflation to accelerate. But the
process doesn't end
            there. Higher inflation reduces demand and labor markets
readjust, pushing
            joblessness back to the NAIRU level. But the inflation persists
at the higher level,
            partly because people adjust to it.

            Despite the current, unusual situation of low unemployment and
low inflation, the
            old model is alive and well among economists--and at the Fed.
''I am a strong
            and unapologetic proponent of the Phillips curve and the NAIRU
concept,'' says
            Federal Reserve Governor Laurence H. Meyer. Chairman Alan
Greenspan,
            warming to the New Economy, is less enamored. But he
appreciates the model's
            solid track record.

            The Phillips/NAIRU model has practical limitations. But
understanding those
            limits doesn't mean junking the theory. The model can still
work, but it's crucial to
            peg the level of NAIRU--a moving target. Before globalization
and technology
            pushed NAIRU below 6% a few years ago, the model had a
two-decade run as
            one of forecasters' best-performing tools. Now NAIRU may be
even lower than
            the generally accepted range of 5 1/2% to 5 3/4%.

            It can take a year or more for inflation to pick up after a gap
opens between the
            unemployment rate and NAIRU. That's why the Fed's experiment to
test the
            economy's inflationary limit is dangerous. The wider the gap,
the more inflation
            will rise--and it will not fall until the jobless rate exceeds
NAIRU. That is, until the
            Fed steps in to clamp down on the economy, thus throwing a lot
of people out of
            work.

            ECONOMIC WINDFALLS. Another consideration: The Phillips/NAIRU
            model cannot reflect good economic luck, and this U.S. business
cycle has had
            more than its share: falling oil prices, a stronger dollar, and
weaker growth among
            overseas competitors. Also, a slowdown in benefit expenditures
has curbed labor
            costs, even as wage growth has picked up--as the model predicts.

            Right now, the model does not forecast any strong pickup in
inflation. But for
            every half point the jobless rate stays below NAIRU for a year,
inflation will
            accelerate by a quarter point. And a stronger second half could
send the
            unemployment rate even lower.

            That's great--if you're seeking employment. But traditional
inflation theory says
            that, if the Fed's current gamble with tight job markets fails,
the costs of excess
            demand now will be foregone output and income later on. Even in
the New
            Economy, the old approach to gauging future inflation should
scarcely be
            ignored--it should be embraced.

            By James C. Cooper

                        Updated July 17, 1997 by bwwebmaster
              Copyright 1997, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights
reserved.
                                Terms of Use

LINKS

I) My colleague Brad DeLong has a nice multimedia demonstration.  Check out
his site, being sure to let pages run for a minute or 2:
http://econ161.berkeley.edu/multimedia/PCurve1.html

II) A British on-line model of the economy has two articles / sub-sites:
 1. Unemployment Theories - Phillips Curve - Is unemployment inflated?
http://bized.ac.uk/virtual/economy/policy/outcomes/unemployment/unempth4.htm

and  2. Inflation Worksheet - The Phillips Curve - Trading off
 unemployment and inflation
http://bized.ac.uk/virtual/economy/policy/outcomes/inflation/inflws2.htm

III) Nouriel Roubini has an overview article and additional links to the
current debate on NAIRU and limits to growth at
http://equity.stern.nyu.edu/~nroubini/NAIRU.HTM

David I. Levine                 Associate professor
Haas School of Business    ph: 510/642-1697
University of California    fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA  94720-1900                            email:
levine@haas.berkeley.edu
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/


Richard just told me that we settled PCA.  That's great news but I will miss
the opportunity to work with you.  Thanks for all your help on this matter
and I hope we get to work together again on some other matter in the near
future.


Thanks.

	Frank W Vickers@ECT
	12/29/2000 12:46 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Terry Donovan
		 Subject: Response

Jeff, we need to add some discussion focused on QF issues in California and
how resolution to certain items would enhance QF ownership and provide the
utilities with optimal performance of the QF's and perhaps encourage new
capacity development at existing QF locations.

The utilities should be motivated to enter into buyout, buydown, blend and
extend, negotiate fixed energy prices and other restructuring transactions
with the QF's.
The utilites have the ability to hedge the floating price currently being
paid to the QF's.  They should be motivated to look into these structures.
Utilities should provide some clarification to the energy prices under QF
PPA's.  There is alot of risks around SRAC and PX that affect both the
utilities and the QF owners.  It seems like resolution to that risk is
beneficial to both the utility as well as the QF.
QF's should have the ability to move excess capacity and energy into either
the market and/or to the utility.  That  would create additional economic
incentives for the QF's to run and perhaps increase their capacity.

Frank


- FLINN, DARA M.doc
 - HUSSER, SHANNA L.doc


One of Travel Agency in the Park's major phone lines has been damaged due to
downtown construction.  The line is currently being repaired with an
estimated down time of approximately 4-6 more hours.  Calls are currently
being routed to 713-853-4801 and 713-345-5164.  We will send additional
notification if this problem persists.  We apologize for any inconvenience.


fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 04:02
AM ---------------------------

Naomi Connell
06/03/2000 08:32 PM
To: Doug Imrie/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth
Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: MG Doorstep reviews

Doug

The Doorstep team will wish to visit any MG trading locations in order to do
deal testing.  In order to weed out the origination offices from trading
offices we have agreed the following approach with Brent.  You were
unanimously voted as the man to co-ordinate the effort.

