TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Thursday, December 14, 2000
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================

"The presidency is more than an honor, more than an office.
It is a charge to keep."

- PRESIDENT-ELECT GEORGE W. BUSH,

Full Story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

NATIONAL
=========================

Bush Pledges to Be President for 'One Nation,' Not One
Party; Gore, Conceding, Urges Unity
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

Affirmative Action Plan Is Upheld at Michigan
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/national/14MICH.html

Discarded Tapes Checked for Los Alamos Link
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/national/14LAB.html

Modified-Crop Studies Are Called Inconclusive
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/science/14BIOT.html

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\

Get a Jump on the Holidays

Visit NYTimes.com,s special Holidays section to prepare for
the festivities. This season, our shopping sleuths give you
the scoop on where to find the best gifts. Sign up for our
shopping e-mail to get exclusive deals from our partners.
Send e-greeting cards with classic New York Times Holiday
photos or treat yourself to a screensaver.

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/holidays/?ibd
\---------------------------------------------------------/

POLITICS
=========================

Bush Pledges to Be President for 'One Nation,' Not One
Party; Gore, Conceding, Urges Unity
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

Man in the News: The 43rd President, George Walker Bush
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BMAN.html

News Analysis: The Time for Mending
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14ASSE.html

Vice President Offers to Aid Bush but Admits Disappointment
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14GORE.html

INTERNATIONAL
=========================

Putin Pardons American Spy
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Russia-US-Prisoner.html

Clinton, in Ulster, Confronts Warring Passions Head-On
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/world/14PREX.html

As Charges Mount, Heat Increases for Chirac
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/world/14FRAN.html

Russian President Arrives in Cuba
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Cuba-Russia.html

BUSINESS
=========================

When Good Drugs Go Gray
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14GRAY.html

Market Place: Cries of Alarm as Nasdaq Adds Details to Its
New Trading Plan
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14PLAC.html

F.T.C. Action on Big Merger Set for Today
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14AOL.html

New Bush Status Does Little to Fuel Sustained Rally
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14STOX.html

TECHNOLOGY
=========================

F.T.C. Action on Big Merger Set for Today
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14AOL.html

Economic Scene: Technology Rise and Fall Is as American as
the Model T
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14SCEN.html

Wearable Computers for the Working Class
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14WEAR.html

Hand-helds, Plain and Fancy
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14STAT.html

NEW YORK REGION
=========================

Graft's Legacy Will House City Museum
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14TWEE.html

Union Rebuts Claim That Teachers Aided Cheating
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14CHEA.html

After 5 Years, New Haven Drops Its Plan for a Big Mall
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14MALL.html

Two Continents, Disconnected
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14WIRE.html

SPORTS
=========================

Cowboys Can Rely on Enduring Helper
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14ANDE.html

Cowboys Add Mystery to Rivalry With Giants
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14GIAN.html

Testaverde Will Probably Play Lions
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14JETS.html

St. John's Weaknesses Are Exposed
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14STOR.html

ARTS
=========================

G_nter Grass on His New Book and His 'Strenuous Homeland'
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14GUNT.html

3 Couples, a Power Beat and a Sweet Aphrodisiac
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14AILE.html

Innovative Theater Space Is Planning an Expansion
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14SPAC.html

Casting Herself as 'Seussical' Savior, O'Donnell to Don
Cat's Hat
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14ROSI.html

OP-ED COLUMNIST
=========================

By WILLIAM SAFIRE: The Coming Together

George W. Bush, the non-loser who is president-elect, must
now begin to bring the country together.

http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/opinion/14SAFI.html

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery, change
delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign up for
other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Last One!...


Please forward your email requests to the RAC group for opening this account.  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:42 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	Prime Account Needed
Importance:	High

We urgently need to have a new prime account set up at Bear Stearns to facilitate moving the Anker Coal positions from ECI into a fair value entity.

I had forwarded this to Frank Sayre as both of you were out on Friday.  This is background information on why we need to set up the prime account for ECT Europe Investments Inc.

We have been given until the 12th to move the Anker positions to the ECT Entity.  The account will need to be fully open and funded before the positions can move.

As this is of the highest priority please let me know immediately if there will be any issue with completing paperwork by tomorrow.

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Sayre, Frank
Subject:	FW: Anker
Importance:	High

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooper, Edmund
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	Doukas, Tom
Subject:	Anker
Importance:	High

Dear Tom,

As we discussed, here are the stipulations we talked about regarding the entity to which Enron Credit Inc. can transfer the Anker stock and bonds. Those stipulations regarding the transferee entity are that it:

1. must be a US company (this is for tax reasons)
2. must be a "fair value" entity under US GAAP (accounting reasons)
3. must by an entity whose results roll up to Enron Europe Limited (account reporting purposes)
4. must be able to hold stocks and bonds viz. have a brokerage account

Of existing Enron entities, the only entity that meets 1. to 3. is ECT Europe Investments Inc. Therefore, this entity would need a brokerage account. This would appear to be the easiest (!) way in which to meet all four conditions.

As we discussed, even if we gave Bear Stearns a global Enron Corp. guaranty I do not think that ECT Europe Investments Inc. would be able to take advantage of Enron Credit Inc.'s funding arrangements unless it had further 0% risk weighted transactions held in the account.

Thanks and regards,

Edmund


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 09:45 AM -----

	Phillip K Allen@ECT
	12/22/2000 03:06 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve,

I am sending you a variety of charts with prices and operational detail.  If
you need to call with questions my home number is 713-463-8626.

As far as recommendations, here is a short list:

 1.  Examine LDC's incentive rate program.  Current methodology rewards sales
above monthly index without enough consideration of future
      replacement cost.  The result is that the LDC's sell gas that should be
injected into storage when daily prices run above the monthly index.
                    This creates a shortage in later months.

 2.  California has the storage capacity and pipeline capacity to meet
demand.  Investigate why it wasn't maximized operationally.
                      Specific questions should include:

  1.  Why in March '00-May '00  weren't total system receipts higher in order
to fill storage?

  2.  Why are there so many examples of OFO's on weekends that push away too
much gas from Socal's system.
       I believe Socal gas does an extremely poor job of forecasting their
own demand.  They repeatedly estimated they would receive       more gas than
their injection capablity, but injected far less.

 3.  Similar to the power market,  there is too much benchmarking to short
term prices.  Not enough forward hedging is done by the major
                    LDCs.  By design the customers are short at a floating
rate.  This market has been long historically.  It has been a buyers market
and the
     consumer has benefitted.

Call me if you need any more input.

Phillip


I've just learned that this is a "West" deal for the sale of the LV Co Gen
units.

This deal was described as being the same as the Intergen deal.  King &
Spalding helped me on that one, and when I thought this was an East deal I
contacted Keffer for a conflicts check (there is none).  I haven't gone to
Mark with it yet, though.

We have forms, etc for this, and I'm happy to provide whatever support I
can.  Please advise as to how you would like to proceed.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 12:39
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/27/2001 11:32 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Panda Energy

Folks:

I just got off the phone with Lee Johnson at GE. I described the overall deal
to him ("Intergen" style deal with the current 4 LV Cogen units, and a
purchase of 4 additional units as a replacement), but did not disclose that
the counterparty is Panda. Lee is totally on board, and thought this would be
a great transaction. Based on this, I think our GE risk is minimal, which
means that our primary commercial focus needs to be on making sure Panda is
prepared to transact, and if they remain as interested, making sure we
proceed with as simple a transaction as possible.

I would suggest that we have an all hands conference call to discuss the
transaction as soon as possible.

Fred-could you please contact everyone and set this up? I'm available all day
today, and tomorrow to 3 PM EST.

As soon as I get the revised proposal from Lee, I will forward it to the
group.

Regards,

Ben


Japan's Electricity Newspaper ("Denki Shimbun", the equivalent of Megawatt
Daily) has been running a series of articles about the new century.  Several
of these have focused on the power industry in the U.S.  A friend of mine ran
across one on Enron that was published on April 13 and sent it to me.  I
thought you would find it interesting.

The article focuses on EES in particular and about how we try to succeed by
being first to meet our clients' changing needs.  It also describes how we
use derivatives and risk management to reduce costs and stay competitive.
The article also briefly mentions the new office in Japan.

The most interesting thing about the article is how incredibly positive it is
about Enron.  Given what I have read and heard about how nervous the Japanese
are about deregulation of the industry, I really did not expect such praise.

Denki Shimbun also has a web site at "www.shimbun.denki.or.jp".  They have
small summaries of the important articles of the day (the site, however, is
completely in Japanese).  Another interesting site is
"www.criepi.denken.or.jp", the English home site of Japan's Central Research
Institute of Electric Power Industry (Denryoku Chuo Kenkyuujou).  The site
has many links to other English-language sites related to the power industry
in Japan.

Regards,

Eugenio


"Lessons from Elsewhere & Arriving @ Consensus"


Ken, Mark, and Greg:  a thoughtful piece regarding Dabhol by The Hindu.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leach, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:21 AM
To:	Lundstrom, Bruce; Walls Jr., Rob; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	FW: Article sent from The Hindu

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	thehindu@admin.hinduonnet.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject:	Article sent from The Hindu

An interesting article.  Could it happen?
=============================================================
This article is emailed to you by tushar s. dhruv ( tushar.dhruv@enron.com )
=============================================================
Source: The Hindu (http://www.hinduonnet.com)

Dabhol and the do nothing Government

By Prem Shankar Jha

Ever since the Vajpayee's Government came to power more than two
and a half years ago, the economy has been sliding relentlessly
into the deepest recession it has ever known. In the nine months
since December industrial growth has averaged 1.7 per cent. The
decade when it averaged 9 per cent and the months, only five
years ago, when it touched 16.2 per cent, are now but a distant
memory. Consumer demand was utterly flat before the September 11
terrorist strikes in the U.S. It has now shrunk dramatically -
vehicle sales dropped by 20 percent in September and colour TV
sets registered a growth of a measly 3 to 4 per cent. With no
demand to power it, inflation, measured by the consumer price
index, has fallen almost to zero. The share market is dead and
there is no fresh investment. Employment in the organised sector
is shrinking in absolute terms for the first time in human
memory.

In the past three years two million new job seekers have tried to
find a place, however humble, in the organised sector of the
economy but been turned away. By 2004, the number will have risen
by another three million. But Mr. Yashwant Sinha is confident
that a good monsoon will revive demand and by itself solve all of
the country's problems.

But one recent event highlights the government's paralysis more
sharply than any ream of statisitcs can ever do. This is its
failure to react to the defeat in a London Consumer court of the
Maharashtra State Electricity Boards's attempt to foil Enron's
bid to take it before an international arbitration court by
claiming that a case was pending before an Indian court
challenging the arbitration clause in the power purchase
agreement.

The London Court correctly maintained that just as a government's
international obligations as defined by the Treaty or the
agreement supercede its obligations under domestic law,
proceedings in an international court must take precedence over
those in a domestic court. The way has, therefore, been cleared
for India to face the humiliation of being dragged before an
international tribunal for a breach of it contractual
obligations.

Given the fearsome proficiency of Enron's lawyers, both those
whom they retain and those who drafted the power purchase
agreement, it is virtually a foregone conclusion that the MSEB
will lose the case. If that happens, then by a conservative
estimate, India will have to pay around $5 billion, in costs and
damages. In addition it will have to spend a little more to
complete phase II of the project. Thus in the end the project is
likely to cost not $3 billion but more like $5.2 to 5.4 billion.
For much of the year or more that this demeaning dispute has
dragged on, the Centre played ostrich and pretended that this was
simply a dispute between a State Government and a private
company, and it had no say in the matter. That pretext in any
case wore thin when New Delhi refused to honour its counter-
guarantee after the MSEB stopped paying its monthly dues. But
today it has been exposed for the hollow sham it was because
neither the MSEB nor the Maharashtra Government is even capable,
let alone willing, to pay such an enormous penalty. So the bill
will, inevitably land at the Centre's door. And that means the
taxpayer's door.

The Centre will have no option but to pay. But having done so,
will it then gift the project to the Maharashtra government? The
answer, obviously, is no. What it will be forced to do is
transfer it to the National Thermal Power Corporation to complete
and operate. But since no one can possibly run a $5 billion power
plant generating 2,100 MW of power profitably, the NTPC too will
insist on the capital value of the project being substantially
written down first. Judging from the offers that the Tata
Electric Company and the Bombay Suburban Electricity Supply
Company (BSES) were making to Enron, the written down value will
not exceed $2 billion. Thus, whichever way we look at it, the
country will end by paying for a Dabhol-size power plant ($3
billion) without getting a single watt of electricity or for that
matter anything else) in return.

None of the above criticism is intended to deny that Enron
probably did gold plate the Dabhol project once the Narasimha Rao
government agreed to price its power on a cost-plus basis. Nor is
it intended to mitigate the criticism of the Rao government that
had it only brought the Maharashtra government and more
particularly the MSEB into the negotiations from the beginning
the latter's inability under law to pay backup charges at more
than twice the rate being demanded by public sector power plants
would have been exposed long ago.

But the mistakes of the past cannot in any circumstances justify
even greater mistakes in the future. For better or for worse, the
Enron deal was struck, and it was struck not once but twice. As a
serious, responsible government that knows the importance of
honouring one's word in a world where contract is king, the
Vajpayee Government must honour the country's contractual
obligations. This does not in any way preclude its trying to
alter its terms by negotiation to avoid pitfalls that it did not
see, but by definition all future changes must be by mutual
consent.

The changes that Enron will accept and will make Dabhol's power
affordable, are known to all. As the 1995 Renegotiating Committee
and the Godbole Committee recommended, the Government should buy
the $800 million LNG regasification plant and turn it into a
separate company that can supply gas to all the current and
future users on the west coast. In fact, it could go one better
and bring in a foreign strategic partner to invest in and manage
the plant. This is entirely feasible because its installed
capacity is more than twice what Dabhol is likely to need. This
will bring down the capital cost, upon which backup charges and
cost per unit of power will be calculated, to $2.2 billion.

Second, the Central Government should buy 30 per cent of the
equity in Dabhol from the promoters. This was negotiated with the
1995 committee but the MSEB could not raise the funds to do so.
This will bring down the cost that has to be serviced in foreign
exchange to $1.9 billion and the debt portion whose servicing
represents a fixed charge in foreign exchange to $1.2 billion.

The Centre could also follow up a suggestion made by the chairman
of BSES to convert a part of the foreign exchange into rupee
debt. That will reduce further the vulnerability of electricity
tariffs to changes in the exchange rate. With the price of oil
having fallen (for India) to around $20 a barrel, these changes
will bring down the cost of Dabhol's power at 90 per cent
capacity utilisation own to below Rs. 2.40 a unit. This will make
it entirely viable, especially if Maharashtra and the
neighbouring states agree to make a marginal increase in the
average power tariff or are able to bring down power theft and
reduce subsidies to the pseudo-rural sector.

The right course for the centre even at this late stage will be
to take over the project from the MSEB, renegotiate it with
Enron, or if Enron wants to opt out, then buy the project from it
at cost and make the above structural changes on its own before
handing it over to the NTPC. Getting dragged to court will
neither solve the problem of paying for Dabhol's power nor answer
the more basic question - how can any electricity grid add new
power plants to itself without raising the average tariff it
charges for electricity.

Copyrights: 1995 - 2001 The Hindu

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly
prohibited without the consent of The Hindu


thanks Tara

-----Original Message-----
From: Exe, Tara D - TM-DITT1 [mailto:tdexe@bpa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Semperger, Cara; Rawson, Lester
Cc: Paschke, Al - TM-Ditt2; Huss, Steve - TMS
Subject: Read-Only Access to the CWI
Importance: High

Cara

I wanted to let you know you have read-only access to the CWI for viewing
your lossess, ancillary services and transmission information.  However,
when you log in now, you will need to use your current user id but your
password has been reset to default.  Type in default as your password and
then you will be prompted to enter a new password.  After you do this, you
will then have read-only capability.  If you have any questions, please let
me know.  I'm at 360.418.2009

Les

You also will have read-only access now but you will not be prompted to
change your password.  We did the change under a blanket authority so it
only requires Cara to change hers.  You should be able to continue to use
your current user id and password and be fine.  If you have any questions,
please let me know.

Thank you,

Tara Exe
BPAT


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
SOLICITOR/CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Please see the attached memo from Rob Hemstock to Steve Kean and Rick Shapiro
for your information.  The most noteable items are (a) the Power Pool
Participant Behaviour Guidelines published in March 2000, and (b) the history
of changes to the Power Pool of Alberta.

Regards, Peter Keohane
---------------------- Forwarded by Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT on 06/07/2000
10:51 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Hemstock                           06/06/2000 02:40 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Stanley - History of the Design of the Alberta Power Pool
Model

I understand your call to me yesterday was to inquire about the vision the
architects of the Power Pool of Alberta had when they were setting up the
Power Pool, and more particularly, whether they envisioned that
unsophisticated Pool Participant would be expected to obtain assistance from
other more sophisticated Pool Participants to maximize the price that it
would receive from the Power Pool for the energy it sold into the Power
Pool.    I have reviewed the some materials (i.e. AEUB Decisions, Alberta
Department of Energy documents) and have found nothing related to this.  This
is not surprising as these market design issues were considered in Alberta in
1994 and 1995, long before I arrived on the electricity scene in 1997.

I did speak to a consultant who was involved in the market design process in
the early 1990's named Jim Fitzowich.  Jim joined TransAlta in 1986 and then
worked for TransCanada Power until January 2000 when he established his
current consulting practice.  Jim became a member of the Power Pool Council
in late 1995 and stayed in that position until May 1998 when an independent
Power Pool Council was appointed.  Jim and I are both on the Board of
Directors of the Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta and I know
Jim fairly well.

Jim advised that the Alberta electricity industry design was quarterbacked by
the Deputy Minister of Energy of the day named Rick Hyndman.  Under Rick
Hyndman's direction a White Paper was apparently released in October 1994 in
which a power exchange regime modelled on the exchange regime in the U.K. was
thoroughly discussed and proposed for Alberta.   According to Jim Fitzowich,
this White Paper was the initial blueprint for the Alberta market design.  I
have met Rick Hyndman a few times and understand he left government a few
years ago and is also a consultant.  I left Rick a message to call me and I
intend to ask him to send me a copy of the White Paper and also inquire about
the nature of his consulting work.

On a related note, attached is an email I sent to Bill G and John L in March
2000 advising them of the new Power Pool Participant Behavior Guidelines that
were added to the Power Pool Rules in March 2000.  You can see the original
notice of the rule change received from the Power Pool is also attached as
are the actual Participant Behavior Guidelines (see Change 11a).  While I
appreciate the determination of whether an offence occurred under the
Competition Act would be independent of the compliance, or not, with the
Power Pool Rules, I think it is noteworthy that the Power Pool incorporated
these entirely new set of Participant Behavior Guidelines only recently, and
after the acts that are the subject of Project Stanley had occurred.

You should also be aware that there is a document on the Power Pool website
(http://www.powerpool.ab.ca/index_links.html) entitled "Summary of Power Pool
Rule Changes" that appears to list all the rule changes that have occurred
since the Power Pool began operation in 1996.