1.  As there are various suitable (i.e. ex-auditors/risk controls) Enron
people visiting certain offices, they will use the standard questionnaire
(Brent should send this to you) in order to establish if the activity is of a
trading nature.  These people (so far identified) are myself (Liverpool on
Tuesday), Andy (Germany & US offices from 19th June), Lloyd Fleming (same as
Andy) & Tani Nath (Korea & Singapore next week I believe).

2.  AA are internal auditor of MG.  I have arranged with Sarah Williams to
get the MG internal audit manager to organise a meeting with you in order for
you to review the audit plans and understand what they have reviewed, whether
their internal audit includes deal testing, how they have already reviewed
(or not) the remote offices.....  You should plan to report back to Andy,
Brent & I on Friday (please could you organise the meeting).  I have the
audit report for MGL & MGMCC audit is due to start on tuesday.

3.  Once we have clarified the extent of AAs work we will assess what else
needs to happen and who to get in to the various different offices to
complete the reviews.

Many thanks

Naomi


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/18/2001 08:01 PM -----

	eserver@enron.com
	03/16/2001 08:31 AM

		 To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - February 2001-CR

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Kelly L. Kimberly
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: February 2001-CR
Report Total: $2,475.53
Amount Due Employee: $2,475.53

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


fyi.  I faxed it to David, originals being sent to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 04:17
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           06/02/2000 03:36 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com @ ENRON
cc: Mike Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Hulse/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Dual Fuel Option Availability for Enron

David:

We have executed the change order and Kay Mann is faxing it to you. I trust
you will find it in order, and would appreciate a confirmation at your
earliest convenience. Kay's extension is 713-345-7566. Thanks much.

Ben Jacoby

david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com on 05/31/2000 07:53:28 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, james.bonnett@ss.ps.ge.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: RE: Dual Fuel Option Availability for Enron

Ben,

Thanks for replying so fast.  My numbers are:

office 281-457-8444
fax 281-452-1585
cell 713-806-3908

I look forward to hearing from you.  Regards, David Davis

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com [mailto:Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 6:58 PM
To: david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: RE: Dual Fuel Option Availability

David:

We are preparing the change order and presently intend to deliver it to you
by the Friday deadline. Please provide me your telephone and fax numbers
via e-mail or you can reach me at 713-853-6173. Thanks much.

Ben Jacoby
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 06:55
PM ---------------------------

Mike Coleman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/31/2000 05:37 PM

To:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com @ ENRON
cc:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com@ENRON, mike.coleman@enron.com@ENRON,
      bruce.golden@enron.com@ENRON, chris.booth@enron.com@ENRON,
      david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com@ENRON, kathleen.clark@enron.com@ENRON,
      james.alexander@ss.ps.ge.com@ENRON
Subject:  RE: Dual Fuel Option Availability  (Document link: Ben F Jacoby)

Lee,

I've notified Ben Jacoby who will be responsible for formal notification
from ENA to proceed on the additional dual fuel units.  I'm relatively
certain that ENA wants to proceed with these, and I've advised them that GE
needs the answer this week--by Friday.

Tell David to expect to hear from Ben shortly.

Thanks!

Mike


Mike,

Just wanted to close the loop with you on this topic.  Attached is a brief
conclusion and recommendation memo that I prepared for Eric Gonzales that
sets out the issues I have previously briefly discussed with you.  I have
discussed this with Frevert who is fine with it and at his request I have
verbally advised Duke LNG of our position.  There is also a meeting scheduled
with them on June 7 that I will be attending with Mark, so I don't think the
letter referenced in the memo will be necessary at this point.

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me at X-52709.

Neal


Group-

Earlier this week, we met Tana Jones (Senior Legal Specialist) and Leslie
Hansen (Legal Counsel) with ENA (servicing ENW) to discuss the process for
executing NDAs.  Leslie will serve as in-house legal counsel for EMS while
Tana will be the Senior Legal Assistant for all documentation such as NDAs.

There are two general forms that ENW uses for NDAs.  The first form is
bilateral and used when both parties are disclosing confidential business
information.  The second is unilateral and more clearly and thoroughly
articulates Enron's interests.  The second form should be used when Enron is
the only party disclosing confidential information.

When you would like to execute an NDA with an outside party, please contact
Tana via email (tana.jones@enron.com) and carbon copy myself, providing the
following information:
 1.  Which form you would like to use
 2.  General description of the confidential information to be shared
 3.  Counterparty's legal name
 4.  Counterparty's address
 5.  Contact name at Counterparty
 6.  How/where to send NDA and appropriate information (fax or email and
number or address).

Regards,

-Dovie


Please prepare and deliver a draft Enfolio to Dick Bryan at bryan6110@email.msn.com.


Attached is revised list opening Edison Mission Marketing & Trade for
emissions.


Mark,  Attached is their proposed language.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 10:28 AM -----

	Eva Neufeld@ENRON
	08/10/2000 02:37 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec, Shonnie Daniel
		 cc: Paul Miller, Gaye Lynn Schaffart/NPNG/Enron@Enron, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hill
		 Subject: Revised

Gerald,

I received your voice-mail regarding the LOU.

Paul Miller requested that I add some definition to the term "I-80
corridor".  The following is my language for that.