Regards,

Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 06/06/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Hemstock                           03/23/2000 12:19 PM

To: Bill Greenizan/CAL/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Attached are a number of Pool Rule Changes that I expect will be approved
today by the Power Pool Council.  The most noteworthy change is the addition
of the new Rule 2.9 - "Participant Behavior Guidelines".

The Participant Behavior Guidelines contain very broad language but are
intended to provide market participants with guidance from the Pool on the
types of activities that it considers to constitute anti-competitive
behavior.    It identifies three categories of "undesireable practices"
namely: (a) sharing of competitive information, (b) abuse of dominant
position (which includes physical or economic witholding of facilities or
energy so as to adversely impact upon the efficient, fair, and openly
competitive operation of the market), and (c) other practices including
conduct that would cause a material change in price.

In my view, this new Rule does not extend any additional powers to the Power
Pool or the Market Survelliance Administrator beyond the already broad
authority given to the MSA in Section 9.1 of the Electric Utilities Act.  It
is my sense from conversations I had with stakeholders at the IPPSA
Conference that the Power Pool's motivation behind this new Rule was to send
a message to Powerex and the PPA Owners that the Power Pool is concerned
about their market power and is/will be monitoring them.   We need to be
aware of these rules so we can mitigate the risk of our business not being
conducted within them.

It may be worthwhile for Peter and I to consolidate the relevant EUA
provisions and the Pool Rules into one reference resource for the commercial
group.

Regards,

Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 03/23/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Kayan Brown <Kayan.Brown@powerpool.ab.ca> on 03/17/2000 10:40:30 AM
To: "'jenifer@telusplanet.net'" <jenifer@telusplanet.net>,
"'pbartsch@utilicorp.com'" <pbartsch@utilicorp.com>,
"'albert.lai@atcoelectric.com'" <albert.lai@atcoelectric.com>,
"'ian.luco@atcoelectric.com'" <ian.luco@atcoelectric.com>,
"'peter.wong@atcoelectric.com'" <peter.wong@atcoelectric.com>,
"'jon.burkinshaw@atco.ca'" <jon.burkinshaw@atco.ca>, "'guido@cgeco.com'"
<guido@cgeco.com>, "'john@canhydro.com'" <john@canhydro.com>,
"'jrenter@city.lethbridge.ab.ca'" <jrenter@city.lethbridge.ab.ca>,
"'mstroh@city.lethbridge.ab.ca'" <mstroh@city.lethbridge.ab.ca>,
"'rodcro@city.medicine-hat.ab.ca'" <rodcro@city.medicine-hat.ab.ca>,
"'alr@city.red-deer.ab.ca'" <alr@city.red-deer.ab.ca>,
"'rolands_muiznieks@cdncxy.com'" <rolands_muiznieks@cdncxy.com>,
"'rvesak@prpddmi.com'" <rvesak@prpddmi.com>, "'PGSCHUBERT@dow.com'"
<PGSCHUBERT@dow.com>, "'jdpollock@duke-energy.com'"
<jdpollock@duke-energy.com>, "'dlowther@enmax.com'" <dlowther@enmax.com>,
"'rraymond@enmax.com'" <rraymond@enmax.com>, "'kwillis@enmax.com'"
<kwillis@enmax.com>, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, "'adunn@epcor-group.com'"
<adunn@epcor-group.com>, "'rob.baker@eal.ab.ca'" <rob.baker@eal.ab.ca>,
"'bobt@fcec.com'" <bobt@fcec.com>, "'ghowell@compusmart.ab.ca'"
<ghowell@compusmart.ab.ca>, "'v.mantey@mercuryelectric.com'"
<v.mantey@mercuryelectric.com>, "'eric_thompson@pancanadian.ca'"
<eric_thompson@pancanadian.ca>, "'mike.macdougall@powerex.com'"
<mike.macdougall@powerex.com>, "'jsmith@renaissance.ca'"
<jsmith@renaissance.ca>, "'gbaden@coral-energy.com'"
<gbaden@coral-energy.com>, "'bfriesen@saskpower.com'"
<bfriesen@saskpower.com>, "'billvr@telusplanet.net'"
<billvr@telusplanet.net>, "'claude_benoit@transalta.com'"
<claude_benoit@transalta.com>, "'bob_low@transalta.com'"
<bob_low@transalta.com>, "'marvin_mah@transcanada.com'"
<marvin_mah@transcanada.com>, "'bourns@greenenergy.com'"
<bourns@greenenergy.com>
cc:
Subject: Power Pool Rule and Code Changes Proposed for Council Approval

 <<Rule Changes Proposed_Mar23.doc>>   <<Rule Changes Proposed
letter_Mar23.doc>>   <<Rule Changes Proposed letter_Mar23.txt>>   <<Code
Changes Proposed_Mar23.doc>>
Attached please find a covering letter and above-noted documents including
your feedback to be presented for approval at the upcoming Council meeting
scheduled for March 23, 2000.

Please note the covering letter is in "Text Only" format and the Rule and
Code changes are in "MS Word" format, because the Rules and Code changes
would not be legible in "Text Only" format.  If you can read Text only
documents please call the Power Pool and we will fax you the attached
information instead.

Thank you.

Kayan Brown
Power Pool.

 - Rule Changes Proposed_Mar23.doc
 - Rule Changes Proposed letter_Mar23.doc
 - Rule Changes Proposed letter_Mar23.txt
 - Code Changes Proposed_Mar23.doc


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 11:00 AM -----

	William Booth <wbooth@booth-law.COM>
	07/05/2001 03:19 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Ann.Cohn@sce.com,
kmccrea@sablaw.com, mkahl@ka-pow.com, jdasovic@enron.com, William Booth
<wbooth@booth-law.COM>, drothrock@camfg.com, smutny@iepa.com,
brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com, isenberg@hmot.com,
jstewart@cmta.net, mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com, lga@mother.com,
debinorton@aol.com, cra@calretailers.com, derek.naten@roche.com,
vjw@cleanpower.org, "John R. Redding (PS, NE) (E-mail)"
<john.redding@gene.GE.com>, "Mike Florio (E-mail)" <mflorio@turn.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Bond Leg Language, etc.

Jeff and all:  I agree with your thoughts as to the need for amendments re
DA customers that have never purchased DWR power, call it amend. 1.  I also
agree with your proposal re customers that leave bundled service for direct
access service only having to pay for the costs actually incurred by DWR on
their behalf, call it amend. 2.  I think it is a stretch, however, to
propose an exemption for any customer that leaves bundled for DA by
September 1, call it amend. 3.  This appears to be inconsistent with amend.
2.  I agree with you re amend. 4, deletion of language ending DA.  Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Ann.Cohn@sce.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com; mkahl@ka-pow.com;
jdasovic@enron.com; wbooth@booth-law.com; drothrock@camfg.com;
smutny@iepa.com; brbarkovich@earthlink.net;
dominic.dimare@calchamber.com; isenberg@hmot.com; jstewart@cmta.net;
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; lga@mother.com; debinorton@aol.com;
cra@calretailers.com; derek.naten@roche.com; vjw@cleanpower.org; John R.
Redding (PS, NE) (E-mail); Mike Florio (E-mail)
Subject: Bond Leg Language, etc.

Greetings:

Hope everyone had a pleasant 4th.

I've read the respective Burton and Hertzberg language on amending AB 1X.
The Burton language looks cleaner and simpler, though there may be reasons
to include some of the Hertzberg language, too.

I'm proposing to the group the following as potential amendments to the
bond bill.  I would appreciate your feedback.  The amendments would be as
follows:

   Customers who were on Direct Access when DWR started buying power (Jan.
   17th?), and are still on Direct Access when the bill passes, should be
   exempt from paying for the bonds.

In short, customers should not be forced to pay for power twice--once from
their ESP, and once from DWR.  Since these customers receive power services
from their ESP, they never consumed DWR power in the first place and it
wouldn't be fair to require them to pay for it.

   Customers who have been utility customers since DWR started buying power
   but subsequently switched to Direct Access should only pay for power
   provided by DWR that they actually consumed, no more and no less.

For example, if a customer was a utility customer when DWR started buying
power but switched to Direct Access on May 1st, then the customer would
only be responsible for reimbursing DWR for power deliveries that took
place from Jan. 17th thru April 30th.

I believe that we agreed on these concepts during the negotiations that
took place over the past 4-5 weeks.  Or if we didn't explicitly agree
during the talks, they seem to be principles on which we ought to be able
to agree pretty easily now. And rather than leave the issue hanging, which
can create unnecessary and costly uncertainty for customers, I suggest that
we include very clear and simple legislative language in the bond bill
clarifying what customers' obligations are.  Your thoughts are appreciated.

In addition, we have talked quite a bit about providing customers with
incentives in the attempt to get California out of the energy hole that it
finds itself in.  Providing (20KW and above) customers with an incentive to
switch to Direct Access as soon as possible could 1) reduce the net short
position that the state (and ultimately consumers) have to finance, thereby
reducing spot purchases and price volatility,  2) reduce electricity
purchasing costs, and 3) reduce the burden on the state budget.

With this in mind, I'm also proposing that the group consider an amendment
to the bond bill that would exempt from bond charges any customer that
switches to Direct Access by September 1st.

Finally, it seems odd that the language directing the PUC to suspend Direct
Access is still in the bill.  If a dedicated rate component is created,
that seems to eliminate altogether the need to suspend Direct Access.  And
if that's the case, would it make sense to delete that language from the
bill?

Look forward to your comments and working with you to get support for and
passage of the "core/noncore" proposal.

Best,
Jeff
This e-mail is intended solely for use of the individual to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of
this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
original sender of this note.  Thank You.


Wednesday is out for me, but Thursday, October 18 and Friday, October 19 both work.  I will tentatively hold both days until I hear back from you.  Thanks.  --Sally

Also, great job on organizing the CHF event.  I thoroughly enjoyed it, and the people I met and the discussion that we had have certainly created a lot of food for thought.  I am in the midst of budgets this week, but will check with you next week on getting our boys together.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Marilou Schopper" <MSCHOPPER@houston.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marilou+20Schopper+22+20+3CMSCHOPPER+40houston+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October  1, 2001 4:33 PM
To:	Al Calloway (E-mail); Albert Myres (E-mail); Ann Lents (E-mail); Brian Landrum (E-mail); Craig Lieberman (E-mail); David Gochman (E-mail); E. D. Wulfe (E-mail); E. Staman Ogilvie (E-mail); Elijio Serrano (E-mail); Eugene H. Vaughan Jr. (E-mail); Frank Michel (E-mail); Fred Williams (E-mail); Gaurdie Banister (E-mail); Gene L. Locke (E-mail); James R. Royer (E-mail); Jeff Rose (E-mail); Ken Wells (E-mail); Lee Cutrone Jr. (E-mail); Lois Stark (E-mail); Massey Villarreal (E-mail); Max Castillo (E-mail); Michael Holthouse (E-mail); Milton L. Scott (E-mail); Nancy T. Chang (E-mail); Olga Moya (E-mail); Paul W. Hobby (E-mail); Randy Velarde (E-mail); Bowen Jr., Raymond; Rene Paul Joubert (E-mail); Beck, Sally; Sonceria Messiah-Jiles (E-mail); Walt Mischer Jr. (E-mail); Yolanda Londono (E-mail)
Subject:	The Center for Houston's Future -- Diversity Field Trip

From Walt Mischer and Milton Scott:

Please specify your preference (by return e-mail) for a full-day
diversity field trip.

Wednesday, October 17
Thursday, October 18
Friday, October 19

Thank you.

> Marilou A. Schopper
> Senior Vice President
> Center for Houston's Future
>
> Address:  1200 Smith, Suite 700, Houston, TX 77002-4400
> Phone: 713-844-3614
Cellular:  713-857-3506
> Fax: 713-844-0214
> E-mail: mschopper@houston.org
>
> Please learn more about us on the World Wide Web at:  www.houston.org
>
>


maine impossible to get to...next option?


i think ed sardella does that bit.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 09:39 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	10/05/2000 09:00 PM

		 To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeannie
Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Competition PR Strategy Update

So that we continue to drive our activities with our Public Affairs strategy,
we have asked Alhamd to coordinate our material and project timeline.  We are
also asking Jeanie Mandelker to take the lead in working through our
different material to put into one look and feel.

Please let Alhamd know of your activities so that we are able to better
coordinate any bottlenecks.  Also, please forward to Alhamd and Jeanie all
prior work that has been done so that they are in the loop.

Attached the original gameplan.

Jim


Jeff - Chris is on point on this issue.  He and Dan Reck have already spoken.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/14/2000
10:07 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman @ ECT                           09/13/2000 12:51 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Section 29 White Paper

I forgot to whom I should direct this sort of thing.  Can you let me know?
Thanks.   Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------

	From:  George McClellan                           09/12/2000 12:49 PM

To: Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Pack/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael F Moran/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Section 29 White Paper

I think my 9 - year old daughter could have written the attached white paper.

 Listed below are the members of the pro-synfuel lobby group.  They would
like us to join as well.  Not sure what we gain - any ideas?
---------------------- Forwarded by George McClellan/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000
06:37 PM ---------------------------

"Charles Coignard" <ccoignardmagellangroup@email.msn.com> on 09/12/2000
11:40:42 AM
To: <george.mcclellan@enron.com>
cc: <jtreptowmagellangroup@email.msn.com>
Subject: Section 29 White Paper

George,
?
Pursuant to your conversation with Jim Treptow, I  have attached the latest
draft of the white paper regarding Section 29 tax  credits.? I also faxed a
hard copy to your office in Houston.
?
The current committed participants in the group  are:
TECO Energy
Drummond Coal Sales
GE Capital
Headwaters, Inc. (Covol Technologies)
Magellan Resources Group (Pace Carbon Fuels,  LLC)
Meridian Investments
PG&E National Energy Group
WPS Resource Corp.
SCANA
?
The prospective participants are:
AIG
DQE
DTE
Koch Industries
?
CP&L and Florida Progress/Electric Fuels have  decided not to join the group
and work on the issue independently.
?
Thanks,
Charlie Coignard
Pace Carbon Fuels, LLC
703-488-9242
 - Sec29 white paper 091100.doc


AGA for 9/29/00 is 78


We are delighted to receive the great news that you will be joining
us for the 2001 FORTUNE Most Powerful Women in Business Summit to be
held at The Huntington Ritz-Carlton Hotel & Spa, Pasadena,
California - October 3-5, 2001.

     You will receive additional information over the next few weeks which
     will include a brochure, preliminary agenda, participants list, hotel
     reservation form and other information relative to the Summit.

     In an attempt to fine tune our records, kindly confirm (by returning
     this e-mail) that the information we have on file for you is correct:

     Name               Ms. Louise Kitchen
     Title              Chief Operating Officer, Enron Americas
     Company            Enron Corp.
     Address            1400 Smith Street
                        Houston, Texas 77002-7361
     Phone              713-853-3488
     Fax                713-646-2308
     e-mail             louise@enron.com
     Assistant          Tammie Schoppe
     Asst. phone
     Asst. e-mail       tammie.schoppe@enron.com

     We welcome your participation. Please do not hesitate to call or e-mail
     us with your suggestions or concerns by phone 212-522-9444, fax
     212-522-1383 or e-mail: suzanne_o'leary@timeinc.com.

     In the meantime, if we can be of any further assistance, just give a
     yell.

     Regards,

     Suzanne O'Leary
     Director, Executive Relations
     FORTUNE Conference Division


yeah...i should be.  talk to you then.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stephan, Nicholas
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 3:03 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: Hi

Susan,

Will you be around at 4pm?  I thought I would give you a call when I get home.

Nick


Well, I am sitting here in pain and bored.  Armin is having a meeting with
one of our building site architects.  the reason I'm in pain is that I
forgot to reach in HARD for the handshake...germans try to CRUSH YOUR HAND
when they shake, and unfortunately today I was wearing a ring and didn't
reach in hard 1st!  so my little finger is bruised...

What else is happening?  Write me!!!! BITTE!!!! I am so BORED!!!


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041706.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: -100.00 / Final: -98.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TRADING_SC: AEI1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 104.88 / Final: 102.88)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


The one thing I remember is that they are incredibly expensive and somewhat
troublesome
to maintain.  Depending on how old it is, I definitely  wouldn't recommend it
as your primary car.

Hope you had a good time at the wedding.  It was one of the best weekends
I've had in ages.

Talk to you soon.

Kevin


Tasha,

Back from Mexico. It was a much needed rest. Saturday sounds great but I
might only be able to stop by for the first part of the evening. Some friends
are having a house warming and I said I would stop by there as well. Send me
the details.

w/b

Chris


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Dear Alumni,

ZBT's main focus for this school year is to reconnect with our alumni.  We
will be e-mailing you periodically about events you might be interested in
attending throughout the school year.  If you know of any other alumni who
aren't receiving our e-mails, conatct us and we'll add their names to our
e-mail data base.

Thanks,
Jerone Tyler
web-master (ZBT)

ZBT to host Benefit Concert

We, the Brothers of Zeta Beta Tau, members of the Monmouth College community
wish to, in an entertaining manner, give back to the community that has thus
far supported us so well.  In order to accomplish this, the Brothers of ZBT
will host a Benefit Concert which will provide excellent entertainment for
the entire community while raising money for an important local
organization, Jamieson Center.

The Jamieson Community Center is a private, non-profit human service agency
that caters to the needs of the residents of Warren and Henderson Counties
of Illinois.  Present services offered by the Jamieson Community Center
include a Thrift Shop, emergency food pantry, emergency services, Christmas
Store and Christmas Baskets, childhood immunizations, SHARE Food Program,
meals for seniors, summer feeding services for children, Women Infants and
Children, domestic violence counseling, and much more.  Jamieson Center
provides thousands of instances of assistance each year to persons of all
ages with a variety of needs.

On November 10th Zeta Beta Tau will be holding the philanthropic event for
the Jamieson Community Center.  The ZBT Benefit Concert will be a
combination of musical performances by members of the Zeta Beta Tau
Fraternity, students and faculty members of Monmouth College.  To reserve
tickets, please call Andrew Rubia at (309) 457-3069.  Donations for Jamieson
Center will be accepted c/o Zeta Beta Tau at 318 N. 9th St., #491, Monmouth,
Illinois, 61462.  As stated before all proceeds will go to the Jamieson
Community Center.  The show is sure to be a great event!

check out our own ZBT web-site at:
http://department.monm.edu/zbt/default.htm


<<Hanson Scheduling Model_5_31_1.xls>> <<Hanson Scheduling Model_6_2_3.xls>> <<Hanson Scheduling Model_6_4.xls>>


Vicki --

I have heard recently that EES is signing up customers in Texas that "passes thru" congestion.  There may be some billing and settlement issues given ERCOT's systems.  Basically, we will not know based on our bill from ERCOT what each customer's congestion was.  I want to make sure that EES billing can determine how to charge this?

Who should I talk with?

Jim


Jeff,

I am in the office today.  Any isssues to deal with for the stagecoach?

Phillip


Dynegydirect is now available for use.  If you have any questions or
concerns, please
 contact eCare.