"(ii) any gas transportation pipeline or transmission system in the I-80
corridor, which corridor is defined as being three (3) miles wide on each
side of I-80,"

Paul also left me a garbled voice mail regarding another point related to the
Participation Rights section.  I haven't been able to reach him to get
clarification on that.  I don't know whether this will turn out to be a
revision or not at this time.

As you mentioned there may be revisions required in the "Employee Matters"
section to comport with the offer of employment that will actually take place.


*  Heard through sources that SBX 43 (SDG&E rate freeze) was signed by the
Governor today
*  However, the Legislature's web site still doesn't reflect the signing.
*  Let me know if you hear/see more news


Hughes
Fallon
Kitchen
Lavorato
Delainey
Dietrich
Causey
McMahon
Bowen
McConnell
Shankman
Sherriff
Brown
Piper
Garland
Whalley


CERA Alert: December 13, 2000

Title: California on the Brink
CERA Knowledge Areas: Western Energy, N. American Power, N. American Gas

CALIFORNIA ON THE BRINK
The California Stalemate
California moved closer to the brink of an outage today as concerns over
credit-worthiness of buyers brought the possibility that generators would
avoid selling to the California market. While numerous factors have
contributed to the high cost of power incurred by California's utilities, the
root cause of the current crisis is a lack of new generation. The current
credit crisis and its threat to supplies could spark state action to address
the situation. The collective efforts of all market participants should be
focused on increasing generation capacity as quickly as possible.

Western power prices have skyrocketed well beyond the record levels set this
summer. Perhaps because frozen rates insulate the majority of California
consumers and companies from tangible effects of the market crisis,
regulators have been able to postpone meaningful market reforms and
significant rate increases. The California Public Utilities Commission denied
the requests of Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison to end
their rate freezes, forcing these utilities at least temporarily to finance
the costs of higher wholesale energy. This has created an unsustainable
accumulation of costs and a loss of faith in the California market.

The current credit crisis and the potential for blackouts may become the
galvanizing events that provide state regulators with a public mandate to
address the underlying structural problems in the industry. However, there is
no guarantee that these regulatory actions will expedite an effective
solution for customers and the industry as a whole. Wholesale and retail
markets that emerge from regulatory intervention are likely to remain
muddled. In the necessarily political process that will follow, it is
possible that-as has largely been the case so far-the steps taken will fail
to move the California power market toward a more enduring solution and will
instead continue to mask the underlying structural flaws.

In the six months since California's supply shortfall began plaguing Western
markets, regulators have done little to address the underlying problem.
Rather than addressing the cause of the supply shortage-establishing a market
environment that encourages timely additions of new generating capacity and
demand side responses-efforts are instead directed at trying to lay blame for
the crisis and lessen the immediate financial impact on customers. Indeed,
several actions taken thus far have served more to compound the problem by
discouraging new power plant additions. These include price caps, repeated
changes to market rules, attempts to seize generator profits, and a
challenging siting and permitting process.

Medicine Worse than the Illness
Several years of electricity demand growth and low prices in California were
accompanied by very few additions to the supply base. Regulators did not pay
adequate attention to the looming supply shortfall. The void of consensus
over the cause of the current crisis has instead been replaced by a series of
bandaid remedies that address the symptoms, but not the cause, of
California's electric market woes.*

* Challenging siting and permitting. Despite state action to better
coordinate the siting and permitting process for new power plants, power
plant developers still face high hurdles. Local community opposition alone
has struck down some key proposed facilities.

* Price caps discourage investment. State and federal proposals to cap prices
limit the attractiveness of the California wholesale power market, especially
for developers who have the option of channeling scarce capital and equipment
to more stable or more attractive markets outside the state.

* Repeated rule changes. Frequent rule changes in the ISO markets (including
the price caps) confound attempts by developers to estimate profits from new
plant development.

* Calls for refunds. Despite reports by the Power Exchange, the ISO, and the
FERC that no pattern of abuse could be found from their examination of the
California markets, state officials continue to accuse power providers of
gaming the market. Calls by state officials for refunds of generator profits
are a threat to new plant development.

* Facility inspections. Recent inspections of power plants by state officials
to verify that operators are honestly reporting the operational status of
their generating units accentuates the atmosphere of mistrust.

CERA's recent analysis suggests that merchant plant developers in the West
are not guaranteed? to make a profit. Prospects of new plant profitability
are affected by the timing and quantity of new plants, decommissioning of
older units, demand growth, and numerous other difficult-to-forecast factors.
California's regulatory actions only further cloud the assessment of
financial viability and degrade the political environment for developers
considering entering the state.

Despite efforts by the California ISO to stimulate new capacity additions in
the state with a special, limited-term capacity payment, CERA estimates that
demand growth will continue to outstrip supply additions in the West in 2001.
In addition, the existing siting and permitting process will prevent a
sufficient quantity of capacity from entering the market until 2003 at the
earliest. Therefore, three years remain before a sufficient quantity of
capacity enters service to significantly dampen prices and decrease the risk
of an outage.

The Road to Recovery
There are a number of actions that can be taken to help relieve the capacity
shortfall:

* Encourage new build. Supply must be part of the answer. This requires a
series of steps that can help facilitate new supply build. While in principal
some have been taken, such as new fast track approval, the success of these
actions can only be measured by the build itself. For now, there is still not
enough new supply coming on until 2003 to relieve supply tightness.?

* Stabilize investment climate. Utilities must have assurance that they will
ultimately be allowed to recover market costs for power. This provides the
credit worthiness needed by sellers to produce energy and to stimulate new
build.

* Move toward more balanced utility supply portfolios. One of the reasons the
pressure on customers has been so intense in California has been the absence
(and even discouragement) of diverse supply portfolios among the utilities in
the state-particularly for residential and small commercial customers. With
the market at a peak, however, now is in one sense a sub-optimal time to move
toward term contracting. Yet these contracts provide the foundation for a
series of actions-including new supply build and demand side investments. If
they end up above market, they will at least have achieved the desired effect
of knocking down prices, a fact which by itself should provide sufficient
justification for recovering the cost of these commitments.

* Encourage market mechanisms that elicit a demand response. Although
originally a feature of California's market design, most consumers are
insulated from price spikes through capped or frozen retail rates. Exposing
customers to at least some of the market price signals would encourage a
demand response.

* Encourage market mechanisms that dampen the "Boom Bust" characteristic of
the market. Whether in the form of a capacity payment, a reserve requirement,
or a minimum term portfolio requirement, the California power market needs to
move to a structure that encourages investment in new capacity when the
market is in balance rather than waiting for a shortage and price shock to
elicit new investment. Such a structure can help dampen (but not eliminate)
future price volatility.

* Avoid continuously tinkering with the market. While the market does need to
be restructured as described above, it also needs to be stable and reliable
to encourage the development of new supply as well as a robust long-term
contractual market for power in California. Continually tinkering with the
market structure-such as the three times the price cap has been shifted since
July-only serves to undermine confidence in the market. California needs to
do its best to develop a long-term solution and then let the market run its
course.

* Allow for greater environmental flexibility. The state should explore a
more balanced solution to emissions restrictions in the face of a supply
shortfall that has been exacerbated by generators that cannot operate due to
emissions restrictions.

* Free PURPA power plants to generate. Relief should be granted to PURPA
power plants that are operational, but are restricted by contract from
operating to generate only power.

**end**

This CERA Alert will be available in PDF format within 24 hours.

**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


I, along with counsel for ISDA and counsel for the Coalition of Banks and
Investment Banks, met with Chairman Rainer and CFTC staff this morning.  As
you are aware, Senator Lugar and Congressman Ewing asked us to work with the
CFTC to resolve our disagreement over how energy and other nonfinancial
commodities should be regulated.  This dispute and the even more significant
dispute over SEC-CFTC jurisdiction (the Accord) are the most significant
remaining issues with the legislation.  In that context, you may be aware
that the CFTC and SEC reported to Congress yesterday that they have not been
able to work out the Accord issues.  We were informed prior to our meeting
this morning that the House and Senate bills on CFTC reauthorization are
likely to be introduced today.  I will transmit copies as soon as I get
them.   It is my understanding that both bills do a good job for us with
respect to legal certainty for energy and other nonfinancial commodities.

In this light, we met with the CFTC and reviewed with them the attached
two-page legislative proposal.  The most significant problem that we have is
the CFTC's discomfort at providing an exclusion for bilateral, nonfinancial
transactions.  In essence, the CFTC does not want to go beyond the
recommendations of the President's Working Group.  We have continued to
insist that nonfinancial bilateral transactions be treated like financial
bilateral transactions and be carved out of CFTC jurisdiction.  Our meeting
was very cordial and the CFTC said that they would be taking our comments
into consideration.  Unfortunately, inability to get passed the bilateral
issue effectively forecloses resolution of the other issues in our outline.

Separately, we understand the CFTC is moving forward with its regulatory
relief package which they hope to publish sometime next week.  We understand
that it will be published with a 45-day comment period.

Further updates to follow.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Proposed Legislation.doc


Dear Mr. Brannvoll,

I just spoke with our Legal contact and he advised me that your Enron North
America ISDA will cover any
derivative product trading conducted with ENA. The long description for the
product will identify which
entity you are transacting with.  At which time the European office sponsors
a product, the trade would be
considered with a new counterparty and it would be necessary to obtain an
ISDA with this entity.  The ENA
ISDA would then be re-excecuted using the new counterparty name.

One contact I have made during the course of our discussion is Mr. Mark
Taylor in our Legal Department.  He has
offered his name as a contact available for calls on this matter.  His number
is 713-853-1459.

I hope that this answers your question.  Please feel free to contact myself
or Mark in any other
questions you may have.

Regards,

Camille
Clickpaper Customer Support

"Brannvoll, Frank" <Frank.Brannvoll@StoraEnso.com> on 08/24/2000 05:02:07 AM
To: "'Camille.Gerard@enron.com'" <Camille.Gerard@enron.com>
cc: "'Martin.Holmes@enron.com'" <Martin.Holmes@enron.com>

Subject: RE: Stora Enso Financial Services S.A.: Request for Information

Dear Camille
Thank You very much for your fast answer, I appreciate this a lot.
I have today spoken with Mr. Martin Holmes in your London office, and I have
now ( I hope) understood, that by dealing with Clickpaper.Com, I eventually
will have a trade with Enron North America, and as StoraEnso Financial
services is having a ISDA documentation in place these trades will then be
covered through this ISDA.

Please let me know if this is wrong.....................

Regards
Frank O. Brannvoll

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Camille.Gerard@enron.com
[mailto:Camille.Gerard@enron.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 1:59 AM
  To: frank.brannvoll@storaenso.com
  Cc: Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Martin.Holmes@enron.com; Michael.Guillory@enron.com
  Subject: Stora Enso Financial Services S.A.: Request
for Information

  Dear Mr. Brannvoll,

  We received your question today regarding the principal in
transactions on
  Clickpaper.com.