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com


Guys, I spoke with Mark this morning.  He is very supportive of the structure
and idea.  I had indicated that he would continue to run the producer
services business in the West but would also be part of the overall team as
we plot out strategy in the West.  He wants to stay in Denver which I think
we should be able to accomodate as long as his group stays integrated into
the overall team.  I had indicated that we would consolidate market making
into Houston and Paul Lucci could decide if he wants to continue trading or
not - if so he needs to move to Houston.

 Phillip/Barry, go ahead and start working with Mark as you develop your
plans going forward.  I will be speaking to Stephanie Miller this week and
will give the green light with her shortly.

Regards
Delainey


CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
DOMESTIC U.S.
Wednesday, January 10, 2001
****************************************

UP TO 5% SAVINGS WITH WINTER FARE SALE
Book on
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0QvCg
and save up to 5% on already low fares to select markets.   Hurry though, this
sale ends January 12, 2001

****************************************
 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
2. Featured Fares Sample Destinations
3. Continental Vacations Offers
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers
6. Sheraton, Westin, and Four Points Hotel Offers
7. Hilton Hotel Offers

****************************************
This week's specials are good for the following markets departing Saturday,
January 13 and returning on either Monday, January 15 or Tuesday, January
16, 2001.  Please see the Rules/Terms and Conditions listed at the end of
this e-mail.
****************************************

1.  CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

Purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0E3G
You can also purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials for an additional cost of $20
per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

********************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
********************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN  CLEVLAND, OH  and:

$119 - Buffalo, NY
$119 - Dayton, OH
$119 - Lansing, MI
$139 - Los Angeles, CA
$139 - Milwaukee, WI
$139 - New York  (LaGuardia only)
$139 - Raleigh Durham, NC
$119 - Rochester, NY
$119 - Washington, DC (Dulles Airport only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN  HOUSTON, TX  and:

$159 - Colorado Springs, CO
$139 - Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC
$109 - Lafayette, LA
$99 - McAllen /Rio Grand Valley, TX
$119 - Midland/Odessa, TX
$129 - Oklahoma City, OK
$139 - Raleigh Durham, NC
$139 - San Jose, CA
$139 - Washington, DC (National Airport only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN  NEW YORK/NEWARK  and:

$109 - Boston, MA
$99 - Buffalo, NY
$119 - Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC
$139 - Jacksonville, FL
$179 - Kansas City, MO
$169 - Los Angeles, CA
$129 - Norfolk, VA
$109 - Providence, RI
$129 - Richmond, VA
$89 - Rochester, NY

********************************
2.  FEATURED FARES SAMPLE DESTINATION

Choose your fare, find your flight. Or, quickly sift through all our great
featured fares by choosing a destination or origin. Be spontaneous. Get out
of town. Current Featured Fares destinations include:

 New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco,
 Austin, Seattle, and many more.

Note: Featured Fares change often. To see a regularly-updated online list
and purchase our Featured Fares, visit the website at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0uTb
(Capacity controls and other restrictions apply)

********************************
3.  CONTINENTAL VACATIONS OFFERS

Are you thinking about how you are going to plan you next vacation?  Let
Continental Airlines Vacations take the hassle out of vacation planning with
easy-to-plan travel packages that provide exciting destinations plus
memories that will last a lifetime!

Check out
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0DoAK
to see our newest addition: INTERNET ONLY SPECIALS!

********************************
4.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

This week, Alamo (R) offers great rates in the following cities. Rates
listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations
listed.  Other car types may be available. Rates are valid from Saturday,
January 12 to Tuesday, January 16, 2001.
-------------------------------
$26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$26 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$18 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$26 a day in:  Colorado Springs, CO (COS)
$18 a day in:  Washington, DC/National airport only (DCA)
$18 a day in:  Greensboro, NC (GSO)
$18 a day in:  Washington, DC/Dulles airport only (IAD)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Jacksonville, FL (JAX)
$20 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX)
$18 a day in:  Kansas City, MO (MCI)
$18 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$26 a day in:  Providence, RI (PVD)
$18 a day in:  Raleigh Durham, NC (RDU)
$20 a day in:  San Jose, CA (SJC)

To receive special Continental CO.O.L. discounted rates, simply make advance
reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your
reservation online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0EoVg or contact
Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
Alamo offers you up to 20% off their retail rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0EoWh

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
5.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL
This week, National (R) offers great rates in the following cities. Rates
listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations
listed. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid from Saturday,
January 12 to Tuesday, January 16, 2001.
------------------------------------------
$27 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$27 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$19 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$21 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$19 a day in:  Dayton, OH (DAY)
$19 a day in:  Washington, DC/National airport only (DCA)
$19 a day in:  Greensboro, NC (GSO)
$19 a day in:  Washington, DC/Dulles airport only (IAD)
$19 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$27 a day in:  Jacksonville, FL (JAX)
$21 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX)
$27 a day in:  Lafayette, LA (LFT)
$45 a day in:  New York/LaGuardia only(LGA)
$21 a day in:  Midland/Odessa, TX (MAF)
$19 a day in:  Kansas City, MO (MCI)
$27 a day in:  McAllen/Rio Grand Valley, TX (MFE)
$19 a day in:  Norfolk, VA (ORF)
$19 a day in:  Raleigh Durham, NC (RDU)
$21 a day in:  Richmond, VA (RIC)
$19 a day in:  Rochester, NY (ROC)
$21 a day in:  San Jose, CA (SJC)

To receive your special Continental Airlines CO.O.L. Travel Specials
discounted rates, simply make your reservation in advance and be sure to
request Product Code COOLUS.  Make your reservation online or contact
National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368).  Book your reservation online
at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0D7m7

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
National offers you up to 20% off their retail rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0DwDV

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
6.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND
RATES FROM WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS, ST. REGIS,
THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

Here is a sample of this weekend,s participating hotels that match
Continental,s flight destinations.  Visit our website for a complete
listing of participating hotels:

--------------------------------------
Boston, MA - The Westin Waltham - $89.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Braintree Hotel - $90.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Newton Hotel - $90.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Ferncroft Resort - $79.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Nashua Hotel - $75.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Colonial Hotel and Golf Club Boston - $79.00
Boston, MA - Sheraton Lexington Inn - $64.00

Buffalo, NY - Four Points by Sheraton Dunkirk - $51.00
Buffalo, NY - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - by the Falls - $199.00
Buffalo, NY - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - $70.85

Cleveland, OH - Sheraton Cleveland City Centre Hotel - $88.00
Cleveland, OH - Four Points by Sheraton Akron West  - $59.00

Colorado Springs, CO - Sheraton Colorado Springs Hotel - $82.00
Colorado Springs, CO - Four Points by Sheraton Denver West - $51.00

Houston, TX - The Westin Oaks - $71.00
Houston, TX - The Westin Galleria Houston - $64.00
Houston, TX - The St. Regis, Houston - $95.00

Kansas City, MO - Sheraton Suites Country Club Plaza - $77.00
Kansas City, MO - Four Points by Sheraton Kansas City Country Club Plaza -
$71.00

Los Angeles, CA - Westin Los Angeles Airport - $77.00
Los Angeles, CA - Sheraton Gateway Hotel Los Angeles International Airport -
$62.00
Los Angeles, CA - Four Points by Sheraton Los Angeles International Airport -
$57.00
Los Angeles, CA - Four Points by Sheraton Monrovia - $65.00

New York, NY - Essex House, a Westin Hotel - $227.00
New York, NY - Sheraton Russell Hotel  - $168.00
New York, NY - The St. Regis Club at the Essex House - $323.00
New York, NY - W New York- The Court - $213.00

Norfolk, VA - Sheraton Norfolk Waterside Hotel - $81.00
Norfolk, VA - Four Points by Sheraton Williamsburg Historic District - $64.34

Oklahoma City, OK - Sheraton Tulsa Hotel - $56.00

Richmond, VA - Four Points by Sheraton Williamsburg Historic District - $64.34

Rochester, NY - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - by the Falls - $199.00

San Jose, CA - Westin St. Francis - $209.00
San Jose, CA - Four Points by Sheraton Pleasanton - $58.00

Washington, DC - Sheraton Suites Alexandria - $79.00
Washington, DC - Sheraton Columbia Hotel - $71.00
Washington, DC - Sheraton Premier at Tyson,s Corner - $64.00
Washington, DC - The St. Regis, Washington DC - $205.00

Visit our site for booking these Last-Minute Weekend Rates
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0D7n8

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
7.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS ON HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available January 13-15, 2001 and are priced per
night.
--------------------------------------
Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $135    Hilton Boston Back Bay, Boston  MA    (In Back Bay
near museums, theatres, & shopping.  Walk the Freedom Trail!)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $99    Hilton Boston Logan Airport, Boston  MA    (Located at
the airport and only two(2) miles from downtown via Ted Williams Tunnel.
Offers weekend shuttle service to downtown.)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $109    Doubletree Guest Suites Boston, Boston  MA
(Ideally located on the scenic Charles River, the Doubletree Guest Suites
Boston/Cambridge is Boston's only full service luxury all suite hotel.)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $209    University Park Hotel at MIT-Cambridge, Cambridge  MA
(Doubletree Guest Suites-Waltham, which is situated in the heart of
Massachusetts' high-technology corridor, is ideal for business and leisure
travelers alike.)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $109 1/13-14, Doubletree Hotel Lowell, Lowell  MA
(Overlooking Lowell's historic canals, just a short drive to museums, outlet
malls, and much more.)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $109    Doubletree Hotel Boston-Downtown, Boston  MA
(Downtown Boston features Boston's newest Full Service Hotel.)

Airport:  Boston, Massachusetts (BOS)
Rate:     $109    Doubletree Guest Suites Boston/Waltham, Waltham  MA
(This hotels' unique location puts you close to historic Lexington and
Concord.)