  In anwswer to your question, the principal in transactions
conducted on
  Clickpaper.com is the particular Enron entity that is making
the market in
  the particular commodity that is being traded.  Currently,
all products
  traded on Clickpaper .com are purchased or sold by Enron
North America
  Corp., a Delaware corporation that is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Enron
  Corp.  As Clickpaper.com  adds products to the trading
selection and
  expands its trading operations to additional European
countries, and as
  Enron expands its pulp and paper trading operations, we
anticipate that
  other Enron entities will be the principal in certain
transactions,
  depending upon the product and transaction.  However, we
currently
  anticipate that the principal win every transaction
conducted on
  Clickpaper.com will be a direct or indirect subsidiary of
Enron Corp.

  Please note that potential customers of Clickpaper.com are
required to be a
  party to a Master Agreement with an Enron entity, or to
agree to on-line
  General Terms and Conditions, for a particular product
before transacting
  in that product.  Those Master Agreements and General Terms
and Conditions
  identify the entity that will the principal to that
transaction.  You can
  always contact Clickpaper.com's Customer Service if you have
any particular
  question about those agreements or the entity that is
transacting in a
  particular product.

  Thank you very much for your inquiry.

  Camille Gerard
  Clickpaper.com Customer Support


-----Original Message-----
From: J. Paul Belflower [mailto:PBelflower@eaglegasmarketing.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: EAGLE GAS MARKETING COMPANY: REQUEST FOR BID

Attached is the Request for Bid (RFB) on various physical packages of
natural gas from Eagle Gas Marketing Company (Eagle), Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma.  If interested in any or all of the packages shown, we would
like to receive a bid on or before the due date Tuesday September 11,
2001.  If you do not handle bidding on a particular package, please make
sure this e-mail or the form gets to the individual in your company that
handles supply bids on the pipelines shown. Eagle is a reliable supplier
of physical natural gas in the Mid-Continent, E. Texas and S. Texas
regions.

If  you should have any questions in regards to this RFB or did not
receive the attachment (Excel spreadsheet), please contact Eagle at
(405) 557-9475 or 1-800-332-9400 Ext. 482 (Outside Oklahoma).


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041305.txt


so you guys want to come by P&C's before dinner at La Folie, or do just want to meet at the restaurant?  Be great if you could come by and have a glass of champagne first.

Best,
Jeff


Thank you!


We have put together the following list of issues for the request for
rehearing of the FERC's November 15 order.  We would appreciate your input
about whether to pursue these issues and we will still have to decide who
will write up the various issues (Alan, Bracewell, WPTF, or EPSA).  Requests
for rehearing are due on January 14, 2001.

We oppose doing away with the opportunity cost standard under the soft cap
and not establishing a standard of reasonable profit
$150 cap too low (is there any point in raising this issue again?)
Benchmarks for forward contracts - The FERC should clarify that it will not
be applying this to anything other than Cal IOU contracts.
The FERC should clarify its statement that "to the extent the IOUs' resources
exceed their load at various times, they are free to sell any surplus at
wholesale, pursuant to their Commission-filed rates schedules."  A literal
interpretation of this sentence will limit liquidity in the market and
prohibit the IOUs from taking advantage of spreads between where their
generation and load is located.  We don't care about the IOUs trading options
but we are concerned about less liquidity.
Commission's findings concerning exercise of market power (and PUC's request
for protective order) - This issue is a placeholder pending input from
Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs.
We oppose the 27-month refund period
We oppose allowing the state a role in governance (WPTF)
The FERC should not have rejected Dynegy & Reliant complaint concerning being
paid the cost of cover for exports


Shirley,

Here it comes.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
01/04/2001 02:22 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1ST CHAPTER OF TRAINING BOOK

Vince:

Several of the guys are asking for this chapter so they can read it.  Do you
have it electronically or hard copy.  I will be glad to send.  Please let me
know.

Thanks!

Shirley


The ROVAR, Sharpe Ratio, and Risk - Return graphs we began publishing last
week are now on the web-based Executive Reports Viewer, along with the VaR
Limit Usage graphs.

Regards,

Eugenio


Just sold 10,000 MMBtu per day at Dawn to MidAmerican Energy Company at $2.47 for March.  My contact at MidAmerican is Dave Evans (515-281-2698).  Dave said he was using Apr Nymx + $.05 to calculate his price.

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe
Cc: Price, Wade R.; Dickson, Stacy E.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Update

Robin and I are waiting to hear back from all of the following

company                                                contact
Reliant Energy Services Inc.                    Sue Cozad  989-687-9246  low probability
Enbridge Gas Services Inc.                      Dan White  403-508-3184  new counterparty - low probability
MidAmerican Energy Company                Dave Evans  515-281-2698  good prospect
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company    Scott Biscoe  713-230-7286  low probability

El Paso      - no interest.

Left messages with
Duke Energy Marketing Ltd.                Steve Butler  403-297-9840
TXU Energy???                                    David Jones

-----Original Message-----
From: Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Germany, Chris
Cc: Price, Wade R.
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Canada is levied on sales of gas at a delivery point in Canada and where the gas will not be exported from Canada. The buyer pays the seller the amount of the  GST which is a per cent of the purchase price.  The seller, in turn, remits the amount of the GST to the appropriate Canadian authority.  In structuring the deal, be sure that you make it clear that the Contract Price does not include the GST.   If the gas it to be exported the buyer needs to notify that the gas is "zero-rated"  so it is not subject to the GST.

Wade - Do you know who in settlements is handling GST payments?  I hope we still have someone who can do that.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Stacy
x3-5705

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject: FW: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Do you know the answer to the tax question, or at least who to ask?

Thanks,

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Tue 2/26/2002 5:46 PM
To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay
Cc: Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Opps.  Didn't mean to hit send it just yet.  Much better now.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Germany, Chris
Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:39 PM
To:     McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay

Cc:     Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject:        Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Today we discovered that ENA has 310,000 MMBtu parked with The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. (an affiliate of Enbridge Inc.) at Dawn that needs to be withdrawn by March 31, 2002.    Dan White (403-508-3184) at Enbridge faxed me their confirmation.  According to Dan, this gas was parked in May and June 2001.  Per Enbridge's confirmation, "Customer shall pay Enbridge a fee of $.22 US/MMBtu...prorated over 12 months".  The confirmation makes it clear that March withdrawals are interruptible.  Dan didn't know if ENA has paid the fee but he is letting ENA take this gas for March!!!  So far have not been able to find a deal ticket in Sitara or tagg that applies to this deal.

Tomorrow, I will get bids from some of the companies ENA has done business with in the past at Dawn.  Before I sell the gas, I will

        1.  verify the creditworthiness of the company we are selling to
        2.  make sure the company we are selling to agrees to pay us for the gas and doesn't net this with some other item.

Kay, the point we are selling the gas at is Dawn which is in Canada.  Are there any special tax issues to address?

Any comments or questions?

Listed below are some of the companies ENA has done business with at Dawn

AEP Energy Services, Inc.
Aquila Canada Corp.
BP Canada Energy Company
Cargill Energy Trading Canada, Inc.
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company
CoEnergy Trading Company
Consumers Energy Company
Consumers Gas Company Ltd., The
Coral Energy Canada Inc.
Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Dynegy Canada Marketing and Trade, a division of Dynegy Canada Inc.
El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
Engage Energy Canada L.P.
Nexen Marketing
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
Phibro Inc.
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.
TXU Energy Trading Canada Limited
WPS Energy Services, Inc.


Shirley,

Please, E-mail Christie   the phone # for 1938. She can call in.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
12/12/2000 03:21 PM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Follow-up Meeting on Wharton

The meeting has been scheduled for Friday, Dec. 15th from 1:30 - 2:30 PM
in EB1938.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks!

Shirley


For the 28th- 31st Bought from COH (deal 156477) and sold to AllEnergy (deal
156477).


Attached is the log as of 02/12/01.  If you have any comments please advise.

Regards,

Nancy


I can be deleted also.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1 [mailto:kadalia@bpa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:40 PM
To: RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
Subject:

You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
"LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
latter.

This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.


I sent this from home Tuesday night.  I'm sending it again because the phone service at my apartment complex is out due to construction so I can't tell if you received it.

Thanks
cg


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081120&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081120
Request Create Date : 1/16/02 3:14:19 PM
Requested For       : jerry.wilkens@enron.com
Resource Name       : Unlisted Desktop Application
Resource Type       : Applications


Larry, my understanding is that ESA has taken four units and that Janet
Dietrich in conversations with ESA has made four more available to ESA
subject to them getting their deal approved by the board.  So I do not
believe Enron needs to committ to additional LM units at this time.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
04:10 PM ---------------------------

Larry L Izzo@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/04/2000 11:30 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W
Delainey@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brett R
Wiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry
Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: ESA's LM 6000's

Guys, although I am hesitant to get in between ESA and ENA on this issue, my
perception is that there is some confusion; we need to sort out at the top.
Let me describe what I understand of the facts.

First, ESA is coordinating a DASH through the RAC for eight LM 6000's.

Second, ENA has a list of 24 LM 6000's; the "ready to ship date" as shown on
the following attachment; but only four of these are earmarked for ESA, as
far as I understand.

Third, GE/S&S has approached me and is willing to sell us more LM 6000's if
we need to.  The "ready to ship dates" for these new LM 6000's are between
January - March, 2001.  We could possibly get these at the current preferred
pricing (as a current contract change order).

ESA and ENA should discuss whether or not either party wants to buy some of
the new LM 6000's that are now available for delivery between January -
March, 2001.  Does ENA want to substitute any of these for LM 6000's
currently on hand and not allocated to ESA?  Is ENA earmarking four
additional LM 6000's on the attached list to ESA, and if so, which ones?  If
not, does ESA want EECC to secure any or all of the remaining units required,
which we can do quickly, off the balance sheet.

My perception is that there is confusion and not clear direction, I recommend
that both of you have a discussion and establish a clear definition of what
we are doing with the LM 6000's and whether either of you want to entertain
the purchase of the new LM 6000's.  Let me know if I can help.

LI34400


Thanks.  I don't think that there should be a fin gd swap position of 12 lots
in the mojave index column.  Please check to see how the deal was booked.

Thanks,
Mike


Date:	August 21, 2001

To:	Entergy Transmission Customers

Subject: 	Modification (REDIRECT) on a firm basis.