Airport:  Cleveland, Ohio (CLE)
Rate:     $59    Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport, Cleveland  OH
(Just two miles from Cleveland Airport, and only 12 miles from downtown.)

Airport:  Cleveland, Ohio (CLE)
Rate:     $69    Hilton Cleveland South, Cleveland  OH    (Located 8
miles from the Rock-n-Roll Hall of Fame and downtown Cleveland.)

Airport:  Dayton, Ohio (DAY)
Rate:     $59    Doubletree Guest Suites Dayton/Miamisburg, Miamisburg
OH    (Centrally located within minutes of downtown and numerous corporate
headquarters and adjacent to the 160-store Dayton Mall.)

Airport:  Washington, DC (DCA/IAD)
Rate:     $89    Hilton McLean Tysons Corner, McLean  VA
(Free shuttle to the Metro and famous Tyson's I and II shopping.)

Airport:  Washington, DC (DCA/IAD)
Rate:     $179,  1/13-14   Hilton Washington, Washington  DC    (Hotel
is located near the Metro, central to all area attractions.)

Airport:  Washington, DC (DCA/IAD)
Rate:     $94    Hilton Springfield, Springfield  VA    (Across from
Springfield Mall; free shuttle to metro; 15 min to DC area.)

Airport:  Washington, DC (DCA/IAD)
Rate:     $79    Hilton Crystal City @ National Airport, Arlington  VA
(Free airport shuttle, located five minutes from the sights of DC.)

Airport:  Washington, DC (DCA/IAD)
Rate:     $89    Hilton Alexandria Mark Center, Alexandria  VA
(Located in the West End of historic Alexandria, Virginia.)

Airport:  Newark, New Jersey (EWR)
Rate:     $199    Hilton Newark Airport, Elizabeth  NJ    (Free airport
shuttle, 5 minutes from New Jersey Performing Arts Center.)

Airport:  Newark, New Jersey (EWR)
Rate:     $2, $149, 1/13-15, Doubletree Hotel & Executive Meeting Center
Somerset  NJ    (Centrally located in New Jersey in one of America's
most dynamic corporate communities.)

Airport:  Newark, New Jersey (EWR)
Rate:     $169    Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City  NJ
(The Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City features a fitness room, and
complimentary shuttle to local businesses.)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $129    Hilton Hasbrouck Heights, Hasbrouck Heights  NJ
(Located just 4 miles from the Meadowlands Sports Complex and 9 miles from
New York City!)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $79    Hilton Parsippany, Parsippany  NJ    (Only 3 miles from
downtown Morristown & 25 miles from New York City.)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $109    Hilton Fort Lee George Washington Bridge, Fort Lee  NJ
(10 miles from Manhattan's Broadway Theaters & Empire State Building.)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $299    Hilton Short Hills, Short Hills  NJ    (Deluxe
accommodations in New Jersey's only 5 diamond luxury hotel.)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $135    Millennium Hilton Next to the World Trade Center, New
York  NY    (Downtown Manhattan, near Statue of Liberty, China Town, & Ellis
Island.)

Airport:  Newark, NJ & New York,s LaGuardia (EWR/LGA)
Rate:     $189    Hilton East Brunswick, East Brunswick  NJ    (In
central New Jersey (40 min from NYC) Princeton & Rutgers Universities.)

Airport:  Intercontinental Airport Houston, Texas (IAH)
Rate:     $88    Hilton Houston Hobby Airport, Houston  TX    (Across
from Hobby Airport (free shuttle) - near Astroworld, NASA and racetracks.)

|Airport: Intercontinental Airport Houston, Texas (IAH)
Rate:     $99    Hilton Houston Southwest, Houston  TX    (Only 9 miles
from downtown Houston, Free shuttle to the Galleria Mall.)

|Airport: Intercontinental Airport Houston, Texas (IAH)
Rate:     $155    Hilton Houston Plaza, Houston  TX    (Located in
fashionable West University near Houston's cultural district.)

Airport:  Intercontinental Airport Houston, Texas (IAH)
Rate:     $165    Doubletree Hotel Houston-Post Oak, Houston  TX
(Located in the heart of Uptown Houston Business district and 2 blocks from
the Galleria Mall.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $99    Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San Pedro  CA
(Minutes away from the Queen Mary, shopping and walking distance to beach.)

Airport: Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $84, 1/13-14,  Hilton Woodland Hills & Towers, Woodland Hills
CA    (Located 25 miles west of downtown LA, driving distance to Universal
Studios.)

Airport: Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $99, 1/13-14,  Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport, Irvine  CA
(Located 30 miles from LAX on the border of Irvine & Newport Beach.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $105    Hilton Los Angeles Airport, Los Angeles  CA    (Near
Disneyland, Beverly Hills, Hollywood and Southern CA beaches.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $99    Hilton Suites Anaheim/Orange, Orange  CA    (An all
suite hotel offering cooked to order breakfast and evening beverage
reception!)

|Airport: Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $179    Hilton Pasadena, Pasadena  CA    (This hotel offers
views of beautiful San Gabriel Mountains, within eight miles from Old Town
Pasadena.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $119    Hilton Burbank Airport & Convention Center, Burbank
CA    (Free shuttle to Universal Studios Hollywood & Media City Center Mall.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $169    Hilton Glendale, Glendale  CA    (Situated just
walking distance from downtown Glendale and all major businesses in the
area.)

Airport:  Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $78    Doubletree Hotel Anaheim/Orange County, Orange  CA
(Close to Southern California's major metro areas, business center, and
world famous tourist attractions.)

Airport: Los Angeles, California (LAX)
Rate:     $149    Doubletree Hotel Pasadena-Plaza Las Fuentes, Pasadena
CA    (Only 6 miles to the LA Arboretum, 5 miles to the LA Zoo and easy
access to NBC and Univeral Studios!)

Airport: Kansas City, Missouri (MCI)
Rate:     $119    Hilton Kansas City Airport, Kansas City  MO
(Located 20 minutes from riverboat casinos and Downtown Kansas City.)

Airport: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (OKC)
Rate:     $89    Hilton Oklahoma City Northwest, Oklahoma City  OK
(Located in the hub of Oklahoma City's growing northwest business district.)

Airport:  Norfolk, Virginia (ORF)
Rate:     $59, 1/13-14,   Hilton Norfolk Airport, Norfolk  VA    (Near
historic Williamsburg, beautiful beaches, & world's largest naval base.)

Airport: Richmond, Virginia (RIC)
Rate:     $89, 1/13-14,  Hilton Richmond Airport, Sandston  VA    (Near
Busch Gardens, Aviation Museum and the Museum of the Confederacy.  Colonial
Williamsburg is 40 minutes away)

Airport:  San Jose, California (SJC)
Rate:     $84, 1/13-14,  Hilton Garden Inn San Mateo, San Mateo  CA
(Located in the center of the San Francisco Bay Peninsula in San Mateo
County at Bridgepoint Center)

Airport:  San Jose, California (SJC)
Rate:     $249    Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View, Mountain View  CA
(In the midst of Silicon Valley, NASA Ames Research Center, the U.S. Space
Camp & Stanford University are within 15 mins.)

Airport: San Jose, California (SJC)
Rate:     $89    Hilton Monterey, Monterey  CA    (Located downtown, 1
mile to the beach, 2 miles from Cannery Row)

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0B3zF

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to
availability.  Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family
Hotel.

Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these
rates.

****************************************
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up
to $12 depending on routing, are not included. Up to Three dollars per
segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable
International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $88, varying by
destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency
exchange rate at the time of purchase.
For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0Ebnr

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST),
other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment
fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as
CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet
standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under
age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at
some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if
you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly
rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend
rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned
before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance
reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability
is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer
not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible
for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and
Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other
special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject
to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required.
Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based
on
single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional
Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate
quoted.
Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon
with
a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming
weekend only (01/05/2001 to 01/08/2001.) Offer available only by making
reservations via the internet. A limited number of rooms may be available at
these rates.
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0FG2R

---------------------------------------
This E-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly
prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO:
mailto:eservice@coair.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find CO.O.L. Travel Specials a valuable source of
information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this
opportunity, please let us know by visiting the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page
on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0BtI

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCws0BevJT0Ow0Cc1


Gentlemen,

I have made the revisions to paragraphs 16 and 22 as suggested.  I have also
changed the state designation of the Tarheel notary to Texas.

If this version is acceptable, we will execute originals and forward to you.
Do you need more than one original for the optionor?

Thank you,

Kay


Oh fine day!

You have sent my heart soaring with news that you have agreed to receive
some of this Fool's earnestly penned electronic missives!

I hope you will find my correspondence entrancing but I shall be honest:
what these notes occasionally lack in charm they make up for in
convenience and persistence. The word passed along to me is that you have
elected to receive the following note(s):

FoolWatch
Breakfast with the Fool
Investing Basics
Fresh Stuff
Special Offers From The Motley Fool

I shall do my best to make sure the letters are dispatched with both
substance and speed. Shall you ever change your mind and decide to select
more notes or (gasp!) fewer, simply click the link below and you shall be
transported to a page where you can change your choices.

http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/emailenter.htm

Looking forward to our pen pal relationship. :-)

Foolishly,
Will Somers
Chief Jester-in-Residence

P.S. 'Twill be one day before your first letter arrives.