Effective 10:00 AM, Wednesday August 22, 2001, Entergy will begin accepting partial term REDIRECTS on a firm basis.  Entergy believes the guidelines listed below are necessary to manage the redirects on a firm basis, and successfully allow the recalled portion of the original reservation to become available for other customers to purchase. If you have any questions, please call David McNeill at 870-541-3931 or Cameron Warren at 870-543-5497.

Section 22.2 - Modification on a Firm Basis

a) As available, Entergy's transmission customers may modify the source/sink or POR/POD of confirmed firm point-to-point service on a firm basis at no additional cost per section 22.2 and Attachment 'M' of the OATT.

b) Requests to modify on a firm basis will be treated as a new request for firm service.

c) Requests to modify on a short-term firm basis must be submitted via OASIS using the REDIRECT function no later than 12:00 noon two days prior to the start of the redirected service. Requests to modify on a long-term firm basis (twelve months or longer) will be processed according to the current business practices for original long-term firm service.

d) Request to modify on a firm basis must be pre-confirmed.

e) The REDIRECT request must include the assignment number of the original request in the related reference field.

f) Requests to modify on a firm basis must specify the exact same capacity as the original request.

g) Requests to modify on a firm basis must not be for an interval of the original reservation in which a previously submitted schedule exists.

h) Requests to modify on a firm basis may be submitted in daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly service increments.

i) Requests to modify on a firm basis must be within the time interval of original reservation (the REDIRECT cannot start before the original start date or end after the original end date).

j) Upon acceptance of a REDIRECT request, the customer loses their rights to the redirected interval of the original request and Entergy will release the original reserved capacity back to the market. If the customer wishes to revert back to the original path they must submit another REDIRECT subject to the same guidelines as all other new REDIRECT requests.

k) When applicable, rollover rights will be given on the original reservation only.


Here is the latest turbine comparison sheet.  Let me know if you have any
questions.
Ben
3-7998


Great....Looking forward to it.

Jeff

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/13/2000 07:34:40 AM
To: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: December 17 - 20

Jeff -

Let's do dinner on the 17th.   I'd be happy to stop by your house for a quick
drink and tour.  I will assume 6:30 p.m. works unless I hear that this does
not
work for you. I look forward to seeing you on Sunday.

JRG

Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com on 12/13/2000 08:24:33 AM

To:   John Geresi/CIBG/TDBANK/US@TDBANK-US
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20

Yes, Love to have dinner, either the 17th or 18th--you pick.  Let's have a
drink at my house first so I can show you the digs.  Sorry I couldn't make
it...last minute schedule problems...

Jeff

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/12/2000 04:02:50 PM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  December 17 - 20

Jeff -

Jean and the boys will be heading to my parents for X-Mas on 12/17.  I am
in
Houston until the morning of the 21st, and would love to get together for
dinner
sometime during that interval.

Are you scheduled to be in town during that period?  If so give me a call
at
713.653.8207 (day) or at home at 713.522.9381.  I'll also be happy fill you
in
on what happened at the MFAH subcomittee meeting today as well.

JRG


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:29 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!

 - Evilke~1.mpe


The commercial support people that you and Hunter want to make commercial
managers.


There are two deals for Avista the are marked not to be confirmed.  Can you
check into these, and if they are not to be confirmed, put a little note as
to why or who said not to confirm them, so 6 months from now when someone
says "Why didn't you confirm this deal!"  I'll have something to jog my
memory.  (Because I will have slept between now and then!)

Deal Numbers #487050 and 487054

Thanks!


Per my VM


The Jedi swap VaR was moved from non-trading securities to trading securities.

Regards,

Eugenio


Start Date: 12/24/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122420.txt


I don't think I knew we were making a mid-week drop at the airport.  We need
to remember that as we plan where we'll be.

----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 01:23 PM -----

	"McGovern, William" <McGovernW@SEC.GOV>
	04/25/2001 08:49 AM

		 To: "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>
		 cc: "'lhayman@skadden.com'" <lhayman@skadden.com>, "'amh5h@virginia.edu'"
<amh5h@virginia.edu>, "'mlandk@aol.com'" <mlandk@aol.com>
		 Subject: Our Travel Itinerary

Mark --

Amanda and I have the following flight plans:

Friday May 11

Leave Washington  AA Flight 771 7:00 a.m.
Arrive San Juan 10:41 a.m.
Leave San Juan AA Flight 5682 1:04 p.m.
Arrive Tortola Beef Island 1:47 p.m.

Our departures are as follows:

Bill -- Tuesday May 15

2:32 p.m. AA Flight 5541 from Tortola to San Juan

Amanda -- Thursday May 17

2:32 p.m. AA Flight 5541 from Tortola to San Juan


Chris

I know I have to sign this stuff. I don't think I need the e-mails.


I am working with both Outercurve Technologies and Aether Systems on the
wireless project. I have requested proposals from both by close of business
tomorrow.

-Teresa

Louise Kitchen@ECT
06/29/2000 09:21 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: OuterCurve Technologies, Inc.

Anybody claiming this one?

From: Tana Jones on 29/06/2000 09:20
To: Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: OuterCurve Technologies, Inc.

We have received the executed Confidentiality Agreement with the referenced
Counterparty dated June 18, 2000.  Copies will be be sent Dave Samuels and
Teresa Smith.


Jeff,

Thanks for inviting me to be in the Round Table.  I think it'll be a
success.  I'm able to make it to dinner tomorrow night for the Tiger Team
deal.