P.P.S. If you believe that this email was sent to you in error (perhaps
by someone with careless fingers?) and you don't wish to receive these
free newsletters, please drop a note to unsubscribe@fool.com.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <ESC1000860532901_1000838718712@in.roving.com>
Received: from  rly-yg03.mx.aol.com (rly-yg03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.3]) by air-yg05.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINYG56-1214000503; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:05:03 -0500
Received: from  ccdmnn1.roving.com (ccdmnn1.roving.com [208.198.98.11]) by rly-yg03.mx.aol.com (v83.18) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYG34-1214000453; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:04:53 -0500
Received: from lp1 (unknown [10.20.40.148])	by ccdmnn1.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9161F940	for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:13:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <-604307879.1008306255109.JavaMail.administrator@lp1>
From: The Power Marketing Association <info@pmaconference.com>
Reply-To: info@pmaconference.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Free Trial-- Audio Briefings for Power Marketers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Roving-Queued: 20011214 00:04.14937
X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 4.1.Patch65.ThingOne_p65_12_07_01 (http://www.constantcontact.com)
X-Roving-ID: 1000860532901
X-Return-Path-Hint: ESC1000860532901_1000838718712@in.roving.com
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:13:15 -0500 (EST)

Visit our Subscription Center to edit  your interests or unsubscribe .
View our privacy policy .


Reference for future months.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000 01:16 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           01/05/2000 09:26 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bennett Kaufman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vacation, floating holiday request

Sally, Gary,

I would like the following vacation time off:
Monday, Jan 10th (changed from Jan 11th)
February 21-25
March 15 - 17

Thanks. Sheila


In his comments, Hoecker asks Congress to give FERC retroactive refund
authority.  By the way this article is wrong about the refund effective
date.  The current refund effective date is 60 days from the date FERC's
order was published in the Federal Register.  It was pushed on August 30, so
if in a future order the Commission were to require refunds, they would be
calculated beginning October 29th.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 11:43 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
10/05/2000 07:51 AM

To: <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>, <cfi1@tca-us.com>
cc:
Subject: Electric Power Plus Article re FERC Chairman Hoecker's Congressional
Testimony

Law changes needed for retroactive refunds

FERC'S Hoecker Asks Congress For Broader Authority
_______________________________________________
Date: October 2, 2000 -

FERC Chairman James Hoecker (D) told a congressional panel that the
commission needs retroactive ratemaking authority to better guard against
market power in a competitive environment. Hoecker also urged the congressmen
to give the commission broader authority to sufficiently oversee the utility
industry's transition to competition.

Hoecker's plea to Congress may not be a welcomed one for California, where
some state officials want the commission to order refunds to customers after
prices in the wholesale market skyrocketed to unprecedented levels this
summer. Although Hoecker has informed California that the commission will
consider refunds as a part of its larger investigation into the state's bulk
power markets, it is clear that currently, the commission does not have that
authority to do so retroactively.

"The [Federal Power Act] would have to be changed," a FERC staffer says.

For its own study -- which began in August -- Hoecker claimed that the
commission, if proven necessary, would consider ordering refunds if market
participants were indeed price gouging. However, the Federal Power Act (FPA)
-- the law that gives the commission much of its authority -- does not
consider retroactive refund authority and clarification of that law is
probably needed to see if the commission can do that.

"If we need to fix market rules or market structures within our jurisdiction,
we will do so," Hoecker told the House Committee on Government Reform Sept.
21. "If market power is being exercised, we will respond accordingly, by
revoking or modifying market-based rates or reassuring the basis upon which
we grant them. We may order refunds to the extent allowed by the FPA, if
refunds are justified by record evidence. However, the FPA defines the
commission's authority, and leaves responsibility for many helpful measures
with California (and other states)."

Currently, the FPA allows the commission to issue refunds for transactions
made 60 days after the commission initiates an investigation, which in this
case would be Oct. 13. However, the law makes no mention of retroactive
ratemaking, and FERC officials admit that to do so, the law needs to be
changed.

"Based upon what I know, the authority of the commission to issue refunds for
any period before 60 days following our [investigation] order is highly
problematic," Commissioner William Massey (D) told Electric Power Alert.
"There are very good arguments that if FERC would try to do that, it would be
unlawful and we would need legislation to do that."

The Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN), held a
mid-afternoon Sept. 21 hearing to gauge what is being predicted to be a
severe energy crisis this winter. The committee heard testimony from Hoecker,
Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator Carol Browner.

Much of the hearing focused on natural gas and oil markets, but both
Richardson and Hoecker used the meeting as a forum to blast Congress for
failing to pass comprehensive restructuring legislation this year. Richardson
expressed his "disappointment" that nothing passed, while Hoecker claimed
that FERC needs broader authority if it is to guard against market power.

"Congress should place all electric transmission in the continental United
States under the same rules for non-discriminatory open access and comparable
service," Hoecker said. "The commission's open access rules are not binding
on the part of the nation's transmission system . . . owned or controlled by
entities other than public utilities. Open access over the facilities of
public power and other non-public utilities would promote greater competition
in wholesale markets, by expanding trading opportunities for wholesale buyers
and sellers."

Hoecker pointed to FERC's investigation into bulk power markets and
California's energy crisis and claimed that unless the commission receives
clear legislative direction, FERC will extremely limited in what it could do
to solve the market problems.

"Congress, too, has a role to play in ensuring that consumers are able to
obtain the energy they need at reasonable prices," Hoecker said. "Most
critically, events this summer demonstrate the urgency of enacting
electricity legislation to help resolve remaining impediments to competition.
Federal legislation can establish the ground rules that will lead to adequate
investment in generation and transmission facilities, and higher levels of
reliability which is crucial to the digital economy."

The chairman also urged Congress to give FERC the authority to mandate
regional transmission organization participation and mandate reliability
standards. Currently, the House is considering a bill that would make the
commission a federal backstop for reliability, but most congressional sources
do not expect the bill to pass (see related story).

_source: Electric Power Alert
_date: October 2, 2000
_issue: Vol. 10, No. 20
_title: FERC's Hoecker Asks Congress For Broader Authority
, Inside Washington Publishers


people are pretty upset todya.  they have completely fleeced us.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hal Lenhart <Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Jesse

That is pathetic.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu
Subject: RE: Jesse

so everyone is pretty pissed over here b/c there is a report that ken lay
will get $80 million if he doesn't join the new company.  he is getting a
golden parachutte for ruining the company.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Hal Lenhart <Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:34 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE: Jesse

   Oh man, where does that guy come from. It would be nice if he went out
   and
   got his first job.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:16 AM
   To: hfl@fp.edu
   Subject: FW: Jesse

   now i know something will get done.

   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:      Hull, Bryan
   > Sent:      Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:06 AM
   > To:   Bass, Eric; Blanchard, Timothy; Lenhart, Matthew; Landry, Chad
   > Subject:   Jesse
   >
   > If there was ever a reason to re-think employment at
   > Enron/Dynegy.....here it is:
   >
   > http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1129874

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Thanks for the update!


FYI----------Here are the latest cuts:

6/16   Richardson on Oasis at El Paso
 97J4    was 6.0 now 5.385  (cut of 615)

 Burlington on Oasis at El Paso
 97J4 was 15.0  now13.461  (cut of 1.539)

 Exxon on Oasis at El Paso
 9J49 was 3.5   now  3.286  (cut of 214)

6/17 201K cut on Oasis at PG&E Waha
 WHO34  was 12.110   now 10.831   (cut of 1.279)

6/18 201K cut on Oasis at PG&E W
 WHO34  was 12.110  now 10.166   (cut of 1.944)


Done

esimien@nisource.com on 04/24/2001 09:51:01 AM
To:	"        -         *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

Chris,

Please fax the support sent to you on this.  I will contact Cindy Wernecke once
I receive your fax.

Thanks,


Jason:  Attached for your review please find a black-lined copy of the
FPL-Enron ISDA master agreement marked to show changes from your last
draft.  Also attached are the credit support annex, form of LOC and
form of guaranty with our changes to your initial drafts.  The changes
in this set of drafts are light in the master, a little heavier in the
annex and heaviest with respect to the proposed guaranty.  Please
provide us with your comments or approval of the enclosed drafts.
Regards, -Serge

Serge G. Martin
smartin@steelhector.com
Steel Hector & Davis LLP
200 South Biscayne Blvd.
Miami, Florida 33131-2398
(305) 577-7097 voice
(305) 577-7001 fax

 - 570710_4.DOC
 - 603603_1.DOC


Bill Hederman asked me to send you the details of a conference call scheduled
for 5:30 EDT today.

To access MeetingPlace, Columbia's meet-me conference call facility, dial,
1-800-832-3242.
Press Option 3 to access MeetingPlace.
Meeting ID is: 1234

Thanks. Let me know if you have any questions.
Katherine Lietzan, 703-227-3301


Start Date: 10/29/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102921.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/29/01
  TRADING_SC: EPPS
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Here is Staff's first set of data requests to the California Generator  Group.
 - datarequest 1 to calgen-tranen.wpd


[IMAGE] Your best place on the web to get free stuff. now.   Do you want memolink.com to give you free gift certificates to places like: [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  If so, sign up for memolink.com. It's free. It's easy. It's free stuff. Now.     [IMAGE]


Leon,  I received a phone call from out in the blue
from Asif Hasan.  Asif was Mr. Herring's personal
assistant in the early eighties or maybe even the last
seventies.  Of course I mentioned the HNG Alumni to
Asif and said I would get him on the mailing list.
His contact information is:

22461 Gravino
Laguna Hills, CA  92653
stocknfund@aol.com
(949)699-6690

He had asked about Gilbert Lafuente and Eddie Garza
and I informed him that they had passed away.  I
couldn't remember all the history from your emails
over the last few years to tell him what has happened.
 Do you keep a log that can be sent out to Asif?
May God bless everyone this holiday season.