Fletch

p.s.  did you close on your house yet?


Suggestions for offsite:

1)  Non Enron speakers/presenters
2)  Cabo San Lucas, The Biltmore in Coral Gables,FL, The Broadmoor in
Colorado Springs

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:29 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally
Beck/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Glen
Devries/ENRON@enronxgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Kyle
Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L
Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Carl
Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Hello everyone.

In December we decided to kill our planned offsite due to market volatility.
Louise and I would like to get everyone together offsite, probably in late
June (once Louise is back from holiday (just kidding)).  I think it's time to
go have a little fun with the group driving Enron's success.

I would like suggestions as to:

1)  Where to go.

2)  What should be the focus of the business meetings.

3)  Should we have business meetings or should we do something else (ie.
climb a mountain)?  I'm not a strong bid on climbing a mountain.

4)  And any other ideas you have.

In addition I would like to start having staff meetings about once a month.
The first one will be Friday May 11th at 2:30 p.m.  Please add this to your
schedule.  I have invited everyone who has P/L responsibility.  Portland,
Calgary and Toronto will have to be on Video or Phone conference.

Regards

John


Please send out an email reminding folks of the GE conference call tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay

Mike, Scott, Steve, Sheila, Rose, Ben, Kent, Lisa


In

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hull, Bryan
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Bass, Eric; Baumbach, David; Blanchard, Timothy; Hiemstra, Nick; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews, Reagan; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	Game Wed

Our game is at 7. Let me know if you're in.


Attached please find the form of Guarantee to be issued by TransAlta.  It
is the same form we issued to Enron for physical power transactions. If
there are any credit concerns, please call me at 403-267-7987

Maureen

(See attached file: TAC to Enron NA re TEMUS ISDA 1001.doc)

Sterling Koch   2001/10/05 03:59 PM
(Embedded image moved to file: pic20284.pcx)

To:   tana.jones@enron.com
cc:   Katalin Kiss@TransAlta, Maureen Piercey@TransAlta
Subject:  REQUEST >> ISDA Notice and Amendment

Please find attached our form of notice and amendment to the ISDA agreement
between MEGA and Enron North America (as successor to Enron Capital& Trade
Resources).   Let me know if you have any changes and we will forward
executed copies along with copies of the Merger Certificates.  THX
Sterling
403-267-6991
PS: Our credit person is Maureen Piercey 403-267-7987.
(See attached file: MEGA merger notice - Enron NA.doc)(See attached file:
Enron NA AMENDMENT - schedule - blk1.doc)

 - TAC to Enron NA re TEMUS ISDA 1001.doc
 - pic20284.pcx
 - MEGA merger notice - Enron NA.doc
 - Enron NA AMENDMENT - schedule - blk1.doc


Just a note to say Good Morning.  See you this afternoon at EOTT.
Stan


We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


I have furniture scheduled for delivery to my home today.  The delivery guys have called to confirm that they will be at my home around 4:30.  I will be leaving the office today at 3:45.  I will return to the office on tomorrow.

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 06:58 AM -----

	Sheila Tweed
	04/02/2001 03:49 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Meeting with OSHA at job site

----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 03:49 PM -----

	Thomas Ferguson/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/28/2001 11:27 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Meeting with OSHA at job site

    Bob Vergo ask that I forward this info to you.

    If you have any questions or need more info please let me know.

    my ext. 37626

    Thanks
    Tom Ferguson

 -----Original Message-----
From:  JerryCR81@aol.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-JerryCR81+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Ferguson, Thomas
Cc: TERRY@raeconcorp.com
Subject: Meeting with OSHA at job site

Thomas:
On my way back to the job site after a meeting in Dever, with Rooney
Engineering. I received a call on my cell phone from Mike White site manager
for NEPCO telling me a OSHA compliance officer was on the job site. Mike J.
Mc Williams, Mike White, and I walked the site, looked at all records and
spoke with NEPCO, CIGC and Jomax personnel. MR. Mcwilliams and I had a close
out interview meeting after the inspection. He said the job site and records
were in order and no major violation were seen with the accident or the job
site. His only comment was he saw a missing clip on a out-boom. He will issue
a report on his inspection within 6 months.
Accident reports from NEPCO, Jomax and CIGC will be forward to your office on
Thursday March 29, 2001. If you or your offfice need addtional infor. please
let know.

Jerry Odom
Enron Site Rep.


I have found a ferry that appears to be the shortest/cheapest, but still
have more investigating to do.
If you go drive from Palermo down to Messina, you can  cross to Villa San
Giovanni. About 200 km.(2 hrs)
 There are ferries every 15 minutes. The cost depends on the size of the
car, but is anywhere from 30,000
to 61,000 ITL. That is 14.00 USD to 28.00 USD. That would make your drive
farther. You can find the crossing
at the narrowest strait between Sicily and the mainland near  Reggio di
Calabria.
I'm working on hotels now. Then the cars.
Dee

Dee Espinoza
Travel Agency in the Park
1221 Lamar, ste 718
Houston, Tx 77010
713-860-1176 - direct line
713-650-7022 - fax


Alain and John,
I understand you are both planning on attending the DTI Appalachian Pool
Operators meeting in Clarksburg next week.  We are not planning to send
anyone to cover the meeting, therefore could you please provide us with a
summary of the meeting and forward copies of any pertinent information?
Thanks for your help.
Sean