Lonnie
--- Leon Ullrich <rlu53@hal-pc.org> wrote:
> Well, 2001 has truly been an unusual year for many
> of us -- some things good and some not so good.
> Whatever your own situation, I just wanted to say to
> you that I hope that you do have a very Merry
> Christmas, and hopefully, a wonderful and happy
> 2002.
>
> We plan to continue our HNG Alumni luncheons in the
> Spring and Fall of 2002, but just do not have any
> definite plans as to how we will be able to
> communicate and mail to you as we have in the past.
> The situation at Enron has affected our organization
> also.
>
> Will look forward to seeing you in the Spring.
>
> Leon Ullrich
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com


Jay, do we have copy's of all the executed documents... and if so, where are you going to put them.
Also, did we change the counterparty names in the system and put in offsetting transactions with SOCAL etc.... and new positions with PG&E.  These need to go into the system. MAKE SURE YOU CHECK THIS.

BT


[I'll see you at approx. 1  p.m. today right?]

Re the below, contact the credit group to see if they can speedily resolve
the credit issues so as to bring the EEI to bear on the transansaction,
clearly the best result.  Credit will also indicate whether the size of the
trade is such that they want to insist the trade is done under a completed
EEI Master, rather than being documented the 'old way' and then brought under
the EEI Master upon its completion.  If the trade will be completed under the
Tariff, you'll want to look at the Tariff to see what underlying terms you're
dealing with (e.g., 1 year limit on term of trade completed under the Tariff,
availability of LDs for a trade involving LD energy, etc.)

If not already known to you, Genia or Elizabeth may have input on where
things stood in Janice's negotiations with CP&L.

	Carol St Clair
	05/22/2001 12:13 PM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Carolina Power & Light

David:
CP&L has marked up a confirm that we sent to them for a deal that was done
5/8/2001 to make it subject to their 5/18/98 Tariff agreement.  We are in the
process of negotiating an EEI Master with them but have some outstanding
credit issues.  How should I respond to their mark-up?  This was one of
Janice's files.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:06:07 GMT
Content-type: text/x-oasis-csv
Connection: close

REQUEST_STATUS=200
ERROR_MESSAGE=
TIME_STAMP=20010420160607PD
VERSION=1.4
TEMPLATE=transstatus
OUTPUT_FORMAT=DATA
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_CODE=SPP
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_DUNS=959415852
RETURN_TZ=PD
DATA_ROWS=1
COLUMN_HEADERS=CONTINUATION_FLAG,ASSIGNMENT_REF,SELLER_CODE,SELLER_DUNS,CUSTOM
ER_CODE,CUSTOMER_DUNS,AFFILIATE_FLAG,PATH_NAME,POINT_OF_RECEIPT,POINT_OF_DELIV
ERY,SOURCE,SINK,CAPACITY_REQUESTED,CAPACITY_GRANTED,SERVICE_INCREMENT,TS_CLASS
,TS_TYPE,TS_PERIOD,TS_WINDOW,TS_SUBCLASS,NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY,OTHER_CURTA
ILMENT_PRIORITY,START_TIME,STOP_TIME,CEILING_PRICE,OFFER_PRICE,BID_PRICE,PRICE
_UNITS,PRECONFIRMED,ANC_SVC_LINK,ANC_SVC_REQ,POSTING_REF,SALE_REF,REQUEST_REF,
DEAL_REF,IMPACTED,COMPETING_REQUEST_FLAG,REQ
UEST_TYPE,RELATED_REF,NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG,STATUS,STATUS_NOTIFICATION,STATUS_
COMMENTS,TIME_QUEUED,RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT,TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE,PRIMARY_PROVIDER_
COMMENTS,SELLER_REF,SELLER_COMMENTS,CUSTOMER_COMMENTS,SELLER_NAME,SELLER_PHONE
,SELLER_FAX,SELLER_EMAIL,CUSTOMER_NAME,CUSTOMER_PHONE,CUSTOMER_FAX,CUSTOMER_EM
AIL,REASSIGNED_REF,REASSIGNED_CAPACITY,REASSIGNED_START_TIME,REASSIGNED_STOP_T
IME
N,SPP
01007475,SPP,959415852,EPMI,848921276,N,CONTROL/HILLTOP,SVR55,HIL345,"CISO","P
AC",12,12,HOURLY,NON-FIRM,POINT_TO_POINT,PEAK,FIXED,W/O ANCILLARY
SRVCS,1,,20010420150000PD,20010420220000PD,6.9000,6.9000,6.9000,MW-HR,Y,SC:(SP
P:AR:SPP
01003082);,SC:M;,,,,,0,N,ORIGINAL,,,CONFIRMED,MAILTO:mark.guzman@enron.com;,,2
0010420115611PD,20010420122600PD,20010420140457PD,,,,,Carolyn
Bonari,(775)834-4180,(775)834-4296,sppc.oasis@sppc.com,Don
Norman,,(503)464-3740,lester.rawson@enron.com,,,,


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 04:09 PM -----

	Bob Bowen
	11/03/2000 04:35 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: See Spot

Attached is GTC Spot confirm form  and Spot GTC


MARK EDWARD:

As a fellow Texas legal professional, I would like to apprise you of the
following CLEonline.com seminars taking place in the month of March,
in which you or some of your colleagues or associates may be interested.
All of these seminars are fully accredited for Participatory CLE credits
(not self-study) by the State Bar of Texas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

                  MARCH SEMINARS ON CLEONLINE.COM

1. Anticipating Will Contests and How to Avoid Them [3.0]
2. Avoiding Malpractice Claims: Things to Do (and NOT Do) on the First Day You
  Represent a Client [1.0 ETHICS]
3. Confidentiality and Privileges in Electronic Communications [3.0 ETHICS]
4. Damages in Insurance Litigation [2.0]
5. Deposition Issues and Strategies: Today and Into the 21st Century [3.0]
6. Dissecting Web/E-Commerce Environment and Analyzing the Legal Issues [1.0]
7. Effective Negotiation and Mediation Advocacy [3.0]
8. Ethical Considerations for Multi-Party and Complex Litigation [3.0 ETHICS]
9. Ethical Considerations in Estate Planning for Spouses [1.0 ETHICS]
10. Ethical Issues Arising From Using Experts in Litigation [1.0 ETHICS]
11. How to Collect Child Support in Texas [3.0]
12. IP Litigation Issues: Trade Secrets, Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks
[3.0]
13. Legal Ethics for Corporate and In-house Counsel [3.0 ETHICS]
14. More Selected Ethical Issues Facing Texas Litigators [1.0 ETHICS]
15. New Texas Legislation '99: Real Estate, Lending, and Other Commercial
Matters
  [3.0]
16. Offshore Trusts: Uses for Asset Protection Purposes [3.0]
17. Punitive Damages: Preparing Plaintiff's and Defendant's Case for the
Punitive
  Damage Phase [3.0]
18. School Personnel Law in Texas [3.0]
19. Selected Ethical Issues in Intellectual Property Licensing [1.0 ETHICS]
20. Telecommuting for Lawyers: Tips, Hints and Avoiding Pitfalls [Together
with
  ABA Law Practice Management Section] [2.0]
21. Texas Law of Eminent Domain [3.0]
22. Texas Real Estate Law - Recent Case Update [3.0]
23. Texas Trust Law Update d 1999 Legislative Changes [1.0]
25. The ABC's of Appellate Practice for California Litigators [1.0]
26. The Organizational Client: Attorney-Client Privilege and the No-Contact
Rule
  [3.0 ETHICS]
27. Weblaw: Legal Issues Involved with the Design and Hosting of Websites on
the
  Internet [3.0]
28. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Current Case Law Developments in Texas [3.0]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

For more details on any of these CLEonline.com seminars, please visit:

                      http://www.cleonline.com

    There is NO LIMIT on the number of CLE credits you can earn
    through CLEonline.com seminars under the Texas MCLE rules.
    So you can now satisfy ALL of your annual MCLE requirements
    through our convenient online CLE seminars, without
    sacrificing valuable time away from your practice.

Thanks for your time and consideration.  We would greatly appreciate it
if you could pass this information along to any of your colleagues and
associates who may also be interested in these CLEonline.com seminars. If
you need further information, please reply back or give us a call, and we
will be happy to provide such information to you.

[Please Note:  If you are not interested in receiving CLEonline.com
seminar announcements, we apologize for the interruption, and we will
gladly remove your name from future mailings if you would simply
reply back to this message and ask that you not receive future
announcements.]

Regards,

Michael De La Rosa, Esq.
CLEonline.com
(512) 310-9618
info@cleonline.com
http://www.cleonline.com


Tracy,
A portion of the $200k cost is for an EWS team which does Mergers, Aquisitions, and Divestitures(MAD) work.  ETS' allocated cost is approximately $50K for the MAD team but we will only pay for actual charges in 2002 if we use the team.
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Gary
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:57 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Leschber, Edie
Subject:	RE: ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002

Tracy,
There is a team in Enron Wholesale Services Human Resources which is dedicated to PEP/PRC design and administration.  The Human Resources charge of $200K to ETS is an allocation of the PEP/PRC team's cost.
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:32 PM
To:	Leschber, Edie; Smith, Gary
Cc:	Botello, Mary
Subject:	RE: ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002

I need to understand what services you are providing and to what group within ETS.

Thanks

Tracy Geaccone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leschber, Edie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Smith, Gary
Subject:	ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002

Attached please find a schedule of planned allocations from ENA to other Business units.  Please review those allocations to your business unit (ETS) and provide positive confirmation of your agreement.

Thank you,
Edie Leschber
ENA Financial Operations
X30669

 << File: EA Allocations to Other BUs-9.19.01.xls >>


Attached are revised Phone & Room Numbers and Gas Logistics Directory By Teams.
Let me know if you find any mistakes and forward to anyone that I missed.
	Tnx, Alma G.


(See attached file: HPLN0405.xls)

 - HPLN0405.xls